ppen what is needed and then using that to inform decisions around what projects should we take forward where do we need to start doing pre construction engineering and when to actually take projects to an off-gen for approval for the overall to actually take them forward and that's quite important because if you're looking at say you know when do we start worrying about a scenario about say early nuclear closure in Scotland that's quite a hard decision because it's one that you'll probably always get wrong you know it's you know sort of so you know is it better to invest early to be on the safe side and then turn out you actually built lots of stuff you didn't really need or is it better to sort of like leave it and rely on other solutions coming along which might be quite expensive that those are not straightforward solutions we are trying to put the mechanism in place a deal with it in the past off-gem has accepted a concept we called anticipatory investment effectively investing before we knew we need it but in anticipation and I suspect we'll probably have to continue to use those sort of mechanisms it in the past has been a good mechanism that's why western link has been come forward in a timely manner because we started it before we really needed it before we really knew we needed it and actually you know we did need it so actually it's going to be beneficial flowing in both ways you know was again previously been talked about can I come in again I mean it's a it's a very good question because your question is really is the regime for planning and delivering these network assets appropriate and it's a good question because as we said you know the companies are investing about seven billion pounds worth in transmission assets over the current price control period so that eight years between 2013 and 2021 and we looked at this as part of the ITPR project which others have referred to it stands for integrated transmission planning and regulation we looked at exactly that question and our findings were there could be some improvements and we took our decisions on that earlier this year it was spring this year it's a bit hard to tell the seasons these days but so it was spring this year and what we decided was that we wanted a stronger role so as Mike said they produced the future energy scenarios which sets out what generation is likely to come on and then the transmission owners look at this consider developments in their own areas and they bring forward proposals for transmission build in light of that importantly and this is the boring tech tech part but very important part in their licenses they have the obligation to develop a system that is economic and efficient and what that means is bringing forward proposals that are built to deliver the energy and for us to assess in a timely manner so they have that obligation on them the changes we made to the regime for planning and delivering the system were firstly to give the system operator a stronger role in looking at these options and assessing whether those indeed are the best options that the transmission companies come forward with are there other another level of scrutiny you know are there are there other ways in which this can be done more efficiently both through actually managing the system more efficiently or through build because that's some of the trade-offs that the companies need to think really hard about is you know does it always need lots of big kit like pylon and undergrounding or are there other ways in which we can manage the system more effectively so we want the system operator to engage more closely with the transmission companies in doing that so that was that was what we did on the planning side on the delivery side again we think things can be done better and that set out in our proposals in particular to drive down costs to consumers we think there is a role for bringing more competition into building onshore transmission network so what we have said is where there are large new separable transmission projects these can potentially be tendered out and delivered by competitive parties and the evidence this is it's a controversial decision but we looked very very carefully at this we looked at evidence from what's happened in the offshore regime here evidence for other from other countries and came to the firm conclusion that this this can deliver benefits to consumers not in all projects not in small complicated projects that are part of the very mesh networks but for very big separable projects there are benefits in bringing more competition into the market here and pushing prices down and ultimately consumer bills and it's too early to know whether that might happen in other words whether serious bids might come in from new potential yeah so we are looking to move quite quickly on this we're hoping to be in a position to be able to tender it requires some changes to legislation and processes but we're hoping to be in a position to potentially tender projects around the end of 2016 2017 at the same time what we don't want to do is we don't if there are projects in train that need to be delivered for a certain time when we know this generation coming on at the end of that we don't want to cause undue delay to these projects but in the longer term we we really think we can drive down costs to consumers by introducing more competition onshore like we have in inter connectors and like we have in offshore connections to move on we need to we need to finish the session by 12 30 because we have the minister coming in after us and I've still got members who want to ask questions firstly check really thank you convener firstly my apologies for being late this morning i had a problem with personal transmission from Ayrshire to Edinburgh I have four very brief questions and I'm sure they will be answered briefly you've just mentioned i haven't made the first questions from Ms Berger you've just mentioned that you're looking for competition yet in your submission you say off-gem regulates the monopoly companies that own and operate the transmission and distribution networks i think earlier on you talked about the the basic costs which i think are a bit fanciful because there are other costs associated with companies running the transmission network and what have you so just very briefly can you tell me how do you regulate these companies what do you actually look at so we with the transmission companies they bring forward proposals for us to say we need we need a transmission network for we need a transmission link for example in Cathness Murray so so what we do is we look at their case for is there really a need for this and we look at is do we expect transmission to come on in this area and therefore is there need for a substantial reinforcement for that so that's the first point is it needed and the second thing we do is we look at the cost of that of the investment that come forward because they are monopoly companies and it's it's not like in a competitive market where you can sort of observe the price by different companies competing against each other that's what we do is when we regulate so for example in that case we looked at we said yes there is a need this clearly a lot of generation coming forward in the north of scotland that needs to be transmitted to the demand centres further south there is a need and then we looked very very carefully at the cost for that project as we've mentioned before it is about a billion pounds it's going to cost about a billion pounds to build this project we reduced sse come to us with the proposals for the cost of that we made quite significant reductions to the cost that they put forward to us and that goes straight on to into a reduction in consumers bills so that's that's how we regulate them well you say it goes on but we've had investment in the past which hasn't resulted in reduction in consumer bills and you know i would contest that and you know if i look at monopoly companies i look at much more than just you know what is this investment other than the companies themselves and apart from the management all of the other elements of cost so if i may just then on that basis ask mr cavio who are the barclay group sorry who are the barclay group uh okay i'm not particularly familiar with them but i suspect there are financial um player who works in capital markets so you're not aware that they that you have a joint venture with them and that uh you are dealing in property in up to four 24 sites this is from your night at your report uh and companies so if you're talking about so so so national grid property is a completely different part of national grid the one I work in um but we we do property development we have a number of sites that used to particularly in england in england um have disused gas holders in and we are we and we are experts effectively redeveloping land doing the environmental cleanup and releasing it in order to fight housing i think that's all very worthy forgive me for interrupting because i know we have a shortage of time but the again in in your national in your report financial report half your report it talks about realising greater value for london for our london portfolio i mean how much time are you spending on transmission which is your core business as far as we're concerned and investing elsewhere and it comes back to the issue that you're not looking at all the costs involved in monopolies at all well just to be clear i spent 100% of my time on transmission that's my business uh the people in national grid plc who deal with that a completely different part of the business and apply the appropriate resources we you know we are a large corporate um company with many parts of business and we make sure we have the appropriate resources but you know we are uh you know we absolutely take resourcing our our activities extremely seriously i'm i'm actually recruiting massively at the moment due to some of the enhanced responsibility that cursory is talking about