Привет всем! Сегодня я буду говорить о ЦУК-256 и спектраль-анализистах для криптоанализистов. Меня зовут Александр Максимов, и я из Эликсона-ресечь, в Резадинге в городе Люнд, в Сведен. Эта работа была сделана вместе с Янг-Янг и Томас Йохансон из Люнд-Университи. Сначала я сделаю небольшую интердукцию к ЦУК-габаритуму, потом я покажу для линии дистингущих атак на ЦУК, потом я сделаю спектраль-анализистов для криптоанализистов. ЦУК-256 это домистический экстремальный сайфер, который использовался в 4G мобильных сообществах. Он был разработан и использован в Китае. ЦУК-258-бит-ки-версия была стандартирована по 3GPP в 2011 году. В данный момент, у ЦУК-256-бит-ки-габаритумы используются в 5G и beyond. ЦУК-дизайн-тимп предложил использовать именно то же дизайн, но с длинной 256-бит-ки и 184-бит-ИВ. Новая версия ЦУК-бит-ки-версия была представлена в Eurocrypt Rump сессии в 2018 году. И там была фоллоупная работа на альгаритуме. ЦУК-бит-ки-версия имеет линиевый фидбекшист-регистр ЛФСР и файнестет-машин ФСМ. И он производит 32-бит-ки-стрима в каждом клоке. ЛФСР работает в прайм-филде МОД-ЛОД-2-31-1, пока ФСМ построен на GF-2-32. Бит-реорганизация лея миксирует бит с ЛФСР и опускает 32-бит-ки-версия к ФСМу, длина как икс-терм в фигуре. Это трудно анализировать ЦУК-бит-ки-бит-ки-габаритум. Так что стандартные криптанализовые методы не очень легко применять. Но в этом работе мы нашли первую и лучшую знаменитую, академическую атаку, которая быстрее than exhaustive key search. Это линьер-дистингвичная атака в комплексе 2-2-3-4-3-6, которая означает, что цук-бит-ки-стрим генератера не имеет целых 256-бит-ки-бит-ки-версия. Яеру уduпатиться, что в 5-гитisions эта атака меняет nueva пора, он фактует только циордичный результат. ussr 0-1 К Фильм. the degree of that polynomial is expected to be around 2 to the power 167, based on the birthday paradox. Then for each 32-bit x-term constructed by the bit reorganization layer, we can get the equation under two parallel 16-bit additions, that is almost true, but with some 32-bit carry noise c. For example, if we consider the signal x1, then that equation would look like as it is shown in the green box. Wiesen found a theoretical result, basically saying that if we take s-values in the equation 1 and extract any consecutive t-bits from this s-values, then the sum of those sub-values truncated by t-bits would generate a random carry with only possible values 0 or plus minus 1, and probabilities of these values are the same for any sub-bits that we extract from those s-values. As the consequence in the red box, we then conclude on the distribution of the 32-bit carry noise c. The lower and higher 16-bit values of c are independent and they have the same distribution, such that the probability of 0 is 2 3rd, and for other two values plus minus 1, the probability is 1 over 6. Now, when we found the constellation rule on x-terms, we can proceed with approximation of the finite state machine. Consider the expressions for two consecutive key stream words. It's clear that two words should be enough to approximate the FSM, where on one side there will be a noise, and on the other side there will be x-terms. However, we can use the above constellation rule on x-terms and derive the total noise, while including the constellation rule on x directly into the noise expression, and it gives a larger bias overall. That idea can be used in analysis of other stream ciphers as well. In our attack, we chose a straightforward form of the sampling equation given in the yellow box, and there the attacker only needs to choose a single binary masking matrix M. As a result, we took a simple form of sampling, which is then equal to the biased noise expression. We found the masking matrix M that effectively made the bias of the total noise B2 to the power minus 236. We actually used squared Euclidean imbalance for the bias computation. It means also that the complexity of a distinguishing attack is one over the bias. This way we achieved an academic attack on Tsuk that is 2 to the power 20 times faster than exhausted key search. There are only two problems remain as noted in the green box. The first problem is how to compute those 32-bit noise distributions for N1 and N2 noise variables, the exact expressions for which will be given on the next slide. And the second problem is how did we actually found that linear masking matrix M that gave us the large bias of the total noise. Here we have complete expressions for 32-bit noises N1 and N2, where N1 is for the most split into the sum of two sub noises N1A and N1B, just simply because they use different random variables. Without going into details, these three sub noises are basically approximations of arithmetical additions into X-source plus those C-carry noises involved in the approximation of X terms. If we take for example N1A, a naive way to construct that distribution would require a very huge loop of size around 2 to the power 553, which is totally computationally infeasible. However, we can utilize and modify a bit slicing technique so that we could compute the distribution of this noise variables in time around 2 to the power 47. I would like to skip the details of the bit slicing technique and would rather refer to the full paper for this. So the second problem that is more interesting was to find the matrix M such that the total bias of the noise expression is maximized. And this we can do with spectral analysis techniques. So in the next part of this presentation I will mainly speak about spectral analysis tools for cryptanalysis. In cryptanalysis we often have to deal with multidimensional expressions for noise variables. It is fair to say that multidimensional approximations give larger biases than binary approximations just because of a multidimensional distribution contains more information than just a single bit of it. So I assume we have n-bit alphabet, like 32-bit alphabet, for example, and we have t random variables x1, x2 and so on. An n-bit distribution table of random variable x can be converted to the frequency domain by using either FDFT or Walsh Hadamard transform, depending on operations that we will later want to do with that spectrum. That conversion can be done efficiently in time by utilizing fast algorithms. So in case of 32-bit expressions, it is 2 to the power 32 times 32. The values of the spectrum table can be positive and negative, but note that the first value in position 0 is equal to 1, which is the sum of all probabilities of the distribution table in the time domain. In case the original distribution table was not normalized, then that value in the spectrum position 0 will serve as a normalization factor. So why spectral analysis is so interesting and what we can actually do there in the frequency domain? In the frequency domain, we can compute the bias of a noise variable in such a way that even very small biases can be handled efficiently without the need for long number arithmetic. In the expression for the total noise, we often see an arithmetic sum or an xor of two or more noise variables, so we can compute convolutions of such noise distributions efficiently in the frequency domain and it is in linear time instead of quadratic complexity in the time domain. We can also use spectral analysis for approximations of s-boxes, and not only the small ones, but also large composite s-boxes as well. And we can also search for a good linear masking in the frequency domain that would result in large bias of the total noise in the end. So spectral tools are very powerful and very interesting methods for cryptanalysis. Let's have a look how the bias can be computed in the frequency domain. So we compute the bias as a squared Euclidean imbalance as shown in the above first formula. When the bias is defined in such a way, then a distinguisher would need around one over the bias number of samples in order to distinguish that source of noise from random. This way, if the expected bias is, for example, 2 to the power minus 512, then in the time domain we have to use float numbers with precision at least 256 bits. This means we have to use large number arithmetic, which in turn takes a lot of RAM and computation time. Let's again have a look on the right picture with the values in the frequency domain. We have shown that in the frequency domain the bias is actually the sum of those red boxes at all nonzero locations, but each red value should be taken into power of 2. The zero point value is again a normalization factor. The consequence of this observation is that in order to handle small biases in the frequency domain, we only need a few bits of precision, but the exponent field should be there and it should be preserved. So the standard C type double works very well for storing the spectrum of a noise distribution, even if the bias is very small, so we don't need to use a long number arithmetic in the frequency domain. Then having two or more spectrums of noise distributions, we can actually perform a convolution of those noise variables, so that corresponds to the expression where we do an arithmetical addition or XOR of those noises. The resulting spectrum is achieved by a point-to-point multiplication of the spectrums of the original noise distributions. This way, for example, we can compute the bias of an XOR of two noise variables in the spectrum domain without having to switch back to the time domain. Recall that there we need float numbers with high precision. However, an important observation here is that the convolution is a point-wise multiplication of the input spectrum vectors, so that the largest bias of the result will be achieved if there would be a red box in the resulting spectrum that would have a very high absolute peak value. So the peak values in the spectrum will contribute the most to the total bias. So let's take a simple case when we have only two noise variables and we want to sum them together. If we take the first noise variable and find a way how to rotate or shuffle its spectrum such that the largest red boxes of the first and the second noise distributions match in some nonzero location, then the sum or convolution of these two noise variables will result in a large bias. Because of the peak values are now synchronized and the product of them contributes as a large noise in their result. This observation can be used for searching good linear masks and this motivates us to develop spectral tools for cryptanalysis fuser on. So consider the general case when we have t n-bit noise variables x1, x2 and so on and we want to find the sequence of linear matrices m1, m2 and so on, each of size n times n bits such that the sum expression above would result in a new noise variable x that would have a very large bias. So we found how the matrix multiplication in the time domain affects the spectrum in the frequency domain and this result can be used as the basis for an algorithm that can find the spectrum peaks in each of those noise distributions of x1, x2 and so on and then the algorithm will construct such m matrices so that those peak values in those sub-spectrums will be shifted and aligned in certain спектrum points and this way it will result in a large bias of the total sum of these sub noises. We also found a similar technique for discrete Fourier transform case where the sum of noise variables is actually an arithmetical addition truncated by n bits but here instead of searching for binary matrices we need to search for odd n-bit coefficients and then we do in our best in order to get a large possible bias of the resulting sum. We didn't go much deeper with DFT cases since we couldn't use these results for two cryptanalysis but we sort of sketched the general way forward in DFT cases as well. Spectral techniques can also be used for an analysis and approximation of S-boxes. Normally there are small sizes S-boxes which are then combined with linear transformations so that we get a large composite S-box. For