All right, everyone, for the final time today, because I promise you that at tonight's reception, there will be no speeches.  A little bit of the behind the scenes here. I threw a bit of a Hail Mary out into the world when we were designing our agenda. I said, what would I really like to see? What is gonna highlight the themes and the idea that we are trying to focus on at this event? And I said, I'd like to get to the biggest, most important satellite companies out there to talk about space sustainability, instead of to talk about what we're competing or the market we're building or all these other really important things, I wanna say, well, what do we think? What do we agree on? And maybe not always agree, but what can we all say is an industry that is the most important? And one of the things we say at Secure World is that space sustainability, in theory, is something we can all agree on. There's nobody out there who's gonna say, oh yeah, who cares, it's not my problem 50 years from now. I mean, we understand that this matters to everyone. But one of the things we're trying to do here is to say, well, what does that actually mean? What are we doing? Are we addressing those problems? Are we addressing them fast enough? What should be our priorities? And you heard from so many speakers over the last few days about their ideas in so many areas. And so today, I'm really happy to conclude with a panel where we're gonna dive a little more deeply into how these two companies, both of whom have expressed such a commitment to this idea, but are operating in a complex, evolving set of circumstances and honestly get a lot of questions about what that means. So I hope we're gonna be able to answer some of those questions and spark some debate today, moving forward and thinking about what that looks like. So I couldn't be more pleased to be hosting our closing keynote, which is a fireside chat with Julie Zoller, the head of Global Regulatory Affairs from Amazon Project Hyper, and with Maurizio Vinodi, the VP of Space Infrastructure Development and Partnerships at OneWeb. So welcome to both of you. Thank you, Chris. Excellent, I know our audience is really excited to hear from you, so we are just gonna dive right into the questions. Quick reminder, we will save some time at the end for some audience questions, just like we've been doing throughout. So those of you online, as well as in our audience, don't forget to log into your app into the correct session. Start getting your questions in, we will be looking at those momentarily. So to start, Julie, this is the last session of a two-day summit focused on global priorities for space sustainability. How would you characterize Project Hyper's views on this issue? So just generally, what do you think? Space sustainability is critical to Project Hyper. It's been a priority from day one. We chose our constellation design, our satellite design, and our operational plans based on space sustainability. In terms of constellation design, our orbital altitudes are 590, 610, and 630 kilometers. We will actively use propulsion to deorbit our satellites at the end of mission life.  We're also planning to operate our satellites with a narrow orbital tolerance. And we heard earlier in the week how important that is in terms of the space environment. On satellite design, I mentioned we have a propulsion system, but we've also designed our components to withstand impacts from small debris and we use shielding to shield the most sensitive components like propulsion tank and batteries. Our propulsion tank is designed to leak rather than to burst if there should be an impact. We have redundancy on our satellites, so critical systems are made redundant. So if one version fails, the next picks up and takes over the mission. And finally, on operational plans, we're going to do active collision avoidance throughout our mission life from launch in early orbit through operation and then de-orbit. We will be doing active collision avoidance. Wow, that was a fairly in-depth overview of what you're planning. So thank you, that was a great way to start off. You're welcome. I want to turn to Maurizio now. Can you share with us how OneWeb sees this? What is your perspective? And I don't know, I'm going to challenge you to be as forthcoming and thorough. I think it's a good way to put it. What do you guys plan? So, Crystal, we take our responsibility to space commons extremely seriously. And this has been our mantra since the inception of OneWeb since really day one. And the first aspect is that we really strive to create a safe environment for industry, for the operators and for people on Earth. So we're really trying to execute to our commitment. So it's not just a nice narrative PR messages, but our satellites since day one has been designed for the highest level of reliability. Using a use and abuse sentence for us, failure is not an option really, because we cannot rely on the atmospheric drag for the satellites to re-enter the atmosphere at the end of life. So not only we have the highest level of reliability to ensure controlled de-orbiting, but we also design for the worst case scenario could become for whatever reason uncontrollable. And I think we'll discuss about this later. But in particular about acting and not just talking, we really look at space sustainability in six macro areas. So there's an element related to space situational essay, space situational assurance. Space traffic management is the second key element. So first of all, knowing if you have a problem and then acting upon the problem you have. So every day we receive an average of 50,000 messages out of which normally is about eight that we are really actively looking at. And sometimes we have to maneuver and sometimes it's just coordination and nothing has to be done from an operational level. Then we have ADR. Missions like the one that we'll be doing together in partnership with Astroscale, that's the third area. The fourth and fifth area are very, very close related and are the relationship that we have with the radio astronomy and with the optical astronomy community. And last but not least is a carbon footprint assessment. So in 2019 we launched a nice unsolicited assessment of the carbon footprint of our generation one supply chain. Obviously launches aside that are not particularly green but it's something that we're gonna use as a benchmark for our internal purposes for the next generation and for trying to be as responsible as possible as green as possible also from a supply chain industrial perspective. It's an interesting note to leave on in terms of are we a responsible space entity but then also what does that look like in terms of how we operate on Earth? I mean maybe we'll come back to that. I'd like to hear more about that. So both of your companies have made, as you said, it's not just PR. You've made commitments to acting as responsible stewards of Earth and space. That's how Kuiper has stated it. And being dedicated to responsible practices on the basis that space is a shared natural resource. That's from one web's website. Recognizing that the orbital volume is a shared one and I am not gonna get into all the various ways you can describe that. We're gonna go with shared one. How are your companies working with each other and with other companies and other users of space to ensure that those responsibilities are actually upheld? I'll start with you, Marie. So from our perspective coordination is key and we've been covering a lot of ground over the last few months. We are actively working and coordinating with our fellow operator Starlink. We started a journey with Project Kuiper and we recently signed a contract with the Leo Labs for space nutrition awareness and safe operations monitoring. We're also sharing data from what we see in space in terms of GPS interference, GINSS interference in general. And last but not least, just a few days ago we've announced is the next step of the cooperation with Astroscale, UK Japanese company for in orbit servicing for our satellite. So we really keep, and I actually see these, I'm not saying this is just one web that does it, but I also see these honestly from the fellow operators because the last thing that we all want is an accident because that wouldn't pay dividends for anyone. So really, really praise to the corporation that we've been witnessing. Yeah, I mean, it has to be sustainable. What about you, Julie? Completely agree with Maurizio on the need for coordination and our FCC license rightly requires that we conduct such coordination with other operators in our orbital vicinity. It's important that we share ephemeral data, covariance data, what our planned maneuvers are. We need to know where each other is, where we're going and what we're planning to do at any moment in time. You talked about the number of data messages you receive per day, it's astonishing. And it's important to develop norms so that we can streamline and simplify this process. I think that civil government has a convening role to play in helping to do that. I know that when I was at NTIA, National Telecommunications and Information Administration at Department of Commerce 10 years ago, NTIA convened a number of multi-stakeholder processes with industry to come out with standards. And one particular one that I remember was a process on consumer privacy bill of rights and how industry would be implementing that on mobile apps took a year, but it was quite successful and that convening role, a multi-stakeholder process is so important to coming to a good outcome. Excellent, I wanna do a follow up here. So we wanna get into some of the harder questions. One example of a shared use that raises a lot of questions and attention is the potential interaction between larger constellations and astronomical and astronomy observation capabilities. How are your companies interfacing with that community to address that concern? Great question. It was not long after I started at Amazon that the first articles came out about the reflectivity issues and then the astronomy community reached out to us, thankfully, and we've been engaged ever since. We participated in the SACON-1 and Dark and Quiet Skies conferences as members of the conference learning about the issues and at SACON-2, a member of my team co-chaired the industry working group and then became chair of the industry working group at Dark and Quiet Skies. Now the IAU Center for Sustainability has been stood up and my team is co-chairing the industry working group there as well. So we're very committed to working with the astronomers on this issue. We'll be launching two prototype satellites later this year and we're putting a sun shield on one satellite and not on the other so we can compare and contrast the difference between an unshielded and a shielded satellite in our very first launch. So we're excited to get data on that and to find out what we can do next. That's a great point, right? Like we have concerns but we need to really understand exactly what the options are so that's some exciting information. What about OneWeb? So it's fascinating, I was just thinking about it when Julie was talking. Up to 10 years ago, this was a non-existing problem and actually people were looking for satellite flares on the internet. Everyone was excited about the satellite flares and now with large constellations being deployed, actually a complete different angle is being presented to look at these kind of potential, potential, now challenging potential in the future. So we had a similar journey regarding the participation to the SACCON-1 and the Dark and White Skies Working Group and an active participation with Julie's colleagues for the SACCON-2. We have an open channel communication with the Royal Astronomical Society and the American Astronomical Society but what we also launched recently and recently is in the last 12 months is an active