So today, I'm such a geek, but I love the subject we're talking about. The digital classroom and how it's reinventing the way we're learning. Anant Argawal is a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at MIT. A real dummy. And the CEO of the innovative online learning destination, edX. Anant, welcome. Thank you so much for being here. Oh, my pleasure, thank you. Nice to see you. So I know that you partnered with Harvard and MIT to create edX, and it offers interactive online classes from top schools. Can you explain how it works exactly? edX.org is a online destination. So learners can go to that destination, and they can take these great free courses from some of the best universities in the world, like MIT, Harvard, Berkeley, Georgetown, or Tsinghua from China, for that matter. Our university partners create these online courses and offer them on the edX platform, and people can come and take these for free from some of the best universities in the world. Which is fantastic, the key two words being for free. And college has gotten so prohibitively expensive for many people, and all these students are saddled with student loan debt. This is a very appealing way to either focus solely for your education, or, as the Khan Academy does, augment the education you may be receiving in a more traditional way. Absolutely, I think for the first time we are consistently applying technology to education. And we have to apply technology to everything else, to sports, to communications, to healthcare. For the first time, we are applying it to something that's so important, in education of absolute fundamental human right. We're now applying it to education. And when people have applied technology to any field, whether it's communications or healthcare, many good things happen. First of all, it becomes widely accessible. Second, there are opportunities to make it much, much higher quality, whether on campus or worldwide. And finally, I think there are opportunities to make the whole system and the quality such that it's more efficient, so that more students graduate. And maybe we can also reduce cost, but I think these are experiments that we are performing to see where we can take this. Plus, as the world gets flatter and flatter, global cultural literacy is becoming increasingly important. So, as you said, from every country in the world. So, these people are from all over. I mean, I would imagine they really range in age and in socioeconomic background. I mean, what kinds of people are taking these courses? Because I'd like to take one, actually. Oh, you should. It is absolutely mind-boggling. We have learners who are eight years old to 92 years old taking our courses. I'll give you a couple of quick examples. My favorite is Kushbakt. Kushbakt is a student in Peshawar in Pakistan. So, she was married early. And so, because of that, she could not complete her schooling. She just finished ninth grade. And now, in Peshawar, she writes to us saying that she's taking edX courses. She took Michael Sandel's HarvardX justice course. And she says her husband is very supportive.  And she's taking online courses. And with a very supportive husband in Pakistan, you know, here's a woman who can now get educated when they could not continue their education at home. That's fantastic. Well, you think about, and you think about the kind of social change that can be ushered in just with an education and some of the positive things that can be done in many of these countries as a result of these educational opportunities. Meanwhile, I know that there has been a lot of discussion about online education, not all of it positive. It has a bad retention rate. A lot of people sign up and they don't complete the course. And now, there's more and more discussion about having the lecture show up online, but the actual class discussion take place with real face-to-face connection. So, I guess, online courses are not necessarily a panacea or a replacement for more traditional learning. Oh, of course, we've always believed that online learning is useful not just for students who want to learn online when they did not have access to an education in many parts of the world. At the same time, we can bring the technologies, bring the learning back to campus and improve campus education at the same time. And we bring all the social into the classroom.  I said, no, bring it in. It should be part of the teaching experience. So on our platform, we have a discussion forum where, as they watch videos, students are discussing the content of the class with peers. So you can see a discussion with a student from Colombia, a learner from Pakistan, the US, India. Can you imagine the world 10 years from now when these kids who have been discussing things with people from Syria, or Pakistan, or Sudan, or the USA? And 10 years from now, they've learned together about the world's going to be a different place. It's really extraordinary. Meanwhile, you can get a certificate, not a degree, from an online course. But I understand these certificates, in some cases, are treated pretty seriously by potential employers. Absolutely. Many of them are using them on the LinkedIn profile. They're showing them to employers. We have examples from a student in India working with a partner aspiring minds in India that got a job based on a software-as-a-service course from Berkeley that they took on edX. So there's many examples of this now. Wow. And I know that Sal was one of your students at MIT. But when it came time for you to really kind of start pursuing online education in a more serious way, you reached out to Sal, and he became the teacher. So yeah, I love the way Sal Khan does videos. And so I've given them a name. I call them KSVs or Khan-style videos. And so I did my circuits course. In some sense, I was a professor, but he learned me good. And so I did my videos in the KSV style. And I liked them so much that on edX, we were creating a course called edX 101, which is a course for teachers on how to create online courses. The first thing I did was reached out to our friend Sal and said, hey, Sal, can you create for me a Khan-style video on how to create a Khan-style video? And he did. What will he think of next? Well, I think it's very exciting what both of you are doing and really game-changing, I think, all over the world in terms of education and so many things that result from a good education. So Anant, thank you so much. And Sal, again, thanks to you. And to find out more about edX and the Khan Academy, you can go to our website at katiecurrick.com. We'll be right back.


although most of his time was spent prior to this in the intelligence agencies as well as in the US military. Let me just say that I think Sid's academic work is also worth praising. I mean people always talk about policy but his academic work is quite good. I'm actually reading a forthcoming book about Kim Il Sung where his book on Kim Il Sung has been cited quite often. I noticed it was cited by this author much more than my book was cited but I'm not counting citations or anything. And then finally I would like to say that this is this is one of our Korea Platform series in the Korea Chair and we are grateful to Samsung Electronics America for their support of the Korea Platform at the Korea Chair. So Sid I will give the floor to you. You may use the podium to make some remarks. Thank you again for joining us. Well thank you Victor for that kind introduction. You know it's an honor to be speaking here today on this particular issue of unification. I know it's an issue that for our Republic of Korea friends here you've grown up your whole lives thinking about virtually and for those who are not Korean who come here via Korean studies, US government work, academic work, journalism from the very you know time you encounter the Korea issue unification of the Korea Peninsula is something we've all given thought through. Personally having followed this and studied it for a few decades myself I'm really glad to see that the discussion is moving beyond the abstract and the theoretical various formulae for unification that when you look back on them had very little to do with the geopolitical or security realities at the time. Instead we're in the realm of the concrete the real. Moving to concrete conceptualization and planning for reality we all know is coming. It's also encouraging to see the shift in the discussion of the economic dimensions of unification which I know you just covered. The idea that unification need not be feared simply because of some unverifiable and alarmist forecast of potential cost is certainly not a new one but in this regard the bold vision and leadership of President Park in declaring that unification is a bonanza or windfall or a tabock to keep it easy in the Korean and that it might bring a bonanza to Korea in the region is certainly an overdue a long overdue and encouraging proclamation and a reframing of the unification discussion. Finally one other encouraging development related to this issue is that there are few people out there today that question the commitment of the United States to unified Korean Peninsula. There may have been a time when many Koreans thought that the US may have thought saw some advantage in a divided Korea Peninsula but that's certainly not the case any longer. Our Korean friends realize that unification is indeed a central tenet of our overall Korea policy and that's what I'd like to speak to today by providing a holistic if brief overview of our broader Korea Peninsula and regional policy goals. I think we can see how the interaction of our various lines of effort on our current approach to the North Korea issue all come together and how all this by extension therefore ties to the issue of reunification. So let me start with a broad but brief regional context. In his August 13th East-West Center speech on the United States vision for Asia-Pacific agreement and Hawaii, Secretary Kerry described how America's security and prosperity are closely and increasingly linked to the Asia-Pacific. In Asia marked by democratic governance, free markets, a rules-based security order and respect for human rights is in everybody's interest. First and foremost for those who make the Asia-Pacific their home and certainly to the United States which has been and always will be a Pacific nation. It's natural therefore that the United States seeks a stable and economically vibrant Asia and is actively involved throughout the region toward that end and of course it should come as no