Hey Psych2Goers, welcome back to our channel. There are quite a few psychology tricks out there. Some are often used by retail workers and some are even used by psychologists as an effective approach to treatment. What are these influential tricks? Well, here are five simple psychology tricks to influence others. Number one, ask for a large request, then a smaller one. So you really want to pet goldfish? Simple enough, right? But your parents won't allow you to get one. For a responsible, diligent human being, what's the big idea? Well, you might want to ask for a pet dog first. Say what? Yep, I know you don't want a dog, you want a goldfish. And you want to name it Goldie. Yes, genius name, right? Well, if you ask for a large request first, you may just get a yes when you ask for a smaller one after. In psychology, this technique is called the door-in-the-face technique and can be used in many situations. One simply requests a lot from you and then when you say no, they simply lower the amount drastically. So the newer offer doesn't sound as bad when compared. So when you ask for that pet dog, a goldfish doesn't seem that bad, huh? Number two, paraphrase others. Want others to know you understand their feelings? Paraphrase what they've told you and repeat it back to them. This is known as reflective listening. It's a great way to show you empathize with them and brings you closer. Just from a 2007 research study published in the American Journal of Psychotherapy furthered this theory. The studies have found that when therapists use reflective listening, their patients had a higher chance of disclosing more information on their emotions and their therapeutic relationship with their therapist improved.  Are you constantly feeling tired but just can't seem to fall asleep? Luckily, our sponsor for this video, Endel, can help you out. With the help of their unique soundscapes, Endel can easily create feelings of comfort and safety. Raise your productivity levels and calm your mind so you can get the deep sleep you deserve. But how do they do it? With the help of their AI core technology, Endel updates their soundscapes in real time by using personal inputs such as your location, current weather and even the time so that they can deliver the most suitable product possible. Want to hear the great news? The first 100 people to download Endel at the link below will receive a free week of audio experience. If you're interested, check out the description to take advantage of this exclusive offer. 3. Mirror Someone's Subtle Behaviors Mirroring is when you mimic another's gestures and expressions so they can relate and perceive you more like themselves. If you want someone on your good side, this method might work. You could mirror their subtle gestures or simply how they hold themselves. This mimicking of others can happen to yourself subconsciously too. This instance is called the chameleon effect and was explored in several studies. If someone thinks you're like them, they'll want to be your friend. So, someone could be mirroring you subconsciously or to gain your trust. Likely, they just want to be your friend though. 4. Nod Your Head According to a 1980s study published in the Applied Psychology Journal, psychologists found that when others nod while listening to someone, they're more likely to agree with them. So, remember the chameleon effect and all that mumbo jumbo about mirroring we just went through? Well, if your new friend keeps nodding at the story you were just telling, that in turn may make you subconsciously want to nod in response. And if you nod while trying to get them to agree to something, they might just find themselves nodding in agreement back. Still want that pet goldfish? Nod yes. 5. Ask for a favor when they're tired According to several studies, people are more likely to be influenced to do something they initially didn't want to do when tired. Think about it. After a long day of work, you're mentally exhausted as well as physically. Do you really want to be up in the wee hours of the night discussing a favor? You'd do anything to simply get to the rest. Even agree to a favor you'll do later. Just so you can go to sleep for now. Which is why this method works best. So do you think someone has ever used these tricks on you? Were you influenced? Let us know in the comments down below. Do you now want to pet goldfish? Well, it won't be hard to get now. If you enjoyed this video, don't forget to click the like button and share it with a friend. Subscribe to Psych2Go and hit the notification bell icon for more content like this. And thanks for watching.


Okay. I think I see most books. Okay, great. All right. Thank you, Bryn. Actually worked out well for all of us, I think. Okay, so. Good. Continue please. Okay. Oh, actually, okay, let me, if you can wait a minute, let me just let. Chair know that we are waiting on her. Sorry. No problem. I did want to just flag for the committee that I do need to leave pretty soon for the Senate floor. Okay. No, I, thanks. I understand that. Okay.  Okay. So, um, I know that we sort of ended abruptly there on the new crime. I wasn't sure if there were other questions about that before I moved on to the body cameras portion. Of the bill. Nope.  Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. So section six. Adds a requirement to title 20 that the department of public safety equipped all of the Vermont state police officers with body cameras or another recording device. And it requires that that device is recording whenever the officer has contact with the public for law enforcement purposes. The associated section is section seven. And it provides that DPS should immediately start acquiring these body cameras and using them. Um, and any ongoing costs that are associated with them. So storage costs. Um, any of storage costs that can't be accommodated in DPS's budget. Um, should be included in their FY 21 budget proposal. Um, that is coming in in August of this year. Um, Brenna, I have a question and then I see Tom and Martin. So back in section six when it talks about the department. Shall ensure that every department law enforcement officer. So again, we're just talking about DPS. We're in this bill. We're not talking about the municipalities or correct. That's correct. Great. Thank you. Um, Tom and then Martin. So what Maxine was just talking about department means DPS. Okay. Great. Well, this is. Yeah, I'm sorry. Go ahead. Vermont state police officers. This is a requirement. The Vermont state police be equipped with body cameras. Um, Beginning in August of 2020 of this year. Okay. Um, so, uh, Starting on line 16 on section six, that the device recording whenever the officer has contact with the public for law enforcement purposes is, is that pulled someplace else? Because I'm just going to go on memory because it was a, uh, a few years ago talking or first I'll ask, would that be. The cameras are on when they're say at a, at a precinct or a, uh, police station. Uh, when they're inside. Um, I think that it was intended to, to be pretty broad and encompassing any interaction that law enforcement has, um, with the civilian. So I think it could, it could conceivably be in the station. Yes. Right. Cause again, I'm going on memory from a few years ago talking with my son.  And I don't know the reason why. Uh, maybe there's plenty of cameras in the station that would cover or something like that. But, um, I guess that would go back. Uh, is there. I mean, this is, I'm good. I'm sure your answer is going to be, I have no idea. But it is our, uh, police stations are the state police barracks. Are they camera inside that, you know? Or, or I guess if, if you don't know, maybe not, or could answer it. And then I'm done. I have no idea. You were right about my answer. Okay. Um, Brina, I do see some hands up. Can you, can you. Yeah. Okay. Great. Um, so let's see, uh, Uh, Martin and then Jim, I think that's a nodder. Okay.  Actually a model policy that's been implemented. So can you point in, you don't have to do it right now, but can you point to where out, didn't you mention earlier that this is gov ops Senate gov ops is, is. Um, considering this, if you could point to the bill and the provision and if it's possible for you to send us what that policy is. I know this is mostly gov ops, but, but there are issues that overlap with, uh, judiciary, such as privacy concerns is something that we've really looked closely at. And there are definitely privacy issues with respect to the use of these, uh, cameras. Um, so if we could get that information. Um, and then, um, I think that's a good point. Um, I think that if this is, if this seems to be moving at the same time, then I'm fine with it, but, but putting a bunch of devices out there with actually without the policy seems to be a bad idea. Absolutely. I can send, I'll send the committee a link to, um, the LAB model policy. Um, and also I'll see if there's something that's been posted to Senate gov ops. I believe that this is in the works like. Uh, I think that's a good point. Um, I think that's a good point. On what, what the policy should be for the use of these body cameras. So I can get that all to the committee as soon as the Senate's off the floor today. Thanks. Yeah. And we, we can also think about, you know, the effective date and. If that. You know, helping if moving the effective date might. Reliviate some concerns. Uh, okay. Let's see. So Jim, not our Barbara. And again, Bryn, let us know when you. When you need to go. So, Bryn, on the, uh, and I apologize. We got back on late, but. Um, every law officer and contact with the public. Um, so for example, uh, a DMV. Inspector is a law enforcement officer. If they are doing a, um, Truck check. And they're getting underneath the truck. Is that what they have to have the, um, The body camera going. No. So this, this would only apply to the Vermont state police. This require the specific requirement only applies to Vermont state police. So, and again, I'll just say that the, um, language was intended that requirement that it always be on when, um, the officers interacting with the civilian. It was intended to be broad and sort of general with the idea that Senate go ops was working on the actual policy. Um, that may provide some more specificity about when the cameras need to be on. Okay. Um, so moving at the same time, there was some, um, there was quite a bit of conversation about should they dive deeper, should the Senate dive deeper into when the cameras need to be on and the decision was made to leave it, leave it broad and general for now. Um, with the idea that there will be some requirement of, or model policy that is imposed by the state. Um, So, so I support the body camera language. I'm just wondering if maybe. It references a policy and push the date out. Uh, to that policy is adopted that the, um, the board puts together. Just a suggestion based on some of the prior conversation. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. So I see. Uh, Barbara not, or I don't see your hand anymore. Uh, but I see Barbara and then Ken and not, or please correct me if I should be seeing your hair at your hand. And then up. Okay. Rob LaClaire and Bryn again, just let us know. Cause the questions are coming. Thank you. So, Bryn, I think my, I have two, I think quick questions. One is. Um, Um, To, uh, several points that have been made already. There's been reference to the fact that we thought, um, the law already required the model. Or the body, um, camera policy. So I wondered if that could be put in with the conditions of being eligible for grants in addition to putting the data in is. Um, policy because body cameras without policy don't do us any good. So I don't know. Bryn, if that. Suffices from what we passed a few years ago to count it as something we've asked law enforcement. To do already. So what the requirement of that bill was that the law enforcement advisory board established, um, come up with a model policy on use of body cameras and report back to the legislature with, uh, recommendations on, um, legislative action that should be taken on those. Okay. So there exists a model policy and this is what I'll send to the committee as soon as I can, um, a link to the model policy. Um, but there was not a required. They're currently is not a requirement. Um, that that law enforcement agencies adopt that policy. And that is what the Senate government operations committee is working on now. Thank you. Thank you. My other question is this, when you talked about, um, Having the first, sorry. So one enforcement had asked about, um, Locally sanctioning. An officer first before it went up to the council. Right. For the first front for the first offense. I think it's the first offense. I think it's the first offense. I think that 20, I think it's 2307 entitled 20. Yes. That's my understanding of the history of that existing law. So what if law enforcement didn't give. Would it still be eligible to go up to the council or it only is if a sanction was given. Will you say that again, if it's a first defense, did you say, right? And so law enforcement agency chooses to just. Give any kind of written. Sanction. What happens at that point or what can happen. Can it go up to, can it go up to the council for them to. Decide what if they think there still needs to be a licensure. My understanding is that if it's a first offense, it's an agency to deal with that complaint. And it does not go to the council. Except for as the bill provides, there's an exception to that rule for the new two types of category B conduct. But as it, as current law stands right now for that category B conduct, it is for the agency to discipline that officer. It's up to the agency and it doesn't go to the council. So if they don't discipline the officer and then there's another one, is it considered a first offense because the first one wasn't written up. It's a second offense. I think it's a second offense. No, my understanding is that after there, there is a record of the first offense and the second offense has to go to the council. Even if they, if the local law enforcement didn't take action, there's still going to be a record of it. That is my understanding. Yes. Thank you. Okay. Ken. And I think I'm forgetting somebody else. I don't see any hands up anymore, but. I think Rob LaClaire, maybe did you have your hand up before? I did add my hand up madam chair, but I got my question answered. Thank you. Okay. Great. And Ken. I'm all set. Thank you. Okay. All right. Great. So I don't see any hands. Okay. Thank you. Go ahead, Bryn. So that concludes the S two 19. We've got the effective date section, which I think I mentioned as we went through. We've got the effective date section. And then we've got the effective date section. That, that contingent, that grant funding being contingent on law enforcement agencies reporting their data. Takes effect in January. And the requirement that BSP be equipped with body cameras takes effect on August 1st of this year. And the rest of the bill takes effect on passage. And then the title of the bill is, is renamed. But that's it for S two 19. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Will you be able to join us? During our new into two. Yes. Great. Okay. So why don't we let. Bryn go. Thank you so much. Really. Thank you. I'm sorry that I have to leave before you. Absolutely. No. Yeah. Thank you. All right. So committee, I'm going to. Change what I said. Given. Given that we don't have a brain to do a walkthrough of the commission. I'm just going to. I'm just going to say that we have, I'm hoping that we can take some testimony. On this bill. And. The commissioner DPS commissioner is here. Be great to start with you, please. I can have a commissioner. Are you, I see you here. Just give them a minute. I am here. Madam chair. Okay. Thank you so much. Did you want me to start in any particular place? There is an enormous amount of ground to cover. I know there is. Yeah. So. No, I just said you're, we'd appreciate your comments on. The commission. I think we're going to have a meeting next. Two 19. And then hopefully you'll be able to join us at noon. I know it's not the most optimal way of doing it, but at least we could, we could start the conversation. I will not be on at noon. We have a COVID. Actually, it may be on at noon. But, but only briefly. We're meeting from noon to two. So. I guess let me start with two 19 and go. I also have some notes on some of the questions that committee had. That'd be great. Okay. So section one. Grants and reporting. No issues there. I would only flag for the committee. You know, we've suggested in our. Collective 10 point strategy that. This policy should go further. That, you know, the, the number of grants the state gives to local law enforcement agencies is fairly limited. So I'll just flag that for the committee. Collecting data on the use of force and stops. Again, we're going to go quite a bit further beyond what's memorialized here in statute. We're going to go with a new. What hopefully will become a statewide data collection system. To collect use of force data on all encounters, not just traffic stops. So no issues there. The physical force definition, I would suggest a more simplistic approach. In the best policies out there. I think that any force is generally defined as something beyond. Any force beyond compliant handcuffing. So it's a would catch a wider range of things. And not allow for. Any. Anything to fall between the cracks. I think it's over defined. In paragraph five. There was a question in race data collection around probable cause and collecting data around that. The reason that's not collected in race data collection is because it's qualitative, not quantitative. There is no way. To check a box and measure the types of. Of probable cause because it's dependent on facts and circumstances that change with the encounter. So that's why it's not collected. In section. Four. No issues. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. With. The types of things that would go to be reported to the council. I do want to raise one very large red flag and the definition of a prohibited restraint. It is. Not there is no carve out for a circumstance where lethal force would be warranted. If you're in a. A fight for your life. Or you're trying to defend someone else that actually recall back. These things are so infrequent that you have to go back a ways to get certain examples, but if you go back. 25 or 30 years, we had a man wielding a knife on the marketplace in Burlington and based on that. The environment we were in using a firearm was not possible. We were able to do that. We had officers assigned that if they could get close enough. Lethal force was authorized. Using different kinds of methodologies like batons, or if you could actually get close enough to them. A neck restraint. In that particular circumstance. Would be a valid tactic. So we would strongly suggest that. These things are prohibited in any instance where lethal force is allowed to use a firearm against someone else. But you have to have that carve out because the way it's written now. You could use a firearm against someone or you could hit them with a car. But you couldn't use a neck restraint. And so it's incongruous with the operating environment. So that carve out, I think is, is essential. To make this a functional. So that's what we're going to be talking about. Excuse me. So I see a Martin, you have a question. Yeah, I actually wanted to. Back up. Although what, what this conversation is pretty critical. It seems as well. But so I'll ask a question about that first. And then I have a question about. Section three. So, so how did, did you have language that you would be proposing for that? Commissioner. Yeah. I think that's a good question. For the, for the prohibited restraint, what you were just talking about the, the, the carve out. I think it just needs to say something along the lines of, unless lethal force is appropriate. Okay. All right. So just backing up to, to section three. You talked a little bit about probable cause and such and check in a box, but. I think you could explain the reason for the stop and would that encompass the probable cause possibly or. It's reasonable grounds to, to make a stop. Not probable cause threshold. Different threshold for subsection B, the reason for the stop. Yes. And the reason for the stop can be briefly articulated with a check box. So a moving violation and non moving violation. A third party report of erratic driving. A stop for investigative reasons. You know, the car was suspected of just doing a drug deal. It was suspected of being involved in a burglary three blocks away. So doing a quantitative analysis using a multi select kind of scenario is, is