two four card segments here Wopper wopper wopper Wopper juniors double triple Wopper flame girl tapes with perfect hoppers BK Habit with your way New rule And you'll have diarrhea Probably No, there's one more Tony after this Ah yeah one more jumbo case still Tony Gonna do four cases of choice after this And that means we'll have one jumbo and two choice left I'm gonna stand up after this these two jumbo cases because I don't know probably Timmy Probably making me delusional at this point BK Habit your way You rule Girl tapes with perfect hoppers No no one of ones actually They hit a Brady base that was good They hit a Brady base We've got to our recap to do after as well So I got 20 minute recap More than that I got hammered for a recap Pump it loud uh pump it Okay louder It can officially say 11 24 p.m I have lost it I have lost it All together All right here we go Not good None of them One hit Yeah Jesus my bad Gendel George It's not as bad as Bryce then He hit more than that Cold and led better to 4.99 New Wyatt Langford base auto There we go That's the fourth Langford of the case now Over the second half now Brad's on now we'll mag that one Wyatt Langford spot Congrats Very nice Very nice Tai Pete first base auto There we go again Jason This one there buddy Teal wave Christina Vecchero Blake Mitchell Xander Muth to 50 Purple Kevin Sim James Wood First base auto of Zach Levinson One of those police cars are still at Popeyes It's a big question of the day right here Sean Could have been a sale on chicken Tai Floyd First base auto Tai Floyd fever What do you say It's right there It's right there That's kind of still deep 4.99 From the hood Popeyes The one on main Main street I'm saying from here No I'm talking about like being in the hood Oh yeah That's literally right there Right there Wyatt Langford to 250 Purple Dylan Campbell to 250 Purple auto Brader to 1.99 Jackson Shurio Hackingberg I think he's got an open queue On channel two Yes open queue on channel two everybody Open queue on channel two The first person that he's ripping right now Do it I think he'll be there much longer Like boby Yeah Matt Shaw mood ring Hopefully he'll be entertaining Yeah that's really the that's really the goal Draw people in from just pure shock value Roman Anthony to 4.99 Yeah that is a terrifying introduction There's definitely been a few people here and there that have That have turned around after that Yeah especially when Jake's in there Then it just thinks dude Hi it's Max Anderson Black to 75 What is that? What did you say that Wyatt Langford based on Bryce Eldridge And Mike Bobey He cleared somebody He could have really quit He could have had some less too The stack Hard segments Merlin was that Merlin good? I know there was a renaissance in there So that's not bad Yeah that's all the elements though And yeah the whatchamacallit Hot Walker Ooh Clay Maui Ahuna First Patrick we're gonna have a couple of Sports Tommy Troy first base auto Who was it you said again? Wyatt Langford Base auto There's just the base auto Cole Carrick to 199 Did you mag it? No you didn't mag it already No I don't know right I think it was a Wyatt Langford base auto I don't believe it was No super yet gamer No no super yet I put it over here 150 Chris Clark Max Clark You got it right here There you go You sent us all recently Yeah Yeah no queue on channel two Four personals The Zanzanatella First base auto EJ Ewing Tai Pete first Auto supers First base auto Zanzanatella Blue of Alex Clemmie Purple Connor Burns the 250 Of course he does Children eat those Really left him alone again It's like leaving a child unattended It's like a grocery store EJ Ewing Christian Nabzik I'm the only one on the floor You're the only one on the floor I haven't been sitting there In that packaging for probably 10 years Probably Looks like it might have been a few Seth Keener too 125 Never do those cookies taste fresh big Ever Nice gold made diamonds Paul Schemes 50 uh 46 to 50 The skiing spot on the bowman glass Mag that one for you Congrats skiing spot Cam Collier Yassir Mercedes the 125 Langford Radfield Yeah Yeah tomorrow I am no contact With anything to do with uh where tomorrow 299 is Jonah Cox But I would be more than ready to go on Friday Yeah we're gonna need a uh small high A brief hiatus from cards tomorrow 2125 T.J. Nichols And Cooper Ingle Paper Bachelor though that Which one's it Last segment I'm gonna step out for one sec We'll do four choice cases I gotta not stare at the screen I need the cards right now Yeah I'm gonna trust me to do it Be an Olympic sport someday Breaking I know honestly Why? Why let you go for Rhett Louder And Coffee Don Let's go Drew Picking up some personals Rubaca Talking to somebody so Yeah I think so Myself Maybe Dylan Campbell first base oughta Six more choice cases One more jumbo case Gonna knock out four of the choice right after this And that'll leave us with one No knock out the last jumbo Finish with two choice Yellow of Jacob Gonzalez first And we still got the recap to do too Cole Carrick First base oughta Joe Bertrano Jackson Holiday Emerson Trey the Ray Trey Morgan is now known as Trey the Ray So I would Okay I like it All right I'm up with that today Yeah You order Okay Two one ninety nine Mike Romero Yeah Drew Baca Start horse for the kids One eight seven seven cars for kids A A R S cars for kids We hate kids First base oughta Alberto Rios Gracias sir Thanks Kyle Teamplay right there Oh yeah Always Always Jacob Barry Sparkle Like most of us are Yes Not both of us No Roman Anthony to one ninety nine Yellow of Roman Anthony to seventy five Okay True true because looking for Kyle A jail duty's over here Sorry sorry he's going He's going to grab it now Drew Hunter Holland Take your car today Don't hit your kid for a car Cars for kids you see what you're doing Yeah The legal and I weren't trolling you Oh yeah It is all hands on deck for the 30k sir Absolutely Oh he's all hands on deck All right Pete Now this recording's at so much seven hours dude Purple Brenda Maya to 250 I think we would have gotten this done quicker if We had other people like ripping Like we usually do on the Bowmans Drew Gilbert True green of Cole Miller Two ninety nine First base auto Jack Mahoney True orange Uh Samuel Basile It's kind of a nasty color match actually Congrats on that Orioles And the all other spot Langford first And Anthony Gutierrez Green paper Green paper Two four ninety nine Jake Cunningham One more jumbo left now Six more choice That's very good feeling I'm gonna get the next four choice cases Queued up on your on the screen And then I'm gonna step out for about Minutes or so Let Sean catch up for a minute And one for a second here Most entertaining chatters of the night God All right four more choice cases Here we go Tony Sam's cars to the kids It's a little too new To be donated quite yet That is going to be Alex Clemmey to 150 choice exclusive Gold shimmer Saban Sabayosh to 50 And Cam Fisher First base auto To 99 Jack Mahoney Tied Pete first base auto And first bait or uh That is a choice exclusive to 150 Joe Vitrana Justin Reimer First base auto All too quick there First base auto Dylan Campbell And first refractor auto Max Anderson To 150 is Brayden Taylor Damn three choice exclusives in this pack Always one there for the Brayden Taylor spot Nolan McLean to 150 Very nice And 150 Jack Mahoney That is a Elian Soto to 150 Base auto first Seth Keener And Green Carson Rocca Forte to 99 For the class of 2023 auto First base auto Kate Denton First base auto of Cole Foster And 150 Nizanzanatello choices Floyd to 499 First refractor auto By Floyd Spahn First base auto Noble Meyer Noble Meyer spot And then choice exclusive to 150 Carson Rocca Forte That is a first base auto Jonah Cox Damn right Stephen To 50 is Austin Troser Purple Auto Troser spot And Green Lava Travis Honeyman To 99 Green Lava Nice that is a Eric Patonty To 25 Orange Wave Brew Crew and the Eric Patonty spot First base auto Hunter Holland Base auto And 150 Grant Taylor Choice exclusive Quinn McDaniel First base auto Gigantes Joe Whitman To 150 Gigantes again Choice exclusive And refractor Jake Cunningham To 499 That is a Teddy McGraw First base auto Teddy McGraw spot His dad's name is actually Tim But it's not me Tim McGraw Oh really? Yes Ty Floyd says it on the back It was Cart First base auto of Ty Floyd And Ty Floyd again This time Aqualava To 199 Ty Floyd spot Doing well in that one box right there 70 mile an hour Bowman rip Yeah that was That was probably the quickest I've ever opened a case of Carson right there That was That was a clinic First base auto Adrienne Santana Kevin Sim to 150 on the choice exclusive Diamondbacks And then first base auto Jackson bowmeister For the Orioles I'm messing around on these choice cases now Another Ty Floyd my god man To 150 Choice exclusive Little mess up on the third true Jackson bowmeister First base auto again For the Orioles in the Jackson bowmeister spot And then first refractor Enrique Bradfield Jr Nice one there Bradson Enrique Bradfield Jr spot To 499 first refractor auto CJ Caifas True blue to 150 True ble CJ Caifas To 99 grace and hit Green lava CJ Caifas actually his uncle Was watching the stream the other day Oh yeah Yeah And then gold wave Sean Sullivan Sean Sullivan spot And the guy Cade Denton In this product he was in this fanatic stream yesterday Oh yeah Mm-hmm Freaking Hell yeah Seth Keener to 150 First base auto Zach Thornton For the Mets And class of 23 Tommy Troy Bradson that Tommy Troy spot Very nice Of course pulled the super of Tommy True First super of Tommy Troy today In a mixer First base auto Michael Uh Carica Green lava Tayshon