Hello there. Hi. I wonder how many people we're going to get today. Oh, are there fun things happening today? Summer. Well, on the east coast, the first full day of summer is rainy and cold. Oh, really? It's actually, it's actually a stunning day in Ireland. We've had very good weather for the past two, two and a half weeks, which is exceptional. Wow. Normally like this. But I also was stuck in meetings till 2am last night. So dear. Wow. That's a day.  No. It's a small company. We have somebody who's going on maternity leave. So I will be working. Can you take your work to the beach at least or, you know? Yes, I can do my work as long as I'm on US. Governance. So yes, I could. Okay. Cause that's, that's what I did.  Kismet. Oh, lovely. And it was, it was like 200 a week. And nobody was out there. So I would just go out there for three weeks at a three or four weeks in June. And well, three weeks in June. And it was great. It was, it was just, it was beautiful and tranquil. And so I'm missing that, but hopefully fingers crossed next week. I'll be there. For the July weekend. Amazing. And it's like an extra long weekend. Yeah. Well, there's, there's, there's, there's an awful lot of logistics required. To be, to actually execute in order for that to happen. In terms of the elder care stuff. So. Yep. Well, I, I am rooting for that to happen. Me too. All right. We can give people another minute or two. I don't know. As you said, how much we're getting here. But we'll see. And if nothing else, we can go through the white paper. Yeah. In a very productive, small working session. Yes, exactly. Let me just updates. I was working on the notes. Feverishly messaging. For right, Jones. I, I've got it here. I've got a feeling like the, the, the, the, the new system of connecting to the meeting might be like, I just, I, I was, I got in through Helen's, you know, I'd looked up Helen on the, on the calendar and so, and then copied from her, just clicked on her meeting invite. Cause my one seems to be stuck in. H land. Yes, agreed. Even I had issues. Into the zoom today. I could not agree with you more. It's a little hard to. Find like, where's the calendar, even if you just go to hyper ledger, like the calendar of events is kind of. Hiding when you. I hang on. We've got to check this. My cardia meet. Simon is struggling. Hold on one second. Sure. You want me to put it, I can put it in the cardio chat. Yes, please. I did it on Slack. So if he's there, then. He will find us. I know that's not our official tool anymore, but. Yeah, I got a feeling last night. Knocked out a few people on the. In mountain, in on mountain. Oh, there we go. We've got Ken. Hello. Good morning. Good morning. How are you, sir? Tired. Oh no, no, that actually wasn't. Yeah. No, it's easier for them. Easier for the, yes, it was. Japan. Hi, Simon. Welcome. Hello. How are you? I'm tired. Yes, I hear, I hear there's a tiredness spreading among the team. Okay. Alrighty, I think we probably have who we're going to have for today. And we have some. Team editing we're going to do. So I'll, I think I can start recording. Unless it's already recording hard to know. Nope. I think we might already be recording. So. Excellent. We can jump in to. Today's housekeeping. Let me share my screen. Alrighty. So. As we have discussed, we've moved all of our housekeeping things over to the hyper ledger official toolkit. So here we are. These are the meetings for today's meeting. Welcome June 22nd. Cardia meeting. We have on today's agenda to discuss the Cardia white paper and make appropriate edits and updating to that. And I think we're on the move right now. That we're a part of the hyper ledger family and have been working on sort of repositioning Cardia in this space. We also need to just briefly cover the antitrust policy, which is hyper ledgers antitrust policy. We're not talking about explicit business opportunities here. But speaking more generally, if anybody has concerns, please let Ken or myself know. encourage participation from all people, all participants, and that this is a safe space for ideas and discussion. If anybody has concerns with that, again, you can reach out to Ken or myself or through Hyperledger directly. So, as I mentioned, today's agenda, we've had a series of really wonderful guest speakers, and we hope to have more come and enlighten us about the work they're doing in this space and how it may align with the work that we've started here at Cardia. But today's session is really to revive that white paper that we wrote at this point, I don't know, a year or two ago? It's been a while? Might feel like two years, but it was a year ago. A year, okay. Well, it's ripe for review, and so we're going to dive into that and then outline our sort of coming goals as we enter the summer period and what we want to do with all this wonderful information that we've been gathering. Is there anybody that would like to introduce themselves today? I think we have a small crew and mostly familiar, so if you want to say hi, please do. Otherwise, we can jump into it, I think. Okay, let me share my screen. Excellent. So, I'm sharing it in Acrobat because it's going to look a lot easier on the eyes. Problem with Google Docs is it automatically sizes to considerably less than the real size and then people struggle to read and then they say, the font's all wrong and why are you making it so small? And it's because Google has rendered it at 56%. So, this is not something that can be edited necessarily, well, it can, but I wouldn't advise editing directly. I will take notes. Okay. So, broadly, the goal of this is to brand as Hyperledger, well, we needed to brand as Hyperledger, but also to, you know, a lot has happened in the last year. We've, and the text needed a refresh, additional elements needed to be put in, and so here goes. So, one difference to the past, white paper is the credits have been moved to the front. And we've also credited, we've tried to do a better job on crediting, so. Excellent. And does this include, in the credits do we need to include, I guess it's more history, the life cycle that we've went from Linux Foundation to. Yes. Well, Linux Foundation, public health for its encouragement, initial support of the cardiac project, and in particular, Jim Sinclair and Jenny Wenger. Is there anything, do we need to say more than that? I think that adequately covers the past, and then the next paragraph covers the Hyperledger foundation for pulling us into that. Excellent. Okay. Moving on to page three. So, this is an overview. It's not, I don't think it's, it's not significantly, I mean, there's some tweaks, but it's not significantly changed to the, versus the previous overview. Again, it notes the move to Hyperledger labs. This calls it machine readable governance rules at the very last paragraph is where I see that. Do we need to update that? Do decentralized ecosystem governance? I mean, if you're not in this, maybe machine readable governance means something, but we've like branded it now. So, I'm not sure I'm remembering correctly some other thing, but until the specification is formally, I think, adopted by the Diff, then decentralized ecosystem governance is in some kind of limbo as a term. Okay. And I think this is lower case machine readable governance, right? It's like the fact that it's being done by the computer neutrally potentially. I think that's fine. I just wanted to call it out. Yeah. We're about a week away from ratification of this, of the first draft of the Oh, really? First version of the machine readable governance. So, I think just need to take that into consideration if you want to line up with that or not. Maybe we need to, maybe we leave it in this page and then I don't know if we talk about machine readable governance anywhere else. We may want to transition and explain that, but that it's now under, you know, that it's under the Diff and things like that. There's a lot. So, one of the things is there's the section on machine readable governance slash Dgov has been updated. Okay. So, we get to that imminently. Anything else on page three that, okay. Well, that's just the contents, mission and background. This is the text here has been tightened up over the previous version. I think it looks okay. Can we pause for a second and just also establish the goals for reviewing this? We want to sort of shift to hyper ledger because it may be received by an audience now for the first time as a larger audience and get some excitement going. Those are the two goals. Well, also bring it, you know, bring it, you know, renovate in light of the previous year and with fresh eyes on design and communication. So, new graphics, et cetera, et cetera, which build on changes that have taken place over the year so that it's a fresh coat of paint with some additional, with an additional extension, couple of extensions. Okay. In the second to last paragraph on that side, it talks about to adapt and function for sharing and verifying multiple kinds of health data. I think put insert in there including consent. Okay. Otherwise, people might assume that it's just clinical data. Gila, what's your thought as a medical professional? What do you think? I