a person. You can discover riches as a young person if you discover first truth in your life is the Holy Spirit is not a feeling. He's a person. People don't commit sin because they have flesh. People commit sin because they yield to their flesh. People don't live holy because they have Holy Spirit inside of them. People live holy because they yield to the Holy Spirit who lives inside of them. It's possible to have Holy Spirit and live a sinful life. It's possible to have flesh and live a holy life because the secret of your Christian life is not whether the Holy Spirit lives inside of you. It's whether your life is submitted to him. The secret of living in sin is not having flesh inside of you.  You have a challenge today as a young person in the United States in the 21st century who you're going to be submitted to.  I want this person as we are praying right now asking that you will begin to walk out of your seat and come right here and we're going to pray with you. The God is going to break the chains in your life. If in your heart you agree the Holy Spirit. If in your heart you quench this fire and you say today I want to rekindle that. I want you to come out of your seat and we're going to pray with you. If you have a sickness in your body and we're going to agree right now. We are going to pray.  My lower back was just hurting and I was really confused. In my heart it's just like put your hand on your lower back. Even though it never hurts it was just hurting at that moment. Right now it doesn't hurt at all. I did try to move against it. It's good so for example I have this tension in my shoulders and I go back and I draw a lot and he told me that if I don't get rid of the tension it can break the muscle in my shoulders and I don't know what it feels really like.


I think it's an extension of the classroom really because what we've got here is, in effect, the biggest library in the world. You can get any book from anywhere. The children have got particular interests. But also so that the children can realise that the library has got so much more in it than the internet has. You've got such a wealth of information. You've got most beautiful illustrations. You've got things that the kids can curl up and read. They can tuck themselves up in little areas like that and share books in a way that you can't on a computer screen.


What's up guys and welcome to Trendy Update Sapa SPM Buzz. Now onto the trending news today is musician Bahati who has took to his social media platform to wish his daughter Mueni a happy 8th birthday. Now in case you didn't know Bahati had Mueni at the early age of 22 years and being a girl he named her after his mother the late mom Mueni. Now he says that you made me mature up and since then you are one of the reasons I work hard every day.  In a way Bahati and I wish his first daughter Mueni a happy birthday. Amezakusema my princess is just the other day and I can't believe you are now 8 years old.  My relationship with you might face a lot of challenges but I promise to you that I will always be here for you. No doubt that I will always be on your side to make sure all your dreams come to pass. I am sure that you will never forget that Mueni is the daughter of Bahati and I will always be here for you. They are able to co-parent together and I will always be your dad and I will always be your best friend and happy 8th birthday Mueni Bahati. I am sure that you will always be happy birthday to Mueni. I will always be here for you. Diana will not post her I swear. I am sure that you will never forget her and I will always be happy birthday daddies look alike. Lucy Ann says happy birthday Mueni and I will always be here for you. Roddy and Aliza Mona Diana are always commenting. She always comments that you are the best. Happy birthday to Mueni. My hooks are still intact. It's all about a matter of time. Still monitoring.  I am sure that you will always be happy birthday to Islant's most beloved princess. I am sure that you will always be happy birthday to Islant's most beloved princess. I am sure that you will always be happy birthday to Mueni and I will always be here for you. Happy birthday to my baby and I will always be here for you. I am sure that you will always be happy birthday to Mueni and I will always be here for you. But in the meantime, keep it trendy. Updates Papa SPM Buzz.


Hi everyone, my name is Steph. This is Kiddletjoy and welcome all welcome back to my channel. Today I have a young adult fantasy review and that is for the book Deep is the Fen by Lily Wilkinson. Now I have reviewed Lily Wilkinson's previous fantasy work which is Hunger of Thorns before so I'll leave that linked on the screen but this is her most recent release. It comes out on the 16th of April. I had the best time reading this. I was a little bit unsure initially when I started reading it in the first couple of chapters just because I had to reorient myself in the world. This is a fantasy world that is reminiscent of our world. Things like school and work and cars and things like that. They all exist but also magic exists in this world and magic is very tightly controlled by people and certain magics are outlawed and if you are using magics that have been outlawed you have the potential to be labeled a witch and to be taken away and rehabilitated. In this story we're following Mary who is one of a group of three friends and they've just finished school and they're all about to go their separate ways which is upsetting to her. She wants to make the most of this last summer and it gets interrupted when Teddy who is one of her friends and the boy that she has a huge crush on decides that he is becoming a member of the Toad Men which is a secret society that exists in this world that has kind of outdated views on women and the world and they also dabble in magic and Mary is able to see some magic. She can't work magic but she can kind of see threads of magic in people and she doesn't like what she sees around the members of the Toad Men and so she is determined to stop Teddy from getting involved with them. In order to do that she needs to team up with sort of her academic rival from high school caraway. She doesn't really like him because he comes from privilege and he always seems so aloof and removed from everyone else and she thinks that he thinks he's better than everyone else but he has connections to the Toad Men and he says he's able to help her try and stop Teddy from getting involved heavily in them if she helps him with something and he's a bit sketchy on the details. Eventually she finds out it involves going to an ancient Toad Men ritual in the middle of the Deeping Fen which is kind of like a magical bog and once they get there things kind of go from bad to worse. Mary realises that not everything is what it seems not everyone is telling the truth. Some people can't tell the truth. There are three ruling members of the Toad Men and she doesn't quite know who she's dealing with. She also finds out some secrets about her friends that she didn't realise before. She finds out about the truth behind the witches or the women who have magical abilities and why people have been taking their magic from them. At times it has that really gothic fantasy feeling to it but it is incredibly well written and seeing how Mary has to adapt and grow and learn and trying out smart everyone around her is really fun. This is very much a smash the patriarchy kind of book in the best possible way. It also has the coolest cover. I love this. I think it's very creepy and cool. It really blends those supernatural elements into the story really effectively and I also think it does a really good job of showing that Mary is still a teenager. She thinks she knows everything. She makes a lot of mistakes. She does learn things and she's very smart and she's very capable but she's also only a teenager and only human and I think that's really interesting. I love that there are connections between this and Hunger of Thorns but if you haven't read that it's not going to stop your enjoyment of reading this book at all and I thought it had a very satisfying conclusion while still also leaving a few things open for thinking about and questioning at the end. So I will leave a link down below where you can find that more information about this book. I did receive a review copy from Ellen and Unwin and I thank them very much for that because I have really really been enjoying Lily Wilkinson's foray into fantasy supernatural storytelling. I think she does an incredible job of we of weaving these stories together and creating really fun engaging stories. So as I said I'll leave links to everyone down below so you can find out more information about the book. If you have read this book or any of Lily Wilkinson's other books feel free to let me know and have a chat to me about them down below. Otherwise feel free to leave a frog emoji to let me know that you're here. I hope that wherever you are in the world you're staying safe and healthy and I will see you in my next video. Thanks so much for watching. Bye everyone.


