ʻUrmaa duskau nei zi'i kāteik iniu rāngkotei iniu tales. ʻUrmaa duskau ʻe maa maa luntutʃik, ʻewi tʰitutʃik, ʻa'ja kātuskātahkik ʻaimihtigau. ʻEgo ni ko oge Education Ministry ʻe one maa wistaa ʻe buta ʻi bezii duskahkik ʻe ohtahu maa ʻaimihtigau ʻgi kewtawa sage wa nīgi ʻkumau ʻnata tēnok. No more two-handerer's little kick. He didn't make it that far. No more seven-handerer's little kick. He was so good. He was really nice. He was really good. He was very kind. He was very good. He did his own kick. Back when I thought of him, he did a great kick. He gained some experience. I have spoken to my mother in law. She told me not to speak to her, but to have a conversation with my mother. I have spoken to her in law. My mother told me not to speak to her, but to have a conversation with her. It was a very difficult time for me. When I was a child, my mother would not be able to speak English. My mother would not be able to speak English at all. But I thought that if I could speak English, I would be able to speak English. For instance, I would not be able to speak English at all. But if I could speak English at all, I could speak English at all because it would be difficult if I would have to speak English in English at all. Manan, Kapi Beekswetchi, Kapi Atutahik, Tanjumakaas, Pejinaue, Hepe Ispaik, Eutauhtse, Kutagauiage, Koeuta, Entomihit, Kapi Aenihti, Getpe Vanamma, Kehteia, Kaita, Atsumon, Ewaamape, Maamskotam, Umakaitamaan, Taapskot, Atsumona, Uichihitun, Ewaama, Hepe Aemihta, Amihti, Kehteia, Atsumon, Kaaki, Atsumon, Eutauhtse, Kutagauiage, Amihti, Kehteia, Koeuta, Amihti, Kehteia, Atsumon, Kehteia, Atsumon, Kehteia, Koeuta, Atsumon, Atsumon, Kehteia, Atsumon, Kehteia, As visibility standards are also high. It's second best to know the fundamentals of beholding the Prophet. This is what Steward Calypso said Hepe Aami,iors explanation Right from old Hepe Aami, I'm sure the Prophet will travel My name is Thander, and as in you, we will take the moon. The legend of Cargizhu, and as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. And as in you, we will take the moon. when we have to go to the military service, we have to come to the military service in order to do the work for the people in the United States. Not even a thousand years ago, I went to the hospital for a thousand years. Then I went to the hospital with my husband, and he was very happy. He asked me if I could go in with him, and he said no. But at the hospital, I went to see him. And he told me that I was going to go to the hospital. Vinaidas, Pittaikas, no matou gan, kun huviteka huhtne, ksino matou, maga tsiru ni hiikiou. Ego miina giji, Avan jo. Ego miina vatano huitemi, keute ka huhtne miine vama.  Exkonoma as tuun isama antone ihtama. Kuui te ekskonoma asua, eprusheni ei se huapahtamaan ekskonoma akevan. Maatsvahn moi ka ki stohtenano science. Kis binei gai as ki ke tohte. Na moio van stohtenano eprusheni ja he volm, eis huavahtaman. Nia eisip네요sele mua. Esma eghi me taatta eski. I have every country in my nation that has been founded for me. I have been to the United States and to the United States. I have been to America. I am an Indian. I can speak to any language language language. I can teach any language language language language. I have been to other programs. And I also have the opportunity to talk We can't stay at home anymore. They need to sleep now. I don't feel well. If I stay in bed, I cannot rest. But I have to take care of this. If I stay here, I can't sleep. If I stay at home, I don't feel well. What resources will we need to improve your program? What resources will we need to improve your program? What resources will we need to improve your program? What resources will we need to improve your program? What resources will we need to improve your program? What resources will we need to improve your program? What resources will we need to improve your program?


Hello everyone, today we will be discussing about application protocols used in IoT. Here is the learning outcome, by the end of this session, students will be able to relate a given protocol with a specific IoT application. Here is the outline, first we will be discussing about why we need protocols and what are exactly IoT protocols and then we will be going through where these IoT application protocols exactly lie in the IoT protocol stack and then we will be getting through an example and then we will be going through an example where we will discuss how MQ2T works with respect to a simple temperature based IoT application. So before proceeding ahead I would like students to pause the video for a while and think on where exactly the IoT protocols lie and why do exactly we need IoT application protocols. So if you could refer the previous video and IoT protocol stack you can easily be able to identify this. So as we talk about an IoT application protocols, the things will be more clear and the answer exactly lies. For the question why do we need IoT protocols, the answer to this lies in overcoming a challenge that we usually come across whenever we are building an IoT project or application. So the basic challenges here are device-to-device communication on a local network or device-to-device communication over internet or device-to-server communication which is situated somewhere in the cloud and server-to-server communication over internet for storing the sensor data. And this challenge is generally resolved by protocols like MQ2T and COAP which stands for message queuing telemetry transport and constrained application protocols founded on TCP and UDP. Where do these protocols exactly stand in the protocol stack? This is a very important topic to understand. So as you can see you can think on this for a while again by pausing the video and the answer is very much clear as soon as you get this protocol stack in front of you. So as you can see we have application protocols and we are most often interested in today's session about these two protocols that is COAP and MQ2T. So these are generally built on UDP and TCP. So as you can see MQ2T is built upon TCP which is a connection oriented protocol whereas UDP is a datagram based or a connection less protocol and hence COAP will be a connection less protocol as well whenever we are utilizing them in our application. So what is more important in this overall TCP IP stack is we are interested in the application protocol. So we are interested in the application layer protocols which are COAP and MQ2T. So exactly how these applications come into picture and how they act in a given IoT application can be easily understood by looking into a couple of examples of IoT. So what are standard protocols in IoT? So the standard protocols in IoT are basically two which are MQ2T and COAP. These are open standards and they are better suited for constrained environments. Like maybe imagine like we have a small microcontroller whose RAM is very less and we can't bear any sort of resources where we need a very high RAM like processing computing and all the things because more often in an IoT application we have because more often in IoT based applications we have sensors which are directly connected to either a small microcontroller or we often have sensors which can be programmed directly. Having said that we have small sensors or microcontrollers it's a proven thing that wherever you have microcontrollers they often have very less amount of RAM available for processing and that is the reason why most of the sensors actually sense the data and they do a small scale processing like maybe sampling or some sort of frequent analysis and then that is directly pumped on to the gateway and then the data is pushed directly to the servers where the analytical modeling or prediction and other types of things are handled by the server. So the entire CPU intensive jobs are based on the servers or the clouds. So having said that again we need to remember always that most of the IoT applications where sensors are enrolled the only job of sensor is to sense the data and by using some hardware protocol directly transfer them to the controllers internal memory space or maybe the internal RAM and we can't rely on these microcontroller RAMs for CPU intensive jobs. So that's the reason why these kind of protocols like MQT and CUIP becomes handy so that we can directly transfer the given data or the sensor data to the servers. They also provide a mechanism for asynchronous communication as well as they can run on IP. We will discuss this in detail. So as an outcome so as a take away of this small discussion so as a take away of this small discussion we can conclude like we can conclude the things like MQT gives flexibility in communication patterns and acts purely as a pipe for binary data whereas CUIP is designed for interoperability with web it is similar to HTTP. Now let us discuss a little bit more about an MQT protocol. So what is MQT? MQT is basically a public subscribed based messaging protocol that is used for transferring data by means of a lightweight or M2M communication. So let us imagine about a condition where we have a central broker generally if we are aware of things like server and client where a client tries to access the servers data and that is how we generally refer the server as a web server. So imagine a small condition so now let us go through a small example of how so now let us simply go through example of how an MQT works in a given IoT application. So as we are already aware that this is a published subscribed based messaging protocol so definitely we need to have some server and a client. So imagine we have a central server which we refer as broker in terms of IoT language especially whenever we are dealing with MQT protocol we need to call the central gateway or the server as a broker. Next imagine we have three clients called Client A, Client B and Client C as shown on the screen and Client A for example is having some temperature sensors connected throughout its own organization or an application. So imagine that Client A has a couple of temperature sensors connected through a micro controller and it wants the sensitive temperature data to be pumped directly to an internet gateway and it wants to broadcast the given temperature to maybe some other clients like Client B and Client C. So with this scenario imagine that you have Client A which is trying to sense the temperature and as shown on the screen it is trying to simply sense the data and directly publish that particular data to the broker. So as you can see here the sensitive temperature is actually sent to the broker so this particular process of a given client transferring a given data towards the broker is known as publishing the data in terms of the IoT and MQT perspective. Next broker is going to get all this data and it is going to transfer the data further to these two clients called Client B and Client C. So the process of broker transferring the data being published by another client in the given network to other clients is known as publishing the data from broker towards the clients. So this is how we exactly talk about whenever we are talking about some other sensitivities. So imagine that we have Client A, Client B and Client C. Now for instance if Client A has temperature sensor connected to it and it wants to publish the data that it has sensed to the remaining two clients called Client B and Client C. So in this case we are going to allow Client A to publish the data. So Client A has currently published the data to the broker and now the broker is having all the sorts of data that Client A has actually sensed in terms of the temperature and now the job of broker is to publish the data further to Client B and Client C and this is how it is done. So do note the arrow directions here. So this is how Client A has actually transferred the data to the broker and broker is now responsible for transferring the data to Client C as well as Client B. Now in this scenario there are two important things to be noted that is whenever a particular client wants to talk with another client like for example Client A wants to talk with Client C and Client A wants to talk with Client B it is not directly possible. The things need to happen only through the broker. So this is how the things generally happen in terms of the impurity. So with this given example it can be very easily identified that wherever you have, so wherever you have a client server based of a logic similar to the example on the screen we need to definitely have the broker working efficiently in between. Now another advantage of using impurity is that only those clients which have actually subscribed to a given specific topic will be getting the data. So this is a new case where we are having four clients Client A, B, C and D as you can see on the screen. So here Client D is a non-subscriber. So do note that Client D is a non-subscriber. So whenever we say it is a non-subscriber what do we exactly mean? So we mean that the data that Client A has sensed and it is trying to publish will only be transferred to the clients which are subscribers which I have underlined that is Client C and Client B whereas Client D is a non-subscriber and that's the reason why there is no data transmission from the broker of the temperature towards Client D. So this is how impurity generally works. So the important points that you need to note whenever you are talking about impurity is we need to identify the topic and then we need to identify the message which needs to be transferred and then we need to identify the subscribers without which it will be very difficult to identify whether the sensor data will be broadcasted or whether is there anyone available to listen or not. So the things will be more clear further if we implement these things clearly in our upcoming videos. Further we have a constraint application protocol which is very much similar to the functionality of a UDP and most oftenly this is a document transfer protocol. The reason why this is known as a document transfer protocol is again this follows the server client model and the packet size is very much very tiny and the packet size involved in COIP is very tiny and that's the reason why most of the IoT based applications wherever we want a one-to-one communication between server and client which involve very tiny microcontrollers which less amount of RAM are utilized. So COIP comes handy whenever you have less resources in terms of RAM and you want a direct one-to-one communication which is also connectionless. Here are the references used for the video. Thank you.


