Welcome to Toffy TV. It is the mid-field section of our season review. We have done the defence. We have done the defence, mid-field, not a great part of Heaven's team, but find me one that is. I can't believe the best part. We'll find out. We'll find out. We'll find out. We're going to start with Adrissaid Garnagai. Yes, there we go. Played 33 times, 85% pass completion rate. Goals none, assists, one. Big chances created, one. Tackles a per game, 2.9. Obviously brought them back from Paris Saint-Germain where he'd be playing with Alexis Messi. Neymar, you know, just getting a name but a couple. Just a name but a couple, straight into struggling Heaven side. How do you think he did during the season? I think he was good. Seeing some people make some mad comments about him at times. Everyone's got their own view, of course. He was good for us most of the time. Works hard in that mid-field, closes down. Knits a lot of stuff together for us in there. Is he sloppy sometimes with the ball? Yes, we had a period around Christmas where he gave a few goals away from all shape. He made big mistakes. He did have those off days, absolutely did. But without him, I think there'd be a huge hole in Heaven's mid-field. We brought him back to replace himself because we never replaced him for the three years he was in there. Could he be better? Yes, he could, but I think, I still think, just right now, he's an important part of Heaven's team. Again, you look at him and you look at Tarkowski for the season. You look at Tarkowski for every single game. Just kind of guys play 33 times. You look at those kind of things. These were important bars last summer to get some stability. In fact, didn't he miss a game? We'd already played six when he'd come in. I think he was available for every Premier League game. That's hugely important isn't it? That's what I mean. I understand there was little moments in the season, the back pass against Brighton, the back pass against Hud. They asked someone where he didn't see him. Those moments were huge, but consistency is a massive part of football. As you get into that consistency, we have a general level. That can really help a team. I think that's where he was important this season. Okay, listen, he's a completely defensive midfielder, but he's done his job for the most part. You look at the rest of the squad or what's out there. Is there anyone else in the team who could have done that?  Then maybe you get a bit more and you do get more out of that position. Don't get me wrong, the person who plays in front of the back four now should be able to do a lot more than just sitting front of the back four and just they have to know that's the Premier League and the top side to do. You look at the best side with Roderick sitting in there and how he plays and the goals he can score and how he gets around the pitch and John Stones has been amazing. In fact, that's something obviously, something Liverpool have been missing this season. It's such an important position, but it was still a big part of the consistency we needed and maybe I know people go, well that consistency hasn't really helped us, but without the image you've put in there, that's the difficult side. So yes, of course going into next season, you want some kind of, I don't know, maybe a crossover at some point or maybe you get through the whole season, but I'll have to wait and see. But I generally thought his level was good, his level was consistent. You knew what you were getting from him and that's important in games of football as well, to know what you're getting and have that steady level all the time. Players won't make mistakes and obviously coming back as well, don't forget, coming back from the French League and then going back into the struggling side in the Premier League, I was never going to be easy, so I thought he did all right. Well thank you for being good, I think people criticise him harshly in my opinion. Expect to you much of him. Is the better defensive midfield players around? Yes, but they also cost a lot of money and we haven't got that right now, so would it have helped to have on a proper centre forward? You can keep the ball, so he doesn't have to do as much work, absolutely, and options off the ball, absolutely. Would it have helped to have a settled midfield three all together and he knows you're playing with? Yes, but I thought he had a decent season, and that's my view. Yes, I think it's a position that needs to be improved on of course, but that's in the position we are, the position we're in, the position you know, and also you know I mean, I felt that he was getting sent off, not getting bookings left, right and centre, he understands how to play the game, he understands what he needs to do and it's that sort of professionalism that I thought kept it consistent and the manager of times wasn't scared to take him off and put maybe someone and that's the way it is in games on football, so I give him 6.04 for the season. So there will have been games, I imagine I will have given them a bit of an add on, but I think a 6 isn't, you know when your top player is maybe, there might have been games when I've marked them down a little bit unfairly, but whatever, there's a consistency, he got 6.9 on sofa score, which is one of Evan's top players and that's to me, that's correct, cos he was one of Evan's best players throughout the season.  And that's where he had it in my head. A couple of other games where he was poor, I'm not saying he was 10 out of 10 every week cos he wasn't, but he gave a good consistent performance and sometimes people criticise them when you actually looked at the data of the game, he was Evan's best player. Some games he had a 100% pass on that he was in, when he had a lot of the balls. So he was, you know, he thought he was good. Hey listen, good solid season. Anything over 6 in mind, is good mate, so... There you go, there you go. Let's move on to Awnana, obviously first season in the Premier League, played 34 times, pass accuracy 84%. Goals 1, 2 assists, big chances created, 2, tackles 2.2. Per game, that is. I think he came in waves this season, Awnana. I think he played the game in waves. Both games he's ever started. Which I was going to say, for a player who hadn't played that many games in the French League, coming into the Premier League almost, well, as a guaranteed starter for nearly all of the... Didn't play that many games in Germany. No, no, no, just what I'm saying. So it's coming to the Premier League and being almost like a guaranteed starter. And you know, we talked about in the defensive video about Nathan Paterson and about not actually playing loads of games so far. And his, you know, his development is ongoing. I think it's the same with Awnana. I think he came with a big reputation that we'd almost created ourselves because obviously we'd beaten West Ham to the signing and there was a lot of hype, a lot of noise about him that he was one of the next big things. And I think at times, he, not him personally, but I think when people talked about him and looked at him, I think they were expecting more from him because of that, of how he was talked up. But I think his season was quite, probably what I thought it was going to be. It wasn't this massive breakout season. And again, because there was comparisons, because he's from Belgium and similar size, there was this Fellaini comparison, which I think was a little bit silly because obviously Awnana's a different skill set. But I think he did all right and the fact that he went to World Cup as well. And there's now, I think he's a stab since the World Cup and almost a re-jig in a Belgium squad. I think he's now a starter for Belgium as well. I think he'll look at it and think I've had a good season there and this and we don't know what the future holds for him. But I think it was a good, fair season for him in the Premier League without obviously being unbelievable. Yeah, I totally agree. I think he's got it in a Belgium side. Obviously Martinus was waxing little about him and told him to go to Heaven as well, so fair play. I think Dominic Tadesco is there now, will take that on. He's a really good coach, I think he'll take him on with that. Awnana, I think just right now he hasn't quite figured out what his position is. Is he an eight? Is he a six? He looks more of a six to me. He's got to get that settled. But I think he's had some gains where you've seen the potential and you've gone wow. And there's been other gains where you've seen the rawness of him and you've gone. Or you're doing all of this to the crowd when you're not playing well, great in the end. If you're playing well, then you get behind it, of course, but don't go full Tommy Graveson too early. But I think he's got loads of potential, huge amounts of potential, and I think he could make a lot of money on him. I think he could hold on to him for another season, could make a lot of money on him next because I think he'll be better next season. But I think whoever has him, if it is us, then I think we have to make the decision. He's always, for me, being better when he's been in the double six with Ghana. When he's sat a bit deeper, he can pick the ball, Palliser that now, the caveat Palliser didn't have a great midfielder, that now, but when he dropped off and took the ball and his range of passing was good, he's got them tell us. What's funny is Lampard tend to be playing in the wrong position. He's almost like the Decori position. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Which isn't his position. And I think when Lampard had them, when Lampard was obviously the club, I think, he got lost in that when he, well, not really. I mean, cos I've always started the season well and he was playing essentially, he didn't know how to divert from that. So obviously he had, he'd have gone on one side on McNeill and Damari Gray and then Decori wasn't getting in the side and he didn't know how to move away from that and didn't quite know how to fit them all together where it's a lot easier when Decori's playing because he does become that false striker, as well, and as we've seen. But there wasn't enough opportunities. But I actually think for him, I actually think he'll, once, I don't know whether it'll be at Evan, I really don't cos I don't know where he'll be. But I think once he gets the trust of other people or the manager, sorry, he'll play in that six-roll on his own and people will trust him with the ball and trust him to move the ball. And I think that might sometimes might take a better side that doesn't rely on that hole than it would feel it to be so defensive because they don't need them, don't need to be so defensive as a team. I think this season I think because he almost plays the game at his own pace and I think that's what frustrate fans is when everyone else is sprinting round and he's sort of like jogging round and that is welcome great on you. We know that. We know what, because we're football fans and we want, we want the game. We don't have patience for people brought in and because everything else is going wrong you're thinking how come we carry a player. But that's how players develop and we've seen that with other players and you know, I know that myself. You don't give anyone a chance because you think after five or six games you think they should be the finished article. So I think he's got, I think he's come, he's had good patches and he's had bad patches and again if you had a better squad you'd know when to bring them on and obviously with James Garner coming late to the season back fit there was opportunities to take him out. Did they take him out? That's what I'm saying. There was opportunities to take him out. So I think it was a decent season for him and one that he will lane from massively and if that means we benefit from this from it next season so be it if we don't but we benefit financially from that then so be it. There's that football and we as ever fans have got to get used to that. Absolutely. I mean you could almost sometimes flip the table and put him in the six and Garner press and because Garner likes to press it's richer but there's other options as well of course with James Garner but now we had a good season, good debut season so for score I had them at 6.92 I had them at 6.21 so better than Garner so there you've got quite good for you. It's really good. Really good. You've had the ped seal of the people. Well now most of these are like there's the same basic gap between them all so I just look at it through not stats I look at it from angry that's it he made you less angry than I was fair enough fair enough he don't know that he don't know that he did he did and I think he's I do think he I know a lot of people There was certain games where I thought oh my god like Southampton Romain me lost ironically I used to go but he was brilliant that they travelled with the ball see I was I was not outstanding I always looked at players and then when they're at the how were they at their best and because then that should be the standard that they go from and and when he was good he was good he was very good and you can see what's there and that's safe air season the Premier League a lot of games physically a lot of games for them good against but well decent against ball on my class day as well he moves the ball forward as well he is a good player a good player let's look at James Garnag played 17 times yeah pass accuracy 81% no goals assist one big chances created none tackles for game one frustrating very frustrating season for him again one of those who came later injured got a nasty injury obviously against back injury which meant he didn't come back till February March time obviously by the time he was fifth it was it was April march into April then so so bow finished the season very strongly for me in terms of not his performance as a such just how he carried himself as a Premier League footballer and as an Everton player and I think there's something to work with there going forward yeah totally agree Leonie was a couple of cameo appearance as I came on against Manchester United at home and little appearance here and there and then got the injury and was out and then got back in and like I think made his full debut his full Premier League debut against it against Fulham rather a good isn't and he was actually one of the bright sparks that day you know there was a lot of other things weren't very good that day but he done well and I think he got better and better thought he was brilliant against Bournemouth on the right thought he was brilliant right wing you know right wing back that day having to do with job thought he done it really well not dazzling but just stuck to his job that Wolves away was good as well and Brighton done a lot of work so there's the tile strikes your ball picks his head up likes the ball wants the ball there's definitely something to work with so I think he's had a it has been frustrating the injury and all that but he'll be better for the season and he did finish the season strongly and I think you're right I think there's something to go from and hopefully he builds on it and builds on it he'll get fit at he'll have a full preseason with us this time which means he's ready he's at his club and full preseason and then we go from there and hopefully he'll settle down a slightly different play to what we've got as well as you said good on the ball likes to play that deeper role and just get to keep the ball moving likes to be you know almost a linchpin of times you know get it give it get it back move forward yeah it'll be just how we how we use him but I think the hard work side of his game is massively important so he doesn't and he doesn't he's got a bit of a presence about him he can't be just pushed off the ball he's got that he understands the physicality of what's needed I think that's massively important and it's quite quicker on the pitch yeah you know I'm not lightning but he's really mobile which I think sees things as well I think he sees things yeah um I give him 6.22 okay so fiscal 6.66 so not that reakin you know go back to that 0.4 a game which is not bad not bad at all yeah I think a good finish to the season and it's a good ground of the next season as well absolutely it's a good ground of the next season just you want you want you can see there might be a little bit more more from him let's move on to Alex Oboby who played he played every game in the league and cup 40 games past accuracy 79% goals 2 assists 8 big chances created 8 and tackles per game 1.8 an enigma of a player an enigma of a player a player who created more chances than anyone else I think outside the top 6 but he's just an enigma you know he scored a couple of goals and obviously the one against Leicester was huge he scored a crack and he didn't score against Wolves it's crazy crazy but he's an absolute enigma of a player because when you're watching the game he doesn't seem to affect it when you're watching him and then he'll but then he does he does he does create something and it's and when he started the season he started it really well playing in that central position I think it really suited him I don't think it suited the team as such because of the make-up of it not his fault I think he's a benefit when he had Dom up there he was better yeah that's what I'm saying you know when you've got someone on the same wavelength that's yeah you can understand that so I don't think having plays you may intend to forward so you may on the same wavelength but I don't think the team because of the make-up of the team I don't think we almost were then playing with only two midfielders as such and doesn't get round I think he's someone when it comes to defenders things he reacts to what already happened he's not he's not you know when he's a forward player that's what I'm saying but that's the problem but when you're a true midfielder I think you're already on your toes because you're anticipating things and I think that was the and he isn't he's an absolute enigma I don't know I don't know what happens with him going forward he's got a year left on his contract I don't know I don't know what what you do with him as such do you keep them stuck out on the right hand side does that really benefit them again maybe with maybe with a full back who goes past them that would really help so he can come inside and and he's got this an out ball there you need a centre forward you need maybe someone who understands how to link up the play with them I don't know it's just it's just a very very frustrating footballer it's goals are what ruin them really it's lack of goals they ruin them because he creates chances and he does he's suffered as well because we haven't had a centre forward and we haven't had someone who maybe will take those opportunities for him I think when you look at this team the way it was the goals there's just not enough goals in the side yeah and therefore you're talking about Alex Oboby you're talking one of our attack on players he's got two goals that's a problem but he does create chances so find a role for him by all means I actually think he was he was decent in midfield but I think he suffered from not having a centre forward and if you've got someone wide right left you get golden McNeill weighed in and if that's McNeill standard now of sevens then fine then get someone on the other side that does the same so it is the real thing with Alex Oboby is what you do with