And we'll use Linux as the example. And you'll have a small homework task. The next one will be setting permissions on users to achieve some goal, not too hard. Everyone uses Linux. Yes, if you've taken my lab, if not, you'll learn it very quickly. So to understand about, we're going to look at an example of discretionary access control. We need to know something about the Linux operating system and how it implements permissions. So these are some extra slides about Linux, about the file system. That is how we arrange the files, the directories and files. We're not going to go through all of those slides. We'll go direct to the thing about permissions. So in Linux, we talk about files and directories. What's a directory? A folder with respect to the right? We know what files are. So we have some area of storage on the disk that saves some information. But what's a directory? Well, one thing we can think of a directory. A directory keeps track of a set of files. It's some grouping of files. Inside this directory, there are some other files. So in Linux, we think of a directory is in fact a file that lists other files. If we go into a directory and we LS in that directory, we can see a set of other files. So for storage, we'll often think of a directory as a special type of file. There's like a list of other files, the file names in that directory. So we need to understand a little bit about the organization. The hierarchy of the directories is not important at this stage. But the files on your hard disk are organized in some manner. And there's different ways to store information about those files. And that's done by a file system. So the software for a file system keeps track of all your files and directories. There are different ways to do it. But we'll go through it a simple example and we'll refer to inodes. In Linux file systems and other file systems, files and directories are kept track by the operating system using inodes. Inodes are small data structures that keep track of some information about the file. You can think the file just occupies some blocks on disk, some areas on disk. But the inodes keep track of things like the file name, when that file was created and accessed, where it is, and the permissions for that file. So an inode in Linux is a data structure, stores information about a file or directory. It stores information about who's the owner of the file, how big it is, how many bytes, some timestamps. Timestamps can include when was it created, when was it last accessed. So we may create a file this time and then access it another time. We may keep track of both times. And where is the data for that file stored? So we think an inode is a small data structure and it points to the actual file, the data blocks on the disk. And the other thing it keeps track of is the mode in which that file can be accessed, the permissions. So what your operating system does is it has a list of inodes, one for each file. So it has a table, special area in the operating system that keeps track of the inodes, where each inode keeps track of some information about files and directories. Directories are files, but they're a special type. What a directory is, it's a file that points to other files and it points to the other files in that directory. So it points, keeps track of in this directory, if there are three files in that directory, then that with respect to the operating system, the inode keeps track of what are those three files, what are the inodes of those three files, how long the file names are and what are the file names. So because we say directories are a special case of files, they can also have permissions on them. Directories can have permissions. So we said the inode is a data structure that keeps track of information about files. This is the general information. More detail. We'll skip mode, we'll come back to that. There's the owner ID in Linux. There's a 16-bit user ID. Who is the owner of this file? There's one owner of every file. And there's one group associated with every file. So there's also a group ID. The size of the file in bytes is recorded. So this data structure records the file size. There are several timestamps. The node is A time, C time, M time. When that inode was accessed, when someone read the file last, when it was changed, when it was something was modified, and when the file data was modified. So the inode may be modified, but the file data not. For example, if we change permissions, the data structure changes, but the file contents do not. And at the start, we have 16 bits in this inode, in this data structure, that what we call the mode, the mode of the file. 12 bits are called the protection bits, which we will describe as the permissions on that file. And four bits determine the file type. So is it a regular file? Is it a directory? Or there are even some other special cases. So we can think every file has its own inode and stores this information. There are some other fields as well. So in more advanced cases, there are some other information. Let's have a look with an example. Here's our users logged in on our computer. We currently don't have any files. Let's create a file. We now have a file. We can see some information about the inode of that file using the command stat. Stat on that file shows us some details about that file. It shows us the file size, blocks. So this is something about the blocks on the disk. So different file systems may manage the disk blocks in different ways. It's a regular file. The inode is the data structure that keeps this information. And inodes have IDs or numbers. And this is inode number 156. So another file would have a different inode number. The inodes are just data structures that store this information. The user ID and user IDs are 16-bit numbers. But we often also have a mapping to a name. So there are actually numbers, but we usually convert that to a name. A group ID, so every file has a user owner and a group owner. The three different timestamps. When was this inode accessed? When was this inode modified? When was the file changed? So we keep track of three different values. And the other thing that we wanna focus on is the access control. These are the owners. What can the user do with this? The mode for the file. And these are what we call the 12 protection bits. Keep track of this information. It's stored in 12 bits, but those bits have meaning, so we'll interpret them. So that's an example of the inode information for file. We commonly look at details for a file using LS. And we see some of that in maybe a slightly easier form. The file name, the size, the time when the file was last modified, the user, the group, something about the mode. What's this number one mean? What's the number one mean? You've seen it many times. Something we probably haven't explained before. It's actually, it's to do with the number of links to this file. So I think you know most systems we can have shortcuts or links to files. So in a Linux system, other files can link to this one. And other inodes can link to this one. So we actually store the file once, but we have other inodes that point to this one. This is the number that link into this file. Usually we see it's one. Only in some special cases we'll see it's different than one. So we often ignore this number because we don't often see it change in our simple cases. So we wanna look at what do these, what are the access mode? What do these characters mean? What's this character mean?  The first dash, it means this is a file, not a directory. If it was a D, it's a directory. If it's a dash, it's a regular file, all right? So it's a regular file. It's just shorthand to say this is a regular file. Wrong way. It's the file type, all right? We actually have four bits to indicate the file type, but we'll commonly see either a regular file, a dash there, a directory. Maybe we'll see some others later. And then these are the next nine characters we're gonna look at. There are nine characters there. They're either set or unset. Each character actually is implemented as a single bit, on or off. So we just need to understand what the meaning of each character is or what each bit is. And I think most of you know that the sequence determines the access mode or the permissions on that file. Whether we can read, write, or execute that file from the perspective of the user that owns, the group that owns, and others. So we'll look at that in a bit more depth. So we just implement that by a single bit. If it's zero, we cannot. If it's one, we can. Or here the operating system shows the letter if we can or a dash if we cannot. So let's look at those bits. Here we say there are actually 12 permission bits or protection bits. We see nine there. There are nine characters. There are another three special cases. So there are 12 bits that determine the permissions on that file. We will look at the nine main ones, but there are some special cases as well. So with Linux, we talk about the access rights or the permissions being read, write, or execute. Read a file, you can see the contents. Write, you can modify the contents. Execute, you can run it. Especially if we have a script or a binary program, we can execute that file. What about a directory? Because directories are also special types of files. So they can also have permissions. What do they mean? We can read. If a directory has the read permission, it means we can see the contents of that directory. What files are inside that directory? Because a directory is just a file that lists the files inside it. If we can write, we can create and remove files from that directory. So if we can write to a directory, I can put a new file inside that directory, and I can delete a file from that directory. Execute a directory, that doesn't make sense. We can execute files, programs, but what the execute permission means, we use the same character, it means we can access files in the directory. And one thing you understand, we can change into that directory. We can CD into that directory as an example. We categorize users, we talk about the user that owns the file. There's a group that owns the file, and there may be users in that group. And then there's other users. So we can say there's one user that owns a file, there's a group of users for that file, and then there's the rest of the world, others. And we'll often use the letters U, G and O to refer to them. Or we can talk about all users on the system, hey. We said there were nine bits, sorry, 12 bits for protection. Well, read, write and execute for the user. There are three bits. Read, write and execute for the group, another three, and read, write and execute for others. So there's nine bits. Then there is three special cases. Set UID, set GID sticky bit. Remember them? Everyone have any questions? Anyone questions about the special bits? You probably haven't seen them in use. So we've seen the first nine bits in use in a lab. We haven't seen these special commissions in use. They're used to control some very special cases which I think we'll not demonstrate. And sometimes they're no longer used. That is, they had an original use, but no longer used for that purpose. One thing that they're still used for, for example, directories, this set UID bit, if we, so it's a bit, it's either on or off. If we set it on, it means that the files created in that directory are given the same user as the owner of the directory. So someone owns the directory, if a file is created inside that directory, the owner of that file is the one that owns the directory. It may not be the case if we set that to be off. So that's one thing that's used for. Similar with the group, the owner and the group. And one thing, the third bit that's called the sticky bit sometimes is used for is preventing users from removing or renaming files in a directory unless they are the owner. That is, in some cases, someone else's file is in your directory and you can delete their file. By using