We are going to study today the topic of explicit cost under the financial constraint. As the word explicit make it clear that it pertains to that cost that is quite obvious, quite clear or we can say the tangible. So those costs that we are going to enter in our cost accounting in our ledgers and for which we are going to pay the inputs they will be called the explicit cost. And particularly this is just opposite to the implicit cost. Now explicit cost, if we look at all those aspects, hiring of labour, hiring of the inputs or we can say for the energy for the chemicals for pesticides for any type of the material these all will be included and that will be reported. For any type of the management skills for which we are going to pay any security personals or unlike anything so these will be the quite clear, tangible for which we can say that these are explicit costs and totally implicit plus explicit they both make up the economic cost of a system. So generally if we look at it, then this too is the same as we talked about that the implicit costs we see in the form of an opportunity cost and we can assess it. So here even if we look at the explicit cost, then in one or other form this also possesses the opportunity cost. Now what is the opportunity cost? Means if you are investing an amount of money on an input then that amount of money, it has also an alternative value and it has also an alternative resource means only that money could be used or utilized to purchase any other resource. So even in the assessment of those explicit resources we have to see that the foregone value of that value attached to it becomes an opportunity cost. Now coming to the next point we can say that these are the costs that we calculate but mostly they are included in the form of the profit. Now if we talk about profit, it means profit is always equal to revenue minus costs. So when we have to minus the cost of revenue, then all these costs that are involved in the production procedure and for which we are giving the payments, then we are including that cost. Either it was fixed cost or it was in the form of a variable form. But now there are some costs that if we say that they are not tangible and might be slightly tangible but we can say that they are not that obvious but for which we have to give the cost. Now what is it? When we say the depreciation of an asset. Now what is the depreciation? That over the time any input like machinery is not performing in the perfect form and its depreciation which we generally say there is a wear and tear of that machinery. If there is a building then you have to pay a maintenance cost. Likewise, these are the costs that we say that depreciation and it is not that tangible a trace or it cannot be assessed. But they do possess certain cost in the budget or the ledgers. So whenever the budgeting is set up, then whenever there is an allocation of the budget for the purchase of the new things but in the same way the already assets that are present whether it is cars, machinery, buildings then a certain amount of the budget is always allocated for the over come or the over hauling of this depreciation or to save the future loss we have to control this depreciation. So this cost of underlying company assets comes in the last minute or two. Now if we look at explicit costs then the best form we have is that whatever we have the costs that are present in the system they will be accounted for so then we can allocate the proper budget for those and why would we do the budget when we will include all types of the costs then proper assessment of profit will be possible. So implicit or the explicit these two kinds of costs are very important to have proper valuation. Thank you.


So I know you're looking at the title of the video like what were you wrong about now because you be wrong about so many things when it comes to our Baltimore Ravens well I'm about to tell y'all we're gonna get into this rapid fire version a question from subscribers first question came from my guy Oreo cookie he said number one seed hello engraving hope you're having a good day whenever you're reading this some people question whether or not we should want the number one seed due to what happened in 2019 and as you know we are currently in possession of the number one seed but not so possession we do not have so possession because of the conference record because if the ravens and chiefs both went out the chiefs they would get the number one seed okay so there you go I was completely wrong about that and some people had actually um they corrected me politely with respect of course in the comment section which I appreciate it because you y'all know hey if I'm wrong about something and like I always tell y'all I am going to be wrong a lot a lot um but yeah just kindly correct me let me know say hey engraving it's actually this not that uh and in this case I thought if the ravens went out hey they'll be good to go now hey ravens still went out they should still went out they need to still run out you can still take care of your business and then just whoever going against the chiefs go whoever that team is keep beating those chiefs chiefs keep on losing me let ravens get that number one seed because again I know um Lamar even talked about it he even talked about it in the interview with Devin McCordy he even said man when we getting all that high he said I don't like that I don't like when everybody talking about us like that I like when we're the underdog and I disagree with that heavily because if how can you be because I know a lot of ravens fans they do the same thing they like oh yeah we want to be the underdog how can you be you want to be a top team like all ravens fans they want the ravens to be a top team but at the same time they still want them to be an underdog it's like no you you can't have both do you want them to be a team that's scratching and clawing their way into the playoffs or do you want to be sitting nice do you want to be one of the best teams consistently in the NFL I know which one I would choose but anyway um yeah my apologies for that misinformation about the ravens winning out um because again I thought that if they won out they will be good to go and I mean either way if they went out they will be in great position for whatever um but they will they do have a lot of other people around them now the dolphins right now sitting at 8 and 3 2 but if the ravens went out that means the dolphins wouldn't win out because the ravens played the dolphins on December 31st so you see how that works out um so we'll see how everything ends up shaking out but anyway back to my guy's question he said uh do you want the number one seed okay I should have read this because yes I do I do he said anyway um I personally do you always take the buy in my opinion plus Lamar has experience not to have that happen again go ravens yes I would love if the Baltimore ravens got that number one seed because that would mean home field advantage and again home field advantage it makes a difference yeah ravens got stomped a couple years back 2019 they got punched in the mouth okay get over it get over it like it's like ravens fans like trying to keep themselves in misery sometimes let it go it was 29th yeah it happened okay and what so you're gonna be like well I never want the number one seed again I wouldn't always barely get into the playoffs no no get that number one seed get a top as top of a top seed that you can possibly get let 2019 go yeah it hurt ravens got punched in the mouth a couple times but hey how can you get better at something if you just like you know what I ain't even gonna try no more I ain't even gonna go for it no more um you know what I'm just I'm done with I'm gonna give up no man so again the whole underdog thing yeah it's cool it's straight but but embrace it embrace being good embrace hopefully this year being great next question came from my god be more draysay what's going on man I've been watching your channel for years now and it's great to see how far you and the channel have come from the Carviz to a tour of M.T bank stadium and thousands of subscribers it's amazing wishing you more success so I appreciate you Drake thank you man we ain't come no way though we ain't come no way we ain't go no way man we're still still sitting the same way we've been sitting for the longest in this little chair right here talking to this camera talking to everybody and just letting them know everything that we be wrong about when it comes to the Baltimore Raven but anyway he said my question is do you think the Ravens game plan to pick on a specific corner I've seen other QBs pick on the third corner a lot it doesn't seem like we do it we have Zay OBJ Bate and Nelly but our receivers never go off uh that's a good question I don't think they really do that I don't think they really try to attack a certain corner and he's no I don't never thought about that before that's a really good question no I don't he said um also what's wrong with our screen passes seems like when teams throw them against us they get chunked plays but teams are over us when we run them I think with the screen passes I think what it is is that with the Baltimore Ravens they um a lot of times with the screenplays they are so expected they can be expected they can be so obvious like oh Ravens here go a screenplay and they'll run one and it'll be successful then they run another one then another one and another and they'll get just screen pass happy and they'll go crazy with them so I think teams that they be all over that uh after like the first one is successful but after like the second or third one teams be all over it and Ravens they don't do enough when it comes to disguising it like you could set something up nice with them screenplay like you could run one have success with it even run another one and it could be solid uh but then on that third one you could fake it you could fake it and then throw a little inside slant or throw a deep whatever but I think Ravens need to do a better job of sort of disguising those screen passes and then I think they'll have much more success next question came from my guy Stone do why he said someone isn't getting talked about enough and Raven has been a minute since I sent in a question but with the recent loss of Mark Andrews has made me think about who will replace him now I don't think they will be able to truly replace him the chemistry uh that him and Lamar had is unmatched but I'm glad EDC finally started listening to the people sitting at the end of the bar and actually got Lamar some weapons yeah hey what kind of drink you what what were you sipping on anyway now for the main point of this message early on in the season preseason we got to see a lot of our depth get put on display since the Ravens chose not to play a lot of their starters and to be honest we got to see someone who was making an acrobatic catch almost every game who could that be huh I'm trying not to look at the answer but who is it not Charlie cold no not Isaiah likely not this year um duvin a not really no um all right let's keep moving he's tylin Wallace he said tylin Wallace and yes I understand he's all the way at the bottom of the depth chart but where are all Mark's red zone talk is gonna go I don't think it's getting talked about enough how much more difficult the red zone will be without Mark Andrews that's a really good point um because Mark Andrew you mentioned the chemistry between him and and Lamar Jackson but also along with that chemistry what is Mark Andrews like 6465 tall guy tall tall weapon for Lamar Jackson in the red zone somebody who can go up and get it got the long arms got the length um so yeah man they uh they don't have that with well they got it with Charlie Kohler and Isaiah likely they got some big frames there