think that's fine. I think that makes sense. And I don't know if we want to add more than that because we haven't delved into those use cases extensively yet, but I do think the consent conundrum is a well known problem. Well, yeah. And I mean, I suspect when we have a worked out how to deal with consent, we will need to do a version three of this with an additional, with a section on that. But I suspect we don't have a huge amount to say about how that is technically soluble at this point. Okay. Mark, I count, well, that was a question more so than a statement. I think adding a mention is fine, but you're right that more elaboration will be needed when we fully flush out a consent use, like a consent capture and release use case. So this has been expanded a little bit. That's good to me. Yep, agreed. I'm sorry. I'm taking a couple of minor notes. So this is new. Again, it sort of illuminates a section that we had. So this is an addition. And the message this is delivering. The thing is that for medical, most of the data will be personal data regardless of its source. So this one is less. There are some organizational credentials that are indicated, but the type of data that we're dealing with generally pushes towards making the personal data really large and the other data really small. So acts this graphic? Well, I'm still confused about exactly what the message is that it's trying to convey. Is it saying that a verifiable data could be any one of those little dots? Yes, verifiable data point. Yes. And the left half of the diagram up to people, organizations, machine sensors, connected data makes much more sense for Cardia than the right half of the data. Okay. So just remove the right half of the slide. Yes. The part at the bottom, the interoperable preserving and all that, that makes sense too. And you could just get rid of the bubbles at the top of the side and move the interoperable and other stuff as attributes of the data or descriptions of our qualities of the data. And one ledger right equals, I'm not sure. Unlimited digital identities holding that data off chain and verifiable credentials. So you kind of contrast how much has to go on the ledger in some ledger systems, ledger systems, all the data goes on the ledger. And in Cardia, the keys go on the ledger and all the data goes to the off chain wallet. But that isn't clear. Okay. For those of us looking at the slide for this first time, I would say I missed that memo. Okay. That's a really good feedback because that helps. I think we need to show the dots off the ledger if that's the point, right? Put the personal PHI dots on this page. Put the ledger on the left underneath the one ledger right and then say all the rest of the data is off ledger. Put one dot going to the ledger and all the rest going into the wallet is that kind of captures what? Yeah, exactly. You're trying to say that you do less on the ledger when we're talking about this because it's decentralized and it's held by the holder. But all these dots are sitting here on the ledger. I mean, it's just that I don't get the point of the one ledger right equals all these dots. Yeah, you don't see the one ledger right dot anywhere or the ledger anywhere. And so you can't see that the other, this big cloud of dots is off the ledger. Right. It's pretty. I like the idea of the slide, but it didn't deliver the intended message. Sorry. That's okay. That's what we're here for. So this is again, slightly changed, mostly the same, but more tightly edited. Oh, this is fun history. I'm learning new stuff. So are you telling me you didn't read the first one? Arpanet. I don't think Arpanet was in the first one. Is there any value in that second column? It's talking about email as a central identity. Is there any value in mentioning the security there as well that like that email provider in theory has access to all of their stuff because it's centralized and housed by the that third party? I let others adjudicate on that. Yeah, the fact that it is stored in a database by the provider makes it subject to tax and disclosure, you know, internal and external. Right. It provides the access to the email provider to observe all your data and also makes a target for hackers. Okay. I love that. Well, you in the second paragraph already make the database and attract the target for crime, but the key is other point is that the data is also available. Email provider is a unique statement. Right. Do we define federated identity? An authenticated login to a user profile on one platform enables, do we need to do any more explanation of that or do we think our readers will connect those dots? Should I just say, I mean, should I say such as Google or Facebook? Yeah, Google email, using your Google email to log into a different thing to something totally unrelated. I don't know how to phrase that better, but something using your Google email to log into other services. Yeah, just so that there's no room for gaps in interpretation there. Okay. Moving on. Move on. I think we, in the first column of comments, I think we need to be clear, because we still have an issue, there's still an issuing, right? There's an issuer of the credential. Why is that different than the federated one? And I think adding a sentence or two to highlight that it's like issued and now in the ownership of the holder to then reuse in a disconnected way, except to verify that trust. I don't know that that's explicitly clear. This is kind of good to do, but after a long time, fresh set of eyes, maybe it gets into it in the second thing. I wasn't there yet. Second column. I think in the second paragraph, if we said any governing authority can issue a digital credential to the holder or something like that. Yeah, something like that. Just to the holder makes it clear that the data went to them. Yeah, because it does get into it a little bit more in the second column, but I think that transfer of the handoff, it wasn't clear to me in that section over there. It's reiterated in that we know, we can know that it was issued to the traveler in the top right paragraph. That kind of goes over it again, but I think a hint of it in the second paragraph. Sure. Yep. Okay. Thanks, Trevor. That's my question. W3C, did com don't go in the same parentheses? They need a comma. W3C out of there. Yeah, I'm not sure why that was there. The did com is fine. I'm good with this page. Okay. I like this page. Sorry, what's the digital twins? So smart cities and robots, those are the digital twins? Digital twins are sort of a replication of infrastructure in digital form. So if you have something that's not very intelligent, it doesn't have any capabilities. It's an in and out of an object. You can create a digital twin to represent it in the digital world. So if you have a box of goods, it can have a digital identity assigned to it and location or movement or even though it's not capable of itself interacting digitally. Very big in industrial uses at this or it's a growth area in industrial uses. Right, because you track like product lines and things like that. I think ultimately you're going to have digital twins of operating rooms and you name it, you can have a digital twin of it, but so it's definitely a big thing coming. I think we have a more missing a word. Sorry, I jumped ahead a little bit. After agents, because they manage information flow between parties, have a fiduciary. I think it's and have or that have parties and have is missing a word in the middle or in the agents paragraph. Yes, and have. Okay, I'm moving. Anything else on this page? Mobile agents enable connections with mobile devices. Mediate that should be mediator agent, shouldn't it? Yes. Gotcha. I'm good with it. Not a triangle anymore. Do we need to put the labels we defined the participants in this? Do we need to use that language? Who's the issuer, the holder, the verifier? Those labels aren't here. They're partly there. So you have issuer agent and verifier agent. You just don't have when you where you say at the top cloud or mobile holder agent that would kind of. I can put I can we see it. I okay. Yeah, I can rework that to make that more explicit. I think it's it's if you had the holder agent in the cloud or mobile holder agent, then I think you'd have all three. Well, I was going to put holder under patient issuer under public health authority and then verifiers over here. Yeah, that would make it. I think you can leave the agents because I think that's the helpful too. But having that clear would also be good. So this is the one that's going to need some re-editing in a week or two. As a second, this is the two pages here on governance. Should we change in the fourth paragraph, the benefit of machine-readable governance, instead of as the science, should we change as the requirements or regulations changed just to make it a little bit more neutral? So one of them is to indicate that as the data from the research says it needs to be 24 hours versus 48 hours. That that's that part of it. The regulations are the ones that say you have to have a test or a vaccination or whatever. And so the two kind of play in tandem. So how do you express that that part of the the science part of it