What's up everyone? Welcome to a new live stream today. I'm gonna get straight into this pretty fast. So some news came out this morning before I go to work and it's just fantastic news. So you guys know that Venom film that everyone's been talking about. You know that pure Venom film that we've all been looking forward to, at least some of us do.  I've had my aspirations. I've been pretty excited for it. But this is gonna be a little bit of a rant. Again, if you're joining this live, thank you so much. I'll be going through what you guys are saying about this film.  But also I want you guys to understand. I want you guys to understand this. If you guys are missing this later, checking it out later. Thanks for watching. It means a ton to me. Comment down below. Tell me what you guys thoughts are on this Venom film. I'm gonna try and keep this pretty short as a discussion, but so let's get into this. So Variety posted something today and my good friend Tyler Tompkins sent this to me and Griffon and so I went and looked it up. And the more I just read more on this, the more I've been pissed off about it. So this is the one part that pisses me off. It's unlikely that Venom will be the first R-rated Sony Marvel movie. Trailers for the film, which recently underwent reshoots in Los Angeles after shooting in Georgia, emphasized the horror movie elements, showing the title's character as he's about to bite a person's head off. But some members of Sony's brain trust believe that the film should push the very limits of PG-13 without crossing over the edge into a higher rating. The feeling is that this will give the studio greater leeway for future installments that will feature Spider-Man, something Venom does not do. Any Spider-Man movie will carry a PG-13 rating because the wall crawler is more family friendly. If Venom is too dark and gory, it might preclude the other film matchups, not just with Peter Parker's alter ego, but also with other members of the extended MCU. Venom is one of the darker characters in the comics, but Harding director Ruben Fletcher are working to inject humor into the story of journalists whose body and mind are taken over by an alien entity. I don't know if this is true, but I'm assuming it is. I remember the last year that came out, I posted and said this film will be PG-13. I don't see it being rated R, but it's gonna end up being PG-13. It'll probably be a hard PG-13, but it will end up being PG-13. We haven't seen a single red band trailer, but we hear all these news of how gory, how bloody this film is gonna be at the Comic-Con and stuff like that, but we haven't gotten any of that in any of the trailers, and I feel like that's Sony finally going back on it. Sony, the reason I remember when Venom got announced, I was very like, why are you doing this? Then you get Tom Hardy, Ruben Fletcher, you get this fantastic cast on board, I'm like, okay, I'm in. Then you kind of, I kind of look at this as being like, oh, it's gonna be an R rated type of Marvel film, because this R rated type of Marvel film tells me, tells me something special. It tells me, number one, that you're gonna try and copy off the Logan and Deadpool-esque thing. This R rated thing is working. It's working perfectly fine. It's working, it's gonna be going in that route, and it's gonna be working that right route. And I look at that and I'm like, that's awesome. You're taking a Logan route. You're taking a character study about a character who can be perfectly used into the MCU. I'm not in the MCU, but this Venom and making a character study about him. And I thought, that is so cool. You're gonna do something awesome with him. The design looks cool. I've liked the design. I didn't like the jokes on the last trailer. The turn of the wind thing, why, why, why? You didn't need that. Like I liked it, but I didn't. The pancreas part didn't bother me. But I've been very, very anticipating this film because Venom's one of my favorite characters in comic book lore. I think he's such a cool character design. I think Eddie Brock is a fantastic, unique character that looks like they're getting a right. You have such a fantastic cast director on board and you had a good premise. But now this film is looking to be a turd in the wind. And I mean that. And I, this is very much dropped a lot of my emphasis. And now don't get me wrong. I don't think this film needs to be rated R. I don't think it needs to be rated R.  You're doing it because you don't even know if Kevin Feige wants this film to MC you. You don't know. So why are you even taking that risk?  Maybe I'll watch the film, maybe Tom Holland shows up and I'm like, okay, it worked. It was good. And maybe I'll be wrong. Maybe in the end of the day the film didn't need to be rated R. Maybe that's just me being my alter ego. But I feel like this is the film that could benefit from a rated R version of it. A Deadpool benefits from it. I've never thought Deadpool should be rated R but when it got the rated R I was like, okay, it benefits it. Now you can't go back. Same with Logan. Once we finally got a rated R Wolverine I'm like, that's awesome. That's the character it benefited from the rated R and it made it best in more visceral. Venom's not one of those characters. It's one of those characters that I do think you need a rated R version of it because the rated R version does help. I think it benefits the character. I think it helps the character a lot. But this is not helping it.  And I mean that. And don't get me wrong. I think Sony has put out some fantastic films. I think Sony has done some great things but this is the same drama we had with the amazing Spider-Man and why that franchise didn't work out. And it's just the same thing. I'm kind of getting Fantastic Four feels for this right now with what Fox did with Fantastic Four.   And you know, we know Sony is making this venom verse in a sense of this venom verse of things where we have Morbius, Jared Leto which it was a cool idea but now I could care less because it's not going to be rated R most likely. Craven, great character. Not going to be rated R, could care less. Black Cat, Silver Sable not having their team up film now. It's just going to say, it's just going to be a typical thing now. It's just going to be just them two. And that's where I'm getting down to this is I get what Sony is doing but I don't think it's good in the long run. You've been placing this marketing as a rated R film in a sense or a very hard R and now you're kind of going to go towards that friendly family thing. Venom is not a family friendly character. He is a hard R or a hard PG-13 but a very visceral character. And it sucks to see that. I thought they were deviating away to go into this more Logan Deadpool route and it's they're not now.   And it's a huge rant on my part because I'm tired of this. I'm tired of Sony not doing this.  We need this. I'm still excited for this film. I will still be their opening day but it's rant. My rant on this is that they're bringing this out. That statement now given that statement is not like directly from a studio rep. This is only stuff that Variety has said. And for all we know this could be completely wrong. Maybe they do end up being it but I do think this film will end up being PG-13. I think what's going to happen with this film is I think there's going to be a definitive purpose because I think Tom Hardy's not happy. I mean Tom Hardy signed on for something that's probably like Logan. I think that's what got Tom Hardy on is after he saw Logan. He was probably like, hey, Radar, I can do this. And I think that Tom Hardy is probably not happy. And there's going to be no disgrace coming out. I think maybe a little bit afterwards but it sucks to see Rubin Flesher kind of getting this. It feels like they're pushing that they have to have humor in this. Because the first two trailers did not have any of that humor in it. The second one kind of brought it in and the first thing, the pancreas, I thought that worked. But the last thing with the turn of the wind just, no. I'm overly mad with this now. And I want to hear your guys thoughts. I see a lot of you guys are in the chat right now talking about this. There is so much stuff going on in this movie news today that just there's so many rants, so many discussions that I could have. And again, I think Sony is a smart studio. I think they've done some pretty damn good things. But just this whole Venom thing is again, one of the issues with them. This is the reason I think Venom should not have been touched because if Venom sucks and they don't introduce it into the MCU, the problem is now we're probably not going to get a Venom in the MCU at all. Because people are going to be, well, confused for the most part. They're going to wait a couple of years and who knows if we'll ever get Venom in there. I think Venom is a good asset. I think he's a good character. I'm praying. I'm hoping. I'm really hoping that this film proves me wrong.  