Studies of the University of York. So, I will tell you who I am first. I am Dan, as has been mentioned. Last two years I have spent studying electronics at the University of York. I decided that was a bad idea so I have sort of stopped that. Taking a year out when I go back I'll be doing computer science hopefully. But for now I am working at arm so at least they trust me to know what we are talking about when it comes to this. So, why would anyone want to build such a trivially small... Oh no, first of all, sorry. I'm claiming this is the world's smallest, lowest spec PC. And so just in case you didn't leave me, these three comparisons at the top here are sort of FPGA utilisation numbers. So, the RAM in this computer, which is only 64 bits, actually takes up only a third of the space in the FPGA that I need for one of the switch debouncers, which tells you two things, I guess. One, I've got not a lot of RAM, and two, the switches are really bouncy. But the entire implementation in the FPGA only takes up about the size of two and a half of the debouncers. So, overall it's pretty small as well. And I've sort of tried to compare it to an ARM Cortex N0+, which is the smallest ARM microcontroller that you can get. These numbers might be a bit iffy because I'm comparing FPGA utilisation to gate count, which is a bad idea. But I reckon it's at least smaller than a third of ARM's smallest core, so it's pretty small. And that led to a bit of a silly comparison. If you had an HDTV and that represented the CPU in your iPhone 5S, it's got about two million pixels on an HDTV, this thing would take up nine of them on the same TV. So, it's pretty small. And I've also compared it to the size of the RAM on the world's first stored program computer. And, as you can see, it's tiny. So, that was the SCCM which had 1024 bits of RAM. So, it's a fairly small core. Why would anybody want to build a computer so small? So, when I got my first computer, this is the sort of thing that I saw. There was a big black box in the middle and it did some magic stuff. And I had no idea what was going on inside it. And that was really annoying. I think I had the keyboard on the mouse the right way around when I used it. I didn't know what was going on in there. And that really annoyed me. So, shortly after I got that computer, my dad installed QBasic on it for me. It was a Windows 95 machine. And I started learning to write basic. And so, this picture grew in my mind of what was going on inside. This is when I was about eight or nine or something. And so, I kept my little head of program in various other languages and eventually assembly language. And so, I thought, yeah, I figured out how it works now. By the time I was about 15. So, this was the image that I had in my head. I thought, yeah, I reckon I know how a computer works now. I'm not going to explain that in detail, but that's a sort of generic CPU might look like this. So, I said to myself, I think I know how these things work now. I reckon I could make my own. I said could make my own though. So, back when I was 15, my pocket money wouldn't cover a computer that I would know how to build at the time. So, I was thinking of, you know, I'd need a mountain of 74 series logic chips or transistors or relays or something. So, I kind of gave up on the idea. But then, a few years later, when I got to university, I started studying electronics, I did a VHDL course. So, I was teaching how to use VHDL to program FPGAs. And so, suddenly I knew how to build a computer and I had the resources to do it. Because I could just go and buy an FPGA and program that. I didn't need a mountain of hardware. So, I drew this diagram. I'm not going to explain that in detail either. I've also made the mistake of putting an architecture diagram in my slides. Yeah, I came up with this idea for just a really simple CPU that I could design just to prove to myself that I do actually know how a computer works. So, this was inspired by this, which I've already mentioned. This is the SSEM, more commonly known as the Manchester Baby. So, this is a replica which is in the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester of the world's first computer, effectively. But it had this really cool little thing in the middle here. This is a CRT which displays a grid of dots and dashes and that represents the entire memory of the system. So, you can see your program loaded in on that screen. And in fact, there's another CRT somewhere over on this side which is actually the storage for the program.  It scans the entire memory out to the phosphor on the front of the screen and then that's detected and sent back round. So, it's a sort of primitive delay line memory. I thought that was a really cool idea. So, we'll see right in the middle of my design there's this grid here. 8x8 grid of LEDs which is going to represent my entire RAM. So, I went and bought this which is a Papillio 1500K board I think and one of those which is like two quid off of eBay. That was pretty much the reason for making the memory size 8x8 was because I could get a super cheap module that already did it and I knew how to use it and I could easily connect it to my FPGA. So, I wrote some BSL code and to my surprise it worked. So, there it is. Thanks, bye. This is actually, this is version 2. I hope you don't think I'm lying to you but this is not the original. Somebody broke the original one. So, I took this to the UK Maker Faire in Newcastle and York Hackspace was unfortunate enough to be placed in an area where the floor that you're walking on sort of built up a static charge in you as you walk across it and back when I had version 1, the Papillio was actually mounted to the back of the lid on that screw there and so a fellow York Hackspace member was walking along the floor and then came over to this and said, oh look at this cool thing. Touch that and completely killed it. Which was a bit annoying, but... He actually and Bob actually killed the Papillio board. I don't know exactly what he did to it, but I had to get a new one anyway. So, that's version 2. That prompted the addition of some extra features. I should thank him. Of course, it's open source. You can go and download this by a Papillio, by a 2 quid LED matrix off of eBay and make your own one of these if you wish. Also, another member of York Hackspace got quite interested in this project. Nick Moriarty wrote in JavaScript an emulator for this machine and then I wrote a front end for it, which is why it doesn't look very good.  Create some programs all inside your browser. Now, the controversial slide. Unfortunately, this is how I see FPGA programming for hobbyists. I'm not the next Randall Munro. It's clear, but... When I look at things like Arduino and Raspberry Pi and all of the similar things around that, you see great communities of people who know what they're talking about mostly and are willing to welcome you in, give you advice. But unfortunately, for hobbyists at least, there isn't, at least from my point of view, I don't see quite the same community, which reminds me a bit. This is changing, so the Papillio is great. It's not super cheap, but it's also really difficult to find good resources on the internet that tell you how to program it. So that was what put me off initially. When I did the VHDL course at uni, I decided to buy one and try to learn how to use it. So, round to over. So you only have eight bytes of memory and you need to store your entire program in that and the data that it uses. So it can be a bit of a challenge. So there's a couple of programs there. So the first program that I wrote was effectively just a counter from one to six and then looped back round. So depending on how long you ran the program, it would generate around a number between one and six. Hence, it's a dirol program. It would just store the result in the last three bits of the last line in the round there. But it's a really simple architecture. There's about 30 instructions and each one is a five-bit opcode and a three-bit address, obviously points to one of these other locations in memory. So it's quite easy. I won't go in depth much into these programs, but you can go and have a play with it in the simulator if you want to learn exactly how they work. But, yeah, you have to play a game called Extreme Code Golf when you're programming this. So I was chatting to some friends from York Hackspace and I said, I don't think you can fit a Cylon program in eight bytes. And they mostly agreed. So a Cylon program is a, well, a Cylon is a monster with a scanning LED animation on it, in case you don't know. So I thought it would be a challenge to get one of these lines to do a sort of scrolling backwards and forwards animation. And it is quite difficult, but fortunately, I've got it here, the machine does have a mode where you can view the one and only internal register that it's got, which does make it a little bit easier. So you just have to make the value in the register to do the animation that you want. But still it's difficult to fit it into eight bytes. And so this is a program that Nick wrote, actually, which proves you can do it in eight bytes. But there's some nasty tricks played. So you'll notice jump one is the first instruction, which is just going to jump from there to there, which would have happened anyway. So that's a no-op. And load one, by that point in the program, at least after the first iteration, is also a no-op. And you have to do that because each loop that moves the LED from one side to the other takes up three bytes. And each test needs one byte of data to check to see if it's hit the end. So that's already eight bytes, and you haven't got any space to put an instruction in to jump back to the start of the first loop. So your data gets executed as if it's instructions, which means it has to be no-op equivalent, which is a bit of an A as well. There's also, here's another example of some more extreme code golf. So I thought, that's pretty cool, but I want this to interface with the real world. So there is a GPIO connector on the side here. So I thought, can I get the same thing to happen on a bunch of LEDs on a breadboard? And you kind of can, but it's a bit awkward. So when you do this, the LED doesn't move at the same speed. So it'll go that way really quickly and then move really slowly that way. Because one of the operations that makes it shift has to be implemented outside of the machine because, well, you need an extra instruction in each loop to write the value out to the GPIO port. But they're already taking up three instructions each. So if each one needed an extra instruction in it, then you'd have no space for your extra data. And so in this case, I've used this IO swap instruction, which writes the value out and reads the value in at the same time. And so the other rotation is actually implemented by a bunch of wires connecting the outputs to the inputs, but shifted, which is a bit of a cheat, I know. And it does mean it takes two iterations through that loop to actually do the shift. So that's why it's a bit slower. Yeah, so the challenge is involved in programming it. But it can be fun. I like code golf. So some people have said to me, oh, that'd be really great for teaching computer science. And they're probably right. So if you start teaching someone how to program a computer from a really high level, then they'll probably understand it after a while. But like with me, it took me seven or eight years to figure out exactly what was going on underneath. So yeah, I'm sure there's people at Intel who couldn't even tell you. There's probably one or two engineers at Intel that know exactly what's going on in there, if that, I reckon. But with something like this, which is a lot more tangible and easier to understand, you could explain all the concepts to someone fairly quickly. And they'll be able to understand it even if they've never really seen such a thing before, which I think could be a really useful tool. I've actually made that take a lot less time than I thought it would. So that's the end. Thank you very much.


