Let's present Hollywood! Here's a blessed portrait, though. Bingo! The Luck Radio Theatre. Darling Lorena Young and Hugh Marlowe in Come to the Stable. Ladies and gentlemen, your producer, Mr. William Healy. Reading from Hollywood, ladies and gentlemen, this is the season of the year that brings new life, new hope, and a rebirth of faith. Spring is in the air. Ladies are shopping for Easter bonnets. And there is a joy, well, in just being alive. In the spirit of this season, we want to bring you a beautiful story that will bear many retellings. Its 20th-century foxes come to the stable. And repeating her inspiring performance in this modern drama of unwavering faith, is lovely Lorena Young and recreating his original role as a talented actor Hugh Marlowe. And now, before our curtain goes up, I want you to hear of an important discovery about Lux Toilet soap that is wonderful news for your complexion. Tonight, I want to make you a promise. A promise you can improve your complexion. Make it smoother, firmer, fresher, clearer, with daily Lux soap care. And here's the discovery that proves this promise. Lux soap care has skimtonic action. Remember that phrase, skimtonic action. It means that Lux care stimulates your inner skin. Now, you probably always thought of your skin from the outside. Tonight, think of your skin from the inside, because real improvement begins on the inside. Scientific tests show the more you stimulate your inner skin, the lovelier your outer skin looks. And that's just what Lux skimtonic action care does for you, for any normal skin. It means your complexion will look smoother, firmer, clearer, even younger. You can easily prove this for yourself. Try Lux. Start your daily Lux care tomorrow. You'll see that with skimtonic action, just one take of Lux can make your complexion definitely smoother, definitely fresher. Now, here's come to the stable, starring Loretta Young as sister Margaret and Hugh Marlowe as Bob Mason. The late winter afternoon, the New England countryside. Against the whiteness of the snow, are two small figures who pause now at a crossroad. Hey, sister Margaret, what is it soon? Jordan, Galilee, NASA, Bethlehem, Bethlehem. Oh, God is good. Oh, yes. And look, sister, the stable. But most of it over there. The stable. I think we reached our journey then. Perfectly charming. Oh, do come in. Thank you. And how do you do it? You are missing me the part to paint the beautiful religious picture. Oh, thank you. Yes, I am. Well, this is sister Scholastica and I'm sister Margaret. Are you sure we're not intruding? No, no. Keep it down. Oh, thank you. But how did you get here? We walked. We walked? I don't know from this station in this snow. He sent it now sitting for our pilgrimage. To your pilgrimage? Yes. To the stable. Oh, I see. And tell me, sister, you're from some order in the city? No, no, we're from France. We're the owner of Holy Endeavour. Our ship came into the Arborette down. We were on go to see the Statue of Liberty. That's fine. But no, you don't have to explain people. No, no, I was born in Chicago. But I went to school in France and took my vows there. And now we're going back to Chicago for the visit. Oh, no, no, Miss Hoffman. We come here to build a hospital. What? In Bethlehem? Yes. Yes, you see, during the war, sister and I worked in the children's hospital. It, uh, stood on a hilltop and in the path of an advancing American armored division. The Nazis were using it for an observation post and, well, it was inevitable that the hospital would have to become a target. I see. So I made a promise to God that if he would help me get through to the American General and the hospital would be spared, that I would one day come back to my own country and build just that hospital for her sick children. Goodness! Did you get through? Oh, yes. Yes, we got through. Three days later, when the attack was over, the hospital still stood. Well, you see, Miss Potts, God kept his end of the bargain, and now I'm going to try to keep mine. And since the Scholastic is promised to help me, then let me select our little community for your hospital where you know that was a hand of Providence. We have postcard with a reproduction of your painting come to the stable. And on the back of it, it tells all about Miss Aminia Potts, the lady who lived in Bethlehem and who painted religious pictures. Oh, I'm very flattered that someone sent it to you. And the bishop, he's working with you, of course. Well, we haven't seen the bishop yet, but 69 came to call upon him tomorrow at Sam's point. Then, uh, you will stay to stop. Oh, thank you. And then I think you're the train. Oh, yes, yes, there is. It leaves for Sam's point tomorrow morning at 8.15. Tomorrow morning?  We can speak anywhere. But I only have a tiny spare book. It's new. Oh, yes, it will be nicely. Oh, just a little bit. What? Oh, this is now small. Oh, what a lovely painting. Oh, yes. Just a few, lady. Oh, just a little bit. Just across the way. Just across the way. Oh, sister. So you're gonna hit? No. In the morning, sister, when it's light. I guess. When it is light. Done. Mademoiselle? To that beautiful hill. To that beautiful hill? And this is a very spot, sister. We're buried with him. Yes, sister. He and the snow. The medal of Saint-V. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, amen. Dear Saint Jude, with the help of our Lord and his dear children, we will build your hospital. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, amen. Arson! Arson! Come back here, Arson! Mademoiselle! Come back here! Come back here! Mademoiselle! Mademoiselle! Mademoiselle! Mademoiselle! Mademoiselle! I'm terribly sorry. All right, Arson. All right, boy. Down, down, down, down. Easy, boy. Take it easy. Very not. He's, uh... a great gong, isn't he? Yes, but he's just a pop-up. Oh, I see. Why do you call him Arson? It's a criminal name to such a lovely dog. Well, you see, he was raised in the firehouse here in Bethlehem. Oh?  You should see him when he hears a bell clanging. Oh, there. My name's Mason, Bob Mason. Are you, uh, visiting here? Oh, at the moment, yes. We're guests of this pop. Oh, Amelia. How nice. I'm her landlord. She runs the stable from me. Oh. Then you must own this property, Mr. Mason. Is this the store I'm in? Oh, no. That's my place over there. Beyond that orchard.  Yes, it gives us shame. Why? Yes, I suppose it is. But, uh... Well, I don't want to sound like a game-warden. But why are there two ladies of your gentle persuasion admiring the scenery at five o'clock in the morning? Oh, we always get up early, Mr. Mason. It's our custom. Well, it's bedtime for me. I do some of my best work after midnight. Oh? I write music, popular stuff, mostly. Jive, jazz, swing, that sort of thing. Ah! Is that it? Yeah, that's right, sister. Well, Mr. Mason, I... I've always thought that music of that type so well, so tense, so new, this... would be written in, well, big cities. Well, almost a bit, I guess, but... I like peace and quiet, so I live out here. My educated friends tell me they have something to do with the man's feeling of insecurity. Oh, Mr. Mason. God's the only answer to man's insecurity. Yes. Yes, I suppose so. Ah, tell me. Who dies on this hill, do you know? Well, a man by the name of Luigi Rossi. Oh, do you know him? No, sister, I should say I don't. Well, I don't suppose I'll be seeing you again, but the best of luck. Come on, Arson. Ah, thank you very much. Good night. Good night, Mr. Mason. Um, Luigi Rossi, he says. He looks frisky. We must see the bishop. He's also coercent. Let us hope he can see us today, sister. We have come all the way from France to build a hospital. That's, uh, quite a project, sister. Oh, I knew it seemed so, your Excellency, but we are prepared to go about our task in a most business-like way. Uh, and with a job to know that we have cut down our central to only two items. Well, that sounds very practical. What are the two items? Land and money. Oh. Just land and money. Yes, yes. And we've already seen the land, Your Excellency. It belongs to Mr. Luigi Rossi. Uh, Mr. Rossi and I are sincere in our belief that Mr. Rossi might donate the land to us. Luigi Rossi. The name is familiar. But, uh, even if you get the land, what about financial support? What have you got? We have given the session a far read. Yes, but what have you got? Well, nothing yet, Your Excellency, but, uh, we've all just arrived. Well, your courage is beyond criticism, sisters, but, uh, I can be of no financial help to you at all. It's heartbreaking to have to say this, but I, I just can't give you my approval. Even if you could get Mr. Rossi to donate the land, please, Your Excellency, if you'll give us a little time just to try. Well, if I were to grant you a month, have you money for living expenses? Oh, clearly. What can I do?  Still, his parts may welcome a few extra groceries. I think the diocese can help to the extent of, say, uh, $50. Oh, thank you, Your Excellency. And now, just as soon as we can, we'll see Mr. Rossi... Luigi Rossi. Now I remember. Sisters, this man Rossi. Well, he is... Mr. Rossi? Nothing. I wish you success, sisters, and God bless you. I just wanted somebody to meet me here. Oh, no. Got a party to go on? Oh, no, just in a hot place. That's quite a hike through the snow. Hey, wait a second. See Anthony? Yes, sir. Hey, can you give two ladies a lift? Yes, sir. You don't mind riding on top of the snow? Eh, you know, sisters, he works for Mr. Mason. Get right in, ladies. Oh, pardon me. I mean, sisters. Sister, look. A jeep. Yes, ma'am. And I've got kind of load here. Yes? Yes, I see you have. You know what? Perhaps you'd better sit on the back, Anthony, and sort of hold the boxes to cure, and then Sister can ride up in front with me. But who's going to ride? Oh, I will. What? Who's going to ride the jeep if you ask me like I asked all about the jeep? Yes. Are you all right? Yes, ma'am. I think so. Good. Then let's go. Stop for a care of it, girl. Would you mind telling me what sort of sister you are? Why, certainly. We're the Order of Holy Endeavour. Oh, not always, ma'am. I'm sure. You're permitting this guy. Isn't that nice? Yes, ma'am. But we can stay a month. Ah, are you going to stay here? Oh, dear Miss Tops, we hope you would invite him. Oh, thank you. You're very welcome. I'll go. Thank you. And now our next guest is to say Mr. Rossi about the land. But they shouldn't have forgiven me right now. Let me think, sir, girl. He gave us 60 dollars. 