Sanjay Murt, Mechanical Engineering Department of Walsh and Institute of Technology at Sulapur. Today I am explaining regarding the thermodynamics video number four. The learning outcome of this video is student will able to discuss the path function and point function and the different parts of the work. So, what is the path function, what is the point function? In the previous lecture that video number three I am explaining regarding the thermodynamics process and cycle. Here it is one cycle, it is one loop and one more the graph I am showing one of the process that is here. The suppose the initial point here is the one process is to be there 1 a 2 and 2 b 1. So, 1 a 2 b 1 it is one loop that is called as a cycle. So, it is called as a one process one cycle. So, which path it will be followed that is very important when it moves from initial the arrow I am showing here. Suppose the initial point is to be there and it is a half part that is a one cycle that is a one a 2 and another half part is 2 b 1 means it moves from one complete cycle a b which path it will be followed half part is path followed by a and half part is path followed by b which path it will be followed that is very important because some what you call functions there depends on which path it will be followed. Suppose the simple example is to be there suppose you are moving from one destination to another destination through one path whatever the time required moving from one destination to the second destination that the two destination fix you are moving from your house to the school one and regular one path you can used it that path having term calculation is some 20 minutes to be there. But sometimes you can followed by different path it moves from you move from your house to the school by different path and the time calculation is different one. So, some are related to the path function and some are related to the point functions are there path functions are pressure volume temperature they are path function systems are to be there heat and work they are point functions are to be sorry they are heat and work they are to be point functions are to be there and which path it will be followed that will be very important one because when you have to calculate go for a heat and work the area under this curve we can define. Suppose heat you can calculate for this process the area under this curve you can calculate it. So, some characteristics are to be there that is heat and work they are related to the path functions are to be there and which are the point functions they are related to which path will be followed path a or path b or path c they are not related to which path it will be followed means initial condition the pressure p 1 volume v 1 temperature t 1 and here the second middle condition is the path p 2 path a is followed, but the values have to be changed p 2 v 2 t 2. So, p 1 to the p 2 they are not related which path will be followed they are to be end result they are related to the which are the state is there which is the equilibrium conditions are to be there. So, that is related to the point functions they are depends on the state only not how system it reaches that state in which that is a state a which path a is there path b is there path c is to be there path d is to be there from initial condition path e is to be there they are not related which path it will be followed these are called as a point functions are there which are a point functions pressure is there volume is there temperature is there it is to be there. So, these are to be related to the point functions are to be there another types another parameters they are related to the which path it will be followed means suppose it moves from 1 a 2 that is a work how to calculate the work that is a graph under this curve that is to be calculated here area under this graph that is to be important one means which path it will be followed that is to be very important that is are called as a point path functions are to be there. So, simple examples pressure volume temperature they are a point function they are related to the state related which where is a state where state functioning is to be there they are not related which path will be followed on the other end some characteristics of parameters are there that is a heat and work which are regularly used they are related to the path functions are to be there. Now, you go for a definitions of the what do you call work and heat work and heat is to be there. So, here I am showing work heat is a form of energy and work is amount of energy transfer is to be there heat and work also transformation of forms of energy from system to the surrounding and surrounding to the system one when heat is added to that system it is a positive one sorry heat is rejected from that system it is a positive one when heat is added that is a negative one you get the work from that system that is a positive one you have to supply the work that is a negative one some simple example is to be there suppose even your bike where petrol or diesel or fuel you get burned you get the what you call mechanical work from that system that is a positive on the other end when you have to go for a compressor is to be there to run that compressor you get the pressurized air you have to supply the work from that system. So, here work is a negative on the other end IC engineers the work is a positive one when you to go for a heat engine and heat pump heat engine you have to heat is rejected from lower side to the higher side and heat pump pumping action is to be going on. So, when you to go for heat you have to supplied for that system that is a negative you get the heat from that system that is a positive one. Now, what are the different types of works are to be there the first is the shaft work a paddle work is to be there means suppose what you call in your bicycle the motion is to be transmitted from this pocket and chain arrangement should be there. So, here work here to supplied for that by your foot arrangement you can transmit a work for that system and the bike or bicycle get starts running that is one type of work is to be there. Then PD work a piston cylinder arrangements should be there in that piston cylinder gas is there air is there some working substance is to be there when you have to add the heat for that expansion of the gas is going on. So, piston is going from level 1 to the level 2. So, whatever quantity of heat is to be added that is stored by its own energy internet but work is done how the work is done it moves from level 1 to the level 2 and that is to be stored that is a one type of the work is to be there. Electrical work is to be there suppose on closed chamber is to be there in that closed chamber the electric cable is to be transmitted and you have to supply the energy. So, the initially before supplying the energy electrical energy the temperature is T 1 we need to start the energy is the electrical is starting through that cable at wire the temperature of that room temperature of that gas is to be increased that is one type of work is to be there. So, magnetic work is to be there due to that magnetic rotations are to be going on some pendulums will be going from one end to the other end. So, due to the positive or negative due to the north pole and south poles are due to n and p poles are to you. So, working is to be going on that is a one type of work is to be there elongation work is to be there. Suppose, one cable is to be there you have to elongate that from another end one end to the other end that length is to be increases. So, this is a different type of the works are to be there. So, these are the different simple examples of the works are to be there. So, when you know the different type of the work when you know the definition of heat and work when you know the point function and a path functions when you know the definition of work and heat can you give some example of work is a positive or work is a negative heat is a positive or heat is a negative these examples you can regularly you can use it in the winter season in your house you can use the heater.  So, here so, these are the examples of the heat added or heat rejected work is added or work is rejected in the what you call winter season heater is to be there in the heater you have to that you have to supply the electric energy and due to that electric energy the temperature of the room is to be increases through that cable through the wire through that coils.  So, liquid to the gases form gases to the liquid form it is an a chilled effect and the what you call heated water is to be heated air is to be passed on that liquid it absorbs the heat and the temperature can absorb then whatever the comfortable low temperature again get circulated. So, these are the different type of works you can get. So, for this video I am taking a reference for a basic mechanical engineering book by R S Kurmi. Thank you.


I habitually receive the following query. How do I get my narcissist to go to therapy? First of all, I love the possessive. My narcissist. Like my dog, or my cat, or my goldfish. How do I get my narcissist, my pet, to go to therapy? And today I'm going to teach you how. I have no idea why you would like to get your narcissist to therapy rather than, for example, going no contact. But you know, to each his own and there's no accounting for taste. So those of you who are masochistic and enjoy being abused and tortured by a narcissist, I'm going to teach you today how to get him to therapy. And to do so, I consulted the second leading expert on narcissism globally. Her name is Franny Kriss. Yes, it's a mnemonic. Granny, grandiosity. Fanny, fantasy. Kriss, crisis. These are the three reasons that narcissists attend therapy. Grandiosity, granny. Fantasy, fanny, crisis, Chris. So stay tuned and listen to what granny, fanny, Chris has to teach you about narcissists. Because if there's anything, I mean, if she forgot it, you still have to learn it. There's nothing she doesn't know about narcissists. And so I learned a lot from her over the years and I intend to impart this knowledge being the altruist and charitable and nice person that I am. I'm also Sam Vaknin, the author of Malignant Self-Love and Narcissism Revisited and a former visiting professor of psychology. Let's delve right in. How do you get this stubborn mule into therapy? How do you convince him that something is wrong with him, that he needs fixing and healing? Well, here's the first hint. Don't ever imply that something is wrong with your narcissists. Because he's perfect. Nothing is ever wrong with him. Everything is wrong with you. This is called alloplastic defense. You are the one to blame. If things have gone awry in the relationship, it's because you are imperfect in some way.  