Okay, so anyways, thanks all to coming to this booth and I need to find some power for my laptop first. So, as I said before, I'm not giving a presentation. I'm not holding the hope we are having a booth together on the Debian policy. So, everyone who wants to move close is very welcome too, because it's really something we do together, not something I'm speaking and you can whatever work on your laptop instead on something else. So, basically, why did I schedule that booth? We have the Debian policy, which is, let's say, has been not too good maintenance status ever, I think, since I joined Debian or even before, I can't say about before. It had a few good times where things were working on. Basically, there are lots of things which should be done in policy. We could look at the bug list in the Debian policy. So, basically, what happens if someone wants a change in policy, mostly an adjustment to what we're actually doing. They should report it by a BTS. People should second it, and if they're not second, it should be incorporated. So, things are sometimes working up to the stage of things as suggested. A few have even seconds, but since a bit of time again, basically, after a second, nothing happens. What I would like to get out from this booth is really that we get it done again, at least for whatever two or three years we can have another booth in three years. So, that would be my plan of this booth. I'm happy that at least a few people came here, and so my question really is, what could we do to improve our Debian policy processes to get it working again? This would be my opinion. If there are other opinions that we should speak about, I think we should discuss it now at the beginning of the booth. So, anyone would like to say something here, and anyone who wants to speak gets a microphone. First of all, I have been lobbying for it for a while, so I'm glad you're doing it. I've been speaking to Ross Albury, who's also our policy maintainer, and he said there were already a lot of changes that presumably had three acts and just had to be written up and committed. So, basically, I guess what we need is some way of making this happen. And some of this, I presume, will end up being basically having enough committees for the policy team. Yeah, basically, there's a little two things. The one is that lots of, I would now say, just grant work, what you just need to be done. There is a patch, which is most acceptable, perhaps except formatting or so, which isn't a hard technical decision to do. The policy lives in a git tree, so basically, even as of today, anyone could clone the git tree, make a git format patches of it, and say, here are my, whatever, 20 bucks I've closed. And I'm very happy to apply any of the patches, which seems reasonable enough and have a bug. So, I mean, it's even easier sponsoring such kind of things than normal packages upload. So, I'm happy to sponsor any policy additions. And I mean, if the two bucks remain open, which are more difficult, it's not an issue for me to, whatever, have a discussion about it. But I really think what we should do is get rid of the easy ones, which we are not doing. So, I'm totally agreeing on that end, as a git tree, and everyone could have access to the git tree. So, any more people needing power? Good, so. Yeah, Sam? Hi, I guess I'd like to delve in. I think you've oversimplified the policy process in a way that... Of course, I did up it. I understand. But there's a part of it that is, I think, important to remember going forward. I'm speaking with my TC hat on as someone who may, you know, from time to time get called on to look at whether the process is working well. When you second a policy proposal, you're doing two things, and I'd like us to remember both of them. The first is you're saying, I think this proposal looks good. The second is you're also saying, according to the process document you guys have written for your internal use, that I've reviewed the process and people have had a chance to discuss it and any objections have been handled. So, when you second a bug, you're not just saying, I think it's good. You're saying, we've done our job of listening to all the people who have concerns. Basically, seconding a policy proposal means, I think the deputy community has decided it's a good thing to do. Not just I've decided, but I think the deputy. It's quite important. If you second it, it means, I personally am convinced the deputy community has done this decision. So, yes, but I'm actually about getting from proposals for seconds isn't the thing we're lacking too badly because I always say it's a proposal and we don't get the second within a certain time. We just checked it, so that's the easier one. The thing is really, what do we do? So basically, how do we clear up the queue and how do we get on with proposals who have had enough seconds and are really just easy to implement but don't get implemented? I mean, for the hard ones where we have fights over, we will find out something. In worse case, we defer to the committee. So, I think that's all not what really worries me. But, I mean, if I look at the commenter list, there are the same people who can find other places in Debian and I don't think one of us is going to do it to work on the, let's say, on the normal policy patches. We're all happy to work on the hard ones, but not on the normal ones. So, my question is just, is there someone here who has interest in doing that? How do we get people for that? Any other proposals? How we could do it better? Do we require, for example, anyone who likes to get a policy proposal in to submit things in the kit format patch style? So, we could just apply it. The specificities of the Debian policy work is that it's also quite English bound and it needs competencies to be able to write reasonable technical English and from what I remember it from past discussions, there is also quite a lot of discussions about how exactly the thing appears in policy, which means that it's not just about having a good idea of how the technical policy should look like in terms of technical terms. It's also how it should be written in proper English. And that means that the competencies to do that are not necessarily the same. I need to even discuss a bit about the proper English part because at least from feedback I got, and you can all hear I'm not a native English speaker. From feedback I got is sometimes that if English is something written by me or I had a lot of fight with Steve about proper English for our release announcement mails, and some of the feedback was that my English was better understanding for non-native speakers. I think the most important thing in policy is to be able to understand it. So if I would choose for a, let's say, sufficient English interpretation of someone everybody can understand and something which is totally perfect in English but unfortunately even Schumanns can't understand it, I know what I'm choosing for. And I'm not lobbying now for the way of English that everybody on the planet can understand because it would not be helpful either, but something in between. So probably you need a mix of people with good English language skills, technical skills and who can work up together to find the appropriate mixture of having good English, good technical understanding, and at least understanding for most parts of the projects because that's actually a thing that we aim for. I can see that Peter is perhaps not happy with what I said or is it just over-interpretating your face? Well, so I think it's quite possible to overstate the requirement of needing knowledge across the project. That was the part I was reacting to because in fact I think there's a big difference between writing policy and editing policy or managing the process of merging bits of policy into our policy document set. And I've always thought there was great value in both tech committee work and in policy work of making sure the people who best understood that area of technology within the project were the ones who were sort of helping to articulate what our policies around that ought to be. So I wouldn't get too hung up about sort of broad domain knowledge as a requirement for being very helpful in the policy process, but somebody somewhere does have to understand the technology. You don't get the right ideas to capture to begin with. Yeah, sure. I don't think we have a disagreement about that. So any more remarks, questions, proposals? It's a both, not a talk. So you should speak, not I. Just clear the queue and then have a cleaner ground to start from. Because the current pile of things looks kind of scary and it's not super interesting work to dive into very old things and get people back into discussing specific patches and things. But the problem with Sprint is that you exclude the others that are not there, but yeah, I don't know. But what you could of course