Welcome to class 21 on topics in power electronics and distributed generation. So far in the classes we have been looking at distribution systems. From the point of view of trying to understand what the impact of adding distributed generation system to the existing distribution system is going to be and we identified many concerns and we saw when we are having long feeders that you could have possibilities of o voltage under voltage along the feeder depending on location of the DG what it is trying to do etcetera. You have problems related to fault coordination and protection especially if there is a significant change in fault current levels now that is result of adding the DG unit. Also we saw that there is a possibility of unintentional islanding and there are variety of concerns if you have a situation of unintentional island. Also the compatibility of the existing distribution system equipment is a issue we saw that the reclosers there may be timing issues when you add the DG unit when you have sectionalizers you might think that you are operating without you are when the you are interrupting the sectionalizer when there is no current but the DG may introduce current when it is actually opening. There could be problems with open loop transformer on load tap changing transformers with their boost open loop boost functionality when you add a DG unit we saw there could be problems with series voltage regulators on ring feeders also these problems become more of a concern when you have more complicated distribution networks such as ring distribution or secondary network distribution you might have problems with voltage regulators network protectors etcetera. And the other thing we saw is some of these problems might seem to be insignificant when the scale of DG in the feeder is small. So, if it is just a couple of solar inverters sitting on one roof it might not seem like a big problem but the problem increases as the penetration of DG increases. So, if everyone starts adopting DG technology or there is DG of significant rating compared to the rating of the feeder then the problems increase. Also these are technical concerns there are non technical concerns such as who would bear the cost if you need to upgrade some of the existing equipment due to the addition of the DG then who should bear the cost. Also distribution system has multiple parties that are operating in such a system you have the distribution service provider you have a number of consumers and if you are using the distribution network to send power out then there is a question of ownership are you making use of something that someone else is owning to actually get benefit. Also there are issues of liability if you because of the addition of the DG causes damage to a neighbor or some other owner in the particular setup then who bears the liability of potential damage. So, it is important not just to address the technical issues but also the policy and regulatory framework issues associated with the distributed generation. And there are variety of people looking at it from these different perspectives. And one thing to keep in mind it is not that there are only problems there are advantages you can see that by adding the DG you can get benefits of power quality. Power quality benefits might be and because it is being you can add DG in a selective manner you could selectively consider which loads need higher power quality. And then have DG at those set of loads alone rather than having to upgrade to a more complex network such as ring or a network which would imply cost to all users on that particular network. So, you can have benefits of higher power quality we also saw that the feeder losses can come down quite dramatically. So, reduction in transmission losses you also saw that by appropriately adding the DG unit then it is possible to have flatter feeder voltage profile plus you have other benefits. For example, one might consider that adding renewable energy might be seen as a broader societal benefit and distributed generation is one possible way in which you could add renewables into a system of course you could have renewables as large centralized units too. Also if you look at the technical problems that we considered many of the problems require limiting of fault current contributions from the DG. So, you need DG systems where you can limit the fault current when there exists a fault and not have significant difference in fault current levels when you add the DG unit. Also we saw that some of the equipment might need to control the power flow at different sections of the feeder in a accurate and fast manner depending on the existing load power flow. So, you need fast power control and you also need possibility of very rapid switching. So, you need also a large number of switching are possible and if you look at all these requirements of limiting fault current level fast power control need for rapid switching of the interconnection device all those imply that you would have increased role of power electronics compared to the existing traditional systems that can be used for interconnection. So, the role of power electronics in distributed generation would be increasing as you proceed in time. But on the flip side if you look at say existing power electronic solution with the existing traditional solution we know that the cost of the power electronic systems are much higher than the existing traditional systems. For example, to send power out existing synchronous machine is actually much cheaper than a power converter to at this given power level. Also if you look at existing circuit breaker that is much