surprise then that these broader goals are the very foundation for our Korea policy as well. You know as we watch these goals materialized in the Republic of Korea a vibrant free market democracy we never lost sight we never lost sight of the fact that our ultimate goal is of a unified Korea. We're all 70 million or so Koreans can enjoy democracy free markets, a respect for human rights and dignity. Our efforts in this regard were never designed to stop at the 38th parallel and nor are they today. In the broadest sense we see a unified Korea with these goals democracy, free market economy, prosperity respect for human rights and dignity as the natural end state toward which the Korean people, we and in fact history itself are heading. That's why the president comments alongside President Park in April of this year stated that the United States, and this is a quote, the United States supports the Korean people's desire for unification and I, the President, share President Park's vision of a unified Korea that's free from the fear of war, free from nuclear weapons and where people throughout the peninsula enjoy the political and economic freedoms that exist here speaking from Seoul in the South and as President Park's own Dresden speech made clear there are planned strategies and actions that we must devise and implement today that lay the foundation for and create the conditions conducive to a peaceful path toward those ends. Actions we take today that lead toward a democratic Korean Peninsula where everybody can enjoy political freedom and have a voice in their future. Actions we can take today that lead to a Korean Peninsula with a vibrant economy where the prosperity enjoyed by people throughout the peninsula contributes to regional and global economic growth and prosperity. Actions we can take today that contribute to a peaceful Korea unification free from weapons of mass destruction, a peaceful Korea Peninsula free from weapons of mass destruction benefiting regional and global security as well and then finally actions we can take today that can lead toward a Korea free of Gulags free of repression and free of the other cruelties that the UN Commission of Inquiry so well documented. Is this ambitious? Yes. Is it too much to handle particularly given the importance of denuclearization and stability? I don't think so. Secretary Kerry in his speech in Hawaii noted that our efforts to denuclearize North Korea and deter and defend against the nuclear missile threat are important and he also emphasized our commitment to speak out against the horrific human rights situation in the north. In doing so the secretary made clear that denuclearization and improved human rights are not mutually exclusive contradictory policy objectives. As the leadership of North Korea begins to make the right strategic choices that can bring the peace and prosperity its people deserve we will see progress on denuclearization we will see progress on human rights we will see economic growth and a better standard of living for the North Korea people. The same type of peace and prosperity that we see marks the rest of the region. Again too difficult impossible contrary to the facts on the ground contrary to the lessons of the last seventy years almost. No I don't think so at all. I mean look at the example of Burma. The example of Burma stands proof of what can happen a transformation that unfolded thanks to a broad strategic decision by its leadership that then translated into a transformation of Burma's relations with the outside world a transformation that unfolded with the international community with the United States in the lead with the international community ready to encourage and enable the changes on the ground that we've seen there. Transformation driven by a pragmatic and clear-eyed recognition that democratic and free market societies flourish while authoritarian repressive regimes wither a transformation that does remain a work in progress a work in process but that shows the potential for a nation when its leadership makes the right decisions to move down a fundamentally different path that may have seen beforehand unimaginable impossible too hard too difficult and as United States is demonstrated by the speed and agility with which it responded diplomatically to these developments in Burma the same option is available to the leadership of the DPRK but until that day comes how do we today move to that future we've identified as our goal how do we translate this aspirational into practical policy objectives and goals this is a good segue into a brief discussion of our current North Korea policy North Korea the United States remains committed to a peaceful denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula through authentic incredible negotiations let me emphasize again we want to resolve denuclearization via negotiations we're not ideologically opposed to dialogue with North Korea nor have we placed insurmountable obstacles to negotiations in our insisting that North Korea simply demonstrate a willingness to live up to its international obligations and abide by international norms of behavior the bar has not been set too high by insisting that denuclearization talks be about denuclearization and that they would progress along the lines of the September nineteen two thousand five joint statement of the six-party talks now of course talks are not an end unto themselves they are a means to an end talks must lead to a stated purpose in this case denuclearization in order to be authentic talks must demonstrate a possibility for concrete actions for concrete progress to be credible even as we pursue a path to authentic incredible talks leading to complete verifiable never irreversible denuclearization the Korean Peninsula our broader policy goes beyond talks goes beyond just dialogue and integrates three major lines of effort diplomacy pressure and deterrence which i would like to speak to today because together these three lines of effort diplomacy pressure and deterrence seek to roll back the north korean nuclear program while countering deterring and defending against the threat let me start with the latter uh... deterrence uh... i see some representatives of the republic of korea military here active duty and retired who have spent their careers working in the defense of republic of korea it's good to see you here general chung general shim and they will tell you our alliance remain strong our u.s and our okay forces go together on a daily basis in our counter provocation planning insured that pyeongyang clearly knows that as it contemplates its next set of provocations or its next actions it faces a rock solid u.s our okay alliance in response to the north's pursuit of uh... nuclear missile capabilities are counter missile planning our tailored extended deterrence stand as concrete examples of our shared commitment to deny north korean ability to threaten and intimidate the republic of korea through its pursuit of these capabilities and in the face of outlandish rhetorical threats and posturing our firm yet calm responses coupled with our seamless and transparent u.s our okay cooperation remain the foundation of our success in denying north korea the benefits of its provocative behavior and attempts at coercive diplomacy deterrence is working security is insured on pressure is important to know our sanctions are not designed to hurt the north korean people they are designed instead for a number of purposes that contribute to peace and stability on the peninsula uh... our sanctions are key element of our efforts to constrain the growth of the north's wmd program to curtail its proliferation activities worldwide and by impeding the exports and repatriation of profits from illicit sales abroad we're able to deny north korea the resources it needs to sustain and advance its nuclear missile programs by inflicting an economic indifference diplomatic cost for behavior that clearly runs counter to international norms and dpr k's own international obligations we also sharpen the dpr k's choices and lead the leadership in pyongyang to make better choices that will benefit its country and its people we also make clear that pyongyang's aspirations for improving its economy and uh... improving the livelihood of its people are fundamentally inconsistent with this pursuit of nuclear weapons thereby moving forward we will continue to seek robust implementation of u and security council resolutions and u s sanctions on north korea if the dpr k makes the right choice returns to the negotiating table and embarks on a credible path of a reversible denuclearization and begins to come into compliance with this international obligations and commitments the appropriateness of these sanctions would of course be reviewed but with our ultimate goal being denuclearization of the korean peninsula through peaceful means we continue to believe that a dual track approach dialogue is possible pressure is necessary is the best path to authentic incredible negotiations which brings us to the role of diplomacy and the question that i'm sure many of you have how do we get dpr k how do we get north korea back on the denuclearization path first let me say that we believe the six-party talks framework has provided and continues to provide a useful platform for diplomacy it has over the past several years helped us bring uh... a consensus to the need for north korea to return to a credible path of denuclearization and will continue to use this framework moving forward we build a strong international consensus on the need for north korea to denuclearize we strengthen cooperation with the other four parties uh... within that framework and most importantly we've maintained five-party commitment and consensus on the september nineteen two thousand five joint statement as the bedrock framework for a path toward denuclearization that in return would bring a range of diplomatic economic and security benefits to the dpr k with the september nineteen statement there is remarkable clarity to the expectations of the dpr k in terms of denuclearization and the potential benefits to pyeongyang should it choose this path and of course the united states for the past five years has demonstrated a willingness to engage north korea we did so with ambassador bosworth's trip to pyeongyang in december two thousand and nine after the events earlier that year of a table don't launch in a nuclear test with a process that began in two thousand and eleven after the chananam in the young pyeongchiling uh... with the