Hey guys, what is up? Welcome to my channel. I finally have another rankings video, one that many of you guys have been asking for. I am ranking all of my Tom Ford Quads. Now something to keep in mind is that I know you can always buy Tom Ford Quads. I have been discontinued everywhere. So I am featuring a lot of Tom Ford Quads that are discontinued. So I will link to all the places that I know you can buy Tom Ford Quads, but a lot of the discontinued ones you can find on Sex All Fifth, cosmetic company outlets, and places like that. You can also, I'm sure, find them on places like Mariah Carey, whatever. You know what I'm talking about as well. Since the last video, my collection has actually depleted a little bit. As you know, I moved away from my mother's collection, so she actually held on to a lot of the good ones. She has the coveted Coco Mirage. I don't have that. So if my collection's a little different, that's why. But nonetheless, I still have 21 Quads to rank from worst to best. I have a very toxic relationship with Tom Ford palettes. I either love them or I hate them. So this one is going to be interesting. Whether or not you think $89 for Tom Ford Quads are worth it, I continue to buy them anyways. I totally understand if you don't think they're worth it. Let's get into it.  A lot of you guys are going to know what one this is. Naked pink. I have never been so disappointed in a Tom Ford quad. This literally gives me nothing. I get no color, no pigment. The only saving grace to this quad is this one right here, but it's just a matter of principle. And I just don't like that he charged $89 for something that literally gives us nothing. You can argue, this is for fair people. It's supposed to be subtle, like no, no, not for $89. Don't ever, ever, ever buy this. They're having trouble selling this. If you do want it, you can probably find it at the cosmetic company store because they certainly are not selling them because they suck. Number 20 is the badass quad. Excuse my language, but that's what it's called. Blame Tommy Tom. This swatch is really, really pretty, but the formulation here is very odd. It's almost sticky-like. I've never come across a formula like this from Tom Ford. It's so sticky that it doesn't apply smooth to the eyelid. It looks really, really patchy. Your best bet with this palette is to use your fingers. Like this shade right here is pretty. It's with the darker shades that it looks quite patchy on the eye. So you can make this work. You can get a pretty look. But again, thinking at the price point, it's just too messy. It's too patchy. The formula is odd. I can't get behind this one. Number 19, I have arabesque. Looks like this. This one had so much potential. It's such a basic color story, but it is underwhelming. This matte shade right here gives you almost nothing. The shimmer shades are already hard panned and they just, again, they're very, very sheer. You just can't get a look that is worth the price point. And I'm a fan of subtle. So don't throw that at me. I love subtle eyeshadows. I can see the beauty in them. But for this quad, it really isn't cutting it. I find it hard to get a look with this that my skin, like my eyelid, doesn't show it through. It's just an odd formulation for the colors and an odd pigmentation for the colors. And for me, I just don't like it. 18, I have golden mank. I believe this one is quite popular, but I have the same feelings as I do with arabesque. It's a little better. Like I do like the brown a little bit, but it still is underwhelming. It's just underwhelming. And I feel like the looks that you get with this are very pretty. Don't get me wrong. I can see why people like this. It's just for the price points. What you can get from Tom Ford is better than this. So this one, again, is not my favorite. It just doesn't give me enough. Now, something to keep in mind though, as I did buy a number of these palettes from the cosmetic company store, so there really is no saying to what age these might be. So that could also be a reason for some of these being less pigmented and less dry, but I can only speak on my experience alone. 17, I have coquettes. This one is fairly new. Again, it just didn't give me what I wanted. I feel like this matte right here, it's not a matte, it's a satin, but the shade was a little patchy. It never quite looked smooth on my eyelid when I put it on. The look that you get is pretty with this. It's quite underwhelming, nothing really special, but yeah, I don't like this one that much. I was disappointed by this one. Number 16, I have a disco desk right here. And now it's a turning point to where all of these palettes definitely can get you a pretty look. They just have to land somewhere. And again, Tom Ford's formula in some palettes, he has things where some of his masks just look patchy. This one looks a little patchy, it's a little powdery and messy. Again, the look that you can get is pretty, but honestly, I'm not even the biggest fan of these colors together. So this is more so of a color story issue. It's not bad, but right off the bat, I can think of a color story that's similar to this that I like better and that's rose topaz. So if you kind of like the vibes of this, I like the quality of rose topaz better. Number 15, I have seductive rose. You would think that this would be at the top of my list because this is kind of a color story that I'm really into. But again, it's this shade right here, it's patchy. I just don't find that acceptable for this price point. I'm not a fan of his older glimmer formulation as well. They get hard pan and over time, you just get less and less glimmer effect on the eye and this is an older palette. So I think that's what it has to do with my thoughts on this. So his formula has since been improved, but these older formulations, I, they look pretty on the eye. Here's the thing with Tom Ford, they can look as boring as ever in the pan. I can complain about how they swatch. Well, even complain about how they apply, but once they are on the eyelid and you know what I'm talking about if you've tried Tom Ford, you can't deny that they don't look gorgeous and elegant. So even though I'm talking my trash, they'll still look gorgeous on the eyes. Number 14, I have Sula Sable, Sula Sol. So this one right here is a really a great work palette. So if you truly do love to wear subtle makeup to work, I actually do recommend this to you. It has kind of a rosier hue. To me, it doesn't stand out. I actually quite like the formulation. I just wish there was a little bit more depth. So I actually do like this quad. I don't have too much bad to say about it. The color story just isn't my favorite, which is a personal preference. Number 13, I have De La Creme, which very similar feelings to the previous palette. I like this color story a little better and I do feel like it gives me a little bit more depth. The shimmers are a little underwhelming here. And again, if you need to wear very subtle makeup to work or that's just the style of makeup you're into, I think you will really like this. I definitely am not discouraging you for picking this up. It's just not my style. I like a little extra glimmer. And believe it or not, Tom Ford is about the glimmer.  I have glimmer, this doesn't. So that's why this falls where it falls. But it's actually really nice, very wearable palette. Number 12, I have Tiger Eye. This is one of the newest quads in his new cream formulation, which I do very much enjoy. This color story is a little bit bland for me. It's actually quite similar to De La Creme and how I feel about it. I do enjoy this formula and I actually used it a lot this previous month because I was moving and I didn't have many eyeshadows with me and I just wanted something quick and easy. So I would grab for a palette like this. I love the subtle shimmer and glow that it gives to the eyelid. It's very, very pretty, but we're starting to get towards the palettes that are really competitive, that I truly love the color stories. So while I do enjoy this formula, the color story is a bit repetitive for Tom Ford, so it's towards the bottom. Number 11 is this baby right here. This one is one that you can probably get on Sacks of Fifth. I'm not sure what they have available now or the cosmetic company store. This is Starry Night. This gives such a pretty and navy smoky eye. I want Tom Ford to come out with some more smoky palettes because Tom Ford, believe it or not, does come out with one of the best smoky formulas. He has a way in his formula to make the smoky eye look very elegant and super easy and quick to do and this is one of them. Haven't seen him come out with a navy formula or color story in a while and this shade right here is Duo Chrome. It is such a fun one. Unfortunately, I just don't reach for it a lot. Navy is a color that I don't find too flatter. Very well, I just don't like it as much but this is such a fun palette and like I said, Tom Ford does a mean, mean, mean smoky palette. Number 10, I have Rose Prismay which was not one of my favorite palettes in 2021 to come out but honestly, it has grown on me. I think about it a lot compared to the Naked Pink which I hated but this one is actually pretty on the eyes. It doesn't give a lot of depth at all but it just really gives an ethereal, glowy, rosy kind of look which is a look that I have learned to love over the last couple of months. It's not about the depth, it's about the glow and I've been enjoying that more lately so this has crawled up for sure. It would have been towards the bottom like three or four months ago but I've given into that style and that look. Number nine is Noa Fume, excuse me if I'm mispronouncing these but this one is a beautiful, cotoned neutral palette. The formulation in here doesn't have much glimmer or shimmer which is the formula that I do enjoy from Tom Ford and it's not the wet to dry formula but this is a solid neutral palette to reach for. Typically when I use this, I like to grab into another palette of his for something a little bit more glimmery but it's really, really nice, a nice staple palette to have. Number eight is Rose Topaz. This is the palette that I was talking about that I think is just a better version of disco dust. This is his new cream formulation and I did not like this palette. I was not moved by it really when I first tried it but once the look is complete on the eyelid it is so stunning. It's such a pretty cool toned smoky eye that is so easy to do and it just looks effortless but still so sophisticated and smoky so I really do actually enjoy this one a lot more now. I don't think it's a must have from Tom Ford but it's another one that has certainly grown on my list. Number seven, Insolent Rose. This is one, I didn't like it at first. This is a pattern with Tom Ford, I don't like it at first but then I wear it a few times and I love the look so much. I'm wearing this one right now. It gives such a pretty subtle like rosy mauve kind of look. I love the glimmer shade right here. I lusted after this one for a long time. I would swatch it all the time in Sephora and I finally got it and I really really like this one. So if you do love the more subtle wearable pinky mauve looks I think you will enjoy this one if you enjoy the sophistication of a Tom Ford palette. I have the glimmer all over my eyelid. It looks really pretty and sparkly.  This one is a very pretty one. Number six, Titanium Smoke. This is one of the limited edition palettes but this is definitely one of the best smokey palettes I have ever come across. The black in here is insane and the thing with Tom Ford smokey palettes that make them so special is how effortless it is to get a look. It looks like you spent a lot more time than you did. You can pretty much get a smokey eye with this palette with your eyes closed. So if you like smokey eyes and you happen to run across this one I totally recommend it but you definitely need to like smokey eyes. Number five is Metallic Denim. This is a semi new palette. This one is very, very pretty so it's Tom Ford's Wet Dry Formulation so you can use the formula Wet or Dry and it's just really pretty, very easy to work out. Again, another great smokey palette from Tom Ford. I love this formula which is why it's ranking on the higher end. I love this pop of grayish blue and this neutral taupe. Another quad that I really, really enjoyed. This one came out with Rose Prismae the one that I did not like at all and then I like it now. I've always liked this one. Number four is one of the brand new ones that you can still get. I highly recommend it if you love a shimmery eyelid. This is the Tom Ford, obviously, quad in Lava Luster and it's just a quad of a brand new formulation that just came out and it's Tom Ford's best glitter formulation yet. I hope he never goes back to his old glimmer formulation and only uses this because it is so stunning, so metallic, so glimmery, super sophisticated at the same time. You have some duo chromes in here as well so this is the perfect palette to reach for when you need a little bit of shimmer just to pop on the eye. It is perfection. I know Beautylish right now, maybe not right now when this video is posted but hopefully it has their gift card event going on where if you spend $100 they'll send you a $20 gift card and you can spend multiple of hundreds and then they'll send you multiple of $20 gift cards. This is something that I would totally recommend you looking into because I believe these were limited editions so once they're gone, they're gone. Number three is First Frost. This is from the Holiday Collection. I believe in 2020 and this is one of Tom Ford's most beautiful palettes that he has ever launched. I love this formulation and I love these colors.  