The market sentiment surprisingly I think a little bit more bullish than last week and we had quite a few bulls this week. Socks just that were the demand just beat the supply and I thought that was pretty cool. It's just nice to see it definitely makes me more, I mean tomorrow is not going to be that exciting it's going to be the three day holiday weekend. But it makes me more excited for the next week. And this holiday weekend might come just in time right because we kind of need a little reset like, you know, like the markets just starting to get a little bit better. Nice three day weekend, people come back ready to go so I'm excited for next week. Especially because we kind of heated up heated up a little this week. I mean, pretty much even amount of bulls is bear still not a lot of movers like in previous webinars. It's a market close tomorrow. No, the market close Monday. Yeah, market close Monday but tomorrow it's going to be like super light.  So, anyway, but it'll kind of be a nice reset I think you know like Mark it's just starting to get better and then everyone's forced to take three days off. And people are going to come back and they're going to remember oh it's just getting better. I don't know. I think I think the holiday is going to be up, you know, it's going to have a bullish outlook where sometimes it's bearish right when when things are just getting going and then holiday weekend kind of kills the momentum. You know I don't think that I don't think you know that would be kind of a negative impact I think we're going to have a positive impact on this weekend. So, I mean that's just my guess, but yeah, I just a whole lot of stuff hanging around and we'll definitely get into some of these. But, yeah, like, I think that the like I even put on, you know, a couple slides in the future here. I think that the lungs are in control. And that's because it doesn't feel like there's enough range for the shorts on the downside and everything is kind of dry squeezing and when I when I typed this out I kind of giggled because I was like dry squeezing. But, like, it's kind of what it feels like we're not getting a whole lot of, you know, like wet squeezing which would be juicy and fun and to the upside and just explosive range. So anything like that nothing right it's funny term funny lingo and using her, but you know we're not we're nothing's exciting nothing super juicy nothing's just flamboyantly explosive. It's just, you know, it's just things aren't taking right and and they're squeezing up and it's, there's not much to the squeezes it squeezes up and then they'll fall down.  You know it's just like the stocks aren't you know they're just they're not being, they're not really fading that much. And it. It's not, it's not giving longs anything to be excited about but um, it's probably easier to be along right now than it is to be a short. Easier. Not necessarily more profitable but easier. Now continue with this other this slide out of order to some kind of on the subject. This week is still lower it is growing I should have I should have actually moved this, I should have actually moved that a little, a little bit more back. We definitely have more range than last week. Probably more where we're at. I feel like the control is actually in the long sport right and it seems kind of odd because we are kind of dead. But like it feels like the longs are kind of winning on the few stocks that we have to play with, because it seems like the shorts are a lot more desperate than the longs, like the longs are, you know, they're they're they're not getting like a lot of like a lot of the capital has left, I think long capital is kind of left, like myself included I'm not really participating that hard. Like I bought, I bought two I had two winners this week I bought GOB X and already be X and, and I won on both of them but like, not a whole lot and I wasn't excited about them. Like, just you know, like, it was, how do I say a boring win but like I knew that like, I knew that that was all there was to give so I wasn't going to let myself get back. And I feel like, you know, a lot more long graders are behaving that way like, like, I notice Harry he's showing up later Terry and I used to wake up at one in the morning and now we're both kind of being a little bit lazy or sorry, one in the morning my time that would be 7am market time. So I'm waking up like 30 minutes before the open. And that was a gradual process but it's because it's just gradually getting crappier.     And so, like, it's just shorts kind of like squeezing over themselves but longs aren't really ready to engage yet. And that's why we're not seeing the fall here right in order to get followed through kind of momentum movers. You need you need to you need both elements of demand and in previous webinars I talked about the two you know there's two aspects of demand right the aspect of shorts covering and long spine and the and you need both to have momentum if you only have one, it's going to fizzle. Like, you know, like in order for momentum movers to happen shorts have to be in the game. And longs have to be squeezing them. And you have to have that cycle to where longs are confident that oh yeah we just push but shorts are still trapped I'm going to keep buying and as long as long as keep buying and short keep shorting. You know it will keep going up and that's and that's that's how these low flow, that's how these low float movers are going right now but right now we're missing an element of that right longs are not excited and they have no reason to be excited if you look at how longs are towards the overall market it's concerned I think it's like I saw some stat on it's like the worst open in 3040 5060 years or some some number like that is literally the worst open of the market in a very long time.


In our previous videos we have explored how polymers are formed and equations for polymerization reactions. In this video we will explore in more detail some different polymers and their specific uses as well as the problems associated with polymers. As you now know polymers are long chain organic molecules made by repeating monomer units. There are a number of natural polymers in life such as rubber and even in our own body we have natural polymers such as proteins, carbohydrates and DNA to name just a few. We will focus the rest of this tutorial on synthetic polymers. The common name for synthetically made polymers is plastics which are used very frequently in our day to day lives from simple packaging to complex structural building materials. However the increased use of plastics in our homes leads to nearly one quarter of all the solid waste being plastic. Some of this can be recycled to minimize the effects on our environment but a long term goal for many chemists is to develop more biodegradable plastics which would naturally break down in our environments. Here are some specific examples of polymers and their common uses. Polyethene used for carrier bags and sheet plastics. High density polyethene used for drain pipes, water bottles and containers. Polystyrene used in packaging. Polypropene used for bottle caps, plastic bottles and plastic pipes. Polychloroeethene often known as PVC and is used for windows and door frames, plastic hinges and bottles. Poly1122 tetrafluoroethene also known as PTFE which is a non-stick coating on frying pans as well as being used in bearings and other low friction surfaces. Kevlar is a unique polymer in that it form bulletproof vests and jackets. Nylon is used in textiles, clothing and carpets. As you can see polymers play a huge role in our day-to-day lives and their use is wide and varied owing to their unique individual properties. It is important to understand that most of the alkene monomers used to make polymers are obtained in some part from crude oil and therefore it is critical that we recycle plastics to conserve our natural resources for the future manufacture of these polymers. There are also big problems associated with the disposal of polymers. The biggest problem as mentioned above is that polymers are non-biodegradable which means that microorganisms cannot naturally break them down. Disposal of polymers by burning or incineration is a possibility as this generates heat which can be used to generate electricity. However the burning of polymers produces many toxic gases which themselves can damage the environment and cause pollution. Now at the end of this lesson you should have an appreciation of the importance of polymers be able to name some key polymers along with their uses and also describe the problems associated with polymers. So if you have any questions why not check out our FuSchool app as well. Until next time!


