What's going on guys, welcome back to another video. So in this one, I'm going to be showing you two different products which have both made over $100,000. I will of course be showing you the evidence behind this as well. So we'll be taking a look at the Facebook ad itself that has generated these results. I will of course show you the products and where you can source this from. So if you did want to consider selling one of these products yourself, then you can, you know where to go to to get it. All of these products by the way are current and up to date. They're currently being paid to be advertised today. So if you are thinking about starting your business soon then definitely give one of these products a consideration. And we will of course be taking a look at the actual Shopify store and the product page of these products that we can use, see what kind of strategies they're using, the content, the descriptions that we can of course take and use for inspiration to implement into our own businesses.  There's no one better to learn from than people who are already doing it successfully. So make sure you take some notes, look at the kind of things that these guys are doing and implement them into your own business. And with that being said, there's not a lot more to say so thanks for tuning in. Hope you guys enjoy it and let's jump straight into it. Okay, so product number one in which I wanna show you guys is this Enchanted Luna Lamp. There's a few different reasons and why it features in this video, why it deserves to feature in this video. So before we go through the numbers, let's take a look at some of the validation. So this is a breakdown essentially of the posts of the Facebook ad details taken from Shopify. Shopify is a brilliant tool by the way. I'm not affiliated with them in any single way. If you are looking for a way to find like really good proven products such as this one super quick, then definitely check them out. So first of all, let's go over the informations in the top right corner. We can see this post was created back in April, 2021. And the last scene date was today, March 7th which is the date I'm recording this video. So it just goes to show it's a tried and tested product over a long period of time. Most products tend to kind of fall off after that Q4 period. But what we can see from this is that because of the type of product it is, it's gonna sell consistently throughout the year. So if you are looking for something that you can kind of sell for the next couple of years consistently, then potentially this is the right products for you. We can also see a summary of the reactions in this bottom left hand corner here, 86,000 likes which is obviously pretty incredible with 20,000 love reactions, 12,000 shares and 14,000 comments. If we actually jump into Facebook and take a look at the ad itself, there's something I wanna show you which is even more important than engagements. You may have heard me talk about it a lot recently in my recent videos because it's super, super important if you're doing product research and you're trying to find products which are going to give you the best chances of success, then this is essentially what you're looking for. So Sylvia here says she loves her light. It's so gentle in the bedroom, so she's obviously purchased it. In fact, she even goes on to say an absolutely wonderful purchase. Sarah Astin says absolutely thrilled to receive my lamp. I got this for my daughter from Dawn. Mary says I ordered one this morning. Mary, a different Mary says I brought one initially. Absolutely love it. Danielle also says I bought one of these. In fact, this was from 40 weeks ago. So if we go back to the top and instead of the most relevant go for newest, then we can see just how recently people are coming in. So 25 weeks, I don't know why that's at the top. Let's open up some of these and try and find some more recent ones. So comments are from as little as eight hours ago. So it just goes to show it is still current. People are still coming in one day, two day, three days ago, so on and so forth. Rose says she has this for a son. This was three days ago. Nancy says that she has one. However, it took 15 days to get here. So that's kind of like a telltale sign. They are indeed dropship in this product, which I'll prove to you in a second when I show you it on AliExpress. One week ago Karen says she bought two for Christmas. So it just goes to show people are still coming in recently. So Kelly L. Lang, one week ago, I bought three of these. So that's pretty surprising actually. I didn't think people would buy more than one, but just goes to show people don't only see products on Facebook as things they buy for themselves. If you've got a product which makes a really nice gift, then that can also be kind of like one of the ingredients to a quote-unquote winning product. Next up then, let's take a look at the Shopify store. It's always an important part of the puzzle, part of the jigsaw. Again, you may have heard me mention in previous videos that there's kind of three core elements or three pillars to success when it comes with e-commerce. Number one is obviously the product, probably the most important one. Number two is the Shopify store. You've got to have somewhat of a decent Shopify store so people trust you enough to make a purchase. And then of course, number three is you need a really effective Facebook ad, which these guys obviously have. I've got to mention the fact that they're just using a single image, and this is an image taken from AliExpress, so if you are looking for literally the simplest products to get started with and the quickest of products to get started with, then this could definitely be the one for you. One of the other contributing factors, I believe, of why this product's been so successful is because it's an LED product. LED products have that wow factor, which means they're gonna get attention online. The sole kind of objective of your Facebook ad is to get somebody to stop scrolling through their newsfeed and take attention of what it is you're trying to display or what it is you're trying to sell. That's literally half the battle of your Facebook ad. And LED products do a really nice job of this because of the effects they have, because of the effects that lights have. It's been proven that lights make humans produce endorphins, it actually makes people feel good when they see lights because it gives off a nice effect, which is one of the reasons why LED products are such a good niche and such a good range of products to consider selling.  So with that being said, if we go back to the store, we can see they do pretty much everything to an adequate standard. It's kind of like a quite a nice and neat and tidy store. It doesn't look like a paid theme to me, looks like a pretty basic free theme, so it just goes to show you, haven't got to spend a lot to have an effective store. At the top, they've got the catalog about us. I typically put this in the footer, track your order, which is important, shipping info, which is important, and contact us, which is obviously super important. What you have to keep in mind is that as a new business, or even if you're not a new business, the first time somebody comes across your business, there's gonna be all these kind of subconscious hurdles people have in their minds that you need to overcome in order for them to make a purchase with you, and they want to know things like, is their payment information secure? When are they gonna receive the product? Can they track the product? Can they get hold of you if there's a problem with the order? So these are all the sorts of things you need to have on your store if you're gonna be successful. Not to spend too much time on it then, but if we go through the product description, we can see it's pretty basic. A couple of lines followed by a nice, effective image of how the lamp looks. Couple more lines, nice, effective image. Couple more lines, and then they've got this kind of pledge to plant a tree. Whether they do so or not, I have no idea to be honest, I haven't done the research into this company, and they've got a nice big 30 day money back guarantee to put the customer's mind at ease that they can get refund if they don't like it. They have a kind of like short, sharp FAQ, which is a nice touch to put on the product page. And then of course, we've all seen this app before, it's looks, reviews, and these are the sort of images which will help sell your product 10 fold. As for sourcing this product then, if you wanna find it on AliExpress, the search term you need to be using is enchanted lamp. These are the initial results that came up. As we can see, there's multiple different suppliers of this particular product. I usually like to filter by most orders and start with the biggest suppliers of a particular product to start my research. So I can get kind of like a good idea of who can ship it the quickest and for the best price. But what we can see is you can source these products for in and around sort of $14. If we nip back to their website, they're selling it for 32 pounds, which is probably about $40, $45. So it's a good kind of $25, $30 profit margin of room to be made per sale, which is pretty decent and definitely affordable when it comes to Facebook ad costs. So as for the numbers, then you may still be wondering how I know it's made over $100,000. So let's jump into the numbers now and this is how we're gonna work it out. So all you need to know to kind of get a rough ballpark figure of how much money a Facebook ad has made is to work out how many clicks it has had. And because we can see how many engagements it's had, we can work out roughly how many clicks it's had and then we can go on from there. So if I take you through the process step by step right now, any future posts or Facebook ads that you come across, you can use this formula to kind of work out roughly how much money that particular ad is making. So first of all, let's start with the amount of shares, which is 11,000. In fact, if we go back to Dropspy, I think it was a bit more and that said 12,000. So 12,000 shares is how much this particular Facebook ad has had. And what I'm gonna do is kind of take my own ad results to use to kind of base and work out how many clicks this has had. So if we take a look at one of my best performing campaigns at the top here for this particular ad account, we can see that this post has had 414 shares. And let me just scroll across so you can see this with a reach of 260,000 people. So what we need to do is divide