Thank you so much to the organizers and anyone in particular for this invitation. I'm very happy to give this course, even though unfortunately through video conferencing because of the coronavirus emergency. So today I would like to start my course, which is going to be an introduction to the theory of grotendic toposis from a metamathematical point of view. So what do I mean by that? I mean that I would like to present to you the basic notions of grotendic toposphere with the specific aim of giving you an idea of the sense in which grotendic toposis can play the role of concepts capable of shedding light on a greater variety of different mathematical subjects. So I will present things in such a way that it will become clear why toposphere can be regarded as a sort of unifying metamathematical theory which can be used in a greater variety of different ways for studying mathematical theories, mathematical problems, for connecting them with each other, for multiplying the points of view on a given subject, etc. So I have decided to start my course with this striking citation by grotendic about the unifying nature of toposis. Grotendic says it is the topospeem, which is this bed or deep river where come to be married geometry and algebra, topology and arithmetic, mathematical logic and category theory, the word of the continuous and that of this continuous or discrete structures. And then it has, it is what I had conceived of most broad to perceive with the finest by the same language, rich of geometric resonances in essence which is common to situations most distant from each other coming from one region or another of the vast universe of mathematical things. It is of course a very beautiful extract which illustrates the way grotendic used to conceive toposis not just as mathematical objects that are interesting to study for their own sake but as mathematical objects which can play a metamathematical role in the sense of studying mathematics from a higher point of view. And so this is the point of view which I will try to illustrate in the course. So I will try to present you the basic elements of the theory of grotendictoposis starting from scratch.  We will introduce the notion of Schiff on a topological space. First then we shall go to the categorical generalization, the notion of Schiff on site. Then I will present the definition of a grotendictoposis as originally introduced by Grotendick in the early 60s. Then I will present you the classical points of view that have emerged throughout the last decades on the notion of topos. So in particular I will focus on three classical aspects of toposis which play a crucial role in the development of the subject. The point of view of toposis as generalized spaces. The logical point of view of toposis as mathematical universes and their own internal logic in which one can develop mathematics in a similar way as one is used to do in the classical set theoretical foundation. Then third point of view which is the point of view of classifying toposis. So toposis is viewed as the classifiers of the models of certain kinds of the first order theories which should be considered up to the so-called notion of Morita equivalence which is the relation which identifies two theories of how they have equivalent the classifying toposis. So these are quite the classical viewpoints of toposis that we shall first illustrate in the course. And then the final aim is to give an introduction to a more recent perspective which has emerged in the past 10 years I would say which is the perspective of toposis as unified bridges for connecting different mathematical contexts with each other and transferring notions, ideas, results across different theories. So going to the history of the subject which is directly related to this three classical points of view that I have mentioned the toposes were originally introduced by Glotendick in his quest for a general setting for developing homology theory. So in fact that was a problem raised by the Bayes conjectures the problem was to define a new homology theory that couldn't be a classical homology theory of topological spaces in the sense which was already known. And so it became clear that it was necessary to enlarge the realm of general topology and so to enlarge the notion of topological space in order to define more general homology theories. So this was the original motivation that pushed Glotendick to introduce his notion of toposis as a setting for developing homology. And in fact this program was successful because in the end all the Bayes conjectures were proved in particular thanks to these new Bayes homologies which were introduced. So the original conception that led Glotendick to introduce his toposes was that of a notion of generalized space so the idea of understanding a space through the category of sheets of sets on it and defining more general notions of sheets so that the notion of sight was introduced with that purpose to clarify the general categorical context in which it makes sense to define sheets and then a topos as we shall see was defined as any category which is equivalent to the category of sheets on it. So through this duality between the language of topology and that of category theory which is given by the construction of sheets on a topological space one is able to revisit general topology through the lenses of category theory and this as we shall see is very interesting because it leads to a great re-foundation of topology itself. So this was the original point of view so toposes as objects which provide the notion of generalized space. Then I mentioned in the previous slide that there is a second point of view of more logical nature on toposes which emerged actually in the same decade in which toposes were introduced. Category theories such as Villo Vier and Miles Tierni decided to undertake an axiomatic study of grotendic toposes which led them to the identification of a crucial object the object omega inside the topos also called its sub-object classifier which in fact encodes a great part of the internal logic of the topos as regarded as a sort of mathematical universe in which you can develop mathematics. So this point of view was exploited in particular to understand set theory in a more flexible way for instance one of the first applications was to reinterpret the forcing construction in terms of toposes and of course this perspective made it clear that it is important to develop mathematics not just in the classical set theoretic foundation but in arbitrary toposes and so from the very beginning there was this idea of categorical semantics of interpreting theories in arbitrary toposes and also studying their models in all these toposes aiming also for a classification of these models and this brings us to the third perspective on the notion of topos which is the perspective of classifying toposes which emerged in the 70s thanks to the work of many people but most importantly the Montreal School of Categorical Logic which was active in the 70s, so Makayre, Yes, Juallet So this point of view is that of toposes as the classifiers of certain kind of structures which can be formalized within a certain logic we shall see that this logic is precisely what is now known under the name of geometric logic So in fact this point of view of classifying toposes was already introduced by Grotendick in the specific context which he was addressing which was theories of rings and so special kinds of rings like local rings, strictly in c and rings etc but in fact it was already clear to Grotendick that this idea of understanding a toposes from the point of view of the morphisms to it from arbitrary toposes so this is the unique paradigm of course was potentially quite interesting because one could describe these morphisms in quite elementary terms in fact by using first order logic and in fact this task of identifying the right logical framework to formalize all of this was, as I said, identified by the categorical logicians of the Montreal School So this introduced actually a noble point of view on toposes because you see since you need any object in a category is determined up to isomorphism by the collection of its generalized elements we can present toposes by specifying the structures which they classify and then of course if we want to take this point of view we have to investigate the relationship which might exist between theories which might be classified by the same toposes so this relation is called mojite equivalence we shall define all of this formally in the course of the lectures and so of course we have to understand toposes as mojite equivalent classes of theories written within geometric logic just because the different theories may have the same classification of the toposes what is quite important about this point of view is that it is complete in the sense that every dotted topos actually can be seen as the classifying topos of some theory of course very interestingly this theory is not unique in fact this notion of mojite equivalence as we shall explain in the course is far from being trivial it is actually quite interesting and deeper because it expresses precisely the idea of describing the same structures in different languages and so it can in particular relate the theories that are syntactically quite different from each other but which share the same semantics ok so then this perspective of toposes as unifying the bridges to a certain extent builds on all these classical approaches in actually exploiting the fundamental ambiguity which is present in topos theory which is given by the fact that a topos can be presented in many different ways actually infinitely many different ways so toposes are presentable categories so they by definition