observation campaigns that is looking at measuring the brightness level of our satellites in the dark skies. Essentially is taking the signature of our satellites in space in order to assess the brightness level. This is not just done again as a PR stunt because unless you act on these things there's very little advantage in measuring the brightness level of your own satellites. So the approach that we've been implementing is that we're doing these observations in order to correlate the observations with the mathematical model that we've been developing. The mathematical model takes a geometrical model of the generation one satellites and aims at correlating predictions, simulated predictions with measured results. So why we're doing that? Because in the end what we want to do is we want to develop a tune. So once we've proven that the tool works through the correlation we're gonna be using these tools in order to optimize the design of the future generation of our satellites in order to have an ideal lower impact in the dark skies. Actually we would like to do more so we are in discussion with the scientific community in the US would like to share the code with them so they can help us to improve it and make it better and ideally we'd like to make it publicly available because it's something that could be used for the community and not just for one web. Oh, wow, that's exciting. All right, I'm just gonna keep plowing through because I have a lot of things I wanna talk to you about. So Maurizio, one of how you mentioned it earlier you have been talking about the possibility of active debris removal as one important method that your company is using to ensure that failed satellites can quickly be removed from low earth orbit. Can you tell us more about your plans in this area? Share some of the details and I'm also trying to get at how do you see this technology developing the future? How key is this to sort of your company being sustainable? So since day one our constellation our infrastructure has been designed taking worst case scenario in mind, right? So the point where the satellite could become uncontrollable. For this reason the first initial batches of our constellations are flying what we call a grappling fixture that is compatible with a robotic arm docking system. And from batch three onwards we've been flying what we call a magnetic plate for magnetic docking. So this is just to give an idea that since read inception we've been looking at a very, very responsible design for our satellites. We're also doing more. So through a partnership program that we've initiated with the European Space Agency through phase one we did initial scouting of candidate technologies and now in phase two we selected for a partnership Astroscale in the UK to develop a mission together with them to test the technology doing a real docking and the orbiting of one of our assets. So looking at technology what's really important is we are trying to act as a catalyst of a chemical reaction that would actually prove useful not only for one web but for the community as a whole. And also we are trying to incentivize diversification because the last thing we'd like to see is a monopolistic scenario because that wouldn't help really anybody. And last but not least in particular for this new business for orbit service animations what is really key is not just the technological advancement but also the advancement on the business model which is new and is a new chapter really that has to be written for the space industry. Yeah, I mean it's the tried and true engineering. We're building the train as it's moving but in almost a positive way. Like we're testing in real time. It's exciting to hear that you're planning for that and we're gonna get to see that. Not in a case that it must happen but that you're actually looking to confirm how that's gonna work. I wanna look at another area of space sustainability. So for Julie another important area is safe space operations is collision avoidance and you've both referred to that as something that is obviously of concern. No one wants to see that as you said. How does Project Hyper view the need for improved information sharing among companies? What does that look like for you? Well firstly I'll say collision avoidance depends upon having propulsion in most cases and the Kuiper system has propulsion in order to avoid collisions and to orbit rays and de-orbit. We think that all satellites operating at altitudes above 400 kilometers which is the approximate altitude of the International Space Station should have propulsion so that they can avoid collisions. In terms of data it's important to register satellites and get that catalog updated at the soonest possible moment and we'll be doing that. And to use all available sources of information both government and commercial. Where commercial sources of data are available and perhaps governments will be integrating that kind of data into the space situational awareness basic data that they provide to industry free. We have better knowledge on which to make decisions and have less risk. I'd say the other thing is to design for prompt disposal after the mission is complete and to really consider the full life cycle of the satellite from the time that you build it until the time that you retire it. Make sure that you can bring it back down to earth safely. Yeah. So it's interesting what you say about that compatibility, right? It's not gonna be either or. It's the importance and we've heard about this in some of our other panels of a variety of data sources that's gonna allow us to actually create a solution that works for everybody. You know I think that we've seen that in the last two days and that's really emphasized by what you're saying. So I have another question for both of you actually. There's another important area of space sustainability one that's often overlooked and I actually noticed we got an audience question about this as well but you'll be happy to know I had it in the list anyway. So that's spectrum. You know given that the exciting and the rapid growth of the commercial satellite sector can strain spectrum allowance what do you see as the major challenges regarding spectrum use in the future? You know how can we address that area? I'll start with you Marietta. So yeah, in the name, right? So that is one of the hottest topics. So constellations are built on spectrum. So that is the foundation of any constellation business. And it's quite clear that there is a limited number of constellations that will be able to really operate with the spectrum that within the spectrum that is currently available. So there's a first mover advantage that's for sure and the reasons why not only coordination is key but also the technological advancement is key because I like to use the analogy of real estate. So if you have a limited amount of land available whether it's New York City, City of London or Monte Carlo, if you want to start building more and more you have to move up. So same for frequency. So this reason why the tendency is to start moving up in frequency. There's been announcement about going up using e-bend. We're gonna likely move up in frequency as well for some elements of our constellation with generation too. So but again, coordination becomes key. First mover advantage is obviously key. And also what is important is technological advancement. So it's really intimately linked with coordination of spectrum. Yeah, exactly. It's not either or it's gonna be a combination of things. Absolutely. How do you guys view it at Project Kuiper? The demand for bandwidth just keeps growing and the pressure on the spectrum allocations is absolutely immense these days. All, really all satellite spectrum is shared spectrum. Whether that's with other satellite systems or with terrestrial systems. Usually both. And the rules that were put in place for non-geostationary systems were put in place internationally over 20 years ago. I'll date myself but I'll admit that I was at the 1997 and 2000 World Radio Conference. This is working on equivalent power flex density limits to enable non-geostationary systems in the KU and KA band to share with geostationary satellite systems. So those same EPFD limits that we adopted at WRC 2000 are in effect. And that takes care of sharing between geos and non-geostationary systems. But as Mauricio noted, we have to coordinate with each other. And that is a complex process because we're both moving all the time and figuring out how to reach coordination agreement requires a lot of hard work and good intent on both of our sides in order to get there. But it works at the end of the day. It's really important that as we mature the technology and evolve designs that spectrum efficiency is foremost in our minds and that we're thinking about small spot beams, spectrum reuse, the ability to be agile as we're sharing with other users, especially non-geostationary systems. And look for ways to establish permissible interference levels that allow us to come to a common baseline for our agreements. Yeah, I like to think of it. Sometimes the policy can move slow. I mean, that's a great way of thinking about it. You know, that we are dealing with something that is not up to date in the way that it needs to be, but that it's also about technology. That again, it's a theme that it's, we have to be looking at all these solutions. There is no one single way to address space sustainability. We need to be looking at and attacking it from so many different ways. So thank you for that. I know some of, I find there are two types of people in the space industry. Those who are very interested in spectrum and those who like to pretend it's not a problem. So I had to ask about this because it is really important as you both just said. So for Maurizio, in an interview last year with Space News, your CEO Neil Masterson who we saw briefly earlier today, he starts the importance of industry collaboration, responsible behavior and how this can complement regulatory efforts to ensure space sustainability. But what does that balance actually look like? You know, Julie earlier mentioned the convening power of government is one important aspect of that. But what does that balance look like for you? Where is there a need for additional regulation and where should industry lead the way? So normally in the way we interface with the national regulatory body, we are not too prescriptive. And obviously we have to align and comply with national regulations for the markets we want to operate in. This said, we try to be as vocal as possible. And actually these week last week we released our responsible space, White Paper which is really summarizing our key principles and what we would like to suggest the regulatory body to start looking into and implement in order to ensure responsible and sustainable use of space as a natural resource. And the reason why we released these White Papers is that we would like to use these in our conversations with the key regulatory stakeholders and really outlines about 20 key guidelines that we would like the space community to act on. And last but not least, there's an element they would like the national regulators so we'd like to urge them to start thinking which is the size of sovereign backed constellation which is an element that the sheer number of satellites that are gonna be launched in space that regardless whether we're gonna do it sustainably or not responsibly or not, it's something that we need to address together as a community. Okay, similar to a different question Julie. So your counterpart, your colleague CalPAC, Guide recently commented on this issue as well. And what he said was that he highlighted the need for public-private partnerships and as you mentioned earlier, government convened industry groups particularly around standards development and other issues. He pointed out also a really