We will start off with public comments. Oh, first there's new roles. Sorry. Jill. Here. Here. Emma. Present. Amanda. Here. Andrew said he's going to be late. Jerry, I think might be late. We have a quorum, right? Yeah. We have sex. We have a quorum. So public. We have some folks on. For public comment. So we've got 10 minutes. If you understand the raise hand function and zoom. If you have participants. And it raise hand. I can see that you want to talk. I, if you get confused by that, you can just raise your hand in the screen. So for folks, if anyone wants to talk, please either do the raise hand function or. Raise hand. Physically in the screen. One. Beth, and then please. Even though folks can see you on zoom, please announce your name for, for the audio portion. Thank you. I'm Beth Merrill. I'm a parent of a third and ninth grader. I just wanted to first say, I appreciate the addition of the sports camps for elementary school students that I recently saw in. The communications to parents. My daughter has attended an ELL camp for ELL camp, ELL English language, learned to camp for the last several years. And both my son and daughter attended a transition to kindergarten camp. When they were. Coming to union elementary. And I just wonder if, given the severe shortage. Summer camps in our area this summer, I actually teach at a summer camp and it filled up like. In early March earlier than it has ever filled up before. All of them. And if there is in fact funding for more summer programming. That if there might be a way to use those two models of those camps, which are very simple. You know, just kids being together on school property, but socializing just being with each other. More opportunities for, for more kids to do that. I'm especially concerned with. Some of the yellow kids who really, I don't see them in the traditional summer camps. And also just kids who have been remote for the last year. I know three peers of my daughter who have barely left their homes in the past year, they've been their remote students. And I just worry about what the transition is going to be like for them in the fall and just what it's been. And so I feel like, you know, that going to the high school or the elementary school or wherever it would be able to be hosted for a week for a half day camp for them could just make like a huge difference. And it doesn't need to be even a huge theme, you know, I'm running a camp in a where we're reading, reading books to kids and they're doing projects with the books.  And just definitely thinking about those kids who don't get that experience usually. And this year. You know, even parents who are pretty on top of camps, may have missed the boat for camps just given the high demand. So I just wonder if there's a way to look at those models that we already have in place. And hopefully, you know, use some funding to make sure that we're including kids who. Who really could use the extra support. Great. Thank you. Anyone else. Have a comment. Thanks. And I see. The question is, what is the best way to do that? Thank you. Great. Thanks. And I see. Like Mia has joined us. And Jerry Andrew are running late. Let's move on to the consent agenda. Do I have a motion to approve the consent agenda? I'd like to make a motion that we approve the consent agenda. Except for the superintendent's report. I'd like to pull that for discussion of these. Okay. Do we have a second to Jill's motion to approve the consent agenda with the. Superintendent's report. For discussion. I have a question just about the calendar. Is that something that we are actually approving via. Approving the consent agenda. Yes, we are approving the school board meeting calendar. If you want to pull that, we can discuss that as well. Okay. Thank you. Motion crafting. This would be a first. I make a motion to approve the consent agenda. Aside from discussion about. The calendar and the superintendent's report. Do you have a second for that? I'll second that and withdraw my original motion. Thanks, Jill. I'm. Good to vote. Jill. Okay. Good to vote. Kristen. Hi. Hi. Emma. Hi. Amanda. Yes. Mia. Great. The center to pass this. So let's move on to discussion of the superintendent's report. And then the school board meeting calendar. And I'll turn it over to Jill. whatever question you have. Great, thanks. Yeah, there was just one section. I always really appreciate the Superintend's report. I find a lot of really good information. So I hope folks do take the time to take a look at that. And I know that the rules for COVID are sort of in a constant state of shifting by the minute. So I was hoping to get some clarification from Libby about the statement. This is obviously right now the Agency of Education is predicting that the 2021-2022 school year will be back to typical schooling. We expect that all people will be asked to wear a mask inside. And I just wondered if you could get into the specifics of that a little bit, because I know certain buildings may not have elementary school kids, but some might. And obviously, again, knowing that this is several months away, but I just wondered if you could just comment on that or clear that up, because I know a lot of, at least the middle schoolers are pretty stoked who are eligible to not wear masks because they're getting their vaccine. So I was hoping you could explain that. Thank you. Yeah, I'm pretty stoked to take that mask off too. So that comment came from, so I wrote that on what, May 13th or something. You pointed that out to me, Delta. So it was before the CDC made any guidance. And we work, we have a weekly phone meeting with Dan French, the Secretary of Education. And Dan has said in verbal communication many times that he expects schools, employees and students to be wearing a mask next year. Now those are in verbal communications. Nothing is written yet and we have to go by written communication. So that's where that comment came from. I think that they'll probably address the situation when we know more and are closer to that time period. What we do know now is that they're, well, we don't know it, but they're estimating that under 12 will be available for vaccination in the early fall or under 12-year-olds. So that would include our elementary school kids. I can pretty much bet that if elementary school kids are starting or under 12-year-olds are starting without a vaccination opportunity that they will be in masks. As for the upper grades, they are batting back and forth around do we ask for student vaccination records around COVID, do we not? They're batting around all of those big hefty ethical questions right now at the AOE when I say they. So we really don't know yet. But as of right now, what we're being told verbally is that we will be in masks. That could change very quickly. So we don't know that yet, but that's what we're being told right now. Great, thank you. Any other questions on that? Thank you, Jill and Libby. Kristen, the calendar. Yeah, this is probably just maybe an administrative slip that I wanted to clarify. It says that all meetings will be either virtual or a meeting in person at MHS. And I wondered if RVS was still going to be included as a meeting site for school board director meetings. That's a really good catch, Kristen. Yeah, thank you. Yeah, the board typically does every fourth meeting at RVS. So we'll make sure that we get that corrected and put it back in the school board agenda for next time. Thank you for providing that. I just wanted to make sure our community folks would know that there would be a meeting closer at hand at least once a month. Yeah, thanks for catching up. Yeah. Great, excellent. I had one more question about the wording at the top of the calendar. Yeah, go for it. Board members will either all be participating virtually or all will be meeting in person. I just wonder if it's necessary to use the word all. Like, wouldn't there be a possibility as with recent meetings where some of us are virtual and some of us are in person? I'm not sure why that language was on there. We can. We've tried to the past pre-pandemic without a huge amount of success, as Jim and Andrew are going to test to for people in a more open meeting session, being virtual when they had to travel for work or something like that. And it wasn't a huge success in terms of their ability to hear everything. But that was pre-pandemic. We're a little better at it now. And Mia seemed to have okay success at the first part of the week. But Emma, does someone want to propose a motion that we approve the superintendent's report and the calendar as amended with a change that will. Jim, I think Jim, I think Amanda has her hand up. Amanda. Yeah, I just I had a question regarding holidays, like multicultural holidays. If we are taking that into consideration when we built in our calendar for the year, like, you know, like holidays that other people celebrate or are we looking at just federal holidays or are there holidays that conflict? I don't know. I don't know the dates, but like, you know, that's why I'll ask you if that has ever been taken into consideration. I think traditionally, if you can probably answer it a little bit better, it's just traditionally the first and third Wednesday. So it doesn't influence the city counselor meeting, correct Jim? Yes, we have not. That's basically what we go by. And then school vacations. We try to work around school vacations. Yeah, but if school is in session, and it's a it's a first or third Wednesday for meeting, as you know, this the school is otherwise doing business. Okay, thanks. But it's a good point. Joan, amendment to approve the superintendent's report and the calendar with the two changes noted that every fourth meeting will at least will aim to have a RBS dependent housing to get back in person and then removing the language at all. So moved. Do we have a second? Second. Great. Let's do vote. Jill? Aye. Kristen? Aye. etiquette? Aye. Emma? Aye. Amanda? Nia? Passes. Now we're on to learning focus. I'm very excited to hear from several MSMS students on the MSMS new sustainability course. This is always a treat to hear from students. So I'm not sure which of the group is planning to take a lead, but I'll turn it over to all of you and Don and Sarah. Thank you very much. And thank you for inviting us and for having us. My name is Don Taylor. And shortly you are going to meet the student partners I've been working with. I've also been working very closely with Sarah Popowitz, who works for up for learning. She spent a lot of time in the classroom before transitioning to that. And she's been critical for our development and our ideas. And I'm not sure how we're going to go about with the slideshow. I've put the slideshow in the chat for everyone. But if we can have one of the hosts maybe share that. So, Libby is going to share the slideshow and then our students will take it away after the first slide. All right. And yep. So again, my name is Don Taylor and we've been charged or I've been charged. We've been charged with developing a sustainability class at Main Street Middle School. And to do that, we've been working with up for learning and our student partners who've been critical to our project and to the development thus far. I'm going to turn it over to them. And if you could go to the next slide please, we'd appreciate it. The CPS team at Main Street Middle School is a group of youth in the sixth and seventh grade who want to take action for the UNSDG goals in our school system and work towards a more sustainable future along with supporting youth to partnership in our schools. In the corner, these are the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, or UNSDGs. We've been looking at these goals throughout the year and aiming towards helping and solve these problems in our school. There are multiple other schools around the world that do the same thing that we do. We meet once a month to talk about this and our current progress. Is that you, Olivia? Oh, I think Olivia might have... She's frozen. Yeah. There we go. Olivia, are you back? Olivia, can you go over this slide? I'm sorry. My dad's walking in on me. Youth Adult Partnership is a big part of who we are at CPS. We focus on relationships, having youth and adult as equal and mutual partners in our community, and having shared decision-making and responsibility. So, Olivia, I think when you froze out, you... We haven't gotten there yet. We're on our goal slide with the... I think when you froze, you missed that. Did I not go over the goal one? No. Can you see the screen? Well, our goal is to develop a sustainability program model at Main Street Middle School for the 2021 to 2022 school year by sharing our voice, skills, and vision to the planning team. Youth and Adult Partnership is a big part of who we are at CPS. We focus on relationships, having youth and adult as equal and mutual partners in our community, and having shared decision-making and responsibility. What brought our team together? We wanted youth voice to be more prominent within our community and ultimately around the world. We want to educate others on the need for this and how equality all around is important. We plan to create a sustainability class to inform peers on this topic. We've been looking at opportunities to make changes. This is why our group joined this team. My name is Molly and I was interested in a new opportunity to learn about people that are struggling and to create solutions for those problems. Change is very important to me and I think that change will be beneficial to my community. I look forward to taking our work to the next level in upcoming years and I believe that we have a strong connection to our community so far. My name is Olivia and I joined CPS because I could state my ideas and goals and get to work towards them with others who have similar thoughts. My name is Asa and I joined this team because I think it's a great place to work with other people who care about similar issues that I do and also because it's a great chance to work on leadership skills which can be really valuable in later life as well. I also believe that youth adult partnership is a really important thing and so it's been really amazing to work with this group using that. Marie, we're having a hard time here in you. Can you try and unmute again one