Hi, I'm Zor. Welcome to Inezor Education. Today will be the first lecture where we will see just the first look at theory of relativity, one particular very narrow aspect of theory of relativity. This lecture is about time, how we measure time and how the time is measured in different inertial systems. Now, this lecture is part of the course called Relativity for All. It's presented in Unizor.com, together with two other courses, which are, I would say, prerequisites, mass for teens and physics for teens. Now, the whole website is totally free. There are no advertisements, so it's open for everybody. You don't even have to sign in. However, there are some additional functionalities which you might be interested in. For example, supervisory study. So where there is a parent or a supervisor kind of supervise your flow of educational material which you have to study. Then you do have to sign in and your supervisor as well. Also, every lecture has very detailed notes on this website. So, in any way, I just recommend you to watch this lecture from the website and read the notes for every lecture. That will be much more beneficial than if you just found the lecture by itself somewhere on YouTube or wherever. Okay, so let's go back to time. First of all, there are a couple of very, very fundamental things which we have to agree, and physicists based on their theoretical and experimental data obviously agree. These are principle of relativity and constant speed of light in all inertial frames in, let's say, in vacuum. It's in the same kind of category in other media as well, but that's much more difficult. So, that's why we're talking about space, vacuum, empty space, and all inertial frames have the speed of light exactly the same. That's basically a result of, again, experimental data like Michelson-Molley experiment which we were talking about before, like Maxwell's equation and some other considerations. Okay, so these are two fundamental things. Speed of light constant in all the inertial frames in vacuum and we will deal only with inertial frames in vacuum and principle of relativity. Let me just, again, repeat about principle of relativity. It basically means that there's supposed to be no way you can distinguish one inertial system from another. All the laws are supposed to be exactly the same. So, if you are immersed in one particular inertial system, there is no experiment which you can make, which you can conduct, which would reveal that this particular inertial system is moving with, you know, certain speed relative to, let's say, another inertial system. And there is no, like, one particular inertial system which is hooked to our space. And it's basically like at rest in the space. Space does not have this type of thing. So every inertial system is exactly the same as another and you cannot distinguish one from another. All the processes are happening in exactly the same way. So if you, let's say, take certain apparatus, build it in one inertial system, and it behaves a certain way, it works the same, a certain way, then you take this apparatus and you move with this apparatus to another inertial system. It will behave exactly the same thing. There will be no difference in the behavior of this apparatus. If you grow a corn, let's say, in one inertial system and then you move to another inertial system, which basically has the same kind of different, well, the same conditions. It's a different system, but the same conditions, the same soil, the same corn seed, etc., whatever it is. It will grow in exactly the same way with exactly the same speed, regardless of whether one system is moving relative to another or not, in the direction of moving, because as long as they're all inertial, no difference whatsoever. You will not be able to recognize. Okay, being as it may, there is a very important time property which we have inherited from the time of Galileo, etc. I was talking about this time property when I was discussing the Galilean transformation. Namely, time is absolute and universal. So if you have two different inertial systems, then the time is exactly the same and there is absolutely no difference. If you look from one inertial system onto events in another inertial system, you will see exactly the same thing as if the person who is immersed in that other inertial system sees these same events. And that is something which I'm going to deny today. So the absolute character of time is something which theory of relativity really have put an end to. Time is not absolute. It's not like universal, whatever. So if you see certain event from inside the one inertial system and you see the same event from another inertial system which moves relative to the first one, the timing would be different. Okay, so this is something which, to tell you the truth, I was amazed myself when I learned about this. I was probably in school at the time, long, long time ago. I was reading the book. I think it was a book written by Einstein and maybe a rumor or something. I don't remember really. And they were basically explaining what I'm going to explain to you right now. And it seems to be logically correct. Everything was fine. But as a result, we have come up with this particular difference in time variation from different systems, from different inertial systems. So I will basically do the same thing. It's really simple. It's just plain algebra, if you wish, and a little bit of logic. What I believe is very important is that some people, and Einstein definitely was one of them, they were thinking much deeper than the rest of us about very simple things. Time seems to be a simple thing. And when you think about this a little deeper and you're thinking about certain thought experiments which you can conduct, and you see that it's not that simple. I mean, that's the revelation, basically. So that was a revelation for me some time ago, and I will attempt to basically convey it to you. Okay, so first of all, what we need is, we need some apparatus to measure the time. And this apparatus should be relatively simple and universal, applicable to any inertial frame. And here is what I suggested. Let's consider you have some kind of a rigid rod made of some metal or whatever. It doesn't really matter. And on one end, you have a source of light. On another end, you have a mirror. Now, what happens is we send a ray of light towards the mirror. Well, we send it everywhere, but one of the rays, exactly one way actually reaches the mirror, reflects back, and we have some kind of a sensor device here. And the length of this rigid rod is fixed, and we can install this particular device anywhere. And the time between sending the ray of light to the mirror and getting it back is our unit of time which we can measure something with some kind of other events. Now, this is an event by itself. Sending the ray up and getting it down, that's the event, and it has certain time, obviously. And using this unit of time, we can measure some other events. But that's besides the point. So we're talking about this particular case. We took this particular device and we have this particular kind of device to measure time and to observe it from different standpoint. You can actually imagine, like, we have some kind of a room or whatever. Car doesn't matter. And we installed this device here. So this is the source of light. This is the mirror, and light goes up and then down, and that's the event which we are talking about. Now, let's consider now two different inertial systems. One inertial system is this car. Well, let's say standing still doesn't really matter, but at some particular state. So this is alpha. And the alpha reference frame has certain coordinates. X, Y, Z, and time T. Now, at some time, we have decided to have exactly the same car, but the car will be moving with some speed B. Okay, now this same car represents a different inertial system. So the first inertial system is called A alpha when the car stands still. And another system would be beta, and I will use lower case coordinates, X, Y, Z, and time T to describe events in that particular system. In this case, it's moving car. Okay? Now, considering the principle of relativity, if we have an alpha observer, which means observer which is in the system alpha, it sees this event and it has certain time while the ray of light goes up and down. Now, when the car is moving and you take another observer which is local to this moving car, let's call it beta observer, it will basically see exactly the same thing because we know that the principle of relativity states that all the events are supposed to be exactly the same, which means that the timing of ray going up and down in the moving car for the beta observer who is inside that moving car should be exactly the same as for the alpha observer who was observing that particular event when the car was standing still. Okay? Now, this speed V is the speed of beta system relative to alpha system. And let's just talk about this thing the following way. So, let's say this is x, y and z and this is lower case x, z and y. This is upper case. So, the whole system is moving only along the x-axis. It just makes my life easier and you will understand it better. So, let's just forget about y. Now, let's say this distance is r. So, our source of light is at the origin of this coordinate system in here and here. Now, this one is moving with the speed V. This one is standing still. And let's analyze what exactly the alpha observer sees inside this car if he can see. I mean, he can analyze it just logically. So, alpha observer analyzes how this particular event is occurring in the beta reference frame. So, again, we know that alpha observer sees within the alpha system event as such and the beta observer within beta system sees exactly the same thing. But I'm talking about cross reference. So, alpha observer who stands on the ground, let's say, when the car was on the ground, this particular observer sees events in the moving car. And how can this particular alpha observer evaluate this event and how long does it take? Okay. So, that's the most important part. So, I'm talking about cross evaluation from an observer in one system looking at events in another system. From the Galilean standpoint, from the standpoint of old physics, this particular guy should see exactly the same thing as the moving, as the beta observer sees inside the car. But, again, if you think about this more thoroughly, you will see that this is not the case. And here is one. Now, what happens? The ray of light starts here, which means at origin, let's say, at some moment we started our experiment, the origin is at point x0, okay? Origin of the beta system relative to the alpha coordinate. So, this is x0. At this point, we have sent the light everywhere. Now, the light ray, which goes vertically up, would not actually hit the mirror, because during the time it goes up, the mirror will move to the right, because the car moves to the right, which means it's not the vertical ray which will reach the mirror. It will be the one which is going at some angle, because by the time we reach the top of the car, the mirror will move here. So, it's not this ray, it's this ray will reach, and then it will reflect, and again it will be here, x1. So, by the time ray of light would be reflected and sensed by the sensor which is here, the trajectory of the light would be like this, not up and down, but at the angle, and then it will reflect at the same angle, and it will be accepted at further point. So, by this time the ray goes up and down, the whole system, the whole car in this case, will move from x0 to x1, so that would be a new location of origin. Now, the light goes with the same speed everywhere, regardless of the speed of inertial systems relative to another inertial system. So, it takes time, and by this time obviously it's a longer trajectory. It's longer than this one, which means there should be a difference in time. So, the event which took certain time going up and down for the beta observer, the alpha observer sees it differently. It sees that the light goes along the longer trajectory. The same event, which happens with one interval of time, during one interval of time in one system, in this system in alpha reference frame, takes longer. So, local event for the beta observer is shorter by time going up and down vertically than the event observed, the same event, but observed by the person who is outside of this particular system. Well, let's just evaluate how exactly they are related. Now, I'm using these letters to basically signify the time in the alpha system