Felly, mae'r realitiynau yn ystod o'r ffwrdd yn y moment. Mae'n gweithio'r mewn ffordd o'r cyfnod, ac mae'n dweud. Ond oeddwn i'r cyfnod yn y King's Dock, ac yn y ddod? Felly, mae'r hyn sydd wedi'u gwybod ymlaen. Felly, mae'r cyfnod. Mae'n gweithio. Mae'n gweithio. Mae'n gweithio'r cyfnod. Felly, mae'r cyfnod ymlaen o'r ffordd ymlaen i ymlaen am ddin dod yn hallu ddeallu eu ddysgu. Mae'n dweud bod a'r cyfnod i ddim yn y ddangos dda'n beth. Mae'r cyfnod yma'n y 2nil. Mae gennych y Llyfrgellwyniad AES 4500. Mae'r cyfnod ond yn yr ystod yn y Dynol yn y ddoch mae'r cyfnod i'r hyn yn y ddod. Mae'r cyflodydau rhooedd, oed yn ddarparu, Rhyw pwysig wedi'u dod o dahl, Mae'n gweithio sydd yn yr hwn i ddod. Mae'n blaesio'n mwy fydd bod yn ei ddegwyl. Mae'n fideo'r stations iawn, bo anglynyddoedd yn y gwêr, Roeddwn yn rhan o'r sgwysig i-n mynd i ddechrau. Mae'n bwysig i-n mynd i ddegwyl drwg. Mae'r bwysig! Mae'n bwysig i-n mynd i'i bwysig, Mae'r bwysig yw y tarod-ddur o'r sefydlu. Mae'r bwysig yn monnt gyrraedd y Prif Llefwyr. Ieitha'r morfynol, yn ymddangos i'r Llywodraeth, yn y Llywodraeth, yn y Llywodraeth, ymddangos i'r Llywodraeth. Wrth gŵi'n dweud yma, yn y Llywodraeth, y Llywodraeth yn cael ei fawr. Mae'r ddorol o'r pethau'r unrhyw, yn y Llywodraeth, yn y Llywodraeth, yn y Llywodraeth. Ymddangos i'r Llywodraeth, mae'r ddechrau'r argyfuddio, mae'r ddechrau'r argyfuddio. o'r חayfogol. Ie gael y bydd wedi gyfreunio'r Llywodraeth yn gwybod y bydd y llyfr yn y Llywodraeth. Roedd oes o oes o'r hynny, hynny oherwydd, eich mynd i chi fod a'i gyffredig y ffordd inni. A bod i chi'n mynd i'n ffordd, eich ymhanag oeddwn i fod yn ei wnaeth hwnnw. W Deixa e, Fy hwaf ddoch chi'n gweithio ddechrau? Wythiwr, dŵer i'n i mor hwnr eich ddweud o'r ddechrau, mae'r ddysgu ddweud, mae'n ddysgu, o'r peth o'r ddweud o'n i'n wneud o'i ddweud. Mae'n creiddio, mae'n ymwyno i chi'n gweithio y cemaisio. Oherwydd byddwn ni'n gweithio i chi. Moedd yn gweithio i chi. ..a byddwyd yn ychwanego'r cwrs o'r ffordd. Yn cael ei bod y gallwn i'n rhan o'r ddweud yma... ..y'n rhan o'n rhan o'r ddweud yma, dyma'r ymlaen i'r maen nhw. Mae'n rhan o'n rhan o'r ddweud yn yr ymlaen, rydyn ni'n dweud yma. Rydyn ni'n rhan o'r ddweud yn y Cymraith Gainyswyr. Felly mae'n mynd i ni wedi bod yna'r newydd. Felly, oherwydd... ..y'n dweud sy'n cyntaf fydd yn ymarfer... Denlyniad embosyddio i peu o'r llythig. That's fading hugely And could have attracted players Still a big club People would have looked at us still as a big club And I think I think, if we'd got it, I think we would be a Champions League team now Easily Haven't been one for many years I think I really do believe Because it was just at that time when It hadn't exploded yet Diwaelio yn enw? Felly mae'r brif, mae'r sgol yn y pl нравol fel Adagorau i gyda'rи cynedd. Rhaid i ni'n brofynau lywodau pan yw'r rhannol fel Eilidion. Rhaid i ni'n brofynau i dda, ein bod nhw'n ei fawr? Rydyn ni'n firmy. Fyltaethau dim yn yr emyru? Sa cyntaf, yn 2006. Felly mae'n rhannol cyntaf i brif. Rydyn ni'n Rhannol gyntaf i brif, ma' ni ffrwng cael ei yn ei ffyrdd. Fyllfa arno i arna. Mae'r ffactor i ni ddim yn ei ddim yn eich bodwn yn 40,000 o 55,000. Rwy'n ddod y bwysig. Rwy'n ddod o wlad yn ymdill Dw'r newydd. Mae'r ddau yma nad yw, mae'r ddau eich bodwn yn ddigad i'r ddau, mae'r ddau'r ddau yn ddigad i'r ddau, mae'r ddau'n ddigad i'r ddau. Y rhaed, gallai hefyd wedi bodwn yn ymdill, mae'r ddau'n ddigad i'r ddau. Mae'r ddau eich bodwn yn ddigad i'r ddau, I would have put us on live a lot more, it would have just been all of that kick if this is a club going places, everything that comes with that. Greg would have stayed on the board. Paul, Greg had been there trying to get market hearing and all that media. I think like, you know, like Peds said, they like to see Mansour. People like that wanting to get involved would have been evident in the go-to. Big club, banks of the Royal Blue Maisie, City Centre, bigger stadium than Liverpool, Blardy, Blardy, Blar, whatever, however you want to do it. And if it would have played out the way it was, David Moyes was our manager, at that time I was working there and the King's Doc was still a thing. So Moyes, coming as the manager, young, energetic David Moyes put my kind of team together in that stadium on the banks of the Royal Blue Maisie, 55,000. With the players you're getting playing the football we were getting, it would have just gone... Double the match day income. Everton would have been in for me, he would have had some money then to be able to buy players. Eddyn Hazard and Eddyn Jekyll, we would have had lined off at 20 million, would have been here. We didn't have 20 million, couldn't get the both of them. They changed everton again and you're looking at something that would have, Everton would have played Champions League football on quite a few occasions if we'd have got that. And what history has shown us is that once you get into the Champions League like that you move further away, so you stay in it. April 2003 was when we were told it wasn't happening.  Five, six maybe. Yeah, 2007, 2008 it would have sucked. It would have been around the same time Chelsea and Manchester City started, but it would have kept us right up there. Right up there, at the right time, with something to look forward to. I truly believe, me personally, is that everything comes from that. Because everything from that is just trying to, it's just trying to keep your head above water from then on. So that is, there was a moment in 2004, five seasons, so it was early on. It was after, to be honest, it was after the Covent Samuels and things, it was, you know, Paul Greg questioned it didn't he? And at the time people were like, no, no, Bill Kenneight still has said this is happening. But there was a flip of a coin where the Greg was given the vote to stay or whether it was Kenneight. People have wanted something. And without backing Bill out too much, I just wonder if Paul Greg would have stayed and Bill would have gone. Which is why Bill Kenneight was under real pressure, don't forget. I just wonder how better we did. No, I'm with you on that. I liked it the whole full version where, because the stadium happens, both of them today, and maybe they fall out further down the track, who knows. But yeah, I mean Greg was obviously far more creative and therefore risk-taking than Bill could ever be. And therefore we'd have been probably with him around. We were under the vanguard of media, social media, you know, brand stretching the whole nine yards. So if the one got bit, then it's left because he built it. Yeah, so we can all dream. But I'm with PED, I think it's the biggest and most, it's the biggest indictment that the club leadership happened 20 odd years ago when that board screwed up that stadium. There's been, in my lifetime, two hugely damaging events that have stopped ever and gone way into each other. One of our own making and the other one of our own making. And the other one was that moment. It's just a timeline. So submission of the initial bids to develop King's Dock, 6th of October 2000, publication of Everton's Plans, 20th of October 2000, fam vote in favour, 18th of November 2000, submission of detailed proposals of second outbidding, 2nd of January 2001, post-pollments of sections to allow full due diligence 4th of May 2001, selection of preferred bidder by Liverpool Vision 18th of June 2001, preferred bidder ratified by boards of English partnerships, 2nd of July 2001, official adoption of preferred bidder when he said July 2001, verification by the Department of Transport, Land Generation and Regions 2nd of August 2001, establishments of the King's Dock. Just a little now quickly that's happening compared to Bramleymore. Company 12th of September 2001, appointments of Bovis Lend Lease as Construction Managers 30 December 2001, Securing the support of local and regional councils, January, February 2002, securing the available grants, sponsorships and other finances, that's where the project's thought. It's 90% in the bag.  