What is going on guys, welcome back to the channel and I appreciate you being here. Today I bring you another Destiny 2 video and today I will explain exactly what the prismatic matrix is as I'm seeing many people are a little confused on this matter and this new feature to Destiny 2. But remember guys if you do enjoy the video and it helps you out, hitting that like button truly helps me and my channel out and I do appreciate that support. Okay so let's get into it. This is what Bungie say about this new addition. In the January development update we spoke of shifting the balance of vanity content in favour of activity rewards rather than purely through Eververse. We first addressed this balance by adding vanity rewards to crucible nightfall strikes and raid activities to further improve the overall Eververse experience. A new feature we're calling the prismatic matrix will debut in season 3. This feature has been developed with three key goals in mind. Give players more control over how they earn Eververse items. Offer a more predictable path each week that guarantees access to specific items and drop fewer duplicate items. At release the prismatic matrix will feature 10 Eververse items from season 3 each week it is active. Each item within the prismatic matrix is on a knock out list which means every player is guaranteed to receive all featured items for a given week by the 10th activation earning items via bright engrams bright dust or previous matrix activations but also not rewards after list. In turn each activation guarantees players an item that they may have never previously acquired. With your first well rested level up each week you'll earn a prismatic facet allowing one free use of the prismatic matrix. Prismatic facets stack up to 3 so make sure you have proper inventory space before earning a rank up and a given week. Players can also purchase more activations for 200 silver each. Outside of the prismatic matrix players may continue to earn bright engrams each time they level up and they can still purchase these engrams if they want a chance to get everything from the season 3 catalogue. Additionally we're increasing the number of items available from tests each week with bright dust from 14 to 18 items. We want to continue experimenting and evolving Eververse to improve player experience and give more paths to earn Eververse rewards. Please give us your feedback once season 3 begins as we're dedicated to improving these systems moving forward. Ok so this prismatic matrix is basically a feature to allow you to eventually earn all of their Eververse loot within the running season. Each week the prismatic matrix will feature 10 different items from Eververse's stock. Each week you can earn one prismatic facet across all 3 characters so a max of 1 per week but you can stack up to 3 so if 2 weeks pass and you haven't used your prismatic facet on the 3rd week you get 3 tries. Leave it longer than 3 weeks without using the prismatic matrix and you will lose out on a prismatic facet because like I said they only stack up to a max of 3. So the 10 items featured on the list they are items obtainable via bright engrams and via bright dust purchases from Eververse. If you already own an item which is featured within the prismatic matrix it will be grayed out. Even if you've deleted said item it will still be grayed out duplicates can only come from bright engrams and not the prismatic matrix. You earn the prismatic facet per level up like I said only 1 per week across all 3 characters if you have 3 lilies. The items within the prismatic matrix are random so you don't get to pick the said item you want if it's available. There's still RNG playing its part here and because you can only earn 1 per week one of these prismatic facets per week the chances of getting the item you want if you don't own any other featured items within the prismatic matrix are obviously at a 1 in 10 chance. Additionally what Bungie are doing here is taking a select stack of 10 items from Eververse's loot and teasing us with them making us want to play the game to get said items.  To see what's within the prismatic matrix you have to use the prismatic facet. So when you do this you have no choice but to receive an item you can't back out of it and save said prismatic facet to use within another week if there's no specific item you want here. Once you click on that prismatic facet the matrix will boot up and you'll get a random item off the list of 10 items it has here. You cannot see what this matrix offers without using the facet. Why I suggest you do is then play things smart and actually because I believe said prismatic matrixes will be the same each week for everybody just wait for someone you can trust i.e me to post an image of said weeks prismatic matrix then instead of instantly using your prismatic facet if there's an item you see here you want farm bright engrams and do this up until you knock out items on that week's prismatic matrix because obtaining said loot from bright engrams that are offered on the prismatic matrix will gray them out on that list meaning there's more of a chance in you getting that said item you want and that's honest advice guys bungee obviously although I won't say it want you to use your prismatic facet as soon as you get it you'll then see an item you really want and because obviously you won't be rewarded that said item you want you'll think about buying silver to spend 200 each time for a chance of getting that piece of gear you're after there's no doubt about it in my opinion guys now although this feature is a good one and it does allow us to chase said items if not used correctly you'll just be wasting your prismatic facets each week like I said if there's an item you know is available that week don't use your prismatic facet until you are farmed as many items off the prismatic matrix list as you possibly can in said week then use your prismatic facets this will obviously increase your chances of getting that specific item you want from the prismatic matrix list and if you somehow get the item you are chasing from the prismatic matrix list via a bright engram well that means next week you have an extra prismatic facet to use and that guys is honestly what I would do and guys we have come to the end of the video I hope this clears up a few things for you if you're still confused and I have any questions let me know down below within that comment section but guys we've come to the end of video hope you enjoyed it if you did leave a like really does help me out and as always guys I will see you on that next one