we need more power system engineers um and we've been investing um you know about a billion and a half per annum every year for the past probably five years on the on the on the transmission network you can understand my concern is who's paying for this or paying for a part of it certainly when we talk about getting the bills down which are not coming down and you're investing in non-core business i'm not saying it's wrong i'm just saying the any investments in non-core business that's like the transmission business we're only done on the basis they pay for themselves anything that wouldn't touch consumer bills the amount we're investing in the transmission network is in order to provide the ability to move power from where it's being generated such in scotland down to consumers in other parts of the network so uh and we're regulated by um Ofgem as she as curse okay i wonder i wrote this down immediately you said it you said coming back to to investment and generation you said we can't get generation the timescales we need to is that true or is that mistake no no i i i i said generation can come often often come in on a shorter timescale than we can necessarily build the transmission that that generation sort of um uh would ideally uh be in place we've had to put in a number of mechanisms to deal with that you know i don't buy generation i do sometimes contract with generators around specific balancing services but ultimately it's for the energy market of our generation just one one last question briefly for mr Berger mr levy and mr garner is the national grid the right body to uh act as our systems operator i could take that one yes the um the organisation that mic is responsible for as a system operator that um that has come quite different functions from the organization which is also inside national grid which is to own transmission assets so they're although they're under the same umbrella they do actually operate to two separate functions so we relate quite closely with with with mic and his team about connections to the system and how reinforcements need to be planned to meet the needs but we also relate to the other side of the business the owning side in terms of the physical connections and how we arrange our physical activities on the ground but someone's got to be the UK system operator someone's got to hold a ring so the only question would be whether there's sufficient independence between the two parts of the business which one of which is overseeing the national interest and the other effectively in competition with ourselves mr Gardner it's very much the same very much the same line is that comment um i think you need a you need a single s o to to ensure that you get the sort of optimum solutions that are developed and you know for the running of actually the system and the development of the system into the future right very briefly my answer is going to depend on what everybody else's was but but no so my answer that's not quite true my answer is yes they are but it's a good question because you do want to make sure that you've got confidence that um what they do is the s o is separate from what they do is the the to and i think that's where you were going with your question so for example with the enhanced duties that they have as a system operator following our itpr project we have set stronger ring fences about how they can share information who can take what decisions within the s o to to limit the interaction between the s o and the to okay thank you thanks um patrick harry are you still keen to come in i think the moment's pass was passed okay go on mcdonald do you want to come in about the capacity margin no right okay fine we've got three minutes left and he has to come in with a follow-up question lose my doll did yeah yeah yes on the conversation we had a little earlier about um transmission operation and the bids that companies might make to construct that because one of the other aspects that's come up in some of the evidence has been around other consequences of building the necessary transmission connections for example around economic development in remote areas around if you like creating the critical mass to enable generation to go forward and i wonder if witnesses feel that the structure and the system we have at the moment achieves those objectives as well as it could or whether there needs to be there ought to be a consideration of other aspects of policy in deciding whether infrastructure projects go forward or not start with that um so so we do need to be clear what our role is as a regulator and much as i might have personal preferences and be very interested in regional economic development unfortunately for me that is not my role as a regulator so we our duty is to protect the interest of interests of energy consumers it is not us an employment generating agency you don't want the energy regulator to be the employment generating agency you want government to take these policy decisions so so government takes decisions as to you know what what the skills policy what skills and training policies is what employment support policies is you know to some extent it's constrained by european legislation what kind of industries you should support in what places um and again what kind of energy mix you have you have through the emr policy so that that is not our role as a regulator our role is to make sure that the transmission companies deliver a network that delivers the government's objectives and energy um in the most efficient way and inviting potential competitive tender bids you will you simply go for lowest cost will that be the criterion that you will apply it is but it has to it has to meet the sort of safety and reliability standards and timeliness um it has to score against all these points it's not just you know quality matters um as well as cost for the the energy network absolutely right i think we're out of time so um thank you all very much for coming along um and helping the committee uh we will now have a short suspension to allow a change over thank you okay if we can uh reconvene uh i'd like to welcome joining us uh this afternoon Fergus Ewing minister for business energy and tourism who's joined by Colin Miller head of policy claire anderson drafting solicitor and Charles Keegan head of land register completion at the scottish government um we are here to take evidence on a piece of subordinate legislation the registers of scotland bracket voluntary registration comma amendment of fees et cetera closed bracket order 2015 in draft minister thank you convener the draft order which the committee is considering today is a significant step in the process towards the completion of the land register which is one of the key policy objectives underpinning the land registration scotland act 2012 as the committee knows the Scottish government has asked the keeper of the registers of scotland to complete the register by 2024 the main purpose of the draft order is to provide an incentive to increase the uptake of voluntary registration applications and it seeks to do so in three ways the first of all the order provides a 25 percent reduction in the fee for voluntary registrations across each of the ranges of consideration paid or value and if parliament approves the order that fee reduction that fee reduction would come into force on the 30th of june this year second the draft order provides for the closure of the register of sayings to the recording of new standard securities from the 1 April 2016 the effective of this is that a person who owns land which is recording the register of sayings would be required to apply for voluntary registration of the title to the land in the land register so that that standard security can be registered where voluntary registration is required to allow the registration of a new security in this way the draft order removes the fee for voluntary registration altogether once again that provision would come into effect on the 1 April 2016 finally the draft order removes with effect from the 1 April 2016 the keepers current discretion in section 27 3 b of the 2 12 act to refuse an application for voluntary registration registers of scotland estimate that these provisions taken together would result in an increase in the number of voluntary registration applications of the order of 5000 per annum over the period 2024 when the register is due to be completed this would equate to some five percent of the total number of unregistered titles as i've mentioned convener although the proposed 25 reduction in fee for voluntary registration would come into force on the 30th of june if the order is approved the remaining provisions relating to the closure of the register sayings to new securities and the removal of the keepers discretion to refuse applications for voluntary registration would not come into effect until 1 April 2016. Following consultation with interested parties the reason for allowing that relatively long lead-in time is to ensure that mortgage lenders and others have sufficient time to make any necessary changes to their own systems and processes registers of scotland will work closely with all interested parties to make sure that they are aware of the proposed changes and the process of implementing them is as straightforward as possible whilst the main purpose of the draft order is to provide incentives to increase the uptake of voluntary registration applications we've also taken the opportunity to make a number of relatively minor changes to land register fees first to provide a disposition for the sole purpose of evacuating a survivorship destination is to be charged at a fee for of 60 pounds for each title sheet convener affected instead of a value based fee which in some cases as you will know convener can be prohibitive second the draft order provides that the current fee of 30 pounds where an application is rejected or withdrawn will not apply where the sole reason for rejection or withdrawal is that another related