cheaper than a semiconductor based circuit breaker. So, at the power level you if you now introduce power electronics there is a chance that the cost that you would see is much higher. And you want to make sure that you are doing things that are cost effective and you want to actually look at how can you verify the economics behind adding the power electronic system. So, that you are not going back in terms of say having overall economic system by adding the power electronic components and your designs or technological changes are moving in the right direction. So, with that background we will look at couple of the few ways in which you could look at cost benefit analysis once you add a DG system. And some of the things to keep in mind are many of the DG technologies compared to the mature existing power system technologies are relatively new and also evolving quite rapidly. So, also in many distribution that generation or storage type of application the installation at one location may not be identical to the installation at some other location you might need some customization depending on where you are actually trying to install the unit. So, you also want to look at what are the existing solutions for a given application and how does the DG system compare with the existing solution. Say for example, you might be thinking about a power quality application and you may want to see whether one particular existing solution may be adding a gen set or a traditional UPS how does a DG type of solution compared with the existing solution. So, if you also we need to look at it in terms of the significant challenges that exists especially when you are looking at issues such as say climate change or introduction of renewables into the existing system. A major challenge with respect to renewables or renewable energy is not to actually show a proof of concept prototype that renewable energy system can work, but actually to ensure that the cost of the renewable system is below that of say for example, coal. Coal is considered extremely energy generating electricity from coal is considered extremely cheap and you want to make sure that can you make the renewable system cheaper than coal if that is the case then you have a natural winner. So, looking at it from an economic perspective is pretty critical for engineering such systems. .. So, we will look at few metrics that can be used for DG systems and there are few ways say one particular way in which you might make a decision when you are making a purchase or thinking of installing a DG system is what the cost is.  So, if the coffee cost is higher than what you have in your wallet you may have to think I will not make this purchase. So, if you look at just look at the initial cost it is a very short time horizon decision you are making an instantaneous decision. So, and you typical decision like this would be made routinely when we go and make retail purchases and you are looking at essentially the cost of the product. You may not look at what might be the time implications of making that purchase for example, you might have to look at say some particular item that you buy, but that might need periodic servicing, but if you are just looking at the initial cost you are not looking at the long time horizon you are just looking at what the initial cost is before you make the decision. So, you are just looking at the cost of the product. The next thing that you could do is you might look at something that people routinely calculate is what is the payback period. So, if you are in payback period you are not looking at a instantaneous decision making, but you are spending some money and you are getting benefits of by making that purchase over some particular time frame and you are looking at in how much time can you actually get the benefit of spending that initial sum of money. So, again here you are related looking at a short time frame not very long you are talking of something of the order of may be a year and here say someone who is working in a commercial and environment may be your company is making an investment and you want to make sure whether your investment this year will get a return to you this year itself or will it be seen as a hit this year and then a return only next year in which case you might take a short term hit in your market value of your company. So, people might say one year if something is giving me return within a year then it is definitely worth doing. Here you are looking at cost of product plus cost of services. Another way in which you could look at evaluating a system is especially a distributed generation type of system is that you are actually generating energy and you could look at the cost of energy. What would be the rupees per kilowatt hour of electrical energy that is being output by such a system and this is people look at COE cost of energy and you are looking in this particular case at a very long time frame. So, when you are talking about the longer time frame you could also look at it from design point of you might be talking about decades and say if you are looking at you know what your existing cost of energy is and if you are looking at introducing particular source into the system whose cost is going to be twice the existing cost over the next one decade you know that your costs are going to actually ramp up over the decade. But if you know that your existing systems cost is also going to ramp up, but the system that you are adding is going to stay flat over a longer time frame then it means that in the long term what you are adding right now will actually make the cost of energy lower over the