Okay, so I'm still in my apartment. This is a little bit harder for me to share, but but I'm going to give it my best I've I've done a prototype of what the day two activities of road map creation will involve which which is where we get people engaged in collaborating together on joining their respective open education initiatives together So what might you be able to do together that you can't do on your own? That's sort of the focus of day two and those collaborations can happen within a region or within a country or across regions or across kind of sectors if you will it's going to be a bit of Affinity grouping based on your interests of day two. So let me see if I can share with you how this It's a bit tricky for me to do this and manage the camera at the same time But okay, here we go So on the left we start with what it is, you know Who are the regions that are going to work together and again? It's similar to day one in that we start with what is it that we have to start with what is it? We can use is the basis for a collaboration What assets do we have so the color coding is similar to day one green for open assets? Who are the people in community involved? That's yellow blue is what are the operations and sustainability? components that we have that could potentially be shared and combined and Pinkish red is what are the benefits and value propositions that are potentially being combined into a collaborative activity? And all of those could be based on specific initiatives in orange that are already underway that are being used as the basis for a Collaboration and then by collaboration you might be wondering well So what does a collaboration look like and so I've tried to map out a number of different kinds of collaborations And so let me kind of Do this so the top one Starting with this is like here is an open education resource or initiative and the nature of the collaboration is what I'm calling Distribution so in distribution that resource gets adopted and distributed and shared and reused by others all over the world Or all over there all over our particular collaborative region ideally there'd be some You know if there are improvements to the resource by these Other users they would get contributed back and shared for the benefit of everybody. That's part of the whole model of open education The second one here is a little bit different We're starting with two different initiatives or resources and we're engaging in a collaboration that combines them together So you might have a course in biology and a course in physics You're going to combine them together into a shared use case where where perhaps they're coming from different initiatives And now you've created a collective benefit by combining them The third one again starts with a resource, but this one looks at Actually scaling it. So how could you take a starting resource and then Amplify and scale it and make it as big as possible everywhere around the world. So that's a collaboration involving scaling The fourth example here is one that has a starting point of a resource But then recognizes that it might need to be translated or localized for it to be Optimal for use in a particular setting or geography. And so This collaboration would be one that focuses on the translation and localization Of initiatives and resources around different regions or parts of the world And then the last the fifth example I have and these are just five There's other ways of thinking about collaboration, but I wanted you to imagine Different possibilities This one starts with three different initiatives or resources and then Engages in a collaboration that focuses on integration How might those three initiatives be brought together in a way that is synergistic and complimentary So those are examples of different kinds of collaborations that we hope to engage you all in considering and doing on day two Using your road maps as a starting point. I hope you have fun with it It's a lot of fun and we will really be looking to document what the road maps say and And potentially use these as the starting point for real collaborations going forward


Very good morning. It's Friday 21st of May and welcome to episode 17 of the Market Watch. And as ever, I'm joined by Pierce Curran, our head of trading, who I saw for the first time trying to think. Is it in 2021? It can't be, surely. Yeah, it is, isn't it? Yeah, we met on, well, Wednesday morning and you still exist in the flesh. Yeah, it's the first time this year. Yep, we had a nice romantic walk down Little Venice into Paddington. Very romantic. But yeah, we weren't just like going on jollies, going and for a walk in the sunshine. We had quite an interesting meeting. But yeah, anything else going on this week, Pierce, outside of markets and Amplify. It's been going on in the world of Mr. Curran recently. It's going on in my life.  And nothing too major. My kids are, my daughter's got exams coming up next week. So I've actually been helping her with her maths. So I'm doing some quadratic equations. And so yeah, it's, it's amazing what they're learning these days at 14 years old. I don't remember doing stuff that complicated when I was that young, but I don't know. It's a long time ago. Maybe I did. Okay, okay. Yeah, as I told you, I've been, I've been cracking through my Wayne Gretzky masterclasses. And I didn't realise, I always thought it was my idol, Michael Jordan, coined the phrase, you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. And in fact, it's Mr. Gretzky. Who revolutionised his career at midpoint, because he was too unselfish a player to become more selfish to score more goals and then hit the magic. So what is the, what is their sort of conversion rate then? I mean, goals to actual shots? You're asking me an ice hockey trivia question. All right, well, what about Jordan? He, well, I would say