Hi, I'm Bryson Bort and thank you for joining us today with the election security panel with the fence. This is a really romantic occasion, bringing this many federal agencies all together on one hand. The timing is perfect. There is a huge election coming up here in the United States in 2020. There are elections happening around the world and I think that's a key thing for us to understand is that while this panel is talking about the U.S. federal government, how we are responding to our American election, when we look at the broader forces that are aligned against democracy in the world, that all comes down to trust in the system for the democracy to work. And those forces are working against places more than the U.S. and so while this is going to be the U.S. government discussing this, I think citizens all over the world and hackers all over the world will be able to take something away from that. Just quick logistics, Q&A will be available through the DEF CON Discord. So if you put your questions in the voting village DEF CON Discord, those will make it their way up here to me on the stage and we will answer them as best as we can. Starting off, we have Cynthia Kaiser. Hello, I'm Cynthia Kaiser, I'm an assistant section chief with the FBI Cyber Division. And what that really means is I lead analysis among multiple threat groups for the FBI that includes election threats, mostly in the cyber arena. And that's by design. I saw what happened in 2016 and I knew that there was nowhere else I wanted to be and then working this threat as we came into 2020 and I'm really excited to be here with people that I get to see all the time I've been doing. So for the FBI and the election space, a good way to think about it is we're really focused on the threat. So we work hand in hand with our DHS counterparts and they're really focused on the risk to the systems, the remediation on those systems. But when it comes to the threat response of incidents or looking at investigations into malign foreign influence or investigations into election crimes like ballot fraud, that's where the FBI really plays into space. David Bordino from the National Security Agency. It's great to be with you here today. I'm an NSA election security lead. Most of you are familiar with NSA's mission, really divided up into two components, our foreign signals intelligence mission, which is all about figuring out what the adversaries are up to. And then we have the cyber security component, which is all about preventing and eradicating threats to national security systems and figuring out how we can protect DOD networks in the light. Really a lot of power from NSA comes with combining those missions, knowing what the threat is and combining that with the technical analysis and mitigations in order for us to be able to deploy those into unclassified space. From the election security standpoint, I oversee all the activities and partnerships that NSA has on election security. I also co-lead something called the election security group, along with Richard Hartman here, which we'll get into extra on the panel. And that's a joint NSA cyber command task force for protecting the elections. A little bit about me, I grew up in Chicago, that's what I'm representing here at the Miski Park, sure, no white socks. And I'm also into craft cocktails. I supplied a typical DEF CON tradition, a cocktail of Black Manhattan for everybody. And I'd like to give a shout out to Johnny and Carl for hosting me at cocktailcon this Tuesday. Really great event and a community in terms of getting the InfoSec community together. Talk about cocktails, talk about security. So I appreciate it and I appreciate the DEF CON folks for having us here today. Hey, I'm Joe Hartman. I command the Cyber National Mission Force, so part of US Cyber Command. As Dave said, I co-lead the election security group with him. And the election security group is really partnered with all the agencies you see represented here and others in defense of the 2020 election. We're the part of the US government that focuses on the away game. So we are looking at foreign adversaries, Russia, China, Iran, any other foreign adversaries who's attempting to interfere with our elections. We're looking for them in foreign space and we're partnering with DHS and FBI in order to ensure that we share information that we find abroad that makes us safer here in the United States. Really glad to be here today and look forward to your questions. My name is Maurice Turner. I'm Senior Advisor for the Executive Director at the US Election Assistance Commission. We're a relatively small agency compared to the ones you've heard from earlier today. But our mission is focused. We help make sure that Americans all across the country and all across the world have the ability to participate in elections, whether they're going to be in any one of the 50 states, six territories, or stationed overseas. So our focus is really how do we make sure that those voters have access to the polls and that they can vote safely, securely, and make sure that they're both counts. And I'm Matt Masterson. I'm the designated survivor that was held back from the federal panel. So if anything happens, we can maintain federal continuity of operations on election security. I'm in a secret skiff out in the Midwest somewhere. Appreciate the voting village for inviting me and the feds to participate. So thankful to Bryson for organizing. And I know we're going to address the question of what's the greatest area of progress since 2016? Where have we improved? I mean, the fact that you have a unified federal effort working to help support state and local election officials on this mission space, I think speaks volumes. I work for the Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA. I'm the election security lead there. Prior to that, I was a commissioner at the EAC where Maurice now sits. And before that, I was an election official in the state of Ohio. So come from an election administration background, have had to learn the intricacies of both CISA and the IC. And I'm so thankful to everyone sitting up on that stage for their patience with me and working with me and CISA to make sure we're supporting the almost 8,800 state and local election officials across this country, let alone the private sector that we work very closely with and members of academia and nonpartisan organization. Our focus at CISA is to get information, support services, everything from penetration testing to routine cyber hygiene scans, the incident response out to the state and local election officials to help support them and engaging with their voters. The reality is American elections are run at the state and local level. And we want to do everything we can so that those state and local officials can talk to their voters about why the process is secure and why they should have confidence that their vote was counted as cast. So really thankful for this panel and super excited to have this discussion today. Matt, that's a great segue. Trust is key to the infrastructure, right? The process for collecting the votes to determine our democracy starts with that trust and that begins with transparency and accountability. Which is why I thought it was so critical to have this panel here for the government to talk about, okay, what's happened and what have we done? So 2016 is when I think this really grew into the consciousness as a significant issue that everybody understood. What exactly happened in 2016 and 2018? Well, on the cyber side, in 2016, Russia compromised multiple different election networks that included a state network that included two counties. And as a part of that, we've assessed that they really sought to at least conduct reconnaissance against all 50 states to try to figure out where was most vulnerable and where they could get in. Now, we don't think they've had any effect on election. We have no information that they did and really where they were focused on, really couldn't have. But within that, it's obviously troubling because that's an attack on our election system since attacking critical infrastructure. And it's something that now looking at that and moving forward, that's why we partnered with everybody here to focus on how do we aid hardening networks so that can't happen and how do we work to counter adversaries so they don't want to do it and how do we ensure that we can be as transparent as possible. And that's included some various measures like both FBI and CISA will now tell a chief state election official if anything happens on a local election network. That's a change from 2016. And it's a necessary change for the transparency that you noted. I mean, I think Cynthia covered the cyber side pretty well from that one side. I think most folks are tracking the infamous Internet Research Agency control farm. So in terms of the social media operations that they were conducting in 2016 and 2018, also hack and leak operations that are always could be very damaging when we look at in terms of kind of evolution between 2016, 2018 and 2020, it was mostly focused on Russia in 2016. But the threat is broader than that. It's for 2020 we're looking at the spectrum of all of our adversaries, Russia, China, Iran, ransomware actors. There's more people in the game and they're learning from each other influences, chief game to get into now with social media. It doesn't cost a lot of money. You can try to wander your narratives online through different media outlets. So that's something we're laser focused on for 2020 as well. Yeah, Bryce, I think for us, you know, in 2016, election security really wasn't a priority mission for the Department of Defense. It just wasn't something that we had previously focused on, heavily involved in other operations. And so while we were focused on other operations, the Russians obviously focused on our elections. We learned from that in 2018 between Cybercom and NSA, we formed what was called the Russia Small Group, really laser focused on Russian interference in the 2018 election. You know, and for us, that never stopped. And so, you know, I got back to the command about a year ago of 2019 and we didn't start up, you know, this thing called the election security group that was already working. And it never stopped working from 2018. And we think we're in a much better position now, certainly than we were in 2016 or 2018. The big change from 2016 to 2018 and now in 2020 really started with the critical infrastructure designation that allowed all these federal partners to come together in a way that we'd be able to better protect our election infrastructure. And I think that that really is the key to all of this, which is information sharing, making sure that information is shared amongst agencies, but also to the state and local partners as well. The folks are actually running their own networks, their own infrastructure. And so that's where EAC comes in. We have relationships, we're building those relationships with the state and locals to make sure that they understand the information that's coming to them from their federal partners and that they realize that they're part of the solution to, you know, feeling information up to the federal partners is how this all works. It's not just keeping those information notices in a silo and keeping them at the local level. It's a sharing up and down this fact to make sure that the infrastructure is protected because it may not just be an attack that happens on a single state or a single county. That might be happening other places. And if we're not sharing information, then the partners don't know that that coordination is going on. Yeah, just to build off on what some of the other panelists have said, for me, the biggest change has really been that level of coordination and support with state and local election officials. As many people know, when the critical infrastructure designation was made in 2017, there's a lot of resistance, understandably, from state and local election officials and skepticism.  