Well, let's go to the comments and see what you guys are saying.  Fronto Jano YG's here. Hello. Jaype Juice. Hi, Zach. By the way, congrats on getting 2K. Thank you so much. NBA 7-3, I'm in Oregon, but I still won't miss your live stream. Thank you. Rhino Tools in here. Devon Pilgrim's in here. He says he needs to be rated R. Tyler Camel, watch there. There will be an unrated cut of Venom on the blue. I don't even care if there is. I won't care.  Heather Gonzalez, Blaine of Diaz, how is it going? I'm pretty mad. Terrence, what's up, man? You're awesome. Thank you so much, man. Five Star, what's up, Zach? Terrence, I'm glad to find your channel. Hey, glad you found it, too. Glad we can have this discussion. Dante Law, it needs to be rated R. Again, I think it does need that rated R, but I think since the marketing's built up, now they're just changing what the film is going to be. I've always thought this could be a hard PG-13. It just would benefit from the R rating. Out of the news trailer, I was excited. Now I'm sad. And yeah, and I am, too. That's kind of how I am. Devon Pilgrim, just by the description, it sounds like it's going to suck, yeah. Hucked and galls, Tater Master. It's got to be serious. Techniclone, PG-13. Why? I wouldn't mind it if it was rated R. It might be a little bit better if it is, but I think it might still be PG-13. I think it will be PG-13. And that's again where I said, I think this film would benefit from a damn R rating. It would help. It would give it that more gritty feel, that verse-rile feel, that Deadpool and Logan carry, especially Logan. I think Venom could have been the Logan of this kind of Marvel cinematic thing, but it just, and I get it, MC doesn't want R rated films. That's completely fine. I do not disgrace Kevin Feige for that because he has a thing going for these. But this is why.  Patrick Kew reminds me of when they made the first AVP PG-13. Yep. The only reason I want to see Venom is for the talent behind it alone. Yeah, and that's what kind of still got me excited for it.  Thank you. Ronald Tull, Tom Hardy will be better as Bane than as Venom, but it still won't be the same guy who fits PG-13. You know what's funny, though? I think Tom Hardy's one of the best actors. I think he's probably going to end up being the probably the best part of the film. I think he's fantastic as Bane. I think he's fantastic as Mad Max. It doesn't matter. The guy always gives 100%. I don't think Venom should have a cussing or sex, but it should have go on board. That's what I think it should have. I don't think there should be cussing. I don't think there should be sex. It's not needed.  There's certain films I do think benefit from it, but mostly the time is that. Cussing, it kind of depends on what they're emphasizing on it, but yeah. I will still see Venom no matter what the rating is. Yeah, same here. Um, Anthony Jenkins, now I've lost film face in this film. I think a lot of us have members movies in here. Speaking of rants, we need to rant about the effing Oscar changes. Yeah, I'm with you.  Another thing to grow, grow about technical hope. It's fake, but since shadows aren't bloody, well, there goes my excitement. See, but no one's really complained about the bloody. Everyone just expected this for this film to be rated R and I haven't ever since I haven't seen a red band. I agree with you. I really love the Venom verse comic. So hope Sony doesn't screw it up. Will it be better than Suicide Squad or will it be worse than Fantastic Four? Okay, I don't think it'll be worse than Fantastic Four. And I do think it'll probably end up being better than Suicide Squad. Honestly, if this film is not going to have that, this is what I want from it straight up to be. And I think this is all whatever one should want. It's just a good movie, a good movie with a good story and a good decent plot that has these horror tones that has this action that's entertaining and fun. If it has those elements, if it's still a good story and it still works on all those aspects, then I will be fine with this film. I will be completely fine with this film. But hearing about this, hearing about these last minute things just makes me have Suicide Squad and Fantastic Four Routes. Austin Birch, Deadpool did benefit from being an RA, same as Logan, but they didn't have to be rated R. The Dark Knight proves that you can make a very gritty PG-13 movie look great. And that is true, that is very true. Like I said, Venom could still turn out to be great. If it's PG-13 or R rated, but as long as it has a good story and a good element and it has those good acting moments, I think that's what I can still appreciate from this film. That's where I'll still give the saving grace to this movie overall, if it has all that. But I'm not hearing that right now. Tyler Calvas, Disney wants the MCU to get some Oscars. So let's make some new language, excuse me for some language, or wait, let's make new categories. My internet is acting ratchet for some reason, blah, blah. It's a good category. It looks like a lot of you guys talking about the Oscars. Terence, you're awesome and I love your channel. Thank you so much, man, for loving my channel. I love you for watching this. But yeah, that's my rant. This was pretty short. I want to give my rant and inform you guys if you have not heard about this yet. But I just, I'm gonna live the saving grace to this. Please, Sony, if you were listening, this is a call to you. Please do what's best for this film. I am hoping that you guys have made a good movie and that you guys have a good story and maybe you just want to open it up to a wider audience. I can get that. I still think you should take the risk with it being R. And this film is still going to open well.  All that's gone. You won't be able to make it anymore.  No need to. We won't get our carnage because I know carnage's supposed to be in here but it'd probably be a cameo, which is fine. But yeah, that's where I'm gonna leave it. Again, I think you guys should look into this. The film does not need to be rated R. And that we should just hope for a good movie. But this exact comment, it's unlikely that Venom will be the first R rated thing. I'm going to read this one more time before I go. It's unlikely that Venom will be the first R rated Sony Marvel movie trailers for the film which recently underwent reshoots in Los Angeles after shooting in Georgia, emphasized the horror movie Elements, showing the title character as he's about to bite a person's head off. But some members of Sony's brain chefs believe that the film should push the very limits of PG-13 without crossing over into a higher rating. The feeling is that this will give the studio a greater leeway for future installments that will feed your Spider-Man something Venom does not do. Any Spider-Man movie will carry a PG-13 reign because the wall crawler is more family-friendly and if Venom is too dark and gory, it might preclude other film matchups, not just with Peter Parker's alter ego, but also with other members of the extended Marvel Cinematic Universe, the MCU. Venom is one of the darker characters in the comics but Hardy and director Rupert Fletcher are working to inject humor into the story of a journalist whose body and mind are taken over by an alien entity. Why? That's where I think this should start at and that's where I'm going to leave it at. So guys, if you tune in later, hit that comment down below, tell me what your guys thoughts are on this. Please, taking the consideration again, like I said, if this is still a good film, maybe we'll all be eating our words that this didn't need to be radar yada, yada, yada. But again, after all the marketing, after all the talk, after the announcement of when this film came out, I wanted that. I see the humor. I don't think the humor's gonna be good. I think the humor's gonna be feel like, I feel like the humor's gonna have some good placements and some not because this have Rupert Fletcher. He did a really good job of zombie land but I am hoping it's humor that's not forced. I hope we get a good story and I hope just in the end of the day, this is a good film. But again, I can't wait to hear you guys' thoughts on this. So of course guys, hit that like button, hit that subscribe button if you're new. Tell me your thoughts on Venom. Thank you guys so much for watching. I love and appreciate each and every one of you guys in a course. Until next time, stay classy. You guys all have a great rest of your day.


