Well, let me thank the organizers for inviting me and giving me the chance to visit Italy, which I haven't been in a very long time, and I guess as I'm the last talk, perhaps we can all thank the organizers who have done a tremendous amount of work and done a terrific job. I want to give my personal thanks to both Mel and Craig for many years of guidance, support, and friendship. So thank you, both of you. I also wanted to point out that we're celebrating their hundred and fiftieth birthday, more or less, this year, and also, if you count from their PhDs, that's a hundred years of mathematics. So those are important things. And then, I guess, following up on Long's desire to speak to the young people, my advice, it's not advice, it's just pointing out that it's okay to be nervous before your talk. It's probably should be expected. I've been doing this a long time, I still get a little nervous. All right, so I want to talk on a paper that's joint with Craig and my student, Thomas Poulstra, on the equality of test ideals. And so let me start with a non-characteristic P question. And I'm going to assume, pretty much, that we're in a complete domain, D is the dimension of R. So let's let I contained in R be a height one and unmixed, okay? And let's set, I'll give it a name so I can refer to it B, sub J, and let's let that be the annihilator over R of the jth local cohomology of R mod I symbolic N, okay? So the question is, how can we control this ideal? All right? So what you can see is that local duality says that the the height, the height of these guys is at least, I guess, D minus J plus one. You need the symbolic power there for that. And so, all right, so of course, if you take, if we take one to be in I, all right, then that tells us that X1 to the N is certainly in this ideal B, sub J, N, all right? But the question, first question that I want to ask is, can we find parameters, come up here, there's my page two, parameters X1, X2, up to X sub, we want to go as far as B minus J plus one in the first one, say, BJ1, such that they're nth powers in this ideal BJN, okay? And the issue is that these, the exponents, these exponents, I mean, there's some exponent that will get you in there, but it's, it's hard to know up priority what those exponents are, okay? So that's, that's our, so I want you to kind of tuck that away and now we'll start the tight closure part of the talk, okay? So for the rest of the talk, I want to assume still that I have this complete domain, but now I'm positive characteristic P and F finite and we've seen this definition lots of times, but R is weakly F regular, if and only if I star equals I for all ideals in R and R is F regular if Rp is weakly F regular for all primes P in spec, okay? And as has been mentioned several times before, there's an example of Brenner and Monsky that we have, so there exists R, a ring, W, a multiplicative set, I, an ideal in R, such that we have that if we take the tight closure of I and R and we localize, then that will always be contained in the tight closure of the localization in the ring, in the localized ring, but it's strictly, right, strictly contained. So localization is bad and I asked Holger earlier and he thinks that, so this is an affine example, but he thinks we can, it can be homogenized and made into a local example. So I hadn't been sure about that. All right, so because of that example, this weakly F regular doesn't imply F regular, very straightforwardly at least. So Hoxter and Heunicke just defined what strongly F regular means, so let me remind you what that means. So we have a strongly F regular ring if for all C in R naught, right here for us, we're assuming a domain, so just assume it's not zero, there exists Q sufficiently large, Q is a P to the E power, such that R times C one over Q sitting inside R one over Q, that's the meaning of strongly F regular and this localizes well. You can turn this into a question about hams, everything is finite, nice localization. Okay, and this was the key to finding test elements, essentially, among other things. So we obviously have that, well not obviously, but strongly F regular implies, well implies F regular, which obviously implies then weakly F regular. Okay, and also I just want to point out, this implies normal and Cohen-McCauley. Okay, so I'm interested in the question of completing the circle here, I'll write that down in a second, so let's do that. So question two, I should say does weakly F regular imply strongly F regular? Okay, so let me give you a brief history of this. So in the original paper in 1990, Hoxter and Heuneky show this if R is Gornstein, I mean the paper was published in 1990, I'm sure this was known by them as soon as they decided to talk about strongly F regular. Then the next result was in 1993, Lori Williams, a student of Mills, showed that it's true in dimension, for dimension of R less than or equal to three, well she really did the dimension three case, and in 1995 another student of Mills, Brian McCriman, did the case that R is Q Gornstein on the punctured spectrum, and in fact what Williams showed is that that's actually what Williams showed because that's true always in dimension three, and McCriman generalized that, and then Brian came actually to Missouri and spent some time as a postdoc, and so that was in 1996 or fall of 95 maybe, and so that was when I started working on this problem, so I tell my students in class you know you think you worked on that problem a long time by working on it for an hour, but let me tell you what a long time is, yeah so a little bit more history in 1999, Gennady Lebesnik and Karen Smith did the, but the argument is highly dependent on the grading, it's impossible to generalize it beyond that, and I want to mention also around the same time, I think, did I write down here, so around 2000 Adela Virigiu, another student of Mills, had related results, so related graded results, the same result, and that's where things stood for a long time, there really hasn't been any progress since then that I'm aware of, okay, so let me spend some time trying to explain to you for where, what's going on in this problem, so let me take an injective hull, and so basically tight closure behavior in R is, this might be a bit of the wrong word, but let me say it's determined by the tight closure of zero in E, so don't take that too rigorously, there's no rigor there, okay, I mean for those who know this is the annihilator of this is the big test ideal, that's a very concrete thing, but somehow overall the way this module behaves tells you something about tight closure overall, and so the one issue here is that E is not finitely generated, well outside of dimension zero, and so there are a couple of tight closures we have to think about, so the first one, so let me just say there are several tight closures, alright, so there's what's called the finiteistic tight closure in E, and so what that is, is the union over all say M contained in E and M is finitely generated, we look at the tight closure in M, we take all of those guys, and then there's also the tight closure in E, which I'm going to describe how we can think about this without having to understand anything about tight closure in modules, because nobody really wants to think about general modules in this case, alright, so we do have that the finiteistic tight closure is contained in the real tight closure, the true tight closure, and so of course we really what I think we'd like to see is that these are equal, that's essentially what we're after, okay, I guess I'll post state that as a question soon, and their connection, the direct connection to the questions of weak and strong F regularity are as weakly F regular, if and only if this finiteistic tight closure is zero, that reflects something we can talk about that doesn't involve localization, and are strongly F regular if and only if the actual tight closure is zero, and so question three is is zero star E equal to the finiteistic tight closure, that's the question we'd like to answer, alright, and so yes to question three is going to imply yes to question two, let me go back to question two briefly, I missed question two, where did I put question two, does weak F regularity imply strong F regularity, so alright, so let's assume that our local ring, I guess I've already assumed this, but let me emphasize that RMK is a Cohen-McAuley domain, and it has, and J contained in R is a canonical ideal, essentially I'm assuming we have enough to get a canonical module, and then we can always represent that by an ideal when we're in the domain case, alright, so we can construct the injective hall in the following way, so let's choose, we're going to choose a system of parameters, so say x1 in J, and then x2 through xd, take a system of parameters, alright, and I'm going to need