Thanks. Just wanted to specifically to Brenton and Jim, the execution of your business, and how have you identified what consumers want in your market? How have you sort of found out what your target market wants? If you go first, Brenton. So our business, David, is we're a bulk processor market. But I guess for us, it's all about hitting that product consistency and sticking with the market. So markets go up and down as far as returns go. But I think in the past, Australia's been highly criticized for jumping in and out of markets. So just having that dedication to that market and making sure every container is the same as the one that's just been delivered. So product quality is really important for us. And that's our difference, probably on a global stage, is that we challenge ourselves to put almonds in its various product forms to the highest specifications. And we get a little bit more money for that. But it is just becoming that supplier of choice. So we just keep funding up and listen to the customer and a bit like Jim, I think it's really important that you understand who your customer is and what they use the product for. And you can generally come up with some really good solutions on maybe saving them some money or using a different type of almond product or a variety of almond or size of almond. So our business, we deal directly with the customer. We don't sell through any trading house. It's all a direct relationship with the customer. Jim? Yeah, people know more about food than ever. So if you give them something that, in the case of corn, if you give them something that tastes poorly, you just don't get the return sales. And when we go overseas, a lot of the corn that's grown is grown in different climates and it's generally quite different to what we have. So unless, and it looks pretty much the same, but unless you have a point of difference that tastes better, then it doesn't mean much. So labelling is very important and obviously you've got to tell them that the difference is in the taste. So they're the most important things. Some questions? Thanks, David. Stephen, thanks for your question. I guess a question for both Jim and Nicola. Touched on a couple of things and I want to relate back to this morning's conversation about investments. Jim, you talked about two things. You go up north and presume on a relative basis your land and water is somewhat cheap up there by current standards, but you mentioned the labour problem. Nicola, I think in intensification, we're seeing some already here in blueberries and raspberries, for instance. And the other thing in your intensive area, I'm sure if you touched on, you may correct me, is we're seeing here a lot more in US and Europe is robotics, which partly tackles the labour issue. So it's a kind of combined question that Jim, do you see your corn ever going completely intensive into your hydroponics business? And where does robotics fit in, obviously, Nicola, the process? But I think if you've been in couples all the way, the challenge we have is the investment as we see it saving our tomato people, if you take, say, Costas or one of the other groups that have got $60, $80 million in hodas with some robotics. They are big investments and our horticultural promotion CEO was just in the US and he was talking about major global companies like Monsanto are investing in those areas. So how do we capture the investment from a smorning the investment model to go in intensive and where do robotics and labour fit into making that into a package leading on from where you both are now? Sure, nice. I can just touch on a little, but I'm not a great one on knowing everything about what's happening in the robotics, but I do know that they are already designing blue... Well, they are actually trying to breed blueberry bushes for mechanical harvesting and the better tasting, bigger size. Interesting enough, one of the top breeders worldwide is actually here in Australia, but he sees the future in outdoor, but it's compromising because I see the future in intensive undercover, but it's getting those machines to the size to get into the structures to be able to do the harvesting properly. But you look at how tractors used to be and I'm not sure if you've all got those little John Deere lawn mowers. You can get different sizes of tractors and that will happen with the machinery, I think, in the berry industry for harvesting berries indoors, especially blueberries, because they're a little bit more hardy. It's a hard one, because there's a variety of raspberry that are actually already harvested mechanically, but that's only for processing. So the machinery needs to be really a little bit more delicate and I personally don't think for the raspberries and the blackberries, blackberries probably a little bit quicker because they're a little bit more hardy than raspberries, but I don't see the soft, soft fruit taking on the mechanical harvesting for the fresh market just yet, but I think the blueberries will be in the next 5, 10 years, there will be something come through for intensive cropping. To go towards your tomato picking and stuff like that, I'll probably not qualify to be able to tell you what's actually happening and