There are hundreds of backroom's entities that are chronicled inside of the lore. Some of them are really cool, some of them are kind of goofy, and some of them are just dumb, to be honest. So in this video, I, Broogly, will be ranking these backroom's creatures and entities on a tier list, based on how much I like them, how cool they are, how cool they look, if they're well written, and how much they impact the lore. This list will be controversial, so I look forward to the war zone that'll be down in the comments below. Comment your tier list as well, I'm interested to see what you all have to say, maybe, I don't know if I should be, but let's hop into the ranking of all the backroom's entities. Alright, here is the tier list, my friends, actually you can't even see it, let me fix that. Alright, here is the tier list, friends, we are here on the tiermaker.com website once again, and we actually have more here than we did in the level video, and I kind of like that, because I've always been a huge fan of entities, if you didn't know, those are the first videos that everybody saw on this channel, if you're an OG, so I really am, I'm pretty excited to do this, and there's a huge selection of new and OG ones on this list, and I'm pretty, pretty excited to revisit these, if I'm being honest. Don't know all of these, I'm not really sure what some of these pictures are, but I do, I do know most of them, believe it or not, so sorry if I failed you, I apologize. Anyways, let's get into it right here, first off, with this entity, I think it's one of the, I think I don't remember the name, but I do actually like this one, B tier right off the bat, I love ones that kind of go with psychological effects, that's one, that is what this one's all about. Now, this next one is the horse, I think it's the immovable horse, the one that has the force field around it, I also really like this one, but not more than a B, I do, I do like it because it's kind of goofy, and I, I have a strange like appreciation for goofy, silly things in the back room, so I feel like the dumb things kind of add to it in a way, like some people think it detracts and takes away, I think it adds to it, it adds to the other worldliness. These are the, the kites, these are, these are okay, these are, they're not really the best, I don't really like the design that much, they're decent though. Now, this entity, I forgot its name, but it looks cool, and I think it's pretty dangerous, so I'm going to put it to C tier, not one of my favorites, like I said, I'm not going to remember all these off the bat because the names aren't on here, and I have so much lore crammed into my head that I can't remember them all. I do know this one, the level nine entity, see that right here, entity number 96, I love this creature, Neighborhood Watch, this is one of my favorites, Vault on, love the design, love how scary it is, and I love that it's on level nine, it's a pretty early level to have a scary entity on, and I'm glad that it's there, so we're going to put that in a solid A tier right off the bat. Alright, so this next one is the reality bug, I actually really like this one, this is a pretty cool one, its effects are very cool, and I also just like the idea of having really smart synthene bugs that kind of warp things, pretty cool, parasite, Paraly, I think, if I remember correctly, it's like this weird bacteria infection parasite type deal, and it slithers inside of you, pretty scary concept, not a big fan of snakes, I'll put it to C tier, I just because, oh man, this next one brings back the OG memory in me, that rhymed, I'm not going to speed pass it, that was really cool, anyways, these are the woodland entities, I think it's, I think it's woodland, yeah it's woodlands, I don't think these exist anymore, but they were entity 45 when they came out, and I absolutely love these creatures, pretty much they are like faces in the side of wood, and what they would do is they would psychological torment you, until eventually they sucked you into the wood wall, and just kept you there until you weren't alive, love this entity, not sure why they removed it, there could have been something behind the scenes, I don't know, I love this creature, for the creature aspect alone in the design, I'm giving it an S tier, it is the perfect example of an entity in the back rooms, next up of course, we have the Samantha entity, this is a cat that is very smart, speaks multiple languages and can talk to many people, love it, love this goofiness, I love it, it's just one of those things like I said earlier, it adds, it adds to the weirdness and that other worldliness, I love it, Samantha's going on an A tier, this is a lot of people's favorite entity in the back rooms, so if it's yours, good, good, it's up here, hi, it's not, I don't know what to tell you, next up we have, I think these are the photoshop entities, yes, I remember these, I remember these bro, I remember off the top of my head, these are really like psychologically tormental type of deals, I kind of like the design, pretty cool concept as well, yeah, that's saying a solid B tier is accurate, another good entity, especially for the concept of the infinite labyrinth of back rooms, we'll put it in A tier, the entity that you get trapped on if you walk on top of it, very cool, very OG, not sure what this one is, it looks like a hallway to me, maybe it's just like a living hallway, I don't know, it's not listed, we'll put it here at D, just because I don't know what it is, next up is Doll Faces, now Doll Faces, another OG creature, absolutely adore these, they were the first or second in the original Creatures video I made, so the nostalgia bone is getting tickled, anyways, that is definitely going for a solid A tier, very much loved that, these are light guides I believe, is that what it's called, they remember that, yes light guides, so I like light guides, they're in the Cygnus archive level, I like these, these are cool, we have no one really knows what they do, no one knows all their stuff, I kind of like that, so I'm going to put it in a B tier, probably above photoshop, next up is a very controversial one, a lot of people do not like these entities, these are facelings, a lot of people hate them, a lot of people think they're basic, a lot of people don't like them, and I don't like a lot of people, I'm putting this at an S tier, I think facelings embody the goofiness and weirdness of the back rooms, and I love it, I literally love the idea of having these creatures that have no face, no identity, no personality, just raw husks, running around, living in the back rooms is perfect, I love it so much, it's going for an S tier, under the, under the woodland though, now I wish my eyes weren't like trash, if I could see the, be kind of neat, I'm not really sure what this is, I think I remember like seeing this picture a while ago, okay yeah I don't know what this one is, I've never seen it before, also there's nothing that comes up on reverse image search, so we're just going to leave it, okay it seems to be the back room salesman apparently according to reddit from two years ago, I like that, I didn't know that existed, that's probably not on a website, but I like it, looks cool, put it in a solid C tier, also can't even see what this one is, let's go over here, is this the red knight, I think this is the red knight, I actually like the red knight, it's kind of overpowered, kind of overpowered a little bit, put it a B tier, red knight's pretty cool, I have a full short and a video on it, now we have the one of the hated most despised entities in all the back rooms, the death rat, and this entity is just like no very aggressive rat that attacks people and things, now I don't really like it that much and I know a lot of people don't either, so I'm actually going to agree with the crowd, I'll put it at a D tier, I don't like it at all, I think it's kind of, it just is like a weird, weird thing to throw in, it's cool but it's not, I'm kind of impartial but I'm going to put it at D tier, we are speed running through these because I don't want this video to be about 20 hours long, but next up we do have the coconut trap, which is I think one of the cooler ones, I think this is a natural vegetation type entity, not many of those that exist, I like how you put your hand in it, you'll get trapped, now we have the death moth, that might be an, oh that's an A tier, right below Samantha, death