Live from New York, it's theCUBE. Covering theCUBE, New York City, 2018. Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media and its ecosystem partners. Hello everyone, welcome to this CUBE special presentation here in New York City for CUBE NYC, I'm John Furrier, Dave Vellante. This is our ninth year covering the big data industry starting with Hadoop World and it evolves over the years. It's our ninth year day we've been covering Hadoop World, Hadoop Summit, Strata Conference, Strata Hadoops. Now it's called Strata Data. I don't know if Strata, they'll right, I was going to call it next. As you all know, the CUBE has been president and creation of the Hadoop big data ecosystem. We're here for our ninth year. Certainly a lot's changed. AI is the center of the conversation. And certainly we've seen some horses come in. Some haven't come in and the trends have emerged. Some have gone away. Your thoughts, nine years covering data. I remember fondly, vividly, the call that I got. I was in Dallas at a storage networking world show and you called and said, hey, we're doing Hadoop World. Get over there. And of course Hadoop big data was the new hot thing. I told everybody I'm leaving. Most of the people said, what's Hadoop? So we came, we started covering, it was people like Jeff Hammabacher, Amarawa Dalla, Doug Cutting who invented Hadoop, Mike Olson, you know, head of Cloudera at the time. And people like Abhimeta who at the time was at B of A. And some of the things we learned then that were profound as much as Hadoop is sort of on the back burner now and people really aren't talking about it. Some of the things that are profound about Hadoop really were the idea, the notion of bringing five megabytes of code to a petabyte of data, for example, or the notion of no schema on right. You know, put it into the database and then figure it out. Unstructured data, object storage. And so that created a spate of innovation, of funding. We were talking last night about many, many years ago at this event, this time of the year, concurrent with Stroudy, you'd have VCs all over the place. Really aren't a lot of VCs here this year, not a lot of VC parties as there used to be. So that's somewhat waned. But some of the things that we talked about back then, we said that the big money and big data is going to be made by the practitioners, not by the vendors. And that's proved true. I mean, the big three Hadoop distro vendors, Cloudera, Hortonworks, and MapR, Cloudera, $2.5 billion valuation, not bad, but it's not a $30, $40 billion value company. The other thing we said is there will be no red hat of big data. You said, well, the only red hat of big data might be red hat. And so that's basically proved true. And so I think if we look back, we always talked about Hadoop and big data being a reduction, the ROI was a reduction on investment. It was a way to have a cheaper data warehouse. And that's essentially- Well, what do we get right and wrong? I mean, let's look at some of the trends. But first, I think we got pretty much everything right. As you know, we tend to make the calls pretty accurately with theCUBE, got a lot of data. We have the analytics in our own system, plus we have the research team digging in. So we pretty much do a good job. I think one thing that we predicted was that Hadoop certainly would change the game, and that did. We also predicted that it wouldn't be a red hat for Hadoop that was at production. The other prediction was is that we said Hadoop won't kill data warehouses. It didn't. And then data lakes came along. You know, my position on data lakes, I've always hated the term. I always liked data ocean, because I think it was much more fluidity of the data. So I think we got that one right. And data lake still doesn't look like it's going to be panning out well. I mean, most people that deploy data lakes, it's really either not a core thing or it's part of something else and it's turning into a data swamp. So I think the data lake piece is not panning out the way people thought it would be. I think one thing we did get right also is that data would be the center of the value proposition and it continues to remains to be. And I think we're seeing that now. And we said data is the development kit back in 2010 when we said data is going to be part of programming. Some of the other things, our early data, and we went out and we talked to a lot of practitioners who it was hard to find in the early days. They were just a select view.  And but what they told us is that things like SQL and the enterprise data warehouse were key components of their big data strategy. So to your point, it wasn't going to kill the EDW but it was going to surround it. The other thing we called was cloud. About four of years ago, our data showed clearly that much of this work, the modeling, the big data wrangling, et cetera was being done in the cloud. And Cloudera, Hortonworks and MapR, none of them at the time really had a cloud strategy. Today, that's all they're talking about. This cloud is hybrid cloud. It was four years ago, I think, Dave, when we actually were riffing on the notion of Cloudera's name, it's called Cloud Era. If you spell it out in Cloud Era, we're in a Cloud Era. And I think we were very aggressive at that point. I think Amar Awadala even made a comment on Twitter. He was like, I don't understand what you guys are coming from. We were actually saying at the time that Cloudera should actually leverage more cloud at that time. And they didn't. They stayed on their IPO track. And they had to because they've had everything bedded on Impala and this data model that they had and being a business model then, then they went public. But I think clearly, Cloud is now part of Cloudera's story and I think it's a good call. And it's not too late for them and never was too late, but Cloudera has executed. And if you look at what's happened with Cloudera, they were the only game in town. When we started the queue, we were in their office as most people know in this industry that we were there with Cloudera and they had like 17 employees. I thought Cloudera was going to run the table. But then what happened was Hortonworks came out of the Yahoo, that I think changed the game. And I think in that competitive battle between Hortonworks and Cloudera, in my opinion, changed the industry. Because if Hortonworks did not come out of Yahoo, Cloudera would have had an uncontested run. I think that landscape of the ecosystem would have looked completely different had Hortonworks not competed. Because you think about they, if they had that competitive battle for years, Hortonworks, Cloudera battle. And I think it changed the industry. I think it could have been different outcome if Hortonworks wasn't there. I think Cloudera probably would have taken Hadoop and making it so much more. And I think it would have gotten more done. Yeah, and I think the other point we have to make here is complexity really hurt the Hadoop ecosystem. And it was just bespoke, new projects coming out all the time. And you had Cloudera, Hortonworks, and to maybe to a lesser extent, MapR doing a lot of the heavy lifting, particularly Hortonworks and Cloudera. They had to invest a lot of their R&D in making these systems work and integrating them. And complexity just really broke the back of the Hadoop ecosystem. And so then Spark came in, everybody said, oh, Spark's going to basically replace Hadoop. Yes and no, the people who got Hadoop right, embraced it and they still use it. Spark definitely simplified things. But now the conversation has turned to AI, John. So I got to ask you, I'm going to use your line on you and kind of ask me anything segment here. AI, is it same wine, new bottle, or is it really substantively different in your opinion? I think it's something different. I don't think it's the same wine in a new bottle. I'll tell you what, well it's kind of. It's like the bad wine is going to be kind of blended in with the good wine, which is now AI. If you look at this industry, the big data industry, if you look at what O'Reilly's did with this conference, I think O'Reilly really has not done a good job with the conference of big data. I think they blew it. I think that they made it a monetization closed system when the big data business could have been all about AI in a much deeper way. I think AI is subordinate to cloud. And you mentioned cloud earlier. If you look at all the action within the AI segment, Diane Greene talking about at Google Next, Amazon. AI is a software layer substrate that will be underpinned by the cloud. Cloud will drive more action. You need more compute, that drives more data. More data drives the machine learning, drives the AI. So I think AI is always going to be dependent upon cloud ends or some sort of high compute resource base. And all the cloud analytics are feeding into these AI models. So I think cloud takes over AI, no doubt. I think this whole ecosystem of big data gets some zoomed under either at AWS, VMworld, Google and Microsoft cloud show. And then also I think specialization around data science is going to go off on its own. So I think you're going to see the breakup of the big data industry as we know it today. Strata Hadoop, Strata Data Conference, that thing's going to crumble into multiple fractured ecosystem. It's already starting to be forked. I think the other thing I want to say about Hadoop is that it actually brought such great awareness to the notion of data, putting data at the core of your company, data and data value, the ability to understand how data at least contributes to the monetization of your company. AI would not be possible without the data. And we've talked about this before, you call it the innovation sandwich. The innovation sandwich last decade, last three decades has been Moore's law. The innovation sandwich going forward is data, machine intelligence applied to that data and cloud for scale. And that's the sandwich of innovation over the next 10 to 20 years. Yeah, and I think data is everywhere.  