I'm here at Mobile World Congress, Christian Flowers. I'm from the Moto Mods Ecosystem team, here with Moto Lenovo. And here to talk about today, our Transform the Smartphone Challenge. This is our Indiegogo campaign, where we're starting to see some crowdfunded ideas come to life. Some interesting things like, here we have a portable charger, wireless charging with battery, and the button. Yep. So that's a super charger, a smartphone, advanced notifications, and wireless charger that has notifications. So it's actually got an LED ring around the edge. So you can have your phone sitting on your desk, and it lights up, presumably different colors, different patterns, so you can understand what's going on without having to reach forward to touch your phone. That's cool. One of the more interesting ones I like is the Braille Moto Mod. So it actually physically raises bumps so that a long person can interact with their device and read through that common Braille interface that they're used to. You've got the walkie-talkie mod. So if you're camping or out and about with no cell signal, you can actually still communicate with your friends. It's all that GPS. Talk about gate path. So you had lots of submissions. Lots of submissions. We had 700 separate submissions. So far, 31 of those campaigns are live. So take a look. Boat with your wallet. The top crowdfunded entries we're going to bring into a shark tank. We're going to help bring those to reality. Nice. So then there's all these ideas people have. And the ultimate Moto Z mod with wireless charging.  Blazing fast and accurate mobile keyboard. Oh, that looks interesting. So who are all these guys doing these things? All sorts. Some of them are small people in their garage. Some of these are small companies. Some of these are large companies. So we're actually seeing a variety of people begin to develop Moto Mods. I'm there to have a really interesting concepts going on.  Let's go over there. We have a corner. Sorry I used the word crazy, but you're enabling... It's a great word, I think. You're enabling innovation. This is what's possible right now. Because not a platform, so you can't start moving around with... Ducked with the hardware that it's shipped with. So no one's going to put a 10X optical zoom in a phone. It's just too big. Well, you can buy the Hasselblad through Zoom and now you've added a 10X optical zoom. And there you're showing that you have different stages of development so you can get things done. Yeah, so you purchase the MDK that's available at developer.motorola.com.  This is the same tool we use internally for all of our own prototyping. So it has all of the infrastructure, the Moto Mods connector to connect back to the Moto Z and the magnet so it snaps on just like a Moto Mod does. All your microcontroller. There's actually a battery in here, your flash, your RAM. Easy debug interfaces. You don't need JTAG, just a Type-C cable, Linux, and open source tools. And so since all your infrastructure is in here, you can focus on whatever your idea is. So this one is behind all these cables and the battery right here so you can call it fly wire. Yeah, just wires flying around everywhere, solder to the board. That's your first level prototype that you can get done quickly and easily. And those hackathons, they were actually doing these. That's really what the hackathon level is, yes. And how many people do you have at your hackathons? Is it very worth it? So we had a New York hackathon that had about 90 participants and in 25 hours of development, they were able to complete 16 successful projects, functional, hardware, firmware, and software. We also did one in San Francisco. I think we had about 85 participants there and came up with 20 separate functional projects. So it was really interesting to see all these ideas. One person did a glucose meter, one did it some LED lights that gave notifications or gave you an equalizer, a robot that would follow your face around as you moved using the camera on the Moto Z, and then the Moto Mod actually drove the motors. So, and this looks cool, but I think there's a huge potential in having the backside of your phone do something else. And one way is LED lights. Yeah. Notifications, stuff like that. Real easy to do. And then if you use like the standard Android interface as like notification manager, you can see what comes in, create a custom icon, a custom pattern, maybe look at who it's from, and use that to indicate who it is other than a ringtone or a custom sound. Use some pretty lights that you can see from across the room. And there you have some different demonstrations of things. Precisely. So of course you get the perforated board where you would solder to. This is our hat adapter board. So if you don't do hardware very well, you can't do a circuit. When you solder, you burn yourself. This is mechanically electric compliant with the Raspberry Pi. So any of those hundreds and hundreds of hats that already exist, you can plug that into the top here, attach that to your development kit, write some firmware, and now without lifting a soldering iron, you have an instant prototype. These are end-to-end examples where we provide you the complete schematic, electrical, open-source firmware, and open-source software, so you can see how a sensor works, how a battery works, or how audio and display work. And we have other examples posted as well. And right here you have the different steps that goes into mass production. Certainly. So you would start with the MDK and your basic prototype.  You might build a surface mount board, a little sturdier, take it to a slightly wider audience to refine your concept. You can do all of this all on your own. You don't have to contact Motorola, but we'll certainly be there to help answer questions. At this point, when you actually want to build and make your integrated Moto Mod, you partner with us and we'll help you bring it to market. And this is the Moto Z area right here. Let's walk around just one second. Because the feeling that I have, I was around some airports, like Atlanta or somewhere in the US, and there was advertising for Moto Z everywhere. So if there's advertising, that means people are buying it, right? Yes. It's a successful product. Oh, we're really excited. We're really committed to it. We think it's the best device in the world. And right here, the projector, people love that, right? Oh yeah, this is actually one of my favorites. I got to work on it personally. At about five feet away, you get a 70 inch screen. Nice, right? It works with every app. You don't have to write a custom application. You don't have to change anything to make this work. You get mirroring what's on the screen by default. Something else that's interesting, I can turn off my Android screen. The projector keeps going, right?  They keep going like they should. Keystone correction, so as you change the angle, you keep a nice square view. And you can see the kickstand on here goes all the way vertical. So you can shoot on the ceiling, lying in bed relaxing. Here you've got your video there. So there we have a nice, super nice projector. I'd like to see something like, wait, I can't reach right there, but I'd like to see it reflect down and touch on the table. But that's if somebody wants to do that, they could suddenly do that. They could do like, they can turn this into a Sony Xperia Touch, the one that they're showing up there with. The whole table is a touch screen, but you have to just do it, right? You have to probably add a couple extra sensors to detect your hand and do that IR, or add a camera potentially, but it's certainly feasible. And that is just over on here. This is the Zoos, which is amazing. We have here some batteries, right? And the speaker. And what's going on here? Ah, it's just to show. You can have it. Oh, this is our car dock. Yep. So you can see it's plugged in through your car vent here. It has a nice charging adapter, as well as an aux cable. So you would attach this to your car stereo. If you've got an older car like some of us do, you don't have Bluetooth or something like that.  