What's up everybody jason from jazzy's case breaks comm jazzy's 20 box luka basketball mixer random teams just sold out Where we're giving away luka optic purple 9-5 at the end of the break So again, this is a 30 spot break guys everybody gets a random team in the NBA Just remember no veteran common ship unless it is a LeBron Kobe. Yannis luka second year and it will ship But of course everything else ships autograph relics, you know rookies inserts numbered cards Short prints everything but veteran base besides those players right there in that in the item description And then at the end of the break will take all 30 customer names randomize them and the top name will get the luka projected a value a cost of over 1500 So they go and it's pretty strong guys Again, this is a pretty pricey mixer because of the boxes that are in here guys 1819 opulence box 1617 select hobby You have an 1819 20 optic choice mosaic fast break optic retail chronicles bunch of of course rack packs and fat packs in here hoops premium hybrid Hobby and then we got I think a little blaster box as well. We have a lot of different things in here guys That is pretty strong. So Let's get this rolling guys. Let's do the randomizer first I don't know my customer names and teams see who gets what membered hoops numbers one two three and four If your name is there with hoops one two three or four That means you want those in a filler and paid a fraction of the price and everybody else bought and straight up But good luck to everybody Roll and we got ourselves a four and four eight the hard way Good luck one two three four five six seven Eight eight times and knock down to Matthew Bloss four and a four eight times teams now one two three four five six seven and eight Charlotte Hornets down to the Phoenix Suns All right, there you go So we knock you have Hornets Lewis You have the Hawks Roy with the Thunder Kevin with the Wars David last by module Blazers Christopher with the Nuggets Matthew with the Knicks Jeremy with the Celtics Gretchen with the Kings Garrett with the 76ers Brad with the T-Wills Christopher with the Clippers Matthew with the Pistons Sean with the Pelicans as well as the Lakers Joseph with the Mavericks Roy with the Jazz Gretchen with the Wizards as well as the Bulls Christopher with the heat Gretchen with the nets Rich you have the Grizzlies Nancy with the Spurs Matthew S with the Rockets Matthew disbarred with the Pacers Matthew S with the Magic Sean with the Cavaliers Roy with the Raptors Christopher with the Milwaukee Bucks and Matthew Bloss with the Phoenix Suns Now remember guys we go way back all the way to like 2012 13 which has Kyrie Rookies Damian Lillard Kauai Leonard's Anthony Davis Jimmy Butler So remember it's a pretty strong mixer. Like I said goes dates back to that that far so You know, if you feel like you may have had a team that maybe doesn't have crazy rookies in 1819 1920 products Well, remember we still go back to 1617 we go back to 1718 and as far back as 2012-13 So some teams may not look good and In the most recent Years, but doesn't mean they don't have good rookies back in the day All right, anybody want to trade guys I'll give you guys a minute if I see some trade activity, then I'll give you guys a couple more minutes If not, I'm closing it. This isn't too crazy Matthew. You know, you got some second to boys At least for a lot of the 1920 stuff All right guys TWC trade winner closed All right, so we're gonna go with kind of the older stuff first and a lot of the heavy-based stuff like the hoops you know fat packs and backpacks and stuff like that One dollar off when you purchase both NBA hoops You guys want this code? That can target expires though 2013 This is just a little blaster version of the big rack packs. We're gonna be doing it now And again, this is 2012-13. So there's like a double year due to the lockout So Paris rookies here You know Anthony Davis, Kauai Leonard, Jimmy Butler Damian Lillard He even played Thompson is considered a rookie in 2012-13. I want to say and speaking of a rookie. There you go Damian Lillard right on the top of the first packer first the heart of the pack I just ripped So there you go Blazers What a nice little D. Lil rookie card already I had a Weber State David Lasbon Mocha Quincy AC As a Jimmy Butler, that's considered a rookie I believe as well Perry Jones Bernard James Julia Serving Alrighty, let's continue on with the The retail rack packs Again, we got 2012-13 we got 1920 hoops as a premium stock Sello and we got 1560 NBA hoops and then chronicles There's a whole rack pack Bradley Biel rookie for the Washington Wizards Norris Cole's also a rookie Jimmer Jimmer for that. Oh, there's a Kyrie Kyrie Tyler Zeller Bernard James And Austin Rivers is stuck right behind him D. Lil Their second littered rookie an autograph Reggie Jackson, which is actually a rookie as well Okay, see thunder. It's going to Roy. It's pretty strong That's it is a rookie in these Harrison Barnes Golden State Warriors Kevin Moe Harkas Jeremy land Myers Leonard Jason Terry spark plugs Harry Jones Michael K. Giltress for Charlotte Charlotte Bobcats go to Charlotte Hornets Thomas Robinson Got Tyler Zeller Andre drumming Troy Pistons That's all rookies right there guys. Oh, there's quite Leonard another Kyrie Irving played Thompson So getting all the good names there Norris Cole Deon waiters Clay Thompson I think I'd say Thomas is also a rookie in this Such a loaded class at least in the hobby, of course, you know These guys of course weren't rookies all the same year back in the day Jimmer for that Bradley Biel LeBron Harrison Barnes Anthony Davis draft night New Orleans Hornets, which would be going to the pelicans And when your lens goes in your lens Charlotte goes with Charlotte's D. Lil, that's our third one Even Chandler Parsons. I believe it's a rookie in this too Jimmy Butler Austin Rivers Anthony Davis nice we finally got one and 10 drops Busevich, he's a rookie in this too Tito Turcolu. Are you sure that was Busev? Did he start off with the heat the whole time? Was that he the Turcolu all right here. I don't know wonder why you like Busevich He was a sixer All right, you guys What happened? Did he get traded at him? Did he get traded? Wow, is he part of that package with Andrew Vynum? Alrighty guys. Well, just Tons of ton of good rookies here. All right, let's go. Let's get rid of some boxes. Let's go through some blasters We'll go with this one We'll go with this one After this we'll go to the hoops and chronicles boxes. Oh, did we get a green poster? Oh, no, it's just a green All right, good luck guys Isaiah Robi Green Saika Dumboya We got Will Barton Nicolo Malley, Jabara Parker Rui, Chris Dobbs Kendrick Nunn, Brandon Clark, what a hollow Kobe White and Dylan Windler Do they even have hats there in Lake Tahoe? They don't have hats Kobe Yanis, Jerry Culver, Pink, hometown heroes Brandon Clark, Cam Reddish, Cam Redish again, Ja Marentes, Steph Trey, Nakeel, Cameron Cameron, Ja Jerry Culver, Marquis, Pink Deandre, Zion Deandre, Zion Andrew Wiggins, Traded Luca, Deandre, Kelton Nakeel, Brandon Anthony Davis, Luca, Bron Rui Garland Perlman, T. Stival, Luca, Brandon Clark Jerry Culver and James Hardin, Marquis All right, let's do the Prism Blaster Jackson Hayes, Ray Allen Silver, Terrence Mann, Rookie McHill Alexander, Instant Impact We got a Rookie Bowl Bowl and a Jared Allen Relic We got Ben Simmons Green and a Fiondu Cabinelli Silver Prism Now, Willems Rookie, Cam Reddish Yeah, Rex, as I was telling people, they signed it almost 20 years ago We've done plenty of those boxes where there wasn't anything crazy but at least, you know, a nice dual autograph was pretty strong Something you were really expecting, right? All right, let's throw it back with some totally certified All right, that's going to go to the Lakers The other day, guys, I did a personal, actually, totally certified and there was a Kobe Relic out of 24 there That was the only the second relic I've ever seen in all these packs I've opened up and I've only seen two autographs and they were both out of 24 and pulled But even though the majority of the time there isn't any relics or autos in these packs there are some out there They're just extremely rare Monta Ellis You got Javel McGee Nuggets Mark Zawd just a $4.99 O.J. Mayo Relic Quincy Miller Yeah, Andrew Goudlock and Ricky Rowe called Chris Joseph Boston Bruins I mean, sorry, not Boston Bruins Boston, uh, Celtics I'm watching the outdoor game right now The Bruins just won Derek Fisher and Kyle O'Quinn for the magic Ricky Rowe call Jason Kidd and his canter Nice little patch there at a $49 Jeremy Lin and Quincy A.C. Ricky Rowe call Yeah All right, there you go Let's see this one for a while Let's do some of the older ones now There's still plenty of boxes but I think once we get done with the Chronicles NBA Hoops premium stock everything else will start flying off a little quicker All right, this is 15-16 Hoops 15-16 I think Porzingis is a Ricky here Devin Booker Sam Decker's there LeBron You got Aaron Brooks, $2.399 Terry Rosier Povey Karen Payne Povey Lorraine Grant He's going to actually be killing it lately to the Oklahoma Eri Bradley Nice Devin Booker Rookie Phoenix Sons with that one, Matthew Patrick Patterson Kristops Porzingis D'Angelo Russell Bradley Beal and a cat Nice, you're getting a good rookies but you're supposed to get an autograph out of here