Alright, so we're back in the after-show. We're good, Ruddo? We are excellent. Alright, excellent. And Stefan's still here with us? I am. Can you hear me? Yes, yes, we can. So this is, I guess, the segment of the show that we have optionally. It's just kind of a low-key discussion, not as formal.  I will say I've seen Ruddo's name all over the Internet for years. So your name is familiar. Really? Oh yeah, yeah, I've seen you all over the Mises threads and things. Well, I've been around for a little while, a couple of years, maybe a decade or so, and now I feel embarrassed. I feel young for once. I didn't even know you were that ancient, Ruddo.  Don't tell anyone I'm like a vampire. People think I'm younger. It's good. Well, I want to personally thank Mr. Kinsella for his work, because it was probably two or three years ago that, you know, you moved me even farther from the Objectivist camp that I had kind of gotten started in. You know, it was the intellectual property that was a big holdout for me in holding on to some of those ideas. And your book broke it to me. I mean, after that, there was no going back to I and Ran. Thanks. I've heard similar things from a lot of people. It is an interesting issue that it's like anarchy and IP or sort of really big log jam issues for a lot of people. But I mean, I feel a little bit embarrassed taking credit for a lot of this because, you know, I was searching myself in the early 90s and finally came across the same epiphanies that like, you probably had by reading, you know, Tom Palmer and Wendy McElroy and other people. So they just didn't really put it all together and they weren't focused on it that much because it was sort of a simmering issue in the background in the early 90s and late 80s and 70s, you know. Wendy McElroy was as a young lady, she debated, I think he was Tucker, right? No, no, Shulman. Shulman who was defending the ideas of what's this guy who was went in prison for competing with the Constitution of No Trees in the sky. Shulman was defending the ideas of, oh my God, I forgot his name. You mean Lysander Spooner? Yes, exactly. Oh, I never thought of Shulman being, hmm, well, yeah, Spooner had crazy IP ideas.  But Shulman sort of had more of an unrandian type argument or neo-randian argument for it, but I never heard him reference Spooner but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. But yeah, he came out with his logo rights argument. He's actually more similar to Galambos. I think probably the craziest IP guys would be Galambos and Spooner and even Ayn Rand in a way, although she toned it down a little bit by putting artificial, you know, arbitrary terms on the stuff she favored. But Galambos and Shulman were kind of nuts. I mean, not Shulman, not Spooner. Shulman's stuff is out there too, but he's a good guy. He's like the guy, you know, he's just, what can you say? Yeah, he's a little bit mistaken. It's okay, you know, people come around, right? I myself was not yet a libertarian, much less an anarchist when I discovered Baldwin and Levi's book against Intellectual Monopoly which sort of made me into a copyright minimalist and patent minimalist. And then, well, then I discovered your book, right? And that's what actually paved the way because I instinctively knew anarchy would not be possible if these things, intellectual poverty had any, it could hold any water, right? It was sensible in any way that anarchy would just not be possible, would not be sensible because, you know, well, what state is going to enforce these things if there's no state, right? So I have to say again, thank you for writing the book that you wrote because that's essentially the thing that allowed me to just consider anarchy in full. Well, okay, you're welcome. I wanted to barge into this, like, the Kool-Aid guy through a wall. Oh, yeah. Yeah, I mentioned, we had a listener and friend who wanted to ask some questions in the regular show, that's by the name Lightning. Lightning, are you there to ask some questions now? Yes, I am. All right, all right, go far away. Sorry we couldn't fit you in the regular show hour.  Okay, so my main question, I was interested particularly because you have a good understanding of the legal kind of how copyright works in that sense being a patent attorney, apparently. I'm addressing this to Mr. Consola. Yeah, that's right. So, Bitcoin, sure we go back on Bitcoin and IP, was released anonymously by a fellow apparently named Satoshi Nakamoto. And so, there was released under, I think what's called a permissive license. MIT license, I think. Yeah, basically, I'm not sure, but I think what that means is that you could include the source code in a proprietary program whereas a copy left license, you can't. I think that's a distinction. Correct, you're correct. Anyway, so my question was, if someone was to release something anonymously but they wanted to keep a non permissive license on it, how would they go about enforcing that without revealing their identity in a court law and what kind of strategies do you think? Are you saying today or in a copyright free world? Today is, yeah. Well, I guess they would do it like the Bitcoin guy did. Is that what you mean? Well, he hasn't ever actually enforced any claim in an illegal court of law because well, he doesn't want to, you know, what will happen to him if somebody finds out who he is, right? Bankers are not very happy with him. So assuming that you were his attorney but you wouldn't reveal his identity, how would you go about establishing a claim of copyright infringement on behalf of the guy? Well, so normally this issue comes up with, you know, software which they usually release under even open source software. They release not with what would be the equivalent of a, like a CC BY license but more like the equivalent of a CC essay, share a like, right? Or copy left, like you say, or the GNU, I think, right? And I think that does impose restrictions on its use in proprietary software, things like that. But my understanding is the only way it can be enforced would be some individual or corporation has to be the registered owner of the original copyright because a license is a grant of permission by someone who could otherwise stop you by using copyright. So in other words, the entire concept of a license only makes sense if we assume there's a copyright. And if we assume there's a copyright, we have to know what the work is and who the owner is. Correct. So the only way that the only way the license is going to be respected or enforced if there's an identifiable owner who is ready and willing to enforce it in government courts. Now, in the Bitcoin situation, to be honest, I've been trying to learn about this for a year now and I'm getting a better understanding of how it works technologically. I was not aware that they had any kind of copyright copy left type license on the code. I thought it was an open thing and it was just structured technologically so that it's almost impossible for someone to get into someone's Bitcoin account without their permission or without their key and all this kind of stuff. I actually don't understand the legal situation of the Bitcoin code. If it's copy lefted and if the guy intended to be anonymous and he was for a while, right? He's still anonymous. I don't know how he could enforce it. I don't even know what a copyright infringement would be. What could someone do that would be an infringement? Would they make a second Bitcoin system in the world, Bitcoin 2, and compete with Bitcoin? They can't modify the code without complying with the format. I don't understand how anyone can even violate the copyright. Imagine, for example, that the Bitcoin software, which is MIT, imagine it's not MIT software. It's not MIT license, which is a permissive license. Imagine it's a GNU license or just a proprietary license for the purposes of the thought experiment. Somebody repackages the software and does something with the software that is contrary to the license. For example, if the software was a GNU, then making it proprietary and distributing the source with the package would be an infringement of the license and then that would naturally lead to the revocation of the license plus whatever code action is necessary to get you to stop doing what you're doing, which is an infringement of the license. This would be an example. As of today, it's really just MIT software, so it will be very unlikely that Satoshi Nakamoto at some point will show up and say, you're infringing the license because... Wait, what did you say? It was MIT software? Yeah, it's MIT permissive license license. What does MIT mean? It's a license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which essentially allows you to do whatever you want with the software. Even if it's mixing it with other software that is proprietary and compiling it and not distributing the source code, you're perfectly allowed to do anything. So it's not a share like... But the software, it's not from MIT. He designed it. You're just saying it's an MIT license. Exactly. Like a Creative Commons thing. I got it. It's confusing. I know. It's kind of confusing. No, no. I just want to make sure I understand