It is now time for Oral Questions, the member for Brampton East. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities. My community at Brampton is one of the fastest growing communities in Canada. It's also one of the youngest cities in Canada, filled with families building for a better life for their kids. That's why we were excited at the prospect of a university campus in our community. It was a chance to create jobs and bring educational opportunity in Brampton, and I know that the people of Melton and Markham felt the same way about their plans for campuses. Why did the government break their promise to these communities? Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities. Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the member. I promise the people of Ontario to restore accountability and trust in Ontario's finances. Part of that process means making tough decisions about projects across Ontario. Our government is being forced to clean up the irresponsible and reckless financial decisions of the previous Liberal government. And we now know, thanks to the Independent Commission of Inquiry, the depths of the waste and mismanagement of the previous Liberal government. To describe the previous government's actions, the Auditor General used words like, conceal, bogus, deceptive, and unreliable. In an election year, they made empty promises to Ontarians for programs and projects they knew they could not afford, leading to a $15 billion deficit while hiding the cost from the public. Respond. The Liberals have shattered the trust of Ontarians, and our focus is on restoring trust and accountability. Thank you. Start the clock. Supplementary. Back to the minister, Mr. Speaker. We know that hundreds of people invested significant time and effort moving these projects forward over many years. We also know that significant investment has already been made. The town of Milton estimates they spent over a million on consulting costs alone. York University noted that donors and the York Region had already committed over $42 million, and the province has already flowed $11 million. Yesterday, the minister could not or would not say how much this cancellation was costing. Can the minister tell us today how much the government has already spent on campuses they're now trying to kill off? Thank you, Speaker. And thank you to the member opposite for the question. Our government was elected to restore accountability and trust in Ontario's finances due to the independent commission of inquiry. The depths of the waste and mismanagement of the previous Liberal government are now clear. In an election year, the Liberals made empty political promises to Ontarians for programs and projects they knew the province could not afford, hiding the costs from the public, and creating a $15 billion deficit that Ontario has today. The Liberals shattered the trust of Ontarians, and our focus is on cleaning up the irresponsible and reckless financial decisions of the previous government and restoring trust and accountability in Ontario's finances. Thank you. Final supplementary. Mr. Speaker, back to the minister. We've already seen this government is not very good at planning things, Mr. Speaker. They spent $3 billion not to have a climate plan, and that's what it looks like. They will spend millions to ensure that Brampton, Milton and Markham don't have university campuses. They're not just wasting provincial dollars, they're taking money from universities, from communities and from donors. When will the minister tell us how much this government is spending to kill university campuses and Brampton, Milton and Markham? Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the member opposite for the question. But frankly, Speaker, I reject the premise of that question. It is committed to enhancing financial accountability and transparency. The previous Liberal government, propped up by the NDP, who supported them on 97% of their votes, made empty promises in an election year for programs and projects they knew they could not afford, leading to a $15 billion deficit while hiding that cost from the public. The Liberals shattered the trust of Ontarians, and our focus is on restoring trust and accountability in Ontario's finances. Thank you, Speaker. Start the clock. Next question, the member for Brampton North. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This question is also for the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities. The new campuses weren't just going to provide educational opportunity, they were also going to create economic opportunity with jobs. Brampton Estimated Construction would add more than 1,800 jobs, and Ongoing Operations would add more than 1,500 jobs according to the city. And the PC member for Markham, he said, and I'll quote, in this very room, that Markham's new campus would bring 400 jobs and half a billion dollars in economic activity. Now to the Minister, keep in mind there are students in the gallery here behind you. Why is this government opposed to creating jobs in Milton, Brampton and Markham? Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities. Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the member opposite for the question. We promised the people of Ontario to restore accountability and trust in Ontario's finances, part of that decision about projects across Ontario. Our government is being forced to clean up the irresponsible and reckless financial decisions of the previous Liberal government. Take your seat. Start the clock. Supplementary. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To the Minister again, Conservative members sitting in this House, Conservative members sitting in this House told their communities that these projects would proceed. Yesterday, the new Mayor of Brampton, a former MPP that most Conservatives on that side of the House happily followed for many years. He said that he had counted on the support of the Conservative member of Brampton South. During the campaign, they were clear new campuses would create jobs and opportunities in three 905 communities that get taken for granted way too often. So the question to the Minister, why did you break your promise? Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the member opposite for the question. And frankly, I reject that premise. Our government was elected to restore accountability and trust in Ontario's finances. And that is exactly what we are doing. Due to the independent Commission of Inquiry, the depths of the waste and mismanagement of the previous Liberal government are now clear. In an election year, the Liberals made empty political promises to Ontarians for programs and projects they knew the province could not afford. Hiding the costs from the public and creating the $15 billion deficit Ontario has today. The Liberals shattered the trust of Ontarians. Our focus is on cleaning up the irresponsible and reckless financial decisions of the previous government and restoring trust and accountability in Ontario's funds. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you to the Minister for that recording. I mean, for that answer. I would ask the member to rephrase that question. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I'll rephrase it. The government has been smearing the plans of these communities as a liberal scheme. But these weren't liberal plans. They were community plans that have been worked on for years and years. Not only were they plans to concert of candidates also promised to back. I'll quote the MPP from Milton. We will do everything we can to make this project a reality, whether it takes 90 million or there's more we need to do. I quote. Promise made. Promise broken. Why did the government lie to the people of my community? Who knows the rules? Member will withdraw. Response? Thank you, Speaker. And thank you to the member opposite for the question. And frankly, Speaker, I reject the premise of that question. We have been clear that only this government is committed to enhancing financial accountability and transparency. The previous liberal government, propped up by the NDP, who supported them on 97% of their votes, made empty promises in an election year for programs and projects they knew they could not afford, leading to a $15 billion deficit while hiding the costs from the public. The Liberals shattered the trust of Ontarians, and our focus is on restoring trust and accountability in Ontario's finances. Thank you, Speaker. Question, the member for sub fair. Thank you, Speaker. My question is the Minister of Labor. Workers in Ontario are struggling to make ends meet, as we all know. And paid leave can make a huge difference in the lives of workers, who are working on or just above minimum wage. The right to a day off work because you're ill or caring for a loved one isn't a luxury, it's basic decency, it's part of being human. It's concerning that the government is taking these rights away, and we've just learned that they've also quietly released a memo that says the Ministry of Labor is going to significantly curtail proactive inspections that catch bad bosses when they break the law. Can the Minister confirm that the government is not only taking away basic protections on the job, but are also planning not to enforce the few protections that remain? Minister of Labor. Well, Mr. Speaker, we are replacing the previous disastrous personal emergency leave reforms that were and replacing it with a straightforward package of eight job protected days for workers, every worker in the province of Ontario.  Businesses want good employees. They want to work with their employees. They are job protected days for employees. The member is talking about something, a memo from the Ministry of Labor. Mr. Speaker, the backlog that occurred in the Ministry of Labor, I think you should be asking the previous members of the Liberal government where that backlog came from because that was from us, Mr. Speaker. Take this opportunity to remind all members to make their comments through the chair. Supplementary. Thank you, Speaker. Back to the Minister. The memo didn't come from the previous government. It came from your government. Most employers in this province played by the rules and have good relations with their staff. We believe in good bosses. The Employment Standard Act is designed to catch the ones that don't, the bad bosses, the ones that none of us should support. Bad bosses who try to pay people less than middle wage or sometimes don't pay them at all. According to the leaked memo, staff in the Ministry say there's a huge backlog of complaints and strangely the government response is to cut down on enforcement. Minister, what is the point of having laws to protect working people on the job if the government has no intention of enforcing them? Minister. Mr. Speaker, this was a low level internal memo from August. Mr. Speaker, there is a backlog. We should be looking to the members of this government to explain the backlog. Mr. Speaker, we've been engaged in a hundred days of action to turn this province around, Mr. Speaker. But for Sudbury, come to order. Fixing the problems left by the previous government at the Ministry of Labor is introducing Bill 47 because fixing the job-killing aspects of the