also do is just make a virtual Sprint saying we take from this or that time and have an ISC channel dedicated to it. So it doesn't need to be a physical Sprint. I mean a physical Sprint might be better about even a non-physical Sprint. Yeah. It's really all about what it takes to motivate people to work on things and if the opportunity is some direct social interaction with others who are also interested in it would help. It certainly seems like working the policy backlog and getting things to a more current state is the sort of thing our DPL would probably be happy to allocate some funds for. I wasn't thinking about cement money. I'm just saying that when we start thinking about work in and around the project and certainly the backlog of issues in the policy queue is one example of work that's not being adequately attended to. We just heard Mady talk about the notion of trying to find ways to incent things around the project that need attention, that don't have them to happen and if the idea that having a Sprint or something that gets people more directly socially engaged with each other to tackle a problem like this, if it seems like that would be helpful then I wouldn't be too quick to back way from it. I don't worry too much honestly. I mean if people feel like they're going to be disenfranchised by not being at a Sprint, there have after all been lots of time that's already passed where they could have been commenting on those elements of policy or participating in the discussion. And I think if we do a Sprint we should at least do it not only in presence but also allow people to join to the Sprint via IRC. I mean that's not an additional effort and it really helps. Plus one thing we might be thinking is also reducing the barrier of entry for new things in policy because we can also always undo and if we release a policy with something that didn't have enough seconds or I don't know something we had discussed in the Sprint and it happens to not be the right thing to do then we have another discussion and we upload a new version of the policy. As long as we're not too close to the freeze, it can work. So the next ones are the same and the next one are the same. I will also be doing the Q now. So I guess to ask, I think an interesting question to ask the room would be are there people who, you know, conceptually might be the kind of people who would work on policy who aren't and are there things that disincentive that basically when you think about working on policy are the things that you look at and you go, yeah I don't want to work on policy because X. So can we ask people, you know, are there reasons you're not working on policy? Okay, yes, that's a good question. First I would like still to answer a bit to what you just said. Actually I think we should only put in policy when we are sufficiently convinced that it's good for Debian. What we had been doing in the past was basically to take the other things like the developer sufferance. We could say yes, the current ideas of going in this and that direction, but it was nothing formal. If you fail to do that, yeah, you just fail to do it. But I think really for policy we should rather say this is not what we really expect everyone. If you're not doing it your package is definitely buggy. So what we have had in the past is that people said, oh yes, it would be quite nice if we could make this move and put it in policy but we're not doing it. I think that's not something helpful. So we should only move in policy when it's ready. So yeah, and then I have another thing I would like to ask if we should first get an answer to Sam's question. Are there any things that could make it easier for people here in this room or for people you might think might be interested to work on policy? The room is larger than asked for. You can also answer. By the way, is somebody watching ISE here? I'm not doing it. I can answer for myself is I'm not doing policy because I'm in the TC and I kind of tend to think it kind of conflicts because we are the appeal court for whatever policy work could create as conflict so it doesn't feel perfectly right to do both. Plus it's not super interesting. I mean it's not technical work and it's not necessarily the thing I enjoy doing. I don't feel very motivated to go into doing policy work. On the other hand the setting technical policy is the TC work so it's kind of the same thing anyway. Others to the question? Does one of you want to answer? My other question is what I said before. Do you think it would be too harsh to say we won't ever, basically before we accept seconds on a policy proposal you would like to see the diff in the git format patch way or would you think that would be a reasonable thing to do? I don't have an objection to that. I will note that there are a lot of patches that even if they're not necessarily get format patched they're in patches. I mean the difference when you can get AM and get apply isn't really I mean yeah you got to go come up with a commit comment but it's not really that hard to do that. And those still aren't getting applied. I wouldn't say that all of that will solve everything automatically just to put it this way that it could be part of a solution but it's not the solution. And of course anything which now hasn't been patched I wouldn't say we are just refusing it for the fact that there is not the git format patch. So that would be silly and we're not doing that I would say. For me that's more of an administrative question of the actual policy maintainers that could handholds people in the process so you have this proposal look I've just made it a git version of it so that we can all review it in a better way and by that I'm not expressing any agreement or disagreement on that I'm just making a technical change so that we know exactly what we're talking about and then you push it back to the to the producer and say is that what you mean and that's more of an administrative thing and if that's helpful for the process we should certainly be doing it but it doesn't need to be a condition for starting a discussion for something new to be integrating policy. Not for the discussion but for the seconds perhaps. Yeah but that also means that the maintainers could do this administrative work to transform whatever the discussion output into git. I think his point is that the maintainers are overloaded. The fundamental problem here is the maintainers are not doing there is more maintainer work needed than is getting done so pushing more work onto the maintainers isn't going to make things move faster the claim and I think it's true is that we have a large number of things that are adequately seconded that are not moving forward and that's the problem we're trying to fix so adding more tasks to the people who could move things forward I don't think it's going to help. I guess my question is the obvious solution to this is more maintainers Of course. Are there any other solutions that we're considering are we basically sitting here looking at what do we do to get more policy maintainers is that really the question of this boff is how do we get more policy maintainers? No the question is the question for me is rather is that the only way we could do or other ways so basically I mean I plan to go through this boff later on going other things for us to be done in Debian and I think yes I have some of them so I'd like to find people there but the question is is it the only thing that we reasonably need are more maintainers or are there other ways or do we say well do we need policy at all so the question is are we moving in the right direction so that's basically the question for me because I would like to avoid to say yes I have these ideas so I'm just doing it and pushing it and giving nobody a chance to review what I'm planning but of course if nobody else has ideas I'm just looking for more whatever maintainers, people helping the maintainers you don't need to be a whatever long year Debian developer to be able to do a lot of useful work on the policy especially on cleaning up the patches that already exist Bide? Yeah I actually have a slightly different sense of what I think the problem is at various times in the past we've had sort of enough warm bodies looking at the proposed bits of policy but there's almost a different skill set or a different personality matrix or something required to be the person who actually commits a bunch of those changes and it almost feels to me like the thing we're missing is someone who's sort of willing to be a strong policy editor right now it's that sort of last yes okay we've passed all the gates now let's actually put this into policy and the problem is you don't want that to happen totally willy-nilly because even if there's been good discussion around elements of policy there's still sort of I don't know how to put this exactly there's still sort of an