60? Yes. We're going to share it with you. And with the help of our Lord, perhaps Mr. Rossi will donate the property to us. Then, ma'am, do we need you, Rossi? Yes. Do you know where he lives, Miss Tops? In New York, somewhere. New York? Well, then we'll have to ask Mr. Mason to loan us a jeep. Ah, yes. We'll ask him very early in the morning before he goes to sleep. Yes, ma'am, Miss Tops. But I have to find people like you. We will have our husband in yet. The mother. All right. All right. Keep your shirt on. But it isn't six o'clock yet. We thought we caught you when you finished your work and were relaxing. I was relaxing all right. Well, what can I do for you? Oh, we're so sorry. We understood you to say that you worked your night. Well, I do, usually, but I... Miss Tops. Yes? May we buy your jeep for the day? Well, yes. Yes, I suppose so. It's in the garage. Oh, I get it for you, but I'm not dressed now. Oh, no, thank you, Miss Tops. We can manage. Our Lord will bless you, Miss Tops. Glad to help you out. Good night, sisters. Good morning. Either the jeep or... Oh, yes, the key. Yeah. Well, Anthony went to the town last night. Well, I'll see if I can find it for you. Oh, you'd better come in. Oh, no, thank you. We'll wait here. Oh, okay. Oh, you've lied to a young man, isn't he? Oh, yes. Perhaps you would like to make a donation? Oh, thank you. Now, this is not the propitious time. No? No. Oh. Well, I found the key. Thank you very much. And good to have beside you gotten you out of bed again. Well, that's quite all right now. You're sure there's nothing else? No, nothing else. Thank you. And if you need any gas, fill up in the village. You can charge it to me. Oh. Good morning. Good morning. Good morning, sisters. What can I do for you? Oh, feel dreadful, sir. I'm about to start a new organization, but... Well, good morning, sisters. Good morning, Anthony. Morning, boss. You up already? Yes. Hello, sir. How are you, Anthony? Oh, sorry, boss. We're the best kind of things. Pay no attention to the slower, earlier states. They ain't coming. Yeah, well, remind me to write a song about it. You're about to ask, sisters. Oh, yes. Do you know where we can find Mr. Rossi? The telephone company says he doesn't have a phone listed. I'm sorry, but I wouldn't know.  You want to find Mr. Rossi, sister? We'll get that in a few minutes. Any solution? Oh, thank you, Anthony. And thank you again, Mr. Lace. I hope you have a pleasant day. Thanks, I shall. A long one. Oh, would you know where Mr. Rossi is? Of course I know. One of the biggest gamblers and bookmakers in New York. Oh, I didn't know that. Sorry, Anthony. That's something you'll have to find out for themselves. Oh, dear Mr. Rossi.  Tell that thin Dominic to get out and start making a collection. So what about them from you? Well, you gave him the money, didn't you? To the long money. And where's my hundred bucks? All the way, baby. Took the money, but then... They did, huh? I'll show you how to get rid of him. Yeah, it works. Oh, you, Mr. Rossi. Yeah, that's right. Now listen, sister's a... Well, Sam, what are you standing around for? Get Santa Anita. Santa Anita? What are you talking about? I heard my name. Oh, forgive us, Mr. Rossi, but... You mentioned there's Santa Anita and sister said she couldn't recall a saint by that name. Well, I'm not interested if there is a list. All I know is there's a racetrack name. Oh, but there is a Santa Anita, Mr. Rossi. That's Spanish for Saint Anne. Oh. But it allows to introduce ourselves. I'm Sister Margaret, and this is Sister Scholastica. I'm poised to meet you, but... I don't know what you're talking about. I don't know what you're talking about. I don't know what you're talking about. I'm poised to meet you, but I'm busy saying I haven't got... Oh, I'm sorry, of course. Then we'll get straight to the point. Mr. Rossi, you only do have a piece of property near Bethlehem. What? We've come to you because we... we are most desirous of acquiring that property for a children's hospital. I'm sorry, but it's not for sale. Well, but it's not for sale. Perhaps you would consider... Look, yeah, say, sisters, this setup I got is too good to last forever, and when things get too hot a year... Well, that is... When I figure it's time to retire, I'm going to build me a place out there, you see? Hideout, see? It's strictly early Americans. The old Warthi estate, you know? Oh, well, I see. Well, it's only natural that you should want security. Yeah, that's it, sister. Security. Yes. Well, thank you for seeing us. It was most kind of you, and for your generous contribution. Ah, it's okay, sister. It's okay. Good luck telling you, anyway. Oh, God's been very good to us. I bought that for me two days ago, and already we've made such good friends. Both? Yes, yes, in France. Been how long? Oh, yes, many years. All through the war? Yeah. But don't know to fight them? I mean, when the GIs landed? Yeah. Any ways, no low winds? Yes, quite often. Look, I know it's a long shot, but... I wonder if, by any chance, you're having a run across that Corpo Walsy, Luigi Walsy Jr. That's my kid. That's what he wants. Oh, look, look, hello. Now, I'm sorry. I wish we could do what we had, but there's so many of you, you know? Yeah, yeah. Well, so on, sisters. Goodbye, Mr. Walsy. Mr. Walsy. Your son did come back, didn't he? No. I'm so sorry for you. I don't even know where they buried him. He was one of them, unidentified ones. Now, you'll see a special prayer for him, Mr. Walsy. Thanks. Goodbye. Goodbye, Mr. Walsy. Uh, wait a minute, wait a minute. This hospital you're going to build, is it going to have wonders? Oh, yes. Yes, we wanted to see it. I'm talking about special wonders. Uh, color glass and lighting on them, you know? Oh, well, we haven't thought about that yet. Well, put a big one in. See, a great big one with Luigi Rossi Jr. on it. If you do that, you can take a land. You can have it all. It's true. You're Rossi. Are you sure you want to do this? Yeah. It may be crazy, but I'm sure.  You can get the papers ready. Goodbye, Mr. Rossi. And God love you. Thanks. Say, uh, if you need some dough, I can give you a short thing and a fifth. But, uh... Yeah? No. No, you better skip it. Goodbye. Goodbye. Well, here's the deal, sister. Hold on to it tight. Oh, God is good to me. We have our land. And once again, the sister Margaret and sister Scholastica call to the residence of young information, the songwriter. Come in, won't you, sister? Oh, thank you. Oh, this is my fiance, Miss Blaine. How do you do? And my agent, Mr. Sheldon. How do you do? And congratulate me, sisters. I've just accepted a big, fat offer from Hollywood. From Hollywood? Well, it's only for 12 weeks, but I'm leaving tonight. Oh, which reminds me, I, uh... I want you to have this. It's a little contribution to the church. Thank you, Mr. Mason. Oh, that's much better. That's much better.  You think of, uh, so, Mr. Mason. That's nothing at all. Well, we... We won't intrude on your last meeting at home. We only came to thank you for the deed. Oh, use it any time you want to. As long as you're here. Oh, that's very kind of information. Thank you again. And these are your eyes, Mr. Mason. Thank you. Good night, sister. Good night. Good night, sister. Tell us something really very nice about those two. Oh, they're very sweet, darling. And I'm glad I gave them one. Besides, you can take it off your income tax. No! How about running through that song of yours? What? A bling? Oh, but it's wonderful, Bob. It's the best song you've ever written. Oh, and I'm glad you think so. Now, while you were out this morning, Sister Margaret called from Bethlehem. I wish I could change my decision about helping the Monsignor, but... I can't. Helping them, Your Excellency? Uh, here is her message. First, they have the land they wanted, and Mr. Rossi gave it to them. Rossi gave it to them? Second, they have already raised $300. Incredible. And lastly, they have bought a building. What a building? An active Providence sister said. An old plant had joined in the Rocky property, formerly used to bottle witch hazel. I know the place, Your Excellency. It's small, but there's... Bought a building? But how? With what? $50, she said. At least that represents a three-month option. The full price is $5,000. Sister Margaret said it will make an ideal temporary shelter in hospital until the new edifice is built. Monsignor? Something tells me that an irresistible force has been let loose in New England. Arrange for a car at once. Thank you, Your Excellency. Uh, do you mind? Thank you, Miss Potts. Now, then, sister, on my way here, I went over that building carefully. Well, I must admit it's a bargain. No doubt about it. $5,000, you say? Yes, Your Excellency. And do you look? Only last month they were asking $30,000 for that old buckling plant. Oh, $30,000? Do you have the option paper, sister? Oh, right here, Your Excellency. There. And all in order and sign before a notary. Hmm, yes. Well, now I understand. Do you realize what this agreement calls for, sister? A trustee. Yes, Your Excellency. It was $25,000. Oh, Mr. Jarman, a real estate man was most charitable. And it's good for things you like to receive. Sisters, a trustee is not charity. A trustee is a mortgage. A mortgage? Well, to put it plainly, you have to pay for it. It does not pay you. Very sorry? You see, sister, the price of the building is not $5,000, but $30,000. $30,000? And since such a sum is out of the question, I shall attempt to recover your $30 from Mr. Jarman and have the option canceled. Oh, no, please, Your Excellency. Please, let us try to raise the money practical. Sister Margaret, how can you? Well, I am practical, Your Excellency. We have the land and we have the building. Very practically. And we have $300. And so we're going to have more and more because we're planning to buy a bell. A bell? Yes. What can you do with a bell? We shall begin by ringing it, Your Excellency. Sisters, you believe that all you have to do to raise $5,000 in the United States is to ring a bell? Well, you see, it will draw attention to the leases and the jams and the cakes that we shall offer for sale.  