Hey guys, what is up, welcome to my channel. As you can tell from the title, I'm gonna be talking about the eight Natasha Denona palettes that are going to be leaving my collection. I will no longer have them, but here's why. First of all, this is actually the first video that I'm saying this. I will have another video where I say the same thing as I'm saying now my skincare declutter. I filmed that yesterday, but I decided that this is gonna go up first. I'm moving officially, like we have an apartment and our application's been approved. So at the end of February, Jose and I are moving to Miami. Super duper excited, but what that means? I'm losing some Natasha Denona palettes. So I started my YouTube channel when I was in college and I moved back home with my parents and my mom also, as you guys know, has a very big makeup obsession like myself and we love the same brands. We love Natasha Denona. So especially in the beginning of my YouTube channel when I was trying to grow, but I didn't have that much money. My mom and I would go half on things. We lived in the same house, so we could get an Natasha Denona palette if we just split the money. It worked a lot easier that way. But since that time, which by the way just hit my four-year anniversary on YouTube four years ago, to now many things have changed in my life. I was gonna move out eventually. So there are some things amid this divorce that my mom is keeping and that I am not. So I figured I'd have kind of a last hurrah with these palettes in a video and talk about them. I will say though, I've been anticipating this separation of makeup collections for over a year now. My husband and I have been anticipating this move. So I've slowly, if a palette has gone on sale for a good discount, have been adding the palettes that I know my mom will keep for herself to my collection. So it's not as devastating as a year ago when I thought it was going to be.  So I have one mini that is going to be exiting my collection. This is the mini nude and this is one that honestly I might have to pick up during the next Sephora VIP sale because this is one of Natasha's better five-panners that are $25. This is one that I highly recommend to you guys. The reason why I haven't picked this up at this point for myself is because you know I don't need these colors. I probably have these colors already in my Natasha Denona collection but for the price point the colors are just really great. This is her fantastic quality. I'm gonna zoom you in and let's just swatch, shall we? I'm gonna turn the lights down so you can really see the colors a little bit better. Look at that. Do you see the reflight? By the way, my fingers are super dry. I swear I've been lotioning them but they get like this every winter. Anyways. Ugh, they feel so buttery smooth. Let's swatch them. Look at that. Oh my goodness. Is this a swatch and sip? I don't know. See that? Well, no you can't. It's blurry! Okay, wait, wait, wait. Hold your horses. Look at this. Ugh, that shade right there and then we have, this one's not exciting, Matt Brown. I mean these are like a little bit on the warmer side, neutrals and you can see the shimmers are really reflective. They really are the traditional really great Natasha Denona formula. You're not getting skipped out on with her providing like a cheaper quality formula. So this is one that I'm really really sad to leave behind and I am anticipating purchasing this in the near future just to have it, you know, for reference on my channel. So that's the first one that I will be saying goodbye to. And by the way, a number of these are older palettes because in the recent year I've been buying this stuff outright by myself. Everything that's launched because I knew I was moving but not at the time that most of these palettes were out. Okay, the next one is a super duper old one. This is when my mom and I first discovered Natasha Denona. This is the eyeshadow palette, palette number 10. Now how pretty is this? I actually do have these shades though in my collection. These are in one of the 28 pan eyeshadow palettes which I do have from Natasha Denona. So she doesn't really sell these too often or at least she doesn't market them but she used to make these five pans which a lot of them were shades that were already existing like in the 28 pan palettes. And this was before I purchased a 28 pan palette because this color curation is everything. So this palette has certainly seen better days probably but you know you just don't see the curations like this. When you are looking at the palette itself where there's 28 shades, I didn't envision a color story like this. But when Natasha, her being the genius that she is, puts them together for you, I love that. So if you look at the 28 pan palette, I suggest you look up some of her five pan palettes because you can truly get some inspiration just by looking at these. And then we have this shade right here, matte purple. So this is one of her most gorgeous five pans that she curated in my opinion but obviously I'm not sad about it because I do have these colors. But this color story you have to admit it's absolutely stunning. But also if you don't want to pay for the 128 pan palette, it might be worth looking into seeing if these are on her website because they are her great 28 pan formula which hot take. Those are her best formulations she's ever created. So how pretty is this? I love this like taupey purpley shade right here. By the way my skin is looking not good. I'm testing out a new foundation. It does not look good there. Anyways, so that is the next palette that I will be saying a la vista too. Okay this next one I know so many of you guys are going to be sad for me. This is one of Natasha's more popular ones. Is this limited edition? I don't think it is. But it is just a classic neutral palette you guys. Unfortunately my mom is not willing to give this one up because she loves it so much. It's one of her favorites. This is the camel palette. I mean neutral lovers, you know, you see. This is so stunning. I'm sad about this one. I don't think I will ever pick this up just because you know I don't need these colors. Okay I probably have them a thousand times over in my collection. But it's just the fact of how it's curated into one palette. There aren't any glitters in it by the way. I know you can see the reflex in that top color. It's just what's left over on my fingers from the makeup I was playing with today. This curation is so great. It's great to travel with. These are everyday wearable colors. That great Natasha Denona formula. It's fabulous. It really really is. This is one that I'm super sad to be saying goodbye to. But you know it's not one that I've been reaching for at all lately. But it's just great to know that you have it and to have this option. But it is time for me to say goodbye. I totally recommend it though. The reason that it's not coming with me is because my mom loves it so much. So it's a great great palette. This eyeshadow palette was in my early days of YouTube that I reviewed it. It is so pretty to look at. This is the cranberry palette. Take a look at this. Natasha does not come out with 5 pans like this really anymore does she? So this is her first attempt at the wet dry formula that she came up with. Now what is this called? At the cream to powder formulation that she came out with. And boy it was a major fail. Whenever you hear me talking about her cream to powder formulation being improved. This is where it started from and it was not a good place. I was not super in love with this palette. Honestly you guys let me show you some swatches. So we have Daisy so we have this shade right here. Which is absolutely stunning right? This totally makes the palette. I think this shade right here didn't really give me too much on the eyelid. And then of course this shade was just fine right? Natasha really doesn't mess around with shimmer. She doesn't do bad. But look at this. Okay it looks okay by swatch. Actually it looks like this. But let me show you. So obviously this shade has made the palette worth keeping right here. This shade is what it's all about. So that second shade you can see it's a little bit sheer. Almost like watercolor on the eyelid. And then we have this shade. And then it's just not giving what it should give. You know what I mean? Take a look at this in the pan. Do you see how dark it is and what you get? That was very disappointing when this palette came out. I got a pretty look with it. I liked a lot of the shades in here. But this was a palette that I just didn't recommend because it wasn't up to par. You know and then we have this shade right here. She kills it with the shimmer. Absolutely. But the matte shades and most looks are what's going to be the base, the foundation. And if you don't have that good foundation, it's not really worth it when you're paying this much money. Anyways, the palette is so pretty by Swatch. Absolutely. And I do love the shimmers in here. But I do not feel my heartbreaking about not bringing this one with me. I haven't had too many instances where I've had to refer back to this either. So I don't even feel as though it's of too much value in my collection. But what a little fun walk down memory lane. Ooh, I wish you would come out with more formulations like this. Wow, it's like a chroma crystal. Absolutely stunning. Okay, last five pan before we get into the big dogs. But this is also a little bit older. This is the coral palette. This one is cute. She's a nice spring palette. But I'd call her forgettable. Okay, because I don't really remember too much about this palette. I haven't been inclined to reach for it. There hasn't been instances where I've needed to refer back to it. So she's certainly forgettable because I pretty much forgot about her. So let's take a look here. Very pretty spring colors. Of course, you know, I'm reaching towards this. From what I can remember, I would say I wasn't enthused with this palette. I mean, I thought it was fine. But nothing to write home about really, just with all the other options that Natasha Denona gives you. Hmm, yeah. Okay, this shade was a little underwhelming. I mean, if you saw how this shade swatched in the cranberry palette, I think this is why I was a little disappointed because it looks really poppy and beautiful on the palette. But it is a bit more sheer, more lid-toppery. Just take a step back. You can see it's okay on the eyelid, but nothing to write home about. And then the warm tones, which are very, very warm. Ooh, that matte looks pretty. And that's quite rich.  I think it's really cute for the spring. I'm not mad about it at all. But it's not a palette that I am going to be missing too much from my collection as well. Did you pick this up? Do you remember this palette? I really don't remember too much about it. As I wash my hands here, let's prepare for the big ones. There's only three, which thank goodness, because I have been preparing for that. Like, I, if I had moved a year ago, I would not have had the Beba palette. I would not have had the gold palette, and I would not have had the Lila palette. All of those were ones that I was like, oh, okay, like I need to, I need to get those in my collection before I move. Well, let's start off with the one that I'm the least sad about. This is the Sunset Palette. Kind of the OG Natasha did on a palette. Her 28 pence came out before this, but this really made her get a lot of attention. I mean, so many brands were trying to dupe this color story right here. It is extremely, extremely warm. You guys know I'm not so into really warm toned palettes these days. I like warm toned look. Don't get me wrong, but palettes that have so much red and orange are a bit too intense for my preferences. So this has been a palette the last couple of years, but I've just really not been interested at all. I haven't been sad about losing it, but this past month for my Beauty Buff tutorial, which if you don't know, I do have a membership on YouTube, where I do one exclusive tutorial for you a month. I did use this palette, and I really, really enjoyed it. I actually did. It was so pretty, and it made me be like, oh my gosh, do I need it? But you guys know I don't need this, and I'm going to be saying goodbye to it. This particular one is quite old. Honestly, it might be expired, but take a closer look here. I mean, it's outdated, I feel like at this point for some reason, but it's time to say goodbye. But one thing you will know about these luxury shadows is despite this being at least four years old, it has kept its true formula over time. With a drugstore or more affordable shadow a lot of times, I feel like they would have dried out at this point, not with these high-end formulas like Natasha Denona. The formula has certainly kept its integrity. And a hot topic in makeup that I don't want to get too much into, but just my personal opinion, powders do last longer.  