Hello, everybody and welcome to the Wednesday live stream So these the type of live streams that I'd love to do and the reason is is because it's one of those days When things are just lining up, it's actually a very positive day and a very bullish day now yesterday Of course a little bit turbulence, right? We had a Binance step down Looks like the Department of Justice came in and said look you're guilty of anti-mundering laws And we're going to do a plea deal and it's going to cost you and we were expecting some massive turmoil But this is a recap and everybody knows these things because they just can't get enough this information This is what actually happened. So of course CZ Binance stepped down CZ is gonna have to pay $50 million which is not a bad deal So the fact that he is I believe he is a his net worth is over $10 billion So dropping the bucket, this is the price of doing business and here we go So the Binance broke US anti-money laundering and sanction laws failed to report more than a hundred thousand suspicious transactions with organizations And I'm not here to defend or to say that's you know something that just goes above and beyond the Department of Justice These are the real allegations. I'm not gonna sugarcoat it. It's not like these centralized exchanges are doing You know the most perfect work of all time. They have moved the crypto Market forward, but there was a cost do that and this is that cost Exchange also never reported transaction with websites of all your selling child abuse materials one of the largest recipients of ransomware They said so again take that with a grain of salt could be true could not be true It could be somebody to talk about also I will remind everybody that senator Elizabeth Warren just recently talked about and in a house hearing committee where There was nothing but of Funding for Hamas the terrorist group and it was all done by crypto and digital assets And it is the most evil thing of all time when in reality we knew we know that cash is king for cartel and of course insurrectionist so Take that with a grain of salt Binance made it easy for criminals to move their stolen funds and illicit proceeds on exchanges They did just they didn't they did more than just failed to comply with federal law It pretended to comply. All right, great So that's what we got Binance is gonna pay 1.81 billion within 15 months and a further 2.51 billion forfeiture as part of the deal Prosecutor said and then Janet Yellen actually came out and said this is the largest Fine that they've they've ever put out in US history. So hey, we're making records all over the place fantastic So we heard about this CZ came in and said yes, this is true I'm gonna step down and we were expecting some major volatility and of course I don't need to tell you this but Didn't really do too much for the market in general and this I have to tell you makes if this didn't crash the market For the allegations that were going on and for the CEO to step down and for the provisions that are gonna come in I don't know what's gonna crash it because it's looking pretty damn good and in 24 hours Bitcoin went down in a paltry 1.5 percent and One point. I think it was that I want to say 37.5 when I'm at 35 5 so it was like a $2,000 difference the theorems actually up in 24 hours up 2% Of course BNB is down 12% not surprising. What is not surprising either is that the other? Crypto tokens for different exchanges are also are also up because they're taking advantage of the situation That's the market, baby. So on is up so on is actually don't slide down. Excuse me 12% for the week, but it had a massive run pullbacks are healthy not a big deal 12% if you're in traditional finance you Might have soiled yourself, but 12% is a Wednesday here in crypto. Welcome to digital assets Avalanche is down polygon everything's down except for like I said uniswap now that Binance is out of the way people are like, maybe we should look into decentralized exchanges I'm telling you right now uniswap is great, but there's better deck. There's better decks is out there By far I just used orca today. Well, this is like my second time using orca built on Solana, man Super fast super easy super slick Okay be up 1.3% and so on and so forth Kronos Crypto comm token is up to which is not surprising Thor chain 8% as well immutable X gaming token up 3 4 for Ave rocket pool, I guess so Celestia which what crypto students been talking about for quite some time about half a percentage point and then down we go Kava and look at this one. Pythe is up almost 39% in Seven days in the last is this an hour an hour? It's up 13% good news. We're gonna talk about that in a bit, but That's all we have as far as The market this makes me extremely bullish because I could have sworn that we would have seen a lot more volatility but we did not and again if that's not gonna do it what is and There was different sentiment across the crypto verse From everybody's thanking CZ Dan Moorhead. You had Tom crown actually, you know putting in and said hey Look, you've done an amazing job and a lot of people said it like this is you know Thanks so much for doing what you did. This is fantastic But then you had some other ones like Corey from swan Bitcoin and also from Bob Lucas Just put another video. I highly recommend you watch it and he said now that the final crypto scammer of the 2018-22 cycle is prosecuted it's time to legitimize the scamming and There is no shortage of opinions in here in crypto world, but that's what it is but Speaking of opinions that I think has to be fleshed out Bitcoin ETF because One of the big problems with this spot ETF is we all know it's Gary Guelph and one of his big problems from what he says is Manipulation and a lot of people had settled for quite some time that if Binance was the largest centralized exchange in the world It is four times the volume of its closest for competitors Or it's nice. Excuse me. It's more volume than four of its competitors Globally then they're not going to allow it because there's too much manipulation that can actually be done with the price true You cannot manipulate Bitcoin itself Mutable ledger Massive amount of nodes out there massive amount of miners to actually work and and secure the network You can't do it that way, but you can manipulate the price and that's what Gary again. So supposedly has been an issue with now with this new piece coming out From the DOJ Maybe The ETF will be approved. So this is from John Reed Stark and who's John Reed Stark? He is From John Reed Stark consulting da-da-da Duke University great, but he's the former chief SEC office of Internet enforcement and let me tell you he loves him some SEC Nothing wrong with that. I love my ex-employers, too But he said right here he goes out of the press's unsealed memorandum regarding plea proceedings of Binance and and CZ Instituting a mammoth set of conditions and requirements and I read through the whole thing I linked the description. You can check it out. It's like a 20 page or something like that But the one that's that makes the that really sticks out to me was number five Defendant Binance will appoint an independent compliance monitor for a period of three years to ensure Binance's compliance with the terms of the plea agreement and Report to the government. That's the US government. And who do you think he's gonna report to he's gonna report to the CFTC by the DOJ And of course the SEC can listen as well and and of course get all their documentation Which would satisfy I think what Gary's big problem was which was the largest centralized exchange Could be used to manipulate the price and now that America has its grubby little fingers into it Maybe that's not the case So that to me I had to sit back and go man Maybe the thesis that I have that the ETF will not be approved And it could actually very well not be or be approved because of this little piece right here And also on the same day this is from Bitcoin news definitely a follow of Bitcoin news com over on the X or Twitter and Here we are Hester Pierce One of the commissioners Comes out again and says hey Because of what's happening behind the scenes. There's no reason For us to stand in the way of a spot Bitcoin ETF. Let me say that again Hester Pierce One of the commissioners of the SEC one of the five Says there's no reason for us to stand the way of a spot Bitcoin ETF now before everybody gets super excited She said this all the whole time And I just want to put it in there just to reiterate that you know Even though we look at the SEC is like some evil Empire that's screwing everything up some of the things are doing is actually on the level and that's not very popular opinion But watch the video yesterday. I'll explain myself But on this piece right here Hester Pierce has never wavered from that stance She says if you're going to approve a futures ETF There's no reason why I shouldn't approve a spot Bitcoin ETF because it's the same pricing and of course you want to manipulate that You can manipulate a futures ETF. You can manipulate a spot. It doesn't really matter and This is one of those things that people say well now that that's of course we have this and the spot ETFs gonna happen I think I am more inclined to say that actually will but There's this little voice in my head and You know, I've been wrong on this channel.  