Hello. My name is Harry Bonzell. I'm an American citizen of Austrian descent. I was born in the Midwestern state of Indiana a good many years ago. Seems a long time to me. But I wonder how many of you are like me. I've always felt that I've met my responsibilities as an American citizen rather well. And yet, honest contemplation of the past and the present forces me to confess that there may have been some things that I've overlooked as perhaps of you. It must be quite apparent by this time to any thinking individual that the people of our country and people of other countries all over the world are coming to face a moment of grave decision. A time when we will choose the course of our future. The choice lies between two opposing ideologies on the one side socialist communism vesting total power over the individual within the state. On the other side democratic capitalism advocating a people's government and granting to the individual certain rights and freedoms. Freedom of thought, of speech, freedom of worship, the right of free enterprise, free assembly and many other rights and freedoms. Now it would seem inconceivable to me that any thinking person would voluntarily choose socialist communism in as much as in so doing he divests himself of all individual rights and subjects himself completely to the dictates and the will of whatever individuals may be in control of the state from time to time. To me that's like signing a blank check and handing it to a stranger. Without any right of cancellation should it fall into the wrong hands and yet in just a few short years the proponents of socialist communism have succeeded in bringing under their influence or control nearly 40% of the world's people. How has this been accomplished? It's with the fervent hope that together we might find an answer to that question that I ask you to remain with us here for a little while to look, to listen and to think. You are watching a student riot in Caracas, Venezuela protesting the visit of a vice president of the United States. This mob was incited and led by known communists. Moscow to Montevideo. This communist led student riot in Montevideo, Uruguay is protesting the visit of a president of the United States. Moscow to Tokyo. Americans rioting in Tokyo, inflamed and led by communists protesting the Japanese American Peace Treaty. Moscow to San Francisco. These are American students in San Francisco led by known communists. They are protesting the House Committee on Un-American Activities. This crisis for Americans is vividly highlighted by the communist accent on youth. May I present our program moderator, Mr. William J. Teague, president of Pepperdine College of Los Angeles. Ladies and gentlemen, this series, Crisis for Americans, is dedicated to you and to the freedoms for which our country stands. This is not a propaganda program. What we show you is based upon facts presented by governmental agencies. These facts, closely studied and analyzed, present a clear pattern upon which the masterminds of Soviet socialist communism build their case for dividing and conquering the world. The youthful mind, eager, quickly stimulated and idealistically imaginative is vulnerable to these things. In many cases, the responses are completely emotional rather than intellectual. The result, such demonstrations as we have just witnessed. Let's look further and see how the communist sees every opportunity to achieve their goals. This laying of Patrice Lumumba set off more communist-insided student riots like this in Cairo, Egypt. At a Kremlin reception for supposed non-communist neutral, Premier Nasser Khrushchev stated, quote, we are willing to do everything in order to further the complete liberation of colonial independent countries, unquote. Moscow to Belgrade. In Tito's supposed non-soviet communist neutral, Yugoslavia, this student riot. And Khrushchev said, quote, in this world today there is a fierce struggle of two ideologies, the socialist and the bourgeois. And in this struggle, there can be no neutrals. Moscow to Paris. Here another communist-insided student riot. And Khrushchev declared, quote, we do not want war, but we do not renounce class warfare. Moscow to Cuba. Another proud accomplishment of communism. In Stalin's words, quote, Lenin never regarded the Republic of Soviets as an end in itself. To him it was always a link needed to facilitate the victory of the working people of the world over capitalism. Moscow to New York. The United Nations. This happened. Why? Let us ponder the words of Lenin, one of the founders of communism. Quote, it is possible to conquer the more powerful enemy by skilfully taking advantage of every antagonism between the various groups or types, by taking advantage of every opportunity of gaining a mass ally. Those who do not understand this fail to understand even a grain of Marxism. Youth will decide the issue of the entire struggle, both student youth and still more the working class youth. A further enlightening statement of Lenin's is, quote, in our struggle for world domination, America will fall like a ripe plum without a shot being fired. These are the teachings of Lenin, quote. At the basis of communist morality lies the struggle for the consolidation and consummation of communism. That also is the basis of communist training, education, and tuition.  Because the USSR is the base of the world revolutionary movement, unquote. Here is another quote from Stalin, quote. A revolution which has been victorious in one country must regard itself as a means for hastening the victory of the proletariat in all countries. Khrushchev is doing all he can to bury us and achieve in his time the communist world domination goal. On March 21, 1961, Mr. K told the Soviet people, quote, We shall be happy when the people of all countries stand under the banner of Marxism-Leninism, and the communist banner shall fly over the whole planet, unquote. His militant ally, Chinese communist Mao Tse-tung, is quoted in the official Peking People's Daily as saying that coexistence with capitalism is impossible and that warfare with those forces is inevitable. It would appear that whether hot or cold, the war against our society continues unrelenting. Khrushchev's happiness depends upon the political theory that the present form of government in the United States should be changed by force, violence, and other unconstitutional means to a totalitarian form of government, where we have a dictatorship. This is what Khrushchev advocates for us and our grandchildren. One party government. People ruled by dictators and bureaus and not responsible to the people, controlled by a police state. Wages and prices fixed by the state. Workers told where to work. All means of production owned by the state. The same true of all forms of communication. And worse, the state controls education. Confessions of people accused of crimes obtained by pressure. Let's see how happy the people really are who already live under the banner of Marxism-Leninism. Here you see 50,000 East Berliners led by their youth demonstrating for the right of self-determination. When the communist puppet regime calls for Soviet tanks, the people are enraged. A communist red flag goes up in flames. Russian signs are demolished. Soviet uniforms being tossed to the crowd are torn to shreds. It would seem to belie Mr. K's confident words, quote, the Germans in East Germany do not wish to return to the old way of life, end quote. These insurgents have no arms. They throw stones and use sticks against the Soviet tanks. The crowd unleashes its fury on red sympathizers and fellow travelers among them. East Germans will never forget their one day of freedom, June 17th, 1953. These Germans were fighting for the right to live in a free republic such as ours, where in a republic there is no limit on the number of political parties or candidates for office. Where the people are free to differ from the party in power and vote for other candidates. Where people are governed by officials responsible to the people. And where wages are determined by individual or collective bargaining. And we have the freedom to choose our own jobs. Where the people own the means of production. Where we enjoy free press, free speech, freedom of religion. Where we have local control of education. And where the courts safeguard personal liberties and private property. Many references have been made to the fact that some Americans, especially young people, may be taking their freedoms for granted. To comment on this alleged apathy, we have invited a top expert on communism. Dr. Strauss-Huppey, who is director of Foreign Policy Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania and professor of political science. Professor Huppey? Thank you, Mr. Teague. Of course, students should be encouraged to learn more about national and international affairs. I'm not sure that students as a group are more apathetic about international affairs as are other groups of our population. Perhaps one of the main reasons for their interest not being as consistent as it might be is the lack of clearly stated foreign policy objectives. This does not apply to students alone. It applies to every one of us. If we know upon what to focus, then indeed we can study what we need to study. But in the absence of clearly stated objectives, it is very difficult to see exactly where we should begin. Now, to be sure, students ought to study more. Yet, in order to study, they must have available the necessary materials. There are many good books, many interesting articles which tell us what communist objectives are, what the communists want to achieve in the world, what their strategy and their tactics are. Now, these books, of course, must be available to the students, and they must be made available by the appropriate teachers. This is a very complex process, and I cannot see any shortcuts to remedying the alleged apathy of the American student. To help you get the information, may we suggest your public library as a source of hundreds of books, magazine articles, pamphlets, newspapers, and audio-visual material on communism. Here are just a few. Masters of Deceit by J. Edgar Hoover, an excellent book on anti-communism. The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Scousen, formerly of the FBI. And The New Class by Milovan Jiles, a former official of the Tito regime of Yugoslavia. You can also get these books and materials at independent bookstores, as we did. Now, let's take a look at some material written by top communists. Cuba, Hope of a Hemisphere by Joseph North, publication by international publishers. North is foreign editor of the Communist Party's newspaper, The Worker. Disarmament and the American economy by Hyman Loomer, publication by New Century publishers. Loomer is educational secretary of the Communist Party USA, and Campus Rebels by L. Richmond, executive editor of The People's World, the Communist Party's West Coast publication. In Campus Rebels, Richmond presents the case for the students involved in the San Francisco riots 1960. Pertinent to this student incident are these two U.S. government publications. Report by the Committee on Un-American Activities and Communist Target Youth by J. Edgar Hoover. In this report, Mr. Hoover states, the plans for the format of New Horizons reveal the nature of the trap communists are setting for our campus students. Rubin pointed out to the Party's National Executive Committee that New Horizons will not be labeled a Marxist publication. The purpose of this is to avoid too close identification with the Communist Party, but it will, he said, give a Marxist analysis of the youth movement and a socialist outlook. He expressed the conviction that it would be extremely effective in closing the gap between what he termed democratic youth and youth on the left. Mr. Hoover declares, particularly unfortunate is the fact that many youth and student groups in the nation today are totally unaware of the extent to which the Communist can victimize and exploit them. Communist Target Youth and the 1960 annual report by the Committee on Un-American Activities are two of the many pamphlets you can get from your government printing office. Material from this official list of publications relating to various aspects of communism are for sale at a very nominal cost by the superintendent of documents U.S. government printing office, Washington 25 D.C. Typical of other booklets is guide to subversive organizations and publication.  