their product, so let's call y1 the product of the x's, and we're going to set this ideal i sub t to be, we're going to take J, multiply it by the t minus first power of x1, and take the t-th powers of the rest of the x2's, and then in this case, each r mod it, well when you have a canonical ideal and you kill it, you get a Gorenstein ring, and x1 to the t minus 1 J is isomorphic to J, so we still get a Gorenstein ring, and then we're killing a system of parameters in the Gorenstein ring, so this each rit is a zero-dimensional Gorenstein ring, that's supposed to say ring, my pen isn't writing there for some reason, so choose u1, let's call it in r, a Sockle generator mod i1, and then let's set ut to be the product, y1 to the t minus 1 u1, and then this is, this guy will be a Sockle generator mod it, so we have this picture, we have r mod i1 and r mod i2 for instance, and here there's u1 bar, finished teaching linear algebra, but it's not a vector, so u1 sits in here, and you can map it to u2, and so there's an injection like that, and this keeps, we can then inject into r3, so u2 goes to u3 bar, and so on, so in here is ut bar, and the the union, the direct limit gives you e, so e is the direct limit here of the r mod i2, and so using this construction I'm going to be able to put everything I want to talk about in tight closure in terms of ideals, which is a lot easier to think about, so the finiteistic tight closure in this case turns out to be the direct limit over t of the it star mod the it, so that's easy to describe, and so let me say what this means, so if we have w plus some it1, if that's in the finiteistic tight closure of e, so this is saying the following statement, there exists a c and r0, and there exists a t2 such that for all q, the following c, y to the t2w to the q is in i to the t1 plus t2q, all right, so this is a direct limit, so being in the tight closure mod it1, you might not be in the tight closure mod it1, but if you push some finite number of steps you'll get in the tight closure, so but versus the following, what does it mean for w plus it1 to be in the tight closure of e? Well, so this says there is a multiplier, there's a c and r0, we get to start off the right way, but now we have to switch quantifiers, so such that for all q there exists, let's call it an sq, and this sq depends on q such that c, y to the sq, w to the q is in i, now we've got t1 plus s, so q, all right, and sq depends on q, and this is where the complications come in, because what we'd really like to be able to do is to take that sq and say, oh no, there is a uniform bound on the sqs that's independent of q, all right, so, skip what I was going to do there for time, all right, so now let's go back to, this is very general what I've been talking about, if one is really interested in the bigger picture, not just of is weak and does weak imply strong, but does the so-called test ideal and the finitely generated test ideal do those, are those the same, all right, so let's go back to the weakly F regular case, so what does it mean that we're not weakly F regular, or that we are weakly F regular, so this says for all say t0, this element u t0 is, which again, right, is y t0 minus 1 u1, that is not in i t0 star, that's the condition of F regular, strong F regularity actually, all you have to do is look at the soccer element and it says that u1, I guess bar, is not in the tight closure of 0, that's it, all right, so let's suppose that u1 bar is in the tight closure, so what does that tell us, that tells us that there exists a c, say not equal to 0, such that for all q there exists, I guess I called it s, such that, I lost my place here, okay, such that all we need to do is we've got c sq u1 raised to the q is in i to the, I guess this would just be 1 plus sq, that's the t, all right, and let me remind you, so this is x1, I guess, to the sq, all right, let me, y1 to the sq with the c u1 to the q, oh, damn it, try again, it's over here, I want to say this is c y1 to the sq times u1, sorry, I think that makes, that actually makes sense now, I can tell my class yell at me if I make a stupid mistake, they never do, and so how am I doing 20 minutes, I think I'm going to make it, so when you, I want to look at this, so this is the ideal x1 to the 1 plus sqj, x2 to the sq plus 1 through xd to the sq plus 1, raised to the q, oh yeah, yeah, thank you, that's very important, that should just be an sq, okay, now, so, all right, so let me call y2 the product from x2 on, all right, so y1 is just x1, y2, all right, and now what you get from this is you can write this, this way, c y2 to the sq u1 to the q is in j to the q plus x2 to the sq plus 1 through xd to the sq plus 1 to the q, and I'm colonning here with x1, I'll just put in x1 infinity, some big power of x1, but this is, these guys wear a colon Macaulay ring and these are parameters, so this is just equal to the ideal, so you see we've taken x1 out of the picture without any trouble, so what we have now is the following picture, I have, think about it this way, I have r mod j x2 through xd to the q and then, since I've, again, since I've taken x1 out of the picture, I have j and I get x2 squared through xd squared to the q and this keeps going, and over here we've got, say, j x2 squared xd, sorry, this should be an sq and an sq raised to the q, and this is all multiplication by y2 to the q each, so what we have after multiplying by c is we have something here that, as we push it forward, eventually here it goes to zero, so this is, this is essentially, we're looking in a direct limit, we've got an element in the direct limit that we know is zero, and therefore, it, well we know already in some sense that sq is the finite value that puts us into zero, but the problem is we would like to not have sq depend on q, we would like to, to bound it, all right, and so let me tell you, I, I, I don't want to kind of get too technical, it, it quickly gets hard to describe, but let me just say that, so we, we can get x, the exponent on x2 down easily, all right, so r is normal, okay, so, so pick x2 such that x2 times j is contained in a principal ideal, okay, which we can always do, and then we can bound the exponent on x2, and then in dimension three, sorry, at height two, so that's a result of Lippmann, that if we're dimension two, and I, I believe it the correct term is pseudo-rational, all right, which holds in this case, f-rational singularities in dimension two are, are very nice, that says that the, the class group is torsion, maybe it says more than that, finite, but all I need is torsion, and that means we can bound the exponent, whoops, the exponent on x3, we can, or we can choose an x3 and bound the exponent, all right, and that's, that's actually, that's essentially what Laurie Williams argument was, so in dimension three we're done, and then if you assume that, that the canonical ideal is torsion at all heights up to d minus one, then essentially you can keep bounding the exponents on the higher, you can choose the x's and keep bounding the exponents, oh, I skipped ahead, all right, so let's, we can erase this, because I just wrote that down, so let me get back in on schedule and my notes, so I won't write much on this page, so the problem is for xi, i bigger than or equal to four, we need a new idea, okay, this, this, this kind of thing isn't going to work, and so let's say that our j is the canonical ideal, as I said, well, you can take what's called, you can find another ideal that intersects with j and gives you a principal ideal, so this is the anti-canonical ideal, I guess this linkage, right, so I brought, I brought the parents work in, so they're a whole theory of linkage in height one, right, so notice that, and I want to do this in such a way that the height of i plus j is two, so they don't share any components, all right, okay, so I guess here is where the, the new kind of stuff starts, I'm a little behind where I wanted to be, so let me see what I can say, so the setup here is let's think of R as the quotient of a regular local ring, all right, and I think back here, let me add in a little bit here, this j bracket q, I can replace this by actually the q-symbolic power, if I can do it in that can the q-symbolic power is bigger, it turns out that's fine, so, so what we do is we consider the following, we stick our mod j to the symbolic power into its double-dual over s, so we look at x h over s of h over s of r mod jq, and this is all into s, s is a nice Gorenstein ring, so, so that's its double-dual, and let's, let's call this mq because I don't want to have to write it again, and so, oh, and I forget, I'm gonna make you go back in your notes again, and this is page 10, call this last thing equation one, okay, I'll leave that there for a minute, all right, so, it turns out that if you want