Maybe you are too aggressive. Maybe you're too quiet and shy. Maybe you don't know how to manage him like his ex. Maybe and maybe and maybe. It's always you. The blame, the guilt, the shame, the responsibility belong 100% to you. He is perfection reified. He is godlike. Therefore, not amenable to criticism, not open to disagreement and should never be subjected to scrutiny. So, it's a very bad gambit, a proposed chess. It's a very bad gambit to come to the narcissist and say, listen, my narcissist, something is wrong with you. We need to get you some help. These narcissists don't need help. They don't need advice. They don't need anything. And anyone, because as the song says, we are the world. They are the world. They're not, they're never helpless. They're never hopeless. They're never clueless. They know everything. If they don't know exactly like chat GPT, they confabulate. They invent. So that's going this way of trying to mirror the narcissist, trying to convince him rationally, reasonably, that something may be wrong with him would lead you nowhere, except to conflict and disagreements and arguments. And if the narcissist is violent and aggressive, even worse, don't go there. I'll teach you three alternative ways, which are far, far more efficient in obtaining this goal. Let's start with the first one. You remember, granny, fanny, Chris? Granny, grandiosity. Co-opt the narcissist grandiosity. Enhance it. Amplify it. Amplify it. Support his self-inflated, imputed self-image. Make him believe that you believe what he believes about himself. And then use it against him. Leverage it to motivate him to go to therapy. It's like in martial arts, use the opponent's momentum against him. So, challenge the narcissist somehow. Tell him, I'm sure you can do this. I mean, surely you can do this. Surely you can attend therapy. Surely you are much more clever, much more well-informed, much smarter, much more erudite and much more perspicacious than any therapist alive and any therapist dead, for that matter. So challenge him, render the therapy a sort of challenge as if you are 99% of the narcissist's capacities, but you need this extra 1% bit and he can provide it by putting himself to the test, because narcissists are grandiose and at least overt narcissists are convinced of their invincibility, of their perfection, of their brilliance, etc. Few narcissists would turn down such a challenge. They would venture forth to prove to you how all-encompassing they are, how insightful and how amazingly, amazingly IQ endowed. I haven't met a narcissist who has less than 190 IQ. Okay, so co-opt his grandiosity. Just use his grandiosity in ways which would convince him to regard therapy as proof of his divine status. Let him view therapy as a way to convince you and everyone around you that, for example, he is open to new experiences. He is a rational person. He is a reasonable human being, etc., etc. Challenge him to show himself in a good light as a pro-social, communal, helpful person, caring, loving and compassionate. For example, tell him, nothing is wrong with you. I am the one who needs help. Please help me by attending therapy with me. I know that I'm to blame and I'm responsible for everything that's gone bad in our relationship. I know that something's wrong with me, but I can't help myself. Only you can help me. Please, will you be my companion in therapy? Will you attend therapy with me? I am sure that your involvement in the therapy would render it so much more relevant, so much more insightful, so amazingly transformative. So please do it for me.  He doesn't need therapy, of course, but you do. And because he loves you, he cares about you, and because he's a good person, yes, there are Nazis who believe themselves to be good people, believe it or not. The powers of self-deception and self-delusion in narcissism are enormous, and majority of narcissists would actually tell you that they're very nice people. They may abuse from time to time, they may be abrasive, but this is only tough love. They mean well, they are charitable, they're altruistic. Narcissists compensate for the internal bed-object by creating an external good-object. So they are perfectly good people. A narcissist believes himself to be a good person. Appeal to this ostensible, fictitious strand of compassion and empathy in the narcissist.  Take this extra step for me. Make it happen. Come with me to therapy, and they will. Try it at home and let me know. This is Granny. Her name is Fanny, the fantasy.  Shared fantasy is the exclusive interface between the narcissist and other human beings. If you move, if you talk, if you walk, the narcissist will create a shared fantasy with you or will have nothing to do with you. Narcissists experience is mediated via the shared fantasy. Shared fantasy could be a very helpful instrument.  So this kind of narcissist would attend therapy just in order to buttress the shared fantasy. Attending therapy would actually become a figment of the fantasy, something you both do within the fantastic space and his fantastic dimensions. The narcissist would render the therapeutic experience therapy sessions, would render them fantastic as if this were some kind of movie. And his involvement in the therapy would deepen the more it gets integrated into the fantasy, the more it upholds the fantasy, the less it challenges the fantasy. So collaborate with the narcissist, collude in his fantasy, make him believe that therapy would make the fantasy even more fantastic, would make the fantasy stable and safe and irreversible and irrevocable and would keep you in the fantasy. Let him believe that by attending therapy he could reduce his own separation in security, abandonment anxiety. In short, inform him that if he were to attend therapy you would consider this as a form of investment or commitment in your relationship, also known as shared fantasy and therefore you're much likelier to stay, not to stray, not to cheat on him, not to betray him, not to abandon him. Narcissus is a very goal oriented when it comes to narcissistic supply and the shared fantasy. In this sense they're a bit psychopathic. So if what it takes is to attend therapy the narcissist will just have to get him through the door The therapist similarly has to collude to some extent in the shared fantasy. Ahead on attack on the narcissist's grandiosity or the narcissist's shared fantasy is a seriously bad idea and the advice afforded by experts such as Elsa Ronningstam, Ronningstam, Igor Weinberg and many others, the advice regarding narcissists in therapy is indeed to not confront them, to not try to introduce reality testing confrontationally in your face. I'm going to quote from an article written by Ronningstam and Weinberg. There are a number of common mistakes they say in treatment of NPD patients. Number one, directly confronting or criticizing their grandiosity. Number two, over attending to the patient's grandiosity by ignoring insecurity, vulnerability and failures as well as real personal capabilities and assets. Number three, engaging in competitive controlling relationship with a patient. Number four, taking a passive approach expecting the patient will generate necessary solutions and progress without external help. These are the pitfalls in the therapy itself but these are also the pitfalls in convincing the narcissist to attend therapy. If you confront and criticize his grandiosity head on, forget about it. If you over attend to his grandiosity and pretend that he's never vulnerable, he never fails, he's never insecure, also it would be difficult to bring him to therapy. Now of course you should not verbalize this. You should not come to the therapist and say you're vulnerable, you're a failure, you have problems, you need help, you should never do this as I said at the beginning but you should realize it, you should accept it because within the shared fantasy it's very easy to buy into the narcissist's stories and grandiosity. Narcissists are very convincing, very charming, great confabulators and so very often their intimate partners, their business partners fall for their stories, believe in them, support their grandiosity because they believe the grandiosity to reflect reality. They think it's not grandiosity, it's reality in some way. You need to stay cool-headed. Narcissists like everyone else have strong points, assets, capabilities, skills, you need to be aware of these of course. Narcissists can stand out intellectually, athletically and otherwise but on the other hand you need to realize that narcissism is a severe pathology which renders the narcissists susceptible, gullible, vulnerable, impressionable, naive, a failure and so on and so forth. You need to maintain a balanced view of your narcissist. If you try to engage in competition, try to compete with him, if you try to control him, it's not going to work. If you try to take a passive approach or for the best, pray at night and in the morning nothing's going to happen. You need to be proactive but you need to know how to do this. Co-opt his grandiosity, ask him for help, tell him that you need the therapy and then use the shared fantasy, introduce the therapy as an element of the fantasy which is required to keep the fantasy going and together, the glue that holds the fantasy together. Narcissists are amenable to all these strategies as you're going to discover to your surprise. Okay, this was Granny. Her name was Fanny, grandiosity and fantasy. Now we come to Chris. Chris is short for crisis. It's a term of endearment. There are five types of crisis that drive the narcissists to therapy. You should not pray for crisis because narcissists can decompensate. They can act out.  They can destroy their lives and yours in the process. So crisis is the last resort. Narcissists have poor, maintain poor reality testing. They don't know what they're doing. They crazy make and they're very dangerous to themselves and to others. They're like two years old, essentially. Anything from temper tantrums to seriously bad decisions with seriously bad people.  You don't want this to happen, but if it does happen, and the narcissist is in crisis, that's a golden opportunity to drag him to therapy or to motivate him to attend therapy. I mentioned modification in many previous videos, five or six of them. Modification is such a window of opportunity for therapy. But modification is rare. The narcissist faces other types of life crisis which lead to therapy in the majority of cases, actually. And these are the five types that are likely to resolve in attending therapy. Number one, an ultimatum. An ultimatum or a requirement from family, employers or the courts. Narcissists are cowards. They react to ultimatums with capitulation. That's a rule of thumb, a heuristic, a golden rule. There's no exception.  