longer time frame. So, you could make things like policy decisions which particular energy portfolio you would like to invest in over the next decade because many times in a field such as energy you are looking at systems which have lifetimes of 20, 30, 40 years etcetera. If you look at a typical wind turbine you will design it for a life of at least 20 to 25 years when you are talking about nuclear plant people talk about licensing for 40 years after which you would need to renew the license if at all if you are looking at a dam you may be talking about 50 to 100 years lifetime for a dam. So, you are talking about systems which can actually stretch over a much longer time frame compared to some of the more common electronic items like a cell phone which might be in fashion for a year or may be two years. So, you are looking at something which can operate over much longer time frames. So, a cost of energy is actually good from a policy makers point of view and you are looking at overall benefits to the society by looking at what would be a appropriate portfolio for the particular variety of energy source that you would like to have in your system and the objective is to do it in a very cost effective manner keeping in mind all your commitments like say you would like your people to be healthy and not be suffering from pollution or some other or displacement or there might be many requirements when you are actually adding the particular energy source. Another possible way of looking at a metric for evaluating the economic value behind a DG system is sometimes people call it effective initial cost EIC or sometimes people in the commercial business side might look at it as a net present value. This is actually can be of a intermediate time frame and it can be depending on what time frame you are looking at whether it is one product which you might intend to operate for may be just 5000 operating hours or a product which might be working for 5 years or 20 years. So, depending on your product you can set your particular time frame and decide on what is the net present value of that particular product. So, it can be a benefit to engineering designers or you can look at say you are managing a system and you are looking at whether you are what your net present value is to make a decision on whether to take one particular choice or another particular choice. So, if you look at such a scheme which is actually helpful to make can be used to make technical choices and it considers you can incorporate in it issues of product plus services you could also have end of life considerations. So, you might in a system you might look at the construction cost, the commissioning cost, the operating cost whether you have fuel use or some maintenance cost you might also incorporate the decommissioning cost say associated with the system. For example, if you have a wind turbine your decommissioning might not be a cost you might say the steel in the tower might actually give you something that can be sold or reused. But say if you have electronic items you might have to dispose it in a safe manner. So, you might have some cost associated with disposal of e-waste etcetera. So, you have to look at what is appropriate cost or actually can be a benefit depending on the particular system that you are looking at. So, we look at example of some of these ways of evaluating will often you might need a combination of all of this. For example, you might like to know whether your particular product has what it is outlook is under very long term. You might also like to make your design decisions when you are actually designing the product based on another metric and you may also want to check what your payback period is because your customer to whom your product is sold might actually calculate the payback in based on some of the metric. So, you may want to look at all these things simultaneously when you are actually looking at a particular DG technology. So, we will start with one way of looking at it we will look at the payback period the initial look just looking at the initial cost is trivial all of us do it routinely. If you look at the payback period we will look specifically at an application such as power quality where you may want to make a decision on whether to purchase some equipment to mitigate poor power quality. So, you might be thinking about whether to purchase an UPS or a GENSET or some particular equipment and if you look at what is the worst situation of power quality you might have a situation where there is no electricity available to you at all you might think of an outage. So, if you look at such a situation not having electricity in one way it means that you are not paying for the electricity but often what you miss in terms of your activity that you can actually accomplish during the duration is much has a much higher economic value than the cost of the unserved energy. So, the cost of poor power quality to a customer or to a end user is actually typically much greater than the cost of the unserved energy which was which is not used because of the fact that the power quality is poor. Also if you look at we will look at this in a situation where you might be in a commercial or an industrial environment and you might say for example, if you have an outage you might have a down time in your production process you might have lost work people sitting around in a idle manner when because there is no power that is available and once the power comes back you might have to go through a recovery process there may be damage to equipment because of power quality for example, if you are operating something