as we shall see and so they can be built from a great variety of different presentations and these presentations can in general belong to different areas of mathematics and so it makes sense to try to use toposes as bridges because connecting these different presentations with each other and hence for transferring knowledge across different areas of mathematics so actually the key idea behind this use of toposes as bridges is really this fundamental ambiguity that a given topos is associated in general with infinitely many different presentations technically speaking sides but not just sides because toposes can also be presented from other mathematical objects but still the idea is that we can build toposes from different areas of mathematics which might turn out to be equivalent or strictly related and then in such a situation one can consider invariance of these toposes and try to understand these invariance from the points of view provided by the different presentations and this actually is a quite effective technique which can lead to deep transfers of knowledge across the areas to which these presentations belong so in fact what I would like to illustrate in the course is how also this bridge technique works and the fact that it represents in a way a methodology for investigating the mathematical theories in a quite dynamical way in the sense that you try to understand theories by multiplying the points of view of them by relating them with other theories and so all of this becomes really a way not just for relating the necessarily different theories with each other but just to study a given theory in a given domain but in a dynamical spirit ok so now I have I would conclude my conceptual introduction and I would start the technical part of the course by recalling the basic notions that we will need for introducing formally the notion of glottic topos ok so let's first talk about ships on a topological space so before introducing ships we have to talk about pre-ships so what is a pre-ship on a topological space well it is a way of assigning to each open set of the space a set and to each inclusion of open sets a function between the corresponding sets going in the other direction so if you have an inclusion p into u there corresponds a function going from the set corresponding to u to the set corresponding to v and one of course requires these assignments to be factorial in the sense that we want the identity inclusion of an open set into itself to be sent to the identity map of course it's a very natural requirement and we also want this compatibility relation between the maps which correspond to the inclusions in case we have a chain of three open sets one included in the other like this w included in v we want the map corresponding to the inclusion of w into u to be the composite of the two intermediate maps so these maps which correspond to the inclusions of open sets are called restriction maps because one has in mind the classical example of a ship on a topological space which is the idea of taking continuous functions on open sets of the space with values in a fixed space such as r so this is a classical example of a free ship then we will see it's also a ship because when we have an inclusion of an open set v into an open set u of course here we have a canonical induced map which is just given by the restriction of our continuous function to the open set v and of course you see immediately that these properties which give the definition of a free ship are really satisfied so this is why the terminology restriction maps of course the notion is completely axiomatic so these maps shouldn't be general restrictions in fact even the sets of this form shouldn't necessarily look like sets of functions but this is an intuition that you can use in a number of situations ok so all of you are familiar with the basic language of category theories so you will have immediately realized that the free ship is just a fact defined on the opposite of the category of open sets of the space so of course if you have x topological space you can define a category which is denoted o of x those objects are the open sets of x and those arrows are precisely the inclusions between these open sets so between two given open sets regarded as objects of this category there is at most one arrow between them so there is one precisely when the first is included in the second so it is a very poor in terms of structure category but it is still a category and so one can consider functors defined on it and if you take the opposite of it the opposite you take because you want functors defined on it to be contravariant because here you see any inclusion is sent to a map going in the other direction well you realize that the funcals on o of x of two sets are precisely the pre-ships then of course we have also a natural notion of morphism between pre-ships which is just the notion of natural transformation between these functors so concretely you see the notion of morphism of pre-ships is what I have written here so we want for each open set view a map connecting the set F of U with the set G of U and we want this family of maps to be naturally in the sense that it should be compatible with respect to the restriction maps ok so now we can talk about sheeps so the notion of sheep is quite important because it relates in a very natural way the global and the local behaviour so in a sense the idea is to consider pre-ships whose behaviour on a given open set is determined in a natural way by the behaviour on a family of open subsets which cover the given open set and so we give this definition we say that a pre-ship on a topological space X is a sheep if for any open set U and any open covering of this open set so by open covering I just mean a family of open subsets such that the union of all is given to the given open set so in such a situation if we have two elements of F of U whose restriction to all the elements of the covering family are equal then the two elements should be equal so this is a condition which expresses the fact that elements of the pre-ships are determined by the restriction but then there is the other fundamental condition which represents a converse to that I mean is it possible to reconstruct or to uniquely determine a given element of F of U starting from an arbitrary family of elements of the F of Bi provided that this family satisfies a national condition of course you realise that you should have a compatibility condition in order for the existence of an element defined on the big open set which generates all the restrictions because you see if you have an element S whose restriction to all the Bi is given Si then we should have this compatibility relation on the intersections but in fact this is the only obstruction that we put in defining ships so we want that whenever we have a family of elements of the values of the pre-ship at the open sets in a covering family which are compatible in that sense we want there to be an element of the value of the pre-ship at the big open set which restricts to the elements of this family so in fact we understand the significance of this condition when we revisited the example of continuous maps because suppose that you can cover U by the family of open sets Bi and suppose you have for each Bi a function which is continuous we pay using R and suppose that these functions are compatible with each other in the sense that they agree on all pairs of intersections then you certainly can define the continuous function defined on the world U which will restrict the world this at Bi and so you understand that in fact we already know many ships we have already encountered many many ships in different fields of mathematics in fact you can not only consider the ships of continuous functions you can consider if you have a variety the ship of regular functions on this variety and if you work in differential geometry you have of course the ship of differentiable functions and differentiable manifolds and similarly you have the ship of all of the functions on a complex manifold I mean the idea is always the same that of gluing things that are compatible with each other in order to get a globally defined object from locally defined data okay then an observation we can make is that many ships in mathematics actually are not just the ships of sets but they are ships of of algebraic structures such as modules, wings, abelian groups already this we can resume so yes I was saying that many ships which arise in mathematics are actually ships of richer structures than mere sets so in particular we have ships of modules, ships of wings ships of abelian groups etc already you see the example we gave here you see we can these sets of functions defined on the open sets of our topological space this is the structure of a ring because you can add and multiply such functions etc so one might be tempted to consider just the ships of these richer structures but in fact Grotendig never wanted to do that even though of course he was interested in particular in ships of wings because all the ships that are existing in algebraic geometry in particular in the structure shift which is associated with a scheme is a ship of rings but in fact he understood that it was good to privilege just the pure notion of ship of sets and try to understand these more refined types of ships in terms of them in fact what we will see is that thanks to categorical semantics one can understand these ships of algebraic structures as models of the given algebraic theory inside the category of ships of sets and so in fact it is a good idea to consider as the primitive notion of ships of sets because then you can understand also more complicated kinds of ships in terms of