ropped all 3DS was all right. I don't really... I'm just really curious. Yeah, like, you can transfer... You can play DS. Exactly. It was backwards compatible though. You could play DS games. I know, I understand that. I just... It seems like a weird argument because it feels like you're saying if I want to play an old game while I sold the systems, so now I can't play it. Well, yeah, but you know... Unless it's backwards compatible, then you could... If it wasn't backwards compatible, you'd know that you're giving up being able to play that game. Let me try to connect things. Let us changeably touch our tips. I was just saying that. I'm just saying that. By the way, I think there's going to be backwards compatibility. I want to make that very clear. This is the devil's advocate take of hello, are so many Pokemon games on 3D... Look at the fire. Obviously. You can't play any of those on Switch. So what are we talking about? So, correct me if I'm wrong. I just want to try and connect that the points are being made here. I believe ultimately, the point that Jake is making is that a lot of Pokemon fans want to have access to all their Pokemon. And if you don't have the backwards compatibility, and you want to buy Switch 2, if you sell your Switch to do that, don't sell your Switch. But then the thing is, a lot of people will want to sell their Switch to get a Switch 2. So they kind of do that. But the value of your Switch is going to tank anyways. Yeah. I mean, what are you going to do? Get 80 bucks? Well, but I mean, the point is it... Andre, that's exactly what I'm saying. You're getting at exactly what I'm saying. The point is though, is that less people would buy Switch 2 then. How would the less people buy it? Well, hold on. Just hold on a second. Let me talk about it. The point to be made here isn't that this would be the sole reason why it should happen. But it's another drop in the bucket as to why it makes more sense that it's backwards compatible. But why wasn't this a problem going from 3DS to Switch then? Because people kept their 3DS because it was a handheld well-to-home console. Well, actually, what it actually was a problem. National Dex... A Switch 2 is an actual replacement for the Switch. A lot of people... A Switch 2 is an actual replacement for 3DS. A 3DS was a totally different thing with its own... It was a hand. They're both... Are they not both handhelds?  You... Listen. It happens.  Yeah, it's a hybrid. It's both a replacement for 3DS and Wii U. But the thing is they have their own ecosystem of games. The Switch 2 is in the same ecosystem of games. What are we talking about? Well, hold on a second though. So, the thing is... I don't get it. It makes no sense. No, it's not. Like, that's like playing with PS4 and PS4 of different ecosystems. No, they don't. That's Sony's problem. They made it not have a different ecosystem. That's not enough. Nintendo systems. There were several handhelds in a row where Pokemon just were able to transfer over. They had to do... They... Yes, they were... They had no choice but to do a hard switch over. There was no choice. But to then do it again just one generation afterwards, when before was several generations... You know, it's not a desirable outcome. It's not the sole reason why there should be backwards compatibility, but it's just another additional consideration. Yeah, and again, I do think there will be backwards compatibility. I've been very... Nintendo's got a long history of one generation of backwards compatibility and they're still going to have cartridges from what we're hearing. So, like, yeah, I feel like this is going to be backwards compatible. Eric, Eric, Eric, Eric, Eric, Eric. You agree with me and Andres, right? He's been very loud about this in time and time. Completely deafening. Yeah. I honestly don't know. Yeah, I'm just not... You're good. I mean, literally, there's easy solutions too. Like, oh, you want to play the old game because you want to ask the old Pokemon. Well, you can put all the Pokemon on Pokemon at home and then you remaster the old games. But you already... You just did that. Why would you remaster Diamond and Pearl when you just did it and you did a bad job? Because you did a bad job. So... No, but there's the next generation to remaster. They always have to have another one. Let them get a bad job. So that's why you do it. But they do a bad job with all their games. So it's not like it's just... They're going to remaster the old games. You just play the old games. If they have to do one a year, it always has to be a new one. That's what I'm saying. That's almost... We're on record at the moment. Jake just said they're all a bad job. So we're talking about a franchise that every game is bad. Got it. That still sells a lot. The remakes are always a bad job. Yes. But they need to do a different one every time. And you know this. This isn't even a debate. I know. I'm saying, dude, I'm saying we're entering the realm of remasters and remakes. So why can't they just remaster the old games and bring them back? Listen. Why can't they? They can do whatever they want. But if we're just talking about remasters... They just remade in 2019. What makes more sense? They're going to go with Gen 5 or Gen 2. They could remaster Sword and Shield. I don't know. It's the Pokemon Company. I would never... That's all hook. That's all hook. What makes more sense though, right? What makes more sense? Pokemon companies still being on operate on the typical ecosystem they tend to do, or they're going to start to do a whole bunch of different things. Because what you're suggesting is they completely change their strategies. Broccoli remasters of the game six months later. We're going to bring it off the switch. How is this a change? They just did it. They just did it. We just went 3DS hard switch to switch. I'm so confused because 3DS were handheld only games. They weren't hybrid. They weren't console games. Dude, they still haven't made a console Pokemon game. What are we talking about? I disagree. That's a different argument. I'm just... It's a different argument. It's not relevant. Him mentioning that, oh, it's different because Switch is a home country. Dude, it's a handheld. It uses literally all the technology with the screen. Does it have a screen? Does every switch come with it? There's no switch that doesn't switch. It's literally...  It comes FaceTime me and we're going to work this out.  No. Actually, yes, there is a switch. What do you think it is? I agree there's going to be backwards compatibility, but also if there isn't, I don't think Pokemon is going to be anything anyone's concerned about. Some Pokemon fans might be sad and the argument is just don't get rid of your damn switch. So this is why the Pokemon thing makes sense. Just because Pokemon is a big, big money maker for Nintendo and having Pokemon available, one on the Switch one obviously because that's what Pokemon company wants, but also available for Switch two because it does help it. If Pokemon is not playable on Switch two for the holidays, that is a problem. Is it a problem that they can get over for sure? But it's not a good thing. Right? The same way backwards compatibility.  I'm not going down that slippery slope to be clear. We're just talking about one Pokemon game, right? Right? Like what do you mean? Right? Wait, what? It's no, it's not necessarily just one Pokemon game. It's however many Pokemon games come out until the rain move on to the next console. Okay. And why aren't they ready to move on to the next console? What's the reason? Obviously the answer is because they want, well, there's actually more than one reason, one reason that I think that's the reason that you're steering me towards is because they're waiting for more, the install base. But the second reason is because development cycles, they need to be ready to put out that next game. I mean, I don't want to, look, I'll say this about your second reason. I'll never buy the second reason because if that means that Game Freak would not have had access to Switch before anybody else switched. Okay, here's my last argument.  For those, there's a lot of people that like Pokemon is their main game. They play it the only way it would make sense for it to not be backwards compatible is if there was a brand new Pokemon day one launch title of full-blown Pokemon. Otherwise they're telling all the people that play Pokemon. Yeah, you can transfer your Pokemon Pokemon home and just not play Pokemon for the next year until a new Pokemon. A majority of people that play Pokemon aren't going to have a Switch during that time anyways. That's like the whole reason they don't, they don't bring over that early in the gen. Pokemon fans wouldn't ever want to do that. They're not going to have Switch, too. But the thing is usually, right, when a new system comes out, there's going to be enough of them in the market for the matter at that point. Listen, I've been usually an early adopter for handheld Nintendo systems and I've also been a big Pokemon fan. I think Jake isn't the same, but it is me. No. We tend to play our, that we tend to play the Pokemon, even though they were made for the prior system, we play those games on the new system. There is still an audience for that and it does hurt you. It's not, again, it's not the only point, but it does hurt you. You don't, if you don't have backwards compatibility, you are losing out on some sales. That's a fact. Now, obviously, that's not the only reason why they should do it. Because it makes a presumption that people that own Switch, too, if they really wanted to play Pokemon wouldn't have held onto their Switch to play it. It's an assumption being made. I'm, my presumption is if they release it there and then they wait and then they re-release it on Switch, too, again, they get a double bump in sales twice. It might actually be tomorrow. I'll just say this. If they want an extra 30 million people buying their system, they'll let them play their Pokemon games backwards compatible. If they want those 30 million people to wait till the next Pokemon game comes out and they don't want to sell 30 million extra units at launch, then, yeah, they won't have to sell 30 million extra units at launch. It's only going to be like, how many Switch twos do you guys think are going to be sold through the holiday next year? Like, how many realistically do you think Switch two customers will exist? More than you think. If it drops in March, maybe 30 million top. But I don't mean like, I mean like, as they are available. Oh, whoa. That would be an all-time record. So, if they could sell 15 million in its first fiscal year? Yeah, it was about 15 million. I think they're intending for a, I think Nintendo's aiming for a similar number, if not more. Okay, but it's not probably releasing in March of next year. So, there's going to be less than 15 million. No, but they're going to get the majority of those out by the end of the holiday. Depends on what it launches. You know, like, it's September, I think realistically, you might only have like 6 million people with one. And I'm not going to be a Debbie Downer. It's just like, it's only a few months of sales. It's going to be sold out. It's going to be hard to get. Other platforms are dropping as well. So, the consumers are going to be trying to buy, you know, the new Xboxes, the new Play Stations. Other games are coming out for the little system because they should be in their heyday. They should start getting slapped in with games. So, now Nintendo's competing in that market. And then on top of that, hey, we are fighting that