in another way? If you wanted to use another way? I will say scientific evidence for requirements. Yeah, that would do it too. Right. So I see a problem there. So I think we have to introduce the concept of decentralized ecosystem governance more explicitly in the final paragraph to make for this next to make sense. Okay. Agreed. And maybe it's just, you know, as this concept has become more adopted, it's been rebranded. I still think there's some value in referencing it as machine-readable governance. And so getting rid of that entirely, I don't know that we need to do that. But we should probably explain it and then introduce its other name in this universe. Yeah. Number one, should that be encoded? Publishes encodes? Oh, that's, I see the problem there. I think just publishes. Okay. Yes, that sounds good to me. Move on. Yeah. Find that second paragraph a little stumbly. All right. What was that? Which paragraph? The second one. It seemed, it's like a little circular. Perhaps it could be simplified. Like is a URL or web address, maybe if that goes in parentheses? I'm not, I think it's trying to say that. It couldn't be a comma there for a start. For something with an IP address, basically it's going to have a unique, each one will have a unique did. No, I think it's a compare and contrast kind of thing. It's the, if a device has an IP address and the digital identity begins with a did. Okay. Okay. I'll rework that. Yeah. It just needs a little wordsmithing to simplify its goal. The third paragraph I think approved by the World Wide Web is actually recommended. Okay. Is there official language? Kind of a nuance, but it will make the World Wide Web people happier. I think there's like four synonyms there in that second paragraph to your point, Kila. You could just, you know, website and web address is a little bit extra redundant, but you could just say IP address, comma URL, comma or web address. Because all four of those are synonyms. Well, the web address is a synonym for URL. Is it not? Yeah. I think it's an IP address is a type of URL, so IP address is of a different layer. But if you just said IP address and a or a URL, you can simplify the complexity a little bit. Yeah. Maybe also not if because it's missing the like second part of the if that thing, then the next thing. I missed the then the next thing part. I don't know. There's something about that paragraph. I've moved on. Trevor's made note. Are we still on this page? Yeah. I guess we are. Yeah. Sorry. The mobile agents instead of can or create unique third from the bottom on the right, it should say can create. They don't have to. They probably should, but they're not obligated to. Gotcha. Nice. Nice writing though. So I borrowed this from other documents we've created. Yeah, this one's okay to me. That last slide. Maybe this is just a nitpick, but like you have APIs are insecure. The third bullet point on the left side. Oh, and the next one. Just a definite. Oh, yeah. Yes. Well, sorry. I interrupted you. Say that again. I'm just going to say I wouldn't I wouldn't make that claim because I think just blanket saying APIs are insecure is not accurate in my opinion. So I don't know if you just delete that whole bullet point or maybe it's just a API can be insecure. Yeah, I agree with Steve. So we're going with APIs can be insecure. Yes, you have to do something to secure them in their raw state. They are not secured by default. They have to do work to make them be secure. Yeah. So maybe APIs require additional security layers and we're saying that that's inherent in this in the didcom solution. Yes. So figuring out how to and I think there could be a little like maybe aligning some of the language across the two, like the bad things and the good things so that they're more directly like checked off. The next bullet point after that also you might want to change it to say could can be insecure or maybe or something. I think that Sam was pretty adamant that the if you're going to have an API to a mobile device, it is fairly inherently insecure. There's not a lot you can do to fix it. The fact that servers do interesting things to secure their APIs and is kind of a well known process to address the security concerns. But it's hard to do that on the mobile the other way around. So if I want to talk to you, if I want to contact your mobile device, there's not a good API based way to do it securely. Okay. I don't have any comments on this one. I mean either my big gripe on this slide is that there are two periods after parsed on the fourth point. Oh, good. Nice catch. I've seen a whole bunch of little things that I've taken notes on, but that was good and missed that. I wonder also in those heavy text slides that we did at the beginning, do we want to make any mention about like C cryptographic signatures and privacy section? Maybe yes. I know that's a little bit of like stringing things together throughout the document, but it may be helpful because if people are getting lost in the words, like this picture goes a long way. Yep. Okay. There might be a better way to lay this out. So the schema is more clear. I think there is. Yeah. And maybe we get to it, but I haven't seen it yet. Is the schema relationship to the ecosystem? The end must be revocable is not true. They don't have to be revocable down in the fourth paragraph. First line. First line in the fourth paragraph. They don't have to be revocable. So I'm going to redo this slide because this doesn't really work. This is version two of an attempt to make it work, but move on. Yeah. So this is all this is all being redone or created and you some in the point one part of it. I think we need to emphasize the paragraph two and three are done once and not done right now. It sounds like that happens each time a patient comes through the process. Okay. Yeah. I would put the second and third paragraphs as item zero and say that this happens at the very beginning and set up in configuration. And then steps one, which is the follows its KYC process and two issues, the thing three are the normal things that happen. Do we want to? Sorry. So these are all basically one as opposed to one, two, three. No, I'm saying that the second paragraph it writes a public did. It adds a credential schema. Those two paragraphs. Okay. Those are step zero and they only happen one time at configuring or set up and that items, a public health authority, the issuer sends and scanning the QR code. Those three items go one, two, three every time a new patient shows up or does something. A number two, though, do we it's very specific. They send an email. It doesn't have to be email. It also doesn't have to be sent to them individually. It can also be a generic QR code where they can like register. How about the issuer connects with the patient to issue the credential or the issuer provides a QR code for establishing the initial connection. It doesn't have to be a QR code. Fair could be a link. Okay. I've got that. And then following the QR code or invitation URL will create a direct link or encrypted link. Yeah, because it's not, we're not yet at the credential part. We're at establishing a connection, I think. Yeah. I also think there's, it's very vague on the verifying the person using the app is the same one. There's like a lot there. So I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. Well, there may be an identity step in there where they're asking them to prove their identity. They may have, if the implementation pipeline is that or connection pipeline is that I human vetted you. And so I know you are, I'm only offering this link or, you know, onboarding method. That's step one, right? I vetted the person. Okay. So I'm only going to give you the credential because I've already vetted you. Three doesn't happen or two and three don't happen unless one's. So we're saying the vetting happened up front. So how does the issuer server verify the person using the app is the same one that registered as a patient? It doesn't. It already knows it is because they sent the invitation to that person. Okay. So then that goes away. And number three, second sentence. Okay. There's an assumption of based on step one, that being done. Sorry. I'm not sure what has to happen to three. Number, the second sentence goes away. After connecting the issuer server verifies that that sentence disappears. And we are at time. We were having so much fun. I lost track of it. It looks like we're just about two thirds of the way through. Well, yes, we are two thirds of the way through. Excellent. So, but we will need to discuss because, um, yeah, there's some substantial things. Let me just quickly. So we pick up this the next session. We certainly can. Yep. Rather than having you just try to blitz through it. Yeah. Yeah. No, I agree. Trevor, if you have a link for this, I can put it in our notes and encourage people to go review the second, the last third. Let me update. Let me update it before sending it out. Okay. Let me make all the changes that so the changes can be reviewed as well. Excellent. All right. Very good. Thanks, everybody. We'll see you in two weeks in, which will be in July. How exciting. Thank you. A fabulous day. Bye. Thank you.