so we'll see how they incorporate them in the red zone but as far as receivers no they just got uh not smaller stature guys for all of them but nobody long like that but Lamar has already shown throughout his career he can get it done if it's a even with smaller receivers so that's not an issue even in the red zone because we've seen so many times with him in Hollywood like man you think that Hollywood like five nine five eight five nine like red zone target red zone threat yes he was he was him and Lamar Jackson they had some special but anyway he said um Tyler Wallace uh had two spectacular back shoulder catches in the preseason it wouldn't surprise me at all if we saw him in more red zone situations especially without Mark thanks for all the amazing content you put out and hope the family is doing great much love and go Ravens I appreciate that man uh that would be an interesting one right there but like you said he is all the way at the bottom of the depth chart would they allow him to have some playing time on offense I don't see it uh because again Zay flowers Odell Rashal Bateman then you still got Net Nelson Aguilore too so you already got four receivers in front of him then you got the two tight ends I'd say like me and Charlie Colo then you got Gus Edwards you got Keaton Mitchell you got Justice so you got all those guys in front of him he will be after all of those so I think it'll be very hard for him to really get that shot speaking of wide receivers next question came from my guy G-star he said Adam Thielen I'm not liking this question already I just read the tie I ain't liking the question already bless the T said ain't great no ball as well I appreciate all you do for us Ravens Flock fans I don't do nothing but talk y'all really do everything you see these these questions that we going over who's that from that's from y'all I ain't doing nothing but talk I don't do nothing special man I appreciate y'all y'all do everything special uh he said uh as well hope everything is good for you and the family appreciate it man now my question to you is clearly Adam Thielen is not happy with how the Panthers are doing this year Bryce Young even though he's a rookie and has plenty of time to grow isn't feeding Adam the ball enough and their OC is not allowing him to be effective I know he signed a three-year $25 million deal but the Panthers that will have him a that'll give him a nine-mil cap hit but next year in a base salary of 5.5 million 2024 and four mil for 2025 would you think the Ravens might take a look if Panthers want to possibly trade him no I don't I don't um and I mean no like no solid possession receive him around running good hands um now when he's gotten his target he has produced uh good job on third down stuff like that but uh as far as trading for giving up something for Adam Thielen no not at this point in his career I I could see them depending on how everything else shakes out maybe taking a little but maybe I would rather them look in other directions first before an Adam Thielen see who else is out there and who else would possibly be available next year depending on how our wide receiver room shakes up because it's going to be a lot different because Old Dale uh I mean I think now Old Dale's been trending more towards staying but still we don't know we won't know till we know um but Nelson Aguilar one year deal Devin Duvenay last year his deal so yeah we'll we'll see what happens with our receivers uh he also said since OBJ possibly isn't going to sign with us possibly next year and even though he's had flashes he isn't worth 15 mil well he said I would think Thielen would be a bigger threat and get more from them than OBJ oh well uh maybe health wise yeah um but I think what would OBJ was deeper than just everything on the field I think it was everything off to just the attention that that superstar status them keeping their quarterback like OBJ brings some a lot of stuff that a lot of receivers just don't and that's before he even steps on the field so that's something to think about next question came from my guy BB he said what the absence of Mark Andrews in this offense do you think Devin Duvenay will get more of an opportunity yeah I think so a little bit not too much but a little bit he said looking if we look back Duvenay was a number one receiver for the past two years yeah at times he was uh truthfully he is a silent staple in this offense and needs to be used more uh also okay so we'll start with that that Devin Duvenay part yeah jet sweep king that's what he was but the Baltimore Ravens this year they removed his crown and they gave it to Prince Zay flowers they made him the jet sweep prince uh Devin Duvenay is no longer the king um but yeah man so I can see him being used a little bit more just just a little bit more bringing him in a couple plays here and there um but again it's it's a lot in front of him and you know what when we're in the previous question or a couple of questions ago when he brought up Tylen Wallace I don't even think we mentioned Devin Duvenay as one of the receivers that could be in front of Tylen Wallace too but even with Devin Duvenay it's a lot in front of him um Ravens can find ways to use them for sure but it's still a lot in front of him anyway he said also with the Chargers struggling to stop the pass Ravens should take full advantage of airing out the ball to multiple players that haven't got the chance to be involved to prepare for this playoff run now I love that because what that could do Ravens like this is a big game for them because this game could set this game sets the tone or it helps set the tone for that last chunk of the season because you play the Chargers tonight something like football and then for the next you're off for the next two weeks and then when you come back and you need this break big time because Ravens have played a lot of football they've done a lot of traveling and they've had played a lot of games in a short amount of time so you need this break but if you can go into this break after a very very nice win against the Chargers that'll set you up real nice and that'll give you a nice confidence boost that'll give you a nice momentum heading into your buy and then coming out of the buy who do they play after the buy I think it's the Rams I think and the T Bank I think but I'm not 100% sure but anyway that'll be really nice so yeah air it out run that ball to whatever you got to do win all right he said we know the league is based on next man up so getting these few players up to speed in case something happens is imperative also do you think Jadavian Clowney should be a Raven till he retires hey if it was up to me he would have been a Raven long time ago well yeah I mean the way that he's been playing yeah it's so funny how how stuff just takes a turn because I remember when the Ravens were first talking about Jadavian Clowney I saw a lot of people say oh no please no not Jadavian Clowney he sucks he's overrated he's injured probably he's this he's that and now I see some of the Ravens fans saying oh we should sign him to an extension I love the turnaround he said Kyle Hamilton is the best pick EDC has made in his tenor as a GM and he said hashtag Hamilton defensive player of the year shout out to him next question came from my god David who is a team keep it clean patron I appreciate you David he said ain't graven it's been a while since I sent a question but I got a simple one here do you think it's crazy to say that Kyle Hamilton may be our best player on the team yes it's not extremely crazy but it is a little crazy and I'm gonna tell you why but let me finish your question first he said I think that there's definitely a chance to say that he's up there in a tier that's only occupied by he and Lamar Jackson okay I'm glad I read the whole thing because that's what I was gonna say like when you think oh and he said thanks again for all you do for the Ravens in this big community let's go team keep it clean now I appreciate you David thank you for everything that you do now um what I was gonna say is if it's the best player on your team or even one of the best players on your team then I think uh you got to think about how the team does with them what they do for the team obviously but if the team could go on without them and how the team would be without them now with Kyle Hamilton we know everything that he does for the team everything he does for the defense like he is everywhere that dude ain't no regular safety he ain't no safety he's a baller that's his position but um if the Ravens didn't have a Kyle Hamilton for a couple of games how would that be versus if they didn't have a Lamar Jackson for a couple of games so I um Kyle Hamilton is amazing and we ain't take we cannot take nothing from him we not taking nothing from him so don't think that but I will say the best player on the team uh is Lamar Jackson now this last question more so a comment it came from my guy the legit goat um I can't read the whole thing and I'm gonna tell you I will understand afterwards he said Aang Raven just wanted to let the entire Ravens flock know uh if they would like to stream all the Ravens games or any NFL game and he said it's it's an app that you could use I can't say that on here because that would go like like think about this like my job is YouTube YouTube Google all that the people who have Sunday ticket right now is YouTube YouTube Google and all that now if I if I'm sitting here hey everybody this is a way that you can go against the grain and you could beat the system by doing it this way and it goes directly against my employer so yeah yeah no so I appreciate what you're doing legit goat and I get it and if anybody would like to know what he said you could just send me a DM or something but uh yeah you you get it so I hope that you get it hopefully but anyway team keeping clean this was a fun uh episode of questions from subscribers I loved it this rapid fire rapid fire just non-stop no edit straightforward let's get it let's make it happen I love it because it's so fun man I always appreciate you all's questions man I always thank you for that uh because it makes a big difference and it just makes this that much more fun um so y'all keep doing what y'all been doing uh thank you for support make sure you subscribe to the channel and turn your notifications on I will see you all later on tonight for the Ravens charges Sunday night football man been waiting all day for Sunday night and I know it's gonna be a lot of Ravens man saying man today's going by so slow it's taking forever man why don't we just get there man I hate Sunday night football games but it's okay because all the time that you're gonna spend waiting today for the game to start imagine how slow the next two weeks are gonna go


