What's going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overload here So this would be the spoiler-free review for tie tie West's pearl Which you know is the prequel to X that came out earlier this year now It again is directed by tie West written by tie West also written by Mia goth and it stars Mia goth David David corn sweat Tandy Wright Matthew Sutherland Emma Jenkins Purol now this film is set in 1918 during the era of the Spanish flu and World War one and we know the film again is exploring the urges of the origins of pearl who is the main villain from X We know the character we met with her elderly husband Howard now again the events are taking place prior to this film and Trapped on her family's isolated farm pearl must tend to her ailing father under the bitter and overbearing watch of her devout mother Lusting for a glamorous life like she's seen in the movies pearl finds her ambitions temptations and repressions all colliding in this stunning Technicolor inspired origin story of X's iconic villain Now this is a very deranged film. I'll say that and I did like the movie And even for those that end up not liking it I don't think there is going to be any denying that this is a well-crafted film that definitely plays out like a sick Reimagining of the Wizard of Oz Mia goth. I cannot say it enough She is a phenomenal actress that completely loses herself in this deep character study on the character of pearl and from what? We've gathered in X and now pearl this character is always wanted to be a star Escape her traditional role and live out her own dreams instead of watching Everyone around her live out theirs while she's also having some of her desires be repressed Like we kind of we're getting hinted at with X and those events that played out there So the stuff we learned about her and her husband Howard more specifically that we first met back in X as well That definitely makes his character a lot more tragic the most fascinating aspect of this film was how it always kept you engaged Or just intrigued by pearl as a character because admittedly everyone else around her is a pretty bare bones Like forgettable character, but pearl is always a captivating force and of course a lot of that is due to me It goes acting so I guess in that regard. I'll say the movie definitely lives up to its title because pearl is a scene stealer Speaking of which there's a moment in the movie where she delivers a top contender For monologue of the year I'd say Mia got that being her eyes are pretty teary-eyed for a lot of this and her mouth Is filling with saliva from her sorrow and her delivery is so impeccable that you just can't help but be engaged the whole time It's like a six-minute monologue and I'm like wow She is just devouring this whole sequence It's a moment of confession where pearl realizes that her loved ones were correct when they told her to be content with what she had But now she has to live with that regret forever again Like how we see play out in X and how she was trying to warn the character of Maxine how she's gonna be just like her Again this dialogue this monologue moment It's a very thought-provoking moment that just highlights how deranged this woman is and how she's allowed herself to become How deranged she's allowed herself to become because she's allowed her desires and dreams to just simply corrupt her if Anything this movie shows that jealousy is definitely dangerous is a dangerous thing after all as for the aesthetic I cannot praise it enough the visuals are so rich and vibrant that early on it gives off a false sense of hope for Anyone going into the movie blindly, but then it takes a dark turn about five minutes later The aesthetic is so welcoming But then the narrative becomes progressively more twisted and unnerving that I couldn't help but just be so in awe by it all That contrast was definitely just something that was working and just kept kept being something that was very compelling about the movie One thing about 824 is that they are going to give you a memorable dinner dinner table scene And when I say that Pearl delivers that in more ways than one There's a sequence where Pearl's mother is trying to come for the Tony She's trying to come for Tony Colette's neck with her energy. That's what I was getting now mind you during this There's also thunder and lightning chiming in to add a lot of attention to the sequence It's a rewarding boiling point because Pearl and her mother are not seen eye-to-eye for the bulk of this movie The movie has wonderful pacing and never wasting out of his runtime I sincerely felt as though everything on screen was necessary Scenes that are there to get under your skin are allowed to breathe scenes that are intended to make you feel as uncomfortable as The character on screen are there in the situation are handled well And if you're afraid that this movie doesn't have enough gore don't worry because it has more than enough There's even a writing object that at this point I'm just like this is a representation of how sinister things are slowly getting in this farmhouse The costume designs are another put another plus or out pearl I really just dug all the knots to the Wizard of Oz the old-fashioned films in general all the way down to the amazing score That's featured in the movie I'll also have to add pearl on the top 10 list for best editing of the year Every performance was impressive even down to a person who didn't even have a single line of dialogue for my memory Their facial expressions will be enough to evoke sympathy out of you and feel for them due to the crazed character That's targeting them in pearl while I might prefer X as far as replay value anytime. I turn this on I'll know I'm in for a treat as well It's basically just different in its presentation because it's a character study But it retains all the qualities that made X so effective And I think that was gonna make this movie get over with a lot of people even if you come out of it thinking Hey, you know, I prefer X. This is a well shot movie. It's beautiful to look at me A goth again is a force to be reckoned with Ty West I cannot wait to see how you close this out with Maxine of a lot of this movie Just adds some context to a lot of the events now when you go back and watch X after and it will just make it all the more Rewarding when we have this trilogy to kind of watch in chronological order because now when it's all complete I definitely will watch Pearl first then X then Maxine because So far and the year just started but somehow Ty West he's gonna go out of this decade or This year even to with the best trilogy known to mankind for the decade anyway This is a great trilogy this movie of Pearl. I think I definitely do prefer The character study aspect of this over some of the narrative of X But but the presentation in the narrative of X is still something I think for me will have a lot more Replay value and something I will want to revisit a lot more Still all in all I have no real complaints with Pearl outside of again the characters outside of Pearl We're very one note one dimensional and That's really it Maybe some other maybe some other hiccups that of course will notice over several rewatches but I'm gonna give this movie a 8 out of 10 and If you guys have seen Pearl or if you haven't let me know what you guys think about this review Let me know what you guys think about Pearl if you've seen it already down in the comment section below and Are you excited for Maxine? Do you have any high hopes for Maxine? What do you prefer so far out of the two? Do you prefer X? Do you prefer Pearl? And it was nice to see that alligator again or that crocodile wherever it was Let me know about that all down in the comment section below if you have an array of course Make sure you subscribe turn on post of the case check never miss a video in the description I'll have links to all my social media accounts on my Facebook Twitter and Instagram You can message me there of course to let me know if there are any movies news or reviews You let me to cover in the future and with all that in mind guys. I will see you in the next video


A building has been deemed a total loss after a structure fire in Wadena that happened a little before 9 yesterday morning at a building occupied by TJ's detailing the Jefferson bus lines office and a U-Haul business. When first responders arrived, they found the building engulfed in flames. Cars traveling on Highway 10 and 2nd Street were rerouted for a period of time to get first responders room to work. A press release from the Wadena Police Department reports no one was inside and only minor injuries were reported. The fires believed to have started from a malfunctioning propane heater. The building appears to be a complete loss. If you enjoyed this segment of Lakeland News, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to Lakeland PBS.


