in working for Intel 10 years and worked many open source projects and products during past years, recent years, I am working on cloud native related projects like Intel Kubernetes device plugins, resource management, Cata containers and cloud hypervisor open source project. Before Intel, I worked for several companies, mainly worked on Linux and Android system development. Today, I'm going to talk about NRI, which is node resource interface, which is a common plugins mechanism to extend container runtime, such as container in CRIO. Let me spend a little time to talk about what NRI is. Not everyone know NRI clearly, but I believe you know resource management, Kubernetes goes, container life cycle and CRI. NRI is not a new concept. NRI is a sub project of Conya nerd. Now NRI work is an evolution based on that. The original design and implementation of NRI v1 were contributed by Apple, but the functionality is very limit and its scalability is not very good because it can only be applied to the container runtime. However, its design and innovation are quite good. So the NRI work I mentioned here, which refers to NRI v2 work, which is intended to create a universal runtime extension standard API, which is not only to supports container, but also can be applied to CRIO. Through this standard API, users have opportunity to inject additional logic into runtime with important container events, triggering such as container creation, update, deletion, et cetera, or user can dynamically adjust container configurations during container running. NRI is a CRI plugin located in the container architecture, which provides a plugin framework for managing node resources at the container runtime level. NRI can be used to solve performance issues in batch computation, sensitive workloads and meet user needs, such as service SLA slash SLO and workload priority. For example, high performance workload needs to ensure memory access within a NUMA node, also by allocating the CPU of the container to the same NUMA node is vital. Of course, in addition to NUMA node alignment, there is also resource topology affinities such as CPU core and L3 cache. NRI is target for resource management and container runtime level. NRI patches are merged into container 1.7 release already. NRI is a plugin. NRI is the highway. What is running on it really depends on what we want. Now, let's see the regular CRI request processing in a Kubernetes environment. As we see, the core of the CRI mechanism is that each container project can implement a CRI shim and process CRI requests. In this way, a Kubernetes has a unified container abstraction layer, which allows lower containers to integrate and connect easily when running. However, OCI level runtime, which needs to input OCI spec, OCI spec has information about which device is a container to use in lots of other parameters. Those are only visible at OCI runtime level. So, the key part here is that the container runtime to translate it from Kubernetes way to details of OCI runtime level. Here you should know that OCI container have more than 40 parameters or fields, but the CRI protocol has 15 or 20 fields only. This means if you want to enable like Intel RDT cache slash memory control, it is part of OCI spec. It can be configured at OCI level. The CRI protocol does not know anything about it. This is why we design and contribute NRI into community. Now, let's see what it looks like after integrated NRI. NRI include three parts, NRI adoption, NRI plugins and NRI protocol. NRI adaptation needs to be built on each runtime, but the plugins develop once and run everywhere. There are some internal differences between Creo and Container. The NRI protocol is a single repository that is used by Creo and Container. I mentioned already, NRI allows user to inject a third party logic into a container runtime, which is compatible with OCI, such as Contianert and CRIO this way, which allows for taking over containers or performing operations outside of OCI at certain time points in the container lifecycle. For example, it can be used to optimize the resource allocation, device management and other container resources. NRI defines node resource interfaces and implements a common basic library to support this pluggable runtime extension, name the NRI plugins. Look at the CRI request flow, information is passed down to a plugin and plugin replies to container runtime after applying resource policies. Here the key part is the safety connection created inside the interface. NRI allows to deploy plugins as a Kubernetes demon set. The plugin then connects to NRI socket. It has access to network, API server, et cetera. It can use the normal Kubernetes client. One of the plugins goal is to simplify the Kubernetes block. Also, advantage of OCI level is that new features integration does not need to touch everything. For example, Intel RDT implemented in OCI spec six years ago, but still not exposed to the upper layer now. Okay, now you know what the NRI is and how it works, but how to write an NRI plugin. It's simple, just clone the NRI plugin template, fill in the missing details, then implement data collection. If you wanna know more detail and create yourself NRI plugins, please take a look at those links. They are NRI design and PR for container and CRIO. Also, there are two plugins implemented by Intel. You can refer to and learn about it. Finally, I wanna call for actions. If you are interested in NRI, please join community to discuss and contribute. Also encourage you practice and develop your NRI plugins for your services. This is all what I shared today. Thank you. Back to our sharing. Ten minutes. I'd like to share three points with you. First, who am I? Let's get to know each other and make friends. Why do I have to use this method in this video? Because there are a lot of content. If I'm wrong, I probably need to save you 20 minutes. So I would like to take five minutes to talk about what I want to share with you. The most important thing is to get to know each other and make friends. My name is Yang Ai-Ling. I'm in Intel. I've been working for IT for 20 years. I've been developing various systems and products for the past 15 years. For example, Linux, Android, mobile phones, and TV. I've been working on this cloud for the past five years.  I've been working on OCTRACION, as well as all kinds of equipment and resources. Why do I have to use this method? Because my voice is not so good. Some of you have been listening to my technical session this afternoon. It's pretty easy to get tired. So I don't want to use my voice and give you a break for another 15 minutes. So I use artificial intelligence. Don't you know what artificial intelligence is? It's a process that makes my voice sound. So I've been training for five minutes. Yes, that's right. So let's get to know each other. In the future, or in our circle, we might meet at another event or a customer meeting. This is the first one. I'd like to share it with you. We have a friend who knows me. I'm Yang Erlin. The second thing is what I've shared with you. You've probably heard what I've shared in the last five minutes. It's called N-I. I don't think I've done a lot of research because I've done less research. I've done a lot of research on cloud development. Because in the community, I often look at our country and see who does PR. So at least I haven't seen too many people who do PR in the community. In the global KBS community, we have two Chinese companies and one is the main company, Daokla and Huawei. I have a lot of other companies. So I haven't seen you do PR. I don't want to share the product. This is a community-based community. It's where we discuss technology. We discuss the community and the community. So I didn't include the product. I didn't include any product recommendation. Let's go back to what N-I-S is. Just now, a few teachers have said a lot of things about cloud programming, the management of resources, or the programming of the GPU, the resources of the GPU, etc. But I want to share with you why there's N-I. In fact, KBS has been here for so many years. It's relatively mature and stable. So in the process of application, basically there's no big problem with programming. But in fact, when you meet the first two controls after me, when I developed a lot of new things for KBS, it's hard for me to contribute. Or it's hard for me to be accepted by the KBS community. The reason is that our innovation is relatively mature and stable. Your patch is not easy to be accepted. Or in the process of application, these mentors will be very strict. And the time is very long. So when you want to do some innovation and develop, it's relatively difficult. It's relatively difficult. This is one. Second, in the actual application process, in fact, when your application can run, your stability is no longer a problem. Or your backup is done. In fact, there's still a big challenge.  That is to say, in the process of application, we often find that the cost of my unit is not high. Or I have to do everything to increase the cost of my unit. But in the process of my unit, I can't achieve it. Because the unit always fails. Because of the cost. So back to KBS, you may not be able to see the cost management. But in fact, in the process of development, when you face your application every day, when you deploy your workload, you will meet two things, the request limit. This is what most people meet. Because these two words are often an invisible KOS. That is to say, your workload is in the process of deployment. There is a KOS requirement. But this KOS is an invisible thing. There are some differences. It's a set of things. It defines its KOS class. That is to say, your application can show what kind of class I am in. It is a high priority or low priority. You can do it. But in fact, after months, in the entire deployment process, there are many details of the deployment. You can't do it. For example, we are going to do a恐怖. The limit. Or the limit. Or a big one with artificial intelligence. A big one with a large consumption of resources. Or a恐怖 with an online thing. Or a high priority. A low priority. Or a high priority. Or a恐怖 with an online thing. My support for deployment is serious. Or my support for isolation is not guaranteed. So in this community, or in every field, we all have our own ways. But if you want to put these things into the community, be accepted or ignored, or you have to go through it yourself, meet the two challenges. One is that the community can't be accepted. The other is that during your maintenance, your every generation of products will be upgraded with KBIOS. This cost is very high and very painful. So in the community, there is a new way, which is NRI, which is not Results Interface. This method is in container DJI, which is a new API in the wrong time level. This kind of API is that you can achieve your own policy on the basis of not destroying KBIOS. For example, if you have a way to control your resources, you can perform a plug-in method. Then it's a good thing. If you want to promote the process, you can perform a device plug-in with a policy of good resources. So this NRI is mainly in container DCIO. In the wrong time level, if you have this support, you can finish your own device plug-in and then you can deploy it in a demonetized way. So not destroying your own ecosystem is very beneficial to its version of the plug-in. So it solved a problem. So this NRI has now become the basic API of KBIOS that supports efficient management. This is the second NRI that I shared with you today. After listening to this, you don't have to worry about details. You can go online or in the KBIOS community. But at least you know that I shared a thing that Inter did today. It's called NRI. If you are interested in it, go and see it. The third thing I want to share is that you already know something. If you are interested in it, you can go to us to find our community. Finally, join our community to communicate and develop your own Raspberry. That's all I want to share today. Thank you.


