Hey guys, what's up? My name is Snollie and today I'm going to be sharing my hair care routine with you guys. I've literally been getting so many requests to film this video and it's funny because I actually filmed it like last summer but I never posted it just because I don't really do anything special for my hair. I'm going to be honest, I really just think it's like my Indian hair jeans but I didn't want to make a video and just share with you guys what products I do use. So let's get started with this video. So first I wanted to start out this video by telling you guys my favorite shampoo and conditioner duo and it is the Redken Allsoft. So I have been using the shampoo for so so long honestly ever since high school because that's when my mom used to buy it from me and my sister so she was just like always restock our shower with it and you guys know how it is when you get to college you don't really know what to get so you just buy whatever your mom buys. So literally ever since high school I've been using these two. So pretty much ever since high school I've been using this. The shampoo and conditioner might be like $20 a bottle and to a college student obviously that's not very cheap so sometimes I would just buy products that I see at Target that are like $5 and under just because I'd be running out of shampoo and want to spend that money like elsewhere but I feel like every time I try out something different on my hair like shampoo and conditioner I always end up coming back to Redken Allsoft just because I know it works for my hair. The packaging says it's softness for dry and brittle hair and I honestly wouldn't say that I have dried brittle hair but I use it and it works for me. So if you guys are interested in trying these out or any of these products that I talk about then I will link them in the description below. So I don't really wash my hair that often if I really don't have to I only find it really necessary if my scalp gets super itchy or it looks really greasy and something that dry shampoo can't fix. So I'd say I wash my hair about two times per week maybe even three if I'm like on the grind working out but I actually just found out about root washing and it honestly might have changed my life especially when I get into those grinds of working out.  I tried this one day because I went to the gym in the morning and then I was just going to go straight to film videos after and I didn't want to spend like an hour on my hair especially drying it and styling it. So I tried root washing and basically just the top of my head was wet and then I could just blow dry it for like maybe a minute or two and then it would be beautiful and dry and feel just as you wash your whole head pretty much. I probably recommend doing this only like once a week not like every single time because that would just I don't know that'd be kind of gross but if you guys have that problem of just like dreading styling your hair definitely try that hack out. So when I wash my whole head I do let my hair air dry instead of using a blow dryer. I only use a blow dryer if I really need it if I'm in like a time crunch and I have to go somewhere and it'd just be weird to have my hair looking wet and honestly that's really rare because I never really have places to go especially in the summer when I don't really see people I usually just like tie my hair in a low bun after a shower just because I hate like having wet hair in my face but then it's like wet for like a good 12 hours after that so I really need to just like let it down and just air dry on its own but speaking of tying my hair up I do sleep in a ponytail. I know this is kind of like controversial because I've heard that ponytails rip out your hair and like make it more brittle but I don't know I feel like I can never go to sleep with my hair not on a ponytail especially because if I'm sleeping with my boyfriend he like rolls over my hair and then I can like never move and it's obviously not very comfortable like that so it's kind of a necessity for me to tie my hair um I'm not sure if it gives me any benefits or disadvantages but that's something I do with my hair. So I actually have some more products that I wanted to share with you guys first off I wanted to talk about the spiral hair ties I don't know if you guys have seen this but it's kind of like the new trend basically it's just like one of those like bungee looking like hair tie bracelet kind of things for me this is the only hair tie that actually keeps my buns in place so I really like these hair ties. I don't mind on Amazon I will say that they might be a little bit overpriced sometimes so definitely look for dupes like especially at 4 over 21 and places like that will probably have like the same quality for a lot cheaper. Next I wanted to share with you guys my styling tools. So my first one is my Bombay hair 5 in 1 curling wand. I used to have a newbie one but it broke so I thought I would just try out Bombay hair honestly they're really similar I can't really tell the difference but I've been using some sort of a curling wand ever since middle school. I've always been really afraid of the curling wands with like the clamps on them so I just try to stay away from those I honestly don't even get how people curl their hair with them but it always looks beautiful so I really should learn it one day. And my straightener is the best straightener on this earth like I swear if you guys get the straightener you will fall in love with it. It is the Baeblis pro titanium straightener I think that's what it's called but it's definitely by Baeblis. They have like a whole bunch of different varieties of straightener like the skinnier ones and like the chunkier ones. I think I have like a pretty normal flat one. It definitely doesn't have like the curved edges which I don't really mind because I don't like curl my hair with my straightener since I do have my wand but honestly any straightener by Baeblis will probably like top any other straightener you've ever used. And straightener is sold at Ulta and the great thing about this is that whenever you get your 20% off discount code in your email you can use it for the purchase of your straightener so you can get a little bit money off of that. So normally I don't use that much product on my hair but I did want to show you guys some of the things that I use to make me feel a little bit more fancy. The first one being the best dry shampoo in the world is the Batiste Dry Shampoo in the dark and deep brown color. I love that they have like the different colors because at first I didn't know they had this and I got just like the white dry shampoo and it was just so hard to like rub out of my head and I would definitely have to use like a lot more effort. I will say this is not a dark black color so it's definitely more of an ashy brown and you can still see it if you don't rub it out but it's easier to rub out just because it's not white. I recommend this to a lot of people and every time they get it they say that it's the best dry shampoo by far. The last two products are from the same company and same line. It is the Lanza Keratin line. So this one is the Brush Through Hair Spray and I honestly don't really use hairspray that often. Honestly maybe once a month if it's like a super special occasion and I need my hair to stay put. Usually I like the look of like fallen curls but if I need my curls to stay I will always use this hairspray and then when my hair is a little bit frizzy like after blow drying it or just being in the Orlando humidity I will use the Lanza Keratin Healing Oil Hair Treatment. So basically this is just like Moroccan oil or argan oil so you will just put a little bit on your hair mainly at the ends like I would recommend just not touching your roots at all because it's really easy to make it look greasy if you do put too much.  So that's it on my hair care routine. If you guys are interested in any of these products I will have all the links in the description box below. I'll see y'all at my next video. Bye guys!