element of style or something associated with sort of that final gating of what actually gets merged into a policy document and well did I understand your point about you know we shouldn't be afraid to let things into policy that turn out to be mistakes that we end up having to take back out on the flip side I've always liked the fact that our policy sort of trailed best practice and that you know policy in some sense was the codification of sort of everything we had learned that was actually good about the packaging process and about making a system that really works well and integrates together and we don't let policy sort of lead implementation so there's a bunch of sort of balancing bits in here and it has been surprising to me at times when we were in a situation where it seemed like there were people who were paying attention and commenting on proposed policy elements but that some of them just didn't actually get there. There are some people in this world and we certainly have had the pleasure of having some of them involved in our recent past who are really really good at sort of bringing things like this to closure and it's not a skill set everybody has. I fully agree to that so yes but now on the other side there are a few patches which are not so hard to, there are some that's really very important to make sure the wording is okay. There are some patches where you can just say yeah well it looks most okay and if there are some words not perfect we can just merge up an enhancement later on so I think we need to find the balance but it's not a surprise that the people who are actually policy uploaders I mean at some times with the last time there were two TC members on the four members list of the TC members it's not necessarily a surprise for it so yeah but on the other hand finding someone who is not as deep in the project might be quite helpful as well I think or at least I think we need to try it out because we don't have a chance otherwise to get on it. So don't you have a microphone? Hello, so I was at the tech cat above yesterday or the other day and I remember them saying we don't have a lot to do other than finding new members would this be a possible area of work where we could I will not just wait because I'm from the others to answer because I won't be in the committee long anymore. Well the constitution says we can. The question is whether it makes sense to take a look at the project as a general thing for us to do it. I kind of see that as last resort like if the Deben policy process is so broken that the only recourse we have is get the TC do that administrative work and not to dismiss any of that work but that administrative work nevertheless then we might get involved but I really see that as last recourse and it shouldn't be that way. So I think I would be hesitant politically to do that. That said I agree with that idea that if that needs doing you know if all else fails I absolutely agree that it's worth doing and I should go and twist my arm. The reason I'm politically hesitant is we had some people who are fairly heavily involved in the policy process recently fairly upset about a TC decision and I think it's nice to be sensitive to that. I think it's also nice that if we are going to do a bunch of policy work there's a chance that there will be disagreement about something that happens and it's nice to have the TC one level removed to better handle that disagreement. And so yes I absolutely agree that have the TC do it is a fine is something that is better than not having it done. But I think you know it would not be my first choice. So now with my policy maintainer head on I would say of course everyone who is on the TC right now is somebody who I would be loved to be welcome on the policy because I know I could it. However I can understand the reason for not doing so much there. I also have been used to not keeping a bit of distance from policy with my TC head on things will now change but yes I can fully understand you there. I think Martin also. I was just given the second microphone. Okay. So I think other more things otherwise I think we seem to boil down really to we need to find people when you are simply finding people and thinking about a sprint or whatever else is helping us. Maybe one last word about the TC involvement. I think what we've basically said is that the TC as a body involvement doesn't make sense unless dot dot dot but involving the TC members in discussing that the various patches and all of that totally make sense and we should probably let individuals get involved but not in front line. I think getting input from the appropriate people and I think lots of the team members are the appropriate people for different parts of the policy is a very good thing we should do. But that's something else as a person who are driving the process. So I agree it would probably not be good if the TC members or the TC as a body would drive the process however in cases where the input would be quite valuable. I'm just going to ask this because it's something where I'm surprised it didn't come up and I'm pretty good at kicking at elephants in the room. So I will note that in the last year and a half we've kind of found a couple of people who walked away from the policy process frustrated and upset. Is that actually I guess I'm surprised I think we should ask ourselves whether like talk to people who might be potential new contributors and ask is that an environment you'd feel comfortable working in or does the level of hostility in some of the discussions make it harder for you to contribute there. I don't know what the answer is. I know for myself it would that is not a part of the project I would really enjoy jumping into. But maybe it isn't maybe for the people who would be willing to do the work it isn't an issue. If it is an issue I think we should work on fixing it. Yes basically what is up in my mind for the moment but that might be very wrong. So it's really I mean there are things which are in a non-hostile environment like this is a patch which was just done and nobody disagreed and so on so we can just apply it. I think that's a non-hostile environment and there are more let's say difficult discussions. If somebody is going to say I am going to work on policy but I'm keeping out of all those difficult discussions that would still be very great. So I think what we should do is speaking upfront with people and saying you should choose which part of policy process you want to tackle just with a non-hostile part or are you willing to tackle the hostile part. Why do you think you're going to be able to tell which ones are hostile? You will notice it's a moment where they get hostile and you can just say okay I'm dropping a system. Which might be okay if you have the set of mind to say it's okay to just stop working on this bug because it's getting hostile now and some other else might take over or not. That's something else and if there's a feeling oh I started with taking care of it I'm going to finish it. I think it's okay to say this is getting hostile I'm not taking care of it anymore. So and then yeah perhaps it might be better to just share a source of the people who don't mind about being hostile comments or already have had their share in Debian so that the experience of that takes the hostile ones and the other ones take the not so hostile ones or at least until they get hostile. Just an idea but that really depends on the people who are actually doing the work what they prefer. So I'm not saying you need to do a system that way but whoever feels comfortable with what we should do whatever is comfortable with people doing the work. Okay one silly idea about recruiting would be to use the abuse of the fact that the TC the TC terms expire and we have multiple people in that room that have seen or will see their TC term expire and we should probably talk to them about becoming policy maintainers. So you want to source the policy maintainers from the TC team? I mean it's two new people per year. Actually we already did. There's one right behind you you could start with. I think we could play tonight a round of Mao or policy. So you're absolutely determined to have me not involved in policy. I said oh we can find out later on. You can choose whatever you would like to play. You can't figure out policy until you violate it. You have good ideas. So reverse engineer the rules. That's what LinkedIn is about anyway. I think the discussion starts to get more funny but I don't think we get further points. So I would propose to just close the session here. Thanks for coming and if somebody of you who was not saying so much or someone who was saying much would like to get involved, someone who is watching the video please feel free to contact me directly on IRC, by mail or whatever. I would really be happy to have more people involved in that area. Thank you.


