Hello, so my name is Mark Lutter. I'm the founder and chairman of the Charter Cities Institute. Little bit about my background. I come from a distinguished line of bureaucrats. My dad worked for the FDA, which I know is a fan favorite here. My mom worked for the Pan-American and branch of the World Health Organization and in my kind of teenage rebellion and now middle-aged kind of adult rebellion, I decided to build better institutions. So I did my PhD at George Mason in economics and that's kind of informed my world view, thinking about what are the economic levers of governance, what leads to economic growth over the long term, and why that matters. And the kind of conclusion was Charter Cities, right? Governance matters. If a country is well-governed, it will tend to do relatively well. If a country is poorly governed, it will tend to do relatively poorly. The challenge often is how do you change government on a national level because you have a lot of special interest groups. Governments tend to be slow to reform. And so instead, we focus on how do you change it on a city level, right? So what is a Charter City? A Charter City is a new city with better laws. The city part is important because you need a sufficient number of people to have agglomeration, to have the benefits of living together, right? We heard some presentations earlier about building communities. And these communities tend to be much easier to build when you're already enmeshed in a large urban environment with amenities, with a number of people who might share those interests. Second is kind of the better laws, right? So think about a Charter City as kind of a supercharged special economic zone, right? Authority is delegated from the government to the zone that allows them to have easier building processes, a better business environment, perhaps better immigration rules that allow you to be more competitive on the city level. And this is multi-use, not just a single industry. So why are Charter Cities important? There are a rule for changing rules, right? Humanity has developed some good rules for governing ourselves, but there are probably better rules out there. And oftentimes, you don't want to implement these rules at a national level because you're not quite sure how they'll work. But if you implement them at a local level, for example, China, right? Their economic growth was driven by special economic zones and urbanization. The special economic zone started in Shenzhen. They pioneered labor markets, land markets, financial markets, and those spread throughout the rest of China. Once they could test those reforms within the Chinese system, they knew they would work. They'd spread that to other coastal cities, eventually throughout China. And that led to 10% annual growth for almost 40 years, leading China to be a global superpower today. So like generally framing that's gonna help accelerate growth in emerging markets, as well as kind of accelerate technological innovation in advanced economies. So how do we think about a history of the space? Right? We have Paul Romer, who's a Nobel laureate in economics currently at NYU. He gave a TED Talk in 2009 on Charter Cities. And his version of Charter Cities is a little bit different from the one that I advocate. But what he advocated was a high income country, for example, Canada, administer a city in a low income country, for example, Belize, right? Where the high income country has good institutions, they can sign a treaty with the lower income country and minister the city. This got a lot of pushback because a lot of low income countries thought, hey, this smells a bit like colonialism. He tried in Madagascar and then in Honduras. And actually the current legislation in a Honduras that Prospera and others are operating in is in part a descendant from Paul Romer's involvement in that country. At the same time, you had the seasteading movement, right? I think that seasteading institute launched in 2008, where Paul Romer focused primarily on how do you make poor countries thus poor? Seasteading focused on how do we accelerate technological innovation? How do we get the smartest people together? How do we kind of improve cutting edge institutions? And then what's happened recently is that kind of network states have emerged as an idea, as a concept. And one of the most interesting examples of this is this event, as well as Zuzalu, which Vitalik Buterin spoke at a few hours ago. And so I hope to organize the new cities and network states track at Zuzalu, but it demonstrated that's possible to bring together a few hundred people for several months that can seed new communities and eventually turn into new cities, right? It's demonstrated a function of demand aggregation to bring these communities together to help instantiate kind of the physical infrastructure that allows them to grow over time. So how do we think about charter cities today, right? There's several historic examples and a lot of this depends on how strictly or loosely you define charter cities. With a somewhat loose definition, you can include Singapore, Dubai, Shenzhen, Hong Kong. All of these are cities that have varying degrees of autonomy, right? Singapore is a separate country. Hong Kong was British. Then even under Chinese, there was one country, two system. Though in the last few years, that's kind of been collapsed a little bit with the passage of the national security law. You have Shenzhen, which is frequently called a special economic zone. However, when it was implemented, if you read some of the early legislation, they basically had a full set of rights, except for things like rail systems and post office. But beyond that, they could experiment with labor law, with land law, with all of these things that otherwise in China were effectively illegal to do. And then Dubai, right? It's part of the United Arab Emirates. And then they have a series of special economic zones of which the Dubai International Financial Center is one of the best known where they brought in common law judges to create a financial center that could compete with global financial centers, right? And if you think about current projects in Honduras, you have Prospero, which was presented earlier. You have Sulaimorazan, you have Praxis, which also presented earlier. Bravo Cities is my company. I'll talk about it a little bit at the end, still a little bit in stealth. You have Niyam, which is a very large Saudi New City project that the Saudi government has committed a half billion dollars to. They're focusing on, one, breathtaking infrastructure, and then two, on an improved legal environment to help attract businesses and residents to relocate there. So I founded the Charter Cities Institute about six years ago, and we're a nonprofit for building the ecosystem for Charter Cities. And so how do we think about this? One is building a city requires a population. And so thinking about where that population comes from, we see as critical to understanding what the dynamics of the city look like. Broadly defined, there are kind of two global migration patterns that can be tapped into for cities defined as hundreds of thousands to millions of residents. One is a global south to global north migration. Right, a lot of people wanna be in the US, wanna be in Europe. And two is a rural to urban migration in the global south. And so I started as a nonprofit because building a city has very long time horizons. There's a number of stakeholders involved. I attended a conference in Kazakhstan that was helping to plan a new city that had several distinguished urban planners from MIT. And they, for example, were unaware that zoning and land use increased housing prices. And so I realized that, one, there are new cities being built. And two, the advisors they are hiring for these new cities oftentimes had prestige but did not actually have a functional understanding of how the city's operated, how to sequence things, how to scale them into kind of a functional urban agglomeration, urban environment. Right, and so what do we do? The Charter Cities Institute, we do events. We're hosting an event in Rwanda in Kigali in about three weeks, bringing together a lot of the stakeholders in the Africa ecosystem where we focus. We do research thinking about, all right, what are the key ingredients that go into a new city? How do you partner with these different stakeholders? And then we lay out those partnerships, right? Who are the funders? How do you talk to governments? We don't see these as antagonistic to governments but a way for governments to really help achieve their aims. So let me run through this quickly. I'm running out of time here. One of the key challenges is right, where is land? If you wanna do a city, you need tens of thousands of acres of land. How do you amalgamate that land close enough to existing infrastructure that you can piggyback off the existing infrastructure? How do you work with governments? Most governments will have five or 10 year plans, right, where they will say we wanna create X number of housing units, Y number of jobs, Z number of schools, and then you frame your project as a solution to the challenges the governments are already concerned about. How do you finance the development, right? Different areas have different financial mechanisms for large infrastructure projects, but charters are effectively large infrastructure projects and you need to do that, all right? Spaces are validated when they get large exits, when they are able to achieve that. We heard from some of these early projects and we can see a lot of momentum in this room but I think catalyzing that momentum really kind of building it up requires projects that launch with tens of thousands of residents and hopefully in the next five years we can get there. So Bravo Cities, we're partnering with the Zanzibar government and a local developer. This is a render of the development in Zanzibar and we're basically taking a low friction strategy, right, the existing development has 600 units. It's 30 minutes south of Stone Town, the main city, 20 minutes south of the airport. We wanna build a knowledge center of East Africa, suck all the brains out of East Africa, put them in Fumba Peninsula, Fumba City, which is what we're building and the government has a special economic zone. We're partnering with them to improve the operations of that zone so we can expedite investment, attract more businesses, attract more companies, make sure the developers have the appropriate infrastructure to scale. And so lastly, if you wanna learn more, right, the website is CharterCitiesInstitute.org. Twitter, cci.city. My Twitter is at Mark Lutter, my email. We have the Charter Cities podcast, Africa's New Cities Summit. Feel free to find me later. Thank you very much for listening. Thank you.


Who owns the soul of the Democrat Party, the billionaire or the Bolshevik? Joining me now is my dear friend, president of the Mises Institute and former chief of staff to Congressman Ron Paul, Jeff Dice, Jeff, welcome here. So was Bernie essentially right when he said America has become a socialist country? You know I was gonna ask you that. He's not entirely wrong, judge. Let's face it, the Overton window has shifted a little bit. Socialism is not a dirty word on the left. It doesn't scare young people especially. A lot of young people in this country, when they hear socialism, they think of Denmark or Sweden or something like that. They don't think of Nazi Germany. They don't think of the Soviet Union. They don't think of communist China. So I think Bernie's right. I think in 2016 maybe Bernie was an outlier in his own party. In 2020, I think he's right there in the center or maybe Bloomberg's the outlier. But can Bernie actually make the argument that wealth should be redistributed or assets should be owned in common and isn't such an argument so antithetical to American values that the majority of the country would reject it out of hand? I know it sounded like Bloomberg last night but I think he made sense when he said that. Well I'd like to think so. I mean socialism is an incremental thing. We have all kinds of semi-socialism in the United States. All kinds of things are mostly owned and operated by the government. I mean there's whole industries like banking and medicine and law and education which are entirely wound up with government. So it's not something that the American people are scared of anymore but I do hope that what comes across in these democratic debates is that Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren for example, they hate business in their DNA. Capitalism then is anathema. Whereas Bloomberg, he doesn't hate it. He's a business guy. He understands what it took to become a wealthy person from nothing. So there is a difference there and I don't want to poop on it but I do think that Bernie Sanders is not an outlier. I think your average democratic voter is quite open to nationalizing or socializing entire industries and I think that people like you and I have to view this really as a failure of sorts. I mean we have failed intellectually, ideologically with our young people, the whole bulwark of conservatism ink and to a lesser extent libertarianism has failed to make the case that history and theory and book after book have proven time and time again which is that socialism doesn't work but some people are still buying it. If you take, we only have about 40 seconds Jeff, if you take the wealth transfer away from Bernie, doesn't he have a lot of views with which libertarians agree like war and peace and what you can do with your body and surveillance and civil liberties? Well supposedly he does. He doesn't seem like a civil libertarian when it comes to the police. He also apparently by some accounts cleaned up New York City quite a bit so it depends on your perspective but look, I want an Andy War candidate. I want to hear him talk about getting out of the Middle East. When he says that, maybe I'll believe him. Trump said the same thing. Okay, Jeff Dice, that's always a pleasure. Thank you very much for joining us.