Oh, our pottery was much in demand in Francis' city because I think he is an expert on it. Oh, thank you. And I just... Your cooks were also very much admired. Oh, thank you, Sister. Yes, they were, Your Excellency. But it's impossible for you two to raise anywhere nearly the amount required by selling these, see? We shall also have the help of the others. Others? Yes. What others? Well, the other sisters who promised to come over and help us. How many sisters? Eleven, if you like, Princess. And don't call for Father Barrow, if I say so. Eleven? Please? Oh, dear, Miss Potts, he won't cause you any trouble. He's happy anywhere. He's in a constant... Don't worry, Miss Potts, they will not come. I shall cable it once and put a stop to this... this migration. And you, Sister, must prepare to leave. Yes, Your Excellency. I'm sorry, this is my final word on the subject. About her. About the cable, Your Excellency. Yes? I... I'm afraid it may be too late. Yes. Listen. There are cartons. And he'll always... Sister Margaret! Oh, Sister Scholastica! Father Barrow! Miss Potts. Oh, dear, oh dear, dear. Oh, God will bless you for giving them shelter. Yes, but where would he let me pay? Sister Margaret? Well, I'm sorry, Your Excellency, but they arrived sooner than I had expected. You see, they were just so eager to help at the hospital. Very well, Sister. They are here. But I want you to understand that you may remain only for the period of your option, three months. If by then you have failed to raise the necessary money, or are unable to sustain yourself, you will all have to leave. Is that clear? Yes, Your Excellency. And thank you. God bless you. Sister Scholastica! And you, Miss Potts. Yes? And here is the stable for us, Miss Potts. Oh, Potts, Your Excellency. Against which, quite obviously, there is no defense. There hasn't been for nearly 2,000 years. Well, well, well, well, well, well. Hello, Anthony. Well, it's good to see you.  Anthony, these friends of mine are going to stay with us for the weekend. Well, this is it, everybody. This is my little, great home in New England. Bob, how lovely. No wonder you don't want to go to New York. What a layout. Well, Kitty, the old place, it looks good, doesn't it? Wonderful, darling. What's up over there? Oh, that's just a duck, Miss Kitty. Just a little duck. I better get the bags inside. Just a minute, Anthony. Who's that nun? The one chasing the duck. Got me, boss. Oh, nuns, look alike to me. I better get the mice and the girls and the mice to drink. And look down that road. Three of them, riding bicycles. They're away with me, boss. Come on, assistant! Just a minute, Anthony. What's going on around here? Who are all those nuns?  Just a minute. It's a stable. How many of them? Never did count them, boss. I better get you folks checked. And don't disappear, Anthony. I want to talk to you. Tied up four. It's all right, Arson. It's all right, old boy. Now, what's the idea, Anthony, turning up Arson? All the room time, boss. Room time. Get your hands off of him. Now, what's he tied up for? Well, his ribs are all thin. And he's running away. Well, why shouldn't he run? No, boss, no. In here, everybody, if you want to drink. Anthony's the best bartender this side of... Oh, really? Come on, come on, Arson! Arson, Arson, come back here. That dog just fell his right over the sofa and out the window. Anthony, what's the matter with that dog? You want to see the squirrel, boss? And what's that racket? That bell? You mean that little bit of ringing sound, boss? I mean that inferno's din. What is it? Oh, yes, a bell belonging to the sisters. Excuse me, boss, bell. What are the sisters doing with a bell? Ringing the customers, boss. Customers? For what? The little things they say about them. Down where? At Miss Park? That's right, boss. Bob, look at that crowd over there. Automobiles here. I'm terribly sorry, everybody. Excuse me, will you? I've got to go see what this is all about. Hello, Amelia. I hope to interrupt your painting, but... No, Arson. Hello, here, Amelia. What could I be of taking those nuns in behind my back? Behind your back? What do you learn to read here? Exactly. You moved those nuns in while I was away. The place was flooded with them. I knew them.  You've got to get rid of them, Amelia, the whole process. No, job it. I'm surprised at you. They're going to give the hospital for six children. They'd work and slave inside their pen. Now, see here, Amelia. You've got to get rid of them, or you'll have to leave yourself. As a matter of fact, no one's going to move. They're going to move themselves to the mouth.  Well, no. Why didn't you say so in the first place? Oh, that's different. What are you moving to? There. There? There. There? There? You mean your bottling plant? It's where they used to make the case of. But that's why the cost met the road for my place. They can't put a hospital there. I won't stand for it. Oh, you won't, won't you? No, I won't. Another big aid, Mr. Dahman. Four thousand nine hundred and sixty dollars. They're only property, and there's nothing you can do about it. No, we're just you wait and see. What are you into? We are using your kitchen table for our accounting desk. We are figuring out how to pass the seats. The information finder and the file team is looking for you. Oh, he's finally alright.  We must tell him our good news. Good news? Yes, indeed. Look at this. Hello. Jam, patties, laces, embroideries, eggs, milk and cheeses and other items have brought us just over two thousand dollars. Is that correct, Father Bill? Two thousand one hundred and ninety eight dollars and seventy five nineteen. Thank you, Father. And then there's our hook rug of your design and of the q-share. Thank you. Which was so generously purchased by Mrs. Spooner for twenty two hundred dollars. And now that brings our total up so far, including contributions to, now let me see. Four thousand five hundred and forty five nineteen. Yes. But that isn't enough, isn't it? Oh, but we only have five hundred dollars more. That's as easy as it is. By noon tomorrow? Oh, no, of course not, Mrs. Spooner. Tomorrow? Yes. Oh, no, I can't be. You must be mistaken, Mrs. Potts. It was a good fifteen months ago tomorrow. I remember the day so well. You can't be. I mean, the time has just flown by. We've been working so hard and... Oh, now five hundred dollars to raise in one day. It might as well be a million. Perhaps Mr. Rossi? No, no, no, Sister. We mustn't ask him again. And anyway, you remember he sent us a postcard.  What's his name again? Gaine Neubos. Oh, Sister, I just can't believe it was him. We must have lost something undone. But perhaps we have lost hard enough of... Oh, I don't know. Perhaps it's because we may admit it to dig the foundations for the small triumph on the hill. Of course, Sister, that's it. And that was my fault, because I don't like to do it. If I only had the money, I'd gladly know your witness, Potts. We know your witness. You, Sister, tomorrow morning at dawn, we'll start building our shrine. Yes. And then we'll call Mr. Jarman and ask him for a re-expansion. It's a little time he's sure to agree. Oh, don't you think? I'm sure he will. I think he will. Well, Father, are we finished? Hello, Mr. Jarman. Yes? Oh, hello, Mr. Jarman. This is Mason, Robert Mason. Oh, hello, Mr. Mason. I heard you were back. I'll say about that old building across from me, Mr. Jarman. I understand those nuns have an option on it. Oh, yes, yes, they do. It expires at noon tomorrow, and I have an idea they're not going to be able to pick it up. You don't say. Well, what if we ask for an extension? I'm sorry, Mr. Mason, but I'll have to refuse them. Oh, don't be sorry. Now, you're sure you won't give them any more time? Oh, I think they have a very worthy cause, but after all, this is business. Uh, there's someone else who wants that property. Well, that's all I wanted to know. Thanks a lot, Mr. Jarman. When Sister Margaret and her fellow nuns are most certainly due to lose the little building they've tried so desperately to buy. In the Mason home, Bob and his weekend guests are gathered around the town. Yeah, Bob, congratulations. Thanks. Nearly the first tune you'll have are written. Did you hear that, Bob? And that's a little music critic, too. Wait a minute. Am I hearing things? Listen. What's the