But, Mr. President, I would like to present you to an outstanding audience and to the audience I'd like to present to you our greatest American, Ronald Reagan. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. And, Bob, as one small town boy to another Los Angeles, I vote in Santa Inés. But Senator Majority Leader and Mrs. Secretary of Transportation Dole, I manage that one, Republican Leader Michael, and Senators and members of the House, and ladies and gentlemen, having been in the mashed potato circuit in an earlier life, I know the danger of before-dinner speeches. Of course, there are pitfalls for every speaker. You know, there was a young minister, and one day he was asking for a little sympathy from an older, more experienced minister, when he said that some of those hot summer Sundays, he would look out while he was preaching his sermon, and the congregation would seem to be dozing off. And the older preacher said, well, I know I've had that experience, but he said I found an answer to it.  And he said, that'll wake him up. And then he says, you say to them, and that woman was my dear mother. Well, time went by, and sure enough, there was a Sunday, and the young preacher was going at it, but they were beginning to doze off, and the kids were writing notes to each other, and some of the women were knitting, but mainly they were dozing off.  And suddenly he was facing all those staring eyes, and everyone was awake. And he tried to continue, and he said, and that woman, I forget who she was. Well, it's a pleasure to be with you this evening. Bob Dole and Bob Nichol have been food champions of freedom and opportunity in the United States Congress, and I just hope we can bring to Congress more men and women just like them. We're preparing ourselves for an historic election. In November, the American people will determine the membership of the 100th Congress of the United States, and I want to thank each of you for what you're doing to ensure that the 100th Congress is filled with the kind of dedicated and right-thinking individuals who will keep our country strong, prosperous, and at peace. The battle we face is particularly vital, as you've been told in regard to the United States Senate. I have no intent, hesitation in stating that little of what we've accomplished in these last five years could have been done without Republican control of the United States Senate. It can't, and if you want to try, and one day maybe we can get to it, you might also figure that Bob Michael should be the speaker, not just the minority leader of the House. It can't be forgotten that after four years of total Democrat control of the federal government, both Houses of Congress, the executive branch, and all the departments and agencies, our people were suffering. Inflation, murderous interest rates, economic decline, and national uncertainty were the order of the day. The people who created the mess still cannot bring themselves to admit that the culprit that wrecked such havoc and hardship on our people was their very own policies. I think America's spectacular rebound underscores that our country wasn't suffering from tired blood in the late 1970s. It was suffering from tired ideas, wrong ideas. The Liberals attribute all the success we've had in the last five years to luck, global trends, and the celestial effects of Halle's Comet. Anything and everything except the real source of our progress. The reason things have turned around is that we have come at the problems facing America with a fundamentally different philosophy than what preceded us. Liberals called on government to play an ever-increasing role in the lives of our people. They relied on central planning, regulations, and bureaucracy. Is there any doubt about why our country in the late 1970s seemed to be humming along with all the efficiency of a Bulgarian shoe factory? If central planning were the way to a better world, we'd be importing our grain from the Soviet Union and not the other way around. There's a story, incidentally, about a May Day parade in Moscow. First came the tanks, and then the armored personnel carriers and the artillery and the missiles, and then the marching troops with fixed bayonets. And finally at the end, a black sedan with red flags flying and filled with men in gray suits. And a visitor from our part of the world who was there for the occasion asked a local citizen, what is that? And the fellow said, that's our most lethal weapon. They're socialist economists. Not well by trusting in the people rather than government planners, by leaving resources in their hands instead of taking them away, we unleashed the most powerful and creative force on this planet, the American free enterprise system. Instead of giving government more power, we asked the people to accept more responsibility. Our reforms and tax rate reductions kicked off what is now 39 straight months of economic growth. The glitch in last month's unemployment figures not withstanding. More jobs have been created than in any industrialized nation or than all of our trading partners in Europe put together. More than 9 million, as a matter of fact, almost 10 million new jobs since the recovery began. And today there are more Americans employed than ever before. I should say a higher percentage of Americans, of the total population employed than in the entire history of this nation. And more progress can be expected on this front as the economy picks up in the months ahead. The vitality of our small business spurred on by proliferation of computer technology is giving a new dimension to the words innovation and enterprise. Confounding the so-called experts at the same time growth has been high, innovation has remained at its lowest level in 25 years. And with interest rates edging down and the stock market shooting up, there is every reason for unbridled optimism about the future. And tonight I want to express my deep appreciation to Senator Dole for the indispensable role that he has played in all of this. His leadership in the Senate, his strong hand and his responsible voice have made a difference. He's forged a tough working alliance between the Senate and the executive branch. And, Bob, from the heart, I thank you. With Graham Rudman Hollings before us, there's much to be done in the weeks ahead. Now, I know that the gloom and doomers have been claiming that meeting the deficit reduction targets will require us to do everything but close down the federal government. Bob, you know, how bad have we left it up to the people in Kansas? They might just go for that. Seriously though, I'm confident that with responsible trimming and Bob's leadership, we can reach the deficit reduction targets. Graham Rudman Hollings gives us the opportunity to cut through politics. It opens the way for some much needed structural change, fundamental reform that will prevent future generations from being put behind the same deficit spending eight-ball as we are today. As we work together to meet the Graham Rudman Hollings targets, let's complement our effort with the passage of Senate Joint Resolution 225, the balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. The American people know what it means to live within a family budget. They don't spend their hard earned salaries on things that aren't absolutely necessary. When a balanced budget amendment would force Congress to be no less diligent with the people's money, experience suggests that government needs to operate within well-defined limits. The original purpose of our Constitution was not to give government power but to protect liberty by limiting the power of government. I've read a great many of the constitutions of other countries, other democracies, and also the Constitution of the Soviet Union. I found many things that are in our own. They don't observe it, of course, but they're in there. But where lies the difference in these constitutions? I've taken great pleasure in telling this to student audiences. All those other constitutions say we the government allow you the people, the following privileges, and so forth. Ours says we the people allow the government, the following powers, and they have no other powers than those that are listed here given to them by our permission. And in protecting the people, Thomas Jefferson once suggested that one thing left out of the Constitution was a provision to limit the federal government's power to borrow. Well, it's about time we got around to following Jefferson's suggestion. I look forward to the day when I can run down there to that monument and see if that statue is smiling. The power to spend and the power to tax, of course, go hand in hand. Senator Hatch is proposing an amendment to Senate Joint Resolution 225, which would require a full constitutional majority from the Senate and the House, not just those present from the total number for the passage of any tax increase. And I'm certain Thomas Jefferson would like that one as well. What we're doing is laying the foundation for the country that our children will inherit. One crucial decision we must make in the days ahead concerns what we're willing to do to counter a real and growing threat to our South. As President of the United States, the security of our country is, by law, my paramount responsibility. Congress, however, is no less duty bound to America's safety. All of us in the debate over how to counter the Communist drive in Central America will be held accountable if, because of an inability to act, our country is put into jeopardy. During his many years in the Senate, Bob Dole has supported those commitments necessary for the security of our country. He's been a stalwart supporter of the freedom fighters because he knows that helping them is not only the right thing to do, it is critical to the safety of our country. We never want to ask who lost Central America. We must work together, all of us in both parties, to see that it never happens. Ladies and gentlemen, we live in exciting times. As you know, that's a Chinese curse. Well, we need not look at it that way. For free men and women, for Americans, there will always be exciting times because the future is in our hands. People all over the world look to us. The future generations of Americans depend on us. This is not a burden. This is a challenge. And I think we have every reason to be confident. In these last few years, we've recaptured that spirit of enterprise and love of liberty at the heart of what it means to be an American and against which no tyranny will ever prevail. So you just make sure that in the days ahead, the gentleman here in the platform tonight remains the majority leader of the Senate. Thank you all. God bless you. Thank you.


Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister. I am a federal correctional officer, and I'm very proud of working in the public service as are a lot of people in this city as I'm sure But with all due respect the Phoenix debacle has gone on too long It's not fair We're being told that it could take up to three years to fix this problem and no offense. That's not acceptable It's not if a private corporation was doing this on the scale that this is happening The government would have taken action by now. This is just not right, and I'm asking you here today Is it possible here and now for you to say? Can we just put Phoenix aside put back the old system for now until we can get this working because there's tens of thousands of people That are sitting there. Oh tens of thousands of dollars. There are families that are losing their homes over this Listen, thank you. Thank you very much that question. I know I Let me say I entirely agree with you. It is absolutely unacceptable that this has happened Anyone but particularly public servants who are not getting paid what they are owed in a responsible and rapid way Is is unacceptable and it's not the way we want to function as a government and the question you had Can we just go back to the old system is the question that I actually had early on? The problem is there was no old system There was nothing but an a very ad hoc way of proceeding on things that was Scattered around through the massive bureaucracies of the federal government and the Phoenix system was brought forward as a way of actually Responding in a better way to something that was extremely uneven across the country There were problems around the actual transition There were people laid off too early in the process that weren't able to train up going through and I'll admit it this government In everything we were doing in the first months Didn't pay proper attention to the real card didn't pay enough attention To the challenges and to the the warning signs that were coming on the transition that we were overseeing We are working extremely hard to try and fix this we're down to 8,000 cases that are still 8,000 cases too many There are continued to be people who are who are suffering and we are Highlighting how important it is to do it and I can if I can give a brief shout-out mark Garrett's and has been one of the voices in our caucus because of all of you putting Putting your faith in him and your trust in him to step forward and keep pushing us to to get the situation solved And we're going to continue to work very hard on it and we will make sure that we settle this challenge Thank you very much for question


The screen of your television right here, the wheelchair that she once sat in is no more. You can see her walking freely for the glory of God. Ba-ba! Come all the way from Baltimore, Maryland. So you mean to say you were on a wheelchair for six months. You came all the way from Baltimore, Maryland just to be in this service today. Yes. Julia, we understand that you were in a car accident back in November of last year that put you into a wheelchair. We want to hear and understand just a little bit more so that we can really understand where you were coming from. What was the problems that you were having after you got into that car accident and you were laying in that hospital bed? What continued to go on from there? After that, I wasn't able to feel in my whole body. I wasn't able to move. My jaw was completely locked. I couldn't eat food at the time and they were trying to put it like a G tube in my stomach. But my family said no because God is going to work miracles. Amen and we want to know you said that you came from Baltimore, Maryland but where did the car accident take place? The car accident took place in Nebraska. So you mean to say that after you had gotten to that car accident the doctors now said that you needed to go to Maryland where the rest of your family was for your continued treatment? Yes. And what kind of things did the doctors want you to do and how were you responding in your body? They wanted me to do physical therapy. They wanted to do more testing to try to see if, you know, I can get better. And did any of that work for you? No, God worked for me. Amen. Let's put our hands together for Jesus.  We didn't get to see it too well in this video here but I want to tell you right now my personal contact with Julia before she received her healing. On Friday before the conference started I had the privilege to meet Julia and she was pushed into our screening section where we meet with people to talk to them about why they're here to receive prayer to give them encouragement and get them ready for the service and her family pushed her in on the wheelchair and she was completely paralyzed from the neck down and what I mean by paralyzed she couldn't move her body and I'm an eyewitness to this. Her body was stiff and she was barely talking and you could see that she was in pain and couldn't feel herself. Her family was very, very distraught about the situation that she was in. Myself, when I saw this young woman, I've seen people get out of wheelchairs before but for different kinds of reasons but I had never in my life seen a paralyzed person walk up out of a wheelchair so my faith was a little bit shaken. When I saw Julia and I've told her this already I thought, God, please help this girl because I've never seen this before and I'm confused. Can you do this Lord? And as she was being prayed for, I was saying, God, please help her, please help her, please help her and my faith to be honest people of God, it was quite low but I said, Lord, if you can do it, then you truly are an awesome God. Little did I know, I didn't even, after she received her prayer, I didn't see what happened next. Sunday morning, I walk into this church and one of the brothers comes up to me and says, did you see Julia? What do you mean did I see Julia?  There's no way that this is true. This is not happening. I had to walk over and see for myself as I stood right here and there's Julia standing for the glory of God and walking and moving and praising the Lord. Amen. Just to give you a little backstory of how that happened. Now you guys heard a little bit from the video about what caused her to get into a wheelchair and Julia, I just want you to reiterate for us a little bit. How did you end up in that wheelchair back in November of 2017? On November 27th, I was involved in a car accident and after the car accident, I was paralyzed from my neck down. I was unable to move. I was unable to go to the bathroom. I was wearing diapers. My siblings had to take care of me. They had to purate my food to feed me because my jaw was completely locked. So when you say that they had to purate your food and everything like that, you mentioned before in times past that they wanted to put a feeding tube in your body. Yeah, the doctors, they were saying that I wasn't going to get enough nutrients and I needed a G tube because what I was taking in just wasn't enough. It wasn't like, you know, meats and proteins, but my family said, no, they just kept on praying and we kept on praying and we were believing in God for a miracle. And so for those months that you were suffering with this pain, what was the doctor's diagnosis for you? What was their end result and how you would end up after this accident? They thought they said that they have nothing else to do. They thought that this is just it. That I would just stay that way forever. And Julia, what inspired you and your family to come all this way to Tri-Cities, Washington from Baltimore, Maryland? We were ready for a healing. We're ready for God's power. We were ready. And so when you came to this conference, just to give people in this crowd a bit of faith, what was going through your mind? What was in your heart and what were you praying and asking God for as you were in this place? I was just reminding God like his word. I just kept replaying it in my head.  It's his and he already won. I just kept reminding him. Hallelujah. Now, Julia, just so that people really can understand the depth and the gravity of what you went through. I want you to tell people how old you are.  Can you imagine at 17 years old getting to a car accident and going paralyzed and the diagnosis from the doctors that you would be paralyzed for the rest of your life. But I'm so grateful and I'm so thankful that Julia chose not to believe the report of this world, but that she chose to believe the report of the Lord. Hallelujah. So Julia, I'm going to ask you to do a little something bold here. Can you just demonstrate for the people in the crowd what you can do now that you were not able to do before?  Let's give it up for Jesus. Think Jesus Christ deserves a little bit more. She was lame and now she can walk. Her body was paralyzed. Thank you, Jesus. I want to tell you tonight that if God can do it for this young girl, Julia, paralyzed for six months due to an accident that wasn't even her fault, can you imagine what the devil had in mind for this young girl? But God said, nope, not my girl, not her, not today, not now and not for her future. And I promise you right now that God has the same report for you. Amen. Amen.  My life has been amazing. God has just been revealing himself in so many different ways. I'm just, I'm able to do everything. I'm able to go to school. I'm able to work. I'm able to sing again. I can just do everything. God is just amazing. Hallelujah. Thank you, Jesus. Julia, what is your advice for people who have come here tonight to receive a touch from God? What can you tell them to encourage their faith and encourage them in receiving from God today? I would say come expecting, increase your faith. When you come, come, come to God, you know. Don't even, don't even pay attention to anything else. Just keep it between you and God. Just look to God and tell God exactly what you need. And I promise you, He will meet you where you are. He will meet you exactly where you are. Whatever it is that you're needing for, because that's His word, that's His promise to us. Amen, amen, amen, and amen. Hallelujah. Thank you so much, Julia, for sharing with us today. We're so happy to have you with us to encourage people's faith. Thank you for watching this content. I hope this was a blessing to you. If you're like me and you like to click on things, click on this, subscribe to our channel, and the content will come to you every time we post it. And remember, the best is yet to come.