Okay, solve this question. How many of you have done this already? Look at the summation of all of them. Okay, great, great. So only 18 people have given correct answer over here. So I would like to discuss this first and then I would like to go ahead with the other question. Now try to understand it is saying that number of a bird shooter was asked how many birds he had in the bag. And he's giving one answer. He replied that there were all sparrows but six, all pigeons but six and all ducks but six. So how many birds he had in all? So what do you mean by all sparrows but six? It means that I'm talking about three kinds of birds. So let me write it three kinds of birds. We have sparrows, we have pigeons and we have and we have what ducks. So all sparrows but six means apart from sparrows, the birds which are left out are pigeons and ducks. So pigeon plus duck is equal to six. All pigeons but six means apart from pigeon there are six birds which are sparrows and duck. So sparrow plus duck is equal to six. And all ducks but six means apart from ducks there are six birds which are sparrow plus pigeon and that is equal to six. When I add all of them, this means two s plus two p plus two d is equal to 18 and total number of birds would be s plus p plus d.  So s plus b plus d which is total number of birds. So these total number of birds comes out to be nine. So first answer is correct here. Did you all understand it? Great. Fine. Now let me show you the leaderboard. Okay. Great. See question number two and three would be question number two and three would be best on same information. Question number two and three would be best on same information. So keep have this thing in your mind. Make a column here make it as I was doing make some rows make some columns and then try to answer these questions. Keep on reading the information and make keep on making some tables some some kind of arrangement. This question is based on arrangement. So in arrangement generally we do best questions best on north facing south facing. This question is not based on that but still it is a question of arrangement. So I would like to check how many of you have done it. 15 seconds are left out. Please have some kind of column whatever you can make so that you can arrange people. There are five people. So at least five different buses. Okay. The time is over. Okay. Okay. So most of you have given option B. I will solve both question two and three together. So I would like to show you question number three and also and then I will discuss the question. So can you solve question number three here? Just let me just update this and then I will. Okay. Solve question number three also please don't prompt the answers in the chat box. Please don't prompt the answers in the chat box. Those who couldn't solve why I kept the same time those who couldn't solve question in the first go. I give you an opportunity to do this question again. So whatever you have done till now start from there. That is why the information has been given. That is why information has been given repeated again. I don't want answer of any of these questions in the chat box. So please maintain that. So I hope this much of time actually we have we have you got three minutes to solve this question. So at least I feel that at least one question should be correct in this. So let me check how many of you have done this question. Okay. Wonderful. Out of 47 58 people 38 of you have done it right nearly 60% of you 65% of you. So let me discuss this question and then I will go to the other question. Now look it here. It is saying me that five persons are five men ABCDE read a newspaper. The one who reads first gives it to see the one. It means that let me mark these five people here one, two, three, four and five. Now if I look at these five people. So the one who reads first gives it to see it means that first person is passing to see it means that the position of C is the second position. The one who reads the last has taken from a it means that the person who is reading reading last has taken from a it means that a will come at fourth position. Now there are only three positions left out which is one, three and five and it has been told that he was not the first or last to read. So it means that he can't be at first position. He can't be at fifth position. So he has to come at third position. Now there were two readers between A and B. So there are only two positions. Where should I place B? If I place D here. So the I mean how many readers between A and B is zero. So I can put B here. So B has to go at this position. This is position first. So B has to be at first position. Now there is only one place left out and there is only one person left out which is D. So I put D out here. When I put D out here, my arrangement is complete. Now I go to read the question. D passed the newspaper to whom? So B is first. He is passing the newspaper to the second person who will see. So here second answer is correct. Now if I move to the next question which is question number three. So let me read it. So who read the newspaper last? It's the D. Who read the newspaper last? So here option four is correct. So as we can see here in these questions, question number two option two was correct. And question number three option four is correct. This was C second position and this is D of the last position. So this is what the answer for this question was. Now let me go to leader vote. Okay. Very good. Who was the fastest? Pranav Jay was fastest in this question. Very good. Now let me give you another question. Now next three questions would be best on same information. Next three questions are best on same information. So solve this question. So in this question, actually you will have to make a table where you will have to fit in the persons. And then there are several variables. The variables that I discussed yesterday, you will have to take few variables wherever it is applicable, wherever it is not applicable, you will have to avoid that. So make that table rows and column that I was making yesterday and then perhaps you'll be able to solve this question quickly. Please, even if you solve it, don't put, don't give the answers in the chat box. So what is important in this case that you make table. If you don't make table, you'll get confused somewhere. Only a few people can solve without table. Please don't do that. Accuracy gets hampered over there. Make tables in this. Only few seconds are left out. I will solve this question after the three questions on the same logic. Okay. Let me check how many of you have got it right. Okay. Very good. So here again it increased by out of 57 people 39. So nearly 65% of students have got it right. Very good. Let me go to the leaderboard. Okay. Momita was fastest. Very good. Let me go to this question. The question is best on same same same logic. The question is best on same sentences. So please try solving it. If time was short for you guys, then I have made, I have written the questions again. This is repeated here. So you can try those who got it wrong in the first attempt. Please try to make that table of rows and column where you have different variables. So don't try to do without making table. There are 15, 16 questions, 16 questions. So now only a few seconds are left out. Please make sure that the table that you have made is full of information, right information, which has been given here. This question is easy. You just have to make table and take few boxes here and there. Let me check how many of you have got it right. Okay. Wonderful. I can see a lot of people have improved their performance. So in this question, the accuracy rate was a good down. Let me go to leaderboard and check who is fastest out here. So I should have was fastest here. Very good. So now let's go to next question is best on the same same logic. After this question, I'm going to