Good morning, everyone. The title for this presentation is OpenStack CIC for everyone else. Before I start this presentation, well, given that during the morning we have an amazing demo for CICD, I just want to just let you know that this is something a little bit different that we share during the morning, but it's a little bit related to what we try to do. During the first slide of this presentation, I am going to walk through the problem statement that has a developer face, so hopefully you enjoyed and found this useful for you. Well, my name is Victor Morales. I work for Intel Size 2011. I am an OC cloud engineer, OC, maybe you have heard about that, OC extends for OpenStack Innovation Center. Basically, it's a collaboration between Rackspace and Intel in order to try to make, to improve the enterprise readiness for OpenStack. I am also an OpenStack GDL co-founder. I'm born in Guadalajara, Mexico, so there is an amazing community there which we are trying to collaborate. Now in my case, my participation is more remotely, I am still trying to be present in most of the sessions, and, well, my passion is obviously system, doing programming. I love to type different programs in different languages. Given that, I have been in different companies and I have been seeing the same principle, the same things. So basically, as a programmer, you start with a solution or try to, you try to provide a solution for a simple, for a company or your customer, or maybe you have an idea. You want to implement something new, you want to innovate in a specific areas, you want to do something creative in that specific way. So you start with that idea or with that solution, and you elaborate a lot of things. You basically, you grab the information from the customer, you start to make your analysis, you develop the application, you create a couple of tests, you do a lot of things in that specific area. So yeah, you have the application, you test it, you deploy it, maybe in this case you use OpenStack, and everything is perfect, right? The customer may be happy, or maybe that new idea is something that you are creating something cool. But once that application is over there in production, and you have a lot of things there, maybe the customer is so happy and he wants to add new things. And those new things definitely probably could compromise the existence or the current pictures that the application has. So the application is still fragile, and maybe adding these new things could be broken some other parts of the application. So you have to be careful in order to fix those things. Or maybe you only have to fix a specific book, but again, this application is fragile, so you have to be careful of doing whatever change that you have to do in this application. So thanks for a couple of guys that developed these technologies. Firstly, we have continuous integration, and continuous delivery, or continuous deployment. Continuous integration is a software development practice, which basically is focused in having continuously integrated the work that the developers are doing, and what I mean for continuous integrating those things. That means that also is running a couple of tests, ensuring that it is not breaking anything. So this is one of the benefits, like you are ensuring that in every single commit or change that the developers are doing, you are verifying that it is not broken anything. But on the other hand, we have continuous delivery. Continuous delivery and continuous deployment is pretty much similar. Both the idea is to have all these changes, all these changes that the developers are doing, ready for in a stage where you can, as a final decision, take those changes and deploy it in your servers. So this is nice, and these methodologies have been there. You know that Martin Flower who basically wrote these quotes, they have been doing a lot of research on that. So great, we have the solution we don't have to remain till the well, but what is the problem? Well, the problem is in the current market, we have several solutions, all of them, in this case all of these are open source solutions. For example, in the left side, we have a couple of book trackers, like a Dreadmine track, Book Seal and Mantis book tracker. In the middle, we have a couple of continuous integration tools. Just a few of them is Jenkins and Trevi CI. On the left hand, we have system control versions, and the problem with this is given this amount of tools and different possible solutions, you have to figure out the way to connect all the single things. It is not easier, it is something that you have to spend time to investigate, you have to figure out which is the best tool that fits all your necessities.  So that is the main purpose, that's the problem that I face when I was trying to create my application for the tests, for my masters. So for me, I have an idea, like, well, what about if I would be possible if I can just put an idea of the solution, maybe let's say less than one day in production, but not only putting the idea of the problem there in the production, it would be amazing if you can maintain that application after the deployment cycle and keeping all these things or this fragile application there during the whole application's life cycle. So I think that most of the companies have these things. So for the solution of this problem, I try to divide in two simple things. One of the phases of this project, if I consider, was the analysis that I made in the several different components, and the second phase of this project was how to integrate all these components and having a single solution. So for the components perspective, I consider just a couple of components that I consider crucial for having a continuous integration tool. In this case, I consider an application automation server, which is responsible for orchestrating things, the version of control to store the different versions of the application, a build system, which is just packaging the application and having a release unit, a book tracking system, just something that you can track all the problems or the new enhancement that you want to do it, notification systems, something to just let you know that if something is broken or someone has been reported a failure, and account analysis reports. During the analysis that we did later, we consider that some of these tools depends on the languages that you are using, so for example, in the case of the build system, if you are using for your application Java, maybe you need to use Maven, Grail, and for example, something different like if you use Python, C-sharp, or whatever application. So that's the reason that some of them we didn't consider for the first phase. For every single component, we try to just focus in five things, well, in this case, sorry, in four things. The first thing, we consider that it will necessary to have the proper license. I only consider open source licenses for these reasons, but it's good to know that we have to pay attention what is the license that we are using for this application. There are a lot of options or things in the market, but if you have more things to offer for these different components, it will be amazing, so we try to evaluate every single component in what are the features that it's offering. Level integration, what it means for level integration is, yes, it's nice to have great component with a lot of features, but it's also important that this component has the ability to connect with other components, so that's the reason that we consider the level integration for this one, and the last thing, and not less important, that those components need to be insolvable. That means, yeah, there are many solutions in the market where you can only, they are exposing the services and you can connect them, but it will be better if you can have all these things in your own infrastructure. So I will go through every one of these components, it is not too much. So basically for the automation server, I'm considering Jenkins. Jenkins has been there many years ago. Actually they changed the name from Hudson to Jenkins, the license is an MIT. We have been using the OpenStack community for a long time, it is reliable. The way to install things is pretty, they consider it easier, but yeah, after a couple of changes, yeah, it is not as easy as we expect. The good thing about Jenkins is like it has a lot of plugins, you know, the flexibility is amazing. We can also connect notifications systems, it's nice to have with the connectivity with Git, GVS, version, anyway, Jenkins is a good actor here. By your hand, talking about the book tracking system, well, at the end, we use this specific article published in Wikipedia to make the analysis of the different versions. Rayman is offering a lot of features, it is more newer than others, again, the license is GPL version 2, which is also good to have this version. One of the amazing things is like you can also configure different things and you can connect with Jenkins. There are different notifications interfaces like email, add-on, MPP, which you can use with Pitching, obviously you can do a couple of tweets there. For version control, well, the answer was pretty simple, we use Git, why we use it, because it's a distributed system, it is used by the Linux kernel development, also for OpenStack, it is distributed, it's small, it's fast, it's also a new trend for developers, which is also nice. I am also mentioning that in the version control software, I use Garry, I know that Garry is more for doing reviews and doing basically cover reviews, but something that we discovered once we were working in this thing is like Garry is offering inside of the server Git repository, so for that reason, we consider it as a version of control, so what we did in the community is basically we are replicating the changes from the Garry servers to the GitHub, so for that reason, Garry is here considered like a version of control, even when it is more like a code review system, so again the license for Garry is Apache, well, I mentioned that it has a Git integration, so for different databases, which is nice, well, it's an active community which is doing a lot of changes. The first architecture that I propose for integrate all these components, I could just consider four servers, well, three of them are hosting the different components that I mentioned before, one is for Garry, the second one is for Jenkins and RedMind, and if you notice, just three of them has a floating IP, so that means that they have the ability to external access to the world. The third one only contains a database. I know that this is a poor architecture, but the idea is like this project is start collecting all the good practices and having better distribution and things like that. So, well, all these things are just related with the components, so for the next phase, I consider the way to deploy these things, and the way to deploy these components, I choose the deployment tool, Terraform, the reason that I choose Terraform, basically, it is because Terraform is a cloud-anostic tool, so it's very nice if you have a chance to take a look at Terraform, basically you describe it in a clarity way, like, okay, I want these, these, these, all these things, and Terraform figured out how to deal with the resources, so every time that I have to explain to my colleagues what is Terraform, it is more like having Puppet, but using Puppet in a cloud, so usually in Puppet, you describe what are the things that you want in your server, and in this case, Terraform, you describe the resources that you need for your application, so it's pretty nice. I really like Terraform. So what are the things that you have to do? I try to do simple. There is a couple of external environments, variable environments that you need, obviously the way that you tell Terraform to connect to OpenStack, so all these things are just specific things for, for, for this application, and just simple type Terraform apply, and this is going to connect to your server, and it's going to deploy all these four servers, and it's going to create the security groups, the floor in IPs, the router, the post provisioning, everything. So I will try to do a demo. I know that this sometimes is hard to, to, to do in, in life, but let's see if that works. Hopefully this is big enough to. So basically I'm going to do Terraform run. In this case, it is going to check with my cloud provider, in which in this case it's OSIC, so it's going to check with the OSIC cloud, it's going to check if all the resources has been there, and what is the current status. It's going to try to check what is the difference with the things that I am proposing. If there is a difference, it's going to say, well, in this case, there is no changes, just because I have been deployed those things before, so I'm going to destroy it. Really? Okay, so maybe, maybe if I do it bigger. Well, given that I am destroying the resources that I have there, is waiting for a confirmation, so I'm going to destroy everything from the, from the server, from the cloud. So in this case, it's going to remove all the components. In this case, it's the security groups, the network, the subnet, the floating IPs, all the things that I have, it is going to be destroyed. And what I want to show after the addition of these resources is the way, that is the easy way to deploy all these things. So hopefully this is not going to take too much time. Okay, it's destroying the floating IPs, it's destroying the router in this case. It is almost there, security groups. So which is nice, it's also following the cloud computing methodology, like that you, you only use the resources by demand. So basically, your application, you don't need to keep all these things there. You can destroy the resources and basically you are not paying any, any more money to the, to the cloud provider. I promise that it is, it is almost there. I don't know why it's taking a little bit more, oh yeah, there is it. So for now, I don't have any resources. Just the only thing that I want to show here is, like, how easy is to, to deploy this development infrastructure. So again, is using Terraform, apply. And that's it. That's the only thing that you have to, to type. In this case, is it is going to tell you all the, the details of your application. So something that we can take a look. I just want to just look, work through the source code here. A little bit of the, the files that are deployed there is a couple of Terraform files. The only thing that you have to modify in this case is the variable stuff where it contains all the details that are used for your cloud provider. In this case, obviously from different cloud providers, they are using different flavors or different images. The external category is completely different. So it is something that you have to consider for, for, for your deployment. Obviously the passwords are here, so it is not too much secure. But anyway, at the end, if I am looking at the, well, at the end, once that everything has been provisioned, the output, it is showing the floating IPs that you can use to connect your, your services. Unfortunately, the last images used in, in this specific cloud provider, it is having some issues, so I am sure that it, I am not able to access to them, but my initial test, it was working. So it is something I need to figure out later. So continuing with the demo. So try to see if there is a way to, okay. So going back to the demo, oops, yep, sorry. Well, that was the demo. I have a couple of future plans for this specific project. One of the things you notice, this is a, this has a poor architecture. Obviously, it, it requires a lot of things to do there. We need to add a couple of load balancers, clusters, make more resilient application. The security improvements, again, I am just using plain text, so maybe it would be nice to increase the passwords to do better distributed way to, to maybe also distributing the, the networks and that way also improve the security stuff. Talking about cloud providers, given that Terraform is used, is able to communicate with different cloud providers. It would be nice if this can be tested in AWS or, I don't know, Google Compute. And the last thing is a mutable server. For this case, it's the same pattern that Metric Flower exposed. Basically, instead of deploying an instance and after the installation, you modify that instance, installing new things, the idea is like having an image for every single service. So, so in that way, the only thing that you have to take care of there, the installation, is just the configuration fast of all these things. So, basically, it's all that I have. All these changes has been submitted to one of the internal OpenStack projects, in these cases. OS or PTS tools contribute. The changes are there. You can go there and you can use it and modify, including things. Actually, this is more a call for action. It would be nice if you share your experiences, share something in common, and maybe do it more better. I know that a lot of people will benefit of those tools. So, please contribute these things and share your experiences. It's basically all that I have. I don't know if you have questions or comments or suggestions. All of these things are welcome. This is described by my company. Well, this is the link. If there is no other question, thanks a lot for attending the session and I want to say...