Hello and welcome to International Daily Roundup by People's Dispatch, where we bring you major news developments from around the world, our headlines. Another female journalist, arrested in Egypt, workers of Alcova, San Sipria plant in Spain start indefinite strike, Trump administration targets China, revives red-scare immigration laws, Bolivia school government opens doors to NGO intervention in domestic politics, and Communist Party worker murdered by Hindu fundamentalist groups in India. First story on Sunday, Egyptian authorities arrested journalist Basma Mustafa while she was travelling to Luxor to cover the alleged murder of a man in a police raid last week. Mustafa, who works with the news website Almanasa, had arrived in Luxor on Saturday. She had informed her colleagues about security forces following her. Following this, contact with her was lost for the next 24 hours. She was reportedly produced before a prosecutor at the Egyptian state security prosecution in Cairo and was sent to 15 days in judicial custody. According to some reports, her lawyers were initially unable to learn the charges against her as they were not allowed to attend the investigation. However, according to the AP news agency, she has been charged with spreading false news and joining a terrorist organization. Basma Mustafa has covered the death of a man in police custody in Cairo last month. She was covering unrest caused by another death of a man known as Eway Saldravi who is 38 years old.  The Almanasa website she works for is banned by Egyptian authorities for operating without proper permission. According to Madha Massar, an independent news outlet in Egypt, more than 500 websites have been blocked by Egyptian authorities citing the same reason. Last June, Almanasa's editor Nora Yunis was also arrested briefly after a raid at her office. She has been charged with running a website without proper permission. In our next story, workers of US-based aluminum giant Alcovas Melter in San Ciprias Spain have intensified their protest against the closure of the plant. On October 4th, at Sunday, hundreds of workers of the plant and auxiliaries related to the plant started an indefinite strike. They were demanding job protection and government intervention to continue production. The jobs of more than 500 workers at its stake after Alcova had decided to close its Melter in San Ciprias citing huge losses. The crisis faced by the workers intensified on September 27th, when negotiations between Alcova and UK-based Liberty House for the sale of the plant failed. The San Ciprias factory employs about 1,100 workers, 500 of these are involved in the production of alumina and 600 in the production of primary aluminum. The company has decided to lay off 534 workers in the primary aluminum plant, which is likely to affect hundreds of secondary jobs as well. Alberto Vilata, the head of the steel and basic metals sector of the Federation of Industry of General Union of Workers, that is a UGT, pointed out that Alcova had already closed two plants last year and the plant in contention was the last in the country for the production of primary aluminum. In our next story, the United States has released new policy guidelines for residents or a citizenship to disallow people with communist affiliations. In a notification issued on Friday, that's October 2nd, the U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services stated that individuals with affiliations to a communist party or any other totalitarian party shall be deemed inadmissible for permanent residents or citizenship. While the guideline neither specifies the communist party it is targeting nor defines what is a so-called totalitarian party, it is seen as part of the Donald Trump administration's attempt to target China in the ongoing trade war. The notification published by the USCIS states that membership in or affiliation with the communist party or any other totalitarian party is inconsistent and incompatible with the naturalization oath of allegiance to the United States of America. This oath includes pledging to support and defend the constitution and laws of the United States. The notification is based on a Cold War era USCIS policy manual that specifically prevents members of communist parties. The law itself dates back to the first Red Scare era immigration policies that sought to actively hinder entry for radicals, especially communists and anarchists. The same policy manual was also used by administrations to bar people associated with anti-colonial movements in Africa and Asia from entering or naturalizing themselves as citizens of the country. A prominent example was that of South Africa's African National Congress which was deemed a terrorist organization until 2008. The ruling Republican Party of President Donald Trump has been pushing for measures to limit or altogether block means for Chinese nationals from entering the U.S. Previously, the Trump administration had discontinued a range of visas for Chinese nationals including ones that allowed foreign nationals to study and research in STEM that science, technology, engineering and medicine programs. In our next story, Bolivia's coup president Johnny Nanez has lifted restrictions on foreign non-governmental organizations from interfering in domestic intervening in domestic politics. This marks the reversal of the pro-sovereignty policy previously implemented by president Eva Morales who was overthrown in a coup last year. Morales has enacted the law in order to restrict NGOs particularly the usual influx of them from the United States from intervening in domestic politics. On Friday, Johnny Nanez presented a decree stating that Bolivia is going to open itself to the world to contact with western democracies and particularly those devoted to freedom or so she said. In the process which spanned years, NGOs played a pivotal role in the coup against Morales. Such groups were able to funnel financing to right-wing ground actors from the foreign exterior. Such groups also took aim at the AMA's government on false claims framed as human rights issues and notably during a series of fires in 2019. The silence of these same organizations to thousands of hectares burning under the AMA's regime has raised criticism from across sections of Bolivian society. Following the number 2019 coup, it was alleged that NGO backed operatives were using social justice language and progressive issues to subvert Bolivia's government and Morales reelection campaign. It is also revealed that many actors received direct or indirect funding from the US Department of State via the National Endowment for Democracy to operate and further neoliberal interests. The movement towards socialism leaders said that NGOs don't actually defend the indigenous movement of Mother Earth. Bolivia's post-coup elections are just two weeks away and it is expected that the regime will continue to push through numerous last-minute laws as it also works to, by any means necessary, prevent the AMA's from retaking power. And finally on Sunday, a young leader of the Communist Party of India, Marxist from the Trishur district in Kerala, was hacked to death by right-wing activists reportedly linked to the ruling Bharati Janata Party and allied Hindu nationalist organizations. The murdered activist Sanup Yu, who is 26 years old, was a branch secretary of the CPIM in the district. He was attacked along with three other young workers of the CPIM and the Democratic Youth Federation of India. The three others who were critically injured have been admitted to the hospital. So far, four activists of the BJP and its parent organization, the RSS and another fundamentalist organization, the Bajrang Dal, have been identified in connection with the brutal murderous Sanup. According to the police, all four of the identified accused have criminal backgrounds. Reportedly, the attack was carried out by a gang of eight members. The attackers reportedly targeted Sanup and others while they were returning after making arrangements for food, which the DYFI, that's the Democratic Youth Federation of India, distributes as a Trishur Medical College Hospital every day. In all medical colleges and district hospitals across the states, food kits are being distributed for poor patients and their bystanders by the DYFI, which is an organization of communist youth. Various local committees of the DYFI take turns each day and the members collect food packets from households that come under their area and these packets are being distributed at the hospitals. Despite the murder, State Secretary of the DYFI, A. A Rahim said that his comrades would ensure that the food packets are being distributed as planned. That's all we have time for today. We'll be back tomorrow with more news from across the world. Until then, keep watching People's Dispatch.