that. So yeah, it would probably be an impossible situation for the person to even sue anyone, not to mention the fact that the license makes it extremely unlikely that there will be any copyright infringement action possible against anyone who's using the software in any way. It seems... I can't even imagine a case where you would actually do something that would hurt Bitcoin either because it's such a robot system, right? I mean, what can you do that would... I mean, it's not even against the rules to try to find someone's key. It's just too expensive to do it, right? That is correct. You don't even own Bitcoins. I was explaining to someone, it's like there's an airport with a trillion sort of private little lockers with unique numbers on each one, and someone gives you the identity and key to one of them, and no one else knows where that one is or what the key is. So even if you don't own it, you're the only one who practically can get to that locker and open it up and put something in it or take something out. If you hand that key to someone else, then they have the ability. So you don't really have ownership rights anyway. I agree. It's just a very complicated question because while you would think of owning a Bitcoin as something that is analogous to the real world, it is only really analogous to the real world because of certain mathematical difficulties artificially introduced to simulate scarcity, right? What there really is out there is nothing but a ledger, and you have a key in your computer that allows to unlock parts of this ledger and transfer some of the funds in your ledger to someone else, and it's a shared ledger. So there's really the concept of ownership doesn't apply except for the most symbolic or metaphorical of senses, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. No, I think that's right. That's very good. So I don't know if I can answer this question because I don't think I understand it well enough, but I think my basic answer would be you just cannot, I mean, without copyright, you wouldn't have even the concept of a license, a permission, but you don't need permission if there's no copyright. You'd only have certain nondisclosure type agreements, but that's a very limited case. So if you're asking how can someone in a libertarian way enforce their copyright, I mean, you can't. You can only enforce copyright by enforcing copyright through the state's legal system, which is by and large illegitimate, I believe. So you mentioned the nondisclosure agreements and actually, Lightning, I were talking a bit about nondisclosure agreements before the show as well. Do you think that, you know, in the absence of copyrights and patents and all that, do you think nondisclosure agreements would emerge to kind of at least cover up, you know, take the place of maybe the good stuff that copyrights do if there is good stuff? No, actually, don't. Here's why. Number one, that makes more sense in the field of patents, not copyrights because patents have to do with sort of innovations that you could, in some cases, theoretically keep as what is called a trade secret. That is, you just keep your proprietary process secret. But even that's... Like a Coase. Yeah, but even that's, apparently, if you check on Snopes or whatever, apparently the formula for Coca-Cola has been known for decades. The secret recipe? Yeah, they're not really secret. They're not really secret.  You want to say, here's why we're different and why we're better, right? I mean, only these ultra-cheap fly-by-night knockoff artists are going to try to duplicate it. And then they're known to be knockoff and flimsy. So a legitimate big-scale competitor is going to want to slap their name on it and have their brand and their identity and say why they're different and why they're better. I think that the original argument for patents well, not the original one, but the one that's been given since they become statutory and widespread in the US and the western world is that without patents, companies have too much of an incentive to keep their stuff secret. Because if they reveal it to the public, then they're going to have competition and they're going to, you know, everyone's going to emulate what they're doing. So they're going to keep stuff secret. So to encourage companies to divulge to the world the secrets that they're using, we give them a 17-year monopoly or something like that. So the original purpose of patents in the statute is not to encourage innovation, is to encourage divulging information, right? But the problem is that what happens is companies still keep trade secrets on things that they can keep a trade secret on. But most products, you reveal the secret by selling it anyway, right? Like if I have a new mousetrap, I can't help but tell people what's different about it. In fact, that's how I sell it. I say, my new mousetrap has this new feature. It's better than everyone else's. So you're telling the entire world what's better about your mousetrap.  So the patent system doesn't really encourage people to publicize information that they wouldn't have had to publicize anyway just at the price of going public with a product, right? That makes sense. And I think what's going... Even today, though, when you approach a company or you discuss certain things with employees, you make them sign non-disclosure agreements. Half the time, that is just for complying with trade secret law. Trade secret law, which is another type of IP law which I think should be abolished, to be honest. It's not as bad as patent and copyright or trademark, but it should be abolished as well. Trade secret law says if you have a secret that is a confidential recipe or some information in your company or in your business that gives you a competitive advantage over other people if and to the extent that only you know it, okay? Then, if you have that kind of secret which, by the way, you don't need the law to keep a secret. You can just keep secrets. But what the law says is if you have that so-called trade secret, then if it's about to be revealed illegitimately, like let's say a former employee leaves and he's telling a competitor or whatever, then you can go to the court and if you can prove to the judge that number one, the secret hasn't gotten out to the whole public yet where it's still a secret, it's not a publicly known thing yet, then if you can prove that you made a diligent effort to keep it secret which means the use of non-disclosure agreements, then the judge will issue an injunction against not only your former employee but also against the person he's been talking to and they will tell them you cannot use or reveal this information under contempt of court penalties. So in other words the court threatens to put you in jail if you use information that you've received, even if you're not a former employee, even if you've never signed a contract right, even if you don't have a contractual relationship with a company, even if you didn't induce the employee to tell you he just was going to spill the beans and give you information, or he already did give it to you. So that's the problem with trade secret law. So it's binding to third parties? Yes, that's the whole problem with trade secret law, that's the whole reason. I didn't know that. If it didn't affect third parties then you wouldn't need a special law. It would just be you keep a secret if you want to if you don't want to don't, or you'd have a contract that you can enforce or whatever. So you'd still be sorry to interrupt but you'd still be cool with the idea of non-disclosure agreement simply between like the two parties, like an employee and a employer and yeah, but all that can do is basically say, you know, if you spill the beans and you owe me money you gotta pay me a penalty, right? You gotta pay me damages. So even there I think that they're not that useful. I think that the most useful thing is reputation. In other words if you get a reputation for being someone who can't be trusted, like a lawyer, I mean a lawyer or a doctor, you know, or a priest someone who's supposed to keep secrets right are people that confide in them. In some cases you can spill the beans but if you start doing that then you're not going to get customers you're not going to be trusted. So I think reputational effects are actually more important than NDAs but yeah, I think theoretically NDAs could have a limited use and would be enforceable. For restitution at least. Yeah, for restitution, right. But think about it, either the penalty in the NDA is going to be something trivial like, you know, $100 or it's going to be astronomical like a billion dollars. So if it's a billion dollars, who would sign such an agreement? I mean not many people, right? And if it's trivial you'll sign it but then there's not really much of an deterrent to getting you know, bribed to spill the beans by someone else. So to me it's sort of a contract that if it's enforceable and has an effect, no one will sign it and if people sign it then it's not that much of an deterrent. You can still hide trade secrets and proprietary knowledge even with the patent system, the way it's set up because the reviewers don't do the