more time? Could you not hear me? Go ahead. Okay, I'm sorry. My name is Marie and I joined because I knew that there are loads of people who are really passionate about the things that I'm passionate about but they are either afraid of sharing their voice or they don't have the opportunity to share their thoughts on the matter and with this program I can represent those people. My name is Leah and I joined this group because I knew it would allow me to expand my knowledge of issues such as the environment which I'm really interested in and passionate about around the world and what will help solve those issues. So next slide please. So we started our brainstorming process by writing and jam boards and sharing about the strengths and opportunities of MSMS and we also had a brief discussion about the SDGs and which ones we wanted to prioritize in our work. Some of our strengths include good leadership skills and acceptance and some of our opportunities we thought of include a self-sustained school garden and all-gender bathrooms. We attended worldwide conferences to learn about youth adult partnerships and how we can apply them to our work and goals. These partnerships are important to show that anyone and everyone deserves to have their voice heard. Next slide please. We keep track of what we have done and where we are going on the WIPAR map and this has helped us to think about topics such as building relationships, identifying issues, and developing questions. The WIPAR map is the Youth Participatory Action Research Cycle that shows us where we have been and where we need to go in order to accomplish our goals and creating a more sustainable school. We really wanted to engage the MSMS community in this class and just having some say in what goes into this class because we really wanted to be engaging for students and so one of the things we did to include our community was send out a survey with questions about just things that kids might value or want to learn in next year's class or have incorporated. Some of the data is on the next slide. Some of the results we have from the survey 70% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that project-based learning made them more interested in learning. 92% of respondents agree or strongly agree that they would like to design projects that have a positive impact. 96% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that learning about social and environmental justice is important to them. These other pie charts show other data like that. In conclusion, we recommended that our program in class should include a youth adult sustainability advisory community working in equal partnership, opportunities for youth voice around issues we are passionate about, youth and adults designing curriculum together based on our passions and the UNSDGs, community partnerships and mentoring, and project-based learning. Now that we've analyzed the data from our survey, we might ask ourselves what's next? What do we do now? And so from the data we collected, we noticed that the majority of our respondents were most passionate about climate action and gender equality. And with this information, our CPS group has started brainstorming potential project ideas that would fit our community's hopes such as a school garden, a food drive, and all gender bathrooms. Just today, we scoped out and worked at the Feast Farm over by Agway and we were able to weed and help out on the community garden that is at the farm and we saw that it could be a very cool place that we could have for our class that we can have. All right, is there one more slide or is that there we go? So first of all, I just want to thank our student partners. They've basically done and led the project. I'd like to thank Sarah for her support and her work. And if there are any questions, let us know. Yeah, thank you so much. It was super informative and great job, everyone. Fascinating presentation. Mia. That was awesome. Thank you very, very much for the work that you put in to do all that research and the work that you put in to present it to all of us. And I'm curious, I saw, I think the next steps sound great. I'm curious if what you are proposing is that this become a part of the curriculum? It seems like that is the case, but I just wanted to confirm if that's what you're asking or if this is a different kind of initiative. I got a thumbs up for from ASA, I see. So that's really neat. Yeah, this will be a class next year that's going to be taught to students five through eight. And I'm in charge of listening to our student partners to make sure that that class is engaging and as effective as possible. I'm going to do what they tell me, basically. I don't know if you want to advertise that down too much. To further your question, Mia, our family consumer science teacher retired this year. She from Main Street Middle School. And we couldn't replace that position. There weren't any candidates for it. It was our opportunity to relook at what we wanted to do with that fine arts position or that fine arts availability. And so we tagged on to see if he would be interested in leading some student work around what the students want. And so Don's been working with these fine students all year to design a course that builds on the topic of sustainability. So that will be getting kids outside at the middle school level will be taken on leadership to leadership opportunities. And it will replace the what has traditionally been family consumer science. And just can I add a little bit to that, Libby, as part of my dynamics 802, 708 team before the pandemic, we had spent seven or eight years on a green team. And I know Beth Merrill, who is part of the public, had a student who participated in that. And we were working on a wide variety of sustainability issues. And this will hopefully bring it to the entire student body at Main Street Middle School instead of just keeping it within one program. And so we have a lot of experience doing this, but we're very excited about the opportunities that it presents. Thank you so much. That was a beautiful great job. I guess the question that I have is I've been just thinking a lot about, you know, our community members with disabilities and in the gardening and like how accessible it is for people with wheelchairs. And just like if you thought about disability when you were thinking about these goals, just to sort of we haven't specifically identified that area, but that would that's exactly the type of suggestion that we're going to be seeking from the community. And that's exactly the type of thing that we would build in using the UNSDG Sustainable Development Goals where they talk about reduced inequalities and how we can look at perhaps populations of folks who may not be having access to those sort of resources or may not be able to get that involvement and bringing those issues to the student partners and having them think about it and work on it and develop the solutions or the projects, hopefully that will be integrated into the curriculum and into the program so that we can allow the students to experience that sort of problem solving on a community-based issue. Good. Thanks, Dr. Kristen. Hi. Thank you, students. It's great to see just your process seemed really comprehensive and just all the input that you got from your peers and your fellow students to really shape what this course could look like next year is really impressive. Something that the school board has been talking about I think before my time, I'm pretty new to the school board, but is the idea of getting more youth voice onto the school board. And so I'm curious what your experience has been like kind of being on this equal footing and being in these youth adult partnerships that you've been talking about and what that's been like for you. And I know that you're here in part to collect feedback from us, but I'm also interested to hear any feedback from you that you might have and how we might go about soliciting student involvement and feedback. And I'm just interested to hear about how that's been for you all to be in those positions of leadership and making decisions and shaping process. And like Mr. Taylor said, that he's like actually taking lead from you and following and following through on that. So I'd be interested to hear about any of that. And thank you so much for your presentation tonight. It's great to have you all here. Molly wants to answer? Molly? Yeah, I would just say that I think it would be a great opportunity to have like a team that would work with the school board a little bit. I think it's great to have some youth input and I don't know where you could get information from both sides. And I think that would be really important and a really big step for building youth adult partnerships. I think that so far it's been working pretty well in like our meetings. At first it was kind of uncomfortable for some people, I know, because you never really know when to step up or step down. But now that we've learned how and like we've gotten used to it, we've really been able to connect more with each other and learn from experiences. Awesome. Great. Well, thank you everyone. It looks like Mr. Taylor has offered you guys to come back next year and give us an update, which I think we all love to hear. So thanks all for your great work and for the great presentation. I know you had a lot of thought and research into it and you all did fantastic. So thanks for all the great work and this is a really exciting program that we're really pleased to hear about and we're going to be excited to hear the update next year. So it goes. Thanks everyone. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Great job team. Thanks again. Great. And now we have Mara Iverson, who is coming back to do another bias training. So Mara, I think we're a little closer to on time than we were last time. Awesome. I'm excited. Also, I don't want to go on after that. My mid year's resolution is to keep these meetings somewhat on time. That is fair. That is fair. I like that. So our training here is going to be a little bit kind of like the last one that we did where it's a little bit more conversation based and a little bit less kind of like content download. But I wanted to do some really brief highlighting of some of the stuff that we've talked about this year. Because it's been I would say on the scale of chaotic years. It's on the higher end of the scale of chaos. So a lot of the stuff that we did at the very beginning talking about implicit bias, unconscious bias has likely sort of seeped back somewhere. So I wanted to bring some of those principles back up to the forefront. But I also wanted to really focus the conversation on the fact that like, none of the stuff that you learn about just basic what implicit bias is is going to be the stuff that shifts the operation of bias in the world, right? You can learn how to recognize bias in your own patterns. You can learn how to recognize bias in the operations of a group. And none of that is going to shift the power balance. And so we're going to do a little bit of review about the implicit bias thing. And then we're going to talk for a while conversation wise just about the concept of like, what does it look like to genuinely shift power around? What does it look like to lift up and make integral the voices of people who typically don't have the same amount of power and access in the community that folks who have explicit power, because obviously there's a difference between explicit power, a bird has explicit power, right? You all are given capacity by policy, by governance, to make decisions and so that power is very formal. And then there's power that's less formal, right? There's power that is influence. There's power that is the respect that people have for one another, the way they differ to one another. So I just want to be really clear while I'm using 50 versions of the word power. We are a group here that is imbued with like active systemic like category power. And there are some pieces about power that are about access and about resources and having had routine and access to that over a period of time. Okay, so that's rambly and really not clear. I hope that that vague description of what we're going to do is super helpful. And I just want to start with some review of really important points. The first point that I think is really, really important to remind us all of is that bias does not require animus. For you to have a bias and for the system to be biased does not require that it actively and intentionally hates or wants to see a particular group fail or fall. And I think that is a really important point to keep bringing to the front of mind, especially as we as you continue to do the work from here, because you'll notice that most of the work that you've done that is about really transforming power. It isn't you know, Ku Klux Klan level resistance, right? You're not usually fighting a situation where people are actively, openly, explicitly anger, angrily hateful. And so sometimes it can be really easy to be like, well, we have a community that doesn't have a whole lot of like anger and hatefulness. And so is there really bias? So that's review point number one, bias does not necessarily have to do have to do with having hatred or wishing to see failure amongst a group. All biases is a sort of background preconceived understanding about a way of a group of people are or tendencies they have. And the bias piece is shaped by forces that are not individual. So that's the second point that I really want to go to is the biases that we have are shaped by the environments that we're in and we have been exposed to, right? So the media that we encounter over a lifetime, the stories and narratives that we're around, the people that we make close friendships with and connections with, the cultures we engage with, all of those things are the things that shape bias. And if we're gonna we're winding a lot here, but bias is also just your brain operating the way brains are supposed to work. Your job is to change the programming of your brain, because what implicit biases is programming that your brain has received from the environment, from the media, from your experiences of the world that offer your cognitive shortcuts for how to make decisions. And