and lower case in the beta system, which is moving, and I will use indices. So, t-alpha would be the time for this event for observer in the alpha system of the event which is in the alpha system. So, capital T means that I'm using the observer in this alpha system and the event itself occurs in this alpha system. So, what is my time? My time is whenever I go up and down, so r and r divided by the speed. So, it's 2r by speed of light. Now, what if I'm in a moving car? I'm using the lower case because it's a beta observer and I am using the event which happens local in the same. That's exactly the same thing. We are talking about principle of relativity. So, these two timings, this is the time of this event going to the mirror and back in the alpha system for the alpha observer and this is event which happens in the beta system for beta observer. It's supposed to be exactly the same. What I'm trying to calculate right now is t-beta. Now, what is t-beta? That's how the alpha observer uses alpha coordinates in alpha time, how it sees event which happens in the beta frame. That's what I would like to understand. So, from the perspective of alpha observer, event is going this way and then this way, right? So, let's say the time of this event is t-beta. Now, what happens during this time? Well, during this time I know that this is the time the whole system moved to the right with the speed v, which means that my x0, x1 segment equals to speed of moving the car v times my t-beta, right? Now, let's divide it by 2. Let's call it pq. Now, obviously, x0, q, x1 is a socialist triangle. The angle of reflection is the same. So, that's kind of easy. This is r. Now, this is half of this, right? So, the length x0, q, x0, q by theorem, by Pythagorean theorem, square is equal to r square plus half of that. r square plus 1 half of this segment, x0, x1, which is this one. 1 half of vc beta square. Okay? Okay. Now, the light goes all the way this and this. So, it covers basically two lengths of this. So, if I will have double this length, that would be the trajectory covered by the light during the same time capital T beta. So, c times capital T beta is the length of this thing. So, it's double square root of r square plus 1 half vt beta square. So, this is kind of equation, if you wish. So, what do we do with this? We don't do this anymore. So, we will just square it. So, c square t beta square equals 4r square plus 1 half vt beta square. And this 4r square equals ct beta square minus this 1 half square would be 4 and this 4 will be canceling each other. And v square t beta equals c square minus v square t beta. Simple algebra, right? Okay, fine. From this, now, this is how our event happens locally. This is local for alpha, this is local for beta, but they are the same because of principle of relativity. So, from here, we can see that 2r is equal to c times t beta from which 4r square is equal to c times lower t beta. So, what is lower case t beta? That's how the event is seen locally by the beta observer. What is capital T beta? That's how exactly the same event in the beta reference frame is evaluated by the person which is in the alpha reference frame. So, these things are equal to each other, which means ct beta square of this square, obviously. Equals ct beta square square minus, well, I can put this here, minus v square t beta square from which follows that t beta square is equal to t beta square c square divided by c square minus v square. But let's just divide it by c square both things. And we will see that it will be 1 minus v square divided by c square. Let's just get rid of the squares and put square root here. And 1 over square root of 1 minus v square over c square is traditionally called gamma. So, t beta is equal to gamma t beta. So, what does it mean? By the way, v is obviously much smaller than speed of light. So, this is smaller than 1, so this is greater than 1, which means my capital T beta is always greater than lowercase t beta, which means that locally event is viewed as a shorter event than if you look at the same event from outside from another inertial framework. It's called time dilation, basically. There is a term for this time dilation. Now, this is very important, which means what? The time is not absolute. How I, from the alpha system, see events in the beta system happening is not the same time, they take longer. As I see them, they take much longer, much or not much, depending on the speed v, obviously. The greater the speed v, the closer this is to 1, which means the closer denominator is to 0, which means the greater would be gamma. So, as v is increasing, gamma is increasing as well, which means that events from the outsider, events in some particular framework, from outside of that framework, would seem to be taking longer than they seem to be from the local guy, whoever is in the beta system itself. That's what's very important, and that's one of the first things which I personally learned about zero relativity, that the time is not absolute, and people are saying that the time goes slower or whatever. I mean, this is kind of a very general kind of description about the time. It's much more precise to say the following, that if there is a certain event, event is supposed to be taking certain time for a local to this event person, and it takes for an observer from the outside, this event takes longer. Basically, that's what it is. Well, so time dilation is very important kind of property, and that's one of the first things which you can be introduced in studying theory of relativity. Not only the time actually is, how should I say, subjective. Well, it's subjective because it depends on who exactly is kind of sensing the flow of time. If it's a local guy and the inertial frame is moving, it's one speed, and if it's somebody from outside look at the events which are happening in this moving car or whatever, he sees it differently. Now, but from the symmetrical standpoint, if beta is moving with speed v relative to alpha, it means alpha is moving with speed minus v relative to beta. You can consider beta to be basically stationary, and alpha moving with the speed minus v. And considering we have v square here, it doesn't really matter whether it's plus v or minus v, which direction is moving, it's unidirectional. It all depends only on the absolute value of the speed. So from the observer at beta, if he looks at events which are happening in alpha frame, the result will be the same. From alpha event it would be, for alpha observer event would be shorter than it would be evaluated by the person outside in the beta frame, which means in our equation that would be very similar, but I should change beta to alpha and alpha to beta. So if we are talking about alpha event, this is how it's viewed by an inner alpha observer, and this is how long it takes for an observer from the beta system, the same direction. So alpha observer sees events in beta system as taking longer than local guy, but the beta observer sees events in alpha system also taking longer than for alpha observer, the local guy. In some way, I mean, it's strange because there is no absolute, everything is relative. It's not like event really takes longer in one thing than another. No, event is exactly the same. It's just seen longer from the outside than it takes according to the senses of the local guy. In some way it might be similar to, let's say you have two people looking at each other from a distance. Each one seems to be smaller than he really is because of perspective, right? So if you have A and B, A looks at B, and B kind of seems to be smaller than the real size. Same thing if B looks at A, also smaller, but none of them is smaller than another, it's just the viewpoint. What's important is the viewpoint. If you look from the distance, it looks smaller. That's it. If you look here from another inertial system, the event takes longer. That's it. Okay, I do suggest you to read notes for this lecture. As I was saying, it's on Unisor.com, the course called Relativity for All, and if you will open that menu option, you will see the Einstein view onto Relativity versus Galilean view, which was kind of predates. Okay, that's it for today. I thank you and I wish you good luck.


Good morning. Thanks for still being here with us on the breakfast on plus TV Africa It's now time for off the press and that's our segment on the breakfast We'll take a look at the stories making headlines in Nigeria today We've invited a mr. Ademola akimboa at the publisher of the podium media. Good morning. Thank you for joining us Thanks for having me again. Happy new month for us. Same to you. All right Let's go straight into the daily independent newspaper. The headline here reads how Conflicts in interest led to suspension of 280 million US dollars Passport insurance scheme. That's the daily independent newspaper. Gov. Nokoa here says Southern governors all critics know apologies open grazing ban restructuring or her knees it condemns ACF's Southeast travel advisory to Northerners Also Constitutional review had carried a loop course for scrapping of Senate Buhari says desperate power sickers plotting my administration's failure It's a vassity professor suspended over alleged sexual abuse APC presidential hopefuls move to install loyalists in national working committee Ninjas school abduction the government confirms bandits arrest Neko registrar died of national natural causes and Neko and a family So that's a you know adding more clarity to the story there after news reporter Lester He had been assassinated In the dead of the night. Those are the stories on the daily independent. All right the Nigerian Tribune Coming up next We can see on the screen it's gonna be up in a few seconds. Yes as you there is this Shocker waits those who wants to destroy my government. That's from president Buhari Says Bernie and a vinyl coffins is won't stop elections Insecurity, we're tired of observing one-minute silence as a Senate president Constitutional review. What's it back? Here are the loopholes for part-time, you know Cameroon federal parliament Also a 90-year-old commit suicide in Kadena amoteco arrest suspected ritual killer recovers human skull the bones guns and charms federal government accelerates local COVID-19 vaccine from her production And also agitations good for development part of democracy about your government declares We can also see police guard Neko registrar's residence in Mina as the son says his father died during a brief illness and we can also see a Shea mackin day slashes a lau-tech tuition fees by 25 percent Senate approves federal pulley Illaro to become a university Southeast governor's call for probe into gulag's death and Only one thousand seven hundred oil reserves producing out of seven thousand discovered and that's from the federal government The all right, I think these are the stories we can show in the tribune this morning on the punch newspaper stop threats PDP tells Buhari as federal government again promises tough actions President blames politicians just lean for power says it'll be hard on troublemakers Also, the PDP says lead battle against Intercurity match words with action enough of threats Above the headline on the punch newspaper external reserves dropped by 640 million dollars in May That's according to the CBN Senate threatens arrest of 56 MDA chiefs over probe Federal government says we're reviving grays and reserves in 21 states 2023 constitutional crisis looms over attacks I neck alerts Buhari Scraps Senate make National Assembly part-time to reduce governance cost at Kyridolou oil prices rises above 87 above $70 OPEC projects demand growth Also on the front page of the punch newspaper. I saw Osho Malay is a almost congratulation messages on social media That's according to a Basquee and we can see a picture here of a rally With the PDP flag apparently supporters of a basquee. They're celebrating his victory at the Supreme Court Also on the punch newspaper Buhari congratulates NGE as Isawa in second term Rector excited as Senate or case Ilaro Polytechnic's upgrade to University Immoffling inmates steals Lagos Church members belonging to during vigil Businessmen accuses policemen of assaults extortion of five thousand five hundred dollars Bitcoin 4 a suspense lecturer over alleged sexual harassment another under probe and lastly on the punch newspaper bandits confirm kidnap of 156 90 popes demand 110 million Naira ransom Wow, I think that's that's quite contradictory after we just saw that one of the bandits was arrested And now it demand for ransom. Well, the nation news was a I