job, the judges are not experts in the field that they're ruling on. I was doing some research on inorganic polymer chemistry and there was a series of patents owned by a company in France. They were US patents and they were very detailed but you could not reproduce the formula based on what was given in the patent. The way they worded it was very, I won't say fuzzy, they were very clever in the way they worded it. They gave all the ingredients, all the proportions but you couldn't reproduce it based on the information you gave you. You know, they kept that as a trade secret but if you were able to reproduce that substance they could still sue you in violation of the patent but good luck trying to figure that out yourself. Well and this is a little bit inside baseball and it's boring to a lot of people but well first of all patent learners are very good and they're good at manipulating the system and there's tricks they play, usually within the rules whatever these rules are they're sometimes nebulous but so for example and this is actually one I don't disagree with completely it's not the same as what you're talking about but if you have certain words and some patent applications like let's say physical nuclear material right then it's going to catch certain flags by these government computers and it's going to be subject to a special defense department review and sometimes you'll get this notice back after you file a patent that well every time you file a patent you'll get a notice back after a few months saying you know this is okay to publish now and you guys can proceed with this it's just sort of formality but every now and then the government seizes it and says oh no no we've got to confiscate this patent it's too sensitive and then they'll compensate you or whatever this is rare but what you could do is let's say you have a patent for I don't know the reuse of depleted uranium in some kind of totally non-military application like I don't know an iPhone case that could have better battery life or withstand solar radiation because it's got depleted uranium fissile material in the shell it's a bad example but you get my idea you could write the patent application and you could just use chemical symbols or some kind of accurate but obscure way of describing you just don't use the word nuclear don't use the word fissile right and then it won't flag the computers so lawyers will do that kind of stuff to avoid getting these defense department things and they'll also do things like you're talking about because the patent law requires you to disclose remember I told you the original theory is not to encourage innovation is to encourage disclosure so what they call the patent bargain is that we're going to give you a monopoly if you tell us how this works and even though people can't use how it works for 17 years they can at least start learning about it and studying it and etc. what that means you've got to disclose one in a written description it's got to be what we call enabling which means it's got to be enough detail to enable someone else to make it without what they call undo experimentation and you have to disclose the best mode so it's like there's like 10 ways of doing it and there's one way that you know is the most efficient or the best and you describe five of them or nine of them and you leave the best one out and until recently that was actually grounds for invalidating the patent because there's three like I said three requirements enabling description or written description and the best mode has to be disclosed that doesn't mean you have to disclose every every little detail but you have to disclose it sufficient to where someone equally skilled in the art could make it and reproduce it without undo experimentation they say and it sounds like the examples you gave or cases where they didn't do that or at least according to your opinion right? it didn't even sound like a valid patent to me I mean if you can't reproduce it based on what's given I mean you can't hold secret information and still claim a patentable process and that's a whole other issue it should be a valid patent if it doesn't have utility which means it doesn't work that's a whole other requirement but anyway under Obama's patent reform law which has passed about a year and a half ago called the America Indents Act they eliminated the penalties for failing to disclose the best mode I mean for 50 or 90 or more years this has been one of the ways you could attack a patent if you could prove that the patent lawyer or the inventor who filed it intentionally withheld the best mode and they just disclose the worst modes right? they're keeping in essence a trade secret while they're still getting a monopoly on the idea right? which is not the bargain the bargain is you can keep it as a secret or you can disclose it and we'll give you a monopoly that's the bargain Obama's America Indents Act inexplicably removed all the penalties the law still says you have to disclose the best mode but there's no penalty if you don't do it the penalty used to be you'd lose your patent and you might get this barred or whatever now it's just well you shouldn't have done that I mean it's unbelievable I wouldn't say it's inexplicable it's perfectly explicable but then again if you explain it as what it is which is essentially another favor for people who are intellectual monopolists then people will say well you're saying that because you hate innovation and stuff right? you're against science because science requires patents everyone knows that it's empirical I have a question for you which has been floated in the chat for at least an hour and we couldn't actually field it and I'd like to share this question with you because the person asking the question is again my friend James Carlin who thinks that intellectual monopolies are feasible in a free society he's asking how can you defend the use of force, the use of violence in defense of property that which we understand to be tangibles that are owned right? can you hear me? alright so maybe my question didn't go through maybe my mouse needs to change batteries so the question is I heard you so I think I had a wifi stutter just repeat the last 10 seconds absolutely so how would you go about defending the use of violence to protect property and be a very very specific tangible things that are owned well I think that defending the use of violence for anything other than self defense is trickier I think it can be done but that's a different issue so let's just talk in the bare case of violence for self defense I mean so what's the alternative and what is the context in which this happens the context is that there is a scarce resource which is at least currently claimed or possessed and presumably originally possessed by the current claimant the defender right? yeah and by its nature it's a scarce resource which means it is something that's rivalrous, it's conflictable that is only one person can use it at a time and if two people try to use it they're going to have physical violence so the physical violence arises as a combination of number one the fact that the resource is scarce is that type of thing it's not like ideas or information and number two there are two people that are trying to actually physically use force to causally employ this thing at the same time presumably at least one of them without respecting the claims of the other person so the alternative to not using force to defend it would mean you just give in and let the other guy use it but he's the one using force then so to say that no one can use force in a sense in my view ends up justifying the use of force on the part of the latecomer so it's just like I've always thought that these extreme pacifists in a sense they're more egalitarian they basically put the aggressor and the victim on the same plane because they view the aggressor as use of defensive force to defend their bodies or their homesteads or their property they're saying they're just as bad as the guy that's invading because they're both doing something wrong and as a libertarian I actually believe that that is one of the fundamental things that we oppose we oppose treating the victim of crime and aggression the same on a moral status as the aggressor I think they're actually fundamentally different that's why we're against aggression but we're not against defensive force if we're not for defensive force we cannot be against aggression so to paraphrase if I'm getting this right you're basically saying that because things are scarce in rivalries violence is the default and property norms are there is a way to avoid violence and it's only when they're broken that we get to this situation where violence has to be used anyway exactly and I think yeah exactly I think that's right it's a default and when it's broken that's there's a problem and I think that we have I mean look if we try to envision an anarchotopia in the future you know I'm sure you guys get this or think about this question all the time how if we elect a bunch of Ron Pauls or whatever what's going to keep us from adopting a state just right again right away. Can I patent Ron Paul's DNA? Technically you