equest to take over as the lead participant, alongside her current responsibilities as head researcher of SCP-7000. This motion, unlike the prior, was approved due to presumed non-threat of the anomaly. The following tests were conducted under such conditions. Test 77. Experiment. Senior researcher Asher Kelsen is isolated in a room with 7000 and is disconnected from baseline probabilistic reality. Within the room is a table chair and three lottery tickets. Footnote. Purchased by Dr. Kelsen using their own personal funds. The tickets were within SCP-7000's sphere of influence. Dr. Kelsen proceeds to scratch each off and compare them to their respective winning numbers. Results. All three tickets win their respective jackpots summing up to an approximate total of $777 million. As a result, the Ethics Committee conducted a brief investigation into the manner of SCP-7000 testing and ultimately determined that, despite the influence of SCP-7000, Dr. Kelsen had a right to the money, though was strictly discouraged from replication of similar testing. Additional notes. I have no use for the money. I want to get that off my chest first and foremost. I split it amongst various charities, put a lot into the foundation, and even sent some home to my folks, but I kept none of it. This was an example, a perfect one, of how powerful this anomaly is and how dangerous it is. I will continue testing until someone above me finally believes me. Senior researcher Asher Kelsen filed a proposal with the previous file attached in a 30 email correspondence with Site 37's director. Unlike previous messages, however, Dr. Kelsen went unanswered for four days. Documents of the exchange are below. Proposal three. Two, Site Director Valeriam Zerwick from Senior Researcher Asher Kelsen. Do not ignore urgent revision proposal. This anomaly is far beyond our initial comprehension, Zerwick, and your ignorance will not provide you bliss. You deny my first proposal. Fine, I get it. You deny my second. Frustrating. But I could gather more data. You even suspend me. Then deny my request to be informed on why such a decision was determined. A request which, according to all site procedures, must be granted upon request. But I held my tongue.  Consider this my third proposal.  SCB 7000 has been shown to affect reality relative to its influence as much as its own. The tickets I bought weren't within its influence, yet their numbers showed up, nonetheless. This is bigger than us, Zerwick. Bigger than the few bucks it would take to provide with what little tools I need to faithfully contain this anomaly. So I ask. No. Beg you to approve a full-scale revision of the Clover's containment procedures. It is a vital necessity. With regards, Dr. Chelsen. To Senior Researcher Asher Chelsen. From Site Director Velrium Zerwick. Subject we do not ignore urgent revision proposal. I told you to let this go, Asher. I had faith a break would provide you with a clear enough headspace to realize what a fool you've made yourself out to be. Clearly I was mistaken. SCB 7000 is safely contained within its box. Nothing will change that, no matter how much you worry your pretty little head over it.  Consider this your final warning. Remember who it was that raised you to position you sit so comfortably within, and remember it well.  If you're really that concerned about the damn Clover, Director Complaints to Watson, I won't acknowledge them any longer. Man, oh man. This Velrium's pissing me off, man. It's got that perfect tone of like douchebag.  Oh. I didn't like that either, yeah. So I thought, yeah. All right. This, I need to see the comeuppance here. That's how this story is going to pay off for me. Following her correspondence with the Director, Dr. Chelsen submitted multiple proposals to Assistant Director Sherwood Watson's email. All went unacknowledged. Despite such, Dr. Chelsen reportedly continued researching the effects of SCP-7000. Addendum 3, Incident 7001. Here we go. Date 772000 blank. Forward, Incident 7000-01 occurred approximately 27 minutes after the arrival of 051 to Site 37 for a meeting with its Site Director. The perpetrator, the perpetuator of this incident. Perpetuator should be perpetrator, I believe. Of this incident has been identified to be SCP-7000's head researcher, Asher Chelsen. The following is a concise summary of the incident. Time stamp, 0 minutes. Dr. Chelsen can be seen in an experimentation cell, presumably conducting a test related to SCP-7000. Time stamp, 3. 051 arrives at Site 37 alongside one member. Due to vital operations elsewhere, only one member could accompany the 05 rather than the traditional two. Of Mobile Task Force Alpha-1, codamed Red Right Hand is an escort. Time stamp, 4. Site 37's Director notifies all staff of Class 4 clearance of the 05's arrival as per standard procedure. 5. Chelsen acknowledges the notice and appears to grow increasingly troubled over the course of the following five or six minutes. Time stamp, 11. After confirming 051's identity, the Site Director leads the 05 to his personal office. 17. Despite appearing visibly conflicted, Chelsen continues to complete her experimentation with SCP-7000 and is seen noting the results. Time stamp, 23. The Site Director can be seen leading 051 throughout Site 37 as per the 05's own request. Time stamp, 25. Chelsen completes the notation of the results and appears to gather up equipment. A few minutes later, she is seen to be heading towards the Site's storage wing, presumably to return SCP-7000 to its containment locker. Time stamp, 31. An unexpected breach occurs regarding a non-hostile humanoid anomaly. Due to this, 051 sends their own Mobile Task Force Guard to aid in recontainment. The Director and 05 continue towards the storage wing due to the lack of danger affiliated with the breach. Time stamp, 33. Chelsen enters the storage wing and is seen moving towards SCP-7000's storage locker. Once they notice the Site Director and 051, however, they freeze in place. Time stamp, 34. When 051 is approximately one meter away from Chelsen, she suddenly arms herself with her personal sidearm, leveling the gun at the Overseer's head. The following dialogue is exchanged.  Put the gun down. Last, I'm not sure what you're trying to pull, but I'm not sure who you... I'm not sure what you're trying to pull, but I'm not sure you know who. Chelsen pulls the trigger, but the gun jams. She sighs invisible relief and drops the firearm. I was right. End log. Following the events of Incident 7000-01, Asher Chelsen was immediately detained, questioned, and put through psychological analysis. Testing due to the sudden irregular behavior. Such tests revealed that she was not only of a perfectly sane and unaltered state of mind, but that her actions were executed with the intent of 051 survival. The following is her own testimony given at the end of her evaluation. Denial? After denial? After denial? I couldn't take it anymore. All of the inaction. I've spoken with Velrium before. Hell, I considered him a friend. But he wouldn't do anything. Nothing serious at least. Just a quick deny and he went on with his day. So when I heard an 05 was in the building, I got the terrible idea to put a gun to their head. I wasn't going to act on it at first, I swear, but when we crossed paths, it was like the clover had brought him right to me. And as luck would have it, the gun jammed, just as I expected. Fuck, I probably wrote my own death sentence, but at least they'll be forced to pay the damn anomalies of mind. Signed, Senior Research, Asher Chelsen. Chelsen's reprimanding is pending. Site Director, Velrium Zerwik's correction, 05-1's discretion. Blackout. Access, SkipNet email, 1, new message. Suspension notice, 2, Site 37 Director, Velrium Zerwik from 05-1, Subject Suspension Notice. After tonight's incident. I've taken upon myself to look into the operations of Site 37. What I have found has left me rather disgusted at the scale of negligence perpetuated within. Particularly by yourself, Zerwik. SCP-7000's files display over a dozen proposals to update containment procedures, yet all were discarded and discredited without much thought. From what I can see in your own log data, a team of researchers weren't even dispersed to further review the SCP, which is, as you very well know, standard procedure. If you have a justification for this egregious ignorance, I do not wish to hear it. The amount of offences I could attribute to you from less than a day of