ships of sets and on the other hand the category of ships of sets is good because this category has as we shall see all the present categorical properties that we are used to in the familiar context of sets in fact these categories inherit all these present properties such as the existence of all small limits all small coordinates etc while it wouldn't be like that if we consider categories of ships of a more complicated kind so in fact as we shall see Grottingdijk defined his toposies as general categories of ships of sets not just a methodological space more generally honest art but still the ships were considered that we were using as sets ok so what can we do in order to understand ships from a categorical viewpoint well a first observation that we can make is that in order to define a ship on topological space we actually didn't use the points of the space at all we had just reduced the open sets of the space and the inclusions between these open sets and so in categorical terms in order to define pre-ships we have just used this category because pre-ships were defined as funtals or opposite of this category towards the category of concerning ships the situation is is a little more subtle because of course if you want to express the ship condition you have to do it with reference to a notion of covering of an open set of the space by a family of open subsets so you need to have a notion of covering the family in your category in order to define a notion of ship on this category with respect to this covering family and as we shall see this notion of covering family is what is provided by the notion of growth and pictopology on a category so why does it make sense to understand topological spaces from the perspective of the category of ships on these spaces well because in fact many important topological properties of spaces can be naturally understood and formulated as invariant properties of the associated categories of ships of subsets on these spaces for instance you can immediately see these four properties which do not involve the consideration of points of the space think for instance about compactness or connectedness these are properties that you can formulate in terms of the category of open sets of the space and then you can expect them to be expressible in terms of the category of ships on these open sets I will tell you exactly how this is done later but for the moment I just wanted to remark that in fact these are the two basic remarks which led Grotendicker to introduce his categorical generalization of the notion of ship and then the notion of a topos as a category which is equivalent to the category of ships on a site which is just a category equipped with a natural notion of covering family before introducing the notion of site let's just remark how nice these categories are so for any topological space X the category of ships on X actually has all small limits why? because in fact this category sits inside the category of pre ships on the space and this category of pre ships is a category of fanters with various insets insets you have all limits and so by defining them point wise you can get limits in the fanter category and in fact when you take limits of diagrams which take values in ships you still get a ship just because if you think a little bit about it you realize that the ship condition can be expressed as a limit condition because the ship condition can be expressed as saying that a certain arrow should be the equalizer you see if you have such covering then here of course you have a canonical map and then here maps so you can understand the ship condition as the property that this canonical map is the equalizer of these two maps and so you see you can express the ship condition in terms of limits and since limits commute to be limits you understand that this category is closed in the category of pre ships under arbitrary small limits in particular it has all small limits concerning co-limits the situation is more interesting because they are not computed in the same way as in the category of pre ships in general but there is a fundamental construction which is that of the associated ship factor which is just defined as a left adjoined to the inclusion factor of ships into pre ships and which allow us to compute the co-limits because in fact since this factor is left adjoined to a certain factor it will preserve our co-limits and so we know how we can calculate them because we take given a diagram of ships we compute its co-limit point wise in the category of pre ships and then by applying to the result the associated ship factor we get a co-limit of the diagram in the category of ships and so thanks to this we understand that actually all the categorical properties that we appreciate in the classical category of ships are inherited by the categories of ships of sets on any topological space. Now I would like to explain how revolutionary is this idea of understanding topological spaces through the associated categories of ships by revisiting the classical notion of ponds because in fact one of the great innovations which was brought by Topos Fury is being able to treat the ponds in a richer way in particular define a notion of point which admits automorphisms. So you see in topology we have a notion of point which is quite poor because well the topological space by definition is a set of points with a collection of open sets but then the points by themselves don't have a richer structure. While thanks to toposes one can define points in a way which is much richer because points become functions between toposes satisfying certain natural properties as we should see. And in fact more precisely the way we get such funtals from points in the classical topological setting is provided by the construction of the skyscraper ship on one end and the construction of storks of ships at a given point on the other end. So these constructions actually define funtals which are joined to each other. So the stork funtals is actually left joined to the skyscraper funtals. And so what we see from this is that any point of the topological space actually induces an adjunction. An adjunction between the category of sets and the category of ships on the space. In particular of course when you have adjoined funtals it suffices to give one to uniquely determine the other up to four pieces. And so here the fundamental funtals is actually the stork funtals because this funtals not only preserves arbitrary limits since it has a right adjoined but it also preserves finite limits. And in fact these funtals which preserve finite limits and arbitrary limits are the fundamental funtals that we want to consider between growth and ectoposis. Because in fact they provided the right categorical generalization of the notion of continuous map between topological space. You see when you have a continuous map when you take the and you try to understand this from the point of view of the open sets you realize that the inverse image of this map which of course by continuing this sense open sets and open sets actually preserves finite intersections and arbitrary limits. So what is the categorical analog of finite insertion? Well it is finite limits. What is the categorical analog of arbitrary limits? And so you understand we shall define this later in the course the notion of geometric morphism which actually is a pair of adjoint funtals such that the left adjoint preserves finite limits. And so we shall see in particular that every and the point of topological space defines a geometric morphism from the topos of sets to the given topos of ships on the space and in fact geometric morphisms from the topos of sets to a given topos are what we call points, points of the topos. And so you understand how powerful is this factorial reinterpretation of topology. In fact Grotendig referred to that as a metamorphosis of the notion of space. So a metamorphosis in the language of category theory. So it is not strictly a generalization because in fact the different topological spaces may have equivalent categories of sheets even though if the space is satisfied good separation properties this is not the case. Technically speaking if the spaces are so bad then they can be recovered from the corresponding topos of sheets. So it is not strictly a generalization but almost because I mean all the spaces that you encounter for instance in functional analysis or algebraic geometry satisfy this sovereignty. But most interestingly it is a reinterpretation of the notion of topological space in the language of category theory. And finally for today I would like just to explain how we understand open sets from the point of view of sheets. In fact open sets of topological space correspond precisely to certain objects of the category of sheets on the space. These objects are precisely the sub-terminal objects. So what is a sub-terminal object? Well it is an object whose unique approach to the terminal object is a monomorphism. We have seen that we always have the terminal object in any category of sheets on space because if we take the three sheets which sends every open set to the singleton of course we realize that the sheet condition is satisfied. So this is the terminal object and if you try to understand what are the sub-objects of this terminal sheet you realize that in fact these are the sub-sheets. So the notion of sub-sheet is what I have written here and if you look at this notion in the particular case where f is the terminal sheet you understand that in fact all these sub-sheets are actually determined by open sets which can be attached to them in a way to get actually an isomorphism between the sub-objects of one and the open sets of the space. So this is quite interesting as