New video, so, if you know me, you all know I love Christmas. I love it, I love it, and it gives me that buzz. Christmas is one of my favourite times of the year, so I actually can't contain my excitement. I am so excited for December and all the Christmas content, let it be known, I have got so many videos planned for December, I'm actually going to try and upload four videos a week throughout the whole vlog mess, book mess, whatever you want to call it, so that's what I'm going to be doing in December for content, and yeah, I just can't contain myself, so we're going to start with some Christmas content today, basically, and I'm going to be giving recommendations, book recommendations, based off of Christmas movies, and I've got six Christmas movies I'm going to be giving recommendations based off of, and they are my six top favourite Christmas movies. The best, maybe, the best Christmas movies in the entire world. I couldn't really think of any other Christmas movies I would class as my favourite, and I wanted, like, this video to be me chatting about my favourite Christmas movies as well as these book recommendations, so that's what we're going with. I'm not going to be recommending Christmas books, because I don't really read Christmas books, I haven't got many books I would class as, like, Christmas-y books, I don't really do that. I'm kind of going to be, like, if you enjoy the themes and the plot of this Christmas movie, if you like this Christmas movie, read this book, essentially, is the idea. So let's just get into it, I don't know what to start with. Okay, this is one of my best recommendations, probably my second favourite Christmas movie of all time, is Love Actually. I love Love Actually. I just think it's such, like, a gorgeous story, and I love, I love films that have all those little different stories throughout. I feel like, though, no film has done it as well as this. Like, there was that New Year's Eve one, there's been, like, Valentine's Day, like, they try, they try to replicate Love Actually, and they just can't. It took me a while to realise that, that you wanted to be me. My love, Colin Firth, is in it, who I just love so dearly, like, I just love him, like, I just love, oh, listen, his storyline is a bit dodgy. We'll just ignore that, we'll just ignore it. Emma Thompson's storyline, and Alan Rickman, never sees his story, we cry. I just think it's such a good Christmas movie that has joy, but has, like, you know, some more serious elements and more, like, sad elements to it as well. I think it's got a good, kind of, up and down flow to it. So I absolutely love Love Actually. My recommendation for this is Spot On.  No one can touch me. If you like Love Actually, you need to read Blackout by Donnel Clayton, Nick Stone, Tiffy D Jackson, Ashley Woodfolk, and Thomas Nicolayoune. It follows, like, a very similar premise, where each of these authors have written individual stories of these individual love stories that happen during a Blackout in New York. So it's very similar, where you've got all these different love stories, but that kind of join up to one another, like, you know, in Love Actually, like, some of the characters are related to other characters or no other characters. That happens in this as well. Like, there's little links between all the different stories, even though some of the characters may not know each other. Maybe this person knows this person's dad or this person's brother, and they're all kind of, like, meshed together. I really, really love this. It's not very long. It's only about 250 pages, so it's a really quick read. And I really loved getting introduced to all of these characters. I thought each of the stories had such different elements. You know, there were such different love stories throughout it, you know, like, such different representations for different kinds of love. It's just, like, a beautiful little love story, but it's literally the same format as Love Actually. I've connected the two dots. You didn't connect shit, but I've connected them. Most of the authors have written, like, one short story, but Tiffany D. Jackson's story is called The Long Walk. That's told in, I think, about four or five parts. And what's really clever is, like, at the end of that part of The Long Walk, which is these two characters having to walk kind of a long walk across New York to get home because, like, the subways aren't working and stuff, they will spot a character from the next story and then it will go into that story. So that's how it's all linked, and I really, really loved it. Next film I want to recommend based off of is Nativity, which is a very British Christmas film. I don't know if it's, like, had any success abroad, but basically it's this film with Martin Freeman in it. Wait, Love Actually has Martin Freeman in it as well. He must really like Christmas films, iconic Christmas films. Martin Freeman has an iconic Christmas film touch. It's basically the story where he's like this kind of grumpy teacher and he ends up putting on a Nativity show, musical show, and it's, like, really fun. Like, it's just these kids singing, like, Nativity songs and it's just, like, so, like, feel good and so, so cute. So a book I want to recommend based off of this is Me, My Dad and the End of the Rainbow by Benjamin Dean. So this doesn't have a show in it. I feel like the plot isn't, like, super similar. But for me, when I think of Nativity, I don't necessarily think of the plot, but I think of the joy that our film has. Like, it's one of the happiest, most joyful, most fun, the most, like, enthusiastic films. And that's how I feel about this book. This book is just filled with so much joy and love and acceptance and happiness that I just feel like they're very similar in my mind. Our main character Archie's parents have just split up and he doesn't really understand why until one day he sees a pride leaflet fall out of his dad's pocket and it's for, like, the pride parade in London. And he and his friends decide to go and, like, figure out what is happening and try to understand his dad better through going to this.  And that's literally what this book is. Like, it's so happy and such a beautiful book for kids to read. I just, oh, I just love it so, so much. So if you haven't picked this up, and this is, like, a release that came out at the start of the year, I would definitely recommend trying to pick this up in, like, the end of the year because it's just so beautiful and joyful and lovely. Next, another one of my all-time favorite Christmas movies is The Santa Claus. I love The Santa Claus. I just think it's such a good film. It's, like, my favorite representation of Santa in the Christmas films and, like, the elves workshop. I remember being, as a kid, being, like, obsessed.  I actually can't wait. I actually can't wait. Well, guess what, people? I get excited about small things. But, like, I remember being so obsessed with, like, the elves workshop and how it all looked and, like, how it worked and thinking, oh, my God, this is so cool. So I absolutely love The Santa Claus. I love all The Santa Claus films. I'm gonna have to watch all of them. Oh, my God. I'm gonna watch so many Christmas films. And I feel, like, with the first Santa Claus, the appeal is kind of him being thrown into this situation, which he has, like, no idea how it works, being pretty clueless, having no knowledge, and having to figure it out as he goes along. That's the kind of, like, plot arc. That's what we follow the character doing. Him trying to figure out how to be Santa, how to do this, how to not let the world down. And so my pick for this is Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir. If you think about it, it's spot on.  You're so clever. Oh, my God, you're so clever. In this, our main character wakes up and he has no memory of who he is, or why he's there. He is on a spaceship in space, and his two crewmates are both dead. And he, like, literally does not understand. He's like, what the heck? Who am I? I don't know. And his memory starts coming back to him, and he realizes he is on a one-man mission to save the human race. There is an extinction-level threat to the world, and he has been sent to figure out how to solve that. So I think it's very similar in that we follow this character who starts off with no knowledge, trying to just figure it out as they go along, trying to figure out what is happening. And I absolutely loved this. I thought it was incredible. Like, it's such, and weird just how it's incredible science fiction. It makes it so easy to follow, but like, it's talking about complex science, but it talks about it in a way that you're like, huh, like, huh, okay, like, huh, okay. I feel like I know what's going on. I feel like I'm very clever. Another new release this year that I would just, oh, my God, you just need to read it if you haven't already, because it was so good. Like, even if you don't read sci-fi, pick it up, because like, it's not the kind of sci-fi to be scared of. Okay, so next, I can't control myself any longer. I thought about leaving this to last, but I can't control myself. My all-time favorite Christmas film is Die Hard. Huh? What? Okay. I love Die Hard. Here's the thing. In terms of like, my usual film choices, action films are not it, right? But Die Hard, I would say, is my second favorite film of all time. I love bad 80s, 90s action films. My two favorite films of all time, Die Hard, favorite Christmas film of all time, second favorite film of all time, and Con Air with Nicholas Cage is my favorite film of all time. I love it. I love it. I love it. I love it. But like, none of my other favorite films are like in that genre, just those two. And then my top two, because here's the thing, modern action films suck, because it's all CGI.  I want to see someone up against it. Con Air and Die Hard, are just like realistic. I just want realistic action if I'm going to read that. So anyway, I'm sure you all know the plot of Die Hard, but basically our guy, he is traveling to see his kind of wife for Christmas at this like Christmas party that her company are throwing and he gets there and a terrorist like takes over the Christmas party and is like killing people. He is on a one man mission to save everyone. It is him up against everything else. Him just trying to figure out how to stay alive, trying to do everything he can to just survive another hour to get these people down. And my recommendation for this is no exit by Taylor Adams. Now, let it be known, this actually takes place on December 23rd. So this is technically a Christmas book. Our main character is traveling home to see her mother for Christmas. Her mother is dying and so she's like trying to get there in time, but she is snowed in and she has to stop at this service station where there's like a few people there. There's like, I think four people at this service station and she finds out that in one of the vans in the parking lot, a girl is caged up in a cage. And the thing with this book is not like a who done it. We find out very early on who we can't trust just like die hard. And then the rest of the book is Derby just trying to do anything she can to stay alive and save this girl for another hour, for another two hours till maybe someone can get help, maybe survive the night. You know what I mean? It is so good. I say this often. This is probably one of my favorite thrillers of all time.   