that's fair, but I can see it happening. Yeah, it's simple for me. The labour thing is not going to go away. I just came back from Berlin to look at the world's best standards of robotics. For me, they're a ways off. We don't have a choice. I don't think the industry has a choice, but to look at those sorts of things, but they are a way off. You're asking me why I focus my business on outside of developing my product. It's got to be trying to save on labour, look at better ways, more efficient ways of mechanising everything. So it's not going away and we don't really have a choice. So I look for best industry standards, world standards if I can. For me, they're still in their infancy. For me, I felt that I spoke to the people that are at the highest point of robotics for what I do and they're still not there yet. So I'll be there. I'll be the first one knocking on their door when they get it right, trust me. Michael Clark, agribonomist and animative leader. You had an issue with pollination in 2016. Armour crops going to be a bit down. Can you elaborate on that, sir? It's just... I can't say it's poor bees. But no, it was just timing, just weather, essentially.  So bee pollination happens around that August, September time and we need generally good weather for bees to get out there and strut their stuff and it was just cold and had some sherry weather activity and the bees, like most of us, will stay indoors and not go out and pollinate as good as what they can. So, as I said, the game-changing on a nursery point of view is that bees will become less reliant as the industry goes through its next level of expansion because it's self-fertile, for which are now available to growers. Yeah, absolutely, yep. So there's been reasonable plantings in Australia really last year and this year in the planting period, and it's certainly stimming an uptake in California, which changes the whole harvest. Most people may not know, there's about 16 or 18 different varieties, 17 of those are pollinating varieties. So almonds are harvested by individual variety. So if you had one variety, not only is it better, it's a little bit cheaper because you've got reduced pollination costs, but on a harvesting point of view, it's going to minimise cost a fair bit. Seedless? Yeah, look, and now all the myths that have been broken in California over the last probably five or six years. So there's orchards there that have got signs up, that have got no bees allowed. Now, that's how confident they are that pollination is not required on those varieties. But again, and we're going through that same dilemma in Australian hours is do you really need, bees really need to still pollinate something? So we'll wait to see. So I've been planted at the moment, so we'll see how that turns out. It's been positive for the US. Shane, I'd like to hear something else, if you're up. In the last decade, we've seen this question for bred and exponential growth in the nut industries, particularly almonds. Is there a prime hollow effect that's, you know, prices at the moment stack or we've got significant international players now moving into the almond industry, particularly in the riverine? What's the industry's potential? How big can you go? I think it's all going to come down to water and suitable land, soil types. So it certainly will be a reasonable increase in hectares planted in 2016, 17, 18, because there's reasonable nursery orders over that period. But it'll be similar to a pattern from almonds are hot at the moment and, you know, five years' time or six years' time that may not be as hot. So it'll be going through that cycle of planting now and taking a bit of a pause later. But water's going to be the crucial factor. Almonds do deliver a good return on your water use and one of the highest ones. And I think farming's changed from that land use. I think he's on to it. We don't need soil the way we utilise it now to grow crops, but water is still such a crucial input and people need to get a return on that investment if they're going to make it. It's Anthony Kachango from Water Innovation. I've got a question for Brian. The non-edible sector represents about 20% of the grass value of production. And I'm just wondering if you can provide some perspective for neighbours in terms of any trends or opportunities in that sector. And I do have a second question for Nicky, if I may. They would get two for the price of one. I'm just wondering, from your travels with the Nuffin Scholarship, what were two or three key things that you took and brought back to your business that you plan to implement in the short or near future? So you get the answer. I'm sorry, I didn't quite catch what you said. The what sector represents... Sure, the non-edible sector, so turf, nursery and so on, represents about 20% of farm-gate value. Right. So I'm just wondering on behalf of neighbours, if there's any perspective you might be able to add in terms of trends or opportunities in that sector. No, unfortunately, I mean, we concentrate on fruit and vegetables and nuts and we don't look very much at that other sector. You know, it's been declining over a period of time and we've sort of continued the trend down in our calculations, but it's