I guess I should unmute there for the beginning, but welcome everybody to another episode of Office Hours, where we'll be discussing all things Microsoft 365 and answering questions from the community. My name is Christian Buckley. I'm an Office Apps and Services MVP and a Microsoft Regional Director, and I'm on the Microsoft Go-To-Market Director at App Point. Joining me today, and I'm going to try and go by order of the dam and joined this, but we have, so Neil Hoskinson was first to the lineup here, but dialing in all the way from Kim Kuhn, it's rough to be Neil today, this week, or the next two weeks. What on earth is he doing here? Yeah, then we have Mike Nelson, a solution architect at Pure Storage and a cloud and data center management MVP based in Appleton, Wisconsin. We also have Hal Hostetler, a senior field engineer with Roland Shorten Tower in Tucson, Arizona, and an Office Apps and Services MVP. We were then joined to take the order, yeah, Sherry, then a Microsoft Certified Trainer, Microsoft Office Master and Co-Founder for Power Up Learning in Colorado Springs, Colorado.   I'm still salivating too much, so apologize for that stumble. We might have Eric Riz and or Mark Rackley join us later. I think Sharon's out. I'm not sure if Tracy's gonna make it, but we'll move forward, we'll do our best. How's everybody doing? Yeah. It's Monday. I was doing better on Friday. It's always Monday when we connect and talk and do this. Right there. Yeah, I suppose so. I had a great weekend, I could relax in Cancun, but now I'm working in Cancun for a week. Well, probably till Friday morning. The life of a Microsoft consultant. I'm not a consultant.  The life of a Microsoft employee. Change, but find a scene, what's a good scene for? So I kind of like the space, the UNSC, there we go. Do you know why you're working in Cancun, Neil? Because you can. Sorry, say again, Sherry. Why are you working in Cancun? Because you can. Because I can. Because you can, right? It's actually cheaper to book two weeks in the vacation resolve than it was to book one. Oh, wow. I thought, okay, that works. So discount with our travel club thing. So if you increase the amount of time that you're in Cancun, does it get cheaper and cheaper until eventually they're paying you to live? Does that work? Paying to Pliny. I can ask. Yeah. Yeah, just if you stay for four weeks, will it be half the cost? Just as I said. Is that homework? Yeah. Anything else going on this week? Anything else exciting happening? No, you just had RD get over with it last week, didn't you? That's right. So I had the MVP summit two weeks ago, RD summit last week. And yeah, some really good sessions. There were, you know, a number that were duplicates of the MVP summit, but the ones especially that were RD led on kind of special topics. I mean, it's just always fantastic. We had a great session. Obviously I can't get into details of any of the stuff that we went through, but there were good sessions at both events around community development, community building and support for conferences and webinars and hybrid events and that kind of stuff. So it's always great to hear from other experts out in the field. Yeah. Yeah, I don't know how everyone else is, but you know, since a lot of conferences have gone virtual, I find it very hard to a lot time and stick to it to catch conference sessions. Yeah. I mean, I've got like high priority client work and it just trumps things. And I can't, you know, that physical act of going to a location actually got me enough distance, both mentally and physically, that I could focus on the conference, but I can't seem to do that anymore. Yeah, I would agree with that. And one of the points that came up, we were having a discussion just about this last week because a conference that we're actually putting on was like going virtual and folks were like, it's not the same, you know, it's really hard to be able to do this for three days straight. So we're splitting it up over three or four hours per day, but it's going to stretch over two weeks rather than just, you know, and to be honest, I got asked to do a session for, and there's a PowerShell, the PowerShell Summit, I don't know if you're familiar with that, but it's a big thing that happens every year. Sounds cool. Yeah, it's actually a replacement for Microsoft, used to have it, now a group runs it out of Minnesota, but the PowerShell and DevOps Summit.  Yeah, so to register, it's a fee. And my question was, it's gotten to a point now where, you know, for a virtual event, you're charging people for the rights to view your content after the fact. And I said, you know, a quote on Twitter came out and said, it's pretty much just like Netflix. So virtual conferences are turning into Netflix that you're paying ahead of time to be able to watch the content after. You know, and to me, that makes very little sense in my mind, it just says, otherwise what are you paying for? What, I mean, there's no special access. There's no, you know, events like live music and places, you know, all the stuff that you get when you're an in-person event. And no swag. No swag. Yeah. A per view power show. Exactly, exactly. So I'm trying to understand the justification for charging for something like that. And so far, everybody I've talked to, they really haven't given me any valid reasoning. I mean, it's not, to me, it's not valid. I hear you, Mike. I don't know if anybody else has any opinions on that, but it just, it was, it got to an actual argument. So it was quite interesting. Well, Mike, do you want to take us through? Do you have any community center updates? Of course, I do, Chris. We don't want Chris to do it again. Yeah, how did it go? How did it go, by the way? It went beautifully, Mike. It went over like a lead break. All right. We'll have a couple of garlic think buses if anybody needs one. All right, folks, I'm back. We're going to be talking a little bit about SharePoint. First of all, my favorite topic, not. And the thing about it is that they've come out with SharePoint release that will give scenario based site templates.   You usually have to end up paying, really, really, really, really smart people like Sherry and Sean, a lot of money to create a really cool site for you. And I'm just giving them a hard time. I don't mean that.  So communication site templates, you can go department, leadership connections, learning central, which I think will be a big hit because a lot of folks use SharePoint for the learning aspect. Employee onboarding, showcase, spotlight, an event. So if you have an event, you can spotlight it. Otherwise people were just using the basic, I think it was a blank or something or a basic or a team site. Yeah, then they'd have to take widgets out and the web parts out and they'd have to move things around and all that other kind of stuff. They've also created team site templates for event planning. I think they've always had a project management one, but they say project management here. Training in courses, training in development and team collaboration. So I think this is kind of big, especially for folks that are just trying to create a cool site that matches what they're trying to do. And I think it took a little bit too long for Microsoft to come out with this, but I think it's good. So the one question I have is, how's it different than the FAB 40? Then the FAB, what is the, I don't know what the FAB 40 flashback. Microsoft came out with 40 combination of site templates, add-ins, things like that, that gave you many pre-canned functions on top of SharePoint. So like project management, expense tracking, all sorts of things like that. The only problem became when somebody went to upgrade, the FAB 40 did not upgrade, or at least you'd need to do a lot of work with it. So it's kind of- It was too much scripting, it was too much scripting behind the scenes, it didn't upgrade yet. And just for, in defense of Microsoft around it, when they released that, they told everybody that that was going to be the case, that it was a temporary fix. People have been pushing- Well, they never meant it. They never meant it before, why now? Well, I put a link in the chat about the SharePoint Lookbook. Have you all seen that? I mean, okay. So the Lookbook, I was looking at a couple of solutions for a project I'm working on right now, and I downloaded and they're like, install this on your site, it comes with all these web parts.  It's like, they're not the actual web parts or like placeholder content. Like, how is this helpful? Now I have to still build this. And I was about ready to scrap the project site that I was creating and was going to replace it with that. I'm glad I didn't scrap it because I'm like, oh yeah, I should have used this. And I'm like, I'm glad I didn't use this because there's no content in it. So yeah, it's pretty, but you have to know what you have to, how to build what they have, so. Yeah, and I think that this might be a little bit different because they're actually embedding this into the SharePoint online and mobile app. So it's like the default templates you got, they're just adding to the default templates. So my assumption is, it says it's embedded that once those are, if you upgrade, they'll get upgraded along with everything else. Obviously, I don't know the specifics around it. They're very vague about it. Maybe one of our SharePoint folks could find out more. I was just doing a search here. So this is a new announcement? Because I had breaking news for me. I was on vacation, so I missed it apparently. Breaking news, yes, yes it is. Okay, I'm gonna check it out. All right, so moving on, we're gonna talk a little bit about Teams. Everybody loves Teams. They have the organizational wide backgrounds. Now I know we've talked about this before in one of these little things that I do every time we get together, but it's kind of weird that they re-announced this. They tagged it as a new announcement, but I don't think it's really new, but I think what they did was they clarified it because now they're saying, in order for these organizational wide backgrounds, where you assign backgrounds that the entire org has to use, they're requiring an advanced communications license. So in order to use the organizational wide background, the only way you can is if you have an advanced communications license. So Teams free, no, you can't do it. You know, and some of these EDUs that don't have that license won't be able to utilize as well. I don't think that's a good thing. I think it's something that they should give to people for free.  You know, how big of a deal is that? But I guess, and I looked at the license and the license is like five bucks per extra per license. And that's a cost that some people just won't absorb. So. For some that's their entire Office 365 subscription cost. Yeah, exactly. Question for nonprofits. Yeah, they're don't even pay that much. Yeah, yeah. Just to me is something that is just so trivial that it should not cost anything. But I don't know the reason why. We're also gonna allow anonymous presenters and team live events. Why?  I don't understand that at all. Sure, they so be blacked out. Has the black box just over their eyes? Yeah. Yeah, the entire face. I mean, I understand like the capability of being able to add in people that weren't the, you know, specified at the beginning presenters. And if that's the intention, I don't know what other controls are in place. I mean, if I could go in, if I have a meeting and I've got, you know, Mike, you and I are presenting and we see that, hey, Hal and Sean are in there and be able to let's add them as presenters. Well, I get that ability. You don't have that ability now. So it's not anonymous like we don't know who they are because that's just makes no sense. I think it means anonymous mean not pre-established as a presenter. Well, and you very well maybe right Christian, but there is no definition in the, in the notification that this, you know, of this feature being rolled out. So all they're saying, all they're saying.  