reading is grounds for termination alone, purposeful ignorance, refusal to follow procedure, discounting of documentation, etc. Consider yourself lucky that you are receiving a direct message instead of a removal notice. Going forward, however, you will be placed on indefinite suspension until further notice. Do not fret. The site will be left in quite capable hands. A new director's hands, specifically. Dr. Chelsen will be taking your place as site director. This is inarguable. Did you see the look in her eyes as she leveled that gun at me? The burning flames of determinations within? It was not hatred that drove her to pull the trigger, but desperation. Asher is a remarkably intelligent woman, and after looking into her files alongside SCP-7000's, I am thoroughly convinced it was your own inaction that drove her to this extreme. I can only applaud her bravery and commitment to the foundation. It is clear where her loyalties lie, and where your own fall short. I will be in contact with Chelsen shortly. I want you to spend a lot of time thinking during your leave. In accordance to O5-1's declarations, Velryom Zerwick was placed on immediate suspended leave. Despite her promotion, Asher Chelsen was also placed on brief suspension period of two months per the request of multiple other overseers, despite O5-1 protests. As such, Dr. Chelsen is currently serving her suspension period of two months, following which she will assume the role of Site Director at Site 37. During this period, Sherwood Watson is to temporarily assume this role. Additionally, SCP-7000 was taken into overseer custody following this incident with the intent of further testing. O5-6 has assumed the role as primary researcher for said anomaly. Addendum 3 O5 Council Consensus Regarding SCP-7000 File Date July 9, 2020 Blank Forward Following the events of incident 7000-1, O5-1 called a non-emergency meeting of the Council to discuss further procedure regarding SCP-7000 itself. Due to other vital proceedings, however, multiple overseers were unable to attend. As the subject matter was not considered the utmost necessity, the meeting proceeded despite the absences of O5-3, O5-8, O5-10, and O5-12. O5-4 enters overseer hall and takes her seat, effectively being the last to arrive with the nine present members. As she sits, O5-1 activates somaturgical wards on the hall, rendering it a reality exclusion zone as its standard procedure. O5-9, O5-13, O5-11 How about this? How about I take odds you take evans? Perfect. Okay. All are present. A unanimous sound of confirmation is heard from the other eight. Perfect. You've all read the briefing, I'm sure. I read the briefing alright, someone tried to take your life one and you rewarded her for it? Did you read the full file? Seems like it was quite expectant that she should fail. She even drafted a hypothesis on it. And if she didn't, I feel as though, typo, the situation is being regarded far too lightly for an attempt on a council member's life. The way I see it, it's one's life, not ours. If he believes she's to be acquitted, then she is acquitted. There's no skin off my back. Regardless of our own beliefs regarding this Dr. Chelsen, we are not here to discuss such semantics. One? Thank you. I appreciate your concerns, but the matter at hand here is SCP-7000, not worries regarding myself. Six and I have taken upon ourselves to conduct our own research into the anomaly, and the results are interesting to say the least. Six, if you could. 056 produces multiple copies of the printed file and distributes it to everyone present. File is included below. Please take a moment to read through it, all of you. Testlog Summary SCP-7000 is an anomaly capable of modifying any and all probabilities to an extent which it would not be unwise to consider it a passive reality bender. What is a curious note, however, is the extent to which it seems related to the human psyche. For instance, in an attempt to replicate Dr. Chelsen's six-deck test, we substituted the human participant with an AI. The results were eye-opening, as no desk, no deck, shared a shuffle. Once the human component was reintroduced, however, the results returned to statistical impossibilities. Of extreme note, however, are its capabilities to protect said human component, though this seems to come at a cost. With the approval of the Ethics Committee, we connected several tests which should have harmed the participating personnel, yet in all instances excluding those which would cause minor injuries, why these are particularly excluded as unknown, a failure always occurred which negated the administration of such harm. Whether this is intentional, it's an intentional trait, that's a typo. Of the anomaly, or simply its passive effect on probability on a grander scale is unknown. What is known, however, is that situations in which its modification of probability saves lives results in the writing of exactly one cloverleaf. Let me say that again just because I didn't quite get it. What is known, however, is that situations in which its modification of probability saves lives results in the wilting of exactly one cloverleaf. This was true for both Incident 7000-1 and one of our own tests replicating the same scenario. As such, SCP-7000 may prove to be an invaluable tool, but a finite resource nonetheless. Over the course of approximately 5 minutes, all overseers read through the file. So what does this make SCP-7000 some sort of anomalously good omen? Or some kind of trick. Who's to say the anomaly won't suddenly decide to skew chance against us? The original files, which heavily outline SCP-7000's lack of consciousness. And if that's a trick too, we've seen smart anomalies before. Is it dangerous to trust, it is dangerous to trust one even for a moment. Remember the falling Dawn Incident? 056 visibly shutters, 055 and 0511 appear uncomfortable. We all remember that incident, but I think we should also be keen to acknowledge anomalies which have done us good. 058 is still kicking because of the damn pill, and 053 is more spectral than they are human. That doesn't change the fact that SCP-7000 might be dangerous. I'd argue your continued skepticism is just as dangerous.  Matter. Trivial? We're all reading the same document here, aren't we? It toys with probability like a toddler with a Lego, chaotically. How is this trivial? If you would stop shouting, I'm sure others would love to explain. This is a council meeting, try to control yourself. 059 glares at 057, but ultimately remains silent. Thank you. Now if anyone would like to refute, civil-like, mind you, silence permeates the room for a few moments, eventually 0511 speaks. I may be a bit biased, but I see very little detriment in utilizing SCP-7000 as a tool which may benefit the Foundation's functions. We already have anecdotal proof that it has prevented an overseer's death. I agree, that's quite undeniable. The fact, though all of Dr. Kelsen's 1s and 6s research there has not been one instance which suggests the effects of this anomaly are negative. They suggest quite the opposite, actually. With nearly 200 recorded tests, it seems statistically improbable a negative outcome would occur.  This anomaly takes probability and twists it into whatever the hell it wants. Probabilities don't exist when speaking of this anomaly. The tests prove that just as much as anything else. Will you not listen to reason? As much as I hate to agree with 9, they bring up valid concerns, though I do believe paranoia steers them more so than their mind. Thank you. Regardless, I think we should take into consideration his points as much so as our own. Back and forth, back and forth, very well. Perhaps you misunderstand our intentions for the anomaly. And what are your intentions exactly? I wish to install SCP-7000 into the Overseer Hall directly and not a shot in hell. 9, let's 9.  Do you 9? Really think 9? Then I'll just sink here and... Slams his fist in the table, but my table would shake too bad. 9, the room... Oh, sorry. 9! The room falls silent.  Calm down and remember your station. 9 appears visibly offended, but falls silent, lowering his head. Clearly this meeting is going nowhere. 