Gary in the pocket of black rock and the money mongers that are out there and the asset managers at the control this planet or is he in the pocket of say The White House and different senators This is from Caitlin long and she posted this From custodia bank Wall Street veteran and everybody knows her. She's a big Bitcoin believer And she says it I didn't know this was actually a thing, but apparently it is truth revealed Senator was with Warren orchestration of operation to choke point 2.0, which we're not familiar with that That's what they try to shut down the banks that are dealing with the different centralized exchanges for for crypto Financial assets to allow people to have it as an on and off ramp and shut them down They did a beautiful job not more than six months ago But she says through her control over the Biden administration financial services appointees really about rolling out a US CVDC I had no idea she was that big in the CVDCs. This has been an open secret and DC since January, but it's not a secret anymore This is a minute long it's important that you listen to this so you understand Where Elizabeth Warren is coming from where a lot of people I think are coming from that are in Congress right now Because she's a bullhorn Unfortunately, that's just how it is. So just take a listen to this You make the decision take a listen banks do wrong if you Think we can improve that in a digital world the answer is sure you could but in that case Let's do a central bank digital currency. Are you there? Oh for a central bank digital currency. Yes. I think it's time for us to essentially because we're you know The thing is when you look at every piece of paper currency we issue not with coins, but every paper currency has its own identity So essentially we're prepared for the blockchain now With with currency should that be how we build this so I think of it as again What's the problem you're trying to solve and if the problem you're trying to solve is fast almost Frictionless ability to send money Across the country do it rapidly send it around the world be able to send it to your cousins in Argentina if that's what you're trying to solve a central bank digital currency does that and You don't really need a stable coin for that. You've already got a dollar Denominated you don't really need a Bitcoin to be able to get so then the question becomes So what is it that the Bitcoin what problem is it solving for and now we get into a very different space? The problem we're trying to solve is you That's the thing So when you hear things like this from Senator Elizabeth Warren, and you're gonna hear this from other congressmen and women senators They're gonna say the same thing like maybe we should do a CBDC Because that's the the next big thing. That's what's gonna push us over That's them not understanding the whole system of what Bitcoin is here for Bitcoin is here and digital assets We'll just we'll stick with Bitcoin and make it simple right now is to get out of the system the way and the and in the manner in which inflation actually happens is the private tax that they do Printed by the US Treasury Comes out to us and it dilutes the value of the dollar over time and that's what we're trying to get out of That's the evil that she's talking about but she thinks that a CBDC which really is really no different than I mean It's essentially digital dollar. It's the same thing going over again in zeros and ones On a distributed ledger, which only is me very distributed. So again when you take a look at this This is just one of those it's just first of all you can say it's education, but it's not education I think Elizabeth Warren knows exactly what she's talking about and I think she knew exactly what she was talking about When she stood up on that congressional hill and she talked about how that Bitcoin digital assets were used to fund Hamas and terrorist attacks and That is why we need to shut it down when in actuality when it won all the experts came out said no They've been using banks like your buddy's over.  She's not But they've been using banks and cash is king if you're the cartel and your terrorist So these types of things are the things that that stopped me by saying, you know, what as far as like a spot Bitcoin It's yeah, it looks very positive Could actually happen It's a lot more assured that it could actually happen if we're able to monitor we like I'm in part of the government To monitor finance, but will it actually happen? Not when you have something like that And I think that's one of the things that they can get over that last boss. I Think we'll see a bit coins. Yeah Hey, let me know what you think about that in the comments section then To finish up oracles and chain link. Well, not this oracle this oracle this is called pipe fight thought network and I linked it in the description and The only reason I was interested in this actually is because I was a great video from Paul Barone network and he put out about Solana airdrops I'm like, oh airdrops the fastest way to get scammed because let's be honest When you do airdrops everybody's clicking the wrong link and they're they're open up their hot wall and they're getting screwed over So whatever else, but I just wanted to watch it because I'm Kind of interested in the space and it was pretty interesting what they were doing as far as like an oracle how they're actually getting into and Into these different chains and it's built on Solana, which everybody seems to love right now I even know everybody hated it when it was nine bucks, but whatever and It's just a multi-chain asset that can be used on BNB optimism aetherium arbitram you name it that's the oracle for everybody and We'll see how it goes. So now while I was just interested. I'm like, oh, this is awesome an airdrop Let me just check it out and here's the here was the criteria So I'm like I always feel like oracles you need an oracle You need an oracle what it does is it pulls outside data price action You kind of do what you need in the real world into the blockchain the blockchain can't just pull stuff out of the air It needs help needs an oracle and chain link is why I've been buying it for the last truth since I got into crypto Actually in 2018-2019 I started And I've always liked this one and I was that well, this is the big one But now with Pyth out there and again watch the video from Paul is a great job. It's it's making up ground It's making up ground fast. So here's what's happening an airdrop program We know on web 3 over 90,000 wallets will be eligible to see Pyth tokens token tokens Jesus selling Janet Yellen Pyth tokens based on their on-chain activity across 27 blockchains and 200 decentralized applications Update November 16th the claim process for Python network retrospective airdrops will open on Monday November 20th That's just two days ago and remain open to eligible Participants until February 18 2024. Well, that's awesome Rob. So how does this work out? Well, here's the criteria in DeFi community member blah blah blah I linked this in the description so you can check it out and I was like hey I'm gonna check this out because this is the official link from Pyth dot network from their official website Let me see what's going on want want Sorry loser American You're unable you unavailable for legal reasons the site's not available for Congo, Korea I can't pronounce that Luan's people's Republic China Ukraine Ukraine now, okay Cuba, Iran, Libya, Samoa, Sudan and South Syria the USA the UK Yemen Zimbabwe and da-da-da, so I Can't check it and I'm not gonna tell you to use a VPN because that is illegal and you should not do that VPNs are dangerous But if you want to use one there's a link in the description anyhow You should not do that to check for your airdrops just saying And then pipe just so you know I thought it's pretty interesting because they're doing the airdrop and it just came out It just like a pop up up up up up up up up 20th November That was Monday when they do the airdrop that was because you can't go back anymore So it's our 30 cents and right now it's 43 cents So just so you know that might be something to look into now the the thing that will That will put a monkey wrench in the tolls applies 10 billion not a big deal You know But Shane like is like 580 million But then again Cardano's like 45 billion So just that will affect the price just so everybody knows but this is a very risky play It is an altcoin, but I thought it was very interesting like oh another Oracle that's out there fantastic So take that as you see fit now me personally I will not lead you astray I bought some today and you know how I bought it because I couldn't use an airdrop I Use orca and of course if you like what the hell is that orca And every one of these these cryptas that are out there anyone that you want to get into of course You have to do your own research as much as you possibly can not that you're gonna get it right every time That's the thing with investing remember I put rules for a reason underneath me Don't invest more you can afford to lose it's all gone right everything is scammed up your mother wise don't leave things on exchanges Da-da-da So here if I'm over on Coingecko if I click on markets I can see all the different centralized and decentralized exchanges This is available on there's this one called orca orcas run on Solana I used it and I got to tell you super impressed and I tweeted that out very fast very easy The fees were nominal I mean next to nothing which is a huge difference Between that and say using like a uniswap for the aetherium gas fees. I mean just Unbelievable and of course I had to transfer Some Solana into my phantom wallet to because it integrates with my phantom wall which is Solana wallet And it took less than 10 seconds to transfer it over now aetherium. Yeah, never know and it's gonna cost It's I'll just say this is very simple. So check out Pythe. I bought some So if you think oh, Roger's a nice guy talking about some crypto now Rob owns it and Rob is biased. All right and That's it. So for that piece and then also a little bit of Jarring news to wake everybody up remind everybody of this Justin Sun Founder of Tron put out a tweet about four hours ago and said HTX and Heco cross-chain bridge Underwent a hacker attack HTX will fully compensate for HTX's hot wallet losses. So another exchange goes down Well, excuse me. It doesn't go down. Just they're just they're hot wallet But this is the second one that he's been involved in where it's had a hack Deposits and withdrawals temporarily suspended all funds and HTX are secure in the community can rest assured We are investigating the specific reasons for the hacker and I think let me see here Once we complete investigation done by the cause we will resume services now to be fair Justin Sun did say that he is going to personally and I end up personally But the business itself is going to refund everybody if they if there's any loss of funds But he said that before on the other centralized exchange that he was a part of I forgot the name of it Correct me the comment section But again, these are the things that worry me and it doesn't worry me because I got it figured out I think I made these rules remember for a reason See that that third rule rule number three No exchanges you have to use the exchanges To be an off in an on-ramp, right? But you don't have to leave it there. You paid the fees now take it off so Did we not learn a lesson from Mount Gox? I know I didn't because I put stuff on Voyager in Celsius Did we not learn our lesson from Voyager in Celsius and FTX and block fight? Well, apparently not and that's just how it is I understand some people have to leave crypto on the exchanges because they're trading They're doing all the the things they're doing But you don't have to leave it on there You can take it off put in cold storage while I made plenty of videos There's a great website called Dan teaches crypto shows you how to do it for free. So I Just want you to be safe. That's it I don't want to keep hearing these these these stories about all I got screwed