The other thing that you really bring out in many of your writing is this need for humility, which I really applauded and this feeling that you have, which I keep coming back to, is this feeling of, and it's difficult to get into, get in touch with, is this feeling that I don't know, I really don't know. One of my questions though is, humility doesn't seem to be something one can do. You know, if people try to do it, it becomes a sort of weird inverted pride, and even a kind of power play when people try, you know, it's so often a kind of trick. And yet I think you're right about humility and not knowing. I wondered whether there's more you could say about how can we get into that place of humility and not knowing, because I do think we need more and more not knowing and more and more forgiving our sort of mutual sillinesses about thinking we know things. Yeah, that's a very astute question. It's true that when you pursue humility, usually you end up with a counterfeit that doesn't actually fool people who don't want to be fooled. It only fools yourself in the end. And then you emit what I've heard in Buddhism called the stink of enlightenment. So, yeah, you cannot achieve humility, which should make sense. You know, it's not something that you can achieve that that's actually not humble. It's something that happens as a result of seeing more and more of the reality of who you are and what the world is. It's just a result of seeing truth. And how do you see the truth. For me, usually it's when it's shown to me in ways that I can't ignore in ways that obliterate my defenses against it. What are my defenses against it they're the constructs of self. So, but it's not that you can't do anything. It also requires a willingness to see what's true and to hold that above anything else. And that is I think the foundation of Buddhist meditation practice where you sit down with a resolve to be in reality to observe what is humility comes from that. And it comes from that. It's not that in and of itself, but that resolve, that willingness. Then when things from beyond what you knew come into your view, you accept them, you don't resist them, even though they might disrupt, disturb and disrupt and dissolve precious identity. Precious stories and myths about what the world is. Like it's a, it's a, it's a letting go. I mean, somewhere I think you talk about really struck me is that sometimes a path to humility is humiliation. I don't mean being humiliated by someone in that kind of aggressive way. I mean the humiliations that life brings to you that shows you that you don't know that shows you that you were wrong and so on. I don't know whether you would agree with that. One of the past humiliation is humility is humiliation. That's, that's how it usually happens for me. And yeah, that's a point I'd like to make not only on a personal level but also on a cultural level. But everyone's experienced it like what exactly is humiliation. It's when a false image dissolves the image that you had exhibited to others.  The fear of humiliation is really the fear of being fully seen for what you actually are. And it comes, it's powered to a large extent in this society by conditional, it's this unmet need for unconditional acceptance, unconditional love. It goes back to parenting styles where shame and conditional acceptance is leveraged to control children. This is a huge topic. But then on a cultural level also the story that Western civilization held of itself as being the pinnacle of human development charged with the sacred duty of bringing progress and development civilization to the benighted masses of Africa and Asia and so forth, like this white man's burden, like this whole story.  It's like everyone's going to become like us. We represent the future. Others are not quite as far along toward becoming like us, but we're going to bring them there. That's what progress is. Like this mindset is still with us, but the humiliation is gathering because we can no longer say, look at the paradise that we've achieved. You so want to be like us. That that is falling apart. And it is humiliating. And it is my wish. Like I would even phrase it as a blessing. May we be thoroughly humiliated so that we may become open to solutions to our problems that are from outside of what we thought were the limits of the world, the limits of reality. Because actually all of our problems are easy to solve. But the solutions do not exist in official reality anymore. It's interesting, isn't it? Because humility, I mean, even personal humiliation is very painful. I don't know quite why it's interesting, isn't it? Why it's such a painful experience and people will almost go to absurd lengths. I say people, probably me. You know, we'll go to almost absurd lengths to avoid it and we'll harden up against it. Of course, the other possibility is a culture and we'll harden up against it and the individual will protect itself against it. I think again that can be part of the sort of I'm right, you're wrong, you know, that's happening so much in the world and creating so much polarization. How do we know how we're going to help ourselves and culture sort of face that sort of pain and see that as a positive thing? Yeah, so a lot of the polarization, the I'm right, you're wrong, we're good, they're bad. A lot of that is a result of the breakdown of the story of the people that gives us identity and meaning. When that breaks down, then you can get identity and meaning from your belonging to a political ingroup that identifies itself as the good guys and the others as the bad guys. That is a source of meaning. Conspiracy theories are another source of meaning. Oh, I know what's happening now. So a lot of this, both conspiracy theories and not to say that I don't want to dismiss everything that conspiracy theories say as well as just conspiracy theory because it's used now as a smear against anything that deviates from orthodoxy. Okay, but of course they're not all true either. So anyway, but just saying that that here is a way to gain a sense of identity and belonging. And it is so polarization and conspiracy theories, including rigid orthodoxy are all symptoms of a breakdown of meaning and collective identity. So to undo that. What you were saying is really relevant that like what makes this painful process bearable of humiliation. What and so if this rigid polarization is powered by a need for acceptance and belonging. We can undo it in even our individual interactions with people person to person on the internet whatever by extending unconditional love to these people to everybody to seeing each person not as a member of a category, especially a, you know, negative category. But as a divine soul that creates, and you know to actually see people like that. That makes them feel safe. And it meets the real need that underlies the political identification. And like, you can, you can try this in your next family gathering. How to translate that into political culture that's a much bigger question. You know it's not necessarily going out there and being really nice. But it is being respectful. It's to keep in mind that, no matter who's, you know, Twitter feed, or Facebook page you are commenting on that this is. This person is God in human form. This person is is the same as you are. It is life itself in a particular combination of circumstances.  We are life, you are life incarnate. I really love that. I think that what I feel strongly is that there is nothing higher than person. The person, you, Charles or I or anybody else, that's a miracle of life. I've been reading Marilyn Robinson, a great lover of her novels. She was saying that we've all got the most miraculous thing in the universe, the human mind. What I fear is a reducing of person to category. I'm a gay man, although I never use that language, but I don't want to be reduced to that.  My life is bigger than any category and I want to be related to as a sort of sovereign individual. A bit like what you're saying about a sort of soul. Is that where you're sort of going with that? Full and complete individual. It's kind of mind blowing to actually see somebody and to realise that they are having a complete experience. There's a complete universe in there going on in their mind. I'm, to some extent, maybe a character in their all-encompassing drama. When I go there, then you become much less of just a character in my drama. You're an actual full subject looking out at me, having an experience that's every bit as visceral as my experience of you. Wow. That's simply the truth. In a modern society, we have massive training to deny that truth. Our economic lives are pretty much based on getting the best deal, avoiding getting taken advantage of. When you make a purchase, the training and the pressure, and this can be intense economic pressure, you don't think about which of these products was made with less exploitation of human beings. You might think about that, but you might not even be able to afford to think about that. You're certainly not encouraged to think about that because what you see on the screen is the price. You don't see anything else. This society, as we know it, runs on dehumanisation, putting people into categories of consumer, for example, not to mention racist and sexist categories. Dehumanisation runs the world as we know it. Not just dehumanisation, but the reduction of nature of non-human beings to less than full beings as well. Some people in a deep meditation experience or a psychedelic experience might have this knowing as well that beingness is not only in human beings, but we're in a world that is thick with beings, overflowing with beings, and with being. Therefore, we're not alone here. That's just another thing that struck me about your thought, is that there's this sort of deep vein of sort of animism. I think you want something more than mere appreciation of beauty and mere appreciation of nature. I think you want a sort of resonance, a kind of kinship, a sort of unity, which, again, is very relevant to Buddhism, really. My own teacher, Sanger, actually, he said that you can't really be a Buddhist at all unless you're first of all an animist. In other words, first of all you see the world as alive and conscious in some way that perhaps we can never explain. Or yes, ancient cultures, traditional cultures, many of which still exist on Earth, did not see and do not see human beings as the only conscious intelligences here. It's not to say that human consciousness is the same as the consciousness of a tree or a rock or a deer. It's not. But they are not fundamentally devoid of something that is the sole province of human beings. That has been an almost universal understanding among humanity that has only withered in the last few centuries. Over a couple of thousand years, this is a whole historical process that has to do with domestication and then Christianity and then science, like this progressive stripping of beingness from anything outside the human being. Christianity used to have all kinds of holy places and saints, and the divinity was quite diffuse. Over the centuries it became more and more concentrated. The division between the holy and the profane more and more rigid until holiness came to be only in God, Jesus and the Bible. And then science took it a step further and stripped holiness from everything. And then in typical fashion when the monster has devoured everything and then it turns on itself. And then human beings are stripped of beingness too and consciousness is reduced to neurochemistry and the random movement of, you know, atoms in a void. And that is a wellspring of despair that unconsciously colors anything from activism to the way we live our lives, like this little kernel of despair. Like this little grain of plutonium constantly irradiating the psychic body and generating one cancer after another after another. We need to extract that.