1, mind moving on to the official proposal? Yes, of course. This is O5 Proposal 7000-1. I, head of the O5 Council, hereby propose SCP-7000 be installed with the Overseer Hall, with the express intent of utilization as a foundation failsafe. All in favor. Council vote summary. Yay! O5-1, O5-2, O5-5, O5-6, O5-7, O5-11, O5-13. Abstain! O5-3, O5-4, O5-8, O5-10, O5-12. Nay, O5-9. Status approved. So, I like it. I feel like it's a very common thread people go into, which is just a thing that is lucky or makes people lucky. It seems to be a common kind of through line for this contest, but at the same time it's a narrow topic, so I think that's to be expected that there would be a fair bit of just stuff that makes you lucky or stuff that is lucky. And with some of the stretching we've had to see for how exactly we've had to stretch to fit into luck with our stories. Yeah, yeah, exactly. So, I guess it's like, yeah, it's rough, but I like this. I liked the whole, you know, Kelsen and Zurwick, their interactions, Zurwick getting their comeuppance. It's pretty good. I really like this O5-Log. I like it like a more serious version of what Rad did in the luck jobs. Right, yeah. I was reminded of it, for sure. However... I mean, I'm still Team Beyblade, but whatever. You know what? That one just, it felt like a ship post, but you know, at the same time it was a good, it was well written. Wait, there's more? There's more? There's more. What do you mean there's more? Wait a second. What? Oh, there's, there's, at the very bottom, they did a secret... Oh, what? There's so much. What? There's so much more. Holy... Are you kidding me? No. Input, overseer, credentials. I'm so glad you said something to me. Jesus Christ. I would have, I would have missed that. Alright. Incident 7000-2. On November 5th, 20 Blank, Site-01 experienced a major scale attack of simultaneous groups of interest, most of which employed the use of multiple deadly anomalies and anomalous technology. This attack was heavily coordinated and explicitly occurred whilst all O5 council members were on site for an urgent meeting, and nearly resulted in the deaths of multiple overseers during the attack. Meanwhile, however, SCP-7000's containment cell suddenly reconnected to baseline probabilistic reality despite precautions against such. This effectively intro... Hmm. Uh, what? This effectively intro, however, during the attack of SCP-7000's containment cell, despite being thomatergically disconnected from baseline probabilistic reality, failed and reconnected to the baseline, the anomaly immediately taking a large-scale effect over the facility, and following SPM, simulated predictive modules, produced by O5-13, was credited with preventing the death of anywhere between three to seven members of the council, along with the capture of multiple hostile agents. Following this incident, Dr. Chelsen contacted O5-1 with a request to aid in investigation efforts. As she had already served three weeks of her suspension, alongside further testing emphasizing both her concerns and beliefs regarding SCP-7000, she was allowed to return to work and promptly assume position as Site-37's director. The following is an email correspondence between herself and O5-1 throughout the course of their investigation. I'm gonna peek back over here. Uh... Yes, it is quite good without it, but in that little bit that you can now remove because it was, uh, edited problems, I see. Alright. So, 2051 from Director Chelsen. Here we go. Investigation findings regarding SCP-7000. Hello, sir. Firstly, thank you for allowing me to return so soon. I appreciate everything you have done for me so far. Regarding Incident 7000-2, I conducted multiple interrogations of the three agents that had been captured and discovered multiple through lines. Firstly, despite wearing uniforms traced to the Global Occult Coalition, the Church of the Broken God, and the Bloodless Martyrs, all three willing identified themselves to the chaos insurgency. Failing at falling acquisition of personal information, we found these claims to be true. Following, maybe? I don't know. Their weapons, however, are a different matter. This was anonymously modified and reflected those we previously acquired from Prometheus, though they show further signs of modification. We've since traced such to MC&D's markets, however, the prices were supposedly resold for far surpassed traditional expenditures of the chaos insurgency. Perhaps you can provide some insight where they may have received the funding? I have attached relevant files. 2. Ashen from 051 regarding the investigation findings. No need for such formalities. One will do just fine. The council isn't quite as strict on professionalism as you might think, and you are welcome. Regarding the documents you provided, I had my personal team, my personal team or personality, look further into MC&D's involvement regarding the Prometheus weaponry, alongside divulgement of funds within the chaos insurgency itself. Curiously, our implanted double agents within the organization have no records of such spending, and rather describe a sense of confusion throughout the general ranks. Supposedly, no such attack on the foundation was to occur. My running theory is that of a splinter group. Perhaps those capture can provide more specified insight. Alright then, one, I may have a lead. I might have a lead. Two of the hostile agents were practically useless, effectively peon soldiers utilized for combat and not much else. The third, however, was the team's acting commander who, after some persuasion, was very willing to tell us everything he willing could. I suspect various ghios made certain information unspeakable. A lot of it was typical insurgency bull, but as I'm sure you and your associates have known all too well, but a couple pieces stuck out to me. The group is a splinter as you suspected, but they're even more than that. All of the personnel, though identifying with the CI, are all listed as deserters and have been considered irretrievably lost. They've been acting as some sort of rogue guns for hire, and their claim as this attack was a prime example. Someone outside the insurgency paid them to do this. I have since offered the commander a freedom agreement. Should they can somehow provide us? Should they somehow provide us with access to their insurgencies accounts? At this point, we're simply following the money trail. Following director Chelsen's second email and additional interrogation of the CI splinter group, she gained access to multiple documents via account access provided by the group's commander. Such documents include financial data, which provided no names but confirmed that the funder was a private investor. And location data, which Chelsen then presented to 05-1, with a prompt request to breach the location. Further denoted as hostile 7K. Reconnaissance provided by Mobile Task Force Lucid-13, codenamed All Eyes, quickly confirmed safety to breach, at which point temporary Mobile Task Force VEX-09, codenamed Trail Chasers, was quickly assembled, consisting of traditional Mobile Task Force agents alongside two combat practice Thaumaturges. On September 18th, 20 blank, VEX-09 would be deployed to hostile 7K, where they would breach without incident. So doing all hostile agents and securing the facility. Multiple files were obtained at said site and immediately provided to director Chelsen, who would later submit them to 05-1 alongside the following note. Turns out the investor is an old friend of mine. I had always found Site 37's so-called budget concerns a statistical anomaly of its own. Of course, it may have been a problem in the past. But now the foundation is thriving, and new sites are constructed with a large enough allowance that it could be built three times over without little financial damage. Seems these suspicions were correct. The lack of funds originated from a man-made sinkhole, all poured into a group hellbent on destroying us. I'm not surprised to find Velram Zerwick's signature on some of these documents, though I can't say I'm excited. Of all the agents secured at hostile 7K, not a single one had knowledge of his whereabouts. I can only suspect he ran when he could. It would certainly suit the self-serving slug. I can only hope he rots in those shadows, but that's wishful thinking. More than one of these documents blames me for his impromptu removal, and I fear he will not let me live that one down. Until then, however, we continue onward. Attaches my proposal to revise SCP-7000's containment procedures, along with built-in precautions to protect you overseers. With all the evidence we have, I have no doubt it will pass. Time to cite SCP-37 director, Asher Chelsen. Director Chelsen's proposal was set before the O5 Council by O5-1, alongside all relevant documentation regarding its testing, updated containment procedures, and mechanisms for utilization as an overwatch failsafe. The meeting lasted approximately 14 minutes, at which point it was put to a vote. The results are attached below. Unanimous approval. But what's the proposal? What's the infer? No! I want to know the updated proposal! Rude! Call him rude! Here's the question. Does that additional content feel like that's a better end than what we were assuming the end was before? Because I do think the position of the footnotes is kind of, it kind of throws, it threw me off. And I feel like people might not be able to, like, may not see that last collapsible. So here's the thing to me. There was a situation with the original Murphy law actually, 3043, where Hippo made the final Easter egg, the final Easter egg addendum, white text. So you didn't know where the link was unless you clicked it, and as a result, almost no one found it.  