percentage wise that knowing the stat, he would probably have already made 25%. Low, yeah, yeah. His, yeah, his, his, his field goal percentages were not amazing, because guys like him shoot the ball a lot. Yeah, basically just pass the term and he shoots. Yeah. Okay. But yeah, so yeah, I mean, if you fancy that one masterclass, I can give it my backing. Wayne Gretzky. What's his angle then? Obviously he's not teaching, well, maybe he is, literally teaching you how to play ice hockey, or is it more about? No, no, it's about psychology. Okay. And the reason why that is good, and I think any market person can testify to is that I don't think you can ever learn enough about mastering your mindset and your, your confidence and things like that. And obviously, as we've discussed, I think in previous episodes, the transition or translation, if you like of yeah, skill sets out of sports into trading. Absolutely. And yeah, there's a lot of some of these kind of iconic sporting figures. We've done a lot around there. Michael Johnson is another one. US athlete, he's done a lot around sports psychology and how he dealt with the, you know, the pressures of like an Olympic final and a mindset of being present and in the moment. And it's yeah, hugely. Yeah, I read, I read his book and he had a really good one where he was the upcoming like main athlete, obviously the 200 400 going into the Barcelona Olympics. Right. In 92. And he was, he was in, he went to Barcelona and then he had some tapas got food poisoning and didn't win. And he was like, it was like a shoe in and he didn't actually get the gold. And then that was when he did like the big double in Atlanta, if you remember, and he had the gold shoes. Yeah, yeah. And it was his home Olympics and the pressure was even great. Yeah. So the tapas did it. Well, that's, well, you know about Usain Bolt, right? And his pre-race prep. I think, I think, yeah, I know he's favourable to a few nuggets just to get things going. Nuggets just to, as part of his warm-up. Any, was that your trading routine? A couple of chicken nuggets from Liverpool Street before you kick off? I don't think, I know it was Marmite on Toast from, oh, what was the name? Very iconic sort of city cafe. God, I can't remember the name. Fuzzy Grubs. Not Fuzzy Grubs. Yeah, something like that. It's been knocked down years ago. Bloomberg, the Bloomberg building is now there. But yeah, Marmite on Toast, granary, granary bread. Okay. I thought you weren't superstitious, you said previously. I'm not. I just like Marmite on Toast. All right. Well, now you've had your Marmite on Toast this morning, I'm sure. One thing I wanted to do with the conversation today was steer it a little bit more in a direction of a cryptos being the big talking point, of course, because we had that midweek shake out, if you like, and we saw a massive move across the crypto space. And we saw a number of different things. There's lots of different factors, but namely, it's kind of been building up a little bit. Obviously, we've been quite elevating price, it's been drifting trending low and say Bitcoin. Musk has done his U-turn on payments. You've had the PBOC in China talking about the fact that, look, digital tokens aren't going to be recognized here. And it felt like these are just triggers. They're almost like the match that lit the fire and then the market fell out midweek. We have reversed, I must say that, and the prices are pretty much even not to draw, basically scratch from looking at Bitcoin specifically rather than any of the others right now. But one of the things here that I wanted to talk about is more from a trading angle. I know neither you or I are qualified enough to really understand crypto and DeFi and these subject matters to many others out there, but we are qualified to talk about the mechanism behind the mechanics of the move on Wednesday. And one of the things or a stat that I saw this morning was now that the kind of dust has settled, data shows liquidations have totaled roughly around $10 billion since Wednesday. So I just wanted to be of an explanation of like why liquidation, it's linked to leverage and the impact on price movement as a subsequent factor. Yeah, I mean, so really the price of anything, I mean, if you think about, forget what it is as in terms of an asset and it's like fundamental value, just forget that for a second. The mechanics of price is really just determined by buyers and sellers in the marketplace. And it's just a function of buyers versus sellers, and that kind of perennial battle. And the way these order books work is that you're going to have buyers coming in to buy and you'll have sellers that are selling and these get matched. The buyers get matched with the sellers and fine, they trade at a specific price. And if there's more buyers than sellers at any point, well then naturally the price of this asset gets driven higher. And if there's more sellers than buyers, then it gets driven lower. But every now and then you'll get a monster mismatch between the volume on the sell side of the book versus the volume on the buy side of the book. And when you get this huge mismatch, then you get big market dislocations. And this is where you get a liquidity crisis, basically, when you've got so many people that are wanting to sell or so much volume that wants to sell, there isn't enough volume on the buy side of the book to be matched with that. And so the price collapses and then this obviously then just snowballs and triggers even more selling because lots of people are, as you mentioned, they're leveraged up and they've got certain stop limits that literally they can't go below and they're forced out of positions. And so as the price starts to drop more rapidly, it just then triggers these stops that then just only makes matters worse as the volume on the sell side of the book grows and grows