This is as distinct from psychopaths. Psychopaths are actually fearless and reckless and exceedingly dangerous, especially when they are silent. So make the distinction between narcissists and psychopaths. Narcissists, classic narcissists are cowards. When they are faced with ultimatums, they capitulate and they obey. Now, the narcissist presenting in therapy as an outcome of an ultimatum or a court order and so on is likely to complain of very minor fringe issues. First of all, such a narcissist would deny a lack of self-awareness. He would say, I'm fully aware. I'm actually the most self-aware person I know. I know everything about myself. And when in this process when involved in this process of protestation, when trying to convince the therapist that is fully insightful, utterly aware of what he's doing and not doing and who he is, then and there emerges the essence of the narcissist. His unassuming naivete. His childlike features. When the narcissist tries to act or to emulate an adult, it is then that it is most evident how childlike he is. And it is heartbreaking. It is heart-rending to see the narcissist flailing about attempting to act as an adult would without the most basic skills and capabilities of an adult. There's a projection of blame and problems on to others. These are the alloplastic defences but even this is done in a kind of temper tantrum. A kind of sulking that is very typical of very young children around the age of two. So the narcissist caught in the crossfire in the cognitive resonance of being forced into therapy by ultimatums, circumstances consistently tries to self-enhance. He emphasizes the narcissistically sustained functioning of his disintegrating precariously balanced disorganized personality. Narcissist in therapy is typically more narcissistic, more grandiose, more in-your-faces, I would say even psychopathic, than outside the therapy setting, outside the clinic. There are fluctuations in vocational and professional performance in collaborative or interpersonal and intimate functioning. These are all the areas that require tackling in therapy. And yet the narcissist obstructs and resists and fights back because to admit any of this is to drive himself knowingly into modification. A skilled therapist, the therapist who knows what he's doing unfortunately has to enhance the pathologies of the narcissist before he is able to make any difference. He has to collude and collaborate with the narcissist's grandiosity and with his fantasy defense. Otherwise he will get nowhere. So it's a bit like a Gaussian distribution. The narcissist starts therapy at a low point having hit rock bottom coerced into the therapy by family, the courts. So he starts low. But then he reasserts his grandiosity. He reasserts his narcissism. He becomes defiant and reactant and consumatious and even reckless. He goes to a peak of narcissism. And then if the narcissist knows what he's doing if the therapist knows many therapists are narcissists if the therapist knows what he's doing he would bring down the narcissist from the apex to a low point which is now benign beneficial, self-effications helpful, eco-syntonic, feels good. Starts by feeling bad narcissistic defenses and then coming down to a plateau of reasonable contentment and functioning. This is when the narcissist is forced into therapy. But in the following four crises the narcissist attends therapy willingly.  Narcissist hits rock bottom and devoid of all his defenses, denuded of all his strategies nothing works he resorts to therapy. However the motivation to attend therapy is very wrong. The narcissist wants the therapist to fix him to make him a better functioning narcissist. He comes to the therapist he says these strategies used to work can you teach me how to apply them and implement them more efficiently? He wants the therapist to put him back together as he used to be and to restore his self-efficacy by teaching him a few tricks on how to be a more efficient narcissist. Maybe fly under the radar maybe to be more deceitful maybe to be more manipulative he wants to conspire with the therapist to collude with the therapist against the rest of the world as if the therapist is his personal advisor on how to obtain results and outcomes from other people by manipulating them better. Of course it's a wrong motivation and no questionable therapist would collaborate with any of this. But this is the motivation this is the presentation of the narcissist in therapy the narcissist denies having any major external problems. He refuses to acknowledge his inner emptiness meaninglessness dysphoria, inability to form or maintain close relationships social isolation, limitations inability to reach goals in personal or professional life. None of this narcissist would have none of this if he does admit to any of this he attributes these problems to a temporary hiatus or temporary crisis or a change in circumstances or a new environment and he usually would tend to blame others a lot of plastic defenses So even a narcissist who comes to therapy and says I feel empty my life is meaningless I'm depressed I can't work I can't maintain close relationships I keep getting abandoned and betrayed by my intimate partners I'm isolated I can't reach goals recently I'm not self-efficacious my professional life sucks my personal life don't ask Even a narcissist who admits to this list of shortcomings flaws problems, hindrances obstacles issues even such a narcissist would tend to embed this list of complaints decalpate the narcissist exonerate him remove him from the scene so to speak these are things that happen to the narcissist not things that he makes happen he is never guilty or responsible restoring an internal locus of control and a sense of responsibility guilt and even shame these are the primary tasks in therapy with the narcissist the narcissist has consistent a consistent kind of self-regulation which is pretty high functioning in interpersonal and vocational settings he has when he is able to obtain supply so as long as the stream of supply is uninterrupted the narcissist regulates pretty efficiently and he can remain and does remain high functioning even in interpersonal settings and in the workplace all narcissists have areas of success all of them are recognized for this or that so internal doubts self-criticism distancing detachment these circumstances they are circumstantial they are environmental what I am trying to say in short is that the narcissist main problem usually is a lack of supply even modification is about the abrupt withdrawal of positive supply and its replacement with negative supply these are all supply driven issues and topics and problems the focus should be on supply how to reduce or diminish the need for supply and how to regulate it more efficiently when the narcissist faces an acute crisis getting fired a vocational crisis financial crisis personal failures personal losses he reacts with outbursts of rage sexual dysfunction situational anxiety fear and above all it gets in touch with his reservoir of life-threatening shame this is a reaction to gradual corrosive life circumstances this is actually what we call narcissistic modification narcissistic modification is a life threat it leads to suicidal ideation to the other hand it's an amazing opportunity some would even say that it's worthwhile to modify the narcissist intentionally in order to induce healing later this is one of the philosophical pillars of cold therapy the treatment modality that I've developed now the next type of crisis which drives a narcissist to therapy is a mental disorder acute or gradual onset of some problem bipolar disorder depression, anxiety disorder major depression, anxiety disorder post-traumatic stress disorder some catastrophic event substance abuse when mental the mental functioning of the narcissist deteriorates considerably he reacts with depression, anxiety rage, modulability growing dependency on alcohol or drugs sudden memory flashbacks intrusive thoughts and obsession compulsion the narcissist tries to self-regulate he uses a self-enhancing function of mood elevation it's often via substances so he would drink or he would do coke to feel omnipotent and grandiose in some invincible so there is a reoccurrence of narcissistic trauma in a way sudden or gradual functional decline when the narcissist develops a comorbid severe mental health issue it's traumatizing and it usually drives him to therapy when he goes to therapy he would usually place an emphasis on the secondary mental health issue so he would place an emphasis on substance abuse or a mood disorder, his depression but he would refuse to acknowledge his narcissism narcissism is his walled-off firewall it's a fortress there are only two ways to penetrate these forces the only two roads leading to the force only draw bridges a grandiosity and fantasy therapists must accept this narcissism may be the only case in therapy where the therapist should actually encourage the pathology of the patient in order to be of any help at all and finally suicidality suicidal ideation suicidal attempts acute serious suicidal reoccupation or having survived a literally intended suicidal effort all these drive the narcissists to therapy recently I've made a video about why narcissists try to commit suicide this internal despair fear of a well-being shame and humiliation sense of worthlessness and of course the inevitable rage narcissists try to commit suicide when they are confronted with an external life crisis that threatens their fantastic inflated self-image job loss financial crisis, failed promotion divorce, loss of significant sustaining attachment crumbling or collapse of self-regulatory support, narcissistic supply which is deficient or vanishing modification, some subjective traumatic or severely humiliating experience that's known as modification, so all these may lead to suicidality now when you as an intimate partner of a narcissist when you notice any of the crisis that I've described, that's your opportunity he will be much weaker now, his defenses are down he's decompensating and you can convince him that therapy is the right way to go about it, it's a kind of acting out therapy would prove his battle, therapy would make him a man, therapy would enhance his grandiosity, it takes courage to attend therapy and confront yourself, you must rebuild his grandiosity and generate a fantasy where both of you attend therapy or even he alone attends therapy as a way back to his god-like status therapies would make sure this never happens but the narcissist has to be convinced that he is not entering therapy in order to be modified, to be changed, to be prevailed upon, to be rendered a conformist to be forced to conform the narcissist cherishes his freedom and independence to the point of counter dependency if there's a hint just a hint that someone is going to play with his mind, tinker with his brain or shrink it, forget about it the narcissist would become very psychopathic and walk away you need to convince the narcissist that he is doing it for you that it's good for the fantasy and it's going to make him great again


We are operating in a new cyber norm. This means you need to stay ahead of the cyber enemy and deny them any advantage. For four years, the Navy has been defending U.S. security in cyberspace through U.S. 10th Fleet and U.S. Cyber Command. These commands continue to expand network and cyber security, essentially making better shields in cyberspace. The new security includes websites and applications only accessible in the DOD information network or your dot mill domain. That means some of the sites and apps you used to be able to access at home may now only be available while you're at work. This may seem inconvenient, but it's one of many cyber shields used to protect you and your information. It's part of the new cyber norm. Remember, if the Navy gives you access to a keyboard, you are operating in the cyber domain. From the Defense Media Activity, I'm Petty Officer Tony Rosa.