And you've announced, internally at Motorola, you've got to definitely launch a whole bunch of these normal ones. You've said how many? There was an announcement, I think, right? We're shooting for more than 10 a year. More than 10 years. So that means you have internal teams making these also? Yes, we do. Is there any chance we can maybe chat with your guy over there? Let's check. One second. Right here. Okay, he's back. Okay, so you have teams working on potentially some awesome motor mods. Of course. I don't know straight what's possible, but you'd like to have the whole ecosystem do them, right? We want to encourage both. So the ecosystem is starting to evolve with our hackathons and with the Unigodal campaign. We're really starting to get some traction. But there are definitely some difficult things that we really want to do ourselves to show the full capabilities of the platform. Do you want to encourage other manufacturers to use motor mods too? Oh, sure. Uh-oh. I mean like launch motor mods. I went to the Alcatel booth and they're trying this. Looks like they do something similar, but they only have an LED back and that's it. And a speaker, they'll have a speaker.  To my knowledge, there's no plan of expanding that outside. All right. So I'd like to see an e-ink back case that'd be so nice. That'd be nice, yeah. And a few more killer mods and grow your market share. Yep. I've definitely seen on Indiegogo, apparently the campaigns aren't launched, but I've seen the full list of submissions and several of those were e-ink. So hopefully we get that to market for you soon. Can you push to all the Moto Z owners? Can you put a notification to them that says, hey, check out the Indiegogo? Or you're not allowed to do that, I guess. It's privacy or something. But it's just some kind of thing.  If, you know, users who have given us permission and said, yes, I want communications from Motorola, we can certainly give them emails, but we wouldn't push to your device now.


Okay, good morning everyone. Good to be back with you all in person. How has it been the last few weeks with online? Is it okay here? Yeah, okay. Good morning to all of you online as well. Let's just begin with a word of prayer. Would anyone be willing to open us in prayer please? Anyone in person, even online? As we have carried out the first study, help us to receive your words of Lord. Lord, you guide us through all that day so that we'll be able to receive all your words that you're going to reveal us through the mamlu. Absolutely, everyone into your hand. In Jesus they might pray. Amen. Thank you. So, last week we finished our book, God's Word, the Miracle Seed. So this week we go into your textbook notes and start talking about interpretation. So God's Word, the Miracle Seed, the main goal of us reading that book was to look at the importance of God's Word, first of all, but for us personally. So before we start to talk about why it's important to interpret Scripture for others, we first want to recognize the importance of Scripture and how we can personally grow by meditating on the Word of God. So from here we now move into interpreting Scripture. That is, how do we look at a scriptural text? How do we understand the meaning of that text correctly and accurately so that when we are teaching others, we are teaching what is right. We're not misinterpreting Scripture and we're not teaching others wrong meaning of what is in the Word of God. So before we begin, we'll just look at a few words that are used quite popularly in talking about Scripture, how people study Scripture, how Scripture is taught. These are just different ways in which, so this is like formal terminology. We will especially hear it in academic kind of settings. The first is hermeneutics, which is what we are doing here, interpreting Scripture. So we look at what are some of the principles of looking at a biblical text and understanding its meaning. So the science and art or looking at some basic rules for how do we understand the meaning of a text. That's hermeneutics. Exegesis is where we look at the original language especially. So exegesis is where we go into the Hebrew and Greek of the text. We also look at the context, the historical context as well, but mainly it's looking at the literary context. So understanding it in the original languages and then understanding the meaning of Scripture. So that would be a much more in-depth study of the Scriptures also requiring knowledge of Hebrew and Greek. Exposition is when we are explaining it to others, especially in the form of teaching or teaching, where we understand the meaning of a passage and then we are communicating it with others. So that is exposition. Then hermeneutics and preaching, so this is where we're doing the same thing. We're both understanding the meaning of the Scripture, but we're also then putting it in a way that is relevant to the hearers. So for example, if we are taking Matthew 633, seek first the kingdom of God. So I can preach a sermon on it, but based on my audience, I can talk about the meaning of the text. I can say, what does it mean to seek the kingdom of God? What is the kingdom of God? How can we seek the kingdom of God? All of these things is what I'm preaching in my sermon. But then I also look at the audience that I'm preaching to. So if I'm preaching here to all of you, what are the contexts that you are in? What are the ways in which you can be seeking the kingdom? How can you put God's kingdom first in your studies, in how you're living your daily lives here while you're in Bible college? But if I'm talking to maybe someone who's working, how can they take this passage and stop thinking about all of the financial constraints that they have? So where work has become their means of supporting their family, whether if that's taken over their way of living and they've given a second seat to God, to the things of God. Then preaching about, okay, how do we make sure that we first seek God before we put our jobs and all of these financial things that burdens that you're carrying? So depending on their marital status, depending on their work status, depending on whether it's a rural or an urban setting, so if they're in a city or a town or a village, we preach based on the context. So relevance to the people who are hearing. So that's the difference between preaching and exposition. Exposition is just explaining the meaning of the text to somebody. But in a preaching situation, we'll also make it relevant for the specific hearers that we are preaching to. And then teaching is the same thing where we are explaining it. But when we're teaching, we follow this kind of format. It's different from a sermon where there's much more talking from the pulpit and everyone's listening. But here we want to hear from the students. We want it to be a discussion and we want to be learning together. So are all of those terms clear? Any questions? Any of the terms? The last, the teaching? Okay, so teaching is just, we're doing the same thing, the communicating the same content. But like how in a preaching setting, if you're preaching to an audience, it's one way, right?  And they're preaching more, say it's more like a speech. But in a teaching setting, it's where we are explaining we're going more in-depth into the topic. We may have like a class discussion, all of those things. So there's opportunity for discussion between those who are hearing and the person who is teaching. In preaching, it's a one-way communication where someone is standing in front and doing all the talking and the other people are listening. And it's much more focused on your ability to communicate in a way that is easy. I think you have to have some skills where people can listen to what you're saying. And it's presented in a way that is skillful. It's presented in a way that is logical, all of those things. So a sermon is different from a class, right? When we're sitting in class, how is a Sunday sermon different from us sitting in class here at Bible College? It's more interactive. So it's much more like we're both listening to each other, we're both talking to each other. Whereas preaching is just the person who is giving us a sermon, who's talking and everyone else is listening. Is that clear? So let's go on. Any other questions from those online? Okay, we can go on. This is also in your textbook, so you all can read it there as well. So we look at why do we need to interpret scripture? We look at a few examples from the Bible itself. Let's open to these passages, Acts 8, 27 to 35. Someone can read that for us, please. Can