This lecture is part of an online Galois theory course, and will be about the Heptadecogon, or the regular Heptadecogon. So Heptadecogon is 7, and deca means 10, so this is a 17-sided polygon. And one of Gauss' most famous early results was showing how to construct a 17-sided polygon using a ruler and compass. Of course, constructing a 17-sided polygon using a ruler and compass is completely nuttily pointless, but it still gives a nice application of Galois theory. Incidentally, when I was checking Heptadecogon, I tried looking at it on Google, and it claims there's a word called Heptadecophobia, which, if you believe this, is apparently a morbid fear of Heptadecogons. There's a Wikipedia article that claims 17 as unlucky in southern European countries, in the same way that 13 as unlucky in northern European countries. I'm not quite sure whether there's some sort of weird Wikipedia hoax. I mean, they do have a picture of an Italian plane where row 17 of seats has been omitted, but for all I know, this is some sort of weird scan by the aeroplane manufacturer to make their planes look bigger or something. Anyway, let's get back to Gauss. First of all, we recall that a number is constructable by ruler and compass is equivalent to saying you can construct it from the rational numbers using the field operations plus, minus, times, divide, and the square root operation. So we take the usual field operations and also allow taking square roots. I'm not going to prove this. It's not too difficult if you know some Euclidean geometry. You first use analytic geometry to show that any number you construct by ruler and compass can be defined using these operations, and conversely you show that using a ruler and compass you can carry out these operations on lengths of lines. So we say a number is, we're going to use an algebraic definition of constructable just to say it's constructable if you can write it using these. So 2 plus root 3, and then you take the square root of that minus 7 and plus the square root of 3 plus root 5, and so on would be a typical constructable number. So at the moment this isn't terribly useful. So let's rephrase it a bit. So alpha is constructable if and only if alpha is contained in a normal extension of the rationals, of course, of degree 2 to the n for some n greater than or equal to 0. And this actually allows us to tell where the numbers are constructable because now we've reduced it to a problem about finite extensions which we can go around applying Galois theory to. So let's just quickly sketch the proof of this. So first of all, suppose alpha is constructable. What this means is we can start with the rationals and then we have, let's call this k0, and then we construct from that a field k1 which is the rationals and then we join the square root of some number alpha 0 in k0. And then we can have a field k2 which is k root of alpha 1 for some alpha 1 in here. All these extensions are degree 2 and eventually we'll get up to kn and our alpha is an element of kn. So alpha is in an extension of degree 2 to the n. But this is not good enough because kn need not be normal. And it's quite easy to see an example of this. In fact, I gave one earlier. All we do is take q containing q the square root of 2, containing q with the square root of the square root of 2. And this is not a normal extension because it doesn't contain the complex square roots of 2. So this construction doesn't prove that alpha is in a normal extension of degree of power of 2. So it's not too difficult to modify this. So we start off with q which is equal to k0 and then we take k1 which is k0 with alpha 0 added. So we take the square root of something in alpha 0. And then we take k2. We don't just take k1 the square root of alpha 1. We also join the square root of all conjugates of alpha 1. And so this is degree 2 and this is degree of power of 2. And similarly, when we take k3 to be an extension of 2, we take this as k2 and then we have the square root of alpha 2 and the square root of alpha 2 prime, square root of alpha 2 double prime and somewhere. These are all the conjugates of alpha 2. And this ensures that each of these extensions is indeed normal. And we obtain k2 from k1 by adding in a lot of square roots and each of that doubles the degree. So this extension still has degree of power of 2. So we find that alpha is in a normal extension of degree of power of 2. It's important that we put normal here because there are lots of degree 4 extensions whose elements are not constructible because you can't solve an arbitrary fourth degree polynomial just by using square roots, for example. So that's shown that if alpha is constructible, it's in a normal extension. Now let's go back the other way. So let's suppose alpha is in a normal extension of degree 2 to the n for some n. Then we look at the Galois group G and this is also as order 2 to the n. So that's a normal extension and we're characteristic zero. So it's a Galois extension and therefore it's Galois group that you can control everything in as order 2 to the n. Now you recall any group of order 2 to the n is nilpotent. So we can find this chain of subgroups g n, g n, g n minus 1, g n minus 2 such that each is normal in the one before and each has index 2 in the previous one. And now we just look at the