the sticky bit, you can control that such that you cannot delete their file. But if you don't remember those three, you'll be okay. Remember the first nine combinations. And this summarizes how we interpret it. Even though there are 12 bits in Linux, we commonly use the LS command to see the values of nine of those bits. These nine characters here. Whether the user can read, write, or execute. Whether the group can read, write, or execute. And whether others can read, write, or execute. In this example, the user can read and write. The group can read. They cannot do other things. So let's go back to our system and see some simple examples. We have three users here. The yellow, the red, and the green. We have three users logged in. And we're gonna operate on the first user's files. So they're all in the first user's directory. What can our red user do on this file? File one dot txt. What can the red user do with the file one dot txt? Why can they read it? Well, we need to look at the permissions on that file. These nine bits. These three bits tell us what the user owner can do. Who is the user owner? Listed here in the first column. These three bits tell us what the group owner can do. Who is the group in the second column? And these three bits tell us what others can do. What is our red user? User, group, or others with respect to file one. Our red user is a user owner, group owner, or others. How do you know others? Well, we need to actually check. We need to know who is in this group. So the groups, I think you'd guess that there's only one person in this group, but what we should do is check who is in this particular group, because a group can contain multiple users. So to determine what our red user can do, we need to know, well, they're not the user that owns the file, that's shown there. Are they in the group? If not, they are others. Well, what groups are we in? Well, no, we're not in this group, so you're correct. They are the other user with respect to that file. And the other user can only read the file. So we can see the contents of the file. Can we add something to the end? Echoes some extra text to the end of that file? Permission denied. Adding to the end is editing the file or writing the file. So we cannot write to the file as another user, but we can read the file. So what I tried to do is echo some text and this redirect appends to the file. So I tried to edit the file. It says no permission denied. Okay, this one's the simple cases. Let's change the group owner. How do we change a group owner? What groups are there? What groups are we in? Well, I've set it up so all of our users here are also in the students group. All right, they're in their own named group plus in the students, the common students group. So let's change the group of this file to be students. Change the group of file one.txt to be students. What can our red user do now? Can we add to the end? Yes, we can. We're now in the file is owned by the students group. Our red user is in the students group. Therefore they have the permissions of read and write on the file. So they can modify the file now. And when I did the echo to append to the file, it worked, it didn't say permission denied. And now they've added to the file. So this allows multiple users to edit the file. What about directories? Many of you have played with permissions in a lab or if not you'll play in the next homework and you'll set some permissions. So you'll quickly learn how the roles of read, write and execute work for user group and others. And they're not so hard once you know the syntax. You can change the permissions. We can change the ownership, change group. We can also change the mode of the file, file one, the access mode listed here. Let's clear and show that again. We can change the mode so that the group cannot write. Change the mode of the file so that the group cannot write. And now the write permission is removed and we're permission denied. So our red user who's in the students group can no longer write to the file because we removed the write permission for the students group. What about directories? Let's make a directory and let's go into that directory and make a file. So here we have a file in our directory, mystuff. I want it from the user's perspective to be secret. It's got my password in it. Let's try and control who can access the directory. Not the individual file because maybe I have some other files in here. Maybe I have another file. So I have multiple files in there. I don't want to set just the permissions for the files. Maybe I want to control who can access the directory. So let's see how permissions work on directories which are sometimes a little bit less obvious. So the mystuff directory is a directory because we see a D at the start, not a regular file. The user can read, write and execute. The group can read, write and execute. Others can read and execute. Our red user, what can they do with respect to the directory in mystuff? Our red user, and again, we've gone back to the individual group. So our red user is others with respect to this directory. What can they do? What can the red user do on the directory? They are others. Other permissions on the directory, read and execute. What does read mean? What does execute mean with respect to a directory? Well, let's see what we can do. Can we see the contents of the directory? Yes or no? All right, we can see the files in the directory. Can we change into the directory? Yes, we can and still do an LS, do an LS minus L. We can still see the files, can we read the files? Yes, the permissions on the files are still readable by others. So there's no control yet with respect to our red user on that directory. Let's change the permissions on the directory and see how they impact on the controls. Let's go back. Let's remove the read permissions on the mystuff directory. What's going to happen? So now our other user doesn't have the read permissions on the directory. What is a directory? A directory is a file that lists the files inside that directory. If we cannot read that special file, we cannot read the list of files inside that directory. So here it says permission denied. We cannot see what's inside that directory. So this is the impact of the R permission on a directory. Can we change into the directory? Yes, execute is the ability really to change into a directory, to access a directory. Can we do an LS? No. So we can change into the directory, but we can't see what's inside it. The read is what's inside it. The execute means whether we can access that. So that's a little bit different with respect to files. What about the secret? Can I see it? I don't know what files are there, but if I could guess the file, if I knew maybe there was a file. So even though I cannot list the files inside this directory, if I could guess the file name and that file was unprotected, that is it still had read permissions, I can still see the contents of that file. So this read permission on a directory just means you can't see the list of files in there. It doesn't mean you can't access those files or you can't CD into the directory. So it doesn't really provide security measure on that directory. If we could guess the file name, we can still see the contents of that file. Let's go back. Let's add the read permission back and remove the execute permission. So now the other can read the directory but not execute. What happens here? I try to list the contents of that file, of that directory. It actually shows me the two files in there. So I can see the contents of the directory. There are two files in there. I know their file names, but this LS returns some errors, because when you do LS, what LS does is shows me the contents of the directory and often also shows, tries to access the files in there, but it cannot access them. And that's clear when we try to CD. We cannot change into my stuff now. Execute on a directory means you can't change into that directory. What LS does, it not just lists the contents of the directory but tries to access that directory to see the files. So we know there's two files in there but I cannot CD into that directory. Can I see one of the files? I know the name. Is it gonna show me the password or not? Permission denied. Because what I need to do from an implementation perspective, I need to really CD into my stuff and then look at secret.txt. So I know that there's a file in there and actually we know that it's readable but because we don't have execute permissions on the directory, we cannot get into that directory to access the file. So this is the X permission on a directory. Right, it's a little bit more obvious. Let's change it back and also add the right permission on the directory. Sorry, what's the permissions of? So now others can read, write and execute that directory. So our red user can CD into there, LS and our other user can create files in this directory. So this is the right permission. Now others can write to this directory. So we can create a file. Note that that that new file created in this directory is owned by our red user. We will not show it, but the sticky bit, sorry, the set GID bit, where was it? In one of the special bits, the set UID bit for the user, files created in that directory, if we set that special permission, the file created would be given the directory user's name, not the user who created the file. So we can change who owns the files in someone else's directory. So that's a little bit about permissions with respect to directory. So I think if you haven't had practice with files, then you will in the homework. So it's best to practice. Last thing to demonstrate, we've got our three users. They're all in the students group. What if we want to have finer grain control and allow, say, a particular user to access to write to our file one? So sometimes we'd like to, even if we have many students in the group, we want to say just two or three people can write to a file. So currently in Linux, the way to do that is to create groups. But it gets quite complex if you want to have maybe not just a group of students, but a group of your friends to access a file. So there's an extra form of permissions which is used as an access control list that allows us to give finer grain permissions. And I'll just show an example of that. We need a different command. Currently, our two users cannot edit the file. We cannot edit the file. We cannot echo into the file and append to it. We don't have permissions to write to the file. There are some other commands. We can set the file access control list. So there's a separate access control list that we can add finer grain control. Set the file access control list. Modify it so that a user with a particular name can write to a file. Now, who can edit this file? Our red user still cannot. Our green user can. So this is finer grain permissions where we can set for a particular user what they can do, irrespective of groups and others. So this is a little bit more advanced. We will not see many examples of that, but it's much more powerful because what we do is we set a particular file access control list. We can see that to finish. This file, the user can read and write. The group can read. Others can read. The mask is used for default permissions. So if we create a new file, the mask is commonly used to set what are the initial permissions? And here what we did is we said this specific user can also write to the file. So this is something we can extend upon the normal permissions in Linux to allow control for individual users. And that's a much more powerful discretionary access control so we can give permissions to any particular user. So you'll have a homework task where I'll say here are some conditions or some users create some users, create some files. And here's the policy we want to implement. Here's our goals. You use these commands to implement those policies. That will give you practice with Linux permissions and access control.