I don't know, I just really love this one. It's one of his best. It's absolutely beautiful. You can no longer get it but if you're able to find it somewhere, totally pick it up if you're interested, it's stunning. Number two is Daydream. This is one that I cut you guys, a lot of you guys to buy because they were on super sale for such a long time but this is one of the prettiest, most unique purple quads ever. It's one of my favorite purple palettes ever. I do not have a purple palette that has these particular tones of purples and not only that but these purples are done so well. Again, it's a wet dry formula. I don't know why Tom Ford doesn't just have this formula. It's phenomenal. They blend so easily. They look so smooth. It's the easiest purple eye that you will ever get. Highly recommend this if you're into purples. It's something worth searching for. I'm telling you and you don't even need to pay a full price for it because you can totally find it for $44, $45. All right, that brings us to number one. It is another brand new quad but in my opinion, Tom Ford has not shot himself in the foot with this one. This is the Metal Lust Palette and I just need every palette to be this formulation from now on. So it's that new glimmer formulation that I was talking about with Lava Luster and then you just have two really, really solid mattes. They're those matte formulations that are so smooth and creamy and they're so versatile because you can apply just a little bit to get a lighter crease color but you can also use that same color and build it up and it literally looks like multiple shadows on your eyelid. This sold out super fast. It's really hard to get a hold of. I don't even know that it's available anymore but if you also like cool tone neutrals which is my color story of choice, I know you will love this. I love cool tone neutrals. So this is the ideal everyday palette for me. It's the Tom Ford palette that I felt the most excited about in such a long time and the formula is king. So there we have it, you guys. That was my 2022 rankings of the 21 Tom Ford quads that I have in my collection. If I film this on a different day, they'd probably rank differently. That's just how it went. And I get a lot of flack for buying Tom Ford and also talking a lot of crap about Tom Ford because I continue to buy his stuff but I'm telling you, when I love his stuff, I love his and also it's kind of fun to be able to have some things to talk about on my channel.  It's my job and I have fun with it. If you don't want to spend $89 on a Tom Ford palette, I totally get it but I do recommend if you want to try his stuff to start looking in places like Sacks all fifth and cosmetic company store. That's where I've seen the best deals on his palettes. You can literally get them for 50% off. It's a great way to try the brand if you're interested. If you're not, save your coins. So I hope you guys enjoyed this video and you found it helpful. Let me know your favorite and least favorite Tom Ford quads down below and I will see you guys in the next one. Bye guys, have a good one.


Thanksgiving is the time most often spent counting your blessings with family, loved ones and a pile of food. For service members stationed overseas, heading home for the holidays is not always possible. The Coalition of Sailors Against Destructive Decisions and the Filipino American Association teamed up to bring a home-cooked meal to the single service members at Naval Air Station Ciginella. YN2's Sequoia Champion, the president of Naval Air Station Ciginella's CSAD, says the organization wanted to bring a new flavor to the traditional feast. Thanksgiving to me is a time to be thankful for everything you have and the people you have to share it with. There's so many different cultures and ethnicities, we don't want to focus on one group, want to make it feel like everyone is a family together. The Filipino-flavored dishes served as a reminder to those far from home that their military family is thankful for them and the sacrifices they make to serve. From Naval Air Station Ciginella, I'm Seaman Lukasky.


The U.S. Navy's forward-employed aircraft carrier, U.S. is George Washington, hosted government and business leaders from the Republic of Malaysia. It is really a great experience for me, and I'm sure my fellow officers feel the same way. It's fascinating, very impressive, and to see the ability of the United States Navy. The visit allowed the guest a chance to experience a day of operations aboard an aircraft carrier and an opportunity to train with the U.S. Navy. Every time we do one of these events, it pays huge dividends just with our interaction with our counterparts back in Malaysia. Allowing allies to tour the Nimitz-class carrier strengthened ties with a key Indo-Asia-Pacific region partner. For U.S.S. George Washington, I'm Petty Officer Brian Abel.


looking at opportunities for encouraging more robust development that perhaps we could circle back to. Thank you. Thank you, Jennifer. You're welcome. So we'll put it on a future agenda. Great, thank you. Yeah. All right, so that closes agenda item number two. So we'll now move ahead to agenda item number four, which is the review of the MOU and related to 23 Maple Street. So this is an item that actually has no item. I had hoped that I was going to have material to provide to the board on Friday at a minimum, but I did not receive it from the legal department. Unfortunately, they're still working on an aspect that's sort of important to the MOU, which relates to the Verizon lot and parking for vehicles, particularly for staff. They want to use the parking that is right adjacent to 23 Maple Street just for visitors so that we don't have people coming and parking on Maple Street itself. So in order to do that, it's going to take a little bit more time is my understanding. I'm hoping that I can definitely be back on the 15th with something. So I put it on the agenda with the hope that it was going to move forward, but that's all I have for now. We are still working on a lot of details related to what we need to do at the property to get them moved in, just so you know, but in terms of the MOU, that's where it stands. Great, thank you, Jenny. You're welcome. All right, so we will now move to agenda item number five, which is open forum. So this is an opportunity for any member of the public wishing to address the board to have the opportunity to speak. If you would like to speak, please use the raise hand function, and I will call on you in the order that the hands are raised. Okay, first speaker will be Steve Revolac, and I'll remind everybody that you will have three minutes. Please identify yourself by your first, last name and address. Hello, Steve Revolac, 11 Sunnyside Avenue. I have a question for the architects on the board. If you're willing to humor it. For a long time, Brick was a very common exterior material for apartment buildings, for commercial buildings, and that sort of thing. And over the past few years, it seems that fiber panel boards, various cementations boards are more the material of choice. And I was just wondering in your experience, what was the motivation behind that shift? I can start, and Ken, I'm sure you can, chime in too, from your experience. I think cost, timing, both that as well as just in terms of what aesthetic is desired by the end user. Those are really the three big shifts that I've seen impact those types of material choices. Ken? I totally agree, it's, let's say 90% cost and 10% loss trade professions. It's very hard to find a good mason, or a good mason company nowadays. Just, they just don't exist anymore. They just, that's a lost profession. Okay, yeah, I was, my own thoughts was that, it does take a while to assemble a wall in little two inch by four inch by eight pieces. So thank you for sharing that. Okay, thank you, Steve. The next speaker will be Don Seltzer. Thank you, Madam Chair. Don Seltzer, Irving Street. Just two short items. One is during the first agenda item for 10 sunny side. One of the members of the public who got cut off and was not allowed to speak earlier, I noticed was a member of the Disabilities Commission. And I believe she had some important comments to be made about lack of ADA accessibility in the unit that was proposed, particularly in the parking and maybe in some other aspects of the building itself. All those apartments are required to be group one under Massachusetts 521 CMR. So that's something that should probably bring up at the next meeting and make sure that there is proper ADA compliance. The other item was just now when you were going over the list of projects that was the really big one is that you happen to skip over is 1207 Mass Ave. And I've noticed that the sale has not been completed yet. The town still owns it. They haven't received any money for the sale and the purchase and sale agreement did specify that it was required that the sale be closed within 30 days of the special permit being issued. So in fact, the developer was here until just a few minutes ago when he left. I had hoped at that time that maybe he could be asked to give a status update as to how he's progressing on this project. Perhaps Jenny knows something more. Thank you. Thank you, Don. So for anyone who was not able to speak, unfortunately we did have to open the warrant article public hearing as advertised. We did remind everybody that they were more than welcome and in fact encouraged to submit any comments written to Jenny who would pass those on to the board. And of course, we do hope that they would join us at the future hearing date, which is the 15th. Any other members of the public? Aaron Holman. I'm not gonna get an answer from Jenny about the hotel. Oh, I don't have an answer for you. Jenny, I don't know if you have any update. I do not have an update. Thank you. Aaron Holman. Aaron Holman, 12 Whittemore Street. I've been attending these meetings for a while and I guess I'll follow what Steve Revelax lead in simply asking a question more about how the board proceeds. I have my own concerns. They typically deal with density, affordable affordability of housing and larger social issues. And I'd appreciate any insight from any members of the board as to how you balance considerations of those against strictly regulatory requirements and architectural design issues. My question is a bit open-ended. However you, any of you would like to answer it. Would anyone like to speak to that? I'd be happy to, but I'd also be happy to defer if Gene or Ken or David or Melissa, I know you're just joining us, wish to start us off. I can tell where I start and where it ends. And that is, we're required to apply the environmental design guidelines and to do what basically they tell us to do within them There are opportunities to look at some of the things that you're talking about. And if you attended lots of our hearings, you see that we have given pushback to applicants when they first come in on things that we think are not within the spirit or letter of those guidelines and the review criteria. And at least for me, that's what one of our major roles is to not go outside our lane and our lane is that. Okay, well, thank you. I'll just add too that I think that really looking at the goals of the master plan of the town, which incorporate many of the topics that you just brought up are also front and center when we consider a lot of these developments in terms of what the uses are that the town has identified are important to the town. Thank you. Great. Thank you very much. I'll just add one more thing and I agree with both Rachel and Gene. But I think if you look at how we've approached various projects over the years, what we focus on within our review of both the environmental design standards and the context in which we're making the decision varies from project to project. And sometimes we're more focused on some aspects and other times we're focused on other aspects and it really depends on the context of the project. So I think that's where our discretion largely comes into it while staying within the spirit of the environmental design standards. Gene, thank you. And I'll just add that if you look at those standards and they're pretty broadly written so we can't do everything. Certainly not everything I would like to do in some circumstances, but it allows us to consider a lot of things. Thank you very much. Any other questions or comments from any member of the public wishing to speak this evening? Seeing none, we will close public comments. Any other items from either Jenny or Erin or members of the board before we take a motion to adjourn? Nothing further from me. Okay, great. Do we have a motion to adjourn? Motion to adjourn please. Second. Any discussion? All right, I'll go through roll call. Ken? Yes. David? Yes. Gene? Yes. Melissa? Yes. And I am yes as well. Thank you everyone that closes our meeting for this evening. Have a good night. Welcome, Melissa. You got a little bit of everything for your first meeting. Great. Yeah, nothing like kicking it off with the town meeting articles. Great. Thanks. It's nice to meet you all. Rachel gave me some time on the phone. Jenny kind of prepped me too. So thanks guys in advance for that and looking forward to working with all of you. Great, thank you. Have a good night. Good night. Night everybody.


