All right boys back to the bracket. Here it is. Game number three. We beat Shotcray. We beat PogueVision 17 seed. Now we're gonna face Chaz. Knocked off Hammerpants with knocked off 48 seed. Knocked off 81 seed. So 200 dogs went at it. Hammerpants have played a million times on Xbox. Definitely been playing for a long time. So Chaz has won these games. So he's definitely hot right now. Let's see what he got boys. All right boys. Game number three. We're hot. Finally the round of 62. This is starting to get down to nitty gritty. It started with 250 people. We're down to 64 people on Xbox. Gotta play my best man. If you like these videos you guys have been showing mad love. Like, comment. If you haven't subscribed, hit that subscribe button. Let's get into this game play. We gotta play better. Every game I play you gotta keep playing better because your competition's gonna get better. It's gonna get tougher. It's gonna be, you know, tougher to play. So gotta cut out those mistakes. Gotta continue to grind and I continue to keep playing well man. Stay focused and one game at a time. Let's get into it boys. You guys have been showing love on his format. How I do these sweatier games. So let's do it. You know, I get the ball first. That's always, or he gets the ball first. That's always a dub. I've honestly been getting the ball or kicking off. Here's why I check his abilities. What does he have? Short route knockout, medium knockout, medium. So pretty much it's standard things that you guys see nowadays. So for me, little inside shade action. Pretty much what we all have. He's got an inside stuff and he's got a nasty streak. So I don't know what he's gonna do with that. He might be getting nasty. Who knows, I'm a little afraid of that. We see trips. Now normally trips the tight, the running backs on the other side. This is actually Kansas City trips. Now it's kind of tough really because you have those four wide receiver or four options, four receivers on the left. You can't run match against that. So it's definitely a formation I haven't seen a lot. I want to see an inside zone here. Picks up a couple yards.  And normally I would flat the running back on the trips side. We have a lot of experience playing against trips tight end but this trips tight end with the running back one on the, the trips side a little bit tougher as he gets another run here. He's going to no huddle right to the line. You see he's got Moss, Andre Reed, Justin Jefferson. So definitely got every player acquired here. Holland, I'm manned up on the running back. We got a fourth in inches here early. Now I'm not a big gambler early in the game, especially on fourth and short. Never going to like run commit or never going to like sell out right here because even if he gets his first down he's not in scoring position or anything like that. So hopefully if he runs we're going to get a shed somewhere and see where I put Ronnie. I moved Ronnie a lot. You see right there I moved Ronnie a lot down. So he's more in the box. So now we have what seven people right here in the box. And you see it almost worked. Like it almost Ronnie lot almost. He's right where they're with me. I take the A gap and if he would have took the B gap, I guess, you know, he just kind of ran right where I ran, you know, and then he was able to get on. But he probably got that first anyway. Gets the first down. So three, two runs have passed the run back. Right here, he audibles to a bunch strong. I'm going to, I'm going to, once again, you're going to see me probably third to outside for a corner route. Yes, exactly. Same thing. I got any cross or coming across. And you see the corner route is absolutely bagged. He's going to take off with her to throw the ball away. That's what, that's how I stop corner routes. They're in my subtips. If you guys are subbed on the Twitch, they're in my discord, everything like that. So that's definitely how I do it right here. We have great covers where I'm going underneath. He's going to go up top and moss me and parm is going to take it to the crib. Oh my God, I got it. The thing with these passes is you kind of got to be ready to click on like, I'm, and, and you know, when you're in the final 32 of a big tournament, man, you're not really expecting a dude to just fade. Like this not even open. He's just face throwing, but that's what kind of mutt is now, you know, and moss just wasn't tall enough and then didn't make the tackle. That's the worst part. You give up a 30 yard game, but then don't make the tackle. That's kind of like insult the injury for the most part. So we're down seven, but I don't feel, I gave up a cheap touchdown. I didn't get dotted. I didn't feel overwhelmed. I just gave up a cheap touchdown. So we definitely got a, you know, I don't know. I don't really know what else you could do to parm. I like moss. That's why I have moss in that spot to guard the tight ends and trips tight end because he's six foot. He can go get the ball if it's thrown up. So I like that matchup if he keeps trying me. Here he's in 335, but he's baseline. Not a lot of people baseline. We'll see what he goes through. I would, I would assume it's zone and it is it's a little cover four right here and we're able to get this corner out because we ran a streak to run off all the deep blue zones. That's what you got to do. If you're struggling against cover two and cover three or cover four, take B Jefferson on a streak. He's going to run all four, all two of those cover four zones deep down the field. Our moss might have been in like a 30 yard purple or something, but you want to run a streak then the corner out of your struggling against zone. Here I do a similar thing, motion out. We were actually looking for the post over the middle of what we got shetted here.  So we had to step up and the contain got me, but I saw I had Devante, so I liked that a lot. So he's got a different look. It's definitely the 335 loop, but he's baseline. He's looping off the left here. Probably could have had parm there, but I didn't like it and throw the ball away. It just surprises me that someone would play tight man coverage and baseline. So what that means is that all his corners on the outside are actually manned up on Adams and Jefferson. So they're in terrible position to like make plays, you know? So for me, as I take off at Rogers or I slide, this is a tough decision. It is. And how I had, I got dominated in the first half or the first quarter, the first drive, I might have went for this, but I'm going to kick because I trust my defense. I don't think this guy, if you ran inside zone or something like that, it's nothing I haven't seen. So I feel like I can hold them. Just get some points on the board, keep fighting, extend the game. Big tackle by Ronnie lot there. So like I said, I feel good about against this set. Just got to stop the run really. That's what's been popping me. And here he's going to get the ball off again, canceler, a little bit too slow right there.  