I like it though.  I've never had as visceral as physical a reaction to a book, to a thriller as I have this. My heart was pounding. I actually don't know if I'm ever gonna be able to reread this. It's so tense. You're always onto the next thing, always onto the next threat, trying to survive, trying to think about how to do it. It's literally die hard. Like it's literally the same and that's why they're both impeccable, one of the best things ever. Many of you know how much I love this book. It was one of my favorite books that I read last year and it was just amazing. Like it was so good. I haven't really gotten over how good it is. Like it's so tense and horrible and insidious and oh, it's just, I hate it, but I love it. Next film is Home Alone, another classic. I feel like Home Alone is most people's like one of their favorite Christmas films. I feel like it's so, so good. Obviously everyone knows he's Home Alone. He's stuck at Home on Christmas. His family left it out to him. He's trying to like, it's like having fun, but he's also trying to take down these villains that are like encroaching on him. And my recommendation for this is gonna be Pages and Co, Tilly and the Book Wanderers by Anna James. So in there, she's not alone, but she has figured out how to travel, how to book wander into her favorite novels, basically. Her grandparents own a bookshop and she can like travel into these books as well as characters can kind of travel out of them and meet her. So when she goes into these worlds, she is kind of like on her own trying to figure out what to do. This is just such a magical, fun middle grade.  I will also say at the end, there's a really good kind of face-off and battle between her and the villain. And it reminds me a lot of Home Alone, how she's kind of able to like out-trick them and fool them. It's such a joyful series, but I haven't continued on with it. I do own the second one and I haven't continued on. So I do need to do that at some point. As we know, series are a problem. I've only started new ones since I filmed my series video instead of finishing them.   Yeah, it's not what we'd all hoped for. And then my final favourite Christmas movie is Elf. I love Elf. Another classic, I feel like Elf is always up there as one of people's favourites. Now what I love about Elf is we're following this character who feels like they don't fit in. He's kind of reached a crossroads in his life, and now he's looking for something else. In Elf, he's looking to find out who his dad is and he travels to this kind of unknown world to kind of meet his dad and figure out who he is. Yeah, I feel like that kind of element of not fitting in and not being happy where you're at that point in life and doing something to shake it up is what I'm recommending this next book based off of. And that is Honey Girl by Morgan Rogers. So in this, our main character has just finished her PhD. She goes out to kind of drunkenly celebrate this in Vegas and she ends up getting married to this woman. Throughout part of the book, they're kind of getting to know one another.  We should kind of figure out if we like each other. She flees her life trying to find a job, all of that, to go and live in New York with her wife. It's pitched as a romance, but it's more of a romance. We're really following this character as she's at this crossroads in her life and she doesn't really know what to do or where she wants to go or who she wants to be. And it's so heartfelt and it's so poignant. And I feel like a lot of people can relate to the burnout that Grace is suffering in this book. And it was just another release this year that I really, really loved. Okay, so that is all of my book recommendations based off of my favorite Christmas movies. I think I actually was spot on for some of them. I think I was actually spot on. Let me know down below what your favorite Christmas movies are and recommend me a book based off of that Christmas movie in the comments if you can think of one Also, if you've gotten to the end, comment the Christmas tree emoji because I am just so excited for Christmas. Like I said, I have got so many good videos and series lined up for Christmas that I am just so, so excited for. I am so excited to get started on filming some of that. I'm hopefully going to get started this week on some of it. And yeah, thank you so much for all your support. As always, I love you so much and I will see you very soon in another video. Bye!


Good afternoon. Welcome everyone to the pre-application webinar for the Diversity Centers for Genome Research. Just to give you what we're going to be talking about, we will go over the goals and objectives of the FOAs. We will then talk about the eligibility criteria for both FOAs. I'll give an overview of the full-scale FOA, which is the U54, and then an overview of the phased. FOA, which is the UG3, UH3, will also talk about the application submission process, and then there will be plenty of time for questions and answers. So a little bit of background about why we developed this initiative. As we all know, the genomics workforce is not a reflection of the U.S. population, but we do know that diverse investigators bring innovative ideas and increase objectivity and research. And minority serving institutions have shown to award 25% of all science PhDs and MDs and health profession degrees to black and Hispanic students each year. So we've developed these FOAs to enhance diversity in genomics research. The goals of the objectives are enhancing that diversity by establishing genomic centers at minority serving institutions with the mission to serve historically underrepresented populations. And these centers will carry out innovative genomic research studies. The centers would also foster genomic research career development and enhancement for trainees and investigators at all levels, enhance the genomic infrastructure, computational, analytical, and ELSI research capability of the institutions, as well as establish sustainable partnerships and disseminate resources and findings. So I am going to spend a little bit of time about the eligibility criteria for these FOAs. The applicant institution must be domestic, so it must be a U.S. institution, and it must have received an average of less than 50 million per year in NIH total costs and less than 25 million per year of R01 total costs of NIH support for the past three fiscal years. The institution must also award a doctorate degree in the health professions or sciences related to health and have documented historical or current mission to educate students from any other populations that have been identified as underrepresented in biomedical research. And this is defined by the National Science Foundation. If there is not a documented historical or current mission to educate students at the institution, the institution can have a documented record of recruiting, training or educating and graduating underrepresented students is defined by NSF. And if that institution delivers health care services, it needs to provide clinical services to medically underserved communities. So the diversity research center is just given the overview of the program. Applicants that have developed genomic capacity in infrastructure would be able to come in for the full scale genome research center opportunity.  And in order to move from phase one to phase two, you have to meet milestones that would be set in phase one, as well as submit an administrative application that will be reviewed administratively. If those milestones are met and your review successfully, you would then go on to phase two to be a full scale genome research center. If those milestones unfortunately are not met or if you're not reviewed successfully, we hope that the funding for the phase one and the activities that you do in phase one will still prepare you to be successful for other RFAs or other R1 opportunities or either other opportunities for funding from other organizations. So I am just going to give you an overview of our U54 RFA, that's the RFA HG202026. Budget limit for the full scale center is this 1.1 million direct cost per year for up to five years. And that full scale center includes an administrative core, the genomic workforce development core, a community engagement core, two to three interrelated genomic research projects that address critical issues in genomics. And then you also have to have an external advisory committee and you can have an internal advisory committee as well. And the center would need to have an evaluation plan to evaluate all the activities of the center. So the administrative core provides the overall management of the center that includes administrative, fiscal education, training and scientific activities. It fosters the synergy with the other ongoing genomic career development activities at the institution. And it develops and monitors the core and project milestones, including evaluating each proposed activity or core. The genomic workforce development core provides genomic research experiences, career development opportunities and education enhancement activities to the students, fellows and investigators in order to develop or enhance their expertise in genomics. It develops creative approaches for recruitment and retention of individuals from diverse backgrounds, as well as takes advantage of the unique aspects of the research project that I'll talk about later on. The investigators at the center's talents and other institutional resources. The community engagement core facilitates the engagement of the community in all aspects of genomic research and this includes development of materials for genomic education and training, research design, analysis, outcome assessment, data sharing, as well as translation and dissemination of study results. The research projects should be structured. The center will be structured around the two to three research projects. So all the activities administrative core, the workforce development core, as well as the community engagement should all be structured around those two to three research projects. And those projects should address one or more critical issues in genomics and that includes genomic technology and methods development. The genome structure genome function genomics of disease the use and impact of genomic information and clinical care. LC research the ethical legal and social implications of genomics research genomics and health equity data science and or computational genomics. And those centers should bring together different areas of expertise and approaches to provide