manufacturing to get as many of these things made. We've heard from the ports that Nintendo's trying to get out a lot. Sure. And the reports were that they would start mass manufacturing by the end of the year. So, the reason why Nintendo wouldn't release a system earlier is because of trying to get enough units so they can have a massive launch. They're not trying to have a small launch. They want to have a big launch. Obviously, that's a relative term, small thing. We don't know what that actually equates to for an actual number. Right? So, we can argue this all day. We don't have the answer. We don't. We don't. But anyways, beyond the Pokemon point, right? Like, I mean, even in your video today, right? You mentioned how there is another source that indicated that they've heard about backwards compatibility. And, but there weren't, there were some uncertainty. And I think what's interesting about that is goes back to like the initial report we got about backwards compatibility like a month or so ago. If you're getting multiple, if you're hearing from multiple developers and some are saying backwards compatibility and some are saying not, my interpretation of that is that some people don't have access to backwards compatibility yet. But the fact that it exists suggests that they can totally do it. It would be Nintendo making some sort of decision to not do it. And the problem with that is that as we've discussed before, getting backwards compatibility on the system is not an easy thing to do. So, they would have to actually most likely have to have done some sort of R&D to get backwards compatibility working. I mean, there are some developers that have dev kits to have backwards compatibility. That means they already put the investment into doing it. So, wouldn't it be weird for them to not do it when they already put the investment into it? At least we can all agree on one thing. If they do have backwards compatible compatibility, the only reason why is because of Pokemon and Nate was wrong. Let's, so if they have backwards compatibility, when it comes out, it's okay, Nate, you don't have to say anything. We all know that's the reason. Too bad. I'm going to address the name of this. No, so I'm just probably like, you were saying what third parties had to, for there to be this confusion, some third parties are put in time to port or like make it back. Like, what did you just say about third parties? I don't think you understood my point. Yes, that's why I'm trying to get you to re-clarify, but Jake, you're up to me. Yeah, let me try and explain my point better. So, the point I was making is that we've heard from different developers that there is backwards compatibility. We've heard from other developers that there isn't backwards compatibility. So, the implication would be that there are different dev kits out there that offer different features. Sure. Okay, so we're on the same page now, but what we also understand is that getting backwards compatibility to work is not just the flick of a switch. It requires some R&D and to come up with a solution. For Nintendo, yeah. Correct, right. So, if some of the Nintendo Switch 2's dev kits have backwards compatibility, that would imply they already went through the research and development to get that working. So, why would they make that investment to not actually have it in the system? I would say that would be... I'm not saying it's impossible that they would forgo it, but it would be them accepting a loss. And again, we all agreed that there's going to be backwards compatibility, even when playing devils... The point is, though, is that when you consider what I just illustrated, hopefully well, that it just makes it unlikely that there won't be backwards compatibility or rather likely that there will be... The devils' advocate responses, these are all unverified reports. Sure, nothing's confirmed, but if we're going to bet money, I'm betting my money on backwards compatibility. I actually... It's confirmed... I talked to the Pokemon company and they confirmed that they fought for... Well, I mean, I have an unpopular opinion about Pokemon anyways. Let's go, let's go. They completely made a mistake when they even put in transferring your Pokemon. They should have all just been self-contained games. Oh, you... Oh, this doesn't make any sense. He just went to... By the way, I would actually... I agree with them. I'd prefer Pokemon if it was that way, but it's not. And because it's never been that way... Oh, I know, I know. Pokemon fans are going to... Oh, I know they are. They're going to burn me down. They're going to stick you in that fire pit. Oh, I know. I want Pokemon to be that way, but it's not going to be that way. I thought they made a mistake when they did that to begin with, but... Yeah, so did I, but... I mean, there's a reason why they had to throw it. Got to catch them all. Yeah, you can't go back now, though. Too late to do it. They never... For those that aren't wondering... Let me ask you a clarifying question on that, Eric. Do you mean like, you wish every standalone Pokemon game had access to every Pokemon within it? No. No, just its own Pokemon. Yeah, self-contained games. And you see, you're sitting there going like this because Pokemon's never been that way, but Zelda's that way. Mario's that way. So many video games are self-contained. So it's like, you could have self-contained in that each generation about those... I'm gonna self-contain all over your face. I'm sorry, I was beaten over the head with Got to Catch Them All. So... You hear 1,100 Pokemon, you're like... You don't have to catch them all. You can play them as self-contained games if you wish. Having an extra option isn't a bad thing.  They only said that in Gen 1, then they removed the slogan. I would be careful with that. What Gen 2 is when they stop saying that, I think. What Gen sold the most again? Which one had the biggest, largest fan base? I don't know which one sold the most, but... They stopped using Got to Catch Them All as a slogan after Gen 2. So they stopped it in the anime as well? The anime is not a big deal. Like the game song? They were related. I know they were separate stories, but it was the whole... They got to catch them all phrase. It wasn't just like a one-off. Oh, it appeared in a game one day and then vanished the next day. It was taken out of the box art for Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire. Okay. Between January, it dropped sometime between January, 2003 and March, 2003. Okay. 20 years ago. And I'm 37. When did the original Pokemon come out? What does that matter to you? Most Pokemon players aren't. We're talking about from the very beginning of the series that we would have preferred it this way. We're not talking about just having the camera. That was when there was like 300 Pokemon max. Once they started adding more than that, they dropped that. And then they had the Gen 2. Gen 2 could have been self-contained. But I know it sounds crazy today because Pokemon's never been that way. That's why when he brought it up, I was like, oh, I can't believe he went there. But I agree that I wish Pokemon... You made me mad, Eric. I thought we were friends. Sorry. I know. I love you still. But... Well, so the self-contained Pokemon thing, I mean, the appeal of it is, it forces you to let go of those prior Pokemon and focus on what's just in this game. Not just that. It's... Some of it is just the overwhelming amount of sheer Pokemon that it's like... If I wanted to catch... Optional, you do... You can catch six Pokemon and beat any Pokemon game. But if I wanted to... But most people don't play Pokemon... Well, like, I shouldn't say most people. I will say that for us growing up, the point of Pokemon is to catch them all. And that's still true to me. That's not true. Most people never caught them all in Gen 1. They just beat the Elite Four. It's also a relative term. Catch them all in the game. You got to remember... But yes, you're right. Catch them all in the game. That's why every... That's why every game that comes out only has 400.  That's why every game is like that now. So they are self-contained if you want them to be. And you can still get it like... Oaks... All right, I have it. I have a... I have like today's games, though, where like they don't have the giant National Dex anymore. But let's be real here. How many people actually catch them all? That is a strong... Okay. No, you haven't. When was the last thing you caught them all? Pokemon Legends Arceus. Oh, okay. Nice. I thought you didn't play Pokemon games. That's a good Pokemon game. I'm sorry that they don't make them very often. My bad. Hopefully we get another one next year. I love that. I love that empty tech demo. Because as much as the pack is compatible, people will play on the Switch too. And Legends Arceus is the highest rate of Pokemon game since... Gosh. What's it been, 20 years? Empty tech demo seems to be better than every other Pokemon game according to the critics. All right, so moving on. Sorry, I just had to throw that out there. Jawbreaker! I had to throw that out there. $5 says not having backwards compatibility would be insane to Switch as a massive library in Snowbase. Why the hell would they want it to start over? And I agree. To be clear, I was playing Devil's Advocate. I think we're going to get backwards compatibility and internalize the history of it. It makes a lot of... You heard it all. You heard it here. He was playing Devil's Advocate. He knows that Pokemon would never let it not be backwards compatible. He doesn't believe that over anything Nintendo does to be clear. There's no say. Pokemon doesn't have that kind of... Yeah, hold on, hold on. Nintendo would never do anything because of Pokemon Company, that's true. Let me argue against that point Nate just made. All right, let me ask you this question. What's more important to Nintendo? Capcom or Pokemon? Probably Pokemon. They own the IP. All right, so and then... All right, so you agree with that point? Right, so you agree with the RAM thing? Yeah, you know exactly where I'm going. So if Capcom had this way to get Nintendo to put an additional gigabyte of RAM, which was 30% more RAM on the Switch, then... Unverified report. Sure. Okay, but do you think it's likely? I don't know. It could have been more than just Capcom requesting it, and they're just the name they got thrown out there. I know they're the only third-party company that told Nintendo we want more RAM. So do you think they're the only third-party company that told Nintendo we want more RAM? I think they're the only third-party company that told Nintendo we want more RAM. So do you think Capcom influenced it or not? Do you think it was part of the decision? Yeah, what do you think? I don't know. I've never... I've literally never been involved with Nintendo discussing hardware with other companies. So what do you think then? I think that everyone was requesting more RAM. Let's look at the top 10 best-selling games on Switch. Capcom got named because that was the source of the report. Like the guy knew someone at Capcom, so that was like the source for the report. But I don't think they're the only ones that were telling Nintendo we want more RAM. I think... I don't know. I think they're the only four credit. Do you think that them being one of them, if they were influential? I mean, in the Pokemon... Do you think that's the most important thing to consider? Because I believe that original report said source is close to Capcom. And it's like, well, only Nintendo knows if that was the big influence or not. So you're not going to answer