Here we go. We're going for a swim. Happy new year. And I'm going to trial this to see if I can have a heart attack. I absolutely love it. Absolutely love it. Thank you. Well, I feel like... It's trying times, but it tries us and that's where we show our metal. I've issued a stark warning right so far. First things first, let's just get that out of this other way. Okay? One of Joey Exotic's ex-boyfriends. We've always been nice to each other, saying like, you know, we'll get through this together. I can't, thank you enough. A little unit found. Stunning colours on it. Excellent filming work there, Teenie. Beautiful. Well done. Huh? What? Pardon? What's manifested itself is I'm in the same place with Northern Monk camping. It's the seaside. It's nice, isn't it? I've strayed south of the border and we are hoping fingers crossed for some sort of catch-and-cook this time. Look at that. Right, I'm down on the coast with the main man, John, from the fish locker. It was suited and booted look. Trigger fish. He's having a new ban. Been used and much-loved. Continued to be used and much-loved to a day I can't use it and love it anymore. Tragedy has happened, though. So long, old buddy. Fox state. Served on fossils. Cooked on fossils. Take it easy. Absent friends resting piece, Matthew. One of the best eating mushrooms you can find, so to find this many. There she is, look. Beautiful specimen. What a too young stout. Or of what? I just missed it. The fans just started going.  A lot of love for everyone who's in the same boat. Just keep on plodding on, man. Just keep doing you being the best you can be. Work on yourself, be the best version of you and then anything that's thrown at you, you can deal with it better. What a year it's been, mate. What a year 2020 has been. A roller coaster to say the least. Right, Or of what? Take it easy, much love.


e there, which you can arrange in five factorial ways. Now here, please understand, you cannot or interarrange BeG because if you do interarrangement of BeG, your beg pattern will disappear. So no interarrangement of BeG. So this is the total number of ways in which a beg pattern will appear in a particular word. So that you need to subtract. Same will go for CAD also. If you tied CAD and make it as an entity, let's say I'll do that again here. So let's just CAD, I tied it up. And of course, other words are B, G, F, anything I'm missing, A, B, C, D, E I'm missing. Yeah. So again, five entities and you can arrange them in five factorial. Please do not interarrange CAD. Okay. Yes, sir. So now this is also five factorial. But remember, when you accounted for the words where beg pattern is appearing, or when you accounted for the number of words where CAD pattern is appearing in both of them, beg and CAD both of them can appear. So you have to remove them. That is what this formula says double counting would happen in this case, or double removal will happen in this case, isn't it? So I'll figure out how many of these words where beg and CAD pattern both appear. So I will take two strings now. Okay. And of course, there's one single alphabet F Oh, I'm so sorry. Yeah, one single alphabet F. So now these three words, the three units can be arranged within themselves in three factorial ways. So that it was an overcount in nx and ny so that you remove from here. In fact, you're blindly following the formula that you had learned in your sets. So this becomes your final answer and that will come out to be seven factorial minus two into five factorial plus six. Okay, of course, please you know, calculation is, you know, your domain I am not going to do it. But this is the logic. This is the expression that you should get. What is three P four, Karthik's knowledge, there is some, is this there's something like three P four. Can you choose four objects from three objects? Okay, anyways, thank you. I think one of you had a doubt. I think Tejaswini had sent me a doubt. So we'll take that up there just when you can stay back. Rest can leave if you don't have any doubt. Thank you so much. Good night. Take care.