And so you have to deal with that as a cost of making that happen, and you have to measure why it is separate. And so in Hippo's, it was a post-credit sequence, it was meant to be kind of an Easter egg, it wasn't part of the core story, and so with all of that in mind that I just said, I am wondering if it feels like a sequel hook, it feels like we're going to keep dealing with Chelsen and Zerwick, it feels like there's more story here, there's tales to be written about it or something. Yeah, I feel the same way. It kind of feels like the author didn't necessarily know when to end it, because there's a lot of good stuff here, but it feels like it kind of just peters off a bit at the end. Yeah, maybe if there was a sequel, that would be different, but it's like that and the spag errors and stuff. Technically speaking, there are three endings here, because ending one is Chelsen getting promoted and Zerwick being let go.  Then there was the next ending of 051 wants to do fancy, fancy stuff, and we got the really good discussion, and at that point I was like, I wasn't expecting another ending, and also I really liked this one, and so it felt good there, this one being hidden I don't think it needs to be hidden, I think that is unnecessary to the experience, based on the content of it. I can take it or leave it, because it is fine, there's nothing wrong with it. I just think that the overseer meeting is a lot stronger, in fact, if you wanted to have this sequel hook here and tell more of, if you want to, first of all, if you're not going to tell the story of Zerwick and them chasing him down and all this extra stuff, I would say cut this entirely, it's not needed. If you do intend to tell more of that story or if you want people to chase that thread for you, maybe you inspire them to tell that kind of stuff, I would honestly put this before the overseer meeting. I agree, that's exactly what I was going to say. And thing one is we fired the guy, thing two is he came back and had a raid, he doesn't necessarily need to have 7000 protecting the overseers to not succeed, although I do see the worth of making it useful that it was there to save them, I do see that, that's a small price to pay for having this happen and inspire them to use 7000 in the defense instead. And then we get to end on the high notes. Absolutely. So that is my advice if I were going to give Crit on this article if you want to make rearrangements on it. But overall it's definitely a plus one in my book, even as it is. Yeah, I think it definitely plus one it, but yes, author make sure you fix those spag errors, that's all, regardless of what you decide to do at the end, because I do agree with Shurm here, but I'm sure that there's going to be people that feel all sorts of ways, like oh yeah, I want the, I don't want it, I want it, I don't, don't listen to what you want as the author, but I do agree. Thank you for taking the time to follow us along and fix all the spag errors on the way down. Yes, yes, that was good. What is the length of our next article? Because if it's a long one again, Yossi has a 20 minute one that we can finish on. The next one is not very long, if it's unfortunate events by Conwell, I believe. Let's see. Jacob Conwell, let's take a sneak peek. Kind of gives me about like maybe like 1200 words, vibes, maybe less. Yeah, this is short enough. This is not going to be in it. Let me see the update. Yeah, this is easy. So Yossi, we'll get you soon, buddy. We'll get you soon. Yeah, we will. We'll be doing this for the foreseeable future. SCP 7000, unfortunate events by Jacob Conwell. Item number SCP 7000. Object class safe is stricken from the document has been replaced by fall mail. Special containment procedures. All remaining 40 instances of SCP 7000 are currently stored within high security anomalous document containers within site 19. All personnel accessing any SCP 7000 instance must have completed level four tactile cognitive hazard training and be equipped with standard issue anti-tactile cognitive hazard equipment. Use and or testing of any SCP 7000 instance requires direct approval of both the site director and the ethics committee. Update of November 15, 2010. Due to the increased frequency of containment breaches inside site 19 since 2000 and the importance of SCP 7000 as a foundation asset, all remaining 40 instances of SCP 7000 are to be stored within high security anomalous document containers and temporarily held at facilities on a rolling basis. Upon Elon vital energy, Eve levels reaching five times the regional baseline, SCP 7000 is to be relocated immediately via secure transport. Description. SCP 7000 consists of a set of 46, 40 playing cards. The cards are printed on a typical card stock of the mid 19th century using an otherwise non anomalous combination of inks. No manufacturer label or mark is printed on any SCP 7000 instance. SCP 7000's effects occur when an individual makes direct skin contact with any instance of SCP 7000. Upon contact, causality and probability are altered to an unknown mechanism. Footnote. Detectable increases in regional Eve background levels have been noted to occur following SCP 7000's activation, causing the individual to experience increased negative life events. These events include but are not limited to occurrence of traumatic slash accidental injuries, onset of chronic slash terminal disease, significant personal monetary loss and other financial hardships, dissolution of stable social connections and relationship loss, occurrence of natural disasters in areas of residence or death. The magnitude of this effect is directly proportional to the duration of contact with SCP 7000 and the value of SCP 7000 instance contacted. Instances of SCP 7000, traditionally holding higher value in Western card games, i.e. aces, kings, queens, jacks, etc., have been noted to cause more severe effects. Footnote. Notable exception to this trend occurs when an individual simultaneously contacts the ace of spades, ace of clubs, eight of spades, eight of clubs, resulting in the most severe effects SCP 7000 has demonstrated to date, usually instantaneously. No difference has been in effect has been noted between SCP 7000's different suits. Additionally, SCP 7000's effects appear to be cumulative. Individuals exposed to SCP 7000 multiple times or multiple individuals exposed to SCP 7000 simultaneously have been observed to receive more severe effects. Testing has revealed that anomalies that similarly alter causality are capable of negating SCP 7000's effect. Anomalies and tested include SCP 181, SCP 1968, SCP 3460, SCP redacted, footnote currently uncontained in Havana, Cuba, believed to be the custody of Fidel Kaster's descendants. SCP redacted, footnote currently uncontained in Moscow, Russia. Reports indicate the object may have been neutralized following the collapse of the Soviet Union. SCP redacted, footnote currently believed to be in the custody of D.C. Al Fine, under Secretary General of the Global Occult Coalition. Likewise, testing has revealed that the effects of an SCP 7000 instance are transferred to any document in which at least 20 micrograms of an instance of SCP 7000 is embedded, with the effect terminating upon removal of the instance fragment. Proposals to create additional instances of SCP 7000 for testing purposes are currently improved on a case-by-case basis. Addendum 7000-A, Discovery. SCP 7000 was first brought to foundation containment in 1990 following a series of defections