Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebreaks.com coming at you with the brand new 2020-2021 Panini Prison Basketball 3 box. Pick your team at number 5. Big thanks to everybody here for getting into the action. If you have a little rooftop next to your name, that means you won that spot in the in a filler break, in a filler pack or something like that. I think Brett ended up getting last spot mojo with the Clippers. Alexander Wolfe, what's the best hit today in prison? I would take a look at jaspyscasebreaks.com, scroll down to the scroll down to the big hit gallery and then I think you'll see pretty clearly or on our Instagram at jaspysbreak. So here's a fresh case right here. Pop this guy open. Slide these boxes out. So these are three box breaks. So they're a they're a quarter of the case right here. So you can see on the top camera right there, four columns. So we're going to select a die. Let's select that one and we'll go one, two, three, four. If I roll a five or six, I'll just roll again like I did right here and like I did right there and it's four. One, two, three, four. So we're going to do the far right column. Put the die right on top of there. So this side. So we'll save these for pick your teams. So right over Lamello, we'll write PYT on there. Greg, where are you going to find the schedule for the breaks? Pinned right in the chat. Depend in blue. Yeah, Sean is terrible at throwing dice. I found I found like a blue die like underneath the table all the way next to the window the other day. It's a prison miracle. It's a prison miracle. Christmas miracle. Miracle on 34th Street. All right. So there's the stack we're going to do right here. A quick little three box break. Breaking it down into three box, I think, makes it a little more wallet friendly. Spoiler alert, Greg. This is the only break scheduled right now. There's nothing else sold out after this. Although that random team might sell out while we're doing this break. Does that sound of four spots? But nothing else uh nothing else is sold out. So let's sell something out. Then after this I can go through orders and add something to the schedule. I know right Rex and Oliver do not take Sean Jaspy to the craps table.  I know I'll get it. He'll feel bad. There's Lamello and then he'll try to pick up the die and hand it to him. They'll be like no just put it on the table sir. No no don't hand it to me sir just put it on the table. There'll be all sorts of things happening there. All right then they'll have to get the new die.  All right just play the don't pass and he's up. There's our first Lamello for Charlotte and that is for Jaehoon who picked up the Hornets straight up. I think this is an easy what few hundred bucks right here people are saying. I'm sure it'll it'll it'll dip a little bit but it'll plateau out. It'll probably plateau out nicely though if it's starting at 300. There's Emanuel quickly red wave so in the pick your teams unlike the random teams the pick your teams all card ships so if I miss anything don't worry all cards will ship. We also have a whole list of rookies that we're going to be looking out for to sleeve and top load so I'm going to try to pull most of those as we go along but if we if I miss something our shipping team will take care of that like Patrick Williams base for the bowls and there's Demarda Rosen blue ice so Patrick Williams going to go to Adam Kelly. Wow Oliver you saw one four four to five hundred for Lamello it's even nicer. There's Demarda Rosen to 125 that'll be for the Spurs it's going to go to Adam and the autograph is Big Shot Rob Robert Ory and his Lakers gear nice the best version of Robert Ory that goes to Joe and my Lakers not me Joe R Rothfey Tyrese Halliburton Precious Achua Hyper and Bruce Brown red wave there you go that's a nice Halliburton for the Kings Luis won that in the pack break that filler break right there there's Vince Carter rafters throwing out Patrick Beverly here red wave Seamus Ramsey and there's Onyeka Okongu there you go David Epstein what's better a meal at the bullpen or a drink at old Tony's are you talking about the bullpen in San Diego the sports bar and are you talking about full Tony's near the marina in LA are we on the same page there it's Devonte Graham Hyper and Isaiah Stewart to 99 I don't think I've ever been to the bullpen Redondo Beach as Isaiah Stewart purple for Detroit yeah I don't think I've ever been there now to think about it Ryan case and it's just Troy there's Kemba for the Celtics to 199 for Oliver I don't think I've ever been here yeah I think it was yeah I do love those throwback cards Brennan has Portland where is I've definitely been in this area a number of times that little village area I believe I've never been there there's rookie signatures Killian Hayes and that mojo vibe their mojo refractor going to the Pistons rookie auto for Ryan Cason out of 25 nice a lot of Cougars prowling the bullpen all right let's check that out marry into some money deer and fox 84 out of 299 Kings it'll be for Luis Kyrie downtown silver and there is an Anthony Edwards right here nice Minnesota Timberwolves going to TD Williams I'm not sure that looks like manufacturing scuff right there I don't think any of the other cars have which is unfortunate but it's kind of annoying yeah I just want to highlight that for you when you get it and there's a silver Siddiq Bay love rookie silvers this is for Ryan and Detroit we've got Dwayne Bacon purple ice to 175 and that will be Charlotte edition going to Jehoon and here's box two well things are slowing starting to end that random team break by the way down to one pick your team six still has six teams left if you want to grab your team straight up we may be may even be able to do the next break straight up without a pillar I think things are opening up now I don't know what the status of the bullpen is I think that they hopefully looks like they're still they've been doing dining and takeout so they have they have survived the pandemic maybe they'll be back to normal position you know when we were when we were looking for stores after before when we were looking for we landed in this location but before then we were actually looking down in that area but I think all the the retail space was a little too small for our needs all right Brandon what's going on I think you have the trail blade nothing too crazy for the trailblazers there's an old throwback prism card of Damian Lillard but too crazy after that silver Kendrick Nunn yeah in that Riviera village area and we were even looking if you keep going down the one we were even looking down there and around the corner of PC to maybe on Palace Verde's Boulevard you know what's that what's that famous ice cream shop that's around here I think we were looking there as well what's that handles right right yeah there it is yeah just down the one a little bit further yeah it handles we were looking for uh we're looking at a space right near there too it didn't work out there's Oladipo red wave Robert Covington purple ice to 175 so Giannis Ben Simmons silver and there's a obi toppen an obi toppen a and that's for Eric and the Knicks there's a silver rookie Skyler Mays going to Atlanta that's for Matthew Shearer correct correct Mike Tower we have also thought of purchasing a jasmine yacht to do offshore braking but it would only be like it would only be flawless that's what we do we'd only break flawless on the yacht there's Daniel Turo and Cody Zeller I like these old school cards right here too and we've got to get people on the yacht to buy into flawless and you'd have to buy in because of the implication there's the Anthony Mountain Silver there's Dennis Schroeder hyper still in his okc gear there and there's a purple Jaden McDaniels and he reveals an Anderson Vergeau autograph remember Anderson Vergeau this is for Sean Matik and the Cavs Cleveland this is for you it's Anderson Vergeau doing these days did Anderson Vergeau did he win a chip with LeBron no I don't think he did he was once NBA all defensive second team I think he was playing he was playing in Europe I think in 18-19 there you go and once again that's for Cleveland for Sean Matik the Jaden McDaniels goes to TD 25 out of 99 purple and Anthony Hardaway red wave Derek Jones Jr nice LeBron right here for Joe R and and the uh Lakers Cody Zeller silver Dearon Fox Nick Richards Jamal Murray and Orange Seth Curry and we got Daniel Turo for the Clippers it's autograph for Brett last spot mojo strikes again that's right Lushy McBear would be the mascot of the of the break yacht there's Seiku Demboya RJ Hampton and the last box coming up Mike Tower what would the uh what would the name of the yacht be Greg how much for a hobby box and and you can open it on here no I can't open it here all of our personal breaks are a separate channel if you go to at jaspie's breaks on instagram you can go check it out there and there'll be the website on there too different from all the group breaks or case breaks are on jaspie's case breaks dot com and all of the personal boxes are on jaspie's dot com and that should have price information and we can open it on our live instagram stream which is going on right now there you go Mike Tower broken dreams breaking dream I like great I was gonna say breaking dreams we're on the same page I think breaking dreams is better there there you go no worries Greg good luck in your adventures in prison basketball now I like that big hit express good good name for the jaspie yacht ooh all over I like that the one of one go sailing on the one of one all right third and final box here from a fresh case pick your team five have a tutor maybe once once we get the jaspie yacht we'll uh we'll have a naming contest or something dirknewitzky duane wade to 49 and a silver luke adanche this is like third year luke adanche but I'm sure I'm sure these silvers still do nicely Matthew silversing with that one nice duane wade orange going to louise and the heat 49 out of 49 and a desmond bain did I pass another luke a silver all rookie red wave here's obi toppen derrick jones jr to 199 oh and the random team sold out let me open that before nick posts another one all right derrick jones jr miami heat that'll go to louise there's the obi toppen for eric and the nicks duane wade um autograph by the way louise that's just an autopilot there for a second nice uh nice duane wade