You will be in small groups to explore in practices. We will be six or seven groups and In those small groups, obviously you will first start by introducing yourselves to your to the other group members And then you will be given some links To go and explore some practices links to examples of public engagement and you will explore those links They are you will be given several links for each group. For example, one group will explore Games in public engagement and you will have links towards several games And sometimes the link will be a link to an article and the article will have links inside to other examples of games So you are free to explore as much as you want That's for as far as you want You can even Google some things if you'd like to find more examples or have some doubts or whatever or if you want to explore further so Starting with the links. I'm going to give to you. You are going to explore all those All this practice and you will be given a fairly large amount of time You will have 25 minutes, which is rather long But please don't be fooled by this long to apparently long time Because during this time you will have to explore you will have a lot of matter for example in some in many of the links You will see simply a website presenting an activity happening But sometimes you will see an academic article Detailing or evaluating an article a practice and that is much longer So don't think you have to read everything in detail. You may also just browse quickly Have a look have a glance here and there the the important You can also organize your group as you wish you can either all see together the same link and discuss about it Or everyone can go into a different link and then you come back And discuss them together for this you are free to organize yourself as you wish But basically you are a small working group devoted to one practice Having some links and resources to explore them and what you have to do is first of all discuss to understand what is this practice What does it cover? What different variety of things does it cover? What do you think is the value to the public for this? What are the assets of this practice? Why does it work? Well, what are the is the value to the researcher? Why should a researcher do this? What does may it bring to the researcher? But also what are the main constraints the issues the challenges the difficulties of this practice and last of course Are there some types of research what which are suitable or unsuitable for this practice? Maybe it's a practice that's great for social chances. So that's great for Controversial issues, but that's not great to talk about something that is maybe particle physics. So you'll have to To discuss that among you. What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses of this practice? What are the best context for this practice and what are the challenges? So very shortly, I'll ask each group one after the other to take Three minutes to present The practice that we have explored. What is it? What seems interesting about it or what is striking about it? What is the value of it to the participants to the public to the researchers? What are the constraints that rollbacks and what is a favorable context of favorable research to apply it? And what is seems less favorable then after this few minutes of presentation of the we if there are some questions from the rest Of us we can have a very quick one or two minutes of discussion and then we'll move to the next group group one You had to explore the topic of showing your research in various ways by telling by dancing by drawing So can you tell us quickly what you found and how you analyzed it? Okay, we research those examples Which are really interesting examples of ways of presenting the research And as for the first question, what it is we we were discussing that it's a it's a matter of transposition of research into different types of medians For different types of audiences that can relate with with certain topics The value to the public We find value for the to the public in terms of supporting the public to be better educated Um to get to know the the research team It also came up the the answer of entertainment factor So this this performative but also really artistic element was was something that was really interesting within those examples that were presented and in terms of widening the the target group that the research is not just reserved for the academics but also for for a wider audience So they can relate with the research The value to the researcher Is was to build the bridge between academics and wider public In terms of exploring also new topics And developing new methods of translation of the research for the target audience Um The okay the main constraints issues or challenges. We actually didn't find any Any particular uh constraints With regards to those three examples We thought also about other ways of presenting for example, because all all of them are very very performative. So we can also think about Um lecture performance, which is also a kind of merging of The theory and practice this performativity part. Maybe also audio books But again, it depends of how to uh, what kind of audience you have. So if you have, for example people who have, I don't know blindness then What kind of what kind of uh medium would be appropriate to present the research Team to them. Just first of all, thank you very much for that for for this very relevant Look on this practice And indeed you had as you can see already by telling your phd in three minutes by dancing your phd drawing your phd it's a matter of translation with very strong constraints such as You have only three minutes to explain your whole topic and why it's important to you and to the world or Make it a dance even if you don't know how to dance or make it a comic book And uh, this is the the nice I I agree with you that for I think any research topic can fit into this category The nice thing is that it's very open to anyone Because any research topic can be transformed into it can be told by a media And for researchers is a quite it's a quite comfortable way to do public engagement because you are telling about your research And you're knowledgeable with the research so you are Transforming your research into something else, but we're still speaking about Mainly your research and your research only and its value So it's less let's say maybe destabilizing than other practices. We're going to see later The difficulty is of course, you need some either Oral skill being able to speak in front of an audience in three minutes being catchy and and energetic or to Be able to even if you're not a dancer to show your body If you are not a drawer to find a drawer and work with a drawer who can make a comic book Or draw them yourself. So there are some specific skills you'd have to either work on or Accept to practice at amateur level With the with the audience Obviously, there is also the question of the channel. How will you how will you send these drawings dances speeches? And obviously if you do very often, for example, a three-minute thesis is often done in universities So the the audience that would move and go and sit in a university is not the same one As it is quite specific on the ends, which is Very good and acceptable, but