what is set up now. To articulate what probable cause led to a search that the nuances of that is not possible to do using check boxes and a quantitative analysis. It would be a qualitative type of explanation. Okay. I understand that. All right. So the, one other question I had was the meaning of effectuating the stop and, and whether we need to, it sounds like law enforcement understands that that includes the reason for the stop. Not just getting the person pulled over, but whether we should have something a little more, a little clearer, like effectuating or during the stop. I would submit that effectuating is a jargony term that doesn't shouldn't exist anymore. It's just the reason for the stop. Okay. So it sounds like we should maybe add some. Non jargony clarifying language there. All right. Thanks. So the, the more that whether it's policy or statute or allies less on jargon and more on simple English is better. Thank you. Yeah, I'm not seeing any hands so can continue please. In section five. We create a new crime. This already exists. It's called aggravated assault. If you do something illegal and cause death or serious bodily injury to someone, it's aggravated assault or it's murder. There, this is a duplicate. I'm not sure what its point is other than to make a statement. And so I would urge the General Assembly to shy away from making a statement, especially as it relates to responding to something that did not happen in Vermont. This just strikes me as over politicizing an issue that we really need to focus on and driving a wedge versus being productive. And I'll just leave it at that. Video equipment. As I've testified previously, it's unnecessary as we're on the precipice of signing a contract that actually may have deleterious effects on our ability to negotiate with a vendor that kind of boxes us in. So I would suggest striking it. But at the same time, it doesn't. Other than potentially costing the taxpayers more money, there's no downside to specifying that we deploy these in the state police. Relative to policy. I think there's a lot more work that needs to happen. And I would not suggest codifying when cameras are used. I'll just give you a couple of examples. As it's currently written. There's a direct conflict with constitutional law, both in a federal level and in Vermont and when we're allowed to record people without their permission. And I don't know if you officers find themselves in places like public restrooms. I don't know that Vermonters want cameras on in public restrooms when we're in there. So a, again, this is a, I go back to some of my testimony a week or so ago. That directing the implementation of best practice. Is the right balance here. Not. Not specifically articulating what the policy should be. Not only because you can, the policy has to evolve. Sometimes on a weekly basis, we're making modifications as best practice evolves. And as we learn more, not only from what's happening here in Vermont, but on a national nationally. But because there are unintended consequences like conflicts with the judiciary and some of the things that they've laid out in terms of privacy considerations. And then there are unanticipated things like walking into public restrooms that you in a, in a rush to try to get something out the door, we will not be able to vet thoroughly. I'm commissioner. Okay. Can you please talk more about the conflicts with, with federal law and constitutional law? Sure. One example, we can't enter a house in Vermont without, and record without getting permission from the people who are there. So we have to say, do you, is it okay if we record this and we come inside and so let's create a scenario. It's, it's today, there's no one to record. And it's on the outside of the house, the house is 94 degrees or it's January and it's 12 below zero. And you're trying to speak with a, what doesn't matter. I guess, let's pick a domestic violence victim. And you need to go in the house and they say, no, I don't want you to record. Well, now you've got a statutory overlay that says you have to record and you've got a case law overlay that says you're not allowed to because they have a constitutionally protected area that that would be an illegal search. So that's one example. There are a number of others. Thank you. Tom, Representative Burdick. Thank you, Commissioner. Commissioner, I'm going to assume that if there's a warrant, you can probably record or would it have to be specifically spelled out in a warrant that may happen, that it could happen or will happen? We would normally put that we would write that into a search warrant to record and take photographs inside a property. But if there's someone there, when we execute that search warrant and we're wearing a camera, we still have to comply with getting consent to record them inside. Huh, okay. I didn't see that coming. There's a pesky couple of constitutions in play that give us the parameters around which we we operate in the overwhelming number of circumstances. Yeah, we've said that many times in this committee that pesky constitution, but you know, it's in place for a reason. So. Martin. I think Selene was before me. I'm sorry. Selene. Order order. But my question is about body cameras. I've just been reading a lot about the case for and against body cameras through a lot of different lenses and this statutory provision aside, Commissioner, I'm wondering if you could talk more about the goal, the goals that you have for the implementation of using body cameras that you said is already in the work. Yeah, so to clarify where we're at, we're in final negotiations with a selected vendor now and funding is in place. The body cameras are not a panacea. There is no panacea to what happens on the street. And actually, I should take this opportunity. I keep neglecting to do this because there's so much to cover for anyone who has not spent a shift in a police car somewhere in Vermont. I cannot urge you strongly enough to go do that, particularly in places where the call volume is more substantial in our small cities in some of our larger towns. It is essential to see how things operate on the street and the scope and depth of the challenges that Vermont faces as you're making these kinds of policy choices. So with that said, cameras are not a panacea. They are one tool that helps to create transparency. In some cases, clarity. In other cases, not as much. You've all seen body camera video that's shaky and out of whack or the cameras on the ground. Well, the officer is not or the officers on the ground and the cameras in the air, one or the other. It is just one more contemporary tool to create transparency in the most visible arm of government operations, which is policing. And it supplements other video, which in more urban areas is more common, but it is incredibly common to have video of law enforcement operations that's taken by third parties or surveillance cameras, historically dash cameras, and now increasingly body cameras. So I think that's the best description. Is it going to solve anyone problem in its entirety? No. Is it going to create additional challenges? Yes, including the privacy challenges that we're talking about today. But I do believe that we're at a stage we're at a stage where cameras are like any other critical tool that police officers carry on a day-to-day basis. It's something that we're not too far away from officers saying, hey, I'm not comfortable going out on the street because my camera is broken or my camera battery is dead or something along those lines. It's an essential piece of 21st century policing and transparency. If I could just ask a really quick follow-up question. So I'm really hearing you talk primarily about the goal of transparency, which I'm happy to hear. But I think there's also some research I'm seeing that says that body cameras may in some instances actually increase arrests, prosecution, and guilty police. And I'm wondering if that look, do you see this as just another tool for police to also get the job done or is the or is the goal for DPS primarily that transparency piece? That's a great question. I don't actually think in Vermont my experience has been that we've seen the opposite. You may have clearer evidence on certain kinds of cases and whether that results in more guilty pleas. I don't know the answer to. But in many instances it actually de-escalates this scenario. People who are not influenced by some other force like substances or something else often, not unilaterally, but often will de-escalate when they know they're being recorded because they don't want that captured and plastered all over the news or social media. To be clear that I was looking at was not, it was not localized data. It was from like actually international studies even. Yeah and those studies continued to come and I haven't looked at a use of force study with body cameras deployed recently but the most recent ones I'm aware of that are a couple of years old showed dramatic decreases in the amount of force used and in large part when you then go back and unpack the, you can actually go into because Vermont is so small when you look at that you can look at who force is used on and I know it's going to surprise you to find out that sometimes it's the same people over and over again and repeated encounters but sometimes those folks, the amount of times that force is necessary decreases because of body cameras and the fact that they're being recorded and they become a little less combative or belligerent as a result. So that's a piece of the puzzle. I think there's an oversight component for police officers. That's a piece of that puzzle as well but by and large I think the national experience with cameras has been has been positive. Not uncomplicated but generally positive. Thank you very much. Martin your hand is down now. I'm sorry was your question answered? Yeah I'm fine. Okay and Natter. Thank you. Commissioner quick question and I apologize if you've already touched on this but regarding section six can you talk about the cost of storage because I know that that is something that's been brought up in the past and right now would the way it's written being rather broad and basically recording almost everything that the officer is doing would storage and the cost of storage become an issue? It could that's a great question. The cost of storage has come down