What's up everybody? Jason here for jaspyscasebase.com 22 23 bowman university chrome basketball just sold out This is a four box break random first letter first name number two and again guys 17 total spots that we're getting random from letter below of course as a Example if you get randomized letter V and we pull a victor wabanyama that'll go to letter V And there's the letters with some combos as well. Here's the names teams or names and letters Let's roll it is a one and a six. I've been rolling a lot of sevens today one two three four five six seven Should I go gamble? One of six seven Brian down to James seven one two three four five six seven Seven times seven seven EG down to M So Brian you have EG Tristan with C Eddie with R Gary with a Travis with T Ed with LH Michael Coleman K James Jimmy F. Kev D Daniel you have E Tristan with WZ as well as B and S Ed with J Brian with NO J Jimmy with MP or PM I should say And I don't think there'll be any trades, but in the meantime guys remember we have two stacks here We'll go one two three for the left four five six for the right Let's see if we can generate one of those right there And it's gonna be one so one two three so this next four boxes would be for the next break And yeah, I don't think there'll be any trade. So let's just close the trade window Yeah, W there has to be some right or at least one You're not too many Obviously a lot of these letters are very heavy. We like J and C and Stuff like that are actually guys, I'm gonna rip all the boxes And then we'll go through the hits. It used to be a lot better a few years back I wasn't you following like the ducks, you know big stuff football families to follow them a lot when like Boucher was there Dylan Brooks, you know Jordan Bell There were some good couple years that Oregon did were do really well I haven't followed too much college basketball as much Yeah, I mean props to the people that watch every thing I feel like if you watch every single sport and specialize in it, then you're probably not like I Mean you're probably not watching like I mean, I don't I kind of I love sports more than anything But I kind of mix and match and love like obviously watching like shows and movies and stuff Specialized and take the time to learn all the players and sport every sport. I mean, it's crazy I'm amazed one that I've really fallen off man. I used to love it when I was younger I used to watch all the pay-per-views and stuff like that But then when I started working here and working at night especially on the weekends and kind of killed that for me because Yeah, I can like stream it if anything, but I Don't know nothing like watching it with friends and family, you know So, I mean, I still watch it every once in a while, but I don't watch it as frequently as I used to I'm definitely a football guy first, too. I love obviously hockey as well, I Wouldn't say I'm special specialized in it But like I follow obviously my team's more than anything and know the big teams and the players and stuff like that I haven't really paid attention to more of the younger classes with what it is the last few years, but You know, I love me some basketball, too I could talk basketball baseball one that I love baseball a little playing it, but It's just such a long season for me. I always just that's just what it is for me and being a daughter's kind of honestly I Get hyped for the beginning of the season watch a couple series, right? Yankees in town Tristan Yankees in town But I usually just get hyped for playoffs and like I said daughters is the last X amount of years. I've always just kind of made the playoffs and Gone far with loss So, yeah, bj pen Gsp ice man chocolate down. I was a big all over in pen I looked in a lot. I still have the Diaz brothers Nick and Nate speaking of Yankees Dodgers. I think that games should be starting already, right? I don't want to try to make it out there with Chad and go to that Yankees game on Sunday night baseball the seats that I wanted to sit in way too expensive, but also My buddy had already sold those seats long time ago. I'm a little picky when I go to like sporting events I hate myself for that because I could be saving a lot more money But I just look if I'm gonna look like a nice working a man football baseball like to have good views Myself with that. See if Freddie Freeman can continue his history. I think he's at what like 19 games or 20 Definitely been killing it and then I'll be this Last 20 games and throughout the season actually is on a tear top 10 moments of Dodger Yankees number 10 is Our Nick Smith, Jr. Nick Smith, Jr. again there and then we got a Colin Chandler green That is number 83 out of 99 letter C going to Tristan. There's Katelyn Clark. I Probably sells pretty well have a Jalen hood Shafino and that is another one letter J Which is Ed? Derek Lively Schumer not number Jordan Hawkins another one for letter J add number to 299 There's a Katelyn Katelyn Clark base Kalski and we have a Jared McCann another one for letter J. That's like a yellow to 75 Another one for Ed Kaleef battle Schimmers are not numbered Orange Avery Anderson letter a Gary Prescott six out of 25 Oh Redemption is Victor webinar redemption I thought he was signing some of them. Oh, there we go. We got one Victor webinar, so maybe Didn't sign all of them, but that is an autograph parallel of Victor Web and Yama going to Daniel with letter V one spot mojo He you know what you know what it could have been Mike is that? When they pack this out He didn't have it ready, but that photo that they did what could have happened was He already signed them. He just couldn't make it into the pack out. So Whoever you know Daniel redeems that He might get that really really quick. I mean, we don't know if it's just the parallels or not, but I Haven't seen on eBay yet, but like I said, um, I have a feeling if anything jet Howard is They probably just didn't make it into the to the pack out. So They put redemptions in there, but he might already have signed them all Brandon Slayer Another Caitlyn Clark. Oh Wow, what a box Caitlyn Clark in Victor orange 23 out of 25. I'll probably still sell pretty well. What a box. Also, did we get a bonus auto on this? I feel like that when be might have been an extra auto You've only done two boxes so far, right? So these came together three Four Five. Yeah, we did get a bonus auto There's there was an extra auto in there So again guys, I don't know if Wemby is a redemption all them, but at the same time guys, you know what though What if Wemby what if you get an extra auto indicates you get a Wemby? That'd be kind of cool. I Know man, but you have gotten a lot of Caitlyn Clarks though Which definitely helps and who knows maybe they're still more Caitlyn Clark autos in here. That can be black and we got Jaden Zachary Letter J gonna add another Invictus JJ starling Brandon Miller Two of those redemptions sold on eBay 2k and 2.3k and I do it's wild right and letter B is going to Tristan for Brandon Miller Number two guys. There's also Short prints of Wemby base and colors So remember he is a short print.  Oh Nice, it's already sent out to you. That's what I'm saying So I'm not too entirely sure if like I said that photo of him signing his autographs I mean he made it in the packet maybe the color ones but not the base But I have a feeling if anything he just didn't make it in the pack out Jordan Hawkins But his autographs are already live ready to roll You know kind of just like Joe Burrow was like in contenders and stuff like that where like they just couldn't squeeze it in but But if you if you hit it, it'll ship to you right away Which could be the case Continue on guys last last box here another Caitlyn Clark there I've seen a lot more Caitlyn Clark in this box of these four boxes or two Nice Derek lively. So you have a red and now you have a gold first 26 out of 50 out of Duke Derek letter D is Kev. There you go, man a red and a gold down Yeah, maybe it's a hot case Jalen Washington Some nice stuff here guys the first four boxes might have been just a little bit of an introduction to this Now we're starting to get the hot stuff And then Ernest Letter E going to Brian E. G. There's another Caitlyn Clark there Another Caitlyn Clark man, you're only seeing one Caitlyn Clark in the first box First four boxes at 39 Chris Murray letter K is Michael Cohen Julian Phillips I don't 100 There's a lot of Yankee fans at this game, Chris And there's a lot of Yankee fans that follow the Yankees here in LA too They're like the Dodgers right in the Yankees. They're all global Alrighty folks, what a very nice four boxes here a lot of Caitlyn Clark, which is very nice. We got a gold or red More Caitlyn Clark. We've got an orange Caitlyn Clark And then of course women Diyama Chrome Prospect Autos. So appreciate it folks. Number three. We posted up next jaspyscasebreaks.com