of pentagram operatives, footnote. Operating name for the United States Paranormal Warfare Command. Recovered documentation from pentagram records indicates SCP 7000 was originally discovered in Deadwood, South Dakota by ASCI agents in 1879. Footnote, American Secure Containment Initiative, a precursor organization to the modern SCP Foundation. In 1879, following the town's destruction, it is unknown to what extent the ASCI utilized SCP 7000 during the period that followed as such records were lost during the assimilation of multiple ASCI agents by the pentagram. SCP 7000 was utilized extensively by pentagram operatives throughout the Cold War, where it was deployed as a cognitohazard against U.S. targets, both domestically and abroad. The extent of the utilization resulted in the full consumption of six SCP 7000 instances during this time. Footnote, Aces of Hearts and Diamonds, King of Spades and Hearts, Queen of Hearts and Jack of Clubs, with only 46 7000 instances surviving upon Foundation acquisition. Attempts to determine which, if any, historical events are potentially due to the United States government's utilization of SCP 7000 are ongoing. Records suggest the highest utilization of SCP 7000 within the Soviet Union and allies that occurred between February 1960 and October 1962, as well as December 1980 throughout April 1986. Successful containment of several SCP 7000 fragments located throughout the former Soviet Union shortly after Foundation's acquisition of SCP 7000 lends credence to these reports. Pentagram records also suggest high domestic use upon political targets within the United States between March 1963 and November 1963, as well as June 1979 through May 1981, though these accounts remain unverified. Addendum 7000-B, Object Class Update. As of March 3rd, 2010, following successful utilization of SCP 7000 instances by MTF Gamma-13 Asimovs Lawbringers, Delta V, Front Runners and Iota-10 Dam Feds, Lambda-14 One Star Reviewers, Mu-3 Highest Bitters and Alpha-1 Red Right Hand within Field Operations, SCP 7000's Object Class has been updated to Thalmail. Field Utilization has included what has not been limited to inclusion of SCP 7000-Bartic particles within letters and other correspondence, embedding SCP 7000 particles into business cards offered to via front companies, embedding SCP 7000 instances into clothing tags of POIs, deployment of SCP 7000 particulate into GOI building filtration systems. Footnote, this method was noteworthy for use prior to the containment of SCP-1609 and Operation Falcon Punch. Operation Falcon Punch, are you kidding me? It's a link, I don't know what it is too, but I know 1609, that's the chair. Let's see, Operation Falcon Punch is links to a tale, The Blackbird and the Falcon. I'll have to read that one. Due to the increased MTF Operative Turnover since 1995, training in the tactical use of SCP 7000 is offered on an as needed basis. Addendum 7000-C, Incident SCP 7000-16. Level four access required. Credentials entered. On July 5th, 2016, 12 agents of MTF Alpha-1 defected to the Global Coalition. SCP 7000 as well as three other SCP objects were stolen and brought to the GOC custody and is currently unknown if SCP 7000 has been destroyed via standard GOC procedures. Protocols to shield critical SCP foundation personnel from possible cognitive hazard attacks from SCP 7000 are to remain in place indefinitely. Attempts to relocate SCP 7000 fragments released within Foundation facilities as part of former Intra Foundation operations launched by MTF Alpha-1 are currently underway. Proposals for containment and or neutralization of SCP 7000's lingering effects on SCP Foundation personnel are under review by the Foundation Ethics Committee. Very neat. Very neat. I like the use of this item that does a lucky thing. I like the implication that the Foundation is using it for subterfuge and the United States government as a whole. I've been getting into Penn and Teller's Fool Us recently. At least the clips you can see on YouTube. Right. And it is the stereotype of how often the magic trick is playing card related. Everything's playing cards in the magic world. Right. It just so often comes up and I'm shocked that I think this is the first batch of playing cards we've seen in the luck contest, which I thought would have been a little more. I'm sure there are more. There must be. But there's at least three or four die like dice-based lucky SCPs. I mean, there were regular playing card decks in the previous anomaly, so I guess that counts. Yeah. That's true. This is simple, straight to the point. We have this lucky object. We've found ways it was used for stuff. Right. We used it. It got done stolen. No crazy format and doesn't take a million years. Does not. All right, that's good enough. Yeah, that was pretty good. Yeah, I liked it. I liked it. Pretty simple and to the point, as you said. I like the, it kind of feels like cliche in a good way. Like that they're weaponized playing cards. Yeah, sleight of hand would have been a good title. I liked it. Yeah, because basically this is assassination playing cards. Yep, I like it. That's a job done. Yeah, absolutely. Good job, Conwell, Jacob Conwell. Indeed. All right, well, that's that. Let me hit the last super chat we have over here because we got a big one from ear and ears.  God bless and God speed. This ain't easy. Absolutely incredible. And don't worry, I'll match this donation to the GoFundMe. Everyone earned it. That's quite a, quite a, yeah, you did. Absolutely. I appreciate that. Very generous of you, my friend, very generous. Very much so. And that means over the course of our evening tonight for Samarian, that brings us up to 60 donors. We hit 60, right? Correct, yes. All right, there's a milestone. That's nice. Yeah, absolutely. Thank you all for your generosity in joining us for this adventure. Thank you all for your generosity and donations. I hope you're having fun. I had a lot of fun with the voice acting tonight. Yes, me too. We got some good voice acting pieces. Yeah, we did, for sure. Don't forget to visit the support links in our bio, everybody, in the description. Make sure you subscribe to Billathon Twitch. Go check out the album when it drops. When's that album dropping? It should be next week. It was gonna drop on the 31st, but then 7K came out and then it was like, oh, okay, everyone wants to work on their articles and stuff, so I'm gonna set a tentative date of the 10th, the August 10th. Sweetness, go check out the preview songs in the YouTube and the SoundCloud guys because it's good stuff from what I hear. Thank you, appreciate it. It's very, very... Be safe, be well, secure, contain, protect, and we will see you all in the next stream. Absolutely. Stream ending soon. All I wanna do is have some fun. I got a feeling I'm not the only one. All I wanna do is have some fun. Until the song comes up over Santa Monica Boulevard.


New research published in the journal Anesthesiology provides fresh insights into how volatile anesthetics affect the central nervous system. Although anesthesia has been practiced for nearly 175 years, the precise cellular mechanisms driving anesthetic responses have remained ambiguous. Recent reports suggest mitochondria have a key role in the process, but prior research has only studied this connection in neurons. Now, researchers argue that astrocytes are also important, particularly when it comes to emergence from anesthesia. To reach this conclusion, the team produced a novel knockout mouse lacking the mitochondrial complex 1 gene known as NDUFS4. In the model, gene knockout is induced only in astrocytes of adult animals. The other cell types comprising the central nervous system retain functional copies of the gene. The result is astrocyte-specific mitochondrial dysfunction. To look at the role of this dysfunction in the anesthetic response, the researchers measured anesthetic sensitivity in both knockout mice and their wild-type counterparts. The mice were exposed to either isofluorine or halophane, and two different anesthetic endpoints were measured. Loss of writing reflex and response to a tail clamp. These endpoints model different facets of the human anesthetic response. The response to tail clamp is mediated by the spinal cord with supra-spinal modification, whereas the loss of writing reflex is likely mediated by interactions between the brainstem and thalamocortical pathways. Interestingly, no differences were observed between mice for the induction concentrations of either anesthetic, but a lower-emergence concentration was required for mice with NDUFS4 deficient astrocytes for both anesthetics and both endpoints. These results suggest that an astrocyte-specific mechanism is necessary for regaining consciousness. One explanation is that inhibiting astrocyte mitochondria blocks key signaling events or metabolic pathways in these cells. This could make it tough for the cells to regain excitatory synaptic function, until anesthetic concentrations are lowered enough for mitochondria to become active again. Translating these findings to the clinical setting remains tricky. The researchers aren't sure exactly how NDUFS4 knockout impacts astrocytic function. It's also not clear whether loss of the gene affects other critical pathways in the brain, but the results do strongly support the critical role of astrocytes in restoring consciousness after anesthesia.