It is time to talk week number seven and get you set for the NFL DFS main slate by doing a snake draft here over on FanDuel.com and taking your questions live on Air Afterwords. This is the Snake Draft Q&A right here on the FanDuel YouTube, Twitch, Facebook and Twitter channels. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for NumberFire.com joined here as always by Brandon Gadoula and JJ Zacharyson. JJ is the editor-in-chief of NumberFire and FanDuel JJ. We are on to week number seven. We got a lot of women parts for this slate. How are you doing today? I'm good. I'm good. I feel like this slate's kind of interesting. You know, there's a lot of directions that you can go in with one very, very obvious game that people can target and stack if they want to, which they probably should even though it's chalky. But yeah, I'm good. I'm excited for the weekend. Sometimes chalk is chalk for a reason, man. You know, that's my philosophy. Sometimes chalk can be good. Let's talk to Brandon Gadoula. He is the managing editor of NumberFire.com. Brandon, didn't have any crazy weird injury news come out this week after we recorded our podcast on Thursday. So I'm feeling pretty good. How are you doing today? Yeah, unfortunately, though, that one, I don't want to say that because then it means I was hoping for some injury news, but that leaves us in a... Rest up. Yeah, yeah. That leaves us with a pretty difficult slate with the one game that we already alluded to here, which is the Chiefs and Titans to make it clear. Oh, I was talking about the giant... Patriots' Gems. Yeah, I was gonna say Giants' Panthers. Are we not on the same page? Hey, I just wanted to clarify. I thought it couldn't hurt. Are you not stacking Zach Wilson with Elijah Moore and running it back with Kendrick Bourne? I am not, actually. Oh, wow. Good variant. Good variant, all right. What I was gonna say is that we have the one game and then a lot of the other games kind of have some question marks and there's not like a clear number two game to go at, but I think that that makes it a very intriguing slate from a differentiation standpoint, which is always something that I do a lot because I like to make dumb plays and try to justify them, so. Imagine making good plays when you can instead make bad plays. Sounds a lot better to me personally. We're gonna break down your questions getting you to set for week number seven. So as you're watching here, feel free to put those questions in the chat, whether you're watching on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter or Twitch will take questions no matter where you are watching. We'll take those questions and get to those after we do these snake draft later on here for today. Also a quick reminder to make sure you are subscribed wherever you are watching because we are live now once again every weekday. You're on the Fando YouTube, Twitch, Facebook and Twitter pages. We have our Monday and Thursday football previews. We have a Wave of Wire Q&A on Tuesday. Tom Beckio has NBA DFS on Wednesdays now for each Wednesday going forward. So we're live every weekday at 4 p.m. Just hit subscribe. Also like the YouTube, like on YouTube, like everywhere else. We appreciate it. Those of you who have done so already, let's get this snake draft cookin. JJ, do you wanna put that entry in and get us started? Let's do it. And Jimbo gets the 101. Alrighty, tough choice. Do I go with Derek Henry or do I go with Derek Henry? I don't know, it's a tough call there, deciding between if I wanna go with the big dog or wanna go with little puppies elsewhere. No, just gotta be Derek Henry. It felt like a lock for Jim to get the 101. I mean, we are tied up now. Yeah, I was gonna say, although it's JJ's turn to win because we've had perfect sequence here. So does that mean Derek Henry is gonna underperform? Does that mean that I pivot from Henry to disrupt the universe? Like do I try to throw the puzzle pieces off here? I don't love the 102, I'll be honest with you. Yeah, I like 103 more than 102. I like 101 more than both of those. So I will definitely take it. Derek Henry facing the chiefs here in that one shootout. Henry, just a standout play above everyone else. I know it's not like a shocking declaration. He has $11,000 on FanDuel for this week and he is well worth that. So as this draft gets underway, I will take Derek Henry at the 1.01 and the intrigue begins after that on to JJ with the second pick. What are we thinking here? I think I'm gonna stick with that game. I think that it's, I think the optimal move in a three man here is to go a tie-rekill with the 102. So I'm gonna go a tie-rekill. I think that's the right play. I think that the drop off after Henry at running back is massive and I'd rather go receiver there and hill to me is the wide receiver one for this week. So Brandon's up with three and four. Yeah. I mean, I knew I wasn't gonna get tie-reak, but now it's a question of skipping running back entirely or making sure my running backs when they get back to me aren't completely setting me back too much. So, I mean, it's between the Rams here with Cooper Cup and Darryl Henderson. Yeah. I'm probably gonna lean Henderson just so that I have one of the running back slots filled because running back's not deep enough to have you guys fill in any flexes and have me. Yeah, I'm gonna have to go with Henderson and give JJ, Tyree, Kill and Cooper Cup to start. Okay, so yeah. I mean, I was basically going either Henderson or Cup with the next pick. I'm gonna go with Cooper Cup and hope that, you know, I do think that Henderson's the RB too. Here, I should probably just pick Cooper Cup.  I do think that Henderson's the RB too in this draft, but I do think there are still some interesting options at running back that, you know, are viable enough. But I would agree that going there, you know, given that you're at the turn, Brandon, it's not the easiest position to be in and you don't wanna let it get screwed at the running back position. So, I want Aaron Jones. And for a salary cap format, I think he's pretty massively over-salaryed, but I think here I'm okay with taking him there. Are you just gonna do it? Oh, sorry. Am I gonna do what? I feel like I know who you might wanna take. Oh, you think I was gonna take someone else? I know who you thought I was gonna take. No, I'm pretty sure, right? I know who you thought I was gonna take, so. Do I? Or what do you think I was gonna do? I mean, don't give away, never mind. Anyway, so I want Aaron Jones. I think that he's over-salaryed for a salary cap to the $8,500. But in a snake draft, I know he will get usage despite the fact that AJ Dillon is there. I know that game is gonna be pretty fun from a scoring perspective, so. I like that quite a bit, and the touch on equity still, oh no, JHA. That's who I thought you would take. He was next up for me anyway. Yeah, okay. I thought I might be able to weasel my way. Who would have thought that Leonard Fournette would got such an S-Storm on this show? Travis Kelsey, off the entry for expected to play. Who is Leonard Fournette? I only know of Sunday afternoon Lenny, he's the only person I've ever heard of. Is that who you're referring to? Yes, yes, of course. So going back to mine, I went Mahomes because, hey, the game's that way. He wanted to ruin everyone else's stack. No, I think it's because the fall-off at quarterback is pretty big after hitting this week from an upside perspective, and that was kind of the key decision point for me there. So you got Kelsey, which means that I'm spread out, meaning every touchdown Mahomes throws benefits, both of you, which is good, or one of you at least. It's fun. And A.J. Brown, he of the runny mess. I feel like what I'm about to do is dumb, but I'm gonna do it because of the game environment and such and the usage, but I'm going Daryl Williams with the next pick. I don't mind that. I think that totally works. I can get behind it, which means, I got Calvin Redley who actually did consider with my pick previously, just given the usage he was getting before he got banged up, and then I'm gonna go, do I go Godwin or D.J. Moore? I think both of them are pretty fun to this week. I was between Ridley Moore and Brown, but because I just took Kelsey, I figured I might as well go Brown for some stacking correlation. Yeah, I think I'm gonna go with D.J. Moore because the target volume there is so good.   