Walton Nice one there to 99 For the um Phillies and the Tayshon Walton spot And first base auto Marcus Brown It's Browns Maui Ahuna to 150 Choice exclusive Xander Muth to 499 on the refractor first auto Xander Muth spot Kemp Alderman Gold shimmer auto to 50 Kemp Alderman spot again The gold shimmers being exclusive to Choice choice and choice only Jack Mahoney to 150 Green uh lava jace verofin Or jace ibuprofen is illegal would say 99 and then to 499 Andrew Pinkney Andrew uh Pinkney 2499 All right last key or uh last of this uh This segment got you illegal LaShawn's Dismay Channel to whizzo Bot lobby To whizzo Bot lobby Bot lobby Full of stingers Full of stinky humans What did it smell like when you went in there with Justin and Kyle? Wanted to kick you in the head True gold Langford Mack let's do it Let's go This case right here Nice Ethan Salas To 99 on the short print congrats on that Pulled a uh holiday one of these yesterday Very nice Take a solace To at 150 at Cooper Engel Choice exclusive Gaddians And first base auto cake color Cut up in a minute How do you hurt your hand? Oh that guy I wonder where he's at today Probably quit another job Recap Bradfield first base auto We have plumber all the time It's plumbering To 99 is Brock Rodden And first base auto Maui Ohuna 99 Jack Hurley First base auto of Joe Redfield The Max Clark there we go to 150 finally a Clark In the second half First one of the second half So congrats to the Max Clark spot That'll do Get that into a max where you had Clark spot That was shocking Brandon Winnaker first base auto We got a plate coming up here everybody That was shocking Uh Dillon head green lava to 99 There you go Dillon head spot And plate auto is Brock Rodden Congrats to the Brock Rodden spot Very nice That'll work Jack Mahoney first base auto Go to bed illegal Yeah dude 199 Carson Roccaforte To or Aqualama And green lava Cole Miller To 99 as well Very nice lobby Full of steamers It is about lobby in there So look out How do we each other 150 chase Davis Choice exclusive on card Nice gold Braden Taylor class of 23 to 50 Rats on that's Braden Taylor spot And first base auto of Jonah Cox For the athlete To the jumbo case now everybody They stink Yeah Big time Recap Where's the uh the first half Here we go Right there Yeah Yes it does illegal All these cards are now up for grabs I like it Oh my god Hello Shady Can I get an old yager Oh great I need some old gray hair Can I have some gray hair in my cup There is no Oh what are we doing This Yeah we did Damn it There's no face here we go Last jumbo case everybody Two more choice cases after and then We will uh be done We'll do the recap and we'll be out of here Oh yeah starting stage of the carpal tunnel for sure Who is this one? I don't know Who is she? You know I do but I don't know exactly I can't show you All these friggin Yeah commercial I have no idea if she was here What they do Wait what happened Honestly we have not talked about this Shady This is the first time I'm hearing something happen Did he get suspended? Not heard a thing dude No I know what happened Obviously we're all aware of what happened But we didn't know any of the repercussions Or any of the Final lead Suspended indefinitely Wow Wow That's what you get man Can't do that I mean that's a repeat repeat repeat repeat Repeat offender of that Kind of stuff Tommy Troy Sean Sullivan to 499 Yeah he does Right Cole Carrick Jackson Holliday Mood Ring of Paul Skeens Right exactly Tommy no kidding Shrew Blue Connor O'Holloran That must be English That was terrible Thanks for bringing it up What? Shit to 75 Tanner Hall Yeah How do you think it was? First base autonobal Meyer They're like R stream or your stream Not both Raiden Burke Yeah They shouldn't have lost the game dude Dolphins right now that was bad Pathetic Yondra Vargas Like I hate to say I was rooting heavily against the Finns For the Ravens playoffs Like the Raid for like seating purposes But I was tough to watch Andrew Pickney to 50 Thank you biz Mac True gold auto Come on man Is Max a mod? Did you know that? I don't care Like Crowell First of Wyatt Langford First refractor Louder No it's embarrassing to lose When you're up by two tutties Just three minutes left That's that's a problem Changer 0 and 392 In that sense Yeah Yeah not Not a not a part of history You want to be on the receiving end of For sure First base auto Jonah Cox Skeens Homer Bush First base auto Tommy Hawk Kevin Prada to 250 That's Kyfer Lord What's up Brandon? Thank you Appreciate that buddy What's up Brandon Appreciate that Doing well First base auto Jacob Gonzalez Hunter Owen to 199 Mike Bovey There's an orange paper Carson Rocca Forte 25 Foster Cole Emerson True Green Draft picks and process Or prospects to 299 And Hackenberg Next segment This is the end of it too Shorts there's a lot more before this Holy cow Non-stop for the last now Seven hours and 15 minutes Raider 125 Jason Shurio Hunter Holland First base auto Yeah that's some good stuff for sure John Hit a Brady base luckily Finally First base auto Brock Rodin True Green of Jonathan Mejia Bless you Thank you Gradient Wyatt Langford to 199 The paper Nice one there Gradient house of pace Mood ring of Rike Bradfield Gradient of Conor O'Halloran That's bad dude Problem dust is brutal Noble Meyer It's a flag variation That's all I'm doing Is that Rainer Arias? Yes it is 254 Black Jovatrono to 75 For the Dodgers Jovatrono spot Congrats Burgoyah to 99 It's a red lava It's a red lava Of Tamar Johnson one of five Nice one there Congrats all other Grayson hit to 50 Hey refractor first auto set to Keener 2,490 That's Clark first refractor Be an orange True orange coming up here An auto It is an auto of Tommy Hawk to 25 True orange Nice one there Tommy Hawk spot Hunter Haas Sparkle It's a true green auto Devin Saltibon to 99 Two more Jumbo segments And then we are done with Jumbo Two more choice cases And then recap Let it be Have a go on Scott Later, later Have a good night bro All right Here we go Stay gold, Ponyboy Jujiraio Fragile Fragile must be a talent Want a major award Made prize With you on that one Channel two today Because the jerseys were in the background Or not on channel two on thematic's live Someone asked Because there's a Trevor Lawrence And a Vince Carter jersey in the back Frank's only goes for this orange Carter Renzo Carter Oh yeah Mitchell Lemon Olsen Anthony Gutierrez to 199 That is a Brandon Winnick here to 499 What's up John How you doing Greengrass Brock Raidenberg to 99 Orbath Hey Quinn McDaniel Luke Um Casual to uh 99 I was gonna double that paper Yeah I know I'm so excited man Shears to 499 Purple Hunter Holland 30k sir Zach Thornton First base auto Be a good time God man Trey DeRay Purple He's out there You're okay 2.50 I want a little bearing You want a what You step in for one second Yes First base auto uh Hurston Waldrop What'd he say I don't know He's getting named next up man I'm lost Trippy Trippy Trippy Trippy Both of them We're a freighter Alex Ramirez to 199 Watch Green Jacob Wilson Hunter Brown firsts refractors Jacob Gonzalez on the uh Glass Glow Yossir Mercedes It's about right SM Yeah dude At this point First base auto Cooper Engel Bringle spot Oh no okay I'm he's getting in the action No Bofa He's in the trenches right now We're getting in the action Trying man I'm trying Bofa's in the trenches We're in Jake DeLeo first base auto Is this supposed to be a mag? Do you know? Uh no Okay Down Crompile down Crompile down Oh no Over Over You're in a lot of computing right now, huh? Me?  No I mean It was a lot What's this? Uh that is Right You are messing with a man who's got nothing to lose After 30 cases Yes you are Card breaking death row Oh my god This is card breaking death row man Uh Jacob says to check instagram Kyle Please Hurry I'm gonna breaks out of this one Uh zero Two more choice cases But those are easy Those are super easy Nightmare I am gonna probably have Bowman Draft nightmares I'll be honest with you about that Plate coming up here Kyle Jiggen wants to know if you worked well That is a Why a cuticle He does Nice one there It's just beginning Wow whoa Whoa Four plates in a row Really?  Larry says good evening What's up Larry? Larry Mitchell 250 Larry I was an air on the packaging machine for sure That happened to me once last year too Mahoney to 250 in In draft I hit um In one case there was like Eight printing plates In one case of Superjumbo It was wild Printing plate autos too Cole Emerson It's a lightning auto That's pretty sweet Like the lightning Oh yeah True gold first Kempa Alderman 250 Paul Skeens It's gay yeets Plates yeah A lot of plates in a row there Cam Flagger and Lucas Gordon Cole Miller to 125 Selman Seliston to 125 You're nice Jacob Hell yeah Good team Good team for the first auto squad That's Kyle's squad right there Guy Blue Chrome Saban Sabayev's Ty Pete's Luis Almeida Xenermuth First baser Hauke and Francisca Now you're working tomorrow right Sean? Man I work with Kyle tomorrow night Yeah You're tomorrow and Friday Avis Kendall George to 125 Probably true Ken Fisher Well Koopa This time over I don't know Ackonburg to 499 We're not very good Yeah I saw Berubi got fired It's awesome Troser There's Elianzoto First baser Who wants to know if you think the lightning Both would sell in shop You get them out of that exotic Yeah it was a little caveat And so I'm just thinking we spoke Ooh Hunter Haas that's awesome I don't know Drew I don't know Sweet though Drew I'm in on that Michael Carrico to 499 And we're pretty close to Tampa Probably more Vraidenberg to More to 250 Tampa fans over here but I don't know Friday morning should be Sam Or Black