supposedly Pat Cunningham Montres Herald There you go, Trey Lows It's your great Hoops Significance Rookie Autographs Utah Jazz All right, it's got 1920 Chronicles Little fat packs All right, you guys Tally here with Rookie, D'Andre Hunter Carson Edwards Cam Reddish K.P.J. LeBron James Kendrick Nunn, D'Andre Hunter Luca Flux D'Andre John Morant There's Garland, John Moran again right here Suck it up Tally Hero RJ Barrett Zion Bronze Lulu Little Crusade P.J. Eric Pashaw Luca P.R.O.R. D'Andre Hunter Derek Holver Psycho Rookie Flux Cameron Johnson Trey Young Smarky Colver Coby White Yannis Calvin Johnson LeBron Paul George Update John Moran, Recon Reddish John Moran Rui Jackson Hayes Zion P.N. Stephen Todd LeBron Crusade P.J. Kendrick Nunn RJ Suck it up Tally Hero All kind of the same brookies all over again So there's a lot of value really Coby White, Brandon Clark Cam Reddish, Terence Davis Pashaw, RJ Luca K.P.J. RJ again Darius Trey Young Yannis Alexander Johnson Reddish Coby White Yannis Jordan Poole Coby White John Moran Ristaf Garland and Holver All righty, premium now It's the last pretty big like cello-packish type of fat pack product After that we've got all hobby retail stuff finished ripping the little lasers Reddish Rookie DeMar DeRozan Evia Sova John Moran Rookie K.P.J. Like Jack Beasel tribute Anthony Davis Tobias Harris Dirk Taco Rookie laser John Stockton Bulbul Kyrie Tribute R.J. Barrett That's a nice one J. McDaniels Coby White T.H.T and Psycho Dumboya laser Banzai All righty guys So Let's go on with that status team all. Let's do that one next actually All right Kyra Bowman Rookie John Moran new beginnings Very nice New beginnings on right behind us Reddish Davis LeBron Symbols Lulu LeBron upper echelon That's actually one of my favorite cards in here So much looks really sweet Steph Symbols Darius Baisley We got a numbered Lou Dort to 125 That's beautiful Very nice OKC Roy with that one Psycho Rookie John Wall Symbols All righty guys Continue on Well maybe 10 plus boxes left But done with the really really heavy based stuff So we got that Move on to these two next We'll go to here And I'll move on to some of the higher end More pricier boxes Everything here actually is probably At least over $400-$500 box And some of these are in the thousands already Optic retail All righty guys good luck Paolo Rajarondo Malcolm Brogdon Bull Bull Raider Rookie My House Zion Grant Williams Kyrie Purple Phantasy Stars Ken Basmore LeBron T-minus 321 Siaka My House And Khadim Allen Is your signature series autograph Isaiah Roby Chris Baisley Nice signature Westbrook My House Hollow PJ Washington All righty guys Let's go on with some mosaic fast break DHT The Andre Hunter Blue Chips Rui Disco Jordan Poole Jared Colver Tristan Thompson Cleveland 85 John Jones Jackson Hayes Ogianno Obi R.J. Barrett Terence Davis Tyler Hiro R.J. Barrett And a Kobe White Disco And a Nakeel Alexander Walker Autograph Fast Break And we piece of current Darren Fox Jackson Hayes Tom Taco Miles Bridges Cody Marden Jared Colver And a Rui Image Variation John Morant Kelly Albury Kobe White Terence Mann Rui Blue Chips and James Harden MVPs Blue Disco Kam Reddish Jordan Poole All of that later Let's continue on So mosaic, this time it's going to be a T-Mall Which has the gold and red waves Nikola Vusevich It's like a little pernene line right there on it Diallo So does this one have it as well Jason Tatum Will Chamberlain Gold Darius Garlin Usually you get two golds at least And a Zion Red Very nice There you go man Rui Tyger Rohn Horford Dominique Wilkins DeMar DeRosengold KBJ Brandon Ingram Alright you guys, let's go to Hoops Premium Hobby And we're going to end it off with the big stuff Opulence right there as well Emmanuel Moody and Nicholas Clarkston Tim Hardaway Jr Dee Lill Jackson Hayes We got a blue to 49 Jaylen Brunson Hunter Darius Basley Josh Akoji Dork Karma Lone Kyrie Irving And Andre Roverson Yeah, I feel like a little Didn't we have a big promo yesterday? I was feeling like everyone was just gassed out and This has already been an hour and a half long mixer Which is all good Alright you guys, good luck Last one, two, three, four, five, six boxes Keelah Gunner Walker, KPJ We got a Rui That's an image variation too as well Yanis Pashall LeBron Zion, there you go The center doesn't look bad at all actually KPJ Nice, this is a great box This is clearly Donneress Clearly It's clearly Donneress Rebel, come on Clearly this Alrighty, let's move it along Crown Royale, 17-18 Yeah, high tech, ice hockey It's kind of the same We got a couple of thick cards actually Beale, Steve Nash, Larenance Jr Derek Favors Nicole Nikola Jokic Deloni Ryan, Chris Middleton We got We got a Dwight Poil For Dallas Number to 99 We have Power in the Paint Which is Chuck Looks like an insert Could be like a short crime or something I haven't seen this one in a while We got Dennis Smith Jr It's a Jersey autograph Number to 199 And then we're going to end off with a little Dwayne Bacon All righty Let's go chronicles Then we'll go with choice after that Then select And we'll end it off with opulence This chronicle should have Some numbered cards and two autographs Hunter, Nicky Alexander Walker Yanis, Tyler Hiro RJ And a Lenny Wilkins Hall of Fame for the Blazers Number to 99 The first auto Portland with that one Jordan Poole Jared Colver Lulu Anthony Davis Matisse Diabolo to Blackbox to 249 Kendrick Nunn Kam Reddish Terence Davis Anthony Davis to 99 Marquis Blue There is Garland to 149 Yanis and Harry Witherspoon Apprentice, 4 out of 10 autograph Very nice with the spurs Derrick Colver LeBron We got PJ, number to 149 Number to 149 there Kobe White Silver Tyler Hiro Carson Edwards, Zion We got a Yanis to 149 Flux, Jamerant Number to 149, very nice Jackson Hayes and Darius Basin Alrighty, let's go Optic Choice We got DeMontes Sabonis We got Wendell Carter Jr We got Wendell Carter Jr We got Wendell Carter Jr That's a Red to be the 88 And we have a Redemption Wow, okay, the autograph is going to be a Redemption And Jaylen Noel Red and Green We got a Lucas Amonage No Name And DeAndre Hunter-Mojo DeAndre Hunter-Mojo Alright, let's see who this Redemption is Signature Series Choice Card number 49 Charles Barkley, very nice So again, let me double check that Chuck is not a 76er or a son or... Never know Actually, card number 49 Signature Series is Phoenix Suns Edition of Charles Barkley There you go So, Phoenix Suns Just to show you guys of course Phoenix Suns right there Alright you guys Two boxes left Two of the bigger ones So the 1617 has really jumped up, guys So luck Yonte Davis Silver Marquis Chris Red I had a 175 Montalus DeMigo Green Kyrie Irving Silver Yonez Valentinas Russell Westbrook Bloody Heel And wow, sort of a big back in the day 1617 Dica Gold Chris Dunn for the T-Wills Or actually is that yellow? Look at that gold Either way, Chris Dunn was pretty big at the time when he got drafted Mason Plumley Throwback Corey Joseph and Tarion Prince to $2.99 autograph for the Atlanta Hawks Over There for the Knicks Chris Dunn Silver Kelly Aubrey Alright, there you go, nothing too crazy in this box Yeah, this one was a little rough Joe Pizzle for Cheryl, man I've seen some really good boxes and then I've seen some boxes like this Alright, well let's make up for it with this opulence 1819 opulence, guys Last box in the mixer, guys and remember we're still going to give away this Alrighty, DeMar DeRozan out of 10, 8 out of 10 We have a Seronis Gilded Signatures for the Golden State Warriors Rick Berry Another one for the Warriors San Francisco Warriors going to the Golden State Warriors Although they're back in San Francisco We got DeMontez Sabonis Indiana Pacers, 1 out of 79 Haces going to Matthew We got Michael Bridges Phoenix Suns Redemption It's Mitchell Robinson New York Knicks Alright, two more guys We have Ray Allen Milwaukee Bucks Edition 42 out of 49 Christopher with the Bucks And last hit, guys It is a book And it is a Rookie Patch Autographs Opulence Memphis Nice, Triple J He should be back soon, I believe, right? Triple J 16 out of 25 for the Memphis Grizzlies Great player, Sexy got injured They could have made the playoffs last year in the bubble Nice patch right there Onbook Plate Alright, Memphis How are we going to Rich? And there you go, everybody That was The mixer It took about almost 2 hours Now we're in 50 minutes, guys Do a quick recap I just top loaded and pennied See all the bigger stuff Of course, you guys just seen what we just hit Right here, Ray Allen, Mitchell Robinson Bridges, Sabonis, Barry From the last box We just did Buddy Hill, Rudy, Chris Dunn Gold, Die Cook, Chris Dunn Charles Barkley Redemption out of Signature Series Choice Some Mojos Matisse Dible Black Box And then Davis numbered, Garland Quendara Williams been a 10 Some numbered cards here, Kobe White John Morant We had Lenny Wilkins It's a 99 You got Dennis Smith Jr Really, that's an image variation From Clearly Donners The Braun James Gold We got a Zion Dorts, Rookie, Bluechips John Morantz Some colors here out of Josef Fasbury, Kobe White We got Fasbury, Gautagrave, Nicky Alexander Walker Steph Curry, this is an image variation Of Rui A couple of gold waves here Including a Zion Red Wave Katie and Allen Basely, Purple Retail Nice, see one's here Inserts out of Team All Status Dork to 125 Devon Booker Rookie Porzingis Rookie, D'Angelo Russell Chronithony Towns, we got an