We can win this war. We can win this war? OK, well joining us from Orlando, Florida is the man in that clip, Anthony Dream Johnson, who says he wants to abolish feminism and make women great again. No, but it also says, with a trademark, make women great again, always great. Make women great again. But they're going to do a three-day seminar for women led by all men. In mansplaining news, a three-day conference for women led by men hopes to make women great again. How the 22 convention will make you the greatest you ever. Raise your femininity by 500%. First of all, how is a man supposed to tell a woman how to be the ultimate woman? A woman needs to be taught how to be great again. Oh, yes, we do. How to land a husband. How to lose weight.  Why do men think they need to fix the problems of women? Well, it says the world's ultimate event for women. Yeah, Orlando, Florida, that's going to be the scene of the crime. It's mansplaining Palooza. And say no to the toxic bullying feminist dogma. Taught by men to make women great again. Taking the stage now is the founder of the 22 convention you're in for a treat, Mr. Anthony Dream Johnson. Anthony Dream Johnson. The first president of the manosphere. It's run by all men, which promises to, quote, make women great again. This course is guaranteed to raise your femininity by 500%. Together, we will make women great again. Excuse me, I'm mansplaining here. She said there's nothing wrong. Welcome back to the 22 convention, 2021 in Orlando, Florida, the second inaugural, I'd say second inaugural, the second anniversary, the second going of a highly controversial event. We are literally in presence of somebody who does incredible things. This is a man who defies reality. He creates it. He has an idea, and he manifests it. He aspires, and he's determined and puts in more work than I've ever seen anybody do. And he's always had that reputation. This event is outrageous because we dare to do it. And I think that is a crying shame. It's a mark on our civility. What we're doing is we're having the audacity to speak to each other, and in particular, men to women, in this particular case, with the presentations. And I have the distinct honor and privilege to introduce the man who idealized this, made it come to fruition, and who, quite honestly, is moving the Overton window within the manosphere and men and women's communications and dynamic relationships, moving that back to a mainstream position to a more natural and sustainable environment. I introduce you to Anthony Dream Johnson. All right, ladies and back. I talked to you yesterday opening with the event. I appreciate you being at the event, seeing those speeches. I've been in and out, seeing a few myself, and I know some have been controversial, some are more smooth and mellow, ends on the speaker and the personality. I appreciate you getting through all of it and being here for it. You got me next.  There's a lot of truth to that, as Socrates kind of pointed out. But that's only one side of my personality, and there's a balance to it that you get to experience in real life. And today we'll get to see if you see a lot of that. So my speech last year, my keynote, the main speech, the content speech for the event that I gave, was called Motherhood First. And it was my initiative to begin a hashtag in sort of a small movement. Kind of like Make Him a Great Again itself or even the Tradwife movement that's not related to what we do necessarily, but is similar. It's pretty big on Twitter and hashtag stuff. So Motherhood First is my speech last year. I came out earlier this year. It's done pretty well. It's got, I don't know, 15, 20,000 views, something like that. So if you go check it out, I'm very proud of it. And the basic idea is that in America, Motherhood is put last. It is put behind second or third to career, advanced schooling, and all these things. I think this is biologically unsound at the point of being biologically irrational for women. Because women reach peak fertility to about 22, 23 years old. And by 30, over 90% of their eggs are dead. They reach advanced eternity age. Or by modern medicine, they call it geriatric pregnancies age 35 and beyond. Oh, yeah. Yeah.  They call it advanced eternity age. But it's all the way through the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, it was called a geriatric pregnancy. And basically at age 35, the risk of birth defects goes through the roof, down syndrome, autism, things like that. All kinds of problems, not just for the kid, but for the woman, for the mother. Child birthing problems, pregnancy problems, nursing problems after the fact, all kinds of stuff.   But they wither and diver.  And they get opposite propaganda on top of that. But they're not educated at all, that their fertility is heavily slanted towards their late teens and 20s. And it falls exponentially off a cliff rapidly. And a lot of them honestly don't know that, which is a problem because now they can't even make an informed decision. In a way they're being deceived and manipulated through a lack of information. I think to some extent this is intentional and it's retarded. I really don't like it, it's dumb. It hurts kids and it hurts women and it hurts America. So I don't like it. Anyway, that was my speech last year. So I'm not gonna have a repeat of that, we're gonna make a sequel to that. And that title is, make women virgins again. You might see that on my hat as well, of course. I thought of this actually randomly earlier this year. Very similar to make women great again. That was inspired by actually another hat that was similar to that. I made that and I fell in love with it immediately. And make women virgins again just kind of randomly came to me.  And then I was like, what about virgins? And I typed it out on the computer screen to actually print it and order it. And I was like, oh yeah. And I knew it would do pretty good, but man I put it out and then I had it printed and shipped and started wearing it. And I was amazed at the responses. You know, I wore a toxic masculinity hat that says 100% toxic masculinity. I wore hats like make women great again. I wore these in public. Bars, huge conferences like CPAC in Orlando in Texas, all kinds of different venues, you know, grocery store. And I look at people's responses to them. But make women virgins again, this hat, amazing. Next level, even above and beyond make women great again, which as you saw with the media in 2020, when nuts, New York Times, New York Post, Piers Morgan reached 100 million women just by saying that men, we wanna get together and make women great again. Indicating that women in pride generations were in some ways better. They were more feminine. They were more healthy, less obese. All kinds of different issues. Anyway, we're gonna get into this topic here. Make women virgins again. But right off the bat, I wanna say that it's not some born again virgin thing. I'm not into that. It has nothing to do with that. Obviously I would see if people would ask that, but it has nothing to do with that at all. I myself, I'm not a Christian or any kind of religion like that. I'm an atheist and objectivist. There's a lot of Christians who speak here at our events, men, fathers, and women events. But I myself, I'm not that at all. There's just buddies of mine and we share a lot of common values. We get along pretty well. And I love seeing that and I love these platforms being open to people of multiple faiths, different fundamental ideas about life. But we have common ground. We get together, we talk to you ladies. So today we're gonna talk about making women virgins again. So right off the bat, this is me wearing the hat with a media pass, no less, no different from CNN or people like that at CPAC in Texas. CPAC is a conservative political action conference. It's a huge, it's like the biggest Republican conservative event in the United States. That was the second one they held this year. It was a little bit smaller than the one in Orlando held right here on our drive earlier this year too. President Trump was at both thousands and thousands of people. It was my first experience at these major political events. Also wanted to do a disclaimer that I'm not really a conservative or Republican. People assume this about me a lot. Like they assume I'm a Christian because I hang out with like pastors and stuff and all these hardcore Christians, but I'm not. We get along really well.  I'm a heretic. I'm like, yeah, whatever, man. But anyway, I love going to these events this year. It was a real privilege. I had some buddies like Eric Carroll who's in the back here who had other media access to the event and introduced me to a lot of people. I really appreciate that. And it was an amazing experience at all the events I went to this year. We're going to have to more of them. But anyway, I wore this hat to CPAC and it taught me a lot about the different responses. Like I'm kind of hinted at in my opening address to you. I had the responses that make women virgins again. And this idea, this thrust would get from different age groups, different demographics, different generations. Young women, older women, young men, older men, men in the middle. Even some teenagers I met at these events gives kids like 15, 16, so Zoomers and stuff. But what I found is number one, in mainstream culture there's this meme that Zoomers, these young kids are based and they're savage. And boomers are old and decrepit and dumb. And I actually found the opposite. I found later in the year I went to, we'll get into in a minute, I went to a non CPAC event. I went to another event run by another organization, allegedly for Republicans and conservatives and all this stuff. Who like Christians I get along with. I'm not exactly that. I'm more of like my politics so much more with the founding fathers than I ran. And the media tries to paint Republicans and conservatives as that. And the reality is a lot different. Some of them are, a lot of them aren't.  I'm like 100% Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, I ran all these people. Some people say that's radical. I think it's dumb. These people founded our country. These men, these founding fathers. And my respect for them is infinite. And I really wish that the media portrayal of those people was accurate. That they're super based, you know, founding fathers people and they're not. I am, a lot of my friends are, but a lot of mainstream politics is not.   Anyway, I did find, this was surprising to me as well I'm pointing this out. And I think a lot of people will be surprised by this too but boomers are much more based. They're much more friendly to ideas and discussions about masculinity and femininity and culture and marriage and family relationships. Much more so than I thought. And a turning point in USA events with zoomers, it was not like that. A lot of young kids are much more put off by make women virgins again. They were annoyed by it. No one like attacked me or anything. But it was older people, older Gen Xers and boomers who found it funny. They wanted to ask me about it. They were curious. They were open-minded. They took selfies with me and stuff, the men and the women. And I think one of the main reasons for that is just the internet. The internet changed the world in the late 90s and 2000s. And these zoomers have known nothing but social media and advanced high-speed internet. Boomers and Gen Xers have grown up in a world completely different and in America completely different.  