I read, Sister? Yes, sure. Go ahead. Acts 8, 27 to 35. So he arose and went and behold a man of Ethiopia, a unit of great authority under Candles, the queen of the Ethiopians who had charge of all the treasury and had come to Jerusalem to worship. He was returning and sitting in a chariot. He was reading Isaiah the prophet. Then the Spirit said to Philip, go near and overtake this chariot. So Philip ran to him and heard him reading the prophet Isaiah and said, do you understand what you're reading? And he said, how can I, unless someone guides me? And he asked Philip to come up and sit with him. The place in the scripture which he read was this. He was led as a sheep to the slaughter and as a lamb before his skewerer in silent. So he opened not his mouth in his humiliation. He just was taken away and who will declare his generation for his life is taken from the earth. So the unit answered Philip and said, I ask you of whom does the prophet say this of himself or some other man? Then Philip opened his mouth and beginning at this scripture, pray Jesus to him. Thank you. So we see in scripture itself that there was this process of interpreting scripture. It's not something that we've invented now, right? So here in this passage, the key question is in verse 31. How can I understand unless someone explains it to me? So of course we have the Holy Spirit and we can read passages of scripture and receive revelation from scripture by ourselves. But somebody who has studied scripture for longer than us, who knows the whole of scripture, will always be able to contribute more to our understanding of scripture. So that is where the role of interpretation comes in. Where we study it and then we explain that to others. Or somebody else is studying it and they are explaining that to us. It's just an additional way of studying the scriptures. This doesn't mean that we stop studying it for ourselves. So we look more at how do we follow the example of the Berian Christians, right? When Paul was teaching them, they went back and looked at the scriptures for themselves. So having somebody who is teaching us, who is interpreting, who is helping us understand things deeper than we understand, but also doing our own examination of scripture and studying it for ourselves as well, to check whatever is being taught, making sure that it's in line with the word. Let's also look at Nehemiah 8 verses 1-8, please. Nehemiah 8 verse 1, now all the people gather together as one man. In the open square that was in front of the water gate, and they told Ezra of the sky to bring the book of the law of Moses which the Lord had commanded Israel. So Ezra the priest brought the law before the assembly of man and woman and all who could hear with understanding on the first day of the seventh month, then he read from it in the open square that was in front of the water gate from morning until midday before the man and woman and those who could understand. And the ears of all the people were attentive to the book of the law. So Ezra the scribe stood on a platform of wood which they had made for the purpose. And beside him at his right hand stood Matthew, Shema, Anaya, Ujriah, Hikia and Messiah. And his left hand, Pedia, Messiah, Malkaja, Fushum, Ashbadanah, Zakaria and Mesulam. Verse 5, and Ezra opened the book in the side of all the people for he was standing above all the people and when he opened it all the people stood up. Verse 6, and Ezra blessed the Lord, the great God, then all people answered, Amen, Amen. While lifting up their hands and they bowed their heads and worshipped the Lord with their faces to the ground. Verse 7, also Jeshua, Bani, Sherabia, Zamin, Aqab, Shabetha, Bodhija, Messiah, Kelita, Azreo, Josbath, Hanan, Pelia and the Levites helped the people to understand the law and the people stood in their place. Verse 8, so they read distinctly from the book in the law of God and they gave the sense and helped them to understand the reading. Thank you. So we see here in verse 8 that the Levites are making clear the meaning of what is being read from the book of the law. So Ezra is the scribe, he's reading the law and then there's another group of people who are explaining, helping the people understand the meaning of what is being read. So the Hebrew word here is paras, it means to make distinct or to interpret. So to make clear the meaning of what is being read. So we see both in the Old Testament and the New Testament is practice of interpretation that was taking place with the scriptures so that people could understand what was being taught. So why is interpretation important? Any thoughts on why we need to interpret scripture? So something is not like a passage of scripture is not misunderstood or misinterpreted. And what is the danger of misinterpretation? So having wrong beliefs or wrong understanding of whatever it is, whether it is who God is or what God wants from us. So we look here at interpretation to application. So when we're interpreting scripture, we're reading it and then we understand the meaning and based on what we understand, we live a certain way. So we move from understanding to applying it to our lives. So if we don't understand the scripture correctly, then how we apply it to our lives will also be incorrect. So we want to make sure that we rightly understand, we rightly apply it, but we also rightly communicate it to others so that we're not leading a whole other group of people astray. So we're looking at interpreting scripture mainly from the perspective of when we are teaching others. Whatever, if we understand it incorrectly, then what we teach others will be incorrect. And then there's a whole other group of people who has a wrong understanding of what the Bible has said. So let's take an example from scripture itself of something that can be misinterpreted. There is the example in the book of Ruth where when somebody came into agreement with another person, there was a practice of taking a person's shoe off. So we can see that in Ruth chapter 4. So we read Ruth chapter 4 verse 7. Now in earlier times in Israel, for the redemption and transfer of property to become final, one party took off his sandal and gave it to the other. This was the method of legalizing transactions in Israel. So we can see here in scripture that they are talking about how an agreement was made and the agreement was in those times in Israel. This is how it was done. Now if we take this scripture and we say we have to also follow this and every time we are agreeing with someone on something, one of us has to take off our shoe and give it to the other person. And we all start to follow that. What is going to happen? We will all be walking around with only one shoe. You won't have any pair of shoes. So understanding here when we are looking at Ruth chapter 7, we look at this is for this time in that culture. All of that is part of interpretation. Recognizing this is not something that we have to follow today. We understand the concept of coming into agreement with someone of being true to the agreement of making sure that we do our side of whatever we have agreed to all of those things. But we don't have to take that practice and follow it exactly. So that's where interpretation comes in. And being able to separate what is important, what is still to be followed today, what is a cultural practice, what is a principle that we can learn from the scripture and how can we apply that principle in our lives today. So let's continue. What are some challenges as we interpret the Bible? So we look at this, but what are some challenges you all have faced when you are interpreting scripture, when you are reading the Bible? What are some things you found difficult in understanding a passage personally as you personally read the Bible? I think for me, one of the main things is the context. Because when we read, I mean, you can read verses, you get so many things on, say, someone talking about a topic and giving us a word of scripture, but then sometimes it can be totally taken out of context. And when you read it yourself, unless you read the whole chapter, it can be challenging. Because when you read the whole chapter and you do a bit of study on it, then it gives you a completely different meaning. Thank you. So being able to take a passage within the context of the larger book that it's in or taking