and talking to you guys. So what I want to talk today is actually, my introduction is going to be very similar to Natasha's. So I'm also talking about spin liquids, but on a totally different type of lattice. So I'm going to be more interested in a simple Heisenberg, finding spin liquids on simple Heisenberg models. So essentially we've introduced this new lattice called the stuffed honeycomb lattice. This is what it looks like. It looks somewhat complicated here. We'll go through and build it up. It's not that complicated. And we've gone through and solved this both classically and quantum mechanically. And this, I think, gives us a lot of nice insight into spin liquids on more familiar lattices, like the triangular lattice. So at first I want to acknowledge the people who've done a lot of the work. So my student, Jewishman Sahou, has done a lot of the analytical work. And Brian Clark and his student, Dmitry Koshkov, Banner Champagne, have done a lot of the heavy-duty numerics to understand especially the quantum phase diagram. And the classical model has already been put on the archive earlier this year. And since this is a conference in celebration of peers in part, I just want to also acknowledge peers because actually my first project with peers was working on frustrated magnetism. And actually saw Christian talking about some results extending from that. All right. You know, he did not fall down on this one. But you could really see on this hike, this was with Colin Brougham, so doubly on frustrated magnetism, that his enthusiasm and optimism was leading him to think that we had passed the trail junction because we should have been there already. Yes. I think that didn't come till later in the hike when we were still hiking until 7 o'clock at night. OK. This is from Boulder back in 2008. So I just want to start off with sort of the broad, motivated question of what are spin liquids? More for the students, which has already been partially addressed. So I'll go fairly quickly through that. And why should we care? Why should we look for new spin liquids? So the simplest definitions are possible quantum ground states and insulating spin systems. And more specifically, these are strongly correlated phases with topological order and fractional excitations. And these are really some of the simplest examples of these. We have totally gotten rid of the charged degrees of freedom and you're left with only spins. And so if you want to understand all of these more complicated problems and correlated electrons, it might be sort of easier to start with these spin liquid systems. OK. So to give the earlier definition for spin liquids, which came from Anderson is sort of a very simple picture where you can think of a spin liquid just like you think like a normal liquid. So it's a case where you have essentially a magnetic liquid. So the analog of a spin solid would be an ordered magnet. The analog of a spin gas would be a totally disordered paramagnet. And a spin liquid is something in between, where the spins know about neighboring spins, but not about the spins at infinite distances. So they're correlated, but they haven't formed any long range order. And so you sort of always get this kind of region of correlation at finite temperatures if you have some kind of short range magnetic order. But what we're really interested in is when you can actually kill this magnet and find your quantum spin liquid as the ground state. And a lot of the description we have of these is in terms of these valence bonds, which are spin singlets on neighboring sites or further sites. And you can think of a spin liquid as made up of these resonating valence bonds. And so this is just an example of what a spin liquid is not. This is something I can write down a ground state, which is an ordered state of these valence bonds. So this breaks both rotational and translational symmetries and is not a spin liquid. It doesn't break spin rotational symmetry, so it's not a magnet. But spin liquids are even more complicated than this. So as you see, spin liquids are made up of essentially resonating valence bonds. So I will have this state, but I will also have this state, and this state, and an infinite number of other states. And these are all existing in a quantum superposition, and that gives me my spin liquid. And one of the reasons we really like this picture is because it's easy to see that you have these spin one half excitations. So I can take this valence bond and I can break it, and then I can move these two excitations apart. And we see that these are both spin one half. I can move them freely just by flipping valence bonds. And so they're fractional particles. They carry the spin of an electron, but not its charge. Okay, so, and just sort of to connect to the early motivation for these was the connection to high temperatures cuprates where then you add in charge and you have fractionalization, not just into spin, but also into charge only degrees of freedom. Okay, so our first definition then is sort of this absence of symmetry breaking. This is kind of a negative definition.  But you would really like to see these positive definitions, which Natasha talked about a lot, this idea of fractionalization. So you have this spin on, all right, okay. So essentially your low energy excitations are these spin ons. You can think of them as fractionalizing an electron or fractionalizing a magnon into two spin one half particles. And since neutrons can only flip spins and it gives spin wave, a spin one excitations, you get these spin on continuance. Which are one example of a positive signature and of course we struggle in models like Heisenberg models where we don't have any nice exact solutions like you do in the Cataya to connect these in a very clear and obvious way to experimental signatures. The second definition of spin, sorry, this is, the more modern definition of spin liquids is in terms of both this fractionalization, but also this idea of topological order and long range entanglement. And this actually gives us the possibility for a positive definition, which