Welcom y toffi TV, we are joined by Callum Snell here. We're going to talk, Ped, about Uman Y Ys, everyone's favourite subject. This is the daily accent by the way, Fer. It is the daily accent, yes. I should have probably introduced that, but there you go. But you know it's the daily accent cos you've clicked on it. Oe, sorry. Obviously. Uman Y Ys, being in the news, it's... Listen, he's been out the Premier League matchday squad for the last couple of games. He hasn't been in the 18. More and more stories are appearing now that he's going to go to Galatasaray, looks like, in January. Apparently he was close to moving in the summer, didn't quite happen. So are we right to consider letting him go in January? Yes. He's played 48 minutes of Premier League football so far. So I think personally, if this... I think you'd always get it done, like your squad players. Have I ever good your squad players are? That's your drop-off, isn't it? You're only as good as your squad players. And you look at him, and you look at Dominic Alvent Lewin as a kid. You look at him as a 27-year-old. 28? That wasn't... 28-year-old international. And you just think... You're not good enough. Even though last season you had these little moments and come back out of wilderness. For me, I just think... For me, I think it's about pecanodas. And I think as we try and improve, everyone will go down one. So maybe we've got a boss centre forward. Tokshun will go down one. And then that means the one at the bottom, who I think is Neas at the moment, needs to be shifted. Carl, what do you think? I agree.  I think there was a lot of nostalgia attached to it a little bit. It was all like, oh my, oh my. He's come back. He's come out. He's got to lock it. It was all of it. Because I think a lot of it was the situation that we found ourselves in last season. We were sort of scraping the barrel for any sort of positivity we could. You know what I'm saying? And I feel like Neas was one of them. Especially we came on, scored against Bournemouth didn't we? We got a couple against Bournemouth and then the Sunderling game as well. And people were like, oh yeah, there's a lot of light. But now that I think a bit of progression has been made, I think people now don't think, now Silver and Brands or whatever, getting their feet under the desk a little bit. And you're like, okay now, do we have time for putting up with this a little bit? And what I've seen so far when he's in the season, no. That's the point isn't it? Last season he was effective. He scored against Crystal Palace as well. And obviously he got the suspension and won the penalty. And that maybe took the wind out of his sails a little bit. But he was an effective player.  And I'm not having a go with that by the way. I do think that ability wise he's limited. But if it wise he still gives everything. But I think this season, I don't know whether it just seems like he knows his time's up. I don't think that means that he's stopped trying. I just look at him and think the enthusiasm's gone out. Last year he had a point to prove that he got in. Cymru had treated him poorly. Let's be honest. Treated him awfully if we're being honest about it. When he got back in the fold and he worked hard. It was always about proving a point. And he sort of reached that glass ceiling now to a certain extent. Now it's like, what else can you offer us now? And he's like, I don't know. And it's a shame for the lad. But he comes to a point where decisions have to be made. Especially if you want to go forward anyway. I think the fact that everybody's level's gone up. I think in that squad everyone's gone up. Last year we were desperate for anyone to just put the ball in the net. Let's be honest, we were. When we got the end source and he didn't hit the ground running. So he has to put the ball in the net. I think that's why a lot of people had a bit of a sentimental attachment to him. And I think that's why there are questions around him. Like, does he stay, does he go? But you've got to make decisions. And some of these ties have got to be cut, mate. I think he was an underdog, wasn't he? And people like an underdog, especially ever. When things are going wrong. And it was also two things up to Cumin as well. When times were bad, especially that. The fans got on board with that. Especially with the Bournemouth game. When people were like, we're not winning games. And then this fella comes off the bench and proves a point.


Have a good flight. See ya! Those storms are very slowly moving away from wall 1, that's good at least. He's coming up. Nice. 40. Contact. Receiver's stable. Tanker's coming left. Contact. Receiver's stable. Nice. 4301, we got enough gas to continue our night, thanks for the help. Awesome, sounds good, no problem. 8.3. You received 8.3? 8.3 from Alliance 01, copy. Y'all have a good night. See ya! See ya!


All right, committee, I believe we are live on YouTube. Good afternoon, everybody. This is the Senate Institutions Committee from the Vermont State Legislature. We are on September 8th, Tuesday of 2020 in our continuing COVID-19 coverage. And we are here today to talk about H880. Bill, I guess I'll let the sponsor describe it, but essentially we had a agenda that was looking at this as a two-day affair originally, but after looking at the actual language of the bill, it's only three paragraphs. If you discount the intent language, seven sentences if you eliminate the effective date language. And I suspect quite strongly, as much as the sponsor and Carol McGranahan who's also here and Commissioner Schneider who's also here wanna talk about it, we could probably vote on this today if everybody is in agreement. It doesn't seem to be very controversial, but I could be mistaken. I suppose we'll find out the answer to that question momentarily. It is for introductions. I am Joe Benning, the chair of the committee from Caledonia County. We have Senator Mazza from Grand Isle, Senator Lyons from Chittenden, Senator Hooker from Rutland, Senator Rogers who is from Essex Orleans will not be joining us today, but he did want me to let the committee know that he is in favor of this bill and fully supports it. With that, the first person on my agenda is Representative Brian Cina. So Brian, if you are with us, I don't see you on video if you were planning to be there. And yep, there you go. Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Thanks for having me here today to present on H-880. And I was gonna share, yeah, I'm a co-host now. So bear with me as I pull up a little short presentation that I gave in the house that I'll run through with you quickly. It should be about two or three minutes. And bear with me because we are all adjusting to this new era of using this technology. So hopefully you see the right thing. Can you see a slideshow appearing before you? I do. All right, so here we go. So we have here, we're gonna talk about H-880 and act relating to Abonacci place names on state park signs. And this picture you see here is an example. This is a rock off the coast of Burlington. It's colonial name is Rock Dunder. It's original or aboriginal name is Odeozo. And there's a story about this rock being the creator of the Champlain Valley. So this is an example of a place that has a colonial name and an Abonacci name. And these days people are using the Abonacci name more to call this place. So that's what this picture is. So H-880 and can you see the next slide as I scroll? Okay, the head nods, okay. So H-880 it's an act relating to Abonacci place names on state park signs. And so sort of here's the rationale for the bill. By adding Abonacci place names alongside colonial place names on the state park signs the state intends to recognize that the state of Vermont exists on territory that was originally and is currently inhabited by Abonacci people. It increases visibility and awareness of the Abonacci people and culture. It helps to preserve and promote the Abonacci language. And it honors the history, significance and spirit of places. So some examples of Abonacci place names. So I just gave you one, Odiozo rocked under it means he who created himself. And you can see here there's a list of place names from around the state of Vermont. I didn't look at where each of you come from but I looking at your faces I know you're from different regions and some of these place names come from your areas. So you can see here, you know we have in from North from Senator Mazza you're in Franklin County, Grand Isle. Grand Isle. Grand Isle front, yeah. So Grand Isle, the Grand Isle County you can see Miss Iskway is near your area that's place of Flint. You can see here, Senator Benning where are you from? I'm from Caledonia County but you've got the Connecticut River there. Right, so you've got Connecticut Qua. You also you're in the area where Brunswick Springs are but there's not a name for that right now. I just had my first tour of Brunswick Springs about three weeks ago. Oh, great. Yeah, so no one has yet told me a name that people have found for Brunswick Springs but that's an example of a site that we might someday find that there's a name for but we have Connecticut here. So Long River and Senator Hooker you're down near, are you near? I'm looking at these mountains. It's our creek. Okay, so. Otter Creek. I don't know if you want to try saying the Abinaki name for that. It's a hard one. So I'm not going to try because I wouldn't want to do that. Witsibow. What's that? Is it when we sysbow? I don't know.  Yeah, it's a nice try. And I would have our time with that one but I think the point here is that this is a list that was generated that Rich Holshew published. I have the source down at the bottom of the screen there. People can check it out. This is just a preliminary name. The idea of the bill, and I don't know if we're going to have Ledge Council run through those three paragraphs would be that the Commission on Native American Affairs would work with the state to sort of manage a list of names. So this is a starting point, but over time, as more place names emerge and are identified, the state could slowly add those names to state park signs. And the idea is that we would do this as we replace the signs. So the fiscal impact wouldn't be large. It would just be as a sign gets replaced, we would have another name to add to the sign queued up. And slowly over time, we would see Abenaki language appearing around the state in different regions, reminding people of the history of our state and also reminding people that Abenaki people are still here. So I don't want to take up too much time because the chair of the commission is here and I think that the chair of the commission can speak more about what this means for Abenaki people. I just wanted to present the basic idea of the bill. And I do have some other possible witnesses here that we heard from some of which we heard from in the house. I think many of these witnesses have signed on to a letter that the chair of the commission can speak about. So at this point, I'll just be quiet and make space for the chair. And I can answer, and then I just have here questions and Abenaki, that's Nadad Mahwaganal. So if anyone has Nadad Mahwaganal, I'm happy to answer them. Uliuni, Mia Nadobak, thank you, my friends. Hope the committee is paying attention. There'll be a test on this at the end of the day. Carol, I'm sorry, Ginny. Senator Lyons, you're on mute right now. Okay, thank you. No, I just wanted to ask representative, Tina Way didn't ask me to pronounce Winooski. I didn't mean to leave you out. You know what it was? No, no, no, no, it was a joke. It was a joke. Yeah, I'm gonna, you know what?  