example in Sook we have 32-bit S-boxes composed by first applying a 32-bit linear transformation then 4 8-bit parallel S-boxes to individual bytes of the 32-bit input word. In Snow 3G it is vice versa. First we use 4 8-bit S-boxes then afterwards we apply a linear combination matrix on the 32-bit word. So in general we can say that such composite S-boxes can be generalized as a matrix R times parallel smaller S-boxes on the product of another matrix Q times the input X. An approximation of such a composite S-box would then be a boundary matrix M times the input X. The question here is how to find the approximation matrix M such that the approximation would give us a large bias of the noise. We started our analysis from usual smaller S-boxes and we found how an approximation matrix M of such an S-box would affect the spectrum of the approximation noise. The case point of the spectrum of such an approximation by the matrix M times the input X can be expressed as another point lambda equal to K times M of the spectrum of the case vector B that is in turn associated and constructed from the given S-box and the index K. So we know where we want to move the highest peak, it is location K in the spectrum and we know where the highest peak is currently located, it is lambda. Then we derive the matrix M to make this happen. This is the central idea of the spectral analysis to be able to move high red boxes into a wanted spectrum position and this way we learn how to align multiple noise spectrums and get a large overall bias in the end. For small S-boxes we can basically pre-compute all possible values for different K and the different lambdas. So for example for 8-bit S-boxes that would cost us that would have a complexity 2 to the power 19 which is still doable. But moreover we will use these observations to handle large composite S-boxes in a very efficient way as follows. So we also found that if a composite S-box is simply a vector of T smaller sub S-boxes, then the spectrum point lambda of the case vector b of such large S-box would be simply equal to the product of corresponding spectrum points of smaller b vectors of individual sub S-boxes. So that if for each sub S-box we pre-compute all possible spectrum values for the pairs of K and lambda, then the spectral probing of the large composite S-box is very simple, it is simply computed by T-table lookups and T-minus one multiplications. Let me give an example how this all may be used. So for all basic S-boxes like S0 and S1 in TOOC we pre-compute lookup tables that contain spectrum values for all pairs K and lambda. Then assume the composite S-box is expressed as a number of linear transformations R and Q applied in between the parallel sub S-boxes and we will approximate that composite S-box by a large matrix M times X. Then for any spectrum point K of the approximation noise of such a composite S-box we derive intermediate indices K prime and lambda prime. Then the spectrum value of the composite S-box approximation or the noise variable at the point K will be then the product of subspectrum points in corresponding lookup tables that we have pre-computed earlier. So this is a very efficient way to probe the spectrum of a composite S-box without actually having to construct the spectrum itself. Coming back to the final step of TOOC analysis, recall the expression for the total noise as above in the first bullet. We will try to align peak values of sub noises in some position K in the spectrum. Then the expression for the spectrum value of the total noise in the location K can be expressed as given in the second bullet. So we then need to search for a pair K and lambda where the product of those spectrum values is maximized and thus achieving a large bias of the of the total noise. Note that the involved variables are 32-bit long, so we cannot really make an exhaustive loop on K and lambda as it would be then 2 to the power 64. However, we can use the spectrum of the noise N1 to search for promising candidates of lambdas and where the spectrum values are the largest. Then we can also search through the spectrum of the noise N2 for candidates of the index K. We then do an exhaustive search over all pairs K and lambda from the two lists of promising candidates and compute the complete spectrum value of the total noise for each pair K and lambda. For probing the S-box approximations, we utilize the results from the previous slide and do it efficiently in a constant time by using a number of small lookup tables. When the best pair K and lambda is found, then we then construct the matrix M such that lambda is exactly equal to K times M. Note that here we can actually synchronize 32 largest spectrum peaks with the same matrix M, but then in this case all K indices and lambda indices must be linearly independent. In the end, we verified our results by applying the derived matrix M and performing the construction of complete distribution tables of the S-box approximations and other involved noise distributions. The result confirmed that we actually got a distinguishing attack on soak of complexity around 2 to the power 236, which is faster than exhaustive key search. We think that presented spectral techniques may also be useful in analysis of other algorithms, not only stream ciphers, but also block ciphers. We believe there could be other improvements to our results and we encourage future research on these topics. Thank you all for your attention and listening my talk.


America, this is stink tick away, I'm Jay Fiedel, standing in for Tim Appichella, he's on travel. And we're talking today in what now America about Mike Pence and our title Pence speaks about January 6th and he says that Trump is wrong. He distances himself from Trump. What does this mean? Winston, what does this mean? Oh, Winston Welch, Cynthia Thinclare and Karen Buzzard. Okay, welcome to the show, you guys. Winston, what does this mean when Pence gets up and says this and I thought he was a Trumper, but maybe not and maybe he's more an anti-Trumper these days than he ever was. What do you think? I'm not sure I would ever put Mike Pence in the category of anti-Trumper. He told the line so as such a obedient, well, Vice President, let's just say, didn't say anything about any egregious action the entire time, although apparently they were, behind the scenes things where he said, oh, I can't in good conscience bear this man's actions or words leading up to the election even, but for whatever reason he decided to, let's not say turn the other cheek, but go for a different political reality and that seems to be what he's doing now. Now I don't wanna be cynical, but it doesn't seem that just the slightest sort of wording that says someone may have been wrong in his interpretation of the Constitution is pretty milk toast, but the media was all over because it was the first real indication from this man after a year that he's realized and willing to say publicly. And it's a coordinated effort because it's followed up rather immediately by Mitch McConnell, which I was actually, that was actually more meaningful for me, but both of them taken together, I think show the beginnings that there is a significant portion of what we used to consider to be the Republican Party or that calls itself the Republican Party that says we have to shut ourselves of this fealty to one another. But you're saying this is one of those points of light that give us pause to think that maybe the Republican Party is changing to a more responsible party, are you saying that?  I mean, it was just turning the corner. And so maybe we'll see what happens if it keeps going down that road and shines the light more, but honestly, with Mitch McConnell, what did he, he was very clear yesterday or it might've been the day before, by this time where he said, let's make no mistake about that this was an insurrection designed to stop us from carrying out basic, legitimate functions and overthrow of the election. And I think that was, he said that right after the coup or the insurrection on January 6th. And so it's like, a broken clock is right twice a day. So in this case, kind of the broken speaker or house Senate minority leader is right twice a year or so, given about a year later that he's willing to stand up and say this, but I think there's probably been so much internally where people have come up to him and said, hey dude, we need a shield here. And the Donald doesn't like you anyway.  So why don't you stand up and say this so that at least we can have some cover when we go back home to whatever districts that we're in where they are moderate district, where there are people really want to go back to a principle Republican party that's not based on personality and say, let's run on principles. And I think that's what this is going towards. And I think, yeah, it may be this daylight. And who knows what's gonna be coming out in the next few weeks or months with the January 6th. Well, nobody knows what's gonna happen honestly.  And when he said, we don't need to go after Liz Cheney or Adam Kitsinger, this is wrong. This is not what the party that we're about. And we need to say this, and so did Mitt Romney, by the way, who was the standard bearer a few years ago. Of course, it's his niece that wrote the, but these are little points of light. These are little points of light. Cynthia, there's two vectors working here. One is the points of light that Winston is talking about. I guess that would include the, this is only legitimate political discourse that the GOP unanimously adopted in its sanctions, its rejection, its exclusion of Liz Cheney and Adam Kitsinger. But at the same time, this vector is going the other way. Vectors which, various governors are adopting Republican governors or legislatures. There's a whole movement in the country to reject any vaccine mandates or mask mandates. And they're politically driven. You could not change my mind about that. They're politically driven, clearly. So these two vectors are working and we are going to see how they play. And you can think that these points of light will prevail but you can also think that these politicization of every issue you can think of in favor of the Trump position that that would prevail. So what are your thoughts about which one will prevail? These points of light persuasive to you? Those points of light were not at all persuasive to me. As a matter of fact, I noticed over and over and over that not even one single place where I looked in the news or listened mentioned the fact that Pence might have been doing this to cover his own batch. He tried to see if it was okay to turn everything over. He didn't mention that in that speech, right? How many months did he spend seeing if he could do it? Instead of just coming right out and saying that's not constitutional, I can't do it. So I think this is more about Pence trying to just to cover up his own stuff and possibly gave away going forward for him. He wants to turn for president. And this is what we'll get. Oh my God, I don't know why but I think I just had some gas. You know, Cynthia, we have been talking here on this show for a long time about the possibility that the Republican party will see the light. Now forgetting Pence for a minute, even forgetting Mitch McConnell's comment, is there a possibility now from all that we know that the Republican party is seeing the light? I don't see it. Liz Cheney is quoted as saying that the Republican party has to make a choice. We can either be loyal to our constitution or loyal to Donald Trump, but we cannot be both. And I think that's a very appropriate statement to make. And I think every Republican needs to ask themselves a bunch of questions. Because right now, if you're going to be loyal to Donald Trump, you have to remember that he's facing criminal and civil charges all over the place. Criminal charges in Georgia that trying to create election fraud, conspiracy to commit election fraud, with elections criminal, wait, sorry, it's not all the way on there, criminal solicitation. And then we've got the New York civil charges, which are tax fraud, mortgage fraud, bank fraud. It goes on. Then we've got New York criminal charges. We've got tax fraud, insurance fraud, scheme to defraud and falsifying business records. If any Republican, any Republican can still follow this plan, then they need to not even have any kind of position in politics. You mean that it would be irrational. And of course we have seen our fair share of irrationality, haven't we? Okay, so what comes to mind when you set out all those charges, it's the answer of the standard Republican answer. It goes this way. I hope I can do this right. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's all a big witch hunt. Yeah, yeah, yeah.  Does this make a bit of difference? Is all these charges against him?  It doesn't seem to bother the public when a demagogue goes to jail. Do you think it's really bothering the public now all these charges that Cynthia has recited? Unfortunately, it doesn't seem, I don't see any evidence of it bothering the public. I do see some evidence that maybe that there might be some interest in Trump running as a substitute for, you know, maybe that's what he's opening the door for himself as a presidential nominee. Because I think they're, from what I had heard on a PBS special, I think it was frontline. In fact, that the reason they delayed calling out the National Guard was because Trump was still in power and they were afraid that he would use it for his own purposes. So I think there is some behind the scenes, even though we may not always be aware of it, some realization that there needs to be some control of Trump, even if it's not publicly expressed. What does control mean, imprisonment? Imprisonment, making sure he does not get back in office. Again, if you remember, even the military generals had concocted a plan to make sure he didn't have control over the forces to use them against citizens in the US. On a scale of one to 10, what's your level of confidence that they would reject him a second time? 50-50.  Very good. So Winston, what difference does it make? Is Trump really cruising to a disaster for him? Or is, you remember the line about just spell my name right? He's still a very popular guy. He doesn't have Twitter, but you hear about him every five minutes. And a lot of people still swear by him. And it's not clear at all to me that any of this is really damaging his prospects with them. What about you? Do you feel that he would be a viable candidate in 2024? Well, you know, Donald Trump and Trumpism isn't going anywhere. I mean, to say that it's not disappearing, it's taken root in our society. It's everywhere. We see this. And I think that what the appeal is somehow on some level, and we're going to be dissecting this for 100 years, is what does it really represent when you try and get down to the core of it? I don't have a lot of good answers. There's everything from mass hypnosis to just a basic distrust of American government that's gone on for centuries. Or elitism, it's a hope. It's people losing their jobs. It's society changing. It's America changing. It's all of that. And much more, but it's not going away. In fact, I think it's the hydra. It doesn't matter if Donald Trump is the president or not. He has acolytes that are much more willing to step up across the board. But we're also seeing people standing up and saying, no, that's not it. I saw Joe Manchin said that there's, what was the exact words that he said that electoral count act reform will absolutely pass. So these senators and Congress folks realize that we can't have these fiascos of everybody suing all the time and trying to figure out, does the vice president have the ability to overturn this and whatnot? So it's in their interest as well, just to not have chaos. And I think Mitch McConnell has recognized that you had Susan Collins coming out and saying something we would expect that from Susan Collins and also Lisa Murkowski. But those are outliers and they always have been. However, every voice makes a difference there. And when you look at the polls internally, support for Donald Trump is still very high among Republicans. It's over 40% approve of him and what he's done and said and how they ignore his behavior somehow. They turned a blind eye to it. But when you ask the same people, do you want them to be running in 2024? The answer is different. They said, he's come, he's done his work. He's gonna work from behind the scenes. He's gonna raise a lot of money. He's still gonna be a kingmaker, but basic and we will count out to him to different degrees. You're still not seeing a lot of breakaway from the Rubios and the Cruises and a lot of other people that might- No, they're afraid of him. They're afraid of him. And once more, I think his influence, your point is well taken, his influence is growing. Look at what's happening in Canada over the politicization of public health. Extraordinary. The whole country isn't not about it. And it's Canada. I thought those guys were more rational than we, but not- When you look at Canada though, I mean, a lot of that is, they're connected at the hip to America and it's possible not to spill over, but when you really dig down in there, while there may be deep seated resentment against some things about the vaccine mandates, they're getting a lot of money from abroad. And when you look at, if you actually do the reading in there, nobody likes to be imprisoned in their house and restrictions that we've had from COVID. These are a public necessity that we are now deciding whether or not we still need to keep them. Let's not forget COVID deaths yesterday or this week are at a year high. We'll have a million people in this country pretty soon. I mean, right this week, now they're going down certainly, hopefully, but who knows what's coming down. Well, you have another mutation in bingo. So, I was talking to these guys before you got on the meeting, Cynthia, I'm telling them about the election of 1896. This was a contention between the populist movement, William Jennings Bryan, you like history, right? And McKinley, William McKinley. And the populist movement was the hinterland. It was the rural parts of America that were very resentful of the capital concentrations in New York and elsewhere in the cities. We felt that those guys were pushing them into poverty that were responsible for all these business cycles and all the angst and trouble that the middle America had. And so this was a big attempt of a movement that had been growing for 20, 30 years to unseat the capital concentrations in New York, you know, the pure part morgans and the carnagies and the railroads and the steel and all that. And we of the country really thought that the populist movement would win what it lost because money talks. Citizens United talks, okay? The difference between that election and the elections coming now is that in those days and ever since until Trump there was a peaceful transition of power. Now that is an issue. So my question to you is assuming that we have the same kind of bifurcation of the country, it's a similar kind of division of the country now, but assuming also that we have lots of confusion and lots of contention about who won, that whether the count was right, whether the public could properly vote with confidence in the system, whether the courts would respect that. What do you think is gonna happen this year? Eight months away? Ooh, that's a big ask. Cause things seem to change every day. And if we can have some sort of, accountability happen with some of these people that have broken the law, so egregiously broken the law, then maybe things will change and come around. And I think people will start falling away from that whole scene of that Donald Trump has been sort of leading forward. I know that the DHS just put out a statement yesterday on the domestic terrorism threat. That's part of this whole thing, right? And it says, the United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with faults or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories and other forms of mis or dis and mal information or MDM, introduced and or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. As long as we've got that at this level, I think that there's no way to know for sure and there's no way to change any of it. So I think that that's gonna make a big difference. Go ahead. What about, as Winston mentioned, what about the select committee? They're giving us pieces of what they've learned that appears in the newspaper. They're about to start live hearings on live TV. It's gonna be something like the McCarthy hearings maybe or Watergate, you know, it's gonna be a public spasm over this.  They've already come out that are shocking. We're gonna find out that he was, that Trump was engaged in a real live conspiracy, that he was the center of it, that he was attempting to manipulate the votes, the evidence, he was thinking of doing violence with the National Guard and the military in general. I mean, it was a whole nine yards. He was, I think that's gonna come out and we're all gonna hear about it and the four of us are gonna be outraged beyond outrage about it, but other people maybe in the middle of the country, the Trump followers, they're not gonna be outraged. They're either not gonna believe it or they're gonna believe it and say, eh, so what? He was just trying to hold on to his seat. Do you think that what comes out of that, even assuming the worst of it, the most horrendous conspiracy and military coup and violation of every principle and every rule of the constitution is gonna make a difference in this election? I hope so. And like I said, accountability is, I mean, did you ask me that? Was that for me? Yes. Okay, I hope so. And I think that it's again, accountability. And if we don't have it, then nothing's gonna change and there will be no difference. And yes, that same twisted mentality will still reign in these people's minds until they realize that their thinking was wrong and they realize that they were falling for a lot of misinformation until we can do something about this misinformation, nothing is going to change. And that's, in my mind, the very most important thing that we need to try to address. Well, that's a great segue to you, Karen. Misinformation, disinformation, social media and the failure of what you might consider the legitimate media to address this, to cover it, to speak truth to power, to make it clear to all of us what's going on. Are they doing a good job or are they pulling the rug out from under us? No, I don't think they're doing a particularly good job. I think that they are really not presenting what the American public needs to know. And there's still a lot of splintering of the news channels to different sides. They're not fully covering things and they cover things at specific angles that even I think this Russian conflict with Ukraine is being covered in a biased way. But I think there's a distress of the media. But one thing I did hear was an interview which I thought was very interesting with Brad Raffensperger or whatever his name was, the Secretary of State of Georgia. And he said in the Georgia election most people did not vote for Biden or Trump. They voted down ballot. They didn't want anything to do with national politics. They just voted for local politicians. And I think it would be interesting to see if that was true else in other states because I think that's really where the hope lies is the down ballot ticket or the local elections because people are very discouraged, I think at the national level with basically the Senate and the House basically kind of checkmating each other so there's no action on anything. People just get fed up with that. So I think that the real action needs to be at the local level for the parties at this stage or for the Democratic Party. Yeah, and Harrington, what you're saying is that the parties, and I'm speaking now of the Democratic Party has lost its ability, its mojo, its togetherness to deal with what's happening. This is an opportunity for them to lead, to galvanize and they're not doing it. No, I mean, I think that to see it as the last election as purely about Trump or Biden is possibly a mistake. I think it was just a disillusion with national politics. So a lot of people, at least in Georgia according to them didn't vote for either of the top candidates. They just, they had more people voting down ballot than they had people voting for either the top ticket people. You know, Winston, I wanna go around for last comments, but I wanna ask you a question too though and you can go beyond it if you want. And that is, so we've seen these points of light. We've seen some of these statements made recently, but largely the GOP is in lockstep. And I just wonder, you know, what it would take A to have more defections a la Cheney and Kinziger. We don't really see that. We see a few comments, but nothing like a mass defection. What would it take to generate a mass defection? And B, would a mass defection, how would a mass defection work? How would it affect the elections coming soon? Oh, well, people are waking up, Jay.  