process that led to the february twenty-ninth twenty-twelve understanding which uh... was shortly thereafter walked away from by the north and of course with our contacts through the new york channel our policy is not one of not talking for the sake of not talking if you can handle the triple negative we have been it will continue to be willing to engage pyeongyang engaged pyeongyang to probe its intentions to push and urge it to make the right decision by presenting to the leadership an alternative path and approve to prove our sincere commitment to improve u s dpr k relations once north korea begins to move down the path of denuclearization but clearly the ball is in pyeongyang's court so of course one can see all the three-pillar approach deterrence pressure diplomacy uh... also contributes to creating the types of conditions favorable to the future we all envision that we're all talking about here today a unified crea peninsula that's free of war free of nuclear weapons and just plain free we engage in diplomacy to seek a breakthrough on denuclearization and to ensure that the international community speaks with one voice in that pyeongyang here's one voice telling pyeongyang that the peace security and prosperity it seeks remain possible only once the leadership makes a decision to move down the path of denuclearization we can use pressure is needed to constrain those aspects of north korea behavior that are destabilizing and detrimental to our goal of laying the groundwork for peace prosperity and security that enables unification down the road and then finally until we get to that day we will seek to ensure a safe korean peninsula through deterrence looking for the day when the threat posed on the peninsula no longer exist we will speak out on the human rights issue as we look toward the day when koreans throughout the peninsula enjoy the same political and economic freedoms now enjoyed in the republic of korea to the day when human rights are guaranteed to the day when political prison camps are emptied and we stand ready as president pock also has made quite clear we stand ready to engage with the denuclearizing north korea to help its leadership move the country down a different path in which ultimately a transformed dprk can begin to join in and enjoy the dynamic prosperity that marks the rest of the region the conversations you're having here today uh... look forward to a process we all hope a unification process we all hope will unfold in the not-too-distant future the mere fact that we are here today reflects our shared understanding and by our i mean including that of u.s. official policy our shared understanding that planning for this day as you you're doing here today is a task that we can not put off we simply cannot afford to wait well thank you said for uh... very helpful statement of where policy is and what u.s. aspirations are uh... for the peninsula uh... uh... doctor south has time for a couple of questions before he has to go back to work in his new office uh... so uh... uh... we'll open the floor to a couple of questions and then please identify yourself be brief ask a question hello uh... my name is mitch mitchie niosky and i'm a student at the alley at school you know we we talk that the leadership uh... in pyeongyang is a rational and that it does things that are counter to its interests but uh... what i think we could all agree on is that pyeongyang works to protect itself in the nineteen nineties uh... the country of ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons for security agreement with uh... russia in the united states uh... to protect it in the event of an attack uh... since then one of them has attacked ukraine and the other one has failed to protect it uh... given that do you think that north korea uh... in protecting its own interest has any intention or can see any credibility in an agreement from the u.s. or by that extent to six-party talks thank you very much well it's an excellent question but uh... i think it's one really that you would have to uh... ask the leadership of pyeongyang but let me say that you know the the framework of the six-party talks uh... approach to denuclearization and why uh... we have sought for the past several years uh... going back to previous administration did to pursue a multilateral approach is because the type of environment in which north korea could move forward uh... confident of of its uh... its sovereignty is respected its interests are are reflected that uh... nobody teams up or bullies it uh... is found in the six-party talks process you have the major surrounding powers uh... uh... all the relevant parties there at the table it provides uh... aside from the question of of security guarantees and what might be generated through the process the very process itself provides an end up an environment that i believe in we believe is conducive to north korea moving down the path of denuclearization without having fears for its security along the lines of uh... you know the example you provided uh... dr green uh... so thank you for coming in congratulations on a new job and you're the right man for the job and uh... and i don't know what you did wrong to get it it's gonna be hard but i think all of us who follow this issue have great confidence uh... in the fact you're there in the presentation you gave uh... it was a good speech i agree with all of it the only thing i would say is victor charo michael green could have given that speech in two thousand six in the bush administration and since then things have happened uh... nuclear tests in the north korean uh... changed the constitution and declaration that they are a nuclear weapons state uh... so how is the administration explaining that piece of it we want to get back on the path of denuclearization six-party talks to the right framework but what do we do about cheating and perforation that has occurred since the six-party talks for last uh... meeting uh... michael that's an excellent question i this is why i i put the synthesis on the three pillars because the they they do they're mutually complimentary uh... they taken to concerns of realities of the difficulties we're facing uh... in terms of getting authentic incredible negotiations restarted at this time uh... take advantage of of the the international uh... consensus in terms of an unacceptability of a nuclear in north korea and that and the threat posed by proliferation to build the type of uh... international cooperation necessary to strengthen a prolific uh... counter-proliferation regime to to limit it's not perfect it's not a you know uh... a loophole free system out there but to limit north korea's ability to benefit from its illicit activities abroad this proliferation activities reduce its benefits and also in terms of of taking the actions necessary in terms of our military posture our military training our missile defense capabilities so that we counter the threat to whatever degree it's developed so it's it's prophylactic in terms of of uh... trying to counter the threat that's emerged and so we will continue to try to seek a negotiated uh... settlement to this issue we will continue to apply the pressure necessary so that the leadership in pyongyang realizes that it's true security and prosperity will only come when it walks away from that when it you know holds on to uh... these capabilities and in the meantime uh... take the actions necessary for the defense of the united states defense of the republic of korea the defense of japan and defense of others uh... many many uh... who are threatened by these uh... capabilities as they develop uh... i'm gonna i'm gonna have to close the floor i'm sorry but let me just ask you one question before i do is the prerogative of the chair so as you know said that you know the news story today about north korea about these three americans that are detained there uh... can you tell us what the u.s. administration is doing to get these folks out uh... when the prospects of that are very likely at this moment what you know goes about saying but it's it's worth repeating that you know the top priority the united states government is a safety safety of our citizens abroad and it's uh... we have three cases there that have been ongoing for some time we have uh... worked to secure the release of of all three through uh... new york channel through the swedes and uh... you know i think you would appreciate uh... uh... and i think everybody here would appreciate that the sensitive details of our negotiations uh... in our efforts uh... aren't really going to be played out through this room but uh... you know the uh... these three cases have have uh... posed a significant obstacle to an improvement of u.s. dpr k relations and we hope that uh... north korea would act uh... in a in a humane and uh... right way in helping us resolve these in the near future well uh... i think on behalf of everyone here we want to thank you for joining us today allowing us to be part of your coming out party and uh... we know you have to get back to work so thanks very much really appreciate it