Any more information on how CeCe bounced back? He's out there stretching today now, and we'll play catch and everything. Just talking to him when he came in, said he felt good, so so far encouraging. What do you need to hear from him? What do you need to see from him for him to be on that roster for the ALCS? I think completing the bounce back today and that he is sound, we'll have some more conversations about it and try and make a good decision one way or the other here over the next 24 hours. And with Hicks, is it just a matter of being healthy, or is it a matter of you thinking he can be effective as well based on the amount of time that he's in? Yeah, it's a combo of both of those and coupled with our roster. The good thing is that he's put himself in this position to make it a decision. Obviously, as good a player as he is, that's exciting. So we'll have some tough decisions here over the next 24 hours as we work this out and what kind of makes the most sense, and we'll try and make a sound one. But he's put himself in that conversation. Kenny and Eric? Aaron, is starting Hicks in game one on the list of options? Could be, yeah. I mean, I would say he could potentially be a starter, be off the bench, not be on. I mean, I think they're all legitimately things we've got to consider and what makes the most sense for us. So we'll try and make it as good an evaluation as we can. Is part of that consideration that if it ain't broke, don't fix that idea, just how good Guardi is with the center, how good the stands at bats, and just all of that. Yeah, I mean, that certainly complicates it a little bit because we've been very successful and the guys that we have are playing really well. So that certainly complicates it and kind of the unknown because Aaron, he hasn't played in games or anything like that, and it's been a while. So the good thing is that he is healthy and put himself in that conversation. Aaron. The decisions with CeCe and with Hicks and then the other final decision is the roster. How much will that be impacted by what happens in tonight's game? It could factor in a little bit. There could be a decision based on the opponent for a spot or two. We're talking about a handful of guys for the final couple spots. And I think opponent will come into play a little bit. Meredith, do you have a question? Brian, over here to the left. Aaron, we've seen you be more aggressive this year with your bullpen. How much of that is a response to any criticism you got last year about sticking with starters too long? I mean, I kind of go into the game and go into series and try and have a blueprint or a plan in place that obviously is always fluid. And you've got to make adjustments on the fly. But just trying to do whatever to what's going to give us the best chance to win. So I don't know if it's a response to anything or just trying to be as prepared as I can be to make sound decisions. And that's ongoing. What did you make of that last year? Make of what? When people thought that you stuck with secondary bat here and persevered on too long. I always talk about baseball that a lot of decisions are gray. And sometimes you make a decision and it works out. And not necessarily the right one. But usually decisions made and certainly in the postseason are always up for debate. And that's part of it. And you kind of know that going in. And all you can do is be as prepared and as focused as you can be to try and make sound decisions to help us win. And so I don't, it's all part of it. You've used DJ at first base. Would you feel comfortable using N. Karnasio in there?  No, I'd be comfortable with Edwin at first. Feel like he's healthy and sound. Feel like he plays a pretty good first base. So yeah, that's, I would always be comfortable going that way if there was the right situation. Sweetie Passett, behind you to Marley when you're done. You've been asked a lot of questions in the last two weeks about how you have changed or what you've done better. How much are there tangible ways that your team is better than the one you took over? I'd like to think that we are better, that we're a year more mature in a lot of ways from some of our key guys. I've always, from day one that I got to spend with these guys in spring training and really starting to get to know them last year, I've always felt from a makeup standpoint we're really strong and really good. That said, I think there's another level of experience, of focus, and perhaps the biggest thing, hunger. That's one word I've used to describe these guys a lot this year. I feel like they're really hungry. And they've shown that in the most normal of days during the year and continue to show it now when these, when the stakes are really high, obviously. But I think that hunger is something this team has in a big time way. Erin, can you learn anything from watching other managers work in the post-season? Does it have to be a personal experience? I think you probably learn. I watch a lot of baseball throughout the year. Try and pay attention a little bit to what's going on. I'm certainly in the playoffs watching these games. Sometimes you sit down, you watch the whole game. Sometimes you're in and out a little bit. But hopefully you're kind of always growing from your experiences. And that's not always just as a player or as a manager in your own game. I think there's always things to be learned. And I've been in this game my entire life pretty much. And I think all the experiences you have going back to childhood and being around things, hopefully you take with you and you learn from and you grow from and adds to your level of experience. Behind Marley. Erin, defensively, compared to last year's club, do you feel like you've improved overall? And are there any specific players that have taken strides in that area that you've noticed? I do. I think game three was a big reason we won that game was our defense. And you look around the diamond, I think Labor's made huge strides this year defensively. Right now with the lineup we're running out there where you have DJ, a middle and fielder basically playing first base. Obviously a lot of talk about what Gio's meant to our club and how good he's been defensively. I think our outfields played incredibly well. As good an outfielder as Aaron Judge is, I think he's gotten better this year. I think he's had an amazing defensive year. Guardi's been terrific in center. John Carlo coming back from the knee injury, I think it's been sound in left field and then have the ability to go to cam. I feel like we're strong in a lot of ways. Gary, I feel like, continued to make big strides defensively. Didi, and as steady as he is. So I feel very confident in our defense. Feel like it played a role in us having a successful first series. Just a quick, quick follow up to that one. Defensive metrics have gotten better. They're still not great. But do you think that that's one area of the game where the eye test is still just as important as it always was? Or can you quantify it a little bit better with numbers as opposed to in the past? Yeah, I think you can quantify better. The eye test is still important. Context is still important. And those are things you hopefully are always considering when making evaluations or determinations. So we try and look at all those things. But overall, defensively, I feel like we are a better club. Aaron, it seems like young players are having more impact all over the game. And then on the other end of the spectrum, somebody like Brett Gardner playing the best baseball maybe of his career at his age. Just wondering, what have you kind of learned about Guardi just being up close with him for two years as opposed to watching him from afar? Really tough. He's a hard-nosed blue-collar old-school grinded-out player. Despite being 36, is that what he is? I mean, you look at him, he's physically very sound, very fit. Obviously still runs well and is strong and takes care of his body and has shown to be durable. So even though he's been through the rigors and gotten beat up in different ways like everyone does that plays every day, I feel like he's got a younger man's body. And in part of that, that's a gift.  Over to the left, Anthony and Dave. Aaron, what do you think of the championship belt thing that the players are doing after wins? And is it true, as reported, that you got one after the savages? I love the belt. It's been a team-building thing for us. In a way, it's created some competition. Guys want to fight for it, want to perform for it. It's fun to see teammates talk through it and have to give it out. So I think it's been something that, especially in the course of a long season, is something that adds to the camaraderie of things and even the competition of things. I got one once. I don't know. Dave. Aaron, how difficult is it in this kind of day and age, and I think last night, Dave Roberts was talking about having faith and trusting in players, and to balance that with what your game strategy says and what the numbers say and what your plan is going into the game. You have a loyal to these players, obviously, but at the same time, you have to try to do it as surgically maybe as possible. Is that a hard line to walk? That's part of the job. It's a big part of the job.  And I try and be as loyal as it comes. But I think when you communicate with people and have a relationship with people, it makes difficult decisions. I don't know about any easier, but it makes them maybe everyone understands it and at least respects it. And hopefully, we have that with this group, and I believe we do. Randy and Joe, we'll take a few more. Can you talk about the challenge that you guys would face if it's Houston that you play? And then also, if it's Tampa, if they win, they would have beaten the big three pitchers in a row. Yeah. I think both teams are great and present serious trouble, competition for us. And I know we'll have to play really well to beat both teams, whoever it ends up being. Obviously, with Tampa being in our division, we know them well. We know what makes them successful. We know how difficult it can be when you go in there. And even though we had some success against them in the regular season this year, you always know how difficult it is and how well we had to play to have that success. Obviously, with Houston, I think a lot of people would look at them as going into this postseason as kind of the odds-on favorite, really a complete team with elite starting pitching and a good bullpen and star players. And we know they're a load. So we're really excited to whoever it may end up being. And we know we'll have our work cut out for us. But I think our guys relish that opportunity.  And how do you deal with this layoff? And anything you do to kind of stay sharp and make sure that momentum carries over? Yeah, I talked about this a little bit yesterday. As a player and even looking back the last couple of years, that would always make me a little nervous, a little anxious. I completely have a different view with these guys of that. Part of the reason we wanted to win game three so bad, or I did anyway, was, man, I look forward having a few days off for these guys. Because I think it really serves them well. It really benefits them. And I think they do a great job. And I think in this day and age, it's easier to stay sharp just with facilities and things you're able to do, whether it's high speed machines and breaking balls, if you want to see that. Or going into the last series, we had some sim game situation where guys that wanted it, bats could get it, bats. So I know our guys will use this as an opportunity to kind of recover a little bit, stay fresh. And I know we'll come out and be focused. And I feel like sharp when that bell rings. Tina. Aaron, you have such a unique roster. And of course, it keeps changing depending on who's coming back and who you're going to select. But when you talk about that hunger, guys have won World Series before. Some are looking to have never been this far in the post-season. Where is that all coming from? That it seems like it's so unified, this hunger that this team has. Yeah. I think that's something that's internal with these guys. I think it's something that our leadership does a really good job of kind of living and instilling. And guys kind of get caught up and swallowed up in the culture, I think. And I think there's always a fine line between, I think we got a lot of good guys in that room that you'd want to go to dinner with or hang out with. But also a healthy dose of an edge that they play with that serves them well in the grind of a 162 game season. But also think here in the playoffs where there's so much riding on every pitch. And it's something I really think those guys have in them which is important. We'll take two more, Mike and Jack. And I guess before we go for planning purposes, Judge and Stanton will speak tomorrow, wherever we are after the workout in the interview room. And then tonight, we will send out via email after the completion of game five media outlines for what we're going to do tomorrow, as far as availability and workout times and stuff. Mike. Aaron, just in terms of the lineup that you guys have had, obviously you're going to be facing tough pitch controllers to what team you play. What kind of elements do you feel like, and Karnas Yon, Lamehue, or Shil have added to your lineup that maybe you didn't have in 2018? I think the strength in numbers that kind of completes our lineup and makes us long, you know, I think, because they're all tough outs, you know, in different kind of ways, I think when you have nine guys that are tough outs that are giving tough quality at bats, I think that's something that's served them all well as a group. And probably over the course of games, you know, eventually leads to some mistakes, eventually leads to, you know, some innings where we've really broken through. And it's not necessarily all just that inning where, you know, we threw up a crooked number or threw up a five or a six spot, you know. That happens sometimes in the innings leading up to that and the toughness and the quality of it bats. And I feel like that's what they have maybe as their biggest strength is the quality one through nine and how that can wear down in the opponent. Last one, Jack. Erin, I think we all understand that arrested bullpen is an asset, but you guys really seem to take that to a higher level with your big four in September. For instance, Chapman through 70 pitches in the month of September. I can't imagine a healthy closer contending for a postseason spot was ever used that infrequently. Can you take us behind the curtain a little bit and describe was there a voice or a series of voices or a meeting where someone said, or hey, we want these guys to be ready for October. Let's plot out the plan at the end of September in this manner. No, it actually just kind of unfolded that way a little bit in September. I mean, we were playing it straight, honestly, so there were games where Chapi's situation that we're pretty disciplined on didn't present itself. So we ended up having to get him into a couple of games just because he hadn't pitched in a handful. We were gonna, all right, he's in there today in some form or fashion. We stayed disciplined to picking a spot where we felt like a guy needed an extra day. We would do that, but in most of those games our guys were available and we were gonna bring them into their normal high leverage situation. Obviously we stay away from, during the regular season, try to stay away from the three in a row and more than three out of four and try and be mindful of that, but we didn't specifically get away from that at all. In September, I think the games just kind of went in that direction that we had some guys down more often because of the daily score of the game or the result of the game sometimes.