his contact got a year left does he want to stay don't know do you ever want to go above 100 grand a week to keep him can't ever get someone on half that who scores goals there the issues but I think he had a good solid feeling but you're absolutely right you're absolutely right about the goals if he scores eight goals you look at the season you go done well there you look at the chances he's created if he scores eight goals yeah which he should be he should be getting the box he gets in the box so he can hit a ball if he gets eight goals you're talking about an all round player of course you're right but because he doesn't score the goals and maybe the chances he creates we don't score from which is not his fault but then that's just the way you look at the game but if he scores the goals you're looking at a completely different and the two goals he did score you know arriving at the at the back post for the left you know for the left one the other one the one doesn't shoot from me out of the box bend them on right you know and we've seen do that a few times but that's the difference isn't it and there are things like well if only two that's a huge you know if he's scored six more goals than if it's not they're getting they're getting much all the clubs have former players that get at least seven eight nine goals so he'd have to weigh him but that but he is a good player and he does work hard it's whether or not it's what you do at the counter I give him six point two three which makes him my highest rated midfielder so for everyone out there he says I think he's rubbish then I he is my highest rated midfielder of the season but he's got to he's got to add that he's got to and I don't know what again I think that might be something to the make-up of the team or whatever but he's got to have more belief in what what he's capable of got to he's got to he's got to show that little bit extra players with much less quality than Alex O'Robi should go way more goals and he'd take risks so he'd take risks he got six point nine seven on sofferscores the third highest evidence score and he's actually only one or two everton players who who score when up from last season on sofferscorescores so it is it's only the goals if he adds a few more goals we'd all be going south but we still need another one because you can't but he's also one of those players because we're so terrible in the transition that when he gives the ball away it's like oh they just go it's not in trouble yeah let's move on Tom Davis again massively frustrating season for Tom Davis 20 played 20 times I can't believe he played 20 games 75% pass accuracy no goals no assists no big chances titles for game no 0.8 yeah Tom's out of contact start of five games I think I can't imagine they're going to give him a new one and he's got to a stage in his career where he's 24 now has he he's not really he's not really moved he's not really moved on he's suffered with injuries his game hasn't moved on if anything it's gone backwards because he doesn't win the files he used to win by just putting himself in between the player and the ball have fallen over which is a little trick he can't really get away from people and his best position or his position that he seemed to be comfortable with him was the number six now that's been sort of moved away from he's moved those players in his way there and he's yeah it's that anything that that Tom Davis that came into the evidence team which was a player like running with the ball a skillful player a player who would take chances it's all been that player's gone it's all been taken away from as a player and that's really sad that's really sad that again you know whether people think he's good or he's bad where he came from and how he was developing it's uh it's not there anymore and you've just imagined now Evan will probably release him which is sad Adam Atten's show he's had an aid where he's got to he's got to get himself together and get games and get playing cos he's going to beat 26-27 and have not done anything you know so lad that broken in a blaze of glory the goal against Man City probably never helped him in some respects Ronald Coomman hampered his progression and it's never really settled that I think on the call-out in the number six role he's done a decent job and maybe that's where he could play as someone who gets the ball and moves it and puts a tackle in but I think just for now I think the best thing probably for him would be to move on and get to a club where he's going to be giving the opportunity to play games and develop but I think sadly for him it hasn't really worked out and we are where we are with it we've got to the end of his contract and looks like he may well be moving on so good luck to him if he does go and get yourself in a team and get settled and get playing football rather than just being a bit power player yeah it's just a sad it's a sad just be a just be a sad end the only it's frustrating as well cos it's a player that we should have got a few million for who we brought through if he was leaving we should have got money for him when I come in yeah I give him five point one one so for score I give him six point five two yeah and people believe me eh I think that's the yeah it's just a sad ending I like Tom I like Tom as a I like him as a player when he first came in for the team obviously I like him as a lad but he just doesn't kick them he just has not kicked them one bit and that you're letting when you're not giving games that's what happens yeah but you've got a desire to play you have to you have to let's move on this is our final player in the midfield section Abdelai Dacori play 26 times past accuracy 80% goals five assist two big chances created four tackles per game 1.2 obviously under under Daish was a completely different player to what he was under Lampard if if you know this is a player that was out the door under Lampard he was gone um you know he was off the phone off the phone had a big fight and you just think the cut you know if you want to see one thing that you know and I did and how it affected us it was it was him because he scored the not only you know he scored the goal he scored the goal that kept us in the Premier League but obviously he scored big goals a bit a bright bright Chelsea forest and he really was that the player who helped you know we always knew Daish loved 4-4-2 but it was obviously he was playing as a split split striker and rather than a centre forward that dropped into midfielders and midfielders that become a centre forward then um hugely hugely important towards the end of the season yeah he was you know got his obviously felt aggrieved with Borogon on my Lampard got himself together was made up that Daish coming and took his chance wanted to stay red and didn't want to go wanted the opportunity it wasn't there Daish coming and he was straight back in the side wasn't he and he never looked back really worked his socks off stupid moment against Spares could have cost us daily no need for it with Kane cost us three games and we the wheels come off a little bit in them games that he was out for Daish didn't really know how to handle him not being there and we lost opportunities where I think we might have got points but come back and was hugely influential when he come back and five goals was his best year for everything I think I think you know we've got five goals over whatever games it was um you know you think if he'd been in the team all season in that role in that role he might have got he might have ended up with double what he got so that'd be incredible for us to have him in further I got that of being that seven eight goals a season it's his position it's the position we bought him he's never really used any so um obviously scored the goal I mean it was a huge signed a contract extension huge goal got the contract extension and obviously just happier overall happier player but very important player in the team and I think if he had gone you would have you would have witnessed little bit of that and I think it would have it would have been even worse they'd be gone be they probably gone down cos who be that I mean I don't want to well let's be honest right regdap ar eich get in the goal let's be honest right the biggest wobble Dysiad since coming out ever when he was out no of course that was stupid what he did you know put his hands on someone in a game again where if we'd had 11 men on the pitch we probably would have won it so that was on him but Dysh really that's that's where Dysh's real wobble come from and I mean that'll be the next thing almost finding someone you can play back up to him or someone you can take over from him and that's a huge thing that he needs to look at now um if that's the role we go down with the system we play but that was the wobbly ad he didn't have a clue what to do without him and that's how important he came towards the end of the season um for the second half of the season or since since February so um he's had a brilliant brilliant second half of the season just in moments maybe not in overall games not in overall you know the whole game just in those moments that we talk about with like you just don't mention the wobby there and you're talking about other players whether he was the player in the pop-up and wobby's got more technical ability in the gory the gory gets himself into the position and takes the chance so I give him I give him 5.46 that's because but I wish I had the numbers I wish I had the numbers from when he played under Dice but obviously in playing before that is has dragged his score down that's the he's had the season quite well you know he didn't he didn't pass he didn't we were rubbish Chelsea at home don't