moth's classic entity, one of the first ones ever, very cool lore, very cool design, pretty cool footages about it, you already know what's up next, the best entity of all time, the party pooper entity, which recently has been brought back to the lore, absolutely love this entity, like no bones about it, seriously, such a cool entity, such a cool design, love it so much, very classic, S tier, top of the line, mint, peak, as the kids would say, alright next up we have dream weavers, love this creature too, we'll put it at A tier above Samantha, love the design, love the way it attacks on your dreams, the way it shows up in your peripheral vision, also I just realized that I'm talking so fast that it's like a auctioneer, sorry about that, alright so next up of course we have Athenian ducks, now for some reason this entity is like loved, I'm not really sure like maybe I haven't read into it in a while, I don't think I've ever covered it, I might do like a full in-depth analysis on the channel, for right now I'm going to put it at a high C tier, like the drink, caught me strawberry punch, but it's going to be right on the high C tier, it's a duck, it's a duck, next up we have the curabitter bird, another entity that people like really don't enjoy that much I don't think, low C tier, it's kind of decent design, I made a pretty cool video about it a while ago, nothing really special, it's kind of cool I guess, but not one of my favorites, the thing on level 7, adore this entity, one of the first that you run into inside the back rooms is actually scary, I love it, design's cool, everything's cool about it, awesome stuff, now a lot of you are going to be saying he's blinded by nostalgia, yeah what about it, anyways now we're back to the window entity, another S tier, amazing creature, amazing design, love the fact that you can be in any level with any window and there can be a creature behind it that's an entity itself that would suck you into this never-ending abyss of window-ness, cool stuff, of course we also have the smiler, another S tier, I mean we're getting like four S tiers in a row, smiler, when you think of the back rooms you think of smilers, let's be real, clumps, another S tier, love this creature, love the mangled discussing aspect of it, seriously, one of my favorites again, this is a pretty large S tier, I'm not gonna lie, no idea what this rubber duck is but I'm not gonna be, whatever, clinker toys, we'll put the clinker toys it'll be, a lot of these entities fall into that like zombie vibe type deal, I'm not really a big fan of that trope but the clinker toy is a pretty cool one it's got, now we have clickers which I think are pretty cool sentient little typewriters that roll around typing things and printing out paper, oh is this one of the electric zomp, okay I know, yeah I know what this one is, I forgot the name but this one's really cool, love the design on it, we'll put this in a mid-A tier, actually below clickers, that is a cool entity, it's the name is slipping me, I could probably do the right thing and search it up right now but we have a job to do, we can't, we can't just search everything we want to, okay guys, six arms, we have six arms here, one of the OGs as well, try not to let nostalgia blind me, I'll put it in A tier above this one, I love how creepy this one is, I love how it just kind of appears from the shadows, reaches out, grabs you and pulls you back in, it's kind of like what I do, now if you know this one right here, you get the senior discount, this is Petrie, like I said it might be blinding me by OGs, by the OGness but I'm going to put it like mid B, it was really cool, no idea what this is, looks like a dodo bird I think, whatever, crawlers, classic creature, high B tier, love crawlers, love that they are like this living virus fungal thing, pretty cool, Jerry of course is a, actually we'll put Jerry under Samantha, Jerry's classic, one of those OG ones as well, how there's, he's got like an entire lore around him, I think that's pretty neat and he can mind control people and he's a bluebird, I mean what else can you say, this is Bartholomeal the third, another cool entity, it's very enigmatic, definitely an A tier, you can like, like stick your hand through his fur and it's like this infinite wormhole, like it's going to get lost in there, it's pretty cool, next one up is this, can't even see what it is again, oh it's Coco, cool, Coco is the sentient AI, like it but it's kind of too SCP for me, again with the rhymes, I'm going crazy, B tier, we'll go B tier below this one, Game Master of course is an either a high A or low S, we'll put it a high A over the reality bugs, love Game Master, love the lore, of course we have Hounds which, oh low A tier, would have been a high B tier but just from the nostalgia factor, which I'm again getting blinded by I know, but still very cool creature, very cool footages about it and a cool lore, one of the most common if not the most common entities, next up we have the Beast of level five or the thing on level five, love this one so much, very cool, maybe one of the first entities that's like really smart that you could run into in your exploration of the hellscape, pretty cool, I really like it S tier, now this one so it's the mangles, I remember this one now, love this creature, I wish there was more like a drawn out digital design so I'll put it like a mid B tier, mangles are really cool, so this is of course Jess Jessica, Jess I remember, I don't really like this one, it's a frog, frogs are weird, we'll put it like a mid C tier, not a fan, now this is that one author at Toilet, at least I literally cannot remember their name, apologies for that, we'll put low B tier, I mean I don't know how I should put authors on here, but whatever, entity number 23, this is a pretty cool one as well, we'll put it like mid B, a lot of these are just going to huddle at the mid B tier to be honest, the professor of the math class level, love this dude, pretty cool OG creature as well, we'll put it at A tier, another spider, we don't really care about the spider stuff, too human, elevators, love the elevator entity, very cool design, and I love the fact that they're so common in different levels and you don't know what's going to be a real elevator and what's going to be like this, so that's pretty cool, now this is the virus, the sickness I think, pretty cool, I can't remember the name again but I'll put it at mid B, actually low B tier, we'll put it somewhere in the B tier, I think these might be dentist entities, if I remember correctly, I cannot recall if that's what they kept the name as, these are really cool though, they're really disgusting, really gross, oh here's parasitic paint, okay so this is parasitic paint, high A tier for me, I really, I don't know what this one is, so I'm going to move it down, but parasitic paint, really cool idea, since there's so many indoor levels in the back rooms and they, you know, they have paint on them and having some paint that's like this alive biological sickness, it's just a cool thing, another snake, I'm pretty sure already had this on here, so I don't know why we're doing it again, get the program together, party goer entities, now what does Brugley think about party goer entities, I think a few things, I think as I said earlier, the goofiness and the silliness of creatures like this, add to that like otherworldly uncannyness of the back rooms, however I do not enjoy all like the fan people, the huge like suckers for the party goers, you know, I wish it was not as popular as it was, but I also recognize how crucial it is to the OG-ness of the back rooms, you know, 1KD did a great job with this creature, and it really is, when you think of the back rooms, you probably think of these creatures, so I'm going to put it at the mid tier, the B tier, because I do really like how it looks, the scariness of it, but I really don't like what the fans have done to it, not really sure what this is, it looks like a dead rat, so let's open that up in a new image, oh it is a dead rat, we already did death rats, whatever, the plague doctor, so this is going to go on the C tier for a couple reasons, we'll put it above Samantha, C tier because it is a cool entity and it has some cool effects, but it literally, it almost copies like the SCP plague doctor in like a couple ways, yeah it's different I know, but it's too similar in some in some fashions, not a big fan of