Live from Barcelona, Spain, it's theCUBE, covering KubeCon CloudNativeCon Europe 2019. brought to you by Red Hat, the CloudNative Computing Foundation, and ecosystem partners. Welcome back, we're at the end of two days wall-to-wall coverage here at KubeCon CloudNativeCon here in Barcelona, Spain. I'm Stu Miniman, my co-host for two days has been Corey Quinn. Corey, we've gone two days, it's five years of Kubernetes, and everybody's been wondering when are you going to sing Happy Birthday to Fippy and the Kubernetes team? Generally, no one wants to hear me sing more than once, because first, I don't have a great singing voice, but more importantly, I insist on calling it Coreyoke, and it just doesn't resonate with people. The puns don't land as well as you'd hope they would.  So they tell me most are unprintable, but that's a separate argument for another time. All right, so Corey, this is your first time at KubeCon. It is.  I thought we've had some phenomenal guests, some great end users, some thought leaders. You know, you need to pick your favorite right now. Oh, everyone's going to pick their own favorite on this one, but I've got to say that it was, it would have to be, hands down, Abby Fuller from AWS. Not that I didn't enjoy all of our guests. Is it because you have AWS on your lapel pin and that secretly you do work for Amazon? Hardly, just the opposite in fact. It's that, given that my newsletter makes fun of AWS on a near constant basis. Whenever someone says, oh, there's going to be a public thing with Corey and someone from AWS, half the people there are like, oh, this is going to be good. And the other half turn ghost white and, oh no, no, this is going to go awfully. And I'll be honest, it's been a day now. I still don't know which it was, but we had fun. Yeah, so Abby was phenomenal. Love having her on the program. I'm a sucker for these real transformational stories. I'll tell you, Jeff Brewer from Intuit, there's been many times I do a show and I do the first interview and I'm like, I can go home. It's like, here we hear a company that we know, both of us have used this technology and really walks us through how that transformation happens, some of the organizational things. They've brought some software in and they're contributing to it. So just many aspects of what I look at in a company that's modernizing and going through those pieces, those kind of stories always get me excited. That story was incredible. And in fact, it's almost starting to turn into a truth and labeling issue for lack of a better term, because this is the cloud-native foundation. The software is designed for things that were more or less born in the cloud. And now we're hearing an entire series of stories on transitioning in. And it almost feels like that that's not native anymore, that that's effectively something that is migrating in. And that's fantastic. It's a sign of maturity. It's great to see. And it's strange to think of that in that the terms of the software, itself is absolutely cloud-native. It's not at all clear that the companies that are working with this are themselves. And that's okay. That's not a terrible thing. There was some snark from the keynote today about, well, here's a way to run web logic in Kubernetes. And half the audience was looking at this with a, why would I ever want to do that? Because you're running web logic and you need to continue to run web logic. And you can either sit there and make fun of people or you can help them get to a different place than they are now that helps their business become more agile and improves velocity. But I don't think you can effectively do both. Yeah, Corey, anything that's over than five years old, ew, why would you ever want to do that? Because you must always do things the brand new way.  Lift and shift is something that I cringe a little bit when I hear it because there's too many times that I would hear a customer say, I did this and I hadn't fully planned out how I was doing it. And then I clawed it back because it was neither cheap nor easy. I swiped that credit card and it wasn't what I expected. Yeah, I went ahead and decided to run in a cloud provider. Now my infrastructure runs on someone else's infrastructure and then a few months go by that the transition doesn't happen right. I was wrong. It's not running on someone else's infrastructure. It's running on money. What do I do? And that became something that was interesting for a lot of companies and painful as well. Yeah. You can do that, but you need to plan the second shift phase to take longer than you think it will. You will not recoup savings in the timeframe you probably expect to. But that's okay because it's usually not about that. It's a capability. Yeah, I had hope that we learned as an industry. You might remember the old phrase, my mess for less by outsourcing. And then we learned, oh wait, I put it in an environment. They don't really understand my business. I can't make changes the way I want. I needed to insource now my knowledge to be able to work close with the business. And therefore, no matter where I put my valuable code and my valuable information and I run stuff, I'm responsible for it. And even if I move it there as a first step, I need to make sure how do I actually optimize it for that environment, for my cost savings. There's lots of things I can do to change those kind of things. Yeah, the one cautionary tale I'm picking up from a lot of these stories has been that you need to make sure that the people you're talking to and the trusted advisors that you have are aligned with your incentives, not their own. There's, no matter where you go, there's an entire sea of companies that are thrilled and lined up to sell you something. And that's not inherently a bad thing, but you need to understand that whatever you're having