It is now time for oral questions. I recognize the Leader of His Majesty's loyal opposition. Good morning, my question is to the Premier. This side of the House has spent months trying to get to the bottom of just how widespread the alleged corruption which the RCMP is investigating goes. Public accounts revealed that the Premier's former Principal Secretary, Amin Masoudi, after leaving the Premier's office was paid nearly a quarter of a million dollars to do the same job only this time through his private company, Atlas. Yet this government has refused to answer questions on just exactly when that contract started. My question is to the Premier, when did the contract with Atlas Strategic Advisors start with the Conservative Caucus? To respond to the Government House Leader. Thank you, Mr Speaker. I appreciate the question. It's the Leader of the Opposition highlighted. This is something that was in the public accounts of the province. It is not a secret or something that was hidden, just the opposite, Mr Speaker. At the same time, we are continuing to focus on those things that matter to the people of the province of Ontario that is creating jobs, building more homes, Mr Speaker. We are seeing really extraordinary results across the province of Ontario. Some 700,000 people have the dignity of a job that didn't have that when we came to office, Mr Speaker. We continue on that path of building more jobs that are bigger, better, stronger in the province of Ontario for the people of the province of Ontario. A supplementary question? Well, Mr Speaker, let me help the Premier out here again. We understand that Mr. Massoudi is no longer employed with the Conservative Caucus. Shortly after the news broke of the Vegas boys' trip, this government quietly ended the contract. What they won't answer to this House, Mr Speaker, is when the contract started. The Premier's office told the Toronto Star that this government paid Mr. Massoudi's firm at least $237,337,300 from about July 1st, 2022 through to March 31st of this year. So back to the Premier. Can he confirm that the contract with Atlas Strategic Advisors started in July 2022? Thank you. Go ahead. Government House Speaker. Speaker Lukka, Mr. Massoudi had a contract with PCCS as do a number of others who provide services for PCCS and all of the caucuses, or the recognized caucuses here, including the leader of the opposition Speaker. At the same time, we're going to continue to do what is important, focusing on creating jobs in the province of Ontario, building a strong economy, and really doubling down and ensuring that we can build more homes across Ontario. I'm very glad to see today that the Mayor of St. Thomas is here. That is a Mayor who has undertaken extraordinary work to remove obstacles so that we can bring a massive amount of jobs to his community so that we can build homes, economic growth, Mr Speaker. That is the type of leadership that we need across the province of Ontario from our municipal partners. I'm really happy that his worship is here. We will continue to work with Mayor Preston so that we can ensure that not only St. Thomas, but all parts of Ontario can experience the exact same growth that they're going to have in St. Thomas, St. Thomas, thousands of jobs, economic growth. It's good for the people of the province. Thank you. Final supplementary. Well, Speaker, I can understand why this Premier would want to avoid the question. New documents that the NDP official opposition have obtained show that Mr. Masoudi left his role as principal secretary on August 27th, 2022. Months after this government told the Toronto Star, they were paying his private company to provide the exact same services. So Speaker, did the Premier's friend double bill the taxpayers for speech writing services because he was indeed a close friend of the Premier? No, Mr. Speaker. The next question, once again, the leader of the opposition. Yes. That's interesting. Speaker, this question is also for the Premier and that's not going to cut it, Premier. Speaker, by the way, that is not going to cut it. These are important questions and the people of this province deserve answers from this government. This question is also for the Premier. While our public services like health care and schools are crumbling across this province and housing is getting more and more out of reach, somehow this government brags about spending more than ever. So to the Premier, people who are stuck in longer and longer waits in the emergency room or being treated in hospitals, hallways want to know where is the money going. To the Premier. Well, tell the leader of the opposition where the money is going. Since we've been in office, Mr. Speaker, we've registered over 63,000 nurses. Last year was a record over 15,000 nurses and there's 30,000 in the hopper. Order. They voted against that legislation. They voted against building a new medical university up in Peel. They voted against that. Matter of fact, Mr. Speaker, backlog surgeries have dropped by 25,000 patients. But they voted against that as well. They voted against building 50 new or additions to hospitals across the province to $250 billion. Mr. Speaker, they voted against that as well. They don't believe in fixing the health care system. What they believe is the status quo under the previous two governments, the Liberals, and propped up by the NDP. Response. Not spending. Matter of fact, they fired nurses when they were working together. We're hiring thousands and thousands of nurses. That's what we're doing with the health care dollars. Waterloo will come to order. The member for Brantford Grant will come to order. Supplementary question. I'll help the Premier. You know where the money is going. It's going directly out of the public coffers and into their friends' private pockets. That's where it's going. This is a government that continues to spend more for less. New data shows that the private surgical clinics this government was so keen on expanding are charging OHIP 138% more for the same surgery. It's also making wait times longer. All while public operating rooms sit with the lights off. So back to the Premier. When will this government admit that their private for profit surgery scheme is increasing the cost of taxpayers and worsening wait times? The Premier. You know something, Mr. Speaker. You talk to anyone that's waiting for a year or two years for hip replacement or cataracts. You know, cataracts. They did 14,000 cataract surgeries taking the burden off the hospitals. And guess what, Mr. Speaker. It was all paid by the OHIP card, not by the credit card. We're continuing building on 19 common ailments resulting in 530,000 assessments less every single year. Taking the burden off the family dogs. Taking the burden off people going in and waiting in a doctor's office for over an hour to get the appointment. Now they can go to the local pharmacy making sure they have convenient care close to the home. That's what we're doing with the health care system. The final supplementary. Mr. Speaker, at four times the cost of what they could be paying in the public health care system. Operating rooms, sitting empty. Emergency rooms, closing. Affordable housing wait lists, decades long. More people with full-time jobs going to food banks than ever before. All while this government has been so preoccupied with their shady backroom deals, spending more for less in health care, 650 million speaker on a private luxury spa hoarding billions in their rainy day fund, all while Ontarians are struggling. So back to the Premier. Five years in, people are worse off now than before. The rainy day is here. When will this government finally invest to make life easier for Ontarians? I'm going to caution the Leader of the Opposition on her choice of words. Premier can respond. Mr. Speaker, I find it so ironic. We walked in, I describe it as a bankrupt company. Every single ministry was an absolute disaster. The health care system was just in full collapse until we came on board. And what are we doing for the people of Ontario? We're putting more money into people's pockets. Under their reign, there was 300,000 jobs lost in this province. There's over 700,000 more people taking home a paycheck. Being able to pay rent or pay a mortgage. We reduced, Mr. Speaker, we got rid of the tolls on the 412-418. We eliminated that sticker tax. We reduced the gas tax by 10 cents a litre. But guess what, Mr. Speaker? They voted against every single item that we did. They don't believe in saving taxpayers' money. They believe in gouging the taxpayers for every penny they have. All three of these parties, they believe in tax, tax, tax. The next question, a member for London West. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Speaker, the crisis in our post-secondary system provides yet another example of a public service that is crumbling under this government's erratic and irresponsible fiscal approach. Last week's blue ribbon panel found that Ontario's funding for post-secondary education is just half that of the rest of Canada. Eight Ontario universities have run deficits for two years in a row. Speaker, what is the Premier's plan to address the fragile and financially unsustainable situation of Ontario's colleges and universities? The Minister of Colleges and Universities. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you, Member, for that question. Speaker, the opposition can ask questions until they're blue in the face, but my answer is still the same. We are reviewing the panel's recommendations and we will look forward to working with the sector and to develop a plan that works for the long-term sustainability and success for Ontario's colleges and universities. But I want to remind everyone that the NDPs under the Liberal government let tuition skyrocket in this province. But now that a government is taking a practical approach, putting students first, and taking the time to review the recommendations, they don't want to be part of our solution. Like always, they will oppose the measures that we take to support students. They'll vote against the solutions that we bring forward and focus on playing politics. We are here to support students and to ensure financial sustainability of the post-secondary institutions for years to come. This government has slashed funding for post-secondary education, both on a per-student basis and operating funding. More and more institutions are being forced to turn to partnerships with private for-profit colleges to keep the doors open, which raises questions if this was the government's plan all along. Speaker, will the Premier commit today to ensuring that colleges and universities in Ontario will get the increased funding that they and more importantly students need to keep the sector afloat? Please take your seats. Apply the Minister of Colleges and Universities. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I cannot overemphasize the importance of ensuring that colleges and universities operate transparently and are accountable to students and the taxpayers about how their money is spent. My ministry has already begun working with institutions on a financial accountability framework that will allow for early detection of financial challenges and require immediate action to correct bad practices. In order for post-secondary to be sustainable for the long term, institutions need to take leadership and review their operations from top to bottom. From governance practices, program offerings, day-to-day operations, and everything between colleges and universities across this province need to become the best possible version of themselves. This is not a change that will happen overnight, but it is one that is necessary so that students, families and taxpayers can have confidence that every dollar being spent is allocated appropriately and with complete transparency. Thank you very much. The next question is for Bradford Brandt. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade. Great Minister. Just last week, Speaker, a Liberal member in this house said that the federal carbon tax was making life better for the people of Ontario. That could not be further from the truth. I would encourage that member to stop parroting talking points from the Prime Minister's office and Ontario Liberal leadership candidates and start talking to her constituents and businesses who are struggling because of this terrible tax. Our government understands that businesses have had a lot to deal with over the last few years, which is why we have been so steadfast in our commitment to lowering costs and persistent in our opposition to the federal government's carbon tax. Speaker, can the Minister please highlight what our government has done to lower costs for businesses across the province of Ontario? Thank you. Mr. of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade. Thank you, Speaker. While the Liberal government has been busy raising taxes and raising the burden on businesses, we've been busy, and this Premier Ford's government, cutting red tape. In fact, we've cut over 500 pieces of red tape that save over $900 million of burden on businesses each and every year. Speaker, we have lowered the workers' compensation by 50% without touching the workers' benefits. This is a savings of $2.5 billion each and every year. We allow companies now to write off their new equipment in year, saves them a billion dollars a year. This has all put a package together of saving $8 billion a year, put 700,000 people's costs. While they're busy with a carbon tax that penalizes business, we are continuing to lower costs and putting people to work. A supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker. And thank you, Minister, for that response. Our government understands the challenges that businesses are facing with high inflation and high interest rates. And that's why we have taken concrete actions to lower costs as the minister outlined. At the same time, we recognize the importance of tackling climate change. But you don't address climate change by penalizing businesses and the hardworking people of this province with a carbon tax. Speaker, can the minister please outline how unlike the federal government, we have been able to lower costs for our businesses while treating climate change seriously? Thank you. Minister of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade. Speaker, we have lowered the cost of business by $8 billion a year. That has attracted $27 billion of electric vehicle investments. 120,000 men and women are working in that sector. Speaker, that is going to produce here in Ontario. We saw General Motors have the first electric vehicles in Canadian history come off their assembly line. In Ingersoll, we are producing clean, emission-free vehicles here in Ontario. These are built with Ontario workers right here in our province. Our batteries will be 100% clean energy. You get a battery in Kentucky made with 6% clean energy, or go to Indiana, get a battery with 7% clean energy. Here in Ontario, we are making green steel, which will produce zero-emission vehicles. That is what we are doing in the province of Ontario. Thank you, Speaker. This government is planning to allow only one hour of committee hearings to discuss Bill 136, the Green Belt Statute Law Amendment Act, and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing intends to use up that entire hour. Ontarians are rightfully outraged by this government's actions on the Green Belt, so why are you blocking the public from being heard? Government House speaker. I don't know, Speaker. I think I'm a pretty entertaining guy when I get up there. I think I add value to the hearings. I think that the members opposite would want to hear from Cabinet Ministers. In fact, it was this government that made it mandatory for Cabinet Ministers to actually appear before committees to defend their bills, Speaker. I want to thank the Premier for insisting that we do that. But when it comes to the Green Belt Statute Amendment Act, Mr. Speaker, look, we've made it very clear. We've made a public policy decision that wasn't supported by the people of the province of Ontario. The opposition, I assume, is going to vote in favour of that repeal, Mr. Speaker. At the same time, it is still on the environmental registry for a 30-day consultation from people, from Indigenous communities, Speaker. There is ample opportunity for the public to participate, to have their say that will all be framed as part of the committee here, Speaker, before this House votes on Third Reading. Supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker. You know what? In Ontario, we've heard enough from Cabinet Ministers. We need to hear from the public. That's what we need in this province. And the second biggest parcel of land removed from the Green Belt was located in Hamilton. The integrity commissioner reported details about how favoured Green Belt developers in Hamilton received preferential treatment from this government. The Premier repeatedly called one of these speculators and the PC Party's fundraising chair sold this speculator tickets to the Premier's daughter, Stag and Doe. Why is the government blocking the public from participating in the Bill 136 hearings? Is it possible to avoid accountability for preferential treatment of the Premier's special Green Belt friends? Premier, I've got to answer the opposition's question. She said, we need to hear from the public. Do you know why you aren't hearing from the public? They don't give two hoots about that. I'll tell you what they care about. They care about their interest rates going up. They care about affordable homes that they block every single vote we have that makes things easier and more affordable homes. They worry about the next year or two when their interest rates get jacked up and all of a sudden they're paying three, four, five thousand dollars more a month. That's what they care about. The number one issue on every poll, independent other polls, is number one, bar none is making sure their gas is affordable hoping that the federal government will take the 14 cents of the carbon tax off the leader of gas. They care about having affordable groceries and they care about having affordable homes. Second, Mr. Speaker, in any poll, it's the economy. Making sure that they have a stable job to ensure that they have an income to buy that house, to pay that... Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Finance. Just last week, the Liberal Member for Canada Carlton said that the vast majority of Ontario households are better off with a carbon price. However, a report by the Parliamentary Budget Officer, or PBO, provides further evidence that calls her statement into question. The PBO concludes that most households will experience a net loss of income from the disastrous federal carbon tax when accounting for both direct and indirect costs. Specifically, the PBO report finds that 60% of households in Alberta, Ontario, Saskatchewan and Manitoba pay more in carbon taxes than they receive in rebates. Speaker, through you, can the Minister of Finance please provide his views regarding the impact of the disastrous carbon tax on Ontario families? Thank you. To respond, the Minister of Finance. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you to the great member from Carlton. Mr. Speaker, I want to be crystal clear to the people of Ontario, to the federal government, especially to the Liberal Member from the federal carbon tax is making life tougher and making all the areas of life more expensive for the people of Ontario and their families, Mr. Speaker. It makes the commute to the grocery store pricier. And once there, it makes the price of food more expensive, even for the member of the leader of the independent party over there. Mr. Speaker, this isn't a tax that just affects some Ontarians. This is driving up costs for the province and across the country. That is why we will not stop putting pressure on the Liberal government to do the right thing and perhaps the provincial party will join and eliminate this regressive carbon tax. The supplementary question. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you to the Minister for his response. The Parliamentary Budget Officer further states that by 2030, 80% of Ontario households will actually be worse off, not better, because of the carbon tax. And it's concerning that while you are answering your question, I was hearing the Liberal members in the back corner disagreeing with you and saying that people are still going to be better off with the carbon tax. Mr. Speaker, overall, on average Ontarians will pay $478 more per household because of the federal carbon tax. And in the year 2030, the average financial loss for Ontarians will be close to $2,000 per household. Increasing the carbon tax will only negatively impact Ontario families and our economy, not improve it despite what the Liberals might think. The carbon tax adversely affects our businesses and negatively impacts our economy and Ontario workers. Question. Can the Minister please set the record straight about how the carbon tax hurts all sectors of Ontario's economy? Thank you. Mr. Finance. Thank you again, Mr. Speaker, to the hardworking member from Carlton. Might think that more taxes and higher prices are good for the people of Ontario, but this government is taking action to put money back into the pockets of many Ontarians. While we wait for the federal government to end the carbon tax, our new measures are giving relief to families right across the province. That's why, Mr. Speaker, only a few weeks ago, we extended the gas tax cut to June 2014. That driver's continue to have a relief. Mr. Speaker, we ended the license plate stickers making it more affordable to drive your car, reducing electricity bills, cutting tools on the 412 and the 418. This government will continue to lead the way, making life more affordable for the people of Ontario and perhaps the members opposite would join us in doing just the same. Thank you. Next question, the member for Toronto Centre. Thank you, Speaker. In September, the Premier claimed that teachers and school boards were indoctrinating children about gender identity. Words matter, especially those spoken by the Premier. Today is the Trans Day of Remembrance and this House held a moment of silence to remember those who died or were killed because of transphobic hatred and violence. Since the Premier made that damaging claim, the Prime Minister has been raising dramatically. My question is, does the Premier regret his claim when he knows that the only curriculum being taught in Ontario is the one posted on the Ministry of Education's own website? I recognize the Minister of Citizenship and Multiculturalism. Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. I would like to thank the member for that important question. Mr. Speaker, there is no question that this is a vibrant 2SLGB TQIA plus community in that call Ontario home. We recognize the unique challenges and barriers faced by many within the community. Mr Speaker, that is why we are making critical investments to build safer and more secure communities in all aspects. This includes over $60 million in anti-hate initiatives just from my Ministry alone, including a $25.5 million investment on the anti-hate security and protection of the community. Mr. Speaker, as we observed the trans-denture day of remembrance, we remember the historical and ongoing challenges faced by the community and commit to building a stronger and more inclusive province where all Ontarians can safely and freely express their identity, practice their faith and observe their traditions. Mr. Speaker, empty words are the key to making trans communities safe. Hate crimes are on the rise in Ontario and in Toronto we have seen this tripled in the 2SLGBT community. In fact, according to Toronto Police Queer and Trans, people are the ones most frequently victimized by physical assault. In April I introduced an NDP bill to address this violence by creating the first ever Ontario-wide strategy to address 2SLGBT to stop transphobic violence. The community grows more afraid and is losing hope. Can the Premier, can anyone in government assure the trans and queer families like mine that they will keep us safe?  Thank you. Mr. Speaker, as I have said from day one, my door is always open and it will continue to stay open to all members of any community. During my time as Minister I have had ongoing discussions with many members of Ontario's 2SLGBTQIA plus community and organizations including Pride Toronto and the 519 who is just down the street. To learn more about the work they do and how best we can support them. These conversations have inspired the $4.8 million investment to 82 community lab projects that increase public education, awareness and understanding of the impacts of racism and hate just to name another initiative alone. Lastly Mr. Speaker I want to say in light of today being transgender day of remembrance not to anyone who has experienced discrimination, harassment or struggling please know that you are valued and that you are not alone. We are here for you and our government will continue building a stronger and more inclusive Ontario where all people feel safe and accepted. Thank you. Thank you very much. Start the clock. Next question the member for Scarborough Guildwood. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Transportation this government loves to talk about investing in transit and the transit agencies are more underfunded than ever what good is a new subway line if the other subway lines and bus routes are getting cut because the TTC is staffed for funding and government wouldn't pay up our economy relies on public transit getting our workers to work in time. Transit agencies are cutting routes while increasing fares reduced service is a major obstacle to bringing people back on the TTC where we are only at 78% of pre-pandemic usage the TTC does not have the money to restore service and we need the province to step up the provincial subsidy for transit agencies is not tied to inflation. Will the Minister commit to funding transit service that Ontarians rely on or will they continue treating bus riders as an after-talk? Mr. Speaker I mean that's a very very interesting question coming from a liberal member from Scarborough the member will of course remember that the previous liberal government absolutely did nothing when it came to supporting transit and transportation in Scarborough Speaker not only are we building a subway in Scarborough the Ontario line but we're also doing more on the GO services across not only into that area but across the GTI my own riding two way all day GO trains something we could have only dreamed of before it is now a many parts of the province we're putting historic levels of funding to support our transit and transportation including our public transportation system Speaker there is no government that has put more money into public transportation than this government and we will continue on that because we understand how important it is to building a bigger better stronger province of Ontario will continue to do the work that the liberals refuse to do when they have that opportunity the supplementary question Mr. Speaker under this governments watch an LRT derailed in Scarborough and we have seen no accountability from the conservatives no apology no commitment to fund the replacement busway that is urgently needed having witnessed one LRT line derailed because of poor maintenance I would hope that this government would see it as a warning that they need to invest in the system but instead the TTC has to cancel buying new trains for line 2 because of their provincially supported funding crisis the trains on line 2 are not built to last past 2026 and thousands of commuters and I are worried that a serious accident might occur once again we need to buy new trains and this government needs to step up because the TTC cannot afford it alone will the minister commit to helping Toronto replace the trains or he content to watch another subred derail under his governments watch government house as you know the Liberals voted against the 70 billion dollar increase in funding for transit they voted against that we provided historic levels of funding under the safe restart program but look the member is right on one thing it is time to make investments but you know when it was time to start making investments 10 12 years ago when the people of Scarborough when the people of Toronto were desperate for more subways and the Liberals did absolutely nothing Mr. Speaker now as in every single thing that this government has to do it is about catching up because after 15 years of disastrous liberal and NDP supported role we are faced with crisis whether it's in transit and transportation our health care system so we have to build hospitals renew