One of things is mentioned quite often on this channel is the name of it, the average golfer, and often people refer to it in relation to handicap, and that was never what the title was intended to mean. It was about the average golfer dilemmas that we face, the experiences that we have, how we enjoy the game, what we take from the game, that was the idea behind it, and today is one of those dilemmas in that I've had an issue which I've no doubt every other average golfer out there will have faced in their time, and that is quite simply, I'm driving the ball particularly poorly right now, and what do I blame? I blame the driver that's in my hand, or at least I start to question the driver that's in my hand, and we all know the like the odd is, it's far more to do with my swing than it is to do with the club, but it has got me asking questions, do I change the club, do I change my swing, or do I simply adjust the club? I'll have to find out and that's going to take a little bit of time, so I'm going to hit some balls, and I'll also explain why this bag behind me is really important, it's the, well it's the winning bag of US Open champion John Rahm, and you've got the chance to win it, and I'll explain how later on in this video, but first of all I need to hit some golf balls, and I'll explain this dilemma a bit more. Right so the dilemma starts here, I've got to first explain for those who don't watch the channel frequently, the driver I chose to use last July I think it was, so almost approaching a year now, was the Callaway big berth of B21, which I hated the look of, I hated the offset, I didn't think it would work, but for some unknown reason go back and watch the videos that I produced, because I produced a number of them, because I questioned it on multiple occasions on how in fact it was working for me, but it did, but the fact is I was always struggling with a huge amount of offset that was on the driver, and for me of late in the last month or so six weeks, and even the bad shots when I was struggling, or the bad shots that I hit even when I was playing well, I always had a sort of huge sort of closed face to the left, and it was just a straight dart in low bullet left, and I struggled with it, and in the last month or so it's happening more and more, and it's cost me heavily, so like I said you start to question the club in question, so what I'm going to do, I'm going to switch in to something fairly neutral in terms of head shape and setting, also have a little look at what's been going on my swing, and then perhaps see if I make some adjustments to the current driver, is it the shaft in the current driver, what has changed that's making me think of possibly swapping out drivers, when I know really I shouldn't do that. Now one of the first things to talk about is my swing, because well it's far from technically correct, it's probably a coach's nightmare if they took any kind of look at it, and to be fair enough people have passed comments on those videos, but I get the ball round in my own unique way, and I'm not, I don't have lessons, I'm not really overly keen on sort of, or I've not got the commitment or time to partaking lessons the way really should do if you were a serious golfer, so like I said that quick fix is blaming the club and I know that's not right, so I've been spending an hour here this morning eating some golf balls first of all, with this B21 driver, changing a few things hand to be fair, I started off pretty ropey to say the least as I've been playing, massive difference for me I've just moved my team position very well quite considerably actually from way off my front foot maybe it was just a little bit too far off that front foot and again that's one of these things where as an average golfer I love messing round and sort of trying to find out a fix and probably has nothing to do with it, but right now I seem to have moved that ball just a little bit back in my stance and things are working out, but there are still issues with this B21 driver, but again how many of you just come down to the driving range and mess around a little bit and isn't that part of the the love of the game itself trying to figure it out yourselves with the moment I kind of had the ball, hopefully we're picking that up on camera, maybe not I'll do another shot of that is the ball really off off what I thought was my front foot probably was a little bit in front of it and I've just moved that back what seems considerably and all of a sudden we've got the ball going quite straight that's really straight so that's probably inferior in that camera as well, but it's made a massive difference, but there are still issues with what is happening with this big bertha driver every now and again with that offset that I referred to so I'm going to switch up to another driver as I'm sure you would do right now in this position as an average golfer and as we like to fiddle and mess around I'm going to try the epic speed which is always the one that was in the back of my mind and I'm also going to go to that heavier shaft this was the other dilemma 45 grams of shaft in reg was never what should have been working for me it did it worked perfectly fine then but I think as the round progresses as I quicken up as I get a little bit excited as I try and hit that ball a little bit harder as we do as we start to loosen up that's when things are kicking in and that's when the reg shaft is maybe just backfiring on me so it's going to be a hazardous smoke 60 gram stiff shaft in an epic speed head and see what happens are there any major differences like quick interruption and a quick chat about this bag that you've probably seen in John Rahm's hands he was carrying his clubs to victory in the US Open just a few days ago we have that bag and the three head covers to give away courtesy of Callaway Golf but it's as a prize in the average golfers day on July 23rd out to be held at Conway Golf Club so we're giving away two places in that golf day all you need to do is comment down below I want to win in the comment section and at the end of this week we're making a draw two year we'll get the chance to play in that event and then you'll get the chance to win this bag which will probably be first prize but there's also some incredible things going on in terms of prizes for T times at Dundonal links T times at Presswick putters giving away drivers giving away the list is absolutely endless so irrelevant to whether you win the prize or not make sure you check out in the link below how you can enter that and if you're available on July 23rd you can get to Conway Golf Club then I suggest you do so but for the time being comments down below I want to win now of course it is not a head to head by any means and this is very much about a personal situation to me but a dilemma that many of us would face so the big deal right now is that an address all of a sudden it's like almost uh you know it's what I'm used to seeing it's a more natural teardrop kind of club head than rather than that elongated B21 there's not the offset anywhere near there's still a offset on it but nothing like what I'm looking at so I don't feel as though the clubhead is facing off to the left and I'm readjusting so straight away much more comfortable at address which is a bonus let's hit one with a camera and see where this thing goes it's a nice sweet sound out of the speed if anything just pull that one a little bit down the left that wasn't as good as the B218 on camera but massive massive differences and how much again is a psychology this game where people say you know about lessons and that's always the route you should go down if you've got that opportunity to do so but we're also looking for quick fixes and sometimes a quick fix quick fix can be mentally you buy many times you buy a new club it solves all the problems at least for a very short one is a short fix don't get me wrong but from a mental perspective confidence is higher you think differently when you're on the tee and again I think that's a major part of playing this game but I'm more interested in your comments throughout this video how do you address this kind of situation now as ever I like your input and as I explained