I wasn't still I mean just randomly got me out. Yeah, I had dark schism Empowered penance with Trinny I think it's for Trinny. How about we're really looking a lot Chris Go on to them.  I slowed him Yeah Going hard and I don't see me. It's yes me really hard to get to you that I'm trying Yeah, I'm gonna have to fit all Reese's food Gonna get cheap now nice very good up No, I'm not getting trapped here. It's a sheep. I got a big. I got a small dam up I'm cooking. I'm cooking still. Yeah, big just getting fair. I'm sure Resheep dirt sheep coming. I'm gonna welfare Yeah Yeah, do it. Do it. Please. He's just rafting me get my block I'm just I'm just lining him. I'm just lining him. I'm not fairing them waiting with it I'm lining me. Yeah, I've vanished in 30. I've vanished in 30 On his side on his freedom Reese's fit nice. Nice. Nice. You can get the sheep. Maybe push it. No, okay. I'm over. I'm over. Got you MC pre-sale rich rich, maybe Ryan Ryan. Yeah, I'm coming This is very far man. It's back here Can't get you there me. I'm gonna grow up if I can She me she me watch out. I'm gonna trick it Please fit Okay, take that. Okay. Bear me. Watch out Can you live? Nice vision Trying to get to you very close to death Shoot me Okay, right now. Can you fear please? Yeah, but I mean she you've got to stop the Major stopping me. Can you one can you one? Okay? Yeah, I'm gonna try and push for fair MD. I'm here right now. You're right. Okay. I have a blind. I'm blind. MC made. She's yes me Drink it Fear this spell shoot me. You need to use something or you're dead. We're pushing insanely hard I don't know why I'm really struggling to keep you alive. I'm gonna get trapped out. Nice blink He gave up I Don't want to use too much mana here. I'm just gonna pump the mage the entire game you play to live basically Pumping mage hard and res here CC mage if he can if he comes to me Nice resin Stop mage, maybe Yes, mage One more sheep No, no more sheeps. No more sheeps.  Don't care new king It's good for us You want fair, right? But it would come sooner my bad gonna try and MC off I'm seeing Ramsey Yes, first dark fake there Jump down. He nice. Yes, dude. So good same 15% down I'm gonna go for res Got in combat from nothing. He blows me off to pressing dark Rapture Trying to avoid the priest damage as much as you can the more you avoid the priest damage the more he goes Like if you're not going for sheep, you can just like jump down the bottom, right? You don't need to stand there.  This is bad sure Got the barrier off MC mage You can hit a priest here a bit if you want. I'm just trying to delay to get mana. I might just try and drink here job drinking Gonna need it for damp nice route. Yeah, go good manner. What good enough being rapture this Okay, I can fear it. I guess I'm gonna go for reds here resin stop mage Priest is coming more please might try and res or drink watch out Got you. She's just drinking. I'm not really gonna spell offensively. It's bad for mana rapture here Got the temp of insta. If you get CC now, we win. I think I'm gonna go for a res right now really awkward time for them Going for fear Missy mage. I meant priest. I lied. You okay? Please fit Oh He my call on the MD


So, where do we begin with our first story that we are going to bring to you from Off the Press? We should be looking at some of these stories that are making the headlines this morning. So, let's start with the Punch newspaper. The Punch newspaper leads with the headline, Walkers' Lament Hardship Score Buhari Governor's Law on Welfare. There you have it. The writers there, high cost of living, high cost of living has made nonsense of minimum wage. Exactly what we're talking about. 40% pay rise, unions. We have another writer there. Unions. Pensioners still earning 500 Naira and 750 monthly economy harsh under Buhari says retirees. Right. You have going down, you have opposition's rigging claim fraudulent. FG insists. Still talking about the just concluded elections. Well, has it concluded yet? That remains to be seen. You find details of that on page 8 of that newspaper. Alright. Let's move on. Okay. We have other stories also from other newspapers that we have here. Let's see what we got. We've got something from Nature News. Nature News. AFDB builds $25 billion world's largest solar zone. And under that story, you will find where it is written to provide electricity for 250 million people and then President tasks U.S. diversity class on global warming. Okay. We're hoping that that solar plant should be in Nigeria. We have all the sun that we need for that. Rainfall forecast. Federal government wants of impending flood. I do hope that everybody is listening because we were warned about thunder and lightning. And a few days afterwards, it struck in Benway state. And instead of the people knowing that they have been informed that this may happen, they went and buried two people alive saying that they were the cause of the thunder that killed, unfortunately killed an entire family. Okay. Climate change. It's unwise for Nigeria to abandon fossil fuels now. So we should continue to mine our oil. We also have federal government orders, no vaccination policy for control of bed flu in fowls. Okay. We have a story on benefits of leafy greens. When you go natural, you go healthy. And then, okay, those are about the major headlines on Nature News. We're hoping it will read up on them and many more. Yes. So from Nature News, we go to the Nation newspaper with leads with You Remain Saw Losers. Federal government tells PDP and LP. You Remain Saw Losers. Don't pre-empt tribunal outcome. Those are some of the writers. Opposition parties fire back. It's the government and the opposition parties going back and forth on these issues of Accusations. The federal government has repeatedly, I think this war of words. We saw this war of words kicking up last week. Kicking up last week between the leading party, the ruling party and the opposition parties. All right. So on the side, one of the minor headlines there, Sudan evacuation. 637 Nigerians stranded at Boda would write us their Egypt delays clearance. Federal government moves Port Sudan route. On top, you have APC legal advice that recommends Lukman's expulsion. You find the full story on page five. Worker's engine room of growth says Laon. You also find that on page five of the Nation newspaper. Three are board students for UK exchange program. You find that on page six. And Rivers Fest to host Tinnubu says also you find details of that on page six. I think that's about it for the Nation's newspaper. Okay. Worker's lament eight years of unkept promises. That's the Guardian. We're going to the Guardian right now. The Guardian newspaper says workers lament eight years of unkept promises as minimum wage loses value. You can find that on page six of the Guardian. We also have a story on over 2,500 undocumented Nigerian students stranded in Sudanversities. That one is on page two. Nigeria loses $4.5 billion yearly to foreign artisans in construction industry. You find that story also on page 18. Then why Lagos fund demolished buildings in Ajau estate? Or demolished, rather, buildings in Ajau estate. The Federal Air Force Authority of Nigeria and Lagos have demolished some buildings. Again, Lagos Ibadon Road Repair Misses Facialized Dateline. That is page nine of the Guardian. And then NIN issuance nears $100 million as government intensifies data harmonization about time. We do hope they harmonize this data so that we don't need to queue in for a lot of things that we need to just get easily. We're glad to know you're still there and watching the breakfast on Plus TV Africa. And today is mindset Monday. We're hoping you're going to have a positive mindset towards everything. And one of the things is today we're celebrating workers, the world over. So happy workers day to you. And we're being joined by a public affairs analyst all the way from River State, Opunabo in Kottaria. Welcome. Good morning and welcome to the program Opunabo. Good morning and good morning and good morning. Happy workers day. Yes, yes, yes. I can see the way you said that, yeah, yeah, yeah. I can be a conflicted person. You know the answer already. Are you a happy Nigerian Worker Opunabo? Let's start with that. Well, first of all, I'm happy that I'm sad that I'm self-employed. Okay. Well, let's kick-start this review. Because of the environment that makes it almost impossible for users to try. Let's kick-start the review of the headlines with what relates to what we're just talking about. Worker's Lament, from the point, Worker's Lament Hardship, Score Buhari Governor, Buhari and Governor's Lou on Worker's Welfare. That would be great. Yes. I'm listening. Yes. Those were the headlines. Are you also of the opinion, scoring the present administration so low? This outgoing President Muhammad Buhari's administration low on Worker's Welfare. When you say low, on a scale of 0 to 100, in an exam, you score 40, you say you score low. This administration has performed that decimally. This administration has failed Nigerians. There is really, it is one administration that will be found one thing. At the end of this tenure, which is going to be tonight. And the worst in the history of this country, including the energy it gives. It could go together. Are you talking of Worker's Welfare? Are you talking about health? Are you talking about education? Is the most corrupt administration of the country? At least, I've seen a lot. I'm 53. So, I've seen most, I was born into the military era. I've seen the first civilian administration, the second and this one. No comparison whatsoever. And the most annoying thing is that they try themselves at the best, especially when the likes of Lieb Mohamed and the special assistant of media and stuff. And at times I begin to wonder if they are living in the moon, or if they have some level of inertia. We have never had anything bad in this country. Not just Worker's Welfare. The leadership is cataclysmic. There is nothing to write to my body. We are the president that is constantly on the long soldier. He's either in one country, even if a commission and another country's son is getting married, he wants to go. And I have a belief that, even when not invited, he will put a call across to say, invite me out. Are you not being too harsh on the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? The boss talks at his table. The boss talks at his table. And at no point in time can the president generate himself from whatever blame. Because if the country is being run smoothly, and to the satisfaction of everybody, we also take the blame. So you cannot... Yes, someone would say to you that when he came into office, Nigerian workers were receiving 18,000 minimum wage, but he moved it up to 30,000 a month. Okay. 18,000 minimum wage. People were able to buy bag of rice. People were able to buy fuel without stress. People were able to pay school fees. People were able to pay rents, buy cars, at 18 Naira minimum wage. Now you have 13 Naira minimum wage. We cannot afford a bag of rice. You see how illogical, unreasonable that has been this. The 18 Naira of that time, before he got into office, he would like him to... 200 Naira of today. So it's all an attempt of this man, probably of logic, for anybody to come up with such an argument. He must have intellectual anemia to talk about that. Because the 18,000 Naira of that time is about 200 Naira of today. How much was a liter of people? How much was a liter of diesel? So how can you think that human is not tenable at all? At all. This is a government that is rather less, in all aspects. But how much did you have in our desire before now? And how much do we have now? And the question... There's not the wrong but the question is, the rationale behind the borrowing. That's the question. The one is borrowing so far, what have you done with that? How have they impacted positively on Nigeria? Most of these monies are borrowed to test or line their pockets. You can imagine right now, there are what in contrast of how many billions of dollars. There's not the wrong government is a continuum, you can argue that. But like I rightly said, is it reasonable? The reasonableness in that borrowing is what we can argue. Otherwise there's not the wrong borrowing. But when you borrow, what are you using the money for? And you're going to transfer the whole burden to your successor you didn't come in government. Which I don't want to talk about right now. Because that's got the focus. That's got the focus. Okay, let's move. We are going to hand over to... Oh my God. Justin, ask me. All right. I understand your passion. But let's move because of the brevity of time for this section of the program. Let's move to another headline. And that's the one on the nation newspaper. The exchange of words between the federal government and the opposition parties. You remain sole losers. Federal government tells PDP and Labour Party and the opposition fire back. How do you respond to this? Yes, yes. The war of words. Well, for now, I'm like a declared... I'm a tenable... The president in that... In very complete... I... Without a presentation I would say that there was some level of complicity. INET and the ATC. Because if you take on the advisement, the