over and I left it all on the exchange Why did anybody tell me? I don't have to 90% of you are sick of hearing this message But the 10% I think you need to hear this and this is and the reason is because if you're gonna work this hard It's not how much you make it's how much you keep right in that vein people will say well What's a good cold storage wallet? I use this one. I Use tangent I use ledger and I use ellipel because I'm going to diversify in my portfolio I'm gonna diversify my cold storage walls, right? But so far since this one was created in tangent in 2018. No hacks ledger. No hacks ellipel no hacks now to be fair ledger did have personal data hacks But that's what every website has essentially, but there's been no hacks of your crypto So people when asking me like Rob. I only got so much money. How do I do this? Well, tangent itself Let me show you For a three-card set at 62 bucks for two cards. It's under 50 bucks and I did a video Links in the description. I show you how to set it up and there and then these These tangent wallets now the ones that I have this I have this one right here, which is the old the old version But the ones that you're gonna get These new versions right here. It's got an I got the new set and what those do those allow you to either put the private keys within the Card itself or the private keys that you can generate a mnemonic phrase and write down a piece of paper It's whatever you want to do now. It's whatever you want to do. It gives you both options I personally have them all in the cards and that's it But as a comparison just so you know if you're looking for a cold storage wallet This is the black Friday offer for ledger. I do not have a link to ledger But it's shop.ledger.com the price is seventy nine bucks for the old version 150 for The newer version and then the nano duo is 228 where you get to a twofer So those are the price differences. I use all I use both are all three with the ellipal and to make things crystal clear Tangent is not a sponsor of my of my show. They are not They didn't pay me to say this However, that's an affiliate link if you can't stand using a feeling screen 10% off. Just go to shop down or tangent What is it? tangent Com and hopefully go the right place But if you want to support that there it is right there and that's it for today. So look That's it for today in the news and what's going on. I think it's super bullish I mean, I haven't been this bullish in quite some time and this I didn't think we're gonna get here until we got into Bitcoin having territory and we're only like four and a half months away. So I think this is pretty good time We'll see how everything works out of macro, but that's it for the news If you like today's video give it a thumbs up consider subscribing everything we talk about is time sensitive as things accelerate And they will accelerate very quickly. It's important that you stay up to date I don't care if it's me or somebody else to just subscribe to somebody watch the news See what's happening so you can make the best decision for you and your family. That's it


Hi everyone, Joe for jaskiescasegrakes.com with a random number block randomizer for That group of teams right here There you go everyone. I think most people know how this works by now if you don't it's all in the item description check that out So it's basically a serial number break Just for this group of teams and just for pick your team 15 which is coming up in a separate video after this big Thanks for these folks for getting into it. There are the numbers right there. Let's roll it Let's randomize it one and a two three times for each list one two and three After three times we've got mark down to a couple errands one and two three times for the numbers one two and three Got three down to zero now members zero gets any and all redemptions including one of one redemptions, but It's flawless. So there aren't redemptions except for those blockchain cards So Aaron you still have a shot at those blockchain cards for that group of teams right there Make that tab down there in the bottom All right Including one of ones Frank you'll still get it live one of ones mark with three Aaron with seven Greg with two or eight Stephen K. You got to Franklin with one four and six Ed with five Aaron with nine and zero So let's sort this by number right here coming up in a separate video will be the flawless break itself. Jasper's case breaks calm


Team keep it clean. What's going on? It's engraving here with another video. Every time I have two earpieces, two headphones in, I feel like I'm missing out on stuff. I feel like I can't really hear everything going on. And then like when I have my glasses on, I feel like I can't see everything around me. I feel like when I look to my, when I'm looking at my peripheral, when I have my glasses on, I feel like I can't see. Anyway, Team keep it clean. Another episode of NFL Questions from subscribers. For those of you that actually get this notification, hopefully it goes out. Knowing YouTube, it probably won't, but we'll see. But anyway, this question came from my guy, 410 Byron. Very good question. Don't be asked this question yet, which I'm surprised. Oh, it actually looks like the notification went out. Wow. I'm actually shocked. I'm shocked. Anyway, oh, you got it.  Wow, that's crazy. Thank you, YouTube. But anyway, he asked a really good question. He asked, can this this offense, this current Ravens offense be better than the one that we had in 2012? Now, at first, when I first saw his question, I went, got the video set up, got ready and everything. And I put up, y'all got the notification? Great, great, great, great. That's a good sign. Oh, you always get notifications. Well, we'll see at seven.  We'll see at seven. If when I stream at seven o'clock, Eastern time, we'll see. We will see if you get that notification because usually that one, that's the one that nobody ever gets. But anyway, can this offense be better than the Ravens 2012 offense? Now, Purple City was going on, everybody coming through. He first asked the question. I read it, but I didn't read it. So I thought he was asking, can the Raven roster be better than the 2012 Ross? So maybe we should do that later on. We should do that video later on. But first, we're going to start off with the offense. Now, the offense. Oh, he said, y'all, enjoy when we start streaming. Not this time. Hopefully not, not again, but see. So can the Ravens offense be better than it was in 2012? Joe Flacco and just when you say that name and Quam Bolton, that's none of those receivers on our team right now. Well, I know some of them are rookies. So I can't take, I can't say them yet because they just coming, they're just coming on. But Crabtree compared to Bolton, Bolton, John Brown compared to Bolton, Bolton, Willie Snead compared to Bolton, Bolton, Chris Moore compared to Bolton, Bolton. So right then and there, and Bolton was better. Well, Crabtree, we'll see how he does with the Ravens. We'll see how he does. So I'm going to hold out for him. But for the rest of the guys, Bolton is like better than all of them like combined. So that's no question there. But Bolton was that deal, man. So that's, and we only talked about two people really talked about Flacco and Bolton so far. That's a lot to compare to me. But Flacco, Bolton, Tory Smith catching all them deep passes. If we get the deep ball back, we'll see. But that's tough. Jacoby Jones helping on offense and also with the kick return again. Well, no, he said offense though. So we only sticking with offense. What's up Zach? So offense, tough off already. Ray Rice. Ray Rice. Ray Rice. So far Ray Rice has been better than Alice Collins, but Alice Collins only been playing one year. So I got to give it time. But Ray Rice, I think he's been the best back in Baltimore history. Jamal Lewis was a beast too. It's like they're right there and you could argue your case for either one. But I go with Ray Rice just because he could do more. Ray Rice could do more. But Ray Rice, Bernard Pierce, who was the other guy?  We had Vonte Leach, right? So it's tough. I mean that roster, man. We were stacked. We were stacked on off. That roster was stacked. Let's just stick to the offense because I keep on complete roster, but I got to remember engraving stick to the offense. Stick to the offense. Don't go off on the whole roster. Stick to the offense. So let's talk about that first. Make sure I leave a like on the video too. Um, yes, the tight ends. Um, my boy JV Smoog just mentioned Dennis Pitta, Joe Flacco's the lead and Ed Dixon. Yes. Um, I think tight end, we may be able to be better there.  So this is all just seeing. Well, I mean, this is all just, uh, just, just imagining, just thinking of how it can be. So tight ends, I think we may, we may have an opportunity to be better at tight end than we were at that year, but it'll still be tough because, because Pitta was doing his thing. Dixon helped out, helped out, helped out a lot too. Um, so there's that offensive line. I said, I think this could be one of the best offensive lines, offensive lines in Raven's history. Shout out to my boy, Meach, because every time I say that, I remember when he said, oh, that's a real hot, that's a real hot take. But, oh, Grim say no chance. It's a chance. It's a chance. But we'll see. Uh, that offensive line, we had Blindside, we had Brian McKinney, we had Matt Burke, we had Marshal Yanda, and we had Kalecheo Simile. I'm like, wow. Thinking about that, that's crazy. That is freaking crazy. That's crazy. All offensive line was beasts, man. They were beasts. They were beasts. We had like, wow. Not that I think about it, man. We had those guys on the, along the offensive line. Wow. Yanda, Kalecheo Simile, Blindside, Brian McKinney, and Matt Burke. Wow. That offensive line was nice. But yeah, that was it. That was our offense. We named everybody, and pretty much, and of course, some backups too. But yeah, we ran the ball well. I mean, we did get lucky with Flacco 4-29 play. Got very lucky with that, that worked out for us though. That team was, that team was nice, man. They did their thing. Oh yeah, Ray Rice, he was just, he was phenomenal. He was phenomenal. You want to see what Dixon does? We all do. I think we all do. We want to see what he does for a whole year. So, wow. Oh, but I didn't even, we didn't even answer the question yet. But can our offense now be better than they were in 2012 in the Super Bowl season? Still got Flacco. Who's left from the offense? Flacco and Yanda. Flacco and Yanda. 