their amount of shares by my amount of shares and that will give us their reach. So my shares are 400. The shares on this particular post is 12,000. So if we bring up our calculator and we can put in their 12,000 shares divided by 400 equals 30. So they have 30 times the amount of shares that I do. What we now need to do is times my reach by 30 and that will give us the reach of their ad as well. So if we take that 30 and times it by the 260,000 of that campaign that we just saw, that gives us a reach of 7.8 million. Now, if we take an average kind of click through rate, link click through rate, which is really average for a decent ad set, then this will give us the amount of people who have actually clicked the link in the ad and gone to the website. So what we can do is times this 7.8 million by 0.02. And that gives us 156,000 clicks. So what we now know up to this point is that this particular Facebook ad has in and around 156,000 clicks. It could be a lot more, it could be a lot less but this is gonna give us a rough average. What we now need to do is take an average conversion rate of Shopify store. If we take a look at this Shopify store which corresponds to that ad account in which we just saw, we can see the online store conversion rate for this particular product is 3.51% with an average order value of in and around sort of $45. So that just goes to show it's a similar sort of product in a similar sort of price range. So what I'm gonna do is base our numbers on a 3.5 conversion rate as well. So what we can do now is we can take this 156,000 clicks and we can times it by 3.5% to give us the amount of orders in which this product has had. So to do that, we times it by 0.035. And that gives us approximately 5.5,000 orders. All we need now then to work out the total revenue generated is in fact the product price, which is 32 pounds. So if we bring back our calculator and times this by 32 pounds, that gives us a total revenue generated of 174,720 pounds. And converted into US dollars is give or take about $200,000. Now, obviously these are rough ballpark figures, but I think it's safe to say that this product is made well in excess of $100,000. It's currently being advertised today. So it's still a current tried and tested verified winning product. So again, if you are considering or looking for products to get started with your business, then definitely give this one a consideration. And with that being said, let's move on to product number two. Moving on to product number two, then we have this pet product, or more specifically a dog product. I'll play the Facebook ad for you now so you can see exactly what it is.  So after a dog walk, you can kind of dip your dog's paws in it and it'll get rid of any muck or mud just to clean their paws off. So even if they are running around on your carpet, or in your car, then it's not mud that they're traipsing in. It is just kind of clean water, which trust me, is a lot better than having mud on your dog's paws. It has a pretty nice feature, which we just saw that you can kind of drag out. I believe some of them are actually dishwasher proof too, which is a big plus. So all in all, a pretty neat product because it's in that kind of pet niche too, we obviously know pet products are super effective on Facebook for social media because if we go back to that rule, which I mentioned in the first half of the video, half the battle for your Facebook ad is to capture attention and pets, animals, having fun, doing silly daft things, always capture attention. There's nothing better at capturing attention in my opinion, in fact, on social media than a cute dog, puppy, kitten, whatever it may be. Before we jump into the numbers then quickly, if we take a look at the dates in the top right hand corner, we can see this was created back in 2019 and was last seen today on March 7th, 2022. So this is a tried and tested product over a number of years. The reactions themselves are absolutely pretty good too. We can see in the bottom left corner here, 16,000, 1,000, 13,000 shares, which is awesome and 23,000 comments. Just to take a quick look of the actual post on Facebook, it's always a useful exercise to check out the comments and just to point out a strategy that this page is using, they're taking the time to respond to the majority of people who are commenting on their post. In fact, let's go for newest just to see if they are still active or let these loads up. So we can see people are still coming to nine hours, 13 hours ago, 16 hours ago, one day ago, still an active and current product and even the page itself is still taking the time to respond to people, which is a great sign. People want to know half the battle for a business advertising on Facebook. If you're not a household name, half the battle is coming across as being trustworthy. People want to know that you are a real legitimate business because more and more people are becoming savvy to scams and being more cautious and know the sorts of things to look out for. So by being active within the actual post itself and answering questions and talking to customers, it just comes across as much more trustworthy because you're humanizing the brand. If we take a look at the Shopify store selling this product then, we can tell straight away it's a debutify store that's selling the products for $30, which in my opinion is pretty expensive, but they probably have to sell it at that much in order to make a profit. They have this nice add-on for the size chat, which is a nice little touch, just makes it super easy, super easy, super easy for anybody coming on this store to see exactly what size they need. In terms of the actual product images themselves, I'm not a big fan of them, to be honest. They're used in different colors. There's no mention of the actual brand is themselves. So it just goes to show that even if you're using very basic images, these are probably imported across. In fact, these ones you can see, they've put their actual brand in on, which is a lot better, I'm a big fan of this. What they've also done is they've trademarked the name MagicTubby, which gives off that impression of a original seller of the product, original design of the product, original manufacturer, and therefore it kind of establishes them as the brand leader, if you like, for the product. We can also see they have numerous add-ons from the debutify theme, this one to kind of create scarcity. We've mentioned the size chart. They have these different bundle offer upsells, and these ones here are called product bullet points. Moving on to where we can source this product, what you need to search for on AliExpress is Dogpaw Cleaner. You can see there's multiple different variations, so I'll leave it up to you to decide which one it is that you want to sell, and whether you try and go for one that's as similar as possible to MagicTubby. But we can see that you can source these. Let's choose one with a decent amount of orders. So we'll sort by orders, and we'll go for the one that has the most. We can see they're offering free shipping, so at the very most, I think these guys are one of the most expensive, two, $9, $11, $12, $18. So I think it depends on which one you go for, but even at $9, these guys were selling it for $30. You're still making in excess of $20 per sale, which is enough room to make a profit on the front end. With the pet niche, it goes without saying there's tons and tons of other products which you can use as upsells to bump up that profit margin even further. And so with that being said, to finish the video off, let's go through the numbers. The beauty of videos on Facebook is Facebook will actually tell you exactly how many views the video has. We can start with that, and we can get a much more accurate representation of truly how much money this Facebook ad has actually made. So we can start with 7.2 million. I think that's right. So 7.2 million, and we can times this by our click-through rate of 2%, with a product like this and the pet niche is gonna be a lot higher, but will be conservative. So 0.02, which gives us approximately 144,000 link clicks. On this product, we can times this, of course, by the conversion rate. Again, with the cheap products like this, $30. I used to sell pet products in the past. This was going back a couple of years to be fair of conversion rates of like 7%. Nowadays, it's in and around sort of five. So I'm gonna go for 4%. Again, that's still quite conservative in my opinion. If I had to guess, it's probably a lot higher than that. But either way, let's go for 0.04% and see how many orders that translates into, which is 5,760 orders. We can times this by the selling price of $30. I would guess they have some upsells. I think $30 was for the smallest size as well. So again, this is being super, super conservative, which gives us a total revenue generated of $172,800. Given my experience of products like this and this particular niche, if I had to guess, if I was a betting man, I'd probably double that figure, to be honest. So again, if you are looking for a product to test that's current verified and it's gonna sell well all year round, more so here in the UK through the winter months, although to be honest here in the UK, there's no such thing as summer really. There's always gonna be those days which a dog gets wet and muddy and therefore it's probably gonna be a good product that sells all year round. And so with that being said then guys, I'm gonna wrap the video up there. If you're still watching, I really do appreciate it. Thank you very much. Make sure you let me know if you are still watching by either hitting a like on this video or leaving a comment down below. Want to find a quick message before you go if you are looking for a mentorship with myself, somebody to kind of take you from scratch from day one, literally without anything, start from scratch from the ground up and hold your hand through the entire Shopify dropship and building process. And in 60 days, build a business that's bringing in sales on a consistent basis every single day. Make sure you check out my e-com accelerator program. It is quite exclusive due to the amount of time I put into each and every person. We are currently full, but there is a waiting list. So if you do want to get a notification of when those spaces open up, make sure you join it. If you want me to send over the link for more information, just leave a comment down below of accelerator and I'll reply to your comment with the correct link and information. Thanks again for watching guys and see you in the next one.