If you take care of your brushes and you take care of your eyeshadows, you store them in a dry place. Like I said, you wash your brushes before you use them, so that bacteria doesn't get into the product either. I keep my powders for quite a long time.  But longer than the palette itself would suggest, because I take care of it. So this is still good. As long as it keeps the integrity of the formula, you're in the clear if you've taken care of it. And look at this. These also watch so beautifully. This is such a classic Natasha Denona palette before she got into really messing around with her formulas, which is not a bad thing that she did, but these were just amazing formulations. So unfortunately, I will be saying goodbye to this one. It's just too warm for me now. I haven't felt the need to pick this up. I know she's had multiple instances where they have been on sale. And every time I thought about it, and then I just decided, no, you don't need this. So stop it. So I actually do have a brand new palette that Natasha Denona just launched that I am choosing to leave behind. And that is the glam face palette in the darker version. So I do have the lighter version that I will be keeping for myself, but this is my mom's. It's the darker palette. To be quite honest, I actually prefer the eyeshadows in here compared to the light. Well, I wouldn't say prefer, but I like both. And I really did want to purchase this palette to take with me because I love this. But I decided to take a step back because this blush dried out on me, at least in my light palette. Let's see how my mom's looks. But here's what the palette looks like. So there's a cream blush, a highlight powder, and then the most beautiful eyeshadows. I mean, I do really love this palette. I love the layout. I love everything, but I found that in mine, this blush dried out in the light palette. But it actually does not feel like it dried out in my mom's. So very interesting. Anyways, there's not too many colors in this palette, which is one of the main factors you'd buy this palette. Dried out in my light really turned me off to purchasing this second one. Maybe it's just that light formula, or maybe there was something wrong with mine, but this did not dry out. So now I want to buy it, but I'm not going to. I don't need it at the end of the day, but I really do love this palette. But anyways, that's something I noticed, and I just noticed that this one did not dry out. Now the shadows in both of these palettes, absolutely incredible. You can see all the dimensions, the variety give you, the formulas are absolutely beautiful. Look at that. Ugh. Even the light one is super duper gorgeous, but of course you're getting so much more depth with this one. Other than the blush drying out, I really don't have anything bad to say about these. You probably don't need them because they're very neutral and dupable colors that you can get from many brands at many price points. It's a great Natasha Denono formulation. Overall I was very happy with this palette, and I'm very happy to see that this blush didn't dry out. So now I'm like, mmm, do I need it? But you guys know I don't. I don't. I was happily able to utilize this when it was new in multiple videos, and then also use this deeper palette for reference, but I will be saying goodbye to it in the next coming weeks. Okay, it is time for the last palette. And this is the one that I'm having a very hard time with. I was never attracted to this palette at first, but I think over time makeup changes with my preferences as I've gotten a little bit more older, I'm regretting it. The Star Palette. I'm saying goodbye to the Star Palette. So this is actually the eyeshadow palette that I'm wearing today, and how pretty is this look?  Now I understand you have this more neutral section, and then you have this more rosy kind of section over here. They're split. Just visually I did not like that. I just wanted to push them together, so I was never drawn to this palette. Then my mom picked it up for herself. This was something she bought for herself. I didn't go have these with her because I never really wanted this. But now I love cool tones and I love these styles of neutrals. I love this palette. The color stories are stunning. The formulations are stunning. It's expensive, so I haven't bought it yet. To be quite honest, I don't talk about it too much in other videos, so there isn't an immediate need to have it. I don't need anything, but let's swatch, okay? So we're going to start off with the more neutral section that you saw. Oh my gosh. Look at this.  It's so pretty. This is in a weird order. Look at that.  Sorry. You just can't beat this formula, can you? I mean, we even got this duo chrome in here. Lastly, this is the color that's all over my eye. It looks gorgeous on the eye. Look at that. I mean, this is a color story right here. You can see the quality just within the swatches. Okay, let's get into the cooler side here. I'm going to put the swatches a little bit closer to one another because my short arm is running out of space. Oh, what a beautiful skin tone shimmer that is. I will admit that given that this is my mom's palette, I haven't used it too terribly much. It just hasn't been something that I've reached for, but wow. Look at that. Okay, last color. And I feel like I haven't taken advantage of the time together because look at this color story. I think it is so pretty. It's muted, but it still is really interesting. It's not your traditional everyday style palette. I used to feel uninspired by this palette. I don't know what has happened to me in recent years, but now I'm looking at this and I just love the options that this has. So this is one that I am very sad to say goodbye to. But, you know, I really don't need it right now. I just don't. But it is a gorgeous palette and it was fun to swatch. So, yeah. All right, you guys, there we have it. Those are all of the Natasha Denona palettes that will no longer be in my collection. Fun walk down memory lane here. And you know what that means? Since I am losing these palettes, that means before I go, I will get my rankings up for you guys. They were on my list to film.  They are coming. Unfortunately, a Pat McGrath video like this is going to be coming as well. But I hope you guys enjoyed this video and it was fun for you. If you aren't subscribed to my channel already, I would love it if you would consider taking the time to do so. And I will see you guys in the next one. Bye, guys. Have a good one.


Good morning cyber traders welcome on January 3rd on this beautiful Thursday. Has everybody doing this great? wonderful exciting trading day with Apple taking a little bit of a Bombshell report has everybody doing good to see you Jean Phil Ken. Good morning everybody Steve I'm telling I'm really excited. I'm so happy that we're starting to get into full groove What a rally yesterday, huh in the market? I'm telling you guys. I was you know I got a couple things I want to talk about before we start getting into a watch list and how fun we of the market of a rally we had yesterday First of all, we had a really nice little um some really good news that came out in the market Listen, I've been doing this for 25 years. Okay, and I've never seen Anything that would bring down a market with realistically no major news I mean you got some news here and news there this and that the gum was shut down and and and you know the trade wars but like It's not a financial catastrophe. You know, I mean when I was in 2008 we had a banking crisis I mean we saw the writing on the wall. It was just a matter of time. Yeah, I know Ken The sky is falling this and that but I listen. I was the internet bubble. Yeah, I mean listen I remember Amazon back then me granted worked out pretty well now after 20 years But that stock was trading at 3,000 times earnings. That's like buying a bottle of water and paying $1,000 for it 3,000 times earnings Cisco trading at 200 times earnings the average company should be trained no more than 20 30 times earnings You know, I'm not here to give you economics class and you know explaining how that works But you know, we're just traders, but when it comes down to it You know, I'll tell you a funny story When it comes to trade will lead to just made a plus eight on on that K the KTO V Alright, well listen, let's give her round of applause Way to go and that's where I want to go with this regarding about a stock like KT KTO V But and the reason I wanted to talk about some of these stocks is that you know I get a lot of scrutiny, you know, a lot of people will come up to me and says, oh I heard of Fausta heard of Cybertrain versity. They trade penny stocks. I don't trade penny stocks, you know You never heard of these stocks and first of all, let's be clear. Okay number one. I and We do not trade penny stocks. Okay, and if anybody asks you You should always ask them. What is a penny stock? I'm just curious and you know what? We know what they think a penny stock is anything that trades under a $5 First of all, a penny stock is a stock that trades on the bulletin board on the pink sheets over the counter We only trade Nasdaq national stocks. Okay, which means you get level three quotes Has a short list everything else, you know, there's different rules in in regulations regarding about stocks stocks of What what types of exchanges they trade on that's number one. Okay. All right next thing people says, okay Well, regardless of what that means And is a lot of reasons companies don't have to report, you know all these, you know crazy rules That's why they trade on one verse the other But the main reason people always ask to me and they says well, you know, I never heard of these stocks and you know By the way, what's apple options doing? Okay, and I'm like, why are you trading apple options? Oh, I can't afford to trade the stock. Well, why can't you trade a stock like leader just trade the ktov? You know can just made, you know, nine cents on 2 000 shares made himself, you know 180 bucks. All right, give him a round of applause What's wrong with that? Well, I never heard of the stock. Well, you know what has apple working out for you? Okay, how's that working out for you now?  Hey, what's apple doing today? Hey, well Hey, well, what's going on with tesla today? Hey, what's going on with uh with facebook? Those stocks are what's going on with amazon guys these stocks are down almost 50 50 Freakin percent Okay, could you believe that I don't even know if legally if i'm allowed to say that I guess it's my show I could say that but 50% go ahead knock yourself out knock yourself out because you know what the way apple looks like right now It's probably going to 100 It's probably going to go to 100. Okay. Where was it 220? And you know, it's so funny, you know When you look at the news the bombshell report that apple just reported look where they put all their chips in You know, everybody know why they're getting crushed? Okay, they put all Their chips in okay, and by the way, this is probably why a lot of these big corporations didn't and a lot of these uh Companies didn't like what's going on In the print uh regarding what the trade war. It's going on they put all their chips in all in overseas and all in china Yeah, how's that working out for you? No wonder why maybe maybe now it's starting to make sense Why a lot of them were not on board with the tariffs of sanat because they all went in You know all chips in overseas and now it's getting out. It's it's biting them So look at the stock values now. They don't they don't plant well steve. Listen. That's why we're here, but that's okay That's okay. You don't want steve Catastrophes make opportunities for us. All right, so let's go out there and uh, let's make the best of it Hey, you know what let me tell you how you know if you're a good trader and a bad trader A good trader could survive in in markets like this I've been doing this for 25 years And I've been through the worst and I've met some companies. I even met schools That was so great and blue cyber trading university away out of the doors. You know where they are today bankrupt Bankrupt and I don't want to repeat but there are so many other companies out there Um, even traders. I know they was sitting on top of the world driving ferraris this and that You know where the last guy that I had working on my roof Was was one of my top traders in my trading firm And you know why he was a top trader because he was that guy to all went in all the time He went all in all in all in all in all in but then when the market