synergy and allow each project to accomplish more than it would be able to on its own. So going on to the companion FOA the face approach the UG through UH three FOA and that's RFA 20, RFA HG 22 027 for the UG three phase, the budget limit is 300,000 direct costs per year and you can request one to three years. The activities in phase one include enhancing of plans for the organization implementation and evaluation of a full scale genomic research center that includes plans for providing the research experiences of courses all the course that are involved in the full scale. You would recruit and retain relevant faculty and trainees in order to carry out the activities of a full scale center you perform training on any software and equipment needed for the projects. You'll test and implement the protocols and procedures as well as identify and provide solutions for any logistical problems that could be foreseen. And we encourage at the centers that will be awarded in phase one we encourage collaboration with the full scale centers the awardees of the U54 opportunity. So the criteria to advance the phase to includes identification, the commitment of the faculty and staff for center cores and the proposed projects completion of training for all planned software and equipment assessment of mechanisms proposed for regular communication coordination among investigators. The external advisor committee review and approval of all procedures and protocols successful achievement of the defined milestones for phase one potential for establishing a full scale genome research center so we'll evaluate your potential of actually carrying out the activities that you're proposing for full scale. If we're encouraging results of genomic capacity building activities that you do in phase one in the appropriateness of your research and equipment space we will do a site visit before you move on to phase two determine that and then also as always the availability of funds. So, for phase two, the budget limit for phase two is 2 million in total cost per year for four to five years successful awardees will apply their plans for force for the full scale center including the refinement of the proposed approaches and tools that occur during phase one. And in phase two centers will carry out the activities of a full scale sooner, including all the components that I just talked about them that are listed for the U54 full scale center that includes the administrative core, the genomic workforce development for the community engagement core as well as the two to three research projects you carry out all those activities in phase two. And I want to point out the total length of the UG three US three awards so that's both phases cannot exceed seven years and that's why the phase two is four to five years and that depends on the length of your phase one. So, I just want to talk about components that apply to both funding opportunities. And that is the evaluation plan each center must have an evaluation plan and in that plan the metric should include include increased collaboration, the development of additional research projects analysis and tools, increased submission of genomic applications to NIH or to other organizations, publications and presentations enhancement of capacity for conducting genomics research at your institution, the institutional commitment and collaborations that you have will look at the number of students trainees investigators from different systems that are exposed to genomic research, and then the trajectories towards successful genomic research careers and your progress of your research projects. The advisory committees, each center must have an external advisory committee and that's for either FOA that you come into even in phase one you need an advisory committee as I said, the advisory committee must consist of at least six members from target communities and external scientific advisors with relevant expertise. The responsibilities of the external advisory committee includes evaluating the progress of the center, evaluating the protocols and procedures, assessing recruitment of faculty and trainees and plans for capacity building, assessing the solutions for logistical problems and reviewing analysis plans and outcomes. The center may also have an internal advisory committee with members that are not like not directly supported by the award, but this is important to point out that this is optional you do not have to have an internal advisory committee, the external provides ready you do have to have that you can have an internal advisory committee but those members cannot be supported by the center. So, both FOAs offer funds for equipment so the grant will provide up to 500,000 in direct costs for genomic technology and equipment in addition to that overall cost cap. And this will occur only in year one of the award period for the phased funding opportunity UG three UH three applications that funding would occur in the first year of phase two. So, even if you do receive phase one award, your equipment funding will not be given unless you reach phase two and it'll occur in your first year of phase two. I'm sorry, there was a question in the chat about can for research projects be allowed or is or three projects the maximum allowed. Three is the max we can talk about whether you can have different aims within one project that is that is allowed but only it's two to three three is the max. Thank you. So resources include we're not limited to and this is for the equipment budget. Those include laboratory equipment supplies statistical and viral bioinformatics software, including computational equipment and cloud computing resources. So collaborations are allowed, but 70% of the budget will need to stay within the applicant institution because we are really trying to build the capacity at the institution. So collaborations are required within the research center and they're encouraged between the centers that are funded for the consortium, as well as other NHGRI consortia. And the collaborations must provide the complete capacity needed to carry out the genomic research projects and the didactic and practical experiences. So, your applications need to have a plan for enhancing diverse perspectives. So applicants must include a summary of strategies to advance the scientific and technical merit of the center through expanded inclusivity. And that plan should explain how enhancing diverse perspectives is viewed and support it throughout the application. I'm ebony. Sorry, there's another question. Do research projects have to be our one level intensive or are 21 exploratory. The research projects can be any scale. They can be smaller or they can be larger. I'm happy to talk with you. And I'll talk to you at the end of this presentation about reaching out to me. I'm happy to talk to you about your project and whether it fits within the scope of what we're thinking. But yes, they can be any scale. They can be a smaller scale project exploratory or they can be the R01 size, depending on your capabilities and the evidence shown. Thank you. So, just examples of the plan for enhancing diverse perspectives is the plan should include a plan to enhance recruitment of women and individuals from groups traditionally underrepresented and biomedical research workforce. They should have proposed monitoring activities to identify and measure that plan and the progress benchmarks. The plan needs to the plan to utilize the project infrastructure to support career enhancing research opportunities. The plan to develop transdisciplinary collaborations that require unique expertise or solicit diverse perspectives to address research questions. Plan could be to for outreach and plan engagement activities to enhance recruitment of individuals from diverse groups as research participants, including those from underrepresented backgrounds. So these are different examples of plans to enhance diverse perspectives that can be included in your application. But please don't think this is just the limit. You can have other plans. And we can discuss that further. So we will have consortium meetings. The centers are expected to meet as consortium with other awardees twice per year. And during those meetings, you'll present your research progress, discuss any challenges that you have and promote collaboration amongst the centers and share best practices. The centers are encouraged to attend other research consortium network meetings as well to increase to increase collaborative opportunities. So I am just going to talk about the specifics of the Institute's research interest. So, as you know, there have been other institutes that are jointly collaborating on this FOA with us on these two FOAs with us. I'm going to talk first about NHGRI's specific interest. For NHGRI to fund the center, the projects may include applications to a particular disease area. But because NHGRI is disease agnostic, they should demonstrate that the methods and knowledge generated are generalizable. The studies focused on disease etiology or outcomes should examine the role of both genomic and non-genomic contributors to human health and disease. If the focus is in clinical genomics, it should improve assessment or outcomes in all populations including underserved populations and include technological or computational methods for the production or analysis of diverse data sets. In all applications, regardless of focus, should explain how generalizable or broadly useful and transformative the findings and approaches will be to the field of genomics. And I am going to hand it off to Jonathan to talk about the National Institute of Mental Health's interest. Thank you. The National Institute of Mental Health is interested in research programs that examine the contribution of genetic and genomic factors to risk and resilience in psychiatric disorders in ancestrally diverse minority health and health disparity populations. I'd like to expand on that on the next slide with four points. First, NIMH is interested in discovery of genetic variants associated with serious mental illness in ancestrally diverse and understudied populations. The interaction of genetic and familial risk with environmental factors that may influence the development of serious mental illness, including genetic risk for suicide is of interest. We're interested in deep clinical characterization of cohorts from diverse minority populations and a collection of a minimum set of common data elements is expected following an NIMH notice. And finally, LC research to address a range of ethical, legal and social issues for individuals from underserved communities that are underrepresented in psychiatric genetics research. And with that, I'd like to turn it back to you, Ebony. Thank you. Thank you, Jonathan. And so I am just going to tell you about NIMHT's interest. The mission of the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities is to lead scientific research to improve minority health and reduce