previous government's Bill 148 let's end the backlog until Ontario's job creation. I encourage all members of the legislature to support Bill 47 because that's what the real impact is. Next question, the member for Eglinton Lawrence. My question is to the Honourable Minister of Children, Community and Social Services. Last year, Ontario's 49 children's aid societies served more than 100,000 families across the province. Their work is vital to providing a safe and nurturing environment for children and youth to thrive. More importantly, they help bring awareness to child abuse and neglect by advocating for strong familial ties and connecting with one's community. Mr. Speaker, October is Child Abuse Prevention Month in Ontario. Would the Minister please tell us what we can do to help keep Ontario's children safe? Mr. Children, Community and Social Services. Member for Eglinton Lawrence, bringing this up in question period. It's an extremely important issue and it's one that may be uncomfortable, but we should all talk about and I think that's the first step. Communicating that it's wrong to hit, sexually abuse or manipulate a child, whether it's emotionally or otherwise. I've had the opportunity to tour the province with my colleague, the government house leader, to visit shelters where children were staying, who were also abused, as was their mother. I've also had the opportunity to go to Cornwall with my colleague, the Honourable Member from Stormontana, South Glengary, and stood with 600 people who condemned violence against children and child abuse at the Children's Treatment Centre there. We all have a duty to report. It is the law. Children's Aid Societies are available to take your call 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.  Thank you, supplementary. Minister, thank you for that answer. We have accomplished so much in a hundred days in this government for the people's work has come from making government more efficient. In fact, bringing the ministries that you oversee together as one was done to better serve children. Keeping children safe is everyone's responsibility, as you said, and I was pleased to hear that concerns can be reported 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. You spoke yesterday about sex trafficking and its role in manipulating, coercing, and abusing young girls. Can the Minister tell us how pooling resources between ministries, as this government has done, has helped us to keep a watchful eye over the most vulnerable in our province? Good question. Minister. The supplementary, I appreciate her bringing up sex trafficking as an issue that we should all be vigilant about. It's a growing problem in the province of Ontario, and later today I'll address the Canadian club in Toronto about Ontario's dirty little secret, where girls as young as 11 years old are sold into the sex trade, and that's unacceptable, and that's why my ministry is working with the Attorney General, the Minister of Community and Correctional Services, the Minister of Labor, the Minister of Health, and the Minister of Education, so that we can direct more of our resources in this province to combating the sex trade of young girls in this province. My ministry funds programs and services focused on improving outcomes for children and youth, including initiatives to find stable homes, prevention services, and supports that our youth transition into adult.  It funds the guns and gangs issues that we have in this province, and we are going to make sure, as a government, under the leadership of Premier Ford, that we stop it. Question to the member for Windsor West. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Labor. Mary Beth is a prominent autism advocate for my community. She's a single mother raising a son, Gregory, with a developmental disability, and she is incredibly frustrated by this Conservative government's decision to scrap vital labour reforms, particularly the cut to emergency leave days. In her own words, Mary Beth writes, and I quote, every day I see parents try to hold down jobs and take care of their loved ones with disabilities. Every day I see elderly parents suffer, working themselves into early graves. Two sick days wasn't much, but it was better than nothing. What does the Minister have to say to Mary Beth and thousands of parents like her? Minister of Labor. Well, thank you, Mr Speaker, and I acknowledge the parents and the struggles that they have with child care, especially with autism. But that's why we are making changes to the bill, which is Bill 47, to try and get better paying jobs in the province of Ontario. The best thing we can do for people in the province of Ontario is create an economy where good jobs are produced, businesses want to advance and produce good-paying jobs, and that will help. That they can find better-paying jobs in the province of Ontario, and they have the flexibility to be with their children when they're needed to be. Thank you, Speaker. To the Minister of Labor, I actually have several parents in my right, and he had to quit good-paying jobs, $25, $30 an hour jobs, because they don't have protected sick days.  They wait years for their children to get passport funding once they turn 18. They face decades-long wait lists for supportive housing. Their planned increase to Ontario Disability Support Program benefits was recently cut in half by this Conservative government, and now parents like Mary Beth will have to forfeit their income if they have to take an emergency day off work to care for their child. How does the Minister justify this outrageous disregard for working parents and caregivers? The Ministry of Children's Services. The forward government completely supports people with disabilities and their families. The member opposite is aware that this government is not only putting forward a legislation that is open for business, but we will follow up next month on November 8th as member opposite knows in reforming our social assistance and making sure that we have more people out of those policies and those programs are being developed right now, and I can tell the member opposite that a year from today we're going to see more people working. Those with children that are disabled are going to have greater supports than they've ever had, and that's because unlike the past 15 years where they had a discordant program, this government is working together for... Next question the member for Mississauga Streetsville. My question is for the Government House Leader. Yesterday we saw a reprehensible act of political violence committed against our Minister of Labour. The constituency office of the Honourable Member from Halliburton, Co-author Lakes Brock was broken into. Windows were smashed, furniture was destroyed and the walls were spray painted. Yesterday this chamber was united in condemning these vile acts. Mr Speaker, could the Government House Leader explain to the Legislature the position of the government and how vital civil debate is to our democracy and tell us why these acts of political violence are unacceptable? Thanks Mr Speaker and thanks to the member from Mississauga Streetsville for the question. Let's be honest about what's happening here this week. On Tuesday the Minister of Labour announced the Making Ontario Open for Business Act, a great act that our government has been campaigning on for a long long time. Since then the members of the government have received threatening phone calls and messages and even death threats. One union leader when asked what kind of action he was organizing against our government said stay tuned and then a leader from 15 Inferness refused to condemn this act on the Minister's constituency office during a CTV interview yesterday. Ontario is a democracy, we should have a passionate debate on the big issues and we respect the rights of peaceful protesters but what happened to the Minister of Labour's constituency office is a criminal break-in and it should not be condoned by anyone it crosses the line. These groups want our government to back down. They want the government for the people to back down.  Supplementary. Thank you Mr Speaker and thank you to the Government House Leader for his response. Civil discourse which includes the right to peacefully protest is a cornerstone of our democracy. However members of this chamber continue to receive threats online and rhetoric continues to be ratcheted up. As the Minister mentioned yesterday during a CTV interview a leader of the group 15 Inferness was asked to condemn the attacks and vandalism of the constituency office of the Honourable Member from Halliburton Coaltha Lakes Brock. They refused to do so. Instead they said they could explain it. Mr Speaker could the Government House Leader tell this chamber why this type of inflamed rhetoric is dangerous not only to the members of this House but in a front to our democracy. Government House Leader. Thanks Mr Speaker and thanks again to the Honourable Member for the question. We all agree that we can and should have passionate debates on big issues and that we should respect the rights of peaceful protesters. However the criminal activity that we're witnessing not only harms the members in the legislature but it harms the people of Ontario and harms our democracy. That's why we're demanding 15 Inferness immediately and unequivocally condemn vandalism, violence and intimidation tactics in all of their forms. The people deserve a clear answer from 15 Inferness. Either this group supports the use of violence and intimidation or they oppose it. Speaker we will not back down. We're going to proceed with debating and doing everything we can to pass the Making Ontario Open for Business Act. We will not be deterred from this type of criminal activity Mr Speaker. We will. Start the clock. Next question. The member for Parkdale High Park. Thank you Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Health. The opioid task force that advised the Ontario government on the growing overdose crisis has been left in limbo for the last four months. Ontario's Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr David Williams, said that the task force was an important part of the province's effort to turn the tide on the opioid crisis. Can the Minister confirm today if she has secretly decided to pull the plug on this expert panel? I thank the member very much for the question. The opioid issue is one that we take very seriously. That's why we announced the consumption and treatment services sites that are going to be applied for by a number of groups across the province of Ontario. The task force was one of the groups that made recommendations to our group in reaching an evidence-based decision. They provided very valuable information and there are no plans whatsoever to disband them whatsoever. What we are planning to do is to continue to speak to them about what's going on, what they're hearing, what other services we need to bring forward. They're performing a very valuable service. Supplementary. Back to the Minister. The opioid task force has not heard from the Minister's office for the last four months. So far the Ford government has refused to declare the opioid crisis a public health emergency, paused the opening of the overdose prevention sites, wasted four months on an unnecessary review when the evidence was clear, pitted communities against each other by placing a hard cap of 21 sites. Now the Minister has also prevented the opioid task force from doing their work. Does the Minister want the opioid crisis to escalate with more people dying every day? I would indicate to the member through you, Speaker, that that information that she has is not correct. In fact, we have consulted with them through our office with respect to the whole issue of the evidence-based decision-making we were doing. They were actively involved in a telephone conversation with us. They actively gave us information. They gave us their conclusions and we took them into consideration as we were coming to our final recommendation. So the task force has been consulted with. We have listened to what they've said and we have moved forward with it. With respect to what we're doing, going forward with the 21 sites that groups can apply to, we are confident that that is going to provide the assistance that we need to get people into treatment and rehabilitation when they indicate that they are ready to do that. There is more work to be done. We need more detoxification beds. We need more mental health and addiction services. That is something that we are concentrating on as we are building. Thank you. Start the clock. Next question, the member for Don Valley East. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Here are my questions to the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities. On Tuesday, Mr. Speaker, the Minister announced that she will be cutting $300 million from post-secondary education and yesterday, she made it clear that OSAP would be the next item on the chopping block. History has a strange way, Mr. Speaker, of repeating itself here in this legislature. The previous Conservative government cut billions from education resulting in low high school graduation rates and post-secondary enrollment. Minister, can you please explain how your cuts will produce positive educational outcomes in the province of Ontario and how will you avoid the mistakes of the previous Conservative government? Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you to the member opposite for that question. Quite frankly, I reject the premise of that question. We promised the people of Ontario to restore accountability and trust in Ontario's finances. Part of that process means making tough decisions about projects across Ontario. Our government is being forced to clean up the irresponsible and reckless financial decisions of the previous Liberal government. We now know, thanks to the Independent Commission of Inquiry, the depths and waste of mismanagement of the previous Liberal government. To describe the previous government's actions, the Auditor General used words such as conceal, bogus, deceptive, and unreliable. In an election year, they made empty promises to Ontarians for programs and projects they knew they could not afford. Supplementary. Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. Again, back to the Minister. When you ask Ontarians what they value most in regards to government services, they'll usually answer healthcare and education. Mr. Speaker, OSAP provides dreams to young people who will take on the challenges and localization will bring forward. Now, I know, Mr. Speaker, in the Minister's previous work she advocated for a two-tier healthcare system. My question back to her is, are these cuts leading to a two-tier education system here in the province of Ontario? Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you to the member opposite for the question. But frankly, I am shocked that that member has the audacity to ask that question. They were a billion-dollar deficit that Ontario has today. They fully embraced political financial decisions that the Auditor General described as bogus, deceptive, and unreliable. And I will not take lessons from members on that side of the chamber. Thank you, Speaker. Next question. The member for Kitchener, Conestoga. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Labor. Earlier this week, you announced our government for the people would be introducing the Making Ontario Open for Business Act. During our campaign and since the June election, we heard from job creators in our communities about the detrimental impacts of Bill 148. We heard that Bill 148 was a vote-buying attempt by the Liberals right before an election. I understand that the minister has spent the last four months reviewing the job-killing Bill 148, and our bill, if passed, will remove the worst burdens on Ontario businesses while protecting the province's most vulnerable workers. Despite the NDP's fear-mongering tactics, I'm going to ask the member to withdraw his unparliamentary comment. With your answer. We heard from many independent job-creating entrepreneurs who applaud the work our government is doing to provide real benefits for Ontarians with this new bill. Can the minister please elaborate on the in-depth review and consultations of Bill 148? Minister of Labor. Thank you Mr. Speaker and thank the member from Kitchener Conestoga for the question. I'm proud to rise in the House today to speak about the great work our government is undertaking. Our government is committed to serving the people of this province. Unlike the previous government and unlike the opposition, our progressive conservative government listens to the people. It's true, despite the official opposition's anti-business rhetoric and fear-mongering tactics, our Making Ontario Open for Business Act will indeed remove the worst burdens on Ontario businesses while protecting the province's most vulnerable workers. I took the last four months examining every part of the job-killing aspects of Bill 148 with every provision I asked myself. What was the impact on Ontario's economy? Does this provide a real benefit for the people? How do we ensure Ontario is open for business? Mr. Speaker, the reforms we are introducing are deliberate and thoughtful, unlike the last Thank you Mr. Clark. Supplementary. Mr. Speaker and thank you minister for your answer. I know that our job creators and workers are glad to hear that you had these priorities in mind when you reviewed and consulted on this job-killing bill. I understand that the Making Ontario Open for Business Act, if passed, will implement a package of reforms that will help unlock the job-creating potential of Ontario's economy. I am also encouraged that this legislation, if passed, will continue to protect and preserve important provisions for current workers in our great province. The minister's practical approach to this legislation is clear. Our government is ensuring that our workers in Ontario have categorized personal leave days. Our government is ensuring minimum wage workers will receive a $14 wage in addition to continued increases starting in 2020 tied to inflation. Can the minister tell this house what other benefits this bill will deliver to the people of Ontario? Minister. Thank you again to the member for the supplementary question. As mentioned, the Making Ontario Open for Business Act will guarantee Ontario workers. They will have a $14 minimum wage, which is one of the highest minimum wages in Canada. We will introduce a consistent, simple system where Ontario workers will now have a straightforward package of annual leave days, three sick days, three family responsibility days, and two bereavement days every year for every worker. As a former nurse, I understand the importance of supporting the domestic or sexual violence provisions. Our government is committed to job protection of the domestic or sexual violence leave for all Ontario workers. Businesses should have the confidence in reasonable and predictable regulations, and everyone who works should have the confidence of a good job and a safe workplace. That's what the people wanted on June 7th, and that's what we will continue to do. Next question, the member for Kiwetnaw. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the acting premier. Two weeks ago, I rose in this house to ask a question on behalf of the family of Stephen Forbister Sr. and the people of Grassy Narrows, as did the leader of the opposition. At that time, there were fitting tributes to the former chief, former grand chief, from both sides of this place. But what I asked went unanswered. Will the acting premier rise now and acknowledge that Stephen Forbister Sr. lived with and died from the effects of minimada disease? Deputy Premier, Government House Leader. Well, thanks very much, Mr. Speaker, and I acknowledge the question from the member opposite and the members who were here from Grassy Narrows in question period. This morning, I would also acknowledge that our government is taking the situation in Grassy Narrows very seriously already. Our Minister for Northern Affairs, Greg Rickford, and our Minister of Environment, Rod Phillips, sitting directly behind me, have been to Grassy Narrows to meet with the chief and elders, and I know that they are going to be continuing that type of dialogue in the days and months and years to come, Mr. Speaker. Unfortunately, what happened in Grassy Narrows is an historic tragedy, to be quite honest, in that region, and I know that our government is committed to working extremely closely with the members of Grassy Narrows and Wabesimong to come to a proper conclusion in this case, and just to continue our committed commitment to Northern Ontario, Mr. Speaker, our Premier and our Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry are in Northern Ontario, making more positive announcements. Thank you. Question to the, question to the Acting Premier again. Since, as the Minister of Engineers Affairs was also very quick to mention, he has direct experience with the former Chief Forberster in Grassy Narrows, this government should have no problem acknowledging that Chief Forberster was sick from mercury poisoning. Will the Acting Premier and the Minister of Health on behalf of this government commit today to compensate everyone in the community of Grassy Narrows and the others that are affected by it for the ongoing impacts on their health and livelihoods due to the mercury poisoning? Thanks, Speaker, and again thanks to the member opposite for the question, and welcome to the members from Grassy Narrows. I can tell you in direct response to that question, shameful that it took the previous Liberal government as long as it did without doing anything for that community. Our government has already taken immediate action to ensure that people who receive mercury disability payments are properly compensated by retroactively indexing payments to the rate of inflation, and that includes the folks in Grassy Narrows. These payments have been frozen for over 30 years, and that's unacceptable. On behalf of the Minister of Northern Affairs and Indigenous Affairs, this is one small part of the work that we're doing to addressing the long-standing challenges faced by the people in Grassy Narrows and Wibosomoon. Our government continues to work with the First Nations community there, and the federal government to clean up that river system, which has caused so much heartache for the people in that community, and to