We're deploying Albert sensors. We sit here now on the brink of 2020. We not only have Albert sensors, so intrusion detection sensors deployed across networks in all 50 states. We have an ISAC and Information Sharing and Analysis Center with close to 3,000 state and local partners receiving information, pushing information back to us. We're now deploying endpoint protection in many of the states and across localities to have additional insight. But really that ability to coordinate across the federal government and push information back down to the state and locals has improved so much. The federal government I think is working in a way around election threat information that I don't know that it did around other issues. We are able now to take information and state and locals are sharing all kinds of reporting with us and push it across the interagency, the folks that you see sitting up on the stage here, and then push out alerts and warnings through the ISAC broadly to the community. And that's just a function that wasn't there certainly in 2016 and is really being honed and improved upon from 2018 to 2020 and that broad reach. And so that ability to really work with the election officials to understand risk, our risk understanding is much deeper than it was 2016 or 2018 to the point where as COVID has developed and kind of changed operations within elections offices, we've been able to be responsive and understand where the risk is shifting and try to help gear our support, our information sharing to understand that risk shift so that they can take appropriate steps to mitigate that risk and really ensure the integrity of the election and then turn around and message it to voters. And I think that's a theme you're going to hear throughout this conversation, really reaching that last step of talking to voters about their options, about how they can vote, about the process and securities. Really critical in an environment when we know adversaries are trying to undermine competence in the process. So part of what we've learned, which stems from the problem and a lot of what the solution has been, has been the designation of this as critical infrastructure, the federal collaboration.  You all know each other pretty well, right? I was talking to Bryson earlier that I've been on panels before with people from the government who are all working the same issue and then you're meeting the person right before the panel starts. So when Bryson reached out and said, we're going to have a ban on election security and I asked, okay, who's going to be on it? And he started to tick it off names. And I'm like, okay, I talk to these people multiple times per week or sometimes every single day or multiple times a day. So it really just shows like how deep the collaboration is. I spent a lot of time in counterterrorism. You think that's a mission that, and it is a mission that the government rallies around but election security, I get exploded out of the water in terms of how much we all talk to each other. Right, I mean, there's no better example that this panel is a representation of what's already happening. This panel is not the thing that is driving it, right? We are capturing a moment in time of what's been accomplished. If we had tried to do this in 2016, we would have been spending the last 30 minutes all shaking each other. I'm like, oh, we're using it. What do you do? I think I've, what exactly is that? Tell us about the Midwest, Matt. Like, we've never heard of these things.  But the fact that the information is being shared so that missions are being executed. Things are happening with it, right? Those risks are being assessed. Those actions are being taken. And that is, I really like the way you phrased the show, right? We're playing the away game. I'll translate that for everybody. No, actually, why don't you translate with the away game? Yeah, so let me translate the away game at the end. I mean, if I could just talk about the collaboration and the relationships. And a good example is like the rehearsal that we did on Super Tuesday. And so look, I'm in the Army. I've been in the Army a long time, just like Dave. I spend a lot of time in the CT fight and a lot of times in panel rooms and places like Afghanistan. And we operate out of these joint operation centers, right? And in the joint operation centers, we're sitting in there. As you can imagine, we love flat screen TVs. A lot of flat screen TVs on the wall. And unmanned aerial vehicles are flying around in other collection assets. All that data is being pumped into the room where you're immediately able to make sense of it and then make decisions, allocate resources, sending forces, doing what? And Super Tuesday, if you walked into the room that we were using as a mission center, you would have seen Syracom personnel. You would have seen NSA personnel. And you would have looked in a chat room and almost every organization that you could imagine involved in the federal government is in a chat room. Okay, and they are talking about in almost real time, if something goes on on state election infrastructure in North Carolina, there is an unclassified chat going up to DHS who drops it in a classified chat room. You've got analysts from NSA and Syracom and other government agencies immediately co-ing their databases and then almost instantaneously providing information back that says, hey, this is something you should be concerned about or this is just normal traffic that we see on any day on the internet. It looks anomalous because we're paying a lot more attention to it right now because there's a distinct on Super Tuesday going on. At the same time, I've got defensive cyber elements that are sitting in things we call war rooms and they are waiting on a call. If there is something that happens that DHS needs help with, they are trained. They have collaborated in the past and we're ready to kick out a team out. Additionally, we have elements that are sitting over in other ops centers and they are prepared if we see an adversary that's attempting to do something in a field with that election, we have the ability to play the away game. And so we have the ability to go out in foreign space, look at what you're doing and we have the ability to make yourself feel good. And that's really the focus of what I think the federal government looks like from the local and state level all the way up through the national level to the Department of Defense. And for me as American, honestly, that was a pretty impressive experience. Take a slight turn from that. I think it is important to call out the collaboration that we have in the government but I think the other evolution that's occurred is the engagement with industry here, right? I'm sure we have a lot of people who are working for the federal government down in here and I think that's been a major component of the shift in posture. We have for election security, I mean, it's awesome when you're reading about disinformation networks being pulled out and social media companies, obviously the cybersecurity companies really focus on election threats and trying to hunt down adversaries and what they're up to. We can't do this mission without them and without industry help from state local office collection officials but also the cybersecurity companies and how we can feed off each other. We learn from what industry is putting out and hopefully we're providing value at and what we're putting out so people can leverage that in the systems and insights they have, right? Industry has a lot better insights than the government does in a lot of these cases. So they're a critical partner in this morning for sure. And I think that taking that a step further even that individual level collaboration, you know, not just a big corporate or a company collaboration with the federal government but people who call in suspicious information because they're worried about it and they call DHS, they call FBI, they call any of us and they are calling because they're worried and they want to do the right thing. And because those people call, the majority of the information that really we're able to get to state and locals since 2016, it's been because people called us, they've said they were concerned about something, we looked at it and we said, you're right. And we got it out to everybody. So there's this element of that corporate industry responsibility and collaboration. There's a federal government collaboration but there's that individual collaboration too with all of us that it really is working well together. Yep, Bryson, if I can just really quick on that. I think Cynthia raises a really good point that it's appropriate here. Just the fact that there's now a guide for coordinated vulnerability disclosure for state and local election officials. In 2016, as a member of the election community, I could tell you that was not a known commodity or something that they were even considering. And now we're progressed where folks like Jack Cable, who I know was on before, have built relationships with election officials, helped them understand the value of vulnerability disclosure and working with independent researchers and security experts in that way. The fact that private industry within the elections community is rolling out vulnerability disclosure policies and engaging in that conversation, not something that was going on in 2016. And so the multiple avenues of information, the multiple avenues of collaboration are really encouraging. I think we have a lot of ways to go. I think there's lots of room for improvement, certainly on the federal side to help coordinate on that. At the state and local level increasing capacity, the ability to intake and resolve and mitigate those vulnerabilities. But it's a drastic improvement from where we were even four years ago and really speaks to the professionalism of state and local election officials in particular who care deeply about the security of this process and their systems and want to find ways to improve and talk to their voters about the steps they've taken to secure it. Yeah, this industry and this community has really matured very quickly compared to some others. And I think it's a part due to events like this, like DEF CON where researchers are coming together talking about what's going on, where are their vulnerabilities, what are some ways we can fix it, taking a look at other industries like telecoms, aviation, things like that and getting those best practices out of the way kind of quickly. And as Matt was saying, it's because individuals care. And I think that that's probably the biggest part of this that I want people to take away from this is that elections happen in communities. I think that's really what it comes down to is everyone gets a sense of how important it is at the very local level. And all that builds up to build a sense of national urgency and importance about the issue. And to