All right, new version here with sound, let's go. Caroline? Eve? Oh, sorry, were you, um, Sit down. I was just, oh. I know. Sit down. Okay. Caroline? So, after seeing your email, here are my thoughts.  I'm slightly, the way she says sit down and her getting out, which I do like the animation a lot here. It just doesn't quite, it doesn't sound like that's what she wants, if that makes sense. So, coming in already, watch out, it feels like we're off balance, even though she leans over there, it's a bit of an odd feel. I would bring that foot over just a bit more. Or you start here, almost like you can start here with maybe the leg more bent this way, potentially. Caroline? This is fine, right? Coming in, she's like, oh, can I go in here? Caroline? Not sure you need this in terms of an acting choice. I'm not sure if this is, hey, you know, is this you? Not that I would point towards her, but this is more like, hey, pay attention or here's a point or, I don't know, there's something that it doesn't quite register with me in terms of Caroline, like she's asking the off-screen person, Caroline, hey, are you Caroline? Caroline? Eve. And I think it would be, I like this, like holding this close together and the prop being close to her, she's nervous. Caroline? So for me to do this, where she brings it down and it's, and she opens up to her, is an off thing where it's like a nervousness, but then an openness. So it could be something where it's like that, where she kind of leans forward and has, like she starts a gesture with this and kind of stops it. What? Because she's still nervous and she wouldn't go up straight too much. Unless, unless you're saying, all right, oh, you know, this might be, Caroline, I need to be, I need to be, it needs to be okay, I can need to look, I need to look confident, but then I would keep this, but then keep that arm down here and maybe this even closer, more to the side, like she still wants to hide a little bit. And then you can see maybe some finger movement here where it's basically, she wants to show, right? If you change this here, let's make, let's make this here. This basically is her pretending that she is okay. I want to stand up straight and show that I'm confident, but then holding the prop here, kind of to the side, still slightly covering and protecting herself and bringing this down where the hand is kind of fidgety, that's the subtext, where I am actually still nervous, but I am pretending to be confident. That's kind of how we'll play this instead of that. Eve. And then watch out, she says, Eve. She says Eve. It's almost coming too soon. Eve. Where she reacts right when she hears the word. Eve. Oh, sorry, where you at? And then the thing is, Eve. This seems like she is disappointed to hear Eve, but we don't know why. Not that that's wrong, that can be revealed later, but it shouldn't this be a, where a position she has, and she says Eve, and it will be kind of like a nervous quick nod. Like, yes, yes, yes, yes, I'm looking for you. So this seems, this seems a bit odd, because she's asking Caroline, she's saying Eve, so she's Eve. She goes, oh yeah, that's me. I am, you know who I am, so it should be good. And that's why she's nodding. Caroline, Eve. So I don't know why she would be disappointed that she knows her, if that makes sense. Oh, sorry, where you at? I don't mind this. Oh, sorry, where you at? So it could be something where she is, oh yeah, yeah, it's me versus going down. So she's still upright.  Like, oh yeah, yeah, it's me. Oh, but. Sorry, where you at? I do like this because she's now leaning over towards the exit where, oh, maybe you were busy. Let me leave. I don't want to disturb you. Where you at? But then this is just a bit broad.  And it's where you, and it's almost like a sub pose where like, where she says like that and she might do something with her arm and have a bit more like a apologetic facial reaction versus this, this is, this is too freaked out. This is to me, you know, if she goes Eve should be, yes, yes, yes, that's me. She's nervous. But now she wants to apologize.  And then where you is, I mean, I think you have it because of the sit down, but yeah, I will keep the where you in that kind of expression. Sit down. But then here's the problem. The sit down to me is it's so, like, yeah, here, come on, sit down. Where Caroline is basically saying, stop standing there. Don't be so awkward. Come and sit down. And it doesn't sound like go away. That the way she says, and that's my main issue with the shot, which I know is very subjective, but. I was just, oh. And even this here. I was just, oh. That is so broad. The end to me from here on is all very over, overanimated to me. I was just, where? I was just, oh. Oh, sorry. Where you, where you? I was just, oh, I was just. Because she just says, I was just, and I think instead of having a movement right when she talks, it would be her maybe blinking a lot because she's listening and processing and she's just getting even more nervous. So it's not movement on when she talks. I was just, oh. And this is, this is just really broad. And then she looks away. It's a bit of an awkward pose where this is towards us and this is away from us. But you have to think in terms of she is now almost freaking out even more that she did something wrong. So imagine she would still be in thisish position instead of a broad move like that. To me, it would be like this.  Like this is so awkward. Like I want to go away from this and not I want to make myself taller and look in this direction. I don't know, unless you would fully exit this way. So to me instead of this one too broad step thing I would have like little steps where you go and that for contrast would be great where you have feet are apart and then you take little step and then she puts her feet together. Like she wants to make herself small and retreat and go back to where she came from. You know, I know. And then especially here, this is so big. This is someone who's like, come on. What's going on here? You know, why am I waiting so long? This is someone that's upset and it's just not someone that's nervous and wanting to leave. No. Then this works better. I would just have it this way. But it works even less after this because it's such a big row. So much energy and it's almost confident. Like come on. And then suddenly going back into I'm shy. So to me it's more like, like I said she takes a couple of steps back and then it would just be the, I know would be somewhere in that realm. Sit down. But then again, it doesn't work for me just to sit down is almost softer now but it really is. It's almost like you're expecting a hand in here that goes softly.  And then I mean, you could have that. She's also looking this way. Watch out for eye line and it stays consistent. It's just looking this way and then she's looking that way. But imagine what if this is the POV and you would end up having a hand because there's so much room. It could just be, she's nervous and she keeps telling her, it's okay. Come in, come in, come in. And then after that hands comes in you could have like a tiny bit of a head shake of, oh no, no, no, no, I'm not coming in. Like, oh no, no, no, no, I'm not coming in. And then she goes and out. It was a duel of this. Like this is great. Timing's great. I love the exit. And that's that. I know these are crazy destructive notes. It's just, me personally, the audio and her acting to that audio doesn't quite work. And I will look at in terms of she came in here and then she exits here. So in her mind, out here, it's her safe zone. So anything that she would do leaning wise would be leaning towards the exit. She's nervous, but she really wants to leave and she's inching back where at the end she goes, oh, I'm out of here. And that's that. Now I know that's a massive departure. So feel free to just ignore whatever you need to. But since we emailed someone to let you know that is, that's kind of how I took the line. And the biggest thing to me is it's just not a sit down of go back and sit where you came from. This is a standing only audition or whatever it is. That's kind of the issue that I have with it. But yeah, it might just be me. I would show it to other people to see kind of like, you know, 10 people who thinks the audio works and then go from there. All right, thanks. All right, there's an email. You can sign up. You can start whenever you want. You can submit whatever you want. You get 16 submissions. Either way, a like and subscribe would be awesome. All right, thank you.