All right. Okay. So today what I'm going to go through is really just the very fundamental of blockchain. Like even though you see this Bitcoin here, but it's really about why does blockchain really exist? Because I feel like that's the fundamental key to when you think about a system, right? You're not thinking about like, this system is a very cool system. Oh, yeah. Like what problem are you exactly trying to solve? So that's the angle that I'm trying to go about today. So we're going to start with a bit of history of Bitcoin because Bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency. And then like we go into like, how did they try and attempt to solve the problem that they have? So I'm just going to show you this thing. Actually, if you're very interested in the whole cryptocurrency blockchain thing, I would suggest that reading this Bitcoin white paper. So they actually go through like the all the technical technicalities of what is it?  Yeah, I am. Oh, I'm only seeing your PowerPoint though. Is it? Yeah, I think you need to share your either the browser or the desktop. Okay, hang on. Sharing also it doesn't work like on the screen that I am at. You got to maybe share the desktop. Oh, hang on. Let me see. Okay. Yeah. So it's this. Yep. Can you see that? Yeah. So, okay. So this is actually the Bitcoin white paper. So it's mainly what I will be talking about. Like I will summarize it. But if you want more details, I like this is the first white paper that I read and I was quite mind blown about how they actually go about trying to solve the whole issue. But anyway, let's not go into that. We will talk about these. Okay, they both of the cryptocurrency, which is the Bitcoin, right? So we're going to bring you back to 2008. If you guys remember, that is the Lehman brother crisis, which was a very major global crisis that happens because of how they actually mismanaged certain financial products. So the gist of decentralization, right? I mean, if you think about it, like, they talk about Bitcoin, they talk about blockchain decentralization, like the core of it is actually really just decentralization. And then why do we need decentralization? We need to examine like, what exactly is it about centralization that might fail? So this is just a very simple diagram of what Lehman brother is doing. Like, if you recall, Lehman brother is actually the fourth bigger financial institution in the USA. So they will have actually really having some very dodgy financial products, right? So at that point in time, there was a property boom. So people want to borrow money, right? Like, want to buy house, they need to borrow money, right? So they will have a mortgage to Lehman brothers, right? Then Lehman brothers will give them the cash to purchase their property, right? And so when you have all this mortgage, all these papers sitting around, one way of them to earn money from it is obviously from the interest. But obviously, just doing it as a just earning it from interest alone is not sufficient because debt can be very good business as well. Right? So they will start to package all this mortgages, everything with probably they mix it up with some financial products, and then they will put it into major financial products and then break it down and then sell to the investor or they start to distribute that and then so that they can get more money in that sense. So other than earning interest, so they also earn, sorry, so they also earn from all this package invest investing products, right? So why this system might work will work, right? It's because your housing properties is assumed to increase in price. So let's say if you give a loan to say person A and person A try to default it, but because your property is rising, the bank will take hold of your take ownership of your home and then they will have an asset that is rising in price so that they can sell it as well or like they want to do something to it, I'm not sure, but in that sense, this is how they manage to hedge their risk. But then when the banks, but then there will always be a limited amount of good players who you can loan your money to, right? So when people start to demand more for all these financial products, this debt based financial products or however they have been packaging other financial products, then the bank need to think like, okay, because it's always the bottom line. So they will want to go and source for more people to lend the money to, right? Then once all these good actors actually exhaust out, you need to start to loan out your loan, our money to people who have a worse credit rating. So in that sense, you increase your risk, but you, because of the profit that you're looking at, sometimes big financial institution will be willing to take this risk. I mean, like you just seen in 2020 COVID year, I mean, not sure what you guys think about the fiscal policy, but that's another discussion. Anyway, so what happened is because of all these subprime loans, people start to default on their loans and then the bank layman brother is holding on to a lot of properties, but you don't have so many buyers, right? So it's a supply demanding when you have a lot of buyers, but you have limited sellers, the price of whatever the buyer want to get will increase because you have more buyer, but then if you have more seller than buyer, then the price of whatever thing you want to get will start to decrease, right? Because you want to quickly sell it off. So that triggers, that is how 2008 actually start to trigger the fall of the financial institution and then because they also have insurance and everything and it just start to become very messy. So six weeks after the layman brother collects, right, the Bitcoin White Paper, which I just showed you was actually published, so but still the bank institution, they play a part in order to manage trust, right? So so inherently we want to trust this centralized system in order to make transaction with people. So if you want to move away from a centralized system, you want to move to a decentralized system where you don't have, okay, let me just show you this. So this is a centralized system, which is the bank system, right? You have a single source of point where you need to trust, right? But when you move into a decentralized system where every single one hold data inside, you sort of, you can trust, you can inherently trust the system because if one mode try to, so in this sense, like node will be like CPU. If one node try to change the data, the other nodes will, because they hold the same data, they will be able to see that, okay, like this node try to change the data, right? So this is how blockchain decentralized system enable people to transact with each other. Okay, I'm just going to go to this website where it provides a very good visualization of the whole system. So basically what blockchain is, right? If you think about it, like blockchain is really just a chain of block. So within all this block, there will be data that is being stored inside. So just now when we talk about transactions, so this are actually just transactions that is being recorded in the block. So when you look at this, all these nodes, they will actually contain data somewhat similar to this, right? So everything has to be made public in order for decentralized system to work because you want the data, you want there to be a check and balance for that system, right? But then in a way, then you will start to think, right? Like, okay, so I need to make this system