Yeah, yeah. I mean, it's very vague, you know, your meeting organizers will now be able to schedule an anonymous presenter for a Teams live meeting when using the Teams desktop app. The anonymous presenter must also use a Teams desktop app. To me that's, it's very vague. I think you could be very right. I don't know. Anonymous meaning they don't have an account in your tenant. There's a few different flavors of anonymous there. Yeah. Yeah. All right. I like the backstripe and the garbled voice scenario. The garbled just lower the... So anyone in witness protection could actually present a live event. Anyone know that? That's right. That's right. That's right. Getting back to backgrounds a little bit. You can get customized backgrounds in Teams meeting. His video is coming to mobile devices. So this has been one of the most asked for things on the roadmap for Teams is being able to add, you know, some kind of background for a mobile device because you never could do that. So now you can walk around with your phone and be on a Teams meeting and it's gonna be all, whatever background you want behind you, which I think is gonna be kind of weird because depending on where you go, I don't know. I'm not convinced that this is something that's gonna play out well for some people, but we'll see. When I'm dialed in on my phone with a lower bandwidth connection, what I want to do is use up more of that bandwidth. Yeah. Yeah. So not really. Exactly. So I don't know, I got a question for the group. Did anyone here know that OneDrive, the OneDrive application that you load on your desktop has always been just a 32-bit app? It's never been a 64-bit app. I did not know that. So now they've actually released a 64-bit update and OneDrive will be 64-bit. Now I always thought OneDrive was 64, but so that's kind of a big deal because they're talking about speed enhancements and everything being 64-bit native. So do we have to do something to move over to that version? It's in preview right now. So if you want to jump on it, you can download it and install it. Otherwise it'll be rolling out and it'll be a sync app update. So it'll automatically pull OneDrive out and then drop the 64-bit in. Well, one person just run the 32-bit app two instances of it. There you go. It says twice as good. So if I run four instances, then it should just be twice as fast. Now I was just gonna suggest that one person who I know I saw a post out in some of the Facebook communities, Hans Brender, who's an MVP, who's kind of Mr. OneDrive. Mr. OneDrive, yeah. And so he had an article, I didn't read it. So I remembered that at one point that I knew it was only 32-bit when I saw his post. So I was aware of that update, but that would be a great place to go with questions. So I'll probably get back to Hans and ask if there's anything else I need to do to be prepared for to make them move over to 64. Cause usually it's a separate application and usually with things like that, there's like no migration path. It's just a different application. Right. Do you remember at a time when Microsoft recommended that even though you were running a 64-bit Windows, they recommended just using 32-bit Office app? Yeah, 32-bit Office had a lot more features to it and things, left things that were broken from the 64-bit version of Office. Right. So then they changed that story a little bit, right? And they started saying, oh yeah, you can use 64-bit. It's the same as a 32-bit, but that meant for specific applications, obviously, because the OneDrive stayed 32-bit, but like Word and Excel and PowerPoint and so on and so forth, all 164-bit. Prior to that, we had the thunk layer for 16-bit. Yeah. 32-bit. Yeah, exactly, exactly. All right, lastly, something that's in development that showed up on the roadmap, which I think is like uber cool and has a lot to do with authentication. So in Azure Active Directory right now, you can do a authentication that allows just to be IP-based, right? So you can say that this user can only log in from this IP address or this group of users can only log in from this IP range, if you will. Now they're actually adding to that and what they're doing is they're allowing for GPS. So you can say that in this conditional access policy, you can say this group of people or this person can only log in if they are in this GPS-coordinated area. So like geolocation, right? They have to be physically in this branch office in order to connect to Azure, okay? And that is huge when you think about it, saying that, well, the only way you're gonna be able to work on this project is you have to be in the office or you have to be here at this location and that's the only way that you'll be able to connect. How are they gonna implement that? They're using name location GPS. So they're actually using GPS coordinates. They have to allow location services on the device you're using and it'll coordinate where you are from a GPS perspective and say, yep, they're within the parameters. So they can give it a allow or deny to, I shouldn't say to access, but to the objects or the resources. That's wild. Yeah, it is, really. This reminds me of back in my telecom days and back with Pacific Bell Wireless before they rebranded a singular. So in our office, they is basically you walk outside the building with your mobile, your company phone. And there was a dead spot or ring around the building and they did that too. Yeah, that's geo-fencing, yeah, yeah. And right now, this thing is only gonna be, just so everybody's, I'm clear on this, is that it's only gonna be available if you use the Microsoft Authenticator app, all right? Because that Microsoft Authenticator app is gonna supply that GPS information. That's in the initial deployment of this. It is being, the plan is to upgrade that in the short term to be able to allow any device like a laptop or a desktop, anything that has location services on it. Awesome. Well, thanks, Mike. Hey, Mike, and I just thought too, can you send me just the, each of the items that you went through and we'll include them, we'll line item them in the blog post as well. Yeah, no problem. So for anybody that's watching, of course, there's, you'll be able to go out and we'll have the recording of this entire session out on YouTube later, and it'll be in a blog post on buckleyplanet.com, but in each of those locations, you'll be able to see an itemized list of every topic, every question that we cover and we answer. We're attempt to answer, and which is a good time for the disclaimer. Yeah. That we attempt to answer some things. There we go. That reminds me, Dave, you highlighted Joel's thing that I sent to you guys in email about the telephony question. I saw that notebook. So what? You didn't get that Christian? What were you talking about? Mike sent us out. I sent you and Sean an email, Joel, is it Joel? What's his last name? Joel Olson. Olson, yeah, he is running a webinar to answer any telephony questions around M365. I didn't see that. Oh, that's awesome. We thought we might promote that since we don't answer any telephony questions. We'll need to hijack. We'll need to get in there with a bunch of really messy telephony questions. But yeah, no, hey, a couple of the videos that I did where I pulled in some of the telephony, the Skype MVPs are some of the most viewed of my video interviews. So people, there's a certain, certainly a desire for answers around telephony questions. So. I'm glad they're getting them somewhere because it ain't here. Yeah. And I think I kept this one telephony free, but this week's community questions here in episode 55, we're gonna kick things off with a team's question from Pablo, who says, I administer a 100 plus person team. Someone deleted a channel that I was lucky as able to restore. I have a setting that doesn't allow members to do that. So it must have been an owner. There are eight of those. How can I see who deleted the channel short of asking them all? Is there an audit log I can see? Somebody wants to invoke wrath of God. So there are in Compliance Center. I believe it has that info. I don't have it open. I'll put it, I'll put a link in the chat. Okay. How to view the audit log. Oh, then it got, oh, I see Mike, the telephony had as well. The trick on the audit log is it has to be enabled first.  I'm gonna go turn on the audit log and then find out because it doesn't back track it. It's from that point forward. So. But at least at this point, it's a unified switch versus per workload. I don't have to turn it on and off. I defer to you. John on the technical side, thank you. I know where the on button is, that's about it. Yeah, so that's one of those things. And of course it's that capability is augmented by third-party tools that make it easier to go in and set up and to turn on and off features like this. But so yes, Mike, if you have the auditing capability, if you have that turned on, you should have visibility into who deleted a channel. Who done it? It used to be, he had to turn the audit log on by PowerShell only for him correctly, but I'm not sure if that's still the case. That's to double check that in order to get the compliance reporting and that kind of thing to come through. Right. Yeah, well, assuming that if you have eight admins, if you're that big of an organization, hopefully you're tracking that kind of thing. If not, you need to quickly kind of go in and assess your entire environment. If you don't have that turned on for that large of an organization. He didn't say admins. He said owners. True. Which, you know, and share point, of course, is all the difference in the world. Well, if someone has the ability to delete, it should be able to log that event and track that. Yeah, oftentimes auditing is your only true course of knowing who did what, especially for permissions changes. And here's an interesting thing too. Just a thought, if you're in an organization and someone's done this and the admins reached out saying who did it and nobody fesses up and is that what's going on here? It's like, I'm just going to have to go in. I'm going to log in. I'm going to find it. If it's being tracked, if the auditing has turned on for the organization, they're going to know who did it. Why would you hide that information?  I accidentally deleted it. Well, you could fake them out, like my parents used to do and say, I know who did it. We're just waiting for you to fess up. And then somebody says, yeah, and see who reacts to that. And then you know who did it. But yeah. And then flinched. You've had children, Sherry. That's kind of the experience. That's right. Well, I had my kids completely convinced. I could see every text message they sent. And it's because I used to make them put their phones in my office at night. And then I knew all their passwords. They didn't know, but I couldn't see everything. I did because they had to, in order to charge it, it had to be in my office. Yeah, that's funny. All right, question number two, Joseph Assa. We're trying to keep our critical issues at a minimum. And one of them is keeping office 365 up to date. Most of our office updates will run perfectly fine automatically. However, a select few will often get stuck and will need an admin account to allow the update, meaning we have to keep logging onto devices and updating them manually each week. Why do some of these updates and as the small few users get stuck randomly? Permissions, confused. Pretty much has to be permissions. Yeah. Well, I'm confused. Don't go exactly where. Yeah, because office works in the context of the user. It doesn't work in the context of an administrator. Everything is based off of current user. So I don't, I'm trying to understand why some users would get stuck and others would not. It has nothing to do with an administrator permission. Well, do office updates go through the Windows Update service? No, no. Because that's kind of a privileged context. Okay. No, they do not. They have their own channel. They have their own distribution. So it's, that's what I'm confused about. I mean, I can understand that they're having problems. Maybe they locked down the specific users or certain users to a point on the machines where they can open up a browser. Maybe it's in kiosk mode or something like