those conversations, there is a potential conflict of interest. Not necessarily an actual one, but pay attention. You can partner with someone, but at some point, your interest do diverge. Okay, Corey, what other key learnings or sound bites did you get from some of our speakers this week? There were an awful lot of them. I think that's the first time I've ever seen, for example, a project being, having pieces removed from it, Tiller in this case, and a bunch of people clapped and cheered. Being ripped out of helm, it's, oh, awesome. Normally, the only time you see something getting ripped out and people cheer is when they finally fire that person you work with. Usually, that person is me, then everyone claps and cheers, which frankly, if you've met me, that makes sense. For software, it's less common, but we saw that, we saw two open source projects merging. Yeah. We had, it was- The open telemetry is the new piece. With open sensors and open tracing combining. You don't often see that done in anything approaching a responsible way, but we've seen it now. And there's been a lot of people, a little myth that there weren't a whole bunch of new features and services and whatnot launched today. That's a sign of maturity. It means that there's a stability story that is now being told. And I think that that's something that's very easy to overlook if you're interested in a pure development perspective.  I had Tim Hocken, Joe Beta, and Gabe Monroy on. Some of the earliest people working on Kubernetes and they said, look, five years in we've reached a certain level of maturity. But Tim Hocken was like, we have so much to do. Our SIGs are overrunning with what I need to do now so don't think we can declare success, cut the cake, eat the donuts, grab the t-shirt and say, great, let's go on to the next great thing because there is so much more yet to do. There's absolutely a consulting opportunity for someone to set up shop and call it imperial tailoring where they're going around and helping these people realize that how, yes, you've come an incredibly long way but there is so much more work to be done. There is such a bright future. Now I would not call myself a screaming advocate for virtually any technology, I hope. I think that Kubernetes absolutely has its place. I don't think it's a panacea and I don't think that it is going to necessarily be the right fit for every workload. I think that most people, once you get them calmed down and the adrenaline is worn off would largely agree with that sentiment but that nuance often gets lost in a world of tweets. It's a nuanced discussion that doesn't lend itself well to rapid-fire, quick sound bites. Yeah, so Corey, another thing I know that is near and dear to your heart, they brought in diversity scholarships, so 56 people got their pass and travel paid for to come here. There's really good people in the community are very welcoming yet in the same breath when they talked about the numbers and Cheryl was up on stage saying only 3% of the people contributing and making changes were women and so therefore we still have work to do to make sure that, you've mentioned a couple times on the program. Absolutely, and it is incredibly important but one of the things that gives me some of the most hope for that is how many companies or organizations would run numbers like that and realize that 3% of their contributors are women and then mention it during a keynote. That's almost unheard of for an awful lot of companies. Instead they wind up going and holding that back. One company we don't need to name wound up trying to keep that from coming out in a court case as a trade secret of all things and that's generally, depressingly, what you would often expect. The fact that they called it out and the fact that they are having a diversity scholarship program, they are looking at actively at ways to solve this problem is I think the right answer. I certainly don't know what the fix is going to be for any of this but something has to happen and the fact that they are not sitting around waiting for the problem to fix itself, they're not casting blame around in a bunch of different directions is inspirational. I'm probably not the best person to talk on this but the issue is very, you're right, it is important to me and it is something that absolutely needs to be addressed. I'm very encouraged by the conversations we had with Cheryl Hong and several other people this past couple of days and I'm very eager to see where it goes next. Yeah, okay, Corey, what about any things you've been hearing kind of in the back channel, hallway conversations, any concerns out there? The one from my standpoint where I say, well, security is something that for most of my career was top of mind and bottom of budget and from day one, when you talk about containerization, everything's security's there. There are a number of companies here in the space starting to target it but there's not a lot of VC money coming into the space and there are concerns about how much real focus there will be to make sure security in this ecosystem's there. Now, every single platform that this is going to live in, whether you talk the public, clouds, talk about companies like Red Hat and everybody else here, security is a big piece of their message and their focus but from a CNCF, if there was one area that I didn't hear enough about at this show, I thought it might be storage but it feels like we are making progress there so security is the one I come out with, say, I want to know more, I want to see more. One thing that I thought was interesting is we spoke to Reduxio earlier and they were talking about one of their advantages was that they are, quote, enterprise grade and normally to me that means we have slides with war and peace written on everyone and instead what they talked about