I know data warehouse is kind of its own category and you're seeing that, but I don't think it's like a magic quadrant anymore. It's every quadrant has data. So I think data is fundamental. I think that's why it's going to become a layer within a control plane of either cloud or some other system. I think that's pretty clear. There's no like one, you can't buy big data, you can't buy AI. I think you can have AI, things like TensorFlow, but it's going to be a completely, every layer of the stack is going to be impacted by AI and data. And I think the big players are going to infuse their applications and their databases with machine intelligence. You're going to see this, you certainly see it with IBM, the sort of Watson heavy lift, clearly Google, Amazon, Facebook, Alibaba, Microsoft, they're infusing AI throughout their entire set of cloud services and applications and infrastructure. And I think that's good news for the practitioners. People aren't, most companies aren't going to build their own AI, they're going to buy AI, and that's how they close the gap between the sort of data haves and the data have nots. And again, I want to emphasize that the fundamental difference to me anyway is having data at the core. If you look at the top five companies in terms of market value, US companies, Facebook maybe not so much anymore because of the fake news, but the Facebook will be back with its two billion users, but Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, those five have put data at the core and then the most valuable companies in the stock market from a market cap standpoint. Why? Because it's a recognition that that intangible value of the data is actually quite valuable. And even though banks and financial institutions are data companies, their data lives in silos. So these five have put data at the center, surrounded it with human expertise as opposed to having humans at the center and having data all over the place. So how do these companies close the gap? How do the companies in the flyover states close the gap? The way they close the gap in my view is they buy technologies that have AI infused in it. And I think the last thing I'll say is I see cloud as the substrate and AI and blockchain and other services as the automation layer on top. And I think that's going to be the big tailwind for innovation over the next decade. Yeah, and obviously the theme of machine learning drives a lot of the conversations here and that's essentially never going to go away. Machine learning is the core of AI. And I would argue that AI truly doesn't even exist yet. It's machine learning and really driving the value. But to put a validation on the fact that cloud is going to be driving AI business is the, some of the terms in popular conversations we're hearing here in New York around this event and topic, CUBE NYC and Stratoconference is you're hearing Kubernetes and blockchain and these automation AI operation conversations. That's an IT conversation. So that's interesting. You got IT really with storage. You got to store the data. So you can't not talk about workloads and how the data moves with workloads. So you're starting to see data and workloads kind of be tossed in the same conversation. That's a cloud conversation. That is all about multi-cloud. That's why you're seeing Kubernetes, a term I'd never thought I would be saying at a big data show, but Kubernetes is going to be key for moving workloads around of which there's data instrumenting the workloads, data inside the workloads, data driving data. This is where AI and machine learning is going to play. So again, cloud assumes AI. That's the story. And I think that's going to be the big trend. Well, and I think you're right on it. That's why you're seeing the messaging of hybrid cloud and from the big distro vendors. And the other thing is you're hearing from a lot of the NoSQL database guys, they're bringing acid compliance. They're bringing enterprise grade capability. So you're seeing the world is hybrid. You're seeing those two worlds come together. So their worlds, it's getting leveled in the playing field out there. It's going to all about enterprise, B2B, AI, cloud and data. That's the cube bringing the data here. New York City, cube NYC, that's the hashtag. Stay with us for more coverage live in New York after this short break.


issued by the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Internet Security addressed to the Secretary to the Cabinet. In the letter, the Secretary to the Cabinet is asked to petition the Vatican through the diplomatic representatives of the Pope in Zambia over a named clergy who is alleged to be working with foreign entities to destabilize the government. Another letter circulating on social media is purported to have been written by the President of the Republic of Zambia, his Excellency Mr. Againde Isilema, to the Director General, Zambia Security Intelligence Service, in which it is alleged that the President had given several directives regarding the Roman Catholic Church. Let me family state that at no time has the head of state or indeed my Permanent Secretary written to petition the Vatican or to probe the Roman Catholic Church. It is equally saddening to notice a trend by some individuals and media houses who are quick and excited to jump on these unauthenticated documents and publish them as news reports. Such levels of anarchy and lawlessness will not be tolerated in the name of freedom of expression that has been granted to the citizens of Zambia. The people behind these acts ought to know that freedoms have limits and should not result in recklessness and alarming the nation. It must be stated that these documents are seditious in nature and the consequences of sedition in this country are severe. We are aware that elements are bent on wanting to wage a rift between the government and some churches in the country. The New Dawn administration enjoys very good relationship with faith-based organizations including the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church in particular has been cooperating with the government in many sectors such as education and health amongst others. I also want to inform the nation through you my colleagues in the media that the cabinet of the New Dawn administration is comprising not less than a third of the membership being Catholic. It just shows you that the government has a very strong relationship with the Catholic Church. I, for example, am a Catholic and a number of cabinet colleagues, as I have been getting more than 15 of the cabinet members are Catholic. It shows the bond and the relationship between this government and the Catholic Church. It is also important to note that the Catholic Church has always been in the forefront to ensure that government provides for the people of the country. We appreciate, as the New Dawn government, what the Catholics have done for this country. In no one, I repeat, in no one, whether Catholic or not will be able to draw a wedge between the Catholic Church and this government. The Catholic Church and ourselves are here to save the people of Zambia. The Catholic Church in this country is not an opponent of the New Dawn administration. Recently, the president of the Republic of Zambia had a very fruitful meeting with the Catholic bishops at Statenhouse, where a number of issues were discussed. It therefore follows that because of the good relationship that is existing between the Catholic Church and government, certain individuals who are not, and certain members of the Church have found it in their interest to wage a rift between government and the Catholic Church. That should not be accepted by the people of Zambia. The people of Zambia in all the localities of this country know what the Catholic Church has done, and they know the relationship between government and the Church. I want to mention, as I indicated earlier, that these publications which have been circulated are seditious in nature. And let it be known that sedition is a very serious affair in this country. For those who are perpetrating these activities, don't blame anyone when you are caught and found wanting by the law enforcement institutions of this country. Let it also be known that under the Cyber Securities Act, anyone, not just the one who was authored, anyone who uttered and circulates such seditious articles, comments and fence, let members of the public desist from doing such acts for the long arm of the law who catch up with them. I also want to appeal on behalf of the government of the Republic of Zambia to the Zambian populace at large that please, let's desist forthwith from making any comments or publishing any statements that encourages or abetting the rift between the Church and government. It is not in the interest of anyone in this country to wage a war against government using the Church. We know the intentions of the individuals who are doing this. We know the intentions. We are aware of what they have been trying to do for quite some time now, but let it be known that the secret wings of government are working around the clock to ensure that the culprits are brought to go. It's not enthralling to anyone, as others always think. But if you are commenting on offence, be assured that at one time or the other you will be held accountable. Right now we are calling upon, on behalf of government, we are calling upon law enforcement institutions to cut out thorough investigations pertaining to this issue. This wage which is being carried out, if not contained, can bring serious acrimony in the country. We call upon every right-thinking Zambian to support the core of government, to ensure that we continue with peace and stability and create harmony between the Church and the government of the Republic of Zambia. I also want to appeal to those who are being cited to reflect on their conduct. They should think about not just themselves, they must think about the country, Zambia. A country that has always been a beacon of peace. A country that has not been divided on the religious ground. That is the Zambia which all of us yearn to live in. We have also noted with concern the individuals, their videos circulating where they are indicating that those who have been arrested and charged are arrested based on their ethnic city. Don't cry foul and bring in issues of ethnicity after you have committed an offence and the long arm of the law catches up with you. It's not correct.  We are aware of individuals who were touting the law enforcement agency and even telling the nation that they had the evidence pertaining to the issues they were raising. But now they are crying foul. They are alleging ethnicity. Was there any ethnicity in the issues they were raising? The answer is no. So let's not do that. Because of the press, our dear colleagues would like to appeal to you that as you cut out your noble duties, please take caution that some of the information that is being paid on social media is false. Verify before you publish. Colleagues, I would like to thank you more sincerely for coming to once again listen to us pertaining to this very important issue which we are bringing to your attention. Thank you so much.