our hospitals build long-term care build more roads improve our transit system we're building subways Mr. Speaker you know why we have to do all of that because under 15 years of Liberals they did absolutely nothing they spent but we have no idea what they spent on they have nothing to show for it other than high taxes high regulations and being one of the most indebted sub-sovereign governments in the world we're getting it done and we'll continue to get it done for all of the people of Toronto and Ontario. The member for Hastings, Lennox and Addington Thank you Speaker My question is for the Minister of Indigenous Affairs and Northern Development Speaker we've heard in this house and we've certainly heard from our constituents that the carbon tax is making everything more expensive for all Ontarians but the people of Northern Ontario and the Northern Indigenous communities are even more impacted by the high costs of goods and travel because of this regressive tax that's why it's so shocking to hear the Liberal and NDP opposition members continuing to defend the tax the reality is that the cost of transporting goods is already much higher in Northern Ontario and these costs are being passed on to the consumers Speaker will the Minister please elaborate on his views regarding the carbon tax negative impact on Northern Ontario and Northern Indigenous communities Good question The Minister of Northern Development and Minister of Indigenous Affairs Thank you Mr Speaker my good friend the member of there often discusses the price differences between groceries and other commodities between more populated communities in the north to look out to Sandy Lake First Nation was an example he gave and he noted that the price of chicken is sometimes six times higher in Sandy Lake First Nation than it is in Sioux Lookout and I would argue it's already more expensive in Sioux Lookout than it is in other big towns and cities well the Auditor General chimed in on this in 2022 said Indigenous groups are disproportionately burdened by the carbon tax this is before you factor in the harsh impacts of inflation disproportionately felt in remote communities and only being made worse by the carbon tax I know he was in Satchagolake this weekend I think it was I wondered if he noticed that gas was well above $2 a leader and bread was $4 a loaf Mr Speaker is he going to stand with us Mr Speaker and to vote to scrap this tax to implement your question Thank you very much Speaker and thank you to the minister for those examples of this outrageousness the carbon tax is in essence tax on everything your groceries, your gas, your home heating fuel so much more it's outrageous that the federal government is imposing this regressive tax that negatively impacts individuals and families especially those in northern communities instead of supporting northern Ontario by the NDP spend more time insulting the region calling it no man's land unlike other parts of our province the north faces unique barriers regarding fuel costs that need to be understood and respected individuals downplaying the carbon taxes impact on northern Ontario is ultimately disrespectful to all of its residents Mr Speaker will the minister please elaborate on the detrimental impacts of oil, the communities and the businesses across the north Minister of Northern Development All day long Mr Speaker take the member from Orleans who talks about how if everyone just got a heat pump and used electricity to power their homes why they'd be better off is the member from Orleans not aware that dozens of remote and isolated communities rely on diesel fuel and that heat pumps in places like canora don't actually work when temperatures move beyond minus 20 something that's going to be happening very quickly we're hard at work to make sure that our northern remote and isolated communities Mr Speaker have affordable clean energy but it turns out that old Saint Justin gave us a lump of coal Mr Speaker during this holiday season was only the folks from Atlantic Canada who got relief from that carbon tax Mr Speaker we moved off coal under the leadership of Michael Harris and other successive governments we are on coal Mr Speaker we need to scrap the carbon tax the next question the member from Niagara Falls thank you Mr Speaker my question is to the Premier last week we learned the Conservative Government is paying private for profit clinics two to four times more than they pay public hospitals for owe up covered surgeries also the former minister of health is now lobbying for clear-point health the biggest chain of private surgical clinics in the country this comes as a recent reports that noted that expanding private surgery will not reduce wait times in fact it will increase wait times for patients while worsening our staffing crisis in the province of Ontario Speaker why is the Premier choosing to put profits for private clinics to take care for patients in the province of Ontario respond the member for Eglinton Lawrence and Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Health thank you very much Mr Speaker thank you the member opposite for the question I haven't seen the study that you referred to I'll look at it but I don't understand how completing 14,000 extra cataract surgeries in the last year will not reduce wait times seems to me that reduced wait times it reduced wait times 14,000 people who have those cataract surgeries who can now read to their grandchildren who can now drive to the store who can now get about their daily lives and thank goodness we did that because people need to get back to their lives and that is what this government is doing making sure we have the right care in the right place at the right time paid for with your OHIP card well it's unfortunate that you hadn't seen the report it come out five days ago I give you plenty of time to read it back to the Premier this isn't the first time a conservative government in Ontario privatized public care the Mike Harris conservatives did it with long-term care they closed 26 hospitals and laid off 6,000 nurses 6,000 people have died in long-term care during the pandemic 78% were in private for profit clinics the military was called in for some of those homes some residents were dying of dehydration the Premier then gifted those homes with legal protection so families couldn't sue them for neglect and he gave some homes multi-decade long-licensed renewals absolutely shameful Speaker, why won't the Premier acknowledge that the mistakes of the previous conservative government repeal Bill 60 and invest in our publicly funded not-for-profit healthcare instead of the profits of private shareholders and CEOs, thank you very much Minister well thank you Speaker brought to unpack in that question from the member opposite so he wants to talk about long-term care well let's talk about the legacy of what the last government supported by the NDP had done to the system failing to build long-term care they knew we had an Asian population coming to this province with seniors that puts additional pressures on to a system a system that they created in 15 years building net new 611 beds a system in which they let the wait list grow to 40,000 people a system in which the average wait time for seniors was 152 days it is under the leadership of this Premier and this former long-term care minister said that we're not going to go down that road the road that they created where you don't support our seniors because we think we need to take care of our seniors that's why we're building 10 billion dollar record investment into building 58,000 new and redeveloped homes that's why we're taking care of our seniors with better diagnostic with better outcomes focusing on their health and well-being Speaker we won't take lessons from this NDP thank you the next question member for Essex thank you Mr. Speaker the next question is for the Minister of Transportation so far the Federal Liberal government has increased the carbon tax on gasoline five times and they plan on doing it seven more times over the next seven years the carbon tax is making life more expensive for everybody especially the trucking industry who we rely on to transport our goods that's why it was shocking to hear last week when the member from Canada Carlton actually stood up and defended the carbon tax that Liberal member may think that the carbon tax is a good thing but our government knows that it's a regressive tax and it only makes life more expensive for millions of people in Ontario Speaker can the minister please explain the impact of the Federal Liberal carbon tax on the trucking industry response? Member for Brampton East thank you Speaker I'm proud to represent the thousands of hardworking truckers in my riding every day they insure our grocery stores shelves are stocked and our hospitals have the equipment they need and our manufacturers have the resources they need to build Ontario made products but Speaker they tell me all the time the carbon tax adds unnecessary costs to each delivery according to the Ontario Trucking Association the carbon tax of 17.4 cents per liter increases fuel costs for a long haul truck between 15 to 20,000 dollars per truck per year Speaker it's clear that the carbon tax is hurting our economy and making life more expensive we call the federal government to do the right thing and get rid of the carbon tax the supplementary question Mr. Speaker I thank the parliamentary assistant for that answer the people of Ontario are certainly indebted to the hardworking men and women in the trucking industry who deliver the essential goods that we count on every day but Speaker the