Yeah, we decided to take our talents to a new location, man. Take your talents, South? Yeah, make sure it's far enough away where if you came, you was coming here on purpose. Yeah. Yeah.  Yeah. So if somebody be like, man, I was just in the neighborhood. Like, you's black.  We were now full one-way roads to get here. Exactly. That's how we know. Make people move with intentions and purpose. J-O-N, we don't have, we don't have no whole bunch of leisure, man. Look at all these people in here. We gotta get right down to business. It's time to get serious, man. You've been playing all day. You out here thinking that it's a game and these people really want to see what's going on in the black market. I've been calling all around the city trying to get in touch with people. They know how to get in touch with certain people. They know the right people who can put me in touch with certain people so I can be talking to the right folks. This ain't easy. Me and my team and my staff, we have exhausted all our resources. But you know what? I got another resource who keep me in the loop of everything musically going on. And you know him. My partner New Face. Because New Face be everywhere. And he know all about the music festivals, who gonna be where, at what time, who performing with the original tickets. He still print his tickets out. And then he gonna keep them. That's how he live it. But I had to reach out and make sure that we get this man right here on the black market because he doing some amazing things out here on the scene. None other than Jay Carter. So what's the word? What's the play? Man, life is good man. All is well. I appreciate you having me. Look, I got all my notes. I see that man. I'm so professional. I thought y'all were just really just talking. You see that? I know how the intro, yeah.  I'm trying to have my professional listen. Yeah, it got all kind of accolades and highlights, sponsorships. I know everything.  Just let you know we got them good Apple computers. They refurbished, but they knew. They came in a box. They refurbished. That means somebody bought them and didn't use them. Now what's been going on, Jay? Man, I mean right now we're in the thick of it man. So we're playing for our 14th. It's our 14th festival. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Now see, you gotta introduce them. When you say festival, what festival are you talking about? Well one music festival. So one music festival, we launched it back in 2010. Now before festivals was like the cool thing. So I used to have a, I still have a brand marketing company. And back in the day I had a live music venue and a club as well. Always was in love with live music. And honestly probably around 2007, 2008. You know after hitting a couple of lesser hue festivals. Your Lollapalooza's, your Bonnaroo's. You just realized that that kind of experience was not available to us. Folks that look like us. They put our talent up on a stage. But the crowd didn't look like the talent that was on the stage. So really just around, took a couple of years, really just kind of figure out why there were no open air, multi-stage, multi-generational, multi-genre black festivals. Couldn't find them. So yeah, just decided to join forces with my folks and created it man. So we launched it back in 2010. I've been doubling the size ever since. One music festival. One music festival, yeah man. Who was the first head line that you had? Common. Yeah, common. So it's common. De La Soul, it was small. It was, you know what I'm saying, it was intimate. It was almost like a block party. A bunch of different DJ's. Greg Street and Kenny Burns with a host. It was a fun, big-ass block party. Now it's done. He was taking up the whole block. Yeah, we had Piedmont Park. And for those that, because you know, you were worldwide. People looking at this thing. Let them know. So Piedmont Park, if you're familiar with New York, Piedmont Park is our central park. Yeah, most definitely. To have a black hip-hop festival in Piedmont Park is actually a big deal. And it's so fitting, though, in Atlanta, because you were just riding. You hear that. Is that Frankie Beveless? Yeah, just got coming on that phone.  Right. Yeah, that's hard. Yeah, man. I love it, though, man. Because you, like, you had a lot of great artists come through there in the variety of people that you could see at the One Music Fest.  Yeah. It was at One Music Fest. Yep. We didn't realize it was going to be their last performance, but yeah, but it ended up being their last performance. One of DMX's last performance was at One Music Fest. Young Dolph. So yeah, man. I mean, this year, the lineup is crazy. It's Kendrick Lamar, Janet Jackson, Megan Estallion, Brent Fias, Bracentilla, Nelly, Coyla Ray, Thames. Yeah, it's going to be bonkers, man. So we're talking about even having y'all set up a section somewhere. You know what I'm saying? And getting some content, doing some interviews. I need that. I need all that. Yeah. There's a few people I need to highlight that you named over there. And yeah, give me a whole media pass. I'm going to have my notes. All that. We love that. Hell yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. So yeah, we're wrapped. Okay. That needs to happen, though. It only makes sense. Only? Yeah. Stayed for a while. I need a spot to tailgate. I need a home base where I can get back and grab a burger off the grill too and still have my seat. Right. We'll talk logistics later on. That's the young lady right there, the beautiful young lady right there. Oh, she already know then. Yeah. I feel like she understands. Yeah. Yeah. Because soon as she walked in, she said, hey baby, whatever I had, she disarmed me right then.  Most definitely. So what are you taking into next? What's the next play? So I mean, it's funny you asked, man. So we're actually going to expand to Dallas next year Memorial Day. Yeah. So coming to find out, there's really not a whole lot of activity like that either in the Southwest. Okay. And they have a huge, huge urban population. We have some strong relationships in the Houston Dallas area. That's what I'm saying. If you're going to take it to Dallas, you got to go to Houston. It's like right there. It's right there. Right. Yeah. And then this is just like, hey, you know they got money in Houston. Yeah. One thing about people in Texas, they got a lot of money and they don't mind spending because it's real ones. Yeah. Yeah. It's long. So yeah, man. It's just a, it's just an overlooked market, man. So we locked down the location and so Memorial Day next year, I'm going to bring one music first out there. Man, that's hard. Yeah. I'm sure I got it. Okay. Whatever you need, brother. Yeah. We're going to take care of you. Yeah. All of that, man. Because, you know, we're building a brand over here. We're going to have to take it to a whole other level. We're going to have to send some of our on-street reporters. We got staffed and all that already in place. DC, DC jumped on stage back in, was it 21 or 19?  You know, Tigger was on stage hosting and DC just grabbed his mic and yeah, he jumped over. And that's exactly how it's supposed to be. That's right. Yeah, exactly. That's how it's supposed to be. He's supposed to be at a jump on stage and take over and introduce the artists and then he'd be like, DC, no, he is taking over literally. Yeah. That's the type of freedom we need when we come to the One Music Fest. That's hard, though. But keep that going, man, and I'm glad you stopped through here to promote it and let people know where they can get their early tickets, make their reservations and VIP. Where can they go and do all that? The website is OneMusicFest.com. We have sold out of VIP completely. Come on. I know. Yeah.   So, Dan, what's left? We got a few GA and a few GA plus. Regular IP is regular IP. It's getting there. But the date is October 28th and 29th. That's sweater weather. Hoodie weather. Yeah. They ain't gonna be wearing red with them if it's sweater or turtlenecks. I don't want to bring them turtlenecks out. So, weather should be right, though, man. I mean, we used to do it in the middle of summer. Yeah.  People passing out. No, we don't want that. No, no, no. Yeah. We're tropical people, but, you know, we wouldn't take it down a notch if you don't be out there for a whole weekend. Yeah. Yeah. So, yeah. OneMusicFest.com. Still a few tickets left. So, yeah. So, if you're thinking about it, don't think too long. Grab those tickets while you still can. Damn. VIP and the platinum tickets sold out. Everything sold out, bro. Y'all got some single-day tickets coming up, though. We do. Lil' Birdie told you that, man. Yeah. I told you. You got an insight. Yeah. I know that lady. Yeah. She was making me privy to all information. Yeah. Anything else you want to lead the people with before we are? Uh... Because I know you got festivals to plan. Yeah, we got a few things we're planning. But, yeah. This is, I think the biggest thing is, yeah, don't hesitate and definitely grab those tickets if you are considering going. Who be keeping you in the loop with the new shit? As far as music? Yeah. I mean, we got a pretty creative team around us, man.  Be like, uh, listen to this. New shit?   I think it's not one person. But, uh, why? Are you about this new face? I'm just asking.  Because as the young... That's their responsibility. Yeah. All the young guys that's around us, they're supposed to be bringing us this...  That's right. So we'll be, you know, privy to what's going on in these streets. One of our interns over there, Alex, he's got a pretty good air for music, man. Really? He made some recommendations. Okay. Uh, we got an old soul, though.  Right. But, um, yeah, I think that also helps. You know, we typically keep a good amount of young interns around. Um, and some of the stuff that they recommend, you know, you be like, Nick, that's trash. No, I don't want you to know that. You can't say that. You can't say that. Well, yes you can. But some of it, you know, come on now.   He says trash.  We finna crank. Now we finna put numbers behind this motherfucker. This the next one to blow up. How you know that?   But yeah, young folks, man, they keep their heads to the street, man. But, um, we try to more or less look at artists that feel timeless. You know what I mean? Like, there's some young artists that's on the bill. But, you know, they're not one hit wonders. You know, like, like Keeglock is more of a younger, kind of a younger artist, man. You know, I think he has solid flow and material. You know, even some of the R&B acts, you know, that we have on the bill from, you know, Bryce had been around for a minute. But, you know, I think there's some artists, be it hip hop or R&B or, you know, Afro beats that actually make good, timeless music. So I think the demise of a lot of festivals out there is they just go for what's hot right now. You know what I'm saying? So, but if everybody's booking what's hot right now, well, I gotta go to that festival.  So we try to do a different kind of job of curing our lineup. So it is generational, right?  You know what I'm saying? Where they do that at, you know? So that's kind of our model. Yeah. I bet you can't get Kirk Franklin in plies on the stage. I bet you can't. We actually tried. We had Kirk before. But yeah, but there's rumors that they are the same person. You know what I'm saying? But yeah, Kirk killed it though. I know.  Sometime the music begin to, he begin to hype off the music. You know what I'm saying? And people that didn't realize it. Because he be having a snatch of the mic from himself. He be about to cut. Y'all think I'm playing in this music? Oh! Woo! Hey, boy! Hey! Hey! Almost got me. Hey, bring that back. Melodies from heaven. These, these, these, I mean, these. I'm, oh. Yeah. It was, he killed it though, man. He killed it.  Yeah. Because you can still be holy and be high too. That's right. You can. Don't never think that you can't. You're right. The same people seen in church. You seen in the club the night before. Right. That's right.  Yeah. Yeah. I think they should, that's the way the club should close. On a good gospel song. All right. Last call. Never. The whole thing to play the whole song out. Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. That's hard though. But look, man, I wish you much love and success on all your future endeavors. We appreciate you stopping through the black market. Make sure you got all my info because I'm going to need my section because I'm going to need to go back and forth.  Somewhere. We need a tent. And all right. Yeah.  I mean, it's Atlanta. Yeah. Yeah. And white people have been showing us now we didn't took it to the next level. Next level. Hell yeah. Because you know, they usually show up at five in the morning. The black people tailgating. We pulling up Saturday night. There you go. Right. The game ain't till Sunday at eight o'clock. We already parked at seven. 72-inch screen. All that. All of it. Lobs and tails.   We ain't parking in tennis.  No tickets at the game. No ticket. Ticket's terrible. Sitting right by the concession stand, ain't it? Terrible. Sitting up there high in the field gold net. Well, you can see over the net. Yeah, you too have. Even know who playing at this point. But look, I got to ring this bell and let them know. The black market is open. Hey!