health disparities. So NIMHT encourages genomics projects that use approaches encompassing multiple domains of influence. Multiple levels of biological, behavioral, social, cultural, environmental, physical, environmental health system. And multiple levels of influence, including individual, interpersonal, family, peer group, community, and societal to understand and address health disparities. And I'm going to turn it over to Elena, who is going to talk about data sharing. Ebony, I will be going over the current NIH and NHGRI expectations with regard to genomic data sharing. To comply with the genomic data sharing or GDS policy, NIH expects investigators and institutions to first develop and provide a plan for sharing genomic data in the resource sharing plan of one's application. In addition, applicants must provide an institutional certification document before the notice of award if working with human data to assure that submission of large-scale human genomic data is consistent with the NIH GDS policy, the informed consent of the original study participants, and the preferences of the original study population. This document also outlines any limitations on future data use as deemed by an IRB or Equivalent Privacy Board. The NIH GDS policy expects genomic data to be shared in a timely manner to an appropriate repository. There are specific data submission and release expectations with certain milestones to meet ahead of publication. And the last two bullets on this screen relate to expectations of data users. So the policy expects that users of large-scale genomic data will make use of data responsibly and in accordance with the NIH Genomic Data User Code of Conduct, as well as site data in publications and presentations appropriately. Next slide, please. The NHGRI as an institute that is rooted in the ethos of data sharing has several additional expectations pertaining to the sharing of large-scale genomic data. Where the NIH sets a minimum bar for the number of participants to trigger applicability of the policy, NHGRI does not have a minimum threshold and finds value in the sharing of smaller data sets. So if applicants consent, NHGRI expects explicit consent for future research use and broad data sharing, no matter when the samples may have been collected. Therefore, if applicants would like to generate data with legacy samples where submission of genomic data into a data repository or that secondary downstream use of data was not a feature of the informed consent, then please provide justification for using those samples and seek an exception to this expectation. Additionally, we encourage that studies generating large-scale genomic data consent participants in such a manner or use samples where participants were consented in such a manner that allows for broader forms of data sharing, for general research uses through controlled access, and avoid restrictions on the types of users who may access the data to maximize the number of ways in which the data can potentially be utilized down the line. We recognize that this is not always appropriate. It's our general encouragement, especially for projects that are creating data resources for the broader scientific community. But it's important to note that we will and do approve plans for more limited sharing when there's justification for this. And finally, NHGRI has aligned our timeline for submission and release of non-human genomic data, for instance those generating data from model organisms with the slightly more aggressive expectations for submission and release of human genomic data, with the goal of making these data rapidly available to the greater scientific community. Next slide, please. This particular funding opportunity announcement also encourages applicants specifically to get feedback from the communities in which the research will be performed regarding plans for sharing individual level data, resulting from the research projects with the scientific community for research purposes, and to integrate that feedback and those recommendations into the center's data sharing plan. My next slide, please. You can learn more about the details of the NIH genomic data sharing policy at sharing.nih.gov and learn more about NHGRI's specific expectations on genome.gov's page for genomic data sharing. And there you will also find some key documents for data submission and frequently asked questions. I'll also note that our webpage will be updated very soon to broaden our information in light of an upcoming NIH data management and sharing policy, which will be effective on January 25, 2023. And again, grantees and applicants can learn a lot about the upcoming policy on sharing.nih.gov. I hope that was helpful, turning things back over to you, Ebony. Thank you, Alayna. And I just want to highlight Alayna's point of what is in the both FOAs, that we are encouraged and expect you to work with your communities, engage your communities in developing that plan for data sharing. And as she mentioned, if your community does not agree with NHGRI or NIH's policy, you can request exceptions for what is expected in data sharing. And I am happy to talk to you about it, or I can give you Alayna's information. And so please, we really are encouraging you to engage your community to get an understanding about how comfortable they are with the data sharing policies and whether you should stick with those policies in sharing your data if you do come in. So going to the review criteria, we do have our deputy director of the division of extramural operations on the call here to answer your questions. He's also a scientific review officer. I want you to pay close attention to the review criteria as you develop your application. And please note that the content of that application will be judged against this criteria. So please pay close attention to that criteria and make sure that you're including all those components that will be reviewed. So for submission, before you submit, please, please, please schedule meetings to discuss your potential application and your proposed research projects with me or any other program directors that are listed in the RFA. I really encourage you to reach out to us. You can reach out to us as many times as you need, as many times as you would like. We're here to answer your questions and give you as much guidance as possible. And make sure that you include all required components that are listed in the FOAs and give as much detail as possible. We know that there are page limits but give as much details as possible within the limits that are set. The first application due date is December 6. Please do not wait until the day of that the applications are due to submit your application. You will often deal with errors in submission. And unfortunately that there are no exceptions, even if you started to submit on that date, your application has to complete the submission by that date, not just have started. So we encourage you to start that submission early. And then try again. As you know, if you're not successful on the first try, some people may not be. We are wish all of you luck, but please think about resubmitting. There are additional receipt dates for both FOAs and that's in June of next year and then a year later. And so we do encourage you to please resubmit if you're unfortunately not successful in the first round. So we are envisioning that successful diversity centers for genome research will carry out innovative genomic research studies. They'll foster research career development enhanced students. They'll enhance institutions genomic research capacity. They'll enhance the genomic infrastructure at that institution and they'll enable the investigators to be successful in obtaining competitive extramural support for genomic research. As well as establish the same partnerships with relevant stakeholders to increase collaboration. And lastly, successful centers will disseminate those resources and findings that were developed during the center funding. And these initiatives align with the NHGRI strategic plan and the diversity action agenda. It maximizes the usability of genomics for all members of the public. It champions a diverse genomics workforce, as well as embracing the interdisciplinary and team oriented nature of genomics research. In this, on the action agenda, these centers will develop and support training programs and networks that connect undergraduate and graduate education to careers in genomics. As well as develop and support training career development and research transition progress to lead to independent research in clinical careers in genomics. I would like to thank you all for attending this pre application webinar. These are the contacts for the funding opportunities. They're all so listed in the RFAs and most of these people are here to answer your questions now for grants management. We have our grants management officer, Dana Ingersoll, who is here to answer all the grants management questions. So happy to answer any questions that you have. And I am going to stop sharing so I can see your faces. So we do have a lot of questions in the Q&A. So the first question that we have comes from Pamela Park. What are the conditions required for the infrastructure? Are there criteria listed somewhere to look at? And is it in phase one or two? Can you repeat that? What is the, I'm sorry. What are the conditions required for infrastructure? I'm assuming infrastructure building are there criteria listed somewhere to look at? And is this required in phase one or two? So, and I'm going to ask the person if I'm if I'm not answering your question to please clarify in the Q&A. So you in order to come in for the U54 opportunity, you need to already have that genomic infrastructure to carry out all the activities of the cores and the research projects for the phase one and phase two, the phased approach. You can be building up your infrastructure and developing that infrastructure in those one to three years in order to carry out. So by the time phase one has finished. So, for instance, if you come in for three years at the end of those three years before you go into phase two, we expect you to have the infrastructure to carry out all the activities of phase two. And please let us know if that does not answer your question. Okay, we have another question. How do we reach genomics research? Does it mean researching using genomics data only or does it include other omics like epigenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics? It does include other omics, but I really encourage you to reach out to me or the other program directors to talk about your research project to make sure that it is a fit within the institute's interest. Okay, we have another question. Is there any expectation to include pilot projects or allocate some funds to support several pilot projects during this award to support other investigators in the institute? So, I think you probably know a lot about the RCMI centers that support pilot