Namaste, welcome to the 14th session of this course, Yoga and Positive Psychology for Managing Career and Life. Today, we are going to look at very important aspect of the intervention that is food. If you recall, in the last session, we discussed about three pillars of good health. Those are nutrition that is ahar, sleep or swapno, brahmacharya or self-control. We also discussed eight limbs of yoga, yam-niyam, asan-pranayam, pratyahar, dharana, dhyan, samadhi. If you look at these eight limbs, yam-niyam are psychosocial interventions, asan and pranayam are psychophysical interventions, pratyahar is also mostly a psychological intervention which has some remnants at the physical level, dharana, dhyan, samadhi are predominantly psychological and spiritual interventions. So based on these ahinsides of ayurveda and notion of self and eight limbs of yoga, so we have identified a set of interventions which we are going to look at in this course. So on the Annamayakosh, we are going to look at ahar and asanas as predominant interventions. On the Pranamayakosh, we will discuss pranayam. For Manamayakosh based intervention, we will look at yam-niyam, chitta prasad, managing negative emotions, how to use the positive psychology and yoga for managing negative emotions. We will also look at pratyahar, pratyahar that is ah enjoying within, going within for the true enjoyment. At Vijnanamayakosh, the interventions we are going to discuss are meaning and purpose in life, practice of karma yoga, dharana and dhyan and anandamayakosh has the interventions like dhyan and samadhi. We are not going to discuss samadhi in this course but we are going to have discussion up to the level of dhyan. Different quadrants of good life are summarized in these four aspects ahar, vihar, achar, vichar. These are the two sets of the life experiences or life activity are also used as the reflection of the basic quadrants of good life or healthy life that naturally has implication on success in the career. If I have healthy body and mind, naturally I will be able to perform best in my career. So, the four quadrants of managing self and career can also be summarized in the form of ahar, vihar, achar and vichar. Ahar is food, vihar is dwelling with whom we hang out, where we go, what kind of enjoyment we pursue, what are the things which we enjoy. These are the different aspects of vihar, achar is behavior, what should be our behavior? Our behavior also determines quality of our life and foundation of all this is vichar thoughts. So, other than the three pillars which we discussed in the previous session that is nidra, brahmacharya and ahar, these four quadrant can also referred as a quick heuristic to look at whether I am leading my life towards the ne shreyas, towards the prayers or towards the shreyas. You might recall, shreyas is that path which is wholesome, which is good in the long run and prayers is that path which looks very exciting, alluring or sometime tempting in the beginning, but long term result of that path is not wholesome, not joyful for us and for the people around us. So, these, this heuristic can also give us inside whether am I pursuing the path of shreyas or path of prayers. Today's session is primarily about food, food in the yogic tradition and ayurvedic tradition is not only source of energy, it is not only a means to nurture our physical body, food in our tradition has a emotional, spiritual and social significance as well. That is why in our tradition we human beings are not supposed to indulge into bhaktshana, not just mere act of eating, prasad is the ultimate form of food, prasad is that which is prepared with the reverence, that which is taken after sharing with others and that which is first offered to the universal being and from there we take our share that is prasad. So, the ideal of the food in this tradition is not bhaktshana, but taking prasadam. The spiritual significance of food is very beautifully reflected in the bhrugavilli in the Tathri Upanishad. The story in the Tathri Upanishad goes that there is a very bright disciple bhrugu and his father is Varun. Bhrugu apparently completed his education, came back home and Varun the father asked him how was it and Bhrugu said that was wonderful, I have learned lot of things and then Varun asked have you learned something after knowing which nothing is left to be known. That made Bhragu Redil put up because he said that this kind of topic did not occur after knowing which nothing is left to be known and then the Varun explains that in our tradition, in our family people are called Brahman, the people who understand, who have experienced the Brahman, the ultimate reality and also you also must know that then only you will be the worthy of progeny of the ancestor who were Brahmajani in our family. So, Bhragu became a disciple to his own father, asked him to direct him on the path of self-realization of Brahmajana and father said to him that go and follow yamas and yamas, do tapas and with the tapas you will get insight. So, the first insight Bhrugu got after the tapas, after the rigorous life and rigorous thinking that is reflected in this mantra which says that annam brahm heti vyajanath anna dhaved khalvimani bhutani jayante annen jatani jeevanti jeevanti so annam annam brahm heti vyajanath I know anna as Brahma, anna dhaved khalvidani bhutani because through the anna only all bhutas all organisms originate, annen jatani jeevanti and they are able to sustain their life only with the anna. So, that was his first insight. So, this is also a sutra where the notion of panchakosha is established. Human self is nothing but the encased aspect of Brahman and that encased is of anna, of man, of vyajan, of pran. So, we discussed about the panchakosha model of self earlier. This is the sutra from there the origin of panchakosha model happens and anna is identified as the first layer of self. Physical body we all know is made up of anna. So, naturally that is accepted as the first layer of self. Bhrigu actually went on doing tapas and keep on coming with the new anew insight and that is how the other layers of the self are identified in this Upanishad. We are going to talk about those other insights in the later sessions. Coming back to our discussion with the food, there is a clear understanding and appreciation in the Vedic literature that anna what we are eating is result of the whole cosmic system operating in certain way. So, the food on my plate is not only my earning or my catch. Food in my plate is given by the universal order. It is universal order through which food is made available to me and that is beautifully captured in the bhogen mantra. I learned this bhogen mantra in my school in Saraswati Shri Shumanthir and this bhogen mantra goes like Om Yantunadhyo Varshantuparjanya Subhidpala Oshadhyo Bhavanthu Annavatam Odanvatam Mamikchavatam Esham Raja Bhuyasana Odanmudbhavati Parmeshthiva Esha Yadodana Parmawe Mainam Shriyanga Mayati May the rivers flow and clouds give rain. That is the first source of anna. May the plants yield good harvest. Then the plant, it is only through the rivers and through the clouds plants get nourishment and they give good harvest. So, may I become the king of all those having plenty of food, boiled rice, curd and milk. Food is praise worthy. Odanmudbhavati, this food is verily Brahman, the creator. This will lead to greatest prosperity in the form of health and wealth. So, before taking food, we invoke gratitude to the whole universe because it is because of the river, clouds, rains, plants and people working to harvest all that. We have got food in our plate. Spiritual aspect of food is also reflected in Bhavad Gita where Shri Krishna explained that Brahma Harbhanam Brahmavi Brahmaagnau Brahmana Hutam Brahmaiva Tenangantavyam Brahma Karma Samadhinam. This ladley used for offering ghee in the Yajna is Brahma. Offering is Brahma. It is being offered by Brahma in the fire of Brahma. The destination to be attained through this Brahma Karma Samadhi is also Brahma. Aham Vaishva Narobhutva Praninam Deham Ashrita Pranapan Samayukta Pacham Yanyam Chaturvidham. That is the next verse in the Bhojanamandra which says that it is I who take form of fire of digestion in the stomach of all living beings and combine with the incoming and outgoing breath to digest and assimilate the four kinds of food. And after that in the Bhojanamandra it is said Om Pranayaswaha Om Apanayaswaha Om Vyanayaswaha Om Udhanayaswaha Om Samanayaswaha Pran Apan Vyan Udhan Saman. These are the five dimensions of Prana. We are going to talk about Pranamayakush. We have already had some discussion about the Pranamayakush. We can have some interventions at Pranamayakush and there again we are going to talk about these five types of pranas. What this Shloka suggest? It is the universal power which is behind the power of digestion of food. That is Vaishva Narobhutva Pranamayaswaha Agni. So, this is the reflection of notion of food in yogic tradition and in the Indian tradition.