exponentially. The cost of units has come down exponentially but they're still expensive and the ongoing software as a service and cloud storage is the bulk of the cost. I would have to go back to our numbers and the estimates that we put into our negotiations to see whether there's an impact. There is an impact the question is how much but again as a piece of policy I don't think that that is going to work. As I mentioned there are conflicts in a variety of places so again I would urge the the General Assembly to direct the implementation of best practice policy but not to go line by line and and say what that policy is. It would be stale as well the draft you have would be stale immediately. Any draft that you might try to create in its wake would likely be stale within a few weeks because we're constantly changing the key policies to stay current. Thank you. Great thank you. I'm seeing any other hands. Okay thank you. Anything else commissioner? On 219. Yeah I'm just looking at the senate amendment to see if there's I think it's it's more intent than anything. I think I've addressed most of it. I'm going through the questions. I think I got most all the questions I wrote down while the committee was talking I think I addressed. Okay I do see a hand up Ken and then committee members I'll ask you before we adjourn to go to the floor if you if you do have any other questions. Ken. Good morning commissioner thank you. This bill are we making it so difficult that law enforcement is putting their lives more at risk. There are some components of some other bills that you're looking at that I do fear are going to create potentially decades of confusion as we wait for case law to evolve particularly with the the creation of a statutory overlay for the use of force. So I'm happy to get back into that a little bit further. You know I'd stop short of saying it's going to put people's lives at risk. I think it will put it'll put a lot of different things at risk and at and with more question marks I guess than the known risk because it's really difficult to predict exactly what's going to happen. But you know there are many areas where we've got to make immediate progress and the last few weeks have provided an opportunity to accelerate that progress and modernization that we've been talking about for years and have even put a variety of strategies on the table in January for consideration. So important to balance you know there's a few fragments I think that have been floated that are are frankly more political than they are operational they're not really going to do much for Vermont their response to things that are happening in other places in the country and while I understand the desire to respond to those things there are many things we can do here in Vermont including the 10 points that we've put forward in addition to the modernization strategy that we talked started talking about in January all of those things many of which go way beyond what's being discussed in legislation are things we need to act on now not let this moment pass so that I know that doesn't answer your question directly but it's a long way of saying you know I think there's a few things that are on a page right now that are either unnecessary or potentially hazardous but there are more things that aren't on the page that we've got to do so I go back to my suggestion which is the the power of this body is to direct us to make progress in certain areas you don't always have to spell out exactly how that progress needs to be made but put a timeline on it and not only tie it to grants but I would say tie it to any state support for your operations at all no academy no training no basically we're just going to neuter your ability to operate if you don't comply with best practice in these 10 key areas and potentially beyond that so so I want to be perfectly clear a couple things I think I think first of all I like your 10 points that that you brought up I think that's critical one of my biggest concerns about this whole thing is by you by by legislator not letting or putting more restrictions which some need to be don't misunderstand me but I feel that we could be putting more innocent people bystanders whatever at risk because there could be more of an altercation of of different things happening that's one of my big concerns I think you've already touched on it that people are going to resist arrest they're resisting more arrests all the time now when the anxiety and stuff takes over the body people do crazy crazy things and that's a concern that I have and and and and a question I just really want to ask because I know everybody's for time but are we rushing a lot of this legislation too fast I think there's a couple pieces that are rushing in response to wanting to be on the map of you know whatever national publication says these states did x and I want to be really clear we are firmly in the camp of embracing oversight embracing more restrictions really on or more parameters around how law enforcement operates on a national scale and to the extent necessary in Vermont it's how you do that we've got to find the best mechanisms to do that it's not a question of whether you do it it's how you do it and again I think there is a framework for doing this that can yield really positive results for Vermont and without creating uncertainty and I think there's a couple of areas that are again we haven't really gotten to yet with the exception of this new criminal penalty specific to law enforcement which is is just it's just not necessary it's called aggravated assault spent on the books for decades but there are a couple of others that that are not right in my opinion not ready for primetime are going to create more ambiguity and confusion potentially again for decades while courts try to figure out what certain words mean then we have now which is a very well constructed constitutional standard for the use of force it's how we create policy from that is the area of opportunity that we've got and I think the general assembly is in a place where you could direct that and create more strings tied to that that would really be meaningful thank you sir Martin yeah real quick if you uh commissioner if you could send that your 10-point plan I guess we call it to to our committee assistant so we could have it posted that would be appreciated certainly uh which assistant sorry to Mike Bailey got it okay thank you on that I would say both because I saw uh representative Copeland Hansa shaking her head yes yeah all right both yeah thank you thank you so much Andrea Hussey can put it up on the gov ops committee page as well thank you got it okay any other questions and when I say committee I mean both committees we're one committee for now right now uh I'm not seeing any hands Sarah anything you'd like to add or I want to thank the commissioner for being with us and and urge you to um to send someone who can help us again this afternoon uh where our agendas are evolving rapidly as we adapt to when legislative council is available and we do have two bills that we're trying to get through here today and tomorrow so we would really appreciate having uh having your participation in all of these conversations so thank you great and I would like to echo that as well um and to folks who are quite you know so to speak in the room um we're going to testify I'm sorry we we didn't get to you um but we will uh this afternoon and I think it's helpful for everybody to hear the questions and and testimony uh moving moving forward so thank you everybody and I appreciate your flexibility and uh staying staying here and and uh I know we are on the floor so I will uh adjourn and we will go off record


Hi everyone, Joe for Jaspy's casebreaks.com coming at you with 2018 tops update series baseball Hanger box break number six ram team written number six and at the end given away the final seven spots in that bowman draft Asia Edition break that's coming up in a separate video right after this This box this filler break is not too bad either. We can chase some sodos some otanis some mcunhas So let's do the break first and then in a different dice roll will random re-randomize your names and give away those final Seven spots. Thanks everyone. Let's roll it. Let's randomize it three and a six nine times for names and teams one two three four and Ninth and final time after nine we got Chad down to run three and a six nine times for the teams and Ninth and final time after nine we got the m's down to the bow socks Why don't you that? All right, there's the first half of the list right over here No trade second half of the list right here Alec with the Cubs last spot mojo. Let's get all this on one page Sort by column B and let's print and Rip you got it. There you go. There's go labor day rookie card There's a Ronald Acuna junior nice Braves Chad Meyer Cunha junior rookie card and And Evan with the Yankees you'll get the Glaber day labor Torres There's a legend in the making Acuna junior rookie Austin meadow. That's not bad That is that there you go. All right now to the important stuff, which is who's gonna win Those Bowman draft spots. Let's grab everyone's names from Martin down to Nick and everyone in between Let's roll it. Let's randomize it Two and a three five times top seven after five good luck one two three four and fifth and final time after five Now from eight on down Martin sorry sad times Sad times everybody here from eight down to 30, but I appreciate you giving it a shot. Thank you Um top seven happy times for you. Congrats Brian Crouch Ryan Nick Nick Alec Nick and mark Wow Nick with three out of the seven spots.  Thanks everyone for giving this a shot once again. Congrats again to the winners. I'm Joe I'll see you for the break. Bye. Bye


We got about 40 trillion cells in the human body. We got 39 trillion bacteria. So we're 50-50. There's the human self and there's the bacteria self.   I would tell you the average person, most of the bacteria that they encounter throughout their lives are good bacteria. Most of that good bacteria lives in your gut. Most of it in the last part of your gut called the cecum. And by the way, right next to the healthy gut bacteria in the wall of your intestines, okay, is your immune system. And we know that when you treat your gut bacteria well, the gut bacteria treats your immune system well and helps your immune system fight cancer.