That's why you support that or, you know, you're conservative and so, but these days it's become, we're so manipulated as I think Cynthia was mentioning about, when you're talking about the legitimate news. I mean, what's our newspaper, which I find a reasonable newspaper, has about 150,000 people it goes out to in our state population of 1.5 million. The legitimate news in these days is TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and their friends. And if you see it on there, and they have so finely manipulated us to put us in little echo chambers and to feed us whatever narrative is that we think that we wanna hear or that we don't even know that we wanna hear because it's so subconscious that they're pressing buttons based on something we pressed of two likes or whatever. And they're very sophisticated.  I don't know, they got really sophisticated algorithms. We're just data, aren't we? We're just data, we're just data. We're manipulatable, that's not a word, people who then vote or don't vote as the case may be. So it basically, it's just getting back out there and rediscovering our humanity, our common interests.  They just want the job done. And they're tired of fighting. They understand as opposed to what Karen was saying that they gotta participate in the national conversation. I think Karen's maybe right in there. I mean, really it's just about locally. Do you think that Mitch McConnell has you on speed dial? Does he care?  And I don't know, you remember the olden days when your mom used to send you next door for an egg or a cup of milk when she was baking something? When was the last time you went to your neighbors to borrow an egg? Maybe we need to start the borrow an egg campaign across the country so that we get to know our neighbors again. There's just normal human beings. That's gone the other way. Cynthia, I'd like you to deal with this. Ideally it's a national conversation, but it's not, as Karen said. And I guess the question is, it strikes me that this is a kind of reality show. It's all theatrics. And I hate to use the word propaganda here in these United States, but it is largely that social media and the like and these political officials get up and they're really playing to the house. They're playing to the national house. It's almost like the delegation doesn't have that much to say about it and local government doesn't get involved. And local people don't really care. They think it's beyond them or as Karen said, tired of it. But it gets worse because it's not only a reality show for the country, it's a reality show for the world. It was Putin or somebody commenting on what Putin was doing to say that Biden's future depends on what he does, how well he succeeds in Ukraine. And if he fails in Ukraine, he will never be able to live up to it. He will be done politically. And I don't know if that's true and I don't like your opinion about that, but that does demonstrate that this echo chamber is not limited to a conversation within our borders. This is a global conversation and it affects the politics within our borders. You agree? I do, I absolutely agree. I believe that there has been a lot of reporting on the rise in dictators and autocrats and it's like everywhere. And so maybe what Putin's doing is for that very reason because we know that he has been focused on destroying America, tearing us apart. He's been focused on that for a long, long time. And he's also said he wants Ukraine back in Russia. He wants to reunite the Soviet Union. He has said that from day one. And he's also said that he wants to destabilize America since day one. Those are two things that tell me, we know why he's doing what he's doing right now on the border in Ukraine. And yes, it is important how Biden handles this and how the world handles this. We see President Macron going and talking to him at the end of the 30-foot table. And you wonder how intimate are these discussions when they're 30 feet apart? Why are they bilateral? Why is it just one leader going to see him? Why isn't there a crowd from the EU and from NATO going to see him? That's very troubling. Thank you, that was my next thing that I was just gonna say. Why is he there all by himself? That's exactly what I was gonna say. And so I feel that that is so important for NATO to stand together right now. For America's sake and for the world, also for democracy all around the world, right? So all that accountability is the most important thing in my mind anyway. And I believe it is the number one barrier wall from being able to make any kind of progress. We get the misinformation tells us, oh, he's not really guilty. Well, we need to find out the proof that shows that he is. And until we have that, so I think January 6th committee, it's really important. I wanna, is it closing time? Can I do more closing? It is closing time, but go take another 30 seconds and show you something. Okay, well, this is the newest thing that's come out from January 6th and from other places too. And that is the National Archives and Records Administration, NARA, set it between 15 boxes of White House records and other items that were stored in Mar-a-Lago. So there is an act, the Presidential Records Act of 1978 that says they cannot take anything away or destroy anything. So we've got Daniel Goldman, who is the guy who was the, he was the lawyer. Impeachment, yeah. Lawyers. So he said, this is a crime and would be pretty easy to prove with a few grand jury subpoenas to witness of his document destruction. Nobody heard what I say to that? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Another part of the witch hunt, no? Well, this is the important thing that comes out of that. In section B of that act, it says whoever does that is disqualified from holding any office under the United. Oh, very good, good. Good, hold that thought, yeah. Hold that thought and see, and easy to prove, let's do it. So all this other stuff is so hard to prove and have to go against all these other things. They're already trying to disqualify this guy, Madison Colley, I think, or Colley Madison on the basis of the 14th Amendment, section three. So this is gonna be a big thing in the courts going forward. So Karen, I have to ask you a question again about public opinion to close and then you can make any statement you want. If we know that public opinion is formed not only by these media that we've been talking about but also by entertainment. And a lot of people in the time of COVID sit at home and watch cable TV and they watch what's being offered. It strikes me that there's an awful lot of material out there these days about what happened in Germany in the 30s, you know, the Nazi movies are proliferated all through cable entertainment and various other examples of outrage, of human rights, of atrocities, of dictators. It's just a lot of stuff. And I wonder if you think this affects people. At the same time, there's a lot of movies out there with violence and vengeance. And we know this helps, I mean, I know anyway, this helps establish public opinion. So you have various things coming over the entertainment and people don't watch the news nearly as much and the news is not as persuasive at some emotional level as all this entertainment. How is this affecting public opinion today? In other words, for accepting violence but also for showing what happens in case you get picked up at two o'clock in the morning because you didn't part your hair correctly. Well, I think in terms of my view of the movies, I think Hollywood made a huge error, in my opinion, going to these Marvel comic superheroes whether it's good versus, it simplifies the world, good versus evil.  I've got the CSG or whatever they're called, which to me are horrid. And they don't seem to able to produce movies about ordinary people. You have to actually watch foreign movies to see dramas about people and their relationships. So it's like they've forgotten that, you know, we can have relationships in this country. It's all about these fantasy heroes and evil people. And I think that does affect splitting the world into good versus evil. Even with this affair with Putin, I don't think it's, you know, us, good, them, evil. It's much more complicated than that. But I think there's a tendency in the press to portray it that way. Okay, we're out of time, but Winston, simply because you're in the minority of gender here among the three of guests, I'm gonna allow you one more, one more close. So the apologies to Cynthia and Karen, okay? You can, but you can sort of summarize all this if you can and say welcome back to Cynthia and welcome to Karen and whatever else you like. Welcome to Cynthia and Karen, exactly. You know, the title of the show was that there's some daylight being spread between Mike Pence, who was so, so close and so involved in this at good, bad or otherwise. Mitch McConnell and other leaders and spokespeople, the old guard of the party that are starting to speak up.  I think candidates that there's gonna be certainly those that inflame that and people that wanna join in on the drama wagon, but there's a huge number of people that are just tired of it.  They just wanna go back to having normalish sort of relationships and I think the candidates that reflect that are going to continue to be rising in the ascendant. I think we have good hope here. It's the slow turtle.  The basic underlying things about Trumpism is not going to go away. We need to address those as we change as a nation and try and figure out what that means. But for right now, I would say, keep the slow steady going so that we can get back to normalcy. Okay, and closing, I wanna thank you all. Winston, Cynthia, Karen. I also wanna tell you that at the beginning of Trump's administration, the play Hamilton opened on Broadway. And in that play, if you recall, they criticized Trump. So he refused to go and made some stink out comments about it. Pence, however, went. And of course, he was recognized by the audience and they came to ask him for a comment. And his comment was completely different to Trump. His comment was, I'm into the First Amendment. This is a wonderful play. This examines our democratic roots and I don't feel the same way that Trump feels about this play. And that he distinguished himself even early on. I'm not saying that he's been a good vice president or a protector of our nation, but he is different than Trump. And maybe there are other people in there too that are different and can break away if only they had the opportunity. Thank you, Winston. Thank you, Cynthia. Thank you, Karen. See you next time. Aloha. Aloha.