your job is to slow down and to change the kinds of inputs that are happening so that your brain gets a new rewrite of how you need to make decisions and how you need to prioritize and who to listen to and who to bring value to. And a lot of times that's gonna require a lot of intentional shifting. So explicit bias and bias of any kind doesn't require hatred. Bias is shaped by the environments that you are in. And so the only way to shift bias is to change the inputs that are happening. And then a third piece that I just kind of want to really dig into before we have conversation is that you have to, I'm trying to figure out a way to phrase this, folks in the community who raise concerns, folks in the community who are saying that things are still broken, folks who are raising up, did we think about this? Have we done any work around this? Those voices are probably the ones that we should be spending the most amount of energy kind of focusing on. And they are also the ones that are typically gonna demand the most energy as far as considering change. Because it's easier to keep a system going that's always been going and it's easier to keep rules and policies and guidelines and practices and procedures going that we always have had going than it is to completely reorder, to completely reemphasize, to completely rethink. One of the things that I actually got really excited about just listening to the youth right now was that their discussion is, if we all made our entire focus of how we do work together, say maybe those UN goals, it would likely change the work that we're doing. It would likely change power structures, it would likely change where we direct resources. And the youth are already thinking about that reality. So having just seen them, I'd invite the conversation, this is just two cents from having seen 15 seconds of presentation. I'd invite that you think a lot about what work as adults and leaders you could be doing to meet the youth on that particular project from the other end. From the lens of the power that you have and also from the lens of deciding what school is for and deciding what people who are in community in school can do together. All right, lots of ramble. What I would like to do now instead of ramble is I want to have some conversations with you first about personal implicit bias and how we do some shifts around personal implicit bias. Because a lot of this year we've talked about the way that systems operate or how we can make changes in our thinking around the work that we do, if you will. The decisions that we make, the careers that we have, the positions on committees, how we can interact with bias there. But bias actually comes since it comes from your brain itself. It comes from you and your actions and the way that you engage with things. So what I'd like us to do is do a little bit of thinking quite silently. Maybe some jotting down. If you have a piece of paper maybe or some kind of writing utensil, keyboard, etc. I'd like for you to do some writing down what this year that we have encountered or talked about, and it doesn't have to be in times that we all have had together. I'd like for you to think about board meetings in general. I'd like for you to think about issues that have been raised in the community. I'd like for you to think about work that committees have done, voices that you're hearing people, issues that you're hearing voices raise. So do a little bit of writing just for a second about what are some things this year that came up that maybe triggered or pushed on some of your biases, that maybe pushed on, I don't know that I can handle that kind of change, or that maybe pushed on your sense of comfort, if you will. Things that pushed against routine called for a really big change. So I want you to do a little bit of writing around that. And we're going to take, I think we're going to take about three minutes to do some just jot instances this year where things came up that pushed on your personal sense of comfort and your sense of like, I kind of thought this was fair already, or I kind of thought we were already doing the best we could. And I'm not sure how to change it. Does that seem, that may be really not clear. So let me look at people's eyes. Does that prompt make sense to you? Okay. Mark, can you just repeat that very last part that you said I was kind of spacing out for a second? Yeah, no, totally. So you're basically just writing down instances this year that pushed on personal biases that pressed on your sense of what is possible to change. And even maybe how fast things can be changed. Anything that really challenged you personally in terms of this is maybe not a thing that I thought was a problem. And now I hear that it's a problem. And I'm not sure that I understand or I'm not sure where to go with it. Or okay, yeah, I see it's a problem, but I don't know how fast we can really move. Or I don't know that we can really shift the system to take care of that problem. So I want us to just be spending a few minutes focusing on instances where that that call for change pressed on our our sense of can I do that or not. Most people are looking up from their work. So we'll give it about another 30 seconds from here to just wrap up whatever concept you're working on. And then I will have another question for you. So this time I would like for you to think about some time this year, some instance this year, when a call for change or raising of an issue galvanized you and made you think yes, this is absolutely important. And we do make to need to make this change. And made you feel a sense of we aren't going fast enough. We aren't being radical enough. We could make this change more quickly more deeply we could throw more races resources at this thing we could put turn focus or time or attention toward so in a time when you felt some sort of frustration around something that you recognize then heard as this is something that needs shift and felt like there are impediments to making that happen. Even though I am feeling like it is urgent, important. And if I were making decisions, I might maybe reallocate resources, reallocate time, or, you know, have a conversation about how we could totally break up the norm of things to get to the root of whatever the problem being raised is and make real significant shift. So the first one the first question was really like when's the time that asking for change, asking for recognition pushed up against your sense of I can't change that faster we couldn't do it at all or I feel uncomfortable. And where was a time this year that you felt like the need was explicitly urgent, explicitly important and that you felt like you needed and wanted to move faster, move with more definition and you encountered some impediments or some slowing down. As you were thinking about how that change could happen. Looks like everybody's looking up now so that often indicates that folks are done with that whatever recording they were going to do. So now we're going to do our third and last question.  So think a little bit in terms of when I'm thinking about that instance or those instances of times where I felt like things were moving too fast or I felt like we just couldn't make that kind of change. Or I just wasn't comfortable. Where did your values and your driving sense of what's really important to you, what was showing up there, what values, what thing that's important to you. And in the instance where you felt like we really could be shifting more dramatically, more radically, we could make this decision faster, we could move in there are just barriers and blockages in the way. What value or driving forces in yourself, do you feel showing up around that instance? Okay, so most folks are kind of looking up and so we'll give it about 30 seconds for anyone still writing or thinking to wrap that up. Okay, so what I'm going to have us do is I'm going to have and obviously you, all of the activities are always to a certain extent challenged by choice because you can't do work, you can't engage in learning if you're not like, if you're not consenting and willing. So if you're like, yet at no point in my work, are you ever required to take part in any part of the reporting or discussion pieces. So I want that to be something that you don't feel forced to do, but that you feel like you want, you're able or willing to push yourself to share in a space of like, really, it's just willingness.  That's not normally how community change operates very well. So what I'm going to ask is, and we all know that Zoom is a little bit of a weird way to do this because, you know, we're all showing up at different places on people's screens. So what I essentially want is a quick report back from each of you on just the first two things. And I'd like an abbreviated version. So basically what I'd like you to do is tell us about the incident or incident instance in like a sentence or two. Well, enough that people could identify what it is that you are talking about. The instance that you felt resistance to, you don't have to talk about what the resistance was. You don't necessarily have to talk about what the conflicting factors were, but tell us enough about it so that we can identify what thing happened during the year that you are thinking about, that you felt some pressure, some resistance within yourself. And then also a little report back one or two sentences on the issues, the topic, the instance where you felt like an urge forward. We're not moving fast enough. We could be doing this differently. We could be doing this more radically. So I will not call on people.  But as we get toward lots of people sharing, I will probably check in with folks just to make sure that if you haven't shared yet that you get a chance. Sound good? Awesome. Do you see the participants spring because you just want to call on people to raise their hands? Do you want to be able to facilitate? Oh, no. Oh, yeah. I can see everybody. It's a small meeting this time. Yeah. Awesome. Thank you question. Good access question. All right. So is there and you can, you can, if you like, either raise your hand with your physical hand or with your emoji hand, just acknowledge that you'd like to speak and then pretty much right after that we can do unmuting and stuff. So brief overview of the instance that you felt resistance over, brief overview of the instance that you felt urged toward. Anyone feel like sharing theirs first? I'm always happy to make anything so others can learn from our mistakes. The one that I initially felt resistance to was the school resource officer discussion happening in the midst of the COVID piece. And then the one that I feel like I'm wanting more urgency to is really two things. One is just the responsibility for the facilities and the very sort of pragmatic and practical part of our role. But also I think we haven't fully acknowledged the collective trauma we've gone through. And I'd like find some way to make space for that as a community. Thanks. Thank you, Joe. Who next? Yeah, Emma. The example where I felt sort of inner resistance with some of the discussion and training around white supremacy culture, it just started to feel like these problems are so deeply systemically intertwined in everything that we do that it felt it feels overwhelming, like it's hard to start chipping away at it. And then the time where I felt galvanized was around the community coming to us and voicing their concern with armed police officers being present in school. And it felt really important that there was so many people rising up to speak out against having the presence of armed police officers in school. And they were amplifying voices of marginalized people. And that's really important to me. It was a moment of like, really powerful stakeholder engagement. So that felt really important to me and urgent to me. And ultimately, I'm really glad that the process didn't go any faster than it went because it was a great process. But it definitely made me feel a little galvanized. Awesome. Thank you, Emma. Mia. One of the examples I thought of where I felt kind of pushed was we recently received an email from a community member about vaccinations that challenged my thinking on it. And, yeah, I felt a little pushed there. And few where I feel galvanized around the request that we have been getting for increased mental health supports. And around what we learned, I also participated with Emma on the school safety committee and what we learned about the work that the schools are doing around restorative justice and developing a foundation for restorative justice practices within the schools. I feel like we could be moving with more of going faster on that. Awesome, Mia. Other folks to share their instance of interior resistance, instance of interior urgency. And Kit. Now I can talk. Sorry about that. So for the first item or first point, there are a couple of things. The first time I felt that way was similar to Jill talking about the SROs. But there was the other time I felt that way was when it wasn't a specific incident or instance, but it was just a general throughout the year, I guess, or mainly the last six months or so when the discussion was happening surrounding the racial inequality or equity towards the BIPOC communities. And this kind of dovetails with the second one where I come from a very, I guess, humble background financially. And so finances have always been the thing that I kind of gravitated towards the financial long term sustainability. So that kind of resonates with me more. And then my internal thinking, it's always my internal struggle. I always think that the economic inequality plays more part in it. And so that's where my internal struggle, and that's what I feel pushed is when I feel internally that it's the economic inequality that causes the not necessarily the issues, but the problems and whatnot more than the other marginalized group and whatnot. And they kind of go hand in hand because of the systemic inequality and systemic, all those things for years and years and years. But what kind of gets my thinking going is in the, and this might be flawed thinking, but in the community that we live in and the state that we live in does incoming inequality addressing that would that be a better approach than addressing more