You're going cold, yeah, going cold, don't warm up. Go and dry. Ah, oh yeah. Oh, Mike. Touchdown, Toronto, day two. We took the red eyes, so pretty crazy night. Left Sacramento at nine o'clock in the morning. Got here at 10 o'clock in the morning with the time change three hours ahead. A little exploring yesterday. A little bit of work and training tonight. Mr. Alberto Nunez and Leanna Carr in the house. We got a cool project for Kaizen in the works. So stay tuned for more info on that. Obviously the homie Omar Isoff is here in Toronto. It's where he lives. But for now, it's time to venture a little bit before we get down to work. Touristy things, because touristy things are what make the city kind of unique and remember. Hopefully that guy watches me and doesn't just want to be on the channel. He's asking for a shout out. So we did the CN Tower. Now Sandy wants to go shopping. Lululemon is from Canada's. So we're gonna go find a Lululemon, even though we don't think it's from here. We think it's from Vancouver. We don't know, comment below. So we're gonna venture around a little bit and then meet up with Omar and Alberto. The phone covers my one. I'd like to live my life dangerously. So what are we doing here? I'm asking you. Did you give the house tour already, bro? I wanna know how far you are in your vlog, so I know. All I got is. This is the opening shot. Dope. Dope. Key word dope. Toronto B-roll. It's so dope it's A-roll. So just the whole video is gonna be music and footage. Yeah, dubstep. Oh, dubstep. Can we introduce the most jacked yoga instructor I know? No. So we found Lululemon's newest ambassador. The background right now too, like with the brick and the fucking, yeah. It's gold, dude. Yeah. Do you do yoga? Do you actually? I wonder about functions too. We got mega zoom on this thing. We'll see what happens. Fortress is about to get a special treat. We'll do the house tour on the way back. I nominate you to give the house tour. Absolutely. Except not down there. We're gonna find the poultry guys. The lady lives. She's super chill. I think it might be, these might be her paintings. I'm like, these are all super cute. Six o'clock at night. We got Kaizen filming late night because the gym, every gym is crowded during the day. So to get you guys the highest quality videos, we stay up to odd hours of the night. We did at Barbara Brigade and now we're doing it at Fortress Fitness here. So we can turn on the music and get you guys the best audio. Like I said, Kaizen, me and Omar Bart, training programs, but then super in-depth videos and stuff that comes along with it. Typically it comes with the PDF, Excel training of the program, plus videos, not only information on that program, which is general strength information. So now we're gonna go train ourselves. I've been lifted in about two days. Eight pretty decent today. Had that chicken sandwich. Cruised around Toronto with Sandy. Now we met up with the crew. Don't know what I'm gonna train because my schedule's a little off, but diet feels a little better. Waters, intake's back to normal. Making sure I chug a lot of water. Toronto's super cool because it's super walkable. I know I just said super, super, super a million times. It's very walkable. Super. It's super dope. There you go. Super dope. But it's very walkable. So it allows me to get at least some kind of food in and some kind of hydration. Fortress fitness.  What's up? So we got one rep max.  A nice, relaxed, Tracy McGrady face single. Yeah, I like that. I like that. Tracy McGrady's a good one. Tracy McGrady, the issue, though, is that he has like droopy face. Not only like serious, but like droopy. What's a guesstimate of what your one rep's gonna be? Depends, man. I think anywhere between 300 to 330. Okay, and then drop back down. And then drop back down. I'll drop back down and do some fives. Yeah. Okay. And then we're gonna do that. Oh, I see. Okay. Crunchy. Oh, you want to have a little bit of crunchy. Okay. Oh, three reps and I'm out, Mike. Nah. I'm out. I'd like to go to 295, then 315, but I don't know if I'll go right to 315. Fortune solo by 34. It can't get any better, people. It's all right. So the guy's name is like, I don't know what that is. He's like so unknown. I guys don't know. I don't know what it's called.  Yeah. Connor yelled at you. And he said, hold the camera more. Hold the camera more? Yeah, like use it more. Me? That's what, yeah. Because he said, he said it's your job to film all this. That's not what Connor said. That's not what Connor said.  And Connor said, she's got to work. Is that how Connor said it? Connor. He needs to work. He said, hold the camera more. All right. I'm gonna do that. I'm gonna show you that part though. Sandy out Deluxe Connor, so. Like I've seen this Deluxe. And out Squawks. And out Squawks. I didn't want to embarrass him. That's all right. He's for sure gonna edit this part out. Fun fact. It's the only part of the footage that's edited out. Everything else stays. Let's go down, Michael. For sure. It's on the fingernail. Yeah, it really is. The solution, he's presented with three more problems. It's a pinnacle of breaking them. Yeah. And how does that work out? On the workout itself? Yeah, sure. You mean the workout you left me to do on my own? You mean the workout you did on my own? All by myself. You said you're gonna incline bench with me, bro. All by myself. Birdo took a look at my pecs and he said, you know what? Yeah, which way do your pecs go? Birdo knows. Like, he said this way and then that way. That way. That's what the Nego said. He said, do this all day. Over at Press Incline Bench. Which way do your pecs go, Birdo? Yeah, we took a look at my pecs. Refer to a video on Omar's channel. You're sure, yeah. Thanks about this time. No, you'll be out. Oh, yeah, you'll be out. It'll be out. Refer to the video on Peck Directions by Mr. Arbiter and Yes, which actually out of all the fitness things I've heard over the last, whatever, 15 years I've studied these things. Makes complete sense. Oh, and it's part of the original. Yeah. I've never heard of it. I've never heard of it before. And not that I know of it. What would it say to me, like, bro, are you back in the day? Yeah, yeah, yeah. What do you saw with bro? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, I dig it. One angle to rule the ball for the person. Actually, brother, this time, I saw you find your bro, like your bro man. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm a peck, I'm a dip guy. You dip guy? Let's go.  Dip guy, you got it. Nice fibers, bro. Nice fibers. That's how it starts, man. Before you know it. I bet you two are both pecs. Butt sex. No? What do we say in the Power Rangers video? You're like, anal, there's an anal. You said I put it in her butt. That was amazing. I put it in her butt. And then everyone senses the meme of the two, uh-oh.  Shh. Without you. Was this the most difficult thing? I mean, I was supposed to be convenient. Look at all my healthy friends. All my healthy friends. Ubered to four different ones. They were all closed. Then we finally found one, with the limited menu. But they had chicken breasts? Yeah, they had chicken breasts. That's pretty good for a limited. Yeah, no salad, but they had chicken.  What else did you get? You got his burgers and some chicken. Chicken, burgers, boom. And for you, just skip a bun? Yeah, just bun-less. That's all right. I might eat half of it. I like it. It could be worse, right? Yeah. You have the bread, what? Gram or two? Yeah. Do it. This is like 13 grams you found on the website. Oh, really? There's some oil. Yeah, they probably butter up the bun. And they probably butter up the chicken, or oil it up. McDonald's, the poor ladies, literally went to four different ones. They got it done. It's 1 o'clock, 2 o'clock 30. It's too late. We got a little bit of kaisen in there. Now it's time to eat. One video, bro, and the six were supposed to. Thank you. You're welcome. Here's your chicken sandwiches.  It's currently 2 o'clock at 55. We're going to call it a night. Got maybe a third of the project done. There's just a lot of background in it, right? Writing of the program, the organizing, the website, PDF, et cetera. But then also the actual content shooting takes some time. So a couple of days of that. Back at it tomorrow, probably sleep, hopefully sleep a lot, find some food, lift, back into action. Good night, everybody. Hustle, grind, keel. Noon, we're up till 3. Slip till about 11. Got ready. Now the ladies want to do some shopping. So we're going to go beat Liana and Burto to start the day. Stomp at a certain yoga-type clothing store. Sandy wanted to shop. Liana wanted to go shop. Liana and Burto lost their back, so they just had to grab clothes. But now it's time to snack and maybe a little adventuring. We all walked a ton. Oh, that's Whole Foods. That's nuts. I just got you guys some dope B-roll, but I didn't know it was Whole Foods. Whole Foods is one of my favorite spots. Just easy to eat. It's obviously everywhere. I guess I'll call it Amazon. Grab a snack. Still haven't heard from Omar. He's probably asleep, and then we'll figure the rest out. Only because they're here. Yeah, otherwise she would have gone pizza. That's only because you guys are here. That's it? Give us the explanation, sir. I'm on that low protein diet. No one's ever done that before. Just a low carb, low fat. That's it. Just carbs. I had protein over here, so. Easy enough. True. Got a salad, estimated an eyeballed the ingredients, and then some salmon, because we were fancy. Can you just put it on top or eat it separate? I eat it separate. I got a separate. I can eat it last. I know you guys are going to try this, because it looks delicious. It looks delicious. Game over. Chewed, emailed, showered, snack. Back to port of fitness with some really strong people. Strong man number one. Strong man number two. Say something funny.  Oh, hold on. You want me to film it for you? Oh, just first person? I want him to be one. Yeah, you can do self-emote if you want. No, I got it. No, I'm filming you. Like a tourist. Dude, this actually is a good angle. Cock out. Bench out. Let's go. Some Omar Esau music. There's a world. Dude, I love this. I know. We got World Champ. World Champ. And us, bro. World renowned. World renowned. Mike, is that inspirational to you? Six reps. Let's go, razor blade. No commando on it.  This is your number one go-to? No one does it. You go plate or dumbbell as well? I like a plate. I like a plate, yeah. You can't get over yourself with a plate. No zero gravity, you know. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. How about those dumbbells that are zero gravity? Where you shove your hand in it? Not zero gravity. Oh, I know what you're talking about. Yeah. It's like an Ironman fist. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Is that good? Have you used it? I've never tried that. I bet you'd like it. I want to try this with chest pressing. Yeah, yeah, I think so. Shoulder? Yeah. Shortens the lever because your pec attaches here. Yeah, I like it. Big delts. I dig it. I dig it. Can we get our rise up lights? We're called to extra through, bro. The champ showed up today, so we're stuck. I actually felt really good. The secret's a 20 minute rest, dude. 20 minute rest. Going cold. Yeah, going cold, no warm-up. Going dry. Oh, yeah. Oh, Mike.