important point that space-sustainable issues are not confined to one country which we're seeing here. I mean, we have folks from all over Europe, the US, the UK, Africa, Asia who really, really committed it and interested and worried about the problem. So can you tell us more about what kinds of government-led solutions you would like to see if space-sustainable is a global issue? How can global forums help advance this issue? I think that global forums like this one can help advance the conversation and a common understanding of how to move forward together in unison. We heard today about the importance of speaking with one voice. It's also so important that on the government side that governments come to a common understanding because we're global systems. And it's very difficult if there is a patchwork of norms or standards or rules to adapt to each different environment. So I would say a coordinated effort on that. It's important for government also to invest in space situational awareness technology to improve the ability to track small objects, to give faster data with more precision. We also heard today that you take four people in a room and they've all got their own data sources and they differ in substantial ways. And the calculations that are derived from those data sources yield different results. So coming into consensus on norms for data, having more precise data, I think is a very important role for government and then that convening power that governments have to develop the norms. All right, well I know you're all waiting for this but I wanna turn to the audience portion of our questions. We have some great ones coming in. Some of them touching on topics. I'm gonna jump one into how they picked out. There it is. This guy, you touched on this a little earlier but the house-based sustainability plays into a business case. So there's a couple of questions here on that. One of them is, so the theme of a healthy commercial competition was actually raised on a panel that we had earlier today on winner governments and they're asking, do you agree that competition between countries like companies, companies like yours, does that help advance sustainability? Do you think that it helps keep you accountable or do you think that there's a risk that a less sustainable actor might beat you to the finish line? Like how do you build competition and sustainability?  I do like competition because pushes for, makes you uncomfortable to certain extent, right? And pushes you to think. And not to take anything for granted. I think that if you only had one solution, monopolistic scenarios are never good. Not for business, not for innovation, not for responsible and sustainable behavior. So I think actually it's a stimulus in order to think more responsibly and to use technology and innovation in a positive way. Okay, what do you think, Julie? I like competition as well. It absolutely keeps you on your toes. It inspires innovation and it brings lower prices to consumers and better products. And so it's essential and I think that applies in this area as well. Social consciousness is very high today and I think that a company who disregards space sustainability is not gonna be a company that consumers want to do business with. It's interesting you said that because your companies actually are quite a forward-facing or will be as you expand your services. You're quite a forward-facing part of our industry. I have to admit I was home talking to my parents and they were more aware of what companies like yours are doing than many of the others because it has a bit more of a direct link to service in some ways, right? I mean I think what you're saying about consumers is a really interesting point that we don't get into very often that it's not just ourselves and we heard yesterday in our media panel kind of the media world online. It's actual consumers who have a say in this. So I think that's a really great point. Here's another one kind of related but a little different and kind of a key to my heart since I work for an organization that only focuses on space sustainability. So this question is, where does space sustainability sit in terms of other commercial technological and strategic priorities that you might have as a business? You've both said where companies are committed to it but where does it rank in terms of your other priorities? Oh, who wants to go first? All right. I'll go. It's in the forefront because if we don't have sustainable space, the orbits to which we're going to deploy our satellites will not be usable. And if that happens, then the services that we're bringing to customers, low-cost, high-speed broadband are going to be impaired if even possible. It's a must-have, not an easy to have. Awesome. What do you think? Fully agree. So is we doing the right things now? In order to be able to use space in the future? Unfortunately, space is unforgiving so we really need to think ahead. And there are ways, as you know, both our companies are demonstrating to act responsibly and at the same time be successful. It's not either or. Yeah. I mean, I, as a space enthusiast, that's so important to me, right? And it's just so many people that we all get really excited about this and that's great. But we do want to make sure that what we're doing has that benefit. I mean, I think people assume that we care, sometimes we say this is, you know, we care about space sustainability, not because space is cool, but because we're actually doing all these things that we need in it. Exactly. We asked, this is a kind of a paired question to one of the things we talked about earlier. So I asked you about active debris removal, but there's a question here about Project Kuiper's plans on that.  Yeah. So I mentioned earlier, we chose our orbits, the highest of which is 630 kilometers, in part because of space sustainability. So we can actively remove our satellites from orbit using propulsion at the end of life. So in that sense, we're not using a third party to do active debris removal. We are the active debris remover. At that altitude, our satellites will, through atmospheric forces, deorbit in less than 10 years. So, okay. That's, I have to admit, I'm not in the most technical of people. So I encourage, yeah, I mean, that's what we need to know. This is where we're exploring what's happening. Yeah, I think the most important thing is, using propulsion to remove a satellite from orbit is active to debris removal. Yeah, exactly. It's how we think about that word. Yeah. And sometimes it can be really fun to get caught up in the really neat technologies that are coming from some of your friends sitting in the audience. But it's a great point, Julie. We've got a couple of, a few more questions. I'm gonna do a couple of technical ones and one political one. So we actually had a keynote yesterday, virtual, unfortunately, Director Dalbella wasn't able to join us in person, but it was his first opportunity to talk about their plans. And so one of the questions that we have here is kind of let's see what industry's response to that is. So the question is, what are new or improved services you might be looking for from that office? And I'll broaden it a bit and say, what are you looking for from governments right now? This is specifically if they take over civil STM responsibilities. You both have a lot of business based in the US as well as abroad. So what are you looking for in the area of STM right now? Just start. So I think that coordination, I'm repeating myself, but coordination among operators is key. And I think that at this moment in time, coordination at industrial level is extremely effective. So it's working extremely well. So I have to confess I wasn't here for that keynote yesterday, but I think we should be extremely careful in considering government regulators to take ownership of space traffic management. I would really like to approach this in a very, very careful way. It's something that needs to be considered with a lot of attention. What is important is that either in an industrial private way or in a centralized way, we ensure that the time between need to action and action is minimized. And we are doing this as Julie said, sharing our two line elements, our femoris, our covariance information among each other and with the scientific community. We have private and institutional operators, if you want helping us with tracking our assets and raising alerts. And we have a kind of a red line open with our fellow operators that allow us to operate as safely as possible. Another analogy that I always use is because we want to act responsibly on rules that we try to impose on ourselves. And the analogy I always use is kids playing with the PlayStation.  If the grades are good, they can play with the PlayStation as long as they want. If the grades at school start coming down and they don't behave responsibly, well mom and dad then will start regulating how much time they can spend on video. And this is what is happening now. I think it's the perfect analogy. So we have an extremely good dynamic among operators and at this point in time, my personal view is that it's working, it's not, nothing is ever perfect and being proved, but it's working really, really well. And we should try to stick to that. Yeah, we've had a lot of really fun analogies about with children, we had one on textbooks. So I appreciate that, I mean, it's true. And as we've said for several things, it's gonna be both, right? It's gonna be what you guys need to do, but then also finding those appropriate times. Did you have anything you wanted to add on that, Julie? Just how encouraged I was by Richard's plans for the office and improving the quality and timeliness of space situational awareness data. I think that's great and that he's planning to put up a web API, also wonderful news. Give another plug for development of better tracking mechanisms so we can track smaller data. And I know he's considering as well the role of commercial sources of space situational awareness, which is another welcome idea. All right, we're gonna do two more kind of, there's some really good questions in here. And there's some that are a little, I don't wanna say simpler to answer, but a little more specific. I'm gonna do kind of a rapid fire to each of you on one of these just so I can get to a few and then we're gonna wrap up with my final question. So let me see, I hadn't picked up. So this one is for you. I'm gonna kind of paraphrase a little bit, but we've got several questions asking about launch, which we haven't touched on as an aspect of space sustainability. And I think everyone knows that one web has run into some issues in that area lately. So tell us how you're approaching launch right now. I mean, that is also a part of space sustainability. Yeah, so my opening remark is that I think that a few of you have read the book eccentric orbits about to read you. Maybe I feel we're gonna write one about one web one day. So I'm taking my notes. So, we've been hit by the international crisis. We are supposed to complete the deployment of our constellation with another five launches with Soyuz is not gonna happen anymore. We've been lucky enough in March to sign in less than 72 hours an agreement with SpaceX for a few Falcon 9 launches. And a few weeks later, it has been followed by announcement of signing with an SIL, what was Israel before launching with GSLV Mark III. So this is our plan. So considering the geopolitical situation, I would say that we've had an incredible turnaround with great support from both SpaceX and the Indian Space Agency. So our plan is to be back on the launch pad in quarter four after the summer and to have complete deployment of the constellation by quarter two next year with all satellites in space. And then we'll do the orbit raising and we're gonna be in service with global coverage 24 seven by the end of next year. Excellent. You