autograph it's pretty awesome I've heard of him he's pretty good when look harder junior hyper john wall to 299 greg with the wizards oh frank what what if we get oh if we get more boats I guess we'll just have to have to name it something else jimmy butler silver a spencer din witty red wave although maybe we should put that yacht money into like a suite at the uh at the uh staple center behind goren draugage is there you go asking each i'll receive oliver oliver's like where are the patent pritchards here's a silver patent pritchard going to oliver and the celtics who we might see play tonight right now i think that's the espn game dallas uh the maves are in boston i think pritchard's been getting some some playing time there's yusef nerkic a hyper zion wiliamson downtown insert that's for the pal that's for mark silver tristan thompson julius randall redwave he's having a great year kyle lowery there's a blue joe lmb to 199 that'll be for adam kelly and the sixers there's tyrell terry rookie signatures nice going to matthew and the dallas mavericks it's bad luck to rename but yeah we're not we would rename the one of one if we got the second boat it'd be like i don't know it would be like breaking dreams or something like that the one of one will always just be the one of one that's the first boat ever for jaspies there's lory market into 299 behind williamson that old school prism design lebron james his teammate alex caruso and kody zehler and there you go boys and girls pretty nice break three box picker team five in the books thanks everyone for breaking with us for watching for having fun we appreciate it i'll see you next time for the next one on jaspiescasebreaks.com bye


remember where you started. Something that all of us don't often do is remember where we start. A lot of times we're always thinking about the future, thinking of where we wanna go, of how far we are away from our goals, but we don't think about how far we've come. And sometimes sitting down and just contemplating how far you come can be extremely beneficial. It can keep you encouraged and motivated to stay on the path. Like for me, sometimes I come out to this home gym here, which you can see. See, this is where I started working out. I still remember, back when I was skinny, I used to look at these posters, thinking about getting as big as this guy, doing push-ups at home, sit-ups, lifting some of the small weights around here. As you can see, I haven't used this gym in a long time, things that kinda dusty. Not just with my body, not just physically, how far I've come, but mentally, how far I've come. Just think about the mindset you had a few years ago. How deeper your perspectives are now.  Don't always be thinking about how far away you have to go. If you focus mainly on the present, and just remember the grounds you've made, how far you've come, you're gonna be motivated enough to reach the goals that you need to reach in the future. Sometimes we beat ourselves too much about the lack of progress, but think of yourself three years ago. Do a little thought experiment. Think of yourself four or five years ago, looking at yourself now. How would you feel? You'd be proud, I would've never thought that I would be where I'm at right now. Four or five years ago. And that makes me wonder, where am I gonna be four or five years from now? Am I gonna be the same amount of, how should I say, how do I put this? I might have the same amazement looking back at my mindset from four years ago today. If I was to look at myself four years down the line, and I was looking at myself now, this makes any sense, would I have the same or the same amazement at the grounds I've made in terms of physical gains and mental gains and spiritual gains? It's just something to think about guys.  Look at how far you've come. I'm gonna show you how to be proud of the notification gang.  And you get notifications as soon as the videos are up. Peace.


Hi everyone, it's MJ and this is the introductory video for the course on hypothesis testing. Now I love hypothesis testing and it's a very, very important component of statistics. In fact, hypothesis testing is where science and research and empirical investigations really gets involved and how it works, it's saying that, you know what, we need information on our parameter and our distribution. What would happen if we would have to set up a null and alternative hypothesis? Which is just fancy wording for saying let's take a guess of what we think the parameter is going to be and then let's look at the data, let's work out some confidence intervals and let's see if our guess is correct or not correct. So hypothesis testing, what we're going to be seeing in this course, it very much is a procedure, we've got a bunch of steps to follow, the math isn't that difficult, the philosophy behind it is interesting and we do discuss that in the course and it is something that a few students might struggle with, but other than that hypothesis testing it's a lovely, lovely part of the course because we're now getting to utilize a lot of the inference that we've been doing in the previous courses and we're actually using it now to answer some questions, to optimize processes and we're starting to see the fruit of statistics. So I'm looking forward to teaching you guys this course and as always if you've got any questions please let me know in the comment section below. Cheers.


Hello and welcome to the session in which we will introduce the concept of international operations. Why companies operate overseas? Why do they sell internationally? Well, international operations refer to activities, which is transaction, buying and selling product by companies across national borders. So first you might start to operate in your own country. Maybe first you will start in your own hometown, then in your own district. Then you expand throughout the whole country. Then if you are successful, what do you do? You expand overseas. You expand internationally. Several reasons why businesses engage in international operation and they can vary based on the company's objective and market conditions. These days, these days, expanding internationally is much, much easier. Most likely you are listening to me right now. You could be in India, you could be in Canada, you could be in the Middle East, you could be in Africa, you could be in Europe, or you can be in the United States. So for example, my business is expanding internationally. Why? Because I'm going to tell you why, because I want to expand my market. But there are several reasons why you will do that. Comparative advantage is one reason. Market expansion, which is for myself, I want to have a market expansion. I don't want to limit myself to the US. Access to resources, cost reduction, technology and innovation, risk diversification, strategic alliances and the existence of imperfect market. Because of all of these reasons, we're going to look at each one of them separately. As you know, once Farhad has a list, we'll go over each item separately. For those reasons, we operate on an international level. Either we sell our product overseas or we move to different countries and operate over there. So let's go ahead and get started by discussing an important concept called comparative advantage. Before we proceed any further, I have a public announcement about my company, Farhad Lectures.com. Farhad Accounting Lectures is a supplemental educational tool that's going to help you with your CPA exam preparation as well as your accounting courses. My CPA material is aligned with your CPA review course such as Becker, Roger, Wiley, Gleam, Miles. My accounting courses are aligned with your accounting courses, broken down by chapter and topics. My resources consist of lectures, multiple choice questions, true-false questions as well as exercises. Go ahead, start your free trial today. What is comparative advantage? It's an economic principle that explained the benefit of international trade between countries. Basically, why do countries trade? There's a benefit and that benefit is called, is based on something called comparative advantage. It suggests that countries or its state, that countries that specialize in producing goods or services in which they have a lower opportunity cost. So what should you produce? You should produce items that you have lower opportunity cost of producing and trade with other countries to obtain goods or services for which you have a higher opportunity cost. So produce the product that you have a lower opportunity cost with and buy the product with a higher opportunity cost. Don't worry, we'll work an example. What is opportunity cost? It refers to the cost of foregoing, giving up the next best alternative when making a decision. So you have resources. What should you do with your resources? Well, you should produce a product that has the lowest opportunity cost and produce as much as them and take that surplus because you can produce it at a lower cost and trade with other countries. In the context of comparative advantage, the cost of producing one goods in terms of the production of another could have been produced instead. So what could you have been producing if you give up this item? The best is to illustrate, is to work an example. Let's assume in country X, the production of one T-shirt require using resources that could otherwise be produced to be used to produce 11 pair of socks. So in country X, well, they have two options with the resources. Resources could be material, labor, time, land, building, equipment. With all those resources, they have two options. They could either produce one T-shirt and if they do so, they will give up 11 pairs of socks and they cannot produce an 11 pair of socks. Or if they produce 11 pairs of socks, they cannot produce that T-shirt. In country Y, to produce one T-shirt, they have to give up 15 pairs of socks. So that's the cost for them. So which country has a comparative advantage in making T-shirts? Which of these two countries should make T-shirts in your opinion? Well, the comparative advantage here is to country X because country X, they only have to give up 11 pairs of socks. It doesn't cost them that much, so they are better off using the resources to do what? To produce T-shirts. However, country Y, it's more costly for them. If they want to produce one T-shirt, they have to give up 15 pairs of socks, which is much more expensive for them. So country X should produce T-shirts. Let's take a look at another example. Suppose an opportunity cost ratio, which is what's the ratio? X over Y, X over Y. For oranges and olives is four tons of oranges for one ton of olives in Spain. So in Spain, what's going to happen is this. If they want to produce one ton of oranges, they have one, sorry, one ton of olives. They have to give up four tons of oranges. In Spain, but in Italy, the ratio is they have to give up only one ton of orange to produce two tons of olives. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing olives? So we're looking at olives. Well, guess what? We know in Spain they have to give up four tons of oranges to produce one ton of olives. In Italy, well, what we have to do is we have to basically turn this two tons of olives into one. What do I do? I divide both sides by two. Now it's going to be one half tons of orange, give up, and we can produce one ton of olives. What I divided both sides by two. What does that mean? It means in Italy, they only have to give up half a pound of oranges to produce one ton of olives. What should they do? Who has the comparative advantage in producing olives? Italy has a lower cost, opportunity cost. Because all what they have to do is give up half. It's not that expensive for them. In Spain, if they want to produce one ton of olives, they have to give up four tons of oranges. They should not do that. It's cheaper for them to buy the olives from Italy because the Italians are going to say, well, we only have to give up half relative to Spain. And Spain should maybe produce oranges and sell the oranges and do the exchange that way. I mean, comparative advantage, there's much, much more calculation involved in it. But the point is for the CPA exam is know what does it mean? Comparative advantage means you can produce something using your resources and wherever you are given an opportunity cost is not as expensive. You are using the lowest, the lowest opportunity cost, lower opportunity cost. That's what you should produce. Another reason why companies operate overseas is to extend their life cycle. Typically, any product goes through four life cycles. They have an introduction, then growth, then the then growth, then it reaches maturity. Then the product will decline. So each stage, obviously, present unique challenges and opportunity. Now the key for any company is to extend this growth as much as possible. Keep extending the growth. So during the introduction phase, companies may focus on domestic market first to test the products. Is it working, fix the tweaks, so on and so forth. As the product entered the growth phase, it means while we are selling the product, everybody wants the product, they will expand internationally to increase the demand. You enter a new market. So this expansion allows companies to extend the product's life cycle and generate additional revenue. Why? Because you are tapping into a larger customer base. And you want to keep this going up as high as possible, but at some point any product would reach a peak, then they will start to decline. This strategy allows businesses to reduce dependence on a single market and to diversify your revenue. And this is going to be another benefit, basically diversifying your risk. And it's going to be its own benefit. For example, when the smartphone, first smartphone came out, the Apple, they only introduced it in the US. Kind of tested it, make sure it's working properly. Same thing with Samsung. They introduced it in South Korea. Then they expand internationally. Same thing with multi-fast food chains. They started in the US. And what they did, once they said, well, we're doing great, but now we're all over the US. We no longer can sell because we have a McDonald and every single town in city. Well, what do we do? We expand internationally to increase that growth. International business will give you access to resources. They provide you access to essential resources such as material, labor, technology or expertise. Companies will establish operation in countries where those resources are abundant and most importantly cost effective. They are cheap. Lower cost. For example, automobile manufacturers like Toyota and BMW have set up facilities in countries like Mexico and China to take advantage of the low labor cost and be close to their suppliers if they are this way you save money. Saving money is the number one reason usually why companies operate internationally. Cost savings are a significant driver for international operation. Companies might establish manufacturing or service facilities in countries with lower production costs. You might be saying cost reduction and access to resources that are interrelated. Of course, they all feed on each other, including labor taxes or regulation. They just give you benefits when you operate in certain countries. This enabled them to achieve economies of scale, reduce production costs and enhance profitability when you reduce costs. Profit goes up. Apparel companies, they are notorious for that like Nike and Adidas, outsourced their manufacturing operation to places like Vietnam and Bangladesh where labor costs are relatively lower. Even in these countries, labor cost is now relatively cheaper than China. First, they moved to China. Once the Chinese rate started to go up, they just left to China, went to countries where they can manufacture at a lower cost. This is what you do. You follow the money. Where can you save money? Technology and innovation, notice they all feed on each other. International operation can facilitate this access to advanced technology, research and development capabilities and innovation hubs. Many, many of them are set up in India these days. Companies may establish R&D centers or collaborate with foreign partners. We're going to see in the next session how can you collaborate to gain access to cutting-edge technologies and faster innovation. For example, companies like Google, Microsoft, they establish research centers in various countries, especially Asian countries and specifically India, to tab into the local talent and drive technological advancement. Risk diversification. Again, you want to diversify your sources of revenue. When you expand into international market, you can diversify your business risk because by operating in multiple countries, businesses can mitigate the economic impact fluctuation between countries. So if there's one country you're not doing good, maybe the other country is doing better. You don't want to concentrate only in one country. So when the market condition changes in one country, well, at least you're doing well in another market. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, Novartis have presence in multiple countries. The reason is to reduce their exposure to specific regulatory changes or patent expiration in a single market. Also, you want to expand overseas to increase your strategic alliances and partnership. Enable companies to form strategic alliances, joint ventures and partnership. Again, this collaboration will give you access to local market knowledge, distribution network. In some countries, you cannot do a business unless you have a strategic alliance or a partner. Like if you want to start a business in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, you need a local partner. You could share resources, faster growth and enhance competitiveness when you do that. For instance, a good example will be automotive companies like Renault, France and Nissan in Japan have formed a strategic alliance to share technology, manufacturing facility and market reach. And if you're not aware of this, their CEO got into trouble, Gusen. So if you don't know anything about this, there is a show on Netflix. Actually, the guy is originally from Lebanon. Now he's a fugitive in Lebanon. He escaped from Japan. He escaped from prosecution and went to Lebanon where he cannot be extradited because he has Lebanese citizenship. He was born in Lebanon, but he's the person that formed the alliance between Renault and Nissan. It's a very interesting story. If you have time, check it out on Netflix. Imperfect markets. Imperfect markets refer to situations where there are barriers to trade, tariffs, quotas, trade restriction, cultural differences. And you cannot sell overseas. So what do you do? Just go there. When a company faces limited opportunities or attends competition in their domestic market due to various barriers or they may seek to enter international market to expand their imperfect market. Imperfect market refers to situations where there are barriers to trade, tariffs, quotas, trade restriction or cultural differences. So when you are faced with imperfect market, you cannot really reach your maximum. You face limited opportunities or intense competition in your domestic market due to various barriers. You may seek to enter international market to expand your customer base and increase profitability. For example, if a country imposes high import tariffs on a specific product, it can create an opportunity for a foreign company to establish local operation. So what you do? They cannot allow you to bring this stuff in. Guess what? Go there and produce it there and produce the product within the country to avoid tariffs. Now, usually, usually, if they have import, they're also these countries, they're also on the lookout to tax you or to create more difficulties for you. If they don't want you to sell your product there. And in some countries, they put tariffs on purpose.  So basically, because the market is imperfect, it was a perfect market. Everyone sell into everyone. You don't have to, you know, you don't have to move there. But if it's imperfect market, you just have to go through it this way. This approach allow companies to gain a competitive advantage. It might allow it over domestic companies that face higher production costs. That could be the case. But it also could be the opposite. If that government don't like foreigners to be operating there, they might might your life is harder. So that's why we have an imperfect market and we'll try to go around it. International trade could solve part of it. What should you do now? Go to forehead lectures and practice MCQs about topics. If you're studying for your CPA exam, invest in yourself. Good luck. Study hard and stay safe.