Principles of Systematics, module number one, first of all we will cover basic terminologies of Principles of Systematics, our first terminology is taxonomy, we can define that taxonomy as theory and practice of classification of organism, basically taxonomy two words first word is taxes which means arrangement and second word is greek word which means nomos or nomos arrangement or laws basically in taxonomy we arrange organisms into different groups and subgroups caroless lineus introduced the term taxonomy, it is also called father of modern taxonomy caroless lineus, swedish, botanist, zoologist and a maher position they divided organisms into different categories, according to them we can divide organisms into three categories similarly they introduced the system of binomial nomenclature and hierarchical classification in binomial nomenclature we give a name of two parts, first part represents its genus and second part represents its species caroless lineus said that we can divide all organisms into three categories and all organisms can easily be adjusted in these three categories among them the first category was animals, second category was plants and third category was minerals our second term is classification, classification is basically arrangement of organisms into groups and subgroups based on the similarities and differences they have basically in this we divide organisms into different groups and subgroups based on similarities and differences because of classification the study of organisms becomes very easy and convenient we can divide organisms into different groups on the basis of different factors for example we can divide organisms based on nuclear membrane for example nuclear material has a definite nuclear membrane absent whereas eukaryotic cells have a nuclear membrane, it is bounded by a definite nuclear membrane similarly we can divide organisms based on number of cells we can divide organisms based on number of cells similarly we can divide organisms into various groups on the basis of mode of nutrition many organisms are herbivores who feed on plant matter many are carnivores who eat meat similarly some organisms can consume plant and animal matter, we call them omnivores similarly many organisms feed on detritus matter, we call them detri-vores similarly we can divide the organisms on the basis of body organization many organisms have silo, which is a body cavity if all these characters are present in an organism we call them true silo and in such organisms we call them silo mate and in such organisms these silo don't exist, we call them as silo mate and some organisms have silo in them but if the characters are not complete then we call these organisms as pseudo silo mate or false silo mate and this total is called father of classification basically he made many groups, many categories for organisms he divided organisms on different basis on different groups for example he classified organisms based on the presence of blood or absence he divided organisms based on two footed or four footed similarly he classified organisms based on hairs or feathers similarly he classified organisms based on shell or shell absence but unfortunately he failed to give any consistent system of classification


My name is Mackenzie Tamell when I say go I'm a recruit officer with the Denver police department You're gonna hit your person right across the eyes, and I'm about to get pepper sprayed go.  It's difficult to open them. They start to tear in water There's a lot of mucus and spitting and crying and tears Because your body is trying to push all of that substance out So the purpose of this training is to let us understand what that type of pain feels like So that if we need to use pepper spray or OC on the street We know that we're using an appropriate level of force for the situation It's a worthwhile training experience. I would say good job


Somehow, again, at the House at Pooh Corner, and we have an exciting innovation happening here at ORCA, which is three different people on a Skype call with me from California and New Jersey, and they're rather crucial to the events happening in our time. Because they are with the Lawyers' Committee for a 9-11 Truth, they have done petitions and supplemental petitions to the grand jury in New York City, trying to explain to them the likelihood of certain causes and results having to do with 9-11, and we will be talking to each of them who will be explaining what their different roles have been in these petitions to the grand jury. We have Barbara Honiger, whom I met many years ago in Montpelier. She's from California, and I will tell you a little bit about Barbara. Served at high-level positions in the U.S. government, including White House policy analyst, special assistant to the assistant to the president and director of the Attorney General's Law Review at the Department of Justice from 95 to 2011. Ms. Honiger served as senior military affairs journalist at the Navy Postgraduate School, and she was in that position when we met her here in Montpelier, and the premier science technology and national security affairs graduate research university of the Department of Defense, her pioneering book October Surprise on the Deep Story behind the Iran side of the Iran-Contra scandal, subsequently confirmed by formerly classified documents. Well, anyway, you get the picture that Barbara has been in the trenches for all these years regarding the truth of American activities having to do with 9-11 and Iran-Contra, and we also have Richard Gage, whom I interviewed several times over the many years on my radio program, which was also called the House of Poo Corner, and Richard Gage is the head of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, and he has been focused primarily on the demolition of Building 7, but also on the techniques of demolition that had to do with Towers 1 and 2. So he's with us today, and someone I have not met, David Meiswinkel, is the president of the Lawyers' Committee for 9-11 Truth, and he will tell you a little bit about himself because I don't know anything. So let's start with David, the chair and president of the Lawyers' Committee, and give us a little introduction as to the petition and where that has gone with the grand jury and what the grand jury may or may or may not be up to, and I'll even throw out a question right now for you. Who else besides the Lawyers' Committee is contributing petitions and is contributing information to the grand jury? I've read that you're in partnership with other groups, if I've understood that correctly, and it's not just the Lawyers' Committee for 9-11 Truth that is handling the information that goes to the grand jury. So tell us about yourself, and then if you can answer my complicated question. So go for it. I'm a licensed attorney in New Jersey since 1989, a practicing criminal defense attorney for the past 10 years, and I am presently the president of the Lawyers' Committee for 9-11 Inquiry and a board member, and we are a nonprofit organization. You can access us through LC4FOR911.org, also a retired police officer, and a United States Army veteran. As a police officer, I founded a community newspaper, Taxpayers and Tennis Association, which exposed local political corruption, and that led to federal indictments of powerful local officials, and at one time when I was in the police office, I was myself a whistleblower. I have a number of things I can tell you, but at a valuable time. So I won't, other than that presently, as you mentioned, there was a grand jury petition that was submitted in April of 10th of last year, 2018, and an amendment was submitted. This is to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District in New York. This is where Ground Zero is, is where the big buildings are, the big high rises, World Trade Center towers, and other important buildings in that complex. That's where that aspect of the crime happened. And in that area, the U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Berman, he received from us a petition requesting a grand jury investigation. There's 52 pages, and it was 57 exhibits that are very powerful. And I'm sure Richard and Barbara will talk about those exhibits and the profoundness of them. But we have, are working actually with no one other than architects and engineers on a joint fundraiser. And that has been directed towards the grand jury petition to further this cause to ensure that a proper grand jury proceeding is conducted in the Southern District. This will be the first time to our knowledge that ever a criminal investigation into the crimes of 9-11 involving the controlled demolition evidence, the evidence of explosives, the evidence of bombs is being relayed now to the public, and it's being supported. We like to say this positively or conclusively that these buildings came down official story, which was office fires or office fires caused by gasoline from the airplane. That's one of the buildings wasn't even hit by an evidence is there. And as we said, it's dispositive. So we are associated with architects and engineers in another way too. They are the prime establishment of that organization. And that organization is comprised of professionals, scientists, architects, et cetera, researchers, and they don't have an ax to grind. They're trying to present the truth, the physics, the science of the crime. And so we take a lot of their information, their evidence that they've gathered since 2006, 2007, and we've packaged it as attorneys can do. And we've now presented it in the leading USC 3332, which mandates makes it a obligation on the part of the use attorney to present that evidence now to a grand jury, a special grand jury, which will be convened basically to hear the evidence. So that's the significance of architects and engineers. They've gathered the evidence at ground zero. And the significance of working with them now is that jointly on a fundraiser is to gather money so that we can take this grand jury petition all the way and do whatever we have to do what lawyers have to do to ensure that this matter is being so that's a little bit. I don't have