Can you do, I see here Camel's hump, which, and Mount Mansfield, which are both touching your Senate district. Why don't you try one of those? I'm not looking at the word, but it was something about most Musa Gagani or something like that. Here, I'm sorry about that. Oh, it's to say. That's okay, no. It's okay, it's, the Camel's hump is Taui Podiwajo or Mozio Zagan and Mount Mansfield is Mozdebiwajo. So I just didn't see you in the little sidebar when I was looking at that. You didn't show up in the- I was lucky. No, I was lucky. You were spared. All right, so thank you. All right, I have Commissioner Schneider. You're up next on the agenda, but as I think about it, Carolyn Granahan, who is the chair of the Vermont Commission on Native American Affairs, I'd like to pull you right in now as a segue to Representative Chena and especially so you can answer the question, how bad did he assassinate the names he was pronouncing? Oh dear, yes. Thank you so much for letting me join you today. It actually does much better at the Apanaki language than I. And I think that that has really been, for me, the most significant part about this bill is that our language was pretty much decimated. It was written through the eugenics that it wasn't safe for people to admit that they were Apanaki. And of course, a big part of that being that culture is that you speak the language. And for generations, the eugenics had actually affected whether the language survived or not. There are a couple of people who teach the language now. I think that's where Brian, Representative Chena, has been learning it. I have an old brain and I don't, it doesn't wrap around those words so well, but the way that it affected my family, for instance, is that my great-grandchild's family was named in the eugenics survey. And what that meant was that we were not taught about our culture, we were not taught our language. We couldn't celebrate, we couldn't perform our spiritual practices. So for me, this bill is significant in the way that it's recognizing that we really do exist, that we have a separate culture and a separate language. So it's very significant in that way. It also, I think, gives us a little bit more visibility when we used to be able to go to the state house, the first visible and really tangible evidence that we were here was the new display with the Apanaki recognition items. So it gives people who are visiting the state also an idea that there were indigenous people here, that it wasn't just a vacation land that everybody passed through while they were hunting and fishing. And they were still here. So this is a face of a real person and I am Apanaki. So for me, recognizing and honoring the places that had names before the settlers came is also part of our noting that places are sacred, land is sacred. So all of that rolled in. That's why we worked with Brian on getting the bill together. Of course, if you would like to be more aggressive, I would like you to name and add signage in addition to the ones that you're replacing. But that's me. So thank you very much. Committee questions? Carol, there's another Carol who is an Apanaki who lives in Albany and I'm forgetting her last name. Carol Irons, yes. Well, she happens to live across the street from my sister-in-law. Oh, okay. And we had Thanksgiving together last year. Oh, nice. And she was mentioning that she was very frustrated that the Apanaki had been promised a display and the state was dragging its heels. So I just want you to know that as a result of my position, I undragged those heels a little bit and got in touch with our state house curator and made sure you guys got something in there before we got out of the session. It's a great display. I appreciate this bill. And so just you and Brian know, I travel quite a bit throughout the North American continent and you are not blazing new ground here. Kotatsu have similar place names, the Cherokee down in Tennessee. I have been noticing those signs because I'm a historian at heart and I really think it adds great flavor to wherever the location happens to be. So I appreciate you guys working on this bill and getting it to us. Any other questions or comments before we move on? Cheryl. I just want to say thank you to Carol and to Representative Gina for bringing this to the committee, to the process. I've learned a lot just in this really small amount, a short amount of time. I've learned a lot that I didn't know and I ashamed to say it, but I hope that we can get this through the process and get it voted on and through the Senate before we leave in a week or two. Commissioner Schneider, I believe you're up next on the agenda. Greetings. Thanks, Mr. Chair. Good afternoon, everyone. For the record, Michael Schneider, Commissioner of Forest Parks and Recreation. And I'm happy to join here, having done so previously in the House and I can mostly restate what I said there's pretty short. I and we enthusiastically support the purposes. The idea here is certainly the purposes and want to make it happen. And I would simply add to that, I think a couple of points that are my responsibility to make, I suppose, that want to make sure that we have an accurate understanding of the expectations, what it is we're trying to do here. I think I hear it. I'm not sure the bill language actually says it. And I don't mean to interfere with your accelerated pace here, Mr. Chair. I think we can handle that, but I just want to be clear about what it's saying so that we get it right. And because I think it's very important to do this well, respectfully and meaningfully. And I don't want to miss it. So with a couple of questions about accuracy, clarity, if you will, accuracy and costs to be flagged, I'll circle back and say, we enthusiastically support this, want to get this done. And if now's the appropriate time, I would just call your attention to a couple of those questions. Does that make sense, Mr. Chair? Sure, yeah. Great. So we can get to costs. I'd flag that as like, we have to have resources to do this. We are signs, signage, names are really important to everyone, whether you're Abinaki or not. It's true in state parks. And we take great care in our kind of brand, our look and feel. And so we see a great opportunity to have these sync up, but we want to know what it is that we're promising to do so we can do it well in a way that meets the purposes and also complements our existing approach to signage, et cetera, and our brand. And I don't know what that's going to, I need the clarity before we can get a sense of how big an ask is this? There was a bit of a fiscal note drawn, there was a fiscal note drawn in the house, but a lot of assumptions about it. And I want to zero in on that because it's not terrible, but we do need to flag that money's an issue. It was an issue in February pre-COVID, it's certainly an issue now after, during the pandemic. Anyway, the question I really have about, so I just flag, I'm sorry to be garbled here, I'm just trying to flag that, we have a concern about the cost because I need to know what it is we're going to do, how much little costs we can make a plan for it responsibly to get it done. What I'm asking is we are to confirm that we are not, this legislation does not contemplate renaming parks. It's about signing with Abinac-y place names when we know what those are. And so I want to be clear, everyone's nodding, sponsor representative genus nodding, that's good. And then it becomes, we have a lot of signs. We have entrance signs that are very important. We have signs when the process of evolving those entrance signs to have sort of world recognized icons for certain activities within a park that would go on that entrance sign. So we're in the process of kind of reimagining that, that could be a great opportunity to sort of note, hey, note, Abinac-y place names within this park, something like that, but then we get into the park and I'm wondering, are we talking about, so in the case of, you have on the list, you heard Mount Mansfield, we have Mount Mansfield State Park, or under Hill State Park at Mount Mansfield, Mount Mansfield State Forest is not a park. I'll use Camelsump, it's on the list here. Camelsump State Park, we're not proposing to, that the mountain is the name. And so I guess what I'm trying to get at is, are we naming features within a park or just parks that are named for a feature like a Scutney or Camelsump that they themselves have an Abinac-y name? I'm sorry to be so inarticulate here. What I wanna know, and I'm wondering if I could just ask through the chair to get, maybe the sponsor could clarify, it's all Abinac-y place names within a park that you'd love us to identify, is that correct? As opposed to just a park whose current English name has an Abinac-y name as well. Like we have a Scutney State Park, Mount of Scutney has an Abinac-y name. But within a Scutney State Park, there may be additional land features that could have Abinac-y names. And I'd be interested if the intent is also to sign those, which we'd be happy to do. But if we get into more than just those basic place names for the park itself, that's a bigger number and a larger task to plan. Forgive me, thanks for your patience. Is the question clear? Yeah, do I have permission to answer it? Absolutely. So, because I don't believe, I don't have the bill up in front of me, but I don't believe there's like a big intent section or anything that explains this. Right. For the record, I can tell you what my intent is and maybe Chair McGranahan could chime in too, that for 400 years, there's been a process in place on this land of erasing the place names and replacing them with other names. And we see this bill as turning the tide and starting to acknowledge the original place names, the aboriginal place names over the next 400 years. Like this isn't like in the next year, every state park needs to change its name or add to the sign a name or every land. It's a process, it initiates a relationship between your section of government and the Native American Affairs Commission, a relationship that over time will generate ideas that you could incorporate into the signs. And so I think it's pretty open. Like as time goes by, if my vision when I'm very elderly and retired and traveling around the state of Vermont in a hundred years, that I could go through different state parks and see the Abanaki place names all over the place. But that's a long-term vision. I think the short-term vision is to start getting some Abanaki on some signs. And if the easy thing for you to do is add it to a few entrance signs first, we would appreciate that. And then I think over time, it would trickle into other areas of state parks and hopefully other areas of our society, as people see this happening, that other towns, municipalities, organizations would start looking to add Abanaki names to signage and to our vocabulary as a state. So Michael, I do have the bill in front of me and I'm a lawyer, so I suppose I can do a little ledge council reading here. Very first substantive sentence in the document says the commissioner before installing new signs or replacing existing signs in a state park, shall consult with