on the interest of the video as an average golfer I'd normally have turned up into a pro shop grab a few drivers off the shelf maybe test a few and swapped out and I want to know how many of you have done that how many of you've done it recently what is your current thought process when you're struggling with the game of golf is it back to the coach and get some lessons or is it in fact like I say blame those clubs and buy something new and be honest with your answer right so what I then did was I went on to hit a number of shots with with each driver with my new ball position in terms of my stance and it did make an immediate impact I don't know whether technically correct but certainly I felt as though it was way too much off that front foot so just that minor adjustment in position made a massive difference so straight away you'd go then to say well in that case the lessons would have been the route to go down because if that was and is an issue then a PJ professional would have corrected that pretty much straight away let alone all the different technicalities and my swing that were incorrect just that ball position made a massive difference so the shots that you see me hitting now are with the b21 and if I'm honest with you I can hit a decent drive with the b21 there's no doubt about that and I've played really well with it for the last year so there's no reason why I should dismiss that straight away but what you will also see is that tendency to throw in that sort of low left and I did it twice three times in a group but we're not going to watch every shot I hit but I did it two and three times in a group of 10 12 shots and percentage wise that's really bad so for me when I hit a swing that is a sort of a bit of a fade which is my go to shot off the tee then the b21 sort of helps me as the round goes on I mentioned it earlier when I want to get a little bit quicker on there and a bit more confident maybe sort of playing well and I go after a few that's when the problem starts to occur I can't hit much to a right to left shot without overdoing it and that shaft then becomes really sort of unstable if you like and I start to throw in that low left and certainly gets a little bit all over the place and that's the only worry I've got if I was looking at these and then switched on over into the epic don't forget with that hazardous smoke shaft in 60 gram stiff much more like where I'd be used to hitting and if I'm honest with you it was a lot more stable is what I would say but stable at this point where I'm kind of warmed up and I'm hitting a lot of shots so it's that compromise between the two I've really enjoyed it so the 45 gram shaft regular in a b21 and it's a kind of very much an easy going if don't do it have to go after it too much it's uh if you're swinging nice and steady it's good but there are those tendencies for that low left so on a personal level I would certainly consider changing the shaft and looking into that in a bit more detail and certainly had addressed the more regular setup of the way that face sits with the epic speed was much more easy on my eye but much more like what I'm used to but I'm also wary of I just don't want to jump ship into another driver simply because of a couple of months six or eight weeks of bad driving so I will work that out on a personal level and decide what I want to do but the message of the video is always the same really I think that whatever you choose it doesn't matter it's each to their own this idea of an opinion um the only opinion that matters is yours is what I was trying to say and if you kind of decide that it's the lesson route that you want to go down absolutely fantastic if you decide you want to buy a new club then that's absolutely fine as well these people that criticize one routes or the other we're in no place to do it you just do what you like to do and what you get the enjoyment out of the game for and like I said there's no arm in buying new clubs if you can afford to do it and if that brings you a little bit of pleasure and also the fact that like I said from a mental perspective golf is massive and even if it increases confidence maybe only for a short period anyway but I'll let you decide on that but more importantly throughout this video I've said on a couple of occasions it's your opinions and when you've been faced with that same dilemma what you have done in this situation anyway that's me thank you for watching uh thumbs up comments down below and I'll catch you all very soon you put the lights on might me flow


But now an applause for Aya. Identifier now to design your next. I have a surprise for you. This presentation is not made by me. This presentation is made by you. Did you know that? My conference started yesterday. And those are you guys. That was the first day when I arrived and I was sitting there with an apple in the hand. I had no idea what to present today. Well, I know the topic, obviously, right? But I didn't know how to give this information to you. So I held this apple and I hoped that some magic will happen similar as with Isaac Newton or with the Steve Jobs or Ada Maneve or the Snow White who found her prints. And imagine or not that really happened. And I got an idea by looking to you. And I understood, okay, what am I trying to figure out? I'm trying to figure out my next, meaning this presentation. So I need to start with designing my now. So I used my own pill or my own medicine to do what I'm doing currently. And I will try to lead you through that and also show to you how that worked.  It's not made by me. I just try to somehow put it together and show another angle of that or how we were talking yesterday in our workshops adding my piece of puzzle to that. So piece of puzzle and me in now. So what was my now yesterday? I think the same as for all of you workshops. And it was amazing, wasn't it? And each of us the same as these lines, we went to different workshops and it was really hard to decide to which to go because we want to attend all of them and all of them impacted us. Somehow gave ideas and how we look at it. And workshops I attended impacted me directly and I actually couldn't imagine before that I could find all my answers to today's presentation in those workshops. So it started with Peter, thank you, with your workshop about research. And outcome for me in that workshop was that there is one very important variable in applied improvisation which kind of doesn't help with research but it is must have in order applied improved work and that's the person. And that's either the person who is running the workshop or one-on-one training and also the person who is participating and all the team who is participating. So every single thing that we are doing and every single workshop, even if we copy paste it all the time, it is different because of that variable. And that's a good news because this being different also although you are using the same methods it must have in this tool that I will present to you shortly. Second one to which I almost didn't go. I was passing by. I wanted to go to the other one which is next to that room and then that stopped me. And he said, well there is no one yet so are you interested to come here and join and we start to talk about what is there and when he said this phrase you know this feeling when you go to the business and they ask you what you do and you say oh I improvised and now I'm being terrier and they are answering, oh my god that's something I could never do. That clicked me. But that is exactly about the tool I will show to you today because although it can be used and advised to use for improvisers and I use it myself as well it is actually designed to use for persons who has never in their life played a single improv scene and maybe even haven't seen one. So that's exactly for that one and out of this workshop came out one more amazing thing afterwards. I was discussing everything that was in the workshop with I saw you somewhere here Per and I wrote down the sentence that you said that sentence is the highlight of this tool or combination of methods that I will give to you and now listen carefully that's the sentence of the conference I promise you. So the sentence