that, the crab, again I forgot the name, it's Ludy Me, we'll put it under the coconut trap just for now, now these entities are called allures if I remember correctly, we'll put this up here at the high B tier, allures are another OG one, they're these these black tall humanoids that have these sax phones that run around and play them randomly, pretty cool creature I would say, I honestly have no idea what this is and I, yeah I don't, I guess this is a joke entity of course, D tier, D tier, also don't know what this one is, it's I think it's, I, you know what, I'm not gonna try, now I do know what this one is, one of the OG's, the skin stealer, now the skin stealer does get an S of course, literally, actually we'll put it above the clumps and above the B solo 5, skin stealers are such a classic like back rooms type lore, the red colony, pretty cool, again I'm not really a big fan of bugs and in like real life things in the back rooms but I'll go with it as a C tier, so apparently this is the thumb kermit, never heard of this one, see, I don't know what that is, so this apparently was tile traps, I thought this was tile traps but I'm not sure what that is, thought me fake but I'm gonna put that up here because I really like the tile traps obviously, there's a couple repeats, we already had the crawler, next up we have Reviux which are pretty cool like beasts, this is there, why am I, why am I not sitting down so far, wow, sorry about that, next up of course is the memory worm, love this creature, hi A tier right above Jerry, such an OG creature, love the psychological effects, the mental effects, its design is fantastic, is another favorite of mine, personally I don't think a lot of people like this one but it is the red kins, but hi A tier, the red kins are these really powerful creatures that some people think are too OP but they kind of make everybody that gets involved with them, worship them via touching them, if they touch them and those people will be like, you know, worshiping to them, I love that, is the Wrangler, another OG, I love these, this is like taking me down memory lane, Wranglers are cool, I love where they're at, like the dark hallways deep in the back rooms, we'll put them right under six arms for now, next up another favorite of mine, the wretches or the insanities, and if you're an OG I used to use these in like literally every thumbnail, because it was cool, I love how they look, very cool design and I love how anybody can turn into one if they get like hydrated and just go crazy, this is the Eye of Argos thing, not really, I don't really know much about this like cannon so I'm just gonna put it at low B tier, I probably should research that to be honest, but it looks cool, these are those creatures that have like the liquid silence around them, I like that a lot, we'll put that at mid B tier, blow the crabs, again the name is slipping me, I can't remember all the names, but I really like that when it's like coated in liquid silence, you don't hear when it moves and it comes out of the darkness, pretty cool, alright bro, I mean what is this, this is literally just a picture with like a dude standing, maybe I'll call this a skin giver, if this is a skin giver I'll put it at A, because I love the skin giver, it's the opposite of the skin stealers, where if you get touched by it of course it makes your skin fatter and fatter until you just suffocate in a skin cocoon effectively, and we've already done the crawler so I wish that wasn't there, alright, this is the brutally ranking of every single entity that was on this website, hope you enjoyed, let me know what you think about it, I actually don't know if it was controversial or not, but I'm gonna title it that, so you guys click it, don't flame me in the comments, but I think this is the only good tier list that there ever has been created, if yours isn't like this, sorry, sorry, I mean it's okay to be wrong, alright thanks so much for watching the video, if you enjoyed this at any point in time, drop a like for the old brookster if you don't mind, also check out my third channel, I'm getting like a lot of traction over there, so if you want to be a part of the gang, before 100k, go sub there, almost at 40 right now, 40,000 not 40 sub, uploading like internet mystery creepy stuff, like creepypastas and internet ARGs and it's cool thing, it's like a passion project for me, so if you want that kind of stuff, check it out, thank you so much for all your support here and on every channel, I love and appreciate each and every one of you, if you want more real like face-to-face content like this, also leave a like and tell me, I love like interacting with you guys, feels like it's more personal, I don't know in a way, and yeah, that's it for the video, thanks so much for watching, I love and appreciate each and every one of you, and I'll see you later, bye.


मैंग्लदीखादा हमाने तादशे हैं, अर्खेरा बाशाँ मैंग्लगी लूचे क्यारी वूँँणा कूँऍर, बत ज्डूष और पूँभ्टिस्टीं आर्बशाँ क्यारी बाशाँ मैंगुए लूँँँँँँँँँँँँँँ... All the while, we have worked with the case in which we have considered a normal distribution as the population distribution. So, if we review it quickly, what we have seen is we have tested the null hypothesis if the population is normal with mean mu and variance sigma square and then we have tested the hypothesis that mu is equal to sum given value mu naught against the 3 alternative, the 2 sided alternative that mu is not equal to mu naught and the other 2 are mu is greater than mu naught or mu is less than mu naught. In both the cases we found that if the population variance sigma square is known, then it reduces down to testing a hypothesis using a test statistic z which is a standard normal variate. It is a normal variate with mean 0 and variance 1. In case we assume that sigma square is unknown, then it reduces to a test statistic which is a students t distribution statistic and it is distributed as students t distribution with n minus 1 degrees of freedom. The advantage of the 2 is that none of the 2 statistics distribution under H0, when you assume that null hypothesis is true, it does not depend on any other parameter than the value n or in case of z, it does not depend even in the size of the sample. Something I have not shown here but we also went through a testing of hypothesis process for testing that the population variance is equal to a given value sigma 0 square and we found that chi square that is n minus 1 sample variance divided by the sigma naught square is a chi square variate and that variate if we call it w then or we have called it y probably. That is the variate which is a test statistic. It becomes a chi square distribution with n minus 1 degree of freedom. So, it does not have any other parameter. Only parameter is a known value depending on the sample size and again we tested the 3 alternatives and we found 3 critical regions in which we can reject the hypothesis when we assume that null hypothesis is true. So, then comes what we want to do now. As I said before, we already made an assumption that the underlying population distribution is normal but that may not be always the case and as it was mentioned earlier also that in the material science and metallurgical engineering, number of times the data do not follow a nice symmetric distribution like normal and we cannot really apply central limit theorem because the data size is not sufficiently large. So, in this presentation today, in this session today, we would like to derive a test statistic to test the hypothesis, the same two hypothesis that the population mean is equal to a given value versus its 3 alternatives and population variance is equal to given value versus its 3 alternative but the underlying population distribution will not be assumed to be normal. In this case, as a case, we have assumed it to be viable distribution. We had mentioned it earlier. You just observe the test statistic that we found in testing the hypothesis that mu is equal to mu 0 when sigma square or the population variance is known is z which depends only on x bar and rest of them are known parameters. If you say sigma square is unknown, then sigma square gets replaced by the sample variance. So, t statistic is depends on x bar and s and otherwise mu 0 and n which are all the known quantity. This x bar and s are very special statistics because expected value of x bar is always mu and variance of x bar is always sigma square over n no matter