reality is that the impact of the carbon tax is having a bad impact on the trucking industry and it ultimately affects every consumer the cost to fuel the trucks to transport goods is passed on to the consumer who purchases those goods this is a critical issue and it impacts all Ontarians including those who live in canada Carlton where over 1500 people are employed in the trucking and warehousing industry unfortunately the member for that riding is ignoring their concerns about the negative impact of this carbon tax Speaker can the parliamentary assistant please elaborate on how the carbon tax impacts the trucking industry and all Ontarians Thank you Speaker and thank you to the member for that amazing question Speaker the NDP and the Liberals are so out of touch with reality right now they claim that the carbon tax is designed to help people transition to other options Speaker when it comes to long haul trucking there are no other options for the hardworking people who fill up their car, heat their homes and rely on truckers to deliver their goods I don't know when the last time the member from canada Carlton actually met with a trucker Speaker I invite her to come to Brampton and meet with the hardworking men and women who deliver our goods they will tell her that the carbon tax is making it harder for families to put food on the table and it's adding to inflation Thank you Speaker Minister the Premier yesterday was the world day of remembrance for traffic victims I was honoured to attend the Toronto Ceremony Speaker led by Jessica Speaker who joins us in the members gallery today from family and friends for safe streets who walked us through an Etobicoke neighbourhood documenting hundreds of collisions that have caused serious injury or death to pedestrians and cyclists by reckless drivers we can and we must act for change we can vote for Bill 40 the Moving Ontarians Safely Act this legislation has been debated in this house for 10 years by different caucuses it is not a partisan issue can the Premier confirm to the House today that the government will be supporting Bill 40 at Second Reading Thank you Thank you very much Mr Speaker I think that we were clear on that we would not be supporting it on Second Reading having said that there was a number of significant legislation that was brought in by the former Minister of Transportation with respect to road safety across the province of Ontario we will continue to build on that Thank you Speaker So I will say Speaker through you to the Premier and to the House that is a pretty disappointing answer after 10 years of advocacy in this place after members from every single political party in this House championing the exact words before this House and Bill 40 that is a very disappointing answer it is a disappointing answer to the 3,066 pedestrians who were struck by reckless drivers in 2022 this is the government's own numbers the 1412 cyclists who were struck by reckless drivers Speaker 466 of those pedestrians were either critically injured or died 135 of those cyclists were either critically injured or died There I ask the government through you Speaker an acceptable amount of road violence in our streets the government has taken action around stunt driving they talk about safety a lot but now is the moment to justify to this House with real words why are you deciding to vote against Bill 40 tell your government tell yourselves this is the moment to stand for safety and vote for Bill 40 please change your answer mind the members to make your comments to the Chair to apply and members for going to the east thank you Speaker and thank you for the member for that great question Speaker our government has done tremendous work to make sure that our roads stay safe that's why we have some of the safest roads in North America when we take a look at legislation introduced by our government we take a look at the Moms Act and all the wonderful things that came with that particular act that was taking real action Mr Speaker on ensuring that our roads continue to stay safe like I said to the member opposite in debate earlier that our door is always open to take good ideas but the proposed idea that's been given to the ministry labelling vulnerable road users that is left up to the courts so they can make the right decision based on each individual case each accident is different and the courts should have the power to make that determination not a blanket legislation that's going to take over and then label all of them into one particular category we'll be introducing more legislation in the coming months but our government is committed to ensuring that the best roads in North America and we're open to taking all ideas because of non-party issues Thank you Mr Speaker Thank you Mr Speaker my question is for the Associate Minister of Small Business Small Businesses contribute significantly to Ontario's economy However, the carbon tax is making it more difficult for many small businesses to survive that's why it was so shocking to hear last Thursday member from Canada Carleton rose in this house to defend the federal carbon tax. The member claimed that the vast majority of households in Ontario are better off with a price on carbon. Speaker, the reality is that no one is better off because of the carbon tax. With over 6,000 retail trade employees working in Canada Carleton alone, many of these businesses and their workers feel this regressive carbon tax is negatively impacting them. Speaker, can the Associate Minister please explain how the carbon tax impacts small businesses across Ontario? Thank you to the great member from Thornhill for the question and for advocating so passionately, but job created in her writing. Speaker, I had the privilege of hearing directly from entrepreneurs across the province and maybe the member from Canada Carleton should do the same in her writing. Time and time again, they expressed real concern about the burden of rising costs from the federal carbon tax, combined with the upcoming deadlines like seaball loan repayments. The carbon tax inflates expenses at every step of the supply chain. Whether they're farmers producing food, manufacturers leveraging our skilled workforce, or shops anchoring our main streets, Ontario's job creators all agree this punitive tax hits hardest just as they're getting back on their feet. Many business owners have shared fears that it could help make them reduce staff, raise prices or even shut their doors for good. Unlike the Liberals and NDP, our government is listening to entrepreneurs and we're taking action on affordability. We'd like them to join us in calling on Ottawa to scrap the carbon tax. Thank you Speaker and thank you to the Associate Minister for standing up for small businesses owners across our province. So our government must continue to respect the importance of small businesses. We know that the carbon tax is harmful to their success. Speaker, cutting the carbon tax has been one of our top priorities since day one in order for our small businesses to grow and thrive. And as our government works to make life more affordable for Ontarians, it's concerning that the member from Kanata Carleton is not supporting the small businesses in her riding. Speaker, can the Associate Minister please elaborate on how our government continues to support small businesses in Ontario by fighting the federal carbon tax? The Associate Minister. Thank you Speaker and again to the member for the question. Speaker, I am proud to be part of a government under Premier Ford's strong leadership who has from the start spoken out against this job-killing tax. Yes, Speaker. And I'm glad to see Premier's right across all political strikes join us in calling on the federal government to expand exemptions for the carbon tax to lessen the burden on consumers and job creators. You're here. Every day I meet inspirational entrepreneurs who are pouring their hearts and souls into building something from nothing, providing jobs and hope. That's why we've been there with our million-dollar investment in Futurepreneur Canada, which helps young entrepreneurs access financing, mentorship and resources to turn their bold ideas into thriving businesses. Our digital mainstream which helps existing businesses create and enhance their online presence and generate jobs. Speaker, we've stepped up to the plate for small businesses. It's time. Thank you. Thank you. The next question, the member for the Speaker, James Bay. Let's see, Mr. President, to the Premier. This is a critical time of the year when Ontario's conservation officers are hard at work to deter unsafe hunting practices and protect wildlife. Conservation officers also investigate gruesome injuries and death that result from tragic hunting-related accidents and are responsible for laying charges in case of careless hunting. They are working in some of Ontario's most isolated locations with limited access to support and assistance from other enforcement agencies. But conservation officers are not classified properly or compensated fairly for the work they do, causing no morale and a retention crisis. My question. One of this government acknowledged the duties that conservation officers undertake and commit to reclassify them accordingly. Speaker, at this time of year, especially during hunting season, conservation officers play an incredibly important role in the protection and management of Ontario's natural resources to ensure that residents and visitors to Ontario can safely enjoy the province's natural resources for generations to come. Conservation officers connect with over 200,000 natural resource users from over 50 