a question. Okay. No, I did answer the question. You just didn't like my answer. No, what my question was, even if it was hundreds, do you think Capcom being one of them influenced it at all? Do you think Nintendo took them into consideration if Capcom was one of them? Do you think they took that into consideration? I think they would have been considered without Capcom. So what's the point? So with Capcom, they definitely did then, right? No, I don't think any more than any other company. You're trying to just say, yeah. Not any more than any other company, but they took that... That did... They did that in consideration, right? That's all I'm saying. Okay, I don't know what the point to it is. I'm saying that I don't think they listened to Capcom specifically to make this decision. It was a general... Sure, right. I get what you're saying that. I'm just saying, do you think them being one of the companies added to it? If it was 11 companies without Capcom, do you think Capcom being the 12, hypothetically, would have given them more... No. ...influence? No. No? No. Okay. Yeah. If 11 major third-party companies are like, hey... No, you think that if Capcom said we would like 12 gigabytes of RAM, Nintendo would have just not taken that in consideration at all. 12 gigabytes of RAM? They were never going to do that for Switch 2. Well, Switch 2, I don't think they consulted anyone, but NVIDIA themselves. They're doing the consulting now. That's what all the dev kits and the gamescom stuff is, and no one's complaining. So I don't really know what the problem is. Okay. I was saying that we're talking about something that happened a long time ago, and yeah, trying to bring up this point that Nintendo would listen more to the Pokemon company, or in this case, Game Freak, than other companies. And well, yeah, of course they would, because Nintendo owns Pokemon. They don't own anything Capcom says. Right, so here's a crazy stat for you. Fine. I just don't think the Pokemon company makes those kind of requests. Right. So there have been over a billion software sales for Nintendo Switch. Sure. I'm looking at the site. It's 1,088 million. If you add up the mainline Pokemon games, you get about 94 million, which is a little bit under 10% of the total software sales of Nintendo Switch. Sure. You're going to tell me they don't have Sway? That's Sway. Right, that's a big number. That's Sway? That's a big ratio of your software sales, which by the way, Nintendo is over and over again. I know it happens, yeah. And then, you know, obviously a lot of those software sales come from third parties as well, right, but Pokemon is not third party. I don't know what the cut is, but I'm assuming Nintendo makes more from Pokemon sales than they do from third-party sales, but I don't know that for a fact. Yeah, I don't know what the cuts are, yeah. Yeah. Point is though, Pokemon games take, they're a big ratio of the total software sales for Nintendo. They absolutely have Sway. I just don't think they've ever made hardware requests. I don't think they care. And I think you can see that in the games that they make. I don't think they really care. They just make it for whatever they're given. I don't think they care about hardware requests in terms of like power, capability, anything like that, but stuff that would directly relate to transferring Pokemon and the ability to play games on a different platform. You think Pokemon company that ended the National Dex cares? Absolutely, because they care about money. That's all they care about. You just care about sales. You care about sales, that's it. I actually, exactly. Exactly. So let me tell you this. Everyone thought it would hurt sales when they ended the National Dex and then they went on to release back to back. How many Pokemon home subscriptions? That is bogus. Let me tell you something about Pokemon home. This is the best one I can make. Sure. Pokemon home, if you let your subscription lapse, all of the Pokemon that you have inside there, if you've transferred every Pokemon you have from all of your Switch games to Pokemon home, and you let your subscription lapse, all your Pokemon stay in there for free until you renew your subscription. Yeah. So how many subscriptions do you think would lapse if the Switch 2 came out without a new Pokemon game and people just transferred their Pokemon in? Now, would some people keep playing and keep their original Switch? Of course. But how many subscriptions are losing subscriptions? Why would they lose subscriptions? Because that would be the only way to bring Pokemon from Switch to Switch 2. So why would why? There's no game they can play on Switch 2 unless there's more. But there will be eventually. Why would they cancel that? So why keep paying for it? Until that game comes out, subscriptions would go down. And that is why case closed. I'm confused because maybe you still want to access Pokemon from the prior games before Switch. Then you wouldn't transfer them in the Pokemon home. You're thinking that they never would transfer them in the Pokemon home? Not until the new game came out.  Well, they could sell their own. There's no new Pokemon games to buy new Pokemon games. They can do that. They can do all that now. There's no new Pokemon game coming out for Switch. I love the way he just yanked himself like that. You might be back. I don't know if you'll actually be back. I have no idea. That was a great access. That was a... Anyways, no, I'm saying that people can people, some people sell their Pokemon games to buy new Pokemon games too. But the only way they still have access to Pokemon is if they put them at home and if they want to transfer the new Pokemon games. But there is no new Pokemon game coming out. It's going to be a new Pokemon game probably next year, right? Is that something we can... For Switch 2. For Switch 2. You think it's a Switch 2 exclusive game? Not exclusive. They can just let their subscription lapse and then if they want to do it, they'll re-up their Pokemon. I don't know why they're confused. Why would they want... I'm confused. So you're saying they would let their subscription lapse if a new Pokemon game comes out because it's not on Switch 2? No, no, no. They would let it lapse until that game came out. But won't... Don't they do that already? I mean... Why would they just do that already? If you're done playing the Pokemon game and you transferred your Pokemon, I'm done paying till the next income. I'm confused. That doesn't make any sense. But there would be a lot more people doing it if they were trading in their Switches for a Switch 2. Because not every Pokemon player is a die-hard Pokemon. If a brand new Pokemon game came out, they probably aren't trading in their Switch. What do you... If a brand new game came out that was exclusive to Switch, while Switch 2 was out, why would they... If they're that big of a Pokemon fan, why would they be trading in their Switch? They're just going to play the new Pokemon game. Well, not all Pokemon players are that big of Pokemon fans. Not all Pokemon home subscribers are that big of Pokemon fans. It just makes sense for the Pokemon company to give people that have a subscription to home a reason to keep it. I mean... I have some opinions on home that I don't want to get into. Andres, what's up? Should we move on? Yeah. Well, I have a couple more things I have to share from... I think we just disagree, and I think we're just going to have to move on. There are still a few Pokemon, so it's Trend Tendo, even with the leaked DLC that will not be on Nintendo Switch, like the Elemental Monkeys. Pokemon on Switch 2 will not be any problem, in my opinion. I don't know. Were you backing me up on that one? I'm mentioning that technically... I think he's backing me up, yeah. Yeah, I think he's saying technically they're not all available on Switch, is what he's trying to say. So it's already technically a problem, depending on if the... I mean, it just is a problem, I guess. It's a straight up account of what he's saying. But most of them... To Jake's point, most of them are available. I think it's how many... So on the chat, it was six out of, like, nearly 1,100. Yeah. Well, it could be more than that, too, because I didn't know that. Yeah. So maybe there's other special use cases where maybe there's something that isn't on Switch. I don't have enough knowledge of, like, the Pokemon themselves, like, in any of that to know. I don't have to look into the leaked Pokemon thing. I'm not sure about these elemental monkeys. Yeah, maybe something to come back in the DLC. I'm seeing an article on GameRant that says, this was five days ago, and they might be adding a lot more to the DLC, but it says, as of five days ago, they are 21 Pokemon that you can now... That you can now get on Switch at all. Yeah, but we still have Wave 2. Yeah, we still have Wave 2, so who knows if they get that on Switch. So that might be reduced, but he could be right that there's still going to be a few missing in the next DLC. Well, the other thing is, why does it matter?  Oh, it'll go down to nine. It says an article. There'll be nine missing. Okay. All right. So that was that one. I just wanted to bring that up. And then, I think we did the Jawbreaker one here. So that one's good. We have Joshua David coming in just saying thanks for gifted membership. So yeah, you're welcome, David. You can probably thank Bama Hut. No, I think it was just Bama Hut. I don't know. You don't know if he got it today, though. He might not have been gifted today. Oh, true, true, yeah. We had a... We've had over a hundred gifted memberships this week, so I don't know. Yeah, you're right. It could be from anyone. And then the last actual question, I figured this would be a great one to end the show on. Taker610 says, does Quaker Oats come in the box? I think this is directed at Jake. Does Quaker Oats come in the box? Forever, I'm going to... If this Brooklyn system comes out and it is that cylindrical shape, I think I'm going to call it the Quaker Oats system now. It comes in a tube. It's a canister. There you go. It's a canister. I don't know why I didn't think of this earlier, but it's a canister. But what is the definition of canister? That's where if it says box, I'm going to... It's a cylindrical box. It's a cylindrical box. That would... If it says it's a cylindrical box, then we know that the word for cylindrical box going forward is canister. So if it says that, that just brings it on. It's a cylindrical container. Yes. Okay, it doesn't say box. So there is a difference between the box and the canister. But canister can open up. Technically... Oh yeah, the open up thing can be added. We'll still get a box. Technically, it's not a box or a canister. None of the Xbox or boxes, because you can't open them. Oh, it's what it stores. It's actually... Canister is specifically for storing food, chemicals or rolls of film. Xbox is kind of... Because it does not say that's typically used. It's saying it's literally... That's what makes it a canister. But typically of metal. Yeah, typically made of metal, but it doesn't have to be. Right. But it is used for storing food, as the definition of a tube. I like the name X-Tube. Well, yeah. Sounds like it's nearly familiar. Do not type that in Google. Yeah. A long hollow cylinder of metal, plastic gas for holding, transporting something chiefly liquids or gases. So it's similar to the other one, but it's sort of glass. So it's similar to the canister, but it's meant for carrying something different. Like gases and liquids. Yes. Got it. I'm not guessing. I was like... I was like... Because