Hello, everybody. Welcome to Esoteric Atlanta. My name is Bryce. I am super, super, super excited about the interview that I did early this morning with David Cohen, who is from Australia. David is a new friend of mine. I met David through Catherine Edwards. We met probably about a month ago with our first round table, and we've done a couple of round tables since then. And David and I got into communication off of camera, and I'm so excited to have him here on my channel for a one-on-one so that you guys could get to know David better. As I say in this episode, I really believe David was probably a philosopher in a past life because he is so attuned to the bigger picture of what's going on. And he has such an interesting insight into the complexities of our timeline right now. David is also a very, very talented musician. And on top of all of his work during this great awakening, he is also starting a new podcast soon that is focusing on artists. Now, because of topics that we talk about in this episode together, I went ahead and placed this episode on Rumble just to be on the safe side. I thank you guys for your patience, as you know, a lot of us have to put some of our episodes over on Rumble in order to work around some of the boundaries that have been placed on us on this platform. We know that the battle is on this platform because this is an information war. So I appreciate you guys working with us and always following those links over to the full episode. But before you do follow the links over to the full episode, please look down the description box below and go ahead and give David a subscribe. He will definitely be coming back on my channel. He, as most of the guests that come on my channel, he has unlimited invitation. He can come on whatever, whatever he wants because I do consider people that come on my channel to be my actual friends, as you guys are as well. And so hopefully he will be back soon. And next week, we will be doing another roundtable with Catherine and Medina. So go ahead and follow that link down below to watch the full episode with David Cohen.


Last call. It's now time for Member Statements, the Leader of the Opposition. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This year marks the 118th anniversary of the Federated Women's Institute of Ontario. It marks 118 years since Adelaide Hoodless first began her campaign for domestic science education, inspired by the tragic death of her 14-month-old son.  It was because of Hoodless's tireless efforts and vision for reform that domestic science and sewing were first added to the school curriculum. Today, the Federated Women's Institute has over 3,500 members in 290 branches across Ontario. I know through my very good friend, Donna Jeb, who serves as President of the Women's Institute for Simcoe County and has been a member of that branch for over 30 years, that this organization has become much more than just about improving the home-making skills of women. While still firmly entrenched in its beginnings, today Women's Institute as well runs education and support programs and services, offers personal growth opportunities, health and community wellness projects and engages in government lobbying. In my writing, the Women's Institute sponsors two scholarships each year awarded to students pursuing post-secondary education who are active volunteers in the community. Let me take this opportunity to congratulate the Federated Women's Institutes of Ontario on the excellent work that they have done and on the many things they have achieved. I look forward to seeing the great things that the Institute will accomplish in the next 118 years and being a part of their growing success. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Member Stevens. Member from Timmins, James Faye. Thank you, Speaker. More and more people are waking up every day and realizing they're being gouged by the gas companies in this province as they are across this country. How do you explain that the price of the barrel has dropped about $50 a barrel and yet the price of gas keeps on increasing? Currently in Timmins, the price of gas is $1.14 a liter. We were paying $1.14 a liter when the price of gas was $80 a barrel. What gives? What gives is gas companies are gouging the public and we as legislators have a responsibility in order to protect consumers. If these gas companies are not prepared to do what is right and to make sure that the price of gas at the pump properly reflects the price of the barrel, then it is up to the province because we are the regulators of energy, not the federal government. They deal with the competition issue. We deal with the regulation issue. The province should do what new Democrats have said for a long time and do what we do with natural gas, do what we do with electricity, do what we do with a box of beer. If you can buy a box of beer in Cornwall and pay the same price up in Fort Francis, certainly to God, we can find a way to make sure that the price of gas in this province reflects the true price of the barrel, allowing companies to make a profit without gouging the pockets of drivers in this province. Thank you. Member Stevens, the member from Cambridge. Thank you, Speaker. As I've said in this House on several occasions, my riding of Cambridge is built on a foundation of manufacturing and I rise today to welcome a new manufacturing partner to my community. Chances are that if you're taking off or landing on a plane in Ontario, that plane's landing gear or part of it was manufactured in my community of Cambridge. Last Thursday, aerospace manufacturing Cambridge grew once again as I was in attendance at the inauguration of AeroDevTech's new Cambridge Manufacturing Facility along with the Minister for Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure. This new facility was built to accommodate a major new contract awarded by Boeing to supply complete landing gear systems for several Boeing aircraft. This state-of-the-art facility will result in the creation of 40 new highly skilled jobs that presents a total investment of approximately $54 million including $7 million of support from the province of Ontario. During our tour, I noted that there was one machine that uses such specialized skills that only about a dozen people worldwide are qualified to operate it. I'm proud of our government that's taking a proactive role in helping ambitious companies to grow and create jobs in Cambridge. Speaker, I'm delighted to work and welcome AeroDevTech to Cambridge's business community. They joined Cambridge's diversified economy and its growing technology and advanced manufacturing sector. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Member from Nipissing. Thank you, Speaker. I stand today to pay tribute to one of the most respected community builders in my riding, Mr. Bruce Goulay. Bruce served as North Bay's Mayor from 1971 to 1973. Before becoming Mayor, he served as an Alderman and Deputy Mayor. I am privileged to be able to call him a mentor and my friend. Now, 92 years of age, Bruce was recently one of the 50 Canadians recognized for their contributions to civic life and duty in our country. As part of our country's special celebration of the 50th anniversary of Canada's flag, Bruce was presented with a special Canadian flag on behalf of Prime Minister Harper by our Member of Parliament, Jay Aspin, at a ceremony last week that I was privileged to attend. I believe Bruce spoke for all of us in attendance when he said if there was a city within Ontario that embodies the best in citizenship and public service, it would be North Bay. Speaker, I couldn't agree more. On behalf of the residents of Nipissing, I want to say to Bruce, thank you for your years of dedication and commitment to North Bay, my friend, and for your steadfast leadership within our community. Thank you for everything, Bruce. Thank you. Speaker, I rise today to acknowledge the worldwide event of International Women's Day on Sunday, March 8th. As we know, International Women's Day is our opportunity to celebrate the progress and achievements in women's economic, political and social equality. It is vital that we celebrate our achievements while continuing to work towards equity for all women around the world. For my part, I am proud of the strides new Democrats have made under the leadership of the National Women's Day in promoting and electing women candidates. The NDP has the highest percentage of women elected out of any political party at 51%, and that is an accomplishment that we can celebrate. However, we must balance the celebration of our achievements against the significant obstacles that still remain in almost every country, even prosperous countries like Canada. Here at home, we see the persistence of violence against women, lack of pay equity, and the underrepresentation of women in positions of decision-making and leadership, all of which demand our reflection. And around the world, women are still facing enormous challenges with poverty, health, economic independence, education, and human rights. If our moral imperative does not compel you to action, then perhaps economic indicators can. It is widely recognized that women have the potential to be the engine of economic and development success, and now is the time to take action. This March 8th, I encourage all members of this house to celebrate International Women's Day and to reflect their own commitment to equality of all women. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you. Member Stevens and then we're from New Market Aurora. Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. It's an honor to stand in the house today to represent the great writing of New Market Aurora, to bring awareness to an event happening in York Region. On the evening of March 5th, I'm participating in the second annual 360 Experience. This will give me and other 50 and 50 other community leaders an opportunity to spend a night in the cold to experience just a bit what homeless youth face every night in York Region. The number of homeless youth in York Region is staggering. An estimated 300 youth have on any given night no safe place to lay their heads. They are homeless. For over 25 years, 360 kids have given the youth of York Region the opportunity to move from the street to homeless shelters while offering counseling, positive mentorship programs and employment opportunities. Mr. Speaker, the name 360 Kids highlights the approach the 25-year-old organization takes to assist at-risk youth. It recognizes these youth need a wide range of supports to help them rebuild their lives. I want to congratulate 360 kids on exceeding their fundraising goal of 50,000. The last time I checked their website they had hit 65,000 and were still growing. Mr. Speaker, homelessness, especially youth homelessness is an issue near and dear to my heart. I'm participating in this event to help the association and to raise awareness for youth homelessness in York Region. One day it will be eradicated. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Speaker. The actions of this liberal government are threatening healthcare services in the Quinney Region. Today at Quinney Healthcare it operates hospitals in Belleville, Trenton, Picton and Bancroft announced plans to eliminate its $8.5 million funding gap. The reduction forced by this liberal government will result in the acts falling on 10% of the nurses at Quinney Healthcare hospitals. Those 58 nurses or so were responsible for 88,000 hours of nursing care at our local hospitals. The reason given for these cuts is the government and Quinney Healthcare have said they're moving toward an interprofessional staffing model. The government's also said that it's moving more services back into the community, Mr. Speaker, except the numbers don't back that up either. A spokesperson for the nurses at Hastings Manor and other long-term care facilities in the area says these facilities are understaffed and the government has said don't expect any more money. Nursing advocates have stated that home care services in our community can't be delivered in a timely manner. Patients in Quinney deserve proper healthcare services, not nursing cuts without a home care safety net, not understaffed hospital floors. That's what happens when you blow billions of dollars on things that aren't priorities. It's clear that more money needs to be invested in frontline healthcare providers, but the liberal government continues to invest in bloated bureaucracies and not tackle the big issue which is the need to streamline our administration. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Member from Durham. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. In December I had the pleasure of meeting two very passionate individuals who hail from my riding of Durham and they brought to my attention a very important cause and a very important issue. These representatives from Epilepsy Durham Region are part of a very small team who are doing very big work. I wanted to rise to bring to the attention of this House their effort to showcase March's National Epilepsy Awareness Month. Epilepsy Awareness Month is an opportunity to acknowledge the one in 100 Canadians who are affected by epilepsy and the more than 100,000 Ontarians with this condition they will be standing in solidarity throughout the month as well as on March 26th when I encourage everyone both constituents and members of this House to wear purple to mark Purple Day a national day of action for epilepsy. Together we can be more conscious of the condition and help to end the misconception around it. I am proud to see such a passion for such a cause in my riding. I am proud Epilepsy Durham will be hosting many events throughout the month as a private pancake breakfast two weeks ago in Bowmanville. I want to thank Epilepsy Durham for their hard work and encourage everyone to go to the website epilepsydurham.com to learn more and to get involved. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Mr. Speaker, the member from Ottawa or the other? Mr. Speaker, I was proud to be in attendance of the Orleans Chamber of Commerce 13 13 annual business excellent awards. We had 13 key awards winners who I have taken the time to congratulate individually. There were many wonderful finalists and I want to express my gratitude to all local businesses for their hard work in our community. Small businesses are the lifeblood of Orleans. I can say that as a former business owner the work that is done by the Chamber of Commerce in Orléans is extremely vital to foster entrepreneurship and economic growth in our communities. I am always very proud to celebrate the exit of local companies and their initiatives. For the dynamic and innovative business climate in Orleans to help them continue thriving. I have to take this opportunity to wish all the best of success to the former Executive Director Jamie Kwan as she moves on to a new opportunity and to welcome the new Executive Director Mr. Dina Epel Thank you. Thank you Mr. President. Thank you. Thank all members for their statements.