Okay guys so I am back with another Destiny 2 video and today I want to talk about our new social space but before we go any further drop a like and a comment to me with a chance of winning my weekly giveaway details are on stream now. Okay so this new social space a place for us to chill on our lawnsums or in a fire team a place we store and collect loot a place we pick up bounties and quests basically our destiny two hubs the center of all what we do now we previously had the tower to do all of this for us but domini school or gary destroyed all of that along with all our precious loot so in destiny 2 we have a new social space and it's basically a farm with chickens running about and barns all over the place and we'll be storing our loot in sheds i'm guessing what the hell but on a serious note i love this idea let's face it we've had the tower for years now this change is basically the complete opposite and it is cool and in my opinion it is welcomed so this farm is located well due to gary destroying our home we have to travel beyond the safety of the city walls which no doubt have been destroyed we have to seek safety by going into the world and we end up here in the european dead zone which i'm pretty sure bunch of said was the biggest environment they've ever made in any game ever which is crazy so why here why this farm out in the world well it's obvious we need to travel as lights but with domini school draining that light it's quite apparent it's having an effect on our guidance so when we are seeking refuge there's already an idea in everyone's head we need to find this shard which is what we do which was discarded from the traveler during the collapse of the golden age so a piece of the traveler is out there and we find it this is where we start retreating and rally together within this new social space now this shard has been in destiny's lore since i can remember and it's epic that we actually get into experience more of the lore within destiny too okay so more about this social space and what it offers now the tarot like i said was like the hub of destiny one this farm i believe will be the exact same so to speak with faction vendors a cryptarch which i have spotted and we'll show you guys in a second as well as fun things to do as a fire team more than just dance parties and trying to glitch enable i believe this new social space will be the home of new characters who will help us on our journey characters such as hawfun who was born in the city hawfun actually left as a teen to seek a life of freedom in the wilderness outside the safety of the wolves she survived for years outside of guardians protection and has come to learn her true purpose to provide shout out to humanity by helping them not only survive but lead a better way of life now as well as hawfun i'm guessing we will meet and interact with many new characters which i can't wait for so what factions will be within this farm what vendors now it's obvious we will get a vanguard and a crucible vendor that's basically completely pointless to mention but will any old factions be making a return and i can say that they will be we will see the return of dead orbit future will call and new monarchy as weapons and armors from these factions can be seen within the trailers of destiny too now there are plenty of new armors and weapons that have been seen but putting names on them and relating them to factions at this precise moment in time is just guessing and i ain't going to do that now as well as new monarchy dead orbit and future walkhole will there be any new factions within this farm who knows but i'd probably guess yes now this farm will also be the home to the cryptarch seen in this snippet here but only for a split second which many people missed we also get vault space again which was pretty obvious but we also get and this is the best part people our very own small football field which i cannot wait to play on no doubt there's going to be secrets here and there too within this farm so the european dead zone near the shard of the traveler on this farm we find our new refuge our destiny to social hub the center of our game and that is it guys for another video i hope you enjoyed it if you did do smash that like button i do appreciate the support if you're new around here and enjoy daily destiny videos be sure to subscribe if you never want to miss a video of mine hit that bell button next to that subscribe button to receive email notifications of when i upload if you want to interact with me and other social media sites links are in the video description but thanks as always for stopping by and i will see you on that next one


Therefore, now time for question period. The member for Tadham Kent Essex. Thank you very much, speaker. My question is to the Premier. Parents shouldn't have to worry whether their child will come home at the end of the day. As of today, Ottawa has experienced 57 shootings, its highest ever. The frequency and public nature of these recent shootings is unacceptable, speaker, and it has to stop. Ottawa's police work extremely hard, but in the 2016 budget, the Liberal government, which included the former Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services from Ottawa, cut the Ottawa Police Anti-Gang Program taking police officers off the streets. Mr. Speaker, the impact has been clear. Why did the Liberals cut funding to this vital program that helped keep the streets of Ottawa safe? Thank you. Well, thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, and I believe the Attorney General may want to weigh in on this. But let me just say, Mr. Speaker, that, of course, any violent act, any harm that's done to a citizen, a resident of this province, anywhere, Mr. Speaker, is unacceptable and it's up to communities and government to do everything that we can to prevent that kind of violence, which is exactly why, Mr. Speaker, we have increased police funding. We created the Pavis funding, Mr. Speaker, and made those investments across the province. So the efforts of local police services and other safety partners have resulted in Ontario having among the lowest police reported crime rates in all of Canada for the past decade. But, Mr. Speaker, the money that has been invested, we need to make sure that that money is invested in the right way. Member from the PN Carlton will come to our sentence, please. The provincial anti-violence intervention strategy, which is what the member is talking about, has been reinvested. I'll say more in the supplementary, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, supplementary. Thank you, Speaker. 57 shootings and it keeps getting higher. Back to the Premier's Speaker, Liberals continue to underfund mental health services as well as de-escalation training, forcing police officers to become de facto frontline mental health workers. While Ottawa is a great place to live, work, and raise a family, we can do better and we must do better. Order. Parents shouldn't have to worry whether their child will come home at the end of the day. Mr. Speaker, there have been a record number of shootings in Ottawa this year. The year the Liberals cut funding to the anti-gang and anti-gun violence program. In fact, the Ottawa Police Association President, Max Goff said, and I quote, it's well known to these gang, excuse me, it's well known to those engaging in criminal activity that the unit isn't around when the cut is emboldening gang members. Mr. Speaker, will the Premier explain the liberal priorities and why they should cut this program? Well, thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And as I was saying, the funding for the provincial anti-violence intervention strategy program has been reinvested, Mr. Speaker. It is now with local police boards to determine how to allocate that funding, Mr. Speaker. And, you know, 55 million dollars we've invested, 4 million of that has gone to Ottawa. Mr. Speaker, what we need is that money to be targeted at the programs that work, the strategies that work, Mr. Speaker, working with community agencies, coordinating that work, Mr. Speaker, so that there's a prevention strategy in place as well as reacting to violent incidents. That money has been reinvested, Mr. Speaker. The police boards are now able to allocate those dollars, and we're very, very convinced that police on the ground will continue to improve those prime statistics, Mr. Speaker, as they have been doing for a decade. Thank you. Final supplementary. Thank you, Speaker. It's ironic that she talks about allocating funds back to the Premier. The Liberals have spent 4 million dollars on the salary of the new Hydro-1 CEO. They wasted 70 million dollars on a failed ORPP. They canceled gas plants for 1.1 billion dollars, and last week they spent 12 million dollars on high-speed or rather high-priced consultants and promotional ads instead of low-income families struggling to pay their Hydro bills. Meanwhile, they're cutting the very funding that keeps our streets safe, and that must change. I question, allocating funds? Mr. Speaker, will the Liberals restore their short-sighted cut to the Ottawa Anti-Gang and Gun Violence program? Thank you. Attorney General. Thank you very much, Speaker. I'm very happy to answer this question, because let me get some facts absolutely clear. First of all, Pavis program has not been cut, Speaker. Second of all, the funding for Ottawa Police Service under this government has actually gone up. It's gone up, Speaker, just last year by $300,000. Speaker, in fact, this is the government which has been undoing the download that the previous progressive concept of government has done by downloading core security costs to municipalities. Finish, please. It's clear. When it hurts, they shout back. Speaker, this is the government that has uploaded that core security cost to make sure that our municipalities and our police service in Ottawa, in particular, have more resources available to them. Yes, sir. Our police chief, Shal Bodlow, and our men and women of our Ottawa Police Service are extremely hardworking and they're working hard to make sure that Ottawa remains a safe city. Thank you. Thank you. Any questions for the member from Duffin-Cowden? My question is for the Premier. On October 3rd, my leader and I visited, yes, I can, nursery school, which provides unique programs for children with autism. We heard from the school that they will no longer receive funding from the government and have called on the government to restore their funding. Both my leader and I have repeatedly called on the government to reverse this cut. I understand the Minister of Education has finally agreed to meet with yes, I can. Will the government be offering sustainable funding for yes, I can at this meeting? Good question. Social Minister of Education, early years in childcare. Social Minister. Thank you so much, Mr. Speaker, and thank you so much for that question. You know, I want to point out that our government is proud of the initiatives that we are undertaking to give children the best start in life. And we are definitely committed to the early years of a child's life. We want to make sure that everyday life is easier for our children and for families across Ontario. That's why we're moving forward with 100,000 new spaces over the next five years. Let me talk a little bit about yes, I can and the funding that they've been receiving over the last few years. We have been supporting them through the municipalities fund that goes to the City of Toronto. However, they did get one-time transitional funding to help them come up with a sustainable plan when it comes to finances. But their funding was one-time transitional funding in order to allow them to develop an adequate and sustainable financial position and that funding is over with. Thank you, supplementary. You know, the reality is if this funding is not restored, they have two choices. They will eliminate the program or they will ask parents who have children with special needs to pay more. Which is it, Minister? Are you asking parents to pay more simply because their child has a special need or do you want this program shut down? That is the answer. Thank you very much for that question. And again, we do fund childcare in this province but we do it through a very strict set of rules. Here's what we're doing. We're moving more than a billion dollars a year towards childcare funding. That funding moves, thank you. That funding moves to municipalities and what that means essentially in this instance is there is funding and sustainable funding that is going to the, yes I can, nursery care, nursery school at $300,000. $300,000 of funding. If that community feels and if the parents they feel that isn't enough and if the daycare and nursery feels it isn't enough, they should be having that conversation with their municipality and also with the local managers who are making those decisions. What I can tell you is that they have been receiving the funding, they will be receiving the funding over the next year, $300,000. This government has been attacking families of children with autism for years. You've taken them to court.  