like a steel mill if you are hot steel bars just sit at a location when the power goes off you might actually damage thermally damage the location where the bar came and sat when the power went away. So, depending on your particular application you might end up with damaging equipment during when there is poor power quality. Also because of the poor power quality potential damage etcetera you might now have to stock more spares of equipment your inventories are larger. So, that is another cost that goes up you also have issues of your product quality going down because of poor power quality you might be machining one particular piece and half way through the machining the power went away and the machining smoothness might actually become extremely poor at that point you may have to scrap it and or the there may be blemish may be the blemish may be within acceptable tolerance. So, there is always the issue of having material which is blemish or something which you have to totally scrap and if you have to scrap something you have to again start off the process from the very beginning. So, there is a rework cost associated with poor power quality you could have other potential cost associated with power quality because your power went away now your delivery of may be you are having a textile unit you were expected to ship a batch of clothes on the end of the week now because of power went away you have to ship it the next week. So, your delivery schedule is delayed your customer is unhappy and so you end up paying in a wide variety of ways because of customer because of poor power quality and that question is what could you do to actually then decide when should I now do something to mitigate this problem of poor power quality. And one way to do it is to look at what your pay backs period is and looking at simple pay back you would know how much you are going to cost how much it is going to cost for purchasing the poor power quality mitigation equipment. So, you might know the cost of what a UPS is you might know the cost of a gen set you also know what your installation cost is in a particular side. So, you know the overall total investment that you are making for mitigating your situation of poor power quality then on the other side you are looking at what benefits that you get and you want to look at it on a annualized basis. So, you we previously saw that there are a number of costs associated with the power quality and so you could actually calculate what is the cost of idle labor cost of recovery cost of increased inventories etcetera on a annualized basis. So, you can because you are adding the equipment now you have this benefit as a benefit by adding this particular equipment, but it is not just benefit you might have to do servicing of the power quality equipment. If it is a gen set you might have to put fuel you might need to periodically lubricate it if it is a UPS you might have to periodically maybe replace the batteries you might have to fill in the electrolyte up to the appropriate level. So, this actually ongoing annual expense to and you are looking at what is the net annual expense and then you could very easily calculate what your pay back period is it is the net investment divided by your annual returns. So, multiply by 12 to get it in months. So, if you you can actually look at this IEEE standard which gives you a step by step process of looking at evaluating power systems compatibility with electronic process equipment which is essentially looking at power quality and its impact on a industrial or commercial type of environment. So, we will look at an example in this particular situation. Suppose you have injection molding plant and you are facing say 10 power outages a year you go through the list of cost associated with power quality and you look at cost per event is rupees say 272000 per event. So, this could include the loss labor loss product production cost to repair effect of power quality other miscellaneous cost etcetera and you have a number such as this and then you look at the capital cost of the DG say that is costing 40 lakhs and you have the installation cost of rupees 20 lakhs. And you are existing O and M operation and maintenance cost is rupees 4 lakhs and what we would assume is by adding this particular say a genset you are avoiding all the major outages and then if you look at what your investment is 40 lakhs plus 20 lakhs say and then you are looking at returns there are 10 events per year about 2.72 lakhs in return per event and your maintenance annual maintenance cost 4 lakhs. So, your net annual returns is so if you look at then your payback period.  So, then you might say instead of say 10 events per year means that you are having 1 major outage per or less than 1 major outage per month. Suppose you have another situation where you have say 1 major outage every other week. So, you are having maybe 26 outages per year. So, and because there are more outages your O and M cost has gone up to instead of 4 lakhs it is gone to 8 lakhs. Then if you look at what your new returns would be 26 into. So, in this case your payback period is so in this case it is less than a year and you might say now this is attractive proposition. So, you can see that in this example it is a same equipment that you are trying to sell you are not selling a different equipment, but it is that your customer requirement has is what is changed. So, if you have a product which meets your particular customer requirement you could actually find it to be a more effective product. Whereas, if you are designing an equipment which does not match the real power quality