issues... INET flouted its own guidelines. They are building their dam power wreck. When the head is rotted, the body will be rotted. The Ademara Red took appeal from the INET chairman. What is their guideline? Why? You must announce the results from this... Oblate results from the polling units. And before you announce, you must ensure that what you have in the people is exactly what the... The polling officers or what are they called? HAH. And the party agents are going to come home. In that same place, in most cases, results are announced by the INET chairman without verification from the polling units. Well, this is half online. So why are you getting the wreck? Ademara Red. What is good for the good is good for the dam. If you can do it, why can't I do it? Because there was a breach of all the guidelines and law to tell you that. Abidisho, they were prepared to compromise their lessons. He went and brought the Red, whoever, to convey materials who is a non-member of the APC until they went to court to stop it. They didn't need to even be educated to know that that is not proper, that you're going to be accused of going back. They said they were going to escort you back. So they didn't think of any method at all. What sort of ludicrous excuse did you give? That's what I'm telling you. That Abidisho prepared to compromise their lessons. So when the lines of law in Mohammedan Co. come up to say they are solidars, they are also solidars. Because their election was rigged. Rigged. Be held out. You have enough evidence to bolster this. Enough, more than enough. Also that the elections were rigged. The Divas were made to mediate the process. The Divas? It did not. The Damawarek has written to the IGP from hiding that he did no wrong. So let's see how that plays out. Wherever he's hiding from, he wrote a letter to the APC. That is the same thing. Mahmoud Akubi said he did no wrong. This election is even worse than Mauritius Woot's election. If it was election, for how much? Three hundred and one billion? Why are there people like this? They don't think we are fools? Everybody has an opinion. It was true from the tragedy. And the tragedy has come to an end. Okay. Open up. Okay. Look, you people try to trigger. When I say if I'm not talking about I'm in Nigeria, trivialize these issues. But, look, we are headed slowly but steadily I've been touch us before then there would be another. Because when a man is pushed to the wall, a buses back with him double that. Nigerians are suffering. So we are expected, we thought that this election, the last election was going to be all out of the mountain, of distant. Sorry, the fatigue of distant. I think of this and take out the mountain of hope. But it failed. Our host dashed, dream shattered. And promised of a brighter future. Keep right. And you know when frustration sets in, it's not all about trying to back the pressure, trying to back Nigeria. It's going to be a spontaneous way. So we should not to realize this issue. And when they talk now, they say, oh, they want to see you for trying to plot two and all. What public are willing? Well, the cases are in court now. It's uncency. Yes, like rain that justice will be served but not judgment. I don't want judgment. Because that will definitely not justify the situation. Then justice be served. People are not just, if you are a blessing, justice must not only be seen, but must, that's already done, but not be seen to have been manifested to God. You know that even the market woman, your kinder rider, should be satisfied that justice was served. We don't want judgment. We want justice. So we are waiting for the Supreme Court. As a Supreme Court, because that is the last bus stop. We are waiting for the Supreme Court. And not the in-state kind of justice, judgment. When you have somebody paying for it, the Supreme Court didn't give votes to the government.  Where you said you cannot sign to the mental court, I call you a sign to the mental court. You can sign to the court and they exceed it. The court said he's a candidate. We don't want, not want judgment. Which is in violation of the electoral act. When a man is pushed to the wall, he bounces back with the government. The Supreme Court is up to the last hope. We are waiting. Okay. So let's look at some other headlines now. We're talking about Sudan and what is happening in Sudan there. We have headlines, one of them on the nation newspaper saying 637 Nigerians stranded at the border there. And also on another newspaper, the Guardian is saying that 2,500 Nigerians are undocumented in Sudan. But the budget was made for 5,500 Nigerians. Now these figures are coming out. What's your response to the fact that Nigerians are stranded at the border and that there are some others that we didn't even know about? The way we know the number of Nigerians in this country. Hello? Can you hear me? Yes. Do you know the number of Nigerians in this country? Do we take record? We don't even know. Today we are over 150 million. Tomorrow over 200 million. That's tomorrow over 300 million. But the third budget is a country pie. If you don't know the number of Nigerians here, can you know the number of Nigerians in another country? We don't know. Even your governors don't give you the number of people living in their streets. It's only a conjecture. And now census has been postponed. Sorry? And now census has been postponed. The census exercise that we're told was going to be... No, the only sense was to ensure that because the government means the budget for the census is prepared so that those that will be a packing gift, a lot of people, those that will ensure, work behind the scenes to ensure the budget is approved and all those... Allegedly. That's the only sense. They knew... Well, let's say the states are allegedly... Because they'll give you a fine of 5 billion. So please say this. I said it. You didn't say it. It is not plus two billion. That's why we have to use allegedly to... That's what I'm saying. I said it. It's not plus two billion. Because MBC will soon give you 5 billion. I said it. I'm repeating it. On the structure of life, they will give you 5 billion. Now, back to the issues. The truth is, yes, most times Nigeria's emigrants. There is this illegal movement as a result of the hardship in this country. To different countries. So there are some illegal ones. And then there are some illegal ones you might not necessarily... I want to be honest, necessarily know the figures. You can only know the figures of the illegal ones. No doubt about that. But the government will hide under that. That's why I keep the reasons. The truth is, the Nigerian government does not know the number of Nigerians living in this country and living elsewhere. It's based on conscience. Now, talking of evacuees, have you heard that in evacuating the citizens, America had issues? Canada had issues? Newtale had issues. Have you ever heard of that? When you fail to plan, you have to plan to fail. I said the government is fraudulent. It doesn't know what to do. First and foremost, why the deleterinates? Why the delay? I heard, because the former minister for external affairs, actually, Ebola came in. He said most science, even the embassy, that starved up for me. And so it's difficult for even the ambassador and high commissioners to function. Difficult. Because ordinarily, when they realize that this might snowboard into a new world, it is the duty of the ambassador or high commissioner who is representing the president to start preparing for evacuation, especially in countries like Sudan. They were relaxed. Did nothing. But I believe he would have evacuated his family member. Not possible. Long before. So that tells you the way that our government treats its people. The legality with which lies are treated. Let me do with which lies are treated in this country. Kill one man.  Kill one American. If you're not careful, there are the war. And within 19 minutes, it's too much because then technology has not improved. It will be 20 seconds in and out. Just kill one American. Look at where one American's life was treated. How they came into this country and took him away. Yes. And the second government came out, came from there to lie that they were wealthy. I remember that incident clearly. Let's move on to the Guardian newspaper. And one of the low headlines there, smaller headlines says, again, Lagos Ibadu Road Repair, Mrs. Fashola's Deadline. The Lagos Ibadu Road Repair, Mrs. Fashola's Deadline. Give us your take on that. You know, there is this virus in this government. Fashola has a government. They form credit. Credit. But you know, don't be... I forgot how the Bible put it. Don't be on evening youth. And it got on evening youth. That is the problem. Now, also understand his limitations. It's not the chief executive. As government was the chief executive. So he performed. He called himself. But you have the virus in this planet's system that destroys everything. No matter how well-intentioned there will be a problem with the virus in this government. And that I believe is Fashola's problem. But you know, you must have gotten enough assurances from Mr. President. And the federation has to say, yes, we are going to do this. We are going to do that. But he has forgotten that he's serving in a government with misdemeanour, with words of inter-analysification and interposition. A government that has no credibility. You can't go back with what they've said. Look at the former samissi, Burakai. The NSA said what they have on ground cannot justify their mouth. Their successors said the same thing. What happened? They were rewarded. Look at Magu. They only come after you when they perceive you as an enemy. Fashola thought it was going to be once in a while. The question a lot of people say, why didn't you resign? I resigned. Fashola said, why didn't you resign? Why didn't you resign? He took Bueru, he believed Bueru, two clients. For what reason that? Sorry, let me not go and say something about it. It's a five billion dollar fund. But we're not bought in Coteria. He disraid Bueru. He had a new business of Bueru. He thought Bueru was Bueru of 2000, in 1984. He has forgotten that Bueru was not even allowed to resign. Before you go, because time is not on our side, before you go, tell us the state of the river state workers where you've resigned. The state of their welfare. Manakusa did it. Manakusa did it and changed the situation. Very, very, very bad. I was listening to your previous, I mean, I'm sorry, before we started this, before we started. Now, I'll tell you, like Ragnis said, you don't talk of bridges and saying, these are different. It's not me who did it because you elected to do it. You elected to include on the welfare of Nigeria. But then, like Jeter Steve, I keep making reference to Jeter Steve. Like Jeter Steve. Why he talked about infrastructure development, he also talked about human capital development. They've run simultaneously side by side. Jobs were created, industries were built, jobs were created. And at the same time, the roads and so on, we are being taken care of. That is government for you. You don't concentrate on the infrastructure development. It's simply because you're looking for money to further your pockets. And when you want to pay salaries and pension, you cannot come from us. So that is immaculate. You don't have to motion. Salaries are old. Pensioners are old. Is that governments? There's no governments. Why do you want to belong to this? The welfare, in fact, this is so enshrined in our constitution. The welfare is the most important thing to everybody. The bills are what you build. Are they going to be used by spirits? They are going to be done. A man who has not eaten, of what uses the bill. A man who has not eaten. Is it going to back up? So it makes no sense. I also run and build 20 bridges. Build 10 bridges. I use the money for the many times to be definitely employed. Even the British are building with no employment. First and foremost, most of them are paid 750 naira per day. This is less than 30,000 naira. And the last time when the protested, one was killed, they all disappeared. They were first arrested and detained by the police. They were not talking about by the police. So when you build bridges, I'm talking about in terms of financial gains now. Something which is less than 30,000 naira. So what kind of employment? And what level of people? The lower class, the middle class and the upper class. Those are peasants. They can never be made managers. So it's another form of slavery. So if you have to build 20 bridges, build 10. All our industries are dead. They're being set up by the state. In the 60s and early 70s, water glass was all dead. So there is employment. And there is embargo on employment in the civil service. Although some are secretly being employed. That's what I said. We are changing discrimination. So that exactly I'm not trying to encapsulate. That exactly the picture of Newcastle. Thank you so much for your analysis of Punebo in Quaterra. It's been so good listening to you. Give your insight and thoughts on these very important topics on our headlines. Well, that's the much we can take on off the press on the breakfast this morning. This day with us, we'll continue to come back with our hot topics.