locations across the province annually, and we heard from our partners that we need more boots on the ground. In response, we've fulfilled our promise to create 25 new conservation officer positions, and that brings a total number of conservation officer positions to over 200 here in the province of Ontario. During that posting, the ministry received and reviewed nearly 4,000 applications for these highly sought-after positions. Conservation officers are the front line, safeguarding our natural heritage. This important work has been ongoing in Ontario for 130 years and will continue. We will continue to support and they will continue to protect our important natural resources. Thank you to the member for Thunder Bay Superior North. Thank you, Speaker. I'm hearing a lot of lip service from the government side. In the meantime, morale continues to decline because experienced conservation officers are leaving the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry to take jobs where their pay actually matches their training and experiences. Conservation officers are paid up to $31,000 less than OPP officers, despite being held to the same standards of training. They have same levels of risk and the responsibility to carry side arms. With the stroke of the pen, the government could provide the reclassification of these workers that these workers have long deserved. Will this government recognize that the training and duties of conservation officers far exceeds their compensation and commit to reclassification? Member for Hastings, Lennox and Adams. Thank you, Speaker. We are, of course, aware that OPSU and the employer are working on a classification review. And I'm actually quite confused by the idea that the NDP would support government interference in that process. But I also understand that the director of our enforcement branch is part of the committee designed to review this classification. They will make sure that the work, the skills, the importance of the conservation officers are specifically addressed during this review. This government responded by creating new officers, new positions to support these officers, and we will continue to value the work of our conservation officers and the continued effort to support them in any way we can. Next question, the Member for Bradford Grant. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Mines. Mining is an essential part of the supply chain that we are building for electric vehicles and is a source of significant economic opportunity. For many Northern communities, mining provides stable and good-paying jobs and brings prosperity to regional economies. Unfortunately, Speaker, the opposition has voted against every action our government has taken to support the mining sector. Speaker, what's even worse is that the independent Liberals and the opposition NDP support the federally-imposed carbon tax, which harms this critical sector. While our government is taking urgent action, other members in this House are supporting a regressive tax which will hold back progress in expanding the mining sector. Speaker, can the Minister please explain the impact of the carbon tax on Ontario's mining sector? Thank you. Minister of Mines. Thank you to the Member for Bradford Grant for this very important question. Speaker, a U of T study shows that creating one new mines creates over $300 million increase with Ontario's GDP and creates approximately 2,000 jobs. That's why we want more mines, Speaker. But the carbon tax has threatened these opportunities to grow our economy and the NDP and the Liberals support this disastrous tax. They support hiking up fuel costs for the exploration companies in my writing that are working out in the bush, searching for new mines. They support hurting small businesses and timmons by making it more expensive to get the drillings turning and ship the core samples in the labs around Ontario. They support making it more expensive for large mining companies to reinvest their opportunities and extend mine opportunities in their own writings. Speaker, we need the opposition to join us in telling their friends in Ottawa to axe this tax. Supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker, and thank you, Minister, for that response. This regressive carbon tax impacts Ontario's mining competitiveness. According to the Mining Association of Canada, the minimum federal carbon tax is set to increase by $15 per ton per year until it reaches $170 per ton in 2030. At a time when our government has attracted investments that position Ontario to become the global leader in manufacturing every component of clean zero-emission electric vehicles, the impact of the carbon tax will cause significant consequences. It is unacceptable that the independent Liberals and the opposition NDP continue to support the federal carbon tax. Speaker, can the Minister please explain the impact of the carbon tax on major job creators for our economy, like the mining sector? Thank you. Minister of Mines. Thank you to the member from Brantford-Brand, again for the very important question. I've said it many times, Mr. Speaker. There's no electric vehicle revolution without mining. I was encouraged this past year when the feds followed our lead by creating their own critical mineral strategy to support the homegrown electric vehicle supply chain. But, Speaker, they can't have it both ways. You can't put a tax that will raise the cost of our minerals at a time when we are competing globally. Yet they are imposing a tax that ensures that every part and process required to make electric vehicles is more expensive, especially our critical minerals. You heard it, right, Speaker? The member opposite support the federal carbon tax that burdens the people and industries required to build EVs. Shamefully, it's shameful that they support a tax that makes life more affordable for families and makes job creating industries less competitive. It's time to axe this tax. Thank you very much. That concludes our question period for this morning.


Hi everyone. So in this video I want to talk about band breaks. So band breaks are, well, effectively what they sound like. You have your rotating thing, which is a pulley or a drum or something like that. And you have a band wrapped around it. When you apply tension to that band, it increases the friction between the rotating drum and the stationary band and brings it to a stop or at least slows it down, hopefully. So we want to look at how we might analyze band breaks and kind of what is going into that situation. So when we talk about band breaks, there's a couple of different versions that we might think about. Each involve a rotating member. The first one that I'm going to show is just a basic band break. And the format is that we have a fixed pivot with a handle attached to it. And then we have the band, which wraps, obviously in contact. I'm just kind of drawing this around as rough as I, or as good as I'm able, actually. So a band that wraps around it. And when we apply a force to the handle, it increases the tension in the band and applies that friction to the rotating drum, causing it to stop. We can also have another form, which is a slight variation. And so I have my same pivot point here. But now my handle, which is out here, also extends down this way and has something like that. So now I've got my band wrapped around my drum and attached to my handle. I apply a force, right? And this may may look like kind of a weird situation, right? Because if I'm applying a force down here and pushing the handle down, I'm increasing the tension here, but presumably decreasing the tension on this side, right? Because I'm allowing more slack into the band as I go. And therefore, you know, it requires a little bit of careful consideration of the two lengths here, one between the pivot point and the contact on the right hand side, and the distance between the pivot point and the contact on the left hand side. So I've got the first labeled A and the second labeled B. So as long as A is greater than B, then I'm net increasing the tension in the band, right? As a net result. But what this does for me, this configuration, is it makes this break what we would call self-energizing. And really what it means is that, so as the tension and therefore the friction increases between the rotating drum and the band, the drum is trying to pull the band clockwise in this case around it. And as it pulls, it's increasing the tension on the handle itself down here on the left hand side. So it's actually lending assistance to the breaking process through that friction. So it's self-energizing in that it's using some of the friction from that interface to actually apply more breaking force. So in that case, it's kind of providing, I guess, assistance. Alright, so let's take a look at what it would look like then to analyze this. And I'm going to use the simpler version of the band break for this analysis example. So kind of zooming in, I guess, on the drum, I have my drum and it rotates, right? And I have my band wrapped around it. And on either side, I have tensions. I'm going to call them P1 and P2. So these tension forces are just the tension in the band. Now, you know, you might say, well, shouldn't the tension be the same in the band, right? Because it's all just one thing. And that's generally true when we talk about things like pulleys, and we're assuming negligible friction in like the pulley bearing and things like that. But in this case, we're not talking about a pulley. We're talking about something that has friction as this band passes over the drum. And therefore, these two tensions are not