Hey, have you ever heard someone say that packer identifiers can tell you if a file is packed? This is not true. Let's talk about that. By the way, if you haven't seen my video about packer misconceptions yet, please watch it before that one. So what is the difference between detection and identification? Detection answers the question of whether a file is packed or not. Detection on the other hand answers the question what packer was used to create the packed file. Tools like PEID or detected easy are so-called packer identifiers. These tools can sometimes tell you the names of legitimate packers, installers, compilers or wrappers that created the file. Legitimate packers are those that are used to pack both clean and malicious files. Because they are legitimate, they have visible patterns in the decryption step, sometimes even their name in the section names. For instance, Vibu code meters section names are __vibu00 and so on. They do not have a reason to hide that. You can look up these patterns in the signature databases of PEID if you are curious.  In contrast malware packers are only used to pack malware. Their main purpose is antivirus evasion. For that reason antivirus products will detect their stub over time. As we have seen and understood from the last video, old un-maintained malware packers create files which are detected by antivirus scanners, even if you pack calc.exe with them. These malware packers, if they are reasonably made, do their best to not have any obvious names or patterns in the decryption step that the antivirus can pick up easily. For that reason they are not detected by identifiers like PEID or detected easy. Why is it useful to identify the packer? Because you can find unpacking tools for them and simply google information about them that help you unpack the file. What about packer detectors? Is there something like that? There are some tools that can determine heuristically if a file is packed, but they do not perfectly detect a packed file. They just assume it based on common characteristics of packed files. You do not need these automatic tools as an analyst though. For you, the actual characteristics are interesting to know how to proceed with analysis or unpacking. But let's first talk about how dynamic unpacking usually works. I told you that packer identifiers do not tell you if a file is packed. Beginners who assume that they do often fall into a particular trap. They unpack a file based on a tutorial, drag and drop the unpacked file into PEID and it still shows the file is being packed by upx. So they assume they failed and did not really unpack anything when actually they did everything right. Why does this happen? A packed file on disk usually looks like that. It has the decryption stub and somewhere the encrypted target file. The header of the file tells Windows the entry point where to start execution. The entry point points to the stub because that is the part responsible for decrypting the target file. That obviously needs to happen before it can be executed. Members that unpacked the file in their own process often define a zero-sized section on disk that will have a bigger size in memory. This section is meant to hold the decrypted data of the target file and because it is not needed on disk its raw size is zero. In memory the zero-sized section has now grown and is empty at first. The stub first decrypts the encrypted data, then writes it into our zero-filled section. After that it passes execution to the decrypted target file. Now what happens if you want to unpack the file? You stop execution at this point at the so-called original entry point or OEP. That is the address of the first instruction in the target file. So you stop execution here and in the header you change the entry point to the original entry point. So that target is executed directly. You do not need the stub anymore once the file is unpacked. Now look at your dump. You may already see the answer to your question. Unless you deliberately removed the stub from the dump, the stub code is still in there. If we now put our unpacked file into PEID it will still detect a pattern in the dump. Some patterns of PEID are dependent on the entry point and would not match anymore but others will still identify the packer that the stub belongs to. Time is true for detect it easy or any other tool that searches for patterns in the stub or in the headers. And that is why packer identifiers do not tell you if a file is packed. So now the question becomes how do I know if a file is packed? There are some signs for that. For instance, often times there is high entropy where the encrypted target file is placed. You may remember the common target file locations from the last video. Those are something to look out for. The entropy of the whole file is not that relevant but local entropies can tell you where the target file might be. Strings are often almost non-existent in the packed files. But then there are of course some packer authors who got the idea to use word lists and fill the decryption stubs with random English words to make it seem more legitimate. The same happens with imports. Packed files do not have many of them but sometimes they include garbage inputs on purpose. Or you deal with, for instance, .NET assemblies which often have only one PE import regardless if they are packed. So there are exceptions to every rule. Depending on how the packed file is structured, the decryption stub may also inject the target file into a child process. The presence of import combinations, which are typical for injection, may indicate that. Load library and get proc address are a common pair of APIs imported to resolve imports dynamically. The import reserving is something that decryption stubs commonly do to provide the proper imports for the target file. The presence of the child process, which is attached to the same executable is also an indicator of packed files. Taking triage, this is something you will commonly see in a sandbox report and can already tip you off that this might be a packed file using self-injection. We also saw in our dynamic unpacking example that a small or zero raw size section that is bigger in memory can be an indicator for a packed file. Large base 64 strings are also typical. Among checking the strings of a file I recommend to use byteplot visualizations and to look out for areas with ASCII color pixels. For instance in Portex Analyzer these are blue areas. Base 64 strings, which are large enough to hold, a PM image are often also big enough to show up there.  There are more possibilities but these are the most common ones. You might notice that a lot of these are also true for droppers. Droppers are not packed files in contrast, to packed files they drop the payload on disk and execute it. But since they have to carry an often encrypted payload and also work in some ways similar to packer steps, some of these signs are present in them as well. How do you know if it is a packed file or a dropper? Thankfully that is easy to answer, you run the dropper either in a sandbox or use a tool like process monitor. If these tools show that the dropper writes a file and executes it, check if that file is a copy of the original or if it's a different file. If it's a different file then it's a dropper. If it's the same file it is just a way for the malware to put itself into the right place for instance as a preparation for persistence. What you should notice by looking at this list is that you cannot tell if a file is packed based on these horistics alone. To be sure of that you will actually have to disassemble or decompile the file, read the code and try to unpack the target. I can tell you this was something that made me very a lot as a beginner. I thought if I don't get this question right at first try I'm failing as an analyst. The truth is, malware analysis involves a lot of guessing. After guessing you collect proof by following the lead of your guess. If that turns out to be wrong and you disprove your guess, you take some steps back, make another guess, then rinse and repeat until you get proof for every guess that's relevant for your analysis report. What I'm saying is don't worry. Take a good guess and if that turns out to be wrong, that's fine. That is the usual workflow of malware analysis and not a sign that you failed. Experienced analysts are as clueless as you are when try aging a file. They just know how to find and follow the leads faster.


and another one. What's up people of the manner here coming to you with the video. This time we are going to be looking at Pop Voice PV510 microphone. I had the Pop Voice PV610 microphone. That one is only 6 foot. This one is a whopping 12 foot. So basically when I'm working outside when I'm recording videos or if I want to be in the front of the camera which might be happening soon stay tuned. I can use this mic and be in the front of the camera and I can be as far as 12 foot away. Let's get started. These are the dimensions of the product along with the support information. This is a website. You can buy it from Amazon by the way and it can be used for your smartphone, your tablet, your laptop and your PC. So it is versatile. Sorry if you don't have a headphone jack you might have to get a USB adapter. Similar to the PV610 this one is very nicely packaged and this is the UPC code. Comes when it's own pouch so you can put it with your camera gear. Most of the camera gear is already black so this will blend right through. This is the instructions. The thing that I did notice is the PV610 plus does have different color micro tips. This one only comes in black. It also has an adapter and this is the cable and wow this is really long. So it's going to be definitely useful for field use. I'm going to pause the video. I'm going to plug in I'm going to disconnect the PV610. I'm going to record some voice on the phone and then I'm going to record the voice on 510. This is the voice that you're hearing from PV610 connected to my chest. This is the voice you're hearing from the PV510 connected to my chest. Same exact location tapping the mic to see if it picks up rubbing the microphone, rubbing the shirt, rubbing the cord. Hopefully nothing carries through. And this is the mic volume that you're hearing directly from the cell phone. And now we're back to PV610 microphone.  Certainly do not discount this microphone. It is a pretty long cable definitely will get the job done. You can connect it to your camera gear and go out in the field be 12 foot away from it and you can definitely have an amazing audio at a very reasonable price. As always like, comment, subscribe and I will see you guys on gals on the next one. Later people. Bye.


Okay, this month we are here in the month of November with a new design team around the videos. I have challenged the designers this month to use embossing with my stamps or stencils in conjunction with their art. You know, embossing powder is one of those things for those of us who got away from scrapbooking and that sort of thing we kind of forgot about, right? We have it. It's in a drawer underneath, mine's underneath my table. I've got a whole drawer of embossing powders and supplies and I just always forget about using them. This month I'm still not going to get the supplies out, at least not on camera, but I am going to show you a card here that I received from my dear friend Peg Robinson. She did a wonderful job. She did a video on these and I am going to try to remember to link it in the description below. Somebody remind me if I forget. And this is actually one of my stamps that she bought. You have to use one of the finer embossing powders to get all the details in some of my stamps, but they do emboss beautifully. She embossed this on white paper with white embossing powder and then activated it and then she water-colored over it and acted like a resist. Look at the beautiful detail she got, isn't it wonderful? And I added it to my year 2017 journal. I really love that and there's a lot of other things you can do with embossing powder and embossing with my stamps. I really hope you guys give them a try and see what you can come up with. I would love to see that. Really I would like to see somebody and I might have to try to see if we can take a really juicy embossing ink pad and squish it through a stencil and then lift the stencil up and then sprinkle powder. That might be really cool. So anyway, embossing. I think you can do it. The team has come up with some really great ideas this month. I want you to give them a shot and give them a look. All of their video links are in the description below. As per usual, we've updated the blog and everything else at the same time, so give it a shot and see what you think. And I hope you all have a great day and do something nice for yourself because you deserve it. And I'll see you later. Bye guys.