Yeah Friday morning's me on the On the main Yeah we're doing a full recap after For both halves Jack Cunningham Or Jake Cunningham First baser Ty Floyd And Sam Bessiah Rock Regio For the Yanks And the Rock Regio spot To 199 John DeMahia Let's do it Doubling up on Seegers Kim Jackson Wiggins Chase Davis Yeah if you are thinking Drew About consignment Just send Lane an email Yeah absolutely He can let you know if uh What he thinks about it Anything Timer and bowmeister Might be worth it to be honest Let's open the paper Okay I did a recap of all the paper base Snack on a bedside man Take a minute Face All right done with Jumbos Let's go Last Jumbo case is done Number 10 Case number 19 and 20 of choice Oh can you write a sticky that's Cases 16 through 30 When you get a chance I just got to try Just got to uh mark off the paper What did that little uh bin From here again To put it up there Yeah put it in there There's still enough room Two cases of choice everybody It's all we got left I'm gonna end the video Get the recap set up I'll do it We've got seven hours 39 minutes Right now Seven hours 39 minutes deep On this warm break All right First base auto of Paul Skeens All right it's on that one there Our first green lava cold carry 299 cold carry Rocky spot And refractor Max Clark There we go Nice one there Good stuff We'll get that into a mag There you go Max Clark spot I think that's a second clerk Of the second half now Right Joe Redfield 2-150 2-150 is Joe Whitman This time on the blue wave And green lava Colin Hauke Nice one there Colin Hauke spot 299 Green yaba Yeah I think it was about Yeah five Five oh seven eastern Yeah I have the record It's seven hours 40 minutes Right now is the total Because I haven't The recording hasn't stopped Uh I believe he was Third third Jacob 299 Ethan O'Donnell Ethan O'Donnell spot Teddy McGraw first base auto For the men in us And the Teddy McGraw spot And Xander Muth 2-150 Xander Muth Bon Fitti The gold's coming up here Two gold shimmers First one Cole Miller 2-50 What's up Mars That's on that one There you go uh Cole Miller spot First base auto is Sean Sullivan Sean Sullivan spot And Teddy McGraw Gold shimmer 2-50 Garrett Forrester to 1-50 Blue wave 2-1 Or 499 Refractor Noble Meyer The Marlins first rounder Pitcher And first base auto Teddy McGraw First base auto AJ Ewing AJ Ewing spot That's a truth Ruth Michael Carricka First base auto for the Cubs Michael Carricka spot And first base auto Zach Levenson For the Cardinals That's case of the day here Sean Thank you Case number 30 of 30 There it is No no color Langford In 30 cases Unless we hit one here A bunch of base autos Like eight base autos though Super counter is at zero Zero supers I did not collect these boxes to be fair though So I'm gonna blame that on whoever collects them Orange wave Grant Taylor to 1-50 Travis Honeyman First base auto And orange wave Hero Wyatt Nice one there to 25 Grats on that one Hero Wyatt to spot Appreciate that Craig 2-1-50 Cole Miller Probably you guys watching to be fair Nice one there Choice exclusive First base auto Devin Saltibon For the Fills Green Lava Cade color 2-99 Lava of Noble Maher 2-1-50 Grayson hit And 4-99 Jackson Wiggins Refractor Oh Thank you Thank you Thank you everybody Absolutely Thank you Remarse 2-50 is now a Luna That was a grind right there That was a grind And only McLean First base auto And first base auto Andrew Pinkney Well thank you Playful harassing It was fun Did you tell? The 4-99 is Hunter Holland For the Reds Thank you Shorts 1-50 AJ Ewan And first base auto Zach Thornton Last Box Of the entire case The entire break Cooper Engel 2-1-50 Yeah exactly Timmy Choice exclusive First base auto Eleon Soto For the Nats And then Green Lava Luke Cashel Or Geeshel 2-99 That is going to do it For the 30k break of 23 Vomit Draft Jumbo and Choice Recap coming in just a minute God bless America


Hi, good morning, and welcome to today's products and focus US 30 there has come down slightly overnight Following Friday's told you formation have another negative day yesterday just closing on potential support at 17 7738 as news is filtering out this morning that European leaders are Preparing for a potential Greek exit and we've seen more unrest out in Ukraine as well as a conflict of their seems to intensify Most markets have ever actually moving sideways Gold in particular US 30 is very Flat and so is the Germany 30 But nevertheless for your training above both moving averages The MACD is going neutral as are most of the other technical indicators on the US 30 So if we move on to the UK 100 Negative a kind of hammer formation yesterday, so bounce off 6 to 7 71 Another negative day at the moment currently a bearish engulfing pattern should that continue on and we're trading already currently at the low of the day moving on to Japan 2 to 5 Managing to have a little bit of a positive day negative day after the negative crossover on the MACD You do actually have a golden cross and moving averages right there But as we come quite close the potential support still remains at 17 496 and Dollar yen had reversed course yesterday So it's a little bit of yen buying as people buying a little bit of safe haven protection But the US dollar is not going away falling on from non-pump heroes on Friday, but we're not seeing any Excessive moves on the green back currently But that dollar yen FX pair will be driving the potential growth of Japan 2 to 5 And as you can see we've hit a barrier there running about 119 yen Other technical indicators are relatively neutral So it needs another catalyst some more macroeconomic data or stimulus to get it over the line So moving on to cruel with Texas Getting closer to around about fifty four dollars eighty-five I did say a report yesterday. This is a bank seems to think that with Texas could get down to twenty dollars dollars a barrel There was report on Monday afternoon That there was a belief that the existing oil producing countries and an OPEC and the non-OPEC Regions would keep their production relatively stable if not slightly less So they're kind of indicating that there's gonna be a little bit less supply there, but then there's another Report coming at about the state of the US shill gas and shill energy sector We're sort of that still expected to grow one of the big energy growth stories still From that part of the world up and all the way till till 2020 based on projections So there could still be pressure in regards to potential supply in the future But West Texas has not reacted to Too much to either side of those stories that came out yesterday So moving on to gold gold's done absolutely nothing last couple of days looking at an interesting standpoint on the candle Stitcher we are slowly moving up long-legged candles are indicative of selling interest each time it goes up It gets pushed back down, but it is making progress But 1242 is a next potential Resistance level that gold needs to overcome and certainly in the backdrop of stronger USD and rising interest rates in the US The fundamentals are not in its favor So looking at your dollar Again relatively flat. We need to get more information about what's happening with Greece and the impact of Greece If there was a Greek exit might just be a little bit of scaremongering by European leaders to try and threaten the Greek government To various repercussions should they not play ball Obviously do have the Ukraine conflict escalating as Russian back separatists apparently are making gains in the region with Obama considering to send lethal aid to the Ukrainian government to help them battle against Russian tanks in the south And that's obviously causing a little bit of issue in that side of the world But the euro is not Excessively pressured. I'll be as be quite flat. So has cable instantly Not much to report in regards to main technical levels one spot 1642 remains resistance One spot 0786 remains potential support. That's a longer term potential support should the greenback accelerate and the euro take it back See so finishing up with GBP USD Again not really doing huge amount one spot 51 85 seems to be a potential pivot level for traders to be aware of Springboard to move higher or a broken support to accelerate to the downside towards 1.48 13 But let's have a think about the economic data we mentioned is not really much out today There isn't much out tomorrow you could cruel inventories as cruel Wednesday as ever last couple days That's come out that figure has been much higher than expected and crud has taken a bit of a tumble Let's see if the fourth week in a row will will make their reality It's not until Thursday. We've got a huge amount of CPI data Industrial production employment claims retail sales from the US that things start to get a bit more exciting in the macro Front and then Friday you at German GDP eurozone GDP tree parents from the eurozone and University of Michigan consumer sentiment Which isn't really that strong Thursday's your big day for macro events as ever keep your eye on the chart forum Make insights probably like going forward and join me again tomorrow to find out what happened next


This study found that traditional cooking methods in Powal district, Haryana, India produce high levels of particulate matter, PM, and carbon monoxide, CO. Additionally, the study showed that the philip stove was used more often and for longer periods of time than the aurya stove. The study also revealed that the philip stove was preferred over the aurya due to its ease of use and ability to meet local criteria for usability. This article was authored by Rupak Sankar Sambandham, Ajay Pillarizeti, and others.