application in respect of the same land or title number has been rejected or withdrawn and finally the draft order provides for the keeper to be able to charge a small fee of 16 pounds plus vat or in one case 30 pounds plus vat for copies or extracts of documents such as a copy of a search sheet from register of savings convener the main proposal set out in the draft order were included in the consultation on land register completion which took place between july and november last year and were finalised after further stakeholder workshops and feedback from business from the legal profession and from mortgage lenders. I believe that the provision set out in the draft order will be a significant step forward in the journey towards the completion of the land register which will be a major national asset for Scotland and I'd be happy to respond to any questions that members may have. Thank you minister. Do any members have any questions? Patrick Harvie. Thank you. I'm sure we'll all welcome steps towards the completion of the land register. I wonder if the minister could tell us if the increased registration rate that he's anticipated takes place, what level of income from fees will be foregone? Well, 25%. Which amounts to what in terms of the overall cost that the taxpayer will then be paying to the minister of the register? Well, I think that Mr Keegan can answer that question if you have. Thank you. The first thing to say is that the register of Scotland has its own income from its own fees, so we don't take anything from the taxpayer directly but through applications. In terms of the number of voluntary applications through this process, we would expect it to be around £5,000 a year, which we estimate based on our average fees of around £1.3 million, which we do. Obviously, that depends on the level which comes through due to market activity and how attractive this 25% discount would be to applicants. It's a reasonable point that Mr Harvie raises, convener. It would also be reasonable for me to point out that the purpose of doing this is to meet the objective of a 224 timetable, which is one that Mr Harvie supports. In one sense, if we don't do this, many of the 5,000 applications that we anticipate to get may not arrive. In other words, it may not actually lead to reduced income. It may lead to more applications that won't otherwise come if we don't do this. Therefore, if there are more applications than there would otherwise have been, then you could argue—time will tell, convener. I'm not making a search in one way or another, but you could argue that if you have 5,000 more applications that you wouldn't have had, or if you only had 1,000 or 2,000, although the fee for each has reduced, the global aggregate income may, in fact, be increased. I think that, just having had a moment's reflection to deal with Mr Harvie's question—a perfectly reasonable question—I should make that point, that it won't necessarily result in a drop of income to the keeper. It could actually result in an increase in income and certainly a policy imperative, which I assume Mr Harvie supports. I wasn't seeking to argue against this course of action simply to understand the scale of the income from fees that would be foregone compared with a situation where registration is required and fees required to be paid as well. Thank you. Any other points? Can I maybe ask you in a similar vein? If we're going to have an extra 5,000 transactions coming to registers of Scotland, I wonder, minister, if you're satisfied that registers of Scotland have the capability and staff to handle that, given that it's quite likely that some of these applications for voluntary registration will involve what might be quite complex titles, large estates that, over the years, have sold off little parts of land or historic titles, which perhaps are not plan-based. You can see quite a substantial increase in workload for registers of Scotland staff. Are you satisfied that there's the capability to deal with that increase? Yes, I am. I have the benefit of working with the keeper for several years now. I'm absolutely confident that our staff will deal with the work and deal with it extremely professionally. I should say to Clare Anderson that it's just pointed out to me that had we not made the changes that we are proposing to make in the draft order then, at present, the method of dealing with these matters would have been to require a keeper-induced registration, rather than a voluntary one. Were that to have been the case, the status quo to apply, then a keeper-induced registration attracts no fee. Therefore, it's necessary to move to the lower fee in order to obviate the situation, which would have resulted perhaps in the use of the keeper-induced method to attract more registration onto the register of titles perhaps held in trust of a state. It's a technical point, but it's one that is correct for me to put on to the record. On your point, convener, I am confident. I think I'm right in saying, although maybe my colleagues can help me here, that 5,000 is a large number, but it's a small number in comparison with the number of annual property transactions a year, which I think are in the order of 200,000 or 300,000 just from memory, if that's right. Maybe Mr Keegan or Mr Miller can just refresh my memory and your committee. Yes. Currently, it depends on market activity, but we get between 300,000 and 400,000 applications a year, so 5,000 would not be an insuperable additional number. On the first point that you made in response to my question minister about fees, if I had a title that was unregistered and I wanted to submit for voluntary registration, I'd be charged a fee, but if I do nothing and eventually the keeper comes along and induces it, I don't have to pay any fee at all. Why would I not just wait? I think that Clare Anderson is going to be right. The benefit to a voluntary registration is that the solicitor is involved in the process, and it's more likely that there will then be a grant of the keeper's warranty, which is a particularly good benefit to the title owner. In the case of a keeper's registration, it's less certain that that warranty would be granted. This is a job creation scheme for solicitors. Is all the more welcome for that? To be serious, I have advocated voluntary registration to those who have substantial land holdings and their representatives. I did so in 2011 and 2012 for that absolute reason that in that time many of the big firms in Scotland were laying off young solicitors, and therefore I have for a long time advocated that landowners in particular can play a part in helping to generate work that enables us to avoid shedding the services particularly of young solicitors just at the most difficult time. I mean, hopefully economically we've moved on since then, but I think the argument remains the same. If this is taken up and I'm confident that it will be, then it will help to secure legal work for young practitioners and give them good experience at the beginning of their career. I expect that they will end up doing quite a lot of the hard work action. That perhaps is a silly question for the legalities of this, but making a point of trying to get as many people to register as possible, what is going to be the mechanism for communicating this as widely as we possibly can? Well, I think it's already been communicated fairly widely. I mentioned earlier that what we've had, the land registration bill and of course members of this committee, were played a part in bringing that to fruition. But also the keeper has had meetings with stakeholders. I think I'm right in saying and I maybe ask Mr Keegan or Mr Miller to expand on this that there has recently been a meeting with 26 solicitors who have clients who are likely to be able to avail themselves of the provisions of this instrument, if Charles could answer that question. Yes, thank you. We've got a number within register of Scotland. We obviously have very good contacts with the solicitors and the persevering community, so we'll be sending information out electronically to them. We've also, as the minister said, we've had a number of meetings with key stakeholders and professional advisers of particular groups of landowners and explaining the benefits of voluntary registration. I have to say that working for the land register is very encouraging to hear those stakeholders think about actually being on the land register as a better thing. It's actually quite an encouraging thing. What we're doing with them is we're working out what we could do to help them in the preregistration world by providing information to them, maybe in different formats from the way that we've done before, so it's quite an encouraging landscape at the moment. If there are no other questions to the minister, I would just point out to members that the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee considered this instrument on 26 May, and there were no points that arose in relation to it. We will now move to item 3 on the agenda, and I would ask the minister to move the motion to approve the register of Scotland voluntary registration amendment of fees, etc. Order 2015. So moved. Thank you minister. Do any members wish to speak on this motion? If not, I will put the question. The question is the motion S4M-133-18 be agreed to, or we all agreed? We are agreed. Thank you. Are the members content that the convener and the clerk produced a short factual report of the committee's decision and arranged to have that published? Great. Thank you very much. We now move into private session.