But anyway, I thought it was really important. And again, it really shocked me, particularly with the virgins hat which triggers people to a super high degree. Above and beyond even all my masculinity hats and make them great again. And this is going to be important as we go through this so we'll go back to this. So I want to illustrate a tale of two booths. So when you go to these giant conferences, they have all these booths and stuff. Like expo, media, podcasts. You'll see Bright Bar. You'll see Fox News. Tommy Lorne will be doing interviews. Some of my buddies will be doing interviews. I'll be doing interviews. All this cool stuff, right? What I found in the CPAC events, on the right there you see a screenshot. I make trailers when I go to these events. It's got a hobby for me, like a vacation almost. Sounds funny, but that's fun for me. On the right to screenshot of a Students for Life, it's an anti-abortion booth basically. They talk to young women about abortion issues. They advocate as best they can to different channels, protesting and stuff, picketing, whatever, against abortion. And I'm in favor of that, but independent of that I just wanted to talk to them. Ask some questions, talk about the hat and all that. And I found that not surprising that the anti-abortion booths were much more friendly into this hat, make women virgins again. Basically endorsing and supporting the idea of female virginity in America. Which I think over the past couple of decades has fallen off the cliff completely.  I lost my virginity at 17, but that was like prom night senior year, so it was a little more traditional I guess. But they start really young. And I think for most of American history, this is completely abnormal, completely totally 100%. But anyway, I found those organizations, Christian organizations almost exclusively anti-abortion, right, to be very friendly to these ideas. And they would talk about it with me, they do interviews with me. On the left, I didn't have a screenshot of the exact booth, but basically at Turning Point USA, I found their event. It was a fine event too, I can't criticize the event. It was impressive, technologically. I mean, I love making events and what they do is even higher than CPAC. I was impressed. That actually caught me by surprise too. But at the Turning Point USA event, I found a booth for, I forget the exact name, but it was like, it was a booth all about Christian conservative college age women. And they wanted to reach out to College Age conservative Christian women, right? It was very specific. And so I went up and talked to them and I had this hat on. And I'm like, hey, I don't do like that hit video stuff.   But I'll talk to people and ask pretty intense questions. So I found this booth at Turning Point USA event. It was young girls, they were all like probably 20 to 23 years old, three of them. And I asked them, you guys are a Christian organization, right? I said it right on the banner, but I wanted to like verify. And like, yeah, it was for college Christian women, blah, blah, blah, blah. I'm like, cool. So to Christian women, is it a sin for them?   You know how to wedlock? And they just went, they got so mad so fast when I asked them a basic Christian question. And I'm not a Christian. I'm an atheist, right? I don't have a dog in this fight. I'm an observer. I just want to ask questions and see what people say. And they knew the answer to this question, right? I've never met a hardcore Christian that understands these issues that wouldn't say, yeah, you're not supposed to do that. It's a sin.  It's different per denomination and I don't have a full understanding of all that. But the pastors tell me like, yeah, 100%.   They try to censor him at Christian conferences from talking about sexuality, young people. They say, no, you can't talk about it.  But that's where Christian organizations in America are at. As a pastor who's supposed to teach people from this holy book, the Bible, about virginity and sexuality and marriage, they want to censor him.  They just go silent. They actually went, we're not answering that. It's a whole attitude. They went from friendly, like, hey, what's going on?  I was, so this was kind of a boomer, zoomer thing once again, right? The boomer people find it funny. They take pictures with me. They ask what it's about, because they're a website, right? The zoomer girls who are Christian, this is an explicitly Christian organization to get mad. And this to me is indicative of where Zoomers are at versus the boomers and older Gen Xers and stuff. And it's also indicative too of where American culture is at with regard to female virginity or even virginity at all and preserving it and valuing it and respecting it and encouraging it. That's just gone out the window. These zoomer girls don't even know it's alien to them. Like, it's like from another, I might as well be speaking Chinese to them, Chinese that makes them really mad for some reason. Now, I went to another conference too.  They revoked my ticket before I even showed up. This is actually a screenshot of a video we posted from another channel. And it's from the Young Americans for Liberty organization that is, they claim to be like a Republican conservative thing, but they're not. They're like a libertarian organization. They were founded before they became organized as a nonprofit as like youth for Ron Paul. I love Ron Paul, I mean, 100%. He was a libertarian candidate president, 1988. He eventually transitioned back to the Republican party. But it's a Ron Paul hardcore libertarian organization more or less, right? They kind of role play as Republican conservative. That's just for like appearances because nobody votes libertarian. They don't win like anything. So they try to push their ideas and I don't want to get in the weeds on that, but it is what it is. Anyway, so I went to the two CPAC events for conservative and Republicans are at. And then the turning point USA event, which had a lot more zoomers and young people, it was for college age people. But this event, they kicked me out. He was libertarians who saw Ron Paul, the guy I love and respect, and they supposedly do too.  Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul, who is the, I call him the patient zero of cancel culture. The media tried canceling him in 2008 and 2012, when he ran for president as a Republican, kind of like Trump did in 2016 and 2020.  And these people kicked me out of an event. They revoked my ticket before I even got there. Didn't tell me. And it was all this screwed up process when I got there, but eventually this kicked me out. And they said, your brand doesn't fit with our event. Why? Because my brand is anti-feminism explicitly, right? This is pretty obvious at this point in a thousand different ways. You can read unlimited articles about feminists bitching about me on the internet. So that's not inaccurate, but I was stunned that I'd be welcomed to give an immediate pass at these conservative events. I'd be respected. They wouldn't kick me out. I was just in a tiny like anyone else or follow their rules. I filmed cool videos with, you know, I even interviewed Hercules, Kevin Sorbo, the actor at CPAC and the Green Beret at another event running for Congress in I think Washington state, Joe Kent. So I'm doing cool stuff. I'm publishing it to a huge channel. And basically I have an audience of like 350,000 men, young men. These conferences should be reaching out to me begging me in some sense, or I don't get too high or so about it, but I have access to a lot of men who don't care about politics too too much. Depends on the individual, but they're interested in ideas about masculinity and patriotism and freedom. They should be hunting for people like me. And instead, and now they were friendly, right? At this CPAC and Tony Point events, this event can kick me out. Could not believe it. And in the spirit of Ron Paul's, I need to reach out to Ron Paul actually and make him aware of this. He would be furious about this. And this guy is an old man now. He's like nine years old. He almost died I think earlier this year. He had a heart attack or something like that. But the guy's a legend. And this is angering me to no end. But it showed me what losers libertarians have become.  And now they can't even tolerate someone saying, I don't like feminism.  They can't tolerate it. They kick you out of events.  They're part of the zombie cult of weirdos. Now, getting back to virginity and how it affects women. This is an article from the Atlantic. They've done hit pieces on the Manisphere community that I'm a part of, a leader in. Very profeminist on our website. They've done all kinds of stupid stuff against friends of mine, against different movements that I'm a part of. So I pulled this from them on purpose. Because this is actually an article from them illustrating exactly what I'm talking about with female virginity and how it's gone out the windows of value in our country and in our culture and our people. The title is, fewer sex partners means a happier marriage. What a shocker, right?  This is a little quote I pulled from them. In case you can't read it, I'm just gonna read it out loud. It wasn't really designed for you to read necessarily. Over at the Institute for Family Studies, Nicholas Wolfanger, a sociologist, excuse me, at the University of Utah, has found that Americans who have only ever slept with their spouses are most likely to report being in a very happy marriage. Meanwhile, the lowest odds of marital happiness about 13 percentage points lower than the one partner woman, belong to women who have had six to 10 sexual partners in their lives. For men, there's still a dip in marital satisfaction after one partner, but it's never as low as it gets for women as Wolfanger's graph shows. And this is the graph here on the right. I've actually pulled from that website, Institute for Family Studies. Basically, when you have too many partners, your ability to pair bond diminishes over time. And for women, the drop-off is much more severe and significant. One of the ways my old friends defend Malani, one of our speakers for men. You might know him from YouTube. He got banned like a year ago. He had like a million subscribers, philosophers, and Malani. He described pair bonding like Velcro.  It doesn't work anymore after a while. Put through the wash too many times, gets too used up, it goes away. This is true for men too. And people don't understand this about me in our events, but I firmly believe that and I wouldn't deny that. The issue is for women, it's an exponential fall off a cliff. It happens real fast and the damage is real intense and it doesn't go away nearly as easily if at all. Evil Michael Foster is a pastor, right? You saw him speak here. He's told me to my face.  But he'll agree with me. For both, that's true, he says in his worldview, right? But for women, he says it's a lot more intense to damage. And he sees this in his life as a pastor at his churches and talking to families and men and women and marriages and couples. And this graph I think demonstrates that so basically men are the yellow line and women are the blue line. Other speakers too in our past have discussed this like against Defend Malinu, a lot of other speakers as well. I have a quote here on the left that I think lines up with this perfectly. And this is a quote from my favorite philosopher, a woman actually. Jesse Lee Bustamasson, that's one of her speakers. Not too long ago, it was pretty funny. He wonders why I follow the advice or the leadership and ideas of a woman and that's because truth is truth. Where an idea comes from doesn't necessarily dictate its truth. Truth is true, reality is reality. Existence exists. But the quote is, you can evade reality but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality. Again, you can evade reality but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality. This is a quote that young women in America, especially in the 20s, but even in the late teens, they need to embed and ingrain in their face and in their head. They really need to get this through the skull because they don't want to hear it, right? They think they can act like men. Basically, I view men as seed sprayers, right? Some men are designed to, in an evolutionary sense, they can have sex with a lot of partners. If I knock up 10 women in a month, the risk to my life in terms of getting eaten by an animal is zero. If you get pregnant from a guy, you have sex, an animal can eat you. You become increasingly defenseless over the next nine months. You can't even run at that one point, right? After a certain point, you have a huge, you have a baby in you, you're defenseless.  