is not particularly experimentally relevant yet. We'd love to make it so, but it's very useful when you want to actually look at numerics. So you can actually now look at your numerical solutions and say this is a spin liquid. So the idea is that you have some kind of topological order parameter like you do in quantum Hall states that differentiates different types of spin liquids. And you have this idea of long range entanglement. So a singlet in general is short range entanglement if they're nearest neighbors. And the sort of, I'm gonna go through this very quickly. So you can calculate essentially the von Neumann entanglement entropy. So you split your system into two parts, part A, part B, you have some boundary between them. You take your reduced density matrix where you trace out all the states in B and find your reduced ventrary matrix. Now just for A. And then you can calculate this von Neumann entanglement entropy by taking the trace of row A, log row A. And what you find generically is your first term is what's called an area law term. This is proportional to the length of the boundary. And this generally depends on the microscopic details. And then the next term here is a schema which does not depend on the length of the boundary and any other further terms are gonna be in one over L. And so we drop those entirely. And this is known as a topological entanglement entropy and it is universal. And I'm still thinking here about gapped phases. Gapped phases are a little bit more complicated. And if you have a trivial phase like a valence bond solid or a magnet, you're going to get zero topological entanglement entropy. If you have a topological phase, you're going to get a non-zero topological entanglement entropy. So for example, the two spin liquids we seem to find the most that are gapped are Z2 and chiral spin liquids. And these both have this topological entanglement entropy of log two. And you can define many other entanglement entropies and other quantities. I just give this sort of as a simpler example, but with these you can actually differentiate with higher, with more complicated terms, you can differentiate between say the Z2 and chiral spin liquids and you can start to see, sort of get positive identification from your numerical simulations at least. Okay, so to sort of summarize, we have these quantum ground states without long range magnetic order. You have no symmetry breaking in your original definition, in your topologically non-trivial modern definition, you must have long range entanglement. And this actually allows us to say, well, you can actually break some symmetries and still be a spin liquid. So there's chiral spin liquids, break time reversal symmetry, there's proposals of pneumatic spin liquids, just break rotational symmetry. As long as you still have this topological order, you're still a spin liquid. Okay, and your spin ons can have these non-trivial statistics and can be either gapped or gapless. And you have a whole big range of possible spin liquids. So Katayev is one example and there's essentially thousands of different kinds of spin liquids. And this then sort of brings us to the question of, okay, well, this is all very nice and completely theoretical. Most of these spin liquids do not have concrete realizations, at least not yet. That was certainly thought the Katayev model would not have any concrete realizations for a long time. So, okay, so what we wanna do, our goal is to sort of get to the point of first a concrete model realization and then second a concrete experimental realization. So where you want to go to find a spin liquid in the wild is, first of all, your key ingredient is this idea of magnetic frustration. So here I have a picture of a triangle and I'm imagining ising spins here and they have an anti-pheromagnetic interaction. And so if I put down two spins, I put down one spin up, the next one I put down anti-pheromagnetic to make this bond happy, then I don't know what to do with this third spin. So this is sort of the fundamental idea of frustration and triangles are sort of the fundamental unit of this frustration. In general, we want low dimensionality. One dimensional magnets are always, there's no language magnetic order there and 2D is much more interesting and you always want quantum fluctuations. So Heisenberg spin one half is sort of your best place to look. So, and then where you find them experimentally in the wild, the best example I think is the Kagame lattice. So it's named after this type of Japanese basket work and this is corner sharing triangles in two dimensions and this is sort of the simplest, the most frustrated possible two dimensional lattice because you have triangles that are as weakly connected as they can be. So from numerical simulations, GMRG results and exact diagonalization and many, many others, we know that we have a spin liquid ground state with a very small gap. Probably this has actually come back into being debated and it's a fairly stable robust spin liquid and experimentally there's a number of materials that realize this lattice but the best candidate for spin liquids is this material Herbert Smithite. Which is actually a naturally occurring mineral. It exists on the moon or where the temperatures are low enough so that you can actually have a spin liquids on the moon.  