Okay, so I'm not being dramatic, but this art supply literally scares me because I watched the video once when people are like, getting self-combust and you have to remove these cloths in a certain manner or you can set fire to things. So I've always been like, hmm, I don't really want to try them, but I have to at some point, right? So I went into town and I grabbed myself some lovely, some lovely primary colors and a white oil color. These are so expensive, they're like £10 each, £11.50. There's this new art supply store in town and they pretty much have not too much stuff, but I wanted to try oil because that seems to be what they sell in my town for some reason. Everyone, I don't know why, it's kind of more prominent than other types of paints. I bought some turpentine because I know that you have to use that to sort of water it down instead of water. Not sure yet. Going to watch some tutorials, so don't come for me in the comments if that's not correct. I also bought some new brushes. These are watercolor brushes because I really like the Acroel. I've used one of these before and I really like them, so I just bought some new brushes because it was time I needed some new brushes because yeah, I don't really take care of things apparently. I'm very scattered, so I'm sorry. I also bought this for like obvious reasons. This is an eraser and here's an angry poo, so I mean, I also got this rectangular plastic palette. It was a pound, so which is like, I don't know, a dollar or two because I wanted to use a different palette for the oils. I mean, I don't know how if this is big enough. Probably not. I don't know what I'm doing yet. I just know that I wanted to try oils for a while because it's the only paint that I've never tried. So I had to, I have to. I also bought this the other day. I thought you guys would be interested in this. This is a giant bottle thing and I'm going to use it for watercolours basically because it's absolutely massive and I think this was about six euros in Spain, which is like, I don't know, five dollars. Pretty worth it, right? And it looks cool. So you know, there's a blast of it. Also bought this book today because the bookshop that you see me in this clip is brand new and yeah, I'm going to do something with this book on Saturday. So click the the bell notification. If you want to see what I do, don't worry, I'm not painting on this book. This brand new beautiful, beautiful cover, but I'm going to do something with it. So keep, keep an eye out. So let's get started. Actually, no, I'm going to watch some tutorials because I don't want to set fire to my home. See you in a minute. I don't know why. Autistic. I've done some research and I'm not too scared now. I think what I'm going to do is just use the oil colors by themselves and not use the turpentine because I think that's just for cleaning the brushes. But they also said in the video that you can use oil, oil, you can use water and soap to clean your brushes. And I don't have the stuff to make the drying time a bit quicker. So I'm just going to go for it and test it out really. I have a feeling that the consistency of these will be a little bit obviously oily, but I feel like I could probably use them in a similar fashion that I use gouache without water. So I'm going to test them out. If you guys know any tips, let me know. But yeah, I've got this old canvas I've had for like ages. I'm going to use that because obviously the drying times for oil is hours and hours and hours. So I don't want to use my sketchbook and not be able to shed it. So we're just going to super dive right into just using this canvas I have. And let's see how we how we go with it. Basically, right felt that canvas. OK, yeah, I mean, it is what it is. This canvas is kind of old and neglected. So OK, let's try it out. I'm just going to start by pouring out these primary colors I got. I wasn't sure what red, blue and yellow to get. So this one is just called Windsor Red. Please don't come for me in the comments if I'm doing it completely wrong. Because remember, I've never done this before. So please have some kindness. I probably need a much bigger palette because I was looking online and people are using big sheets of glass, which is very aesthetic and pleasing. But not really ideal when you have a lot of cats in the house because they will just jump up and probably spread that everywhere. I'm wondering how much to use paint wise, because like usually I use a lot of more paints than this. But I'm having a feeling that with oil paints, a little goes a long way. At least I'm hoping. I've also got some refined linseed oil that I had when I was trying to make the inks. I thought I needed this, but I didn't. So I could use a little bit of this as well, I suppose, if I need to. So I've got kind of a hard bristle brush as well, because I think that is supposed to be more useful for oil colors because of the way like the buttery consistency of it, which I've heard is the case. So yeah, let's dive into it. I think I'm going to prep my canvas a little bit here as well. I think I want to use a little bit of linseed oil. I honestly don't know what I'm doing. So I need also a cloth to wipe oil paints on. Apparently this can combust as well. So you've got to be really careful. I mean, I saw somebody say that they could combust, but I didn't really see anything in my research that said that this can combust by itself. I think if you use it with the turpentine or something, then it can be dangerous. But let's see.  Yeah, I don't know what to do. I think we're just going to go for it. I don't know if I'm doing it correctly. I think I need some medium to thin it out slightly.  So far, not hating it. I need one of those like, creepy things. Creepy things. That's the technical term for a palette knife. In case you didn't know, of course, like, why would you? Only the most supreme artists know the technical term, scrapy knife. I really want like more pinkies. Oh, why have I done that? I'm not sure why I did that. Oh, the buttery goodness. Apparently oil paints are super forgiving, which is good for me because look what I just did. This was gouache. I would already have the canvas completely full. So that is a point of gouache. I'm going to change the settings of my light as well because it's super shiny. So far, not so scary. Not great, though, either. Not great, not feeling good. Not feeling great. But let's see. Let's see. Not hating it. There's a bit of a shine from the light, but I think there's some, like, really nice textures going on or lack thereof. I don't know. I quite like the way it's looking so far, even though it's just a blue area and me blocking out some certain things in the painting. I think it's looking kind of cool. Yeah, not hating it, which is something I always thought I would hate. I thought I would hate using oils. But yeah, kind of enjoying it, to be honest. Kind of liking, experimenting with a new medium. So I'm going to just delve into time lapse mode and I'll see you at the end for my thoughts. Call it there. I definitely had some issues trying to put the white down and layer that. I don't know if anybody has any tips for that, but when I was trying to layer down the clouds, I found it really difficult. I don't know if I have to wait for it to dry a little bit, but yeah, I don't know how long it takes to dry or anything. But I think that as a first attempt is pretty cool. The windows, I don't like so much. I wish I could go back in with a little bit more detail, but I find it quite difficult to add detail. So I don't know. I think for a first attempt at using oil colors, paints, it's a pretty good attempt. So let me know what you guys think. If you'd like to see me use oils more, I think I'm obviously going to try and use them a bit more because I've invested in them now. But let me know what you think. And yes, it wasn't so scary in the end, but still, I'm not sure if I prefer them to wash yet. I think I prefer wash still, but I have to give it a bit more of a chance, don't I? So, OK, thanks for watching, guys. Please like and subscribe or that jargon. And hopefully we'll see you next time. And also, thank you to my patrons, you guys are the bomb. Thank you. Bye. I just set up my new ring light and I just had to show you guys because somebody loves it. Make a purring, different settings. She really likes it. Ooh, too bright. Do you think mochi? Do you think? Good girl. All right, that's enough mochi camera. That's enough mochi time. Ooh.