Hello, friends. Hi, friends. We are at our thrift store again. You know what that means. It's time for another round of... Thrift store challenge. Thrift store goodwill challenge. Yes. But this time we're going to Hollywood Studios. Yeah, so we're gonna try to knock out every park. It's kind of cooler now, because remember I said I wanted to be cooler next time. Yes, so we did Magic Kingdom, we did Epcot, now it's Hollywood Studios time. The rules are simple, we both get $25 to pick out in outfit for each other without each other knowing, and we have to wear it and walk it around the park actually. Yeah. So let's go do this. So I'm gonna go first. I'm gonna go pick out stuff where Veronica hangs out here, because I don't want her to see what we're gonna get, but... That's the main rule. I'm not allowed to know. Oh yeah, I'm gonna make it good. He's not easy on me. How about a dip dip dip dip dip dip? Swingers, whoa, the jungle VIP. I've reached that top, that's what's bothering me. She is in for it.  Oh, she's in for it. Okay, Nate has just finished, so now it is my turn to look around for him. And I am not... Now, Nate's done. We are just both checking out. He's going to check out first. I'm going to check out after him. And we are going to head to Hollywood Studios. Bye, it looks like it's raining out. Made it to Hollywood Studios. So excited. Christmas time. So who's going first? Rock, paper, scissors, shoot. Rock, paper, scissors, shoot. Wait, you're not doing it. Rock, paper, scissors, shoot. I know you're going to do it, yes. Oh my God. So you go first. Okay, okay. All right, this one's yours. This one's yours, right there. So you go in the bathroom change and get ready to see this outfit. I am so excited. I know I got her good this time. So listen, make sure you guys let us know who won. Let us know in the comments. Who picked the uglier outfit? Was it team Nate, team Veronica? I'm excited for this. And make sure you like the video for us and share it. Let people know we exist because this is my favorite thing to do. Oh my Lord. Here she comes. Oh, she needs her ticket. Oh, I cannot wait to see this. See, oh my God.   Oh, I love it. The talk life. Oh my Lord. I love it. I did such a great job. The shirt doesn't fit me. The shirt doesn't fit me. Oh, I forgot about the Miller Lite pajama bottoms. Oh, good Lord. Oh, the hat's gotta stay on. I know, I know. I gotta tighten it up.  Oh my goodness. Look at this. Like, bring it on.  I know I won. There's no way you can top this. There's no way. I don't know. We'll see. My turn. I am getting so many looks. It's crazy. Like, this is the most I've gotten. Probably because this vest is shining so bright. There it comes. Hey. Oh. Oh. I like it. You don't like it. I do like it. It's very cool feeling. No you don't. No you don't. I see you found the same rack in the past. Yeah, there was a whole rack of these like cowboys. I mean not cowboys. I like, oh, giddy up though. There was so many. There was howdy, giddy up. But what about the heart shorts? They have no pockets. Mine don't have pockets either. My Miller Lite pants. I don't know. I don't know. I don't mind it. I feel like I'm running a marathon actually. Look at that one.  See that snow? I love it. Yes. Yeah, I love that snow. The Brookhop Project right here. Okay guys. Make sure you check out their vlog. We're hanging out and talking with them. Last question. Who do you think won?  I think because we just discovered that Nate is actually wearing underwear to the park in Mavis. Nate's outfit is worse. Wait, no. Nate's outfit is worse. Yes, so Veronica. Veronica would. Yeah, right there. No, no, no, no. Already, I've asked three people so far and they all said I won. So you got one. And we've recently discovered that we have boxers. Is there any video proof? Oh yeah. I don't know anymore because the fact that you're wearing Miller is like huge. I was gonna say I would never, ever drink Miller Lite if you're not even paying me. And you're like advertising. I don't even know anymore. Who won? Team Veronica. Team Veronica. You think I look worse? I don't. And you're drinking a Bud Light with Miller Lite pajamas. It's nobody's business. What do you think? Their boxer briefs. Listen to them. No, no, no. I'm sorry, Trunks. You did this to me. Veronica looks like she's gonna run DMC concert. She looks like she's Veronica. You've been classed here. Veronica.  I am. So somebody just literally came up and handed you these glasses. I don't know why. What do you think? Either they liked what you're wearing or they felt sorry for what you were wearing.  You need to hide yourself. I know. That's what it was. He really did just walk over and he wore blue. Wow. And then he used sunglasses and walked away. Why? Why? I don't know who you are. Oh my Lord. Well, just noticed Veronica still has her price tag on her hat. Even better. Okay. I'm gonna take a trip over to Toy Story Land to see what kind of Christmas decorations they have over there. But would you look at those? Oh yes. It means. And we're with Sam. Yes. And the whole group. And there's Na'Jka. We have not even ever been here at night. This is our first time. Wow. Brex has antlers. And Buzz has a Santa hat. I've not been here. And the Buzz, what you're meeting great. He's has a Santa hat on. We ran to get to Alien Swirling Saucer because it is a holiday overlay. I'm so excited. I'm so excited now. Okay, I just started recording but Jesse was just singing Christmas songs. How cool is that? We're gonna try to make it over to see Jingle Bell, Jingle Bam. It starts in like 15 minutes. But I'm excited because it's the first time of the year. We're gonna see it. And this is our first time ever seeing Toy Story Land at night. Oh yes. Yes. This is gonna be great. Gopna. What's that, Gopna? What's up? I'm so excited. We still didn't see the tree yet though. We're gonna head over that way after. But there it is. There's the tree. It's so weird to be young coming in. Yes.  Who won? If Veronica is dressed worse, then it's team Nate. If I look worse, then it's team Veronica. I'm sorry, Nate, it's team Veronica. What?  Look at this. It's so empty in here. She's doing donuts. Honey, I would do the same. Make sure you let us know in the comments who won. Team Nate or team Veronica? I won. Come on, guys. All right. So love to like you live. I don't think she did it good. I love you. And we do want to say a huge thank you. Believeably huge thank you to our friend Susan. Batabak. Batabak.