crashed, you know what he was all out So anyway, it's all about slow and steady guys make your days pay Don't get cocky, but I just think it is so comical After seeing what happened with facebook and I called I told you guys When facebook got crushed that time and it says, you know what we could see facebook Going back to 100, you know, where did it go? It went from it went from like, let me bring up facebook over here So facebook, um, when we saw it up around 220 and then we had that bombshell report It went to 180 and says, oh, you know what watch the stock can go to 150 and sure enough It did now look where it went went down to 120. All right, so they got they got their issues coming ahead, you know, um Coming after them, but you know what? if the the only thing I personally How these companies will stay in business, you know if facebook and and And instagram and all these companies if they're able to keep their fees low Because obviously they have to make money, right and and compete against companies like google which, you know The same lead, you know follow, you know follow into that leads But you know like some of those some of those leads probably cost like 10 15 dollars if they could keep it a couple of Cents, I mean they'll keep themselves in business. All right, so regardless about all the scrutiny That's when you know when you that's when you know, you got a good deal on the stock When you got the worst of the worst in the news and the worst of everything And and the stock doesn't go any lower. That's when you know, you hit hit the bottom Just fix the past with the worth watching. Yeah, I know listen that stock is obviously doing pretty well Um, I know you guys doing pretty well on the k tov trade And you could see the thing popping by the way, I was going to put a quick announcement What was the first stock on the list at 8 o'clock this morning? I'm going to put it in the chat right there Would I tell you right there k tov? And if you were here at 8 o'clock this morning, you also got in around a buck. Listen I don't know 20 on my money in about what 30 minutes. Where are you going to make that? Right here. So anyway, let's talk about some of the watch stocks that we traded yesterday Uh, some of them did really well. First of all, let's look at hc Uh, hclp before we go through today's watch list that one was phenomenal. Look at that beautiful sock went from Right out of the gate just didn't stop The only thing I didn't like about it.  Look at that gorgeous fowl still flag right there. Is that beautiful? That's what it's all about guys. By the way, we're gonna you learned it in phase two next week We're gonna be doing phase three. So that one did pretty well another one the ar nc Don't know what it is never heard of it.  Stock goes from 1660 all the way to 19 dollars, you know, how you doing? I'll take that all day long all right And um and the ac and the ar nc There was no news.   That one did really well Everyone should at least be about 20 30 cents on that trade. So anyway, that's what we missed yesterday Now let's talk about what's going on this morning because there are a couple of stocks obviously Listen, there's a lot of stocks moving this morning and for some of you here that are new And we're watching this on one of our our our social network Stations, you know, you got to be in it to win it in the market hours. Obviously new things pop up So but what we found this morning, obviously everyone's doing well on the k tov That one is doing great. That one made the watch list. Thank you very much And if you missed it, don't worry about it because uh, we'll see how she opens up in about 15 minutes from now Next one iz ea stocks up 22 100 000 shares stock was an eight dollar eight dollar stock last year You can see the stock got destroyed. We know the stock moves. She backed off in pre-market So I don't know a little skeptical on that might pass on that one, but I want to see how she opens up Al qa that one had some great volatility stock went up just went down from two Ever it's pretty much all over the place, but this stock you could see was a yeah, it was a 55 dollar stock back in uh, 2016 Some of you remember it. We did trade it back here The ending of last year that stock had some good movement So by knowing that stock go back to your journals what we train you what to do see how you traded See what what you learned from it. I know we all traded that stock Listen, I always tell you this the most important thing that you have to understand when it comes to trading Is that when we teach you? You know like my job our job here at ctu is not to teach you how to make money Our job is to teach you how to control losses Okay, and when you're a student of cybertrain university, you see how highly we focus on You know on the journals and in and then whenever some of you need help We says you know what?  Let's look at let's review what you did You have to learn from your mistakes because once you do that you're not going to do it again You got to learn and when you win you want to take a good note You know and you know some of you probably got this trade and didn't get it like I missed this al qa You know look at your journals, you know, maybe maybe it might not be Before you maybe you're ready for it now But you got to take your notes and take it very very seriously You remember we got money on the lawn guys. This is not vegas You're not here to kind of make this all in one night. You're here to do this for the rest of your life Here's another stock that's um, I thought was pretty interesting too the db VT the stock took a big hit I'm seeing a little starting to fill up the gap right now. So this one stock was looking pretty good um on the bounce Making a little comeback Sbs this was actually my favorite stock so far this morning this one.  There's a big iceberg order out there on this sbs and sure enough look at her She's trying to creep up there pretty nicely, you know bring up the woman to charge She's going up pretty nicely spread's not terrible. I saw some really good iceberg orders out there You don't see it right now on the matrix, but it was pretty good. Um, you know, I saw him earlier So if you're in that position you should have gone in I don't know. I think it was like 10 15 10 20 You know so but it's looking pretty strong going into this open. I really that look that that's very very important Uh, be I spelled this wrong not b and y b My okay, so here's another stock that took a little bit of a hit right here Bristol Myers. Yeah, go right ahead knock yourself out. Go trade some brand name stocks. Yeah, how's that working out for you? Anyway, a little bit of a brand name might be level five Uh, not I give it minimum of three definitely four Uh, but if you're not a level three trader They were from bmp this thing. Uh, bmy stock is uh, going to be pretty volatile But uh, but she is making a little bit of dead cat bounce. We know that as long as they're not a pharmaceutical stock They do come back. All right, so there's your brand name stock and and obviously as an indicator We're going to keep an eye on apple because apple, you know every single person Um in every etf has apple in it and it's going to take down a lot of them, but Everyone heard about the ad uh adp job reports 271,000 source pass expectations So meanwhile the market should be up huge today But it's not going to be up that huge because apple's going to take them down You know one last tip of the day. I want to give everyone before we go. Okay The dow Jones When I first came into this business Um, one of my uh, one of my mentors Always taught me and says and I said, oh, what's the dow doing? What's the dow doing? What's the dow?  Makes up 30 stocks of the 25,000 stocks in the market He says and you know that some of those stocks have more power As in more percentage control the dow than others and if you don't if you're not a good performer They will kick you out out of the dow And put somebody else in there So the dow just to let you know is a little bit of an artificial number You know the russell 2000 very good numbers s and p pretty decent, you know But uh, just be careful when you look at the dow numbers as much because you know, there if a company Is is one of their You know, you always look down as blue chip stocks, you know But be careful of the dow sometimes of taking it, you know taking too much credit for it because You know it only makes up 30 of them g was the dow at that time. Yeah, and where's g e right now You know if g was there, you know where the dow probably would be Destroyed it. So anyway, that's where that goes in but I'll tell you one thing If you ever hear a company that makes any of those, uh makes some of those S&Ps or the dow forget it those stocks take off. So always keep that in mind. All right guys, listen Sorry if it bothered boring you and talking about these things I just always a kick of talking about apple because I always hear a few people always give me scrutiny like oh Yeah, that that guy trades, you know, they trade penny stocks and this and that and I'm like Obviously people have no idea What how trading works and and what does it mean to trade a nasdaq national penny stocks bulletin board What they do whatever but obviously being a student, you know one versus the other and why we do But at the end of the day, let's just make money guys. Listen. Good luck. Happy trading We'll see you back here. Um, we have a an event today at 12 o'clock Open house for recruit recruitment See if we can see if anybody's interested in joining the team and if they obviously if they're any good We'll prove them to be part of the team, but uh, but once again, uh, let's uh, let's The new year looks like a file looks like the market's starting to pick up some momentum So let's go out there and make some money. All right guys, uh, bob says thousand Can you please send me your platform? Please bob send me an email You got my email right there. Um f a us to oh you should be getting emails from me Anyway, and I'll be able to get it over over to you. All right Or you can't send anybody the staff at cto and I'll send it to you. Good luck everyone. Happy trading


Santa knows where all the best toys are, and this December many of the Hunter smartphones are just a penny with service in Appalachian Wireless. Stop by your local Appalachian Wireless to check out all of the great smartphone deals that consistently top the nice lists. This Christmas is truly going to be bigger and better than ever. Better service, bigger savings, that is. That's today's Appalachian Wireless! Floyd County Fiscal Court members were meeting today in Prestonsburg for a special called meeting of the Fiscal Court with the chief topic of discussion being a proposed 3% transient tax on all hotels in the county. A tax which has met with a considerable amount of opposition. The reason that they were picking Floyd County to the Marriott brand, which they will probably have been a fair few weeks in, was because of our low taxes. And he told me, if you really move so, that he wasn't trying to address me but, it will give us a disadvantage from other counties with lower tax rates. We will lose revenue and it will happen. We are 100% opposed and we hope you reconsider. The proposed tax failed without a motion and as a result the county is going to have to look at new ways to tighten their budget. When you have the lack of revenues that we've got that was based upon just as two years ago. Even the previous administration was having close to two and a half million dollars in what we're receiving now. It makes it very difficult to take care of the fixed costs that we've already got. We've got fixed costs within this county that has to be taken care of. I mean, I'm talking, if you want to get into the budgetary, the jail, we've got 175, 185 people that you have to take care of and make sure that you're paying these other jails. The utilities costs, the bond that we have to pay on the old jail. So, what was suggested to me before now, it's up to the court at one time. I mean, they anticipated that they wanted to look at trying to do something to fill the gaps with the transient room tax, which would be on the people that are traveling through Floyd County. It's something that they was looking at. We didn't know what it would raise, if it would raise $100,000, if it raised $150,000, but it would be something that would fill the gap within our recreational and tourism part of our county needs that we have. Those costs are still there. The proposed tax and the second reading of the ordinance could come before the court again at a future meeting. As a matter of state law, the county must have a balanced budget by June 30th. Reporting from Prestonsburg, for EKB News, I'm Jackson Ladder.