and grows and the mismatch between the sell side and the buy side volume increases and then the acceleration to the downside goes through the roof and you get a collapse. And in that increase volatility, I guess just by the nature of some of these platforms aren't quite as matured as say traditional asset and products that Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, they all in these episodes, they all typically freeze as well, which is exactly the case on Wednesday. And that just breeds panic because if you own this asset and the price is collapsing, you're like, oh my God, and you get caught up in the panic of it and you're like, I want to sell, I want to sell and then you can't sell. And then you're locked out and all you can see is price dropping. And then this is, so there is, yeah, this is broker risk, it's market access risk and in these immature markets and these immature exchanges. You know, it's a bigger problem. It's not like trading on the New York stock exchange where obviously this exchange is geared up for this kind of stuff. But even like, I remember actually now thinking about it, even the NASDAQ had a problem when Facebook IPO'd back in 2014, the NASDAQ went offline for like, or Facebook trading in the NASDAQ went offline for like 30 minutes because it crashed the system. So I mean, it does, it does happen in some of these big main central stock exchanges but hardly, hardly ever. But in immature exchanges, you know, it's going to, it happens all the time. And I think traders that are new to, well, trading, perhaps don't quite appreciate that's the risk, you know, the kind of mechanics behind actually, how do I execute my position? And is there a problem there? Am I going to be able to trade when I want to trade or not? And in the case of not, that's then breeds panic and just makes the sell off all the larger. I was looking at some stats in terms of that sell side volume and the Binance, basically that's apparently, that's where the kind of sell off kind of got triggered on Monday and apparently there was 53,000 bitcoins dumped into the exchange to be sold. And to get, and so that's where that sudden big sell side volume, you know, dominates and overrides the any buy side volume and you get that downside. But that's some, so 53,000 bitcoins. I was looking it up because I'm not quite sure where we're up to now in terms of how many bitcoins there are out there in existence. And there's currently 18.7 million bitcoins. So 53,000 in one go. So that's 0.3% of the entire global supply of Bitcoin, 0.3% got dumped on the market to be sold. I thought, well, hang on, is that a lot?  So I kind of translated it into Apple shares. What, how many shares, if you sold 0.3% of Apple shares and issuance, that would be 50 million Apple shares. So that 53,000 Bitcoin trade is in some ways equivalent to just dumping 50 million Apple shares in one go. Wowzers. Well, I'd love to be covering the mic when when you see someone come in and dump 50 million Apple shares. But yeah, wow.  Yeah, I can't remember the details on that. January 15th, his birthday, I can't remember the year now. When was it when it's going back 2015? Was it January 15th, 2015? Yeah, I think it was 2015. And yeah, that was, that was a bit different. So he was in, he was short futures and the market went limit down. So what happens in some markets is you have these limit down or limit up mechanisms where the market closes for trading for 10 minutes. It depends on the market and the exchange actually, but I think in this case it was 10 minutes. And then that just allows traders to kind of calm down regroup. And then there's an opening auction where bids and offers get put back onto the order book ahead of them, the market reopening for trading. So you get this kind of blackout period, which is designed to try and halt these capitulation and collapses. It's just breakers, if you like, in the system. And so we have will was short, but couldn't trade. I mean, the market was collapsing. So this was a really, if you're going to be the one, you know, he was the right way round. So he was fine, but the spot market was still trading. And we could see that the spot market was still heavily pushing lower and lower and lower. So whilst he was locked out of the market and couldn't trade actually based off the spot movement, his position was just getting more profitable and more profitable and more profitable. So it was fine, right? The worst case scenario is when you're the wrong way around, you know, you're you're long in a falling market and you can't get out. So in your trading years, I mean, from a psychological perspective, just kind of really narrowing in on that, because I'm sure it's an episode that everyone will account to at some point, whether it's a mechanical failure on exchange or even on your computer. Yeah, right. At some point, something's going to go wrong out of your pre planned control, let's say, or that you could have planned for. So any experiences of that? And how did that? How did you react to that when that did happen? Yeah, I think that well, when I was trading for a US company, there were, you know, contingency plans where there were offsite servers. In fact, they would call the guys in the US, the US office, and they would be able to access and trade on our accounts from the US office. So that was that was covered, right? In the case that our internet connection dropped or whatever, we had a power failure in the building, then that was always the contingency plan. I remember it happened a couple of times. It's fine, you just get the risk.  So there's just the risk team are then on on the phone emergency calls and they would just pick it right. Which trade is in the largest position? Let's start there. Okay, get get them out of that trade and then you just work down the list. And if you're really junior, you know, it might be a few hours and then all right, they take your position off because it doesn't matter for the company. Of course, it matters for you.  