And British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the meeting of G7 foreign ministers was a good opportunity to engage with India where coronavirus cases have surpassed 20 million. Health Ministry data showed with 3.45 million active cases, India recorded 357,229 new infections over the last 24 hours, while deaths rose by 3,449 to 222,408. With hospitals running out of beds and oxygen and morgues and crematoria overflowing, experts say the actual numbers could be five to ten times higher. We've been providing air concentrators, ventilators, things like that. Obviously there's a good opportunity because India is here to engage on all of those aspects. I think the important thing when you're going through the eye of the storm is to really listen to what they need. So obviously being able to meet and discuss that is a great opportunity. There's a much broader point and again a really valuable part of the G7 format is to think in the round. What do we do to help the most vulnerable countries around the world? I think COVAX and the ability to fund it, get vaccines to the most vulnerable countries. What we do about surplus domestic supply, all of those issues again a really good opportunity with the G7 together with our Indo-Pacific partners to talk all of that through and come up with positive answers.


What's up guys EvilD here and today I want to give you a little bit of a grammar lesson About the accusative case and movement because this is actually something I've had requested quite a bit from viewers of this channel And you know what I figured I'd get it done get you guys off my back so I can actually get on with the stuff I want to do no really I love you all I love you profunde Okay, so Basically when someone learns Esperano the first big hurdle they hit is the accusative case and when they hit it It's a good pounding if you don't understand grammar it pounded the hell out of me when I first Encounted it. I'm not making sexual references here at all. So just don't be dirty-minded Okay, so eventually they understand that the accusative applies to the object of the transitive verb Which meant nothing to me when I learned this language, but they get this in their head And they're like, okay, okay, I've got this I'm on a roll and then suddenly out of nowhere It's applied to people and locations which aren't direct objects of transitive verbs and they're like What's going on here What you need to understand is the accusative case doesn't just apply to the direct object of the transitive verb There's actually like three big areas of covers one is obviously the transitive The object of the transitive verb the second is the accusative case of movement the thing I'll cover in this lesson and the third one is like time quantities and stuff like that and I'll deal with that another day. So movement and the accusative case the best way to understand this is with a demo So let's look at your standard one that you'll probably see a lot So me eat us and la don't want it means I'm inside the house and I'm moving around now It literally translates as I go or I walk in the house notice It's in and not into so me eat us and la don't want means I'm in the house And I'm walking around but if you then say me eat us and la don't want notice how don't want goes to Domon you're now showing movement towards a location location being the house. So me eat us and la don't want Translate says I go into the house. Okay, so me eat us and la don't want means I'm in the house And I'm moving around me eat us and la don't want means I'm outside the house and I move into the house So let's say you're swimming in the ocean It's a lovely swim and you look down in the water and you notice there's a turtle below you Okay, and the word for turtle is test to the and you're looking at that turtle and God does it look juicy like just imagine No, okay, that's not what this is about. So you're looking at this turtle and it's swimming below you. Okay It's not swimming anywhere else. It's blow you and it's swimming around so you'd say la test to the Najas sub me so the turtles blow me and it's swimming around But if you wanted to say that the turtle swims say from in front or the sides or above Down under you you'd say la test to the Najas sub min I'm the destination of the movement. Okay, so la test to the Najas sub min means the turtle swims from above Under me and la La test to the Najas sub me means the turtles already below me and it's swimming around now Let's try one more example Let's say you've gotten out of the water You've eyed that turtle off enough and you're walking down the beach and you notice above you that there's I don't know a Vulture, I don't know why a vulture is following you maybe you're destined to die But there's a vulture above you and it's flying around you know how they do those all circles So the way to say the vulture flies above me. It's not from somewhere else It's just above me and flying around you'd say la vultura flugas super to me. Okay, but if you wanted to then say For instance, you're on the beach and you see that vulture and it's sitting on the sand in front of you And it's eyeballing you like you're my next meal mate And then it takes off and it flies above you from say on ground level then you would say la vultura Flugas super to min. Okay, because you again are the destination of the movement So that's basically it the accusative case when applied to something That's not for instance the transitive verb or time or quantity based is implying movement towards something Okay, now this seems probably a bit confusing at first But when you think about it English uses all these weird constructions like in and under or Into and then in and then it's kind of mixed up how we do it But with Esperanto it's actually quite clear cut once you've got it down Okay, so that's it if you've liked this video give it a like share it around with your friends subscribe to my channel If you haven't already and I'll see you in the next video and just to leave you hanging Try and translate this one for me Hi, so me name widows vinn and La Verronta film Me trovos vinn kai mi iras en vinn


Over in section 7, double A rivalry matchup in the first round between Aitken and Crosby-Irenton. Opening drive for the Rangers looked good until Jeremy Blasek intercepts a pass in the end zone for the Gobblers. End of the first quarter we're still scoreless until Luke Polarski scores on the run right up the middle to put Aitken up 8-0. But the Rangers were driving before half and Dakota Mitchell finds Nate Williams on the play-action. He brings it down to the one-yard line and a few plays later Mitchell would punch it in on the quarterback sneak. The Rangers trailed 8-6 but that would be their only touchdown as the Gobblers win 34-6.


and welcome back to the Creative Life from the American Creativity Association on St. Tech, Hawaii. I'm your host, Phyllis Glees, and our co-host today is Darlene Boyd. Today on the show, we will be discussing how to design innovative organizations. With our guest, Neal Gooderson. Neal is an entrepreneurial scientist who has spent over 35 years innovating how farming is done by creating new technologies in the agricultural industry. In the last seven of those years, he has worked with Cortiva Inc, and there he has focused particularly on designing the way an organization is structured to optimize innovation. We might find that very valuable in all of our own organizations and ways to apply. You can send questions also by email to questionsatlinktechhawaii.com. So, welcome, Neal, and let me start with you. I'm great to be here today. Right. What got you into being an entrepreneur in the farming industry? Well, Phyllis, you know, it's a long journey, and I started out in the early 80s coming out of grad school. I was trained as a biochemist, molecular biologist, and it was the early days of biotech. I was pretty enamored of that as a tool. And, you know, when I thought about being an academic, I thought, you know, I want to do something much more applied and directly impactful. And with biotech starting, I went to one of the early ag startups looking to use biotechnology to actually shift a bit, let's say, from chemistry to biological solutions for farmers. And so, that was one of the earliest things I got involved with. But as I worked in that startup, it was in Vansionetic Sciences, I realized, you know, the opportunity to make an impact, you know, you really needed to look at both technology and business. I worked at that company for about 18 years, ended up leading the R&D organization, and then went to a new startup that was focused on, again, another generation of biotech in ag, improving yields, improving stress tolerance, new tools for farmers. Was there for several years and actually was the CEO for seven years of the company called Mendel Biotech. And then I was attracted to and got a position at Pioneer Hybrid, one of the world's leading breeding organizations and seed companies, went there to lead a biotech group, lead the R&D organization, then to merge it with Corteva Hap. And in that time, as we formed one of the, you know, top two or three ag organizations around the world serving farmers very closely, I began to think a lot more about, as you noted, how do we structure an organization, a larger organization, a complex organization, in a way to optimize our ability to deliver value today for the farmers in our standard business, let's say, but also work towards the future needs of those farmers and the future technologies that could help us deliver on those needs. So pretty early on started to see the importance of doing both the kind of innovation idea of the small company and large companies developing cycles of products. So you would say that if we were going to say on today's show, what's the problem that you face, then how did you solve it? You actually looked at the organizational operations in the business that needed to get, they needed to get new products coming down the pipeline, they needed to get ready for their customers today, that might be showing up down the line. And part of this solving this problem, I'm going to throw out for the audience, the term ambidextrous innovation. And that's going to be something you're going to help us learn about today, and how does that help solve this problem of organizing a business for success and innovation? What is it? Yeah, so let's talk about ambidextrous innovation and how we came to this. There are two, let's just say, class kinds of innovation you might think of for companies. One of those is this sort of routine innovation that we do might call it sustaining innovation. The company that's been around a while will have a business model, how they serve their customers, and a set of products. And every year they're making better products. And they know, because the customers tell them, let's make this product a little better in this way. So that sort of delivery based innovation is more the province, let's say, of incumbents in a particular industry, with an existing business model that's working very well. And at the same time, or the alternative really is about, let's say, transformational innovation. And I grew up in that world as startups, right? That's what entrepreneurs do, they look at what's happening in the world, try to change it, try to transform it, bring new technology and new business models into the marketplace. Now an incumbent company, a big company, you know, should be doing work both for today, today's customers with today's products, but also anticipating the needs of their customers in the future. The customers are changing, the farmer is changing very much today, compared to what it was five or 10 years ago, demographics is going to change in the next 10 or 15 years. Who is the customer? How do we serve them? How do we anticipate their needs? And so therefore, how do we do both? Today's customers with today's products, tomorrow's customers with tomorrow's products, holding those two ideas, two ways of working, intention, that's the heart of ambidextrous innovation. And to make it work, you need the idea, but you then need to think about how do we structure the organization internally to be able to