Hey everybody, Matt here for Layton Sports Cards Ripping. Two boxes. These are 2022 Leaf autograph football jerseys for Null B. Good luck, Null. Here we go. This is Antonio Gates. Autograph. Chargers jersey that is Beckett certified. Morning, Andrew. There you go. Nice start. Box two. Let's see something crazy. Yeah, I like that Gates. That's awesome. Oh nice. Look at this one. Dan Marino. Autograph. Dolphins jersey JSA certified. There you go. Nice one, Null. Awesome Marino. There you go. Very nice couple boxes for you there. Appreciate the purchase and we'll get these right out to you.


Hey Aaron Aaron judge just spoke about the difficulty that is coming in in a pitch hitting situation like that late in the game after after being on the bench just how impressed were you with your shell is that bat there in the seventh yeah I mean off the bench or not it was it was one of those just really good at bats and obviously in a huge spot in the game down a couple runs with with runners out there to foul off the number of pitches I don't know how many pitches ended up being in the at bat and then really just absolutely get into one it it was just a big time at bat by by a really good player and glad he was able glad I had that sitting over there tonight as a weapon obviously what how nice is that to have that weapon on the bench yeah you know it's really good to see first and foremost that you know geo you know this morning was was doing quite well and you know felt good in pregame and took his normal batting practice so you know I was confident that he could be a player for us tonight and you know he was ready to go you know he did all his pre-work to get ready for that at bat and went up there and put a really special at bat on it Aaron judge with two home runs as well he said last homestand he was not satisfied with his at bats and the production what's been the difference for you in watching him over the last couple of days you know I think I think in that that stretch of a few games where you know when he was getting a pitch he was kind of falling off and then probably expanding a little bit with two strikes I think he's done a really good job of staying in the strike zone and obviously you know he threw out a few hits you know that that weren't homers in Tampa on some tough pitches in the strike zone that he was able to get hits on you know he's been he's been taking his walk here and there and tonight you know when he got pitches to handle he didn't miss them and even that last one I thought he pretty had a pretty good pass on just got in on him just enough but really good at bats all night by him and it's good to see him continue to build we go next to Kandavra yeah first of all can tell us about stands stands squad day-to-day nothing more hopefully nothing more than that but you know could be a couple days and but you know we'll just kind of see how he's doing tomorrow the next day and go from there and second how much has geo become like a glue guy for you on both sides of the ball he's a really good player I mean that's all we've ever seen from him you know when when we saw him for the first time and we're around him in spring training at 19 you know I remember just right away how impressive he was in that spring offensively and defensively and and he hasn't stopped and I think that's a good way of putting it he has been an absolute glue guy for us he he's hit everywhere in the order for us it's got a ton of big hits and and obviously he's special defensively as well


Now, to continue on to our next speaker, Joni Clipper is CEO and founder of Stackhawk, a software as a service company built to help developers find and fix app sec bugs in their code before they hit production. Joni has extensive experience building software for developers. She previously served as VP of Product at VictorOps. It's great to be here at GitLab Commit 2020. Welcome to DevOps Works. So why hasn't security kept up? I'm Joni Clipper, CEO and co-founder of Stackhawk. I've been building software for software developers since I graduated from my MBA program in 2010. The first technical company I worked for built software that allowed users to deploy and manage more than 100 different open source applications on any cloud provider, but just a couple clicks back when we had many cloud providers. We managed updates to those applications programmatically and can even move apps across cloud providers in the case of downtime. So that's really where I cut my teeth in technology. After that, I was the VP of Product at a company called VictorOps from seed stage through acquisition to Splunk in 2018. At VictorOps, we're an incident management platform that helped disrupt that traditional knock and operations model by making it easy to deliver alerts to the engineers who were closest to the code, which really helped reduce mean time to know and mean time to resolve. In 2019, I founded Stackhawk to bring application security into the DevOps workflow by helping software engineers find and fix security bugs in their code before deploying to production. My co-founders and I saw an incredible opportunity to reimagine application security through a software engineering lens. So in this talk, I'm gonna share what key DevOps tenants have been missing in the realm of application security that have kept us shifting APSEC left into the developer workflow and what we need to do to modernize the product practice so we can rapidly deliver more secure software. So DevOps is pervasive and it works. And what I mean by DevOps works is it has unlocked the ability for companies to deliver value to their customers faster. We've seen major shifts in tooling and processes that enable you, our software engineers, to go fast and to deliver that value to our customers. So Agile unlocked the ability for us to quickly plan, develop, and deliver software to customers. Virtualization, cloud, and infrastructure as code removed that sysadmin bottleneck as we empowered engineers to deploy and manage their own resources. Then we've seen massive efficiencies with automation throughout the integration and deployment pipeline. Then we further unlocked speed with orienting to really small releases by breaking up the monolith and investing in microservices architecture and containerization. Then we improved our uptime by creating the ability for engineers who wrote the code to also manage it in production. The next most important area of investment is empowering our engineering teams when it comes to application security. When we do this, we unlock not only the ability to deliver software quickly but more secure software quickly and our customers are expecting this of us. So whether you're part of a younger company that was born with the technical and cultural tenants of DevOps or maybe you're a part of a legacy enterprise that's undergoing digital transformation, we invest in these DevOps principles to quickly respond to customer needs, deliver high quality software, and ultimately remain competitive as a business. So why hasn't AppSec followed the rest of the product and engineering organization in shifting left? So as I was doing research for my company Stackhawk, I wanted to understand why security hadn't yet made it into the developer workflow. I interviewed more than 50 CISOs, security professionals, CTOs, VPEs, you name it, in a matter of a couple of weeks. And we found that there were a lot of technical barriers to current solutions, which we're going to talk about, but also some pretty meaningful cultural barriers that needed to be addressed for this change to happen. So the most glaring thing that stood out to me was the relationship between security and engineering was deeply strained. It's not too dissimilar from the early days of the more traditional IT ops versus devs type of strain, but at least those teams were really aligned in delivering and maintaining software rate for our customers. So this might be a little worse, honestly, in terms of the type of tension that exists between these groups. But it's somewhat easy to understand when we think that these groups have very different KPIs and operational objectives. Whereas DevOps is about orienting the team to focus on business objectives, security teams are aligned to reducing risk, oftentimes in a way that can come off as at the expense of the business objective. And this has fostered some pretty meaningful cultural issues. The first one really being lack of trust and empathy. So when talking to security folks about engineering being more involved in the app sec, I would commonly hear, you can't get engineers to care about security, to which I totally call BS because security is quality and engineers care a lot about the quality of the software that they deliver. But then when you talk to engineering about the security team, we've all heard these anecdotes, but it's referred to as the department of no or being historically just so difficult to work with that you try to avoid working with them at all costs. The next piece is transparency and observability. We know that both of these are very core tenants of DevOps and something that's missing in the security discipline today. Developers aren't in security software, the vast majority of the time, right? There's little trust that developers should be able to see or action on issues until security tells them to or proves it, right? Which is super inefficient because software engineers are responsible for ultimately solving the problems anyway. And lastly, empowerment. My co-founder, Scott Gerlach, was formerly the CISO of SendGrid and he talks a lot about how we want developers to care about security, but we don't trust them to take a first pass at assessment and resolution of issues. So he comments about the tendency for security teams to buy these expensive, huge AppSec platforms, but then they lock them down so tight with approval gates everywhere. It's impossible for a software engineer to engage or use the products so they abandon. And then we also have several technical challenges when it comes to modernizing AppSec. So first, most tools on the market are built to run in production by a security team. There are many challenges with this, which I call the production bias and we're gonna double click on that here in just a minute. Next, these tools are really hard to configure and deploy. Many, particularly in the land of DAST, which is Dynamic Application Security Testing and the land we operate in the most at Stackhawk is scanning the running application. And that's really difficult to get working in a repeatable manner, making automation super hard. These tools just weren't built for it. Most AppSec tools were built with the idea that a human is going to be manually running tests against an application and the good news is this is really starting to change. Next, a lot of these tools generate a ton of noise. Output is super verbose and it's also written in this very security specific language rather than something that's easy for an engineer to quickly grok and action on. And we all know that a key component of DevOps tooling is to mitigate noise and ensure that a developer's attention is only drawn to what's truly important. And lastly, these tools just don't fit in with existing developer tooling and processes. So on the previous slide, we talked about security folks saying that devs don't care about security. But when we look at this list of challenges, I mean, my question is how can they afford to? In a world where software engineers are largely measured on delivering business value, the cost of caring about AppSec today is often just way too high. So the production bias. We discussed that many AppSec tools