actively the other inequalities. And so in the similar vein, the one that I kind of feel like we need to push more as well is financially when people were, when we were in the budgeting season, when people were discussing the budgets and how initially we thought that the rate is going to be 10% or 13% and whatnot. So how that would impact economically marginalized people with lesser means, how would that impact them? And then similarly, the discussion about people coming to us with the per capita spending for comparing the schools of the MHS and middle school and as opposed to Roxbury and how that that's impacting. So it's more financial. I don't know if that was a, I was able to express that or not, but that's great. That was really awesome Mannequin. Thank you. Others, your sense of resistance and your sense of urgency. Yeah, I'll go. I struggle for reasons that are very complex with some of the talk around equity, both the magnitude of the problem and also the fact that I think there are some things that are being squeezed out of that conversation, such as, you know, some educational goals. I think we talk a lot about equity and we don't merge them with educational learning as much as I would like. And I'm kind of struggling with how to balance that. And I'm also kind of just struggling as someone who sees themselves as progressive, but also wants to build out with some of the fact that I think that we talk to ourselves a lot about these issues. And there's a lot of people that that we miss or we get very caught up in kind of language policing and, you know, how woke we are that there's a lot of people were turning off. And I think purposefully turning off instead of bringing into the conversation and bringing in meaningfully. And I think we can do a better job of that. And that's kind of, you know, that's that's been been a struggle. And I also kind of feel as, you know, a 50 year old white male, it's difficult for me to kind of express some of the sentiments because I just find myself in a difficult position to talk about. Yeah, talk about how using the term white supremacy can immediately stop the conversation with certain people. Even though that's what we're talking about, and it's something we need to talk about and acknowledge. So struggling with that, in terms of what we couldn't make change quick enough, I just felt just with this year with COVID, just getting just getting to a place where our kids are able to like engage and have, you know, the type of school we want them to, I mean, I think we did a great job with that. But certainly, when there was a lot of uncertainty and a lot of moving pieces, and we didn't know what was happening. And, you know, seeing seeing kids particularly last year, I think really kind of struggled with not being in school like that was the sense of urgency around just getting to a place where we're healthy again, we're vaccinated, we're safe.  That's, you know, it's nothing you could really do about, but that has been like my overarching kind of like, boy, I just cannot wait until we are at a point where we're all safe and healthy again. Awesome. Thank you. I was going to say, I was like, oh yeah, also Jerry. And then I'm on after that. I didn't follow protocol and have my hand up. So why doesn't Jerry go? Okay, that's fine. So my personal sense of comfort was triggered a bit when I think this is more, I guess, some of it is language. And it's very stark language that we've suddenly started to use around things. And I've, my whole life has been, you know, I don't generalize. I don't stereotype. I look at individuals. And it's not, it just really triggers my sense of fairness and respect and justice to, and this is despite the fact that I personally have had bad experiences with police. I don't believe in generalizing about police. I know some officers who are just wonderful people. So it, it's hard for me to deal with the language that we've been hearing. Just to be very frank, when I think of white supremacy, I do think of Ku Klux Klan. So that it's hard for me to say, okay, to put somebody who's, who's not intentionally doing anything bad in that same box. It's really, I struggle with that. And then the other side would just be to action. I'm, I like action. I'm not as much of a talker as you guys might, might have realized by now. I have a strong tendency toward action. And I want to start rebuilding systems, start rebuilding trust. Part of that is also like wanting to bring the group back together, you know, having that one sense of team and community. So that is where I get impatient. I want personal resiliency, courage. I want to kind of focus more on what is the positive vision. And I guess, again, and this might be, I've had my own personal traumas. And I understand that we have to go through that process. But I just, I also, I was raised by in the Midwest and I have that like, you know, let's get through the pain and make and do, fix the problem, just move, move through it and make sure there's a lot of action in there. So I think that's it for me. Thank you, Jerry. And we'll go to Amanda and then Kristin. Go ahead, Kristin. Okay, everybody just do something on my wheels. Go ahead. Do whatever. No, go ahead, Kristin. Thanks, Mara. Yeah, I think police are, you know, haven't been around very long. I haven't been here for a few months, but I think somewhere where I felt some resistance around was, I think it was our last meeting where we had to kind of make a quick vote and moving a decision forward around having a police officer at the prom. And I guess the tension with me was, you know, it's like, oh, we need to just let kids be normal. We need to let them recover. We need to let them have just a sense of just, you know, footloose, fun, you know, moving into the end of their high school experience.  So that was just, you know, kind of having to, I guess, you know, just make this like decision that did feel kind of, it seems sort of like a surface and it should be sort of an easy decision to move through and make, but it actually felt really loaded based on kind of the previous work that had been done, that I think was done in deep and true earnest with with community members. And so it felt like a little bit of a, I don't know if like abandonment is maybe a little bit of a severe word, but it just felt like, okay, in this decision, are we actually being true to our stakeholders into the process that was upheld with them? And I think something that I was urged toward was we heard during public comment from a parent who is the mother of a young man, I think in the high school who has significant developmental challenges and her plea felt really dire and and I guess for me, it was like, wow, do we know what folks are experiencing? Do we know what's happening for folks in the community? Do we have mechanisms to hear from folks? Do we create enough opportunity to hear from people? And how do we do that really well in a way that folks have the opportunity to be heard, but then we also have means to act on the feedback that we're getting from community members? So that just felt really inspiring and motivating and also a little bit dizzying. I'm new to this process and so I don't know what protocol and or processes around community engagement, but her plea just felt so dire and so moving. It was just this moment of like, we have to do something, but what is it and how do we go about it? Thank you, Kristen. Yeah, I mean, just one thing. I think for me, it's a dance around, you know, I think the performative conversation on equity and like the white supremacy training culture and like all this that in my head is like very performative, very, because then when I ask for data for BIPOC students and when I ask for this, there is a constant kind of like, well, don't say that or you can be here or you can be there. So like for me, there is like some resistance around the power dynamic that you talked about before and like what that means when it comes to really being a collaborative member of a community like this. So I think that that has been like what I see is like, I guess, you know, the challenge for me because I come from the different world of being an activist, I mean, in a space of power, it has been when I have to ask myself, when do I have to put myself in my place that people are putting me under. So it's like, here's like, okay, I have to sit here and when is the dance, right? Like what kind of hat am I wearing? So all of that, it actually counters some of my beliefs and values as a community driven person that doesn't speak for herself, doesn't have an invisible army, but that I do have a lot of people that I am in constant contact with that belong to those communities that I often advocate for that. So that is kind of like the different lessons that I kind of bring. And then galvanize, which I had to Google just to be able to get in the right way. I think with the ESR funding and just like the you know, again, the community collaboration, the community involvement, how does that look like and how do we move slow, but fast? And I mean, like many of the things that people spoke about regarding all the community engagement pieces around the police and values and principles, and then how that interacts with the performative equity conversation that happens. And so I think for me that like, so that that's what I bring. That's that's what I have inside. Thank you, Amanda. And anyone else who wants to share a thing before I basically tell you why had you do this exercise? By none. I really wanted to take a moment for I think the the past few years, and especially within the past year, I think we've witnessed a tremendous amount of increasing refusal to see one another to work with one another to understand people's perspectives. And I don't it doesn't happen in the same places in the same ways. But I have seen even in one I mean, you folks read the front porch forum, we they're even in our community are definitely times where where you can see a this group versus this group happening. And you all are at least by charge, a group that is given the responsibility for making collective decisions for the collective good, right, for making decisions that that are going to to really take the everybody in it in a direction of thriving. And it means that you inherently have to sometimes sacrifice some things that you think are really, really important. And it means that sometimes you have to take new views on stuff that you thought that you had already decided on. And I wanted you just for a moment to engage with the reality that you're all of those things that you are that you were the things you feel resistant about the things you feel urge toward the things that you want to change the things that you're not sure about, they're all driven by values that you hold. And they're going to be important to you, right, they're going to feel really desperately important. And when we get to a place that we are we are tugging on the things that are the most important to us, that is absolutely the place where it gets really, really easy to stop listening, or to stop reaching out, or to feel completely overwhelmed, like I cannot keep throwing myself at this problem over and over again, it just never that didn't there doesn't ever seem to be a right answer, there doesn't seem to be a way of fixing it, there doesn't seem to be a way of overcoming the magnitude. So after a year of really tremendous pressures and increasing separation. And some of that is actually good separation like the intensity of people who've never had an opportunity to demand change, to demand being seen, to demand that that things start shifting so that everybody really does have a fair shot that that's had greater opportunity this year than in any other time. But also, the strong strong sense of I don't want things to change I don't want things to shift, especially among people who've traditionally had more power and more access, has also gotten much much much stronger in the past year, especially as like, I think as Joe raised the the pandemic wasn't just a situation that we dealt with like a series of logistical concerns. It was a threat to our interior sense of safety, our interior sense of whether everything is going to be okay ever again, right and that amount of pressure really really really pushes on the your sense of what can be negotiated, what can be collaborated upon, how to do change, how to move away from ways of doing things that have that were structured intentionally to raise some people up and leave some people behind. And I just want to note that we having all of these really hyper intense conversations about fundamentally shifting basically how we do everything amid a time when it feels like all we want to do is go back to the way things were or go back to some sense of comfort or through push pass and get things completely changed overnight so that we can feel maybe a new sense of comfort there. When neither of those are possible you cannot go back and it's not really possible to shoot forward you're going to be in that place of tension a lot you're going to be in that place of balancing I heard a lot of that from you all balancing a lot of I think and feel this way this pulled me in a different direction or this challenged that thing that I fundamentally believed all of that stuff is going to be constant and as you keep doing work combating bias and as you keep doing work taking out power dynamics that really throw some people under the bus it's going to keep feeling tense like that and it's going to keep pulling on really core things in you and it is tempting to push to push to one side and just not find ways to reach across the aisle so to speak or to not find ways to see that there are other needs calling out right even people who are calling for something that you're like I just don't see how we can move in that direction that fast or at all that there are needs speaking there that there are real human needs human values speaking and so I just wanted to get take a pause moment during this meeting to recognize that your job is to hold the tension your job is to always be in that place of mildly to largely uncomfortable evaluating wondering trying pulling one direction or another and that in times of stress that gets harder and harder to do and it can be really