well because in fact you see that open sets of the space sits inside the topos as objects as particular objects of the topos while the points correspond to suitable kind of factors relating the topos to the topos of sets. So in both ways I mean both these ways are extremely important and you also understand that they are quite quite different from each other because I mean speaking of an object of the topos means that you are in a sense objects are what the topos is made of so they had a certain substance while the factors are a way of relating the topos with another topos so they are a less fundamental notion if you take the point of view of the topos because they induce a certain deformation of what is in the topos along a certain morphism and so in fact this could already explain the fact that toposphere really should be seen as a generalization of pointless topology rather than general topology because the fundamental notion here becomes that of open set of a topological space and in a sense the notion of point is a secondary more derived notion so I still have four minutes so we can start talking about the notion of seed which will allow us to define sites and then ships on a site so first we define what a pre-seed is in a category it is simply a collection of arrows with a fixed co-domain and then we say that a pre-seed is a seed if this collection of arrows is closed under composition of the art of course any pre-seed generates a seed because I just had to take all the arrows in the pre-seed and I can consider an operation of pullback of seeds along arbitrary arrows which is defined by this formula so seeds are important because they allow us to define a notion of ship without having to refer to the intersections of open sets you see here apparently you might be led to think that you need your category to have finite limits at least in order to talk about the ships on this category for a certain topology because you might think that you need some replacement for these intersections which you have to consider for expressing the notion of a ship but in fact the notion of of a sieve allows you to get around this problem because in fact you can make this observation which is here in the remark giving if you have a three ship on a topological space X and a covering family in of a given open set of this space then you realize that giving a family of elements of the three ship which agree on the intersections is actually the same as giving a family of elements indexed by the open sets of the sieve generated by the three sieve in the covering family which satisfies this compatibility condition and so you understand that actually this idea of generating sieves from three sieves by taking all the arrows which factor through an arrow in the pre sieve can solve the technical problem of referring to the intersections because the idea is the intersection is of course a universal way of connecting the two open sets with each other but more generally you could consider all the things which lie above the two open sets without necessarily the need of the existence of a universal object with this property and so by using this remark actually one can define ships on in the general categorical setting so what gives the replacement for the notion of covering of an open set by a family of open sub set is as I already anticipated the notion of grotendic topology on a category so for today I stop here and tomorrow we shall start again from grotendic topologies


أردت أشياء من أشخاص who commented on that video one being Abu Khadija and the other one being Abdelillahi and when I listen to both of them I listen to it attentively but what I sense from both of them is ignorance and lack of comprehension of the religion of Allah SWT and now that might be a very general statement but insha'Allah تعالى I will bring the points to support that insha'Allah تعالى but what I also felt from the two of the brothers is that they were ascribed into مدهب السلف that which they are free from that which مدهب السلف is free from and that is really the motive that actually really made me want to show the listeners that the point that they brought forward by saying that the self never debated the people of innovation that it's كذب وفتراء it's a lie upon and other pointer insha'Allah تعالى I will deal with it in this video insha'Allah تعالى but I also the third thing that I also sense from the brothers is they were unfair in the way that they pointed out the debate or that they spoke about it mainly he drew the debate as though it was a place which I was because uniting with the people of innovation that I wanted to become friends with them and then after that he refuted what he had brought forward and that reminds me of the Arab saying are you going to sell to me bad dates and then are you also going to be unfair in the way you scale it you make up that I went there to unite with the innovators you make up that I want to become friends with the innovators and based on that you bring all those points out which is the self never used to sit with the innovators and they never befriended the innovators but the مقدمة is what we disagree upon and all of that didn't really make me want to respond to it again and call to the good and come on the good and turn away from the ignorant ones and the poet also said I became silent from the dimwitted one and so he thought based on that that I was unable to reply back if the dimwitted one talks don't reply back to him it is better your silent than to reply back to him also the other poet he said if every dog that howled and barked you threw a stone at it then that dog in which you keep throwing the stone at it will become it will make the stones valuable every dog who's howled and barked if you threw a stone at it the stone will turn into gold it will become valuable like the gold the poet he also said if I'm tested with the ignorant one who's directing attacks at me who finds the things that are the impossible he finds them to be right I respond by being silent hoping insha'Allah تعالى that my silence will be a reply to him as I said to you brothers and sisters that their points that they brought forward or whatever they said it really stems from ignorance and lack of understanding of the religion of الله سبحانه وتعالى and ignorant stands on four pillars and whenever these four pillars are present within a person then definitely حصل له الهلات that this person destruction has taken place on him and it's pillars are arrogance and arrogance prevents a person from submitting to the truth the second one is jealousy and envy it prevents the person from accepting the advice that's given to him وبدل الخير and the third one is the person gets angry it prevents the person from being just and the fourth one is and the fourth one is شه ودزايا it prevents the person from being patient and chest and also عبادة and those four that I mentioned which are the pillars of جهل for you to try to get rid of those four and to remove it from somebody it is harder than try to move in a mountain trying to move a mountain from its place is easier than to try to remove these four from a person who's been afflicted with it and these brothers their opposition to my actions or the way I spoke only came from this opposition of theirs has only come from their ignorance of what is مده و سلف what was the methodology of the pious predecessors and that which our messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم and his companions were upon امام وحمد said the opposition of the one who opposes only occurs because of because of his little understanding of that which has come from the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم بصحيحها و صقيمها and their little understanding of what is authentically transmitted from the messenger and that which is fabricated and weak that is ascribed to the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم my advice to those brothers is التفقه في الدين have understanding of this religion and the hadith of معاوية رضي الله تعالى عنهما which بخاري المسلم both narrated which the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم he said anyone Allah wants good for him he makes him understand the religion this hadith should be a and a good advice for you guys it should benefit you in the path where you guys are seeking knowledge and you're learning this hadith should be something you hold on to that if Allah wants good for you he makes you understand the religion شيخ الاسام ابنه تيمى commented on this hadith and he brought a فائدة out a benefit ابنه تيمى said to understand this religion it means to understand that which Allah commands to understand that which the messenger commands to understand that which to understand that which the messengers صلى الله عليه وسلم are prohibits so you can have a person can have an insight within their religion and then he said don't you see that which Allah has said سبحانه وتعالى صورة التوبة ayah 122 ليتفقه في الدين so they can comprehend their religion and that they can warn their people when they come back from the battle that group who stayed back who were studying when the مجاهدين come back they can teach them the religion they can warn them because they were the ones who were studying فقارنا الإندارة الله connected and he attached warning with understanding amazement is to see somebody who's warning who's telling the people stay away from something or who's saying this isn't right but he himself doesn't have the thick of the religion he doesn't understand that which الله has commanded and his messenger he also doesn't understand that which Allah and his messenger have prohibited فقارنا الإندارة بالفق for you to warn have something with you first فاقر شيء لا يعطي one who doesn't have something can't