Northeastern Nigeria has been terrorized by armed groups for nearly a decade, killing thousands of people and forcing even more from their homes. In 2017, nearly 1.8 million people were estimated to be living in displacement in Nigeria. Hanatu fled her home in January of 2015 when armed men carried out a series of mass killings in the town of Baga and the surrounding area. My name is Hanatu Yusuf. I am originally from Cameroon. I moved to Baga and lived there for 12 years until Boko Haram displaced us. In Baga, we were from here. Having a nice life, we had a shelter. Boko Haram attacked us, burned our houses, burnt all our wealth. We left with nothing. We suffered a lot in their hands. We slept in the bush. No food, no water, no place to sleep. I was fleeing without any clothes until I reached another bush. There, I saw this t-shirt and I took it to cover my body. I spent seven days walking until I reached Mongunu. It's in Mongunu where I finally entered a government car to Maduguri. I first came here with my husband. We spent two years together in the camp. Then he died. Now, we are suffering. I have five children and four grandchildren. This t-shirt kept me safe. It's very valuable to me and I don't want to lose it. When I pick it up, I remember the difficulties I face and tears fall from my eyes. No, I will never throw it away because it feels like my husband too. It protects me. I put it inside my pillowcase and sleep on it because I don't want the kids to play with it. I can't leave this t-shirt behind.


In this video, I will describe the sensory transduction mechanisms and sensory pathways for the gustatory modality. Gustation is commonly known as the sense of taste. To enable the gustatory modality, molecules dissolved in the saliva activate gustatory receptor cells that are specialized receptor cells located in the taste buds. There are five distinct tastes that have been identified by physiologists. These are salty, sour, sweet, savory, and bitter. The transduction mechanism for the salty taste involves sodium ions entering the gustatory receptor cells through a cation channel embedded in the plasma membrane. This influx of cations leads to depolarization of the gustatory receptor cell, stimulating the release of neurotransmitters onto the dendrites of the afferent neurons. The transduction mechanism for the taste of sour involves hydrogen ions entering the gustatory receptor cell through a cation channel, while simultaneously hydrogen ions inhibit the efflux of potassium through a potassium channel. The influx of cations with the simultaneous decrease of cation efflux leads to a net influx of cations causing depolarization. This depolarization then stimulates the release of neurotransmitters onto the dendrites of the afferent neurons. The transduction mechanism for the sweet taste involves a sugar molecule like sucrose binding to a G-protein-coupled receptor on the surface of gustatory receptor cells in the tongue. The G-protein-coupled receptor activates the enzyme adenovil cyclase, leading to the production of the second messenger molecule cyclic AMP. As cyclic AMP accumulates in the cytosol of the gustatory receptor cell, it inhibits a potassium channel. As potassium channels close, this creates depolarization that stimulates the release of neurotransmitters from the gustatory receptor cell onto the dendrites of afferent neurons. The transduction mechanism for the savory or umami taste involves the amino acid glutamate binding to a G-protein-coupled receptor on the surface of the gustatory receptor cell. The G-protein will activate the enzyme phospholipase C, leading to the production of the second messenger molecule anasatol triphosphate abbreviated here IP3. As the IP3 concentration of the cytosol in the gustatory receptor cell increases, IP3 will bind to a calcium ion channel in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum known as the IP3 receptor. IP3 will activate opening of this calcium channel and calcium will exit the endoplasmic reticulum moving into the cytosol, where calcium will then stimulate the release of neurotransmitters from the gustatory receptor cell onto the dendrites of the afferent neurons. The transduction mechanism for bitter is very similar to the savory taste. Bitter molecules such as the theobromine molecule found in chocolate that gives chocolate the bitter taste will bind to G-protein-coupled receptors on the surface of gustatory receptor cells. And these G-protein-coupled receptors will activate the enzyme phospholipase C to produce the second messenger anasatol triphosphate. IP3 then activates the IP3 receptor calcium channel on the endoplasmic reticulum leading to the movement of calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum into the cytosol which will then stimulate the release of neurotransmitters from the gustatory receptor cell onto the dendrites of the afferent neurons. The sensory pathway for the gustatory modality begins with gustatory receptor cells releasing neurotransmitter to stimulate the dendrites of afferent neurons. These afferent neurons relay information through axons that travel into the cranium in the facial nerve, cranial nerve number seven. The axons of the afferent neurons will form synapses with neurons in the medulla oblongata in a region known as the solitary nucleus of the medulla oblongata. Then neurons in the medulla oblongata will relay information to the thalamus and neurons in the thalamus will relay information to the primary gustatory cortex in the insular lobe of the cerebral cortex where the perception of taste will be processed.