see the election officials really, get on board with this idea that they are part of the defense network to make sure that we don't have interference playing in our elections and to see them get educated on the issues and really try to convey their own sense of confidence in their systems because they know what goes into running an election. It's not all just about cybersecurity. There are administrative tasks they need to do. There are other tasks that some of them are even responsible for. And so they care deeply about elections. They wanna make sure that everyone who votes has a level of confidence that they can feel when they go into the polling place or when they mail in their ballot. So follow up questions to Maurice and to Matt. This follows from a question from Neil McFernan. And it is, we're talking to a very unique audience today, right? They are citizens of the world. They're American citizens, but they're hackers, right? This is the new system of the internet that's there to figure out what works best. And here's the thing. They're doing it today in the voting village. They're doing it on the technology. We talked about industry involvement. We have individuals willing to take their time to actually dig into the technology itself to understand what works and what doesn't because that gives us better trust in that technical implementation of the system. And so the full question here is, when would we start potentially having a prerequisite for entrance to the BBSG certification process that election system vendors adopt good vulnerability disclosure policies as called out today. So make them widely available for penetration testing. I'll take that since the EAC is in charge of the development and the approval of the BBSG. So those are guidelines that are used by states and it directs the manufacturers to meet certain requirements so that they build their systems in a way that is accessible and secure and usable. And so I think the idea of a vulnerability disclosure policy being part of that would really just be the codification of industry best practices. Now the manufacturers know that they are in competition to help bring a better level of security to these systems that are in use. And so I think that that's already happening. We've seen the fruits of that labor already. It didn't need to come from a federal agency to help the process along. So to answer Neil's question, it's already happening. And so as the industry continues to mature, I think that we'll see more and more vulnerability disclosure policies. And I'm hoping that you folks out there get interested in this sector and actually use them. Find that legal way of doing the research and then reporting it responsibly to make sure that the problems actually get fixed. This isn't about a big bug bounty that you're going after. This isn't about trying to embarrass anyone. This is about strengthening our democracy literally through strengthening our systems. Yeah, Bryson, just to add a little bit, Maurice really tackled the meat of the issue, but I agree. I mean, we have had several vendors, election system vendors come through our penetration testing process, what we call our critical product evaluation process up in Idaho. We have seen the private sector embrace that. Now we're starting to see, I think, the fruits of the work of not just the voting village, but the private sector companies to understand the value. And frankly, the marketplace dictating that improved security steps towards coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes are going to be good for business. And that's why you see a reflection in progress being made. The private sector is hearing from customers, is responding and I think will continue to see progress made on that level. I think one step we need to take, and I know the EAC takes this very seriously, and states need to be thinking about it too, but to the extent it involves equipment, whether you pull books or voting systems that they certify, you have to be ready to respond and adjust certification quickly, adapt to those type of processes. So I think we have a maturing to do sort of in the bureaucratic lane to make sure that we can support the private sector as they're changing and evolving and accepting this approach that we support them in our certification processes and the way that systems need to be fielded. So that all ties back to them. What is the threat? China, Iran, Russia have been mentioned. How are they a threat? What are they doing? And are they the only threat that we need to be worried about? I'll start with that one. I would say those are the main threats we're facing. Again, I think ransomware is like one of those wildcards out there that could be fielded by anyone. I'm theory criminal actors, et cetera. So I would say more to that. So for Russia, I think in terms of public evolution, what we've seen, we talked about the Internet Research Agency, what they did in kind of social media accounts and the troll farms. In terms of 2020, we've seen a shift more towards use of proxies. I guess I should maybe say intermediaries and when we're in a technology crowd instead of saying proxies. So, using, again, I mentioned before, laundering information through other individuals into the media space and the IRA, seeing that shift tactics. They had set up something in Africa I got on in terms of trying to have people there, trying to put stuff online, posting things about socially divisive issues, using covert influence websites to be able to get their narrative out. So that's kind of a shift attack that we've seen from Russia side. China, I think, scale is something that has been unmatched in terms of that. As a threat, both from a cyber standpoint and from an influence standpoint, certainly on influence, they've been very active in their region, Taiwan, Hong Kong. Then becoming potentially more aggressive in the US space is something that we need to monitor and be prepared for. But in cyber, for the China cyber threat, they're a little bit different in terms of the scale and the breadth of the targets they go after. Every US citizen is a target in China just because of the big data, PII that they're interested in collecting. Obviously, everyone's my IP threat, besides just the standard intelligence-type targets. I think that sets that immediately apart. And I ran just getting into the game too, right in terms of them trying to do social media influence and learning from what the other adversaries are doing. Yeah, so Russia, I would offer everyone, you should read the report that came out from the State Department a couple of days ago. 77 pages called Pillars of Disinformation about the various sites operated by Russian. Just ask yourself, why in Russia a country where few people read or write English? Do they continue to put out a tremendous amount of English-language news on these French news outlets? That really involved divisive issues that are US-based. And so, again, a tremendous amount of platforms that the Russians invest in. CNN ran a great news expose in April of 2020 about an organization that Dave referenced. So, 18 trolls in Ghana led by a guy named Seth Wiredu, who grew up in Ghana, educated in Russia, and appears to have been on the payroll of the Progosian Network. So, again, it's about a seven-minute watch. CNN did a fantastic job and that can just provide you some insight in what the Russians are doing there. And then, when we talk about private industry, whether it's Facebook, Google, Microsoft, there are dozens of articles about how these technology companies have identified this malicious behavior on their platforms that they're able to link back to the nation's state adversaries, Russia, China, Iran. So, I would tell everybody that there's a ton of stuff out there. I know when we talk to Cybercom and NSA, we want to focus on that classified cyber box, but I'll tell you there is a tremendous amount of great information already out there on the internet that can provide you a lot of insight. As Cynthia talked about, we, the US government, for you experts that are out there, if you see suspicious activity, tell DHS, tell the FBI, we the government will do something about it. If it's a domestic threat, those organizations will address it. If it's a foreign threat, they'll tell us. And I don't mean they'll tell us like six months from now. They'll tell us that day, they'll tell us early the next morning. We had an incident the other night that occurred at 1.42 in the morning, and about six o'clock in the morning, we had cyber teams looking at the activity. And so, again, for you experts out there, you know better than anybody else if something is weird is going on on the internet. And I would just ask you to share that and the way the government will take action. Yeah, I'd say too, just from a cyber aspect, because I know we're talking about a lot of the hacker community. Leveraging trust relationships, it's common technique, right? So some of these networks that they might be interested in are very well-prevented, just like the DOD, right? But companies sometimes outsource their marketing departments. There's other soft targets out there, I think, takes that could be lucrative, even from an Intel perspective. Think tanks do policy work for politicians. They have contacts with elected officials. So sometimes going outside the bullseye. And again, a lot of this is common techniques exploiting publicly known CVEs, password spraying, spear phishing, you name it. They're using Shodan, they're using Burp Suite. They're using those tools. They can get access to a network that maybe isn't inside the bullseye. Leverage that, leverage an account, leverage a network connection to get into the targets they're going after. And I think that's an important point, but that type of targeting hasn't really stopped from 2069. So spear phishing or looking for those networks that might be connected to the targets that they more desire, that's been continuing pace. And I mean, we're tracking a lot of incidents, even right now. And the good news with all those incidents is we haven't really seen any widespread impacts from those. But it's interesting because tracking a lot of incidents can feel scary, but it also gives me a lot of, it makes me feel better almost because I know that we're detecting every tremor. And that means we have a lot of false positives that we follow up on. I much rather that than not knowing things are out there. But it also means being a fuller picture. And part of that fuller picture, as Dave mentioned, is on cyber criminals and not just ransomware, other types of incidents as well and actors as well. And we really have to be on guard, not just if it's coming from Russia or China or Iran or a host of other groups, but a threat to an election network or a campaign network is a threat. And we need to be able to be really flexible in addressing that and getting in front of that head-on so that we can't make sure that come election day, we're not dealing with a lot of pop-up threats and we're spending a lot of time trying to figure out really what happened. Yeah, I think that access of cyber, the cyber threats and influence threats is a dangerous space. And we know about Hack and Leake and how that can impact potentially the voter populace in their opinions. But we were just talking before this panel, I think, in terms of using influence to make people distrust either electoral outcomes. So you could have a ransomware incident in a local