What's up, everyone? My name is Alex. I'm one of the co-founders of MyInvestingClub.com and I want to let you guys know about something special we're doing for our viewers on YouTube. So the most common question we get asked is, you know, how do I start day trading? So what me and my mentor about it is we create a free two-hour mentorship course for the brand new trader. It's going to be available at MyInvestingClub.co. The link is going to be right here. This is a free webinar that reveals our 12 secrets that every single brand new day trader should know before they start. I also want to let you guys know about something that's very unique to MIC. So if you have any questions about trading or you're curious about trading or you don't know if MIC is the right fit for you, now you can text our head mentor, Tosh, whose number is going to be right here and he'll answer all the questions that you have in less than 24 hours. Thank you and enjoy the video. Good morning, guys. It's Tom Diesel here. I hope you guys had a great weekend. Today I'm just going to go over quick, you know, video discussing really about how to add to the winner and also being open-minded while, you know, trading. So I'm just going to keep this, you know, really short and sweet because I think most of this I've been go over with Aloha on his webinar on Thursday. I'm just going to basically do my trade recap on that. That's all. On Friday, I really did focus on BA only at the open. It was kind of my main priority to trade on that because it was like a first red day. And I believe, yeah, the red was 180. Yeah, this previous close. So I was basically aiming to, you know, risk over this level in the pre-market. But as soon as it tanks, right, I have here the executions. Yeah, I showed it some at 173. The reason is that why, because, you know, I had a big wash here. As you can see here, this broke the support, right? So, you know, in the pre-market. So that's why I went ahead and, you know, showed it some up right here. Yeah, it doesn't show here in the trade review. They don't show in the pre-market trading. So I basically showed it some here and then quickly cover the wash at the open.  So that's why I shot it right back. The pops basically, you know, it's just risking over this view. It was this one right here. I think I shorted this pop and once it couldn't break the view app, you know, I decided to add a little bit more here. And this is really the confirmation for me to add more size. But, you know, I should have stuck to my plan. And, you know, I drew a line that was like 158 on the pivot.  I mean, it will never be, you know, perfect. Anyway, you know, and that's something I need to work on every day for myself as well. Like try to focus more on my my process and not a PNL. And at this point, I was up really nicely.  And I ended up cover everything. So I really need to work on that. This is something that I'm still struggling every day. But, you know, right after being missed that much, it was like almost 10 points here. But it doesn't mean that I can chase down here, right? So I didn't chase at all. But I was waiting for a pop into the I think it was to view app as well. Yeah, this one right here, 183. And that was basically my that I was waiting for. And right after that, you know, I got a quick exit. I waited. I was patiently waiting for for the pop and, you know, I got some and, you know, cover right on the dip and be done with it. And so that was a V8 trade. And the one that I really want to talk about today is BKOWI, BKYI. Yeah, this is the one. Like in the morning, I have absolutely no interest in shorting that. As you can see here, yeah, I have a chart here. Yeah, as you can see in the morning, I have no interest shorting this. It was like really strong, you know, it was like holding very well. The trend is really intact in the morning. You know, they held very well in overview app and, you know, and so I had absolutely no reason shorting this in the pre market. I mean, you could scout the channel here, but 2.4, I think to like 2.1.  Yeah, but if that's something you, you know, you've been good at, and you could do that as well. But the trade for me was when it's like approaching zombie stock did kind of, you know, they have a view app. I saw like 180 was the support right here. So I mean, that's why I long some here. But basically risking just like 1.7 is like 10 cents.  And then when it's like grinding higher added more. So it's some right here. And but when it broke this line, this, you know, a tool. And I think it was reclaimed view app right here. So it gave me to come on, you know, more confidence to put more size on.    But you never know, right? I had a plan and, you know, it's my target. And I'm pretty happy with that. So this, this really nothing for me to regret about this trade.  And so basically after that zombie, you know, zombie time, I think it was around here, it's like, it was like perfect. Right. You can use that to your advantage. So that's really something I really want to share here because you need to have, you know, an open-minded regarding the trade. You know, Tran is your friend, right? Tran is still intact.   Yeah, that's fine. But you have to see, like, you know, the Tran is still intact. You have to be careful on that. I mean, you know, I think the proper risk management is something that you need to have on this type of play. And you have to be okay with being wrong, right? If you shorting this, you know that, you know, you know, likely high chance is going to pop back or like pop high here. It's like all here is like people covering, like shorting down, down this low. And then, you know, the panic and covering into this high. And so that was my thesis, right? My thesis was here, probably going to trap more people and probably they're going to end up like covering everything here. Yeah, but I made some here, but, you know, that was my thesis. And, you know, it worked very well. So I'm happy with that. But, you know, if wrong, you know, I have my starter here and I would stop out at 1.7, you know, and be done with it. So there's really, it's really about how to manage your risk management. That's all. I don't know if the stock is going to pop or not.  Tran is my friend. I'm going to follow the trend until it proven, you know, it proves me otherwise. And in this case, in the afternoon, right? After this line broke, it gave me the confirmation, right? Like the back side is really in now. And the death line, you know, something we teach in the MIC. This is the one. All right. So that's why, you know, as soon as it broke this, you know, I got some here popped back to this 180 line. I mean, my risk was like a little bit over, I think 183, something like that. Yeah, this is what's the line. And my risk was over like 1.8 something. It was like 10 cents.  It's like the same thing we talk about in the webinar with Austin. Like if it pops too much, likely it won't hit my target, right? So there's no point for me to be in that trade. So I just want to use it like a halfway. I got in here, a stock couldn't bounce, you know, was weak and added some more on the way down and quickly cover some added some here. As you can see the ad, this is how you add to the winner, right? Broke this support, you got to sell some, add it back.  Yeah, I'm going to be out of the trade. I think it was break even point was right here. All right, guys, so hope you enjoyed the video and have a great weekend. And I see you on the next one. Take care. Thank you so much for watching our video. You want to see more of our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel by clicking the button here. We do our best to post a new video every single day. If you have any questions about MIC or any general trade questions, please text us using the number here. Also, stay up to date by watching some of our most recent videos right over here.


The best kind of doors are the doors you have to explain. Welcome to Unhinge with the DoorDork where door hardware nerds get together. We knock, we slam and on different door fills, poor installs, code violations, all of the above. We learn, we laugh. Sometimes we even cry because it's so bad. But most importantly, we have fun while we dork out on doors, you know? Today we have a very special guest, Mr. Kevin Waring, formerly with Norton Rickson, but now he's making a little transition here, but I'll let him introduce himself and tell us a little fun fact today. Yeah, great. Thanks, Benji, appreciate it. Happy to be here. So Kevin Waring, I am now the director of business development for the Yale commercial team. Been on the Oslo Avoli team for the past five years. In fact, on the 24th of July was my fifth year. Started with Norton and Rickson for the first five and have now transitioned into the Yale. So part of a great team, part of a great family here and absolutely love it. And in regards to a fun fact, I thought maybe I might capitalize on the fact that Mia has NASCAR that runs into her blood, literally. So I thought maybe sharing a fun NASCAR fact would be good because some of you may know that I do like to drive a little bit fast every now and then, but I was fortunate enough on three different occasions to drive both my personal vehicle as well as a NASCAR vehicle at the Pocono Long Pond Speedway. So it was an awesome blast. And I hit 172 miles an hour in a Ford NASCAR, so. Man, that is crazy. That's fast. I could not imagine going that fast in a car, but if you're in the right condition, why not? It was a rush. It was a thrill, awesome. I would love to do it again in a heartbeat. So my personal vehicle, I did not get that fast, but I did exceed 100 miles an hour in my personal vehicle. So. I think once when I was young and a little bit more reckless, I drove my mom's minivan and I pushed it over a hundred. So that was pretty impressive for back in the day, I think, but. I will say though, now that I have three kids, don't know that I'd push it to that envelope any further, but it was great to do pre-kids. All right, well, welcome, Kevin. We are so happy to have you on the show. If you know her, you love her. Mrs. Mia Merrell, why don't you hop on and say hi and let's share another fun fact. Yeah, hello. Welcome to this episode of Unhinged. And welcome, Kevin. Kevin and I work on the same team at ASSA Abloy. So friends, coworkers. We're located far apart though. We don't work in the same state. So my fun fact for today. So I'm actually in the office today, not working from home, but our house we bought a little over two years ago and I was recently looking for a spare key to leave for someone because we were on vacation as you all remember from the pictures. But I found a key and I'm not gonna show my bidding because I know this industry. But a key was, I guess our house was rekeyed by Rackliff block, which is a local locksmith in the area that I live. And I know Rick, the owner is a fan of the channel. So I thought I would give a shout out to Rick and the Rackliff crew. So I thought that was really fun. I know that Rick has been watching and he actually was one of the winners from the giveaway this past month for our one year anniversary. Nice, nice. What goes around comes around. I love it. All right, Benji, what's your fun fact? My turn. Well, I definitely don't have a cool NASCAR store like Kevin but so a lot of people ask if I collect old hardware or like historic hardware or door hardware. And I think if I did, it would take over my whole place. Like it would be too much. So I had to put a limit to keys. So I do collect old keys, very cool skeleton keys, just keys in general. So if you ever have any fun, cool, old looking keys, let me know. But I do collect them. I've got some that are like hung up in some mantles but here are some old Yale. There's an old Corbin on here and even a Sargent as well. So yeah, send keys because they're a lot smaller than door closers. Okay, so for those who don't know how unhinged works and again, I don't, I guess I didn't say this but I apologize for my voice. I'm just getting back from the SEA Accelerize conference and my voice is completely shot. I think just, as Kevin said earlier, singing along too loud to the country music. Was that the cup you stole? Yes, yes. Fun fact, this is the cup that I accidentally stole that I'm actually very embarrassed about but it turned into like a great thing and like it was like a recurring joke. I kept on showing up each day with the cup and it's fun now and I'll bring it to next year's Accelerize. So look forward. You can return it. For those who don't know how unhinged works, I will share my screen of three different door, fails, installs, something wrong, code violations. We'll give it a knocking score. One being not too knocking bad, 10 being very knocking bad, call the AHA, let's report this, let's get this taken care of because something is terribly wrong and people are in danger because of this. And since I just got back from Austin, as people know when I'm out and about traveling, I like to go door hunting as what I call it. I'm hunting for doors. And I found a couple of gems that I want to share with you guys today. How does that sound? You guys ready? Let's do it. Yeah, absolutely. Kevin, I don't know if you're ready. Are you ready? I'm waiting for it. I'm excited. Are you sure? I'm ready. Let's do it. I just do most people not know that you need to put a key into a lock. At least it's well, well visual. I mean. Oh yeah. No, that's very bright, vibrant. You know, that's clarifying like exactly what you're supposed to do with this door. Where were they putting the key? I don't want to know, Mia. I don't want to know. Well, and I'm curious why such a huge plate to cover that? What were they covering up before? Yeah, no, that makes me concerned what was there before. Maybe that's where like a deadbolt was or something and they just added that to cover it up. Yeah, I mean, you can tell that there's a number of screw holes on that door. So this door has been repurposed a number of times. Yeah. And I think towards when you get towards the middle. Yeah. Yeah, there you go. Yeah. Yeah, I missed that one. That one. But yeah, I want to know where they were trying to put it that we need this. And like that's like an official sign also. Like they spent some good amount of money. That's like the thick like plastic signs that like the sticky back adhesive back, right? You know how when you're like taking a test and the question is like so simple that you're like, I'm missing something. Like it's too simple that I missed. I like you start over complicating it. Like I'd be looking at this going, what am I missing? I'm supposed to be putting my key somewhere else. That's the first thing I thought too. Almost like you're looking for the hotel key card that the mag slot to go into. Yeah, I wonder if they had some kind of other setup. Maybe it was an access system set up on that door that they took off and now they're just retraining the people how to use the door or I don't know. Be sad if they took the step backwards to go from access to mechanical and couldn't see that. I want to know what it looks like under that scar plate since you can see that there's been at least like two or three other scar plates.  Yeah, maybe the sign is for the integrity of the door. It's just that's the only thing that's holding it together. It's like a bandit. Maybe they just took a deadbolt off and they didn't want to put another scar plate on because they would have had to take off the whole lock. Oh, that's that's what it's got to be. Which means it's not fire compliant. Not that wood doors are really super fire compliant. They're like what 20 minutes, but there could be a gaping hole under there. Probably not fire compliant with all these holes either in it. I know I know the four inch diameter, but I think those stuff to be filled in. Okay, not too knocking bad, but I thought it was just kind of funny. What do you guys think you want to give it a knocking score? I think I would throw it out there at a three. I mean, it's it's interesting, but I don't think this is AJ worthy or being nice to have a conversation with their facilities manager on this one. Yeah, I'm in like the three range too, because let's just say they're retraining. Then it's actually pretty low, right? It's like they probably should have replaced the door by now, but it's still functioning. But if they've just put that there to cover up a gaping hole, then I think it's actually higher. So we'll stay at three because more information needed. I agree. I agree. Not too knocking bad. Let's jump into the next one if you guys are ready. If you want to be featured on a future episode of Unhinged, or you have a picture to submit, leave a comment down below.