You can't defend yourself, you can't feed yourself and support yourself or it's super, super hard. For men, it's the opposite. There's one of the consequences, right? Genghis Khan, notoriously in history, he has over a thousand children or something, right? Like a huge percentage of Asian people have genetic lengths, their descendants basically have Genghis Khan because the risks to men are almost zero and for women, it's huge. So young women need to hear this. You can evade reality, you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality and they think that they can act like men, they can act like seed sprayers, so to speak, with impunity and reality is, feminism doesn't get along with reality, it's put it that way and if you deny your own nature, Socrates, for example, the guy introduced me, a very close friend of mine, he says that nature will win and young women today, I think they can get away with denying nature and with no consequences and the real life does not work that way.    I wanna live in alignment to my nature as a man, I wanna be masculine, that's good for me, I wanna be a good animal based on the way I was born, designed by nature or God or whatever. Doesn't really specifically matter to me in that sense. It's I wanna live in alignment to who I am on my DNA. Women need to do this too and that means being feminine, pursuing femininity as much as you can over a lifetime.  And when they deny them, we'll get into it, we'll get back to that in a second. I did wanna point out, like I said, that feminism is failure. This is a little clip we cut from Coach Greg's speech last year at 22 Convention. It's about a five minute clip, not too long, it's on YouTube, check it out. And in this clip, he overviews the mass of failure of feminism. All the statistics of you are proven with it, they're associated with it, they're terrible, terrible, terrible, terrible. For example, 72% of inmates in state prisons are raised by single mothers. I think single motherhood is a direct product of feminism. It's astronomical skyrocketed since feminism became a thing in the United States, particularly for black families, but really all families, except Asians for some reason, seem like immune to feminism. But one issue I wanna mention, like I briefly hinted at, that he did not hit on and I think no one wants to talk about as I think the rise of feminism as a cultural dominant force in the United States has led to a lot of birth defects, a raise in birth defects in children. No one wants to talk about this, but feminism has basically pushed the age of motherhood further and further and further down the timeline as they continue to prioritize schooling and career first before motherhood. They put motherhood last basically.  That means your children are at a higher risk of birth defects. It doesn't matter what your beliefs can be whatever you want. Reality is reality and your beliefs don't dictate it. Your opinions don't dictate reality. One of the, another quote that I should share with you from a philosopher named Francis Bacon, Anran was fond of this comment too, is that nature to be commanded is to be obeyed. Nature to be commanded is to be obeyed. When you disobey it, like the Anran quote, there's consequences. Some of those consequences are not just for you, it's for your children, it's for the babies. And I've never seen for some reason anyone talk about this on the internet that feminism in some way, shape, or form leads to birth defects in children. Permanent stuff, right? Down syndrome, autism, all kinds of really horrible stuff. For what? So a woman can have a career at 25 instead of 35? Like this makes no sense, it's crazy. Anyway, you should go check that out. This is great, so this is Lori Alexander. I interviewed her earlier this year for a little over two hours on my YouTube channel. I did want her at the event, but she's battling a pretty serious form of cancer right now, so she couldn't make it. Hopefully she gets healed from that, comes here next year. She loves what we're doing and I'm really happy to have her at the event in the future. This is a super fun interview though, you should check it out. It's on 21 Studios, about two hours, Lori Alexander, you can just type the internet's most base grandma. I think we'll pull it up. I think she is, right? But I bring this up because one of the most common rebuttals when I talk about female virginity, this hat and public at events, conferences, right, whatever, people say, what about men? We're talking like within five seconds, right? If they're not like totally triggered, like screaming at me like, we're not answering that, right, they go, what about men? We're like literally 10 seconds in a conversation and what do they want to do? They want to deflect the conversation of men immediately. Now, we could talk about that, but that's not what the subject is, right? This is basically a manipulation tactic. It's a logical fallacy. I want to talk about a specific issue, right? That's completely legitimate. I'm not saying that male virginity is not a thing we talk about. Christians certainly would, right? Not Michael Foster, other pastors, stuff like that. That's fun. It's the feminist in particular and women who are indoctrinated by feminism in ways they may not even realize. They want to punt the issue away from women and deflect it and hide it. No, we're going to talk about female virginity like we have been here, right? And this needs to be normal in the culture again. Why can't we talk about this? Why do people get so mad, right? I don't go up to people insulting them about these issues. I ask them questions. They can't handle it.  Snowflakes basically, George Carlin stuff. Anyway, I bring this up because Laurie, she was a virgin when she got married to her husband. I think his name's Ken. I haven't talked to him yet, but I've talked to her a lot through email, obviously on video. She was a virgin when they got married a long time ago. And he was a virgin as well. So I asked her, if you're a husband, and she's hardcore Christian, this woman is like a female Michael Foster. She loves Michael Foster. It's like her favorite, right? I'm like, all right, if your husband was not a virgin when you guys met and when you got married, you still married him. You can watch him video. She goes, absolutely. Boom, immediately. Zero hesitation, which is indicative that men and women are different. It doesn't mean, and so I asked her this question too, because that lines up with her beliefs. She's a hardcore Christian. Virginity before marriage is important to her. I'm an atheist, right?  It isn't that specific consequence, burning fall eternity. It doesn't really matter to me. I'm interested in the consequences here in real life on this planet and here on this earth in my one life. But she was, she flat out said, no, I would have still married him, 100%, right? No problems with that. Even though she thinks that's a sin, this is like a really serious thinker. And she takes her religion very seriously, which I respect, I respect that a lot. So a basic foundational idea for the manosphere, like a 21 congenital example, that's kind of the center of the manosphere community, is that men and women are different. And this to me illustrates that. And it's another reason why punting the issue away from women is false and it's dumb. But we can talk about men, but it's a different situation, it's a different context. We talk about female virginity, this is important, it's extra important, it's more important. And that's, I think her answer to that question kind of highlights that too, right?   Even when I was in college and the late 2000s is super common, right? This has gotten worse and worse and worse over time. But thought culture, losing virginity too young, not caring about it, not valuing it, disregarding it, disrespecting nature, this leads to the cat kingdom. It's a fast lane to the cat kingdom. I call it the cat, I love cats by the way. People think I hate cats because I do this stuff. I love cats. I feed half a dozen cats in my neighborhood. I'm a cat daddy. I have evidence of this, man. I can tame stray cats, all kinds of stuff. But this thought culture that's super normal today, right? This is an extreme version of it, Cardi B with their WAP stuff. But this has become normalized. This is basically, this is feminism to me, right? They don't say I'm a feminism, WAP or I'm feminist, right? WAP, it's not that explicit, but this is feminism. This is the end result of 100 years of feminism, unchecked, unchallenged. You're not allowed to talk about it. You're not allowed to challenge it, right? At all, anywhere.  Most men are weak and beta. How do you get past this? How do you be a real man? How do you be a husband and a father? That has been where we dropped the ball as men is because we're too accepting. We're too tolerant. I'm calling for intolerance for evil. We need to be able to properly identify with the definition, what is masculinity? We need men to stand up and do heroic things.  I call the official tagline for now, with 21 Conventions, is America's last stand for masculinity. I think it is. The event is a reflection of the man's spirit, really.  Not just talking about being masculine, but okay, you've done all the self-development. What are you gonna do with it?  And it all stems from female virginity not being valued at all. Like you can just be a man and there's a mean of consequences. No, it's women like this, it's sad, right? We can make fun of them and mock them with memes and stuff. It's really sad. There's no Sean Smith said it, that Dr. Sean Smith's speaking to our men over there. His buddy Ken was speaking to you on Sunday that there's no do-overs, right? Your virginity peaks at 22, that's it. It doesn't re-peak at 32 or 42. You don't get to wish it to come back by throwing a penny in a pond or something.  You've had advanced maternity age at 35 forever. And it'd be one thing if girls knew this and they were educated and they still did it. They're just doing it. They really don't even know. They have no idea. Girls hear this stuff and they're like, what? It's bad, it's toxic, it's terrible. And it's sad. As much as I might combat these people on the internet, make fun of them, make them really mad and kind of ruin their day, it's sad. I don't like seeing it. These are my country women, right? These are my fellow Americans, females. I don't wanna see them do bad. I wanna see them do good. And this is not good.   It's misery compensating itself through these other, it's probably an opposite projection, right? These women are both miserable. They just pretend that they're not.  Women even, I think women even get, a lot of speakers have talked about this like it's the fan of Malinu. Women basically, they want babies, right? The urge to breed for men and women is huge. That's another reason Socrates says nature will win, right? But basically they don't have kids and they replace them with cat babies. So it's the right idea, but the wrong species is what it is. This is a picture from last year. I can transition a little bit more personally here. So from my speech last year, I tell women that they should, when they're young, most women, not all, right? We live in a free country and we should.  