Hello everybody, welcome back to another After Effects tutorial. This one I'm going to show you how to face motion track for a dance video. This is really popular in TikTok and you'll see here I've motion tracked to her face as you can see the bounding box moves as it moves with her. How did I do it? Let's do it. I'll show you in about 60 seconds. So let's just go ahead and delete that composition and start from scratch. Here we go. First step, drag and drop some footage into your timeline. Excellent. Here we go. I've got a few seconds of her doing her thing. I'm just going to chop this down to two seconds because I just want to show you the technique. I don't want to render out a long composition. So I'm just going to go to composition, trim comp to work area. So we're just working with two seconds worth of footage. Okay, here we go. I've got the playhead at the beginning. The first step is you want to go to your tracker panel. For me, it's located right here. If you don't see it, go to window, make sure there's a track mark beside tracker and the panel will be open to you. The next step is you want to left click on stabilize motion. When you do that, you get what's called track points and I'll have to zoom in a bit here and you'll see it. If you click on them, you can just expand them out just like this. So I'm just going to expand this one out and I'm actually just going to place it right over her face. So it's a little bit too big actually. Not her face. Her face is fine. It's the track points. I'm just going to make this track point right around her face, something like that. Okay, good. It doesn't have to be exact. No big deal. The next step is you want to left click here on analyze forward. We are now going to analyze this track and let After Effects do its thing. As you can see, it is analyzing and keeping her face inside these tracking points. While it does that, do keep in mind that if you find that you have a analyze or a track point that isn't correct, you can go in and manually adjust them when the tracking is done. Also for you, tick talkers and you dancers, and you're doing filming, remember to keep a little bit of headspace above yourself or above whoever you're filming because that's going to come in handy because we're going to need to scale this in a few seconds. Okay, it is done. Let's get to work. Almost done. There we go. Now we're done. So if I scan through this like this, you'll see here that the track points are good. And again, remember that if the track point was incorrect at say this second part, I could go ahead and move it. If I saw fit commands had to undo. Okay, you're following along with me. The next step is we're going to go ahead now and apply it. Left click on apply. And we're going to apply X and Y dimensions, meaning up and down and side to side. Now let's go ahead and hit play and see what we got. Okay, good. This is coming along and I'll zoom in a bit here, but you'll see that the black bars are coming around the sides. And that's basically because the scaling is not correct, because when you when you track to a position, whenever the position is a little bit wonky, and you'll it moves with it, you'll get a black bar either on the side or on the top or the bottom just like this. So what you need to do is need to go to your transform panel. So I'm going to go here, I'm going to click on the little chevron of the down triangle, click on that again. And then I'm just going to go ahead and scale this up. And when you do that, now I'm going to go through it again and look for black bars. So basically, I'm just looking to see if there's any part where it kind of gives me that black bar look, it does not. So maybe we scaled a little bit too much. But that's okay. What I'll do now is I'll just set this to fit. Okay, let's see what we got now. Hit spacebar. And we have now done the dance, dancey, tic-tac-y motion track using After Effects. Thanks for watching.


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebrakes.com with jaspys high-end hit packs with a chance at a Brady Auto Pretty nice stuff in here ladies and gentlemen. So good luck. We got all the all the packs randomly packed and numbered It's only a 25 spotters. You got a 1 in 25 chance at a Brady You're gonna take all of your names randomize you a pack number And then that's what that's the pack we're gonna open for you big thanks to this group for making it happen Congrats to the people who won spots in the fillers. We did a few of those and David. Oh, you ended up with last spot mojo In between those two filler breaks. There are the pack numbers right there and we're also gonna randomize whether we're gonna go alphabetically by your names or numerically by the packs Good luck. Let's roll it and randomize it two and a two for the hard way for all the lists your names first one two three and four You got Nestor down to Matt Two and a two for the hard way for the pack numbers one two three and four We got pack three down to 15 after four All right, so Nestor with three Chad with nine Tristan with 16 Acoram with 19 Tristan with six Charles with 22 Tristan with 25 David old last spot mojo with two Clyde with eight Jason with five Michael with 11 kind with 13 Alan with 21 Arthur with 17 Alan Murdoch with 12 two different Alan M's Daniel with four Tim with seven Ken with 14 Lee with 18 Eugene with 10 Steve with 24 Colin with one Chad with 20 Nico with 23 and Matt with 15 So you can see David. Oh last spot mojo with pack two now two and a two for the hard way We're gonna go by your name or go by number one two three and four We're gonna go numerically So you'll see you'll see Colin go right to the top After we order these numerically there we go. All right now what we're gonna do I'm also gonna print out these labels I'm assuming there's no trades. I guess you could trade trade now Probably probably no trades TWC trade window close You're up first with pack one one and done We got in here. It's a thick one here We have Kerry price from the cup hockey six out of 12 Nice, we got hockey in the shot ladies and gentlemen. Check it out the cup hockey on jaskies case breaks calm All right, there you go Colin. All right David Pack two pack two is gonna be Brock Lesnar from select WWE 74 out of 99 nice Nestor with three and Nestor you have Legendary contenders Hakeem Alajuan Hakeem the dream 20 out of 25 Nice the dream Daniel with four and it is two-color jersey and autograph Breeze Hall 48 out of 50 three-color patch in auto Sparkly from from Zenith Nice Jason gets pack five There you go Daniels a Jets guy so that makes even better. He I feel like before injury. He had some Consideration right some rookie offensive rookie there consideration And we have one out of ten Islam Makavit Makachev Can tell I watch a lot of W. Did a lot of UFC you can tell All right, so that's from Panini one UFC They're actually from Chronicles one UFC all right Tristan Pack six It is Jersey and autograph James and Williams rookie Jersey and autograph from spectra 68 out of 99. He's the number two pound for pound five. There you go Tristan gets the out of 99 James and willing spectra RPA Love the way the spectra looks all right Tim With seven this one feels a little bit heavier. It's graded and it is Wow the Tom Brady Absolutely inked Tom Brady autograph Graded an eight five two out of 25 Centering is a nine five corners and eight edges a nine surface a nine or an eight five from 2003 Absolute memorabilia you can see the little playoff stamp right in the middle there as well So according to the item description the last sale for this Was a $2,400 That's awesome Tim with a spot that he won congrats Two out of 25. All right. Well, let's keep going. Let's see what other stuff we can get here You saw the checklist a lot of good stuff remaining Clyde with pack eight It's a Devonta Smith RPA from Panini black 10 out of 149 Chad with pack nine Looks like FDU is pulling away or a Florida Atlantic that is is pulling away from 16 seat after you We have a gypsy queen autograph wander Franco rookie Otto 29 out of 50 nice one Chad Eugene pack 10 Jersey and autograph. It's SGA From NT six out of 49 colossal Jersey and autograph nice from 2020 2021 Nice Eugene Michael you got number 11 Dual relic and autograph or no single relic