First of all, I'm very glad to be a speaker. But as we say in France, we hardly are saying one new French speaker will not come away from French speaking, and we lie. So I am a middle-aged developer, a writer and teacher, and I work for a company in Paris, which supports my DCS, and I wrote some books. And the last one is... This one in French. A quick story for your tour. It's quite an old project, started as an open embedded with open service. Because this book was not starting up at this time, it's much better made. And it varies on the recipient. The recipient is auto-pros-compiled, it's for target... Why? And there is a tour named with made, which is kind of g-made, much better than g-made, but it's quite extensive. As well as open embedded recipient, and it was inspired by the portage from Zhentun, and with any Python. And the real-to-project itself started in... in 2010, by Zhentun, with open embedded, including lots and lots of projects from the... including open embedded, it made 4 key references that is true. GXC and the real-to-to-documentation flashed out the page before. Before your tour, there was no documentation. The documentation for open embedded was... everywhere there was a computer to be done. So, well, there was a very nice book with 4 and 3 pages, and lots of books around the project, so... It's quite complicated to use, but you can find all the variables in the documentation. It's not like Android, because Android is quite complicated to modify and write to have no documentation, except some books from before, but quite nothing from Google. So, there is an excerpt of the documentation with the real-to-documentation, so when you get your help, you get these two variables, and you can add any variable you want, and you can add a variable for your own application or extensions. For example, we talked about Xenobite, which needs a layer, a specific layer because it's quite complicated if people bear with the original preemptive. So, some technical principles, based on the recipe, you can extend the recipe, we'll talk about it in the next presentation. You can use classes, you have configuration files to use files, everything should be in the meta, in the layer, actually, and there is a very few numbers of the midnight targets, that was not the case, so it was a real problem. And with Yokto, you have only two new targets. We have one graph, one in DC-Border, generally it's 96 and an end-prooter. I didn't know the end-prooter. And if you want to add a new platform as a Raspberry Pi, you need to add a meta-spec, meta-layer. So, if you want to provide Yokto for the P3, for example, you get the voting submission, actually it's your food, it's going to be on this graph, you can get the meta-spec-ride failure, but we have to give you a tree. So, if you add a meta-spec-ride failure, you define the machine, and then you build a C4 image, which is called much a micro, and you create a micro-spec, and so you have your program on board. It's quite simple. Now, if you want to use your time, it's much more complicated, because actually there is no official support for P3R30 in Yokto, but it's quite difficult to use, and I don't know if it's really useful, but you will see why. So, there's a lot of talks about your use and your time, I suppose. So, there are two ways, the P3R30 project, which is a single kernel patch, very easy to install. And Xenomai, which is a co-carnal approach with the cobalt, and it's a kernel patch, which is for high-py, and so on, like we do, etc. And for Xenomai, there is a user-space part, and for P3R30, you can use the standard user-space part. It's a big difference. With the new Xenomai 3, you can work on top of P3R30, installed naturally, but I think it's from the specific version from Nex, which I was more of a Xenomai solo, and now it's collaboratively in the main language of Xenomai, but most of people are used to it, because it's much more efficient. So, P3R30, do you share with Xenomai much? P3R30, I was a fork for our Xenomai mix, 3, when it was 3, now it's 10, when it was 3, it's okay. By part of the Xenomai, it's a fork of P3R30, by Fiji Jérôme, who is a French developer, a very famous French developer at the ecosystem. So, the 2nd Gardner is more complex to you, but it is much more efficient. At least it's about subtext, it's more efficient, you can do more on it, depending on the configuration or the touch. But it's difficult to use because the hardware support can be a little bit tricky to set up. There is a specific Gardner interface for the driver, which is called RTDM, because it's a specific Gardner, it looks like a Linux driver, but if you have a Linux driver, it was a Linux driver to RTDM. And there is... its application design could be some difficult because of the regression program. Actually, on Xenomai, there are two domains, two domains, one for Linux, and one for Xenomai, for the real-time. And if you call some system calls from Xenomai, Linux system calls from Xenomai, you will lose the real-time capabilities for the real-time problem. And if you have a big program, it could be very tricky to do. So, RT and the systems. The octo and the root are the systems. It's very easy to build RTDM in root because if you build it in root, pre-empt RT is a single Gardner patch so you are just to have to configure the kernel and to say the Gardner patch is here with the configurator, graphical configurator. And Xenomai and RTDM support have been available for a long time, so it's quite simple to install. For the octo, there is a dedicated kernel recipe for the Linux and octo kernel, which is for Linux and octo RT. With a dedicated image, core and great RT, with a dependent on Linux and octo RT, it's just this... There is only one dependency on the kernel plus adding RTTest, which is a set of tools for testing real-time. But if you check the recipe, the compatible machines are the two immune systems, which is not the choice for real-time. So, you can save just for our tests, for our testing, and it's a great channel for preempt RT, but it's not ready for using real-time. For Xenomai, there is a support in NITAR, the SDK from DeX, which is quite old. And so, it's not very useful today. And it's dedicated to the SDK, which is a specific distribution from DeX instead of Kotlin. Well, so, in the octo, you have a very interesting functionality, which is exactly the recipe. So, you update the recipe, the PD, which is a PD apple, and the most simple example is a splash tray. There was a before splash tray with open and middle logo. And in the new NITAR-P, there is the same recipe with a PD apple and a new logo, which is the octo. So, it's quite simple to change files, to add files, to define new functions. For example, this recipe, extended recipe, activates the IPC bus on the Raspberry Pi, because it doesn't activate the IPC bus. So, we can use this system for pre-empty. Pre-empty is very simple, because you can just to patch a calendar. So, we create a new, a new area, with the address name, and you add a recipe for the calendar, with an extension of the recipe. So, you have to define, of course, the path of the patch. Thank you, patch. Configuration file, which is always a very complete file, you will stand out in the octo calendar. And it will be a plan with only lines, which are these ones, except the whole page, because it's not dedicated to both. Pre-empty can have branches available from some walls. So, you don't have to write a patch, you don't have to get to commit for the active branch. For example, the bigger one, there is a branch for pre-empty. Pre-empty. But it's much more complicated for Xenomite, because you have two parts of Xenomite, so we have to develop for specific player. This one is not really a specific player, it's just an extension of the kernel. Just one word about beta with deep write. There is a logic scanner, of course, in beta with deep write, but it's not really compatible with extension. So, you have programs you want to write fragments or extensions. So, I wrote a new CD for sort of readings, rather by kernel. But it works only for in-creep and the standard kernel works for all type of pre-empty file. So, Xenomite is difficult as you have to patch a kernel with a specific script which is for pre-empty kernel. It's a patch that it sets the settings between 5 so you have to develop for Xenomite. And you need to understand that this file is very difficult but you have to do that. So, there was a bit of Xenomite very awesome. It was really a big part of this. So, I got the current bit of Xenomite and I create a new reading Xenomite that will occur only for a day-by-day read. And the user space PCB which is auto-proof-based quite simple. The most difficult part is to have a specific function to patch the kernel to run a feedback kernel before configuring the kernel. It's only for provide, of course. And this function is executed with a kernel with a hard task. So, the best way is to show you the code because on slide it's not that really does. It's simple. ReparKern execution. So, you run the standard procedure for installing the feedback patch to the kernel. You call ReparKern. And you say to your code to be great then you will execute ReparKern after the new patch after patching to the kernel So, it's quite simple. Quite simple. And a difficult part in Xenomite is to get the right patch because if you have a specific code with a specific kernel from USB you need to get the right patch to run with Xenomite. So, you have to adapt the patch. So, the recipe is the most difficult part of the work. The most difficult part is to get the right patch to work with. To configure your image in the local code file or you can create and communicate in that recipe. So, you need to use the pre-creditor or the command from Yoko. So, you say, pre-creditor of your first batch kernel in Xenomite. The recipe is the name of the document kernel. The default kernel. So, you say to force the default kernel to the Xenomite kernel. And then, you have to install of course the user space part which is Xenomite. The recipe is just user space store. I can show you the recipe but I'm going to show you how to get the conflict and some options that you can use. For example, you have to install the recipe and call the product but I think it is easy. And you can build a specific image of the kernel. Just one thing about the recipe. The recipe is quite specific because the default kernel is built by the Bluetooth. And I use the fake Bluetooth of your that is not officially your type and the previous type. But it doesn't work with Xenomite. I don't know why it should be a problem with real time. So, you have to force the standard Bluetooth of the Xenomite. So, you have to force the default of the Xenomite and you have to force it. If you use the graphic screen the graphic screen is ok but I want to use the graphic screen most of the time. I like how it works. Ok, so, what to do because I didn't test on the recent version of your code and this is to test on your code but most of the time it is done by a user you can get the recipe from Xenomite you just have to change the batch just to modify the recipe to match your kernel definition and it should be it should work I have some questions I don't know that but I can say that I use my Xenomite simple one to other things that I can show you a simple demo Xenomite will be very simple just to show Xenomite and Xenomite will be different because most of the time we have an association where you can start the Xenomite program on the code on the console and start the Xenomite program on another connection Xenomite is a tool to generate memory output from the system I think the logical trend is sending data between the processing so I will sell the the disk so you can see the wasp 4 microseconds so when you start the average you can see the wasp 5 microseconds and if I change if I change for 3m30 I just have to change the crash so you can you can start the cycle test in the RT test the wasp case is on the 5 microseconds to do the way to test to start the average you will stop the average the wasp case to be more than Xenomite but it's quite simple to use quite simple to install when you develop applications it's very simple just write a language, write a code and an application this Xenomite you need I didn't talk about it but you need to be decayed your tool is decayed so you have to develop a specific driver depends on what you need standard real-time and real-time if you need a hard real-time you get if you have been developed by Xenomite and actually my favorite was Xenomite and Xenomite was an amazing driver it was not a software project most of the time and lots of machines I used to have machines with cameras we had a project in Lyon I remember it was a camera we checked and we needed to do that it was based on this so the problem is we have time on this but the problem is network so we switch to Xenomite and we have a real-time camera and there are also projects in this project I can't say a lot about this we have lots of questions but we have lots of questions we have problems for example for brakes test is that the real-time because the real-time you can use but you should need real-time to use Xenomite