For another aspect of the Communist Accent on Youth, Jed Hoover in his Communist Target Youth says, The communist lures to subvert youth of other countries are tempting and varied. There are, for instance, the World Youth Festivals which have been held every other year since 1947. The seventh such affair held in Vienna, 1959, attracted thousands of young people from America, Africa and Asia, as well as those from the Soviet satellite countries. Referring to communist youth, Hoover goes on to say, quote, from their earliest days, these young people must learn to accept the course dictated for them by the almighty state, unquote. Khrushchev bears this out in a speech at the 40th anniversary of the young Communist League, quoting Khrushchev. Young people often wonder what a person in communist society should be like. This can be answered briefly. He should be a true Leninist. One is born in a socialist society and one lives first of all for the community. Therefore, private affairs, thoughts and deeds must be subordinated. In this communist sponsored rally, youth is gathered from all over the globe. In contrast to the rigid control the Russians exercise over their students and youth, ours enjoy liberty and freedom of thought, freedom of choice and freedom of self-determination. What do our students really know about the basic freedoms and opportunities of the American way of life? For a shocking report on how we look to our enemy. Here is Dr. William E. Mayer, major in the United States Army, foremost authority on communist brainwashing and a top psychiatrist. I'm going to read excerpts of a report which is an evaluation of the nature of the average American soldier, as seen by the chief of intelligence of the Chinese People's Volunteer Army in North Korea several years ago. I quote, based upon our observations of American soldiers and their officers, captured in this war for the liberation of Korea from capitalist imperialist aggression, the following facts are evident. There is little knowledge or understanding, even among U.S. university graduates, of American political history or philosophy, the federal, state and community organization, states and civil rights, freedoms, safeguards, checks and balances, and how these things allegedly operate within his own system. The American is insular and provincial, with little or no idea of the problems and the aims of what he contemptuously describes as foreigners and their countries. The American soldier has weak loyalties to his family, his community, his country, his religion, and to his fellow soldier. His concepts of right and wrong are hazy and ill-formed. Opportunism is easy for him. By himself, he feels frightened and insecure. He underestimates his own worth, his own strength, and his ability to survive.  That's the end of the quotation. There are several important things that should be remembered about this document. To begin with, it was written by communists. It reflects their point of view. It was not written as propaganda, but as a guide for those people who were going to operate prisoner-of-war camps in North Korea. The studies were of soldiers under the worst possible conditions of malnutrition and danger. Now, we have studied in the armed forces ever since that time the nature of the American soldier and ways to improve his quality. And we've come a long way. Recent research in the past year has indicated that the average American fighting man is today more concerned with his duties and responsibilities, both as a soldier and as a citizen, and is better informed about communism than ever before. However, the document still has a certain amount of meaning and importance for Americans. It can serve as a kind of checklist that we can use ourselves. By seeing what it is the communists feel are our greatest vulnerabilities, the big chinks and cracks in our moral armor. We can determine our attempt to whether our family structure today, whether our school system, our churches, the activities of our communities are actually building in to young Americans long before they reach military age. Our building in those attributes of a sense of deep personal responsibility, not leaving things to somebody else or to the government to take care of for them. Whether our society is building in to our youngsters, a genuine deep understanding of the philosophical basis for this society of free men, the moral basis upon which our country is founded and upon which the preservation of a society such as ours depends. Here is how the freedom and prosperity we enjoy came about. Private property, a natural human right. Private property in the United States guaranteed by the Constitution and laws. Private ownership of land and the means of production. The right to pay interest and dividends for the use of money in order to conduct a business. The right to sell legal stocks and bonds to finance business. People free to organize and conduct any legal business for profit. Our system stimulates initiative, industry, creativity and independence. And it develops the natural resources of the nation and ensures large production of goods and services and employment to many people. In the face of what we have to offer, how do communists gain control of non-communist governments? Let's take a look. By military occupation. By expelling non-communist officials. By the army appointing puppet officials. By obtaining military and police powers. Controlling the legislative procedures. By propaganda creating political and economic unrest. Controlling the courts. Terrorizing political and economic opponents. By obtaining government positions and secrets. Khrushchev uttered these words. We respect all peoples and are in favor of each settling for itself, which order is better for it. This is Budapest, Hungary, October 1956. University students are demonstrating their approval of Poland's successful defiance of the Soviet Union. Their ranks quickly swell with public support. They assemble in the tens of thousands to hear members of their Writers' Union oppose the Communist Party government leaders for oppressing freedom, distorting the truth, exploiting labor and abusing the farmers. The students demand an end to Soviet domination. They want their own flag without the Soviet emblem in it. The symbol of alien rule. Khrushchev had this to say, quote, the lesson of the events in Hungary where the counter-revolution used some writers for its filthy ends, reminds us of what political carelessness can lead to in relation to the intrigues of the forces hostile to socialism, unquote. The students post their own program of 16 points, including a demand for a new government to resist Soviet oppression. They march to the Budapest radio station to make their program known to the nation and to the world. Their delegates are arrested. The angry crowd refuses to disperse until their student leaders are free and defy the Communist security police open fire with machine guns, not water hoses. Freedom fighters rally to fight the Soviet tanks moving in during the night. Khrushchev said, we had force in our hands and the truth was on our side. Our truth is the truth of the workers. We were faced with the question, what to do? Reason urged that we helped the workers in the working class of the Hungarian People's Republic. Comrades believed me that it was difficult for us to make a decision. But we considered that we could not remain in different spectators when emboldened fascist elements embarked on bestial outrages against workers, peasants, communists and others of the best representatives of the working class of Hungary, unquote. Translation, Russians go home. These are Molotov cocktails, a homemade concoction of Russian recipe. They prove most effective against the Soviet tanks. The Russian drive bogs down. The Soviets are forced to lift the siege of the Kilian barracks for a hastily organized defense under Colonel Powell Molotow as withstood of violent assault. The inscription reads, free Hungarian radio. A free press rolls. Cardinal Minzenti, imprisoned for eight years, sees the light of a great day. We quote Khrushchev. You think that the communist system in this or that country can be maintained only with the help of our armed forces? I would not fight for such a communist system. The communist system must be based on the will of the people. And if the people do not wish this system, let them establish the way of life they prefer best, unquote. The Soviets start to evacuate themselves from the city and go to great lengths to convince the Hungarian populists that they're getting out for good. Hungarians make a holiday out of seeing the families of Soviet officials leaving the city bag and baggage. Hungarian army soldiers and freedom fighters rejoice in their victory. Here is Yanis Savov, one of the citizen heroes to emerge from the revolution. Minister of State of the new government, Kildi, and Molotow, now a major general, are invited to the headquarters of the Soviet high command to discuss the withdrawal of the Soviet troops. It's a trap. Molotow is never to return. And the Hungarian army and Budapest is left without a commander. Now Soviet bombers signal the beginning of a crushing tank assault on the city backed by big guns. Khrushchev explained, quote, we are convinced that the Hungarian working class will never give the counter-revolution an opportunity to raise its head. We must warn amateurs against all kinds of provocations. The Soviet Union is always ready to come to the aid of its friends and resist the enemies of socialism. It is well known that in their attempts to undermine the foundations of the people's democratic system, the enemies of socialism were relying on the young people, trying to deceive them with false slogans and to deflect them from the correct path. In connection with this, we must constantly increase our vigilance and pay more attention to the correct upbringing of young people. Three months following tributes paid him as a hero of the revolution, patriot Janos Savos was hanged. From its inception, communism has sought to be guile, to deceive, to ensnare, and to employ others to unwittingly serve its goal of worldwide domination. The idealism of youth has been misused to bring about social upheaval and political chaos. Communism is not interested in healing any breach or resolving any system. Rather, it agitates, foments, and exploits human problems. Of course, in America, we have the freedom to dissent and to criticize existing policies so long as we follow legal processes.  We must not carelessly use this freedom. Thus weakening or destroying the system that makes it possible. The most powerful evidence of the unparalleled advantages and values of our American system is the freedom it allows its own critics. Let's keep it. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Our purpose, I believe, is quite clear. It is to seek a greater awareness among us of the true nature and the true goals of those forces we oppose, to clarify and to reveal the methods by which they would hope to further those goals. As I said at the beginning of this subject, I believe the time of choice is imminent. No one can deny you the right to choose that which you want for yourself, for your children and for your grandchildren. We ask only that you inform yourself as completely as possible so that if and when you make your decision, you do so with the full realization of what it portends. Thank you.