His first big gain run inside my territory past the 50. And here he's going to run an option. And now I did not see that coming at all. I can't lie, picks up 25 more yards. That got me. So inside zone around the edge and an option. And he's in field ball range. So that's tough, definitely tough. But you know, now I saw you as an option. So I will change my option. Now if you guys ever run into this trips with the running back on the trip side, make sure you put your option on conservative. That way you still use, I do that because now I treat every run the same. I go get the running back. I don't have to wait if it's inside zone or wait if it's option. I'm going to get the running back. So I put my option on conservative. So my computer gets the quarterback. That's pretty much my goal really. I don't want to have to chase the quarterback. Let the computer do that. And I'll go get the running back in every single situation. Here we're going to go man covers, little hook curl, little thirds just to guard the any corner routes. And Moss is getting, Moss is getting whooped. Man coverage, I expect Moss to cover. The running back was really OP last year in routes, out routes, everything. This year, not so much. They kind of get covered up in man coverage pretty well. So we got to hold right here. We do a great job. We're going to click off our user, get a sack. We got hold of three here, man. We got a free touchdown with Parham on the first drive. Couple runs got him in the scoring position this drive but we cannot let him touch the paint, man. We're definitely backs against the wall a little bit right here. He's having a great first half. Another run here. Warren Sapp is doing nothing at what it makes the tackle though. So we got third and goal from the 11. This is where you see I'm setting zone drops right now. Probably going 10 and 10 and just go ahead and run cover four and say, check down and kick your field goal. Cause you know, I don't think this guy is going to make that gutsy call to go for it. So right here, it's just, I am completely going to allow him to check down or run the ball here. As long as I hold him to three and I get the ball we'll be feeling pretty good here. And I said, and he just steps up and it was covered in the middle. Get a sack again. He's going to kick another three. So I'm down by three, I'm down by seven. So now I'm like, I still don't realize that he's going to mix in a little man coverage with this look. I am going to a man beating play here, looking for the post for Jefferson. We're going to go double slants as well. So we'll see, oh, we'll do a comeback route if it's covered three, it is man coverage. Step up here, we get sacks as the pocket collapses. Now, one thing if you watch this, the outside leverage on the outside corner on the right is covering Jefferson. Now this post is probably my best man beating route that I have. And I put the streak to run off any deep blue so I can probably get a touchdown. But this outside leverage from the corner on the right, he low key like doesn't really get beat that bad on this route from the baseline. Like he's kind of beat, but not, not if he was right on top of the receiver. So that's tough. Let me go to the corner route here. And you start realizing that, you know it's just man coverage. He just wants to run baseline man. One, not only, it makes it tougher to hit the sideline cause all the corners are over there. So maybe we got to start hitting more drags. We got to start hitting more slants. Get the ball into Devonte hands and the Jefferson's hands and make some plays on some drags and some slants rather than just corner routes and out routes because the corners are out routes, really. Or the corners are out there. They're the outside, you see them. So let's start hitting Adams on his drag. Let's start hitting some shorter routes over the middle of the field. You start with drags here. Look at, look at Adams right here. Catch it, run sideways. So you get away from that guy, get out of balance here. Clock is, clock is stopped. We got to get touched. So that's what I want to start mixing in more because you see the guy guard Devonte Adams is 15 yards to his left. So this is just a free pitching catch right there.  A little short knockout, knocked that one out though. So, and if I, if you noticed he put his zone down on the right side here. So at some point where, once he starts putting more and more zones then we can start looking deeper down the field.  Atwooder got me. Atwooder just came out. He's a little bit faster than all the other users. But look how far, like he's, right there I can't lie. I kind of made my decision where I was going with the football. You see Devonte Adams is wide open, obviously. But, man, maybe if I let it go sooner, maybe a different free form. It's a greedy play. But, you know, sometimes you gotta tip your cap to the opponent going just far enough to get back to this pass. I don't know if you guys would have thrown this B route. Maybe I gotta let it go sooner. But honestly, you see the safety that B is right on right now. I didn't know if he was in a yellow zone, a deep blue. I didn't know what he was gonna do. So maybe I had to wait for him to clear that guy. So, ultimately it's pretty good defense, man. I was a little bit late. Maybe if I free formed it back to the right a little bit more. But I think he got exact, just went as far as he could with the new Atwater card.  And what's tough about, what's tough about the new cards is, we haven't played against Atwater. Atwater just came out this day, this morning. So, you know, I don't know how fast he is. I'm not used to him being, you know, I'm used to people having Cam, maybe Michael Parsons, maybe whoever else, maybe Eric Rowe, but that Atwater was a little bit faster and taller to go get that. So, the speed was a little bit different. Definitely forced that one. So now, dude, we're kinda looking tough right now. We had to settle for three. We threw a pick. This guy's running the ball. And as you see, that's the option again, but we played conservative. We're gonna let him go ahead and try to milk this clock out. Hopefully he just doesn't try to score here. As you see, it's under 30 seconds. That's that corner out defense. He has nowhere to go with the ball. 19 seconds. He's almost milking himself. Now, oh my goodness. And he gets out of here. Big play, but Hayes actually gets time. He calls timeout. 