Yeah, cool. All right, I guess we should get started everyone. I'm absolutely thrilled to have vernell noel here. I mean, I consider her a personal friend and I'm just so excited to that she gets to share all of her amazing work in wire bending and crafts and sort of formalizing these things a little bit mathematically with all of you. And this is going to be a slightly different format for a talk than yesterday's. So what what's going to happen is for now is going to talk for about half an hour, just kind of giving a presentation and then she's going to open it up for more of like an interactive question discussion section so please every time she's talking think about interesting things so we can have a really great discussion. You've all been fantastic as far as that's been concerned and all of the group so far so I know you're going to be a fantastic audience for this. So, let me give you a little background on vernell. So, she is a design scholar architect artist and the founding director of the situated computation and design lab at the University of Florida. Her research examines traditional and automated making cultures and practices interdisciplinary creativity, and their intersections with society. Her work in design and computation has been supported by the Graham Foundation for advanced studies in the fine arts, the Mozilla foundation and ideas to innovation, among others. She's also a recipient of the 2021 digital futures young award for her exceptional research and scholarship in the field of critical computational design. The red X talk is titled the power of making craft computation and carnival will put a link to that in the chat. As soon as you get started talking. So you can watch it afterwards. Dr. Noel holds a PhD from Penn State University, a master's of science from MIT, be arc from Howard University and a diploma in civil engineering from Trinidad and Tobago. And a researcher and educator at Georgia Tech Penn State, the Singapore University of Technology and Design and MIT and has practiced as an architect in the US, India and Trinidad and Tobago. So without further ado, I'd love to give vernell Noel a warm welcome and we'll sit back and enjoy her talk, the mathematics of wire bonding. Thank you so much for that wonderful introduction so beta. All right, let me share my screen. You can see my screen right. Yeah, all right, nice. Okay, so because of the program, I was excited to use you with mathematics, right. In my presentation, and I look forward to hearing from you all and the wonderful discussions that will have after this right so I, this is what I want to share with you today. As so better mentioned in my research my work I look into traditional craft ways of making, as well as digital and automated practices and how these things intersect with society, right. So just, I always ask the question or laid on the table so that we're all clear when I talk about computational design, all it means is, are using algorithms systems rule based approaches to analyzing design creating design or making design, right it might include or it might not include digital technologies and the computer. And so I started off with the question of shape, and what we call shapes and I say we as designers so you all as mathematicians, you all are going to tell me something different right so I look forward to that discussion. But how we think of shapes as these elements in space, they could be points, lines, solids, etc. But they have size, they have position, and we can speak to or describe them around coordinate systems, so we know what shapes are right. And in computational design, we may add shapes, subtract, transform shapes, and within the language of geometry and how we use geometry and design, there's translations, there's rotation, reflection, glide reflection and many more might learn from you all scaling, etc. As two dimensional, not to mention three dimensional transformations that we might carry out on shapes, right. And one of the sort of foundation computational methods in my field is that of shape grammars developed by George Steiny and James Kips, both mathematicians. No, Steiny was a mathematician gives us I think a computer scientist. So we have calculating design with shapes like I mentioned you can use it to analyze design, describe design, create design, and what I will share with you today is how I'm using an approach to the mathematics of shapes to document a particular design craft practice which you will know is wire bending right and shape grammars consist of rules and steps so rules that describe operations with left hand right hand side and computations meaning documenting of one's steps. So, I'll, before going into wire bending I must give you the context in which this craft sits because without the context, the importance of the craft does not, does not hit home, right. And so it starts here with the Trinidad Carnival. Many of you might be familiar with carnival if you're not I hope to introduce you to it. The Trinidad Carnival is about creativity and innovation. So French planters introduced carnival to Trinidad in the 1780s. And although Africans because we had slavery in Trinidad. So although Africans engaged in carnival festivities during their enslavement after slavery was abolished in 1834.  While for Europeans carnival was about fun and frolic for those of African descent, it was religion, it was a form of psychological release of tensions and from domination segregation these violent systems of control. This is an engraving from 1888 of carnival celebrations in the capital city of Port of Spain. And when I use the term Trinidad Carnival, it doesn't define this geographic location, but instead its origin and the main elements that define the carnival. The three elements defining Trinidad Carnival are one mass or masquerade that's a design part. Calypso or soca, which is our music or rhythms and the steel pan which was invented in Trinidad and to be going to 1930s by the African working class from discarded oil drums. And this carnival has spread to more than 70, you know, countries, regions around the world in the US, the UK, Canada, to name a few and other Caribbean islands. So carnival is a space of joy, creativity, celebration, education. I often think of our carnival, especially in the past as our internet of the time. This is an image of George Bailey's presentation he called Back to Africa in 1957. And this sort of public engagement in making and designing these costumes, public education by spectators being part of this presentation. Storytelling of biblical futures, real past, real histories, imagined futures, all of this took place in carnival. We also have innovations, additional innovations I should say happening in carnival. This is in 1984 Peter Minchell and his band Kallelu, where he introduced the use of fiberglass rods inserted into fabric to create what we will call textile hybrid costuming. But in addition to creativity, it has a form of these the site of innovation. It's also about community, it's about making together expressing creativity together and celebrating together. Mass camps, which are the places that people make costuming, perform, test how these costumes behave, choreographed dances, etc sing. People come together to make, there are feelings of interactions and family closeness, feelings of family bonding and friendship, while people design, make, cook, eat, drink, listen to music, all of these things happening in shared spaces. And within competitions, because it's highly competitive, but all of this takes place within that frame of competition. There's