This has also again become more controversial since I first wrote this slide. Okay, so this is sort of the nice, a simple example on one of these spin one-half two-dimensional Heisenberg models. And there are many other possibilities. Sort of the next set of fairly robust possibilities are these organic triangular lattice materials which may be gapless spin liquids but are pretty clearly not a simple Heisenberg model. They're close to this Mott transition. And so I'm gonna sort of stick with the simpler Heisenberg models. And if we want to look now at models and not necessarily materials, we can look at a variety of sort of simple two-dimensional models. So if we look at the J1, J2 triangular lattice, we have 120 degree order for zero J2 and as I turn on a second neighbor coupling, I go into this spin liquid region between about 0.06 to 0.16 and then beyond that, I go into a collinear order. I also have the J1, J2 square lattice. Again, this J2 introduces these triangles. Still unknown whether or not this has a spin liquid for regions around J2 over J1 around one-half. And in the honeycomb lattice, you can again introduce J2. Again, it introduces triangles and frustration. And there you have a tiny region which may or may not be a spin liquid, probably not. Basically two out of three DMRG results say it's not a spin liquid and one says it is. So I think it's still up in the air. And you also get some valence bond solids here. But there's no experimental candidates for any of these spin liquids in part because it's sort of hard to get into this narrow amount of phase space where you have a spin liquid. So this is sort of the general idea of this talk is that if a spin liquid is in a fairly narrow region, can we do something to enlarge this region? Yes. I think it's fairly firm at this point. There is like seven or eight studies. So several DMRG studies, exact diagonalization studies, all show a spin liquid. The debate is more about what kind of spin liquid it is. Okay, so this question has then led us to introduce this model, which we call the stuffed honeycomb lattice. There's sort of a threefold motivation for this which has evolved over time. The initial motivation, which I'll talk about briefly is a material in the Themes Agatou, Militium III, Oxygen VIII. You can also engineer this in different ways. But there's also just sort of the pure theoretical interest in that it's a way to interpolate between the honeycomb and the triangular and also out to the dice lattices while keeping this hexagonal symmetry. So it's a way of taking your triangular lattice and making it anisotropic in a different way than is seen in the organic triangular lattice materials. Okay, so this is the model. I have a honeycomb lattice where I put a J1. And then I put an extra spin in the center of each honeycomb. So in the dual lattice to the honeycomb lattice. And then I couple these extra spins to my honeycomb sites. So if these bonds are all equal then I'd get the triangular lattice back again. And then I had J2s on both the honeycomb sites. That's where they are. And then also on the triangular sites. And for simplicity, I'm keeping these all the same. In some materials, in this material they probably wouldn't all be the same. If you're engineering it in other ways this is sort of a natural assumption. Anyway, it makes my face face two dimensional and makes it much nicer to present. Okay, so, and there's three sublattices. This is a non-Bravais lattice which makes our classical analysis a little bit more difficult. Okay, so our first motivation is this interpolation between the honeycomb and the triangular lattices. So we see there's a clear spin liquid on the triangular lattice. There might be a spin liquid on the honeycomb lattice and maybe the original idea is maybe you go a little bit away from this by turning on these J primes and you enlarge a spin liquid region. Okay, and this is, I should also also want to note especially since we're talking about Pierce this week that this is related to the windmill lattice that he has looked with along with Peter Orrith and Pregme Chandra and Yorick Chimalyan and which has all sorts of interesting classical order by disorder behavior. And what we find is that this is actually most interesting when we go to the triangular lattice limit and move off of it and we find essentially that what was a weak first order transition in the, on the triangular lattice becomes actually now a multi-critical point. I'll talk more about this later. So I just want to talk very briefly about this really interesting and totally inconclusive, not understood at this point material. So this is lithium zinc-2, molybdenum-3, oxygen-8. And the basic idea here is that you have clusters, especially molybdenum-3, oxygen-13 clusters are then forming molecular orbitals where they have a single spin on half and these form the triangular lattice. And what they see in this material, let me bring up, oops. Okay, this is the susceptibility, the inverse susceptibility versus temperature in this material. And you see two different regions of curie behavior. And if you look at the first region above 100 Kelvin, you see an effective moment of 1.4 magnetons, a fairly large curie vice temperature and you can essentially understand this as you see all of the spins are all in a paramagnetic state. But below 100 Kelvin, something very interesting happens, which is two thirds of the spins completely vanish. They're not seen in neutron scattering. If you look at there, so if you look essentially at your curie constant out front has become one third and your curie vice temperature becomes significantly smaller. And what you're left with is essentially just these central spins. And you can look, you might worry this is a single ion phenomenon but they've looked at the ESR and they see that the G factor is basically not changing. So the natural explanation is that two thirds of the spins have disappeared. And then that leads to the question of why on earth would they do that? And so this is sort of, the idea is that if you have this triangular lattice where you have these clusters, here's a cluster. What happens at 100 Kelvin, it turns out is that the lithium above 100 Kelvin is very light atom. So it's actually mobile those lithium zinc layers in between the molybdenum oxygen layers are disordered but they order at 100 Kelvin. So this then changes is gonna change the structure of your lattice. This is one possibility. There are other possibilities that Gang Chen has also worked on the breathing Kagame lattice. But here is sort of one possibility is that it can decouple or it can distort into this stuffed honeycomb lattice. So it can do this if you have basically your sites ordered in such a way that they couple to some breathing mode of this octahedron and then you can shrink or enlarge the oxygen sites and affect your super exchange. So this is one reason you might be interested in what this model does. I don't think it provides a natural explanation for this but I sort of, this is something that can happen is more what you should take away from this. What I think might be also interesting is to try to engineer these things. So you can engineer honeycomb lattices by just having bilayers of triangular lattices. You could do the same thing for this if you make just a tri-layer of triangular lattices.  