12 seconds left. He probably should have been a little bit more aggressive. We're gonna cover this out, Rowe here. Back to mil, we get a sack. I mean, good luck there. You know he's looking for the quick out, Rowe here to par him. You guys see, I just play straight man covers and we're gonna blitz everybody. And I guarded that Rowe and he has nowhere else really to go. So that's pretty much gonna be the end of the half. Seven seconds left. I don't think he can do anything to get out of bounds. He has one timeout left.  So we get the ball. We had two drives. We settled for three. We got lurked. So we're definitely, this is a good game. Don't get in the way. Come on, it's the tackle. And we're getting sacked again. First down, second down. There's that slant to Jefferson. You can't cover him if you're across the field. So we get a first down there. Once again, we're going for this post route. We're going for a bomb. A lot of pressure. I tried to free form that right there a little bit late. I could have hit that right over the center, missed that pass. So this is, I mean, it's a similar look to what we've all been playing, but the baseline makes it a little bit, I don't wanna say tougher, but trickier. You know, we got to kind of run different combos. And where right there we dumped the ball off would have loved a better free form, better animation right there. And that way we could have got up the field. But got a couple, third and seven. Now, this is where at the end of the day, you know, Randy Moss is still on a corner route. Randy Moss is still money on a corner route, but boom, Jefferson, big catch in traffic, slant. I don't know how this is. Jefferson is the real deal. He really is. Like if you guys don't have him and he, I would put him as your number one target on your team. He's the real deal. Right here, we're trying to motion block. Don't really get it going really. So we're going to chuck the ball away. We didn't get a good seal. I want to hit this post route. So bad for a free touchdown. I really do, but this baseline man is, it's definitely tough. It's definitely given me more looks as we come out here straight bench right here. Luckily he played cover four right there. It wasn't man and Jefferson again, just stiff arm somebody in the face, breaks more tackles inside down to the 21. So definitely got to think a little bit more, break out some new combos. And we're going to look for the corner route here. It's still just corner routes. We're going to go to par, I'm up top. Just fries, Randy Moss, that was a free touchdown. That one was free.  So your corner routes are definitely still want to eat. You got to remember that. Nothing to overthink really is nothing to overthink. Go back to what works against man. Even though it doesn't look like man pre snap, go back to what works against man. Ah, good play. Carlton, 34 we got to make a play here. This is a short pass situation.  I didn't really want to defend trips. Bunch, I don't want to say I have no problems, but a little bit more comfortable. Same thing, quarter deep blue. We're going to send this guy, hit him. Bumble, it's no way we don't pick up. Let's go man. Big play right there. It's just, I mean, just, just love that defense. Walk out of here with a dove. Love this defense. All the balls, the bunch. I'm going to deep, deep third to outside. So no corner routes can hit me. I mean, he had the wheel route, but he doesn't want to make that read, especially to the short side. At this point, he has nothing. I guard the running back, send it, there it is. So we get a turnover back on offense. Now I went back to bench and Rogers. That happens to me so much. I almost want to go back to jail and hurts because look at this space I have right here. Like, go, look at that. That's 10 yards easily with hurts. I get out of there and get caught from behind. I fumble so much. And it's a spot where you really can't slide. So that hurts me too. There it is, underneath the Jefferson, picking up a first down. The way he's playing these short in-breaking routes are going to be money. They're always going to be open. We're probably looking for Moss right here. He did a good job covering up, throw the ball away. That's what I mean, getting close rather than scramble and throw the ball away. Lived to play another down, second and 10. Tie ball game here. We're at a motion out the post here. Now maybe it'll work a little bit better. We'll have it if we got time. And, ah! Let's go, Justin! Let's go, man. Come on! Gritty! Now, if you watch his user, he got me scared a little bit. I wasn't going to throw it when he went right there, but then he cuts back down, boom, free. Touchdown. Let's go, Justin! Great play. Fry and Lester Hayes right there. So we're up seven. We're up seven. If you guys saw, he's going to pop a little run here. This is the most I've been ran on in this defense. Dude, like. I don't know what it is. I don't know if it's like the alignment, but.  See, he's got 118 yards rushing. Tough, man. And now, I'm taking the safe. I could. I did it. My linebacker's in the game. Diablo and Lawrence Taylor playing outside linebacker now.  Yeah, there's probably way better defenses.  You finally, yeah. There's probably way better defenses that stop the run. There probably are. And I know that. But I don't want to then weaken my pass defense. My pass defense is really good, as you see right there. So. It's on the trash. Just chuck, chuck, chuck, chuck, chuck. So I'd rather try to stop the run out of my good pass defense. That way, when he does have the pass, he's going to struggle, man. You don't want to make the run option and the pass easier option as we got a fourth down here. What's he going to do here? End of the third quarter. Big decision here. Fourth and seven could be the end of the game for him. And he's going to kick. He's going to kick three. Get within four. So I'm happy now. I don't want to say we struggled, but we're definitely in a good game right here. We're in a battle. So we got to go ahead and put something together. I just start this off with a run, man.  