The young women I think should get wifed up, knocked up to live happy. These are my nephews, I don't have kids. On the left, my left here, we got Tyson. On the right we got Bryson. They're about one year apart, little Irish twins, right? Now I got more. Now we got unlimited babies. I got another nephew too, right? Dylan in the middle, the new one from my older sister Maria. So those are on the left, those are left and right of brothers and the middle is Dylan, so are cousins now. Which is super cool. I had cousins too growing up, I still do. They live pretty far though from New Jersey. But I love seeing them, I love having them. And holding them really, I guess you could say, is a figure of speech, not literally, because I'm not Christian, but holding my nephews, especially the first one Bryson on the right, but all of them ultimately, Tyson, Dylan and Bryson. That put the fear of God in me. It really made me realize what my lifestyle of banging a lot of chicks over the years and all the stuff I was doing as a pickup artist and stuff like that, where this really goes, where this leads or where it can lead. And some of my friends, like Socrates, for example, once again, he's a five-year-old daughter. I was eating Thanksgiving with them when she was in the womb, like eight months and something days. I'm about ready to pop out and then a few weeks later she popped out. Now she's five, running around, right? She's not Uncle Anthony per se, but I've been around a lot, right? Socrates is a very close friend of mine. But that's different, right? She's not my blood. As much as I love Socrates and I appreciate his family and respect them and want to help them as much as I can. They're not my, she's not my blood relative. These ones are. These are my sister's kids. They mean a lot to me. They're not my sons, but they'll be the cousins of my son someday. They're important to me. I want to help them and nurture them and protect them, like my aunts and uncles did for me and still do to this day. So we're gonna talk about, you know, leading by example and recommendations.  Make them virgins. Virginity should be valued in America. It should be respected. It should be honored. It should be considered the foundation, even of femininity. At least Chastity, it's as well, and Chastity of virginity. These are like the corners on a starting point of femininity, right? They should be encouraged culturally. But I also want to lead by example. And like, what can I do? So this brass tacks, I think that's how you say it.  I've turned down probably even more than that. I was 17, I was passed like 15 years. And there are guys with way higher notch counts than that. There are guys, there's a guy speaking there right now with a notch count. Right now literally across the hall.  Yeah, it's pretty wild. I think there's, now that's not my lifestyle, that's like, unreal. But I still think there's a lot for men to learn from him. I don't think they should emulate that. But with that much life experience, that's like the Olympic gold medal of like, going out and being permiscuous, right? That's like, wild. I don't think guys should do that, or they still can learn from that. My life has been sort of similar to that, but nowhere near at that crazy high level. But what I realized basically, especially in my nephews, is that that life was leading to disaster. And you would even say, especially in my nephews being born, I was getting like a gut feeling as I was approaching 150, I was like, I don't feel good about this. Like I'm not a woman, but I don't think I'm invincible to losing my ability to pair bond, to connect, to build a relationship. At some point, like 1400, he's way past the point of being able to build a family. Now his values too are in alignment with that. He's one about family. That's crazy to me, but that's his life, that's what he's gonna do with it, right? But I don't wanna be that guy.  Sounds kind of like fun, but not really because children and family are a lot more important to me. My values are in alignment in this direction. And I think by far most people, men and women line up this way. They'll be the oddballs, right? They say prostitution is the oldest profession in the world. I don't really doubt it. There's always been these like hyper alpha males who will just slay women their whole life. But that's not me and most guys are not even, they're never gonna get anyone near that. For example, in America, the average lifetime partner account for men is like seven. And for women, it's like 10 or something. I don't know if I trust the women one to be honest. I think women are a lot more bad. Men tend to like pump their numbers up. Women tend to downplay them. It's kind of as what it is. I think it's still in truth though, that guy over there. Pretty wild dude. Anyway, what I stopped, what I decided, let me get a little more backstory on this too. I'm 33 now. And I lost my virginity at 17. I was in a five, four and a half year relationship where I was monogamous. Didn't cheat, nothing like that.  I think it's like for men and women both, you should not do that. Never mind if you're Christian or whatever, it's even more terrible. But what I realized is that the older I got, is the more wild and dangerous my behavior was getting. The pinnacle of this is when I bought a three pack of Plan B off Amazon Prime, because it was cheaper than getting it like a Walgreens. And I was like, this is like, and I never got any STDs thank God, but I realized this is out of control. This is gonna end in disaster. I was gonna end up, you know, let me say this too.  We have a guy here right now, Jeff Younger, going through that. The mother of his children is trying to castrate his son. I'm not kidding, look it up. Jeff Younger, CNN, Fox News, all over the place. It's terrible. These men that I know, I even know the kids sometimes, right? I get to know these people that live in Orlando. That kid, he's stuck with that woman for 18 years.  She might be crazy or not. Maybe she's just like kind of a bad woman. He's not virtuous or whatever, right? There's all kinds of, life's complicated. The point is, if I picked the wrong woman to be a mother of my kids, that kid, girl or boy, is stuck with that woman forever. Including after I'm dead.  That's when I was like, I can't do this anymore. This is not in alignment with my moral values. I'm done.  It's not fun anymore. It's getting like, I don't know if it's inhumane. It just, it lost all of its excitement and fun. And I think, I thought it was part of the danger element. I kept getting into like riskier and riskier sexual behavior. But also I think it was my brain, like my hind brain, right? Lizard brain, pushing me to breed. And I was like, this is gonna get me. Like however smart I think I am, that little lizard brain's gonna get me. And I ain't gonna beat him. I'm pretty good, right? I made it this far that I'm not gonna woman up. But I'm not perfect. I'm not invincible. I know that for a fact. I've learned that the hard way in my face in real life. I married a hooker back in like 2014, for example. An accident on purpose. It's on YouTube, you can check it out or you can do so. Anyway, I stopped having sex at a wedlock back in April. It's like I'm done. 100% done. And after behaving this way for so long, just doing kind of whatever I want. The exception of that relationship where I didn't cheat or anything. Yeah, I've just kind of done whatever I want. And I'm like, I'm done. I can't do this anymore, 100%. I don't need, you know, a lot of people immediately are like, oh, are you Christian or whatever? I'm like, no. This is not a God thing. It's not a religious thing, nothing like that. I just can't, I can't hold these babies and then engage in this behavior and reconcile with you. I'm like, this is sick. This is done. It doesn't mean it's not fun. Although I did lose a lot of fun over time.  But anyway, that's how I lead by example. And I don't think women should do that.  They're going to watch this and like download it and hate it, whatever, right? I don't think though they should do this. This is my decision. I'm leading my life the way I want to do it. I think young women in America, if they watch this, the few that watch and actually care and are interested in making their life better, they should do something different. So feminism, I think, has encouraged women to lead relationships, including sexually and stuff, and this is bad. Men have to lead, lead their families, marriages, relationships, all of it. If women lead, women are not happy. If men lead, men are happy and women are happy. That's how that works. You can be mad about it, whatever, I didn't make the rules as how it is. But if you say you're not going to have sex anymore, like the boyfriend or ever again, out of wedlock or anything like that, this is you trying to lead in a way that's not going to work. You might think it's going to work, it's not going to work. It's going to blow up in your face. I think what women should do is commit, and I got this idea from a friend, actually, years ago in another situation. It's just kind of observing something else going on.  If they're in a position where they want to get married, they realize they've done a lot of wrong, whether they banged too many guys, 10 or 50, at that point they're probably just broken, but they basically need to commit to marrying the next man they have sex with. Not maybe, not probably, not 80%, not all try my best, 100,000% committed, period, done. That's it. So that's different than what I've done.  But women should do something different, and I think that's pretty reasonable. And well, the guys that didn't hear that might be like, what the fuck? But I think what women need to do, especially young women, right? They don't know a lot about dating at all. That's why they get burnt out on Tinder, banged up all these alpha males and the whole life's ruined, right? They end up cat ladies, the WAP stuff. Boom. But I think, let me go back to this actually. I think what young women need to do, though it's killing me, is they need to look at a man's family. They need to stop focusing too much on themselves and even on him. They need to look at his surrounding environment and the context. That means his family, like how many brothers and sisters does he have? Or his parents married, right? How many cousins does he have? What are those relationships like? They need to look well beyond the man before even considering his own intentions, right? Unless he just says flat out, like I don't want to do this, it's never gonna happen. He's a player, kind of guy like that, or a fuckboy as we call it in today's culture. But they need to stop looking so much at the individual. They need to look at the whole picture, right? Religious beliefs, family, you know, divorce is their divorce and the family, all kinds of stuff. If they do that and they commit 1,000% to marrying that guy beforehand, whether or not they disclose that is up to them. That's a shock call you gotta make on your own. Probably you should disclose it, but again, you gotta make that decision yourself. The young girls should, they should look at the whole picture beyond the man himself. So in summary, I believe firmly that chastity and virginity are foundational to femininity. I think this has been a normal idea for probably not only hundreds of years in America, but thousands of years in our civilization. Thought culture is masculine behavior and it's self-destructive.  That's not fun and you can't undo it. There are no do-overs. This is not a video game. You don't get to hit the reset button and play Mario over again. You're fucked, you're done. You screwed up and you can't undo it. Not good. Sex is fun, but it can be dangerous, particularly for women.  