a verse within the context of a chapter. So if you just take a verse by itself, you may not understand the meaning of it until you read the verses before it. The verses after it and understand why is this particular command given or why is this teaching given any other challenges that you'll have faced as you read scripture in understanding what it's talking about. Okay, so the relevance to so being able to take that and understand what is the principle in it and how can I apply this to my life. So that is a challenge, because sometimes it may seem that it's just some information that has no, no relevance, no connection to your daily life, what your spiritual life. Okay. Matthew, you have a lot of genealogy. So initial days, it was like, you know, you're just getting just like, okay, part of scripture you try to read through. But there is a significance attached to that. So we over read that and, you know, we tend to ignore so many names and what's the point of reading who we got home, who we got home. But later on the years you understand each name had a meaning, had a purpose, had a significance. And the order of that thing also forms meaning in itself. Yeah. So understanding the more we grow in our understanding of scripture, there are certain things, especially when we're reading it initially. So I'll give the example of the genealogy. We're reading the genealogy, and it's just a list of names. And you think, what is the point of this? I'm just going to skip this and go to where the story actually begins. So understanding that even in those things, there was so much purpose with which those names were listed. There's intention behind how it's listed, who is listed, all of those things. So without having the tools to look at why have they named certain people here, why have they excluded certain people or how have they chosen to list this genealogy. All of those things can contribute to a better and richer and fuller understanding of the Bible. Okay, thank you. So here we have a list of a few challenges as we interpret scripture. I'm sure we've all experienced this at one point or another. One is a spiritual gap. So when we look at the Bible, we see over time that truth was revealed over time. Job is the earliest book in the Bible. There is no dating for the book of Job, but it is believed to be the earliest book. And then the latest book that's written is the book of Revelation, which is in the 90s AD. So we have these books of the Bible and from Job to Revelation, there is so much about God that we learn along the way. So if Job is the first book and Job talks about suffering and sickness, we won't base our understanding of suffering and sickness on the book of Job. Because we have from Job to the covenant with the Israelites, to the coming of Jesus, to Jesus' ministry, Jesus' death and resurrection, Jesus' victory over sin, over death, over sickness. And then we come to the book of Revelation, which is the hope of eternity with God in His presence, without sickness, without death. So we have all of this Revelation and so when we understand sickness, we should be looking at that final understanding. Not look at the book of Job and base our understanding on that first initial revelation because there's so much that is still to be revealed about God. So when we look at any topic like that, we need to look at when was this taught in the timeline of the Bible, right? So if we're looking at the prophets, we know in the prophets that they're talking about the Messiah coming. They are foreseeing that Israel will be restored, but they still don't know about who is the Messiah, when is He going to come? They don't know full details, they know whatever the Holy Spirit had inspired them to write at that time. But we know from the New Testament, Jesus came, we know. So when we are studying any passage, understand where it is in the timeline of the Bible, what was their understanding of that topic and what do we know beyond that time? And so we interpret everything in taking into account the whole of Scripture, not only what that passage is talking about. Okay, does that make sense? Yeah. So let's just look at Luke 1248 and Mark 425. Luke 1248, but he who did not know yet committed things deserving of stripes shall be beaten with few for everyone to whom much is given from him much will be required and to whom much has been committed of him they will ask more. Thank you. And Mark 425 please. Yeah, Mark 425 for whoever has to him more will be given, but whoever does not have even what he has will be taken away from him. So both these passages are talking about how people, the amount of revelation that people have, right? So Luke 1248 based on how much you know is how much you will be judged. And Mark 425 is saying based on your willingness to learn to receive revelation more will be given or even the little that you have will be taken away if you're not willing to learn more to understand more of who God is. So we have this gift of having this whole revelation of scripture. And so our responsibility is then to fully take that revelation. We can't operate as people who who were in the Old Testament times. Okay, because we have the New Testament. So we are responsible to have a full understanding or to seek a greater understanding from the whole of scripture and to live in accordance with all of scripture's teaching. Another challenge in biblical interpretation is the time gap. So here we have listed a few dates, right? The Pentateuch. So if Job came before the Pentateuch, the Pentateuch was written in 1400 BC. So 1400 years before Jesus came. And now we are 2,024 years or 2020 years past Jesus's birth. So about 3,400 years ago was when Moses wrote the Pentateuch. Job was even before that. Then the book of Revelation is written in 90 AD. So about 1900 years from 2024. And we have the Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures in 200 BC. So all of these things were done like centuries, millenniums ago, right? There's a huge gap in their way of communicating in the culture in so many things. And even within the Bible from 3,400 years ago to 1900 years ago. That is the span of the scriptures writing from Genesis to Revelation. So to understand that time has also progressed in the Bible. And we need to understand what we are reading, the book that we are reading in the time that it was written. We can't interpret the book of Mark the same way we would interpret Isaiah. Because Isaiah was written at a completely different time and Mark was written at a completely different time. We'll also look at the cultural gap, right? So time, culture, all of those things play a role. Let's look at the geographical gap. So the Bible is written in so many different places like the people of God moved from one place to another. Starting with the Garden of Eden and then Abraham being led out to go to the Promised Land. Geography is important in the Bible, right? Why do you all think it's important? Do you think it's important at all? Yes? Why do you think it's important? So one reason that I can think of is that God promised a specific piece of land to the people of Israel. Okay, God himself chose a specific geography for where he would reveal himself, where he would place his people. And it was a strategic kind of place because of where Israel is located. It's right in the center and there were so many people coming in from so many different places. Which is why that piece of land is such a central land to even conflict, right? There's so much fighting over that land because it's right in the middle of so many big nations. And so when we look at geography, we look at God himself placing an importance on a specific location. So the Garden of Eden when we read in Genesis, there's a description of the geography there where exactly the Garden of Eden was. And then when God leads Abraham out, he takes him to this land. He says, this is the land I'm going to give to your descendants. And the focus is always on the people going back to that land. So even when they go into exile, God's promise of them returning. The place where the temple is established is important being in Jerusalem. So there is an understanding of those geographies that helps us to better understand what was happening in the Bible. So if we read about Jesus traveling in Galilee, where was Galilee? What was that place