think our final paper this morning Buhari to arsonist and killers agitators. I will shock you Also in the nation and to graft war customs CG top officers to declare assets controversy of a NECO registrar's death Editors urge to join government and fight against fake news Macindy slashes lau-tech tuition by 25% Also, Kauara governor and PDP disagree on achievements Tall likely to return on federal highways 110 million I ran some for school kids. That's also in the news this morning Insecurity won't define our administration says the says the federal government And they're also amoteco arrest suspected body parts dealer in Ibadon six killed in Kaduna No excuses were president tell service chiefs and IG attacks on ionic facilities won't affect future polls Exactly. Well, I good morning once again. I think we will start with The federal government saying in security won't define our administration Um, there's you know, roughly two years left in the administration Do you think that you know something else will be able to define the administration of the or the current administration? Absolutely nothing Insecurity has already defined this administration I said it sometimes that don't matter what you achieve in other areas if you cannot secure life some properties They were much different. Okay The way I see Nigeria today, I see something like four-way parts for the soul of Nigeria Okay, just like the Berlin conference of 1886 of that about this comes from Africa before we Battle for Nigeria. You have the bandits are criminal You have restructuring agitators. I pop Sunday. Oh, you have governor Especially certain governors who have beaten against their not an counterpart on open grazing Then of course your presidency is struggling to hold on to whatever is left for Nigeria So you you just look at what the minister said I just laugh Okay, you are telling others we should only use security to judge government or that you meant which are the achievements They're not saying that we can see any achievement. Okay. The economy is not doing well There's no there's no there's no stability in exchange rate in securities order of the day What else are we going to use to judge this government? So I think that's just a sandbite I wish we know it's just the way the president was sounding off yesterday. Okay You want to shock them? Yeah, we look forward to that shock. Okay. It's long overdue. People really want to see government taking action Okay, not sounding off not issuing threats. We want to see action So and each time the president comes out to issue a threat The band is keeping us the kidnapped us the other way of responding. So I pray that in another two or three days Something tell it will not happen. It's like what was that in my mind testing comments commitment. Mr. Kim Yes, you know, it says, you know, I think it's on the tribune that Ordination it's as reported as you will shock them But you know, if you look at the tweets and of also the video clip, you know from when president made that statement He called, you know, and you know spoke about the civil war spoke about, you know, the experiences in the civil one then says, you know, we'll treat them in a language that they Understand or that we understand that doesn't seem like it is directed at the Bandits or the criminals and those who are destroying, you know Government facilities it seems Because I'm trying to link, you know, both of them to the civil war. How do those two things come together? What what the president was trying to say is that for those who have constrained terrorism for those who are backing All these bandits that government to come after them those who are financing them is going to come after them Linking that to see what it's like. Say look, we've been through a 30 month civil war. Okay No nations survived two civil wars. So it's probably time to let people know look if we continue this way We will end up having a civil war. But unfortunately, Nigeria is already at war with itself Okay, Nigeria is at war with itself. I Thought about the strong way back to for the soul of Nigeria. Okay, so what the president is trying to say is that look We've been through this before let's lower them. Do not let us let this Degenerate for that. But see you need to do something you need to take certain actions For peace to return to the interior. There has to be justice. Okay, there's stability all this ethnic Inclinations Everybody in Nigeria has lost conflict and lost hope in that entity called Nigeria project Nigeria does not fascinate when longer most people They may not come out to open the call for the structure on it, but people are Beginning to say look what exactly are we getting from be together? Okay? I'm not advocating for us to have a photo to To be divided was if you if you also listen to what golf and I gradually said asking for a unique ever Legislature as a decision should be spent a totally sort of a call Okay, because it's like the National Assembly has had no effect We haven't felt the impact in any way. Okay. I said earlier on that a national assembly that is open doing Should not put a lot of it on the president to either resign or perform so for me It's not a year or death it's time for all to face the reality that things are not working which working and The president to me has come to us with it I do not know of any new team that this decision will come up with to reverse The trend I do not know. All right. Okay. I do not know I do not see anything new that they want to see or that wants to yeah So still talking about, you know security matters in Nigeria. I was into Conflicts in headlines about the same story in Niger state Recall that about 200 students had been abducted from an Islamic school in the state and here On the daily independent newspaper the headline, you know Told us that Niger school. It says Niger school abductions government confirms bandits arrest and when I read the story The Niger state government, you know was assuring Nigerians that we have some of the bandits in our custody We will not pay ransom We will get the children released safe and sound but on the punch news paper Another source here says bandits confirm kidnap of 156 Niger popes demand 110 million Naira ransom. So I don't know what the information is And if indeed the government just like they said have some of the bandits in their custody Why can they force out a confession of the location and you know that release the students mr Hakeem Bola Yeah, absolutely The most important thing for the parents of this case is for them to release Whether the bandits have been arrested or not, whether they're asking for ransom or not We want the kids to release and that is when we take that seriously at this point You can't rule out propaganda. You can't rule out information management. Okay Truth is always the first casualty when crisis of this state are up So until the kids are released We do not want to believe anything that is coming from the government The media also needs to be very careful in reporting stuff like this. Okay Um, we shouldn't take every press statement of every press release that government officials sent to us We shouldn't take them as as as it goes to truth Otherwise, we'll be misleading people and we we we we will be unfairly seen or judged Not to be uh, cooperated with society In fighting criminality So it's unfortunate that we have this confusing report But I I think we we should keep our focus on getting the kids to release until they are released. We can't believe anybody Well, so that's the situation we are in today. So I I I I can't agree with you There's absolutely no reason for this disparity in space Well, it's also um important to note that you know over the years since uh chibok and dapchi Not very much seems to have changed with regards, you know being able to protect school children Yeah, we haven't improved, you know on our security tactics or security apparatus We haven't improved in any way and kids are still very much in danger in Nigeria. So not much has changed Um, but let's talk about the controversy over the neko registrars. Nothing has changed. Um, there's um Those who say that he was assassinated, you know neko put out a statement saying he died after a brief illness Um, you why can't we get any clarity? The same question will ask that why hasn't a post mortem be done A simple autopsy will tell us the cause of the death We we like I said we would like to compliment seemingly simple issues Okay The most reliable source of information that will undertake his course of death is an autopsy It was assassinated. Why is it true? Why is the evidence if he died after a brief illness? What was the nature of the illness? Okay, we we live in a country where there's so much um A lot of things are shrouded in secrecy, especially concerning public officials. I want to wonder what is the big deal Okay, why is it why so difficult for us to get exactly the truth? What really killed him? So if the family is saying that after a brief illness, why don't you believe that? Why do we want to come up with concrete? By who? Who asked the truth? Who asked the evidence? So, Mr. Kimbalan, really? Personally, I would like to go with the line that The family has come out that died Yes, yes I think this issue is Yes, please This issue seems more complicated because The news reports we saw online said that the wife of, you know, professor Gotsville had said that These assassins came into the house. They simply killed him and they took nothing. They just left But the next morning we saw a message from Neco that said that the son had forwarded a message to them saying The father died of a heart failure or heart attack. It wasn't clear But the story that really tips the skills for me is the Nigerian Tribune. It says police guard Neco registrar's residence in Mina As son says father died during briefing. So why would the police need to guard the house? If he if he had died of natural causes just just a question there that we need to ask Don't you think? Yeah, as a result of the controversy that has now Yeah, because now there's a controversy surrounding that the police need to guard the residence Maybe do for some time praying with evidence. Okay, so the police probably will not want to sweep under the carpet The the the the the claim that was assassinated. All right, so Apparently the police wants to try to investigate Court of the residence prevents anybody from sampling any evidence while investigation continues. So it's an interesting development Which will look forward to unfolding more in the days to come But as we speak, like I said the son sent a message that his father died after a prevalent The wife said he was assassinated. Okay, can we have an autopsy? I'm sure the cops have not disappeared The body of this gentleman has not disappeared. Let's condone an autopsy and that will solve The riddle for me Okay, all right. Um, I think we can also quickly speak on Uh, the uh, lautech issue. Uh, governor makinde slashing school fees in lautech by 25 percent Um, if you remember a couple of years ago, actually lautech has been you know in in years and years of you know One crisis or the other Shea makinde seems to be doing a little different or doing a little better. Uh, the governor before he looked at jimobi Um, had a totally different reaction to you know, the agitations in lautech Um, so quick thoughts on that one before we wrap up My question is is this sustainable? Was it a decision he took In order to be correct or did he do his homework and discover that the state government could do with that 25 percent reduction I I I I I am not sure that Decision is sustainable. We know the way things are actually for you to slash school fees Then what is the project that you have airmarked for this institution? What is the quality of education that's being delivered there? Okay, I have no problem with fees being sliced But don't do things because we want to be in the good book of the students or because we want to um, uh Same to between the right thing. Is this sustainable? In this state economy where inflation is rising Purchasing power is jointly I I I do not see how the government will be able to sustain it. But if they're able to good news Good news if they're able to but I doubt it. All right So still talking about education We know that the senate has approved the federal polytechnic ilaro to become a university And still about education another story here That we're seeing about The school i'm trying to get that story out now, but yes, it's a four year Four year suspense lecture over alleged sexual harassment and another