Meat Boy is kind of back because there's some bacon in this recipe. I was trying to think of a nice hors d'oeuvres appetizer to serve for a family for Christmas, New Year's, and this was something that my family made years and years ago. I remember having this a couple of times. Simple, definitely like stands an American, very approachable. Everyone's going to like it. And maybe next week we'll do something a little more upscale like a lamb chop with a mint yogurt, but not everyone likes that. So let me show you guys what you need. And you guys see what I mean by stand an American. You got cream cheese, white bread and bacon. Those are the only three ingredients. We're going to put some cream cheese on the bread, wrap it up with the bacon, and then pop it in the oven for a little bit. I mean the cream cheese is organic, but you know there's still some ingredients in here that you definitely don't want. Like locust bean gum, cultures that aren't natural. It's definitely not 100% grass fed. The bacon is an organic. I actually noticed that. Usually I get the organic bacon, which honestly isn't much better, but they're being a little deceiving with this packaging here. They put green on it, so I didn't notice because the USDA organic logo is usually green. Very, very, very deceiving. But we do have organic white bread, which again doesn't have the best ingredients. There's a lot of stuff in here that you wouldn't normally want to eat, but it's better than what most people are eating and your family isn't going to feel too horrible after consuming this. So the only prep you have to do is make sure the cream cheese is room temperature as the white bread can break fairly easily. So then you cut the edges off, and depending on the type of bread, you can do this before spreading the cream cheese, but that might make it easier to break. Then we slice the bread in half, slice the bacon in half, take a piece of bacon, take a piece of bread, and we're just going to roll it up and then stick a toothpick through it. Honestly, this will probably work with any type of bread, even the bread alone sourdough bread, as long as you could roll it. I just figured the white bread would be a lot easier to do this with. But after seeing how stale this white bread is, I'm sure you could do it with any type of bread. And since this bread is so firm and kind of stale, now we could even stack all four of the slices and just slice the edges off at once. That's really it. Quick, simple, easy, only five minutes of prep. And as you can see, some of these don't look that great, because it depends on how the bacon was sliced. You know, these are kind of nice and almost perfect. The other one's kind of swiggly, but either way, it's going to be delicious. So I'm putting the oven on 400 because we just want this bacon to crisp up nice and quickly before the cream cheese melts, before the bread gets soggy or anything. My sister smelled the bacon, so she's already up here, but it's been maybe 15 minutes, so we're going to let these cool for a little bit. Hello, YouTube people. Fucking, or what? Hello, YouTube people.  At least I hope. Yep, because then I won't be on stage. She doesn't screwed anymore. I don't want to hear about it. Oh, hot, hot, hot.  I don't know. You can get really creative with it, but this is a quick and easy way to do it. Anything, Gina, very nostalgic? Mmm, very good. The cream cheese is very good. Only one more, Gina. I'm taking more, she's so good. We don't negotiate with, oh, I can't say that word on YouTube. So I tell her she can only have one more. She takes three. Tell us how much I care. They're so good. Well, thank you guys for joining me. Hopefully your family enjoys this recipe as much as mine. Quick, easy ingredients you probably already have in your fridge and it only takes a few minutes to make. If you'd like to support me, guys, you can go to frank-to-file.com. Outside of that, please drop a like on the video. Leave a comment down below. Subscribe so that YouTube can unsubscribe you next week. And be sure to check that notification bell so they don't notify you of my videos. Thanks again, guys. Bye, little people. See you tomorrow. See you tomorrow.


Okay, folks, Larry Pestimental setting in to TFNN to give us an update of the morning's actions as we start the afternoon. We got the stock indices up across the board, the Russell just turned positive. We've got Treasury bonds, Treasury notes are down a bit, gold is down about $8 or $9 and the rest of the grain markets are under a great deal of pressure as everyone knows by now. But that doesn't help anything because most of our trades that we've been doing have been in gold and in the stock market and in the foreign currency market. So it's been pretty good.  Now one thing we have to remember, folks, today's guest will be Mike Moore of More Analytics. He's been extremely bullish, the complex for the crude oil gasoline and heating oil. He'll be talking to us about that. Gasoline, excuse me, the heating oil made a new high by about $0.10 late last night and sold off about a buck and a half, which is really nothing for crude oil. But it's going to be interesting to see what kind of legs this could have to the upside because people are talking in the news there at Bloomberg about $100 crude oil. But every time I hear that, folks, I try to lop off one of the zeroes and put something else in because they're just taking a sophisticated guess just like we all do. What we're doing as a technician is we're trying to find a place where there's a place to go long or a place to go short. And that's the bottom line of what you're trying to do. Those of you that listen to me and get the newsletter and stuff, I've had major problems here with Google. They have someone has hacked me or done something because I'm not able. I can send things out, but they're not received by the folks. They're bounced back. So if you didn't get the newsletter, stay tuned for another day or two and we'll try to get this thing fixed. Right now it's nothing but the old pain in the kabuki. So I'm trying to fix it the best I'm not fixing it. I've got some people working on my crew. Let's put it that way is that working on it. But we do have an update substantially in the Dow Jones up about 350 points. The NASDAQ is up slightly and then S&P's up about 30 handles. So it is a big retracement from where we had on Friday where we had that big reversal day and then we didn't follow through on Sunday night. And now we're having another bounce up to the upside. So stay tuned. We're going to have a great show and I think you'll really enjoy it<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them for you if we can.