like? There was a sea there. So that's why he was able to access so many fishermen. That's why he was able to have so many disciples who were fishermen. So understanding the places he was in, the places he was ministering in, what was the culture in that place? It's important, right? So when we are in Bangalore, the culture here is completely different from, say, another part of India. Being in India is so different from being in another part of the world. Geography helps us understand a lot of why we do the things we do, the way we do certain things. All of those things will impact our understanding of Scripture. And so that's why we look at maps when we are looking at the Scripture passage and it mentions a place. It's helpful to look at a map and find where it was on the map. And who were the people there who were living in that place? What were they like? What was the culture there? All of those things. Also one additional point with the time gap. Why it's important to understand the time is also based on the time there was something happening in history, in larger history. There was something happening historically for the people of God and there was something happening historically for the world at large as well. But when we say if we look at the book of Corinthians, Paul is writing to his audience at a specific time. And that time depends on what situation were they facing, what was going on in the church at that time. And why did he write the things he wrote? If we don't look at the time, then we don't understand why is he saying women can do certain things, women shouldn't do certain things. Or if he is giving instructions on marriage and singleness, why is he saying that? If we understand that there was something going on in the church at this time, this was a question that the church had about marriage. So Paul's teaching is a response to their question on marriage. That's where time also comes in. So there's the timeline of scripture and then there's the specific time in which that book was written relevant to what was happening with the group of people that it was written to. Okay, so cultural gap. Like we looked at that example in Ruth. So understanding that this is a cultural practice. This is not something for us to follow exactly as it's written in the Bible. But we'll take what the principle is from this passage and we'll apply it in a way that is relevant to our culture today. Okay, so we understand the principle and make applications culturally. So any thoughts on why this is important? Why is cultural translation important? What's that? It's adaptable to a particular section of people. It's better adaptable, yes. So one of the challenges we face in India is that people view Christianity as a Western religion. Why do you all think that is? Because it was brought to India by the Western civilization like the Portuguese and the British. Yes, so it was brought by people who were outside of India and a lot of people from the West. But we know that Christianity came to India right from Jesus' disciples, right? But a lot of what we are doing in the church today is so influenced by the Western church. And it's so foreign to Indian culture, right? So when a lot of people look at what we're doing, they don't understand what we're doing. And they look at it as something that is foreign. Whereas if we are able to take the principles of worship, the principles of how do we as a community gather and honour Jesus in our midst and then take that and put it in a way that is culturally relevant. So how do people worship in the setting? We want to take it to say we're going to a village. We can't go and sing English songs. We can't take an electric guitar and have a drum kit. It just won't make any sense to them what we're doing. So we understand how do they worship there. And then we take the truth of Jesus and we sing it in a way that they understand worship. So that's just one example, but so many things like that. So we'll be talking also about translation of the Bible a little later. But this is one thing that I was reading about is where in scripture it says, Behold the Lamb of God. Missionaries have actually translated that in cultures where they have no exposure to sheep. They don't understand what that means to be a lamb. What it meant something in the Jewish culture, right? There were shepherds and they looked after sheep and there was relevance to their culture. They understood what it meant to be a shepherd. How do you take care of sheep? What does sheep do? Why are sheep important? They were using sheep in their sacrifices at the temple, all of these things. They were using lambs at their sacrifice in the temple. So when John is talking about Jesus the Lamb of God, it immediately connects with the people there. But when missionaries were taking it to, I can read more and tell you where exactly it was, but as they were taking it to another culture where sheep were not something that they had in their country, but the same things were being done with pigs. So they had to, they replaced it to say the pig. To help them understand that what the pig meant in their culture is what the lamb meant to the Jews. So that is where cultural translation is important. Where we understand what did this mean to the Jews and what does it mean to the people we are ministering to? And how can we rightly communicate what is in Scripture to them so that they understand the significance of it? Okay, we have a few more minutes. We'll finish this. So language gap. We know that the Bible is written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Aramaic is just a few parts of the Bible are written in Aramaic. Majority is Hebrew and Greek. But translation, like I was just giving this example, translation is a problem. There are challenges to translation because language is related to culture. So the words we use, the way we communicate is not just, there's just not literal translations for every word into another language. So we have to take into context the culture. We have to take into context saying so every culture has its own idioms. So understanding what did this mean? So sometimes in the Bible, there'll be translations that it's not very clear what the meaning of this saying is. They've given their best translation, but they are also explaining that there is some challenge in this translation because it was a Hebrew saying or it was something that is not fully understood by us today. So we have those kinds of challenges where there may not be an exact word. There may be a saying that is there that we'll have to figure out how to communicate the same kind of saying in our setting, in English or in Hindi or in whichever language we're translating to. And then also there's the challenge of is it communicating the same meaning, the same word that is used. There are so many sermons on how Greek has so many words on love. English has one word for love and Greek has multiple words that all have different meanings. So when we're translating from that Greek version to English, they're only using the word love, love, love, love, love. But what is used in the original language is different. And so there's that challenge also of trying to grasp the full meaning of the word when we're translating to a different language. Okay, so we'll stop here. We'll continue when we come back after our break.