Live from Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE. Covering Red Hat Summit 2019, brought to you by Red Hat. Well good afternoon, wherever you might be watching us here on theCUBE, we are live in Boston as we wrap up our coverage headed toward the home stretch you might say of Red Hat Summit 2019. I'm Juan with Stu Miniman, I'm John Walls and thank you for joining us here. We're now joined by Alois Wrightbauer, who is the vice president and chief technical strategist and head of innovation lab at Dynatrace. And Alois, good to see you today. Thanks for being with us. Hello, thanks for having me. So software intelligence, that's your primary focus. You've got headquarters here in the Boston area, back in Austria. Tell a little bit about it, you would, Dynatrace and I guess first off, what this news this week has meant to you in terms of the releases and then maybe what you're doing in general. You know, what Dynatrace is all about? Yeah, so Dynatrace has been around for like quite a time. Started out as an APM company like 14 years ago. Have been reinventing ourselves over and over again. And so we moved from the traditional monitoring approach. So the innovation we had in the very beginning when we launched the first product was really what we back then called PurePass. So the ability to trace end to end. Now we hear a lot about tracing, like becoming super cool for microservices. So it would be like the first T-shirt we could be wearing, doing tracing before it was cool, like 14, 15 years ago. And then obviously we're evolving the product more and more, scaling it to bigger and bigger environments. So what does bigger and bigger mean? I remember in the beginning, when we were working on environments we were talking about like 100 hosts, that's a big environment. I was like, okay, 500 hosts, that's a big environment. Today we say for even 100,000 hosts, okay, it's a big environment but they can't get even bigger. Then the massive change was really for us five years ago where we implemented our entire product offering, built the new Dynatrace with the focus that we realized that okay, it's data and showing people data and having them analyze data is nice. But it's only getting you so far. So the more complex your replication, the more data you get to analyze. And it's just more as exponentially scaling how many people you would need to deal with this. And that's why five years ago we started to incorporate AI into our new core platform then for automatic problem analysis. That's also why we said we're not just APM, that's just what we call like the DOG tools, data on glass tools. They show you a lot of data. Do some analysis on top of it, but it don't help you to really resolve a problem. So we used built-in AI engine that automatic root cause analysis. Again, the next teacher doing AI ops before it was cool, like five years ago. And in the latest evolution, we also saw again another change in the way people are using monitoring tools. We've invested a lot into building out an API. So we don't see monitoring tools like being the monitoring tool here and the application over there, but having the monitoring tool being tightly integrated into the fabric via APIs. So we have as of today 80% of our customers are using their product also via APIs by tying them into operational automation. What we heard even today in the keynote here about AI ops and how AI ops starts to control and manage a platform, more or less becoming the intelligence or the backplane behind a modern cloud native stack. So we had Chris Wright who was in the keynote this morning came on our program this morning too, and we talked about just the rippling effects of distributed architectures. By looking at my applications, they're going to micro-services architectures. Where's customers data? Well, lots of stuff all over the clouds and SaaS, and that has a ripple effect to your space.  It becomes a whole separate meeting. So, Dynatris has been going through a transformation. Give us a point check as to where your customers are, how you're helping them move through this modernization and move to distributed architectures and where that fits in. So, the customers we focus on mostly are like Fortune 500 customers we work with and obviously they have everything that exists on the planet when we talk about software, like even from the mainframe to cloud native to serverless as you mentioned here. And they were in this transition process right now like modernizing their applications, which as a necessity, we all want to move faster. We want to have more flexible architectures. We want to build more innovative products. But at the same time, they realize that there's also a massive business risk behind following this approach. Think about you in the role of a CAO and say, well, we're going to modernize our architecture. We're going to rebuild everything, re-platform and so forth. If you succeed, everybody would say, yes, you did what you had to do. I mean, sorry. If you fail, you failed. So for them, it's a big risk to move down that route and be tired to take that risk out of this process as much as possible. Really starting obviously with monitoring their traditional stacks as they have them today, but really supporting them along that entire journey to a cloud native architecture, starting with what we refer to as our support for monoliths to microservice architectures. So the idea is basically, you don't want to rip apart your application and figure out how it's going to work in a microservices world, but we have this technology that's called SmartScape. SmartScape monoliths builds a real-time model of your entire data center and all the applications running into it. And then it can most virtually dissect your monoliths, see, okay, how would they look like in a microservices architecture without touching any code and then making it work? So once you've done this, once you've decided to move there, the next step obviously is you kind of rebuild that application. Usually we see applications with microservices architectures being significantly more complex or more distributed by design than a traditional app. You might have web server application here, database server. Now you might be talking about maybe 200 microservices or more. So like the 20 times range is rather on the lower bound here, which means that your traditional operational approach of okay, it's either the database, the web server, the application server doesn't work anymore. On top of this, you did all of this to deploy fast, like go for like bi-weekly releases, even maybe daily or like a smaller granularity. So you're adding a lot of entropy to that system. And you have to analyze way more data than you ever had to do before. And this is where we kind of getting to that level where theoretically humans could do it, but it would just take us too long where the whole AIOPS capability come in and where we let the machines let a monitoring tool take care of it at that level. At that level, so we're helping them to operationalize these processes and then really supporting them along that whole journey where every customer who we talk to has like this vision what we also heard today in the keynote of an autonomous cloud. And with Kubernetes, we all want to make a great step in this direction, looking at the infrastructure layer like today, say I need five replicas of this container. I don't know how Kubernetes does it or OpenShift and specifically here, it's going to happen. But if we move to the application layer, there's a lot that has to be done and it has to make it easier for people to do. And that's where we tie into the entire customer's ecosystem to automate like their cloud environment and have actually build the practice around which we call autonomous cloud management that we have been working with customers on to enable them to achieve this over time. Obviously it's going to be a long journey there. Yeah, so I mean, so you talked about that, ACO, autonomous cloud management, what exactly is that? And how are you bringing that to your customer base? Autonomous cloud management resulted out of two different areas. The first one was when we were re-implementing our platform, what I mentioned before, one step for us was to move to the SaaS platform. And we looked at all the operational practices that were around back then. We didn't know we don't want to build a knock. We really don't want to do it. Like having people 24 seven look at dashboards, then going to a Wiki, then reading a description of how to fix a problem. If you're an engineer, why do we do this this way? It doesn't make any sense. So we developed our own practice which we referred to as no-ups. Well, no-ups doesn't mean that you're not doing operations. That would be pretty crazy, but not doing this traditional knock type of operation sitting there staring at a screen 24 seven and then manually executing any operation. So we had our own practice that we built around it. And quite frankly, we just built it because we needed it for ourselves. And then we kept talking to customers and part of it. Hey, so it's really cool what you did there. Like, oh, how did you do this? What's like your software stack behind this? And what are the practices? What are your processes? What's the culture change? So we were engaging with some customers and then we were seeing that some of our customers back then even were doing bits and pieces of this as well. And we thought, okay, there's a lot of practice and a lot of knowledge around how to do autonomous cloud management. And at the same time that we talked like the other customers who are not yet on a journey who definitely want to get there, but are not quite sure how to do it and they don't want to figure it out themselves. So we thought, okay, let's take all of these best practices that we have and build more or less a methodology around it. How to make this actually work, like how to do this. We really broke it down into like individual sprints. The distance sprint one, the distance sprint two to really have the results within three months, six months, 12 months, whatever the pace is that you want to run on.  