you have to be aware that here you are Target the audience who will come is the one that Is aware of university events and who is ready to come and sit in a university Thank you very much. We move to group two who focused on games Shall I tell something about the game? Yes, please What what were these games and what do you find as value and as constraints? There was a game eye-wire And it is a game Where the citizens can make a 3d puzzle of the neurons in the brain And can help Biology and medical researchers by their research project to find more neurons in the brain And a 3d pistol works from artificial intelligence That was the game I could understand on the website Okay, no way Because you had to sign in so Okay, it was the information I could find that's fine. It was just one example of game, but but yes, did you see other games? um What did you read about other games? You are anyone else from the group too so now we split the task and I had a website in which You could download or create and download a card game And the point was really to have a group discussion and the challenge of the game was to find a richer consensus and The interest for the public is simply to discuss and learn to explore new topics And for scientists to actively involve the public in a certain topic The constraints I found was the time as it takes 90 minutes and well find the right audience and also Well, the challenge of the game that is interesting is to reach a consensus Then Well interest, I think it's really interesting for all type of science as it was really reaching it was really covering many subjects so I didn't find A use for a specific one, but it can be really used by any researcher or else Thank you very much anything else any other games or other considerations related to games from the group too Yeah, I think it was like it's Like they wanted to tell us how games or like virtual reality can be used to Exchange ideas or like to have a plan. I like this idea that you for example want to Have a new neighborhood and then you can like in virtual reality You can go around and see if you like it and then you participate like what you want to change Um, and I think this is good that you can participate But I also think it's bad because there is no Reality feedback. So I would say I wanted this and that And also I think it's very difficult to reach the final Like conclusion to the site like we want to do it like this Um Then I think it's good to use it as a citizen science Especially for kids like they can in virtual reality you can really like then see how things are going on and also for um Yeah public understanding and citizen science What as I wanted to say something more But I forgot Now I think it's interesting for researchers. Uh, but then you are also very much tied to another like Person who knows how to do games. So It's difficult to do it for researcher itself Or herself or himself Thank you very much Yes, there was also nice example of how six phd students show their phd project through video games And in order to that they were also helped by video gamers developers So I think it was also nice, you know example of how you know Video game developers the it people with the researchers that were also working together in these kind of things But as Simona said it was I think it was a really nice example But at the end the public the target public is quite a limit because you cannot With video games you cannot go to all the public just more for teenagers young people or people who really know about technology Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Anything else you'd like to add from the group too No, okay, great. Thank you. I think you you've said most things I would like just to outline first of all You've said the need of a partnership for these types of active interactions Not only for hosting but really just for development of the activity Unless you have some game development skills yourself You will need some support either encoding or even just for a board game in how to develop a board game How a board game work? It's it's it's a specific skill and a specific job So you'll have to work with partners who have this know-how and are happy to collaborate with you That's what one of the From I have been involved in similar projects before and one of the things that researchers loved Was actually working with the game developers and seeing how their research could be translated into the game And it could gamify in a way This is something that the that was has been highly highly enjoyed So this is would be very important You have various types of games some are more entertaining and like can be quick based or can be exploratory and But some can be more deliberative like lady side the one. I think uh, simona you've explored But was no it was not simona. It was isabella, right? I think isabella explore this one lady side, which is a board game with cards, which is not really fun I mean, there is no fun Mechanism it's more a game with the cards You will read some elements of knowledge and you will debate So it's uh, the game is here to frame a debate So as you've said, it needs a lot of you need a lot of time and organization for this So usually for example, the ladies have is often played with schools because the children are captive And they have to stay for half an hour for one hour and a half But you can also play These types of games in other places. For example, there are some shorter discussion games shorter than lady side More easy to start into and that can be done in 30 minutes And those are often done in pubs and in bars And in cafes so you can even print the game materials On the beer coaster or on or on the papers you put on the table usually to keep it clean Uh, so that the material of the bar That you have to drink is already printed for the game And and then engage the people in the in the bar to to the ones who want of course You need to to to do the game But for this once again, you will need not only someone to design the game But in that case also a facilitator because this game is a debate game is highly facilitated And you need someone who has the some facilitating experience Um, all right. Thank you very much for this and we'll move to the next group three Which is focusing on hackathons Nice Malin you want to introduce and Yeah, we could interact. No, go ahead. Go ahead Okay, so no just a few words if you want i'm introducing in the issue wanted to To add did something So to the best of our knowledge hackathon is an activity that we could develop In terms of a researcher i'm supposing To interact directly with the people's clustered in small groups Starting from broader challenges or specific issues to discuss in order to acquire Values from the public in Collecting ideas suggestions that are more practical Supporting decision-making in policymaking or managerial Environment So this is to the best of our knowledge what we learned in our brainstorming minutes ago so from the point of view of we what is the value to the public is Just like to interact with them and Co-creating something that could be also useful to improve their lifestyles and in general giving suggestions to the Public institutions or private companies in order to support the development In the eco society environment. This