4th and 29, if they don't get it, no Super Bowl. Yeah, man. It's crazy how just one play can have such a big impact, man. One play. Ray Rice would have been the Hall of Fame if he didn't punch. That's true. He would have, yeah, he made it there. He was a beast, man. But yeah, it's only Flacco and Yanda left. They'd only two, and hardball, of course, but that's coaching-wise. But yeah, on the offense, it's only Flacco and Yanda. That's it. That is it. But can we do it? Of course, Flacco, Lamar Jackson, RG3. Okay, still got Flacco. He is, what, five, six years older. So he's five, six years. Sometimes he does the same stuff he did in his rookie year recently, but so he's a little older. When he gets hot, he gets hot. When he's not, he's not. So Flacco didn't change. He's in the same quarterback. Who else? No, they could definitely be stopped, T-Band. They could definitely be stopped in 2012, especially against them Texans. But who else? What's up, Humble? Alex Collins. Alex Collins to Ray Rice. We'll see what Alex Collins does this year, because he started off, he had a great year last year. Didn't even start for a good amount of the time. Fullback, we got Patrick Ricard. He is similar to Avante Leach, because he's not the speedy fullback. He's not like juice. We miss juice. I miss juice, man. I miss juice. But Patrick Ricard, he's been fine for a fullback. Who else? Yeah, that game was ugly. That Texans game was nasty, nasty. The Jaguars game last year was worse, but that Texans game was nasty. Because we had to wake up a little earlier to see the Ravens get whooped last year. Yeah, yeah, much better receiving college. But that's what I said. I can't really compare it to. Well, I mean, born from 2012 to this year, we're comparing them. But at the same time, for their careers, you can't compare them yet, because they appreciate that perfect one. You can't compare them yet, because Ray Rice, of course, he became a veteran. He just started killing it, man. Shout out to with us, McGay, he too, for helping Ray Rice, man. We had some nice combos at running back. That is one thing we have usually always been able to have a nice one is a running. But he said, don't even remind me of that. Yeah, that was nasty, man. We got but yeah, Ray Rice to Atlas Collins. Atlas Collins been nice, but yeah, he got to get better catching out of the backfield. But yeah, but no, this is our backup. So now our backup will be Kenneth Dixon from what everybody says will be fine. But I just want to see him show it. I want to see him prove me. I'm just tired of all the um, I'm tired of the only thing I've heard. I'm hearing about Kenneth Dixon is what he has potential to do. I want to see him actually do it. Broncos first game. Oh yeah, when Broncos did, they came to Baltimore and beat us, I believe, right? Yeah, they came to Baltimore and they must have knew something. He must have knew something because they're going to say, he said, we're going to see those guys again. He said, we're going to see those guys again and guess what happened? We saw those guys again and we played probably the most stressful Ravens game ever. That was the most stressful Ravens game ever. Oh, that was tough. But I don't know, man. I don't know. That's a tough question. Can the roster right now be better than the 2012 Ravens offense? We won't know until they get there. Um, what's up, George? We won't know until we get there. But man, that is a tough one because that team, that offense, they did what they had to do, man. They did what they had to do. Most hurtful Ravens game was the Bengals last year? No, man. Most hurtful game? No, Patriots. Patriots from the year before 2011. Ain't nobody touching that. And nobody touching that. No games are touching that. None. And I don't ever want to go through that again. But I mean, that's the price of success because if you get to the player, once you lose, that's it. So I would mean I would rather them get to the playoffs than not. But no, the Patriots and, and no, yeah, that that game, not even a, there wasn't even a drop. He had it stripped. But yeah, nothing comes close to the the AFC Championship game from 2011. That Bengals game last year, that sucked the fourth and 12, but it was nothing, absolutely nothing. That was minuscule. That was my new minute. That was just, that was nothing compared to the Patriots and Ravens, the AFC Championship game. But I don't know, on paper, on paper, can the, on paper, can the, right now, can the offense be better? I don't, on paper, right now, at running back, I guess, because he can get some yards. Offensive line, they could do some damage too. Michael Crabtree, both in both possession receivers. We'll see how that, how, who ends up being a number two, number three guys, or what these need, I'm sure it's going to be the number three, maybe even number two, but they're going to have them in a slot a lot. See if John Brown could connect with Flacco on the deep passes. Tight ends, I think we'll get better production there. And based off of the rules too, the rules favor the offense, but yeah, Crabtree is our number one. He's our number one guy, possession guy. I don't know, man. I don't know. It's tough. It's such a, such a tough call. He's been on his streams for, oh no, it ain't nothing, man. I just read Michael Blackman comment, man. Somebody said, the only issue they had with Bowden, let me go scroll back up. I think it was Marcus one second, man. One second, one second. Oh, my only issue with Bowden was that he would disappear in some games. Well, in the Broncos game, he disappeared, period. Everybody disappeared in that one. But off the top of my head, I can't really remember any games that he disappeared in. I'm not saying that he didn't disappear, but I can't remember if he did. What's the chance that Perryman has a thousand yards? Well, it depends on what, it depends on what type of thousand yards, like a thousand practice yards receiving, or a thousand yards that he's in laps, or I mean, it just all depends, man. Oh man, y'all boys, killing, killing Perryman in the communist section, but killing him. I don't know. I don't know. That's tough, man. That's so tough. Off the top of my head, I would have to say no, but I mean, we won't know till we know. Do we have a chance? Yeah, they got a chance. If they can just, if they can make, if they can get the deep ball, I think the deep ball, can we have a top 10 receiving group? Can we have a top 10 receiving group? That would shock a lot of people, including myself, if we did.  A lot starts with Flacco, starts with the offensive line. No, starts with the offensive line, then there's Flacco, of course, there's the receivers, there's Marty. Yeah, I mean, so, so many different, there's so many different factors. There's so many different factors that play a part. So, I mean, we'll see. We, it's a possibility, but all in fact, you got to click, man. The running game, of course, will be big, but I really, like the, the deep pass, I miss it for a lot of different reasons. But when we had the deep ball, offense was just so much better. So much better. You know what I'm saying? When Perryman leaves the room, the enemy goes, okay, y'all look crazy. Um, yeah, we, we just, when we get the deep ball back, that, that just helps the offense. That helps the team so much, man. Do you think Lamar Jackson can be like Dag Prescott? I don't want him to be like Dag Prescott. I want him to be better. I don't want him for his first year starting to have a great season and then the next year, he just turned into so-so. So no, this is a question from some, I did see a question that you sent me on, on Twitter. I didn't do it yet. I didn't do it yet. When you, when you see a scene or red, whatever it's called in Twitter, I think it says, scene, then that would mean that I, I'm doing it or I'll do it very soon. So say if he, if he's Lamar Jackson, he's already better. Uh, yeah, they keep the defense on it totally. Um, because we could run a, oh, we, I mean, there's a possibility that we could have it, man, because we could, if we get the, if we have a good running game again this year, and we actually have a legitimate passing, legitimate passing threats, which we really didn't have much of last year. I mean, that the only person that people were kind of scared of was Mike Wallace, but Mike Wallace was just, um, oof. He said this year Lamar Jackson will have more catchers than Brishab, Harry, man. Wow. Um, but last year, Mike Wallace was just, he was another 50-50 guy, man.  Um, so we'll see, man, but this is a good question. This is a good question, tough question. I can't even answer. Can't even answer, but I don't know. Dude, QB sets. We'll see how that goes, man. All right, the Ravens can go back to the Super Bowl if the Ravens start Lamar Jackson. The Ravens rookie wide receivers and tight end step up, and most importantly, the Ravens defense. I'd say that James Meredith, you don't think you can do it with Flack? I'm just curious. I just, I'm just curious why you're seeing that. Um, he said Mike will disappear. Oh, Mike Wallace. Oh, yeah. That's, that's definitely true. Oh, you think Elliott is good? I haven't heard anything about him yet. We'll see though, man. It's too early. Um, too early. James, you still in here, man? They say Lamar may tank at the NFL level. Hopefully not. Yeah. Probably going to say Flack goes our best option this year. Yeah, man. We're going to see, man. I hope we'll see the John Brown commandant for themselves. We want to get behind them. We want the city behind them. We want that support. It seemed like people really love Snead, man. Really love Snead. Um, I mean, Wes went to the Saints, but now they're saying he didn't go to the Saints. They're saying he didn't officially agree yet. So I don't know, man. We'll see. Hey, I enjoyed, appreciate you, man. Enjoy. Um, so yeah, we'll see. Anyway, this is a good question, man. It's a fun question. So I will be streaming about probably another like hour and a half. Um, yeah, I did read about that, Marcus. We talked about that in the video too early. Oh, yeah, you would ever. But, um, I'll be streaming again in about an hour and a half, maybe two hours. Appreciate y'all coming through or maybe about two and a half hours, something like that. But make sure again, you got your notifications turned on, turn them off, then turn them all, then turn them all on so you can receive a notification for all the videos. Um, cause that for that stream, when we do it in a couple hours, I think YouTube usually sends that one out. Yeah, they usually send that one out, but it's around when we do it around seven Eastern time when they don't send it out. So around seven Eastern time come through. Um, cause I should be streaming there. So just trying to give y'all heads up. Appreciate you. He said he watched the first team and learned what not to do. Appreciate y'all, man. I'll see y'all next time. I'm out.