The Catholic Church claims it provided $28 million worth of in-kind compensation to residential school survivors, but has repeatedly refused to say what that meant. CBC News has obtained an internal list of those Catholic claims. It includes support for drop-in centers or Indigenous student scholarships. But there are also millions in spending for things like sending nuns and priests to Northern communities or for Bible study groups. One academic says the church was focused on converting Indigenous people to Catholicism, not helping survivors to heal. In 2005, the church made three key promises to survivors totaling $79 million, but new documents obtained show that those promises were watered down. And in a separate court case last week in Saskatchewan, the CBC and the Globe and Mail succeeded in obtaining other files detailing the Catholic Church's two other promises to survivors. It promised to give its best efforts to fundraise $25 million and less than $4 million was raised. It also promised $29 million in cash, but also came up short after spending millions on lawyers and administration. It's for lawyers for unrelated work. $2.3 million allocated for administrative costs, $1.8 million loaned to the fundraising campaign, and $8.4 million deducted for amounts paid to survivors before this agreement. One survivor says that's not nearly enough considering the magnitude of the damage and the church's failure to keep its promises. A.J. Felix has waited years for answers from the Catholic Church. The truth is starting to come out. The truth is finally starting to come out.  Felix says he's glad this is all coming out. He says the church betrayed survivors. Because of the misery that we had, the hardships that we had, the violence that we experienced, and the sadness and the deaths, the suicides that we went through, the alcoholism that we went through, somebody has to be accountable. Felix is skeptical. He wonders if this will be just one more broken promise. For A.J. Felix, he says it's clear the church is still hiding the truth from survivors. And without the truth, he says there can be no reconciliation. The lawyer for these Catholic entities said no one was available for an interview. But in an email, he said that all of these in-kind services were approved by an independent committee. A best effort to fundraise $25 million in total, less than $4 million was raised. It also promised to pay $29 million to survivors but wasn't required to follow through. Finally, it promised $25 million worth of in-kind compensation, meant to be direct, practical support for survivors. Some was delivered in the form of addictions treatment or scholarships, but the church also included its expenses in conducting Bible study groups or sending priests and nuns to remote communities. As appeared to be some, well, to put it politely, some creative accounting, more importantly, not to fulfill the purpose and intent of the residential school settlement. In Manitoba, a Catholic priest has been banned from preaching and teaching publicly after accusing residential school survivors of lying about the abuse they faced. The statements were made at a Winnipeg church over weeks of services which were streamed online. Phil and priest Father Raelle Forêt told parishioners that survivors lied about sexual abuse to get more money from settlements and joked about shooting protesters who defaced churches. The archdiocese has issued an apology, disavowing the comments completely. The majority of residential schools were run by the Catholic Church, but it's the only one where top officials haven't apologized for its role. And today experts say some Catholic organizations are obstructing efforts to find and mark burials and identify children by withholding thousands of historical records. First Nations leaders hope an investigation will now be launched. Obviously, you know, we hope that there is some type of investigation and right away. Do it now, like don't wait six months and try to find every excuse in a book to delay or colon an investigation. There is a responsibility that lies squarely on the shoulders of the Council of Bishops in Canada. Some feel it should rest even higher. One of the Truth and Reconciliation Commissions calls to action a papal apology never offered.


From Hollywood, the Hollywood Radio Theater. Virginia Mayo, Dana Andrews, and Robert Cummings in Strangers on a Train. Ladies and gentlemen, your producer, Mr. Irving Cummings. Greetings from Hollywood, ladies and gentlemen. There is no question that travel is an excellent way to pick a bet. But I doubt that anyone would wish to experience a state-born meeting in the nice place Strangers on a Train. And as our stars, we have that sensitive actor, Dana Andrews, glamorous Virginia Mayo, and in an unusual role, talented Robert Cummings. An excellent way to bring this engrossing Warner Bros. screen here. It was directed by that master of suspense, Alfred Gidcock. Now act one of Strangers on a Train. While in Robert Cummings' Bruno Anthony, Dana Andrews' Guy Haynes, and Virginia Mayo's Anne Morton. A few moments ago, an offbound train left Washington, D.C. Among the passengers settling down in the club car are two young men. I beg your pardon.  That's right. Well, I'm quite a tennis fan. I saw your match last season in South Orange against Faraday. No, I was one of my lucky days. Oh, I certainly do admire people who do things. Oh, by the way, my name's Anthony. Bruno Anthony? I don't know. Well, I guess you want to get back to your book and read something. Go right ahead. So, you know, it must be pretty exciting to be so important. Well, a tennis player isn't so important. All the people who do things are important. Now, me, I never seem to do anything. I suppose you're going to Southampton for the double, huh? You're reading the sport page, aren't you? Yeah, I wish I could be there to watch you. But I've got to be back in Washington tomorrow. Uh, cigarette? Not nothing. You don't have to have a match, do you? Beer? Oh, thanks. Well, well, an elegant light. In grave two, A to G. I'll, uh, bet I can guess who A is. Ann. Ann Morton. Oh, wait a minute. It's simple. You see, sometimes I turn the sports pages and look at the society section. Congratulations. That is the Morton's daughter. You're quite a reader, Mr. Anthony. Yes, yes, I am. Ask me anything. I got the answer. Even about people I don't even know. Like, um, like who would like to marry whom when his wife gets divorced? Maybe you read too much. Oh, there I go again. I meet somebody I like and admire so much, and I, I say the wrong thing. Don't forget it. I guess I'm just a little jittery. Uh, when's the wedding? What? Like you and Ann Morton. The wedding, it was in the paper. But it couldn't have been. Let's say legalized, bigamy. Ha, ha, ha. It's wonderful, you know, having your company all the way to New York. As a matter of fact, I'm getting off at Metcalfe. Metcalfe? Who'd want to stop at Metcalfe? Well, it's my hometown. Oh, oh, I guess. A little chat with your wife about the divorce? Well, how about having lunch in my compartment? Well, thanks, but I think I'll go to the dining hall. No, no seats there for about 20 minutes. Well, uh, how about lunch in my compartment? Ha, ha, ha, wouldn't think of it. Come along, Mr. Hayes. Oh, say, this is a real pleasure. And so, also, I went to three different colleges. I sticked out his time drinking and gambling. All right, so I'm a bummer. Who said you were? My father. He hates me. With all the money he's got, he thinks I ought to plunge his plans like somewhere and work my way out. Well, I mean, possibly he's got...   I want to kill him. No, I don't think you know what you want. Well, I want to do something and everything.  Have you ever driven a car blindfolded at a hundred and fifty miles an hour? Well, no, not lately. Well, I did. I flew in a jet plane, too. Man, what a thrill. I almost blew the sod out of my head. What are you trying to prove, anyway?   You're smart. It's all you. Wonderful chemistry. On top of that, you've got a swell job. Assistant tour of the United States senator. On top of that, you're going to marry the boss's daughter. Well, that makes a nice shortcut to a career, doesn't it? Marrying the senator's daughter has nothing to do with it. Take it easy, guy. I'm your friend, remember?  I'd do anything for you. We'll be sobbing soon. I've got to change things. Oh, yes, that's right. Let's have it. What did you say her name was? Your wife? Miriam. Miriam.  Give it, Bruno. Okay. Say, you want to hear one of my ideas for a perfect murder? Murder? Isn't that against the law? What's the life of two? Some people are better off dead anyway. Someone like your wife and my father, for instance. Now, let's say that you'd like to get rid of your wife. That's, you know, quite as there's a humor with her. No, no, no, no, I'm serious.  Because you'd be caught. Now, here is my idea. I'm afraid I don't have time to listen to you, Bruno. But it's so simple. Look, two colors meet.  Now, there's no connection between them at all. We've never even seen each other before. Now, each one has something that he'd like to get rid of. So they swap murders. Swap murders? Yeah. Each fellow does the other fellow's murder. And then there's nothing to connect them to. Each one is murdered a total stranger. Like you do my murder and I do yours. And we're coming into my station now. Yeah, for example, your wife and my father, Chris Cross. Well, thanks for the lunch, Bruno. Well, I'm glad you enjoyed it. And you think my theory is okay, huh, guy? You like me? Sure. Sure, you've got some great ideas. Nice meeting you, Bruno. Yeah, good luck at your family, guy. You bet. I've got some great ideas. Oh, hey, guy, you're lighter. You forgot to take a red light. It's amazing you. Well, I'll send it to her sometime. Yeah, I must send it to her sometime. I hope you don't mind meeting in the park, guy. Oh, Miriam, not at all. This is fine. I couldn't very well meet you in the store, could I? I need to take my lunch hour later. Oh, you're looking well, Miriam. So are you. You got a nice tan playing tennis with all your rich friends. When can we see your lawyer? What's your hurry, guy? My hurry?  