So let us continue with the double C i. So yesterday we did for the monomer hydrogen molecule. So I hope you remember that we derived the form for the E correlation as E correlation in terms of E correlation itself. That was important to remember. So we had E correlation equal to k12 square. Is that what we derived? E correlation minus 2 delta. So if you solve this equation, it is a quadratic equation. I hope some of you have solved this equation. So E correlation is equal to, has anybody solved it? Quadratic equation, very simple solution. It is delta minus delta square, plus k12 square to the power half. So that is the result of the solution of the quadratic equation. But 2 delta, remember 2 delta was the, what was 2 delta? I remind you, 2 delta was the diagonal element of the 2 2 bar H minus E Hartree form, which is basically the W excited amplitude, W excited configuration, sorry, on this side and W excited configuration on this side. That was your 2 delta. So delta is half of this, what is used here? And if you remember, we first obtained E correlation as C times k12, where C was the coefficient for the W excited return. So our, so it was 1 1 bar plus C 2 2 bar. Note again, what we are discussing hydrogen molecule in minimal basis. So this is what is called hydrogen molecule in minimal basis. Minimal basis means there are only two orbitals. That is exactly what you have learned, sigma G and sigma U. Remember when you do MO theory, you have 1 SA and 1 SB, two atomic orbitals, LCAO, it gives you sigma G and sigma U. So you have two atomic orbitals to start with, you do a Hartree Fock, you get two molecular orbitals. So this is what we are calling 1, this is what we are calling 2. So 1 is the bonding molecular orbital sigma G and 2 is the anti-bonding sigma U. So your Hartree Fock is this. So this is your Hartree Fock which is 1 1 bar and your DCI determinant will be 2 2 bar. So that is exactly, so it is a very simple problem that we are doing beyond Hartree Fock when you do DCI. So our wave function then is 1 1 bar plus a constant times 2 2 bar. So this is my Hartree Fock. So 2 2 bar is the other configuration which I am doing. So now we have to calculate C and put it back, E correlation is C times K12, put it back here. So this is the result that you get. So that is what we showed last time. I did a solution for C, remember the double CI equation. So what we want to show, what happens to the two hydrogen molecules now? So now this is for a single hydrogen molecule, two hydrogen molecules which are far apart. So we are discussing the case of a non-interacting dimer. So we are again doing a DCI, DCI in the minimal basis. So for each hydrogen molecule I have two molecular orbitals, 1 and 2 which I am calling as sigma G. So now what I will do is to rewrite this diagram saying that this is hydrogen 1A, hydrogen this is 2A. So this is for the H2 molecule which I am calling molecule A. Actually they are same hydrogen molecule but just to distinguish the coordinates will be different. So I am calling molecule A and then similarly for H2B I will have 1B and 2B. At a non-interacting regime their energies will be exactly identical. So they are degenerate at a non-interacting regime. Now I am doing a Hartree Fock. First at everything that I am doing is for the non-interacting regime. I am not discussing what happens when these two hydrogen molecules come apart. Of course then there will be interaction between these and they will be shift. They will no longer remain degenerate. So I will have two molecular orbitals. They will have different results. But at the non-interacting regime the Hartree Fock is very simple. Two electrons here, two electrons here. You agree? It is H4 system. So four electrons in 1A and 1B. So this will be the Hartree Fock for the dimer. So psi Hartree Fock will be 1A, 1A bar, 1B, 1B bar. Remember of course everything is a determinant. I am just writing the diagram. So again I have already explained that whenever I am writing without bar it means alpha spin orbital is attached. If I am writing with bar beta spin orbital is attached. 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B are spatial orbitals per se. But when I am using them inside the determinant they have an alpha and beta attached because determinants cannot be written in terms of spatial orbitals. It has to be always in terms of spin orbitals. So that is my psi Hartree Fock. Now I have to discuss what is the doubly excited configuration. How many doubly excited configurations are possible? So now start thinking. So these two electrons can of course be excited here. That is one or these two electrons can be excited here. These two electrons can be excited here. These two electrons can be excited here or one can go there and etc. But first let us understand that since they are non-interacting any interaction between a dimer, between a monomer A and B is actually going to become 0 because if you calculate the integral, the integral will become 0. So physically one can actually rigorously show but I have physically you understand that I cannot push an electron from here to there because they are infinitely apart. So the only possibilities are actually the interaction here and interaction here. So what is now my total wave function phi 0? 1a, 1a bar, 1b, 1b bar. Again I am writing in the intermediate normalization. So this is the Hartree Fock. I told you 4 electron Hartree Fock plus this gets excited here but this remains here because it is only doubly excited. So then this will become 1, 2a, 2a bar, 1b, 1b bar coefficient C. We can say C1 plus C2. Then I push this here, this remain here. So 1a, 1a bar, 2b, 2b bar period. These are the only two doubly excited configurations that are possible because anything else will include excitations from here and there. There is possibility of one here and one here but we are talking of a wave function which is totally singlet. So that is the reason we are eliminating that and we are doing DCI anyway. So singlet, singlet. So that is the reason we are not considering this. That will count as DCI but not DCI for the monomer. Not DCI for the monomer but DCI for the dimer. So if you are considering only the singlet function this is all that you will have. So this is a special case but it is alright. For all discussion this is okay because that is actually going to complicate the matter even more if I take a singles here, singles here. Yes, it does not matter but finally yeah but finally if you look at H4 it is doubly excited. I am looking at H4. And the reference to 1a, 1a bar, 1b, 1b bar. So we restrict up to here because the discussion is very clean here. Even before I actually do the calculation first I can recognize one important fact that the C1 must be equal to C2 by symmetry. Point that we are trying to say that size consistency means when the systems are very far apart the energy should be some. Whether what is the linear combination? Yeah that is okay. I am not exciting between A and B. Excitation here that is okay. That is not a problem. Overall system exists Hamiltonian exists. The point that I am trying to say if I solve a DCI for that Hamiltonian it should be twice the DCI energy of the monomer which is not the case. That is what I will show. So that is the reason DCI is not a size consistent method. Any size I yesterday I told any size consistent method must give this result that if you have A and B if I calculate the energy when A and B are far apart the result should be energy of A plus energy of B. That is physically intuitive and correct but I will show that the DCI does not give this whereas Hartree-Fock for this system will give actually that is very easy to see. So let me go ahead. See without even doing the calculation you can actually show that C1 is equal to C2 because of symmetry because both the hydrogen molecules are identical both of them are hydrogen. So there is no reason to distinguish between this determinant and this determinant. It is just either on this hydrogen or this hydrogen. There is no interaction between them anyway. So actually C1 would be equal to C2 and then I can set up the CI matrix just as we have done it. So first one is 0. Then I will have Hartree-Fock with one of the WXR8 configures in this row if you remember. So what will be that? So I have 1A, 1A bar, 2A, 2A bar, H then any one of the determinant you take. Let us say 2A, 2A bar, sorry 1B, 1B bar. Then I say 2A, 2A bar, 1B, 1B bar. So I am exciting this. So this will be one of the elements here. You remember the elements how to write Hartree-Fock with all WXR8 configuration in row and column. What is the matrix element for this? Remember this is again one determinant with another determinant where two of them are different. So only those two will come. So it will become 1A, 1A bar, anti-symmetrize, 2A, 2A bar. If you now remember we exactly encountered the same one for the monomer except that time we did not call A, just call 1, 1 bar, 2, 2 bar, anti-symmetrize. We did spin integration. One of these survived, one did not survive. The one that survived was 1, 1, 2, 2 in special orbitals which is just 1, 1, 2, 2. Either A or B does not matter now and that was called K1, 2. So that is exactly what is going to come here, 0, K1, 2 and this one is automatically K1, 2. I do not have to do it again. When I do the other one, 1A, 1A bar is identical. Again it is 2B, 2B bar. So I will get exactly the same integral just as the same integral as the monomer. So I can fill the column, first column K1, 2, K1, 2 and then you have 2 delta, 2 delta. That is also very easy to see because if I calculate these integral between the two of the determinants which are actually identical determinants like this, like I did here, 2, 2 bar H minus E Hartree-Fock. I am doing exactly the similar calculation here. So I will get exactly the same result as 2 delta and then you will have some numbers. This is Hartree-Fock. This is one of the doubles. So doubles with itself and doubles with the other doubles. So that means now I have to take this and this. Quite clearly this is 0. I hope you can see this because 2A, 2A bar, 1B, 1B bar, 1A, 1A bar, 2B to all four spin orbitals are different between these two determinants. So between one of the WXRA determinants to the another WXRA determinants, the matrix element is 0 because I have already told that if you have more than two occupation difference, Slater rule says it is 0. Is it clear to all? So this is the one of the WXRA row. So the first one is K1, 2 with Hartree-Fock. One with itself is 2 delta and then matrix element with the other one. So it is a 3 by 3 matrix. Now this is going to become 0. This is also going to become 0, same way. So this is my Hamiltonian matrix for this and then I will have 1 