do both well? And I believe absolutely, you know, with all the conviction that the best companies in the world, the longest term lasting companies in the world will be those who can be ambidextrous innovators doing both today's innovation, sustaining and transformational innovation. Are these the same people or do you have side by side teams doing that? Yeah, it's interesting. You know, we, I think there are some people who like different kinds of, you know, sustaining innovation, right? Very clear path, very kind of really linear path. Maybe they're not so enamored of the uncertainty of a more transformational innovation. And there are some people who like, you know, the more startup type people, startup companies, startup ideas. And so you definitely can find in a larger organization, people who are attracted to each of those kinds of innovation. They work in parallel, right? But they also share ideas. And the technologies that might be developed in the core innovation group might be leveraged over to sustaining the transformational innovation. It's also a good journey for people, right, to learn different ways of innovating. One of the really important things is that you build independent and it's because what often happens at a big company is you get a set of projects. And what you find is that any individual project has a high probability of success. It's a small improvement. It's going to generate value for the business. And instead of funding a project like that, you find a higher risk or transformational project. On the surface of it, that project is worth less, right? And so you'll always favor the sustaining innovations. That's what big companies do. That's the innovator's dilemma, as Clayton Christensen called it, in essence. But if you have a portfolio of innovations that are high risk, some of those probably won't get in the market. Others will be kind of neutral in the market, but some will be huge winners in the market. And so it's the portfolio of sustaining innovation and a portfolio of transformational innovation that really is at the heart of doing ambidextrous innovation. When you talk about these teams, might you be able to clarify how do you determine the membership of the teams? Do individuals just emerge as being appropriate for the present or in the future? Or can you tell just a little bit more about the membership? Yeah, that's a great question. And as I said earlier, some people have more of an affinity for one type or another. The level of uncertainty, the level of risk is different in the transformational side sometimes. But part of it is identifying the right people within the organization who have that aptitude and then training them. The way that we had done that at Corteva was to treat the portfolio of transformational innovation more or less the way a venture firm would treat its portfolio of companies, different ways of thinking about the marketplace. You don't necessarily evaluate a project's value based on a single, net present value of the future sales of a product. For venture, you look at what's the total market opportunity? What's the technology risk? What's the time to get to the market? So we train people to think differently. We train people to also to partner very closely. Oftentimes, standing innovations are mostly about technology. And so scientists are probably the prime drivers. But this transformational innovation is much more a partnership like a startup would be between business thinkers, commercial thinkers, marketers, and technology innovators. And so we also try to find people who really want to work together and scientists who learn more about the business and vice versa. So Neely, you have some show and tell for us today. We're starting, I think you did some of your most innovative work at Corteva. And do you have something to show us that give us a sense of what this firm looks like? It's getting this ambidextrous, innovative organizational leadership. Absolutely. Well, let me let me let's start with one video. There's a second that maybe helps tell the story too. But the first one, which we call transforming the farm, is about the disruptive innovation unit itself. And it was about some of the disruptive opportunities and ideas, but also about the people and the way they work. So let's have a look at that one. This little black box can turn our growers into scientists, bringing the science right into their field. We need to learn and understand as much about bees as possible. Farmers can have access to all the satellite data at a resolution, which is second to none. For many people, change is uncomfortable. It's a scary word. But for these people, it's what they live for. Some of the most innovative ideas in the world today are happening right here in agriculture. Corteva has created a team of people dedicated to changing agriculture. And we want to not just experience it, we want to lead that disruption, disrupt ourselves, disrupt the industry. We have some brilliant scientists and technologists working on problems that farmers don't even know they have yet. We're designing the future of agriculture by deploying the latest technologies to the farm. You learn fast, you move fast. The really innovative stuff we're doing includes bee-friendly insecticides and robotics and artificial intelligence and alternative proteins and new satellite imaging tools. The accuracy and the speed and the resolution at which we get information from either satellites or a drone. It makes decision making extremely powerful. Fingerprinting our plants gives us the ability to understand what's hitched along for the ride. And often that's a disease. It saves money. It saves time. It saves resources. It's fun. You get a chance to innovate. You get a chance to create new things that have some sort of benefit down the road for either growers or consumers. It's a fun group of scientists to work with. We can win for farmers, we can win for the consumer, we can win for the planet. Agriculture can be much better than it is today and we're committed to delivering that. We took us into the future there and from all places, from farming, the oldest industry in the world. Fingerprinting a plant. The lady walked in at the beginning with a black box. Do you send people that you train these scientists who are thinking innovatively? Do you outsource them to the farm? Are they doing that? Is that how this happens? Do you disrupt existing farms by planting your disruptors across the industry? You send them out into the field like bees? Well, fellas, it's a good point that if you're going to understand farming, you better get out into a farm and you better talk to farmers and understand what's the pain point on the farm, what are the challenges that they really face that we're actually solving real problems that farmers care about. Some people work in the lab on lab stage of problems, but we did have this philosophy of co-developing innovation with farmers, testing ideas directly on farmers' fields and engaging them early on in a dialogue about not so much what they think it's like the iPhone. No one thought about the iPhone. You couldn't say to someone, what do you need in the future? But you could understand what their problems were, and that's why Apple kept with an iPhone. It was a way of solving those problems. So, yes, people go out on the field, work in the labs, and agriculture farming is sometimes one of the least sexy industries around. I think one of the reasons is that a farm looks a lot the same as it did 50 years ago, right? They're still plants in the field and they're growing and unlike phones go from old and computers from old to very modern looking, sort of sexier to do that. But as you can tell from that video, hopefully everyone can, the level of information and technology being deployed on the farm to make farmers' lives better is extraordinary. And to do that does require still this kind of innovation. And, you know, people who are doing more of this transformational innovation are learning from the experiences of the commercial market at Bay of Corteva. They're learning from the experiences of their colleagues in the sustaining innovations because they'll see some problems, right? That can be picked up by those folks working in the disruptive unit. And you've got a feel for those people, right? These are just some of our, you know, creative scientists who have a little passion for a different kind of challenge. And it's fun as well as important for the farmers around the world. You know, if I may, maybe this is a good time to share the second video because I think it gives you another flavor on, as you'll see in this video, the importance of listening not just to the farmer, but to the consumer. And that's part of the theme of this disruptive way of thinking about farming, but also showcases a few more of the kinds of ideas and new concepts. So if we can go ahead and do the table of the farm video, that would be great. We all know who runs a farm. The one who calls the shots, decides what to grow, and how to grow it. But it's not just farmers. It's Sophia. That's right. Sophia, a new kind of consumer who's informed and empowered and knows exactly what she wants to eat and how she wants it grown. In addition to everything else that can make farming so unpredictable, weather, pests, volatile markets, and trade disruptions, farmers must now respond to changing consumer demands. The supply chain is flipping and consumers like Sophia aren't at the end of it. They're at the beginning. We call it table to farm agriculture. It's the future of farming and it's what we're working on right now. It starts with our seeds, bred to be as resilient and productive as the people who grow them. And new targeted breeding technologies like CRISPR that promise to help farmers adapt to demanding consumers and equally demanding conditions. With the right tools, farmers can do more than react to change. They can anticipate it. We're pioneering virtual farming to help farmers prototype new ways of growing before they even plant a seed. When we overlay different kinds of data, we're helping farmers make smarter, faster decisions across the farm. Environmental and historical data to know which seeds to plant where and when. Drone and satellite imagery to pinpoint where crop protection is needed. Weather data and artificial intelligence to generate higher yields with a lower environmental impact. It's the dawn of a new agricultural revolution driven by consumers and built on sustainability. At Corteva AgroScience, we're developing integrated whole farm solutions that are reinventing the world's oldest industry as one of the most modern. With Table to Farm agriculture, farmers, Sophia and our planet all win and we all keep growing. Okay, I think a keyword for me is I watched the video was anticipate and I think we may go through a process of creative problem solving. Success often can be measured upon the anticipation of what those problems are. Talk to me a little bit about that. Yeah, no, I think that's that's vital and you know what I think the commercial organizations of many companies often do is understand what the problems people have and what features they want to see improved in their current product. The bigger challenge is to think about the nature of the problems that people face and sometimes I know in some companies they hire sociologists to go out and sit with their customers right and understand what the true problems are. So yeah and farming is a long horizon business. It takes a long time to develop the new products for farmers so you want to look out 15, 20 years. What's then what are the needs going to be? Let's anticipate as I said earlier the demographic changes in farmers. I mean, give you an example you know in North America today the average farmer is probably 55 to 60 years old, still predominantly male. We would expect in 15, 20 years the farmer to be much more gender diverse, younger and much more tech savvy. So think about how we're all used to interacting with products and services on our computer you know getting ideas proposed to us by Amazon or others right based on our buying habits. I think the farmer the future is going to want to be served in some