the Vermont Commission on Native American Affairs to determine if there is an Abanaki name for any site within the park. If the commission advises the commissioner of an Abanaki name, the Abanaki name shall be displayed with the English name. I'm gonna pause there, that's the first paragraph. That seems pretty clear to me. Unless and until you are about to replace a sign or put up a new sign, you don't have to do anything at all. Once a sign is going to be put in, I envision you would be making a phone call unless you've been provided with an advanced list of names for that particular locality. And I guess I would question whether or not a fiscal note is necessary to have you making such a phone call or looking at a list that you've been provided with. I didn't see this as having any money attached to it whatsoever, other than perhaps the extra paint you have to put on the sign itself. But one of the things that would kill this bill for this term in a heartbeat is if we say there's money attached to it in some fashion. And if there is, that's a whole nother problem. And I guess I would need to know right off the bat whether you believe there is some kind of money attached to this attempt. Okay, thanks Mr. Chair. I'm not an attorney, but for what it's worth, I read it the same way, so that's good. And I wanted to hear you all say it. I think that's very important. And in fact, in part maybe some of my questions come from remembering in the spring and then maybe there was a bigger conversation and there at one point, this was in a different form at least to some extent possibly. And there were these questions about how many, when the signs that is. And that's why they asked for the fiscal note because I said, well, we need to know how much. I just to be clear, I am not suggesting right now that there needs to be any fiscal barrier to your moving this legislation right now. Okay, I just wanna be on the record saying I've asked the question, I wanted clarity about what we're being asked to do because down the hall is it where I get asked, well, why are you doing this? You don't have any money for that, so it's fair. Oh yeah, I noticed that there's a lot of language that was in the original bill that has been crossed off. Right. So there may have been a fiscal note at that time that was requested. But let me read the second paragraph. The commissioner shall adopt rules establishing a procedure for selecting the spelling of the name if there are multiple spellings provided by the commission on Native American Affairs. Do you envision any kind of a need for a fiscal note on that particular question? No, my question about funding was about the, we have a lot of signs and excitement about replacing them or adding to them with Abinaki names once we have a list and know where to put them. I think there's a lot of features out there. It was all about that, being able to make the signs with respect, not just splashing some paint around but making some classy signs that get this done the right way. We wanted to be able to be prepared for that. So I have no further concerns and certainly the rulemaking is not a cost concern for me. It goes to my last question, which was about sort of accuracy and it came up in the House committee in a conversation that there were, I guess, separate bands who were acknowledging they have different spellings for the same places, two different Abinaki spellings. And my concern there is that I would love to do this. As we keep saying, I don't want to, we're not qualified to make that decision. So this was a surprise to me in the House where it became, well, you go to rulemaking to figure out how to deal with confusion over names. I'd like some help with that is all I'm saying. I don't think the commissioner of FPR should be settled with that. Because again, this is all about this being important, meaningful and getting it right. So that's my last question was, what's the expectation there? Because clearly I can't be the arbiter through rulemaking of the correct spellings. No, Carol, I see you have your hand up but I'm gonna start before I go back to you by saying it is vested with the commission of Native American affairs to give you the exact spelling that they want. So if an individual band, say the Missuskoi was at odds with the Nalhegan and how to spell something, it's the commissioner of Native American affairs who was going to have, I'm sorry, the commissioner of Native American affairs who was gonna have the ultimate call on how that spelling will be.  Yes, thank you. I was going to say that the commission is actually the umbrella overall for. So we have representatives in a perfect world. We have representatives from all four of the tribes on our commission. And I have, I'm a member of one of the tribes but I also have good relationships with the other three. So I see that as our role in communicating with all four and making sure that they agree that the spelling that we sponsor is actually okay with everyone. So that's part of our process is that we communicate with all four chiefs and the tribes and come to consensus on what the spelling would be. So that's up to us. And I expected that was our responsibility. Mr. Chair, the bill, the language though, again, maybe I need your legal counsel here, but as I read it, the language is saying that the commission shall present the list and they will state if there are multiple names or spelling variations for a place. It doesn't say that they will decide which one. It says they will give me a list and my reading of this says that list may have multiple names on it. My responsibility is to go to rulemaking to sort that out. And I'm nervous about that. I'm gonna be honest. Again, I don't mean to be the skunk at this party. I'm asking these questions because I want this to happen soon and well. Well, the way that I'm reading it, Michael, the commission on Native American Affairs is going to have to provide you a list and it would be strongly encouraged to provide you a list with individual names not multiple names. Otherwise, I agree with you that you're gonna have to figure out a rule to decide between which. And the only thing I can suggest is if a given location is within the boundary of a particular tribe and somebody else in another tribe is suggesting a different spelling, I think you've got your rule right there that you abide by the local tribe.  Yeah, I just, I had some thoughts on this because I did speak with some of the chiefs about this after it passed the house, so that people were questioning it. And one recommendation that was made was that perhaps the commission would work with one of the Abonacke language protectors or keepers or linguists to work this out or that when you're making rules, you may consider at, you know, I don't know what, I don't know when you're rulemaking process what authority you have to set a rule around asking the commission to do that or you doing that. But the point is that there are language experts that could be consulted. And so if this is gonna be a barrier, perhaps the solution is for the commission to try to send one name. And if there's two names to maybe give you some information about how they, you know, where just suggestions about how to resolve that, you know? But the main thing was that there are language keepers and linguists that could be consulted to help iron these details out because there are different spellings and different histories that people have kept. So, right. So I'm gonna read the last paragraph. Honor before March 15th of 2021, the Vermont Commission on Native American Affairs shall prepare a list of places and landmarks with Abonacke names. The list shall state if there are multiple names or spelling variations for a place. The commission shall present the list to the commissioner of forest parks and recreation in order to facilitate the construction of signs as required. The commission shall also determine if there are sites outside of state parks with Abonacke names that require new signs. I'm not sure, Brian, where you were going with that last sentence because this deals with state parks. Can you give me an example of someplace outside that the commissioner would actually have jurisdiction over? I think the idea was that if there's road signs leading to state parks, that they would provide that information. I don't think there's anything in here that makes anyone else do anything. But the idea was like, if you were gonna have on the entrance sign of Camel's Hump State Park, the name of Camel's Hump, that sharing that information with the people who put up road signs that they may over time decide to add that to the road sign that says Camel's Hump, but there's no requirement. It really was about trying to disseminate the knowledge outside and to start raising awareness outside of the state parks of the place names. So I think that was where we were going with that one, acknowledging that changing road signs was such a big thing to get into. So instead of mandating that, it was more about sharing information with people to see if it may over time lead to the addition of Abenaki place names to signs that are not located within the boundaries of a state park. Because I think that was out of, that's really, once you get beyond the entrance, who has jurisdiction about signs that say Camel's Hump, leading to Camel's Hump State Park. And this is something we talked about, not wanting to necessarily mandate change, but give people knowledge if they choose to add that to signs. So it is vesting the commission on Native American affairs with the responsibility of coming up with new signs. But as far as the commissioner of forests and parks, there's nothing in this language that ties him or her to having to respond to that list. That's safe to say? Yes, exactly. Yeah, it's about the commission. I mean, as I'm reading the language, it's about, it's actually the commission who basically after they have this list of, that they give forest parks and recreation that the commission would share, would have that information to share with others. It doesn't really say anyone else has to do anything. It just says the commission will determine if there are other sites that require signage. Well, when you come up with that list, I will wish you success in approaching the respective transportation committees to talk about the next. I got a question. Yes, sir. Yeah, I wanna, before we pass this, I wanna make sure that commissioner Schneider can pronounce every name that we discussed a few moments ago. I'm working on it, Senator. I'm working on it for sure. I have a lot of faith in you. So I wanna make sure that you're on board with us. I got what you said. I think I'm doing pretty well there. Quebec? Yes? I'll keep working. I don't mean to make light of it. It's, there's some, that's part of the issue I think is to understand that there's a lot of different ways to know these places and they've been known for a long time. So again, appreciate it. So, Mr. Chair, if I could though, I guess I want to, Claire, I just wanna make sure, again, given that as written now, as it's before you, it's asking for a list and acknowledging that there may be multiple names, but remaining sort of unclear about that. It's saying that the commission delivers a list and all they need to do is let me know that there's multiple names on some of them. That's, it seems- It would be your job then to take that list and decide which name you're gonna put on the sign. Right, and I'm flagging for you that I think that's inappropriate, respect for that. I agree with you. But within- It should be a name that you want, they want. Right, and I wanna get it right. So within, but I could go to rulemaking and say, I want this commission, I want the linguists, do I get to do that in rulemaking is just reach out and grab- It should be done now. It should be done in the upfront, I would think, right, to direct it. I don't mean to slow it down. I really don't, I feel bad, seeming like I'm putting up a roadblock. I'm not, I just wanna get it right. And I think this is an important detail about the accuracy here. And so I appreciate your consideration of that. No, I appreciate your concern, Michael. I'm trying to, if you are the person invested with the authority of adopting rules, unless and until a list is produced that has multiple names, the question is moot. It is relevant only if you get a list that has multiple names. Believe we have one already. So we have an early copy of a list. I wanna, by the way, I wanna tell you, near as I can tell, there are 15 state parks affected with the partial list we have so far, which is, that's a fun fact. I believe there are some on here that have been identified already. It's having multiple spellings. So if you're developing rules, I've suggested that a good way to resolve the conflict is to adopt the rule of the local tribe that covers that geographical area. Makes sense to me. But you're the one vested with the rules.  