was they have not just security built into this but they have auditability, they have data life cycle policies, they have a level of maturity that is necessary if you're going to start winning some of these serious enterprise and regulated workloads. So there are companies active in this space but I agree with you, I think that it has not been a primary area of focus but if you look at how quickly this entire, I will call it a Kubernetes revolution because anything else has takes on religious overtones that's, it's been such a fast twitch type of environment that security does get left behind because it's never a concern or a priority until it's too late and then it becomes a giant horse horses left, barn doors now being closed, Dory. And I hope we don't have to learn that. So multi-cloud Corey, have you changed your mind? I don't think so. I still maintain that multi-cloud within the absence of a business reason is not a best practice. I think that if you need to open that door for business reasons, then Kubernetes is not a terrible way to go about achieving it but I do question whether it's something everyone needs to put into their system design principles on day one. Okay, must companies be born cloud native or can they mature into a cloud native or we should be talking a different term maybe? I don't know if it's even a terminology issue. We've certainly seen companies that were born in on-prem environments. And a classic example of this is Capital One. They are absolutely going all in on a public cloud. They've been very public about how they're doing it. Transformation is possible. It runs on money and it takes a lot more time and effort than anyone thinks it's going to but as long as you have the right incentives and the right reason to do things it absolutely becomes possible. That said it is potentially easier if you're born in the cloud to a point. If you get ossified into existing patterns and don't pay attention to what's happening you look at these companies that are 20 years old and oh they're so backwards they'll never catch up. If you live that long that will be you someday. So it's very important to not stop paying attention to what the larger ecosystem is doing because you don't want to be the only person responsible for levels of your stack that you don't want to have to be responsible for. All right, want to give you the final word Corey? Any final things or any final questions for me? Fundamentally I think that this has been an incredible event where we've had great conversations with people who are focused on an awful lot of different things.  I still for example think that serverless is being viewed entirely too much through a lens of functions as a service but I'm curious as far as what you took away from this. What did you learn this trip that you didn't expect to learn? Yeah, so you know it's interesting when we talk about the changing world of open source there's been some concern lately that what's happening in the public cloud, oh well maybe open source will be imploding. Well it really doesn't feel that way to me when you talk at this show we've actually used the line a couple of times. Kubernetes is people. It is not the vendors just doing things. Internet of flesh. There are people here. We've all seen people that we know that have passions for what they're doing and that goes above and beyond where they live and in this community it is project first and the company you work for is second or third consideration in there. So there's this groundswell of activity. We're big believers of the world can be changed. I don't need everybody's full time commitment. If you could just take 2% of the US's watching of TV in a single year you could build Wikipedia. Clay Sharkey, one of my great stat I love from those environments. We believe that the network and communities really can make huge efforts and it's great to see tech for good and for progress and many of the outcomes that we see here is refreshingly uplifting to kind of pull out of some of the day to day things that we think about sometimes. Absolutely. I think that you're right. It has to come from people. It has to come from community and so far I'm seeing a lot of encouraging signs. One thing that I do find slightly troubling that may or may not resolve itself is that we're still seeing Cloud Native defined in terms of what it's not. That said, this is theCUBE. I am not Stu Miniman. All right, well I am Stu Miniman. You are Corey Quinn. Corey, how's it been two days on theCUBE wall to wall through all these things? Ready for a nap or fly home? I'm ready to call it a week absolutely. I'm somewhat surprised at no point have you hit me and one of these days I'm sure we will cross that border. Well definitely I try not to have any video or photo evidence of that but thank you Corey so much. We do have to make a big shout out first and foremost to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation without their partnership we would not be able to come here and we do have sponsorships. If you look on the lower thirds of the videos you will see our headline sponsor for this show has been Red Hat, obviously strong commitment in this community and will be with us here and also in San Diego for theCUBE on additional shout out to Cisco, Canonical and Reduxio for their sponsorship here and all the people that put on this show here it's a big community on our team. So I want to make a big shout out to my boys here coming in I've got Pat and Seth flying in from the West Coast as well as the Tony Day Crew, Tony, Steve and John. Thank you guys beautiful set here love the gimbal with the logo branding here lots of spectacle and we always say check out thecube.com to see all the replays as well as see where we will be reach out with any questions and thank you as always for watching theCUBE.