also noteworthy it is September 1st so the rosters expand to 28 the Yankees added two players to the roster Brooks krisky and Estevan Floreal both of those guys were on the taxi squad as you see right there also Alberta Brayu was on the taxi squad however he's not yet eligible to come back he would have been had somebody been injured but that is not the case Louise Heel could play a role in September as a spot starter or even a reliever but Aaron Boone said that's something that will be considered down the line


Hi and welcome to another 5 minutes with Harold Feld where we try to take insanely complicated boring stuff and make it slightly less boring because this stuff is important. Now that the FCC is looking at allowing paid prioritization, aka fast lanes, I want to raise something that's a concern. Something I call virtual redlining. You're probably all familiar with the idea of redlining. It's the idea that companies look at zip codes or they notice that certain kinds of customers live in those zip codes and they don't go there. So Verizon, for example, built out Fios to a whole bunch of zip codes in the Washington DC metro area but did not build out Anacostia and other neighborhoods in DC. That's redlining. They draw a redline around the map and say, those guys don't look to us like good customers. We're not going to go there. It's a typical problem for folks in rural areas because people tend to think, well, they're poor, they're rural, they're not as good customers. And of course, people make all kinds of stereotypical assumptions if you're in minority communities about what you do and you don't like. Now let's add paid prioritization. So we're going to have companies and they're going to be offering these services. Now until now, when you bought an internet connection, it worked the same wherever you were. Yeah, you might have a redlining problem that people weren't building a high-speed connection to you. But if you had a connection that was five megabits down, one megabit up, whatever, and wherever you bought that, it worked pretty much the same. The content worked the same. Now we're talking about prioritization. They have a company like, let's pretend somebody like Barney's decides they're going to offer some kind of high-end online service. They're not going to want to pay to prioritize to every single customer. They're going to go to Comcast, to Verizon, to all of these ISPs and say, hey, rather than buy the millions of customers that are on your system, let me just buy a couple of zip codes. I have a particular targeted service because I know the kind of people who are going to want to buy my service and I know the kind of people who aren't going to want to buy my service. Now those people, for varying definitions of those people, will still be able to access the service through their standard internet connection. They just won't get the high-end prioritized good service because the company that's offering the service doesn't want to pay the extra money. Now it won't be Comcast's fault or Verizon's fault or any ISPs fault. They're just going to offer what these guys want. Now they'll even have very good reasons.  Don't you want local content to be prioritized to local people? All kinds of efficiencies. This will be good for consumers. It'll just be an unfortunate coincidence that the same businesses that make stereotypical decisions about who their best customers are and who they think ought to be buying their service in real space will make the same decisions based on the same bad stereotypes in cyberspace. That would be very unfortunate because until now, at least if you could get a connection, it worked the same for everybody. But starting sometime soon, if the FCC allowed paid prioritization, we're not going to really be able to rely on that stay in the same.


What's up everybody Jason here for Jasper's case breaks calm twenty two twenty three penini flux basketball just sold out This is a six box half case break pickings number two So the second half of the case guys and again if you buy a team you get a chance to win the magic or the thunder We're number one against the magic number two gets the thunder. So again, we're gonna copy and paste the names here that bought in Steven got last about Mojo got the Blazers and Here we go guys So I'm gonna take out those X's There's that roll Six and a three nine times one two three four five six seven eight Nine times six three nine Chris Montalvo and will so that means Chris you're gonna get the Orlando magic and then Well, you're gonna get my thunder There you go. It's awesome now. Let's do the break guys Now also, this is a promo break guys It is the last promo break that we needed to do unlock the break and this counts as five entries So also to I'm going to Add your guys names into that list already as well before I forget And that's one two three Yeah, that's what all right sweet, so there you go guys And then last one Mojo on this list We're just gonna put like a Friggin money sign just to prove that that's the last bar right there All right you guys awesome possum Now, let's do the break For three boxes at a time like you did yesterday Then a big man through and You got a Dyson Daniels to 75 for the pelicans Also to Here's the customer names there as well Everybody bought in straight up. So that's the good thing Jalen sucks tonight and I'm for the magic And Christian Brown to 35 equinox, that's really nice Nuggets a la murder He is a champion Jan the red red I don't think the red is number, but that's one for the pistons I'm a leak busy and then we got a Jordan Clarkson to 75 With the nice shade on sharp Titan So the Portland Trailblazer's gonna Steven last Bob Mojo. All right, there's the first box Next up Gavin Vassil to 49 for the spurs Justin with that one Jdub for the thunder We got a Kyrie Irving for Dallas on T-stival for Portland last Bob Mojo Steven eight out of 25 Broke slope is red and a nice Johnny Davis pop stock signatures That's for wizards Chris All right, third box here now Nevar for the Indiana basers But I'm Mark Edwards Paolo nice John Marant triumph. Is that a gold? It is a gold one out of ten job grizzlies serenity with that one. That's a sweet one Bones Island the camera settings go back.  It's very unfocused There it is. It's way better Goldwood Johnny Davis Paolo Dennis Schroeder Quintan Grimes Wiggins 75 for the Warriors and Walker Kessler for the Utah Jazz all rookie autographs so far guys Now he must have hit all the vets yesterday Utah Jazz with William with that one. We got a red Trey Jones Hi, nice three boxes for the next three number to 75 for the moles going to Chris The shooting sharp Davies called all Pope number to 25 for the Denver Nuggets and Flugs J. Dove Got a little stuff curry red So we got here, you know, it's Valentinas for the pelicans blue and a Dyson Daniels at 35 Equinox for the pelicans Chris with that one. I'll be topping the 99 next that is Will Benedict Nattern is 75 for the pacer. That's a really nice one Pacers it's gonna mark and then a nice green like a little lime green Titan Devon Booker for the Suns will that one five out of five.  There you go prime time out of five Devon Booker Kenneth Loplin Junior Silver you got Orlando Robinson Jada Nivee We got a red herb Jones Jada Nivee in plugs or fluid I should say and a Jalen Durand The Detroit Pistons Pistons That's going to Chris Butler. Every single box so far has been a rookie autograph Crazy, so let me do it pretty much all the veterans In the last case Or the last in the first half Besides that Benedict Nattern five out of the six were all vets little Johnny using for the jazz to 49 Terry's Halliburne, Doug McDermott last one here This is good too though, but he's not gonna get as much playing time now with Chet in the play now But this was Jay Doe. This would have been a monster but Jalen Jay will Remember there's two Jalen's for the thunder nice hit though still will prime time. He's a great player It's just that now that Chet's playing he's not gonna be playing as much no more very nice. Oh see the The the brown we hit you man that do the ball or two He's the big rookie for them this year that little teaser right there. All right, and then obviously we're gonna end it off with that Carthing towns and Terence man, not numbered, but They will them up. They're nice polar parallels. All right, you guys will this I can have a little way better than the first half Jesus, like I said every single autograph was a rookie Some of them were numbered as well by the Christian Brown to 35 out of 10 J. Will and then Dicing down his equinox But yeah, awesome awesome second half guys got a couple golds including the genre and then the out of five Devon Booker So pretty nice guys again. I added you guys to the promo list again at the end of this break I'm gonna randomize the whole promo list and see if you win some money just for buying to this break guys Thank you guys so much ask these case breaks calm


Hey guys, just Nate, AKA the Foot Accountant. Welcome back to the channel. The big day is almost here. Team of the Year is tomorrow and it is leaked. We know who is gonna be in this year's Team of the Year. I wanna take a look at those leaks and how they are already impacting the market along with a huge flashback SBC that we think might be coming this weekend in Team of the Year as well. And of course, there's still a lot of content that's going on right now. Yesterday, we had the Petter Check, Icon SBC, and EA dropped the 83x3 midfielder packs. Now, will we see more packs like this today or is it gonna be a quiet Thursday on the game as well? I wanna talk about that and of course, since yesterday was not a quiet day of content, a lot of stuff, people are going out and doing SBCs, the 83x3s, the 83x10s, fodder is going up and the rest of the market is still crashing, but I think we might be getting very close to the buy time or the buy zone for a lot of these out of pack special cards that so many people want to get for their teams at a cheaper price with the Team of the Year market crash really in full swing. So I wanna take a look at that and of course today, there's a big SBC that might be dropping. Player of the Month, League One, will it be Mbappe? We're gonna talk through that. We have no leaks right now, but still, talk about how that could move the market today even further. So if you're excited, the day before Team of the Year, Team of the Year, Eve, if you will, drop a thumbs up on the video and of course, subscribe. If you are new, let's talk about these leaks and let's talk about Team of the Year. First of all, this is a tweet from last year from EA and there will be a tweet just like this today on the 19th of January. The day before Team of the Year, EA will tweet the full Team of the Year 11 probably in a video just like this. They've done this now the past couple of years and it will basically confirm, most likely, the leaks that we have seen. Now last year and even two years ago in FIFA 21, they just showed the players, they didn't show the stats. So we will probably still be without stats today unless there are additional leaks from guys like FootSheriff showing the stats of the players in Team of the Year. But EA will be posting today, so watch out for that. But it's probably gonna be information that we already know because we have the full Team of the Year leaked 11 and man, there are a couple of surprises in here but I felt like it went according to kind of how we thought it was gonna go. According to plan, the first surprise was the first leak that we had, Jude Bellingham. I feel like a lot of people thought the midfield was gonna be Conte, or sorry, not Conte. Mudrich, Conte and old FIFAs, right? Mudrich, Kevin De Bruyne and then either Casemiro, Jude Bellingham or Fede Valverde. That was like the top three names to get that last third and final midfield spot and Jude Bellingham is gonna be the one getting the card. Hopefully his card looks somewhat like this or is all 90s stats.   