What's up, y'all ready for the big game tomorrow? So, Pumps, you ready? I am, let me try out 10 real quick. All right. Let's go. Let's go. All right, I'm ready. Yo, yo, yo, yo, yo, yo. Can't seem to find it, I don't have any. Cranium from the front desk and. Shit, what are you doing? Hi guys, good morning. I even brought you coffee. Oh, hey, hey, hey, guys, guys, guys, stop, stop. Anything but the face paint.  Everybody's season right now. Just wanna get away. All right, well y'all have fun. So do you. Thank you, officer. Hahaha.


Multiple myeloma is a cancer of the plasma cells found in the bone marrow. It can also spread to other parts of the body, including the central nervous system. Symptoms include bone pain, fatigue, and kidney problems. Treatment options include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and stem cell transplantation. This article was authored by Mohamed Uzair Ali, Shafak Maksud, Marek Malik, and others.


Here we have the 1v1 roulette fishing tournament. You got your boy Noah going off against Tara. Tara thinks she can take on the big boy Noah today. So we got this roulette wheel on Amazon. I know everybody uses the iPhone app, but we ain't doing the real thing today. So to show you all what baits we got, we have a crank bait, we got $20. So you win $20 if you get this one.  We got minus $20. So Tara, if you draw that, you gotta give me $20. We have the worm, we have, okay, to clarify too, we have a Sanko and a worm.  We have $100 jackpot on here. We have a fluke, and obviously the Sanko, and then another minus $20. So pretty much how this is gonna work. Me and Tara are both gonna spin it to get our first bait. So I'm gonna go ahead and get my first spin. Before we get deeper into this video, only 27% of y'all watching these videos are actually subscribed. So if you could take the time, hit the subscribe button. Really helps the channel. I'd appreciate it. Are you ready? Set, go. What do you want it for? I want a hundred bucks. I wanna get a hundred bucks. First spin, no way. Right away. Oh, minus 20 bucks, minus 20 bucks. I listen, I didn't sign up for this, but I guess you get $20. We're gonna go for another spin, boys. Let's hope you get- I think I manifested that first. Listen, I'm gonna get a hundred buck bill this time. I got a Sanko. I'll take it. I'll take a Sanko. Now it's Tara's turn to go ahead and give her a spin. Yeah. What you get? A hundred dollars. Minus 20, give that one a bad girl. Yes, sir. That is how it works in this game, boys. Give her another whip. Man, I'm doing pretty good here. You rigged it. A hundred, a hundred? Oh, no, stop, bro. Okay, there we go. Well, that's just unfair. Because this is all my money.  Is this what I do? To be fair, I got my 20 back, you know? All right, what you got? What you got?  I guess you won the 20 bucks, right? What you got? What you got? All right, let's get it. Money, money, money. You got a fluke. Okay, that's a good one. So Tara is starting off with a fluke.  Let's go ahead and get rigged up and get to fishing. Once we catch a fish on the bait, that's when we go back to the wheel and re-spin. First person to five fish wins the challenge. Boys, we got a couple of different rod options for me today. I'm going to be rocking with the Mott Crush and also a Kickin' Their Bass TV X Lose combo. If you guys want to check out the Kickin' combos, you can check them out on kickintherbass.com. I will link it down below. If you want to check out any of the losing, check the out and lose. But yeah, let's go ahead and get this started. I think I'm going to start off with the Mott Crush for my Texas rig, because I actually already have a bait rigged up. So you already got a Texas rig on and now we just got to grab our little Sanko, which I'm going to show y'all what we're going to be using. I'm excited for this video. If you guys want to see more videos like this, more challenges, or if you just want to see more challenges with me and Tara, let us know in the comment section down below. Hit the like button. Like this video up and we'll make sure we do more. So this is the Sanko that I'm using. This is actually a black and blue with a blue tip on the end. I've actually tried this bait on the river one other time and absolutely tore the fish up. So we're just going to Texas rig this. Pretty simple. Lead bullet weight, three-eye X, or actually four-eye X or Y gap hook. And that right there, boys and girls, is our first bait of the day. All right, you guys, we got the kick in their bass, spinning combo today. I'll be using this. Already have my fluke on here. So let's do it. All right, boys, let's get her active. Let's do it. Let's put old Tara in the dust today. Talking oldish. Look what you laughing at back there. You know what's going to happen. That's why you laughing. Huh? Listen, I'm just speaking through to the future. Who's going to get the first fish?  At least he ain't going negative in the bank, but I'm definitely getting the $100 bill today. Definitely happened. Oh my gosh, he ate it. I was reeling it in right behind you, Tara. Like he must have been about to put it in his mouth and he was having to eat it. What is going on? Let, oh. Yes. Oh, yes. He came off. Listen, that's a fish, boys, right away. Right away. It jumps out of the boat. It doesn't count, right? Nah, he's in. Sanko bass, one on the board. Your boy Noah. Coming back. He's eating one to zero. Beautiful fish.  She ate it. We are on board, baby. First fish, let's get it. What do you guys say about that, Tara? I'm already on board. What, two casts then?  You're not wrong. But listen, I might be richer after this spin or I might be out of debt. You know what I mean? Here we go, boys. Let's get it. What we got? What we got? Come on, give me something good. Minus $20, are you serious? This is not what I signed up for. I guess there's another 20, so I can keep losing money. I might as well keep the deck of money on my side because at this rate, we're gonna be dang broke by the end of the video. Hey, I'll buy you dinner tonight. Yeah, you better. Because you just got another 20. Noah did say that he wanted to put two negative 20s on there. I tried to tell him. I did. I really did. Yeah, it'll be fun. I was like, yeah, we could do it with some money. It was definitely my idea. Jerk bait. There you go. Okay, that's exciting. I'm actually excited about that one. And I actually have one rigged up on a mock crush as well. Mock crush is getting all the attention right off the rip. So this is actually a mock work bait. If you guys wanna check out any of the mock baits I have my discount code on the screen, link to be down below. This puppy right here, me and Tara actually came out here, what was it, about two weeks ago? And we smoked them on this work bait. So I'm kinda excited about it right now because last time we were here, they're eating it. Today's very windy. Ideal conditions for it. Just hope that these fish are gonna bite. Oh my gosh, that rock. That's insane.  There we go. I'm getting here, punk. Man, that rock felt good. I thought that had. That was your phone on us. Yeah, I thought that had Mr. Big Boy. It was a beautiful cast.  There he is. There he is, boys. I am on board with another one. He is running. Uh-oh, Tara. Uh-oh. Uh-oh. Old jerk bait bass, that felt good, man. That felt good. He's going crazy. Not a big one, but not a bad one. Beautiful fish right there. Look at that on the work bait right in the nose. Would you just look at it, Tara? I know you're getting rich today, but would you just look at it? Just look at it. Well, Tara's going to have to catch up. It's our second fish, beautiful bass. Not a big one, but pretty river bass. Thank you, buddy. There we go. What's so cool about this video today, guys, is we're out here on the river, and we're going to be trying out so many different baits. I'm so excited about it, and just getting to throw different things and trying to complete the five bait challenge, which isn't going to be easy. I know we can roll the same bait, but who knows? Maybe I'll end up catching five on five different baits, or maybe Tara will. I guess we won't know until the end. She might make a comeback. You want me? I need a hundred buck bill here, man. I think I'm like 140 bucks in debt right now. Are you serious, bro? All right, it rolled on the crankbait, but it's a negative 20 bucks. I'm literally going to be out of money. There you go, ma'am. She don't even have to... No way. No way, bro. Tara! He's all uplipping it in. What? You lost them? I lost them. Girl. Girl. He's back to me with the money. Yeah, he was getting distracted by the bills, man. Come on, now. What's wrong with you? Well, many of things. All right, well, hopefully I can get some. I thought Tara was going to come back right there, but she choked. Yeah, you can't be choking today, man. I know you're making money, but be serious. I was like, wait, wait, fell down. But I was going for the dollar. This is my last 20.  Wait, you did it again? Yes, I did it again. I don't know what's going on. Gosh, dude, please. Like, I can't. Just give me a bait, bro. Give me a bait. There's only two negative 20s. I swear I've hit it a million times. It's rigged. Hey, give me that 20 back, girl. Give me that 20 back. I never knew I was gonna be spending this thing this much today. I did not expect that. Yeah, I'm a crankbait. Okay, I'll take it. I will take it. So guys, I actually think this might be the hardest bait. And I know you guys are saying, Noah, you're fishing a ripper at bank. Why would a crankbait be the hardest bank? I've been fishing this bank for five years, or not that long, I'd say three years. And I have yet to catch them on a crankbait here. I have tried it so many times.  