You only have to speak to John Grantchester and he'd just pull it out your back pocket. You do it and we'll give it back. So the next, just guarantee it for us. The next couple of things would have been securing agreements, development partners, hotel shopping residents, submission of planning applications to the Liverpool City Council. That would have been the next thing. Then basically the next one after that was just like we're going to build it. Building it. And to me, to me. So it would have been done a lot, sorry, us in it, way before you said it would be five, six surely. It was, we were told that was where we went, we went down to the Albert Doch, we were given a presentation. Pointing where it was going to be. The reason it dragged on to April 2003 was Everton just continually trying to prove we had the money. But to me, bill had only one plan and it was to build the stadium and it went from that to Kirby. And then to Kirby to Walton. Now I know what I'm saying. That's what I'm saying. But the plan was the only plan he ever had to make Everton a bigger and better club was building a stadium and that's the only thing he ever had. To me that's why it is the biggest missed opportunity. Totally. And it's why we are where we are because there was no other plan on the table to make Everton able to compete with anyone else. There wasn't any redevelopment of Goodersham Park, even though people had come out with all kinds of ambitious plans for redevelopment of Goodersham Park. But just where did they? We didn't own half the land of Goodersham Park. The dysfunction of having a plan to redevelop the back of the park and the retail and all that sort of stuff. And then the landlord goes there, no. You don't own that land? Well you mean, you guys, you went that far not knowing it. You asked them first. And having spoken to Robert Elston about that, he, and it was one to one thing, he was so vitriolic about the behaviour of the landlord, the insurance company. But you clear that beforehand? Before you put out shiny plans and get people excited.


Hi everyone, Sean with jaspyscasebreaks.com here to do a 2021 hit parade football VIP series five box six box case Or series five hobby six box case break random team number one Where we're looking for ridiculous stuff like these especially Tom Brady potential rookie autos Aaron Rogers Josh Allen rookie Otto Russell Wilson so on and so forth. So they make See 32 spots where we get to random team NFL new draft picks of their teams will go to their current team example Trevor Lawrence goes to the Jags everybody else as well Each box contains one sensational card either protected by one touch or graded slab from PSA or Beckett What's included low numbered autographs dual triple and booklet autographs one of ones PSA and Beckett graded autographs and PSA and Beckett graded rookies only 50 hand numbered boxes are produced and they take 36 of them They put them into six box cases. So there's only six cases made the other 14 outside of those 36 are sold separately individually Typically with cases I have not seen one yet where we haven't seen a sales sheet hit so we should see something pretty big like this Here are the list of customers from David Razer down to Chris Maxwell and the teams from the Cardinals down to the Washington football team dice will randomize both lists and pair them up a one and a six seven times Seventh and final time from David Razer down to leave Wolfgrim and Seven times on the teams Seventh and final time and guys remember with the stuff like the Anything that's not like like it said with the Trevor Lawrence and stuff like that if it's a college jersey or a non-pro jersey on the card It will go to the team that that team player currently plays on if it's a retired player It'll go to the team that they played for the longest so on and so forth Seven times on the teams seven times on the customers and seven times on the dice So for example that Brady that would go to the Buccaneers So David Razer for the 49ers unless it says New England on the card Dayton Rogers for the Bears Donnie Killian for the Patriots Robert Flores for the Rams Jared Spielman with the Seahawks Donnie Killian with the Buccaneers Jeffrey Dorlak with the Vils David Razer with the Chiefs Jonathan Griffin with the Steelers Donnie Killian with the Jaguars Chris Maxwell with the Jets Donnie Killian with the Raiders Chris Maxwell with the Giants Jonathan Leang with the Ravens Chris Maxwell with the Cardinals Riley Zimmer with the Dolphins Trevor Tamuro with the Broncos Alexander Pirano with the Panthers Donnie Killian with the Titans David Razer with the Texans Gail Ablo with the Browns Donnie Killian with the Vikings Corey Shalik with the Eagles Christian Woodland with the Falcons Corey Shalik with the Saints Michael Hughes with the Washington football team and Gail Ablo with the Chargers Shum Sonnenblick with the Packers David Razer with the Bangles Dick Cobo with the Cowboys Adam Levy with the Colts and Lee Wolfgrim with the Lions Trade window is open be careful guys. There is no checklist with the product like this So just be aware of that when you are making trades There is the full list So I'll give it about a minute so for trades if any if it's an active trade window Then we'll pause the video and keep it going. I saw that too Adam. He did look very happy. I was excited Lee has the Lions up for trade Yeah, they're they're not the longest at all But speed we've got Anybody else looking to trade like I said Lee has the Lions up for trade Lee I'll give it another 15 seconds or so if nobody else is here Participating the trade window then we'll just print rip trade window going once trade window going twice trade going three times trade window closed so let's print rip and Here is our case See hip parade VIP Football series five. This is case number six of six and you'll see every single box in here is everything is individually boxed in here packaging is exceptional to get from them to us and back to you in Very nice condition all of our cards are riding in luxury in these those are our six boxes There is our finalist Good luck everyone So first up first up we're doing box 33 of 50 Empty box This one feels like an encased card One box one sale she hit Josh Allen raided rookie Blue that is 48 out of 75 Very nice Buffalo Bills Jeffrey Dorlak with the spot he won In a mosaic filler pack. That's a beautiful card Box number 29. I mean other than our own Adam obviously Yeah, that's why we that's why we like them next up Justin Jefferson Wow rookie tie-dye auto from select that's out of 25 Two out of 25 for the Minnesota Vikings and Donnie Killian one of his last spot mojo spots There you go Donnie to Number two in rookie of the year voting spot our box 47 up next This one is a Beckett graded card and That's a good one to Jordan love encased autograph two out of 50 Little