Now I present to you James B. Madonna and the rep for Dr. William J. Eisenman. Okay, we're here. You're here. We're here. Hey, hey, hey. It sounds like Parliament in the UK. Hey, hey.  Something to do. In Parliament. In the court. In the court. Damn. My Uncle John used to smoke cigarettes called Parliament. Yes, they were around. What was I correct? Is that the name of them? That's correct.  Well, Uncle John is still with us. Bless his heart. Uncle John, I salute you. I salute Uncle John. Yes. He gave up smoking eons ago. The other ones didn't. Welcome everyone. Welcome to Uncensored Heart Hitting Truth. I am your host James P. Madonna of Megalife 21 and I am here with my illustrious co-host and mentor and the very founder of Newsletter Censored in 1977, the one and only, the Reverend Dr. William J. Eisenman. How are you feeling this week, sir? Good. Good. It's the end. But I don't like this winter continuing. It's the end of April 2015, but you wouldn't think it was spring by the weather we've been having in the northeast of the United States here in New Jersey. It's been cold, man. It's been an extended elongated seven month winter. I mean, I'm not saying we're getting snow and ice, but the wind chill, the temperatures, a lot of wind, which is to be expected, rain, yes, but temperature wise it's been pretty cold.  All right.  They're building a roof.  I swear to you. They're building a pitched roof. I'll give them a pitched roof. The mobile home. Idiots interfering with such a powerful cause here. Whoa! They're putting a roof on, man.  This is newsletter censored. This is uncensored, hard hitting truth. This is capitalism in a conch show beyond thunderconk. That's what the... Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Mad Max. Beyond thunderconk because I'm going to get very blunt and straight to the point and it's not going to be kind. I'm not going to sugarcoat anything, but I'm tired of pussy-footing around worrying about who's going to get offended because that's got to stop. Starting with this week's show and capitalism in a conch show beyond thunderconk. All right? All right. Let's get to it. You see, any poor or middle class person in the United States or the world for that matter, because there are problems with conservatives and corporatism in other areas like Australia with racism towards Aborigines, Shawnee Harris, my friend Shawnee Harris, Aboriginal civil rights activists from Western Australia, from the Outback. I send my greetings and the right-wing corporatism is even worse over there and the racism, it's neck and neck with the United States, but I think they're having a more severe problem with the conservative races. Because it's always been there. And when the first settlers were there to crook on Australia. The mentality, the European invader mentality is the same as it was in the United States when they settled the United States. They're better than the savages.  Anybody who's not like them is a savage. Now even in Brazil the Aborigines, the indigenous people, they are protesting too because Brazil is trying to take their land. So it's all over. The government of Brazil is trying to steal their land from the native people of Brazil and they're doing in the United States, the Republicans are trying to steal reservation land that belongs to Native Americans from them. So it seems to be, there seems to be a pattern, Australia, they're stealing sacred aboriginal land for profit, for corporatism and the sake of corporatism. Hold up the conch, hold up the conch, hold up the conch, because that's where it is. That's where it is. Now you see the pattern that's happening here with conservative corporatism and the right wing and all stemming from the white European monarchy, the invaders, it all falls into place, the mindset, the way of thinking, historical events, the persecution and abuse of indigenous people throughout the world. There's a pattern here forming. You know what I mean? Yeah, the pattern is green. You got it. You got land I want. I have the power to take it, I'm going to take it. So they're going to take it by force, extortion. Might make right. And they're going to force you to accept their cultist religion by the sword. And then I will write history and I will write it in my favor, Pally. Now the right wing, zealot, evangelical fundamentalists in the United States like the douchebag wears a Mike Huckabee. Mike Huckabee. He'll bring down fire from heaven. Mike Huckabee and Michelle Bubblehead Bachman and Rick should be in a sanitarium sanatorium.   They're preoccupied with gay people. And Huckabee said now he's saying that gay people will end up criminalizing Christians.  So there seems to be a proclivity and a preoccupation with the rectum with right wingers. They have a preoccupation with sex, period. Any kind of sex. Any kind of pleasure. Right. Okay. They have a problem with that because they can't feel it. I've told you how many times they lack oxytocin. Yeah, but when you say that, when you say it that way, it makes people pity them. They're evil. They shouldn't be pityed. They don't deserve to be pityed. Well, whoever pities them, you know, that's a problem. Because you don't pity a person, whether he has a disability or not. If he gets into a position of power and starts putting in policies that hurt you. Hurt the poor. And send hungry children to bed hungry and take money away from the poor and veterans. Like in Florida with Rick Scott, the Q-tip head, making it illegal to feed the homeless in, what is it, over 30 states now? 33, I think. 33 states. Of course, they have Republican governors, right? No, it's not states, it's cities. Oh, it's city to city. It's illegal to feed the homeless.  Bonehead.  Bonehead is too kind. Imbissile. Moron. Bonehead. All right. We'll throw bonehead in here. Let me get back to that thing before I forget it, though.  Anybody who pities a Hitler, there's something wrong, okay? That you don't do. You cannot pity evil. Well, I think the class warfare is perpetuated by the elitists and the right wing is the present day evil. Well, it is an evil, yes, for sure.  Ask yourself a simple question. If you live in a red state and you're poor or middle-class, what has the Republican senators, congressmen, and governors that you vote for, how have they collectively affected your life? Is your standard of living any higher? Is your life any easier by electing these Republicans? All class two, not just poor, think to yourself. Are things getting worse for you? Are they the same? Are they better? I can almost guarantee that they're worse. Yeah, but we've got to stop those gays. Now you're talking- We've got to stop people from having a border. Now, what you're saying is you're putting their religious zealot cult above the basics, their bread and butter, survival, paying the bills, putting a roof over their head, food on the table, clothes on their back. How does our Republicans get voted for? You're putting the cult ahead of survival. In a nutshell, you've just explained why they continue to get supporters.  Okay, of course. Because a cult, even a religion, even if you quote the Bible accurately, which Republicans never do because they don't know the Bible, even if you quoted it and you knew it was inside of it, it's still not a proven fact. It's an ideology. It's based on faith, which is hope. It's not proven. To proven science, cold hard facts of science, you don't have a pot to piss in, you don't have enough food in the refrigerator in your cabinets. Maybe they don't have a refrigerator. You're wearing socks with holes in it, underwear with holes in it. You're living in a paycheck to paycheck, even if you have a job. If you have a job. If you happen to have a job, being that the Republicans have arranged it so employers can do whatever they want, you know, you might be working long hours for less pay. You may not, well, thank God for Obamacare, I mean, now you got some healthcare going. But if your life has not improved, and if it's gotten worse, even if you're middle class or poor, there's no reason for you to vote Republican.   Your two coats. And feed them. And if you have meat, invite them to the feast. What about? Farmers, they're supposed to leave a percentage of their crops outside, yes, for the poor and the widows and and homeless and everything to go in there and eat. And harvest, yeah. But the point is, what that is saying is you are required, if you have the things of this world, you are required to not help the poor per se, but to make the poor no longer poor. That's the problem with our social programs.  Is it about one percent of the total budget social services and what about corporations claiming ownership of the earth's natural resources and withholding it for profit from people, from living things? I mean, in the old days, they just, you know, the country went in there with their military and they took over and they took over the resources. So now, of course, they got to use a little bit of mind work to get them these days. Well, they want to privatize everything. Well, yes. I heard Chris Christie privatize water in New Jersey. Water in New Jersey. You know, in South America, I was told when they privatized water, when they privatized the utilities, it was disastrous. It didn't work. Privatization never works in the long run. Milton Friedman bagging in South America with the Pinochet and the other dictators in Argentina, et cetera, it didn't work.      But yet he found political support from the right wing. Right. And I also, I and Rand probably had deep personal issues that made her write her books and tout her selfishness as a virtue. Yeah, well, her.  Well, look at people like, hey, didn't somebody recently tell off Ann Coulter? Yes, they did. Yeah, yeah. Well, anyway, I mean, look. That slowed her down, didn't it? You got it. Listen, you got to grab the bull by the horns with the right wing. You can't pussyfoot around. You got to get tough. You got to be real tough. And this is why they have been walking all over progressive liberals because you got you have you have people like when Nancy Pelosi was a speaker of the House, was it? All she kept on saying is bipartisanship, compromise, bipartisanship. But she she wanted to make friends. No, with the enemy. She wanted to govern. Well, every time you compromise with them, you lose. The people lose every time. Well, that depends. That always depends. You didn't lose. You didn't do lose back in under Dwight the Ivan hour when you had bipartisanship. It used to work. It no longer works because of the right wing ideology. They cannot. They will not ever change their convictions. Well, maybe the Republican Party during in the 1950s during Dwight the Eisenhower was not as extreme to the right. Ideological. As they are today. They probably were not as corpetist as they are today. That, too. Well, to give the Pentagon was not as popular and big as it was Dwight the Eisenhower warned against the military industrial complex back then. Well, I listened to that video with George Carlin again. I mean, the guy who was the guy's way out of his time. He was right on the money. He was right on the money. I mean, he summed it all up about how the system is rigged and who controls everything. And they're all they're all bought out. And today Republicans have one agenda. And the agenda is to destroy the middle class.  Of course, the classes underneath go down, too.  