So I'm gonna go with I think the best play outside of that game. And it's gonna be Jalen Hertz. I talked a lot about his splits with Lane Johnson. He's a much better quarterback with Lane Johnson, unsurprisingly. Oh boy. This is a, just kind of take your pick between these backs here. Could be D.J. Swift, but I might go Chuba Hubbard. I regret that already. This is putting me in a really weird spot because I think Kyler is the best play straight up here, but I have Stafford with Cooper Cup and I don't know what to do right now. Given the situation. It gives you exposure to Stafford, which is kind of nice. I'm going Kyler. That's the right play. Only because as you noted Jim Stafford, Cooper Cup's gonna see 30% of the team's targets anyway in that game. And if Cooper Cup doesn't go off or doesn't have a good game, I'm not gonna win anyway. So what's the point in doing that? Okay, so our teams are final. Let's talk to JJ first. You did go with Kyler there. I think that was the correct call. And I get worried about blowouts at quarterback. I worry a lot less when it's a running quarterback and I worry a lot less in a three-person format. So I think that both those things are helpful for Kyler here. And you seem concerned about the Daryl Williams pick, but I think that it makes sense. He got a lot of usage last week. He is in that the best game on the board. He got a lot of red zone usage. Six out of 14 chances inside the red zone last week. I think that was the right move regardless of how you thought about it. So to look at like the running back landscape whenever I made that pick, it was like Chuba, Josh Jacobs, Joe Mixon, those kind of running backs that were left. And the way that I see it is, yeah, maybe some of those guys will have better market shares and backfield shares this week. But you could argue that it's not significantly different if there is any difference. And then you're obviously associating him with the team with the highest point total this week that could smash. So might as well just go that direction instead of going with like a Jacobs or someone who's just like a more of a high floor or not super fun play. Yeah, I think that it was the correct call. I love the God on pick too. I really kind of wish I had gone there. But over more, I like both of them, but I think it's I kind of hedged by getting Evans, I guess, later on as like a consolation prize. He had exposure to the Bucks with Antonio Brown and Rob Ramkowski both being ruled out. A big bump up for both of those guys, I would say. I was talking to Brandon about his team. I think Henderson was the correct move once you got those other guys taken away. I'd put him above cup by a little bit. I think that I probably would have gone that way as well. Thoughts in your team here? Yeah, I was trying to piece together which Bucks would have gotten back to me. I know if I didn't take Henderson, one of you would have taken him and that kind of bumps things down. But I would have been looking at like that. Daryl Williams, like Chuba Hubbard, Josh Jacobs range for both of my running backs. That's what I wanted to avoid. I regret not going with Kyler. I'm not that high on Kyler from a salary cap format. But from a floor standpoint, I should have gone there over Hertz. Hertz is the kind of potentially QB2 for me outside of my homes in the salary cap format. I think I was just drawn to that and kind of overlooked Kyler, which is part of the fun but also the strategy of snake draft is to go from breaking down the slate from a salary cap standpoint and then looking at things completely differently. But overall, I mean, can't go wrong with Devonte really. I got a stack of that Chiefs in Titans game. Chuba Hubbard's not gonna, probably not gonna win me this thing but might not lose it for me if he gets the workload that he can get. So, I mean, overall, I know I'm projected for the lowest score but I feel pretty solid. Should have gone with the best running back on the board, Cordero Patterson, like just disrespectful not to go that way.  Like massive, massive oversight there. For mine, I felt good about the Henry Pick and I think I made the right move with Jones.  I think I made a move with Jones. I wish the one I wanted back was Mahomes. I think I should have gone with Fornette there because Fornette versus, you know, DJ Moore or Mike Evans, I think I kinda want Fornette there but honestly, like it broke okay. I liked the Ridley Pick a lot. I was happy that I got him there but kinda sorta think I should have gone elsewhere at quarterback but I guess I can't cry too much if my quarterback is Patrick Mahomes. So either way, we'll see how things break for this week. Someone will take a 3-2-2 lead after this week across the snake draft. Let's transition now to take some questions via YouTube wherever you are watching we'll slide on over there and get your questions out there right now. Let's start things off with Daniel. Are Devonte Freeman and OJ Howard viable by Pocalypse Flex Fillers? Other options include AJ Dillon and Michael Carter. I actually don't mind AJ Dillon this week but JJ, preference for you in that situation. Devonte Freeman versus OJ Howard, AJ Dillon and Michael Carter. I would lean the running backs in this case over a guy like Howard who is pretty unpredictable like what his usage is gonna look like. I expect like, I think a guy like Tyler Johnson is really interesting if he's a guy in your waiver wire to flex above someone like OJ Howard. Don't just think about Gronk is out and therefore this tight end on the Buccaneers is gonna step in and fill Gronk's shoes. It's more so Antonio Brown is out too and in 11 personnel we're gonna see Tyler Johnson because Scotty Miller for the record is on IR. So Tyler Johnson to me is a very, very intriguing sleeper this week and I would go that. I know that he wasn't part of that question but if he's on the waiver wire which he is in the majority of leagues and probably go that direction of that group though. I do think AJ Dillon is probably still my pick. I know that with what's his name? I'm just like completely having a brain fart but with the Baltimore backfield the way that it is with Latavius Murray out my gosh I couldn't think about Latavius with Latavius Murray out. I do think that there's still gonna be a split backfield Tyson Williams is probably gonna be active in that game. They're still they're not gonna see a running back have 50% of that backfield because we haven't seen that all season long. Freeman could see some receiving work but AJ Dillon is probably gonna see a similar backfield share as Devonte Freeman would. And I sort of trust the Green Bay offense more this week than I would the Baltimore offense. So I'd probably lean AJ Dillon of that running back group and I can't believe I couldn't remember Latavius Murray's name. Well, I mean, it's there's no point honestly. I didn't worry about that from the center. Yeah. Yeah, no, I was like, wait, who's that? I was like, leave me out. I was like, leave me on Bell's playing. Tyson Williams, who's the other guy?  