So, as a dating and relationship coach, I frequently get messages from women who have been in relationship, some very short lives, some much longer where they're feeling a significant amount of frustration from the men, predominantly in the area of their non-committalness, non-committalness. And this is true right from the very beginning of the dating process and certainly midway through the relationship process. And I say midway because at some point what's the point of being in a relationship if you don't have a desired destination? Now, I say that for those who are genuinely seeking fully committed relationships and partnerships versus those that are just happy with a casual relationship or friends with benefits. People are more than welcome to do those kind of relationships, situationships or whatnot. But I'm leaning into the frustration that women share with me frequently about those men who aren't basically non-committal. In other words, they're not really leaning into the deeper depths of a relationship. And for a variety of different reasons, and I know you've heard things like the men's testosterone levels does this and men are hunters.  I know you hear all this rhetoric, but I want to go into the deeper reasons why this happens. And I think it's because we no longer live in an environment, especially since the invention of birth control where predominantly if you wanted to get laid, you had to get married. So there was an ultimate commitment and now little or no commitment is needed to basically have sex. And in fact, because of these devices now, there's an ample supply of ready people that will hook up on a regular basis and get some of the basic needs met. And what's worse for a lot of men is these little devices also allows them to connect with pornography. And I don't want to get into a whole discussion on that, but there's an absolute disconnect going on for so many men out there. And disconnect for women as well, because of technology, I don't think we humans were really prepared for this level of technology. When you think about it, for 200,000 years, I mean, 200,000 less 100 years ago, we had no electricity. Think about that for 200,000 years since Neanderthals up until 100 years ago, we didn't have electricity. So the basic mating principle was you chose people within your tribe to mate with. Now, because of these devices, you could connect with anybody around the world, having a perceived relationship with someone. And I'm just going off on a tangent here because I want to get back into why you need to test men and how to really take your relationship to the next level. And why you need to test them before having sex because that's what I'm leaning into talking about today. Why am I talking about this?  And if it doesn't work out, okay, on to the next one, and that one doesn't work out on to the next one, and that doesn't work out on the next one on after a while, that will wear on an individual's emotional. What's the word I'm looking for stability, if you will, if you've had one disappointing situation ship after another because it's I think it's presumptive to think that all men are the same. Repeat that to presume all men are the same. And I was recently pondering this idea that I want to share with you today that there are basically three different types of men who are actively dating in the midlife crowd basically three types of men that are actively dating in the midlife crowd. So I want to put on my trusty glasses. And I want to share with you these three types. There's basically the user, which represents about 20% of the population and this is just made up by me. There's this spenders. That's made up about 60% of the population. And then there are the growers and the builders. Okay, so let me talk about the users. These are the men typically that are the love bombers. Okay, they come on ridiculously strong. They're driven by their own needs and not necessarily caring about your needs. Okay, these also include player so love bombers players. These are the users. These are the people that take from other people. They mask it though beautifully. They make and oftentimes make a woman feel so precious, so special, very much like the Tinder swindler. And then their goal is to use them not necessarily always nefarious like a Tinder swindler or whatnot, but certainly for their own benefit. But they come across so charming, so special, so unique. It's very difficult to say no, because who doesn't want to feel a level of being special to feel special is certainly a very intoxicating emotion to experience. And just because I talk about men experiencing limerence women can experience limerence as well limerence is extreme infatuation. When you add lust with that there's oftentimes the biological drive to chase the sex, because you've been told men are hunters well what are they hunting. Oftentimes they're hunting sex. Men don't walk around going, I want a relationship I want a relationship let me let me get my bow and arrow for the relationship. No their bow and arrow is usually predicated on, you know, there's this belief that through sex men find love. I think there's this misconception for men that through sex they find love. Okay, a misguided subconscious perspective. So we've just talked about the users now I want to talk about the spenders these are the men that spend time with you they're spending time with you. And let me elaborate a little bit more on that. These are the men that seek connection companionship and coupling or sex. Okay, connection companionship coupling and or sex. But they're not clear about wanting a long term relationship or wanting a long term commitment, nor are they very clear that they genuinely want to take care of someone. These are men oftentimes that have gone through divorce gone through recent breakups. These are men that oftentimes are experiencing some level of chaos in their life. Maybe it's their professional life they maybe they have issues with their children. But there's a level of chaos going on in this person's life. That makes them want to spend time with someone, but not necessarily lean into deeper building deeper trust in the relationship because they don't know clearly if they want to take care of someone. Okay, now I'm going to talk about this 60% a little bit more, but I think it's important to give you the context of the third category. And that is the men who are growers and builders growers and builders.  Not it's not about the person it's about where they're at in their emotional capacity and while I say this is roughly about 20% of the male population, I could be a little bit generous there. But certainly I'm going to give the benefit the doubt and say it's about 20%. These are men that have some level of emotional maturity and they have their act together. I repeat that they have some level of emotional maturity and they have their act together. So why I'm sharing this now is I want to come back to the spenders because this is the tricky part about their spenders. Are these the men that are closer to the user category or are they closer to the grow and build category? And this is really tricky stuff because most of the time you're going to end up with a spender. It's very rare that you actually get to meet a grower or a builder.  These are rare men and when I say 20%, I might be very generous in that percentage. You have a better chance of getting a spender or a user than you do a grower or a builder. Okay. Now, if the spender is closer to the category of the grower builder, he's going to be more apt to want to do the heavy lifting in the dating process.  Eight Dates by Doctors John and Julie Gottman. This teaches you the mechanics to the healthy happy relationship. In addition, if these guys are spenders, in other words, they spend time with you, but they're more capable of growing than these are the men. You want to test all men to see which category they are in. I repeat that you want to test men to see which category they're in. Let me just and testing them, for example, is starting off by reading this book together. If he says no, then he's most likely a user or he's a spender who really isn't going to lean into a deeper relationship with you. By the way, there's a link to all the books I recommend and Jonathan recommend books. Before I forget, let me recommend my book.  A journey of personal development, self-help and spiritual work. SelfLoveTheBook.com. I highly recommend checking out my book. I would love if you'd give a review as well. If you've ordered the book and you haven't, please give a review.