corresponding field. So we have q contained in k1 contained in k2 and so on contained in kn and alpha is in here. And now each of these field extensions is degree 2. So k2 for example over k1 is of order 2 and this means that k2 can be generated over k1 by taking the square root of something because if we take some element alpha in k2 and it satisfies some, it's a degree 2 extension so it satisfies alpha squared plus a alpha plus b equals naught for a b in k1 and then we can just apply the quadratic formula alpha is minus a plus or minus the square root of a squared minus 4b over 2. I should have used b and c but never mind. And we're not working characteristic 2 so we don't need to worry about dividing by 2 and we can see that k2 is generated by the square root of something over k1 and so on for all the others. So alpha in here is a constructable number. So that shows that a number can be constructed using square roots and field operations if and only if it's in a normal extension of degree 2 to the n. So for example we cannot construct a regular 7 sided polygon. Well constructing a regular 7 sided polygon is more or less the same as constructing the number 2 pi over 7 or the cosine of 2 pi over 7 because if you take a regular 7 sided polygon on 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of a circle of radius 1 then this distance here is going to be cosine of 2 pi over 7 and constructing this distance is the same as constructing the polygon. And we've seen that this number here is a root of an irreducible degree 3 polynomial whatever it was, 8x cubed plus 4x squared minus 4x minus 1 or something like that. So any extension containing cosine of 2 pi over 7 has degree divisible by 3 by the multiplicative formula for degrees so is not a power of 2. So this number here can't possibly be a constructable number and we can't construct a 7 sided polygon. So now let's look at 17 sided polygons or more generally let's look at p sided polygons. So we recall that constructing a p sided polygon is more or less the same as constructing a p-th root of unity so it's a complex number when we say a complex number is constructable we just mean it's real and imaginary parts are constructable rather obviously. So we recall that x of p minus 1 is not irreducible divided by x minus 1 we get x to the nought plus x to the 1 plus all the way up to x to the p minus 1 and we recall that this is irreducible and the standard proof of this is you just change x to x plus 1 and invoke the magic word Eisenstein and Eisenstein's criterion then implies that the polynomial is irreducible. So suppose zeta is a p-th root of unity not equal to 1 so it might be cosine of 2 pi over 7 cosine of 2 pi over p plus i sine 2 pi over p for example then we know the other roots of x to the nought plus x to the 1 plus x to the p minus 1 are the other p-th roots of unity so they are zeta, zeta squared, zeta cubed all the way up to zeta to the p minus 1 so the extension q of zeta is normal because it contains all the other roots of this polynomial it's just the splitting field of this and it's obviously separable because we're working in characteristic nought so it's a Galois extension this is sometimes called a cyclotomic cyclotomic extension cyclotomic extensions are just extensions generated by roots of unity and they're incredibly important and they're the easiest sort of extension and we'll be talking about them a bit more later so anyway now we can work at its Galois group we sort of did this for p equals 7 earlier and the general case is rather similar so we have an automorphism it must take zeta to zeta to the i for i in z modulo pz a non-zero element of that and if we compose these if we take zeta to the i to the j this is just zeta to the ij so the group operation is just multiplication so this is the Galois group and we can see it's the whole Galois group because we know the Galois group is order p-1 and here we found p-1 automorphism so that's everything so we can now say when can you construct a p-sided polygon? well this is equivalent to saying that q of zeta over q has a degree a power of 2 by what we just said we know it's a normal extension so all we need for it to be constructed is a power of 2 well the degree is just p-1 so p is equal to 1 plus 2 to the n for some n and these are the famous Fermat primes Fermat showed that n itself must be a power of 2 so the Fermat primes are 2,3,5,17 257,6,5,5,3,7 so the Greeks knew how to construct regular polygons with 2,3 and 5 sides you can find a construction of a regular pentagon in Euclid's elements and 2,000 years, more than 2,000 years later Gauss really amazed everybody by showing you could also construct regular polygons of this number of sides well so far we've got a we've got a rather abstract existence proof of a construction but if you stop and actually try and use this you'll discover that it's not very explicit I mean we've sort of claimed that we can write zeta in terms of square roots and rational numbers so how do you actually write it down explicitly? and so what I'm going to do now is show how we can give an explicit description of zeta in terms of square roots and for this we're going to use Galois theory so let's just do it for p equals 17 so we know the Galois group is z over 17z times which is 1, 2, 3, up