Well, you wouldn't give me the divorce right away. I tried to hope it was because you were a little bit jealous. I got over being jealous. Long time, my little Miriam. You know, I didn't get a handsomeer than ever. It's pretty late now to start fighting with a discarded husband. Let's see your lawyer and get the thing over with. Would you bring the money? Lawyers are expensive. And there's dental over there. Thanks. You know, if I'd known this would start doing so well, I wouldn't have run out on you. What are you trying to say, Miriam? I got a big surprise for you. I'm not getting a divorce. But it's what you wanted. What have you been harping about for over a year now? It's a woman's privilege to change her mind. It's not inviting to the court. I wouldn't want you to be ashamed of me and Washington. What's that supposed to mean? Don't look so mad.  Especially when Anne Morton is hanging on your arm. Let's not talk about Anne Morton.  Take a real pretty story, wouldn't it? But Senator's daughter all involved with a married man. What's happened, Miriam?  No man runs out on me, guy, not even you. So I think it over. I never want to see her here with you again. I'm warning you, Miriam. Either we go ahead with this divorce or I don't. I'll wait that time to lose things here, but I gotta get back to work. I'll see you in Lorsingen in two weeks. Hello? Hello operator. Hello darling. Where are you? I'm in Metcats. Guy, did everything go all right? No. Everything went all wrong. She doesn't want the divorce. It's unbelievable. I mean, after all these months. But what did she say? Did it make any difference what she said? I'm sorry, Anne. I feel so... Yes, darling, I know how you must feel, but you sound so savage, Guy. I'd like to break her neck.  I just know you're talking like that, dear. I know. I suppose I'd try to see her again, but I gotta get to Southampton. My plane leaves here in a few minutes. Don't worry, darling. We waited this long. We can wait a little longer. I don't know what I'd do without you. I love you, Guy. Well, I've got to rush now, dear. I might think something. I'll see you on Thursday. Yeah, sure. Good luck, darling. Guy, this is Bruno. How are you, Guy? Who? What did you say this is? Bruno, Bruno Antony. Don't you remember on the plane?  I would have called you sooner, but the operator had a little trouble finding you in Southampton. Would you mind telling me why you're phoning? Well, how will the match is going, Guy? I don't play till the morning. Oh, Guy, about your visit in Metcalf. Are you getting a divorce? No, no, wait a minute, Bruno. You won't give it to you, right? Miriam won't give you a divorce. No. He'll double-cross you. Are you going to see her again? I'll let Bruno know. Why don't you just... I've told you I liked your guy. I'm your friend. You should never forget that. You just leave Miriam to me. What are you talking about? You'll find out, Guy. Just be patient, that's all. You just be patient. I don't care what Bruno's doing. I better want to talk to him. If you're talking about me, Father, I had to call a friend of mine long distance. Really, Tom? Must you always take this tone with Miriam? It's all right, Mother. I'm used to his tone by now. You can wipe that injured look off your face right now. You were out last night, weren't you? I'm a big boy, Father. I go out at night all the time. You had another accident. You had another car. Oh, really? Now it's hit-and-run driving. And you knew about it all the time. But this was a parked car. No one would get it. Why don't you tell that to the police? They... They don't do anything to bring me home. This was the last time you looked to help me. I'll never lift a finger for him again. It's all right, Mother. It's none of your business. You know I can't stand it, so you cry. Is there anything else you want to say to me, Father? Yes. Get out of my sight.  Bruno, where are you going? Just a bit, Mother. Something for a friend of mine. You just don't understand me, darling. What's he going to do next? Tell me. What's he going to do next? Nothing. Nothing at all. He's not normal. If it's the last thing I do, I'm going to have that boy taken care of. If necessary, put under restraint. I'll never believe it. Never, never.  Things like this just can't go on. Guy? Uh, over here, Guy. Well, hello. Who's that? Bruno? Yeah, that's right, Guy. How are you? Well, what are you doing here? And at this time of night, I was waiting for you to get back to Washington. I thought of meeting you at the station, but then I figured this might be better here in front of your apartment. Now, look, it's one o'clock at night, and I'm sorry. You don't seem very pleased. See me, Guy. Would you mind telling me what this is all about? I, uh, I've just come back from Mexico, Guy. I bought you a present. See? They're glasses. Didn't tell me that Miriam wore glasses. She, she's Miriam. It was very quick, Guy. She wasn't hurt any. It was all over, no time. What are you trying to tell me? I knew you'd be surprised. And there's nothing for us to worry about, either. Nobody saw us, only Miriam. And I was very careful, Guy.  Cigarette lighter. What do you mean? Maniac of a guy. We planned it on this train together. You wanted it, remember? Where you going? What do you think I'm going?  But you can't, Guy. We both be arrested for murder. You're in this just as much as I am. We planned it together.  You think you can get away with that? Oh, come now, Guy.   I didn't even know the girl. But you're going to the police now while you're just returning yourself in as an accessory. You see, you had the motive. Are you doing... Now, listen, let me tell you about my father. I've done my part now, and you'll do yours. I've got the plan of the house here all drawn up.  Get away from me. It's where I give you the same thing you gave Miriam. Oh, you're not yourself, Guy. Now, when you think things over, you'll see that I'm right. Tomorrow, I don't know you. I never saw you before, and I never wanted to see you again. You're lighter, Guy. The one you gave Ann. You left it on the train. Did she miss it? Give that to me, Bruno. Give me that lighter. I don't have it, Guy. That is, I don't have it with me, you see. Well, as I said, we can arrange everything tomorrow. Well, I'm sorry, darling, but I just got in. Of course I'm all right, but you sound upset. Is there anything wrong? All right, darling, I'll come over right away. Thanks for coming over, darling. Ann, Ann, what is it? You're trembling. I wonder if you know how much I love you. Come along, Guy. Father and Barbara, they're waiting in the library. I thought we'd nicely alone, Guy, but Ann insisted and so did Barbara. Now really, Daddy, if I'm going to be Guy's sister-in-law, then at least I can do it. But don't, Barbara, keep quiet. Guy, we wouldn't have called you with this hour if it weren't important. It's about your wife, Miriam. What about it, then? I'm sorry to be the one to tell you. She's been killed, Guy. You're the... The police have been trying to locate you everywhere. You're to call headquarters in Metcalfe. Miriam. Murdered. Tonight, about nine o'clock, she... she was strangled. Twenty minutes ago on the street corner, Guy Haynes listened to Bruno Anthony tell an incredible story of how he had murdered Guy's wife. Now in Senator Morton's home, Guy learns that Bruno's fantastic report is completely true. It's happened in an amusement park, Guy. Some sort of lover's lane, I believe. She'd gone there, apparently, with some other people. Two of the young men found her. It was done by someone else. They don't even have a suspect, Guy. Except you, probably. Barbara, I wish you'd keep quiet. But the police will say that Guy wanted Miriam out of the way so he could marry Anne. She's right, Senator. But if you've got an alibi, you have nothing to worry about. You can tell them where you were. At about nine o'clock tonight. I was on my way here. I was on the train. Well, there you are. Who saw you? Did you speak to anyone? You need a witness? Yes. Yes, I did speak to someone. He was the only other passenger in the club car. Someone you know? No, I didn't know. I mean, he said his name was Collier Collins or something like that. He said he was a professor at Delaware Tech. He had been drinking. Drinking? Yes, he'd been to some meeting and had a couple of drinks. Well, if he was on the train, he saw you. Then everything is all right. You'll still have to answer some questions. It's a dreadful business. Poor unfortunate girl. Miriam was rotten. She was a human being. Father's getting late. Guy looks so tired. Of course. Well, you two, now you can be married right away. Think of this. You're free. You won't forget to phone the Metcalfe police guy. Captain Silly. Yes, sir. Good night, Senator. Good night. Good night, Barbara. I still think it would be wonderful to have a man love you so much he'd kill for you. I kept saying over and over again I was being silly, Guy, there was one horrible moment tonight when the news came through. I kept remembering what you said on the phone from Metcalfe after you'd seen her. Right. And I could break that neck. No, don't even sad. Forget you ever said it. And there was something even more terrifying than the murder itself.  Anything to do with it. We'd be separated, perhaps forever. I couldn't stand that, Guy. I couldn't bear it. And you don't think that I... Oh, darling, no, no, of course not. Just hold me, Guy. Just hold me. It's entirely, Mr. Haynes.  I'm just as anxious as you are, Captain. Well, we've managed to locate the gentleman you spoke with on the train. Well, Professor, this is Mr. Haynes. I can't tell you how foolish I feel, Captain. I really don't remember meeting this gentleman. You don't remember? But you were just a moment, Mr. Haynes. Unfortunately, I remember very little of my trip.  I'm not a drinking man. Well, just one or two drinks. But we were sitting right opposite each other. You were going over some speech you made about calculus, mathematics or something. I'm very sorry, Mr. Haynes. I certainly must have been celebrating. If you'll wait outside, Professor. Is it so important whether you remember me or not? Surely the important thing is I've been able to name one man who was on that train with me. You've been able to find him. Isn't that proof enough that I was there last night? Yes, I'd say you were in the clear. But there is a little more checking I'd like to do. But if I'm in the clear, would you... Take care of these things, Mr. Haynes. You're free to go back to Washington right now. Thank you, Captain. Then the police verified his alibi father and said he could go. Isn't that about his fear? Yes, except that when an alibi is full of scotch, cast a little doubt. Then the professor was boiled. He didn't remember me at all, Barbara. But you knew he was on the train. Wasn't that enough to prove that's where you were? I wish I knew. For sure, I mean. Full with everything's all right and the police are just being curled. What's your next move, Guy? Whatever it is the police will know all about it. Let's take a look out the window. By a guardian angel. Like Guy, you'll be killed. That is Detective Leslie Henneth Day. He works 16 hours a day and somebody named Hammond takes over for the next eight. As a matter of fact, Henneth Day seems like a very nice fellow. For your own peace of mind, Guy, perhaps... Well, perhaps if you worked here at the house for the next few days, well, it would be less embarrassing for you. It would be less embarrassing for you and the terror if I resigned as your assistant.  