mentoring and cooperation with people mentioning feeling wanted and secure in these spaces, being taught how to respect the arts and respect the artists right having the ability to ask for advice with problems that they may be having. And it's also about engagement. Although design and making in Carnival is of itself a form of community engagement. All of the wirebenders I spoke with including designers, they, most if not all initiated and organized events in their communities. So Mother's Day events, Father's Day events, football competitions, as they said to keep their community together so all of these elements are intertwined in the history and practices of making in the culture of Trinidad Carnival. In addition to costumes that I showed earlier, we also have these large structures that are decorated and performed in the Carnival. We call them kings and queens of Carnival. I call them dancing sculptures so that I could define them, right. And one of the craft practices integral to the design and fabrication of these artifacts, these large architectures you see here is the craft of wirebending. This thing began in the 1930s in Carnival, and then it wire fiberglass rods, cane, linear rod materials are bent and shaped to create these large structures for performance. These large structures often express the metal stories of society, politics, the environment, you name it, and there are expressions of creativity, innovation and technical skill. This is an image of Stephen Derrick, a wirebender who has since passed away, but this is an image of him performing that craft of wirebending. Historically, this is a photo from 1969. Historically, wirebending is a male dominated practice, which figures in the way I treat entree into the practice, let's see. Right. And so my interrogation into Carnival began because I was noticing these aesthetic changes happening in our Carnival. And one of the things I found out during this time was the disappearance or the impending disappearance of this particular craft. And this disappearance, if it were to disappear, then it is a sign of all that I've shown before disappearing. So a loss of history, heritage, community engagement, mentoring and cooperation. All of this is tied to the craft and tied to people's creativity, their innovation, and their fight for freedom. Some of the issues occurring in the craft and other crafts around the world include little to no documentation of the practice as many times craft is tacit and unwritten and taught by these lengthy apprenticeships to a slow transmission of these changes, three dying practitioners I've so far lost four of my informants since I've started this study and changing practices happening due to, you know, global and technological changes. It's important because this craft is embedded in historical, social and political frames. It's disappearance signals the erasure of histories of celebration resistance against oppression and more. And this knowledge is tied to practitioners so that when they pass away they take that knowledge with them, making it even more difficult, more challenging to pass this culture and pass this knowledge on to others. And three, because research has shown a strong link between the quality of one's craftsmanship and its relationship to one's ties to society so good craftsmanship strong ties to a community. So now, when it comes to how I use, let's say shape grammars what I showed you before to attempt to unpack this mathematics of wire bending. I developed the Bailey Derek grammar it's a computational tool to document to aid in documenting and performing wire bending knowledge. I'll show you how I'm using shapes to document this dying practice so this is another image of Stephen Derek performing wire bending, and part of this process involved working with them observing what they were doing taking many photos sketches etc. So these are beginning drawings of my documenting of the ways that they were connecting materials the materials that were being used. And I would use these things to ask questions of why sit moves were being made. Right. So the development of it included sort of finding a vocabulary categorizing the materials that were being used capital categorizing or using symbols operations and rules to describe what was happening spatial relations. That was happening within this craft to make this tacit embodied knowledge in wire bending explicit on the left is Stephen Derek on the right my sort of analytical categorizing representations of the technical nature technical knowledge of the practice. And so this involved developing a vocabulary for the practice based on what I saw at the side what was being used. And developing rules for how certain connections would to be made the materials that would be used parameters that would be involved in the practice so the grammar has about 50 something steps and it continues to grow so it, there is no stopping to it because as I learn and change and test certain things it continues to grow. These are more images of some of the rules describing the craft of wire bending and I'll show you some more of it. It also describes steps so how one goes about making certain connections within the craft this way by it being explicit, this could be shared with others. This is an example of a particular rule, the steps involved in making that rule. And here I show an onsite image of that particular connection that why vendors made. This is another image showing a particular step in that crop him hammering the end of one of one aluminum rod and above the step which shows how that happens right, the beginning shape what we start with, and the ending shape. Another example here of another connection and the steps involved in making that particular collection using aluminum runs. And so the Bailey Derek grammar which I named after Albert Bailey and Stephen Derek, it computationally describes technical knowledge in wire bending, it's a series of drawings that describe the materials the steps and the techniques in wire bending, allowing for analysis transmission of this expertise for education and practice. This is Albert Bailey and Stephen Derek who I named the graph the grammar after. This is an example of how it can be used to externalize knowledge so that these these rules are less tied to practitioners, seeing that they are passing away and retiring from the practice. It facilitates documentation and the recording of the design and making process and shed the lights and the computational dimensions of the practice opening it up for further inquiry. So after developing the grammar. Yes, I, you know, made this thing that I could hypothesize that it. This is how it might work, but we want to test it. Right. So I conducted workshops to test on the ground really what happens when this grammar is deployed. So I had workshops and in the workshop. There would be in teams of three or four. It was done with art students and our teachers. And in the first round of it, they would make something using wire bending materials, and they would have to communicate that to another team without them seeing the artifact. In the second rounds, I would teach them the grammar and then we would do it again so that we could compare the before and after. So this involved teaching them sort of the theory or the technical knowledge behind the craft. How the materials were used, why connections were made, etc. Then I would spend time teaching them the practical so how to bend how to hold tools, etc. to make their connections with practice for a bit. So this is them using the grammar. And before using the