we use like those breathing tubes, then technically that's oxygen. That's a gas. Okay. So technically, yeah. All right. All right. So there is like a difference. It's like more targeted on what these specifically mean. But they're not boxes. Boxes don't have to have... Boxes don't have to... They don't have to be squares. They don't have to have four corners. Interesting. Well, I want to be at eight corners. So my question is, is quicker oats backwards compatible? Actually, no, that's a very good question. Because right now the Xbox Series X... No, no, the Xbox Series X is backwards compatible all the way back to Gen 1 using disks. You will not be able to do that if your collection is on disks on this new system. That's exactly what I was getting at. Exactly what you're getting at. Exactly. But it technically is for digital libraries. I mean, it's a series and it's still... It's being pinned as it's still a Series X, right? Just a variant of the Series X. Series X. You can play like your digital Xbox One games on Series S. So I guess the problem is what happens when you have a disk. Well, I mean, that's the whole point. It's an all digital system. Maybe they release a peripheral where you can get the disk. You know what they were saying? Wasn't it Sony that they were going to do it all digital but they were going to have a disk accessory or something like that? Wasn't that one of the rumors floating out there for a new system? A disk accessory. But I guess the question is, is a disk accessory used to just prove you have the game so you can download the game? Or is it used so you can run the game from the disk peripheral? I don't know. It's weird. I think it's more just an external disk drives exist. You can buy them through your laptop. It's not like a foreign concept. I would say, yes, that Quaker Oats is backwards compatible because the individually wrapped packages can go back into the canister. There you go. There you go. This is the most important thing to ask. And you do also, with Quaker Oats, you do have cross-platform play because you can mix your cereal whenever you want. Yeah? Yeah. This reminds me of what people ask. The one question in the chat from Entrain is a hotdog and sandwich. The answer is yes. But we don't call it that. It's a taco sandwich. Is it though? It's not two pieces of bread. You don't need two pieces of bread to make a sandwich. What? Oh, we'll cut it in half. You can fold the piece in half. Fold? You can cut it in half. Fold or cut? Wouldn't that be a sub? Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait. One or what? Or would it be a gyro. Item of food consisting of two pieces of bread with meat, cheese, or other filling between them. Ah, so, so every time I literally fold the piece of bread in half with meat in it, I am not eating a sandwich.  You're eating a sub. You're eating a sub. But some funny subs have a top and bottom, like separate pieces. No, it's not really cut in half, like cut into. It's cut. Yeah, it's cut. Oh, maybe it's just called a hoagie. Okay. Oh, no, no. So if you're talking about it, it's a single piece of bread, but they cut it. Well, guess what? Where do you think your slices of bread came from? It was a single piece of bread that you cut. I'm confused. But you cut it into two pieces. Even two pieces. It's cut just partially. That is a difference. Definition of a sub. Hold on. But is a sub a sub of a sandwich? Is this a submarine sandwich? So does that mean that's right? So it's a sub definition of sandwich. Does that make sense? Different different meaning of sub. Yeah. Submarine category of sandwich. Holy. Okay. Okay. So here here we go. This is this is the thing. So a submarine sandwich, the difference is, is that it's actually considered a full loaf of bread that you put the food in versus two individual smaller slices of that loaf. So it's just, it's just, there's a difference. That's just a difference. So it doesn't have to be connected. It just has to be the whole loaf or. So what? It's half loaf, you know. What is it? Is there a distinction if it's connected? Is that like a hoagie? Like. Oh, that's a good question. Would that be considered? Is there a difference? The sub doesn't mean we have to be connected. I get what a sub is now. Yeah. That actually makes sense.  That is, it is like a whole. Is cereal soup? Yes. I should have no idea. Well, no, because doesn't soup require a broth? No. No. The broth. Is it? What makes, what constitutes a broth? Liquid. Oh, no, no, no. Here's the thing. It does not. It is technically not considered on its own to be a soup because cereal is eatable without them. Like it's dry food. It's dry food. Okay. So if I give you a bowl of cereal with milk, would that be soup? No, that's it. It is. Does that qualify? Then it qualify. No, then it does qualify as a liquid food, which is what the soup is called. That's all a soup is, is this liquid food? Just like anything could be considered a salad, but it is soup. Yeah. Soup is very primary. So dry cereal is a salad, but cereal with milk is a soup. I guess technically. Technically, I mean. Well, okay. The thing is, though. Maybe we go on the map. Maybe we go on the map. Maybe we go on the map. Yeah, man. Yeah, man.   This is beautiful. Very pleasure. All right. So there is just as it's just liquid food. I would argue, I would argue, I think it doesn't have to have the pen. Well, there's I'm looking at definitions, right? And I'm seeing the Mary Webster Diction definition is, well, let me click the whole, the whole pursuit. Yes. A liquid food, especially with a meat, fish or vegetable stock as a base and off the containing pieces of solid food. But it's not so right. And that's that's the determining factor. If there was no especially, then you would think it needs to have meat, fish or vegetable stock. But if it seems to be implying that that's what it tends to have. Yeah. I've had fruit soups. I've had cold soups. I've had like watermelon soup from soup factory, but like mango soup. Yeah. So it's basically a liquid food is the only raw definition. And then they just say, but typically it has, but it doesn't have. Right. So technically any food would be soup. So if I put like cereal with water in a blender and blended it, back to a smoothie, a smoothie. It depends how liquidy it is. It's a smoothie. It turns into pure liquid because of all the water I add. How is a smoothie not a soup then? It is. It's a type of soup. It is. This is nuts. No, maybe it's not because they wouldn't have the consistency of a liquid. But no, a smoothie would liquid food. I've had cold soups, like I said, from the soup factory that are fruit soups that could pass for smoothies. Like it's a stream. Well, that's another question. I hate when people do this.  Oh, he's gone. Yeah. I hate when people do that. Hate it. Did the whole stream die? Are we still here? No, no, we're still here. Oh, no, we're still we're still alive. Yeah. It's a cool idea. Oh, oh, something wrong because both of them are gone. It's it's back. Yeah. So we do hate it when people do that. That's on the stream yard. I'm surprised that like the stream kept going. Yeah. Oh, yeah. No, it doesn't. That's one way to end. With a different stream. Yeah, I think you're still gone. Oh, no, he's sort of there. No, he's there taking a moment to come back on your end. We we have the master edition of the stream back here. It's fine. Anyways, well, that I think it's going to do it. We're going to go around the show, go around the show, go around the room, and just tell people what we got going on, where they can find us. I mean, this is the regular crew. So I think most people know what you never know. We do get new people watching every single week. But last week, do we have 4,400 views after the fact? That's that's we haven't had an episode do that forever. How are the two inch boner patrol over there? I guess he's just made it happen. Speaking of boner patrol, where could they find you? But what do you got going on? You guys to find me at Jake Randall. That's my stage name. Boner patrol is my legal name. That's why I go by it on here. But Jake Randall on YouTube or Twitter. There it is. No, Twitter doesn't exist on X. Got it. Got it. On X. No, no. Even when you're on YouTube, I'm not X dot com. Look up Jake Randall on X2. No, I'm not serious. So the X is that it's technically now X videos when you put a video up on there. No, they they they changed the account for that, too. I forget what they changed it to. But they called it now. No, I think they just made it video like. Oh, it's not an X video. And now it's just a video. Yeah. And like it what like Twitter videos that account like the official Twitter video. Just changing the X video just changed the video. So no, no, it's a reference to an adult website. So like. Yeah. I didn't think it through that was that really.   Who cares what anyone else thinks is just, you know, I've always wanted something to be X and have it matter. I bought this thing. It's now X. Have a good day, Eric. We got going on. Where can they find you? I got nothing going on. I'm here. Well, that's lame. I'm here and you can follow me there on so called X. It's not so called. That's the official brand.  I'm not calling it. It's the official brand. I don't care. I'm not calling it. It's called X and we see. We don't tweet. We see. No, you post. That's what they changed it to. It changes from Z. Now that was in their documentation. It was called a Z. Now it's posted. And if you if you look at the retweet button, like if you hover over, it's repost. Yeah, it's repost now. Yes. Yeah. And when you tweet, it's just post. So it's a forum. Yeah. And we decided to take the one thing they have that made them different. That was like something that another company would pay billions for to have their own brand recognition and they just got rid of it. Technically, it's it's a dude on my phone. It's a giant X.  I'm still going to call it Twitter.  I'm just restart. What do you got going on? Where do they find you? You can find me at Andres restart on YouTube. I am in the middle of working on some potential subtle social media changes, just basically putting out my content on other platforms, thinking about it. We'll see. Don't hold me to it. But you may see it full time. Coming up. Finally, you do stuff showing up in other places like Facebook, Tech Talk, Instagram.  Charm, I just feeds got to go somewhere. You didn't say no. Yeah. Oh. Samus in the bikini. Right over the suit. Anyway, yeah. So I make YouTube videos every day about Nintendo news and theories. I'm usually right. That's not true. I'm like, right. I feel good about I feel good about the 50ish percent eventually, like most people. All right. Well, obviously, you guys know who I am. So I'm going to say too much about it. Nintendo Prime, just type Nintendo Prime anywhere it'll pop up. Hopefully, good things pop up. Maybe bad things. I have no idea. I don't really control what your search shows you.  So you let me know what you find. That being said, yeah, you can hear us on all podcast platforms. Well, soon. Technically, the audio version is down at the moment, but we'll be back up soon. So you can look forward to that. Otherwise, thank you. You guys can be back here next week, every week around 8 p.m. I say around because it never seemed to start quite on time. But if you get close someday, so maybe we'll start early one day. No, no. I don't know why I even said that. That's just not going to happen. No. All right, guys, you're awesome. Thank you for supporting the show. And we'll catch you same time next week. Love you guys. Soup, box, cylinders.