Of course it is. Besides, don't you have to play in the tennis tournament? I'm withdrawing from that, Barbara. But wouldn't it look awkward if you suddenly cancelled all your plans? Father's right, Guy. You've got to go on as though nothing had happened. It's guarded by Mr. Henneth Day. I beg your pardon? What is it, Leslie? It's telephone from Mr. Haines, Miss. They say it's urgent. You can take it right over there, Guy. Oh, yes. Hello? Hello, Guy? This is Bruno. I was hoping you'd call me before I... What's the matter? Boy, it must have been some mistake. It wasn't for me. I'm learning more and more things about you, Guy. I never dreamed you were so interested in painting. I feel a very warm attachment for this art gallery. For the first time all week, we've actually been alone for an hour. By the way, where's Henneth Day? Oh, he's waiting out front. Hadn't we better be leaving? Yes, I suppose so. I wonder if we'll ever... Hi. Do you have a minute, Guy? Come on, we'll get Henneth in time to cab. But that man, he's calling you, Guy. Oh. Excuse me, dear. I'll see what he wants. I'm sorry to have to follow you here, Guy. Will you stop pestering me? You never even answered my note. I'm at the time you're who now? You're calling everything. You're making me come out in the open. Why didn't you call me? My father's leaving for Florida next week. There's not much time. I'm the detective outside. He'll see us together. Isn't that Ann Morton you're with? Slight improvement over Miriam, huh, Guy?  Who is he, Guy? No, just some tennis fan. I never saw him before. So that's Toney. Toney? I mean, I saw him yesterday. Where? He was at the tennis club watching you practice. Oh. He was sitting with Smith and Mrs. Darville. He must be very amusing. Who are the Darvills? Well, he's connected with a French embassy. We'll meet them tomorrow night, darling. They'll be at the party. Oh, yes. About that party, Ann. Do you really think I should be there? But I thought we settled that, dear. Of course you should be there. He's watching us, Guy, that man. Come along, dear. Let's go home. That young Frenchman with the Darvills. Oh, he's not French, Daddy. They just introduced me to him. His name's Anthony. Bruno Anthony. Does he look interesting? Why is he looking at you? Daddy, not so loud. He's coming over here. Oh, uh, this is my father, Mr. Anthony. Oh, I'm delighted to meet you, Senator. Uh, how do you do? Yes, sir. It's a wonderful party, sir. You know, sometime I'd like to talk to you about my idea for harnessing the life force. It'll make atomic power look like a horse and buggy. Well, I'm sure. I'm already developing my faculty to see millions of miles. Senator, can you imagine being able to smell a flower on the planet Mars? Well, I'd like to have lunch with you someday soon, sir, and tell you more about it. I'll see you later, won't I? That'll be fine. Later, sir, yes. I still don't remember inviting that young man. I told you, Daddy. The Darvills just brought him along. Just a minute, Barbara. What are your glasses? My glasses? You're supposed to wear glasses, Bob. Oh, but, Daddy, even at parties... Not another word. Get your glasses and put them on. You're concerned about Guy? If the Darvills brought him, well, what difference does it make? He shouldn't be here. But you said you don't even know him. Well, I just don't like his look. I don't like the way he keeps tearing his Barbara here. I'm not so sure I blame him. Barbara's very cute, especially when she wears glasses. Daddy seems to be talking to Judge Donoghue right now. Judge Donoghue? There's something else I'd like to ask you, Judge Donoghue. After you've sentenced the man to the chair, isn't it rather difficult to go out and just eat your dinner right away? Oh, really, young man? Well, when a murderer has been convicted, he must be sentenced. When he is sentenced to death, he must be executed. Oh, it's quite impersonal, isn't it? Well, besides, it doesn't happen every day. So few murderers are caught. If you don't mind, I believe I'm being paid. Well, Mr. Landon, you seem very interested in the subject of murder. No, no more than anyone else, no more than you, for instance. Me? Oh, I'm not interested in murder. Oh, come now, everyone's interested. Are you sure you're not going to tell me that there hasn't been a time that you didn't want to dispose of someone? It is no.  And then what did you say? Well...   How would you plan to do it? I didn't get your name. Mrs. Cunningham. Well, Mrs. Cunningham, come on, how would you do it? Well, um, I suppose I'd have to take a gun from somewhere. Oh, no, Mrs. Cunningham, no, bang, bang, bang, all over the place. Blood everywhere, all over the place. Well, um, how about a little poison? A poison, yes, yes, poison, that's better, Mrs. Cunningham, but poison could take anywhere from ten to twelve weeks. That is, if you wanted to be careful. If poor Mr. Cunningham is going to die from natural causes. Well, um, what's your idea, Mr. Anthony? I have the best way and the best tool. My two hands. Yes, it is simple, silent, very quick. Oh, why of course. Oh, you must be very strong, Mr. Anthony. Yeah, let me just show you what I mean. Yes. You don't mind if I borrow your neck for a moment, do you? Oh, Mrs. Cunningham, this is so silly. Very well then, and go ahead. Yes, now, now just watch what I'm doing. Now, when I nod my head, you just try to cry out. I bet you won't be able to make a sound. I'm letting. All right, now just relax. Just wait till I nod my head. She'll be all right, Father. Mrs. Anthony's with her and Judge Donahue. They're up in the bedroom. What happened? How could he have joked her? I don't know for sure. Mrs. Anderson thinks they were playing some sort of game. Then when Desi screams, she just stares. Now where is he at? Now where's Anthony? A guy took him in as a stutter. Then tell Guy to get him out of here as soon as he can. This is a nice item for the customer. Well, uh, I'd better get back to the kids. Oh, Anne. Oh, Anne. Barbara, what's the matter? She was awful. I saw her. What was he trying to do to her? You saw him? I was standing in the doorway. His hands were on her shoulder. He kept staring at me. Anne, he was strangling me. What do you mean? He thought he was murdering me. Don't be silly, dear. You're upset, that's all right. Now go find Father. Come on... What happened, Guy? I saved it, didn't I? I started getting so... so dizzy. It was mad, crazy mania. You ought to be locked up. Will you get out of here now, and let me alone?  I mean, we've got to talk about my father. You promised to pick him. Now, you shouldn't have done that, Guy. You shouldn't have hit him.  Do you have a car here? Yeah. It's just outside. Down the block. Come on. We'll go out the back here. Guy? Did he leave? Oh. And? I didn't mean to startle you, dear. He has left? Yes. And? Why did you come out here? I had to talk to you. Guy, yesterday at the art gallery. That wasn't the first time you'd met Bruno, was it? What makes you say that? I don't know. Guy, what did Miriam look like? Like, I'm told you. I wanted to tell me again. Well, she was dark, not too tall. That was pretty. What else? What else is there? She wore glasses, didn't she? Yes. Barbara wears glasses too. And Barbara looks something like Miriam, doesn't she? No. Doesn't she? No. No, not at all. How did you get him to do it, Guy? I get him to do it. Bruno Anthony killed Miriam, didn't he? Tell me, didn't he? Yes, I am. He's now the maniac. I met him on the train going to Metcalfe. He had some crazy scheme about exchanging murders. If I do his murder, he'd do mine.  Well, he'd read about me in the papers. He knew about Miriam, he knew about you. Oh, you must have known he was talking nonsense. But he wasn't. Of course, I didn't give it another thought. And now a lunatic wants me to kill his father. It's too fantastic. You mean you've known about Miriam all this time? It's the first night. He showed me her glasses. Well, why don't you call the police? And have them say what you just did. Mr. Haynes, how did you get him to do it? Then Bruno would say that we planned it together. We'd better get back before Hennessy starts looking for you. Now, do you see, Anne? This is why I didn't want you to know anything about it. Now, what does it protect all of you, Barbara and your father? Now that you know, you're acting guilty, too. Guy, what are we going to do? I don't know. I don't know. This is Guy. I've decided to do what you want about your father. Yes, I want to get it over with. Detective, don't worry about Hennessy. There's a way out across the roof here to the next apartment. Does anyone know you've come home?  All right. I'll be there in 40 minutes. Guy Haynes, there's only one way out. Now in the quiet of the night, Guy's entered the Anthony home with the key on the map of the house that Bruno sent him. Guy has no trouble finding the bedroom. Mr. Anthony. Mr. Anthony. Don't be alarmed, but I've got to talk to you about your son. About Bruno, Mr. Anthony. Wouldn't you feel more at home with the light on, Guy? Bruno. My father isn't home, Guy. I was about to tell you that over the phone, but you made such a quick decision. I wondered why. I thought your father would be interested to know he has a lunatic for a son. And you have no intention of going ahead with our little arrangement? I never had.  I don't know much about these things, but why don't you go where you can get some kind of treatment? Not only for your own sake, but you can't go on just calling more and more. I don't like to be double-crossed, Guy. I have a murder on my conscience. I killed your wife. But it's not just my murder. It's yours, too, isn't it? I guess there's no use trying to talk to you, Bruno. I'll leave now. Yes. There's that man from the police who's supposed to be watching you. You mustn't let him get suspicious, Guy. You can put that gun away, Bruno. Well, don't worry.  