network that actually doesn't even impact like the elections counting or any of that. But someone could then spin an influence campaign when that gets reported to make people think it has had an impact and then not trust the results. So then that's one of those things that I think is worrisome, even if the cyber attack doesn't actually have a measurable impact in terms of the conduct of the election or the voting tallies. But if someone's able to take that and then try to spin off the information operations and have an influence, that's not gonna be the case. That point I'd just like to drive home is that it's not just about what actually happened, where votes actually change. That's incredibly difficult to do at scale in a way that's undetectable. But if you can put that message out there that causes people to question and then their local election official picks up that phone call and they don't have a good response for it, that can be just as damaging. So that's why at EAC we feel so strongly about making sure that local election officials have the tools, have the training that they need. So we partnered with the Center for Tech and Civic Life, to actually provide that basic intermediate level of cyber security training so that they understand why is it important to have two-factor authentication? What does it mean to actually have a password manager so you're not reusing your passwords? These are all basics that most folks that are watching us right now are thinking how can anybody not know how to do that? So they should never have been taught that or if you don't have an understanding of the impact of that, then it might be too much work. But once you understand how much bad stuff that can actually prevent you recognize, it's actually not that difficult. It's actually pretty easy to use it if you are familiar with the tools. And then it gives you the confidence to stand up and say, you know what? Yeah, we heard about the ransomware or maybe we got hit with some ransomware but the town down the street. But we're ready. These are the things that we're doing. For us it's one of the things we're not gonna talk about, but here are some of the big things, the high level things that we're doing to be prepared so that if we do get a phishing email, we know how to spot it. We know how to stop it. We can recover from those backups if we actually do get hit with it. And so I think that's why it's so important that the local election officials have a little confidence that they can then reflect back on to their voters when it comes to elections. Yeah, just real quick on that, Maurice raises some really good points. And it's why we spent a lot of time at CISA on something we call the last mile project. Which is literally a poster project offering both risk assessment and then mitigation advice to the local level, almost 6,000 local jurisdictions, specific to their state and their jurisdiction so that they can not only take the steps whether it's multi-factor authentication or penetration testing or phishing campaign resilience or creating incident response plans which we've really focused on but then can go and talk to their voters and we've seen some cool approaches to this. We saw one state, the state of Iowa take their posters out to the state fair so that they could talk to their voters directly about steps that they were taking. We saw the state of Rhode Island work with their libraries to put it up in the library system so that they could talk to voters through the libraries about this. And in the end, I think Dave raises a really important point. There's resilience to cyber intrusion, resilience and the ability to recover from incidents but then there's the resilience that we need to install in talking to the American voter. We need voters that are prepared, right? That understand their registry, am I registered? What's on my ballot? What are my voting options, particularly amongst COVID so that they can have confidence on how they're going to engage the process? We need a voter that is patient that understands that perhaps election night results won't be as complete as what we're used to in a given jurisdiction and that the accuracy of the vote count is the most important thing regardless of the time it takes. And then we need a voter that participates, that engages. We need 250,000 or more poll workers across this country in preparation for November in the midst of COVID when we have poll workers that are gonna be unwilling to work either because they're age or high-risk nature. And so having people engaged in participating the rally for those folks that are listening and no one told me anyone would be listening to this so now I'm a little worried but anyone that is listening go sign up to be a poll worker if you want to understand the process. Matt Blaze hits this every time and he's exactly right. If you have questions, if you have concerns, if you want to help secure the process, start off by being an election worker, you're not going to get turned down, we need you. And it's the best way to learn where the resiliency exists in the process where improvements can be made in order to get involved. If you can't be a poll worker, if you can't take on that risk, there are opportunities to watch pre-election testing of systems. We run elections at the local level so you can participate directly with those who run the process. So go get your questions answered, go engage with them and see what kind of support they're in need of, in particular, serving as an election worker. It really is the best path to doing this and the best way to learn the process. But if we can have voters, voters are our last line of resiliency as Director Krebs says they're the ones that can really ensure a responsive resilient process when attempts to undermine confidence are there. There is no such thing as a secure system, right?  So quick question from a lot of interested citizens who want to get involved ties to the fact around, okay. So you talk about detection being a key part of that secure system. Where exactly are they supposed to go to figure out where to say something? Well, you can go to your local FBI field office. You can go onto FBI.gov and find out contacts or contact our FBI side watch directly. And you can go to multiple other agencies as well because what we've really said is a call to one's called all. And that's how we are ensuring that there's that kind of information sharing across the board here. So there was, sorry, Colin. Yeah, I was just gonna say, Cynthia's exactly right. You know, first of all, if you know something within your community, engaging directly with the local election officials is really critical to help understand, did you actually find something or is this something they're aware of? Otherwise, the second part is engaging with your state officials. They're prepared to take it on. They're the ones that know the process, know their systems, can talk to the vendors if it's a vendor issue. And then the ISAC exists for exactly this reason as well. There's an avenue and it happens fairly commonly that if you report to the election infrastructure, information sharing analysis center or directly into CISA, we now have the points of contacts that we didn't have in 2016 to be able to get valuable information to state and local election officials so that they can take action on something that's identified. So there are avenues, again, the state and local officials know their systems. They're the best prepared to mitigate a problem. But if you're not finding success that route, that the ISAC, CISA, FBI field office are available to help you get there. And understandably, some folks may not wanna go to the federal government, which is why the ISAC really offers a nice safe place to begin that reporting. I'll offer up EAC as well. You can send an email to security at EAC.gov. Obviously, we have connections with all the manufacturers. If you're having trouble with a particular manufacturer or having trouble with a particular agency or your local official or in just not getting the response you want, we're happy to help facilitate that conversation. And just from a cyber-concept standpoint, one of the big changes for us is, we historically had been focused, working inside skiffs. And one of the things that we've really done in support of 2020 is, we have organizations now that live outside skiffs. They're on NipperNet or unclassified internet. They're in Slack channels. They're talking to FBI. They're talking to DHS. They're talking to private industry partners. And they're living in that same ecosystem that many of the folks that are listening to this presentation are. And so we have really tried to adapt some of our behavior. So we're able to, in real time, collaborate with our partners across government on a little different time schedule than would be a traditional military one. Because I know most of you are probably not up at 5.30 in the morning, just to frankly. So Bill Evanina, the director of the National Counterintelligence Security Center just recently put out an official statement today talking about the very threat that we're covering here. But all of the threats were basically laid out in an equal manner. Would you say the threats are equal? Which one would you say is the biggest in life? I don't think we need to take any of the threats lightly. I think the statement in terms of what you saw out there it lays out how each adversary is approaching the problem. Certainly Russia, China, Iran, they all have intent and they all do activities that they think are advancing their best interests here. So I don't think I would say one is scarier than the other per se. Certainly some of these adversaries are a bit more experienced at this in terms of the amount of time they've been working, doing operations. But from our perspective, I care about all those threats. I take them all seriously because again, some of this stuff is very cheap to get into and to execute. So I wouldn't do a value judgment on those sorts. I could agree more on that. And I think that it's really important to remember that our threat picture is always informed by what we collect, what we know, and we don't have perfect pictures in here too. And how we really have to approach all of this is what could be the effect from these various groups? What could happen closer to September, October? Because it still is a few months away and we need to be prepared for a lot of different things happening within that. And I put stuff again, it doesn't just have to be the big three. It can be other non-state actors or criminal groups and the like that are going to undermine people's confidence in our system. And really, if you ask me what the biggest threat is, it's being a constant grumpy or influence campaigns that are going to make people feel like they're less confident in our system and that's what people would vote less. And that's really where, you know, eyes do have a night. Hey, Bryson, just real quick. Everyone in the Fed room actually has to take a drink because the Fed said foot stomp. So that's actually one sip for everyone in the Fed room. Thanks. Here's. Matt, I can't help but feel like you're cheating the system a little bit because you don't have a drink. Oh, I've been drinking this whole panel. Don't worry, I'm good.  