to, the bounding exponents in equation one is essentially the same as doing the same, bounding the exponents, exponents on mq, well, the local co-emology of mq rather than, I mean, it's not on mq itself, and so, this is equivalent by local duality, and using the Cohen-McCauley-ness of the regular ring, and what I call much pain, which, that's why this paper is so hard to read, this is the same thing now as bounding annihilation, local co-emology modules over m of the r-mod iq symbolic powers, and so, we are back to question one, that is why I wanted to know, an answer to question one is that we changed the question from, into this much simpler looking question about local co-emology modules on this one ideal, okay, so, let me tell you, let me spend the last six minutes saying what we were able to prove, so, let me call them, I'll start with theorem one, so suppose we have a local ring that's excellent, and Cohen-McCauley normal, and dimension at least four, take i to be this anti-canonical ideal, and let's assume that it's, the class group is torsion in co-dimension two, so then what we can show is for, between one and d minus two, so there exist parameters x1 through xd minus j plus one, such that we get annihilation in the following, so if we look at the ideal x1 through xd minus j plus one, we raise that to the q-th power, then if we look at that times the j-th local co-emology of, well, we, we have to include that m, it turns out, so we look at i to the mq, then that is equal to zero, for e bigger than or equal to one, oh, well, for all q, and in particular, what we're saying is this finiteistic tight closure over e of e is the regular tight closure, so, so getting these bounds on those, these local co-emology modules of Armand symbolic powers is sufficient to determine, now this is, this turns out to be pretty hard to, to satisfy, or to satisfy the conditions of the theorem, we, we don't know very many cases, but let me tell you one case, so the case that we were able to, to get, so let's assume that we've got an excellent weakly-affirregular ring of dimension d, let's take i to be our anti-canonical ideal, and the, the condition on, this is an assumption in theorem one that we have such a thing, but in a weakly-affirregular ring that, that assumption is satisfied, okay, so, I want to suppose the following, so we look at the, the so-called anti-canonical cover, okay, so what this is is the direct sum of the symbolic powers, so suppose that that is noetherian, but we only need on the punctured spectrum again, okay, so the conclusion is that there exist parameters as in theorem one, i.e., r is strongly-affirregular, okay, so this, this is a new result that does push the envelope epsilon farther, since the, the, well there, there are lots of cases where the, the anti-canonical cover is not noetherian, but I guess the last thing I want to mention is something I admit to not understanding the mathematics very well, but I, the minimal model program I guess does have something to, to say here, so there's a result of Doth's and Waldron that for characteristic p greater than five, if, if the dimension of the ring is three, and if the ring is essentially a finite type over a field of infinite transcendence degree over Zp, then this ring, the anti-canonical cover, this guy, is noetherian, and my, my understanding is the conjecture, no, no, no, sorry, let me move that down, that's, that is much too strong a statement, it's not right, yeah, no I need one assumption, but a very important assumption, yeah, as soon as I started to think about going on, if R is strongly F regular, which is a strong assumption, then this, this anti-canonical cover is noetherian, and I gather the conjecture is they, that independent of dimension that this should be true, okay, and again I don't understand the mathematics behind this, but what this, one thing that, that this does say is, so, so this gives us what I'll, the last theorem, theorem three, if RMK is again say complete, and dimension four, and F regular, so not, not just weakly F regular, F regular, so I do need to know that when I localize I'm still, still weakly F regular, then R is strongly F regular, and this is because once we know that we're F, weakly F regular in dimension three, we are strongly F regular, and then the, the anti-canonical cover is noetherian on the punctured spectrum, and now we have the conditions of theorem two, satisfied. I'll stop there. Any questions for Yen? I have an elementary question, what is the meaning of principle and co-dimension two? Just that it's generated by, by a single element, it's a principle ideal at all height two, at height two primes, at height two primes. It can be different generators, that's right, I mean essentially what happens is, yeah, you, you kind of get a, that, that generator A works everywhere, but finitely many primes, and then you have to find another generator at a few primes, or of course it might be a higher power, sorry, it's a power of A works. Any other questions, comments? So, I have a comment, this reminds me a lot of, was somewhat of your work with Janet on uniform, art and reese, seems to also involve a lot of painful estimation, are there any common, common themes in this? You're going through a lot of like Kozoo, you know, analysis of Kozoo homology and, you know, you're looking at. So, the thing about the, the, the uniform art and reese type theorem is, is that because you can get to reductions, you, you I think end up kind of needing to annihilate parameter homology, and that's, you know, easy in some sense, right, because, because we, we know we have those, and here you're, you're having to annihilate the, the homology or co-homology of, of something involving one extra, you know, it's, it's, it's an almost complete intersection of smaller size than the, the ring, and that, that's where the problem lies. So essentially you, you, you have, we, we got rid of x1, so we're really looking at x2 through xd, taking the q-th powers, but we also have a in there, that, and a shares primes with x2, that throws everything off. You secretly love this kind of pain, don't you? It's, I, I'd have to argue it's not so secret at this point. Any other questions? All right, let's sing Yannick.


UNNATURAL DEATH by Dorothy L. Sayers Read by Ian Carmichael Part 1 The Medical Problem But how I caught it, found it, or came by it, what stuff is made of, whereof it is born, I am to learn. Merchant of Venice Chapter 1 Overheard The death was certainly sudden, unexpected, and to me, mysterious. Letter from Dr. Patterson to the registrar in the case of Regina v. Pritchard. But if he thought the woman was being murdered, my dear child, said the young man with a monocle. It doesn't do for people, especially doctors, to go about thinking things. They may get into frightful trouble. In Pritchard's case, I consider Dr. Patterson did all he reasonably could by refusing a certificate for Mrs. Taylor, and sent in that uncommonly disquieting letter to the registrar.  If there'd only been an inquest on Mrs. Taylor, Pritchard would probably have been frightened off and left his wife alone. After all, Patterson hadn't a spark of real evidence, and suppose he'd been quite wrong what a dust-up there had been. All the same urged the nondescript young man dubiously extracting a bubbling hot helix pomartia from its shell, and eyeing it nervously before putting it in his mouth. Surely it's a clear case of public duty to voice one's suspicions. Of your duty, yes, said the other. By the way, it's not a public duty to eat snails if you don't like them. No, I thought you didn't know. Well, why wrestle with a harsh fate any longer? Waiter, take the gentleman's snails away and bring oysters instead. No, no, as I was saying.  But doctors, poor devils, are everlastingly walking a kind of social tightrope. People don't fancy calling in a man who was liable to bring out accusations of murder on the smallest provocation. Excuse me. The thin-faced young man sitting alone at the next table had turned round eagerly. Look, it's frightfully rude of me to break in, but every word you say is absolutely true, and mine is a case in point. A doctor, you can't have any idea how dependent he is on the fancies and prejudices of his patients. They resent the most elementary precautions. If you dare to suggest a post-mortem, they're up in arms at the idea of cutting poor dear so-and-so up, and even if you only ask permission to investigate an obscure disease in the interest of research, they imagine you're hinting at something unpleasant. Of course, if you let things go, and it turns out afterwards there's been any jiggery percury, the coroner jumps down your throat and the newspapers make a butt of you, and whichever way it is, you wish you'd never been born. You speak. Sample complete. Ready to continue?