take care of the people who are sick in that community and help put the communities on a path towards a better future, Mr Speaker. Next question, the member for Scarborough, sorry, Simcoe North. Thank you, Mr Speaker. My question is again to the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities. Speaker, I am proud to be part of a government which is committed to making Ontario open for business and creating good-paying jobs for the people of Ontario. I have heard from employers in my writing that we have a skills gap that was ignored for 15 years by the previous Liberal government dragging down Ontario's economy. According to the Conference Board of Canada, the skills gap costs Ontario's economy up to $24.3 billion in lost GDP. That lost GDP means that the skills gap costs government $3.7 billion in lost revenue. Speaker, can the Minister tell us how the government's Making Ontario Open for Business Act will, if passed, reduce red tape and create better jobs for the people of Ontario? Thank you to the member for the question and her strong advocacy for the people of Simcoe North. Our government for the people is delivering on our promise to cut red tape and make Ontario open for business. We are committed to creating more better-paying jobs and making it easier for apprentices to join the workforce. That is why our legislation, if passed, will reduce red tape for workers and employers in the skilled trade sector. Our commitment is clear. If you are prepared to do the work, then you deserve a shot at the job. We are hearing positive feedback across the skilled trade sector. President and CEO of colleges Ontario, Linda Franklin, said, apprenticeship training in this province is awash with red tape. We are pleased the government is taking serious action to streamline and improve skills training. We want all Ontarians to reach their full potential by reducing red tape in the skilled trades and create good jobs for the people of Ontario. The Minister for hard work to make Ontario the engine of Canada's economy once again. I am proud that our government has listened to businesses that face constant roadblocks to hiring the next generation of willing workers in Ontario. Speaker, because of aging demographics, we need to do more to get young people into the trades so that there will be skilled individuals to fill the jobs of tomorrow. Skills Ontario estimates that 40% of all jobs created in Canada over the next decade will be in the skilled trades. 21% of Ontario's skilled trades workforce is expected to retire this decade, emphasizing the need for immediate action. Can the minister tell us more about how the government's plan will make Ontario open for business, reduce red tape, and create better jobs for the people of Ontario? Speaker, we are a government for the people and a government for workers in the skilled trades. Our plan will create good jobs across Ontario to quote Wayne Arthur, owner of Arthur Electric and Milton. We're delighted the Ontario government is making it possible for us to open our doors to more apprentices. We'll be hiring anywhere from four to six apprentices. Gerald McCann of Synergy Mechanical, limited in Etobicoke, said we'll be hiring a minimum of five new employees. And Dennis Andrizi of Beckett Electrical said this announcement allows us to hire anywhere from five to eight apprentices. And Jim Moyer, we will be hiring an additional four apprentices ASAP. Speaker, we promise the people of Ontario to create... Order. Order. Order. Member for Timmons. Come to order. Start the clock. Next question. Member for Kingston and the Islands. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and through you, my question is to the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services. Kingston's violent crime severity index rose 53% in 2017 over 2016. That is the highest spike in Canada. Despite this, the Conservative Government is withholding a much needed policing effectiveness and modernization grant. Speaker, the grant was approved and was paying for front line law enforcement teams. Speaker, why is this Government cutting police officer salaries right now in Kingston? Mr. Community Safety and Correctional Services. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you for that question. First of all, I want to make it perfectly clear that the Government continues to review its expenditures and it's looking to determine how best to allocate funds that are needed for policing. As you can appreciate and we look in the galleries, we see all these kids that are inside the house today. Our primary concern is to ensure public safety. We made an initial investment of $25 million in guns and gangs. There's a second phase that we will be working through and we are concerned with respect to issues with respect to policing. We will look at the issue in Kingston as we're reviewing the other parts around the province. We do support the police and we are providing them with the tools they need to be able to perform their service. Thank you. Those who come to order. Supplementary. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question was about front line officers in Kingston. Like many police forces around the province, Kingston was using the money to fund a coast program and give officers the resources and expertise they need to respond to emergencies where mental health is a factor. Mr. Speaker, the Ford government cut $330 million in annual mental health funding already. Now they are withholding money that was designated for front line mental health workers for interactions where the safety and security of people and officers was at stake. How can the government justify cutting the spending? Mr. Speaker, at this time the ministry has provided approximately $750,000 in funding to the city of Kingston and or the Kingston Police Services Board. As our government continues to review expenditures in light of the government's fiscal state, it would be inappropriate to speculate what the final amount might be. But let's be clear about this. We have a $358 billion debt. We have a deficit of $15 billion. Our government is responsible. It will provide the police services, the tools and the funding they need to do their jobs. We are going to do it in a responsible way and ensure the safety of the public. That is what our mandate is and that's what we will do. We start the call. Next question. Member for Perth, Wellington. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Finance. I understand there was an exciting announcement made this morning by the member for Sarnia Lamping. Over the past few weeks we have heard about the fantastic work that is being done to support the horse racing industry after it was decimated by the Liberals and sadly with the support of the NDP. We are all excited to learn that Corothe Downs and Ajax Downs will be keeping their slots. We are also happy to hear that the continued support has been accepted by race tracks in Fort Erie and Dresden. It's clear that our government is making good on our commitment to support the horse racing industry. Could the Minister please inform the House about this exciting announcement that was made to Sarnia this morning? Minister of Finance. Thank you, Speaker. And thank you to the member for Perth, Wellington. I am thrilled to share the exciting news that the member for Sarnia Lamping made this morning. Slots will be returning to Hiawatha racetrack. This agreement in principle helps repair the damage done by the previous Liberal government after it decimated the horse racing industry. Hiawatha had their slots taken away in 2012 and now our government is bringing them back. This agreement completes our program to provide support to the horse racing industry. The previous Liberal government laid waste to this important industry. The Premier promised that we would put an end to the Liberals' destruction and provide the industry the support it needs to grow and prosper. This is yet another promise made. Promise, Cat. Start the call. Supplementary. Thank you, Speaker. And thank you to the Minister for that response. I'm so happy to hear that our government is making good on another campaign commitment. The horse racing industry is important right across Ontario, but particularly in rural Ontario. I'm proud of the action our government has taken to support the industry and support rural Ontario. After 15 years of Liberal devastation to this province, horse racing can once again grow and prosper in Ontario. But Hiawatha is just the latest in a series of accomplishments for this industry. Could the Minister please explain how our government has kept our promise and supported the horse racing industry throughout rural Ontario? Mr. Speaker, I'd like to take this opportunity to congratulate Bob Bailey, the member from Sarnia-Lampton, for his leadership on this file. He was instrumental in the return of slots to the Hiawatha racetrack. After the Liberals decimated the horse racing industry, rural Ontario will now benefit from that member's hard work. With the return of slots to Hiawatha, our program to support horse racing industry is now complete. All communities where slots were removed or to be removed have either been restored or returned to the racetracks wanting them, or the tracks made a business decision to accept enhanced support for their racing operations. Either way, Premier Ford made a promise, and that promise has now been kept. Next question, Member for Thunder Bay, Attic-Pulkin. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services. Criminal activity in Northern Ontario is increasing, but yet the Conservative Government does not seem to care. The Thunder Bay Police Service has been very proactive in reaching out to the member from Vaughan Woodbridge for support and has received silence in return. In fact, the acting Thunder Bay Police Service Chief made a desperate plea to the member, as Thunder Bay is feeling the effects of drugs, gangs and firearms coming into our community. But the plea fell on deaf ears. Speaker, Thunder Bay desperately needs a provincial grant to assist the police in tackling guns and gangs. Will this government finally respond to Thunder Bay's request? Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As we've stated, public safety is our primary concern, and we're committed to examining current community funding programs and their effectiveness in reducing gun violence and gang-related activity in Ontario. What we did was we started with where the problems were greatest, which was in Toronto with the guns and gangs grants that were provided of $25 million. Our intention was and is and continues to be to talk to the stakeholders, to talk to the various police services, and determine as a second phase what needs to be done. And we are conducting those investigations around tables at the present time with the hope and anticipation to be able to deploy funding to assist all the police services where issues are prominent. We know that the issues are prominent in Thunder Bay. I'm very well aware of Thunder Bay Ottawa and the other jurisdictions that are feeling. Thank you. Supplementary. Speaker, the police are facing serious challenges in Thunder Bay and all across this province. Thanks to the government's mental health funding cuts, police are even more than ever dealing with individuals with mental health crisis. Yet the minister is refusing to fund the grants that support that important work. Why is the government refusing to support police in their efforts to handle the growing mental health challenges in Thunder Bay? Minister. Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for the question, but I do not agree with the premise of it. We have a very good speaking relationship with all the police services in the province. And one of the things that we will continue to do is to deal with the various stakeholders to determine what the needs are in the various police services around the province. Part of the work that has been done to date is to visit various police services. And as we continue, we're determining what the needs are because the policing needs in different parts of the province are not the same as the needs necessarily in Toronto or in other places. So we continue to do the work. Our primary concern is to ensure public safety. And we're dealing with that. We're dealing with that in the places where it's most prominent and we'll continue to do that to ensure that services, police services have the tools and can deliver the services necessary throughout the province to keep it safe. Next question, the member for Whitby. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Speaker, tourism accounts for over 4 percent of the province growth domestic product. And it's an industry that supports over 390,000 jobs and generates over $34 billion in economic activity. Speaker, the tourism sector has seen some incredible growth in the past two years with year over year increases and visitor spending of nearly 6 percent. Can the minister explain our government's plan to maximize the economic impact of the tourism industry and how it will ensure the industry continues to further grow and thrive? Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Thank you to my friend and colleague, the MPP from Whitby for this important question because I think he underlines what sometimes we forget when we talk about our tourism questions and our tourism operators, that in fact they are an economic driver in the province of Ontario. I was very pleased to attend the annual Tourism Summit in Windsor earlier this week and we talked about the importance of what an economic driver does. You know those tourist operators really are looking for certainty from the province of Ontario. That's why I was so proud to announce how Bill 147 is actually going to assist and make sure the tourist operators can continue to build their business, continue to provide and offer a premium tourist destination when people choose Ontario as their site of choice when they spend their tourism dollars and I'd be pleased to talk about more about what we discussed in the supplementary. Back to the minister and thank you for that response. I'm very pleased to hear that we're moving quickly to get Ontario back on track speaker. The previous provincial framework surrounding the tourism industry fell short of transforming words into action. It also was unsuccessful in clearly setting out the roles and responsibilities of both the government and the industry and it did not define speaker the role of our regional tourism organizations. In the end our tourism industry still lacks the tools, resources and clear vision required to achieve its full potential. They know speaker that there is so much potential for businesses and Ontario communities like my riding of Whitby. Can the minister elaborate on our government's clear vision to create jobs and growth in our new tourism strategy? You know during the tourism summit and I must say the theme of this year's summit was tourism matter and it really drove home the importance and the value that we have in an economic sector that frankly goes north south east west in the province of Ontario. No matter where we live in Ontario we are impacted and we have the ability to benefit from tourists visiting our province and spending money in our communities and building those businesses. So part of what we did at the economic summit earlier this week was announce a consultation. We want to make sure we get this right. Right from the beginning when I was meeting with the tourism stakeholders at AMO in the summer they talked about how we needed to change the direction in the province of Ontario. To make that open for business means something. To actually ensure through the changes that we are implementing with Bill 47 people will have the certainty they need to invest in the province of Ontario and make sure. Next question the member for Humber River Black Creek. Thank you Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Finance. This government recently improved auto insurance rate increases as high as 11.6 percent. This is the fourth consecutive quarter the government has allowed auto insurance rates to increase. Why is the minister allowing insurance companies to jack up their rates when Ontarians already pay the highest auto insurance rates in the country? Minister of Finance. Please tell me you're ready for him. Well let me remind the newer member of the deal that the NDP struck with the Liberal Party. This is exactly the disaster that became the industry insurance industry prices of today. A deal was cut by the Liberals to have the NDP support their budget if they made a stretch goal promise that nobody on either of these sides ever intended on reaching fruition.  Members please make your comments through the chair supplementary. Thanks. Thank you Mr. Speaker and thanks to the Minister of Condescension and obvious arrogance. People in mind. I would draw. Place your question. People in my community of Humber River Black Creek are paying more for their auto insurance than other Ontarians just because of where they live. This is just unfair. There is no good reason. Good drivers in the Jane and Finch neighborhood should pay double what other drivers in the GTA pay. That is why the NDP have put forward a bill that will end postal code discrimination in auto insurance once and for all. Will the minister stand up for drivers in my community who are being penalized just because of where they live and support our bill to end postal code discrimination in auto insurance. Minister of Finance. Well thank you very much. The premier has made it very clear speaker that our government is committed to ensuring fairness in rate setting ending discriminatory practices and working towards a system that puts drivers first. Now our member from Melton presented a private member's bill. His proposed initiative is a great way to combat rate discrimination in our auto insurance system. He has done this right. He consulted with shareholders right across the province and wrote the great bill. Unlike the NDP member from Brampton East who wants the GTA to be considered a single geographic area and have all of his own members rates skyrocket. Close the time we have for question period. Member for Bruce Gray Owen Sound on a point of order. Thank you very much Mr. Speaker. I'd like to welcome Rebecca Grande to the legislature today and just remind all members of the photo that will take place on the staircase for rethink breast cancer. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Point of order the member for Nicola Bell. Thank you Speaker and I would like to join to thank all of the people who support rethink breast cancer and he came to Queen Spark. Thank you for coming and remind every MPP that they are offering us a lunch in room 228. Please come and listen to what they have to say. Thank you. Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services. Thank you Mr. Speaker. I just wanted to correct something. I believe I used the number of 354 billion. It's 338 billion. Thank you. The member for a topical center. Welcome a school from my riding that's coming to visit us here at Queen's Park. Well as well as well as during your middle school will be here with us today. So welcome to Queen's Park. Thank you very much Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker. I'd like to introduce the grade 12 class from the Rehoboth Christian School from Norwich in my riding of Oxford to the legislature today and welcome. We're very happy to see you here. Speaker our director of legislative affairs in the Premier's office Cody Welton will be delivering a very educational and informative speech in the Ontario room in the McDonald block three o'clock this afternoon to Queen's University students. I know it's going to be outstanding. Thank you. Mr. Education. Thank you very much. I would just like to congratulate Bob Menka on his recent engagement. Thank you very much. I remind the members we do have introduction of visitors at the start of question period as well. That's an opportunity to do these opening pleasantries as well. We have a deferred vote on the motion for second reading a bill 34 an act to repeal the Green Energy Act 2009 and to amend the electricity act 1998 the Environmental Protection Act Planning Act and various other statutes call in the members this will be a five minute bell members please take your seats with the members please take their seats but ask for the attention of the House please. On October the 15th 2018 Mr. Rickford moved second reading of bill 34 all those in favour of the motion will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the clerk. Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker. Mr. Smith Bay of Quincy. Mr. Smith Bay of Quincy. Ms. Thompson. Ms. Thompson. Mr. Fidelli. Mr. Fidelli. Ms. Elliott. Ms. Mulroney. Ms. Mulroney. Mr. Clark. Mr. Clark. Mr. Yacobusky. Mr. Yacobusky. Mr. Hardiman. Mr. Hardiman. Mr. Tabolo. Mr. Tabolo. Mr. Qanano. Mr. Ramano. Mr. Harris. Mr. Harris. Ms. Gam ammunition. Ms. Menschen's. Ms. Hobart. Ms. Bogart. Mr. O'vers. Mr. O'er va Xer van o Bae kid want to have some kind of Mr. Sandy. Mr. Crawford. Mr. Crawford. Mr. Smith. Peterborough, Coortha. Mr. Smith Peterborough, Coortha. Ms. McAnna. Ms. McKenna. Ms. Dunlow. Ms. Dunlow. Mr. Canapati. Mr. Canapati. Mr. Babikian. Mr. Babikian. Mr. Bauma. Mr. Annan. Mr. Anag. Mr. Pang. Mr. Tanigasala. Mr. Tanigasala. Mr. Roberts. Mr. Quazettto. Mr. Quazetto. Mr. Babber. Mr. Cebauy. Although the post of the motion will please rise one at a time and be counted by the clerk. Mr. Tavis. Mr. Tabas, Mr. Bisson, Mr. Mamakwa, Mr. Carpoche, Mr. Manta, Ms. Lindo, Ms. Armstrong, Ms. Styles, Mr. Kernagas, Mr. West, Mr. West, Mr. Singh Brampton East, Mr. Birch, Ms. Burns McGann, Mr. Arthur, Ms. Bell, Ms. Morrison, Mr. Rikosevic, Mr. Hardin, Ms. Monte Tharrow, Mr. Hassan, Mr. Frazier, Mr. Fraser, Mr. Coteau, Ms. Hunter, Mr. Shreiner, Mr. Shreiner. The ayes are 60, the nays are 25. The ayes being 60 and the nays being 25. I declare the motion carried. First, the auditor of the House stated October 24th, 2018. The bill stands referred to the Standing Committee on Social Policy. We have a deferred vote on government notice of motion number 14, related to the allocation of time on Bill 32, an act to amend the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Call in the members. This is another five-minute bell. Same vote. The ayes are 60, the nays are 25. I declare the motion carried. House stands in recess until 1 p.m. this afternoon.