So like we've all been there for before. Grim fan is asking Christian Kirk or T.Y. Hilton. I don't know if Hilton's gonna play. He's questionable. So I'd probably go Kirk just to get access to that game there. DJ says I'm always low on Kendrick Bourne. Yeah, I am low on a guy who's had more than five targets once this year and has exceeded 30 yards three times. Just it's a tough one for me to get behind there. Let's talk to you, Brian. Let's go to Brandon with this one. You tried to talk me to Sam Darnold. I said no. And I still say no. Tannehill or Darnold this week? Tannehill. Tannehill's got good splits. So he's played two top three defenses based on number fires projection or metrics. Four outside the top 20, I think. And two of those with AJ Brown in those games with AJ Brown against comparable defenses to the Chiefs. He's doubled off the league average in passing efficiency. It is still Sam Darnold week. I think there's a lot that could be turned around for Sam Darnold in a more promising matchup. But for me, it's gonna be Tannehill on that one. No shot. No shot. Let me also talk about how Tannehill has not been nearly as bad as what people generally think. I mean, when you look at the context, like as Brandon just did and alluded to, but the other thing too with the Titans that people need to like realize is that, yes, Derek Henry's bee sting. I understand he's very, very good. But the way the Titans are scoring touchdowns right now, the rate of scoring them on the ground is not gonna continue at this rate through the rest of the season. They've had a 0.5 pass to rush touchdown ratio. That's something that we just haven't seen over the last decade. It doesn't happen. Expect a little bit more regression from that perspective. And that means more passing touchdowns for Ryan Tannehill. And it sounds like Julio's gonna play this week, which is a pretty big upgrade for Tannehill. I know that he hasn't like- Yeah, which is surprising. He's been more dependent on AJ Brown playing, but like it's still Julio freaking Jones. So I'll take it for sure. Ryan, would you trade Alvin Camara for Tyree Kill and Devontae Smith? Alvin Camara's bi-week is past, but that's a pretty good return. So, JJ, are you accepting that one or no? Yeah, I mean, I think that I feel like Camara should be the side that has an extra piece to it almost. I would almost just say the Camara for Tyreex swap makes sense, but getting Devontae Smith with it too, who's, you know, he's seen a healthy target share this season and you know, rookies tend to start slower and they can finish the season stronger and Devontae Smith is good. So I would do that all day. Yeah, I mean, especially if you're good at the running back position. Absolutely, me as well. Let's talk to Joseph. This one is for Brandon. I'm gonna ask you to rank all these guys. Jalen Waddle, Robbie Anderson, Darnell Mooney, Marquez Callaway and AJ Green. Weirdly, none of them are that bad. Those are all pretty good options, I would say. Any preference for you on that list, Brandon? Do you want? I mean, none of them are, I guess, that efficient. But anyway, how are you viewing this group here? To rank them, I'm gonna go with my projections. I have them. Jalen Waddle, Robbie Anderson, Darnell Mooney, AJ Green, Marquez Callaway. It's the most exactly in that order. I might go Mooney over Robbie.  So. Well, I think it's pretty clearly Waddle for me, number one, I guess. There's a case for all of them but for me, it's gonna be Jalen number one. From there, it's pretty close in terms of my projections. So it's kind of multiple coin flips but probably Waddle, Anderson Mooney, I think would be the top three. Yeah, I think, I'm into Mooney this week. I like Mooney this week too. And look, I wouldn't be surprised. Not that you can play him in season long very confidently or even DFS to some degree but I do think that this could be an Allen Robinson get right week as well. It needs to be because I am starting both those guys in one super flex league. So what could go wrong? Team is doing great, as I'm sure you predicted. Let's talk to Luke. Would you guys rather start Rashad Bateman or Corey Davis in the flex? I'm okay with both. I'd probably go Bateman here though, JJ. Do you agree with that? Yeah, I mean, think of it this way. Both guys project to have a similar target share this week and Bateman has the better matchup, has the better quarterback, probably gonna end up having maybe a little less passing volume in the offense but I could see both of these guys having like six to nine targets this week and I would rather have Bateman in that scenario because the matchups better and the offense is better and that is very nice. Bateman's also $5,300 on Fandal this week and I'm inclined to have a whole lot of that personally. Let's talk to DJ. Brandon, would you start Jacoby Myers this week? No additional options but I feel like in most situations given all the buys this week it's probably gonna, you're probably not gonna have a lot of choice here. He's probably right. Yeah, so this is the perfect place to like plug the start-sit article that I publish which looks at not just like- Do you like that, Brandon? You can find that on numberfire.com. Oh, okay, nice. It goes through basically every relevant fantasy asset and their range of outcomes in terms of their odds to finish top 12 or in this case, top 24 at receiver then you can kind of mix and match and compare within the position to see who, because Jacoby Myers to start or sit is a hard question but I feel like he would be generally fine to start but this is a really good spot where I can plug that article which I think is helpful here. On the great site, numberfire.com. Let's talk to Kyle sticking with you, Brandon. Where would you rank a buck stack this week? So Antonio Brown and Rob Gronkowski both ruled out. The bucks are heavy favorites but it's a game that's like kind of fun from like a total perspective. We're probably gonna see if the bears dare it out a little bit. The targetry are narrowed down here as well and we've seen the bucks throw a lot when they're ahead too. So of the heavily favored teams this week, my level of concern is lowest with the Buccaneers. So Brandon, now that we know Brown and Gronkowski, you're out. Where are you ranking the buck stacks this week? Yeah, so my projections aren't fully updated for the Antonio Brown news. My tip, I actually have my 90th percentile stack scores even before adjusting for that. The Brady Godwin and the Brady Evans stack were top 15 for the main slate, which doesn't sound necessarily great but that looks at Mahomes plus Hill, Mahomes plus Kelsey, Lamar plus all his past catchers, things like that. I would probably bump them up to, that's like a top three, top 14 to stack at this point. I would say the Chiefs salary-wise still the Titans, possibly Lamar and his past catchers, but you have more surprisingly more past catchers for the Ravens now than the Buccaneers would consider. So I think they're way up the board since we talked yesterday about the slate. Yeah, I think that they're pretty fun. I think that where I agreed your rankings, I would say the tipping point for me is, do I rank Brady slash Godwin or Evans higher