to answer your questions there, Jim. No, it does. Thank you. And the big news for those of us in the 9-11 Truth Movement, who sort of began this on day one, the big news is that you have presented this evidence into a format that by law has to keep going. Berman can't just throw it out the window, right? He has a legal obligation to go further with it. Yes, he does. He has a legal obligation. Now, we're supplementing things and we may get into that. Recently, they received from us, the Lawyers' Committee, a summary of persons, companies and entities who may have material information related to the federal crimes of 9-11 as they applied to New York City. And this is fairly powerful information. It's been done in two different, basically, presentations. One is a redacted presentation and one is unredacted. And the unredacted as well at the grand jury hopefully will receive from the U.S. Attorney because we've asked them to convey it. And this will basically provide a roadmap for the lay jurors. Most of them probably will be startled stunned by some of the information they'll receive and look for some guidance as far as how to approach it, how to connect dots and things of that nature. So we've taken that step recently to submit two versions. One version is just for a secret, all right? And that basically is for a number of reasons, but a grand jury proceeding is secret. The other version is public and you'll be able to access that on our website, LC4FOR911.org. And there you'll see basically more of the various categories like first responders who reported and hearing explosions and tenants and visitors who reported it and et cetera. So it's more general and that's for a number of reasons. But that you can access on our website. All right. Well, thank you. Can you give the website slowly and clearly again the Lawyers Committee for 9-Eleven Truth? LC, that stands for Lawyers Committee. LC4 is the spelling that out, F-O-R. So it's LC4911 will help us in this joint effort. It's financially, certainly please access the website and you'll be able to do that. And if you have information, you'll be able to contact us too. If you look at and hit the button about us, there'll be a drop down where you can contact us and share the information you have and give us your number and address or name or whatever you want to do. All right. Thank you. Yeah, it's difficult for those of us who follow this since day one to even imagine that there's anybody left on the planet who thinks that Osama bin Laden pulled off the 9-Eleven Attacks. But there are millions of people out there who are in that boat and it's hard to tell them. It's hard to get the conversation started. And I've even, I don't even know a Ph.D. who looked at the demolition of Building 7 and he said, oh, that's a result of a volcanic reaction to the heat from the center of the building causing the building to collapse symmetrically. And I said, well, except that there wasn't much heat and it wasn't in the center of the building. So you should probably Right. Well, Richard can answer that and he can respond to that well. And I know he's done it hundreds of times throughout the world. He can feel that question with that professor straight. All right. Well, let's go to Barbara Honiger. And you can tell this story from your perspective. And if you want to bring in the evidence of the, oh, no, this, that's the Pentagon. So I was going to say that your claim to fame was the spotting the clocks that had all stopped before the attacks began. But we're talking about. To be fair, I have a lot more than just clocks. Thank you. Yes. Yes. But anyway, that's Washington, D.C. And we're talking about New York City today. So anyway, the grand jury petition and the petition supplement at this point is only about the World Trade Center evidence. Yes. So go ahead. Tell us your part in this effort. The intro for myself anyway, that you mentioned, maybe you did correct me, but I am on the board of the Lawyers Committee for 9-Leven Inquiry and an officer of the Lawyers Committee. And even before I joined the board, which was a little over a year ago and became an officer, I was also for quite a period of time before that and still a major researcher for the group. In other words, I do serious, significant background research for the documents that you've read, the petition and the petition supplement, working hand in glove with our president, Dave Meisswinkel, you just heard from, and our litigation director, Tarny McHarrison. So that's a major contribution. Also, as you know, because we're doing it right now, Dave Meisswinkel, myself and Richard Gage, founder and head of Architects for Engineers for 9-Leven Truth, have been doing these radio shows on our joint fundraising drive for the Lawyers Committee now for a number of months and we're continuing to do that. So we really appreciate any donations, any financial donations to support this critical, critical breakthrough work that the Lawyers Committee is doing, not just for 9-Leven Truth, but after over 18 years for 9-Eleven Justice, real 9-Eleven Justice, as Dave Meisswinkel likes to say, we're inside the castle and we have drawn up the drawbridge, okay? So we're inside the federal government castle, everybody. It really makes a difference. So that's the gist of my involvement, but maybe you wanted to ask a more substantive question. Well, yes, that's an introduction. That's a good introduction to us as to who you are and what you've been up to with this effort. What kind of mandate, that's not the right word, what specifically is your contribution in terms of evidence? If you're allowed, I know you're not allowed to name names, but... Yeah, under, as I called in my research background, there's our, along with architects and engineers work that they've already done over all of these years are the major contributions to these documents. And these documents, the petition is 52 pages long. So people just need to read the petition. And you go to our website again, L-C-F-O-R-911.org. And you, it's obvious where you click to read the World Trade Center grand jury petition. And when you get to that petition, for anyone who isn't already an attorney or in the legal profession, I highly recommend you immediately fast forward or scroll forward to page 21, which is before that it's all the kind of legal context, citing the statutes and all of that. So page 21 begins the evidence section. And in the evidence section, you will see references to our evidentiary forensic evidentiary exhibits. And those are hyperlinks within the petition. So you can click on any of those evidentiary exhibit hyperlinks, it goes straight to the 57 evidentiary exhibits that are of course, part and partial of the petition. So that's important for people to know. People just need to read the petition itself. But to more specifically answer your question, I'm very excited and actually very personally proud that I was able to succeed at this. The petition features amongst all of the other evidence that architects and engineers, of course, has been making public for many, many years. It also features, in a major way, the critical smoking gun facts. In addition to the smoking gun of World Trade Center 7, there are two other major smoking guns that are added and featured in the petition. And that is that many people don't know, even in the movement, because it hasn't been emphasized before, but it is in the petition feature that there were massive deep basement explosions in both World Trade Centers 1 and 2, in both twin towers, before a plane hit either tower. Now, anybody can figure out, even if they're only three years old, that it is impossible for a plane or any hijackers on a plane, even if they were on the planes, and there isn't good evidence of that even, that the planes and the impacts of the planes and the fires they're from could not have been the cause of massive explosions in the deep basements of both towers before either plane even physically hit the building. And we have in the petition the analysis and seismic evidence from the official seismic records that prove this, that 14 seconds before the plane hit the first World Trade Center tower, the first attack of 9-11, the actual first attack of 9-11 was a massive deep basement explosion in the basement of World Trade Center 2, at least at the World Trade Center 2 level or below, probably the level basement 4 level out of 6 levels, and 17 seconds before the plane even hit the World Trade Center 2, there was a massive deep basement explosion in World Trade Center 2, and back to World Trade Center 1, there was also a massive explosion in the lobby of World Trade Center 1 that killed Bobby McElvane, Bob McElvane's son, as he was about to go into the glass enclosed main lobby of World Trade Center 1 before the plane even hit above. So these are two new critical, well they're not new, they've been true all along, but they are for the first time featured in a major way, in a major document for 9-11 Trues, and now architects and engineers, Richard Gage has done a very fine approximately 15 minute video that he could tell you about, about this that goes into even greater detail that is in the grand jury petition for World Trade Centers 1, 2, and 7. So that was a major contribution that I made in terms of the substance, but of course there was a lot else. So that answers, should answer your question. Thank you, and so my next question can go right to Richard Gage, and that has to do with what Barbara just said, the evidence for that lasted for a long time because of the heat, and that was left in the ground, and that was observed and published and put on one video after another. So those of us following what happened are well aware that there was something almost nuclear that must have occurred in order to maintain the heat in that space for so long. So at some point during your talk, Richard, you can maybe get to how that is related to the symmetrical collapse of the building, and one point that I like to say to people is symmetrical collapse cannot occur from asymmetrical damage, and that's awfully simple, and it's short, and it's easy for people to grasp, and it doesn't always mean anything to them when it comes to real life, but it's certainly a simple concept to grasp, and you're certainly in the thick of that one. So Richard Gage, who is the head of architects and engineers for 911 Truth, and been at the nitty gritty of the chemical reactions, the physical reactions, the people on the ground, the firefighters, the first responders, and Silverstein, the owner of the building, Richard Gage has been part of that effort for a long time. So go ahead, Richard. Thank you, Jamet. It's an honor to be on the show. I'm just so delighted that the Lawyers Committee for 911 Inquiry saw fit to organize several years ago and have been working so hard to put together the evidence that we have been assembling now for 12 years and submit it to the U.S. Attorney and actually get a commitment on the part of the U.S. Attorney to impanel a grand jury. This is the culmination of a dozen years of work of now 3,000 architects and engineers.  Yeah, I mean, most of us would, right? This is an incredible array of technical credibility here, combining 25,000 years of credibility and technical proficiency. So here, let's just put this in perspective. I mean, 12 years ago, I was a flag-waving Republican, Reagan Republican, right?  