mentioned, we were talking a little bit about collision avoidance earlier. And so there's a question on here that I'm gonna direct to you about material selection actually. Not getting too specific. But you know how have you balanced material selection to withstand impacts of small debris without fragmentation or with minimizing re-interest? I guess I'm just saying, talk to us about how your thoughts behind what you're building. What are you putting in technologically on these satellites? I thought that was kind of a really interesting detailed question. Yeah, it's a, and I'll preface this with, I'm not the expert on satellite design and choices in this area, but I do know that it's a complex set of trade-offs because more robust materials may not devise and both are important. So one of the reasons for using shielding is to protect critical components in case of impact. Interesting, yeah. So we've touched on a lot of things. We've covered a lot of grounds. I wanna thank, first of all, thank you to both before my concluding question. I know, I should give Mauricio a shout out. There was some incredibly complex travel arrangements. I'm told in an emergency flight to get you here. So we really appreciate it. And Julie, you've been able to join us and it's been delayed to get to know you in the last two days. So I wanna conclude with a question which is we spend two days talking about this. And so I wanna give you both the opportunity to say, you know, if the audience can take away one message today from your two companies about space sustainability, what do you want that to be? What do we wanna go away thinking about? I'll start with you. From my perspective is a call for action. So we are not, he is not, you know, every man for himself. We really hear on the same boat as a community. And the time to act is real now. Some operators, some players, you know, have been doing since inception, since day one. We really hope that this call for action will also incentivize the rest of the industry at any level from prime contractors to operators, prime contractors, to one, two, and three, three, two, to act sustainably and to keep these in mind. And last but not least is just not all about technological development as I was referring around to, but also about new business cases and new business plans. Excellent.  We are a long community and the time to act is now, which is why we're having this, right? We really wanted to, we've spent all this time pointing out some of those areas and looking at, I mean, I think you were all here for the ASAP this morning. That's obviously a huge one. We haven't even touched on that at all for this panel. These are, the time is now. And these engagements, these gatherings are a perfect opportunity to thank you very much. But more importantly, I want you all to go away with these ideas. So thank you for that. Julie. We're all in this together. No question about it. And we have to work together to meet the twin goals of having a sustainable space environment and a robust, innovative and inclusive satellite industry that can provide those critical services that we need for humanity. I share the optimism that I heard on a video interview last week with the founder of Leo Labs and Bloomberg. The optimism about being able to solve these problems. The acceleration of technology in space over the past 15 years has been unprecedented. And I think we're gonna see a Moore's Law sort of acceleration now that we have more NGSO constellations like ours and solutions to these issues will come forward. Well, we are certainly behind that. So with those inspiring words, that is the conclusion of the summer for space sustainability minus the fun bit, the extra fun bit, which is gonna be shortly. So first of all, a round of applause for our two panelists. So I have one announcement and then I'm actually told I have to see the stage. I've been overruled by my boss and my co-host. So my announcement to all of you is come drink, come hang out. We have the generous support of our sponsors and we are really excited to welcome you all to the most appropriate venue I could find in the city, the Exploring Space Hall. For those of you online, I also wanna thank you. We are doing our best to hold a hybrid event. I'm gonna say we're learning and we are really excited that everything that you see today is actually gonna be available. And yesterday's gonna be available online. So if you missed a bit or you were off having a meeting or if you had to step off when you were in our online community, don't forget that our information is available. We'll get those posted and get that information out to everybody. If you have comments or feedback, you know me by now, let me know, send us notes and let's keep this conversation going. So again, thank you for me to all of you for being here and I am going to step off the stage with my fellow panelists and I invite Peter and Jacob to the stage. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.


These episodes are starting to stress me out, man! Episode 122 of our MHA Watchthrough, Katsuki Bakugo Rising. It feels like similar. What was the episode last season for Sugar Rocky? Was it Origin? That kind of, that title format kind of reminds me of that. So, seems like we got a Bakugo Highline episode. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the channel. My name is Jack the Buster. I, Shinobi, I'm not gonna waste any time since it is spicy. If you're new to the channel, drop us up and hit that big blue bell and let's get started. Okay. All right. Okay, all right. Yep, yep, I know. It hit him. I know. Let's just see the predicament we're in now. Thanks! Hey, what is that? What? Wait, what? This cut his entire leg off? Why would they put that before the intro? Oh my God! He really just cut his leg off. Was it too late? Oh, it wasn't! Wait, no one did start to fade. I don't think it was too late. I think he did stop it. Oh my gosh. Oh my gosh. God! Give a leg! Oh my God! Oh my God, he erupts into his face. Oh my! Oh my God! He ripped right into his face. No, he's okay. He's okay. I think. Oh my gosh. Wait, what about Torino, too? Dude, this is nuts. This is nuts. No way are we cutting away from this right now! Brother! House arrest boys? Please, go back! Gran Torino and Aizawa are like critical! Makius coming. He's coming. He couldn't stop him. He's tearing through everything. It's like a one punch level villain, but no Saitama.  Oh my gosh. For some reason it does remind me a lot of one punch, man. How Makius is just tearing through the cities. Just bulldozing them. Dude, they're all so hopeless. It felt like both battles were one is a crazy thing. It made us feel like both were one. A hoax is all bandaged. And then it just flipped everything on its head when Sugar Aki popped out and Makia popped out. They weren't like, they weren't at the bar? Like deemed worthy enough to be the enemy? Oh, true. They were brave as hell, man. Oh, he saved them all. He just sent them away. It was all you could do. Yeah, did as much as you could. Like them having done that like started this. I mean, that's kind of the theme of the season though. And that's what Sugar Aki and Dabi and them are saying is like, who's right? When in reality it's like the hero, they're trying to do what's right. But it's like, what comes with that? Yeah, we're back. We're back. Hell yeah. Hell yeah. Dude, Grants Harino. Dude, he looks rough. He can't even look at him anymore. He might have stopped the thing from going off, but he definitely can't use his fork. Oh, Deku's pissed. What just happened? He just tore.  Oh, and he didn't even realize he moved past his limits. Like super recovery is trying to like catch up. What? No, he isn't realizing that he wasn't in the time required. It wasn't at 100%. He was at like 75. He said it wasn't perfect. That's why I said it's going to be the key. The quirks might have been transplanted, but his body wasn't ready. He liked me for real. He's trying to get used to it. I didn't even think about preparing it to Deku. He can use his quirks now, man. That changes everything. Oh gosh. Come on, Deku. It's your show. It's your time to bump off, baby. Oh, he lifted him. Hell yeah. So he can't get into the decay to them. That was so smart. Oh my gosh. Holy. He's okay. Oh, great. He knows okay. Oh, it awakened. Okay. We got two extra ones then. It's going to, it's going to, I knew it. Yeah. It's like I can get like a feel for those bad boys coming these days.  This is, I mean, dude, that's not, that shouldn't be what his mindset is.  No, you just need to do what you can do. Oh dude. Hey, Bakugou's in the title. You better bump off, man. That's a pretty metal line all the life. Bakugou? Is he about to pop? Oh, he's about, we're getting backstory or a flashback. He is about to pop off to another level. Title, flashback. Oh my gosh. What is Deku's hair? What? Yeah, what? What? Wait, it's because he blew up his hair? Bakugou-kun! Oh shoot, it is about to set up for a crazy Bakugou power spike. Just little hands together. Not kind of setting up the timeline of when this happened, they see. Yeah, it feels so weird that All Might isn't there to like see this or like, I mean, he might be watching on TV if they're showing it. If they're even able to. No, actually, there's no helicopter or anything. There's no way that it's on TV. Can we really halfway through the episode? Oh my gosh. We're quiet. Wait. Gang Orca has his own water brand? I love that. Yeah, because then people can start putting the pieces together. And like, oh, he's getting all the other one for all's abilities. It's weird seeing Bakugou this like, he knows how dire it is. Maybe because he's scared or he doesn't understand it? Yeah. He has, yeah. Bakugou knows that growing up with him. Damn. Damn. He's the only person who would admit that too, too. I think. Bakugou doesn't hold that grudge against him. Oh, okay. He just wanted to tone through his actions, not his words. Dude, this is like a moment where he's like, dude, like everything's collapsing. Good hit, Deku. Let's go, baby.  He's just smiling still. Guys, just staring him in the eyes. You got to pop off, Deku. God damn, that's what I like to see. He's willing to do that right now. God, he almost looks unconscious. Maybe he partially is. He's just like free flowing, letting these hits hit him. He's ready. Yes! Some fat hits. Yeah, everybody blade their part. Oh my gosh. That's such a cool shot. Dude, he's reaching for his limit. Bakugou does step in. He could really destroy him. Go help him! It's all endurance, baby. Yo, got more on your side here for a reason, aside from the Nomus. First aid. Oh, shoot. Oh, shoot! Bakugou and Todoroki! And it never. Oh, shoot. God dang right! God dang right! Oh my god.  This is the end of the world! Hell yeah. They're heroes. The glass radius, yeah. Can Deku get out of it? Oh, this feels daunting. But it's like kind of like... Like, why is Bakugou in the title?  That's gonna save them. Damn! What a flashback. Oh my god. Hell yeah, baby! God, he's like pulling him back. He's whiplashing him. Oh my god. Dude, why do I feel like he's gonna kill himself? Oh my god! What? Oh Bakugou. He's not taking the hit. That's not what all of this was for! And why? Why do I watch this weekly? That's why it's with a flashback with Ormite because it's the power that has to keep on going and others have to like slowly fall as they push Deku up higher and higher. Good god, man. Dude, Endeavor's saying, Why aren't you dead? He's like, dog.  But he's looking like Armin. I don't know why I watch weekly. This is so painful, man.  My goodness. This is getting more and more disastrous as time goes on. That's been it for episode 122 of our MHA Watcher, Katsuki Bakugou Rising. I'm so glad we're only like a third of the way through the season. If this was like halfway, I'd be kind of depressed. We got a ways to go, baby. Catch you in the next one.