So that's why we started to open up this to an entire ecosystem. So we brought ecosystem partners along, like working closely with red, a lot of other companies, but also system integrators who can help us with bigger projects because we as a company are a software company. So we're not a services or consulting company. We do support customers in some of those engagement, but if you think of like a really fortune 500 company, that's a multi-year project that will keep hundreds of people busy. So to recap, like build the methodology, we built the ecosystem to deliver on that promise at scale. And now the last step was we, as we were doing this, we also built like a reference architecture for it. And it was just an internal idea. So how do we like structure this, build that reference architecture and then realize, okay, it's actually kind of like super helpful for customers. So that's why we then decided to open source this reference architecture, this fabric as well, to like the entire software community so that they can also use it. So technically it's really these three pieces. It's the methodology, it's the ecosystem, and it's like the reference architecture that you can work with to help you achieve that goal. All right, tell us how your AI fits into this. I've heard some analyst firms are saying, some of the next generation of your space could be AI ops. Do you consider yourselves moving in that direction or do you have some counter-view on that? I think today a lot of things are AI ops that might not be AI ops and it's still a very undefined goal. And as I mentioned earlier, we decided to have AI based algorithms as part of our platform five years ago and nobody back then was talking about AI ops. Funny story, some of our competitors even told us you can't use AI for monitoring, just like I told you, but then they bought other companies that they were doing it. But again, so the whole industry is learning here. I think it's really about data analysis. If you look at, if you scale the bigger and bigger environment, you really have to look at the process of what the human operations people are doing. And there's obviously some hard decisions that you have to take. You have to work with teams to resolve hard problems. But the biggest portion is really data analysis and interpretation, right? And a lot of this can be put into an AI component that does it and what the Dynatrace AI does. It more or less is like your SRE in code, so to speak, which is able to find what's broken in the application, what was related to an issue in the application and being able to automatically find the root cause. Very importantly, we are kind of like opinionated on how an AI for operational practices should be working. Because one thing you don't want to do is you don't want to have an AI op system tell you, well, we should restart this service because some neural network told you to do so. That's not building a lot of confidence. That's why our approach is really to follow like what we call a deterministic API, sorry, an AI that is able to explain back to the user why it came to a certain conclusion. So why should I restart this service? Why should I roll back this deployment? Or why does the AI believe that if I fix this problem, then like the bigger problem will be solved. So that's our approach to AI ops. We started roughly five years ago, even a bit more than that money. And I think I have a lot of experience really rolling it out at scale and seeing it really helped people because the ultimate next question we didn't always got was if you already know what the problem is, why don't you fix it? And that's exactly the conversation you want to have. Maybe just to briefly add here because it usually comes up, okay, you have AI and is it replacing people's jobs? I don't think so. We also heard it in the keynote today from Chris. It's augmenting our capabilities. There's hard decisions that you have to take but just going through tons and tons of data is not going to result. Very often when we talk to the operations team or almost every time, first of all, you can't hire enough people anyways to get all done that's on your plate. Secondly, just by the amount of data and the time to react, it's just longer with the human and standard scenario. We do this demo on self-healing of an application where we deploy something broken into production and have it being rolled back and we can do it in 51 seconds. No human can do it that fast. That's just what pure software automation can do for you. I think that then you can focus on other areas that are more important, new projects. I always ask people in the off-space, what are the three projects that you want to work on and you never have time to work on? And usually they come up with the list and say, yeah, this is what, we give you back that time to work on exactly those things that move your business forward. You said 51 seconds. You've never seen Stu in action. Stu, I have a lot of confidence in you. Well, we love the machine-enhanced human intelligence. Which definitely we could all use some machines to help us all get away from the drudgery and be able to do more. I'll always say, safe travels. Thanks for being with us. Headed back to Austria. Let's say hi to all your folks back in Austria real quick. Hi there. I'll always say, on his way home, on his way to the airport, but thank you for being with us here on theCUBE. I appreciate the time. Our coverage continues here, Red Hat Summit 2019. You're watching theCUBE.


وأقولوا في القرآن ما جاءت به آياته فهو الكاريم المنزال وأقولوا قال الله جل جلاله والمصطف الهدي ولا أتأواله الحمد لله رب العالمين له الحمد الحسن والثناء الجميل وشدوا الله إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له وأشدوا أن سيدنا ونبينا ومحمد صلى الله عليه وعليه وعلى آله وأصحابه والتابعين لهم بحسان إلى يوم الدين أما بعد إن شاء الله تعالى وإن شرح أفدي كتاب أخلاقه حملت القرآن ويتن باي الإمام أبو بكر محمد بن الحسين الأجري رحمه الله بأوث رحمه الله هسد باب فضل حملت القرآن هسد حدثنا أبو العباس حامد بن محمد بن الشعيب البلخي قال حدثنا يعقوب الدورقي قال حدثنا عبد الرحمن بن مهدي عن عبد الرحمن بن بديل عن أبيه عن أنس بن مالك رضي الله تعالى عنه قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لله بن الناس أهلون قيل منهم يا رسول الله قال أهل القرآن هم أهل الله وخاصته بأوث رحمه الله في هذا الشابطة سوف يتحدث about the virtue of the ones who are carrying the Qur'an باب فضل حملت القرآن The word فضل in the Arabic language is a singular The word فضل is a singular And the plural of the word فضل is فضائل فضائل فضائل is a plural of the word فضل Now when we were reading the word when we were reading the chapter we say باب فضل حملت القرآن So when we translate it in English we say chapter the virtues we make it plural even that the word فضل is a singular How do we reconcile between that? Because the author is going to mention the virtues he's not just going to mention one virtue for the people who are carrying the Qur'an or the carriers of the Qur'an In the Arabic language is a قاعدة There is a principle in the Arabic language And it's also a principle stated and mentioned by the scholars of قواعد الفقية وصول الفقا وما إلا ذلك They mention this Which is that if a singular is ascribed to something A singular Arabic word If it's مضاق meaning it's ascribed to something It shows room that is general المفرد إذا أضيفة If the مفرد is ascribed It benefits that it's general It shows the meaning of فضائل as though you say virtues So the word فضل now becomes فضائل virtues الله يشهد an example like that in the Qur'an الله يقول سبحانه وتعالى وإن تعودوا نعمة الله If you count the blessings We make it general look at that We say if you were in تعودوا نعمة الله If you count the blessings of Allah But here Allah mentioned نعمة And نعمة is a singular word And the plural of the word نعمة is نعم But the قاعدة is المفرد The مفرد word إذا أضيفة يفيد العموم و لذلك عبد الرحمن ناصر السعدي And he says in his كتاب القوائد الفقية كذا كمن وما تفيدان مع كل العموم يا أخي فاسمع أنه goes on to say ومثله المفرد يضافه ففهم هديت الرشتة ما يضافه So the مفرد If it's مضاف يفيد العموم ففهم هديت الرشتة ما يضافه So we say بابو the chapter فضل فضل sorry حملتي القرآن The chapter that speaks about the virtues of the people are carrying the Qur'an Another point that we want to look at when it comes to the chapter is that The author رحم الله used the word حملتي القرآن The carriers of the Qur'an He used the word carriers of the Qur'an The question here is What does it mean carriers of the Qur'an حملتي القرآن حملة The one who's carrying حمل The one who's carrying the Qur'an What does it actually mean The one who carries the Qur'an means The one who's carrying its wordings And he's got the wordings of the Qur'an in his chest And the Qur'an brothers and sisters It originates or is originally placed in the hearts The Qur'an where it should be normally is in the hearts The Qur'an Shouldn't have to be in books or in papers And the people have to memorize the Qur'an الله mentions in the Qur'an بل هو آيات بينات في صدور الذين أوتوا العلم That the Qur'an It's in the hearts and the chest of the people of knowledge And when the Qur'an first came down It didn't come down written It came down to the heart of the Prophet That's what Allah سبحانه وتعالى He says وإنه لتنزيل رب العالمين نزل به الروح الأمين على قلن بك لتكون من المنذرين بلسان عربين مبين So Allah mentions that the Qur'an Was placed in