That's it. Now, wheels in the cog of industry. All right, two examples. Or cogs in the wheel of industry. Two examples, a Pope John franchise.  A New York City M-star pizza who owned seven Pope Johns was ordered to pay $800,000 in wage theft. OK. And of course, the CEO of Pope John, he's the one that refused to give health care to his employees. And he also said that the prosperity of the company, he is not obligated to share with his employees the prosperity of Papa John's pizza, which means that that is a prime example of how trickle down does not work because they won't allow it to work. They won't allow it to work. That's an example of when you let corporations get too big, too much influence. That's what you're doing. You know, trickling, when you're stealing wages and you refuse to give health care and you claim that if the company improves, it's not going to, you're not going to benefit from it. That's not trickle down. What it is is siphon up economics. Siphon up to the top 20%. The devil's economics. Yeah, we had that since the 90s. That was a siphon, by the way.  Chris Christie, bless his heart, bless his fat, blubbery heart. In total, he gave away $5.4 billion in corporate subsidies. All tax payers money. While cutting school aid, cutting property relief, and cutting and skipping pension payments, you know, in other words, you footed the bill, the free corporate welfare. You paid for it. But when it comes time for you to expect a little help from your governor, Chris Christie, you got turned down. But his rich buddies were not turned down and they got all this free money. Oh, then we'll provide jobs. And we'll provide jobs. Where? Well, it hasn't worked in New Jersey. It hasn't worked elsewhere either, but, you know, but they keep doing it. In a way, in a way, it hasn't really worked in China, India, Bangladesh, or whatever, because those people, those so-called jobs that they created in the third world countries are like almost not having a job at all. I mean, what is it in China? 32 cents an hour at Foxconn. 50 cents an hour in the Philippines for office work. 50 cents to a dollar. Bangladesh, I think, is like 14 cents an hour. I know a guy who works for Mercedes-Benz here in... Where are they there? Up in Rochelle Park or something? Mercedes-Benz. Bergen County somewhere? Oh, yeah. They're right here. $15 an hour. What does he do? He does... He seems to be well-educated in what he does. He's on the phone, not a telemarker or anything like that. Fire?  In other words, though, he has to have that knowledge. Help desk. No, it's not one of those things. He has to have the knowledge of the... Automotive. Mechanic. Etc. To do this job for $15 an hour. So he'll get information about your vehicle and he'll give you an estimate of something? You can do a lot of stuff before he turns you over to somebody else. Right. You can say, look, I need a part from my car. Do you have it in stock? Well, he's not a stock man either. It's more than that. It's more than that. Then he deserves more. Like to help this, do you say, well, they just put you on to somebody else. Well, if he has that kind of knowledge, he deserves more than $15 an hour. That's correct. That's my point. And now they've shipped them down to Atlanta to do some work for that. For $15 an hour. What is the word? What, though? Relocation for a lousy $15 an hour? To Atlanta? That's my point.  That's Trump change. Well, that's what they've done today. They've made important jobs into non-important. That's supposed to be a more accurate minimum wage, not for skilled labor. Well, not minimum wage. That's for sure. $15 an hour. That's Trump change for a knowledgeable skilled person. And not only that, they keep him at below 40 hours so that they don't pay him full time. That's bullshit, that Eizki. But they've had the laws to do that. He had to relocate to Atlanta? No, no, no. He'd come back in a couple of days. He's down there doing work for them. At $15 an hour. At $15 an hour.  That's what we have, ladies and gentlemen. Control by the corporations and the plutocococococococacy. The ultimate douchebag award. Of course, the Papa John franchise owners. Oh, he's practicing him, yes. And that big douchebag, the CEO, should have wrote down his name. Every time there's an article about Papa John, they show his face. But they never print his name. He's not Italian. He has nothing to do with how to make a real pizza. That's for sure.   You can see, you can tell by the, he does all the Papa John commercials because he probably doesn't want to pay professional commercial actors and actresses, and he does it himself. And of course, I mentioned right wing pastors there. Of course, they're ultimate douchebags. But every week they come out with preposterous, despicable, utterly ridiculous statements, the right wing. I mean, they all do. Face time, and they get influence. And they get people who admire them. And nobody from the media calls them out, challenges them, rebuttals them. No. None. You're not going to get any of that in corporate media. No matter how assin-hine they sound. No. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Yeah, I was listening to a video last night with Howard Stern criticizing, oh, man. I forgot who it was.  Howard Stern's a very intelligent person. I hear they're pushing for mandatory vaccinations in California. What about here? That's mandatory slow genocide of the mainstream masses. Oh, well, a new thing just came out and said there's no connection between vaccinations and autism.  Lies. OK. Lies from Big Pharma. You know, that's another. I was listening to Noma Chomsky. And he was describing what has happened, like since the 1950s. In the 1950s, your big powerful corporations and, et cetera, were in the electronics fields and stuff of that nature. Today it's Big Pharma and those fields, which are in power. Because that's where the big bucks are. That's great. In other words, instead of doing what would benefit mankind, which would be high technology, electronics, other things, the green movement, they chose to invest their money in pharmaceuticals in poisons. Well, that's what grew, you see. And that's why we're paying so much for health care in this country compared to all the other countries, et cetera. That's where the money goes. Siphoning up. And that's why when you walk into a doctor's office, the first thing out of their mouth is what kind of insurance do you have?  No, no, what kind of insurance do you have? What's your problem? What are you here for? Well, first it's insurance. Insurance. Motherfuckers. Then you gotta fill out the forms and then maybe they'll ask you what are you here for? What's wrong? Well, you never see the doctor with the appointment they give you.  You have two waiting rooms.  The little waiting room.  I remember spending, I'm going to see my urologist once and, you know, you put you in a room, you're sitting in a room there and he gets a phone call in another room and I could hear what's going on. He's talking to his broker. He's yakking with his spanking broker. I'm sitting in the room. Yeah. I only had, most urologists seem to be men. I only had one woman check me out and she did it in a nanosecond, like almost like she was nervous or embarrassed or something. I don't think so. It was like really freaking quick, you know. Did you grab your ball and take off? No, not even, no, no. Well, that's an inadequate, you know, examination.  That's right. Your gonads, jiggle them around a little bit. Make a little squeeze, they call it a ball.  Whereas my grandfather used to say, prostrate. Prostrate. How do I prostrate, chicks? Laying on the ground. Prostrate. Prostrate, prostrate. All right, let us- Actually, when I went to here, I never got the finger. Never got the finger thingy. You never got your prostate jiggled? No, because when I went, when I went, I was distended because there was no exit. What? No exit for the PP. What do you mean no exit? The PP was blocked. You had a block and would not come out. You had a block ureter? Not the ureter. Urethra? The bladder, probably. Oh, the bladder? Or the prostate. Oh, that's bad. You mean the urine, you couldn't pass urine? No, passing urine. That could be toxic, right? When I was undistended by the catheter, it was well over two liters. That gushed out.  No, what happened was I- Two liters. I had taken a herb product for post polio and it contained ephedra. And ephedra blew up the prostate. Really? Ephedra can do that. All of your life, your congestion relievers which have ephedra in them and, you know, a suit of fed, all these things, that can do that. Can do that. You know, I had this comfort down here when I was taking DHEA one time. No, I never had any problems with DHEA. Well, they do have it in 10 milligrams in capsule form now. I only do five. Milligrams? Yeah. Yeah, they have it in a swanson. Is it micrograms or milligrams? Micro. No, milla, milla, milla. Five, five milligrams. Wait a minute. You know, milligrams. Wait a minute, 25. 25. 25 is for women, I think. Five, 10. Five, 10. Well, it depends on the age of the woman, too. Yeah, 25 I do it. The older you are, the more a candidate you are for DHEA. It's an over-the-counter hormone. I'd say it's about two steps away from free testosterone in the blood. Well, it helps with producing your other hormones. And all like pregnant alone. Procursor? Yeah, it's a precursor. Oh, okay, it's produced by the adrenals, by the adrenal glands, DHEA, and then it depletes with age. Yes. Declines them. All right, let's sink our teeth into these readings. All right, I have a large section here on the situation with Dr. Oz. Oh, yes. I don't think I'm going to need to read all of it, but let's get a general idea of what's going on here. It sounds like a frog, right? Dr. Oz. Dr. Mehmet Oz. Dr. Mehmet Oz says last week's attack Mehmet Mehmet by 10 doctors who accused him of promoting quack treatments Oh, still gotta prove it. On his TV show was spurred by his vocal support for labeling genetically modified foods. And that's all he did. He was right. He was correct. A stance that he says some, if not all of those accusers oppose. Oh, heaven forbid, we should know what we put on our bodies as a consumer. No, no, no. Because then we won't buy the product. Too bad. Well, we have to buy the product. I don't have to do anything. You know, those corporations need us to buy the product. My loyalty is to my well-being health included and my wallet. Oh, excuse me. The diagnostic statistical manual now has a designation for you. Yes. For people who are interested in their health. Yes. Yes, they do.  