is what what i'm thinking about And summarizing our brainstorming that we did What is the value to the researcher? Developing an hackathon's activity. The value is to collect some ideas information data in order to improve and remodeling our for example research questions and uh remodulating also the research activities in finding in terms of theoretical and practical points Something that is concretely a social value at the end because it's completely linked to the to the real Economy or real society troubles That the public engaged in the hackathons gave us You have one last minute One last minute challenges the targeting of the people that we have The budget that we have to allocate the resources to develop this activity And also targeting issues objectives to give the small groups activities in In engaging and use of all open on Multiple choices open question on multiple choices issues. So maybe this is my point of thank you Thank you very much. Is there a quick addition from anyone else from this group? A quick one No, I think we just uh, we we um had a bit of a hard time wrapping our heads around what does the concept actually entail practically And is it useful when within social science for instance, if you don't have skills for coding And using it based solutions. So actually we discussed the challenges the most Um, so yes, uh, thank you very much for this Indeed hackathons are things that are quite heavy to organize and to build Because do you need a venue you need a very strong organization unit facilitation as well and a very Structured day with activities. You need to recruit people from with various skills The interest of hackathon is having participants having a wide variety of skills Whether it is coding whether it is just knowledge of the city if you're designing something about the city So it's quite a heavy work And it's usually not a huge number of participants that you will involve It's you will not have thousands of people in the hackathon. So It's intensive for a small number of people However, it's very qualitative meaning that these these few people will spend a lot of time together Create their own ideas build on your research. So you may have some great insight and ideas It's a very qualitative Type of methodology. Thank you very much. We'll move to the next group with group four Which has focused I think initially on art and science collaborations Okay, yeah, thank you the question is What happens when you put an artist and a scientist in a room together? And the answer is that The result will be an installation Or an artwork that probably will be very interesting in order to Transmit something about communicate something about science and and research and This public this is a in our opinion. This is a good public engagement sample that tries to build that tries to build a relationship between scientists and an artist And and try us and tries to discuss their findings with the public in an easy and Understandable way. We have seen a lot of examples in our links about About neuroscience, physiology, immunology, genetics and even about health and health curation and pain and in in all these cases, there was a The the the idea the idea basically was to transmit that science Can be Very easy easy in this can be the we can disseminate science in a very easy way What what is the value for the public? Basically is that they get awareness about some very important questions And about how art can contribute to the in in some cases even to heal people With dancing drawing and painting activities While for the researcher they can transmit Simplified scientific concepts and and it also became more now In our opinion, what are the main constraints or challenges? we We saw that it is not direct interaction Of the public in most of the cases but because we we saw a lot of films and examples of portraits And in we think that there is the risk that there is no interaction on in some cases. There is not There is no participation of the of the public about the question of If there are particular types of research suitable or unsuitable The conclusion that we arrived is that Any kind of scientific fields can be disseminated with with art With art with artworks or other kind of installations Thank you very much. Anything else you'd like to add about group four? from group four I also wanted just to say that He explained everything quite Good, so I do not have anything to add Thank you and I fully agree with both of you. Thanks Xavier for the but it's very clear presentation. So to Indeed as you said just coming back to one element, which is with which kind of field of research field. Is it More interesting and for example, we saw that in games you can almost make games from any topic However, if you want to make a discussion game or a debate game Then probably it's more interesting and it it will be much more easy and efficient If your research topic is a controversial one or is linked to science and society questions and to people's lives Because there there is something to debate about and then people will have their own Expertise of their life or their own values to put on in the to put in the debate whereas if you're studying astrophysics You can find some debate questions, but it would be less easy than if you're speaking about genetic disease for example or about smoking in the city or transport in the city Now Coming coming back to art and science I would say once again everything is is possible. It's very open But there are some topics where it's more easy and once again if it has a link with People's lives either because it's in the organization like the city But also in terms of body one of example that you had was a festival which tackled a lot about things about breathlessness And about pain. So obviously if you're tackling the topic like pain for an artist It's a wonderful topic to explore in various ways And for the audience that is something where they can identify or understand Look at their own life in new ways. So it's once again here A wonderful wonderful topic to to work on Art and science collaborations are also great for topics where they are ethical issues Where they are possible controversy political issues at stake because art is quite great to strike people and and force them to face Uncomfortable questions or have these uncomfortable question rise And we will go immediately to the next group, which is a group focusing on something quite specific Which have been trending a lot in the very recent years in in the science Communication community which are escape rooms. So group five your turn Yes, maybe it's up to me to present our our work As maybe most of you know an escape room is a game in which a team So a group of people is locked in a room and this group must Try a way to escape from this room by figuring out puzzles So due to the characteristics of this of this practice The value for the public could be the fact that they can engage and having fun Without necessarily having the tool to have a wider motivation behind that So behind the fact that they will have fun While from the point of view of the researcher Maybe it could be an opportunity to have a wider audience as they this audience will have fun by participating in this kind of research As for the The research fields that we