All right, if anyone can hear me on Discord, let me know.  Hehehehe Hello everyone and welcome to another episode of Jurassic World the Game. The game that keeps on giving, isn't that right? Oh, no, that wasn't the right one. Yeah, there it is, although maybe the other one's more preferable. I don't know. Anyway, so I just recorded a video and accidentally had it play through Discord. So luckily, no one- there was only a few people on Discord because I was just in general voice chat, just doing this. Hehehehe Well, anyway, here we are on Jurassic World the Game. The game is now officially, I think, seven years old. Oh my god, I've been playing this game for seven years. Midlife Crisis. Hehehehe But we're here because we have two announcements to make. Actually, we have a new hybrid and not only that, we have a new dinosaur coming to the game. I don't know when it's coming. I don't know if it's gonna be a toilet creature, they usually are. Or if it's gonna be VIP, VIP would be nice. It would also be nice to have some VIP rewards. Ludia, looking at you babes, mwah. Hehehehe Okay, well, let's look at the lottery. Did we win anything? Uh, well, we've- apparently we've- we've got something. Is it good? We got one of- oh, we got an earlichosaurus. I guess it's not that bad. Uh, what else have we got? I've got my food. Oh, stick in a rare. Stick in a rare? Why not? Right, so we're gonna go to our daily duty, see if there's anything good. I've slowly been, you know, working my way back to getting some... books, but it's- Oh my God, guys, it's so- it's hard. It's hard. It's hard. It's so hard to get books because the game just doesn't want to give it to you. No, don't- don't want it. You don't want- you don't want books. Don't- don't- don't lie. Uh, so what have we got? Anything good? Ooh. Blah-blah-blah-blah-blah-blah. Here we go to- I guess that's not so bad. You know, if it's- if I can trade anything for books, I'll do it. Uh, let's see what decorations we've got. We've got 19 John Hammons, where we trade us VIP. So, basically we've just got VIP points that we lost from trading the books. So we basically got books for free, technically. We're on a plus, and then we have to use 50 books to keep on refreshing this, because I think it works out if you keep on doing this. Hopefully, we get something for coin. That's not bad. Okay, so we're at 50 bucks, even though we refreshed it and ate that- Oh, somebody said I could max up! Oh, what is it? The Scorpius Rex? I didn't realize, but we can do that. So, you know, we'll try to John Hammond statue, yeah, sure. Because I think the main reason I didn't max up Scorpius Rex in, you know, when we unlocked it, was because... It was bloody hard and it took so much food to feed. Uh... Yeah... Yeah, give me that. So, I've also done an impromptu thing on my Discord. So, you can find the Discord in the link in the description below, where I was, like, on the stage and I asked questions and I invited people on the stage and... I think it was fun. Well, I had fun. So, there's a lot in the description, there's loads. You go to the description, you can get special links to resources in this game. You can get some advanced GG fuel, you can also get hoodies and the Discord and all the social medias and stuff like that, where you may interact with me, if you're lucky. I might not like you though. How'd it go, eh? Right, okay, anything good here? Nah, but I think we're up on books, even though we had to spend some to get some. That's the way it goes. That's the way the cookie crumbles. So, a mission is to place a newly hatched T-Rex, so maybe, you know what, I should probably put a T-Rex into one of these.  And if we go down, it should be, there it is. Okay, so we're gonna put it in, just leave it, why not? I didn't realise that was a mission. Why do I do the missions? When we've already maxed up to level 99? You might get something good, it's coin, right now, but it might be something better later. Hey, don't you love this game? So, the new, um, hybrid in here. I think it is the Rhino Proton, Rhino Protodon. Oh, we don't have Deprotodon. Oh, interesting, this must be a new one.  So, we need seven more of these guys. We do have one, we can instant hatch for 100, but we can only do that four times. Um, and you know what? I love you guys. It kills me, but we'll do it, we'll do it. So, we'll just keep on doing that. So, 3,000, instant hatch for 100. How much is it to instant hatch normally? Oh, 600, oh my god, maybe we won't be able to do it. Three, four, and then five. Did it always cost 600 fricking bucks to speed up a legendary? It's news to me, good lord. Uh, okay, so that's five, we need three more. So, that is 1,800 bucks. And that's not including the books we need to speed up. So, 10 for that, oh, it's 500, okay. Okay, it's a little bit better than a T-Rex. So, two left, there's one, incubate for 10, uh-huh. Oh, don't you love this game, it's beautiful. Beautiful, I can't instant hatch the hybrid, but I don't think I need to instant hatch it because it's in the test tube, I think. Right? I think it is. All right. 10, 10, 10, 10. I mean, who might as well instant fuse it? Oh, he's so small. It's so tiny, it looks way bigger than that. Why is it so small?  It's very clever. Instant fuse, yes. Oh, we got a code 19. Somebody's got the Rhona in the pack. Instant fuse, baby. Level 11. Yes, thank you. And then this. If I wish I'd known what it took to make the hybrid, otherwise I would have done it. I saw that it was the Rhino, and I was like, oh, do I, well, you know, because I guessed it was the Rhino, because it looked like the Rhino. And it was the Rhino, but I didn't know what else the other ingredient was. So, is that still 160? I think it was. 20. And a 20. And a 30. And the thing is right, this is one of the rare cases where the hybrid we make is actually really, really bad. So thank you, then. So we'll make that, there we go. Another instant fuse, 180.   Oh, okay. So at level 40, it has 1,226 health and 383 attack, which, you know, for a normal legendary, I guess isn't that bad. So let's just collect all of this and get some books back, good lord. And let's do this, because it's bugging me with the noise in the background. Yeah! Alright, Kool-Aid, here we go. One, two, three. Yeah, yeah. That did a number in my voice. I really shouldn't have done that. I just spent like an hour in Discord chatting with people and it's completely killed. Oh, but it was fun. It was fun. It definitely helped probably do that. I'd like to do that and stream or something like that. That'd be a good idea. The people could join the Discord and then also, like, have a voice. We should do that. Oh, that'd be so good, yes. Oh, oh, thank you, thank you. Okay, because we need to code 19 in order to get more SuperDNA or BossDNA, sorry. Ooh, a Ramferinkus. Is this a rare? I think it's a rare. Oh, what's... Is it a movie? There's something where... It's Kong. It's not the first time. I think they've done like a flying creature with a beak that could slice people. But it's Kong's Skull Island with the flying things with the razor beaks. Yeah, it looks like this, that's interesting. Astute observation there, beavers. Yes. 40. Yeah, what we'll do, because I need to do a Primal College live stream at some point in the near future in the next couple of days. I think what we should do at the end of it