Today has to be the day that we catch them on a crank. Even though we're gonna be in trouble. So this is actually a mock balancer. So same thing with the mock workbait. If you guys wanna check them out, mocknation.com, link will be down below. Discount code, everything. But yeah, this is actually, I believe this color is called firecrawl. This color is legit. I love this color. It is an amazing one. Let's just hope that we can catch them on it. It's pretty cool, cause these two match too. Got the mock crush with the orange crank. Yeah, there's a lot of leaves. I'm catching the leaves. That is for sure. It's really shallow back here, guys. Not like it's a deep bank. That was a good cast. Listen, if you sweep me, I'll let you have all your money back. That's the deal. The whole jackpot. That's the deal. That's only if you sweep. Oh, hold on. Get him! Who's that? Oh! Okay, wait. Can't you land him? Can't you land him? All right. You have him hooked good. Well, Tara's on board. I didn't sweep her. I'm on two. Tara's on one now. There we go. Beautiful. He's small but mighty. Accounts? Yeah, it kinda hooks better. So, when they're hooked like this, anybody watching too. So, you know how I've taught you how you paralyze them to grab them? Right, yeah.  So it's like right under their gills, your place they can't move. Like this fish can't do anything. Then you can kinda just go in them. Get him. It's crazy. Here you go. That's a little brood. Look at the belly. He's a little brood. There you go. Well, good job, girl. I'm on the board. First fish for Tara. One to two. Now you got a spin, girl. I'm ready to get my money back. Oh, that was a little spin. A worm. Yeah, that's a worm. Oh, I'll take a worm. Yeah, that's a worm. Beautiful. That's the big worm. With the curly tail, right? Yeah. The worm. It's the one with the curly tail. Let's do it. You are about to beat Noah. I'd rather take the thumb. Ooh, hold on. Oh no, your drag. If your drag's not something. Oh, he's still on there. Oh, let's get it. Let's get it. I'm just gonna, oh. Oh my gosh. She just pulled up that reel. What did we learn? Don't always check your drag. Always check your drag. See the bend in my rods then? It was gorgeous. Did you actually have a bite or was it just a rock? Oh my gosh, the fish is still on there. Oh my gosh. Oh my, oh my, oh it's so pretty. How long was he on there? It was a pretty one. Wait, I did hook set him and then it was. Stuck in a rock or something. Yeah, that's crazy. I'm not gonna. Oh my God, I got him. You got him? I got him. I think it's a good one too. We doubled up? Yes, yes. Oh my gosh, come on, baby. Yes, yes. All right, all the stress just went away. I had like a little bit of stress coming on. I'm like, what if I don't catch another fish? And he freaking ate the bouncer. Look at that. I guess they will eat a crankbait in here. That's my first crankbait bass in this marina. That is our third fish. Tara's got her second. We've got her time. Double up. Fish bomb, fish bomb. Fish bomb. Yes ma'am. Heck yeah. They're biting too, Tara. We're catching them. Look at that one. That's not a bad one, Tara. Beautiful markings on them. His lateral line is so pretty. Heck yeah, good job, girl. I know we're going against each other, but good job. Good job clutching it up. Okay, now me and Tara both have to spin. I'm gonna let you spin first, because you did catch it before me. That was actually fun. Now I'm like, why do I have to put down the crankbait? Yeah, it's like some of these bites are so fun to catch them on. Like between the workbait and the bouncer, the bites just feel so good. And now I'm like, I was regretting throwing this, but now that I got a fish on, I'm like, I kind of want to keep throwing it. I'm feeling the hundred again. See, I'm happy with the worm. What you got? What you got? No shot. Oh, you got a fluke. I'll take the fluke. See, that's a good bait. You've been on a good roll. I like that.  I know, back to the fluke. And back to the fluke. That's like a good. I can keep it going. Yeah, yeah, you have another rod. All right, boys. Now for me. How much do you want? I want that day, a hundred bucks. You want to know what I really want. I haven't won no money. I've just got robbed. It's a fluke. Yeah, it's a fluke. Geez, okay. That's fine. I'll take it. I haven't used the fluke. Hey, Jarrah, I'm on my fourth bait for four different baits. That's pretty good. Okay, now we got to rig up a fluke. We actually already have one. On my kick in the bass rod. That is clutch. I've been missing my kick in rod. I love the mock crush, but you guys know I love my kick in rod. They ain't nothing like it. Feels good, cast good. It just feels right for me, guys. Just feels right. So now, this is the fluke off, Tara. It is a fluke. It's the fluke off. Fluke off. Fluke off, boys. Who will catch the first fluke fish? Guys, as much as I want to win this challenge, I would love Tara to catch one right now just to tie it up, to really test our luck right now. And to both be on our fourth bait, that would be pretty crazy. I know this fluke's gonna catch them. We just gotta slow it down, be patient. My fishy. Just eating me. Yes, ma'am. Oh, yes. Oh, yes. Yes. I felt amuted. That was a, all right, that was the hook set of the day. Not a big one. He's fat though. Geez, boy, you've been eating. I got one more. That's my fourth, girl. I'm on my fourth point. I'm going on my fifth bait. Tara's on our third bait. You gotta catch up, girl. Please come down to the last minute here. Pretty fish though. He ate that fluke. Right where we wanted him to. Let's go. Can I please win my hundred dollars?  What is going on, bro? There's my last 20. Geez, man. I don't know if I'd rather lose this challenge or be losing right now. I'd rather freaking have to pay all the money I'm paying. I don't have another 20. I don't even know how to pay you. Pay up, girl. Pay up, girl. Pay up. Listen, I got the old hundo. Where's the money? Where's the money, honey? Come on. Where's the money? Where's the money? I'm rich today. Give me the money. How many 20s have you given me? A lot. Look at that. That's cash and money, guys. That's how you make money right here. Here we go. What is going to be my last bait? My last bait today is going to be, da, da, da, da, da, a hundred bucks. So, give me the old hundo. Give me the old hundo.  Wait till I'll pop this hundo. I'm breaking even. Sweet. We sweet. Yep. Give me that hundo. Give me that hundo. Yaaay. Yes, I did. You rigged it? No, I didn't rig it. I said you rigged it. You said yes, I did.  So when we get home, I got a fluke. It almost laid on the hundred. I was actually excited to either get the crawl because that hasn't been a bait today or the big worm because I would have done five different baits, but I'll take a fluke for the end off. No way. No way. I got it. Fish number three, baby. Let's go. She is coming back. Get in there. She is coming back. You got to get them in the boat. You got to get them in the boat. Oh, no. There we go. There we go. Number three. I'm coming back for Noah. Now you're going on your fourth bait. That is not good, boys. I don't like that. I don't like that right there at all. Thank you, fish number three. Beautiful. They all kind of have big old bellies, don't they? I want you to lose so bad. All right, Tara. Well, why don't you do the honors and spin for your fourth bait? So what is your third bait going to be? Your fourth bait, really? This is my chance to win my money back. Yes, it is. You're not wrong. No money. Just go for a bait. Just go for a bait. Just go for a bait. Go for a bait. Crawl. We have a half-crawl, isn't it? OK. Hey, hey, that's fair. I like that. I want a crawl. I wasn't about to say I can't believe none of us got a crawl. Like, if we would have ended it without that. And that's like a prime river bait. That's one of our favorite baits out here on the river. I am actually already ready for a crawl. I got to close this challenge away. Can't be letting you come back like that. I feel like you're going to get smoked on that crawl, too. So I better catch one on this fluke pretty quick. All right, you guys, I am putting a rage crawl on right now. And the color is going to be that summer crawl. It's a beautiful green. We love to use these out here on the river. Let's do it. No shine, no light. I don't even know it's on there. Fish number four, fish number four. That's a good one here. Be careful, be careful. Hey, that's a big one. Hey. Oh my god, he has another soft plastic in his throat. Oh, bless his heart. I'm about to get it out. Hold on. Yeah, look at this. Look at that. Oh my god, guys. You are crazy. That's our worm from two weeks ago. That stole my worm. I'm about to go back and forth. That is 100% a fish that we lost. Yeah, we got the worm out. And we're about to get this out. Here you go, buddy. Thank you. That was a beautiful one. Super great size. I'm only your fifth bait. I cannot even believe that. That is crazy. Roll the dice. All right. Give me 100. I started with 100. Let's end with it. Go, buddy. No, no, no, no. No, 100. Oh, fluke. You're just the fluke queen today. The fluke has been the number one choice to hit up on on that thing. I've had to use it, what, twice now? And that's your third time? That has been the bait. Come on, fish. Guys, I can't lose this. We've had such a good, like, competitive start here. And now it's just falling apart on the fluke. I don't know what it is. I'm just not getting the bites that I need. That's a biggie now. That's a biggie. The winning fish. Oh, he's not as big as I thought, but that blow-up was insane. He blew it up. Oh my gosh. Let's go, baby. That is for the dub right there, boys. Let's get it. If you guys enjoyed this video, comment down below. Let us know what you thought. If you want to see another challenge with Tara where she has to rematch me, let us know down below. And I'll catch y'all in the next one.