What's everybody JC over jatsby's case race calm We just sold out 20 23 penny national treasures baseball for a box case break PYT number 14 guys. What's up Johnny? How you doing man?   I took shading truck over 13 and a half. Uh-huh. He's three for 14 How many points you have? Wait, he's not as tired as I thought. He's not playing. You're not playing no more? Well, bro, they can't like they can't give up. All right guys, here we go. Oh Fatty fatty right here guys Oh God and hitters ink Masataka Yoshida nice three-color patch and on book For the red sauce going to DIY. That's sick right there man. I know man Landing was the first call. I think he was the second call And honestly like I was trying to tell Chad I mean I know Chad knows this too But it doesn't seem like Washington's gonna be any much better than they were this year in the sense that like Lot of the players are leaving right there's like 50 or 60 senior guys and I Don't know how it is with the transfer portal with them and stuff like they're recruiting. So honestly, man It's good. I probably has a better shot to just continue to dominate by moving to Alabama We valley Marte for Cincinnati Eric clicks chat over that. He'll be happy if they at least win nine games Diego Cartaglia for the Dodgers to 49 R&B there 30 out of 49 That's a zero going to add and we got treasures that's burble. I love him for the Minnesota Twins 77 out of 99. Oh, we're gonna get some out. We just started we don't get you so Minnesota twins gonna kip kip We got a Albert bull horse for the angels going to Joseph 49 oh, it's funny. I sent him a I don't know if he showed it to you, but I sent him a Ducks receiver Twitter or X space, you know, they do like a little spaces and Rome with Rome on Tuesday joined it and he was just you know talking to them And then he like threatened to say he'll come back and and play for Washington if they're not nice to him It was so funny And then we have a printing plate one of one of Christian Hernandez Which I believe is a cub Jervine there you go, man. Let me double check. I'm pretty sure that's cubs Yes, Chicago cubs. There you go one-on-one and we got a Curtis me to 99 Tampa Bay rays that is part of the R&B 72 Spot two is going to Joel We got a three color patch and autograph of Colson Montgomery for the White Sox Going to Jonathan And we got a Jag Leiter for Texas Rangers going to Stephen SKS And last one here is a jumbo patch printing plate autograph Look at that patch right there and it's Raffella for the Red Sox What a box for the Red Sox dy There you go, man Another one of one on this one. All right next one guys. I've got Harold Baines for Chicago White Sox John them down and we got a Nick York for Boston out of 25 We got a camcaller to 10 for Cincinnati going to Eric. We got a Miller Higgins That should be Yankees And yes, that is the Yankees Yankees that's going to Matt and we got an autograph here of Owen Murphy for Atlanta To 99 Atlanta Braves going to Matt And we got a patch autograph over Elvius Martinez for Toronto to 99 Lou J's going to Dylan and we got to 99 Mason Wynn for St. Louis Carnot's part of the R&B that's going 28 Spot eight is going to Jim Murray We got a little Edgar Martinez for Seattle Seattle's picked up one of the last few teams to Ryan with that one 16 out of 35. There you go, man and Get some orders for Alan. How about that? 6 out of 10 Jackson holiday three color patch and autograph There you go, buddy Very nice holiday to nice Another fake one right here. We got a book of Zach Veen tonight and I nice little pinstripes an autograph there That's Colorado Rockies going to Ryan H and we got a Michael Bush just traded to the Cubs today actually But that's obviously still gonna go the Dodgers here and that's gonna go to 37 out of 49 7 is going to Ed Then we got a Jacob Berry for Miami Miami going to have and then we have a two of two Charlie Geringer two of two jersey numbers. Damn The only made two of these guys and we got it. We'll eBay one-on-one as well being two of two and I'm Detroit Tigers Going to Joseph little Joe Joe Lofton. There you go, man sick And we got a relic here of whitey Ford for the New York Yankees 36 out of 49 Yankees going to Matt and we got K. The Horton 61 out of 99 that's going to Chicago Cubs When a Jervine and then we got a flamethrower Ben Joyce for the Los Angeles Angels What a Joe and we have Gonzo for Arizona 57 out of 99 Dimebacks going to Kev. That's a nice one. And then we have a out of 25 Jace young For Detroit another one there for Joe and then we got a Grayson Rodriguez patch autograph for Baltimore Nice patch with her to 30 out of 99 Another one for Allen who took the Orioles I think so too. I mean that Jackson holidays of party pretty big one. Hey, we got one more box, man, right? Let's increase that our legendary material Tony Gwynn for San Diego Padres that's going to rubber uncle and we got Dick Williams for Montreal never mantra X balls goes to the Washington Nationals So that's going to Justin Then we got a Tony Gwynn for San Diego little field pass to 99 rally We got Mazataki Yoshida to 25 9 out of 25 Come on, so I'm in a monster break Rafael for call to 99 for Atlanta When a mat and how about this signature here of Cecil fielder to 10 Detroit having a good break for cheaper team there I think they were only a $49 team. We got a tin cans for St. Louis. That's 79 out of 99 By nine is Jim The R&B Jim Murray We got out of 10 Brooks Lee from Minnesota Kip Johnson, and we have a nice patch autograph of Drew Jones. Look at that one two three color patch as well necklace choice That's a diamond backs going to Kev and Last one here is Kevin brought up for the Mets 64 to 99 Mets part of the R&B for one of Joseph Lawson and there you go guys That was the breaks remember guys obviously and there might have been some people that might have not got much If not anything, but this is a promo break So that means everybody's gonna get a chance to get some money back potentially so again. I'm gonna Paste in the names here, but I'm also gonna take out Let's do this really quick Take out the R&B ones There you guys go. Awesome guys. So again the next break Could be NT, but it might be NT football guys So now that we got those breaks done guys We're down to seven left here 16 and we got to do a couple of those breaks there to solve the promo guys We have till tomorrow night guys appreciate it jazby skates breaks calm


In this video, I'll be going over everything you need to know about trading view from the charts, customization, to setting up alerts to the watch list, so it's going to be a pretty lengthy video. Because of that, I created a timestamp for every section of the video at the bottom, so you can click on this section that's the most important to you, and I don't waste your time. So as usual, everything will be linked down in the description, so if you're looking for the best broker, scanner, charts, and news feed, it's going to be linked down there, so let's get into the video. Alright, so the first thing we're going to do is go over the user icon, click on it, and go into color team, and we're going to be changing this to a dark color because it's going to be easier on the ice. When this is done, we're going to click back on this, and we're going to go into drawing panel because it might not be checked. And you can see over here in this section right now, there's nothing, and you're going to need it if you're going to be using trading view. So go back over here and click it to make sure it's there. So now that the drawing panel is over here, what you want to be doing is click this little start at the bottom, and this is going to come up. This is going to be your preferred tool, the one that you choose to put there to access this, what you have to do is just go over here and just select and click the little stars beside and they're going to appear over here. So the one I have selected is the trend line horizontal line horizontal rate and anchored VWAP, you're going to be able to customize them later on because we're going to go back into this section to really make sure everything is properly done. So now we're going to be customizing the charts in trading view and there's something that you absolutely have to do if you're going to be using this platform. And this one is either zooming in on your layout or zooming out. Not many people know about this, but it's pretty important. So right now we see we're zoomed in at 100%, but there's something that you can do if you're using a smaller screen or you need more real estate and it's zoom out. So normally I do zoom out to about 80% to make sure I have more space on my screen and after that I'm going to be able to zoom in all the other things to make sure everything is properly sized. But for this tutorial, what I'm going to do is zoom it back to 100%. And the reason why I want to do this is just so it looks better on camera and for this recording. All right, so now that you have selected the right size for you in term of zoom in and zoom out, the first thing we're going to be doing in this is going to be just selecting the right type of candle. And this is going to be for sure a preference depending on the type of trader you are and all of that stuff to do this. What you have to do is just go over here and just select the one you want. Most people choose the regular one because it looks better. But there's a lot of people that do use the hollow candle and the main difference is just that the green one is going to be hollow and compared to the red one, which is going to be full. So now to get the max of this platform and customize it the exact way that we want, what we're going to do is just right click, go to settings and we're going to go into all of these section one by one. So the first section that we have is the body, the border and the wick and these are the colors for the candle. Most people leave it like that or they change it to some different type of green, different type of red, but the green and the red is the classic color. So a lot of people do change the wick. So they put in something like a gray like this so they can really see the wick a little bit better versus other people that just keep it the traditional way. So we're going to go back into settings. So we don't want to save these settings and we're going to go back into colors because there's something I wanted to show you guys. So when you selected or created a custom color, it's annoying to not have it back if you want to sometimes do some low adjustment or stuff like that.  