autograph here Trey Liles A couple of relics here out of the old 2012-13 Totally certified A relic here We got a little Reddy Jackson And a couple of great rookies back in With Jamie Butler, D-Lil Bradley Beal, Kyrie Irving Austin Rivers Harrison Barnes, Drummond Kauai, Kyrie Clay, some Kobe's Isaiah Thomas Lucovich There's just so much that was Penny sleeved to be top loaded A lot of rookies, silvers, bass Inserts A lot of nice stuff, I got a top load A couple of relics here Appreciate it, now let's give away This Luga Donchich Which is rated 9-5 Everything was a 9-5, but the service a 9 Purple, rated rookie This thing is valued a little over 1500 bucks And good luck everybody, everybody has a shot Switch scenes We got the dice roll here Here's the original list of customer names I bought in Good luck guys, number one gets it Let's roll the dice And it is A one out of four Five times Five times Customer name at number one gets that lulu One, two Three Four And fifth and final time guys Good luck Five times Wow, Gretchen came in And I was about to say ma, I'm sorry Gretchen coming in at number two Wow, top two, Gretchen, there you go After five times That rarely ever happens, but there you go I could have had a mini heart attack saying Man, I could have got a number one and then Boom, coming in at number one So there you go, congratulations, did you get that lulu Added to your Break right here, so I appreciate it guys Jospiescasebreaks.com


All right. Good morning, separate traders. Welcome on back here this Thursday, October 13th. Shortly after 9 a.m. Eastern Time Welcome on back here for our morning meeting. Great to see all of us inside the live trading room, Phil, Grant, Leda, Mark, Andre, and all of us there live. And let me get that back up for all of us on social media, Facebook Live and YouTube. Oh, not the best market conditions here heading into the open, folks. We're gonna talk all about that here coming up here in just a moment. But hey, before the CPI report came out, let's talk about this lace stock, at least for right now. Because even if the markets continue to stagnate, drop off further heading into the open or after, that doesn't mean that every stock's kind of looked to drop off. So with that, lace ended up continuing its move. Or actually, I should rather say, push back up from the close yesterday, ended up making a nice push above the highs that we had back from Tuesday of this week. And with that, ended up making a huge pop. So ended up topping off early in pre market here right off of 438 had pulled back down right around the VWAP. It was kind of struggling around there at first, and now roughly off of four bucks here. So let me bring up level four, let me bring up book map here, at least on this to start. Then we're going to talk all about the S&P all about the CPI report that just came out here at 830. So the lace trade though, for right now, and you have an iceberg, not just at four bucks, but, you know, at 395 about 10,000 shares currently on the bid sitting there. So that could be a complimentary level going into the open, especially to a level like four bucks, like I said, next support below there.  So should have really smashed below 395 beyond the lookout. I mean, maybe this little top here, maybe, you know, prior resistance could potentially be support, roughly off of like 382-ish, but there's nothing there on the bid to exactly justify that. Right now, as I'm talking, look, what just popped up. Pretty interesting to see here at least about 18,000 plus shares currently on the bid right off the four level. So again, like we were just saying, four normally to anticipate an iceberg to show up at, and really after the market opened, I wasn't planning for that right now. So we'll take it. So, you know, 395 and four here on the lace trade as support, we're going to put this on our list either way. I mean, obviously the markets took a huge hit just a moment ago, folks, coming off the CPI report, the inflation data that came out. Let me let me do a little bit of this. I'm going to move around for right now. Just give me a quick second here, folks, we're going to flip the spy to a one minute chart. And I got to get that pre-market data enabled again. But, you know, as you could see, huge drop on the spy, the SMP, you know, all major indices at 830. So I'm going to read the headline out for you from 830, the CPI report month over month for September is 0.6%. The estimate was 0.5%. With that, the initial jobless claims report also came out. It was 228,000 versus 225,000 as the estimate. And the prior, if not month over month, perhaps year over year, 219,000. So, you know, initial jobless claims definitely increasing and higher than the estimates. There's a couple of other headlines out there, too.   If we get that sooner than later, I'm not trying to be perfect with that assumption. But I'm definitely more pessimistic about the open. I'm sure a lot of us here are, too. So, you know, I'm not really looking for a pop right away. But it is to say, though, that, hey, if the markets continue or if the markets fail to continue dropping, perhaps we could get that 1015, 1030 Eastern dead cap bounce reversal time, perhaps. But with that, though, I want to jump back to the S&P, not just the spy, but the S&P historical charts, because I thought this was pretty interesting. You know, folks, for all of us on inside the live trading room, at least, keep in mind, Fausto had mentioned this very briefly yesterday, just to give you a lot more data about it. We're going to be launching our swing trading program or swing trading course coming up in just about eight days from now. On October 21st, Friday, 12 p.m. Eastern time. So, we're going to make sure that the links are sent out just over the next few days, next week with that. If you have any interest in our swing trading course or program, just make sure that you talk to your Education Advisor. Live classes begin in eight days on October 21st. We're going to do them on Friday. So, the 21st, and then actually the 28th is the second class that we'll be conducting week over week there. So, I really look forward to teaching it with you, folks. But, you know, part of that is going over historical charting and going over really just, you know, indicators and basic charting that you could anticipate to act as a potential bounce level or support level. So, give me a quick moment. I actually have to probably go back even further. Just want to make sure. Let's go back like 75 years.  I mean, it did technically break a lower, but over time held back well and then squeezed back up essentially a double bottom of sorts, right? But with that, though, you know, hey, as far as seeing where we could find big support coming up on the spy, personally, me personally, I don't use indicators as often with my day trading. But when it comes to swing trading and having the time to prep and, you know, study and do research, you know, you have a lot more time to do that when it comes to swing trading. So, I'm going to toss up a couple of different fibs here just really briefly just to show historically, though, back from 2009, the bottom of 2009, their financial crisis 2008-2009. So, you could see at least for right now, the S&P is well below the 23.6% retracement here at this point. It wouldn't shock me to go as low or close to the 38.2, 3200, just about, I was going to say the spy, just about 320, that would be. But, you know, that's one to watch if I want to kind of move this up even a bit further, going back to the pandemic lows all the way up. Well, for right now, there is a level to watch here. It's not like there's just no room until that 3200. But it is to say like you're off the pandemic lows to the very high here, roughly speaking, right around, you know, 3483, 3485. I was looking at this up earlier on the spy. So, I'll show that to you folks right now. The spy is right around like 348, 349, that would essentially equate to. So, I would assume for right now, that to be a bit of a technical support. Now, does that mean that it's going to hold there perfectly? No, not at all. But as far as a day trade, as far as a potential intraday trade and a bounce that we could look to make money on throughout the course of this morning heading into the early afternoon, why not think that? So, that's roughly off of 348 here on the spy, 348, 349. You know, let me just jump back to my one minute here because it erases the pre-market data when I jump around to the indices. So, you could see right here, it's essentially there now, right? Dropped all the way down to 350, broke below there. It's gotten really close, if not a direct bounce so far. Pretty interesting, huh? So, that's what I'm keeping my eye on when it comes to the major indices, that being at least the S&P and the spy, the S&P ETF. So, that's what we're going to be following inside our live trading room. All right? So, you know, hey, normally I like to start these meetings off by going over the stocks we traded from yesterday, but obviously we're anticipating the CPI to come out from early this week. PPI came out yesterday. Markets didn't really do a whole lot from that point. I think, you know, they were really hesitating and waiting to see what happens heading into 8.30 this morning. So, with that, we're going to not really tend to find a whole lot on the gainer's side here. Probably just littered with ETFs, right? Like