Representative China has his hand up. Yeah, I'll go to Cheryl. And I mean, just speaking of the, it sounds like, if the commission could iron out details it would eliminate a problem, but if it couldn't be, this is sort of a question for forest parks and recreation is, could a rule be that if the commission doesn't provide us with one spelling, we will choose the spelling based on which band, it's the preference of the band whose territory falls in and that would basically say to the commission, you better figure this out or else we're gonna choose for you and choose it by the band. And then that would give them, see I see Carol's thumbs up. I don't know if that's allowed to be, if you are allowed to do that as a rule, but I think that would be a way to solve this issue without us having to change the bill.  There's really no other way to approach it. You have to be the final caller. Any other issues you've got, Michael? No. No. Okay, Senator Hooker and then Senator Lyons. Well, I just, I guess I question how this would slow the process down if we were simply to amend the bill to say that the commission, the list that the commission provided, the commissioner would be with the preferred spelling. The answer to your question immediately is it would then have to go back to the house for consideration and we are running out of time. Hope that answers your question. Well, it does, and I've just, you know, it ain't gonna happen. Okay, so we'll just go with your suggestion with the rule. My question is for Carol, and what are the chances that the commission would be coming up with a list that would be very difficult to sort out in terms of spelling or naming? It seems to me that we already have the beginning of a list where there are two alternatives. Would the commission be able to pick one of those alternatives for the commissioner of Forest Parks and Recreation? I'm just wanting to know whether or not you think there's controversy embedded in this. No, I don't believe there would be controversy and I think Senator Benning is correct in that that there does happen to be two spellings or two different names, even that the territory that whichever territory is involved that the chief there would be the ones make really the final decision. But that, I see the commission's role, the Native American Affairs role as being kind of the go between. We do have linguists and two of the people in know he can do teach the language and they're very much knowledgeable about the history of these places. And I'm hoping that all four of the tribes will be receptive of whatever the linguists prefer. But again, I don't see that as the role of the parks. I see that as the role of the commission to hammer all of the details out before the list is given to Parks and Recreation. Is that answered for you, Michael? Well, I don't know that it does. I think what Carol is saying is kind of making my point that they should do it. This is leaving it to me. It's hoping they'll give me the list and I would certainly expect or request that, depend upon it, defer to it. This bill doesn't say that, right? I understand your timeframe. Listen, I'm being put in a place where it appears I am opposing something that I'm very excited about supporting. And I understand the timeframe. I just have to do my job and I feel like it's responsible to point out that this is a little bit out of sequence, it seems. And I believe that Ms. McGennahan is saying the same thing that they're the ones to do it. This doesn't sync with what's here. But you have the authority to make rules that set a process, put a process in place and require the commission to come to you with a list or recommended list. The rules are, you have a lot of authority during the rulemaking process with this language. And if something really significant happens between now and January, I think that there's room for improvement going forward. But I can't imagine this would, I think this is a really good place to begin. You have a March 15th, 21 date that the commission of Native American Affairs is supposed to come up with a list. So whatever list you have right now, while it may be causing a little heartburn, it's not the list you have to use. They need to come up with a list. A signal is clearly being sent that the commission has to get its act together in order to not provide you with any more conflict that you need to deal with.  And I've only suggested that the local tribe be deferred to as one of your thought process in trying to move it forward. Senator Mazza. I understand what the commissioner's saying and I will support this if we clear up his concerns. I think it's a very important issue. It's not something that we have to do immediately. I'd rather get it clear now. And I support it, but I also wanna make sure that the burden is not placed on him to have to make choices. I'd rather have it clearly spelled out. It comes to him with that name. He does his job, he carries it forward. There's no questions asked. That's my spin. So the logistics are somewhat problematic and I don't know how to deal with that. We are suggesting, or at least I'm hearing a suggestion that there needs to be language changed here. If language is changed here, that means the bill has to go back to the house for consideration and we're running out of time. Mr. Chair, if I may, could I please? I really appreciate Senator Mazza stating his understanding of my concern and appreciate that very much. And I really want to help find a way through here. And I think his well-stated support now was standing. I'm willing to stand down on this. I mean, it's not really my decision. I get to share my thoughts, you decide. But I would encourage you to move ahead. I guess this is the last piece. It's not really about me. And that's kind of the point is I don't know what is to come. And I think that the way you have it here, you could have a commissioner who hasn't been part of this conversation, who thinks very differently about it and who sets rules that Senator Lyne said, you have all the authority here. You get to decide. I don't think that's good policy to set it up so flimsy is something that's this important. And I say that respectfully. I just mean it could be, I could decide to do something terribly different with that. If I have that much authority, I understand it says shall here and there, but I established a procedure for selecting the spelling of place names. Which could be, you know what? If they're in conflict, we're not doing it, right? Isn't that a possible outcome? And I don't think we want that. Ryan, can I ask what committee this came through in the House? It came through the General Housing and Military Affairs Committee since that committee generally engages with Native American issues. Who the chair of that committee is? Tom Stevens. Okay. Anybody else wanna bring anything else up? I guess I need to just flag if I could, Mr. Chair, I'm sure you've already caught it, but the effective date probably wants to get advanced as well. Yeah, I saw that. Okay, committee. I don't think we're gonna vote on this today. I wanna talk with Tom Stevens and I wanna see if there isn't a way to clear this. Michael, if we had some kind of language in there that made it clear that the commission shall resolve any disputes about place names prior to sending the list. Yeah, that's the idea, Senator. I appreciate it. And again, I'm ready to sort of stand down in support of this, but I feel better having flagged it and you guys get to decide how important that flagging is here and how much time you have. And if you gave it a day to sort that out and see what it could look like in a conference, say, maybe it's worth it. But I just wanna, I'm on the record saying I support this and I wanna be clear about that and do not wish to hold it up. But I feel it's important to, we all understand the clarity about how it works. Good. Thank you. Thank you. Anybody else wanna weigh in today? Okay, guys, thank you all for coming. We're gonna be meeting again tomorrow at two o'clock. I'll see if we can't get some answers prior to that happening. Thank you. Thank you. This will conclude the Senate institutions meeting for September 8th.


What's up everybody? Jason here for jazbyskagewrakes.com. This sells out Panini one-on-one basketball picketing number one with this random number block for the Nets, Cavs, Rockets, Pacers, Bucks, Thunder, Sons, Blazers, and Wizards. So again, you get a piece of all of these nine teams for a fraction of the price you would have paid for all of them. And again, works just like anywhere the random number block, but only for these teams in this specific break. You get a random number from zero through nine, and of course we go by the first number on the left side of the serial number dash. There's your examples there. Remember, any and all redemptions go to spot zero, any one-on-ones go to spot one, and any non-numbered cards, which will probably be any downtowns, will be randomized to the group. So if you have a spot, you have a one-in-ten shot to potentially get those right there. So Let's do the break now, guys. So here you go. Here's the dice roll. Let's roll it. Got ourselves a six and a two. Eight times. Good luck. One. Two. Three. Four. Five. Six. Seven. Eight. Put them down to mark. Eight. Eight. One. Two. Three. Four. Five. Six. Seven. Eight. Zero down to four. All right, so Adam. With zero, any non-redemptions. Patrick with five. Mark, you have any one-on-ones. Brian with nine. Gretchen with six. Paul with seven. Mark with two. Gretchen with three. Joe with eight. And Mark with four. So again, guys, let's alphabetize this. Let's print out the sheet. And again, guys, coming up next is the break itself. So good luck, everybody. Break itself. Coming up next. All righty, guys. Do they have on that prospering coaching staff to understand what the playoffs are all about?