on the market are built to run against code that's already been deployed to production and they're designed to be operated by a security professional. This orientation toward production and lack of involvement by the development team at the right time and in the right context makes it impossible to modernize AppSec. So the first piece of the production bias is the people. So today, AppSec tools are commonly run in production by two groups. One is the security team because production is where they know the application the best. The other is by a pen tester. And that's because production is their point of access. Often with black box testing, we expect them to test from outside in. So in this context, it makes perfect sense that these tools to date have been designed for these two groups. However, it's highly inefficient. Both of these groups struggle to instrument their tests because they're less familiar with how the application was built to work. So setting up an engagement is a pretty heavy lift in order to actually get a really good assessment. From there, the primary value by these groups, then tends to center on the finding of the things. So there's a lot more emphasis on finding the number of things versus finding and fixing the right things. And this has repercussions, right? It's super inefficient because the finders of security bugs are not the fixers of security bugs. And it reinforces that adversarial relationship we open to talking about, right? Your product and engineering teams are working hard to deliver features and business value. And some number of months later, an outside party breaks your things and says, look, I broke your stuff. You need to go fix all of these bugs. We've long moved on to other tasks. So that involves a lot of context switching. So I wanna be super clear when we talk about people. I am not advocating that people should not get pen tests. I am suggesting that that method of knowing about security bugs should not be your only introduction or access to this type of information. The next most critical part of the production bias is timing. So as companies are rapidly shipping code to production, security is not baked into this workflow. Either you're not rapidly shipping in which case, APSEC processes act as a blocker for getting code to production or the security team is constantly playing catch up. And it's oftentimes, nine times out of 10, the latter situation. But it gets worse. Because when APSEC tools favor running in production, like the elephant is in the room, is that the bugs are already in production. I try not to laugh hysterically when I read the slide because it's like, it seems crazy to me, right? We wanna find these things before we deploy. Now, there are going to be times when you intentionally ship security bugs to production, just like you would a defect, right? But the intentionality is the important thing here. This should be done eyes wide open and be a risk-based decision. So you might know that exposure is super limited or you might know that you're planning on fixing that security bug in the next sprint. But at the end of the day, production should not be the first place that you're checking if you have security bugs. And the third piece of the production bias is context. So when we check for security bugs in production, some period after a release, excuse me, it's super inefficient. Engineers have moved on to other sprint tasks and they're no longer in context of their code. So fixing involves context switching, which we know is very both inefficient and expensive. When scanning for apps like bugs in production, typically tools that are on the market today are scanning an FQDM, a fully qualified domain name. So something like dot dot dot dot or app dot. And the result is a list of bugs that exist somewhere in the app, right? Under that parent domain name. And that makes it really difficult to identify the specific part of the app or the service that's affected. And it also lacks the context of the specific data handled by that service. So you end up with a security team creating these tickets and doing a lot of ticket shuffling, trying to figure out which service was affected and then the team that owns that service and who is going to be available to fix it. And then we talked about an inherent focus on the number of bugs being found. And this is really problematic. You hear a lot of stories about, you know, employing these security tools that find just like tons and tons of security bugs being real or not, right? And then the goal of the development team or the relationship between security and development is just a goal of percentage to fix bugs over time being a primary driver of value, which is arbitrary. And it ignores the business context of the findings and the trade-off decisions around risk and business value generation. So instead we should be engaging in discussions like how important is this thing, this app to the business? Should we be fixing all of the bugs on an internal application or should we just be going fast on that? And how should we think about our apps and the data that they handle? So the production bias results in the wrong team and by that I mean the team who isn't ultimately going to fix the bug, finding vulnerabilities at the wrong time because they're in production without appropriate context. So here's how test-driven security should work. And for this slide, I'm just gonna read it, right? When a team writes code, they know the syntax is wrong when it won't compile. When a team merges code, they know there's a problem when it doesn't merge. When they run unit tests, they know the code is wrong when it fails the unit test. When they run integration tests, they know the code is wrong when the product doesn't work as it was designed. So when a team introduces a security vulnerability, they should know because it fails a security test. So at this point I want to emphasize that instrumenting test-driven security is something that engineering teams should instrument. Even if they don't have a security team or function at their company, this is something that engineering can and should lead within their organizations. So what does the right team look like when it comes to APSAC? We think it's really about developers and informed stakeholders. Ultimately, our developers fix security issues. So let's make them aware of those issues as they're writing the code. And in this world, we reimagine the role of the security person or team as a coach whose responsibility is to enable their team, the dev team or league of teams to be successful. And there is value in optimizing for the developer experience that really plays into what security professionals are looking for anyway. It's super efficient. Engineers fix bugs in flight. It democratizes security information across the organization. And when we do that, security becomes a standard discussion in the building of software. It affords collaboration among teams at the right level and provides an opportunity for targeted education. And when all of this happens, it allows our security teams to truly scale. So this last tip is again, absolutely leverage pen testers for security reviews and tough business logic findings, but let's make sure we have access to this information with every single release. So the right time to be checking for our apps at bugs, if it isn't obvious already, is pre-production. Instrumenting security tests into CI CD gives our engineers feedback immediately. Many of our customers at Stackhawk are checking for app stack bugs on every single merge. They also do this with an awesome GitLab integration. And this is ideal because if a security test fails, you know you introduced a security bug in your latest change. So when we then add the ability to also test locally, engineers have the capability to quickly iterate on the fixed test loop if they find a new bug. So for app stack to modernize, engineers need to be able to test while writing code, test while building code, and security tools should play really well in these phases of development. Next is context. The right context for finding security bugs is in your code as you're writing it. And when this happens, engineers can fix egregious security bugs in flight, and this results in less bugs making it into production and less rework later. The next piece is about the context of your app. And this is important when it comes through with real-time security testing in the context of the application that you're actually working on. Teams then can leverage their microservices architecture to instrument security checks on smaller bits of code, which makes it easier to isolate and fix those issues. Teams should also be able to make better judgment on these smaller bits of code and in context of the app because they know the job of the app that they're working on and the kind of data that it handles. And then lastly, the context of the business. We need to empower engineers to fix the most important things, not all of the things while they're in context of their code. The security team should collaborate with engineering on assessing business risk and work across product and engineering teams to triage lesser severity issues based on resources at hand, business objectives and risk. So when the right people are doing the right jobs, there is a nice bridge built between the security and development organizations. The goal of security team becomes enabling the business to go faster, safer. They lay the right foundations. They focus on scaling security within the organization by empowering their developers and they serve to help educate around risk. When this happens, the development organization can build more secure software also faster, right? When we automate the job of finding app sec bugs and then empower engineers to fix issues in flight, security becomes a natural part of the development process. Okay, so perhaps you're thinking that sounds awesome, but I'm not quite sure where to start. So I've included two great types of app sec tools that every company should be using. SCA or source code analysis helps teams identify vulnerabilities in open source libraries or containers. These tools compare versions of libraries to third party components that you're using to known vulnerabilities and they alert you when it's time to update and some even create a merge request for you. DAST or Dynamic Application Security Testing scans your running app and APIs for vulnerabilities. It's an active scanner in that it's actively attacking your app with inputs and seeking outputs that indicate a present vulnerability. The nice thing about DAST is since it reports successful attacks, there tend to be less false positives. GitLab provides both solutions and really great integrations with several of the tools that I've included on this list of which they're both open source and commercial here. So you should totally check them out. To get started, if you're a developer, it's great because you get to skip step one because you know your app and how it was built and you know your pipeline. So in that case, simply choose an app or a service that you want to start evaluating for security bucks, right? Pick a technology, one of these two are great and just start scanning and pipeline and then as you get comfortable with security driven testing, you get to layer in additional applications and technologies as you go. So that's it for me. Feel free to email me with any questions or anything you want to talk about at joeyatstackhawk.com or feel free to visit stackhawk.com to learn more about how we're putting AppSec in the hands of developers and enjoy the rest of your conference. Thank you so much.