requirement that is typical in your particular system you might say find that it is not actually a effective solution. So, it is important to understand what your customer requirement is when you are thinking of whether a DG system is going to be effective. So, this is a fairly simple exercise to carry out. Next we will look at the cost of energy exercise where you are looking at a longer term cost and trends in terms of how to actually evaluate whether a DG system may be cost effective or not. So, when you are looking at cost of energy you are not thinking about capital cost as something that you pay on a instantaneous basis. One assumption that you are making is that the capital cost is actually taken as some sort of a loan and you are paying an effective equivalent yearly interest back to your lender. So, your capital cost is not seen as something that is affecting your system on an instantaneous basis, but spread over the longer time frame over which you are actually operating your equipment. Also, you have the operation and maintenance cost as we discussed in the previous example. Suppose, your DG system is making use of some fuel then depending on the amount of fuel that you put in is the energy that you could produce. So, you will have to look at potentially fuel cost. You might also have secondary benefits. For example, you might have a system where because you are actually producing electricity you might also have say your particular unit doing cogeneration which means that you might also have say hot water or cold cooling that is being provided. So, because of the hot water or cooling you might actually be able to reduce some other cost and you might also include that to actually see whether your what your benefits are and you can calculate your cost of energy on an appropriate basis. As you add all these together to form your annual cost and then you look at what is the energy produced on an annual basis by your DG unit. So, you divide the annual cost by the annual energy production that gives you your cost of energy. .. So, if you look at the cost of energy if you have something which has higher capital cost then your cost of energy tends to go up. If you have something which say you have one equipment which will produce energy with some degree of efficiency and then you have another equipment which produces with a higher degree of efficiency then typically you will have to pay more for something which is more efficient. So, you might end up paying more for a equipment which is more efficient, but you need to see are you proportionally getting so much more energy. If you are not then you might be actually paying more for a equipment than what its energy production justifies. So, you will have to look at it in multiple ways to see whether something is acceptable from your cost of energy perspective. Also if your interest rate is higher your cost of energy is going to go up. So, for example, in an area like renewables or alternate energy where you might have lots of small companies manufacturing DG units or different DG dealing with different technologies. The interest rate that a bank charges for a smaller company might be higher than as interest rate that lender would charge for a larger corporation or for a country for building a larger system. So, the smaller startups might feel a tougher time to enter into the business, but once you are successful things take off then your interest rate might come down. You might actually accelerate up and be able to ramp up in terms of what you could do. If you look at the fuel cost it depends on the particular type of technology that you are dealing with. For example, if you are looking at solar energy, wind energy, the renewables the fuel cost is 0 in which case the actual main cost would be your capital cost. Whereas, if you are looking at something like a fuel based system then like a diesel genset we will see that we will look at an example we will see that fuel cost is actually a major cost. If you look at the lifetime over which you are doing these calculations it is over the lifetime of this equipment. So, you might be talking about 20 to 30 years and if you look at your operation and maintenance cost there are 2 issues associated with operation and maintenance cost. If your equipment is less reliable you would have higher operation and maintenance cost. Also if your equipment is less reliable it means that you would have more time when it is sitting around idle and not producing energy. So, in the numerator the cost would go up and the denominator your energy production would come down. So, it is important to have a reliable equipment which would work over the time frame. So, as to minimize your cost of energy. So, looking at from all these perspective is a important aspect of looking at a energy system. So, we look at an example where you are using say you are considering a diesel genset and you want to see instead of purchasing power from your local distribution company would it make sense to just run the genset all the time and make use of the energy that is output of from the genset. So, we look at a simplified problem where if you then look at what is the energy content in 1 liter of diesel fuel you have 34 mega joules this is not milli joules this is mega joules of energy per liter and so if you look at the cost I mean the cost might go up more often than not it goes up rather than down and if you look at the cost of electricity your cost of electricity might range from 4 rupees to 7 rupees depending on what your consumption slab may be you might be a small consumer in which case you might have a discount if you