not something we study in any detail. I mean, I understand that it sort of declining, well, partly because of changes in housing because there's more people living in apartments and they don't go to the nursery and buy plants the way people with backyards do, but it's not something we study. Okay, you asked me what we changed directly in our own business. The first thing I can tell you about that was really, we started to diversify. So generally most farmers tend to be monocultural, so we had just blueberries in the one greenhouse. When as soon as we came back, we actually were planting raspberries, strawberries. We started integrating with citrus, passion fruit, figs, all around the outsides of our greenhouse were inside, but on the outskirts, to give our bees a little bit more diversity to increase their bee health. We grow in a greenhouse and the first thing we taught, put your beehives facing the east, which was just simple stuff that we didn't know about. And the other thing was just putting up landscapes because the UV is affecting the radar of the bees.  We don't have that happening anymore. Probably the biggest thing, which keeps me awake a little bit at night is the spotted winged distrofila. That was a huge thing that was affecting the rest of the world and the berry industry. If we get that on our shores, we're in some really big trouble. So, and the other thing was market access. It was another thing that keeps me up at night. These beautiful trade agreements that we can get, but it can actually change and the other thing and other countries can get great access to our markets. So the growers here need to really be, be really thinking ahead, like the Chileans and their berry production is so incredibly sleek. If they get access to our markets, a lot of the berry industry in Australia will be under a bit of pressure. So we came back and we've diverse our business. So we're trying other things like turmeric, garlic, ginger, things that we can produce and supply. We are small grower and small growers will only be able to survive if we have a diverse range that we can offer customers in our local area or do the markets. The big growers will be the ones that's doing the supermarkets, that's what I think. So that's where I feel, and I keep giving advice to small growers saying, if you want to do something, diversify your portfolio, find something new. Nicky, John, honest of the map, I'm a pair of Australia. I'm just wondering in your travels, whether you saw any sizeable glass houses that today might, or a few years down the track, might enable even the orchards to come into a glass house environment. There are obviously savings in pest management, water usage. We're already spending $100,000 a hectare in risk mitigation. Are we 10 years away from potentially being able to grow out of some pears and avocados in door? I do think, I honestly, for hand on heart, I think it's happening and it's gonna happen quite quickly. I'm sure the first stage will be putting things under just plastic tunnels. I believe, and I saw it on Twitter or something today, that there's some cherries going into glass or under greenhouse in Tasmania. So that's the first step. And when the cherries do it, and it's gonna start with the high value products first. Avocados, cherries, figs, mangoes. But then it's a matter of time of people finding a special peach or plum, the queen garnet or something has got some great properties. Those are the things that are really precious that people will be able to do the sums and see the big glass houses going in. In terms of greenhouses, I've seen them really big. As we see here already, there's 10 hectares, 20 hectares being put in one blocks. Talk about tall greenhouses, saw the tallest greenhouse in the world. So if you think you're limited just to mangoes, which you can actually trail us down, I think we're wrong. You could probably put a few almonds in as well, and you can get some height. So I do see that being the way forward. And the thing is, is that you don't need lots of land to get the same sort of yields. And I know, a lot of people don't wanna hear that, especially, but I think that land will be more precious used for things that it needs to be used for. Some of our high value crops can be put under cover and glass and retractables so that you can actually, the retractable greenhouses to me have got a great thing, because you actually get sunlight in. It actually, you know, fix the half life of some of the fungal spores.  