Ready? Pull up the road. Try to call a master in scare. It's not supposed to feel good. Yeah, you're going to need my instructions. UAS on us. So we're going to tuck in the dead ones. We're going to load up.


Well, Bitcoin hit $25,000. That's one of the questions that we got yesterday on our live stream, and we wanted to bring you guys the answer to that question. Of course, from our perspective, we show you guys exactly what we're currently watching on the charts, what the charts is telling us, and where we think the price is going from here. In this video, we also discussed while we're currently not looking at outcoins and what we can expect for the rest of the week with the option expirations coming on Friday. Stay tuned, guys. This is not Ether Daily, this is Bitcoin Daily, where we only look at Bitcoin, nothing else. I'm just playing, bro. But for the most part, Ethereum's just following Bitcoin. Ethereum's going to mimic Bitcoin basically in an exaggerated sense. So whatever Bitcoin does, it will do plus a little bit more. So for example, today, Bitcoin's down 4%, so Ethereum's down almost 6%. Yesterday, Bitcoin was up like 12% or something like that, so Ethereum was up like 26%. So Ethereum, there's really no point in looking at the chart, because a chart for Ethereum or any other outcoin for that matter, it does not matter. Chart for outcoins right now, guys, do not matter. Why don't they matter? Because they all look exactly the same. Look at every single chart. It all looks exactly the same. There's literally zero point in looking at a outcoin chart right now, because they all, one, they all look the same. Two, they're all following Bitcoin. So there is zero point in analyzing any outcoins right now. Until we get out of this, every single chart, as you can see, I'm running through all the charts, they all look exactly the same, okay? So that's why we're not looking at outcoins, guys, because all the charts are exactly the same. They're all following one coin. The one coin is Bitcoin. They all follow Bitcoin. So there's zero point in looking at any other chart, because they're all just going to follow Bitcoin. Until we get out of this, there's zero, you're just wasting your time, you're trying to analyze an outcoin. Looking to buy at 25K or less, I recommend that you start buying. You start dollar cost averaging, because usually when people are waiting for a specific number, it never comes. When Bitcoin hit 10K last year, everybody was waiting for it to go back down to 6,000, to 7,000, then it never went down. It went up to 15,000, then those same people, they decided, okay, I'll wait for it to come back down to 10,000. It never went down. Then it got to 20,000. It hit the new all-time high. And people are like, all right, now at 20,000, it's definitely going to come back down to 15,000, so I'm going to wait there. It never went down. Then it went to 25, the same people said, all right, I'm going to wait for it to come back to 20, because it has to come back to 20. It never went down. Then it went up past 30,000. People said, oh, it's going to come back to 20,000. 25,000 didn't go down. So don't be waiting around for a specific number to make a lump sum entry. I recommend dollar cost averaging. If you think it's going to hit 25K, that's fine. Keep the majority of your money ready in the event that that happens, but what's your plan if that doesn't happen? You have to have a plan if you're wrong. Always have a plan for if you're wrong because most of the time, you're not going to be right. So you need to have a plan in the event that you're wrong. That's how you make money. You have to look at events. You have to look at everything from every perspective and be prepared for whether it does what you think it might do or if it does the complete opposite of what you think it might do. Either way, you want to be able to make money. If your mind is set on if you're only buying at 25K, you're going to miss the boat most of the time.  So I recommend dollar cost averaging starting now. We're already down 50% from all-time highs. How much lower do you expect the prices to go? So I would recommend dollar cost averaging starting now. If it goes down to 25K, then put a bigger amount of money in. If it doesn't, you have skin in the game, you're making profits regardless. So I wouldn't say to wait for 25K because that's not a likely scenario. On Friday, which is a 28th, that's the day that the option contracts will expire. So if we take a look back at every time the option contracts have expired, let's take a look back, guys. Remember, I based all my decisions based on history. I don't make decisions based on what people on YouTube say. I don't base decision based on what other analysis say. I don't base my decisions based on what people on TV say, you know, or on Instagram. I do the research myself. I base my decisions off of history. Last month on option expiration date, Bitcoin went up 10%. In March, option expiration date, Bitcoin went up 7%. Let's see, what is the other day? In February, I think the expiration date, I think was the 28th, let me see. No, for the 28th was a Sunday. So it would have had to have been the 26th. So not much happened on the 26th, but a few days after expiration on that Monday, the following Monday, Bitcoin went up 9.8%. In January, on the day of expiration, Bitcoin went up 10%. And you just keep going back, right? On December, on the expiration date, Bitcoin went up 7%. In November, expiration date, Bitcoin went up 8%. So if you guys keep going back, you're gonna see the same thing. So based off of history, on Friday, we should see a green day. If we don't see it on Friday, then we should expect it on Monday. So that, if on average, looking back at all of those, on average, the average was what? 8% return, 8% move to the upside. So we expect an 8% move. Let's say that we stay in this range, right? Let's say we stay at wherever we are right now. We're at 30, let's say we stay at 38,000. So we put, we say, okay, we're gonna have a 8% move. That'll take us right to basically 40,000, 42,000, right? That's basically where that would lead us to. If we get a 10% move, that'll take us directly to 42K. Now what did I say? If you guys watched yesterday's video, I told you guys, 42K is a short squeeze area. That's where I'm looking for a short squeeze right now. I think if we get above 42,000, we're gonna squeeze out a lot of people that are in short positions.  Excuse my French. I think if we get to above 42, we're gonna squeeze all those short positions. They're all gonna have to close their positions. People are gonna get liquidated and we could run back up to 48 to $50,000. Upside or the downside. Now, which way I'm looking for the pop is to the upside. Why am I looking to the upside? Because of the patterns currently. So we have a falling wedge pattern that we've broken out of. Then we also, on the same chart, we have a bull flag. Bull flag means continuation to the upside. Then we also have, we have the wicks to the downside, kind of a sense of exhaustion, kind of a signal of exhaust, the price is exhausted of going down, basically running out of sellers. Then we have the volume decreasing. So that's usually a reversal signal as well. So, and then if you look back on history, you can see that anytime we've had a falling wedge, we've broken up, broke up, broke up. Also, we have on Friday, Friday we have option contracts expiring. So that's another reason for the price to go up because if you guys look back at any time the options have expired, usually on that day or around those days it moves an average of around 8%. We get around 8% move to the upside usually if you look back through the last six months. So if you put all of that together, it tells you that this week we should be green, we should see the prices continue to rise potentially. Thank you guys so much for watching today's video. This was a recap from yesterday's live stream where we got a lot of really interesting questions and we felt that we wanted to make sure to get this information out to all of you beautiful people to hopefully make all of us some profits. So make sure to smash the like button guys. If you have any questions, drop it in the comments and remember, if you wanna win on Friday, you gotta comment on the video. If you guys are new, smash the subscribe button guys and turn on that post notification bell. Alrighty guys, I'll see you on the next one. As always, peace and love.