私の紹介に感謝します。まず、私はオーガナイザーを感謝します。私はここにお話しすることを願っています。OK。まず、私の話題の紹介です。今日はカルティエトランスフォームのジェネラリズーを説明します。カルティエトランスフォームはシンプソンコレスポンデンスのポジティブキャラクタリスティックアナログを紹介します。オーガナイザーとボロドスキの紹介です。まず、私はオーガナイザーとボロドスキの紹介について説明します。私の話題は、PDノーツのフィクストプライムナンバーです。このスキムはカルティエトランスフォームのフィクストプライムナンバーです。このスキムはPDストラクタリスティックアナログを紹介します。このスキムはゼロIDを紹介します。そして、レッドXゼロIDのスラクタリスティックアナログです。レッドXはSスキムを紹介します。レッドXはSフローバルナンバーです。そして、リアタルフローバルナンバーです。そして、オーギーさんのボロゴドスキー2つの目標を比べます1つ目はOXモジュールE withインテグラブルコネクションナブラEとE-TENSAOXOmega-1XOmega-1X over SI omit to write2つ目はインテグラブルコネクションE-TENSAE-TENSAD-AXD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over SD0X over Sシンメテロッカーアルジブラの 単純とバンドルのX'OPSHIXモジュールはコミュタテブリングOXモジュールのコネクションは コミュタテブリングのコミュタテブリングオーグスボルドスキーを 使用していますアズマイアルジブラストラクチャーC4Dファレンシャルオペレーター オーバーHIXセンター実際 D0 コンテインズDシメトリカアルジブラHIXセンターでPカーバーD0 コンテインズ アズマイアルジブラセンター シメトリカアルジブラランク P2ZRP2RD0 コンテインズ アズマイアルジブラX オーバーSもう一度今 トボロジカルスペース X'だから アズマイアルジブラSシンボル プシャルドこれは無くて アズマイアルジブラX'D0 コンテインズ アズマイアルジブラD0 コンテインズ アズマイアルジブラアルジブラを使って、このオブジェクトを使って、それをモリタイクイバネスに使うことができます。問題は、スプリッティングモジュールをアルジブラに使うことができます。サフィッシェントコンディションを一つのサフィッシェントコンディションをスプリッティングモジュールに使うことができます。では、 let X be the anthropological spaceand let E be the azimile algebra.C4 of the azimile algebra over a commutative ring R on X.Then, assume we find a scalar extension of R.This is the ring and this is the commutative ring.and locally free azimile algebra of rank R to the square.and we find locally free S module of rank Rwith an action of E tensor R S on M.So, we have a map of algebra from S has nothing to do with S.S has nothing to do with S.I have a prime space on R.S has nothing to do with S.Sorry for my abuse of notation.It's okay?Okay, okay.Okay, okay, R prime.Okay, okay.Is that okay?So here, I'm sorry for my bad notation.So, if you also find an action of E tensor R prime on M, say alpha, then alpha must be isomorphism.Alpha is an isomorphism.So, we can conclude M is the splitting module of E tensor R prime.Actually, August Borodowski constructed two splitting modules.I would like to write here.So, this is a general situation.This is general situation.We apply this sufficient condition.In the case, E is the zero and R is the symmetric algebra.First, they constructed splitting module over the completion of...Now, we use Zariski topology, but we will use Etartopology later.First, they constructed splitting module of D0 over the completion of Pd algebra defined by tangent bundle of X prime.Here, the completion is taken by the augmentation ideal.In this case, the splitting module is K dual.This is the OX dual of K, but the definition is complicated.So, I don't explain that.They constructed a splitting module over this algebra under the assumption of an existence of a lifting of X prime to S module P to the square.This is the first splitting module.And the second splitting module is the splitting module over the completion of symmetric algebra.In this case, splitting module is Frobenius pullback over the completion of symmetric algebra.To construct this module, we need an assumption of a lifting of the relative Frobenius module P to the square.No flat lifting.Lifting means...OK.So, what is the M in the first example that...K?What is K?Sorry, the definition of K is complicated.So, I don't explain now.Sorry.What did you write about the K check?K dual.K check?Yes.So, I don't explain the definition of K.So, I'm sorry.So, what did you write about the lifting here?So, you leave it to a lift.Yes.Yes.Yes.No.I explain.Module P to the square is...This means the morphism of the schemes defined over P to the square are such that mod P reduction is nothing but X prime to S.And so, this is the partition.And we also assume X prime tilde and F tilde is flat over Z over P to the square.This is the definition of lifting.In the second case, that is F.So, it means you lift X, you lift X prime.And also, S tilde?Yes, yes, S tilde, definitely.OK.So, it follows that X prime morph to S morph is smooth.Yes.Yes, automatically.So, OK.I would like to give some remarks.Rata assumption is obviously stronger than Formas assumption.As a consequence, the Rata splitting module is smaller than the Formas splitting module in some sense.And a lifting of the relative Frobenius rarely exists globally on X.So, the Rata case is very local in some sense.So, in this sense, I call the Rata splitting module local version.And the Formas splitting module global version.And I also remarked that the splitting module must be locally free.And the local freeness of the splitting module comes from the local freeness of the relative Frobenius.This is the point.In some sense, yes.Actually, the Formas splitting module can be constructed by gruing argument.So, this means that the completion...This is like a formal scheme kind of...OK.It's a long zero section.Yes, completion by the argumentation ideal.So, this is like considering the formal scheme of associating the embedding of X by...Next, OK.This is August Borotsky's theory.And next, I would like to mention two generalizations of August Borotsky's theory.First generalization is a logarithmic version studied by Sheprach.He generalized August Borotsky's theory to the case of fine log schemes.And the second generalization is a higher-level version.This is studied by Michel, and Lucius and Quillus.This means generalization to the case of differential operators of higher-level defined by Beftelow.OK.Now, I can give you the aim of my talk.You can easily guess from the title of my talk.Today's aim is log and higher-level version of August Borotsky's theory.OK.So, plan of my talk is the following.The first section is introduction and the second section.My construction is also based on the azimilar structure of differential operator.So, first I would like to state azimilar property of our indexed version of C4 differential operators of higher-level.I will explain the definition of this guy.And the third section, this is final section of my talk.I will try to explain splitting module of this guy.This is plan of my talk.OK.OK.Let's start next section.From now on, we are mainly working on the category of fine log schemes.And I denote fine log scheme by a single letter, such as X.OK.Let X to S be a logarithms morphism of fine log scheme defined over a field of characteristic P.Let me introduce some notation.Let F be the M plus first relative problem of X over S.No.Let pi denote the natural projection from X prime to X.So, we have the usual Frobenius diagram in log case.We have relative Frobenius and projection.And the composition of these two guys are equal to…So, what is the X prime in terms of the pullback in the final scheme?No.OK.OK.We have X over S.And we take fiber product by the M plus first iteration of Frobenius of S.And we denote it by X double prime.But in the category of fine log schemes.Later, I will assume X to S is integral.But I don't assume of cartotype.Then, natural map from X to X double prime is uniquely factored as X to X prime to X double prime.Here, the first map is required to be purely inseparable.And the second map is log at R.I denote the composition X prime to X double prime to X by…I denote this guy by…OK.Next, let me introduce the divided power envelope.Let P…So, purely inseparable is in the sense of underlying scheme or also the log structure.I think also log structure.This means it's covered with only P.OK.OK.Let P be the divided power envelope.Log divided power envelope of level R.I forgot to introduce M.Level M over diagonal.Here, M denotes a positive integer.And let I bar be the defining ideal of this exact cross-immersion.Then, associated to I bar, we have filtration I bar,so-called N-p-diadic filtration.Sorry, I bar to the something bracket N.N-p-diadic filtration of I bar.And let script P be the structure shift of this PD envelope.And let P upper N be the quotient shift of P by I bar to the bracket N plus 1.Then, this forms OX module via the first projection.And these guys form the projective system.And we take OX dual of PN.This forms inductive system.And we take inductive limit.And we put it dMX.I see pretty denoted by d.This is the shift of log differential operators of level M.And as usual, this is OX algebra.This is my terminology.Next, let me mention difficulties in the study of the logarithmic version of Org's-Bordowski's theory.First difficulty is the fact.Relative problem is not finite flat in general.This is serious because the local freedom of splitting module comes from local freedom of relative problem.So, we cannot simply generalize to the case of logarithmic scheme.And the second difficulty is our shift d.This is not as my algebra in general.Actually, in logarithmic case, we can't describe its center by the symmetric algebra of tangent bundle.Okay, so these are roughly speaking difficulties in the study of logarithmic case.But we can overcome these difficulties by using indexed algebra associated to log structureIntroduced by Roaranson and Montagnon.First introduced by Roaranson.Let me recall the definition of indexed algebra.First, let's script y with a quotient shift of group envelope of log structureby the shift of invertible function on x.Okay, first I define a by quotient of mx group times ox over equivalence relation defined by axy is equivalent to xay for any a is in ox star.and x is in mx group and y is in ox.That a is not usual algebra, but that a has a structure of a kind of algebra called iindexed ox algebra.I don't recall the definition of iindexed ox algebra, but roughly speaking this is ox algebra graded by shift i.And it is known that shift of differential operator naturally acts on a which preserves index i.And this action satisfies certain ripenitz type formula.So if we consider scalar extension of d to a, then this has natural structure of iindexed ox algebra, iindexed ox algebra.I denote it by d tilde.This is appeared in the title of second section.We will study as my algebra structure of this guy instead of usual d.So a itself is viewed as indexed by trivially indexed or is it?So when you tens of two index things, so you the index of the tens of should be something like the sum of the two.Yes, this guy.This is, so we regard ox and d as c over trivial shift.And this tensize in the sense of indexed modules.Ok.Ok, next let me introduce another indexed algebra.It is written by bm plus 1x over s, but I simply denote it by b.This is internal homomorphism of the use dm plus 1 module f r plus star d0 x prime.By the theory of Froben's descent, dm plus 1 naturally acts on f r plus star d0.And we also use dm plus 1 module structure on a.Ok.And I define map from b to a by g maps to g of 1 tensor 1.And takes a composition with map.So by the composition of these maps, we regard b is c over i.And b has multiplication and addition induced from that of a.And we also end our b with ox prime action.We are the right multiplication on this guy.We form the i index to ox prime algebra.Let me state one theorem.Provide by Roiranson and Montagnan.Is that ok?It's better that you lower one because of the light.So the camera, it's better to lower one.白いところ?Ah,白いところきすと。