SOX, SQQQ. You know, the one that we, if anything, follow inside the live trading room because it does have good liquidity overall and well within our price range for right now, but the UVXY trade. So, UVXY definitely will put on our watch list here alongside the lease trade to begin. Just remember, though, these are all ETFs. Unless if you have bookmap level 4, I would not suggest for you to be following an ETF here this morning. You're going to have a lot easier of a time following an equity. Even if you can't short, I know that there's a few of us in IRA accounts or just straight up cash accounts and you can't look to short a stock here this morning. That's all right. That's totally okay, folks. Not only is it possible that the markets could dead cat down slightly later on today off that FIB level, but again, not every stock is going to tank with the market. Not every stock is going to go with the grain. You'll have a couple of stocks that go against like the lease trade, maybe a couple of others should we see them. I saw one earlier, but unfortunately it ended up tanking. It was the APDN stock from yesterday. Perhaps we'll talk about that one in just a moment. Metamaterials, MMAT is still up like 6 plus percent. It's just really flat here in pre. Not a whole lot happening on that right now. As assumed, not a whole lot left on the gainer side. We're below 5 percent. Let's hop over to loser's list right now. We'll go through some side list stocks like the cruise lines, airlines, casino stocks here at the tail end. Got this one stock RLMD down. It was down like 85 percent by the time I logged into the trading room early. For any stock that's down that much, I'm not looking to short it right out the gate if anything. I'm looking to try and look for that infamous dead cat down. This actually I want to show just on a 15 second chart. This was cool. I don't use a 15 second chart when I trade folks. Just want to point that out. I'm only doing this for educational purposes. But earlier today, frog my throat again, earlier today I started the trading room off with that. Earlier today we ended up seeing the RLMD trade. It broke under 5. Look how cool this is. Broke under 5, held under 5. As soon as it popped over 5, it ran. So that's where I talk about as far as anticipating support. You really truly want to see that support level get broken through first going down because if it breaks through it very shortly after going up, you're going with the momentum. At that point led to a really nice dead cat bounce early for this RLMD. It's still hanging in there too. Looking pretty strong right now coming off 9 o'clock. You're making move up to 7. So yeah, I mean hey for right now for as much down as this thing is. Let me just check the news on this. Not that it really matters at all. I mean it truly doesn't. It's down enough trading enough volume. So I'm just curious. That's all. RLMD shares trading lower after the company announced its reliance three study did not achieve its primary endpoint. So I don't know if it was like phase one, phase two. Oh, shoot. Oh, actually I do see it. Pardon me there. Phase three. There you go. So that's even worse. They were right at the goal line basically and on phase three, they ended up failing to meet primary endpoint. So a huge drop, probably a huge disappointment from investors as well.  But we know what's going to happen to a stock like this afterwards. When the volume dies off here, like when the volume bars begin to get smaller and smaller, this thing is going to tank. So you don't want to be on the receiving end of that ticket. So we're going to put this on our list. Hopefully it moves up more. Alright, let's see what else we got here. Alright, so another ETF here perhaps. But you know what? We'll follow this one given how volatile and how weak this sector has really been of late, but more volatile if anything. But you know, SOXL Semiconductor, the chip sector. So stocks like NVIDIA, AMD, Micron, Intel, you know, all of those trades are going to look to kind of be within the sector. So SOXL has been taking a huge hit of late, you know, more than anything with US China regulations with, you know, the super computer chips and all of that. With saying that, with saying that SOXL dropping down big here heading into the open. I don't know why I have a damn frog in my throat here. But AMD dropping off just as nicely. We'll put that on our watch list as well for Felix and Alex and a couple of us here perhaps otherwise inside our trading room that follow NVIDIA, obviously it's down like near 5%. So it's hard to not put this on our main watch list here, right? So like everything chip related SOXL, AMD, NVIDIA, at least those in particular, you know, I'm sure that, you know, if you do well on Micron or Intel, then you'll be more inclined to follow those as well. All right, let's see what else we got here, folks.  Last I ended up checking Bitcoin was at 183, 183 right now. And with the way the market's looking, it's like really breaking lower. Wouldn't shock me to see Bitcoin begin begin to get weaker compared to the major indices here. You know, they're very correlated, but not a direct 100% similarity. Sometimes the S&P will be stronger versus Bitcoin or crypto. And then sometimes crypto or Bitcoin will have its comeback or strength versus the major markets. I'm led to believe here, unless we see a giant slingshot otherwise altogether, which I'm doubting, but I'm led to believe that we're going to begin to see a lot of weakness in Bitcoin against the major indices here. So even if the markets stagnate for a little bit longer, I think that we're going to get more of a drop on Bitcoin. So be careful about that with that in mind. Coinbase down big, it's down over 9% looking great as a short. So we're going to put this on our main watch list right now. Let's see here, folks. See what else we got. Affirm down big. That's a stock we're pretty familiar with. Down over 8% on the way down to 18 looks like it's getting pretty close towards yearly lows too. Slowly but surely, perhaps all time lows you could say on top. So there we go, AFRM. Probably find a lot more folks on this losers list. So if there's anything else that's looking really good, down or perhaps even up, if there's anything making a big pop right now, let me know. I'll check Benzinga Pro here before we finish up. Michael asking, is there a charge for the classes for platinum and diamond students? I believe it will come with your course package, but just otherwise just for any one of us here, if you're interested in the swing trading course, please just do yourself a favor. Just email your Education Advisor, at least if not call them. Let's see. Ron saying D-WAC still up a dollar. I forgot about that. That's right. You know, everything going on with the CPI report. D-WAC was up early this morning, but you know, charts a little spotty here right now. I mean, hey, it's up, right? Seven plus percent. It's trading 271,000 shares. You know, it's tradable by all measures. I'll put this on our list. Hopefully, this can make a nice bounce. APDN tanked hard. It did. That was the one I was saying. Yeah, it was looking good early, but then right after the eight o'clock move, it bounced off three, couldn't hold that as support. And then from that point, I don't know if a common stock offering came out on this one, or direct offering of shares wouldn't shock me. Let's see. I don't have any news on this. So that's all right. Either way, I was just checking out of curiosity, but you know, it's tradable, but it's down big for a reason here today. There's a reason I tanked here early. So I'm not too interested in APDN just yet. Maybe later, if there's nothing else to trade, I'll give it a second look, but we'll pass. Delta dropping earnings today. Yeah, earnings today. But if the market's dropping off, there'll probably just be as good shorts, if not better at this point. So if the market had popped and Delta had good earnings, then I'd be a lot more interested in that later. But for right now, I'll pass. All right, folks, that might just about do it though. Hey, we're just about 12 minutes out until the market opens up in total. We got two, four, six, seven different stocks, two ETFs on top. I like to be particular about that. Because again, without using level four without using book map, it's going to be really difficult to trade in ETF folks, we do not suggest any of our students to trade in ETF unless if you have book map. All right. But with that, though, for all of a sudden social media, Facebook Live and YouTube Fausta will be will be back for you folks on Monday of next week. You got me for one more day and at least for this afternoon as well. Any questions that you folks have, feel more than free to send it over through email. Josh at c2trading.com is always my email address like posted there at the end of these streams. If you're interested in joining our live trading room, just go right down to the link on the blue banner below the stream right there to get yourself started. But for later, Ted, Bill, and Brian, and Ron, Simon, Michael and all that's just your life right now. I look forward to talking to you folks soon. I'm going to post the list. And for Bill, we're going to post the link for book map on D whack in just a moment. We'll do that in a bit ritual probably beyond that just now. Alright, folks, we'll talk to you soon. Take care.