and autograph Charles Woodson five out of five from impeccable nice And all aboard the Big Head Express And Alan with number 12 It's David Ortiz big poppy. That's also a train whistle five out of five a little bit of ink on that Jersey there, too Nice Alan All aboard the Big Head Express It's with a spot that he won to nice pack 13 for time It is momentous rookies Kauai Leonard I've heard of him nice rookie autograph Kauai Leonard Kenneth is pack 14 It is a Kamaru Uzman 89 out of 99 marks of greatness autograph Didn't wasn't there wasn't there a fight recently Who won oh? I saw it Leon Edwards bests Kamaru Uzman again to retain UFC crown Good penmanship there as well. Yeah lost, but great fighters this time All right, so there you go Ken. All right. We got Matt the pack 15 Cornerstones quad relic and autograph Colin Sexton 11 out of 49 in 2018 19 nice cornerstones RPA Tristan pack 16 What do we have here? brilliance gold ink autograph Alexi Lafreniere Nice, that's a real sharp-looking card From 2020 2021 the cup hockey Nice right Arthur pack 17 it is a Jalen Hertz Donner's football power plus autograph From 2022 Donner's football What a season for him In 2022 Hopefully he keeps it going Lee pack 18 It is grid iron force autograph Dion Sanders Cowboys edition 17 out of 25 coach coach prime a Corum with pack 19 and it is Jalen green rookie autograph 12 out of 49. It's great youngster for the Rockets Chad with packed 20 It is 21 out of 49 Bo Jackson this guy knows From Immaculate Baseball Bo Jackson From 2014 2014 Immaculate Baseball. There you go Chad pack 21 a graded card PSA 10 Dangerous Russell Wilson from 2012 tops chrome. That's rookie Russell Wilson Nice one Alan. It's got Sean Peyton as a coach now. That could be the difference Charles pack 22. Let's see what we got. We've got boom explosive JJ Watt 5 out of 10 Explosive. All right a few more to go. We got Nico pack 23 With a neon pink origins autograph Desmond Ritter. That's a six out of eight Let's see if he takes it to the next level next year or I guess later this year next season This upcoming season All right Steve pack 24 Graded PSA 10 Ezekiel Tovar from 2021 Bowman chrome prospect autograph I guess that's the valuation right there There you go Steve. Thanks for grabbing the spot Prospect to keep an eye on All right, and finally Tristan With a spot that you won in the filler Get randomized pack 25 Let's see what we got We got an on-card Justin Herbert award winners autograph Yeah, if you were keeping track of the checklist You knew what was coming up like time nice on-card Justin Herbert autograph from 2022 Nice, there you go Tristan, and there you go everybody. That was a lot of fun. That was Jaspie's high-end hit packs Thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with us, and we'll see you next time for the next one. Bye. Bye


Haki is one of the worst power systems in all of anime. Whoa, whoa, whoa, what? I mean, Haki is still pretty mad, but still what? Hello and welcome to the Grand Line Review source for everything One Piece. And today we are getting a bit spicy because my audience have opinions and I am going to be subjected to them. Opinions about One Piece specifically, a near universally praised series, the highest selling comic book of all time by a single author, blah, blah, blah, you know the stuff. However, do any of those things make One Piece perfect? No, definitely not. And so I asked to hear your most unpopular opinions regarding series in an effort to find the most unpopular opinion in the One Piece fandom. And I think that we have some pretty decent contenders here today. Like subscribing to the Grand Line Review, which will result in a regular injection of One Piece culture administered straight into your YouTube feed. And personally, I don't think that's wildly controversial, but apparently a good 55% of you do. So let's start changing that and please do say hi in the comments below if you are a new member of the Grand Fleet, welcome. But we will now begin our quest. The quest to find the worst take in the One Piece fan base. And so let's begin immediately with, it's okay to like both Zoro and Sanji. Ha ha ha ha ha, get out. No, but seriously, it's definitely okay to like both of them, but we do need to like one of them just a little bit more, the green one specifically. No, but seriously, seriously, you are free to like whoever you want and Zoro fans, please stop assaulting the Sanji stands with all of Zoro's achievements. It just gets a bit old after a while.  We get it, Zoro can fight good. It's literally like the only thing he can do. Of course he's gonna be good at it, but Sanji is good at many things. He's a very useful lad. Smoker was never strong and never will be Luffy's garb. Luffy just couldn't touch him because of his DF. Yeah, I don't know about that. Smoker is, I would say, reasonably strong. Although he has been on a pretty rough losing streak post time skip. I mean, he lost to Trafalgar Laws. He's a clown, Vice Admiral Virgo and Dolphin Mingo, all of which happened in the space of exactly one arc actually.  Manga readers tend to over exaggerate the badass of the anime adaptation. I think he means to say badness. While certainly not perfect, it is a great way to experience the story and has some great fight animations. So this is probably an unpopular opinion for manga readers, which, well, that'd be me. And yeah, I definitely include myself in that. In the past, I've been pretty incredibly harsh on the anime, but to be fair, it does kind of deserve it. I don't know, what do you want me to say? Am I supposed to think it's a good thing that Toei is artificially dragging out the series simply in order to fit an outdated business model for a purely profit motive? However, I will say that the anime has gotten significantly better in the Wano era. And there are definitely times where it's even superior to the manga. So there we go, that's probably an unpopular opinion of my own right there. I preferred when the show's main power were the devil fruits rather than Haki. Yeah, I think I agree with this actually. Haki is interesting and I would definitely argue that it was a necessary development given how long one piece has become, but I really do dislike how devil fruit seemed to be more or less a bit of a side feature post time skip and the focus is predominantly on Haki.  Haki is one of the worst power systems in all of anime. Whoa, whoa, whoa, what? I mean, Haki is still pretty mere, but still what? All right, look, as much as I don't think it's anywhere near as great as devil fruits where Haki is, it's still pretty all right. It is a solid pass. It gives us enough variety to explore the concept for half a thousand chapters and not get entirely bored with it. So I do have to give it that, especially when you consider stuff like, say, the Dragon Ball power system, which is just, you know, I have more power key, so I win. Well, the Bleach system where most of the time, it's, well, I have more power Reatsu, so I win. And when you think about it, you guys entire power system was just the ability to cheat a card game, so. Shanks giving up his arm for the future still looks like a major plot hole to me. And I don't know if plot hole is quite the right word, mostly because whole better describes the injury that Ace received and not the one that Shanks received. I do sort of agree though, like it's always a bit strange to look back on that event because it really probably shouldn't have happened. The deeper we go into One Piece and the higher the power creep becomes, the weirder the event is in retrospect. And no, Shanks was not an emperor of the sea at the time, but even then he should have been able to negate the Lord of the Coast quite simply, considering that's exactly what Luffy could do at the very start of his journey. My only real explanation is that One Piece was intended to be so short at that stage that this imbalance of power was never supposed to manifest. If One Piece had run as planned, then I don't think this would be an issue. Thriller Bark is underrated and the fans, including you, do it dirty. I think it is heavily underrated though, and I will admit to being part of that problem, sorry. Thriller Bark is definitely enjoyable, one might even say amazing in