that. I don't know, but. That was my first thought. I said, if there's another profile, they're logged in a different profile. But still, the update is to their profile. Yeah, it's based off of their user permissions when it's installed. Now, if an admin installed the office as a custom setup and maybe had something in there that was custom created, it's possible that the user cannot update that. Because you know, you can do a custom office setup and add your own stuff to it, obviously, so. Yeah. That sounds like the likely scenario here. It's just weird that it would be some users and not all. I just, I'm not clear on that. I mean, I've had users they don't trust and they've been, they've had their permissions yanked. Yeah. All right, question number three. D asks, can someone tell me if there's a way to change the text size in the little dialogue boxes? I'm not even sure if I'm using the right word. I'm talking about the little boxes that open up when you go to the main search bar and type in something like paragraph settings. I'm visually impaired and I can't read what they say. These have access. Windows 10 needs to have access. There's a link in the chat board. She's visually impaired. I would think she probably would know about that, but. There's a quick one, of course, being shortcut cherry. Windows plus will temporarily magnify whatever's on your screen and then you can window minus and that will reduce it back. If you don't want to, it's just one thing that you can't see at a certain time. But if visually impaired, I put a bunch of links for you for the different options. Or zoom it. Sysinternals. Oh yeah, zoom it's good too. I recommend for everybody, regardless of what they're doing or they need the magnifying glass, get the Sysinternals tools, because there's a number of very handy dandy things in there. It's a free download from Microsoft. Now that they acquired it from Microsoft. Yeah, you don't even have to, and Bruce too, but you don't even have to download it. You can run it online now. You can run any of the Systernals online. Yeah, but I threw a link in the chat. Yeah, no, that's cool. I will. So these are these, I just learned something there. Are these Windows toys? Like I found the color picker and I'm very excited about that. The power toy. That's a power toy. Yeah, that's different than Systernals.  It's more around functional utilities. And there's a couple, I guess, like BG Info and stuff like that would be considered kind of toyish, but they're really utilities. Yeah, for detecting process problems, memory issues. Auto runs. I use auto runs. Auto runs is a good one, yeah. As well as permissions.  I've seen presenters use them at this, I didn't know where it came from. I think you can download it, but. They're invaluable, yeah. Yeah, Process Explorer is my tool of choice as a PFE all the time. Yep. All right, question number four. Shalundra says, is there any way to restore deleted SharePoint 2013 designer workflows? The first thing you should notice is that it says designer 2013. SharePoint 2013. What year is it? It's 2021. It's a very old product. It's a valid question, not in respect, though. Invalid because of the supportability, but if it doesn't work, you're not gonna get it. The key thing with SharePoint 2013 designer workflows is did you save it as a template before you published it? If you did, you can republish the template. Now, the question is you probably can't pull back the state of any existing workflows that were in flight when you deleted it, but you could certainly get the workflow process back, but you must have packaged it as a template in order to do that. If you didn't, you're done. Or if you've got a backup tool that happens to grab the workflows, those are always kind of dark art things, but those are the other way. Potentially. Yeah, because it's, yeah, if you had, I guess, yeah, it's the scope of the backup, whether it included whatever that is, where that is, and how recently it was deleted. When I worked at IDERA, the initial backup application for SharePoint that they wrote did a custom object model walk, and they would pull as much as they could, but they didn't get 100% coverage because the workflow exposure is very hit or miss, so. You could get XAML, but not instance data and all kinds of stuff like that. All right, jumping over to question number five from Josh. I have a document library with roughly 100 documents, each representing an employee record. I would like to know what is the most efficient way to apply item level permissions to these 100 documents? So that, and Sean, we're getting answers out of the facial, like, even before we get there. Well, let me finish the question. So apply the most efficient way to apply item level permissions to these 100 documents so that each employee only sees their file, but without having to manually apply permissions to each document. So we get a variation of this kind of question, like every single week. Take a breath, Sean, take a breath. Write a flow or Power Automate. I mean, if you wanna do it automated, you're gonna need to run it in the context of an admin or a privileged user, but they could assign the, look at who the employee is, assuming you've got a consistent way to look them up and set permissions that way, but per item permissions, 100 documents isn't nearly as bad as it could be. If you were saying 5,000, 100,000 documents and you want item level permissions on them, I'd say there's gotta be a better, more performant way to do that, but. So you can build a script, I mean, you can have a Power App, so basically script it as part of your new employee onboarding process that it goes through a number of steps and assigns unique permissions to this doc as it's created or creates the doc on the fly, you complete it through a form, dumps the information into that doc and it applies to permissions. It's an interesting one, because all along that path, there's various points in time, which you upload the document, then you set the permission. There's a short period of time at which that document's gonna be open and inherit from the document library. Now I'm not saying anyone's gonna be specifically hunting for those documents or even gonna be quick enough to find it, but it's not 100% filled with what if someone else builds a flow on there that's running and looking for a Power App that's looking for documents with inherited permissions. Just takes one, someone, bit rogue. It almost seems to me like the permissions need to be somehow applied to the document before it moves. Like, you know, what was the, what was the, when we used to have the concept of the document center where you would upload a document to like a holding folder and no one else could see it except the system. And then the system would look at the metadata on the document and apply specific rules and then transfer it to the right location. If you wanna be super secure or I'll say super secure, wanna be a little bit more hardy then that's probably a way to do it. But I think as long as Christian and your description works perfectly well, as long as you've not got something else in there that's able to scan that or not upload, run Xflow or something, could be an issue. What was that old thing? Was it the drop-off library they did that? That's it. Yeah, drop-off library. Is it content organizer now? Content organizer. Yeah, something like that. I created an entire documentation solution around that and all the metadata. I did that for a client as well. Yep. And it was cool. Actually created a desktop icon and they would just drag docs and literally just drop them into that folder and they would get processed to some degree. So did that solve your insomnia, Sherry? No. Because stuff would get stuck in limbo because they would drag and drop and they wouldn't fill out the required properties and they'd be stuck and then I left that organization because I was a contractor and of course my account was the one that got the notifications and things were stuck in the queue. And I went back about four months later and there was like 10,000 notifications and I was like, somebody need to be looking at this account, you guys. So yeah. I just remembered, back when I used to do the, like 20 SharePoint features you should know or you probably should be using but don't or something like that. I had a variation of that presentation which I've had, it's funny, out of my uploads in SlideShare, I've had probably half a million views of just that, that deck and the several different versions of it. But yeah, the old drop-off libraries and the solution that I built around that, that was part of that. So that's going back 2010, 2011, 2012. Yeah, these were 2010, it was a 2010 environment. Yeah. Yeah, fun stuff. Very cool. All right. Question number six, Dallas asks, is it possible to embed report graphs from Dynamics 365 into a SharePoint online page? You can put anything on a page with a web address. Yeah, but under those transportable, can you consume them that way or do you have to, Ms. Orway, to dynamically add those, share those from Dynamics 365 or are you just grabbing images? No oblo, Dynamics 365. I second that. Yeah. Dynamics is the new telephony. I think the technical term for that is, no, yeah. Disclaimer. Disclaimer. You'd have to punch on that one. Yeah, oh yeah, I'm sorry. That's right, let me cue the disclaimer here. Sorry, Dallas. Of what year, the quality of the guidance that we're providing, occasionally. All right, question number seven, Andy. I'm trying to create a sort of virtual inventory of around 100 applications. That's that 100 number. We're just rounding everything to 100 today. Sort of virtual inventory of around 100 application forms with links directly to the different companies, PDF of the form application online. I was wondering, is there at all, possible to set up a page? Stop, stop, stop, emphasis now. Is there at all possible to set up a hyperlink email to with the PDF of whichever form on the cell, the PDF will also be a hyperlink before the email. This was, by the way, this question, if you can't tell, I think it was translated. So I don't know what the original language was. That's why it's a little bit odd in the wording here. I'm currently experimenting with several programs and so far I've already a list of all the forms already created. I know I can create the list of links that go to the app, but I would rather have a list of links where I can simply click email and it gets attached to emails. The email templates with the one attached to each one. That'd be tedious to create with 100 of them though. Yes, it would, but it would work. Yeah. Could be a PowerApp. Well, I did something similar with a SharePoint workflow and I put the preceding content for the link and then a unique identifier for a page. It was to filter for a page in SharePoint. So whenever they would add a record, I had a page that was filtered by that. And I don't know if you could do that and create a little calculated field that has it already in there. I don't know, I don't know. Probably not, probably not because it would have to attach it to an email, right? Yeah, I don't know, any way to correlate between each of the different documents to each of the different companies, you'd have to manually go and set that up. One time, the first time, set that up and then you'd have that automated link but there's not an automated way to go and do that a hundred times. Missed mail merge. Can we have one big shrug, a mogie? Like. Yeah. Yeah. All right, sorry. Well, at least we can capture you doing it, Mike and then that will be the professional picture. That's what we're missing here is we need to pull more memes of us like text. Text, above and below, so. Do that if an original screen shot you. All right, there we go. Okay, sorry, Andy. Jumping to question number eight with Harry. I'm going to be an admin of five Office 365 tenants. So right now, if we could all take off our hats and lower the flag to half staff for Harry, I'm so sorry. That means five logins, et cetera, et cetera. What is an easy way, an easy way to administer these tenants in Windows 10 using five edge profiles or five virtual desktops or is there an application to do that more easily? There's an application to do that more easily and it's built right into the admin center now. So they actually have multi tenant administration capability built right into admin center. So you no longer have to do anything outside of that. You can easily switch between tenants just by clicking up in the corner and selecting your tenant name.  