Welcome. This is Melissa Armo with the stock swishing and reviewing Tesla. Guess what? Tesla got down today We shorted it. This was the stocks which she'll play the day also called and put it in a perfect timing in a holiday week Any holiday week in a short week in the market You have to be make sure you get the move on of that day or the next day I'm telling you 24 to 48 hours and right now in this environment I honestly think the fast trades there's no other way to go like there is no other way to make money Right now in my opinion other than trading fast You were getting caught in the riptides of all the scuttlebutt of every single piece of economic data that comes out Every single person that talks from the Fed every commentator on TV that says this that the other thing I mean the long story short of it is that you've got to make money today tomorrow This week, that's all that matters whether it's $500 a thousand dollars $2,000. I wasn't talking about this a room I said 50 cents. I'll take it a dollar will take it We ended up getting a good move with this. I gotta have a longer, but you know again hindsight 2020 and I don't even care I want to be done quick and we were today Stock close to your gap down closed on Friday at 207 46 boom open in the morning at 199 99 91. This was on News okay, this was a news gap. I do gas for news earnings sector gaps market everything Anyways close to your gap down rally We had a good entry in this snug as a bug got it got the drop again It kept going but we were done so early today So early and that is the way I like it and I will continue to do that tomorrow We have been on a hot streak in the room winning days every day every day for the last two weeks So I don't know 10 1112 days in a row So I got to keep it up got to keep it up. I've become more focused in this market I want to even say almost hyper focused like if you're crossing the street like a busy street in New York With a lot of traffic. We have to watch for cars returning. I mean, that's how I feel But I can be perfect for 30 minutes a day 30 minutes a day. I can be perfect and I was today So if you'd like more information on how I find these picks and get the entries and if you want to participate And be in the room that email me and Melissa the stocks wish calm. I'm doing a special I love New York special perfect special for this week actually Spring New York everything fabulous and beautiful. I'm headed out right now and take a walk my first nighttime walk What shouldn't say nighttime? It's like dusk And I'm gonna see all the activity out and about tonight Anyways, have a great night everyone if you're interested in more information email me and Melissa at the stocks wish dot com


So let's move on to the concept of diameter of a parabola Diameter of a parabola So how do you define a diameter of a parabola? So basically diameter is defined as the locus of the middle points Or the midpoints of a system of parallel chords Which is called the diameter So it's the locus of the midpoints of a system of parallel chords Which we call as the diameter So let us take a situation Let's say we have some set of parallel chords And you connect their midpoints And you connect their midpoints So you get a line like this That line will be called the diameter of this parabola Let's say all these lines are having a slope of m So m is the slope of these lines Then prove that Prove that the equation of the diameter is The equation of the diameter is y is equal to 2a by m Where m is the slope of the parallel chords Which the diameter is bisecting Please do that Please do this question Please type done if you are able to solve this Remember you are finding the locus of the midpoints of these chords Having a slope of m So h, k is the midpoint of the chord Rohan, Lalitha, Atmesh Any idea? Okay, very simple Just proceed from the concept of the equation of the chord whose midpoint is known We know that the equation of the chord whose midpoint is known is t equal to s1 So this is your t equal to s1 So s1 will be k square minus 4ah Now according to the given question This line has a slope of m So what is the slope of this line If somebody asks you what is the slope of this line So you will say let me write the line as y equal to mx plus c So you will write it something like this So y is equal to 2a by k Plus this entire thing Which is actually k square minus 2ah by k Now this is going to be the slope This is going to be the slope So compare that with m So we will get m as 2a by k And now when we generalize it we write m as equal to 2a by y Which means y is equal to 2a by m Would be the equation of the diameter Would be the equation of the diameter This would be the equation of the diameter Guys why I am asking you to derive this Is because indirectly it is a locus question Correct So you should be very very well versed How to deal with locus Is it clear please type CLR if it is clear So basically as you can see here That the line is parallel to the axis of the parabola Yes or no So y is equal to 2am is basically Parallel to the axis of the parabola Now there are not many questions based on this So we will directly move on to the concept of Pole and polar So we will move on to the concept of pole and polar Again the concept remains the same As what we had discussed in case of a circle So I will repeat it once again quickly So let's say there is a point X1 Y1 which can be inside Or outside the parabola Let's say this is point X1 Y1 Through this point if you draw infinitely Many quads let's say I draw these two quads And at the ends of these two quads Let's say you draw tangents At the ends of these two quads Let's say you draw tangents Then you would realize that The end points of these all tangents Will start meeting on a line They will start meeting on a line like this And this point is what we call as the pole And this line is what we call as the polar Okay Remember your pole can be outside the parabola as well Let's say you have a situation like this Where the point is outside Let's say this is the point X1 Y1 Now from this point if I draw multiple tangents Multiple quads I am sorry not tangents Multiple quads Let me take this point over here Yeah Let's say this chord you have drawn Then you have drawn another chord like this Okay And at the ends of these quads If you draw tangents If you start drawing tangents Let's say this will cut further somewhere Okay And just roughly drawing the figure And when you connect all these points You would realize that they will lie on the straight line They will lie on the straight line Let me show that with green Okay So this green line would be called as your polar For this pole Okay So now what is the equation of this polar Equation of the polar is given again as T equal to 0 So the same equation T equal to 0 Is now being used for the third time The first time it was used when X1 Y1 was on the parabola And it represented the equation of the tangent Right So remember T equal to 0 represent three things If X1 Y1 is on the parabola It represents the tangent It becomes a tangent When X1 Y1 is inside the parabola It becomes polar And when X1 Y1 is outside the parabola It becomes polar Or it can become chord of contact Or it can become chord of contact Remember chord of contact will coincide with the polar So if I make a chord of contact over here Okay Then this chord of contact that is the white line Will coincide with the polar So chord of contact and polar will be having the same equation Is that fine? So guys we will take some questions But before that we will take two quick properties Which are very obvious ones First being Tangent is the polar of its point of contact Is the polar of its point of contact That means if your pole is X1 Y1 That means if your pole is X1 Y1 And you are drawing a tangent at X1 Y1 Then the tangent itself will behave as the polar Okay So if the point X1 Y1 lies on the circle On the parabola Then the tangent itself This will act as your polar for this pole Next important property is Polar of the focus is the directrix Polar of the focus is the directrix Can you prove it quickly? Polar of the focus is the directrix So if you take the pole as A comma 0 Then polar will be X plus A equal to 0 Can you prove this? Done If you are done piece type done on your screen On your chat box It should take you not more than 5 seconds to solve this problem Done? Yeah, it's very simple All you have to use is T equal to 0 That is Y Y1 is equal to 2A X plus X1 Remember this is your X1 This is your Y1 So it will be Y into 0 Is equal to 2A X plus A That clearly implies X plus A equal to 0 Okay Let's take a question on this And then we will take a break Small break So the question based on polar and polar is this Again a locus question Show that the locus of the poles Of normal chords Of Y square is equal to 4A X X plus 2A Times Y square plus 4A cube equal to 0 Show that the locus of the poles of the normal chords Of Y square is equal to 4A X Is given by X plus 2A times Y square plus 4A cube equal to 0 So basically you have to find the locus of the poles Which are generating normal chords So these are polar So if polar is a normal chord Then what is the locus of the pole? That's what the question asks If normal chord is your polar Then what is the locus of pole? It's a very very simple question Please attempt this If done please write done on the chat box Okay So let's discuss this very simple again Let's say the pole is H comma K Okay Now if pole is H comma K The polar will be what? So let the pole be H comma K The polar will be what? Polar will be T equal to 0 Correct So I can say YK Is equal to 2A X plus H YK is equal to 2A X plus H Okay Now try to compare this with the equation of a normal We all know the equation of the normal is Y plus TX is equal to 280 Plus 80 cube Now according to the question these two things are the same The polar is the normal chord Or the normal chord normal means the same thing Correct So their coefficient should be proportional to each other Right So let me write this equation as Y is equal to 2A X by K Plus 2A H by K Okay So let's compare the coefficient now So if I compare the coefficients I can clearly see that T will be equal to 2A by K And 280 plus 80 cube will be equal to 2A H by K Correct Okay So all you need to do is substitute T over here Which implies 2A into 2A by K Plus 80 cube is equal to 2A H by K So let's simplify it 4A square by K And here I will have 8A to the power 4 by K cube Equal to 2A H by K Or you can drop a factor of 2A from everywhere So you can drop a factor of 2A from everywhere So 2A by K Plus 4A square Sorry 4A cube By K cube 2A H by K So drop a K also from everywhere down Just one minute guys Oh one small mistake Minus T was that Yeah minus sign will come over here Minus sign will come over here as well I'm so sorry I did a mistake in the sign That's why I was wondering it's not matching with the answer Okay yeah Now if you simplify this You are going to get 4A square Plus 2A Plus H times K square Equal to 0 4A cube by the way Yeah That means your equation can be written as This 2A is gone right So this 2A will not be there Sorry yeah So it can be written as X plus 2A times Y square plus 4A cube Equal to 0 Is that fine guys