Here we are in California for the Western States 100. I'm going for my three mile, three mile jog. When you're watching this, the race has actually already started. So make sure you follow along. I'll be giving updates, Twitter, Instagram, especially a little bit on Facebook as much as possible. But of course, then editing the vlog later tonight for all of you, all of the epic footage that is captured out on the course. So it's going to be crazy. All right, let's go get three miles in. Foot's feeling good. Foot's feeling good. We're in Truckee, California right now, heading to Squaw Valley here in a minute. Here at a random field in Truckee, California. Okay, the first finisher of the Western States 100. His name is Gordy Ainsley. In 1974, ran basically, from what I understand, he did not buy a horse in the spring of 1974 to do the horse race. So he decided to run. This is like back in the early 70s when ultra running was really not a thing that you did. So he probably was looked upon as a very, very unique individual. And in 1974, it was just Gordy. There was no other runners. But then in 77, 14 runners towed the line for the first official Western States 100 race. I think, I don't quote me, but I think there was three finishers that year out of 14 starters. All right, let's go to Squaw. Did you know that the 1960 Winter Olympics were held at Squaw Valley? That's amazing. I can't imagine what this place looked like in the 60s. Probably just not much going on up here. So look at this mountain up here. Look at this. Pretty impressive on the starting line. It's basically what I pictured. The mountains in California, they're different than Colorado, that's for sure. Not as tall, but they're pretty, you know, pretty aggressive, pretty steep out here. Anyway, let's talk about the course real quick. I've got some stats on the elevation gain. I love elevation gain, just knowing what's going to happen out there for all the runners. Let's break it down. First of all, you should know that the course is 100.2 miles. That's right. They extended the course, I believe, in the mid 80s to just make sure it's over 100 miles. So it finishes in Auburn, California. So we're in Squaw Valley right now, finishes in Auburn, California, and it finishes on actually on a high school track. I have the name. I'll get you the name here in a minute. Anyway, it finishes on a high school track, which adds the 0.2 miles around the track for the finish. And as far as elevation gain, all right. So right now, Squaw Valley is 6,200 feet above sea level, or 1,900 meters for everyone outside the U.S. The highest point on the course is Watson Monument, which is 8,700 feet above sea level, or 2,600 meters. All right. Now there is a 22, no, no, no, sorry, 18,000 feet of elevation gain over the 100 miles and 22,000 feet of elevation loss, which in meters, 18,000 translates to 5,500 and then 22,000 feet translates to 6,700 meters. So there's actually more elevation. There's almost basically 4,000 feet of elevation loss over the 100 miles on this course.  It's like, even though it's net downhill, it's a very, very difficult course. So that is the course breakdown. All right. We're just getting here waiting for the, I believe there's going to be a meeting here with all of the runners here in about an hour. So we're waiting for that. Just getting shots of the start, finish line, talking to some fans, shout out to Tristan. Thanks for saying hello. He works for Sun2. That's pretty cool. I sported, I showed him the Sun2 in the Peak 3, an old school watch that I got. It's just so neat to be here, see, see these folks, man. Awesome. What's up? Nice rig. What's that? Yeah, I know. Who could afford that? Is it an Ari? Yeah. Just geeking out about camera gear with a guy. By the way, look at the size of these pine cones. All right, everybody. We're at Squaw Valley. Meet Forrest Forrest and I. Forrest is a fan of the vlog. Watches regularly, right? Absolutely. So he just came up, came up and said hello. So thanks for saying hello, man. It's going to be a fun day tomorrow. Absolutely. A ton of fun. Yeah. Epic two races, men and women. I always like to ask, do you remember how you found the vlog? Like did something? I think I was looking for a shoe. Okay. Like this shoe when it came up. Yeah. So I've been watching maybe like a year. Yep. Boom.  A year. That's something like that. So last summer. I think so, yeah. Because that's a lot earlier than a lot of folks. So that's awesome. Appreciate you. About a year. Yeah. Appreciate it. No, it's fun. Yeah. You always stay positive and that's what I like to put forward. Trying, right? Yep. It goes a long way in running, like staying positive. Yeah. Keeping that mindset. Yeah. Through the highs and the lows of training. Exactly. Injuries. Exactly. I just want to mention here at the start line real quick, both of last year's champions are back. Most of you already know that. Courtney DeWalter on the women's side. Jim Walmsley on the men's side. They're times last year. Courtney ran 17 hours and 27 minutes. And then, and that was the second fastest time ever on the Western States course behind Ellie Greenwood's 1647 in 2012. And then Jim last year ran 14 hours, 30 minutes and four seconds. So this is where it's going to go down tomorrow morning in almost 12 hours from now. A little over 12 hours. So welcome to the 2019 Western States Ignorance Runner. In the pre-race meeting, that was awesome just to see all those elite runners together in one spot clapping for each other. Just that was special in there. So, and then you see footage of, this is Gordy. So he's actually standing right behind me. He was the first runner to run the Western States course in 1974. So that's Gordy on the screen right there. You see pictures of him, but it's cool to see. He's actually pretty tall. And as you saw in the room there, so many runners. Good luck to all the runners. I just want to mention the highest finish percentage. So how many runners actually make it to Auburn was in 2012 when 316 of the 382 participants crossed the finish line under the allotted time. And so, and then also I wanted to mention, so Scott Jurick, actually I saw him in the crowd today. Scott Jurick has the most wins on the men's side with I believe it's six. I'm going to count it from 1999 to 2005. And then on the women's side of course, and Tracen. I think it's 14. I will confirm that now. Anyway, just epic this happened in here. All right. We are actually heading back to the motel to start editing this vlog so we can go to bed so we can wake up to film tomorrow for all of you. Oh, this is so cool. All right. Good times. And welcome back to the motel in Truckee, California. Here is my current status update right here. Oh my goodness. Yes. We're editing like there's no tomorrow uploading and most importantly charging. These are all the batteries that are charged right here. Moving down into the sunlight a little bit for you. So we're still charging plenty and yes, keyword is going to be cougar. Why? Because did you know that the men's and women's champion of the western states 100, they win a cougar bronze. It's amazing. Like it's a really nice, I don't want to call it a statue, but it's a trophy and it has a cougar on it. So it's really cool. So that is the keyword and the question of the day. Do you have a 100 mile race on your bucket list? And I realized this is a very strange sport that we do. I mean, who wants to run 100 miles, right? That's kind of a painful experience, but it's also a life-changing experience. So that's the question of the day. Thanks for hitting it up down below and follow along everywhere. It's just going to be amazing. All the social media. Thanks for being here. All right, see beauty, work hard. Love each other.