U.K. is negotiating with Armenia about moving illegal migrants there. The British authorities have entered into negotiations with a number of countries around the world about sending illegal migrants deported from the kingdom to their territory. This was reported by the Times. According to the British resource, a dialogue on the fate of illegal immigrants is currently being conducted with Armenia, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire and Botswana. The U.K. believes that it will be possible to conclude appropriate agreements with these states. Previously, an agreement on the movement of illegal migrants was concluded with Rwanda. Previously, options were offered to send illegal immigrants to Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Paraguay and Ecuador. But the Foreign Office of the United Kingdom doubts that Latin American countries will agree to conclude such an agreement. Finally, it is proposed to send illegal immigrants to underdeveloped countries of the African continent like Togo or Sierra Leone. But a number of African countries have already refused such a proposal. These include Tunisia, Morocco, Gambia and Namibia. It is most interested in Armenia's position on this issue. Currently Armenia is practically a mono-ethnic republic, with the exception of small communities of Yazidis and Molokans, as well as Russian relocants. But in his desire to please the West, the country's current Prime Minister, Pashinyan, is ready to turn the Armenian state into something unknown, accepting culturally alien illegal immigrants from the U.K. Armenia has denied holding any substantive or technical talks with the United Kingdom on the possibility of accepting illegal migrants expelled from that country after a British newspaper reported on this. The Republic of Armenia and the United Kingdom have a broad agenda of political dialogue, but there were no substantive or technical negotiations on the specific issue raised in the publication, Armenia's Foreign Ministry said. French Navy prepares for war. The main focus is on Russia. France has shifted its naval posture from intercepting drug traffickers and poachers to training for a conventional war, Rear Admiral Jacques Mallard has told Politico. Mallard commands France's only carrier battle group, built around the nuclear-powered Charles de Gaulle. He spoke about the changes in an interview with the EU edition of Politico, where they're moving from a world where we were pretty free to do as we pleased to one where we feel threatened on a more regular basis. Mallard said, we now train for other missions in particular, what we call high-intensity warfare. Naval combat is becoming increasingly likely, he said, and the French sailors now practice fighting against someone who wants to destroy us. Not someone who wants to do illegal trafficking, not someone who wants to steal fish. With the Russian Navy engaged in the Black Sea and the Houthis of Yemen, interdicting vessels linked to Israel, the US and the UK in the Red Sea, Western navies need to deal with increasingly uninhibited competitors. Mallard said, that's where we become a little more aggressive, or at least we prepare to be. Added the Admiral. According to Mallard, the French and Italian navies will engage in a joint exercise later this spring based on the Polaris programme that simulates a naval battle. Introduced in 2021, the combat simulation works to disinhibit tactical thinking, which Mallard described as a bit more risky but very useful. While the Admiral did not name the expected army, he made it clear it was not the people's Liberation Army Navy. As long as the Chinese haven't invaded the island of La Reunion or decided to kick us off the island of Mayotte, he said, naming two French territories in the Indian Ocean, there's no reason to single out the Chinese as our main adversary. Mallard's comments come after weeks of French President Emmanuel Macron floating the idea of potentially having NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine. The possibility was outright rejected by most, though not all, members of the US-led block. Residents of Russian Orenburg city are furious and threaten Kremlin with rallies. The outskirts of the Russian city of Orenburg are rapidly going under the water. Residents are furious and threaten rallies already in the capital of the region, writes the Mozem Obyaznit Telegram Channel. According to the governor of the region, Denis Pasler, the water level in the Ural River is approaching a record high of 11 meters. The head of the region urged residents of flooded areas to evacuate. Hundreds of houses in the vicinity of Orenburg and several city districts with a population of half a million have already gone under water. The Mozem Obyaznit Telegram Channel contacted the victims. Everything is only getting worse. The house is sinking, says Yulia Selina, who lives in the village of Veseni, a 30-minute drive from Orenburg. Many are flooded and the leadership is inactive. Everyone is silent. The younger son was pulled out through the window. We were able to get out through the door. Yulia continues, My son was very scared. We just made repairs, bought furniture and all that stuff. The situation is aggravated by the clove in the village where meltwater flows and which the authorities did not clean up before the flood, ignoring the requests of residents. Promised payments for recovery will not be enough. No one takes into account the damage to the house. Not to mention furniture, repairs, equipment, things. We didn't take anything out. I'm not the only one. People will not be satisfied. So there will be a rally. She promises. Valeria, whose house was flooded in the village of Zarechny, works in the regional administration. On April 10th, the water approached her house and the yard completely flooded in a few minutes. As a resident of the region, of course, I believe that the payments are too small and do not cover losses. But as a civil servant, I assume that these are only primary payments. She says, Here is what the residents of Orenburg write in local publics and on the page of Governor Passler. The special water operation is going according to plan. Why are the payments to victims so ridiculous? People have lost everything because of the negligence of officials. People don't have houses. But you give 20,000? Do they have to live on it? Feed the children? Thank you to the Orenburg City Hall for spending the budget on lanterns instead of engineering protection of the city.


What's up everybody, I'm the man goose you are awesome and it's time for goosebites little mini MOBA updates in case you don't want to watch For the minions and see all the conversation there, but I do need to apologize right off the top I don't have the big updates that I thought I was gonna have for a theory all as a consolation prize They are letting me show off doctor grace, which is a support scheduled after the alpha She's not gonna be in the alpha and I just kind of shows that they are they are planning ahead and then The big updates had had a lot to do with Updates to their website and there's gonna be a ton of good information coming out on the website very soon So stay tuned to that undying undying dick games calm I didn't want them to rush something out just for me or delay something just for me So just keep an eye on that website and then I'm predecessor this week French created a new visual Option menu that so you know doesn't matter what kind of computer you have you can raise and lower the settings and That was present before but he's put way more options in now. It's all part of Him optimizing everything French is doing a lot of work Optimizing the map and optimizing the entire experience. So that's really good stuff And then they also they've been working on those the jungle buffs The red buff is finished the red buff gives attack damage and also a damage modifier So instead of just attack power like if you're a mage and you pick it up You'll still get some more damage off of using the red buff and then the blue buff it only gives mana for now they're going to try and They're going to try and have it give CDR in the future, but they don't have that quite figured out So right now just the blue buff just gives mana. So that's about it for this week Sorry, I don't have a follow on video this time.  Have a good one


Warning! If you go out and see underwater, you may experience heavy signs of deja vu, as often times this film is a lot like other films you've seen already. The synopsis in a nutshell, or in this case a subterrarian laboratory, is simple. A group of scientists seven miles under the ocean are drilling for who the hell knows what, the plot doesn't tell you, the script doesn't tell you, but they find more than they bargained when earthquakes and possibly something more take the lives of many of the members, with the few remaining survivors doing their best to get out alive. This is one of those less is more storylines where you pick up little bits here and there as the film progresses. It's a bit likened to gravity where it's a very basic premise, but you're missing out on the beautiful visuals and the lovely Sandra Bullock. Who it does have is Kristen Stewart, Hollywood's still trying to make her the go-to action heroine, I guess. Fresh off the flop that was Charlie's Angels, here she is again in a movie that I presume will also probably not do that well. I don't know though, the general populace likes these types of movies, these survival horror films, so maybe it'll do okay, I'm not sure. I guess I should kind of do a precursor to all of this, or I should have. I don't go to movies that I want to hate on, because I pay money to see them, and I like movies. I don't hate movies if I do a funny rant or something on a film like the Emoji movie. It's not because I intended on hating it. It's because I have kids, and one of them wanted to go to that film, which is the only reason I went to it. Now this is one of those movies where I had no interest in it, I wouldn't have seen it, but I'm on like a Facebook group where you can get free screeners to films. So once in a while I get free screeners and I go and I would have saw Cats had I got that ticket stub sent my way, but no, I'm not going to Cats, I'm not going to bash on it, it looks like complete trash, why would I waste two hours of my time seeing that thing? As funny as it could have possibly been to review. All I knew before I headed underwater was that Kristen Stewart was in it. I saw maybe a 20 second, you know, one of those like spaz frantic trailers on Twitter, the trailer before the trailer, the pre trailer, and then there was like this conspiracy theory that it might be tied to Cloverfield.  It is not. And you should have known that going in.  