What's up everyone? It's your girl Kenzie here from Leighton Sports Cards and I'm ripping a couple of Personals here for Chad C. We've got a box of 2020 Top's Chrome Sapphire Update as well as a box of 2021 Top's Chrome Sapphire Update. All right, best of luck here Chad. Thanks for your order and for your patience. Let's see what we can get you. I want to start with 2021. Let's see some big rookie auto. Come on. Again, every single one of these cards will get sleeves and top loaded. Yeah, no problem. Wade, Galvis, Jake Lam and rookie debut, Alec Boehm. Rookie of Owen Miller. We've got our auto up next for the D-Backs. A rookie auto of Geraldo Perdomo. Perdomo on the rookie auto there for you. These are so little. Combrants and Clark Schmidt on the debut. Bradley Rojas and a Luis Petino rookie. There's Chad Cool, Chad Green and Charlie Morton. Tate Paxton Matmore and a Horhama Tail rookie. Padrex, Rich Hill. We've got green rookie of Kyle Finnegan. He's green. That is 30 out of 50. First color out of the box in Glacius and a Gutierrez rookie. Couple packs left out of 2021. Then we'll get into your 2020 for you. Okay. And debut, Kiebert Ruiz. Last pack of 2021 here for you, Chad. Cool. A Keaton Thompson rookie cubs. Rookie of Tyler Ivy for these Stroze and Casey Mines rookie debut. All right. Time for 2020 update series. Good luck. Andola Garcia. We've got Jose Parraza. It looked different for a second. Javi Baez on the All-Star game and Robinson Cano. Parano with Blanc. CJ Cron and a Linda Blum rookie auto. Rodriguez. Thompson. A Wilmer Flores and a Aroldis Chapman. Arnaud. We've got Jump on Six. Washington. Glamour Torres All-Star game and Greg Hollins. Terrence Gore. A Schwindler. Rookie. Our auto out of 25. We've got Rookie Orange for the Pirates James Marvel. James Marvel to 25 on the Orange Ice. Justin Verlander. Giorgo. Chris Sale. San Antela. Packs left. Got another Orange coming up each year on the All-Star game. We've got Red. Steve Siecek. That is four of five White Sox. I saw Orange down here. I thought it was Orange. She got me on that one. Nice Red. There you go Chad. That's sick. Beautiful Red. Thanks for subbing video game. Christian Yelich and last class here for you. Alex Reyes. Jordan Montgomery. Jansen. Boba Shet rookie. There's a nice one. debut. Boba Shet. Blue looks nice with the Toronto. And a Mike Montgomery. All right Chad. That'll do it for your two boxes. Congrats on those hits. And we'll be giving these right out to you.


Hey what's up everybody, welcome to tomorrow. This week I wanted to talk about the Google Lunar X Prize and some exciting updates over the past few weeks and months that will ensure that more teams are still allowed to compete in the race to land on the moon and hopefully win that $20 million cash prize before the deadline. This is your space pod for December 7th, 2016. So first off, we need to give a little bit of back history in order to explain the looming deadline at the end of this year, which will determine how many of the 16 remaining teams will still be allowed to compete for the final deadline of December 31st, 2017 and win the possible prizes. When the Google Lunar X Prize was first announced in 2007, the original deadline was the end of 2012. But then that deadline was extended again to 2014 and then 2015, 2016 and finally to 2017. However, when it was extended to 2017, there was the exception that at the time that extension was made back in March of 2015, that at least one of the Google Lunar X Prize teams had to have a verified launch contract to send their lander slash rover to the moon by the end of that year, 2015. With this new rule, if none of the teams were able to have a verified launch contract by the end of 2015, then the competition would be over. But thankfully, the first team that was able to produce a verified launch contract was the Israeli team, SpaceIL. With the support of two large investment groups and the Israeli government, SpaceIL announced in October of 2015 that they secured a launch contract with SpaceX on one of their Falcon 9 rockets for a late 2017 launch and with that, the Google Lunar X Prize was able to continue. Now, in December of 2015, the Google Lunar X Prize was able to verify a second launch contract and this time it was for a United States based team, Moon Express. Moon Express was able to secure a contract with New Zealand's Rocket Lab on their Electron rocket, which is hopefully going to have its maiden flight here in the next coming months. But now I want to get to this year, 2016. The Google Lunar X Prize has a new requirement for the remaining teams. This requirement is that those teams that still wish to compete in this race have to have a verified launch contract by the end of this year, December 31, 2016, just a few weeks away. And if they don't have a verified launch contract, then they're out of the competition. No more extensions were made to the final deadline to win this entire race. That deadline is still December 31, 2017. But a couple more teams have been able to secure their launch contracts this year in order to stay into the competition and the first team that did so this year came as a little bit of a surprise to me. The team I'm talking about is Synergy Moon. It was in August of this year that Synergy Moon announced that they had a verified launch contract with Interorbital Systems, which is actually a startup that is part of Synergy Moon. And their plan is to launch on their Neptune 8 rocket. Their Neptune rockets are liquid-fueled sounding rockets. They plan to cluster together O-Trag style in order to have something powerful enough to send a small payload to the Moon. Their business plan after this competition is to launch CubeSats into low-Earth orbit in several different configurations of their Neptune rockets. The next team with a verified launch contract, which was only announced last week, is India's Team Indus, launching with ISRO, the Indian Space Research Organization. And they'll be launching on one of their PSLV rockets as a dedicated payload. That's just awesome and it makes Team Indus the fourth team that will be able to remain in the Google Lunar XPRIZE competition. Now I also wanted to mention that another team, the Germany-based part-time scientists, have announced that they have a launch contract through Spaceflight Industries. And Spaceflight Industries hasn't announced who the launch provider would be yet. Spaceflight Industries is actually the middleman who was able to book the SpaceX flight for the Israeli team, SpaceIL, on the Falcon 9 rocket. And not only can they book flights on the Falcon 9 rocket, they can also book flights on Orbital ATK's Antares rocket, as well as the Russian Soyuz 2 rocket, and the Ukrainian Dnieper rocket. So any of those could potentially work for part-time scientists, but it hasn't yet been verified by the Google Lunar XPRIZE. So as of me filming this, that launch contract hasn't been verified yet. And they announced that back on November 29th, just recently. So I really hope that for their sake that that launch contract is able to be verified and they're able to continue next year. Because I hate to play favorites, but I really like part-time scientists. I like all the teams, who am I kidding? So in summary, with four possibly five teams that have verified launch contracts out of the remaining 16 teams still in the competition, the future of the other teams could be up in the air. Originally, there were 33 teams that fully registered to participate in the Google Lunar XPRIZE. And of a lot of those teams that have withdrawn already, some of them merged with or were acquired by other teams. For example, Moon Express acquired Rocket City Space Pioneers and Next Giant Leap. And the Israeli team, SpaceIL, merged with a United States team, Odyssey Moon. But some of the other teams that have withdrawn, some of them have continued to work as a space company, but most of them are now defunct. Of the remaining teams that don't secure a verified launch contract, and I'm really hoping we see a lot more announcements before the end of this year, but for the teams that don't get a verified launch contract, I really hope that they're able to continue in some commercial way or merge with one of the other teams so that they can pull their resources and talent together so that one of these teams actually win this competition. That's what I want more than anything is for someone to win this competition. But honestly, I'm getting really excited for 2017. And I'm really hoping that the Google Lunar XPrize will be one of the biggest space highlights of next year. But which team are you rooting for the most? I'm rooting for all of them so much and maybe you guys are too, but do you have any favorites and of the remaining teams, which ones do you really hope get a verified launch contract so that they can continue in the race next year? And also, if their contract gets verified, which Rocket do you think that part-time scientists will be launching on? Let me know in the comments section below. I'm going to end this video here, but I would like to invite you to connect with us on all of our social media pages and share your thoughts about the Google Lunar XPrize and your predictions for who might win. Just share all of your thoughts about it there and let's get a conversation going. Tomorrow is a crowdfunded show through Patreon. And I would like to thank all of our patrons, especially new patrons, whose continued support allows us to keep making these videos. Every little bit helps to create content that you want to see and I am very grateful to each and every one of you for your contributions. Now if you would like to support the show, please visit Patreon.com slash Spacepod for more information and to sign up at whatever level that you feel is appropriate. Thank you very much for watching this video. My name is Michael Clark. Keep moving onwards and upwards everybody and I will see you in the future.