The president's remarks upon signing the immigration bill on Liberty Island in New York City, October 3, 1965. Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Ambassador Goldberg, distinguished members of the leadership of the Congress, distinguished governors and mayors, my fellow countrymen. We have called the Congress here this afternoon not only to mark a very historic occasion, but to settle a very old issue that is in dispute. That issue is to what congressional district does Liberty Island really belong, Congressman Farbstein or Congressman Gallagher? It will be settled by whomever of the two can walk first to the top of the Statue of Liberty. This bill that we will sign today is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions. It will not reshape the structure of our daily lives or really add importantly to either our wealth or our power. Yet it is still one of the most important acts of this Congress and of this administration. Or it does repair a very deep and painful flow in the fabric of American justice. It corrects a cruel and enduring wrong in the conduct of the American nation. Speaker McCormick and Congressman Sellard, more than almost 40 years ago, first pointed that out in their maiden speeches in the Congress. And this measure that we will sign today will really make us truer to ourselves, both as a country and as a people. It will strengthen us in a hundred unseen ways. And I have come here to thank personally each member of the Congress who labored so long and so valiantly to make this occasion come true today and to make this bill a reality. I cannot mention all their names for it would take much too long. But my gratitude and that of this nation belongs to the 89th Congress. We are in debt, too, to the vision of the late beloved President John Fitzgerald Kennedy and to the support given to this measure by the then Attorney General and now Senator Robert F. Kennedy. In the final days of consideration, this bill had no more able champion than the present Attorney General, Nicholas Katzenbach, who with New York's own Manny Sellard and Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts and Congressman Fegan of Ohio and Senator Mansfield and Senator Dirksen constituting the leadership of the Senate and Senator Javits helped to guide this bill to passage along with the help of the members sitting in front of me today. This bill says simply that from this day forth, those wishing to immigrate to America shall be admitted on the basis of their skills and their close relationships to those already here. This is a simple test and it is a fair test. Those who can contribute most to this country, to its growth, to its strength, to its spirit will be the first that are admitted to this land. The fairness of this standard is so self-evident that we may well wonder that it has not always been applied. Yet the fact is that for over four decades the immigration policy of the United States has been twisted and has been distorted by the harsh injustice of the national origins quota system. Under that system the ability of new immigrants to come to America depended upon the country of their birth. Only three countries were allowed to supply 70% of all the immigrants. Families were kept apart because a husband or a wife or a child had been born in the wrong place. Men of needed skill and talent were denied entrance because they came from southern or eastern Europe or from one of the developing countries. This system violated the basic principle of American democracy, the principle that values and rewards each man on the basis of his merit as a man. It has been un-American in the highest sense because it has been untrue to the faith that brought thousands to these shores even before we were a country. Today with my signature this system is abolished. We can now believe that it will never again shatter the gate to the American nation with the twin barriers of prejudice and privilege. Our beautiful America was built by a nation of strangers. From a hundred different places or more they have poured forth into an empty land joining and blending in one mighty and irresistible tide. The land flourished because it was fed from so many sources because it was nourished by so many cultures and traditions and peoples. And from this experience almost unique in the history of nations has come America's attitude toward the rest of the world. We, because of what we are, feel safer and stronger in a world as varied as the people who make it up, a world where no country rules another. And all countries can deal with the basic problems of human dignity and deal with those problems in their own way. Now, under the monument which has welcomed so many to our shores, the American nation returns to the finest of its traditions today. The days of unlimited immigration are past. But those who do come will come because of what they are and not because of the land from which they sprung. When the earliest settlers poured into a wild continent, there was no one to ask them where they came from. The only question was, were they sturdy enough to make the journey? Were they strong enough to clear the land? Were they enduring enough to make a home for freedom? And were they brave enough to die for liberty if it became necessary to do so? And so it has been through all the great and testing moments of American history. Our history this year we see in Vietnam. Men there are dying. Men named Fernandez and Zajac and Zelinko and Mariano and McCormick. Neither the enemy who killed them nor the people whose independence they have fought to save ever asked them where they or their parents came from. They were all Americans. It was for free men and for America that they gave their all. They gave their lives themselves. And by eliminating that same question as a test for immigration, the Congress proves ourselves worthy of those men and worthy of our own traditions as a nation. So it is in that spirit that I declare this afternoon to the people of Cuba that those who seek refuge here in America will find it. The dedication of America to our traditions as an asylum for the oppressed is going to be upheld. I have directed the Departments of State Injustice and Health and Education and Welfare to immediately make all the necessary arrangements to permit those in Cuba who seek freedom to make an orderly entry into the United States of America. My concern will be with those Cubans who have been separated from their children and their parents and their husbands and their wives that are now in this country. Our next concern is with those who are in prison for political reasons. And I will send to the Congress tomorrow a request for supplementary funds of $12,600,000 to carry forth the commitment that I am making today. I am asking the Department of State to seek through the Swiss government immediately the agreement of the Cuban government in a request to the President of the International Red Cross Committee. The request is for the assistance of the committee in processing the movement of refugees from Cuba to Miami. Miami will serve as a port of entry in a temporary stopping place for refugees as they settle in other parts of this country. And to all the voluntary agencies in the United States, I appeal for their continuation and expansion of their magnificent work. Their help is needed in the reception and settlement of those who choose to leave Cuba. The federal government will work closely with these agencies in their task of charity and brotherhood. And I want all the people of this great land of ours to know of the really the enormous contribution which the compassionate citizens of Florida have made to humanity and to decency. And all states in this union can join with Florida now in extending the hand of helpfulness and humanity to our Cuban brothers. The lesson of our times is sharp and clear in this movement of people from one land to another. Once again it stamps the mark of failure on a regime when many of its citizens voluntarily choose to leave the land of their birth for a more hopeful home in America. The future holds little hope for any government where the present holds no hope for the people. And so we Americans will welcome these Cuban people. For the tides of history run strong, and in another day they can return to their homeland to find it cleansed of terror and free from fear. For my shoulders here you can see Ellis Island whose vacant corridors echo today the joyous sound of long ago voices. And today we can all believe that the lamp of this grand old lady is brighter today and the golden door that she guards gleams more brilliantly in the light of an increased liberty for the people from all countries of the globe. Thank you very much.