solve this still. I got nearly 14, 15 people getting it wrong. You have enough time guys for this question. I have given four and a half minute times to all of you so that at least one question, you can get it right. Actually in your exam, you will not get this much of time to solve this kind of questions. But you have to solve it in two to three minutes. That's more than enough. So but because we are doing it here in a quiz format. So I have given given more time over here so that you can utilize this time to improve your accuracy. So is my screen okay now? Okay. Okay. Only 15 seconds time to solve these questions and okay. Let me check how many of you have got it right. Okay. Again, similar number of people. I mean, I'm getting almost similar number of people getting the questions right, which is a trend which I would like to break in between. So now let me solve this question. Six students ABCDE sorry ABCDEF are sitting in a field. Okay. Fine. So let me read the complete question. How I attempt the question I'm trying to show you. A and B are from Nehru House and the rest belong to and the rest of them belong to Gandhi House. So there are two houses Nehru House and Gandhi houses and D and F are tall. Others are short. Fine. And ACD are wearing glasses while others are not wearing glasses. Okay. Very good. So there are three kinds of information given over here. So ABCD or let me just write another format. Let me write it here. ABCDEF and A and B are from Nehru House. So I'm writing house here and A and B are from Nehru House. So I'm writing N and the others belong to Gandhi House. So GGGG here. Then height. So I'm writing tall and short because these are the words used. So D and F are tall. So I'm writing short here. Others are short. So I'm writing short here and C and D are wearing glasses. So I'm writing glasses here. So C and D are wearing it. So I'm writing C and D. They are wearing glasses and others are not wearing glasses. So I'm just crossing this. Now there are few questions which has been asked to me. So these questions are which of the two students. Which one? ACD is also wearing glasses. Where ACD is okay. I perhaps missed this information. Just give me here. Okay. A is also wearing glasses. Okay. Which two students who are not wearing glasses are short. So try to understand people who are not wearing glasses are B, E and F. Out of that F is tall. So B and E are those people who are not wearing glasses and they are short. So third answer is correct here. Now let me move to another question. So in this question, in this question, it has been asked to me that one second. Just give me a moment. Let me go a little bit. It has been asked to me that which student of Gandhi House is, which short student of Gandhi House is not wearing glasses. So Gandhi House, these are the four people, C, D, E, F. And out of this, people who are short are C and E. And out of that, E is not wearing glasses. So this is E is the correct answer out here. Now let me go to another question. So what is this? This is nothing but which tall student of Gandhi House is not wearing glasses. So only two tall students and F is a tall student from Gandhi House, which is not wearing glasses. So answer is fourth answer here. How many of you understood all these questions? All three questions. Okay. Great. Great. Great. Fine. Okay. Now let me go to the leaderboard here. Let me check who did it fast. Who got the highest? Aryan Singhal was the fastest, I think. Yes. Very good. Very good. I can see tough competition at least in the first six people out here. Very, very good. Okay. Now let me show you their next question. Okay. So if all this question, there is only one question on this information. There is only one question on this information. So this question in this question, you have to find who is a dancer. An dancer and voice list both in this question. You have to find who is a dancer and voice list both. If you have identified the question, marking answer should be easy ok let me check see the correct answer here ok fine first let me solve this question ok so it is in a group of six women there are four dancer four vocal musicians one actress three violinist so four vocal musicians are there one actress and three violinist Girija and Vanaja are among the violinist so the violinist are Girija and let me write here Girija and Vanaja are violinists Jaleja and Salaja do not know how to play violin so Jaleja and and Shalja no issues I'm solving just look at it Jaleja and Shalja cannot be violinist still I need four violinist sorry how many violinist three violinist so I have to find three one more violinist ok now Shalja and Tanuja are among dancers so Shalja plus Tanuja are dancers now try to understand how many people have written Girija is one Vanaja is second Jaleja is third Shalja is fourth Shalja is fourth and Tanuja is Shalja is fourth Tanuja is fifth now Shalja and Tanuja are dancers I have classified this Shalja Vanaja, Jalja, Vanaja, Shalja, Tanuja are all vocal musicians ok so Jaleja, Vanaja, Shalja and Tanuja are vocal musicians now try to understand two of them are also violinist you had to find that I as I told who is a violinist and dancer both violinist and dancer both this was the question now it doesn't matter Aditi it happens now please understand here first look at this question the question is the question is if I have to find out see I have to find out one violinist I have already found out four musicians I have found out two dancers I have found out I have found out try to understand if I have to find out a dancer and a violinist so please understand that Jaleja cannot be violinist Pooja has not been mentioned so I don't know what Pooja is and Shalja is a dancer but Shalja cannot be a violinist so three answers are gone only Tanuja is left out so even if you could have looked at this this this option Tanuja can only be a dancer and a violinist why because Jaleja cannot be a dancer sorry or sorry a violinist similarly Shalja cannot be a violinist Pooja there is no information given so there is only one Tanuja who can be dancer and the violinist so dancer is given here Shalja and Tanuja are among dancers here is dancer given here okay so this question the option is see now let's solve next question the next question is here how this question this question is completely clear make tables if you don't make table question will remain unclear make tables for these kind of questions before I give you some kind of answer something like that how many of you were able to solve this question in less time okay whatever information you have collated whatever information you have collated please ease down whatever information you have collated let me now go to the question only Smriti was able to solve it perhaps out of these people the next question is based on the same information solve it it's it's on the board Disha it's the same question is Surya please focus on solving question please make it table only 13 seconds I hope I've given you three minutes now to solve this question I hope I'll get a better result in this in this question because three minutes is a good enough time to solve these kind of questions still there is a lot of people getting it wrong now I'm going to leaderboard next question is also based on same type of question let me check how many of you have done it right okay fine next question is also based on same kind of question solve this again you guys started easy please let others solve it make the table this question should have and I'll not solve this question because I can see there is another question after this and then next to next question is again based on this so I would like to solve this question after two questions how many of you have got it right okay now here I'm getting a bit of improvement because more time you have taken to this question let me check how many of you in the leaderboard