really easy to forget that you're that you are working toward the collective humanity of one another and you're working toward the collective like liberation and thriving of one another and that it will sometimes mean giving up some comforts that you have and sometimes mean going faster than you want to and it will sometimes mean going slower than you want to and that all of those things that feel sometimes very frustrating are normal and continuing to engage with that tension continuing to challenge yourself around those issues with the overall focus that like where we are working toward a community that really genuinely does work for everyone that that humanity piece I really wanted to to just make sure we raised before the end of the year was out so that was the purpose of this activity was to dive into the reality that you all are people who have taken upon yourselves the school community and the broader community and wellness and thriving and that that is a tough place to be when we don't all agree on everything all the time and when we're surrounded by centuries of systems that were put into place that really intentionally do make it so some people thrive and some people don't so if this year has felt a little bit like you are rung out and like you are exhausted I just want to raise up that I think that means that in a lot of ways you you all have done work this year that is critically critically important not just to the school system but also to like how we build community in general so I know that's a little bit vague and I know it's a little bit like kind of woo squishy cuddles or you know community holding hands but that's the point that is the point of this particular training was just to get in touch for a moment with your humanity the humanity of the people around you the recognition of the tensions pulling on everybody and the understanding that you will get through the ongoing pulling intentions and balancing by caring and working together with you with the acknowledgement that the systems don't make that easy to do because the systems aren't built so that everybody thrives and that friends we are over time but done now so I hope that you enjoyed our walkthrough emotional turmoil and you're free to go about the rest of your meeting thanks my excellent thank you thank you so much Mara um it was a great exercise um and appreciate appreciate your time and appreciate your timeliness too um so thank you um uh we are on to the next topic uh what is this agenda I know it's the SR update um Libby you want to take it away let me share my screen so the board got this presentation prior to the meeting and I have we have your questions mics here too to answer to help answer any questions that you might have um in addition to the presentation tonight so this is a presentation on just s or two so there's been the cares act there's been s or one there's been s or two and there's s or three that is now known being called our professor I'll talk about at the end of this presentation this is just meeting to talk about s or two uh okay just this is the first two slides are just a reminder of the recovery plan from the education agency of education all of our s or funding should be dedicated to covid related expenses in one of these three care one of these three categories social emotional health mental health and well-being student engagement truancy and academic achievement and success what you see over on the other side of these columns are the agency of education's definition of those things okay not my definitions but the agency of education's definitions of those things and you can there's a link in this presentation that you can click on and get to the agency's recovery guidelines that they have sent to us so just a little overview on s or two in general about 990 000 was allocated to mrps the full application is due november 15th 2021 we have already put in an application um and we can make amendments through november 15th these funds are to be used through 2023 and can be re retroactive back through march 2020 should we want to we don't plan on doing anything retroactively but we could if we wanted to this is a non-recurring it's emergency aid dedicated to covid related expenses some samples from the aoe around usage it would be construction and renovation that are directly linked to part of the recovery plan and what the agency is really speaking to is a lot of ventilation work for the safety and well-being of kids and staff we they say we can purchase instructional materials we can purchase uh we can contract out for professional development for increasing teacher capacity and we could acquire property if we wanted to according to the agency um and we can hire human resources for learning loss so dedicated to learning loss those are just ideas from the agency of education just a reminder to the board and the community as whole our four pillars our theory of growth for um continuous improvement at mrps is that if we have effective systems in all four of these places then all kids will learn at high levels because of what we do every day so you should you've seen this before certainly if you've been on the board for a while you've seen this before so they're collective responsibility and collaborative practices because this job is too hard to do by ourselves so our teachers work collaboratively together as well as our administrators formalized essential learning that we are prioritizing our curriculum so we're guaranteeing and making it viable as to what kids will learn that there's a timely system to enrich intervene and remediate on that formalized essential learning and that there's high quality instruction in every classroom so our budget for the last three years has been based on these four pillars um and much of the ESSER funding is based on these four pillars as well so when talking to the staff and caregivers in mrps caregivers were given a survey staff and we did a small community forum with caregivers they also were encouraged to write into me which many did uh staff we did a staff meeting around that we've talked to principals have talked to their staff um we've talked to the union and staff emailed lots of different ideas to me as well uh these were the major themes that jumped out from both of those groups summer work and play opportunities for mrps students we have a new updated summer camp so if you haven't checked that out lately go ahead and look at that uh addressing learning loss and academic support for students restorative justice training for staff and students social emotional learning supports that include trauma informed instruction which I would rather call resiliency instruction um for capacity building with our teachers ventilation work and old build in our older buildings um outdoor education opportunities across the district came through as a loud and clear theme outdoor field improvement was a loud and clear theme student work spaces particularly at mhs and ms ms there's there's a feeling that there's a lack of that from the staff mentoring programs redesigning school spaces particularly at ms ms and mhs like the cafeterias um student travel and place-based learning put some money in for that that wouldn't be an allowable expense but it was a theme coming through the student travel anyway wouldn't be a allowable expense and enrichment opportunities for students for the s or two there's some constraints here because if we wanted to hire human resources or we want to um hire professional development consultants there's a time period for that and if we wanted to hire people which we did we needed to have this and sooner rather than later because we are coming to the end of hiring season right now um so we had to make some decisions very quickly so that we would know that money would be available for us um and on the flip side for professional learning uh and contracting out with outside services they get booked up pretty fast and so now is the time that people are getting booked up so we had to have those contracts in with outside providers and a plan for that the aoe process in general is plunky for most of these things not necessarily the whole agency's fault because they're getting their direction from the federal government um and oftentimes the federal government isn't clear so the agency of education has to go back and ask more questions so an example of that is what's the difference between construction and maintenance of buildings that's important because if it's construction it's a whole different process an approval process for us in the agency of education than if it's simply maintenance work and one of our pieces is tied up in that right now and then construction timelines we're way past when andrew would be able to contact construction and contact tractors engineers for the spec work all of that kind of stuff we are way past that for any kind of summer work whatsoever um so so that piece came into play with us or two um but it's it's an high consideration for the rsr funding and plus it's really hard to get contractors right now in the state because there's only so many in every school district in the state plus many of us who've been in our homes for so long all year and a half have desired to change our homes and so the contractors are really booked right now also materials that are at a sky high price so there's a lot of things with construction that was a that's a constraint for us or two in particular just some things about data in general around learning i have uh that that literacy audit findings is a link to the district literary literacy audit which is a wealth of information it was done by an a vermont group um that if we have questions might can answer some of those questions for you um by ellen tomsen and mary grace it's hot quite possibly some of the best information and most detailed information we've gotten across our district in literacy so that's the district literacy all audit that each school got their own literacy audit as well um and there but the district wide really spoke to the themes from individuals tools as well so these were the biggies that i pulled out you can look and see the other ones as well but but there's a need for embedded professional learning to develop the capacity for teachers in literacy instruction um in particular a common model for teaching literacy so parents and kids aren't guessing from one classroom to another as to how it's going to go for for literacy work um a system of supports for student litter literacy learning in pre-k through 12 came around that and clear in terms of formalizing really effective practices that's something that fits right into our timely system to intervention intervene remediate and enrich revisit writing instruction writing instruction was a major hole from this literacy audit across the district major hole um and so that was a piece that that pll pointed to us as someplace that really needs some work um across the district in terms of students owning their writing seeing themselves as writers knowing how to write really well and independently starting from pre-k on up and then design a k-12 articulated literacy curriculum and reading and writing which mike is working really hard on and we have a really good plan to get that in place um that's formalized up on our website people know how to access it people know what to expect grade by grade so we're working on all of those things in terms of math um we don't have quite as in-depth data around our math work um however we know that we have to continue our embedded professional learning we're now on about to well we're just finished year two with christian quarter munch which is around differentiated math instruction at the k-6th level um which has been fabulously received by our teachers and has consistently changed practice across the board and we've we've seen a ton of we have so much evidence of success from this practice with christian and then also the system of intervention for universal skills k through 12 so looking at our screening data across k through 12 um we have approximately 20 to 35 percent not provision and grade levels according to those screeners which tells me that we need to have a more robust system of intervention for our universal skill work and then we also need to think about an equitable distribution of human resources because some schools had more math support than others so using all of these pieces putting them together for us or two we've put in for social emotional behavior learning supports approximately 240 000 for that summer programming is in there as well as the community liaison position which we have very few candidates for no social workers which is what we have as a requirement um we do have a couple that could possibly work but they're not social workers um technology needs our student Chromebooks have been put through their ringer this year because of so much use in last year so we need to basically rebuy a student Chromebook for pretty much every student in our district um so we've been working on that Matt Mike and Grant have done a nice job so it's not a huge hit but there is some some work that needs to be done in that we have a ton of student Chromebooks right now at the mhs library it's pretty impressive uh and vermont virtual learning collaborative that's what vtblc is that's for students who are still wanting a virtual learning environment next school year um we have put into us our funds so and then professional learning we had these pieces lined up um to be paid for through a different place and by moving them into s or two we're able to free up some money for some other things because we knew these pieces would get through the aoe's approval process with a with s or two so we put in for the literacy work writing workshop it's a three-year plan through teachers college reading and writing project out of new york city it's a group i've worked with incredibly closely in the past um and that group for year one is going to be working with k2 and five eight the middle level that's directly is related to the needs from our literacy audit in math we're going to continue the work with teachers development group which is a group out of portland oregon they've been working with groups at grade seven through 12 this will be paying for year two the first year