I'm here at the research symposium with a wonderful group of students here talking about Netflix with a deep analysis in that. So tell me a little bit about your project, Matt. Yeah, so we kind of started with the Netflix analysis, looking at how they had their growth over kind of the international stage. We know Netflix is being the first company and kind of the first streaming service. And that's been an industry that's really exploded over the past five years. So we wanted to try and take a look back using that to be able to kind of create projections to move forward. So the first thing that we really looked at was going to be blocking out the revenue growth by subscribers and the amount of revenue that was generated by countries. So we found that the vast majority of the revenue and subscribers that we found were going to be in the U.S. and Canada. We kind of identified that as zone one to get an idea of how the growth really developed there. And then we were able to take a look at their growth since they became public back in 2001 when they were actually not even a streaming service yet. So we were able to track that whole progress looking at it through here where the growth as a streaming service really started around 2013. And we were able to see that there was a huge growth in the stock value through NASDAQ to get an idea of how much the industry really developed. We kind of used Netflix as a template to understand that. But then we kind of started to look more at the content debate and content competition that's developed with the new streaming services. So we wanted to start to take a look at what Netflix has been doing with their own content moderation and where they're producing the most content. So we kind of jumped down here where we've been tracking the amount of original releases that they had planned over each quarter, over a period of about four years or so. And one of the things that we noticed is that in comparison to the main competitors that we think of on the U.S. stage like Amazon Prime, HBO, Max, and Disney Plus, Netflix has always done more with the production of them. So they've always been like one of the top companies in terms of how much content they produce. But one thing that we started to notice is that this is actually becoming a little bit of a hindrance to them because especially with the news that's come out within the last week or so with the quarterly report, if we were to take the information that we got last week, we would have the value be about here. So it's a huge drop in such a short time. And we were kind of able to conclude that partially it was because of how much content they're producing here. This is a lot that they have to budget and allocate out. And for every 100 that they actually produce, maybe five or 10 actually are able to become big and grow in revenue. So we noticed that that became a bit of a damage hindrance to them. Yeah, really interesting. That's awesome, Matt. I'm curious why this project, you guys, Matt or team, is there anyone who wants to talk about why you chose to do this deep dive into the Netflix analysis? Yeah, I can take this one. So we tried to, this was like a self led semester long project. So we all kind of tried to pick something that was interesting and yet would provide enough data for us to really do like an in depth report. And originally we had thought about doing Netflix and every other like subscription service, but Netflix, they had the most data, but it was good to look a little bit at all of the different ones. But ultimately we focused on Netflix because it was the oldest, the best, maybe not the best now, but it was the best at the time when we started it. So we thought it would produce the most data. Sure, that makes sense. I was just going to add that the other side of it that we kind of looked at was the past few years with how COVID has really impacted what sort of companies really can thrive and succeed. And with Netflix and the streaming service being a predominantly online platform, they were one of the markets that was able to weather and grow with COVID. So that was where we kind of started our search. And that was really what helped us frame our mindset for going into this. Sure. So bringing it here today to the research symposium, why is it important for you to get out here and talk to your classmates in the Fairfield community about this project? So far, how has the day been going for you guys? So for the first part, I think it's important to really talk about because it gives everybody a perspective on the whole sides of the company with streaming services, like with Netflix, you often just think of like the final product with the content and with the idea of being able to give a whole picture about what their process was when we kind of broke that down and then kind of being able to create our own process with what we were able to find in research. We find it really important to make sure that we as students can ask the questions of like, okay, how did we reach this point with the company? Why are things the way they are? And I think the research symposium offers a real great opportunity for that. And so far, it's been great because we've had a lot of opportunities to talk both with peers and faculty that have even had more experiences with different researchers that have looked at Netflix before with us. So we've been able to even take a deeper dive and understand the larger picture that this could go into. Wonderful. That's wonderful.  Congratulations on all your hard work and thanks so much for chatting with us. Thanks very much.


तो, न्नेंक스를 औkus arti y LC वह चकेकिरताல कोकटer � Oscar बमत वह बічन में ंर्थ सीकОद वह चनें कर को menor छा fees of तने ऐसंप microbi नें OMG Li es आ�degreeिसीकोघ आस अख्都有 आध- खृ- Outmax She must not be picked and she must not be arrested and she must not be detained. That's not what anyone is saying. When you commit a crime, you must answer to your crime. But there is a law in Zambia, when you arrest someone, that person must not be in custody for more than 48 hours. But you have arrested this lady. This lady is no longer eating in the cell. This lady is not constipated. You can see that her tummy is swelling. Many people think that she is pregnant. Her tummy is swelling. Her baby is dying there in the copper belt. And you are still keeping this lady. What happened to the law? No one is saying what she did is good. What we are saying is even the greatest criminal deserve justice. Why not give her a police bond and let her go and take care of her child? Why not take her to court if you don't want to give her a bond? What crime did she commit? And who did she commit the crime against? Who is Mutale Manza, by the way?  To be controlling Zambian police. And when we talk, people say, how does this consign the president of Zambia? How does this consign Edgar Lungu? It consigns Edgar Lungu because Edgar Lungu has allowed the police service of Zambia to be controlled, to be run by prostitutes, slay queens and cadders. People who are sleeping with the bosses, people who are sleeping with people in the government and controlling the police service like is their kitchen. If not, how can Mutale Manza just wake up and pick up Serafina? And Serafina is dying in prison and nobody is doing anything. Who is she? Has she not committed crime against people before? She spoke something against Manacatu and Manacatu forgave? What is special about Mutale Manza? Are you guys this doubt that you cannot see anything? This is where it affect the president. If there was a strong president, if Edgar Lungu was really really serious, such a thing cannot happen to his own daughter, a citizen of Zambia. I learn how to languish in prison for insulting Mutale Manza. Who is Mutale Manza to be insulted? Wishy. Police service of Zambia is being controlled by true women's vagina. Women with their private path. That is how the government is being controlled. They give orders to police and tell police what to do because they are sleeping with the police. And we are looking at it and there are some other foolish people who are going to Mutale Manza and saying please forgive Sarafina. Forgive Sarafina for what? What did Sarafina do? If she reported Sarafina to the police, it's no longer in her jurisdiction to forgive Sarafina. The matter must go to court. Don't just go and start saying rubbish forgive Sarafina, forgive Sarafina, forgive Sarafina. No one is asking for forgiveness. What everyone is asking is justice for Sarafina. Let Sarafina be released and face Mutale Manza in the court. That's all. That's all. That's what everybody is crying for. No one is asking for forgiveness. Who is she to forgive people? Who is she? What does he have to forgive people? Why must she be worshipped? Why must she control the police and tell police what to do and when there is a president in Zambia? Why don't you release Sarafina to go and take care of her child that is dying there in the copper belt? Why are you so wicked? We are calling on the government of Zambia to release Sarafina with immediate effect. The case is between her and the Mutale Manza. Let them go to court and sort it out. Release the girl from the filthy prison. She is dying in the prison and everyone is quiet. What kind of thing is going on there?