you forget how rubbish we were well I'll tell you what it was Chelsea at home just for just for clarification for you yeah did he score he was excellent around us at Chelsea we got beat 1-0 with a penalty that was all his thoughts and he lasted 19 minutes of the second game there you go the next time he played it was mangy knight of the way in the FA Cup and he was come on was the best ever and played on the pitch I think you've been a bit harsh he got 6.74 on Sophie's Cup which is one of Evan's highest and like they show because obviously the goals at the end meant that we stayed up so he finished the season under Dice very well he got a 10 on me final game he's not perfect by any stretch of the imagination but he's a very useful player with goals in him we don't have that and he can get around the pitch does he give the ball away cheaply absolutely does for us the way he's won which led to a goal and there's other occasions as well of course but still he's a decent player and had a good end so that's it that's our midfield we'll be back to do our attackers if we can find some yeah so make sure you check that video if you haven't checked out the defence make sure you check that one out as well it'll be coming up on the end screen as well so that's where that one will be give this video a like subscribe if you haven't and if you want more great videos live daily exclusives join us over on toffee tv premiere the link is in the description and it'll be coming up on the screen in a moment see you later


Live from Miami Beach, Florida, extracting the signal from the noise, it's theCUBE. Covering .NEXT Conference, brought to you by Nutanix. Now your host, Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman. Welcome back to Steamy Miami. We're here at the Nutanix NextConf, Nutanix inaugural user conference, almost a thousand people here, a lot of energy, a lot of disruption going on. A little tension between VMware and Nutanix, which is, Nutanix is embracing. Matt Eastwood is here. He's Senior Vice President at IDC, focusing on all things infrastructure. Matt, it's great to see you again. Thanks for coming back into theCUBE. Thanks, Dave, it's a pleasure. It's fun to be here. So yeah, it's good, good conference, you know? Stu and I were saying we do a lot of these and usually the inaugural ones are just like kind of big hackathons and you know, this is very well orchestrated, nice hotel, great food, good customers. What's your take on, on Next? I thought the keynotes were very well done today and so it was, you know, as an analyst, it was really nice to see them lay out a vision but also product behind that vision that really kind of extends their story. Right up front, they were very clear that they were uncomfortable kind of being boxed in with a definite, you know, kind of a defined market space around hyperconverged and clearly they see themselves as players, you know, really across the data center, across, you know, the layers of the data center but also extending out into the cloud, across that virtualization layer into the cloud. So that was really fun to see and I think the audience really, really received it well. The company's like, you're trying to kind of challenge your business because you've got to, you know, you got to put things in that have very tight definitions. If you don't have tight definitions, then what's the point of your numbers? So how do you, I mean, I don't know who coined hyperconverged this. I heard this morning it was a room in Asia. I thought it was Steve Chambers, it could have been you, I don't know. But anyway, regardless, it doesn't really matter. You guys use the term. I think you had a market scape up there. Nutanix are showing that today with the term hyperconverged. So do you size that space per se? We've, yeah, so we're setting up the tracking of that market but at this point we've done some forecasting. So we forecasted this market to grow pretty dramatically from I think 800 plus million in 2015 to a billion and a half next year and then it kind of builds on out beyond that to north of three billion. But the broader space, the overall, what market that people would refer to as converged or IDCs use the term integrated, it's really incredibly fluid. So you have these big plays, what VC did with VBlock and what NetApp did with FlexPod and then of course Oracle with their Exa. But now you have this kind of really, all this momentum in the market in the middle that's really around these infrastructures that are increasingly software defined that are going to put an awful lot of architectural pressure on what had been a market that was really more about integration than anything else. But so these markets are changing really fast. So the hyperconversion is subset of the overall integrated, what you guys call integrated, right? So obviously integrated is going to be much, much larger. We've talked about this before and TAM for integrated is essentially everything. All storage servers and networking. What you're thinking on, what percent, think out even, I don't care, give me a number of 10 years, you know, spitball number, what percent of that business do you think will be integrated in some way, shape or form, even from a reference architecture all the way to a, you know, close to a skew or hyperconverged, what percent do you think are going to go in that direction? Pretty significant. So I would start first by also kind of picking up on a few themes from this morning where if you think about what X86 has meant to the server market, massive amount of transformation in the market, which led to lots of standardization, but also lots of merchant software running on those systems. And then of course we had the, you know, the Linux and open source movement on top of that. And then more recently the virtualization movement on top. So if you kind of build off of that, it's a very, very significant part of the market that's addressable in this space. I think what I heard from Nutanix yesterday is if you take the kind of the hyper, I guess hyper scale piece of this off the table and you know, assume that the Amazons and Googles and the Microsofts of the world are going to do things in a somewhat different way. And you look at the more traditional enterprise market, the mix here becomes pretty significant I would say. You're looking at upwards of 50% of the market that will move in this direction in the next five years. And then the guys who don't move, why are they not moving? It's just they like to have sort of a roll your own. Yeah. Good seats to the socks game. I mean, a combination of things. I mean, I think, so part of it is, in any end user conversation, I think we've talked about this in the past too, you really want to kind of ground the conversation in a couple of different planes. One is what's happening kind of on-prem, what's happening off. And then what's happening kind of in a traditional vein and what's happening in a shared set of pooled resources. And what you see of course is all the growth is in the upper half of that kind of quadrant and the shared resource. And more and more of it's actually been happening off-prem but what you really need to do is give the end user a lot of room to run in terms of how they create efficiencies around their traditional applications and move them into these pooled infrastructures, make them easier to manage. A lot of the attack cost here is actually people. It's going after the CIS admin expense of managing these very discreet infrastructures. Yeah, yeah, it's interesting. When we've talked about hyperscale and baiting the enterprise, one of the numbers you and I've talked about is how many servers can I manage per person? Facebook at the Open Compute Summit said that they have, it's quarter magnitude, 10, 20,000 servers per admin but that's not a guy that really configures and does more.  So the role of what compute is and how I manage it's different. Our forecast actually that I think within the next five years, we think two thirds of stuff that customers own will be in some sort of converge because people want simple. And if you take, you've tracked a lot of the how much is going into the hyperscale guys, that means how much is left is just a standalone, I'm going to buy a server where a couple of servers has changed. I mean what do you see kind of macro level that hyperscale and service provider and enterprise? Well I think you touched on an important point Stu which is you still see massive differences between what's going on in enterprise and what's going on in the hyperscalers. The enterprises will tell you that they're managing 7,500 servers per admin and the hyperscalers are well in the thousands. They also tend to, I think the other thing we should probably see up here is what might happen next in the infrastructure itself in terms of you have a bunch of different kind of competitive threats and forces on the market, one of which is disaggregation. You have to move towards a more of a disaggregated set of resources where you can start to think discreetly about how compute, memory, and disk is applied to a workload. So HP last week even talked about composable, that kind of a story you hear Intel talking about rack scale. So there's a lot of that happening in the marketplace. But I think in terms of really what the end user wants to do and I think the Nutanix team has said this quite well, the focus on differentiation really moves into data and into apps. So how do you differentiate what the data you have on your customers and on your market and how do you differentiate using new types of applications say mobile engagement. And the differentiation's not in the infrastructure. So you want to make that easy and you want to make that something that is, you