One, it's not by the same company, the same studio, so they don't even have the rights to make a Cloverfield movie. And two, it's got TJ Miller in it who was in Cloverfield. He was the camera guy was like, I think it was this first movie. So it'd be really weird if they had HUD back playing an entirely different character. That being said, I can understand why people did think that as this movie does very much feel like a Cloverfield want to be in a sense. The plot is incredibly bare bones. They do a lot of Easter eggs here and there, a lot of little newspaper snippets, a lot of super fast flashing of text on the screen. Much like this movie, even the intro is something you've seen a ton of times. It's got all the fast moving texts, the triple artificial zoom ins on documents, you know, layer upon layer of Photoshop art kind of going this way and that. So high tech, you know, blueprints and schematics and things just moving across the screen and none of it really means anything. I'm being pretty negative right out of the gates on this film, but I wouldn't actually call it a bad movie. There's some fun to be had here. It's popcorn entertainment. I was never really, I rolled my eyes a couple of times, I guess, but there was nothing really that bothered me. The only thing that got on my nerves really was the fact that I've seen so many movies that this just felt like a me too of four or five different ones. And it doesn't really do anything out of on its own to stand out from the pack. If you're going to borrow and steal from other films, at least do it well. And that's the other problem is this doesn't do anything very good. A lot of stuff is just kind of like surface level, pun intended, and it never really goes deep enough. Early on, we see that Kristen Stewart's character Nora has this dog tag of sorts, this necklace around her and it kind of gets stuffed under her like sports bra swimsuit. So I know Kristen Stewart for the fans of her physically, you get to see her in underwear in a bra for a good portion of the film. I'd say a good 25% of her screen time is in very little. I don't know if the director Hollywood was trying to make me like turned on by this, but I wasn't. It was just kind of like that kind of reminds me of my body when I was a 14 year old prepubescent boy. As I was saying though, she has that necklace and she keeps clutching it. It's just such on the nose filmmaking. She's clutching this thing constantly and you're just waiting for this reveal later.  You expect some deeper understanding to come out of it or some deeper meaning, but there's nothing. It's just there's nothing here is the problem, I guess. Let's talk about the things I did enjoy about the film. One, it moves really quick. I think it's under two hours, which is fantastic for me. I'm so sick of these movies that really overstay their welcome. Underwater has a lane, it's going down it. It's kind of this, this, you know, thriller suspense underwater stuff I thought was really pretty. I mean, the whole movie takes place underwater, the whole movie. Like visually I was impressed. It's tough to film things underwater. They did a good job with the atmosphere and with some of the CG work. I didn't really think it looked bad at any point. The action kind of varies. There's some really cool moments. The suits that they wear, they reminded me of the Gears of War. If you're into the video games, the Gears of War suits that Dom and those guys wore. And then there was one scene later on where they have these kind of weird weapons that they rarely use. But when they do, there's a scene that comes up. And I don't know if it's just because of the atmosphere of the shot or just what happened. It reminded me of the game Dead Space. And then I was bummed out that this whole movie wasn't like the game Dead Space. If you're looking for a lot of cool kills, gruesome stuff, you're going to the Ron movie as well. There's really only one or two, I think, and nothing's really. There's like one cool kill. And that's about it. There's tons of jump scares. If you're like jump scares, come to this movie. I think they did like seven at a row at one point. It was like jump scare, 10 seconds, jump scare. There was a heavy set gal next to me. And anytime there was a jump scare, I thought for sure she was going to punch me in the face.  Like some of her popcorn goes up and her hands just like just grazes along my cheek. Just wants to get it. Just teasing it. Director William Mubank really wanted Kristen Stewart to be kind of the Sigourney Weaver of this film though. Kind of the badass taking charge. She's not qualified to lead a crew, but that's where she's at. It doesn't work for me. Kristen Stewart's not bad in this. She's got some range. She's got some emotion. I think she does a very solid job. I just don't see her as a leading lady. She's better off as like the number two or number three supporting actress. T.J. Miller's in this. He's your staple comic relief T.J. Miller character. There's not much more to say than that.  He has some that doesn't. It's fine. It is just this movie across the board. It feels like it was made on a conveyor belt. It's like we need a comic relief T.J. Miller. We need a strong female lead, Kristen Stewart. End of the day, I'd pass on this film. It reeks of the type of movie you'd see for free on Netflix or HBO Go or whatever you use to stream. It's probably going to be there for free in four or five months. I just wait. If you're looking for a scary, you know, survival movie, I'd watch The Descent again. And if you haven't seen The Descent, watch The Descent. That's a that's a sweet movie. This also kind of reminded me of Daylight. Anybody in show of hands, familiar with Daylight came out of the 90s, sliced alone has to lead a band of characters out of a tunnel that has collapsed. And I believe that the catch phrase he had was, there's always a chance. I just remember it's awesome because he has a glow stick at one point. And you know, you have to like shake it or whack it to light it up. He's like, he does it in the most masculine over the top ways. Like you really had to strike this thing at its core to get it to start up. Daylight's fun. I haven't seen it in like 15 years, but I'm sure it's still, I'm sure it's still fun. So watch that too. Watch that. Watch The Descent in Daylight instead of this. I saved you money and I gave you a good experience.


Hi! Remington from Southern Shotty 3D here excited to be on the official Blender YouTube channel to let you know that there's a new version of Blender out Blender 2.83, meaning that we're going to cover all the new features in less than five minutes. If you'd like to see a full list of the dev notes check out the link in the description below but for now let's get started. Blender's amazing grease pencil tool just got even better. With a complete overhaul of the drawing engine you'll see massive FPS improvements especially on large scenes. One of the most exciting updates is the use of lights with grease pencil objects. You can now add lights to your scenes for some really unique and dynamic effects. Overall the grease pencil user interface has been refined greatly. There are way too many changes to the list out in this video but the overall user experience has been improved with a focus on efficiency and ease of use. A few new cool operators include merged similar materials to reduce excess materials and reset a fill transform operation, improvements to color palettes, and a cool new tool is the vertex paint mode tools making it easy to paint vertices in your scenes quickly. This is an exciting new way to save time in painting your grease pencil objects. This also gives you the ability to color strokes independently of their material, something not possible before. There's also a new transform fill tool to adjust UVs and a tint tool for adding vertex color. No need to go outside anymore because virtual reality is coming to Blender. This is cool. The first milestone is scene inspection allowing you to move around your scene and VR some controls. This is great for directors, clients, and briefings. The back end uses OpenXR which is a new standard for virtual augmented and mixed reality. Currently it supports Windows mixed reality in Oculus and it works on the Linux as well. The new object type volume is perfect for simulation junkies and foggy scenes. OpenVDB files can now be imported and rendered with this new volume object. They are added to your scene through the add menu just like any other object or you can drag VDB files right into the viewport. There's a wireframe in solid mode to give you awesome previews making it easier than ever to work with these files in the viewport. By default it renders with the principle volume shader which of course you can change if you want. There are plans to continue with developing this feature and adding modifier support in the future. More good news for Blender simulations. Hair now has the same collision engine as the cloth engine yielding much more reliable and realistic collisions and now you can finally add all those luscious locks to your characters and make them even more beautiful. The cloth self-collision has been optimized with overall improvements seeing a 15 to 20 percent increase. Fluid system has had a lot of bug fixes and usability improvements including improved baking speeds and loading times for particle systems. Blender sculpting tools weren't already amazing enough they just got even better. Of course there is the amazing cloth brush which blew up the internet already and it has mass dampening and radius controls mixed with physics solver and a little bit of magic to generate incredibly realistic and satisfying cloth wrinkles. Once again proof that wizards are real and that they are staffed by Blender. There's now mesh boundary auto masking option to protect the boundaries of the mesh when sculpting cloth. A new tool called the clay thumb brush has been added simulating that you're deforming the clay with your fingers. There are lots of changes to other brushes most notably the layer brush was completely redesigned to improve artifacts, multi-res and masking support. Brushes have separate normal and area radiuses now to achieve better behavior when working on curved surfaces. There are now face sets, a new system to control the visibility state of the mesh in sculpting and paint modes. Intended to provide more control with complex shapes and overlapping surfaces, boxel remesh can now be previewed by pressing shift r which is a lot faster than constantly mashing control z after a bad remesh. Freestyle is now its own past. This is great for NPR users looking to have more control over their line work and post. Lots of little changes to improved modeling modifiers. 2.83 really is a massive user experience update. One overlooked feature that has a lot of potential is the fact that a voxel mode has been added to the remesh modifier. This allows you to remesh live meaning you combine and mash objects together to get some really fun results for quirky little characters. Multi resolution has been rewritten from scratch to solve artifacts. Curve editing has seen extruding tool improvements and now you won't duplicate points but instead extrude on contingent selected segments. Metaballs can now be instanced via mesh vertices and faces. In addition, every modifier that can be limited to vertex groups can have their effect inverted as well. Adaptive sampling has been added to cycles. This feature smartly increases samples counts only in the areas where it's needed. This can reduce the overall render time by 10 to 30%. It's enabled with the adaptive sampling setting in the sampling panel. Optic viewport denoising has been added meaning that cycles now supports denoising in the viewport with AI acceleration. The noise and wave texture now have a roughness input to blend between smoother and rougher noise patterns. EV now supports more passes making it a much more viable for final rendering with its ease of compositing. Light caches have been updated with a cube map array system not only looking better but it also solves light leaking issues. However, this means if you have an old EV project with light maps you'll have to rebake them when you open them in 2.83. Hair geometry now supports alpha hash and clip modes for transparency with shadow blend modes as well meaning you can have your EV hair look closer to their results in cycles. If blender couldn't already do enough it's taking over video editing with a variety improvements to its sequencer including a new toolbar, selection handles, disk cache, and other various improvements. With hundreds of bug fixes and lots of other minor features and improvements as usual this is a great update and this release is a great closure for the 2.8 series paving the way to an even greater 2.9 which will be coming out in just a few months. Join the development fund now to fund the development of blender and all these amazing updates.