the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم's heart And in his chest And even when the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم tried to recite the Qur'an with Jibril And he was trying to quickly memorize الله تباركه تعالى told the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم لا تحرك به لسانك لتعجل به إنه علينا جماعه وقرآن What does it mean إنه علينا جماعه وقرآن And to leave it to us محمد We are the ones that are going to place The Qur'an in your chest We're going to place it in your heart We're going to make sure you memorize it So don't be Don't hasten We're going to make sure That the Qur'an is in your heart So the word حملة القرآن Means definitely the one who memorizes The wording of the Qur'an يعني He is good in his You know Memorization of the wordings But it has another Meaning The word حملة القرآن Which is the one Who also understands And implements the Qur'an Which is another two extra things حملة القرآن Means a person who's Carrying the meaning And is also carrying The implementation يعني He is implementing these wordings And this is very vital and important Three things is what it means حملة القرآن It means The person has التلاوة الصحيحة And everyone has to write this down It's very important And it's a very important point The word حملة القرآن It encompasses It actually means three things التلاوة الصحيحة And the word حملة القرآن And the word حملة القرآن And the word حملة القرآن The second thing is That the person has حسن التطبيق The application Of the Qur'an Is correct Meaning the person Implements the Qur'an Correctly into their life Correctly This is the best You've perfected its implementation in your life يعني You're doing a good job In implementing the Qur'an In taking on the Awamid The commandments Which are in the Qur'an The prohibitions that are in the Qur'an That is the second one is The second part is حسن التطبيق حسن التطبيق means Perfecting the application of the Qur'an The third one is الفهم الصحيح The person has a correct understanding of the Qur'an The person has The correct understanding Of the Qur'an And that the person isn't Understanding the Qur'an To be What it isn't That's what the author means by When he says حملت القرآن Now the evidence to show That just memorizing the wordings Doesn't mean that you're a carrier of the Qur'an And that's the sad reality That we're living in today We're actually seeing people Who do not know what they have memorized And they don't know the Qur'an They haven't understood the Qur'an They don't know what Allah is commanding them here And they don't know what Allah is prohibiting them here They haven't understood it Nor are they even implementing the Qur'an in their lives And then we call these people The carriers of the Qur'an And that's a mistake Because look at this Allah mentions That the Jews The Jews Who had known the Torah Who were carrying the Torah Allah SWT Mentioned That they weren't really carrying the Torah Because they weren't implementing it in their lives Allah says متلولة دين حملوا التوراتة ثم لم يحملوها ثم لم يحملوها They didn't carry it The author is using the same word They knew the Torah They understood the Torah They knew the Torah inside out But the Jews did not implement it And that's what Allah SWT Said they were not the carriers of the Torah The Torah was given to them But they didn't carry it in their lives And that's what Allah SWT He stripped from them the word ثم لم يحملوها They didn't implement it و لذلك الله سبحانه وتعالى He doesn't attribute a person to the Qur'an If he's not a person who's If the person is not carrying The implementation As much as the wordings with him And you're not from the people of the Qur'an If you're not carrying the wordings And the meaning together And the implementation You're not from the people of the Qur'an And Allah SWT Showed us a very powerful point In the Qur'an نبي الله النوح had a son And the son of the Prophet As we all know wasn't a believer When the rain descended And came from the sky And الله تعالى was going to destroy the creation نوح informed his son And he said to his son Look You're going to get destroyed here Come with me And you'll be saved And he said to his father سعاوي إلى رك... He said He said to his father in response سعاوي إلى جبال يعصيموني من الماء He said My father I'm going to go to a mountain That will protect me from this rain Don't worry Don't worry about me I've got it under control And then نبي اللهي نوح Spoke to his son And he said to him This is not going to save you today This is not going to protect you today The only people are going to be saved Are the people who are with me Let's talk to his son This is the dialogue that happens between them And then what happens As they are talking to each other A tide of water comes in between them And he destroys his son And نوح saw that He became emotional from that So نوح went to his lord الله سبحانه وتعالى And conversed with his lord الله عز وجل He spoke to him And نبي اللهي نوح Said to الله تبارك وتعالى Oh, that was my son He's my son He's my offspring And I saw him die today And he's a father He kills the pain And then الله تبارك وتعالى Said something very powerful to his نبي اللهي نوح Which is الله said to him إنه ليس من أهلك This child He's not from your family إنه عمل غير صالح And another reading It says Another reading It says إنه عمل غير صالح This child He's not your family Who underlines I want you to all Ponder and contemplate on this point He is not from your family Why? Because his actions Were not good Later when we come to the Hadith إن شاء الله وتعالى Where we see that إنه لله أهلين Allah has a people Allah has a أهل A people on this earth The people of Allah أهو The ones who implement the Qur'an Right Action نوح I want you to see the comparison here نوح His son is not from his family His father's family Because his actions were different To his father's actions And if someone is not in line with the Qur'an He's not from the people of the Qur'an The same way نوح His son Is not from his father's family Because his actions were not in accordance To his father's actions Does that make sense? But it's very important So The People who are carrying the Qur'an Are the ones who have memorized it The ones who Implemented it The ones who understood it Those are the carriers of the Qur'an If today someone was to memorize For example The قوله تعالى So to make the matter very clear to all of you guys Someone memorized the ayah وما أمروا إلا لعبد الله مخلصين له الدينة حنفاء ويقيم الصلاة ويقيم الزفاة ودالي فديل القيمة And the ayah says وما أمروا إلا لعبد الله مخلصين له الدينة Allah says We did not command them anything except to wash me alone So someone memorized that verse He learned it with all of the recitations He learned it to read He learned the تطبيق And the application of this verse And how to articulate And to say And his voice is so beautiful And he knows the ونة And the med And everything But then he goes And he calls on to other than Allah يعني he goes And he begs the people in the graves He calls on to dead people He calls on to the creation And he doesn't call on to the Creator Will you say This person is The people of the Qur'an Or would you say That that person has come with that verse Is that what you're going to say No, you're not He's not implementing the verse He only knows He only knows the wordings And he doesn't know what He doesn't know the meaning He doesn't know Or he doesn't implement what it says This person is not from the people of the From the Qur'an He's not considered to be The carries of the Qur'an So the chapter here is talking about A people have come with three things They've come with the wording of the Qur'an They know it very well They've implemented it in their life And they're acting according to the Qur'an And the third one is They are People who've understood its meaning They're comprehension of the Qur'an is Is good The author of the رحمة الله He brings a hadith That Anas ibn Malikin Narrated from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم That the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم He said لله من الناس أهلون الله سبحانه وتعالى He has A people on this earth Good So there's people There are people who are called أهلون الله وخاصة There are people Who are called People of Allah سبحانه وتعالى When the Prophet said لله من الناس أهلون There are people The people of Allah They are on this earth A people who are known as أهلون الله The people of Allah Anas ibn Malikin said The Prophet was then asked قيرا منهم يا رسول الله Who are they So how does one know who these people are Because they want to come with these characteristics of being from the people of Allah The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم He said أهلون القرآن The people of the Qur'an Are what هم أهلون الله وخاصة The people of the Qur'an are what The people of the Qur'an Are the people of Allah سبحانه وتعالى أهلون القرآن Are they considered what أهلون الله A person cannot be called أهل of someone If the action of those people Is not in line with what the text is saying You are not considered to be From the people of the Qur'an If you are not implementing What is in the Qur'an Okay brothers and sisters We have taken an example of نبي الله نوح When نوح said قال يا نوح إنه ليس إنه ليس من أهل إنه عملون غيروا صالح ويتوكتات جن ألمام الأجل ريو برينز أسكند حديث يقول أخبرنا أبو بكر عبد الله بن محمد بن عبد الحميد الواسطيو I want to mention a benefit A grammatical benefit يعني فائدة نحوية A grammatical benefit فائدة نحوية Which is الواسطيو الواسطيو الواسطيو الواسطيو We read it with a grammar right It's مرفوح We say الواسطيو Why do we say الواسطيو Because الواسطيو Is a sifa too Is a sifa For what For أبو بكر Okay For أبو بكر But the question here is How could you say الواسطيو is a sifa And the grammarians they condition For a