is with applied improv we can add microphone into our brains and listen what's happening there. So that, thank you Per, that's exactly what person can do by himself all alone or in the group by using this tool that I will show to you. So then I went back to the place where I'm staying and I thought okay I have these ideas inside I need to put it together and then I remembered that I participated in one more workshop and that workshop kicked my ass because when I was looking at the list of the workshops that was something that I thought oh no I don't need to go to that one come on I know how to facilitate I don't want to do that in my country and you know all this stuff and then it's like oh wow stop there what an arrogance right you cannot know everything so every one of us has their shiny side and the dark side and this feeling was the first one which I got out of this happily that I really went there I loved all the information there and the method that I will give to you it actually opens both the bright side and the talents of yours and the dark side as well because in order to move into your next you need to know your now 100% including the dark side so thank you Jan for this workshop it really opened my dark side and I got a lot of good info which I wouldn't know if I wouldn't go there this is how you made all this so let me now show you what is that you made and that's me by the way in the improv scene being dragged showing us a little bit of associations that sometimes when we do not acknowledge where we are then we just let life drag us and that's not too good right this method I call it TIA it can be used both for solving small questions for example where will I have my birthday party or big ones what should be my next job what is my purpose in this life should I move from one city to other or even countries so you decide and based on what is your purpose you use this method so how do you use that T stands for talk and talking is the part with which you actually have a microphone in your head what you do you put on the recorder you put on a timer and you talk for 10 minutes and with every minute you need to add new action new information about this topic on which you want to decide and understand what's happening there now and what is important you add to this action also emotion you tell loudly how you feel when you do that or this is happening or where you're living there or that you're having that kind of lunch dinner and etc go to the details it's all good but every minute you need to add one more action one new thing first 3 or 4 minutes it will be predictable the minute 8, 9 and 10 will blow your mind promise I obviously stands for improvise however if you don't want to use this word I sometimes for people who are scared from this word I say daydream just daydream and then you play with that but before you need to listen what you were talking about and then write it out on the paper action, emotion, action, emotion action, emotion technically there should be at least 10 actions, emotions sometimes several emotions added to one action after you listen to that you pick one good and one dark one which you don't like which didn't have this positive or good emotion and then you play with it how do you play with it? with good one will you know how to make hero stories of super heroes, right? so you start with that you are talking about this good action that you do in your life regards this topic and you increase it increase it, increase it and make it your superpower like if you are answering to the questions in the job in the call center and you feel that this way you can help people so you increase this as your superpower that actually you hold the knowledge of the world on your shoulders and you can support every single person that you meet you have this power inside you so just talk about it make a crazy story and create this into your superpower the negative one you use the method which is called emotion swap or changing emotions and you start to tell the story actual, true about this action and negative emotion that comes out of it, like in my case arrogance and then continue telling this story loudly that's important part until you manage to swap that negative emotion and go into some positive situation and you never know what that will be right, that you can know only when you start to tell your story with the purpose to change the emotion that's the improvised part and the last one well we couldn't live without that right, we wouldn't be there without that it's a play so you go and try it out whenever you do this action with this positive emotion you remember that that's your superpower put it in your face you put it in your body and you just do it on the maximum and you do it like if this is a call center when I'm picking up the call then I'm okay, that's my superpower I can solve everything and I'm not answering in the way okay Taya, how can I help you but I am here how can I help you today so you do that with that importance in you that there is this superpower and that's it, just observe what happens what changes and then you can go to the next one as in my case I noticed that this happened okay I need to go there because that was my dark side, my arrogance I remember yesterday sitting there and wanting to take photo of the most important slide so this one is it here is everything said so I'm moving forward just to remind you as you saw those are just games, impro games but used in the purpose to design your next to identify your now designs your next but a little bit this part helps with small things next what I will show you helps with little bit more complicated things however it cannot skip this one designing your now so talk for 10 minutes recorded every minute action emotion and then write it down, listen, choose two ones, work on them, make a superhero story, change emotion in the bad one and then try to write it so this you're designing your now it means that you're technically knowing where you are and you're raising your leg in order to make your next step and in order to design your next you literally need to make a step and one step at a time and this method you use as follows so you know your now and you start working like this and your task is to make a one word at each step you cannot stop you cannot hesitate you need to continue this pace and you start with telling your now what you already know so start with I'm doing that I'm working there, I love this and then there is moment when I need to decide where I want to go what is that my next big question I'm searching and I keep walking in this pace and I'm talking one word at a step before I know and that's how again you get this recorder in your brain through the spontaneity and your body you're getting out the subconscious, that info that is already inside you and that is how you are designing your next so I thank you a lot for creating this presentation for inspiring from all in the past you can see me there reading the book do you recognize the book? it's by Alice Paulin Games for Lone Actors my favorite one which also inspired this one because you can do that on your own alone or using in coaching sessions one on one or even in the groups and thank you for letting me share that with you let's continue the journey