know, can really be done super simply to allow the speed that needs to happen in the business on top to go faster. Yeah, I want to get your opinion. One of the criticisms of hyperconverged as a category is that, you know, it's your compute and storage together. Nutanix talked about how it's not a homogeneous single block that they have flexibility. They have compute heavy, they have storage heavy. But at the end of the day, there is some linkage between my compute and my storage. And, you know, what part of the market does that hit? Are there, you know, certain environments where I want to just scale compute and scale storage separately? What's your take on that next? I mean, you're right. They laid out that kind of two by two today where they looked at compute heavy, storage heavy. They looked at, you know, kind of the IO, the IO officer, the IO intensity on the workload itself. I do think that is very much how end users think. But of course, when you're using these standard building blocks, you can't hit all those range of workloads with a single, with a single physical piece of hardware. So today, I think what they're laying out in terms of, I don't know, was it five or six different physical configs to cover the landscape is completely reasonable. Even in Facebook, which you mentioned earlier, they have five physical deployment types that they use for their range of workloads. And you could argue that their range of workloads is a bit more homogeneous than what you might find in an enterprise. So I think that's a very reasonable starting point. I do think that over time, as some of these next-gen architectures build out, on the physical architectures build out, you'll probably see the ability to mix and match on the fly, the resources to the workload in real time a bit more. But that's still out there three, five years. Yeah, so right. In Facebook, it has five configurations at any one point because they do refresh that at a pretty regular base. What's the impact on all this on the chip makers themselves? I mean, Intel, there's been a run on consolidation in the chip world, Intel, the Avago Broadcom stuff. What's the ripple to those component pieces for this change in the marketplace? Well, the biggest, I mean, if you kind of look over the last 10 years and what's happened with the shift to virtualizing Consolidate, what that tended to drive was higher end Binsk use on the CPU side. So Intel, even though they weren't selling maybe the unit volumes that they thought they would back 10 or 15 years ago, they actually saw a pretty nice margin opportunity in that consolidation shift that was happening. I think Intel will see, they'll see some potential pressure on their data center business in places where they don't have a strong footprint today. So networking would be a good example where you could start to see, as the networking fabric begins to standardize, you could start to see influence more on the arm side there. You will start to see even some of the edged here computing layers also start to see some pressure from alternative technologies. But the acquisitions that are happening in the space are very much of the mindset that you're going to have bigger physical footprints that are consolidated in these mega hyperscale data centers, which can be increasingly optimized, not just through software, but also through how you attach acceleration hardware with the CPU GPU model, if you will. And so there's a real opportunity to differentiate there as well for Intel. So we heard the Gartner guy, Ray Puckett, I think his name is, talking about mode one and mode two. It sounded, I tweeted out, it sounded a lot like IDC's platform two, platform three. I don't know who beat who in the punch, but you've been talking platform two and three for a while now. They're similar in concept. D. Raj, when we asked him about it, said, we're in your parlance, platform 2.5, kind of a David Goulden statement. They're using mode 1.5, which I found interesting. You would have thought that they said, oh no, we're platform three, but his point was open stack is platform three and look at what happened to Nebula and others who sort of over rotated in there. So what are you seeing in terms from a standpoint of the practitioner? How are they dealing with, again, Puckett talked about that this morning, the sort of transition from one to the other, this bimodal organization. Are you guys seeing that and how are organizations putting a veneer, are they putting a veneer on the old stuff to make it look like the new stuff? Well, I think that's kind of where the struggle is in the market today. So if you think about that two by two construct I made around on and off-prem and traditional and shared, three of those boxes are really addressable kind of extensions of the 2.0 to 2.5 where 2.5 really sort of suggests that you're trying to get more efficient, you're trying to automate a lot more of the management of the overall shared pool, if you will, without using the cloud word. But when you start to think about really where we're heading and where the investment is going to happen more and more is in these cloud native or next gen applications which are increasingly built for frameworks and really aren't really kind of coded down into the hardware, into the systems. And so I think that we're still very early days in the enterprise and developing some of these really what we would call third platform type applications. And IDC also likes to use the third platform story as a way to kind of indicate where the innovation in the market could move on top. And so we talk more and more about innovation accelerators on top of that third platform. So things like robotics and cognitive computing and other kind of advanced uses of technology, really that will extend deeper into the business. And so I think we're very, very early days in kind of what technology will mean to the business as you start to drive instrumentation deeper and deeper into the business and change the business model to one that's really more around lifecycle services that are really optimized through some sort of digital transformation. Yeah, so that's a great point. I mean, it's the combinations of technologies on top of that platform that are ultimately going to drive innovation. And so then it begs the conversation, okay, what does that infrastructure look like? I would think just in listening to you speak that, okay, think about who's well positioned. Obviously the guys like Amazon who were doing virtually, they started in platform three and improving a business model that are well positioned. But you look what IBM's doing with BlueMix, on top of Cloud Foundry, HP to a certain extent, although they don't have the developers, Microsoft for sure is in a very strong position, one would think, to bridge from past the future. John Furrier asked Pat Gelsinger, are you a halfway house? I thought Pat was going to close line, John, when he asked him that, but it's interesting to watch VMware sort of evolve from what you call platform two to platform three and be that 2.5. And it's also interesting to see Nutanix trying to accelerate some of the things that maybe VMware is putting the brakes on. VMware talks about OpenStack, they talk about containers, they talk about all these sort of platform three innovations and they join, but ultimately one looks back and says, maybe they're trying to freeze the market, slow things down so that they can catch up. What are your thoughts on what's going on between Nutanix and VMware? Well, I think you touched on a couple of, I've even heard Joe Tucci kind of refer to VMware as a bridge from second to third, so maybe not a halfway house but still kind of a bridge. But I think if you're an end user or you're a vendor that's trying to attack this market, and this is very much what Nutanix is trying to do, you want to play to a number of core advocates that you have in the data center or in the infrastructure that can help you with that transition. And so if you think about what VMware did, VMware built a really nice ecosystem of CIS admins that were empowered by the technology and they really pulled that technology in. And then what's happened more recently with some of the shifts towards this conversion or integrated building block has resulted in the need for very dynamic shifts in how the organizations are set up and managed so they compute the storage, the networking teams needed to be brought together and you needed also to bring in a high level architect or VP of infrastructure to really kind of bridge some of the gaps that were happening. I think what Nutanix is playing on or could play on is the ability for that CIS admin down at a grassroots level to continue a transformation in the data center that happens in a way that's used their term a bit more invisible. It just sort of happens because it happens at a price point or at a friction point that's a lot lower in the organization than what maybe it takes to drive a really high level million dollar plus kind of integrated strategy into the data center. So that will be an interesting thing to watch is just kind of how fluid this plays out in the data center. Now the other thing too is that there's the little rift I call the urinary Olympics between VMware and Nutanix, small Chuck Hollis blog type of stuff. But with Evo Rail, we had D Raj last year said, hey, what do you think? He's like, okay, game on. Justifies what we're doing. But Nutanix chose not to be an OEM for VMware so they don't resell VMware licenses he was on theCUBE today. He said, because we don't want to compete with our partners. Okay, what he didn't say, which is also, I think the fact that I'd love to get your thoughts on it maybe it's not a fact, my opinion is that