what the underlying population distribution. Also if you look at the expected value of s square is also sigma square independent of what distribution underlying distribution is it need not be normal. So, this actually indicates that the same z and t can well be used as test statistics to test the same hypothesis mu is equal to mu 0 when sigma square is known and mu is equal to mu 0 when sigma square is unknown and we can follow the practice only thing is assumption of normality makes life easy because the distributional aspect of the test statistics z and t become very obvious. One is a standard normal distribution and the other is a t distribution with n minus 1 degree of freedom which may not be the case when you deviate from the assumption of normality. But well in that case with the advent of computers and so much of computing facility and software there always should be possible to find a numeric solution through either the numerical analysis or through Monte Carlo simulation and that is exactly what we are going to demonstrate or rather show it here. So, let us consider a case that we want to test the hypothesis mu is equal to mu 0 under viable distribution. So, here I have given you a situation in which such a problem can arise. Suppose there is an indigenous engine component and this component is now need to be replaced where we earlier the manufacturer was using an imported component. Now the developers of the indigenous component has to show that it is performance or the performance criteria that the imported component meets is are also met by the indigenous component and suppose the criteria is matching the low cycle fatigue life, LCF life is the property we would like to compare. So, assume that we have a data sample data from the indigenous component x1, x2, x3, xn and we would like to from this data we would like to show that the mean LCF value and the standard deviation of LCF value from this sample is same as what you would get from the imported component. Remember it is one can show that LCF values can follow closely viable distribution. So, let us set up the problem. We want to test if LCF of indigenous component is same as that of an imported component. So, for comparison we have two pieces of information. We have an LCF data x1, x2, x3, xn which is a random sample of size n and we have a mean value of imported component mu 0 and the standard deviation of imported component sigma 0. Let mu denote the mean value of LCF of indigenous component and sigma denote the standard deviation of the indigenous component. Then in the present case we would like to test the hypothesis that mu is equal to mu 0 where the population distribution is viable. In reality we have to assume three parameter viable distribution. In the case of special random variable we have given a very brief introduction to three parameter viable distribution. So, we will revisit it here. The probability density function of three parameter viable distribution is given in this format where psi is called the location parameter, beta is called the scale parameter and c is called the shape parameter. Now, let us take a transformed variable w which is equal to x minus psi over beta. Then it turns out to be that is also a viable distribution with location parameter 0, scale parameter 1 and the shape parameter c. So, it means that this depends only now on one parameter which is called c, it is a shape parameter. This is also called a standard viable distribution. Remember standard normal distribution does not depend on any parameter, standard viable distribution depends on one parameter which is a shape parameter. The mean of standard viable distribution mu w, mu sub w can be given as a gamma function of 1 over c plus 1. Now, if we transform the variable the viable variable into w then x can be written as psi plus beta plus w and therefore expected value of x is expected is psi plus beta times expected value of w and therefore it is psi plus beta m sub w and similarly the variance of the three parameter distribution viable distribution x variance of x is equal to sigma square can be written as beta square sigma sub w whole square. Let x1, x2, xn be a random sample with viable psi beta and c then w1, w2, wn becomes a random sample from a viable distribution with 0, 1 and c and x bar is nothing but psi plus b beta w bar and s square is beta square sw square. Let us define viable t statistic that is our t statistic that we already know x bar minus mu divided by s over square root n and which can be written as square root n w minus mu w divided by sw and this I call it a t but it will not follow the students t distribution. Whatever it may follow I call it a viable t distribution and I call this a viable t statistic. t is called a viable t statistics and unlike t distribution viable t statistic also depends on one parameter unknown parameter c which is the shape of viable distribution. So, it depends on of course the degrees of freedom should be n minus 1 and because we have estimated x bar so if the degrees of freedom will be n minus 1 but it will also have another parameter along with it which is c. Now we consider the testing of hypothesis mu is equal to mu 0 against the 3 alternatives h1 sorry it should be h1, h2, h3 but there is a mistake here. Let us correct it so that the mistake does not continue. So, it is h1, h2 and h3 so it is mu is not equal to mu 0 mu is greater than mu 0 and mu less than mu 0. We straight away assume that sigma square is unknown then the t statistic as defined above can be a t statistic for testing the hypothesis that mu is equal to mu 0. Let us define what will be the critical region. You recall what we did in the past and we follow the same steps. So, if we fix the alpha error the type 1 error at alpha then for the testing the null hypothesis against the 3 alternatives the first alternative reject h0 reject h0 if absolute value of t is greater than I call it t Weibull 1 minus alpha by 2 with n minus 1 degrees of freedom and of course there will be a parameter I am sorry of course there will be a parameter c which I have missed out. So, this is going to be your critical value the alpha 1 minus alpha by 2 comes under the same argument we are assuming that it is going to be symmetric if it is not symmetric then it has to have two value I think it is it would be more appropriate if we write it that this can be written as t less than t w 1 minus sorry alpha by 2 n minus 1 c or t is greater than t sub w 1 minus alpha by 2 n minus 1 c this is the correct way this needs to be corrected this has to be either this or that then if we consider the rejection I mean the alternate hypothesis as mu is equal to mu 0 then we say that reject h0 if t is greater than t w 1 minus alpha n minus 1 c if we take the alternate that mu is equal to is less than mu 0 then we have to say rejected 0 if t is less than t w alpha n minus 1 c please make sure that this correction is made this is the full correction this is incorrect it has to be this t has to be less than t w alpha by 2 n minus 1 or t has to be greater than so in other words like a chi square distribution we are assuming that this distribution will also be kind of a symmetric distribution and then we are taking two values this is t alpha by 2 and this is t 1 minus alpha by 2 with the rest of the parameters so there is n minus 1 and c here also there is n minus 1 and c this is the case with respect to this so if you are looking for this situation then you are going to look into this area to be alpha and therefore this value is going to be t 1 minus alpha n minus 1 c and if you are looking for the fourth case if you are looking for this fourth case then you will have to take some value here where this value this area is going to be alpha and therefore this is going to be t sub w alpha n minus 1 and c I hope this is clear so these are going to be the critical region so how do we find any critical value and again I have to add a c here I have to add a c here because it is actually so this should be written as t sub w alpha n minus 1 and c so it is a weibull t distribution depends on degrees of freedom n minus 1 and shape parameter of a weibull distribution c therefore weibull t distribution does not have any closed form solution the way we have defined it it does not have a closed form solution hence the critical values of weibull t are generally simulated we will give you the here how to simulate it so this montecarlo simulation can