Item No. SCP-432 Object Class Safe Special Containment Procedures SCP-432 is kept in a standard storage area of Sector 25. It is to be kept locked at all times and the key to the lock kept in an adjacent security station under guard by three level 3 personnel. No letter of special containment required.  The exterior of the cabinet is painted matte green and bears no remarkable features except small areas of corrosion and light scratching, commensurate with being left exposed to the elements for a prolonged period of time. The doors of the cabinet are fitted with a basic slide bolt and a hash for a padlock, allowing the door to be secured from outside. The interior dimensions of SCP-432 display significant disparity with the exterior. The doors open into an apparently extra-dimensional space containing a large labyrinth complex comprised of an as-of-yet-unchartered series of corridors. The walls, floors, and ceilings of the corridors are constructed from heavily rusted steel and adhered to the same height and width scales as the exterior of SCP-432, 2 m high by 1.2 m wide. The corridors within SCP-432 are lit at irregular intervals by what appears to be regular household light bulbs secured to the walls and wire mesh fittings. Many of the bulbs observed flicker and numerous others are burnt out or broken, and places several large-gauge steel pipes have been found bolted to the walls of the tunnel. These pipes are notably cold to the touch to contain flowing water, although the source and destination of the pipes in water are unknown. Many of the pipes observed are in obvious need of repair and leak cold, average of 3°C water. Analysis of this water has revealed a low-oxygen content and trace amounts of iron oxide but the water is otherwise potable. The exact size of the labyrinth complex to which SCP-432 connects cannot be accurately measured at each time the doors of the cabinets are closed and then reopened. The entrance created by the cabinet apparently moves to a different section of the maze. The fate of personnel within the maze from the doors closed is unknown, although remains discovered within the maze suggests starvation is a likely outcome. Other remains, coupled with additional evidence gathered during exploration, suggest that the labyrinth contains a large predatory inhabitant of indeterminate species, hereafter known as SCP-432-1. GPS units used within SCP-432 are rendered useless, as are cellular phones. Remote-controlled devices in an SCP-432 are similarly impaired and cease to function by traveling an average of 20 meters into the maze, rendering a remote mapping of the internal layout impossible. High-gain radio transmissions can be used to keep in contact with personnel within the labyrinth, although significant interference occurs deeper into the maze. At the door of the cabinet are closed and all forms of contact with personnel within SCP-432 are severed. SCP-432 was discovered in an abandoned industrial complex in ██████ United Kingdom. It came to the attention of the Foundation after Dr. T. Small heard reports of several homeless persons in the area disappearing after staying in the complex. Upon investigation, Dr. Small discovered a cabinet at the center of an abandoned still meal, surrounded by a number of sleeping bags, bags of clothing and other personal effects, suggesting a number of homeless persons had recently made camp there. SCP-432 was unlocked, but the door closed upon discovery. After exploring the immediate area beyond the entrance, Dr. Small exited SCP-432 and summoned Foundation personnel to transport the cabinet to sector 25 for analysis. Currently, ██████ expeditions have been sent into SCP-432 to attempt to chart its internal geography. To date, ██████ D-Class personnel have been lost within the maze. No further expeditions may be made without express permission from at least two Level-4 personnel. Paint samples, metal fatigue, and construction techniques date SCP-432 to have them been constructed in the early 1950s. However, artifacts recovered from within SCP-432 have been accurately dated to much earlier periods. Expeditions. Below are the expeditions within SCP-432 of the date. The standard agreed mission equipment pack agreed by Dr. T. Small and Dr. ████ is ████. One hand torch was a 3-hour lifespan and additional power source providing up to six additional hours. One headset microphone linked to control. One shoulder-mounted video unit set for wireless transmission. Two 0.5-liter bottles of water. Two high-calorie energy bars and H-sticks of luminous marker chalk. SCP-432 Expedition ████ Date ████ Expedition Supervisor Dr. T. Small's. Subject is D-64502, male, average physique. Subject's background shows history of aggravated assault and burglary. Subject is equipped with standard mission equipment pack and center in the SCP-432. Camera is activated and Subject enters SCP-432. The door is held open by a 3-kilogram weight placed inside the doorway, with technicians on hand to remove the weight and close the door if required. Camera activates showing a short corridor constructed from the same rusted, corroded metal as the exterior of SCP-432. The floor is formed from rich safety steel, as might be found in industrial walkways or gantries. The corridor makes a 90-degree turn to the right approximately 5 meters ahead of the subject. Control asks the subject to move around the corner. Subject moves forward to request it turn the corner into a longer tunnel. The exact windage cannot be judged through the lack of lighting. A conventional electric bulb on the wall lights the immediate area but the light fails to illuminate much beyond 3 meters. Further lights can be observed ahead, though they only illuminate patches of the tunnel. Control instructs the subject to turn on his torch and the lighting is notably improved to the limit of the torch's beam, approximately 20 meters. Control asks the subject to proceed down the tunnel. At the approximately 42 meters across roads appear a tunnel. D-64502 asks control which way to go, and control tells the subject to pick a tunnel. The subject chooses to go left and before entering the new tunnel proceeds a stick of marker chalk from the equipment pack and draws a large arrow on the wall, indicating the direction of the exit. As the subject moves into the new tunnel, control notes that video quality has begun to degrade with visible interference appearing on the monitors. Control does not inform the subject of this. Subject proceeds down new tunnel for 11 meters before tunnel T-junctions left and right. Subject takes the left tunnel. Again, marking the direction back to the exit with chalk and continues onward. Subject walks approximately 5 meters down the tunnel then stops and asks control if they heard anything. Control replies they deny it and ask what D-64502 heard. Subject is quiet as it is listening, then replies the mute of tones that he can hear someone banging on the wall in the distance and shouting.  Control boosts audio gain on the subject's camera and picks up sounds similar to the subject's description. Repetitive distance banging consists of someone striking a metal surface with their arms or hand. A voice can be detected but audio quality is not sufficient to discern words. Subject is becoming increasingly agitated by the sounds. Control informs the subject to move in the direction of the shouts. The subject objects but after a short discussion with control about the nature of his employment he moves forward. After approximately 14 meters the tunnel turns 90 degrees right and angles downward in a gentle slope. Video interference is now noticeably increased and slight audio interference is now audible. Subject has begun breathing heavily and muttering under its breath. Subject continues down the tunnel for approximately 27 meters until the floor levels out again. The subject abruptly stops, crouches and swears. Control asks why he stopped. The subject remains quiet but breathing has become louder and heavier. Control asks again why the subject has stopped and D-64502 replies he heard a scream and at the bang and shouting has suddenly stopped. Control informs the subject to stand and move forward, but the subject becomes agitated and demands to be allowed to leave. After several minutes of arguing the subject stands takes a long drink from one of the bottle of water and moves forward again, although slowly. Ahead the tunnel, T junctions left and right. Control tells the subject to go right. Subject marks the way back to the exit with chalk and goes right. The tunnel ends in a dead end after 6 meters. Control informs the subject to go back to the junction and take the left tunnel. This too leads in a dead end after only 4 meters. Subject seems to have come slightly and suggest returning to the previous T junction and trying to get out of the tunnel. Control confirms with Dr. ██ who decides to recall the subject and announce the data collected so far. The subject has been within SCP-432 for exactly 37 minutes at this point. Control informs the subject to return. The subject moves back through the tunnels, following his chalk marks towards the exit. At crossroads the subject freezes again as control is heard a noise. Control confirms that they are detecting a sound but requests D-6450 to explain what he is hearing. Subject identifies the noise as wind. At this point the camera captures a small drift of what appears to be dead lead blown from the right hand unexplored tunnel. Subject remarks of the breeze smell stale. Control informs the subject to collect several leads for analysis and then proceed down the right hand tunnel to locate their source. Subject collects leads and complains about orders to remain in SCP-432 but moves towards the tunnel mouth.  