Hi, I'm Zor. Welcome to Unizor Education. Today we will continue talking about electronics, which means usage of electricity for other purposes than mechanical rotation or heat. Well, primarily electronics are used in radio, television, telephones, etc. Now, the previous lecture was about one particular device called diodes and how it's arranged, how it works, its main principles, and today we will continue talking about another device called triode. So triodes are kind of slightly different than diodes and they have a slightly different purpose, but it's a relatively simple electronic device, which is used everywhere.  Anyway, so triodes are just one of the most elementary electronic devices and that's what we were talking about today. This lecture is part of the course called Physics for Teens, presented at Unizor.com. On the same site you can find the prerequisite course, Maths for Teens. Now, the site is completely free. There are no ads, so you can use it at your purpose at any time and for those who are interested in challenging themselves, the course has a lot of exercises and exams. You can take it as many times as you want and you will be basically graded. Okay, so triodes. The main purpose of this device called triode is to amplify signals. Well, and amplification is definitely needed for radio, for instance, when a very weak signal actually is caught by antenna and you want to basically amplify it. So, we will talk about how this particular device is made, arranged, what's the principle of its work and I will use the old-fashioned vacuum tube construction just to demonstrate the principle. Contemporary triodes and diodes and everything else actually is produced differently. They're using semiconductor integrated schemas, etc. But in any case, the most important is the principle and that's the purpose of the whole course actually. I don't go to any real technical details, but the principle is important and the principle is very well demonstrated when we examine the very first triodes made by certain inventors and they are based on vacuum tubes. Okay, so let's start with whatever we had the previous lecture, the diodes. If you remember diodes have the heated cathode which has certain electronic cloud because it's heated and electrons are they're making very, very fast movements because of the heat exaltate them. What's the word and we're looking for the word? Excites them, okay, and they have, they form the cloud, electron, electrons cloud around this. It's called termionic emission. So the termionic emission the heated cathode has this electronic, electrons cloud. So this is a minus for instance, okay. Now, this is a plus and this is anode. So now if this is minus and this is plus, the electrons in this cloud are attracted by positive anode and they flow and there is an electric current, but if this is plus and this is minus there are no excess of electrons here. So there is no cloud. So the current is not really going. The electrons actually are not going from minus to plus. Anode is cold. So electrons do not have any kind of, there is no termionic emission on there because anode is cold, cathode is hot. So it's always electrons are always going from hot to cold, okay. So that's why if you have an alternating current here, then when this is minus and this is plus, electrons move this way. When this is minus and this is plus, electrons do not move. So that's why we have the graph of flow of electricity like this. Instead of if we do not have this, if we will have a direct connection, this is the variable alternating current going back and forth, back and forth, but in case if we have this construction, we have basically cut that piece and we had some other smart devices to make the smoother that was in the last lecture. But I wanted to remind you the construction of the diodes because this is the first step in creating a triode. Now, what happens if we will put a grid negatively charged here? Well, when cathode is negative, you have this termionic emission, you have cloud of electrons, but if this is negative, it actually repels all these electrons and electrons could not really go that way. So my point is that while it's still working as a diode, so to speak, I mean only if it's negative and this is positive, we can really think about electric current, not when this is positive and this is negative. However, even in this case the flow of electrons can be controlled by the voltage between this and this. So between these two, between cathode and the grid. If there is a negative voltage here, then this flow of electrons will be, well, smaller basically if you wish. So this is the main principle. By changing the voltage negative voltage, relative to cathode on the grid, we can prevent, partially or completely, the flow of electrons. Now, why do we need it? We need it for this purpose. This will be the voltage between these two, will be our input voltage, so to speak. And the voltage which we can get from between cathode and anode would be our output voltage, so to speak. I'll talk about a concrete schema a little bit later. But this is the purpose. So by changing the potential between anode and cathode, we can change the intensity of the flow. But changing the voltage between grid and cathode, we can regulate this flow. And that's the main kind of idea behind the amplifier, which allows to even smaller input voltage between grid and cathode, convert into synchronous, but by amplitude higher amperage between cathode and anode. Okay. So that's the principle. What I would like actually to do right now is to present a concrete schema, very imperfect. However, it demonstrates actually the principle of amplifying the signal. Okay. So it's done the following way. So let's assume that we have some kind of vacuum tube here. Okay. I forgot to mention one little detail. Sometimes the cathode is arranged a little bit more, I would say, more sophisticated if you wish. You see, we have to heat it, right? Because the cathode is supposed to be heated to form the thermionic cloud. Now, if we will just connect it to the source of electricity, so it will basically heat by electricity, by direct current, let's say. It will interfere with these voltages between cathode and anode. So what's actually done, we have a parallel kind of a spiral here. And here we have heated element. So this is heated, but this is very close to it, so it actually heated as well. But without interference of voltage or current from this battery, which is supposed to just just just to heat the cathode. Alright, so but this is a small detail. The main principle is, so you have this cathode and this anode and cathode is heated. Now, let's consider that we have an input voltage between these two. Whatever the variable signal is. It can be a radio signal, for instance, which somehow, using antenna, is converted into small oscillations of the voltage between these two, between the grid and the cathode. So this is my input. Voltage. Now, on the other hand, we will have this thing connected. But we do need a source of energy. Let's say we have a DC battery here. Relatively powerful. So we have some kind of a difference of potential between cathode and anode and this might be more powerful, actually. Now this is input. Okay. And now what I will do between this Well, I do need some kind of a load here, so we don't have a shortage. Okay, let's say this is some kind of a load. So we don't have a short but we also would like to have an output voltage. And output voltage is between cathode and anode. So this is my output. Now what happens is the following. For instance, grid is neutral, relatively to cathode. So there is no changing voltage or anything like this. There is zero here. Well, then what happens is we do have heated cathode and anode will be positively charged, cathode will be negatively charged. So the flow will be just one way like a diode, right? Okay. Now the intensity of this flow depends on the power of this source of electricity, this DC battery, right? Stronger the battery, the more voltage it creates between anode and cathode, the more intense the flow of electrons will be and that's why we have a higher amperage. So amperage depends on this. Now and it can be relatively high, obviously. Now what happens if using this negative potential on my grid, I will regulate this. Well, if I will put some negative charge relative to cathode on this grid, it will prevent electrons. So if this is my input voltage, so it's changing, let's say the radio signal it has certain frequencies, amplitude, etc. So as this thing is changing, so the flow of electrons, however powerful it is, depending on the power of this battery, will also fluctuate. It will fluctuate in sync with fluctuation of this, but amplitude will be different because amplitude depends on this. So the flow will be different and that and therefore the output voltage between these two will also depend on the input voltage, but the strengths, the amplitude would depend on the strengths of this battery. And obviously I have to really put some some kind of ground here. So the whole thing is supposed to be grounded. That's the main principle of a very very simple amplifier. Well, obviously the real amplifiers are much more much more complex and they need some calculations. I mean what kind of voltage should be put here? And what kind of voltage is exist here to have a signal on the output, which basically is sufficient enough to let's say drive the speakers. So whenever the signal comes from the radio, let's say you have to amplify it and amplification will probably involve something similar to this one and as a result of this amplification the output will be in sync with this. So you will see the voice in exactly the same way as your transmission comes in. But amplitude will be higher, which means you will hear something because otherwise the signal is very very weak, whatever you're getting from antennae. It's a very weak signal. It can't really drive the speaker. The speaker is supposed to have certain additional power and that's what additional power is. It actually gives the strength to this signal while being completely in sync because as this thing is changing the flow of electrons is obviously changing as well. So that's why we have the same synchronousness between input and output. But the output is stronger because this battery can be strong. Well, basically that's it. Again, this is a kind of idea based on vacuum tubes, etc. This is how the first triodes, the first amplifiers were actually made. And I'm well, I don't know if I can say it lucky enough or not because I remember working with computers of the first generation, which were made with vacuum tubes. Then little later the semiconductor came. And obviously all these diodes and triodes, they have their equivalent in semiconductors, which I will describe maybe a little later when we will talk about semiconductors. But again, it's different implementation of the same idea. So basically that's the the only thing which I wanted to talk about today. This is just an introduction into a very, very simple electronic schema. So you have just some basic understanding of how all these smart devices, including televisions, computers, whatever else, are arranged inside. Okay, that's it for today. Thank you very much. I do suggest you to read notes for this lecture on theunizor.com. And they have some better pictures than this one, I hope. And good luck. Thank you.