And I walk into a driving my van down the road and I'm hearing describe or interview David Ray Griffin on the radio, and he's talking about all these explosions that Barbara and Dave are referring to, but he's talking about 156 witnesses. Well, 118 at the time, now 156 witnesses of explosions before the towers came down. We're told that these explosions, oh, that's just the sound of the tower come down, but no. But at least half of these witnesses, dozens and dozens and dozens of them say, no, the ground is shaking under my feet, like a train running down there, and heard these explosions, and then the tower starts coming down. It's very clear the order in which these things are happening. It's incredible. So I'm just blown away. I'd never heard anything like this. Five years after 9-11, there were no architects and engineers that were organized. So we put this material together with the help of Stephen Jones, David Ray Griffin, Jim Hoffman, many others, fine researchers back in the day who were well underway. You know, even the day after 9-11, many of them were aware. So now we've got then, Stephen Jones came out in 2006, identifying the residue of thermite, then incendiary used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. He identified this early on as spheres, iron microspheres that were found in all the World Trade Center dust, actually by the US Geological Survey. Very clear in all their toxicological studies, they find these previously molten iron microspheres. Well, how did they get previously molten? In other words, how did they get the temperature of 2800 degrees where iron begins to melt? How did they get to be iron in all the dust samples? This is not steel. This is the actual elemental iron. Well, iron is one of the components, iron oxide, one of the components of thermite. So we're talking about aluminum. Also, the other component, this is found in these spheres by the USGS by RJ Lee, but they don't identify the source of it. They're just confused. It's called the greatest mystery, according to the New York Times uncovered. And then FEMA, when they produced their 2002 report on what happened at all three World Trade Center skyscrapers that collapsed that day. In Appendix C, they do a metallurgical examination, citing hot sulfur corrosion attack on the steel, liquid molten iron invading the steel. The ends of the beams partly evaporated, according to the FEMA author Jonathan Barnett, a fire protection engineer. Well, how do you evaporate steel? That's 4000 degrees Fahrenheit. That doesn't happen by office fires or even by jet fuel, which is just a hydrocarbon. It doesn't burn any hotter than desks or chairs, 600 degrees Fahrenheit maximum, according to its manufacturer, ME Petroleum in open air. So where do these extremely hot temperatures come from? Pools of molten iron seen by the first responders, the structural engineers, the iron workers, the firefighters are saying like a volcano flowing like, I forget the exact, it's absolutely extraordinary, these quotes, the structural engineer of the World Trade Center himself, Leslie Robertson, documents a river of steel flowing. Well, this doesn't happen until you get temperatures 2800 degrees. Where does that come from? Thermite issues molten iron at 4000 degrees and above, because there's found also by the USGS molten molybdenum, and this material takes 5000 degrees to even begin to melt. So you see here we have the formation of more than 12, about 12 years ago now of all this forensic evidence, which is damning evidence that could show exactly what happened. But then a couple of years after that, we have even more damning evidence from a team of eight engineers led by eight scientists led by Niels Harrod, Stephen Jones, and others. And they published the results of this in a peer reviewed paper in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal. They found red, gray chips, red on one side, gray on the other. Extraordinary, they come up to a, they are attracted by a magnet. And so they determine that through zooming in with an electron microscope that they have nanoparticles of iron oxide and aluminum powder, the ingredients of thermite. But at the nano scale, a thousand times smaller than the diameter of a human hair. So they get really curious here and determine, do some research, find that Los Alamos lab, Lawrence Livermore lab has developed this stuff prior to 9-11 and they termed it super thermite because it's a way to engineer incendiaries to become more explosive. So we have both incendiaries and the evidence of explosives at the World Trade Center. And so the evidence of explosives is key in that after four seconds, when the top of each of the Twin Towers begins to telescope down on itself, four seconds after the beginning of the collapse, there's the complete collapsing of the upper sections of these towers. After that, we have explosions, additional explosions heard by first responders. And then we have laterally ejected freely flying structural steel sections weighing four tons at 80 miles an hour out of the towers, laterally. That takes incredible explosive force, high energy explosives, in this case, landing 600 feet in every direction, such that none of these steel sections are found at the bottom, or very few of them. There's like a two-story pile as all at the very bottom inside the perimeter. And so what's crushing the building? If 95 percent of the structural steel is ejected well outside the footprint. And by the way, the concrete floors to 90,000 tons of concrete in each of these towers is pulverized to a fine powder and distributed throughout lower Manhattan in a three square mile area, about three inches thick. So that's not stacked up like pancakes at the bottom of what we're told is a gravitational collapse. So if if the steel's not at the bottom of the pile and the concrete's not at the bottom of the pile, what's left to crush these buildings? That's most of the weight of these buildings themselves. So these simple to understand intuitive pieces of evidence and eyewitness and video testimony is very revealing of what really happened here at the World Trade Center. And guess what? It's just the beginning of the content in the 57 exhibits that the grand jurors are going to see if they haven't already. Their jaws are going to be dropped when they see all of this incredible evidence. So we're ready to rock and roll. And that's why we're fundraising because the attorneys have to have the wherewithal to submit these amendments to the petitions, the motions to keep the U.S. Attorney honest, and the additional research that has to be done and the credentials of the experts have to be put together and packaged so that they can see that and call them in as experts in this crime of the century that's now in trial, not trial, but investigate grand jury investigation. Yeah, I would like to add just to give a kind of a big picture frame for what Richard has just given us in the evidence. Just maybe one sentence here. And that is that what this means all of the evidence that Richard has just presented that is in the grand jury petition you can read on our website, lc4911.org. And that is that that is all evidence for the pre placement, the pre planting of massive quantities of incendiaries and explosives throughout the World Trade Center towers one, two and seven. The latter not even hit by a plane. The latter having come down by classic control demolition and the World Trade Center towers one and two coming down by non traditional, non classic explosive control demolition. All of this is evidence for the pre planting of explosives in all three buildings, which means at a very minimum, at least weeks before 9 11, they were pre planted if not months, which completely, completely rules out the official story on yet another line of compelling absolute evidence that the official story cannot be true that planes and any hijackers on the planes that the impact of planes and fires there from could have possibly been the real story of what happened to destroy all three high rises. Okay, I have a follow that up National Institute of Standards of Technology, which is basically mandated to do an investigation, their investigation scientifically. They chose the least likely hypothesis that fires brought the buildings down or fires caused by airflame fuel and towers. But this had never happened before ever. Fires have been in high rise steel structured buildings. They don't collapse. They can't because the temperatures needed to melt steel cannot be reached. You need at least another 1000 degrees. These are the soft steel. Yeah, just to clarify that point, a softening steel, which is what fire those fires do, don't even cause the collapse. But as we mentioned earlier, there's evidence of melted steel much higher temperatures. But go ahead, Dave, you're right on. Right. But the is that the forensic evidence would be gathered at the crime scene. And the police would have a protocol police officers are taught the first thing when they get in the academy is to protect the scene and to make sure that you retrieve the proper evidence before you discard it. Now that was not done valuable evidence. Studying that steel that was a carded off chopped up and sent overseas. Thank you. So they want to investigate explosives and sin theories that might be present to cause this incredible catastrophe that we have never seen before. And that wasn't done. So right from the beginning, you had the hypothesis being the least likely that had never happened before never happens since that fires or office fires or office fires caused by jet fuel caused the buildings to collapse in possibility. And the most likely hypothesis that control demolition could accomplish this was never considered. Right. Well, we can thank Mr Giuliani for prohibiting a proper investigation in New York City because that seemed to be under his command. But I have a quick question for actually maybe all three of you. You remember good old Mr Manning of fire engineering and you know whom I'm speaking about, right? Bill Manning is the editor in chief of fire engineering magazine. Yeah, he made his engineer. He made his original statement about the joke of a of an investigation. I don't remember it off the top of my head. I read it many years ago. And I did speak with David Ray Griffin. He was asking me to put some evidence together for one of his books, having to do with the firsthand reports that were written up in several fire magazines. And I went to the firehouse and read them and all that. But can you tell us whether Mr Manning has had any made any contribution to the efforts that you're doing here? Manning is quoted liberally throughout our section on destruction of evidence. He said crucial evidence that could answer key questions is on the slow boat to China showing an astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough scientific investigation. That's the quote. And it's worse than that. Starting two weeks after 9-11, the steel was moved to a and put on a barge and shipped to China for recycling for like 15 cents a pound on barges that were already ready to go. So this is like 150,000 tons of steel. It was a huge project. So this has to be investigated as well. This is the illegal destruction of evidence in a crime scene. But four investigators could get their hands on it and do a proper investigation. We only have, you know, in a few sculptures dotted throughout the world, the World Trade Center Steel, that's all that's left. And yet some of the slag from the ends of these beams has been sent to Stephen Jones. He analyzes it and finds the residue of thermite right there in the sculpture still available. Yeah. And I have some photos that people sent me in my documents too. Now, I remember Giuliani when he was questioned about this.  