And so you just stack them in this ABC fashion. And here you get your J1, J prime, J2 model where your J2 really is the same between the C's, the A's and the B's because that's your sort of intra-layer coupling there. So I don't know any materials realizations of this but it would be really interesting if someone could do this. Okay. So here's our classical solution. As I said, this is a non-bravellatus. So we have a very complicated phase diagram. I'm not gonna talk about all of the phases. If you want, you can ask me afterwards. There's some strange ones, but let me just take you through the important ones. So first of all, the axes here, I have my J prime over J1. So over here is the honeycomb limit. This, when they're equal to one is the triangular limit. If I go out to infinity, that gives me the dice lattice. And then the Y axis here is this J2 over J1. So the first phase down here is what we call an interpolating phase. It interpolates between a nail phase down by the honeycomb limit out to 120 degree order exactly at this triangular limit and then out to this very magnetic phase beyond J prime equals to 2J1. Okay. The next one is we have a nail phase here where the C spins are now forming 120 degree order. We have a collinear phase, which is the same one you find on the triangular lattice. And now we have two new non-collinear phases. And this is the most interesting region here because if you look at this now, instead of just having a weekly first order transition between your triangular lattice, 120 degree order and collinear order, you now have these two new phases that come right into this point here. And these two transitions are still first order, but these two transitions are now second order. So you actually have a lot more fluctuations than you would have naively thought if you're just looking at the triangular lattice. So this might be a very good place to look for a spin liquid. And in fact, we know that there is a spin liquid there. So what we looked at next is what happens when you go to the quantum phase transition. And so here is our quantum phase diagram. This is for spin one half. This is obtained with exact diagonalization, mainly done by Brian's group.  And you can find, understand what the phases are by looking at your spin-spin correlations and also looking at dimer-dimer correlations and the like. And you can identify phase boundaries by looking at overlaps of your wave functions or level crossings. And so what we see, we understand all of the classical phases. There's also some valence bond, solid region up here. And then we have this large spin liquid region. And that brings us to the question then of what kind of spin liquid is this? What can we understand about this? And what can we gain by going away from just the pure triangular lattice to the stuffed honeycomb lattice? So we see that we go from, instead of having this one line, we actually stand out to a fairly big bubble, which principle might make this easier to realize experimentally. So what do we know about the triangular lattice spin liquid? So people have done a lot of work on this, mainly DMRG and exact diagonalization. And so the current proposals are, it's either a gapless U1 Dirac spin liquid or a de-confined critical point. We can't resolve between these two possibilities at this point. We also know that it's very close to, okay, thank you, very close to chiral and nematic spin liquids. But is not itself chiral or nematic. And from our exact diagonalization, we can see it's not chiral. You need a finite chiral field to go into a chiral spin liquid, which is then very obviously a chiral spin liquid from these topological signatures. There's no obvious gap, which in exact diagonalization, you always have a gap, but then you wonder what happens as it goes to the thermodynamic limit. It's not clear that it vanishes. It doesn't look like it's nematic. And so this expansion to the stuffed honeycomb lattice has given us more face space to play with to sort of see how it might, what we can get out of going off of this triangular axis. So I'll go through this next part fairly quickly because I'm almost out of time and the conclusions are the interesting part anyway. So essentially we can do a projective symmetry group analysis where we look at fermionic mean field theories and look for the sort of finite set of topologically distinct spin liquids. So I'm gonna skip the details of how we do this. But okay, what it tells us is some set of spin liquids that are possible. So we find some 15 distinct Z2 spin liquids. We didn't look for chiral spin liquids, just symmetric spin liquids. And then what you can do, this tells you what's possible.  