Which Jesus are you serving? Because there are many Jesuses in the world today. I don't mean that there are many true Jesuses. There's only one true Jesus. But many different Jesuses are being preached. And many Christians fall into this trap of serving a false version of Jesus. They serve the political Jesus, the religious Jesus, the sin permitting Jesus. I wanna talk to you about idolatry. And as I said, this is a trap many believers fall into, unknown, and I pray that as you hear this message, you would be given the foundation for proper discernment so that you're not swept up by every doctrine, every idea, every version of Jesus that pops up on the internet or pops up on the television or on the radio or through media. I want you to be armed with discernment. I want you to be given eyes to see and ears to hear that you might not fall into deception. I pray that you would be free from deception, that you would be protected from the various different deceptive communications that come across the airwaves and the internet. And I pray that you never fall for this trap of idolatry. You've heard it said that idolatry is putting anything before God. And that's partially true. Yes, it can be true that if you prioritize money over God, that money becomes the idol. It can be true that if you prioritize family above God, that family becomes the idol. Just fill in the blank. So there is truth to that, but that's not the only aspect of idolatry about which we should be aware. How would you measure that anyway? I want you to think of that. When somebody tells you that idolatry is putting anything before God, you have to ask, what do they mean by that? What do you mean putting anything before God? And to quantify that, many times they will say, well, if you spend more time doing this rather than praying or reading the Bible, and that's idolatry, but that's difficult to measure. And if you define idolatry as that alone, you might possibly fall into the trap of legalism. Now, again, there is truth to that. So I don't wanna be completely dismissive with that point. But to say that idolatry is only to prioritize things over the Lord would force you to try to measure that in ways that are difficult to measure and can lead to legalism. Like, for example, if you work eight hours a day, but you only pray one hour a day, does that mean work is now an idol? If you spend two hours with your wife and children, but you only pray for one hour a day, does that mean your family is now an idol? If you sleep for six hours a night, but you only pray for one hour a day, does that mean that sleep is now an idol?  Well, this is why I say that that can't be the only measure by which we judge whether or not we are committing idolatry. And by the way, let me throw this in. Many of you are being manipulated by religious people who are in leadership positions that are trying to control you by telling you that if you don't follow after their schedule, if you don't follow after their extracurricular church activities, that if you don't meet every standard that they put out for you, and I'm not talking about sin, I'm talking about you have to come to this function and this meeting and this event and this service. Look, we should be in church every time we can, but some leaders use that in a manipulative way and they'll tell you that if you don't follow their program exactly, that whatever is keeping you from doing that is an idol. And I pray that something was just exposed right now because I might be talking to you. Maybe you're under a controlling form of leadership that will tell you that if you're not following the program exactly, that whatever it is that's preventing that is an idol.  They may tell you, well, you're gonna have to change jobs. They may tell you, you're gonna have to change schools until you can live your life in a way that matches our program exactly. That's manipulation. And that's not exactly what idolatry is. They'll let me be clear. If you put something before God in your heart, if you prioritize it and you love it more than God, then that is in fact an idol. But again, to try to measure that, you have to be careful. Now, idolatry really, if you wanna get down to the root of it, is a false view of God. Here's how it will affect the time you spend with him. If you're not wowed by the reality of who God truly is, and of course, you're not going to prioritize him. So if we can get our view of God right, we don't have to use legalistic measures, but we will prioritize God. If you can get your view of God correct, then everything else in your life begins to line up. Idolatry is a misrepresentation of who God is. Show me the real Jesus. I wanna follow the true Lord. I wanna follow after the one of the Bible, this Jesus, as the scripture declares. I don't wanna follow after a Jesus that I've created. I don't wanna follow after a Jesus that society has created. Do you agree with me on that? That you wanna follow the true Jesus and not some warped version of who he is, some watered down version of who Jesus is. Idolatry is a misrepresentation of God. Psalm 115, beginning at verse number four, the Psalmist writes this, their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands. They have mouths, but they speak not. Eyes have they, but they see not. They have ears, but they hear not. Noses have they, but they smell not. They have hands, but they handle not. Feet have they, but they walk not. Neither speak they through their throat. They that make them are like unto them. So is everyone that trusteth in them. People construct for themselves objects of worship. They construct for themselves a God of convenience who permits their plans no matter what they may be and never contradicts any one of their goals. They serve a political Jesus, one that shares their every view on every policy. They have their religious Jesus, one who limits the Holy Spirit's power because of their own personal discomfort. They then say that the true Jesus who moves in power couldn't possibly be the true God. There's the sin permitting Jesus. This is the one who winks at sin and allows you to do whatever it is that you desire. Well, still forgiving you, even if you don't repent, well still accepting your behavior even if it doesn't change. Well, doing nothing against wrongdoing. He doesn't judge wickedness. He doesn't judge sin. He doesn't judge unrighteousness. That is a false Jesus. And some people create that version of Jesus for themselves because it sits well with them because then they can still have their sin while still bowing to someone who they believe is the true Lord. Powerless Jesus, many believers sadly are very uncomfortable with the power of the Holy Spirit. And because of their own personal discomfort, they will label moves of the Holy Spirit as disorderly when really it doesn't contradict God's order. It contradicts their order. It doesn't contradict God's preferences. It contradicts their preferences. They attack moves of the Holy Spirit and they attack people who operate in the power of the Holy Spirit.  And they bow to that Jesus. And that's an angry Jesus they serve. So they become angry. They become bitter. They build their whole lives on tearing others down. They don't wanna bring correction. What they actually want is cancellation because cancellation validates their own view and it validates them in the eyes of others. Others serve a Jesus who never calls for trials, who never allows us to go through anything that will upset us. And you know you're serving that Jesus because when something bad begins to happen, you say to yourself, where's God? Why did you allow it? In an almost entitled tone, you come at God saying, why did you allow this? Why did you allow this when I prayed that it not happen? Why did you allow this when I didn't desire it to be so? We say things like, well I've gone years and God still hasn't done this for me or still hasn't done that for me and therefore I won't serve him. That is a God of convenience. And you've crafted this God for yourself so therefore you've created this expectation that the true God will not meet because he's not bound by the limitations of your preferences. He's not bound by what you think is ideal. He's not bound by your opinion of him. And so we become angry, we become bitter because the Jesus we thought we served allows something to happen that we thought should not happen. The rain falls on the just and the unjust alike. The sun shines on the just and the unjust alike. Good things happen to who we would call bad people and bad things happen to who we would label as good people. But all of this as we begin to see it through the lens of entitlement can upset us should we face a trial. Now here's a key thought. Verse number eight, look at this right now. Psalm 115, if this is speaking to you let me know in the comment section. Psalm 115 verse eight, they that make them are like unto them. So is everyone that trusteth in them. In other words, you become like that which you worship. Write that in the comment section. You become like what you worship. Well, it's true. If you serve the sin permitting Jesus, you will permit sin. If you serve the powerless Jesus, you will grow to despise moves of the Holy Spirit and criticize those who walk in true power. If you follow after the political Jesus, then you will conflate your political preferences for the gospel, you'll mix those two. If you follow after the conspiracy theory Jesus, then every conspiracy theory that becomes a trend will become a part of your theology. And everyone who doesn't mention that aspect of the trend, you will label as uninformed. Think about the fact, if you're watching this live stream, maybe you're watching this 10 years from now, I don't know. I don't know when you'll see this. But as I sit here live, we just had an eclipse and I think the next eclipse, Steve, if