Tools and devices are becoming increasingly intelligent thanks to artificial intelligence algorithms. They can now provide advanced features customized for each user, allowing better services and a more personalized user experience. But the fact that user identification technology often involves sharing data in the cloud raises issues of confidentiality. This is even more of a concern with images when they are used for face recognition. Thanks to the powerful STM32 capabilities, ST Microadronics has developed a solution to embed and run face recognition locally on a single-cost effective microcontroller. This is a solution addressing privacy concerns by processing images locally without using the cloud. Implementing face recognition on STM32 MCUs reduces considerably the bomb cost and allows to embed advanced new features into a wide range of devices. To reduce the development effort and to allow to integrate such features easily on your product, we are providing three code examples with our face recognition library in our new function pack. The FP-AI-FaceRig1 is optimized for the STM32 H747 Discovery Kit with add-on camera board using our well-known STM32cube.ai tool set. Now let's see the board and the function pack in action and let me show you its capabilities. When the person approaches the camera, the face is detected and displayed in a red bounding box, which means it is not recognized. Now let's press the blue button and register myself. As you can see, I am enrolled as user zero indicated by a green bounding box. My face is tracked in real time and it is even working if my head is tilted or not fully facing the camera like in my registration picture. We are reaching up to four frames per second for the face detection and recognition processing. Now let's see what happens with a different person. This person is not recognized as registered user indicated by the red box. But we can choose to learn new faces directly on the target by pressing the blue button. Let's do that. The bounding box is turning green and the person is now recognized as user one. On the display, you can also see the match probability. Thanks to artificial intelligence, devices and tools are getting smarter and are getting enhanced with capabilities to provide customized services and make the users life easier. By detecting who is the user of the equipment, devices can customize their behavior to fit user preferences. For example, a user where HVAC can set the thermostat according to user preference. Smart coffee machines can prepare your favorite beverage automatically and even your smart toastle can customize temperature to toast the bread the way you like it. Other use cases are to automate elevators in office buildings or hotels to automatically select the right floor for each person. Or for example, equipment and machines can adapt their display based on user's registered settings or set height and other ergonomic settings based on users registered morphology. These are only a few examples among many possible applications. Face recognition is an effective way to personalize smart devices behavior, display or settings to the user. Thank you for watching.


Now we're getting down into the level of individuals with drones and smaller groups of people with drones, and we have a great panel Let me just introduce everyone here and then To my right first we have Joseph Hall who is the senior staff technologist at the Center for Democracy and Technology And he writes frequently about security and surveillance and a lot of these issues Matthew Waite who's a journalism professor at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln who founded the drone drone journalism lab To help students and faculty explore how drones are used in reporting And captain Don Roby from the Baltimore County Police Department It was a training program manager at the airborne law and airborne law enforcement Association A quick personal story on this I am not myself a drone flyer But I had a fun sort of encounter with this and the and the unique problems that maybe we encounter with trying to fly Drones for recreational use in DC But so friends of mine who run a very good blog called law fair Got it in their heads last year that they wanted to have a drone smackdown competition And the idea was that they were each going to build using a parrot drone that they were allowed to mod There's a parrot drone in some of these small four rotor things that you can get a brook stone on Amazon for a few hundred bucks You could modify it to within a few hundred dollars and essentially they were going to try and weaponize it No ballistic so it couldn't shoot anything You know people were putting like chainmail and dental floss hanging down to go into the rotors and like sticks on the outside and stuff And we got this bright idea that we were going to go do this in Fort Reno Park And I was going to be the referee and Fort Reno Park is you know up in Northwest Washington And they were advertising this on the blog to sort of get the readers excited about it And we got what effectively I think could count as a cease and desist order from the FAA Saying don't try it There had been an issue with another DC resident a couple weeks before who had flown a drone I think over in Adams Morgan and he maybe had lost track of it and he got a note about that So it was very interesting sort of encounter and what we realized that basically is like these things that I think could rightly be called Hobby aircraft were being so you can't fly them in DC because of the air restriction around Reagan National and the mall and all the rest of it So and there's the FAA looked at this parrot drone with dental floss on it as basically a flight risk So we had to go out to Manassas and do it anyway and MPR covered it and it was really fun So you can go listen that some night, but it was sort of an interesting introduction to like what happens when individuals get hold of this stuff and all of these sort of Potentially really fun and interesting uses and then the way that can sort of collide with policy and regulation and law on a very personal level So we're gonna get into a lot of this kind of stuff and what I want to do is actually Just to start with something very specific Don I want to ask you I mean you come from you're the law enforcement side We've been talking a lot of the public safety applications of this technology just give us a sense of how Baltimore County Police Department is using this stuff right now and how your colleagues and law enforcement are using it or want to well We don't use it in Baltimore County. We're a very traditional aviation unit with three large helicopters What law enforcement is using this for or they want to use it for is for search and rescue They want to use it for crime scene photographing, you know There could be protected areas on that too would require search and seizure warrant for traffic accidents Things of that nature. We also a lot of our aircraft and law enforcement gets used for other governmental Uses we assist the fire departments. We also do work with our environmental protection people for you know runoffs and things like that So that's what you're seeing. You also will see it for like tactical operations in which they would come up And they would just check the rear of a yard to make sure there's no suspect in there They move a SWAT team in or a tactical team in that that area to secure it and that's really what they're using it for Nothing about persistent surveillance. I haven't heard any talk about persistent surveillance in our circles Everything's been operationally necessary and a real quick up-flight check something out bring it back down I mean you can imagine if you have a missing child in a wooded area a small confined area How easy it would be to take one of these devices out of the trunk of a car Launch it check that small area then move on to start checking other areas And that's what we're saying very operationally mode, you know situations like that and that's where we're going with it And is it is it expensive? It is a large part of the budget to do that or is it you realize tremendous savings by very a lot of savings most of our Helicopters like we would operate in my where I work or a very expensive per hour to operate And if you start talking about a unmanned aircraft system a uas small uas You're talking pennies on the dollar to operate it for just a few minutes You could clear it in an area very quickly And so Matt you run a journal a drone journalism lab Tell us about that and then what you're seeing as the potential use for for people like me like you who do reporting I mean what where where is the technology going to take us? Weirdly the answers are a lot the same. It's the kind of uses that I see are Short go up in the air get us perspective on something come back down Maybe fly around an area, maybe not really depends on the kind of skill of the operator Things like natural disasters things environmental change Growth and development anything with like a large spatial extent is where where my mind has gone on a lot of this and the Economic argument actually is the the winning argument here for for journalism is that Those TV news helicopters are multi-million dollar aircraft and they cost many hundreds of thousands of dollars every year to maintain And fuel and hire a pilot and all the things like that when you're talking about something you can buy for less than a thousand dollars and do Just about what you need it to do It's a really really powerful argument it opens up gigantic questions but I think the the kind of Basic use for photo and video is is is pretty obvious it doesn't involve a lot of imagination And are there journalists of organizations doing that now and there are TV stations that have them on newspapers? No because the FAA has said so We have a kind of a limited window that we can we can experiment with as a university, but I get calls pretty much weekly from General managers at news television news organizations editors at newspapers Website operators people like that saying okay. I've got my credit card out. I want to buy what do I get and I'm like hold on Let's let's talk for a moment. I Often tell people that I feel like the dream crusher I said, you know just hold your credit card for just a few more years and We'll be able to talk When you say the FAA says he says no to it I mean is it is it no in the way that they said no to me and my buddies flying in Fort Reno Park? Or is it it's the commercial restriction? Okay, because it's a good if it's a for-profit making journalism exact Yep, they considered journalism to be a commercial purpose End of story I've said all along that if if that were to go away But all the other restrictions would be in place at standard 400 feet have to be away from people have to be far away from an airport Can't fly over built-up areas, you know people's heads ending like that We'd be in business women their stories to be done out in the wide open spaces But that commercial restriction just that pretty much ends it okay, so Joe you're coming at this You know you write about this you're going at it from a policy perspective you're thinking about the social implications I mean one question I want to ask you is you realize this with the with missing with Michael Realistically how long do you think it is in your mind's eye before the technology is let's assume It's available legally and that it's cheap enough for people to get it How long until sort of everyone has a drum and I'm not saying it's ubiquitous is having a cell phone But where you or I could go get them and it's not a novelty anymore. I Think that's right now. I mean you can get pretty capable Drone platforms with various kinds of sensor packages right now The trick is is that you know, I think what you're seeing in terms of sort of the public reaction Sort of a visceral react visceral reaction is that you know We want to integrate these things