they don't want to be a reseller of VMware because it's a crappy business. And you look at HP now, I mean, HP used to claim Iowa with the largest reseller of VMware, IBM used to claim the same thing. And I think they've got to be looking at their businesses now and going, so what? You know, we want to be a platform company. We don't want to be a reseller of technology. So Nutanix has made that decision. And I think that's pretty bold. I wonder what you would think about that. I think it's wise. I mean, there's certainly, one of the things I also heard loud and clear this week is that one of the ways that Nutanix intends to grow their business is by allowing their partners to differentiate more on top of the platform. So, you know, if there's a ding from Nutanix towards VMware with Evo, it's that Evo doesn't allow as much differentiation in the platform. It also doesn't allow, you could argue, as much opportunity to share in the profit pool with VMware in that market as well. So I think that's a big part of what Nutanix is trying to operationalize around, is give a smaller group of strategic partners. So what I kind of heard from Nutanix this week is, yes, they've got Dell in place. They clearly see an opportunity for another global OEM partner. And they also see opportunities for regional OEMs to help them in China or Japan or Europe, say. So they're very focused on building partnerships that allow those partners to really differentiate in how they bring the technology to market. But yeah, they don't want to, clearly, you don't want to just get in the business of reselling somebody else's technology. In fact, really what we're talking about here is control. And so, you know, the control point continues to move up the stack. And you want to be at front and center at that point of control as that moves up. It gets control on its margins. Stu, what the VMware perspective on this, though. So I can imagine VMware saying, well, we know that homogeneity is an advantage for the hyperscale guys, and we're trying to drive homogeneity. And we can be the iPhone of the enterprise. What do you think they're taking? But the problem is, is if you look at the reality, if we, you know, we talk to users today, most customers have multiple hypervisors. And most customers have multiple clouds, multi-hypervisor, multi-cloud world. And there's a huge opportunity in the management space of all this, which is where Nutanix is going all in with XCP, Prism, and Acropolis. So, I tell you, Acropolis, I think is going to get a lot of conversations. It's, you know, KVM-based hypervisor. Maybe I can move around and everything. Most customers I talk to that have VMware are pretty happy with it. They're not necessarily fleeing. Sure, there's costs there that maybe I can save, but, you know, OpenStack tried to pull that away for years to KVM. So, you know, yes, there's some opportunity there.  I'm curious, what's your whole take on Acropolis? What's, yeah.  And, you know, I think, if you kind of look at how virtualization's played out over the last 10 or 12 years, what you frequently heard, even from VMware customers, you know, even eight or 10 years ago, that it was great technology, it was helping them save an awful lot of money, but it was expensive. And where they actually start to feel that expense is when you get to a point where you're, you know, 85, 90, 95% virtualized, and all of a sudden, virtualization's no longer a tool to help you save money. It's something that's baked into your baseline cost. And I think that's an area where Nutanix has the opportunity to kind of pivot and help shift that conversation a bit. And so what you typically tend to see when people get, you know, kind of, maybe start to feel that way, is they shift into a more of a converged infrastructure as a way to get even more efficient with the infrastructure itself, or they start to look at multiple hypervisors and kind of broadening out how they think about usage and for various workloads. And I think Nutanix is trying to play both ways. They're giving customers choice on the hypervisor, but they're also giving them an opportunity to chase a lower cost infrastructure that maybe has higher rates utilization. Yeah, I just, I wonder that management play is a pretty lofty goal, because if you look, you know, VMware's, you know, has their management, they've bought a number of companies. Cisco's bought a number of companies. Microsoft wants to be the center of your universe. Yes. And, you know, nobody has done it. I, you know, I joke always as an analyst, I can always say, you know, that the two things that are always holding us back are management security. And, you know, does Nutanix have the right and the talent to be able to be an important part of that discussion? Yeah, I mean, I think that's, I think that's a really well asked question. And probably not something we can answer in the short segment on theCUBE, but it's a, I think they've done a nice job creating a lot of buzz around their business, around their technology, and now they're extending the conversation beyond just the, you know, what they talked about yesterday was making storage invisible was kind of their first phase. Second phase is now extending into making that whole virtualization layer invisible, introducing more choice and then broadening that out to the cloud. I mean, I think there's a nice story there, but obviously as you broaden that story out, the number of points of intersection competitively in the market grows significantly.  They're not generally revolutionary, rip and replace type of place. Well, I think the other big challenge that Nutanix will have, maybe IPO will help a little bit, but it's the big guys will just steal their messaging. Are you going to hear the same, you already are hearing it from VMware and their customers, okay, well, and I think Vinod Kosla said it and said everybody's sort of risk averse and IT are risk averse, that's not going to Nutanix, not going to change that alone. What could change it is, you know, Amazon, the cloud, Docker, you know, DevOps, I mean, those things, but this is still slow to change. And so EMC, IBM, HP, VMware, Microsoft, they're all going to be saying the same thing and they've got huge footprints, right? Trust me, you know, we can do this too. And they don't really have any incentive to drive that transformation any faster than it needs to happen, right? So they're going to play to that conservatism where they can. So Ravi Matre, I asked him, well, will we see a multi-billion dollar company emerge from the core enterprise space, not Amazon eating into it or Google or Facebook, but from the core, he said, absolutely, the conditions are there.  Do you think we'll see? I mean, we all want to see it. But will we see another NetApp emerge? Yeah, that's a good question. And you go through these waves of the last round of, you know, storage startups all were acquired and now you've got a couple of interesting plays out there in the market now, whether it's Nutanix or Pure or Nimbla, you know, where are they going to end up in the end of the day? I think really what Nutanix is signaling, I mean, I think a lot of people kind of misread it initially and saw it as kind of a client's software and hardware together, they're clearly a software company. And I think you could, you know, a lot of people rotated to it and said, well, who's going to, who would acquire Nutanix? You know, there've been a lot of rumors about Cisco, there've been a lot of rumors that, you know, Delgun and early, but you could argue that Microsoft would be, you know, that could gain as much as anybody from acquiring an asset like Nutanix over time. Microsoft, IBM, you know, but they're not going to over, IBM tends not to overpay for an asset like that. I was just, Matt, I love your point there because when Deera's compared himself against the competition, it's not a storage discussion. And really the opportunity in this space is to be that software, be that, you know, systems level.  There's a lot of work they need to do.  Yeah, absolutely. Five-billion dollar run rate, I guess. Yeah, I asked, will there be another VMware? It would have been a better question. And in the number of software companies that get to run rates north of a couple of billions, pretty limited. I mean, for VMware to do what it did and get to five billion is impressive. Now, what VMware needs to do is, you know, continue to drive the transformation, you know, well above the hypervisor, you know, NSX like you mentioned, Stu, and certainly what VSAN, and even with VCloud Air, I mean, they're talking about the same types of transformations in the data center, but the story gets a lot more challenging because the competition changes when you get into any one of those veins. It's complicated, it's challenging, you know, users are not complaining that, okay, every time I turn around, VMware is, you know, taking attacks or they're putting a new product in my face, but that's natural. VMware has to grow. If you're Pat Gelsinger, you got to keep expanding your team. Exactly, yeah. So as long as they add value, I think VMware is the gold standard, I mean, there's no question about it. I mean, they're hands down, you know, the best at what they do. And there's a lot of good customer loyalty there too, so. Yeah, so. All right, Matt, we have to leave it there. Awesome segment as usual. Thanks very much for coming on theCUBE. Thanks guys, appreciate it. Appreciate all the insight that you're providing and the framing of the market sizing, so really great, great work that you guys do, so appreciate it. All right, keep right there, everybody. Stu and I will be right back from Miami. This is the Nutanix NextConf. We'll be right back. This is theCUBE.