are a large consumer here we are considering individual consumption your commercial rates might be even higher. So, we will consider electricity cost from your grid to be 7 rupees per kilowatt hour and we will assume that the energy conversion from the chemical form in diesel to electricity occurs with efficiency of 35 percent. So, if you look at say 1 liter of fuel in you are talking about 34 mega joules. So, if you look at it in terms of kilowatt hours 1 kilowatt hour is 10 to the power of 3 into 1 hour 3600 seconds. So, this would give you 9.4 kilowatt hours per liter of diesel fuel. So, if you look at say 1 liter of diesel fuel you are 34 mega joules is equivalent to 9.4 kilowatt hours of energy input and if you look at for 1 kilowatt hour out with a efficiency of 33 percent for 1 liter of fuel you have 35 percent into 9.4. So, you are talking about 3.3 kilowatt hours of output for 1 liter of fuel. So, if you are amount of so this a fair amount of waste going out as heat and small amount as sound going out of your genset and you can calculate your cost of energy assuming that say it is running with 1 liter being fed in on a per hour basis your cost of energy is 50 rupees per liter and there are 8760 hours per year. So, the annual energy the annual cost of fuel is 50 rupees into 8760 this is 24 into 24 hours per day 365 days a year and if you look at your energy output this is 3.3 kilowatt hours into 8760 hours per year. So, these two cancel out. So, you get cost of energy about rupees 15 per unit and 15 is much larger than 7. So, it just does not make sense to run your genset on a continuous basis you are better off by taking the energy from your distribution supply. So, then we will look at second possibility where you might consider your energy which is now being converted to electricity through one possible path and then you could also consider that out of the waste heat that is being produced in this particular IC engine. So, fuel to electricity you have a IC engine plus synchronous machine plus generate governor and exciter all the controls you might have a heat exchanger which is exchanging the heat and generating thermal output and your thermal output goes through a second path and you are make able to make use of say 45 percent of your thermal of your fuel input as a thermal output and you still have an overall waste of 20 percent of your input energy. So, we will look at in this particular case we will assume that because you are now making use of your thermal output previously may be you are making use of the thermal output to heat water may be in a electric geyser. Now, because you are able to use the thermal output from your DG system you are saving the energy which would have been spent otherwise in as your energy in your geyser. So, we could think about that as a potential secondary benefit. So, if you look at now your input energy you have your input energy is the same 9.6 9.4 kilowatt hours and if you look at your electricity output it is 3.3 kilowatt hours per liter and your thermal output is now 4.3 kilowatt hours and then if you look at your cost of energy. So, you have your fuel cost which is 50 rupees per liter and the benefits that you are getting by making use of this as your to prevent your electricity consumption at alternate point you would have 4.3 kilowatt hours into 7 rupees per unit which you are saving divided by your energy production is 3.3 kilowatt hours. So, you now get a number of 6.1 kilowatt hours per unit and now you have a number which is less than 7. So, potentially now you have something which might be economically feasible compared to the previous situation. So, people do combined heat and power operation of systems to make use of the waste heat to actually provide auxiliary services. Of course, in this case we neglected the capital cost and the maintenance cost and those costs will actually increase the number of from 6.1. In the next class what we will do is we will look at we will assume some cost for the DG system we will assume some cost for the generator we will assume some interest rate and operation and maintenance cost and we will look at how that would then change from the 6.1 and see whether it would still be a cost effective way of generating the generating power in the next class. Thank you.


Hi, I'm Dr. Magnus Jaraj Mansard, Consultant Liver Transplant Surgeon for the Manipal Group of Hospitals. Liver cancer develops in a damaged liver. So the best way to prevent liver cancer is to avoid damage to the liver. This can be either by preventing hepatitis infection by vaccination or moderating in the alcohol consumption so that the liver doesn't become fatty and maintaining a healthy lifestyle so that the fat content in the liver is not excessive. There are reports saying that coffee is beneficial, eating broccoli or drinking carrot juice are beneficial but these are not scientifically proven. Same thing goes for processed food or aspartame that is sugar-free, tablet consumption that can cause liver cancer and these still remain unproven scientifically.