The IEA's International Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Power in the 21st century kicks off on October 30th in Abu Dhabi. The conference is going to provide a platform for decision makers and policy makers to come together and discuss some of the challenges that might be holding the greater implementation of nuclear power back in the world. Thirty countries operate about 450 nuclear power reactors worldwide. Another 57 reactors are under construction and are expected to begin operations in the coming years. Many countries expect nuclear power to play an increasingly important role in improving nuclear energy security and mitigating climate change. The IEA is starting a new project with Cuba to combat the Zika virus using a nuclear technique. This is the first time the island will test the sterile insect technique to reduce the number of mosquitoes capable of carrying the virus. We have chosen this technique because compared to conventional techniques, we see certain advantages. For example, it doesn't leave a residue like fumigation. It is a method that serves to control and doesn't completely eliminate the plague. That is, it maintains a certain balance. It is not a mid-environment. The sterile insect technique is a type of insect bird control which uses radiation to sterilize male mosquitoes and reduce the insect's numbers. We consider this as one additional new tool that could be used to integrate with the conventional methods in order to try to reduce these mosquito populations and in such a way try to reduce the transmission of Zika. Cuba plans to start trial releases in Havana at the beginning of 2018. This week, Austria celebrates its national day. Did you know that Austria provided the IEA with its current headquarters in Vienna? For the peace in the world and for the future, for the safe future of your youth. In this spirit I hand over to the international organizations of this big house.


Tasmania is marketed by one of the advertising companies, I'm not sure, as serene, green, clean, pristine, and that's absolutely right. The four words. Yeah, and somebody was telling me the other day, you can smell Antarctic from here. So I think, yeah, you can. Yeah, it's a very clean place. It's a very beautiful place. Australia is the right place to risk it. I think you have a sort of amalgamation of cultures here. You get everything, like the kid gets raised in all kinds of atmosphere. He gets exposed to different languages, different people. And he can imbibe, you know, the quality of different cultures. And hopefully he gets up to a good human being and to have that quality of mateship. And as we have described before, he gets a fair go. So I think that is very, very important. International medical graduates play a very significant role in the delivery of health in this country. Chances are, if an Australian is sick or injured, whether they go to a private practice or a hospital, it's quite probable that they will come in contact with an international medical graduate. And certainly in rural and remote areas, very, very likely that the doctor who is providing care will be an international medical graduate. I was at work and I got something in my eye and yeah, we flushed it out and it just doesn't feel right. Since coming to Australia, my career plans changed a little bit. My initial interest was in surgery back in the UK. But having come over to a slightly different system where I found the emergency department much more interesting, just the way that it's set up and the kind of government controls on the emergency department make it a much more interesting place to work over here. I'm now planning on training in emergency medicine. Just going to pop some orange dye in your eye, OK? Accessing the training programs in Australia has seemed much easier than it has in the UK. Of course, things like surgery is unbelievably competitive everywhere. But it seems here that the options are a bit more flexible than they are perhaps back in the UK. OK, you can sit back. Job done. All right. It's important that the public has confidence in the standards of the international medical graduates. And because of that, there are rules, regulations and processes that have to be met for a doctor coming into this country able to work to show that they have met the standards which would make them show that they are practicing at the equivalent standard that we would expect from our own graduates. Well, certainly, having a baby in Australia was great, you know, good healthcare system. So, you know, it worked well. And Australia in general is just a really nice place to live. It's a really easy place to live. The quality of life is excellent and cost of living is fairly comparable to most places. The nice thing in terms of medicine in particular is that it certainly is one of the more forward-thinking countries in terms of wages and work hours that over the last few years they've become quite conscious of the safe working hours for especially junior doctors.  There's a lot of support and the patients are quite used to getting seen and getting treated by IMGs. So, I have worked in the emergency department for quite some time and it was lovely working there, meeting new people, working with the staff. You get a lot of cooperation. Hello again, Mrs. Page. I'm Helen, we met earlier. Are you all right if I have another quick look at you and see how you're getting on? I'm really happy here socially, definitely financially and in terms of the training that's offered to me I'm much happier here in the job that I'm doing at the moment than the job that was on offer to me back in the UK. And breathe normally, that's lovely. I'm the son of post-war immigrants to Australia. I've got first-hand experience of how immigration enriches and improves a country and the movement of international medical graduates to Australia is another example of how that occurs.


What's up everybody, Jason here for jazzyinfragespeaks.com. We just sold out a little filler that gives away a $1,500 mixer spot for the Flirsa Giveaway Basketball Mixer with this 2021 Panini Fast Break Basketball One Box Break number five, two random teams each. And the way this works is first we do the break. Randomize the customer names and teams. You get two random teams, so we'll double up your names. Remember, no better in common ship but everything else does. Then at the end of the break we'll take all 15 customer names and randomize them and the top name gets the $1,500 mixer spot. So again, here's a dice roller, here's a customer name. So we're gonna double up these names here. Boom, all right. There's the teams. Then only for the randomizer, we're just gonna keep the customer names there by itself like that. So don't have to double up the names there. So let's do the break first. Let's roll it. We got ourselves a three and a six nine times. One, two, three, four, five, six, six, seven, eight. Sean Maddick down to Timothy. Three and a six nine times, nine times. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine times. Clippers is down to the Portland Trailblazers. All right, so I'll name out the teams but there's no trades right now. I'll name out the teams but there's no trades right now. I'll name out the teams but there's no trades right now. So Sean Maddick of the Clippers, Cal with the Heat, Sean with the Warriors, Timothy with the Nets, Brian with the Hawks, Mark with the Mavericks, Timothy with the Wizards, Sean with the Rockets, Dean with the Knicks, Brian Magnus, Las Malmojo with the 76ers, Sean Maddick with the Lakers. Timothy with the Raptors and Pelicans, Cal with the Celtics, Sean with the Pistons Thunder, Dean with the Nuggets, Brian Magnus with the Spurs Suns, Timothy with the Magic Utah Jazz, Mark with the Hornets, Brian with the Cavs, Timothy with the Pacers as well as the Bucks, Brian with the Grizzlies and Bulls, Timothy with the Kings, Brian Frank with the T-Wills and Timothy with the Blazers. So, I'll give you guys a quick look at your teams again just so you guys can see them. All right guys. Prison fast break. All righty guys, good luck. There's Lamello right off the bat. Little base. Aaron Gordon, number to 125. Also guys, who has the Charlotte Hornets, I don't even remember. Mark, there you go, man. Disco James Harden. Nice round, the Juice of Nurchets. Ooh, we got a bronze Zuba. Those are out of 20, I believe. Nine out of 20. Theo Maladon and Isaac Acoro. Think of that as your variation. There you go. Cleveland with that one. And Brian Magnus, downtown Steph Curry. Theo Maladon. Blue Tyrese Maxi of a color match. 76 is going to Brian Magnus, 33 out of 175. Zion Fearless. Yanis Disco. DeAndre Hunter, 125. Pugosovski. White screen Steph Curry. Kevin Looney. Zion Second year. Danny of Deja. Hassan White's Eye, 175. Tim Hardaway for the Warriors. Fast break signatures. Sean Maddock with the Warriors. Brian Forbes. Jimmy Butler, purple. Pressure of the Chua and a little retro. Anthony Davis. Obi Toppin. John T. Murray. Furkan. All right, there you go, guys. Little box there. Now let's give away the one spot in the Flir mixer, guys. All right, so again, just the 15 names I bought in originally. Here's the dice roll, here's the customer names again. Good luck, roll. Four to one, five times, five times. Number one gets it. One, two, three, four, five. Mark at the top after five times. Wow. Four to one, five times. Congratulations, Mark. You just won a spot in the Flir set mixer where we're giving that away. And again, coming up next is the next fillet that's sold out, which is the Prismotipak cello. I'm gonna repost this one back up and that's the last filler we're doing. Plus the one spot straight up and the absolute break that's still there. So appreciate it, guys. Jaspy'scasebreaks.com.