is everybody come into Discord and then we can do like a rapid fire thingy at the end. That'd be quite fun. Oh my God, I'm getting all of it. You know what, I'll take it. I'll happily take it. Super Creatures are really good. So nostalgic. Natsukashi. Seeing this Spinosaur. God, remember when I first level like maxed up Spinosaur? This thing looks insane, it's so cool. And it does, it looks really cool. The thing is, I mean if I was head of, you know, because it was Hasbro at the time, wasn't it? Hasbro had the license to the toys and such. And it wasn't until quite far on into oh my God, we're getting more. Far on to the lifespan. Oh, this is the new flyer. So maybe we'll get lots of DNA for this. Into the lifespan of this game that they decided to release toys of the dinosaurs in here. So you had a Dominus Rex that was level 40. I think even Spinosaur, like that Spinosaur had a figure released. They just took the original mold and put like the colorings on. So they didn't really change much. And I think there was like a, there was a hybrid like the Delofosaurus T-Rex hybrid which wasn't even in the game, but they were like ah, I saw the T-Rex Delofosaurus that'll make money. And it was the most horrific hideous looking dinosaur toy I've ever seen. It were horrible. Alright, here we go. 25. Oh, I love it. Love it, love it, love it. Yes. Yes. Okay, is that it, Todd? Oh, I can rest. Thank you. Thanks, Gabe. But I did also, oh, look at all those. Oh, yes. So, I mean, we got 24 hours to fuse two herbivores, open six packs which we could definitely do. Open 15 packs, which I'm definitely not gonna do. And I could use carnivores if I wanted to, but yeah. I'm alright. I saw what we got. We were in the midst of what's this? Don't know. It's a random village. Oh, this is where I have all my trophies. Yeah. Oh, there's the Brachiosaurus. I don't know what that is. Brachiosaurus sculpture. What was it used for? I don't know. So yes, the new dinosaur. And then we got like a triceratops exhibit which is, of course, Fallen Kingdom. If we go into news, gyrosphere diorama loyalty points. Ooh. Did I? Oh, did that come with it? Oh. Okay, brilliant. Also, I think I might miss something. Uh, oh, a news letter. First time subscribers will receive a 300 in-game cash. I think there's also something, there's an email. I don't know whether it's just well live or just well the game where if you click on it, you get 200 bucks. So, don't forget that. Check your emails. Also, link in the description below to get more resources. Hey! So, this is the new creature. A crowned creature. This beast is waiting to show off his crest. His? Not hers. Oh. So, it looks like a Sinsatosaurus. And I think we have Sinsato in Jurassic World alive. And it's a more recent addition to the game. But we are here for the hybrid as well. So, let's see. Where are you? So, we got one instant fuse. Instant fuse. Heck yeah. So, there. And we have another Cod19. So, this thing. Now, if you remember, it was like 1,300 health. 500 attack ish. And level 1 269 health. And 103 damage. And oh my god this. Nightmare. It is the weirdest thing. I have seen it a long time. And I've seen some weird things from Ludia. The mammoths in Sato Hybrid being one of them.  But this thing takes the cake for one of the derpiest and just out of place looking creatures in the game. It looks like something that would have appeared in a 90's puppet animation.  Like you had puppeteers and people in costumes. It looks like something that would be in one of those movies. Or like an early Godzilla monster. Because when you see it from its front it doesn't look good. Hey but we're getting free DNA. I'm happy with that. I'm free super DNA. Don't mean to toot my own horn but that was a lot of DNA. 680. Right is that we done? We're done? Thank you. Okay god. Well let's go over here. Where are we? Let's have a look at you. Let's have a look at you. Look at that face. Look at that. Look at that. Look that in the eye and tell me that's not creepy. He's got a bowl cut. Why does it have a bowl cut? Okay. Oh it fishes the same at level 10. Bear in mind level 10 are supposed to be on par if not a little bit better than their previous components put together. But for whatever reason this thing is 404 health and 154 attack. And this is a legendary hybrid. How do you do this little deer? Please answer me. I have no idea how you keep making these same mistakes. It's crazy. It really is. I have no idea how much does one cost? 57000. Level 40 it's got like 100 extra health and 30 extra attack. How? How does that work? I mean compare it to something cheaper. 7000 DNA cheaper. Mammotherium Why? It's so weird. It has 3 times more attack. And should we just say what like 6 times more health? I haven't run the math but like 5 or 6 times more health. It's ridiculous. I do not understand why 4 or 5 times semantics. So obviously this thing is going to be changed right? It has to be it has to be. So let's have a look or do we have anything interesting? Jarrus Fears are never worth it because they cost books to enter. This however is because a rare pack is one of the packs that actually gives you a fair chance of getting books. PvP nothing he need. Boss events. Ooh ooh my. I don't think they're really that worth it though even if you do win a domination rewards pack. It's just DNA. And the entry is 30 books and you need to do that 2 times. So 60 books for DNA all the way around please. I'll do it. I'll take like 5000 DNA to enter to win so many books. Maybe 100. 200 bucks. I'll do that. I would generally play the game more if it was the other way around. But Lydia doesn't want to. What was that move? I don't know. It's me being frustrated with Lydia. Right let's go to ball stage infinite. This was a toughie. I tried this before and it died. Why? Because I have no good fricking amphibians. As you can see my top dinosaur Carnival. Carnival. Herbival? Carnival. Flyer? Herbival? Carnival. Oh yes Scorpius Rex where are you? Where are you Scorpius Rex? It's gotta be here. No that's Indoraptor right? That's Indoraptor. Where's Scorpius? Scorpius you gotta be here. You gotta I think you're in here somewhere. You've gotta be. Right? No. Alright well we're gonna have to do it the the hard way. We're gonna have to go in here to open super hybrids. No Scorpius? Wait Scorpius Rex is not a super hybrid. Is it just a regular carnival? It must be. Okay okay okay. Scorpius. There it is. Where are you? Where are you Scorpius? Oh I don't get to find out. Oh my god it's 4 million a pop! Woo! Oh one, two, three, and six Jesus! Okay let's watch the final animation we'll ever see of Scorpius Rex going into its max level 9,359 health and 3,957 attack! Oh lordy! Oh my god maybe this is the best creature now I've got. Wow! Oh there you are. You're over there chilling with the big guys. The big boys. Alright now let's see in the roster where'd you stack up? Oh! I think it's just got better than uh Draco seratops. It's got more attack, a tiny bit less health to be fair I'd rather have 600 extra attack than 700 extra health makes more sense. Okay so it's one two three four five it's the sixth strongest dinosaur in the game however for this matchup it is not.  