These are all colors that I just selected or created for different type of indicator or something. I was just trying out different colors for the candles and all of that stuff. So right now I want to go back to the traditional color. So what I'm going to do is just go over here, select it and put it back the way it should and we can see over here that that's how it is. It's back to normal. So the next thing we're going to go is into this section over here. This is going to be a personal preference like anything that we're doing to this chart is going to be removing this little line. I just find it annoying to always see this little green thing around the whole chart. So what I like to do is just remove it and just keep it very simple without it. I think it looks better. The pre and the post market closed is only going to be important if you're looking at a daily check right now we have one stock in this example and the market is currently closed because I'm recording this on the weekend. But if it would be a Monday or Tuesday or any day of the week and we are pre-market so that means before 9 30 this is going to be important because it's going to show me where the stock is considering to its daily chart because in certain scenario the stock it's gapping up a lot or gapping down a lot so you're able to have this low indicator like this price over here but you're going to be having it in blue or orange depending if it's pre or post market. So the next section that we have is the high and the low and it is pretty self-explanatory so it's going to just show you where is the recent low and where is the high. It's more important when you're looking at stuff like intraday it's going to show you over here you know what's this line over here and also the recent high considering the range that you are looking at. So right now we can see that we're looking at all of this range so it was showing us that this is the high but it's going to be more important you know if you're really looking for like a specific time frame or like an intraday session it's going to be a little better. I prefer not to put it on because I like to really have it less on my chart and I feel it's the best way to go. So moving along we're going to go into the next section which is super important. This is the session so right now it's only showing us the regular trading session so that means from 9 30 to 4 p.m. but we want to see also what's happening pre-market so what you're going to do is just click here go into extended trading session and now it's going to show you you know the pre and the post market and it's going to give us so much more information which is extremely important. So precision we're going to leave it to default and also time zone New York time zone is normally the right time because you're looking at the market time so we want to keep it exactly like that. So we're going to be moving along into the status line and this is some settings that are really really personal it doesn't mean you have to change any of them it's going to be really depending on you and what you prefer to see on your chart. So this over here are going to be this specific line so if you want to remove the title and I'm going to be doing so because we're going to be doing something later on I'm going to remove the open close value which is not something I really want to see or I could say you could leave it depending on what trading platform you're using. So we're going to leave it for this example and bar change value. So this I'm going to change it because there's something that's a little bit weird with trading view is when you're looking at an intraday chart this bar change value is going to just be the actual bar over here and it's not going to be the full daily chart and how much it's actually moving on the day. So I rather just remove this one. So I'm just going to leave the open high low and close value which you're going to be appearing over here. So the next thing is title. So this is going to be just you know what you prefer is for the indicator over here you could remove it or leave it it's going to be dependent and value you can leave it or remove it I prefer just to remove it I found it a little bit better and background over here is just going to be if there's a background behind these value and you can put one if you prefer just can make it a little bit more clean to read know what's happening over here by the way at any point during this video don't forget to check out the link in description. So now we're going to be moving along into scale and this is going to be a couple more things that are quite important. So symbol last price. So this you for sure want to leave it on because it's this over here if you don't have it they're going to be able to see what price it's currently trading at and I think it's pretty important. So this we're going to just leave it that symbol last price indicator value and financial value. So this I think it's pretty important for the volume. So over here I'm just going to move this a little bit bigger we can see you know volume is going to be 65.245. So it's going to tell us you know what the current value when it comes to volume and it's going to show us on our chart at it's happening. So if you pay close attention to volume this is something that you definitely want to have on your chart. But the next thing is going to be no overlapping label. So I'll show you guys an example of what it is. So if we go over here and we select you know a drawing line and we're going to put it at the same value. So 972 we can see that we have 972 and 972. So it's going to actually put the two value you know above or below each other. So nothing is over anything. I think it's quite good. It's annoying sometimes when you do have multiple line because it's going to kind of mixed we know what price is what line. So when you have like too much on your chart it's not something you actually want. But overall if you just have like a small thing I think it's going to be pretty pretty good. The following thing here is going to be count down to bar close. This is going to be if you're looking at a 15 minute a five minute or one minute it's going to tell you how many seconds per minute is left to the current candle that's being printed on your chart. So sometimes if you're using some kind of specific bar value or you want to just buy the next candle that breaks you know exactly how much time you have left before your strategy becomes valid. And this could be a good insert in scenario I prefer to just remove it because I know depending on the time of day how much time is left to that candle. So 30 plus button over here we're just going to remove it. We don't need to see anything on a chart. Add to that we have currency and unit always invisible. So that's totally fine. Otherwise you know you can say always visible it's going to show you know USD over here. So always invisible because you can assume you know what currency you're trading at and all that stuff. So the next thing is going to be scale placement and this is going to be your scale over here. If you want to put it on the left side which would be weird it's going to be looking like this. I rather leave it on the right and it's going to be so much more simple and so much better. So time hour format I leave it at 24 hours and date format it's not going to matter much but you can just leave it like this or you can actually change it depending on what you prefer. For me it doesn't really matter so I leave it at the way it is. So moving on to appearances. So we're going to change this over here. So this is going to be some more interesting settings for sure because it's going to be really what you're looking at. So gradient I rather just not have it. It's quite annoying when you just change color especially if you're looking at many tries and just create some new ones that you kind of don't want.  So vertical line these are going to be these ones over here. I like to have some just because it creates some kind of depth to the chart. So I just leave it at something like an eight and this one I rather just have it as the dotted line. I think it looks a little bit better and we can actually just boost it up just one bit and also 18%. So you guys saw what I did. So you know I just click you know I choose this the basic color that it comes with and you can just choose the opacity whatever you prefer so we can have a good contrast like this over here. So session break I personally don't like it. We can see you know it's going to give you a big line where you kind of don't need it because we already have a pre market and a post market in different kind of colors. So pre market over here post market over there. So we don't need this extra line for nothing cross air is this little thing that you can see this X you can put something wider or you can put something darker. I like to have it a bit darker so it's not flashing too much on my screen and this is going to be pretty good. So the text so because we do have changed as we said before the screen size and I put it back to 100% but I normally choose 80. So what I do is I just boost this to something like a 20 and it's I'm finally going to be able to see you know what's really the price that it's currently trading at and it's going to be way better. There's one thing that I just passed over and this is pretty important. It's the watermark and we can see over here it's going to appear right there and what I like to do with this is just put it you know lighter so I can know which one I'm looking at or which stock because sometimes I have many stocks on my screen so it just makes it so much better. So that's the way I kind of like to have this over here and that's also the reason why I took off the title over here because I have it on my chart there. Next thing you know line these are going to be the line that separates the stuff on your chart so you can see right now you have a line over here. I think it looks better if you do put one. So this is going to be pretty good at something like you know 52 so we're going to leave it like this so navigation always invisible pan always invisible so this is fine. So this is going to be quite important right it's going to show you know the top and also the bottom and also the right. So if you want a bigger margin at the bottom you can just put 20 if you want some bigger margin at the top you can just change go back over here and you know put 20 also so it's going to just show you a bit more space