grammar. There were conflicting standards and instruction. So this is their reporting on what was happening before they felt a lack of knowledge or understanding what was happening. There was poor craftsmanship as you can see in the images missing information and feelings have a lack of confidence of what they might do. However, after learning the grammar, there was no an agreed standard for communication craftsmanship improved. They were able to replicate artifacts, and there was an increased confidence in what they might do using wire bending. In these images, the artifact on the left is the original, the artifact on the right, a copy using only the grammar or the notes, and we see that replication is happening. So that was great. But one of the coolest things happening from this was this new collaborative approach to the craft. So currently wire bending because we don't have many wire vendors is one person to one or many artifacts, right. But because we now have the grammar. Multiple people could participate in making this artifact or artifact, but they could collaborate in the in this particular crowd. It reinforces the thoughts of mentoring and cooperation with people being able to engage by documentation analysis fabrication assembly. This collaborative approach to the craft was very, very appealing to participants. So now, in addition to the grammar develop ways that we might introduce computers and other forms of technology into the crowd. The crafters male dominated like I mentioned, and currently there's no space or place for those who might be techno conscious or interested in digital fabrication to participate. So I wanted to open up a space for women children physically in food, those who are missing from their practice to be able to engage. So I developed three ways, including the Billy Derek grandma way that people might others might participate. So the second way of crafting fabrication uses a CNC wire bender and design digital design software. So crafting involves digital design and fabrication software that I developed 3D printing, as well as all that they could before right so these new ways of engaging. These are images of site that this as a class at Georgia Tech. These are images of some of the artifacts as students we were able to make. So this is using the Billy Derek grandma and hand tools. Using CNC machine, the grammar and hand tools. And here using speculative software for design fabrication and everything that I showed you before right so these different ways of making artifacts using linear rod materials. More images of some of the weeks as students were able to make. And so, through this project, it was important that demonstrate that students could learn computation mathematical thinking computational thinking, designing with shapes calculating shapes through this craft of wire bending and vice versa. They could learn wire bending through these computational approaches to the crowd. As an architect have to test this at the architectural scale. And so we wanted to be built up a billion because we wanted to find out what wire bending techniques might be able to tell us about architecture and vice versa. So based on that grammar that I showed previously because we now had this abstract description. We could play with different spatial relations of possible connections and tectonics and test them structurally so test their performance how they would be he one. Compression and attention, etc. But new languages became possible because of this grammar. This is the image of the pavilion that we made. This is another image of it. And here are some images of some drawings of new rules that resulted from that experiment from building that pavilion, you were able to learn new things to create additional rules for the grammar so it continues to grow, like I mentioned. We also explored using it in active bending structures and active bending structures are structures that use the behavior of materials to make design. This the image I showed on the left that's an example of an active bending structure fiberglass rods and how they behave with with textiles. They're able to shape and form themselves as a pulling from that and the structure of the previous pavilion. We made another one because we had to enter light weight structures competition in Barcelona, Spain. So, here my students and I making we made several scale the prototypes of these fiberglass structures that were made out of large circles that we folded and twisted. On the right that there we are installing our pavilion in Barcelona, on the left, that's our entire pavilion coiled up in a drum case, which made it convenient for transport because we had to fly from the US to Spain with our structure. This is a picture of a finished sort of experiment of this structure. And what we wanted to achieve with this project was bringing traditional crafts, cultural practices, visual computation, how we can broaden the design space, how we could uplift low tech tech, tell cultural practices and open up all field for participation by people cultures and knowledges that are currently missing. So our project sought to integrate structure, material and culture so that they're all considered concurrently. And when it comes to my personal explorations with the craft as I continue to practice it. These are images of some of the artifacts that I've made sharing this one, these with you a few of them with you. I love lines in every way. And so, apart from the artifact what I really love are the interactions with light and shadow. Right, so on the right, on the left is the artifact and the right my exploration of their interactions with light and shadow. More images here. This is the structure for a boat that's a better will know well that we made for an exhibition on the left the structure for the boat and the right it after it's been sort of the skin has been placed on it. This is a sculpture that I did recently for an exhibition. It's supposed to speak to sort of violence and gender based violence in our society. And in addition to making these artifacts, I made speculative software that allows me to engage with the craft in different ways. And these are drawings that have been produced based on using that software which redescribes surfaces using lines. And I think that's it pretty much just sharing with you how this one in investigation into this dying practice different ways of creating multiple representations and ways of engaging with it. Not only for practice, but for education and how we educate multiple publics with this ground. All right, so I thank you very much. Absolutely beautiful talk for now. I guess we should open the floor up to questions. There's so much to think about. So, I guess if you have your hand raised. Please, or please just unmute yourself and jump right in. So you're an anthropologist too. I use some tools. Yes, I do. Yes. Sorry, my wife who is sick of math talks is an anthropologist. So she would have loved this. In addition to me loving it obviously. Yes. I have a quick question which is I think you know I first of all I just want to say thank you for a spectacular talk was really amazing really inspiring. I wonder if you could sort of your discussion reminded me of the context of various practices of making being dismissed as as as technological or as innovative because of various either raced or gendered norms right they're they're being done by people who don't look like the people we associate with creating technology or creating and I was just wondering if you wanted to speak to that context I know so better has done work in these context as well thinking about different practices that are not recognized as mathematics or not recognize as computation because of this and so I was just wondering you know that seemed like a thread running through this and I wonder if you want to just elaborate on that show absolutely so the name of my lab is after a framework I've developed in particular for my field, but I, you know, I believe it's application runs beyond my field and generally for research, which is around, you pull it up hold on. Hold on. I'll answer your question and just put this up. Good thing about having a million different slides in your slide. All right, here we go. Let me just share quickly. All right you're seeing this. Yeah. Yeah, okay.  