Show us your drink. It's in a water bottle, but it's vodka. So we're coming close to our end of time. So I want to ask a final sort of grab back questions to each of you and you have about a minute to respond. So you'll have people. You get a non-internet connected wand, a magic wand that you can wave. What is your one-way chain wand? Is that the magic? It is, yes, that is how it is wireless, but wired. And you can have one thing happen for your agency. Don't, this isn't reality, right? This isn't, oh, if only I could get that $20 million to fund that. This is what do you wish from a process perspective? High to that debt is, okay. So 2020 is almost Britain. The vellum ballots start in a month. People start voting, those start happening. 2024 is our next big one. What is one good thing and one thing we really need to worry about in the future in 2024? See, I feel like I'm through the shortstopping right next to you. I like you the most. Okay, okay. So thinking about what I really wish we had more of is I wish we had more people right now with the SIRS skillset that we could hire quickly and get them on so that we could just expand our scope and scale and speed at which we're addressing threats. And I think that that goes towards, we're putting so much of what we have against the election and I feel really good about where we're at on it. But what does that take away from some of the other, did that delay other work? And that worries me. And I'd like us to know that we have the people coming to us that want to do the right thing, that I want to protect America and have those skills necessary to be able to help us in that. As a look for 2024, what I want to keep. So I hope we keep the collaboration and the focus alive. In my way marks, I gave a real quick overview of what the FBI guys, but part of it is, part of that focused on cyber investigations, looking at influence. We developed the foreign influence task force and that effort I think has really helped us focus on, it's not just a cyber issue. It's not just a criminal issue. It's not just an influence issue. Like seeing how it all works together, internal, getting the China people to talk to the Russia people, to talk to the cyber crime people and looking at it as one threat. That's new within the federal government to really consider it in that space. And I want to keep that moving forward. I think that, yeah, that's the ideal. You asked like a spectrum of a few of them here. So, but yeah, and I hope we all stay in touch after we put this in our review mirror. If you don't stay in touch, then the next panel is gonna be more awkward. That's true. I think the wand and answer is pretty easy for me. Perfect insight and adversary intent and operations is obviously a great thing to have. Dave, you're not supposed to say that you don't have that. You know what I mean? So, I mean, that's just gonna be important. Hitting a little bit on Cynthia's point and going back a bit to a comment I made before in terms of working counterterrorism, a lot of times you're fighting the last war, right? Someone tries to blow up a plane with printer cartridges like the government swarms to figure out how to stop that, depending on the adversary who's on it. This same thing here, we've seen adversaries evolve. We've seen new adversaries come in. So, there's always, you know, worry about, you know, what you don't know, but what I'm confident in is that we are positioned, a lot better positioned now for agility in terms of responding to these threats because of the systems we've set up, the partnerships we have. That is certainly something for 2024. We need to keep building on and not losing sight of it. You know, when new problems come up, you know, not making sure this remains a focus, I think the DEF CON going village is very important to keep us running. We need people's help. From NSA specifically, you know, we have a much, we're investing a lot more in the White Hand brand, the White Hand brand, excuse me. But, you know, NSA, cyber, Twitter account, please go follow it. You're gonna see more good stuff coming out of that. But, you know, continuing to build on that could be a critical thing we're gonna invest in moving forward. I can't tell you how excited some of the people were in our building, like Lee Mayne, the cybersecurity advisory on the GRU, on the mail vulnerability, seeing, you know, at least five different cybersecurity companies take that information, pivot on the indicators in there in their own data sets, figuring out new things that you need to know about, you know, to cover more of adversary operations. So, you know, that got people excited with building. And that's something we do want to do more of. And I had, again, just hitting on that critical partnership and that dynamic of us, you know, using each other's information and building, you know, that security of the enterprise raising all those. It sounds kind of falling out, Ash, but I think it's really, really important for the program. Hey, Bryce, if I could wave a magic wand, I would wave it and we would get COVID-19 under control. You know, I just gotta tell you, there's great collaboration, but we could do so much more. You know, we could do so much more with our partners here. We could do so much more overseas if we could get the pandemic under control. So please wear your mask and help us do that. The second piece, you know, where do we see this in 2024? You do get past the questions, but I get to answer the question a lot. So, you know, I would rather focus on 2020. 2020 is not a foregone conclusion. We can have a safe, secure and credible election. You know, as an American people, we need to mobilize. You know, there are thousands of smart people, extraordinarily technically capable that are watching this session right now. Please go work at the polling stations. Please talk to DHS. Please talk to the FBI. Again, you know, we are all in. We've got thousands of people that are going to work every day in order to support a safe, secure and credible election. And I would just ask for everybody's help to do that. I like the restaurant, I really do appreciate that. It's a greater sense of where we all are in the world today. If I could weigh my magic wand on EAC, I'd say that we would be doing better to get the VBSG more flexible and faster responding. So this idea that if we can get you researchers interested in election infrastructure and discover those vulnerabilities, report them responsibly and then we can get the manufacturers to patch and get those out in the field and much faster turnaround. I really, I think we'd be in a much better position. We're working toward that. It's still a process that takes some time, but I think we can get there by 2024. And just to recognize that the federal elections are over two years, but locals are running elections every few weeks. And so there's a bigger stake at play because every election that's run is a chance to show that we can do democracy right. We're going to keep doing it and it's done very well most of the time. It's just those few times where those will take ups, we have some trouble and it starts to erode that confidence. So the better we can get at getting those patches, much better off the whole system will run. Yeah, so the magic one, I got two answers I think and I had the advantage of time, which is useful. The first is if there was a way for CISA to push out service agreements or whatever the case may be to upgrade election systems, not just voting systems where most of the focus goes, but election systems, including workstations off of outdated and unsupported software. I absolutely want to do that. It's not just Windows 7, we're talking older and it's not that the local election officials or state officials don't want to upgrade. It's that they lack either that the IT supporter resources and I'd love to be able to give that to them. The second is getting to 100% auditability across the nation and having efficient effective audits for 2020. We're gonna be upwards of 92 plus percent of audible records, but we need good efficient effective audits that are transparent. I mean, Neil McBurnett asked a question earlier, he's making it his mission in life to get to this and I so appreciate it. If we can provide that public that transparent auditing process, efficient and effective, I think it would be a real success. Looking forward, there's something in elections called the election wall, where you literally lack the ability to look past the next election, you try and you don't even know what life looks like beyond that. But if I had to really push myself through that, it would be increasing the amount of support resources and I don't just mean money to state local officials to help them meaningfully manage the risk to their systems and really take some of the innovative steps that they wanna take that they're unable to either because of a lack of IT supporter resourcing that otherwise would allow them to serve voters. And then finally, I know I'm cheating, but a more resilient American public, a deeper understanding of how elections work, a deeper understanding of what their options are, how ballots reach them or how they can interact with the process and then how we reach our final certified elections. Again, that prepared patient and participating voter is everything as we look at 2020. I feel the same way that as Bill has organized for DeafCon that I can't look past this weekend. So thank you to all of the panelists for sharing with your organizations and doing, I have to say it is a lot better understanding the level of collaboration, the transparency on the fallibility and the improvement and very much looking forward to what we can do. We are all citizens and our voices should be heard. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks.


I swear to God if Dean says do you want your soul back one more time I'm gonna reach through the TV and slap him Episode's actually pretty good though That's a hot mug guys. Hey guys, this is my review for episode 10 of supernatural season six cage heat and this is One of my favorite Castiel episodes. He's got pretty good line in this one can't deny that This is the episode where Sam and Dean eventually get tired of proudly shit And they decide to turn the games against him and go after Crowley at his home Turf his home base with the help of Castiel and sort of the begrudging help of grandpa as well as Meg and Castiel and Meg well, we all know what we're gonna talk about in this episode So let's get that over with these two have one of the best lines best scenes in this entire episode Hell this entire season a really good build up to a really good joke when Sam and Dean and Castiel are at the weird hovel house that doesn't have a side of its wall But it apparently still has electricity and cable of some sort Castiel is watching porn and he says You know, well, I'm just gonna put the clip in It's very complex The pizza man truly loves this babysitter. Why does he keep slapping her rear? Perhaps she's done something wrong I can actually recall when I was watching this episode live that I went on Facebook and I made a comment about if the pizza man Loves her. Why did he hit her rear being one of my favorite Castiel lines of all time? And then about 20 minutes later, I would correct that with my new favorite line being Castiel is really funny in this episode the humor is spot-on and the Entire drama slash action of this episode is really good. There's a lot of nail-biting moments. There's a lot of tension There's some cool mysteries and while the mystery of Sam's soul is kind of put into a dead rut There are some cool twists in this