on the probe So seems like we're making quite some some headway Regarding the sex for grades issue Especially we know that when that documentary by the bpc came out It put a lot of lights on you know lectures universities people who are supposed to be custodians of the students who you know Break that trust. So um, what are your comments on what the school here is doing? And also on the other hand about the upgrade of that ilaro polytechnic to a university Okay, um sex for graders do with us forever. I mean, I think um Social media technology is probably helping us To to to discover so many and I think we live that we are yet to even scratch the surface Okay, um, whatever Discovery has made nice problem. Maybe one percent Is he going on as speak and it is going to end Very soon due to so many reasons. Okay. Uh, we have students these days who don't believe in studying Um, we have students who don't have time who would be living? Um, money can get them anything they want or the audience their body So it's commendable for four years to have done that and I would just advise them not to relent and other institutions through To international efforts to ensure that Um, those lecturers who are involved in such practices are identified the upgrade of federal polytechnic ilaro to university Good, but what is driving? their decision University for what? Okay, technology what aspect of technology? Okay, the federal polytechnic ilaro as it is Just like the other nuclear institution is struggling So when you upgrade are you going to give them more money? for research Are you going to give them more money for equipment? Or is this just an upgrade? Because we want to look good So I I I'm not going to be dancing or jubilating because it's it's it's upgraded Polytechnic was set up for specific for specific purposes If you're going to upgrade the universal technology Then you need to do your homework you need to make sure that you have money To fund research technology involves research innovation Ideas incubation do we have the money to fund all of this? Do we have the structures? Okay, so for me I it's it's not too much of a sharing is for me I mean for those who want to profit from such For those who want to score political points Good luck to them. But when you look at these issues realistically With the knowledge of what has happened in Nigeria It's nothing So to jump around all right. Let's talk, you know, let's go back to the south um, there's a story on the uh Tribune this morning saying Southeast governors call for probe into i mean gulak's death um So I want you to speak with regards to southeast governors and you know the role that they Expected to play at a time like this when the southeast seems to be Um, you know suffering its worst, um, you know security challenges in a very very long time There's also been a twitter hashtag questions for us on dimma Which you know went on yesterday and people question in you know his you know role You know and um, you know the the role that he is expected to have played Um, you know in these times and also, you know who invited gulak to the state Who was meant to has caught him to the airport, you know, and some of all those questions So quickly speak on the responsibility of the southeast governors and where they may have gone well or failed Okay, do you know that those who killed gulak I know it might not even have known On or it might not have known who he was A lot of people have been killed in south east in the last one week So gulak might just have been another of those victims. So I wanted to be careful not to not to um Spin conspiracy theories around this assassination If it were a country where we where we had a very good police force effective You probably investigate and get rid of them at that south east governors at this point need to come together It's not about Uh, pdc versus apc that about us on dimma versus gulak But they need to come together because what is going on there? It's it's mind-boggling If he stands now was killed in prodigy like I think I saw the video So these dead are becoming too Too frequent. So they need To tighten the security they need to work together as a unit I wouldn't expect anybody to sit down in the school's office and begin to say why did they come gulak had They try to go to anywhere who sent him it It's immaterial what he went to do there is immaterial He could have gone on a private business. He could have gone on a political summit. That's not the issue The issue is that the security situation is worse than the south east and the government is going to talk about it The earlier the face reality to come together And and and tackle that issue the better not to be in putting motive into Who killed him who was supposed to escort him anything could happen And gulak's life is not in any way more important than the other life that have been lost So I I want us to look at the issue would you say clay in terms of Insecurity in the south east we don't necessarily singular any individual. Yeah Okay, so another story here is about that people have been killed Okay, another story here on the punch newspaper also on the guardian newspaper Is saying that nan's national association of nine john students have declared june 12 a day of protest and they're basically saying they're what they're going to protest against the worsening insecurity of in Nigeria the kidnap in the banditry Kidnap of over 200 students in in ninjas state. So they're saying June 11th would be a day for students prayers They'll offer prayers for all the students who have lost their lives Junts however be a national day of peaceful protest and call on the government to act and you know proactively And create a strategy towards ensuring safer schools That what's the essence of or why are they celebrating democracy when many students and the den of kidnappers? This is this is a story here. What do you think about him? Mr. Kimmola? Okay my Question to nuns would be what is the average age? Of the criminals in Nigeria actually i'm robbers Bandits kidnappers was the average age They are youths So the protest is good But more importantly nuns will sensitize youth in Nigeria to stay away from crime Over 80 percent of criminal uses in Nigeria have been perpetrated by young people in the early 20s teenagers So nuns should find a way of getting involved in the various security arrangements Because the protest will come and go in security will remain Um So the protest is one thing that they can do more importantly. They need to get involved vigilance activities orientation reorientation Are youths have completely lost hope and confidence themselves that they embrace crime at the drop of the heart So I do not know what that protest will achieve I I I I I do not see it as anything that's going to be effective It's going to be yet another protest Beyond the protest I respect nuns leadership to find a way of coming up with Activities that will help youth to reduce their criminal tendencies Okay, that's nice you. All right. Mr. Addimola akimola publisher the podium media We appreciate you for making time to join us this morning on off the press on the breakfast All right. Thank you so much. Have a beautiful Wednesday ahead. Um, just was going to quickly mention the nuns president is not necessarily a youth but We are where we are Stay with us. What happened on this day in history the second of june. I'm talking something Sports related if you remember one of the most popular Presidents of FIFA we'll talk about him a little bit this morning And uh, something that came as close to being as deadly as the coronavirus outbreak in Africa in 2020


You know, it's inarguable the Apollo missions were, you know, if there is a sort of archetype of smart private public partnerships, amazing public policy, I think, you know, I think very few people would dispute it successfully because, you know, the mission was accomplished. But I suppose I've got a question which is to what extent is it transferable to various contexts. So you can see how that works in a sort of geopolitical rivalry context. You know, there's the United States and the Soviet Union, you're trying to get somewhere first. But in something like housing, you know, there are entrenched interests which don't really want to solve the housing crisis, because the status quo suits them, or perhaps more, you know, sort of easily understood, you know, climate change, there are massive hydrocarbon companies, there are massive consumer lobbies or even, you know, the car lobby taxi, you know, taxis in London are a major sort of actually London cab basically want to be a price cartel. There are major interests, which you might agree with them, you might disagree with some of them. But that's a bit different to the Apollo missions in so much as it's about competing interests rather than, you know, all of us want this one thing, let's push towards it together because that doesn't necessarily hold for climate change or for elderly care of the housing crisis, does it? Yes, I mean, the book is not trying to unpick everything. What it's saying is we have lots of money out there being spent by governments in terms of procurement. By the way, procurement is a huge percentage of government budgets, you know, like in the UK, the whole innovation budget across government is 10 billion, just the procurement budget of the Ministry of Transport is close to 40 billion. So four times the whole innovation budget across the government. So if you can transform things that governments are already doing, innovation policy budgets, industrial strategy budgets, procurement SME, small, medium enterprise financing, and transform it to be more purpose oriented, that's sort of what the book is really focusing on. However, I also spent a lot of time throughout the book from the beginning to the end, reminding the reader that the kind of challenges we have today, which I do think we should always remember, that we signed up to the SDGs, the 17 sustainable development goals, which brought broadly defined some of the biggest challenges we have around poverty, around climate, around gender parity and so on.  They're much more, they're much harder than going to the moon. That's why a colleague of mine, a wonderful academic at Columbia University, Richard Nelson, back in the 70s, he wrote a book called The Moon and the Ghetto, you know, basically saying, hold on a second, we just got to the moon and back and we still have ghettos. Why? And the answer is very deep. You know, partly we just haven't treated with the same level of urgency or social problems.  Fundamentally, a lot of the, again, issues that I talked about in the book about public-private, that's not a technical thing. That's about the social compact. Who negotiates that? So yes, it's hard, but I do think that the mission-oriented approach, focus more on that word, not so much on the moonshot, and I, in some ways I regret using that word because of how it was then bastardized in the UK and Dominic Cummings had actually brought me into Downing Street a year ago saying, love your stuff, we want to do it. I was like, uh-oh. I mean, they had already started designing their own way and I kept saying, hold on, hold on, you're doing it wrong. But you know, this concept of the moonshot makes one just kind of think potentially that this is a deterministic, technocratic, you know, just spend a lot of money on science and somehow we're going to solve problems. That's not at all what I'm arguing. What I'm arguing is we need to put our social problems at the center of how we design our economy, our society. We need to treat it with a level of urgency. We need leaders who prioritize it and it can actually talk about it in really ambitious ways.  