to 16 and we recall from number theory that this is cyclic because the non-zero elements mod p always form a cyclic group and a generator is called a primitive root in fact this is generated by the number 3 it's not too difficult to check and since it's cyclic of order 16 it's got subgroups of order 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 and let's write out these subgroups explicitly we've got the subgroup 1 and then it's contained in the subgroup with 1 and 16 and then it's contained in the group with 1, 4, 13, 16 which is contained in the group with 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 13, 15, 16 which is contained in the whole group so here are the subgroups written out explicitly and corresponding to these we get fields we get a field q of zeta which contains another field which contains another field which contains another field which contains the rational numbers and what we want to do is to figure out generators for these three fields explicitly and write each of them in terms of square roots in terms of the other field so first of all what we want is an element in this field this means it has to be fixed by this group here so that's obvious we just take zeta to the 1 plus zeta to the 16 and this is 2 cosine 2 pi over 17 which is the number we want to construct so there's not much to do there but what you should do is you note that this group 1, 16 has various cosets so let's write out all its cosets so it's got cosets 1, 16, 2, 15, 3, 14 and so on and when I said let's write them out all of them I didn't mean I was actually going to do that because I'm kind of lazy and from that we see there are various other corresponding elements you can write down as zeta to the 1 plus zeta to the 16 zeta squared plus zeta to the 15 and so on and these are all conjugates of zeta to the 1 plus zeta to the 16 under the Galois group let's call this element alpha and we can do the same thing here we can write out the cosets as 1, 4, 13, 16 and then another coset would be 2, 8, 9, 15 and another coset would be 3, 12, 5, 14 and the other one is 6, 7, 10, 11 if I've got them right so there are 4 cosets and here there are just 2 cosets there's 1, 2, 4, 8 etc and the other coset is 3, 5, 6, 7 etc and again for every coset you can write down a corresponding sum over zeta so here we have zeta to the 1 plus zeta to the 4 plus zeta to the 13 plus zeta to the 16 and here we have zeta squared plus zeta to the 8 plus zeta to the 9 plus zeta to the 15 and so on I'm not going to write out the others you can imagine what those are and let's call these elements things so here's alpha and here's beta might be that one there and these are all these things here are the 4 conjugates of beta under the full Galois group and what we can do now is we can write this number in terms of alpha rather easily because so we can write zeta in terms of alpha because you see that zeta squared minus zeta alpha plus 1 is equal to 0 so here we have a quadratic equation in zeta with coefficients in alpha so we can write zeta explicitly in terms of alpha so zeta is alpha minus the square root of alpha squared minus 4 over 2 and so on and now we want to express alpha in terms of something well we have a conjugate of alpha over this field here we can take the conjugate of alpha to be alpha prime which is zeta to the 4 plus zeta to the 13 and the reason for choosing 4 and 13 is because we then have alpha plus alpha prime is equal to beta and you can work out that alpha times alpha prime is equal to one of the conjugates of beta zeta to the 5 plus zeta to the 14 plus zeta cubed plus zeta to the 12 which is this one here so we can express alpha plus alpha prime and alpha times alpha prime in terms of explicit elements of this field so we have this quadratic equation for alpha alpha squared plus something times alpha plus something is equal to 0 where the something and the something are the explicit elements of this field and now we can do exactly the same for these elements we can take this element here and we will find that this element plus this element is equal to this element here and this element times this element will equal something here so we can get an explicit quadratic equation for beta and similarly if gamma is this element here we can get an explicit expression for gamma we find gamma is equal to the square root of 17 minus 1 over 2 if you want to do it explicitly and check your answer so we can get a whole series of quadratic equations each expressing an element of this field in an element of the next field and if you unravel that all you find an explicit expression for cosine of 2 pi over 17 in terms of square roots writing it out explicitly is a little bit of a mess I'm not going to do so because Gauss has already done it so this is Gauss's famous book on number theory Disquisitione's Arithmetica and if you go almost to the end so it's about two or three pages from the end let me magnify this so you can see oops I've overshot a bit right here we have Gauss's expression for the cosine of the angle p over 17 and p is Gauss's notation for 2 pi so here's cosine of 2 pi over 17 expressed in terms of repeated square roots of numbers you see there's the square root of 17 turning up all the time and so on so I guess that's enough about Hector Deckergun's next lecture we'll be doing some other applications of Gauss's theory in particular I'll be giving an algebraic proof that the complex numbers are algebraically closed