word to be considered as a sifa A sifa is an adjective For a word to be considered an adjective According to grammarians It either has to be مشتق It either has to be rooted from a word Or it has to be المؤول من مشتق Or it has to be a مزدر But two are the main As Ibn Hisham says Is it مشتق or مؤول Those two And the name الواسطيو It's not مشتق It's not مؤول And it's not a مزدر It's jammed It's a solid word not rooted from any word What do we do in a situation like that How could you say it's a sifa now It's lacking one of the condition Of allowing it to be a sifa مع ذلك you're still saying it's a sifa This is الواسطيو is a It's a نسبة It's a نسبة يعني you're attributing this person to somewhere الواسط You're attributing them to that place And the grammarians they believe That the نسبة يقوم مقام المشتق It stands in the position of the مشتق It stands in the position It stands in the position Of a word derived From a root word He says وشبه كدا وذي ولمتسب The word Is a نسبة Okay It stands in the place of a مشتق ابنو حاجب Who's another great scholar Of Grammar and he's the scholar In which ابنو مالك Summarized His Kitab خلاصة is originally from الفتر مالك that we have today Okay Is a summary from the work of ابنو حاجب Originally It's originally from what ابنو حاجب ابنو مالك originally took it from there So That's why we say الواسطيو So it's a grammatical benefit Some of you guys on your copy You're going to see the word ستانا When you see these words تانا It's حدثانا You don't read it as تانا You read it as حدثانا because Back in those days Papers were very expensive And they had to summarize words So instead of saying They'll cut it down to تانا Instead of saying They will say نا And the price For paper is very expensive For us it's all over the place now So what we have to say is And plus the word قاله It's not in there so we have to bring the word قاله So we say قاله he said حدثانا زياد ابنو أيوب قاله again we have to bring that حدثانا أبو عبيدة الحدادي يقال حدثانا عبد الرحمن ابنو بديل عن أبيه عن أنس ابنو مالك رضي الله تعالى عنه إنه لله إهلينا now if you look at the Previous حديث of the chapter And this one there's a slight difference The previous one was what لله من الناس إهلون The previous حديث was what لله من الناس إهلون And this one is what إنه لله إهلينا Where did this difference come from? Who mentioned this difference? Who mentioned this difference? The difference here And some of the scholars they call this ملطقة السند the place where the chain meets The previous one عبد الرحمن ابنو مهدي was the one who narrated from who عبد الرحمن ابنو بديل And here أبو عبيدة الحداد is the one who narrated from عبد الرحمن ابنو بديل And the two people narrated from The previous one was أبو عبيدة الحداد This one is أبو عبيدة الحداد Both of whom are the students of who عبد الرحمن ابنو بديل So the difference here is عبد الرحمن مهدي is narrating لله من الناس إهلون And أبو عبيدة الحداد is narrating with the إنا Which then forces the world to become إن لله إهلينا الله سبحانه وتعالى has a people The Prophet was asked Who are these people The Prophet said أهل القرآن هم أهل الله وخاصته They are the people الله سبحانه وتعالى The people of the Qur'an are the people of Allah They are the people of who الله This hadith ألمامه أحمد ألمامه أدوريه And also ألمامه أحمد بن حنبل And narrated this way In his Muslim And He graded this hadith To be صحيح There is another hadith that explains This hadith And clarifies a very important point That I kept elaborating on And I kept repeating He said يؤتى بالقرآن يوم القيامة And the Qur'an will be brought The dergent و أهله الذين And its people Which ones? Those who used to implement it تقدمه صورة البقرة و آل عمران And صورة آل عمران And صورة البقرة This hadith I went from it is الذين كانوا يعملون به The hadith mentioned The people of the Qur'an are going to come الذين كانوا يعملون به Those who used to implement it So when the Prophet ﷺ He is saying That أهل القرآن أهل الله و خاصته That the people of the Qur'an Are the people of Allah And ألمام الشاطبي Is saying his فما ظنكم بالنجل عند جزائي أولئك أهل الله و الصفة الملاء That these are the people of Allah They are referring to The people who have Memorized its wording And implemented The Qur'an Those are the ones ابن القيم he is saying He says ابن القيم says Because of that The Qur'an They are the ones who have knowledge Of it And they know the Qur'an And they know two things of the Qur'an They know the wording of the Qur'an And they also know the meaning of the Qur'an The second thing is و العاملون بما فيه And they also implement what is in the Qur'an و إل لم يحفظوه عن ظهر القلب ابن القيم Even if they didn't memorize it from memory يعني When we say they know the wording It doesn't necessarily mean they memorized it ها If they can read it from the Mus'haf properly And they are implementing it ابن القيم says They are the people of the Qur'an و أما من حفظه و لم يفهمه But what about a person who memorized the Qur'an He doesn't need a Mus'haf ها But he doesn't understand what he memorized و لم يعمل And he doesn't implement بما فيه فليس من أهله He's not from the people of the Qur'an و إن أقام حروفه إقام تسهمي Even if he's accurate In the pronunciation of those words Like the arrow It's accuracy, it's sharp Each word is hitting the points In his recitations He's not from the people of the Qur'an ابن القيم is saying Two people And he doesn't understand it And doesn't implement it He's not from the people of the Qur'an And he's not from the people of Allah Another person He doesn't know the Qur'an In terms of memorization When he reads it from the Mus'haf It's very good His recitation of the Qur'an is good He understands what he's reading And he Implements it in his life He's from the people of Allah He's from the people of the Qur'an ابن القيم is saying In this episode Insha'Allah I'm going to stop there Anything which I have said that was wrong or incorrect Is from me and Shaytan and Allah has messaged me I'm free from it السلام عليكم If you're enjoying these videos And you'd like to keep up to date with all the courses we're going to be running Make sure you head over to amauathome.com


Hello my YouTube family, I really can't wait to get into this one talking about how when the narcissist realizes that you were their best opportunity, yes of all people that they were involved with you were the one you were their right choice all along from all of their sources of supply it was you you were the one that they were meant to be with if they could just act right because we've only got to look back at all of the things they did to you just remember how they treated you all of those hurtful things they said they manipulated you they abused you they did all of these horrible things to you and it's like they didn't even care they didn't care about what you were going through they didn't care about how it made you feel yes they did that to you and they showed no remorse they showed no desire to make it right to make things better for you after everything that they did but you know what despite all of those things they did to you and I'm not saying that you were perfect you're not this perfect angelic character this saint I mean of course we've all done things wrong in our lives and I know myself I'm not perfect I've made mistakes but despite that we were the best opportunity for them we were the right choice all along and they couldn't even see it they couldn't even see that and why were we the right choice because when they had a problem when they had a difficulty a calamity that they were going through we were the ones who were there we were the ones who were by their side we were the ones who cared and a lot of people did not care we're not there for them but we were we were always there we were always there to listen to their problems that our long monologues about nothing no one else wanted to listen to that but we did and it's like in the end what's the thanks that you get they blame you for everything they keep this code of silence with the abuse and in the end they point the finger at you now you are the one to blame even though they couldn't control themselves they were the ones who were abusing you they did all of those things to you and yet in the end they blame you now everything's all your fault now you have to make amends you have to make things right but you were never the cause of it to begin with you weren't responsible for any of that they made their own choices they made their beds so now they have to lay lay in it or at least they should lay in it but as we know they don't do that they look at the mess that they have created and instead of holding themselves accountable they point the finger at you and of course that blinds them to it they can't even see that you were the right choice they can't see that you were the best opportunity for them they can't see that you were the one who would have always been there for them because if they could see that maybe then they would have treated you very differently because they view us as something temporary well like a means to an end it's like they already know from the very beginning all of the things that they're doing to us they're manipulating and brainwashing us keeping under this keeping us under this spell this illusion it's like they already know at some point oh yeah they're gonna wake up eventually they're gonna realize what a monster I am all of the horrible things that I have done to people all of those times where I just went in pretended like I cared about them and then I just left like I never even knew them like that like they never even existed yes they know that at some point you're gonna wake up to that you're gonna realize exactly what they are so of course from the very beginning they view you as something temporary they know that at some point