Some people say this one's undeserved but again, I just have to remind you guys, it's fan voted, right? Fan voting means probably a lot of these or some of these may not be the most deserved in terms of how they actually performed but if people wanna see him in FIFA, they vote for him and boom, they'll get a card, right? Now of course, this one's definitely deserved. Kevin De Bruyne, probably gonna be one of the higher rated Team of the Years and most likely the highest rated midfielder might be tough with Mudrich being in there as well but KDB is in Team of the Year, of course. I don't think there's anybody with questions about that and then in the defense, it gets pretty interesting. Taylor Hernandez is our left back in the Team of the Year 11, really insane card. Guys, we're gonna have a price predictions video going up later today talking about how much I think these Team of the Year cards will cost as they are dropped into the game so watch out for that as well. We've got Messi right in the attack. Guys, I really, really hope that EA go back to the old ways of making Team of the Year cards 99 rated. I don't believe they're gonna do it but I have a little bit of hope because those were the days when Team of the Years were actually elite but hopefully Messi at least gets a 98 with some really big stat boost and hopefully they give him the high low work rates that they did on his World Cup card. He's in the team, obviously. Virgil van Dijk, our first of two center backs, a part of the defense as well.  He's gonna be very expensive. Again, people will argue, is this deserved or not, fan vote kicks into play but that's a really nice card. Probably gonna be pretty high rated as well. By the way, all of these are stats predicted. These are not final stats. These are just predicted stats for all of these cards. Here's our other center back and I knew, I would say that I knew, I really thought this guy was gonna get in. Eddie Militao gets in. There was no Rudeger in the voting. There was no Alba in the voting. I saw this man in so many votes. I feel like the only other option outside of this was maybe to add another full back in and have Joao Cancelo in this Team of the Year team. Obviously, Joao Cancelo as we will see did not get in but I think this card is going to be insane. I think it's even better than a Marquinhos Team of the Year. I'm super excited for Militao. He's gonna be so overpowered in this game. Gonna be really expensive as well. And then our final defender, Hakimi at right back. Just like last year, probably gonna be one of the mid to cheaper Team of the Years but very, very good for Lynx and obviously one of the best right backs in the game. Probably catapulting him maybe to number one depending on the stats that EA give that card.  Obviously everybody remembers his 99 rated card from a couple years ago. Probably won't be that good but should be absolutely insane. One small note I'd like to add here is I hope EA also adds some more skill mover weak foot boost. Last year we had the Levin Dotsky with the five star weak foot and that added a lot of hype. Just imagine like this Modric with five star skills or maybe it'd be a shot, like a long shot but messy with five star skills or something like that, right? That would be really, really hype. Let's talk more about the last two leaks. Killian Mbappe, no surprise here. Probably gonna be the highest rated alongside of Messi in team of the year. Gonna be seven, eight million coins. 99 pays, 98 dribble. Probably gonna be pretty accurate to what his card is. No surprise there. And Courtois in net is our goalkeeper. So I think that was expected as well. Pretty Madrid heavy, right? Again, if you take a look at this team of the year team, the only one that there was not a picture posted for was Benzema. Benzema is the other attacker so Benz Mbappe messy up front. KDB, Modric, Jude. Militao, Van Dyke, Theo, Hakimian, Courtois. A solid team of the year. Some different names in here, right? First team of the year for Jude for sure. Might be, I think it's the first team of the year for Theo as well. So that's hype. Benzema getting into team of the year is super duper hype. I mean, there's four league or four La Liga players in this team. There are two Premier League. There are, was it three from PSG and three from League One and then one Bundesliga and one from Serie A. So every single of the top five leagues is represented in this team of the year, which is interesting. That's not always the case. Last year it was like all-prem and all-league one. This year there's a lot of La Liga in there, which is cool. Real Madrid, of course, getting the deserved players in team of the year for their performances last year in the calendar year of 2022. So let me know down in the comments what you guys think about this team. I think it's hype. I mean, I'm excited to chase these guys in packs and to see the stats specifically. I'm very, very excited to see these cards. Now, of course, with these guys being put out, some of the other special cards like Militow, probably being one of the lesser expected cards to get into team of the year, as the market was dropping a lot yesterday, some of these cards dropped a little bit extra. Militow dropped a 100,000 coin amount from 600K, all the way up to 500,000 coins.  And there was a lot of that, like Jude Bellingham dropped off a lot, Van Dyke's special cards dropped even more as people, of course, know that they are getting into team of the year. That could continue into today a little bit when EA go and post most likely a video like this, confirming our team of the year as well in the game. So, the one thing I wanna talk about though is moving on from the team that has been leaked, we have to look at the SBC that was leaked. This caused probably more waves to the market than the actual team of the year did. And it is Sergio Ramos is getting a flashback team of the year SBC. I mean, we're just looking at leaks for the beginning part of this video. I'm sorry for a lot of leaks and stuff in here, but like, this is crazy, right? This probably will rival the flashback Varan that we had last year in FIFA 22. This is nuts. GGCEA, I mean, Ramos was a fixture in team of the year for so many years. It is awesome that he's getting a flashback card. I just hope the stats are a little bit better than that because honestly, if you take a look at some of the other centerbacks that we have in this game at this stage, I mean, a lot of people are really hyped about this brand new Kempembe card, right? And Kempembe's centurion's card was one that dropped off in price almost immediately after this Ramos leak was posted. You can see now he's 430,000 coins, 440K. He was almost 500,000 coins and then this Ramos was posted. I really hope that Ramos has a little bit more pace and a little bit more physical than that card that is leaked. And honestly, I would rather have a better card and make it be more expensive because if you guys remember last year, the Rafael Varan SBC that we had, the flashback was kind of expensive, but we were all doing so many special packs and so many upgrade packs during that time and getting fodder, that it was very craftable and kind of easy to do. And that was a flashback SBC that was literally in so many people's teams throughout the whole rest of the year. And FIFA, until team of the season when other great, incredible, statistically juiced centerback cards were put onto this game, that flashback Varan was a mainstay in people's team. So I really hope that Ramos is juiced and I would rather have a Ramos SBC that's like five to 700K with a cracked card than have a card that is just average than it'd be a cheap SBC. That's personally how I would like to have it. But I think that SBC is gonna be dropping on Friday. Some of your PSG links since there's some cards in team of the year, of course, and that's just a very popular way for people to link teams on the market as always. Watch out for some of these, maybe for Roddy, even the, not the team of the year version of Hakimi, but the foot phenoms version, of course, keep a close eye on these cards because there could be a lot of demand for PSG links if that Ramos is very, very well priced. And again, I do believe this SBC will be dropping on Friday with the content drop. Last year we got a flashback Harry Kane on the content drop, so I'd be surprised if it was another order or another way. It just makes sense to start team of the year with a bang with a big SBC like this. So those are all of our big leaks for what could be coming on Friday. Now, of course, there are only three cards on the loading screen, and that to me means that EA is telling us we are gonna have the front three, the attackers, impacts tomorrow on Friday, that's usually how it is. Unless we get more information, we'll probably get a loading screen update today. That's what I would expect to see. So we'll look out for that loading screen update today on Thursday. Now, a couple more things, and this is pretty hype. We have some official team of the year icons we just don't know when they're gonna be dropped. Are they gonna be dropped starting tomorrow? Are they gonna be like next week? Is it gonna be completely random? How many will they do? We don't know, we have a lot of questions about these team of the year icons, but we have two. And the first one, actually both of these, are absolute bangers. Ronaldinho is getting a boosted card. For those of you that wonder, should this be better than his prime card? I think the answer is yes, because primes have been out in the game for a while now, and if they don't go above the rating of the prime or above statistically on the prime, I think people would be a bit disappointed. So, I do think that Ronaldinho will be higher rated and have better stats, and of course, the dynamic image on his card than his prime card, and then Hullet as well. Wow, this could be one of the best Hullet cards we've ever seen in FIFA, especially if they would give him some pace, right? We love the 90 pace. Last year, and a couple