It is now time for oral questions and I recognize the leader of His Majesty's loyal opposition. Good morning, Speaker. Speaker, more than 2 million people in Ontario don't have a family doctor. The College of Family Physicians is projecting that by 2026 a quarter of Ontarians will be without a family doctor. Doctors across the province have been raising the alarm about the physician shortage, but we have heard nothing from this government about help on the horizon. There is no plan to incentivize family doctors to stay in their practices or any sign of administrative support to ease their burden. Health Force data is showing us that in Toronto we are missing 305 family doctors. Ottawa needs 171. Barry and Muskoka, 118, and Hamilton is short 114 doctor speakers. So my question is to the Premier, how can you ensure continuous care is going to be available for Ontarians when thousands of people are losing their doctors every year? And to reply, the Premier. Well, Mr. Speaker, what if I told you there's a place that over 10,000 doctors have registered in the last five years? What if I told you an investment of $110 million to connect 300,000 more patients to primary care teams to at least 78 new expanded teams that will connect 98% of a population to a primary care doc? What if I told you, Mr. Speaker, if $50 billion and 50 new locations either are getting new hospital or expanded hospital? Mr. Speaker, what if I told you there's 80,000 registered nurses here in Ontario that didn't exist five and a half years ago? Mr. Speaker, this place is called Ontario, and we're going to continue building Ontario's healthcare team. Order. Restart the clock. Supplementary question. Speaker, I know they spent millions of taxpayer dollars on those ads, so they want to get their money's worth. But what if I told you there is a province where 2 million Ontarians cannot find a family doctor and we have a Premier who is not doing his job? Mr. Speaker, to be joined in the House today by steel workers from the great city of Sault Ste. Marie, they're here to ask for help after 10,000 patients. 10,000 patients were notified that they're going to lose primary medical care at the Group Health Centre. The Centre was founded by steel workers. They agreed to payroll deductions to build it and to support workers and their families, and it came with an agreement, Speaker, that they would receive healthcare for the rest of their lives. Now, with those physicians retiring or resigning, there is no one to replace them. That's the reality in the province of Ontario. There is no plan for the founding members or the historical commitment made to them. So I want to ask the Premier, what is this government doing right now to address the urgent crisis in primary care in Sault Ste. Marie? To reply to the Deputy Premier and Minister of Health. Thank you very much, Speaker. You know, the primary care expansion that the Premier just mentioned, those 78 expansions and new, two of them are happening in Sault Ste. Marie. We are committed to making sure that people of Sault Ste. Marie and across Ontario have access to primary care, and that is exactly why we have invested $110 million in expanding 78 primary care teams. Now, I contrast that to a previous Liberal government who actually cut residency positions in the province of Ontario. And, Speaker, if they had not cut those residency positions, we would have upwards of 300 physicians practicing in the province of Ontario today. But we won't stop there. We will continue to work with Sault Ste. Marie, with primary care practitioners, with nurse-led practitioner clinics to make sure that access is there in community. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you. Final supplementary. I want to be completely clear, and I'm going to go back to the Premier on this again. 10,000 people in Northern Ontario are expected to lose primary care by May of this year. 10,000 more. 3,000 already lost it. And they're expecting another 6,000 patients to lose care. They're on the brink. In total, more than a quarter of the population of Sault Ste. Marie is slated to lose access to primary care. That's unacceptable to me, and it should be unacceptable to this Premier. Speaker, the official opposition NDP is joining steel workers and retirees in the call for an immediate strategy to recruit and deploy primary care doctors and healthcare professionals to Sault Ste. Marie and to other communities in Northern Ontario, deeply impacted. So to the Premier, when will this government commit to the recruitment and retention strategy for healthcare workers in Northern Ontario? Please take their seats. Minister of Health. We started that work in 2018 when we expanded the access to nurses, to nurse practitioners, to physicians, increasing their access to train in the province of Ontario. We also worked with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario to make sure that as people were coming into Ontario and Canada, they were quickly assessed and ultimately approved when appropriate. You know, the member from Sault Ste. Marie has been working actively with his community to make sure that these patients are getting access. That work started immediately. I don't know where the NDP have been. I can tell you, since 2018, when we formed government, that work has been expanding, and we will continue to be there for the people of Sault Ste. Marie and everyone in Ontario who wants access to it. Question. Once again, the leader of the opposition. Standing right here, raising the alarm. This government has been in power for six years, and healthcare is worse today than it ever has been. The steel workers of the Sioux understand the need to protect healthcare today and into the future. That's why they have suggested immediate solutions that will continue to pay off for years and years to come. It includes a plan to support internationally trained doctors to practice in this province, and they've called for an expert panel as well that's going to help expedite the training and mentoring that's needed to bring doctors to communities like Sioux St. Marie. These solutions could be implemented immediately. They could have been implemented yesterday if this government had the political will to do so. So to the Premier, will he stop making excuses and act now, urgently bring doctors to Sioux St. Marie? Order. Minister of Health. With the greatest of respect, Speaker. Where was the party opposite when we were actually investing, when we were expanding residency positions in the province of Ontario? The opposition voted against it. Where was the opposition standing when we brought in investments, when we directed the College of Physicians and Surgeons to assess and ultimately license? We now have for the first time in the province of Ontario, as of right rules that mean if you want to practice in Ontario, you can do that without the red tape of the practice ready physicians. It's concrete changes that we are making that we are seeing the impact in our communities. You know, name me the last time we have expanded multidisciplinary teams by 78 in the province of Ontario. It's historic. Those are changes that are going to make a difference in communities like Chapeau, like Sioux St. Marie, like Timmins, like Sudbury, like Innisfil, like Woodstock. These are communities that are getting expansions that desperately want access to primary care. And we're giving it to them through an investment of $110 million. Thank you. And the supplementary question. Speaker, where are these phantom doctors? Where are these phantom doctors? The people of Sioux St. Marie would love to know. They would love to know. It is unacceptable, Speaker. And I'm not going to stop asking this until we get an answer from this government. If these patients in Sioux St. Marie lose access to their primary care doctors, they're going to be forced to rely on those increasingly crowded emergency rooms for their basic needs. The closest emergency room outside of Sioux St. Marie is four hours away. We heard today of somebody who waited 15 hours recently who has lost their doctor. Access to primary care should not depend on where we live. Across the province, I am hearing from countless, countless Ontarians who are worried about losing access to health care as well. For doctors, it's not just about staff or office spaces. It's also about housing and transportation and access to other services. It's impossible for hospitals and clinics to request health care workers when there's no accessible housing or transportation. I will tell you what, I will not take lessons from the member from Sioux St. Marie who has failed his community so badly. So badly. Please take your seat. Member for Sioux St. Marie will come to order. Member for Kitchener Conestoga will come to order. You know that's why. You know. You guys constantly. Perhaps the member for Sioux St. Marie and the member for Kitchener Conestoga didn't hear me call them to order. The Premier can respond. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Again, what have I told you, Mr. Speaker? There is an area. Order. That the leader, leader of the opposition really insulted the 2400 doctors that graduated last year and called them phantom doctors. And if that applies to the all 10,000, I wonder if the 17,500 nurses, a record here in Ontario, if they're phantom nurses as well. I wonder if the new universities that we're building, medical schools across the province. Are phantom universities. I wonder if the 260 undergraduates and 449 post graduates seats if they're phantom seats. Mr. Speaker, I'm wondering about the health care that is an all time high right now at $81 billion. We've spent over $21 billion more in the last five years than the last eight years. Thank you. Thank you. Please take a seat. I'll supplement you once again, the leader of the opposition. Thank you very much. I want to use my last supplementary to ask about another emerging health care issue. This government's privatisation for profit scheme is leaving patients across this province frustrated and very, very deeply worried about being charged for medically necessary services. The Minister of Health has stood there and said that they're expanding private cataract surgeries. But we have more reports today that dozens of patients are being over billed and charged for additional lenses and services that they did not ask for. This is exactly what we warned about. Patients being told that they will only have to use their health card are just being handed a bill for thousands of dollars after their treatment. The Minister's response has been incredibly disappointing, Speaker. She recognised this practice as a violation of the Commitment to Medicare Act but has not affixed the State any solutions to protect patients. Speaker, I'm going to ask the Minister and I don't want to hear that these patients consented to it because it's clear that patients were misled by this clinic. Minister, when will you enforce your own regulations and stop companies profiting off the backs of patients? Order, the Minister of Health. So I think it's important to put some numbers and facts on the table, Speaker. In the province of Ontario every single year we have 150,000 cataract and minor surgeries happening. So over the course of two years where the member opposite is talking about 13 complaints, we in fact had 300,000 minor eye surgeries and cataracts in the province of Ontario. Speaker, those are real people. Those are real people who are now talking and reading books to their grandchildren, who are now volunteering back in community, who are now back in their car driving around. We have people who are impacted when we make decisions to expand surgical and diagnostic centres in the province of Ontario. And in fact, in the last year, one single announcement that the Premier made in January of 2023 led to 17,000 additional people getting access to cataract and minor eye surgeries. Those are the facts. Thank you. The next question, the member for