can. Yeah he might he might not be able to argue against it since he's not against patents I believe constitutionalist but whatever so my thinking is that the only way we would ever as a practical matter achieve a fairly libertarian society is that if most people are libertarian and I actually think most people already are libertarian they're just somewhat libertarian so if you have enough people that are enough libertarian and if you ever got to that point it's going to have to be via transition from now to there so for some reason we're going to become more libertarian and if that ever happened for whatever reason then by the time you got to that point then most people are libertarian and so they wouldn't tolerate a little mini-state arising out of the remnants of the old you know withered away state system and then the second question is how could that ever happen could you think it could happen without being some kind of utopian or Marxist you know believing a new libertarian man or whatever and I simply think that the only hope and it's a possible hope is that humans will gradually become more economically enlightened just by empirical experience and just by the advent of prosperity and technology and the and the success of the free market despite the state's attempts to snuff it out so you know I always think that in you know 1990 1991 when communism collapsed it was a it was an educating moment for people not in a theoretical way most people are still kind of as stupid in economics as they used to be but most a lot more people now would be reluctant to endorse central state planning of the economy in an explicit way than they would before 1990 because of communism collapsed and provided a visible example that that just doesn't work and I kind of hope that the the internet and technology and the free market will eventually enlighten people as to the necessity of free markets and so they'll gradually become more economically literate just innately do you know what I mean and that will gradually make us more more libertarian and see the state is less and less necessary to where it doesn't have enough legitimacy to keep doing what it's doing anyway sorry that was a tangent it's good tangent though it's the time we like I would say to add to that the state is a temporary entity by I mean by the way it works it can't exist forever in its current incarnation it has to run out of money eventually so there's always the hope that in transitions when things get really bad that people are open to do they become more open less complacent yeah there was a good I just listened to Jeff Tucker's interview with Gerard Casey this Irish anarchist Rothbardian philosopher no relation to Doug Casey right no no he's actually a newcomer to this field he's probably more related to me can sell as Irish it was from about a year and a half ago and they were talking about like Rothbard's take on the state and all this stuff and he was talking about historically how the state as we conceive of it now the modern state really only arose in the 16 well the 17th century 1600s and before that it had totally different nature and relationship to the people and what I think is hopeful about that is that and then he pointed out the example he said that people get used to the way things are and they started thinking that the way things are now the way they must be and he the example he gave was like in Ireland I guess when he was younger if you wanted a telephone if you wanted a telephone you had can you guys hear me yeah sorry just a light for a little bit but we hear you if you want to telephone you got to call the government telephone agency and they had to wait eight weeks and they would come just deliver a black telephone and stick it in the hall somewhere you didn't get a choice about where it was what color it was and you know and people just assumed it had to be that way and now no one believes that because we have cell phones and land lines are almost dead and everything is totally different and I don't know it kind of gave me hope thinking that well likewise if the states only been around since 16 the mid 1600s then maybe it stays or it's not really a permanent fixture of life like we sort of pessimistically sometimes think it unfortunately might be well I certainly think with the advent of you know we just really love Bitcoin in the show but the advent of digital cryptocurrencies and 3d printing and a lot of like decentralized personalized stuff that can't be bucked with by centralized authorities yeah I think technology is kind of a bit of a salvation there hopefully I have hope for that in my mind technology provides something fundamental that mankind needs to overcome the state and that is protection of the individual against people seeking to do harm to them I have a theory as to what would happen if at some point we invented this personal protection shield device imaginary thing that I keep in my mind as a as an idea of what could be the final frontier of personal protection if you could wear something that will protect you from anything being stabbed from bullet wounds from anything that could just activate at will the very first thing that would happen is that device would be outlawed it has to be outlawed because the state cannot function if such a device becomes popular right the end of the state is what the device means this is what technology affords us incrementally until such device is invented that allows us to escape or protect ourselves from aggression that will be the default technology will continue to improve and improve and improve to protect ourselves better and better against aggression are you imagining that extended to property too or just to your body because if it's only your body then the government could still threaten or harm you by taking your land away or whatever I mean it's true but yeah I imagine that if such a device were to be invented it would probably be feasible to and of course with a little bit of more extra energy expenditure you would probably be feasible to do the same thing to generate this force field around physical property right yeah it's funny I used to have a fantasy which is probably due to my randy and sort of original upbringing of kind of the opposite of that which was like some kind of satellite up in the sky that would instantly just zap anyone getting aggression I mean just incinerate them like kind of like an omnipotent omniscient infallible artificial intelligent you know the sky net basically right now of course it's not technologically possible and it wouldn't be a good idea anyway for various reasons but just the fantasy idea of that anyone at any time on the earth who ever tried to commit a crime is just zapped especially expropriating property protectors yeah of course they'd be the first ones to go right overnight there's actually a comic about it called death note it's pretty interesting oh really death net death note N-O-T-E it's about a guy who's given a notebook by a god where if you write someone's name in it if you write someone's name in it the person dies and so he decides that he should kill all the evil people in the hopes that humanity becomes like this utopian society and it's basically the whole comic is about his like fight with this master detective what about what if he wrote god in that book what would happen I don't think he ever tried that sounds I gotta look this up this sounds cool it's a manga it's Japanese but it's really good it's probably the best manga there is I think that's why subjective taste there was a novel by Victor Coleman a libertarian sci-fi guy maybe 20 years ago 30 years ago called the Jehovah contract you heard of that one and some some guys he gets a contract to kill god and it's kind of a I think basically the idea is that god exists because people believe in him so he mounts an advertising campaign like on billboards like on July 29th god will die and you know as the days take down everyone starts freaking out and on that day I guess they believe it so he believe in god collapses so they can claim that god died or whatever something like that if I recall it's been a long time there's no god that's a very interesting premise if we could launch advertising campaign that would say there's no government and do the same thing imagine yeah yeah I know and the government's a lot easier in a way I think to you know to cast as a bad guy than god and to kill and get rid of so yeah I think I think we're winding down here I can feel the energy starting to dip a bit so wanna wanna wrap this up again Ron do we have an outro? I didn't expect to be this generous with this time this is great we'll be able to post this kind of after show content and I should have said in the intro that we own the property rights to all of it the full two hours very good yeah I actually when I get the MP3 I'll put it in my new podcast feed too so no I enjoyed it guys you guys are great this is a hot look up your show yeah please do it's been fantastic and if you wanna throw us on yours and we were I don't know if you've heard the song but the drop it like it's hop we were considering doing that for our outro sometimes we changed it up and we thought okay this could be good considering your own pretty cool I know the guy that wrote the lyrics Evan Isaac wrote the lyrics and one of his buddies did the music I believe so yeah it's pretty cool nice so I'll have to throw that on an after-processing I get to do but yeah as always when asked always declined to state thank you so much for coming on Stefan and I hope you have a great evening thanks guys enjoyed it thank you alright bye bye good night everyone good night you sexy people yeah it was fun thanks guys yeah oh god definitely not gonna do that great that sounds horrid that's awesome like it's hot but drop it like it's hot but drop it like it's hot yeah