Yo, what's good welcome into the front yard fantasy hour brought to you by Fandall I'm your host today JL join with my good buddies Joey, right J. Felicio We're also joined by good friend of the show Legend in this industry fantasy sports writer at CBS It's also analysts on fantasy football today, and he's got the meats. Mr. Heath Cummins. How you doing he know? I don't I was really uncomfortable with the legend in this industry And I realized the industry we're talking about was fantasy sports game shows, and I think I am So I'll take it So humble ever humble welcome any glad to have you back my friend. Hey, it's been a good day already Rock-chalk Jayhawk we can all get ready to cheer for the Golden Eagles and I was a little bit for that or hopefully Something no not another Duke first round upset. We'll see go. Oh, are you do you have him losing in your bracket? I really don't know And it was a very low Low low after you should put a lot of time into this. I used to have multiple brackets for money Yeah, and now I'm just pretty much at the point to where I start watching college basketball today. Yeah Yeah, I'm with you. I'm with you don't mind out this morning We got some people in the chat one of these people called the Furman upset this morning on the show And that's Simon Simon Grunewald said look at these four hot men. What up Simon? Welcome in We got Albert in here said hello everyone. What up Albert got Matt's Lego. I Can assume I don't know LG could mean anything really Life is good life good scamper said J. L. Joey J. Heath We have that that cat translator already turned on is that what that is? Yeah, that's what it is. Yep Beautiful chat is translating in real time That says meow and cat if you didn't know they said yo And we got we got some Furman fans in the chat DJ in here for man for in for man What up Graham? What up DJ and what up geek? Welcome in today? We got a game of whole perception Or he's here. He's on these are you do we determine you are undefeated on the show. I Think that we close to determining it as we're going to yeah, oh, I can't wait to try and we're gonna go with it We'll see if that's true or not, but we'll see if it can tentatively undefeated on the fantasy football game show He just don't look it up Yeah, just don't just don't look it up All right before we get into the rules I Have one favorite ass hit that like button if you're watching on YouTube subscribe to Fandall on YouTube or if you're watching on Facebook hit that like button and follow Fandall They have fantastic content coming out all the time. You will not regret it. We are here every single week I don't know why they keep letting us come back But you can get no idea. No idea Heath also before we get the games I want to ask which what free agent signing really stood out to you this week that you weren't expecting But I wasn't expecting that you weren't expecting Yeah, I think I think David Montgomery to the Lions How was it that that was surprising me too? I I thought they'd have somebody else for Swift to share with But I didn't think they'd choose to pay somebody else more money than it took to keep Jamal Williams. Yeah Really that like just thinking about that thought process makes me really really nervous about Deandre Swift Yeah What do you think about I know you're a DJ more truth or so you excited about to move to Chicago I'm hopeful. I think there's a lot more upside than he's ever had at any point in his career I'm the guy who was way too high on him last year and I might be that guy again this year Listen fields. There's also a lot of risk too It's probably more risk than I thought he had going into last year because of fields Doesn't make improvements as a passer and they don't really change their offense all that much Then I don't really like it at all But we've seen it just with so many of the young quarterbacks They go get a real number one wide receiver and they make the leap and that's what I'm hoping for from both fields and DJ more Yeah, I feel the same way the the David Montgomery Signing and that one just sticks in my head and I feel like I feel like the thing that That has been really living rent free in my head. He I don't know if you remember this But it feels I remember a poor coming out that was talking about Dan Campbell not being that happy with the Andre Swift and Blind that he might not want to continue using him in the same way Is that how do you see that playing out this upcoming year? Yeah, I think that he had a quote they said is we're starting over with the Andre Swift this year Which yeah, you could take it optimistically and think oh, they're gonna try him as a full-time running bag again Or you could take it as the under swift really needs to do something to roll it all because he's got nothing right now I think there are certain organizations and coaches that if you have a hard time staying on the field they lose trust in you The Giants after their free agent moves this offseason clearly not one of those teams Believe an injury prone at all Paris Campbell Darren Waller. Come on. Come on. Oh, yeah But I it seems like Dan Campbell's really kind of lost trust in the Andre Swift. Thankfully. He's the type of back especially with fresh legs That can get 11 touches and still have a good fantasy day. We've seen right a lot over the last two years, right? Yeah, he's got that Explosive upside which is why people haven't been fancy so much it makes sense. I'm one of those I love me Cindy Andre Swift, but it's not looking good It's so weird like the things that we value and like in running backs and then you see NFL coaches Prefer not Williams and David Montgomery because They know what they're going to do and they know they're going to be there to do it Yeah, that's such a good point. I feel like I find myself reminding people a lot Running backs are just not valued in the NFL. You know teams don't they don't have to pay very much to get a good running back So yeah, it's not not quite the same dynamic All right, let's get into our game of pole perception I'm gonna pass it off to Jay Jay's gonna be running our game today and Jay you got the rules I do today We will be playing something Heath has never played before pole perception It's a game where contestants try to guess the public's opinion on fantasy football polls There's two rounds and then a final round during the first round We will I will show the contestants a poll question. They have to guess what? Percentage of people chose side a so no how many no matter how many options there are you're always guessing the first one Heath let's say you guess 17% on the first poll JL and Joey will then get a chance to guess if they think it's over or under If they are right, they will get two points. The first contestant scores points based on how close they are to their estimate Up to ten points if you hit it right on the nose zero points if you are more than 15 percentage points off there's a little bit of a mixed in there, but we won't go over that and then for the second round there is a extra mechanic a Way over and a way under so we can hit that in the second round. You don't hit that now, okay? Yeah, wait in the second round. Okay. Well, let's hit it in the second round and we can go right at it Alright, and you can thank one. Mr. Simon Grunavelle for this order.  Yeah, I think he's just bad that you took his his Bay Baker. I think that's what it is down in Tampa Bay Tampa Bacon ears. Yeah, we're making it a thing. No, we're not you with me Heath. I got yeah Juggling with whether or not he's actually going to start. Oh, you think a little Kyle Trash ashen. I Will Kyle Trash? I have Really a difficult time knowing what to expect from Baker Mayfield I again one of the reasons I was higher on DJ Morse. I thought he was better than his reputation was in Cleveland And then he shows up in Carolina and for half a season is the worst quarterback in the NFL Yeah, what the heck happened? I'm counting backups. Like he was Brutal dozens of backups could have been better than he was in Carolina And then he goes to the Rams and starts a couple games and looks like Baker Mayfield again Yeah, I was so baffled. I was fully in his court. I think it's probably been McAdoo's fault Everything's been McAdoo's fault. No, let's not let's not talk about that. Let's move on. All right, Heath Are you ready to go for the your first poll? Yeah. Yeah. All right Heath who are you taking in 2023 redraft leaks a Kyle Pitts? Be Darren Waller.  Yes, all these polls are within the last four days. This was and I know this one This one specifically was after the trade to the Giants after the trade to the Giants, okay So you're guessing what percentage of the public Chose the side a in this bowl. So coppets in this bowl and there's no see results option No, I'll go with 54% 54% final answer Yep, go ahead. By the way, Heath. Thank you because every time I use one of your polls in this game I have to do the whole calculation to rule out that see result option So thank you. I have a whole I have a whole little note. That's just called the Heath note Awesome Yeah, that's gotta do math and I did not want to do any math. So we didn't have to go there JL Heath went with 54% mr. Kyle Pitts. What are your thoughts? 