So, we will actually go ahead with the calculations which we are actually trying to do last time. So, I thought I actually have to last was the two matrix which have to be used for performance analysis. One of them was throughput and other one was turn around time. So, the way they are defined that throughput is nothing but average number of packets which are being pushed out per unit time that is how throughput is taken. It has nothing to do with the input of course, if you keep on changing your input rate throughput will change and throughput ultimately should saturate throughput ultimately should saturate turn around time will be your average time interval between instance when packet arrives at input of network and when packet leaves at the output of and of course, the maximum throughput will be existing when there are no conflicts. So, for example, at each input you have packets in such a way that there are no conflicts and all of them can be pushed without any contention to the outgoing port. So, that will be the case for maximum throughput and minimum turn around time also will happen when there are no conflicts because you will not be storing anything in the buffer just pass through. So, usually then we use the normalized version of these. So, whatever is the maximum throughput possible you can normalize with that this will ensure your normalized throughput is always less than 1 this for comparison sake it is independent of sizes now. So, that is a normalized value similarly for turn around time also. So, what is the basic unit of time counting you are essentially looking at that. So, you will divide it by minimum turn around time. So, these are the two normalized versions which actually have to be used. So, first of all we will actually estimate the same thing for unbuffered delta not the buffered one, but unbuffered one which we had done earlier. So, this one is pretty simple. So, for a 2 raise power n by 2 raise power n unbuffered delta you can assume p k will be the probability that. So, remember the k subscript. So, for different edges there will be different probabilities. So, I can actually iteratively compute if I know the input probability I can compute what will be the output probability and that will give me a throughput that is basically is the idea here. And from here you can define p n in the similar fashion this is probability that the packet arrive at output length all n stages have been finished. The total n minus 1 0 I am counting 0 1 2 3 n minus 1 are stages the moment I talk about p n that is the output length because there is nothing like a s n stage is not there s 0 to s n minus 1 are there. So, this will be a technically your throughput actually. Now, there are certain assumptions which have to be there. So, at every intermediate switch in general there can be many inputs and as we had done earlier each one of them is going to connect to a set of inputs. So, each one of these inputs will be connecting to set of inputs of the network. So, in earlier case it was only 2 set i x and i y I was talking about they were always disjoint. Here also all the sets which are going to form will be disjoint. Once they are disjoint since all arrivals at the network are independent and they are kind of independent identical process is actually arrival process. So, that independence also holds true here. In fact, it holds true at every intermediate switch. So, this actually means I can assume that p k is going to be same for all links all input links to stage k. So, not only this switch in that stage whatever number of switches are there all inputs in that stage they will be all independent. So, there is no correlation between them and this actually you can keep on extending it means this p n will be same for all output links also. That independence will still be maintained not for output side, but yeah p k is going to be same for all switches in stage k. Each one is an independent set actually and each one of them will be now connected to 2 raise power k inputs. So, since the number of inputs are actually being same to which it can reach and each set is different. Within a switch it is each set will be different. So, this will be showing independence this is actually true for everybody. So, they are going to be same they are independent within a switch. If you take two different switches then they are not independent, because they might be coming from the same input, but since every packet is also coming independently it is ok. The independence comes because of the fact when packet comes with the equal probability it is choosing an output destination. There is no bias with 1 by n probability 1 by 2 raise power n in this case it is going to choose any one of the output outgoing links and each packet in all inputs are going to do the same thing. So, statistically every input port is technically same you just find out probability at one place use it at everywhere unless you have asymmetric situation. It is a symmetric or uniform traffic conditions actually here. And important thing is that it is independent of what kind of delta network you are taking. Whether it is a shuffle net based or it is a inverse bands or whatever you have you can design or it is a omega network or whatever it is. So far it is a delta network the situation is going to be true. In fact it is true for any Banyan network not only this only in the case of Banyan network is that tag the address tag will not be uniform for a given output. Adress tag has to be different at different inputs for same output actually that is only variation. But so far that condition there is exactly one path from any input to any output is maintained and no input links and no output links in the intermediate stages are left open. This is going to be true. Technically it is a demultiplexed tree which you are building all the time and of course this is now throughput I can write a simple statement from here. Now paper actually gives slightly different variation here. I also could not figure out why it is been given that way. But what it is saying is in the whole switching network of K stages when the packet enters and packet goes out that is a period which is min D. So one lot of packet comes in it takes min D to go out and once the min D is over next then the next packet will come in. So there is one packet being injected at each input or if P is the arrival rate or the probability of having a packet on this input side the P fraction of packet on an average are being injected per min D slot. So min D is kind of a slot but actually it is not required in one slot if I am moving from one stage to another stage. So I can use piping when the packet moves here the another packet from input can come in here. So technically my number of packets has to be this particular slot that assumption has not been taken while computing the throughput performance. So throughput actually can be K times technically then what I am writing if this pipelining is also assumed. So pipelining is not assumed in the paper that is one thing which is done there. So throughput will be nothing but P raise power n which is probability that you are going to have a packet at the output link and total number of output links will be 2 raise power n and these many packets will go per min D slot but need not be per min D slot it can be per min D divided by K. So K times higher actually it can be achieved. So that will be the throughput I am just going to state whatever they have told. So this will be the throughput for all unbuffered delta networks in fact for that matter all Bunyan networks. So for that condition is satisfied that no input and output links in the input stage are left open and you have exactly one path from each input to each output and this we have to just estimate what is P n what P n has to be done through a recursion you cannot make a direct estimate once the P at the input link is given. So in this case now every stage you are going to have a switch remember and you are connecting them like this whatever way I am not bothered at currently something must have been done. Now each of this switch can be of A by B size general cross bar or in this case it has been taken as B symmetric case it is not a symmetric case you can solve for a symmetric case also that is also fine where A and B both are not equal. Now number of packets which are going to come are binomely distributed their B inputs as a single unit cross bar remember which is a simple switch. So for a cross bar of actually you can do it for in general for A by B also this paper does for B by B. So the packets which will arrive will be binomely distributed there can be J packets which can be arriving and this arrival can happen with the probability here the probability is P k remember probability that a packet will come will be P k at a input port. So this actually means B C J that is a probability that J packets will come and probability that a packet you take an output link.  So probability you will have a packet on the outgoing link that probabilities there has to be at least one packet out of these which is selected here this can happen for all outgoing links with equal probability. So this can be estimated as probability a packet and this is under the condition that given that J packets arrive at inputs. So this value will be nothing but you will simply say that each packet now this is a conditional probability J packets have already arrived I have to multiply by this is a conditional probability remember. So this probability is that out of these J packets which have arrived under that condition none of them is being directed to an outgoing port I can find out that probability and each outgoing port is going to be selected with equal probability actually the 1 by B. So you will have 1 minus 1 over B that is a selection probability see and 1 minus 1 over B that you are not going to select the outgoing port none of the J packets will be going to select an outgoing port is this and 1 minus of this at least 1 is going to select an outgoing port 1 minus of that. So that is a conditional probability that packet will be there given J packets and then of course you can find out what is P k plus 1 from here. So from here P k plus 1 so J can go from 0 to B and of course this is a conditional probability 1 minus 1 minus 1 over B J and I just multiplied by whatever is the condition which was B C J. So this is absolute probability that there will be at least one packet at the outgoing port I have just summed up with all possible J's condition thing I have removed technically. So this actually can be solved and this will turn out to be. So this whole thing now can be written as this one actually I am taking out summation of 1 minus 1 over B J and P k I can combine actually.  So it is a iterative thing which we will get actually. So it will be 1 minus so that will be the probability of P k plus 1 in terms of P k at this I think you can also figure out was for input Q's we have done similar thing when the packets were dropped except this P k was converted to something else there and of course you can always take for the maximum loading condition P 0 can be taken as 1 and from there I can find out what is the maximum possible throughput which you can have. So even buffer delta will always have throughput which is lower than this that is the maximum which you can get this is not maximum sorry this is not maximum. So this throughput is P 0 is 1 you can compute and maximum throughput is all outgoing packets will have a without conflict this is a maximum throughput you divide by this actually. So normalized throughput your you will get is nothing but P of n which you have to get from here but this has to be solved through recursion.  So this is going to be smaller value actually every time the value will keep on reducing decaying actually. So every step you will do it after k stages find out what is the value of P n and that is your throughput that is a normalized throughput the whole P n you are dividing by this value actual throughput which I defined was P n into 2 to the power n by but maximum which you can achieve is when all outgoing ports will actually have one packet every min D slot and if you allow pipelining you multiplied by k. Min D s contains k sub slots is sub slot you go from one input stage from the input of a stage to output of this stage for every stage.  You know how to get P k plus 1 from P k. Yes. So if you know P 0 is being 1 under maximum loading condition what is P 1 you can find out please. So P 1 will be. You need to sum up all these after this.  