Okay, we're back. We're live and this has to be code green But it's a combination of code green and Hawaii the state of clean energy because we have our host Howard Howard wig He's the host of code green, but he's it's more today. Why is it more Sharon? There's a reason that Sharon Moriwaki co-host Well the Hawaii energy policy forum awarded well Howard but that building state building code console and Howard as they chair of the investigative committee accepted the award on their behalf for energy efficiency, and they are the night 2017 Transformation Award winners, and we really wanted to congratulate Howard and and God Johnson Gore Johnson who's the chair of that those state building code console so the the award goes for their Actually updating a really old 2006 energy code which now is is not totally up to speed, but it is a 2016 version That is going to help us get to efficient housing and commercial buildings. No, Howard you want to take it away? Okay Well, we passed we went from being one of the worst in the nation in terms of energy codes to being among the first What's a bad energy code a bad energy code is one that has not updated new? Technologies technology is improving at rocket speed Government is waddling along at tortoise speed So we need to bring Merge new technology with government policy so what that what that means I think we really have to understand this what that means is the code requires The technology to be included in the plans of a building for example And if they're not in the technology the new technology as identified is not in the plan The plan won't be approved precise developer and builder can't build precisely the plan checker shoves it back To the applicant and says get up to date boy And so You know I just just a thought here that since the technology is moving fast The code has to be amended more than just once it has to be amended on a repetitive basis every three years Nationally the codes get amended every three years. Okay. All right, so we know what a bad code is now What's a good code good code is one that incorporates the latest and the greatest of? new Technologies which are much much much more efficient in every way shape or form and in many cases The cost has gone down cost has gone down. Yep, and yet There's arguments. There's controversies. Yep. It's not like you could walk in the Rose Garden here You may have people shooting at you that say no, I don't want you to amend the code I don't want to energy efficient code. Who are those people? Well, it used to be the building industry building industry said, oh, it's gonna cause so much The poor homeowner the first time homeowner with a little baby You know he used to be a stand-up, you know that and So I have hung around these people for so long that I think like a builder every time we look Had a new change. I have cost cost cost in mind Yeah, and I keep it way down and a component of the new code is called the tropical energy code We have a whole new climate zone nationally called the tropical zone and Hawaii's amendments are tailor-made for Hawaii's climate Meaning we can drive the cost of construction down in addition to driving the cost of energy way way way down Taylor to Hawaii's climate. What does that mean in practical effect? I mean an example of something would be in the tropical tropical version of the co as opposed to I don't know the Upstate New York version sure sure sure The mainland code I'll call it that Emphasizes and we'll stick to homes because homes are simpler Emphasizes tight tight tight If the windows must be tight that doors must be tight the walls must be tight the ceiling must be tight So that you get zero virtually zero air infiltration into the home Such that you have to carve out little pukas and purposely bring in just enough outside air so it will get stale yeah, and the Inside air deteriorates if you keep it stagnant to Yeah, the air conditioning just within the building It circulates the air within so that you can have poor quality very poor quality in it's called IAQ indoor air quality No, that's the mainland code Upstate New York What happens with the Hawaii code if we do the tropical version we require? 14% free vent area in relation to floor area so that if you have a thousand square feet of floor You must have 140 feet of free vent and that just doesn't mean window event sit say you've got a sliding window and it's Four feet square by four feet square you slide that window open you've only got four feet square of free vent area the And more than that. Yeah, and you have to optional though. I mean in other words the window is not open all the time Oh heavens to Betsy. No, but so you have to slide the window open or open the window before you get the hundred and forty Precisely yeah, so we have to have a lot of free vent area And we have to have it on this side of the house and that side of the house so you get through cross Free vent means cross-boundation. Yeah And that's beautiful takes advantage of the trade winds of the weather The builders want that Well the The production builders on the ever planes must centrally air-condition the homes