Should the Ravens trade for a Colts wide receiver T.Y. Hilton? The Ravens are clearly missing that third tight end on offense because it could create so much more problems for defenses and give LeMau another trust and security blanket like he's used to. So could the Ravens actually make a move for Giants tight end Evan Ingram? Which players should the Ravens keep at all costs? Please and many many more questions on this episode of NFL Questions from Subscribers. YouTube team keeping clean, what's going on in the same Raven Hill with another video on another episode of NFL Questions from Subscribers. What Questions from Subscribers is the series where you can ask me any NFL question you want to based off of any NFL team and we answer it in a video just like this. Now if you want to be part of NFL Questions from Subscribers just send me an email at teamkeepitclean at gmail.com and we'll answer your question in a video just like this. If you send it to the incorrect email as great as your question may be it will not be used for questions from Subscribers so make sure you send it to the correct email.  The face mask and it doesn't have to be Ravens no matter what team you're fan of if you want to hold that face mask jets bangles steelers whatever even if you don't want football if you want black panther you're incredible Hulk you want dinosaurs you want hearts you whatever you want whatever design pattern you want you can hit her up and she'll take care of you her website is mysecretdwelling.com it is down below in the description it's mysecretdwelling.com so y'all hit her up and tell her that engraving vid sent you she'll take care of you I promise you and you will love what you get but anyway we got a lot of questions to get into I appreciate y'all for even sending them thank you for making this such a fun series man we have a lot of fun on here whole lot of fun with questions from subscribers shout out to everybody that was part of the live episode of NFL questions from subscribers that we did last night that was a whole lot of fun I appreciate all y'all coming through but let's go ahead and get into these questions and see what we got in store first question came from my boy Walter he said thanks for everything you do and hope all is well everything's really good I appreciate you Walter he said I've been watching stuff for a while and really enjoy it thank you I think we can all agree on that the Ravens haven't been the greatest at developing quarterbacks do you think that Lamar is having trouble reading defenses and that is a huge part of the problem it appears that the plays they are running are designed to give Lamar easy reads and he doesn't like to change the play at the line of scrimmage if he sees something different he reminds me a bit of the Joe Flacco days when he used to do this exact same thing all the greats can read defenses and change the play if they see something they don't like what are your thoughts hmm I you know what I don't I don't think that is is that he can't read defenses maybe some defense may give him fits but I think that a lot of it has to do with the predictable play called because if you look last evening even if you don't look at last year if you look at his rookie season something that Lamar always did a good job of and obviously it was through last year too was making pretty good decisions it's making good decisions and he did a really good job of taking care of the football passing wise we know he did definitely have those fumbles in that rookie year he only started what eight nine games and he led the league in fumbles but besides the fumbles decision-making it was pretty good now I know decision-making is not necessarily reading defenses so it can be a little bit of the same and it can also be a little bit different but I think that if you had like better play calling that could certainly help that out a lot because when you're predictable if your offense is predictable and nobody is really making any plays yeah I think it's a mix of things because one thing the offense is predictable to Lamar always be locked on a 15 and 89 so your anticipation for those anticipation routes it may be often need throwing to somebody else since you so used to only throwing a 15 and 89 or not only but primarily thrown to those guys he tries the other guys sometimes but mainly he looking for 1589 so that being fixated on those two I think that that definitely takes away because when you finally do try to get somebody else a chance it's just like it things are not on the same page and we've seen that throughout this season and then it could be a part where he may be struggling to read defenses I don't really think that's it but as far as that command having that command of changing the place he hasn't no I don't think they haven't really done that he'll move somebody around he might move a running back to the opposite side of something like that but we haven't really seen them calling audibles like that and if they have then maybe I missed it but I don't think we've really seen that so I think it could be a mix of things and maybe struggling to read defenses sometimes that could be a part of it but I think a bigger part is just the predictability of the offense and that defenses they can all see what's coming this question came from my boy Chris he said hey what's up engraving this is Chris from East Baltimore I got three questions for you what's up Chris he said how would you feel if the Ravens trader for T.Y. Hilton he's a guy no one is talking about that I could see being moved he's had a very quiet season in the Coastal winning without him being a contributor I could see the Coast giving him away for a third or fourth round pit three wide receiver set with Hollywood Duvne and Hilton provides us with a lot of speed in sure hands what are your thoughts I wouldn't mind that I wouldn't mind that T.Y. Hilton I think he's in the last year of his deal so if the Ravens did trade for him there could be that possible need for an extension when a time comes wouldn't be a guarantee anything but if you only gave up a third or fourth round pick for T.Y. Hilton you could have him for the obviously for the rest of this year at least and worst case scenario if you can't come up with a contract extension with him then you could possibly get a third round comp it form back in free agency if he hits free agency so I do not think that would be too much to give up for a rental especially a receiver especially a deep threat at receiver I T.Y. Hilton and yeah that would give us a guy I and that that would definitely take pressure off of Hollywood and that would definitely just open up the field a lot more it would open up the field a whole lot more so that I wouldn't mind that one he said also there are a few wide receivers no one talking about but may look more realistic as options for the Ravens and Julio Jones and Michael Thomas type guys he said Marvin Jones Golden Tate he's on the Giants I think Sterling Shepard also giant Kenny Steele's where is he on the Texans I think Will Fuller also Texans DD Westbrook DD Westbrook is on the Jaguars and Christian Kirk Christian Kirk from the Cardinals Christian Kirk he'd be a nice one because you big physical guy and we have that but at the same time we don't have that with Miles Boykin and just as maybe it's just a matter somebody made such a great great point yesterday they made such a great point in the live stream or well it wasn't a question that they sent but we talked about it on the last one was such a great point they said with Miles Boykin they feel like Miles Boykin may have just checked out and they say with Miles Boykin he possibly may have checked out because it just feels like he may just be like going through the motions barely even because he he's not getting any passes on his way like that he's not getting many opportunities so he may feel like you know what what's the point what's the point why am I gonna give my full effort every play why am I gonna really just try to be more crisp in my route running every play if the ball ain't even gonna come my way and I was thinking wow that that can be that's a big possibility because that can happen to people obviously on a football field it can happen to people at work some people at their normal jobs can feel like man if I'm ain't nobody gonna give me an opportunity what I'm gonna put in the full effort for for what's the point so that is a big possibility because I never thought of things like that before so but I mean we'll just have to see I know a lot of people be like oh well either football play he shouldn't be giving up and that's true and nobody should be giving up in anything that they do but it happens because it's real life so that was something that I was like wow that was a very good observation and he said last question I saw that Jeff Zerebik tweet that he said he could see the Ravens making a move for a player like Evan Ingram from the Giants I think if we can't find a wide receiver we like I wouldn't mind adding a playmaking pass catching tight end like Ingram he feels the hate and hurst roll for us and Lamar loves the tight ends I thought this would be a great move what are your thoughts thanks in great man love your content and keep grinding bro appreciated um Evan Ingram um I I just I don't think the Giants will give him up but anything is possible we've seen the Giants give up Odell Beckham Junior so again anything is pop and he was on he just signed a fresh extension so anything is possible but with Evan Ingram yeah he would be it would be having another athletic tight end that you could line up out wide and again like you say you know Lamar loves tight ends so he would see some passes come his way especially again being a tight end he can work the middle of the field he can even work the outside too he just he's a mismatch he is a mismatch he's a matchup nightmare because he has crazy speed good hands but the health has been a big problem with him that's been the biggest issue with Evan Ingram been a playmaker but he's always banged up so for that same 34th round pick that you're talking about for T.Y. Hilton if they were to go after Evan Ingram for something something similar I'll be cool with that first second no third or maybe but yeah so yeah I did say 34th but yeah so that 34th round pick and maybe the infamous EDC fifth rounder next question came from a boy maintained he said ESPN Graven is he said ESPN ESPN Graven is number one all Ravens and NFL sports coverage seeing keep it clean keep up the good work bro appreciate it man I would like to hear your assessment of the Ravens now and beyond this year my question is whether Ravens early success since Lamar Jackson took over his rookie year cause the organization to go too far with the Super Bowl a bus mindset instead of continuing to grow this core that's capable of being a dynasty or just