So what the variational Monte Carlo tells us is if you look on the triangular lattice, you have this U under X spin liquid. This is the single spin on dispersion. This is something described by only nearest neighbor hopping without any on-site potentials. And what you find is you have these direct cones. They have a six-fold symmetry. They're at, so I called them at the gamma point. They're obviously not shown at the gamma point here. And you expect them to be unstable to a gap Z2 spin liquid just sort of by their nature. They can gap out. They're allowed to by symmetry. So it's sort of naively what you expect. And so it's a bit of an open question of why they don't do this if this is in fact the ground state. So what we see when we go and break the triangular lattice symmetry down to the stuffed honeycomb symmetry is that we get two possible spin liquids. So the simplest possible thing we can do is we can gap this out. So you get second neighbor hopping. This is now allowed by symmetry. And you still, well, you have what were direct cones but are now gapped out. But again, they have the six-fold symmetry. This is sort of a contour plot that's meant to show you that. And this gives you now a gap to Z2 spin liquid. So this is kind of the boring story. There's a more interesting potential story which I can't tell the difference between which of these two is happening. But I will tell you now the interesting story which is the second possible projective type of spin liquid. Again, you can have second neighbor hopping and on-site potentials. But your direct cones here are stable. But this is no longer a U1 direct spin liquid but a Z2 direct spin liquid. So I didn't really explain what that was because I skipped that. It essentially means that your gauge degrees of freedom or your gauge bosons are gapped. And so in the Z2 case, I'm not in the U1 case. So the Z2 direct spin liquid is much more stable. We've actually broken the, okay. So the direct cones here are located at different places in momentum space. And so there they have a three-fold symmetry. So here you can see them as well. And so this would provide a way to sort of understand the results from exact diagonalization that you have a very small, either a very small gap. This is sort of an extreme picture in the variational Monte Carlo results. This gap is really tiny. And so you have either a very small gap or even fact distorted your spin liquid into this stuffed honeycomb spin liquid which is now has a robust direct cone. And all three of these are competitive right on the triangular axis. Once you go off of the axis, these two have significantly lower energy than the U1 direct spin liquid. Okay, so we're still working to resolve the difference between these two. You have to worry about the finite size scaling. So it's a little bit more complicated. So I'm just gonna put up my conclusions and I'm happy to take your questions at this point. Thank you.


definitely a cute style and I'm loving it. Yeah. Trying to go natural. Welcome to my channel. This is just a quick video, at least a lot quicker than normal, but I've been sitting on some little hats and tricks for a while now and I really wanted to share this one with you guys because I know some people still have this issue. So if you are like me and you hate crunch, this is a quick video showing you how to be crunch any gel. Any gel you want to use, Eco Styler Extreme Wet Line, whatever is the crunch use gel for you, it doesn't have to be crunchy. So to see the magic, stay tuned. I'm going to be using the Juicy Kills Hydrating Milkshake, the rest of it because I've been going at this pretty hard. So I'm using this as my leave-in. So I chose the Juicy Kills Milkshake as my leave-in because it's super moisturizing. I'm going to use my Eco Styler Crystal. I'll have this forever. Just because it has like a strong cast, my Stoomongous Jar of my Eco Styler Crystal. But of course if you did want to try this, you could just use any moisturizing leave-in product and any gel or styler. As usual with cabana gels, I'm going to re-wet. I'm looking in. And my secret weapon for avoiding crunch or removing crunch or killing crunch, yay, is to add a little bit of butter over it. So you can use any butter but I'm going in with the Baskin Bloom here and Buddy Butter. So you don't need a lot. Just need the bearest bit that you can get to spread on your hands.  So yeah. So if you want kind of more layered hair without a cast and you want to use a stronger gel without crunch, then you can try using a little bit of butter over it. Now I'm going to shake as usual and get my volume and everything because I still want more volume. This is not the wet look. I like to just like wait until I'm about to go to bed basically and dry it under the dryer so I get as much air drying as possible. So I'm going to air dry it until I'm sleepy. Then I'm going to dry the back a little bit. And that's it. Like the secret is just adding some butter on top. I haven't tried with creams. Like creams might technically work but might be more prone to flakes so I do recommend using a butter. Not even oils work for me to de-crunch my hair but butters just work like magic. Soft and moisturized. So if you want that to be you. And if you want to kind of use those gels because every now and again I use them. Maybe convenience. Maybe I'm traveling like just whatever the reason. I hated the crunch. I hated the dryness and I saw both. It's like 30 degrees outside. My hair is defined and my hair is moisturized and soft. So that can be you. You can be winning too. If you don't have the time or money or anything at the point in time to whip out some $15 gel or $12 gel or custard. I call them all gels but custard really. Then this is a way you can get moisturized hair. So yeah let me know if you had a seizure crunch. The crunch is sub. I beat the crunch. I'm super happy. Let me know if it was helpful to you. Let me know if you hear crunch or you love it. Because I know for some people the cast is everything and the cast is what kind of makes their hair last. For me I don't really need cast to make my hair last. Once it's set it's kind of set. Like for me whole is different from cast. Like I can have strong whole on a soft cast gel or custard. So I don't really need the cast. I can do it out of the cast pretty much period. And I love soft hair. And I guess we all love moisturized hair. Because my hair used to feel crunchy and dry. When I just did like the even leaving cream eco styler and even cream oil eco styler. My hair was still feeling crunchy and dry. So this solved all my problems basically. So that's what you guys. Thanks for watching. I'll see you in the next one. Bye.