What's up everyone, Takedown here. Welcome back to another video. Today, I'm going to be showing you guys how to replace the power supply on the PlayStation 3 Slim. And it's honestly really easy to do. You don't need that many tools, but there is a few things that you will definitely need. The first thing that you will need is a Phillips head screwdriver or a Star screwdriver. This here is a smaller one. It's just for the screws to take out. You are going to also want to have security bits. Now you can get these off of Amazon. They're really useful for a lot of different consoles and stuff. The one you need is a T8, but if you're already going to be paying 10 bucks for just a single one, you might as well get the whole set for around $10. In my opinion, that's a lot better of an option. And you also might want a flathead screwdriver or a crying tool. Now, if your PS3 has been opened plenty of times, even if it is just to clean it. You should be fine. It should just be able to pop off once you have all the screws out. First thing you're going to want to do is turn it over. And you're going to take off all the feets around it to see the screws below the top one here in the corner. This one actually, there is no screw under it, so you don't need to remove that.  You're going to take all of them off and you're going to put them off to the side. As you can see, I have already done that. I also have all of these screws out. So in here, all of the screws are going to be the same and they're going to be these long ones here. And you're going to remove them all and you're going to keep those. Then you are going to have the security screws. Security screws for the PS3 Slim right under this lip here. There's one here, one here, one here. And in some models, there's a fourth and it's on the corner here and you'll see those. They are black screws and it's going to be definitely hard to show you guys on camera. But it is a star bit. Of course, it won't even focus on it. There you go. See, it's kind of like a star bit. That's why you're going to need the T8 to be able to remove it. So that's just a little bit. You put it in a ratchet, take it out. It takes no time at all. The other thing that you might want to do if you're going to be opening it up is to remove the hard drive. For the purpose of this video, since it's the only power supply I'm going to be showing you guys, there's no reason to do it. It's super simple.  As you can see, mine's still in there. Take that out.  I don't need to show you guys that since we're just going to be dealing with the power supply in this video.  You are going to put your hands near the rear and you are going to with the top cut case here. It's easier to explain and then do it. You're going to pull it towards you and lift up at the same time. Now, if the ps3 has never been opened, this can be a little difficult. Try to be careful with it. It is thinner plastic, so it can stop very easily. But again, you're just going to put your fingers on the top case. You're going to pull it downward and up at the same time and it will pop off just like this and you're going to put that to the side as well. Now, here is the inside of the ps3 slim.  You have your fan and you have your power supply down here. Now, the power supply you can get off of Amazon. Kind of like a refurbished one. It's basically one where they pulled out of a working ps3 and the person on Amazon is just selling it. It's basically selling as refurbished. You can get them for between $11 and $20 free shipping if you have crime. Now, you can also get aftermarket. With me personally, I always stick with Sony Original. So as long as you can get one for cheap, it's fine. But remember, it's going to be used. It's not new. You can get a new aftermarket one for around the same price or sometimes a little bit less. So how the power supply works. There is a cable over here as you can see and there's one over here. So you're going to first remove the one on the right side of it.  You definitely don't want to rip it off of the pins here. We just want to lift it up there. And this side here is a little tab. You just punch the tab and it comes right out. There also is two screws, one on each side. That you will have to remove. They are the same as the other ones. Just your standard Phillips head screwdriver to take those out. And you're going to obviously want to save them. Now, with moving the wires away, you're going to grab the power supply and you're going to lift it straight up. Reason for this is on this corner here, there is pins. So it is basically a very long pin that goes up into the power supply. If you lift it up on an angle, it could damage or break those off. And then you're going to be in a lot of trouble. So it's easier just to do this. As you can see, if I lift it up gently here, this side here, the left side, it's not really looking like it's attached to anything. So again, what a lot of people do is they'll grab it once it's unscrewed and they'll rip it off like this. Problem is that will damage your pins here. So you want to lift it straight up. So you're going to put your fingers over here to kind of lift that up a little bit. And you're just going to wiggle the other side to try to unplug it just like that. So you can see here, this here, it is a long pin and it goes inside this part here on your power supply. Now, before replacing the power supply, before even ordering one, in my opinion, what I would do is simply check to make sure nothing looks like it's fried or burnt. You're going to check the connections, all the wires, where you can see the motherboard and make sure everything looks okay, looks fine. If it does, then as long as you have your replacements, you can go in and install it. You're basically going to reverse all the steps that I just shared with you. So again, to put it in, you're going to push it straight down. You don't want to put it on an angle. You want the pins to align to it and you're going to also watch out the cables because you don't want to pinch those in it too. So you're just going to start with this end and make sure it lines up well. And you're just going to move the cables out of the way and you're slowly going to push it down until it's all the way down. Then if the cables, you're going to start with the one over here. It is, in my opinion, the easiest one. You're going to push it straight down, make sure it clicks. This one here, you're going to push it over if I can get it. See, it is a little pain because it has to go right over and clip just like that. Then you are going to put the screws back in on each side. Once you have that done, all you have to do is put the cover on. You start with the front. You'll see the little lips there.  You put the security screws in first because they're easier and smaller so they can be lost easier. And then you're going to put all of your screws around it back in and then you're going to put the feet back on it and you are done. The last stuff that you're going to want to do obviously once you have it all put back together is connect it, turn it on and see make sure that it works. Make sure that you had the cables pushed in correctly. And as long as you have the cables pushed in correctly, the power supply is pushed all the way down. It will likely turn on. If not, just open it back up. Check to make sure you did everything properly. Maybe take the power supply out again and put it back in. Maybe it didn't seat rights and that is how you do it. So that is the quickest and easiest way to change the power supply and replace the power supply on the PlayStation 3 Slim. Super easy to do. Doesn't take no time at all. The only thing that you definitely need before even opening up your PS3 is these security bits. Again, you can get them off of Amazon for $10 for the set. All you really need is T8s, any other consoles, Xbox, things like that, even for Xbox controllers to open those up. I think it's T7. So it's better just to get a complete set and you can also get them where it's a longer bit as well. I have those as well. They're easier to use than these. These I don't use as much anymore, but for the PS3, they work perfect. So hope you guys enjoyed this video. I'll leave this video here. Please take care. Peace.


I'd like to hear something about the million dollar challenge, when it was put in place, approximately how often it's been challenged and how that all works. Well, it's sort of a fuzzy period in history. For a long time, it was a thousand dollar challenge. Sorry to 1968 when I was appearing on a radio program in New York City with a parapsychologist who has since then become a very good friend of mine, Stanley Kripner. He worked for the Saved Work Institute in San Francisco and Stanley is exceedingly naive and I've told him that many times so I'm not speaking badly about him at a distance or anything like that. He knows that I'm convinced he's quite naive, but he's basically very honest. He's naive to the extreme rather, I must say, but he's very honest and he has many positive experiments or so he believes. They don't stand the test of time. Unfortunately, well, that's what happens with parapsychology in general, but I believe he's very dedicated and very honest and I couldn't imagine that he would fake anything or misrepresent anything at all. At that time on that radio program, one of the people present, it might have been Stanley for all I remember, he said, why don't you put your money where your mouth is? And I said, okay, all right, I'll give a hundred dollars to any of these psychics who say, now this is 1968, that was a lot more money at that time. I don't know that I had a hundred dollars, but I hope I did because I'd hate to be dishonest. You know, I would never deceive anybody. But eventually, when it got to be known and people said, wow, you're really doing it off for a hundred dollars, I made it a thousand dollars. I didn't always have that thousand dollars. Then I eventually made it $10,000 and I made sure from that point on it was getting serious. I always made sure I had the $10,000 in the bank. I will admit to you that every now and then, I'd have to take a couple hundred dollars out of that, but I'd put it back within a matter of days. But generally speaking, the $10,000 was in the bank. Now, that grew over the years until Lexington Broadcasting syndication, they offered me a show that they wanted to call a $100,000 psychic prize. And I put in my $10,000, they put in 90. And so it was $100,000. That was a program with Bill Bixby as the host, as a matter of fact. And I've got to tell you one funny episode for that, the astrologer came along. And we put ads in newspapers and magazines all across the country. And we eventually centered it out. We dismissed the guy who said that he could fly by flapping his arms. He literally wanted to go to the window and show us right then. And we were on the 14th floor. So he decided we wouldn't witness that demonstration. Maybe in the next program, thank you. But the astrologer said that he could tell what sign somebody was born under. I won't get into what that means, but he said, if you get people out of the audience that are born under 10 different signs, or 12 different signs, I'm sorry. There are 12, you have to count to 12, yes. And they can prove it by their driver's license, you see, date of birth on it. He said, I will be able to sort them out into the 12 different signs of the zodiac. Well, we said as long as you don't ask them their birthday. No, no, I wouldn't ask them that. But he did ask some questions. I listened to part of it. When you see motion pictures, you prefer a mystery over a comedy. And if you're choosing colors to decorate a home, would you choose pastels rather than solid colors or white? And things like this, do you like hot foods or do you not like hot foods? And it went on and on like this. And at the end of that, he gave them little sealed envelope. Inside the sealed envelope was their zodiac sign. And if it said Virgo, it had the funny little V-shaped thing on it. And it said Virgo underneath it, and he'd given that, but it was sealed up. They didn't know what they'd gotten. And they went through all 12 like that. Announced at the end of it, he was quite confident he'd get 12 correct out of 12. And the way we did the thing is we had the 12 zodiac signs set up a very big set, big studio in Hollywood. Big studio, big set, and all 12 signs were there. The instructions were to the people, come out in a group, stand in the middle. Now open up your envelopes, look at the sign that's inside the envelopes, and go to that sign and stand under the little arch. And they all did that, and they'd look around, and they'd go over and stand under the arch. Okay, you're all there now, right. That's the sign that you were assigned to. If that's not the correct sign, go to the correct sign now. The other one of them moved and went to the right sign. One of the 12 is exactly what Chance would call for, to his credit. The astrologer told me that afterwards he said no. He realized maybe he didn't have the ability to do this, but astrology still works, you say, of course. But he didn't have the ability to do that. And gee, he really regretted that and couldn't quite understand it. Many years afterwards, he published something where he said, I found out why it didn't, they faked the driver's licenses. So how can you win? Well, that was $100,000. Then it became $1 million when people started to remind me, maybe $100,000 isn't all that attractive. And I thought, well, sorry, that's all we can manage. And $100,000, I only had $10,000 for that. No, we've got to expand it somehow. Then a gentleman, a very obviously wealthy gentleman came to me and he said, you should have more teeth to your challenge. And he said, I'll give you a million. I thought about that for 20 seconds. And I agreed that that would be a good idea. Gave us a check for $1 million. We deposited it in an interest-bearing account with Goldman Sachs. And the provision was that it was called the James Randi Challenge, James Randi Educational Foundation Challenge Fund. And it was stuck in there and we can't use it for anything. We can take the interest off the top at every year if we want. But we can't use it for anything except to award to a psychic who wins it. So it's isolated, it's there. And the people who say, oh, there's no million dollars running, we immediately send them the latest financial statement with what that right now amounts to before we take the interest off it at the end of the year. So it's there, it's been there for quite some years now. And I think it's probably going to be there for quite a while, to say the least. But we're prepared to give it up because we are legally bound to do exactly that. So when somebody makes a claim, he would have to make a formal claim stating three things, and this is very difficult for them to do. What he can do, under what circumstances, with what accuracy. And once we know that, we can design a test of that claim. And he has to agree that the test is fair and square. And then if he insists, if he wants it at all, we would have somebody else that we both trust to conduct the test. I was just wondering if anybody came close to the prize, like had you stumped for a while? Well, like I said a minute ago, it's like being pregnant if you are or you aren't, you know. No, the rules are drawn up in such a way and agreed to. They must be before we even start the test. That this will be the conclusion that will say, yes, this will be the one that says no. And it's very evident where there's no judging procedure. No one has to make up their mind or make a decision as to whether or not the person won the challenge. It's right there, it's like, I can fly. Okay, step to the window. You lose, it's that simple. You don't have to make a decision as to whether or not they won. And we will accept, well, that's interesting too, we will accept statistical results. If they say that I can do this, it should be done 12% of the time by chance alone. I can do it 40% of the time. Well, we will accept that if, depending on what the test is, of course, what the actual statistics are. But we will accept a statistical result. Now the psychiatrists are there saying, no, he won't do that, but we will.