I'm not mistaken, you said 2044 or 2045, 45. One of those years is the next eclipse. So it's a long way off, a relatively long way off. And I was looking online at all of these different people scrambling to capitalize on the trend that was the eclipse because surrounding this eclipse was this idea that it was somehow tied to end time events. And I just kind of sighed because I knew, and I say this almost every time a trend starts taking off, I say, here come the YouTube videos. Here they come because the church now, the church these days reacts to everything. And the problem is you can't change anything if all you ever do is react to it. How can you change culture if all you ever do is react to it? And in many cases, that's what the world wants you to do is react to it. And so we were hearing all of these prophecies about major cataclysmic events, society-ending events, economy-crashing events that would occur, that would coincide right at the time or shortly thereafter with the eclipse. And I said, because somebody asked me this on a live stream that I was taking questions and answers, I was doing questions and answers, excuse me. And somebody asked me, well, what do you think of this eclipse? I said, here's what's gonna happen. Nothing major is going to happen. And then there's going to be backpedaling and what I call the moving of the goalpost. What's gonna happen is when nothing major happens, they're gonna say one of a few things. They're gonna say, well, nothing happened in the natural, but in the spiritual realm, something shifted that we didn't see. Or they'll say, well, this news article over here, some localized event, that somehow corroborates what we've been saying all along about the eclipse. But I said, nothing's going to happen. Excuses will be made. And then what's going to happen is another major event's going to come. And people are gonna tie that to their eschatology. They're gonna tie that to their doctrine. They're gonna tie that to the idol they've crafted about Jesus. And they're gonna run with it. And then they're gonna criticize ministers who don't talk about it. They're gonna say things like, but you have to prepare the people. I'm thinking prepare them for what? If you think society is ending, what do you want me to say? Why would the message change? The message is the same. The gospel is the truth. Jesus is the way. None of the basics of the faith change just because of cataclysmic events. And if you wanna prepare people, build a solid foundation upon the word. But here's the thing. Many Christians have tied conspiracy theories to their theology. And it's a fear-based theology. So they serve the conspiracy Jesus. Just as they did when Jesus was incarnate and he came to earth, they thought he was going to overthrow Rome. They thought he was gonna actually do something to establish an earthly kingdom. And he completely turned it on them and did something that was outside of the bounds of anything they had imagined, even though it was concealed in the scripture, the prophetic words. Well, today people want the same. They're looking for Jesus to satisfy the needs that come about as a result of their fears. It's the conspiracy theory, Jesus. They tie every conspiracy theory and it becomes one big web of thought pattern. And they can't break it. And there's no simplicity. There's no joy. There's no peace. It's just this tension that they live under. Why? They become tense. They become angry. They become agitated because the conspiracy theory, Jesus, they serve is that way.  Well, if you think God is an angry, petty, vindictive God, then you yourself will become bitter.  What you think about God, please hear this. You hear anything I say on this stream. What you think about God affects the way you see everything, including yourself. If you think Jesus is a sin permitting God, you will think you're right with God when you're living in sin. If you think Jesus is a legalistic Jesus, you will walk in self-righteousness. If you think he is an angry Jesus, you will walk in anger. If you think he's a political conspiracy theory, Jesus, you're gonna be bound in the fear and paranoia that come about as a result of those mindsets.  Choose this day whom you will serve. We construct for ourselves these paradigms, these thought patterns, these ideas about the Messiah and they are not true. Many Christians are falling for this trap. When we read in Daniel chapter three, we read about Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego who would not bow to King Nebuchadnezzar's statue. Everyone else did, but they did not.  When he confronted them, he threatens them with fire, a throw you into the furnace. And they gave a response that I think is just, I mean, let me show you here. It's Daniel three. Let me show you this in verse 16. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego replied, oh Nebuchadnezzar, we do not need to defend ourselves before you. If we are thrown into the blazing furnace, the God whom we serve is able to save us. He will rescue us from your power, your majesty. But I love this right here. But even if he doesn't, we wanna make it clear to you, your majesty, that we will never serve your gods or worship the gold statue you have set up. I love that. And of course, we know the story. There's a fourth man who appears in the fire. Of course, we know who that was rescuing them. They were not burned. They were not harmed. They actually had this whole situation turned around for their benefit and for the glory of God. But they refused to bow. Doesn't matter what you say, I'm not bowing. Now here's the thing. And I pray, just ask the Holy Spirit right now to give you ears to hear. Ask him, say give me ears to hear. I want you to catch what I'm about to say. Very often, we adopt false perceptions of who Jesus is based upon what our circumstances and experiences and emotions tell us. Let me give you an example.  But there's a situation in which you are still bound. And you say, I know God is able to deliver me. But even if he doesn't do it in my timing, and of course, we know he wants deliverance for you. But even if he doesn't do it in your timing, in a way that satisfies you immediately, even if he doesn't do it. I'm not talking about demonic power. I'm talking about deliverance from things like mental strongholds or a depression or an anxiety. Of course, I believe God can break those instantly, but sometimes he doesn't do a process. And so you'll say, even if he doesn't deliver me on my timing in the way I want to be delivered, I still will not bow to a version of God who does not deliver. You know that God is a healer, but even if the healing doesn't manifest right when you want it to manifest or even on this side of eternity, you can say, even if he doesn't heal me, I will not bow to a God who does not heal. In other words, you're saying, I still serve the true God who heals. Of course, he may heal you in eternity, but he still healed you. And in your mind, you have to choose to not accept, not to embrace certain versions of God that fit what you're feeling. Of course, we can trust God even when he doesn't heal. Of course, we can trust God even when he doesn't deliver. I'm not saying we don't bow to the true God. I'm saying we don't bow to a false version of him now that fits that situation. So don't accept a version of God that is powerless. Don't accept a version of God that is sin permitting. Don't accept a version of God that is tied to the conspiracy theory mindset. Don't accept the political Jesus. Don't accept the cultural Jesus. Look for the one true Jesus found in scripture. And even when my emotions, even when my circumstances want to cause me to believe in a version of God that is not true, you say, I will not bow to that false version of who he is. I believe God saves. I believe God heals. I believe God delivers. And I will not bow to any other version. I know the God of the Bible. Even if he doesn't do it in his timing, God is sovereign. He doesn't have to do anything he doesn't desire to do. He doesn't have to do anything that's outside of his will. And we just have to learn to trust him. It doesn't change the fact that he's good. It doesn't change the fact that he's loving. It doesn't change the fact that we are accepted. We will not bow. We will not bow to what emotions say, what circumstances say, what societies say, what the flesh says, or what religious people say. We serve the one true God, the Jesus of the Bible. Father, help us do it and help us to discern when we are way off. Help us to discern even when we're a little off. Thank you for it, Jesus. Protect us. Give us that discernment by your Holy Spirit we pray. I want you to say it because you believe it. Type it in the comment section. Type, amen. Don't forget to leave a like if you were blessed by this teaching. That like will help it to spread even further. And I want to stay connected with you. Make sure you subscribe to my channel so you can continue to receive my teachings on the Holy Spirit prayer and spiritual warfare. Now, I don't want you to turn this stream off yet. If you're watching the replay, I don't want you to click out of the video just yet. I want to present something to you. This ministry is growing. Our media reach is growing rapidly. Our student enrollment for our Holy Spirit school is growing rapidly. And our events are growing rapidly. In fact, at the time that I am live recording this, we are preparing for our first ever arena event. We have to do that because the crowds that have been coming have overflowed the venues in which we've been hosting our services. And we don't want to turn people away from these events. And so as the ministry grows, it takes in more resources that are needed to be able to host these things, the media, the school and the events. And as we are laser focused on this goal to win souls, to build believers, I want you to join with us. Be a part of something that's bigger than any of us. This is a true movement of the Holy Spirit. Nothing that man can conjure. I want you to be a part of this movement. I want you to get involved. Don't sit on the sidelines. Don't say somebody else some other time. Listen, if even just half of you watching this now decided to support this ministry and start supporting this ministry, we would have the resources to, I could even tell you, we could do events all over the world. We could do a dozen a year if we had the resources. But all it takes is you stepping out of faith. Now you may say, what difference can I make? I'm telling you, you can make a difference. You can make a difference because you are joining in with thousands of believers from around the world who believe in this ministry. And so if you've been blessed by this ministry, maybe you've been watching for the past few months, it's time to get involved now. It's time to do your part. Get involved by becoming a monthly supporter. Go to davidhernanisministries.com slash partner to become a monthly ministry supporter.  Whatever you do, I want you to be led by the Holy Spirit. I'm asking many of you to become partners today. Right now, go and click that link, sign up for a monthly gift of any amount. Those monthly partnerships are really what help us to plan for the future. Help us to plan more events, help us to release more content, help us to release more courses on the Holy Spirit School. God wants to use you to do this. Be a part of it. I thank you for it. I love you, I pray for you, and I appreciate you. Until next time, remember nothing is impossible with God.