So today guys I bring you the location of five three legendary gear pieces which consist from cyberware to clothing items all these require you to do simply head here grab the item and that's it nothing else is really involved. Has it gone guys my name's DP journey if you enjoyed this video leaving a like really helps out and if you like what you see and want to see more Cyberpunk be sure to subscribe. So yes the items of today consist of clothing and cyberware items all legendary all three all require no shooting or anything like that it's as simple as going to them grabbing them and they're yours. So let's get into it people and first up we have the sander vistan of zaka software now this is a cyberware mod that only installs to the dinerler sander vistan mark 4 operating system which can be picked up from victor for 35k eddies but does require you to be a level 15 in those reflexes. Now this sander vistan aero zaka software is free to get and is found on the top of the aero zaka mansion as seen on the screen now so if this appeals to you you know where to find it. Okay so next up guys the legendary mantis blades now these I'm certain I think you should have to fire a cyber cycle to get in this loot chest but actually from the position on the screen now we can just rub in grab them and just run out pretty easy to be honest and have fun with these. Next up guys we have the laminated ice protected techie ocuset and credit to bv goblin for life assuring me the location of these amazing addition and also increased the armor by 20.846 what's not to love here people definitely feeling the dragon ball z references on this one too but here just be careful of the mindsurans building. Okay so next up guys we have the legendary mono wires now these little bad boys are just hiding in a random garage which you just have to run up to and open and you can get these greatly or stealthy toys so go get them people and lastly guys we have the cushion techie baseball cap now credit to sean slater 14 for showing me the location to these and well again guys just sitting there waiting for you to grab them is a free legend though these I will state need to be at least a level 5 in that tech to open his door but besides that free loot and there we have it guys 5 free legendos now remember cyberware can only be installed at reproducts so once you've obtained them head to a reproduct to install them but yes the end of the video has arrived if you enjoyed it leaving a like really helps out if you're new around here want to see more cyberpunk be sure to subscribe and if you never want to miss a video upload you can turn notifications on by hitting that bell button but guys thanks as always forced up in bye hopefully you enjoyed the video and hopefully I'll see you on that next


It is around 5.02pm, on the 10th of June 1999, and a usually quiet and calm forest erupts into a fireball. A teenager fishing by the river and two children would die as a result of the explosion, which investigators would later find to be caused in part by unnoticed damage caused to the pipeline five years before. Although a small death toll, the event would cause over $50 million worth of damage, affecting the local water supply and releasing over 277,000 US gallons of gasoline. The explosion showed the inherent dangers of the fossil fuel supply chain when the transportation of fuel from refinery to shipping terminal was required. Not much can be done about this as the constant and convenient supply of petroleum is vital to any country's economy. As such I'm going to rate the Olympic pipeline explosion here seven on my disaster scale, but here six on my legacy scale. This is due to the event not being greatly remembered today. Our story starts in the 1950s. Washington State had a capacity of 125,000 barrels of refined oil products being supplied from fourth refineries. The state has a problem and that is capacity. You see the USA has an unquenchable first for gasoline and as quickly as it is produced it is consumed. Much of the product is transported via truck or barge, which is fairly slow and as such a faster and more efficient mode of delivery is needed. Starting off in the early 1960s the Olympic pipeline company was formed. The organization set about to design and build and network of pipelines to connect the main refineries to terminals in Washington State and Oregon. By 1964 nearly 300 miles of pipeline were installed. Soon after the total system numbers over 400 miles and consists of multiple lines. In its most northern extremities two lines each 16-inch in diameter run from refineries at Cherry Point and Anacortes where they interconnect then join on to a pumping station near Allen. Heading south from Allen station are two lines a 16 inch diameter and a 20 inch diameter respectively that run parallel until reaching a pumping station in Renton. From there a single 14 inch diameter pipeline extends south to Portland with various smaller lines branching off to multiple terminals. The city of Bellingham in 1966 required a new water treatment plant. The location of the Deakin U site landed right over some of the buried section of the Olympic line. But a pipe work to still be accessible for maintenance and to not risk being disturbed. The line and approximately 724 foot long section was re-routed. The move section was constructed of externally coated API grade X52 steel pipe with a wall thickness of 0.31 inches. Before being pressed into service the pipeline was tested to 1820 PSIG on the 20th of June 1966. The maximum operating pressure was worked out to be 80% of the tested pressure resulting in a value of 1456 PSIG. The pipeline safety regulations limited the allowable pipeline pressure to 110% of the maximum operating pressure during surges which is roughly around 1580 PSIG. Now with such a large and intricate network of pipes how is the pressure kept below these maximum values? This was controlled by a series of valves worked by a computer system. To control and manage the whole system a computer administration software was employed and this was called SCADA supervisory control and data acquisition. The system consists of sensors actuators remote terminal units a communications link and the main SCADA computer. The SCADA shows a network on the computer screen to operators who can intervene to reduce pressures across the system by remotely operating valves. If situations develop that exceed preset values an alarm can be given to the operators. Olympic SCADA system used two identical computers which were called OLY1 and OLY2. One of the computers was used as the primary system with the other available as a backup. The system became a victim of its own success and as such in 1998 a new products terminal at Bayview was constructed. The new terminal was two miles upstream from the existing ALIN station. It housed five product tanks and a storage tank capacity of around 500,000 barrels. A 10,000 barrel transmixed tank was also installed as a breakout tank at the facility. To protect the facility several valves were employed. This was to reduce and even stop the flow of fuel into Bayview in the event of a high-pressure situation. The inlet control valve CV1904 was used to throttle product flow into the Bayview terminal and this was set at 600 PSI-G. A relief valve named RV1919 was installed just downstream of the control valve and was intended to work at a pressure of around 650 PSI-G. It was designed to open and transfer excess product to the transmixed tank if the pressure after CV1904 exceeded a set pressure in the relief valve. Upstream of CV1904 was a receiver manifold arrangement consisting of three motor operated and remotely controlled block valves and these also controlled product flow. But were set to close completely if a pressure of over 700 PSI-G was experienced in the facility thus blocking the whole pipeline upstream from it. These were only intended for extreme circumstances. The system also had another over pressurization prevention system and that was the pumps at Ferndale having a set limit of 1400 PSI-G in which if reached was shut down reducing the flow of fuel. When the relief valve was installed and mixed up in specifications meant that RV1919 was set to operate at only 100 PSI-G. When Bayview was opened and the line was repressurized operators noticed RV1919 opening at 100 PSI-G even though this was out of spec. The engineering supervisor instructed staff to find out why aware that the operation of the valve was from a pilot valve and spring that could be adjusted. Thinking it was at its maximum setting and not reading the instruction manual and new spring was ordered. The manual would have told them that the supplier made two types of valve a high and low pressure model both of which used the same spring meaning replacement would yield no change of operation. Regardless of this the spring was replaced and the valve was adjusted allowing the line to be pressurized. This resulted in the inlet block valve closing around 35 times between 1998 and 1999. Operators didn't think this was much of a problem but you see the inlet block valve is a safety system intended to only automatically step in during points of extreme operating conditions of high pressure. This is what the relief valve is there to do but Olympic Pipeline did not investigate these abnormal valve operations properly and this brings us on to June 1999. It is the afternoon of the 10th of June 1999. Two controllers operate the entire 400 mile pipeline system from the Olympic control room in Renton. In addition to this an Olympic Pipeline controller who had been temporarily assigned as a computer system administrator was also working in the control room. Each controller is in charge of a separate section of the network. Throughout the day the SCADA system was operating as normal using computer OLY02 operating as the primary machine with 01 running as a backup. At around 3 10 p.m. the administrator began to note areas being logged on the SCADA system after undertaking database development work. At around the same time one of the controllers began preparing to stop product delivery to the Tosco facility and start delivery of gasoline to the Harbor Island terminal in Seattle. At around 20 past 3 the North controller contacted personnel at Cherry Point refinery and asked them to begin transferring product to the adjacent Cherry Point pumping station. The pressure in the pipeline began to rise. This is normally remedied by starting a second pump at the unattended Woodenville station. This required the controller to issue the command via the SCADA system. The system failed to send the signal and almost instantly the pressure in the line rose to 1440 PSIG. The controller responsible for the other sections of the line also noted that their commands into the system had become unresponsive. The administrator attempted to change over to OLY01 computer. At around the same time the controller phoned the pumping station Allen to get them to shut down one of the pumps. As the pressure increased the block valve at Bayview began to close. The pressure sensors in the area recorded a 1494 PSIG reading at 3 28 p.m. Uncommanded shutdown of the pumps at Cherry Point and