kind of got messed up so we didn't have as much strength strength in year one because of the pandemic um so i actually know this this will be year three one at mic that's a typo no just two okay um the pandemic messed things up a little bit there uh because that's a it's a very collaborative model where there's a lot of coaching in classrooms um and it's very much lab design in classrooms with teachers and so because we couldn't do that and there was no travel that made it difficult this year so we're going to ramp that up again next year and then there's money in the in s or two for a board district visioning work for the future particularly facilitating the conversation around what we'll do with our four buildings in the in the future and what our vision is for that piece um in terms of positions we have a dire need for for math intervention positions this is a constant conversation at every budget year mhs uh had no interventionists for many years and so this year we're able to put an interventionist into title one funding for mhs we had point fives but we never could hire them because they were so little so we've put a literacy intervention into our title one funding which is another federal grant thought source and we've hired an interventionist for mhs for math um which one of our goals is that all of our graduates will have any choice available to them when they graduate and our data is suggesting that they don't with math um so that we need to really target that algebra one and two so kids can be successful in proficient in algebra one and two um so that they can reach higher levels of math and access what are the requirements are before your school um and then in addition there was a desire and a need for and more instructional coaching from our administration we have two people who currently serve as math interventionists on our staff who are phenomenal um and so the plan would be to move them into a coaching position one k through six and the other seven through 12 over the next couple years and so therefore we need the intervention we need somebody to fill the intervention role we're also thinking about these positions as moving into some other funding sources slowly across five years so that we can we can keep them over time and then finally facilities we have this is a picture of a one computer it runs on microsoft word microsoft seven it is the only computer that houses the program for the heat and air controls at mhs and if that goes down we will no longer have heat or air at mhs and our our guy tom allen has to override the system in order to make any changes whatsoever so there needs to be significant ventilation work at at mhs um and i put a i put a picture there just so you can see that white keyboard and you know like the fact that nobody runs windows seven anymore i don't think we could even fix it if we wanted to when it broke so we need some work on our digital our direct digital controls at mhs we had already budgeted 100 k of this and one balance if you're on the finance committee you've heard of this before so this 135 is the is to get it all done so we were going to do it over a couple years this enables us to do it all at one shot um so we don't freeze over the next winter or have very hot classrooms or offices over the next winter which tends to happen so that those are the decisions for us or two for future planning the arc s or or s or three the aoe is still very much in the process of understanding the federal guidelines a major piece of the federal guidelines for our pastor is community consultation at a good meeting with amanda and anna the other day to talk about what that might look like and anna being our communication specialist is starting to put a plan together so that we can figure out what that community consultation will look like based on what the federal guidelines are we also for our pastor know that 20 percent of our allotment which is about 2.2 million has to is mandated to be devoted to learning loss due to covet 19 so part of the plan is to move those intervention positions over into our pastor which allows us to have more time and getting that into our local budget and it also will satisfy some of that 20 percent requirement in terms of professional learnings and system development that was already planned for our funding sources for different funding sources for either local or title two which is another federal dollar amount we had already planned for restorative practices work we've we've already signed our contract with the core collaborative which is linked there to talk about belonging dignity and inclusion we already work with joelle van lent and we pay for that for through medicaid dollars joelle is a psychologist who a very well-known psychologist in vermont she just actually did a did a thing for the caregivers group this week i believe um around resilience and trauma met court christin cordemont has paid for out of title two dollars i'm looking at mike for to make sure that's right which is the federal allotment that's the differentiated math instruction curriculum development in all content areas and s e bl has paid for out of local funds with stipend work through for our teachers to do that work after after school hours so we don't have to have subs and then literacy interventionists are already in title funding so there was quite a bit already planned however i i added those bullet points in because they addressed a lot of the community and staff needs and wants from from that list i showed earlier so that's that's our update on us our funding we are happy to take questions great let's do our not go too late let's do about 10 minutes move on to the next couple of topics um jill yeah i just real quick um there's some acronyms or phrases in there that i'm not sure everybody knows and i'm not sure thinking on an education policy geek like s e bl and then universal skills was one of you just yeah always pull me out on jargon always it slides off our tongue so s e bl social emotional behavior learning and then universal skills um and i'll try not to be too wonky here when you're talking about a multi-tiered system of support or what other people call response to intervention rti or mtss the different tiers mean different things so tier one is are the prioritize standards it's every child has access and we're guaranteeing that their proficient in those prioritize standards we're really working towards that tier two is the opportunity when kids need more time that we give them more time in those prioritize standards the the classroom teacher will reteach they'll work in their plcs to talk about it that kind of thing but it's still working towards those prioritize standards there are some kids who who have gaps from skill work from previous grade grades or um they just never got it they didn't have the time to learn it the first time and a priority standard so for instance i give the the example of if a second grader um does not have their letter sounds right that would be a skill that we expect second graders to already have gained proficiency in and so that would be a universal skill for second grade so and so what we're working towards is developing an effective system so the most expert person in the school around that skill will be the person who's really targeting that that that work with kids and it's quick and it's pointed and intentional so the universal skill work is just the core work so we're talking about reading writing math essentially that we're naming and making a playbook for to make sure that all kids have these and the idea is that we work ourselves out of an interventionist job because we do really well with it right um over time we're not there yet okay thank you okay thanks y'all emma oh sorry aniquette is um lindy i'm just for clarification can you talk about the timing of this when do we get the funds what's the process like do we apply for the funds and then get the funds and then go ahead with this uh or do we actually go ahead and then get reimbursed for these what you said aniquette is typically what happens that we get the funds and then we apply for the pieces we get them accepted and we move forward that is not the case with these funds so we have applied for them we know some things are we know most of it is going to go through but we were told by the agency of education because of what i mentioned before the definitions of construction versus maintenance they're trying to figure out if the ddc controls are maintenance which is how we're defining it or are they construction um because if they're construction we have to go through a whole different process um so right now our funds are held up however i i'm not fearful of not getting them which is why we've gone ahead with with hiring for the interventionist positions and things like that and so did i answer your question aniquette yeah yeah just to play the other side look at the worst case scenario if we get denied um what happens in that case the thing that would get denied is the ddc it's not the positions wouldn't and the professional learning wouldn't okay okay and and so um we are basically we're getting these positions and and incurring these expenses and then we'll get reimbursed once they approve right yeah and that but the approved window when would the approval come is it is it throughout because or is the November 15th after that they start looking at it what's the what's the timeline they should approve it when they get the definition of the construction and maintenance they've already told us that that that's the only thing typically what happens like with mike and his title grants mike i don't want to speak for you you want to talk about the the title grants just really quickly how that goes i love talking about the title grant um typically you you enter your investments and you receive feedback pretty quickly from the aoe about those investments and if there's language that needs to change or um something in the function with budgeting so grant and i work together on those um and once you get the feedback depending on the um amount of applications they're receiving they pretty much substantially approve it upon your submission which means that you can act upon it um like they'll say that basically it's good enough to go go ahead and start acting upon those funds and then you get final approval um within a couple of weeks of that and i think that that's a similar process for ESSER funds is even in the same system so i would anticipate we'd hear pretty quickly thanks great uh hello so my question was around um the ESSER 3 page entitled future planning i think it's slide 10 um you have a bullet point that says professional learning systems development already planned using other funding resources and you have among other things restorative practices and resilience and trauma listed there does that mean that we're not going to be looking at funding those things or sorry what sorry they're already funded they're funded through either Medicaid or title dollars or local funding but we would already that's already good to go well good to go meaning like we're not going to be looking at putting more emphasis on that and spending more money for like for example restorative practices was a huge theme in the school safety police relations committee and it was one of our recommendations to bolster up some of that training and maybe speed it up and put more funding towards it and um i see that it was one of the first things mentioned in the slide from staff feedback too so i'm just wondering if it's off the table to consider putting more money towards those things in addition to what's already funded through other means say that it's more of a capacity issue we have the capacity to do so many things so uh should the board want us to do more of something then you're going to have to tell us what we do less of so we have planned for things like restorative practice and like the work with joelle for the capacity that we have in terms of time frame in terms of um you know just meeting time availability that kind of thing so if we add more then that means we have to take something away okay um and then well yeah i'm not i don't feel like i'm totally satisfied with that answer but we can table it for another time i know we're trying to um finish but is there a deadline for the s or three like what is the timeline for that i lost the last part of that emma can you say it again i'm sorry is there a deadline for the s or three applications and that what is that the timeline for those funds to be allocated the deadline is in march for those for those pieces and we have until 2025 i believe for that money to be spent we haven't been allocated that money yet so hypothetically like the question that i asked about potentially finding ways to give more money towards these certain priorities that could be discussed in more depth between now and march um yeah yeah i i don't know how to um go about this given that i know we're trying to do this in a limited period of time but it um the questions that i emailed ahead of time and i saw that amanda followed up with some questions of her own i don't feel like i've been addressed yet and so i don't know if that's something that's worth carrying over to the next board meeting or it would be possible to address them tonight i think you just need to ask them out loud because the community doesn't know what you've asked okay well then maybe i should just look to jim i mean i said yeah um go ahead nasa whether i think they gave the answer pretty succinctly that requires a deeper okay um so i'm curious to know a little bit more about how the community and staff input informed your thinking like for example was there anything that you intended to be part of this plan at the beginning that isn't any longer when you have come to the final decisions or or the vice or the opposite um anything you weren't originally thinking that you've um included um and then i guess the integrated with that question is the one about just what you've done so far to and to um really put the effort into include voices the people we don't normally hear you know bipak folk caregivers of um and kids who are living with disabilities um people who need greater mental health supports but might feel too ashamed or alone to ask um and in addition