Kiwetanong. My name is Miigwe. My name is Miigwe. My question is with the Premier. Speaker, the health care system in Northern Ontario has huge challenges. We are short hundreds of doctors and people are getting sicker. People are dying. This is the Ontario that I know. Two weeks ago, the Snabaski Nation declared a health state of emergency across the whole north, not just on reserves. This government doesn't have the courtesy to respond when emergencies get declared. Speaker, Northern health care should not operate in a state of emergency. Will government, will you respond to the state of emergency? Yes or no? Deputy Premier and Minister of Health. Speaker, perhaps the member opposite is not aware of the fact that in fact our Minister of Indigenous Affairs, our Associate Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and myself have all actively engaged in conversations and offered solutions and assistance to the people of Northern Ontario. I want to highlight again the expansions that we are making in Northern Ontario that will directly impact communities. Moussinean area, getting a brand new community, Winnebago area, health authority team, porcupine, cappus casing, Sudbury, Berks Falls, Timmins, Chaplot, Wawa, Pottawasen. We have communities in Northern Ontario who need action from our government and we have given it with the announcement of 78 expansions of primary care expansion teams in the province of Ontario. We will always be there with our partners to make sure that we assist. But these expansions are something that I very much hope that you and your party will support when we put it in our budget. Thank you. Remind the members to make their comments to the chair. The supplementary question, the member. Thank you, Speaker. In another shameful milestone for this government, Sudbury now has a private, for-profit, nurse practitioner led clinic who charges money to patients for each and every visit. The nurse practitioner said, and I will quote her words, had the Caprio Clinic received funding to hire a permanent position, I would have likely stayed there. End of quote. Speaker, I have hand-delivered modest funding proposal from the Caprio Nurse Practitioner-led clinic to the Minister of Health numerous times since 2021. We have under-employed nurse practitioner clinic in Northern Ontario that would love to care for us in the public system, but this government is bent into private clinics only, forcing them to go to the private sector. When will the Caprio Nurse Practitioner-led clinic get the money they have been asking for since 2021? Minister of Health. Thank you, Speaker. So when the Shacklow and District Family Health team received an expansion in the primary care expansion announcement from last month that will serve an additional over 2,000 residents in her community, does she plan to support or vote against that initiative? 2,200 people that will get access to primary care in your own community. We have 78 examples of that across Ontario, in Thunder Bay, in Kenora and Area District. We are making the investments. What I'd like to know from the member opposite is whether they are going to support those expansions to the country. Thank you. The next question, the member for New Market, Aurora. Thank you for the Minister of Long-Term Care. Every senior in Ontario deserves access to quality care and quality of life, both now and into the future. But Speaker, many families, like those in my riding of New Market, Aurora, are concerned about the safety and well-being of their loved ones in long-term care homes. While our province already has the toughest inspection and enforcement program in Canada, we must take further action to improve compliance and provide comfort and certainty to residents and their families. Speaker, can the Minister please tell the House what our government is doing to strengthen oversight and residents' safety in long-term care homes? Here, here. Good question. To apply for the government, the Minister of Long-Term Care. Thank you, Speaker. The member addresses some very valid concerns for her constituents because it goes beyond just building long-term care homes, which this government is doing to a record level. It goes beyond just health, human resources, which this government is doing to record levels once again. It's about the safety of those in long-term care homes. Since I was appointed five and a half months ago, we have been working tirelessly to ensure that that is our number one priority within the long-term care setting, supported by an investment of $72.3 million. I announced last month the formation of Ontario's first dedicated long-term care investigative unit. The new 10-member unit will go after the worst offenders in the long-term care system, and I want to be very clear, Speaker, I hope that they never have to be used. Speaker, these investigators have the authority to add more accountability, to address the most serious forms of non-compliance, so I can be sure that their loved ones are safe. Speaker, I'll repeat it in this legislature once again. Our seniors took care of us. It is our turn to take care of them. And the supplementary question. Speaker, and it's great to hear the Minister talk about the measures our government is taking to ensure every long-term care resident lives with dignity and is offered the care they deserve. While this is an important step forward in protecting Ontario seniors, some individuals are concerned that it will be used to punish workers in the sector. Speaker, we know that frontline staff are essential in providing quality care to residents each and every day. That's why our government must build on the progress already made and continue to invest in initiatives that will expand and enhance the long-term care workforce. Speaker, can the Minister please elaborate on how our government is supporting staff in long-term care homes to deliver safe and effective care? Good question. Minister of long-term care. Thank you, Speaker. That's very fair. And the member raises, well, what's probably the most important piece of our long-term care home system, and that is the hardworking frontline healthcare workers who make these homes homes every single day, doing the work for our loved ones that frankly many of us cannot do. Speaker, this unit is set out, and I want to be very clear on this, to go after the worst offenders and hold them to account for their actions. And as I said, we hope they are never used. Service to our residents is the most important thing. That's why our government is making sure we take care of our staff and give them the tools to do their jobs better. Just last fall, we invested $300 million to recruit thousands of PSWs to the long-term care sector. In 2023 alone, we increased the local priorities fund by $35 million to support residents with complex needs. We also invested $342 million into immediate and longer-term recruitment initiatives that would add over 13,000 workers to Ontario's healthcare system. This includes 5,000 new and up-skilled registered nurses and registered practical nurses, as well as 8,000 PSWs. Speaker, the cat's out the bag. This Premier has taken care of frontline healthcare workers and the amazing residents with long-term care systems. The next question, the member for Windsor West. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Earlier this month, the Mayor of Belleville declared a local state of emergency after EMS responded to 17 drug overdoses in just over 24 hours, with a total of 23 overdoses in less than 48 hours. Devastated by the loss and desperate for support, the Mayor of Belleville reached out to this Conservative government only to have the request ignored. Belleville needs $2 million to fund a local health and social services hub and a detox centre to address the ongoing addictions and overdose crisis. There is no time to wait. The community wants to see a new service hub open by the end of this year. So my question to the Premier is this. Will you immediately fund the desperately needed service hub and detox centre for Belleville? To apply the Associate Minister of Mental Health and Addictions. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you for the question. Mr. Speaker, after decades of neglect by previous governments, caused addictions and support services in Ontario have rotted. They are non-existent. And it's a deeply unfortunate situation in Belleville. But unlike those governments, we take these issues seriously and we have already taken action to alleviate the pressure on the city and have begun discussions on longer term solutions. Last week, I joined the Member for Bay of Quinty in Belleville where we announced emergency funding to address the immediate needs of the community as identified by the CMHA. We're helping them increase temporary staffing at key service providers, add mental health supports for existing staff, improve security in the downtown area, and purchase new equipment for outreach teams, and service providers that will help them identify and intervene early in the events of an overdose. We also met with the Mayor, the first responders at healthcare agencies, to talk about the situation, how we're going to work together to improve mental health and addictions care in Belleville. Mr. Speaker, we have a clear agenda to ensure that we build a system that will help the people of Belleville. And Mr. Secretary mentioned questions. Thank you, Speaker. With all due respect to the Associate Minister, you have been in government for six years. The overdose crisis, the number of people dying, the service cuts has been under your watch. It's time to take responsibility and stop putting it off on somebody else. Belleville desperately needs adequate funding to build and operate a local service hub, not measly one-time funding. They need reliable, continuous support to address the addictions and overdose crisis. The community has been asking, pleading for this funding for months, with no answer from this government. It's not a tough ask as the Conservative Member for that writing and the Associate Minister told the Mayor. What's tough is watching our family members and our community members overdose and die in the streets. Last week, the Premier acknowledged the need to urgently fund mental health and addiction supports, but the people of Belleville still have no commitment for a much-needed service hub and detox centre in their community. So I asked the Premier again, will you honour your promise about increasing supports by immediately funding the construction and operation of a local health and social services hub and detox centre in Belleville? Yes or no? Please take the seats now, my members, to make their comments through the Chair, the Associate Minister of Mental Health and Addictions. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And once again, I'd like to point out to my colleague on the other side of the house just where we are and to suggest that we haven't done anything in the last six years. Mr. Speaker, this is the first government to have a minister responsible for mental health and addiction. The first government to invest historic amounts in mental health and addictions. And let's just start with where we began.  How about the fact that you're the ones that created the doctor shortage in the first place? How about the fact that you cut $53 million in mental health supports when you were in power? How about the fact that you voted against the roadmap? You did not provide the support to the government in ensuring that we built the system of care in the first place. We need a continuum of care, not piecemeal solutions. What we are doing as a government is ensuring that that continuum of care in the first place will not only abel the response everywhere across the province of Ontario. We've opened 400 beds, 7,000 treatment spots. Stop the clock. Let's start the clock. The next question, the member for Brantford Grant. Thank you, Speaker. The next question is for the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Ontario's agricultural and food industry contributes over $48 billion to our province's GDP and our economy. In my writing of Brantford Grant, there are over 1,400 agri-food businesses that all serve a vital role in contributing to Ontario's economic prosperity and job creation. That's why it is of critical importance that our government supports measures that strengthen and grow this vital sector. People in my writing were thrilled to hear the Minister first announced a Grow Ontario Strategy to expand production and enhance efficiency. Speaker, can the Minister please provide the house with an update on what our government is doing to implement the strategy and ensure we are supporting the agriculture and food sector. Thank you. To reply, the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate the question from the member from Brantford Grant very much because it allows us to stand in this house to share with everyone and to those watching live that our Grow Ontario Strategy is working. For example, we had put out in our strategy that we wanted to increase exports of Ontario grown and produced food by 30% by the year 2020. Essentially, we've actually increased exports by 20.9%. Ladies and gentlemen, research is so important and we need to continue to innovate and our strategy set out that we wanted to see more than 250 patents and licenses realised by the year 2032. And through to 2022 to the end of 2023, we actually saw 43 patents and licenses realised through funding by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Our strategy is on the mark and it's working. Thank you, Speaker and thank you, Minister, for that response. Speaker, from the Minister's response it's clear that our government has committed to tangible actions that will ensure the continuous growth of the agri-food sector in Ontario. Speaker, agri-food businesses in my community and across the province expect their government to implement measures that are innovative and will address their needs. It's critical that our government ensures that these industries have access to new processes and new equipment and new technology to expand production and enhance efficiency. Speaker, can the Minister please provide an update on some of the actions and results of the new Grow Ontario strategy? Thank you. Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Thank you very much, Speaker and I really am pleased and proud to share with you that not only are farmers responding to the importance and the need to drive innovation to realize efficiencies and increased yields, but our processors are as well and our programs are hitting the mark. Just last week I was in Strathroy and I visited in Orterra. It's a processing plant that specializes in frozen vegetables and they actually have plants in Strathroy, Ingersoll and Tecumseh in southwestern Ontario and they process 635 million pounds of frozen vegetables and last year they actually invested in new technologies to drive line efficiencies that ultimately resulted from a new enhanced bagging and scale piece of equipment. This spring based on success, they're actually investing in new optical sorting equipment that will drive continued product quality. Again, Speaker, our strategy to grow Ontario is working and it's... Thank you very much. Thank you. The next question, the member for Thunder Bay Superior North. Thank you, Speaker, to the Minister of Natural Resources through you, Speaker. As you know, the mill in Terrace Bay has been idled since January. I have met with the union leadership, mayors, First Nations chiefs, our provincial and federal representatives and small business owners in Terrace Bay and Scriber and nothing has happened to slow down the potential social and economic collapse of these communities. There are 500 direct lost jobs but 1900 jobs at risk throughout the region. Given that the owners of the mill won't communicate beyond saying they will entertain offers of purchase, I'm wondering what update the government can share with these workers about their plans to address this problem. The Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry. Thank you very much, Mr Speaker and thank you for the question and first and foremost our thoughts are with those workers in Terrace Bay in that mill that has been idled and we want to get them back to work as soon as possible. That's why, Mr Speaker, the moment that this happened, we started outreach not only to the workers but to the mayors of the affected communities all through the sector that are presented to us to work with the owners, to work with the sector to find a way to get this mill back up and running again. Speaker, we know that the forestry sector is a very integrated sector and when something like this happens, it can cause challenges all throughout the sector. We are leaving no stone unturned to find a way to get this mill back open. Whether it's with the current owner or whether it's with another operator, we know that this mill in Terrace Bay in northern Ontario still remains bright. We will find ways to get over this hurdle and continue to make northern Ontario the strong powerhouse that it deserves to be. Back to the minister, thank you for that response. The company received almost $130 million in provincial grants yet they don't appear to have any responsibility toward the workers or toward remediating the extensive pollution they have left behind. Who is going to ensure that the company does not get away with leaving a huge clean up liability for a potential buyer or the community of Terrace Bay? Thank you very much Mr. Speaker and again we continue to work with ownership of the mill to ensure that everything remains compliant and that this mill opens again. The single best thing that will happen is that this mill opens again continues to produce the products that make northern Ontario strong through the integrated forestry sector and we can work through the challenges that exist today and to a future tomorrow. Mr. Speaker this government continues to invest in the forestry sector in Ontario will make no bones about that we want to ensure that this sector is very strong in the northwest in the northeast and all throughout and I'll use that word many many times integrated forestry sector that exists in this province. It is one of the back bones of our province economy and 142,000 people work in this sector we're making investments every day whether it's through our biomass program forestry innovation program to ensure that opportunities continue to exist in forestry in Ontario now and well into the future. Thank you the next question the member for Don Valley East Mr. Speaker for the premier 60 seconds isn't enough time to list this government's failures in health care but let's give it a try what if I told you emergency room wait times are the worst they've ever been and ER closures have become the norm that's because we're losing family doctors faster than we're gaining them and thousands of patients are losing primary care overnight on top of that bill 124 has shattered our workforce for nothing we sure got that done and there's still no health care worker attention plan so now temporary staffing agencies have stepped in and are burning a hole in our hospitals and long-term care homes but the premier says just let it burn as your hospital debts are ballooning and they're being forced to rely on high interest loans because this government does not have their back and now desperate patients are being forced to turn to private for-profit clinics that are overcharging elderly patients while this government turns a blind eye Mr. Speaker why should this government trust any of the premier's promises when all he has to show for his efforts is this long list of health care woes premier Mr. Mr. Mr. Speaker you know as I said before your government destroyed the health care system here in Ontario Mr. Speaker they fired 1600 nurses we've registered 80,000 nurses 17,500 last year alone Mr. Speaker they were so dysfunctional the Olmay the Ontario Medical Association wouldn't even speak to them they shut down hospital beds like we've never seen they created hallway health care Mr. Speaker what we've done we've added 35 100 beds and another 3,000 beds we've added 10,000 doctors we've added 80,000 nurses we're building universities that are going to create the next doctors order premier will take a seat premier will take a seat the member for Ottawa South will put the cards back in his wallet supplementary question member for Don Valley East while the premier loves to fall back on the liberal mismanagement distraction he does nothing but highlight his own mismanagement which is quite frankly beyond comparison you know Mr. Speaker the government loves to brag about all the money it's spent on health care but what does it have to show for it you wouldn't see me bragging about spending millions of dollars on a car that doesn't start this government has created a problem that it cannot fix through you Mr. Speaker to all Ontarians they're not thinking about your future they're thinking about their future