UC Berkeley's Bear Stage is an organization that encourages creative development through performing arts. It offers a platform for student actors, directors, writers, producers, technical designers and musicians of all experienced levels to practice and develop their craft in a student-supported environment. This semester, Bear Stage is putting on the musical cabaret. We spoke to members of the production for more information. So my name is Mitch Pastore. My pronouns are they, he, I'm directing cabaret. So I've been kind of in charge of like the artistic vision as well as the blocking. When asked about their interest in directing, Mitch highlighted their love of theater as an avenue for exploring other creative outlets. So I've been doing theater like my entire life. I love theater so much. Anyway I can be a part of it. I try to. I've always usually been a performer in recent years. I've tried costume designing and yeah, I recently got into directing class and now directing the show. But yeah, I think it's just a really amazing outlet to like express all of my love for theater and like all the creativity I have. I feel like it's like my baby. I'm like I've never been able to put on a show before with like everything I love. Like I can just make it exactly how I want it to be. CalTV also spoke to choreographer Cura Wafers about the process of developing movement behind the numbers. For each individual song, I've probably spent around 12 to 15 hours on each one. In terms of developing choreo, part of it is just you got to read the script like 10 million times and then like really understand the themes of the number that you're working with. The show is really dark and has a lot of like really complex themes and a lot of the numbers that I've had to work with actually deal with some like sensitive topics. And so going into those numbers really paying attention to like working with care and like leading with compassion. And then in terms of like making choreo, very often I just listen to the song over and over and over again and I just start moving. I will be in like a little practice room or whatever and I will just start moving and see what sticks. So many of the numbers in cabaret are really like iconically choreographed by Bob Fossey. So it's one of those things where like, okay, I'm not going to copy what he's doing in any sense of the word, but it would be impossible to do a production of cabaret without like at least kind of paying homage to what made the original so great. So there was a lot of like searching through Fossey source material and then just kind of like messing around, seeing what stuck and really trying to figure out how I could tell the individual stories of each number and figure out how to convey the like really important themes of each number through dance and movement. Skylar Davidson, managing artistic director for Bear Stage, give insight into her experience playing the MC in this production. I think like first of all, one of the really cool things about the MC at least through the vision that Mitch is trying to propagate is that they're sort of everybody and nobody in terms of their gender. I'm not even sure that they really have one because they're sort of just a metaphor for all of the characters in the show, but also I sort of have created like my own through line just within my own conception of the character as the MC. I think that one of my favorite parts is you know developing a character outside the bounds of like okay well here's Sally and Cliff and this is their plot line and my songs are supposed to like amplify like their struggles but I think coming up with ways to tell my own story like through portraying their narrative has been one of the most exciting parts and definitely like one of my favorite songs this thing is it's called I don't care much and it happens sort of the end of the second act and it is just a moment of absolute numbness and sort of I would even say like acceptance of sort of like the atrocities that are starting to occur because it does take place in the 1930s in a pre-holocaust pre-World War II environment so I also think developing yeah that through line within that historical context has been really interesting in terms of challenging aspects of this character I would say that it's emotionally a very draining show generally but I think like one of the great things about like being in a show is that when you enter the stage you sort of like put on a certain hat and when you leave a stage it's not that that experience goes away but you're sort of able to be like okay like and this is the present and this is what I've learned from this experience and this is what we can take with me like moving forward. I guess like I just think it's important for us to engage in history and I think that this is a really like accessible way to do that because it's theater and it's exciting and it's fun and yes we can explore those dark moments we also do it in a space that's like very welcoming and in strives to pull in people who maybe would be like more hesitant to engage in like the darker sides of like our ancestors. Skyler cites a few reasons she returns to the organization every semester. I would definitely say the sense of community and camaraderie all of my best friends are from bare stage my current roommate of two years is I met her like at auditions freshman fall and honestly I think that one of the coolest things about bare stage is that if you ask anybody most people aren't theater majors or dance majors they're usually like anything else and they just happen to really enjoy doing theater because I feel like one thing that we really do well as a pre-professional company is provide sort of an avenue for people who just really love the arts to come in and do their thing like in addition to all of these other passions that they may be exploring through like other academic avenues. To learn more about the organization and future productions go to ucchoral.berkeley.edu slash groups slash bare stage or follow at bare stage productions on instagram reporting for cal tv news i'm lindsay mongman


Hey survivors and frivers, in this video I am going to be talking about how the narcissist wants to make you suffer. This is likely to be quite a triggering video and may upset you, but I think it's important that you hear this. Please like, comment, share and subscribe. If you would like to donate, my PayPal link is in the video description. If you are interested in one-on-one coaching, you can email me at Narcisfivecoaching at gmail.com. Narcisfive Immersion Dice is available on our Teespring page. If you are interested in purchasing your own Narcisfive T-shirt or mug, the link is in the video description. The narcissist wants to make you suffer. The narcissist wants you to experience or be subjected to something bad or unpleasant. They want to watch you experiencing highly unpleasant physical sensations. They want to torture you. Many of their actions or behaviors involve inflicting severe pain on their victims as a form of punishment or to force them to say or do something. They want you to experience severe physical, mental or emotional suffering. And they want to watch your experience. They want to watch you going through it. Sometimes they can be careless and push someone over the edge to the point where they cannot come back. This could be due to severe physical torture where the victim loses their life or it could be from mental or emotional suffering where the victim develops psychosis. But most narcissists will take note of your pain threshold. They will study your past experiences and how your brain or physical body responds to suffering in the present moment. This helps them to identify your pain threshold. So most narcissists will understand the magnitude or intensity, the measurable amount of force that must be exceeded for a certain reaction, result or condition to occur or to be manifested. Many narcissists are sadists. They do get off on your pain and suffering.  