than Hertz and Devante Smith? And I think they're very even. I can go either way with that one. I think that's where I'm at. And that to me is a very positive view of them. JJ, preference for you between Mike Evans and $7,100 and Chris Godwin at 67? So I like both and I haven't had a hard time deciding. Yeah, I mean, I'd probably just lean the cheaper of the two just to play it safe and have a little bit more exposure that way because I think both will end up projecting, here's the other thing too. I like the matchup in the slot against the Bears every single week. And I think there's a bit, I mean, we're gonna see more of that with Godwin even though they'll both play the perimeter. So I'll probably lean Godwin a little bit more plus you get the salary cap relief. But obviously, you know, Mike Evans has two plus touched on upside every time he touches the field. Yep, both are good. That's the answer for here. Let's go back to JJ here by talking to CJ getting the initials here. Which side do you prefer rest of season? Stafford, DK Metcalfos, Neckler or Aaron Rodgers with Devontae Adams, who? And James Robinson, preference for you, JJ, on that one. I don't think this is particularly that close. I don't know about you guys, but I'm taking the Rodgers side pretty easily. I mean, I- For Devontae, right? Yeah, yeah.  And then you're looking at DK versus Devontae Adams. Now, if Russ were healthy, this would be a different discussion. I think it would be a lot closer of a trade, but with Russ not being healthy, and I still think there's a non-zero chance Russ doesn't play the rest of the season, just because they could be very bad and they might not want to rush them back. I'm not saying that's going to happen. I just think there's a chance that that happens. And Devontae Adams has like a 36, 37% target share this year. He's doing what he did last year, basically, the touchdowns just haven't been there. And then James Robinson, someone who I talked about on my 15 transaction show this week, he's someone who I think is a buy right now, despite performing really well, because the numbers are there, the backfield shares there, but all the while, the rest of season schedule for Robinson is very, very, very strong. I love Echler. There's a downgrade from Echler to Robinson, don't get me wrong, but I think the upgrade from DK to Devontae Adams makes that trade worthwhile. With the Russ news, it's very easy for me to go there, especially with how Robinson's doing. It's no question for me. You had to talk to your old Adam. Would you start Christian Kirk or Michael Pitt in your flex spot this week? It'd be a complication here. I'd go to Pittman every time. The problem is weather looks real nasty for Sunday Night Football because there is rain and there is wind, rough combination. So I still lean Pittman because of the volume, but it makes me really, really nervous there with where the weather is at. So I don't know. I would check back on that on Sunday to see where the weather is. If it improves, go to Pittman. If not, we'll see. Aaron, who's the goat? Good question. I'm ready. Chad Pennington? Okay. Well, we went different angles there. I'm gonna go Chad Pennington. You can go with LeBron if you want, but it's like Chad Penning probably LeBron and basketball. I don't know. I'll decide that one later. Grim fan just traded T. Higgins and Ann Zacharitz. Who won the trade? I'm assuming this means T. Higgins for Zacharitz. I'd probably still want the T. Higgins side of that one. He actually leads the Bengals and Targets in the games he's played with Jamar Chase. He's not getting any deep work, which is super annoying, but I still think I still want that situation for me personally over EARTS. What do you think, JJ? Yeah. I mean, EARTS is still probably a low-end Titan one at best in this new environment. We talked about this gym in our show. Is it an upgrade for EARTS? But I'm gonna say that it is an upgrade for EARTS, but not dramatically enough. All right, let's talk to the Rosenberg. Is Antonio Gibson a sit this week? Given the projected game script, would Devante Freeman be a better option? So Brandon, you have your numbers, which show you range of outcomes for Antonio Gibson versus Devante Freeman. I feel like even with the concerns around Antonio Gibson, we're still going with him over Devante Freeman at least, right? Yeah. He said that he's gonna play, like that was basically the report there for Gibson. So that's at least encouraging that he wants to play. No, there is a game script concern, but also that game overall should lead to some points. And if Antonio Gibson's playing, he can still get the goal line work within that offense. So I'm gonna have a hard time trusting any Baltimore back in anything that's remotely better than that situation. I would go with Gibson there. Yeah, I think that I would as well, just because like if there were a better alternative, I would consider it, but in that situation, I'm just gonna go with Antonio Gibson. Aaron says Brady is a goat. So you're playing Hertz over him. Don't do a gym. Aaron, I can use a don't do a gym reminder at all times, like for a lot of situations. This is a more broad evergreen comment and I appreciate it. So thank you either way. Update on the grim fan trade. It was T Higgins and Zach Ertz for Deontay Johnson. I think that's the actual trade here. You're getting Deontay Johnson, who gets a ton of targets. I feel like here, I'd actually, I'd prefer the Deontay side. JJ easily with that. Yeah, okay. Cool. I wanna make sure that was correct. Okay. Joseph, Remandre Stevenson or Devontay Freeman. This one's closer. JJ, what you got here? Probably going Freeman only because, you know, I love Stevenson. I've been talking up Stevenson in the last few weeks, but Freeman, I think is a better lock to see work. Now Stevenson was asleep around my show this week. And one of the main reasons is if you look at adjusted target share allowed to the running back position, New York is actually first in the league this season. And Stevenson, obviously running more routes this past week. But, you know, I don't want people to confuse Stevenson running the most routes in the team with Stevenson running all of the routes for the New England back. But it's more of a trend than anything else where maybe that trend continues and he sees even more this week. But let's just wait and see and wait for that to happen. And just kind of go with the guy in a time share who's probably gonna see, you know, 10 attempts and three targets or four targets in the back. Yeah. I think that I'd agree with that as well. Okay. That is all the time that we have here for today in the SnakeDraft Q&A. Quick reminder from Samuel to check out the late round podcast. Thanks for tuning in. Appreciate that, Samuel. Check out the late round podcast wherever you get your podcasts. You can find JJ on Twitter at late round QB JJ. Good luck to you in week number seven and thanks for coming on for today. Appreciate it. Thanks for having me. Brandon, you can find him on Twitter at Kudula13. Brandon, good luck to you again outside of the SnakeDraft. I appreciate you. Have a good weekend as well. Thank you, Jim. All right. I am on Twitter at Jim Sonnis. J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. Big thank you to Joy Affleck, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you, Joy, as always. And thank you to everyone for tuning in. We appreciate all of you. Have a great week seven. We'll talk to you once again next week for another SnakeDraft. This has been the Fan2alive Q&A.