think Would be more suitable for this kind of practice Without that maybe Research fields like technology archaeology or in general The natural sciences so biology or geology could be suitable for this kind of research While it could it could be much more harder for blue sky research. So more theoretical Fields such as theoretical mathematics Or also maybe the social the social sciences research fields and the challenges that a researcher could Could find could be the fact that it could be potentially costly especially if The escape room is organized in a physical space Even if as we we saw we can have also a digital escape room So we have also a very nice example online Or also another problem could be the fact that All the the game should be based on Understandable problems for common citizens. So it could it should be Studied very well before its implementation And that's all Thank you very much anything to add from group file Maybe I lost all my group mates All right, you were extremely clear so Thank you very much for this And we'll move immediately to the last I don't know and that was the last group. I actually wonderful So we are right on time wonderful So thank you very much for these escape rooms have been trending a lot They are great because first of all because as with any game or any new activity that is trending Science communication immediately thinks oh teenagers are all and the students are all doing escape rooms Maybe we can do one about science and especially our escape rooms are about Investigating solving puzzles for engagement in science and research. It's great. So you even had an example related to law research Where even if you don't have the puzzle related to the research the whole universe and the finding of the stories behind the Escape room can be linked to your research, but I agree with you in terms of topics your analysis I think is very relevant If you have some time now I in the following weeks I invite all of you first of all to come back to the This mural but also to the google link. I did write it in In on the mural in us in a yellow post it's close to my big orange post it The link to the google doc where you have all the links So you can explore the other kinds of practices and have a look at the variety of them There are two groups that we haven't used one is actually close to art and science It's a part of let's say art and science collaboration, which is immersive theater And one very good example for example is this invincible play Which was a a theater play where you were inside the situation with a family arguing about something that is related to Enhancing your brain changing your DNA to to enhance your body or your brain and who you are It was done by the University of Bristol And you even had some moments where the audience could vote or give their views on this with smileys To see if they would agree. They were happy about this this outcome or this decision or unhappy about it Or with dead in berg for example, which was done in scotland in edinburgh And that dead in bra was Was a zombie night In edinburgh let you discover this with a very specific humor But it was a very very interesting one. They won the play it was I think Seven years ago or something like this and they won the award from the nccp for this action And the last thing is the seventh group is about meeting researchers. So it's just Actions that are less focused on your research But it could be on the researcher and meeting who is the researcher What is the life of the researcher and in that we have science cafes where you can meet a researcher You will speak about the research, of course But you are here to meet and chat with a researcher in an informal way You have the action meet the researcher online From the imperial college the speed dating event. I did put you one here But for the european researchers night, we have we use this a lot in all countries in europe speed datings where People were coming and have Used to have only a few minutes like four or seven minutes with a researcher Ask all the questions they want chat as much as they want about whatever they want But four minutes and then change tables and they discover another researcher. So in one hour in half an hour They will meet a lot of researchers And human library I mentioned already so it's something a bit different But that can be a great inspiration And I am a scientist as well, which is led led by a person but by more by boards and information But still the same idea behind So I will invite you to have a glance explore these practices See which one strike you if you are a researcher, which one could apply to your research If you are a supporter of research, which ones do you think has the most value to the public's? And to the researchers, which one would you like to Foster to encourage researchers doing if you were launching a call for tender Would you launch a call and try to ask for games? Would you launch a call and try to ask for debate oriented activities? Whether they are games or others or as the artistic collaborations What do you think has the most value for your researchers or from? Or for for the for the public so that you just instead of just doing public engagement at large You can focus a little bit more and and push one type of impact I'll leave you for the week with these questions.  Which one would like to try yourself and are there opportunities for specific practices in your research topic? Thank you very much. I Wish you an excellent day, and I will see you Next week for the next session which where we tackle impact and evaluation Thanks, and have a great day Thank you. Thank you. Thank you


سورة الممتحينة سورة number 60 of the Qur'an الله سبحانه وتعالى says to Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم and the lesson is for every one of us he says there is a chance that Allah can create love between you and your enemy سبحان الله did you hear that منهما وده والله قادير والله غفور ورحيم verse number 7 of surah number 60 الله says indeed Allah is all able and Allah can and Allah may create love between you and those whom there is an enmity against for indeed Allah is able and Allah is most forgiving most merciful take a look at the time of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم that happened with خالد ابن الوليد رضي الله عنه he was an enemy of Islam he killed so many of the Muslims a day came when he became known as رضي الله عنه we have to actually teach ourselves what it was all about a time in the battle of Uhud when he was leading the kuffar one of the groups of the kuffar who came from the other side of the mount and that was a change in the course of that particular war of Uhud we know that was خالد ابن الوليد خطاب رضي الله عنه what happened to him enemy of Islam look at ابو سفيان رضي الله عنه what happened to him he was an enemy of Islam they all changed how the will of Allah Allah can create and this is why in a narration the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم speaks about loving people and hating people when you love someone love them in moderation perhaps one day they may not be so close to you again if you were if you were intimately close to them that they knew your ins and outs they can hold you ransom سبحان الله because they know too many details about you you were