they don't care about bringing your emergency room wait times down and they don't care about emergency room closures they don't care about keeping your family doctor ear nose practitioner they don't care about anything unless someone is making a profit whether it's temporary nursing agencies private for profit clinics developers drooling over the green belt like staples shoppers drug bar and law bluster government will always lead with greed Mr. Speaker when will this government realize they could give the people of Ontario so much more if they'd only focus on people not profits the deputy premier and minister of health oh speaker let's do a bit of compare and contrast shall we yeah liberal government cut residency positions in the province of Ontario shame shame conservative government actually expands residency positions and two new medical schools in the province of Ontario in Brampton and in Scarborough your previous order the previous liberal premier acknowledged after you were defeated that her biggest regret was how she decimated the healthcare system it was your premier and your leader who said that order we have the minister of health I had to interrupt because I couldn't hear what she was saying because of the noise in the house I'm going to ask the member for Ottawa south to come to order and the government house leader to come to order is there still time for the minister of health to conclude order start the clock minister of health you know the numbers show that we are investing more in healthcare in the province of Ontario and we did that speaker without raising taxes how did we do that we did that by expanding the economy to make sure that more people are working in the province of Ontario to make sure that people are investing in the province of Ontario and by doing that we've been able to invest and expand the healthcare budget by over 20 billion dollars the house will come to order the next question the member for Mississauga Erin Mills thank you Mr. Speaker my question is for the associate minister of housing like many provinces in Ontario is in a housing supply crisis which has been decades in making the area as we need to see improvement is in purpose build rental housing due to excessive rate of tape and high construction costs fewer rental units have been built over the past 40 years in fact over 80% of the Ontario purpose build rental units were built before 1980 that's why our government must continue to take action to ensure we are improving rental housing construction across the province Speaker can the minister please update the house on the brokers our government has made on purpose build rental housing to apply the associate minister of housing thank you Speaker and thank you to the member from Mississauga Erin Mills for that question know that Ontario set a new record in 2023 on purpose built rental housing it was the largest in our history even above 2022 which is record CMHA says that we got nearly 19,000 new starts last year up 27% but we know we know speakers that much more to be done in that arena and also in all types of housing construction but results count and our actions are working we've lowered development charges we've reduced red tape and the cost associated with it and we've removed the HST thank you to the minister of finance and the premier for advocating a job well done Speaker there's much more to do we know there is but the best is yet to come Speaker I thank the associate minister for the response it is great to hear how our government is building more new homes and getting them built faster Speaker my constituents were pleased to hear that we are committed to building 20,000 new homes in Mississauga as part of our plan to build 1.5 million homes by 2031 but speaker we know that the former mayor failed to address the housing supply crisis in the city under Boney Cromby to know Mississauga only hit 27% of its 10 years target one of the worst records in Ontario of Mississauga deserve stronger leadership to help them achieve their dreams of home ownership can the minister tell the house how Boney Cromby anti-housing agenda has made it harder to build homes in Mississauga the associate minister of housing well thank you speaker the record is clear Mayor Cromby had the worst housing record in the province of Ontario allow me to give you some examples last May Mississauga wouldn't approve an application for nearly 4700 units why? because the buildings were too tall shadows next Mayor Cromby also blocked 703 unit housing proposal that would replace a strip mall why? she went on record to say she opposed the building because her favourite was in the mall tens prevented thousands of people of having a roof over their head why speaker? shadows and cake good gracious speaker Spas Cromby's housing record was abysmal speaker Ontario families cannot afford Bonnie Cromby the member for London West thank you speaker the premier speaker Ontario colleges and universities are bracing for the impact of a 50% reduction in international study permits at a time when the sector is already at a breaking point this was detailed in the blue ribbon panel report which highlighted decades of chronic underfunding and years of declining provincial grants speaker does this premier understand how critical secondary institutions are to our province's well-being and prosperity and will he commit to providing the urgent funding needed immediately to keep our colleges and universities afloat to apply the minister of colleges and universities thank you Mr. Speaker and thank you to the member for that question but quite frankly we were very disappointed with the federal government who did no consultations whatsoever with the provinces and I ask you today what have you done and advocate for more seats in this province I've heard from members all across my side and from Mr. Ministries the impact this is going to have on our economy at Roma I had an opportunity to meet with the tourism industry who were saying they're going to be devastated without these students it is going to be such an impact on the economy that's why when we're working with the federal government on the allocations we will be looking at the labour market needs across regions in Ontario as number one priority also ensuring that there is guaranteed housing for international students international students coming to our campus will be a priority and ensuring that the economic needs of each region is a concern as well but Mr. Speaker this is going to be an impact across Ontario and the federal government did absolutely no consultations with the provinces nor with the sector I'll remind the members to make the comments through the chair the supplementary question the federal announcement was last month we've had years we've had decades of chronic underfunding by this government and the Liberals before them which has put our post-secondary institution starved for resources and now they are on the brink Ontario has had the lowest per student funding in Canada since they started keeping statistics spending half or less of what other provinces do we have at least 10 universities and now many colleges facing deficits which is going to put the sector and our communities at risk students are already struggling with cuts to OSAP and cuts to student supports and services they should not be expected to cover this government's failure to properly fund with tuition increases what exactly is this government's plan to keep Ontario's colleges and universities solvent and sustainable Minister of colleges and universities thank you Mr. Speaker and what I want to say is what we are doing for students under the leadership of this premier is keeping tuition affordable for students across the province this is not a burden that is going to be on the backs of students Mr. Speaker I want to thank the blue ribbon panel for the recommendations and for the hard work they have been doing and as I have said we will be announcing our path forward shortly but Mr. Speaker when we look at the impact this is going to have from the federal government's decision job creation and trade comes here every week with a new company wanting to come to Ontario and why is that because of the skilled labour force that we have in this province I have talked to our colleges and universities about the impact it is going to have I was at Fanshawe College recently with the member from the area and we heard directly from them Volkswagen came here to the area because of the skilled labour market Fanshawe is concerned about that I have talked to George in college this is going to be a huge impact and the fact that the federal government did this with absolutely zero consultation with the provinces and the post secondary institution the next question the next question the member for Chatham Kent Leamington thank you speaker my question is for the minister of natural resources and forestry Ontario has records for nearly 27,000 oil and gas wells located in my writing of Chatham Kent Leamington in 2021 a devastating explosion occurred in the village of Wheatley because of gas that surfaced through an abandoned well in the area it was heartbreaking that 20 people were injured from my community and several buildings severely damaged our government has since taken a robust action in helping my community rebuild and heal but we must continue to come together overcome challenges and ensure that across Ontario have a bright and safe future can the minister please share what our government is doing to tackle risks posed by inactive oil and gas wells good question minister of natural resources and forestry thank you speaker and thank you to the member from Chatham Kent Leamington for the question boy he's doing a great job for his constituents every day including the people in Wheatley I know they really appreciate it recently I had a chance to be in Norfolk and Mayor Martin and her council and members of the fire and rescue staff there for a great announcement a $2 million announcement supporting municipalities throughout southwestern Ontario allowing them to purchase protective equipment like gas monitoring equipment to ensure a plug gas wells remain safe providing training to emergency responders making investments customized to their community that matter most and I just highlight Wheatley again Mr. Speaker because recently Chatham Kent Fire and Rescue have been handing out personal protective gas monitors for homes and resident of the town Kelly Addison said it's nice to have an alarm so we feel safe and those alarms are being