All right, separate traders welcome on back here this Tuesday post traders talk edition Tuesday afternoon meeting today's February 8 Welcome on welcome on back everybody. Let's get a quick sound check just to make sure everybody could hear me loud and clear I just got back to my desk. Great to see Chuck Norman Bob Michael Tom Ron and Mark Gary and Michael a Brian as well Kathleen and Wendy I was about to ask where the ladies of the remark great to see Kathleen and Wendy and Lewis and all of us Otherwise loud and clear from all perfect. So without further ado, let's hop right into it folks right now The spies beginning to make a slight pull back off the high actually a little glitch here on my AMC chart Let me show the the SMP ETF the spy symbol here No, I always like to show that but it's just to say we had a really good morning heading into the early afternoon No after a brief moment of consolidation within the market. We ended up seeing a nice retracement back up and that's actually a Pretty relieving because at least heading into the market close yesterday things were not looking too good So I personally was expecting a bit more of a drop-off Heading into the morning compared to what we got and in fact once we ended up seeing the spy begin to you know Squeeze back up to make a new high. I mean if it's not gonna break any lower by the time it hits 10 o'clock 10 15 And I'll tell you what reversal time is coming a bit early and we ended up seeing that We ended up seeing the spy make a nice pop going into like 10 o'clock 10 15 and then ended up running up really well So with that we have AMC on the screen here just to begin You know normally just a sideless stock. We didn't really think much of it from the morning today But man this ended up making a great squeeze heading into the early afternoon I was just kind of flipping through my book map You know page here and all of a sudden I turned over to AMC it actually looked like a good short Well out of nowhere within a blink of an eye Just big squeeze and pop to make a new high and with that we ended up seeing the markets continue But AMC in particular ended up running up really well up until just about 1682 a tie of the day today You know obviously making a bit of a sharp pullback right now as the markets are beginning to know make its own pullback here So AMC could easily be a good stock to put on our watch list It's up over 8% you know shortable and trades you know millions of shares a day and you know best of it all We're pretty familiar with the stock. We've traded AMC More off-the-none really over the last you know month, right? So actually I'll tell you what I'm selling myself By putting AMC on the watch list here, but we'll do just that. I don't mind putting this on our list to begin It's just very tradable in both directions now at the same time as I say that I'm sure I could put a stock like Peloton back on our watch list here, too Peloton PTO and ended up making a really nice push with the market today But coming off of earnings of its own right? We ended up seeing a nice rally as this broke out above resistance off of 31 and ended up running all the way up towards the high There above 40, but essentially it broke above and right back under 40 You know you would expect for that to be the case anyway with it with it being the first time of it testing that as Resistance so you know just goes back to what we talked about in traders talk our weekly Q&A workshop You could be just conducted inside the cyber group room earlier today Hey, the more and more and more a stock goes up than up than up than up You got to wonder when is it going to begin to pull back and much like I you know is doing it in traders talk The question is not really when the question is where and that where is typically going to be off of a major volume level So you know just going back to CFE I like look what happened to this stock going into the close yesterday We were pretty hopeful for this to at least meet me to find some support, you know a higher low and then for a squeeze back up It didn't get it right so in the case of PTO when I mean hey off of 40 It ended up making a false breakout, but from that point ended up breaking in the trend line You can probably just see off the lows here built a nice trend off the lows throughout the day and For right now. It's just kind of consolidating. It's not moving nearly as well as it as it was from earlier today So, you know hey AMC I'll put on our watch list here Peloton not as keen to really just for a 37 dollar stack I would want to see it make a better move than what it's doing right now and actually a really quick thing with Peloton We've been following this off its IPO, right? I mean since it first became public This is the most amount of volume that Peloton has ever recorded in one day and we still have 90 minutes to go before the close This is a weekly chart just for reference and today is Tuesday, so you know, I think that's pretty telling right there as well I feel like more than anything this will just be more exhausted heading into the end of the day But given its range, I'm sure it can make like a 50 cent move here and there. I mean hell I think you just did that right now They just did that right now So, you know, hey it can make a dollar move, but given the consolidation that it's been making heading into the afternoon I'm not too particular about it You know, if this ends up making a big move up or down at the end of this meeting then maybe I'd reconsider Right. I want to just go right from top to bottom Otherwise and what we'll do is just scan across the percent gainers and lose just list here folks as we normally do All right, so what a break right there, but let's hop to it now We have a bunch of warrants on the top of the gainers list here to begin folks You could just tell based off the W in the symbol the VLDRW W X P o a dot W DCFC W the warrants are much less ill or the warrants are much more illiquid to trade makes it much more Difficult to apply level three. We'd rather trade the stock compared to the war now with that as we continue to go through You know so pa. I don't think this has warrants Maybe it does just to say at least ended up making a nice move from the market open It basically built a slingshot where it dropped off at first ended up breaking Essentially made the move down to four. I thought it broke