Start the clock. First to the chair, to the chair please and come to order. Thank you. The government doesn't want to hear this but it is the reality on the ground in Ontario if you have a child with autism. They've threatened to kick their children off the IVI wait list. Will the Premier finally show some support to families with children and reinstate sustainable funding to yes I can nursery school? The chair please. Thank you. Associate Minister. I want to get back to the fact that yes we have doubled the funding to over a billion dollars a year. We provide funding to the City of Toronto who then funds a number of local childcare programs including yes I can nursery school at $300,000. We know that yes I can nursery provides valuable services to families. There is a meeting set up on October 31st with officials to discuss the plan and the way forward. Our past support to yes I can nursery school was one time transitional funding. We encourage yes I can nursery school to continue to work with its local municipality to continue its great service across the GTA. Our government is committed to ensuring that every child has access to the supports they need to succeed, including students here at yes I can nursery school. Thank you very much. That's a great question. The member from Toronto Danforth. Thank you Speaker. Speaker, my question to the Premier. Does the Premier have an internal estimate of what Ontarians could end up paying for the Liberal decision to try and cancel the $5.5 billion contract signed with Windstream? Thank you. Premier. Minister of Energy. Minister of Energy. Thank you Mr. Speaker. I'd like to thank the Honourable Member for the question. When it relates to the Windstream, the tribunal decision Mr. Speaker, we have 20 days to review the entire decision and we are working with our federal counterparts Mr. Speaker to ensure that we look at all issues that are relating to this Mr. Speaker. We are very concerned as we would be Mr. Speaker and doing our due diligence is very important and so that's what we will continue to do over the next 20 days or the total 20 days Mr. Speaker. We will work with our federal counterparts and we will work with our lawyers to determine what steps are next. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Mr. Speaker, I did ask a very different question but nonetheless, I spent months on the gas plant committee getting to the bottom of how the Liberals wasted $1.1 billion by putting the interests of the Liberal Party ahead of people in Ontario struggling to pay their hydro bills. When Liberals and Conservatives signed private energy contracts it means Ontarians are locked in to paying the profits of those private energy companies. What we learned in the gas plant scandal is that when Liberal politicians cancel those private contracts people still end up on the hook for paying those profits. How much are Ontarians going to have to pay because Liberals signed a $5.5 billion private energy contract with Windstream? How much? Thank you Mr. Speaker. I don't think that the member is hearing what we're saying. We have a 20 day moratorium in which we have to work with our federal counterparts to review the decision and that's what we're doing Mr. Speaker. We're carefully reviewing that decision and we're going to continue to work with Canada because we believe that they're doing the same Mr. Speaker. Our decision to place a moratorium on offshore wind is when our government still believes it is correct Mr. Speaker. And so we're taking this cautious approach to offshore wind which includes finalizing research to make sure that we are protective of both human health and of the environment Mr. Speaker. So we've been advised of the tribunal's decision in the NAFTA Chapter 11 dispute between US based Windstream Energy, LLC and Canada Mr. Speaker. And I think it's important to state that the tribunal dismissed the majority of claims with the final 25 million award being significantly less but we'll continue to work with Canada on this Mr. Speaker. Final supplementary. Man talk about avoiding the question. Speaker, canceling the gas plants cost Ontarians over a billion dollars because the Liberals signed private power contracts. Selling hydro one will cost Ontarians because the Liberals are handing it over to private owners. Now because the Liberals signed a 5.5 billion dollar private wind contract Ontarians could be on the hook for paying 20 years of profits with zero years of electricity. Let's be honest, if this had been a public project that had been canceled, we would be on the hook for those items that had been purchased because it's a for profit project Ontarians could be on the hook for billions of dollars in profits. Our Ontarians looking at the gas plant scandal all over again. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Let me once again be very clear that we are reviewing the decision. We have 20 days to do so and we'll continue to do so in the member's member opposite's question. He's being very speculative Mr. Speaker and you know what, for us on this side let's talk about some of the facts when it comes to renewable energy Mr. Speaker. We have 18,000 megawatts of renewable energy online. We are one of the best in North America when it comes to renewable contracts Mr. Speaker. We are very proud that we've eliminated coal. We've invested in renewables Mr. Speaker. We don't have to send out warnings anymore about smog days Mr. Speaker so people can go outside and breathe appropriately. You know what Mr. Speaker, we're very proud of our record on this side of the house and when it comes to win stream Mr. Speaker we're going to continue work with the federal government to look at all aspects and do our due diligence. Thank you very much Mr. Speaker. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Give a question to the member from Nicobel. Mr. Speaker. Thank you Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Premier. Figuring out the sale price of e-health and other health assets will take expert. Ed Clark cannot do that alone. My question is simple. How much has been spent on consultant and how many members of the public service have been used to build a case to privatize our e-health assets? Thank you. Mr. Health and long term care. Mr. Health long term care. Well thank you Mr. Speaker. I real on a Monday morning I just love getting questions like this because as we've said so many times there are no plans to sell e-health. We will not be selling or privatizing e-health or any of its components. The simple reason why we've asked Ed Clark to do this value for money review is so as we move forward to there's a very real deadline where the current mandate of e-health is due to expire at the end of next year. We are in a completely changed environment with regards to the opportunities for digital health whether that's the consumer facing side of it or even looking at how much we've built up e-health in the past decade in this province. It's responsible I think and my caucus and I think Ontarians would agree for us to look at what we have created in this province. We have national bodies that have told us there's immense value in what we've created. We want to articulate that explicitly. Thank you. Supplementary. Thank you Speaker. It is entirely possible that the Liberal government has been working on privatizations plans for the last 11 months and I have a feeling they're not quite done. When the Premier decided to sell Hydro One, Ontarian got stuck with a seven million dollar bill for secret consultant contracts. Now I'm asking how much has been budgeted and how much has been spent on consultant to privatize some or all of e-health. Thank you. Thank you. So I don't know how many times I can say this e-health is not for sale Mr. Speaker and I know that they weren't satisfied with us repeating that numerous times last week that e-health and its components are not for sale including the intellectual property and how we've built that up successfully over the past decade but obviously not being satisfied with that response. Now they've gone into a deeper conspiracy that somehow we've been planning this in the past. Mr. Speaker, we have not invested funds to privatize e-health to consider privatizing e-health because we are not privatizing e-health Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Final supplementary. Selling hydro one is making life harder for every Ontarian and every business who pays a hydro bill but for a high price consultant it is a red letter day speaker. Will the premier release the list of consultants working for Ed Clark to do value for money review or to leverage e-health assets? Thank you. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Well Mr. Speaker once again e-health is not for sale it will not be privatized and also the patient records that are part of that that's part of the aspect of e-health which will not be privatized it will not be monetized Mr. Speaker. We take it very serious I can tell them one individual that Ed Clark will be consulting with and that's the information and privacy commissioner Mr. Speaker. Thank you. New question. The member from Nipissing. Thank you and good morning Mr. Speaker. My question is for the premier. Somehow this government keeps finding new ways to waste taxpayer money without ever delivering anything. 