Everybody forced here. I'm ripping it 20 22 absolute baseball hobby five bucks number 23 random team style I'm gonna leave the results on screen for you. I dropped you a Lincoln chat as well So you can all you can find it there. Hey guys always check the website for results if you miss them always there guys appreciate it Let's get started Jackson and Bieber First hits going to the Rangers. It's an absolute ink shared to an Apostle 111 of 199 Chas McCormick dual Jersey rookie out of 184 of 199 Stroh's Cubs rookie Jersey Greg Deekman numbers 172 of 299 Mickey Mantle purple 11 to 25 Speaking of there is you guys purple Mickey Mantle Yankees There's a trade turner extreme team Dodgers numbered 60 of 149 Brady singer rookie patch card 89 of 99 Royals Or not rookie I guess doesn't have Ricky logo on it. He was last year. That's right. That's right Redemption for the rays wonder Franco tools of the trade three swatch signatures spectrum red raise wonder franco rats Jimmy Fox red Sox 74 of 149 be down Bruhan rookie class raise 34 of 149 Raise Brandon loud Jersey card 60 of 99 reds TJ Fridl material booklet signatures 21 of 35 There you go Reds TJ Fridl there Joey Votto red for the Reds 75 of 99 Yeah, I want a redemption in both breaks. He's not going tonight. Josiah gray Washington rookie numbered 934 of 999 Gabriel Arias dual our triple Jersey auto 46 of 75 Cleveland Patrick Mazzica rookie dual Jersey auto Mets 25 of 199 D-backs Carson Kelly dual Jersey 74 of 199 Piazza as a met 177 of 199 on big books. Come on. Oh, there's a kaboom coming. There's an Aaron judge. Oh Very nice It is a rookie kaboom O'Neill Cruz Kaboom Congrats pirates There we go kaboom. He's got Pittsburgh Nam cue congrats Nam cue Shane boss 308 of 999 raise rookie David Peterson dual Jersey auto Mets 117 of 199. It's nice a Spencer Strider Wood relic auto 50 of 50 for Atlanta Good box here nice strider. Good mini box actually Aristides Aquino triple Jersey 190 of 199 reds Mariners Robbie Ray 3 of 99. It's got a book coming now Matt Manning rookie class Tigers 85 of 149 a Marlins dual Jersey Edward Cabrera 6-0 Sanchez 158 of 199 Jose Siri mariners 73 of 99 on the dual materials signature silvering there for you Astros Go astros doing well now Gold for the Braves Matt Olson's three of 10. There you go Braves gold very nice My lot of Matt Wilson Braves cards out there. All right two more boxes here and again everybody dual case Time and icons and definitive is the last break that we've got to fill tonight Wilson Catrera's cubs 14 of 149 statistically speaking Orioles dual relic Logan or no Giants dual relic Giants Logan Webb Joey Bart 29 of 49 Four color patch on the bar and a one of one book is TJ Fridle for the Reds Dual mr. Red Patch auto that is freaking awesome Chris B from the Lone Star State Chris B from Texas. There you go, buddy one of one. That's pretty sick That's awesome. I'm gonna take a picture of that real quick That's dope Sean'll get that put away. Let me take a picture of that freaking awesome, man. Congrats on that Got read for Cleveland Shane Bieber 66 of 99 Yeah, it's kind of creepy as well. It's really cool, but also kind of creepy, right? I mean mr. Red is only a little a little terrifying Just a little bit He seems friendly, but what goes on behind well when there's not a game going on, you know tonight on 60 minutes I'm Brandon Marsh rookie for the Angels 601 of 999 Drew waters tools of the trade dual patch auto Braves 24 of 75 Jake Meyers triple relic Astros rookie auto 11 of 50 Hodges raise Joe Musgrove Jersey card 107 to 299 that is a Astros Jersey there is the show is before Mariners Robbie Ray 51 of 149 Last box all the mascots sleep with their eyes open, you know, I never thought about that. No, I'm Dude, but I just think about like gritty or like the Philly fanatic all any of the Philly mascots actually Rookie Red Sox Jaren Durand 71 of 999 Twins Joe Ryan quad Jersey rookie auto 66 of 199 there you go 20s Mike Bowman triple Jersey rookie auto 136 of 199 Baltimore Take it in the game Sports Anthony K. Dual Jersey blue jays 83 of 199 red Sox Jimmy Fox 55 of 149 Fox for the socks Alrighty, there is a Mookie Betts by storm Dodgers insert 60 or 87 of 99 A's Christian posh a triple relic one oh eight 108 of 199. Yeah, A's Nationals 16 to 50 rookie dual relic auto Josiah Gray on the book Nolan Aronato Cardinals blue 93 of 149 and Some base cards One sec. We'll do a recap here Relic cards first A's Christian Pashé blue jays Anthony K Got Padres Joe Musgrove Giants Logan Webb Joey Bartz Marlins Edward Cabrera 6-0 Sanchez Reds Aristides Aquino d-backs Carson Kelly raised Brandon Lau Royals Brady Singer and Cubs Greg Deekman Auto is here Orioles Mike Bowman Twins Joe Ryan Astros Jake Myers Braves Drew Waters Braves Spencer Strider Mets David Peterson Cleveland Gabriel Arias Mets Patrick Mazzica got raised redemption tools of the trade three swatch signature spectrum That is wander Franco nice Houston Chas McCormick and Rangers shared an apostle and books here We had nach Josiah Gray 16 of 50 dual relic auto book Astros Jose Siri dual auto book That's Reds TJ Fridl. This is to 99 on this one. I think or 65 This is the one of one TJ Fridl for the Reds right here The dual mr. Met patch auto one of one book congrats again Reds Chris B. Texas And kaboom for the Pirates rookie O'Neill cruise Nice cruise kaboom Thanks again everybody more baseball coming up next


They offered me Ace Ventura, one of those, because it was a script that was just floating around. This producer came and he said, well, maybe you and Rob, but who's that dude from SNL who's really conservative? Yeah, Rob Schneider. I was like, no, I passed on it. Jim took it and said, I'm going to do what I'm going, you know, I'm going to put this out. Yeah, everything. He really was like a cancer patient. And he said, sir, you're dying in six months. Because you're the only shot. Roll and action. I sat next to him at the premiere and I felt so bad for Jim because, you know, nobody's going to see this crazy movie. We used to kid each other and I said, Jim, if I ever win the lottery, I'm going to give you $5 million. And we would play around so you could make your movie.   So I said, I want you to do that. Okay, do that. If I ever win the lottery, this is going on. That's what he did, basically. He made Colin Man. No, yeah, Ace Ventura. There was a point where I think, what was the love interest? What's her name? From friends. Courtney Cox. Yeah, they were there. And I was like, Jim had been so crazy.  I said, okay, this is Jim's gonna be normal now. What do you mean, he went. And I was like, oh my God, oh my God. So I came out, I saw Chris Rock in the lobby. This was at the same screening at Westwood. And I said, man, Chris, I don't know what I'm gonna do, man, I feel bad for Jim, but I'm gonna support him because I was laughing. He was so nervous, he was crawling out of his seat. But nobody's gonna see this movie. It's too crazy. I just thought, this is too crazy for America. Chris put his hand on my shoulder like an older brother. He said, no one, David, is going to see this movie. Oh, listen to me. Exactly, I said, okay, I'm not crazy. And you know what happened next? Yes. It blew up. Over 27 million dollars. It blew up. And I forgot, Jim was on Howard Stern and he was saying like the next day, you know, that next week, we were back doing in living color and we would come out and play with the audience and stuff. And he described how I came out there. And I was like, you know, doing a whole bit, like a Jim's movie open last week. And I just wanna say good luck, you know.  You know, so no anger here. You heard the Mooney, or not George Wallace and Jerry Seinfeld, Fortune Teller story been confirmed by both of them. They drive out here from New York, literally in like a Ford LTD. They're here, they're on Melrose. It's 1977, neither of them are, they're both been doing stand-up two, three years. Go to a Fortune Teller and Fortune Teller looks at George Wallace's hand and is like, or a palm reader and says, why you're gonna be very, very rich, right?  Next one up, Jerry Seinfeld, looks at Jerry's hand and goes, I thought you were gonna be rich. Oh, my life is more like this. As wrong as I was about Jim Carrey's movie, oh, I auditioned for Seinfeld. And I came away like, whoa, this sucks, number one. Jerry can't act this way.  Jerry can't act as we out of a paper bag, good luck. And wrong again. We saw him on Benson. Right, right. But the historical society's coming to dinner, got some great jokes the governor can use. You wanna hear him?  Please, I'm a Currie. Then go Currie. Wrong again.  