give one who doesn't have who doesn't have can't give so before you warn and you tell a person stay away from this or stay away from that have understanding of that particular aspect have good understanding of it a lot of the time brothers and sisters we we see people who are being blamed and they're being blamed of statements speeches and actions which this person has done but when we look into it very detailed and we analyze we come to realize that the person who's being criticized isn't wrong rather he's right but the one who's criticizing him he lacks understanding he lacks the comprehension that is needed and the poet he said how many people who blame others who criticize others in maybe their actions or even their speeches but the problem isn't this individual you're criticizing this person is fine there's nothing wrong with them but the problem is you you lack the basic understanding that is needed whether it is this person what they're saying what do they mean by it or if it's the حكم شرعي the jurist spirit ruling in this matter you lack it ابن القيام tells us that he said of Allah and His Messenger is what it is it is the foundation of every innovation وضلالة and every misguidance نشأت في الإسلامي that stemmed out that came out within islam the أصل the fundamental reason why innovation and misguidance occurred is because bad understanding this person doesn't have he doesn't have the ability to understand ور الله تبارك واتعالى إساين he lacks that which the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم إساين ابن القيام then goes on to saying بل راذا هو أصل كل خطى every shortcoming the reason goes back to bad understanding في الأصول whether that shortcoming is in the fundamental matters of the religion or whether it's in the matters which are not fundamental and the matter becomes even greater when bad intention is attributed to it so the person had سوء الفهم he couldn't understand and then with that he added onto it سوء القصد he has bad objectives he has bad intention our brothers who I can personally say that they have a نصيب a portion of that which إمام ابن القيام said سوء الفهم and سوء القصد and as I said both of them are going to become clear and it's all it's all going to be seen إن شاء الله تعالى when I point when I point to their statements إن شاء الله تعالى إخواني أنا خواتي my brothers and sisters ignorance it pushes the person to goulou it pushes the person to be extreme الغلو means مجاوزة الحد the person passes the limits that were set for them they exceed that limits and our religion is a وصط it's in the middle of all religions the christians they refuse to affirm نبي الله موسى and the jews they refuse to affirm نبي الله إيسا منه مريم the muslims they affirm both وكذلك جعلناكم أمة وصطة the same as or the way that إسلام is a religion that is وصط that is in the middle of all religions أهل السنة are in the middle of all the deviated sects شيخ وليسام تيمي said أهل السنة في الإسلام كأهل الإسلام في الملال أهل السنة are in the religion of islam أهل السنة are in islam the way that أهل الإسلام are towards the groups meaning the way that muslims are in the middle when it comes to all of those deviated religions who are all upon misguidance and كفر and إلحاد the same way أهل السنة is when it comes to these deviated sects whether you look at the خوارج whether you look at the مرجع whether you look at the مؤتزلة whether you look at the جهمية whether you look at the شاعرة whether you look at the قدرية وهل أمة جرى the list goes on and for a person to become extreme and go outside that boundary أهل السنة were within which is وصط to be in the middle a person he leaves that and he falls into being extreme with two reasons the first one is الجهل ignorance ignorance pushes the person towards to become extreme so the person becomes extreme in التكفير by labeling people كفر كافر كافر كافر and the second thing is التبديع مبتدية ignorance will push you to it وظلم oppression transgression ظلم will push you to what when your extreme extremism stands on those two ignorance and oppression and they both push you to what to do تكفير easily or to do تبديع easily ابن أبي شيب and narrated in his مصنف ذات عليبنا أبي طالب he said خير الناس the best of people are هذا النمط الأوسط those people were in the middle the one who's short can easily catch up with them and the one who's gone far and extreme can easily come back to them they're in the middle the one who hasn't reached and is short they are able to catch أهلوا صنة and the ones who've gone extreme are also able to come back and catch up with them go and meet them those are the best people he said عليبنا أبي طالب حسن البصري he said صنتكم والله اللذي لا إله إلا هو بين الغالي والجافي يو صنة أتمنى من الله أنه لا يوجد شيء يو ورشب أكسدهم هو بين ماذا هو بين أكسدريم يجيب من خارجه أو يجيب من خارجه هذا هو صنة حسن البصري رحمه الله صدت الإمام الأوزاعي إمام أهل الشام يسن ما أمر الله تعالى الله has an ordered بأمر أي ماته إلا ولي الشيطان فيه نزغتان الله تبارك وتعالى he has not ordered اي ماته whether it may be تبديع تكفير or taking a person into islam or taking them out of it all of these are أحكام شرعية they are islamic terms if it's placed in the right place it is that which الله has commanded if a person who doesn't deserve it is being given it is also something that الله تبارك وتعالى isn't pleased with ما أمر الله تعالى الله has an ordered بأمر أي ماته except الشيطان he paves one of two paths from it whenever الله commands أي ماته الشيطان comes and he makes one of two paths from it the first one is امه إلى تفريط وتقصير إذا he pushes it to the person becoming short in the matter and not to fulfill as he should do وإمه أو إلى مجاوزة وغلوب that the person exceeds the limits and he goes beyond ولا يبالي شيطان doesn't care بأيه معظفر شيطان doesn't care which of those two he throws you into he doesn't care so brothers and sisters when a person is ignorant of the religion of الله and oppression is in him and that is something that is created in the children of Adam all of them الله تبارك وتعالى he said إنه كان ظلوما جهولا أي الإنسان the human being أين two things are present in him ظلوم and he's جهول he's oppressive and he's also ignorant the person who studies the religion who understands not which الله تبارك وتعالى commands and not which Allah prohibits and not which the messenger commands and not which the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم prohibited they would remove those two from themselves as time goes on and the more they study the more the ignorance becomes less and the more their knowledge grows and the less that their oppression becomes and the more they become just and based on those two which is ignorance and oppression إبنو تايمة mentions to us that it causes people to transgress on one another or to wrong each other إبنو تايمة he said قد يبغي قد يبغي بعض المستنة إما على بعضهم وإما على نوع من المبتدعة بزيادة على ما أمر الله به وهو الإصراف المذكور في قولهم ربنا غفلنا ذنوبنا وإصرافنا في أمرنا إبنو تايمة he said some of the people of the sunnah may transgress قد يبغي بعض المستنة some of the people of the sunnah may transgress إما على بعضهم either on themselves وإما على نوع من المبتدعة or even they may go extreme on some of the innovators بزيادة by going overboard على ما أمر الله به in that which Allah تعالى has commanded and that is وهو الإصراف المذكور and it is the israaf that was mentioned in the statement of Allah ربنا غفلنا or Allah forgive us for what ذنوبنا our shock coming وإصراف وإصرافنا us exceeding our limits في أمرنا in our affairs so this israaf إبنو تايمة he says it falls under transgressing even on the innovator and that is not permissible let alone a person of the sunnah who is from the what من خواص إهل السنة who is probably from the elite people of the sunnah to just open your tongue and to say he left the sunnah he is an innovator one has to be scared of that إبنو تايمة رحمة الله he told us how to cure those two problems which is الجهلو ignorance and a ظلم oppression إبنو تايمة said وقائمة السنة the leaders of the sunnah the imams of the sunnah والجماعة and the and the جماعة وأهل العلم والإيمان and the people of knowledge and the people of iman فيهم العدل sorry فيهم العلم in them is knowledge والعدل and they are just والرحمة and they are very merciful so you see the opposite to knowledge is ignorance and the opposite to عدل is جهل sorry is ظلم so the people of the sunnah the people of علم and iman they've overcome those two problems they have knowledge with them and they also are just and then إبنو تايمة والرحمة they're very merciful فيا علمون they know الحق الذي يكونون به موافقين للسنة سانمين من البداة they know that truth in which that truth will make them in accordance to the sunnah that would save them from the bid'a they know what truth it is they're aware where that truth is so it can protect them from falling into innovation and being in agreement towards the sunnah they know it they're very knowledgeable of it and also ويعدلون and they are just علامن خرج منها and they're also just on those who go outside the sunnah they are just ولو ظلمهم even if they oppress them كما قال تعالى as Allah said كونو بي قوامين those who stand لله stand for Allah تباركوا تعالى شهداء بالقصد witnesses of justice ولا يجري منكم شناءان قوم على اللى تعدلوا and do not let a hate an enmity you have for a people to what to not be just على اللى تعدلوا إعدلوا هو أقرب للتقوى واتقوا الله إن الله خمير بما تعملون don't let a hate you have for a people present you from being just be just it is closest to piety and have تقوى of Allah the verily Allah is خمير he's aware of every action which you do ابنوتي ميساد ويرحمون الخلق they are very merciful to the creation فيريدون لهم they want for them الخير they want good for them والهدى والعلم they want guidance and they want knowledge for everyone we want خير for