And so but you know, there's nothing you can do in those situations. I'd say it's dangerous. Like people trading on their own, their own account trading from home, let's say. And if you're trading large sums of money, you definitely need a contingency plan in place. Because, you know, internet can drop whatever right. And so, you know, it's having a third party you trust, who's not in your building or not in your house, who if you're having an internet failure, hopefully they're not and having some kind of system for for dealing with trades needs be. Okay, well, let's let's progress the conversation on on the crypto front. And one of the things is I know that crypto is undoubtedly becoming more and more popular. I spoke to none other than our previous teammate Sam North earlier this week. And he he works for one of these big platforms now. And in terms of trade activity, he said it's like, basically 100% crypto now. It's not even like if there's a scrap of forex, it's like one to 2% of activity. But he does work with a platform that generally is is more geared to I'd say younger demographics that kind of make sense in that regard. But as it gets more popular, are you feeling any way moved yet getting drawn into the crypto conversation in the more general terms? Or are you still fairly standoffish at this point in terms of just generally a look, I know you're a busy band with other stuff going on beyond just looking at markets and trading. But as it has started to entice you in at all, or I think I'm definitely happy to be involved in the conversation. I'm not, I'm definitely not a crypto expert. Very, very much the opposite. But I think one day we'll have a podcast on this, maybe we'll just go at it because I I'm on one side of the argument, let's say, and it's not the side that those crypto fans like let's just leave that there for now. But I'm keen to get involved with the argument. I've never traded a cryptocurrency ever. Now, do I regret that? For sure. I mean, I was around trading 12 years ago when Bitcoin was invented, right? And fine, I probably didn't hear about it. I can't remember now. It's probably a couple of years until I started to get wind of it. And I was like, what's this thing? Forget that. You know, obviously, if I could go back in time, I wish I'd bought cryptocurrencies. You know, I would have never have bought them because I think their currencies, let's just make that clear. And I definitely don't think their currencies today. And we'll argue about that one on one on a podcast in the future. But in just as a straight out trade, don't get me wrong, these things have gone gone through the stratosphere, right? And people have made a lot of money. But it's the volatility levels of this thing that is absolutely brutal and super dangerous if you don't know how to deal with volatility. And I think a lot of the younger demographic that are coming into trading are naturally leaning towards markets that are super volatile because it's exciting. And that's where the FOMO is, because their mates have made X numbers of thousands and have bought themselves a Tesla.  Great, where do I buy? And so it's really dangerous when it comes to, you know, yeah, inexperienced people trading super volatile assets. But look, even though like obviously Bitcoin's collapsed, it's collapsed the right word. It's corrected. I mean, collapse, it's probably a bit early to call it a collapse or a capitulation. It's a correction at this point. But look, I mean, the point, what sums it up, right, even though it's corrected, as long as you bought Bitcoin prior to the 21st of February, 2021, as long as you bought before then, you're actually still sitting on a nice profit. And obviously the the early you bought, the bigger the profits. And let's get this into context. Most people here aren't sitting on losses. Most people are just sitting on less games. Now, if you have been involved though in the last couple of months, then fine, you're now you're hurting and you're perhaps sat on something that's looking like a really large loss. And then you're you're the people that are at risk because prospect theory, you know, you're right in that point now where you've lost control, lost control of yourself, lost control of your trade, and you're just sat back and just hoping it kind of rebounds. But actually looking at the kind of stat Bitcoin has had plenty of, as I said, it's a super volatile asset and always has been. And this is just one more episode, one more volatility episode along the along the journey. And it's definitely not going to be the last one. So so far, I mean, that were for the 14th of April was the high. So we're kind of 20 odd days into this correction, let's call it, which actually for Bitcoin is quite a long period. And we'll talk about, you know, is this, is this the end? Perhaps our listeners really want to hear what we think about, or maybe they don't, but do we think this is the end of the sell off? Is this the bottom? And as she now carnage is done, and things will start moving back up, or actually quite the opposite, is it this is just the beginning of what was going to be an even bigger wave to the downside. And unfortunately, for our listeners, my answer to that is I've got absolutely no idea. But I can know, I can tell you, I can tell you what might trigger one or the other scenario. And I'll mention that in a minute. But in terms of right now, we're 20 odd days into this correction. And actually, there's hardly been those only I'm just looking back now, there's been four or five corrections in its history that's lasted longer than this, only four or five. And I don't know how many corrections there have been. But maybe you can tell me that. Yeah, I mean, there's a stat I saw was over the course of the last 11 years, they're going right back to the beginning. Yeah. If you were talking about instances of a daily change of 5% plus, there's 750. Okay. If you talk about instances, yeah, okay. So, so, so, so let me give you a bit of context for people who don't follow markets closely. I think it was 2018. I think the S&P 500 daily range was 0.18%. 