Day one of the Mustang Classic, RIT picks up the 15-9 win over Washington in league. Glenn Clark with the head coach, Jake Kuhn from RIT. Coach, congratulations, first of all. They really tested you there in the first half, right? Battled back, got it even. How was your team able to respond the way that it did from that point? They were resilient today, for sure. I can tell you right now, that first quarter was sloppy and rough. And our goalie played amazing today. He really bailed us out in that first quarter and kept us in the game and kept us feeling OK about things and continued that throughout the game. He had 19 saves, which is, man, he had a great day. We were struggling a little bit clearing the ball. They were riding us pretty hard and gave us some fits on the ride. But we found our way out of that first quarter, and then we kind of settled in. Yeah, they're a scrappy group. We really had to work for it today. You mentioned Zeborowski, who was magical in the first half, right? And then I'm glad you brought that up, because we pointed that out. It didn't dip, was you guys got that big lead. It seemed like he was just to sharp the rout and really set the tone. Yeah, he's been pretty consistent for us so far this year. We have two seniors, and we decided to go with him as the starter, which is a really tough decision. Those guys are pushing him every day and do a great job of giving him the support he needs. And I feel for them because they're seniors are going to put their time in, but Ze's been playing really well. So we're going to ride that as long as we can. I hope he can continue that through tomorrow and beyond. So when your team is at its best, we saw a couple of times today where the ball movement was just phenomenal. I mean, it's just absolutely incredible. You're off to this great start. How key has that been for you when you're moving the ball like that and just getting such quality shots? Yeah, I mean, we've always tried to be as unselfish as we possibly can and play at a fast pace, keep the ball as hot as possible. I was actually a lot of ahead of you with Ze, but I was actually pretty impressed with our defense today. We gave up a lot of shots, but I thought they played pretty well throughout the course of the day and only give up nine. A lot of it, again, was our goal tending, but I thought they did a good job. We were sloppy a bit today. I think we had 20 turnovers, so not our best day in terms of that. But I give them a lot of credit for putting the pressure on us and making it difficult. So just glad to see the guys battle through it. Coach, obviously you're no stranger to this event, but you get to celebrate a top 10 win by getting like five minutes. And then you've got a heck of a test coming up tomorrow again. Yes, we do. Yes, we do. And it's like that every year. You've got to gear back up, rest, recover as fast as possible, and kind of get back on the scout for our next opponent. And yeah, we've got a tough day tomorrow ahead of us. We know that, and we're excited for the challenge. Coach, congratulations and great win. Great to have you back here at the Classic. We'll see you tomorrow. Thanks, Glenn. Appreciate it. Thank you. That's Jake Kuhn. I'm Glenn Clark. Go Mustang Sports.tv.


Woo! That torque store sound good going by! Oh give me a rev! Now you guys sit here and tell me if you saw this truck going down the road would you at all think this truck is gonna make the noise that's about to come out of this thing. We are back on project storm as you can see and as you heard storm sounds like an insane storm that is a loud blow-off valve not even a lie but storm is done as most of you guys know we took it to Moe Party we took it up to show it off in the Torx storm booth made the trip all the way from Georgia to Kentucky to Bowling Green for Moe Party truck drove perfectly fine all the way up there and back made the trip good and we're pretty much all done with the tuning now we just got to try to get some time and actually run it on the track and we're gonna try to make that happen before the season closes up not really sure but we're gonna definitely try as my hometown track here actually has closed up and is no longer so the closest track now to me is gonna be about two-hour drive but we're gonna really really try to get storm on the track so we can get some time comparisons from when it was bone stock but other than that guys there we go she is running she's a mean storm and we're gonna show it off here a little bit we're gonna do a couple flybys down this little road right here we're sitting at and just kind of have fun with storm for a second all right so here we go project storm got it nice and clean we're about to go have some fun make some little passes down this little back road for the people that is just tuning into the channel for the first time this is project storm we have a bunch of videos on the torque storm super charger install the meth injection install along with the boost gauges and AFR gauges lots of videos on the truck so if you missed them go check them out there's tons and tons of videos of us installing all this all the goodies on to project storm so project storm is a 2012 Ram 1500 5 7 hemi this is a 4x4 crew cab and all stock motor stock camshaft stock transmission still has a stock converter only thing that's been changed and upgraded on project storm is obviously the torque storm supercharger we have the snow performance water meth injection kit installed and as far as our fueling goes we're running the stock pump with a set of thick 650 injectors and that's pretty much it besides some good tuning so pretty simple install truck runs and drives great we're having fun with it and again most of you guys know we have no in no intercooler on this truck this is all straight relying on water meth injection we was trying to keep this as simple and easy to do as possible for somebody wanting to tackle this in their driveway and not worrying about all the hassle of running plumbing for an intercooler setup so our water meth nozzle is right here and then we are utilizing the factory window washer reservoir tank this is where we're putting our snow boost juice which is a 5050 mix of water meth and then we have our boost signal sensor right here and this is running to manifold vacuum to pick up vacuum and boost so I think we have it set to come on around 4 psi so when the truck sees 4 psi boost it kicks on the water meth pump and it starts spraying the water meth injection mix right into the intake manifold and that is all there is to it and then over here we have the PLX wideband gauge we have the Mopar auto meter boost gauge and then the green light right here is our water meth injection notifier light so when our meth injection kicks on the light turns green and lets you know that the water meth system is activated so there you go like I said pretty easy deal again we have lots of videos on the series of project storm like the supercharger install the injector install the meth injection install the gauges and the pillar install there's a handful of videos that goes over all of that stuff so let's do what we came here to do we're gonna crank up storm we're gonna get a couple little passes going down the street here and get a couple flybys kind of out here in the middle of nowhere right now just the way I like it down here in Georgia and we're just gonna kind of go straight down here get some flybys I'm gonna go down here on the big end and let my buddy rip on down here and get a fly by we should be able to hear the supercharger and the blow off valve pretty good as it goes by us and then we'll even get some inside footage I'll get in the truck and we'll do a pull with me inside the truck and have some fun so hell yeah let's go put the old torque storm to work so I'm back here probably a good eighth mile on this little back road I'm gonna give my buddy the the wave to send all storm down the road let's get a torque storm fly by here we go send it that torque start sound good going by man I'm telling you I love the sound of the torque storm centrifugal it's like the best of both worlds it's like a it's like a centrifugal supercharger noise that you obviously get but you also get like that turbo noise it's crazy I love it here he comes again oh give me a rev now you guys sit here and tell me if you saw this truck going down the road would you at all think this truck is gonna make the noise it's about to come out of this thing that you saw project storm getting it done this sounded good going