We all enjoy living in the modern and clean cities of today. Public health is protected largely by the underground infrastructure that forms a sophisticated sewer network. Sewer pipes are built in tender to last for a century or longer, but with time and urban growth come problems like corrosion. This costs governments billions of dollars each year, with some sewer pipes collapsing in just 10 to 20 years. Researchers at Australia's Advanced Water Management Centre at the University of Queensland have been studying these problems as part of a program called SCORE. Sewer corrosion is due to the microbial production of hydrogen sulfide. This is caused from sulfate in sewage. The water industry has been trying to minimise corrosion by removing hydrogen sulfide after it's formed, yet the high levels of sulfate creating the problem continue to be overlooked. So where does the sulfate in sewage come from? In a paper published in Science Journal, UQ researchers answered this question looking at a typical urban water cycle. A dam supplies the drinking water treatment plant with source water that may already contain some sulfate. More is added during coagulation, an essential process to clarify the water by removing suspended solids through the addition of coagulants like aluminium sulfate. When it reaches a household, liquid waste discharged by the users continues to increase sulfate levels in the sewage. Surprisingly, the aluminium sulfate added in drinking water treatment contributes substantially to the sulfate levels, so if we change the coagulant we can reduce the sulfate concentration and subsequent sewer corrosion. It's even possible to remove the sulfate from the source water using desalination. Protecting sewer pipes can be best achieved by optimising right from the source. Often this is not happening because different elements of the urban water system are managed separately. This study shows the major benefits that can be achieved with integrated urban water management if collaboration happens between all entities involved.


Don't be afraid The narcissist will use fear to control you They will give you a feeling of anxiety Concerning the outcome of something Which may cause you to avoid doing something Narcissists are liars They deceive people They tell lies But if you give them enough rope Eventually they will hang themselves If you allow them to continue on their course They will suffer its consequences They constantly contradict themselves They constantly do the opposite Of what they said they are going to do They constantly go against what they have said And people start to pick up on it They start to notice that the narcissist is fake They are not authentic They are just telling people whatever they think they want to hear So that they can get the outcome that they want You must set strong boundaries with the narcissist You must put them in their place Be clear about what your boundaries are Be clear about what is not okay for you Don't be afraid to say no Thank you for watching I hope this video resonated with you Please like, comment, share and subscribe If you would like to donate My PayPal link is in the video description Thank you for watching I will talk to you soon


The emergence of genetic data coupled to longitudinal electronic medical records, EMRs, offers the possibility of performing phenome-wide association studies, FEWAs. In FEWAs, the entire phenome can be divided into numerous phenotypic categories, according to the genetic architecture across phenotypes. Currently, statistical analyses for FEWAs are mostly unitivariate analyses, which test the association between one genetic variant and one phenotype at a time. In this paper, we derive a novel and powerful multivariate method for FEWAs. The proposed method involves three steps. Firstly, we use the bottom-up hierarchical clustering method, BHCM, to partition a large number of phenotypes into disjoint clusters within each phenotypic category. Secondly, the clustering linear combination method, CLCM, is applied to combine test statistics within each category based on the phenotypic clusters. Finally, we propose a new false discovery rate, FDR, control approach. We conduct extensive simulations to compare the performance of our method with that of other existing methods. The results show that our proposed method controls. This article was authored by Xiaoyu Liang, Xiuowei Chao, Zhou Yingxia, and others. We are article.tv, links in the description below.


Hello, I welcome you all once again to my channel Explore Education and Dr. Rashmi Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Education, and after discussing Human Rights Education, here I am to discuss with you all the methods and techniques of Human Rights Education and the lecture will be in bilingual mode and it must be useful for all of you. So let's start, methods of Human Rights Education. We have studied what human rights are, what is the education of human rights, what is the basis of it, what are its goals, what are its dimensions, what are its components. Human Rights Education means all learning through which you learn all kinds of things, that is the most important thing in which you learn knowledge, culture, and the essence of Human Rights. This is what we have studied. So when you talk about Human Rights Education in the lecture, you can't just learn it from the lecture method, because you will hear it from the lecture method and until you don't work on it, until you don't feel it, until it comes into your mind, then it has no meaning. So that's why human rights education doesn't work with normal methods. For that, you need some different participative, some demonstrative, some actionable work. The focus of Human Rights Education is not just outward on external issues, it's not just about talking and events, but also inward. We have to feel it from the inside, personal values, attitudes, and behaviors. To affect behavior and inspire a sense of responsibility for human rights, Human Rights Education uses participatory methodologies.  That emphasize independent research, analysis, and critical thinking. You will show, do some visualization, do some thinking, going beyond factual content to include skills, attitudes, values, and actions. We don't just focus on content. In fact, UDHR was launched in 1940, and it was launched in 1966. What are the rules, what are the laws, we don't have to follow the rules. We don't have to follow the rules. That's just for your knowledge, that you first need to know what's going on. After that, what are the causes, your attitudes, your behavior, what do you do? It's important to change all that. And it requires an educational structure. And for that, what kind of scientific direction do you need? That is horizontal, which is horizontal rather than hierarchical. That is, you will learn this, then this, then this, not like that. Horizontal, you should have everything on one horizon. Then, we will talk about methodologies, how do you teach human research, about human rights. So, let me tell you something here. There is a handbook of human rights education. It's very good. From that, I have taken both of your previous videos from many places. But this is mainly for that. And these are so good that I don't need to go anywhere else. So, you can also read it by doing a handbook of human rights education. So, look at the methodologies. How to do it? How do you do UDHR? How do we force you to think? How do we bring these emotions into students to work for human rights? So, it cannot be better than brainstorming for them. You know, brainstorming means that a topic is given to you. You discuss it. Write down all the points in your mind. After that, what will the teacher do? He will sum up the points that will be agreed upon. And we will discard those points. But with this, creativity is unleashed by the child. And we get a lot of points. It encourages creativity and generates many ideas quickly. We get a lot of ideas quickly. It can be used for solving a specific problem, answering a question, introducing a new subject, raising interest, and surveying knowledge and attitudes. Which things can be used? Do you want a solution for any problem? Do you want a solution for any problem? Is there a new topic that we would like to share with you? Is there a topic that we would like to share with you? Do you want to survey your knowledge and attitude? All these things. Then, case studies. I mean, if there is a particular issue on which cases can be studied, there is a lot of matter in it, there are a lot of issues in it, then what can we do? Give small groups of participants. We can make a small group of students of children. Case studies to respond to is primary data for learning. And the data we provide will be our primary data to learn. And the cases that we approach, analysis, critical thinking, problem solving, planning skills, apart from this, cooperation, team building, they can be used to set up effective debates and comparisons. If we are punished by someone who has a death sentence on any topic, then what is the punishment for the human rights? Then we will know what crime he has committed, then you can debate on it, get a case study done, so like this. Creative expression. Creative expression means that we express something from you, that creatively you have to express this topic. Now, the same Philistine and Israel are the latest topics, how can you relate to current topics? There are two human beings, the Philistines and the Israelis. So, who are the human beings? How will you tell? Which one is right, which one is wrong? These are very delicate issues, right? So, it can help to make concepts more concrete, personalize, abstractions and effect attitudes by involving emotional as well as intellectual responses to human rights. That is, the human beings, which is the right side of society, which is the right side of everything, you have to give the right answer to everyone. So, I mean, we should motivate you, we should make you think, we should force you to think, this is how human rights are taught. So, it is not only about lecturing, if we teach it, it will solve our problem. So, you can do brainstorming sessions with students and you can express your creativity by debating your negotiations. If there is a problem, you can debate. It will be negotiated in the end, this is the point of the relationship. It helps to clarify different positions on a controversial issue. If there is a problem, controversy is there, some people will debate in one page, They usually involve two or several small groups who plan and present arguments on different sides of an issue, which may not necessarily represent their personal views. Debates develop logic understanding of an issue and listening and speaking skills. Debates develop logic understanding of an issue and listening and speaking skills. Listening is also a major skill. You can say that this is a good point by listening to what you are saying on your side. Then you can have a discussion. But what do you have to do in the discussion? Ask a lot of questions. If the group is larger, you will have to pay attention. If there are some students who are speaking too much or quiet, then what should we do to give everyone an opportunity to divide the group into smaller units? When any discussion concludes, summarise the main points orally and in writing. When the discussion concludes, you can have a discussion. You can say that this point has come out. Orally, you can tell the students and in writing, you can write to them. That is the meaning of the discussion. And what can you do? Dramatisation. You can play a drama, play a role. You are in some situation.  