0.18 average daily range. That was the dullest year. It was just a period of we're just going up basically. That horrible thing, things just appreciating. But yeah. So, so if we go back to the stat on Bitcoin then, the number of times over that decade period that it's gone more than 20% in a single day, of which you could probably count on your hand if you're talking about your stock. Oh, yeah, single. I'm talking in daily moves, daily changes. So how many do you reckon in, in 10 years that it's done more than a 20% percentage change in one day? In that one day. Can't be that. I'm going to say 25. It's nearly 50. Right. So to your argument, yeah. I mean, I mean, how many days were there when the stock market and financial crisis was down 20%? I mean, from what I recall, never. I mean, stocks were down. Single stocks were down 20%. Yeah, but the mechanism that exactly the mechanism that you mentioned, the limit down circuit breakers, your exchange is done if it ever got near 20% and long before that threshold. This sell-off that we had like April, mid-April down through the low that we had earlier in the week. And these numbers I'm about to throw out, these are based on the futures price of Bitcoins. It might not precisely marry together with the actual underlying Bitcoin, but it'll be roughly similar. So we've had a 54% sell-off. Okay. And now it's banked and I'm kind of stabilizing. So it's been 20 odd days so far. So we've and these sell-offs go in bursts. So we had basically five days that you have a wave of selling and then it consolidates. And then you have a wave of selling and then it consolidates. And those waves of selling don't last long, but they're huge in terms of the distance that price covers. So it kind of goes in fits and bursts. So we had five days of selling off sort of second half of April, then it consolidated for 13 days. Then we had six days of heavy selling and that's consolidating again. And this is what happened actually back in, if you look back at the previous big sell-offs in Bitcoin. So in 2017-18, there was a massive sell-off. And in the end, if you look from end of 2017 through to the end of 2018, actually sold off 84% in total. But that first wave, it sold off from 20,000 down to 6,000. That kind of went in five days collapsing, 13 days consolidation. We then had a two-day massive collapse, then eight days consolidation. It then had a six-day big sell-off and then consolidation. So right now, we've kind of had two waves down, I would say in my opinion at the moment, second half of April and then end of last week, start of this week. So we're now in another phase of consolidation. And do we now wave lower? We've dropped 54%. And in the grand scheme of things, we've had big episodes like in 2013, it sold off 87%. Actually, twice in 2013, it sold off over 80%. So I guess my point there is, it's dropped 54%. So can it drop further? Yeah, can. How's it done before? In fact, it started 2020. In Q1 of 2020, it dropped 60%. People don't remember that, do they? That was only 12 months ago. But it can definitely, my point is it can definitely, don't think it can't go any lower because we've had such a big sell-off already. It definitely can. That doesn't mean it will.  And that's because in my humble opinion, there's not much fundamentals that drive this asset and its value. So it's more about technicals and it's more about behavior. And so I think there's two big technical levels. So one's the floor that we hit on Wednesday at 30,000. And the reason why that's technically important is because, well, not only is it the sort of a big round number, but it's also that low point that we had in January this year. So 30,000 is the January 21 low. Then so that's the downside floor. And then the upside resistance is around 42,000. And that was the January high. And it's also the March low from 2021. So you got your two technical levels here. We're in the middle of those two now. So where does this price go next? It depends which of those lines gets broken. If 30,000 gets broken on the downside, we are going further down, we're going to get another big wave, big wave lower, like the waves we've already seen. But if 42,000 gets broken on the upside, well, actually, this could well be the end of this correction and we'll kind of get back to stabilizing. So it's very technical. And right now we're trading in the middle of these two levels. So 30,000 on the downside, roughly 42,000 on the upside. So where does this thing go next? Whichever of those lines gets broken first, I think will then drive direction for the next few months. Okay. And on that, let's wrap it up there for this episode. And just as a reminder, to anyone listening, do check out the Amplify Trading YouTube channel. And the reason for that is because we shot an interview just over a week ago with someone who is in a very famous trading book by Jack Schweger called The New Market Wizards. Her name's Linda Raschke. She's like a trading legend in the States over 40 years experience. And she's such a fascinating woman. She's done like competitive bodybuilding and she's ran a hedge fund. She's one of these people you read about and just go, what? When they start talking about their life experience. That's a really fascinating conversation. And she's asked us to put that out to everyone. And I will do so later today. So you'll be able to access that from the Amplify Trading YouTube channel. Otherwise, please have a great weekend and say to everyone listening.