Subject panics, screams and runs for the exit ignoring control's demand to investigate the sound. Subject sprints towards the exit and collapses in the storage area. Expeditions aborted, the door closed and locked and the subject removed for debriefing. SCP-432, Expedition-2, Date ██████ Expedition Supervisor, Dr. T. Smalls Subject is D-641-1, female, 32, average physique. Subject's background shows an incident of attempted murder. Subject is equipped with standard mission equipment pack and sent into SCP-432. Camera is activated and subject enters SCP-432. The door is held open by a 3kg weight placed inside the doorway with technicians on hand to remove the weight and close the door if required. Camera activates showing subject is in a long corridor constructed from the same corroded metal as the exterior of SCP-432. Light from the open door behind the subject, coupled with the illumination provided by the bulbs located at regular intervals on the walls of the structure, lights the tunnel for approximately 20 meters. More lights are visible further down the tunnel but are very dim. Control requests subject turn on or torch and move into the structure, subject complies. The passage continues for approximately 100 meters from the entrance until it ends in a T-junction, leading left and right. Subject asks control which way to go and is told to go right. D-641-1 marks the route back to the exit with marker chalk and proceeds down the tunnel for 50 meters until a crossroads is reached. Control informs subject to take the left hand branch and subject marks the tunnel wall and enters the indicated passageway, which is followed for 47 meters until another crossroads is reached. Control notes interference to both the video and audio feeds have begun to appear but is currently negligible. Subject pauses the drink from one of her bottles of water and marks her route back before selecting, without permission from control, the right hand branch. Control admonishes D-641-1 but allows her to continue. The passageway makes a 90 degree turn left her to 18 meters, then continues straight for approximately 73 meters. Ahead of the subject appears another crossroads but as the subject nears it she freezes and reports that she can hear a rhythmic banging coming through the walls. Control boosts audio gain on camera and a sound is picked up. The banging lasts for 73 seconds before it stops. Subject has remained still while listening, attempting to breathe quietly. Control prompts the subject to mark the tunnel wall and proceed left. The subject remained motionless and makes several inquiries in the nature of SCP-432 and the sources of banging. Control firmly reiterates her commands and subject resumes walking, taking the left tunnel as indicated. Subject has traveled for almost 150 meters when she stops and aims the camera at the left wall of the tunnel. She observes that all of the light fittings in this stretch of the structure have been broken. Shards of broken bulb of visible scattered across the floor. Subject continues forward remarking that she has begun to detect a faint, unpleasant odor. When asked to describe said odor, D-641-1 replies, something dead. After a further 24 meters the subject noticed an object in the tunnel ahead and moves towards it. Audio quality is now beginning to severely degrade. Camera angle tilts the subject kneels to examine the object and Control asks subject to explain what she has found. Subject explains the object as a left sports shoe, commonly known as a ████ sneaker. The camera zooms in on an object while the subject illuminates it with a light source. Camera review tilts again as subject suddenly looks down at the floor of the tunnel and admits a loud expletive. The floor of the tunnel is covered with a large quantity of dried brown residue that crackles and flakes as the subject moves her feet. Sprays of the residue observe dried onto the walls. The subject remarks that the substance is apparently the source of the odor and she surmises it is dried blood. The camera tracks several large smears of the substance leading away from the pool up the corridor. Subject's breathing is becoming slightly panicked. Control requests the subject collect the shoe and assemble the substance for analysis. Subject does so although complains continuously about the smell and expresses wishes to exit SCP-432. Her requests are denied and control orders the subject to continue onwards. Subject continues down the corridor at a much decreased walking speed and is becoming agitated. Camera review changes repeatedly as subject begins looking over a shoulder at erratic intervals. Video and audio feet are beginning to become severe and control asks subject to halt while they confer with Dr. ████. Dr. ████ decides to recall the subject who is now becoming extremely panicked, complaining of hearing footsteps behind the wall to her right. Control boots audio but interference prevents confirmation of subject observations. Dr. ████ confirms the exhibition is over and control recalls the subject who begins moving back towards the exit at increasing speed. Subjects aggress from SCP-432 is unremarkable except for subject's increasing speed as she nears the exit. Once out of SCP-432 the door is closed and locked and subject sent for debrief. SCP-432 Exhibition 4 Date ████ Expedition Supervisor Dr. T. Smalls Team is made up of three members, D-5891, Male-27, D-8321, Female-32, and Technical Assistant. Equipment packed for this exhibition differs from norm each member carries. One hand torch and a 3-hour lifespan with additional power source and providing up to six additional hours. One headset microphone leads to control, 2.5 liter bottles of water, two high-calorie energy bars. Subject D-5891 is equipped with 10 sticks of luminous marker chalk, one 250mm steel rebar. Subject D-8321 is equipped with one shoulder-mounted video unit set for wireless transmission. Technical Assistant is equipped with one standard-issued breaded 9mm firearm with 20 rounds of ammunition, one back-mounted oxy-acetylene-cutting torch. Subjects have been briefed there to enter SCP-432, move a short distance as a structure, and then attempt to cut through the interior walls with the oxy-acetylene torch. Camera is activated and Team enters SCP-432. The door is held open by a 3kg weight placed inside the doorway, with technicians on hand to remove the weight and close the door if required. Camera activates showing teams in a long corridor constructed from the same corroded metal as the exterior SCP-432. Light from the team's torches illuminates the tunnel for approximately 30 meters. The team moves into the structure with D-5891 marking their progress every few meters with luminous chalk. After several turnings chosen by control at random, the team arrives at the crossroads, attached to the wall of the northern passageway of two large steel pipes. The team is asked by control to examine these pipes. Places a hand of one pipe and remarks it as very cold to the touch, and that there is a sensation of liquid moving within the pipe. Requests to cut into the pipe by control denies the request, informing the team to follow the pipes instead. Team moves north from crossroads following the pipes for almost 300 meters, taking several turnings in the process until the pipes continue through the wall of a dead end. Control informs the team that they should ignite the oxy-acetyl-tine torch and cut through the dead end. At this point ████ moves to the floor and lights the torch. D-5891 takes a position behind them with the pry bar ready, and D-832-1 moves back to cover the other two with the camera. Listen to the wall attempting to excise a hole large enough to step through. As he begins cutting, D-832-1 remarks that she believes she heard a noise behind them. The camera angle changes as she looks over her shoulder, revealing the corridor behind the team to be empty. Control requests she turn back and film the cutting. Has made an approximately one meter high cut into the wall when D-832-1 remarks again that she can hear something moving close by and begins looking around. D-5891 and ████ appear not to hear her over the sound of the oxy-acetyl-tine torch.  