God Will send me all good That's the rep they've been full sent They've been sent into the car mate. Do you hardcore? All you need to wait hold on I need to focus against this.  You come Say if you're getting I got it going going going I got okay fear oak rug trinket Just just 1v1 and one woman just keep them off me. That's it. We win. I'm having a word I'm having a word dude No, there's the click Inhance rogue get stuck in mate. I reckon Save me zippy. Oh, this is rough. We just play it like Palawari and hope for the best. We got Palo trinket nice traps nice Yeah, they play wrong Good stuff. All right shadow rogue, but I didn't get the fear Wow, he hits the kick. Not good. Fuck. I've won no shield now. He's dancing 10. We have to win like now Preg decay It's painful to watch man.  Let's full sentence decade. I'm gonna go for an early fear.  That's super good. What are they doing man?  I'll drink it There's Kang away from the palad too much when he has trap There's a very risky drink depending on how they react to it.    I swear to God what


Chloroquine is the recent treatment for the Toyota Corolla. It used to be used for malaria. I haven't seen one person, let alone doctor, justify the mechanisms of this drug, and I do find it awfully suspicious that all of these YouTube influencers are supporting the drug. It's pretty obvious when you look at the case studies, it's very dangerous, the words poisonous and toxic can justifiably be used. Fearing being hit by a Toyota Corolla, Arizona man dies after taking chloroquine. A Phoenix area man is dead and his wife under critical care after the two took chloroquine phosphate in an apparent attempt to self-medicate for the Toyota Corolla. Children who have ingested only twice the recommended dose have died. It is remarkable that until a few years ago, chloroquine was available over the counter in Britain. Acute chloroquine poisoning is life-threatening, involving high risk of death caused by cardiac arrest, arrhythmia and apnea within a few hours of ingestion. Hmm, those symptoms seem awfully similar to Wi-Fi radiation poisoning. Chloroquine poisoning with respiratory distress and fatal outcome. Chloroquine poisoning can cause life-threatening cardiovascular disturbances. We report three cases of suicide with chloroquine causing acute respiratory insufficiency from pulmonary edema with lethal outcome despite attempted treatment.  And don't the symptoms of this supposedly helpful drug sound awfully similar to the ones that people are dying from? Are they being admitted to hospitals with a slight cough, then suddenly after being treated with chloroquine they are having their lungs half full of liquid and put on ventilators? Is this just a guise for the pharmaceutical for the hospitals for the big pharma industry? To make more money? Every study you look at points to symptoms that line up with this V-I-R-U-S. Side effects are generally mild and transitory, although visual disturbance, muscle weakness, and acute psychotic behavior have been encountered. A review of the literature and data from the American Association of Poison Control Centers reveals instances where exposure to as little as one to two tablets of chloroquine resulted in serious consequences. How in the world is anyone speaking positive about this? Did they not look at both sides of the story? Taking this drug is more dangerous than getting the Toyota Corolla itself. But what makes this drug so dangerous? It alters the pH of your cells, which prevents the activity of certain enzymes that break down cell materials like fat and protein. It also inhibits tol-like receptor TLR signaling and nucleic acid sensor cyclic GMP-AMP, basically suppressing your immune function. The anti-inflammatory effects of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine could be explained in part by the upstream interference of immune activation. In malaria the drug works by inhibiting the heme polymerase enzyme, which is present in the acidic food vacuoles of parasites. This enzyme is only present in infected cells. So normally these parasites are using hemoglobin as iron is essential to the function of most living cells, whether they're good or bad. The digestion of hemoglobin releases ferroporpherin 9, also known as hematin hydrochloride, which is toxic, as iron is a pro-oxidant and excess iron in the body is one of the most damaging things possible to cell structures. The malaria parasite normally detoxifies this free iron, but chloroquine inhibits the removal of the iron. So my understanding of this drug is that it is killing bad cells by disrupting iron metabolism, but also causing massive oxidation in those areas due to increased accumulation of iron. So according to my non-doctorate understanding, this drug is destroying the bad stuff, but also causing damage to the good stuff. The idea is that more damage happens to the bad stuff and that your body will therefore be able to fight off what will be smaller amounts of pathogenic tissue. That is, if your heart doesn't explode due to your lungs collapsing. So anyone suggesting that this drug can be used?  So I can't really speak on that front. It is kind of sketchy and creepy how all these people on YouTube are talking about this and almost recommending it as a treatment. I think a safe alternative is what I spoke about in the video I did the other day. Six steps to master your immune system. Follow those things and you will be perfectly fine. So thank you guys for joining me. Hopefully, this helps some of you guys out. If you guys want to support me further, you can check out Frankie's Free Range Meat. We got some stuff back in stock. You can go to Oregon Supplements if you don't have access to beef organs at this time of need. Check out Frankie's Naturals for Minimal Ingredients Minimally Processed Hygiene and Cosmetic Products. And you can also go to frank-follow.com for a free carnivore diet meal plan. Thanks again for joining me, guys. If you haven't, please drop a like on the video.


Hey guys, it's Nate, A.K. The Foot Accountant. Welcome back to the channel. We are talking about headliners. Yes, headliners is coming. We don't have a loading screen, but we have some more information on some leaks, some player statistics. And yes, we are gonna take a look at some player leaks today on those statistics because my take on the leaks is on this game, we are just kind of conforming to what this game has become this year, right? I don't like it. I don't really enjoy the leaks. I missed the element of surprise, but what we do here on this channel is we look at the market, we explain, we analyze and we predict what is gonna be happening on this market inside of this game with content and these leaks impact a lot of that. So if I'm just ignoring the leaks and not telling you why Mbappe's inform, if you had no idea, has gone from 2.2 million coins down to 1.9 million coins, then you're gonna be very confused. So that's why I don't skimp over the details and we talk about everything on this channel. I know some of you guys don't like to be spoiled with the leaks, I totally get that. But in order for me to bring you the best market analysis possible, we gotta talk about it. So we are gonna look at some leaks today, nothing insane, just some player stats, nothing new from outside of yesterday, except just maybe a little bit more of an idea of why this headliners promo might actually disappoint. I mean, we talked about that in yesterday's video some as well and I don't wanna belabor the point at all even more. But I really feel like we might be in a foot versus scenario here again and I'll talk about that and what that means for the market. Also, regarding the market today, regarding prime icons and the rewards market with these winter wildcard items as well. I think prime icons are gonna drop today.  I also think that wildcards might drop a little bit today. I don't expect some really big drops. I know a lot of people are wanting to invest in these cards and I also just kinda wanna share my thoughts on these winter wildcard items and where they could go, especially if the promo this weekend is not very good. So we're gonna talk about all of that today also Thursday content that we are expecting to see on this game. So if you're enjoying the videos on the channel and if you're excited for the headliners promo, give this video a thumbs up and of course, subscribe if you are new but let's get into these leaks, right? Because these are leaks, these are supposed stats. Now some of the stuff could change, right? It's definitely not set in stone. This is not 100% true yet, right? We don't have a loading screen yet. I think that's gonna be coming out today. The cards are not obviously released yet. So of course, we just take this with a grain of salt but this is why we're talking about this, right? I do think this headliners promo could disappoint but it all depends on how they plan to upgrade these cards. But for some of the boosts that I'm seeing on these cards initially, they don't look that insane apart from just a couple items. Again, Mbappe here with a plus one, you wouldn't expect Mbappe to have an insane boost, right? But these are the official cards that's for him. 99 pace, of course. That's an upgrade obviously over his inform which does have the 98 pace. So this Mbappe is gonna break into a new threshold of 99 pace. He's gonna break over 80 physical and over 90 shooting. So this Mbappe is gonna be expensive. It's gonna be very, very expensive. And if Zlatan Ibrahimovic on this market is 3.3 million coins, then a live 93 rated Mbappe, I have no doubt that this Mbappe is gonna be four million coins on the game tomorrow. I really don't doubt that unless EA make the pack weight super duper high and supply this card a lot on the market which I don't expect to happen. I think he's gonna be very, very expensive and very, very overpriced. That's just my opinion because it's a live card, it's orange, it looks sick. And he has 99 pace and is the best striker in the game. So those are Mbappe stats, but let's keep going down the list here, right? Couple other cards, Rhys James. This looks like a pretty decent card, right? 90 pace, 83 defense, 86 physical. That one looks pretty good. Very nice pace upgrade there, very nice upgrade on that card from EA Sports. Rhys James is one of the very few cards so far that have been shown that looks like it got a really good boost, right? Rhys James looks pretty solid. That's a card that will rival Trent Alexander Arnold's rule breaker card as a right back in the Prem. Serge Nabri is another one of those cards that looks really good, right? This is a solid upgrade for this card, 90 pace. You got a really nice pace boost. Besides the pace though, the rest of this card just got a decent upgrade, like a lot of plus twos and some plus threes. But having that 90 pace is really solid for Nabri who has been lacking pace both in the past two years in FIFA. So that's a nice card for him. Akunya, this is the one that is gonna get everybody excited. This is gonna be the most hyped card in this promo team. I'm telling you, right now, this Akunya card is always a FIFA fan favorite. 86 pace, 90 dribbling, got a huge pace boost.  