likely to be the same. Because of the rotation, tension one is likely to be greater than tension two. So as this drum rotates, it's going to be pulling and increasing the tension in the band at P1 while decreasing the tension P2. And therefore, we would expect that P1 to be larger. So let's take a look at this by isolating a small segment of the band and pulling it out for a free body diagram. So we're going to zoom in on a small segment, a differential segment again, of the band in order to better analyze it. So we're going to say that this is a small differential piece where its length is an arc length, which you free remember from other courses, other places, arc length is r theta. But in this case, we're going to say it's r d theta because again, we're using a differentially sized piece of material. So very, very small for our analysis. Now on either side of this small chunk of the band, we have tension. So we'll say we have on this side tension P. And it's on the right hand side, which means it should be smaller than the tension on the left hand side. So we'll say that at this side, it's tension P plus whatever change in tension delta or DP occurs across that differential piece. Now the orientation of this tension vector is that d theta, which is our segment, how much of a chunk we've separated out is d theta, but only half of that, right? Because we're changing angle on both sides. So we have another d theta over two over here on the right hand side. Okay. So this theta again comes from whichever, however big the differential chunk of material is. So if I wanted the full d theta, I would label it right here like that. And finally we have some normal force dn acting on it like this. And then we have a friction force mu dn acting on it as well. So that's the friction force due to the drum rotating against this small chunk of material. All right. So scroll down a little so we can see some more space. So now we need to take what effectively is a free body diagram and construct some equations. So in the vertical direction, we're going to do an equilibrium. And basically what we have is a force on the left hand side of pdp, p plus dp on the right hand side of p, but only the vertical or y direction if you want to call it components. So on the left we have p plus dp times sine of the angle. Remember the angle is d theta over two p on the right hand side again times sine of d theta over two. And then we have the normal force. Now it might be a little confusing in that I've left these two as positive, which means I've indicated that down is positive. It doesn't really matter. I just need to make sure that I end up with the opposite for my vertical positive or upwards direction component, which is dn. And then this is all in equilibrium. So it's equal to zero.  So I'm going to make some simplifying assumptions or corrections to it. This is going to look a little bit like mathematical hand waving. And that's because it kind of is. But we're going to take something called the small angle assumption. And if you're not familiar with the small angle assumption, it's basically that for small angles, which d theta would be a small angle because it's differential, which means it's very very small, we can say that sine of the angle, which in this case is d theta over two, is approximately equal to the angle itself, d theta over two. So that basically just says we're dropping the sine from this because it's it's not affecting things very much for very small angles. We're also going to say that dp is much much smaller than p, which means that over here in this p plus dp, I can basically cross out the dp part because it's so much smaller than p being a differential piece that it doesn't have much influence. So if I do that, I've gotten rid of these signs. So cross that out, cross that out, cross out this dp. What am I actually left with? Well, I've got a p times d theta over two plus a p times d theta over two. So that would be two p times d theta over two. So those twos cancel out.  So I've simplified this kind of long, ugly equation down into something, you know, something we can handle. Now we can do the same thing in the horizontal, or if you want to think of it as the x direction, we can write an equilibrium here. So same general idea. But now instead of the sine component, we're using the cosine component of the tension forces. They're in opposite directions. And I have the friction component of my normal force in there as well. Alright, so I'm going to do some similar mathematical hand waving and use the small angle assumption where cosine d theta over two is approximately equal to one for small angles. So if I factor this in, then I've got this cosine d theta over two is approximately equal to one, approximately equal to one. And now I can rewrite my equation. I can say I have p plus dp times one minus p. So that's p plus dp minus p. So I'm left with dp minus mu dn equals zero, which then gives me that dp equals mu dn. So I'm going to take this dn substituted in down here into this equation. And that gives me dp equals mu p d theta. So I've got what's starting to look like a differential equation here. I can collect my terms. So doing that, I'm going to divide p over. So I have one over p dp is equal to mu d theta. And I can integrate both sides of this. So I'm going to integrate this from p2 to p1 because I'm integrating over p. And I'm going to integrate this side from zero to phi, where phi, which I may not have noted before, phi is going to be basically the angle over which the band makes contact with the drum. So it's this angle here, angle phi is going to be that angle. So it's basically the range over which my band makes contact with my drum. All right. So I've got this integration set up. The integral of one over p is going to be the ln or the natural log of p evaluated from p2 to p1. So when you subtract these, you can actually bring them inside the natural log like this. And I'm evaluating mu times the integration of d theta, which would be just theta evaluated from zero to phi, which means it's just phi. Rearranging this equation to solve for p1 over p2, I take e to the power of each side, which means I get something that looks like this as an expression. So that's useful as a relationship between p1 and p2. Now, I also can look at my free body diagram of my drum where I have p2, p1, and some torque that's being applied by that friction, which means that I can solve for t as p1 minus p2 times radius. So now between these two equations, I in theory also have enough information to actually solve this problem and figure out what my torque is for a given known tension or a given known torque, solve for tension and so forth.


Let's feed Pivot and I pivot to turn the thing my low ball flips up to be a time and Then at the same time I do a little palm here Okay, so when my left hand Just a left hand It's a low ball. I step over here and then flip the time up here We're just the right hand. It becomes a ton


Paul's letter to the Colossians, from the New Testament in modern speech, translated by Richard Francis Weymouth. CHAPTER I Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, to the people of God and the believing brethren at Colossae who are in Christ, may grace and peace be granted to you from God our Father. We give thanks to God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, constantly praying for you as we do, because we have heard of your faith in Christ Jesus, and of the love which you cherish towards all God's people, on account of the hope treasured up for you in heaven. Of this hope you have already heard in the message of the truth of the good news, for it has reached you, and remains with you, just as it has also spread through the whole world, yielding fruit there and increasing, as it has done among you from the day when first you heard it, and came really to know the grace of God, as you learned it from Epaphras, our dearly loved fellow-servant. He is to you a faithful minister of Christ in our stead, and moreover he has informed us of your love which is inspired by the Spirit. For this reason we also, from the day we first received these tidings, have never ceased to pray for you, and to entreat that you may be filled with a clear knowledge of his will, accompanied by thorough wisdom and discernment in spiritual things, so that your lives may be worthy of the Lord, and perfectly pleasing to him, while you exhibit the results of right action of every sort, and grow into a fuller knowledge of God. Since his power is so glorious, may you be strengthened with strength of every kind, and be prepared for cheerfully enduring all things with patience and long suffering, and give thanks to the Father who has made us fit to receive our share of the inheritance of God's people in light. It is God who has delivered us out of the dominion of darkness, and has transferred us into the kingdom of his dearly loved Son, in whom we have our redemption, the forgiveness of our sins. Christ is the visible representation of the invisible God, the firstborn and Lord of all creation, for in him was created the universe of things in heaven and on earth, things seen and things unseen, thrones, dominions, princetums, powers, all were created and exist through and for him, and he is before all things, and in and through him the universe is a harmonious whole. Moreover, he is the head of his body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from among the dead, in order that he himself may in all things occupy the foremost place. For it was the Father's gracious will that the whole of the divine perfections should dwell in him, and God purposed through him to reconcile the universe to himself, making peace through his blood which was shed upon the cross. To reconcile to himself through him, I say, things on earth and things in heaven.  