Jay Hart Green Bay Packers Shum Sonnenblatt 10 on the auto 9 5 on the grade straight out of Padini encased This is a crazy case first three box first three cards Nice box number four This one is Number seven seven out of 50 Elway seven We got a dual auto And it's a gold vinyl Saquon Barkley and unfortunately Darius guys on the bottom rookie dual auto That's a one-of-one Saquon Barkley auto, so that is a randomizer New York Giants is Chris Maxwell Washington football team is Michael Hughes So that is going to be a randomizer between the Washington and New York We don't like Derek guys so much around these these these parts Box 22 It feels like an encased. Oh, it's really thick. It's a booklet Whoa, I Keep it going. This case is Loaded rookie Jumbo booklet auto Three color patch and auto Kyler Murray for the Cardinals and Chris Maxwell. There you go, Chris national treasures Rookie Jumbo booklet that is 81 out of 99 What can we finish them? What can we wrap up on Pat box number 19? Absolutely man, congratulations. Thanks for getting in you know, it's funny Chris. That's your spot that you won in the filler also They got you that Kyler Wow, we're gonna finish off on an NFL shield Josh Jacobs rising rookie NFL shield auto out of Phoenix One of one this was a crazy case Raiders Donnie Killian with another one of his last spot mojo spots to one of ones and out of 25 What a six boxes now The unfortunate part the randomizer This is gonna be between the Giants and Washington Let's pop over here. Let me reset this reset that so Giants New Dice roll team on top after a four and one five times one two three four and fifth and final time It's gonna go to Washington and Michael Hughes. We might not like Derek guys, but Darius guys, but it just got you this dual auto Darius guys say one Barclay gold vinyl one of one So there you go, Michael Congratulations and see five times Washington on top Five times on the dice and there you go. That was 2021 hit parade football VIP series five hobby box six case six box case Break random team number one from Jasper's case breaks calm. I'm Sean Jasper's case breaks calm Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you next time


My road to join the Air Force was actually a pretty long time because I was working multiple jobs as a civilian And I just wasn't feeling like I was in the responsibility that I deserved about a year after being out of high school I went to a career and I spoke to him We got the ball rolling that way just because I didn't feel like there was a clear path of a career Where I was before and in the military. It's like very like structure. It's structured like you can see Exactly where you're gonna be in a few months years, etc. I wanted a career career progression Well that and like finances like not necessarily that I wasn't doing well, but because With the military I can structure out like I was telling you like when we hung out the other day that With the TSP and like all that stuff like I can set it up so that way I can retire Finances are yeah, it's so much structure. Yeah So I've been in for two years. I'm an A1C E3 and I'm loving it so far how much longer until you put on senior man March 2020 almost another year from now. Yeah I'm aerospace ground equipment or we just like to call age for short and the AFSC is to alpha 6x2. I signed an open mechanical and They were trying to push me to do four years But I knew me as a person I would want to do six years because I knew that there's gonna be parts of any job That you work for even civilian wise that you're gonna hate and or dislike And so I've realized that for me if I were to do six years It would force me to kind of go along and see what yeah commit it and see what it's like So yeah, I did six years open mechanical and then as I was signing my contract.   I get all this money I mean it didn't end up being that didn't end up being a lot of money, but like it was still something yeah It was like $1,800. Yeah got me home for a for a visit with my family, so I Don't remember everything. Where was age then on that one? I'm pretty sure was last those last pretty sure was last Yeah, I was like cuz I remember getting called into the TI's office And he's like congratulations. You got aerospace ground up and then I was like Yeah, I was like oh it's like I think that's like then I'm looking back I'm like I'm pretty sure that's why I put it in there But um I had ammo I had a bunch of crew chiefs jobs, which I'm glad I didn't get Because being age you know we have a rivalry with with crew chiefs as I'm sure you know But it's all I love but Like so it was all crew chief jobs for like f-16s and stuff like that But the cool thing about my job is that like I'm not limited to an airframe. Yeah, I can go to any base Yeah, cuz crew chiefs get shredded out. Yeah, like even people that I worked with over in Beale they're coded to the U2 and The 810 mm-hmm because apparently like I didn't even know they only get to go to like five bases Yeah, there's like Korea some places, you know overseas and Beale. Yeah, like that's it So tech school was at Shepherd in Wichita Falls, Texas So tech school was like about five months. I believe it or so, you know It's been a while since I've been in but it was five to six months So it was right on the cusp of like I know you and I'm sure you know that you got BTP and then like you got ATP With age we were right on the cusp of like being up being able to move out of the dorms like the regular dorms for For training and go into the ATP dorms where like we can don't have to do Formation we can drive a car to to class and stuff like that We were there like we we missed about a month or something like that from what I was told Yeah, that kind of sucked, but I mean at the same time you're only there for a few months Yeah, yeah, it would have been pretty cool, but you know I Enjoyed it. I did feel like it wasn't as in depth as it needed to be But I mean Well, yeah, and you kind of need that to be like that because not everybody's gonna have a mechanical background I mean, I didn't really have a mechanical background either. Yeah, so like I mean, I did a lot of Autodesk Inventor stuff I don't know if you know what that is. So it's like 3d printing 3d modeling and designing on the computer So I am actually certified in Autodesk Inventor, which is a program for that For the Air Force and so like that kind of stuff helps you think in a certain way So I was very I'm a very very visual learner seeing everything on on the board Touching the equipment looking at all the wiring that really helped me and I did pretty well in Tex school I I think the only block or class that I struggled in was hydraulics Like I you need like a 70 to pass I got a 70 on hydraulic but everything else was like 80s 90s hundreds 80s 90s hundreds and then 70 and I was like So what's so difficult about hybrids? Well, it was a combination of like the the teacher that was doing it didn't really link up with my Learning style. It was kind of just like oh read off the board and for me I need somebody to say it and I just see it or so yeah And then it locks in my brain forever But like it was a combination of that and like it was getting towards the end. I was getting burnt out I was tired. Yeah Yeah, I was like, I don't want to do this anymore. I was like, well, I'm gonna pass. I'm just ready to get to my base Yeah, yeah, exactly. I'm fine. I'm ready to find out what my base is. Yeah, and Because I still don't think I knew at that point. We found out like two weeks before. Yeah, it depends in tech school Some people will find out like right away and other classes will find out.  