to what you've done so far if there's anything more you're planning on doing to hear from them i heard that that's it's a requirement for s or three but i'm also wondering if there's anything about s or two um that you have done or are planning to do so we i'm happy to answer some of those questions before i do i think one question that needs some clarity for the administrative side of things is what is the entire board's um perspective or expectation regarding the percentage of influence different groups have on these decisions so people within the system who live within it every day have a very see sometimes have a very different view of what's needed compared to those outside of the system looking in so if you were to give the board now if you were to give each kind of a percent out of 100 what what would that be you're breaking up a little okay that wasn't just me okay i lost looking too yeah i think it was you're asking if we're put a percent on i'm not quite sure what would the percent be a percentage on just to give it a sure hand you know folks who've been pushed to the margins their experience or input i guess waiting it within the all the other considerations that was the part that's what i heard they'll be asking sorry sorry quick quick run to our closer to the modem i almost got through the whole meeting um yeah so if when we're going out to get community input on pieces like s or two where there's no federal requirement for that type of thing so the question would be what's the board's expectation regarding the percentage of influence different groups have on those types of decisions um because people within the system who live within the system every day have very different views sometimes of people outside of the system and so if you were to give each group you know a percentage what might that be i mean i i since my mute button is off i guess i'll go first i don't know if this is the thing that you want to have the whole board chime in on like each person right now but my thought in answering that is that when we design a system that meets the needs of those who are the most vulnerable it is a stronger system for everyone and so if so i would i would wait their perspective very heavily and i also think of it as a little bit less of waiting their perspective and more of it just takes a little bit more of our effort those of us who have the power to be able to hear uh the voices of the people who are more at the margins because they don't see themselves as having as much of a voice as someone who is working for whom the system already works um so i'm just i feel like you know mara made the point really clear and really eloquently in our in our um at the end of our training just earlier tonight that it's like it's on us as those of us who hold explicit power to be reaching out to those who have very little power um so that's more of my thinking around the involving them in the process and going sort of like taking those extra steps to involve their input and a little bit less on how much of their considerations should be weighted in with all the other considerations i don't know if that made it sound a little bit less clear but that's where the question my question is coming from anyway yeah no i think that makes sense and i do not want to get on the radical of the discussion of this because i think it's part of a continued discussion but um yeah i think that's a very well taken point me that it's maybe not about a percentage but about making sure that that all voices are heard in the process is that a good summation i think that's a good summation and also that it i have seen real evidence of when we design a system for folks that are at them who are at the most vulnerable within our system it is a benefit to everyone so if you're asking specifically for like how heavily would i weight the consideration of the needs of folks who are currently more marginalized and vulnerable in our system i would weight them pretty high so just to answer the question directly as well um chris hi thanks yeah i had some questions just around the summer programming i was wondering it looks like it's kind of been lumped in with the community liaison piece um under scbl but it's uh budgeted for 240 000 i was curious what the breakdown was between the liaison position and the summer programming so that's a kind of a basic question but um i also just had some access questions about um summer programming i sent those to um to jim and liby last week and had just i was curious if transportation had been considered and had been built into that i know that some of the programming some of the free programming starts at 9 a.m i know that is like right up against a you know as a start time for work for some folks so i'm just curious if transportation was considered for that um of course i'm thinking a bit about roxbury um families who are a solid anywhere from 30 to 40 minutes depending on where they're located in roxbury in order to get into mott kealier it's a hall um and i also had wondered about um you know some of the free camps like really fun and really exciting and they also seem to require um equipment like you need to be in ownership of a mountain bike or lacrosse equipment and so i was wondering if there was just you know if equipment was a barrier to access um for for youth if that could be made available to them just like maybe like the program rents it on their behalf of just if resources could be allocated for that um and i also wondered about food if like food um was also going to be provided um to any of the free camps um and then also i know like some of the free camps are really kind of more like a nine to one nine to twelve offering which i know is difficult for say like working parents especially of younger kids um so i don't know if some of the funds are available to um subsidize or support students to attend like the full day part two programming um so yeah i'm just curious how like access to the summer programming was was thought about um and how some of those funds because i know it's a one-time infusion i know the summer is feeling so important to um to youth i know the parent who spoke with us at the beginning um and public comment was talking about how we have some kids that have not accessed their peers or their school community in over a year which breaks my heart um working with a bunch of those kids in the district where i work i know that is very real and very true um and so i'm just curious how yeah that group was was thought about and um just trying to increase access and get these folks to tap into some of the great programming that's being planned for this summer so with transportation we work we looked into it with sta which is our best company they do not have the capacity to provide transportation so we looked into it we don't have the capacity to do that um as far as equipment and pieces like that we have a bunch of equipment we do not have mountain bikes um but we do have a bunch of equipment there that kids could access that they needed to with the exception of the mountain bikes um in terms of the timing of we worked as we were designing this we worked with part two to ensure that part two would be available to bring kids over to the camp at mhs and bring them back so we have that set up we've also any family who has applied for subsidy for part two um will be they they're going through the subsidy process to see how much this they they earn for subsidy and then the district is paying the difference of that so people who qualify for subsidies will will be going to camp to part two for free um so that's already taken care of as well um in addition i know beth mentioned the el camp that's not on this list but that is happening this year it's just not on this the summer list because it happens every year and it's very intentional for students with um who are on our english language rosters so it's just it's just a different piece it's just accessed in a different way um then these kind of i think i answered all your questions i think i asked a question about food that is in oh food is free for everybody so yeah food is free for everybody so that if they're at camp they they can grab food from the cafeteria it's it'll be the same as last year i think amanda and then we're going to move on to our final um yeah so in terms of remedial intervention in the summer for kids i know that i'm a little bit confused about looking at the literacy power point and then hearing from the administrators last week um around that there's nobody behind which is you know what i kind of thought was like nobody's behind um and i'm just kind of looking at like i'm just trying to really understand if kids are just taking ESVAC right now the standardized testing how can we gauge or like how was it you know like how how's all the data how's the the data that was looked at to conclude that kids do not suffer any setbacks even though we do have some data even though the literacy report says that there needs to be um that the ESVAC requires deeper analysis um but also we're not disagreeing data so i just have a question about like how we came to that decision and then what remedial programs and interventions are we using this summer for those kids so like i know a number of families who pay for private tutors for the summer um so what happens to families that cannot afford that six dollars an hour a week to pay for that remedial program in the summer so that those are some of the questions i have i still trying to understand what i never saw the the community liaison position and so it was not in my radar about any of that i have a question regarding mental health support systems and how that's included in the scbl plan um i have a question around contractors and if there was ever an RSP for some of the services or if they're just like here's the who we know and that's who we want to hire and are those contractors that are higher are they proven to show innovative ways and cultural competency to include kids with disabilities kids from different marginalized communities um i have a lot is this a done deal is this is something that you decided how how was i the democratic process with the teachers that really gave input um and can we see that you know how that what that looked like and then i have so many so many things because this is so it just feels like it just was thrown and then decisions have been made and then there's um there was not so much of a collective practice or process that we were included in um and that i just had a question around how that worked let me see if i had more um i'm just gonna be honest we can't get all these questions is can you talk a little bit about the data on a slice 11 uh of the of the literacy districts assessment which is how we have yeah the percentages breakdown around um the grades in the literacy our point yeah i just want to acknowledge that those are all good questions there's a lot and we we do not have time to delve into all or even the sliver of them so let me try to do the best to sum up what you can and then let's move on i'm trying to remember them all i feel like maybe the most important question to answer is like how what is the timeline of this and is there any flexibility like i think that continues because if we know tonight that there's flexibility in time then it might not be so urgent to get all of our questions answered tonight but if we know that there isn't flexibility in time what does the board believe their role is in this work i mean i think that's a good question i mean we are not yeah i think we have an advisory role and i think certainly a being consulted role but it's it's it's technically not our decision to make um isn't a budget our role now budget and money is in that part of how we spend our money and how we're accountable to the goals and to have the population that we serve we approve you know the the overall budget but we don't operationally control the budget or operationally control grants it's developed by the administration yeah jill thanks i'll be just real quickly i um i appreciate that question because i think that's really important for us to keep in mind and i i i sort of resent the implication that the educators and administrators who have obviously spent a lot of time on these recommendations and these decisions that are based in really good practice and do have all of their students in best interest in mind i sort of resent the implication that they're somehow not thinking that way they're the ones that are actually in the building every day so i um i'm really excited that we have an opportunity to get this infusion of federal funds which is not normally what happens with education and i'm also pretty impressed that there is knock on wood enough um latitude and the use of funds that we can do some really important work there so i'm excited about the possibility i understand the reservation i understand the the need to dig in i mean i still have five different terms that i'm not even sure what they are but i absolutely you know we have hired and we have empowered um the people who have dedicated their lives to making these decisions on behalf of our students and are doing the work every day and i i just wanted to make it clear that that that is not the opinion of everyone on the board thank you thank you general um mia and then we really will turn because we still have two agenda items on the agenda um i just wanted to try and answer the question directly i also see our role as advisory um and and as a consultant and a thought partner and that's the frame within which i pose my questions is to help the administrators and the staff who've been working on this um really push their thinking in in in doing this work and spending the funds wisely it hasn't it's it's i and it's not that i don't trust that you are i deeply trust that you are making really hard decisions with all of this and i also know you heard a lot from the community and i appreciate that i also i just am really taking to heart some of the stuff that we discussed only a few minutes ago with mara about how we bring our own lens to all of these things and as somebody who is a representative of of the community um i think it's it's part of our role as the board in this advisory and consultancy capacity to be thought partners along