Controllers and how are you doing? Man, it looks like a beautiful day there. Chichoyah Phenomenal. I've been working in the patio for a couple of days now just gardening buying soil, mixing the soil Potting stuff and whatnot and it's just amazing just seeing the plants growing I've planted some seeds and you see the seedlings coming up It's it's health.


Where is it? A Simon. So I've added some more instructions. So let's briefly go through what the first steps are. Read through the instructions. Here you need to write about attacks on S-I-T. So there's some ethics thing that we've mentioned at the start of the course, but basically don't do any attacks. Just think about them. Design them. And I think there are many simple things that you can think about that you can perform an attack on S-I-T. So read through that. Don't capture other traffic. Don't try and guess other people's passwords. Just if you want to test something, use your virtual network. You can use that to test some attacks. You have your groups, three tasks. First one is categorizing information systems. So we'll talk a bit about each. And I'll go through an example of there are many standards or guidelines for how to analyze the security of a system, to look at the risks involved, to classify the features of different systems. And one organization that creates many popular standards or guidelines is called NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the US.  Secure information systems. So you'll see many references to NIST documents. FIPS, some federal standard in the US, FIPS 199, SP, some special publication with many different numbers they have. So what your task in the assignment is to first think about SIT and think about the information systems. What's an information system? Think about as a student, the different computer systems that are available in SIT and that to use and store some information about students, about faculty, about other things. I'll give you some examples in a moment. Think about those information systems in SIT and then categorize what their requirements are in terms of CIA. Your first exam question. Confidentiality, what's I? Integrity, A, availability. Okay. So the general requirements, we will be confidentiality, integrity, availability. Then the next task will be to go through and look at the SIT information assets in SIT and think about the risks from a security perspective. And there's some methods for doing risk analysis for security systems, and that's what SP 800 dash 30 describes a methodology for doing risk analysis. Very complex and long. And then think about some controls to reduce the risks. So we talk about we use mechanisms to implement some security controls to reduce those risks. So attacks are unlikely to occur. We can't always remove all risks. We try to reduce them. And there's another document that lists many different controls that are available. I've tried to summarize the the way to categorize information systems to do a security risk analysis and some of the controls. So of these large documents, which are hundreds of pages long, I've tried to summarize the procedure into this overview which you have in front of you.  This summary of the procedure that you can go through. And I've taken a lot from those documents as well as from the textbook. It's what this is. It's a summary from those. I'll not go through all of it. You need to read it. For the first task, classify the different information systems in SIT. And this is what I want you to do in the next week and submit something in the next week. It's very easy. The idea is that we think of an information system like the grading system in SIT. Let's say there's some system for maintaining the grades for all students. We think about the different types of information in that system. Okay, the list of student names and ideas, the grades, the courses, so the information, and then we think about with respect to CIS, A, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. If that information is compromised in some way, what impact would that have on the organization?  With respect to each of these. And we will classify them as either low, moderate, or high. That is, if we have some information and someone, it's supposed to be confidential, but someone gets access to it, what impact does that have on SIT? Or on the student. That's what you need to think about. And then give some classification. Is it low impact, a moderate impact, or a high impact? And give some description here very broad descriptions. The other documents give some more detailed examples. And then we categorize the security for each information type. And let's go straight to an example, which is here. I've done an example. Let's say we have any the student, some system called a student management system, which contains two types of information, at least two types. Grades and student contact information, like your address, your phone number, and so on. So we say there are two information types, the grades and the contact info. Let's treat them separately. And for each of those types of information, we look at the potential impact if that information is breached in somehow. With respect to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. So with respect to grades, let's say there's a database that stores all of your grades. What happens if someone gets access to that? Breaches the confidentiality of those grades. What's the impact if someone from outside of SIT can see your grades? So from the perspective of confidentiality, you consider the impact. In this example, I say, well it's a moderate impact. It doesn't mean SIT has to shut down. It means that someone has seen the grades of the students. Not too bad, but not nice because that information should be confidential because it's private information to you. You don't want to be published on the web that you've got Fs in all of your courses. It can be embarrassing. So you give it some impact, low, moderate, or high. There's no one correct answer. I want you to think about the impact. That's if confidentiality is breached. Someone reads the values. What about the integrity of the grades? What if someone can access the database and change the grades? Impact high. If someone can access and change all the grades from Fs to A, then that's a very bad situation for SIT and the individuals in SIT. So integrity is very important. So the impact is high in that case. What about the availability of this information? We have a database such that students can access it and see their grades. What if someone does a denial of service attack and means for a week that those grades are not available to the students to access? Inconvenient? Yes. Doesn't mean SIT needs to shut down? Well, probably not. Making the grades available to people to read. In many cases it's not so important. We usually only need them at the end of the semester or when you create a transcript, for example. So maybe the impact there is low if the availability is breached. So this is the security categorization of the grades information. Then do it for other information types like contact information. All right, it should be confidential. But again, if someone finds your phone number, privacy not so good. Does it mean SIT is going to fail? Well, probably not. Integrity, what if someone accesses and changes your phone number? Well, maybe not cause any problems. So classification of low. Availability, maybe low. It doesn't matter so much if it's unavailable for some limited time. So think about the information types and then give some classification of the impact. And again, there's no one answer. People may have different answers and it's okay. That's of the information types. Then we consider the entire information system. The grading system or the student management system includes both the grades and the contact info. So of the student system, we give an overall impact. And the way to calculate it is that we look at confidentiality for each of the information types in the system and we take the highest value. So with confidentiality of grades, moderate impact, contact info, moderate, therefore for the system, moderate. Integrity for grades, high, contact info, low. For the system, high. It's the maximum of the values of the information. Saying that for this system, we need to make the integral. If the integrity is compromised for this system, there may be a high impact because it may be the grade information. So we take the highest of these really. And low and low of course produces low here. So that's easy. Once you've given some categories for each information type, you can determine the categories for the information system which contains that information. That's your first task in the assignment. And you can read in the assignment instructions. I give a template. Nothing special, but just so you can produce it in some format. So just an example. Sorry, let's zoom in. Almost done. So this is what you'll submit for task one. For your group, your group number, your names. I just need your first name so I know who's in the group. Then think about all the information systems with respect to SIT. Give them some name. The grading system. As an example, you may give it a different name. Give it a description. What do you mean by this system? What is it? And what types of information are in this system? Grades of students. Student ID numbers. So list the information types in the system. And then for another system in SIT, maybe the payroll system. So there are staff, faculty members that get paid. That's another information system. Separate from grades. There's no connection really there. But it's another information that's important to the operation of the organization. What information is in there? Okay. Staff contact info. Staff bank account. Staff salaries. That would be an accounting or payroll system. And then do that for others. Websites. Servers. Different, maybe