by dude this sounded good you want to talk a little bit I let off a little bit after back there I could have kept going yeah let out of it I think when you're in here with it I won't keep it going right all right I'm gonna ask you a couple easy questions all right you ready all right project storm is finally done now we just got to track it but between bone stock and today is there a big difference to you oh my god it's night and day it's it's it's beautiful that's all I can say you've been daily in this truck every day to work since it's been done now just daily driving it I mean how's it feel too as far as just having fun daily in it to work whatever daily driving feels like a normal truck you don't really notice it much until you get into it but once you get into it you got that power that you've been looking for it's it's amazing so again obviously when we ran this truck stock we were what was it running like 15 715 708 at 87 miles an hour that's what I thought so we don't know what it's gonna run yet we are not changing anything as far as tires go whenever we can hit the track but I think we both would be happy if we seen a 13-second pass maybe a high 12 I don't know if that's possible 4x4 stock you know it's still got this stock exhaust manifolds it's got catalytic converters it's got you know it does have the flowmaster mufflers but it's got a lot of stock stuff stock cam just a supercharger guys that's it and we're running about on our logs we've been peaking what seven seven seven seven seven seven and a half psi I'm gonna hop in the truck and we're gonna get an inside view of storm making a hit down here on this little back road so hell yeah let's get it all right we are about to make a little hit here in storm and I don't know if you guys can hear that Torp Storm sitting there doing her thing but she sounds good all right let's give it some hail dude this road is gnarly I don't get to like 90 right there I honestly I didn't pay attention to this yeah dude I think that was like 90 man I was too busy holy moly this road is like not very straight either I was too busy watching the AFR there you go I watched the AFRs baby gotta watch the AFRs but now that I know we're safe on that oh yes she's running man I want to go back and hit it and see what mile per hour we are getting up to by time we hit this part of the paper now we're just kind of cruising right here and the truck cruise is really good guys it don't make a whole lot of noise inside you hear the supercharger but it's not a lot of noise you don't really notice it too much the good thing about storm is we can get away with stuff like this a lot easier because it's not as loud mm-hmm I do this in frostbite one pass and I already got the cops out here yeah as you can see that road I'm gonna zoom down real quick it's got a pretty good bend in it right when you get about an eighth mile out roughly so it's it's a little it's a little gnarly it's a little gnarly all right here we go I'm ready when you're ready all right hard to hold the camera still yeah I thought it was getting to about 90 right at 90 when it changes to the new pavement all right guys that was a little gnarly especially when you're the passenger I was trying to hold the camera still as possible but this road is like windy up and down all kinds of craziness but we just did about 90 miles an hour down it somehow I don't know but we made it happen but however we can smell the brakes because we had to get on the brakes pretty hard but there you go storm is up running we just gotta get some time and hit the track and see what she does again you know we'll be we'll be stoked if we run mid low 13s maybe a high 12 I don't know if the weather is good enough a high 12 is very doable but we ran high 15s mid 15s high 15s bone stock if we could knock off a couple seconds which I think is definitely possible the truck is pulling hard and we are happy with it no doubt we're happy with it I know Ryan's happy with it static so that's it today guys don't forget hit the thumbs up button like the video throw me a comment down there tell me what you think about the truck and about project storm overall and as always stay safe out there guys we'll see you on the next one


What's good Josh, well we're all back again with another video so I'm gonna check out Triple H, it's back in the WWE Performance Center, Brock Lesnar breaks character, rear ribbly, brain injury and other wrestling news There's been a lot of crazy things be going on this week for wrestling so we're gonna check this out Appreciate all the love and support on channel, roll it to 90k. Let's get right into this one, man It is WrestleMania here, back with another video. It's time for AEW's Go Home Dynamite show before Forbidden Door What surprises should fans expect? Join us now as we look at this week's edition of Dynamite as well as the world's New stories and rumors you need to know including Triple H returns to the performance center Brain news on Biggie, Jim Ross is cancer-free, rear ribbly reveals her injury, Brock Lesnar breaks character after Smackdown and much more Be sure to subscribe and hit that notification bell for daily wrestling videos and follow us on Facebook for Exclusively. Also check out wrestlerlamier.co.uk and an unknown wrestling channel, incredible As always we won't recap the matches, but just look at the good the bad and the downright ugly As always we start off with the good as number one Christians, Khan. Everything came together as Christian Cage revealed He's been playing Jungle Boy ever since the Jurassic Express I have been seeing this. I did see his promo It was fantastic His promo where he talked about How he was playing Jungle Boy. I was getting an easy payday He even took a shot at MJF saying if you want to get paid the big bucks You got to have matches where you know saying people will talk about forever When they start naming paper views after what you've done Then you can worry about the big bucks and if you guys know WWE has named a pay-per-view TLC is a pay-per-view thing as in Christian. They they elevated they took I Mean they revolutionized tag team wrestling with that TLC Concept with them the Hardys the Dullies They took tag team wrestling TLC that they took that to a whole new level So I like that he did that and then he even went mega rogue with what he said about Jungle Boys Father or whatnot and him being dead. I was just like oh wow So yeah, that was very very great him going mega ultra rogue was fantastic From the casino bath Royal last year Christian played the heel to perfection is blamed his actions on the fans for cheering his elimination And of course Jungle Boy for eliminating him Christian went all in on his heel promo Yeah, telling Jungle Boy He knew that the young star looked up to him as a father But that Jungle Boy already has a father and he's dead Oh my god Sure to mention that Jungle Boys mom had her eye on him covering all the bases for a classic heel In the end of things as a luchasaurus showed up to confront cage Only if a Christian to seemingly fast talk his way out of a beatdown telling luchasaurus He's like a son to him number two mox is money on the microphone another money microphone moment from moxley I haven't seen this segment I have to check this out can do both when Sundays match against Hiroshi tanahashi and next week's a blood and guts bow John moxley's promos may seem simplistic as he basically talks about fighting But like Stone Cold Steve Austin his authenticity takes it to the next level number three a string of good segments Now we've discussed dynamite's effective use of promos interviews and backstage segments to forward storylines And and last night was business as usual whether it was Jake Cargill referencing red velvet's injury and the search for a new baddie Tony Storm's quest for the aww women's championship were any of the build for the pay-per-view and next week's blood and guts special number four the bullet club is back AEW certainly sweetened the pop for forbidden door as the young bucks announced a bullet club reunion as they teamed with the bullet club members Against Darby allen sting shingo takagi and Hiromu Takahashi this sunday could this lead to more appearances by the bullet club and aw Number five a brawl to end it all a while brawl to end the show This is one trope that we never get tired with and it's particularly perfect for building pay-per-views Even better reports are coming in that the brawl continued after the show went off the air giving the fans an extra treat No brawl no problem aw also went the opposite direction as moxley and tanahashi who will wrestle for the interim aw world championship at forbidden door Stared each other down after they won their match The contrast was unbelievable as moxley and tanahashi stood tall in the ring while outside all hell was breaking loose And hella hype for pay-per-view aw stepped up with hyping forbidden door showcasing the japanese wrestlers set to compete while also reminding the aw galaxy trademark copyrighted by chris jericho Why they should order the pay-per-view new japan pro wrestling's workers with one exception finally got a chance to shine Something aw should have