I looked it up.  Like why would you lie to me? Oh, yeah, they do that. They would tell us like well one of you guys are OSI and we'd be like, oh my god We always used to think that's a basic training in tech school. Yeah, so put it here as OSI We used to think there was like microphones hidden in the AC events in the dorms. Yeah, there's nothing I spoke to you an OSI agent at one point not from me or anything like that But it was like a mass briefing like for a generated deploy He's like, you know, I'm sure you heard about, you know us doing this this and this Basic training in tech school is that we don't do that. I'm like, yeah, isn't that something somebody would say? Like it's just like people are paranoid. Yeah, exactly as long as you do the right thing you're gonna be fine Yeah, I mean, that's that's what I try to do. Yeah integrity first.  Cuz I've heard some people hate it some people love it and it's like it's like any PCS You know, it is what you make of it. Mm-hmm Shepherd was really small at least what we were allowed to like see yeah and everything like that It wasn't a bad experience Because like you have the mall you had this one place that we used to go all the time It was a Hibachi place. I can't remember the name. Yeah, so like every weekend Yeah, we go there and like I wasn't 21 yet So I couldn't drink or anything like I would always you know DD for everybody or we take like the van shuttle You start getting paid to DD people. No Yeah, you guys are dry people around all the time because if you didn't have a DD you'd have higher tax So some people like 15 bucks. I'll take all you guys.  Well, I didn't have a car in tech school So like I was using like their cars and like this one girl She had a car that her you know dad brought down and we'd always go out like our whole class And we brought to eat and stuff like that like I was like, well, I'm not 21 I'm like one of the only people who's not so I'll just do it I've been DDing for for two years in the military and now that I turn 21.  Yeah, it was a good experience.  It's not really anything different, you know Yeah, it's actually one person in tech school one and it was like it was a good experience It was nice. I'm like, I don't know that as soon as I got to tech school I got to my my dorm and I instantly started talking to my girlfriend at the time who's not my wife But we're just like I was just like, oh my god now. I can talk to you all the time Yeah, and then you know, they're like well no phones in class and I was like man. Yeah, you know, that's pretty standard Yeah, cuz my job my job is the same way tech school Yeah, so everybody just pretty much after school is when you would talk to somebody Yep, I mean we had a we had in our sister class. We had a cross trainer from avionics I guess with the AWACS who's a senior airman and it was like he's got he gets to have his phone in here because you know He's prior sir. Yeah, and I'm like man. I must be really nice like the train Yeah, that must be really nice to cross train and then my supervisor now is actually a Cross train from avionics to age. I don't know where he was before but he's a hard worker You know he works, you know, it works a lot of people in our shop As far as I know, I mean, I don't I know there's a lot of you know bases around you only know what you've experienced Yeah, yeah, so like you can go pretty much anywhere. There's aircraft there If there's aircraft there for sure unless I don't think we can come to Nellis cuz it's contracted No, the rescue unit is not though. Okay, so they do have a small age. Okay. I didn't know that same with my job My job's contracted on all the fighters even but the helicopters we still run. Okay There's only like 12 people in the age shop. Okay. Yeah, because like at Beale metals tech is contracted completely But we just now started getting Military yeah working there. So it's it's yeah as long as there's active-duty Components or slots available at the base we can go there. Okay, so you pretty much Yeah, free to go anywhere So if you want to want the opportunity maybe go somewhere or not Well, if you would run a crew cheat you would have been limited to like five bases Whatever that airframe is stationed at and what a lot of people do is they'll put in orders for Korea and then they'll Have a follow-on to where they want to go. Mm-hmm, especially if they're still considered a first-term airman Yeah, you have a chance of going to a base you might yeah, exactly sacrifice one here in Korea Are you thinking about doing that? Well, I'm thinking about it But since I'm married I take my wife it have to be three years. Yeah, so I asked my wife was okay Would you go with me to Korea and she's like Sure, I was like all right cool bet Happens exactly. I mean with a rate that people are disappearing from our shop. I mean yeah, yeah, it'll happen The best way I describe it to civilians is weird diesel mechanics And so like we work on big generators that put out a lot of AC power and some that put out DC power because they are different power sources the Dash-60 basically what those things do is they provide bleed air to the aircraft. We on an average day We're gonna like we're gonna do inspections on the on the equipment So phase one inspection inspections phase two inspections and those are just basically oil You know checking to make sure the gas isn't or the diesel isn't contaminated you know checking belts and Electronic opponents all that kind of stuff You're just basically making sure that there's nothing out of the ordinary and each a piece of equipment is gonna have like Special requirements like with for the 86 for example, which is just a big generator that we use That's very common for every aircraft plug it into the aircraft You have to make sure that the bolts on the generator are torqued down correctly It's like that's like a specific thing that we would do so I'd be including your yeah And it's in the inspection. I guess yeah, but anything that we would have in our shop is gonna be specifically for supporting Aircraft in their sorties, which is you know, they're flying times on an average day We're gonna do the inspections for that for that support equipment and then you're also gonna have an age driver that is soul or he or she's sole purpose on the flight line is to get a call deliver age get a call deliver age and You're like growth hub. Yeah, we're like we're like Uber Eats for the flight line But you're not delivering food. Yeah, it's like he's like hey, man We need we need a juicy locks car right here. I'm like, all right 15 Mike But yeah, so we will pick up equipment whatever they need to support that aircraft whether it's recovery or launch Because recovery you need equipment doesn't matter what you're doing with an aircraft You're gonna need age. So you're kind of SOL if you don't have age. Yeah, I'd say it's a thing That's a thankless job. So sometimes so yeah, like the the common things that you can get put into an age are You can either drive the line and normally at least that beel will do it for about a month at a time Depending on what if you're a day shifter or night shift So you got you know the dispatcher which is just driving to and from the flight line bring in equipment And then you have