Does it work well? Because I know in other like profile switching scenarios it doesn't seem to stick, it keeps reverting back. I don't know. Well, in the admin center I've done it. I have three tenants that I manage and I haven't had no problems with it. But I think it also uses the same basis that I don't know if anybody's familiar with Azure Lighthouse. It uses the same type of technology that Lighthouse uses to switch between tenants. So it's a little bit different than like profiles, anything like that. It's actually switching directly to the tenant context. So. And that's with three different accounts, Mike, or one account? No. Well, you log in once and then you have access to whatever tenants that you can administer just by hitting a dropdown in the upper left-hand corner.  There's a new account or does it always a single login is like a guest admin? Not gonna be a guest admin, well, like a super account that. Yeah. See, I have the same account. So I don't know because I use a control account. I use the dot on Microsoft.com with the company name for my three tenants. And I have the same login for all three tenants. So that's a good question. I don't know if you have different logins, maybe there is a problem with that. I don't know. Yeah, I know my McDonough online account, my Bitstream Foundry account, I've got a bunch of different, I'm still shown at that organization, but they're all entirely different accounts and I've got to log out and in. Oh, mine, I just flipped through them because I use this. Like I said, I use the same account for all of them. That makes sense to me. Log in, log out, you'd have to. Yeah. I don't know. I finally gave up on it trying to recognize how it was logged in and I created different profiles on my computer and I log out. As one user, I log in as the other user and then let it cache because then I tried to use Chrome and I was getting like my C drive was full. I'm like, I don't keep anything on my C drive and I realized all these Chrome profiles Profiles were bloating up my hard drive. So that was a new discovery a couple of weeks ago. So yeah, don't go crazy with those either apparently. My Plex server just chews up system drive space with all the stuff it throws into a profile. It's ridiculous. Yeah. It's like it's just a log in. They're just like passwords. It shouldn't be that hard, but yeah. So I'm intrigued though, Sean, for one little thing. I don't want to drag this one out. If you, let's see you're logging in with, you know, Sean at contoso.Microsoft.com, right? It's one of the better names. How can you have that Contoso domain registered with three different tenants? I can handle that. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I was just, you could be added as a guest. Correct. In those tenants. Yeah. Can I guess being admin? Yes. Yes. Okay. I can be. All right. That makes sense. So that's what I am. That's what I am. Is I have my on Microsoft.com account for all three tenants and I am a guest in two of those tenants and I am an admin, a global admin in those two as a guest. That makes more sense. I wasn't aware you could promote a guest to a global admin. Yeah. I don't think you've always been able to do that. Yeah. But they did add that. There we go. Yeah. Maybe there's a component of making this feature work. I guess it must have been, how to have been. Yeah, but it's still not as seamless as I think everyone would like it to be. It is a bit of a hassle to log in and out. In instances where you need to do that. All right. Question number nine, Murray asked. I have come across an issue whereby site admin with full control that have synced to their local drive are not able to edit files whether they are checked out or not. It seems to be similar to the forum post provides a link to that link there. I have read through the issue and other sites but not yet been able to establish how to resolve this issue. Is it a checkbox that has missed when syncing to the local drive or is it a permission state that needs to be changed? Or is it simply that site admin should not sync to their local drive? Going everybody speak up at once. Yeah, really. No. All I can think of is when you try to save to a local and it says you don't have permission to save here when you try and save to the desktop wherever they're syncing to. It must be blocking them from being able to save that to that local drive folder. I don't know. I wasn't going to say anything, but y'all were quiet. So I thought, well, I'll throw this out there and see what happens. Yeah, I've had my own issues with file sync. And again, like four or five different accounts that I actively have running with different OneDrive storage. And it's not as simple as just being able to go to a location because there's synchronization with online. And then there's the local cache and copies live in various different places. When you use it with SharePoint, for instance, that local working area is slightly different. So I do not feel qualified to even comment on this. I mean, I've had a similar issue where like the sync was still active. It was like underway. And so it would limit my ability to go in and edit. I could read, but I couldn't edit because the sync was underway or something. I don't know. It was just, you know, went back a couple of hours later and had no problem getting to those files. I wonder if they use the, you know, right click on it and say, always keep on this device. Maybe it's sitting in the files on demand and that they didn't get demanded yet. I don't know. Well, to work with it locally, you would have to, even if it's just in the cache. If they're using the desktop client. Right, yeah. So I go to the C user profile, one drive, go to that root folder and then try and right click and say, always keep on this device and maybe that'll push it, nudge a little bit. Good morning. It's Monday, give me coffee. I don't know. It seems like this kind of day, I don't know. Christian setting us up for failure with these questions. It's like, now just think back again, Rackley's comment about, it's like, what's the deal with these questions? I'm like, I know Mark prefers the softballs, but hey, these are, these are for folks that are watching this, the recording of the live stream too, is that these are raw questions that we're pulling. We're not doing spelling correct on anything. I'm not changing the grammar of anything. I'm cutting and pasting these from a number of different Facebook community pages from, and there's actually seven or eight that are from Microsoft Tech community unanswered questions as well. So these are, that's the point is, is to do this at live events. We used to do the, you know, what the stump, the experts. We were chumps, stump to chump. Stump to chump. Stump to chump. Yep. Let's see, all right, question 10, Tom. Yeah, I'm just, do you see how smoothly I just moved on from Murray's question there? Question 10, Tom says, current setup as we have a Teams channel, including the channel calendar tab, meaning any event put in that calendar will be sent to every member of the channel, nice and easy. The problem is now that we're starting to have more in-person meetings and other kinds of external meetings, such as Zoom calls, the platform of which we shall not speak, that everyone in the channel needs to be invited to. By default, creating an event that calendar sends out an associated link for a Teams call, which adds some confusion when we're not actually intending to have a Teams call for that meeting. Is there a way of not sending out Teams call info for meetings created within the Teams app? And in particular for a specific channel, I suppose a workaround could be to create the meeting in the group calendar on Outlook and then inviting the group, but then you can't be channel specific, any help would be appreciated. Yeah, that's an interesting dilemma. So my, because that's my first response. If you don't, if you want to just do a meeting invite and not have them, then send it via Outlook. Yes. But the problem is then you can't dedicate that to specific channels, discussion, all the activity. It's an interesting edge case. Like how would you go about solving this? I mean, any other ideas? Well, meeting in a channel is a passive meeting anyway. You know, it just shows up. It doesn't actively invite people and they don't have to RSVP. If you send it through Outlook, it's there. I don't know. That's the only way is to send it through Outlook and put the actual link in there and not put it in the channel. I don't know. Why would you create it? Why would you create a calendar in Teams and then not use Teams for the meeting? That's what I think is weird. Yeah, it's kind of implicit. Yeah. My opinion. Well, if that's the place, yeah. Maybe that's part of the interpretation of the question. If they're using that channel calendar as the way to manage all the activities and they want it visible within that calendar, that's why they're using Teams to create all of those meetings. But if it's linked to a group, you should be able to create it in the group calendar. The problem is that it's not channel-specific. So there's a way of getting it to all the right people, but it's not the way that they work. Basically, what they're asking for, I think, is to, Sean, your point, is this edge case scenario where I create a meeting within Teams but I'm able to remove the online portion of that. I mean, my only other thought would be to put in the headline, put in the description of the meeting invite, like no team meeting or no online meeting, and just make it kind of the protocol of the company. When you see this, then that means that there's no team meeting. It's just... So Teams is hosting a party and it's not welcome at its own party. Correct, but then it would show up in the right calendar, all the members of the channel would see it and you'd have that benefit. If you're talking about a small subset of meetings, the majority of them are Teams meetings, then having that, it's like your naming convention for, where you add in a prefix or a suffix so that you have a standardized way of naming files. It'd be the same thing for meetings and just come up with a prefix for those that are created within Teams but not online meetings. Yeah, well, in channel meetings, you can't have external people, so maybe they're wanting other people outside included too, I don't know. I don't know. I read it as the core issue is managing centrally in that channel calendar and that would be the quickest and easiest workaround for that is add a prefix to the description. Yeah, I don't know if someone mentioned this, I got a bit distracted for a minute and I don't think this is even possible, but it might be a nice idea for a request. Imagine if you could use a channel calendar as like old school exchange resource and invite the channel calendar to a meeting that you sell via a different channel, via a different process, maybe through Outlook, like we used to do back in the day, right? Or invite meeting room, invite XYZ, whatever it might be. Invite the printer to the meeting. Yeah. Because then it'd show up, assume it would auto-invite, auto-accept, given the chat, well, I guess it wouldn't be busy. Because it's just a calendar. It might be an interesting thought, I just thought. Interesting. I have an interesting thought every now and again. Very few of them are related to IT. If you're allowed to share, yeah. Well, I know you just said Neil here for his good looks. You know. Oh, I was just going to add in, so a couple of comments over on Facebook with the live stream. So Keith Richie had been making some comments about Fab 40 and said, die, Fab 40, die. That is one of those. Yeah, and I just liked it. And Paul Swider just jumped in and he says, we need Fab 40 for Power Apps portals now. And then he put in ducking, you know, ducking. I love Paul. Asking for a friend. Asking for a friend. Asking for a friend. I had somebody make a reference to Clippy, you know, that if I'm 40 and Clippy are kind of in that same purgatory, I think there's more love for calm and not forgotten. Yeah, well, let's jump to question number 11. Tony asks anybody have any idea what is going on in the outlook for Android mobile since the last. Oh, hey, it's a telephony question sort of since the last few updates, a whole bunch of accounts don't sync. No notifications and random emails don't load in. Has anyone else seen that or is it? Is that a second device accounts across multiple devices? I don't know that it's systemic, Tony. Make sure you've got lots of room on your phone. Outlook for both Android and iOS are a bit of memory logs. Yeah. Yeah, I don't I don't know.  