you're gonna wake up you're gonna realize the truth and that's why they're already ready to blame you for everything to put everything on to you to hold you accountable to say that everything is your fault and they're already doing that from the very beginning once the love bombing phase is over there they go going around saying all of these things about you to other people smear in your name and you don't even see it sometimes even when they're doing it right in front of you it's like at the time you don't even notice you don't see what's going on right in front of your eyes but they're doing it they're saying these hurtful things the skies in it as though they care so they're just trying to help you they've got your best interest in mind and they're just seeking someone else's support that's all just to find out how best to deal with you because they made it out to you as well that you were the problem you're the cause of something that went wrong and you don't see it you don't realize what's going on right in front of your eyes they're smearing your name they're saying these horrible things about you they're going behind your back and from that point on it just gets worse and worse they already know exactly what they're gonna do to you they already know how they're gonna play it they know how they're gonna set it up to make you look like the villain to make it look like you're the one who did them wrong when somewhere deep down in their psyche they already know that they're the ones who did that to you they already know that everything and the way that you are now it's just the result of everything that they did and that if they are treated you right if they are treated you differently then it would have had a different outcome yes at some level in the back of their minds i believe that they do realize that but they're in denial they don't want to accept it but sometimes they may come to you and it's like they have this false epiphany they may even give you a fake apology and this is though they've finally realized where they weren't wrong what they did but it only lasts for a short period of time it isn't long until they go back to normal of how they usually see things and where they blame you for everything because their feelings can change from one moment to the next and they see their feelings as facts whatever they feel that becomes the truth so today they might realize that maybe they did make a mistake maybe they did treat you wrong and then tomorrow they go back to how they see it before they go back to seeing you as the villain again and it's crazy and if you've dealt with a narcissist you will know exactly what i'm talking about how they just switch back and forth they go from being the victim to the villain from one day to the next to blaming you for everything and then in another moment it's like they have this epiphany and it's okay maybe i did get this wrong maybe i can do this better this time i will treat you right and maybe for a few hours a few days they do manage to achieve that but it isn't long until they go back to normal until they go back to treating you how they did before because they will always go back to that that is their default mode of operation their default mode of behavior being self-defensive victim playing establishing power and control over you as their victim because that's just the way that the disorder is set up they've got to be in denial they've got to protect and defend their disorder so that it can continue to function and with that being said they're never really going to realize that you were the right choice for them they're never going to realize that you were their best opportunity even though yes i'm not saying that we're perfect i'm not saying we're these perfect people who do everything right all of the time that's not what i'm saying at all and yes we do get things wrong sometimes but even then a narcissist can tell you to do 10 things before they get home you could complete those nine tasks and maybe you forgot to do one thing or you didn't do it correctly you didn't do it in the exact way that they wanted you to do it they will ignore those nine things that you accomplished and they will focus on that one thing that you got wrong i mean you could be the type of person who gets everything right every day of your life for 10 years and then they will still find this one thing this one mistake that you made this one thing that you said wrong and they will hold on to that for the rest of their lives and use it to define you and portray you as this bad person when that's not even who you are and sometimes they just imagine things in their heads because they have to portray you in this way when you're not even like that you're a good person you're kind respectful you're caring loving you have so many positive kind to rest over luck they continue to overlook all of these positive things about you and yet when you do one thing wrong they have to rub it in your face and now you're bad it's just a vicious cycle there's nothing that you can do nothing you do is going to change it you can't even talk about it you can't confront them on it whatever you do you're going to be labeled as the bad person and that's the only way that it's ever going to go they're never going to see it a different way even though it may look like sometimes in the moment their feelings can change if they feel that they have to even then it's just to regain control over you they're always going to go back to seeing you as the problem and they will cause so many problems for you but by the end of it it will look like you're the problem because there's only so much you can deal with there's just you're just one person there's only so much you can do especially when you haven't got any support because they're never there for you but this is just how it is with these narcissistic people this is just what they will do to you this is just how they will treat you this is just how they're going to be and there's never going to be any consistent changes just when you start to think yes things are finally getting better they're finally beginning to understand and then there they go back to the old cycle of behaviors back to treating you the exact same way that they did before and then you just wonder when is this going to end because all of this work all of this effort that i'm putting in to try to help them to change and they just keep going back to how they were before and it just makes you feel completely inadequate worthless like no matter what you do this person is going to remain the exact same way for the rest of their lives it just makes you think what is your purpose if you can't help you can't change this person because that's just the way that the row is going to be i mean yeah of course there are extremely rare cases where maybe they can make consistent changes there's no actual clinical studies or evidence on this there are meant to be some people youtubers who are meant to have made some consistent changes but how will we ever know for sure how will we ever know but there is one thing that i do know in the past they did a lot of horrible things and that means they are not meant to be trusted not unless you see at the very least a few months preferably a few years of consistent adaptations and positive enforcement positive behaviors i mean yeah even i will say that if you do see a few years of improvements consistent positive changes i mean maybe that person has healed has made some recovery from the disorder or who's to say if they ever had the disorder at all maybe they were just narcissistic how will we ever really know i've asked the difficult part as well i mean very few people will ever experience that so how come we even talk about it but i would imagine that must be a very difficult thing to do to accept someone who has healed despite all of the things that they have done in the past and how do you know if they definitely did have the disorder and if they did actually manage the heal because if they did that took a lot of strength it's a very difficult thing to accomplish but yeah over a long period of time they're never going to realize that you are the best opportunity for them that you were the right choice all along they're never going to realize that and so you should have any hope take away your hope don't ever even expect them to realize any of that anyway i hope you found this video helpful if you did hit that thumbs up button down below let me know what you think in the comment section hit subscribe and click all notifications to be notified when i upload a video in the future and if you would like to help support the channel you can donate by leaving a super thanks in the comment section a super chat in the live chat or you can go to my paypal it's paypal.me-naxifyver and if you would like to book a one-on-one coaching session with me head to my website it is naxifyver.co.uk and also you can follow me on instagram where i have new pictures and videos on my travels which i upload every day on there follow me on instagram it is naxifyver youtube i'd just like to thank you all for joining me on another naxifyver live video i do appreciate all of you and as always i look forward to speaking with you in another live video very soon