Yes.Let me state theorem proved by Roiranson.In the case, m is equal to 0.And also started by Montagnan.The assertion is the following.a is an i indexed locally free b module of rank.p to the r times m plus1.Here r is ox rank of log cotangent bundle of x over s.So in some sense, this theorem overcome the first difficulty mentioned above.And I would like to first theorem, theorem 1.This theorem overcomes the second difficulty.The assertion is there exists a map data from symmetric algebra of tangent bundle of x prime to d.This is map of ox prime algebra, which is generalization of classical peak curvature to the case of higher level calledp to the n plus1 curvature.I don't explain the construction better such that the tilde.This is indexed version of d.Forms as my algebra over its center.And the center is isomorphic to scalar extension of symmetric algebra to binclusion from b to a tensor beta.This is first thing.Sorry, I forgot to write the rank of as my algebra.As my algebra of rank p to the 2 times r times m plus1.20 minutes.Next section, I will explain splitting module of this guy.Roughly speaking, main result is the following.We construct this splitting module of d tilde over corresponding to that table.B tensor the completion of pd algebra.Also B tensor the completion of symmetric algebra under certaindictability assumption module p to the square.So today I will explain about the latter case.So this is local version I mentioned in the first section.Let me first define one notion.Yes, yes, yes.I explain you more detail.Now I define a certain nice lifting of the relative problem.This is my method is natural generalization of that ofGro and Lussmann Quills.First, let f tilde be a lifting of the relative problem is module p to the square.So this means f tilde is mapped from x tilde to x prime tildeand module p reduction of this map is coincided with f.And we also assume underlying scheme of x tilde and x prime tilde is flatover z over p to the square.Then f tilde is we say f tilde is a log strong lifting for any m in this section of log structure of x with a lifting with a lift m tilde in mx tilde.There exists m prime tilde.This is a section of x prime tilde.This is a lift of pi up buster m and there exists g tilde.This is a section of ox tilde such that f tilde sends m prime tilde to m tildep to the m plus1 times1 plusp timesg tilde to the p to the m.This is a definition of log strong lifting.This is a definition of log strong lifting.Locally this is equation in stock.This is a definition of log strong lifting and we can always takeLocally on x.Actually if we have a lifting of the absolute flow of news of xthen we can construct log strong lifting in a natural way.Okay.Let me state second theorem.We need additional assumptions.Let x to s be we assume this is integral and log smooth.We also assume of finite type.Morphism of fine log schemes defined over a field of characteristic pand we also assume s is natalium and assume that we are givenlet's assume we are given log strong lifting f tilde.Then the assumption is we have an isomorphism of indexed algebrasfrom d tilde tensor.The statement is quite complicated.Skate like extension of d tilde to b tensor the completion ofsymmetric algebra to matrix ring of b tensor the completion ofsymmetric algebra.A tensor o x flow of news pullback of the completion ofsymmetric algebra.So a tensor flow of news pullback of the completion ofsymmetric algebra is a lifting of a splitting module of d tilde over b tensor the completion ofsymmetric algebra.This is second theorem.Okay.10 minutes.Finally, I will try to explain the sketch of proof.The sketch of proof.First point is this splitting module.Local freeness of this splitting module.This is locally free in the sense of indexed module over d tensorthe completion ofsymmetric algebra byGuaranson and Montagno and of rank p to the r times n plus 1.So this module is locally free and also has the suitable rank.And the next point is the action of thisskate like extension on this module.I'm sorry.Is that okay?Next point is to construct an action of this is not indexed version.d tensor completion ofsymmetric algebra on flow of news pullback of this guy.If we construct such an action and by takingskate like extension to athen we have a map appeared in the theorem.And by using as my algebra property of d tildeand the fact rank of a tensor f r pastathe completion ofsymmetric algebra is suitable.We can conclude such map is isomorphismby using the indexed variant of sufficient conditionstated in the first section.So next point is this.Finally I would like to explain how to construct such action.Today I have no time so maybe I can give youhow to construct an action of d on flow of news pullback of this guy.I explain this action.The first step is to construct themorphism of divided power algebra fromflow of news pullback of divided power algebra defined by long cotangent bundle ofx prime to p.p is the structure c of divided power algebra.This is the morphism of p d algebra.To construct this guy we use strong lifting.And the second step is to constructsecond step is to construct sorry.I will explain first step later to constructpsy.And the second step is to construct along stratification of the level m onvenus pullback of this guy by usingthis Psy say,long n.Then associated to this stratificationwe have d-action onfrpasta gamma.tx prime.And by taking ox dual,dual as d-module,ox dual offrpasta gamma.tx primeis nothing but flow of news pullback ofthe completion of symmetric algebra.So we have d-action.OK,finally let me explain step one.So next I will explain how to constructpsy.First let p tilde be the log divided power envelope of diagonal ofx tilde.Then we consider the following diagram.We have this p d envelope.And we have diagonal.And we composed withtake a composition by f tilde times f tilde.This is mapped from x tilde times x tildeto x prime tilde times x prime tilde.And we also have log strong liftingf tilde.There is diagonal of x prime tilde.OK,and by using ourfinite rate assumption of finite typeand netarian,we can check that therata horizontal map factor as loginfinitational neighborhood.This is loginfinitational neighborhood of order n for somelarge number n.I denote it by psy tilde sub n.And let J be the defining idealof OP tilde to OX tilde.Then by local calculation,the image of Junder psy tilde sub n is contained inideal generated by p.So this is psy tilde sub n.And multiplication byp exclamation induces isomorphism betweenp OP tilde to p OP tilde.Because we are working on themodule p to this square.And OP tilde is flat over p to this square by our assumption.And then this guy is mod p reduction ofstructure C of divided by envelope.So this is nothing but OP.OK,this is map of OX prime module.And because this map factor throughthe ideal generated by p,this isfactor as factor through omega 1X prime tilde and also factorit's mod p reduction.And the image of this guy iscontaining the underlying pdstructure of OP.So this map naturally extendsthe divided algebra.And by taking linearization.So p was just your block withoutbefore lifting.So do you mind us what was p?What was p?P is log divided by envelopeof diagonal of X.OK,and this map,as image of thismap is contained in the underlyingp structure of OP.So by universal mapping property ofdivided by algebra,we have map fromgamma.omega 1X prime to this guy.And by taking linearization,we havethis map psi.OK,I stopped here.1is psi weighted to p curvature.Yes.Could you really explain the case?Yes,we can see the p curvature.Ah.It's OK.This map is lift of p curvature.- エンディクアリティのコンディションは、マフィスを確認するために、フラットエッセクションを確認しますか?- 実際に、エンディクアリティのアサンプションは、OPチルダイズ、フラットオーバー、ログスムースエンディクアリティのフラットオーバー、OXチルダー、- エンディクアリティのアサンプションは、OPチルダイズ、フラットオーバー、OXチルダー、OXログスムースエンディクアリティのフラットオーバー、OXログスムースエンディクアリティのフラットオーバーを確認しますか?


Hey there friends, thanks for checking in what you are about to see is a wonderful example of self-defense This took place in Los Angeles, California and the gentleman up here on the top right Behind the counter. He is the owner of the store. He is 80 years old and he is armed with a shotgun He said there have been a series of armed robberies in the area And I need to protect myself my employees and my customers. He also had video cameras installed Thankfully for us those are installed and they're working fine so we can see how this whole instance played out Once again, Los Angeles, California very dangerous area a lot of crime happening throughout the country And this was reported by CNN of all places, but it is making big news throughout the country Let's watch this Get this guy in get this guy in Get in here. Let's go This gentleman's 80 years old. He reacted within a second. I Knew and he's pointing the gun directly at me. It was a half-second three-fourths of a second. I Just I'm not gonna wait Just like that, I just did what I had to do I would always protect my employees my customers myself This instance fortunately I was here by myself, so I had to worry about that. I took care of it and that was that You see this guy right here, let's back up just a little bit see that right there That's a recoil pad and that stock right there. He's got a shotgun So we have we have the driver the guy that couldn't get in the vehicle This guy here and the initial guy who went in with the rifle There were at least four guys and they all got caught by the way and they pled not guilty But you you have two firearms that we are seeing with four guys Against an 80-year-old man and the 80-year-old man was successful with one shot With I believe to be a 12-gauge shotgun and this kid this kid went running the other kid went running Screaming he shot my arm off.  What do you expect is going to happen when you point a rifle at somebody? This is so Raise your hand if you feel bad for this kid, not me They're arrested and booked on robbery and conspiracy charges as they should have been so Here we have a huge disparity of force four or five guys. They're armed one older gentleman He if he doesn't have that shotgun, it's over He could be dead right now. His his store would have been robbed for certain many products. I'm sure would have been stolen They would have Taken whatever they wanted the cash register his life anybody else in the store But fortunately this guy took care of business and he did a great job You know these kids are now arrested. They'll have criminal records. Who knows in California. They may let him out in 24 Hours most likely it's pretty pathetic But hey, you know what you point a rifle at somebody you point any fare of it somebody You don't expect the consequences and then this 80-year-old man He took care of it, and I think he did a great job And I'm sure you do as well if you like videos like this, please subscribe and share I always appreciate thumbs up button Thanks for watching and you guys be safe