a library. So different. Think of all the information that SIT maintains about you and about employees. And list them. Then of all the information types that have multiple, categorize using this approach for the information type. Maybe describe it. And just give this equation that says confidentiality, integrity, availability, and choose an impact. Easy. Low, moderate, high. It's the process of thinking about it that's important in this task. Do it for all the information types. And once you've done that, you determine the categorization for the different information systems which is just combined from the information types. You take the maximum for each of the information types and you get the impact here. Task one done if you can do that. I want you to submit by next Thursday your initial draft of this. Okay? So it will not be graded, but I'll give feedback on it if you submit. So if you don't submit, you won't get... Well, there will be no feedback on what you've done. But if you submit online, then I'll give some feedback to the class and maybe individually saying, yeah, this is on the right track or this is wrong. Okay? So just to force you to start doing something. And then we'll talk about task two and task three in more detail. They will follow on. Systems, I don't know. How many are there in SIT? Approximately more than three, less than 20, I guess. I would think so. I think you can easily think of more than three. I've given you two examples. Sometimes you can break them into more specific information systems. You can think of others, I'm sure. So you don't have to get them all. Okay? There's no complete set of information systems. So someone may have seven and someone else may have 10. And there may be some overlap, but there may be some distinct ones there as well. That's okay. But just try and think about different ones. It's a good exercise because it forces you to think about, well, what does SIT store about you in terms of information? And where do they store it and how important is that information? So think about it from a student's perspective, but also try and think you're an employee at SIT, a staff member, a faculty member. What information do you think that needs to be stored about them? Any other questions? No, this is just a thinking exercise. You don't need to really know much more than you already know about SIT because I think you can guess that with employees, there's some payroll or accounting system. Okay? With students, there are other information systems. Think about websites, servers, things that users access to find out about SIT, things that are needed to manage the organization. So it's just a thinking exercise. You don't need any software to do this. Any other questions? Okay. That will get you started. Again, read through the rest of the tasks, but once we get some feedback on task one, then I'll explain further about task two and then task three. We can do it in stages. The next task two is about risk analysis. So again, read through this overview, the one you've got the hard copy of. It looks complex at the start, but you find it's not so hard. There's a lot of information in these tables copied from the other source documents. Browse through them. You don't need to remember them all. It just gives examples. And then we'll explain how to use that.


The challenge of the Yukon With this and strongest lead dog of the north country Blazing the trail for sergeant Preston of the Northwest mounted police in his relentless pursuit of lawbreakers Gold gold discovered in the Yukon a stampede to the Klondike in the greedy race for riches Now back to the days of the gold rush when sergeant Preston and his wonder dog king Battle through storm and snow to preserve law and order as they met the challenge of the Yukon In the gold nugget cafe favorite rendezvous the miners and prospectors of Dawson city Steve Carlton sat alone at a table in the corner Steve was dark clean shaven and rather handsome except for a surly expression and a cruel mouth He looked up and smiled as rose decrees one of the entertainers came to his table and sat down How I I got a talk to you We can't go on like this no more now listen honey. Let's not get into that again. Why did you marry me?  We need money to live together the way I want to live Want me to keep working in here? I shouldn't think you'd like the idea of your wife. I didn't say it after keep working here forever Just long enough to help me do something How can working here help you? Did you get acquainted with that green horn? I pointed out to you last night. Mr. Wiseman. Yeah, I went over and sat at a table after you left. Did you find out anything about him? I'll let him. What'd you find out? He's from California Doesn't know much about prospecting but wants to buy a gold claim Looks as if he had plenty of money. I have a good friend that Said he sold his ranch in the States and came up here to try his luck Maybe it's just what we're looking for What do you mean? If he comes in here tonight, I want to meet him. I might I'll be dancing with you and I'll pass this table You stop and introduce it. Steve, why do you want to meet him? You want to be married and live like other women, don't you? Except maybe easier But lots of pretty clothes and a nice house sure Steve.  I mean you better not ask too many questions You better beat it Rose. What's wrong? Oh, you mean because Sergeant Preston came in? Yeah Why do you always look like this whenever you see that mountain?  Tell me what it is. Get out of here. I say all right, then Maybe I'll find out if I ask the sergeant. I'll ask him. No, come back here. Don't you dare ask him? Tell me that my brother was hanged on account of him No, brother You never told me you had a brother before you came up What did he do tell you some other time and that money watches me like a hook So get away from this table before he suspects we're working all right Steve, but I someday I'm gonna get him Him and that doggy Don't talk like that I'll help you with Marsden and then we'll go far away from me Please Don't talk about harm in a mountain. You know what that means.  All right, I'm going when my son gets here You'll find me over at the Faro table I'll look for you then I'll see you later Pete. Hello Bill. How about a song? Hello How are you here? How's the traffic? I find catch this window.  Hello there king You're some very happy in here. It's too smoky. I don't blame them. That's the way I'll see you. I'll see you later All right, well My define girl she was talking to Steve Carlton when I came in the air She's seen much of him Roger I have never seen such eyes like you You see everything Rose isn't hard to see in that red dress. Oh, she must be nice to all customers Yes, that's a business. I guess I was just wondering you do not like Steve Carlton. Oh, you know him pretty well Don't you care? Oh, he's mine. It is near my cabin, but but I do not see him much He is not so friendly. I don't see why he stays around here after what happened to his brother You think maybe Steve he was mixed up in that crime. We could never prove it Yeah, I have tell him about my bear cub that I catch would he never has come to see it Oh, how are you getting along with that bear to make a good bet? He's just quite big now Maybe you can stop me my cabin soon and see him. No, I'd like to matter of fact. I'm going north tomorrow morning I'll be right near your place. Why don't you stop and have breakfast? You know, I was hoping you'd say that yeah I remember the last breakfast you gave me you're the best cook. I know I'll be going past your place rather early though Well, that is fine me. I am up wrong before son I will give you good breakfast show you Michael Michael. That is what I call my bear I have named him after my uncle. All right. Yeah, I'll see you early tomorrow. Come on King Early the next morning Pierre loaded his stove with wood and then went outside the cabin to feed Michael his pet cub Who has chained to a stake outside? As he opened the door he cried out with alarm Michael Michael, where are you and through the woods following the tracks left by the bear? They led towards Steve Carlton's mind and then Pierre heard shots He ran as fast as he could toward the sound and again, he heard one as he approached the opening into Steve's mind Steve he has killed Michael My bear, where is he? What are you talking about? You you shot him. No, what are you snooping around here? I think maybe you shoot Michael you you see him maybe I haven't seen your bear But his track they come this way. I hear shot. I think Get out of here. That isn't why you came but why you shoot gun here in mine? Why you I see Steve You shoot gold into rock. Oh, you came to spy on me. Is that it? No, Steve. You do not do this You're salting mine maybe for to sell to someone You shoot gold into rock with shotgun. Then same mine is too rich Oh, you know on about soft no mine. Do you Frenchie? I suppose your friend sergeant Preston told you to watch we had given report That is not sure But but this it is against law. Well, you really stuck your nose into something this time my friend To me me. I'm old man. I If you are honest and do not try to sell this mine, I I will say nothing. Good job tooting. You'll say nothing.  I'm gonna say to it that you don't Steve what you mean? It's just too bad.  They got buckshot in them And i've got to use them Meanwhile sergeant Preston drove his dog team up to Pierre's cabin Discovering it to be empty. He walked around the house and saw the old man's tracks plainly outlined in the snow beside the broken chain Looks like the bear cut away king Maybe we better follow him. What do you say? Come on king. We'll follow his tracks here. I may need our help Let's go one way and here Come on king. That's Pierre Find him king. He's in that wine. I got that gun. You're under arrest.  