Your Excellency, my friend, President Emmanuel Macro, C.P.U.S. Goal, Commerce and Industry Minister, C.Jyotiraditya Sindhya, Minister of Civil Aviation, Sri Ratan Tata, Chairman of Tata Trust, Sri A.N. Chandrasekharan, Chairman Tata Sindhya, Mr. Capel Wilson, C.E.O. Air India, Mr. Geom Fori, C.E.O. Airbus. First of all, I thank Air India and Airbus for this landmark agreement. For this agreement, I thank my friend, President Emmanuel Macro, for this important deal. Along with the deep ties between India and France, I also thank the success of the Civil Aviation Sector and the success of the Civil Aviation Sector. Today, our Civil Aviation Sector is an important part of India's development. To strengthen the Civil Aviation is an important aspect of our National Infrastructure Strategy. In the last eight years, the number of airports in India has increased from 74 to 147. That is, almost twice as much. Our regional connectivity scheme is connected with the air connectivity of our country's own parts by increasing the social development of people. In the near future, India is going to become the third largest market in the aviation sector. According to many scholars, India will need more than 2,000 patients in the next 15 years. Today's historic engagement will help to fulfill this increasing demand. India's Make in India, Make for the World vision, is opening many new opportunities in aerospace manufacturing. For greenfield and brownfield airports, 100% FDI has been provided with automatic roof. Similarly, ground handling services, maintenance, repair and overhaul, 100% FDI has been provided in MROs. India can become the hub of MROs for the entire region. Today, all global aviation companies are present in India. I invite them to take full advantage of these opportunities. Friends, the understanding of Air India and Airbus, India and France are both important partnerships for the strategic partnership. A few months ago, in October 2022, I took part in the defense transport aircraft project in Barodhra. The project is also part of the 2.5 billion Euro investment. I am also happy to know that the French company is building the biggest MRO facilities in India for the service of the aircraft. Today, the international order and multilateral system, India, France, and the rest of the world are in the process of establishing the international order and multilateral system. Whether it is about security and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, or the security of the basic food security, India and France are also providing the services of the military. President Macron, I am confident that this year our bilateral relations will touch on new heights. We will get more opportunities to work together with India's G20 industry. Once again, thank you all very much and good luck.


Today we are opening an $8,000 Yu-Gi-Oh collection. What's up guys, we're back with another epic video and today we're opening an $8,000 Yu-Gi-Oh collection that I purchased, but first we have to give, I'll be giving away this first edition Metal Raiders Catapult Turtle. All you have to do is like this video, be subscribed, turn notifications, let me know your favorite card from the collection. I'm assuming there's a lot, I don't even know everything in here, but I'm excited. First we have some commons and the classic 2003 Kaiba 10, which is pretty cool.  Then we have more commons in the Summon Skull 10, cool. Then we have a good old eBay Authenticity Guarantee. If you don't know what this is, check out my Ruxen Live channel. I made a video about how bad this thing is, but there eBay's doing this Authenticity Guarantee thing. It's garbage, but let's see what he put in here. So we got a Levia Dragon Daedalus BLS, cool. Chaos and Bird Dragon, Chaos and Bird Dragon, limited removal and Buster Blader. Those are some good reprints right there, very solid stuff. And then of course, the Flame Wing Man. This is probably the UD E-Print, I guess. Yeah, definitely, Silver Stamp. Okay, so this one, not very valuable compared to the real one. The Gold Stamp is much more valuable than this one because this was counterfeit. I also have a video about this, so go check that video out, as well if you have not seen it. More bulk in here, okay, that's gonna be interesting. More bulk. We have an unlimited Star Deck Joey Sealed, very nice to see. So a lot of this stuff will be for sale. So I bought this collection from the guy and I've bought a lot of collections recently. A lot of you guys have been trying to sell your collection, probably due to everything going on with the economy and everything like that. We've committed to a lot of collections and if you guys are interested in anything you see, make sure to hit me up. If I've got an Instagram, might be on TCG player, stuff like that. If there's anything that I need for my specific decks, obviously I'm gonna keep those. But you can ask and if I say that, no big deal. I'm not gonna be offended if you ask. All this stuff is top-loaded, which is really cool. So we have a Master Collection one, also Dark Necrofear. So it looks like the Master Collection set. I probably split this up right in the middle of the six. There's a Dark Necrofear for Legendary Collection three that's Yu-Gi's World Promos. We have the, what is this? U-E, the Ultimate Edition or whatever it's called. There's the Master Collection. Then the Exodia, that's five of the six. We're missing one. Blackhorn of Heaven. I don't know why this got a top-loader. Rope of Life, Buster Blader. Yeah, some of this stuff I'm confused on why these are in top-loaders because they're only a couple bucks, but I guess he liked them, so very cool. We've got the C-R-E-U, very cool DDS promo. I love this card, very nice looking. The pink just looks nice. It's the less desired of the DDS because you want Exodia, Blue Eyes and Dark Magician, obviously. But this one I think is really cool as well. Then we have Green Baboon. We have Obelisk, the Tormenter. Blue Eyes, White Dragon. Blue Eyes, Spirit Dragon. Ghost Rare, Red Dragon, Archfiend. There we go, that's our biggest card so far. And then we've got the Wing Dragon of Ra from New Ghost from the Past 2.  I mean, the prices came down a lot on Ghost from the Past 2, but very cool. Here's an FL-1 Secret Rare. This has a little bit of value for the Blue Eyes. Summon Skull from BPT. Oh yeah, I love this one. This is the BPT for 2002. Cards just look insane. Buster Blader, this is 2003. Dark Magician, 2003. Blue Eyes, 2003. You can tell that this is 2003 by it being 009 versus 003. Also, there's no limited edition. So then there's 008. Yeah, so 7 through 12 are all 2003. Then Genzo, of course, very cool. And Thousand, that's a trick. There's the other one that we were missing from the Master Collection for the promos. But wait, 50% of you guys are not subscribed to the channel according to this graph. So go down below and click that subscribe button. All right, next up. Graceful Dice, very cool card. Vampire Lord Reprint. Like why are some of these top-loadered and then those other nice reprints were not? So it's very interesting to me. I guess he just ran out of top-loaders or something. Three Vampire Lords, okay. Kaiser Glider, that's first edition. That's not a reprint. That's a reprint. We got the Guardian. Guardian, grr! Okay, we've got the Blast held by a tribute. Cost down. Spell Canceller, Unlimited MSC, okay. The XYZ, or the XY Dragon Cannon, different. Metal Morph, FMR, this is actually has some value. Zoa, Metal Zoa. This one looks like it has some corner issues and stuff. Cosmo Queen from the original McDonald's pack. Very, very cool. What else we got here? We've got, okay, Alpha, Beta, and Gamma. The original Duel of the Roses, correct. Yeah, Duel of the Roses, promo. Balcarion from World Championships 2004, I think. Dragon Master Knight from Duel's pack, Kaiba. Blue Eyes Ultimate Dragon. Blue Eyes White Dragon from JMP. This is very nice. Sacred Phoenix of Nethus, ultra rare. This is the ultimate, be pretty insane. We've got the Perfectly Ultimate Great Moth. This starts as a young Bacchanium Moth and grows to be the Perfectly Ultimate Great Moth. Big Shield Gardner, this is from Dark Beating One. Actually, I think the first printing of this and then TP came out. Exodia the Forbidden One from DB1. Mazzara De Vil, first edition, Ancient Sanctuary. One of the cheapest raw secret rare from the first 11 sets, actually. It's not the cheapest, but it's close. Retropag One, Gay Guardian. I don't think I've ever actually held one of these, so that's actually sick. Next up, we've got Exodia the Right Arm. We've got Monster Reborn. Exodia the Right Arm, I wish that was the name. A Monster Reborn reprint versus an original. You can sort of see the difference there. If you don't know how to tell the difference, much lighter there versus this one. We've got Gaia the Fierce Knight.  