too close that's the problem you will pay a price for being so close to someone that you actually lowered your guard and at the same time you pay a price for hating someone so much that you are embarrassed to make amends with them one day أحبب حبيبك هونما أساء أن يكون بغيضك يومما أبغيض بغيضك هونما أساء أن يكون حبيبك يومما when you love you love in moderation perhaps that person may be your enemy one day so be careful think about it and when you hate you hate in moderation perhaps that person may be your beloved one day سبحان الله may Allah grant us a deep understanding take a look at this verse doesn't it show you the power of Allah doesn't it show you that Allah owns the hearts and these hearts turn by Allah سبحانه وتعالى will so that is why we say اللهم يا مقلب القلوب ثبت قلوبنا على دينك oh Allah who strengthens the hearts who is in control of the heart strengthen my heart upon the Deen not away from it I mean so my brothers and sisters these are some of the beautiful verses of the Quran and this is how we will be able to save ourselves from problems difficulties like I said when you get too close to someone that you start telling them all your secrets one day you may pay a heavy price for that may Allah grant us all wisdom in our relationships and when you dislike someone be careful you don't have to hurt them in a way that you will regret one day when you want to make amends may Allah سبحانه وتعالى make us again from among those who are wise


Hello and welcome to another AFC VTV preview show. I'm joined by matchday commentator Chris Temple and we'll be going back over a busy few days in the Cherries camp. Here's what's coming up. We'll be looking back at that valiant 3-1 defeat at Manchester City. And finally we'll be looking ahead to tomorrow's game against Huddlesfield here at Vitality Stadium. But first, let's go back to Saturday and that 3-1 defeat at the Etihad Stadium. Here are the short highlights. Bernadinho captaining Manchester City today at that ball down the left-hand side and Sarnay snuck in again here. Begavits comes out, good goalkeeping, Bernardo Silva out to the city ahead and the Cherries hold up, only 15 minutes I'm afraid. A straight ball over the left-hand side, Begavits initially did well. He was helpless though when Bernardo Silva smashed it back towards goal. It's Manchester City 1 for the first. Well, you needed a bit of luck there with the bounce when it come off the cupid McNivison to stop the first one. But as he's carried it, he's just carried it into his feet and he's smashed it home when Arnav Silva. Get over to the right-hand side. Francis swings one in with his left foot. Callan Wilson with the hang-up! And Callan Wilson finds the equaliser for the Cherries! Just as they did against Arsenal last weekend, they pull back one of the big guns on the stroke of half-time. Callan Wilson's seventh Premier League goal of the season and the Yeti had his stunned into silence, one-one! Well, it was a great build-up. Series of passes across the penalty area, then back again. I think it was Fran, I was left foot that curled it in and just missed everybody out, except Callan, who got a full head on it. I think the keeper got a touch but there was too much power in the header. It's the second half and he's sterling again. He's got support from Danilo on the outside. Danilo's no shot, beaten by Begavits! He sets a new Premier League record, an element of fortune, but the Cherries once more fall to the skill of sterling, 2-1 City. Well, we had a good counter to the previous one and that one did move around a bit, took a couple of ricochets before stealing. He seems to like playing against us so much. Played down the left-hand side, nice link-up, Sane drives it across and it is 3-1 and that probably is the game over. And it's Ilkai Gundawan who scores Manchester City's third there as the Cherries fell to clear the corner convincingly and the Etihad rises as City head for the eighth home win of the season out of eight. Well, we've tried the best we can to stem the tide, but City just kept coming and coming and coming and we've got to 80 minutes. We've been in the game at 2-1 for most of the game but 3-1 will be a tall order now to get back in 10 minutes. Well, there we go, a goal from Callum Wilson, wasn't enough on the day for the Cherries. Extended highlights are available for free on AFCB TV. Chris, it was a tough game as expected, but 3-1 is nothing to be ashamed of, is it? It's not. You know, you look at, again, some big decisions that could have gone against Bournemouth, could have gone with Bournemouth, I should say, which could have changed the game, but ultimately it was a bit like the United and Arsenal games in that there were excellent parts of the performance. You know, the game was alive till what was it, the 79th minute when City scored their third. Yes, Bournemouth, you know, they didn't actually have many shots, but they had some good moments, certainly gave City one or two things to think about and deserve their equaliser on the stroke of half-time, for sure, and exactly the same way it panned out against Arsenal, of course, when they went behind, pegged them back literally on half-time. You were hoping they would come out in the second half and start with a bit between the teeth, and they did actually. They came out and had a, you know, Joshua King floating one over the bat that Charlie Daniels couldn't quite get on the end of early in the half, but of course then City, you know, wasn't very happy. He was hopping around, by the way, in the technical area in the early stage of that second half, but then City just got their got their foothold back in the game. The quality they had, Leroy Sarnay was, you know, played out of his skin. He was absolutely fantastic. Simon Farage, I'm really sorry for him. He did so much running up and down, you know, trying to keep trying to keep track of him. Charlie's went with three at the back, which, you know, was Eddie's way of trying to contain them. It worked to a certain extent. I think they'll be pretty happy with how the game plan was sort of panned out because, as me had a couple of saves to make, City had a lot of the ball, as we said they would do. But ultimately, yeah, again, it was relatively small margins. There was more between the sides than there was in the Man United and Arsenal games, but then City are top of the league and have been flying their eight out of eight at home. So all of those things were to be expected, but all in all, I think if they were going to lose the game, they certainly came out with a lot of credit. And that was the, we bumped into some fans on the M6 on the way home at service stations and that was the general feeling was, you know, pride and credit in defeat really. And one positive is another goal for Callum Wilson as well. Yeah, good to see him back scoring. Had a couple of games with that, a goal, of course, but had a great header, by the way, as well, a really, you know, nice little dinking from Frano and Callum Wilson had to generate a lot of the power himself on that header. So to be able to do so, it was a really good header. There were lots of defenders around as well. So, yeah, great for him scoring different types of goals as well. Good for him to be, you know, still catching the eye after his England