It's about the power to possess this wanting to possess comes from various things one fundamental mistake that societies have done is somewhere in the minds of the youth the male youth in the world we have put the idea that a female is a an object a thing that you can possess Either somebody's father can give you away if he refuses you can take it Still there isn't it in the background Somewhere very deep in the psychological structure There is an idea that a woman is a commodity a commodity is If something doesn't have a mind of its own that's a commodity so this probably in some places consciously implanted in many other places unconsciously implanted But it's deeply implanted in people's minds without taking this away Just one more law hang the rapist castrate the rapist he's not going to really produce results and Where does this come from? This is a very wonderful thing in the ancient Bharat or India the Hindu law proclaimed A man cannot go to heaven without his wife You must understand the significance of this I want you to understand the significance of it a Few thousand years ago in many ways today The playing field has been leveled for man and woman not because of any great social evolution but because of technology the technological development Which has made a woman being capable of participating in many global activities If there was no technology if it was a question of your physical strength which carried you from place to place definitely a Woman would be still very home-bound not that she shouldn't be home. I'm saying Being home is one thing being home-bound is one thing Being home is nice Being bound by home is a different thing so Yes, definitely When somebody perpetrates a violent act They need to be punished But still if you want a better society Not just better lungs a law or a punishment is only relevant after things have gone wrong Hanging somebody doing something else is still not going to fix somebody's life If you want to see that things don't go wrong, there may be no absolute fix But Definitely there is something called as lowering the percentages or heightening the percentages When you're dealing with a larger world It is only question of lowering the percentages Maybe there is never going to be an ideal society where no such thing will happen But in striving towards that possibility The most important thing is We need to understand right now the chant that we were doing is just about that still In most minds a woman means body parts and accumulation of body parts Yes A breast, a navel, a curve, long hair something that's why many of you have short hair this day One part of it you've gotten rid of It is still a sum of body parts why is a woman a sum of body parts in Someone who is not a woman is Essentially, this is springing. This is not just with a man with a woman also, but she doesn't Conclude the she does not make the same conclusions that a man makes But she is also bound by the same limitations the moment the boundaries of your physicality becomes ultimate boundaries of life You do not Experience your breath You do not experience any transaction that's happening to keep you alive This you think is ultimate boundary If this is ultimate boundary if I look at this Those who look like just like me They are enemies we would like to get rid of Those who look different those who seem to have different kinds of body parts Are something that you want to possess so essentially The problem is rooted in Investing too much in physicality of life if societies or human beings were Experiencing their lives little more than their physical boundaries These things would simply go down just like that Maybe not eliminate it, but would go down dramatically and considerably To a point where a few offenders you can deal with them with punishment You cannot deal a vast majority of population with punishment Suppose 10 15 20% of the people are committing crime in a society you cannot punish 20% of the population If it's 1% you can punish them you can deal with punishment If it's 20% you cannot deal with punishment. It's not going to help You want to hang 20% of the population That's going to be worse than rape and that's not going to help so punishment People think is a deterrent to some extent it is maybe For most people it is not they will just try to do it more carefully. Yes They will try to take more precautions about it maybe Because they have to more preco... take more precautions. It may come down a little bit but still what's happening in one's mind and How it translates into life is the next step, but it's happening in your mind means When there's an opportunity it will happen in reality right now It seems there are over 500 rape video games very popular the video games go like this This very popular video game goes like this a mother with two daughters He's in a railway station And the video game is about how to rape the mother If you successfully do it, you will get one of the daughters This is a video game commercially being sold bought in millions Secretly people playing these games in their homes or offices or wherever on their computers We are nurturing a sick world And we expect it to not to happen in the railway station it will happen This time it happened in a bus and This time it happened in the capital city So it's a big news whole country and the media is on fine Attention was needed for this But if it happened in somewhere some local place in some village in some little town It would be just one more statistic or it does not even become a statistic because nobody reports such things so the important thing is This is not about rape. This is about what kind of human beings are we raising? Commerce has taken precedence over humanity Commerce is not about serving humanity Humanity is serving commerce. It doesn't matter what you can sell as long as you can sell it You're doing great and you have to scale up So there is a lot of Looking at that humanity has to do One particular case of rape has brought the consciousness of the nation to a certain brink Using this it's time that We look at the essentials of life Whether the crime or violence or forceful acts are committed against a woman or a man or a child It's the same thing. It's not one is not different from the other if we Approve one forceful act the other one will naturally evolve out of it This must start from The home situation if you can force feed your child You can be forcefully sexed also tomorrow. I want you to understand this. This is how it starts If you think you can force feed your child force is okay as Long as you get to do what you want to do Then everything else follows. These are the offsprings of that We don't want to attend or Destroy the root. We just want to prune the surface because right now it hurts us That is not a solution. It's It is disheartening to see on the national news channel the discussion is should we castrate them or not So today if you castrate a rapist tomorrow cut off the hands of a thief Cut off the head of somebody else who uses his brain There is there is no limit to this. This is not the solution Whatever sympathies you may have for the person who suffered the victim We must look for more profound solutions more well thought-out solutions not simply reacting Reacting to one violence with another violence