Yeah, that's a good start. Then tell us what else you're going to do. But at least start with that, right? It's not just going to be about a carbon tax. What's interesting is that if you unpick all those different types of policies that I mentioned already exist because the book is not actually about saying we need to spend more. It's about spend completely differently and that's differently. We probably also have to invest a lot more, but, you know, focus on the goals. So climate change is SDG 14 or life below water is SDG 13. If you can transform these broad challenges into really concrete goals like this by the way these examples I'm giving you are in this report that I wrote before writing the book for Europe, arguing the European Commission that we needed a mission oriented approach. It was voted on by the Parliament and the European Council. So now missions are now a legal instrument within the European Commission to help direct innovation policy. Oops, sorry, towards big goals. Those types of very concrete, sorry, those broad challenges need to be rendered more concrete like we're going to have 100 carbon neutral cities across a region or we're going to get 90% of the plastic out of the ocean. And the key point I'm saying is don't think of this as just a public or a private thing a don't think of it as just a sectoral area right this isn't just about renewable energy say with climate. If you're going to have a carbon neutral city you're going to need investment innovation new collaborations and real estate and energy and mobility systems and construction materials and the social sector and food and so on. The main challenge, you know, and it is a bit of a nitty gritty point so maybe some you know some people might say alright this is boring but to me it is about changing capitalism redesign everything government does to foster that bottom up innovation to fuel activity towards that goal. Now the fact that it also requires new incentives including tax right we're still taxing today materials, less than we tax labor right if you want to reduce the material content of our economy which is central to actually reducing our carbon emissions, the tax system can help you incentivize that. If you have capital gains tax as low as it is right now what is that incentivizing short term ism right you can just make money quickly by buying and selling existing assets if you want to foster long term ism the business sector you need to again have a tax system that has things like the financial transaction tax but also within capital gains is rewarding those who keep their investments for a longer time say 10 years not just two years. The tax system is really central in all the social problems that we have, but that doesn't mean that we don't need an investment pathway and a new design of public private partnerships and serious capability within government so they don't just outsource their brains to the private sector. And of course we need a private sector that is less financialized the topic of my previous book, but even that why would that happen we need incentives for that. You know one of the reasons why we ended up back in the day with an extremely innovative private sector laboratory called Bell Labs many books have been written about Bell Labs it was fundamental to the IT revolution. Globally is government actually created an incentive for AT&T at the time to retain their monopoly status they had to to retain that contract, reinvest their profits into the real economy into innovation and big innovation beyond telecoms. Bell Labs was the answer. Imagine today if we had that you know if we had requirements that any company whether it's big pharmaceutical companies or big energy companies and so on that receive public benefits, whether it's a patent, which by the way is a contract that government gives you for 20 years or accessing public resources like in the United States $40 billion a year is given basically to the ecosystem of health innovation for the private sector to benefit from. Imagine if all of that kind of public subsidy public investment public bailouts which we have more and more of were conditional on profits a being reinvested back into the economy as opposed to extract it out to the financial sector and be invested towards helping you know really important goals be met the green transition but also more inclusive economy in terms of you know treat your workers well pay your tax and so on. And that's where I think covid's been so refreshing in some ways as tragic as it still is. We've seen some countries be much more ambitious in terms of the conditionalities on the bailouts we didn't see this with the financial crisis so France has created conditions for both the auto and the airline industry to access recovery funds if they reduce their carbon emissions so airlines and autos. Denmark and Austria have put conditions on you can't use tax havens. If you're going to access recovery funds. Elizabeth Warren in the US was arguing that companies receiving recovery funds wouldn't be able to just use you know their funds on share buybacks which you might know have just escalated massively in the last decade for trillion dollars have been used by the top global companies just to buy back their shares to boost stock options and executive pay. Anyway sorry I'm rambling a bit but none of these dysfunctions in our capitalist system like ultra financialization or inevitable they've been allowed to happen create conditionalities in order to really foster the building back better or the stakeholder capitalism agenda that the world economic forum likes to talk about that is not going to happen if it's just up to one's own free will it has to be nested within the design of the partnerships in the ecosystem. And interestingly the Apollo program has you know lessons on that it wasn't about the technology necessarily it was about the partnership.


This is covering the spread part of the fan dual podcast network It is a massive day in major league baseball because today is the opening day of all four Divisional series across major league baseball. It's gonna be a delight We're gonna break things down from a strikeout prop perspective with Rob Friedman pitching Ninja getting his thoughts on today's games And we'll take our first look at week six to get you set for the NFL as well This is covering the spread right here on the fan dual podcast network and number fire.com My name is Jim Saunders. I am a senior writer and analyst for number fire com joined here once again by Rob Friedman Check him out on Twitter at pitching Ninja. He is on MLB. He's on Fox Nessin and peacock and Rob. It's the opening day of the divisional series I feel like you've got to be jacked right now. How you doing? I am jacked It's the morning though Like I'm just getting around to getting ready for the games getting psyched up gradually because I don't want to peek But the problem is the game started one like you don't got a lot of time to ramp up like It's the Braves in a minute Lana, I've got I know but if I if I if I get too fired up now I'll be petered out by one and certainly by the whatever the late game is Yeah, 937 p.m. Eastern is the the Dodgers Padres game. I'm I'm old man Like that's 937 is when I start to prepare for bed typically so they're pushing it this year Oh, yeah, totally agree and and like they don't understand like how tough this is for me like I so one one to midnight is 11 hours of you Chopping up, you know clips at least not like 16 games one at once You get some commercial breaks and stuff like that in there, but like that's all that's all stretched out schedule I should consider things over there. It is. It's tough being me You know watching all these games and putting them on social media and stuff like yeah Everybody out there feel sorry for me. I think they consider the gifts guys like let's go. Come on Let's let's I mean you you do stuff for MOB like I just put in the word, you know I just say hey by the way Consider the ninja at some times. Yeah, the problem is then they'll do them all at one time and that's worse for me Like it's definitely worse because I'll be sitting there going. Oh my god Like I have to flip between screens like no matter what I'm gonna wine And I shouldn't wine because I get to watch baseball all day and there's nothing better than that So I'm excited. It's gonna be a great day of of baseball and let's go. So let's talk about it Let's talk about that great day of baseball We're talking about your pitching props for today in a second But first of all to talk to you because strikeout props are always lower this time of year It's in part because like you're facing good teams and they grind out at bats But also pitch counts are tough to pin down That's the issue I've been having is I get very nervous about betting K props this time of year because it's hard to know It seems like it's kind of a mentality thing though both by the team and the pitcher So what are you kind of using to judge? How long do you think a guy will go in a game when you're making these strikeout recommendations? That is a great Point and a lot of times it's a balance like I I like a pitcher who's been there a pitcher That that's a horse with a bullpen that they kind of want to make sure they don't overextend early So it's like you have to guess and all the best guess is like this is tough and You know for folks out there Yeah I watch a lot of baseball and a lot of baseball like I probably watch more pitchers than anybody Around yeah, and it doesn't mean you're gonna be right because there's so many variables and this is one big one like there are teams That just don't K They grind out at bats. I thought the I mean I thought the Mets had some great at bats in the last series I think you know Cleveland's always got got a good approach at the plate That doesn't mean anything if they're facing a Pitcher that's still going at them But it's something you have to keep in mind and and and also do teams want to get to hand it off to the bullpen early Get a win or they're gonna ride their horse and say yeah I think it's just point to keep in mind as you open up Fandall Sportsbook you check out the strikeout numbers They're gonna feel low when you look at them But that's for a reason and that's because of the things you just mentioned So just keep that in mind when you look at them. Don't just you know make sure you keep that in mind So let's open up the board for you Rob when you look at the Pitching props available for today at Fandall Sportsbook, which ones do you feel confident in based on the combination of factors? We just discussed. Yeah based on the combination of factors I'm going Garrett Cole six K's or more and then I'm gonna do a same game parlay with furlander for seven K's or more And Logan Gilbert for four K's or more and I think that all those guys are Horses, you know, we've seen these guys go deep in games throughout the year Cole went like 120 pitches at one point verlander We know he can go deep hasn't done it a ton this year But I think that was in part because they had October in mind for him I want to start things off here with verlander facing over the Mariners That's a that's a pretty tough lineup But I think that the the the big thing there is Especially the second half of the year verlander turned into a higher strikeout pitcher than he was the first half What led to that search for him, you know, that's a great question. It's hard to tell I just thought he looked very very sharp and locked in probably wanted to drive home the Cy Young Award Maybe was yeah, yeah being healthy coming back saying this is the stretch run I'm gonna I want to carry this team to the World Series. I you know, I'm in a Cy Young race I want to win that he wants to win everything and that's Verlator in this like that's why I feel good about that number is he's been really sharp and Dude is a competitor and I know he just wants to show his stuff in this game And he's shown that stuff throughout the entire year. We know what Max or what just a legend. Yeah, he's a legend He's been fantastic And I think that that side of the game. It's easy to have a lot of faith in there now Logan Gilbert not as proven in the postseason, but I'm actually on board with you I was gonna ask you about Logan Gilbert in the alternate market for him to get five plus strikeouts is plus 172 You've got him at four plus, which is minus 140 right now at Bandual sports book part of the reason why the counterpoint to mine is that the Seattle bullpen is sick and You could see a case where they're like, okay, we don't want him going too far in games But Gilbert, I mean, I don't care about like, you know, what he did against the Astros in the regular season He was sick. He was very good in those matches. That doesn't hurt things and also it seemed like recently Kind of a little bit more strikeout juice. He's got that competitive nature So I got on and because of the way he pitched down the stretch and having faith in him in this matchup What put you on Gilbert for today? I think a lot of it's that so what I was torn for torn by with with Gilbert is The line between getting keyed up and wanting to dominate and getting too key Yeah, and and like he he is talk about a competitor that dude breaks out a whole different personality when he's on the bomb And sometimes it works out really well and other times, you know If you can get over keyed up and I'm I'm hoping that he's been through this season enough that