Whenever I try to communicate with Minnie, she insists that we are just two mugs which raises the interesting question. Are there any differences between men and women when it comes to personality disorders? And this is today's topic. Are there any differences between men and women and are there any differences between the same gender with the same disorder? For example, borderline women and borderline men, but also borderline women and narcissistic women. So are there gender differences inside the same diagnosis and other gender differences between diagnosis? And so before I go there, tomorrow, Richard Granum and I are going to launch a new event intended to torture you. Even more than we have done in the past few years. It's a joint questions and answers session. You can ask the questions and we are going to try to provide the answers. And even when we don't know the answer, we're going to pretend that we know the answer. We're going to fake it till we make it. If you don't believe me, join us tomorrow. So there's a link in the description. Click on the link and join the studio. You'll be able to post questions. We won't be able to answer all your questions. The event will be limited to two hours, but it will be a joint event. The inimitable Richard Granum and the horror show Sam Vaknin. Don't miss it for the world. Resign your job. Leave your family. Divorce if you have to travel far and wide. Just be with us tomorrow. And as promised, we will get straight to the issue of gender and personality disorders. Allow me just to find my text. Here it is. The most important thing to understand is that the variation, the intra, intra diagnostic variation is higher than the inter diagnostic variation. Now, that's the kind of thing that academics likes, like to say, because they know that no one will understand the world. And that makes them feel superior, omniscient and Godlike. Intra diagnostic variation simply means variation between diagnosis. So for example, borderline woman versus narcissistic woman. They are both women. But what is going to trump, excuse me for the expression, what is going to trump what is gender going to trump diagnosis or is diagnosis going to trump gender. Intra diagnostic variation between diagnosis. And then there is inter diagnostic variation. For example, borderline women versus borderline men. They both share the same diagnosis, but they have different gender. Well, until recently. Anyhow, it seems that intra diagnostic variation, the variation between diagnosis is higher than inter diagnostic variation. To translate this into colloquial English, a borderline man would be almost the same like a borderline woman. A narcissistic man would be almost the same like a narcissistic woman. But a borderline woman would be different to a narcissistic woman. She would also be different to a narcissistic man. And a narcissistic woman would be different to a borderline woman. And she would also be different to a borderline man. Gotit Shoshanim. My name is Sam Vaknin, I'm the author of Malignant Self-Love and Narcissism Revisited and I'm a professor of psychology. Before we go further, it's important to understand that psychology was created at the end of the 90th century by German, Austrian and much later American white males embedded in their culture and their society, rigid, hierarchical, Victorian and very misogynistic. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the diagnosis are gender-neutral. When you read the diagnostic criteria of, for example, borderline personality disorder, there is no mention there if they apply to women or they apply to men. The language is gender-neutral. Same goes for antisocial personality disorder and narcissistic personality disorder, bipolar, I mean you name it. The whole manual on purpose is gender-neutral. The message, the implicit and to my view explicit message is that gender is not a component. Gender is not a differentiating factor. Gender has no influence on how a mental illness manifests. Feminists have long criticized psychology and psychiatry as instruments of social control, a part of the famed patriarchy. Ever since Freud, there's been a debate brewing in the psychological community. The diagnosis that we are coming up with, some of them are very masculine, for example, psychopath. It's hard to imagine a woman, female psychopath, a woman psychopath, although it's possible. But the initial reaction, the kind of knee-jerk reaction, is psychopath is a man. Losses is the same, it's a man initially. Of course, within a split second we realize it's not true if there are narcissistic women, psychopathic women and so on, but the identification over the last 120 years has been so strong. The indoctrination, the brain washing has been so strong that there are intuitive, associative linkages in our mind between specific mental health disorders and gender and what the DSM is trying to communicate and the ICD and all the major diagnostic texts is that it's not true. Gender has no impact on how a disorder manifests. In a minute, we'll examine this contention critically, but before we go there, why? Why were some disorders associated mostly with women? Ever since Freud, more women than men saw therapy. To this very day, that's the case. Every YouTuber would tell you that women watch mental health content much more than men. Men are far less likely to attend therapy than women. Consequently, mental health practitioners, psychologists, therapists, psychiatrists have been exposed mostly to women. That's the fact. In other words, it's what we call in statistics a biased sample, a sample wrongly constituted. It's also a self-selecting sample.  They think they have a problem. So when they approach mental health practitioners, these women would tend to communicate that something is wrong with them, with the women, not with the practitioner.  And that tended to have a mild impact on how we have construed psychology over the generations. Terms like, for example, hysteria. They're intimately connected to female physiology, because hysteria comes from the Greek word for womb. Alleged female psychology. Women are hysterical. The DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, which is the Bible of the psychiatric profession, expressly professes gender bias. Personality disorders such as borderline and histrionic are supposed to be more common among young women. And no, I am not contradicting myself. The language used to describe the disorders is gender neutral. But when you read the description, the analysis of the disorder, later on, when you go from the diagnostic criteria to a description of what we know about the disorder, suddenly you come across sentences such as narcissistic personality disorder is 75% diagnosed among men. That's in the DSM3. Or you come across sentences like histrionic personality disorder is much more common among women. So the diagnostic texts themselves are gender neutral. But then in the back door, through the back door, the DSM openly and overtly is sexists. It is sexist because the claims made by the DSM are unqualified and consequently they are wrong. It is wrong to say that a certain personality disorder is associated more than women and not to mention that women self-diagnose and then approach mental health practitioners in numbers which are much louder than men. The context is crucial, critical. The DSM is aware, the DSM5, the latest edition, latest iteration is aware of this and they have tried to balance the scales. So for example, they changed the text from 75% of people with narcissistic personality disorder are men. They changed it and now it's 50 to 75% are men, etc., etc. They've changed the language in many, many diagnostic criteria and the description.  And they have alluded that these are more common among men but possibly this is the outcome of misrepresentation in clinical settings. Why is this gender disparity even behind the scenes, even through the back door? There are few possible answers. Maybe personality disorders are not objective clinical entities, for example like tuberculosis or cancer. Maybe personality disorders are culture-bound syndromes, syndromes that reflect societal and cultural mores, edicts and expectations. In other words, maybe they reflect biases, maybe they reflect value judgments embedded in a specific context, time in history and place on the globe. Some patriarchal societies, for example, societies where men dominate are also highly narcissistic. They emphasize qualities such as individualism and ambition, often identified with virility, aggression. The preponderance of pathological narcissism among men can easily be attributed to the expectations of society from men to how society molds boys into men in the twin processes of socialization and acculturation. We may be breeding narcissism among men but it doesn't mean that men are biologically or psychologically predisposed to being narcissists more than women do. Women, on the other hand, are widely believed to be emotionally labile, clingy, needy, dependent and this is why most borderlines and dependence happen to be female. This is not biology, this is not even psychology. This is culture, this is society and as culture and society are changing and women have become a lot more masculine. We have seen an explosion of diagnosis such as narcissistic personality disorder and psychopathy among women. Today 50% of all narcissism diagnosis are female and 50% of all borderline diagnosis are among men, upbringing and environment, the process of socialization, cultural mores, expectations, dictates on how to behave, sexual scripts, social scripts, they all play an important role in the pathogenesis of personality disorders. These views are not fringe views by the way, what I'm saying right now. There are serious scholars for example Kaplan and Bantoni who claim that the mental health profession