episode There's a okay portrayal and the ending is really really climactic especially with what happens or at least what you think happens to Crowley That doesn't mean that this episode isn't void of issues within the first two Hell not even the first two minutes the first minute of this episode I had to pause it because Dean mentioned do you even want your soul back for the upteenth time to where I think it gave Me a headache today Dean is becoming more of the man-baby child that we've always kind of known him to be But to the point where he is near on insufferable and then there is the portrayal from grandpa Which they are reaching they are reaching so far with this storyline that Even you as a casual fan can see just how stupid this story aspect is the fact that grandpa wants His daughter back only because he's back There isn't any kind of unnatural feeling as to why he should be back that the whole idea of bringing grandpa back I have a thought I can't confirm it of course and probably you guys would be able to confirm this for me in the comments that They maybe wanted to try and bring Jeffrey Dean Morgan back or someone in capacity, but they couldn't so they went with a X-files slash technically speaking show alumni to try and fill in the gaps that they had to deal with considering The whole fallacy of trying to follow season 5 but aside from this really weakest shit aspect I'm not supposed to talk about it. Everything else about this episode is great. The action is great Meg is fantastic. Castiel is really good I love how Sam gets out of his room by biting his wrist and let's be honest So the Sam is the best hunter that the show ever has he is a ruthless killing machine also brings up the very reasonable Counter argument of not wanting a soul back that his soul has been in the cage with Lucifer and Michael For a year and well as we found out time and hell certainly moves a little bit slower than that of reality So Sam's probably a mushy gushy gush. The idea of trying to put that back into Sam is so Weak in terms of a story aspect that while Dean is trying to whine about it as best he can It is so easy for the writers to counter their own plot ideal To the point where you as the viewer are like, yeah, fuck that. Why would you want a soul back? Sure soul of Sam is weird, but the only one really complaining about him is Dean and everyone else now that we have made it clear that Sam has no soul Even though over the five episodes previous not a single mention of it Just some little bit suspicions now that we know he has no soul got to mention it Gotta mention it gotta mention it I do like how it ends because while we have seen the split of the brothers happen many a times this one makes sense If anything of all the times that these two would ever split up post season five This is one of the strongest reasons because honestly Sam has a very good point Why the fuck would you want this back in you?  Split slash betrayal storyline going on. I really do like this episode. So I'm gonna give it a six out of seven It's fairly enjoyable.  He was there, but let's see what you guys have to say about this episode I imagine y'all are gonna say the same thing. This is what you boys do sit around watching pornos with angels This is my second favorite episode of the season just add Megan you instantly have me hooked This is how you do a good supernatural episode the focus is on the main plot and is also so much fun I love the characters, but my stanza doubts have to be Castile and Meg Rachel Miner is just amazing as Meg and she and Misha have great chemistry even though I don't like romance and shows there is one exception to the rule It's that opposite of a track. It's why Destiel doesn't work and why I guess I am a Meg steel fan Oh man these acronyms in truth their relationship probably brings up Castile's second favorite moment in the series with the pizza man Versed out laughing the first time I watched this also freaking Crowley man Mark Trapper kills it in this role I have my problems the season six, but these episodes are really fun This one is definitely the kind of the flipping of the switch and we're gonna get into a lot better episodes as we go on KHT has always felt like a traditional episode you can get from the Kripke era It has drama humor action and most importantly the horror element Carly's apparent death comes out as a surprise However as at least we see Dean offering to help Castile in the Civil War After they felt like they didn't really want to work for demons anymore and have to find out another way to get souls Sam's soul back probably one of my favorite quotes in this episode an overall mythology of the other show has always been Before from soulless Sam when angels and demons agree on something call me nuts. I'd pay attention That is a good one. Hey, she's a great episode. I really loved Rachel Miner as Meg here She's such a badass and I'm surprised. I enjoyed soulless Sam. Glad to see Castile is interesting to see him make I have a make-out section with Meg episode wise KHT is just okay The writing isn't anything special and directing is heavy-handed However, I will enjoy the episode because of some of the actors performances Misha and Rachel have some great chemistry some fun and zip that makes the episode memorable Thanks to them there will always be the pizza man episode Mark Shepherd clearly had fun as both Crowley and the Alpha shape shifter Not often you get to torture yourself two niggling questions from the episode though One is how did Sam get the devil's trap on the ceiling sure Sam's a moose, but that was a high-high ceiling He's not that tall which actually that's a good point Maybe there was a box or something But yeah, no flicking the blood up at the ceiling and two did they ever explain how Crowley and Castiel pulled off The burning bones illusion Crowley's death looks pretty darn final without any remain anything remaining to even attempt Resurrecting I have a feeling it's just a flash I get some sort of Illusion that they're both contracting on yes, sure they don't explain it But the fact they're working together later on as we will find out eventually I feel that is a Reasonable unexplained thing, but I get where you're coming from there KHT is a great episode the abundance of great moments is what makes this episode memorable starting with the opener where Crowley is Torturing a shapeshifter makes return castes hilarious discover of pornography for the first time and the chemistry between Meg and him Sam saving Dean from the ghouls the argument between Dean and Samuel as well as the funny scene with a demon from the beginning says I can't understand what you're saying because I don't speak little bitch That definitely was a showing of the show in its times I've always found that they said bitch quite a bit back in the earlier days and whatnot All right guys now we're heading on to episode 11 of supernatural season 6 Make sure to give you guys the thoughts about that episode in the comments below and I'll read those off in the next review Otherwise guys, thank you for following me along We're now going to be heading into the halfway mark for season 6 Sorry if I've been grudging, but it has been a little bit of a rough road trying to watch this season It's kind of bizarre to watch a season still have the same really high production value that we were used to from Season 5 where the writing is just lacking and it's not even like on a dab level. It's just a very ill-constructed very weak and Very brittle Attempt to try to keep you focused to keep you engaged in these stories But either way if you guys liked the video leave a like and if you're interested in more subscribe I'll see you guys next week. Thanks for watching the video My name is Knitz and you might remember me from the animated cult classic TV show undergrads It's been a while, but I'm happy to say the click is finally getting back together in an all-new movie Thanks to a successful Kickstarter campaign But we are still asking for your support to see any and all updates about the upcoming undergrads movie Be sure to check out and like the bring back undergrads Facebook page and with any luck. We'll see you guys soon


Kathy and Elliot Lewis on stage. Kathy Lewis, Elliot Lewis. Two of the most distinguished names in radio. Appearing each week in their own theater. Starring in a repertory of transcribed stories of their own and your choosing. Radio's foremost players in radio's foremost plays. Ladies and gentlemen, Elliot Lewis. Good evening. May I present my wife, Kathy? Good evening. Listen to this. Does that make you want to take off to faraway places? Or this? That's going somewhere too. Would you like to be a born? Here's another one. That's more modern, and that's for moon travel. Here's what started all tonight. That's what Sara Lee's mother heard. And that's what begins our story tonight. It was written for us by Morton Fine and David Friedkin, and it's called, Sara Lee, You Are Lovely as the Summer Night. Every spring, Mama said she was going to do it. She finally did. She ran away with the circus. It stopped over one night in Thurman, and the next morning it was gone. Mama, too. It was something she wanted to do all her life. Ha, ha, ha. Ha, ha, ha. Mama? Ha, ha, ha. Well, there she was with the circus and all, so I hitched to ride the Panmar. Now I always liked Panmar on the mountains like it was on the lakes, or lots of people came here for vacation. Especially I like that place where you could stand and look out and see three states. Maryland, Pennsylvania, and another one I can't ever remember. I got a job at the Penn Star Hotel Chambermaiden. I fell in love too with Howard. He's a bum. Howard? A bum. Why do you say?  Now come on, honey, let's strip this bed. Mr. Abel wants this room ready half hour ago. Yes, ma'am. I know, Sarah Lee. I know about men like Howard. Yes, Ms. Ramson. Yes, I've been in the hotel business. Yes, Ms. Miss Ramson. The girl who was here before you. You know why she's not here anymore? Why? Howard. What did he do? She got carried away too. His white coat and black bow tie and the way he'd sweep through that door, soup overhead. She got carried away too. Well, what did he do? He let her on. Let her on so that the poor girl just withered like a pale rose needing water, terrible. Well, if he's going to break my heart, that's the way it's going to be. If I got to wither like a pale rose, that's the way it has to be. Guess you think you're in love with him? Yes, ma'am. When you don't have a chance, you see the way he's given the business to that girl who sits at the table six. And you see the way she's given the business right straight back. You don't have a... I do too. I'm making him supper tonight. Mr. Pascal's letting me use the kitchen I'm making Howard supper tonight. I'm going to serve it to him right in my own room. How do you like that, Mrs. Rimsson? And he's going to break your heart. How do you like that, Sarah Lee? More cornpone, Howard? Sure. Spoon you some of the last? Sure. Enjoying your supper, Howard? Sure. More coffee? Sure. Nice here, Howard, isn't it? Nice. On your feet all day, waiting on tables.  