isolation. However, in context with the rest of the series, it just doesn't quite do enough for me to warrant it being anywhere near as long as it is. It's 48 chapters, so it took over a year to publish in real time and all of the really amazing stuff happens in like the last quarter of that. Plus it gets very unfortunately sandwiched by Water Seven on one side and Saab at the Archipelago on the other, both of which were huge landmark moments in the series. So Thriller Bark does end up looking worse than it actually is, simply through the destructive power of juxtaposition. Nami forgave Jinbei far too easily. Ooh, that's a spicy opinion, I'm not sure I've heard before. It's a pretty complex issue actually because in the end, Jinbei is directly responsible for Nami's entire terrible childhood. He actively made sure to use his power as a warlord to free Arlong, a man he knew had a violent hatred for humanity, as well as a profound lust to enact that violence. And Jinbei just, you know, went and let him do his own thing. I mean, really, what did Jinbei think Arlong was going to do? Settle down and have some sort of nice Kawaii shark family? Then again, we do have to say that the one ultimately responsible will always be Arlong. Still, at the very least, it was gross negligence, and I guess general incompetence on the part of Jinbei. So yeah, it's a surprisingly complicated relationship that Nami and Jinbei have, although you don't pick up on that at all during Hawkeye Island, where the two just seem like good old besties. Absolutely no character could beat three admirals at the same time, not even Roger at his peak. Uh, oh no, this is a dangerous opinion. I mean, it's almost like a whole video topic in and of itself. You know, something click baity like, can one emperor defeat three admirals or the other way around? And without thinking about it too deeply, I'm not actually sure what the outcome would be, because here's the thing. As much as I know that a lot of people might disagree with this thought, the entirety of the marine organization plus the warlords are roughly equal to the power of one emperor of the sea and their extended forces. And the admirals are referred to as the world government's greatest military powers. So could all three of them equate to one Kaido, big mom, white beard or shanks? My answer is maybe, to be honest. Although I do think it's a bit of a stretch to say that absolutely nobody could beat all three of them. Interesting topic though, I might file that away for a future video. Bon Clay should have joined the straw hats. Ah, that is not an unpopular opinion, surely not. He would be such a great addition, especially interacting with Frankie because both he and Bon Clay have the same voice actor, Kazukiya. What powers do milk have? And this, this isn't even an opinion. It's not even a particularly good question. But if I must answer, milk in one piece has magical healing properties that negate the need for dentistry or any kind of bone restoration if you just happen to be a skeleton of some sort, which can happen. Unpopular opinion. The show wasn't any good at all until Beratie or Arlong Park. Hmm, okay. I would be legitimately interested to know if this is actually unpopular. Be honest with me, Grandfleet. How many of you are absolutely in love with One Piece prior to Beratie? Because I can tell you that I definitely wasn't. For most of my One Piece fan career, I've held the belief that it really takes getting to Arlong in order to see the potential of what this series is. Although in my later years, I have been convinced that point is actually Beratie. If you're not convinced by then, then Arlong's probably not gonna help. However, to say it wasn't good at all until then is, well, I definitely disagree. Romance Dawn, Orange Town, and yes, even, Syrup Village all showed great amounts of fun comedy, cool action and surprisingly deep drama.  I felt very little when the Mary died.  But really, look, that's not the first time I've heard this. I mean, personally, I was surprised when a sailing vessel made me shed tears for the first time when I saw it in the manga, but we all get our heartstrings tugged by different things, although I'd be more concerned if nothing at all in One Piece did that to you. Because at that stage, look, you're probably a sociopath. The Auras of Haki is an amazing addition. Ah-ha, so here I think we're referring to the Wano anime and their, well, their very liberal artistic depiction of Haki. Currently, I'm kind of on the sidelines about this myself. On the one hand, I do think it changes the impression of a lot of these Haki scenes and characters look like they're performing much more epic feats than they are in reality. On the other hand, for most of my adult life, I've been complaining that the anime keeps removing things from the manga in order to make the animation transition easier. So when they actually do try to do their own thing and add something through the medium of animation, I think I do fall on the side of supporting it because at least it shows that they have some sort of artistic ambition. Shanks is the final villain, all right? So this is a theory that I must admit I did kind of used to like. Then I stopped and thought about it for like a second. Evil Shanks is a fun idea. I won't deny that. It's just, oh, it would change everything in One Piece. And I really don't think that with the solid connective tissue between Luffy, Roger, and Shanks, that he's going to turn out to be some sort of ultimate antagonist. He was given Roger's straw hat for a reason and therefore Shanks is probably a good boy. Not as good as Chuchu, but well, no one is. The Saga King is an Usopp joke stopped being funny 10 years ago. Ha ha ha, it's so true. All right, here's some behind the scenes information about how my YouTube mind works. If you're in the comments section and you post an Usopp Saga King joke, then that is probably one of the like three things that I will never ever heart or respond to. And exactly why is that? Well, because it's a lazy joke, the joke's been told before. I've been hearing it for quite literally almost 15 years now and I think that we can do better. In fact, I know that we can do better. So maybe let's just try to extend our ambition a bit further into some new meme-y jokes. Whoop Slap is the best character in One Piece. Ah, agreed. So please do vote for my friend, your friend, our friend. Whoop Slap in the world top 100 character poll. I still don't understand why but most of this fan base wanted Vivi to join the crew. She literally offers nothing to the crew. The weakest crew member would be her and I'm not sure she can even deal with any NW fodder. Yeah, I don't know. I think you could have said the same thing about Nami and Usopp during the alabaster days. All Oda has to do is give Vivi her own power up like Usopp's weapons or Nami's climb attack and we're pretty much all good to go. The way women are drawn mostly in the anime is annoying because their proportions are so ridiculous that they don't even look attractive. Hang on a minute. Are you trying to tell me that Planet Tit anime Viola is not attractive? Because you're right. I'm not going to lay the blame entirely on the anime though because Oda's proportions are also wildly unrealistic but the anime does traditionally take it to a whole new level of just weird.  Like it's a one hit KO. Yeah, go to kind of duck himself a bit of a whole with law. There is very, very little reason why he can't do just about anything. The only excuse is haki but that character has to be using haki at the time to stop law and given the ridiculous range of his powers he should be able to do something like take Kaido's heart without the Emperor even noticing that Law is on Onigashima or something along those lines. Law is simply broken and the best Oda can do is kind of just forget to use him. Oda called Buggy Buggy Jiro, second son because Buggy's mama was his side piece. Toki was his one piece. Badum. All right, I think we found what we're looking for. We are done here. And if you'd like to see some more unpopular one piece opinions then please do feel free to check out the unpopular opinions playlist some very spicy stuff over that way. And I look forward to seeing you there.