really be successful for years no I think when you're successful and when you're competitive every year it should be Super Bowl a bus in my opinion I don't think you should be oh you know what let's just rebuild for the future let's wait for the future no I think you should go all in but go all in in a smart way but you should still go all in because and that's that's been the Ravens that they've been in when now mode since 2008 they've been in when now mode every year it's in 2015 was the exception because everybody got hurt but since 2008 they've been in when now mode and even it's crazy that it was looking like in 2018 in Lamar rookie season it was looking like we were thinking okay when now mode but with Joe Flacco under center it was it was looking a little rough and it was looking like okay maybe well maybe we're looking to the future then Lamar came in and took over we're back to in now mode again with his rookie quarterback and then so on and so forth so I just yeah that and they've been in when now more while still preparing for the future so it's it's a good combination of both it's just that balance I think and then he said I do you believe we are a team that might keep replacing players through the draft because of our success causing us to lose this current call for younger and younger players or do too much trading young Corb what hold up do you believe do you believe we are a team that might keep replacing players through draft because of our success causing us to lose this current core for younger and younger players or do too much trading young Corb and picks for vets to win now no again it's that balance it's that balance it's with with the Ravens they they are gonna keep replacing players through the draft because they have to you can't keep everybody you can't keep everybody but they can still continue to make some trades in it Ravens don't go crazy with trading that's something that they don't do they don't go crazy with trading they they'll make a couple trades here and there but they're not a team that's old this trade that trade that trade that trade that trade they do a good blend of everything free agency trades and obviously the draft too so again it's about that same balance you see I ask these questions because I feel like we are in a great position to be happy with our success regardless and be capable of being a playoff caliber team going all the way year in and out as we like to be to have many chances to win but may go all in or just let the key pieces walk thinking we always replace talent at some point you have to stick instead of the constant flip well I mean you see maulin Humphrey you see maulin Humphrey you see even even though I don't think he'll stick after this year you see what they did with Judah our Ronnie Stanley I will see what happens with that but so they they try to they try to keep their core they try to keep their core guys all at the same time while drafting guys as replacements as well so this is gonna continue to be the same thing he said I think I seen teams in all sports like the Orioles during the Machado era the Cubs since their championship KD Westbrook and Hardin Thunder era amongst teams off the top of my head we have seen this deconstruction of teams too early both ways either thinking all talent is replaceable within your system or trade young core talent for when now veterans and mortgage the future this Ravens team has about 10 to 15 players we should do anything to keep it all costs including some sign to extensions already see that's that right there you can't you can't do that that's how that's a lot you can't give out 10 to 15 big contracts all the time you can't you can't do that it's just it's pretty much in part especially in this day and age of salary cap because if you try to that's the thing if you try to keep everybody then that's gonna kill your cap if you try to keep everybody that's why you have to you got to pick a good amount of them that you feel are really worth it are really worth breaking the bank for in a really worth signing to contract extensions and roll with those in the other ones a it's sometimes some may take a short amount of time or a place I may take longer but that's what you got to do as a GM as a franchise because you can't you can't keep everybody and he said and they are mostly young and drafted by us but most importantly I think we need to let this team play out these years after all they are 12 quarterbacks in Super Bowl history or multiple rings so which direction would you go do you agree with these players to keep at all costs okay here we go so to keep it all costs said Lamar Jackson okay yeah Mark Andrews I'm still question-born that one but right now right now yeah that's that's that's Lamar's guy Hollywood Brown yeah as long as you get another receiver to pair alongside with him you got to get somebody else to JK Dobbins it's still early I mean he's these in his rookie years so I mean we ain't got to worry about that for what four years Gus Edwards all costs I don't think so and I don't think the Ravens are all in on Gus Edwards anyway Ronnie Stanley all costs no but I think they will obviously prefer to keep him since that's their left tackle Orlando Brown Jr. he said baby Zeus all costs I think they possibly could I think they may try to be slick and depending on what happens with Ronnie Stanley I can see them trying to sign Zeus to an extension while he's at right tackle and then they change his position to left tackle Bradley Boseman moving to center next year not all costs no it all just depends on how he is that's and I know I believe he played that in college I think Devin Duvenay all costs too early Marlon Humphrey all costs they already use to resign them Marcus Peters all costs what he signed he got think two years left on his deal so it's too early Chuck Clark all costs he's already resigned he got three years left on his deal to Sean Elliott all costs no not right now Patrick Queen all costs he's a rookie he got this year and four more years left Malik Harrison all costs no of course he got he's a rookie he got four years left on his deal so for some of these guys is too early but for some of them yeah they should definitely make sure they try to keep next question came from a boy Elijah he said hey how you doing man hope everything is going well and the family is healthy and all is good I appreciate it do you think Patrick Queen of the Ravens is one of the top backers in the league right now oh top backers in the league right now oh I ain't never think about that before is he uh wow is he one of the top backers in the league well he did play really good he played really good I never thought about that before though is he wanted to top linebackers in the league he's been all over he got to work on that pass coverage a bit he got to work on that pass coverage a bit but again he's he's been improving week by week um but yeah overall hmm maybe maybe he has yeah he's been doing pretty good and he's building up that he's stacking them games building up that consistency so that's been really good too so maybe he has next question came from my guy Jay he said hit me out in gravy and what if I told you there's another defensive diamond in the rough like Marcus Peters but he's a linebacker I know we need pass rushes but hit me out I think we should just trade for Deon Jones as Atlanta Falcons might be rebuilding so we might get him for the low because of Atlanta's bad defense and not give as much as we would for Julio Jones I think him LJ Ford and Patrick Queen would be the best linebacker trio in the league Patrick Queen is a monster as he is a great blitzer and creates turnovers effortlessly like a Deon Jones who is still one of the fastest linebackers in the league he can mentor Patrick Queen as he has been in the Super Bowl so he will be a great leader for young players he's great at tackling quick to the ball in a low-key ballhawk he will also add more speed that his team so desperately needs I think other than PQ this front seven doesn't have enough speed well that's true every great defense begins with a speedy front seven look at Jacksonville two years ago oh boy they were beautiful as I think this will this will improve our past rushes because Martin there will have the best starting secondary in Peters Humphrey Clark and a Joker also the best backup corner in the league Jimmy Smith a new elite linebacker in Deon Jones a monster and Patrick Queen in a smart-minded LJ Ford a behind-the-four man a four made up of Campbell Williams Ferguson and Bowser that's nasty as I think McPhee and Jude on our two slow to create a consistent pass rush and this makes Martin they'll have the ability to change it up and adjust what do you think about part one Deon Jones yeah that would definitely bring another element of speed to this front seven because yes Deon Jones does have that good speed and they could send him on blitzes they would have somebody else to blitz he maybe he could help Malik Harrison out a bit how good is Deon Jones in coverage I'm not sure but he does bring again that element of speed quickness fastness and I think they should actually say Malik Harrison and on blitzes a bit more see what he can do I'd help out that pass rush but let's see with Deon Jones though yeah I know Atlanta they could soon be having a fire sale so we'll see how they feel about everything and he said part two I know this one is gonna make some people mad but what about AJ Green ain't gonna make nobody mad cuz a lot of people actually been asking about AJ Green I said I know people are probably saying something about his injury but hear me out I think we should trade Jude on and Justice Hill for him as it's not that big of a risk as he is a one-year contract like Jude on and they get a stud in Justice Hill and he is a hybrid runner and a catcher running back that we are not not using and they are getting a healthy pass rusher and end off things good with AJ as him and burrow are not working out for AJ Green this will finally give him a winning environment and a chance to get healthy as we are run heavy offense and won't rely on him too much but he can also be Lamar's blanket for first downs and touchdowns as he gets healthier and a decoy as his name alone commands double teams which means one-on-one for Hollywood Andrews and DuVernay now if the Ravens get back to running the football like last year and feed the hot hand Lamar this offense will be 20 times better than last years as I feel like there will always be an open man in the offensive line will get better as we run more like last years I don't know why but ever since the Titans Lamar and the coaches forgot their identity Lamar needs to play like you always say his game and go back to being the number one playing football the coaches just need to stick to their game plan and run the ball to feed the hot hand like last year