And it's an approach to my field, which definitely privileges certain people and knowledges, but it asks that we ground our tools or methods etc in the social world by acknowledging the historical cultural and material context of our field of designing and making that would include mathematics. And it responds to a settings social and technological infrastructures and refuses to remain ignorant of social and political structures that shape them. And currently it involves eight principles, right. But that has been a guiding sort of framework for that has resulted from the works that I've done and to sit you with my future approaches to how I engage with my field and the communities that I engage with. Does that answer your question. It does and it leads to a lot of different thinking thank you for the for those slides and and will you will it be possible to share these slides with us. I think so. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. One question from chat that is can you please explain what visual computation is. Thanks chat. Really all it is is computing computing with shapes and it is it does privilege the visual. All right, because as designers like we're looking for. We're creating shapes we're looking for embedding what we perceive. How we use how shapes intersect, etc. So it's really computing with the things that we see. Really, that's what it is that and it doesn't need computers, pen and people you could do visual computing. I hope that answered your question. Just calculating the shapes.  Do you, do you have like, you know, the whole, what does it look like the instructions to produce one of those works is it. I'm imagining something like instructions for making origami or something does. Can you, can you share something like that. Good question. So, they're usually consists of shapes and words, right so it's not just shapes like we could make another round and probably it be all around shapes but usually shapes and words to make things clearer. I did, did not have any of that in my slides what I did show you was my computations for making an object and for parts that are pretty repetitive, you know just use dot dot dot, we kind of get the point. Okay, for me the, that description those instructions I find the beautiful. But they take so much time, but I do, I do love them. I do love them. Yeah, but they do take time. Just there's one quick follow on from the previous question that didn't make it in chat before the second question got asked so she's also asking. And what is speculative software. Okay, good question so the speculative software which I didn't really get to. It's a tool that I scripted right using Python in rhino so in rhino script to explore from rhino new ways that we might represent lines and use lines and designs all it is it's a tool that I developed. And that, in addition to being used for design and fabrication, the output of that is what I also play with to produce the drawing so it's speculative in that it's not, it's something I'm playing with and creating on the fly. Remy has a stand up. Hi, thank you very much for the talk. Hi question so you describe a set of rules and you explain us how it can be used to transmit knowledge. But sometimes also you can use rules to create new patterns like when you use serial automaton or certain fractals like L system was kind of things. So if that's something you explored from your rules. Try to generate new shapes that people will not have thought of. Absolutely yes Remy so if I had more time today what I wanted to do was sort of explore those you know scale rotate all of these different operations and what different spatial relations would occur for you all I didn't get around to that. However, in the pavilion, those new tectonics I showed you all of those will because we had these new rules how might we change these rules using different operations to test what some possibilities for tectonics might be. So yes, you are. There's another question in chat, would there be any way to incorporate the use of fabrics in the grammar as well. My answer would be yes, because the answer is always yes. Right. But I feel like it would be something different, because the grammar is specific to, let's say this state of the grammar is specific to linear rod connections. And when it comes to using fabric and planes, right, that is an entirely different sort of structural description, right so structurally in my mind they're two different things that can emerge from the wire bending part of it. It would just be different.  So that's the thought that's happening in my mind around the use of fabric I would say additional geometry could be an entirely different parameter whether you're using planes and lines you're using planes alone you're using planes and planes are using planes and solids. All of those explorations could be hard for sure. Another question in chat.  Have you looked at if and how wire bending has spread and or evolved with the spreading. So there are other types of wire bending so I've seen wire bending from Mexico and I see just seen meaning I saw an artifact. Then another friend bought for me, why I bend artifacts from Uganda I believe they make these amazing toys helicopters and cars using wire, and their descriptions are different. So my description is specific to the Trinidad Carnival. It's, I've only had the resources to explore that because research costs money. And so I have not had the resources to explore our bending in these other regions honestly. Yeah. It's a question from Glenn Whitney as well. He's still around. Yes, thank you so much for sharing so much food for thought and so much beauty. I was specifically wondering when I saw the pieces that you had done where you incorporated some 3d printing. I saw for example it looked like a hexagonal or a six way junction where wires could come in and be held in place by the 3d printed components. I was curious whether you'd had the opportunity to take some of these items some of these the new components and show them share them with traditional practitioners of the craft to get the reaction like, Oh, what have you done this is not wire bending or Oh wow I wish I had that 30 like have you gotten that kind of back and forth. So yes and no so the grammar I took back like it's it's really important of repatriating these knowledges right. So the grammar I've been able to take back to the wirebenders and the reception has been oh this is great. Some have even said oh I know I could use this like this could help me even in my practice right. And they understood it right I haven't had the opportunity to test it with them. I tested it with students and teachers and this is just time and everything is the realities of underground research right. But regarding the 3d printed parts, I haven't gotten again resources to be able to test that in the context of Trinidad and Tobago. However, that