So then use last one when you will say sum of all probabilities has to be equal to 1 is the last equation which makes your number of equations become equal to number of variables to solve each one of them. Here you are getting the values actually directly. This is no Markov chain actually it is not a Markov chain. You will put 1 over 1 minus B this is the P 1 with value B P 2 you will can find out now putting P 1 find out P 3 P 4 so on iteratively is a recursive relation which you can get at best. That is what I get. There are n inputs you can use exponential or even Poisson. I am not worried about the input statistics input statistics the packet is always there. So in a input statistics cannot be exponential or Poisson remember there is a reason for that I am talking about a discrete even discrete time system is a slots. So packet can only start here and it has to close by one slot. So only statistics which you can use is either a packet can be there or cannot be there. So this is nothing but P you use the probability. So on an average how many packets per unit slot you will have it is P. P is the probability then and that is the arrival rate per line. So most of the discrete time system that is what you are using going to use for packet switching systems. Packets are not coming at any arbitrary time interval if that is permitted then that is a different situation. In our case it is not it is a fixed length packets coming one packet can come in one time slot. You cannot have two coming in actually remember those systems actually can be done but usually the way we do it in that case is if you have a switch for example and there is one outgoing link with buffer the many inputs which are coming in they are not time synchronized. All these packets which are coming will be put in one single queue. Now since they are not time synchronized I cannot get in this case technically what I am assuming because all slots are synchronized they are fixed length. In one time slot I can get either 0 packet I can get 1, I can get 2, I can get 3 that is a binomial thing. But if I do not I am not permitting synchronization and all packet are of fixed length then packet can arrive at any point of time on time scale they cannot then all of them need not come simultaneously. It is not 0, 1, 2, 3 in a slot. So packets will come sometimes here, sometimes here, sometimes here then I talk about inter arrival time which is exponential distributed or alternatively a Poisson distribution that how many number of packets will come in per minute time because these are all independent they because of that independence I can take that assumption not at a source. Source usually actually have a correlated what we call arrival process but as you go into the core when the packets will get dispersed and packets are coming from various different sources then only Poisson's statistics can be assumed. Actually sir had I made some assumption like number of packet tends to infinity and probability of each packet arriving means very close to 0 then I put an approximate equivalent Poisson distribution. In that case you could have turned out the limiting case of binomial distribution. Fine but then what is happening is you are assuming this time slot to be. Very small. That is what you are technically doing. So continuous time variable is nothing but a limiting case of this when packet can arrive not at discrete intervals but at any time interval at any time instant. A real life always works this way it is not this but if there are many incoming lines you cannot control what is happening in the behind you can always use it as a Poisson thing. So when you look at this kind of queuing system then you will say that the arrival and statistics here is Poisson but that does not matter we will always be doing the Poisson this thing binomial only. Poisson will not give the length of the packets it will give the only. Poisson will give only the number of packets which are going to come per unit time. The length of the packet will tell you what will be the departure process. If all packets are of fixed length it is a deterministic departure process. So you know that what is going to be it is a fixed length. If you know packets are only of length l and l 1 and l 2 they are only two deterministic departure time. So either it will take time t 1 or t 2 with some statistical distribution and if it is exponentially distributed that is what we assume most of time then you will define this thing as 1 over mu will be the average processing time or number of packets which can be processed per unit time will be mu is a departure rate but we are not looking at these cases here. Important thing is that we are going to use a iterative thing to build up the outgoing probability. So you will be able to get P n from here and for the throughput performance. Sir what is the iterative acceleration for in unbuffered case we are having throughput higher than in the buffered case. Buffered case you can see the every time the probability is going down. So I am actually assuming if there are j packets for example I am taking these four ports I get all four packets all four wants to go to this outgoing port only one of them will be going. So remember when I am looking at the probability I am actually telling even if one or more than one if they are trying to go to an outgoing port one will go that is how I am estimating P k plus 1. So it means remaining are being dropped while in case of a buffered delta case this is not going to happen and of course we are using a buffered delta model we are using a back propagation of the signal. So at the input itself at least we will get the what is the maximum throughput which can be achieved under maximum loading condition. In this case you put maximal loading the throughput is limited to P n when P 0 is going to be 1. So you will find this as a maximum throughput cross bar I need not do this iterative calculation cross bar and this are only different in what this is a calculation for a cross bar technically B by B cross bar but I am using recursive measure of that. So every time probability is falling down because of recursion in case of a single cross bar same thing will now become your P 1 is 1 minus 1 minus whatever was P 0 2 raise power n 2 raise power n that will be your throughput performance. So P 0 you can make it 1 if it is a full loading condition. So this is what will be your value and of course when n becomes very large 2 raise power n becomes very large this can be approximated as so P 0 you can put to 1 1 minus e raise power minus 1 which is 0.632. So that is a maximum throughput which you can achieve with a cross bar single cross bar the whole switch is implemented using a single cross bar or I am using it implementing by multiple cross bars by creating delta network. Yeah there is one single cross bar being used for the whole switch. So unperformed delta we know that how we will compute for this one we know how we are going to compute but this has to be done computationally there is no closed form expression which can be plotted but these are exact computational results which will be there. First is unperformed delta the throughput is P n P n normalized throughput will be P n. So similarly you can also normalize this also if you wish you have technically normalized this when you say P 1. So maximum is whatever is to this power n divided by min d. So that you have normalized P 1 is your throughput here is that is a P n. So P n certainly will be less than P 1 or more. So what we want to say is for all look across to a delta network the performance under those scenarios performance is almost same. In throughput performance will be same for all delta networks under those conditions what is mentioned under all blocking because there is no blocking technically the switches are all symmetric in one single stage and all inputs are independent. If the independence is not there then there is a performance will be different then you have to assign the input ports such a way they are two correlated inputs which are always going to pump the packets make sure there is two correlated packets are always going at different switches in the different stages. They should not never come to the same stage because they will not they should not try to pump the packets simultaneously. Is it cross bar implementation? This one. This is a single cross bar implementation of the 2 raise power n by 2 raise power n switch. That one I am using b by b switches to create 2 raise power n by 2 raise power n switch delta. So there is one doubt in this a cross b if we have the throughput will be same or. Formula will become different that is the only thing formula will be different in that case. You can compute not an issue you can compute for a by b I should have done that because that is done in the earlier paper I had actually is have not done the analysis at that time because that was anyway required to be done here but this paper only talks about a symmetric case. So for a by b it will be so what is the probability if you have a probability p k known here what is a probability that you will get at least one packet on this side. So each packet is being uniformly distributed over this thing. So number of packets which will be j you can actually compute that. So p k by b that is a packet will going to come to certain outgoing port none of the packets are going to come to this outgoing port 1 minus of this and all possible j scenarios actually no all this will be a sorry this will be a all inputs this one only tells that at this particular input I will have a packet with probability p k with p k by b this packet will be directed to this outgoing port 1 minus of that this packet which is going to come here will not be directed here this should be true for all a. So I have to multiplied by a is not b a b b here that is the only difference which will come and 1 minus of this there will be at least one packet going to which is going to come out here. So your p k 1 this will be equal to p k plus 1. So this recursive relation will change in this case. No unbuffered there is no buffering here buffered delta is tricky to handle. Remember in the switch total outgoing ports are 2 raise to the power n best case can be when every min D slot one packet is going out if one packet is going out every min D slot. So throughput performance is 2 raise to the power n packets per min D slot that is a maximum throughput. So whatever throughput actually compute divide by this to normalize it. So that is what is being done. So you divide this by 2 raise to the power n by min D you will get this. So you will get p k p n will be the throughput I have written somewhere here. So this will be p n will be the normalized throughput. So I just find out what is the value probability at the outgoing port per port throughput I am estimating technically. Per port maximum throughput is 1. So I am just estimating that p n. Sir in the previous this is we took 1 minus 1 by b therefore j. So that is j is the count of number of packets which are coming at the input. I could have directly calculated also by read it explicitly for j packets come with conditioned on j. So since a is the number of input line should not be a p k sir and the it should be raised to a p k because a p k will give the number of packets. Number of I am not clear. I will write it as p k.  Yes at least it is raised to that exponential where it is number of packets which are there. Let me compute with j packets if you want the other way around this is a direct calculation. Suppose j packets are going to come here what is the probability for that a c j when j packets have arrived what is the probability that at least one packet will be coming to an outgoing port. So this is a condition so that probability is 1 minus 1 over b j total j packets sum it over j. j can go from 0 to a remember solve it you will get exactly same thing that p k will not come in the exponent. Just a way to understand actually. So both are fine no questions so far. So next is now we have to go to the actual analysis of buffer delta system. Now buffer delta system I have to now look into what we call state transitions of a switch. So before I move on to that particular thing I have to define the switch state. Now remember they are buffers which are involved here. So they are all possible combinations are there. So we will define 14 states of the switches here and that I will use in a building up the recursive relation. Again this is done through a recursive relation which is computationally computed. There is no simulation it is a actual calculation which has to be done. So it is a computational procedure. So there is no close form expression as such but computationally you will get the exact values. So the model goes like this most of the states I am looking into 2 by 2 thing. So one state is when the buffer on the outgoing side which is nothing but the input buffer of the next stage. That is free and this is free that is one particular possible state. So this is known as state 1. So I am keeping all the inputs free and then trying to put packets on the output side buffer. So one possible states I am just numerating the states now when you will have only one packet. Now you can say this packet can be here or this packet can be here but both are equivalent states. So both are going to be all equivalent states are merged together the way we had done earlier. So equivalence is I can rotate, swap, do whatever it is but input and output cannot be swapped the way we did in the earlier case in case of that white sense passed on blocking system. So this is a state 2. Third one will be now when I will have 2 packets which will be there this is state 3. Whenever the packets are there at the input buffer they will be directed to some outgoing port. There was no direction of the packet was shown because there were no packets at the input buffer. So in this case this is what will be the direction. Now remember even if this direction is not this I put it like this way. This is equivalent to the earlier states because I can swap these 2 ports. So it does not matter. So I will represent this thing by this because these numbers will be used remember these state numbers. I will be mentioning in the subscripts later on for the in that computational model. Then you will have a state. So I am looking at one input and then one in output to output kind of combinations all possibilities. So one is this state 5. Now this input can be directed to this one that is one possibility this can be directed to a free port that is a sixth state. Now whether you direct to top or bottom it is all the same. There is only one input. Basically this cannot go because this is already filled up. So this is a state 7. Then you have all cases when one input was there in the switch are taken care of not 2 inputs which are there. So if there are free ports one possibility is both of them will conflict that is a state 8. They do not conflict that is a state 9. So whether it is a bar state or cross state does not matter. There is no conflict when 2 inputs are there both will be state 9. State 7 will be conflicting. Conflict can only happen if you have more than one input. But it cannot go on to the outgoing buffer because the next buffer is occupied for some reason. So no outputs I have taken care of one. One this could be one case this could be one case and then you will have a state number 13 and a state number 14. Cross and bar states in this case are exactly same. They will all merge into state 13. So whether the conflict happens because both want to go up or both who want to go down both are same states here. They are total 14 states which we have to define for a switch. So all switches will always be existing in one of these 14 states in a buffer delta system. So now here I actually close the today's lecture and will start now looking into probabilities and steps which are required for doing computational stuff of buffer delta. So that we will do on Thursday. You have to actually refer to the paper because I am trying to do it as slowly as possible but still there will be confusions.