Our third panelist, Philippa Boul, Philippa is the non-communicable disease advisor and leader of the chronic disease group in MSF Switzerland. Her presentation will be on chronic non-communicable care in the untypical refugee setting in northern Lebanon. Thank you. I'm interested, very interested. Hello. Hi, so I move us of course to a very different setting now that of the Middle East context and of a refugee setting and how we look to address the management of a large cohort of non-communicable disease patients in this setting. So Lebanon is a country of almost... hosting almost 6 million people at the moment. Of these, almost one... there is approximately 1.2 million Syrian refugees registered in the country. And since the beginning of 2012, MSF launched the medical response to the big influx of refugees from Syria. And we're currently based in three locations, the cities of Saida and Tripoli and the broad region of the Beka Valley. And in two of these projects in the Beka Valley and Tripoli, we integrate non-communicable disease care into five of the primary health care clinics that we run. Now, just a note on Lebanon. The medical system there is highly privatised. It's quite specialised. So, for example, patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes are often used to seeing endocrinologists and cardiologists. And there is quite a strong pharmaceutical lobby, so use of generic medicines is not that common and not that well-accepted. There is a very high prevalence of NCDs in the region, as Faud has already pointed out. For example, in Syria before the war, attributable mortality to NCDs was about 77%. So, MSF so far really has relatively limited experience in the management of NCDs and certainly not in this open refugee setting where refugees were spread throughout the country and not sort of confined in camps. And in the middle income contest where the medical, the health system is quite different to the systems in many places in which we work. So, therefore, for us it was very important to understand the feasibility of the model which we implemented, which was different to sort of the existing model of care there. And to understand a couple of particular aspects of our program, one being a home glucose monitoring program that was implemented last year, the other to understand the high rate of defaults that we found so that we could adjust the program appropriately. We therefore undertook a descriptive study using retrospective review of program data, data which had been collected in aggregate tables designed by the field team. And so, in order to respond to this high level of NCDs, amongst this Syrian refugees, there are a couple of things that we needed to do given that we didn't have existing tools or an existing experience on which to base the response. So, one of the first things we did was to work on developing guidelines to support our teams. So, these were based on existing international guidelines but very much adapted to be simplified algorithms that could be easily followed by our medical staff and rationalizing the drug list and the sort of broad range of drugs that's normally used in the country to a very essential drug list and then also having a simplified list of investigations for routine follow-up of the patients. We developed a model of care which was based on a general practitioner system. So, and again, the general practitioners in the country were not so used to managing these types of patients, particularly the more complicated patients. So, in a way, this was a type of task shifting we were already doing in this setting, but we task shifted further to use nurses to do the routine follow-up of patients and community health workers as a key part of the patient education team. Then we integrated this care into the primary health care where acute patients were being seen and we were also providing sexual and reproductive health care. But we had an appointment system with regular follow-up for these patients and we had specified patient files that we developed. We had to support our teams with this and we held a workshop in the country with some international experts to discuss with our field doctors and nurses on these protocols of management. And we have an international physician who's based in the field to support with the daily management. This is just an example of some of the guidelines that we developed and the type of patient algorithms that we have inside the guidelines. And then we have very much step-by-step use of drugs and we have tables to help the doctors shift patients from often the quite complicated medication regimes they are on to the more simplified regimens according to our essential drug list. Then in the middle of last year we implemented a home glucose monitoring program and this was to really assist our doctors who one of the things they struggled with the most was the insulin management of patients and this is in a context where many of the patients did not have access to glucometers or were unable to afford the quite expensive strips for glucometer use. And so our doctors were struggling to really adjust the insulin appropriately based on the measurements we were getting in the clinic. And so we designed a program where for select patients, namely those on insulin and those who are unstable on the insulin but who were adherent to the program so they'd been coming to us regularly for a period of at least three months were given glucometers with a certain number of strips and instructions on when and how to use those strips. And really the objective was to help the physicians with adjustment of the insulin. We followed the patients with HBA1Cs before provision of glucometers and at three months afterwards and had specific questionnaires designed for the patients and the practitioners at that three month mark and our infield expert did a file review of the files at this time. So in terms of the results we've had so far I'll go very quickly through numbers but we've seen over eight and a half thousand patients pass through our care between 2012 and 2014 of which almost 3,600 at the end of last year were in routine follow up and had been seen at least in the last three months. And this represents about 20% of the consultations that are seen in our clinics. I won't go, as I said in too much detail through this but just to show that we still do have a significant number of defaulters the 33% at the end of last year which is why we undertook the defulter analysis. In terms of the morbidities that we see the most common diagnosis is hypertension followed by type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Now what this graph doesn't show is in fact the co-morbidities and if you look at the number of diagnoses we have it's more than twice the number of patients so a large cohort of our patients are really being managed with multi-morbidities. The defulter tracing sincere apologies there are some errors on this but I'm going to upload the right line after this in terms of the numbers. At the end of last year though so look at me, not the numbers. At the end of last year because of the high rates of defaulters the team actually did a complete file review and tried to trace every patient that had not been seen within the last three months. So they managed to find in both Becker and Tripoli about 30% of the patients and of these they found that quite a number of patients actually moved locations so some of them back to Syria and others within Lebanon. Then of the other reasons for defaulting in fact they differed a bit between the project locations and the team found it was quite interesting to analyse these and see how to adjust the project and found a couple of things. For example some patients had decided to stop taking their medication some patients had difficulty with access to the program and in Tripoli in fact as of last week opened a new clinic in the north of the area partly in response