Well, I mean, I think this is more of a user specific problem that I kind of global. Yeah, I mean the only problem.  But, you know, that's a one time thing. And the only other question is have they updated it recently? You know, the app might be out of date and causing an issue.  You know, look for Android. So how many people are affected by this? Maybe there's been a patch recently. I don't know. That's probably stretching it. I don't use an Android sort of testing. Well, I have a number of reports of anything, so. Yeah, and I think there's some feedback somewhere. I update my apps periodically and some people don't. They don't know that you have sometimes you have to go in there and actually say, oh, there's 46 updates. Please. Yes. Thank you so much. So. They just install and forget. They set and forget. Maybe it's like, oh, no, 46 updates. Thank you, sir. May I have another? Thank you, sir. May I have another? Well, I had a Windows phone and I always said I loved my Windows phone. I still love my Windows phone, but apps stopped working, right? And before that, I was like, all I needed was tripping, you know, my outlook that, you know, I'm not an app junkie, but then I got an Android. Now I'm an app junkie. Like it's ridiculous. All the apps that are out there just to order food. Chick-fil-A, Panera bread. Yeah. Sorry. I didn't I didn't BK McDonald's. You name it. Yes, absolutely. Yeah, you used the water burger app last night. My husband and cheese and broccoli soup from Panera bread. It's fabulous. Yeah, we just went through the airport in Houston. My husband's never had a water burger. Like, oh, and I said, honey, this is like the In-N-Out burger of Texas. You got it. If we're here, you got to have a water burger. He liked it. So I'm getting hungry. It's my lunch time. Yeah, it's getting. Can we stop talking about food? Didn't have breakfast now. I'm just thinking, yeah, just if we're talking burger places, you know, so there's two that I highly recommend.   Twist my arm. I know it's rough. It's fantastic. But then I'm I'm a Carl's Jr. double Western bacon cheeseburger guy. It's like the it's like eating Wonder Bread, you know, a version of hamburgers. And it's just so unhealthy, but so delicious. I like the six dollar burger. My favorite there is the really big Carl. The six dollar burger with their bread and butter pickles. We're torturing Sean on purpose. My mouth is watering here. So good. I'm a burger. I'm a burger guy. So I just I just love that. Yeah, they open it in and out here. And they're the line is like people waiting two hours. I'm like, I'm sorry. There's no reason for the way two hours for a cheeseburger. You know, I love my in and out. I do, but not two hours worth. Oh, they're good. They're fresh. They're not the best burger, but they're they're tasty. They're and again, it's fresh tasting. Hate the fries.  Really? Shakes are good. Hate the fries. No, I don't like that. You got to do them. You got to do animal style.  And what they do dark is they they overcook them when they're dark. I need that. Oh, that's what I'm missing. I didn't realize that. OK, that's that's that's one of the off the menus. You got to you got to Google off the menu or the secret menu. Yeah. Yeah. OK, there are any hours around and the Neapolitan just love that place, Sean. I burgers back then, yeah, they were really good. They disappeared from around here. I don't know, but Rutgers will five guys kind of replaced. I know it's different, but it's replaced by breakfast. Five guys. You can't think in the middle. We did a 10 minute. Rutgers has great cheeseburgers. How did how did we get in the hammockers here? I blame Sean. My it's my fault. I was talking about I still blame you to stop. OK, let's jump to question number 12. Focus, people. Theo asks, does anyone have a method for forcing a SharePoint list to alphabetize by a certain column? I've done the A to the Z sort and SharePoint. But as I add new list items, the sort doesn't automatically hold. Also, I want the sort to appear similarly in teams. Is there a potential JSON based solution? You don't sort the list. You might sort of view, first of all, yeah, and then. That's specific to the view, right? Yeah, so. As you've added in, I mean, you're going to view it. It's also a default view. Yeah, you might have to refresh the window if you're on that view. Just hit refresh F F five is the shortcut. Yeah, and see if it fixes it. Otherwise, setting it to the Android. Are we missing something else of his request? Because that's the first thought. Yeah, that's a pretty basic place. Well, yeah, he's basically column sorting in the list view that he has not column sorting when he applies to that initial first time you click it. Hey, we answered a question. The thing is, I don't know if there's the same teams because I've got to go to my teams channel SharePoint list. The view, I don't know what views teams use. Shooter McGavin. They should use a default view, right? Yeah, default view. But isn't it isn't that relatively new that it can support the other SharePoint views, though? Now, that's a query string parameter. If you want a different view. So I think it's just teams, though, the teams client. I believe it until teams client. If you click on files, teams client and the channel, you can, or maybe you can, maybe there's a channel setting to choose a view. It's been a while. Yeah, you'd be, I think, sticking it some way to it. That's in that super secret Microsoft Teams application that Neil uses that has all the special features that regular people don't have. We're not a high enough rank in the mason's yet for that. Some of them you don't want. I did put a link in the chat for how to create views. So that helps whomever didn't know they could. It's always helpful. That's kind of it. So still look at the default view based on Sherry's response. Sherry's response, sorry. Yeah. So the question that stands is whether it will stick inside of teams. How does teams treat it differently? Or is this new ability, is it there? So I'm going to take it as homework. Because I read about it. I saw something. I couldn't find it. Just did a quick search. I'll go and track that down. In teams though, you have the views in the upper right-hand corner. So you can change your view, but I think it's grabbing the default view, by default. By default, yeah. Because that's default. It's just so random that they would name the default view and then that would show up that would have defaulted, I know. Department of redundancy. Crazy. All right, let's see. Question 13, Hillet says, hello, I'm building a SharePoint site. Mike, this question's for you, so listen in. I'm sorry, I'm speaking to the SharePoint question. In the site, there's a document library that contains different procedures. I would like to know if there's an option for every user that reads a procedure to mark that he was reading it. I thought to open a private list for every user that there he could mark all the procedures he was reading. Every record there will be related to a procedure from the library of the procedures. Is this possible? How can I open a private list for every user? I'm trying to figure out his business challenge here. Mike, is the fact that he wants people to acknowledge they've read it or that they've checked it out and they're reading it? I've got a learning system almost. Sounds like more of a workflow process than a SharePoint process. Yeah, the only thing is the SharePoint review workflow is what comes to mind so that you sign it to every person and then it would keep track in the workflow of who had actually done that. Mike, or Sean, I'm seeing you nod at my idea. I mean, that's one way to skin it, yeah. Because for SOPs, I've worked with many organizations before who just wanted to ensure that a document was reviewed by somebody and so they would want to track it that way for compliance purposes. So something like Power Automate or SharePoint workflow or something, just the approval workflow, like you said, SharePoint work as well. I hadn't considered that, but that's an interesting way to skin it where you would probably have very little extra work if you build a group of everybody in it and simply assign it to them. Yeah. Let's SharePoint do the heavy lifting. Yeah. Do they have the review workflow in modern now or no? They deprecated the 2010 workflows, right? They deprecated 2010. Yeah, 11 years later. So 11 years ago. Yeah, I know. Yeah, 2010. I'm over it. Totally, yeah. 2010's off now. So it's not an approval workflow. It was just like a review. So people had to review and say they, you know, and acknowledge they reviewed it. Yeah, it had its origins actually in WSS. It wasn't even a SharePoint workflow. It was a, you know, you had the three state kind of thing that you could set was real low level. Well, let's jump to question number 14. Alma says, is there a way to get a combined report for unique visitors of SharePoint online sites and Microsoft Teams? How do you get metrics of total SPO usage and MS Teams? Neal's got the answer. There you go, Neal. You got volunteer told. That was funny. Since I go tell the internet kicks me out every 19 minutes. Oh, that was weird. I'm not really sure if in the Microsoft M365 Admin Center, if they have reports for SPO, I don't think they, from a reporting aspect, I'm going into the Admin Center now. And I mean, it's usually just around compliance and security. So I don't think there's any native way to do it. SharePoint reporting has always been pretty crappy. Well, what you could do is, I mean, and I've done this, I've done this for clients, is take the, you know, you can export the raw data and bring it into Power BI. And you'll create your stuff there. Yeah, I mean, Power BI has the connector to pull that information. So it's easy to do. I'm in there right now and I can see that. I can separate out SharePoint and Teams data for the active users, activations, files stored, you know, all that kind of stuff. But I mean, if you want something that's more custom when you're talking around metrics of total SharePoint usage and MS Teams, is it, you know, combined report for unique visitors? You're not going to get that from, you know, the canned reports that they give you. Plenty of third party tools, but. Yeah, there are plenty, yeah. Yeah, I've seen it in TyGraph, so. Yeah. You know, this exact thing, but. But I mean, like I said, I've taken it, and just did the Power BI connector right to 365 and be able to pull the data and do whatever you want with it. Right, yeah. Yeah, all the activity reports, de-dupe it, then you'd have your unique users in that given time. Yeah. So, yep. All right, question 15. Puneet, is there a way to convert CSV to Excel in order to consume the file in Azure Data Factory? Is this a trick question? Yeah. Open the CSV file in Excel, save it as an XLS. Yep. I've done that before. Surely we're missing something. We are definitely missing something. Yeah, also ADF should be able to pull in CSV directs anyway. Cut out the middleman, sure. Couldn't I create a Power App that we could? Yeah, that too. Yeah, but what is it sourced by? Yeah. Mm-hmm. Yeah. So, yeah. So that's pretty easy problem to solve. Plus