be carried out that first you take mu 0 because that is already given to you the next is you convert this c 0 is equal to 1 over gamma inverse mu 0 gamma inverse is the inverse gamma function mu 0 minus 1 you remember why we are doing this because mu 0 is actually defined as gamma of 1 over c 0 plus 1 please recall so if you take the inverse function and any mathematical programming language will have an excess how to find a gamma inverse function so you can as well use this then you generate capital M number of samples of size small n capital M number of samples of size n M is typically 5000 10000 lakh i mean depending on computer capability and the random generators capability you can decide what should be the size of m so you generate this M number of samples of size small n from weibull 0 that is standard weibull distribution with a c 0 which you have already calculated in the previous step with that you generate the weibull random variables this is your sample so you call it wji i runs from 1 to n it represents the sample and j represents the number of simulations these j are m populations and therefore you have j is equal to 1 to m wj bar and swj square you calculate the weibull t statistic using this formula once you have M capital M of tj you sort them out from smallest to the largest and if you take 1 minus alpha time mth value of tj that will be the alpha level critical value of weibull t distribution depending on c 0 so what you really need to do is for different values of c 0 you have to simulate this or as and when needed you take what is your m 0 you convert it into your c 0 and write a nice program so that every time it generates this critical value and gives you please remember when we do Monte Carlo simulation it is very important to see the stability of it make sure that the seed that is given into it does not conflict with your Monte Carlo simulation process if suppose now we want to test sigma square is equal to sigma naught square well under normal population if you want to test our test statistics w is n minus 1 s square over sigma 0 square which is a chi square n minus 1 degrees of freedom just as in the previous case of testing mu is equal to mu 0 we find rather we observe that expected value of s square is sigma naught square or sigma square independent of what is underlying population hence w can also be a test statistic for the present case and when population under concern is weibull such a statistic is called a weibull chi square statistics and the distribution is called weibull chi square distribution again you can find the critical region here also please remember the statistic will depend on c so let me write it down everywhere so we will have this with c here also there will be a c so if you are taking a null hypothesis sigma 0 square is equal to sigma square is equal to sigma 0 square and your alternate is sigma square is not equal to sigma 0 square then your test is divided in two region reject null hypothesis if your test statistic w is smaller than chi square w that is weibull chi square with alpha by 2 n minus 1 degrees of freedom and parameter c by the way this parameter such a parameter c is generally called a nuisance parameter or w is greater than chi square w square that is the weibull chi square at probability 1 minus alpha by 2 with n minus 1 degrees of freedom and nuisance parameter c your alternate is sigma square is greater than sigma 0 square then we say that rejected 0 if chi your statistics w is greater than the weibull chi square with probability 1 minus alpha n minus 1 degrees of freedom and nuisance parameter c and if sigma square is less than sigma 0 square is your alternative then the critical value is weibull chi square at alpha probability n minus 1 degrees of freedom and nuisance parameter c so you find the critical values of weibull chi square distribution with n minus 1 degrees of freedom and nuisance parameter c well we have to take the same steps as given to simulate the critical values instead of calculating a test statistic which is test statistic which is tj you calculate wj and sort wj from smallest to the largest and take 1 minus alpha times mth value which will give you weibull chi square critical value please remember here the value given is sigma 0 square so there will be a slight change in the beginning you will take sigma 0 square and from that you will calculate there is you have to find out the formula for sigma 0 square which is given earlier and then you have to calculate the value of c0 and then do the simulation so let us summarize it we defined the testing of hypothesis process for testing mu is equal to mu 0 and sigma square is equal to sigma 0 square under non-normal distribution in particular we took the case of weibull we did this because we found that the test statistic z and t which we have chosen under normal population their properties of choosing them for statistic is independent of what is the underlying population so we decided that the same statistic can also be useful we felt that it can also be useful to test the hypothesis under different population distribution we did that with the weibull distribution we found weibull t and weibull chi square statistic we found the critical region and we gave the steps through Monte Carlo simulation to simulate the critical values please remember there is nothing holy about weibull this is just a case has been given to you because when you say that distribution is non-normal there are too many probability possibilities come up so we have shown you one possibility you can change it and see how the test procedure can develop as and when the need arises thank you


Good afternoon, everyone. I would like to welcome you to our session about Seniors Citizens' Writing Wikipedia. My name is Jan Beranek and currently I work with Wikimedia Czech Republic as coordinator of programs for editors and also I'm one of the trainers in the Seniors' Writing Wikipedia project. So Wikimedia Czech Republic started a project in 2014 and I've been involved since year 2019 as one of the trainers. I added Wikipedia since year 2018. Since that we found out what works, what doesn't work, but we are still trying to find some new ways to improve, how to engage seniors more and we would like to share these ways. We figured out how to keep the seniors involved in the long run after we teach them how to edit Wikipedia. So the whole project started in year 2014. It was initiated by Jan Sokol who was a university professor. He was president of the candidate and very recognized authority in the Czech Republic. He was also very passionate about editing Wikipedia. He made 30,000 edits during his life, created 2,000 articles. This is a very quite famous quote from him that we used to promote the project and I think it's true. About the numbers, we're doing this from 2014. We had over 600 editors going through our programs and we've made our courses in more than 17 towns. So what is the key to our project? Well, the first important thing is our user guide. We have it printed. We found out the seniors, they like the paper version, but we also have it online for the people joining online. But we found out that they usually print it at home. We have framework for both courses. We have two, one basic and one advanced. Each of them is six following lessons, six following weeks, and each lesson takes two hours. I was talking about this to someone and they told me two hours, that's too long. But it's not just two hours of of a lecture of me talking. It's two hours of activities. We let them edit for 15 minutes, then talk for a bit. So it's two hours, it's past like 10 minutes. We try to cooperate with libraries, NGOs, partners, and University of Third Age. And we train also librarians to become new trainers and trying to get more people from our community to start training seniors. We do our sessions both online and offline. It's pretty much based on the seniors' preference, where do they live? For some of them, it's not really possible to come outside. But we found out they're really good with using Meet or Zoom or stuff like this. We have this feature on Chick Wikipedia called mentorship. And what we do, we assign the trainers, the lecturers as mentors for for the seniors at Wikipedia as well. And we have a really nice coordinator communicating with the seniors on a daily basis. So they have one contact person they can reach to always. Here are some pictures. You have one of the