It was numerology. So he does my wife's numbers like, wow. Well, you know what? There's a lot of struggle. A lot of issues. It looks very dark for you now, but you're gonna make it out and there'll be some daylight in a few years, something like that. Tied right in her story. She gets to me and she goes, same thing. Wow, you are, I've never seen numbers like this. You haven't even come into your own. She said, you're probably gonna start really coming into your career and your fame and your fortune when you're 33. I was like, really? And we get... How old are you at this point? 30. Oh, okay. Something like that. Just wait it out. We get in the gypsy camp to go home and she was crying. We just fought for two days. Yeah, because I got a better reading. Yeah. Well, there you go. You got it. Sure. Did she get half of the 33-year-old money? She got half or whatever that money I got. Okay. And we've built back since then. Fantastic. Yeah, and I hope she's happy. But wait, what did George Wallace do? Was he an insurance salesman? He had some straight job. I can't remember. Like an accountant. Yeah, for a while. Dude, when I started going on the road, I think it was Indianapolis, something like that. I come into this club.   I'm not doing three shows, because I went through that and I get burned out.  The last one. Exactly. Have you ever been on, this happened to me, where you tell a joke and it's like, did I already tell you that, Joe? All the time. Oh my God. Anyway, they said George Wallace- As bad as my concussion is? I can't remember.  This is what the chick said. George Wallace was doing six shows a day. They started it two in the afternoon. And between shows, he would have dinner at the bar and talk to people the whole time. As they were coming in. The most affable guy, literally energized by the presence of people, loves comedy, came to see me in Atlanta last time I was there. A fantastic guy. I love George, but I could never ever do that. Of course not, but that's just, that's personality-wise. Yes. Hey, did you like that? Did you like that? Yeah, did you like it though? You want more? Don't wanna work? Would rather watch videos of me grab acid with people?  This is like when the weatherman says that there's a high pressure system coming in. I'm a little, I'm not really used to the green screen.


Alright you guys so this is part two of relentless so we have Mina who has a one o'clock showing for Paul girl No, I one o'clock showing for Paul and before she decides to head out to This particular estate. She has a couple of paperwork. You know pieces of paperwork from the previous week that she just needs to Find a follow way like excuse me before she goes out to meet him. Okay, so she looks over all so The details of this particular estate. It sits on three acres It's a fairly large state in this old it actually had been listed for a couple of months And so I'm built in the early 50s five bedrooms three and a half baths And it also has a little guest house in the back. So Typically, you know people who are moving into the area like to get the newer Properties and so she found it kind of odd that someone coming all the way from LA was interested in this particular lot So anyway, Mina just as her, you know, make sure she looks okay and well put together Even though she gained a couple of pounds, but mama's wearing it. Well, alright So she heads out to this estate you guys and it's almost going outside of their little town Which is another you know, so Mina goes ahead and heads out to the estate and before she jumps into her car She looks down and she sees that she has a text message from her girl Courtney want to know if they're still on for tonight. And so Mina takes her back real quick. It said absolutely girl It's my big three. Oh, I will be there. Okay, so Mina is feeling a little sad because unfortunately her husband Quinton cannot make her her birthday party. He's out of He's out of town for a business trip.  So anyway, y'all Mina's going ahead and meeting Paul out here So she arrives a little early looks around. She see he hasn't arrived yet She goes ahead and goes inside of the house and she's you know, making sure that things are wiped down And she has cleaners to come in every week for this particular property Just to make sure everything is spick and span and nothing needs to you know, really be Updated so a couple of minutes later.  She's like, hmm. That's an interesting car for Whatever so she looks and she sees this man very handsome tall gentlemen step out of the charger with a salt and pepper beard Oh Girl, yes boards cool drawing aged well, honey. So Even though Mina has been happily married to Quentin. She still notices when someone's attracting. She's like, hmm Interesting so he smiles at her and starts walking up towards the house and you know, he's like Mina She's like, yes. Hi. It's nice to meet you. Mr. Winthrop and and then she stopped herself She said it's nice to meet you Paul because remember he said call me Paul. Don't be calling my old ass, mister I Anyway, y'all cuz remember Paul is in the palace in his early 50s He's like 50 at this point and Mina's turning 30 girl 20 year age difference with Paul is looking. So anyway, y'all sorry So I mean it's like well, it's nice to meet you How was your flight and I understand that she flew in from LA just a couple of days ago He's like actually I flew in last night. She's like, wow, you already want to view something. He's like, well, yeah I really want to go ahead and move out here as soon as possible I'm you know finalizing some business deals back in LA and I just want to you know Go ahead and move out here and get started. Well, let's go ahead and get you started then So she starts to tour.   So, you know, how do you like it? He's like, well If everything is nice, I may have to have a little bit more Work done in the front of the house, but you know, I like it I know that we have another viewing and a couple more days. So, you know Let's wait till we can view that particular lot and then from there We'll continue from there and you know mean it's like absolutely. So they're making small chit chat and She heads down, you know, she goes down and so they're making just small chit chat And so that's when Mina says, okay, well, then I'll give you a call before we do the next view In any three more days. He's like, okay, great. It was nice to meet you finally She's like it's nice to meet you as well.  She works a little bit You know doesn't have a lot to do because like I said, she's really hasn't been showing any Having any viewings lately because it's just been that slow in her and their particular area So she goes ahead and goes over to her big mama house to pick up Um the baby What is her name y'all Zuri grump.  She's like, you don't even have to ask me, baby.   Okay So Mina goes ahead and goes home and she relaxes She's not meeting up with kourtney for a few hours later like around nine o'clock and she doesn't even get off work to five So she's just relaxing around seven or so. She decides to get ready You know, she does her hair. She puts in a really nice cute tight black dress Hugging all the right places girl.  All right, y'all sorry about that. I have to take a break girl So it's been a while a minute. So anyway, um Mina decided to go ahead and meet up with her girlfriend Kourtney at the lounge to help celebrate her 30th birthday big 3o and you know, kourtney sees her She's like hey birthday girl and she gives her friend a hug and they start to catch up on things It's been a minute since she's seen kourtney. So um kourtney is actually engaged to be married but Mina's kind of surprised because she thought kourtney would be the type to just you know Be okay with being single but she finally met someone and she's engaged to be married So anyway, they're catching up having drinks and all of a sudden Mina goes to the bathroom She's like she excuse herself to go to the bathroom as she's coming out as she's walking out of the restaurant She's really not looking where she's going And so she's adjusting her dress and that's when she accidentally runs into Guess who it should be while he's making his way to the man's restroom It is mr. Paul one thought chow and he's like, um, I'm so sorry And that's when he looks up and when he recognizes who it is. He's like Mina.  