there's some other detail. That's sourced out. That's the question as posted. I have a hard time believing nobody else actually tried to answer that question. Unanswered question, Microsoft Team, Microsoft Tech Community. Wow. Maybe they thought it was a joke. Yeah. Or don't wanna get punked, I don't know. Question 16 from Christopher. Running into an issue, so very orderly in his question here, setting. So it's a document library with incoming email settings turned on. The problem, how to extract a particular string from the body of an email or how to extract the body of the email so that I can target that string. It's using SharePoint Designer 2013, on SharePoint 2016, have access to SharePoint 2010 and 2013 workflows and no third-party apps. Does designer support regular expressions in some form? Cause regex would be the thing to get at that. Most directly I'm thinking if there's any kind of variations, but I don't know if there's any step in designer in the workflows that supports regex. By the way, sorry, Keith just mentioned to you, 2010 ends today. The support ending today is April 12th? All existing instances explode. That would be cool. That would be cool. I would actually pay to watch that on a live stream. Yeah, really, might get your popcorn and just. Yep. April 13th, this is April 13th, 2021. All right, tomorrow, yeah. Keith cracked himself as well. Yeah, cause it wouldn't be good to end on a nice round number, the 13th. That's just that number just feels right. But it is Tuesday, Microsoft Tech Tuesday, right? Yeah, correct. Yeah, so any other thoughts on this question? Yeah, it's an interesting one. So we're saying how to extract a particular string from the body of an email. Is he looking for the same string from every email that's going into the document library to make sure it's present? Or is he looking for a different string each time? Yes. One of those things probably. Yeah, definitely one. Because you can use, you could potentially, if you just want to find does this item contain or do items in this library contain this particular string? Why don't you just use library search? Turns out he wants to do it afterwards because library search will tell him all the documents or the emails in the list that contain that particular string. Yeah, so it comes down to what does he mean when he wants to, what's the use for extractively? Another one of those examples of being able to ask follow up questions, clarify. So nice. And there's, if you imagine this scenario and this is imagine if you're, okay, this might get a little bit questionable. Just mute me if he does. It could be somebody looking for social security numbers, someone looking for credit card numbers with emails that have come in, people responding to them nefarious emails. You know, your Nigerian uncles left you $10 million, at least to me about details. I'm pretty sure it's not, Christopher, that's no disrespect. I'm pretty sure it's not that. I'm sure there's a genuine business case here, but we just can't really geek out what the business case actually is. You know, I've said this before, I'll say it again, when the Crown Prince of Nigeria reaches out to you personally for help, you help. Yeah, yeah. It's only $5,000 that he just needs temporarily to help him out of this jam. And then you get $10 million. Who would not go for that? All right. Question number 17, and how are we on time? Well, we've got a few moments. Ian says, is it possible to block guest access in teams and through SharePoint permissions only allow guest access for a single team for a small number of guest users? I'm not hopeful. That's a great way to round out the question. That really makes it easier to respond, you know, because we could just kind of like, oh, you know. I hope he's lost. Ian wasn't hopeful in the first place for any guidance or help, so. Block guest access in teams through SharePoint permissions. Number one, you shouldn't be messing with teams, especially not teams channels by modifying SharePoint permissions at the back end. That's not a good plan. Sometimes it might seem like the only plan, but it's not a good plan. Won't we allow access for guest access for a single team? It's all or nothing, isn't it? Yeah, it doesn't matter about granular. Yeah. Unless they had a separate tenant, were they allowed like a federated tenant that they would allow external access to? I know a lot of organizations do that. They don't want them in their real environment. They create like a .NET, so the .com kind of entity, show that one. Oh, it's like an old school DMZ. Yeah. Yep. Otherwise, yeah, I mean, if you have external access set up but just tightly control teams that can enable that as part of your provisioning process, for example, and then enable a team with external users that are possible. And if you want a further limit, then create a private channel within that externally accessible team, because only there's the limitation. It'd be great if you had a private channel that you could invite external people that don't have access to everything else, but you have to have access to the team to get access to the private channel. Yeah, it'd be good to have that either end, so you could have that private versus kind of, almost like public only. The shared channels resolve that? So I don't know what's been talked about publicly, what's the capability, but doesn't that resolve that? If I have a shared channel, and I think that with the shared channel, I think the thinking is, again, it's not out there yet, it's just being talked about whether the current thinking is that it's, you can have external people that aren't members of the team. I mean, that's the idea. You wanna be able to share it and communicate with people in other tenants. Yeah, I don't know, anyway. Yeah, don't know. Boy, we are so helpful today. So thank you for watching. I'm trying to think of any, is there any kind of conditional access policy that supports only like FT's versus guests? I don't know, teams there's a few of them, but I don't know whether they have that scenario. Might be worth a look. Well, if your users are defined, if your users and guests are defined outside of, I mean, in Azure Active Directory, which they have to be as part of 365, then you should be able to assign them separately in any app that uses Azure Active Directory. So what Neil is saying, yes, that definitely should be possible because AAD is the backbone of all the authentication for M365, so. Yeah, I'm just looking at it. To Shari's point earlier, I can see AAD premium licenses. There's a scenario under Matt Solzman's blog that talks about how to apply conditional access policies via Azure AD for teams, but it's an all on nothing scenario. You either have access to teams or you don't. You might need an Azure AAD P2 to do that as well. A P1 subscription may not do it. Well, I think we can squeeze in one last question here. Maybe we can provide some help here. Question number 18, Jesper. OMG, anyone here who are able to give some advice that is useful? Well, that, that bit. Yes, our number. Post-disclaimer, post-disclaimer. Says the issue, I had a free subscription in which I created a VM. I then had to change my security info to my mail and wasn't able to log into the Azure portal for 30 days. Contact Microsoft, no luck getting around the 30 days cool off. Anyhow, the 30 days cooled down and finished, but my free subscription has expired now. I can't transfer the resources because this subscription is disabled. Anyone who knows what to do. There are files I need to get from this VM. I was told by Microsoft that I could get access to my VM up until the 28th of April, which obviously wasn't true. Okay, so a couple of things going on here, right? Try and unpack this. First of all is that just by changing your email, okay, that is assigned to the free subscription account, you would absolutely be able to change that with Microsoft support. I've done it before several times. It does require a long authentication process to verify you are who you are, okay? But they will do that. And so I'm not really sure what steps were taken to get that. Obviously didn't go through the support first. What made the changes through whatever online automated capability? But even if you did it after the fact, support can then take the steps to authenticate you, which I've actually had to provide a driver's license at one point just to say I am who I am. And then they switched the account and I was able to access the account after that. So I don't know how far they took it. If they said, hey, I gotta get to whatever. The second part is that there's an automatic 30 day recycle bin on every resource, right? And so you have 30 days after the fact. Now, if you were matching up the free subscription time to the 30 day recycle on the BM, that should have probably told you that you're not gonna make it in time once you're at the cool off period happens. Now, I don't understand, I mean, I've heard of this cool off period. I've never experienced this cool off period, but I've always just had the account changed. So I'm not really familiar with that. But I just, I can't understand, even though it's a free subscription, it's you can tell Microsoft, improve to Microsoft, you are who you are. They're not gonna not allow you to get at whatever you created up in Azure unless they say, you cannot tell us for sure that you are who you are. So we can't give you access to somebody else's stuff. I can get that. But the thing that comes back to is about the free sub. Any free sub that's been disabled past the trial, okay? They're talking about a trial sub because you can get a free sub that lasts forever. You can create a VM and free subscriptions don't die, okay?  It's not a timeout period anymore, okay? So that and that went into effect. Yeah, that was back in early 2020, where they changed it where free subs lasts forever. You can always create certain things in free subscriptions. But the thing that I'm still not clarified on is that Microsoft or they should have researched it a bit and found out that you can take a free sub, switch it to pay as you go. And all of your stuff just magically comes back to you. I mean, everything that you created in the free sub will come back, even if it's up to the 30 day recycle time. So if you tell them that you have this subscription ID, you want to convert it to pay as you go, then they will do that.  So they still have the ability to do that. They probably still have the ability to do that is to open a support case with Microsoft, give them the subscription ID and say that they want to convert it to a pay as you go. And Microsoft looks that up to see if the data is still available.  All right, we'll think, you know. Yeah, that's great. Well, we're at time. Thanks for that detailed answer, Mike. And thanks everybody else on the panel for joining today and those that watch in the live stream or on the recording. Again, we'll be back next week. Some of us will, some of us are bailing again, Neil. But he's dead on Cancun, so it's understandable. But we'll be back every Monday at 8 a.m. Pacific. And again, this episode 55, it'll be up on YouTube in the next day as well as at unbuckleyplanet.com. You can find all of our past recordings there as well. And every one of those blog posts have, every question that we've answered, we've responded to. Sometimes I tweet out individual responses with links back, but so you don't have to wade through all 90 minutes of the recording. You can actually jump right to the topic that is of interest. Or you can listen to the entire thing and get all that fascinating talk about hamburgers. Yeah, yeah. Good stuff, I know. Yeah, it's the hamburger edition. Well, thanks a lot, everybody. We'll see you guys next week. Have a great week, everyone.