we are able to solve it Aniket was able to solve it then Aryan was fastest I think okay wonderful great okay now let me go to this question keep the answer intact for this no okay this is this okay solve this question then perhaps this is the last question of this group perhaps let me check let me check this I I mean you solve this may I hope till now you have made the tables so this question should not take much time because we have already taken four and a half minutes to solve this this question so this question should be like pick and wait for for for this kind of question because the fourth part of this question so perhaps okay maybe maybe let me check the answer 36 people have got it wrong I don't know why what's the reason answer is C as in the person C it's option B not the option C okay let me wait all of you let me check sir even in the last to last question I think the same thing happened yes sir is it also let me check let me check that's not a problem so if you have got it right you should be happy anyway this is not an actual NTSA examination so if your answer is right you should be happy with that forget about the result and score and all those things just look at here the the quiz is for the sake of purpose all of you should should should have two three things in mind that first the time given the time given should be sufficient enough to solve the question if you are not able to solve this kind of question in three minutes then probably we need to increase the speed I am writing name of five people AB CD E and there is a profession for these people and then there is a sports for these people these are the only variables available in the question is there any other variable available in this question yes no so even if one answer has been without because this has been typed if one answer has been typed here and there so doesn't matter a place cricket so this guy plays cricket but he's not an engineer so I am writing engineer and I'm crossing I'm just showing you how I attempt these kind of question D is an auditor so if D is an auditor and doesn't play hockey so this guy doesn't play hockey so hockey is one from here advocate and and and try to understand advocate and doctor are not interested in basketball so advocate plus doctor they don't play basketball so this is gone and also a doesn't play basketball so this is also one B is an expert goal player so where is be B is an expert expert goal player and B is not an advocate this guy is not an advocate he plays tennis so let me write tennis here let me write with some other color just give me a moment let me write tennis here and this guy E what who is he he's a banker okay wonderful see who doesn't like golf see all see doesn't play golf and try to understand C is not doctor and advocate so auditor and banker are already gone and C is not doctor and advocate so auditor banker gone doctor and advocate gone so only one profession is left out that is of engineering and see doesn't like golf now try to understand if C doesn't golf is already gone this is this was not needed now there are two professions left out so these professions are advocate and doctor so B is not an advocate so B would be doctor and A would be advocate is there any doubt till now is there any doubt till now okay fine if there is no doubt then look at here now it has been given that advocate and doctor doesn't play basketball this is this is given now auditor doesn't play hockey so hockey there are only two places left out for hockey so engineer will play hockey and there is only one sports left out which is the sports left out let me just read that what are the sports cricket is done golf is done tennis is done hockey is done is there a sports which I'm missing basketball yes so I'm missing basketball so this guy plays basketball now this is the complete this thing how many of you saw this question by this method okay so if you saw the question by this method then this is see if you read any book and if you read about efficiency this is how you have to solve the question by making making this kind of table why I'm forcing this sometimes I just tell few method tell about talk about few methods why I talk about few methods because what happens is in few of in these kind of questions where accuracy as well as speed both matters you have to minimize the length of the table so if you start writing advocate doctor engineer auditor banker and then then cricket goal hockey so you have 10 different columns for five different people and five different roles so identifying data and then no there is no other way if you don't structure the data at one particular point it doesn't take I saw it how many how much time I've taken I started at 843 after explaining also the I've taken three minutes after explaining also I've taken three minutes so if you practice it more practice it you can solve this kind of question you will have a set of questions in one and a half to two minutes because if you don't make table it is very your structure will not be there the data will fall flat here and there so that is why making table is very very important you you go on and then look at any book there would be tables you follow any particular you follow any particular book any particular here and there whatever you you try to do everywhere there would be table why table because the data can be fit there it can be it can be made structured there in the table so that's why table is important so who is a doctor so be a doctor now just give me a moment who is a doctor be a doctor where there would be consecutive sub questions definitely there would be at least at least one set of question where you will be given this kind of data and there would be three to four questions like this so be is the doctor here doesn't matter I am a V is the doctor here and next question is let me just go through who is the basketball player so basketball player was D then next question is who is what is the profession of a profession of a is advocate so this is the kind of question I'm not showing you rest of the questions because they are the quiz questions are there so I saw these questions perhaps you understood this now let me go to the next set of question so next three four questions would be best on I didn't do the forced problem I will do that later why because in between there was a question which is going to come so I couldn't scroll down did you understand next set of questions are here yes solve this question this is best on the same question best on the same question no one second no this is not best on the same question this is a different question different question solve this make tables if you are not making tables then that would be a great that would be I hope you are done with this question doesn't matter I think there is some problem just solve the questions doesn't matter doesn't matter I just just give me a moment there is some problem happening please please wait solve this question doesn't matter may not we don't have that much of time solve the question and get the right answer I am giving you the answers I'm giving you the all the answers ananya when I'm making the table all answers are available if you want I can update the sheet in the okay let me check okay fine this answer is correct next question perhaps this is the last question last or second last question one more after this I think yes okay next question okay I think this was the last question just just do it give the answer here oh yes 90% will who are these wonderful luch wait okay all of you are done with this who are those wonderful who are these wonderful five people who said sat I'm just happy that I got at least six people more than 10% people saying sat how will you say sat when you are not studying for sat till now the June is in danger's your history and geography is your history and geography is not over leave it once again solve