online courses and offline. Both of them are taught by a trainer who is senior herself. And he took our course. She liked it so much, she became a trainer after that. So what else do we do for our seniors? We have alumni club. We have extension courses for them. So we teach them how to do commons, how to do wiki data. We have this thing called wiki school that's to our lesson activity each month. And we try to cover specific topics. So we had wiki school about uploading other people's work to commons or a session about info boxes, how to edit them, how to create a new one. We have an event called annual senior wiki town. The picture is from the wiki town a few years ago. And we gather all the people that participated in in past, usually quite a few of them come. And we spent a weekend with them, edit Wikipedia about that town we are at, take pictures, do fun stuff, meetings. They really love it. And then we do photo workshops, expeditions with them, usually trying to teach them all the skills. But it's not just about education, it's about social contact as well. So we do Christmas and New Year's party. We try to meet them as much as possible. This is from my from our alumni club. You can see it's really nice meet up in a in a cafe, just talking, chatting, sharing stuff. They really love it. We know that recognition and validation is very important for each wiki pita editor. And all wiki pita is done to barn stars, right? So we created three tiers, you could say. We have first one for the basic up so went and currently we gave it to 267 people. That doesn't necessarily mean we had 267 people up solving the curse. It's just the number of people that were given the barn star. And after that, the trainer of the curse may give anyone after one year and activity and 200 edits. We currently have 14 orders of that and the highest year, two years of activity, 500 edits, 50 articles. We have just five holders up to now. So we have four main challenges each year round. And we've been trying to get our seniors to participate in those events. These are pictures from the editor tones from women's month on wiki pita or human rights month. And we're really showing them they are welcome because sometimes we told them, OK, this is the projects for community event. And they are like, well, I just was in one course. I don't think I belong in the community. So we really make them feel they do belong. And I think they feel like they do belong and it really creates this this intergenerational connection in between. So what are the results? We have. We have three lectures that were raised from the people who attended the basic course. There are three, two of them are women. And some of the absolvents actually joined our Wikimedia Czech Republic chapter. And the libraries really recognize us. So when we come to them and say we would like to host senior citizens right wiki pita course at your library, they usually know and they are OK and fine with them. And here are some numbers about last year. So 14 courses to advanced and we had 262 expanded sites. I think that's quite a lot. So we are still in love with the program. We still love it. We've been doing it for years. And I think they're still the same energy that was there at the beginning. For me personally, it's seeing the seniors like how happy they are to learn new stuff. They come to the lessons and they are exciting about us showing them something new they didn't know about. And right now I would like to show you our video we had for fundraising campaign last year. And there are two of our absolvents talking about their experience. I got an e-mail with an invitation to a senior wiki pita course and that's how I was very happy to be invited. I was most excited about it, if it wasn't for me. But then I was very happy about it. I wrote something for 270 members. The wiki pita is a magical horse. I feel like I'm participating in a big meaningful project. I'm writing about Czech wiki pita. I'm getting excited about this horse. I wrote about the first member of my group, Prastríci, who was a Nazi in 1942. He was very imperfect in terms of formality, partly in terms of formality. But he was very shy, a colleague of wiki pita. He started to fill it up. There was a photo of a drawing of a matric, just like the birth of that wiki pita. They filled it up with photos. And it reminded me of a little child, who at the same time looks at how they develop beautifully and grow into beauty. I have to admit that wiki pita is something for me like a drug. From the very beginning, what I started writing about the first member. Thanks to wiki pita I met a lot of interesting people and I have a very good feeling about the members I wrote. The lecturer was a very nice young man. He was very patient and sweet with us. And I think that he was very proud of the fact that I didn't give up at the beginning. It's often said that we don't have critical thoughts or we don't get critical thoughts. We send fake emails and so on. And I think that writing about wiki pita is really a development, a critical thought, because we have to believe in everything that is good, good and so on. Thanks to the fact that I wrote about wiki pita, I survived the last lockdown without nervousness. I didn't even think about the lockdown. This summer we learned how to write about wiki pita with a scenario. We want them to come to their place in the digital world thanks to wiki pita, we have found 150. To achieve this, we need about 30 correct answers. Are you coming with us? If you are a fan, become a patron of the wiki pita project and send us as many as you can, no matter how many you will miss. Thank you for all the scenarios and scenarios that become a part of wiki community and get a new horse. Wiki Zdar. Support the wiki pita with a scenario. This is a great meaningful project. So here's a page of resources. When you go back to our presentation, you can go through it, click through it and see what you've been up to. And this is pretty much enough for my presentation and now I would like to ask you for any questions or maybe we can open a discussion how is it going with seniors in your country? Hello, hi. Thank you so much for this. Can you tell us a little bit more about how you talked about intergenerational element for this? Can you tell us a little bit more of how you brought the different generations together? Yes. Well, for me it was basically joining wiki media at the Republic trying to figure out all the different stuff I can do and then I was shown this project, this amazing project with seniors. And I think that's been the way for other young members of our community as well. Yeah, I think they're also looking for the different ways to participate and this is such a natural way to get old people and young people together. So yeah. I'm Obi from Nigeria. I want to thank you for this lovely presentation. In my country I organized a group of senior citizens as well and I can say I've picked one or two things from what you have just shared today. To help you answer our question, bringing the young and the older generation together, in my own experience I asked for help from the younger generations because they understand digital literacy. The seniors had to find it difficult using the digital tools. So some came, I made it open, some came with their grandchildren. So the grandchildren helped me to train them with digital tools first before we started editing Wikipedia. Secondly, the challenge we had, another challenge we had was editing English Wikipedia. It was kind of difficult for them. Some of them their articles were deleted because they are not conversant with the policies and guidelines. So we had to change strategy. We adopted editing wiki data and commons which is very, very easier for them. We taught them how to use their phones to take photographs and now how to upload them in wiki commons with the help of the younger generation as well. Thank you. I think also with the younger generation most of us during COVID went through online learning so we are quite used to doing stuff online and we can quite naturally pass it to the old people. What would... I'm trying to think my question. What are the biggest challenges of working with seniors and with the wiki media projects? Is there something in particular that you had to talk with the team or you had to contact other partners to address to this public? Well, in the past it's been the digital literacy of seniors but last