I've just been told, like, I just need loads of protein. Piece of piss, mate, I don't even know. He's unimaginable, he's unimaginable. But I have to eat a lot, because I've got a fast metabolism. How many calories do you have? 5,000. 5,000?  No, it's a 2. I'll just drink it point-a-mill. I can build my muscle without the bodies of animals who'd suffered for it. Maybe I just don't care enough. I don't know, I don't know. Well, steak's supposed to be a superfood, so I've been told, like, everyone's dreaming on to me in the bodybuilding world, they reckon steak's proper superfood. I'm asking people why they're not vegan. I watched your podcast the other day with Tristan. Oh, did you? Yeah, a lot. Had a few people come up and say that, eh? Yeah, yeah. Did you watch the whole thing? I did, yeah. Okay, cool. Did you agree with Tristan? Um, some things. Just put up front there, okay. I agree with some things. Did you agree that, you know, not to care about, like, animals in those factors? Well, yeah, like you were saying, like, I've never seen the factors, so I can't say, but what you were saying, like, it seemed pretty amazing. Like, if you said there was, like, dyeing, right? Yeah. In their sh**. Millions of them will dye in the sheds, because they grow too fast to support their own body weight, they lie on their face, and they'll just dye. Yeah, I've never seen anything like this. Yes, common factory farming is common here in the UK. You'll see the green grass, pastures, all this advertising, but the UK is the same as any other country when it comes to factory farming. The main reason why I'm not vegan though is because I don't know enough about it. Oh, really? Yeah, yeah. Is that the main reason? Do you care about the experiences of, like, other animals? Yeah, I do, yeah. So you're not like Tristan? No, in that sense, no. He's like...  I think he's got a bit of a switch. Yeah. I think he's had to have that hard line switch for whatever reason. Well, he's like that with a lot of things, he's very regimented. Carefree. Yeah. Yeah, like, I think they were saying when he was in jail, he was like, I don't care, my mind is somewhere else, and like, so you can just really make the switch, because I don't think he wants to change.  How do you justify, like, yourself, because I've been vegan nearly 10 years, right? I was a big meat eater, gang member, things like that. Yeah, yeah. I just, myself, couldn't justify doing that to animals for what I got out of it. Yeah. You know what I mean? Like, I wasn't in some survival situation. I wasn't defending my family. They didn't commit some heinous crime against me. They were just innocent beings who were like, similar to dogs in their experience, infinitely murdered, tortured often en masse, so I could have this meal three times a day that I could easily replace. Like, I couldn't justify it. I'm asking, like, how do you justify it? Well, obviously, like, I go gym, so... I've just been told, like, I just need loads of protein. Ah, yeah? Yeah, so... How much protein? I have 300, 300 grams. Yeah, you're looking good. You're in better shape than me, but... I don't train. You've got pretty big arms, don't you? I'm going to train a bit more. I've got small arms, flat, for the first time. You look good. You look good. So, how much protein do you need today? 200? I have two. It's 250, about. 250? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Get that. I've got fast metabolism, so... He's a piss, mate. He's unimaginable. He's unimaginable. Don't worry about the amino acid profile. Like, it just all levels out. Like, once you get it... If you get enough protein after a certain threshold, you get all the right amino acids. The thing is, with my job, though, I'm always living out of hotels. I can't cook. I can't cook, so I'm always in hotels travelling around each day. Same here? Same here? Oh, really? Yeah, I'm a full-time activist. We travel around a lot. Yeah, yeah. We're travelling right now. We're in a hotel right now, actually. Yeah. And use a bit of Uber Eats. We use an app called Happy Cow. Okay. Or if you're training, I would just go to Tesco. Like, cold mock meats, cold vegan chicken. And I'll come back and I'll make a big... Chuck it in with salad, with beans. And I'll just, like, eat it in a container, like that. And then I can make sure that I'm getting enough protein. I'll bring vegan protein powder with me if I want to hit my protein. Otherwise, I don't know if it fits your macros or if you do, like, more strict regimen. I do, but I have to eat a lot because I've got fat metabolism. How many calories? 5,000. Five? Yeah, yeah. If I have 4,000 below, I'm losing weight. I'm losing weight.  No, it's a joke. What are you doing? I work in a rigger. Oh, for f***ing sake. Build stuff. But, like, that is... Yeah, it's a joke. 5,000 calories, bro. Eating's harder than the training. You're a rigger, but what do you do for training? Weights? Yeah, yeah, weight training. Just pure bodybuilding. Before we get into that, like, do you agree that it's kind of unjustifiable what we do to animals en masse so we can get this, like, trivial amount of... If it wasn't protein, like, let's take protein out of the picture. Just... There's a safer taste, convenience, habit, just like that. Yeah, yeah. You think it's unjustified? I'm not sure, because I'm not... Like I said, I haven't seen how brutal it actually is, but... What do you want to see? What do you want to watch? Yeah. I can show you a couple of things, like... To be honest, I really... I do believe you. I do believe you. I mean, we can show... You do believe me, but, like, it depends on what... What do you eat the most? Chicken? Yeah, it's steak. So if you watch this movie called Land of Hope and Glory, I know of these investigators who got this footage. So this is just, like, stock standard factory farming, pigs dying on slats. Maggots. Yeah, piglets dying on the floor. This is standard. See this s*** all the time. Antibiotics and s*** being injected into them, clipping their teeth out, tail off. Yeah, he was saying, like, this was a great human invention, right? Do you think factory farming is bad? No. Are they cruel, maybe? But I don't care. I think it's an amazing feat of human ingenuity. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Which, I mean, basically with Tristan, I was just, like, allowing him to say things that people, majority of people would disagree with. I mean, it wasn't as hard on Tristan as I usually am on people. I don't know if he was saying that just to wind you up. Exactly. So I was trying not to get wound up. Yeah, yeah. It's a gas chamber. So CO2 is an aversive gas. And when you inhale it, it burns your eyes, nose, mucous membranes, because it's like cannecote gas, you know that s***? Yeah, yeah, yeah. And they scream, they scream really loud. I don't agree with it. Massive yoga produced animals. I don't mind so much if you're going out hunting for your food. Okay. But that's not where you get your food, is it? No, obviously not. I'm against hunting too. I think it's murder.  Yeah. Yeah. So you're basically getting factory farm, chicken, pigs, cows, that are mass slaughtered anyway. Do you think that's justified? Because you said, I don't know what it looks like. We've shown you a little bit. Do you think that's justified for what you get out of it? If you had alternatives. Maybe I just don't care enough. I don't know. Okay. I don't know. You might not. You might not care about that because it's not you. But would you care more if it was dogs in those farms? Not really. No, not really. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So you're disconnected towards us, I suppose. You're on the fence about whether or not that's justified to eat them.  No, no, no. I don't think it's justified. I think we should make better attempts to make it more humane. Okay. That's what I think. But at the moment you support the inhumane stuff. I don't know if I support it. I mean, when I say support, I don't mean like go team.  You give them your money. I do.  You give them the money. You support it in that way. Yeah. Yeah. Where I'm from as well there's like a lot of fox hunting that goes on. And I've seen some brutal like, like there's been a fox before running down a train track and there's loads of dogs just charging down and this fox is trying to climb up this wall. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Just like and the dog's just ripping up. You're against that? Oh yeah. And why? Why are you against it? Because I don't think there's no need at all. That's just pure cruelty in my opinion. Me? No. But I would say it was not needless cruelty. I did it because I wanted to eat the fox. Do people even eat foxes? Just a hypothetical. Just trying to figure out because the reason I'm saying this just so you're clear. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's because I think all this is needless cruelty and suffering as well. I asked you why the dog hunting of the fox is wrong and you said because it's needless cruelty and then I just added the caveat of eating the fox. So maybe you thought, oh well now it's not needless or wait, is it still wrong? Oh yeah, it's still wrong. Like 10 dogs after one fox like what the hell is that? Being dropped into a dungeon filled with gases horrifying too. Yeah. But I didn't know this before you just told me. I didn't know they got dropped into gas. I had no idea. I thought they just go to a slaughterhouse, trapped in pens and then just get slipped. What do you think about that then? You think that's okay? I don't think it's okay but there's It's better. You can make we can torture animals more. Like for me example I'd much rather be shot in the back of the head without like we're having this conversation bang, shoot me in the back of the head and I know nothing about it. Then being consciously walk down a kill floor and having my throat slashed or going into a gas chamber and like struggling and drowning in gas, right? So yeah, there are better ways to be killed, right? Yeah. But because there are better ways to kill, does that make killing me okay? For a sandwich let's just say like for a burger like the same way. For, um, hit the macros, you know what I mean? Just hit the mac, the macros. I do agree with Chist in that sense though. I don't think humans are the same as animals. I like to say that they're on the same plane which is what Tristan was like oh, they're exactly equal. No. They share conscious experience. It might be different but it's still worth more than our taste buds. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I don't know. So like shooting a human in the head for a sandwich is wrong, right? Shooting a cow in the head for a sandwich is not wrong. From the cow's position is f***ing wrong. Yeah, from the cow's position, yeah.  From my position. Shooting you in the head is not wrong for me. It's wrong for you which is why it's wrong. I think it's supposed to be a superfood, so I've been told. Everyone's dreaming on to me in the bodybuilding world they reckon steak's proper superfood. Probably listening to f***ing all the carnivore quack clowns. I don't know who to believe these days to be honest. Yeah, look, all of the good nutritional data points to the more red meat consumption you engage in. So you start seeing like certain cancers or like heart disease risk.  It raises your blood cholesterol.  It's just f***ing like opinions. So what's your opinion on milk? Ethically, it's an abomination the way they obtain it.  Yeah, yeah, yeah. Full bestiality, right? She has an arm on pregnancy and they take her calves away. The males don't produce milk so they're not useful so they get slaughtered. Young, two weeks old, whatever. Get rid of them. They might go to veal, some might go to beef but they're slaughtered. The females, some little hutches they get grown to be used in the same way. So that keeps the milk flowing, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. And they do that for about four or five cycles until she can't get pregnant anymore. Yeah. She goes to get minced up into burgers, right? That's a dairy industry. Okay, yeah. And there's a lot of suffering and welfare issues. The maternal trauma being separated from calf to mother is one, lameness, mastitis, mutilations. They cut their horns off and s***. They can drop down then they'll just do it. I know, there's a lot of bodybuilders by me. There's a farm that's illegal, but like, they get raw milk. Okay. Yeah, so like, I've seen a few people advocating that. The dispenser is at the farms.  