this is the last question I hope the answer has been marked correctly done with this question okay very good yes this is the last question you don't have time on a kid leave it there would be better this thing I have to discuss the question and then it will be nine see this only one or two question here and there anyway you are leading so doesn't matter okay so this is the end of the quiz very good aniquette Gupta I don't have the ID and password okay that's the problem so I can't log in and change it okay this question was all about let me let me just solve this question let me just solve this question the question was there are a group of six persons a b c d e they are members of they are members of some cosmopolitan club in South Delhi one of these six out of these six persons to our musicians to our tennis player one is a profession has been given and and then marital status has been given then male female has been given a is a pop singer so a is a pop singer how many pop singers are there there is only one pop singer so a is a pop singer and is married to be musician so he is married to be and be is musician so be is married to a then the magician is married to be okay who is of the same profession as that of F so be and F are same and if be and F are same so there are two tennis players and two musicians so either there will be tennis player or there would be there would be musicians now try to understand please understand this statement a b c d are married couples so a and d are already married so be would be married to see and see would be married to be ah F and C are brothers so if F and C are brothers so F is male and C is male and similarly D and E are sisters so D and E are sisters so D is female and E is female now if D is female then a would be male and because C is male then B would be female so I know gender of all of them so a would be male B would be female C would be male D and E would be female and F would be male then I have pair of tennis players only one is male now try to understand B and F can play tennis player B and F can be tennis player or B and F can be musician so if I made if I make B and F no sorry B and F cannot be musician because D is musician it has been written somewhere it has been written yeah D is a musician now how many musicians I have I have two musicians and B and F have same profession so B would be a tennis player and F would be a tennis player now try to understand there are two professions left out one is musician try to understand one is there is one statement written that the magician is married to be means that understand here the magician is married to be who is married to be C is married to me so married to be so this is magician C would be magician and then there is only one thing left out which is E so E would be what E would be a tennis player E would be a musician and they are non-married so this is this is the kind of table I'll let here these type of questions are called analytical reasoning very less number of questions are there of analytical reasoning in in no it's not syllogism syllogism is something else okay how many of you understood the explanation great fine so I will update these kind of questions a few more questions from a book answers are not there so you will have to find out answer and in case of any particular in case of any particular doubt write I mean write back to me so thank you so much for joining and very good Aniket so there are a few here problem here so it doesn't matter thank you so much for joining see you all sometime else with with a better kind of fine okay thank you bye bye


Morning everyone, so today is Friday, January 24th at 7.52 a.m. Gonna do a video watches today So something I want to talk about before I start is that last month we ran a Christmas sale that we discounted annual We discount lifetime that kind of gave some people the final push that they needed to either upgrade or to join So we decided to do it again this month So what we're gonna kind of do is something different. We're gonna do a 24-hour discount only So what we're gonna do is we're discounting the price of annual from 1790 to 1590 and the price of lifetime from 5995 to 4995 So this is kind of just gonna be until tomorrow at 8 a.m So if you want to upgrade inside MIC you could DM Tosh if you are you know new to MIC and curious This is probably the best time to join We are actually raising our price on February 1st. The price of monthly is going from 179 to 197 the price of annual is going from 1790 to 1890 and the price of lifetime is gonna stay the same So if you join now you're gonna get your prices grandfathered in for life Also for those that don't know we're doing our trader clinic webinar next Tuesday That's an exclusive webinar for lifetime members only that annual members have access to this is basically a you know One to two hour webinar that me and Tosh do once a month where we're gonna bring on lifetime members and have them Ask us questions live and try to get more in depth with more in like smaller group mentorship So yeah, if you guys want to sign up, I have the link in the watch list and I'll post the link in the video as well So let's get started Let's start with codecs so This was a picture perfect death line setup Yesterday, so we had a death line around 250 It's right around here And what ended up happening is broke the death line and almost instantly went from 260 to 211 It's almost 50 cents a share in one candle. So I sure the 250 break and I got out at 220. I think it was so Coming to today. I'm looking for that same level 250 as the ultimate resistance But what I also see is a level or over here around 240 So the perfect role we get a push towards 230 240 and 250 to short this low hanging fruit And the AX so this stock Although it's kind of been doing the same trend every day of popping and tanking popping and tanking I think it's a little bit overdue for a bounce. I don't really like it for a short yet I'd rather wait for it to kind of go near this 850 level or this 820s level before I get interested $8 is not really gonna do it for me Ideally the best case scenario is waiting for this 850 outline not even sure if I'll trade it But I kind of want to have it on watch just in case NNVC So my plan the morning is to wait for this to kind of push towards 650 you can see some pretty big resistance there So ideally the trade would be wait for a push towards a 650 and then stop out At 670s so risk 20 cents to make hopefully 50 cents So not too sure if I'm gonna trade this stock But what I see is a resistance level at 450 so maybe I can get a 440 short and a 450 short And then it goes back red This is something that I'm not really interested in it seems like it's holding up a little bit too well Seems like there's a little bit too many shorts in it. So I don't really want to get involved and last but not least Or did I talk about TNXP? No, so TNXP is also another one. This is a former runner Every time it gets volume of tanks.  I mean This sucks, but I mean we have the 190s level and we have kind of like that twos level So in the morning and now we have 185 view apps What I'm gonna do is I'm gonna look to short this 185 view app level There's 190s level and there's two level in the morning. Hopefully we pop that high SAEX also a former runner. This is kind of a chatroom target.  So Ideally on a setup like this. I see view app is 340 So I would take a small starter here add here add here add here and then stop out above again 30% rule so you could use 10% 10% 10% and yeah Let me think if there's anything else I have to talk about. Oh, yeah So what I do is I do a secret word at the end of the video So if you're an MIC reply the thread if you are not in MIC Just reply like comment on the video The reason why I do this is so that everyone that watches towards the end of the video I know who's actually watching it and getting to the end.