projects. This funding opportunity does not support pilot projects for other investigators. It just supports the two to three research projects. Okay, we have a question about data sharing plans. For the data sharing plans, would these requirements each be addressed by a unique plan for each of the three research projects, assuming that the projects will have different participants and different needs? So, and Elena, you can help me with this answer. If there are different plans for each of the projects, then yes, it needs to be a different plan. But if you expect to have the same plan for all three projects, you can make sure that you clarify that and say we will have the same data sharing plan. And then you can just summarize what that plan is for all the projects. Elena, is that okay through our office? Yes, that's I think what I would have said that you can describe your plan in the resource sharing section of the application either way, depending on whether it's sort of applicable across the entire project or different amongst the sort of sub projects or individual projects. All right, there's an NIMH question. Do genomics research projects have to be on mental health related research? Yes, for NIMH, we support the study of genomic contributions to mental health traits, a wide range of them. And so please feel free to reach out to Geetha Centiel or to me to discuss any possible projects that might overlap NIMH interests. I will want to follow up that you don't have to have every project be a mental health project because we jointly fund a lot of things. And so don't feel that if you do have a mental health, all the projects have to be in one disease area. We do jointly co-fund centers. And so, again, as Jonathan said, please reach out to us to discuss. For the requirement that applicant institutes, I guess what they're trying to say, for the requirement that applicant institutes are doctorial granting, do those degrees need to be research based doctorial degrees or do degrees such as doctor of physical therapy and doctor of nursing practice qualify the institution to apply? Yes, they have to be doctors in health sciences or research so that does qualify the institution. Is this the first cohort of centers to be selected for this RFM? Yes. That was the easy answer. This is the first time that we have issued these two FOAs. Okay. The next question. Can we involve community college students in the training of undergrads? Yes. Yes. You can involve community college students. You can involve high school students or middle school students in the training, elementary students. So all levels of students can be involved. They don't have to be enrolled at your institution. Okay. We have another question. The projects should be related. Is that correct? Yes. The projects should be related. They don't have to be. And we can talk. I would love to talk offline about what you mean, but they do have to be related in some way. But yes. Well, the two to three research projects last five years for the U54 or do you expect other investigators to join the ongoing projects as the original investigators rotate off if they give follow-up funding? Yeah. The projects proposed need to be projects that would occur within those five years. So they need to come to completion within the five years of funding. We don't expect there to be a follow-up on the project. You need to have some outcomes and analyses at the end of those five years. Okay. And it looks like the last question we have so far, but please send in more questions. What is the total number of pages that are needed to write for the UG3-UH3 program? Do you need to have at least six pages per each core? Not for the UG3-UH3. I think the page limit is 30 pages for that one. The U54 has a number of pages per core, but for the UG3-UH3, you have a 30 page limit total for the entire application, including both phases as well as the activities of the core. We do know that's a lot less than U54, but please note you can expand on that when you come back in to transition from phase one to phase two in your administrative application. Okay. Our next question. If our biology department does not award PhDs, but other departments do, are we biology still eligible to apply? Yes, you are. Ebony, I would just like to make a comment because there seems to be some concern about degrees and whatever. And I think it's fair to say that NIH does not discriminate against people who might not have a PhD. What really matters is whatever project you are planning that you have the demonstrated expertise to carry it out. Thank you, Betty. So this is very important. Yes, thank you, Betty. And just to introduce Betty, she is the NSRI Director of Extramural Operations. I mean, for instance, you can have a master's level person who has 2030 seminal publications. That person would definitely be qualified to submit an application. So you really have to show what you can do. And before we go, Rudy, would you comment on the application in which PIs may have external and internal committees and whether they should name these people in the application? Because I think that could compromise perhaps potential reviewers for you. So could you speak to that, please? So I can certainly describe the NIH policy in general, which says that you can talk about an advisory board, whether it's internal or external. You can talk about the roles of the individuals that should be on the advisory board. You can talk about how you plan to communicate with the advisory board, how you plan to use the information that they provide to you. You're not supposed to identify the individuals in advance. Now, Ebony, I will admit that I don't know if there's specific language in the U54 RFA that says they are allowed to do that or they're encouraged. No, there's not. I'm sorry. You should not have any contact with any individual in advance saying, I'm going to submit this application. If I receive an award, I would like you to serve on the advisory committee. And the reason for that is I may contact that person and ask that person to serve on the review panel. And he or she will already be in conflict, not just with your application, but all of the applications. So if every applicant were naming six or eight individuals to serve on their advisory board, there'd be 50, 60 people that would just be taken out of possible recruitment for the review panel. So describe the advisory board, its activities, how you're going to interact with them. But please don't name individuals. And just to highlight what Rudy said, and please do not reach out to the individuals before award as well. All right. We have another question. And I think you answered this question, but I'm going to reiterate it because maybe the person didn't hear your answer for the U54 application project. Can it be our 21 level? Yes, it can. We have written it where any scale project can come in. It can be our 21 level project. But as I say, and I can't say it enough, please reach out to us and talk to us about what you're proposing. And we can really let you know if that scope is a fit within and if it's responsive to the funding opportunity. Okay, I think this is another NIMH question. Do psychology PhDs qualify for the institution for projects in mental health and biomedical? I'd like to echo what Betty Graham said and say that we don't discriminate based on the background of the applicant, but the degree that they have, but instead are they proposing an appropriate project. And again, Keitha Centiel and I are available to discuss any mental health related projects. And just to clarify, the doctorate requirement is the institution. It has to award doctorate degrees, but the PI does not have to have a doctorate degree. And the directors of the projects, the project coordinated, the project leads do not have to have a doctorate degree. And can I just add one thing? I'm seeing a lot of questions on mental health and I feel like I need to make a plug for the research interest for NIMHD as well. So please keep that in mind that there is interest in variety of different disease and conditions that this program targets. Thank you. Does the Genomics Workforce Corps also support faculty development? Definitely. The Genomics Research Corps supports student, trainee, and faculty development and all career levels. So it doesn't have to be a junior faculty member. It could be somebody in the mid-stage or even senior that wants to do genomic research. So yes. For the capacity requirement, can any aspect of data generation be subcontracted to core service providers in initial years as the equipment is obtained and optimized? Yes. That is okay in the application. As we said, the 70% of the funding needs to stay with the institution, but you can do collaborations. You can subcontract for some of the activities that you're proposing. You can subcontract to organizations such as if you want to do Illumina or to do your genotype and those kind of things. That is allowed as you're getting your equipment up to speed. Or even if you do not want to do your own sequencing for your project, that could be subcontracted out. You don't have to do everything in-house. Another capacity question. Are DNA sequencers allowed in the budget? They are pretty pricey, including training and reagent. Is the budget for equipment flexible or is there a strict cap on it? The cap is 500,000 for equipment. So we can pay up to a portion of that if it's over the 500,000, but there is a cap on the equipment for 500,000. And Deanna, that's probably, did I get that right? We don't have any more open questions, but I do encourage if there are any questions as one just came in. If you do have any additional questions, please do type them in the Q&A and we'll make sure to answer your question. This is another capacity question. For expenses related to measurement in an outside company, will that count as part of the 30% allowed budget outside? Or does that count as part of the 70% budget within the main institute? So you're saying expenses related to measurement. Are you saying measurement of your, like, are you saying measurement of in your evaluation plan? Are you saying your research measures? You're using outside. Right. What, what I take the question as, I maybe shouldn't have read it exactly how it was written, but as I take the question, it's if you contract out that 30% is the 30% that is, that does not have to stay within what is included for the main institution that receives funding. So I guess they want to know, is it 30% of the budget that needs, that can be attributed outside of the institution? So my understanding is, are you asking if you subcontract out your measurement, whatever if you're doing the research measures or whatever, is that part of that 30% that would be yes any collaborations would be a part of that 30%. And if you, if I'm not answering your question correctly, please clarify. And Deanna, if you have anything to add, or I don't know if you've read the question differently. Yeah, it says omics marker measurement. Okay, so if you are looking at the measurement, that part is considered collaboration. And that would be part of the 30%. Can members be prior or current collaborators. The members can be prior collaborators, but they cannot be paid. If you do get an award, they cannot be paid from the grant. And Deanna, if you can explain about per diems and paying them as advisory committee as an advisory committee, that's different than them being a part of your collaborator and they're collaborating on the study as well. That's not allowed. And I'll turn it over to Deanna to talk about paying them for their time to be advisory committees, advisory committee members. So there's no, there's no limitation. I'm going to say this, there's no limitation on paying people who are providing a service. It has to be based on institutional policies and has to be something that the prudent person would pay if they're providing a service.  