2023 redraft leagues Makes this a little more even so the 54% I think is a really solid line I'm gonna take the over I think it's gonna be slightly over 54% I think the big difference is just the I don't think that people are as excited I don't think people are excited about either of these two offenses But Darren Waller to the Giants feels like a bit more of a stretch than Kyle Pitts on the same team He's been on and so I think people will be more confident in pits just because it's a bit more of what they know So I'll go over. Okay Going with the over Joey. What do you think you agree? He's gonna split the ring Yeah, no, so when I play pole perception, I do this little thing where I just predict the number in my head So I was like 60 40 Kyle Pitts, so I'm gonna go slightly over as well jail had all the points I don't think people have lost the faith and Kyle Pitts will be his third season next year That's usually when tight ends break out, you know, whether a tiny key or Ritter. We'll see but I would still think how it's a woman's pole Heath you got both of them going with the over and let's take a look at the chat. We got some guesses in there Dame with 77% geek going with 65 Mr. Scampers 81 Albert 63% like to change my answer DJ with 47% and Grim fan with 25% well the question was Who are you taking in 2023 redraft leagues side a Heath he said you wanted to change your answer and Unfortunately, if you would have you would have been even worse off 50% You're within five so that means you get Five points both of these guys went on the over so they get zero so you are starting this game off. Oh Wow, that's I always like I was like to think of jail as a leader and I should just stop thinking of him that way This is your mistake I'm not sure not sure what led to that decision-making and I believe the closest was gonna be our good friend. Mr. DJ DJ and Heath what do you think you still in on Kyle pits? It's weird because the last two years I've been anti Kyle pits I guess just because of ADP and I'm not determined whether we like guys or not I would assume this will be my favorite year for Kyle pits because I If only 54 per 50% of people are taking him over Darren Waller Then he's gonna be around five round six pick and all of a sudden I'm a Kyle pits fan Yeah, I'm with you. That's you've worked that down perfectly Yeah, I'm surprised. Is he outside the top five tight ends now? Yeah Who's like for redraft? Yeah, for real. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Yeah. Oh, does he slip into that fist spot though? I'm gonna put Hawkinson in there. I'm gonna put Kelsey Andrews and There's someone on the kettle kettle kettle and then I think he slips into five there See waller I Would put I would put pits over waller. Okay, just Arthur Smith just scares me It's just and then who they they traded for John Oosmith Like I just can't wait to see the tilting on Twitter when John Oosmith gets more targets in the game Oh No, he's not gonna get more targets ever he's gonna have like 14 targets on the entire season But six of them are gonna be in the red zone CJ's ammo effect. Yep, exactly. Well, well done Heath. You got five points on that one and played that Absolutely well done and then we had a do we want to hit that question from mr. DJ We want to keep rolling. We got scammers in the chat said Tampa Bacon ears or Kyle trash can ears that We got a we got a quarterback competition on our hands boys. Yeah, I see my kids. Go ahead, Jay Thank you, then So my kids were yelling in the background so I get to chime in on the Baker Mayfield news But I went out and bought a Bucks Jersey yesterday with the Baker Mayfield news got Caleb Williams on the back I'm already I Hope it's Kyle trash just so we don't have to hear JL say Tampa Bacon ears. Oh now. I'm just a trash can ears That's fine. I don't know why oddly, but there you go. Jay and DJ said Jay How do you feel about the first-round opponent for Duke a lot of people say or Roberts could pull the upset? I'm one of those people. I got me to do I could 100% seat happening I will say I'm excited the way that the team Started to play in the second half of the season finally got healthy We've only lost one game when our entire team has been healthy With that being said or Roberts is a very good team. I could Especially it's a 5-12 matchup. So that automatically means it can be an upset. Those are the rules Have something on speed 16 and two out of the last three years. It's an or Roberts I don't know. I check sleeper.  I'm going to be an Asheville next week So be a couple games this weekend. Oh, yeah, I thought to a bar in Asheville Yeah, that will be awesome. Have you ever been to Asheville Heath? Never have it's amazing. It's a cool place. It's weird It's cool place though. It is weird. It is definitely weird, but it's beautiful. You know as I got an older I like weird. I prefer weird all the time. I don't want normal people. Yeah That's why Joey and I are on the team Exactly why you guys are here. All right Let's move on Go ahead with scamper scammers that I apologize for not voting in your Twitter polls. He must keep the poll perception integrity Appreciate that that has a very high level of integrity. Yeah, that's an ethical cat. Yes JL we're on to you your question 12 teams super flex tight end premium half PPR side a 107 or side B Trey Lance Oh 107 12 teams 50 Prem Half PPR 107 or Trey Lance Trey Lance feels like he's gonna break this game because it feels like everybody is all over the place on on him They either want rock party to be the starter on that team and then the trade Trey Lance or They want Trey Lance start and they love them 107 is super flexed tight end premium. That's pretty valuable You're past like the main quarterbacks There's a DC. It's a decent tight end draft. So I could see they're being value there.  Yes I 42 lock it in lock it in. He's all right. You are not allowed to change it any longer Joey Jail what with 42% side a 107 pick over Trey Lance. What say you? Yeah, so I recently made a trade in a similar league with these types of settings with the 101 involving Justin Fields And I feel like I had to pull teeth to get it done. I got fields gave it the 101 There's some other pieces involved, but the 107 for trailing. I think trailing is a lot further down there I think the 107 is gonna win this out. I'm gonna go a little bit over Over for Joey. Is that your final answer? Yeah, this is tough because trailing it's is so polarizing He's same question to you jail what with 42% do you think the actual answer is higher or lower than 42% the reason I said wow was because I played the Joey game in my head In my head, I had 40% Oh and so I have basically no lean at all and I'm glad I stuck with my answer then. I think I think game theory wise. I need to go over so I'm gonna go over Going with over on the 42% now is that your final answer He's already mastering the game. He's like dirty with the game theory and I jail now that uh They have their answers in where you change think about changing it going higher or going lower I was thinking about going higher. Okay. I was thinking that Maybe people are out on trailance. I mean there's enough doubt It's chance. Absolutely. Well before we get to the real answer. We've got some answers in The chats the chat rim with eight or percent. Whoa Oh Mr. Scavers with 47% okay, DJ one with a queen B and oh my god I did a terrible job and did not explain the queen B to you. Oh, yeah Oh, yeah, so queen B is if you think jail is 100% correct You hit it he hit it on the nose you can queen be it you would guess the same thing as him But it's all or nothing either you get the 10 points with him or you get nothing Geek with 38% Albert with 36% Dame with 57% I mean apart from grim. They're pretty consolidated guesses there. Yep. Now. I will say there is Somebody I won't say if it's jail or within the chat that is One percentage point off Maybe I shouldn't say somebody maybe I should say some cat Because it was what a killer scamper's 47% the correct answer is 48% Jl you are six points off You get three points heath and uh, joey. I am sorry Neither of you get any points. Well, no, I thought they both picked over Both got the over you both get two points I accidentally put 58 for heath in the first round. Wow Impressive start heath. Yeah There we go. Yep. I'm not hot There I motion to play with me and not I was uh, sorry, joey. I know he goes stand in the corner. There we go. Well done. Mr. Scampers. Well done Everybody got some points that round. So not too shabby Wasn't as good as heath's run, but well, you know Can't really see the scores No While I update the scores joey Why don't you go ahead and tell me what you think about cherry lance? Um, I don't like him bob I didn't like him last year. I know I was calling you bob because it just fit Um, you know, I wasn't too huge on cherry lance last year He is slipping kind of what keith said about kyle pits I didn't like him a lot because of where he was going in drafts He does seem to be slipping a lot further down So I don't feel there's as much risk with him, but I would still rather take I mean honestly in redraft like a jared golf who finished pretty much the top 12 quarterback last year And would have been higher some of those touching on some under st. Brown would have gone outside the five-year-old mind Yeah, tell me about that. I have a lot of almond raw and that that hurt Heath, which side do you fall on you a brock purdy guy a trade lance guy or still still unsure? I think if I was the 49ers fan, I would 100 be a brock purdy guy Um, I think that like kyle shanahan's just proven over and over. He can build a good team around a brock purdy Um as a fantasy football guy, I don't believe the brock purdy is a top 25 quarterback I just I think he was pretty fortunate to get the fantasy production he did last year And I I don't really expect him to improve that much So as a football guy I had much of the rebel ants What'd you see with your eyes? What what what did what did that tell you when watching brock purdy? Um, I think he's like I think he's kind of just a guy Okay, because I think that's the part that's that was like That's where I had some cognitive dissonance where I was like this guy shouldn't Be as good and like comfortable and like have this rhythm Given what we know about him. So why is he looks so good in the pocket? Why is he looks, you know, looks so good on the field and that was that's what started to make me look at it But I still just don't think that it just wouldn't make sense for them to switch to brock purdy Given how much they gave up that would that would signify a very significant shift in strategy on from shanahan and that that to me would be almost at him admitting that They went they made a mistake with trailants sam darnold's gonna be your number three quarter brick Yeah Bearded sam darnold's a different guy. Yeah, that that gives him a couple extra xp. So sam darn it I I recently heard a wise man say that the best ability of availability So, you know, that's my worry with trailance is just hasn't been that available By the way, I'm the wise man. Yeah Sucking up to the gas Well done joey. Well done. Well through the first two You're getting away with seven points jl and joey Both have come on joey.  