No further introductions. It is therefore time for question period, the leader of Her Majesty's Royal Office. Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Premier. I've said many times around the province, the part of the people's guarantee I'm most excited about is our commitment on mental health.  And no matter what spin or rhetoric we hear from the Liberal government, we're not doing enough. So I wanted to give the Premier a chance today to respond, whether the Liberal government will match the $1.9 billion in additional new funding for mental health that our party has put forward to make sure we close the gap on mental health services in the province of Ontario. Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Well, I certainly agree with the leader of the opposition that there is much more that needs to be done on mental health, Mr. Speaker. Mental health care in this province is an area where we're catching up. Over the last decade to 20 years, Mr. Speaker, there has been increased awareness of mental health concerns. And that has meant rightly that there are more people who are presenting with mental health issues and that those need to be dealt with. But Mr. Speaker, the remedy that the opposition party is putting forward is inadequate. That's the reality, Mr. Speaker. Over the last 10 years, we've invested $10 billion. What they're proposing is go forward $1.9 billion over 10 years. Mr. Speaker, that is not enough. We are going to commit to more than that, Mr. Speaker, because there is more that is needed. Thank you. Told me what you want. We're in warnings. Thank you. No, don't look at me. Look at yourselves. Supplementary. Mr. Speaker, again to the Premier. Maybe the Liberal Research Bureau took a day off. Maybe the government's own public accounts have an air in it. But I think we all know the reality, and that's that they haven't invested in mental health. Because the stories we hear, the horrifying stories we hear across the province wouldn't be happening if we had a government that made this a priority. You know, the CEO of the Children's Mental Health Ontario, Kimberly Maram, told me that children are waiting as long as 18 months for mental health care. 18 months. And the Premier says she's done all this investment. It doesn't show on the government's public accounts. It doesn't show in the care and treatment that's available in the province of Ontario. And I want to ask the Premier, is waiting 18 months adequate for a young person who has the courage to come forward and say they need help? Mr. Speaker, I'm happy to meet with any member of the PCs, including the leader, to go through and detail their erroneous calculation. Mr. Speaker, we know that this party has a history of getting the math wrong, and they've done it yet. The member from Dufferin Callaghan is warned. I'm serious. Finish. Mr. Speaker, we know that that party has a history of getting the math wrong, and they've got it wrong again. In fact, if you look at their commitment for the next 10 years of an additional $1.9 billion, that is in stark contrast to our very real and delivered investment of new funding using exactly the same methodology of more than $10 billion over the last decade. Mr. Speaker, they need to correct the record. Thank you. Final supplementary. Mr. Speaker, again to the Premier. Clearly the Premier and the Minister of Health haven't actually looked at their own public accounts where it shows the allocations on mental health. Now, the reality is it's easy to attack the opposition and say you disagree with these assertions. But Mr. Speaker, you know, I'm quoting a stat from Kimberley Muran- I'm getting a troll over here if you just stop. Mr. Speaker, I'm quoting a stat from Kimberley Muran, the CEO of the Children's Mental Health of Ontario. You're disagreeing with her assessment. The Globe and Mail just this week wrote an article that is shocking, horrifying, that if in cases of a young person who's tried to take their own life, they don't get to see a psychiatrist in six months. Six months. That's a Globe and Mail article. And so I know it's convenient to pass this question off to a minister I want to know from the Premier. Do you think waiting 18 months is adequate? Do you think waiting six months for a psychiatrist is adequate? Do you accept these wait times for mental health care in the province of Ontario? Minister. Mr. Speaker, that's absolutely not acceptable. That's why this government has made the largest mental health investment in Canada's history. Not what they're proposing. What they're proposing falls far short, Mr. Speaker. And I'm happy to share the math with them. And now I understand why the Globe and Mail characterised their proposal as fiscally risky, economically dubious. The math doesn't add up and I'm beginning to feel sorry for that party as eventually over time. And I'm happy to assist them with this. They will realise that their calculations are so bad and they are so far off the mark that it represents roughly one-fifth of the new investment that we've made in mental health over the last decade, Mr. Speaker. This results in a dramatic flattening of the curve of the increased investments that this province has made. Mental health is critically important, much more important than they're giving it. Thank you. Minister of Children and Youth Services is warned. New question, the Leader of the Opposition. Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Premier. We all know that Gore-Away was among the companies that gained the system for over $260 million of ineligible expenses. And Gore-Away Executive Rob Kulbuk has been at the centre of this latest scandal. Rob Kulbuk's December 1st Resonational Letter states he is resigning as the co-chair of the Market Renewal Working Group, not as a member. And according to the IASO website, he remains a member. Mr. Speaker, why is an executive from Gore-Away allowed to remain on the board given the scandal of inappropriate expenses? The same people who gained the system should not be the ones rewriting the rules. So directly to the Premier, will this be addressed and addressed immediately? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As we've said over the last week, since the auditor brought forward her report, any abuses of the system, Mr. Speaker, are completely unacceptable. And that's why we're pleased that the system operator has investigated those market participants and where significant wrongdoing was present. Present, Mr. Speaker, compensation has been recovered and returned to the ratepayers. There's $168 million of the $200 million in ineligible costs. As also mentioned by the leader of the opposition, Mr. Speaker, there have been resignations from the Market Renewal Committee, Mr. Speaker. The two chairs have moved off of that committee, Mr. Speaker. And moving forward, looking at Gore-Away, Gore-Away also made changes after they found that they weren't complying with the system, Mr. Speaker. They were fined a record $10 million, Mr. Speaker, and $100 million of that money was recouped by the ISO. We're making sure that we have a system that is going to be rebuilt. The member from Leeds-Grenville is warned. They have made significant changes, Mr. Speaker, and the ISO is constantly monitoring. Answer. Thank you. Supplementary. Mr. Speaker, again to the Premier, my question about why that individual is still a member was not answered, but I'll try a different angle. One of the companies in the Auditor General was a government-run OPG, one of the companies amid the scandal. Yesterday, the minister told us that OPG repaid all of their ineligible expenses by 2015. And we know the former CEO was given a half a million dollar bonus the following year. Why was he given this half a million dollar bonus? Was it to keep quiet on the scandal? By the way, Mr. Speaker, it wasn't that the government found this. They got caught. That's how it came out. They didn't find it. They got exposed. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The innuendo that's coming from the opposition continues to just fester, Mr. Speaker. And it just shows that they really don't understand how this system is working, Mr. Speaker. OPG actually stepped forward when they recognized, Mr. Speaker, that they were claiming ineligible expenses. They worked with the ISO. That's why there was no fine imposed by the ISO on OPG at the time, Mr. Speaker, to make sure that they actually recoup those costs, making sure that they can understand the rules moving forward. And as OPG said, Mr. Speaker, the audit did determine that there were differences in understanding what constituted eligible costs under the program, Mr. Speaker. In respect of some of what were thought to be eligible costs, OPG repaid certain claimed amounts after discussions concluded on what constituted eligible costs. That's what both OPG and the ISO had come to a conclusion with Mr. Speaker way back in 2015. Final supplementary. Mr. Speaker, again to the Premier, the Minister of Energy says we don't know how it's working. I know exactly how it's working. This government has allowed executive, power executives, to expense raccoon traps and scuba gear. Yes. It's ridiculous. It's disgusting, Mr. Speaker. And while nearly tens of millions of dollars has, tens of millions of dollars has... Member from Essex is warned. Carry on. Mr. Speaker, there's still tens of millions of dollars in inappropriate expenses that have yet to be repaid. And so my question to the Premier, hopefully the Premier will actually answer this time, Mr. Speaker, is can we get a guarantee that the tens of millions of dollars in inappropriate expenses that have not been retrieved by the taxpayers, that the taxpayers will get those funds back by December 31st, yes or no to the Premier? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. So the important thing to understand, and I think we can all agree, Mr. Speaker, is that any abuse of the system is completely unacceptable, and that's why, Mr. Speaker, we're pleased to see the ISO Act on the recommendations not only from the Auditor General, Mr. Speaker, but from the market surveillance programs and committees that are done both by the OEB and by the ISO, Mr. Speaker. They've made sure that they've brought forward new practices and new principles to make sure things like this, abuses like this, Mr. Speaker, don't happen again. Because we, on this side of the House, want to ensure that we continue to bring forward programs that help ratepayers lower their bills, Mr. Speaker. And that's what we have done as a government. We've brought forward the Fair Hydro Plan, which brought forward a 25% reduction, helping all families right across the province and many, many other programs. But when it comes to these two programs, Mr. Speaker, the ISO has put in place new changes that are making sure things like this will not happen again, Mr. Speaker. A question to the Leader of the Third Party. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Speaker, my question is for the Premier. Ontario's hospitals have been underfunded for decades. Ontario families have been coming forward with heartbreaking stories of suffering in overcrowded hospitals for months now, while the Liberal government has called any criticism fear-mongering. But the Ontario Hospital Association says that that criticism is called for. The OHA says hospitals are on the brink of a crisis. Will the Premier, for once, listen to the experts and take the actions that the OHA is calling for? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am taking, and we are taking this issue very, very seriously, Mr. Speaker. And I do take what the OHA says very seriously. I think it's extremely important that we listen to people on the front line who know what is happening in the hospitals and that we combine that with our own capacity and our own knowledge and that we come up with solutions, Mr. Speaker, which is exactly why we are expanding the number of beds in the system. It's exactly why we put a 3% increase for hospitals in our budget, Mr. Speaker. It's why we have put an infusion of cash into the system, Mr. Speaker, understanding that there are needs. I believe in that same report, Mr. Speaker, that the Association calls for increased home care funding, Mr. Speaker, increased long-term care funding, all of which we are doing. So we take that very seriously. We are in the process of expanding, particularly at this time of year, Mr. Speaker, expanding capacity in the hospital system, and we will continue to work with stakeholders. Supplementary. Speaker, the fact is that this Premier and her Health Minister have arrogantly ignored the experts repeatedly when it comes to hospital care. They shorted the system 300 million in the last budget, Speaker. She refuses to listen to patients and their families. She refuses to listen to doctors and frontline healthcare workers. And she refuses to listen to the Ontario Hospital Association, which has been ringing alarm bells about the overcrowding and hallway medicine since the last budget, Speaker. Will this Premier now finally admit that she was wrong to freeze hospital budgets for a decade and actually invest in the quality care that Ontario families deserve? Health and long-term care. Minister of Health, long-term care. Well, Mr. Speaker, the leader of the third party knows that our health care and our hospital budget has continued to increase year over year. We invested this year between the budget and the fall economic statement and additional $600 million into the hospital system, 1.3 billion over the next three years to decrease wait times, Mr. Speaker. And I applaud the hard work and the advocacy of all of our hospital officials frontline workers and leaders, including the OHA. And I'm gratified that they're coming forward tomorrow to present as part of the pre-budget consultations. Their input and our close relationship is critically important to getting this right. And get it right, we will. And we make decisions like the additional 1,200 beds that are equivalent of six community hospitals that we've infused into the system. That's almost 10% of new beds into the province. We make decisions like that in concert and consultation with the OHA to make sure we are making the right steps. Thank you. Final supplementary. Well, Speaker, it's hard to believe they can get it right when they've gotten it wrong. For over a budget submission says that, quote, an increase of 4.55% in hospital funding will ensure that hospitals have the resources needed to avoid a significant capacity crisis in Ontario's health care system, end quote. A significant capacity crisis. This is what the Liberals have delivered to Ontarians. We know that there are already thousands of patients lining the hallways of our hospitals across our province. And the OHA is saying that without this investment, it will only get worse. Will the Premier stop ignoring this crisis, start listening to the experts and make the investments necessary to end hallway medicine in the province of Ontario? Appreciate it, please. Appreciate it, please. Thank you. Minister. We are listening and we are taking this seriously. What we won't do, though, is take lessons from a party, and the leader of the third party represents the party that committed in the last campaign to eliminate $600 million out of health care and out of education. When they were in power in the 1990s, they closed 24% of all acute care beds. They closed 13% of mental health beds. In total, 9,600 beds were closed under them. But, Mr. Speaker, here's what the OHA has to say in their pre-budget submission. Ontario hospitals appreciate the Ontario government's leadership and continued investment in hospitals, including an increase in the 2017 Ontario budget and the winter plan to assist hospitals and the home and community care sectors in addressing high-patient volumes. These investments will improve the health system's ability to manage the significant influx of patients expected during the season over the next number of months, Mr. Speaker. This is the kind of cooperation that we endorse, we support, and we enable us to make the right investments to build a strong system. New question for the leader of the third party. Thank you, Speaker. Can you see it, please? Thank you. Leader. Thank you, Speaker. My next question is also for the Premier. The Premier's chronic underfunding of our hospitals on top of years of conservative cuts has created an overcrowding and hallway medicine crisis in Ontario. Today, the NDP released new information showing the extent of the damage that this Liberal government has caused in my hometown of Hamilton. Between June 1st and October 1st, 2017, medical beds at St. Joseph's Health Care in Hamilton were operating over 105% capacity every single day, Speaker. Temporary beds will not solve this crisis. When will the Premier finally do something to help people in Hamilton who are lying in stretchers, suffering, because of her budget freezes? Minister of Health and Long-Term Care. Minister of Health, Long-Term Care. Well, Mr. Speaker, we are making the necessary investments to ensure that our hospitals are able to address what are often complex and multifactorial challenges when it comes to capacity. And in some parts of the province, like Peel, for example, or Mississauga and Halton, it's because there is a significant growth of the population. And in Hamilton, Mr. Speaker, we're making the correct investments to and I wish I had the figures in front of me, Mr. Speaker, in terms of the additional beds that we've added to Hamilton Health Sciences, to St. Joseph's as well, to the entire community, to Dzervinsky on the mountain, Mr. Speaker, so that they are able to provide the care that is required and the highest quality of care that they provide on an ongoing basis, Mr. Speaker. That is an addition to the $500 million of funds that we've infused into the hospital system this year alone, on top of $500 million last year. We'll continue to invest in our hospitals, Mr. Speaker. Supplementary. Speaker, this new information shows that on any given day, the St. Joseph's emergency room, in the St. Joseph's emergency room, there are between five and 31 people waiting for an inpatient bed. They wait in unconventional spaces without a call button to even push if they need a nurse and without a proper access to washroom facilities. When will this premier get serious and make sure that people of this province actually have reliable quality healthcare when and where they need it? Thank you, Minister. Well, Mr. Speaker, just a few weeks ago, we added 24 additional inpatient beds to St. Joseph's in Hamilton. We added 30 additional beds to Hamilton Health Sciences in Hamilton, Mr. Speaker. And in addition, three neonatal intensive care unit beds, three additional basinets to care for those most vulnerable, tiny individuals. Mr. Speaker, we are making the correct investments. We know as well when we look from third-party information that we receive that our wait times in hospitals in emergency rooms continue to go down despite an increased population. We're seeing that objective third-party data. And in fact, as I referenced last week, the report from the Fraser Institute, which says that Ontario has the best wait times in the country, Mr. Speaker. Thank you to the final supplementary. On August 10th, 2017, St. Joseph's Hospital reached the alarmingly high occupancy rate of 139 percent. 139 percent. In fact, the OHA says that this is not uncommon in our hospitals across Ontario. In fact, it says that half of Ontario's hospitals were operating above 100 percent capacity this summer. These numbers represent real people in my community and all across Ontario who have been forced to get medical care from a hospital that is severely underfunded and overcrowded. Temporary beds, many of which are not in place yet, are simply not enough to begin fixing the decades of damage done by Conservative and Liberal cuts and the OHA agrees, Speaker. Why is this premier? Why is she letting the people of Ontario go down? Why is she letting them continue to suffer in overcrowded hospitals? Thank you, Minister. Well, Mr. Speaker, many people believe that the best illustration of a party's actions are to look at their actions in the past, Mr. Speaker, and look at their record. It's there for all to see. And from 1990 to 1995, there were awful years for Ontario's healthcare system because they closed 24 a quarter of all of the acute care beds in this province. And I am even embarrassed to say as well for them that they closed 13 percent of the mental health beds in the province and collectively coming close to a PC record when they were in power, when the PCs closed 10,000 hospital beds, the NDP in five short years were responsible for closing 9,600 beds. We have added beds to the healthcare system. We have done that over the past years. We continue to do that this year. We will continue to make those important investments going forward. Thank you. New question to the member from Bruce Gray. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care. The Auditor General's 2017 report states that the backlog of complaints and critical incidents from care homes requiring inspection keeps increasing. This year the backlog jumped to 3,370 from 2800 last year. Minister, despite promises to fix the critical incidents, backlog, we are not seeing the improvement. Sadly, the backlog is actually increased by 80%. I want to know is the fact that you are not acting on critical inspections a sign that our senior safety and security is not a priority for your government. Good question. Mr. Speaker, it absolutely is a priority for this government. Apparently it is not a priority for that party because just yesterday they voted against our legislation that will be creating enhanced oversight and accountability and inspection and fines. All of those measures which are critically important to ensure that our loved ones and Ontarians who call long-term care their home who are residents of long-term care that they receive the highest quality care and the best supports. They voted just 24 hours ago against a whole set of measures that will fortunately, because it passed despite their opposition that it will dramatically enhance the inspection powers and the punitive measures that we can place on those most egregious homes that do need to improve the care that is being provided. Mr. Speaker, they did no inspections at all of long-term care homes. In fact, 100% of our homes. Thank you. Do you see it, please? Do you see it, please? Thank you. Supplementary. Mr. Speaker, back to the Minister of Health. Must be an election in looming in the near future because for 14 years you've done nothing for that sector. Delays in complaint inspections and critical incident inspections can place seniors in long-term care homes at risk. I think it's completely unacceptable that you are not meeting your promise goals in light of the high-profile cases of abuse and the public inquiry into murders in long-term care homes. Families with loved ones in care have a right to expect that the safety and care of their patients will be your utmost priority. They want to see increased scrutiny. They want to see you making a difference, Minister. Will the Minister address the lingering questions around the safety, security and well-being of seniors by appearing before the public inquiry in the long-term care? Thank you, Minister. Mr. Speaker, the justice I am again gratified she met and heard from the families and loved ones of the victims of this horrible tragedy just yesterday and will be making her decision over the coming month or so in terms of their participation in this inquiry. But, Mr. Speaker, I have to get back to their bad math. So we've budgeted for 5,000 beds over the next four years, $380 million. They're proposing to create three times as many long-term care beds, but they've only budgeted $77 million. Three times as many beds one-fifth the amount that it's going to cost. So it costs about $60,000 per long-term care bed per year to operate that bad, Mr. Speaker. They've budgeted a measly $5,000. The member from Elgin Middlesex London is warned and I'm not happy with what he said. You have a wrap-up sentence? Mr. Speaker, again, the math of their proposals is so bad and I'm going to be happy to reveal it to them and I'm happy to explain it to them because they need to understand the lack of their commitment. Thank you. New question? The member from London West. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Speaker, throughout five long weeks of the college strike, this Liberal government assured students that they would not lose their semester. Yesterday we learned that more than 25,000 full-time college students, about one in ten have not only lost their semester, they have lost their dreams of a college education after being forced to drop out to get their tuition refunded. We know that more students will likely drop out after attempting to complete the condensed semester. As I have stated before, sections four and five of the Ontario Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Act allow the government to intervene in college affairs when it is in the public interest. Speaker, why did this government refuse to act? To prevent the lives of more than 25,000 full-time students from being completely derailed. Can you say it please? Can you say it please? Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I know that no one in this legislature is happy that there are students who have made the choice to leave college. I say to the 90% of students who are back in the classroom, I know that they are working hard and I hope that it goes well for them. I also say to the students who felt that they needed to withdraw and have received support by getting their tuition refunded, which I think we can agree is the fair thing to do. I say to those students, Mr. Speaker, I hope they will work with their college and I hope that they will find a way back into the system and certainly it would be my expectation, our expectation that colleges will be reaching out to those students and helping them to see the path back. Mr. Speaker, to the 90% of students who are back in college, I wish them well and to the rest I hope that they will find their way back in January, Mr. Speaker. Supplementary. Again to the Premier, the regular retention rate for a college term is 98%. In other words, just two out of 100 students choose not to complete their semester. After delaying the release of the tuition refund numbers, full-time college students won't be completing their term. What we don't know is the number of part-time students who have opted to drop out, raising questions about how much worse the part-time numbers might be. Speaker, Ontarians deserve to know the total number of students who have been forced to put their lives on hold or give up their dreams because of this government's inaction. Will the Premier tell the people of Ontario how many part-time students received a tuition refund and what the plan is to get both full-time and part-time students back on track? Thank you. Advanced Education Skills Development. For Advanced Education Skills Development. Well, Speaker, I just have to say every step of the way in getting students back into the classroom was blocked by that party. Those of us who were in this house debating back-to-work legislation, Speaker, remember the House Leader, the NDP House Leader every chance we had to get students back. Remember what he said? No. Finish, please. So, Speaker, whether it was not supporting free tuition for one-third of our students, Speaker. Member from the Tobacco North is warned. Or whether it was getting back students back to work after the strike, back to school after the strike, all heard from that party was no. Any questions? Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Health and Long-term Care and considers this government's extraordinary commitment and developments in mental health. Speaker, as a physician himself, I know that the Minister of Health has a deep guiding understanding of what mental health is all about. We in medical school, one of the first things we're ever taught in Latin is mens sana in corpore sana, a sound mind in a sound body. And I know from my many, many corridor consultations with the Minister and the fact that we sit at the same table, by the way, at caucus, that he has personally treated patients with anxiety, depression, panic attack, post-traumatic stress disorder and so many other disorders. And I know that he has the background, history, stamina, partnerships, and the dedicated workforce to deliver on the type of health care that Premier Nguyen, herself, a daughter of physician, demands for the people of Ontario. So my question is that... Can the Minister of Health and Long-term Care please inform this House about the important investments our government is making in mental health across the province? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I know that the Minister of Health and Mental Health are two sides of the same coin. There can't be one without the other, Mr. Speaker. And I want to start off by saying how proud I am and how far we have come as a province, all parties in this legislature have pushed past the stigma and we all agree that together we need to do more. And it's important to take a moment to appreciate how all Ontarians will benefit from that. Now the Conservatives have come to the table offering an average of $191 million over 10 years, Mr. Speaker, but they forgot that before you announce an increase you have to replace the base from the previous year, Mr. Speaker. I know as a province we can do better. We can work together to truly build the system, reduce wait times and offer more services. Mr. Speaker, while the party opposite has come forward with $1.9 billion over 10 years, this team has put $10 billion more into the system since 2008 and a Liberal government will put $1.9 billion forward in investments in mental health over the next 10 years. Thank you, Speaker. And once again, I thank the Minister of Health for not only the answer today, but for his, as I said, abiding commitment to mental health along with physical and emotional health. Speaker, as you will know, he's a physician who has dealt with these issues on a one-to-one basis as a public health physician on a system-wide as a public health physician, as recognized internationally for his efforts in Africa with War Child for 10 years and he's been recognized, as you know, and now running the entire show in the province of Ontario. As Gail Zucker, CEO of Addictions in Mental Health Ontario, was quoted in the Goldman Mail today, excellent mental health care is available from health professionals other than psychiatrists, social workers, psychologists, psychotherapists, mental healers, a magician, experiences of extreme mental health. Also in Ontario and publicly funded community mental health and addiction agencies. Speaker, we are a long way from hula hoods. Minister, can you just tell us again what it is our government doing to further under your stewardship build up the mental health system of the province of Ontario? Mr. Speaker, we're working with experts and stakeholders and and truly needed. And a key role of mine as Minister of Health in working with the Premier and this caucus is to put those necessary resources forward. Those resources like cognitive behavioural therapy, which will provide more than 100,000 Ontarians living with conditions such as anxiety and depression, with more access to community-based structured psychotherapy services. Or our youth wellness hubs, Mr Speaker, where young people aged 12 to 25 can find walk-in, one-stop access to mental health and addiction services, and other health social and employment supports. Or creating more supportive housing, where this year up to 1,150 additional supportive housing units will be added on top of the 1,000 new units added over the last three years to help reduce homelessness and improve supports, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. New question? The member from Hella-Burden-Burden-Burden-Burden-Burden-Burden-Burden-Burden-Burden. My question is to the Attorney General. Victim service organisations across the province are absolutely overwhelmed with requests for their services. Many are struggling to keep up with the sheer numbers, all while dealing with more complex cases, including victims of human sex trafficking. Halburden-Cortha Victim Services in my writing received just $18,000 to hire someone under the Victim Quick Response Program last year. That was barely enough to hire even half a person. They made the most of it and helped dozens of trafficking victims. Unfortunately, this paltry amount was only one-time funding. They won't be able to continue their important work next year without a clear commitment from this government. So my question to the minister is, will he assure Hella-Burden-Cortha Victim Services that they will have the funding they need to help human sex trafficking victims in the new year? Good question. Thank you very much, Speaker. This is an important question, and I want to be very clear that the Ontario government is very much committed to helping victims of crime when they need it the most. Speaker, since 2003, our government has invested over a billion dollars on vital services to support those who have been harmed by crime. And as part of our government strategy to end human trafficking, we will invest $1.93 million over four years to expand the benefits available under the Victim Quick Response Program to better serve victims of human trafficking. Speaker, we are also investing $6.65 million over four years to enhance the Victim Crisis Assistance Ontario Program so that our community-based service delivery partners can provide better support and case coordination for victims of human trafficking. Speaker, further, as part of government sexual violence and harassment plan, in 2015 we increased funding to service all centres by $1.75 million per year. Speaker, there is definitely more to do, and I remain very much committed to supporting victim services across the province. Thank you. Supplementary? Well, I'm glad to hear that the minister is committed, but you seem happy to throw small amounts of pots of money at the problem hoping that it will go away. It just shows that you're not taking the concerns of victim services organizations seriously. What I hear is that they are exasperated. They have not heard anything from the government in response to their call for a review of the current funding formula. Several of my colleagues on this side of the House have raised these concerns over the past several months from all across our ridings, Hope 24-7 for example, but this government is not listening. There is still no action. Mr. Speaker, will this government finally commit to a review of its Victim Service funding formula in consultation with providers to ensure that it meets the needs of victims in a sustainable way? This government has done more to support victim services than any other previous government. The work this government and this premier has done in terms of putting an end to human trafficking, in terms of combating sexual violence and harassment, there is no example of any government in the history of Ontario, the amount of investments and policy work that has been done by this government. And, Speaker, I'm very proud of being part of a government that take these issues seriously because it goes to building an inclusive economy. Speaker, what worries us the most is the $12 billion cuts that they have outlined, the conservatives have outlined in their platform that is going to gut exactly these kinds of programs. It's okay for the member opposite to stand up and ask for more investment whereby her own platform is going to cut all victim services and all these important funding for her community and communities across the province. New question, the member from Essex. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Corrections and Community Safety. The Auditor General's report made it alarmingly clear that this Liberal government is not prepared to manage a major emergency in this province. The AG highlighted that emergency management plans haven't been updated since 2008 and that provincial nuclear emergency preparedness planning hasn't been updated since 2009. In communities like mine in Amesburg, who are within the fallout radius of the Fermi-2 nuclear plant in Michigan, are left vulnerable with no support for a potential disaster from this government. We're joined here today in the gallery by Fire Chief Bruce Montone and Deputy Chief Leeds home from the town of Amesburg. They're here on behalf of our community to listen to your answer to this important question. And the question is the same one that this town has been asking since 2015. When will the Liberal government provide the same level of support to the town of Amesburg as it does for other designated municipal areas that receive assistance in our area? Thank you very much for the member for his question and I want to say welcome to our Legislature to our Chief here today. You know Mr. Speaker, the Auditor General agreed that Ontario can respond and will respond to any emergency. And her findings were actually very consistent with those of our earlier independent review. Our response could be more efficient and this is exactly why we launch our new Emergency Management Action Plan and that includes the release of an updated Provincial Nuclear Emergency Response Plan in the coming weeks. We're also going to expand our emergency management capacity through agreements with our neighbouring provinces and state to share supports and resources and also supporting our municipality by making it easier to access critical supplies and resource and by improving information and resource sharing. Thank you, the supplementary. With all due respect none of that answer addresses the issue that the town of Amesburg is in. The province has been aware since November 2015 that in the event of a nuclear accident at the Fermi-2 facility the town of Amesburg does not have the equipment, the personnel, the expertise or the capacity to appropriately respond to such an event. Despite clear