not only into our airspace But in sort of the fabric of our society and do so in a responsible way in my PhD I hacked voting machines and one of the things we learned there was that we had introduced You know networked and computerized voting machines just Instantaneously after the 2000 election we hadn't taken the time to figure out. Hey, these things are actually pretty bad And and I think you know, we I see similar things here in the sense that we want to make sure this is done responsibly I don't think you know There are some voices that say no drones at all and there's some voices that say no regulation at all And I think it's it's somewhere in the middle. I don't know where it is You know, but when you start having these things co-occupy manned space manned airspace And when you start having Things like the thing that I always think about the thing that's sort of my litmus test And I still don't have a good answer for this is what if you know a major corporation starts flying Automated license plate reader drones and has sort of like a Search engine where you can put people's license plates in and see everywhere where they're driven I think that sort of brings a lot of things together in that sort of thought experiment in the sense that not a lot of people Would enjoy that existing There's not a lot that regulation could do to stop that kind of a thing But it's the kind of thing that it will happen eventually and Is it worth sort of the chill on our ability to freely assemble or to speak? And you know another sort of privacy related interest to do that or should we have a more sort of normative discussion? and you know people like the the AUV SI and the Don had mentioned in a in an email the International Association achieved So please have sort of these codes of conduct for doing these kinds of things responsibly but from a lot of other industry areas I've seen codes sort of slip over time as People realize they could sort of get away with more And so I just want to you know at our at CDTR interest is sort of balanced in balancing the innovation and the public interest in using these Technologies and so that's part of the conversation This is a topic of persistent surveillance has come up and on you mentioned this as well I mean this idea of having a Flying pla be essentially a flying camera over a large area and watching it all the time And you mentioned potentially even reading license plates What does the law say or what do we think it says about the ability of? Either a governmental agency or even just an individual to watch someone with a camera like this I mean that the Supreme Court has said if you're gonna put a GPS tracker on a car You need a warrant to do that, but do I have an expectation of privacy if I'm just walking down the street? There are security cameras probably 15 between here and the next block, but what does the law say about that sure? So I'm not a lawyer although. I may play a good one occasionally. I'm sort of half a lawyer half a computer scientist but It's clear that you know when the government is operating a surveillance platform and doing so In places where people might expect privacy might have a what we call a reasonable expectation of privacy You need a warrant you know premised on probable cause to collect that information And you have to do things like minimization to make sure you only collect Data that's relevant to the investigation For for private use. It's much it's much more broad There are some things that are clearly no-nose like voyeurism, you know using It's a little tiny drone to view in someone's bedroom is gonna get you in a lot of trouble I think Weaponizing drones. I don't understand the fascination with that because it's just it's kind of maybe it's just that's the extreme or whatever but clearly Shooting drones or having drone shoot things is probably you know that that's a totally different thing entirely But they're sort of like these voyeurism Aspects peeping Tom aspects video surveillance, you know these things that you know have been that Over the years policy law has said okay You can photograph pretty much anything in public, but when you get up to that point where People have an expectation of privacy. That's when we're gonna feel the need to come in and stop you Expectation of privacy in my home. Don maybe you want to speak to this But this is not necessarily walking down the street, right exactly a minute You have no expectation of privacy for your tag number. That's why you have license plate readers Where the problem comes in to what do you do with the data that you capture who has access to it? Now long do you keep it? That's the same thing with UAS is what are you doing the data the images? How long are you keeping it and what are audit controls and controls that you have in place to make sure it's properly viewed and then It's taken out of the system and it's purged out there. That becomes the problem Let's face it most of us in here. We've advocated a lot of our privacy away We have with our phones. They track everywhere you go. It's horrible.  It's it's what's that Okay, but you have in a way I mean mapple can tell you where you are with your iPhone at any time We have to get that we have to get a quarter order to get that if we need that and that should be the same thing If it's an expectation of privacy, we should have us need a search warrant or a quarter to access that That's how we do it and we don't know bones of battered are the IACP the International Association to choose the police guidelines We say that no no case law No one to says and if you had this the cartilage of a house or there's an expectation of privacy You have to get a search and seizure one for it. That's why there's no cartilage. You're using these on a crime scene There's crime scenes in a back of a yard. That's the courtesy of a house You need a search and seizure one to process that and you would have to do the same thing to take the photos from the air You have to include that in there. So we look at it like that Probably the furthest from being a lawyer on sure here who say I'm not a lawyer, but I follow a lot of them on Twitter There was a there's an interesting argument actually in that drone Jones GPS case about it was in one of the ascending opinions about how That kind of persistent surveillance of the government knowing Where you assemble when you assemble and who you assemble with as being anathema to your first amendment right to free assembly so there's Hintings of some constitutional problems with this kind of persistent surveillance idea even in public places so It's not totally foreign landscape here Even you're necessarily dealing with you're on a lawyer, but you you're operating within an ethical sphere as a journalist So when you talk to Students or to editors and news organizations I mean have you started developing kind of a code of conduct for how to ethically as a reporter use a drone We are in the process of doing that now. We have been Trying to develop our own platforms and actually get them in the air and kind of see what Capabilities they have and what what journalists could do with them Well, which I'll tell you right now if you're worried about journalists getting UAVs and flying them I'm here to tell you you can relax journalists are horrible pilots So We actually had a funny funny revelation that we were really scared when we tried just simple waypoint navigation And we realized that the when we turned it on it was actually flying it better than we were so Which probably shouldn't have been that surprising, but yes We're we're we're attempting to do that and when I talked to my students just about ethics and about journalism in general What I tell them that is that what journalists the power that journalists have is attention we can draw attention to a thing and that attention can have positive effects and it can have negative effects and so this technology enters into that fray and For the foreseeable future with journalists using UAVs, they're going to draw attention to themselves and Not in a whole lot of positive ways at least so far. I think there are a number of Attorneys who are interested in the rather novel legal avenues that this will present in terms of libel and false light and Things like that. There's a number of interesting laws being passed Like California's anti-stalker laws There are a number of ag-gag bills being passed in farm states that make it illegal to photograph a farm Well, you put a UAV you put a camera on a UAV in Nebraska You're photographing a farm you don't have to get more than 20 feet off the ground and you're photographing a farm somewhere So that's going to be a real problem for somebody like me So yeah, there's there's a significant amount of work to be done in terms of developing kind of rules for the road for journalists that go Beyond the law like what you know the FAA says you can do this Local law say you can do that There's a third layer and it's that ethical layer of just because you can doesn't mean you should Sure, go ahead. So I'm not sure if it's your university But I think a University of North Dakota has a what's essentially an institutional review board for research-based uses UAS and UAV platforms. I'm wondering is you know, essentially for those of you have haven't had to deal with that You put your proposal in front of a board and they make sure you're ethically operating a research instrument like a drone I'm wondering if you is that appropriate is that is that may be very unfamiliar to journalists But you know it doesn't allow you to act very quickly, but maybe for longer investigative pieces You could sort of have a community policing function It's it's an interesting idea. I know that The journalists in me is like But We've talked here today about how you know the kind of responsible uses in the next few years are going to be really key in that Abuses over the next few years will be will be magnified because they will be the first and I have said to my students to my Faculty to my dean that I am not going to be the one on the on the front page of the paper screwing this up So that that may be we have not gone that route yet I'm not certain you're going to you would probably ever see that in terms of the professional sphere sphere but There are codes of ethics that have Some what been adopted that are somewhat followed and we think that's certainly a direction that we're going to pursue Honestly, my feeling about this all is that even after we get we get Aviation policy in place everybody and their brother is going to get sued and it's going to be a few years before courts work through a lot of these things And that's when the real work will start is that kind of three to five years after we actually get aviation law in place So you've talked about you have a professional kind of ethical obligation that keeps that in check Obviously with law enforcement. There are rules. There are laws.  