matter? Well, sir, singing. Yes, I know. They're singing. Wait a minute. I want to hear it. Now, just a minute. Are you accusing me of listening to that tune? It's been done before, but I wrote my song long before those numbers ever came here. Oh, well, be saying. Just saying. That's very much alive. I wrote this number originally a couple of weeks after my outfit had landed in France near Belair. I was walking through a free field when it came to me just as clearly as if I'd heard it. In Belair, four years ago. And what they're singing was written over 1,400 years ago. A Gregorian playing champ. You think I'd be low enough to slather him from nuns? Oh, no. God, just leave me alone. Oh, forget it, Bob. Come on, let's go. All the while, get some rest. Go ahead. I'll see you all later. And this isn't otherwise. Oh, no, Sister Margaret. What more lovely place could there be? Good. There are lots of places that are in spite. There. Now drive it in, sister, and drive it deep. Are you going back? Oh, yes. Yes, you're doing very well, sister. Now she does some more glades, and I see she's here. She's here now. The others. She looks like the others. Come to my room. Please stop. Anthony. Anthony. You calling me Bob? Where have you been? Bob. I thought you said you were going to take a shower. I said where have you been? Been watching America, Bob. If you've never seen one before, you better go right down and see one now. What are you talking about? Up down the hill. Balls are the steam of water shooting pretty deep in the air. And it came to the sisters that they were digging a hole to put up a sign. Digging up. No wonder I couldn't take a shower. They just took my water pipe. Water pipe? Yes. That's right. My water pipe. Then that settles this. Get the chief Anthony. I'm going into Bethlehem. I came to see you, Mr. Jarman, just to make sure about the sale of the old bottling plant. The information I told you, the sisters often expire at noon today. Yes, I know you did. You also said something about selling it to somebody else. Are you sure you've got a customer for this? You did, I have. Real reliable seller, too. I'm going to put up a fertilizer plant. Fertilizer. What did you say? Fertilizer plant. We tried to build it in town, but the counter wouldn't let in. Fume, you know. What about moon? I live right across from the plate. How much did this fertilizer fellow offer you? $31,000. $32,000? I think we could make a deal, Mr. Mason. Providing, of course, the sisters don't pay $500 in the next two hours. All right, then. Come over this afternoon with the papers, and I'll give you a check. Yes, it seemed to apologize to Ms. Blair for breaking this water pipe. It was more than careless stuff. Well, don't worry about it. The drum is fixing it now. And Mr. Mason? You'll be back soon. You'll be back in town about something.  Oh, we've been playing, sister. But Ms. Lane and I know when to quit. These two just beat us to a pulp.  Right at any time you are out. Excuse me, but do you really mean that? Mean what?  Perhaps it's a donation to a good cause for the opportunity to defeat the lady under gentlemen? Well, uh, well, yes, maybe not a small fortune, but, uh... Oh, would you consider $500? Less than a small fortune? Well, yes, I thought so. But it was $500. Why? Uh, would you excuse me, please, while I talk to Sister? What do they have to, anyway? I don't get all this money. We'll bring it back. But it's been so long. Oh, I know, but it is a solution. Okay. May I see your racket, please, please? My racket? Sure. And your shoes? A good, good, very sweet. More borrowed then? Well, well, yes, but what for? Well, it is agreeable to everyone. Sister Scholastica would like to be this gentlemen's partner in a tennis match. You, my partner? Yes. Please. And if you insist on a win, you will donate $500. Sure. Well, well, what do you say? Two, that's not a three. Okay, brother. Okay, by me. You, uh, you played tennis before. Oh, yes. But not for a very long time, I must say. Now, don't try to run out on it, Al. Come on. What are you on here, Kitty? Isn't she marvelous, Bob? That's Sister Scholastica out there. Hello, Mr. Mason. You came to tell you how sorry you were about the water pipe. Well, forget it. Get the all fixed. Oh, thank you. Your necessary kind of offer to donate $500 to be insisted Scholastica should win the tennis match. You, you mean we're going to get $500 from him? Wow, quiet, darling. That's a nice point. That's Aunt Matt. Oh, Aunt Waterless. Oh, sister, you're marvelous. Oh, but we lost. I am so ashamed. Sorry, why?  Where did you learn to play like that, sister? Oh, yes, you were wonderful. Oh, Norman was in. I was not wonderful. You remember, perhaps, justly my laugh of the 1969 French team? Do I? You're not just normal. Norman was in. No longer. I lost, Mr. Margaret. I lost. You tried, sister. That's important. Mr. Mason? I know this isn't the right moment, and you've been so good to us already, but we were wondering... I know all about it, sister, and the answer is no. I'm sorry, but I just don't want a hospital temporarily permanent in my backyard. I'm sorry, sister, but that's the way I feel. Yes, of course. Well, thank you anyway, Mr. Mason. Come, sister, we've got to go back now. So we must go back to France, Miss Potts. But we want you to know that you have our everlasting prayers and gravities. But, sister Margaret... Oh, no, no, we haven't failed. That is not in God's plan, we haven't. Even though we don't understand it right now. If I'm ever something I could do, for the first time in my life, I know how it feels to be poor. Poor? Oh, my dear Miss Potts. You're not poor.  You're rich, and kind, and some greatness of heart, and in taste.  You know, it isn't hard to relinquish a dream. It is God's will.  And since you all seem so furious as to why I'm in the town, all right, I'll tell you why. I'm buying that old plant across the way. Oh, no, what are you gonna do with it, Bob? Make with Hazel? You don't approve, do you? None of you approve. Well, you may as well hear all of us. Those nuns didn't have the money to meet the options, so I moved in, just in time, too. Bob, I don't understand. Progress, Kit, progress. Don't you recognize the merits of a bottling plant over a children's hospital? I seem to recall the city wanting to build a playground in your neighborhood, and the moment you heard about it, you got people to sign a petition against it. Maybe I did, but... That was just sure. That was different because it happened to you.  Finally, you get the break. You build your house. You think a lot of though into it, and along comes somebody who wants to build a hospital right in your front yard. Would you stand for it? Would any of you stand for it? I know how you feel, Bob, but those sisters are doing a very worthy thing. Yes, I know, and I'm all for it. I'm for a lot of worthy things, orphan asylums, insane asylums, sanitariums, but I'm just like everybody else. I don't run right under my nose, and I'm honest enough to say so. Give them all a drink, Kit. I'm going off to school. Come and say goodbye to us. No, I... I was just asked for a walk. I didn't mean to break in on you. When are you leaving? Tomorrow. Something you need? A station wagon with a jeep. Oh, thank you. But there's nothing you need. Oh, but you have fainted to walk. Just a scholasticer now. We're coming over to your house to do this. What's that? Well, it's for money, Kit. We won't be needing it now, and it's only right that you should have it back. All right. I don't want it back. Can't you move it for something? To help you pay your expenses home. Oh, that's very kind of you, too, but I wouldn't be taking care of it by our mother house in Gilaire. G... Gilaire? Yes. In... in France? Malmondville? Yes. Do you know it? Yes, I... I know it. Oh, how nice. Sister, I... I'd like to do something. I... Isn't there... isn't there anything? Yes, Mr. Masonary. Could you say a prayer for her? Well, I'm... I'm afraid prayers aren't very much of my line. I'm not... I'm not very good at that sort of thing, but... I'd better be able to please you. Oh, it will. And it'll do. Why, this paper is the deed to the building. And the bill of sale, marked paid in full. She came here last night there, Mr. Mason. He said a prayer for her. He must have come back later, much later. We found the deed when we came to Mass there this morning. Oh, please, Your Excellency. You know we saw it. And we're proud to do it.  And now, I, too, should like to pray for you. Now here's Mr. Keely with our cars. And here they are coming forward for an extra curtain call. Loretta Young and you, Ma. It's a special excitement when you're in the Lutz Radio Theatre, just think. This is your 26th appearance. Yes, well, it's always exciting for me, too, Bill. And tonight was a, well, a favorite role of mine. And one for what you received in the Academy Award nomination last year. Your last week was pretty exciting in Hollywood, too. March 20th brought a new batch of Academy Award winners and their Oscars. And March 21st brought Spring, Folk, and Molossi.  