They have to actually be doing something and providing a service back to the grant. Can I, can I raise a question? Are you saying that I'm trying to figure out whether we're into a conflict of interest situation. If somebody is going to be an advisor to your project. That person cannot be participating in the research. And that's why I'm trying to figure out where that question is coming from. If they are part of the research, they cannot be an advisor. That's clear conflict of interest. And I'm wondering if you mean if they've collaborated with you on other projects, if they're past or current club collaborators on other projects, they can then be an advisor on this to your center. If they're not involved in this in the center projects in the center activities. If they are club current collaborators from another project, or past collaborators on another project, then they can be advisors. But as Betty said, they will be a conflict if they're collaborating with you on any of the center activities that you're requesting funding for. Yeah, but I, I guess I'm also trying to draw a fine line with with appearance. It's not a clear conflict, but it is an appearance. And so I just worry about that part of it. It's a good point, Betty. Just like with the research with the research grant, if somebody is read application of a reviewer is reviewing it. That person has to have a certain distance from the PI of the application. So I would just encourage people to think very, very cautiously about putting someone as an advisor who's been a recent collaborator. And I'm not sure how you define recent, but I think that's important. Okay, we have another question. Can you please describe the general motivation for the recipient institution being a doctoral branding institution, regardless of education level of the PIS slash PDs. That may help clarify the line of questioning. So the reason that we asked that the institution be a doctoral granting institution is we are trying to support institutions that will increase the genomics workforce and increase the. And so in order to have that capacity and for individuals to go into the genomics workforce, we do want the institution to grant grant and doctorates to train those students so they can go out into the genomics workforce. But we do understand there are all levels of investigators that may not have PhDs, but do have the expertise to perform the research. And that's why you do not have to have a PhD to perform the research. Okay, so I'm going to go back to the question because we received another question about it. Can you go over the norms to set up an easy. I'm not sure if that's a better question. I was just typing that I'm about to leave, but can you, can you rephrase that again? Can you go over the norms for setting up an easy. The norms for setting up. Well, I'm not an expert on it, but clearly. You want someone who knows the area. Very well and can provide you the advice that you need to make sure that your project. Is moving in the right direction. So, unfortunately, there are no boundaries for that. A lot of it is just. The experience and making sure that conflict of interest is taken care of that the people you appoint have the right expertise. In, in the area that you're looking for. And again, that could be someone who's more junior or more senior. So, I, you know, I think. The P I has to use his or their best. You know, the best advice that they can give themselves or seek from others about. Whether this person is appropriate. And I have to leave because I have another meeting to attend to, but I'd be happy to answer any questions if you want to send them to me by email. Thank you so much. Sorry. And I do want to point out that the funding opportunities do ask that you have community members as well on your external advisory committee. Our foreign sites allowed. Foreign sites are allowed foreign institutions are not allowed to be applicant institutions, but you can have foreign sites as part of your center. Will the trainees in the genomics workforce core be trained within the projects of the proposal or other genomics related projects. We would like the training to be on top of the 2 to 3 projects that you will be carrying out. But I don't think it means that you have to only use those 2 to 3 projects if you have other projects available for training, but we really would like that training to be on top of the 2 to 3 projects. The center will fund the training on top of those 2 to 3 projects. It doesn't mean that you can't have other training going on at your institution. Ebony the 1 thing I would like to clarify is that they should not be using this project to move students off of an established training program. So someone's already being trained on an established training program in RSA, then they need to stay on that program and not use this one to supersede it. Thank you, Deanna. Great point. I think this is back to the question. Can they be advised or consulted on technology systems or platform setups that not be a part of research investigation? Yes, the advice can be to any aspect of your center. You could have an advisor that advises that and they could have other advisors that advise your research. So it really, you can set up your advisors as you see fit to give you feedback on that. Can we use this grant to expand our graduate program? No. This grant is for training and you can have didactic opportunities that you develop, but they have to be coordinated with the 2 to 3 projects that you're going to be carrying out. So those didactic opportunities needed to be related to those projects that you're carrying out rather than expanding your graduate program. I think this is again about that you stated that they cannot be named in the proposal that is confusing. Can you clarify that please? And I am going to go back to Rudy. Sure. Again, I would encourage the applicants to think about the kind of expertise that they need on their advisory board. And so that should be part of your description. I need someone who has expertise with genomic technologies wet bench. I need someone who has expertise with computational methods. I need someone who knows how to phenotype patients because we're proposing to recruit a cohort to study. So areas of expertise should be described. You can then go on to talk about how you'll use it. How often will the committee meet? What is the information exchange? Are there's going to be live meetings, zoom meetings, phone calls? How will you integrate the advice from the advisors in your research plan? How will you use the advisors to change directions?  But don't name the individuals in the application and don't contact them in advance of submitting your application. And say, if I receive this board, would you be willing to serve on my panel or on my external panel? Because that then invalidates them from me being able to recruit them as reviewers. I hope that clarifies the question. Okay, I think we have one more question, but please continue to send in your questions. Yes, this question is asking if there are international visiting fellows, can they submit the application? Are they eligible to submit for this application? And that is a question for Deanna. Hi, so the applicant organization is who the award is made to therefore they're responsible for determining the appropriate PDPI for any application that's submitted. We can't really answer that question for you because it's up to the applicant organization. Thanks, Deanna. It looks like we have a couple more questions are coming in. If we apply in December, when will we hear about the outcome? So you, the applications that come in in December will go to our May council. So there are May 23 count 2023 council. And at that time, if the funding recommendations go there, the awards will be made after that probably by the end of the fiscal year. So by September 2023, August to September 2023, I would expect funding to occur. And again, that's, I can see if Deanna agrees with that. Sorry, could you repeat your timeline? I said that the applications go to May council. So I would expect funding to occur between August and September of 2023. It just depends. It depends on the institution on what their, I mean, NIMH may have a slightly different schedule than we have. So I can't really say for sure. Yeah. Well, all the things that come into this FOA will be awarded by NHGRI and NIMH and NIMHC will be co-funding the awards. Okay. All right. And let's say we have one more question so far. Can the project PI also be the core leaders such as a genomic workforce core leader? Oh, yes. Yes. That the project PI can also be a lead of one or more of the cords or one of the projects that is allowed. There aren't any more questions in the queue, but I do encourage all participants if you do have an additional question to either contact the program directors from each of the ICs represented or please put your question in the Q&A. And again, we thank you for attending. We'll wait a few minutes just in case. I know it often takes me a little while to come up with the question. So we'll wait a few minutes to see if there are any last questions. But as I mentioned before, please reach out to any of us for any questions you can reach out to us any amount of times. We're happy to answer anything even to clarify. Don't make assumptions. If you're not sure, reach out to us. We can clarify anything as you're developing your application. A lot of times questions come up. So please, please reach out to us. And if we're not the right person, we will make sure we direct you to the right person or get those answers for you. And our contact information is are in the funding opportunities. I am just going to share the slide as well. And these will also be posted at the frequently asked questions. There'll be a slide deck of these slides for you to consult as well as recording of this meeting. So it looks like we do not have any more questions. Again, thank you so much for attending. Thank you for your questions. Thank you for listening. And we look forward to your application.