The anti-Bitcoin and crypto sentiment runs wild and what I really think about when I see these types of messages come about is that the people just need a little more help and what I'm talking about today is there was a nice little Twitter account from Elizabeth Warren. This is Senator Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts here in the United States and she has made it her rally cry to build an anti-crypto army. So we've seen this before and we'll probably see it again as different senators and congressmen and women start to rally against crypto and when I see these things I just think to myself how did these things go so wrong because Elizabeth Warren was pretty anti-bank for the longest time. I think she still is but you have to understand the problem with politicians is that they're politicians. Really what it comes down to is this she has to get reelected. Her constituents come up to her and say look I have a problem with FTX with BlockFi with Voyager with Celsius so whatever it is and I got ripped off and you hear these things and you say okay I'm going to protect the little guy and I'm going to go against crypto and I think there's a problem when somebody like Elizabeth Warren who has done so much to rally against the banking sector and then she hears these things and says okay this is the same thing I need to help out my constituents so I can A help people and B get reelected and when this happens I just see it's a little bit of misguided trust in what's happening. There is a huge difference between the scam artists and the thief that is Sam Beckman free with FTX and the Voyagers and the Celsius and the BlockFi and anything else that's out there. There's a huge difference between that and an actual legitimate project such as Bitcoin and other crypto products that actually have real utility and the thread just kind of goes over what she's going to do I'm going to skip over that that was actually pretty funny right there and a lot of her things that are rally cries that she talks about how this is not a good investment this is a terrible investment and she lumps in Bitcoin with Dogecoin everything else I'm not here to debate that part but I got to tell you as far as like a poor investment in reality if we take a look at it as far as a store of value Bitcoin's been a fantastic investment in the 80s I mean $20 is going to get you a pretty good amount of food in your cart like you can see here in the graphic in 2000 it's not going to do anything in 2022 if you're spending $20 in Supermax in Puerto Rico you're not getting anything I hate to tell you that but if we take a look at just a couple of years ago 10 12 years ago one Bitcoin doesn't 11 could get you the same amount of food in the car because guess what it was about $20 or $30 just 10 years later one Bitcoin can get you a pretty nice car $69,000 in 2030 who knows what it's going to be so if we talk about the actual product as being a poor investment and things that are doing I just think that Elizabeth is just missing the mark I don't think she really understands really what's what's going on I mean heck even Michael Burberry from the big short fame said look this was just a day about five hours ago I was wrong to say sell so I said hey Jim Kramer you should take notes this is how it's actually done when you are incorrect so this is I still think a pretty good investment for me I can't tell you what to do I'm not an investment advisor so when I say these things I look out and I say that you know to instead of calling for hate and to really go against Elizabeth Warren I needed to help I needed to help her see what she is potentially missing how do you do that very simple there's this website warn.center.gov and I'm going to link this website in the description below and there's a little button right here that says share your opinion now let me stress this if you're going to share your opinion make it constructive help her to seek a light of where she may be missing some vital pieces of information and you can go even go down to say a meeting request a tour request or whatnot and put in your information now there are some things that are required and email and things like that I'm not saying you should give the perfect email but whatever you want to do and then just kind of give her a message as to why you are investor and why you think crypto is going pretty far so let me just think about that in the comment section again I'm not here to to spread discourse or hate I'm here to kind of enlighten people and help them get to where they want to go but I must tell you that a person that is really against banks like Elizabeth Warren there's a statistic that actually scares me and this was the Kobayashi lever I talked about the total banks in the US by year you know at 1920 we had 31,000 banks and then just you know 50 years later 1970 we had 13,500 a little bit less than half or more than half now in 2022 we have 4200 banks and it doesn't make a rocket science to figure out where we're going we're going to see less and less banks they're going to consolidate and they're going to pretty much own everything and if we get that factor into a CBDC then we're going to have a lot of problems going down in the future however as I've always said just because we get a CBDC doesn't mean that will rule the roost forever it just takes one time for them to shut off somebody's purchasing power for them to say you know what maybe there's an alternative option that I keep hearing about that I can potentially get into and and actually own and and have my own forms of money which is solid money might be bitcoin or some other digital assets so I think that there we're going in the wrong direction however there are some good shining lights and this right here is congressman Tom Emmer and he is for the banking he's doing a on the banking committee I believe where he has the FDIC chair and this is Martin Gruenberg of the FDIC and he's going to say a couple things and this is from Nick Carter and he catches them in a couple of lies so this is about a minute and a half and one of those is he talks about you know if we if we sell Silicon Valley Bank will it be easy to have 247 access like the different