exploits. I just saw him this morning, actually, and asked him if he'd ever been to Kosovo, who England, of course, he got in their group and he hasn't. So, he might be hoping to be in that squad by the time that comes around in a year's time. But, yeah, all in all, good to have Callum back on the goal trail. Joshua King, you know, caused them one or two problems again. David Brooks, of course, was left out, which is an interesting selection choice with what's coming up this week. But, yeah, all in all, you know, good for Callum certainly to be back on the goal trail. And, you know, he's right up there in the table of goal scorers at the moment. And, of course, he could have had another one. I think Joshua King put a lovely ball into the box for him and he couldn't quite connect with it, could he? Yeah, that's the thing. He had a couple of half chances where actually, if you were being ruthless, you would say someone in the form he's been in, in an England shirt, you know, an England international, probably should be taking one of those. There was a particularly good one close in at the near post where he just miss-kicked it and he got in front of his defender. So, yeah, you're right to say that I think he could have had at least one more. He probably, you know, he probably would be thinking he could have had a hat-trick if one of those chances had come off cleanly. But he got one. I think he probably was kicking himself that he didn't have more. And it's worth mentioning Tyrone Minx as well. He put in an excellent format, didn't he? Yeah, absolutely. Myself and Willow both agree. We thought he was the best Bournemouth player, to be honest with you. And for a guy who's not been, not even in the team, but it hasn't been in the 18 for a lot of the games in recent weeks as well. Having come back sort of playing under 21s here and there to get some minutes. But he stepped in really well on the left of the back three. I think it's a position that suits him pretty well. He's got his height, obviously. He's very quick. He dealt with the threat that was coming at him. He couldn't be blamed if it was a big game to come into it. He was caught a bit short of sharpness. But to his credit, he was absolutely ready to go. Big call by Eddie to throw him in. You know, from the cold, really. But he fitted the way that Bournemouth wanted to play system-wise with the personnel they had available. So the question is now, he tends to play in a back three. That opens up that third sort of central defensive position for him. Will he dislodge Steve Cook or Nathan Ake in a four as a centre half? I'm not sure he will at the moment. So for tomorrow night, he'll be interested to see how Eddie goes if he, you know, Huddersfield do play a three at the back. So if Eddie opted to go three at the back, then you can see Tyrone staying in. It would be a bit harsh for me if he wasn't in the team tomorrow night. But I think whichever shape Eddie goes with will define whether Tyrone's in the team or not. And of course, we did have that change of formation. How did you feel it went on the weekend? I mean, it looked all right. Yeah, it looked okay. I mean, there was a lot of work. Charlie Daniels and Simon Francis on the on the outer edges of that sort of midfield four, if you like, or I reluctant to call them wing backs because they were doing more back than wing. Let's put it that way. But they had they had it all on with with Sarnay and with Stirling. Fundamentally, the formation, yeah, you can say it worked out okay, but they lost the game. There was a lot of space. Gundewa had a great game in midfield. Bernardo Silva for them was finding a lot of space. And again, we talk about people coming in and having to sort of get up to speed. Andrew Sermon's hardly hardly featured much recently and he all of a sudden found himself starting because Dan Gosling, as we thought he might do, didn't make it. So yeah, Lewis Cook and Sermon had a tough day in central midfield for sure. Jefferson's back tomorrow night, of course. It seems unlikely that Dan Gosling will be fit. So one of Lewis Cook or Sermon will have another chance. And it seems this season against the big teams we saw against Arsenal, now Manchester City, the gap isn't quite as big as it has been previous years, has it? That was the closest Bournemouth have come to city, definitely. I think, you know, that we talked about the previous results up there that have been a couple of horror shows, a 5-1 and a couple of four-nils. This was the closest. But again, like last season, City actually scored their third goal in exactly the same minute, 79 as they did last season when so the game was alive for a long time. But yeah, I think in the past it has been a bit of a possibly slightly damaged limitation if you like and, you know, trying to come away without getting an absolute walloping, whereas this time it was, you know, they stretched them. And we've got to mention the Tyrone Ming's penalty shout, by the way, at 2-1. I have to say at the time, they were head-on to us basically, so they were facing us. So we didn't quite get as good a view of it as the TV cameras later show. So we didn't realise quite how good a penalty shout that was. But, I mean, that has to be a penalty. I feel like I'm getting referees at the minute. I've said this before, I wasn't very complimentary of Craig Paulson last week in the Arsenal and the referee, Stuart Atwell, could not have been in a better position. Anywhere else in the pitch, that's a free kick. I would love to speak to Stuart Atwell and say, you've seen it, tell us why you haven't given it. Two hands in the back, a clear push. Didn't realise it at the time, but absolutely that should be a penalty. And if it goes in, then it's a completely different game. 2-2 and everything can happen. 2-2 at that point, and you know, Terry's buoyed by that. City fans, as they saw when born with, you know, peaked them back to 1-1, City fans were, it's almost like they were offended by Ireland, the City went off the boil for a few minutes. So if Bournemouth get back to 2-2 at that stage, yeah, things could be massively different, a bit like David Brooks' goal here against Arsenal, if that's allowed, it could be a different game. So ifs and buts and maybes, but I think that was a, so in the last two games Bournemouth have had two big decisions that, you know, I would say potentially have cost them. Well, next up for the Cherries, it's tomorrow's game against Huddersfield here at Vitality Stadium. It was quite an afternoon last year, so let's take a look at the game. So the referee, Probert, has waved Haddish and I down the field of course, he can't come back on, he's had treatment, so there's only ten Huddersfield players on the field to defend this corner, which is going to be taken by Jordan Ive. And it comes, the heads go up, and it's Callum Wilson on target in the Premier League for the first time since January! The excitement about Callum Wilson's return, quite right. He's back on the score sheet and Bournemouth despite being second best in the first 26 minutes, leading against Huddersfield. Lots of runs made to confuse the lines, but they were completely bewildered! Wilson stolen, fired into the bottom right corner and the Cherries were in four minutes of search too clear. The Cherries sweeping