letters to this minister and submissions to the Provincial Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Plan highlighting the danger to our community, the minister has effectively ignored all of our concerns. Will the minister tell this house when the people in Amesburg and the entire region of Essex County can expect the same resources and assistance so they can plan to be as safe as other designated communities in Ontario? Well I'm very happy to respond again to the question. You know Mr. Speaker our nuclear power has been the backbone of Ontario's energy supply for 40 years in Ontario. Providing a clean energy that help us to get rid of dirty coal and meet our GHG reduction goals. You know when you look at what we are providing for a municipality such as Amesburg of man which is our agency will help from both our government and our partner in support with the municipality will help actually strain its nuclear emergency management program. What we do Mr. Speaker is help work together enhancing the planning, the training, public education, emergency exercise to ensure that the community that has the continued ability to respond to emergency and nuclear. We've also took note of the letter that was sent during the public consultation. Thank you. And our expert panel has. Thank you. New question to member from Davenport. Thank you Mr. Speaker. My question this morning is for the Attorney General. My constituents in Davenport are accessing more services and getting more things done on just their smartphones than ever before. They are shopping online, resolving their disputes, banking and setting up mortgages all on their tablets. They expect that level of convenience in all aspects of their life. In the ever evolving world around us, the justice system has just not kept pace. Mountains of paper, endless filing and mandatory in-person attendance for things that just do not need to be in person all make for a system that is sorely out of date. That is why I was so pleased to see the Attorney General last week announce new measures to bring the justice system into the 21st century. These new measures which the Attorney General has called putting justice within reach are incredibly important. Can the Attorney General please explain how this plan will actually put justice within reach for my constituents? Thank you Attorney General. Thank you very much. I want to thank a member from Davenport for asking a very timely question. In order to maintain access justice, Ontario's justice system must continue to adapt and evolve to continue meeting the needs of the people it serves every day. That is why the Ministry of the Attorney General is committed to making the justice system simpler, faster and more affordable for all Ontarians. We are developing and delivering user-centered consumer-focused digital services that are faster, that are easier to navigate and low or no cost to the people who use it. Speaker in the next year, new online 24-7 paperless options will be available for getting more important tasks completed more easily and conveniently. One example speaker of this plan will be that Ontarians can use new digital tools for potential jurors, for example, to complete questionnaires online and receive summons by email. Speaker by introducing modern technology and developing data systems that allow information to be shared with the click of a button. Thank you. Ontario is using ways and innovation. Thank you. Supplementary. I would like to thank the Attorney General for his response. It is very exciting that my constituents can't expect to modernize justice sector. However, Mr. Speaker, we have heard many promises to modernize our justice system before. While the news is exciting, I do point to how far behind the justice system has fallen behind in terms of modernization. And I wonder what will the Attorney General be doing this time to ensure that this actually happens this time? This is a necessary change and we have a long road ahead, but this is a step in the right direction. However, the system in place, the systems in place have been around for so long. What makes the Attorney General think that he will be able to change a system that has been operating the same way for such a long period of time? A system that is inherently known for sticking to tradition. Can the Attorney General please give clarity to this chamber on why this modernization will actually happen this time? We have to modernize our justice system and it is something that I have identified as a priority for our government or for our ministry. And, Speaker, we are taking steps that are practical and prudent in making sure that we are bringing digital options for users of our justice system across the province, whether it starts from e-filing in our small claims court or for civil matters or, Speaker, in spring very soon we will have joint divorces that could be filed online as well. These are just some practical examples of things that we are already doing. Speaker, that is why also we have outlined all our priorities in a digital justice action plan so that Ontarians have a roadmap available to them with timelines so they can keep us accountable. Speaker, what worries me is when I see the Opposition Conservatives platform, where there is no talk about how we will modernize our system, Speaker, we need to be mindful of that. Thank you. New question, the member from Dr. Callaghan. My question is to the Minister of Transportation. 12 years ago the GTA West corridor was identified in the growth plan for the greater Golden Horseshoe. Since then the Minister has consistently dragged his feet on the environmental assessment of the GTA West. Two years ago the Minister took the unprecedented move of suspending the environmental assessment. My freedom information request shows that the Ministry of Transportation has spent over $14 million studying the highway corridor with nothing to show for it. This week will mark the second anniversary since the Minister suspended the environmental assessment. Why the delay, Minister? Thank you, Minister of Transportation. Thank you very much, Speaker. I think the member from Dufferin Callaghan for her question, she may not be aware of this a number of days ago on the Ministry's website we posted that there will be an update regarding this particular project that will be taking place within 60 days of that notice going up on the website, Speaker. I'm extremely proud to be part of a government that has literally invested billions of dollars in highways in every corner of the province, Speaker, just the other day. I joined with members from the government caucus in Brampton where we announced and officially opened up lanes for the widened Highway 410 in that neighborhood, Speaker. A few days later, I was standing alongside in the brisk weather. The member from Etobicoke Center and the Minister of Housing and was the Minister responsible for poverty reduction as we opened lanes on Highway 427, Speaker, in northern Etobicoke and, Speaker, on that same day out in Durham in the Clarenton area, Speaker, standing alongside the Minister of Agriculture and the Minister, the member from Durham, we announced that starting in January, Highway 407, East Phase 2A will be open to vehicular traffic and I look forward to providing more. Thank you. Supplementary. The only thing the Minister has done on the GTA West Corridor has continued to kick the can down the road. You announced it two years ago, you announced it a year ago and now you're saying in other 60 days, what's the delay? The reality is that the land along the proposed route of the GTA West has been frozen for years. Peel in York Region and municipalities around the GTAJ have been calling for the Minister to finish the environmental assessment. Residents and municipalities have no faith that this Minister will finally make a decision on the future of the project. After all, the Minister has committed in the past to provide, quote, updates only to find another reason to delay. After $14 million spent, will the Minister commit today to restarting the environmental assessment of the GTA West Corridor? Thank you, Minister. As I mentioned a second ago, our government's record when it relates to highway construction is unprecedented. We are literally again investing in highways in the GTAJ and in every corner of the province of Ontario. Speaker, what I will not accept and what I will not contend with gracefully in this Chamber Speaker is a member of Ontario's Conservative Party. Let's not forget, this would be the party that first told and then sold Highway 407 to a Spanish Consortium Speaker. I will not take lectures from a member from Patrick Brown in the Ontario Conservatives Caucus when it comes to highways that are needed here in this province, Speaker. We know, Speaker, we know all about their people's guarantee and we know one thing, Speaker. What's guaranteed in their plan should they ever come to power, Speaker, will be less infrastructure investments, will be less public transit, will be fewer highways where they're needed, Speaker, will be less money for cycling infrastructure. I consider it a test, so I'm going to pass. The member from Bruce Gray Owensown is warned. Times up. New question, the member from Kitchener Waterloo. Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care. My office is working with Patricia and Don Dayton. Patricia and Don have been married for 64 years, but they are currently forced to live apart because they have differing health needs. Patricia is in the dementia unit at University Gates, a long-term care facility, while Don is living at the West Hill retirement home. Every morning, Don takes a cab to visit Patricia at her long-term care facility so that they can have breakfast together. It breaks his heart to leave her each day. Our seniors should not have to go to such great lengths to be together, especially at a time when they need each other the most. Currently, Don and Patricia are on a very long reunification waitlist to the Waterloo, Wellington, Lynn. Speaker, what will this government do to reunite Don and Patricia as soon as permanently possible? Thank you, Mr Speaker. I believe I understand the question correctly, that one individual is currently in a retirement home and the other is in a long-term care home. I'm not sure if the first individual has been assessed and is eligible for long-term care or not. Perhaps the member could address the question. We are in fact making important changes, quite frankly, called them dramatic changes. One of the member's colleagues I have to acknowledge, the member from Niagara, was instrumental in encouraging us and helping us look to this issue of reunification of loved ones, of couples, elderly couples, Mr Speaker. We're making changes that will and I need to be careful. I'm not sure if the regulation is proposed changes that will make it much easier for our long-term care homes and for those individuals to be reunited, but perhaps the member if she doesn't mind, could just indicate whether the individual in retirement is eligible for long-term care. Thank you. I will tell the minister that there is a letter in his office with the details but, Speaker, we need a dramatic change in long-term care almost a decade ago, otherwise we would not be in this position right now today. Retirement should not be marked by stress and uncertainty. Dawn and Patricia's story is just one of the many stories of seniors in my community who are forced to live separately. The waiting time for Dawn and Patricia to be reunited is currently estimated at more than 1,000 days. These numbers are truly heartbreaking. Couples like Dawn and Patricia who have been together for 64 years shouldn't have to wait three years to accommodate. The dating's experiences exemplify a broken and fragile long-term care system that is struggling to accommodate our aging population. Will the minister please tell Dawn and Patricia and every single family affected by the shortcomings of the long-term care system why is it acceptable that they wait years to be reunited with their loved ones? Thank you. Well, Mr. Speaker, that's exactly precisely why we're making these changes because the first individual is eligible for long-term care, because obviously if he is not, that would make it more challenging. But Mr. Speaker, we are and I'm going to say proposed, because again I'm not sure if the reg, if the reg or if it was in the legislation yesterday, but Mr. Speaker, we're actually creating a separate category specifically to enable us in our long-term care homes and our lins and families to reunite those sorts of individuals who are both eligible for long-term care homes appropriately and we should encourage this and facilitate this who want to live together and live those