I'm here at Moodle Mood Global with Daphne Elvesch. Elvesch? Elvesch. Elvesch. Thank you, Daphne. Who's the project manager at Healthy Foundation.  You support health professionals and community workers in vulnerable, I guess you'd say, societies in many countries in Africa. Is that a good description, Daphne? Yeah, yeah, we do capacity strengthening for health care professionals, mainly in resource restricted settings. So mainly sub-Saharan Africa. And I just watched your presentation, which was great. So thank you for doing that at Moodle Mood. I was really struck by that stat you had on one of your slides, which I think it was the maternal mortality rate. He said that the goal was to progress from 401 deaths. Is that right? Yeah. It's very sad. Emily? So in 2017, we can see from Democratic Health Surveys that the maternal mortality ratio was 401 per 100,000 life births. And the Sustainable Development Tree target is to come back to 70 per 100,000 life births by 2030. Yeah, absolutely. That's an awesome target. So tell me, how is Healthy Foundation trying to support that target? And where does Moodle fit into that? Yeah, so we try to support that by different courses, like the Pandemic E-Response course and the SRE Education course that we provide to both in-service and pre-service midwives. So those that are still studying at university and that are already on the job. And we do so by using Google, using e-learning modules on different topics related to maternal health. So it's about, for instance, how to provide maternal health care during the pandemic, how to provide essential sexual and reproductive health services, newborn care, access to safe abortion or post-abortion care. And we provide that through blended learning, a combination of face-to-face workshops and e-learning modules. And with this combination, we aim to strengthen the skills and capacity of those midwives to provide quality care and to continue their jobs also during the pandemic or humanitarian conflicts like in Ethiopia. So in Ethiopia, I'm imagining you would have health care workers that are working in particular communities. And so you're working with them in the classroom as well as they are working with Moodle online. Is that correct? Yes, that's correct. So we have three faces, a kick-off workshop where we bring them together in a university close to them, using Ades Ababa or Jima. Then they have a self-study period of three to four months where they engage with e-learning modules and also put their new knowledge into practice already with some community outreach activities in their own catchment areas. And then we bring them together once more for a follow-up workshop in the university. Amazing. Is connectivity an issue in those environments? Yes, yes. Internet connectivity is an issue, but that's why we chose to work with the Moodle app offline as well. So we upload the e-learning content by score and that makes it downloadable for the participants to complete offline. And also by using the interactive elements like the kick-off and follow-up workshops, they can connect with Wi-Fi. That helps as well. That's an amazing combination. So tell me, you're talking about a specific program in Ethiopia. How many community health workers have you trained with this particular program? So for the SRHRE Education and Pandemic E-Response course, we trained total 539 midwives, both pre-service and in-service. And are you able to see what impact that has in the community? The impact it has is that sensitive topics or taboo topics can, for instance, be discussed by these midwives with the community members like domestic violence, gender-based violence, but also topics related to sexuality because they engage with these topics through the e-learning modules and also practice that in the community. Also they've learned new skills in the face-to-face sessions and they can apply in the communities. And what's the feedback from the health care workers? Are they young, generally, female, male, a bit of everything? Yeah, we try to target a 50-50 balance in gender, so 50% of the midwives are female and the other 50% are males. Typically they're rather young, I have to say. And what kind of feedback? Yeah, so for instance the quotes that I showed during my presentation is that I really appreciate the blended format. So the combination of offline and online, they appreciate that they can complete it at their own pace, in their own time. That's the... What else was on the slides? Well, I think so, remember it. Yes, that they appreciate it being able to work offline, I think, and their knowledge development is really significant through the course, which is awesome. Yeah, and also the digital literacy skills building is also really appreciated by having a kickoff workshop and explaining the eLearning modules and how to navigate around the LMS is also very helpful. And that builds the digital literacy skills. I know you've had a busy afternoon. One last question. What attracted you to Moodle? What made you select Moodle as your LMS? Yeah, so we searched for a new LMS to hand over more responsibilities and ownership to our partners. And we selected the LMS based on search requirements, like being open source, being SCORM compliant and having offline functionality, which is important for our learners. And that's why we selected Moodle. And what's really an added advantage of Moodle is also the community, the strong Moodle community that allows us to tap into questions or answers to questions, basically, that we can find online, that we can find on the Moodle Academy and also at the Moodle Mood conference. Awesome. Thank you so much, David. Thank you.


Okay, we're back here live in Las Vegas for Amazon. Reinvent, this is theCUBE, our exclusive coverage of the event. I'm John Furrier, the founder of SiliconANG. I'm joined with my co-host Dave Vellante. Our next guest is Elliott Horowitz, co-founder and CTO of MongoDB. Great to have you on.  Obviously, Mongo has been an amazing success. We've had you guys on theCUBE, I think. Going back two years ago, Oracle Open World, just watching the enormous rise of Mongo has been really fun to watch. There's two trends that we've always loved, that's Hadoop and Mongo because developers, the LAMPstack developers were doing stuff, but we're pretty cutting edge with Open Source and MySQL and all this great stuff, but it was just like a glass ceiling, right? And then breaking through, making it really easy was something that you guys really did well. And I want to get your perspective on that right now. Looking back, where you guys were, and kind of now, with all the hype of, oh, Amazon's taking over the world, go back in time for a bit before we get to someone who's on the show, and what was that breakthrough for Mongo because you guys really hit the nerve from the beginning and then had a breakout right when it was like, oh, this is easy. So I think the breakout for us is really figuring out early on what developers really wanted from a pure productivity standpoint. But it's really a matter of figuring out, all right, I've got a developer, they really just want to build the product. They don't want to work on databases, they don't want to figure out how to scale a database or how to work around the database, they just want to store their data and interact with it easily so they can do their job. And I think the key thing we figured out early on was the data model. The data model of MongoDB lets developers be very productive, it lets them scale, it lets them do all these things pretty easily without actually reinventing the entire way they interact with the database, right? There's two things I think that were very good. One is we changed the data model from relational to a document, and we also kept a lot of the things people were used to, we got how indexing works and how consistency works. We kept those things from the relational model so people coming over didn't have to relearn everything because there's already a lot to learn. Yeah, you move from different language, different frameworks, new syntax, new way of doing things. So you guys really kind of spoke the language of the guys in the mainstream web development side, right? But wanted to give them more scale. That feels like, that is like the DevOps philosophy, right, I want to program, write code and make a lot of the stuff under the covers work at scale, scale and work better, right? That's kind of the DevOps philosophy. Yeah, and it's all, in my mind, it's all about productivity, right? DevOps is largely about productivity, about reducing the time to market, reducing the time to get things out there, reducing the complexity of software and operations and managing things more simply. And I think that's really what a lot of what we want to do is increase developer productivity, increase ops productivity by giving them better tools, by giving them a product that takes a lot of the things they had to do before, unless I'm focused on their core mission, right? Because no one starts, except for us, right? No one starts a company and wants to work on databases, but they start a company to build a product, to build whatever it is they're building, and they don't want to, and our history had been, every time we wanted to build a product, we ended up spending all of our time working on databases, which was very counterintuitive to what we actually wanted to do. Yeah, total pain in the ass, and we wanted to actually just solve the problem once and for all, so the next time we wanted to build an application, we could actually just build the application. That's the beautiful thing about leverage, right? When you have leverage, then better things happen, and it's also an open source ethos too, build on the shoulders of other stuff. I will say, Dave and I, we're joking like a couple years ago, actually last year we said, if 10 years ago, if you went to a party and said, hey, I'm a database expert, oh yeah, where's someone else?  