You have three not to Fix that real quick. Watch that. Watch out. Watch out. I'm coming for you. There we go So an extra point for mr. Jl and then There we go They already make my kale blames joke Yes, yeah, you can again if you'd like though. Ah, that's good. Okay. All right joey, it is your turn. Let's go Who's the better nfl wide receiver? a hunter ren fro b Jacoby mires, we all know the right answer How many climson graduates voted in this Man This feels really 50 50. I'm gonna go 49 hundred ren fro 51 jacoby mires. I think 49 hundred I was like, what what are you talking about? No, actually, I'm gonna lower that down. Um I'll go 40 60. So 40 percent hunter ren fro 40 60 so you 49 then 40. So you were at 40 Yeah, I dropped it down final answer Yeah, that feels about right from what I've been seeing in the on the old twitter Alrighty 40 percent is your final guess heath. We will roll to you Side a is hunter ren fro. Yeah, this is one of those where I'm trying to do the math because this is my poll I think and there was a series there was a sea results option on it. I'm not sure I'm very Very confident that hunter ren fro was in the 30s on that poll I may have lied and said that I didn't have any sea results because this is your poll. That is correct. Okay I'm gonna go under but I'm not confident in the sea results calculation I think he's right. I think he's he's gonna get some points here jl Heath went with the under joey's guess was 40 Tried to trick you. I tried to switch switch a little bit of the order on you and uh See if I could throw you off, but that that obviously did not he's like I recognize why I work anywhere That posture she that's all mine, baby Jl joey's guess was 40 percent heath went with the under. What would you like to go with? If you had asked me this or we were playing this game Three days ago I would have answered on the hunter ren fro side, but there's a single poll that just rocked my entire world Just destroyed any sort of foundation of trust or confidence that I had in my own ability to evaluate the public sentiment on hunter ren fro because Jacobi Myers is loved on twitter. I've learned Dave kluge put out a poll and it was it it was who's a better nfo wide receiver And it was juju spiss you search kobi mires. Yeah kobi mires won by a Lot a lot and it was a very big sample size. So I'm I'm gonna take the under with heath I'm gonna just follow that wave because I have no idea So you are going with the over or the under under under. Yep. I'm tailing heath here All right, let's see what we have in the chat for some guesses. Hopefully people didn't go look up the answers while we were Sitting here dame with 35 percent. Mr. Scampers went with 33 percent albert 45 percent geek with 52 percent grim fan with 39 dj with 28 percent And mr. Scampers says his is per sources. So per sources that makes me think mr. Scampers looked it up. Yeah It's possible Or he's got someone to look it up. That is true. Scampers makes a good point though So juju is hated though. Hunter Renfrow isn't hated Yeah, that is 100 renfrow. Excuse me. I misspoke Well, joey Start it off with 49 percent went to 40 percent You think you cost yourself points and you think you gained yourself. I think I gained my self points You are wrong. You cost yourself points because it was 47 percent Hunter Yeah, and it was um followed my heart. Yep. It was 47 percent Including the um, I had to do a little bit of math and it was yeah Yeah, but I got points. Yeah, this is the Arthur meme with the clenched fist. That's how I feel right now Yep. Oh, but they didn't get any points, right? So heath and jl did not Joey you got three points So well done on that Heath is that on purpose?  Uh, no, no, I really uh, I screwed that one up. I told what I said I go but I don't think that the sea results probably made the difference. I have to go back and look at the poll now um, because I I really thought he was in the 30s. He must have made a comeback He was uh, 43 percent without the sea results. It was 43 hundred renfrow and then there was a seven points 7.7 percent of sea results. So after the math, all right bumped him up a little bit So, yeah, so I have hundred renfrow. Yeah, and let's see who got what it was 47 I believe albert was the closest with 45 percent Um, I don't see anybody else even closer. So nice job Nice albert. Well done Now jl is the resident clemson fan What are your thoughts on hundred renfrow this year for fantasy purposes? I like them. I think hundred renfrow Is probably going to be one of the most consistent wider severs that we have for fantasy. Uh, just in general, he's just He creates opportunities. He's a very good football player And I think a lot of people, uh, a lot of the situation before You know, I think the biggest factor against him has been the competition around him Now he's got to vante adams, but darin waller's gone I think I think hundred renfrow's spot in this offense is secure. And so as long as he's healthy Solid wide receiver three wide receiver two numbers. Yeah. Yeah, I think I'm like clemson's spot in the n it hundred renfrow's spot Completely secure. Well, I mean ouch I will say I do think that clemson should have been in over nc state, but that's another conversation Hard to make that argument now Yeah, that's true. That's true All right. Well through one round heath. You are leading the way with seven points Joey you jumped over jl with that last question You're at five jl. You're sitting at three, but Close game anybody's game and like I was saying earlier heath We do add a new rule going into the second round. Okay. We now have way over and way under So basically let's say jl guesses 75% You think he is way over You can guess way over that means he's more than 15 percentage points over now if It's 14 if it's excuse me if it's less than 15, but he's over you don't get any points But if he's 15 or more, is it right on the nose jl? I don't remember If they get it right on the nose, so it's got him Okay, then you get double the points. So A little double or nothing action, but um, but the over and under if it's 17 I still get the two for my over. Yes. Yep. Absolutely. It's a double or nothing mechanic So if you think the person the line is set way off you can go for four But if it's not way off if they're within 15 percentage points, you're gonna get zero points. Okay And you can still choose over under it's just two additional options now Yeah All right, heath your second question. Who would you rather have in super flex dynasty? a jordan love b butter doodles himself mr. Mack jones I can tell you give me just a second. I will pull it up. It was Yesterday can I ask for help from the comment? I Have No idea. So this was yesterday evening. So it was after He went on okay after McAfee after juju sound with the Patriots. So I'm gonna assume that People are more excited about the the mystery box. He could be anything even mack jones And I'm gonna I think it's I think that's probably I think it's more than 55.  Alrighty 65 percent it is jl heath but with 65 on the jordan love side Which way are you gonna go? Oh man, I kind of want to go way under That would be 50 right Yes Oh my god, how do people feel about jordan love? Remember, this is twitter. So nothing makes sense That doesn't help at all. Exactly All right, I'll go with I'll go with way under way under way Alrighty the first way over or way under of the game Joey, are you gonna uh follow suit or Are you headed? So I think heath scath is really good because I don't think people like mack jones. I think they like the mystery box mack boats I'm gonna queen b this I want to be the first one to get the queen b and I feel pretty confident heath's answer But also for game theory, I need to stay close to heath and I think jl's wrong so We'll both get zero if i'm wrong. All right. All right. I followed him once before and He led me into the sea of swords Did not work out well. Come on buddy. You'll be good Let's look at the chat for the guesses grim went with 44 percent Mr. Scampers went with 69 percent. Nice geek hippie 38 percent Dame 88 Nobody has a clue. So we're not the only ones. It's all over the place Albert would be right 62 percent. Good guess. Albert. Good guess 68 went with way under All right. Well Joey Yeah, I'm gonna be the first person to hit the queen b not gonna be it because that's how you're saying you're not gonna be it But heath you had a pretty good guess 70 was the actual answer Within five you get another five points Oh boy, I was taking the under so i'm not even mad like if I hadn't taken the way under I would still got zero That's when it hurts when you cost yourself a few points, but you took your shot. It is what it is So um, I probably would have gone under so I would have got a zero anyways Who this game is quickly getting away from us joey. Yeah, I guess you were right Right uh calling heath a fantasy football game show legend undefeated.  Yeah, you're just looking so it's just Sitting there refreshing refresh. Yeah And seeing the same opinions. Oh, yeah, it's the 15th opinion on alan lizard. Yeah No way you think he's gonna be good. Cool. It's at least good to add some to the mute list That's that's the one good thing about Well after that heath you added an additional five points. Yeah No points for jail and joey, but it's still anybody's still anybody's game got plenty of time Can you play that? sound It's played with so much emotion You can just really feel really feel the despair. We need to get the prices right the when you get the wrong The boom boom boom We need that one on there next time All righty jl. We are on to you. Do you have any comments that we need to uh touch and yes, uh before I move on Scampers right after this show pub trivia with one and only mr. Joey right Simon Go ahead make the big my brother tim is gonna be on You And I believe the chat cat goes the closest again with 69 so well Well done chat cat the chat cat jl. Are you ready for your next question? Oh, yeah, I'm gonna hit this one exactly right All right. Well, I hope you know kenneth walker Oh, I do walker value check super flex ptr settings side a Is said kenneth walker side b is jk dobbins and a 2024 first round pick That is all the context that we have super flex yes ppr yes And it's a first round pick next year first round picks valuable Especially next year. It's always more valuable than this Yeah, it's like It's more valuable the earlier you have it Oh, I'm gonna go. I think kenneth walker is going to win this Because I don't think dobbins. I don't think dobbins and at first this year Even maybe gets this done.  