is inherently sexist and then again we cannot completely ignore the genetic and to some extent physiological difference between female bodies and male bodies and if we are not dualists, if we believe that the brain has something to do with psychology, that they are one and the same in effect, the mind and the brain are one and the same, then it raises questions. Genetics may be at work, physiology may be at work. Men and women do differ, they do differ as far as their bodies go. Does this mean that this difference is translated into the mind? It may account for the variability of the occurrence of specific personality disorders among men and women. It's another hypothesis which has to be tested. Some of the diagnostic criteria are ambiguous or even considered to be normal by the majority of the population. So you could read a lot of diagnostic texts in the likes of the DSM or even in college textbooks where if you ask the majority of people in the street they would say nothing's wrong with that, I do that, my neighbor does that, my wife does that, my children do that, my boss does this, I mean I have no problem with that. Consider for example what the DSM says about histrionic personality disorder. The DSM says that histrionics consistently use physical appearance to draw attention to themselves. No kidding, who doesn't? Women and men today are doing this. Who doesn't in western society at least? Why? When a woman clings to a man it is labeled codependency or borderline but when a man relies on a woman to maintain his home, take care of his children, choose his attire, prop his ego, soothe him and comfort him, this is not liability, this is not clinging, this is not codependency, it's companionship. Walker in 1994 analyzed text, text, psychological text and had shown this double standard, this sexism. Female behavior is always characterized negatively. The same identical behavior on the part of men is characterized charitably, positively. The less structured the interview, the more fuzzy the diagnostic criteria, the more the diagnostician relies on stereotypes according to Whitaker in 1998. So let's examine one case. I've received a question whether borderline women differ to narcissistic women and I'm going to dedicate a special video to that but today I would like to discuss the differences between female narcissists and male narcissists. Everyone and his dog seem to claim that female narcissists are very different to male narcissists. They imply in the background that they are more vicious somehow, more passive aggressive and so on and so forth. Is there any clinical support for this? No, there is none actually, no clinical support for this. In my view all these videos, even videos made by women, which imply that female narcissists are worse, more egregious than male narcissists, all these videos reflect misogyny because they don't rely on any studies or scholarly literature. Throughout my early writings, because I started this whole racket in 1995 and for 10 years I've been the only voice on narcissism online. I've maintained the only website and the only six and all of the six available support groups and initially when I had written my texts I was under the influence of the DSM and other psychology textbooks at the time and I kept using the male third person singular because at the time most people diagnosed with narcissistic personality 75% were male. Today it's more like 50-50 and but even then I insisted and I still insist to this very day, nothing in 26 years has changed my mind, that there is little difference between the male and the female narcissists. In the manifestation of their narcissism in the ways that the narcissism is expressed outwardly to a layman observer, female and male narcissists inevitably do tend to differ but they tend to differ because they operate in different environments, not because they are different, not because the disease is different, the disorder is different, not because the etiology, the reason for the disorder, not because the dynamics of the disorder, the psychodynamics are different, none of this is different. Male and female narcissists are indistinguishable as far as their psychology or psychopathology. This is especially true in today's day and age when women have become men, we have unigender, women describe themselves today exclusively in what used to be masculine terms, they regard themselves as men, they see no difference between themselves and men in any way, shape, form or field. So this is the ethos of society nowadays and of course today the distinctions between male and female in any field, let alone in clinical and abnormal psychology, is blurring. The differences are reasonable, many women would mock texts written 25 years ago describing how females are different to males. But females and males do emphasize different things in life, do have different priorities, do look out for different signs and signals from the environment and from others, so yes their narcissism outwardly manifests differently, they transform different elements of their personalities and of their lives into the cornerstones of their disorder. Women for example tend to concentrate on their bodies, many women have body image problems, body dysmorphic disorders, many women somatize psychological problems when they are depressed, when they are anxious, they have strong somatic symptoms, many women suffer from eating disorders, anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa and so on, this is much more common among women than among men, it seems that women emphasize the body more, they flaunt their bodies, they exploit their physical charms, their sexuality, their socially and culturally determined femininity, they secure their narcissistic supply through their more traditional gender role to this very day. So women are now proud of being sluts, they are slut walks and so on so forth, being a slut is self-objectification, converting oneself into a sexually desirable object, of course sexually desirable to men, men, the male gaze had come to define female narcissism, female narcissists adapt themselves and psychopathic women who are psychopaths and narcissists adapt themselves, had assimilated the male chauvinistic objectifying gaze and had conformed to it, indeed studies show repeatedly and clearly and beyond any doubt that promiscuous women, women who compulsively sexed and can perform sex on camera, women who are promiscuous in the sense that they are indiscriminate and they sleep with strangers and get drunk and these kind of women, numerous studies have shown, they have dark personality, personalities, they are subclinical psychopaths, they are subclinical narcissists and yet they define themselves through the male gaze, there is an inversion here, these women feel empowered because they have, they can exert power over men by conforming to male stereotypes of how an easy loose woman should look, it's a bit ironical, it's like you know leveraging the opponent's momentum against him, it's like these women are saying okay that's the way you want us, sluts you know scantily dressed from miscreants we're gonna be this way but by being this way we're gonna gain power over you, this is going to empower us, that's at least the narrative, of course it's nonsense, ultimately men, men are the big winners but this is an example of how female narcissism and female psychopathy manifest in a uniquely female way which conforms to conservative traditional gender roles actually, similarly women, even career women, even the most advanced ninth wave feminists still emphasize the home, her children, her husband, her spouses, her spouse, the stolen emphasis of domesticity and the narcissism of such a woman, of such women manifests itself in these arenas with their children who become sources of narcissistic supply, with the home she's competitive against other women, with her wardrobe, her possessions, her home, material goods and so on and so forth, these women would tend to choose careers which reflect on their grandiosity, they gravitate towards careers that enhance grandiosity and expose them to an admiring audience, it is no wonder that narcissists, both men and women, are chauvinistic and conservative, let's say irony, there is this totally false image of narcissists as libertarian, they're not, narcissists, both men and women, are actually more conservative and traditional than the rest of the population, they depend to such an extent on the opinions of people around them that with time they are transformed into ultra sensitive seismographs of public opinion, barometers of prevailing social fashions and guardians of conformity, the narcissists cannot afford to seriously alienate his constituency by being, I don't know, avant-garde, by being libertarian, by being a rebel and a reformer, he needs people around him and people are, people tend to walk away if you are too out there, if you're over the top, so the people who reflect on the narcissist, his false self, the people who help the narcissist sustain his grandiose self-image, the narcissist needs to conform to their beliefs, expectations and values, he needs to be, he needs to reflect the average traditional conservative point of view, the very proper and ongoing functioning of the narcissist's ego or ego substitute depends on the goodwill and the collaboration of his human environment, of his neighbors, his co-workers, and so he needs to be in the good graces of everyone around him, narcissists are pro-social, they are pro-social, they are communal, they are not psychopaths, it's another huge campaign of misinformation online by self-styled experts who have no idea what they are talking about, it is true that besieged and consumed by pernicious guilt feelings, some narcissists finally seek to be punished, the guilt is unconscious, narcissists are overtly, openly, eco-syntonic, they