Ferndale stations also happened at the same time. With the shutdown of the Cherry Point and Ferndale pumping stations the 16 inch pipeline was essentially dead from Cherry Point to Renton. With a single pump at Woodenville the only remaining operational unit left. Strangely just a minute later at 3 29 p.m. the system recorded the pressure dropping back down to 230 PSIG. Little did they know but the section of pipeline next to Dakin new water plant by the city of Bellingham had ruptured. The very same section rerouted back in 1966. Grantically the administrator tried to get the SCADA system back up and running eventually returning to operation on OLY02 at 3 45 p.m. At around 4 p.m. the controller came into the computer room and asked if the pipeline could be restarted. At 4 11 p.m. the inlet block valve reopened at Bayview. At 4 15 p.m. the controller contacted the refinery and asked that product transfer be restarted. At 16 past 4 the controller started the pump at the Cherry Point station followed by at 4 17 p.m. by starting of a pump at the Ferndale station. An Olympic employee traveling on his way home called the control centre to report smelling gasoline at a bridge over Whatcom Creek. By now fuel was pouring out of the ruptured pipeline and the smell of gasoline was becoming unbearable for anyone nearby. As such multiple calls to 9-1-1 were made by the public the Whatcom Creek turned a strange colour. The local fire department escalated the response to a hazmat level incident. At about 4 35 p.m. the controller contacted Arco again and asked that the transfer of fuel be stopped. Emergency responders started cordoning off and evacuating the areas that smelled of petrol. At 502 p.m. fire department staff started to see fire igniting in the Whatcom Creek and Benningham police officers also witnessed the ignition. The fire turned into an explosion releasing a plume of smoke 30,000 feet into the air. The temperature was thought to exceed 1090 degrees Celsius. Three were killed Liam Wood 18 who was fly fishing in the creek drowned after succumbing to the fumes and two children Wade King and Stephen Tezorius both 10 were playing near the creek both survived the blast but sustained severe burns dying the next day in hospital. Eight more people were also injured around an hour and a half later the fire was quelled with most the smoke dissipating by 7 p.m. But what was the cause of the event? As high pressure shouldn't have resulted in rupture especially in a well-established system. The question of why would send investigators down a very worrying path in which the way the system was operated and how work undertaken near the pipeline can have a devastating effect. Investigators found that five years before the disaster the Deakin new water treatment plant had undergone modernization works. Part of the work required excavations near the Olympic pipeline. On the 9th of May 1994 during installation of a 72 inch diameter steel water line that was to cross the line of the 16 inch pipe was exposed. Olympics pipeline was then covered with material on the 12th of May 1994 with the water pipe placed some 36 inches above it. This work was undertaken under the watch of Olympic pipeline officials. More work was undertaken over the pipeline to install a tee between existing water pipeline and a new discharge line from the improved treatment site. An Olympic inspector was present but only for part of the day. More duct and pipe work was installed during the water plant upgrade with most but not all the days being witnessed by an Olympic employee. On the 11th of August 1994 several witnesses noted the pipeline being struck 17 feet north of the centre line of the tee connection. Although Olympic was not informed of this personnel coated the area of the pipeline that had been struck with amastic coating before backfilling over it. When looking at a diagram of where the rupture happened we could see that the works for the water treatment plant and the strike location match up. The pipeline was inspected between 1991 and 1999 and anomalies were discovered in the area of the waterworks but no remedial action was undertaken. Investigators found that the cause of the rupture was due to multiple failures stemming from the initial damage to the pipeline but the disaster could have been averted with proper investigation into the damage. But a failure goes much deeper than that as the way Bayview was brought online with the malfunctioning relief valve led to extended times of high pressures within the network which in turn caused the damaged section of the pipeline to rupture. The warning signs of the block valve repeatedly closing were not rectified by Olympic. This problem was further compounded with the actions of pipeline staff undertaking database development work on the SCADA system whilst it was being used to control the pipeline leading to a complete system failure. With the system unresponsive and the block valve closing precious surges found the path of least resistance. The damaged section of the pipeline which resulted in catastrophic structural failure and ignition. Apart from the human cost property damage was estimated at $58 million most of it caused by the ignition and fireball. Many nearby buildings were damaged with broken windows with one house being completely destroyed. The water treatment plant near the explosion site survived but most of the machinery within was severely damaged. The line was eventually however repaired and brought back into service. Olympic reached a $112 million settlement with the victims and in 2000 the pipeline was taken over by BP and the company still operates the line today. The area around the rupture and fireball still shows signs of damage but like all things nature has done a lot to reclaim and cover the evidence. This is the plain difficult production. All videos on this channel are created commons actuation share like license. Plain difficult videos are produced by me John in a currently wet and windy corner of southeast London UK. Check out my Twitter for all sorts of photos and odds and sods as well as hints on future videos. I've got patreon and YouTube membership as well so check them out if you fancy supporting their channel financially and all we're left to say is thank you for watching.


Axel is a tyrosine kinase receptor that plays a key role in controlling the balance between the body's immune system and its gut microbiome. When Axel is absent, the gut microbiome becomes imbalanced, leading to inflammation and other symptoms associated with inflammatory bowel disease, IBD. This research suggests that Axel may serve as a potential biomarker for IBD and a potential target for treating the condition. This article was authored by Seminiti, Harim Choi, Jongoon Seon, and others.


Whoever comes in late comes in late right so okay What's up guys happy Monday Today is YouTube live day, right? So if you guys don't know if you guys are new to channel every single Monday at 11 a.m I do a YouTube live the reason why I do a YouTube live on Monday is because Monday is used to be my worst performing day And I used to make these live videos or these video diaries to help me improve my Monday trading And it just so happens that now Monday is one of my best days ever So I do these videos every Monday and the reason why I do them at 11 a.m Is because soon as my trading is done at 10 30 a.m. I cut my trading off at 10 30 I do I've 30 minutes to just go to the bathroom get my shit together and then at 11 I come on so that you guys can see the raw Perspective or the raw mentality of a trader who has just executed that has made or lost money And you guys could kind of pick my brain and I could kind of explain to you what my thought process is because Any more time than 30 minutes. I forgot what I traded. It's on to the next I don't even remember what I traded last Monday. I don't remember what I traded last Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday It's out of my head. So whenever I see people making videos from like a week later or two weeks later I think to myself.  That's that's already over. So Sorry the production quality isn't amazing But you're getting raw Perspective and raw trading emotions and raw trading lessons on these live videos And it's nice to see and interact with the chat too. So What I want to talk about today is how to grow a small account, right? And we've made hundreds of videos on this hundreds But the reason why I want to revisit it now is because I actually saw something on Instagram, right? So right now guys, it's 11 0 5 on a Monday, August 23rd, right? So I was scrolling through Instagram. I don't know last Maybe on Saturday or Sunday And I saw something that said The lifespan of a trader or like the goals of a day trader or something like that And it went a little bit like this it went open up a small account You know small account is anywhere between 500 to 5000 in my opinion if you want to start to day trade you need at least 5000 that's my opinion. There's people who have done it with less There's people who have done it with more of a 5000 as a solid number that you need So what I saw on Instagram is this page or this article or whatever it was was the life cycle of a trader So when you want to first start trading your first goal as a trader is to have a $5,000 account Now you could make that $5,000 from selling shit on eBay. You can make that from driving uber.  So the first thing is how to get to that $5,000 to start day trading.  What is your next step?  I understand it. I just think it's stupid, right? But that's your life cycle, right? We're gonna talk about the life cycle of a day trader, right? So your first goal is to get $5,000 to day trade sell shit on eBay sell your fucking Pokemon cards Whatever it is and then once you grow that $5,000 guys once you grow that $5,000 to 25,000 your next goal is to grow that to 50,000 which is a psychological number and then once you grow that 50,000 to 100,000 now the game changes right the game changes and why does it change is because if you got to the point of growing a $5,000 account to $100,000 that means that you have a process that is repeatable That means you have a strategy that is repeatable and that means that you know what you're doing now From the beginning when you went from a $5,000 account to 25,000 to 50,000 to 100,000 Your goal is to grow your capital your goal was to build that bankroll your goal was to build yourself up Now what's the next level that happens after a hundred thousand and this is what I really liked what I saw and this is why we're Talking about after you get to 100,000 your goal is not to grow your capital Your goal is now capital preservation Your goal is to make sure that you don't lose money anymore, right?  I don't want to lose my money I'm up two million dollars this year.  