I probably don't want to lose Gorgogo 1, 2, 3 ok so he's got one block he's got one block yeah I need to kill him I need to kill him here so 1, 2, 3 4 and then that now worst case scenario he goes for a reserve if he goes for a reserve it can kill me no matter what so it's whether or not I factor that in and just go for 3 reserves and even if he does and he goes for at least then Ostaposaurus comes in with 7 and they have nothing however if I go for 3 block and he's got a reserve it's wasted so in theory it's actually better for me to go for reserves than to block but if he doesn't go for reserve and he goes for a block I've survived and kept Indoraptor for another turn you feel me? but I'll risk it ah so that's unfortunate because now I might die if I went for 4, sorry 3 block I wouldn't have died oh sorry if I wouldn't have died there but I did die but good news is that he has nothing right so I have to do this the problem is Giganotosaurus has 22,000 health and I only have 3,000 at attack so 3 6 9 1,200 I die in one hit so it's a case of if I round up 3,000 attack 3, 6, 9 in 4 hits I do 1,200 but then we have to factor in the extra hits so I think because I can't put in 4 and then take out I have to guess if I put in 1 I've lost I need to go all out here so I think if I put in 4 it's going to be just shy I think it's going to be just shy because that is an extra 10,000 damage that I don't think I'm going to get from 4 attacks if I had 5 maybe 10,000 plausible but the thing is there's nothing I can do here if I risk it and go for 3 reserve sorry 1 reserve 3 block and he goes to 4 I'm dead so 1, 2, go shy I would have won there if I had switched around Gorgasuchus and the other and the Ostiposaurus would have had like 3,000 extra and I would have killed it I would have killed it so what we're going to do we're going to use our instant recoveries and I'm going to hope that we can repeat that or or what I do is I put in something that if I put in our matter then Indoraptor and then Gorgasuchus that way he even might waste a swap in for over codon if he does I die in one hit so actually that's not worth it I think what I need to do is still you don't my safest bet honestly there's no point in putting in Pachigalosaurus because I think Pachigalosaurus will die in two hits still and it'll have like 1,050 attack which is nothing at least with Udon I have 1,600 ish so 1,800 attack which is more than 1,050 so fingers crossed oh come on please please we can do this come on Udon I have to go for one block I just have to do it has to be done please go for 2 attack please okay 2 reserve okay he's kill me I think he might not he might not because 2 hits have to kill me and I might block for 2 yes oh this is we got lucky we got so lucky there so he's got 5? he's got 5 okay please go for 5 go for 5 I will kiss you okay he's got one block we're in the same situation as before but better because I got 8 now so now I know for a fact I can kill him so that's killed him I can factor in 1 and then make sure that Indoraptor survives right? yes yes oh we survived oh my god we're gonna do it 1 2 and then 2 reserves yes I think we've done it I think we've legit done it I've been stuck on this level for so long and I think I've just done it okay so he's got one block but we've got 5 and we saw that 4 almost killed it and now we've got an extra like 1000 attacks 1 2 3 4 oh yes we killed him if I'd swapped those 2 Gorgor would have killed him but anyway here we go even with the one block 5 does an extra almost 10,000 damage a target of 5 attack would do 10,000 damage and there it is we did it we need uh where is it and did we get books is the question oh we got 2 books yes 2 hundo it's been good it's been a good one we got 200 books we've unlocked a new uh hybrid which is crap but you know and we did the final thing that I was stuck on for ages uh can we claim something oh we open more card packs sweet well anyway guys if you enjoyed this video leave a like until next time I'll see you beaver babies later oh bye bye


Holy heck, we just got out of the Sydney premiere of the mummy. It is the first in the monster cinematic universe from universal The dark universe. Yes, the dark universe. The dark universe. How crazy is that? Crazy. They have it's own universal logo But it's called the dark universe. Yeah, I'm Ryan. I'm Dres. And this is a review for the mummy. Show me the mummy Every week so is it any good is giving you a chance to win an exclusive Funko Pop vinyl To get your hands on this awesome prize. Just subscribe to the channel and comment below with literally anything We will announce the winner in the next review So let's talk about the dark universe a shared cinematic universe of classic movie monsters While at least four more movie monster reboots have already been planned Universal has announced two new monsters to be added to the roster And the mummy is the first in the dark universe Which takes the studio's classic movie monsters that were popularized in black and white film and Reintroduces them for the new generation from there the shared universe will only expand with Bill Condon's brighter Frankenstein starring Javier Bardem as Frankenstein's monster slated to be released next Sometime after that Johnny Depp will debut as the invisible man The studio also has reboots planned for Van Helsing the wolf man and creature from the black lagoon With the current resurgence of the universal monster franchise coming to life in 2017 the big question that is looming for all of us 80s babies Will we get a revamped version of the monster squad? Will it be kids or adults taken on these horror icons in sort of a mashed up universe? Let's talk about the movie more the mummy stars Tom Cruise as Nick He basically is the internet Jones in the modern day He uncovers an ancient princess that's been locked away in a tomb accidentally and sets her upon the earth Reaking havoc killing people making zombies out of people sucking their body life out of them for good and making them no more It also stars Annabelle Wallace. It also stars Jake Johnson. It also stars Russell Crowe in a very memorable role for him Dr. Jekyll Dr. Jekyll very cool. Mr. Hyde or Mr. Hyde This is the beginning of the Universal monster movie series and it's and it's almost thrown at you in this film It's mentioned a lot when they don't directly mention as Universal monster movies But they tell you about monsters that have been happening around earth So there's been three trailers for this movie and not one of them has kind of made me interested in the film I kind of went in this film with very very low expectations I mean the trailer themselves we saw Tom Cruise audibly screaming a lot probably wanting running away from the camera as he does Did you see one of the trailers? I went in cold to this movie I wanted to experience Tom Cruise in the universal monster universe the mummy. I love horror I love monsters.  No scares to me at all.  This was pretty good man. The sound was pretty good Scary probably not. No, you saw the zombie films, but was it incredible? Yeah, the CGI was pretty awesome. Yeah, well, that was what scared me the zombies kind of coming out of nowhere But that you know, that's another part of the film we don't want to go too much into spoiler territory Why can't we oh because we don't know why we won't Sophia Patella. She plays the mummy in this movie She is really powerful. She's a witch in some sort of senses But she's also incredibly attractive.  