Now, let's call it so for beauty care. What do you need are those daily looks so facial for a radiant complexion? Well, you ought to know, Loretta. You're one of our best recommendations for beauty. You, I think, you might be out of touch with what's going on in Hollywood. Well, I suppose I am a little bit. I spent several months making a picture in South America. But since then, returning, I've had time to finish one called Wait till the Sun shines in LA. Oh, that sounds like one of those wonderful 20th Century Fox musicals in Kutnik, Loretta. Ah, and incidentally, Loretta, don't miss the latest release called Five Fingers. Five Fingers? That sounds like the life of a one-eyed blinder. Ah, no, Loretta. Those are the five fingers of a spy played by James Mason, who uses them to steal war secrets from the British. Oh, yes, Bill. I remember ringing it. And it was all the more exciting because it actually happened. Right. And what story do you have for next week, Bill? Well, one that can actually happen every day, you. Because it's a romantic drama set to the background of New York's fabulous models and designers, and as timely as today's fashion headlines. It's I Can Get It For You wholesale.  Oh, I shall love listening to that, Bill. Good night. Good night. Good night. And thanks for two beautiful performances. And now here's John Kennedy with news about another star performer. This is a company unconditionally guaranteeing the quality and performance of Luxe toilet folk, Luxe place, Trotterdon Tuesday, that's presented on this program for your money refund. Now we invite you to be with us again next Monday evening. When the Luxe Radio Theatre presents Susan Hayward and Dan Daly, Jim, I Can Get It For You wholesale. This is William Keely saying good night to you from Hollywood. Tonight we're glad to call him the singer-stylastica. Ruth Barrett is Ms. Pot, Bill Johnstone is the Bishop, Luigiin Haiderzal and Scatman Crutters is Anthony. Our play was adapted by SH Barnett and our music was directed by Rudy Schrager. This is your announcer, John Milton Kennedy, reminding you to join us again next Monday night to hear I Can Get It For You wholesale.


So let's uh, let's see who wanted to be first. I think Naby O'Fami wanted to be first. There you go, floor is yours Thank you. Thank you very much. I'm not sure I wanted to be you Yeah, he offered nobody wanted to be first. That's the point Kindly offer let me first thank Terry for the kind invitation to be back here It's always been a very informative event for me. I've learned a lot from many of the panels. I want to also start by repeating what you just said a Month ago or a little bit more when I first got the invitation to come Looked at the topic and I frankly would have given you a completely different presentation Because as an Egyptian Looking westwards. I see a failed state on my right in Libya. I see a failed state in Sudan southwards Was no peace process. There was no there was no violence But there's no peace process looking eastwards between the Palestinians and the Israelis Syria is still coming out of a nightmare and then all the way down to Yemen and the tensions with Iran there were a lot of problems I Won't focus on any of them, but let me simply say that I actually expect what happened in In Gaza They have negative effects on all of these Because on the one hand there is clearly a Regionalization of conflicts in the region with the major powers Trying to figure out what role they want to play and there's going to be an opportunity or players in all of these conflict conflicts Try to get as much more leverage of their positions than in the past when We weren't focused on the Gaza issue second point I'd make is And I've gone horse trying to make this over the years Is never assumed that the Arab Israeli conflict is over Only because there's no active bloodshed occurring And it's something that we kept hearing over and over again. The Palestine issue is not important It's not a pressure point. It's not a priority It always breaks out unless we solve the problem between Arabs and Israelis The question will never be Whether or not there will be violence it will be when is the next cycle of violence Whether it's on the previous conflicts I mentioned or on the most recent conflict countries in the region have to Have better governance and when I mean that I mean not only domestically and regionally but also in terms of respect for international law in their international relations unless that becomes the focus of How we operate and how we move the idea of a balance of power that's always a variant and the problem here is that It's not always a balance of power between nation-states It's a balance of power between who's ready to to cause more damage and more pain on the other side when One looks at what happened recently clearly there is a higher profile for non-state parties and clearly there is an argument being presented. I don't agree with it that irrespective of the issue revenge and Collateral damage in humane color damage is acceptable in order to respond to what is considered to be the initial source of conflict my My point really here is we need to have an Arab Israeli process that leads to Arabs and Israelis living peacefully in the Middle East and at the core of that is the Palestinians and the Israelis That will require an ending of occupation and it will require To be able to have the national identity for Israelis and for the Palestinians in Viable sovereign states I've heard very frequently that Two-state solution is dead or difficult. I Argued it's difficult much more now than in the past. I don't think it's dead and I Know I hope it's not dead because I don't see a one-state solution as A viable alternative to solve the problem One-state solution means that the Israelis and the Palestinians Forgo their desire for a singular national identity and Decide on a common identity between them and I don't see that happening peacefully. It may become a one-state reality But then you will have Continuous conflict between these two peoples because it can't be a reality that ends up giving priority to one state versus the others now let me just for a very few minutes My country started the peace process with Israel after embarking on a war which was intentionally started with the Explained objective of starting negotiations. That's I'm talking about the 73 war And we were the first to sign a peace agreement that being said even back then in the 70s part of our agreement with the Israelis had a framework agreement for To create a threshold for an agreement between Palestinians and Israelis What happened in the last five weeks four weeks is Really going to the core of Arab-Israeli hatred and anger and if we start to light that fire again We will all pay a very severe price for it nation states as Angry as they may be have to respect international law have to respect international humanitarian law and including the laws that govern war and We need to go back to trying to establish a two-state solution now. Is that possible now? I'll sum it up in Very few words We need to deal on an emergency basis with a crisis management situation the continuous deaths of civilians every day Destruction of Gaza About 25 if not 30 percent completely destroyed cannot be the basis for Relationship between Arabs and Israelis or every combatant That is killed you are planting the seeds for 10 more who have lost family and will want revenge and retribution in the future so The we need to get a ceasefire not for the ceasefire's sake but just to control the Viciousness of the combat with the objective of ultimately then moving on to a conflict resolution phase Which has to be essentially a two-state solution. I would argue that this requires an Arab initiative We need to take the issue in our own hands and it also requires responsibility of the major states Globally be there the Americans. I just came from China the Chinese or anybody else to go back to How do we bring the parties the Israelis and the Palestinians in particular back to negotiating table if they don't believe in the end result This is be my closing comment Having done these negotiations for most of my career. This is not the best time to start this project By any standard whether and whether it's respect to the leadership paradigm on the Palestinian side or the Israeli side but we can't afford not to and I therefore suggest that Dealing with the crisis situation is imperative, but then What we need to put to the Israeli and Palestinian Center to the public Is not an interim solution We need to actually offer them. What are the elements in as much detail as we can of closure Where will the two-state solution actually be? How do we deal with the different components of that and that will ultimately? achieve For Palestinians what they want in terms of national state and it will achieve for the Israelis What they are even calling for in the midst of combat, which is security for Israelis in the future, so let me just throw out those two points. This is not the time for continued violence there were planting the seeds of Non-state party violence for the future and it's not the time for incremental proposals Because they aren't enough to bridge the pain and get over what's happened over the last few weeks. Thank you very much Now be a family think thank you very much You've touched on a number of points, which I'm sure we're going to be picking up on over the next hour or so What's what came through for me most importantly? It's not just an Israeli Palestinian issue There's the Arab Israeli issue that needs to be addressed as well And there may be room within this and seeking solutions and in these processes that you've Suggested need to be pushed forward. There may be a role for other actors outside the region from around the world To play a diplomatic role. Thank you very much