We've got another reprint, another reprint, cool. Summon Skull, this is an original, not a reprint, very cool. Summon Skull, reprint. So there's an example of two side by side, much, much different coloring on that. Thousand Dragon, okay, very cool. This looks like an original. That also looks like an original. Okay, three originals, I think. Four, I think all those were originals. Beast Skull Dragon, Metal Raiders, and there's the reprint. Yeah, there's just such a huge difference. Let's keep going. Oh, whoa, Trihorn Dragon, is this wavy? Time out. So this is unlimited, but unlimited can still be wavy for LOB. Oh my goodness, rip. Oh my goodness, yeah, things destroyed. So this is an old Skull, but wow, that is in really bad shape. Okay, bad shape, but very nice looking. I still don't really know. Maybe it's wavy, it's hard to tell. Sometimes when they're more beat up, they're harder to tell if they're wavy. It's very dark, like a wavy card, but not all dark cards are wavy cards for LOB. All right, another Trihorn, it's a reprint, another reprint, another reprint. This is an original, that thing is in really bad shape. We've got a, okay, a first edition. That one looks like it has some edge wear. Let's check it out, first edition. All right, first edition Trihorn. This card is very beat up, okay. Gotta be mod play at the best. I mean, maybe even heavy play. Definitely not great shape on it, unfortunately, but pretty nice card though. All right, here's the Gold Letter Gaia, very cool. See that? Exodia reprint, Exodia original, cool, unlimited. Right leg of the Forbidden One, or right leg? Left arm, is that a band or is that a hair? Okay, is it just a hair or something? Left leg, left leg reprint, right arm reprint. Lot of Exodia limbs, very cool. Also want to shout out the Twitch stream we've been streaming every day on weekday, so if you guys are interested, go check out the link down below. Let's get back to the collection. First edition injection fairy lily, nice. First edition Luster Dragon, Paladin of White Dragon. Okay, these are kind of falling out a little bit. Got the Blue Wise White Dragon Unlimited. We've got Blue Wise White Dragon Unlimited, but this is original print, original print Dark Magician. Reprint Dark Magician, another original print. So these are three different looking Dark Magicians. But this is the reprint right here. Both of these are not reprints. So this one could be like 2003 print, which you could say it's a reprint the next year, but that's what I mean. By reprint, I mean 2010 through 2000 and whatever we're at now, 17, I guess, here's a darker print. This appears to be 2002. So this one also could be 2002, because sometimes they look like this even from 2002, but there's another reprint. Red Ozby Dragon reprint, another reprint. And then Trihorn, another reprint. So tons of reprints in here, but still great cards, even reprints. All right, Harpy's Pet Dragon. This is from Retro Pack 2, Secret Rare. This is a big card. Let's look at this. Whoa, this condition is pretty good. Okay, top, okay, lip right there on the top, unfortunately, back's pretty clean. Little bit of that going on there, but not too bad overall. A little bit of a corner issue as well. Very good condition, just has a lip at the top and a bad corner. So that can really hold a card back overall in condition, but still looks pretty good. Retro Pack 2, I've never actually had one of these. So pretty cool. Then we've got the Ginzo First Edition. Okay, Blue Eyes, Tune First Edition, Red Eyes. Ooh, Black Metal Dragon. This card got overhyped for a while. I remember this shot up like $2,000 or something in a 10, but still very cool. Here's the FMR. So here's all the FMR. Wait, that's only two of them. What's the other one? Oh, we had it earlier, the Metal Morph. Dark Magician Girl Unlimited MFC. Dark Magician Girl Unlimited MFC. First Edition, Dark Paladin. This has also gone down a little bit in price. Kings Knight, that's a apparently light play Ultimate Rare. Horus Level 6, very cool. The Legendary Fisherman First Edition. Yatta Grosso First Edition and another Injection Fairy-Live First Edition. So I think we hit the good stuff right now. Oh, and here's a big one. Ravi-L and Uriah, oh my goodness. Let's check these out. These are big. Ultimate Rare, First Edition. These are the guys. I've never even been able to pull these in Ultra, much less Ultimate. Oh my goodness. Little bit up there. You guys see that slight indent right there? Pretty nice condition. Back does have the indent, which is pretty normal for these. Let's just try not to even touch these as little as possible. I mean, these are not a perfect condition by any means, but definitely pretty nice overall. Seems like it's basically, I mean, light play at worst, but I mean, that's a solid light play if it is. So like, very light play, I would probably call it. I mean, really, really nice card. Then we gotta check this one out. Okay, and look over there. There's, you can't see it because my face is in the way probably in the editing, but there's the other one. All three of them are in this collection. Here we go. Okay, this one does not look as nice. Let's see. Well, it does look as nice, but I mean condition-wise. Like, hey, it looks as nice. Let's be honest. Uriah Lord of Searing Flames up there.  That happens pretty often with these. I don't have a lot of experience though with these. I have not really owned. I've owned one of these at one point. Back's definitely more scuffed on this one. Yeah, it's definitely scuffed there if you can see that. But it doesn't look like there's any bends for the most part. So this is probably, let's put it in a penny sleeve. You might be like, Penny sleeves are just good for not damaging the card at all. Like there's no way we're adding damage by putting it in a penny sleeve unless the corners are like literally falling off. That's the only possible way. So this card, I would say like, maybe like Mod Play or Weak Light Play, something like that. Somewhere in between there. Now for the final one, the Haman Lord of Striking Thunder. This is a pretty big card as well. Let's see what it is. This is the only one that was double sleeve for some reason. I don't know why. Let's see if it's in amazing condition. Little bit of whitening right there, but not too bad. I mean, a little bit of edge whitening is not the end of the world. Back surface? Okay, it does have scratching on it. Oh, does it have pendants? I can't tell through the foil. Wait, look at this. You guys can see that. You see those two dots right there? It looks like pendants. So it would be on that side. Let's see if we can find them. Yeah, I think I can see them right there. Very slightly. So they're not too bad, but pendants are pendants, unfortunately. I mean, with the whitening, the scratches and the pendants has got to be Mod Play, unfortunately. It's still a nice Mod Play though, but you can really see those pendants on the back, but still amazing looking card. Next up, another insane one. We have Elemental Herotipus. We got to go through all these condition-wise because this is just crazy. This might be a longer video if we do this on a lot of cards, but on a nice collection like this, we want to inspect the condition, of course. I will be doing afterwards as well, but I want to show you guys a lot of it. That's a slight, slight nick right there. Oh my goodness, the back is great on this. Compared to those last two Sacred Beasts, it looks incredible. Basically only that top part and a little bit on the back. Okay, two parts. See if we can see right there. Yeah, a little bit going on there, but not too much. This card's pretty nice. Okay, this is definitely in great condition. Like if you're gonna get super picky, like very lightly played because of those, but this is the kind of card where you just show the whole condition when you sell it and stuff like that, but incredible condition on this. Looks good. These are the kind of cards that are super hard to sell because like when people buy like near mint, they expect mint, you know, a lot of times. So like you have to condition it like that. I condition has very lightly played, even though honestly, I think it's probably near mint, like in realistically, but people that want near mint want it to be mint. So then if you sell it as near mint and they're like, well, it doesn't look as good. So, and then, okay, let's just get to what we're looking at here, Cyber and Dragon. Oh my gosh, man. I have not had one of these in a while. I owned one a long time ago before everything got crazy. This card looks so good. Okay, I mean, the back definitely is not perfect. It's got, you can see through it on the stamp a little bit. There's definitely some scuffing on it. This appears to be a European print. I could be wrong. The corner is definitely not very good there. I mean, it's pretty bad actually, but bad corner, some scuffs on the back. Like this is like maybe LP, something like that, but really, really, really, really nice card. All right, we're still going with cards that we need to like look at, like appreciate big time. Like even if they're not in perfect mint condition, you know, PSA 10, whatever, you got to look at this. You got to look at this. You got to appreciate it. Cyber Dragon, Ultimate Rare, first edition. We used to have a PSA 10 of this. It was an RIP thanks to the MFC box, bad decision, but that's okay. That's just how it goes. Little bit of like dirt on this one. I mean, that happens sometimes. Back's actually pretty clean. Okay, maybe a little bit of scratching in the middle there, but back's pretty clean for the most part.  So yeah, this is the kind where it's like the surface is not super clean, which is always not fun, but still a pretty nice looking card.  Pretty nice Cyber Dragon, Ultimate for sure. Oh boy. It's one of our favorites, the Cyber Dark Dragon. Yes, and we still do have our PSA 10 of this one because we pulled this card. All right, Cyber Dark Dragon, Ultimate Rare. Let's go. Woo, that's a nice one. Check that out. All right, that is such a beautiful Ultimate Rare. Back has definitely some scuffs on. I'm pretty significant scuffs. You can see them without even the light. Pretty nice though, besides that, that's like it. There's some scuffing on the back. That's about it. You gotta call that LP, but even this is like a very aesthetically pleasing LP. Like it just has the back. So if it's in a sleeve, looks incredible. All right, let's get back to these. Anything that we need to look at now. I mean, Water Dragon is a favorite of mine. I do like the look of it. We're not gonna pull it out. We got the, oh, there's the Sacred Phoenix. We gotta look at that. And then, oh my goodness, Dark Magician Girl first edition. We will be looking at these. Let's start off with the Sacred Phoenix. I don't even know, like, what card should we put in the thumbnail here? Like, I feel like I was gonna put the giant box, but I think putting a card in the thumbnail is just more enticing here. Oh no, it's bent. It's so bent. It's damaged. Rip. Okay, well, it looks beautiful on the front, but yeah, it's damaged, unfortunately. These are very bent top loaders too. Now the first edition, Dark Magician Girl. I actually am pretty sure I sold them this. I sold them a Dark Magician Girl like a year ago, but I don't know if this is the same one or not. It's kind of funny if it is. It made its way back to me. Let's see, I don't remember where I got this from in the first place. Must probably another collection, because I don't think I've ever bought a single of this before. Okay, Dark Magician Girl. MFC first edition. Ooh, that card's pretty clean. Okay, it does have some scuffing on the back. Yep, there it, oh, I remember this card. Specifically, because it has this scuffing. It's like this weird scuffing. But I mean, it's MFC. You know how it is, guys. The scuffing on MFC is just so bad. I mean, outside that scuffing, this card is insane. First edition, not near mid because of that scuffing, probably LP, but still incredible, great shape.  