She turned them into the undead the zombies. Yeah, and the noises the sound effects were incredible Yeah, I just couldn't get over it. What about Russell Crowe in this man He plays an English Dr. Jekyll Terrible English actor in this film That's not a ship on a Barbie. Come on mate. Let's have a baby, you know, he's like halfway through the movie He's Australian that he's English and then he kind of has an American accent with a fuckers Russell Crowe in this movie from But it's good old rusty. He's not really trying anymore is he's kind of giving up He's put on weight. He's smashed a lot of babies. Oh You know what for me? He's not really trying anymore I do believe him when he's when he's Dr. Jekyll and when he transformed into Mr. Hyde. Oh my god So what the hell was your favorite bit? When Russell Crowe transformed from Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde And the fight sequence after I will not spoil it, but it was Yeah, fair enough. I would agree with that. That was pretty cool What was your favorite? I really enjoyed the opening sequences of the movie set in Egypt With Sophie Battella and her storyline of where how she became the mummy or you know her which Person that she is in that film You know, I really enjoyed that. I really enjoyed seeing the ancient Egypt stuff. That was really cool It was very akin to the original mummy film that sequence But after that we didn't really see much of you know, the origin story is pretty cool, man Yeah, yeah, that's what I was and it showed a lot. Yeah as well. You got to see the entire back story of her Yep. So what was your worst bit about the movie then? I love Tom Cruise. I felt like he was overacting a little bit Okay, just a little bit some of the things when you're really looking at it the stumbling that his expressions the way he's interacting Maybe we do it too much, but I could see that he was just a little bit overacting But it doesn't take away from the film. Okay. My worst bit was the flashbacks There was a lot of flashbacks like he's so we're stuck with Tom Cruise He's having a conversation with Jenny and all of a sudden he's getting flashback into these different sequences that haven't happened to him yet But we're kind of learning about it just happens so often that it just takes you out of the film But then also the second worst bit was the damn women next to me texting on the phone halfway through the film You're a Sydney premier Tom fucking cruises in the cinema and you are texting Don't text should be against the law from big brother though. I know they weren't from anything They even if they are from big brother, they are from nothing They are nothing. They mean nothing to me. I mean nothing to anybody in this world.  There's a lot of universes happening What do you think of the first film? Okay, starting off with the mummy I probably would have gone creature from the black lagoon. They've overdone Frankenstein werewolf and Dracula We're expecting a Brendan Fraser type movie, which it isn't it's Tom Cruise straight down the line Probably would have gone creature, but the mummy's pretty cool. I gotta admit like it works Yeah, okay creature mummy then werewolf Frankenstein and Dracula was Dracula's has been overdone with vampires Yeah, sure And they've tried Dracula Dracula and told was meant to be the first universal film But it didn't work out for them now. That's kaput. They tried with the wolf man also kaput I'm still hoping for it all leads into the monster squad because that would be a badass movie But overall Yeah, I mean it's cool and all but it didn't feel like it was the beginning of a cinematic universe Like there were little hints and drabs throughout obviously dr. Dr Jekyll and mr. Hyde and the mummy of course, but it didn't feel like a universe You know how like Marvel has their superheroes and it it feels like it feels like its own realm This kind of just felt like an average modern day telling of the mummy But yeah, it didn't have any you know oomph to it didn't have any grounding or I don't know for me Anyway, but there's a lot of action in this movie. There's a lot of suspense. There's a lot of horror There's a lot of gore. There's a lot to love here, but Is it a yes? Is it a no? So is it any good? What is your verdict? So is it any good? Yes, but no. Oh, yes, but no my first time I'm gonna say this I enjoyed it I will watch it again, but I will not race out the cinemas to see it or will I race out to get a blu-ray or dvd Was suspenseful there was horror. I love universal monsters Never ages why I Don't know I'm not gonna go into that But I think the best thing about this was getting to see Tom Cruise and Russell Crowe Fair enough in the fair enough movie was good. Yeah, I think it can lead on to a franchise I think they should have showed more. Yep. I am also gonna give it a yes Just because I think you should go check it out But do I think it's a great movie not at all. Do I think it's a good movie? It's almost a good movie. There's a little bit too much or not enough going on in the second act for me The first and third act are amazing. I wanted a little bit more out of the mummy in this film And we got a little bit too much maybe of Russell Crowe and Just give me more. I'll go see more of these movies. So keep making them universal That's a yes from me. It's a yes from you. Yeah. Yeah, I'm Ryan from soul is any good I'm drys and this is our review from the mummy and until next time. Hopefully we'll see you at the cinema


If you want to know how quickly groups in your organization adopt DevOps features, or quickly identify and help other groups in your team to adopt DevOps processes, and overall get a panoramic view of your DevOps journey, GitLab DevOps adoption charts can help you with that. My name is William, and I am a technical marketing manager here at GitLab. I will show you today how and where to find your DevOps adoption information. Here I have my group, DevOps Platform. I can see it contains different projects. Within this group, DevOps Platform going to analytics and clicking on DevOps adoption will take me to this page where I can see the feature adoption throughout time. For example, in this group DevOps Platform, we have enabled all of the essential GitLab features in our DevOps journey. They are breaking down in dev, second ops, and as we can see here in the adoption over time, from October to November, we increased the adoption by enabling DAST. I can quickly get information of the progress of my DevOps journey using GitLab. And at the higher level, in this other group tech marketing, and if we repeat the same steps and we go to the DevOps adoption, we can see and compare the different features that have been enabled across the different groups. When managing groups in the UI, you can add or remove your subgroups, identify specific subgroups that are lagging in their adoption of GitLab, so you can help them alone in their DevOps journey. Having this panoramic view where we can compare different subgroups and their adoption of the different DevOps processes can quickly give us information and probably learn from other subgroups, learn how they are using the different DevOps processes or features that we can compare some have enabled and some others don't. With DevOps adoption, you can verify whether you are getting the return of investment that you expect from GitLab. Thanks for watching and let's continue learning at GitLab.