We got to mix in some runs here. Keep the clock running. And I think I'm going to do that right now. Little one-trap. You know, I play so much in them. Warren Seth just dominated it. So we get a third and five right here. We're flipped the other way here because, I don't know, I don't remember. I'm not in love with this play. Parham, nobody. Rogers. Ooh. I don't know what I was really, I think I wanted Moss on this play. I think that's really what I wanted on his out route. And you see, he was like super bad. Now I didn't look at Parham. I was looking at Moss here. Parham I probably throw this and complete it for sure. And then Devante obviously, but his users in the middle, I don't want to flirt with that with a four point lead. So Moss being in that bag, I thought I'd be able to sneak that quick out route on him, but he just, it just didn't work. So, got to go for this, man. You got a chance to win the game. Nothing overthink. Run your man-beater play, quick snap. You're going to have somebody par him. Same play I could have done in my last play. Not an overthink. Big play. Now we should run the ball two times before we even think about passing. The clock's a factor now. One first down now and this game is cooked. That's a nice, oh my goodness. They just shed, they just shed instantly, didn't they? I don't know how that wasn't a bigger run. Like, look at that dude. Doesn't that look like money? Oh my, I think I just hit the right trigger and this guy on the right just like, oh my God, like just, that's Bruce Matthews too, man. Bruce Matthews got to put him, hold him for another second, dude. And somehow that run was only one yard, but you know, that's what happens when I run the ball. But like I said, go back to the same man-beating play. The same, it's man coverage, don't overthink it. Let's see what I do here. Beautiful, moss, endofilore range, in bounds, two minute warning. Now we're going to just run the ball here. Now right here, now if I could guarantee a touchdown, I would take the touchdown, right? I would take it, but I don't know if Derek Henry's going to score right here. So my thought is, cause all this goes through my head instantly. I know there's a corner on the right side somewhere, right, off the screen. The guy on the left side of the screen, Devontae Adams is blocking. Probably will get blocked and won't be able to catch me. Micahide is five yards to my left. If he gets a clean run, he'll be able to tackle me. If he gets, I don't know. So I don't think I can score a touchdown. So instead of getting the first down, what I want is second and short. That way the clock keeps running and I have an easy down to convert another first down. So what I do is I kind of swerve here to go ahead and try to get tackled before the line but close to the line. See, right here I swerve. There's that corner on the right and Micahide would have tackled me. So I don't think I score a touchdown that play. But if I get inside the 10, I can't get another first down. So I'm gonna get tackled here to milk more clock. Perfect. And that's the second and one. So now we'll be able to milk 30 seconds off the clock right here, right? And then we'll be able to get another first down, hopefully, and that's another 30. So it's just another 30 seconds you can milk off the clock. So that was my goal right there in the middle of that play. That's all that went through my mind during that one run play. And we're gonna snap this with half a second on the clock. And we get that first down 30 seconds or a timeout. Perfect. Another run. Ideally, I probably should have ran quarterback sneak. That way I went to a third and one or a third and inches but I wanted to make sure I got a first down. I didn't wanna mess around with kicking a field ball and fourth and one or something like that. So we're just gonna run honestly, make sure he uses all his timeouts. Third and eight, truth be told, you're probably not gonna go for a touchdown here. So this is 100% a run down as well. You want to use as much clock as you can here. Oh, Henry kind of fights for me. We're down to the five. So we're gonna put the controller down here, take a delay game as at 40 seconds now. Had I quarterback sneaked and got to a 30 inches on that second and one, the game would be over if I got a first down. But I played it a little bit safe, maybe did a little bit too much. But 37 seconds, that's a great point. Normally in these situations, I wanna kick, so time is everything right now, right? Up by seven. I want you to return this kick. Because if you return this kick, it might take three seconds. It might take five seconds. It might take six seconds off the clock. But I have a theme team. So my backup safeties and linebackers are golds, right? I have Raiders theme team. So I have like more rig and, what should we call it? Just safeties that are slow, 78 speed. So you're playing with fire right now. We're trying to make him return this. But that's what I want, dude. Them four seconds matter. Every single second matters in these situations. So I wanna kind of kick it left in play, not in the end zone. If I was on offense, I would let this bounce. But he's got Randy Moss and, so it went from 37 seconds to 33 and he's still at the 25 yard line. So he literally wasted four seconds for no reason there. For the chance of returning kick. Now I say, I'll take, give me those four seconds and I'll take my chances to cover any kick. And it worked out, it worked out perfectly. So 33 seconds, he has no timeouts. A lot of times in these situations, man, I like, I changed my defense a little bit. But now I'm just gonna kind of play the same defense. Make sure I have a lot of deep blues out there because, you know, I don't want anything getting over the top of my, my face. Here he's attacked, I gotta tackle him in bounds. Perfect. 20 seconds on the clock. Yeah, that's me 20 seconds and he goes a spike. So if start, he already wasted 20 seconds to get to the 37 yard line. So between the kickoff and that plays, wasted 20 seconds, 17 seconds. I'm looking at three deep right now. I really am a bunch tight end. Like I said, just a lot of deep blues out here I'm gonna have, not really, see, there it is. And that's probably a 30 yard cloud flat for any tight end streaks or tight end slants. And just like that, he throws the deep blue. GGs, that was a tough game. And I don't know, I don't know if it was my fault it was a good game. We gotta give Chad some credit. You know, I feel like we gotta give him some credit. I mean, he played a good game. He ran the ball, he do that baseline man coverage was a little bit goofy, a little bit different. He scored some touchdowns. He got a one pass with Parham. But you know, at the end of the day we did enough to win that game. So like I said, if you guys like these videos please keep showing me love in the comments. Man, I appreciate you guys. I wanna see where we're at on the battle fight. Let's see where we're at in the tournament now as we move on to the round of 32 right now. So we beat Chaz, now we gotta play up here. Cuddle Bunny, five, three, 72 and that's civil. So I gotta play civil in the round of 32 as we get to the final 16. That's gonna be a good one boys. That's gonna be a good one. So like I said, get this one. Let's get this one to a thousand likes boys. Let's get this video to a thousand likes. Show me in the comments if you guys like this style and we're gonna get game four against civil next.