So you wouldn't know, but still nice. More stuff to go. So I think we hit like the biggest stuff just then, probably. Let's see what else there is. Tune Summon Skull, and we spent an adequate amount of time on it. It's good stuff. Spellbinding Circle, first edition, XYZ Dragon Cannon. We've got some more reprints here. Dark Medician of Chaos, the Black Lister Soldier. Maybe it has a wrinkle in it, or is that something? No, it's something. Another reprint. So we did sleeve off some of these. This might be a 2010 print. This one looks kind of like a 2010 print. They look a little bit different. You see this? It doesn't quite look like an original, but it looks different than the newer reprints that are super light. So there's a lot of different prints, okay, guys? All right, rest of the way. We have Gemini Elf original because there's no reprint of this. We've got a reprinted Genso. We've got an original unlimited Genso. Wait, is that reverse foil? Reverse foil, okay, very cool. This one's regular foil. That's a reprint. Yeah, reprints cannot be reverse foil, by the way. First Edition Legendary Fisherman, First Edition Legendary Fisherman, unlimited reprint, Bustableto reprint, Bustableto original, First Edition Fiend Megacyber, Goblin Attack Force, reprint ceasefire. Is this faded? A faded Dark Ruler Hades. That's really cool. Fiber Jar and a Megamorph, all right. Still a few more, actually quite a bit more. We've got a solemn judgment. That's original. What is this? Very, very nice card. Freed, Marauding Captain, Tyrant Dragon, Injection Fairy Lily. That one looks like it hasn't been to it. I can see it right there. Yamada Dragon. Yadagorasu has gotten very expensive recently off the ban list. Ring of Destruction, the Dawn Zulu. One of my favorite cards to play in Go Format. Very good. Lava Golem, Magic Cylinder, the original. Some of these might be reverse. I gotta keep an eye out. Mask of Strict, Last Warrior from another planet. You don't see unlimited elo in that much. Card of Safe Return, United We Stand and Dark Necrofear. There's another unlimited elo in, pretty cool. All right, Dark Paladin, First Edition. Is this Yu-Gi's World, I guess? Yeah, Slytherin of the Sky Dragon. Okay, here's some promos. These could be BCCG graded in the mystery boxes. Get your mystery gems now, guys. Oh wait, that's different. This is Yu-Gi's Legendary Dex. These are probably more valuable. Slytherin, Wing Dragon Aral, Obelisk. More Obelisk, a Beast Skull Reprint. Timers that are original unlimited. Timers that beat up original unlimited. Magic Jammer, Change of Heart also got expensive recently. Seven Tools of the Bandit, Mirror Force Unlimited, Mirror Force Reprint. Very cool. All right, Invader of Darkness. We've got the Strike Ninja, Strike Ninja. Leviah, the Sea Dragon, the Dark Mirror Force, Invader of Darkness, Dark Magician of Chaos from Yu-Gi's Legendary Dex. Okay, we've got another Dark Magician Girl and Dark Magician Girl Legendary Collection, Yu-Gi's World, two of those and a Dark Paladin, First Edition. Another one of those, all right. Well, those are actually pretty solid value. Then we're finishing up with a couple more stacks. Skull Archfiend of Lightning, Exodia Necros, First Edition, awesome. First Edition SDK, okay, you can tell from here that it is not great condition, but that's still SDK, First Edition is amazing. Thousand Eyes Restrict, Hell Palmer, Mirror Wall, Swift Guy at Genzo, Retro Bag 2, Dark Mirror Force, Guardian, Angel, Joan, Insight Princess, and Gemini Elf. All right, I think this is the last of it.  Like, we already appreciated the best stuff and the stuff you guys wanna see. We've got the Hell Palmer, Dark Magician of Chaos, First Edition. We gotta check that out. MST, Serpentine Dragon, First Edition, of course Relinquished. Okay, there's some good stuff to end this. Tune someone's skull. Time Wizard, First Edition. We've got a Barrel Dragon Faded, First Edition. That's amazing. And Vampire Lord, First Edition, Dark Crisis. Okay, that ended off pretty strong, okay? So this collection is absolutely amazing. I'm gonna have to double check for all the conditions and stuff like that, but we're spending $8,000, so hopefully it will be worth it. If you guys want any of this, just hit me up and let me know you're interested and I'll let you know if I still have it or if I'm selling it. And if you guys enjoy videos like this, make sure to subscribe to the channel for more epic videos. We also have another huge collection coming, by the way. Another $8,000, so see you then. Oh, I totally forgot to show you guys the graded cards. There's only a couple, and I took everything down, so I'm not setting everything back up. There's only two graded cards, and then one really cool glass card, Unlimited Gilgarde. So I'm gonna show you guys with a facecam. It's not gonna be great. This card's actually pretty rare. It's a Seeker Rare. As you guys know, Glass Seeker Rares are really, really tough to pull. There's a Valkyrium, the Magnet Warrior. This is PSA9 from Retroback 2. Very, very cool. And then here's the card, the Reason. Like, I wanna just skip those. I mean, they're both pretty cool. I'll just be like, whatever, they don't need to see them. You guys need to see this card. BGS9 Necrophase, first edition from Glass. So there's one of the rarest glass cards. We've tried to pull this many times. We've never pulled it. It's also a BGS9. It's also first edition. So yeah, I needed to show you guys that. Sorry for forgetting about that. I'll insert this right before the outro. And I'll see you guys next time. Shout out to TCG Trust, Cards, Stonefoil Show, Tomato Juice, Daxter JT Show, Clean Fitzgerald 87, Brett Palmer, Puffins Doom, Ernesto D'Anda, Stanley Mimegeko, Ian Moosa, Junior Barty, John Nolan, Anandatai Show, and Tom McLean. Thank you guys for supporting this channel. I'll see you guys next time. Peace.


QuickBooks Online 2023 entering data with bank fees while also using class tracking projects, location tracking, tags, sub customers, which used to be called jobs. Get ready to earn the skills needed to boost your bank books on up with QuickBooks Online 2023. Here we are in our QuickBooks Online test company file. We started up in a prior presentation using the accountant view as opposed to the business view. You can toggle between the two views by going to the cog up top and switch the view down below. Duplicating some tabs to put reports in. Right click in the tab up top to duplicate it. Right click in the tab up top to duplicate it. Back to the middle duplicated tab reports on the left side so we can open one of the faves, the balance sheet. As it's thinking tap into the right reports on the left and this time we want the P, the L, the profit, loss, the income, the...


Gold. Gold contract up $9.40 trading at 2052, you have silver up $0.07, $22.50 an ounce, light sweet crude up $0.72, $73.50 a barrel, notes and bonds, you get the 10-year note trading up 16 ticks at 111.09, that is yielding now 4.09, that will be right back under 4 tomorrow. So the high of the last three months in the 10-year folks has been 4.6, high, 3.7, low. The 30-year, 30-year up 20 ticks, 28 ticks that is, at 121 and $king dollar, $king dollar down 291 ticks at 101, 161, Euro 107, yen 147, British pound 125. Go over and take a look at the S&Ps, market wants higher price folks, okay, my take is that what you had out here yesterday, you had the rejection of lower price, you did it with lighter volume, you got another inside day out here today, bottom line, this thing wants to keep going up, why? Because here we go, it's going to be notes, bonds, the dollar, and what you have out here in the note and bond market is that you came back to strength, and this is the longer, you know, that strength was pretty incredible, okay, once it started, never hit the bottom of it, but came back to strength, had a huge contraction of volume, takes off top side once again, so now we're going to go back to the top of the consolidation, the top of the consolidation of course is going to get the 10-year back down to that 3.7, and we'll see whether it goes longer than that. We go into the dollar, the dollar is still the wild card here, okay, so what you have at the dollar is that it looked like it was going to go to the .618, didn't make it, we'll see how this shakes out tomorrow, it's been hanging tough, that's the real bottom line, it actually has been hanging tough, that being said, just missed it out here yesterday, and today it's dropping down again, so we'll see if that's it with the dollar, and if that's it with the dollar, meaning that the dollar is going to start selling off again, what you're going to end up seeing is that you're going to end up seeing higher markets, the correlations, you want to get this, you have yourself straight on these correlations because they're really cool and they verify each other. Have a great night folks, have a safe night, come back and visit Tommy tomorrow morning 9 o'clock, great show.