I know it's a live item, but how often do left backs get informed? Not super often. But still, if Sevilla can put some wins together if we assume that's how they're gonna upgrade these cards per usual, this Akunya might look really, really insane. And then there's one other card that I believe was talked about and that is Virgil van Dijk. And this is, again, if the Reese James, the Serge Nabri, and the Marcus Akunya are the best cards. If those are the best cards that got the biggest upgrades and the rest of the team is just lackluster or not good, like this VVD upgrade, then I think the promo is gonna be even more disappointing than what we expect, right? I think the upgrades for this promo team are going to be average, except for the ones that we've seen that look really good, like the Akunya, because I think he's gonna be the most popular card. But that is, again, why I'm kind of getting this idea that this promo might be kind of an L. And I think people are gonna be expecting nice things. You know, maybe there's gonna be some panic selling heading into tomorrow on Friday on this market with other people maybe selling some of their cards to try out some of these headliners that are leaked that look pretty cool and stuff like that. But I just think this promo's gonna be a bit of a disappointment, I really do. And that's why I was mentioning the versus promo or a little bit earlier is this versus promo, you guys remember how excited we were for this promo when it came out because of the insane cards that we were exposed to get, but then the actual cards that we received on the game were such a big L that the market just exploded back after that because the cards that we got were not very hyped. Now we're in a point in the market right now with these Winter Wild Card items which this market has a lot of coins, right? It's a lot to have 3.3 million coins. It's just a great example of this market having a lot of coins. People are willing to pay the big bucks for a card like that. With all the lightning rounds we have had in the past two weeks of the Winter Wild Cards promo with all of the people getting on the game for the first time, maybe opening saved up, not saved up packs, but FIVA points that they have gotten like that. This market right now is just in a place where there is a lot of coins. I know there's been a decent amount of SBCs, but there's also been a lot of lightning rounds and a lot of packs which have supplied the market with coins that enables people to go and buy cards off the market. I mean, what other reason would explain besides just the rarity of this Luca Modric card? Luca Modric has gone up to 800,000 coins from where he was last week at this time, 600K from this Winter Wild Cards team one, right? These cards are so good, they've just pushed. Again, we talked about it earlier this week as well. They have pushed the power curve up in this game to a new level. Everybody wants these cards. And I just think they're gonna outshine the headliner. So that's why I'm a little bit scared about the headliner's promo. Now our last chance today is that EA Sports put a loading screen out. As I do expect to see one today, they would have some more information on how these cards might upgrade more than once. Because again, if it's just like a win streak like last year and previous years for headliners for that streak upgrade that you see, the second card design four, that's gonna be disappointing and that's gonna fuel the buyback on the rest of the market. If cards are low at all tomorrow on Friday or even today on Thursday, as people prepare for this promo, if there's any changes to how they do the upgrades, if they would give a double boost or something like that, that could make headliners a bit more exciting. But at least right now it seems like it might be disappointing. So that's kinda how we're starting to prepare unless we hear differently from EA Sports. Now let's talk about the market right now because literally everything on this game is up in price. It is up and it's really stagnant, right? A lot of stuff isn't moving that much because I don't think there's a lot of hype for people like there's no panic, right? People aren't scared about the headliners promo.  Most people are just worried about, hey, when do I buy these Winter Wild cards for my team? Because these guys are the ones I wanna use and they're going out of packs, which creates a very interesting scenario because today at Rewards is one of the timeframes where you would think to look for these cards as they are going out of packs and a lot of people still want to buy them for their teams, you know? I just, I think there's a lot of people that are gonna be investing in these because Winter Wild cards team one rose so well out of packs last week. I just don't know if it's the same scenario for Winter Wild cards two this week. I'm a little bit afraid of over-investing on the Winter Wild cards team number two. Now I do think that some of them could rise up, of course, you know, maybe a guard like Lucas Mora or Anthony Martial or Gen Duzzi, right? Gen Duzzi is one of the most exciting and hyped up cards right now in this game with everybody running with OR and some League One, like Causa, those types of players and those types of links.  Tiarani is the best prem left back at 47,000 coins. I think that is very, very cheap. Magnon is a French goalkeeper, special cards. We all know that those rise very well. So I'm on the fence with these cards, man. I really am. Whether it is today, if they drop low today or get low tomorrow morning on Friday, if headliners is bad, yes, they could rise up a bit. I just, I don't know if it's going to be as extreme as the cards that were in team one of this Winter Wild cards promo because I think there's so many more people that saw the rise on team one and they want to get involved. There's going to be a lot of over-investing with these cards. So all I would say is be careful. All it takes, again, and this is a risk that we run all the time on this game, but all it takes is EA Sports to drop one insane pack, drop lightning rounds, which they didn't do yesterday on a Wednesday, which again is just like aiding in these cards, staying higher in price and it puts more FOMO for a lot of people, right? They're like, oh my goodness, if I don't buy these cards before they go out of packs, then they're going to go up in price and I'm going to miss out. I think that's what EA's trying to create with not doing lighting rounds yesterday on a Wednesday, which we kind of expected. And for the first week in the last time in a month, basically, since they have not run lighting rounds on a Wednesday, that was very interesting. So I might buy a couple of these, but I'm going to be very careful unless I, it's going to have to see, I'm going to have to see some sort of drop on these today for me to at least think about getting involved at all. And the ones that I would say would move up the most in price would probably be your most rare ones. I know that we have like a couple primary league strikers like Aubameyang and Odson-Edward that are supposedly leaked as SBCs for coming soon. But this Marshall card I think is a really good looking item. I think a lot of people want to try out this card and use him. I think that Alice Angelini, I mean, a lot of the cards that are in this team look primed for a bit of a rise out of packs. It just comes down to is there going to be over-investing? Are they going to rise up a little bit and then stop rising in value? Because we do have team of the year like in three weeks. So, you know, these cards could rise up. I just don't know how insane it's going to be. So I'm going to be careful with these cards. But I do think today on Thursday, a lot of people are going to be looking to buy these because of course it's the last day that they're in packs. People are going to, they're going to have the fear of missing out. They really are. Cause they saw what happened to team one and you're going to see some people investing in these today. I almost guarantee you that. Now for the rest of the market with rewards, you know, I usually try to trade with some gold cards but like Virgil van Dijk is a guy that I try to flip on Thursday with rewards and he is out of packs. Now he's up to like what, 46,000 coins or 45,000 coins. He was 39K earlier. Hakimi is another one that I try to flip but he's in team of the week this week. The market is just, it's very high. It's very stagnant, right? Again, we talked about the prime icons. I do think some of the primes are going to drop off in price today. Hugo Sanchez right now, I know it's late night so these cards are rare anyway. This guy is 1.3 mil. He was literally a million coins flat yesterday. He was a 990K, a million coins flat. He's up to 1.3 just off of rarity. I think that all the prime icons, especially the ones that are in batch two, batch two, the cards that have only been in packs for a few days, I think all these cards are going to drop off today as they get supplied a little bit from division rivals rewards. It happened the first week. I know it's like Nate, who's packing icons today? Well, it happened the first week with batch one so I think it's going to happen again this week with batch number two so be very careful with those. That could create a good flipping and trading opportunity with those cards though. And then again, the rest of the market, you might see some cards rise up and down a little bit today. One of the cards that I like to trade a lot in this game is Phil Ford and Rule Breakers just because he is a very popular card and he moves around a lot. How much is he right now? Is he like 250K? 250,000 coins, 243. So that's up for a card like this. That is definitely up in price. So maybe some of these cards rise up a little bit today as people get coins with rewards. But it's a tough market to trade in and to find a lot of deals because everything just seems so high at the moment and there's no real need to sell for a lot of people. They're just holding onto cards and there's a little bit of buying but it's very tight margins and when you have a lot of people that are bored and don't know what to do, they try to make coins and invest and sometimes that means over-investing like I mean with the Winter Wild Cards from team number two. So we're kind of being very careful with that. Now, things that we could see today on Thursday for this game, of course rewards, right? That's gonna bring some supply to the market of these cards. Also, marquee matchups. We're gonna get another marquee matchup set of SBCs today. We are also due for two, the final two Winter Wild Card swap tokens should be made available today in this game. Now, I don't know if they're gonna put another one of marquee matchups if they're gonna do an SBC but I think that's gonna be a part of the content today on this game. I would also, you know, an icon upgrade SBC. I don't know. I know everybody wants it. I'm not expecting that. I mean, I think it's possible. I'm definitely not expecting it. A player SBC for one of those leaked items that like either the showdown between Kovacic or Kieta potentially. Edward, record breaker potentially. Again, those are some of the leaks but we're just gonna have to wait to see until those come out when they were released but that's kind of what we could see for content today. I'm not expecting a big day. Yesterday and Wednesday was just really, really, really quiet. I mean, there was literally no content except for the brand new Silver Stars which I actually did end up going and doing because I opened my 85 times 10 and this is just a little account update for the lads. This is how the team is looking. It hasn't really changed much since I got the OR card in the team and I did the ice pool of sick if you haven't seen my team in a while but yeah, this is the squad boys and I did the 85 times 10 and basically all that I got from it was Toremi. I didn't pack anything sick. I got Toremi. I did get eight walkouts so I got a bunch of 88s. Like I got the Chiquiquelo Navas. I got Suarez. I got Holland. I think Virati might have been in the pack and I got up some 86s. So, you know, Hummels is in there and that's this Toremi of course is in there too but it just, I was hoping for something big but we went for it, right? We risked it for the biscuit so you can't pack anything sick if you don't take the chance. So, we took the chance with the 85 times 10 and it just didn't do that great. So, that's kind of an update on just how it feels right now on the market. Now, actually one other thing to mention. This is another leaked kind of item but if you saw Eddie Milletow's price move yesterday on this game, this is actually one of the craziest leaks you're ever gonna see. This is not from a legit source but it caused this card to move. Madrid Zone on Twitter tweeted out a screenshot of Milletow's girlfriend tweeting out or on her Instagram story saying that Milletow had won the Player of the Month. My homie won Best Player