So I hope that answers your question. Just on that, we had an inquiry recently of someone who wanted the information of growing avocado seed in the process. Yeah. Last call for questions. Is more in line with potentially ramping up exports in the fruit side of things with veggies also, of course. Do you see what kind of opportunities are there to do that and to do it fairly quickly? And particularly from this morning's panel sessions, et cetera, where investing from superannuation are likely to come along possibly, if it does. Give us a question. Who's it to? I don't know. So who was it to, Stuart? Doesn't know. Doesn't know. It's a panel. I think each of you probably have a difference. Well, what I said during my speech was, and Barnaby Joyce said earlier today, we are high-cost producers. So now's the time, you know, the Australian dollar may stay low for a long time, but we've got to get in there and consolidate on the market. That's the way I see it. So at the moment from my company, I'm trying to be very strategic about where I'm going, try to get into the market now. If the currency changes, then try and get a foot in there. You want to answer the one on, might be more your bag being in almonds? Super. I think there's, yeah. I'm not sure how that's all going to play out. Really, this still seems to be our reluctance from a particular super area to invest in agriculture. I think those questions were covered pretty well this morning about the fact there's less than 1% invested in there currently. Certainly, we're getting a lot more overseas super funds or superannuation funds investing in the particular arm industry, that's for sure. There's been a number of acquisitions over the last two years in that area. I thought, export such a, you can have a really good export market, but it can be, you can change overnight on a simple label requirement in that country or there's always hurdles that you've got to overcome. The fact that we're a fairly large exporter and I think the whole fee structure that's just been changed over the last six or nine months might make it easier for, more incentive to provide assistance to a smaller exporter, but the big exporters are getting higher fees and charges for export documentation or certificates or the whole process. So I always get a little bit confused, Stuart, when the government says one thing and as an exporter or a processor, you're getting smacked with all these different costs that weren't there two years ago. So we're talking about robotics and innovation, but there's no incentive for business, either do it yourself, which you probably should be doing anyway, but all grant money is all about employing somebody. But to be efficient, you need to be investing in other things and people. Simple as that. Can I just add in there, this is just from my perspective as well, is that sometime with the investment and the superannuation funds, they want guaranteed returns and sometimes agriculture's previously been quite, historically been quite risky. And that's why I go back to my protected cropping. We starting to, in these beautiful big closed or semi-closed greenhouses, your risks are mitigated to quite extensively unless you get a health storm. But that sort of thing I think would be attractive and the scale that they're talking and the volumes of return on investment, you look at these big projects going up 10, 20 hectares at a time. I can tell you this now, there's no one investing in that type of money if they do not know that their return is positive. So whether it's competitive with a super shopping centers or with age care, I don't know, but I think at the end of the day, investors are gonna take us seriously because we're gonna need to be fed. And if they want to have a slice of the pie, they need to put their money with their mouth. So thank you and we'll wrap up there. And Brian, you've laid out the roadmap for us, close to double digit growth, that's pretty good. And the other three growers have clearly targeted the right market and done the right deals. They're obviously adaptive and responsive to market changes and they focus on their margins. So with that, I'd like us all to take our panel appropriately.


My beloved brothers and sisters, Insha'Allah, I'm going to be speaking about the third shubha, the third doubts, the enemies of al-Islam, the orientalists, the missionaries, the non-Muslims in general have bought regarding the preservation of the Quran, the preservation of the Quran. In this episode, I want to speak about the doubt in which they have said, or the doubt that they brought forward saying that the Quran or the Qiraat, there is contradiction in it. There is contradiction between some of the Qiraat. They are saying that these two Qiraat are polar opposites. They cannot be reconciled. There's no way to bring them together. There is no possible way to reconcile between these two meanings. That's their argument. We Muslims, we believe there is variation and differences in the Qiraat and the meanings are different. Muslims are not denying it, but what they're saying is there's no contradiction. Maybe one verse is given an extra meaning to what this verse isn't, but to say they're contradicting each other, that one is affirming something and the other one is negating it. There is nothing like that in the Qiraat. So they said, yes, there is. Let us give you an example. An example they gave is They said, this Qiraat that you just read of the Rahman is a recitation, a Qiraat which is Mutawater, mass transmission, the seven Quraat already like that. But they said there's another Qiraat, read by Ali and other companions, which says And the two Qiraat that we have, are contradicting one another. How are they contradicting one another? They're contradicting one another. The first Qiraat, which you've recited, says The Romans, the Basantin Empire has been defeated. In the nearest land, and after they defeat the Roman or the Basantin