I go to a lot of events for my kids' school, right? So I was at an event the other night, and I said, yeah, I work for a database company, you don't know what it is, what is it? A MongoDB, a MongoDB, that's so cool. Guys who I would have never thought would have known anything about databases. It's a pool of jays. Cool is a word because you guys create value, and one of the things we've been talking about here is the startups that we've been showcasing, Elliott, is, the time to value is just a concept that just makes good things happen, whether you're an agency doing stuff for clients or you're shipping code. When people start seeing traction or anything good or bad, they can make adjustments, right? Iterate through, agile, whatever you want to call it. So, you know, the cloud is perfect. You guys have a perfect product for that. But I got to ask you, and let's kind of keep that timeline going down. You've been criticized in the past, and this is just natural evolution. You can't scale. At a certain point, Mongo doesn't scale. You guys have addressed that. So I want you to talk about that specifically. You know, some people say, hey, you know, up to a certain point, Mongo's great, but at some point it doesn't scale. How do you address that to the folks who say that? And what are you guys doing to push that scale? So, you know, I think a lot of that comes from a few things. And I think a few years ago, there was this perfect storm where Mongo was still a little bit immature in some ways, especially concurrency. And frankly, AWS had some problems where EBS was a little slow and they didn't have SSDs or priority IOPS at that point. And you actually had this little bit of a perfect storm of problems where if you were using Mongo and you were on AWS, it didn't scale very well, and it was trouble. And by scale in this case, they really mean scaling up on a single server, right? Not horizontal scalability, but just, you know, making good use of the physical attributes of the machine. And so over the last two years, a few things have happened. One is Mongo's gotten a lot better at concurrency. So we've done a lot of work on that. It's still a long way to go, but we've made a ton of progress. I think over the next couple of years, we'll make a lot more progress, but we've done a lot of progress. And also like AWS has improved dramatically as well, right? They now have two new products, your priority IOPS and SSDs.  One of the key things to remember at MongoDB is, it's still only very early in the database space. If you compare it to Oracle or any established database, it's still a very young product. And databases are one of the more complicated things to build, and these things will take time to fully mature. But I think over the last two years, you've seen a lot of improvements. Over the next two to four years, I'll see a lot more improvements. So a long way to go. So what led you to take us back? What led you to commit so much of your time to Mongo? You were describing earlier that you were trying to solve problems and improve productivity. Well, why Mongo? And then why has Mongo been so successful when you've got 50 other no-SQL databases out there? Yeah, so Mongo for me, when we were looking at, when we started trying to figure out, all right, we sold Shopwiki, we were trying to figure out what to do a little bit, and we were thinking about building some applications, and every time we came back to it, we were like, well, we don't like the tools available to us. And we knew we were going to get bogged down actually building databases. And the more we thought about it, in the last decade before that, some of the best times I had as a developer was actually building databases and solving the data problems. And it was like, all right, well, why try to solve these things and this one niche application again, let's just go ahead and build a database that actually works for us. And we really just built what we wish we had, right? Which is a great thing to do, is build something that I want. And then hopefully, the idea at that one was hopefully other developers feel like us and want it also. And it turns out they did. And I think the main reason really comes down to a few things. One is the document model. The document model is intuitive for people. It makes sense. It's very productive. It's really easy to work with. The document model lets you scale horizontally. So that really drives everything about the product and everything about the adoption where people really can be incredibly productive with their main work rather than having to work on these problems they don't really care about. So you heard the Amazon announcements today, probably knew they were coming up with the optimized compute, the SSDPC we're talking about. Talk a little bit more about what that means for your customers. So I think it's definitely great for our customers. Because before, if you wanted to use SSD's and Mongo, you had to use these very expensive instances that frankly were pretty cross-rehibited for some applications. And I think they brought them down to the large instances where now it really brings it into the realm of possibility for a lot smaller companies. It really just lets people be a lot more cost effective with Mongo and with any other application that is IO intensive. Right, so and the good news is unlike companies that sell tons of licenses, you don't have to worry about these optimized instances eating away at the license. I love it. And for us, especially with people on AWS, what we care about really, first and foremost is making developers productive, making people really happy with Mongo, making Mongo a really great tool for people. And over time, as that happens, I think monetizing it is hard, but the onus then becomes on us to figure out how to add value in ways that people want to pay us. But first and foremost, our goal really is to make developers productive, make operations people productive and really sort of drive the Mongo ecosystem. So you've watched the evolution of databases over the years and markets evolve over the years. You got to expect there's going to be consolidation in this business, maybe not tomorrow, but over time, it's got to happen, right? So first of all, do you agree with that? And how do you see that shaking out? I mean, what do you think is the timeframe will be?  So I definitely think there will be consolidation, right? And I think that there'll be consolidation in two ways. One is the number of database vendors. And two is right now you sort of have this mentality of, oh, I'm just going to try a different database for every different problem I have. And I don't think that's really the right model, right? I think the days of like one database for all my problems is definitely gone. You're not going to have companies betting everything at a single database, but I don't think companies are going to want to have 20 different operational data sources. I think you're going to want to have three, maybe four, and you're going to want three or four ones that really cover the entire, you know, spectrum of your database needs. And I think what you'll see is a few different things. I'll have a relational database, because relational databases are not going to go away. There's a lot of great use cases for relational databases. You're going to have some sort of data warehouse, because you've got a lot of data and you need something that does batch processing where you can sort of do in the background, do massive jobs, and you literally understand the sort of massive amount of data you're storing. And you'll definitely need some sort of document database where you can store sort of some loosely structured data that's just, you know, so developers can be more productive in certain cases. And maybe you'll also want something like a key value store cash kind of system that is a little bit simpler and a little bit more lightweight. And I think that's, and then I think that's where the market will go. And I think one of the reasons