spuds which is basically your sole purpose is to Bring equipment that needs to be thick and we bring it to sheet metal or Whichever one is gonna be able to fix that that piece of equipment and normally Generators to us that had bolts that were broken out Rivets would be like loosen a little drill and we'd have to reshoot Yeah, so you'll do spuds which is I don't know I'm sure it's very different between like every base book the base that I'm at will have spuds And we have an inspections lead which you have to get a certain amount of inspections done So you could be put in inspections or you could be put in maintenance where you're basically just sitting there and you'll fix Whatever major thing happens You troubleshoot your troubleshooting your figure out what's wrong with stuff. You're fixing this stuff You're ordering parts. You're putting parts in a lot of times Is it just like one or two parts that go bad like a like a switch or something that breaks? It's it's it's usually very minimal. I know when I first came in I was like, oh the generator is bad I it's got to be and my seven levels like no You should you should keep troubleshoot because you already knew it was wrong. Yeah, and that's how I was like We're not buying a new generator. Yeah, that's how I got good $100 part and you were like, I wanted to replace the whole thing. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, instead of like, you know $50,000, but then it's almost like working on a car like when your car stops working You're not like the whole motor is bad. Yeah, you got it.  Yeah, like replace O2 sensor. Yeah. Oh, it works now And then you can also have support inside the the age shop. So support is basically gonna be hey, you know I need it's like a tools crib. Yeah Yeah, you need a they just are in charge of the tools and like usually they're in charge of the programs of the Shop like I know I just got put on fall prevention And so I got to make that from scratch because I I've never I've never made a program before But it's gonna be a first time. But yeah, so like they'll do a lot of programs like has and stuff like that Step one don't fall. Yeah Step one don't fall, but you have to have like a whole pro like a whole book. Yeah binder on fall prevention Yeah, exactly. So you got to create a whole binder now. Yeah Well, I mean luckily it's with my supervisor. So he's gonna he's gonna show me how to do it So I know in the future. Yeah, so that's what he's good Get your license get your license before you join before you join get your license You know, no one's gonna fault you for fault you for living in an area where you you know Like New York where you're not gonna have your license normally But if you get in and you don't have your license Make the effort to try to get your license as soon as you can because it just puts more work on your Co-workers to have to bring you to and from work and like that's not that big of a deal But the fact that you can't drive the flight line That's like 50% of your job is driving the line So if you can't do 50% of your job, you're gonna have a bad time. Yeah, you're like, I know I knew somebody who didn't get her license for a while and she was put on 12. Yeah Like a month and a half or something like that. So she got it and you're impeding the shop at that point Exactly not and so they they will put you on a mandatory duty to make sure that you get yourself them Because that's a requirement is yeah have a license. Well, that's the the weird thing is that it's not a requirement for age You can get an age without having a license or if it's a requirement once for the yeah Which is like I think that's wild to me like why we wouldn't say hey 50% of this job is is you need a license So so we should know this job.  It's not that big of a deal But on top of making sure you have your license I would say make sure you're willing to learn with any job that you get in the military You just need to make sure that you want to learn because if you're not gonna like put in the effort to learn your job You're not gonna promote. You're not gonna do, you're not gonna go on the cool TDY's like I didn't work hard I would not be on this TDY here. Yeah, you know and so just work hard Even if you don't know what you're doing just best foot forward, you know, and you're gonna you're gonna have a good time All right guys, that was my interview with Austin. I appreciate you for one Coming here to thank your base for sending you TDY here. So you were able to do this interview It's isn't this crazy what what it looks like from somebody that's in to somebody that's not It looks so funny when I'm next to somebody else like in regs and then like me. I was like, I I looked like this Seven months ago. That's that's crazy. I mean and like the thing is before I joined I didn't have like a crazy beer anything but like I had a nice goatee going on and I miss it so much Yeah, that's what I never had this yeah, but now I do. I'm jealous. I'm gonna definitely have to do that when I get out Yeah, most people do But I actually had longer hair in middle school I grow it out. I grew it out to like right here That's my goal. That's what I'm trying to get to it's a lot of work though. Yeah, you learn how to do the whole like tell Yeah, I'm like once I get there. I'll probably like alright. I'm getting rid of it now So you just wanna grow out once but yeah, thanks for coming here and talking you were super comfortable on camera Which is really cool because a lot of people are kind of nervous But you seem really comfortable you guys should comment down below anything that you learned about this anything that you liked Or if you have any questions comments or concerns about this Comment them down below because there might be other age people that watch this video too And they can kind of help out in the chat Let you know the the real things or whatever that you're seeking answers for that we maybe didn't I definitely don't know You know, I've only been in for two years, so I got a lot to learn. Yeah, and it's always a learning process Nobody knows it all so and every base is gonna be different Alright guys, that was everything for the video be sure to leave a comment down below click like and subscribe And I'll see you guys in my next video. Peace out


Hello and welcome to the session. In this session we discussed the following question that says what number must be added to each of the numbers 9, 5, 12, 7 to get the numbers which are in proportion. We know that if A is to B is proportional to C is to D then the product of extremes that is A into D is equal to the product of the means that is B into C. This is the key idea for this question. Let's move on to the solution now. We take let the required number be equal to X that is we add X to each of the numbers 9, 5, 12 and 7 such that they are in proportion. So we have 9 plus X is to 5 plus X is proportional to 12 plus X is to 7 plus X. Now that these numbers are in proportion so product of extremes that is 9 plus X multiplied by 7 plus X is equal to the product of X which is 5 plus X into 12 plus X.  Now X square, X square cancels on both the sides. We get 17 X minus 16 X is equal to 63 minus 60 which gives us X is equal to 3. So we have 3 must be added to each of the numbers 9, 5, 12 and 7 to get the numbers which are in proportion. Thus 3 is our final answer. This completes the session. Hope you have understood the solutions for this question.