This is an abstract argument which just goes through unchanged.  So the arguments saying that s plus u go homology, the kernel of s plus u is q go homology, and the same is the arguments that we used for the kernel of s being q1 go homology. Those arguments completely abstract in general. That was the advantage of being the abstract. The new argument that we got is that we got exactly compute q1 go homology, meaning the kernel of s, because that was the trivial. And finally, one was the map between the kernel of s and the kernel of s plus u. What is the top-list of the actual interest of the argument being the kernel of s plus u? Well, we just done it, so it will be short. Do you know that these states are 0? That was identity by s. When you follow the state side, that's identity by s plus u. The reverse constructions are also true. But the same reason is you can write s is s plus q minus u. And the same thing goes for s. Same. Basically, this map that we have between kernels is very general property of lower triangular matrices. This is the lower triangular matrix. This is lower triangular in the sense of under eigenvalue of nsc, because u is a negative eigenvalue of nsc. So the kernel of a lower triangular matrix is isomorphic to the kernel of its time limit. Let's just see that to cross the matrix. Yes, suppose we know the policy. We know that because I get that is 0 here. Actually, it's going to seem trivial if you promise to cross the thing, but let me just say it. Suppose we have 0 again. So what's the kernel of this matrix? It's a one-dimensional kernel, and the kernel is all in the elements of the form half star z. Now, if you have 0, 8, b, and a is not equal to 0, then this is lower triangular. And the matrix diagonal thing was invertible apart from in this 0 rock. This is the structure we had, remember? x was invertible outside the 0 eigenvalue. Then it's clear that this element's no longer the kernel, but you can find more kernel elements. Because in order for, let's look at alpha beta. So let's see. So 0, 0, the first addition gives you nothing, the second addition gives you b alpha plus m beta is equal to 0. Now, it's not true anymore that you can choose beta equal to 0, but beta is, you choose somehow, then beta is determined by b alpha by the minus. So it's a is not equal to 0. So if you've got a lower triangular matrix, such that in this region, the space where you have no 0 is here, though. All elements in the lower triangular are like this. Suppose you've got a matrix of this structure, but these are zeros. This is really zeros of any any diagonal matrix, zeros, zeros, a and b. Then there's one to one map between the kernel of this matrix and the kernel of the operator a. And that's exactly what we've done. You see, this operator a is 0 is s. a is 0, b, blah, blah, blah is s. It's a larger idea in a sense. We're using an eigenbasis of n and c now, where this b comes down here. It changes the, it changes the eigenvalues of n and c. Okay, so you can just think of this in terms of matrices. In that sense, it's totally obvious. So this abstract construction in sets of matrices is just an entirely obvious statement. Is this clear? Then there's an isomorphism between the kernels. Okay, there's one more thing that I want to remind you of and that is that, okay. So we have therefore concluded that the, we've concluded two things. First, we've concluded that the cohomology of q is equal to the kernel of q plus s, of s plus u. We've concluded that the kernel of s plus u is isomorphic to the kernel of s, which was equal to the correctional space. Like, good quantization. There's one more thing we have to worry about. That's enough. But let's worry about that. What I want to clarify is, now, suppose we build this map, I have a cleaner product between psi and let's say we've got psi 1 and psi 2. Let's call this, let's call this guy. The cleaner product between psi 1 and psi 2, okay. It's impossible to have non-zero, you know, a contribution cleaner product from, if you have two states, both of which have nlc equals 0. And some operator in the middle, it just has a negative value of nlc. Just because you won't be able to, you can try it. You won't be able to eat up all the oscillators. Some of the oscillators left over, which are annihilated one at a time, one at a time. Okay? So, when you try to compute the inner product between psi 1 and psi 2, all terms are going to be used. The only term that survives is equal to, we not only have produced a map, that's, you know, an isomorphism between states, we've actually, in fact, produced a map that respects the inner product. I understand that it could be proportional. No, no, but with this one, it's exactly equal. Because everything else is just 0. Of course, we could have made a proportion by changing this constant to something else, but multiplying itself. With this choice of 1, with this one, it's equal to, now the loco is filled with the strongest form. That is, states in Kyoko homology are one-to-one map with the states of the Lycone oscillator, the states of the Lycone quantization, transverse oscillations of the spring, and all states in Kyoko homology have positive derivative. Would you know what happens if there's some operation of psi 1 and psi 2? Yeah. Okay, now, you see, that would require us to specify what an operator does have. Yes. That's a different level of, at the moment we're just looking at the inward space. We do have to worry about that. Let me look at strings, cap and amplitudes. Okay, but let's not be so ambitious. The result shows you the power of abstract mathematicalism. You know, I mean, if you were actually to enumerate this Kyoko homology level by level, let's say, it's actually, it's quite beautiful. But after mathematical reasoning, it can sometimes give you very powerful results.  Well, one should take that too far. You know, it can be very useful sometimes. It's a very important thing. Okay, so, you know, the problem, of course, is that it keeps getting interrupted. Next Friday, there's a department meeting at 2 o'clock. You guys have an alternate time you could find. Maybe it's, okay. We might try to come up with an alternate time offline, otherwise we won't have time. So can I just take 15 minutes more now? Okay, we just keep getting interrupted, so it looks less than we've ever been given. And of course, those who want to leave, please go ahead. Okay, let me just take 15 minutes more just to talk about the remaining things I wanted to talk about today. It could be the next time we meet the next Wednesday. Don't get too far. Okay, now, the next thing I want to do that I want to tell you about, the next thing I want to tell you about is about an explicit construction of states in cubo. You might say this is pretty explicit, and it is explicit, but it involves this inversion of, you know, this action of one minus X inverse U S inverse. Well, this is really explicit, because it involves acting with software that is used by a lot of people. But it's explicit. It won't be totally museum. It's a more explicit characterization of states in cubo quality. It's a way that covariant quantization makes contact with what's called the old canonical quantization. Just one of the first ways in which covariant quantization of the state was done in analogy with the thumb law of quantization of electrical analytics. So it's a useful thing to keep in mind in that I don't know how I did it. Before I... So in order to get to that, in order to get to that, I want to tell you about one property. I'm going to tell you about one property of the states that were constructed by this construction. And the property is that these states all have zero eigenvalues under the operator 2n minus plus n is C plus n. So take... Consider the operator that counts the number of... the number of... twice the number of minus oscillators plus the number of C oscillators plus the number of B oscillators. Okay? The state can be constructed by this construction always zero eigenvalue under this operator. This is the k. This is the k that I have. Let's first count... Let's first count the eigenvalues of... Let's first compute the eigenvalue of r. Let's remember r.  With this n index here being negative, that creates one B oscillator but it destroys one minus oscillator because we have alpha with a plus of n. Alpha plus with a plus of n. It destroys a minus oscillator. So, such term is the value of minus. Is that clear? Because it has minus equals minus 1 and then B equals 1. On the other hand, we also have terms where this index goes negative. In that case, it creates a plus oscillator so it doesn't carry any n minus. But if this index is negative, this index is positive but destroys the C oscillator and therefore nC goes negative. It is minus 1. In both cases, we have this quantity in performance. So again, r is the eigenvalue that's the statement. And it's easier to see what you get. See how much it will add to the eigenvalue of the state if you add it a bit. That's how we can do the computation. We can do it by doing the computing. So r is eigenvalue minus 1 under that. Now, what about what about now I'm interested in q0 and q1? In the same way, in the same way q1 has eigenvalue easily checked at the time because of this directly check that s has eigenvalue 0 under this eigenvalue. Okay? Well, what about q0 and q1? q0 and q minus 1 have terms of all kinds of values of r or all kinds of values of this operator but there is no there is no term in either q0 or q minus 1 that has eigenvalue greater than plus 1 under this operator. This is my case. Now, the easiest way to check this is to try to produce a function. You know, it's going to be important for what I say that this is true. That there is no double eigenvalue 2 or 3 years. So the easiest way to check this is to try to try to produce a contradiction. So you see, the place where you might most easily be able to produce a contradiction is to raise an n minus by a large one. But that's as you get because of this factor too. So