What's up guys my guru jasps doing a quick recap for 2023 tops pristine A box case break pick your team number four was done on fanatics live Here's the list in case you forgot and Getting into it long long recap here So kind of Nolan Gorman to 25 They kind of fly through some of this stuff stop for the Really nice stuff phone nailer to 25 Guard a 75 Christopher morale gold that one's out of 50 Pools to 75. Nolan Gorman again. This one's to 75 arocks in 99 rally green refractor Gunner Henderson fresh faces to 75 Buxton see for all right now the relic autos had a Patrick wisdom Popular demand Byron Buxton Jesse Winker bat relic and auto Walker Bueller Alec Munoz Tiosca Hernandez gold out of 50 Nika Horner gold out of 50 as well Tony Gonslin Looks like some more pillows here Reggie Jackson gold and a Zach police act All right now into the encased cards. We've got a lot of them Jeter Downs auto Gold Mario on a river out of 50 maize James Altman. I think this one might be numbered. Yep out of 99 for the Dodgers jock Byron Buxton auto over Thompson a 75 Had a gold Corey Segar Otto to 50 Shane McClanahan to 15 Bellinger to a JJ Bleday gold Oscar Gonzalez auto Max Castillo auto Gold Marta last stack here Nelson Velasquez auto another one Tristan Cosas auto leave that one is numbered to 99 Killian and oh snap auto a Byron Buxton Corey Lee auto. Oh snap William McCovey gold Jackie Robinson blue Grissom auto Hayden was Neske that is red five of five for the Cubs sandy Alcantara Had a Corbin Carroll sonar Josh young auto that one is to 99 Soto auto Matsui gold fingers Jermaine Palacios and the last card of the break a carry carpenter black one of one rookie auto for the Tigers Sick card there And yeah, it was a full case break pick your team. So thank you to everyone who got in And yeah, thanks for watching. We'll see you guys in the next one. Bye guys


Hi, I'm Zor. Welcome to Unisor Education. Today we will talk about very important geometrical property of triangles about triangles being congruent. Now this course, this lecture actually is part of the course called Math Plus and Problems, which is on Unisor.com. I suggest you to watch this lecture from Unisor.com website because every lecture including this one has very important notes, which basically are like a good textbook, very very detailed. Then there is a prerequisite course in the same website. It's called Maths for Teens, which basically is the foundation of school mathematics, high school mathematics, algebra, geometry, logic, combinatorics, etc. All the topics actually. So this particular course, Math Plus and Problems, is a continuation in in certain respect. It's not about standard problems, which basically are checking if you have correctly mastered the theory. These are problems, mostly problems, which are not exactly standard. They are forcing you to think about to be creative, to find out something which is not exactly within the framework of whatever you have been taught. So that's the purpose of the whole course and in this particular case we will talk about one particular problem of geometry. Geometry of triangles when triangles are congruent to each other. Now let's talk about congruency, geometrical figures. What is congruent? Basically congruent means that you have two geometrical figures. Let's say it's on the plane. So you have, let's say, two triangles. You have this triangle and you have this triangle. We are talking about congruency in what kind of respect? Well, we are talking about process of transformation of one into another when they will completely coincide. Now, what kind of transformation do we allow to call these triangles congruent? Well, first of all, it's translation, which means we're just shifting the whole thing along some line, straight line. Then it's rotation because we can actually rotate and they still be, they will still be congruent in our in our sense, in our definition of congruency. And they can be symmetrically reflected along some kind of line. So these three components of general transformation are allowed to be used to make these two figures coincide and if using one of the or three of them in some combination, these transformation, if we can make these two coincide, then we can say that these geometrical figures are congruent. In all times, actually, we used the word equal. Now it's more traditional to call them congruent. Equal means that the lengths of the each site in this in this particular case corresponding site is equal. Now now let's talk about something which is closer to problem at hand. Now when two triangles can be congruent to each other. Now, regular course of geometry actually we used side-side-side, which means three sides of one are of the same lengths as three sides of another triangle. The corresponding sides are supposed to be equal lengths. Now there is a side angle side. So we have two sides of equal lengths and the angle in between them of one triangle correspondingly equal to another. And we have angle side angle. So we have in this case all three. In this case two and angle. In this case, it's line and two angles are equal to each other. Okay, so it makes an impression that you see three elements of a triangle are sufficient to be correspondingly equal to have triangles congruent to each other. Is it any three elements? Can I say, let's say instead of side angle side, I can put side-side angle. Which means side and then side and this angle. Like this, something like this. Is it also a good theorem to prove that triangles which have two sides and angle not in between them, but they're supposed to be congruent triangle. Or some other combination, whatever is not covered by these three. Well, the answer is no. So this is not the right theory. Now angle, angle, angle. This is obviously not the right one because you can just enlarge triangle, scale it. So the new triangle will be similar to the original one. With three angles equal, but sides be proportionally bigger. So also not good. So my point is that these are the good theorems and general theorem about, okay, let's say just any three elements and it will be equal. Now that's not true. More than that. What I will prove is that you have, you can have two sides and all three angles of one triangle be equal to two sides and three angles of another triangle and triangles be completely different. Non-congrant. And that's the purpose of this particular lecture. Okay, so let's do it now. I will suggest to you exactly an example when two sides and three angles are not sufficient to be equal between two triangles for these triangles to be congruent. Here's an example. So let's draw something like this. This would be my A, B and C somewhere here. Now, I will put D, E in such a way that A, C is equal to C, E and D, E this one is equal to BC. So let's assume that I can build such a triangle. Now as you see triangles are obviously similar. D, E is parallel to this one. So all angles are the same. This is common and this is obviously equal to this. This is equal to this. Now speaking about symbols, I'm usually preferring to call the side which is across the capital letter, let's say D, lower case B. Now, I will have it for a bigger triangle. So a bigger triangle will be with index one. Across A will be A1 and across C will be C1. Now inside C, E as I said by definition by my construction