Leave that gun on the ground. Don't try anything or i'll let him take you apart Stand up against the side of the mine while I have a look at Pierre. Keep him there king. Don't let him move I will and you'll hang for murder just the way your brother did.  No. Pierre de Bois. I'll get you first Preston Somehow Sergeant Preston thought he had seen the last of him But it was only the beginning of one of the most dangerous adventures the malty had ever experienced One night weeks later Rose de frieze jumped up an alarm when she heard a knock on her window I mean you've got a way from constable to can they be around to tell how You didn't kill a monk with self-defense wrap this blanket around you Oh, he wanted to do it. I couldn't come to talk to you at the trial. I couldn't tell people you were my husband Why didn't you let me help you? I'd do I'd get away somehow I didn't want anyone to know They'd be watching you fight that away Just can't believe you're here and when I had to let you go Without even saying goodbye Don't cry now Steve I'll find you nobody'll find me if you'll help me They'd never dream of looking right here in the hotel You can hide me in this room for a day or so It's so good to see I I can't believe you deliberately murdered me I never believe who you believe the truth We had a fight try to kill me first Was an accident We were struggling for the gun Went off like I said But Preston has always hated me they took his word for it when he said I shot the air All right I guess when you're in love with someone you Believe what you want to believe about it. I know you'll stick by me. What are you planning to do? Do you any money?  I'm strong.   All right before we cross the border. I have a couple of things to do. What? What do you mean never mind Tomorrow you get those supplies bring them in a few at a time during the day so people won't notice that I will see And you better inquire around and find out where sergeant Preston is Sergeant Preston Why Steve why do you want to know there? You don't think I want to get caught Find out where he is I'll know where to go to avoid them. Oh, I'll find out for you. I'll find out tomorrow One more trip today will be ready Uh-huh. He's going to 40 miles. We'll take him two days to get there. He's probably there now 40 mile We better head south before he gets back 40 miles down the way to the border You don't want to go there a person there. We can watch ourselves I see that we don't meet him on the trail Steve You're planning to kill him That's why you want to go that way. What are you talking about? Don't you see that it makes sense to go that way If Preston comes back from 40 mile without seeing us on the trail, he'll be sure we didn't go that way Rose Why don't you trust me? I do trust you on me But I'm afraid if you cared anything about me, you'd believe me Steve I I do I'll go wherever you want me to Now you're talking We'll leave on the trail of 40 mile tonight Or three days Rose plotted doggedly at Steve's side on the trail toward 40 mile The pack she carried was heavy But Steve rumbled when she wanted to rest and she knew she was slowing him down Hope we make 40 miles by tonight We come too far already Oh, don't you think we ought to make camp and then I don't know why it's what It ain't much better time alone We'll make 40 mile tonight This pack is so heavy It's a dog team coming Get off the trail. Come on back here in the woods behind that big group of fruit trees. I'm coming All right. Don't be around spending a minute. Oh wait, Steve. I can't run with but it's heavy bag. I'll help you Come on Here behind these trees I didn't see that long Here, I'll take your arm.  I can't walk on get up on your feet and try it that camp out here forever Try stepping on it hard. You can stand a little pain. I can't do it.  You wouldn't just leave me sure. I'll come back What do you take me for buy some wood here beside you and leave enough food I'll be back tomorrow be alone out here in the wilderness I'll see you steam all in freight. That's all we can do. I tell you If you leave the gun, we then perhaps if you know not how to shoot a gun You'll be safe with a fire If it gets dark for a while, quit worrying I'll get some wood dick darkness closed down around roads as she sat alone frightened and helpless As the long hours passed she piled wood on the fire to keep the flames leaping high And the supply beside her dwindled fast Then suddenly an eerie cry cut through the silence a cry that sent a chill of fear through her practically she put more of the precious wood on the flame And then the cry came again from another direction Agent Preston returning on the trail from 40 mile Faulted his dog team and prepared to camp for the night As he started to unhitch his dogs King standing beside him suddenly sniffed the wind Pricked his ears forward and growled What's the matter king? Oh Those are only thunder wolves boy. They've never bothered to before The last of the wood on the tiny flame and her cry for help made the fiery eyes draw back Which form of the wolf technically now? Closer closer it came And the other wolf began to circle behind her A gasp of horror sprang from the girl's lips as she saw the animal crouched full of spring and she covered her face with her arms But at that moment another gray form sprang from the darkness as the huge body of king hurtles face I shot the other one Your dog's face these slices didn't do boy I hope he doesn't hurt bad. He'll be all right. What on earth are you doing here alone? I'd Blame my ankle. I broke it. I couldn't walk My husband and I were going to 40 miles He he went on alone to get help your husband But I didn't know he was married. Who's he? You don't know funny. I didn't meet him on the trail. I just came from 40 miles Oh Something must have happened to him. Well, I'll get you back to my dog sled. There's a cabin a few miles from here belongs to a Trapper, I know Did you hear me screaming? Is that how you happened to come? We were pretty far from here, but king must have heard you and that's how we happened to come I hope my life to that dog might have happened if he had to come Don't think about that rose now. We'd better get you to jen's cabin as soon as we can Trapper's small windowless cabin was furnished crudely Rose sat on the only chair beside the table on which a lamp burned dimly Some dry spruce branches in the corner served as a bed Sergeant Preston put more wood on the fire in the small stove there. That should hold it for a while Good to be warm again. How's the ankle now? Much better since you're bandied. Good. Well, I guess we better go back in the woods and cut some new branches for this bed These are all dried up. You're doing too much. Don't bother. That won't take long I guess jet must be away looking over his trap line. Nobody's been here for a day or so Come on king. Want to go with me? We won't be going long. All right, sergeant Please he saved my life.  I couldn't catch up. Oh Steve, put down that gun.  Don't get away from me. Stand right here behind us and see You didn't care anything about me The only reason you came back to me was to get money for supply. The only reason I came back after I escaped Was to get Preston.    I killed the constable who was taking me to Ottawa And now I'm getting another one When he comes in that door the light will be right in his eyes I've got another bullet for that dog. Oh Steve, please Go away before it's too late.  What's the matter boy? Some kind of animal around? A great dog had caught the scent of a man that he remembered A man who had once tried to kill his master Desperately he pressed against the Monty's leg growling and whining to warn him of his danger The trail of the man led to the cabin door and king knew that's where he was waiting What his master was walking directly toward that danger Again king growled and barked What are you trying to tell me fellow? King realized that the sergeant didn't know his danger Then frantically the big dog tugged at the Monty's pocket growling and whining trying to tell him to stop Here let go king. What's the matter with your boy? What's bothering you?  I ought to let him tear you to pieces.  It wasn't your throat. All right sergeant. Did those shots? I missed me ther eggs Thanks to your breaking that lamp rose should have killed her first. I wouldn't have helped much steve King warned me that something was wrong. It'd been a window in this cabin. I'd have known what it was I wasn't in that doorway when you fired. I was beside it holding king But the dog I thought he was when you knocked the lamp down rose. I let him go I knew king could see in the dark that rotten dog but hadn't been found yet That'll do steve Once again, you're under arrest and this time i'll guarantee that your case will be closed forever The challenge of the ucon a copyrighted feature is brought to you each week at this time and all characters names and incidents used are fictitious Listen again next week to another exciting adventure during the days of the gold rush El prowl speaking this program came to you from detroit Does this sound familiar? driver of grocery truck and trailer kidnapped merchandise hijacked Hijackers barricade roads steel truckload of soap Yes, those items sound like they came from the headlines, don't they? As a matter of fact, they were part of a david harding counter spy show broadcast not so long ago On this particular broadcast david harding and the counter spies set out after a fictitious band of hijackers But the drama sounded so real that many listeners phoned in congratulating producers of the show on their timeliness Another thing that enhanced the reality of this fictional story Was the fact that the fbi had cracked down on a ring of 21 hijackers just the day before But it isn't unusual for counter spy to mirror the headlines The fresh new subject matter is constantly in keeping with the times For 30 minutes of suspenseful excitement catch