CC. Actually you can write C1, C2 and show that C1 is equal to C2 because you will get identical equation. In fact I have assumed it but please remember if I ask you to show you should be able to show that assume C1 and C2 are different, you will get exactly identical equation for C1 and C2. So they have to be equal but anyway I know this. So I am just kind of doing a shortcut. So E correlation, 1 CC. Remember now there are three determinants. So there will be two 1 CC. So these are the matrix and these are the coefficients 1, C1, C2 which are equal. So I have written 1 CC. If you do not assume equal anyway they will come equal, no problem. So if I now do the same multiplication, exactly the same way instead of diagonalizing by Cramer's rule let me write it down. So again 0 into 1, K1 into C, K1 into 2 into C. So I have got 2. So what is my E correlation? E correlation is 2 times K1 into C. Beautiful. If you remember here for the monomer, let me highlight for the monomer it was E correlation C times K1 into 2 and here the E correlation is 2 times K1 into C. This looks beautiful actually. So just from here you would argue that this is alright, this is size consistent except that we do not know the value of C yet. If the value of C is identical to here then of course it is size consistent. But this will be a different C because I am solving a different problem. I only assume that the C1 is equal to C2 but I cannot assume that the C is same as this C. So I have to actually calculate the C. So we will go to the next equation to calculate the C. So second equation, any one of the equation I will take K1 into 1 plus 2 delta into C, K1 into plus 2 delta into C equal to E correlation times C. So K1 into 1 plus 2 delta into C, 0 into C equal to E correlation times C and of course the other one will be exactly identical 2 delta C equal to E correlation C. So I can actually calculate from here again the value of C and put it back there. So your C would be K1 into 2 divided by E correlation minus 2 delta. So your equation here would become then E correlation equal to 2 times K1 into square divided by E correlation minus 2 delta just as I did here. It is exactly same except that it has been multiplied by 2. So you think everything is still fine except that now if you iterate and convert the equation, quadratic equation solutions will be different. Solutions will not give you 2 times this. See this E correlation looks 2 times K1 into square by E correlation minus 2 delta. Here also you have E correlation equal to K1 into square divided by E correlation minus 2 delta but unfortunately the result of E correlation will be different. Just solve this quadratic equation then you will see what you will get. So let me solve this quadratic equation and the solution of this quadratic equation will give you just like there E correlation equal to delta not here delta minus delta square plus 2 K1 into square to the power half. Unfortunately these 2 will actually come here inside the square root that means this is no longer equal to 2 times this. 2 has come inside the square root instead of multiplying by the whole thing. Although the iterative equation looks that it is still 2 times. The coefficient is identical, E correlation is exactly 2 times but however the result when I put it back because C is dependent on E correlation that is the problem here. So to say that this C is identical to that C is actually wrong. The form is only identical. The actual value is no longer identical because the E correlation is different. I do not know this. I know this only after I substitute here and then solve the quadratic equation I will get a different equation. So I will just kind of now rewrite all the equations in one place. So this is the monomer. So what we have got now is the for the dimer the result is the following that I get still first result is E correlation is equal to 2 times K1 to C and C equal to exactly the same result that we got here K1 to divided by E correlation minus 2. Note this equation and this equation with the equation here and I have not written the C here but C is exactly same here. So I can write the C here K1 to by E correlation minus 2. Note that everything looks identical at this point. Everything looks identical that it is just 2 times because C looks identical to this. However when I substitute this I get E correlation equal to now instead of K1 to square C I get 2 times K1 to square C that is the only difference divided by E correlation minus 2. Note that if this E correlation was not here something else was here which is the constant this should have been actually 2 times but because of the fact that the E correlation depends on E correlation I have to make an iterative solution and the result of the iterative solution gives me completely so if you solve the quadratic equation and this will give you E correlation equal to delta minus delta square plus 2 K1 to square to be power half. Please do this quadratic equation solution yourself. You will see that the result is not 2 times this. However everything looks 2 times this monomer result. If you look at the monomer and the dimmer everything looks 2 times still now except when I convert this I get a different result and that is essentially the problem of DCI that the 2 comes in but it does not come in as a multiplying factor here but it actually comes in inside the square root and hence the correlation energy is not 2 times the correlation energy of the monomer. Obviously you agree that that value is not 2 times this in fact it is close to square root 2 times if at all if I expand this properly because of the square root. So this is a very subtle point because in the beginning people did not realize because the forms looked exactly identical even the coefficient is same provided this correlation energy is identical. So you put it back here looks alright still it looks alright till you actually iterate and this is the real problem of all the linear expansion and the mathematics is very interesting actually what you get and till you actually converge you cannot put any bet with everything depends on this guy. When I converge I get this different which means C is actually different coefficient is actually different everything is different. So that is the message that the correlation energy is not size consistent. So essentially I can say that for DCI correlation energy is not size consistent I hope all of you have got this if you are not convinced you can do C1 and C2 you will see you will get identical equation for C. So the exactly same equation you will get for the C. So that you can anyway do it yes I am going to make that comment so true. So the problem has come because of linear expansion unless it is a full CI in fact the same problem I can now solve in full CI which means for monomer I take only doubles for dimer I take up to quadruples let us say only doubles and quadruples forget about the rest of the singles and triples which will actually generate more than the singlet functions then you will see identical results. So only for full CI energy will exactly in fact there is another exercise to show that they do a DQCI for this and show that now the energy is exactly twice the monomer energy the reason is that the full CI is exact. So very simply to understand all exact theories must be size consistent because that is what it is otherwise there is no point doing theory if my exact theory also is not size consistent then the theory is wrong I am not even I am not even theorizing correctly right my theory itself is wrong structure is wrong but here it is simply coming because it is not an exact theory for monomer it may be exact but for dimer it is not exact and I will show you what is missing now why it is not exact yes yeah but it does not matter it will make more complication that will essentially mean that there will be more terms here. So that will not help I mean I have I can I mean here I am not taking singles anyway and here you are going to take two singles amplitude that will even make more complication there will be another set of coefficients so there is no way gold energy will become too tight. So essentially the result that we are saying is that so the result that we have reached is that DCI is not size consistent that is important. So I have these two results in front of you this this and finally this or this so as you can see that this is not two times this presumably when the energy is not two times the monomer the wave function will also not be a product obviously so now I am going to physically show why the wave function is not product I have not discussed the wave function directly except that I wrote DCI wave function so again I go back to the same diagram that I did 1A 2A 1B 2B I write the monomer phi 0 monomer let me call it 1 this 1 is just to indicate that it is for the monomer 1 one mark so what is the C I 1A 1A bar plus C 2A 2A bar correct this is for the monomer A I write this for the monomer B what will be the monomer B separately 1B 1B bar plus C 2B 2B bar you agree I have written the C I functions DCI for each of the monomer separately I have to show that when I write the DCI function for the whole in the non-interacting regime it is not a product of this it will not be a product obviously so I am going to show this and it is very easy to see this actually and that is the part of the problem. So when I now write DCI for the monomer DCI for the dimer sorry DCI for the dimer let me call this 2 phi 0 2 means there are 2 N mark 2 mark so it is a dimer of the so 2 phi 0 so what is the result it is 1A 1A bar 1B 1B bar plus some coefficient C or K this may be different let us say C 1 1A 1A bar 2B 2B bar I have excited this plus some C 2 which is same as C 1 now 2A 2A bar 1B 1B bar so that is exactly the C I wrote I just wanted to distinguish between this C and this C that is all because they are actually not same I know this. So now what I have to show is that this wave function is not the product of this wave function and that is the reason it is not size consistent because energy is should be some wave function should be product so we will take a product of these 2 functions. So let me now do 1 phi 0A into 1 phi 0B now remember when I am taking the product it should be anti-symmetrize product which means the entire product should be anti-symmetrize so that is a simple thing you do not have to worry what is that A so all I have to take is this into this in an anti-symmetrize manner so what is the first term this into this what will that give me that will give me the 4 electron determinant 1A 1A bar right and 1B 1B bar so essentially I am taking the product of the 2 dimer heart reform so that will be generate me a 4 electron heart reform after anti-symmetrize then