he knows exactly how Hype he needs to get. Yeah, but yeah, he absolutely can you know can can Kay a bunch of folks He can touch, you know upper 90s with his fastball and and when he's pitch when he's on He's he's tough. So yeah, like It's a crap shoot like I was wondering the same thing That's why I was a little bit lower with the 4ks on him because he could you know, he could K7 or 8 You don't know and and the bullpen. Yeah, and the bullpen things loaded So do you want to hand it off or did I want to make sure if you shoot it all at once? You know, do you have that bullpen later in the series? Maybe you want to let him go a little longer, right? It's a tough balance for sure And I think that that's that's a concern with him But I think that I have faith in the pitcher and it's the other factors that could give you pause But I think that's why I was on Gilbert person. Let's talk about Garrett Cole You mentioned that that Guardians team how disciplined they are with having good played appearances and making sure they are Making that pitcher work. They're putting the ball in play. They've got a lot of guys with a contact type profile What does Garrett Cole do that better positions him to get strikeouts against that lineup? What most guys do to me it's a combination of his experience. So he is your horse. He is an elite pitcher in the major leagues I know he's up and down sometimes with you know performance stuff But I know he wants it too. Yeah, and having a guy like that to lead off set the tone He knows how important that is he is a pitcher that even if you're trying to make contact he throws so hard and has such good stuff. I don't know that it matters and You know, that's the flips I like it could be Cleveland Just they try to grind out at bats the whole game, but is that going to be effective against, you know, 99 100? It might not be I mean it's not to be effective against I care like you said There can be times where let's some home runs and stuff like that But even in those games the strikeouts are typically still there So the before the three leg parlay for Rob here Logan Gilbert four plus strikeouts individual leg there minus 140 Justin Verlander seven plus strikeouts individual leg there plus 118 Then Cole six plus strikeouts minus 172 for a combined three leg parlay of plus 468 over at fangirls sportsbook and Rob, I think even if these don't hit we're still winners We get to watch Justin Verlander. We get to watch Garrett Cole. We get to watch Max Freed on the bump today So that's a that's a good day of baseball and I'm excited to see how it all goes And we just get to talk baseball so we're winners automatically like just doing this we're winners I could I golly more. I could not agree more That is Rob Freeman check him out on Twitter at pitching ninja find his work at MLB Fox Nessun and peacock Rob enjoy today get some coffee breaks in you know get some food in you at some points to to try to marathon this whole thing and Looking forward to talking to you again some pointer in this postseason. Well, it's been great as always Yeah, I'm cooking ribs during the game. So this should be fun. Yeah, good day. Okay That'll help with making it 11 hours and having ribs on the ribs available to you. Totally. Alrighty. Thank you, Rob Enjoy the baseball for today Alrighty, that was Rob Freeman check him out on Twitter at pitching ninja and watch some fantastic gifts and some fantastic Baseball throughout the day for today. We're gonna break down my first look at NFL week number six here in just one second But first quick reminder to make sure you are subscribed to covering the spread wherever you get your podcasts You of course are an Apple podcast Spotify Stitcher Google podcasts You name it you can find us there and while you're there if you like what you hear Leave us a rating and review as well Twisted tea and fangal join force to bring you a one-of-a-kind contest series It gives you a chance to compete for your share of thousands of dollars in site credit introducing twisted tea is college football picks a Sports betting focused contest series that's entirely free to play the contest is simple Each college football game will be assigned money line a spread and total markets with assigned points to each market All you have to do is make six selections based on those three markets and their points for each correct Selection you made that the end of the day your score ranks among the best in the contest You will be eligible for your share of site credit head to fangal.com Twisted tea picks and make your picks and reminder Please drink Responsibly let's dig in here to NFL week number seven week number seven Who kind of jump ahead week number six here and break down where my numbers are showing value Across fangal sports book one of these is one that has been a bit on the move Throughout this morning as potentially a reaction to last night That is a cheese taste facing off against the Buffalo Bills and right now over at fangal You can't get the cheese plus three that is minus one fourteen I'm showing value there, but also I think I'd kind of rather go with the cheese money line that's plus one thirty right now at fangal sports book and I want that My numbers actually the chief should be favored in this game by one point four nine points so four point four nine points deviant what the market says and That is my model that can that combines a preseason prior with what teams have done so far this year I'm also running alter alternate model right now that does look at just 2022 It's not my betting model, but it's one that I want to look at to kind of judge. Okay Am I underreacting to what we've seen so far this year by that model the bills should be favored That's fair because they're the best in football based on that 2020 only model But it's only by point two one points and that's what gives me more faith in going with the cheese money line Once again at plus one thirty obviously the cheese just played a huge game on monday night They had to you know press for that entire game Whereas the bills got to coast for like the final three quarters of sunday now they go to kent city I think that those factors do favor the bills Do they favor them enough to get this money line to plus one thirty and make me feel good about Backing the bills in this one. No, I want to go with the chiefs here both my models aligned and saying the chiefs are undervalued So to me the first bet I'm locking in week number six will be the cheese money line Plus one thirty against the bills in that game in kent city We could see that number could keep on moving because it was plus one eighteen this morning Um, so you could see more movement, but honestly if you want the plus three, I'd probably get that now I there's no chance. I don't think we get three and a half Maybe hold off you want the money line, but personally plus one thirty. I'm ready to fire and we'll take that there I think that is Further than it should have gone based on what we've seen so far from these two teams another money line At like four this week is actually on another island game That is the thursday night game Potentially the grossest game the entire week that is the commanders at the bears and the commander's money line right now Is plus 104 and I will be willing to take that right now on the commander side of plus 104 obviously Bad vibes that the commanders right now. We saw that ron Rivera press conference yesterday talking about how The quarterback was the reasoning their team had had struggled But my number said the commanders favored by 1.56 in this game. The spread is at one point I want the money line here to get the commanders at plus 104 And if I again turn to that 2022 only model so focusing on The commanders this year with karsten wenz that says they should be favored by 1.4 points And again, they're underdogs in this game slight dogs, but dogs nonetheless so similar to the cheese one The betting model that I use the one that combines a prior with what we've seen so far this year It says the commander should be favored and the 2022 only model says they should be favored as well So again, I like it when those two were in agreement. I'm not leaning a ton on the 2022 only model It's kind of more of a check with me kind of thing to make sure I'm not overreacting to or underreacting to certain stuff And when they bolt the line, I will take that So commanders plus 104 the bears won around the football but the commanders pretty good against that rank They rank third against the rush based on my number. So They should be pretty able to Keep the bears very good rushing offense and check and that gives me faith in plugging them at plus 104 against chicago So cheese plus 130 bears plus 104 the other one is uh one. I am delighted to get to talk about and that is betting against a team that has Giving me a lot of extra gray hairs so far this year. Uh, that's the arizona cardinals I finally get to bet against them that money line for seattle on the opposing side of that game Is plus 120 So we're getting seattle here as Home underdogs against an arizona team that has been Dysfunctional so far this year now. I do have a downgrade in seattle For rashad penny being out Obviously, you don't see a lot of running backs who truly truly moved the needle penny has been that like his rushing efficiency Has been off the charts both last year in this year. So not having rashad penny in this game Does negatively impact seattle for me But kenneth walker Very good Early down back based on what you showed in michigan state had a huge touchdown run last week I think it is partly infrastructure in seattle penny was great But like they have a good infrastructure in place. It's still allowed them to be good even with no rashad penny. So I think the offense will still be fine. Uh, the priors Model that I have here does favor seattle by point three oh points in this game So plus 120 in the money line it has moved. So I would get this one now if you want to bet it Because I think that it is moving towards seattle's direction the 2022 only model heavily favors seattle here. So Again alignment between those two. So I will go to seattle plus 120 against arizona And I would get that one now because I think that one will continue to shift towards The seahawks in this game one other one i'm I'm gonna do but i'm less confident in than the other ones is a cowboy's money line at plus 190 Against the eagles. I've got the cowboys at 37.7 percent to win this game. They're implied odds are 34.5 percent but that's what the cowboys being Moderately, I think that I'm kind of low on them in my numbers, but still showing a bit of value here. I've been hesitant to React to cooper rush playing. Well, obviously that could play. Uh, I don't I'm based on what I've heard this morning Based on what I've read. I don't think he's gonna play But like, you know, there's a shot he could play and that'd be an upgrade for sure but I'm assuming right now cooper rush would be the quarterback here and Obviously sunday was not a result of cooper rush didn't play that great the offense enough to do a whole lot to win that game I've been hesitant to top the cowboys in my number So I think that what I have for dallas right now is a fairly conservative estimation of what their offense will be Under cooper rush against this eagles eagles defense But i'm still showing a bit of value on their money line at plus 190 so if you were asking me to to Rattle off my level of confidence in each of these money lines I would say the cowboys are last still willing to do it, but they are last for me I would say seattle's probably the one I had the most confidence in uh plus 120 against arizona I would say cheese plus 130 against the bills is next up uh, uh, and then uh I go commanders thirst because it's hard to have a lot of faith in a team quarterback by karson wenz so My favorite bet so far this week is seattle plus 120 I would go to the cheese next plus 130 against bills or plus plus three if you want to go that route instead Then the commanders plus 104 and then the cowboys Plus 190 against the eagles. I took it but I understand if you don't want to go that route because It's hard to justify betting against the eagles with how they've been playing so far this year There are some other spots where i'm showing value, but i'm not going to bet it at least as of now I'm showing value in the steward's money line plus 300 against the bucks lesson learned not a huge gap I'm not gonna Go at that one there. So i'm passing at the steward's right now I'm showing value of the patriots plus three in their game against cleveland