under and over four I think it hit a low of four or two at the time there and then ended up running up really well Hit a high at the time of basically six and for the meantime here right now as we're talking It's not a bad little run up not a bad little move here on this SOPA trade at least from the 450 this time It broke under and over 450 and end up running back up pretty well here So hey, I like the afternoon move here Norman Norman called us out in our chat board just a moment ago too as I was beginning this meeting So, you know, hey, I could put this on our list to begin I don't mind doing so at least for right now now again at the end of this meeting if I have like a 20-stock watch list Then you know something's wrong. We got at least trim the fat there a bit But for right now that makes the cut DCFC Think this was one of the names in the runnings for the new Washington football team in the NFL DCFC It's obviously not related to the symbol. I'm just making a joke But it's to say stock ended up making a big pop today to where it broke all-time highs I believe I think that's all-time highs that you could see on the daily chart. Yep Well ended up coming back down rather fast and right now making a lower high So I'll pass on this for right now TDC pretty expensive. I should have realized that right there All right, so keep it going Peloton again If we don't really have anything to put on our list at the end of it Then maybe at that point I would put Peloton on if anything it seems like a better short that are going into the close Then long That's the one thing I'll mention even right now lower highs pulling back down more wouldn't shock me If like a 3550 ends up being a good bounce point on that trade just saying UCL right now. Yeah, this was one from the morning actually really quick from the morning This was on our lists on the pre-market list at least Fausto by the time it was nine o'clock You saw what you see here stock was dead by not nine o'clock So we didn't focus on it going into the open as much thankfully So ended up just dropping off right away at first and right now trying to get a small push-up here Same to be said on the AR EB trade ended up making a nice little bounce earlier off of three at first But then ended up pulling back and right now this thing's just garbage If this was short of all this would be a much better opportunity to work with you're heading into the close and then then anything Joby why the stock ends up making a nice trend earlier today? Joby ended up topping off at 469 but pulled back pretty hard and the pullback here is That's a killer. I mean it is short of all, you know, perhaps that could be the better play heading into the close LDI a little spotty, but trying to make that move up. It's at the HOD right now Harley-Davidson coming off of I believe earnings pretty flat though in the meantime to Cix PDD. I knew PDD was expensive. Just wanted to look at this one quickly at least notice at the highs This one I could slip on our list if I feel a real need to you know making higher lows Just broke out or just broke higher just a moment ago here. So it still looks pretty strong The SPF stock the news that came out on SPF today was basically an update to the news that came out back last month So I wasn't really too, you know interested in the stock just given that ended up giving a little push-up at first And right now you could say it's trying to maybe hold over that peak, but it's dragging back Just bad say it's dragging back down and out of nowhere just slipped a bit down towards, you know 470 so You know, we can put this on our list if we feel a real need to at the end or maybe after this meeting if it ends up Showing more signs of life on the way up, you know, that's different All right, I'll tell you what folks not much else. I found on the gainer side for right now I am in two traits. I'm in two traits. The reason I say this right now live right now It's because this is one of them I'm in on SLQT as a short. I have my stop set literally at 327 328 so if it pops up a smidge here, I'll get stopped out on a smaller position But just to say though this stock is shortable It has been from the morning at least on trade stations end, you know Ended up making a nice dead cap bounce heading into the late morning as it was gradually building those higher lows But hey, I mean if it's not going to continue to make that push It's down enough to where you could hope for that dead cap bounce and we got it a bit at first So I thought that you know when I jumped in earlier, you know prior to 230 I thought this was a decent opportunity, but you know right now I'm not out of the doghouse on this yet. This may easily pop right back up and stop me in You know, I mean that would be all right if that's the case, but nonetheless, this still this still remains pretty tradable I think you know, it's shortable. It's not too close to ground zero too close to literally zero bucks It's pretty flat right now. Don't get me wrong It's like kind of just in the sideways move here, but I'll put this on our list for right now It's down enough shortable at least so you could try and short it should we see more signs of life going down Yeah, so for right now, we'll see where this takes us here the SLQT trade P LSE not a whole lot happening there. That's for sure KPTI I saw KPTI earlier today KPTI was on the losers list. It was on my notepad this morning I was thinking about it. I didn't really prep up the chart I didn't trade it after the open looks like it could have been a good short though from essentially 9 where it held the High of the day there down towards just about 780. You know what I mean? Like that. That's a good trade and For what it's worth. It's relatively close to the lows right now just seems more flat here Kind of like that SLQT trade and this one's not down as much I could put this on at the end if I feel real need to I want to see if there's anything looking even better though first Anything even closer to the lows of the day right now or you know, if there's a stack I skipped over on the gainer side That's