what do you think much love to teamkeeper cleaning you and your family a appreciate that J with Lamar Jackson I think a big part of it some people have had a lot of different suggestions as to why they not playing that game some people think he may still be hurt some people think oh the coaches just really want to get him into a rhythm passing the ball and both could be true both could be something else but one thing that somebody said was that maybe the coaches maybe they really trying to get the Ravens in a position to where they have to pass the ball and they can sort of simulate being down by 14 being down by multiple scores being down where they need to throw themselves back in the game so maybe that's why they're playing this different style they're trying this different style out on some of these lesser opponents so just period actually just period because they sure did it in the Chiefs game and Chiefs surely ain't no lesser opponent but they've been doing that this year they've been doing that this year some people think oh maybe they just passing heavy right now and then once the playoffs roll around they gonna get back to themselves and try to catch a lot of people off guard so I mean we'll see we won't know what theory is true until we actually continue to go throughout the season and hopefully they make it to the playoffs and then we'll see what happens then because that's really gonna tell the story but AJ Green I do like how you broke that down I love how you broke that down because that is yeah that's exactly what he could do if he's battling an injury yeah he wouldn't be relied upon too often I mean he ain't relied upon too often right now with the Bengals but yeah that could be a move that I don't think it's likely with the end that's a big indivision in the indivision trade right there AJ Green who has been the best Bengals receiver for a while minus last year but he's the best Bengals receiver for a while just as broken so many records for them obviously with Andy Dalton they had that connection he's been the Ravens killer for a while now to AJ Green going from the Bengals to the Ravens think again I think it's like I think he's what he making like 18 mil I think receivers franchise tag is 18 mil something like that but then for him to go for the Ravens I mean from the Bengals to the Ravens and but then a big trade like Jude on from the Ravens to the Bengals that's those are big trades big trades so that would mean Tyus Bowser his role would increase and he would have to be the guy I do think he is our best pass rusher right now and then who else would be behind Bowser now as that outside linebacker that yeah they they pass rush but they also may be required to drop back sometimes who else is gonna be that guy so Ravens would lose some depth and then you lose Justice Hill who's been primarily just a special teamer not even a returner but just a special teamer so you would lose Justice Hill but yeah like you said they aren't using him anyway and Bengals would gain that so they I'm sure they will find a way to use him and then Matt Jude on he will be with Carlos Dunlap and Gino Atkins and I think you can certainly help them out a bit that would be a very interesting trade and if it happened and like you said both guys are they not on long term deals both guys are in the last year of their deal they are they both franchise tag so next year they'll both be free agents you cannot negotiate an extension with either the two and would either the two even really be extended what's AJ Green gonna do he said he wants to stay though he said he wants to stay he said he don't want to go nowhere I don't know actions can speak louder than words but he said you don't want to go nowhere so maybe he doesn't want to go anywhere so bingles were probably denied that next question came from a boy Savick's 10 he said what's going on in Graven hope you're doing well during these tough times appreciate it first question with everything going on in New Orleans would you give away a first and a fourth for Michael Thomas a first and a fourth a first and a fourth yeah I probably would to give an established wide receipt yeah I probably would and last question God forbid he said if the mall would go down would you rather one RG three or Trace mix only besides all the memes honestly I like mix mix only a lot um for me uh I would I don't know I don't know cuz trace mix totally would be like a um he would maybe able to throw some defenses off a bit because with trace mix solely there would be a lot of unknown because defenses they don't know nothing about trace mix only they ain't seen him in an FL yet they seen him in preseason a couple years ago but that's it RG three they haven't seen him in a while but they have definitely seen him and with RG three he got that experience I think I would actually feel comfortable comfortable with RG three but with trace I mean him being there it's like hey what's the worst that could happen well it could go really bad it could go really bad either way and I know a lot of people really don't like RG three for numerous reasons but I mean yeah I would yeah I would probably be more comfortable with uh with RG three as the the veteran guy and I saying that a young guy can't do it cuz I mean obviously us we saw it a couple years ago and Flacco went down and Lamar came in and took over but I would probably be more comfortable with RG three I'm just him having all that experience and all the different types of game situations so I'd probably be more comfortable with him next question came from a boy kawaii 12 he said hey hope you and the fam doing good from Illinois they best fans here but I like the Ravens and do you think the Ravens could try to make a move for someone like Calvin really or not as good Stefan digs no no no Stefan digs ain't he just got traded from the vikings and he's doing great with the bills and they what 4-1 oh Stefan digs ain't going no way and he said because I think Lamar could be good with the great route runner but the builds want to keep him love the content yeah he could be just somebody that can get over and Calvin really that would be a good one because that would be much less of a cap hit in Atlanta they in some cap trouble right now they're gonna be in some cap trouble next year for sure so Calvin really he wouldn't alleviate much cap cuz he's still on his rookie deal so that'd be good for the Ravens and a tiny bit good for Atlanta dude but I feel like Atlanta would um they could they could but yeah like I said he's on his rookie deal and that would be he'd be cheap enough for the Ravens and I'll get him a really good receiver to that boy that dude can run some routes man he got some good hands man he got some good hands and he's establishing himself as a respected receiver in the league so Calvin really that would be a good one the next question came from a boy Cleveland CBI he said it's 2040 what about Antonio Brown and he I think he sent this last night during the live stream because a lot of people's questions that hey they say hey what about Antonio Brown what about AB sign AB but this guy me next question came from a boy Joe he said yo engraving I hope all as well with you in the fam during this crazy time also thanks for referring the mask from your aunt I ordered and it's awesome very comfy if I've got to wear a mask plus it's pretty awesome to wear it here in Seahawks nation where I can never find any Ravens gear hey that's real cool Joe I appreciate that man thank you he said anyway just a thought that I had for this season after watching our run game or I guess like there of what if we ran Gustav Busse's our lead back to start the first half of the game to wear down in opposing teams defense I wish they would do that with him being such a powerhouse and almost has positive yards game seems like a no-brainer yeah it does then depending on the team we're playing run either Mark or JK in the second half maybe work on getting in some throwing plays in for Lamar and the Y receiver call wants to defense is wore down either way this run game is looking really pitiful I would just love to see why we chose to keep for running backs just as I'm sure most of team keep it clean is either way for one ain't bad so we got something to smile about it's true it's true thanks for taking the time to read and answer my question blesses to you and yours and just like the Ravens running game so far this year I'm out I like that one man but yeah it's yeah I agree I agree I feel like Gus should definitely be the lead back and they could get a thing where they maybe rely heavily on two backs in the game somebody suggested that last week or early this week in question from subscribers what if John Hubbell made Greg Roman just choose two running backs again for those to be the focal point not to say that the third one would be inactive but they were just mainly mainly use those two so and I think that could really help somebody get into a rhythm a lot more give them a lot more opportunities to break for a big one or just to get that consistent yardage man so they they they get into the rhythm they their bodies comfortable and whatnot and they just they got their feet under so I think it would I think it'll work out if they did something like that so that's a good suggestion next question came from a guy slide boogie he said in Raven first-time visitor love the veers just want to comment on most subscribers and saying Ravens don't have enough weapons I beg to differ we have them Lamar and coaching is just not making teams pay if you watch film meticulously you'll see that Lamar doesn't make the reads when available receivers and backs are free and clean it's frustrating tell me what you think peace and blessings hey and that's something that we talked about before too with Lamar again 15 and 89 Hollywood and Andrews and that's it Hollywood and Andrews we if they're not gonna make a move for anybody even if they did make a move for somebody regardless they for now that you got to roll what you got and try to really make the most of what you do currently have right now DuVernay put them out there more with Boykin I've got to try to they got to try to grow that trust they got a trope because right now it's baby trust between Lamar and Miles Boykin is baby trust it ain't even it ain't teenager trust it ain't adult trust it ain't no big trust it's baby trust so they got to build that up big time because Boykin could be he could be something man and they just got to build each other's confidence in each other up man they have to because this what's going on right now nah man this this ain't it man this ain't it so yeah Lamar got to do a better job spreading the ball around and really just seeing everybody and looking for everybody that's the thing because he may see everybody but he don't look for everybody so we got to improve on that question