of the Month in La Liga. So, this is tweeted out by Madrid Zone and of course people is like, oh my goodness, the voting for La Liga Player of the Month is over and so they went out and they sold their Milletow. Now, if Milletow did actually win La Liga Player of the Month, which I don't think, this is like, if you've ever taken a leak with a grain of salt, this is the one to take with a grain of salt. I think a Milletow Player of the Month, it would be 86 rated and it probably would look exactly like this 86 rated numbers up Milletow but it would have less dribbling because obviously this card has a very high boosted dribbling stat. Now, the Player of the Month Milletow should be 86 rated because it should get a double upgrade off of the 82 but I'm just really wondering, are they gonna make it any better in the pace, defense and physicality department because he's probably not even gonna have 80 dribbling on that Player of the Month but a Player of the Month SPC should be cheaper than 500,000 coins in my opinion. So, that could still drop Eddie Milletow's price a lot more but this would technically be the better item unless they really juice up the stats on that POTM but even still having the better dribbling, some people might prefer this card. So, there could be some more panic selling on this Milletow but I think LaLiga Player of the Month would be released. I don't even know if it would be released like today, either Thursday or Friday is when they release those POTMs for LaLiga but we still have like a week. I think there's still seven days left on the SPC for Vinny Jr. eight days and you know, sometimes these SPCs overlap. We've seen it before just the way the calendar matches up. Sometimes when they release the voting for the previous month, like Vinny Jr. will probably still be live when they release the Milletow Player of the Month since the voting is over but it just seems crazy that it's eight days. So, maybe it's on Friday, maybe they're not gonna announce this award until next week but I would presume Friday, I guess it just seems a little bit crazy if you're still grinding on POTM Vinny Jr. in the game but whoever does end up winning that SPC should be the first of the few Player of the Months that we see. It was crazy that that voting was just announced so early. They might even announce that player if they'd announced it this week before the end of the month. So, that's just kind of interesting to think about as well. So, it's gonna be a very interesting day on this game.  It's gonna take something really, really big on this game to make the market move a lot. That's what I'm thinking and that's what I'm feeling because this market is just in a place where it's very stagnant. A lot of cards are not moving in value as people have nothing to really panic for, right? The promo, we don't have a loading screen. Maybe if we see a loading screen there'll be a little bit more panic on some of these cards but just at the moment, stuff is very stagnant, right? And it's not very easy to make coins when there is a lot of stagnant things on the market unless you are looking at very rare cards. So, I don't think there's gonna be a ton of movement after rewards today. A couple of cards going up here and there. I don't expect anything to boom because nobody really sold cards and yes, people will be buying after rewards today but I don't think there's gonna be as many since there really wasn't any panic selling. So, I'm gonna be careful with my rewards flips today. Mostly liquid at the moment apart for just some fodder cards that we're still continually relisting hoping to get some lazy sales on this game but we'll be taking a look at the icon market, I think, a little bit today since those cards are pretty rare we'll be trading with some of those out of packed special cards and maybe the current team of the week. If you're wanting to look for something at rewards today check out like Hakimi, Benzema or maybe Kessie's Inform during rewards. Like right now this Hakimi Inform is 180,000 coins. He's gonna get supplied at rewards. He might dip down to like 130. That's probably a little bit low. How about like 140, 150, right? Then he could potentially rise back up a little bit. Keep an eye on these ones to watchers that just got freshly upgraded as well. Hakimi's back to 380,000 coins. After being 340, he's rebounded back up. So maybe some people are motivated to go out and try these cards today as they have got fresh upgrades on some of those live cards. So we're just kind of waiting for that loading screen. I do think it's not quite a guarantee but it's very, very likely we will see a loading screen today. I'm surprised they did not drop one yesterday because they've been dropping them on a Wednesdays for the past few promos. So that's the video for today boys. If you did enjoy, smash a thumbs up on it. Comment down below if you have any questions and subscribe if you're new. It's been Nate The Foot Account and I'll catch you guys later. Peace out.


Let's solve a question on surface energy and one on surface tension for the first one We have a spherical raindrop of radius r which breaks into 27 smaller droplets of the same size So all of these droplets 27 of them. They're of the same size How much work is done on the large raindrop by the external environment and s is the surface tension of water? Okay, as always pause the video and first attempt this question on your own Okay, hopefully you have given this a shot now. Let's see what the question is asking us It is asking us how much work is done on the large raindrop on this raindrop by the external environment Okay, let's make sense of that So the external environment might be applying all of this force on this on this large raindrop And because of that this drop might have it might have Changed into smaller droplets the ones that you see 27 of them when the droplet was large Like this there was some surface energy associated with it, right? And similarly when the droplets are small even then there will be some surface energy associated with it But if we if we think about the work that is being done on the large raindrop by the external environment That can lead to change in some surface energy In fact, we can use the work energy principle and say that work done is equal to change in energy Now in this case we can assume that there is no friction as such So whatever the work that is being done on the large raindrop that is not leading to any increase in thermal energy or there is no friction So all the work that is being done on the large raindrop is purely Leading to change in the surface energy of the raindrops. So there is some surface energy associated initially There is some surface energy associated finally This is EF and this is EI and the change in the surface energy can be written as EF minus EI Now we can think back to what was this surface energy Well, we defined surface tension There was one way of defining surface tension as force per unit length right F by L But this there's one more way of defining surface tension, which is energy surface energy per unit area E by A so E E over here is nothing but S into A S into A And we can write it in this manner because we see that in options There is there is this variable of S. So it's okay if we include S in our equation. Now, let's think about the area Let's see how the area is changing Well, one thing when this raindrop was broken into 27 smaller raindrops We can be sure that one thing that is not really changing is the volume, right? There is no amount of water being lost anywhere. This big raindrop is just changed to smaller raindrops So the initial volume and we can write that as 4 by 3 By r cube. This is equal to the final volume and final volume is 27 multiplied by the volume of one small raindrop so small r cube Let's work this out So this just gets cancelled off and we get when we remove the cubes we get r equal to 3 Small r. So this is how the radius of the large raindrop is related with the radius of a smaller raindrop Okay, so now if we if we if we plug in if we plug in this this value of energy surface energy over here the final the final surface energy really is Surface tension into the final area Final surface area minus surface tension into the initial initial surface area And we are taking S because even a surface tension is not really changing, right? It's water to begin with water that ends with and surface tension is just a property of a liquid It's just like density so it won't it changes from liquid to liquid But it's constant because we are only dealing with water a spherical raindrop. So water in this case So S remains the same final and initial now over here we can take S common and Final area we have 27 raindrops. So 27 Into 4 pi r square that is the surface area of a sphere 4 pi r square So 4 pi and let's write r by 3 in place of small r We can take 3 to the left hand side. This becomes r by 3 So in place of small r we write r square Divided by 9 and we are subtracting 4 pi 4 pi. There's no space left big r square That is the initial area. This is 4, okay So 9 this goes by 3 and 3 into 4 is 12. So this becomes let's write it. Let's write it Over here work is equal to 3 into 4 12. So s 12 pi r square minus 4 pi r square and this is when you work this out This is 8 pi r square s that is option C. All right, let's look at one more question and this one will be on surface tension All right, here we have a u-shaped frame which has a 12 centimeter long sliding wire on the open side So we can see that on a diagram. This is supposed to be 12. So let me change that It's dipped in a soap solution and placed horizontally and Unstressed spring with a spring constant of 0.4. So let's write that this is 0.40 Newton meters has one end tied to a wall and the other end is attached to the sliding wire It's observed that that wire slide to the left this long sliding wire is going to the left Stretching the spring by 2 centimeters before coming to a stop. What is the surface tension of this soap solution? All right now when we look at the situation when we see that the sliding wire is being it's sliding to the left We can ask ourselves why? Well, this is a soap solution and it will have it will have a surface tension Now what was surface tension to begin with we can say that surface tension is a property of any liquid That wants to minimize wants to minimize its surface area So surface tension is the property of any liquid that wants to minimize its surface area and this wire that is sliding to the left Then makes sense because now the surface area There was this initial surface area and now this final surface area slightly less, right? It's not as much as it was initially the wire has moved to the left And the only reason that the wire will move to the left is that there must be some force, right? There must be some force that is acting on the wire. So let's try to draw the free body diagram for a wire over here Now there must be some force that is acting to the left, but we know that there is a spring attached to the right So there is a force which is acting to the right as well This force is the force due to the spring now in the question in the question It says that the wire moves 2 centimeters Before coming to a stop so when it has moved 2 centimeters it has stopped and the only reason that an object that is in motion If it stops from the Newton's second law, we can say that the forces on it are balanced, right? The forces on it must be balanced So when it has moved 2 centimeters then this force due to due to the soap solution This should be equal to the force due to the spring says from from Newton's laws We already know what the force due to a spring is it's k into x and x over here is 2 centimeters That is the extension of the spring and also the distance moved by this wire But what is the force that the soap solution is exerting on this wire? Well to figure that out we can go back to what surface tension was Surface tension mathematically we defined it as the force per unit length force force per unit length and in this case this force right here We can say we can say this is s into l right if we assume that s is the surface tension of this soap solution and L is the length of this fire so in place of f we can write we can write s into l and we can equate it But the story isn't complete right now Turns out for a soap solution we take two interfaces. There is a surface on the top There's a surface at the back if you try to see how it looks like we can have a look at this image right here There's a there's a top surface maybe the ones that we see and there is a surface behind at the bottom and between you have all the water in Bulk you have you have the water So when it comes to soap solutions, we consider two surfaces So there's a force acting on the wire at the top surface at surface one And there's a force acting on the wire at the bottom surface and at the interface two at the surface two So turns out therefore we multiply this with two. We added two over here Because the force acts at surface one and one more force acts at surface two So this is 2 sl and now when you work this out, we need to figure out we need to figure out the surface tension So let's keep s on one side when we do that. This becomes equal to kx kx divided by divided by 2l Now I think we do know everything. We know what length is 12 centimeters. We know x. This is 2 centimeters We also know k that is 0.4 Newton meters So pause the video work out work out the calculation on your own and then and then hit play All right, this will come out to be equal to this will come out to be equal to 0.03 Newton per meters that is the surface tension of this soap solution Okay, you can try more questions from this exercise in the lesson and if you're watching on YouTube Do check out the exercise link which is added in the description