I kind of want to see what mac jones status is because I'm not sure how big of a downgrade I would make it to be bailey zappy for this game, but I kind of want to have more clarity in the situation I think of the ones that i'm not betting yet That's the one that i'm most willing to bite on later on this week depending where the markets go so holding off For where that one is right now On the patriots plus three against the browns. I've shown value in the panthers money line at plus 385 against the rams I have a downgrade in there for pj walker, but like also wolf um I get the rams have not looked good, but yikes, uh yikes buddy. I've had Bad selection this year if I look at all the the money lines are my numbers have shown value I've you know, it's uh a decent roi But I haven't taken a lot of the ones that have had the best returns. Maybe this is one where i'm like Okay, I can't bet this and it winds up cashing. I don't care. I I don't want I don't want to bet this carolina team right now on the money line plus 385 I will pass there the final one where i'm showing value that i'm not betting right now is the giant's money line at Plus 190 against ravens the reason i'm not going here is I think that my model is a bit too low on the ravens It's not a huge gap between what my numbers have and what the market has So that's why i'm a bit hesitant there now the 2022 only model which I think is Is a better judge Of the ravens and then my priors model that one does still show value in the giant said plus 190, but um, you know So both my numbers my models do align and saying the giants are value here I don't quite feel good enough about it though to actually fire. So I'll hold off there. So the ones i'm i'm officially recommending for today Are the chiefs plus 130 money line commanders money line plus 104 the seahawks money line plus 120 and the cowboys money line Plus 190 against eagles less confident in that one But still one i am willing to ride with here on tuesday, of course We'll have more thoughts on this week six sleigh, which is a really fun one coming up on thursday Their full betting breakdown and then on friday while jg's accuracy on talk player props as well Let's now dig into our recap of last week as we do each and every week here on covering the spread Starting the college side and had a couple I think that is uh found them on twitter at power rank Couple bets on tcu kansas and it depends on when you got those because when we talked it was tcu minus seven The total was 68 and a half. I had like tcu minus seven and the over at 68 and a half I was actually able to get tcu minus six and a half after we spoke. Uh, I believe they got that on late wednesday it was six and a half It did get to seven and a half at one point So clearly once it got six and a half money came in on tcu Once it got seven and a half money came in on kansas and it went back to seven and it closed there Total closed at 70 and a half So I cashed tcu minus six and a half because they finished at seven exactly ed pushed on minus seven I feel pretty lucky to win that one with jill and daniels getting banged up. Um Obviously they still played very well without him. Um, and you know, it wasn't lighting things up there so I feel pretty lucky to have cashed that bet but uh Still a nice read by ed there ed got the over at 68 and a half to finish with 69 So hopefully you got there before that total got up to 70 and a half to get the over on that one But at 68 and a half ed got that one and then had the push on tcu minus seven if you got a six and a half You got the win there as well Uh, but overall I think a pretty good day for add on the college side of things On the nfl side pretty mixed week for me the stupid cardinals finally paid off I got them a plus five and a half They did cover that they lost by three and I said on tuesday The reason I was going with the cardinals plus five and a half as opposed to the money line was because I didn't want to risk cliff kingsbury Messing up my money with a laking decision Turns out it was kyler murray. I had to worry about not cliff kingsbury But hey didn't worry that much as long as they didn't go to ot and give up a touchdown I was going to be okay, and that's how things played out. They missed the field goal So did get the cardinals plus five and a half I pushed on the vikings minus seven, but I also had them in a two leg teaser with the bucks That was the bug the vikings minus one bucks minus two and a half We talked on tuesday the vikings one by seven bucks one by five That was minus 134 for the two leg teaser That went pretty well there Obviously they didn't play as well as I thought they might but Still, uh, that's why we do teasers every now and then again They're not a huge part for me just because I need to have value in both sides Uh, it's in tb only to bet it but um, that one did work out there I had the bangles plus 150 on the money line So I actually did like zack taylor going for the touchdown on fourth down I thought that that was the best route to potentially winning that game I seem to be alone in that which is fine, uh, but As someone who won the bangles to win based on my betting interest. I actually thought it was an okay decision So personally, I was on board with it didn't work out. They didn't cover plus three did not get the money line for me Uh, but I still feel good about the way they played that game. I still feel good about the bet It didn't quite cash on that one. I had the dolphin's money line at minus 178 That was pretty dead early with the teddy bridge water injury the jets played well against the dolphin's defense too so honestly, even if teddy hadn't gotten hurt, I'm not sure if I would have won that bet but You know circumstances out of the out of the control there I don't think it was a bad bet. I don't think I deserved to win it Even if teddy had been healthy, but I didn't win it either way On thursday, I had a couple bets here on the show. We were talking with ryan I had a stealers money line at plus 640 close at plus 610, but closing line value. Don't pay the bills with the way that game Went down. They got toast. That's why I didn't want the spread at plus 14 because I knew that a A romp was well within the range of outcomes I think that the money line was the preferred way to go there. Um, didn't cash either way, but I still think that the The unwillingness to bet the spread I feel good about spending the money line, you know closing on value et cetera, et cetera, but whatever that one is how it was other one. I had a thursday was the chargers I said thursday I wanted to wait and so after kina now and got ruled out and myles garrett was ruled a to bet that one because I thought there would be movement towards the Browns after that that did happen a money line was minus 120 saturday when I got that Spread was minus one and a half then as well Both those cashed uh barely But got a better price on the money line if you waited and a better number on the spread as well And if you had gotten it two and a half, which it was thursday would not have cash, which is why Getting a read on which way you think the markets will go is obviously very important and That's why I was willing to wait on the chargers there and uh take them later on So luckily I did because that did help me out quite a bit there then last night a split ticket for me I had josh jacob's over 18 and a half receiving yards and jerry mckinnon under 25 and a half rushing plus receiving he had 30 on one run. Um That was a very tilting run and then he looked good so they kept going him So Unders can be frustrating to sweat because you're like, okay, they could still burn me late in the game I'm winning this right now. Etc. Etc. But if they go over in the second quarter, who cares? So yeah, at least I lost that one early jacob's though that one He almost doubled that total so next week overall, I feel pretty good about the way things went I feel okay about the way my numbers are back testing I'm glad that I have this alternate model right now that I'm running with 2022 only numbers again Not betting based on that one but kind of using it as a check uh to see if I'm going the right direction with things And I think that will help us in the long run Ryan williams find him on twitter at ryanowns underscore underscore w great game last night to spend a profit week He was two and four on sunday, uh, but really sick monday for ryan He did miss on the derrick uh derrick car to throw a pick which is minus one or two miss the cheese minus seven and a half miss the cheese Teen total over 31 and a half, but uh, you also to anytime touchdown azea pacheco plus 210 But the big one hitting for ryan was travis kelsey to score twice at plus 600 He did it four times. So he doubled that one up He also cash patrick mahomes over two and a half passing touchdowns of plus 132 He had travis kelsey over six and a half receptions, which was minus 120 And kelsey got seven he had like 25 yards, but at seven catches so A two and four sunday for ryan, but a profitable week based on most of that kelsey double touchdown game And the mahomes over two and a half passing touchdowns the kelsey reception one. He also had the josh jacob's Receiving yardage number over 18 and a half So good week by ryan, especially on monday to close things out player props show on Friday jay jazak recent also talked about josh jacob's he had 154 yards rushing 39 receiving and a touchdown. So Any market you went to for josh jacob's buddy cashed. He was awesome in that one other one for jj was damian pierce He mentioned in in the situations to monitor. He had 99 yards rushing 14 yards receiving so The situations to target section has been a very good one to jj so far this year We talked about remando stevenson there earlier on this year. It's been a very good section So if you're listening on friday, I think that although we give like yardage and touchdown recommendations I'd listen those closely to the situations to target one because that's been a really good read by jj overall this year Uh, oh and two on touchdown bets and one for three on yardage bets alan robinson under 39 and a half receiving yards Did hit there a j dylan passing yardage and nick chubb receiving yardage AJ dylan receiving nick chubb receiving yardage both those numbers went under AJ didn't got a a roll reduction sunday. It seemed like they lean more on erin jones So didn't get the dylan one shoveling one target was early on He went under seven and a half receiving yards But the situations to target section been really good one to tune in to so far this year. So Hopefully you're able to get in on uh, josh shake ups and damian pierce taking vanjo and jj was saying on those We of course do have jj back once again this friday We got ed fang and ben stevens on tomorrow to talk some college football as well that show should be up Probably around 2 p.m. Eastern or so tomorrow Over on the covering the spread podcast feed and it'll be up on the fandal youtube page after that as well Thursday showed a preview week number six Ryan will be out for that because he has to unpack Just moving into his new apartment So while someone else there on thursday to help me break down Biggest games of this week get all those shows as they are posted by subscribing to covering the spread wherever You get your podcasts and also check out the fandal youtube page To get these as they go up there each and every week big Thank you once again to rob freeman for coming on not just today But all throughout this entire second half of the mlb season check out rob on twitter at pitching ninja Find his work at mlb fox neson and peacock and uh, see if we can get those strikeout props in for rob for today as well If you have any questions for me, I am on twitter at gymsonus J i m s a n n e s you can also follow the fandal podcast network at fandal podcast Big thank you to everyone for tuning in for today. Good luck to you with your mlb bets for today Good luck to you with your week six bets. We'll talk to you once again tomorrow to break down some college football This has been covering the spread right here on the fandal podcast network


Now, Hicks is looking at the third base coach. He's taking in the signs, understanding what's getting put on. Henderson saw the sign, and he's gonna take off as the pitcher goes and gets thrown out. And look at him, look back at the dugout here, look back at Hicks and be like, what? What's going on? And what the fuck? Oh, Hyde's upset. Henderson's still looking back like, what? That's not cool, man. But on the other side, Hyde, great throw. He's fired up. Let's go.