up big. All right, we'll keep it going here folks Hey, maybe not for long because this is it on the loser side not a whole lot else that I see that's like a familiar name That's down big at least there are some stacks that are shortable. I'll click on those pretty quick Edit EDIT this actually looks good on the chart good on the order book It's only trading about two to two or three thousand shares a minute That's not a whole lot really so chart checks out good order book is not too thin But I don't know. I feel like there could be better shorts in terms of the amount of volume per minute that this stock is trading Want to see maybe just a little bit more on that side All right, folks I think that's just it for me if there is anything else let me know type it in the chat board and I will mention the second Trade I'm actually in right now. We'll see how that chart looks. I know I'm up on it Neo and I oh just a sideless stock. That's it. Nothing a really right home about on this trade I'm currently short right now from 2460 so up a little bit But it's not making that big drop that I would hope for it was earlier before we started the meeting but Yeah, we'll see where it takes me. I'm gonna hang on to it for right now I'm not gonna put this on our special list up All right, welcome back Mitch Mitch from YouTube Mitch has a nice chat for all of us here right now asking about the MNDT trade That's MDT whoops MNDT trade That's what I'm talking about. All right, nice little pop your Mitch good call got halted at 239 Eastern here folks Current time is 244. That's just that's just about five minutes from right now Which means the stock literally in the next one or so minutes if not less should be reopening up And if it's not within the next 60 seconds, then it's gonna be a 10 minute halt instead But for right now, it's hard to not put this stock on our list It's trading over 1.7 million shares right now, you know over 300,000 shares poured in right off the spike here So I don't know what news came out, but this looks pretty interesting for the meantime MNDT As I'm talking here, I think that it's gonna be a 10 minute halt seems like it's not opening up yet News out on MNDT from rich who posted this in the chat board just now Following up for Mitch's call out there. I says that Microsoft is pursuing a deal for MNDT by the rumors sell the news I reckon right? Pretty interesting and John give us the heads up on that as well inside the trading room Brian says Josh take a guess as to what trade I just jumped into 10 minutes ago I'm gonna guess that it starts with the you and ends in a wide ends in a Y. Is that my guess Brian? You went on a UV XY right now He says lol. Yes off 1338. All right shaking down a little bit, but he's off to a decent start still, right? There we go, Brian. Nice Ron W says Ford F heading back down, you know, hey, that's just a good sideless stock, you know dropped off early today I'm looking down on my notepad folks we got four stocks to work with in total so far I thought this would have been like a 15 20 stock watch list really So I'm pretty happy with how I kept it pretty selective and limited there But that leads me to say though one more time if there's any other stocks that I missed There's anything else that you would want me to look at here last call folks Looks like the airlines are all still holding strong as the spies beginning to dip back down a tiny amount Jets is kind of flat, but at the high the airline ETF. So that's where I was checking out Delta Airlines up over three and a half percent I mean, hey, it's at the highs UAL you can say the same thing a little bit more expensive American Airlines is likely the stock that we'd be more inclined to follow You know those could still be on the side list right now I mean there's not a huge need to put this on the main list just yet. I like what we have folks We got four stocks to work with in total That's all we really ever need to begin with and then you know typically after three o'clock when rich comes back on the mic here You know, that's when we'll look to re-scan the market a lot more seriously. I like to say at that point Why do I say it that way folks? It's because as soon as I finish up this meeting not often But you know, sometimes I'll see a call-out tossed around inside the chat board It's like that stock's not worth watching come on, you know come on unless if the stock's making a big pop Big drop as soon as we finish up this meeting folks I would definitely suggest for you to start with the list here first and then at three o'clock Hey after we start following the stocks that are on the list then at that point at three o'clock when rich comes on the mic Then we'll do a second round of scanning and seeing if there's any other big moves at that point But hey, we just ran through the whole market these four stocks that we're gonna put on the watch list At least for right now provide as good of an opportunity as anything in order for us to make some money All right mark s says MNDT 10-minute haul. Yeah. Oh It's going on 10 right now. It's gonna open up likely in the next one minute. All right folks But with that, let's just try and follow this stock here alongside the other three heading into the close For all of us on YouTube and Facebook live really quick I mean normally post my email address as I do here at the end of these streams But I know that we have a webinar lined up at four o'clock eastern time today Make sure that make sure to go right down to the link on the banner below the stream there to get yourself registered That was those doing a free introductory today trading webinar titled keep it super simple trading So that'll be right at 4 p.m. Eastern time for all this live inside the trading room at least hey You got us for another hour before that we'll post the link for that at least inside the cybergroup room Just as we're winding down towards the end of the day. All right folks But for Brian Ron John Kathleen Henry Debra all of us otherwise inside the chat board I look forward to talking to you folks later on at 3 30. Take care