It's just like She's like and she kind of blushes and she's like, oh, thank you. She's like, you know, he's like, well, what are you All dressed up for you know being nosy girl nosy and messy So she goes ahead and says what it's my birthday party. You know, I'm turning to big 3o So I'm here with my best friend kourtney and we're just celebrating together And he's like, oh a beautiful woman like you shouldn't be alone on your birthday Chow and Mina's kind of taking a bag by that She's like, well, actually my husband is away on a business trip and you know We're hoping to celebrate when he arrives in town in a few more weeks and that's when paul You know, he's like, well, I'm sorry. I don't mean any disrespect I just meant like that a attractive young woman like you shouldn't have to spend her birthday alone He said well, anyway, let me not hold you up. Happy birthday and take care I'll see you in a couple more days. She's like that's right. See you in a couple more days so she makes her way to the um To her chair and guess who's looking at her Kourtney child court is like, um I mean, it's like, yeah, she's like, who was mr. Salt and pepper. You don't think I didn't see that. I'm gonna explain that is her client and she was showing him a A house earlier in the day That's when a bartender. Excuse me. The waiter comes over and hands her a drink and meaning was like I didn't order this and that's when she looked over and said well Actually, the gentleman at the bar ordered you the drink and so Mina looked around and see and she doesn't see anyone But sure enough, she knows it was Paul but Paul had went ahead and left the actual lounge girl by this time so Courtney was like, huh? Seems like more than just the client to me.  I just met him today and he I told him it was my birthday and he just ordered me a drink I guess so they go ahead and continue celebrating her birthday there Mina, you know, it's getting tired. So she says goodbye to Courtney.  So she gets the baby at the car seat Walk into the house and she noticed that there are um There and she notices that there are flowers Everywhere in the living room and that's when Quentin walks in through the kitchen area and he's like happy birthday, baby He had ordered her 30 dozen of red roses y'all for her birthday and she was so excited. She rent runs to him Um, the baby runs to him and she's surprised.  Paul Winthrop This is part two y'all. We're gonna drag this one out too


the social economic rites, and accountability project practitioner has gone to court to seek an order of mandamus to direct and compel the senneth presentation God's will There are budgeted for 465 SUVs and bullet-proof cars for their members. Sarah Pupu joined us this morning to throw more light on this, on the breakfast. They say it takes two to tango. This is even more so when it comes to making babies. But a situation where single mothers are made to carry the burden alone has become worrisome, especially as it seems there are no specific laws to address this. So this morning we'll be looking at the need of mandating fathers to provide child support. We'll also be having off the press where we'll take a look at the major headlines that made it to the front pages of some national dealings. This morning our analyst is ready to tear them apart as always. Good morning and welcome to the breakfast. I am Maureen Menonwiesi. I am Nyamgul Agadji. We sincerely apologise for beginning a little bit late but we do hope that you're still going to have a wonderful time being with us this morning. Well, this morning promises to be very, very interesting and we're talking about some things that you might be able to relate with, some that you might want to hear. Like we're talking about what is happening in the National Assembly and the challenge they are getting and also what happens at the family front where some people just abandon their children because of a divorce, because of whatever the reason is but some people become single mothers and then not only are they single mothers but they are made to take the entire burden of raising these children. So no matter how good the person might be, how comfortable the woman might be, whoever is also responsible for the children should contribute in some way to the raising of these children. Yes, child abandonment is a major thing in the world today but even worse so in Nigeria because we know what happens in some of the climes where child support is taken seriously by the government so the father in the picture is made to take responsibility and pay certain some mandatory to the woman for the upkeep of the children but here in Nigeria it's not the case, it's not the case the men, a lot of men abandon their children and leave everything to the woman to just cater to the needs of the poor children and so because in this part of the world they believe that at the end of the day the children will always look for their father so they just roam around and at the end of the day children actually do look for their fathers right but then what does that say about you as a man no matter what you are no matter how successful you claim to be if you are an irresponsible father if you failed in the home front you are a total failure where else the Bible says you are worse than any infidel you cannot provide for your family no matter what the reason for the separation might be whether it was bitter or whether it was sweet whether it was mutually agreed upon the children had no say in it as it is for them to suffer what was the problem between you and the woman it doesn't make real sense to me but anyway when we are looking at this thing we will be looking at both ways though because when we say some fathers are not responsible we should also know that some mothers are not responsible so whoever contributed to making a baby should also contribute to sustaining that baby yes even though today we are taking a look at specifically and getting the fathers to support the children financially getting them to support the children financially because we know the rates are higher if you want to compare single mothers to single fathers the rates are higher you find more single mothers than you would find single fathers and then of course we also know that men are usually more economically sound in most cases than women I haven't said anything because sometimes you find a situation where the women had to give up their careers to just stay home for some time make the babies for both of them unfortunately the marriage fails so she has to start all over to build her life and also then double up and act as both mother and father so it's a very dire situation for the mothers involved so it's a very serious matter that we are going to be taking a look at today and hopefully the government in the country I'm not talking about federal now government across states across the country would take up this battle and make sure because if the family fails the society fails and we're seeing so many ills in our societies today and if you look critically you may not be so far-fetched from the homes where the homes are failing so much these days the rate of divorce cases on the increase and you wonder how did our parents do it how did they manage to hold it together well that would be a matter for another day but today let's just look at what the top trending is you might want to take the first one yes Kano revokes license of all private schools in the states the government says certificates of all private schools operating in the state have been revoked with immediate effect and special advisor to the governor on private and voluntary institutions Baba Abubaka Umar announced the decision at a meeting with the proprietors of the private schools Umar said all the schools are expected to collect new registration forms to fill for new certificates to be issued he said the move was part of the state government's comments towards commitment towards sanitizing the operations of private schools and to ensure adherence to established laws and guidelines he charged the proprietors to pay their 10% tax to the government and as it went due for the progress of the sector adding that he's returned to the position of managing the private schools should not spark fears saying he's not out to victimize anyone and speaking on behalf of the proprietors the chairman national association of private school owners Karnosti chapter Mohammed Malam Adamu described the move as fantastic and commendable as it will further boost the education sector in the state what are they going to do when the people come back to re-register that they cannot do when they are still there and sanitize the whole thing why wouldn't they just say they want to make more revenue because that's what I'm thinking about if there is anyone that is not complying with whatever laid down rules they are close it down and let others be or give them time and say after XYZ time we're going to close you down if you don't comply with this but you have to take all their certificates and then they will re-register yeah so it tells you something else okay the second one is that the IG that's the inspector general of police is to establish a special intervention squad he's acting inspector general of police anyway he has not been confirmed yet and he has announced plans to establish a special intervention squad to deal with security threats in the country he disclosed this when he let the police force management