forward here, Daniels down the left side of the penalty area, Callum Wilson deep into the box, running onto its sermon, tipped over the crossbar. Thirty seconds left, or Francis has gone into the challenge here. The Cherries captain has gone, sent off, two yellow cards. Referee has been alerted by the fourth official there, because it was at Referee Proba and initially said, played on, purely to be careful, artists pinched it back! Well, what an afternoon that was, a hat trick from Callum Wilson on the day. Chris, they can take plenty of confidence from that one, can't they? Yeah, it did well because I think ultimately it was a score line that flattered them on the day, because they had Simon Francis sent off relatively early on in the second half, or on the stroke of half time, played a lot of the game with ten men, but still came out four-nil winners. I think Huddersfield would say they were still adapting to the league at that point, and the Premier League was still a bit of a shock to them. But of course the reverse fixture later in the season, Bournemouth went to Huddersfield and got whacked.  So yeah, two polar opposite games last season. Huddersfield, you know, this season they've been a bit sticky to start with, they won a couple, then they obviously had a man sent off on Saturday and lost at home to Brighton, so sort of checked a bit of their momentum, but they had had a couple of wins. They've only won two games all season in all competition, so to sort of started to get up and running, and then to have a man sent off. I would say it was a bit of a harsh red card as well. It was a little bit high, but I know David Wagner, the manager, wasn't very happy about it. So for Steve Munier, who, which will rule him out tomorrow night, and he's a big physical presence, so they have got a similar player in Du Poitre who could come in, so from that point of view it might not have been convenient to them too much, but in terms of them, they're having the sort of sticky second season, if you like, finished exactly the same as Bournemouth in their first season, 16th in the table, albeit Bournemouth had eight more points, actually, interestingly, but yeah, just at the moment they're having to find some answers because people have found them out a little bit. Brilliant achievement for them to stay up in the first place. You know, that's all you need in the first season is to stay in the league, but at the moment they haven't had the first few months of the season that they would like, and that's a great win, so they'll be coming here on the road, certainly with a bit of confidence. And one thing to bear in mind as well, they might be down the bottom of the table, they've only lost one in their last four, so that's something that they can take confidence coming into the game. Yeah, and as I say, they play a three at the back, they're a big side as well, a big physical side, but they do play some nice football. Aaron Moyn, central midfielder, I heard someone say last week that he potentially is the best central midfielder outside the big clubs, which, you know, with the greatest respect to the Bournemouth players, he really makes them tick. I think I'm right and say he missed one of the two games against Bournemouth last season, but he's a real playmaker. He can make things happen for them. So if he's on the money tomorrow, then he'll be a problem for Bournemouth for sure. But yeah, they'll come with a bit of confidence. The goals for them have not been easy to come by. I think I'm right and say no striker has scored for them so far this season. Most of their goals have come from defenders. Big Zanka, the Danish centre half scored on Saturday. So a lot of their goals, I think their top scorer has got two, which tells you all you need to know. And they've only scored two, I think, in one Premier League game this season, and that was the win away at Wolves. So yeah, they're a bit light on goals, but from that point of view, they do have threats, and Aaron Moyn, I would say, is the one that is easily recognisable with his bald head. He's the one that Bournemouth fans would watch out for. And from Bournemouth's point of view, it does look like Dan Gosling's going to miss the game, but it'll be great to have Jefferson learn my back, won't it? With the greatest of respect to get into him. I don't know how much he could have impacted the game in terms of stopping city threats, because a lot of them came down the wide areas. But it's great to have him back. Obviously he'll be fit and firing and ready to go. Two big home games coming up now over the course of the next few days. So yeah, he'll be back in centre midfield, whether it's Lewis Cook or Sermon that goes with him. If I was a betting man, I would think it would be Lewis Cook. But of course he got left out in the previous home game for Dan Gosling, who now is not available. What are the choices at the back in terms of which formation they go with as we were saying earlier with Tyrone Ming's as a third centre half, or do they go back to the flat four? And obviously David Brooks, I would expect to come back in as well. I don't think it would be too long before we see Junior Stanislaus from the start as well. He's been working his way back to fitness. Ryan Frazier has obviously had a tough run of games as well. So I wouldn't be wholly surprised to see Junior start tomorrow night as well. And how important is tomorrow night's game for the Cherries? Has there really been that bad? It doesn't go well on paper, does it? I think it's important because you just can't get onto a trot where you're not getting any points at all. We mentioned before about the significance of not getting anything at Newcastle. I think the one thing, Eddie, there were two points really that Eddie was keen to make today ahead of the game, which was expectations have to remain in check because everyone will expect Bournemouth to win tomorrow night because of the respective starts to the season. And the other thing he was, he wanted the crowd to play a huge part. The message he was putting out was that we're really going to need the crowd on side. If things don't go well early on, taking a while to break through, stay with the team, that's the message he was keen to put out. But you're right, in terms of having force-accessive defeats, you need to check that momentum at some point and swing things in the opposite direction. The counter, I guess, to that is that as you say, they have been playing well. It's not as if they've had scratching around for rhythm and momentum.  But they have. Liverpool have come on Saturday and then Wolves and Brighton. So actually, if you almost forget the last four games and look at the next four coming up, Huddersfield Wolves and Brighton with Liverpool in the middle, you need some momentum from that. You need some positivity. These are games now that they've got to find some points from, particularly with the little run of away games coming up after Christmas as well. So yeah, the expectation will be coming ways. And hopefully, yeah, it sort of starts things back in the right direction again. Well, that's certainly going to be a very exciting game. That's all we've got time for today. We'll be back on Friday to preview the game here against Liverpool on Saturday. Thanks for joining us.