is supposed to be equal to A, C. So C, E would be B also B because they are equal but I will put index two and D, E again, I assume that I can construct such a way that D, E is equal to BC. It would be A 2, A because it's equal to this, A but 2 because it's a smaller triangle. And this one whatever it happens to be, I will put X on it. So I assume that this triangle is two triangles actually are constructed as I said. So A1 is equal to A2 and B1 is equal to B2. Now, A, C is actually B1 and D, E is equal to A1. Now, so I assume that I can construct this triangle with these properties. Now, if I can and I will prove that I can, so if I can, what follows from here? Because if I can construct it, I already have two sides are equal to each other. This one is equal to this and this one is equal to this, the big one, A, C to C, E. All angles are obviously equal, so we have five elements of one triangle equal to five elements of another triangle. Not exactly correspondingly, so the angle is not in between equal sides, etc. But nevertheless, my point was that you can specify five equal elements of one and five equal to corresponding elements of another and still triangles will be different in this case. Okay, so what I will do is I will start constructing certain equations based on similarity of these two triangles. Now, they're obviously similar because I'm assuming that the E is parallel. So all angles are the same, so they're similar. Now, in similar triangles, now I will have the ratio of corresponding sides. Let's say X, which is CD to AC, which is B1 supposed to be equal to this to this, A2 to C1, and this smaller one is B2 to A1. Now, from this pair, we have X is equal to A2, sorry, A2B1 divided by A1, sorry, C1, C2, C1. From this one, the same X is equal to B1 times B2 divided by A1. Okay, now I'm interested in this. So B1 can be cancelled to each other and I will have A2 divided by C1 is equal to B2 divided by A1. But let's not forget that instead of A2, I can put A1. Instead of B2, I can put B1 because I assume that this is equal. That's how I actually made it from which follows that A1 square is equal to B1 times C1. So the A is supposed to be A is supposed to be in between B and C to satisfy this. So B is the smallest one, C is the biggest one, the biggest side, and A1 is supposed to be the middle one in between. So from existence of this these two triangles built the way how I did follows this particular equation which the sides are supposed to satisfy. So this is a necessary condition for existence of this construction. Now I will prove that this is sufficient condition as well, and if we do have this triangle which satisfies this particular equation, then I will be able to build the second, the smaller one. How do I do it? Okay. Easy. Let's assume that I have ADC with this particular property and B1 is smaller than A1, it's smaller than C1. So I will just take this B1 and put my point E on the distance from C equals to the distance of A. So A and E are in the same distance from C. So if this is B1, then this is also B1. So B2 is equal to B1. Then I will build a parallel line. I don't know that this line would be equal to A, so I'll put Y here. Okay, but since it's a parallel line, triangles are obviously similar, and I can put the correspondence Y divided by C1 should be equal to B2, which basically I constructed as being equal to B1, to A1. So I can put actually instead of B2, I can put B1 because it's the same thing. From which follows that Y is equal to B1, C1 divided by A1. But I assumed that my triangle, my initial triangle has this property. So instead of Bc, I can put A2 divided by A, it would be A. So this is equal to this. Okay, now the only thing is are there any triangles which satisfy this particular equality? Well, yes. For example, four, nine and six. Six square is equal to four times nine, so it is six. So triangles do exist and this condition is necessary and sufficient for being able to make such a construction. So the original question, if I have five elements, two sides and all three angles of one triangle, correspondingly, well, not correspondingly exactly, but equal, somehow equal to two sides and three angles of another triangle, does it mean that triangles are congruent? The answer is no. They will be similar, but not congruent. And there is an example. So there is a definite conclusion of this that original theorems, which I presented in the very beginning, side, side, side, side, angle, side, angle, these are good theorems. But to say that any three or even any five elements, as we have just seen, are sufficient to make triangles congruent, no. It's not exactly any. You have to have it in proper order, like side, angle, side. Not side, side, angle or something like this. Because this is an example when two sides and all three angles of one triangle is equal to two corresponding sides of another, but triangles are similar, but not congruent. So this is an example. Six, four and nine. And one more little thing. If this is six, four and nine, what is exactly? Now we have this. Okay, if this is four, this is six, and this is nine. So this is four. This is six. On the smaller one. So what is x? Well, we can derive x from, let's say, from here. So it would be x divided by b, which is what, four equals to a. A is what? Six divided by nine, right? Let's see. So what do we have? 24 times equals x, which is eight-thirds. This is eight-thirds. So two triangles. One of them has four, six and nine. Another has eight-thirds, four and six. Have two sides equal, four equals four, six equals six, and all angles are equal to each other. This is an example. Now the last thing which I wanted to touch is what about this angle? Between the biggest and the smallest sides of triangle ABC. Now we have come out with this necessary and sufficient condition. I would like to also derive a condition on this angle. That's very interesting. It's not just from this condition, follows some condition on angle alpha. How? Well, let's drop the indices ABC, so it will be ABC, and we know that a square is equal to d square plus c square minus 2 dc cosine of alpha, right? This is the law of cosines. Now I can substitute BC here. So for these triangles, which satisfy this, which satisfy this particular condition, we can say this. Now 2 BC will be on the left. This BC will be on the right. So what I will have is 2 BC equals b square plus c square minus minus BC. I will put minus 2 BC and plus BC. Why? For a simpler reason, because this is b minus c square. Positive value, which means that 2 BC since this is positive, this is greater than just simple BC. Because it's equal to BC plus something positive. b and a and c are all different. We have just made this sure in the very beginning. From which follows that not to BC, I'm sorry, it's supposed to be cosine alpha here. Cosine alpha. From which BC we can cancel, which means cosine alpha greater than one half. Or alpha is less than p naught over 3, which is 60 degrees. So angle alpha should be less than 60 degrees. Okay, that's it. I recommended to read the notes for this lecture. There is a little better picture and again, I'm using indices 1 and 2 here in the notes for this lecture and use different colors, red and blue. So that might actually be a little better. I don't know. So read the notes and well, good luck.