with the administrative leadership in order to help um make the strongest decisions possible for everyone in the community thanks for you um school safety and police relations uh community community report um emma is okay i just um i see that amanda has her hand up and i just feel like no we're moving from it on um we need to we need to wrap up it's it's a 50 and we we can have the discussion later but we need we need to go along um so to be clear there will be time for further discussion yeah we can certainly discuss it on the second we just we we need we need to move on i mean we need to respect people's time our our meetings are completely blowing past 8 30 it's not respectful of people in the families i know we have big things to discuss i mean maybe we're gonna you know maybe we can discuss expanding the hour or the meeting to three hours on a regular basis um but we need to be a little more disciplined about time and everyone is at ample ample air time tonight um so we have two more items on the agenda um and and we're gonna get to them and hopefully wrap up by nine o'clock which sadly would be a victory um given you know we we need to be we need to be better about let's just move on then so that we don't keep you already said that so let's do it well okay i mean can somebody does somebody want to project i don't really know exactly what we're asking for here i guess board approval for um this document that was created by committee members um sort of summarizing the work that we did as a way of communicating it out to the community stakeholders so i'm not sure exactly you know what our intention is i know that there was the potential to uh put it in a newspaper there's potential to put it on district um website or social media accounts um but it's just a way for our committee the school safety and police relations committee to communicate out the work of our committee so i don't know if anyone has um the ability to share that document i mean it was in the board packet but just for the sake of orca and the public who are on the call if you have an army you can pull it up right now you can sure okay you should be able to share your screen yeah i'm gonna have to navigate to it it's in the board packet i've got it emma okay let me try yeah thank you there we go and um just the the piece that i would add to what emma just said is that the the um because the committee is a school board committee um we wanted to get to make sure the board was saying and because the board speaks publicly with one voice we wanted to make sure the board was seeing this and saying oh yeah this is this is what we heard from the committee and this is you know as far as recommendations go this is what we're taking in from the committee and putting our thought toward great so i'll scroll since there um so i'm not sure what the motion would look like but i you know i move that we approve um the dissemination of this document great job a second it's second uh any discussion perfect yeah no thanks you guys did a great job putting this together um really sums it up well um let's move to a vote uh etiquette hi jill hi christin hi um amanda hi yeah hi emma hi and with the share screen i don't know if i'm missing anyone in a majority dropped off and andrew isn't here um you got everyone um and everybody should listen to the in the schools podcast no matter what but definitely episode six because three members of the committee are on it and they um did a beautiful job and thank you livy for your thoughtful questions of them it was awesome great now thanks for thanks for doing that um great suggestion yeah the podcast is awesome and it's it's binge worthy uh i don't i think that's a bit of an exaggeration um final board action is the vsba resolution which i don't have in front of you have it in front of you you can um pop up on the screen can you give me a little context around the resolution please yeah let me recall it up um you might find it quicker than i can gen um so every year the vsba the school board is up there you go thanks jill the school board association um asks school boards for what they call resolutions to support um so it's for legislation sometimes it's uh it's kind of just the piece of where school boards want the vsba to go basically um this is based from g collin's school board in ruttland i'm not positive exactly which district that it is called but it's in ruttland um and it's it's coming out of the idea that there is a lot of um um people in the legislature who are allowing public and federal dollars to go towards private schools um who do not have the same acceptance criteria as public schools who do not have the same equitable belief systems as public schools and they're getting public dollars um to spend is what basically this one is is behind so um it was sent to all superintendents through gene collins who's a superintendent in ruttland and um to see if school boards would support this resolution he has very uh oh i guess i think go go ahead amanda he has very outdated language the term handicap hasn't been used for a long time and it has been changed in the in the federal laws too so um i i i cannot they need to change that to basis of disability they need to add a few more if i'm gonna if i'm gonna say yay because um and so what another question that i have is is your is this like it against the independent schools or because what what i'm reading right now is an approval for public public and independent schools right i mean my understanding is that it's it's um making sure that you know largely other religious schools or independent schools that actually often have actively discriminate based on you know private beliefs do not get the same funding opportunities that public schools do or do not use public funds which you know now in some cases they do and and that was certainly i think the easier under the previous federal administration so for instance a you know a catholic or you know uh you know evangelical school that um discriminates against same-sex couples yeah and as a conversation the state house right now the lawyers and all kinds of people are trying to figure out if they can actually do that so i can't seem to raise my you know that i'm sharing my screen i've lost my powers but i think that i think this is getting a new sense of urgency because there was a recent court decision that actually supported some private schools getting um public dollars even though they were clearly in their bylaws and on the webpage discriminatory against um trans students and and same-sex parents and it was really pretty blatant and yet they were allowed to use public dollars and they could discriminate against students for that i i agree with amanda that there's some there's some big gaps in in this does it is a little um exclusionary and outdated as far as that particular sentence i'm sure maybe they're using a national template i certainly support the concept but it is a little unfortunate it's not a little more inclusive of of the immediate i don't i don't see parochial schools um being discriminatory about things about a d a but i definitely see they're clearly still discriminating against um students who are you know um non-binary and other um discriminatory practices than just what's listed here thanks there are there are discriminatory practices with um students with special needs in that they don't have to admit them they can choose who they admit with so that's like my alma mater yeah that's where that comes from so it's if the language is what's holding the board back then i would recommend that the the board right to the 80 the um sorry just told my like bsba thanks yeah and just say with this updated language we'd be happy to support this resolution so i see uh two people have their hands up yeah i was just gonna say that's the anican ama and i have um yeah i think this also falls under the category for me that christin was talking about when we were talking about getting rubbing up against our comfort levels i don't feel like i'm educated enough to vote in support of this tonight i mean i definitely want the the fabric of public's education to remain really strong in this state and i've seen and done a lot of reading and learning about how that is being degraded in other states due to charter schools and private schools so i'm interested in it but i'd like to learn more and i wonder if vsba also could potentially um you know take some time to present to us we can definitely ask them but i would i would agree with liby that i think maybe like table it for tonight and revisit it yeah i was just curious like what the process is from here i'm guessing that the vsba has sent this to or liby i think you just said a superintendent sent this to all superintendents asking for every every school board to vote on it is it that the bsb vsba will requires like a certain percentage of school boards to vote on it before they adopt it and then if they adopt it what do they do with it they just send it to the legislature what's the so what maybe if there if anybody knows maybe this is something we would find out from a presentation from them um what is the process and what are we hoping to achieve i'm guessing in influence the legislators but maybe there's more to it than that do you all get the emails from bsba yes we get those yes so okay good just making sure that you did and then we didn't miss anything there uh so a couple i want to say i saw it a couple months back but i can't put my finger on the exact date i saw it um you got an email from them that said we are taking um resolutions from school boards right so that comes every year um and school boards can write these resolutions you could write your own resolution and basically what it and yes i believe there's some sort of voting mechanism how not being on a school board though i don't know exactly when that happens i think it happens at the bsba board meeting and so um so there is some sort of voting action and the the resolutions that pass i'm not sure how i'm sorry um they would be they are the ones that the bsba takes the time to to lobby the legislature with to make like it's it's basically the you're giving direction to the bsba in certain areas as local school boards and so sometimes they get put in this way where there's one that a board feels very strongly about and so they want it spread to the school boards across the state before that vote happens right at the bsba board letter level to get more support behind it does that makes that's my understanding of the process yeah it's very generalized yeah okay that is helpful all right okay so liby thanks for explaining so the first part of the last couple of paragraphs are the sentences the first part is clear to me the second part is there a school approval process are they talking about the funding um approval process or is this new schools being approved i'm not quite clear about the last sentence says the marvin school approval process um yeah the state agency of education does have to approve both in both i mean public schools certainly but um but they have to approve they have to be approved and accredited in some way by the agency of education i mean they don't have to be but in order to get any kind of state funding they have to be yeah and is that is that approval process like any other approval process or do you get approved once and that's it i bet it has like a five-year cycle there's some sort of a review process and now i'm really reaching back into my um day a week days but yeah there's like one or two people at the agency of education who regularly review these and re-up their accreditation but it's very i would i would say it's pretty cursory hmm and for one so the last sentence sorry go ahead yes yeah i think that i i'm guessing that's what they're trying to get out there that there's some sort of a new standard for that approval process that um assures this kind of accountability and yeah okay um so it sounds like uh we want to um they have someone reach out back to them and ask if they can give further information on the context and also that some of the language is in need of updating um is that kind of a consensus um does anyone want to get that on i think it's would be one of the the sues that would be be probably the person i can take a stab at it that's a good uh um and we is that i wouldn't want to update until i know what it is for you know like if if it's like i would really like to know it's their own well jill do you want to reach out and gotta ask both those questions a little more context and then yeah i think regardless yeah we don't have to support it but i think it would be better because the auditor's office apparently released a report like a month or so back at the end of march on this exact topic as well so i think i think what they're getting at is this has some some momentum between the court case and the auditor's office report about how public tuition dollars are spent um but i'm happy to take a stab at that and i guess send it to you jim yeah it'd be great and then i can just forward it along to um uh to the fba and then you have to find out what we hear we can either move forward with it or um all right excellent uh let's have a motion to adjourn uh a second second uh advocate hi yeah hi jill hi christa hi allanda hi ama i just want to quickly say before i vote i that i don't think anyone was um i didn't hear i didn't share jill's sentiment that people were inferring that they didn't trust the administration um or liby or any of the staff to make decisions about esser funding i just think you know it's such an imperative giant you know influx of money into our district that it feels really critical and important and it also by necessity has to be rushed so it's definitely um rubbing up against my own comfort levels and i think it's rubbing against others and i do think that the agenda would have been probably better planned if that were the only thing on tonight's agenda because i i think it's only natural for a lot of us to have questions about that but there was i i don't mean any disrespect to liby or any of the admin team um in the questions that i posed tonight so with that i uh well i was trying to vote christa have you voted mia hi i i think we're at a majority so let's just i think we did it wrap up okay thanks everyone