Why? Because the lots are very very small So that you it diminishes the air circulation trade wind plus you have great proximity to the your neighbor and What happens if your neighbor has a newborn child? Crying all night domestic argument or a domestic argument or or a large TV You get to hear all about it unless you enclose yourself in okay and turn on the way it is with limited land Yeah, pretty precisely plus it's the hottest area of the island okay all three so we have to provide air-conditioning Yeah, but how does that change your tropical? Okay, that that's not tropical code Then you follow the mainland code and you build that home as tight as a thermos bottle and spot noise Yeah, but it gives the builder options to either go tropical or the mainland code So why wouldn't they want that if you have the smallest lot? I've seen on the other planes is one thousand eight hundred and fifty square feet, which is Yeah And most of the lots are three and a half four and a half thousand square feet very small So what I get is this is very complicated. No simple. Well, it took you 27 years to do it Yeah, well, I have a little experience in it I mean the point is you didn't get this award because it was easy Yeah So and furthermore, you know, I mean have to say you can disagree. I want you to disagree but no this is your award This is you It's really nobody but you you've been you've been clamoring and arguing and advocating for this for as long as I know you And this is a great success. It's like having a beautiful bar mitzvah I was at it. Well, never mind. That's a side story. Yeah Yeah How does it feel I feels very good This is literally as you said years in the making And it's going to result In the new homes being about 33 percent more efficient than the home. We're going to talk about that in the next segment Okay, how does the clean energy feel about it?  You know, there are a number of other awards award nominations But it was because this had such big impact 30 savings as howard said energy efficiency And that is really the the best way for us to reduce our energy use and get closer to It sounds like there's something else here too. It's I mean it's advancing The initiative of clean energy and energy efficiency is the best part of clean energy. Actually, we'll talk about that later Um, but it's it's that we changed the paradigm We moved the needle here. He moved he moved the needle And so he's got to get credit if you want to encourage other people to likewise He's a model for us, right? I didn't have a bit of help just a wee bit of help But the other the other the third criterion is that this is just the starting point So we look to awardees to tell us what they're going to do next with this and how are they really getting the benefit And this had long legs It really can go forward if you get the counties to implement And so this is the next step and we want to know also how the awardee will do that and help them Pursue that so that in fact we get the full benefit of the work that's been done to date Well, I like to know how you achieved it. I mean because um, that's that's uh, of course we we have we have time to talk about those things and we will but How did you how did you achieve this? against, um, you know People who would resist people who would give you pushback in so many ways Did you plover them? Did you call them down to meetings? Did you write them letters and notes and do training? What did you do to change them? Yes? Yes to just about all of that. Yeah This is years into making both at the national level and the local level the the builders who Used to oppose this or is the building industry association? And they are an arm of the na hb national home builders association So one thing I did was attach myself to the na hb Because they were creating a beyond code code. They said here's the national code If we could improve efficiency by 10 percent, what would we do? I became an integral part of that committee nationally. I flew to washington dc many times and I Became working it on the national level in order to bring it back to hawaii and and gaining the respect in all modesty of the na hb staff Which translates into respect by the bia staff and I befriended bia people also And and I talked their language I I've been hanging around with them so long as I said I think like a building Well, I think I saw when the governor was signing the actual rules for this I think I saw glades maroni bia So I thought hmm. That's interesting. So you did get them to come along. Yeah, very good And so what did you learn in the process and you know and you had to educate yourself not over a week or a month or a year But years How did you do that? You had to become like an are you an engineer? By de facto engineer de facto honorary engineer my osmosis my osmosis Because I hang around with engineers like stuff. You said you became familiar with building. How did you do that? Read books read manuals. Yeah read specifications And you left out some Talk to a lot of people who know what they're talking about And you're familiar with every word in that book. Oh, yeah You know, does that change you? Is it made you a different person? It's made me. I know would make me a different person A de facto techie.  