Empire will then defeat its enemy. That's what you recited. That's your recitation, Abdulrahman, that you recited, which is the Qiraat of the Quraat of the seven Quraat. But the Qiraat that we also have from Ali and other noble companions says The Roman or the Basantin Empire defeated its enemy And in the nearest land, they will surely be defeated. Opposite to what you just said. In the first verse, it's suggesting that the Romans will be defeated and then the Romans will then defeat. The one we gave you, or the Qiraat that we're telling you now, it's saying that the Romans, they defeated. And after a period of time, the Romans will then be defeated. Or the Basantin Empire will be defeated. The Romans are an empire that existed at the time of the Prophet, A.S. Their main capital was in Constantinople, modern-day Istanbul, Turkey. That was the capital for them. Islam destroyed and annihilated the empire. And as you can see today, Turkey is a Muslim country. What's the response to this? What is the response to this Shubha? The response is in the following way. Arraddo min wujoo. Number one, the Qiraat that we recited, which is This is the Qiraat which is It's an accepted recitation. As for the recitation that they brought forward is a recitation which is Because it's a recitation which is It's a recitation which is So there can't be a contradiction between a Qiraat Or there should not be a contention There should not be a conflict between a Qiraat which is A Qiraat which is accepted and one that's rejected. That's the first response. The second response is we are able to reconcile between the two. There isn't actually even a conflict in terms of meaning. There is not. The first Qiraat, of course, the one we recited Ghulibat-e-Rub and then Sayyag-e-Libul This Qiraat, of course, it's talking about The Romans will win and defeat the Persians In a short period of time, okay In a very short period of time Ghulibat-e-Rub, the Romans will be defeated before And now the Romans will then defeat the Persians Empire in a short period of time That's what the first recitation says And that's what happened Also, the time that the Romans beat the Persians Correlated to the time that the Muslims beat the Kufar-e-Quraish And as you know, the Romans, they were Christians So they were holding onto a book And the Persians were Zoroastrians They didn't have a scripture or a book The Muslims, on the other hand, have a religion From Allah Azza wa Jalla Which is Haq and there's no other religion which is Haq other than Islam Whereas Kufar-e-Quraish had no scripture They were not holding onto a scripture They were idol worshippers So it resembled one another from that perspective That's what the first Qiraat is talking about The second Qiraat is talking about when it says Ghulibat-e-Rub and then Sayyag-e-Libul Is referring to that the Romans Ghulibat-e-Rum here means the Romans beat Saud-e-Sham The people of Sham The people of Lavant Which historically happened And it was then given the believers Sayyag-e-Libul and the Romans will then be defeated It was telling the believers that you guys are going to beat the Romans And you guys are going to defeat the Romans And if you look at the Islamic history In the 19th century From the Hijrah The 9th year of the Hijrah The companions, may Allah be pleased with them They defeated some of the Romans Took some of their lands from them So there are two recitations we were able to reconcile Between it And the second answer that we also gave is that One Qiraat is Shad And the other Qiraat is Mutawater One Qiraat is accepted And another recitation is rejected And the scholars They mentioned that the differences in the Quran are two types Okay The scholars mentioned The scholars they mentioned That the differences are two types That are generally found The scholars they speak about it Ibn Qutayb mentions it in his works That the The differences are two types The differences are two types The differences are two types There are variations But there are ways to bring them together They complement one another The Quran's differences are The differences are two types The Quran does not have in it The Qiraat is not Which is recitations That cannot be brought together That contradict one another It's not Shaykh al-Islam ibn Teyma He said There is no difference amongst the scholars There is no difference amongst the Muslims And the seven dialects And seven modes of recitation Which the Quran was sent down on It doesn't have any contradiction in meaning And those recitations do not contradict one another Sometimes the wordings are actually the same Like They're the same And sometimes there may be slight differences In the meaning But they are close in meaning Both meanings are very close Both meanings are very close You're not going to find In the Qiraat of the Quran They don't contradict one another Because they are from Allah If the Quran was to come from other Then it would have contained in it And it would have had in it Contradiction So Alhamdulillah in this episode We have destroyed the doubt and shubha Which they brought forward saying That there is tanakuf Anything which I have said That was wrong but incorrect is from me And Shaytan and Allah and his messenger