couple of years basically for the whole time I'm in the programme we don't really see as big difference between old people between how they can use IT. They're usually kind of OK at it already because from what I've heard at the start of the programme when they came to our events they didn't know how to do anything on a computer so usually we have them pretty much OK at that but our courses our lessons for seniors they are obviously more slow-paced than the evidence we do for students so it's choosing the right pace also I think it's the printed materials what's important for seniors because when they attend lessons from home through Zoom I've heard from some of them they like to print the guidebook themselves at home and we have it in printed form when they go to our events in person we give it to them so you can actually take a look at it afterwards also for them to get more comfortable using Zoom and other digital tools we offer a zero orientation lesson when we can go through the virtual platform with them show them how to connect how to share screen and do stuff like this Do all of the seniors have a computer or laptop on their own at home? Well, personally I only hosted online sessions with them for that it's needed but when we have some lessons at some library pretty much always we try to get a room with computers so they don't have to bring their laptops they don't have to, but I'm not sure I'm not sure about this Sorry, let me ask when you organise programmes is it a particular kind of exercise do you introduce different types of exercises that they can do? Because I know some don't like editing in my own case some like telling stories they will tell you stories then you write So our basic lessons they are really focused on editing and the output of that is usually writing own article but we try to show them all the different ways to participate the basic lessons they also include lesson on taking picture and uploading to commons so we show them these two main ways and then we have the wiki school for them which are monthly meetups on some more advanced projects Last time we had session about wiki voyage about the travel guide on wiki to show them different projects and how to participate Thank you so much Jant, I think it's time for break now


This is a new series called Dine and Dish, where we make a meal and have an intimate conversation with some of our favorite people. Today, we are making vegan bourbon mushrooms and rice with our homies Jade and Devin. Now Jade and Devin are not just married, they're also musical and business partners. Their project, All Blue, has well over a million plays and is now streaming on every single platform. So we've had a ton of conversations with Jade and Devin in the past about marriage, so we were super excited to hear what they thought of Jada Pinkett Smith and Will Smith's Red Table Talk. Now in the comments section, the question I want you all to answer is, is marriage the ultimate goal for a relationship? Well, literally every person on my Twitter feed, it was like, yo, that's goals right there, yo, yo, yo, Will and Jada did this. And I was like, oh, so maybe I should check this out. And then when you brought it up, I was like, yeah, let's watch it. Let's take it to the world. On top of being obsessed with her, like I think their relationship's always kind of been intriguing to a lot of people because there's always, yeah, there's always been so much speculation and for them to finally, you know, address a lot of that is kind of dope. Well, were you guys watching, like, let me learn or like, let's figure it out. Let's see what they're actually gonna say. I think a little bit of both. Yeah. Yeah, cause I mean, they have so many unorthodox ways about them like over the years and so much speculation that it's like, what's really going on behind it. The only thing they did say is that they're not swingers. That's so specific though. That was a way to kind of get it. Cause yeah, that's a different lifestyle. He said that is a very specific lifestyle. He didn't say we haven't experimented with other people sexually, which is their business. But yeah, they, he only said we do not swing.  This is not my ideal relationship. And some people did feel that way. I expect there to be more. That's the problem. We're all trying to have a one size fits all standard. Why don't you need to comment on somebody else's choice? It's like whatever it says. And you said like how many people do we know that's had a successful marriage in a traditional context? Like, so obviously there's something wrong. Like we were talking about this just yesterday. Like if someone told me there was a 50% chance that your money, you would lose your money if you invested in something, I would like kind of try to figure out a way to make it work for me. I wouldn't do it the way everyone else was doing it who were failing at a 50% rate. What is your guys' relationship? How do you define the language around it? As far as life partnership versus marriage? Yeah. Life partnership? Yeah, for sure. For sure. Yeah. You're like the one for marriage. I kind of established that pretty early. Yeah. We didn't want to put all like the baggage in the wait on marriage. Yeah. I think that's really unhealthy. It's like, okay, now we're going to get this like approved by the government. It's like, so it really holds on my weight in my eyes. It's like more so making sure that we protect ourselves and understand that people understand that we're serious about our commitment to each other. I don't think having a doctorate makes you a doctor. It's the years that you put in, the passion that you have for medicine and those letters communicate to people, this is what I am. Yeah. But like that's not what makes you incredible at your job. Exactly. That's amazing. Yeah, cause it's like, it's a way of like, when you say, when I say to someone like, oh, this is my fiance, this is my wife.  Like, oh, respect on that. They can say, but we're doing shows or something. I'm like giving up for my husband. Like instantly they turn into these weird like, oh, now I'm really into him. Like it's super weird. Do you guys think that marriage is something couples should aspire to? Is it hashtag goals? I don't think marriage is hashtag goals. I think we, it's, because of society, we put so much weight on marriage and we totally forget ourselves. I see so many people do that.  So, yeah, I think connection, true connection without jealousy, without all these negative emotions is goals, honestly, yeah. What about you? Wait, what about you? No, I agree, I agree. I think when you put that title on it, it seems like the job is done or something. And I think that's the problem. What I liked about the Will and Jada thing is they show that it's an ever-changing thing. And a lot of people don't wanna adjust when life changes. That is what I think creates the conflict because then it's like, you're not loving me the way that I want you to, so this doesn't work. And I actually, I tweeted this the other night. But now I was saying that a lot of people want unconditional love, but they really don't understand what that shit means. Like unconditional love, like do you really know what that means? That's what Will is saying. There is nothing that Jada can do that is gonna make me not love. I feel uncomfortable with the term unconditional love. Maybe that's just my super logical brain being like, everything has conditions and conditions are healthy because it should never be a given. Like, I don't even like the concept of loyalty for that reason, because loyalty says that I will stick by you no matter what. But I only have one life to live. You know what I mean? But how good does loyalty feel? I don't think that, I think choice feels better to me. I wouldn't want someone to stick by me just because I was there first. I want you to choose me because I'm the best option because I make sense, because I'm adding value to your life.  That's more what I find as a feeling of love. I feel like choice feels like love and unconditional love to me just seems like an unrealistic expectation.  