particular way of engaging with the practice was the least favorite of my students, and they said that it was because they no longer had the opportunity to manipulate material and improvise with the materials and how they behaved. And I felt like I made this thing I put them together and that's it so it took away from the experiential nature of the practice. How I do intend to use them though I want to have another experiment with that when things open up hopefully I'm able to do that, but I do have an idea for how I want to use those 3d printed parts, when it comes to tectonics environment. And in chat, actually we've got a couple but the first one was, did wire bending involve from basket weaving. I don't think so. Maybe an answer is I do not know but I don't think so, because it's not necessarily woven. It's more creating a framework for decoration etc. So my answer would be no, but you know crowd people see things and get ideas. There's another question. Did you have any issues with people using the grammar, could the use of this grammar be a replacement for the traditional apprentice, apprenticeships to get into the craft. I love this question, I get it all the time and I love this question every time. The, my, my answering of it, it depends on its value and what is valued, right. So, the main problem at this time is that this craft is dying with this dying craft. One of the important things that are being lost are communities coming to make together histories being lost. These opportunities for mentoring and cooperation. So it's beyond the actual thing that's being made, right, it's not about the thing. It's about what the thing facilitates, right, it's not about the product is about what the grammar and being able to work together facilitates. So someone else might make an artifact, but it's not about the artifact is the point, right. If, if communities are becoming defragmented and these rich social things are disappearing. That's the important part. So, you know, that's that's my answer to the question is not about the thing, but what they think facilitates which are the social interactions and sharing of histories and knowledges and community. Rebecca has her hand up. Hi, I was wondering, seeing the pictures of the dancing sculptures, and then the wire bending. Would it be fair to call a lot of the wire bending sort of armatures that other things get attached to. Yes, I would say yes armatures that things get attached to movement, right depending on how they attach the allow movement rotation of certain parts etc. And another part of my desire for the practice is that we are able to have different aesthetics where the craft itself is the thing that can stand out right so if we were to remove the decorations like there is an opportunity to showcase those beautiful tectonics that are happening in the craft. But I would say yes armature to some degree. All during the lightweight pavilion that I showed right we had no skin on that that in our itself to answer the fabric question that was a whole. That's a time to figure out that we just couldn't figure it out. So, but how that material behaves with textiles. That's another question I continued figuring out. I just want to mention Jaya device so you know, Brian Lara yes he's one of my favorite. That's my favorite cricketer of all artists artists and technical disciplines right I mean, yes, yes, yes. I got a couple more questions in chat so one is a follow up to the previous questions. Have you followed how your tools have impacted the wire bending crafting community. Have you seen more women becoming involved. Have you noticed a bit of a revival in the community. Thanks for that question so there is no real community because of the dying of practitioners and we don't have a system for passing on the knowledge in schools or anything right. However, in the course and actually the two workshops I had, and the class that I taught it was majority women participants right women and females. And so, I think that's a good sign for how it opens up different different ways of participating and who participates. So I can't speak to Trinidad itself because that that culture is the thing I'm trying to address that we're losing that culture we have people who bend but we don't have a system for creating a culture of wire bending. There's another question. Have wire and fiberglass always been used since the beginning, or did the practice start with other materials. Good question so fiberglass was a new introduction, I feel in the 1980s. Because fiberglass is like an industrial made materials so before you would use wire we would use cane or reads right because kind of all is all about using affordable easy at hand materials. And in the 1980s Peter Mitchell introduced fiberglass rods in his costuming, and that was used by other wire benders as oh, this is another linear rod material that has behavior, how might we use this in why So I have a sort of a two part question for you so I guess the first part is about, I guess, like the sort of commutivity of the steps in your grammar, like, how much is there like a time component to it. And then I guess the second question is, I guess. So, Glenn often leads these large scale builds, which require oftentimes people to make like small units and then join them together into something big so I was, I guess the question then would be if there isn't too much time dependence to the process. So can you build sort of community out of making like large sculptures where everyone participates. I think that sounds like a great idea. Yeah, because, you know, we have these rules and whether we choose rules or people choose rules and materials. We could communicate how or what we're making. I think for sure that could be done. So your first question about time, when it comes to documenting the rules, or the steps that it takes for, I think some steps could be made shorter, right, if they if they are repetitive. It speaks to how we document our heritage because we do not do a good job of documenting our heritage and that's just a matter of resources that we have space time and all these things, but being able to document our heritage to learn from it, create new innovations and have those for passing knowledge on is important and this is why that role of documentation is another way that people can participate in the craft so I might not engage in why I'm bending but I could be the one who documents the steps as we go along. So, I can't speak to the exact time. I can't give you an estimate because it might vary on the connections and all things are done but Thank you. Are there more questions I haven't seen anything come in chat in the last couple of minutes but if there's anyone else who has a question feel free to unmute yourself and ask I heard that Linux doesn't have a hands up button so please just jump right in we've got about five minutes left so if we have like one or two more questions I'd be perfect. I'll just say a little bit about the role of sort of experimentation in the grammar and whether it sort of facilitates it because it seems like the kind of thing where very small changes at the local level could like really change the overall structure. And so it is like, is that sort of the kind of experimentation that this sort of speculative software allowed one to do, or really is it something that you want to build a bunch of different ways and see what happens. Yeah, so just having the grammar, give people the feeling of freedom to explore what possibilities might be because then they had a starting point and they could try different