This was actually done for molecular Hartree-Fock, was actually done by Clemens-Ruthan, he is known as CCJ-Ruthan, we see the first C is Clemens, it is a very famous paper and with him there is a work also by Hall, these are all very very similar, seminal papers in the 1960 Ruthan Hall equation, which was done first for closed shell and then for open shell systems which are not closed shell where the equation F of R1 will be somewhat different and then they introduce the same basis set for molecules and that was called the Popol and by Popol and Nesbeth, they have referred to as Popol-Nesbeth equations, we will not worry about it, right now let us worry about only Ruthan Hall equations, it is very important to know the history, you know how Popol and Nesbeth came in 1960s and so let us go to Ruthan equation with that little this thing, so what Ruthan proposed is that since I cannot solve this, let me expand this phi i of R1 as a linear combination of basis, okay, so I take a basis, let us say mu C mu i and some basis function A mu, so let us call it R1, R1, you understand, so every one electron function can be expanded as a linear combination of a basis and I choose this as a basis, A mu, I am deliberately writing A mu because for molecule this can eventually be an atomic orbitals, LCAOMO, this is actually LCAOMO if this basis is atomic, but the basis can be anything, but then you know to write this, this basis must be complete, right, which is again a problem, just as I had a problem that I showed for Ci, I cannot do complete because that is infinity, so usually I am going to truncate it to some m dimensional basis, remember, so these are my m dimensional basis for space orbitals, so of course I am going to get how many spin orbitals, 2m, right, my space orbitals are capital M and I am going to get 2m and then if I want to do Ci, I will get exactly 2m Cm, that is a problem that I gave, but I had, I just cheated, my m was not space orbitals, spin orbitals, right, remember, so MCn is the right answer, but here I will get 2m Cm, determinants, if I want to write determinants after this and I am going forward after Hartree-Fock, I will have 2m spin orbitals, n electrons I will get 2m Cm, one of them is Hartree-Fock of course, right now I am trying to find this, so this is an approximation, so as I told you Hartree-Fock is an approximation, then the next approximation is a basis, I am going to come back to this later, what is the basis, how do I define the basis, but let us assume that I know a basis which is finite dimensional capital M, then what can I do, so this is what Routhan did, it is a very simple mathematics which I can complete today, so what Routhan did was to, yeah, I will finish in 10 minutes, Mu equal to 1 to M, Cmu I, Mu of R1, just see what I am doing is putting this expansion for phi I of R1, both on the left and the right hand side, okay, equal to epsilon I sum over Mu equal to 1 to M, Cmu I, is it okay, of course R1 can be R2, it can be R, does not matter, it is one electron dummy variable, this R1, so what I have done, this Cmu I's are my unknown coefficients, this is known, basis is known, so your problem of Hartree-Fock was originally to find phi I of R, now the problem of Hartree-Fock is to find this coefficients, correct, if I know the coefficients I know phi I of R, so my problem has changed, from finding a function, set of n functions, so n by 2 functions, I now have a set of numbers, how many numbers of course if I have m dimension, I can get also m functions, capital M functions, which means I will have 2 m spin orbitals and many of them will now become unoccupied orbitals, just as I explained before that I always also get more than n spin orbitals, I will get more than here, this m ideally should be much larger than capital M, as large as possible but ideally much larger than capital M, so that it is nearly complete, as complete as possible, okay, so with this I put this here, so my targets are now these coefficients, I have to find out this coefficient, so what do you do is the following, multiply this function by one member of the basis, let us say a nu star R1, okay, f of R1, a mu of R1 and then integrate over dr1 multiplied by c mu of I, sum over mu we can bring outside, this is numbers, so they can come out with integration sign, so the integration is over a nu star R1, f of R1, a mu R1, dr1 multiplied by c mu I, so for a given nu, the nu is fixed, so I am multiplying by a particular nu right now, do the same thing on the right hand side obviously, so epsilon I, sum over mu equal to 1 to M, again c mu I can come outside and then you have an integral a nu star R1, a mu R1, so that becomes my equation, right, now what Duttham and Hall proposed was that all we need to know is these numbers and these numbers, integrals, remember they are again definite integrals, so they will become numbers, this will also become a number, so let me call this number a nu star R1, f of R1, a mu R1, dr1, so let me call this matrix of capital F nu mu, note that how many numbers I will have as, so this is equation is for all nu, one at a time, so how many nu's are there, M, obviously because this mu is going from 1 to M, so this will become M square in number, which I can rearrange as a matrix, so I am calling it F nu mu matrix, this entire set of numbers, I will write it, I am just calling this matrix, defining the matrix, this is a definition, I am not writing the equation, okay, similarly let me define a nu star R1, a mu R1, dr1 as a matrix of S nu mu, S is basically overlap matrix, overlap