So I'm here to share with you some work that we've done within OCLC Research and the OCLC Research Library Partnership to take a look at where institutions in the OCLC Research Library Partnership are on their trajectory with engaging with issues around equity, diversity, and inclusion. And just to frame this a little bit, OCLC Research is an organization that is really, we're a learning organization. We take information and we synthesize it and then we share it back out to the broad library community and also within OCLC. So we really see ourselves as learning along with the library community and on behalf of the library community. I am part of a group of folks within OCLC Research that works with the OCLC Research Library Partnership. I know that several of you in the room are affiliated with RLP institutions. And we're a transnational group that creates a network of peers that work on common issues together and that can engage directly with OCLC Research and with OCLC more broadly. I did manage to get Australia on my slide here. 70% of our partners are in North America, but 30% are not. So it does, the transnational thing is, it's a real thing and it's a real, it's both a challenge and an honor to work with a group of institutions that is so transnational in nature. As a learning organization, we are trying to ourselves as library professionals come up to speed on issues that are important to our community and equity diversity and inclusion is such an area that is of broad concern I would say to many, if not all of the institutions that are in the OCLC Research Library Partnership. And as part of our effort to get ourselves educated and also to share learnings with the broad community, we have tried to incorporate equity, diversity and inclusion into a broad range of programming. So not just the survey, but also we have a series, this OCLC Distinguished Seminar Series which we host internal to OCLC but also webcast out and under the leadership of my colleague, Rachel Frick who's the executive director of the OCLC Research Library Partnership. We've really steered the Distinguished Seminar Series to look at issues around equity, diversity and inclusion and our last three speakers have focused on those issues. So I urge you, these are really high quality, great talks, they're available online on our website and I urge you to check them out. This survey itself was carried out by my colleague Karen Smith-Yoshimura. Many of you know her, she does terrific work. It was conducted between September and October of last year and was issued within the OCLC Research Library Partnership. The full results of the EDI survey and all of our other work that relates to EDI is available at oc.lc slash edi. I hope you don't gallop off there right away but just bookmark that for the future and I'll share that again at the end of the presentation. So in doing the survey and doing this work we've really consulted with and relied on the definitions in the American Library Association's statement on equity, diversity and inclusion and are using their definitions for equity, diversity and inclusion which are allied but a little bit different and many institutions will frame these as EDI or diversity initiatives or inclusion initiatives but oftentimes these have a really kind of a social justice tie to what the institution is doing and it also, Mr. Keating's remarks today I think really resonated with me. We all aspire to have libraries be open and as open and inclusive as possible and I think that what looking at equity, diversity and inclusion allows us to do is to remain curious about how as open as we intend to be it gives us an opportunity to reflect on are we being as inclusive and welcoming to everybody in our communities? Do our workforces look inclusive? Do our collections reflect the communities that we serve? Do our services feel welcoming to everybody? So there's really a broad variety of ways that EDI can express itself and that's something that we definitely saw in the survey. So we issued this as I said between September and October of 2017 and really used this opportunity to get a snapshot of EDI activities within the OCLC partnership that could guide us in identifying specific follow-up activities but would also give us an opportunity to share out broadly what this group of institutions were doing. So we sent the survey out to the partner representatives at each institution. We have one partner up because we wanted one response for each institution. Here's the breakdown by institution. I wanna say that Canada, although there was only three responses, that's a 75% response rate so go Canada. Australia, there's eight in Australia so Australia did even better, go Australia. So we should have had percentages by representation there. So we asked, there were two questions that everybody was required to answer. One was, do you have a group in the library that's actively looking at or working on EDI issues? And 72% either do have one or are planning on having one. So this is pretty well integrated within library services. And then we also asked how many people were using EDI principles to inform practices and that was 79%. So pretty high, lots of libraries are in fact doing this of those who responded to the survey. Here is a slide that you can't read at all but I'm gonna tell you the parts of it that are important. In terms of, we asked in 12 different areas we asked where they have changed practices or where they are planning to change practices due to their institutions, EDIs, goals and principles. So the top three areas that have changed are in activities and events, recruitment and retention for the library workforce and outreach to marginalized communities. Collection building was fourth with 73% of people indicating that that was important. The top three areas where people intend to plan but haven't yet, so 70% or more, are search and discovery interfaces and metadata descriptions in library catalogs. Slightly more have changed metadata descriptions in archival collections than planned to. So that kind of distinction between changing things that are in the regular catalog versus archival collections. There's been more activity in things that relate to unique and distinctive collections. So to put this into a form that you can read, here are the things that people have already changed and they're ranked. And then here are practices and service areas where people plan to make changes and spaces is something that people both have made progress in and plan to make progress in. So now I'm gonna walk through just some examples from the survey and it'll show kind of the wide variety of ways in which EDI work is playing out in research libraries as represented in the research library partnership. So Duke University is an example of one of those that has a very active, they primarily see their form of engagement as through this Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Council or DIVEN, which surfaces issues that need attention. They said that things that the DIVEN group has done is to run an ongoing event series to address accessibility issues for websites and other systems that are within the library's purview and to also implement a gender neutral bathroom policy across the libraries. At Texas A&M, they are an example of an institution that is making changes in the workforce and they have a three-year diversity residency for minority librarians who want to work in academic libraries. This is something that we see as a growing thing within the United States as these three-year diversity residencies. In at Monash University, this is an example of an institution that's looking very closely at their spaces. They, the library works to highlight indigenous places in the university including indigenous art within the library. So that recognition of space and place. Brandeis University is looking at the community that they're embedded in in Boston and looking at how they are embedded within the community that they serve and increasing documentation related to students of color and looking at weaving those collections, that documentation into learning student light and activism with the library at the center of that work. LSE here has worked on, is leveraging existing collections. So organizing and promoting public events related to their extensive LGBT collections. And this is just a word here. I use publicly available because I want to be able to share my content. I use these things from Wikimedia Commons. So you should all go out and look online and see what your library looks like on Wikimedia Commons. Because I get a lot of these. Sometimes I can find great images, sometimes I can. At Brigham Young University, curators are working with marginalized communities. Again, that are reflected in their surrounding community to acquire materials for collections, including Hispanics and Native Americans. So here, looking at acquiring new materials and building up collections to look like the community that they're situated in and also the students that they're seeing on campus. Ohio State University, again, building collections in particular areas. Middle Eastern, African American, Latin American comic artists to relate to the cartoon museum. African American theater, LGBT, Native American primary sources, et cetera. At Princeton University, they are using their EDI initiatives not only for the library to help serve as a source of historical reconciliation within the community and acknowledging Princeton's relationship to enslaved peoples, but also to connect the library with the historical society of Princeton and to the public library. So this is using EDI as an opportunity to engage with other community partners. And they have this website and symposium series and also public lectures that are throughout the entire community. So not just on campus, but also within the community. The University of Delaware is likewise working with the African American community and other collaborative partners to preserve and collect oral histories and digitize personal photos and materials. So connecting with communities and also building collections and trying to do so in a sensitive and respectful and inclusive manner that where you're not just kind of remotely documenting of people but doing it in collaboration with those people. Language is really important and here I don't know why I don't have a label. There it is. Language is really important at La Trobe University. They work to change the salutation in their library system to identify people by the salutation that they feel most appropriately matches their gender preference. So Mr., Ms. and Mix to be, yeah. So labeling and language really matters and this may seem like a small thing but I wanted to call it out as a particular effort. Library of Congress is working with Native American nations to appropriately label their digitized collections. So again, working with a community and that those issues around naming and labeling and trying to do that in a respectful and inclusive manner. University of Manitoba, as Jonathan pointed out there's this really remarkable work that's going on that is in conjunction with the truth and reconciliation work that's going on in Canada. University of Manitoba and other institutions are working with indigenous communities to incorporate appropriate subject headings in archival and library print and digitized collections. And this is a really, it's a very complicated issue because the language that we have traditionally used in library subject headings is damaging to the communities that were and they're the artifacts that are in the collections that are describing them. So this was a really a wonderful example and we highlighted it in a Works in Progress webinar where we highlighted work that was being done both by the Association for Manitoba Archives and the University of Alberta Libraries and they talked about their work to, as I said, accurately, appropriately and respectfully represent indigenous peoples in context and subject terminologies. And it's not just a matter of flipping a switch and changing the subject terminologies, it really is a complicated process and needs to be done thoughtfully and in conjunction with the community. This is one of our, within the OCLC Research Library partnership we have these Works in Progress webinars and this was one of our both most highly attended webinars and most highly viewed after the fact so that again indicates a high interest in this type of work. And I know that this is not the only institution that's grappling with how to make these changes and adjustments. Another very highly attended and also watched after the fact webinar was one that was put on by MIT Libraries talking about their collections directorate and how they have looked at how they can take EDI principles all the way down to the ground through all of their processes and even looking at the types of systems that they acquire as being an EDI. And again, they really take a social justice sort of framework in looking at their work in librarianship, how they're serving their community and how they can more respectfully and inclusively serve a research community. So I encourage you for both of these webinars, there's links to them if you go to that oc.lc slash edi, you'll find links to these webinars and all of the other talks that I've highlighted here today. So the biggest institutional challenges, there were some recurring themes in what were the challenges that people face. One is building relationships with marginalized communities. And that is, as Jonathan said, this is long-term work and work, especially when you're dealing with communities that need reparations, it's a process and you need to be in it for the long haul and to build trust. Recruiting staff that reflect the demographics that we would like is also challenging as well as recruiting people, retaining people that have been recruited through those efforts. Developing more inclusive organizational structures and building a shared understanding of what's meant by diversity, inclusion, social justice, creating a positive work climate where people don't feel excluded by these terms and feel like they're really for somebody else, kind of making the case that this is really, we're all stronger together. Having work centered around specific initiatives can be a real challenge. So kind of the edi work is somebody else's job or it's going on over there rather than having it be understood as a shared value that is implemented and understood by everybody and creating a positive climate and understand that you're gonna have conflicts within when you're dealing with difficult issues and so striving to keep things positive and to help address conflicts as they come up. And of course this takes time, resources, funding so recognizing that rather than kind of giving it a little bit of time and attention, recognizing that it's gonna take time, attention and funding. So the people who said that they didn't have something within the library, what about those institutions? So that was 28% of institutions said that they were not. So in many cases, they saw the edi initiatives were something that was going on at the institution more broadly, not necessarily within the library but not, they didn't feel like they needed to be strategically driven at the library because that was happening at a higher level or there's the pool of applicants was called out. The university already has established programs and the library participates in those. Everybody has to participate in awareness training so we're covered, that was one. Our university just does this as part of our business and we aspire to an inclusive approach to all that we do so we don't have this as a specific thing. So that is what I have to share with you today. Again, you can find out more about our work. There's much, much more details about the survey and you can dig into details there and see our videos and ask us questions. Thanks.