I made money 30 days in a row. I made money a hundred days in a row I made money sixty nine thousand six hundred ninety nine six nine nine nine days in a row and that one day Wiped it all away All right, that is the most common mistake or the common hurdle that traders face They left one day wipe it away and that's why guys. That's why we've implemented so many barriers So many seatbelts so many parachutes so many insurance policies to make sure that once you do make it Once you do get it to not give it back And these are things that include hard market stops if you are a day trader You must use hard market stops if you are a day trader you must use max size So this is a concept that I want to talk about you guys because I trade these days like a 35,000 to $50,000 account, okay The reason why is because I used to trade with a 35,000 dollar account and every time I moved it to $50,000 I wired out 15,000 now. I'm doing the 50,000 to 75,000 It's nothing more than the same concept just with bigger numbers So it's the same thing so the point is that when I have an account That's let's say 50,000 to make the math easy for me on an account like that I don't use more than like 3,000 4,000 shares on the day-to-day The problem is is that other people other traders with a similar account size use 20,000 30,000 40,000 shares And then they let one loss wipe them out. So if there's one lesson I could give you guys It's proper sizing whatever size you think you should be using cut it in half Right cut it in half and see how much more your trading improves, you know I used to trade at SMB capital right and I had a max size there of like 150,000 or 200,000 shares some bizarre Outrageous ridiculous number right and what I learned every time I was using large size like that. I kept getting stopped out I kept fucking ruining my risk tolerance right and then when I dropped it dramatically to like five or ten thousand shares Which is like a 90% less amount I started to make way more money the thing is guys do not over size do not use large size Give yourself a max size at the broker level for most traders for most beginners I don't think you should be using anything more than 2,000 shares max size Doesn't matter if you have a $10,000 account.  This will be your barricade. This will be your parachute This will be whatever, you know, I'll give you an example on the day that AMC crashed, right? So I have a I'm a plaque I have a plaque of my exact trade on AMC when I made $705,000 in one day. So today that AMC crashed I Used 30,000 shares, okay? I used 30,000 shares because that was a first red day setup. It made the most sense to me I was stalking it for a day But before that I was only using 2,000 shares on it and the reason why is because I save I reserve I protect my max size for the best setups only so again, we'll talk about all that stuff in a different video I have fucking tons of videos on sizing, but what I want to talk about is the seatbelts so Max size hard stops max loss What is the maximum amount that you want to lose on your account per day in my opinion? It should only be one day's worth of work So if you are making consistently a hundred dollars a day your max loss is a hundred dollars a day now Why is that? It's because when you lose money in the stock market guys when you lose money in the stock market your confidence goes down I've made millions and millions of dollars in the market and 120,000 dollar loss day.   But the problem is that people make their max loss exponential, you know If you're making a hundred dollars a day and your max loss is five thousand dollars motherfucker It's gonna take you months to make that back and that's what's wrong, right? So set your max loss for only one day's worth of work, right? So we have max size. We have max loss. We have hard stops now timing is very important in the stock market, right? So what I've learned guys is ten thirty a.m. Based on my statistics based on my rules is When I lose the most amount of money after ten thirty a.m.  I leave I avoid it, right? I avoid it because that's my stats, right and just so happens that that is when That is when these zombie rule comes into effect guys, right? So those are all the ways to preserve your capital, right now the tunnel of this video is how to grow a small account, right and In my opinion guys in my opinion the best way to grow a small account is to scalp, right? people have different opinions people have different ideas people have different Mindsets and the reason why I think scalping is such a good way to grow an account is because if you only use a thousand shares And you make ten cents a share you make $100 a day There's a lot of people on the internet and a lot of people on social media that say you got to go for the big Picture plays you got to go for the home run plays you got to go for the big plays But they often forget that before they had million dollar accounts They had to build it up some way you don't start with a million dollar account and look for big picture setups You don't start with a half a million dollar account and look for home run trades What you need to do to build your account and build your bankroll is take ten cents every day Take ten cents every day and call it a day, right? And then after a month you make $3,000 and then the next month you make $6,000 and the next month you make $18,000 and the next month you make $40,000 and then all of a sudden you're now up a hundred K on the year You can now afford to maybe risk 10% of that capital on bigger picture setups So in my opinion guys in my opinion if you want to grow small account You need to use a thousand shares. You need to use ten cents a share You need to be able to make money Repeatedly right repeatedly repeatedly make money the reason why so many traders fails because they go for home runs Right always moving today the VOS the VOS was moving today and a lot of long biased traders were in the stock because of these Discord pumpers right a lot of discord pumpers were in these this stock video s They said it's a buy at six the stock goes to seven. They're silent It's like a ghost town It's like you have no idea where the hell they went right it went to seven dollars and all these guys that bought a six six fifty six six seventy six eighty six ninety seven that had no guidance on how to exit or what to do Stock is trading now a six ten they overstate for a home run and They ended up losing their money So forget the home run mentality a home run happens Fucking after every 100 trades you maybe get one home run So if 99% of the time you're not gonna get a home run Why are you going forward 100% of time? Let me say that again a home run only happens probably one out of 100 trades So there is a 99% chance that your trade is not gonna be a home run trade So why are you focused on a home run trade a hundred percent of the time when you know that? 99% of the time the trade is a scalp and you will make money, right? You will make money. So that's why I want you guys to understand guys is There's plenty of different strategies in the market. There's plenty of different ways to make money in the market You know people make money on crypto people make money on forex people make money on futures I make money on stocks and what I've learned is my strategy paid out one point five million dollars last year It's about to pay out two point five million dollars this year and God willing it's probably gonna pay out five million dollars next year So yes, sometimes on an AMC I go for a home run But that's one time out of a hundred every other day day to day like today I made three thousand dollars. I shorted VV us VV OS at six twenty nine I got out at five eighty nine I made forty cents a share and I walked away, and that's it and that's why I'm here guys That's why I'm here to educate you guys so You guys can say what you want about trading you guys can say what you want about MIC you guys can say whatever you want But I mean, I don't see anyone else coming on here every single week and teach you guys this stuff I mean, I don't see anyone throwing free events. I don't see anyone doing any of the stuff And you know the reason why we do it is because I actually like trading. I'm a passion. I'm passionate about it I like helping people. I like learning from other people as well So yeah, that was basically that's kind of the main things I want to talk about on this video is you know growing from zero to five thousand Twenty five thousand fifty thousand hundred thousand to preserving your capital What type of seat belts can you put on to make sure you do not lose that capital? And what kind of strategies that you could use to find consistency long-term in the market so Now that you have a multi-millionaire day trader here. Why don't you ask me some questions? Let's do a live Q&A guys So this is a live video. So the live chat. Let's start asking some questions.   So what do I do I go back to the questions? Hey, hey Alex was the best scalping technique for you what I like to do guys I like to look for pre-market charts that are broken that tank at the open And I short the first resistance into VWAP those are usually solid ones Would I repurchase VV OS if it hits 590? Repurchase no no no it's broken. It just had a death candle guys.  I saw your email. I'm actually the guy that helps with support. So as soon as I'm done with this Greg I'll help you out. Don't worry. What time frame are you guys using? I use the one minute for intraday I used the five minute for longer perspective and I look at the daily chart always before I enter a trade What do you think about playing ETF options in a cash account?  Why would you do that? Alex which broker would you suggest for a small account under PDT if you are outside of the USA use trade zero if you are Inside of the USA use Venom trading. I hope these videos are helping you guys man because you know I was talking to Tosh. I was like dude. I don't even need to be doing this stuff I don't need to be making videos. I don't need to be doing MIC. I don't need to be doing any of this stuff People always say all you guys are making so much money from MIC blah blah blah all the money We make goes back into marketing I make a hundred times more money from my trading than I do the community and the reason why the community exists is to Help everyone out man. So I hope you guys don't take it for granted because one day it might not exist I'm brand new to trading. I bought AMC and GME and held I'm still up on those a decent number I know this isn't real trading this MIC help a newbie become a decent trader Most of our members are brand new traders if I was you bro. I am not an investment advisor. I have no licenses I'm crazy in the head what I would do is I would again This is not investment advice is I would lock in some profits Maybe pay some bills and then focus on learning how to trade the right way guys So we used to have like a big promotions guys the only promotion we have going on right now is half off your first month so for a hundred dollars you could join the community for a month and see what we're all about and God willing knock on wood the watch was paced for itself. So I'm about done guys. I'm kind of tired Kind of want to rest a little bit. So if you guys have any more questions leave a comment on the video and What I'll do guys is because I haven't done this in a while is Leave a comment with one lesson you learned from this video And I will pick someone to get a free monthly membership If not, if you are not selected, it's half off your first month on my investing