between two basis functions, if you do this then your equation becomes sum over mu equal to 1 to M, F nu mu, right, so whole thing is now F nu mu matrix, C nu i equal to epsilon i sum over mu S, actually I should have written this also outside, because this is sum over mu, so C mu i should go outside, I mean inside this integration, okay, not outside, inside the integration, so you have S nu mu C mu i, right, so this equation is a matrix of F multiplied by, so it is F times C, you can see the matrix multiplication rules apply here, repeated multiplication, this side is bit more complicated, I will analyze it little later, but imagine if they were orthonormal basis, what would happen? This will become a delta, right, so then mu would be equal to nu, so in an orthonormal basis, so let us say S nu mu equal to delta nu mu, if this equation will then become F C equal to or F C of nu i element equal to epsilon i C nu i, right, because mu would be equal to nu, so it will become epsilon i C nu i and this is nothing but an eigenvalue equation of a matrix F, so this would then become an eigenvalue equation, if I can construct the matrix F, which is much easy to do because matrix I know how to solve eigenvalue equation, however it is not quite true, because in general these need not be orthonormal, in fact this is what Rutheran proposed that in general these basis functions need not be orthonormal for molecule, the reason is the following, I would like to take the basis function as derived from different atoms, so one let us say I have water molecule, so this is where chemistry comes, so I require oxygen basis, I require hydrogen basis, oxygen atomic orbitals, hydrogen atomic orbitals, they cannot be orthonormal, why, because oxygen atomic orbitals I always ask this question, they are eigenfunctions of oxygen Hamiltonian, hydrogen atom orbitals are hydrogen Hamiltonian, so they cannot be orthonormal to each other, eigenfunctions of the same operator orthonormal to each other, but not different operator, so to take advantage of this chemistry Rutheran deliberately said let us not make this orthonormal, because a physicist would normally say you know forget about this just make it orthonormal, then it becomes very easy to do this problem, but obviously the chemistry dictates that I need to take when I do LCAO picture, I need to take different sets of atomic orbitals from different atoms, so I must not make it orthonormal, but I am just telling provided it was orthonormal, this would become a simple eigenvalue equation, but not quite, because of the spoiler, so we will see how to handle this, eventually of course you have to solve this equation in a non orthonormal basis, this will be actual Hartree-Fock equation that is solved today in Gaussian, remember all this Gaussian and all that solve actually this in a basis, so you have the 61G blah blah blah all that will define this basis and we will come to that and after that this is the equation that is solved, so forget about everything that we did, okay, I have to also tell you how to construct this matrix elements, you already know what is F of R, I am going to do the integration and how do I, so there will be also numbers, after I do DR1 each of them will become a number, so you can yourself try to do that and they will become H, matrix element of H plus coulomb and exchange matrix elements all that will come up when I do the integration, so I will show that, so once I construct this, this has to be solved and you will very easily see that because of the fact that the F has spin orbitals or space orbitals which are again in terms of basis, this matrix will now depend on coefficients, so again the SCF problem will come back, this is not a matrix defined by itself, so this matrix is actually a function of C because of the fact that the F contains space orbitals, so I will come back to that how to do that, so the problem has not vanished but now there is a second level of problem not only it is a iterative solution, I do not know it is not an eigenvalue equation, so how do I handle it, so that is something that is very important, yes, coefficients will be derived self-consistent because they are my unknowns, now the basis is already known, but depending on different basis my results will be different, so that is why I say there is no unique Hartree form, so people say SCF dash 631g, dash 631g star star, 321g, so every time you do Hartree form or DFT, DFT is very similar to Hartree form, you later see, people ask what is the basis, so now you understand why, the Hartree form is unique but unfortunately we are not able to solve for molecules, so we are bringing in these levels of approximations, so the level of approximation that we brought in for molecule really starts from here and then we do this derivation and eventually come to this equation, two atoms, same atoms located at different coordinates, yes because the molecular with respect to origin everything is defined, so your Hamiltonian is different, there is a coordinate, so it is a good question that you ask me, but errors will be too much, people have tried numerical Hartree form of course, that is towards exact, but the error is too much from the exact for molecules, yes everything is exact with Hartree form, I am talking about Hartree form exact, I mean I wrote down somewhere Hartree form itself is not, no, no, Hartree form cannot be exact anyway, I mean if you are talking of exact wave function, I am again repeating, all that we are doing when moment is Hartree form, it is approximation, okay.