This is a video about the verb note. But before I begin, I respectfully acknowledge that I'm standing on the unceded traditional territory of the Comox First Nation. Now about note. Note is a verb that allows you to do comments. So for instance, if I wanted to add 2 plus 4 and I decided to put a comment, I can put in quote comment. Oh, I'll just say addition. And now when I return note, it's just going to do the 2 plus 4 part of it and return that. And this will just become a comment for posterity saying that what I'm doing there is addition. Not a big surprise. But note has other tricks up its sleeve. So I'm going to say multi. It could be anything. It's just a single argument, but what it does is as soon as I hit that it takes me right over to the left margin and I can go line, and I can go line, and then when I finally decided I've had enough putting in lines, I do a right parentheses and I'm back to where I was before. So it's a way of doing a multi-line comment in J. Now, I don't find it the most useful thing. I said before in a previous video that I find NB period much more useful in terms of commenting, but what's fascinating about note is the way it's defined to do all this work. So you see all the things it's doing here. If it's given two arguments, 2 plus 4 on one side addition on the other, it just returns the left argument, the answer to left argument. If it's got one argument, it does this fancy stuff and gives you a multi-line. So you'd expect something kind of wild or probably pretty complicated. Maybe a lot of lines have used other languages. When I type in note and I don't give it any argument and hit return, it gives me the definition of note. And there it is. And when I didn't know much, J, I'd look at a definition like this and just go, I have three colons, I have four zeros, I have a dollar sign, I have two quotation marks, I have a left bracket and a number three. And that is a program that will do what note does. And it does. But you kind of have to know what you're looking at. So let's take a look at note. And when I look at note in this definition, I'm going to take a look at this specific colon to start with. And what I see here is on one side, I've got a verb, and on this side, I've got a verb. So I have a verb and another verb, and I have a colon. And when I have a verb on one side of a colon and verb on the other side of a colon, it means something. And what it means is I am defining a new verb composed of these two verbs. Well, let's just take a quick look and we can play around a bit and try and figure out how it uses these two verbs to make a new verb. So if I take a verb like square, this is the verb for square. If I just put in a number there, it's going to give me the square of the number. So that's a verb. And then I do the colon on its own. And I'm going to do the left bracket again. And now I'm going to give it an argument, say 6. And when I hit this, it looks like what it's going to do is it's going to execute this verb. It's going to square it. But when I give it two arguments, so I can do a 4 here and a 6 here, and in between I've got this verb, it returns 4. Well, when it's got two verbs, it's working on this one. And what that verb does, if I do 5, anything, it's always going to return the number to its left. That's what that verb does. So going back here, now we've established that this would be a monadic side. So monadic verbs, they only take one argument. And this would be a dyadic verb. It takes two arguments. So on this side, you've got a dyadic verb. And on this side, you've got a monadic verb. And our next part is going to be on this colon here. Because we're pretty comfortable with what's happening on the dyadic side. But what's happening on the monadic side now? The format we've got here is we've got a noun, like the 3, and we've got another noun, which is this string here. And now we've got a colon between the two nouns. So it's different. It's a different format than what we saw between the v colon v. Now it's a noun colon noun. And that's significant. That changes what the colon does. It's still going to do a definition. It's going to do it in a different way. So what is the way that it's going to do it? Well, a clue. And I'll kind of come through this backhanded. Because the language has already defined a few things for you. So if I type in the word noun, I get zero. And if I type in the word adverb, that's another part of speech for j, I get one. Conjunction, I get two. Verb, I get three. And if it was a dyad, which is a verb that takes two arguments, I get four. So now, looking back at this again, this three is what tells me that I'm defining a verb. So this whole side here is a definition of a verb. And it's defined, it knows it's a verb because of the three. And the rest of this is what the definition is. So that string is the definition of a verb, which brings us to this last colon, that one there. So what's happening with that colon? Well, let's play around a little bit with it. So back to j. And let's start out with the zero, zero, shape, I don't know, four, five, six. I just get the next line. It's like nothing happened. Well, something did happen. Because if I type four, five, six, I get four, five, six back. But because I had zero, zero, shape, it means I'm not going to get four, five, six back. I'm going to get zero items and zero rows, which is going to look like I got nothing. So zero, zero shape is a way to make sure that you don't get anything back. It's sort of like a no op. It's going to do work, but it's going to nullify it. It's not going to give you any results. It's just a quick way of saying, I just discard whatever it was going to throw me. I don't care about it. It's nothing. It's nothing to me. Okay, so that takes care of the zero, zero, shape part. What about the zero colon zero part? Let's look at zero, colon, zero. Now we know zero is a noun and zero is a noun, so we're in the noun, colon, noun form. So we're back to this form here. Noun, colon, noun. And because we've got zero, we know we're defining a noun. Nouns are zero. So we're defining a noun, but we don't have a string here anymore. So where we had a string before, which was this between the two quote marks, we don't have that anymore. We just got a zero, a zero on its own. And what a zero on its own does is it says, stop everything. What's the next line? And I am going to define this as a noun, because that's what the first zero tells me. And any line I want to put in here, I'm going to keep feeding it. So it's a way of doing multi-line things until when I want to stop, I hit write parentheses, and now I'm back to where I was. Now notice that it echoed back. It said the line I typed in, and then it typed it back. How would I get rid of that? How indeed you ask? Well, the answer is zero, zero dollar sign. And now I'm going to get the same effect. I've entered multi-lines in, but now when I close it off, it's going to take those two lines and fire them into the void. They never existed because that zero, zero shape is now under effect. It's going to be able to absolutely nullify whatever I've typed in. So it's a way of doing a multi-line comment. So now when I look at note, and I look at this, you go, wow, it's amazing that that set of characters could create a verb that does that. But the way it does it is if I gave it two arguments, it's always going to take the left argument, which is the part that I want to execute, and if I only give it one argument, it's going to say take whatever you want, make it into a noun, multi-lines, and when you're done, you hit the right parentheses, and I'm not going to do anything with it. And that's note. I always found that pretty amazing, and it's a mind-bending, but it's the way that J works. It's entirely consistent with all the definitions, and that's why it works. But pretty amazing the stuff you can do with it.


Here are seven soccer drills for kids to improve your basic skills, first touch and passing. I've been playing for 30 years and I still work on the basics and you should too. If you don't know about me, I used to be a huge underachiever, but through obsessive self-improvement, I found my success. Earned a college scholarship, played for my national football team, a YouTube channel with over 100 million views, I've helped players worldwide, and I'd love to help you improve faster and achieve more. If you like this content, check out the Soccer Success Planner, you can download it for free, there's a link in the description below, and for advanced training, check out the Online Soccer Academy. If you like this content, check out the Soccer Success Planner, you can download it for free, there's a link in the description below, and for advanced training, check out the Online Soccer Academy.