above and below so it's going to be really dependent on what you need and what you prefer. I like to put something normally around the 10 because we're going to be creating something with indicators so it's going to help us know with all the features and all that customization so we're going to leave it at 10 for now. So moving along to the next section which is going to be trading and this we're going to be doing a couple things because we're not using trading view as a broker we're only using it for trading or charting I would say you're just going to unclick this so it's going to remove this big thing over here that you don't want to see also we're going to remove all this stuff you know orders we don't need all of this so we're going to remove all this and it's going to be better just like this so the next thing that's going to be pretty important it's going to be events so if we go back to something like a daily chart right now we can see you know when we go at the bottom it's going to have the earnings earnings and earnings so it's going to tell you when the earnings are happening and when they're not so you can know if you're holding a position overnight maybe you want to be doing something different with your position because on earnings it moves a lot you can also leave dividends on chart so this is going to be something like if you're looking at spy it's going to show you here you know there's dividends on this chart at this current price so if ever we're gapping down or gapping up on the dividends or whatsoever you know it's the reason why it's actually happening so split on charts leave it like this so if you have some split it's going to show you the split if there's earnings you're going to show the earnings and I don't like to put the earnings break because when you look at the stock you can kind of see you know this big line and it's just a little too much we already know looking at the bottom that there is earnings so that's going to be good enough so when you create it you know everything that you want over here you can definitely just save a template so save as and it's going to just save this so if ever you're looking to just load it into some different chart you can do it this way I prefer to do it in a different manner but I still do have some layout that are saved from probably a couple years ago so in this section we're going to be customizing you know the layout but also you know watch list and all of that stuff because there's many things that you can do with trading view and it's going to help you organizing your stuff what you want to be doing first is go over here because we did create a lot of settings so you probably want to save it if it's on autosave I highly recommend that you actually remove it because sometime you tweak it or you change a couple of things and what's going to happen after is that it's going to automatically save this layout that you didn't really want so what you're going to do is just remove this and we're going to create save layout and it's also a good thing to actually rename it so we're going to go over here and we're going to put just you know trading so we're going to keep it very simple so this is going to be saved for now and this is pretty good if you want to make a new copy of this layout you can actually just create make a copy and you know create trading we'll put it that too for this and you're going to have a separate layout over here so if you have multiple screen you can actually just put this layout on a different screen and it's going to be pretty good because right now I'm using four screens so I can have layouts on different screen and it really works well so we're going to go back into this section over here and you guys can see I have multiple layout and the one that I recently used you can also load the layout if ever you're opening it on a different computer and you want to load what you had before just click load the layout and all your choices are going to be there and it's going to be just you know a click away from loading the one you want so if we go back over here this section is quite done it's quite simple you just save your stuff over there what's important is this little thing right beside so we're going to click on this and this is where you can do a lot of customization when it comes to you know layout and also setting on your chart so right now what we're going to do is go on a four screen like this and we can see that right now we have three that actually saved the layout but there's one that's not so what we can do is just go into first settings and apply all so this is going to just create like a sync for everything the next thing you want or you don't want which is going to be dependent on your style and what's this layout is good for it is going to be symbol so this means that if ever I change anything so if I go to neo it's going to change it on the four but if I go back over here and I unclick this I can put spy and we can see over here that it only changed this one but not the other one so if you're watching multiple stock at once what's recommended is to not link them but if you're looking to just look at multiple time frame on one just go into symbol and then you can click on this one and you know just change the time frame for this and then over here you can have one that's maybe 15 minutes and we're gonna load it once again like this so it's a little bit better and this one you know we have a 30 minutes so you can have like multiple one and then you have your daily chart so you can have like a full scope full big picture of everything that's happening with this stock so if we go back over here we can see that there's many different choices of layout and also interval so this I personally don't like that means it's always going to be you know switching to like the same time frame and this is going to be your crosshair so that means like if you have this one it's going to move on everything and you guys can see it's quite confusing because you don't know where you actually are so I like to remove this and interval and time I don't touch these things so this one is only going to be the one that I might have or might not have depending on what's going on following along we're gonna go into the drawing over here and we're gonna put one and there's something that you're gonna see is this one only appearing on this chart but even if it's the same chart it's not showing up on this one to have it appear what you need to do is just click this little thing and what's gonna go happen now is when you click something it's gonna be appearing on every single chart so sometimes you do want this sometimes you don't and if you want to just remove them just click remove to drawing and everything is gonna be good to go so when you're using trading view you have this section over here that you can actually select volume gainer there's multiple categories of stock you know gap gainer so a gap any moved up it's going to be some interesting stocks that have most likely relative volume or have some outlier moves so this is pretty good but sometimes you do want to have your own watch list so this is to see every single stock that's moving and you know it's called the hot list to have your personal watch list just click over here and you can create really the one that you would like this is what I prefer and you guys can see I always have separators so if I look at you know fresh gappers I'll put it over here if I look at date to place I'm gonna put it over there so to create a custom watch list just click over here and you know create new list and then you can create you know watch list or whatever name you prefer I made a mistake but it's gonna be fine for this tutorial over here you know you can just click add to the watch list and it's gonna appear over here is also categories that you can add so if you go over here you can select what you want so you want maybe volume also extended our percentage change and everything is gonna appear and just you know if you want to just make it bigger just click like this and you can have a better view of what's happening so sometimes you do have actually a lot of stock in a watch list and you want sometimes a different watch list and for trading view there's something that's not really nice is you can just see every watch list that you have at once you need to see only one at the same time and that really annoys me but there's actually a feature that helps you do a couple things and it's add section so over here you guys can see have a title so sometimes I can put a bunch of stock in the first section and you know rename the section the second section as like the two like I did on the other one so I can know which stocks or what and what strategy is going to be related to the stock I'm actually watching so this helps me sometimes organize my workflow when I'm looking at stock pre-market so for the rest of this tutorial what we're gonna do is go into a single layout because it's gonna be way easier and we're gonna put a stock that's actually trading volume so we can see what's happening so we have Apple in this example because the chart looks pretty strong and it was a pretty good mover last week right now in term of indicator we don't have much and this is going to be something that we do need to add because most strategies do require indicators some people say you don't but most people say you will probably need at least one or two so right now we do have volume and something that's really annoying for me and you guys probably saw in this tutorial is when the chart like this goes over the the volume goes over the chart so to have something like this separate just go into this and say move to new pan below so now you're gonna have it in a sick separate section and it's gonna make it so much cleaner so much better and when you're looking at different type of stock it's gonna make it easier and what I said before into the setting that you need to know how to top or bottom over here this is going to be related to also this so it's going to help you know have a cleaner chart and just make sure you know it looks better so you can see over here we always have a bit of a distance and even if you're looking at the top over here we do also have a distance so it's going to help us you know have a cleaner layout and I think it's quite important for this so if you want to add an indicator just click on indicator and you know just type in what you want you can definitely test out a bunch of indicator but what I