came from a boy Uncle Ray Ray he said what's up team keep it clean noose up here been watching for a while but served about two to three months ago sorry for the weight so good he said straight to the question with Bell being cut and a be still on the market should the Ravens make a bold statement by signing both of them well we knew what this question came before and I mean with I never thought they should sign leave me on bail I know that we heard the rumors that there was interest but never thought they should sign leave me on bail so we'll be the point you already got four running backs now you don't use an array what you're gonna add a fifth for even if you take away one of them running backs and a bill it'd be no point in his style would not work behind the Ravens offensive line at all now a be that one I wouldn't mind that one but it's a shout out to my god Cleveland BC or CBI sorry he said we can cut Ingram and make room for a be a move like this would be saying we want to win I know it's a long shot but what do you think and he said hashtag Ravens Nation and hashtag pay back now they ain't cutting Ingram man cuz Ingram for them Ingram is more than just a running back he just provides good energy and good chemistry and a veteran presence on an experience on the team so Ingram he now he's not going anywhere not at least not this season that I just nah yeah that ain't that definitely happening cuz I just I mean you never know but not for this for Mark Ingram you know marking like they they not getting rid of no Mark Ingram cuz it ain't like he's something crazy expensive back anything like that he makes five million a year and while you haven't been getting the best production out of the run game Mark Ingram leaving next question came from a boy Rodeo shout out to my guy man he said what's up bro hope you in the fama good just curious one I love Stanley as I said before but I'm also in my I also am a firm believer of not letting him go for nothing I think Eric the cost is the same way and like y'all said I know on here with Stanley I know they I believe they would prefer to keep Stanley but at the same time if they can't come to no agreement with them yeah I think they were franchise tag them and trade them because they would definitely get at least a first round pick but a first round and change maybe even two first round but they would definitely get something great for Stanley for sure with no questions asked anyway he said while I want to keep him I know there's a chance he could walk with that said I know interdivision trades are beyond rare however if we did trade with the Steelers last year now hypothetically could we ship Stanley to Cindy oh to since he for John Ross and AJ Green oh oh two for one oh no I would not want that it oh no uh-uh I would not want that it for John Ross and AJ Green I think that I think that the Bengals would do that in a heartbeat like I know AJ Green said he want to stay but for them to get a top left tackle and trade a receiver that they don't like and John Ross who was a first round pick but been way under performing and then AJ Green who's on definitely on the way back into his career but I this would be a really bad trade for the Ravens but he said two for one lol that is a type of two for one I would love our front office to make an offensive double dip I know it's unlikely but it would be a very interesting trade and he said PS is a week six so no man I don't like that one oh no no not saying that John Ross couldn't possibly work out give us a deep thread but not not an underwhelming receiver for in super super veteran banged up all the time and now man I do like the idea of a two for one but these two I don't like that one but anyway my boy Rodeo had another question about leadership he said let's just get straight to it we all know it we want and need help it why receive it but is the problem simply leadership and experience when Lamar came in he had Flacco and even RG3 two experienced quarterbacks that between both been in every situation you can be in in the football game true but Mark came in he had already been in the league and was a voice leader on the Saints is true he been in several big games and it's clear his leadership plays a big role in why Gus is so successful when he's in and the same thing goes for rookie J.K. Dobbins even when Mark Andrews coming in he had max Williams and Nick Boyle these wide receivers have no one Willie Snead can give suggestions but no disrespect his game doesn't align with anyone's same thing for Chris Moore I just feel our coaches could never develop wide receivers and it seems that problem still exists who's to say that if we signed as Bryant no matter what he did or didn't do on the field these young guys can't learn from him to me Miles Boykin simply don't know how to use his big body get him a vet that can show him and mold them cuz our coaches can't while I'm still rooting for AB bring him in to help mold our speeds to Hollywood and Duvenay cuz our coaches can't show them how to be the double team or how to keep the play alive while Lamar scrambling despite us wanting a wide receiver for help on the field to better our own wide receiver group I think adding a wide receiver general in general with experience is the key for all these young guys so that would be that would be huge on coaching and we know that the Ravens have not been the best team at developing wide receivers that has not been this strong suit so I guess from my guy Rodel saying maybe they should take a different approach and actually just bring in a receiver that's done that been there done that and been through the league and had a lot of success in the league to help develop their wide receivers and possibly that receiver could contribute as well so we know AB could do that there's got the good experience he would be great for miles Boykin just to because we know obviously they wouldn't sign if they signed theirs that they brought a minute wouldn't be no long-term thing so Boykin would not need to be in fear for his job even though I think depending on how the season goes the rest of it he could be in fear for his job I think Willie Snead as well because I can see Devin Duvenay taking over Willie Snead's position I think that's actually gonna happen next year I don't think they're gonna resign Willie Snead at all and with Boykin by the way it's going so far he could be out but we just gotta wait and see but yeah that that does is speaks volumes to the culture man speaks volumes because we have seen we have continued to wait for years and years and years to where the receivers they get to develop and now they're getting an opportunity the young wide receivers are getting an opportunity they are keeping the young guys letting them they rolling with them and it's been a gift and a curse all at the same time because with you only see one guy performing one young guy performing and it's been a big frustration so hopefully something can change whether this other guys getting involved in them performing or them just bringing somebody that is guaranteed to get involved so we just we just waiting it out and hoping for the best and the last question this is actually a rant from my guy e-nonic it's the last one for question from subscribers and he said long rant in Mars we trust hey engraving hope you and the family are doing well this with this new norm and he said rant I've been pretty disappointed with our lack of a diverse passing offense this season I keep hearing the term trust mentioned all the time true we sure say it on here a lot what trust is Lamar asking miles will he do when they approach a tour he said what trust is Lamar asking miles or will you do when they approach a tour walk his mom home from work or to take care of his place when he's out of town or is it that he doesn't trust his passing ability at this point past completions to a wide receiver an open wide receiver should be the norm it's like he's regressed Flacco had his favorite his favorites but he was not this bad Joe generally threw to anyone open not just Bolton Steve Smith senior Tory Pitta or heap etc it's like Lamar just refuses to let it fly if you think back to the last two pre-season's Boykin and Scott now a jet had the most productive had the most productive outings numbers of targets touchdowns and plays with Trace McSawley and RG3 that's true I remember the back shoulder throws the high point passes to the end zone etc I was thinking okay we got some new weapons now then I remember the Greg Roman Ravens this offense is where wide receiver dreams go to die lol and that's been pretty much most received pretty much most receivers that go to the Ravens me that that's that's how it's been for a long time for most of them for about like 90% of them a it's a select few that make it out but usually here that's how it is that's why a lot of Ravens fans a lot of our expectations can be low when it comes to the production and the quality of a wide receiver but anyway he said I know trust in chemistry are real thing but everyone knows from Pop Warner to the pros if you keep refusing to engage a player in the game of my alarm hold on all right but that's true that's what we just talking about he said no trust in chemistry are real thing but everyone knows from Pop Warner to the RPOs I mean to the pros to the pros if you keep refusing to engage a player in the game eventually he will mentally check out and why wouldn't he see we were just talking about that we're just talking about that earlier anyway he said you see me in practice and hit me there but come game time I become invisible you see the comment boy can it's just there doing cardio yes I have seen people saying that over and over after the game since he defended basically said all we have to do is cover Mark Andrews and Mark Keeson that's it that statement just proved my point yes and we all agree we should be spreading the ball around putting our wide receivers and tight ends in a position to get the yards after the catch and not just running down the field to block for two of the QBs boys that's true man question so what do you think is the real issue Lamar doesn't trust his passability or wide receivers forget what they did in college sorry for the ramp but I'm 100% confident every wide receiver we have would be more productive and effective with any other team that's true we are wasting talent keep with the great work really appreciate your commitment to the channel and the willingness to keep the flock informed hmm I think as far as what the real issue is um in this year Lamar got to do a better job of spreading that ball around for sure he got to do a better job of spreading the ball around because again like like you said like Jesse Bates said I mean like we've been saying too like it's no secret Jesse Bates from the Bengals when he said that about oh you just got to watch 1589 it was