I'm gonna say I'm gonna I'm gonna follow in the footsteps of my my good friend. Heath here. I'm gonna go 65 65 that's your final answer Alrighty jelly I know you don't like to follow jl, but how do you think he did you think he uh Think you're gonna risk another queen b or where we had no no, I think you put up a good answer. Um Man, I I think kenneth walker is gonna win this slightly over. So I'm gonna go over Over final answer. Yep Alrighty, he's joey went over on jl's answer of 65 percent. How we feeling? Not great. Um I mean, it's it obviously helps to have a little cushion But I don't have any Clue how people are are valuing dobbins right now and the 2024 first is like there's a certain percentage of the population that's gonna take that In a lot of deals I I think I'm an under here even though. I think it's the probably the wrong play But I'm gonna go under Final answer. Yep. Alrighty and joey mr. Scampers Went ahead and said your joke again for you.  Good to go. We love that chat cat. All right question was Which side would you rather kenneth walker or jk dobbins in a 2024 first? Joey you correct jl did have a pretty good guess. It was actually 59 percent Kenneth walker. So you were just missed those extra two points. You got three points jl Joey you get to heath the first time this game. You did not get any points this round. So no He got it. Yeah, it's reversed. Yeah, I got a wrong heath got around. I can't do that was not a joke That was me not doing simple math again. Well, the sound still the sound still worked.  Joey just desperately wants the laugh track He does He just seeks the approval of the people people on the laugh track cool heath my friend you are uh lighten it up After I'm doing the simple math right now on your handy dandy um table that you made that adds it up for me So thank you for that. Mm-hmm. All right, so He just said charlton lost to uh sdsu 63 57 Upset alert I'm gonna pick that. Um, I don't remember because I did exactly what he did this morning and just start picking games so Nope, I picked charlson sdsu was the five and charlson was the 12, right? Yeah, I picked charlson was the 12. Yep I I was telling simon earlier today. I um, I always pick every bracket. I pick all the twelves Other than the duke game. I I couldn't do it But I uh, so I'll I'll take that man that that whole little section there Uh, I think a whole lot of people are gonna have that wrong The firman winning firman's going up against charlson in the next round. Oh, that's so awesome That's what makes the tournament so much fun. No charlson lost you said The charlson win. No charlson lost. That's why I was confused when he said upset alert. Oh, oh, that makes sense Wait, so the 12 didn't win. I'm so confused right now Are we like I'm All right, so with the one the one question left Before we get to the final round Heath has 14 points jl has six Joey has a fiver Still still with we got we got this a if we get it exactly right joey. We're back in it I've done it once before I hit two in a row do it again Don't forget you got the way over in the way under two so you get everything anything can happen All right, joey your question. Let's take that down Do the bears add a running back better than david montgomery? a is yes b is Okay, this is interesting because they did add travis homer i believe Yes There is a very uh on twitter. There's a lot of belief that the bears may draft bijon um So i'm gonna lean into that belief and I would say bijon romantz. It is better than david montgomery I think everyone else would agree with me on that um So I am going to go I do like her bird though. I'm going against myself and everything I was saying last year. I'm going to go 63 percent yes 63 percent. Yes, joey. Is that your final answer? Yes Hey joey, and I gotta say I know you said that bears fans keep saying that bijon is going to go to the chicago I feel like every single team I've seen mocked at least once with bijon everybody. I can see the cowboys. I've seen people save the eagles See the giants the bills everybody I think everybody just wants bijon because he's such a talent, but I'm with the same as the same as lamar Yeah, it's like everyone's like man. I would love to see lamar on On the falcons or I'd love to see lamar on this team. It's like, yeah, of course, of course you would I would have rather gave up the picks and gave lamar the contract and paid any dany dimes, but that's just me It's fair Heath joey went with 30 60 What would where are we at? No, man, I just cannot read today joey went with 63 not 36 63 For yes, the bears will add Running back better than mr. David Montgomery I'm sorry the cat, uh, you've heard about like cats getting distracted by things The cat in the chat Distracted you from because he said near pressure the colts Did it happen officially happened no way No way. Yes. That's actually really fun Yes How do you feel about that? Oh, I'm a super super excited for the next month of an and a half of thinking for me to be a starting quarterback What are the chances I'm gonna rank him so high I Oh man, that's so fun if they if they actually stick with that If minch you is the starter for the colts going into the season I'm gonna be full colts fan all season 100. Yeah, I'm all in Yes, they have the fourth fourth pick. He's coming to the press conference like a full on cowboys Yes Cowboy outfit like the hat the boots everything Assless chaps. I mean everything. Well, we might ride a horse into the It might happen guys I love it.  Yes We see if it's the little Logo, you know, we will Oh god, let's let's go tweet at him right now and make sure it happens. Yes. Um, so happy. I want this too bad I don't even remember what's happening right now. So 63% was the guess I think this question combines a couple of like twitter isms They there's a segment that really thinks David Montgomery is actually bad And it's even worse that he breaks all those tackles because he's never running fast because he's breaking tackles um, which I mean, it might be because there's four 300 pound men in the backfield. You're trying to tell me to touch the ball But there's a bigger segment. I think that really has these backup running back vibes and and really thinks Khalil Herbert's A top 12 running back in the current situation and they want that to be true So badly, uh, they want it so bad and so they would vote no I would So I am going to go with the queen b Oh queen b If he hits this, I'm gonna this will screen Mention with the starting job and the queen b all in like a five minute span That's too much. That's too much. Yeah, if it happens, I'm getting out of the industry if this happens Do the bears had running back better than David Montgomery 63% Heath went for the queen b Am I a coward? That's the question Queen b All right, we're all getting zero Oh, wait, no, I can still get points. No, actually, I I don't want to ruin If this is queen b. I don't want to ruin. He's glory. Oh, it wouldn't bother me at all I just did it so he couldn't score a bunch of points Oh, so we're all just we're all just double He's just walking right into his trap Don't con joey Yeah, he doesn't care. All right, let's ride queen b. Let's go. He's all right All three of us on that horse are all four of us with mint you Uh, I love it and mr. Scamper said a horse and jorts. Yes, absolutely The jorges can you do chaps in jorts like jorges chaps? That's what I'm wearing right now. So yeah Oh, good. Okay. I could do And simon said he's going to attach horses to his camper bus. Who needs an engine? That's a crazy. He's only living outside that plane of fitness I hope so. Have you seen this story? That gardener mentioned you live he has an old bus like prison bus or school bus that he lives out of Yeah, I think it's 100 true. Oh 100. Yeah, I think it sounds like a lot of fun Yeah, he parked it in like the the eagles facility this year, right and was working out at the facility That's god. I love him I hope the final poll perception question is how many beers do gardener mentioned his dad crush on the sunday together? Free games like I don't it's the number. I don't know what it's like. Well, uh, grim went with the queen b as well Oh my god See albert went with 45% Mr. Scampers went with 73% and dame said she has never wanted anything more than a queen right now Well, joey, you said nobody's gonna score any points and you were correct Any points it was 36% That's what I said 36 Nice, remember nice. You you almost got me there for a second there Now feels like we all climbed on each other's shoulders and immediately fail. Yeah I don't we're gonna do this. We're gonna get it. We're gonna do this Yeah, I I feel pretty good about the result of this All right, we're going into the final round the score is heat with 14 joey with six joey with five We still want if still a chance, you know, if one of you guys get it right on you can still come back and beat he's well In typical simon fashion, I did not tell he's to bring a pen or paper Do you have anything you can write with or your phone you can put a percentage? I have an or I have a yellow or This is pink a pink highlighter and I have uh, uh I've got something to write on here. There you go. Simon. I hope I'm doing you proud by forgetting my tax forms I probably shouldn't use that if I have to show it I thought you were gonna say I have an orange.  