G'day, I'm A40 here. Caution, do not climb over the fence. So we're back at Watson's Bay. So I've hiked about 15km from Kujie, about 10 miles, breathing the cliffs. So you can take a ferry to Manly. And this used to be like the military, the Australian military used to control this. So we used to have a fort, I assume, or guns set up there. But now we've gone slack, man. We need our guns here at Watson's Bay to fend off any invaders. It's a culture war, pretty relaxed here. So hold on to hope there's always help. So I never heard an angry word about masks. I haven't seen anyone abuse for wearing a mask. When I see someone wearing a mask outside, well, I mean, I guess some people might question how important that is. But I don't know about you. I just abide by the World Health Organization or their guidelines. So culture war is fairly muted down under. People seem to be having a good time, having a barbie going to the beach, watching the cricket, eating mangoes. My God, is this beautiful a wat. So I mean, they do have protests here against the vaccine and mask mandates. But not terribly intense. So I've been in Australia now seven weeks. I don't think I've heard a cross word. Life is really good in the eastern suburbs of Sydney. So that's Watson's Bay just right ahead. That's where I watched yesterday. So do not climb over the fence, guys, for your own safety. Keeping an eye out for any invaders. Don't see any yellow peril. I think it will be right. And then that's the Sydney Harbour Bridge, mate. Dead ahead, Sydney Harbour Bridge and the Sydney Opera House. And then to the left of the Sydney Harbour Bridge now dead ahead is a CBD. Central Business District of Sydney. So I started walking at noon. Took a break for a nice swim at Bondi Beach. World famous Bondi Beach. Now I think I'm approaching the apex of my trip. I love the cliff walk, man. There's something about cliffs. Just can't stop exploring Sydney. Ah, you beauty. You beauty. Don't think better than the sound of the ocean. Steep cliffs. Fine Harbour. Beautiful Opera House. Very clean and high functioning Central Business District. There's good old Manley. We love Manley, don't we, folks? We're too happy to hate here in Sydney, mate. There's always complaining about the high cost of living here. I just don't get it. I've hardly ever had to reach into my pocket just for the occasional ice cream. And to ride public transport. Just very clean, very efficient, very friendly, very happy experience. A lot of people going on and on about the high cost of living. I just let my sister and my brother pick all that up. My Jewish friends and my non-Jewish friends. And my viewers, my loyal viewers. I'll put the hand in their pocket for me. Come out with 250 bucks. It's very nice, it's very nice. Sorry I lost my gimbal. I know you usually look to me for really high quality live streams. I'm going to come back to the DJI Combo Kit. 500 bucks of live streaming excellence. This is Bondi. Hold on to hope, guys. Don't jump. Hold on to hope. We love our Sydney, don't we, folks? I've had a year's all of my remaining 10 gigs that I paid 50 good bucks for. And it runs out in two days. So I'm just going on a live streaming marathon. So I was here yesterday. I think I want to take the ferry of the Sydney Harbour ferry. Good day, mate. Yesterday when I came with my Watson's Bay, I only had my Oppo. My cheap Android phone. Now I've got my high quality iPhone. So I'll provide you that high definition experience. Okay, still looking for any culture war down under. Not seeing much of it. Not doing much culture war here at Watson's Bay. Walked 15 k's today. Had two good swims. One at Kudgy Beach at 6 a.m. Another one at Bondi at 2 p.m. I think I'm probably coming off on 6 p.m. here. Monday evening. Cliff walk, I love you, mate. So glad that we can share this experience together. Wherever I go, I can take you with me. That's the sun's sharpest. Here we go. How about it? Not much culture war going on at the moment. There's Manly. Australia's a very masculine society. Manly men. Got a Manly. So watch out, unstable cliff edges, slippery surfaces. It's all along the line here. I love a good bush walk. So I don't do this kind of hiking much in LA. Lots of good hiking trails. I've become way too insular. I tend to ride my exercise bike, my stationary bike at home and watch movies. Maybe I need to get out a bit more. Take advantage of Los Angeles. So to the right of me will be the ocean. To the left of me will be the harbor. So we're at Watson's Bay. No climbing.


The question is that amendment 8291.2 in the name of Stephen Kerr, which seeks to amend motion 8291 in the name of Shirley-Anne Somerville, on expansion of vocational and technical qualifications in Scotland secondary schools would be agreed and member should cast their votes now. The vote is closed, point of order, Kenneth Gibson. I was unable to connect to digital platform, I would have voted no Mr Gibson-Karash to repeat that, please. Sorry, I was unable to connect to the digital platform, I would have voted no. Thank you, we'll ensure that's recorded. Point of order, Brian Whittle. Yes. Thank you Mr Whittle, we'll ensure that's recorded. The result of the vote on amendment number 8291.2, in the name of Stephen Kerr, is yes, 53, no 64. There were no abstentions, the amendment is therefore not agreed. The next question is that amendment 8291.1, in the name of Michael Marra, which seeks to amend motion 8291, in the name of Shirley-Anne Somerville, on expansion of vocational and technical qualifications in Scotland secondary schools be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we'll move to a vote and members should cast their votes now. The vote is closed. Point of order, Brian Whittle. Officer, I would have voted yes. Thank you, we'll ensure that's recorded. The result of the vote on amendment number 8291.2, in the name of Michael Marra, is yes, 54, no 65. There were no abstentions, the amendment is therefore not agreed. The final question is that motion 8291, in the name of Shirley-Anne Somerville, on expansion of vocational and technical qualifications in Scotland secondary schools be agreed. Are we all agreed? The motion is therefore agreed.


Welcome to Toffy TV's and Everton News Daily. Marcel Brands has admitted it will be difficult to keep fans away from stadiums as he discussed the Neutral Venue option with a Dutch website. Everton's first game back is due to be against Liverpool and said that if the game is played, obviously it's hard to anticipate that fans won't turn up at the stadium knowing that they can't get in anyway. And says that if a game, the brief first game back was at Southampton saying that's where the game was played, obviously less people would try to get to the area with St Mary's as in. Again, this is what's been spoken about. Teams aren't happy with Neutral Venues and it seems as though they all want to play at their home stadiums and they seem to be a bit of a benden this week where discussions were concerned with that. But the Neutral Venues does make sense at the moment but whether or not teams will play their own grand will have to wait and see on that. Brands also seem to defend Moise Keane for breaking the lockdown rules. He said he's a young player living on his own in a new country and just invited some people round to his house because he's missing things while here in England. He's been fine and obviously we need to move on from it but I'm sure in private he was a lot more staying than that than what he's saying publicly. Apparently, Everton are in pole position to sign Napoli midfield player Alan. This continues to rumble on. This is according to Adrian Napoli, journalist and Manuel Comaroto. Newcastle are being linked with him. Newcastle link with everyone at the moment with regards to their takeover as well but he said that Everton are in pole position to sign the 29-year-old centre midfield player. Obviously, he worked with Antio Loti before and this view has been backed up by former Napoli boss Gianni Di Martio. He says that he believes both Alan and Cula Barli could end up with Everton in the summer. He says that Carlham Antio Loti wants to build a great team there and that both players will be keen to link back up with the Italian at Godderson Park. Who knows? Everton defender John Joe Kenney has suggested to Sky Sport in an interview that he's looking forward to working with Carlham Antio Loti when his loan deal at Schalke expires. He's back in action tomorrow against Bruce Lee Adortman. You can see that on BT Sport but he says that Everton have done fantastic business in getting Carlham Antio Loti in as manager. He says he's a winner wherever he's been. He's done well and so it's a fantastic sign for the Blues. Finally, Everton are continuing to monitor Newcastle midfield player Matty Longstaff who is still in a contract dispute situation at Newcastle United. The Newcastle Gazette reported that Everton are very interested in taking Longstaff. It's rumoured that the fee would only be £400,000 because it's just a development fee for the 20-year-old midfield player so wait and see on that one. Make sure you give the video a thumbs up, subscribe if you haven't and if you want more videos get over and join us on Patreon. See you later.


progressive Christianity, meaning the Bible is outdated and we need to change the Bible to fit the cultural narrative, but I want to tell you something that the Bible is the Word of God and it doesn't need to be updated. It's our life that needs to be changed and we will not embrace progressive Christianity. I'll rather get canceled by the culture instead of get canceled by God. And so the Word of God says clearly that the marriage is supposed to be between a man and a woman. I know this may sound homophobic and and bigoted and all of this stuff. This has nothing to do with hating other people but us loving God's Word and saying this is what the Word of God teaches. And that doesn't change with time. When Jesus meets with a Samaritan woman it's interesting. He says that you had five husbands and the guy you're currently shacking up with is not your husband. So that means that living together with somebody does not constitute marriage because Jesus didn't refer to the man she was living with as her husband.