everyone we want guidance for everyone we want knowledge for everyone لا يقصدون الشر لهم ابتداء أهل السنة do not want evil to afflict anybody that is not their objective that isn't their goal and that is not what they look for rather that is in a position to the methodology and the path of أهل السنة to want harm for your opponent and it's also in a position to the methodology of أهل السنة to be an oppressor and it also is in a position to the methodology of أهل السنة to make ignorance your base so you've got ignorance you are oppressive and you have no mercy أهل السنة ووات and I ask every student of knowledge that they take the statement of شيخ وليسلامي بن تيميا and that you hold onto it in the course of your years of studying the religion and that you place it في نصب عينيك you place it right in front of your eyes somewhere where you can always see which is to always nurture yourself with knowledge to always nurture yourself with being just and to always nurture yourself to be in one who's very merciful the knowledge which you have إبن تيميا says to you it has to be what a knowledge that allows you to know where the hack is the hack that will allow you to be in accordance to the sunnah prevent you from the innovation the second thing is what for you to be just to the person who goes against the sunnah to be fair not to say about him that which he didn't say not to go into his heart and start to say this is what he meant by it or this is why he did it and the third one is to be very merciful to the creation and to want for them good and to want guidance and knowledge to reach them and that you don't want الله تبارك والتعالى to give them except that


Live from Denver, Colorado, it's theCUBE.  Hey, good morning. Welcome to theCUBE's coverage of Commvault Go 19. I'm Lisa Martin, and I'm with Stu Miniman. Hey, Stu. Hey, Lisa, are you ready for day two? I was going to ask you, yes, are you ready? I believe the statement this morning was we're born ready for this. We are born ready. Yes, that was a big theme this morning. It's a theme of the event here at Commvault Go 19 in Colorado, and great parody this morning of all these old video clips of all these actors, including the Lego movie stars, from saying, I'm ready, even SpongeBob. That one got me. So we had a great day yesterday, Stu. Lots of news came out Monday and Tuesday, so lots of great stuff to talk about. We had a lot of their C-level execs, so a lot of new changes at Commvault yesterday really got the vibe of, hey, this is a new Commvault. Yeah, and it's interesting, Lisa, because one of the things we've been talking about is the 20 years of pedigree that the company has, as Sanjay Merchandani said. Yet, they're doing some new items. I was talking to some of the partners, and they're like, how come metallics, like a separate brand, don't you worry about brand spread? We know a thing about having too many brands on the program, so it is the history, the experience, the lessons learned, the war chest, as they said, of all of the things that have gone wrong over the years, and I sure know that from my time living on the vendor side is, there's no compression algorithm for all the experience you've had, and like, oh, we fixed something, and that stays in the code as opposed to something brand new might need to work through things over time, but metallic, a separate brand, but leveraging the partnerships and the go-to-market and the experience of Commvault overall. So, if you want, my quick take is metallic. Definitely, I think coming out of here is the thing we will be talking the most about. They're SAS plus model. I want to see how that plays in the marketplace. As I probed Rob when we interviewed him, customers, when you think about SAS, it should just be, I worry about my data and I get up and running, and they said, they have a very fast up and running, less than 15 minutes, that's great, but some of that optionality that they built in, oh, well, I can bring this along or I can add this and do this, it's always worried that, oh, wait, do I have to remember my thing and as it changes down the road, do I have everything set up right? Those are some of the things that we're trying to get away from when we go to a SAS or cloud model. And to your point, another theme of the show has been about operational simplification, not just what Commvault is doing internally to simplify their operations, but what they need to deliver to customers. Customers want simplicity, right? So we talk about that at every show, regardless of industry, but there is this line and maybe it's blurring, like we talked a lot about blurred lines yesterday of too much choice versus simplification, where's the line there? Yeah, and a great point, Lisa, so one of the items Sanjay Merchantani said yesterday in his keynote was that blurring line between primary and secondary storage, and I probed him on our interview. Is Commvault going into the primary storage market with Hedvig? Hedvig's got a nice offering, strong IP, good engineering team. I think they want to make sure that customers that have bought Hedvig or want to keep buying Hedvig will do it, but really, I think two years from now, when you look back at is that core IP, how does that get baked into the solution, that's why they bought it, that's where it's going to be there. I don't think we're going to be looking two years from now and saying, oh wow, Commvault there, going up against all the storage, Starwalt and competing a bit against HCI and everything, they have a strong partnership. So I think I got clarity on that for the most part, even though the messaging will move over time on that. It will move over time on that, that's a good point. The song Blurred Lines kept popping into my head yesterday as we were talking about that, but one of the things that was clear was when we spoke with Rob Kalustin about Metallic, we spoke with Avinash Gokshaman about Hedvig Sanjay as well as Don Foster, they're already working on the technical integration of the solutions and we even spoke with their VP of pricing. So from a customer, from a current Hedvig customer perspective, there is focus on that from Commvault's perspective. It's not just about integrating the technologies and obviously that has to be done really well, but it's also about giving customers the consistency and really for Commvault kind of a new era of transparency with respect to pricing. Yeah, and another thing we talked about some of that transformation of the channel and Mercer Rowe came on board only a couple of days officially on the job. He's helped a number of companies get ready for multi-cloud and absolutely we've seen that change in the channel over the last five to 10 years. Back in his days when he was at VMware, the channel was oh my gosh, when Amazon wins we all lose and today we understand it is much more nuanced there. The channel that is successful partners with the hyperscale cloud environments, they have practices built around it. The Office 365 and Microsoft practices are an area that Commvault and their partners should be able to do well with and that Metallic will tie into, as well as of course AWS, the 800 pound girl in the space will be there, Commvault plays into that. And setting the channel up for that next generation with SaaS, with the software and living in a broader multi-cloud environment is definitely something to watch. There's a lot of news about the channel not just from a leadership standpoint, but also so Metallic for the mid-market really delivered exclusively through the channel, but also the new initiative that they have. We talked a little bit about this yesterday about going after and really a big focus with global systems integrators on the largest global enterprises. And when we spoke with their GTM chief of staff yesterday along with Mercer, with Carmen, what they're doing, because I said, you know, channel partners, all the channel partners that they work with work with their competitors, so you have to really deliver differentiation and it can't just be about pricing or marketing messaging goes all the way into getting those feet on the street. And that's another area in which we heard yesterday Commvault making strategic improvements on more feet on the street, co-selling with partners, really pulling them deeper into enablement and trainings. And to them, that is one of the key differentiators that they are delivering to their partners. And Lisa, we've got to speak to a couple of customers. We have more coming on today.  