It's a little drone with a grappling hook that goes over and steals something Is that realistic? I mean you think that is this technology proliferates It sort of brings out people's bad instincts and then how do you even realistically counter that? I mean that that that gets down to the level of almost such low level kind of petty bad behavior That can you really stop that absent any kind of just Shaming of it, I guess but we're going So Margo Kaminski from Yale has a great paper called drone federalism and the idea being that We may need to allow the states and local localities develop Specific types of rules for the road for these kinds of things because there's typically sort of that kind of law and regulation that sort of bounds the federal sort of you know wiretapping type of stuff and and and sort of free speech, you know free for all And I think that's a good way to think about this I mean you definitely hit the nail in the head There's going to be things we can't even think of like I think of some of my researcher friends making You know sensor networks of moats that they sort of drip over, you know a household or a bunch of them or something like that But you know, I think what Matt said really resonates is that We can we can only predict so much and then when it comes down to it We're going to have to really work this out as sort of a social and policy and you know commercial negotiation of as to what's right and The bad actors are the ones that are going to get a lot of the press Um, let me ask you I want to take sort of a recent real-world events and ask us to sort of reimagine them If drones were sort of on the case And don't want you to answer this question first just from a pure law enforcement perspective If there had been drones doing persistent surveillance over the Boston Marathon Would it have made any difference in spotting The alleged bombers or would have made any difference in the immediate Aftermath of the of the rescue I think what had a very really Dramatic impact on on the response because you had that eye in the sky You're looking down to reallocate your resources Clearing areas and and so forth what it prevented it. Who knows I don't know. I don't think any of us, you know could really answer that But I think it gives that incident commander the uh that you know Situational awareness to move the resources where he or she Needs them and get medical help in their rescue crews and law enforcement in there And as people are taken out at what assist them in clearing areas, there's a suspicious package here there or whatever But I mean fixed surveillance did a pretty darn good job finding out who did it So we we had you know, we had we had it so now to take a phase two of this question if We're five years in the future and this has happened and many of the residents of water town have a drone And there's a manhunt on and the residents of water town put their drones up And started trying to look around the neighborhood and almost crowd sourcing crowd sourcing the search Does that change something? Is that what does that look like? chaos I mean do you all think though that there is there I mean is that is that too far out to imagine that individuals with Drones in moments of crisis would say, you know, I'm going to put the I'll find the guy I'm going to put this to you. So I'll do it all canvass my block Well, keep in mind. They shut down the airspace Over over the city of Boston. So I've had a number of people call me up and say, well, you know How could we have covered the the manhunt with with these could we could we have been flying around? Could we have found them?    It's such a protected type of speech that, you know I want to see us figure out a way to do these kinds of things and you know You think of there's been a number of collisions of news helicopters covering the same event And you get arbitrary drones in that mix too It gets kind of crazy and something that that we sort of have been thinking a lot about and it sounds like It resonates with some folks is this idea of a of a license plate and Dr. Cummings probably is gonna laugh at me for being so so lowbrow, but the idea being that Drones that are going to co-occupy man space need to broadcast a signal saying where they are How fast they're going and an identifier so that we can look up, you know, what that drone's doing and And that could also be useful from by other manned aircraft knowing sort of what's around them And you know, you know where they can maneuver and maybe even having Cordon's where you say look this is specifically You know cordoned off area where UAV platforms can operate and and and you're gonna have a lot of them running into each other or whatever Maybe not. Maybe they can avoid each other But you know, there's you know, that's what I think about when I think of emergency situations and having Either citizens or or small Low resource response, you know covering those kinds of things we there's gonna have to be both policy and technical solutions to make that Work without having, you know fire and brimstone And to be clear too when we when you all are talking about the applications of this technology and your respective fields of work You're talking about relatively low flying Localized you're not talking about drones going up and flying in the jet stream with you know, delta jets or anything like this So does that seem like a fairly workable system to let Communities figure out how they want to allow drones to fly in the neighborhood? Uh personally, no Because it would just create it. I mean it's There are 39 states that are considering their own limitations on UAVs In their own air spaces, which is going to create a kind of a nightmare scenario of Hey, I work for cnn and oh, there was a tornado in x state. I'm now on the car Well, I've got to figure out what the rules are there if it's every city and every county and every state It's it would just be the will-during trying to figure it out Is there a one-size-fits-all policy? No, but my my immediate gut instinct is like well, that's just chaos That would be impossible to to work with Unless there was some kind of national resource that explain what the rules were in every jurisdiction and and to be you know part of this kind of Drone federalism idea you had to submit whatever it is the rules were in your community and how they differed in everything else And there was some kind of structured way, but that'll never happen I guess I don't worry so much about that in the sense that um You know, there's been a a lot of there's a lot of good resources for FOIA for you know the party laws of you Know associated with recording stuff But I guess when you get down to You know, I know like there's certain midwestern states don't even have counties They have townships and it gets into the tens of thousands per for a thing that we have counties of 500 people Now what are your thoughts on how it works at a local level I think at a local level you have to engage your communities with the policy aspect I think the regulatory will be done by the feds and by You know powers to be there, but we we have to engage our communities and what what will the community accept? That's the most important thing that look at seattle the community will not accept UASs in seattle They're not flying them, right? The police they specifically prohibited the police. Exactly. So you have to engage them You have to educate them. I mean right now we see a story about a law enforcement UAS and it's a predator drone That's the photo when the magazine's credit every time It's a predator drone And now we're talking things under the five pounds very small small devices Well, how do you go about it? I mean in bolton or how do you do that? How do you tell people?  You know communicate to them and and are they concerned about that? I think you have to let them see your policy You have to post the policy has to be transparent policy They have to be able to look at it and say whoa time out We're not going to allow you to do this.  You saw the surveys out how you know the variety of responses there But if we don't engage the communities we're going to have them against us on this They already are to some extent against us on this in a lot of areas across the country Yeah, it does seem like there are pockets. I mean Charlottesville, Seattle There are other examples where there seems to be almost a Community resistance kind of welling up and creating little models for how to do that In other jurisdictions. It's about education. We had to educate educate the citizens I mean if if if if Baltimore County suddenly had a prohibition on this I mean it wouldn't I mean how negatively would that affect your ability to do search and rescue? I mean I take it it doesn't it wouldn't because you're not really doing much of it right Well, we do it with helicopters, right? We do it with man's we have hoist on our helicopters We do it that with man's systems, you know I think this doesn't impact major departments what it impacts is the smaller departments that can't afford a traditional aviation unit And and as such that when you get into that 50 60 70 thousand dollar market and be able to get federal grants or whatever to obtain that equipment That impacts them They'll never get into the traditional aviation unit, but this is an avenue for them to get into some aspect of aviation Oh, well, there's an exact same argument for journalism The law enforcement deals with is uh is the public elected representatives of people Journalism, it's the marketplace I don't think that many news consumers would bat an eye If I were flying a UAV over or a tornado path And showing them the extent of the damage The moment I stalk Lindsay Lohan the market's going to react poorly To that at least I hope Judging by TMZ's traffic, I'm not well TMZ said hilariously My phone lit up like crazy when a false report that TMZ had applied for an FAA permit had gone out And everybody's asked me is it true? Is it true? Is I'm I I have no idea But when it turned out to not be true, they were asking me about this I said Well, the reason everybody believed it was because it makes abundant sense that they would want to do this That's why we all believed it was because it just made sense But it's that marketplace that's going to do that that same kind of reaction And it's and it's going to be what mark what your market will allow you to do and what you allow you to get away with I just want to ask you one last round of brief questions because I think the audience is that there's a lot of people here And I know they're going to want to interact with you, but just briefly let me go around One of the things we want to get at in this whole conversation is How if we think this is a good idea to have a drone of one zone and that this is technology that can be useful in any number of ways Um, I guess a question is a do you think that's true? And we should be encouraging wider adoption of that technology and be how would you go about doing it in a practical way If if you have some ideas on that start with you Why is it a good idea? Well, I think mike said the computers are around would you say 50 years mike? And uh, then all of a sudden now we have cyber crimes So I think we're going to probably have some of this with uas's And so if would there be a tool of a crime or an instrument of a crime? I mean you could see that going down that path But I think it's going to be widely accepted as time goes on as these devices get smaller and more technical the the Systems on board the the imaging systems and and sensing systems become more Sophisticated that you will see them being applied more and more in law enforcement and public safety in general and by government You will see that, you know I'll make a devil's advocate argument. Um, I I do believe that there is Positive application of technology and I do believe that there are a number of industries that should be pursuing it But I'll make I'll make the devil's advocate argument that everybody having a drone of their own is a terrible idea Because speaking from from hard personal experience When you when you when you graduate up from the kind of toy size when you get in a little bit bigger now You're talking about Four six eight 12 inch long blades spinning really really fast. So now you have a flying lawnmower and I'm not good at flying it. My students are better than than I am But we've practiced a lot and we've practiced at some really confined and in kind of safe places Not everybody's going to do that and so a whole community of flying lawnmowers sounds outright terrifying to me So that's the devil's advocate argument. I'll make that that everyone having a drone of their own is a terrible idea Um, I don't know. I guess I'm on the fence here I think the timeline for integration into the national airspace of 2015 seems like a good timeline for me knowing how Regulation works and things like that. Um And so I'm happy just to let it do its thing. I know that's not quick