ways. The software, the way I'm thinking of using it, like I mentioned I'll test that out, but the software students found constraining it did not give them the freedom when it comes to the material part of the practice the actual making like they enjoyed the act of manipulating the materials and improvising they felt that the two constrained them, but I want to explore ways of breaking that up a little bit so that it, it feels or it we tested being something that also gives freedom. So those those are the two listening lessons a little bit so far. I just want to ask a couple more questions from chat. One, could you explain what the word tectonics means. Good question to tectonics. Let me see my architectural writing memory palace. When we say tectonics in architecture what we mean are how materials come together. So a tectonic could be the different ways that people install books, right. And a sort of argument I'm making with this, the pavilion that I showed you is one of tectonics that are that celebrate specific contexts and regions. So when I say tectonics here all I mean is how these different materials come together so that we could build structures. That's, that's what tectonics. Thank you. The other question is, can you talk more about the boat. So the boat. So which part of the boat. So, so beta who contacted me. This is regarding to my math and Malcolm E. Right. And then exhibition, and they wanted a boat built for parts of that exhibition. And it was the first time I built something that was not small, but was not big, but was kind of a medium size. And I think with with wire it's, it's quite a feat. Because it's aligned it's not like a plane that gives you some structure it's aligned that kid, go out of alignment it's, it's, it's interesting. They are used CNC machine to bend certain curves, the best way I can. And using the materials in wire bending which is primarily tape that's used to keep wires together and materials together. And then we had to skin the boats a bit and I spoke about it so better and I said better talk about leather we picked this what I think is it was beautiful color in the world to skin it. And it ended up being sort of weaving a leather skin around that structure. But that's the bullets currently being exhibited. One last question. Is that CNC wire bender, a commercial product or a homebrew. It's a commercial product it's built by built by pencil lab pen SA pencil lab. And they have two times they have a cheaper one, which is 4000 something and more expensive one which is 20 something thousand dollars. I guess I'll ask a quick follow on how much of your students work is the practice of them bending the wires with their hands since you said they really like the interaction and how much of it is using the computational tools which you seem to say they didn't like so much. So the the first each, each process lasted about a week.  So the goods of their learning process and the pavilion was all know we had no treaty printing or anything for the pavilion it was all using hand or the CNC wire bender. So my students now have very strong wrists and hands. Yeah. Absolutely incredible. Thank you for your talk and all of your insight into the building of these sort of technological grammar like the construct of it with the culture of it and I think that's a lesson that we in mathematics should not forget as well so you've been a fantastic for us and we should take more of your ideas to heart. Thank you very much. Thank you so much for having me. Thank you very much. Thank you. So I guess for everyone else we have a 15 minute break and then we have the next show and ask session. So please join us for those of you who don't know it's basically a session where participants show an object and sort of ask questions about it or about their product process and the audience will also ask questions so please join us for that. And then Dave Bachman's workshop link which hopefully someone will post in the chat and if not I can do that in a minute. But I guess everyone should get up stretch get a glass of water and then come back. But thank you so much for an all that was fascinating. Have a lovely evening.


Live from San Diego, California, it's theCUBE. Covering Cisco Live US 2019. Brought to you by Cisco and its ecosystem partners. Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of day two of Cisco Live from San Diego. I'm Lisa Martin with Stu Miniman and Stu and I are pleased to welcome to theCUBE Rose Schuller, the corporate vice president of the Data Center Sales at Intel. Rose, welcome to theCUBE. It's great to meet you guys. Great to have you here too. Thank you for joining us on the very popular buzzy DevNet Zone. It's crazy. The vibe here is really, really good. The last couple of years. It's been amazing, amazing. So you've been at Intel for... 30 years. Quite a long time, 30 years also since Cisco started doing a customer partner event. Lots happened in 30 years. They'd love to understand your role at Intel and also as we're here talking about all of these waves of innovation from 5G and Wi-Fi 6 to GPUs everywhere, to bubble, edge. What are some of the things that you're hearing from customers when it comes to modernizing their data centers? That's a great question in terms of modernization of infrastructure. And there's some really interesting trends that I think are occurring. And I think the one that's getting a lot of us is really edge computing. And what we're finding is, depending on the use case, it can be an enterprise application where you're trying to get localization of your data. It could be an IoT application where it's really critical for latency or bandwidth to keep computing data close to the thing, if you will. Or it could be mobile edge computing where you want to do something like analytics and AI on a video stream before you tax the bandwidth of the cellular infrastructure with that data stream. So across the board, I think edge is super exciting. And you can't talk about edge with, like I said, talking about artificial intelligence. Another big trend, whether it's running native, running with an accelerator, an FPGA. I think we're seeing a myriad of use cases in that space. Yeah, I'd love to if we could, you know, dig in a little bit to the edge piece because you're right, it's super exciting there. It's got to be some different requirements for what's happening at the edge as opposed to what's happening at the hyperscales of the service providers or the traditional enterprise. So we've always seen over the years, you know, Intel will bake things into the chip, they'll do their magic to make sure it's there. What sort of things, what are the requirements you're hearing from customers that are help driving what the next innovations will come from Intel at the edge? Yeah, so let me break it into a couple of domains. We'll talk first about the technology and then we'll talk about the go to market. Is that okay? Perfect. From a technology perspective, you've got to look at the environment of which you're deploying the edge. So if you're in the enterprise, your IO is pretty traditional. You're going to use ethernet and that sort of thing. You move over into the cellular space, mobile edge computing, you have, you know, different backhaul technologies that are leveraged. But what gets super interesting is when you go to IoT and when you're in IoT, there's a tremendous amount of fragmentation. The IO fragmentation, the protocol fragmentation is pretty pervasive. So one of the big challenges is how do you standardize and really open up the development of those protocols to allow and