All right, good Tuesday morning everyone we are on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange with Jim Kramer to talk about the markets and Jim Let's begin with oil plunging. Yeah, no that our target had been 43 And I arrived that because Carly Garner who I regard as being one of the great commodities people of our time who writes for real Money had been saying listen, we're gonna make a stand at 43. Maybe we break it and then maybe we come Bounce back. She says it's going it's going to be pretty messy right here I contacted her of course because when it was at 53 She said it was going to 43 so she has tremendous tremendous credibility in my eyes and I look at it And I say to myself, okay, you don't immediately lower your target if your target was 43 don't start saying this 41 There's a there was someone on this morning was saying hey listen. I think it's gonna trade the high 30s I'm a Carly. I think it makes kind of a stand here, and I think you get a whoosh back Are we also so quite a rebound in tech stocks? Yeah, I mean tech it looks like the seller stopped them I'd like I'm trying to get people to understand the way trading works in which the way trading works is We have these very big firms and they let's say they switch and say we have too much tech Well, you can't just unload tech anymore. What happens is there's a great dislocation because firms don't principle like they used to I had Lloyd blank find on last and he said listen There's there is an issue of intent You can't just go buy all the stock from someone a regulator might find that your your intent is to profit from that When the reality is is that you're all you're trying to do is what's known as positioning in order to make it So that you can then find buyers so some what you can't position anymore So what it's very dicey to position because the regulators might say what are you doing?  It looks like to be the pattern again You mentioned Lloyd Blank find that was a fabulous and you got him to talk about tweeting Yeah, I mean Lloyd is he's done with letting the firm be characterized by others He wants to be characterized by himself three of six by the way have been somewhat critical of the president He said look I reflect the I want to defend the institution now. I've been I've known Lloyd for for 30 let's see 1983 I don't know 34 years and Lloyd is a guy who Represents to me a lot. I mean I just played with an open hand I mean I've known it for a long time. He was very helpful for me in my career It's always very kind to me and it's very hard to say anything like other and good works because they came through the Great Recession Well, but he did say something very interesting He said if you came through a well that means you must have done bad and he doesn't want that to be that kind of defining thing He also explained once again How people are supposed to be committed to public service as part of their job now you could say even that is cynical It's like oh, of course That's to be able to join boards and meet wealthy people and get and then get their business No, is it a virtuous circle? I mean, here's what I say. I Could have made more money had I not had to go do I you know go to community service I yeah, you could have I mean, but that's you know, that's short-term greedy. That's not the way he thinks Also, I mean, let me point out that there are people who do revolving door Like they go work for their company then they go to government they learn things and then they go back to the government go back to their firm and Really profit off what they learned from the government and that's pretty venal The people I work with at Goldman who when went subsequently went on did not go back It was like I did my time I made my money and now I'm gonna go do the great things and that was really another lesson that I learned at the firm Which is that you know, you can make us enough money and once you've made enough money Why don't you go do something good now somehow that's been interpreted as being Goldman having these Octopus tentacles everywhere, but what it really was was the ethos The ethos was you made a lot of money go do something for the government go do something good for the world and a vast Majority of my friends who retired from Goldman and many of them have because they did very good Well are doing these great things Building schools or working in the environment or helping certain charities full-time or Doing things that are great for themselves, but also great for humanity or helping particular causes I could go over and over and over the number of people Goldman who are working Who work at Goldman when I was there who are now doing these great charities or they're working in government minutia Or oh, you know, obviously Gary Cohen who was a friend and I was joking with Lloyd It's like, you know, you want to have I mean, I know Carrie pretty well and you have to call Mr. Cohn or you know, whatever yeah, and I don't like to pretend because I'm not You know, I'm a guy who was a business guy who came into journalism And it's hard for me to act as if I don't know Gary Cohn is when I was at his birthday party last year It's hard for me to say I don't know Lloyd when Lloyd was the only person who was nice to me for the first six months And I was a Goldman. I mean you remember this stuff and and so it's a little more problematic for me to assert myself I know I do it. I want to do what's right for the viewers. I always want to do so I asked, you know, I asked the question about whether the they were fine.  I asked the question wouldn't they do better without the Volcker rule? I do my job But I also do my job within the confines of being conversational not trying to play gotcha because I just don't think there's a gotcha there And you have another big interview coming up tonight on med money with the CEO of IBM Yeah, Jenny Rometti is a person who I think has tried mightily to get IBM to be far more analytical far more cognitive That's what the Watson stand it stands for Artificial intelligence for all the things that we hear about from the great people in tech right now whether be Jeff Bezos Whether it be Mark Benioff whether it be the people run Google and people run fate Mark Zuckerberg the issue here is they've got a big legacy business and how do you Deal with that legacy business which hurts your gross margins and is dropping off and at the same time be able to make Enough money on the cognitive businesses on the you know these special businesses that are growing fast And also how do we deal with the Warren Buffett issue that he decided that he didn't want to be as big although We still owns a lot. How do we how does she remember any deal? Frankly? I'm going to ask her There's so few women it who are CEOs. You know, that's like my kids. I have two daughters And they're saying dad you never have women and I say no, I do have women one I try to have as many women on as possible It's just that there's not many women CEOs and my daughters don't understand that all they say well good dad You just better get them all and and I'm fortunate enough to have Jenny Rometti But I'm also always thinking the back of my mind that my two daughters are saying dad What is it about women that you won't put them on and I have to explain the real situation? All right, that's tonight 6 p.m. Eastern on CNBC Jim also and video was upgraded by Pacific Crest But more importantly your dog Everest I mean, what is it? Why are dogs only have a name one name?  Everest in video and I put a picture up I tweeted him and mr.  He is like 40 different kinds of dog. Okay, but you know what dogs deserve respect So his name is mr. Everest NVIDIA Is bug gonna get jealous?  I don't know I haven't decided what bugs name should be yet, but he deserves I don't know Everest has been so much better to me of late and bug has really shown me so little respect Right now right now. He's fine as bug, but NVIDIA is mr. Everest, you know Everest mr. NVIDIA I have to tell you I'm gonna be with bug tomorrow if he doesn't clean up his act I may not even call him bug. Whoa. Yeah, he's gonna be chief I'm gonna chief him. That's what I do or sport or skipper. He shows me zero respect He's got to stop peeing in a corner there to him. What is that about? Hey, yeah, hey, well, that's a little granular. Maybe too much information bug. Listen up Everest does not ever mr. Mr. NVIDIA would never do anything like that. Never. No, it's just not a stop All right, Jim. Let's also talk about amazon. Hopefully CEO John Mackey loves amazon. Yeah, you know, I mean he hates jenna John though john for a long time John had made so many upgrades and jenna was still persistent when he put ron shake on the board Elevating gabby solsburger to chairman and bringing some outsider cf new cfo And it was never enough for jenna jenna wanted it sold and I think at the end John Mackey said, you know what? I don't need this. I don't need this. I'd rather just hook up with amazon and dominate Uh, I I have tremendous respect for john and what he built. Uh, he built a great institution I love the shop there. I know the numbers have not been great of late But let's have respect for this man who built an amazing institution All right, and then on mad dash on squawk on the street you talked about mcdonnell Yeah, you look steve easter brook. Does he get enough credit? I mean remember when everybody said sell the stock because we've now annualized The all-day breakfast as if you were a one-dimensional character. This is a man who understands the actual Mojo I asked him if I could use the word mojo. He said it was okay to use the word mojo mojo of the franchise ease He's got them energized. He's got them adding shifts. He's got them adding workers. He simplified the menu You no longer need to be from mit or stamp for computing in order to be able to understand the menu Uh, and the changes he's brought great value. He's bringing digital What more can you ask? How about a hundred and eighty dollar target a target price from callan? All right, and then on stop trading you talked about paychecks Yeah, you know paychecks is a company a very high taxpayer the american company But versus doing a terrific job with the float the money that they take in in order, you know, and then they Issue checks they get that little float those days and that's terrific as the fed raises rates But they said but these guys goldman says it's not enough and it's also a question I mean it's almost like they're saying that uh tax reform is also going to hurt economic expansion Because it's not happening. This is a kind of pushback to say what treasury secretary munition saying which is that it's all systems go I'm just not seeing the all systems go friendly What did you make of lennar's quarterly results? Well, I haven't been able to listen to comms call I I saw that stewart miller put up excellent numbers once again lennar and tow brothers have been fantastic stocks They tend to have to go and fits and starts they go up then they shrink back a little bit Then they go up again lennar's got the best numbers in 10 years. How do you quarrel with that? All right, and then jim will end as we always do with earnings to watch we have a few names today adobe an actual arts plus name Yes, now, I mean adobe let me be very very consistent adobe We bought a ton of adobe last time when it reported because people didn't like the quarter and then when they took a deeper look They love the quarter. So keep your powder dry if you don't know adobe I think a better chance could come if it doesn't what can I do? FedEx is also reporting FedEx. I think is I want to hear what they have to say about privatization Now UPS announced the surcharge. I think FedEx gives FedEx a chance to also put through a surcharge for the busy times I do think that FedEx. I wish that they would turn over the air You know many airports to FedEx. They know how to run an airport All right, and then on Wednesday we have oracle reporting oracles consistently made the quarter of late after being inconsistent for a while They have a burgeoning cloud business That larry ellison and mark herds going to talk about Safra Katz met with the president yesterday. She's one of the most accomplished people in silicon valley. I really like these people I think they'll do a good number. The problem is it's got no beta. I mean it doesn't move much But you know what for a quiet stock that's going up quietly where they're buying back a lot of stock That's oracle All right, then we also had one more name chipotle also is expecting some higher cost Okay chipotle, uh, why are people shocked by this? Of course, they're going to expect higher costs I mean they've said it over and over again remember 18 months and then you're going to have What I regard as being a very very forgiving public you have to go 18 months to have a forgiving public though And we're almost there remember december 7th 2015 And once the people have really forgotten then the marketing cost can go down. All right jim kramer We'll leave it there. Thank you so much as always all right for more information on the stocks to mention Please head back to the street.com