don't feel guilt, they don't feel shame, but Masterson and others have proven that narcissism is actually a reaction, a compensatory reaction to deeply embedded shame and guilt, and so narcissists are self-destructive, they are self-defeating, they seek to be punished, here too females differ from males, males seek to be punished by behaving anti-socially, by committing crimes, by getting caught, women seek to be punished mostly via their sexuality, they become sexually self-trashy, they get drunk, they sleep with a million strangers, that's a woman's way, the narcissistic woman's way, to self-pinalize and to reaffirm her self-perception is essentially bed, flawed, unworthy object, a whore, a self-destructive narcissist plays roles, the role of a bad guy or the role of a bad girl, but even then it is within the traditional socially allocated roles, to ensure social opprobrium, in other words attention, the narcissists exaggerate these roles to a caricature at the same time, ascertaining and securing his self-annihilation, his self-negation and self-punishment, but as you see female narcissists do it with sex, male narcissists do it with aggression and anti-social behavior, a woman is likely to label herself a whore and a male narcissist to self-style himself a vicious, unrepentant criminal, these are of course exaggerations, but the variations of this are very common among narcissists, yet these again are traditional social roles, men are likely to emphasize intellect, power, aggression, money or social status, women are likely to emphasize their bodies, looks, charm, sexuality, feminine traits, homemaking, children and child rearing, even as they compete in the workplace, make more money than men in some age groups and so on, so the traditional gender roles still define the permissible way to express one's narcissism, a woman would express narcissism only in traditionally or socially sanctioned ways, ironically both men and women sublimate their narcissism, convert it into socially acceptable methods or methods of expressing narcissism, so as not to lose the audience, they need the audience for narcissistic supply, another difference is in the way the genders react to treatment, women are more likely to resort to therapy, treatment I mean psychotherapy, women are more likely to resort to therapy because they are more likely to admit to psychological problems and distress, but while men may be less inclined to disclose or to expose their problems to other people, that's the macho man thing, it doesn't necessarily imply that they are less prone to admit it to themselves, women are also more likely to ask for help than men, men don't ask for help, men don't cry, and yet the prime role of narcissism must never be forgotten, the narcissist uses everything around him, everyone around him to obtain his or her narcissistic supply, children for example, children happen to be more attached to the female narcissists, to the mother because of the way that society structures the fact that women are the ones who give birth, for some reason because women are the ones to carry to term and give birth, society gives them custody over the children in the majority of cases and assumes that almost automatically the children should be with the mother, so there is this linkage, unbroken linkage, mother child, child mother, mother child, so female narcissists would succumb to this unwritten social rule or to this even legal moring, she would use her children, she would leverage her children as her sources of narcissistic supply and she would think herself a good mother for doing this, it is easier for a woman to think of her children as her extensions because they once wear her extensions, her physical extensions, and because her ongoing interaction with her children is both more intensive and more extensive, and this means that the male narcissist is more likely to regard his children as a nuisance than as a source of rewarding narcissistic supply, especially as a children grow older and become autonomous and disagree with the narcissistic and criticize it, who needs this as a source of supply, devoid of the diversity of alternatives available to men, the narcissistic woman fights in order to maintain her most reliable source of supply, her children, through insidious indoctrination, guilt formation, emotional sanctions, deprivation, and other psychological mechanisms, the narcissist woman tries to induce in her children a dependence which cannot be easily unraveled, sometimes never at all, to life's end, but there is no, but this is all, these are all external manifestations, these are all behaviors, many of these behaviors are acquired behaviors and many, many women, narcissistic women, no longer conform to any of this, they remain single, they remain childless, they have a career and they don't have a home, they live in rented apartments, so their outlet for their narcissism is identical to a men's outlet for his narcissism, genitalia is equipment, it's not who you are, there is, it's important to understand that whatever the source of supply, child, children, money, intellect, it's immaterial, they're all psychodynamically indistinguishable from each other, there's no psychodynamic difference between male and female narcissists, the only difference is in choices of narcissistic supply, they are mental, they are mental disorders which afflict one sex more than the other, or at least more often, and this has to do with hormonal or other physiological dispositions, with social and cultural conditioning through the socialization process and with role assignment, role assignment through gender differentiation process, none of these seems to be, seem to be strongly correlated to the formation of malignant narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, as opposed for instance to, I don't know, bipolar disorder, seems to conform to social mores and to the prevailing ethos, mainly the ethos of capitalism actually, it's not an accident that capitalism is on the right and so is narcissism, social thinkers like Christopher Lash speculated that modern American culture, a narcissistic, self-centered culture bordering on psychopathy, increases the rate of incidence of narcissistic personality disorder, Kanberg himself said the following, the most I would be willing to say is that society can make serious psychological abnormalities which already exist in some percentage of a population seem to be at least superficially appropriate, another quote from the literature, it's from the article gender differences in the structure of narcissism, a multi-sample analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory, it was authored by Brian Chance, Caroline Morph, Charleston, and it was published in Sex Rolls, a journal of research in May 1998 and it said, I'm quoting, specifically past research suggests that exploitative tendencies and open displays of feelings of entitlement will be less integral to narcissism for females than for males, for females such displays may carry a greater possibility of negative social sanctions because they would violate stereotypical gender role expectations for women who are expected to engage in such positive social behavior as being tender, compassionate, warm, sympathetic, sensitive, and understanding. In females, exploitativeness entitlement is less well integrated with the other components of narcissism as measured by the narcissistic personality inventory, components such as leadership authority, self-absorption, self-admiration, and superiority or arrogance. In males, exploitiveness and entitlement are much more closely integrated with these factors. Male and female narcissists in general showed striking similarities in the manner in which most of the facets of narcissism were integrated with each other. Eagley Klonsky and others in Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders, meta-analysis in psychological ability in volume 111 wrote this, women leaders are evaluated negatively if they exercise their authority and are then perceived as autocratic. I also refer you to articles by Butler and Gels, non-verbal effect response to male and female leaders, and to Carly, Lafleur, Lebe, non-verbal behavior, gender, and influence in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 68, where they have written, competent women must also appear to be sociable and likable in order to influence men. Men must only appear to be competent to achieve the same results with both genders. Summary. Within the same diagnosis, there is very little difference between, within the same diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder, there's very little difference between men and women on the psychodynamic level, the processes, the psychological constructs, the etiology, the traits, they're all identical, but the way that this order manifests itself outwardly in behavior is subject to social and cultural strictures, mores, constraints, and expectations. That's what makes female narcissists look very, very different to male narcissists. More generally, the variation between men and women within diagnosis, especially behavioral variation, is much higher than the variation between diagnosis, I'm sorry, I repeat, the variation between men and women between diagnosis is much higher, especially behaviorally. The variation between men and women inside the same diagnosis is very low, almost non-existent. So men and women who are both narcissistic will be the same, but a narcissistic woman and a borderline men would be very different. A narcissistic woman and a borderline woman would be very different. There are big differences between diagnosis when it comes to gender, but there are small differences inside the same diagnosis, even when we take gender into account. Thank you girls, girls, and guys, and all of you who are in between girls and guys.