I take a product of this into this so I will get 1A 1A bar with a coefficient 1A 1A bar and then 2B 2B bar which is actually one of my WXRA determinant and then I will get another C of the other one 1B 1B bar 2A 2A bar which is the other WXRA determinant at least the determinants have come the coefficients are different but then very importantly there is a fourth term which I cannot avoid which is C square remember this 2A 2A bar 2B 2B bar so if you now compare this with the dimer you can quite clearly see why it is no longer can no longer be a product even if C1 is equal to C you will never generate this term this term comes out of a quadruple CI you have to actually it is a 4 electron excitations right you have to excite 2 electrons from here as well as from here and that cannot be done by DCI of dimer because dimer DCI can never generate quadruple excitations so that is a problem so how do I generate this to make a product I must do a quadruple CI here but then again quadruple CI is not good enough because my coefficient has to be square what is the CI? CI is a linear expansion alright just for this particular problem because quadruple's double CI is a full CI you will eventually get exact results if you do a DQCI here but if you take let us say 10 hydrogen molecules then DQCI is also approximate so at no point of time if you have a n number of H2 non-interacting molecules any approximate CI will be size inconsistent because of this fact that you can never generate the C square term and whatever level you truncate here and whatever level you truncate here cannot be same because product term always contains higher excitations so there are two problems one is that the degree of excitations is different second is that the coefficients come non-linearly so there are two essentially two different problems so we actually see that the wave function of the dimer is not an anti-symmetrized product for this hydrogen molecule so two important reason that we understand here is that so let me write specifically DCI so what is the two reasons one is that product of the monomer contains a quadruple excited configuration remember monomers are done at DCI don't forget the monomers are DCI but when I take their product there is a quadruple excited configuration that's the problem and then the whereas the dimer because I am doing DCI for both so dimer DCI does not have this configuration so basically you if you want to do a CI at the same level of excitations it is always going to have a problem because product will always contains higher level like doubles into doubles is quadruple right so product will always contain higher level so this will become a serious problem further note that the product contains quadruple excited configuration in a non-linear manner I will just make this statement in non-linear manner so you understand what is non-linear because this is c square so the whole spirit of CI anyway will not work if you want the dimer to have the product term of course when I say product term it is a product of the monomer I mean that is understood in the context so this product term contains this quadruple excited configurations and its amplitude is actually c square so if it is c square it cannot even be described by CI because CI describes only linear excitations configurations which are mixed in a linear manner is this clear yes any question if there is any question I mean I mean this is the difficult point but I think you have to understand so the question there later we will have to ask what kind of wave function will achieve this very interestingly perturbation theory achieves this I am not going to make a statement here but mp2 achieves this in a very different way with mp2 you do not first construct wave function you construct the energy and perturbation order and it somehow achieves this that is a beauty about the perturbation but if I think in terms of wave function just like I am thinking in CI that I write wave function as a combination of determinants and then I want to do this it is not working so what kind of strategy will actually lead me to this particular property of size consistency and that is where I will mention that the couple cluster when I come that the couple cluster actually achieves this in a very normal manner because couple cluster is not a linear expansion it is actually an exponential expansion so that is the real reason that it happens and I think I can emphasize this here if I have a linear expansion like 1 plus CA this is CA is very generic monomer A into 1 plus CB that is what is happening 1 is Hartree-Fock C is the WXRA determinant you will get 1 plus CA plus CB plus CA into CB so when I do dimer I am also doing only up to here because it is a linear expansion when I am doing monomer it is a linear expansion but its product has this quadratic term which I am not able to take in the linear expansion so if you think mathematically anything like 1 plus X or 1 plus C will not work what would of course work is the following if I had exponential CA instead of 1 plus CA and an exponential CB instead of 1 plus CB then you can see the product the product is nothing but exponential CA plus CB so if I take an exponential function for this instead of linear an exponential for this and exponential for this where my C is CA plus CB that is no problem but exponential of that then the product rule satisfy that is mathematics so exponential X into exponential Y provided the commute is exponential X plus Y they are numbers no problem but if you have 1 plus X into 1 plus Y that is not 1 plus X plus Y so let us say this is my function in the computer so this would be my function for the monomer dimer X plus Y exponences or if it is 1 plus X is a function this will become 1 plus X plus Y you can quite clearly see that this is not equal because you have additional term which is X into Y so this is actually mathematics so mathematically I know that if I can actually go instead of a linear expansion an exponential expansion exponential is product separable because e to the X e to the Y is e to the X plus Y and this is actually the genesis of the couple cluster method I will come back much later right now I am just making a point here why it does not work for the CI so you can at least appreciate why an exponential will work that is all I wanted to tell you why 1 plus 1 plus C will never work okay so if your dimer has the coefficient which is this plus this then that is the only function that will work but be that as it may right now we come back to CI and just make this point that there are two important points to discuss one is that the product of monomer contains a quadruple excited whereas dimer does not have note that this product term even if I had taken if I would have taken as a linear expansion it would still not have worked because the product term must come with C square so that is why the second noting is also important because the first if you just note this it is passing the buck for the time being okay because even if you had taken in a CI it would still not have worked so that is why I am saying point A is just passing the buck for the time being you are happy why it is but the that but there is a deeper problem all right however let me again mention if for H2 dimer I do DQCI just singlet it is exact and hence for a completely different reason the result will be size consistent okay that point this C square will then be shown to be equal to something because it is a full CI but if I do DQCI for a large number of N H2 molecules then you can see that DQ is also not good enough because if I do DQ for D for all D into D into D into D you will have much more than Q right and then they will come also the nonlinear term so it will never be exact I mean you can do for hydrogen if it is more than hydrogen then it is even worse let's I take two benzene molecule then also the same issue will come up right so either way it becomes very bad and in fact the problem become worse as a two increases to N so if I go from 2 to N when N is very large the problem will actually get worse as you can immediately imagine because there will be many many terms in the product which will be missing not just quadruple now there will be H2 Puli X Tritade, Octopuli X Tritade all will be missing dimer will only have DCI so everything will be missing unless you do again a full CI which is impossible for large N because full CI we can't do so the problem actually gets only worse


It's Ricky Pooj. He's going to LA Galaxy. Can you tell us more about this? It has come as a surprise to some. He was one of the most exciting prospects of Lamassia a few years ago. But he's one of the biggest disappointments in this last year. It had been years since the likes of Tiago, Cesc Fabregas, Iniesta, Busquets, and Chavi had broken through and represented the midfield greatness that Lamassia could create. Ricky's abilities on the pitch brought back the itch of nostalgia for so many Kulays. And, man, I can't blame them for that. Born in Barcelona, Ricardo Pooj, Marti, or Ricky for short, joined Lamassia at 13 years old and rose healthily through the ranks before making his debut for the first team on December 5th, 2018. From that point on, you could hear Pooj's names being shouted from the Raptors at the Camp Nou pretty much every match. That team was severely struggling under Kike Setian, playing incredibly narrow football and just hoping that the likes of Lionel Messi or Ansu Fati could somehow save them and create some greatness and win matches that way. And many times that did work, but fans were still left asking for more, something that they believed Ricky could offer the squad. He was slight, agile, and fantastic on the ball, pretty much everything that we've become accustomed to a good Lamassia talent having. On paper, or at least in the minds of us fans, Ricky could be the difference maker for this team. In the few cameos he made, he was exciting and looked to make things happen. He connected the deep midfield of Raketich and Busquets to the difference makers in the attack, Messi and Suarez. Ricky made quick decisions incredibly well and was about as press resistant of a player as you possibly could have been. During this time, Sess Fabregas came out praising Pooj saying, Ricky can become like Iniesta if coaches trust him. I'm sure he has what it takes to succeed. He just has to have the right attitude and keep improving. However, despite the high praise, he wasn't a perfect player. Kuman criticized him, though indirectly for not working hard enough to improve, to do what Sess said he needed to do. There were also times where the team opened the door for Ricky to leave because he wasn't getting the playing time to gain experience and game time somewhere