You mentioned to me during pregame doing those little things right particularly there in the fourth quarter What does you see as the biggest difference this game? Yeah, I think we we what you talked about as a group is the fouling component and so lately We've been pretty good of not fouling we knew coming into a game SGA is a guy who shoots double digits in free throws and ends up shooting 14. I think tonight two free throws for them in the first half and Not in the second half, you know 20 something free throws 24 in the second half And so big difference in the game. So that's that's discipline our ability to know personnel and our ability to execute Was there anything particular with the game plan that you saw that changed from the first half versus the second?  Is there any concern there with him? He'll be on the trip with us. So hopefully it's one game. I hope so Christian Okay, and and second just obviously this is to now in a row without Kevin and everybody's talking last season You know, you automatically think about what happened with him last year Is there any like I guess pressure when you look at last season and everything unfolded while he was out to not have the same result? No, I hope our group is in the now and you know, some of these dudes weren't even here last year And so we finished Miami game with the win without Kevin We go into a Boston game where we did some good things for three quarters and then again tonight half-time, you know, this is a good team that's beat a lot of good teams and Fourth quarter again where we don't come up with enough scoring I guess to Compliment the stops. So I think that's the challenge for us as a group to be able to sustain And so that is harder that is harder mentally and physically because Kevin does save you at times And give you a bucking and so now your defense is set And so that's the challenge or this group is they have to dig in and have a mental fortitude Greater than before because every possession does matter and that's what we talked about yesterday So that 50-50 ball that loose ball that file for free throws They do matter first quarter third quarter and obviously we're seeing in the fourth quarter Because Jack I mean do you see any parallels with the fourth quarter offensive struggles between this game and the Boston game? Oh, I don't know. I mean, you know looking back at the Boston game We got good shots, and I think if that is the common message, I think we all look tonight and We got some good shots whether there was open threes where there was offense a rebound I think we got good looks. We just needed him to go Then Seth really since that rally in Miami seems like he's really stepped up since Kevin's gone down Is what have you seen at him during this whole week really? Yeah, he's doing a little bit of everything I think having him Come off the bench to kind of steady that group to play along with Kai and just another playmaker have the ball in his hands So he garners a lot of attention because he can make shots And so I think he's done a great job of having balance of playing with and without the ball Jack is this been gonna have to get a MRI before you guys go to Texas Yeah, from what I told Nick no scheduled MRI that was the latest that I got from the guys


exceptions about how to balance the economy to make it work better for a wider degree of people I don't know what how to summarize that in one word but one word one of the others the one word answer I would say technology and all the discrepancies that is creating technology force for good or or or ill for good good for good we all grays good I would say you have to look at both sides of the coin yeah right agreed because technology is propelling globalization and we're talking about some of the negative aspects of the global vision too but think of the health aspect I mean technology can can alter health if you're thinking technology in countries where you're not having a medical how do you say this you know you're not not enough doctors available right you can use technology a lot and enable people we've seen that the village doctors and all these things so I think pre diagnostic of illnesses so I think technology in its good and it's not I don't think it's the economic side only I think it's the ability of technology if it's deployed for the good side that can do a lot of change I was struck by what Tim Cook said recently the CEO of Apple of course that he thinks Apple's future is in health so those watches that sort of measure your heartbeat so don't be shy please and introduce yourself I'm advocating for farmers from India and the poor's the developing world you're talking about globalization we're talking about WTO where does agriculture fit in because normally when you have trade disputes like between China and America you're talking about a trade deficits and things like that but when you look at agriculture you're talking about livelihoods and I would want to see that how how where where do we see in the next 10 20 years or how agriculture is going to be impacted with this globalization because millions and millions of people are impacted because of how WTO was signed and how it's got very grave implications in fact many farmers in the developing world actually chaired the US president when he said he's walking out of WTO who wants to address this Ricky you want to give it a try that's why I use the word rebalancing before is I think we're going to have a kind of a rebalancing of priorities in domestic policy but it'll affect trade as well and one of them is in this area you know for 10 years 10 15 years people try to get a very liberal approach to our cultural trade done in negotiations and that never succeeded and I do think that things have shifted and people recognize that we need to rebalance a bit and understand the livelihoods question that you're talking about and that we need to have a bit more of a flexible and hybrid approach to allow countries to maintain rural livelihoods while not you know unduly discriminating and shutting off their markets so we need to find a better balance in that regard you know in in the US I think something like 5% of the population of produce all the food for the people in China it used to be 20 30 years ago it used to be 95% producing for 100% today I think it's it's only about 15% and all of that is because of technology and all of that because of globalization so I think with globalization if it is allowed to flourish without without the pollution of politics and geopolitics and so on a lot of good things can happen in the agricultural sector as an example you know there are so many direct flights from Thailand to Israel and it is not without any reason it's all this agricultural technology and that's why Thailand has become you know it is a great this agricultural this country on the other hand I come from Indonesia they would not allow to have even one flight to Israel they would not even allow Indonesians to go to Israel so you you miss out I saw this I'm using extremes so I think the right kind of globalized globalization should allow benefits to flow through the agricultural sector yeah and the point is you know there are never ever any agreements which last forever in Bay are right forever so to us for a level playing field is not wrong the US as we want to have a level playing field in certain areas that's true but other countries should ask the same it's not you know the agreements are fitting to a certain purpose of course you know then we started the emerging countries in a should gain more China is not any longer emerging country should not be treated as an emerging country you know that that is changing and therefore we need a discussion about that how we rebalance certain things and that's a completely legitimate a question to raise you know I'm not saying you know all the agreements we did 20 years ago 15 years ago what is right forever the question right here in in front on the on the couch hi Alexander Stubb I'm the former Prime Minister of Finland currently with the European Investment Bank given that Matt did multiple choice question if you'd allow me go for two true or false hypothesis the first one is do you think that the notion of multilateral trade agreements alla WTO are dead and given that there is a clear power vacuum emerging with the withdrawal of the US from the trading nations the lead is going to be taken by the European Union through bilateral trade agreements so do you think the EU will be the trend setter and the regulator through bilateral trade agreements question number one question number two by necessity do you think that the next level of cooperation between the United States and the European Union is actually going to be in the realm of the digital revolution because of the way in which these two continents think about artificial intelligence and about privacy which is really the opposite way in which things I looked upon in China so my question is do you think that the EU and the US will forge a merger on digitalization against China and then the other one was and final point Matt you mentioned health Apple is a little bit out