Hey guys, so my name is Tuman Chen, I'm a software engineer at Red Hat and today I'm going to talk briefly about multi-tenancy and Ironic. So quickly, what is multi-tenant Ironic? Well, Ironic was originally designed for admin only use. Multi-tenant Ironic simply means we allow non-advance to have selective API access to particular nodes. What's the motivation? Well, I work with an initiative called Elastic Secure Infrastructure, or ESI, which is an initiative started by the Massive and Cloud or MOC. It works on several projects, but one question I was trying to answer was, if you're in an organization with a bare-mail cloud, what do you do during periods of inactivity within your bare-mail cloud? Well, one answer that they proposed was that multiple organizations actually collaborate together and donate hardware into a single bare-mail cloud, which has hardware belonging to multiple owners. In that cloud, owners have exclusive use of their nodes, but owners can also choose to allow Elastic to gain temporary access to one of their nodes. So you can imagine if you're a research institution with a bare-mail cloud and you share your hardware with other research institutions, you still have exclusive use of your hardware whenever you need it. But during periods of downtime, you can donate use of your hardware to other research institutions and during moments when maybe you need a little bit more, you might be able to find that hardware from other organizations. So when ESI decided to go ahead with this project, we talked to the upstream ironic dev team about how we might implement this in ironic. And they were very helpful in helping us come up with a series of implementation steps and writing up a spec. So the implementation is actually pretty straightforward. The first thing we did is we updated nodes to have owner and legacy fields, and actually ironic nodes that already had the owner field, but it was purely informational. Next, we exposed owner and legacy fields to policy. And in OpenStack, policy just means it's a set of roles that determines whether a user's API request is going to be accepted or rejected. So by exposing owner and legacy fields to policy, we can add two new roles, isNodeOwner and isNodeLessie, which is a person making this API request the owner of this node or the legacy of this node. Policy roles can be chained together. So with those two roles in place, we can now do things like updated bare-mail node updates to allow the API request to go through if the requesting user is an admin or is the owner of the node. Similarly, for bare-mail node set power states, we can say that this API request is okay if the user is an admin or the owner of the node or the legacy of this node. By default, in ironic, the default policy roles still shuts off API access for not admins. So in order to enable this, you would have to modify your policy file, but that's a very, very straightforward process. And really, that's most of the implementation. That's really the bulk of it. There are a few additional details we worked through. One was, we discovered that if you want to provision a node using standalone ironic, you need to be able to update the nodes extra and instance of the fields. If you're a lessie, so one way of doing this would be to grant non-admin users the ability to update the nodes fields.  So we added two additional policy roles for update policy roles specifically for the extra and instance info fields. Another thing we did is we exposed the node owner and lessie for associated bare mail port operations. So now non-admins can view bare mail ports and the bare mail ports associated with their nodes. And depending on the policy, they can also manage them, create or do other things with them. And then we also added node allocation owners.  And the allocation conductor, when it matches you with an ironic node, will only check ironic nodes that you either own or lease. So with these changes in place, we tested this out with MailSmith, the client-side Python library for provisioning object nodes. And we use a specific policy file, which you can see linked here. And we discovered that it just works for node owners and lessies with no other changes needed for MailSmith, which was kind of a validation of our approach. So I'm just going to take a quick step back and see how this work fits into the ESI hardware leasing system design. The proposed hardware leasing system principally consists of three services. One is a leasing service, which is kind of a new thing for us, which I'll talk about a little bit in a bit. There's a bare mail service, ironic, and networking service or neutron. And there's two main workflows going on here. One is a leasing workflow where owners can offer up their nodes into the leasing service, and then lessies can go into the leasing service and see what nodes are available and lease nodes for a period of time. Once the leasing begins, then the leasing service simply tells ironic, can you set the nodes lessie to the person leasing this node? And when the lease is over, ironic will unset the lessie and clean the node. The other workflow is the provisioning workflow, where owners and lessies can take the nodes that they own or lease and perform various provisioning actions. They can provision it using Mel Smith. If they have an external provisioning service, they can connect their nodes to that external provisioning service using neutron. They can power cycle the node, they can perform other actions. One thing I want to emphasize here is that the leasing workflow and the provisioning workflow are very, very distinct from each other. So if you're interested in the multi-tenant ironic work for provisioning, but you don't need a complicated leasing workflow, say you either want owners to designate lessies themselves, or you don't even have any for lessies. That's totally fine. You'll need any of that and you can still take advantage of multi-tenant ironic. Just some quick notes about some of the additional development we did that aren't directly ironic related for this hot releasing service. One is we added support for the Cisco Nexus switch and ML2 Ansible networking because that Cisco Nexus switch is what the MLC uses. We also found it useful to add some simplified user commands. And what that really means is that we extended the OpenStack CLI to combine multiple OpenStack commands together and discover it's a really simple process to do so. So in MLC, we created this really simple leasing service where, as I said, owners can offer up unused nodes for specified time periods. Lessies can claim unused nodes and the lessies and the leasing service will take those thesis and tell I'm not able to deal with them. So what's next? First of all, we're currently deploying this hot releasing system into as a trial basis within the MLC. And we're going to get some trial users to test it out and the expectation is that their feedback will drive further development. Another thing we're working on is node attestation with KeyLime. KeyLime can talk to a piece of hardware's TPM module and the test of node, make sure it hasn't been tampered with, which is something that I think a lessie will be very interested in knowing. We also like support for non admins to be able to be the node with the volume, with suffice because you support in our case because of the requirements. In order to do so, we just need to expose node owner lessie for associated bare metal volume targets and connectors operations so that if you own or lease a node then you can create volume targets and connectors for it. After that, we just need to add additional update policies for specific roles. One is updating node capabilities and the other is updating a node storage interface. This is stuff that this code that we've actually already done, we've tested it works and we're just waiting for it to be reviewed. Finally, there's something that's a little bit longer term, which is FlockX bare metal marketplace. So the idea here is if when you think of ESI but in the marketplace model, an owner would not only offer up a node, they'll also set a price for the user nodes and then the lessie will come to the marketplace, see what nodes are available and what price and then actually purchase use of the hardware for whatever time they need. This is an idea of a couple of BU students as a graduate student project at Boston University. And if you're interested in more details, there's a link right there. If you're interested in further information, there's a ESI presentation and a demo on this YouTube link. If you're interested in our documentation or code, we have a repository. And if you'd like to talk to us or IRC about ESI then we can be found in FreeNode in the MOC channel. And that's my entire talk. Thank you.