If indeed you are still firmly holding to faith as your foundation, without ever shifting from your hope that rests on the good news that you have heard, which has been proclaimed in the whole creation under heaven, and in which I, Paul, have been appointed to serve. Now I can find joy amid my sufferings for you, and I fill up in my own person whatever is lacking in Christ's afflictions on behalf of his body, the church. I have been appointed to serve the church in the position of responsibility entrusted to me by God for your benefit, so that I may fully deliver God's message, the truth which has been kept secret from all ages and generations, but has now been revealed to his people, to whom it was his will to make known how vast a wealth of glory for the Gentile world is implied in this truth, the truth that Christ is in you, the hope of glory. Him we preach, admonishing everyone and instructing everyone with all possible wisdom so that we may bring everyone into God's presence, made perfect through Christ. To this end, like an earnest wrestler, I exert all my strength and reliance upon the power of him who is mightily at work within me. For I would have you know, in how severe a struggle I am engaged on behalf of you and the brethren in Laodicea, and of all who have not known me personally, in order that their hearts may be cheered, they themselves being welded together in love, and enjoying all the advantages of a reasonable certainty, till at last they attain the full knowledge of God's truth which is Christ himself. In him all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are stored up, hidden from view. I say this to prevent your being misled by anyone's plausible sophistry, for although as you say I am absent from you in body, yet in spirit I am present with you, and am delighted to witness your good discipline and the solid front presented by your faith in Christ. As therefore you have received the Christ, even Jesus our Lord, live and act in vital union with him, having the roots of your being firmly planted in him, and continually building yourselves up in him, and always being increasingly confirmed in the faith as you were taught it, and abounding in it with thanksgiving. Take care lest there be someone who leads you away as prisoners by means of his philosophy and idle fancies, following human traditions and the world's crude notions instead of following Christ, for it is in Christ that the fullness of God's nature dwells embodied, and in him you are made complete, and he is the Lord of all princes and rulers.  The bond with its requirements which was in force against us and was hostile to us, he cancelled, and cleared it out of the way, killing it to his cross, and the hostile princes and rulers he shook off from himself and boldly displayed them as his conquests when by the cross he triumphed over them. Therefore suffer no one to sit in judgment on you as to eating or drinking or with regard to a festival, a new moon or a sabbath. These were a shadow of things that were soon to come, but the substance belongs to Christ. Let no one defraud you of your prize, priding himself on his humility and on his worship of the angels, and taking his stand on the visions he has seen, and idly puffed up with his unspiritual thoughts. Such a one does not keep his hold upon Christ, the head, from whom the body, in all its parts nourished and strengthened by its points of contact and its connections, grows with a divine growth. If you have died with Christ and have escaped from the world's rudimentary notions, why as though your life still belonged to the world do you submit to such precepts as, do not handle this, do not taste that, do not touch that other thing, referring to things which are all intended to be used up and perished in obedience to mere human injunctions and teachings, these rules have indeed an appearance of wisdom where self-imposed worship exists, and an affectation of humility and an ascetic severity, but not one of them is of any value in combating the indulgence of our lower natures. CHAPTER III If however you have risen with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, and thrown at God's right hand. Give your minds to the things that are above, not to the things that are on the earth, for you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ appears, He is our true life, then you also will appear with Him in glory, therefore put to death your earthward inclinations, fornication, impurity, sensual passion, unholy desire, and all greed, for that is a form of idolatry. It is on account of these very sins that God's anger is coming, and you also were once addicted to them while you were living under their power. But now you must rid yourselves of every kind of sin, angry and passionate outbreaks, ill-will, evil-speaking, foul-mouthed abuse, so that these may never soil your lips. Do not speak falsehoods to one another, for you have stripped off the old self with its doings, and have clothed yourselves with the new self which is being remolded into full knowledge so as to become like Him who created it. In that new creation there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, barbarian, sithian, slave nor free man, but Christ is everything and is in all of us. Clothe yourselves, therefore, as God's own people, holy and dearly loved, with tender heartedness, kindness, loneliness of mind, meekness, long-suffering, bearing with one another and readily forgiving each other if any one has a grievance against another. Just as the Lord has forgiven you, you also must forgive. And over all these put on love, which is the perfect bond of union, and let the peace which Christ gives settle all questionings in your heart to which peace indeed you were called as belonging to His one body, and be thankful. Let the teaching concerning Christ remain as a rich treasure in your hearts. In all wisdom teach and admonish one another with psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, and sing with grace in your hearts to God. And whatever you do, in word or indeed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus and let it be through Him that you give thanks to God the Father. Married women, be submissive to your husbands as is fitting in the Lord. Married men, be affectionate to your wives and do not treat them harshly. Children, be obedient to your parents in everything, for that is right for Christians. Fathers, do not fret and harass your children, or you may make them sullen and morose. Slaves, be obedient in everything to your earthly masters, not in acts of eye service as aiming only to please men, but with simplicity of purpose, because you fear the Lord. Whatever you are doing, let your hearts be in your work as a thing done for the Lord and not for men, for you know that it is from the Lord you will receive the inheritance as your reward.  The man who perpetrates a wrong will find the wrong repaid to him, and with God there are no merely earthly distinctions. Masters, deal justly and equitably with your slaves, knowing that you too have a Master in heaven. Be earnest and unwaried in prayer, being on the alert in it and in your giving of thanks, and pray at the same time for us also that God may open for us a door for preaching, for us to tell the truth concerning Christ, for the sake of which I am even a prisoner. Then I shall proclaim it fully, as it is my duty to do. Behave wisely in relation to the outside world, buying up your opportunities. Let your language be always seasoned with the salt of grace, so that you may know how to give every man a fitting answer. Tychicus, our much-loved brother, a trusty assistant and fellow servant with us in the Lord's work, will give you every information about me, and for this very purpose I send him to you that you may know how we are faring and that he may cheer your hearts, and with him I send our dear and trusty brother Onesimus, who is one of yourselves. They will inform you of everything here. Aristarchus, my fellow prisoner, sends greetings to you, and so does Barnabas' cousin, Mark. You have received instructions as to him. If he comes to you, give him a welcome. Jesus, called Justus, also sends greeting. These three are Hebrew converts. They alone among such have worked loyally with me for the kingdom of God. They are men who have been a comfort to me. Epaphras, who is one of yourselves, a bond servant of Jesus Christ, sends greetings to you, always wrestling on your behalf in his prayers that you may stand firm, Christians of right character, and of clear conviction as to everything which is God's will. For I can bear witness to the deep interest he takes in you and in the brethren at Laodicea and in those at Hieropolis. Luke, the dearly loved physician, salutes you, and so does Demas. Christian greetings to the brethren at Laodicea, especially to Nymphas and to the church that meets at their house. And when this letter has been read among you, let it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans, and you in turn must read the one I am sending to Laodicea, and tell Archbishop to discharge carefully the duties devolving upon him as a servant of the Lord. I, Paul, add with my own hand this final greeting, Be mindful of me in my imprisonment. Grace be with you. The end of Paul's letter to the Colossians from the New Testament in modern speech, translated by Richard Francis Weymouth. Recording by Mark Penfold. Completed March 23, 2020, Lincoln, Nebraska.