of it I'm wearing a Finnish ring called aura which actually measures all of my vital signs in real time and has a map that goes through my pulse right now it's quite low 46 so we're doing okay I'm not an Apple shareholders I just said this okay I like quizzes who wants to start eat you know why I have a clear preference that be a real reinvent WTO multilateral but if that doesn't work then it's better to do bilaterals instead of doing nothing so that would be my answer on the first subject of the second point was again yeah I think you know we have so much in common and the US and Europe and I think we should strive to have one alignment how we deal with data and how we protect privacy of individuals and you know just because we are on the short in some conflicts doesn't mean that we should not strive for getting a line on the long run let me say I think things started bilateral and it is expanded to multilateral but I think it's going to be combination while it seems that from the US and China there seems to be some breakdown but other discussions and negotiations continue not I think from a business perspective also we see that things before used to be so simple just bilateral it has become multilateral but it's a combination of all that so I would say that it will be a much more dynamic system on the second issue this on the technology digital side it's all coming to you know the the competitions on the 5G there's gonna there's gonna impact life it's gonna be impact the infrastructure for everything that happens over the next you know 2030 40 50 years and it the reality is it is starting to polarize with developing countries going maybe more you you and the US and then the developing countries into Huawei so I think it the reality is like slightly different way of asking you is the future clash between China and Europe slash the US a military clash a trade clash or a technological rules clash you should I don't just duck out this question either so this too I think I think there are elements of all that we're gonna see and that this is gonna be the art of of statesmanship to manage this will because we're so interdependent that to manage this in a clumsy way will be in everyone's will do harm to everyone but on the WTO question I think the WTO survival it depends on the WTO being able to embrace a more variable geometry than it's traditional everybody's got a sign on the dotted line right now the rules in the WTO are not very hospitable or groups of countries even large groups of countries to negotiate something as a forward group that then the rest of the organization can exceed to later on that that needs to change and then the second part is even in a more variable geometry world there's still a really crucial role for the WTO the multilateral system there are currently 400 preferential trade agreements usually regional trade agreements there are 3,000 plus investment treaties in the world it's such a maze of different rules that companies operating globally let alone small businesses that are trying to export into different markets have to navigate nobody but the WTO could do a better job than beginning to stitch together better coherence among this patchwork quilt and that's a future way for the WTO to renew and refresh its utility in the world last thing very quickly on the digital in the data EU US actually I think tomorrow we're gonna hear from the Japanese Prime Minister on his agenda for the G20 this year and I believe you will hear a significant new emphasis in this area so I don't I think the EU and the US can provide leadership but I suspect it will not only come from those two and I would I would look for a larger coalition moving maybe let by the Japanese we'll see maybe if you allow I would like to follow up on James if James hypothesis arrived that we get to four 5g networks I don't I don't know how we should run a global company any longer you know because one one Campbell say you have to operate on that network and the other one and then how we exchange information you know I you know I can't imagine if that really happens you know I don't know how we should ship any of the high-tech products from China to the US and vice versa with you know how should we manage the data you know it's the data center then in China different or do we have to bring everything and I you know and that is a real problem we have that already with data yeah more and more countries are demanding that the data is only kept in the respective countries and that is already a massive problem to manage you know we still deal with that but if that really if a technology is separated between two parts of the world I have no imagination currently how we should run the global business actually you take on the true or false challenge I think it's it's difficult to add because I agree the the WTO I think that would be the frame that that we would all wish sort of stepping up push back and outstub and and put you in the spot for a minute why do you think because you that's a true or false question about the US and the EU coming together but on current evidence there on antitrust and taxation on data privacy if anything they're diverging you're not you're now seeing the backlash to technology in the US that happened in Europe a lot earlier but why do you and that what I read to be the presumption of a question that there are destined to come together why are you so sure of that because on current evidence that doesn't seem so obvious to me just get the yeah the mic back here again I think the starting point is linked to a belief in the individual and in privacy if you look at the way in which people in Europe and even the United States reacted to the revelations on Cambridge Analytica and Facebook using the data if you look at a lot of the legislation norms and discussions that are right now linked to privacy in general both sides of the Atlantic they're actually pretty close to each other yes you're seeing a lot of competition policy being quite aggressive or antitrust is calling the US against some of the tech giants in the US but a lot of the tech giants are actually right now adapting themselves to the for instance general data protection directive and they're doing it not for Florence 19 Gale type of stuff they're doing it because of competition and necessity on the other side you have China which has a completely different approach I would argue to the individual and the notion of community and privacy I'm not saying it's wrong or right but it's very different what we're seeing now with some of the technological applications determining your social status whether it's through Alipay or others you would never ever see that in the United States or in Europe so by necessity and by default I think we will iron out some of the differences between the US and the EU and to a certain extent I'm simplifying gang up against the Chinese so at the end of the day it's going to be some of the US based tech giants from Facebook to Twitter to Amazon going against Tencent Alibaba and others and this will be the big sort of technological battle and I'm sure you will then see the Western world simplified going a little bit against China and but that's why I really liked your point on not having two different 5G networks because this could be a defining moment as well I'm of course exaggerating but this would be my case and for the same reason I think if the US and the EU gang up together it will be a very hard fight because you've got different set of values in terms of privacy and data and so on in China versus in the Western world. Final point on this you know I've wrote a Financial Times column a while back slightly provocatively for China Europe is the new Africa and my argument was that if you looked at a lot of the acquisitions by Chinese companies either known or unknown linked to for instance intellectual property and otherwise Europeans just let it go we didn't have a SIFI is dealing with this and now you're starting to see a lot of the regulators whether they're French or otherwise starting to say that hey you know Eggstron could have gone through the fingers this would not have been a very good thing so we're gonna start seeing European regulators