what I like to say is take frictionless data. You don't want any impediments to the data getting to the compute where at the compute, you can run your analytics and really start to take data and transition it to business intelligence. So fragmentation is really an interesting problem statement from a technology perspective. And there are some interesting concepts around how do you use 5G because of the variability and the bandwidth and the different lanes and protocols and SLAs that exist in that multi-lane highway, if you will, of 5G. I think it presents some interesting technology options to master that fragmentation. From a go-to-market perspective, you can see a number of situations where we would call them snowflake implementations, you'd build them once and you'd sell them once. We had people that were very excited about the number of proof of concepts they were doing. Hey, we just implemented and deployed our 150th or 200th proof of concept. And then when you'd get them at dinner at night, they'd say, I'd say, how much money are you making? Yeah, it's not really revenue generating yet. So we found that really pulling together solutioning with our ecosystem partners, and Cisco is a critical partner in this space, we've been able to create solutions that we co-market and co-sell that allow for scale. So we put a program in place and we're starting to see some really interesting results from that perspective. So let's talk about 5G, one of the things that Chuck Robbins was talking about yesterday was this expansion and 5G, a lot of opportunities, but you're saying there's also, that brings challenges to customer environment. How are Intel and Cisco going to help customers start to unlock the value of 5G once that expansion becomes a reality? Yeah, I think that's a great question and we have to look at how we align around standards. How do we align around really creating the initial use cases? I think that's what everybody's big question is, right? What's the $64,000 question with 5G? It's what are our initial use cases beyond LTE offload? Okay, so we have a use case around LTE offload, but one of the areas that we see a lot of excitement around, and I mentioned it earlier, is video. So how can we partner with Cisco? Look at what that implementation looks like, not only on a street lamp, but also in a digital sign that might be now an interesting Trojan horse, if you will, for a small cell, and what's then that back end implementation look like? And once we understand either the video use case or the public safety and security use case, how do we then create those solutions to really bring the technology to market? And I think that's an excellent opportunity for Intel and Cisco to work together on. All right, Rose, let's bring it into your core, the data center group. Sure, let's talk about data center. DevNet Zone's been really buzzing the whole time, but I tell ya, the takeover this morning on ACI, really that core networking group is overwhelming. They practically had people on our set here because they were all coming to get inside it here. So what's the latest? Any new announcements in the last couple months or updates? So like I've said, I've been at Intel 30 years and I've been to a lot of launch events, but at the beginning of April, we had our first data-centric launch. We had seven different product launches. It ranged from the edge to the network, to cloud and multi-cloud, and covered compute to storage and memory to connectivity like Ethernet. And it was the most pervasive, exciting launch we've done at least in my 30 years, especially on the data center side. And like I said, we were able to show how the platform ingredients and the center point of that was obviously Intel's second generation of Xeon scalable architecture. That is the quarter stone, supplementing it with the how we process data on that platform, how do we move data with some of our new Ethernet technologies, how do we store data with our Intel data center, obtain persisted memory, was really kind of an end-to-end exciting, exciting launch event. We had 95 world records that we broke. Yeah, it was really, it was an exciting day, very exciting day. And again, move, process, store, talking about from a value proposition for our end customers. How do you really propel insights? Simply said, how do you use workload-specific capabilities to create acceleration of business intelligence? And we had announcements around instruction sets specifically in the CPU for artificial intelligence. As an example, with 14x improvement over a standard CPU by using that instruction, we had how do you create business resiliency with hardware security features that we're integrating? And really, how do you get acceleration of new services around some technologies around hardware and software, combination of the orchestration of those two? So some really great, great announcements. It was fun. To say it was meaty, it sounds like a massive understatement, but tell us a little bit about how customers are reacting. Because one of the stats Chuck Robbins also talked about yesterday was that less than 1% of data, organizations are getting value out of less than 1% of it. So this data-centric launch, super meaty, how is that going to position Intel in your partner ecosystem to help your customers start turning that dial up so that they're actually getting more value out of that data that they know is gold, but it's dark. Yeah, no, I think that's an excellent question. And you can look at IoT use cases like we talked about. And in an IoT use case, it's end to end. You have to compute at the edge and the network and in the multi-cloud. You have to move the data, whether it be wireless or wireless, so I think that's a pretty standard answer and approach to that question. But when we also look at trends that we're seeing in the market, and we see things like how much video content is really becoming pervasive, and the data challenges that that creates. And you look at technologies like Intel Optane Data Center Persistent Memory, and you have a new technology that solves a lot of problems around capacity issues. Capacity in an affordable price point. You have a technology that solves problems around persistence. How do I minimize my downtime from minutes to seconds? And what does that mean in terms of value? So we can sit here and Intel is really good about talking about features and new instruction sets, but at the end of the day, it comes down to how do I make more money, how do I save more money, and offer new services that are specific that my customers are asking for on a real-time basis. And I think the portfolio of that launch really kind of solidified that value proposition. Yeah, Rose, I was living on the vendor side when Cisco launched UCS. There were many in the marketplace that said, why is Cisco getting into this business? Compute's kind of played out. It's, they're all pretty much the same. Intel's dominant in that position, and just choose your favorite flavor and it's there. I think we've looked at where we are today. There's a lot going on in the compute space. Yeah. Cisco, the rest of your partners and the like, it's got to be a pretty exciting time still to be working in this, and you've seen some of those ebbs and flows over the years. I have, and I think I should start by wishing them the 10-year anniversary. I think it's the 10-year anniversary of UCS. But what's fascinating is the evolution that compute has gone through. I think when we started down the journey together with Cisco on UCS, it was I'm going to make servers, and that's the kind of the playing