Today we're opening a Yu-Gi-Oh Binder Collection. What's up guys? We're back with another collection opening and today I had a binder that someone sent me. They wanted to sell their collection and you guys know how binders go. So I took it all out of the binder. I didn't even really know what he was sending. I couldn't remember, because I've had so many collections recently. A lot of people have been asking me. I've been having to say no recently because I'm trying to catch up and get them all. But we're gonna be opening this one. He also sent a giveaway. It appears to be a slab, based on what I can tell. So let's open this thing up. All right, inside we have a, ooh, a Magician's Valkyria PSA 10. This is I think a Korean card? Yeah, Korean card, very nice. So I believe this is for the giveaway. It's just a question mark on it. So it seems like it's a giveaway. So we're gonna be giving this away.  Let me know what you think about this collection. Let me know how much we should pay for it. This is what I always like to see what you guys' opinion on that is. All right, let's go through these. We have a few stacks of cards here. It's a pretty, like the binder is completely full. So it's pretty decent. Let's see what we got inside.  We have a guy at the Dragon Champion, cool reprint. We have the Buster Dragon. It's a bunch of new stuff for the most part. Let's see if we can find anything really cool. We got Alpha the Master of Beast, the Trap Tricks. This just got a reprint as collector rare. So I assume that kind of hurt the super rare value. Dark Ruler Hades. This is really cool because it's the Lost Art. I actually never had one of these before. So very cool looking. Instant contact. There's a lot of Poat cards in here, which is nice because Poats are really, really strong set. So a lot of good stuff to get out of there. We got Ready Fusion. We got the Libro Mansor, First Man's Ruddy Rose Dragon. I think this got a reprint. Yeah, it did get a reprint in the Megaton. So that definitely hurts that value. Geek Boy. We've got some Monju's, which are really cool, but they keep reprinting it. So eventually it's not going to be worth anything. Dunn. I don't know if your domain was like over 10 bucks last I saw, but I may not be anymore. Vampire Suckers. We've got the Animador and Archisors for those Dino decks, which are really nice. Dark Magician. We've got the Nightmare Phoenix. Pretty cool super rare, a couple of those. Zombie World, Nightmare Cerberus as well. The Decider, is that a secret rare? Very cool. This card was good in Duel Links for a while. Gallant Granite. We got number 61. The Blaze Cannon from the Wing Dragon Araset. Under Dog, a couple of those. With the Beast Guy from Flaming Eternity with Alpha. Very cool. And then Live Tune 20, Sunny Snitch has been like a dollar card for a while now. Then we have a Magician's Combination. Destined Rivals. We got a Starry Night Ceremony. Constellar Palladus. Palladus. I don't know if that's Silent or not. I don't know how to say that card. Balefire, Legacy Guard Dragon. If you guys like these collection videos, make sure to let me know. We have a couple more coming up. Like a really big one potentially coming up soon. So that's gonna be really fun opening up some really, really nice cards. And this is always fun to open even if it's just newer stuff because newer stuff is pretty nice as well. Number 76. It's just cool to see all the big hits, you know, that somebody collected over the last couple of years. This is a Seer, Metal Branch of the Burning Abyss. Very nice, premium gold. What is this third one called? The Return of the Bling? Is that the third one? We got the Cherubini, the Dante's, the Chimerite, Mega Fleets. This is from what? Armageddon? Yeah, Armageddon. The Chimerite, Rampage, Cyber Dragon, Infinities. Very nice. Secret Rare Infinity looks really, really good. The gold just, man, they just, yeah. I just don't like the gold, the new gold at least personally. The Real Dragon, which a lot of you guys agree with me based on, you know, the videos when we do Old versus New Gold. Witchcraft, Hyana or whatever. This used to be worth a lot. I don't know if it ever got a reprint. Three of those, we've got the Aruru and then the Time Thief Adjuster from Ghost from the Past. All right, so then we have a Time Thief Redor. These don't look pretty nice sleeves, which is cool. They're a little bit, they're like the Pokemon sized ones, but they're still like quality sleeves. The good thing about the Pokemon ones is you're not really gonna ding any corners because the sleeve is so big. Right, so we got the, because that's a problem with the ones that fit perfectly. Sometimes they can ding corners. You gotta be careful there. We're gonna get Magic Force. Immortal Phoenix Gearframe from Tune Chaos. Psy, Cavalry Essenturia, okay. Three, four of those, Rise of the Mega Monarchs. Remember when this was like a $70 Secret Rare and I found one in bulk? If you can follow me on Twitter, you saw that. Abrexon34, go give me a follow. We found a couple of these. They were worth $70, which was amazing. And then they got reprinted. So now they're like not very much. So Doom King, Balderock, bunch of those. Six of those, okay. Got enough for two decks there. High Ritual Arts, Dramaturs of Despia. The Faradjit, we've got Shining Nioh's Wingman. Some more Poat stuff. We have Avaris, the Genzo Laird. What's that from again? The Dragons of Legend Complete Series, that's right. The Baha Latula, la, la, la. I don't know why do you say that guy. What is that from again? Leof, that's why I don't remember because it's from Lightning Overdrive. I think we've been like maybe three Ks. There's still kind of a lot, but compared to what we normally do, not too much. Quintet Magicians, all right. Still a lot of cards to go. The best stuff is at the end because I opened it in reverse order. So like the best stuff was at the beginning of the Binder Dark Magician, the Dragon Knight. Actually a pretty decent card. Favorite contact from Poat again. A lot of play sets. So we really had play sets of a lot of stuff. Might's End Ultimus, the Desperado, the Cross Domination, we got four of those. Last Stand, Dark Worm, the Total Defense Shogun. We got an old school card here from the 10. Very cool. High Speedroid Kite Drake, okay. The Blush Shining Dragon from the movie, yeah. I wonder if this is like a personal thing like when he was a kid. Kaius the Shadow Monarch, very nice. Sales Band, the Band of the Sales, cool. Fusion Deployments, we got another Fusion Deployment, but that is not the... Yeah, he had the Secret Prismatic and here we have the Ultrarer, okay. Galaxy Cyclone, cool. Tana Racer Pankratops, these are from Dude, which I still have a bunch of these like from when I had like... I didn't even buy that much Dude, but I have like 15 boxes of it and just kept a bunch of it. More Dude, we have Gamma Seals. I think I sold all of these because they were like worth like $3. The Honest Super Rare, I don't know what that's from. Seems like it's from like some sort of deck or something. Is that a Super Rare? I think it is, it's just very subtle. Yeah, it's definitely a Super Rare. Mystic Mind, ooh yeah. I know you guys love this card, the Mystic Mind, Gold Rare. Not only is it like the most hated rarity of the new like Gold Rare, whatever they call it, Premium Gold Rare or whatever, which I'm pretty sure like they used Premium Gold Rare before and now they use it again, but it's like a different thing. It's very confusing, but it's the most hated rarity and then the most hated card. So it's the most hated card of all time. Actually, I might make a tweet about that. That's actually kind of funny now, the thing about that. Drugidity Amrogram, we got the Witch of Strike. El Shidolwenda, that's another hated card, but hey, it won the Invoked Deck, so I loved it. Verite Anaconda, Dogmatica, Ecclesia Virtuous, Nadir, Book of Lunar Eclipse, and the Ancient Warrior, Double Dragon Lords. So before there's like not anything like super expensive in here, so the value of this collection doesn't seem to be that high, but it does end pretty strong. So we'll kind of see what happens at the end. I didn't really look at everything, I just kind of pulled it all out. The Baron Blossom, we got Mugen, the Rika Ferries, the more Rika Ferries. It seemed like this might be like a Rika Core, something is a lot of Rika stuff. The Tune Terror, I don't know why that's in there. Honest, we got the Dark Mediation Role of the Dragon Knight. Is there any Alt-Art? Yeah, there's some Alt-Art in the purple. Medulche and Jelly, the Artifact Sanctum, pretty decent card. Yuki-Ona, the Ice. Myakashi, the Nice, the Ice. Okay, we got Roland, we got Mimikat. Wait, what is this from? Okay, Complete Series. So it was from the original one, it would actually be valuable. I think it's a secret we're in that though. Fossil Fusion, Specimen Inspection, these are not worth anything. Well, actually some of these cards that have Armageddon were, but mostly they were all cheap. And I remember a lot of them, you know, speaking bulk. Skizm, good card, but you only play one usually. Comic Hands, we got the Phantom Knight of Fogblade, the Skull Dread, War Rock Meteoragon. That is definitely a very high value card because War Rock is one of the best archetypes of all time. We've got the Magician, we've got the Common Dragon. Yeah, so, oh look, another old school deck card. It's sold, The Curse of Dragon, another old school card. The Chaos Daedalus, War Rockamount. There we go. That's what we're looking for, baby. Nice stuff, Stratos, Bloodstime of Dragon, the Prison, Scareclaw Lightheart, we got a bunch of those. All right, soon we are getting into the good stuff though. Stay patient, it is coming. Back to Poat, we have more Poat. Elements of Heroes, Shining Flare, Neo Swing Man, whatever he's called. Fallen of Allboss, not an Ultimate Rare, so probably not great. Sting Lancers, wait, yeah, these are probably not great either. Dawn of Majesty, we open a lot of this, open probably like a million of these. Contact C, those are common, so those actually were something in common? I don't think so. Sellerwind, Wolfraya, there's a play set of those. Youbel, the Ultimate Nightmare, Guardian Slime, Striker Dragon, Youbel, Terror, Incarnate, what is going on here? Oh, it's that case that has the circle and that one seems to be a ripped sleeve, okay. Couple more of those, these are from, oh, those are Phantom Darkness, that's actually pretty nice. That's a secret rare from GX, Legendary Collection. We have the Ultimate Nightmare, just a rare version, interesting. And then a rare version of Youbel, also pretty weird. Selenglare, I remember this not being worth a dollar. Parallel, like, seed, a really nice version. Trishula, the, ooh, the Zeus. Remember how the Mighty of Fallen, Zeus used to be very valuable. There's the reprint. The 10 reprints will just kill you, but I still want a Starlight Zeus, I think it's really beautiful. I think Rhyme Style got like a PSA 10, it looked really awesome. The Vimana, there's another Zeus, let's kind of put that together. Oh, and we're finally into some big cards. We have Sprite Blue and Sprite Blue, so we got two of those. Remember how hard these guys were to pull? Pretty difficult to pull out of Poe, but like $60, $70 still. I think there were like a hundred on release. Goaty of the Deep Beyond stuff. We got the Celtic Guardian. It might actually be an original. It is, it is. Another one main reason you can tell is because of the foil shift. That doesn't happen on the reprints.  