maybe we should be looking at the path in c. The path that is c minus m alpha plus minus alpha minus minus n alpha plus m plus n is as written as positive. Now that would raise n minus by 1. This is a contribution to q. Yeah, this is a contribution to q. This is not q0 by this one. But depending on what the values of m and n is, it's q0. Because it has to be your selector. It could be a company training. I'm going to say that in all of q, there is no term with the value of this operator being larger than 1. Okay? In particular, we know that it's 1 for q1 but there's nothing that's larger. Okay, so see, suppose n goes positive. Then this piece would raise this quantity by 2. That must mean that this operator is our creation. Because the sum of the indices adds to 0. Okay? Suppose this guy was a destruction operator. Then it would be destroying a minus of it. So it leads out to benefit of having this creation operator. It would be a creation operator but it's just an ideal value 1. The pieces in which you get this one would be ideal value 1 from this kind of creation, this kind of destruction then this cancels and you get 1 for k. All you would have had this kind of creation, this kind of creation, this kind of destruction. This kind of creation, this kind of creation, this kind of destruction. This creation just creates a plus operator that doesn't enter this operator. This creates a minus 1. This is ideal value plus 2 but this, because it's destruction gives you an extra minus 1. Example all the terms. You can convince yourself that there is no problem with ideal value larger than 1 of this operator. Any value which you have to compute are ideal value minus 1 and the queue who has ideal value ignores equal to 1. So u has ideal value less than equal to 0 under this operator. It's number of numbers plus number plus number. At size 0, the states of the kernel of s have zero ideal value because there is zero ideal value under n plus n minus n c d m b. Therefore, the states that we get by acting with the series x divided by zero ideal value under this operator. Therefore, the states that we get by acting with 1 plus s u inverse plus s u inverse, all of that is zero ideal value under this operator because the ideal value is less than or equal to the ideal value of the state that we start with and there is no ideal value less than zero. But the construction that we have here is the state in the kernel of this operator. It's the state. Taking that u has ideal value less than equal to 0, does it mean that u has ideal value 0 because of the series? You can have destruction operators. An operator can have under this operator. A state cannot. Let me repeat the argument. u has negative ideal value under this operator. So, the states i zero and zero ideal value under the operator s has zero ideal value. Negative or zero.  The ideal value of the state must be less than or equal to zero. But the operator on that state is about to change u. So, the paths which have negative u, much like it covers a lot of destruction of it. What is the inverse u which has negative ideal value? Which has either zero or pieces that are zero and pieces that are zero. There is no singularity of the s and u zero ideal. The state we are looking at is well defined. That will be already out. What about the state being well defined? It is just a question of what the ideal value of the state is under this operator. The ideal value is less than zero. The state with ideal value is less than zero. So, the state with ideal value is equal to zero. We conclude that all our states, all the states that we have got by this construction obeying the condition n minus on size equal to zero and z on size equal to zero and b on size equal to zero. What we focus on is these two things. Not only does that exist, not only have we characterized the co-mology, we have also shown that there is a representative of the co-mology that is made up entirely out of the meta-oscillators of the state. Because if this representative is an operator, next 10 minutes, next 5, 10 minutes, we are going to study states we are going to study states of this form. We are going to study the states of the form, states that are in the c and b vacuum. So, we are going to map the states but c and b vacuum. Can you say what the condition of the co-mology is less than zero? Size and exact, create an exact only with transverse oscillators and plus oscillators. And the point is how many plus of what? Given the transverse oscillator structure, the plus oscillator structure is different. It is not independent. You know, that is because the state will only transverse oscillators and the rest of the plus oscillators will put it in the co-mology of q. It is possible to do that. So, we are going to study states of this form. So, we are going to study states of this form. We are going to study the state that is in the b c cos vacuum. And we act on it with q. What does it mean for the state to be q closed?  Choose m to be, let's call it minus m. If we choose m to be negative, we have a c-destruction which analyzes states of this form. So, if we concentrate on states of this form, states that are in the b and c cos vacuum, then we only get contributions from anything positive.  So, c minus m and c. So, c minus m just acts on the cos vacuum. This must be c0 if the state is to be in q-co homology. Therefore, the state must be annihilated by the matter part of the state. But for positive n, for positive n, but actually including c0 because c0 on psi is not c. Okay? So, we conclude that if we are interested in states of q-co homology of the form, then any state in the matter but for the field theory, times bc cos vacuum, then l m on psi must be equal to 0 for all n greater than equals. We have to stop taking all the states of the vacuum. We still have to model the area 0. There is 0 now. Okay? I know. So, we've constructed the state of q-co homology. You see, this is necessary and sufficient for the state to be in q-co homology. I'm sorry, to be q-closed. The states of this form might be q-exact. The states that are q-co homology of this form are states that are annihilated by all l m which is m positive. They are q-exact states. They have 0 in the product. So, we show that any state that is physical, that is annihilated by q and has 0 in the product with all the other states in particular 0 norm must be q-exact. Because we show that within q-co homology we've got a positive definite in the product that it knows where it comes from. The states that are q-closed that are q-exact among these. Physical states, states that are q-closed are states that are various. But not all of these states are in q-co homology because we select and remove the q-exact states. You have to remove the q-exact states, but basically it states of to the total d. The matter. There's also the first part that doesn't continue that kills that kills that power. Because it's the vacuum in the cost apart from a normal order in cost actually because you minus 1 in the vacuum which makes it this l-z of 1. So apart from the normal ordering thing. This one systematically, but an easy way to try to identify all states that are q-exact is to just identify all states that have this form that has 0 norm. What states are q-exact states? Let's try to use the same kind of reasoning that we used for q-co homology. You remember that states that have 0 norm were simply q or something else. Of course we had states that were l-n on some kind. Suppose we have got a psi. Let's compute the inner product of psi with any sizes. Let's call it apis. Let's compute the same. So this is equal to an annihilator physical state. So if you have a state that is a descendant that is l-n of some other state the state can sometimes also be primal. Okay, so let me introduce a problem. States are annihilated by all l-n for ins positive about primal states that are obtained from some other state that are actually of l-n. And positive are called descendant states. Of primal, a descendant. A state that is both primal and a descendant it has 0 norm. And therefore is a q-co homology. It's not q-co homology. It's q-exact. You're basically sure that I won't try to do it. That this is the set of q-exact states of this form. If we're looking just at the matter center then the states that are q-exact are states that are aware of the physical state conditions but are also descended from some other state. Now there's a very pretty structure of representation theory that I've done. Some of you are very familiar with from my study of superconductors. You see when a state goes where in a representation of a form it is both a descendant it's at the head of its own power of representation of the algebra but it's also descended from some other states that are 0 norm states. They should be thought of as pure gage. As we will see in the various examples. Now you have the matter that is varying. The equation of q-co homology is that all states that are primary that ends with n positive. Modular states that are descendants. In q-co homology the descent is down to this little sub-sector. Now I think we've gone on for far too long where I had also planned to do was to work out both q-co homology and this matter-co homology in at lower levels for the state at well to be frank just at the master's level. Can I leave it to you as an exercise and actually hope somebody might do it? I am going to suggest it to you as an exercise and we will very quickly rush through it in the next class and whenever that may be my class may just arrive at the next Wednesday and after that start now turn to a serious study of the properties of the formula we learned today.