That's okay, right? No, here we go this this new freeform app on the The iphone dude, that's exactly what I pulled up with the very like first time to use in this context, joey That's that's yeah, so don't try to turn it to like do like landscape because it just like it makes it all wonky Just hold it up straight. Okay Everybody ready? Yep for the final poll Who wins the afce next season? a is the jets b is the bills c is the dolphins and d is the patriots And this was I will tell you when the poll was posted it was yesterday at 130 so it was after The erin rogers news dropped are the close like the closeness results The same like the points for this round or is there a different scoring? No, there is different scoring guys. Give me just a second. I've got it right here I'm let's jail you want to go over. Yeah, exactly. So the closest the person with the closest guest is going to get five points If any contestant gets exactly right, you're going to get 10 points And if either or two contests two or more contestants have the same guests You'll share or share in the reward or lack of reward. Okay So the only way you can lose heath is if one of these two fine gentlemen Are able to hit it right on the nose and it has happened before If I get it with fine So if you're closest you win, yeah, yeah, yeah, if neither showy or I hit it exactly right, you win Right. Yeah, basically that's exactly right.  Yeah. Yeah. All right before we do Alice in the chest that came for the heath stayed for the game And that should be a slogan. Yeah I should be sure you should get cbs to make some shirts like that Stay for the heat. Uh, stay for the game. We're gonna add the add to the the in there that jail added Just it there we go. All right All right gentlemen, let's see your answers Oh my god, joey. He's 12% joey with 30 Thank you for writing it out too. I wasn't sure what that number was. I know I've struggled a little bit today So I also drew a smiley face because I'm happy Oh It's because you're hanging out with your friends No That's fair enough fair enough. All right and in the chat before I reveal the answer All right. Hold on. Simon said yet Yeah, jl. Don't don't don't turn it. Just hold it up straight. We went over this in vegas You're right. I'm sorry. I always forget What happens that happens to the best of especially when you get older Grim fan with 65 jetts Are you all right dames a four-way tie so um dame is guessing Thank you for coughing right in the mic joey. I appreciate it Four-way tie for dame 25 percent mr. Scampers went with 37 dj with 75 And Simon said that was beautiful joey because you get to hang out with simon in 10 minutes is why you're happy All right. Well The only way that any of you fun gentlemen will win And take over heath is by hitting it directly on 9 30 29 or 30 The answer is 36 36 Heath you have won Dang it once again Heath wins coming on this show Winning game Well done. I'm pretty embarrassed about my final round performance Um, and also shocked that 36 percent of people Was this poll posted in like a targeted audience? People from new york voted The science behind it is I think a lot of people did not vote for the patriots, which left 33 33 33 Yeah, can we hear the breakdown jack? But so they in that case people are saying that the jets are kind of the favorite I would imagine the dolphins are probably with the erin rogers news I would imagine the dolphins behind the jets, which I don't know if I agree with dolphins have really been building something Yeah, what's the breakdown does have like 45? I screwed up Oh, wow What did you fix the math taking the patriots out? No, I um, I uh, just Copy and paste it and 36 was the last one and also Not the final but heath you still win. It was actually 10% jets 10 what? 74 for the bills 14 for the dolphins and 2 percent for yo, we got some overconfidence on the bills guys come on 74 percent. Yeah, that's That's wild, but I think you have to think of this way. No one's saying there's a 74 answer Or 74 chance it's using the bills. None of us would pick the jets to win the afc's No, they they'd be zero percent in this I would I would consider it. Oh, okay. I think they're I think they're Sniffing at the heels of the bills. I think I think the jets are going to be coming back strong the next couple years But you're right. You're right. I still would put the bills at the top. So yeah, I pick dolphins over jets at this point I would do yeah Although I think it's a lot closer Um, so yeah, even though I messed up the final answer just a little bit heath you are still The winner well done I thought it was going to change the result by how you you said that. No, thank you That would have been fantastic. So I had 19 points Five five on top of the I don't know what would you ended with? Yeah, yes. Yep 14. Yep 14 and five So it's not really wanted to be j. Heath Steve Harvey Yeah Need that that sweet little mustache. Yeah, that's fantastic. Well as always It was a like my pleasure Come on this show. So are you guys going to come up with another new game for me to try? Yeah, we got plenty. We got to come up with something.  Scampers Me too. One even we all do Heath won even harder Just it's it's really it's a you guys do a phenomenal job Of putting together a really really fun show And it's my favorite show to be a guest on so thank you that means the world Yeah, thank you so much for making time for us once again If you aren't already make sure you are following heath He puts out the best polls and they all have see results on them every single one of them Add a heath coming senior right there under his handsome face he I'm gonna design a game just for you Yes, next time you're on it's gonna be the heath game. Just you wait The heath game. I heath game. You need to do some research find out things. I'm really bad at Uh-huh. Uh-huh so that I can win So I can stack cards against me.  I'm excited 12 that's 12 years from now when gardener mentioned she was retiring. I'm gonna remember So we all have to get gardener minch you matching tattoos now, right with like the horseshoe It's just the mustache. Yes, the mustache. I think a sure Z is acceptable T-shirts that look like a jersey. Yes. Um, I think I'll recover it That works We'll let simon get the tattoo because you know he'll do it It's like a try jersey jaguars eagles golds His dad wears it every game. It's like one sleeve is a different color than the the middle is All right, that's gonna do it for this show coming up right after this We got the pub trivia fancy football pub trivia with joey tim and simon Where you get to play trivia you are the contestants so hop in there play along with us As I said, make sure you're following heath on twitter fantastic follow and check out their show over at cbs It is fantastic and you can probably find joey commenting in and around there just living there so And if you haven't already hit that like button subscribe to fandal on youtube follow them on facebook and twitch until 10 minutes from now We'll see you then. Bye. Bye Go do oh, I forgot the outro


Every teacher lines their students up multiple times a day. It's very important to line your students up quickly and quietly. So there's less time in the transition mode of the day and more time in the teaching mode of the day. Lining up is easy to do. Lining up is easy to do. When you take care of only you. When you take care of only you. Beat together, hands by your side, when we get together, we can make a line. Each week I have a word of the day and they know that when I say the word of the day in clap my students know that that word of the day means go. When I say the word of the day please get ready to line up. Stagger. Sometimes short and sweet is the very best method. Hands to your heart. Ready let's start. Ready let's start. Feet on the floor. Hands behind your back and you say no more. I don't just use these methods for lining up my students in my classroom. I also use them outside of my classroom when we're going to lunch or when we're waiting in line to use the restroom. There's so many times the day when we are in transition mode that when students start hearing me say one of the lining up procedures then they know that it's time to get their hands to their side, lock their lips, and get ready to transition. Try one of these in your classroom this week.


U.S. president may send Ukraine ATA CMS missiles. Officials from the U.S. and Europe say the Biden administration is debating whether to arm Ukraine with long-range ATA CMS missiles. The New York Times reports the army tactical missile systems known as ATAC-Ms are surface-to-surface guided cruise missiles with a range of over 300 kilometers. President Zelensky has petitioned the Biden administration for the weapons in the past, describing the missiles as vital to defeat Russian terror. The U.S. has refused to provide ATA CMS, arguing that missiles that can reach Russia or occupied Crimea would represent a dangerous escalation in the ongoing war. However, at the NATO summit in Vilnius, France pledged to supply Ukraine with long-range scalp missiles which can travel 250 kilometers. Now the U.S. is also considering following suit, officials told the New York Times. Sending ATA CMS, which have an even longer range than scalp missiles, could tip the scales for Ukrainian forces as they wage a grueling counter-offensive in Russian-controlled territory. The U.S. defense officials warn that their ATA CMS arsenal is relatively low and that sending the weapons to Ukraine could jeopardize U.S. security interests in other areas of the world. The Biden administration has reversed its stance on weapons donations to Ukraine before. Last week, the U.S. agreed to supply Ukraine with cluster munitions after previously refusing. As production of ammunition for Ukrainian defense stalls, ATA CMS and other long-range weapons systems represent a way for Ukrainian forces to advance in regions where occupying Russian forces hold strong defensive positions.