public, okay? But how do you actually ensure that whatever information is being transferred around is a secure data, is the correct data, right? That is where all the hashing comes in. Okay, so if we go to, so I'm just briefly touched on like hashing. So it's like basically just for every data that you have, you will produce a different hash and this is how you actually can check on like, check whether there's any changes in the data. So, okay, let me just go to this, right? So how blockchain works, right? If you look at this, this hash, right? This hash is actually linked to the next block with the same hash, then you will generate a new hash after that. So when we look at all the distributed data, so when you have a blockchain, when you have a different node, right? So it's really about all these different parties running nodes together with the same data. So if you look at it, so they all have the same data here. And if I were to try to change something, let's say if I make a transaction over here and I try to change something, I will have a different hash from everyone else, right? So it becomes quite obvious that something has been changed, right? So how it works for the hashing, right? So there will be miners who will be, who will have a mathematical puzzle for them to solve. So if you look at, there's this my button here, it's because whenever there's a transaction that is being sent out, the miner will need to start to migrate. And then you will see that there's a hash change. And then when that happens, then they will need to mine the next block to ensure that the data integrity is being preserved in that sense, right? So this happens when, let's say someone tried to change the data as we have seen here, right? So this person, let's say PLA is a back actor, and then they are trying to change the data over here. They will see that there's now, now there's two different chain happening, right? So what blockchain really does, right? It always gets the, the longest chain as the chain of truth. Okay, so let's say if you try to change this, and then you can see that the further you, the further down you try to change the earlier data that you try to change, the more blocks you will have to start to mine, and then that will take the time for you to create the longest chain. So theoretically, it really cannot be done unless you're the honest actor, because if everyone is the honest actor, the chain that is the honest will always be the longest. So even in the, let me see, where's that Bitcoin? Yeah, so in this Bitcoin white paper, if very mathematically inclined, they actually calculate the probability of people trying to change the data in previous blocks. So the earlier you are, the harder it becomes, it becomes, the harder it is to change the data in series. So in that sense, so in that sense, it's also like, if you try to cheat a system like that, because you, so most of the time you will try to change your transaction, right? Because currently, currently that is what I would say most of the blockchain technology is being employed in like recording transaction and things like that. So if you try to sabotage this system, there's a tendency, there's a chance that your, the cryptocurrency that you hold might drop in value because people trust the blockchain less, right? So people, there's a, so this system is sort of inbuilt in the sense that there's an inherent trust in it. And that is why it becomes, that's why when you, when people talk about blockchain, they should talk about like it being a trustless system because it is actually mathematically secure in that sense. It's not like you need to trust a centralized system, like say for example, like this, right? So in this case, you need to really trust the centralized system to be a good actor. But because of the whole system, how it's being built up, right? You just need to have trust in the system that all the crypto, all the cryptography, all the nodes, they are going exactly doing what they are trying to do. I mean, is there a way to actually hack the system? There is, if you can actually gain like 51% of the mining power. But then the thing is, if you have a huge decentralized system like Bitcoin, then it becomes very difficult for people to actually have that kind of computer system, a computing system to change the transaction in the whole blockchain. Yes, I think that time they were actually calculating how much energy that's actually being used by the whole computing system is. It's actually very, very high in, actually quite energy-intensive and it doesn't actually make financial justification for you to cheat the system, right? But then, again, like when you think about it, right? So decentralized system gets more secure when there are more people participating as a node. Then you need to think about it like, but why are all these people maintaining all these nodes, right? So that's the problem that blockchain will try to solve. The next problem that blockchain will try to solve, right?  And so in the blockchain system, right, if you actually hold a mine and then you are the first person to stop the mathematical puzzle of that block, you will actually get rewarded with cryptocurrency. So when you are a miner, so if you look at it, right, this system is quite beautifully designed in a way because if you want to break that system, you need to run a node, right? So if you were to run a node, you get rewarded if you are a good actor, more than if you are a bad actor most of the time, right? You can try to be a bad actor, but the repercussion of being a bad actor might be psychologically and financially higher than being a good actor. So it is in this case, in this system, they will try to make it such that like, so it has quite a bit of game theory behind this system where they actually try to think about like how do you actually make people, how do you actually incentivize people to follow this system? Like just because you have a blockchain system, you have a technological system that might be secure cryptographically, it doesn't mean that people might follow it, it doesn't mean that people might not gain it. So once you have like financial incentives to incentivize people to be an honest actor and chances are they might want to not break that system in a way up. So if you want to see like how transparent this whole thing is, there's actually this, so all blockchain like you have like Bitcoin, you have Ethereum, you have like some other blockchain, you can all see all the transaction that happens through an explorer. So if you're curious like you can just type Ethereum Explorer and then you will start to see like all this transaction that happens throughout the whole, I mean all the transaction history. Yeah, so actually this is my own wallet. So if you look at this right, this is the transaction of 009 BTC and that's happening on, there's a hash here 216F and it's happening on 2018. So if you look at this, yep, so 21811 and then it's a 0.09. I think if I just expand it, yep, so oh yeah, sorry, is this hash F780DD? So you can actually see the hash being recorded here. So everything is verifiable on a public blockchain. So everything you can actually see what is happening on a blockchain system. And like what kind of implication this is right? I mean for now, to be honest, I feel like it's still a bit speculative, but then if you think of the implication, I work in the oil and gas industry. So recently my boss, she actually said like that's what, that's an issue. I mean because of the Hing Leong, Hong Leong, I think Hing Leong issues, like banks, I think they are a bit more cautious in allowing credit, what is that called? Letter of credit, like giving letter of credit to the companies, right? It's because like they are afraid that this company will take their collaterals and go to another bank to get the same loan because right now there's no system that actually connects them, connects the different bank systems. So like trade finance might be like one issue where you can sort of share data but in a very secure manner and to check like what is what is being loaned out and that could be a good use case for blockchain where we're talking about like places where you really need to trust, you need to have certain trust but then you need like the kind of public trust where, yeah in that sense, okay I think I'm not putting it correctly, sorry, a bit cloudy now, my mind. So in a way, if you need a third party verification body