enough for what some people want to do Um, and and I do think that there should be space for You know relaxing And somewhat quickly some of these restrictions like for right now, you know, you if you're 400 feet outside three miles of an airport and for recreational purposes, you know, you could do You you you could operate one of these things But in the second, you know, someone had mentioned this the second you do it for educational research or commercial purposes It's all of a sudden illegal and I think we got to explore ways of relaxing that a bit Before we have this full integration. I don't I don't have good answers there yet. Um, You know the certificate of authorization process is Is really onerous, but I think it is because you come from the safety point of view Um, either things flying out of the sky you have these, you know clouds of lawn mowers, um and things like that and Um, you know, so I I don't have a good answer I'm not going to say we should encourage it, but I also don't want to say we should discourage it You know, I really would like to see it, you know do its thing. Certainly me as a technologist Um, I am totally fascinated by them and if we were in a single income family I would probably have one in Tacoma park, you know Getting stuck in trees like there was this great picture You may have seen where a guy a videographer got his stuck in Lady Liberty's sword in Marion County, Ohio And he was sitting there for a week. Someone helped me get it down And we're like, we're not going to help you get you essentially what I was calling you lost frisbee And so I think that's something I hadn't predicted, but yeah, of course these things are going to get stuck all over the place Okay, let's open it to question. Yes, sir from the back right there from the the drone user group Woo, user group. I'm still Timothy Reuter president of the DC area drone user group And I love the title of this panel A drone of one's own because that's exactly what we're trying to do We try and train as many people as possible to build and operate their own drones And I invite everyone here if you're interested in doing that check out dcdrone.org And we're happy to help you with that, but I do have an actual question Which is I'd like to actually get your advice because we have this Funny situation in the us right now Where members of our group are allowed to do a lot of things that the people who are sitting up here are not So I'd be interested to get your perspective How we might best be able to responsibly use this opportunity To drive innovation in this space What are the things that you're not allowed to do because you're affiliated with institutions that you'd like to see Groups like ours doing to have a positive impact with this technology Under this recreational exception because we like to help people recreationally This is definitely for the other guys So I'll just make a funny comment Which is I'd love to be able to deliver 50 copies of written testimony to the hill without having to pay a courier So you know if we can get a drone to do that awesome I could make a funny comment as well that the the beer delivery I think there's a real serious weight to power consumption problem here that we need to talk about I think whiskey is probably the more optimal delivery vehicle here That said I would take I would take a I would take a page from the the open source movement post your code Post your results post your results write about what you do Make it all public Put it all out there so that people can see it People like me people, uh, you know who are doing research people who are in this kind of regulatory environment and see that Hey, this can be done and it's not so scary That's what I would do I agree It's about education letting people know the capabilities and about good quality r&d And they're in a position to do it for us They really are most of these companies started off in a garage And that's the way it's going to be done And I would also say test cases, you know to the extent you think that That something shouldn't be prohibited I mean it may take just as long to get through the judicial system as it would to you know wait for Regulation to happen, but that could be another way You know work with nonprofits that bring litigation to to actually try and challenge some of this stuff Okay, more questions. Yeah, right here Hi, I'm uh, William Angel In a legal and journalism sense Is there and should there be a difference between having a camera in your hand or you know on a backpack strap Is there a difference between that and having a drone flying over your head or 10 feet over your head? And should that should there be a legal and journalistic difference? Uh again, not a lawyer, but I follow a lot of them on Twitter. Um My sense is that yes, uh in terms of uh private property law and Things like that generally people own You don't own up to the end of the universe above your property It ends at the national airspace. So there's a there's a gigantic capital Q question of what happens between you know above your arm and 400 feet Um Can I look can if I can see something from the public street or something like that? Is it is it fair game? I don't know. Um, I don't know if that area has actually ever been explored. Uh, and it would be Fascinating and I think again Everybody and their brother is going to get sued So this is going to be one of those novel areas where where this is going to where this is going to come into play and I think Going back to this this drone federalism idea There are a number of states that would say absolutely you own that kind of invisible wall, you know at the edge of your property up to 400 feet and Poking a camera into it. There are there are some states that actually where that would be illegal Of photographing into somebody's property is already A misdemeanor crime. So Yeah, we're uh, we're into some interesting ground here. Yeah, and legally there's Legally, there's a bunch of different things going on here. There's been a bunch of sort of Um fourth amendment cases, which means government, you know collecting information about possible illegality where some of it said You know, you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy from being imaged from publicly navigable airspace Others have said Look, they spent eight hours and like took Thousands of pictures without getting a warrant. That's not right And there you know, there's other things like this notion of privacy in public And I'm sure there's there's legal minds in this room that know this stuff way better than me But you know, there's a Georgia Supreme Court case where they actually found, you know That that photographing a woman's underwear in public. She was still had a reasonable expectation of privacy You know, we have private areas that we carry with us and stuff like that. Anyway, so it's pretty complicated But I think there is a a significant difference and you know the People constantly talk about, you know, manned aircraft versus drones. What's the difference? You know, that's an even clearer cut, you know situation the lower cost, you know, the There's there's the you know the fact that they can do things human pilots can't do go between buildings and stuff like that I do think that there there's a pretty big difference there Don thoughts on if it's if it's different the way he describes Not really I think It depends what you do with it. I mean if you do good with it and you're filming a story, that's one thing I think it depends how far they take it. Like you said when they go into that protected area That's where you're crossing the line Your associations as chiefs of policemen they have guidelines for telling individual communities like This is how you should police drones or keep an eye on Yes, I mean they we have that we also say we want you to use a reverse 911 system We want you to contact people. Hey, we are operating a uis in this area. This is what's going on We want them to do that We also want to make sure it's high visibility paint, you know paint schemes on it and lighting and that kind of stuff So, you know, we're letting them know. Hey, we're up. We're up there doing it Zero data retention, you know, unless it's for criminal investigation evidence, don't keep anything That's really from from from my perspective. That's so awesome Okay, sir here in the front. Yeah, because I missed you last time. I'm sorry Thank you. I'm Joel Garrow from Arizona State University in New America Charles Krauthammer has said that the first person to use a second amendment weapon to blow one of these things out of the sky Over his backyard is going to become an american folk hero. What do you think of that? It's already been done It's been done twice to my knowledge There was a an animal rights group That took issue with a number of private hunt clubs that were having these kind of canned dove hunts Where they just put a bunch of doves in a box. They open the box up. They go up They shoot them with shotguns They had a a small there was a Six rotor multi copter and they were over a public highway And they were trying to film this going on and exactly what you think happened began happening and you started hearing shots ring out and you know You know a a light gauge shotgun from that distance It took a pretty good shot to take one down and sure enough hit a motor And actually, you know credit to the pilot He was able to kind of put it in his outer rotation and get down to the ground and land without it crashing and nobody getting hurt They started yelling at each other across the fence. You know, hey, we got your drone You know, so yeah, there was a prior to that They had done the same thing at a different place It got shot down and crashed on the property of the hunt club The hunt club refused to let them go on there and get it That thing is still to this day hanging in a tree and is the subject of a court case over it so I hate to say it but Charles is kind of behind the kind of curve here people have already been shooting these things down Yeah in australia too. There's cattle ranchers in australia that have actually said if we see any of these Over our land and we're going to ball them out of the sky So maybe what he needs is a especially public Display like maybe a dick chainie or something, you know I I do a number of Interviews with other media about this they call me. I'm asking about this stuff all the time And I can almost guarantee you that within the first two comments on the story There's somebody saying I'm gonna get my shotgun down and shoot it down. It's just Predictable as it can be Part of me says take a crack sport if you can hit it good on you. Um, but um There are I I have a lot of kind of open questions about things that go up must come down And suddenly you're putting a lot of bullets in the air and that's You know look at any city on on new year's eve. It's a really desperately bad idea But it's a common feeling This is this is your nightmare. Yeah, absolutely whether it's our UAS or an agency's uas. It doesn't matter. I mean you're talking reckless endangerment at some point and then It gets a little crazy.  I pretty much guarantee it, right? So I'm gonna shoot at it Okay, well, we've reached the end of your time for this panel. So I want to thank you all for a great discussion


Firefighters aided by aircraft are battling to contain a wind-driven wildfire that has damaged or destroyed at least nine buildings in rural Southern California and forced authorities to issue evacuation orders for 4,000 residents. The Highland Fire is burning Tuesday near the Riverside County Hamlet of Awanga after breaking out Monday and being spread by gusty Santa Ana winds over 3.5 square miles of brushy hills, fire spokesman Jeff LaRusso says about 1,300 homes are under evacuation orders. So far, no injuries are reported, but three structures are confirmed destroyed and six others have been damaged. I feel like I can tell you how, I feel bad.