Where we have officially. So it is a neurosis. It is a compulsive neurosis to be a health nut. That's great. To be a concern with one's health. That's great. To seek optimum health. That's great. That's okay. That's great. That's okay. And of course, you know, the oppositional, what you're gonna call it, the thing against authority. That also is a mental illness. Yeah, I don't like to follow orders. Dr. Raj lives in Cliffside Park, New Jersey. Oh, well. Devoted for the first half of his syndicated show on Thursday to his response. We're not far from Cliffside Park. No. To what he called a brazen letter from 10 mysterious doctors. Brazen. Well, the quackbusters always work from behind the scenes, you know. Well, you know. They don't step out because they will not debate you. Oz is not, Dr. Oz is not alone. There are many people with lots of evidence that GMOs are toxic. It don't, well, they don't just involve GMOs. I mean, these quackbusters are after anybody who does not hold to the official line of medicine. Let me ask you a question. Do they also defend vaccines? Yes, they do. The quackbusters? The quackbusters do, yes. In other words, they're a big pharma corporate whores. Yes, they are. But, you know, they don't like you to find that out. Well, I'm saying it. I know, but they don't like you to find that out. It's very obvious. There were several, there were many times when like they would go on shows and debate people and the show sponsor or whatever would never tell you that they are beholding to this, that and the other corporation or FDA or big pharma or whatever. Well, because they're, the station managers or whatever their corporate suckups, they have sponsors, you know. It's up to the people to determine, ascertain the truth. By listening. Well, hey, the elites know best, don't they? For us?  Don't they know best? They live high on the hog, we don't. So why should I worry about what they care about? Anyway, these 10 mysterious doctors sent to Columbia University where Oz is vice chairman of the surgery department and performs heart surgery at New York Presbyterian, Columbia's affiliated hospital. The letter accused him of egregious lack of integrity and urged the university to remove him from the faculty. So he, Dr. Oz is a form of whistleblower. Which is supposed to be a person who is doing their job and is heroic. Well, yeah, but even besides that. Honest person. He has a First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Yes. Does he not? Hey, if he doesn't, you might as well just tell the American people that we're tossing the Constitution and the Bill of Rights right into the sewer. Well, as George Bush was supposedly have said, it's just a goddamn piece of paper. Wow. And he's right, because if you don't enforce it. It's paper.  Hey, if two people don't adhere to their marriage vows, marriage is just a damn piece of paper. Well, yeah. If people, you know. And in politics, if you just have two ideas bang heads with each other, you know, no resorting to facts or science or something else. It's just one idea against another idea. And they'll be like two big horn sheep knocking heads, button heads forever. Now until eternity. Yeah, like that little science toy.  You take the one and bang, bang, bang, bang, bang.  Absolutely, absolutely. A Columbia spokesman defended Dr. Oz by saying the school is committed to the principle of academic freedom. But the letter set off a new round of criticism of Dr. Oz who has been slammed for promoting questionable cure-alls. And last June appeared before the Senate's consumer protection panel where he was scolded for claims he had made on his show about weight loss aids. I believe that was Garcinia Cambosia that he was. And the green bean coffee. Oh, well, green coffee. They work. Well, that's what he was saying. Claims, he says, he has stopped making. Hey, Chromium Pacola, they work too. You know, I mean, these things, they all work and they all have lots of evidence to support them. If one cares to read them. Now you got to do something there. If they're there, if one cares to read them. But if you are of the officialdom, you don't read them. Then you tell me one time Garinol went to court and he had tons of evidence on his side. He went to a debate with that, too. And he dropped down on the stage. What? Thousands of pages of studies and et cetera. But nobody cared. They didn't care. In fact, he had a run-in one time with one quackbuster and he wanted to give him some of the stuff. Old fashioned knuckle sandwich. He wanted to give him some of the studies and et cetera to read so that it might help him. And then the guy said, I don't want them. Yeah, because the guy's a corporate whore. Yeah, well, he didn't think he could be educated anymore, either.  It's arrogance. Oh yeah. Suppose your doctor went to school 20 years ago. Right? Yeah. Suppose your doctor went to school 20 years ago. Right. And he hasn't kept up in the meantime, just been doing his practice and et cetera, et cetera. Oh man. What kind of doctor is that? An old country doctor. Yeah, yeah. Like Bones McCoy. But at least he had, yeah, Bones had, you know. Now Bones was good.  Yeah, I know what you mean.  Went to the A. Got laughing gas. Laughing gas? Ah! Nah, you got a lighter cane, over cane. Come on, laughing gas. Those things, too. What's someone amuse the laughing gas? But, um, yeah, you gotta keep up. You gotta keep up with, huh?  Or do something. You know, that has been done. Yes, it has. There was a dentist who was notorious for doing that. Oh, yeah. New Yorker writer, Michael Spector, who profiled Dr. Oz for that magazine two years ago, said on NPR this week that, whereas every doctor's first obligation is to do no harm, ha ha ha! Oz does harm every time he goes on the air! Oh, and if, oh, and if Oz was, and I used to call Oz a big pharma whore, can you imagine these quackbusters? They're real whores. So pushing toxic drugs and vaccines, that's doing good for the patient. That's doing good. Well, you know, it's like this. The doctors of officialdom want you to die of their treatment, which does not work, rather than have a treatment that might work or does work. Okay? My family doctor only believes in, There you go. In like a few supplements. Omega-3 fish oils, vitamin D, and you know, you could take a calcium here and there. Other than that, he don't put any stock in anything, but his drugs. I have a lady friend who's doctor has just told her to take vitamin D-3. And she doesn't take anything else.  But I told her, I said, well, the only reason that your doctor is asking you to take D-3 right now is because they have changed what used to be the RDA for that particular vitamin. That's all. Not only that. They're acknowledging that vitamin D does a lot more than just help you absorb calcium into your bones. But for how many years did they say, don't take any more than 400 microguts? I know. No more. Toxic. It's toxic. Vitamin D is very important for the immune system, just like vitamin A, you know? Absolutely. Which is, well, I will be taking very soon this mega cod liver oil because I wish to have my A and D, a 100% animal source from fish livers. Fish liver oil. Yeah, there was something the other day in some program and they were, oh yeah, there's an attack right now against beta-carotene. Well, synthetic beta-carotene is a problem with it. Right, exactly. Exactly. And that is exactly what they are putting in for vitamin A in many, many multis now. You're right about that. It's the beta-carotene. It's either the synthetic beta-carotene or a combination of that and palmitate. Retinol palmitate, which is a dry... Yeah, I don't have a problem with the palmitate, but like the fish oil, the natural source, is like down to 40% of those 10,000 IUs, you know? I'll let you know. So that's like 6,000 IUs of fake beta-carotene and the other four or whatever, you know? It's the dry form. Yeah, I like the oil-based animal source vitamin A. Pre-formed. Right, retinol. Retinol, oh well, from animal source in a fat-soluble form. Anyway, he does harm by recommending things for which there's no evidence. But they won't read the evidence. Bingo, so there's no evidence for them. In other words, I see nothing. I hear nothing. Sergeant Schultz from Hogan Zeroes. Listen, it's so preposterous. Let's say this was five feet thick and this representing all the proof that Gary and old dropped on the floor in court and nobody wants to read it. Then how the hell could they say there's no evidence? Because it doesn't exist. Because they make believe they don't see it. That's right. That's like people saying, what, you saw a UFO, a green cylindrical or cigar-shaped thing hovering in the sky, I don't see it. Well, hey. And then you take a video with your smartphone and you go, look. Yeah, but we have something called science. And in science, you have to prove things. Double blind placebo study. And yes, they used a double blind placebo study. They didn't use it for Bicast. And nutrient, huh? They didn't use it for Bicast. They've used it for many nutritional supplementate. Yes, they do for that. But I'm saying regular official medicine has not used that gold standard for a lot of their treatments. And yet their treatments are in effect. And bypass is one of them. What about companies like Merck? Tonsillitis, the tonsils out, is that okay? What about companies like Merck getting hit with lawsuits, recalling prescription drugs at the FDA, okayed. Well, right now, if you're watching television in the afternoon, you're seeing lawyers telling you if you took Zarelto to call them up right away and if you had a bleeding episode. And guess what? Zarelto is still being advertised by the big drug company. Hey, there's a psychiatric drug given to children that causes a voice to grow breasts. Gyneomastia, yeah, and it's a law firm, a medical malpractice or personal injury or whatever it how they are. At night, there's loads of these law firm commercials. They say, if you took this and you had these symptoms, now the IUD, Morena IUD, intrauterine device, has a tendency to get embedded in the woman's uterus. So it's another lawsuit going on. New York Times columnist, Frank Brunei, called Oz a carnival barker. Oh, he's calling him a snake oil salesman, a carny. And a one-man morality play about the temptations of mammon and the seduction of applause. Launched in 2009, the Dr. Oz show has often been criticized for mixing rigorous and dubious science. Oz sees his show as a forum for discussing many health practices, excuse me, to better inform his viewers. And he wondered what accounted for the timing of last week's letter. He said, it is his opposition to legislation that would strip government agencies of their ability to label genetically modified foods. Now, if you want to continue with a little bit more on Dr. Oz, I have a little bit more, but, I mean, I think that sort of sums it up, no? Well, I mean. Not now, not now. But would it add some information to the Dr. Oz? I think, according to my reading of it, I think it is more, they are trying to limit his defense. They're saying things like the PR firms or something. Oh, if he gets so defensive, and he defends himself and everything, he's going to do harm to his case.  They want him to fold like a cheap camera. Camera, now you're talking. Like a coward. So maybe this might add a little, you know. Yeah, okay. Little more nuance. They want to basically take away his constitutional rights to defend himself and to speak openly, freely, and honestly while he's under oath. Exactly. So it's like a root core, right? Well, he ain't under no oath. It's 10 mysterious doctors, quackbusters, who are trying to get at him. That's all. Is Oz by himself in this hearing? There's no hearing. They're just trying to bust us. It's a letter that the quackbusters sent to Columbia University saying, hey, fire Dr. Oz. We don't like what he's saying. That's all it is. Well, I blame the dean or... Well, he defended him. He said he has a right. To his freedom of speech.  But the quackbusters have power and influence and they work behind the scenes. So you never know. Who runs Columbia University? Not the quackbusters, right? No, whatever money they get. That's who runs the university. Okay. It's kind of like a two-party system politician running for president in 2016 with big campaign contributions. Yeah, and whoever gives him the most, they pull his strings. Gotcha. That's the way America works.  