It might disturb my mother. I have a very clever fellow. I'll pick up something much better than that. Good night, Guy. Where did he go, Hennessy? Where did Haines go? That's a good easy, Ham. And if I know where he went, I wouldn't be waiting here for you to relieve me. I didn't even know he gave me the slip until I heard his farm ringing. Well? Nothing keeps ringing for ten minutes. Nobody sleeps that sound, so I woke up the janitor and let me in. No Haines. We'll probably hear of another dame murdered. Well, go back to the office and put in a call on Metcalf Captain's serving. I think this calls for more questioning in this dame. Questioning? Let's take him in. Oh, look, you're a good cop, Hamman. But how many times do I got to tell you we don't have a thing on Haines? There's no evidence that he was even in Metcalf when his wife wasn't killed. So we just let him come back here and go to bed, huh? That's right, Hamman. We just waited out. And no one knows I've come here, Mrs. Anthony. But I simply had to talk to you. Oh, Miss Morton, really. I know Bruno's been in some very awkward greats, but nothing so ridiculous is a murder. But you have to make him do something about this. Don't you see that just one word from him will get Guy out of this dreadful situation. Oh, oh, oh. How can you take this so seriously? It's just some practical joke, dear. Bruno's so terribly irresponsible you don't seem to understand. Your son is responsible for this.  Did Bruno tell you this? No, of course not, but I... Well, there you are. Well, now, it's very nice of you to call, Miss Morton. Do come and see us again sometime, won't you? I'm afraid the mother wasn't very much of help, was she? If you don't mind, I think I'd better leave. Mother hasn't been too well for some time. She's a little house-like and confused. You know, I'm very upset with Guy. He shouldn't have sent you. Guy doesn't know I'm here, Mr. Anthony. He's at the tennis club, isn't he? He will be. He has a playing renaissance and a very important match. Oh, but he must be very desperate to try to involve me. Try to involve you? Well, I've been protecting Guy ever since he told me how much he hated his wife. Do you know, Miss Morton, that Guy tried to get me to go back to that amusement park some night after dark to look for his cigarette lighter? What's his cigarette lighter got to do with this? Why, he dropped it there. Right after he... Well, right... You see, all the police are waiting for is just one piece of evidence to convict Guy for the murder. I can't tell you how worried I am. Please, stop! Oh, Miss Morton, I do sympathize with you, but I just couldn't do what he asked. Why, that would make me inaccessible. Then I left his house and came straight into the club, Guy. You shouldn't have gone there, darling. Bruno told me if the police ever found your lighter there, that's all they need. Something to prove you were there when she was murdered. Bruno has my lighter. I know, you told me. That lie about wanting him to get it back. That means that he's going back to Metcalf, back to the amusement park. He's going to drop it there, somewhere where they'll be sure and find it. Oh, Guy, I wanted so much to help, but I'm afraid all I did is make things worse. He said last night he'd think of something. Give him credit, he certainly has. Well, you've got to get to Metcalf before he does. You haven't time to play, you'd better tell him now. No, if I try to avoid this match, Henness is bound to get suspicious. I haven't been out of his sight all day. Then I'll go. There's a train in an hour. No, you stay here. I'll try to give Henness a flip right after the match. But darling, that'll be too late. Didn't Bruno say I wanted him to go there some night after dark? Yes. You want to expose himself in a day life? If I can finish off this match, I'll still have time. All righty, Guy, go on in a couple of minutes. I'll be right there. I'm looking. Let's see what you better do. Get hold of Barbara. I just... One thing, Hammond, the same celebration, but it could be innocent, I think. I looked, Hennessy. If Captain Turley said, pick him up for questioning, let's pick him up. No, let's let him have his chance. If the boys hear about this, they'll send us orchids. Oh, no! Isn't he wonderful, Mr. Hennessy? Oh, wow. How are you, Barbara? Oh, this is Mr. Hammond. Mr. Hammond, this is a friend of his other daughter. Hi. Oh, yes, I've seen Mr. Hammond outside the house. He's a detective, too. You and him, they turn, don't you? Yeah, something like that. But if he's your elite man, why would the two of you be together?  Now watch him hit the little ball, and don't have too many questions.  The cab's outside waiting to take Guy to the station. I gave him $10. What about those two detectives? Well, they're still over there in the dressing room, waiting for Guy to send him to the match. Gosh, I've never seen Guy play so fast in my life. He's got to get on that train. Barbara, now, once again, as soon as the match is over, Guy's going to run out through the clubhouse. Just do your best to delay those two detectives from coming after him. All Guy will need is a few seconds. He'll just need it to me, Anne. Oh, I'm real good at getting him to... Looks like we're out of luck, Anne, when Haines beat us to it by about two minutes. Guy said he bought a ticket to Metcalf. What are we waiting for? If the train just pulled out, we can still have him flag it down. Relax. Let him go to Metcalf. We'll phone Captain Shirley and let them take over at that end. All right, nutty little day. Barbara's a nice kid, maybe it was an accident. Pushing you in the fish pond? Just one thing at a time. What's Haines' big rush to get back to Metcalf? What's he going back for? Come on, Hennessey. Let's phone Charlie. What time does it get dark, I said? Hang around, bud. Hang around. You'll find out what's happening. They sure are doing business down at this end of the park. All right? Oh, day and night. Ever since that girl got murdered, she's been doing business down at this end of the park. All right? Oh, day and night. Ever since that girl got murdered, people want to see the scene of the crime. Oh. Well, where did it happen? Right over there. Them picnic grounds across the lagoon. Lovers' lanes. Yes, sir. They sure have been cleaning up. I don't think it's a very nice way to make money. Man, these folks got eaten too, ain't they? For a while, the smoochers wouldn't go near the place. I'm afraid I don't know what a smoocher is. Okay, so I ain't educated. No, I'm not. No, I'm not. I ain't educated. Wait a minute, mister. You got a match? No. Well, you've got a lighter. You keep fooling with that lighter. Here. Buy yourself a box of matches. Character. The place is full of characters. Hello, this is Sergeant Adams. Phone him from the station. Put Captain Kelly on the phone. Oh, well, he just got off the train, so he took the cab, told the driver to take him to the amusement park. We'll be waiting for him. All right, that's all, Adam. You shouldn't have come here, Guy. This could be very dangerous for you. It would be more dangerous if I left you here alone, wouldn't it, Bruno? This is where it happened, Guy. This is really where it happened. They try to make people believe it happened nearer the concessions. They figured they'll make more money that way. I came after my cigarette lighter. I want that lighter, Bruno. Don't be foolish, Guy. You're just proving a theory for them. The murderer returning to the team... You better get away. You better get away. Hey, where are you at? I got the man you want, right here. Stop him. Stop him. You get away. Don't think I'm on him. Hey, where'd you go? He's getting your way. I can't get him. Let him get away. Just watch your fire. There are too many people. Keep those people back. Captain Kelly, this man here, he so pains us in the one we want. It's the other one, the one who ran. What do you mean, it isn't him? I remembered him. It was the night when the girl was killed. Two young fellows were with her. And this one, he kept following her. He kept looking at her. I remember her saying... You realize what you're saying? I was talking to him before. I asked him for a match. It's the same one.  Over here, Captain. Over here. How many closer? Well, you're on through now, Bruno. They're all around here. The police. They won't get me. I'll climb to the top. I'll jump before they take me alive. You're sick, Bruno. You belong in a hospital. They know about that. You don't care about me. You don't care what they do to me. Get down from there. The cars are coming. They won't come down. I'll jump before they take me alive. What's this all about? He had my cigarette lighter. He came back here tonight to plant it. He spent the whole thing on me. Cigarette lighter, huh? Let me talk to him, please. Take it easy now. Over here. He's in a pretty bad way, Captain. So can't you lift that stuff off of him? They've done everything we can until the crane comes. Hello, guy. Who's that with you? This is Captain Telly, Bruno. Please. Well, he gots it last. Now, guy, tell him, Bruno. Tell him you have my lighter. Oh, but I haven't got it, guy. It must still be over there. Where you dropped it that night. He dropped it, huh? I'm sorry, guy. I want to help you. Well, I don't know what I can... Telly, can I go through his pocket? No, of course you can't. Besides, he said he hasn't got it. But if he dies before he can... There's no more of it. This man is dead, Captain. On his hand. He's got something in his hand. See what it is, Max. It's a lighter, Captain. A cigarette lighter. Yeah, let me see that. From A to G. Yeah, from A to D. Looks like you were right, Vane. Well, I better keep this for a while. How about staying in town overnight? I imagine there's a lot you may want to tell me, huh? Yeah, I imagine there is. Captain, may I use the telephone? Yeah, sure. There's one up near the entrance. Say, who was he, mister? That guy. His name was Bruno Antony. A very clever fellow. Oh, yes, guy. Yes, darling. And thanks for phoning. Well, of course I'll be there. I'll leave right away. Barbra. Barbra. It was Guy. That man across the aisle. He keeps looking at you. Oh? He's a minister. I didn't know you knew any ministers. I beg your pardon, but aren't you Guy Hame? I'm very sorry, sir. But when I was a very little boy, my mother warned me. He never just speaks to strangers on a train.