to the channel. If you haven't yet, make sure you subscribe to stay up to date with all the latest content that we put out. So today I want to talk about what to focus on in your client evaluation sessions. So something I get asked on a regular basis is Leo, how do I set up, taste the sessions? How do I set up evaluation sessions? What should I be focusing on? And what do I need in order to make my evaluation sessions a success? So what I want to do today is I want to share with you four things that I focus on when I run evaluation sessions with the clients I work with. And, you know, this video is for you if you want to take these ideas and run with it. Or if you want to implement your own type of system that you can onboard clients and essentially know what to focus on when a new player or a new client comes into your program. And you need to provide them with feedback. So to give you a breakdown, the way we teach coaches in our program to set up evaluation sessions is very simple. So the first bit is you need to have a landing page where the parent essentially, when they land on your company. So this could be a Facebook page. This could be a website. Parents need somewhere where they can consume some information of yours and they can then register onto an evaluation session in your program. So the first bit is parents have landed on your Facebook page or your website. They've clicked a link and that takes them onto a landing page. And on that landing page is where they register for an evaluation session. What we then do is we teach our coaches to then follow up with that client or that prospect that has registered onto that evaluation session by Eva setting up a Zoom call or setting up a call with them where they give them a ring, introduce themselves as the coach and explain a little bit about what's going to be included in the evaluation session and what the program essentially is about. If you set your business up that way, not only do you separate yourself from everyone else, but it shows professionalism above and beyond what any other trainer in your local area is doing. So once you've gotten that call, you've spoken to the parent, they're happy to attend your eval session. Once they get to your session, the four things I'm going to share with you, the four things that I focus on when I do these taste start or evaluation sessions with new clients. So I focus on four different areas. So the first one is technical. So when the client comes in, we will go through a normal session, whether it be a one-on-one session or whether it be a group session. And what I essentially do is I focus on the technical aspect of the player. So the technical side is how is their dribbling? How good is their passing? How good are they receiving with different parts of the foot or different parts of the body? How confident are they with receiving and playing quickly? What is their shooting technique like? So all the technical aspects of soccer, this is what I focus on in the technical phase of my evaluation session. Now the next bit is the physical. So physical movements. How quick are they? How quickly do they respond? So physical movements, strength in 1v1 situations. How strong are they when they're up against another player? Now if you're doing one-on-one sessions in order to focus on the strength side of it, you can focus on what about when they jump to hit the ball? What's their power like? How quick are they running? And also the power and strength of their shooting or their technique. So when it comes to passing or shooting, what you can focus on on the strength side if it's a one-on-one session is what's their strength like when they pass the ball? What's their strength like when they shoot? So how much power do they have in their physical movements when they receive, when they pass, when they dribble when they shoot? Speed, change of direction, very simple. What's their agility like as a player? Are they quick to change speeds? Do they always stay in the same speed? Are they good at changing direction? Receiving with their back to goal? Receiving forwards? Receiving sidewards? Receiving under pressure? So what are their attributes when it comes to change of speed, change of direction and their physical movements? The next bit is the social aspect. So engagement with a group. Now if you don't have that client in groups and you have it one by one, what's the engagement with the coach? Are they asking questions? Are they listening? Are they in another planet when you're speaking to them? The next bit is listening skills. So how good is their listening and implementation? So do you have to tell them once? Do you have to tell them twice? Do you have to tell them three times in order to do a specific session or an activity? And also their behavior. Are they messing around or are they fully focused during that evaluation session? Now the psychological side is ultimately the mental side and this is their levels of concentration. So how concentrated are they? How's their communication when they speak to the coach? When they speak to other teammates on the program? What's their level of confidence? Are they shy? Are they introvert? Are they out? Extrovert? Do they speak a lot? Do they hide? So these are the four areas that I focus on when I do an evaluation session with new players. And then the next bit, once we've done that evaluation session, what I do then is I send feedback to the parent. So this might be the day after, so 24 hours after we've done the session, that parent will essentially receive feedback on what their child did during that session. So they'll get some feedback on the technical, the physical, the social, the psychological. So I'll give them four things on these four things, which are positives. And then I'll give them always one area of improvement. I don't want to give them too many areas of improvement. I like to focus on just one specific thing.  And if they work with Leo, they'll be able to get better at that specific area of improvement. And after that, okay, part of the part of the email. So we've got all the feedback and then below it's the offer to join the program. And the next steps that that parent has to take in order to get their child registered onto our program. Okay. And this is essentially what I do with all the clients that I work with. This is what I help coaches on. So it's a very simple process, landing page somewhere where parents can register onto your evaluation session, follow up call with that parent once they've registered to talk about the program, to talk about what the taste decisions going to be about. And then next bit, once that session's done 24 hours later, we send them feedback to their email. Okay. We've also an offer to join our program. And then the next steps on how to get registered before the next upcoming session. Okay. So if you need any help with this, visit the description in this video, you'll be able to get in contact with me. You can either book a free 15 to 20 minute call where we jump on zoom. I can learn more about your business. I can answer some questions. Or if you have any separate questions for me, you can either WhatsApp me at my number below or send me an email to makemoneycoachingsportsatgmail.com. Okay. Thank you for watching and make sure before you go, you subscribe to the channel. Those stay stuck with your business. We're putting out content every 48 hours to help you and your business to get to the next level.


It seemed like you're just having fun out there. How was asking Aaron Boone what has helped you allow to have a seamless transition? And he was just saying that your makeup has really played a big role. Yeah, I mean, the guys have been really nice and really welcome me. Very easy to talk to, especially when it comes to baseball. All the baseball talk in the dugout has been really amazing. The pre-game, hitters meetings and whatnot. So, but just coming in, my old hitting coach, Anthony, I posted his daughter, her message to us hitters this year was just do what you do. And that's all I've been saying to myself, just do what you do.  That's what I'm trying to do right now. What do you think the reception is gonna be for you in your first game at Yankee Stadium as a Yankee? I just look forward to it. I look forward to putting on the pinstripes and stepping out on the field and playing. I look forward to seeing Brandon Hyde tomorrow, the manager of the Orals. Him and I have had a long history together, really close to his little son. So, seeing him grow up. So, just excited to get to New York and play in front of the fans. Bingo, next, Meredith. Anthony, you came to the plate in the eighth and a big spot there. Runners on first and third with one out, with Liar on the mound. What's the approach against a guy who could be tough on left-handers? Yeah, he's, he definitely gets a lot of left-handers to hit the ball on the ground. So, trying to shoot him. Let him get the deepest spot. Not growing, get him in the air with how much safety he has on the ball. So, just trying to take this point and not try to do too much on the line. You had a nice defensive play then in the bottom of the inning. Just how much pride do you take in that aspect of your game? Yeah, that's, that's, it wins, it wins games. Defenses, especially when you get to the playoffs, it's deep pitching and defense and timely hitting, but you got to make all the plays. I know, I know we missed the pop-up and this communication there and that type of stuff you taught me for sure, but you can make the plays that you're supposed to make. That's a big deal. Meredith, do you have a follow-up? No? Bingo, next, Randy Miller. Yeah, I'm wondering, for tomorrow night's game, if you ever go to Yankee Stadium and sit in the bleachers, I wonder what your thought of the roll call out there? You have anything special planned for them? I know you had a great relationship with the Cubs fans and I'm anticipating that you plan to do the same with the Yankee fans. Just trying to get ingrained in the culture at Yankee Stadium. For the time that the bleachers as a kid, we were always in the stands, so, but just excited to go there and feel that atmosphere and feel that energy and that definitely helps coming off the sweep this weekend and energy in here has been very high.