been doing for the last few weeks It'll be interesting to see how well the pay-per-view does not only because it's being held just a month after double or nothing But because it features a number of non aw stars That was a good one about the baddest number one. Why is willow spray losing? Now although aw did a better job promoting forbidden door this week It's bonkers booking of willow spray has got to have casual fans wondering what the big deal is He shouldn't be losing matches before forbidden door even tag team matches Last night's loss was unnecessary aw's booking is usually solid, but not in this instance number two jericho looking sloppy A chris jericho looks slow and sloppy last night as much as we appreciate jericho's contributions to the industry Something was off last night as a illness injury the ravages of time If this was anything more than a bad night the wizard needs to consider slowing things down Because of the wizard so you can maximize the value works here Otherwise, it may be time for jericho to step away from the ring Well, there was nothing downright ugly about the go-home dynamite as aw hyped the matches going into sunday's pay-per-view While also building things up for next week's blood and guts special They found a way to generate interest in the pay-per-view and next week's dynamite without taking away the build for either show Would you guys think a dynamite this week? Now i'm not sure if we're gonna be live streaming Forbidden door most likely you probably won't but i will check it out Most likely off-camera for you guys and uh, you know, i'll talk about it Afterwards but uh, yeah, i'm not really familiar with a lot of the new japan pro wrestlers But i will be willing to give it a chance and give it a shot You know if there's some good wrestling good storytelling going on in the comments down below Now let's move on to the news Our first story looks at biggie's good news The top of the news today is an encouraging report from biggie concerning the devastating neck injury he suffered earlier this year After a fan tweeted her concern about biggie's physical condition the former champion uploaded a video showing his regained mobility with his neck This is great. That's great biggie and that's awesome fans next up triple h that is awesome I'm glad he's you know Getting back to you know full strength and got mobility in his neck. That's really all that mattered We will see if he's able to actually get back into Uh get back into the ring because i know being able to you know move your neck doesn't necessarily mean you'll be able to wrestle again Because that's a it's a very serious surgery in a very serious situation when anything dealing with your neck You kind of got to take time and let things naturally heal So still wishing biggie a speedy recovery, but that's good that he's on the right path It returns to the performance center A triple h's return to the performance center at least according to post wrestling's john pollock who tweeted According to multiple sources, paul lebesque was in orlando today and spoke at the performance center Of the people I heard from levesque stated he's back. It is unknown what that entails But that was the wording I was given Wrestling cerebral assassin was forced to take time off from his role in nxt last september when he suffered a life-threatening cardiac incident Wrestling news as paul davis added it's unclear what that means But if he's back running nxt then that would be a huge morale booster as a talent loved working with him It's interesting that triple h's return to the performance center following his wife Stephanie McMahon's appointment as future wwe ceo and chairwoman Considering the potential gravity of the wwe's hush money scandal But I gotta scrutinize every move in the wwe regardless of whether it's intentional or a coincidence That could be very good if he's back in charge Running the show for nxt That's that's not bad at all. And actually I did post a poll On uh, my youtube channel. Hold on. I gotta Find it real quick. So I have posted a poll Uh 8.5 k 8.5 thousand of you guys voted should I start back watching nxt? 31 percent of you said yes 69 percent of you said no um A lot of you guys are like, uh, I think I should possibly pass on it But You know the reports if these are true it triple h's potentially coming back and being the guide to you know Help these you know help these young talents out that can that could be a Another way to you know, definitely give me to check it out more Only because I know for a fact when triple h was there, even though it wasn't always the best I think they started slipping in quality Um when they was trying to go I have the wednesday night wars. They shouldn't have did that They should have never Tried to go back and forth with a w. I think they should have just stayed their own thing And did it that way. That's when quality started to dip But there was still a lot of great things that was happening on nxt. So um Honestly, I may I may check it out I may start checking out even if the if it's not true that triple h isn't you know, really fully in control I still may give it just give it a give it a watch through or what now So I may check out the next takeover just for you guys Just to kind of you know, see if this is something that I would be truly interested in getting back into So comment down below. Let me know if you guys think I should check out some more nxt or get back into the swing of things Superstar replacing brian danielson at forbid. Yeah, I heard he was injured As aw continues to deal with the rash of injuries keeping some of its top stars from competing at sunday's forbidden door The speculation on who will take brian danielson's place against zack sabre jr While there are a number of wrestlers in and out of aw Meltzer discuss who he thinks will show up on sunday. I think the betting line guy is claudio castagnoli I don't know that as a fact I mean the way brian danielson talks sounded to me like the way he talks about claudio So claudio's in aw.  You know, he's out. Would you guys think aw will have sabre wrestle? Back to be interesting too cancer-free Have more complications for jim ross as jr updated the fans on his grilling jr podcast about how he's doing since receiving treatment for skin cancer I've got a lesion on my ankle the size of an orange. It's ugly and grotesque I've got a text today from my oncologist. The good news is I don't have skin cancer any longer The wound is not healed and it's terribly painful. I'm going back to see my doctor He's got me on some strong antibiotics I'm taking three of them a day which is strong for me. The whole of famer announcer explained what's next for his treatment He's gonna turn me over to a wound specialist, which I've never even heard of Yeah, I'm going to a wound specialist to see if I can get some relief from this bad thing and expedite the healing process But ross also described the delicacy of his situation walking standing on my feet for extended lengths of times is very challenging Something that's simplistic. I have to be careful and be smart not to bump into this wound I have to keep things covered up and padded up so I don't advertedly bump into something on that wound Which is the kiss of death. My sheets wake me up My sheets lying on this wound when I don't have it covered is not good And we're glad to hear Jim Ross is cancer-free, but we send our well wishes to him as he battled what sounds to be a painful predicament Yeah, man. Well, I'm glad he is cancer-free. That is a blessing Hopefully you can get that wound checked out because that don't even sound Sound enjoyable or comfortable at all Barely touch it graze it. So I'm just glad that he is cancer-free There's a lot of good news from this uh video man. A lot of good things have been happening Wrestling wise to counteract the the negative things that's been going on these past few weeks. So that is awesome Next step of rhea ripply reveals an injury And we go to uh An unfortunate situation was omitted from yesterday's news. I'm really sorry about that But it was just an editing problem And what is going on with rhea ripply? Well, the nightmare answered the question after a knucklehead posted on her instagram that she didn't look hurt But ripply replied can't see a brain injury stop being incompetent and reaching at nothing As for when ripply will be back a meltdown on the situation noting that the wwe doesn't like to mention covid or concussions And that he believes that it's the latter The good news is that melt so doesn't believe ripply will be gone for long Okay, finally broclet. I hope she's able to come back as well because I believe she was slated to face Bianca Belair and money in the bank But now she can't so it's the injury bug is just it's all over both companies It's it's been hitting people in important story lines like crazy like these into like people that are in important story lines So i'm just wishing her speedy recovery as well It's just it sucks that this is happening, you know Lesnar breaks character after smacked down Alas, not least fans may be bored with the thought of another broc versus roman rematch But they still love babyface broc