I am being a techie again or I'll start being enthusiastic especially, you know to a lay person And it'll be a cocktail party or something, you know Say, you know what the shgc of windows how they have improved and I'll start talking about how it works You keep the that's the way you gain respect. Yeah It lowers the volume of the cocktail party You know that it lets the visible light in while it reflects back the nir near infrared reflectance And it blocks out the uv I'll get all enthusiastic about this People will say I I see a friend I need to talk to I started it. How are you? Well, so one other thing is that you know when you you said before that hawaii The start of this project before the the new code was passed was behind Okay, is is it now in front? Is it even or is it in front? Are we a model for other places? Are they saying wow that guy Howard that code in hawaii? That's really good. Is that what they're saying? That's because I I have a lot of friends nationally and I Reviewed newsletters all the time on the subject and I I was just in Pittsburgh at a conference just a couple weeks ago And so I know what's going on nationally We were with that old jalapeno of a code I'd say in the bottom 15 states Now we have jumped up to being in the top 10 states There are some states that are really really progressive and some that are just in the next tier and we're in the next tier That's great. We moved ahead. I just want to know what so when we were in the jalapeno stage Did that mean that we were preventing? People who wanted to be progressive in their building or was that just a standard that you had to at least meet that and you could do Whatever precisely yeah, it's it's the code is the minimum Nothing wanted to do the minimum if they didn't have to do it value engineering so to say Yeah, it was my job to say this is an old jalapeno. Come on. You're not serving your clients Do something better and it doesn't cost more money or it costs that's the thing And after this this break, we're gonna we're gonna go into our next segment in a minute We're gonna talk about how much money you can save and what it all means and how it's going to change Building and housing in Hawaii. Wow. I'm excited. I can't wait. But for now, let's say goodbye Thanks, Howard. We'll be back in a minute. Thank you. Sharon. We'll be back in a minute This is stink tech. This is uh, this is code green and this is how it wig and Sharon We'll be right back and we'll introduce them properly next time


What's going on guys welcome back to channel critical overload here since about Friday the 13th in a while since we talked about this franchise But we have an update regarding the court struggle that has been dealing with for the past many years at this point This updates coming to us from Larry Zerner who played Shelly in Friday 13 part 3. He went on to become this lawyer He's been providing all the updates while this has been happening. So yesterday. He put out these several these this tweak thread of updates He said it's 4 p.m. And I still don't see a cert petition filed with the Supreme Court in the Friday the 13th case What does this mean? Well, it means the case is officially over and Victor Miller owns the rights to the screenplay or to his screenplay in Friday 13th But only in the US There's an important question he has here at the at the second half Can Victor and Sean just each make their own separate movies? Not really because Victor only owns US rights and only to the first grip and Sean's owns adult hockey mask wearing Jason But can't legally use him in a movie without Victor's permission It's complicated and the final thing he said was hopefully we'll hear some good news in the future in the meantime this Friday is Sean's 80s birthday So everyone pleased with Sean a very happy birthday no trolling and we will see what? 222 brings happy new year everyone So of course if you want to go ahead and read that thread on his Twitter page There's a lot more details because I think he also put out his idea that he thinks that they're Working on some type of resolution where they are having discussions About how to go about making a new movie that they both can agree on that being Victor and Sean in this case Victor Miller and Sean Cunningham, so Honestly, I think the adult version Jason is the is the route most fans will want to see Because if you can somehow make a follow-up to the 2009 reboot then I think that'll satisfy a lot of people But if you just go ahead and do the reboot route once again I don't think there would be that many people that will be against it only because of how Far in the ether of Jason has been since that 2009 film. I mean the the best thing Jason has had since then was a decently enough game from gun media that Honestly was cut short from it the potential it had was cut short because of this core struggles that they've been having going on and Hopefully we get to see something in the future from this franchise honestly the the thing about it is I would say that it's better to Think that we will get another film to just for these two to make up for all this money that they've wasted in court going back And forth about this issue that they've had But we could also end up in a scenario where we ultimately don't ever see Jason or he's again because of them not being able to come To a agreement on