similar ways. That's how they're going to grow up in this world right being served differently than ever before. And so I think this does inform the kinds of innovations and and transformational business models that I think companies are exploring today. So anticipation is a really key word. A great call out Arlene. Thank you. Am I am I correct to assume that there still is a pattern of farming that's passed on from generation to generation? And I would suspect perhaps that there's a rigidity because of that knowing to change. Farming is definitely generational right and the best farmers really take care of their land protect their land you know their children maybe grow up in the farm go off come back. I think you see a bit more of that perhaps even today. But more importantly you know farming is a pretty conservative you know operation conservative business why because if you make one mistake try some new technology in a backfires. You're a small company owner as a farmer your entire company can crater if you make a bad choice. That was behind my question that the pattern of creativity that the new generations coming in perhaps they were more open. Yes I think I think there are problems appropriately. Yep growing generation of new tech savvy farmers who are open to trying things. I mean to some extent these are on computers right you you can predict for a farmer what what their farm might look like and how it might perform on a computer and share that with a grower. You can offer them new services right drones that spray chemicals and measure things on their farm. And one of the key drivers I think also of the next generation is a passionate interest in sustainability in improving the environment in which we farm and which we live. And so there's a lot of receptivity to farmers farming carbon sequestering carbon to mitigate and climate change. So those are some of the features that lead to the need for ambidextrous innovation because there is so much change going on on the farm. Well thank you let's take ourselves down the street now and I understand now that you've left for Teva you're working on an international board that is catalyzing these ideas into other industries and then maybe even into developing countries in other ways. So you want to talk a little bit about that Neil. Sure I'd be delighted to do that. You know these ideas of ambidextrous innovation they're I think they're very broad and very important for many large organizations that have current businesses and future businesses customers are changing. And so and you can see that you know some of the companies that we know best in you know whether it's a Google or an Apple or a Netflix and Amazon these are companies that have done a great job of driving continual improvement in some of their business segments and then also innovating to create new and different business segments. When I went off and when I retired at the end of last year I had actually just joined the board of the CGIAR. It's an international organization whose purpose is to serve mobile holder farmers and low-income companies to help them become more profitable organization. The CG for short is going through its own transformation as an organization. It draws on a number of centers around the world now getting organized as one integrated innovation organization. And will you realize these same principles apply here as well even though this is a non-for-profit essentially serving small holder farmers on behalf of governments around the world and other funders. There are some things that the group does that's early routine the next generation of foreign products or millet products you know for the farmer or you know the Kato's whatever it might be but also working on new ways of serving farmers right. So there's a need for both system transformation at an organization like the CGIAR serving small holder farmers around the world and there's a need for more routine sustaining innovation. And so I'm you know working with at the board level and with some of the management to think about okay what's the right approach to designing innovation in the CGIAR. Leveraging those same principles knowing the answers may be a little different but I think the principles of the need for different portfolios different kinds of people they're still very much germane and I think that sort of approach to innovation will make the CGIAR even more successful and effective in improving the livelihoods of small holder farmers than it's ever been. It's a very exciting journey for me to bring that. If you would I I wonder how someone prepares to position themselves to be on a farm as a data scientist or as an AI you know our our kids are going to school and they're learning all the computer science degrees and ways to use it and they're thinking about high tech. How do you cultivate this generation that are going to have to become high tech savvy and then take it into the farm that's not what they're thinking. How are you grooming these innovators? Yeah you know it's um I think farming and agriculture and food it's kind of a calling so some people are just drawn to it. Many people come off the farm originally and your point about Dave is that an important one right the farming world is a wash and data right we can now have satellites that can look down and resolution of a few meters and see what's happening on a farm. We have drones that can get resolution down to the you know centimeter level and look at each plant in the field and so I think um the the challenge of using information in really sophisticated way on the farm is attracting people who maybe wouldn't have been attracted 20 years ago to the farm and to farming as a practice and to innovating for farmers. I think we can offer farmers simplicity, convenience, the ability to predict what's going to happen on their farm and make much much better decisions and and do it in a more sustainable way in a combination of things is really attractive to actually a growing group of younger scientists and innovators and we see it in the small companies that are growing up in agriculture as well as in the larger companies. Does a does a farm need a middleman like Carteva or your nonprofit to know how to attract and manage these I mean I wouldn't imagine that a generation third generation farmer would even know how to talk to and manage and and actually feed the needs of this kind of worker. Are they full-time or are they contract? How do you bring this into your culture? Yeah I mean I think you know I think farmers are more and more sophisticated actually so um that's happening in real time. People are learning and becoming more savvy with technology but um I think it is important that because farming is so complex complicated an individual individual decision that looks appealing right you want to become more sustainable but you don't want to lose money while you do a new practice so I think you know AI data tools computational tools is a really important that companies can invest in those on behalf of a large number of customer or farmers and then bring some of the best of that technology to farmers um and farmers are engaging you know regularly now right with small company innovators large company innovators. I think we talked about this as the co-design it's a really powerful um an important opportunity. Oh thank you and darling I know you have questions and I see us down on the last minute of our time. My thanks for the experience I certainly will look at my salad differently this evening and I think we've learned a lot. I did a great session quite a bit. So I think we'll leave it there. The audience you've been watching the creative life on Think Tech Hawaii today darling Boyd and I have been discussing ambidextrous innovation for the global food system and how to enable farmers around the world to be more sustainable and productive and we've been learning all this from our guest Neil Gutherson. Thanks for participating Neil and Darlene and thanks to all you viewers for tuning in. I'm Phyllis Bleece and we'll be back in two weeks with another edition of The Creative Life. Aloha.


Hello everyone. I'd like to begin by thanking Prime Minister Gentiloni and the Italian people for the incredibly warm welcome they've extended to me and to the entire Canadian delegation. It's a pleasure to be here. In the last few weeks, Paolo and I have had the chance to meet on multiple occasions, first in Ottawa, then more recently at NATO and the G7, and we just wrapped up another productive meeting right here in Rome. It was an opportunity for us not only to further strengthen the close partnership that has long existed between Italy and Canada, but to talk about how we can work together to improve the lives of Italian and Canadian families. First, we discussed the importance of trade. As you know, I was joined by business leaders on this trip. The visit was a good opportunity for us to discuss how we can expand opportunities and create good, well-paying middle-class jobs on both sides of the Atlantic while working with our Italian partners. In just a few weeks, CETA will come into provisional application, and this is great news for Europeans and Canadians. An ambitious and truly modern trade deal, CETA will reduce trade barriers between Canada and its European partners, making it cheaper for Canadian families to buy European products, and creating more opportunities for entrepreneurs to do business. I'm pleased that CETA has recently taken another important step towards ratification in Italy, and we hope that the process will be completed as quickly as possible. The Prime Minister and I look forward to finalizing this progressive trade deal for the benefit of both Canadians and Europeans. Second, we talked about our common approach to issues of regional and international security. Building on some of the conversations we had at the G7 Summit, we discussed the challenges Italy faces as migrants continue to arrive on its shores. I commend Italy for its commitment to support refugees and to help address the crises that have forced countless families out of their homes. Third, the Prime Minister and I reiterated our commitment to fight in climate change. There is no doubt that global warming is the most pressing issue of our time, and as international leaders, we must do more to make our economies greener and our planet cleaner. Italy and Canada, along with our partners, have already taken meaningful steps to address this by signing the Paris Agreement, and we remain committed to its implementation. And finally, I had the chance to visit the city of Amatrice during my time here in Italy. I saw firsthand the devastation caused by the earthquake and the rebuilding efforts that are currently underway. In the wake of those horrible events, the Government of Canada announced just a few weeks ago that it would be donating up to $2 million in matching funds to help the people of Amatrice during this difficult time. The support shown by the Italian-Canadian community to rebuild this beautiful town is a powerful reminder of the historic ties that unite our two countries and a testament to our long-standing friendship. Our strong relationship is, after all, based on shared values like compassion and generosity, and it is in this spirit that we decided to step up, not only as strong allies but as friends. Prime Minister Gentiloni and I will continue our joint work until the end of Italy's mandate to the President of the G7. We will also continue to work together during the next to resolve some of the most urgent challenges that we face, especially concerning the autonomy of women and girls. I am impatient to welcome our G7 partners in Charlevoix next year for what I am sure will be another productive summit. Once again, I want to thank you all for joining us today. I am very grateful to the G7 President for his leadership in the G7. We will continue to work together throughout the rest of Italy's G7 Presidency and well into ours to address some of the most pressing challenges we face, including women and girls empowerment. I am very much looking forward to all for joining us today. I want to again thank the Italian people for their incredibly warm friendship and welcome.