Hello everyone, thank you for listening to this talk about breaking the circuit-sized barrier on the quasi-pollinomial LPN. As this is joined to work with Joffre Coutot, and the way I like to present our results is to say that we show how to achieve sublinear computation from LPN by using a tool known as homomorphic secret sharing. Now I'll get into what HSS is in a moment, but for now let's just have a look at our main result. Our main result is that under a reasonable flavor of LPN, there is a two-party protocol for securely computing any circuit which uses an amount of communication which is only sublinear in the circuit size. Now more precisely, and ignoring the assumption for now, if all you require is very slightly sublinear communication, for instance S over log star of S, then the amount of computation required is nearly linear. But you may wonder how far can we push the factor of sublinearity using our techniques. It so happens communication can be as low as S over log log S in which case computation becomes cubic. For the rest of this talk, I'll be explaining how our protocol works. But in order to do that, I'll have to start by introducing a few objects. But once that's done, we can go over step by step how our protocol works. I should start by mentioning that our protocol is of course not the first one to achieve sublinear two-party computation. This was known both in the correlated randomness model and from a variety of computational assumptions. So our contribution, as it were, is to add LPN to this list. As a matter of fact, our techniques are very much derived from two lines of work. So the first is the HSS line of work and the second is CUTO 19 in the correlated randomness model. But what is the LPN assumption? I'm sure most of you are familiar with this formulation of the learning parity with noise assumption. So it's parameterized by three values. So the dimensions of matrix A as well as the density of the noise vector or noise or error. But for our purposes, it's more convenient to consider the dual form of LPN, which is essentially equivalent. So here goes. I can always give you, instead of the matrix, its parity check matrix. That's roughly equivalent. And let's look at what happens the second term. If we multiply it by the parity check matrix, since H and A cancel out, all you're left with is H times E. So this is the dual LPN assumption. Essentially, if you wish to generate a pseudo random vector, all you need to do is to multiply a public contracting matrix by some sparse noise vector. And the parameters are still there as the dimension of parity check matrix H as well as the density of the noise. And let's look at the values of the parameters for our specific flavor of assumption, which is the quasi polynomial LPN assumption or super polynomial, if you will. Roughly, it's just that we assume that the adversary is allowed to run in a slightly super polynomial time. So the best known attack is exponential. So I'll leave you to judge whether the gap between the best known attack and the level of security will require is large enough to justify this assumption. The reason why we use the LPN assumption is that it enables us to instantiate two key primitives around which our protocol is built. The first is a pseudo random correlation generator or PCG. So the way it works is that there is a target correlation and we wish to be able to generate a pair of very compact seeds that's very important that the seeds be compact. That can be each expanded in such a way that if you take the distribution of expanded seeds, that should be computationally indistinguishable from the target correlation. Here, we'll only be interested in a PCG for a very specific correlation. What we want is to be able to generate seeds which expand to additive shares of the first D tensor powers of a pseudo random vector R. The reason why this is interesting is that any degree D polynomial in the elements of R can be obtained via a linear combination of the elements of these D tensor powers. This specific PCG allows us to build our second primitive function secret sharing. So given a function, we want to be able to derive a pair of evaluation keys which can be used to generate additive shares of the evaluation of any point. An important requirement is that the function be kept secret. So more specifically, if you're only given one of the evaluation keys k0 or k1, you shouldn't learn what the function is. So function secret sharing is defined with respect to a function class. And in this case, we're interested in function secret sharing for the class of all depth D circuits. I should briefly mention that function secret sharing is the dual of homomorphic secret sharing, where instead of having a secret function, now we have a secret input. But for the purposes of this talk, we needn't be concerned with HSS, simply mentioning that there exists a dual form. Finally, and just after this, I can present a protocol, we need to talk about circuits. Because our protocol doesn't work for the class of all circuits, but rather for the class of all layered circuits. And the circuit is layered if you can partition the gates into layers such that wires don't cross. Each wire only goes from one layer to the next. There is a generic transformation from circuit to layered circuits, but it incurs a quadratic blow-up in size. So that's why sublinear protocols don't carry over from layered circuits to general circuits. And in this presentation, we'll consider the simplified, and in this presentation, we'll only be considering the simplified case of rectangular layered circuits. So every layer has the same size, which we call the width of the circuit. So the width times the depth is equal to the size of the circuit. I'd just like to emphasize that this simplification is only done because the protocol becomes simpler to explain. But the protocol does work for non-rectagular layered circuits. We now have everything we need in order to understand the protocol. So consider for now a circuit C1 of width w and of depth k. Let's now also assume that there exists a protocol which allows two parties to convert additive shares of x into additive shares of C1 of x, and that this protocol only uses communication roughly proportional to the width. If such a protocol exists, and we consider now another circuit C2, then the parties can reuse the protocol in order to convert the additive shares of C1 of x into additive shares of C2 of C1 of x. And they can do so over and over for any such circuit. So this is how we use the assumption that the circuit is layered. First, you divide the layered circuits into chunks of k consecutive layers, and you apply such a low complexity protocol to each layer. If you do so, you'll obtain a secure computation protocol whose total communication is S, the circuit size, divided by k. So if k can be super constant, we've won and we have the protocol win. Fortunately for us, such a low communication protocol for shallow circuits exists from LPN. The amount of communication is all right. Unfortunately, the computation is too large. As soon as k is super constant, the computation will be super polynomial. In order to understand why that is, we'll have to open up this secure computation protocol for shallow circuits, which actually uses function secret sharing. So for the next few minutes, the talk is going to be very technical. Fortunately, there's only one key idea which needs to be extracted from this. So I'll first go into the details, and then we can just extract the main idea. So consider a shallow circuit C1 of depth k. Recall that the goal of the parties is to convert additive shares of the input X into additive shares of the output of the circuit. So at a high level, the protocol has three steps. The first is to generate the first 2 to the k tensor powers of some random vector we'll call the mask. We call it the mask precisely because we're going to use it in order to mask the input as the second step is for the parties to exchange shares of X plus R1 in order to reconstruct this mask value of the input. The first is a third step is to use what was generated in the first two in order to locally, so without communication, generate shares of the output. So let's see now how this works. The first step can be done by considering a PCG for the correlation we defined much earlier, and run a generic two-party computation protocol in order to distribute the seed generation. Since the seed generation is compact and the seed is very short, even this protocol needn't be sublinear. Just any efficient enough two-party computation will do. Then the parties can just locally run the seed expansion protocol in order to get the shares they need. The next step is simply for each party to take the sum of their share of X and their share of R1 and their share of the input and their share of the mask in order to define the new share of the mask input. The parties can safely exchange these shares in order to reconstruct the mask input. And the third step is I'll explain now. So the way it works is that if you consider the circuit which first removes the mask R1, then applies the circuit C1. So consider this circuit which has the masked hardcoded. It can be expressed as a polynomial whose coefficients are themselves degree 2 to the k polynomials in the elements of the mask. So since shares of the first 2 to