Are both free from it I'll see you guys in the next episode May Allah be with you for listening And may Allah be with you Assalamu alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu How can you do a two second action Right now that will give you a share of the reward Of everything we're doing on this YouTube channel Simple Like this video and click subscribe Why? It will allow YouTube to recommend our videos To other users And imagine the huge amount of reward That could be waiting for you On the day of judgement if you did that With a sincere intention of spreading the deen of Allah You'll be rewarded for every single person Who benefits from one of our videos As a result of your like or subscribe That's an easy two second action That you definitely don't want to miss out on Do it now, click like and subscribe And don't forget to make that intention


What have you done to this young man? What have you done to him? Oh Jesus Christ! You said what? I am Satan. What have you done to this in his life? I've ruined his mind. What have you done to him? Oppressions, how do you oppress? Leave him alone! You could have the rest. Leave him alone! What have you done? I've destroyed his life. So this young man to his family? I've destroyed his life. I've destroyed his life.  You have no place in his body. You are living him now. You said for how long have you been living him? Living him now. Oh Jesus Christ! All over your body, who is on fire? No! Every part of your body. You have no place in his body. No! No! You demon! He is powerless. In the name of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ. See the downfall of Satan. Amen. Come on. Isn't our God good? So what we just watched, we just watched a video of a deliverance from the race to deliver conference five months ago where God delivered a man from demons and torture and bondage and we got to see freedom revealed. So let's go ahead and welcome him back up. Come on. Hi there. We welcome you. Can you share what's your name and where you're from? My name is Dimitri Rosik and I'm from Hawaii. Welcome back. Come on. Can you share with us, you came to the race to deliver conference with John Chi. Can you share what God did in your life then? What was your life like prior to your deliverance and how were you living? Well my life before was drugs, alcohol, opiates, hard drugs, a lot of jail time in and out just years and years of back and forth. It was just real negative. My mind wasn't there. I thought the goal in life was to succeed and it was all me, me, me. Okay. And what caused you to want to come to the race to deliver conference? There was one Christmas last Christmas where I went to sleep and my mom was actually reading the Bible to me when I was passed out and she told me that I had said stop reading that to him and she realized that something was up so she kept reading the Bible to me and basically I just manifested and I came to myself and I was being held by four people from the church and I was yelling, I'm Satan. Okay. And that's what we just, that's what we also saw in the video. So you discovered that your issues weren't just problems you're struggling with, that there was an actual demonic spirit, a stronghold behind that. Yeah, yeah. And how was your process with the deliverance and how's your life been ever since the deliverance? Oh, the process was, you know, I came here to race to deliver and I was standing in line and the closer John she got to me, the more restless my body got. I couldn't explain it. It's like every negative thought you could have, there was no positivity. It just anger flared, fear just couldn't control it. You know, and once he came up and I was delivered, there was this presence of God and it was amazing. I mean, I've never felt in my whole life I was confused. I was living. Come on. That's the power of the presence of God. It's able to reveal every power of saying and expel the power of saying, amen. So now that you've received your deliverance, it's been five months. What's your life been like now? Oh, it's amazing. You know, I wake up. I have a personal relationship with Jesus and it's, you know, you can't explain it.  He always gives me peace. If there's a problem, I don't turn to stress or closing myself up. I just pray. I talk to the Holy Spirit and he tells me everything's going to be okay and everything just adds up.  Let's put our hands together for Jesus. Amen. Come on. So now that you have received your freedom and your deliverance and God has transformed your life, what would be your advice to people here that are maybe struggling with drugs or alcohol or depression or not sleeping or career issues? And they've come here and I know you went through a process of deliverance. What was your device to keep your faith and just to believe for? You know, my advice would be if you come here and you're looking for something, just let put your heart out there.  Come on. Let's put our hands together. Thank you so much. Thank you for watching this content. I hope this was a blessing to you. If you're like me and you like to click on things, click on this, subscribe to our channel and the content will come to you every time we post it. And remember, the best is yet to come.