Yeah, it's time for interactive follow us on Twitter at sports max zone for Instagram and YouTube or handless sports max TV live Watch like comment and share and we'll react to your questions and comments during the show It's time to see the nominations for this week's sports max class moment Dixon Arroyo Yedlin coming forward Arroyo will take it himself Ball recycles great run from Yedlin that pulls Wiley away Step into it great hit has the goalkeeper beat. How is that for a touch over Miles Robinson? Turn the world around you a hectic moment How's that for two touches with mine is a different time of the cricket ball 18 for nine The rest really might even have been in edge. I'm not too sure You know the face of the but Really good timing from say Mario the team. That's for sure. Well, yeah There's brown trying to leave for the front himself inside the box brown problems on the right-hand side For the duration of the second half so far Look at this Camping on defenders thought it was a heavy touch all those rosy parts Good intuition as well by brown and then the topo past class Certainly was beat for him to deal to the good Lance Whitaker, this is by far the hardest week in a long long time Those were three as far as I'm concerned genuine the class moments Yes, when you think about the word class you look at any of those moments and you see absolute class And now we have the toughest decision. We've had to make in a long time. So Lance. I'll allow you to go first Well, I think about it first. Let me just register that I agree with you 100% that all three are winners Yes, you know on on a on a different day. They each could have won on their own merit It's gonna be hard for me to deny Kampana the first goal from the into my Mami You know that was well the shot the rocket of a shot that crashed onto the bar by itself was a thunderous strike, but the Composure and confidence and style of Kampana's finish. I would I would just give that the edge, but it was it's a close call You know, I mean there were two defenders in his vicinity As the rebound came to him here. Oh That looks superb I give that the edge Ricardo. I give that the edge, but it's close. Yeah, that looks classy That really does look classy and most in the Miami class moments now come from messy Yeah, and this one comes from Leonardo Campana. Yeah, I'm going to go with Kelvin Bronzo. Yeah, the the the Kingston College player Beating I think two three players having picked the ball up Yeah, and then the finish as well that the finish for me is where the real class is because at that level Especially at the high school level when he gets into that position you're almost expecting him to Go for power and that little chip away from the goalkeeper in my opinion is oh, that's just real classy And I don't think the goalkeeper expected that either So beat a number of defenders and then outsmarted the goalkeeper in my opinion Yeah, and I'm not sure if he's Adept at using his left foot because there must have been a temptation for him to strike that ball left-footed But the ball was running across him and maybe if he had waited the defender advancing would have cut things off So that triggered his decision to just kick quickly with the right boot, which to me was very very good thinking So on that score, I agree that he gets some extra marks for that And by the way that six was a genuinely classy shot as well from Iowa. Yeah That's real class. That's not an easy shot to play. It looks easy Ricardo We said it this that it was difficult to choose between the three because that was just a wrist Yeah, that was just a wrist and the ball flew to the midweek at boundaries. So Yeah, we see it a lot from yeah Asian batsmen. Yeah, and and this Pakistan. I mean just just fantastic shot in my opinion Yeah, well, we do have a fourth-class moment to present Ricardo You do yes, and and it has to do with the appearance of one Monique Williams Who will present a birthday cake to you because your birthday is Sunday, which which is not a day that the sportsmax zone is on and I Think you should feel really honored that this lovely young lady is presenting this delicious looking Well, first of all, right first of all, there's no need to look at the cake. Can I get a hug? Oh Thank you so much No, no, you could not have brought a better person to present Where's she going? Isn't she going to cut and feed me like Mariah did for Lance? Or do we wait until Sunday?  I'm not a big sign guy, you know I am I am September. I am a lover of life. Yes. I am life wherever I am And you know what I I'm planning to do on Sunday Lance tell me I probably shouldn't say this But I'm currently playing a tennis tournament It was supposed to end on Saturday, which was tomorrow because of the weather It's been pushed back to Sunday. The finish has been pushed back to Sunday. I'm in two semifinals mixed doubles with the great Brigitte Foster Hilton world champion 100 hurdles in 2009 and Singles and I have both semi-finals tomorrow Yes, and I hope I'll be in both finals and have both trophies on Sunday. Okay. Well, we'll see what happens there I'm enjoy your day Sunday chapel. I hope I hope that the net the tennis goes well for you as well We've got a run because coming up now qualifier two of the Republic Bank CPL the Talawat's taking on the Amazon Warriors who will win the winner goes through to the final Sunday against Eka We'll see you Monday


But hello and welcome to this session in which we will discuss the concept of internal control when it comes to consolidated financial statements. Here's what we know. If one company exercise control over another company, then you consolidate the financial statements and the process is called financial statement consolidation. Now, when do you have control? Well, when you own more than 50% of the other company stocks, if you own more than 50% specifically of their voting stock, then you have some sort of a control. Now, how is that control? How does it manifest itself? Well, if you have more than 50% of their voting stock, you can tell the company what to do because you control the largest blocks of votes. It means here you have control and specifically you have direct control. So you own 50% more than 50%. Let me show you this in a picture. You have a parent company or a company that owns 60% of another company. Well, if you own more than 60% of the subsidiary, you control that subsidiary. This is called direct control. Pretty straightforward. You have more than 50%. Then the sub will have to consolidate their financial statements with the parent company. Now, the parent company could have control for more than one subsidiary. So they can control 78% of sub A and 85% of sub B. Well, basically, A and B will have to be consolidated with A. Basically, A controls both of them. This again, this is called direct control. Pretty straightforward. You can clearly see it if you own more than 50%. How about when we have indirect control? Before we proceed any further, I have a public announcement about my company, farhatlectures.com. Farhat accounting lectures is a supplemental educational tool that's going to help you with your CPA exam preparation, as well as your accounting courses. My CPA material is aligned with your CPA review course such as Becker, Roger, Wiley, Gleam, Myles. My accounting courses are aligned with your accounting courses broken down by chapter and topics. My resources consist of lectures, multiple choice questions, true-false questions, as well as exercises. Go ahead, start your free trial today. No obligation, no credit card required. Well, what is indirect control? Well, think of when one company owned by one or more other companies that under the common control of one company. Think of a pyramid. This is what indirect control looks like. So let me show you in a picture what it looks like. So you have a parent company that owns 55% of sub A. Well, if you own more than 50%, you control sub A. It means A will have to be consolidated with B because B is in control. Pretty straightforward. Now, what happened if A also sub A controls 60% of sub B? Well, guess what? Now, the parent company can do what? The parent company controls A and since they control A, they can tell A what to do. And A can tell B what to do because A controls 60% of B. So in reality, A controls B indirectly. They don't own any shares in B directly, but they own shares in A, which controls B. In the real world, if you think about it, I'm sure you heard of Google, right? So Google owns Alphabet. So Google is here. So Alphabet is here. Alphabet controls Google. Then Google controls YouTube. Most likely you might be watching this on some sort of a video, YouTube. So Alphabet controls YouTube through Google. So this is basically how it works. Another way of saying this is we have a grandson, which is YouTube is the grandson. Father, we have a father and grandfather. So we have a grandfather, son, grandson relationship. This is what we have here. Grandfather, son, grandson relationship. Now, this indirect control could take place in many different ways. Let me show you another format of it. We have a parent company that owns 62% of sub A. They control sub A. They also control 70% of sub B. They control sub B. Now, sub B owns 35% and sub C. Now, sub B doesn't control sub C because they own only 35%. But here's what happened. Also, sub A owns 20% of sub C. Also, they don't control sub C. They basically A and B use equity method when they account for C. However, if we look at the parent company here, the parent company can tell A what to do because they control A. They can tell B what to do. They control B. Now, A, they only have 20% power over C. Well, they cannot tell C what to do. But the parent company, they also control B, which own 35% of C. Well, if you think of