Can an AI chatbot do omics data analysis? Many AI tools make bold claims. Julius.AI claims to do AI power data analysis. So I took a phosphoprogramics data set in the form of an Excel sheet like this and said, show me what you've got. It gave me a quick overview of the data, including some summary statistics, which is nice, but I have questions. Like, how many progences have at least one modification side within just a p-value better than 1 percent? It correctly answered 231. That's impressive, but can you create a volcano plot of the sites using the full change values from a certain column? It gave me this plot, which shows that it knows what a volcano plot is and figured out on its own what to put on the y-axis. Highlight the regulated sites. It correctly highlighted both the up and down regulated sites and asked for putting dotted lines with the cut-offs. It did that too. This is seriously impressive. Unfortunately, it's also seriously expensive.


Hi, I'm applying for doctoral studies in English literature and I want to know how important is it for students to communicate with professors in U.S. universities prior to applying for doctoral or PhD programs and what should such a communication entail? Okay, great question. This person is applying for English literature, a program of English literature and wants to know how appropriate communication is and what kind of communication is appropriate between the university and the department prior to submitting the application. That is a great question and I think while it varies from school to school, my experience with graduate programs is that it's important to be in contact with the professor that you're hoping to work with. A lot of times they accept only a few students each year to come into those doctoral programs to specifically work with them so it's important that they know you throughout the application process and know who you are and get an idea of how well the two of you would work together. So I would say especially for doctoral programs that's important and I would encourage it at Catholic for sure. Thank you, great advice.


the development of new drugs and improved understanding of tumor biology have significantly altered the management of breast cancer. Radical mastectomies, which had been the primary treatment for breast cancer for over a century, were based on the assumption that breast cancer was a local regional disease. Studies conducted in the 1970s showed that cancer cells could spread to the systemic circulation without passing through the regional lymphatic system, leading to multidisciplinary treatment of breast cancer. This included breast conserving surgery, BSC+, combined with axillary dissection, AD, systemic chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiation therapy in early stage breast cancer. Later clinical trials demonstrated that the breast could be preserved in those who responded well to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, NAC. In the early 1990s, sentinel lymph node biopsy, SLNB, was used to identify patients with early stage breast cancer, CN0, who would benefit from axillary dissection. This procedure was found to avoid the serious complication of lymphedema while still providing accurate staging information.


Hello everybody HoodedCoverCommander788 here and this is a quick look at Duke version 4 from 1993. I wanted to do a quick shot of this version of Duke because we did see him in this week's review and I wanted to give him his own spotlight. I do think this is an excellent figure except for the head. As you can see the head has a non-removable helmet and that is a problem for me. I don't even think it looks very good for these non-removable helmets. Those have been done better. So in the video I did a head swap with version 3 and I thought that looked pretty good. I probably overstated things when I said that just swapping out the head for version 3 on version 4 would make the perfect Duke action figure. Maybe not. I actually like the chest on version 3 better than version 4 as well. So maybe with the head and the chest then maybe you have the perfect version of Duke. What I do like is the realistic desert uniform and camouflage. This is something that I think was lacking in the 90s and it's nice to have a really realistic, fully realistic military figure that laid in the line and this is a pretty good version of Duke. I can see Duke wearing this uniform on a desert mission. I might have misstated things as well when I said Duke would not be in my top 10 GI Joe characters. He probably would be. He may not rank as high as you might expect. I do not have the file card for Duke version 4 so I'll need to get that before I do a full review on this figure. I'm looking forward to that though. I can already tell that I like it so that will be something to look forward to in the future. Let me know what you think the best vintage version of Duke was. This version is nice. Version 3 is nice. But even version 1 still has a lot going for it. That was just a quick look at Duke version 4 from 1993. I hope you enjoyed it. There is one more review for 90s months that's coming up this weekend. Thanks for watching and I'll see you next time.


They say bakers make the world smell better. It is for this reason that we travelled across town to meet Auntie Grace, a self-taught baker and founder G. Bakery, who was said to prove to us that kek calories don't count. Auntie Grace did not always see herself as a baker. She had an 8-to-5 job that consumed much of her time and at times caused her difficulty in meeting her client's demands. My name is Grace Katoa, but I was told to meet Auntie Grace. Auntie Grace was a keki. She was the founder of G. Bakery. G. Bakery, in the year 2020, in the year 2020 officially, but in the year 2019, I went back to Dogo for family and friends. So, in the year 2020, I was very serious about kik Pull utmost care for me in the money for durante the month ofиковit vitamin 2 cancer. I went to the barber shop in the first place. For that time, I had a full-time job for 8-to-5. I was at that job when I went to the barber shop. As an entrepreneur, having multiple streams of income So when the opportunity arose, she crapped it. Likwangumu sana. At times, ina bidi acha kama ni orders, ina bidi nisi chukue. Juna imagine, ina troka job five, na chneilo a trafiki augu. By the time nimi mefkwa panyumba ni around eight. Eight, mimi ni ibibi ya mutu, ma jukumu. Liki anta begging na malizu almost midnight hapo. Likwangumu, bati asa, kushtragulu na jiyo zi jana alazma tustragulu tusi tegeme salari peki ake. Jiyo zi jiyo out next, especially bidi what happen to meona. Half situations don't last. It's the tough people that do. Seeing the enormous gap in the cake industry, she quit her job to pursue her passion. Asa say, mimi my passion, mimi kwa kuna passion ni a begging sana. So despite the fact mimi kwa kuna job ya eight to five, bati begging do nilko niki feika, mandi yo my main work na fahakufanya. So yiyo januar na feb, niki anza, niliwa na business iku vizuri. Nika decide, by the end of the year, mimi nita, nita resigned, niki kushtragu na my begging. Mambua korona ni ni, after tuli resyum tena, niliwa na business imeshika, aiku ambaya vile. So aiku vizuri, bati dika nisha decide ku resign. So nika resign, niki jua 2021, mambua taku wasawa, na nifanya my full-time job. Auntie Grace can bake all types of cakes and for all occasions. Today she will be preparing for us her signature cake, the chocolate mink cake. Kama ni simple cake za birthday unani paya tu oda a day in advance. But kama za wedding zile, las muo paya ni notice na ma paya ma saana ju isu zkona kazi ning na preparation mob. But birthdays ni, kini paya oda leo, keksha iko ready. Leo, to start bake chocolate mink cake, ju ike na zase mani my signature cake. Watu wengi sana oda chocolate mink cake from me. That's why ni ma muo a leo to bake chocolate mink cake. Kukundotu na anza. Izin do ingredients za tu za leo, alafu pale ni kwa decorations. So ingredients za tu za leo, kwa ii recipe na tumia, kwa sababu recipes ni tofa uti. Tu tatumia 2 eggs, half a cup oil, 1 cup milk, 1 cup omota, 150 grams sugar, 50 grams cocoa, half a spoon peppermint essence, 300 grams flour. He's on do za tatumia kwa leo, kwa ii cake. Ni baking tinia 1 kg, ni 8 inch, na prefaku tumia meili kwa avoid kukata cake, ni kei baka cream, una line your tin uti grease, na margarine, uti line na parchment paper. Ndi o keki ako isi shiki, una po, una po either. He explains you could not see only her attention to detail, but also her mastery of the art of baking. Advantajia kutumia kuking oil kwa chocolate cake, ina sa idea ii na kwa models vizuri.  Measurement kwa cake ni muimu sana, ze moment utafel ku measure your ingredients, kek ina weza kuku kosa kuiwa nani, kuna weza labda upato mepetisha unga, unga labda ni nyingi, kuliko ze wet ingredients, ama wet ingredients ni mob kuliko, unga kek ina kosa kuiwa vizuri, na piya texture, piya ita kwa sana, so apa na add peppermint essence, half a spoon, na kwa tanganya vizuri, after apo, na add to the dry ingredients, isi lazimo tumia hand mix, but kama kuna hand mix ina, za tumia ama stand mix but siyo lazima, tanganya umekshua akuna any lamp umekshua meti nga nika suka beza, soe na kizote, kek mix siya piya upato bauti, kia una iiko lights, lakini mix siya zengine, kama vanilla cake utapata iiko a bit thick, kia as heavy. Asa sana tek the difference kwa your lights na thick? Apa na, kwa iiva iikue light, kue thick, kwa putesem, kitu ita mata ni temperature. So na heat in different temperature? Na piya kama nili bautangulia kusema, oven ni akundo ita dita main temperature, wasababukuna ovens tofouti, na temperature piya ni tofouti tofouti, So sa heat uta eka kwa our tins ready for baking. Ita eka kwa tins bili, na prefaku bake kwa tins bili, inaku seviyatu mamuningizaku katakata nini, na kekita kwa tu even vizure. Degres pre-heats her oven at 180 degrees for 10 minutes. Ucha gonga gonga mix siya upo, kutua hewa, bubbles, doi skuna tuba bubbles gisha iwa. Sa ii, ika ready kwa na kwa oven. Our baking time ni 40 minutes at 180 degrees. So kekia kwa keneli aku bake una kuja una clean yon boli kwa una tumia, na zeka kwa ukidi tia rika for decorations. Aiku diki wa even. Ii uta nunguwa from the bakery shops, sarasana ama kwa supermarket. Inaka kama maziwa, lakini sii mazwayutu ya kawa ida yamu pika chai. Inaka even wipi krema.  