As D-5891 steps forward and inserts the pry bar into the cut, a loud roar is heard, apparently coming from behind the wall. D-832-1 screams and begins to back away, at which point the cut section of the wall is seen to bend outwards, pushed by something from behind. At this point the video feeds become confused as D-832-1 attempts to flee and the camera is unable to compensate for her rapid movements. Audio transmission is also unreliable due to the interference and screams of the team. It appears that a large indigenous lifeform comes through the hole cut by ████ and assaults the team. Gunfire can be heard, presumably from ████'s sidearm, along with screens from D-832-1 and D-5891. The audio logs also record a loud bellowing, which is currently unidentified but resumed to be made by the lifeform. Video stills reveal that ████. Subject D-832-1 manages to return to the entrance of SCP-432, injured in a state of extreme mental distress. See exits SCP-432 and, before technical staff can stop her, pulls out the weight holding the door open and shuts SCP-432. When the door is reopened, the internal layout has changed and D-5891 and technical assistant ████ are presumed lost. Subject D-832-1 is removed for debrief after which she is terminated. During debrief is discovered a large tuft of animal hair is caught in the harness of D-832-1's equipment pack. The hair is removed for analysis. SCP-432-5, date ████. Expedition Supervisor Dr. T. Smalls. Subject is D-887. Male, 19, athletic physique. Subject's background shows a history of gang violence and murder. Subject is equipped with standard mission equipment pack and sent into SCP-432. Camera is activated and subject enters SCP-432. The door is held open by a 3kg weight placed inside the doorway with technicians on hand to remove the weight and close the door if required. Camera activates showing subject is in a short corridor constructed from the same corroded metal as the exterior of SCP-432, which terminates in a T-junction at approximately 10 meters. Tunnel is notable to previous expeditions that there are no lit bulbs on the wall. As subject moves forward, he remarks that there are the large quantity of broken glass on the floor of the tunnel. Subject switches on its torch and proceeds towards the T-junction. Then proceeds left and instructed by control after marking his route. Subject moves through SCP-432, taking turnings as indicated by control. During this time, the subject is careful to mark his route using marker chalk and makes routine reports to control describing any visual or audio impressions of the structure. Subject reports that he can hear occasional, distinct machine noises through the walls, and that the interior of SCP-432 is quite cold. After 45 minutes, subject has traveled approximately 2500 meters through the structure. Video audio interference is minimal, and subject has carefully marked his route through SCP-432 with marker chalk. So far, all the wall-mounted light bulbs observed in this section of the structure have been broken. Subject stops to take a drink from a bottle of water or consume a ration bar. After resting for a few minutes, subject continues and, after taking a turning to the right, encounters three objects on the floor of the tunnel. Subject stops and illuminates the objects with its torch revealing them to be two crumpled food cans of one bent tin fork. The cans are partially corroded and seem to be quite old. The labels are of a familiar brand of canned beans. Control asks the subject to place the items in his equipment pack for analysis. Subject continues onward, but after 40 meters stops and informs control, he can hear something. Control requests clarification, and D-887 remarks that he could hear a faint sobbing or crying emanating from somewhere nearby. Control asks if the crying is male or female. The subject responds that it sounds male. Audio pickup fails to register the sound clearly. Subject is currently stood at a T-junction, and control instructs D-887 to move in the direction of the crying. Subject takes the left-hand passageway, moves 30 meters down the connected corridor, takes a right turn and follows the corridor in our 22 meters, proceeds straight ahead at a crossroads and continues for 37 meters. Video interference has begun to increase, and control cautions the subject not to proceed too quickly. Subject complains that darkness within SCP-432 is hampering his efforts, then shouts, Hello? Can you hear me? I'm coming. Control admonishes D-887 for shouting and informing him he may attract attention to himself. Subject asks, What else is in here then? But control informs the subject to continue along his current route and locate the source of the crying. Subject stops the next junction and pauses to listen. Audio picks up a drawn-out moan or scream, apparently human on origin, after which the crying ceases. Subject swears and asks if they heard the scream, stating it sounded very close. Control asks subject to proceed forward, and subject complies that though slowly attempting to move with as much stealth as possible. After 20 meters, the passageway turns right. Subject moves around the corner cautiously. The camera reveals the passageway ends in a dead end. Subject approaches the wall and places an ear against a metal. Subject backs away from the wall hurriedly hissing at expletives. Control asks what he heard, and subject whispers, There's something behind the wall. I can hear it crunching on something. Subject makes repeated whispered requests to exit SCP-432 immediately. Control confers with Dr. ██████ who agrees to recover the subject. Control confirms the subject may begin retracting his route, which he does so at increased pace. Subjects egress from the structure is uneventful, although the subject keeps looking over his shoulder and requires repeated verbal encouragement from Control to prevent the onset of panic. Subject returns from SCP-432 after a total expedition time of 1 hour and 47 minutes, and is sent for debriefing. SCP-432 material is recovered. All documents contained in this file are Class II clearance requiring two signed approvals to access. All the following items have been recovered from within SCP-432 during the █████ to date. Leaves. Discovered in Exhibition 1, 12 leaves in total, 3 oak, 4 ash, 2 rowan, and 3 maple leaves. All leaves are dry and crumbling and exhibit signs of extreme age. Footwear. Recovered in Exhibition 2, a single left sports shoe made from rubber and canvas with the ██████ logo on the ankle. The branding and manufacturing style dates to the shoe to 1982. The shoe shows signs of heavy use, frayed laces, worn soles, and scuffed toes, and is caked with a fine layer of earth and rust. Dried blood. Recovered in Exhibition 2, scrapings from a large dried bloodstain. Tests have confirmed the blood is human, male, type O positive. The blood is too old and degraded for DNA reconstruction. Animal hair. Recovered in Exhibition 4, a large tuft of matted brown animal fur with a large clump of skin cells attached to the roots. The hairs are approximately 13 cm long, stiff in course, and smell extremely unpleasant. DNA analysis has praised the creature in the order ██████ family, although noticeable irregularities in the DNA profile exists, suggesting ██████ food tins and fork. Recovered in Exhibition 5, two crushed and empty cans of ██████ baked beans with meatballs of ██████ fork. The cans have apparently been opened with a church-key type can opener and contents consumed. Dried residue confirms the contents of the cans to have been ██████ baked beans with meatballs. One can contains traces of human blood mixed with the food sauce, as well as small traces of human tissue. The blood and tissue is mixed with the food sauce and the manager suggests it was added to the food prior to consumption. The fork is stamped from 10, and of a manufacturer and style consistent with 1940s Army-issue mess kits. It is bent and scratched in places as commensurate with extended use. The tines of the fork are covered with dried food sauce consistent with ████ baked beans with meatballs, as well as traces of human blood and tissue.