to realising that patients were having difficulty coming back to us for follow-up. The team in Tripoli disaggregated the defaulters by year and certainly found the defaulter rate had decreased from 2012 to 2014 as had a number of the reasons for defaulting. So for example one of the reasons for service in the clinics and this decreased by 2014 and in fact in that time the team had made some quite significant emphasis on trying to implement an appointment system and decrease the waiting times and change the patient flow. The home glucose monitoring system by the end of 2014 we had 85 patients enrolled in the program the majority of these patients with type 1 diabetes with a mean HBA1C of 10.28 on admission to the program now unfortunately at the time of analysis we didn't have very many follow-up HBA1C of those we did have all of them had decreased. We found that 61% of patients were self adjusting their insulin and in fact this wasn't the primary or the initial objective of the program it was initially to firstly help the clinicians with the monitoring and certainly 88% of them on file review were found to be appropriately managing to adjust the insulin according to the results so it was providing proving helpful for them but certainly the team now will look at how to support the patients better as they are using this themselves and on the quality of questionnaires patients were actually feeling a lot more comfortable having the glucometer at home with the management of their disease. So in conclusion in terms of the default tracing I haven't gone through a lot of detail with that but a lot of what the team found were things that they felt able to try and address the default is in a more timely manner particularly and so now they implement a routine system of trying to trace patients who've not been seen in three months to see what the reasons are for them not attending the clinic. For example there were a small number who were unable to attend for apparently being bed bound and we're going to have a system of social workers being able to do some home visits for these patients and so we will do this regularly from now on and then further review to see whether we need to continue. The home glucose monitoring results I mean the initial results from both the qualitative but the very limited quantitative showed some improvements in the patient control but certainly we need to be monitoring that a bit more closely with our doctors to get better results out of it. In terms of the lessons learned from the cohort analysis using these simplified protocols having the expert to support our doctors has enabled this task shifting. Certainly at the beginning of the program it was very difficult for our doctors to manage some of these patients and particularly those on insulin and then for the nurses to do the routine follow up but so far it's working successfully with this thing and we've managed to rationalise the costs in the sense that we previously had a very broad list of medications all of our medication is bought in Lebanon and there was a high use of investigations and now we have these very simplified list of investigations and medications that are used. The appointment system and having the dedicated patient files and a dedicated patient service circuit has allowed for improved follow up of the patients. We were quite limited in this analysis though by some difficulties with the data tools which were inconsistent between the projects and at the moment we're in the process of implementing a better data system that will be used throughout the mission. This will be an ongoing work the other significant component of the ongoing work is putting a lot more work in emphasis into the patient education system and we're looking at further areas of operational research one of which will be looking at simplifying medication administration such as use of the poly pill for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We've now been able to utilise components of the project in other settings so in the emergency context in Iraq we're able to utilise some of the things such as the patient files and the algorithms as well as Syria and very different contexts such as South Sudan where we adapt it to the context. Big thanks to the field teams for their work in this program. I heard that the teams in Lebanon may be watching today so I hope they are because I present on their behalf and also big thanks to the innovation unit in OCG who are the ones who helped us to develop the guidelines that we're using. Thank you very much. Wonderful group all on time so that's great. I'm happy for that. So starting with technical questions let's start from behind please the lady in yellow. Doris from Vienna Evaluation Unit thank you very much Philippa I have just one question if I have understood right you said you have changed a drug regimen to a less to a simpler one so I would like to know if you know accepted by the patients to have less drugs and first change to another drug regimen. Sure no in fact and when I say simpler it's really simpler compared to the existing context not certainly compared to perhaps the way MSF would normally do it it has been a very difficult thing and it's required a lot of efforts in terms of patient education and certainly in the follow-up of default to tracing one of the reasons for defaulting was dissatisfaction with the drugs or was patients deciding to get their drugs from elsewhere and in fact that had slightly increased over time as we had actually rationalised the list because at the very beginning we did have a much broader medication list in the emergency context before we rationalised it. So it is an issue and it's something that as I said the patient support component of the program is something we're really putting a lot of work and effort into doing at the moment and we've just implemented we have now a new dedicated patient support nurse as the normal nurse doctor and community health worker we have someone to follow up the more complicated patients and provide more ongoing education in the end though I guess we are still seeing hopefully those who are the more vulnerable and unable to get medication elsewhere and we still do have very large numbers in our cohort so I mean the acceptance is it's not completely unaccepted and we will continue to work on proper explanations to the patients to explain why these regimens are needed. For the clinicians of course it was also different to what they were doing and this is one of the reasons we had this workshop with international specialists to explain the evidence base and we really made sure it was very evidence based guidelines and we could support the clinicians to understand that and how to utilise these drugs. Question please here. Hello, Alvaro from Action Against Cancer in Spain we have some programs in Lebanon in the Bacavali they're actually CAST transfer programs and we are using mobile phone technologies to communicate with beneficiaries I wonder if this is something you explore and what would be your take on using massive SMS communication in order to decrease default rates to understand what's the situation of the cohorts. Thank you for the question I'm going to come and talk to you because it's something I'm very interested in I'd be interested in your results we have discussed it within the team and of course we used this for the default of tracing but we found significant difficulties and a number of patients who had changed telephone numbers regularly or the telephone number was not working anymore we now have a chance to facilitate that but the initial discussions we weren't so sure how successful it would be in terms of the proportion of patients would be able to follow up but it's certainly something we're thinking about and I'd love to hear your experience. If I can have the privilege of being here also I will not raise but just to add the complexity of the situation when working