years ago, Hullet's moments card has not had 90 pace, and since they're not doing moments icons this year, this is really, really hype. I just hope we get a lot more. I mean, like in the World Cup icons, we had a solid set, three different teams actually, of a lot of different icons that were getting boosted versions. I hope that they put a lot of boosted versions of these World Cup icons in during Team of the Year. So, the only thing I have to say about that is, whenever those icons drop, it actually means a lot for when we open packs, because those cards should be packable like promo cards and have pack odds like we saw with the World Cup icons. So, hopefully we get more information from EA Sports on that, but guys, there's just so much hype to look forward to with cards that are being released. And I know that some of you guys might be like, man, Nate, these are super duper expensive. I'm just here to buy cards for my team in the low point. And well, welcome to the low point. The market is being panic sold like crazy. Of course, as we talked about and we saw yesterday, we kind of expected this, right? And it was a good day to trade yesterday if you found the right cards at the right time, but overall, a lot of the market is just dropping as player prices are going down as people are getting ready for a team of the year. We looked at that Ed Air Millet towel graph and we could take a look at so many graphs right now on this game of prices that just went down yesterday. Some cards have actually gone back up a little bit, but take a look at Tamori, 175K. He started the day yesterday up at 200. I mean, that's not even that big of a drop. From 200 to 175, I mean, yeah, it is a big drop, but some of the other drops in the market yesterday were way bigger than that. Vinny Jr.'s 1.1 Mill right now, that is very low. I'm trying to find a couple of cards that have gone down a ton. Cancelo is down a lot. Aloe Weirin was down a lot yesterday. I mean, almost everywhere you look on this market, card prices are just dropping because everybody is panicking for team of the year. You see this, right? 280 on Kordoba, down to 240 where he is now. Some cards were down 20 to 25%. That was kind of like the max drop-off in just yesterday's prices. Rafael Leal, 800K. He started the day yesterday in the high 800s. He was all the way down to like 785. So the thing I will say about the market right now is a lot of your out-of-pack specials that are the most meta cards that a lot of people maybe want to buy for their teams during this team of your time period, whether it's a Centurion's card, maybe it's like Ben Yetter, maybe it's this Campembe, maybe it's Trent Alexander Arnold, maybe it's a Winter Wild cards item. Any of these cards that maybe you have your eyes on to buy as we are in the team of your market crash, keep a close eye on the card that you are really wanting to buy because I think we are in the low point between now, between yesterday and basically Friday ad content. I think there could be a little bit of more panic selling around Friday ad content, but I think right now guys, we are in the low point of the pre-team of the year market crash. Now there's obviously no telling how the market's gonna be completely affected after the team of the year promo drops, but we do know that a lot of times, a good amount of the market does rebound back and let's be honest, right? Team of the year cards are super expensive and not everybody can afford them or can go out to try to open enough packs to try to pack them, right? And to try to buy them off of the market. And a lot of people just use this as an opportunity to get players for their team and to maybe open a few packs and hope to get lucky, right? 341 for Akimi, that's pretty cheap. That's very tempting to me actually because the links to the PSG Ramos SBC that might be released soon. So I'm kind of watching this card for sure, but also there might be more panic with him getting leaked today in the official EA post. That's besides the point, sidetracked. But a lot of cards, again, like we said, that are just really low right now, if you are watching a card and it's down like 20% plus from the last week when the market started to fall even, like this Gen-Duzi card. Gen-Duzi last year, his winter wild cards was an item that absolutely exploded post team of the year. It was on its way up anyway, but Gen-Duzi was at 140,000 coins. He still is like 140, 150K. If there's any additional panic on a card like this today or tomorrow and Friday, I just feel like it's probably a decent time to get those into your squad if you really just want to buy those for your team and maybe even for some investments. I think there'll be opportunities to buy these cards and to sell them on maybe next week or maybe even later this weekend for a short-term flip. I think there'll be plenty of opportunities to do that here in the next couple of days and just with the way the market's probably gonna react. Again, we think that people are gonna open a lot of packs this weekend even though there's only three team of year cards in packs, I do expect to see a nice little bit of a market bounce. Wow, Vinny Jr. for 1.1 mil. That's pretty low too, man. Like that's tempting me at this moment. I'm almost wanting to buy that card as well. A lot of temptation to buy cards because card prices seem very, very low, but also at the same time, I'm not expecting the market to fly back every single which way tomorrow or even today. Only some parts of the market, the most meta, the most popular will bounce back right away. Some prices may take time to rise, but I really do feel like for some meta cards in this game and a lot of cards that you guys maybe wanna buy for your team, a lot of cards are really low and it's a good time between today and tomorrow. There could be some more panic tomorrow, right? We have the hero pack or the hero player pick that's gonna be refreshed. We have the 83 times 10 that's gonna be refreshed again today, two more times technically and there's a lot of SBC demand and people are draining their coins out of their clubs trying to get this stuff done and trying to get SBCs done. So just watch the market, but I feel like we are in a very, very low point. Now, speaking of fodder, it's the exact opposite. We're at a very high point for a lot of the middle tier fodder market. 83 is 1.5K, 82 is by the way, they're slowly rising, right? More people will be getting rewards today from rivals going and doing those 83 plus SBCs, trying to get a few of those done. So if you bought 82s, I would be listing them for lazy buyers at 1K, you will get sales. I've seen a lot of people selling their 82s at 1,000 coins. You will get sales there, so list those up there. Their prices might even rise to that today honestly as 83s are probably gonna go up a bit more and so will maybe 84s and there'll be one last push for like the 85s, the 86s and the 87s all around like 22K, 22K for the 87s but like 20K for the 85s and 86s. I would say it's not a bad time if you have any last minute fodder to maybe start to sell a little bit of that because even though we have that hero player pick refreshing tomorrow, there's just gonna be a lot of supply and a lot of people are gonna open packs so I'm just a little bit worried about that. So I think to be safe, if you have any fodder left, the safe route would be sell that hopefully today. Even 82s, right? List your 82s up for 1,000 coins, maybe 1,200 coins if you bought some of those. If you have 83s, I mean, I know people that are getting sales on 83s, 1.8 to 2K during the peak of the day. So I would try to sell during the peak of the day today when people are on doing the SBCs, that would be a great time to get that stuff out. And then this weekend for fodder it's gonna be very interesting. We're gonna be watching it closely but I do think there's gonna be a lot of supply as well. So we have to be very careful watching that. Now, I'm making this video too long. I wanna hurry it up. Thursday content today. Player of the Month Mbappe, question mark. There's no leak yet but watch out for a Player of the Month League 1 SBC that will be dropped today. I'm pretty sure it's gonna be dropped today. The voting is up.  It has not been posted yet. Who's gonna be the winner? But there'll be a lot of leaks. There'll be posts on Twitter as soon as that is out. So watch out for that. And then of course, we have got a brand new icon that is dropping today and that icon is leaked. It is Wayne Rooney. So we started off with the biggest W with Kaka. Pettercheck yesterday was a bit of an L. Wayne Rooney, not an insane SBC but it's a cool one, right? It's priced in the markets like 450 to 500K. Hopefully the SBC is around four to 450K coins as well. That will be a card that a lot of people would have fun with to be able to go out and craft. That's a W SBC in my opinion. And then of course, just like we have every single day on Thursdays, we have got most likely the marquee matchups with a couple more packs. Heads up the Winter League SBCs which I have to do this a couple more times. I'm probably gonna end up running out of time to be completely honest. But the League SBCs will be expiring today. Hopefully they get refreshed soon but I don't know if it's going to be instantly when they do that. So last thing I wanna talk about in this video, we're going back to Twitter for this really quick is EA. I'm sure a lot of you guys maybe saw this yesterday. There was an issue with the Centurions cards. Centurions, LATAN and Veradi and Royce all took major hits in price as people were panic telling them yesterday because their stats in game were completely different. Now, let me tell you, if you did not know this, the market like crashed with these prices that happened yesterday like Iber was 2.3 mil because the stats in game were showing incorrectly. It is fixed. There was a visual glitch only and EA have fixed it. So if any of you were still thinking that there was still an issue with those, that is not the case. They are fixed and the stats that they had on their card originally all week are back to normal and they are back correct. So check your Centurions cards if you have them but that was kind of a weird situation where yeah, that sucks if you had a LATAN or a Royce or a Fred because you lost a lot of coins yesterday and really you kind of have EA to blame for dropping like disaster class of literally just reducing the stats on the card like in game. They did a live tuning update on the game yesterday. That must be what have caused it but kind of a crazy situation with that going on there. So that's gonna be the video for today guys. It's a very hype Thursday. One more day till team of the year. If you're excited for team of the year which I know you are hit the thumbs up, comment down below if you have any questions and of course, subscribe if you are new around here. I'll catch you guys in the stream today. Watch out for a double upload. It's been Nathan from Account and catch you guys later. Peace out.