12 million on consultants no hydro relief 70 million no pension plan 308 million on OLG nothing to show for it 1.1 billion on gas plants no gas plan. This government even wastes money doing nothing at all I asked the premier why do you keep wasting millions of dollars delivering nothing in return? No one in the house this morning has asked a question about the Ontario-Quebec energy agreement Mr. Speaker. The other side of the house that Ontario and Quebec work together we are working together Mr. Speaker and working with Quebec to get that power that clean Quebec power Mr. Speaker will save 70 million dollars over seven years Mr. Speaker that's just one of the things in the list of things that we are doing to take... The member from Renford she's talented enough to make you sound loud that's her issue. One of the things Mr. Speaker that we are doing to take costs out of the system and Mr. Speaker to reduce greenhouse gas emissions it's good news I'm surprised nobody's mentioned it. Speaker families across Ontario are suffering because of this government's decisions we now learn this government once again wasted millions of taxpayer dollars in exchange for nothing. This time their political decision on wind energy put Ontario taxpayers on the hook for another 28 million dollars. Families are now expected to pay for a wind project that was never even built. This is yet another example Speaker of this government's waste mismanagement and scandal. So I'll ask the Premier again why do you keep wasting millions of taxpayer dollars that delivers nothing in return? Thank you. So Mr. Speaker I alone of this question and from the substance quite frankly that the member opposite would be supportive of the Quebec Ontario agreement that was signed on Friday Mr. Speaker and let me just talk a little bit about what that is. Under the agreement Ontario can import up to two terawatts of power and just for context Mr. Speaker that's enough power to power the city of Kitchener for a year. So it's a massive amount of electricity power Mr. Speaker that is part of this deal and this agreement will reduce electricity system costs for consumers by about 70 million dollars. That's 10 million dollars a year for seven years Mr. Speaker. And as I said that is just one of the things that we are doing to take costs out of the system. I heard someone over on the other side heckle about making Quebec great. Mr. Speaker if Quebec is great Ontario is great Canada is great. Thank you. I start the clock. New question. The member from Nicobel. Thank you Mr. Speaker my question is for the Premier. In this beautiful province of ours we should be able to provide quality care to senior living in long-term care homes but that's not happening today Speaker. Arthur Jones moved in a private for-profit long-term care home. Soon after he suffered from malnutrition dehydration he felt repeatedly he developed a huge bed soar he spent his final weeks in hospital and is creating pain. My question is simple. How can this happen in Ontario? That's right. Mr. Health in long-term care. Mr. Health long-term care. Well Mr. Speaker the member opposite knows as Ontarians need to know that the safety and well-being of our seniors wherever they might call home is of paramount priority to me as Minister of Health and to this government and while the member also knows that I can't comment on the specifics of this case but I can't even begin to imagine the challenge that the challenge that the family has gone through as a result of this but let me be absolutely clear that we have a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to abuse or neglect. Again wherever that might take place and there are many, many Ontarians that call long-term care homes their home and it is their home and their residence Mr. Speaker so we continue to work with the various oversight bodies responsible for regulating our health professionals to make sure that that safety is provided. Supplementary. Words are not enough Speaker. We need action. We need big changes in long-term care because Mr. Jones is not alone. His family is part of a lawsuit with 82 other families against this one private for-profit care home chain. The Liberal government has had plenty of opportunity to act. Families have been demanding change for many years. The coroner after investigating multiple homicide told this government that more staff was needed to provide bedside care. Frontline workers are asking for a guaranteed minimum standard of care so this does not continue to happen over and over again. What will it take for this government to finally step up to the plate and prevent anyone else from suffering the indignity and pain that Mr. Jones had to go through in this for-profit long-term care home chain? Minister of Health. Thank you Mr. Speaker and you know in 2014 we implemented a measure where every single long-term care home in this province would be rigorously inspected and in 2014 100% of long-term care homes were inspected and again in 2015 100% of long-term care homes were inspected. Now we've looked and the Auditor General has provided us with very sound advice for how we can further strengthen that regime by targeting those long-term care homes where challenges or problems have been identified Mr. Speaker but I know the member opposite has a private member's bill with regards to minimum hours of care that actually runs against the expert panel and the work of the Sharkey report several years ago in 2008 which recommended against specific minimum hours because every patient is unique and different. We need to make sure the long-term care homes plan for the level of services that each individual needs and we expect that Mr. Speaker. Thank you. We're questioning the members from our Fumble and Quincy level. Well thank you Speaker. My question is a Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Minister Ontario celebrated the outstanding performance of our Olympic athletes with a contribution of 15 of the Team Canada top 22 medals including four gold, two silver and nine bronze. More than half of Ontario athletes in Rio also competed in the Toronto 2015 Pan Am Games and at the benefit of experiencing competition in high-pressure international multi-sports event. The Rio Olympics are one example of how the Toronto 2015 Pan Am Games legacy is translating to outstanding performances in the global stage. I also had the privilege of seeing Penny Olsiak at 16 make history as first Canadian swimmer to win four medals in single summer games. Penny also sent an Olympic record of 52.70 seconds in the woman's 100 meter freestyle and became the first athlete born in the 21st century to win a sport. Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Thank you Mr. Speaker. I'd like to thank the hardworking member for his question. Last summer, Ontario athletes won 109 Pan Am medals and 63 Parapan Am medals. 45% of all medals won by Team Canada. We welcome the world to our province and successfully hosted the largest, most accessible and the most transparent multi-sport games in Canadian history. The game showcased Ontario at its best to an international audience, attracting tourists, jobs and new business investments. More than one million tickets were sold in 15 municipalities. 10 new internationally certified sport venues and 15 renovated venues were built in places like Minden, Milton, North York, Scarborough, Atobico, Caledon, Markham and Hamilton and even North Bay. Yes, North Bay, Speaker, benefited too. The venues during the games were shipped to North Bay for a world-class volleyball facility there. Above all, Speaker, we're going to continue making these kinds of investments because they inspire athletes like Penny Alexiuk and the next generation and, Speaker, that is priceless. Thank you very much. Thank you to the minister, Speaker. It is fantastic how wide reaching and how successful our government's investments in games have been. This year, Ontario investment of $16.76 million towards Ontario athletes and sporting events, helping athletes reach the highest level international competition and support the ongoing operation of key sporting venues. This year, 49 Ontario athletes were part of the Canadian team that competed in 19 of 23 sports. Ontario contributes to four of Team Canada's top 29 medals, helping Canada finish 14 in overall medal standing. These athletes are an inspiration for future athletes and role models for all. Mr. Speaker, through you to the minister, can you tell the members of this House about how Ontario supports our athletes? I am. Thank you, minister. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to again thank the member from Northumberland, Quinney West for his question. You know, Speaker, it's always a joy to stand in this House and talk about our support for our amazing athletes. Currently in its 10th year, Ontario's Quest for Gold program offers 9.76 million to our athletes, including 6.36 million in direct funding directly to athletes, over 1,200 of them, Speaker, and 3.4 million this year through sport organizations to enhance coaching, training, and competitive opportunities. The province has also contributed an additional $7 million towards the Toronto 2015 Sport Legacy Fund, which is helping the long-term development of amateur sport by supporting the ongoing operation and maintenance of key legacy facilities of the games, including the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre, the Madame National Cycling Centre, and the Pan Am and Parapan Athlete Stadium at York University. Ontario's 7 million in the Toronto 2015 Sport Legacy Fund brings the total provincial investment in the fund to $12 million, something we can all be proud of, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Your question, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry. Mr. Speaker, I hand-delivered to the minister more than 1,000 petitions signed by people in my riding who are concerned over the lack of clarity of what's being proposed under the Niagara Scarpment Expansion Plan for Bruce Gray-Own Sound. It's a proposal that no one seems to be able to wrap their head around. If the plan goes forward, Great County municipalities will lose $700,000 per year in tax revenues. It's a huge loss, and this is why the Warden and Great County Council and Mayor and Council of Meeford, as well as other neighbouring municipalities, have called on the minister to abandon the proposal. So my question is simple. Will the minister heed the feedback from the majority response in my riding, which is to draw the NEC Expansion Proposal for Bruce Gray-Own Sound? Thank you. Minister of Natural Resources. Thank you very much, Speaker, and thank you very much for the member for that important question. And as a member knows, Mr. Speaker, Ontario is undergoing right now a coordinated land-use planning event that many, many municipalities are being asked to weigh in on, including the Niagara escarpment plan. So certainly this is something that I've been in contact with many municipalities about. I had many delegations at the recent AMO conference, and this has been up on the environmental registry to be able to gather good comments from not only municipalities, stakeholders, landholders, and the like. So this is an area where all of us working together are going to be coming together with a plan that respects the landowners, that does protect our essential lands that we need to do for biodiversity and other environmental reasons in the future. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Speaker. Back to the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry. I respect your ministries trying to sort through it, but it's a little too late. With seven days left until consultation's end, the proposal seems to be too much for anyone to handle, which is why complaints continue to pour into her office every day. A thousand people have given you their comments. They don't want this to happen. Mr. Speaker, the minister knows she is under no obligation to push this through, especially when there's so much confusion and lack of information with the overall impact of adding 45,000 hectares under the NEC jurisdiction. Again, the only certainty is that this proposal will cost these rural municipalities and the people who live in this land almost a million dollars in lost tax revenues. And so through you, Speaker, I ask, will the minister stay true to her word? She promised meaningful consultations. This is her opportunity to prove what meaningful means. Will she end the mass confusion by dropping the NEC expansion proposal for Bruce Gray on that? Thank you, minister. Well, thank you very much, speaker. And I thank the member opposite for the supplementary question. And again, I'd like to reiterate that the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry is working very well with the other partner ministries at the moment, including municipal affairs in order to look at the issues around the coordinated land use plan of Ontario. And that includes the four provincial land use plans. The second round of public consultation is still going on, speaker, until October 31st. So my ministry and others are still gathering comments on the proposed plans. So I encourage those that are interested to continue to put their comments on the environmental registry before October 31st, after which my ministry will be looking at those very thoughtfully, coordinating with other partner ministries and coming up with proposing amendments to the Niagara escarpment plan, which again is upon the registry right now for review and comment. We will be continuing to work closely with our partners and stakeholders in Ontario to ensure that the coordinated land use plan moves ahead in an appropriate and a balanced way for all. Thank you. Thank you. Good question, the member from London. Thank you, speaker. My question is to the Premier. A new forum research poll shows that two thirds of Ontarians support the NDP's plan to remove interest from student loans. They agree that post-secondary education should be a path to a brighter future with many opportunities, not a path to years and years of debt that delay young people from starting a home, starting a family and other life milestones. Does the Premier agree with two thirds of Ontarians that interest should be removed from student loans? I agree. We have advanced education skills development. Minister of Education. Well, speaker, we are in fact eliminating debt for many thousands of students. We are moving forward with the most ambitious reform of student assistance in North America and we are very excited about the opportunities that we'll bring to students across this province, because we absolutely believe that access to post-secondary education should be based on your ability to learn your hard work, not on your ability to pay, speaker. So I absolutely expect the member opposite and the party opposite to support us as we move forward bringing in the new reformed OSAP, speaker. Thank you. What's up, hon. Speaker? Speaker, too many young people in Ontario are graduating and unable to enter the careers they dream of. Instead, they can't find work or they end up underemployed in jobs that do not leverage their skills and talents. After four years of university, young people in Ontario who rely on financial assistance are graduating with average debt loads of $28,000 and that doesn't include the private loans that many students also carry. We have reached a tipping point in this province and young people deserve better. My question to the Premier is, why does her Liberal government think that it is okay to profit from interest charge on student debt? If two-thirds of Ontarians support interest-free student loans, why doesn't the Premier? Thank you, Minister. Well, Speaker, let me repeat, we are actually eliminating debt for many, many thousands of students. 150,000 students will have grants that are higher than their tuition. Speaker, that's how very students support the... I think we're all on the same page. We want students to be able to go on to post-secondary education without worrying about the financial cost. We have an important message to get out to students across this province, Speaker, and I'm gonna talk to the students in the gallery today. You can go on to post-secondary education. You don't need to worry about the money. I meant it when I said, no, you're not. All questions and answers get put to the chair. Armed chair, not needed. New question, a member from Kingston in the islands. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Government and Consumer Services. On July 1st, 1867, three colonies, the province of Canada, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia joined together to become the Dominion of Canada. Next year, we will be celebrating the 150th anniversary of Ontario as a province within this great country. I think we can all agree that we're lucky to live in this province and that we're looking forward to celebrating Ontario's rich and vibrant history. The Archives of Ontario will be of special service next year, providing us all with extensive and exceptional documentation of our collective history. Will the Minister inform the House of the Archives plan to celebrate Ontario 150? Minister of Government and Consumer Services. Merci, Mr. President. I want to say thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On the island for that question, Ontario's 150th anniversary provided us with a great opportunity to reflect on our shared past. Just last month, I had the pleasure of visiting the Archives at office at York University to see the Family Ties exhibit. It explores the era of confederation and how family lived during that time. The exhibit features a display on Chief Shinkwalk. And I'd say, Mr. Speaker, this is very important in particularly moving story on the impact of confederation on Indigenous people. Speaker, I also would like to add that this Archives of Ontario exhibit is free of charge and an exceptional place to take the entire family. Answer. Mr. President, I encourage all Ontarians. I invite all people of Ontario to visit the Archives. Thank you, supplementary. I want to thank the Minister for her information on the Archives of Ontario and its Ontario 150 plans. I know that in my writing of Kingston and the Islands, we have a robust appreciation for our history as evidenced in our city's motto, where history and innovation thrive. And I can tell you that we are very much looking forward to Ontario's 150th. In addition to its fascinating exhibits and displays, the Archives of Ontario provide the people of this province with important services. It is also an important institution that the government frequently relies on. Can the Minister please speak to the significance of the Archives of Ontario? Thank you, Minister. Thank you again to the member of Kingston and the Islands for the question. Mr. Speaker, since 1903, the Archives of Ontario has been the source of information about the history of the province and its people. The Archives of Ontario houses both public and private records, including 106,000 metres of text records, 4.4 million photographs, and 4 terabytes of electronic records. It's through this wide selection of public records that the Archives can create exhibitions such as Family Ties. Mr. Speaker, for all that cannot make it to Toronto, the Archives of Ontario maintain an incredible amount of resources online. The Archives also offering traveling curriculum-linked workshop at schools. Mr. Speaker, the Archives of Ontario gives us a chance to reflect upon our past and to remind ourselves of how fortunate we all are to live in this great province. Thank you. New question? Mr. Speaker, the member from Hallam and Norfolk. Mr. Speaker, to the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Mural Affairs, the Ontario Chamber of Commerce recently reported serious pressures on our agri-food sector, rising input costs, foreign competition. Dairy farmers of Ontario are here today. The Chamber laments the dramatic 333 percent increase in electricity prices from 4.7 kWh back in 2004 to today's 18 cents at peak. That makes it very expensive to provide lighting, cooling, to run pumps and milking machines in a modern dairy operation. The Ontario Chamber issued government a call to action. Will the Minister tell dairy farmers here today what action he will take on these pressing problems? Mr. President, I want to thank my friend, the Honourable Member from Hallam and Norfolk, for his question about the dairy industry in the province of Ontario. You know, Mr. Speaker, I had the opportunity to meet with representatives of the DFO this morning, including Will Vanderhurst, who's a director from my wonderful riding at Peterborough. But it's interesting, the message that was given to me by the dairy farmers of Ontario is somewhat different than what's just articulated by the member from Hallam and Norfolk. They happen to tell me that the dairy industry in Ontario has never been in better shape, Mr. Speaker. In fact, just recently, because of the expansion of the dairy industry, the province of Ontario, they just released 6 percent more dairy quota in the province of Ontario, because dairy farmers are growing in Ontario, Mr. Speaker. Well, Minister, that's not my words. The Ontario Chamber, their report, it's titled Curtile Ground, also highlighted the regulatory burden facing agribusiness. As they've indicated, policies are not evidence-based. They're not transparent. They're not unbiased. There's a lack of homogenization, provincially and federally. How do dairy farmers, for example, understand and navigate and comply with such a schmozzle? One farm operation told us they typically respond to two or three EBR postings a year, but last year they responded to more than 20. These things take time. They're often, it's in the middle of hanging or working up ground or spreading manure. Again, what action is the minister taking to cut the unnecessary rules and regulation? The red tape, the bureaucratic red tape, the paperwork is formed to fill up. Remind the member when I stand you sit. Minister of Agriculture. Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the honourable member for a supplementary question, but let's really look at the facts of agriculture in the province of Ontario. $36.6 billion to Ontario's GDP. 790,000 Ontarians are employed in this sector every year. Last year, Fargate receipts in 2015 were $12 billion in the province of Ontario. Mr. Speaker, that's $12 billion. By and large, all sectors of Ontario's agriculture sector are growing each and every year. We're well on our way to meet the previous goal of 120,000 new jobs in this industry by the year 2020, and around the world, Ontario's food has the best reputation on an international basis. Thank you. Can you see it, please? New question, member from Essex. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Speaker, this government defines a strong library system as, quote, a cornerstone of a strong community that contributes to education, literacy, and lifelong learning for Ontario residents. Yet for over 100 days, the people in my riding of Essex have been out without their library services due to a strike. We've reached a tipping point in Essex. What has the Premier been doing and what can she do to get library services to the people of Essex back up and running? Thank you, Premier. Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I want to thank the Honourable Member for his question. You know, Speaker, here on this side of the House, we value the contributions of public libraries in building strong and vibrant communities right across our province. We recognize them as essential gathering places for culture and learning and exchanges and technology. In fact, New Canadians flock to our libraries because they understand that they are an opportunity to engage in a wider community of conversation. Of course, the Honourable Member asks about the specific situation in Essex. I can't comment on an ongoing Labour dispute. I think the Honourable Member knows that. But I'm happy to talk with him offline if there's some specific situation analysis he wants to offer or some problems or answers to the specific issue that he wishes to pursue. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. But all in all, on this side of the House, Speaker, support for our libraries remains an integral part of building Ontario up and that support is going to continue. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Speaker. Speaker, I've met with local councillors to encourage a resolution. I've been to the line. New Democrats have a plan for good jobs where workers can get sick and not have to fight for time off and support the idea that strikes and lockouts shouldn't drag on indefinitely. We implore the Minister to intervene on this issue. She should get involved and extend all the resources that she can through her ministry to find a solution as soon as possible. We cannot wait another day in Essex. We shouldn't have to wait another 200 days or two years to get this thing resolved. Will the Minister extend her resources, her support to those who are on strike to facilitate a resolution to this strike? Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As I mentioned in my earlier comment, our government values the contributions of public libraries in building strong and vibrant communities across our province. In this particular instance, I encourage the employer in the union to make every effort to resolve their differences at the bargaining table, and it's important that we don't interfere in this process. Ontario has an excellent record of dispute resolution. In fact, 98% of all agreements are reached without strikes and lockouts. We are confident that by working together, the two parties can reach a settlement. As I mentioned earlier, we believe strongly in the dispute resolution process. We urge the parties to continue to stay at the bargaining table and we offer that as comment on this particular situation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. My question is for the Minister of Education. Ensuring students receive the best possible education not only in my writing of Barry, but all across Ontario is our government's top priority. As an MPP and as an educator, I know Ontario has a lot to be proud of in terms of student achievement. Thanks in large part to our great educators and other staff. Just this morning, our government announced additional funding dedicated to build new schools and expand existing ones across Ontario. Speaker, through you to the Minister, what is the Ontario Government doing to ensure students are learning in buildings that can better support their achievement and well-being? Thank you, Minister of Education. Thank you, Speaker, and I want to thank the member for her question. I know how hard she is working on behalf of her constituents. Mr. Speaker, investing in our schools is one of the most important infrastructure investments that we can make for close to 2 million students here in Ontario. Since 2004, we've invested more than $15 billion in infrastructure, including nearly 760 new schools and more than 735 additions and renovations. This past June, we've announced an additional $1.1 billion investment over the next two years to fund school renewal. Ontario is making the largest investment in public infrastructure in our province's history. We're providing school boards across Ontario with more than $12 billion over 10 years. We continue to support school boards across Ontario to ensure all students have safe and healthy learning environments so that they can reach their full potential. Thank you, Minister. We are extremely proud of the investments made towards education. These investments will help build new schools in areas of high growth, including Southbury, improve schools and invest in projects to reduce surplus space through consolidation. It is important that we continue to support school boards in maintaining and improving the condition of Ontario schools. Minister, can you please tell us more about what the school boards will be able to achieve with the additional funding announced this morning? Thank you, Minister. Thank you, Speaker. I want to thank the school boards in providing modern and stimulating learning environments for our students. Just this morning at Coorslet Public School in Scarborough Southwest, we announced that Ontario is investing $474 million this year to build 28 new schools and expand and renovate 23 existing ones. We're making this investment in 51 schools in 36 communities to address demand in areas of high population growth to replace schools that are in poor condition. Giving students the best possible learning environment, high quality and modern buildings is part of our plan to build Ontario up and deliver on our top priority growing the economy and creating jobs. Mr. Speaker, Amy, a Grade II student in Mrs. Reynolds class said, thank you, Premier for investing in our schools and in our students. Thank you. Good question. My question is to the Premier. Premier, provincial agencies have specific timelines for submitting and tabling annual reports. Over the past three years of the 57 government agencies examined by the Auditor General 95% missed the deadline. Further investigation, it was made clear that in most cases, the annual report has been delivered to the Minister but has languished for months or even years on the Minister's desk. In the name of transparency what steps have been taken to refresh this process and to provide annual reports in a timely manner to the legislature? Thank you. I can tell you that this is something that has been addressed by our cabinet. It's something that we are working with agencies and boards to make sure that those annual reports are received in a timely manner. I agree with the member opposite that it isn't acceptable that those annual reports would languish so we will continue to work to further increase the timeliness of those reports. As I said, there are more of those annual reports being received in a timely way 22 years ago, Mr. Speaker, but there is more to be done. Thank you. Premier, while I agree that some changes obviously are necessary, at this point in time these reporting requirements are not being met. Each agency has an obligation to lay upon the table its annual report as a symbolic gesture of nature's right to know and the people's access to the public record. However, you have interfered with this access in the February 2015 directive. Here you have removed the obligation of these agencies to provide annual reports in a timely way. Without a deadline, our right to know is being eroded. What are you hiding, Premier? President Trez report. Thank you very much. Certainly we are committed to working with, ministers are committed to working with their agencies to deliver reports in a timely manner. But one of the things Speaker that I'm really pleased about that we introduced in 2010 was a systematic review of all of our agencies because we know that agencies are originally set up they may have one focus and we actually are going through our agencies in a systematic manner making sure the mandate is still a relevant mandate because in some cases it's not and are they effective at the mandate? Do they need to improve their practices? And looking at the effectiveness and the efficiency of every agency I'm very pleased with that cyclical work making sure all agencies work. Thank you. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Education months of hard work preparing for the test and an entire school day was lost with the cancellation of the EQAO literacy test yet another IT blunder at the hands of this liberal government failed pilot testing in 2015 and limited access to computers shows that this liberal government fast-tracked rolling out a program that they knew simply was not ready it was our young people who paid the price yet again. Speaker, be it eHealth, SAMS or EQAO why is this liberal government continuing to fail on delivering the fundamentals the basics? Thank you. Thank you, Speaker. I'm very pleased to receive this question from the member opposite because first of all I want to say to the students, the teachers and the entire education community that prepared for the test last Thursday how very disappointing it was that they were unable to complete the test and I understand that frustration and I know that EQAO has apologized to the schools and I know that EQAO continues to get to the root on Thursday but Mr. Speaker they have just posted an update this morning and EQAO released a statement regarding their investigation so far and it confirms that the cause was a technical issue and it was intentional it was malicious and it was a sustained cyber attack on their system. EQAO continues to investigate the matter and they will look into how to prevent a similar incident occurring in the future and I support them in their efforts and we'll continue to monitor the situation. Thank you, Speaker. Back to the Minister of Education before they rolled out the online EQAO test or OSSLT testing they should have made sure there was security in place to stop a cyber attack. When half of our students are unsuccessful at provincial math tests and thousands are unable to even take their literacy test education has reached a tipping point. Students at the Rainbow District School Board have started a petition because they didn't know the online test was a trial and their tests wouldn't be marked. With the right tools education workers can do their job effectively. Parents can be at ease and students can thrive. We can have the quality education we expect and deserve. When will this liberal government that rushing online testing cutting in classroom support and underfunding programs like special education is failing our students? Mr. Speaker let me just say that EQAO has gone through an extensive process in preparing for this test and they were ready. The DDSO attacks that occurred was not limited to the EQAO server Twitter where system went down from similar types of attacks. We are in process of looking into the root cause of this issue and developing processes to ensure that this doesn't happen again. The EQAO is doing an internal audit. They've also brought in external support to do the audit. Mr. Speaker we are moving to online testing because we know that this is a better way to support our students so that they can take the test and that would prefer. We want all of our students in Ontario to succeed and to excel and we will continue to support them and also to support EQAO as it resolves this issue for us moving forward. Thank you Mr. Speaker my question is to the Minister of Agricultural Food and Rural Affairs Mr. Speaker just this month we celebrated Ontario Agricultural Week from October 3rd tonight with the contributions that the 52,000 hardworking farmers do in producing food with their families from Ontario. They are the key to almost 36 billion dollars in GDP and they employ upwards of 790,000 Ontarians in the agricultural food sector. Now just this week Speaker we are now welcoming representatives from the agricultural sectors from Mexico from United States and across Canada to the 25th Tri-National Agricultural Accord. I had the opportunity to go down to Mexico last year to the Tri-National Conference in Guadalajara as the lead Canadian political delegate representing them. So this is our opportunity to host the event and I would like the Minister if he could to expand on the role that our government is playing at the 25th Tri-National Accord. Minister of Agricultural Food and Rural Affairs Well thanks very much Mr. Speaker I want to thank the hardworking member for Beaches East York for his wonderful question and indeed because of a because of a family situation he did an admirable job of representing me in Guadalajara at the Tri-National Conference last year but we're looking forward this week will be the 25th edition of the Tri-National Conference the first time that Ontario's had the opportunity to host this conference it will bring together the agricultural leaders of Canada United States Mexico. Mr. Speaker I can tell you that this conference will be building bridges not walls to both our good friends at both the United States of Mexico and we work forward to enhancing our relationship under NAFTA to make sure that more Ontario products go to the United States of Mexico. Thank you the Associate Minister of Education at a point of work. I would like to correct my record as I sent in my answer earlier we provide funding to the City of Toronto who then funds a number of local childcare programs including Yes I Can nursery school at $350,000 Mr. Speaker not $300,000 Thank you there are no deferred votes this House stands recess until 1pm this afternoon