Uta beat, 예쁘ki. Desheni, utu Traina ka kawi kwa�u kwa kekika ona liya kno teria ke zidu kwa witnessed ii première keki na poyeones A bamboo나 da Dapchoklet, kompontchoklet Una katakata in 2 pises, amonek kwaiz Then unna melt Iyo is the same dapchoklet Uda ni metu miha putengesa easy mahi Small chocolate bars For my decorations Nda ni metu miha chocolate molds Isi na kaivi This is the dapchompontchoklet Geni ni remels Kwa achieves all this And this is my chocolate mold Geni ni metu miha Chocolate ki melts Una ekapo Una ekapo Una fresa for like 5 minuts Then utapata your mini chocolate bars Then utatumiha for decorations Nakuna Chocolate boots Different types Different designs Kikitakaza letas So metu miha true Time flies very fast And before we know it 40 minuts are over It's now time to check if the cake is evenly baked And set down for final decorations She first applies the whipped cream We chat about some of the challenges that she's encountered In this line of business And how she's been able to mitigate them Challenges ni nasasema na piti ya Ni Sometimes Steam as na puteya Na ubona kekapo unna Una bep But it's at least to easy piya Una advance kiasi Kama mimi steam ekini puteya Ni kuna my friend Who is also my neighbor Ako na gas oven Uwa na mumba na bake apo Na piya Kama ni odasi odakuwa Kuna naza method Jumiya maretati Na kekila iwa visuri sana Challenging ni na Ni kupata ya vitu za baking Za pastry Semu na ishi Sira isi kwa kuna pastry shots ni ingi Ina bidi eiza ni endetao Nero bitao nuko cbd Ama ni arrestao ni senta ni tikuwa pa But ya ka aw Sometimes ya wana vitu zote Then uses the preheat chocolate To make nice markings on the edges of the cake The cake design is now more visible You can see the beauty of it As the craft man's shape is on point She prepares to serve the cake for her tastes Tosa, e kekim toki tagapata Beni ikotu imo ego Ni hau machi ni Keki ni tumeni geza leo Ni 1,600 only Laki ni kila keki Kila flavor ya keki kuna beiake Kulingana na design ni klante na taka Kijizu ni na taka But sana sana prezizangu zna range from 1,600 Kwendelia Na piya Bei ni za kongia, tunneza kongia Tukai lewa na visuri Ko hii umutu asi kosa kupiga Asi muna bidi siya keki yaki At first glance the cake is well done And when tasted it was very delicious Was going for the third helping when it dawned on me That truly cake calories don't count Setting up a business in this age Requires a good social media presence She shares her social media handles Jibekari mimi na patikana puwam tandao Neza ni pata Instagram At Jibekari 2020 Uneza ni pata piya Facebook Jibekari Uneza ni pata kwa na Bangu ya Simu Which is<PHONE_NUMBER> Or<PHONE_NUMBER> Piya ni kukatita maineo ya Zambezi kikuyu Kikuaizi area Uneza ni pata puwaraizi sana Uneza ni pata puwaraizi sana Uneza ni kikuyu Uneza ni pata puwaraizi sana Na delivery na fanya Olova


On Thursday, Matt Hancock gave evidence to the Health and Science Joint Select Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic. The session was highly anticipated because it followed two weeks on from Dominic Cummings levelling extraordinary allegations at Hancock. Now the Health Secretary was helped by this opening statement from Committee Chair Greg Clarke. Now we took all evidence from the Prime Minister's former advisor Dominic Cummings on the 26th of May. Mr Cummings agreed at the hearing to provide written evidence to substantiate various verbal claims that were made at that hearing. Mr Cummings was asked to provide this evidence to the committee by Friday the 4th of June in good time to inform our questions today to the Secretary of State. We have not received that evidence nor any explanation as to why that has not been available. Now as Jeremy Hunt and I both said in our last hearing, it's important that if serious allegations are made against an individual, they should be corroborated with evidence and it must be counted as unproven without it. Now that opening statement essentially meant the session was a little bit less dramatic than many of us had been expecting because it was basically giving Matt Hancock a bit of a get-out saying yes Dominic Cummings may have levelled all of these claims at you but we're not going to push too hard on them because he didn't back them up. To my mind though there were still lots and lots of interesting statements made by Matt Hancock in his testimony minutes over four hours long and much of it was not very convincing. So these comments on the government's failure to pay people to self-isolate was probably what was most telling. The very specific thing we're trying to understand because this is a lesson to learn exercises is why in that middle period of last year we weren't successful in preventing the second and third lockdowns and when Baroness Harding gave that evidence in February we were in the middle of our third lockdown. Now just on that point of financial support some people say that one of the reasons people didn't isolate is because we didn't just give a simple promise that if you isolate because you're asked to by Test and Trace we will make up as the state any salary loss that you have. Would that have helped? Well the challenge that we had with that proposal is the extent to which it might be gained because after all a contact gives Test and Trace their contacts that is what contact tracing is made of and so you wouldn't want a situation in which you if you tested positive you could then list your entire friendship network who all get a £500 payment. An extraordinary explanation from Matt Hancock. So he's saying there was this policy which maybe could have worked to limit the spread of Covid-19 but we couldn't we couldn't adopt it because it could be abused and some people could use their friendship networks to get money. Where was a policy area where people were able to use their friendship networks to get lots of money? Basically every other aspect of policy when it came to Covid-19 so when it came to PPE what we saw is people who were in friendship networks with the Conservatives were able to charge charge way above the odds for PPE which often didn't work. Matt Hancock didn't say oh well we won't be able to do this because some people in friendship networks might be able to abuse the system and get money. He said no I'm going to do that and by the way when you point out that people in my friendship networks abuse the system to get money I'm going to say yes well even if that risk was there this was so important because this pandemic was deadly and we saved lives by doing it for some reason that logic doesn't apply when it comes to this hypothetical that some people might have claimed £500 by gaining the system. Obviously the difference here is they wouldn't have been in the friendship network of Matt Hancock they would have been you know probably working class people in the country for whom £500 means a little bit more than it does to Matt Hancock and his friends. Now you might say look I've misunderstood he wasn't saying the problem was that people would unjustly claim money and it would be a waste of money and we'd be rewarding cheats. You could say no his worry was that what would happen is that people would get Covid-19 on purpose and so the policy could backfire instead of reducing the transmission of Covid-19 these payments could actually increase it. Now for this one I'm not going to give my own argument I'm going to go to a behavioral scientist on this and one of the advisors to Sage it's Stephen Riker he sits on the spy B group so that's the body which gives behavioral advice or behavioral science advice to Sage. Now Riker replied the following under the clip we've just shown you so he says it was Tory anti-welfareism which determined the decision the old discredited notion that the problem is benefit cheats when a far greater problem is lack of benefits and of benefit take up it reflects an elitist mistrust of the masses the same ideology which led the government to delay lockdown because of a supposed behavioral fatigue and to delay testing and masks on the ground that people wouldn't wear it. They were wrong on every count and we paid for it in lives and economic devastation it shows that the failures of this government aren't coincidental that it isn't a matter of a few incompetent individuals or baddens or of narrow-minded groups it is dialed deep into their ideology it is expressed in so many interlic ways and it comes down to the fact that they see the public as a problem when the evidence shows that collective solidarity is the best asset in a crisis I think that last sentence is what's so important there Steven Riker is someone who has studied how the public behave in pandemics and he said actually what the government should do is draw on people's collective solidarity that is the best way to contain diseases it's not to assume that everyone is incredibly cynical and is going to try and gain the system even if that's what Matt Hancock's friends do it's not what the general public are going to do that's according to behavioral scientists who have studied pandemics in lots of different environments but instead we have a government who assumes the worst about the general public and assumes the best about their own friends or at least accepts the worst from their own friends and what we have is a situation where 40 percent of people who are contacted didn't self-isolate because of this this quack idea that if you introduced some kind of benefit to make life more livable for ordinary people they would go out lamppost to get COVID-19 on purpose Aaron we've been complaining for months that the government hasn't paid people to self-isolate this is such an obvious gap in their pandemic response and it's almost inexplicable while they haven't why they haven't introduced it what did you make of that explanation from Matt Hancock it's quite a vanilla sort of neoliberal argument you know we saw this repeatedly actually towards the beginning of this crisis and this is