anything regarding what the next step should be for them as relates to Going further in with the franchise how to make some money back from again the money that they've wasted in court and You know, I say that they've wasted it and us the fans have paid the price for it because I know a lot of you Have wanted to see another Jason film quite some time I've made some videos in the past talking about all the different things some different things I meant to say that they've talked about in the past for Ideas that were out there for potential sequels and follow-ups that we could have I guess could See happen still if things go a positive route between Victor and Shawn the honest Opinion I have about this is that I just hope that we get a movie that would spawn a Resurgence of the character so that way it can have at least one final good run last Hurrah just like how Michael's had a resurgence just like how ghostface is having its resurgence and Well a resurgence and when I say with ghostface me if screen 5 of success when we end up getting multiple sequels Then I guess you can call it a resurgence, but with Michael. He's definitely having a resurgence right now It's gonna conclude this upcoming year with Halloween ends But Jason and Freddie they have just been not participating in this Chuckie Has season 2 coming out next year There's just so many things that Freddie and Jason are missing out on because most of the significant slashers Have made a comeback in some way shape or form Michael being the one that's been the most successful. I would say since his comeback Given the success of the 2018 film and the success of halloween kills and now we have halloween ends That will write off that trilogy that we have but again Michael But again what I'm gonna say was Freddie and Jason they've not been a part of all this all this buzz that these slashers have been Getting with the resurgence so I would love for Jason to have a film that comes out that either spawns a Spawns a few more entries afterward. I just don't see interest in A Jason or Friday the 13th movie without the adult Jason at this point It's he's been the staple since the second entry since Friday the 13th part 2 He's been a staple the hockey mask became another huge component of the state of that of that character staple in the third entry so Revisiting anything I guess with Mrs. Voorhees I feel like would be Depending on how you portray it on screen I just feel the need and the necessity To make enough to make money would come from you bringing adult Jason back not doing anything But that not to say that you can't do anything but bring adult Jason back I just feel that that is where the money would be for these two because again, they have wasted money in court They let their egos get it get the best of them and they've been in court for years. So You know, I don't have all the ins and outs because then this is not my court trouble This is between those two grown men But it's just a fact of the matter if they really in my opinion are looking at trying to make money back from what they've lost Then it would be doing a movie with the adult Jason not doing anything But that because again, you can make a movie that doesn't include adult Jason and that can still be a good movie But I'm thinking that if these two really are going to try to come to a resolution It would be about what is going to make them the most money and I think that would be reviving the character that horror fans are More familiar with when they talk about Friday the 13 case in point how Casey Becker Answers that question to Ghostface in the original scream instead of saying Mrs. Voorhees, she says Jason and that's incorrect So I think bringing back adult hockey match Jason would be the best course of action You could explore a variety of different things you could give us a sequel to a Previous entry or again, like I said, you could reboot it once again You could give us a sequel to the reboot from 2009 or if you don't want to do that for whatever reason You think you can make money make up the money you lost in court some other way then Don't bring adult Jason back do something else, but it's still still call it Friday the 13th So honestly at this stage I hope Victor and Sean can come to a conclusion or a resolution that would allow us to get a resurgence of Jason Voorhees to See him on the big screen once again but if they don't then I guess we would have to kiss this character goodbye and At that point I would just be hoping that Freddie joins in at some point because Freddie is another horror villain that I would love to Get another movie from I would love to see a better film than what we got in 2010 But let me know what you guys think about the Jason update down in the comment section below if you haven't already, of course Make sure you subscribe turn on post notification in this video in the description I have links my social media accounts on a Facebook Twitter and Instagram you can message me there Of course to let me know if there is any movies news or views you'd like me to cover in the future with all that in Mine guys, I will see you in the next video