That's the whole trainwreck on itself. And we need to revalue female virginity in America ASAP. This is, I really think that, you know, political conservatism, like we were overlooking earlier, you know, one of the reasons I'm not a political conservative so much, and I identify much more explicitly with being a patriot and defining fathers than I ran is it's a failure. Like these ideas make them angry to the point that they don't even wanna talk about them. You don't agree, okay, let's talk about it and maybe debate, right? I'll debate anybody on this stuff. They don't wanna talk about it. They get obsessed with policy stuff, right? The wall and this and that, blah, blah, blah. They never look at the deeper, bigger picture, the roots of what's happening. And it's stuff like masculinity, femininity, divorce rates, virginity, particularly for women, right? This is super taboo and it should not be. These are the main things they should be talking about. This is what makes real change. You know, and then it's even beyond conservatives though, look at Christians today in America. They can't even Michael Foster as a pastor, certified pastor, schooling, all this stuff, right? He goes to the big Christian conferences, they try to tell him, no, you can't talk about that. They're de-platforming themselves, right?  I didn't even wear this hat, right?   Like they need, and I think there's hope with the boomers in particular, but yeah, that's why, that's one of the reasons I don't identify, they don't get it. They really, truly, fundamentally don't get what culture is the way it is.  They wanna blame, they'll blame the Democrats, their bulls, no, they don't get it. It's sex, there's nothing more foundational in our species than masculinity and femininity, than men being men and women being women. These idea, these forces in our culture and in our species are hundreds of thousands of years old. They're older than the wheel, they're older than fire, they're older than language, way older than civilization, any religion, God, all this stuff. There's nothing more foundational.  You lead the species, you've lost the context at that point. These forces are beyond foundational and fundamental to who we are as human beings and to how our whole world operates, not just America, not just the West, everywhere. And we're all human beings and we all have to respect our nature, if we wanna live well with each other and even as individuals in our lives, from micro to macro. So that's my speech. Make women virgins again. I appreciate your time. I appreciate being here at the event and I hope you enjoyed my talk. If you want, I can take some questions. Sure. There's a microphone, audio, can we get our mic? Oh, yeah, cool, thank you. He's gonna unmute it for you. Hang on a second. You can just ask it and I'll repeat it. Yeah, sure. I think the Zoomers are the children of Gen Xers. I'm not like a generational sociologist expert on that, but I think the kids born now are the next one after Zoomers, I think. That's pretty recent too. Yeah, it keeps going. I'm a millennial. Millennials, man, I know we're starting with millennials. Yeah. I'm in the middle too, right? I'm not even an old one or a young one, so. Yeah. My understanding of stands for that ho over there. It's basically how Zoomers today, I think Zoomers made this up. Yeah, it's slang. Ho. Over there. She's gonna get an A plus on the quiz after the end of the event. Now I think it basically just means ho. It's like a new way to say ho, but they can hashtag it and it's not a curse word then. Ho, H-O-E. That ho over there, like a garden tool. Oh, oh, oh. I thought she meant W-H-O-R-E. And so for the camera, she was asking what thought means and I had to explain to her what the acronym means. Well, thank you. I don't know these things either half the time. There's so many new acronyms like this that people make up. Well, that, therefore my question. Yeah, yeah. Okay, well, thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. I think she has one there. Hey. Right, yeah. Thank you. I have, I guess I have an overarching question and some comments. So I work with women. I've been working with them for over 20 years in coaching. And I had to do some peeling myself and it started in 2015. I was a very driven woman, still am. And I was married for 22 years in a relationship for 25 years. Wow. I had to figure out how I contributed. So I think whenever you have a problem, you point finger to self first. And so I've been to deep diving since 2015 on relationships in general. And in coaching women, there's a general pain. They don't feel the joy of the things that they've achieved there in relationships where they don't feel passionate, held, seen and heard and the men too. And that they feel guilty as mothers. Now, when we're talking about the subject of sex, I do see that women are, men are the key and women are a lock.  Because you are going to carry more of that.  So you have to be very careful about what energy is deposited in the body. And I think though extreme and anything is extreme. So in working with women, and I work with a lot of women in Utah actually, where Mormon culture is big. And so I'd like to go to that slide if you don't mind. Oh, the Utah people. Because that's where the study was done, was in Utah, where there's a high rate of Mormons. We got a woman in the back too right now. We're being a virgin is huge. And the challenge that I found is that when women are extremely promiscuous, it's a lack of self love. And what happens when they're extremely virginal, they begin to have a lack of self love. I have a comment on this if I can pause you here. So I think it's, let me say this, I think women saving sexual marriage is super cool. It's also, it can be very dangerous that you can blow up on your face. I mean, you basically are trying to get the first guy to be the right guy for a long, long time. That's not easy. I think young women should count much more so on family. Actually not even, they're a media family if they can trust them. Brothers and sisters, I have a lot myself. But even beyond that, I think aunts, uncles and cousins are some of the best judges you can have around you. If you're fortunate enough to have that. Agreed, yeah. In fact, Because they're less biased than your family. In fact, in foreign culture, like I'm half a foreign culture, it's very much you look at the whole family. And the family has to approve of your partner more or less for it to feel right because they become a part of your whole immersion. Because who can have foresight of 50 years when you're 19? Like this is really hard to get that right. Yeah. And if you're partnering with a man that's under 25 when his mind isn't developed yet, his physical brain isn't developed yet. And by the way, if you're on the pill, it changes your chemistry. So the smell changes. And then you don't even know who your right partner is when you're on the pill. Because once you get off you, actually the pheromones would be different. But anyway, so, so women get to, the thing that's challenging to me is that so I'm glad you said that they should have some partners before because if they don't get to love themself and get to know themself and get to know that there are differences in that intimacy, there's a lot of misery.  And the only difference between friendship and marriage is the intimacy piece. So what I'm noticing is that sorry, I made a note and I don't know what it is. Let me get to, okay. So if you notice that in the curve, there is a point where she bottoms out at six to 10, right? So in Utah, there's a lot of shame of course if you do have sex outside of marriage. So I can imagine that if the study was done there, these women in particular have a societal conditioning since childhood that they should be ashamed of themselves to be a promiscuous young girl. I completely support that by the way. Like shame is not a bad, shame is like anger, it can be bad or it can be useful. Shame is the lowest vibration in emotional energy which doesn't allow a person to rebuild when they carry shame.  It can, but that's also, there's a challenge there because there's judgment and individuality and personal journeys that have to do with it. I think men should be ashamed too for abandoning their families and if they do that, 100%. And that needs to be said, they should be ashamed for that. Not just, it's a difference of opinion in like their lifestyle.  If you're hurting someone, absolutely. Yeah, so that's kind of our mouth position. Yeah, so there's a line. So, but then you see how it spikes back up again.  And I'm not saying you should have that many partners. I'm just saying what that indicates to me is a reclamation of themself at some degree. To understand that they can go. Interesting and useful, it's not, it's a map, it's not the territory. So if you did a study like outside of Utah, you might get different numbers, they could be worse, they could be better. Utah of course is a bastion of traditional values in America, I just went there recently for my first time. I really enjoyed it, I was like, this is super cool. The rest of America is not like that right now. So, you know, other parts of the world, even more traditional and stuff like that. But anyway, the map is not the territory, so like this is really cool to look at. I'm not saying that's absolute truth, it's on this graph, it's just what they found. I don't even know the numbers and the quantity of people and things like that, they hadn't it. Yeah, but that's gonna go toward the point is that it's in a state that. Yeah, sure, and I don't deny that. And it could be biased in that sense. But I also think that valuing female virginity has been a common sense, female value for a long time. It's been a common sense culture value.  I'm for common sense masculinity and common sense femininity. Things that were known for thousands of years like our species has two genders. There's not 500, the gorillas have two, monkeys have two, baboons have two, we have two, not 500, we're not special. And the same is true of respecting things like female virginity. We didn't need studies a thousand years ago to say that letting 19-year-old woman bang 10 dudes off, there's no tender then, but if there was, it's dangerous. You could ruin your life if you get knocked up on the first guy, even if they don't get knocked up or an STD that ruins your life forever, like a permanent one. One guy, in the manuscript we say that the number of women is not really important, it's what happened, or the number of partners a woman has is not super important.  It's not like that. A woman can get really her heart broken by one guy. Maybe she only has three partners, super low, but one dude bangs her heart up and she's ruined her life. She'll be haunted by that guy 20 years later, still talking about him. I know friends who, data girls are older, 40s and 50s. Let's talk about an ex-boyfriend, he'll be like a buddy of mine, you guys are seniors, like when was that relationship 20 years ago? Like, and that can happen to men too, but I think it happens to women a lot more easily, and that's part of how men and women are different. It's dangerous. Men are seed sprayers, it's not as risky for us to do this. Women, it's very dangerous, physically and psychologically. It can, absolutely, yeah. And I think women though need to have permission to take their journeys and not feel shamed for it. For example, I had that exact thing happen, my boyfriend right before my husband, and he wasn't mean, he just never said he loved me unless we had sex, and then I left. And we were gonna get married and all of that. And it affected my entire marriage. But what happened though for me, that I cautioned and women just kind of, so Noah was the next one, my husband, he got the wounded side of me. I didn't get time to heal from that and have other experiences before locking into one that didn't give me time for growth and exploration to rediscover that that wasn't something to guard anymore. I was guarded. If I can comment on guarding and trauma, I think it's starting to get out of these issues. I think part of femininity itself, value and femininity and virginity included or not in context, I think part of femininity is preserving femininity. We say in the Manister, for example, our view of men and women is that masculinity is built. Like young men, getting laid when you're 30 as a man is way easier than a 20. A 20, you're a young kid, you're beside your teens, you don't have any money, you don't really know anything about the world, you're not very masculine yet, right? Your brain's not developed yet, you're not super logical, rigid, you're not like a badass yet. You haven't been challenged by the world and overcome it. With women as the opposite, femininity is mostly not built as preserved. That's part of where virginity fits in and valuing it.  