Nice. Howard. Hmm? I love you. I love you, Howard. Sure. What you looking for, Howard? Can I get you something else? Sarah Lee. Yes, dear? You're pretty. Prettier than that girl who sits at table six, dear? Sure. Prettier than that girl who was here before me and whose heart you broke, dear? Sure. You're not going to break my heart, are you? No. I wouldn't care if you did. Sarah Lee. Yes, dear? Come here. Mr. Pascal, in the kitchen, tell me I might find you here. I am maple sugar. You broke my heart, mama. I must say it's a nice night for the villain's patch. All those dances. Yes, ma'am. I must say you look pretty. Thank you. New dress? I traded Mrs. Lee in 226 some babysitting for her. Sarah Lee. Yes, ma'am? You waiting for somebody out here? I might be, Mrs. Rimsson. I thought you told me Howard broke your heart. Yes, ma'am, he did. Then how come you're waiting for him? He broke my heart. That lets more love come in. Sarah Lee. Yes, ma'am? We say he meets you tonight. He hinted he would. Well, he won't.  I don't want you to do this anymore. I don't want you to come around and belittle him, Howard. I'm a woman in love, and a woman in love is like magic. I can tell things. I can feel things.  I know he's going to meet me, but go on to dance. And he's going to say, Sarah Lee, I'm sorry. Sarah Lee, walk with me. Sarah Lee, I love you. I know it because of the magic that's in me. I just saw him get on the railroad train. The railroad train? The Baltimore and Ohio. He got on it with the girl from Table 6. Where's the magic now, Sarah Lee? Woman in love. What do you feel now? Who's going to meet you now, Sarah Lee? Who are you going to wait for now? Give me a letter of recommendation. Dear Mrs. Becker, Sarah Lee has worked for us at the Penn Star for three months. She's a good girl, a good cleaner, and very neat. She says she's going to Philadelphia to look for a job, so that's why I'm writing you. Maybe you can find a job there for her at the Franklin Arms. Say hello to Mr. Becker for me, Bessie Remsen. And Mr. Pascale packed me some turkey sandwiches for the train. Nobody saw me off. One fellow on the train wanted me to get off at Harrisburg, but I wanted to go to Philadelphia. The big city for me, Philadelphia. Becker said, as long as I'm going to work here, I should bunk here with you. Oh, come on in, honey. Put your bag down. You can use that bed right over there.  That's one thing about working here at Chambermaid. You can change your linen any time you want, Mrs. Becker never says anything. Also come six o'clock the rest of the evening's yours. I don't know if you ever worked at two-shift hotel before, but come six o'clock the evening's yours. Where are you from? Western Maryland. You got any folks? No, me neither. Oh, I don't mean my folks are dead. Mama ran away with the circus, and I don't know where she is.  Where's the linen closet? Come on, I'll show you. I liked my work. I liked Mrs. Becker. I liked Miriam, the girl I roomed with. I began to think of Howard the only in the afternoon because I was so busy in the afternoon. Then one day a funny thing happened. I was empty in the waste paper basket of room 411, and there was Howard. He looked just like him. There he was with his picture in the magazine, not on the cover, but on the middle page someplace open to where it was the way someone threw it in a basket. It sure looked like Howard. No, it wasn't him. The magazine said his name was Trevor West, and he was on the stage, but he sure looked like Howard, enough like him so that I cut out the picture and put it above my bed. Who's that? Well, I know. Well, you know, that picture's been cut out a lot. Good looking. Known good? Real good? What does he do? He do. He's on the stage. I mean to lie, it's just that he looked so much like Howard. Honestly, it could have been the same fellow, the way their heads were shaped in the mouth and the expression in the eyes. If he squinted, you just couldn't tell any difference at all. What happened then? I can't explain it all. Being in love with Howard and always looking at the picture, I fell in love with the fellow in the picture. My, then we'd walk out to a place where you could see three states. Maryland, Pennsylvania, and... You and Trevor, huh? Trevor and me. Oh, he loved me. He loved me so much I had to run away from him so he wouldn't be sitting in front of my door so much so he could be on the stage. Tell me about the lake. We'd go out on Lake Mead together when it was moonlight, nothing around except the crickets on shore and the music from the pavilion across the lake. Oh, I get loose pimples. You want to hear some more? Not now. But you ought to hear about the time we hiked together and Trevor killed a copperhead. Copperhead? Oh. You want to hear me tell it? Not now. Let me look at him, huh?  Let me look at his picture again. Trevor. Trevor. You walked with this boy. Can't lose with him. Danced with him like I've been telling you these last two months. My... What's the matter with you, Murray? He's caught up with you. He's even got a room on the third floor, your floor. Who? Trevor. Trevor? Trevor? How do you know? I saw him coming down the hall, I saw him and I asked the bellboy what his name was and he said, Trevor West. Move your head, honey, so I can see his picture again. My, I'm going over and lie down, honey. Think about him. Listening to Kathy and Elliot Lewis on stage tonight's play, Sarah Lee, You Are Lovely as the Summer Night. This Saturday daytime, the Peter Lindhay show returns to CBS Radio. Peter brings back with him, of course, his attractive, intelligent wife, Mary Healy. You'll be entertained, too, by the Northern Layton Orchestra with Eddie Wilson at the piano. It's the Peter Lindhay Saturday Daytime show, back starting day after tomorrow on most of these stations. Listen for it, it's fun. I'd like to describe Trevor West. I once bumped into a fellow, Panmar, who looked just like him. They both were good looking in a fast, dark way and they had wavy hair. And if a girl got close enough to see, he seemed to smile. I got close enough. I was making up the room when he walked in. He was wearing a silk handkerchief around his neck and neat gray flannels. His coat hung over his shoulders like a cape. He walked in and he came right over to me and put his finger under my chin and lifted my face close to him. You don't know how good you've got it. Sir? Steady job, three squares a day, a time to work and a time to play and a time to love. And no understudy, no conniving. The theater, darling. Darling? I have to. I'm sorry, but I've got to stay. No, no, you don't. You don't have to do anything you understand. Nothing. A girl like you. Yes. Well, what kind of girl are you? I've got to make up your room, Mr. West. Mr. West? How did you know my name? I saw your picture once in a magazine and... And what? Please get out of the way I've got to know. You saw my picture once in a magazine and what? Miss Becco, fire me. Did you cut out the picture? Yes, sir. Why? Here's your towel, sir. You'll have to hang them up yourself. And here's your soap. Catch. Yes, sir. What's your name? Sarely. Mr. West? Yes. You can have another one. Catch. Tell me. It's amazing. What is? There were the fella I knew once, Harry or Hale or something. Boy, he sounds just like Trevor's. Looked a little like him, too. Tell me what Trevor said when he saw you. Well, you know. What? He wants to marry me. Oh, my. He quit his job and he searched and searched and now that he's found me, he wants to marry me. Oh, my. Yes, sir. How long's it been? A week. That's right. I've brought you something. A ticket to tonight's performance of my play. I feel that a week's worth of chats that we have every morning while you clean up my room. Well, I want to show my appreciation. Oh, thank you. And a speech goes with it. Sarely, you are like cool drops of water on a thirsty man's lips. You are lovely as the summer night. Cooling as the breeze on a fevered cheek. Who are you, Sarely? I'm from Thurmont. No, that's not what I mean. What tribe of gypsies of shy pagans are you from? This is against the rules, Mr. Webb. Mrs. Becker is very strict about certain things. Let me look at you. No, no. I'll see you tonight. You were kissing that girl on the stage. You were wonderful, Trevor. What you said, what you told me, did you mean? Mean what? I was lovely as the summer night. Sarely, let's sit down. All right, isn't this beautiful? Darkness all around, and yet we know over there trees and flowers. I want to tell you something. Yes, dear. I'm lost, and I'm lonely. What? I'm lost, and I'm lonely. You? My hearts are rover, and my dreams wander the paths of the world. And I'm lost, lonely. Oh, Trevor. It seems I search the faces in whatever crowd, seeking. Is this the one I say? Or that one, is that the face? Is she the end to my drifting? What are you trying to say? Oh, Sarely. Yes, do you? So lost, so lonely. I'm here, Trevor. I'm close to you. Don't be lonely. Don't be. Sarely, Sarely. Oh, that's the most romantic thing I ever heard. Merely, you don't know the half of it. He said that to you? Yes, yes, he did. My boyfriend, Harvey, says a word. I like a man who talks.  He's always smiling. Trevor smiles, sad smiles like he's lost and lonely. Oh, my boyfriend knows where he is every second. Trevor kissed me, and it's a bird hurt against my lips. Well, when my boyfriend kisses me, oh, I'll get that. Yeah. Yes, she is. Sure, tell us. Well, I really wouldn't know Miss Becker. Bye. What was Miss Becker? Oh, she wants to know why Mr. West wants to see you right away. He wants to see me? Right away. I had a feeling he wanted to see me. A woman in love is like magic. I can tell things. Suitcase. Suitcase? I just phoned downstairs with a boy. He'll be right up. You're leaving? Yes, I am. But I'm not packed or anything. You're not packed? You said you were going to take me to summer camp, to thieves, to mystic places beyond the beyond, you said. You were there last night, honey. Oh. Places we all dream about, but we never get to. You mean never get to alone? That's right. Only in someone's arms. And you're going away? Yes, but. There can't be any buts. But I've got a picture of myself, and I've written a little something on it. What? Too serially. Thanks for a summer camp than thieves, Trevor. Oh, and it's in the frame. Leather. My show's closing. I've got to leave. What can I say to you? Just goodbye. Goodbye, Trevor. Mrs. Becker gave me a recommendation to go back to Mrs. Ramson. And the cook back me lunch for the training. Mariel couldn't see me off because she had to take my Florida Lake out of New Girl. On the train, a fellow wanted me to get off at Baltimore. But I'd heard about Baltimore. So I got back to Penn Mar. I gave Mrs. Ramson a letter, and she gave me my old job back. I didn't know how long it was going to last, because the season was almost over. As a matter of fact, it was a Sunday before Labor Day that there was a knock on my door. Come in, Howard. I thought it was. It doesn't matter. A man I knew in Philadelphia. Well, Howard, it's nice to see you again. What have you been doing? Nothing. How is it that you're back here in Penn Mar? I heard you went away with the girl at table six. It was table six with me. Where'd you go? Baltimore? Yeah. What happened in Baltimore, Howard? Oh. She didn't leave you? She just wanted somebody to ride with. She didn't even let me get off the train. I rode all the way to Richmond. Poor Howard. Sarah Lee? Yes, Howard? I've missed you. You have? Oh, yes. Honest? Honest. Oh, I've missed you. Oh, Howard. Sarah Lee? Yes? I love you. Do you, dear? Yes. Yes. My darling. Sarah Lee? What? You're lovely. What? You're lovely. As the summer night. Hm? Am I as lovely as the summer night? Sure. Then say it. Tell me I am. Sarah Lee, you're lovely as the summer night.