Everybody forced here hoping 2022 23 contenders optic basketball hobby 10 box case number 17 pick your team Good Anthony Emma magic Brad M Thunder Brian L Grizzlies Cheng Q nuggets Chun Wei T Wolves Darryl with the Warriors David H Hawks Gage with the Wizards hero Mavericks Isaac W Spurs Jacob M has the Knicks Jeremy P Pacers Kevin L Nets light M calves mark s has the heat mark a bucks and Sons Morris with the Rockets Nicole has the Bulls Robert P Blazers Rory with the Pistons make sure clothes in a Sout Rory you guys to follow with the Kings and Jazz Thane has the Pelicans Thomas C Sixers and Hornets Tom B Lakers Raptors Vaughn Celtics and weighing ass with the Clippers Good luck everybody. We go here. We go Lions gone in Panini one Panini ones down a 14 now Then there's other basketball 10 box case number 17 I guess let's get all these breaks filled up a maculate Maculate Clisio with Luminance and some elite football coming up soon One football is at 14 to go all the teams are marked down a second time. There's a base Chris Middleton black Pandora For the Knicks, it's gonna be Josh Hart Short print black Pandora Knicks Hollow rookie is Patrick Baldwin Jr. Warriors First-class ticket Pelicans Dyson Daniels and a red ice optic illusion of Donovan Mitchell We go there we go plus a redemption of Keegan Murray rookie season ticket Kings Kings nice solid first box there Black Pandora and the Keegan Murray Let's keep it going and they already got him out of the game Keldon Johnson Hollow Aaron Gordon for the nugs legendary Tandems T Mac and Yao Ming There you go Rockets lottery ticket blue ice is the 75 Benedict Mather a nice card Pacers Yeah, you can hit pretty big cars in this stuff, dude Orange Lillard out of 49 for the Blazers 99 Peyton Watson rookie auto variation for the Nuggets Hollow for the heat bam out of bio Red Marcus smarts for the Celtics red numbers game red ice numbers game sons is the book Got a Shrey young for the Hawks on the hollow and Malachi brand of up-and-coming rookie auto spurs That one number to 125 Really Steven dang It is definitely nice card. I like that part a lot. Hello Gary Trent for the Raptors red ice calves uniformity Donovan Mitchell Hollow uniformity Steph Curry Warriors Green Pulsar Trey young low numbered Atlanta. That one's numbered 14 of 25 Nice tray. They were cheap, too. They were like 29 34 bucks something like that and a Mark Williams redemption rookie Variation season ticket blue that goes to the Hornets. All right. Got Mowbly hollow Bradley Beale Wizards first-class ticket red ice Oh check Baji jazz Blue ice numbers game Kings 33 of 75 is the Montas a bonus pink Kuzma to 75 wizards Kyle Kuzma and a Blake Wesley to 75 green rookie ticket auto spurs Good break for the spurs Frons red Chris Paul for the Sun's hollow Tyrese Maxie Sixers Red ice hoop dreams Marjahn Bochamp bucks And a hoop dreams hollow is shade on sharp for the Blazers It's the dope vetted here. You got the 85 contenders auto Allen Iverson Philadelphia 9 of 49 Sick AI that's on card with that sick. That's an amazing throwback. I love it with the green Iverson Congrats on that one Philly. All right Cameron Johnson a hollow Darius Garland calves red Zach Levine bulls Red ice lottery ticket Paolo Ben caro Orlando nice Paolo They blew ice numbers game Tyrese Halliburton Pacers number to 75 So blue ice numbers game of both big pieces of that trade Halliburton and sub onus in the break variation Mathra and rookie ticket auto Pacers Good Pacers box there Yeah, that makes sense the red ice is surprising though Stephen the red ice surprises me But hey, that's the market. That's the market hollow Deserbain Grizzlies Very nice first-class ticket rookie insert Chad Holmgren okc They hollow numbers game Grizzlies jaren Jackson jr. Green pulsar heat rookie Nikola Jovic 15 of 25 Nikola Jovic rookie ticket green pulsar and a redemption Mark Williams again rookie variation season ticket red Hornets again. All right, so 15 on crown team all 17 on immaculate luminance of elite patches Still where we were Let's go guys 17 to go all flawless teams are on sale Be sure to like the stream everybody as much appreciated Helps us out quite a bit and make sure you're subscribed. There's a hollow Lamella ball for the Hornets Hello Paolo magic Numbers game hardened sixers and sweet shots Mitchell for the calves and to 99 a calves perennial contenders autograph Evan Mowbley Move you're killing it to 99 in the Evan Mowbley blue jewel and bead 76ers number 299 Color match season ticket red Rudy Gobert Wolves Legendary Tandems Tony Parker and Obi-Wan Jean Obli Spurs their blue ice-hoop dreams jazz like Baji Like the look of that 62 of 75 good-looking card and spurs again here It's a 99 perennial contenders autograph Devon Vasell. She's got that contract attention to nice hit spurs Go ahead and recap. All right, this to 75 was Kuzma to 25 Yovitch and Shrey To 75 was Halliburton and Sabonis and bead the 99 it's a 75 like Baji Matherin Orange to 49 Damian Lillard autos of Evan Mowbley To 99 Benedict Matherin Malachi Brannum tonight to 125 Peyton Watson out of 99 mark Williams redemption season ticket blue rookie variation season ticket blue God Vasell spurs Kingsky and Murray rookie season ticket redemption Blake Wesley spurs green is 75 Cornish redemption again, Ricky ticket red this time Mark Williams and Allen Iverson number nine of 49 for the Sixers I'm throwback. Thanks again everybody moving on now to the other inner of the case