They are excited about some of the new offerings, but as we've said many times, you know, Metallic, the new HeadVig, we want to talk to the new logos that they're going to get on board. That is something that for the partners has been an incentive. There were new incentives put in place to help capture those new logos because, as we know, revenue was actually down the last fiscal year a bit and Commvault feels that they have turned the corner. They're all ready to go. And one other note I'd like to make, the analogy I used last year, is we knew a CEO was new CEO, search was happening. A lot of things were in motion and it's almost as if you were getting the body ready for an organ transplant and you make sure that the antibodies aren't going to reject it. In conversation with Sanjay, he was very cognizant of that. His background is DevOps, and he was a CIO for IT, he was the CEO of Puppet, so he's going to make things move even faster and the pace of change over the last nine months is just the beginning of the change. And for the most part, I'm not hearing grumbling underneath. The customers seem fully on board. The employees are energized and definitely there was good energy last year, but a raise of the enthusiasm this year. Well, Stu, first of all, you have just been on fire the last two days comparing their CEO transition to getting a body ready for a transplant. It's probably one of the best things I've heard in a long time. That was awesome. But you're right, we've heard a lot of positivity. Cultural change is incredibly difficult. You talked a minute ago about, this is a 20 year old company and as we all have all experience and the industries in which we're in, one of the things that's important is messaging that experience and talking about the things that worked well, but also the things that didn't work well that they've learned from. That message was carried through during the keynote this morning. The three customers on stage that we saw before we had to come to the set. And my favorite was from Sonic Healthcare, Matthew McAvuse coming on and shortly with us. And I always appreciate, I think the voice of the customer is the best brand validation that you can get. However, what's even better is a customer talking about when the technologies that they're using fail because it does happen. How are they positioned with the support and the training and the education that Commvault is giving them to make those repairs quickly to ensure business continuity and ensure disaster recovery. I think that to me, that speaks volumes about the legacy, the 20 years of experience that Commvault has. No, Lisa, you're absolutely right. There's certain products out there that we talk about uptime in 100% in this space. I believe the stat was about 94% success rate. And we had NASA in the keynote yesterday talking about success versus partial success versus failures and Commvault really embraces that and has customers that will talk about that because there are times that things will happen and there are things that you need to be able to recover from with ransomware. Often it is not a question of if but when it is going to be happened. At least the other thing I want to get your comment on, Jimmy Chin, who is the director and one of the cameraman of the free solo Oscar winning free solo documentary, definitely gave me a little bit of, oh my gosh, look at some of the heights. And I was nervous just looking at some of the stuff they're doing. I like a little bit of lightweight hiking. I'm not a mountain climber or anything like that. But he talked about when the camera goes on, there's that added pressure and that goes on and it's sitting there. It's like, yeah, we sit here live all day doing that. There's that energy to perform. But we all appreciate that everybody watching and understanding that we're all human here. And every time, every once in a while, a word or a mistake gets in there, but we keep going. Free Solo Summit. Yeah, that's life, but also Jimmy Chin, phenomenal. I think in 2018 they just won the Oscar just earlier this year for free solo. I have to watch that this weekend. But a couple of things that he talked about is that failure is a huge part of preparation. Couldn't agree more. What a simplified statement for somebody that not only has skied Everest, the Climbed Meru, I think they call it the shark fin of India, but what you talked about with what he documented with Free Solo and all of the thousands of sequences that he talked about that Alex, I'm forgetting his last name, that the guy who free soloed El Capitan, all of these different failure scenarios that he pre-hurst over and over again, in case he encountered any of them, he would immediately be able to remedy that situation and get himself back on track. I thought that message, to me, failure is a good f-word. If you use it properly, NASA you mentioned yesterday and NASA was famous for coining. In the 60s, failure is not an option. And I always say on to that because I used to work for NASA, but it's a distinct possibility. And so what Jenny Chin shared this morning was electrifying, but it also was a great understatement of what Commvault is helping their customers. We have to help you prepare for this. We can't help you prepare for all of it. As you mentioned ransomware, it's not if, but when. Well, right, and both NASA and when the climbing is understanding where something could go wrong and therefore what the failure scenarios are.  And by failure, they mean, look, if the rocket isn't going to work or something goes wrong, we need to make sure we don't have loss of life. You know, that is something that if you look at Blue Origin and SpaceX, that is preeminent in there is we can't have another challenger disaster. We can't have some of these environments where we have the loss of human life. So that is number one. Some of the other ones, sometimes we know that the unknown happens or things don't go quite right. So, being prepared to understand if something goes wrong, how do we recover from that? And that brings us back to the whole data protection and recovery of the environment because the best laid architecture, eventually something will happen and therefore we need to make sure that that data, the lifeblood of the company, is able to be recovered and used and that the business can go forward even if some piece of infrastructure or some attack got through. And there's inherent risk in every industry, whether you're talking about healthcare data, we talked with AstraZeneca yesterday, you know, genetics, clinical data, or you're talking about a retailer, doesn't matter, there's inherent risk with every business. And one of the most important things that I got out of the NASA talk yesterday, Jimmy Chin's talk today, some of the customers is that preparation is, you can't be over-prepared. You really can't, in fact he said that, you can't be over-prepared in his line of work. So I think it applies to the inherent risk that any business has, managing data. As we talk about, it's you all the time, it's the lifeblood, it's the new oil, it is. It has to be available, accessible 24 by seven. If it is and can't be, businesses are at massive risk of in this day and age, competitive competitors who have maybe a better risk fault tolerance scenario in play, so that risk that they have to mitigate comes to preparation. We're going to be talking with Sandra Hamilton in just a few minutes about who leads customer success for Commvault, really want to dig into the training, the support, we've heard that articulated from customers on stage that I don't wake up in the middle of the night anymore because I have the support from my trusted vendor, Commvault, and that is critical to any business staying up. Yeah, absolutely, we're going to hear from a number of customers, I'm sure they're ready and we are ready for day two. We are ready Stu, let's have a great day, yeah? Thanks. So Stu and I will be right back with our first guest on day two of our coverage of Commvault Go. For Stu, I'm Lisa Martin, we'll be right back.


The next slide, I love this, because it really is spot-on, that part of becoming resilient is getting comfortable with the uncomfortable. One of the things that we know is life is always changing. We can't control it. And the more that we can surrender to that, and the more we can just kind of go with the flow, the easier time we have. So there's somebody here doing a bendy bend, and I actually have a yoga teacher who says that yoga is actually designed to help you get more comfortable with being uncomfortable. And that's different than being in pain. We don't want to push ourselves to the point where we're in panic or pain, but we want to get in that place where we're challenging ourselves and stretching. So there are three bullet points here. Cognitive flexibility, uncertainty, tolerance, and adjustment, and change. So when we think about cognition, it's how adaptable is our thought process? Are we rigid, or are we more creative and open to new ideas? And I would think in the field of work you do, there's a lot of cognitive flexibility in science and in math. I would think that that's actually a high skill that you have. The uncertainty tolerance, it's really interesting. Humans thrive with the degree of stability and structure.  But in life things are always changing, so we have to get a little more comfortable with things being uncertain. And right now there's a lot of uncertainty. We have a national election, a presidential election, we have this pandemic. LA is still on pretty hard lockdown orders. There's a lot of uncertainty. Are kids going back to school or are they not going back to school? And then how well do we adjust and change? And what's really amazing about humans is that we're actually pretty adaptable. I don't know how you're feeling now with your current setup at work, but I would imagine that some of you have adjusted to the new routine or have at least found some good things about it. So getting comfortable with the uncomfortable, we've talked about this. Often you think about the comfort zone as something that's good. I feel safe and secure. But the comfort zone can also be boring and stagnant. When I think about comfort, I think about like favorite old coats or old jeans that you just love. And yet they're actually getting pretty old and in need of a new pair of jeans or in need of a new coat. And it can be uncomfortable to get that new garment because we're so used to the old one. So we always kind of hold on and then finally release. Hi, I'm Amy Golding, Director of Psychology for the Workplace Mental Health Institute. We hope you liked the video. If you did, make sure to give it a thumbs up. We have more and more videos being released each week. So when you subscribe, you'll get a notification letting you know when a new one's just been published. So make sure to hit that subscribe button and don't miss out on this vital information for yourself, your colleagues and your loved ones.