where you saw cracks in the kind of neoliberal economic orthodoxy because there's very same people who said well austerity would be a really good idea 2009-10 the the exact same people some of the exact same economists were saying well look we can't pay people not to work because it doesn't create the right incentives that'd be a terrible thing actually for the economy and clearly that is the stupidest thing you know aka by the way we don't want to disidentify as work no that's absolutely what we want to do we want to we want to have a demobilization of the economy to get on top of a pandemic right the public health argument was you want to definitely not have people having the incentives to work absolutely that's absolutely correct we basically lost as a as a country as a society we've basically lost 13 years because today I mean we're we're still using losing years but in terms of life expectancy in terms of child poverty in terms of access to buying a home you know in terms of being above the sort of the poverty threshold 60 percent of the average wage we've basically lost 13 years debt's going up because of these idiots and I think we should be grateful that actually people are beginning to realize it's not entirely all it's cracked up to be and actually they shouldn't be listened to and actually yes when you hear them and you say well that doesn't sound like common sense you're entirely right it isn't common sense you shouldn't listen to them a lot of them are idiots and ideologues and zealots and fanatics and I think Hancock summed up pretty well I actually want to go to to something else from Stephen Reich which relates to to what you're saying because I mean essentially you're saying you know all of these people who say our theories are how the world works they've been outed as essentially like quacks people people who are sort of making it up on the on the back of an envelope it's not tested in real life over and over again it's proven to be wrong and Stephen Reicha who as I've introduced he sat on spy b he was one of the behavioral scientists who was advising sage is saying these quacks were portrayed by the government as the science and that was used to justify their own terrible mistake so I want to go to another thread from him that he put out on on Thursday after that testimony from from Matt Hancock so here he's screenshot it an article from Sky COVID-19 Matt Hancock says an earlier lockdown would have gone against scientific advice and in particular in the testimony he gave he was asking why didn't you lock down earlier he said well because all the behavioral scientists were telling me that we'd that the public would get behavioral fatigue and therefore who was I to override them now Stephen Reicha responds to this I well recall the moment we first heard the argument that lockdown had to be delayed because people wouldn't abide it for long we had no idea where the idea came from and we were horrified first and foremost because we felt it was wrong and would do great damage he goes on I had joined the government advisory structures because of previous work I had done with professor John Drury on behavior in emergencies where the consensus debunks the notion of panic and shows how people act in far more orderly reasoned and supportive ways than usually assumed this notion was a return to the old folk psychology myths about the frailty of mass behavior it was the triumph of myth over evidence it went against the general scientific consensus it certainly went against what we were advising the government we were horrified also because if this idea gained traction it would discredit behavioral science and suggest it was part of the problem not the solution we felt that it would be used subsequently to blame the scientists for the government's failures now over a year later we realized that we were more accurate than we feared Hancock argues he was stopped by the scientists from acting quickly against covid this is an inversion of the truth if this were a proper inquiry Hancock would be guilty of perjury we talked at the time about you know back in March back in March 2020 about how this this concept of behavioral fatigue seemed to be absolute nonsense I remember showing images of the the Italian military driving through a town with bodies on the back of their their trucks the usual undertakers couldn't handle the number of deaths and we had in Britain people say oh no people will get behavioral fatigue seriously you've got all of these bodies piling up the hospitals are overwhelmed and you think people are going to be like no we demand going outside and going to the pub the government was saying the behavioral scientists say this now we're hearing the behavioral scientists saying we were not saying that two possibilities here Matt Hancock is a pathological liar or there were some behavioral scientists e.g the people in the nudge unit the neoliberal nudge unit who were telling them these quack theories and they only listened to the scientists they wanted to believe this has been going on for a couple of hundred years like seriously people have been dying at the hands of British government in the name of science and I'm not saying this lightly if you look at the famines that were inflicted on the Indian subcontinent by successive British governments you know about 35 million people die in India British India under British rule between the 1760s 1948 30 35 million huge numbers now you think well famines happen okay well hold on a second when a gentleman called Richard Temple to Richard Temple tried to get grain to sort out the Arissa famine do you know what the economist said Michael I think it was in 1866 they said it's not the job of government to stop people dying the economist magazine right because what he was doing was interfering in the full functioning of the free market lasso fairy economics the exact same story in Ireland in the 1840s 1850s millions of people died in famines because the science was you shouldn't interfere that that's the economic orthodoxy you shouldn't do that actually this is the right thing to do so we're in a really old story here Michael of British elites white powerful wealthy men allowing people to suffer purely for greed purely because of of commercial business interests and dressing up as scientific this is not new right okay this isn't the Bengal famine in 1943 it's not the Arissa famine it's not the Bengal famine of the 18th century but the fundamental basis is the same so you know screw the working class we're going to look out for the elite we're going to put the economy first but we're going to dress up with these pseudo scientific theories some things don't change


hmm man shop we need to have the shop we need to have the power to manage the Buy ok What is this one thing here? My wife left me again! Who is the one here? We have to do this. We can't even put the top down, right? You don't have to do it. We need to ask them. What can we do? We need to do it at home. Do it, because we don't have any money. Don't do it. We don't have any money, but we'll do it. It's not a problem. You'll have to work, right? I'm not going to work, I'm going to do it. I'm going to do it. I don't want to do it. Mm, here I'm down at the border. Look at the way it's going. How many? What's the other.... Go ahead. What's the other one? That's the one, but I think I need to start.


A data set is a collection of data elements grouped together for data entry. In this video, we will describe data sets in more detail, so you can see what types of data sets can be created in DHS2 and their configurable options. You can think of data sets as a way to bundle and organize data elements for the purpose of data entry. Data sets have a defined period related to the frequency of reporting of the data elements they contain and are linked to organization units, a location or set of locations where the data values for the data elements in the data set are collected. The data entry app is used to collect data values for these data elements that correspond to the data sets that you configure through the maintenance application. With this in mind, data elements, periods and organization units are key parameters that need to be considered when creating data sets. Let's take a look at the RMN-CAH aggregate data entry form as an example of how data set configuration options are displayed in the data entry app. Notice the three main dimensions in the green box above the data entry form. The organization unit, data set and period. The configuration of your data set will determine which organization units and periods can be selected here. As we scroll through the form, we can see it has several sections. One for anti-natal care, one for delivery and one for family planning. This is an example of a section form where the specific sections in the form are configured through the data set and the maintenance app. Section forms are one of three options for configuring a data entry form in DHS-2. The others being the default data entry form and the custom form. When deciding which form to use, you should consider both how data will be entered and what the capacity to manage a form over time is within your organization. Section forms are simple to manage while also allowing you to control the layout of your form. They are more easily translated and are fully compatible with the DHS-2 Android Capture app. They should be used whenever possible. Custom forms require specific knowledge to maintain, modify and translate and will not work with the DHS-2 Android Capture app. They should be used only when required. In summary, a data set is a collection of data elements grouped together for data collection. Data sets are created and edited in DHS-2 using the maintenance app and are displayed as data collection forms in the data entry app. There are three different types of data sets that can be configured. Default forms are the simplest form type. Section forms can be used to define various sections in a data entry form and data elements can be arranged in a specific order. Finally, custom forms allow a fully flexible design but require the use of additional web technologies to design and maintain.