prefer is VWAP and you guys can see right now there's really a lot of things so we want to customize it just click on it you can go to settings or you can go from this over here it's going to be dependent on what you prefer so I'm going to remove these upper and lower band this you know you can change the color to something that you prefer dark purple is my color for my VWAP and I prefer it this way I'm going to also remove you know band fill and you know you can do all of these settings to any indicator but what's really really important for me it's this over here so right now if we look at this on you know a one hour chart it's still going to show the VWAP if you look you know at a daily it's still going to show it so it's going to be really annoying so what I like to do is just go into the settings and I don't want to see it on the monthly chart I don't want to see this indicator on the weekly chart daily chart hourly chart I only want to see it on either second or a minute and up to something like a five minute chart so that means if I go into a five minute I'm going to have my VWAP if I go into a 15 minute I don't have it so this is so much better than having it on every time frame because you probably don't want to have all your indicators on every single time frame that you're looking at sometime I like to use moving average but it's only going to be on a daily chart it's not going to be on an intraday chart so that's quite important for me so when this is done you can also do no setting and say over here save as default so right now every time I add VWAP it's going to have the exact same setting so when I'm building up charts or adding back indicators in the future if I change something everything is going to be good to go also something that I like to do is go into you know the setting over here go into input or style and I like to remove the label price on scale so at least I don't see it here here I only have my price and in full volume I'm still going to have it but for at least VWAP and moving average it's not going to pop up over here so if I look at something like a five minute I can see where does my VWAP is it doesn't need to cluster all my scale over here everything is going to be just perfect like this so moving along with this tutorial we're going to be doing something also to save us time in the future over here we can see we have multiple time frame 1, 2, 3, 5, 15, 30 and these are my favorite ones so these are the one I have selected what you want to do is probably just select you know the one you prefer actually don't really use the three minutes anymore so I'm just going to keep it at 2 and also the 5, 15, 30 I'm using more these 15 right now so I'm going to remove it and over here so right now you guys can see I only have a couple time frame so it's easier you know to just scroll through a couple of things also quite important to know that if you just type the time frame on your chart it's going to put everything that you want right 45 if you put you know one minute it's just there two minutes frame it's an easier way to do it and also the same thing as when it comes to you know trend line and all this stuff they all have some hot key so alt t is for my trend line so I just go you know alt t and after that I can just you know draw what I want and I'll also add alt j which is this one alt h which is the horizontal line which are just some stuff to you know when you're getting super used to the platform or whatsoever it just helps a lot you know it's just so much faster to put everything instead of having to be the you know go over here click and back and forth you also have this that we created before so if ever you want to just add anything it's always there now let's put it at the bottom over here so everything I need to go I can just click because sometime I do have this close depending on the chart that I'm looking at so it's just easier like this if you want to change any kind of indicator or I would say horizontal line or any tools color just go into your settings and you can just create you know change the color add the price label when you change the color it's just going to save automatically to the new color that you change so you don't have to do anything after so any new line that you put like this it's going to be this new color same thing with any other tools so the last thing we're going to talk about it's just going to be setting up alerts so there's a few way of doing so you can just you know put a line and also you know just add an alert to it you know just click over here and set what you prefer or you can do it in a different manner so you can just click over here and say just add alerts put it the price that you prefer and it's going to put this orange line that you can also change the color of course but this is going to appear on any chart that you have on your screen even if it's on the different layout so for example I have a couple layout on multiple screen this line is going to show on every single screen and when this pops up it's going to be pretty simple it's going to show me over here that this line as cross and also you have your alert log if you want to remove all the alerts that you have just click you know remove all active and it's going to be done this way so it's a pretty good way of creating alerts but there's also something that you can do you can put an alert to an indicator so I'm going to say if VWAP you know if the price crosses below VWAP you know cross is going to say cross over here below that price it's going to tell me so instead of value I'm going to put VWAP and it's going to you know fix this over here so I'm going to say continue anyway and after that you know there's an alert to this VWAP or you can say sometimes it's a moving average or anything like that so that's how you would do it so that's going to be it for this video if you enjoyed like and subscribe all the tools I use today trade a link in the description


Hello there everyone. My name is Kika and I'm going to be doing the MPS vlog today. I'm coming to you from a very frosty morning in Dublin. I'm on my way into DCUFM to do my FM show with Sophie Segleton. So running a bit late, Sophie I'll be there. Yeah so follow me along on this week. There's some exciting stuff happening so stay tuned. And I'm already out of breath. I've walked like two seconds. In the studio with Sophie Segleton. What song are we playing? I'll be pushing on. Yeah I don't know it. Sophie knows all the latest songs. I'm just like let's play Shakira. But yeah this is the studio. It's looking very fresh at the moment. They got all new. Keevis first time doing the decks. Yeah even on the decks. Yeah so we'll see how the show goes and see you later. Fast forward a good few hours and I'm on my way to the gym. But I feel really bad because I have to buy water guys. I lost my water bottle in work but I'm working tomorrow so I'm going to be getting it. But for some reason we just have no bottles in our house. This light is just so flattering. I was off my head. Concert thing in the National Concert Hall with my family. My dad's a big fan so we're just kind of tagging along. But we're going for food beforehand so we love that. We're just in the student center and we're going to see the Adams family by the city musical society. They've got like a lovely fire going on here. With a slushie on this very cold day. Thank you so much for watching if you've made it to the end of the video and yeah see you soon. Bye!


What's good y'all it's your boy Ross back and hanging with another video. So I'm gonna check out 10 WWE wrestlers who legit took offense to a segment WWE creative and Vince McMahon have been known to come up with some very interesting sometimes cringe and and or Some would say a little bit disrespectful segments and not only do the viewers may take offense to it Sometimes the wrestlers involved in the second in backstage telling it may take offense to it So we're gonna check it out. Appreciate all the love and support Road to 70k feels cool to say that and let's get right into it It's not just fans who sometimes get offended by segments that are seen on WWE television Sometimes actual wrestlers can come forward and admit that a segment personally offended them in a certain manner I know which wrestlers were they will join us now is wrestling 10 WWE wrestlers who took personal offense to a segment be sure to subscribe and hit that notification bell for daily wrestling videos And follow us on Facebook for exclusive least Number 10 key WWE superstars the Jason sensation segment Now for those not familiar with Jason sensation He's mostly known for doing an impression of Owen Hart on Roy in 1998 The impression according to sensation himself offended a number of key WWE superstars so much So the sensation will be released from his WWE contract The main issue seemed to be that sensation also did a number of impressions of different WWE superstars And eventually it began to rub superstars the wrong way and some viewed it as sensation taking the spotlight away from them While appearing on the two-man power trip podcast sensation revealed as time went on What I did started to work against me and it did start to rub some of the boys the wrong way Some of the boys went behind my back and kibosh my hosting job It's sucked. I lost that hosting gig because too many guys complained about using their gimmicks Number nine Randy one on the Eddie Guerrero promo I know that and one of the more controversial storylines WWE has ever done is their inclusion of the late great Eddie Guerrero's name in the Rey Mysterio vs. Randy Orton feud all the way back in 2006 Which was a fantastic feud one would make a number of distasteful in the sense of the wrestling like the wrestling was top-notch Comments in relation to Eddie and the promo including one where he stated that Eddie was in hell. Yeah, I did Remember that I was like, oh whoa, that's a That that goes a little bit too extreme, bro. That was That was an interesting time number of WWE talents felt that the segment was completely out of place And Eddie's name should not be mentioned in this way No, he had only passed away just a few months prior to the WWE performing the segment But they couldn't resist using his name in any way they could one superstar who took offense to the segment was actually Orton himself in recent years He's been open about the fact that he didn't like or want to do the segment However, he has stated that Mysterio convinced him that Eddie would have been fine