Yeah. Yeah. Hey. But it is until change occurs our economics. The money... And that's the problem. The money is still in politics. Yeah. It's like... And even when religious nuts try to interfere in politics nobody calls them out. Nobody reprimands them. They let them... Or you'll see what happened when the IRS tried to control that situation. They should make them pay taxes if they interfere with politics. Yeah, but that's the point. Remember you said before we went on the air, I said if nobody checks and balances, if nobody oversees any laws or any things that you want are worthless because nobody's gonna hold anybody's feet to the fire. Nobody's being held accountable. That's correct. At all. And that's the situation we have. There are no, you know... I mean... People can back up anything. GW Bush and the demon Dick Cheney, they got away with... Yes, the SEC didn't do a damn thing to Wall Street during Bush's administration. They got away with war crimes, right? That too? Corruption. Now who's going to? The court at the Hague tried. Spain tried. Obama pardoned. Obama pardoned, well he pardoned it, but they shut it down.  But if the shoe was on the other foot, the Republicans would have went after the Democrat. Of course. Like they're going after him... Of course. They're going after Obama simply because he's the black man in the White House. Mitch McConnell said that from when he was elected. Not because... We haven't gotten it yet. Not because of Obama's track record or... Yeah, his socialism. His socialism. Obama's socialism. Hey, all I know is, if a socialist regime does a hell of a lot for the little guy... As it would. As it would, more power to them. There you go. That's how I look at it. What? Socialists and the Communists have been painted with the red scare brush. Ah! The Solidarianism! Ah, these are imbeciles who... Who run the country. Who do not know the definition of these political terms. That's correct.  You know, most Americans, the average American was asked a question and the average American, and these are the people that supposedly vote. They think, they actually think that the sun revolves around the earth. Oh, jeez, they did that back in the Middle Ages for granted. So that means the earth is like the center of the universe. No evolution. And nobody else counts. No evolution means... These people, these are people that believe they question random... There's an organization in the UK that believes their earth is flat. Say what? Huh? Yes! They might as well join the martial Apple White Heavens Gate people. Well, they're dead. They're dead, but somebody's keeping the website alive. I don't know who's paying their server. Anyway, let's break for lunch. Yes! And you'll be joined by the Bible verse truths, the Bible truths of how to defeat a conservative and please feel free to pause, hit the pause button and study them. Followed by our voiceover artist, William H. Moro III with his words of wisdom and promo. William Hamilton Moro, the toyed, the toyed. Where's the second? His dad. His grandfather was the first. Ah, okay. Well, there is no first. Oh, wait a minute. There was no second. Somebody explain to me, there technically is William Hamilton Moro. Then there's William Hamilton Moro Jr. And then if there's another one, then he's the third. Ah, maybe. That's how you're supposed to say it. Maybe that's how they do it. All right, we'll catch you later. I'm the first. Well, you're the only... I'm not the first within my whole clan. No, I'm talking about your family. Are you the first William Joseph Eisen... John. What? John. Your middle name is John? Joseph.  I never said a word of Joseph. You keep on changing your mind about everything. You know... Is it John? You and Tal will better get together. Well, don't say Joseph next week.  Okay, it's John. Yeah. Like John the Baptist. It's not Lily White, like Edward Lily White Norton. No, no, it's... From the Honey of Honeymooners, Lily White. John. Lily White. All right, we'll see you. John the Baptist. Yeah. Wake up, people. Because the truth is often, very often, a very, very hard pill to swallow. This is William H. Morrow. The best way to join our organization is to get your free annual subscription to Newsletter Censored with your gift to support this work. The newsletter of hard-hitting truth and news fighting censorship and conservative propaganda since 1977. There is nothing out there like the Newsletter Censored in the mainstream media or the press. This newsletter is the very best way to join and be a part of our organization. We're living the end times, so you need Newsletter Censored. Go to www.newslettercensored.com. For Hitting Truth, you need Newsletter Censored. And now, back on the show, bye-bye. Okay, we are back. Thank you very much, William Hamilton Morrow, the third for your words of wisdom and promo. Now we return for the balance of this week's show, Uncensored, Hard-Hitting Truth. Continuing with Dr. Oz, the problem he has is that the letter was not an isolated incident. Said Stephen Fink, President of Lexicon Communications of Los Angeles, specializing in crisis communication. The best thing he can do is muster the facts and see if they do lend credence to his side of the story. The louder he criticizes his critics, the more likely he will lose the bully pulpit he has built over the years. So you see what he's saying? If he defends himself too much, he's gonna lose it. But these crackbusters are blatant liars. They're whores for big pharma. And they are insatiable. They've been around for years, okay? They must be exposed. And you can beat them. Like Gary Knowles beat them in court and they still come back. They're like ants in the springtime or catarochies, you know? In your house. They keep coming and coming. What about saying, I thought I dealt with you scoundrels before? Why should I pay attention to your letter again? You know? I will file it under G for Gabbage. What happens with a lot of the, like let's say, you have a problem with a drug and you sue the pharma, it's a suitable company. And then they settle with you and you have to sign it, a non-disclosure agreement which says you will not talk about the case. Well, they better pay me, if it is me, a lot of money. They better make it worth my while for me to keep my mouth shut. That is what has happened because several of the pharmaceuticals companies have ensued many, many, many times and you don't hear about it. And the reason why, and I guess the result of not hearing about it, is that you have a population of people who put so much unnecessary trust and faith in drugs. Yes, they don't lose any of their goodwill and goodness, they lose none of that. Yeah, their reputation is not tainted. Reputation, that's what I wanted to say, yes. The reputation of big pharma is not tainted because all these losses are never brought to public. Correct. Oz's publicists did not return a request for comment on Friday. A Columbia spokesman defended Oz this week saying the school is committed to the principle of academic freedom. The latest backlash follows a meteoric rise in fame. A Harvard graduate who earned both a medical and business degree at the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Oz became a respected cardiologist at New York Presbyterian and a professor of surgery at Columbia University. The man has credentials. Yeah, he's got awesome credentials. For years he lived a rather quiet life in Cliffside Park with his wife, Lisa, and four children. His first bit of fame came in 1996 when he successfully transplanted a heart into Frank Torrey, Joseph Torrey's brother. I didn't know that he did it. He did the surgery, I remember that. While the team was batting for its first world series title in 18 years, speaking of that, according to yesterday, I think, before their game with the Mets, their subway series, the Mets were 11th Street. That's when the Mets had Mike Piazza. No, now. Oh, now? Oh, they are 11th Street? 11th Street. Now they played the Yankees. They were playing a three game subway series. So I don't know if they lost or won at that game, but they were 11th Street before that. I'm a Red Sox fan, anyway. Oz became an overnight hit. He made appearances at hospital news conferences. He went to Yankee Stadium for a life photo shoot. Two years later, he wrote Healing from the Heart, a book that suggested combining Western medicine with everything from acupuncture and hypnosis to aromatherapy and energy healing. See why they're after him? Well, see, I had a problem with Oz when he did a show about anti-aging. And the only thing he really said was... Calorie restricting. No, well, he said, I recommend Botox injections. That's crazy. You know, he didn't talk about antioxidants. He didn't talk about anything like that, supplementation in terms of antioxidants or X-Core. He just talked about Botox injections. No, that's not anti-aging. That's just plastic surgery. Yeah, that's just a superficial cosmetic treatment. The book received some backlash in the medical community for supporting techniques that had no scientific backing. Right. Now, there are thousands and thousands of studies on acupuncture.  But yet, you just saw it. They got away with it. Acupuncture is thousands of years old.   Drug-pushing. Drug-pushing stooges. Stooges.   Soon, Dr. Oz had a show, second opinion on the Discovery Channel, where he dispensed advice mostly to celebrities like Magic Johnson and Charlie Sheen. Charlie Sheen. Dr. Oz got an even bigger platform when he became a regular on the Oprah Winfrey Show. Yeah, anybody who Oprah takes a liking to gets their own show. A doctor. Dr. Phil, you know. Who could explain heart disease and preventive medicine in eloquent soundbites. Some colleagues credited him with bringing sound medical advice to the masses. Others thought he advocated too much for treatments, supplements, and food, whose health benefits were at best unknown. It's not, they're not unknown. It's just that they don't like the established healthcare industry and their lobbyists and their cronies. They don't like people to maintain optimum health and quality longevity, because then you don't become a customer of their big pharma healthcare system. Winfrey began calling him America's doctor. Yeah, yeah, I would say so, yeah. And in 2009, Dr. Oz had his own daytime syndicated show, which now reaches two million viewers each weekday. All right, that's it, two million? Yeah, that's it. He's a daytime show. Is it on cable? Must be on cable, only two million. No, it's, he's on a major network. Yeah? Yeah. Well, two million is very low then. The show has often been criticized for mixing rigorous and dubious science. Dr. Oz said in his time essay that although he advocates alternative measures, he believes they should complement conventional treatment. Why? Not replace them. He said his opposition to legislation that would strip government agencies of their ability to label genetically modified foods is the primary reason he has been criticized. Oz tried to link some of the doctors with groups and companies that are against labeling genetically modified food. A practice that makes fruits and vegetables impervious to higher doses of herbicides when growing. Michael Cherinsen, executive