We want to kind of get it out of here as soon as we can, which is a meaningless statement legally. And I don't know if you're probably not allowed to jeopardize. I don't want to jeopardize your who's who in these grand jury, but this was all public. This Giuliani business was all quite public. Are you capable to talk a little bit about that, about his role in this? And yeah, one of the categories with in reference to the summary of persons and companies and entities who may have material information would include the people involved with the removal of evidence. And basically that would be suggested that the grand jury may want to look into that person, certainly that area and start connecting some dots. Okay, so that would be certainly it's a persons who control the premature destruction of 9-11 evidence. Actually, if you look on our summary, which will be on our website, lcfor911.org, page 23, it's actually the 12th listed item that we include there that there would be persons who control the premature destruction of 9-11 evidence. So you could jump into it in that regard. That's right. There may be more specifics given to the grand jury in a secret document or a confidential document that we would present, but to the public, we would keep it general in that regard. And then that would be say a flag to say, okay, let's do some further research in that area and see who or what companies could be helpful in asking. So we're answering that question is to what's the premature destruction of evidence and then why would why could that be and who authorized it, etc. Okay, and that's David talking now, right? That's right. Okay, we want to match the pictures. I'd like to add something to this discussion about the destruction of evidence that should have been saved from the crime scene at ground zero on 9-11 and after. And that is that all of the steel was not carted away, almost all of it was, but we know that of twisted beams and other pieces of the World Trade Center towers, perhaps also World Trade Center seven, but we know the towers were stored at Hanger 17 JFK Airport for years. And out of that warehouse, basically, those pieces have been distributed literally not only across the United States, but around pieces are two of the 9-11 lie all over the world, including and Richard Gage and I drove by this 2018 when we were in Brussels for a joint speaking tour on 9-11 on the lawyers committee work World Trade Center towers on a pep of the new Brussels, Belgium, if you can imagine, a monument to the 9-11 lie. And these are all over the world. And in addition, in addition, if you could believe it, a large quantity, of course, relatively different to China and elsewhere, it wasn't just China, but it was mostly China that got the steel. But a good quantity of the steel from the World Trade Center towers was melted down and turned into the bow of a new U.S. Navy ship called the USS New York, if you could imagine. It's just sickening, isn't it? And I have some of those photos. I have some photos, if you want me to send them to you of the steel. You probably already got them, but if it would help. In my photo gallery, people have sent me photos of the steel. Please forward that to me, Jim. That would be fantastic. I'll get it to the attorneys too. Jim, there was a statement in the report in reference to FEMA. FEMA came and did an investigation prior to NIST. And one of the things they mentioned that was curious and they couldn't explain was a sulfidation of metal. And Richard probably could address that because that's very important. And they wanted NIST to look at it or put it pointed out. And nobody ever addressed it because it implicates extremely high temperatures. And again, Richard may want to comment on that. He's familiar with that. And also with the liquid metal that was down at ground zero, a quarter of a mile underneath the top of the buildings in the basement area, after the event happens, there's liquid metal down there. Okay. And Richard, go ahead. But I also want to throw in several reports from different sources about the supposed gold bullion that was stored under. I don't know if it's true, but I've heard it from different sources. But go ahead, Richard, and answer David's point. Yes, the first responders, the iron workers, the structural engineers, they all find these molten iron pools flowing like lava, they described it. In fact, the South Tower minutes prior to its collapse, you have molten metal pouring out of the South Tower. We know the temperature of molten metal by its color. This is yellow to white, hot, indicating temperatures exceeding 2500 degrees. Well, that only happens not by jet fuel, not by fires, but by something like thermite incendiaries. And the molten metal, again, has been tested by physicists to find the ingredients of iron, molten iron, and then this pouring molten iron also has aluminum oxide ash rising off the top of it. And these freely flying structural steel sections shot out of the towers at 80 miles an hour, they're trailing thick white smoke clouds. Well, guess what? Steel is not flammable at office fire temperatures. It doesn't burn, you don't light a match to the steel and have it just kind of burn. So why are the ends of these steel beams on fire? Well, this would take an incendiary like thermite, which would be issuing as one of its byproducts, the iron, aluminum oxide ash. This is extremely important. There's a lot of evidence that building seven as well, which we haven't quite covered yet. This building is a 47 story skyscraper part of the World Trade Center complex. And it is about 100 yards from the North Tower. And in the afternoon of 9 11, about seven hours after the towers collapse, this building, after witnesses hear explosions, which we cite those those those witnesses, the building drops like a rock straight down uniformly, symmetrically into its own footprint in the exact manner of a classic control demolition. It falls at freefall as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky. Symmetrically, well, that can only happen if you remove all 80 columns at once. If you're off by even a second, right, and those explosions that remove columns, the building will begin to fall over. It'll hang alone. Yeah. Now those and I there was an eyewitness to the countdown and I interviewed him and I have no record of it. I'm sorry. Have you heard about that? Oh, sure. This is Kevin McPad and former Air Force medic. He's moved to about six blocks away from the building. And as they because they're told the building's going to come down because it has structural damage, because it had a few small scattered fires, they called them large. And and so this building, Kevin is listening to the radio held in the hands of a Red Cross worker. And he's he he hears three to the guy said, and he says the building just came down expecting I guess a controlled demolition. So yeah, that's that's incredible eyewitness testimony. And there are others as well. By the way, I want to jump in here and point out that I think we have about five minutes left in the hour. Yes, that's right. Six. So let's if you if you if any of you has anything that you want to round up with and as to the importance and don't hesitate to tell us again of the importance of what you are doing in terms of a petitions to the grand jury and the likelihood of well what's the next step? Maybe David should tell us we should all have a closing statement. Why don't we begin with Dave. Okay, yes. This is a as a nation at a crossroads. If we do not address the worst crime ever perpetrated against our country, that which killed at least 3000 people and influence the entire world. And in other parts of the world killed a million people because of these spin on 9 11. Then as the United States of America, we actually in that sense cease to exist as a free and democratic society. We have shrugged our responsibilities to be educated and to be vigilant. This the scene here in New York City is one of the aspects of 9 11, a very complicated and well thought out plan or crime areas to, for example, the Pentagon Washington DC, and what happened in Pennsylvania, where in flight 93 night of flight 93 allegedly crashed. So it's we we address what the where the evidence is right now. And this is like sort of the tip of the spear in the sense of opening up this process. As we've said, we have been now legitimized because we've been invited into the castle. But in to make this presentation that or the well to give the information to the US Attorney to make that presentation to the grand jury unprecedented. But it is only the beginning.  And they've been lied to in the in the worst possible way. And to let's roll back the situation. Let's protect our Constitution. And let's go back now to the beginning of when this happened. And let's start to put the pieces together. Connect the dots. This is a giant conspiracy. And again, it seems to be probably well financed, and well thought out. And it's changed the whole aspect of our operation in the world, our whole self conception of ourselves. And so it's it's really underlining. It's really important to look at it again. And you can do and you can start it by going on LC for getting familiar with this material. And then talk to your friends about it. And we'll all figure out as Americans how to proceed. But it's one step at a time. And this is a big first step legally, where we are now given credibility. And let's, you know, say some prayers and let it roll. Okay, Barbara Honeger, go ahead. So much again for having us on the show, Jim. Your show and shows like it around the country in the world are what makes a difference. Um, and as you know, nothing really happens in Washington, DC, or in official done in the United States or probably anywhere, unless you have what's called a pincer, I call it a pincer effect. And that is you have to come from the top down as well as the bottom up. So the grassroots knowledge and understanding of the facts and the truth that we were lied to in a Hitlerian big lie about who it's kept our country on 9 11 is critical from the grassroots up as well as the now that we are inside the castle and that the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York is convening a special criminal grand jury for the evidence of the World Trade Center on 9 11. You have to go from the top down in the bottom up. And the bottom line of what we're telling everybody here is that the real perpetrators of the attacks of 9 11 at the World Trade Center and elsewhere, by the way, are not the ones that the government told us the real perpetrators are still at large. They are extremely dangerous and they can attack again if we do not succeed. So please help us donate to the lawyer's committee for 9 11 inquiry. You can do that by going to our website lc for 9 11.org or to the architects and engineers website, which is a 9 11 truth.org. If you go to A and E, please note that your donation is for the lawyer's committee grand jury project. Thank you so much again, Jim. Thank you, Richard. You've got a minute. Richard Gage. Right. Defense Authorization Act subsequently eroded our civil liberties to where today any of us can be arrested merely for being associated with terrorism, which isn't even defined. We can be assassinated even tortured. So all of all of this goes back to 9 11. We've engaged in a $4.5 trillion global war children's grandchildren will still be paying for old history. Now, you know, 18 years ago, society has changed our geopolitical history. We've achieved or they're trying to achieve dominance in the middle valence, et cetera, here at home. So grand agenda of these perpetrators. And so everybody's got to do something. Act on your conscience. Get informed with this material. Hand out the DVDs, the website information to everybody you know, especially every architect and engineer, that lawyer that you can find. It's imperative. We've got to act now. Thank you all for listening to the House at Pooh Corner with David Maslinko and Barbara Honegger and Richard Gage. And maybe we'll do this again.