Hey guys, it's Nate, aka The Foot Accountant. Welcome back to the channel. Happy Monday. It is time for a market outlook. We're going to take a look at FIFA 20 Ultimate Team this week. What kind of content could we be getting? And there's a big time question mark this week. I don't know what kind of content we're going to get this week. Technically, we are inside of the Foot Player Days promo still, which is interesting because we haven't gotten anything. The second half of this is actually a two week promo. There really hasn't been anything going on. There's no cards that are in packs right now. We have icon swap set three, new season objectives, and we've been getting a couple of squad building challenges. But other than that, the main thing people are doing right now is this icon swap set three. That's what people are doing in foot right now. I myself am doing some icon swaps. I'm trying to get that nine token allotment where I can go and open the icon pack. By the way, if you guys have those, I would love to open them. Tuesday, kind of like 12 p.m. 12 p.m. 1 a.m. UK time is technically when I'm streaming. It's like evening time for me in the U.S. Twitch.tv backslash the foot account and I'll open those on a live stream. If you guys would like me to just a shout out for that. If that's something that you're interested in. But this week, man, I really don't feel like there's going to be a ton of stuff happening on the game this week. We've been getting decent SBCs almost like one per day. On Sunday, we got this in the spotlight. One day, rare gold pack SBC, which is solid. And then we had some updates to some more of the SBCs back here. Some of these got upgraded. I forget which ones it was. Was it MLS, one of them? We had a third player added for some of these SBCs back here. I forget who it was. This one's already had Verity. Was it the Saudi League? OK, the Saudi League was one of them. I think the SUSA CDM card is a new one. Some of these some of these look pretty awesome.  High rated, I think the I don't know which one. I honestly boys don't pay a lot of attention to these. I don't know if that cruise is new. Didn't look like it's new. I think the other guy was new. But we had some new guys added Murphy as a left mid 88 rated. So again, these are high rated SBC cards. You can get Musanna. I think Musanna is new. That's a solid card to a lot of these league SBC cards that they're putting out are decently solid. So that is some of the content that we got on Sunday info, which wasn't a ton. But basically what they've been doing is they've just been dropping player SBCs right now. And I honestly think EA is just kind of in like scramble mode. I think they're trying to figure out what they want to do with weak and league rewards, what they want to do for team of the week. And we have a decent amount of SBC content that is released right now like player SBCs like we actually we were Tang, Beloran, Benega and Ricardo Cryism. And we have four just regular flashback or player moments SBCs that are still out right now. And then, of course, we have all of these the non expiring. I guess actually Boatang is a non expiring SBC. I did not realize that. I did not realize that Boatang has no expiration date, which is cool. I like that. But yeah, so we have OK, three SBCs out. And then a lot of these other players, I know for a fact that a lot of people are doing this Boatang. I saw so many of them this week in league, it was crazy. So I would expect a couple to two or three more SBCs possibly this week. But again, the thing that I'm really curious about is to see what they do with the with the team of the weeks and what they're going to do with old promo cards, putting them back into rewards. I think they're going to do a mix of both old promo cards and older team of the weeks for rewards this week. And, you know, again, I think I've been I talked about this a little bit before. I really wish that we knew what we were playing for. Like back to the FIFA 18 days, you would be getting the rewards for the team of the week that was was prior, right? So let's say this team week 24 came out on Wednesday. You played that week in league on Friday, Saturday, Sunday. You know, three days later, you would be getting in your red picks and team of the week picks this team of the week. So you knew what you were playing for in terms of team of the week cards. I wish it was still like that. I don't hear many people talking about that anymore. But with the retalk of rewards and how they're going to have to rework them because of what's been going on, I really wish that that's how it still was. Because right now when you play a week in league, you really don't know what kind of cards you're going to be playing for. It just depends on what happens IRL. And then, of course, now we don't know what the rewards are going to be at all. So why? Yeah, it doesn't just make it doesn't make sense to not know what you're playing for, especially in the competitive mode where the rewards are what everybody is after, which is for champions. Everybody's after the rewards in for champions. So that's the biggest thing this week with the rewards and then also FIFA 19. People, I don't know if this is the message that they put out on FIFA 19, saying that, hey, week in league is going to be open. I don't know if week in league has been open prior to that. And they just put a message out saying, hey, it's going to be open for the last time now. Or if this is a new message and it wasn't open and they're opening it for one weekend. But I think that's something we're going to talk about throughout this week as well is how many people are playing week in league on FIFA 20 and how many people are going to be playing week in league on FIFA 19? Because I do think there will be some people that go and play week in league on FIFA 19 because of what EA is doing. Opening the servers back up or whatever it is, at least emphasizing the servers are going to be open for week in league this next weekend. So that's something to keep in mind as well. That's going to cause some market movements or maybe some lack of market movements as well this week. But again, team league 27 is the biggest thing. I would expect a couple more SBCs this week. And other than that, I really don't know what's going to be going on. I would expect a promo at the end of the week. I really would expect another promo happening at the end of this week, either foot birthday or carnival. It's a little late for carnival because last year that started like last week. It would have started when this foot player days was on, basically when icon swaps three came out, that's when carnival should have started as of what last year's date was. So we'll see what happens this week, but I do expect we get a promo because EA have just been pumping out the promos week after week after week. And I don't think anything's going to change because of that. We have some man of the match cards that are in packs right now. One quick short notes. A couple of these cards, I think are pretty solid to invest in. Illasic and Sabitzer are on my radar because, and honestly, is Illasic here? Illasic is the cheapest 89 rated player. Here he is, 89 rated player. The cheapest one on this game right now is Illasic for 35,000 coins. Whenever you see a man of the match or a card that is an inform or some other type of special card that is the cheapest at its rating, Arangiz is a great example as well. This Arangiz at 20,000 coins is a beautiful investment. He's going out of packs, good links. He's 87 rated. He's basically SBC fodder, but he's not a gold card that's going to be continuously packed. So I'm gonna go snag myself in Illasic if he is actually still 35K. I'm gonna go snag him right now because that is a card that I wanna get in my club as a club stock because 89s are a bit inflated right now. And I'm gonna store it by basic camp style to try to get all the fresh ones. And evidently, there are no fresh ones at 35K. That must have been a bit of an undercut. 30, wow, what the heck, man? What's it really? Am I missing cards here by not searching fresh? Usually you can search fresh and you see them because this card is in packs. So that 35,000 coins must have been an undercut, which is interesting. But if you do see this card back at 35K, that's a massive buy because the cheapest 89 rated card other than that, 37K for Illasic, the cheapest 89 rated card other than that is Kula Bali and Dehea and Allison at 40,000 coins. So if you guys do have your high rated, you're chilling. You know what, I'm just gonna buy this one at 37 and chuck it in the club because he's probably gonna be 45K plus in the next couple of weeks because he's going out of packs and he's a man of the match card and he's very rare. So I'm a fan of that, like 37K. And then let me snag it out on Geese as well because this card is pretty cheap for an 87 rated special. 21,000 coins, let's go with like this maybe. It's at a tight range because I know he has some other special cards. Yeah, he's got the 86 man of the match. I want the 87 and again, I'm gonna search for special and basic chemistry style so I can sort through the less of these cards. Although it looks like somebody's got the Arang Geese market on lockdown, interestingly enough. But this is a good investment thing that you guys can do if you're buying discard man of the matches as well. Subitzer is a great investment at a discard price. Hello EA Sports, can I get myself a Arang Geese please? The man of the match version, hello. Are there really this many of the other man of the match on the market? This is really intriguing to me. Is it gonna be worth it for me to make 5,000 coins on this card if I have to spend 10 minutes to get that 59th minute to buy him? I don't know, I really don't know. But 87 Arang Geese is a decent card if you wanna go snag one. There was one right there, how much is this? 21,000, what's this one? 20,000, are we have any cheaper back at the 59th? 20,500, any more? 21,000, that's it, all right. So I'll take that one for 20,500 right back here and I will chuck that into my club as an 87 rated. That took way too long for me to make 5,000 coins on that card. Was it worth it? I don't know boys. But that's basically like a club stock. A club stock for high-rated, but it's even better with cards that are going out of packs. Again, if you have high-rated, keep listing them for lazies. If you recall, I bought all of these 89 rated at 35K. I've been listing at 45K for the past week and they are starting to trickle off because people are doing SBCs. I bought the Sterling at 27K. I bought these Godines at 27 to 25 to 27K. So these sales have been fantastic. Continue to list your cards because if we don't have a lot of content