Hi, good morning and welcome to these products and focus most global markets are Edging towards all-time highs of the Nasdaq making the highest level it's done in 15 years well since since 2000 the height of the Tecbom and the US 30 just don't throw away from its all-time high, which is run about 18,000 one-on-one spot nine and Following on from yesterday's candle formation things look to be quite good This is quite a strong signal to get the top end of an uptrend. Obviously there's a sell-off and push up to the top end Ukraine ceasefire coming to force in the 15th of Feb and The fact that we do have a lot of stimulus. It might be also Over in Sweden and we do also have a potential deal from Greece as they're willing to negotiate with members of the of the debt section of the European countries and On all things you're looking a little bit more bullish this morning as most global markets are edging higher Germany 30 All-time highs US 30 if you keep in hundred also looking quite good this morning and from a technical perspective we break through 17 998 Then we should be looking good for a retest of that's this one 18 100 level now we do have some economic data due out today We've got Eurozone GDP and we also have consumer sentiment and if we fast forward on to Monday Nothing exciting on Monday. Unfortunately Tuesday brings a lot of UK data and the ZDW business support So anybody trading European Indices of the Germany 30 the UK 100 there is some stuff coming next week. You won't be aware of anyway So if we actually move on to the UK 100 there you can see we're making some decent gains this morning our all-time high is 6906.8 We might even get there today should the good good momentum hold So looking at Japan to the five yesterday. There was rumors of one of the Bank of Japan and monetary committee members talking Stimulus down that be kind of productive that caused a Quite severe about a volatility on dollar yen, which is still on the downside and the Japan to do five actually sold off quite aggressively Yesterday only to bounce back as well. So this candle formation. We've got right here Should be relatively bullish next potential resistance 18 306 Technicals are neutral and the cake and there could be further room for for for growth there So looking at that dollar yen very volatile It looks to be 118 spot 99 could be a potential support that also coincides with the 55 period SMA Which could be a springboard to again challenge 121 spot 87 depends the Bank of Japan actually confirms that stimulus is now off the table That will add to further Japanese yen strength And the US data continues to kind of be a bit weak and disappoint that there's data yesterday, I believe With the retail sales figures which came in slightly worse than expected. They were expecting minus 5% and came in minus 8 So we're not really getting a huge amount of dollar positives. I'll be at non-period last people were particularly good So moving on to Cuddle West, Texas. It's resurging again 55 close to 55 dollars neck potential resistance level Reading some interesting reports around storage facilities in Cushing, Oklahoma That there should be enough storage space for people to Kind of obviously store crude oil till around about April time. So there's record storage going on right now a lot of Financial institutions are storing oil now at the cheap price Trying to hold on to it for X a minute of time to sell it on for a profit in the future And they think that could be artificially supporting prices as people are actually buying up all the crude But as soon as That area some of the largest storage space for crude in America becomes full And so they think that might actually happen in April time Then there's gonna be a potential issue because obviously there's not going to be that That same storage capacity and there's worries then that the demand for crude might actually Kind of roll over. So we'll see what happens. Anyway, the West Texas crude is advanced and higher this morning It's had a good session yesterday and it's had a good start that they up almost 2% So moving on to gold Gold slowly moving higher These long-legged candles are not that that positive a technical signal in the short term I think the pressure still remain in gold even though the US dollar has been in the back for the last couple days 1218 is the next potential support followed by 1186 the fundamentals are not on gold's favor medium to long-term anyway So looking at your dollar We are trading above the 21 period SMA. That's a that dollar weakness creeping in obviously potential Deal with Greece helping to aid the euro longer-term potential resistance once bought 1642 other technicals are neutral if US continues to disappoint and The eurozone continues to move in the right direction You could probably be looking at small gains on your dollar in this couple of sessions Finishing up with GBP USD. Obviously sterling have a fantastic day yesterday from Kearney. We've been talking up the sterling Talked a little bit about interest rates. The Fed interest rates will not rise before the start of 2016 But that deflation or inflation and deflation was going to be a major issue that Bank of England is going to have to go ahead and look at a lot of traders taking cues as to the sterling should actually be increasing in value and We are now looking at one spot 54 24 as potential resistance, which also coincides with the 55 period SMA We break above that and then we could look target one spot 55 99 well one spot 56 Technicals are not yet overbought the Mac these is the better across the zero line So that would be a bullish technical signal We've kind of broken out of multiple trend lines here But we've not yet done one spot 54 24 if we do that then I think sterling might have turned a little bit of a corner But then there's big questions about the US dollar medium term as well as a little bit on the ropes right now But should that continue to improve? I guess it depends if Traders really believe that the US dollar that they US are going to raise interest rates In the summer or not and there's a lot of people casting doubt over that just now Especially where most other countries are massively talking down their currencies and the dollar is already strengthening quite significantly Against those currencies. So in case of what does America really have to gain by raising their rates? So Perhaps it might not come as soon as what some people might might expect certainly the macaday is not supporting an incredibly healthy US economy I'll be as I perform in the other ones. It's where the US wants to position itself versus its major competitors So obviously we talked about the market economic calendar For today and early next week keep your eye on the chart form as ever make insights probably lay it going forward and Join me again on Monday to find out what happened next


Okay, so web 3.js, which is like a very core important part of the whole ecosystem a lot of people use it Shortly about me. I build a condimentary system open-source libraries worked as a web designer for like 15 years or so wrote a book about meteor and build the miss Browser and the theorem wallet how it is today now our team is a big bigger than Then just me and Alex we also have Ram, Everton and Luca as part of the team if you're somewhere here, maybe you want to stand up or you're probably standing already on the side There he is. That's Everton So and if the JavaScript API or web 3.js how it's called So I contributed to this as you can see here. This is kind of like the graph of Github contributions, I'm there in the middle this green figure But it was originally started by Jeffrey who wanted to have a simple way to Access or like deal with the node and JavaScript Writing simple scripts to interact with the node building little dabs later than joined Marek He took over the project and basically Build most part of it what is currently the web 3.js. I joined like almost two years ago and Helped refactoring a lot of this under the hood code improving the API and adding additions. I Rewrote or restructured the RPC endpoints to make them more readable more understandable and Basically because Maric is now part of ETH core and working on parity. I'm maintaining web 3.js We've also other contributors Alex there, too And a lot of others actually who also helped out So the main reason of web 3.js is because The node only understand understands JSON RPC So basically what JavaScript or what we're 3.js does is it translates this JSON RPC code Calls where you send a JSON object into something you can actually easily use in JavaScript and it looks like Calling simple JavaScript objects the EVM itself only understand spite code and That's not easy for JavaScript developer and that's probably not easy for most people and it's not really human readable So basically what web 3.js helps is translating These function names through what we call the ABI the application binary interface To something which the EVM understands and to do that you basically take the You take the function the transfer including its parameters You shall three that and you take the first four bytes and this is becomes the function name And then you add the first parameter and you add the second parameter And this you send over JSON RPC to the to the node and this way the node understands what to do in the smart contract And basically web 3.js in the contract object does all of this for you So you only have to deal with JavaScript object. They look like normal standard functions But under the hood it translated to this ABI in web 3.js.  