why there are so many vendors right now is you've got different vendors and they all have sort of one feature that people really care about, but they're all, the products are so new that there isn't one that has all of them yet. And then sort of in the NoSQL market. And I think what you'll see over time is that as, you know, these databases will actually keep adding features and really sort of consolidating feature sets as well. Right, you know, have products that can do lots of different things. Right, one of the reasons why people choose other databases over Mongo today is for eventual consistency. We view that as a feature that Mongo should have in the feature. Doesn't have it today, I won't have it tomorrow, but over the next couple of years we think it absolutely will have that feature. And I think that's, those are the kinds of things where you'll definitely see consolidation as this product is. So you're consolidating around those four areas and those four areas will cover the sort of spectrum of requirements for the foreseeable future. Yeah, that's my belief. And I think, you know, whether we're the document database of the future, I mean, then it's really, I think we will be and we just have to make sure we keep delivering on the product and keep advancing it and not really get stagnant. You guys certainly have established the standard in my opinion. And I want to get more in detail on the consolidation. I would definitely agree with you on the assessment of those areas. But I want to ask you to describe the use cases because, you know, I always see blog posters. I just read one yesterday. It was Trashing Mongo. But you know, you can't please everybody, right? Maybe someone's using you guys in the wrong way. Someone's in your leader. You know, well, it's also bad design. Maybe you just pick it up because you're used to it and you might misfire on a project. So I want you to just not set the record straight, but just educate the folks out there.   We do the job well, extremely well. And here's areas that quite frankly, you might not want to use Mongo. Yeah, horses for courses. Take us through. Take us the horses for courses, as Dave says. Right. So I think, you know, areas where Mongo works really well is anything where you've got a lot of data about an entity. So think user profiles. But if I want to start information about a person, right, I've got lots of different attributes. I've got different things like addresses, where it's not a one-to-one mapping, where it's a one-to-many mapping. I've got addresses or likes and dislikes and all these attributes. And storing those in relational databases is actually very hard and very tricky. So that's a place where MongoDB makes a lot of sense. Right, so any kind of CMS, CRM type data, those things make a lot of sense. For relational databases, there are cases where you have data that is relational. And it's kind of amusing if you actually go back and look at the original relational database papers, they actually lay out a set of use cases that they're designing for. And frankly, the use cases they were designing for, relational databases are still the best options for those. Right, if you think about accounting and finance, they actually are the best. And they lay them out very well in the original papers. And what happened is they built these things for those use cases, and people found that they were good enough for other things until they tacked those things on. But the original design goals, they've actually met them incredibly well. So would you say then, if I prove out the following phrase, Mongo is really good for loosely structured data. I mean, unstructured means it's got nothing. Data always has structure. But what we were basically saying is, hey, here's some loosely structured data, and we can help you just store it. I think loosely structured is definitely a great, I think we can do more things than loosely structured, but loosely is a great example for us. Where you've got different kinds of things that are kind of similar, but kind of different. Right, you've got different types of media. You've got videos and images. And you don't know yet how they relate to anything, so you just want to store them. Right, you've got images. A little bit of metadata.  You've got images and you've got video. You want to put them all in the same thing so you can show them together and search for them together. But they are different. They've got different attributes, sort of a little bit loose. So is this why you guys, is this why you're having such success with web apps and mobile apps? Because think of it like, well, key value storage is also good for web apps too, but there's a lot of social data out there where I got an app and I might want to go get some data. I just don't know when or why I'm going to get that data. Yeah, that's a good use case. The other use case is anytime where you're dealing with APIs. You're dealing with like 50 different providers and they all have different APIs. Well, they're going to be changing their APIs all the time and they're probably giving you some JSON back and they may change it. They may add fields at some point. So you may actually have a structure at any one time or a scheme at one point, but that's changing and you don't actually have control of it. So it's actually a great use case for things like that. Schema less and schema light, whatever you want to call it. I mean, but not hardcore schema. That's relational. Oh, the relational can keep that. We just had Duke and HBase fit in there. Obviously that's a different philosophy. It's getting some traction. Some are saying that it's losing a little bit of traction right now.  It's still one of the, it's still the best solution for offline batch processing. And what you see is a lot of people using Mongo and Hadoop in conjunction with each other. They store their OLTP data with Mongo and then they process due to batch processing in Hadoop. We had a big H base thing. I moved it to DynamoDB almost story itself, but we basically would roll it up in my sequel. We had a huge batch. Yeah. I mean, so Hadoop is still a great way to do that.  So I think, you know, as I said before, I think you will have a warehouse, you know, you need warehouse products, right? It's a different workload. You need different features. Last two minutes, I want to get a thread in. I got trashed on Twitter earlier. I made a tweet that said, and again, it's always hard to tweet when I'm alive on the queue, but I did say Amazon is extending their lead just with all their new integrated stack on open source and moving faster than open source.  Of course they're using open source. So I've got to ask you the open source question. And I asked Martin Mikos yesterday, I said, tell me what's different.  He says, 10 years ago, it was about source code. Today, it's about source code and about data and about APIs. And so talk about that. Talk about that dynamic of open source now. Do you agree with him? That's not just what the source code anymore? I mean, I think it's more about the product now. But I think people, you know, the source goes there. And I think in some cases, open source has become table stakes, right? I don't think an infrastructure product can actually exist as a closed source product anymore. I don't think if you try to launch a closed source database and try to get some sort of wide adoption, I don't think you can do it. So I think open source has become table stakes in some ways, where it's the default. If you don't, you know, you have to prove why you shouldn't be open source. And so now it has become about other things. It's a cover charge. Maybe this child will ride the roller coaster, right? That's how you get in. Right, you have to be open source now. So that has completely changed. 10 years ago, they were the first and now everyone has to be if you want to be in this game. So that means speaking to how you guys are having experiences with Mongo and different environments, that's where the APIs come in. Now you got data and APIs. That's right in your wheelhouse. Do you agree that's part of it? I think so. And I think APIs really is, you know, data is a little bit tricky, but APIs I think for sure, right?  And APIs is what powers all of that. And so that is a huge thing for the future. This is theCUBE. We are pro open source. I'm not retracting my comment, Matt say. I'm still sticking by what I said, but on that one thing, we love open source. We love what it does. And certainly the game is changing. The sands are shifting. Amazon is clearly standing there to lead. I believe that they're light years ahead of anyone in the public cloud. But again, open source is a great environment right now. It's changing. It's maturing. It's going to the next generation. This is theCUBE. We'll continue to cover it. We're here live exclusively the Amazon Web Services Conference re-invent. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante. We'll be right back with this short break.