this week, when we don't have content, people go and they do SBCs. I know there's a lot of people on the game right now because of the virus and everybody being home, schools are canceling, stuff like that. If that is you, you know, hold on to your high-rated fodder if you have it. But if you're looking to make some coins this week, you should be able to make a decent amount of coins, just trading with past team of the weeks. Now there is a little bit of risk here and this is some of my favorite trading to do because these cards fluctuate all the time, especially like right now, we're in a weakly sell-off period which could be this Bruno Fernandez card right here. This Bruno Fernandez was 700,000 coins, just like all this weekend because of the Manchester United hype with the Fred card going into objectives. Even at 700K today, he was 730 at one point. What about on Saturday, 649. So look at this fluctuation. These fluctuations are crazy. If I saw this at like 630K, maybe even 620, I would be interested. So fluctuation trading this week should be fantastic because there are more people on the game and that just means more people are gonna be doing things on this game. And that might mean some more buying power for cards that people are gonna be going and trying out. So maybe flipping icons could be a decent move this week. So Bruno Fernandez is 650, there's a bid at 640. But if you saw this guy like mid to low 600s, that could be an interesting flipping opportunity. And then the other ADA inform is coming out as well. I don't know about player of the month, Fernandez and Bape. I'll probably talk about him Bape later this week. I really don't know if that's gonna be coming. I would expect it to. But with all the stuff being shut down, the quarantine going on, they can't actually give out these awards so they're not getting announced. They might know who the actual winner is but they're not actually announcing these awards and giving them out because of all the quarantine and the shutdown and stuff like that. So again, that's like the biggest part of this week. He's like, what's gonna happen with rewards? EA kind of has to manufacture some content here. If there was a promo that was scheduled for this Friday, this next weekend, they probably already had it scheduled out and they had some ideas. So I wouldn't think that would be something they had to throw together really fast. But I do think they would have to throw together something for like the team of the week and that sort of stuff this week as well. But again, if you're trading, you're trading right now on FIFA Ultimate Team, I'm gonna say icons are probably great because they're gonna be fluctuating. There's gonna be people on the game, especially with the focus being on icon swaps. There's gonna be people that are just thinking about icons and when people are thinking about icons, they go and try icons out. There might be people. I put a tweet out earlier this weekend. I said, hey, how many of you guys go out and try icons that are in icon swap because you're interested in giving them a try first before you get them untradable if you have that option? Didn't seem like a ton of people are interested in that but I know there are some people out there that do that. So that would be a little bit of increased demand for some icons possibly. I'm trying to find a good filter right now where I can get to the 59th minute and I can't necessarily find one just yet. Okay, it looks like we found one here. But icon trading, this is some of my favorite types of trading on this game. I love trading with the big cards. The rarity of them is awesome and it's just really fun for me to trade with these. So this should be a decent way to trade this week. If you have any questions on that, I do have a video specifically talking about trading with icons. If you go on to my FIFA 20 trading methods playlist, there's a video on there talking about how to trade with icons, a couple videos actually. But that should be great this week and then of course out of pack special cards and we're in more of a dead time of FIFA at the moment and when you're in more of a slow and a dead time there's not as many people on the game. One of the things you can do to make really solid coins, this rush at 133 interests me. Wow, that's low. See, again, I haven't educated myself on some of these prices lately and they are low but open bids are going to be fantastic in this timeframe, right? Go look through some older team of the week cards. Like a Kenny LaLa would be a perfect example of somebody who's probably inflated on price. Nevermind, he's not really that up. I thought it'd be up for the Campembe man of the match. But watch for guys like this and open bid. This is the type of card on open bid, like they're right there, 17,000 coins. Not really that much profit but hey, maybe you can snag this guy at some point like 15,000 coins and you flip him for 20 to 21K. That is like a solid flip that you can expect. Like to be able to work all week. When the market is more dead like this, when we're in the second half of the year there's two things that work better. Fluctuation trading, open bids, actually three things. Fluctuation trading, open bids and Thursday flipping are all better in the second half of the year when there's less people on the market because there's less competition for that stuff but there's still enough demand that people are buying cards. So if you want to trade this week and this is what I want to talk about today as well because a lot of you guys are coming back onto the game maybe you're doing some icon swaps and you want to get some more coins. If you want to trade this week. Again, this page right here is my favorite on footbin. I love this page. Go to the players dropdown if you are on the console or on the web, go down to the team of the weeks and click right there and that will take you to a listing of all the team of the weeks and special cards on this game. Now it won't show you the CogniBull cards and it won't show you man of the matches but if you want to trade with those those are good shots as well but just trade with some of these more recent promo cards because these guys fluctuate a ton. Marcello 1.19, that's pretty low. Maras was 2.90 earlier today. This and Babu card fluctuates a ton because he's just rare. A lot of these shapeshifters are pretty rare. So just kind of learn some fluctuations. If you're going to be on fee for a little bit more this week spend a little bit of time on foot bin as well. Look at some fluctuations. This guy was 320,000 coins today back up to 350 where he is now. You know that's 10,000. If you get him at 325 and you sell him at 355 that is some solid profit right there. I'm not, that's like what maybe 355 your tax would be somewhere around like 17, 18,000 coins. So you know you'd have somewhere in the range of like 10 or 11, 12, 13 K profit on a card. If you bought it at 325 and sold at 355-ish right? If my math is correct and it even looks like you might be able to get a sale at 370. So look through some of these cards this week. Special cards if you have the itch for trading if you don't have the itch for trading and this is the other thing that I'll say this week is be careful with investing. If you're going to invest it all this week just be careful with it because I'm not quite sure again what EA is going to do with the team of the weeks. They could very easily throw in past team of week cards like this Kevin and Babu talked a little bit about it yesterday but if they threw a card like this back into packs you would see some panic selling on the foot market because people would know that when that card goes back into packs they are going to be getting supplied and what that means is they're going to be more of them on the market which is going to make their price drop. So people are going to see that card coming back into packs and they're going to panic sell it to get out of their club and get out of their team and then of course it's going to get that more supply after that. So just be careful with special cards that you do have if you're continuing to trade right now in this game and of course good luck on your icon swaps other objectives as well if you guys are grinding these good luck win 15 games.  Looks like I need to win one more game and I will get myself a prime gold players pack and then a St. Patrick's Day kit as well. I did not see this interesting. Maybe we could have some stuff on Tuesday for St. Patrick's Day. That's one thing I didn't think about. That is this Tuesday, St. Patrick's Day. So possibility for some content. I mean if they're dropping a kit I guess there's a possibility of it. So we'll just see what happens with St. Patrick's Day on Tuesday. So if you guys enjoyed this video make sure you slap a thumbs up on it. Comment down below if you have any questions and subscribe of course to the channel if you're new. This week on FIFA it's kind of like you don't know what's going on right? So we're just gonna kind of play it how it goes. See what happens. Follow EA Sports on Twitter and what they say but also just kind of figure it out as it goes. That's kind of the plan. So again, it's been Nate. I will catch you guys. I'll catch you guys in a video tomorrow, yeah? I think I've uploaded a little bit of a one to one here with me and you as the viewer. I think I've uploaded every single day. I'm averaging one video per day since the start of 2020 which has been an incredible grind.  We've been like cut solid right through like boom, boom, boom, boom all the way since January 1st I think or January 2nd. So thank you guys for supporting me. You guys make me grind this more because the support that you guys show makes me want to put more time into it and I really thank you for that. So continue that and I'll keep continuing what I am doing. Again, I will catch you guys in a video soon. Peace out.


Hi, welcome to the session. I am Deepika here. Let's discuss the question. Check whether the following is a quadratic equation. x minus 3 into 2x plus 1 is equal to x into x plus 5. Let's start the solution. Our given equation is x minus 3 into 2x plus 1 is equal to x into x plus 5 On multiplying on the left hand side we get 2x square plus x minus 6x minus 3 is equal to x square plus 5x Adding the like terms we get 2x square minus 5x minus 3 is equal to x square plus 5x Shift the terms from the right hand side to the left hand side we get 2x square minus x square minus 5x minus 5x minus 3 is equal to 0 On solving this we get x square minus 10x minus 3 is equal to 0 Given equation is of the form ax square plus bx plus c is equal to 0 Hence our answer is yes it is a quadratic equation. I hope the question is clear to you. Bye and have a nice day.