All right, we need you guys help. We are sitting here with the marketing department Greg's walking through your good bro. Come on Just say hi on your way by we want your feedback The guys are the guys are like getting as far away from cameras they can It's like everybody's like as far away as they can get so we need your help We're trying to cope with some different show names some different show name ideas I'm wanting to do something related to the telephone The telephone is a big part of our business we have we have I Would say that a large majority of agents struggle because they suck on the phones We're gonna come up with a new show possibly on Tuesdays 100 percent related to the phone So we want to talk through some show name ideas.  Am I right? All right, so what's some ideas guys? Let's uh Let's get some ideas rocking up on the board pulling up the string to look at the chat, too Okay, it was a good one, but it's yeah Did you guys like telecells tycoons when we did that you guys probably can't even see this That's that's actually yeah, that's good so telecells Telephone because it won't be related a hundred percent 100% related to Right so the phone is the show is gonna help with it's getting better at using the telephone not 100% Telecells related some telecells related some did some cold calling related just Phone in general to help agents with being better at using the phone Getting better at using the phone. So we want some show tycoons before Now we are thinking about like telep something telephone related We had telephone assassin which that podcast went over pretty well I call it a podcast. It was audio, but I threw it up on YouTube I didn't put it on iTunes or anything, but that did pretty well. I want to get some feedback from you guys real quick I want you guys to be a part of our little brainstorming set as we try to come up with some new Ideas for a phone related show so all right any other thoughts You May end up naming our show you may end up naming our show that has to do with the phone Hello, is it me you're asking for I like that Tony G. What's up, bro. I like it man. I love it. I love it. I love it. Is it me insurance phone 101 from Tate Yep, thank you for the feedback. I like the phone. Yeah. Yeah, I like Alright, we're back. We keep going in and out you guys are awesome for bearing with us through this amazingly awful internet experience What else? Insurance phone 101. Okay Pretty good giving good phone What's up, Tanner? I Like the creativity I think What else I appreciate you joining anybody um What's some other what's some other thoughts on that? We're naming a new show. It's gonna be related to the phone We've got insurance phone 101. We've got tele-sales tycoons, which was an old show I don't want to put tele-sales in it because it won't be a hundred percent related to sales. We got telephone tycoon phone Some related to the phone master callers There's Bailey Dylan, Duker and Matt as I try to point backwards Yeah Matt Can't see him Matt Duker that's easier Dylan and Bailey that's way easier. Alright, so what's some phone?  So I'm we're gonna fix that Tanner Tate Tony G anybody else that has a that has a name with search with a letter T that wants to join in and give us some feedback Yeah, yeah, well, okay at least vote. Okay vote on that vote on your favorite one that's on the board right now, which is on The board right now we have insurance phone 101 We have tele-sales tycoon We have telephone tycoon. We have Phone freaks. I don't know Master callers So phone All right. Okay, so we're thinking about phone Phenom, I don't know if you guys were be able to catch any of what I would just said the last 30 60 seconds We're having horrible internet Massive tornadoes in Missouri our whole office is gonna get blown away any minute. We're thinking about That may be fake. What are they called that fake news fake news? What do you guys think about? phone phenom It's that one right there that was by Dylan who Normally comes up with good ideas Most of the time most of the time, huh? Phone phenom what's your guys's thoughts on phone phenom for a new okay? The reason we're asking we're coming with a new show that's focused around the telephone We've got a freaking we've got a massive studio with 10 screens that we spent way tens of thousands of dollars on way more Believe it So we're thinking about coming out with a show Focused on helping you with the phone phone phenom. Is there anything better than phone phenom? What's your thoughts on phone phenom Bailey? What's your thoughts on phone phenom? Maybe so This is like the marketing looking around table Dylan Duker, yeah The X sports rider that's the now writes about insurance If you guys ever YouTube comments Duker is probably the one responding. So if you don't like your his response, it's his fault Matt if you see all the social media stuff or graphics Then it's on that dude Phone phenom All right, so Tony G. Just Chimed in and said if it's not tell us those of the show center around setting appointments and overcoming objections Yeah, so it'll center around everything related to the telephone texting calling voicemails inbound calls outbound calls sideways calls scripts dials cold-calling lead calls Objections from the phone appointment setting door knocking using the telephone. I don't know how to do that one, but Yeah, yeah Tell us L's like a lot. It's gonna it's gonna go over everything phone related agents need help on the phone true or false Tony G. Thank you, buddy. Anything else. So we're in the marketing room. We're talking about a new show Focus on helping you with the phone phone phenom is currently in the lead By far and it's not even close Any thoughts guys you like that anything better Phone phenom You guys like phone phenom phone phenom for a show name. That's all about the telephone phone phenom All right Phone phenom it is going once Going twice Yeah, I don't I'm not a very good action here going once Going twice going three times Phone phenom new show called phone phenom thoughts thoughts thoughts So phone phenom it is thanks for watching you guys have a amazing day Quit sucking on the phone. We're gonna come up with a new show to help you love it Thank You Bradley phone phenom it is a new show Quit sucking on the phone the title dude that would actually probably get some hits What what day and time? You guys want to watch it only the phony. What's up Simon? What's up tape? Yeah internet connection sucks, bro We're going through a Hi, I don't know Telephone Tuesdays I Like phone phone. Yeah phone phenom Tuesdays at five o'clock Make sure I don't have me. I gotta check my own. It's my own calendar quit. It's sucking on the phone is the Problem is that we can be taking a lot of different ways and comments Which we try to avoid SEO might get us in some recommended videos recommended videos. Yeah, we'll stop over I like phone phenom. I really do Matt always tries to stay off-camera too. I don't know what it is You're not on right now. Yeah, he's like he's like he's the marketing ghost To Tuesdays if hey, what do you guys think real quick? Why you're on here, too? Do you like shows at 2 o'clock in the afternoon central time? Which is noon west coast? one o'clock Mountain time Two central or three eastern or do you like five o'clock central two o'clock or five o'clock? We're thinking about a later show. I think people would watch better five o'clock would be But also make it sort of like all different I think so I think insurance agent training Does pretty well Okay phone phenom say hi to Steve phone phenom Tuesdays at You're good. You're still on camera though phone phenom Tuesdays at five o'clock Starting today Matt will have a graphic for our back screen true or false Let's get him if he was getting on camera saying that true or false you got a graphic for the show today true true true That's another show true or false Phone phenom Dude, please hey Bethany Can you order me a giant phone like like Vince had had on stage at 8% Like a big foam one or a big plastic one or something because you can find It was hilarious Because we're doing a new show thanks to whoever's been watching we're doing a new show phone phenom Tuesdays at five o'clock central you guys like that idea hate that idea Give me some thoughts real quick before we jump off. Do you love it or hate it? Love or hate? Too late oh Tate says it's too late. Where are you at Tate? 6 p.m. Eastern. Yeah, what are you doing at 6 o'clock at night? You're eating man.  I'm most likely to watch a video I don't want to do shows at this time yet, but I'm most Common watch videos between 8 and 9 o'clock at night me personally So if alive just happen a few hours ago I may pick it up Try it dude Tate if you hate it bro. Let us know we'll change it.  We don't want to do them all phone phenoms at 5 Tony G. That's got a good ring, bro If only five started with a pH, but either way it's still sounds good Phone phenoms at 5 for it All right phone phenoms at 5 anything else any other thoughts guys we good Thought we'd let you guys join in on the fun today. I always find time for your shows Cody. No matter what Tate I love it, bro. Thank you, buddy Yeah Good on Facebook, but I love you. I love the youtubers better. Don't tell anybody on Facebook, but But I like you guys better What's up uploading knowledge says hi? Hello? Um Tate said I don't hate it. I like that. Okay.  You watch a lot of our stuff, bro. We appreciate it And if there's anything else that we you guys don't I Don't know what that comment means if you guys see stuff that like you don't See that you don't see that you want us to address Let duker know message in comment in say dude dude duke make this happen Start calling the dude Duke All right phone phenoms at five. We're doing it. We're starting it today five o'clock tune in later We're gonna drop a new show. What do you guys want here on the first show? Let us know in comments below Hope this new show helps me get over the fear of calling people dude It totally will today. We're gonna start with stats So it's two crews job to come up with a lot of stats that are related to the phone And then we're gonna address those today and start out with some generalized phone stuff. So Cool Tate the fear is over bro foam phenoms at five. We'll see you guys a little bit Thanks for being a part of this back and figure out how to turn it off