That's a farce that they make up on TV. But I really think that femininity is preserved and virginity for women is part of that. Explicitly, physically, like you said, locking key stuff.  I don't think virginity is a preservation of femininity. I think sexual... Would you like to feel that chastity instead? I think sexual awareness and self-awareness and making conscious decisions, rather than that comes from grounding too, you have to understand on yourself. How do you feel about self-responsibility for women? What does that mean? Like you said, locking key. So for example, women hit diagnostic counts. I've had speakers at our men's conventions, they call men like me slut makers. And I'm like, no. I've had debates with some pastors even over this. I'm like, if a woman has had sex with like 35 guys and I'm number 36, for example, this has happened, I'm sure at some point, I'm not responsible for you being like, if that girl is considered a slut, let's assume that. I'm not responsible for that. I didn't make you bang 35 guys. Neither did the guy number 35, 30, 25, 20, 10, 15, some of these guys might have been just like, well, you had assholes along the way. But in total, she's the common denominator. And some people don't want to hold them responsible. I think even traditional sometimes, they don't want to hold them responsible for anything. They're scared of women. And public or otherwise, no. You're responsible for what you do as an adult. And assuming you didn't get raped, which I'm saying that didn't happen in this example, 35 or 30. Well, there's varying degrees of being sexually wounded. It doesn't have to have rape involved. And there's varying degrees of self-esteem issues. In the absence of rape, a woman is 100% responsible for her partner count. Not the men. Not any one of them. Not even together. Yeah, unless she was, yeah. There's a lot of factors in that. I don't disagree with that. What I'm saying is that we're talking about extremes. So there's extreme promiscuity and there's extreme virginity that can both be equally harmful to the psyche. Potentially.  That's an example. It's not perfect. Or even to waiting for the next guy I'm gonna have sex with is the guy. If you wait to 30, it could be too late. Yeah, there's context. If a woman's like 35 and you haven't ever been married, man, your chances of getting married like 13% at that point. So there's a lot of nuance to this. And what I wanna say is I ran my favorite philosopher's fond of saying that there are no guarantees in life. You probably know that elsewhere too, right? There's nowhere that's risk-free. No matter what advice, no matter what ideas you come up with or someone advises you, even if they're really good, there's nothing's risk-free, right? No matter what you do, no matter how well you plan, no matter how good you have family and friends and culture and whatever, it's not risk-free. It can always blow up in your face. As a man, as a woman, anything like that. So yeah, it can blow up in your face. It could be dangerous. But I still think that female virginity should be protected and valued and respected and encouraged, not forced, encouraged 100%. And public, churches, speeches like this, whatever. Our culture is lost completely at this point. This is probably the first time any man's got up in public in the past 30 years in a secular stage and said, female virginity is a good thing. We should talk about it, debate it, all that. This is not allowed. I would never get invited to a TED conference to talk about these issues, ever. Right or wrong, they wouldn't care. It's not allowed. And that's wrong. Does that answer your question? We've been talking about it. Yeah, there's a lot to talk about. Does anyone else have a question? I gotta wrap up in a minute. I'm gonna wrap up. All right, it's been a little bit over an hour. I appreciate your time. I appreciate you being here. Thank you very much. I'm Anthony Dream Johnson. Talk to you soon. Peace out. Thank you. We can win this war. We can win this war? Okay, well, joining us from Orlando, Florida is the man in that clip, Anthony Dream Johnson, who says he wants to abolish feminism and make women great again. No, but it also says, with a trademark, make women great again, for women, always great. Make women great again. They're gonna do a three-day seminar for women led by all men. In man-splaining news, a three-day conference for women led by men hopes to make women great again. How the 22 convention will make you the greatest you ever. Raise your femininity by 500%. First of all, how is a man supposed to tell a woman how to be the ultimate woman? Well, women need to be taught how to be great again. Oh, me too. Like how to land a husband. Oh! How to lose weight.  Why do men think they need to fix the problems of women? Well, it says the world's ultimate event for women. Yeah, Orlando, Florida, that's gonna be the scene of the crime. It's man-splaining platoosa. And say no to the toxic, bullying, feminist dogma. Taught by men to make women great again. Taking the stage now is the founder of the 22 convention you're in for a treat, Mr. Anthony Dream Johnson. Anthony Dream Johnson. Anthony Dream Johnson. The first president of the man-o-sphere. It's run by all men, which promises to, quote, make women great again. This course is guaranteed to raise your femininity by 500%. Together, we will make women great again.


Hi everyone! Welcome to a new video here on my channel. My name is Zyra and I post mainly art and drawing videos so if you'd like to watch more, be sure to check out my channel and subscribe. First of all, I want to thank Fashionary and more specifically Vicky for sending these products to me so I can try them out. I'm so excited to be showing these to you on video here on YouTube. I received them a couple weeks ago but I finally managed to edit the video and have it uploaded here. So, as some of you also might know, I am an affiliate of Fashionary which is why I received this product but that also means that if you are interested in purchasing the products that you see in this video, as well as any of their amazing products on their website, you can use my code Zyra10 for 10% off your entire purchase of Fashionary products. So, I will leave the link to their website in the description box so feel free to have a look and browse for their products and use that code to your advantage. I highly recommend checking them out and now on to the unboxing. There are two products in this unboxing and I'm going to start off with the memo pad. This retails for 14.19 US dollars on their website and it comes with 360 removable pages. So, it works like a memo pad. You can tear off the pages and basically use those pages anywhere that you want. These pages are 80 GSM cream colored paper so it's got that yellowish tint to it which I absolutely love and I also of course love the idea that these are removable because then you can put the drawings onto like a mood board which is how they've been marketed or you can insert them into your sketchbook. Each paper also comes with a figure template on one side and a technical template on the other side so you can use either side depending on what you want to create. So, the templates they're also lightly dotted on the pages so that they don't interrupt your drawings especially when you scan them. It's very hard to pick up on camera but you do see it in person and lastly this collection also comes in this gorgeous water resistant calico cover and it just looks so beautiful and chic. Also, this memo pad the size of it is 9.7 centimeters by 20 centimeters and it is also available in menswear if you are interested so that will be linked in the description box down below. The second product is the sketchbook which is very similar but of course also different because this time it is a sketchbook and not a memo pad. So, what they gave me was the A4 size sketchbook in women's wear but this is also available in a smaller A5 size and it also comes in menswear both in A4 and A5. So, the A4 women's wear it retails for 24.90 US dollars on their website and it comes with a 96 bleed proof 128 GSM cream colored paper and of course each sheet comes with two figure templates that are lightly dotted onto the page both front and the back so in a normal spread you get a total of four templates that you can use for your drawings. Another thing I absolutely love about fashionary and of course their sketchbooks is the information that they include in the sketchbook which I find to be very useful and very interesting. It's almost like a mini fashion dictionary and that takes up 15% of the sketchbook so there's a couple pages dedicated just for that. So, if you're a fashion designer or student or you're simply interested in fashion I feel like this is a really useful tool and resource and of course 85% of the sketchbook is dedicated to the blank pages with the fashion templates that you can use for your sketches. Similar to the memo pad the sketchbook also comes with this beautiful calico cover that I just every time I look at it I feel like I really want to customize it. The sketchbook also comes with a cotton ribbon bookmark that you can use of course but then at the back they also have their resources pamphlet and then a fashionary paper bookmark so you kind of have two which is really good and that is pretty much it for the products that I received from Fashionary. They look absolutely amazing and that is something to be expected with fashionary products. They are totally spot on when it comes to the aesthetic but also the functionality of their products and the quality so I can't wait to try them out and just before we get started with the demonstration I just want to add that Fashionary has a special launch offer for this Atelier collection so the first 200 customers to purchase any two items from their Atelier collection will receive a complimentary limited edition Fashionary pencil set so be sure to check out this collection through the links down below and once again that's the first 200 customers to purchase any two items from their Atelier collection will receive the limited edition Fashionary pencil set. Unfortunately I don't have this in the video to be showing you guys but be sure to check out their website and of course take advantage of my code Zyra10 for that 10% off your entire purchase of Fashionary products so that's basically like two amazing deals 10% off and if you're one of the first 200 then you also get a freebie. How amazing is that? Now on to the demonstration. So for the demonstration I am going to be doing a study of an 18th century dress and you will be seeing that on the left hand side of the page and then on the right hand side of the page I will be turning that 18th century dress into a 1970s look. So this is actually something that I am currently practicing like this is an exercise that I've given myself for a particular project in university so I am working on a show at the moment and I am the set and costume designer for a university project and we've been in the talks of creating a costume that takes inspiration from 18th century elements and silhouettes and cuts and then kind of transforms that into a 1970s look. So that's what I'm trying to do so basically I took a reference image of an 18th century dress and then I looked at the