vice president of parasympany-based success communications said, Oz is fighting so vigorously because his livelihood may be in jeopardy. But he said it should have never gotten to this point. Any time you speak in exclamation points, you open yourself up for a tag. Boy, I would be like a target practice then. I'm loaded with exclamation points. If Oz had the consumer's interest at heart, he should be willing to give a full, open, honest debate about this. So should his accusers, which will never happen. If neither party is willing to do that, I think it speaks volumes to their true motives. They're gonna happen. No, they do not debate. Unless they can control the form and control the debate. Then they will debate. Yeah. Well, I meant the cat trying to stare me down over here. Governor Christie's wife, Mary Patton, resigned as the top finance executive on Wall Street. Oh really? That's where she worked? And this is the latest sign that the Christie's are preparing to run for president. Mary Patt Christie was a managing director at Angelo Gordon and Company, an alternative investment firm with $27 billion in assets under management before joining the firm in 2012, 2012 is a significant date. She worked as a bond trader and vice president at the investment bank at Cantor Fitzgerald. She's also known as a crucial political advisor and fundraiser helping to guide her husband's career. Mrs. Christie has decided to take a hiatus from her work in the finance world to spend more time with her family and young children. The resignation came in the same week that Governor Christie extended his timeline for announcing whether he will seek the presidency appearing on The Tonight Show on Wednesday. Christie told host Jimmy Fallon that the big reveal would come this month or next. Boy, people like him should get FaceTime The Tonight Show. He had said before that the decision would come early this year. In the meantime, political operatives close to Christie are fanning out to key presidential primary states and a group of influential donors aligned with the New Jersey governor has formed a political action committee. Leadership matters for America. Leadership matters for rich America. That's the only segment that will be helped by Chris Christie. Your family is unbelievably affected by this Governor Christie said last year. Their lives will never be the same. And so we're thinking about it. I think it's good for me, good for my family, good for our state and country. Nothing good about it having him in office. As recently as last week, the governor's wife said she was unsure what to do about her job if the governor jumped into the 2016 race. She told NBC it would be difficult to leave Wall Street. At Angelo Gordon, her work focused on strategic planning and marketing for distressed assets and bank debt. I do have a great job, she said. I'm not sure what I'm going to do with regards to that. But I know I want to spend a lot of time with my family. Of the four Christie children, the two eldest are college students. Andrew attends Princeton University and Sarah goes to the University of Notre Dame. Is Andrew obese? I wonder. I don't know. The new arrangement also frees up Mary Pat Christie's time to travel with the governor as he hits presidential primary states. She was with him at the Rope Lines in New Hampshire last week. But it will likely come at a cost. According to the Christie's, 2013, a tax return, she earned $510,552 with Governor Christie's $475,850. Oh, wait, excuse me. That's what came from Angelo Gordon for her. And $34,698 coming from Cantor Fitzgerald. The governor's salary is $175,000. The Christie's have requested an extension to file their 2014 tax returns as they do every year. Christie raised eyebrows. When he told a New Hampshire crowd that Andrews and Sarah's college tuition bills add up to $120,000. No college education is worth that. Especially with this economy. No, it's not. It's not, I'm sorry. A year. They use, a lot of schools have outdated textbooks. Which you have to pay for. Which you have to pay for, yeah. I don't consider myself a wealthy man, Mr. Christie said. Well, it's relative.  Chris and Mary Pat have been a team since they served in student government together at the University of Delaware in the 1980s. While he pursued a career in public office. First as Morris County freeholder, then as a U.S. attorney, and now as governor. She became the family's main breadwinner. A prolific fundraiser for her husband. And one of his closest political confidants. Along with his brother, excuse me, Todd Christie. Oh, there's more. We don't hear much about him. She is a co-equal branch of the enterprise. Said State Senator Joe Krillos, a close friend of the Christie's. She has an incredible career and has had it for 30 years now. Today, last week. So yeah, resigning would be a big sacrifice to ask from her. And it wouldn't be a requirement from my perspective. It's got to be about our lives. Poor thing. Oh, the Christie's. Aside from her day job. She also has kept busy as first lady over the years. After Superstorms, Standy, Battered New Jersey, she started Spass, Sandy, Sandy. She started the Hurricane Sandy New Jersey Relief Fund. Yeah, where happened to the money? Which had awarded $37.2 million in grants to housing assistance groups as of October. Oh, really? Well, why are all these people complaining? They have no money. They didn't get the money? Yeah. So yeah, wonder where the money went. Subsidies for his rich buddies. Well, look who's running the program. Her. Her. Oh, God. It's not complicated to see the pattern with Republicans. Just follow the money. Follow the money trail. You got it, buddy boy. Yeah. I read that while human life expectancy has increased, human lifespan remains the same. If so, how can scientists account for the rising age of the oldest living humans since 1800 from about 100 years old to over 120 most recently? And look at the quality of life too. That's more important. Are you suffering? Are you decrepit?  The outer limits of the human lifespan are genetic, but increased life expectancy, the oldest age in that lifespan that we're likely to reach is due to better nutrition, modern medicine, and other environmental non-born, non-inborn factors. If the age of the oldest living humans has risen, it's because some genetic groups may have slightly longer lifespans than others, and they are benefiting from those same factors. And nutrition plays a huge role. Huge! And in the lifespan, elongating nowadays, yeah. Telomers. Telomers, the length of your telomers, you know. There are supplements for that. You got one last one, right? You want it to be last? Well. Maybe I better pick a smaller or a shorter one because this is- What's that one? This is about the pesticides, that harming our wild bees. You know what? Let's do that. Yeah, this is important, and then we'll call it a- Call it a day. Call it a week, a day. That's right, a week. A common type of pesticide is dramatically harming wild bees. According to a new study, that outside experts say, may help shift the way the US government looks at controversial class of chemicals. But in the study published Wednesday, in the journal Nature, Honey Bees, which get trucked from place to place to pollinate major crops like almonds, did not show the significant ill effects that more efficient, wild pollinators like bumblebees did. A finding some experts found surprising. This reminds me of a video I saw yesterday on Facebook where these buffalo or bison had gotten out of a pen or something of that nature and they were blocking the road. And you know how they were gonna handle the problem?   That's right.  Oh, these right wing gun nuts, they trigger happy. I guess they love to shoot at anything. And that's the solution to all problems. Kill them. Anyway, the second study published in the same journal showed that in lab tests, bees don't avoid these harmful pesticides. They may actually seek them out and get addicted to them, making the problem worse. I wonder why. Bees of all kinds, crucial to pollinating plants, including major agriculture crops, have been in decline for several reasons. Pesticides are just one of many problems. This is separate from the colony collapse disorder, which devastated honeybee populations in recent years. But it's now abating. The study found that exposure to neonicotinoid, neonicotinoid septicides reduced the density of wild bees and resulted in less reproduction. And colonies did not grow when compared to bees not exposed to the pesticide. When the first results came in, I was quite, oh my God! She said that study leader Arthur Mac, I guess it's major, major run-off of Lund University in Sweden. She said the reduction in bee health was much more dramatic than I ever expected. University of Illinois entomologist May Berenbaum, who wasn't part of either study and last year was awarded the National Medal of Science, said that the studies indicate that at least with current technology, systemic use of pesticides is fraught with environmental problems. No kidding. The European Union has a moratorium on the use of neonicotinoid environmentalists are pushing for the same in the United States. Run-Loft conducted her study just before the European ban went into effect in 2013. This paper has the potential of really shifting the conversation, said University of Maryland entomologist Dennis Van Engelstorp, who was not part of the study. Neonics may have a very dramatic effect on these non-managed pollinators in the environment. This is the most definitive work I have seen in the area. Bee scientist Jeff Pettis of the U.S. Department of Agriculture said the Run-Loft study finds the pesticide is a real problem for wild bees and it does it under real-world, well-replicated conditions while using realistic doses. Environmental activists groups are using the study to step up pressure on the U.S. government to ban the pesticide. Laurie Ann Byrd, environmental health director at the Center for Biological Diversity said federal agencies must step up and take action to ban these dangerous chemicals before it is too late to save our wild being. Without our pollinators, the world will only have enough food for a short amount of time. We will stop. A very short amount of time. Yes, yes, yes. I'm not positive as to the exact time because I've heard different bits of information but it won't be a long time. We will quickly run out of food. Like maybe a year. Because whatever's in the ground will probably last a year, you know? Yeah. Yeah, I mean, pollination is predominantly done by bees but pollen does get around in other ways. Blows, insects on your feet, their body, whatever. Butterflies, could be birds, it could be the wind. Many things. Anyway, thank you for joining us for Uncensored Heart-Hitting Truth. We'll see you next time and next time might be, would it be May? Next Saturday, would it be May? Yes, it would. So what you're saying is this is the last show of April, 2015. I think Thursday's the last day of April. This Thursday would be the last day. All right, so we'll see you in the merry month of May. May flowers, man, May flowers. Sink of the Mayo. Sink of the Mayo. All you can eat. Enchiladas, quesadillas, and such, tamales. Sounds good to me. Frozen margaritas too. All right. Hey, boy. Yeah, boy, boy. We'll see you. Have a good week, people. Bye-bye. This has been Omega Life 21 production.