So an interesting aspect about basic income and how the state has evolved over the last 50 years is that in a certain sense, the decades of neoliberalism in the 1980s and 90s were generally seen as a period where you have austerity cuts in social spending. But the mystery is that when you look at the numbers, public spending didn't decrease in most countries. I'm Daniel Zamora. I'm a professor of sociology at the University of Brussels and I work essentially on economic history, inequality, poverty. Interestingly, over the last 20 years I think basic income has really become kind of an important topic in the development community. So of course you have the United Nations that has been promoting basic income, but even more let's say conservative institutions like the World Bank or the IMF have been kind of interested in the idea and promoting over the last 10 years at least, cash transfers as a tool for poverty alleviation. And so one might say that this is kind of a progress in a certain sense from the structural adjustment policies of the 90s and the market-driven reforms that were imposed in many countries in the global south. But at the same time we have to understand that this focus on cash, which is what makes basic income appealing, of course, is also part of kind of a broader displacement of development economics. And one aspect in particular I think has been quite important over the last 10 or 20 years is like the divorce from questions of poverty and the questions of industrialization. That was kind of a crucial question for most of the post-colonial leaders in the post-war period. So for them it was pretty clear that poverty was not the problem per se. The question was probably was a symptom of a broader question, which was the question of industrialization and the relations between the north and the south and the inequality relations between the north and the south, especially trade relations. And so of course when you think about poverty in that framework, the solution is not just cash transfers. It's about transforming the global division of labor. It's about a state-led industrial policy and that was really at the core of their vision of development. So what's interesting here is like for them poverty elevation was about transforming the economies in which the poor actually live, rather than allowing them to be part of the market, to be part of the economy. So it's not just about altering income distribution but to think or to contest the way we share labor at the global scale more generally. And so the shift here, which I think is kind of important to understand why basic income has become so popular, is a shift from let's say the 50s and 60s a developmental state that is really up to direct investment, to control prices, to create jobs in certain industries from what we call in the book a transfer state. So a state that is less concerned about actually intervening in the economy but just reshaping the distribution of income. So in a certain sense there's a shift from a state that is concerned from rights of the citizens to a state that is more concerned about the spending power of consumers. So there's kind of an important transition here that as you see is not just different tools that we use to think about poverty but it's really how we think about poverty itself that has radically changed and where money takes a bigger part of the story, the meaning of development in that story has radically changed. You immediately see how the policies of the 90s, so that was made by the World Bank and the IMF in countries like Mexico, most of the countries, a lot of countries in Latin America certainly also in South Africa, were basic income or cash transfers because they didn't implement basic income itself but the rise of cash transfers wasn't an alternative to those policies but it was a compliment to it because those policies actually created more inequality, created more poverty in most of those countries and then the question that emerged immediately is how can we mitigate those effects, reduce a new certain sense of poverty but without putting in jeopardy the market reforms and keeping the whole market framework keeping the whole privatization agenda but at the same time guaranteeing to everyone a certain minimal standard of living. So what is kind of striking is that the rise of cash transfers wasn't, let's say, a contestation of the last decades of the 90s and all those reforms, market driven reforms but it was a way to a certain sense go hand in hand with those reforms and created, let's say, a less market with a human face but without really putting into question what are the causes of poverty. You can ask anyone what is poverty, well, everybody will respond it's lacking of money, it's like an obvious answer, right? But for a long time this wasn't the obvious response, I mean this is kind of a recent definition of poverty, one that is actually based on the income distribution, so your place within the income distribution, that's how we call it an inter-individual definition of inequality or poverty. The problem with that definition is that in a certain sense it abstracts poverty so it becomes something that is not embedded within social relations, especially relations of power, so most of the, let's say, thinkers of the early 20th century that thought about poverty, for many of them it was clear that poverty was a question of power relations, so it was the effect of the unequal relations, of power relations within especially the labor market, so if you want to tackle poverty it's not about giving money, it's about giving them more power, it's about transforming those relations, so by allowing collective bargaining, by creating unions, by actually reducing the grip of the market on people's lives, meaning that they actually don't need money to get healthcare, to get education, to get a lot of things, so the rise of this, let's say, cash-centered definitions of poverty, in a certain sense shadows all those political questions about how we organize society, about how we share power, how we define our needs, how we define the jobs we want to do, if you think about it you can immediately see how you can think about poverty of course by the side of money, but you can also think about the other side, meaning reducing the dependence on markets, so of course if you say tomorrow there is rent control it will have an effect on poverty, if tomorrow healthcare is free it will have an effect on poverty, because of course people don't need money to then get those services, and I think that over the last 40 years we've really shifted from one vision of it, which was increasing the rights that people have and then increasing the service they receive and then increasing the market and the dependence we have on the market, we shifted from another vision where we allowed privatization of most public services, we allowed deregulation of the labor market, but at the same time we actually improved the access of cash to a certain amount of people, so we improved in terms of the fiscal apparatus of the state while it retreated on other aspects, especially on public services, and this is the thing is one of the questions that we should contest if we want to think about poverty today and getting away from this kind of a very narrow understanding of poverty, center on cash and center on money. The idea is that and the problem especially one of famous economists of the 20th century called Milton Friedman, so one of Chicago economists, one of the probably most important neoliberal economists, he was actually concerned about in the 30s when he was actually working within the federal estate in the US, he was actually concerned about the rising inequality and poverty, which might be surprising for neoliberal economists but it was definitely a problem for them, it's like okay if we have a free market it generates huge inequalities and what is our response to that, and this is the reason why he came up with a version of basic income, one of the earliest versions of basic income, which was if you want to provide to people a minimum set of resources while keeping the market, keeping what is said the price mechanism that allows society to be organized through decentralized investments, then what we need is to create a system where people if they fall under a certain threshold they will receive money from the state, would be a basic income. So the idea is of course that you can do welfare, you can provide people a certain level of income but without altering the market mechanism, so that's what's his first concern, of course it was huge criticism of the Roosevelt policies and the New Deal and it's kind of an alternative to the welfare state, so instead of having public health care, public education, public services, then you can just get some money and you go on the market and you do the choices you want to do for yourself, so it's a very different vision about how we think about needs and I think this is kind of an important question is how we think about needs and how the way we think about needs has changed over the last 50 years at least because the market is not something that reveals needs that are already there or economists like to say that they reveal preferences, the market actually constitute needs and there is kind of a famous quote from Steve Jobs who said that nobody knew he wanted an iPhone before seeing an iPhone, so of course he actually does produce needs that weren't already there so we rely definitely more on the market to constitute the needs we have as a society unless on collective decision making which was what three men didn't like the fact that rather than letting private investor decide what we need we can put some of those resources in common and decide together what we need and that of course the outcome is very different because the decision is a democratic one rather than one made by consumers and this is I think one of the big shifts that happen during that period and it also makes basically a more appealing solution for welfare because it doesn't require for us to argue or to discuss democratically about our needs but just for consumers to go on the market and make their decisions as they see fit so an interesting aspect about basic income and how the state has evolved over the last 50 years is that in a certain sense the decades of neoliberalism in the 80s the 90s were generally seen as a period where you have austerity cuts in social spending but the mystery is that when you look at the numbers public spending didn't decrease in most countries neither in the United States why it actually increased neither in Europe but what really changed and this is kind of a significant change is the way the states spend its money so while let's say in the 50s the state will I don't know pay for healthcare pay for public servants and actually directly employ a lot of people or build for example social public housing the transition we had in that period was not in reducing spending but rather than building housing we will give you some cash to help you with your rent meaning what we want is like the market to do some it's work in the housing and if there is a problem then we can help you with cash so basically the state in a certain sense public spending stayed the same but the nature of the state radically changed it became definitely more a state that in a certain sense let's say doesn't act on the market but on the borders of the market or around the market by transferring some cash and by altering the rules let's say the conditions of the game rather than completely changing the game which was I think the aim of the new deal and the policies in the post-war period I think if you want to understand also the rising relevance of basic income it's increasing appeal because of course the idea has been around for a long time it's only since the late 60s that it has become let's say policy proposal that is actually considered by politicians and policy makers it's the reason why it really becomes something on the agenda while it was around way before right was in part I mean certainly because we began to think about poverty in monetary terms so for a long time this definition is like quite marginal and then by the 70s we really began to have our contemporary definitions of poverty which is like your position in the income distribution right but of course this this definition has a certain limits I mean it doesn't give you for example a good sense of what does it mean to be poor in a country if you are poor in a country where there is free healthcare and a country where there isn't free healthcare having a certain amount of money it's a completely different thing so your life would be radically different so it doesn't really consider the institutions in which you are living and especially the relation between the state the market and the individuals in those societies so this let's say monetization of poverty completely put aside all those political questions about our relation to the market and also individualized poverty it seems as something that is an accident that is you're in that place in the income distribution but we don't really know why we don't really know the causes and all the policies became more about attacking on the effects of the market meaning the market creates all those inequalities by altering the income distribution rather than actually attacking the market itself and transforming the the causes of poverty so we shifted let's say from a social policy that was about transforming the causes to a social policy that was also only about mitigating the effects


Several viral infections can lead to hearing loss, which may be congenital or acquired, unilateral or bilateral, sensory neural, conductive, or mixed. These viruses can directly damage inner ear structures, induce inflammatory responses, or increase susceptibility to bacterial or fungal infection. Some of these viral infections can be prevented or treated, and guidelines for their treatment or prevention have recently been revised. This review outlines the viruses that cause hearing loss, their epidemiology, course, prevention, and treatment. This article was authored by Brandon E. Cohen and Durstenfeld, in Pamela C. Rome.