Our question of the day is, is dropshipping legal? Let's find out. Dropshipping is an easy way to make money. But is it all too good to be true? Is reselling a product you don't own legal? The answer is yes. Dropshipping is a completely legal business model. At the end of the day, all it is is a fulfillment method. When a dropshipper gets an order from a customer, they just have their supplier ship the product directly to that customer. It's the middleman method. And plenty of retail stores use this method, mainly because it's faster, cheaper, and overall the least risky fulfillment method in comparison to investing in inventory. Overall, dropshipping is legal, but the key is to avoid any illegal pitfalls that you might bump into along the way. So let's go over those pitfalls. Number one, not paying taxes. Dropshipping is just like any other business. So just because you're an online store doesn't mean you don't have to pay taxes. That means your sales tax and your income tax. Most selling platforms will pay your sales tax automatically, but it's always good to double check. And as for income taxes, that's usually up to you to file yourself at the end of each year. Number two, sharing customer information. Privacy rules exist for dropshippers too. Most countries require that you keep all customer details private, especially payment info. To make things easier for yourself, it's actually standard practice to write a privacy policy and have it available for your customers to read. Number three, selling copyrighted products. This is a super common mistake I see a lot of dropshippers make. As a rule, just avoid selling any products you know are copyrighted. That means big brands like Nike or Apple. But you can also check the eBay Vero page, which has a full list of products you can't sell without special permission. Link will be in the description below. If you sell a copyrighted product, you can have your listing removed, account suspended, or even face legal action. So if you're asking me, it's just not worth it. Number four is selling counterfeit products. Selling knockoffs of popular brands is illegal, even if you didn't know it was. So do your due diligence, make sure whatever you're selling isn't a knockoff in that you're using reliable suppliers. If you need any good suggestions, check out our video on the top dropshipping suppliers. Link will be in the description below. Number five is selling age restricted and forbidden products. This can have even harsher consequences than a copyright violation. Most countries have strict laws when it comes to selling age restricted products to minors. Just as an example, in the U.S., selling alcohol to a minor is considered a misdemeanor that could lead to a fine or even potential jail time. Even when it comes to selling to adults, it can get complicated too. For example, in most cases, you usually need a special license to sell tobacco, weapons, or certain medical supplies. And I don't know about you, but jail doesn't sound like such a great time to me, so it's probably best to avoid these categories altogether. Number six, price gouging. Usually during a natural disaster or global pandemic, we see major supply shortages. For instance, at the beginning of COVID, we saw a shortage in hand sanitizer and for some odd reason, toilet paper. So when supply is down, that's usually a great opportunity to up your prices and earn a bit more than usual. But if you overdo it, this can actually be considered price gouging. It all depends on the level of the price increase and your local laws. Still, you'll definitely want to avoid price gouging since it's considered illegal. But in most cases, when it is legal, I'm a big advocate of raising prices when you can because it's a good strategy to increase profits and sales. So there you have it. I hope this video answers your question. Dropshipping is in fact completely legal and many platforms even promote it, like Wix, Amazon and Facebook. If you found this video helpful, make sure to hit that like button and if you have any other questions about dropshipping, drop them down in the comments and we'll be happy to answer them. Thanks so much for watching and I'll see you next time.


First of all, I wanted to thank you very much for all you do. Thank you the Bitcoin space I like Pamela a lawyer and you were like Pamela and yourself were important factors in Me getting extremely excited about About the space. Thank you and do for even a traditional Coming from a very traditional profession where we like to stay put And I would like to I hope that many more lawyers get on get on board on this So I'm gonna do my best to get them enthusiastic And I find myself Studying this space and constantly being excited about what is possible is we have to reinvent our whole industry New business models and every day I come across something. I think wow I why didn't I think about this and I was wondering if If you still get excited about Things that you come across. What was the last time that you really got excited? So I never saw that coming. Oh That's probably a weekly experience for me I just just keeping up to date with what's happening in Bitcoin innovation is something that's a full-time job And I barely managed to do it myself I'm very excited about some of the new technologies obviously Payment channels and Lightning Network we were talking about today. I don't think people realize how deep this technology is and how Transformational it can be yet, but there's so many other things that people have never heard of that. I find fascinating One of the interesting things about the recent scaling conference in Milan was that it was a showcase of a lot of different approaches towards both Privacy and scaling And some of those ideas were just mind-blowing. I'm reading the papers and trying to understand them most recently I Heard and better understood Covenants Covenant technology, which is the ability to put recursive constraints on forward-looking transactions It was presented by emin Goncero at Bitcoin scaling just a basic presentation You have to read the white paper to understand it better. This is still Fascinating Technology you can say this UTXO is locked in time But also the transaction that spends it has to spend this much to this output and has to have a multi-sig or has to have A time lock and then the transaction that spends that also has to have a time lock so you can chain things into the future That's fascinating Mimble Wimble who's heard of Mimble Wimble? Okay, who understood Mimble Wimble Okay, nobody tried to lie. I have no like I can't even Mimble Wimble is an application of elliptic curve mathematics to a chain that allows you to do radical pruning Extreme scalability and extreme privacy all in one chain It was dropped onto an IRC channel as an encrypted Tor link by someone who used the French name for Voldemort from the Harry Potter books who we have no idea who it is So when I say that Bitcoin is an incubator for black swans That's what I mean like you think everything's going along normally and some completely anonymous person drops a piece of Just mind-blowing science and the entire community goes what what? We're still trying to understand it Some of the smartest cryptographers spent weeks trying to understand it and then to explain it at scaling tumble bits zero cash segregated witness itself all of these technologies are fascinating to me and Again, one of the things that I've appreciated about Bitcoin is we have this high-level Debate that everybody's getting all focused on about the block size, etc And what that's missing is that underneath in the development community the innovation has been Accelerating for the last two years and the stuff that's coming out It's gonna take two or three years to be in your wallet, but it will blow your mind Yeah, still excited every single day still learning every single day Thank you


And the governor, forever stating it, says he was worried when he learned of former president Olucia Gubesangil's endorsement of the Labour Party presidential candidate, Pitalbib. Now, since the People's Democratic Party primaries in May 2022, Wike has been at odds with the party's presidential candidate, Tikua Buberka, insisting that a PDP national chairman, Yotar Ayu, must step down on the ground that he is from the same region as the standard bearer. With Abbasunja's endorsement, the governor had a scathing word for Tikua, who served as vice president on the Abbasunja between 1999 and 2007. And he worked with our presidential candidate for eight years. Did you understand me? He worked. And the campaign of our presidential council is that our presidential candidate, during the eighth year, did very well with his presidency, is it not? And one now considers that, look, having done so, then the principal would hand over to Nigeria, having done this is the person that I think she did this work better, is it not? But when the principal has gone and said no, he's the right person, it worried me. And that's why I said, look, something's fundamentally wrong. And instead of then to say, look, what do you think is wrong? He abused me. What did I do? I didn't do anything. All I wanted was a consign, something fundamentally wrong. And if you care for this party, it is for you to not go back. What is that as for the mentally wrong that this man did what he did? And then you are abusing me. I don't understand. I don't understand.


As we have responsibilities towards the living, we have responsibilities towards the dead. Within a limited period of time, after death, there is room for impacting the dead. Mahalaya Mausya is an important day in this direction. If the death is of a certain kind, within a certain limitations of time, there is a way to impact life that is beyond this body. It is a responsibility that everybody should filter that this is not a question of belief, this is not a question of religion, this is about understanding. The accumulation of body is not the beginning and this embodiment is not the end. That there are other dimensions to life and there are ways to impact those dimensions. This day, Mahalaya Mausya is very significant for that. So that is why this Kalabhairava Karma and the way of impacting this culture has deeply invested in this because we saw that our responsibility for a life is not over with the end of the body.