the k tensor powers of R1 are enough to get additive shares of each of those polynomials, the parties have all they need in order to locally compute additive shares of C1 of X. Now let's just have a look at the communication complexity. So step one only uses a small amount of communication because the only thing which requires interaction is the distribution of the seed generation but that's time. The second step requires communication proportional to the size of the input i.e. the width of the circuit and this is going to be an important part of the rest of this talk. So I'll remind you of that when it when it when it's relevant. And what's remarkable is that the third step is completely silent. It requires no interaction. If you'd like you could pause the video and observe that what we've done or rather in what we've done is is actually hidden a an instance of a function secret sharing scheme for the function which first removes the masks then applies the circuit C1. But this observation isn't actually central to our protocol design. Now that we've seen how the protocol for computing a shallow chunk of layers works let's try and understand why its computational complexity is of the form w to the 2 to the k. It all has to do with how the PCG works. So as you may have guessed the pseudo random mask is in fact generated using an instance of dual LPN. In other words we have some public contracting matrix which is not as square as it looks here which is multiplied by some secret noise vector. And the fact of linear algebra is that if you take the tensor power of a product this is equal to the product of the tensor powers. Therefore if you wish to compute additive shares of the tensor power of R we can do so by multiplying some public matrix by an additive share of a tensor power of E the noise vector. So what I have stated before is that our PCG is in fact a wrapper around another PCG the one which generates additive shares of the tensor powers of the noise vector. So we don't need to to to have a look at how that that PCG works. All we need to know is that there is some clever way to exploit the fact that the noise vector E is very sparse in order to obtain a very compact seed generation. But now it should be clear why the computational complexity is of the form w to the 2 to the k. It's simply the size of the matrix the public matrix h tends to 2 to the k times. What we just saw is that the computational complexity of this primitive is prohibitively high to directly apply it to a chunk of of layers. Now this can't be the end of it or well I wouldn't be giving this presentation. As a matter of fact we can use an observation made by Couto who faced a similar problem in the correlated randomness model and this observation was that we're dealing with arithmetic circuits where each gate has fan-in at most 2. This combined with the shallow depth of the circuit means that it's highly local. Each output only depends on at most 2 to the k inputs. More generally if you take w prime outputs they can they only depend on at most 2 to the k times w prime inputs. So we can decompose the computation into small blocks this way and each of those blocks is now small enough that applying the previous protocol can be done in polynomial time. Indeed if k and w prime are small enough the computation is 2 to the k times w prime to the 2 to the k which can be polynomial in w. So the question is are we done here? Is all we need to do applies this decomposition into blocks and treats them as independent instances. If the answer were positive the protocol would be very simple but we wouldn't be contributing anything so obviously the answer is no. Now to understand why you have to recall how the protocol worked. Step number two required the parties to reconstruct the masked value of the input. So the communication was equal to the size of the input. So for each block the input has size 2 to the k times w prime so plug that in and you'll see that overall the computation will be too large. At this point you may pause and wonder because well you may be convinced that if you take this particular decomposition the first w prime outputs followed by the next w prime and the next and the next then this decomposition doesn't work. But does this mean that there is no block deep composition which works? Let's express this as a combinatorial problem. The circuit which is adversarily chosen is essentially for our purposes here just a list of subsets of inputs. Each input corresponds to at most 2 to the k inputs and our goal is to find the nicest decomposition which works for us. So what we want to do is instead of just batching double as the outputs arbitrarily we would like to batch them to batch together outputs with the most overlapping inputs in the hopes of finding a decomposition into blocks where each block has a small enough amount number of inputs that if we were to apply the protocol to each of those blocks overall the communication would still be linear in a w. Now unfortunately no such decomposition can exist. To understand why we have to remember that the circuit is adversarily chosen. In other words our protocol has to work for every single circuit or rather for every single circuit even worst case for us we have to be able to come up with a protocol. So in particular if the matching of outputs to inputs is just a random bipartite graph with high probability this is an expander. Being an expander means exactly that we won't be able to find such a small decomposition. So there is no way of simply finding such a decomposition which would allow us to just invoke independent instances of the previous protocol. Well if we can't treat these blocks as independent we'll just have to deal with them all at the same time in a correlated fashion. So since the issue we raised just before was that we couldn't generate too many little masks what about just generating one single mask and whenever we want to compute one of those blocks we'll only consider a submask. So unfortunately this doesn't actually solve the problem of computation so it's very easily we can very easily see why visually. So this is the mask R which covers the entire span of the inputs it has size w. Now let's say we're only interested in a submask R prime of size 2 to the k times w prime. So what we want to do with this vector is compute the first 2 to the k tensor powers of R prime. Unfortunately as you can see H prime has still one of its coordinates which depends on w. So if you actually raised R prime to the 2 to the k tensor power the computation still is still of the form w to the 2 to the k. We've only reduced one of the dimensions of the matrix not both. So perhaps on a more intuitive level the idea is that when we're considering a submask we're still looking at a linear combination of all of the noise vector. So that's why it doesn't really work. It's simply because the observations that we had input locality does not translate over to compactly generated submasks. At this point we've reached the heart of the problem. We need to define a PCG for a new type of correlation namely the following. When the seeds have been expanded we want the parties to get two things. The first are additive shares of a long mask of size w. The second is that for every submask of size 2 to the k times w prime we want the parties to be able to get the first 2 to the k tensor powers of that submask. The only question that remains is whether we can instantiate this new PCG under LPN. The answer is yes and the solution is the following. Instead of generating the random mask directly as public matrix time sparse noise we're going to generate it as the sum of many shorter masks. Now the point is if we're only interested in a given submask r prime it will only depend on a local subset of the shorter masks. Now if each of the shorter masks is generated as a small instance of LPN so some small matrix HI times EI well it so happens that even if you concatenate all of the matrices defining the masks which intersect with that subset the concatenation of all these matrices is still a small matrix. In particular it can be raised to the power 2 which is okay while remaining polynomial in w. So one observation is that since we've drastically reduced the size of our LPN instances we need to assume now the quasi or super polynomial security of LPN. But now if we go back to our main result we can understand why we require the super polynomial hardness of LPN in order to instantiate our protocol. Let's now briefly summarize how the protocol goes. The first step is to take the layered circuit and divide it into chunk of k consecutive layers where k is the desired factor of sublinearity. Then we take each chunk and break it down into blocks where the goal of each block is to compute only a small subset of the outputs. Finally each block can be evaluated using our new PCG. So when you plug all of this together we have a certain number of constraints on the dimension of the LPN problem, the size of the blocks, the width of the depth of the chunks and playing around with all these parameters we find a sweet spot where everything works together. The sublinearity factor can be anywhere from an arbitrarily small super constant factor to almost log log s and computation follows from whatever the communication is. With this I'd like to thank you very much for your attention and goodbye.