getting a little bit more aggressive I think on this interesting enough yeah interesting sort of political turn and maybe it's a funny way that I think Europeans would never admit it but that's sort of the Trump's sort of China bearish policy has seems to be rubbing off on Europe but putting you Frank on the spot you'd say in that if the future with 5G that's China would be a separate entity and would be opting out of globalization arguably or making it difficult but aren't we in digital terms already there I mean China has its own digital ecosystem it's got its own champions mostly American giants can't really do business there isn't it already there in a way but that that's different because that's so far more consumer business anyway and they you know that we have it in many and retail if you look into the classical retail you know there are many different companies around the world as well the point is if you really start connecting the dots what how you deal with data and how you deal with information exchange and I think we need a new agreement globally with an umbrella in every country has its own right to interpret what is an additional applicable in the respective country you know because we have not everywhere the same government rules and that's the decision of these citizens of a respective country so we need to find an agreement you know how we deal with that exchange in an environment that we have different governments it's reality and you know we have no right to say as Western everything has to be a democracy that's you know we can't do that we can strive for that we defend our democracy as Western countries and we should that's the reason why the US should be very well aligned with Europe but we can't rule the world somehow with that so we need an idea how we align with different systems that we can still work together should we bring digital into the conversation about trade more aggressively in a sense I mean and bringing kind of that we will need a set of or presumably you will need a set of common lowest common denominator perhaps but some common digital rules to make it and WTO might be a place I don't know how realistic that is you know how how how would that look even yeah so there's 72 countries now that have agreed to begin discussing e-commerce in the WTO we don't know where that's gonna head but it's an important step forward the trick with the e-commerce is that there are a lot of enabling environment issues that are not likely to be something you can have a harmonized global treaty about they're more about you know digital payment systems or digital documentation or logistics facilitating logistics or a range of things where it's where you really need a public-private dialogue and you need some best practice frameworks but probably the WTO will handle the principles part of it kind of a basic level of trade principles if you will that's one part of it the second part is what you just mentioned on the data side it seems to me I completely agree with your framework China has a big interest because it is not simply those large companies are not selling them but simply domestically they are global firms and they have keen equities and large equities and expanding internationally just as Western firms have a big interest in maintaining and expanding production in China so there's a built-in I think common interest in coming up with a kind of framework that you just talked about which is can we define certain classes of data which ought to be allowed universally to move because they're commercial they're non-personal or they're anonymized personal data that enables big data services that benefit society and then as you suggest presumably there will be areas of policy that will differ by country because of their different cultural norms or different policy preferences that you have to allow for that kind of flexibility but coming to at least that type of a two-tier or maybe more than two-tier arrangement of identifying a common set of different classes of data that can allow the world economy to be interoperable and operate increasingly as digital plays more of a role in data underlies much of the value chain that activity that's going that's essential and I think that's as you suggest it's got to be a high priority for for the way we think about globalization and trade policy going forward anyone want to weigh in on this digital point or or something related to it okay I want to in the time remaining and a few minutes we have left one thing I was struck that you my my little quiz question on which force is really going to change the world let me mention kind of climate change that you hear about all the time and and the curiousness here here's why why how should we be thinking about kind of climate and the future of the world certainly but even the future of sort of globalization it has impacts on migration flows it is shifting where we're gonna get our resources it's certainly shifting what kind of resources we will consume so this is more of a it's not a one word answer I wonder if it's someone would want to tackle this one you may or may I start so so I think the Paris agreement was a breakthrough everything for the world you know now the job is somehow to execute that and business have to do their own job we have committed ourselves two years ago to really be carbon-free not carbon neutral carbon-free by 2050 despite that we are flying a lot of airplanes we are generating now the demand we have our own electric vans developed which are already 9,000 on this on the street so I think that's not a fundamental problem I'm from education a chemist so carbon dioxide and water is the base for you know or any nature you know plans are doing that on a big scale every day on a mega scale so you can reverse that problem if you find the right technology and I'm very optimistic that we will find right technology to cope with that problem the problem is more the short end what happens to islands what happens to coast areas what happens to changes in climate short-term the fundamental I believe I have is that this is fixable because the plants are doing that on mega scale scale every day with carbon dioxide and water so that is not an unsolvable problem it needs commitment from the governments which we have not needs commitments from the business to generate demand and then you'll find the right technologies to sort it if there's no way I mean I think you put your finger on a really important new phase of global economic integration and policy the Paris agreement in order for it to succeed we have to think beyond it and build upon it as the Paris agreement basically says countries set your targets and let's measure in and talk about them and but what the action has to happen in the economy and you don't need a multilateral agreement to try to tackle emissions reductions where they are most important in the most important countries in the most important industrial sectors and the new way this is where trade comes in a new kind of trade alliance would identify clusters of key firms and key sectors that emit that agree to remove the competitive disadvantage argument by agreeing on certain common standards or approaches going forward and if that's done you begin to have sort of a sectoral build-out of a trade understandings in in the areas that matter and then secondly you know we have all sorts of trade agreements regionally why why why shouldn't we have a plural lateral in other words a subset of countries a link their procurement their financial system disclosure in respect of climate change their tariffs lower tariffs for green products their their standards for what they consider energy efficient equipment what they want to do on on subsidies this could form a new type of non-regionally specific kind of trade alliance trade it trade an economic cooperation alliance that would be a big way to advance progress on climate change but it's a new way of thinking about trading globalization going forward great well this is actually I think we've answered all the questions in even a little bit under one hour and we know what what to do now so thank you so much to to this panel and thank you to you all and have a good evening