I don't think you need dairy milk. I mean, plant protein has better health outcomes than dairy protein. But dairy's an abomination even if they're, like, dairy's a healthier food than red meat. But it's just a f***ing abomination needless. Plant milk, why do you need milk anyway? Put it in your cereal. Easy calories, to be honest. That's the main reason. Easy calories. I'm a big drinker, so like, point of milk. So do you use smoothies or not? Not so much anymore, I used to. I just drink it point of milk. Ugh. Yuck. I mean, it tastes like f***ing spew now. Really? Yeah, and you gotta think that's for a baby cow. Like, it's a justified, like, dairy industry so we can drink connotations or anything. A little, but... What stops you from doing something bad? I don't feel good if I do bad things. So you're conscious? Yeah, yeah. Okay. I feel good when I do good things. Pretty simple, eh? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I feel like I want to be principled and I don't think they deserve it.  And it's a consumer demand thing. The more f***ing that's demanded, the more children get f***ing f***ing f***ed up from it. Yeah, yeah, 100%. So in the same way, like, this here, I see it as like, obviously it's different. The reasons are different. We're doing it for food and sustenance, whatever, taste, whatever. But it's just like, it's evil to buy this product in terms of like, amounts of suffering, killing, murder, as it is to buy or something like that. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. And all the only thing can stop you is your conscience, right? It is, yeah. Probably get your macros pretty easily as a vegan if you... if you... it might be a little bit of touch. Maybe, yeah, I'd have to do a bit of research, right? Because it seems to me like you're the type of person who spends a bit of time managing their diet anyway. I would give it a go. Like, I'm not a person that's like, no, I'll never try it. So I would give it a go there, but... But you agree that it's wrong to... these industries are bad? Yeah. Yeah, overall, yeah. Overall? I'd say they're pretty bad, yeah. Overall, I'd say. And best case scenario? Do you think that's bad? Yeah, I'd say so. I'd say so, yeah. I think of the best case scenario, there's a cow there, liking their life, chilling, new walk up and slasher head off. Yeah. Eat that body. Yeah. Maybe if I see it more in real life, like, I'd have a different opinion, but it's like, I'm a bit blind to it all. Yeah. Disconnected, man. You just go on the store and you buy it, and I see it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's what it is. The amount of calories you're eating, like, you're contributing a little extra than your average person, actually, to the supply chain. Yeah. You need a little extra meat. You need extra animals being killed. But there's kids on the farm. They've just been breaking chicken snacks from a little kid. Like, just think nothing of it. Yeah. Just like, like it's drinking water.  Yeah, yeah. And the next thing I know is, I used to know, just smashing stick a knife into you and walk off and think nothing of it. You know what I mean? Yeah, yeah. It doesn't change the ethics of the action, you know what I mean? Yeah. Like, I get it. A lot of people are disconnected. A lot of people are conditioned to violence. Some people don't care like Tristan doesn't. You care. If you feel bad when you do bad things and good when you do good things, maybe if you've seen a little bit, like, watch that land of hope and glory start to finish, and think, I can build my muscle without the bodies of animals who had suffered for it. Yeah. Or been murdered for it. And the whole body. And feel good about that. That I haven't caused the wake of destruction in its path. Yeah. I might give it a go, but I need to know more about being a vegan, to be honest. Meals and whatever. Check out Brian Turner. Brian Turner, yeah. Or Neema Delgado. Why are they good chefs? No, they're vegan bodybuilders. Oh, are they, yeah? Yeah. Or Hentcherba Bull. Interesting, yeah. It's doable, mate. Yeah. Like, you already look for s***. You're already making a little bit of an effort there. Yeah, yeah. And if I can do it, f***, anyone can do it, bro. I come from f***ing no education s***. And I can do it. Yeah, yeah. I can get my 160 grams. I can do 2,000 calories when I'm cutting, and then whatever, man. I can find protein sources everywhere. TVP's a good one. You can bring it in a bag dry. Yeah, you're too committed. Not too great, but proper committed.  We just get Uber Eats, or we go to Tesco, or we f***ing use an app called Happy Cow when we find vegan restaurants around. Yeah. Or vegan options like, vegan options everywhere, bro. On this street alone there's about 10. Burger King McDonald's have vegan options. You can get extra patties on the plant, Mcplant. I find it a bit strange that we're vegans. Well, they go vegan for health reasons and then eat like processed. Like the McPlant burger, for example. You're concerned about it? I don't know. But like when people say they do it for health reasons. You can't go to vegan for health reasons. You can only go vegan for ethics. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's what I'm thinking, yeah. Yeah, yeah. But you should look after your health, but all processed food is bad. Yeah, yeah. All vegan, you know? Yeah, yeah, yeah. A lot of people, they just generally want to be healthy and they want to have a burger. Yeah, yeah. At least options there. So they get the decapitated animal burger. You know? But yeah.  Yes, and you, mate. And you. Thanks for the chat. Appreciate it, mate. Yeah, appreciate it. It's up to you now. Only you and your conscience. Do as thou wilt, but you will be judged by the conscience god. By the vegan gods. Vegan gods. On you, brother. Hello. Are you a vegan? Yes. You're trying to? This is your sign now to be vegan. They don't want to discuss. They don't want to discuss. Are you a vegan? So no, is the correct answer?


Hello and welcome to another session on polynomials and today We are going to learn a very interesting method of multiplication of polynomials, so In the you know going forward you are going to use multiplication of polynomials a lot and hence We must have a very convenient method of multiplying So one of those method is called method of detached coefficients And it saves a lot of time in writing the you know variables multiple number of times while multiplying to polynomials So we will explain this process using an example so you can see there is a There is a product which has to be determined x square minus x plus 1 is to be multiplied by x square plus x plus 1 So first of all if the expressions or the polynomials are given you have to make it complete. What does that mean? You have to make sure that all the powers of the variable are there from the minimum to the maximum that degree of the polynomial so in this case if you see the first factor or the Multiplicant in this case The degree is 2 so hence powers of you know x should be 1 Sorry 0 1 and 2 so you can see it is completely Written like that so power of x is 0 then 1 then 2 similarly here also It is complete polynomial because all the powers of x are reflecting over there Now let's say if you had an expression like x cube plus 1 Okay, and one of the multiplicands would have been this Then you have to write it like x cube plus 0 times x squared Plus 0 times x and then finally 1 right. So this is the complete polynomial now once you have written the polynomial completely that means all the powers of the variables have been expressed Then you need to just detach the coefficients. So, you know all the coefficients which you can see So, let's take the first polynomial here x square minus x plus 1 this one the detached coefficients will be simply 1 Minus 1 and 1 so I'm writing it like that. Okay. Similarly in the second case it is 1 plus 1 and Plus 1 isn't it? So this is what it is Right now We have to just follow the normal process of multiplication, you know the way we do multiplication now first thing is Multiply this 1 by plus 1. So what is the result? You will get plus 1 Okay, then multiply this by this You will get minus 1 and then finally this by this. So what do you get you get plus 1 again? Now for the second line what you need to do is now you have to take this one and multiply with this one and Write just like you shift in your normal multiplication process. So you will write plus 1 here Then this one will get multiplied by this minus 1 here And the product is minus 1 just right in the left of it and then finally this one. So this will be plus 1 Okay, now you would have guessed it by now. So what you need to do next take? this one and multiply by right and write it here The next one, you know, so exactly underneath this one.  So this is one clearly This one is 0 This one is plus 1 again. This one is 0 and this one is plus 1 again and now you know how to Though what is the final result? So you have to just start putting the powers of or the x is here So x to power 0 x to power 1 x to power 2 x to power 3 and x to power 4 Right. So the product is simply x to the power 4 plus x square plus 1 you can check that this is the product Okay, let's take another example to make it more clear now, let's say We have been given to polynomials one is x to the power 5 plus x cube minus 2 x square Plus 3. Okay, this is polynomial number one and it has to be multiplied by this one x to the power 4 minus 3 x cube plus 4 x square minus 1 Okay, now if you can you see closely these two polynomials are not complete. There are few powers of x which are missing So let me, you know complete the expression. So it will be x to the power 5 plus x 0 times x to the power 4 plus x to the power 3 minus 2 times x squared plus 0 times x plus 3 Correct. And then this one is multiplied by 2 x to the power 4 minus 3 x cubed plus 4 x squared Plus 0 times x minus 1. Isn't it? Now, let's detach the coefficient. So detaching the coefficient you'll get Let me start from here 1 0 1 minus 2 0 3 Correct. 1 0 1 minus 2 0 3 and the next one will be simply 2 minus 3 4 0 minus 1 Okay, now, you know what to do simply multiply like that you can you know If you're very very Let's say you have practiced enough you don't need to write in this structure also you can do from Here itself if you if you see you know if you have practiced enough from here itself You know what to multiply when so if you now start multiplying so minus 1 goes to this So it becomes minus 3 then it becomes like that.  This is the first one and next one. Anyways, you know, this is 0 all zeros. How many zero six times zeros? You have to just keep shifting one by one like that. Next is 4. So 4 3s are 12 Okay, so right full no carry and all so 4 3s are 12 4 0 4 times 0 0 So I'm what I'm doing. I hope you're understanding now 4 3 4 0 4 minus 2 4 1 4 0 and then finally 4 1 I will do so I'm writing the results now. So 12 0 minus 8 and 4 and 0 and 4 next one will be minus 9 then 0 minus plus 6 minus 3 0 and minus 3 Okay, and then finally with 2 it is 6 0 minus 4 Then 2 0 and 2 and then simply add Add all of them. You'll get minus 3 0 14 Then minus 10 then minus 2 then 9 Then minus 7 then 6 minus 3 and 2 Okay, so hence now you have to just put the Variable as in variable. So this is x to the power 0 x to power 1 x to power 2 x to power 3 x to power 4 x to power 5 6 7 8 9 Okay, so the answer is 2 x to the power 9 minus 3 x to the power 8 plus 6 x to the power 7 minus 7 x to power 6 plus 9 x 5 minus 2 x 4 minus 10 x cubed Plus 14 x squared 0 x n minus 3 This is the product. Okay, so you might be thinking that it is taking a little bit of more time while writing all of that but you don't need to Write in this format. You can do it verbally as well. Okay, so that will help in You know multiplying two polynomials faster. So this is called multiplication by detached Coefficient, I hope you understood this process try some more taking some example polynomials yourself and then try and then It will become easier to multiply bigger polynomials very very easily