remaining years together as a couple. So Mr. Speaker, we're precisely addressing and again I have to give credit to my collaboration with a member from Niagara because we looked at this and how together we might actually evolve a system where improvements are required and I believe we've got a fix, we've got a solution which is asking for. Question to member from Ottawa. Thank you Mr. Speaker. My question is for the minister responsible for young children. I know firsthand how important access to day care is. I had four children that were attending day care at different parts of my life so I know that affordability and suitability to needs is very important to all inclusive families. Now in my, the writing that I have the privilege of representing Ottawa venue, there are many new families that are arriving and are very anxious to know what are the day care options that are available to them. The anxiety raised to cost and to the suitability of the options that are available to the variety of their needs. So I want to ask whether the minister can help us say what the government is doing to meet this very important need in our different communities. Minister responsible for early years and childcare. Thank you Mr. Speaker and thank you to the hardworking member from Ottawa venue for this very important question. She has been a strong advocate on this issue. Speaker we know families across this province are facing challenges when it comes to finding childcare. That's why our government is working tirelessly to help Ontario provide accessible quality childcare options. In fact this week we announced that more than 8,400 children will benefit from the opening of 493 new childcare rooms in close to 200 schools across the province. It's amazing news. Local schools are being renovated and retrofitted for these spaces. This investment is part of our five year commitment to help 100,000 more children access to the community. We have also announced that 200 million in the 2017 budget which created 24,000 spaces. 16,000 of those are subsidized. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Speaker and thank you to the members. For our commitment to this essential aspect of life for Ontario families. It is very important for the future of Ontario to have good spaces that are needed. Indeed, I think we know that there's a lot of work that needs to be done and that families want to know as well how the system will operate. There's some governance issues. People want to know where are the spaces going to be allocated. I know in my writing particularly the question is asked regularly. Where will the places be allocated throughout the province? Will the future of day care look like in Ontario? And I wish the minister to comment on how this 100,000 spaces will be allocated. Thank you. Mr. Speaker, I'm pleased to answer the members' important question and absolutely people need to know where the spaces are going. We are investing $1.6 billion in new capital funding which includes more than 1,000 new spaces in schools, public spaces and communities across the province. As I mentioned we're building over 8,400 new spaces in 188 schools in Ontario. This includes 45 projects in French language schools, 81 projects in Catholic schools, 50 childcare projects in rural and northern school boards creating 1,800 new childcare spaces in that country. We're also investing in close to 200 schools and helping us to fulfill our commitments. It's a historic investment, one that will benefit all of Ontario and you will hear more about where these spaces are going in the coming weeks. We're helping families with access to quality childcare and we're building. Mr. Speaker, when I was commending the member for Nygra Falls, he said the member from Nygra Falls should have said the member from Nygra Falls. All members have a right to correct their record and that's true, the member from Thorn Hill on a point of order. Mr. Speaker, on this Sunday the subway station is opening. My riding of Thorn Hill is where it's going to be opening. My constituents are very excited. The constituents are very excited. Mr. Speaker, it's their taxpayers' money. I've asked to be invited to the grand opening. Please don't be petty in part. Member from Trinidad Spadina on a point of order. Thank you, Speaker. I would like to welcome a very active member of the Filipino community, Ms. Melinda Malapas. She's here with us in the corner. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. During question period, I noticed that my able assistant from my Woodstock constituency is here sitting in the audience. Welcome. Pursuant to standing order 38A, the member from Bruce Gray Owen Sound is given the notice of his satisfaction with his answer given to him during question period by the committee today at 6 p.m. We have a deferred vote on the motion of third reading of bill 166 and act to have a deferred vote on the motion of third reading of bill 166 and act to amend and repeal various acts and to enact three new acts with respect to the construction of new homes and ticket sales and events. Calling the members, this will be a five minute bill. All members, please take your seats. Would you have the floor to Representatives, this will be a five minute bill. And this item will act with respect to the construction of new homes and tickets sales for bent holidays in favor, please rise by the clerk. Mr. Nack may ride passed wife is behind Mr. shutdown is after Mr. Flynn Mr. Teeble Mr. Coddard Mr. Dixie Mr. Dixie this is man gas Mr. Cry Mr. Crack Mr. Crag Miss Domino's Domino's Mr. McGarry Mr. McGarry Mr. Morro Mr. Morro Ms. Jazzy Mr. Zimmer mr. Zimmer mr. Zimmer Ms. McMan Mr. McMan Ms. Knight New Harris Mr. Miltchie Mr. Milchie Ms. Wong Mr. Frazier Mr. Frazier Mr. Anderson Mr. Anderson Mr. Baker Mr. Baker Mr. Dung Mr. Dung Ms. Hogan Ms. Hogan Ms. Kowal Ms. Kowalla Mrs. Martins Mr. Martin Mr. Pot Mr. Pot Ms. Renaldo this is all although the police rice wanted to get recognized by the park Mr. McDonnell Mr. Harnock Mr. Harnock Mr. Hardim Mr. Hardim Mr. McLeod Mr. McLeod Mr. Jones Mr. Brown Mr. Brown Mr. Clark Mr. Clark Mr. Pardelli Mr. Yacobusky Mr. Miller Perry Senator Mascoker Mr. McDonnell Mr. McDonnell Mr. McDonnell Mr. McDonnell Mr. Scott Mr. Tomson Mr. Thompson Mr. Barrett The ayes being 50, the nays being 43. I declare the motion carried. Third reading of the bill. Toisain lectured. Deproger de loi. Be it resolved that the bill you now pass and be entitled as in the motion. There are no further deferred votes. This house stands recessed until 3 p.m. this afternoon.


Now all six of these things share a common feature. They entrain circadian rhythms. Circadian means on a 24-hour cycle like the sun, the day-night cycle. And all of these things are meant to be rhythmic parts of our lives. So what happens? Our body has lots of clocks. Every cell has a circadian clock, its own internal clock. We have a trillion cells in our body. All of those trillion clocks need to be synchronized in order for us to have good health. So we have to make sure each of those cellular clocks is working. It's not like the grandfather clock that stopped ticking. And then we have to make sure they're all keeping the same time. It's like in the spy movies. All the spies have to get together, synchronize their watches. If they're going to work together successfully, if our cells are going to work together successfully, they have to synchronize all of their clocks. And if you achieve that, then you'll gain at least six years of life expectancy. So that's a really big gain. What happens if you fail to do it? Well, we have all these different ways of doing it. And it turns out just screwing up any one of them is pretty terrible. So if you look at people who get sleep loss, either because they do night shift work or they have sleep apnea, which obstructs their breathing and wakes them in the middle of the night, here's the list of diseases they get and they lose about six years off their lifespan. But a totally different way of entraining circadian rhythms is exercise. That's something we need to do in the daytime, and it establishes good circadian rhythms. And what about people who never exercise? What happens to them? Well, they lose six years off their lifespan and they get exactly the same list of diseases as the people who do night shift work or have sleep apnea. Why is that? These things are feeding into the same biological pathways. And that's where they deliver their benefits.


That's a very simplistic conclusion, possible, it is a possibility but not necessarily so. Genius means the word genius comes from the word genesis a genu means creation or creativity or the source of creation. So, a genius means somehow he touched the source of creation, annoyingly or knowingly. Either you can become consciously motorized being a genius or unconsciously a genius. When I say unconsciously becoming a genius, you can say a Beethoven is an unconscious genius. He doesn't know why he's a musician but he is deaf of hearing but still music flows because you don't become a musician because you have a great voice, because you have a great sense of hearing, that's how you become a musician. So, somebody who cannot even hear becomes a musician. This is an unconscious genius, maybe because he could not hear the normal sounds, he paid attention to something else. You have heard Yogis speaking about how if you become meditative, first you will hear a bell, then you will hear a harp, then you will hear some other music, you have heard these stories? So, because everything was, you know, he's tone deaf, he cannot hear any external sound, maybe he started listening to something else and sounds formed themselves into whatever, became a great musician. So, this is an unconscious genius, probably, we cannot make the judgment, probably. But you never know, maybe he was conscious because he's in Europe, he could never talk those things. So, maybe he only spilled out the music and never managed to speak because it's not allowed to be spoken in a particular society. If he was in India, he could blibber whatever he wanted, you know, because of safety net. No, it's very important, if spiritual dimensions have to really evolve in a society, that freedom should be there, their crazies will come, loonies will come but sages will come too. You heard of the mathematician, Pramanujan? On his deathbed, he wrote a theorem. There are many others before that, but on his deathbed he wrote a theorem. After hundred years, only in 2010, I think, they figured it out that this theorem describes the black holes in the universe. One hundred years ago, even the concept of black hole did not exist in the scientific community, but he made a mathematical calculation for the black hole describing black hole through mathematics because unless any theory that you make, unless you have a mathematical backbone, that theory is discarded. But now he did not have a theory, he just made a mathematical backbone and he said, I don't know what this is, my Devi gave it to me. Like in Yoga Center, we have a Linga Bhairavi, like this sun deity consecrated window into the creation. So all these deities are actually doorways into the limitless possibility. If you know how to open the doorway, this becomes a limitless possibility. For him, it all became mathematics. For somebody, it might have become music. For somebody else, it becomes something else. Or if you are consciously approaching it, you can make it what you wish. Whatever you wish, you can make out of it. And consciously, if you get there, it may become one dimension of the universe. So mathematics did not get invented in your classroom, do not curse your math teacher. It is the nature of the universe. This is the only way the nature of the universe can be translated into human experience and one of the reasonably efficient ways to do this is mathematics. Words would be total waste. The only efficient way to do it is to imbib the universe as a part of yourself. That's what yoga means. Yoga means it's become one, everything is in union. That's the only way you can truly know it. Mathematics is a reasonably good way to interpret it. So a genius might have happened due to many reasons, but it is not necessarily that in his previous life, Ramanujam was a mathematician, Abhitovan was a musician, not necessary. There might have been something else. Definitely there was something of some consequence, okay? Definitely there was of some evolution of state within themselves. That might have manifested as music or math or something else in this life, but it is not necessary that they must have been musicians or mathematicians. It is just that somehow they opened a window or a door. Because of that, one dimension of life became simply apparent for them.