Very good. And then Apolly and Gigantic Sprite. And that's not all the Gigantic Sprite, because we got another one. We got some Sprite Elves. We got the Garura, just a bunch of Poe stuff. Banshees. Hyper Psychic Blaster Assault mode, Ultimate Rare. So we did get an Ulti in this collection, which is really cool. Galaxy Soldiers. We got the Hertz, Borrel in Dragon, a couple of those, still a really good card, even though it's been printed out of Ghost of the Past so many times, you know. It was a high print set, so it didn't really hold a lot of value. Number 20 gigabrillion. This is a guaranteed Ultimate Rare though, like they only come, they came like as a promo, so it's really not crazy. Steel Storm Roach, the Chimera, went up like 50 at one point. Halk Vibrex, now banned, so probably worth like a sense at this point. Punishment Revolt, the Fractal, the Gold Rare, Dark Magicians, Blue Eyes, White Dragon, Skystrakers, Roast, still one of the best looking versions besides the Starlight of course, and then the Cyframe Gear Gamma. All right, we are on to the final part of the collection. It's not a huge one, it's not like crazy valuable, but it's always fun to go through these and let me know what you think about it in the comments. We have the Emergency Teleport, Harvey's Featherduster out of, I think the Godcard deck or the Sacred Beast deck, I can't remember which one. We've got two of those, we've got the Ivelzor Lagya. How's that weird like missing gold thing? It's like a misprint or something, pretty cool. The Utopia Jericho Future, wasn't this crazy for a little bit out of Kaiko? I think it kind of fell off. Couple of those, Jericho Utopia and Aura, Ashura Kings, these never were too crazy, but I pulled a bunch of them out of Poat. Chaos Space, this is a collector rare, so very cool, collector rare. Exo Sister Martha was also a really good one out of Poat. I think it was around like 20 on release, maybe a little bit less. Danger Jackalope. Joker's Knight, I think this is also a CR, which is nice. Red Dragon Archvine from the 10, which is very beautiful. I really like the 10 promos, they always look really, really good, especially on like the Synchro Dragons, look really nice. Obelisk of Tormentor, so yeah, I guess it was the Obelisk and Slifer Dex. Trihorn Dragon, that is a reprint secret rare, beautiful, triple tactics, talents from Mega 10, 2021, still a very good card. Dark Reckobium, XC's Dragon, there's another ultimate rare. XC's Reflect, here's a Orcs one, okay, I don't know much about this one, but it's from Order of Chaos, cool. Ultimate Slayer, I think we had a play set of those, so very solid card there. Elvish the Golden Lord, so we're looking at a very big one here, I think he's still around $60, because his only reprints have come in gold and like maximum gold, two or whatever, maximum gold and the maximum gold El Dorado, so you know, not a high rarity that people want, so this is the one that stays valuable. So two of those, Jack's Knight, another collector rare, so we got a few collector rears in this, Forbidden Dropline, I think this is from Duel's from the deep, yeah. So, Ultra Rare, look how off-centered this thing is, very off-centered, pretty funny. And then a Ghost Rare Dark Arm Dragon, which is pretty cool, and then a Red Dragon Archvine Ghost Rare, so pretty solid collection overall, it's a bunch of new stuff for the most part, it's not a lot of old school stuff that we usually like to see, but still a really nice collection and I hope you guys enjoyed seeing it. If you didn't, make sure to subscribe to the channel for more epic content like this, we have more collections coming up, more openings and other awesome stuff like that, so look forward to all that stuff. Shout-out to Choice333, Nightshade Gaming YT, Hayden Jameson, Squirtle, Hoppus, FlexiBoy, Dizzy, Ernesto DeAnda, Puffins of Doom, TCG, Trouser Cards, JTcho, Tomato Juice, Daxter, Tomefo Show, Ananasai Show, Christopher Ward, Ian Musa, John Nolan, Junior Barting, Mike Nance, Mimic Echo, Seth Fisher, Stanley, Thomas McLean, and Tonesy. Thank you guys for supporting the channel and I'll see you guys next time. Peace.


In this discussion, we will discuss the discussion question of describe the process for a partner withdrawing from a partnership. So if a partner leaves the partnership, there's a couple different types of ways that can happen. We're going to have to pay off the partner that leaves and then the partner leaves the partnership. So when that happens then, the question is how much are we going to pay the partner that leaves and how are we going to record that typically? We're going to look at the capital accounts and if there's going to be an agreement between the partners to pay out the partner who's going to leave the partnership. And that agreement may or may not coincide with the net value of the capital accounts. In other words, the assets minus the liabilities is the equity, the partner's equity. And the partner's equity is broken out between however many partners are there. So you would think then that whatever the partner's equity account is, we would then pay that partner cash equivalent to the equity accounts and then just remove the partner. That would be the most simple transaction, at least transaction wise, to remove the partner. Note also that a general partnership, if someone leaves the partnership, typically we'll have in essence in general, the partnership has died and then we basically remake the partnership. So anytime there's a change in partnership, technically the partnership kind of closes and then we can start basically the new partnership for that. But in any case, the capital account would go down. So if we got cash, we would debit cash and then we would credit, sorry, we would credit cash to pay the partnership from the partnership, making cash go down and then we would debit the partner's capital account and bring their capital account down to zero and that would eliminate the partner. That would be like the most easy kind of transaction we can have. Now that doesn't always happen, however, we don't always, you know, a partner doesn't always leave for the exact value of the partnership, of their partnership interest. And if they get, let's say the partner leaves and the partners are going to pay them more than the value of their net partnership interest and you might say, well, why would that happen? Why would the partnership pay more to a leaving partner than their capital account value? And there could be a couple of different reasons. One might just be that the partnership is actually valued higher than what their book value is because of something like intangible assets, maybe the value, maybe there's something like goodwill in the partnership and therefore the partnership is really thought of to be a higher value than just the net assets of the partnership and therefore it would make sense to pay one partner more or possibly, you know, they really, they actually want the partner to leave, maybe the partners, the remaining partners actually, you know, would prefer or think they can do better business or want to take the business in a different direction and are willing to pay more to remove the partner who wants to go in a different direction and maybe that's just the best thing to do. So whatever the reason is, it could quite happen. It could quite possibly be that way. If that were to be the case, then we would credit cash for, you know, whatever we paid the higher amount than the partnership interest, we would debit the partnership capital accounts to take that partner off the books. And then, of course, we would have the difference between the cash we paid and the one partner leaving the books. And the other two partners or whoever, however many partners with there are would then kind of have to reduce their capital accounts for that difference, meaning we paid more cash, we had a higher credit than the debit to the capital accounts. There's going to be debits left over that we will have to allocate. And we're going to have to allocate that typically in accordance with the profit sharing to the other two partners. So in essence, the other two partners have a transaction where they basically had, you know, a loss, right? They bought, you know, they kind of the partnership bought back the partnership interest for more cash than the value of the partnership interest. And we don't record that loss on the income statement because the partnership didn't have a loss, you know, in its generation and its normal business activities. The partners had a loss in the sale of the partnership interest, the terminating of the partnership interest. So we're going to lower their capital accounts representing the fact that the business owes them less money or the partnership owes them less money. Now, it could be the reverse could happen. Let's say that the leaving partner is now going to get paid more or less. We're going to pay the leaving partner less than his capital account balance. And you might say, well, why would that happen? Why would the leaving partner accept less money than, you know, the capital account balance? And it could be that one reason might be that the value of our assets minus our liabilities is not correctly stated in some way, meaning, for example, we might have assets on the books that are on a depreciable basis, which we may think that they're not reflected correctly. The assets may have a lesser value in them than what's on the books for. So that might be a reason why the leaving partner, we would pay less to the leaving partner. It also could be that the leaving partner is leaving. So it might be that they want to go somewhere and they're straining the partnership in that way and they might accept less money in order to do whatever they got to do within that. So the partners may end up within this negotiation process paying less than the capital account balance in the partnership. So if that happens, then we're going to credit cash, still reducing cash for whatever we pay. We're going to debit the capital account for whatever the capital account is to make it go down to zero. And we're going to have credits left over that we're going to have to then credit to the partners that are remaining. So, which is good for the partners remaining. So in other words, the partners remaining are going to increase their capital accounts in accordance with the profit sharing agreement by this excess that we had for the excess in the capital account value over the amount of cash we sold. So it's kind of like the partners have a gain here. There's kind of like a gain on this transaction. The gain doesn't go on the income statement for the same reason because the partnership didn't have a gain in their business operations. The partners had a gain in the selling of the partnership interest.


Any questions? No? Okay. Okay. Okay. Then we move on. We move on. Okay. Okay. So it's a great lesson I don't know kilometers and miles Intro take one and Action We are rolling and I officially declare action Good morning Really wrong. Horrible cuts Okay Respect the artist Here goes So Do it again, do it again, do it again We're rolling I say And Can you call action?  Hey Are you the girl? I'm just waiting Hello Chief I got your cover Today is my birthday I mean, Facebook reminded me That's how I know I do not do anything AC See what he did there Keep going, keep going You ready? Friend, close friend, best friend Glow That sounds good Alright, go You might like this Maybe someone knows the password Who? Sorry, good I should have kept That way, let's laugh first I'm clunking Has this blood bled in any country? Yeah What can I get you for today, sir? Again No, some letters No, there's nothing There's no joke, I just pronounced it wrong I'm a new slim I knew it just like that too Action This is really wrong, shut the f- I am wrong We say action Maybe she's single Maybe she isn't That'll be $30 Give me your phone Excuse me Let's just come down Yeah What's your line? What's the next line? Yes, sir, and where exactly did you find this body?  Come here Who are you? I go by the new Samsung phone Look on the payday truck I go by the new Samsung phone This is hard, this is hard, I'm sorry This is hard, this is hard, I'm sorry I go by the new...  Yeah Really?