paid for using a provincial grant from the ministry of natural resources and forestry speaker is all about keeping people safe in their communities and making investments that matter like the $23.6 million in our community thank you the supplementary question thank you minister and thank you the minister for his response and for personally coming to my community several times to listen to work with experts and take decisive action it's reassuring to see our government is committed to keeping communities safe with this investment communities like Wheatley will be able to prevent petroleum related emergencies in the future and deliver better protection for all of Ontario the dangers of oil and gas wells as evident from my community are serious and ongoing our government must continue to do all we can to reduce risks and ensure that our plan addresses our municipalities needs speaker can the minister please elaborate on how our government is working to improve both emergency preparedness and risk prevention for communities across Ontario the supplementary question minister of natural resources thank you very much speaker and thanks again for the question and as I was saying the geology of south west Ontario is unique and it presented opportunities but also presents safety challenges and risks that are unique to that part of the province of Ontario that's why Mr. Speaker $23.6 million as I said in my first answer is being invested to ensure safety for those residents to plug more wells more than the opposition ever considered plugging when they were on the case Mr. Speaker and for example we're doing more on the innovation side too to get ahead of this $6 million for scientific studies and research to improve our understanding of these wells while providing better risk mitigation for our teams on the ground Mr. Speaker we know there's always more work to do on this file will continue to engage with municipalities, landowner, industry indigenous communities the public as we work to ensure the safety of those in southern Ontario that are counting on us and we're delivering Mr. Speaker my question is to the minister of transportation on February 1st and 2nd, Kirkland Lake and to Mr. Speaker and enforcement officers from the MTO did a commercial safety blitz on trucks I'd like to thank the officers I'd like to thank all the truckers who actually run a safe rig in the companies but on February 1st and 2nd 75 trucks were pulled over for inspection 36 were pulled off the road for safety pulled off the road nearly half the trucks on the TransCanada Highway that day were pulled off the road under the minister's watch is that acceptable Mr. Speaker we have increased enforcement all across the province especially focusing on the north Mr. Speaker safety is the top priority for this government and I thank those hard working officers and MTO officials that are on the roads and making sure that our roads are safe we have some of the safest roads in all of North America we will continue to do to have the highest standards of training higher standards of road safety as we have done whether that be investing in critical infrastructure expanding highways investing in keeping those highways safe like Highway 17 and I'm very proud of the work that those officers have done to keep those streets safe and continue to have that compliance and enforcement across our highways especially in the north Mr. Speaker safety is a top priority and we will do whatever we can to keep the people of this province safe especially on our roads especially our truck drivers and those who travel on those roads e-supplementary questions Thanks Speaker thanks for that answer with all due respect so on February 1st and 2nd half the trucks on the trans-Canada were unsafe and a blitz so it's safe to assume that the other days like today also half of them are unsafe and another little statistic for tamiskaming if your car is registered to tamiskaming your 4 times is likely to die in an accident than if it's registered in Toronto so once again this was a blitz but what about when the blitzes aren't happening what is this government going to do to ensure that all trucks are safe on the trans-Canada not just half Thank you Speaker Mr. Transportation Thank you very much Mr. Speaker and to that member we've actually had a blitz going especially in the north we've been targeted for focus since July of this year Mr. Speaker it's been a plan that we have listened to and looked at the concerns by many in the industry and increased enforcement across the north Mr. Speaker it's also why we're investing over $3 billion in improving our roads every single year and Mr. Speaker every measure that we've taken whether it's been adding more lights expanding lanes the 2 plus 1 pilot that we were running in the north those members right there have voted against it every single time when it comes to safety when it comes to increasing enforcement when it comes to increasing the number of officers that we have on the road the NDP and Liberal have voted against those safety measures that's unacceptable Mr. Speaker the government will continue to invest in our enforcement officers will continue to invest in making our roads safer and the necessary improvements to support that safety the next question the member for Oakville North Speaker my question is for the Associate Minister of Women's Social and Economic Opportunity we know that supporting more women in the workforce benefits Ontario's economy especially in-demand sectors such as the skilled trades at the present time the number of women employed in the skilled trades is well below their male counterparts in 2022 women accounted for only 8.1% of the labour force in trades transport and related occupations in Ontario that's why it is critical for our government to continue to invest in programs that break down barriers for women so that they have the tools they need to join the workforce Speaker can the Associate Minister highlight some of the ways our government is expanding opportunities for women to find good work and good pay in the skilled trades The Associate Minister of Women's Social and Economic Opportunity Thank you Speaker and thank you to the member from Oakville North Burlington for the question it's good to be back in the house and to share some of the amazing things that women are building across Ontario from being 10,000 feet deep in a mine in Timmins and talking to the skilled women working underground from discussions with the chambers today in Brockville Kitchener just to name a few of the writings that have had the privilege to visit I heard how women are being empowered and are helping to build a stronger Ontario together alongside these women our government is working to build women's economic opportunities and increase their safety through financial independence and that's why I was very pleased to recently announce the expansion and call for applications to the economic security program which will bring us close to that goal and the supplementary question Thank you to the Associate Minister for her response it is encouraging that our government is focused on investments and initiatives that will support women to become economically secure and independent Ontario is facing the largest labour shortage in a generation with thousands of jobs going unfilled in the skilled trades it's critical that we provide supports for women to pursue fulfilling and good paying careers in these sectors Can the Associate Minister share with the House how our government is expanding and increasing training opportunities for women The Associate Minister Thank you Speaker Well the women's economic security program provides training for low income women to equip them with the skills, the knowledge and the experience to get a job and to ensure their success participants can also access wraparound supports Since its inception in 2018 we know this program has been working because the women's economic security program has helped thousands of women either start a business or get a job in the skilled trades so it's time to build on these results and I'm very pleased to announce that our government is increasing the investment to this program with a total investment this year to 5.5 million and that marks nearly a 10% increase to the program this year alone so this will allow more women across Ontario to access the supports they need to enter or re-enter the workforce build rewarding careers and increase their safety through financial independence because in Ontario we truly believe that when women succeed Ontario succeeds Thank you Speaker That concludes our question period for this morning I have two members who I want to raise points of order to understand the first one Member for Ottawa, Vania Thank you Mr. Speaker I am seeking unanimous consent that notwithstanding standing order 100A for 5 minutes be allotted to the independent members as a group to speak to being private members public business today I'm collared as seeking unanimous consent that notwithstanding standing order 100A 4 that 5 minutes be allotted to the independent members as a group to speak during private members public business today Agreed? I heard a no Member for Sudbury has a point of order Thank you Mr. Speaker I'd like to do an introduction for some steel workers who came down from St. Marie they weren't able to be here in time for directions this morning I want to welcome a district director Miles Sullivan Bernie Thorpe of the steel workers organization of active retirees and from USW 2251 Joe... Joe K you know I know your name Rebecca McCracken Hans de Fader Thank you very much Speaker Steel workers make great leaders There being no further business this morning this house stands in recess until 3pm


A nerve conduction study is a non-invasive test which measures how well and how fast the nerves can send electrical signals. For this procedure, you are given a hospital gown to change into and settled comfortably in a private area throughout the procedure. You will need to remove your ornaments, accessories, purse, belt, etc. The technician then attaches electrodes on the affected limbs. A very small amount of current is applied to measure the electrical signals in the nerve and you may feel slight discomfort. The technician gives an appropriate gap between consequence stimulations to minimize the discomfort. Post procedure, the technician will remove the electrodes as well as clean the gel using cotton and tissues. Your reports will be issued in an hour at the reception after the procedure.