and it costs a good amount of money for them to execute that, like blockchain might be a good use case, that's what I think. Okay I am done for now, so yeah if you guys have any questions, do ask me about that. Okay so financial general ledger application, you can actually check out N blockchain, I think they actually signed something with DBS and standard charter, I think standard chartered of, I'm not sure if India or US actually read it, they were trying out a POC, yeah but I think N blockchain, N blockchain DBS, yeah so yeah N group blockchain trade platform, yeah so there is actually, I think right now it felt like, I think it really, because I feel like trade finance, there's still a lot of friction so that is where, if you can sort of verify trust without trusting, you know like okay sorry I think I'm not putting it in the correct word, so if you can inherently trust that the data is correct, yeah. Hi Ving, excellent presentation, yeah and you was mentioning that all the blogs should be public, right, so then in that case how can we secure it, like does it mean that all my information, like anyone can see all those informations, like what exactly, like let's say I want to secure it, I don't want like, like if not, I don't want all the public to see those informations, so what kind of like security or things you know we can use to protect unauthorized people to view those information? Okay so actually right, blockchain although like Bitcoin is a public blockchain right, that's actually private blockchain and hybrid blockchain as well, but usually if the blockchain is meant to be public right, your transaction will be seen on the blockchain because that's how the system is being designed, but the thing about all this like wallet address right, so unless I tell you it's my wallet right, it's almost, I think it's almost impossible for people to actually link it to your account unless, I mean of course the caveat is the exchange actually holds your information, so they know, they sort of know who you are, but because of the whole KYC thing right, it's not, I'm not sure if there's a way to be totally anonymous in that sense, yeah wait do you know of anything like whether there's a anonymous like factor way off, because like I know like currently of course I think like government is always like trying to regulate and there's a lot of KYC being done, you can if you are interested in KYC which is a government regulation, you can check out travel rule, I'll type it in the chat, travel rule by FATF is pretty recent so now the US government they want to regulate anything that is higher than USD $250 in cryptocurrency transaction, so basically KYC has to be done by the sender and also the receiver in different details, so totally anonymous one, I don't think, by definition I don't think there is a totally anonymous, but on the side note on privacy coins right, a lot of people are trying to do, but then on one hand you know the dark side people are trying to do, on the other hand the government will sit down because it's not the interests of the government, yeah. I should falsely say they might do taxation on crypto, I'm not sure, they might just say. In Japan they are ready to win it, that's why a lot of Japanese people they want to move the money out.  Yeah you can actually do that, that's right you can actually do that, but then once you want to hit the exchange, I think once you want to move anything, then that will be an issue, unless you do a... Yeah if you want to get to your bank account, yeah, yeah, yeah, but you can, yeah, but definitely you can own a Bitcoin like that, good point, good point. Oh but also a quick mention, you can just create a lot of wallets actually, you can just create as many as you like, it's not like your bank can't have one bank account, you can make as many wallets as you like and spread your kind of wealth around. Yeah, yeah, I think that's actually what they do, like the wheels, they will like, if you track, you can see like they actually move things around quite a bit, yeah, there's actually API, like if you guys are interested in like how this actually flow, there's API, I think for, I think probably almost all the public blockchain, they will have their API because by right they are supposed to put their code on GitHub, because they want people to run their notes, so the code will always all be on GitHub and then they probably have API documents for you to see as well. I can take it if you don't want to take it, I think you're quite tired. I can take a more question on MAH because I'm talking to them. Oh, okay, yes please. Okay, we'll see if you look at MAH if I take your question. Okay, perfect. So MAH, in general, regulation and our emerging technology in general in Singapore, because I'm not in GTAC, so I can speak freely as I want. So the GTAC is around three to five years. So for a very, very concrete example, if you are currently using cryptocurrency and you're using Exchange or Wallet, so custodian wallets that are centralized like crypto.com, if you were to download, okay, crypto.com because Wing and I, we were talking two days ago about crypto.com because we had dinner together. So if you were to log in and download and log into crypto.com where you can buy, sell and exchange cryptocurrencies, right, you will see a sign, like a warning sign saying that okay, crypto.com, we are not regulated by MAHs, so please take note while you do your trading on crypto.com. So what MAH is doing is that currently because of the Payment Service Act, which is PSA, now Payment Service Act actually demands KYC from the sender and the receiver of the cryptocurrency to a certain degree. So as long as you are a custodian wallet or you have any form of Bitcoin or like cryptocurrency, right, you have to be licensed in Singapore. Currently MAH is giving all the crypto institutions a period of six months to one year to be licensed, starting from, if I'm not wrong, 201.9. So there is a list on it. So basically, let's say Binance, if you trade with Binance.sg, they are on the list, like they are either getting a license or they already got the license. So as long as you don't have the license, right, technically, you are not supposed to operate in Singapore, which is why probably crypto.com most, I think the tech side, they mostly out of Singapore. So their Singapore office is only marketing side. Basically, the tech side is like a third party and then they sort of like outsource it into some other countries that is like very crypto friendly in regulation. So the next question about how MAH is like pushing blockchain, right, through the recent Singapore FinTech festival, DBS actually set up their own cryptocurrency exchange, which is pretty big news because now it means that our DBS, they are actually storing and keeping their own cryptocurrency, which means that they can potentially be a crypto wheel and hence influence the movement and the prices, no not really prices, because they're so small there, maybe movements of cryptocurrency and because DBS is rather legal in a sense, and stakeholders are pretty much from, need to be careful here, let me think of how to do it. More legit people in Singapore, let's put it this way. So there is a form of control, more towards the centralised side. So wondering how the government is pushing this tech. I think you can, I mean, I don't know how to put it. The government is working on it, right? There's a few... I forget we've been, thanks for saving me. Even MPA is actually looking at it. I think there were, that time when I was doing a blockchain hackathon, I actually spoke to MPA, so they're actually trying to do up some, what is that, the one that you actually try to reconcile to blockchain, I can't remember that term. Interoperability. Yeah, correct. So they're actually looking at that. So there's a few projects that are ongoing on the government side, but I'm not sure if they actually go beyond the POC stage already or not. I haven't been, honestly haven't been following up, but I mean there's always like, if you go and Google, there's like project open, all those stuff as well. I think you can forget the government there, because I don't think that, okay, well I just forget it. Property hyperledger R3 corner. Yeah, I don't need you to care about MAS. Yeah, open sets, yeah. Cool, I think that's, if there's no other questions, then that's it. Thank you for wing and one way for the sharing. I'll stop the recording now.