This is evident from last week's smacked down where lesnar interacted with the fans after the cameras stopped rolling Cowboy broc fist bumped the fans at rinkside and generally had a good time Lesnar has obviously been having fun ever since his 2021 return and it shows in his appearances But they have it folks. I'm not gonna dynamite this and I've said this before I've said this before broc lesnar's like His um, what's the word his return the cowboy gimmick It's actually been the best version of broc. I have seen it's been funny It's been quite entertaining And it's it's it's cool to see that he's actually having fun. It looks like he's stepping out of his shale That pat macrophy interview could tell This is a different broc. He's he he doesn't really like people But when he's there, he shows love that's I can appreciate that side of him I just don't care to see the same match with roman no more. That's my only gripe. It's my only gripe Him as his character now I enjoyed it's the best version of broc because he's having fun You can tell he's having fun. You can tell he actually doesn't have a problem being there. It's just a feud I'm kind of over it. The only thing that could save this match is if Somebody potentially cash is in do I think it'll be a fun match probably so but we've seen this so many times There's only so much they could do but who knows maybe they will pull a swerve and surprise us all we will see But uh, yeah, man comment down below. Let me know Um, are you guys excited for Forbidden Door this sunday? Let me know If you guys are looking forward to uh to the whole show What's your favorite match or what's the most anticipated match you're looking forward to Who you think is gonna win? I'm not really well versed in the uh new japan pro wrestlers So you may have to lace me up on that But uh, I appreciate all the love and support on the channel road to 90k appreciate y'all kicking with me. See y'all next week. Peace


Backward compatibility is overrated. Do you know how many jobs were created because of that php7 thing? All right, let's start Let's maybe avoid all the php jokes. I told my friends. I'm a php death now You have no friends php is not dead. Is it split split split? Explode wordpress Joomla Rupal Chupac and a million others. They all can't be wrong Wikipedia and Facebook use php. Well used php. It's a hacky programming language using php allows you to support a hacker culture and Getting hacked it's like saying knife can be used for bad things But does that make a knife bad? No, but on a serious note the web one wouldn't have existed without php and the web 2 wouldn't be as cautious of security issues xam a patchy Maria db php pearl perfect recipe for disaster, of course We use it ma'am Lamp lamp guitar amp. They all lost their job because of cloud We still use a lamp and we're on that php my admin almost feels nostalgic Well, now it's being developed by the community. So we call it our admin or PHP looking for an admin. Some people still use it. Well, some people still use ie6 Object oriented programming was introduced in php3 became usable in php4 and started being used in php5 8 out of 10 websites run on php 8 out of 10 websites are susceptible to security attacks, but now ours is the 2 out of 10 Dynamic types type in ferrins. Well php is not dead There's php 5.6 and there's php 7. We don't really talk about what happened in between Backward compatibility is overrated. It always helps rewriting code, especially in php Do you know how many jobs were created because of that php 7 thing? Well, I got one and I'm proud of it the session is super global with no controls around it the cookie is super global when Using util sometimes the subject is first sometimes. It's last. It's a bit of an art to understand it Well, I still don't understand it and that's okay multi-threaded Single-threaded. Yeah, it has the inherent performance disadvantages all interpreted languages have Include once like why would you include multiple times? Let's talk about SQL injection. Well, let's not get off topic here There's enough wrong with php itself spaceship operator tiny spaceship operator battleship operator X fighters Death Star operator All right, now I'm joking or maybe not who knows in this language Well, I certainly don't if you do use any of them. Let me review your code first. It's likely there's something wrong with it More jobs all this These are mostly just comments is sad yield from and switch go to and my favorite one exit kill die php final underscore underscore is sad underscore underscore dear underscore underscore Vardump is like an evolution of print Vardump Vardump only in php. What does php stand for? power purposeful hyper power language Zen framework Symphony these big frameworks all can't be wrong Django. Oh, that's Python Laravel Eloquent Composer now we're getting somewhere It's like either you use Laravel or you just don't use php Laravel is one of the best frameworks out there among all ecosystems Laravel is a full stack framework by full stack We mean that you're going to use Laravel to do the app routing and the data handling and you're going to use JavaScript for the front end. It's 2022 JavaScript I mean php is everywhere except in all sane services on the internet bringing php back in 2022 or maybe not and you're going to use JavaScript But once you use Laravel, it's allowed to use php and all those things will be in php 9 in 2035 yeah, I've been homeless for a while, but luckily I found a new job. I take off the trash for the neighbors No, I'm not a php dev bringing php back in 2022 or maybe not Oh, it's Laravel 5 won't work with your php 7. Oh, it's Laravel 5.2. It should work with your 7.1 Oh, it's php 5 won't work with your php 7. Oh, it's Laravel 5.8 won't work with your php 7.1 0.2. Oh missing semicolon missing apostrophe Oh, it's actually a semicolon too much in that SQL statement. The die command is my favorite not deprecated deprecated deprecated deprecated deprecated not deprecated but safe not safe but not deprecated You can't really fail a WordPress setup. Oh, man. Oh for good a semicolon. Ah Yeah Cemicolon, let me tell you about Laravel 5.9 But let me tell php devs are not paid badly we see dollar signs all the time PHP is everywhere. It's not going to die PHP used to be a good language and it still is have you heard of Laravel


Roger, saw a copy, five minutes. So where we are right now is in Drogsvik Finland, it's in the southwestern part of Finland not far from the port of Henko. Right now we're working with the Newlands Brigade, which is one of the two coastal brigades of the Finnish Navy, the Finnish Defense Forces, and we're providing direct support sustainment to the Newlands Brigade, and what that means is as a logistics unit we're using the different modes of distribution or transportation to provide supplies and support of the Newlands Brigade to keep them moving as they're conducting their maneuver operations. So as far as being out here in Drogsvik Finland, not only are we operating in the cold but we're also operating in the archipelago, so a littoral environment. So the end state for us and one of the big things that we've taken away from the Finns is how do we work in a cold weather environment that's also surrounded by water as well as islands. So how do we move via boats? How do we connect surface distribution so on land to water? How do we connect our aerial distribution like aerial delivery and external lifts so moving equipment underneath helicopters to islands and then how do we support how we tie that into supporting an element via boat. That's one of the big takeaways that we've gotten so far working with the Newlands Brigade down here in the archipelago. On an individual level and on a professional level it's been great working with the Finns. Naturally everyone has their ways they do things so there's a little bit of friction here and there but overall it's been great. Fantastic people to work with and I'd love to do it again. This opportunity to exercise and to train in this environment is absolutely critical because when we look to not just the future of where the threat is or where we see ourselves operating, Marines need to be ready for that and they need to be prepared. Being here now training this is this is the type of preparation that they need. They need hands-on, they need in-person, they need real challenging training. That's what Marines like. Well the US Marines arrived approximately three months ago and they've been living in a brigade. They have accommodation built just for them in Brigade area where our conscripts are stationed as well. It all has happened very quickly after the Finland and Sweden applied for NATO. It all started we had the first it's called amphibious training event. We had a first event in the summer when the USS Kersak was here and now this is the second training event. We do bilateral cooperation. We get to know each other get to know each other's habits and the way we operate.  It's a whole different culture and their capabilities and their way of thinking is the biggest lesson for us to learn and I've been very very satisfied with the cooperation that we've had. It's been very good.