They get pleasure from intentionally causing you pain or suffering, spoiling or ruining an opportunity or a chance of success. You do not feel any concern about it unless it could be potentially fatal. Even then the concern is not for you, it is more about how they could potentially lose their source of supply. Narcists want you to experience an extreme state of disturbance, confusion, uncertainty or lack of order. They want to torture you to a point where you can no longer probably assess what is going on or where you are close to death, just so they can resuscitate you or revive you from the unconsciousness or apparent death, making you active again and able to experience the pain or suffering all over again. In a perfect world they would receive great satisfaction from repeating this process an indefinite number of times or until you are no longer able to function or perceive the world around you. Of course some narcissists have made this a reality and acted it out in real life due to their poor impulse control. Most narcissists understand the consequences of doing this in real life but that doesn't stop them from finding alternative methods of achieving the same satisfaction or thrill. They find covert paths of aggressive ways of inflicting mental or emotional pain on you. It is more difficult for the outside world to detect but still gives them the opportunity to cause you to experience an extreme state of disturbance, confusion, uncertainty or lack of order, as empaths or highly sensitive people. When we hurt someone we might experience guilt, remorse or other feelings of distress. It is very different for sadistic emotional predators like narcissists. When the narcissist causes or observes a person's suffering it provides them with some form of emotional benefit or a sense of reward. They have a natural motivation to inflict suffering on other people. Even going out of their way or at a personal cost. Narciss will target specific situations where they can exploit, humiliate or take advantage of people for their own personal pleasure. There is a link between sadistic traits and aggressive behaviour. Narciss will use aggression to provoke fear within their victims. It provides them with an initial feeling of pleasure or reward. But then they begin to feel negative emotions as they start to reflect on their shame. Narciss do not want to reflect on their shame as it is painful for them. So they will try to distract themselves by seeking more pleasure or reward and causing more pain and suffering in their victim. The pleasure or sense of reward motivates them to repeat these sadistic aggressive behaviours. The more they repeat these behaviours the more it reinforces and promotes a larger pattern of sadism or aggressive behaviour within them. It becomes a part of their character and personality. It becomes a lifestyle as they sink deeper and deeper in addiction. They just assume the dominant role to release their feelings of frustration or resentment. And then for once they feel like they are in control. They take pride in causing you pain or suffering, spoiling or ruining your opportunities or chance of success. They see them as achievements, something to be proud of, they are pathologically envious and jealous of you and this makes them want to watch you suffer even more because in their minds you are causing them pain by being who you are or having the qualities, talents or positive traits which you possess.  They can't possess your qualities, talents or positive traits. They can't have what you have or get what you get. So now they want to destroy you.  They compare themselves to you and then feel like they are nothing in comparison.  They experience pain from dealing with these emotions. It is overwhelming for them. They try to release these emotions by dominating the situation, taking control of you and then limiting or restricting anything that you might otherwise achieve or obtain which would then cause them further pain or emotional distress. Of course the reality is that they are not really in control and while their dominant behaviour may initially release their feelings of frustration or resentment it only makes them experience more shame. Where does this sadistic behaviour come from? I believe that at some point in their lives they experience some form of pain or trauma. It is likely to be more than just one experience and these experiences cause the Narcissus to experience some form of pain or trauma by people who may have been saddest. Maybe they took pleasure from it. Maybe they even smiled or laughed at the Narcissus. Or maybe they didn't intend to cause the Narcissus any harm. Either way the Narcissus assumed that this was intentionally designed to hurt them. No one was around to comfort the Narcissus or validate what they had experienced. Maybe all the Narcissus needed at that time was a hug or someone to tell them that they are going to be okay and that person was wrong for doing what they did or maybe they didn't intend to hurt them just someone to validate what they had experienced. Followed by some form of security or comfort the Narcissus received no security or comfort. Maybe they were told that they were weak or they deserved to experience the pain. From that point on the Narcissus learned a few things. There is nothing wrong with intentionally causing another person pain or suffering. You can find pleasure or excitement in causing or observing someone's pain. They don't have to validate or comfort victims following a painful or traumatic experience or they can pretend as though they don't even notice the pain or suffering that they are causing their victim. You can tell how a person is thinking or feeling by observing their actions or behaviors. By observing a Narcissus out of control or aggressive actions or behaviors it is obvious that they have experienced severe pain and suffering throughout their lives and while they can feel or express sympathy for someone who has experienced something like this. At a certain point in your life you should develop some level of awareness of how your out of control or aggressive actions or behaviors are affecting people. Remember Narcissus is a choice. They choose to act and behave in this way. They act dominant or as though they are in control. Observe their actions or behaviors, demonstrate nothing but weakness and inferiority. Remember you can tell how a person is thinking or feeling by observing their actions or behaviors. The Narcissus actions or behaviors demonstrate that they are experiencing hatred, anger, envy and jealousy, frustration, resentment and shame. The truth is they are too weak to reflect on these emotions and deal with them. Instead they choose to project them onto other people so that they can express those emotions for them. Only weak people engage in these types of behaviors. The Narcissus wants to make you suffer, to distract themselves from their own suffering. They want to keep you in a state where they are able to control your emotions or the level of disturbance, confusion, uncertainty or lack of order that you may experience. This is done by restricting or limiting necessities which may affect your energy levels or emotional regulation such as food, water, sleep and shelter, doing certain actions or behaviors that may provoke fear, disturbance or confusion within you, isolating you so that you have no one to validate your experience or comfort you, using manipulation tactics such as denial, projection, blame shifting, gas lighting and a double bind so that they do not have to validate your experience which they can then use to further control you. A lot of this revolves around control and regulating their emotions. When you present yourself to them, when they have to witness your progress or success, your qualities, talents and positive traits, it triggers them to reflect on how they don't have that level of progress or success. They don't possess those qualities, talents or positive traits. When they have to witness you doing what you want to do, or living how you want to live, it triggers them to reflect on how they don't get to do what they want to do. They don't get to live how they want to live. This causes them to feel intense hatred, anger, envy and jealousy towards you. They become frustrated and resentful to release these emotions. They have to abuse you again and again, before they abuse you, they start thinking about it and it gives them a feeling of excitement or anticipation. And then when they finally do the action or behavior, they initially get a feeling of pleasure or reward. However the more they do it, the less pleasurable and rewarding the action or behavior becomes. They begin to feel empty and dissatisfied. They are left to reflect on their frustration, resentment and shame. This pushes them into an endless cycle where they are constantly repeating the same actions or behaviors, expecting a different result. When all it does is cause them to feel more and more frustration and resentment towards you. As in their minds, you are not able to give them the feeling that they desire or crave. But at the same time they need you, they are dependent on you like a drug. The more they repeat these behaviors, the more it reinforces and promotes a larger pattern of sadism or aggressive behavior within them. It becomes a part of their character and personality. It becomes a lifestyle as they sink deeper and deeper into addiction. Never getting out, years of their lives go by and at some point they might wake up and realize that they have just wasted their entire lives on pointless, meaningless actions or behaviors which resulted in nothing but wasted time. They never experience real life, real relationships, empathy, compassion, connection. By the time they realize it, they feel that it's too late for them to start working on those qualities now, they would rather take that red pill and go back into the matrix, never experiencing what life is really about. Thank you for watching, I hope this video resonated with you. Please like, comment, share and subscribe. If you would like to make a donation, my PayPal link is in the video description. Coaching Inquiries, you can email me at nags5coaching at gmail.com. Don't forget to check out the Nags5 merchandise store, we have some really cool designs on our t-shirts and mugs, the link is in the video description. Thank you for watching and I will talk to you soon.