field for the technology. But when you think about the evolution of storage and software-defined storage, and you think about the evolution of networking, and the transition to network function virtualization, you now have a common platform that can host a myriad of different applications. So to answer your question, the evolution went from I'm going to build a server, and I think their initial position was really strong in blades, which leverages a lot of their existing relationships and customer relationships, and has really grown to now I have a compute platform for server storage network, I have the ability to play in multiple spaces, leverage my channel relationships. So I think the transformation has been amazing, and then when you think about how do I take those assets and leverage them and bring them to the edge that's evolving, nothing but opportunity for both Intel and Cisco. So here we are in the middle of Cisco's fourth quarter, fiscal 19, in a very strong FY18, the quarterly Q3 results that they released just last month, really good, strong growth across infrastructure platforms, applications, security. As we look at this continuing partnership with Cisco and Intel, what are you excited about with all the momentum that you clearly talked about with Intel and Cisco going into Cisco's fiscal year 2020? Well, I think we both have an awesome opportunity. We have just launched, as I said, the Intel second generation Xeon scalable processors. We are very well aligned with Cisco on that technology. So what do we need to do? We have that, we have obtained data center persistent memory, so we have a great set of ingredients, not to mention Ethernet and SSDs, where our job in 2020, their fiscal year 2020, is to really drive adoption, work together on co-marketing, work together on co-selling. And since we have such a collective, strong value proposition, I think there's a tremendous opportunity in refresh, new customer accounts, et cetera, to really drive mutual growth, which is the foundation of the best types of relationships when we're growing together. Awesome, well, Rose, it's been a pleasure to have you on the program this afternoon. Your energy and your excitement after being at Intel for 30 years is remarkable. Still there, still there, it's great company. It's contagious, so thank you for sharing that with us today. Thank you so much for the time. Our pleasure. For Stu Miniman, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE Live from Cisco Live in San Diego. Thanks for watching.


What is up? Welcome to the Crimson Engine. I am here today with cinematographer Ian Dooley. We are going to do a little bit of a breakdown of three ways that you can focus your digital cinema camera. The first way is going to be a dedicated focus puller and a follow focus. Ian is going to operate. I'm going to pull focus on the attached follow focus to the 15 millimeter rails at the front of the camera. The second way is going to be Canon's inbuilt Wi-Fi and an iPad to use touch focus to focus on the individual objects. The last way is going to be a wireless follow focus. Ian has the camera shoulder mounted because it's a heavier rig and he needs to have both hands on the mounts. We've attached the wireless follow focus on the off side on the right side of the camera. We have a seven inch TV logic monitor attached with a shape arm, the new shape arm which I'll talk about later, to the right side of the camera. I as the focus puller can stand behind him and get access to the wheel without disrupting his balance. I pull focus here and back across to the chips. If Ian were to start at the back of the studio and walk forward, I just have to slowly keep the shot in focus. That's the most traditional basic way of doing focus using a two person camera crew, an operator and a focus puller. You do need to have a second screen off the side of the camera so that the focus puller can see what they're pulling focus on. The second way we're going to try is activating the C200's Wi-Fi network, connecting to it with my phone and then seeing if I can accurately push tap focus and track focus through that. After about 10 or 15 minutes of setting this up, we have the focus working on the autofocus lens over the iPad and I'm able to tap between different objects to focus on them. And as Ian goes forward, we're able to keep that object sharp. It's only about two or three frames a second on the iPad. So if Ian switches over to the camera cage and I click on it, I don't get the image until maybe a second after the camera rests on it. So if you're shifting focus between subjects, it's not the best solution. But now if I spot Ian and he tracks backwards, you're going to see that he is able to stay sharp on the color chart pretty consistently because the Canon's two-pixel autofocus is tracking that bunch of things. You can also do it with faces. This is a great solution for some things. If you were shooting a two-person dialogue and you wanted to choose and you had a master with two people in it, and you wanted to switch between the two people, this could probably work. But my downside of it is that it takes so long to set up and it is such a low frame rate that you can't use it consistently. So the third solution we're going to look at is using a remote follow focus off the camera or off a remote monitor and basically get the best of both worlds. Here's a remote follow focus. So I'm not touching the camera and kind of like messing with Ian's balance, but I'm not relying on Wi-Fi. I'm not using video remote video. I'm still going off the video coming out of the back of the camera. So I'm still sort of shadowing the operator. Looking at my big, clear, TV logic, 7-inch monitor that's being updated in real time, I'm able to pull focus as things go with this nice big wheel. So if we do that a similar shot as before, Ian walks forward. Oh, wrong way. And essentially stay shadowing the camera operator while pulling focus without interfering with his balance, without interfering with his his operation. Canon has a great thing called focus assist, but you can only get it on their autofocus lenses or Canon specific C&E cinema primes. They are the only primes that communicate with the Canon cinema range. You do get a thing called focus assist. So then it's a lot easier to pull focus and that's how we did it on Noir. But for my Rokonon City Prime, it doesn't have any lens communication. So I have to just basically either use focus peaking or just get better with the lens. So this is the shape arm that allows you to mount such a big monitor in such a good position. It is a quick release so I can take the monitor off to show you better how it works. Basically what it does is instead of a friction arm, you just get one button to push to manipulate how the handle works. It also has this pretty cool telescoping feature where you can extend the handle here, flip this up to get into kind of all different positions on the camera. I use this a lot when I shoot my YouTube videos. I basically telescope it out to the front and then have it underneath the view so I'm able to see what I'm shooting as I'm shooting it. That's a little rundown on three different ways you can use follow focus, your iPad or a remote follow focus to get focus while not interfering with the camera's operation that isn't autofocus. Thank you very much for helping out today Ian. Check out his Instagram and YouTube in the links in the description. I'll also put what all these items are including the shape handle in the description as well. Leave your questions in the comments and I will see you next time.