else where he could make that improvement, but Ricky choose not to. He might've believed that one day he could make it at Barcelona or maybe he just didn't wanna leave his hometown. Either way, he tried to stay and make it happen, but it would never happen for him. See, Ricky, for all the excitement he brought onto the pitch, he was pretty poor off of the ball, both in possession and out of it. His spatial awareness was not at the highest level, often occupying the same space as a teammate or not rotating correctly, and he really struggled to press in any sort of effective way at all. Pooj wasn't necessarily lazy. He tried to press, but he just wasn't good at it at all. And on top of that, versatility wasn't exactly his best trait either. He could really only play one position and that's really not acceptable in today's football. He wanted to play that left interior midfielder in a 4-3-3 or the top of the midfield in a 4-4-2 diamond. That might be okay under some coaches and in some teams if they wanna build around you, but that was never gonna happen for Pooj at Barcelona, especially when they had Lionel Messi. Looking at the young midfielders that have been successful at Barcelona recently, one of the most obvious traits of theirs is their versatility. In the past two years, Gavi has been asked to play as a winger, interior, and at the base of a double pivot, among other positions that I'm sure I'm forgetting. And Pedri is a very similar story. When Chavi came into the squad, his strict positional play needed some versatility from his midfielders, which is why we saw the likes of Pedri and Gavi thrive under him, but the likes of Pooj were forgotten. At this point, it was clear he had to leave Barcelona. Now 22 years old, he either had to get some playing time or his career might have been over. However, instead of going to a lower table Spanish or English club or even a weaker league team like Pais Bay or Benfica, where he could still play Champions League football, he chose to go to the LA Galaxy. That's a very interesting move to say the least. The LA Galaxy is not a good team, doesn't have an interesting project like Inter Miami, and more importantly than anything else, is as far away from European football as it could possibly get. Pooj very easily could have followed in the footsteps of Carlos Alenya and Denis Suarez to lower table sides in La Liga where they could try to prove themselves before, hopefully making a move to a bigger club eventually. But Ricky chose something else, something different. Not to say that one is better than the other, but maybe Pooj just thrived in the spotlight. He loved the attention he got at Barcelona and wanted to get something similar elsewhere. So he went to LA where he could be the guy. When he made the move, I knew the American fans would love him, not only because he was coming from one of the most famous clubs in the world, but because he is a fun and exciting player to watch. He's also a good looking and charismatic guy, someone who could be the face of a franchise here in the United States. And that is exactly what the club tried to do. Just look at the Inter Miami versus LA Galaxy game from a few weeks ago. The headline is Leonel Messi versus Ricky Pooch. In what world would we have ever seen that in Europe? That would have never happened if he went to play for the likes of Hitafe and they faced PSG and some weird friendly. I don't care how well he would have played for Hitafe, his name probably would have been forgotten a little bit and not held at the highest of heights like it is in this match. But in the MLS where they are starved of the very best talent, Ricky Pooch can be that number one guy. However, that doesn't come without trade-offs. Pooch could become like Iniesta one day if he improved. And with the LA Galaxy, he has definitely improved. His final ball is much better. He is a much more progressive passer and is quite a decent finisher as well. But all of this improvement doesn't really matter because I don't think it will be taken seriously by a top European side. It's not like he's Zlatan who already proved himself. Ricky failed in Europe and then he left. I'm not optimistic about the door still being open should he want to move back in the future. He has also not at all improved defensively and a lot of that has to do with the fact that the LA Galaxy don't really give him the responsibility to defend. They were able to build that LA Galaxy team around him, allowing him to really excel at the good things but not have to improve his overall game completely. Because the LA Galaxy weren't a great team and didn't have a ton of prospects when he came, Ricky was basically given the keys to the castle. So I imagine he can play whatever position he wants. He even takes pens for the side and I'm gonna be honest, I've watched a bunch of them. I don't think he's great at taking pens.  Maybe you could argue that his attacking abilities could slide in for a role similar to Odegard's at Arsenal or even maybe KDB's at City but his defensive frailties remain and would keep him out of those sides. In that Inter-Miami match, he was walking alongside Messi for like half of the match. That is unacceptable in top level football unless you are the guy. And that's okay because he is good even though the LA Galaxy isn't great with him in the squad but no top side is gonna ever do that to him and I don't think he's gonna ever want to go to a team where he doesn't have that. I think he probably likes being this idolized public figure. He had it when he was a kid at Barcelona and now he has it in the MLS and should for the next several years if he stays. With his attacking intelligence only getting better and him still only being 24, he has several years ahead of him to be great but I firmly believe that if he stayed in Europe he could have one day played for a pretty solid European side if that's what he had wanted to do and that probably wasn't and it may never be. That makes a little bit of sense too because it's hard to build around a player to find the perfect formula of players and tactics to make that work and sometimes that's okay if you have Lionel Messi being that guy but that's not Ricky Pooch or at least it's not him yet. Now I don't want you to think I'm saying he made the wrong choice. He just made a unique one. Players in Europe very rarely do something like this. We saw with Oscar going to China to make that bag almost immediately in his prime but I think it's being in the spotlight. I think that's what he likes and you know it's hard to speculate exactly on his emotions and his feelings but I think it's telling that he chose to go to the MLS immediately and I think there is a big reason for that and I don't necessarily think it was a sporting one. I think he likes the profile that he has and there's nothing wrong with that. It's just different from what we're used to and I could imagine for a lot of Coulets it's upsetting because we wanted to see him break through at Barcelona but he didn't prove to be that guy or have the ability to pick up that game quick enough. He might have been able to do that if he went to a lower table La Liga side or even went to the Premier League but I don't think that path is in front of him anymore. Now big shout out to the Pierce football. He wrote an article a few years about what happens to Ricky Pooch at Barcelona and I would not have been able to understand so much about him tactically if it weren't for his article. But if you enjoyed this video go check out this one about the hunt for the new face of FC Barcelona. It goes through a wild history of Barcelona trying to find the formula to create the next messy and all their failures leading up to the guy we have now. But thank you for watching and I'll see you in the next one. Peace.


We are trying to, with this product, we are trying to cover quite an interesting model of using NextCloud. We are trying to target normal people, normal users outside the enterprise and educational systems like this university, which have locally stored data at home. And maybe, or trying to establish this, and have no such technical skills like we have. So we are trying to address normal people. What is the traditional architecture of use case that NextCloud supposed? You have a server, and you have desktop clients running at the user site. And you have synchronization. What is the primary purpose of server at all? When you want some things to be shared to anyone, you have to put it on a server. So this is cloud service all about. So when you want something to be shared, you have to put it on a server. And then you share it with NextCloud. But if you want to provide a public service based on NextCloud, from the user point of view, it's not different from the Dropbox or Google Drive, it's the same. So we are trying to implement quite a different model. Providing NextCloud server as application service model, while still keeping user data at user site. Self-hosted. Instead of synchronization, we have implemented our own protocol, which provides access through the net to self-hosted data. And it looks like this. So the server just contains a virtual file system, which actually has mounted local file storages. There is a stack. So we have separated this classical stack of the server by dividing it on a server site, which is just an application with a virtual file system, and a user backend, which is running on a user site, on a personal computer, on any operating system. It has some advantages, because it is simple to establish, it's simple to run, it's simple to set up, you don't have to worry about security, firewalls, you don't have to set up a wide static IP, you don't have to set up a password on your router, so it is really user-friendly. But there is one problem. If you turn off your laptop or your PC, there are no more connections. There is no more connection to your storage. And we have an idea, what if we put this client to dedicated hardware, and we had tried it. Last year I showed this technology running on Raspberry Pi. We have tried it, it works. We have tried it on other hardware. It is actually report our client to build root-based custom firmware. It runs on ARM boards, on many ARM boards. And now, and then we decided, what if we make our own hardware? It's a good opportunity to make something that user will have at home, can buy it, very affordable, nice device, very simple to use, really plug and play. And we did it. It looks like this. It's our pre-production prototype. It works. And everyone is invited to our workshop. We will show how it works, how it stops. And I want to invite my team here, even and bored, to say thanks to them. Thank you, that's all. Everyone is invited to our workshop. This is it.