crypto producers actually had and the second one is did the FDIC ever say to any other bank that will potentially be purchasing Silicon Valley Bank that this will be overly burdensome or onerous for them to service these crypto platforms so just take a listen I will you commit that a bank that buys signet will be able to use it to facilitate 247 access to the banking system for digital asset companies I'm happy to look into that I don't know who the buyer was but be glad to look into it and follow up with you in regard you're not going to block the buyer from doing 247 banking for digital asset companies is that correct if that's the nature of the acquisition yes and will you commit that a bank that buys signet or the bank did will be able to to onboard new digital asset customers again I'd like to look into the transaction but I'd be glad to follow up with you in regard to it when the FDIC sold off Silicon Valley's bank Valley banks deposits to first citizens did that include deposits from any digital asset firms or vcs in the digital asset space I believe all of the deposits from the failed Silicon Valley bank were transferred to first citizens including the digital all of them yes we're all of SBB's deposits from digital asset businesses I again transferred to citizens that's what you're saying my understanding for citizens assumed all the deposits as the FDIC ever communicated implicitly or explicitly sir to any banks that their supervision will be more onerous in any way if they take on new or maintain existing digital asset clients no thank you the F so yeah there is some shining light out there it looks like there are some people out there fighting for little guy the crypto and digital asset investor and then just to get to the point of what was said here by Martin Grunberg where he said no we would never say that it's overly burdensome to do any kind of banking with crypto and digital assets this is from the FDIC website itself and it's it says quite clearly here issuing or holding as principal crypto assets that are issues to order transferred on an open public and our decentralized network or similar system is highly likely to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices so I don't really couldn't say that they would explicitly say it's a bit tougher but it does say on the website however to be fair they do say very clearly banking organizations are neither prohibited nor discouraged from providing banking services to customers of any specific class or type as permitted by law regulation but again on the flip side they're saying you could do it it isn't going to be easy so let me just think about that and to finish up there are some good pieces of information this is from Seeking Alpha new bull market is born and they just go over some some little highlights of why they think that a bull market is is here already and it's said here that the NASDAQ 100 is now in a bull market and I was thinking myself like is it really in a bull market but right here it says it says it pretty clearly you're setting yourself up for one of the best quarters of NASDAQ 100 since 2020 and we're going to see as far as like percentage gains and I got me thinking like wow how far off are we for NASDAQ I took a look and over what just well first of all just go to a day looking pretty good quite honestly over five days all right now we're talking one month yeah six months still pretty good and then we take a look over five years still pretty darn good even even if we take a look at the peak so if we're taking a look at price action things are moving in a direction which I didn't think we would really see this is why I dialed across average because I'm not here to time the market market perfectly I'm just here to be a participant and what is that what has that done for the market itself well it was pretty good today a little bit of a drop off I think we hit around 29,000 that we're down to almost 28,000 and there's a little bit of action sideways here we go XRP is up 27% in seven days because of rumors of potential settling of the court case against Ripple but hey who knows and that's it for today there's a couple of things before we take off and I can make mention of first of all Coin Ledger who is a sponsor of the show this is for tax software which what I use personally they just got it into where you're able to connect your Cardano wallets which is something that's when David came on he talked about we're going to do this pretty soon and I was like yeah they usually do it and here we are today so they've done that this is what I think people have been asking for again very simple to use for tax offer don't be afraid of taxes you can make it super simple from the time that I set it all up API integration shot it off to my CPA 30 minutes link in the description I even show you how to do it and lastly we had a great episode this was really fun actually today it was it was me Ben and Guy Coin Bureau and the Cryptiverse and went over just a plethora of different things different stuff that we talked about the Binance lawsuit Shanghai upgrade the altcoins that we are getting into and Ben's comments about that the Fed and fundamentals and of course the World Reserve currencies as we see the dollar is being trifled off and looks like China is coming to the action and Guy had a really good insight in that so I will link that at the end of this video and also in the description but that is it for today so look like today's video give a thumbs up consider subscribing let me talk about is time sensitive but that's it for today thanks so much I appreciate it and I'll see you on the next one