in a context of let's say Lebanon in this case which is very private system of health facilities where there's like a sort of non-camp refugees there's no camps in official camps in Lebanon so I can see how work would be difficult to present sometimes a different approach for treating with a problem like there it's a third question last question now so please. Hi there thank you very much for that really interesting presentation I was just wondering if you had a method because you were talking about catchment areas you were talking about access to these clinics did you have a method for identifying clusters of high rates of NCDs and particularly I guess diabetes? Not in terms of identifying clusters as such certainly we chose in the Becker Valley we chose our clinic locations strategically to try and cover not only different parts of the Becker Valley but of course places where there was less access to care in general and also different types of population groups and then in Tripoli as I said we were initially based in one location but now we're spreading to another because we realised we actually we do routinely collect information about where the patients come from and we realised we needed to spread elsewhere but in terms of the NCDs we're not looking for clustering as such we have done some access to healthcare studies we've done a series of those studies some of them quite recently at the end of last year to look at different health needs and different aspects of access to healthcare so I can discuss those with you later if you like Thank you very much Felipa


Hello and welcome to another session on problem solving related to factor theorem in this question It's given that if a y cube plus b y square plus y minus 6 has y plus 2 as a factor So y plus 2 is a factor of this given polynomial in y and leaves a remainder for When divided by y minus 2 find the value of a and b This is the question now This is a mix of both remainder as well as factor theorem. It seems both the theorems are going to be utilized over here. So let's Utilize the knowledge of our factor theorem and remember theorem to solve this question now, so Let us say Fy Right. It is a polynomial in y. So let's say f y is a y cube Plus b y square Plus y minus 6 Right. This is the polynomial in y now given that y plus 2 is a Factor of f y and Then hence, what do we know then f of minus 2 must be 0 If you recall what was factor theorem, let me Write it here, right? So if f x or rather the factor theorem suggested said that if if a x plus b is a factor of Fx Then what do we what did we have then f of minus b upon a is 0 Right. If you compare in this case a x plus b is y plus 2 Right here clearly The and now don't get confused between this a here This a this b is Different from this a and b Right. So this is a general generic term a x plus b in this question We are supposed to find this a and this b. So don't get confused Okay, so general a x plus b if it is a factor of f x then f of minus b by a is 0 In this case our a x plus b is y plus 2 Only the variable x is replaced by y value of a that is coefficient of the variable is 1 and The constant term is 2.  So and see if you see here. I'm using f of minus 2 is 0.  So wherever you see why write minus 2, correct? This is what is meant by value of the polynomial at y is equal to 2 or minus 2 rather in this case Minus 2 minus 6. This must be 0 Is it so let's solve minus 2 cube is minus 8. So minus 8 a minus 2 square is plus 4 b and Then minus 2 minus 6 is minus 8 is equal to 0 Is it so you got the first equation you can always simplify it and this will be you can Take away 4 from or minus 4 rather. So if you divide this entire equation by minus 4 What will you get you will get 2 a minus b? Plus 2 is 0 Right, so this is equation number one Then by the second condition. What is the second condition that it leaves? remainder 4 when divided by y minus 2 so then why remainder theorem by remainder theorem, you know that If fx is divided by ax plus b then f of minus b by a is the remainder. So in this case f of 2 Will be equal to 4 Is it right? What is the remainder theorem guys? The remainder theorem says if fx is divided by Any linear expression ax plus b ax plus b then remainder is simply F of minus b by a Right remainder is equal to minus b by a right in factor theorem. This is the same remainder becomes 0 now Reminder is given to be equal to 4. So f of 2 must be 4 So f of 2 let's kind of let's find out f of 2. So by remainder theory, we'll get f 2 is equal to 4 So a 2 cube plus b 2 square plus 2 minus 6 which we must be equal to 4 So 8 a plus 4 b minus 4 is equal to 4 after simplification and dividing the entire equation by 4 you'll get this much Simplifying you can say this is 2 a Plus b is equal to 2 This is equation number 2 Or you can write 2 a plus b minus 2 is equal to 0. This is equation number 2 Now let's rewrite both the equations together. So we get 2 a minus b plus 2 is equal to 0 and We get 2 a plus b minus 2 is equal to 0 guys Okay, so you'll get this is 2 now if you add both these equations that is I am doing 1 Plus 2 that means LHS of 1 plus RHS of 1 is equal to sorry LHS of 1 plus LHS of 2 Will be equal to RHS of 1 plus RHS of 2. So let's add them together What will you get 2 a plus 2 a will get you 4 a minus b plus b is 0 Plus 2 minus 2 is again 0 and this entire thing is 0. That means a has to be 0 so we get a 0 So if a 0 we can deploy in any of these equations. So in the first equation if you see from 1 Minus b plus 2 will be 0 because a was 0. So hence b is equal to 2 Okay, so we could find out the value of a and Value of 2 what did we apply or what was the underlying concept first? We applied factor theorem found out one equation then applied remainder theorem found out the second equation solve the two equations in linear equations and We got the value of a and b. So while solving this linear equation. Please remember how to solve this is you know Adding and substitution adding and subtracting may help there is another way of Solving linear equations in two variables called the substitution method Which you can have a look on our course on linear equations in two variables


My dear friends from all over the world, it gives me great pleasure to address you as we prepare for the second International Day of Yoga. This unique occasion that brings all of us together to celebrate the invaluable gift of India's ancient tradition. When I outlined a vision for an International Yoga Day in September 2014 at the United Nations General Assembly, even I did not anticipate the enormous enthusiasm for the occasion from all corners of the world. Your support and participation last year and once again now redeems our commitment to nurture and promote this ancient discipline and re-affirms yoga as an exemplary manifestation of Vasudha Kutum Kham, the world as one family. I recall the iconic images from that momentous day last year, all the way from the Pacific Islands to Port of Spain, from Vladivostok to Vancouver and from Copenhagen to Cape Town, thousands gathered to unite the bodies and minds through the practice of yoga. And the reverberations of discipline found a natural home at the UN headquarters in New York where the journey had begun. I myself was fortunate to celebrate the event along with 36,000 of my fellow citizens and foreign guests in New Delhi. As so many of you have already discovered, yoga is much more than a physical exercise. It enables us to exercise a new dimension of the self even while providing a holistic approach to preventive healthcare and wellness. Yoga helps us to restore our balance and furnaces us with a much needed sense of clarity. And through its unifying power we seek completeness and at the same time a oneness with the world. Today all of you are the ambassadors of yoga, taking forward India's ancient message to the world. I thank you for your commitment and welcome you as sisters and brothers of India's family.