I thought it was going to us. I mean, first of all. Well, I don't know either of you, but I've heard you say that. I know. And she's just too many. She's too many. She's too many. I'm just telling you. So, it's very, very weak. It's going to hit. I still have a question. I'm just kidding. Yeah. It's going to hit. Yeah. Yeah. From the beginning. No, it's not going to hit. It's going to hit. It's going to hit. I don't think so. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. Yeah. I know. I'm just kidding. I just want to say that it's wrong here. It's not. It's not a department. It's their, no. It's their. Yeah. Rebellious. It's their. Yeah. It's their. It's their. No. No, it's not. It's their. Okay. No. It's their. No. It's their.


Our next speaker is Tom Welch. For those of you who have the opportunity to travel outside Iowa and participate in these kinds of discussions, you will quickly learn we are blessed to have Tom Welch working in the Iowa DOT here. Thank you, Tom. He reinforces what some of these national studies have been showing on causation of crashes. Rarely is the roadway a contributing factor or even a major factor on fatal crashes. The driver behavior is a major factor, almost two-thirds of all fatal crashes. It is a contributing factor over 90% of the fatal crashes. The roadway is a major factor in less than 5% of contributing factor in a very, very small percentage. So the challenge to us engineers is what can we do? We could build straight, flat roadways in Iowa with perfect sight distances and there will be a high number of the fatalities that are occurring in Iowa continuing to occur. So what we try to do in our profession is to provide a forgiving environment. It is inevitable that there is going to be bad judgment and there is going to be driver error. What we are going to try to do in our profession, the best we can do in our profession, is to provide that forgiving environment so that you do make that mistake that you hopefully can recover from that. So I am just going to show you some of the more recent innovative engineering studies. I could talk here for an hour about all the different engineering strategies we could do and have done. But things that are beginning more popular across the country that other states have taken lead on and discovered and we are implementing here in the other states. As you begin to see in Iowa, if you have been to Missouri, you have seen hundreds of miles of cable median. More distracted drivers, more people going out in those winter weather conditions and bad conditions assisting that they can drive and going off with the medians and going across the medians and causing head-on crashes and fatalities. Distracted driving, we are going to see much more of that. We are just getting the touch of the iceberg. That generation of drivers who insisted and addicted to text messaging is just entering our driving environment. And we are going to see dramatic increase I think in cross-centerline head-on crashes. States such as Michigan and Missouri are saying we are not waiting. Michigan's DOT's chief engineers told all the district engineers you shall install centerline road strips in every two lane highway in the state of Michigan regardless of the pavement condition. I don't care what it does that centerline joint within the next two years. Missouri has put in thousands of miles of this. We have put in several miles in Iowa. We will be putting in more miles, more driven by crash history at this point. But I think you will see this being a very common application again to try to mitigate that distracted driving issue that is out there. We know that not only younger drivers, but drivers my age and older have a very high difficulty crossing and making left-hand turns at high speed multi-lane roadways, expressway systems. Iowa is one of 20 states that has built hundreds and hundreds of miles of roadways that look like interstates except without the interchanges. North Carolina, Maryland has taken the lead on this is building what was called J-turns that prohibit you from going straight across or making a left turn. It makes you make a right turn, go down and make a U-turn through the median and come back and cross into the side road or continue off to your left. Well over 90% effective in reducing all crashes. Very, very controversial. You think roundabouts are controversial. Try to go out in the public in Iowa and explain we're going to build a J-turn. The shoulder paved shoulders have been out there for a long time. We started putting rumble strips out on the interstates. Saw how they're very effective, other states did. Now other states are applying that on all the two-lane roadways. More of the two-lane roadways including Iowa is finally putting paved shoulders. I think we're the last state in the country to put in paved shoulders. But again, you've seen the center there. What Missouri did is Mississippi actually took the one step forward. Mississippi they get a lot of rain. When you get rain, the rain covers the pavement marking. Now pavement marking is consistent not only paint but glass beads. And it is with your headlights that reflect off that glass bead that makes that pavement marking really show up at night. You put water over that little bit of rain. You don't get that reflectivity. You end up driving in a black hole. You've paved the shoulders. You've paved the roadway all black.  So Mississippi came up with the idea, let's move the centerline, edge line to the rumble strip, paints the vertical force to water, can't hide that and you get very positive guidance at night. And what's key is all these things we're talking about here are very relatively low cost. You start doing system-wide. Non-engineering. We've had great success in enforcing seat belts, getting great high percentage of seat belt used in our daytime. Tremendously drops off at nighttime. So what states have been doing including Iowa Department of Public Safety has been increasing our nighttime seat belt enforcement. We need to try to convey to the drivers that there is more risk to this behavior than what they've been seeing in the past and it's getting very challenging with the reduction enforcement officers that are out there. That's the primary challenge we have as professions is the unfortunate thing is that drivers perceive there is greater reward in all this behavior than there is greater risk. And if we don't change that thought process, it's going to be very difficult to do so. The other thing we did in non-injury perspective is when we go out and look at safety challenges, we have not in the past done a very good job of trying to address driver behavior and getting input from the drivers. What the Federal High Administration has been encouraging states to do is to make your studies multidisciplinary, have multidisciplinary people out on your road safety reviews, not just engineers. Another innovative strategy, again very low cost, solution that the Federal High Administration is promoting is when we're resurfacing the roadway, building the roadway, having a vertical drop even though you're going to gravel up there and you know that gravel is going to wear off and have an edge drop, put a small slope on the edge of that roadway that's recoverable, that is forgivable. And that's what we're seeing with all these things is trying to provide a forgiving environment. Our Chief Engineer is leaning towards making this a standard in Iowa. I believe that's the direction he's given our offices. And we'll be part of the first in the country to do this system-wide on the edge of our shoulders. And other states have been doing this. So those are just some of the, you know, new things that are out there trying to address it. And again, I challenge you to, we've already got to look at how do we convey the education experiences to these drivers of their behavior is far greater riskier than what they feel it is and it's more riskier than the war that they perceive they're going to get themselves into. So thank you.


Today, every company is also a software company, and to stay competitive needs to turn ideas into high-quality software quickly. Development teams need an infrastructure to design, develop, test, and deliver applications. Without an agile and flexible infrastructure, the team cannot keep up with the demands of today's business. But physical development and test environments are expensive, and it takes a lot of time to set up and manage servers. The Microsoft Development and Test Solution provides a comprehensive set of software and cloud services that help you deliver applications faster, with less risk to your business. On-demand cloud infrastructure allows developers to react faster to changes and reduces the effort to manage development and test environments. Using the cloud, developers can deliver higher-quality software faster by testing applications in a production-like environment, and in the cloud you only pay for resources you really use, and resources are much cheaper overall. Go to aka.ms-dev-test to learn more, or go to azure.microsoft.com to give it a try.


But there's an important point here if you're not familiar with conservation as a whole. Least concern is the best you can do because they don't want to imply that anything is safe because, I mean, wildfires and climate change, like you've seen the last 10 or 15 years, nothing is safe. So human, least concern. Yep. The ants in your backyard, least concern. Tabletop games, by and large, least concern. It is really hard to make a widely played tabletop game go extinct because if you know the rules, you can recreate the game full stop.


But do you think that a single mother with five children will have to buy a tank of 20.LBG for $70? That that's what we want? I can reduce the subsidies on LBG? Of course we can do it, but we believe that single mothers in particular, lower income households, we can't allow them to pay $70 for a tank of 20.LBG because we can't.