Hello friends, so in this question It's given that a v is parallel to cd. So these two lines are parallel E f is perpendicular to cd. So this angle is 90 degrees and g e d is 126 degrees. So this is 126 degrees You have to find out a g e. So you have to find out a g e. Let me put it as x Then g e f. Let me put it as y and f g e So let me put it as Z. Okay, I have to find out x z and y Okay, now clearly You can see the solution. Yeah, so solution is x is equal to 126 degrees Why because x is equal to angle g e d g e d y because they are alternate Alternate interior angles Right, so clearly x is equal to 126 degrees. There is no big thing here. Okay, so a g e is equal to 126 degrees right now g e f or you can actually write it as a G e is 126 degrees now clearly you can find z Z is nothing but or rather if you see x plus z is 180 degrees Why and the reason is a linear pair Linear pair Okay, so what is that then that which is also equal to what was that there was equal to angle f g e actually and This is nothing but 180 degrees minus x So 180 degrees minus 126 Degrees so hence it is coming out to be 54 degrees Is it so Fg is 54 degrees clear now you have to find out why Why right so if you see? Angle g e d look at g e d. What do you see so g e d is nothing but y plus 90 degrees is it it why this is why And this is 90 so y plus 90 is full-angle g e d. Okay, so And g e d is given to be 126 degrees isn't it 126 degrees so g e d 126 degrees is equal to y Plus 90 degrees so my friend Y is equal to 126 degrees Minus 90 degrees it is equal to 36 degrees Very easy some is that so hence what is the learning out of this some so you must know again all the Angles related to transversal then linear pair and Vertically opposite angles if you know this all the lines and angle sums you'll be able to solve Please keep this in mind And you'll be able to solve any such sum


If you can't be here, don't mind me, I just got done working out, I also sweat down, did a 20-minute circuit training. We'll get to that someday. Listen, I just want to show you guys and girls the clean today. It's a good exercise. It helps you get to the rack position. And once you get into the rack position, you can just about do anything. You do your cleans, you know, it's a lot of pulls, you know, it's just a good position to get to. Now, mainly when you want to do the clean, I'm going to show you without any kettlebells at first. When you want to do the clean, you want to get your hips back. Just kick your hips out. Come down a little bit of a squat position. Have your thumb facing backwards and the top of your hand facing out. You don't want to be like this, like this, like this. You want to be like this. From this position, you explode from the hips. Don't use your back. If you start getting back problems, then you're doing it wrong. Explode from your hips and kick out. When you get to this position, this is the rack position. Once you're in this position, your hand should be straight. Elbow tucked into your side. I don't want to see people with their elbows out, like this, and a hand like this, you're going to get hurt. From this position, you explode from the hips. You come right up, just like that. That's the rack. The clean. For here, you can do presses. It's really great. Let me show you with the kettlebell now. I got a 12K here. Some people, they like to keep their arms out like this and tighten up their core and everything. It's another plus. Everything's a plus in it. From this position, you're just going to explode from the hips. Now you're in the rack position. Again, from here up.  It should slap into your shoulder here. Not hard. You don't want to bang into your wrist. If it hits your wrist, you've got a weak wrist. You've got to really work on that. From here, just come up, clean. Elbows in, pointing down to the ground, wrist is straight. I don't want to see this stuff. If you start doing this, you're going to have a problem. You want to keep everything in tight. Even from here, arms tight into the chest, explode from the hips.  Get back to me. Let me know how you make out. Have a good day.