no he didn't drop no bomb he didn't drop oh man Jesse Bates oh wow we didn't know no we all knew that we all knew that like even last year we would talk about a lot say hey the main people getting involved in the game are the Mars be Lamar Jackson Mark Ingram Mark Andrews and Marquis Brown that's it everybody else will get a little sprinkle here and there but consists of those were the guys those were always the guys so with those always being the guys teams focusing on that and other guys they just out there and that's what we're talking about earlier people can mentally check out of stuff if they not getting involved if they putting in the work especially like you said like how you said it because you talked about how somebody could possibly put it be putting in the work doing practice and be getting passes and then practice and stuff okay yeah let's get it within game come game time it's nothing it's nothing and like you said they did a lot of the high point balls to Jalil Scott and Miles Boykin in the preseason's and stuff and it was like okay hey this could be it baby this could be it but we see none of that in the regular season from Lamar and I think with Lamar he likes a lot he doesn't like a lot of 50-50 stuff he doesn't throw a lot of 50-50 throws a lot of safe passes he throws a lot of safe passes and to you got to get your receivers a chance man you got to spread the ball around you want this offense to really get going and even if they just even if they do do this continue to do this passing heavy offense okay if you're gonna do that okay it is what it is we were rather more running be involved but okay if you're gonna run this heavy passing offense go to the other guys too they got to go to the other guys it cannot just be the same old stuff man and that's what it's been is continues to be the same old stuff they can't do that man they got to get out of that Lamar got to get out of that they got it they got to get out of that man so I just I don't even think it's that the wire see was forget what they did in college anything like that but like you said if a lot of these white riders he's went somewhere else they would have more success they will have more looks thrown their way the more passes thrown their way and more looks but Lamar again he's fixated on Hollywood and Andrews and it could be that maybe him and Boykin did they just have bad experiences man they have bad experiences and Lamar just like I just I can't I can't but now right now you have to you have to that's what you got and you got to use what you got because it's almost like I don't I don't and who knows if coaching is really thinking like this but they could possibly be maybe coaching the GM the front office they could be thinking like why would we go out and get another wire receiver while we go out and really get a weapon at where is it like a true number one guy if we not even so we don't even know what our own guys got we don't even know their capabilities yet I hope then I think like that but they could and it will be realistic because they could be like man if we gotta go out and get somebody else is he gonna look their way are they gonna build a chemistry I think they will he would be forced to so I don't I don't even I don't think it's that Lamar's regressed I just think it's that he just really got to work on getting those other guys the ball too and it could be that sometimes they just not getting open because I know the Ravens are at the day at the bottom of it's a mix of things there's no one thing that it is I know the Ravens receivers are like so close to I think they like the bottom four in the league when it comes to separation so that's a big yikes that's a really big yikes so that's why I say hey that's what James Proshay was known for right making them contested catchers throw them in there Devon Doofen they got some speed right that's what he's known for throw them in there it could really open up this game man out that's how I say just try it it couldn't hurt it couldn't be worse than what it is now try it try to use some different guys that you've got you've been trying with Boykin you've been trying with Snead it's been they've been quiet for both of them early on this year but throwing Duvenay throwing Proshay not saying that they both even got to be started but throw them in a lot more and just see what happens see if the dynamic the quarterback to wide receiver dynamic changes and if he gets those guys involved a lot more I would just I would love to see that scenario in that situation see it play out


IN THE MORNING OF LIFE by Thomas Moore Red for LibraVox.org by David Laundra In the morning of life, when its cares are unknown, and its pleasures and all their new luster begin, when we live in a bright beaming world of our own, and the light that surrounds us is all from within, though it is not, believe me, in that happy time we can love as in hours of less transport we may.  But affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by, like a leaf on the stream that will never return, when our cup which had sparkled with pleasures so high, first tastes of the other, the dark flowing urn, then, then is the time when affection holds sway with a depth and a tenderness joy never new. Love nursed among pleasures is faithless as they. But the love born of sorrow, like sorrow, is true.  So it is not mid-splendor, prosperity, mirth, that the depth of love's generous spirit appears. To the sunshine of smiles it may first owe its birth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears. In the morning of life, when its cares are unknown, and its pleasures in all their new luster begin, when we live in a bright beaming world of our own, and the light that surrounds us is all from within. O, tis not, believe me, in that happy time we can love, as in hours of less transport we may. Of our smiles, of our hopes, tis the gay, sunny prime, but affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by, like a leaf on the stream that will never return, when our cup, which is sparkled with pleasure so high, first tastes of the other the dark flowing urn. Then, then is the time when affection holds sway with a depth and a tenderness joy never knew. Love, nursed among pleasures, is faithless as they, but the love born of sorrow, like sorrow is true.  So it is not mid-splendor, prosperity, mirth, that the depth of love's generous spirit appears. To the sunshine of smiles it may first owe its birth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears. In the morning of life, by Thomas More, read for LibriVox.org by Ernst Batinama, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. In the morning of life, when its cares are unknown, and its pleasures and all their new lust begin, when we live in a bright beaming world of our own, and the light that surrounds us is all from within. It is not, believe me, in that happy time we can love, as in hours of less transport we may. Of our smiles, of our hopes, tis the gay sunny prime, but affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by like a leaf on the stream that will never return. When our cup, which had sparkled with pleasure so high, first tastes of the other, the dark flowing urn, then, then is the time when affection holds sway, with a depth and a tenderness, joy never new. Love nursed among pleasures as faithless as they, but the love born of sorrow, like sorrow, is true. In climes full of sunshine, though splendid the flowers, their sighs have no freshness, their odour no worth, this cloud in the mist of our own isle of showers that call the rich spirit of frequency forth. So it is not mid-splendour, prosperity mirth, that a depth of love's generous spirit appears. To the sunshine of smiles it may first owe its birth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears, end of poem. This recording is in the public domain. In the Morning of Life by Thomas Moore, read for LibriVox.org by Jan McGillivray. In the Morning of Life, when its cares are unknown, and its pleasures in all their new luster begin, when we live in a bright beaming world of our own, and the light that surrounds us is all from within, O'tis not, believe me, in that happy time we can love as in hours of less transport we may. Of our smiles, of our hopes, tis the gay, sunny prime, but affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by, like a leaf on the stream that will never return, when our cup, which had sparkled with pleasure so high, first tastes of the other, the dark-flowing urn, then, then is the time when affection holds sway with a depth and a tenderness joy never new. Love nursed among pleasures is faithless as they, but the love born of sorrow, like sorrow, is true. In climbs full of sunshine, though splendid the flowers, their sighs have no freshness, their odor no worth, tis the cloud and the mist of our own isle of showers that recall the rich spirit of fragrancy forth. So it is not mid-splendor prosperity, mirth, that the depth of love's generous spirit appears. To the sunshine of smiles it may first owe its birth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears. End of poem. This recording is in the public domain. In the Morning of Life by Thomas Moore, read for LibriVox.org by Kristen Hughes. In the morning of life when its cares are unknown and its pleasures in all their new lusts to begin, when we live in a bright, beaming world of our own and the light that surrounds us is all from within. Oh, tis not, believe me, in that happy time we can love as in hours of less transport we may. Of our smiles, of our hopes, tis the gay, sunny prime, but affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by, like a leaf on the stream that will never return, when our cup, which had sparkled with pleasure so high, first tastes of the other, the dark flowing urn, then, then is the time when affection holds sway, with a depth and a tenderness joy never new, love nursed among pleasures is faithless as they, but the love born of sorrow, like sorrow, is true. When climbs full of sunshine, though splendid the flowers, their sighs have no freshness, their odor no worth, tis the cloud and the mist of our own isle of showers that call the rich spirit of pregnancy forth. So it is not mid-splendor, prosperity mirth, that the depth of love's generous spirit appears, to the sunshine of smiles it may first owe its birth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears. In the Morning of Life by Thomas Moore Read for LibriVox.org by Mark Smith of Simpsonville, South Carolina In the morning of life when its cares are unknown and its pleasures in all their new luster begin, when we live in a bright beaming world of our own and the light that surround us is all from within, oh, tis not, believe me, in that happy time we can love, as in hours of less transport we may, of our smiles, of our hopes, tis the gay, sunny prime, but affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by, like a leaf on the stream that will never return, when our cup, which had sparkled with pleasure so high, first taste of the other, the dark-flowing urn, then, then is the time when affection holds sway with a depth and a tenderness joy never knew, love, nursed among pleasures, is faithless as they, but the love born of sorrow, like sorrow, is true. When climes full of sunshine, though splendid the flowers, their sighs have no freshness, their odor no worth, tis the cloud and the mist of our own isle of showers that call the rich spirit of frequency forth, so it is not mid-splendor, prosperity, mirth, that the depth of love's generous spirit appears, to the sunshine of smiles it may first stow its berth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears. In the morning of life by Thomas More, read Philip Vox.org by Raven Notation. In the morning of life, when its cares are unknown, and its pleasures in all their new lustre begin, when we live in a bright beaming world of our own, and the life that surrounds us is all from within, though it is not, believe me, in that happy time, we can love as in hours of less transport we may, of our smiles, of our hopes, tis the gay, sunny prime, but affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by, like a leaf on the stream that will never return, when our cup, which had sparkled with pleasure so high, first tastes of the other, the dark flowing urn, then, then is the time when affection holds sway with a depth and the tenderness joy never knew, love, nursed among pleasures, is faithless as they, but the love born of sorrow, like sorrow, is true. The climes full of sunshine, though splendid the flowers, their sighs have no freshness, their odor no worth, tis the cloud and the mist of our own isle of showers, that call the rich spirit a frequency forth, so it is not midsblender, prosperity, mirth, that the depth of love's generous spirit appears, to the sunshine of smiles it may first owe its birth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears. End of poem. This recording is in the Public Domain. In the Morning of Life by Thomas Moore. Read for LibreVox.org by Ted Doolittle. In the morning of life, when its cares are unknown and its pleasures and all their new luster begin, when we live in a bright beaming world of our own and the light that surrounds us is all from within, hote is not, believe me, in that happy time we can love, as in hours of less transport we may, of our smiles, of our hopes, tis the gay, sunny prime, but affection is truest when these fade away. When we see the first glory of youth pass us by, like a leaf on the stream that will never return, when our cup, which had sparkled with pleasure so high, first tastes of the other, the dark flowing urn, then, then is the time when affection holds sway with a depth and a tenderness joy never new. Love, nursed among pleasures, is faithless as they, but the love born of sorrow, like sorrow, is true. In climbs full of sunshine, though splendid the flowers, their sighs have no freshness, their odor no worth, tis the cloud and the mist of our own isle of showers that call the rich spirit of fragrance he forth, though it is not mid splendor, prosperity, mirth, that the depth of love's generous spirit appears, to the sunshine of smiles it may first owe its birth, but the soul of its sweetness is drawn out by tears.


has been waiting patiently and maybe you could reflect about the role of finance in the governance of cities, especially of Mumbai. Thank you, Mr. Richard Burdett, Dery Dimont and Honourable Chief Minister of Delhi, Shiladik Siddhi and friends. I have been hearing the issues pertaining to all the major cities around the globe, mainly Sao Paulo, Washington and Bogota. Mumbai is a different city. This house is about 12 million population, 59% of which lives in slums. I was in Sao Paulo about a month ago and I thought that we are better off. But then number which I heard is only 10% population is living in slums in Sao Paulo. But here it is 59%, daily migration from the mainland to the city of Mumbai is almost 3000 people a day. And still it's growing. Everyone in this country thinks that if he comes in the city of Mumbai, he can be better off. In short, if I have to describe this city, I can say this is the city where poorest of poor lives and this is the city you can see the world's richest person walking in this part of the town. This is a city which houses many leopards covering about 103 square kilometers of forest and this is the city engulfed and covered in the neighborhood by many acres of mangroves. The growth which city has seen in recent past, we have a very serious problems and fortunately every citizen of the city has started thinking about protection of environment, has started thinking about the proliferation of slums. We have time and again come out with new policies to accommodate the slum dwellers. The so-called dairy demand's inclusive growth is not his inclusive growth. The entire planning commission and Prime Minister has accepted that the country will grow with inclusive growth. I must bring to your notice that it's not the issue only for Mumbai as Minister of Finance and Planning of the state of Maharashtra. I face this issue in most of the towns of this state. Push and pull factor is something which we need to think about. If you keep thinking about the city itself, city only and creating more and more infrastructure as it demands, there is no end to it. But a push and pull factor that the people living in the rural Maharashtra or rural India, the living conditions in those areas pushed a person to urban area, I would say, and the attraction which these urban areas are having, that is the pull factor according to me. So the migration to the cities in this state of Maharashtra is almost now 43% population lives in cities in the state of Maharashtra. But fortunately, the state has done well in most of the other cities except Mumbai. Nagpur, Pune and Nasik, these are the major cities which are worth living. In first ten cities, we have three cities of Maharashtra. But as far as the proliferation of slums are concerned, we need to innovate, come out with new policies. The state is almost ready with the new policy which is declared and is being discussed in the house very thoroughly. The city has offered free of cost houses to the slum dwellers. Honorable Chief Minister of Delhi has described what the policy is in Delhi. The policies in most of the cities and the policy in this city is quite different, I believe. We have offered free housing. 225 square feet house is offered to the slum dweller and the rest of the area is offered for sale which makes good for the expenditure of making the tower for the slum dwellers. The rate at which we have done this is about slum rehabilitation authority has housed about 80,000 people in so far and it will have housed about 150,000 families in the new houses by end of next year. Yes, we have another very important challenge is improvement quality of life of the residents of the city. We have slum dweller, slums in most of the pockets but at the same time we have another issue, the dilapidated structures in the town. In the old city of Mumbai which is the island city, we have old structures maybe older, as old as 80 and 100 years old and the state has developed a policy which will allow those dilapidated structures also to be reconstructed. A new policy also has thought of cluster approach which will allow the area, total area development instead of individual building development. Another important aspect is urban mobility and deteriorating public transport. This is the biggest challenge city of Mumbai faces. We have taken two major projects, one is Mumbai urban transport plan which allows people to commute the people. Lacks of people are commuting between north and south as the south area is a center of business and the north is most of the residential area. But the city has deliberately, 20 years ago has developed another business area in the center of the town which has over the period reduced the traffic but still the effect is same because the growth of this city is so fast that creation of bandra kurla complex has not effectively given advantage to the city's commuter. So city has come out with the new transportation plan, new projects are coming up with the help of JNURM, the union government is very keen and has given special priority for city of Mumbai for its development. This has never happened in last four decades but this time the prime minister has specifically mentioned that city of Mumbai should be helped thoroughly and we are getting a lot of benefits from union government too. But as far as the transport plan is concerned, I personally feel the technology also needs to help these issues. The Mumbai is not only in the located, only in the city of Mumbai. When we talk of Mumbai as far as the state is concerned, we speak about Mumbai metropolitan region which covers vast area, it covers about 60 to 70 kilometers north and south of the city of center of the city right up to Alibagh in south and right up to Kalyan, Dumbuli and Vasai Virar other areas. The point I would like to make here is the commuter is the basic, the basic challenge is to create a better transport system. The state and union and the city of Mumbai has spent thousands and thousands of crores in creation of new infrastructure. The flyover above next flyover, above next, above earlier flyover is not the only solution, that's what I feel and so the city has gone now, gone into a new concept of Mumbai trans-harbour link and we all, two minutes, three minutes, one minute, then I stop here. Yeah, okay, okay. The city has gone in for Mumbai trans-harbour link which will open up the mainland area and I think it will resolve few problems of city which is facing as far as the infrastructure is concerned. I need not take your time on e-governance and other areas but I must mention that city has learnt some lessons from infrastructure project. When I mentioned Mumbai trans-harbour link which has not yet come but is approved by environment and other authorities but at the same time we have learnt a lesson by when we went into the construction of Bandra verly ceiling which will again open up a new area for the transportation plan. But unfortunately this project got stuck and we have learnt that once you, a lot of project, it's a management side but when you, a lot of project you need not change its alignment. The state and the city jointly has done so and so there are constraints of growing completion of some infrastructures but basically I think city of Mumbai, we all are striving hard and trying to create the best infrastructure but when you plan, I think the time is there that you have to plan for next 50 years not for the next 10 to 20 years. Thank you very much.