elements that they used for example of course the corset as like one piece and there's the handkerchief or like the shawl on the shoulder and then there's the skirt like that has like two layers with the opening at the front and I basically took those and found pieces that fit into the 1970s aesthetic and then kind of combined them together, styled them together to create a similar look. I hope that makes sense but that was kind of just an exercise that I was doing for myself just to kind of practice and see what things we might be able to come up with with other silhouettes so this is just like a trial version. I am also taking this time to practice how to draw clothing and creases in clothing especially when it comes to coloring and shading because that is something that I haven't really practiced in ages. I find that when I'm creating costume illustrations more recently is that I tend to go for kind of a cartoony look or a very digital blocky look and that usually means there's not a lot of creases happening or the creases sometimes are just very minimal and very simplified so I kind of wanted to practice creating creases on clothing that resembled what we actually see in real life so something that was a little bit more semi-realistic and I just wanted to try that with these illustrations so in order to do that of course I used reference images both for the 18th century gown and I also sourced a bunch of reference images and kind of just meshed them together to create the look for the 1970s outfit and I'm actually pretty happy with how this whole exercise turned out like in terms of how I tried to create the 1970s look from the 18th century and also with the practicing of the creases I think that I did pretty okay but of course there's always improvement for next time. As for the fashionary product I absolutely love it. This is such an improvement from their previous sketchbooks the ones that I've used before and the ones that I still also have in my sketchbook collections. I think the main difference obviously is the bleed proof paper like just having that makes this whole experience amazing because on their website they're really advertised that the bleed proof paper is perfect for markers and for watercolors. These are typically the materials that are used in fashion illustration or costume illustration but of course you can use other things as well like I use pencil for this one and I also used ink so I mainly used watercolors and of course it didn't bleed not at all there wasn't even any kind of ghosting or any paper reaction aside from the buckling. Sometimes if I use watercolors and especially if I use too much watercolors on the back of the page especially with the previous fashionary sketchbook you'd kind of see a little bit of the water like pooling so that didn't happen with this sketchbook which is really great and I haven't tried it with markers yet but I can already tell even just from the paper texture and the thickness of it that it will not bleed. I also used a black brush pen that typically bleeds as well sometimes if the paper is a little bit thick and it's not bleed proof sometimes it'll ghost where you can still like see a hint of it on the back of the paper but for this one also did not happen which is really really amazing so it's totally bleed proof based on my demonstration. The paper like I said it is quite thick but it is definitely not thick that it is able to handle watercolors in the same way that watercolor paper would so I'm totally fine with that I know there are people out there who like this is like a big no for them because the paper buckles but I kind of like how the paper buckles like I just love how that like the sketchbook looks after it's been used for a long time and you have all of these amazing watercolor drawings and illustrations and the papers have buckled and waved I personally like that so I have absolutely no problem with this but just be wary that if you are interested in this product the paper will buckle if you use watercolors it will not bleed but it will buckle so similar to the previous fashionary sketchbooks that's also happened but because it is a little bit thicker this new sketchbook the buckling isn't actually as intense so that's still an improvement for me. Another positive of course is that because it is bleed proof then we are able to use all sides of the sketchbook and that's something that is also an improvement for me I also really like the size of the fashion templates which I did touch on a little bit in the beginning of this video I really like the size of two templates together on a page rather than three smaller templates together on a page I think two is just a little bit more up to my taste there's still a lot of space in between like on the top of the pages or even in the bottom of the pages depends what you're creating or what you're drawing for any annotations or notes or if you want to stick any photos or maybe even something from the memo pad onto the pages of the sketchbook then I think there's still space for that and yeah I am just really really happy with this product I absolutely love it looks amazing and it also functions really well so I am so excited to keep using this I think the only thing I would probably like that was in the previous sketchbook and isn't on this one is probably the back pocket I sometimes like I'm not a big fan of the back pocket but sometimes I do use it so I kind of miss it and that it's not there but usually when it's there I I don't really I'm not like super happy that oh there's a back pocket like oh my gosh it's amazing sometimes I do use it but like it's not the most important thing but now that it's not there I kind of miss it so yeah but that's pretty much it aside from that I really really recommend using the sketchbook and purchasing the sketchbook if you are someone like me who is very much interested in fashion or costume illustration if you're studying a fashion design course or a costume design course or if you just like to draw clothes on people I think this would work really well too if you do a lot of character drawings because you can use a template and kind of change it up like you don't have to use a template as it is or on the pose as it is you can kind of change it up as you go but like I said super impressed with this product and I highly highly recommend it I won't be doing a demo of the memo pad in this video but stay tuned for a separate video on that and if you want to see more fashionary videos on my channel there will be a cards link in the top corner of this video so feel free to check those out and once again get in quick for that special launch offer where the first 200 customers to purchase any items from their Atelier collection will receive the complimentary limited edition fashionary pencil set and also take advantage of using my code when purchasing those two items my code is Zyra 10 and that gives you 10% off your entire purchase of fashionary products whether you want to buy just two items from their Atelier collection to get into that free pencil set or you want to add some more items into there because I do recommend that you check out their website and their range of products but with that said I will end today's video once again don't forget to click the links in the description box check out fashionary please give this video a like and subscribe if you enjoyed it share this video as well to fellow artists especially if you think they might be interested in this particular product or just fashionary in general and thank you so much for watching and I wish you the best of luck with your art journey and I will see you in my next one


Hi everybody, we're back live in Las Vegas. This is Dave Vellante from wikibond.org. We are covering a number of events today, the HP Gen 8 announcement. We got our man Jeff Kelly's at the Data Warehouse Institute. Stu Miniman's been hanging out with some of the guys from the VMware Partner Conference. A lot of action in Vegas this week and we're here with Richard Foshera, who is Vice President and Senior Research Analyst at Forester. Richard spends a lot of his time looking at converged infrastructure and data center issues, but also Richard spent a lot of time with customers as well. Welcome to theCUBE. Thank you, this is always a treat. Yeah, good to have you. Well, let's see, let's just get right into it. I mean, Gen 8, HP's talking about the importance of automation in your assessment. Have they hit the mark? Yeah, this one is pretty spectacular. I mean, when I first started hearing about Gen 8, I was expecting the usual, we got the next generation Intel processors, we got, you know, maybe we've made some enhancements to the system more, yeah, faster, probably more power efficient, maybe we've got some better hardware management and fast stuff. But this is really, this is like a, this is like a wide frontal assault on all the things that I've been hearing for a decade as significant cost and operational pressures on the data center operators. So do you have this force to have a scenario around so-called next generation servers and does this fit into that mold? We don't have a formal scenario document, but yeah, this definitely fits into, you know, fits into what an intelligent vendor would be doing. Let's come up with one right here, real time. Well, the scenario is, you know, I think they approached it the right way and I have to sort of issue the disclosure. I was, for four years, I was director of blade system strategy at HP, so I know this from the inside. Yeah, okay. You know, you got to listen to your customers and what I'm seeing today are things that we were hearing, you know, when I was there from 2006 to 2010. And as an analyst, I've been hearing for a decade from customers of every vendor. So the pressures on cost operation, particularly OPEX, as CAPEX has become less of an issue, the pressures on OPEX and power efficiency have become extreme. So what they've done is they've answered, they've answered the requirements their customers are putting on them and that's kind of the core of what a smart long-term server strategy is you better answer your customers' problems or you're not going to do so well. And what they have done is applied some very appropriate technology solutions and are wrapped it up with some services that's going to be very hard for other people to duplicate. Yeah, so they're really following the money on this one to your point. It's not in the CAPEX, it's in the OPEX and that's really where this is aimed. But you made a point in the panel that I thought was right on and I want to have you talk about it a little bit which is the messaging that we're hearing is there's a lot in there on unplanned downtime and sure, a catastrophic event is going to be expensive but your point was that planned downtime is actually on an ongoing basis a lot more expensive. That's where most people are spending their money. Can you talk about that a little bit? Yeah, it's not as visible because it's not catastrophic. It's built into the budget, it's built into the schedule and the way you build it in is by having more resources and spending your precious OPEX dollars on managing downtime and maintenance and configuration changes in a non-disruptive way. And that's not cheap and it's not easy. So it's a hidden problem because it doesn't result in the company's sales portal going down or calls at two in the morning. But it's a huge budget item and a big operational issue and it's those things in combination that suck away the resources from being able, for example, to implement a new project for a brand new business requirement. So Richard, what are your clients telling you in terms of how they want to drive change in the data center? Well, most of my clients would be very happy to be in a position to actually drive change instead of reacting to external pressures just to be in the position to drive the change on a planned proactive way as a step forward for a lot of organizations.  