it, the parent company can tell A and B what to do. And A and B put together will represent 55% of the stock of C. Simply put, the parent company controls C. So notice how the control is here. It's basically two layer. Now, we could have other sources of control. I'll show you one later on. But the point is you have to consolidate when you have control. Now, you do not consolidate if the sub is in bankruptcy. Why? Because if the sub is in bankruptcy, the owners of the company don't have control. The court would assign either a judge or a trustee to run the company. Therefore, you don't consolidate. Or if the subsidiary under the control of a foreign country, for example, they operate in a foreign country, in a foreign country, tell them what to do or what not to do it specifically. For example, they cannot take the cash out of that country because it's controlled by that country. Then you cannot consolidate. Also, we could have consolidation issues when there are different physical period might complicate the process between the sub and the parent company. Usually in the real world, when that happened, the sub will basically change their physical to match the parent, whether the parent is a physical or a calendar. That's what could happen. Or the sub will have two physical period, one to consolidate with the parent and one for themselves. Again, the process gets complicated. Now, bear in mind, if you don't consolidate, what you have is a single line investment in the company. So if you don't consolidate for one reason or another, basically the sub becomes an investment for you. Now, let me show you another indirect control. Basically, we have a parent company and they control, let's assume of A, they control 70% of A. Well, they control A. A controls B and let's assume A controls 60% of V. Now, the parent don't control B directly, but they control it, they control it indirectly. Now we have C and we have sub E. Now, if let's assume B owns 15% of C. Well, the parent has control of V, but B does not have any control of C. Therefore, the parent doesn't have control of C. Now let's assume A controls 25% of C. Well, although A controls 25% of C, we control A, we control B. Together, they only give us 40%, so the parents still don't control C. Let's assume we have another subsidiary, E, and we own 80% of E. Now, E owns a small percentage of C, 12%. Now, here's what happened. The parent company controls B, the parent company controls A, the parent company controls E, and B, A, and E, they all have some sort of an ownership in C, 15, 25, which will make it 40 plus 12 equal to 52%. At this point, the parent company will control C. Now, why am I showing you this? The point I'm trying to make here is this. Indirect control gets very complicated, many layers, and this is what happened when the people wants to basically, companies wants to hide money, hide relationship, that's what they do. They build those relationships where one company controls the other, the other one controls the other, so on and so forth. This is still very simple structure. The point is it gets very, very complicated in the real world. Let's take a look at this multiple choice question. P owns 53% of X and 70% of Y, so we have P, we have X, and we have Y. So we own 53% of X, 70% of Y. Do we own X? Do we control X? Yes. Do we control Y? Yes. If X and Y jointly own 100% of Z, so X and Y, you know, I don't know, it could be 50, 50, 60, 40, it doesn't matter, but they both control, they have control of Z. Under what circumstances would P would not be deemed in control of Z? So right now, is it in control of Z? And the answer is yes, because P can control X, P can control Y, and X and Y control Z, therefore P controls Z. But is there a circumstances where P does not control Z? Well, let's take a look at the answer choices. Z is an insurance company. We're not told anything about whether it's an insurance company or not. Z is in chapter 11 bankruptcy. Well, if Z in a bankruptcy, chapter 11, guess what? Someone else controls the, some judge or a trustee is signed by a court. So B is a good answer. P is not in control of Z. No, P is in control of Z from a controlled perspective, in control perspective, but it's not in control Y. That's what we're kind of, I'm telling you it's not in control, but Y. So basically C is not an answer because I already told you it's not in control, just made up this answer. The CEO of Z was a former executive of P. It doesn't matter. Even if they were a former executive, there's no such thing as related party cannot consolidate or anything like that. So the answer is, if Z is in chapter 11 bankruptcy, then what happened under those circumstances, the owners of Z, basically they lost control. The owners means X and Y lost control because now the judge or the trustee is in charge of their liquidation. Therefore they're not in control of the company. Therefore P is not in control of the company because they are in chapter 11 bankruptcy. What should you do now? Go to Farhat Lectures, look at additional resources that's going to help you with your advanced accounting, CPA exam preparation, whatever you are preparing for. Good luck, study hard, and of course stay safe.


Hello everybody, E here. Welcome back to 31 Days of Halloween. It is Classics week, and I have finally finished Dracula by Bram Stoker. I've been trying to read this book since I was about 10 or 12 somewhere between there when I really got into reading adult fiction, and I never never made it, but I finally did. I bought this edition especially because I was going to read it along with Brad Proctor, and he did that I think in February, and it's now, well I read this in September, but it's now October and I'm just now getting around to my review, and it took me months to even start the book. But anyways, I finally finished it, so here are my thoughts. The middle of the book is an absolute slog. There's a lot of Victorian romance and all of them kinds of stuff going on in there that I didn't care anything about. Oddly enough, it reminded me a little bit, just a tidbit of 112263 by Stephen King, where there's this whole middle chunk that I absolutely hated, but I loved everything that it's bookended by. Now, saying that, I am still giving it three stars, and here's why. I have seen the Francis Ford Coppola adaptation, Bram Stoker's Dracula, and I remember laughing at certain scenes that I still to this day find funny, like Dracula scampering up the wall. It was shot in such a jerky way that it just looked goofy to me. In the book, it's absolutely horrifying. I knew the scene from the movie, but it is so much better done in the book than it is in the movie. But the main reason I'm giving it three stars, three stars alone, actually five stars, but since I didn't dislike the last bit of the book, I'm cutting it down to most of the book.  Most of the book was a chore to read, but I'm gonna cut it back down to three because of the demeanor scene. When the demeanor arrives, when it comes to shore, the descriptions of the crew, the descriptions of the boat itself, everything was so well done. I could have done with just that scene alone being by itself. As a short horror story, it would have been very effective. Now, I'm not a fan of vampire literature period. It's the most overdone horror trope I feel. If you love it, you do you. No judgment whatsoever. But I don't like vampires. It's also, it's the not to deus ex machia, but it's always solved with some kind of religious iconography, whether it be a cross or whatever. They can hold them back that way. It feels using that as the end all for damn near everything that's classic horror is like, oh, every monster is afraid of God. Of course, it's the Christian God and none of the other ones. But uh, anywho, this, that that demeanor scene, and I hear that they are making an entire movie based solely on the voyage of the demeanor. That I am all signed up for. I am looking forward to that. I did like things about the wolf. That was kind of cool. Him turning into a bat will always be goofy to me because I'll always think about the classic Dracula movie with the with the bad special effects, which is funny because when I think of the Bramstone when I think of Coppola's movie, I think of that goofy wall climbing scene. But in the book, I like it so much better. I am glad this one exists. Same thing that I said. Well, I'm not sure which order I'm putting these in. This might be the first one of the week. But I said the same thing about Sleepy Hollow. I'm glad that it exists. I'm glad that it's out there. I'm glad so many people have found a way to repurpose this monster, this character, this trope. And I'm glad so many people love it. So I'm giving it three stars for that also. Did I enjoy the book? No, not really. Like I said, most of it was a chore, but it had two absolutely brilliant scenes. And that is the Dracula on the wall and the demeanor scene. But have you read Dracula? If you haven't, I'd like to hear from you if you haven't, or if you've never been able to finish it. Give me some solidarity. Let me know why you've never been able to finish it, why you never read it down there in the doobly-doo. Also, weighed against the old Dracula movie, the Universal Dracula movie, it's a lot different, quite different. And we're going to go into that even. We're going to go into that subject even more when I talk about Frankenstein later this week. But yeah, let me know what you thought about it, especially if you've never been able to finish it, or if you like me. Never, never could finish it. Or if you've never even tried it and give me your reasons down there in the doobly-doo. But until next time, I have been E, you have been U, this has been another episode of 31 Days of Halloween. I'll talk to you guys later. Bye-bye!