hey everyone before I get into today's video I want to remind you to enter our trials of mana giveaway all you have to do is subscribe to the channel hit that bell icon and set to all notifications comment down below and like this video doing so it gets you one entry and you can enter in every single video released in the month of April and the winner will be announced on the last day of this month you can get a copy for any platform that the trials of mana remake happens to be releasing on it doesn't just need to be switched and it will be a us copy so just keep that in mind it'll be a digital code hey everyone I got a couple things I want to talk to you about today but first off it feels good to be back and you might notice some differences behind me but maybe we'll go over that more in a live stream or something later I really want to get into the news we have a couple cool things to talk about one of them is crisis remastered coming to switch it's coming by way of saber interactive who is working on all of the ports of crisis remastered to all of the various systems playstation 4 pc xbox one etc they're also working on the switch version and as I said they handled witcher 3 coming to switch and witcher 3 I think we can all admit is one of the most impressive third party switch ports so I think it's safe to say that it's in pretty good hands saber interactive is quickly becoming kind of like another panic button in terms of bringing games to switch so it's going to be interesting to see how this game performs on switch how it compares to other versions all that it's just another impressive port coming to a switch so that's cool but what I want to spend a majority of this video talking about isn't so much how awesome it is to see another amazing third party switch port come because that's great especially in an arrow or a really a time period when a lot of games are being delayed it's what nintendo might have cooking for a mid gen upgrade switch you know like switch pro or potentially next gen let's get into that and this news comes the way of games radar as you can see here it says a new switch with a second display is teased in the system's latest update so there was a brand new update to nintendo switch that came out in the past week added a whole bunch of new features and stuff to the os an operating system it didn't give us folders like we've all wanted for a while but um there's been some interesting stuff discovered in it and it says it looks like the latest nintendo switch system what they may include early references to a new model of console with a second display now the big thing here is that it still seems to be an x1 uh so a taeger x1 so it's not like a new chip that's why i'm thinking a mid gen or like a new type of switch i'm not sure here uh the references was discovered by seasoned system digger mike haskin who shared the results digging into switches new 10.0.0 firmware on twitter according to haskin the firmware adds preliminary support for a new model with the codename nx abcd and if you look at what it says firmware 10.0 and for limited support for the model nx dash abcd three of the five new d ram profiles are for this new hardware type and there's evidence a secondary display of sorts is being added exclusive on this model now the big news from that is nintendo's dabbled in two screens before ds 3ds uh are we gonna get a switch that has a fold out second display that is an interesting thing to kind of go back to that um or i don't know i don't know what else it could be to be completely honest um popping abcd at the end of old development codename for switch sounds like the most made up thing ever but it actually lines up with previously discovered codenames for switch and switch dev kits uh like the switch light was nx abca nx abca2 nx abcb and the nx abcc so it's actually um like right in line with what nintendo has done for codenames before um obviously uh the new switch model is that talk of a second display nintendo is an old hand of adding uh second screens of things but there's no guarantee looking at a ds or dual screen arrangement in this case it could be a smaller screen used for menus or notifications for instances a screen on the back so that people on the bus could watch you play uh you never know nintendo does really crazy things uh with their with their technology and their ideas now personally uh i i'm not that excited by the prospect of a second screen or an extra screen um you know even if it's just to like display little things um in a menu sort of way i i i presume if they're gonna do second screen it's gonna be a flip out screen but i i honestly don't want nintendo to go this route and i i hate saying this to all of you uh ds and 3ds fans out there which i am of one you mean i got some you know in in the background i got you know multiple 3ds and ds is just i i'm kind of done with that design i really like switch the way that switch is right now and i think you know in terms of any sort of mid gen upgrade if they're not going to really beef up the hardware which is what a lot of us i think hope they would do with the switch pro then i think what we'd rather see is just a more industrialized switch of a higher quality made switch product maybe one that even uses vapor chamber cooling and doesn't have a fan at all so get rid of a point of failure in the system so this more rigid joycons that are better designed uh without the plastic locks and without the joycon drift i think a lot of us you know could accept a mid gen upgrade that's literally just a more durable you know higher quality built nintendo switch but that's just not what we seem to be getting it looks like you know we might be getting more powerful hardware which you know has been rumored for a long time and it's hard to even imagine a switch pro at this point coming out this year after the pandemic and switches being sold out everywhere including in japan and so i don't know that uh any plans for that are happening this year and maybe that changes plans in general and all of this is for a next gen switch but then why would the references still be for a tiger x1 unless the next gen switch prototypes are maybe just using the tiger x1 as a placeholder for now the new tech is ready who knows this could mean a million things but the code name lines right up with all the code names they've used in the past for various variations of the nintendo switch from switch lights and the og switch and obviously the revised switches which is the switch i'm using right now has it's just like the original switch with longer battery life essentially that's the main benefit to consumers anyways there's some changes on the chip level as well to try to make hacking harder and all that but yeah i'm honestly pretty excited about any idea of new hardware at all this is really the first time since references to switch light that we have had any indication that nintendo is working on new hardware of any type officially within the software so this is really cool to see that the latest updates to switch the 10.0.0 update is clearly referencing something nintendo is playing around with and potentially getting ready to give to developers some sort of new model of switch that is something a little different the d ram profiles i think are interesting and that they're exclusive to that it could it could refer that there's going to be more d ram or faster d ram or something coming up in a new model as well so that could be a reference to higher specs although there's not really a different clock speed profiles so i don't know what's up with that and the it could be the x1 plus which is basically just a taker x1 that's just i guess bend and whatever better like it it's kind of like the 9900ks where it's like it's like the best of the best 9900k chips like guaranteed to run at a certain speed i don't know maybe it's something like that but i'm pretty stoked and i actually want to know are you guys like even excited anymore for any potential new switch hardware whether it's the switch pro with new uh you know upgraded beefier hardware better screen or if you're excited for this dual screen concept um are you know or are you just kind of happy with the way switch is with everything that's going on in the world all we really care about is just surviving getting through this together and then you know just having some games to play obviously i think we can all agree animal crossing came out at the perfect time and it's probably even though it was going to be a massive success it definitely helps that it's like one of the only major games to come out that in doom eternal uh all the doom eternal sales i guess i'm in that great maybe everyone's waiting for the switch version maybe that's the thing like because we know a switch version of doom eternal is coming so maybe that'll end up being a big seller who knows right now a lot of things are delayed the next game i'm really looking forward to is ninjala i'm gonna have a video going up on that i think next week kind of a my take on ninjala from when i played it at e3 a couple years ago combined with all the some of the new details we have for the game including that they're doing like a kind of a beta test sort of thing coming up at the end of the month that you know we can all kind of try the game out and it's free to play so i don't know there's something that i'll dive into next week so that's kind of the next big game big game for me anyways that i'm anticipating for switch but yeah i don't know a lot of people they're playing final fantasy 7 remake as well seen reviews pop up for that so people are really enjoying that darin actually just talked about it on the podcast yesterday there's no darin's just a buddy of mine from back in the zelda informer days who talked about it on the nintendo prime podcast be sure to go check that out if you haven't yet otherwise that's what i got for you guys today i hope you really enjoyed the video it feels good to be back doing a little bit of something i have a lot of ideas and a lot of things i need to flesh out it's just a time thing right now i am homeschooling all three of my children that are in three different grades at three different schools it's crazy but today they didn't really have much to do so today you got a video and i'm pretty happy with it so i think that's what you're doing and be sure to enter that trials amount of giveaway by commenting down below liking the video subscribing and hitting that bell icon otherwise thank you guys so much for tuning in i am nathan erlpagens from nintendo prime and i'll catch each and every single one of you in the next video


Everyone in this world seems to have his own special problems. Yet they are all the same, and must be recognized as one if the one solution that solves them all is to be accepted. Who can see that a problem has been solved if he thinks the problem is something else? Even if he is given the answer, he cannot see it's relevance. That is the position in which you find yourself now. You have the answer, but you are still uncertain about what the problem is. A long series of different problems seem to confront you, and as one is settled the next one and the next arrives. There seems to be no end to them. There is no time in which you feel completely free of problems and at peace. That is a good starting point for us. Whether we talk about personal issues and problems, perhaps there are feelings of anger or hatred or grievances with a person, or perhaps there are medical problems or seeming problems with the body, different aches and pains or different diseases and sicknesses, or whether we are talking more on a collective scale of social issues, abortion and gay rights or on and on and so on and so forth, there seems to be a wide array of problems.  