You have been punished for death.   So when you play that role, when you get the dialogue to say, then you will be able to experience how human rights are being shattered here. How should you get it? Many dramatic techniques can enhance learning. Sometimes their purpose is for participants to experience. We want to make the participant experience that unfamiliar situation or identity that he has not faced. Whether it is a refugee or a Sharanarthi. And develop empathy and appreciation for different points of view. And if you have done appreciation for that, then you can become a witness, an advocate, a judge. You can be in such role play dramatisation. You can show films and videos. But not just show films. Before you show films, you have to pay attention to these issues. So the students will look at them carefully. They will go down the road. They will do some thinking, some analysis. You are doing human research in this way. You are doing human research again and again. You can teach human rights. You can tell them about it. That is why I am not reading it word by word. Then, field trips. Take the student to a field trip. To a place where he has not gone. Which he has not experienced. Like a jail. Like hospitals. Like international borders. Where there is a lot of problems. There are urban centres. Where you can feel. Visit might be to places where human rights issues develop. Where human rights issues develop. That they are also human. They should have the right to meet them. Similarly, games. Games are a library experiential way to introduce difficult concepts and complement cognitive learning. However, participants often remember the game but forget its purpose. Reinforce the learning value of the game with discussion and explicit links to human rights. You can say, make a game like this. But what happens with students? Generally, they forget the purpose of the game. They remember the game. So, you tell the purpose of the game. That is why we enact it. Interpretation of images. You can show them a picture. And then you can ask them their interpretation. What do you feel in it? What topic will you give it? What title will you give it? Summarize it. So, you can create emotions in it. Interviews. Interviews provides direct learning and personalized human rights issues and history. Participants need to be clear on the goals and desired outcomes for their interviews and to prepare in advance with key questions. You can ask them to develop human rights issues and interview them. So, you first ask them which questions you want to make. Will they be open-ended or closed-ended? How do you document it? How do you take out its implications? How do you take care of ethical issues? You will have to teach all of this. Jigsaw activity. You know jigsaw, right? It is a puzzle. You can fit it like this. So, they are saying that cooperative learning is a very popular technology and methodology. They are saying that this methodology builds cooperation and enables participants to teach each other. In this, you teach each other that we divided an issue into several topics and gave each group one topic. Each group works together to learn more about its aspect of the topic. The topic will read the topic very well and then it will tell the rest of the people. And then we will change the role. The group will change. So, what will happen? Every topic will be known to every individual. And since they learn more about it, it is better to learn. It should be an activity-based methodology for human rights education. This is all. Journal writing. You can write from it. There is a problem with it. Reaction, opinion, ideas. You can write from it. It happens many times. We want to say it, but we can't. So, you will develop independent or critical thinking in the students. There was so much about methods and methodology for human rights education. Now, what are the techniques? These are the methods that we will learn in different ways. But what are the techniques? There are many techniques such as workstation, contest and award. You can use fishbowl technique. You can use gallery walk exhibition. So, it happened twice. And it happened again. So, I will tell you. There was a second slide. There were multimedia technologies and a small group. There was a change. So, techniques of HRE were workstation and carousel. They said, facilitators create station. What should we do? Workstation. They said, for example, rather than a group of 40 people going through 4 activities for 2 hours, 4 groups of participants are divided among 4 activities. Workstation. What will happen in that? 40 children, 40 students work together for 2 hours. You can say, 10 students work in 4 places. And every 30 minutes, they will take their roles. You are getting so many activities in methodology. You are discussing somewhere.  You are writing a journal. So, what will happen with that? Every student will participate in every kind of activity. Workstation will continue like this. Then, contest and award. Contests can stimulate creativity among participants and draw public attention to an issue. You can say, this is a project. You will get this award. You can share an issue with Human Rights. You can get a project from them. You can get a publication from them. You will develop a habit of doing better. You will develop a competitive spirit. So, this means that regular, chalk-and-talk method and only lecturing method and technique will not work with HRE. Fishbowl technique. What does it mean? Theatering is wrong. There are some children in the middle who are doing some activity. While the rest of the group observes. And the rest of the group is observing. They will ask questions. They will comment on them. And the rest of the group will get done. They can join that activity by going. So, what can be the activity? It can be drama. It can be discussion. It can be debates. It can be that. And then, the gallery walk, or exhibition or circus. Exhibitions are in the role of some children. They do something like journal writing. They create something. They enact something. So, they will put it in the shape of an exhibition. And the rest of the students will observe it. And then the role will change. Those students will observe and express themselves. This way, you can adopt the technique of human right education. Since the slide has changed, the same slide has come. In the next slide, there were two topics in total. Multimedia technology. Because it is the time of technology. You can use multimedia technology. In small groups, students can work in small groups and do the exhibition of their work. Lastly, HRE in India. If we talk about human rights education in India, on 21st March 2009, the National Human Rights Commission organized a day-long conference on human rights education at the school level in New Delhi. A conference was organized. In the inaugural session, the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission, Mr. Justice S. Rajendra Babu, said, that dissemination of knowledge about human rights and duties must aim at bringing about attitudinal changes in human behavior. If the attitude towards human behavior is not changing, that means we need to change in attitude. That is why we need a different methodology and technique. He said that if students are sensitized about human rights, they can become instruments for social justice and development. He said that if we make students sensitive for human rights, if we inform them, then the individuals and students will become an instrument to achieve social justice and development. Justice Rajendra Babu said that the human rights education is necessary for the promotion and achievement of stable and harmonious relations among the communities. If we have to establish a relationship between the communities, such as Samanjit, Sohar, Poon and Sthai, then the human rights education is very important. It will be difficult to practice human rights without internalizing them. It is very difficult to bring human rights into action until we internalize them. We will not experience them. That is why we need to learn from different methods in which the child feels, changes in his attitude, changes in his behavior. That is the concept of human rights education. That is, knowledge should be at a superficial level. Knowledge should be there, knowledge should be there, and then action should come. So this is all about methods and techniques of human rights education. So I have covered the concept of human rights education as well as methods and techniques of human rights education of your course and topic. So in this way, I have completed this very topic too. So thank you and don't forget to like and subscribe to my channel Explore Education. I have done from my side.


Sailors from the U.S. Navy's four deployed aircraft carriers, U.S. as George Washington, and its embarked Air Wing, Carrier Air Wing 5, airlifted relief supplies to villages in the Republic of the Philippines as part of Operation Damayan. There are multiple places where in the morning we all get individual tasking. Using the helicopters from both of its squadrons, the Saberhawks and the Golden Falcons, as well as the C-2 Greyhounds of the providers, George Washington has delivered over 3,255 gallons of water. 25,000 pounds of food and 2,600 pounds of general supplies since arriving on scene November 14th. It's been really rewarding, you know, helicopter pilots. We look forward to doing this exact sort of mission. From USS George Washington, I'm Petty Officer Peter Burkhardt.