So the other thing I want to talk about is the energy piece. Obviously there's a lot of the thrust of this announcement is aimed at the energy. Having said that, a lot of CIOs, and I think actually, I think Forrester had some data a couple of years ago that I saw that about, and I know the number's been ticking up so maybe you can update it, but I think at the time maybe 15% of the CIOs out there actually saw the power budget. Is that changed? I have not seen a good hard number on it. I think the number has gone up because I hear more of them are more aware of it. I'd be comfortable in saying that even if they don't get the bill in their budget, they're much more aware of it than it used to be, but there's still some structural problems in a lot of organizations. There's still a lot of companies where the person that pays the power bill doesn't have a direct connection to the IT operations. The facilities has always been sort of a separate walled off domain. So it's probably fair to say the situation's getting better, but it's certainly not perfect yet. So as a person who follows data centers quite closely, you'll appreciate this quote. A CIO said to me the other day, last month I was in New York at an event, and he said to me, my budget's not growing at 45% a year, but my data is, and I think it underscores the situation in a lot of data centers. On the other hand, you've got these cloud service providers that are growing like crazy and their budgets are growing like crazy. What do you see as the juxtaposition between the cloud service provider and the traditional data center? Is the traditional data center manager under pressure to perform like a cloud service provider? Absolutely, and the good news, bad news, good news is, bad news is he is under that pressure to perform like a cloud provider. The good news is that I think there's going to be definitely sort of a merging of the DNA over the next several years as companies like HP bring to the enterprise IT people some of the capabilities that the cloud providers have in terms of some of the economics, but absolutely the yardstick against which they're compared now is more and more the cloud provider, but I think a lot of that technology is going to be available to them. The ability to rapidly deploy servers, for example, that's a thing that a cloud provider has to do really well, but now you see with the Gen 8, there are opportunities for the enterprise IT people to get very efficient deployment of their servers. The operational monitoring and so on, those are becoming more and more accessible, but the pressure will remain and in terms of overall demand for servers, which is a little off your topic, but whether the application lives in a cloud or in your data center, it's still got to live somewhere and execute, so cloud is not going to reduce the demand for servers. If anything, it's going to increase it. Yeah, I know, that's an interesting topic and one that I used to be a number cruncher at IDC and I always noticed when prices dropped, demand went up, it was an elastic market and I would think of anything, it's going to increase it, but I want to follow up on the cloud service question is, what do you tell your customers or what are you seeing in your client base around chargebacks because they have to act like these cloud service providers, but only maybe 20% of them at most do chargebacks. Do they have to start doing that? The answer in the classical consultant fashion is it depends. It depends in an ideal world, we like to say, the definition of cloud includes elasticity, always on fine-grained chargeback. Now, my colleague, James Staten, and I go around and around on this in various fashions, but I don't think that perfect chargeback is always a requirement in a corporation as long as the economics of the solution are reflected somewhere realistically in the budget, it doesn't have to be a perfect chargeback. It can be an allocation, it can be a fixed fee, as long as in the end it's a realistic reflection of the resources. It doesn't have to be a perfect per CPU-minute chargeback. However, you're right, most people don't do it, it's a challenge and designing the right kind of chargeback is a challenge, but I'm not, if we were a lawyer, we would be saying strict constructionalist. You know, I'm not a strict constructionalist on chargeback. I think as long as it makes business sense and it makes the resource consumption visible to the financial management system, it doesn't have to be a perfect chargeback system. Yeah, so a cloud service provider has to obviously run IT like a business because their IT is a business, you're saying an internal data center manager has to be business-like and very efficient like a cloud service provider, but doesn't necessarily have to have all the metrics in place and all the systems in place to thrive. Exactly, because remember the chargeback itself and the process of administering it cost money. And this has always been, historically, there's always been this balance between fine-grain metrics and what it costs to implement the fine-grain metrics. You know, and this has been a juggling act since practically since the first day I got a paycheck in the computer industry, that fundamental problem hasn't changed. If you make the metrics sufficiently granular and sufficiently granular and fine intervals and a very tight financial control system, you can end up spending more money on the fine-grain metrics than they will save you in internal costs. Yeah, and you could end up getting shot by people in your organization, too. All right, my last question is on a couple of dimensions, on a scale of one to 10, how relevant do you see this announcement? Oh, I'd say about 9.321. 9.321, so pretty relevant. Yes, a very, seriously, a scale of one to 10, you know, nine, because nobody wants to give it a 10 and anything less is probably less than it should get. This is a very significant announcement. It's a big deal because of the breadth of integrates, the breadth, the number of places they've touched the fundamental problem of data center operating expenses is what really impresses me. Each point technology in its own is interesting. There are cases, you know, other people have some technologies and products that address some of these points, but there's nothing I've seen that addresses the whole breadth of them the way they did, and I really think they did do this from a very user-centric perspective. So yeah, the scientific analysis in the end is this is a big deal. Good. All right, Richard, well thanks very much for coming inside theCUBE and sharing your perspectives. You bring a great independent view. Forrester continues to do a good job, so thank you very much for the great work that you're doing in the community, and would love to have you back sometime. Well, thank you. It's an honor and the analyst fraternity to be in theCUBE. Oh, well, as I say, you're welcome back anytime. Thank you. All right, take care. All right, everybody, we are going to be right back after a quick reset. This is Dave Vellante. We're live from Las Vegas, HP's Gen 8 announcement, and keep it right.


We are coming to England to do a one-day workshop. Yes. We managed to be able to do that, you know, in between all of our stays in Ireland. We're going to fly down from Ireland to London for this one-day event, which is going to be on the 23rd of February. Our workshop will start at 10 a.m. in the morning and finish at 5 p.m., so it will be a whole day workshop to spend time with David and I. It's called Teach Only Love. It's going to be on Saturday, February 23rd. It's going to be at Loudwater Farm, Loudwater Lane. Yes. So it's a little bit out through the row areas outside, a little bit to the west of London. We're going to be talking about our lives, how we lived, the principles of the Course in Miracles. When we say Teach Only Love, it's obviously about a transformation of your thoughts, because we're teaching all the time by our thoughts. It's more than just teaching with words or teaching in action. It's really a transformation of consciousness, and that's what this workshop's going to be about, with lots of examples from our own life and how we put it into practice and live it on a daily life. We have a very happy, joyful life. We're actually inviting you from Hawaii. We see the water in the background, and we have a very adventurous life. That's been a life of no compromising, just following the Holy Spirit every single moment, and it turned out to be very joyous and joyful and very, very spontaneous. It's at a level of form, but actually in the mind, every moment is an opportunity to forgive and to teach us who we are in every moment. So we would just be thrilled to be able to have this opportunity to actually share with you what we have been through and how we live our life every moment. It's really a living experience. Sometimes people say we're living examples of the teachings of the Course in Miracles, because we have spent our life practicing and emptying our mind, working forgiveness with all kinds of thoughts and beliefs that are in our mind and emptying out so thoroughly that we have a very still mind, and we just radiate and extend that mind, and we're just inviting you to come along and join with us in that.  This is kind of in some ways like a farewell tour, because I've been doing it for many years and Francis has joined me recently, but actually for me the silence is calling deeper and deeper, so this is still a time for me of public gatherings and like I've been doing for the last 20 years, doing workshops, retreats, sometimes they're all day, sometimes they're a talk for a few hours, sometimes they're four to six weeks long, so it's beautiful. But actually we've let go of the self-concept that the ego made for us, and now we're just living in divine providence and flowing in the spirit. And it's fun to come together with everybody because we're all the same spirit, but we have to go through really a letting go process, it seems, or really an integrating in to the whole is really what it's about, and we just always have lots of fun examples of how that's happened in our own life, even though it's happened different for us individually, there's a lot of common elements that everyone seems to go through. Right, and I'd love to be able to share my experience, but also David and I just want to answer your questions, you know, whatever these questions are, just bring your deepest questions and then we can explore them together. So it will be a very profound experience together. Yeah, how to live each one we love. So we have some details. Yes, so actually there will be a early prize of 75 pounds if you book before January 31st, which will be, you know, this month, end of this month. And to book, you can either go online, miracle.org.uk, go to events page, and click the book now button there, or you can call 08, I guess the counter code is double four, and then you can call 0844-567-0209 to make the booking, or write to email to admin at miracle.org.uk to make the booking. If you just want to ask questions, you can go if there's an inquiries number as well and an email address. Right, the inquiries number again, counter code is plus four four, and the number is 020-7262-0209, or you can email info at miracle.org.uk. So we really look forward to seeing you there. It's part of a European tour for us. We're going to Ireland, England. We're going to be also going down to Devon later on in the tour, going down to Belgium, Royal Belgium, Royal Sweden. We're going to Prague for a couple nights to speak in Prague for the first time that we've ever done that. So it's going to be kind of a fun tour for us and we really hope you can enjoy this one day workshop that we're putting on in England. Yes, we'll see you there. You there. Bye.