with it So wouldn't decided to proceed with caution number eight Steffi. Wow And I'm pretty sure Eddie would have been okay with that man But you know, I get how some people would feel like yo that he just passed on some long ago I think that's a little bit. We shouldn't even go that far New McMahon the Dusty Rhodes segment Stephanie McMahon made a career of humiliating talents in promos Therefore when wrestling icon Dusty Rhodes went off scripturing a promo exchange in 2013 Stephanie wasn't just offended. She was furious In fact Stephanie was so offended that she outright refused to do any more segments with Dusty and being in the position She was in she had a wish granted Now the reason for Stephanie's outrage was because during a promo segment between her Triple H and the Rhodes family Dusty put his hand right in Stephanie's face So she couldn't talk Stephanie believed that this made her look weak But fans simply saw it as Dusty putting the billion-dollar princess in her place number seven Yeah, I wouldn't take too much offense to that. That was her gimmick is you know being pretty much like this billion-dollar rich brat, you know I'm saying so I Get it But I mean that was the whole point Dusty's like I don't care who you are I don't know Daniel Bryan AJ Styles and John Cena segment A talking smack has always been a show where talent can speak freely without being forced to go in a certain direction by a promo script Miz is talking smack segment was one of the best themes that year for sure This was certainly the case back in 2016 when SmackDown general manager Daniel Bryan revealed that he was offended by a segment between AJ Styles and John Cena on SmackDown in that segment Cena stated that if he got fired from WWE He won't go to wrestle anywhere else because he only loves WWE this deeply offended Bryan who went on a mini rant in relation to Cena's comments and stated I was actually taking him back and borderline offended by John Cena saying hey If this doesn't work out for you, you'll go somewhere else to wrestle and he would say I only want to wrestle in WWE It offends me because hey guess what I've been fired from WWE twice Sometimes when you get fired you have to go wrestle somewhere else John saying essentially that if you were to get fired He wouldn't go wrestle anywhere else because he only loves wrestling in WWE number six Chris Jericho triple H is promo in 2013 triple H cut a rather controversial promo directed at Daniel Bryan in the promo triple H who had bad mouth Rob Van Damme Chris Jericho and Edge He stated that there were never the number one guy in the WWE. I do remember this I do remember this he He kind of really goes at these these guys that he never really felt like what a plus players And even stated that if any of them were to face at WWE during the attitude era WWE would be out of business Jericho who remains one of the most decorated stars in WWE history would tweet a response to Triple H Saying thing is Triple H despite your major push. You never were either. Good luck in your future endeavors Fans were firmly on the side of chair Triple H was cool. Let's let's I'm not gonna discredit what Triple H was but we know he wasn't the face of WWE WWE back then he just wasn't you want to know why he wasn't because there was a guy That goes by stone cold. There was a guy that went by the rock that were way and I mean Leagues of head of being over triple H worked as a Counteract a counterpiece to them. He was never Just the face of those comp of the brand. He wasn't There was a lot of over talent too, but we knew who was one one a 1b respectively You can choose back then if Triple H wasn't it and I like Triple H back then from time to time But we know who was the top dogs Erica who had every right to be upset in relation to Triple H is rather brutal and unfair comments number five Mickey James The Alexa Bliss promo a WWE decided to build a Mickey James versus Alexa Bliss feud in 2017 around Mickey's age This was a lazily booked decision from WWE Especially because it made little sense as Mickey hadn't even turned 40 when the story was taking place For one segment which offended Mickey on a personal level was when she was given a walker as a gift This was to imply that she was too old to be wrestling Speaking to Chris Van Vleet Mickey would discuss how hurt she was by the segment and stated I could never wrap my head around and find it funny that I'm giving a walk on raw in 2017 yeah both it and it's not funny I was offended and I said that I was offended but I'm a professional and as a pro you go fine And let's see what happens nine times out of ten.  So I at that time like I don't I don't you know how WWE is they're there they are Sometimes they're not as uh, I guess you can say Spot on with the directions of where they want to take their wrestlers and their character the characters of their wrestlers And that one's just like come on bro. Mickey's Mickey James can still go. She's not even 40 yet Do you want backstage segment the segment involving the big show and Randy Orton at the start of 2021? Offended the big show so much that he decided to leave the WWE and signed with the competition AEW in this Infamous segment Orton would verbally run down the big show and at one stage He even put his hands over the big show's throat the issue was that big show virtually had no reaction It made the former WWE star look extremely weak and big show was quite rightly offended about how the segment made him look Number three The Charlotte flair and Becky Lynch title exchange. Yeah, I'm sorry a girl man for the man Girl man put his hand on my throat like bro. We going at it and it's the big show. So I'm just saying in segment in October of 2021 Become one of the most talked about segments of 2021. They're presented championship exchange between Becky Lynch He was a smackdown once again. I don't think championship exchanges should be a thing I think either they should lose it or fight for the titles some way to get the titles off them But championship exchanges like the fuck is this trading cards, bro I was champion and Charlotte Flair who was the raw women's champion The issue was that Charlotte had a lot of issues with the segment so much so that she went off script in the segment and threw Her title right to the ground Notably Becky was furious with Charlotte after the segment and she even got into a heated verbal exchange backstage after the segment had Members of WWE management and Becky herself believed that Charlotte was trying to make her look bad with her unprofessional and selfish behavior Yeah, Sonya Deville who was overseeing the segment also took exception to Charlotte's conduct according to reports Sonya was so offended into relation to how Charlotte acted She was ready to fight Charlotte backstage for real Number two Dean Ambrose the Roman Reigns cancer mention when Roman Reigns announced that his leukemia had returned after 11 years Fans had hoped that Reigns illness wouldn't be used for a storyline. Yeah, sadly They were wrong and WWE decided to use his illness to further a storyline between Seth Rollins indeed Ambrose Who happened to be two of Reigns's closest friends in the WWE in the bill to the Rollins and Ambrose match at the 2018 TLC pay-per-view Ambrose would cut a promo on-roar to promote the match And he would make a number of comments regarding Reigns including stating that his cancer return was karma. It would surface Yeah, he I remember those comments and I was like I Get it.  They went there but at the same time that's It's like, I don't know man I think that should have been a little bit off limits because you know, there's some there's someone's life That you know, we're talking about here But I get it sometimes they want to get a little edgy to bring in more realism to the story Sometimes it works. Sometimes people take offense to it and feel like it's it's you know It's not needed to enhance a few years later that Ambrose was not just offended but sickened by WWE asking him to mention Reigns in this Capacity Rollins also had a similar viewpoint and he felt like the few between himself and Ambrose was in bad taste and didn't need to Unfold the way it did and number one Rick flair on the page in Charlotte flair segment I wwe went too far when they decided to include read flair's name in a contract signing segment between Paige and Charlotte flair Their segment took place back in 2015 and Paige would deliver the line your little baby brother He didn't have much fight in him Did he read flair with Charlotte's younger brother and he sadly passed away in 2013 following an overdose This line quite rightly offended all members of the flair family including the legendary Rick flair Rick was rather public in the fact that he wasn't happy with WWE for using his son's name in this disgusting manner They even added that they didn't even ask his permission to name drop his son in the segment itself Stated I never heard a word about it. I started crying when I was watching Nobody called me and no one called me today So I mean that would indicate that they just assumed that that's good, but they have it for WWE wrestlers who took personal offense. I know People are still not really rocking with Rick with you know things that came out as a as a late of this year as a reason of this year, but That's just Yeah, that's not what's up, like that's y'all brothers I don't even remember that segment, but that's kind of that's scummy I wouldn't even want to say that and it's it's interesting because in WWE if you don't want to do certain things and you don't have that type of political power in the back they'll start de-pushing you they'll start having you and They'll start booking you in awful matches and situations where you look bad where your character takes a nosedive on television They'll do that WWE has been known to do that. Oh, if you don't want to play ball Fine, we'll just make it to the point where no one would actually see you on TV or even care about you like that So that that last one despite what Ric Flair has done in the past That's still kind of scummy in my personal opinion. So comment down below. Let me know what a segment from this video kind of I Guess you could say disturbed you the most or shocked you the most me the Ric Flair segment that that's Come on, but they could have did anything else to spark up a brawl That's kind of that's it's kind of messed up in my personal opinion But I appreciate all love and support roads to 70k appreciate y'all kicking me. See y'all next one