team on a curtsy call to governor Abad Yusuf of Kano state on Saturday at government house he saw the support from the Kano state government in order to drive this process to succeed because he said Kano is one of the pilot states and Abad Yusuf said that the need for the new squad could not be overemphasized as its success would depend on the cooperation and support the police got from the Kano state government okay so now he's calling it a special intervention squad and I don't know is there anything in the name because will it be different from the SARS that brought the problems of N SARS whenever there is a special intervention squad it is the same orientation they give to them you are special you need to do this yes they do the work but sometimes they overstep and that's why we had extrajudicial killings that's why we had unlawful detentions that's why we had what some people felt was witch hunt and all that and then you are just young you have braided hair or you have a tattoo you are being arrested and all those kind of things so what much difference will this special intervention squad have from the SARS that people cried about I guess one can just but only hope that they've learnt from the SARS story and experiences and all that came out from the shortcomings from that squad and that they will reorientate these set of special squads to do better having experienced the SARS tragedy I mean police should be police there are the people who should be trained who are trained supposedly to be able to relate with the civilian population so they should have better social skills they should have better intelligence gathering and all that so that they stop harassing people because that was the bone of contention you don't see me they say you can't judge a book from its cover you just see me how I look and I fit the profile that you think I should fit and then you start to harass me special intervention squads are good but let them stop overstepping if that can be done even if they want to have ten of them I am for it but they have special rapid response squad they have someone other squads what is special about the special squad that others cannot do we are not the police we just need them to be our friend as we have been told that they are or you are watching the breakfast we will be back to give you off the press stay with us


Hello there, this is a video going over some games that I think make good use of the Super Nintendo mouse. Some people are under the impression that the mouse is only good for like 3 or 4 games, but click the link in the description to see a plethora of other games that make good use of it. This is not a definitive video, just a few games I like that aren't particularly well known that make good use of the mouse accessory. If I were to do a full video of every SNES mouse game, this video would be like 25 minutes long. No thanks. Back from the Racquetboy forums for the idea for this video. Of course, everyone knows about Mario Paint, which remains a fun game if you have a really young child. Really, if you have a toddler that wants to get into video games, start them out with Mario Paint, I say. It should be noted though that this game isn't just painting, like it's Microsoft Paint on Super Nintendo, you can create stamps, looping animations, and your own soundtrack. There's also a fly swatting game called Nat Attack, which is self-explanatory. Mario and Wario came out for the Super Famicom, but never made it to the United States for whatever reason. It's all in English though, so no translation worries. It's a very simple puzzle game, and its appeal is to keep going just to see how far you can get, really. But it makes very efficient use of the mouse, there's three different difficulty settings or speeds. The game starts really easy, but can get somewhat complicated the further you play. Mario's Super Peacross is yet another Super Famicom game, although this one is on the Wii U Virtual Console in Europe. This one takes a little while to get the hang of. Pretty much drawing a picture, like a stamp in Mario Paint, but with gameplay like Minesweeper. The numbers on the sides determine how many blank spaces there should be, so you chisel away the appropriate spaces, and also marking the ones you don't hit, like bombs and minesweeper. You're also timed, and if you make a mistake, you get time taken away from you. However, in the Wario themed levels, the time counts up from zero, and you're not told if you make a mistake. This game is hard, but it's pretty interesting. Pieces is a game I don't think it's recommended often enough, either as a puzzle game or as a multiplayer game. Yeah, on the surface you're literally just solving a jigsaw puzzle, and the goal is to solve it faster than your opponent. But what makes this game fun is all the special items that either help you or screw with your opponent. Like inverting their controls, or clearing their board entirely, or freezing their mouse cursor. There's a strong chance you and your opponent will hate each other after playing this game. Taking on more of a platforming slant is Trottlers, where your job is to lead these little creatures around the screen to the exit. There's a limited number of blocks for you to use to build a way to get them out, so you can get to the next mission. There's also a time limit that you have to beat, which is always at least a few minutes. The missions, however, can vary in objectives.  There's also different kinds of blocks you can use, some of which are deadly to normal Trottlers, but unlike Lemmings, Trottlers has kind of a platformer aspect. You control your main character and move him around the screen to get stuff done. But you can use the mouse as well, which is really much easier. There's 99 levels, and the game really gets complicated as it goes along. Arkanoid Do It Again came out very, very late in the Super Nintendo's run, so it was widely ignored on its initial release. And you probably know what Arkanoid is, so I'll just say that this has got to be the best version of Arkanoid I've ever played, including the version on the TI-81 calculator I had in Math Class. This game even has a story, which seems needless. I mean, it's Arkanoid, but it's still pretty amusing. There's 99 levels, plus an editing mode to create your own levels, kind of like Excitebike for NES. And this game allows for two players. How can you beat that? Overall, the game is very clean and very smooth, especially with the mouse, and it's one of the best puzzle games on the Super Nintendo. Switching gears a bit, there's Nobunaga's Ambition, a classic turn-based strategy game that got ported to several other systems. The story takes place during Feudal Japan, and your goal is pretty straightforward, just conquer everything. There's four campaign scenarios where you need to create a decent enough military force to carry out your orders. Each turn on the overall map is a season change, but each turn during battle is only a day. So the game really requires you to be patient as you build up your forces. Pardon the pun, but this is a very ambitious game for its time. And it's a little clunky and vague as to what to do at times. But the Super Nintendo Mouse makes this game so much more accessible. It's just a pain to play these kind of games with a D-pad. So if you ever wanted to dive into any of those Koei strategy games, and there's a lot of them, the first one I'd recommend is Nobunaga's Ambition, with the Super Nintendo Mouse. For a change of pace, there's Shien's Revenge, a first-person arcade-style shooter that's pretty damn challenging.  You can slash and block with your knife and throw ninja stars. Anyway, I wanted to point out Shien's Revenge because it's a great example of a game that's ridiculous to play with a controller, but way more playable with a mouse. If you want the same kind of gameplay, but a bit darker and with automatic weapons, there's T2, the arcade game. Now, this was awesome in the actual arcade because you had this ginormous gun to shoot with, so on the Super Nintendo, the game's kind of lackluster to say the least, but at least with the mouse, the game is actually not that bad. It's pretty one-dimensional, though, but if you're into these kind of games, play it with the mouse. If you like the point-and-shoot arcade-style games, but with a little more levity and a touch of sunset riders, there's Tin Star. This game embraces its ridiculous nature with a cartoony vibe that almost reminds me of Earthworm Gym at times. There's a bit more variety here with some mini-games, and once again, I gotta stress the game is way better with the mouse. Not that it's that great to begin with, but it's a fun way to spend an hour. Anyway, that's all for now. Thanks for watching, and I hope you have a great rest of your day.