Greetings, sailors, Marines, and families. I'm Rear Admiral Bruce Gillingham. As Surgeon General for our Navy and Marine Corps team, I want to take a few moments to talk with you about the novel or new coronavirus. This is the virus that was first detected in Wuhan, China and has been in the news recently. Our Department of Defense and Navy leadership have been actively engaged on this issue to help protect you and your family. The guidance and procedures we are following are closely coordinated with our interagency partners, especially the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC. This ensures accurate and timely information is available and all appropriate measures are taken to prevent the potential spread of the virus. Based on the information we have at this time, the overall threat of contracting the novel coronavirus outside of China is low. Colds and influenza are far more common. Navy and Marine Corps personnel and their families who have recently traveled to China should be aware of respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, or difficulty breathing. Should a service member or a family member who has recently traveled to China experience any of these symptoms, they should call ahead to their medical provider to receive additional instructions for clinical care. There is currently no vaccine to prevent the novel coronavirus. The best way to prevent infection is to avoid exposure to this virus. To help prevent the spread of viruses, the CDC recommends the following. Avoiding close contact with people who are sick. Avoiding touching your eyes, nose, and mouth with unwashed hands. Washing your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer. The readiness of our forces and families requires ensuring we are all in the best health to perform our duties and take care of our families. If you do become ill, take the right actions to keep others from getting sick.  Cover your cough or sneeze with a tissue and then discard the tissue in the trash. Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces. And know this, my team is working on this situation as in frequent contact with every Navy and Marine Corps medical department and facility around the world. Every healthcare provider in the Navy and Marine Corps is being provided the latest information and treatment recommendations. If we do what is necessary to protect ourselves and our families, we can avoid illness, stay healthy, and complete our missions. Be smart about your travel, your travel precautions and what you can do to protect yourself and your family. Remember this, Navy Medicine is here for you. If you need help or have additional questions, please contact your local medical representative. The CDC website has the latest and most up-to-date information. Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center website also has information on the novel coronavirus. Thank you for your attention to this important health information. Just as you defend our country 24-7, Navy Medicine will continue to work around the clock to protect you and your families. We have the Medical Watch.


Good morning traders, Patrick Munley here with another tip and I'll draw your attention to developing opportunity in the Dolly Yen, the daily timeframe. We had some positive move off the lows at 1.0250 in January and we're correcting that move at the moment. And it looks like now we should see a break of this trend line support to ultimately take us down through 1.0830 and target an equality objective at 1.0630 versus this swing high here 1.0980. Also, there's some seasonal patterns here that are supportive of Japanese Yen seasonal strength during 20 of May to 23rd of August over the last 10 years, 90% positive. So look for a break of 1.0830 targeting 1.0630. So as traders, plan to trade, trade the plant most importantly and manage your risk. Until next time, thanks very much.


Hello, my name's Pat Lohr and I'm a member of the Edmonton Regional Learning Consortium Mathematics Team. Thanks for joining me today. I'm going to share some information for parents about the revised math curriculum and look at some things you can do to support your children at home. Personally, I have a lot of experience as a classroom teacher, but I'm also the mother of four public school graduates, so I've spent plenty of time on your side of the fence as well. I'd like to take a moment to thank Alberta Education for the grant that made this learning opportunity possible. Here's a question I want you to consider. What kind of mathematics experiences do you want for your children? Should math be all about basic facts, drills, and paper and pencil calculations? It's math. It hurts, but it's good for you. What it really comes down to is this. What mathematics will your children need to be successful in the future? Good mathematics is not how many answers you know, but how you behave when you don't know. This is a quotation that's been on the wall of every classroom I've taught in over the past ten years. Do you believe it? I need my students to believe it, because to me it sums up the difference between students who will successfully tackle unfamiliar problems and those who will be unwilling to even try unless I've spelled out every little step for them. Let's consider a traditional approach to teaching math. First I present a concept and explain it to my students. Then I lead them through one or two examples. Finally, I give them some problems to try on their own. Let's consider an example from my classroom. It's long division. I think everyone has memories of doing long division in school. I do my best to explain the procedure to my students, and we do a problem together. Then I'd give them one to try on their own. Oops, not ready for that yet. So I'd explain it in a different way. Nope, still no luck. I'd explain it a third time only louder and slower. And then I'd put them to work on a page of problems. What I'd see next is a sea of hands. Everyone wants me to explain it to them one more time, one by one. Who's doing the math here? It's me, almost entirely. And here's a little secret. Long division doesn't actually appear in our math curriculum at all. Division certainly does. But there are plenty of ways to solve a division problem. And long division is just one of them. So what's the problem here? I was taught this way, and I turned out OK. But I've watched a lot of students struggle with math over the years. When my kids struggled, I blamed myself for not finding the right way to explain it to them. Or I blamed them for not paying attention in class. Or maybe I even blamed you parents a bit for not helping enough at home. But here's a lesson I've been forced to admit. No matter how lucidly and patiently teachers explain for their students, they cannot understand for their students. Kids have to make sense of the math for themselves. I can't do it for them. The revised curriculum is not new math. These changes have been recommended for years. And they are based on what we know through research about how children learn best. Now in my classroom, I do my best to hand the math power over to my students. I find good problems and activities that will push my students to engage in mathematical thinking. I expect them to work together as a community of mathematicians on the activities, testing ideas, sharing strategies. They're also responsible for justifying their solutions and convincing the rest of us that their solutions make sense. I want them to believe that they have the power to make sense of the math. OK, let's take a quick break to do some math. Here's a traditional task that's bound to look familiar. And if it was your idea of fun back in the day, go ahead, pause the presentation, and knock yourself out. All joking aside, there are students who love this kind of math. If they can do it and do it fast, it can be rewarding because it's safe, predictable, and not very demanding. However, if they can already do it, then doing it over and over and over again isn't really math at all. It's just mindless procedures. And if they can't do it, this isn't going to teach them anything new. Now here's an activity I would use with my class. Take a look at it and consider the math thinking going on in your head. Everyone in my class can take part, no matter their level. It's safe because there are no particular right answers. We can have a great discussion around the strategies for choosing numbers, whether the answers would be greater or less than 500, and which appears might be the closest. It requires estimation and mental math, and those are important skills for our kids. Doing math is so much more than memorizing basic facts and performing paper and pencil calculations. Take a look at this list of verbs. They all come from our mathematics curriculum. This looks and sounds like science, and we get it in science. We expect kids to make predictions, investigate ideas, and explore concepts in science. Now we need to remember that those things are just as important in math. So you're probably wondering, how can you help your child at home? Well, first and foremost, make mathematics part of your child's life. Count knives and forks as you set the table and match them up one by one. Notice patterns on sweaters or on the tiles on a floor. Play games that involve number or strategy. Notice times when mental math could be used, like when you're reading. Wonder how many pages are left in the book. On a road trip, when you see a mileage sign, guess what the odometer will read when you get to your destination. Let them help estimate the amount spent on groceries or make a budget for a pizza party. Notice numbers and statistics in the media and help them make sense of them. Your attitude is critical. Be positive about math. Be interested in what your child is doing in math. Be excited when he solves a tough problem. And be surprised when he notices something new. Help your child by asking good questions. What do you know about this problem? Would using some materials or drawing a picture help you get started? Why have you decided to try this strategy? Does your answer make sense? What else could you try? Could you explain this step for me? Sometimes allowing your child to grapple with the problem is hard. Be part of the conversation, not the one with all the answers. Try to listen more than you speak. Provide a nudge if needed. I wonder if drawing a chart would help with this one.  We want our children to develop mathematical power, confidence, flexibility, fluency, perseverance. If your child is practicing basic facts, focus on the strategies rather than how fast he can do them. Your most powerful question is how do you know that's the right answer? Or is there another fact you know that could help you with this one? If your child is practicing computations, help him focus on the meaning of the numbers first by asking, what will this answer be close to? How do you know? And then let him check the answer to each question as soon as he finishes it. And if there was an error, encourage him to look back at what he did to see if he can discover what went wrong. And finally, celebrate your child's success. Provide encouragement when the going gets tough. Join the conversation. You'll be glad you did. Thanks for spending the past few minutes with me, and I hope I've given you some ideas to help you enjoy math with your children.