The first thing we have to do to really talk about bringing it back to the mind is kind of get into a little bit of a discussion about what is the mind and how is that differentiated from the world that the eyes see and the ears hear. The world of change and constant fluctuation and so on and so forth. And we have a term mind. I think it would be helpful to start out by saying the mind is not contained in the world. The mind is not analogous to the brain. But the mind is, you could use a Course in Miracles definition, the activating agent of spirit. It is very powerful. It is the place where the mechanism of decision making is contained within the mind. And it is abstract. There is nothing that we can use as a metaphor or a real good analogy that is in the world because the mind is not limited in everything in the world that we see as limited and fragmented in some way. So maybe we can just take a particular type of an issue that you have or a question that you have for a particular and work it back using our framework that we just set up that there are no problems apart from the mind. Why don't we take what I was looking at last week when I was staying with the boys and being in an environment that was much noisier and much more active than I often am. And just having the thought that I still need to be in a quiet, external environment to have my internal environment quiet. I noticed I still had that belief that in some way my internal state of mind was dependent on the volume level or the activity level and the external condition. Okay, so you've perceived the problem as a problem of environment. If we bring that back to the mind and we begin our discussion with the presenting problem is that there are certain circumstances or situations that you're perceiving that are outside of yourself that are undesirable. And if we bring it back to the metaphysics, of course, you see that one of the basic premises is there's nothing outside of you and that the inner world and the outer world are not different but are actually one and the same and simultaneous. And the belief that they are different sets up a situation or a conflict in that it would be better or more conducive to me if I were in a different situation or a different place. So it gets down to that belief that, first of all, that I'm in the environment. I mean, I think if we look and we listen to our words that they really convey what we believe and they can be used as trigger points or as clues to what we really believe to, first of all, to believe that one is in an environment it gets back to the belief that I am a person who is in the world and moving distinct from the world. There's a belief that I'm a person I can act on the world and the world can act on me. And in a sense, the deepest sense, we have a subject, object split. You know, the I, I am a subject in the world. I, you know, the I, I am a subject in the world. I subjectively perceive the world. I have feelings, I have emotions, I have likes, I have dislikes. I have the ability to make decisions as a person and the belief as other people have the ability to make decisions as a person. And so, in the Alderman sense, it's that split between subject and object that gets to the uncomfortableness that you feel in those situations. What, what a lot of seeming activity or noise levels and so on and so forth. The, the problem as defined in the world seems to be, you know, if it was quieter or if it was less activity then I could be at peace. My mind at least could be worse still than otherwise. And so when we listen to how that's described in that definition it's obvious that, that the state of mind, or the peace of mind is dependent on the environment in that case. And to take it one step further as we've just done the environment is something that is not me, that is apart from me. That isn't, in a sense, objectified. There is something that we can call an objectifiable environment. For instance, the house and the boys that you were staying with is being part of that objectifiable environment in which I find myself. That's where this split comes in between the inner and the outer in my mind. It's a very basic split. It's a subject-object split and the subject is seen to be a person and then the object can be another object, another person, the environment. Everything outside of me, in other words, what I perceive as me. Right. Everything outside of what you perceive as you. So in a sense, there's the split that's taking place. And this split is in the mind. This is a choice. This is a way of perceiving that the mind has chosen. Now, to fuse the split, to see no duality between one's self and the world can seem to be like a big leap. It can seem to be unfathomable. It can seem at times to be impossible. It can seem to be as if there's no experiential grounding or basis for that. That can be an idea and so on and so forth. But really, the first step in really transcending that split or letting that split go in the mind is to take a little bit of a look at the dynamics of why. If it's a very basic split that I have chosen to make, why does the mind make that split? And do you have any idea of that from any of our previous discussions? Why, what purpose does it serve the mind to split into a subject-object? Well, I think all the duality that's projected is the mind's attempt to relieve the pressure, as it were, from trying to maintain within it two different and opposing and conflicting thought systems. And so the mind tries to throw one outside of itself and attempt to just ease that and make it feel more comfortable and more manageable and less conflictual. And in throwing it outside of itself, that's how the duality is set up. That then the duality is experienced as being outside the mind instead of inside the mind where it's intolerable. And it doesn't really go away inside the mind, but there's kind of a pseudo-belief or misconception that it will in some way relieve that conflict in the mind to get it outside of itself. You say intolerable. I mean, are you gaining a sense of the force of the mind, of the strength of this intolerance in the sense that as you go along moment by moment and you do experience these instances of wanting to define the problem in the world, it has to be an indicator that there is a tremendous amount of fear or there is something that is really attempting to be run from or hid from or avoided to continually continue the projecting game of blaming or of, in all kinds of ways, trying to define the problem in the world. The mind insistently trying to define the problem over and over and over again as being in the world. Are you talking about just the fear, the basic fear that's in the mind, the fear of God, the fear of love and the fear of the punishment that's deserving from the guilt that comes from. The fear that having separated from God. Yeah, and that can seem very abstract or a lot of times a common thing is people say I'm not in touch with that. I don't really see that I'm afraid of God or I'm afraid of love. The metaphysical connections that you've made, this is what it comes down to in this hypothetical or presenting problem that we're talking about of wanting the environment to be in some way different. You know, in some way stating the problem is I'm not at peace and I could be at peace if something were different in my environment and it's not throwing it out. It's like one teeny sliver or one presenting problem of that, but this is the core of what goes on in this world as a defense against coming to know that there's only one problem. So is that a question? No. Oh, okay.


The story so far is that Newton took his first law from Galileo who said that if you don't apply a force to something It doesn't change its velocity and then he developed his second law Which makes the first law really just a special case of his second law Which tells you exactly how things accelerate when you apply forces to them So the mass times acceleration is equal to the sum of the forces acting on something So if you want to know how something moves or you need to know is all the forces and Newton's second law is correct Provided you don't go too fast so that relativity becomes important Well, you don't look at things that are too small so that quantum mechanics becomes important So it's a very very powerful tool for calculating things but you do need to know all the forces that apply to things and One of the ways to help that is to look at Newton's third law, which tells us an important rule that forces have to obey Fundamentally all forces come from interactions So a force arises where you have something here. I have something a and something else Be and they have some kind of interaction Now we only know of a few fundamental kinds of interactions. We know about gravity. We know about electromagnetism We know about the nuclear strong force and the nuclear weak force But all forces no matter where they come from all follow Newton's third law a Newton's third law says that all forces come in pairs So the force on particle a due to particle B has to be paired with an equal and opposite force on particle B due to particle a So in other words, you've got one force going one way one force going the other way They're exactly the same magnitude so if you to add them up you'll get zero and that's Newton's third law So you can get examples anytime you have any kind of force and indeed every time you have a force You can do an example of Newton's third law. Let's start with if you're lifting a book So if you lift a book There's a force by you to push up the book and there's a force by the book pushing down on your hand It's a handbook interaction or you might have a plane if you have a plane's propeller There you have the plane pushing on the air the propeller pushes the air and also the air pushes the plane That's how the plane goes forward It's a propeller air interaction. You might have a swimmer in water The reason the swimmer pushes on the water is in order for the reaction the water pushing on the person to push them forward It's a person water interaction Well, you might have a cricketer and if the cricketer hits a cricket ball Then the ball experiences a big force But the bat experiences an equal and opposite force and that's why she has to hold it very firmly and also hit the ball Right the middle so that it doesn't twist in her hands due to the bat ball interaction So in each of these cases all you have to do is figure out what two things are interacting and that tells you how to apply Newton's third law And the force between the two things is going to be equal and opposite Now there are some very common misconceptions that people fall into when they look at Newton's third law The first is when a big thing interacts with a small thing that the big thing applies a bigger force For example, if you step on a blade of grass Then yes, there's a very large force on that blade of grass from the your body weight But in fact, there's an equal and opposite force from that blade of grass up on you But even though that force is equal the same force would do a lot more to a blade of grass than it will do to a foot And so the real way this works is that big things respond to forces less sensitively than small things The next misconception is that a force is something that an object can have for example a big magnet People might say has a big magnetic force or the earth they might say has a large gravitational force But the reality is that all forces come in pairs and they're the interaction between two objects So a big magnet doesn't have a big force a big magnet and something else can exert an equal and opposite force on each other Which may or may not be big and similarly the earth doesn't have a large gravitational force The earth and some other mass together can exert a mutual equal and opposite Gravitational force on each other the third misconception is that balanced forces on an object exists because of Newton's third law So for example if I'm standing on the earth and there's a force of gravity on me Pulling me down and there's a force due to the ground pushing me up is often called the normal force and The fact that I'm neither accelerating up into the sky nor down through the earth means that the normal force is exactly equal and opposite To the gravitational force and that's why I stand still But those are not the Newton's third law equal and opposite forces because they're both acting on me In fact, they come from two different interactions the interaction from the gravity is because of the existence of the earth And it's enormous mass and me it's a gravitational Attraction between me and the earth so the equal and opposite force from Newton's third law for that is My pull on the earth so I'm pulling the earth up Gravitationally just as the earth is pulling me down and the interaction for the normal force is the existence of the ground If I was instead standing on water then I would find that the gravity would indeed accelerate me downwards And so the Newton's third law pair for that is my force on the ground if I was standing on thin ice Then that force would break the ice and so the normal force is about the interaction between me and the actual surface I'm standing on and the gravitational force is between my mass and the earth's mass So because Newton's law describes forces on two objects And there's only ever one of those forces on each object they can never balance so they never balance on an object If they could then what Newton's third law would be saying is that there's always an equal and opposite force on that same object And so there'd be no such thing as force. They'd always cancel But they don't always cancel if I'm pushing on someone someone's pushing on me We both get pushed we get pushed in equal and opposite directions, but there's definitely pushing happen on each of us