Been trying to get this up for a while now. I finally got a set up where I could actually Stream for the first time before I had my my laptop. I couldn't stream on that But yeah, and now we're set up I got the webcam I got a Figured out how to kind of put together the stream, but I'm still learning so you know Don't Don't laugh at me if I'm messing up whatever I'm doing because I have no idea what I'm doing. I'm just clicking buttons But what I do know how to do is trade So y'all got any questions? Let me know Be happy to to give my thoughts On you know what I see a lot of the stuff with trading trading is all based on your perception So everybody's view of it could be different Nothing's ever set in stone. It all depends how you want to see it, you know people different people see different things These are the levels that we've been watching right here So this right here has been a nice little buy area or we've been picking up entering longs Anytime it goes down to this area and this one right here today got close enough I like the the 11,500 area to 11,600 So that's how you jumped in there You know, basically whenever I'm looking for entries. I'm just looking at what it's done in the past in the same area That's also a lot of support here. So What's up luck? Luckney 1995 was followed chipmunk Chipmunk Luckney. What's up y'all? Yeah chipmunk definitely man. Everybody everybody trades differently. So there's no, you know It's hard to To say what's the right because it's not it's not based on right and wrong you can't You know if a system and a way to trade works for you then it works for you, you know what I mean? It's not a It's not that you're wrong or another person's right, you know, because you don't find that out until after it's over over with you know, so For me personally, I like to trade price action. So I basically the main things I use is supporting resistance You know and I look for momentum and then I trade With the trend always I do not trade against the overall trend So as you guys can see if you zoom out a bit the overall trends been up So I have not taken any Any shorts like for me instead of taking shorts trying to bet against the trend I rather Just not be in a position. So I just Not I'll just not be in a position. I'll sell and then I'll wait for a better entry Basically, so like for example right here like as this went up went up went up I knew 12,000 was a point of interest where we get rejected So I was taking profits there and I entered a new trade above 12,000 But as soon as I saw a rejection I got out I stopped out and I just waited So I waited for this candle like you don't want to be in this big-ass mess. This is Crazy mess to get into you don't know which way is going. It's a gamble And then I let it I let it sit for a bit And they're on here probably is when I started thinking about getting back into trades around this this area right here main things that I trade is Bitcoin is my main thing to trade I trade it mainly on bit mechs. I like to do I like to trade with leverage. I usually trade no more than 10x. I feel like anything more than 10x You're more gambling than anything Tesla's just pull it up You see um the traded Paired up with Bitcoin or USD because they're always two different Things to look at. This is paired with Bitcoin. Yeah, if I'm looking at it I'm not in a trade on on this Obviously this right here is a resistance and let me see if you can see if you look back you can see this This has been a point of interest right here. I'll pull it up in USD right now Let me just look look over real quick at paired with Bitcoin But if you look at it right here you look at the past you see this is a point of interest So if I was trading this I already know like when I'm in this area As soon as it breaks out. I'm looking back over here.  Yeah, I could see I could see this running up Paired with Bitcoin I could see it running up still a lot more. It's at 3,000 Satoshi's Right now. Is that where it's at? Let me see. Yeah So it's always gonna be pullbacks. That's normal It's healthy. I Could definitely see it running back up to around this range 31 50 range probably 31 60 31 75 got a breakthrough there to get to 33 Let's check it out with USD so at USD to What 367 same thing man, I just I just look at the bigger picture. I like to trade in the four hour But if I'm analyzing something I usually start at one month And work my way from there The red indicator I'll go back to that chart now. Oh right here. I Believe this one is 20 there's a 20-day moving average Yeah, I'll pull up chain link now, too. But yeah, whenever I'm Analyzing a coin I do what's called the top-down analysis. I start at one month and I work my way down So I'll I also like Let me see. So there's definitely a point of interest And I go down to one week Like kind of see zoom into where it was getting stuck so 279 to three dollars three dollars is always any whole whole number is always major resistance and support the psychological It looks like it's gone up to Yeah, so see right as it got close over here to four dollars. It just rejected Damn, it rejected hard to it went all the way back down to to a dollar That's a huge rejection Yeah Yeah, man, we've been bro. My my group's been I've been running that trade group now I started my trade group in 2017 so we have been going since 2017 in the trade group man. Is it is it this a COVID rejection, but this one right here is a COVID rejection for sure It was already Rejected from before that looks like But it bounced back up at $1 Went up to what three dollars see all these Psychological resistances like that's always look at whole numbers They're always major factors So as it as it's getting close to its previous high It it's struggling there. So a breakthrough of four dollars. It could take off So if I was to trade this Let me zoom in a little bit more Yeah, so if I'm trading this I Because right here you can't really guess where it's gonna go So you're kind of in the middle like you're in the open. It could keep trying to push up to four or It could drop and it has if it drops it has all this space to drop till about 320 So if I'm buying here, I'm not entering where it's currently at. I'm looking to enter around 320 or around three dollars or 280 so I would set Entries at 320 three dollars and 280 probably and anything under that I'm selling and if I want to If it doesn't if it doesn't go down You also want to have an entry if it doesn't reach your support, which is a breakout entry I would be buying above four dollars or above previous high Previous has 395. Yeah, so I would set my buy above four dollars Do I think BTC will be hitting 20k mark? It's definitely gonna hit it now I don't I don't have a timing. I don't know, you know, I never try to try to predict What the price is gonna do and I would try to predict the future I just I just watched the price and I and I trade I trade based on price I don't trade based on predictions, you know what I mean? You don't want to have a bias in the market So you just want to you just want to trade with logic not emotion I feel like if you try to make predictions, you're you're gonna be biased towards the way that you're predicting So you're gonna be trading more emotionally than anything else Um Yeah So I don't predict prices. I I do believe it's gonna hit 20k when I don't know to hit 20k We have a lot of work to do because we we have to break through a few different areas Let's see Let's look at this In the monthly So as you can see we're almost at the highs of last year Last year's high was 13 920 So we have to break if like to go up from where we're at currently first We need 12,000 to hold if 12,000 does not hold we're gonna keep dropping back to where we've you know what we've been doing We need to break 12,200 so I think if we break 12,200 we could rally up to 13k Then we got to fight that 13k resistance And then we got to fight the all time the the high from last year from 2019 If we break the high from 2019 then our next resistance would be 15k like the 15 to 16k area if we break that Then we're gonna hit 20 now at 20. I think we're gonna get a hard rejection probably back to 1516 and then If we get the momentum again, we could we could definitely push past 20 I could definitely see that happening Sight do use to look at charts. I'm using trading view They have an app and that's the fastest way for me to to look at charts You could pay for it and you won't get all the little ads it does and you could add more Indicators, but because I don't use that many indicators this to trade it doesn't matter to me You love the breakout buys. I definitely love breakout buys man They're very simple and high probability Set-ups man, you got to look for the for the easy setups There's no point trying to To make life hard for yourself, you know, I mean People like to use a million indicators. I Don't I look for the for the easy setups Darren's been struggling at 400 Just cannot get a break not break through.  So we keep any stops So what I tried to do we tried to enter right here The 390 to 380 range and then of course it dumps completely. So stop this out again I was trying to play this this little support right here So when it came back down we entered and it dumped on us and then it came back up But yeah, so I like to trade Ethereum. I want to get back in but Where it's at currently you can't there's no entry here Cuz probably gonna be a fake out It's gonna keep and so the only entry really you have to either use a breakout entry Which is gonna be around the last high Most recent high was around that what 408 and what's this? This is 415 So, I don't know I do something like over 410 probably And then but yeah, then you have to be careful 415 it could get rejected like it did here So that's why I don't know it's a weird entry for Ethereum so if you're looking for support A support entry then you're looking down here, which is where we try to enter last time Which is around 390 to 380. See this is a A good support here 390 to 380 range Um, it's held all this time over here. It acted as a resistance right here That was just a bad dump or everything dumped there. So gotta just ignore that basically So yeah, so for Ethereum the way we're playing it, uh, we have to look for a breakout or a support entry I don't like where it's at right now Right now at this point. You're just in the middle of nowhere. So I don't like those entries What I'll say you guys trading Uh, we've done a couple trades on bch How do you guys feel about bch? We entered this one At 300 When it broke out We got to write it all the way up Took profit around 320 325 range Where'd it go up to? 326 yeah, so we took profit around 320 325 range stopped out under 320 and it dumped hard Yeah, 300 is a good entry for, uh, bch 375 nice Yeah, so for bch, I like the 300 area So you see how it's kind of in a range here I would wait for 300 again And have a stop So you're probably gonna have want to have a stop, uh, under the most recent low Which is around 290 So if your stop is 290 Yeah, you could do you could have a Risk reward of two to one at least two and a half to one Um, you're gonna risk $10 to make a possible 20 to 25 dollars So it's a decent trade to take All right CRX Let's go Let's take a look from the beginning of time for zrx Just like to see what it's done in the past Anytime you're you're gonna Look to enter something you got to see what's done in the past As you can see it I remember this when it took off like crazy and it just dumped See this resistance where it's it's basically at a resistant right now So it looks like the 42 mark 40 mark probably 42 42 is its resistance It's currently above it Let's go down to the daily That's probably 45 And 50 I'm sure yeah So it's just just before the 50 for zrx What do you mean waiting? Like you're holding it right now waiting for those targets to take profit Yeah, so the first number I'd be looking at is 50 50 Is always a very is a psychological barrier. It's always a psychological resistance So I'd probably be looking to take You're almost doubling your money at 50 cents So I'd be looking to take profits around the 50 area and then if I see a convincing breakout above 50 You could just buy back in but I like to take profits at certain spots at least a percentage of my profits Um in case it dumps. I want to buy in again Yeah, so 50 is a good point of taking profit And then the high here is 56 This range is 79 80 Oh, it's this over here 70 Yeah, so yeah, so this is basically the same numbers you're you're talking about. So I would do instead of 55. I do 50 70 Yeah, 50 70 And yes, it's always good to to take profit before the whole number the whole number is usually where it gets rejected So I take profit usually before so if 70 is resistance, I'm taking profit around 68 69 But it looks good though Just needs to break out.  