It's quite messy right now It's it's it grows it grew just over time with a lot of people influencing the decisions And that's why there's time for new web 3.js So the whole idea is that it's Like the way it grew it became to a point where it's it's influenced by so many sites that it's not really easy to use for JavaScript developers and There are certain parts which actually doesn't don't make sense as a as a JavaScript library and It became clear to me that this needs to have a refactor at some point and the community also asked for a lot of features And things and want to have things changed and that's basically what I'm right now working on is like making the new web Web 3.js, so it will be a refactor. It's not built from scratch And it will not completely change, but it will have core pieces changed and Probably one of the main one is that the communication will be socket-based So currently everything is done in HTTP request and this will still work, but it will not work for everything because of the nature of What we do with I will show later that we have subscriptions and subscriptions need sockets So you can either use the IPC socket, which is like your local socket You you use to talk to your note on your computer or you can use web sockets So before we had this concept of the filter and this concept was rather confusing for many people So basically what you would have created a filter Watching for log events and then you watch it and then you get result or the lock at some point but this whole like it's not very descriptive and it's also in the JavaScript world not common to do it this way and It confused people because I thought a I can filter for a transaction For an address and I get all the transactions of this address that was also my first understanding of that function But that's kind of like wrong right it's it's not clear and makes no sense like this So the real way of doing this actually is subscribing to something and with the new logs It's actually even technically working as a subscription So you basically just subscribe to logs to pass in another options object Which can be the topics in this case and then you just wait for the data changes to arrive Web 3.js right now is like a big bulky Library you have to use if you want to use web 3.js in the future. This will be more Split in separate packages where you also can require the large package web 3 Which we have which will have everything you need for your DAB or you only need the utility functions or you only need the ether functions or only this one functions and one big part of the refactor is the Way how we call functions. So we currently had this way of calling function synchronous Which is a terrible idea because in JavaScript when you have synchronous functions Your interface freezes the assumption was that the responses from the node will be so so small that you never have a problem with that But reality teach us that that is actually a problem and it's also not the way you can do that in JavaScript. So From the future on everything will be based on promises but There's this special case in Ethereum that one action can have multiple end results. I Combined that with events and you basically get an promised event back So you can chain it and then will be called once the transactions mind, but you can also Listen for specific events. For example, when do you want to get the transaction hash or like the mind event and in the future? We could add more events. We could add for example a confirmation event or an event for each single confirmation up to 12 confirmations and we can think of way more things we can actually look for What happens on the theorem network with your action you did? The same goes then for other functions the question here is do we need like the events here, too? That's to be seen, but it at least keeps consistency Deploying contracts and the main change is that actually you now instantiate the new contract object using the new keyword You then have a deploy function and this will be the same as the transaction. You basically just get the The promise we solve once the transaction is mined and you actually have the contract address object But it can't the contract address and the contract object attached with the address and yours also have this event So basically you have two ways of doing it and there's also a debate going on should we add still callbacks or not? When you calling methods?  We had the problem that you could never pass is trucked in As a parameter object because web 3js would have detected this as being the options object for your center action So doing it this way it allows us to basically pass any kind of parameter And it would be clearly only a parameter and then you get an object back Which has different functions like estimate gas which gives you the gas estimation for that kind of call encode which encodes you the The ABI for that kind of call which you could then use and pass it into in the contract for example, if you have a proxy contract or Calling the function or sending the transaction for the function and this again will return a promise or an Events You also will have other utility function, which you right now don't expose But there is very necessary if you want to build more complex application and you want to do things yourself Means you can encode like you get this chasing the face just of a method and you can code the whole Thing if you want to do this in the contract object you already have to encode functions Function you will also have a constructor function, which you cannot call or send transactions to but which you can also encode There's more to come for example like passing instructs return instructs from smart contracts and I would like to get feedback and ideas so my main idea is doing everything which is currently in the 1.0 milestone and Working through it and doing it this way and then releasing an alpha getting feedback from the community and Then we can go on and release at some point a web 3.js 1.0 which Everybody's happy with and which will be hopefully the only breaking changes for the next few years But it will be a few breaking changes, but necessary ones. So your feedback is welcome to get a channel and the issue is ideally and Let's talk about what's what could be next. Thanks Thank you for the end Did you want to take a question? I Can take a questions. Yeah, if I have time any questions for Fabian any questions come on Yeah perfect microphone with the next rewrite you plan on utilizing TypeScript to help Make it cleaner and help to check for standard bugs and things like that. Yeah, it would make sense, right? I want to keep it as minimal as possible if other people want to build on top like something like a TypeScript compiling Version. Yeah, that that makes sense, but I want to keep it as like a bare minimum library Otherwise, it's getting a point opinionated again And then there's a bunch of discussions discussions and other people would then use coffee script and Everybody wants to do use something else. So I stick with the pure JavaScript Anyone else? Okay. Well, thank you very much Fabian