is not going to Breed a right kind of society Now is this in one society? It is not It is just that in some societies the law enforcement may be little better Don't think People are better. No Law enforcement is little better. So it's little more contained in certain societies Little less contained in other societies One way yes protection by law enforcement is needed. No question about that but still a Transformation where law enforcement can be limited to a small percentage of criminals Is the society we want to live in We don't want a big segment of population being curtailed by law enforcement alone If there is no policeman, they will do something else It's a dangerous situation to live in The statistics say that 96% of the rapes happen within the home Law enforcement never ever gets involved in this 96% of the rapes happen within the four walls of the house So it never goes to the law So this cannot be contained by law. Maybe the super violent Rape like what happened in Delhi could be controlled to some extent by law enforcement, but not the other things the fundamental thing is That you want to possess humiliate and subjugate another human being This is happening because of a certain level of inadequacy a certain level of incompleteness within you That only by possessing something You will feel a little better Whether To fulfill this possession you go shopping or you go raping. It's the same thing Something is inadequate You want to fulfill this by getting something? This will find all kinds of ugly expressions. Some of them you may think is harmless But if you do this today and fulfill yourself tomorrow, you would like to step it up to something else and something else and something else It will not stop at one thing So the solution is not in just Containing it the solution is in transformation of the individual human being and Nobody is willing to invest any time or life to make this happen Everybody wants an instant solution go on the street to test for two days and world will change World will not change Your world has to change First thing is willing to invest time for my own transformation Only if you're willing to invest time for your transformation You're willing to invest time for other people's transformation because you understand the value of what it is If you're not willing to invest time upon your own Transformation where is the question of doing anything for anybody's transformation? If you do not know the value of what it is Experientially you will never invest you You see this every day.  What great things have you done which are so important? There'll be nothing great But when you want to do your morning meditation You will see there is something more important to do this means You do not hold human transformation as a very crucial thing You think it's an entertainment You think it's a side thing to do It's not the side thing to do it is the main thing to do Transformation is the main thing to do if we do not transform individual people You just have to do with a world full of criminals Some will come it some will not come it some will do it on the video game Some will have the courage to do it on the street Closet rapist or street rapist not very different, isn't it? Maybe for the victim, it's different but For the world that we live in it's not different. You're still living with such people, isn't it? So if this has to change we need to understand that Individual transformation is the most crucial thing if we are not willing to invest on that We just have to do with what we have And worse will come Not that it'll not come worse will come Every time there is no law in a certain place every time a war happens What happens there apart from the killing what happens there is worse than the killing Almost everywhere so These are all the same people that you live with These are your sons and husbands and brothers They are so nice But if if nobody's watching them, they are something else Transformation means just this That who you are is not determined by Other people's opinions or other people's presence you are like this Somebody's there or somebody's not there This is the way you are. This is transformation If this in this direction humanity does not make an investment In this direction if every parent does not invest upon their children to transform them into a more inclusive human being Inclusion just means this technically to bring it down to very technical level inclusion Don't teach it in the name of love embracing the world this and that Inclusion just means this that Who you are is not limited To the absolute boundary of your physicality It is little more if it's little more the very way you walk on this planet The very way you breathe upon this planet the very way you exist in this planet will be different simply because Your idea of who you are is beyond the boundaries of your physicality. This one thing happens to the human being Suddenly he's different in every possible way so investing Investing in a spiritual possibility a possibility beyond one's physicality Is the only ultimate answer there is But if you want long-term benefits, it's a long-term investment Short-term shoot the guy hang the guy Well, you will breed another 10 tomorrow and don't think these rapists or whoever some horrible creatures who landed from somewhere Everybody has these drives but Many have cultivated the a certain level of discretion Where they will not allow their hormones their urges and their longings to go beyond a certain point This cultivating this discretion Some people naturally have it to a certain level Some people have a little less of it culturally in terms of home situation in terms of schools if this Discretion is not brought about it Individual person is able to employ his discretion. It doesn't matter how hungry you are how long how much you're longing You're able to stop yourself at a point if this discretion is not taught to every individual if this is not cultivated One drop of alcohol, they'll become animals So what is happening? Very nice people One drop of alcohol. They're becoming like animals because their discretion is taken away. They were always animals controlled But once you remove the stopper it goes away. So this is one way but the more important way is To evolve this human being to your place where he is a being he is not driven by his body alone Body is just one aspect of him. If you close your eyes your body should disappear All the needs of your body should disappear It does to some extent for everybody to what extent is a question of how much have you invested? If you invest enough if you close your eyes This body and the ways of this body do not apply to you anymore This needs to happen more than ever now because Humanity is on a certain threshold We can either fall this way or that way We are in numbers like never before We are packed on the planet closer than ever before If you're going to really sit close up with everybody upon this planet, it's very important that people next to you don't stink, isn't it? No Yes or no if each one of you We're living in your own forest desert or mountain. We didn't care how they smelled So we are living very close up World is getting more and more populated So it's very important that people who sit next to you are clean and well behaved Isn't it?