We'll be honest with you. Yeah, I love you. I mean, I think marriage is, it's definitely goals. I think that if we redefine what marriage is, then it could be really what everyone is striving to be. I think most people, when they hear marriage, they just think of the title. And marriage is so much more than the title. I think it's a certain devotion that you have to each other. It's symbolic. It's like, we're like partners and to the world and to the government standards, this is how I'm gonna show that. I hate that it's a method of quantifying the value of a relationship. And I almost hate participating in that, in us. Yeah, but it helps though. It does help, but I hate the fact because I know some 17 year olds who are in a healthy relationship that battles what some of my aunts and uncles have been married for 40 years have. Like the mutuality, the respect that they have for each other, to me, that is a better example of love. But like marriage is the benchmark of love. Like every time that a couple is like, we've been married for 50 years. Everyone's like, oh. But are they happy? Versus the couple who was happily married for 10 years and they decided to split amicably. We don't applaud. It's like, if it ends, then it couldn't have been happy for that moment. Yeah, I feel you. So it's like, yeah, I feel torn about a lot of it. And I feel torn to participate in it in some capacity, but. But you have to. I have to. You have to. I'm glad to, because I would have chosen you regardless. No, I'm not saying you have to get married. No. I'm just saying that you have to participate. No, I'm just saying that you have to participate because it does age you. It does age you in a business world. Yeah. Being married is going to help you. It's going to help you describe a relationship. And I don't think that selfish or like shallow at all. Like we do anything for, we do things that we don't necessarily want for anything for our jobs or our careers. Being an entrepreneur or anything. So I think it's totally healthy to use things to your advantage, to operate in this world the best way you can. And it's a business, it's a partnership. So anything else you go into business, there is some sense of expectation to make it run smoothly. I think it is, it's dope. I like being married. I love being married. Yeah. To you. What spawned the marriage question? Because you guys did it young, right? I don't know. Who's the next step? Yeah, we had moved to LA together. I think we were really happy with this career and where our lives were going. And it just made sense. I think we knew we wanted to be with each other. And we saw the beauty in our unity. Like things started to, not even to sound all super divine, but there's nothing like fun. And I'm sure you guys can relate. Like everything just seemed to blossom in a way that individually it just didn't do. We came together and he was able to balance out. Not that I'm not whole. I don't mean as a person, but I just mean their strengths to having another person to help enhance everything that you do. Yeah, there's nothing, no better agreement than partnership. You can't get any more on the same page than having two minds come together. Cause when you have a third or a fourth or having many more, it's more likely for chaos. So I think that's the root of all ideas, all creation is to have that like mind between two people. Like to your point, everything in my life went up. Like in the partnership, it's somehow enhanced every single aspect of my life. And so I can't even fathom coming home and having to like download my day with someone that I haven't been going through it with. Because you know, you have somebody like, when you have a significant other that, let's say you don't work with, you still get to bounce off and lean on when you're feeling down, but there's a certain level of like understanding.  So it's like, when you're feeling heavy, I can understand that heaviness because I've been working with it. You know what I mean? And it's like, there's a different level of leaning cause we're leaning on each other now. It's not like you coming home and being like, man, so this happened today, boom and just throwing it on me. It's like, no, we did it together. Versus singing it'd be real to the, to your point. I mean, I don't know, I've been great working with, regardless with anybody that I work with, you know what I mean? Everywhere I work, I shine, but you know, this, this situation definitely like showed me like, I can work with a partner cause I didn't think I could do that with a significant other, ever. And I've had an easy person to work with. Hell no. Yeah. You saw how many times she got up and moved with that. Yeah, go for it, yeah. And smile. Kevin, give me a favor. Can you take a conversation with like a person here? Like a smile, like laugh, just need a, like, whoever's, we're not even going to be done. But we're supposed to be done, but that's, that's Jadae's, but I made it. Can you pick it up? Or can Jadae pick it up? What? Just pick it up. Do you guys, are you guys committed to life? Like how Will and Jadae were like, we're, we're in this for life. Like we made a decision. Are you guys at that place? I mean, that's definitely the goal, but I think we also understand that the only healthy way to take anything is day to day. You know what I mean? But with an understanding, right? You know. That's our goal, but. But like you said, if he kills my mom, it may be a little weird for us for a day. But as long as our, the core of who we are doesn't like completely change in terms of our morals or like respect or, you know, loving people that treat people, you know, right? Yeah, within reason. So realistic forever, you know. I think I'm in, I think I'm put all my chips in, you know? I think I'm in, I think also, I'm also, you know, every day is a new day. Yeah.  Why is that the thing for all of this? It's a wrap. Oh, it's a wrap. I thought you meant like you were shrugging like. No, no. What did she say? She can't be really negative. No, it's a wrap. I'm just saying, I'm saying, I'm saying that like every day is a new day. So right now, I choose you. Yeah.  And that's just what it is. And if there's anything that we go through, you work through it. And from that perspective, that I've chose you as a life partner. I will say like, we got into this argument maybe like a month ago. And you went to like, I'm not sure if you're gonna want to marry me. I don't know if you want to be, God, that's it. It's imitation of him. So like, there you go. Like, who are you? Yeah, I don't know. We are minimum two years away from this conversation.  In 2021, I'm gonna be like, okay, this phase is lasting a real long time. Let's reevaluate. So you've built up a lot of like equity in the company. You've built up a lot of loyalty. Is it a lifetime's worth? I don't know what that looks like yet. So do we all agree that it's kind of a little unhealthy? Yeah. Yeah. A little unhealthy to promise forever. Yeah. And I think, but I think that we're all kind of saying the same thing. Yeah. It's like, I think that's what we all want. That's our goals. Right. But we understand that. Amen. It happens. Right. And if I'm not happy, like, this can't continue. But that's the thing, like if you go into a marriage in a traditional sense and say forever, people have that, oh, well, I can kind of do whatever and I can let myself go. And then it creates that environment for things to go south. But when you're honest, it creates a sense of, let me keep myself together because I understand that this is disposable. If, you know what I mean? It just helps you keep yourself together, just really recognizing what everyone kind of knows because you can go into it saying forever and 50% of those people still don't do that. So. Yeah. So it's just like our intent is to go as far as this can go. And that's just what it is. And I don't think marriage defines that. And I don't want anybody out there that's thinking about marriage defining their relationship to think that that's what the goals are. And then there's so many more things that you need to wrap up before you just think of marriage. Marriage is a layer. Yeah.  It's like, cool, yeah. I'm good here with this foundation where it's just put the metal on. The metal on, yeah. The gold metal. You know what marriage is? Marriage is the WWE belt.  You know what I mean?  You gotta keep earning that belt. Yeah, you gotta keep going in and earning that belt. Your nest? And don't you forget it. Cheers to that. Yes. It's bad luck for you to cheer, Shani. So you get out of here. Now you can tell they're plastic cups, but it's sad. They didn't even add like post-production cups. Exactly, exactly. I put in some dings in there. Yeah, I used to think about you when I had no one to talk to.