That was a good entry though 33. We're 33. Yeah, it's down here. Yeah, that was a perfect entry So get xrp anybody in ripple This is bull flag right here See if I could Oh, this is terrible. I can't draw a straight line Bull flag right there So I'd be looking to uh, to buy a breakout above this Let's uh, look at Yeah, same thing same pattern That looks like 32 Yeah, 32 cents. So you could do a breakout breakout buy above that You could also enter around here With a stop under the low You might get stopped though So if you want to give yourself a little bit more room than under 27 cents But it looks like it's definitely uh consolidating preparing for a move It's on the daily too There right now it's at uh Oh, I should have to take this off It is at the 29 cents So it's battling the 30 cent whole number psychological resistance See if you look at right here Rejections all all around right here with support right here is just struggling with it indecisive When it broke through that's when I went up That's so I mean it above 30 cents is a goodbye You could also enter here With the stop like I said under 27 You could do that because this right here was like Panic sell bull flag So it's getting closer and closer to So if it continues doing this pattern it should be reaching its apex By the 12th So before the 12th, I would say it should be looking to to break out somewhere I don't know what they said it today is the 10th. Um, so in the next two days It could either break out or break down Due to the pattern The probability is a to break out So I will be playing the bullish side of this If I were to enter it I will be keeping an eye on it for sure Yeah, same pattern as um As ripple has Bull flag right now Mr. FRS Hey, man, I've been following you for a while Can you show step for step how you make the order for stop loss under 12k?  Yeah, no problem, bro Um, so that's for bitcoin So, I mean what what are you using? What are you trading on? So the because the first thing is you have you have to make a stop market order Um, you could do stop market or stop Limit order right now. It's at 12 000. So have you've already entered? um, so When when you when trading there's no exact numbers, you know, it's hard to explain to people But there's no exact numbers Um, I try to simplify everything as much as I can for you guys Um, but you have to remember these are just things to always keep in mind When trading there's no such thing as an exact numbers what there is is zones So you're always going to be Uh using zones versus exact numbers um so When I'm using a stop loss on a 12 000 on 12 k breakout If I'm looking to set a stop loss, I might I'm gonna be looking anywhere between 25 to 100 dollar from my entry price probably um So for this for 12 k so you could play it two ways If you don't mind stopping out And just continuing to enter it anytime it breaks out you can set up a pretty tight stop This this is what I would do if I'm gonna if I know I'm gonna be on the computer or You know somewhere where I have access to trading for the next few hours Where I'm gonna be watching it then I'll set up a tight stop Because uh, uh, if I if I stop out I could just enter back in if I'm going to bed I'm will probably set my stop a little bit wider Uh around the hundred dollar range of my entry If I'm gonna be around then I I don't mind setting it between 25 to 50 dollars from entry um I also use a lot of the times The most recent low to look for a stop So you have to kind of zoom into the price. So right now like the most recent low is 12,004 so I mean that's still over 12 k. So you don't want to use that So let's uh zoom in a little bit more to the one hour. What's the 2005 I'm gonna go into 30 minutes now because I'm just kind of looking for a spot where I could uh Where it's like a recent low where I could possibly put something. So maybe here we go like 11 So 11,000 this is the low for 11,986 So this is a 30 minute if you want to use a 30 minute low you can place it under there So I would place it around, you know, 11,980 This again, this is if I'm going to be sticking around for a while where I have access to making trades I'll I'll use like a 30 minute or I use a 15 minute usually like I'll use these two charts If I'm watching it if I'm at the desk watching it I'm using these two charts 30 minutes and 15 minutes for stop losses If I'm not going to be around like if I'm going to sleep then I'm using wider stops And remember I'm I'm re-entering the trade every time it goes back above 12,000 I'm re-entering the trade Because I don't mind taking the small losses Uh as I wait for the big winner.  What I do is I sell 25 percent at each target So at 12.2 25 percent So I'm gonna sell 20 25 contracts 12.4. I'm gonna sell 25 contracts 12.5. I'm gonna sell 25 contracts Now I have 25 contracts left At that point I'm holding that those the rest of that 25 contracts I call that uh, basically holding holding a runner for the moon So if it continues to just take off Then you're just going to keep making money on those profits On that on those contracts you're holding if not what what I do is I trail it with a stop loss So I have a stop under it And I'll I'll trail it behind usually behind the previous target. So if I hit 12.2 I'm gonna leave it under 12 still if I hit 12.4 Now I move the rest of my position once I hit the 12.4 Target I move the rest of my my position under 12.2 Once I hit 12.5 I move the rest of my position under 12.4 and so forth Once it goes beyond then I'll just hold everything of the 25 contracts I have left I'll just you know Slowly move it up as the price goes up And usually at the end of the last target Um, I usually use that as a new entry point for a breakout entry Um, but yeah the type of orders the way to set up the orders is with stops You have to use stop limits and stop market orders If you're gonna buy if you're buying going long you're gonna you're gonna buy and if you're going short you're gonna sell Did that make sense? Do you have any questions about that? Well, I would I would say If you wanted to use bitmex Um to trade with leverage Um, and I mean you could trade without leverage as well But only only move 20 of your capital to trade, you know what I mean? I mean don't put don't move all of your All of your bitcoin or all of your crypto Just use a percentage of your capital that you want to trade and just use you know keep that somewhere On an on an exchange where you can make quick moves I use Like I said, I use a vpn for bitmex Set to the uk The vpn I use is called wind scribe It is a free vpn I'll type it in the chat. Yeah, it's it's definitely annoying with all the Passwords and two factor authentication and all that it's annoying Just keep a small amount and you should be fine Um for the trades, I mean if it's bitcoin, I'm using 10x if it's anything else. I'm using 5x Yeah for outcoins, you don't want to go above 5x because they they move differently so 5x for like whenever I'm trading ethereum.  If you don't know what you're doing So longevity is the key when trading you want to set yourself up so that Even if you have a bad month, you can still trade next month. You know what I mean? Um, so That's why risk management is so so vital Um, you know risk management Is what's what's all involved in risk management is making sure that you're using the correct position size so if If you need if you don't have the link to the calculator, I have a position size calculator I'll send that to you send me a dm And I'll shoot it over um But you need to have the correct position size And you need to make sure that you're never risking more than five percent of your entire portfolio and five percent is on a Trade that you're extremely confident in so you you're always want to be between one to five percent five percent I only use if I'm like 100 confident, you know what I mean 99 percent Um, which is I never use I rarely use five percent. I'm usually and and it also Depends how big your cap how much capital you have so like before when I had under ten thousand dollars Capital that I was trading with then obviously five percent wasn't that much So I was closer to five percent on trades um as you grow over fifty k And beyond like you don't need to take that much risk anymore because you you already have a lot of capital to play with so even with Risk of two percent one percent two percent. You're still making a decent return on any trades you're taking um So I nowadays I only risk between one to two percent for trade If I'm feeling you know, uh Loose where if I'm feeling good about it. I'll go up to three percent I I haven't done a five percent I haven't taken put five percent risk on my capital in a long time though. I could tell you that One to two percent is where it's good for me.  We're we're coming close to uh, we've been live for about two hours Well, we've been live for about an hour and a half, but it took me half an hour to figure out how to get everything up and running um But yeah, I'm gonna wrap it up, man This was the first of many more streams. I definitely want to do a lot more like it like this um And as I was saying this bitcoin is currently dumping Um, it looks like he's getting rejected here on the five minute um, but I I I'm gonna do this at least I wanted to do it a few times a week possibly Um, I'm gonna be coming back with uh content for youtube And um, and yeah, man, we're gonna be putting out a lot of stuff. I'm excited About you know, what's what's going on with bitcoin right now where it's going Uh, the fundamentals are great Uh, the hype is coming back up Yeah, man, and we've we've been buying I don't know if you I don't know how long you guys been in the The pay group but when it was you know, when it dropped to three 4k, I was telling everybody to buy man You'll be traveling. All right chipmunk. I appreciate you coming by man and stopping by hanging out with me for a bit Love to talk to you guys, man But all right guys, I appreciate you guys coming Uh, I will definitely be streaming again In the next day or two not sure yet We'll see if we get a schedule I will be out of town again this weekend though So if I stream again, it'll be sometime this week But all right guys, you guys already know where to hit me up. If you guys have any questions Send me a dm on uh instagram That's someone that I can see the best usually Um bitcoin dot daily Uh Make sure to follow us on youtube I posted my uh the link up in the chat also posted the discord in the chat And let's see let's see how this trade goes man Hopefully we could break that this 12 000 and it's 12.2 And shoot up If we break 12.2, we're definitely hitting 12.5 and I think 13k so I'll keep you guys updated peace out guys