Hey, this is Brett and this 2019 Chevy Silverado 2500 Crew Cab Short Box LTZ is stock number 12674Z. We are here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, your new and used heavy-duty truck headquarters. This 2019 Chevy Silverado 2500 has the 6.6 liter Duramax diesel engine, 445 horsepower on this one. This truck has been fully-safetyed and inspected by our service shop. Has a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off and this truck is 100% ready to go. We're going to go all the way around, inside, underneath, start it up and take a look under the hood in this video. Summit White is the color and we shoot all of our videos in 1080p, 60 frames per second. So if you have HD capabilities on your computer, tablet, smartphone, or television, I highly recommend turning them on right now because it is your best way to check out the quality, condition, options, and cleanliness of the truck before seeing it in person. And if you like the video and how we do things here at Summit Automotive in the upper right hand part of the screen, consider clicking the subscribe button to our YouTube channel and then click the bell notifications and you'll get updates on the videos we do each and every day and you might just find your next truck there. It comes with the 20-inch polished aluminum rims. They are in excellent condition and got just a little bit of moisture on them from being outside, but they are in very nice condition and it has Goodyear Wrangler SRA tires. These are LT26560R20s and they have right around half the tread left on them. Frame and underbody is in nice condition. Front fender, excellent shape, I didn't see any dents or dings on there. Looks really good, comes with the projector lamp headlamps, factory fog lights, and the front bumper parking sensors. No major dents or dings on that front bumper. Comes with the chrome-trimmed grille, has a nice bug shield on the hood, and that is a true cowl induction hood on this one. And I'll show you that it is functional and how that works in just a minute. Comes with the clearance lights up top or cab lights, passenger side front fender, excellent condition, and the passenger side rim, no major scuffs or scrapes on there. As you go down this side of the truck, take note of how clean the body is, how reflective and mirror-like that paint is. We take these HD videos so if you are far away, or even if you're close by and just cannot make the trip down but you're still interested in purchasing the vehicle, you can see the truck, hear the truck, and have confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before you even get here. So when you do get here, there's absolutely no surprises, and you can make a smart and informed buying decision from wherever you're at. And if this video helps you make that decision, let your salesman know that you saw the video that it was helpful and that Brett sent you. Back tires have just as much tread as the front tires, and the frame and underbody is in very nice shape. Just a little bit of surface corrosion on the welds there as all the remaining factory exhaust, and the underbody is in really nice shape. Cab corners and lower rockers all look really good as well. It does come with the factory chrome step bars, passenger side fender, excellent condition as well, and the rear bumper is in very nice shape too. Didn't see any dents or dings in that. You do get the rear bumper steps, the rear bumper sensors, full towing package which includes a receiver hitch, four pin and seven pin wiring. The tailgate is in nice shape as well. Does have a locking tailgate backup camera, spray and bed liner, fifth wheel and gooseneck prep package. This one also has the LED bed lights which are right up there, and seven pin wiring in the bed. Tailgate shuts nice and solidly and as you go down the driver's side just as clean as that passenger side. No dents or dings on there. And for full disclosure this back rim is in very nice shape as well. Down the rest of this side of the truck, doors look really good. Does have the telescopic tow mirrors, built in directional signals, LED side lights.  There are no rips or tears on the seats, they are in very nice shape. Both these front seats are heated and cooled. Factory all-weather formats. Auto headlamps turned out a four-wheel drive and factory brake controller. It does have tilt and telescopic steering wheel. Power windows, power locks, power mirrors, memory driver seat. You get the Z71 trim, the Bose sound and these mirrors do power fold in. Now I always like showing both sides so that you know that both sides are working properly. We'll hop inside, check out the miles, radio and everything that this truck has to offer on the interior. You can see that this one has 43,123 miles. You do get the Z71 instrument cluster, compass and speedometer, digital speedometer on there. Information center is nice and clean. Comes with the heated leather wrap steering wheel. And that is in nice shape as well. Bluetooth and information center controls on the right. Cruise controls, forward collision warning and heated steering wheel controls on the left. Does come with the Allison heavy duty six speed automatic transmission with the optional tap shift. And it does have the factory navigation system on the Chevy MyLink radio, AM, FM and Sirius XM radio capabilities on this radio. You also get projection manager, you can project your cell phone to the screen via Android Auto or Apple CarPlay. CD player, heated and cooled seat buttons, dual climate controls. Power pedals, stability control, cargo lamps, that's how you turn on your LED side lights and LED bed lighting. Parking sensors, you can turn those off and on, lane departure warning, downhill assist control and factory exhaust brake. You do get two USBs, two 12 volt power points and then a 110 volt, 150 watt plug-in cell phone holder. Passengers side, floor mat and seat are in excellent condition. And the headliner is in very nice shape. I didn't see any rips or tears up there. It looks really good. You do get map lights. This is telling you that you have the snowpaw prep package on this truck, on-star and SOS capabilities. And this one does have the wireless cell phone charge pad on the center console there. We'll take a quick look at the back seats. And then we will start it up and then check out under the hood. Back seats are just as clean as front seats, no rips, no tears back here. It does have the latch child safety system for any child car seats. You may have fixed glass rear window with the built in rear defrost. Seats are in really nice shape. They do fold up like so. Carpeting and factory, all other formats are in nice condition as well. And you do get side curtain airbags on this truck. Bottoms of the doors all look really good. Are those LED side or LED bed lighting lights. And then you get the LED side lights, which are extremely bright. We'll start it up and take a look under the hood. Starts right up. No check engine lights or anything like that. I would personally like to thank you for checking out the video today. And hopefully from this HD video you will have been able to verify the quality and condition of this truck all the way around. Look at that, even the Chevy emblem lights up there. I didn't notice that before. And this 2019 Chevy Cerato 2500 is 100% ready to go. Has a fresh oil and filter change. Now the fluids have been checked and tapped off. There's that color induction hood. So the air intake is right there. Comes right through the middle and then goes right through that into the air intake. There's your emissions sticker. Like I said, this truck is 100% ready to go. And to see more pictures of this truck or one of other 450 new and used cars, trucks, SUVs, minivans, Wranglers, half tons, three quarter tons, one tons, you name it. We got to go to that website right there. www.summitauto.com. Full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle from two locations all at www.summitauto.com. And if you'd like to check out more HD videos, you can go to www.youtube.com. Remember to like, subscribe and share on this video and all the videos that you see there. Click the bell notifications. You'll get updates on the videos we do each and every day here at Summit Automotive. In fact, in a second you'll see a link to subscribe to our YouTube channel on the upper left. A link to more Silverado 2500 truck videos like this one on the upper right. A link to this vehicle on our website on the lower left. And a link to one of our latest YouTube videos on the lower right. Click those check us out. We're super excited to help you with this Ultra Clean 2019 Chevy Silverado 2500 Crew Cab Short Box LTZ Z71 in Summit White. Thanks again for checking out the video. Remember to like, subscribe and share.


The Legend of Zelda is the original test of courage, power and wisdom in the face of danger. The fastest player to navigate the first dungeon, slay the Dark Dragon, Aquamentus, and collect the Triforce piece. We'll survive to the next stage of competition. May the way of the hero lead to the Triforce. Can you see Zelda up here? Some of these players are not. I can tell you that I saw these reactions. We've got four contestants. Our first underground elimination, three, will be walking off this stage and out of the competition. One, we'll get to hang in there for a chance to be our world champion. And for this underground elimination, we've got some special commentators coming up for the play-by-play in this underground. Andre from Black Nerd Comedy, as well as Ethan and Andre from Nintendo's Treehouse. Welcome to the stage, everyone. I'm a kid now. I'm a squid now. Let's do this. Our first underground challenge is the Legend of Zelda. Originally released on the NES, our competitors are going to be playing it on the Wii U Virtual Console. And we have four players. They're all going to be playing simultaneously in split-screen. And it is a race from start of the game to the end of the first dungeon. The first player to navigate through the Eagle Dungeon, defeat Aquamentus, and then nap the Triforce piece, moves on to stage two elimination. What does that mean, Ethan? That means that we've got four players coming up. Only three here are going to be not progressing. We're going to have one going on to the next stage. So we're going to see what's going to happen. Let's go. And that one player, they've still got a chance at the title. They do. They can continue through. Let's do this. Alright, we're going to get to it right now. The game is ready to go. Are you guys ready for this? Let's do this. Let's go. Alright, in three, two, one, go!  They all know that it's dangerous to go alone. The memories come flooding back right away. No one wants to be alone. Everyone's saying it's dangerous to go alone. And there's that iconic beat. Alright, so it looks like they've all got the sword. They're making their way. Don't mind those off drafts. Just go. Just go. They're going strong. This is a wide open game, so you've got to know your route. You've got to know your way right to the first dungeon. And that's what's interesting about this, because there's so many secrets, but it's all about getting to that Triforce first. So we'll see what happens with the decisions they make. It's interesting to know when people speed around this game, they usually do the screen-scrolling trick to jump straight to level three. That's not going to fly this time. No, we've got to go level one. Mr. Blarney and TMR are already in the dungeon. Yeah, we've got TMR and Mr. Blarney in a pretty hot race right now. They went out and went in. They're leaving and exiting to open up that door, so they don't have to get the keys. I remember that from back when I was a kid. Stappos! It's the Legend of Zelda, and it's really rad. Those creatures from Ganon are pretty bad. Are you Zelda rapping right now? Octorox, Tectax, and Libras too, for which help our hero pulls through. Wiki, Wiki! Don't link. So we've got all players in level one. Yes. They're making their way through. Oh, someone's in the virtual pool! Oh, someone's in the virtual pool! It happens. You get excited, it happens. That is the most interesting strategy I've ever seen. Oh, we have one player, we have one player go down. Oh, no.  Sometimes you've got to check up on your eShop downloads. You've got to check that progress. He needed to check his meverse. It's okay, it's time. Stappos is going down. He's moving through. He's picked up the clock to stop the Stalfos. B&G 4000 just passing those keys, just going right through. Don't need time without jail. Mr. Barney just ignored the map. Mr. Barney's got it. Oh, man, TMR just got the map in the ego level. Oh, TMR! Oh, no! It's gone down. That's hard. You've only got three hearts at this point in the game. Get back in there. Oh, no! Mr. Barney! Oh, no! Oh, no! Oh, B&G! We're at B&G! Guys, I know we're excited for B&G 4000. He grabbed the Triforce, he survives! It's the undergrad! We've got a wave goodbye to the Mexican runner, Joven Shire and Mr. Barney. Come on, let's hear it for him. They fought valiantly. You guys made it to the stage. Thank you for playing. We've got some seats for you out here. Great showmanship. Thank you, guys. Let's hear it for these contestants. Great job, everybody. Thanks, guys. You guys can head on out this way. Great job, man. It's so hard to say goodbye to Nintendo World Championships. Let's give him a hand, you guys. That was intense. So, B&G 4000. He retires to the Ottoman of Doom. I guess over there, he's in the underground. He's safe for now. He has a chance to claw his way back into the competition, but now we're moving on to our next game. We've got our teams here. Trihex, Cosmo and Bananas. They'll be on Team Nova's, and Ascension, Sinister One, and Aaron. They'll be on Team Stars. But do you have any idea what this game is that we're playing? No, because it's concerning enough to not know what the game is about to be. It's another thing when you have no idea what the game is because you've never seen it before. Wow. Here is the next game. Stage two.