Stories and content in Weird Darkness can be disturbing for some listeners and is intended for mature audiences only. Parental discretion is strongly advised. If cop shows and forensic dramas have taught us one thing, it's that serial killers are a breed apart from other human beings. They are the monsters that hide in the shadows, the diabolical predators of otherwise peaceful times.  So when cases of homicide committed by children make the news, they fascinate the viewers and stay in the public consciousness long after the trials have ended. Murder itself is such an extreme crime that even what motivates adult killers can remain mysterious. Getting to the bottom of what pushes a child to commit the heinous act is even more difficult. Many such crimes involve children attacking those younger than them, usually with an age gap of six to eight years. Needing to feel powerful comes into some of the cases, as does curiosity, simply wanting to know what killing feels like. I'm Darren Marlar and this is Weird Darkness. Welcome, Weirdos. This is Weird Darkness. Here, you'll find stories of the paranormal, supernatural, legends, lore, crime, conspiracy, mysterious, macabre, unsolved and unexplained. While you're listening, you might want to check out the Weird Darkness website. At WeirdDarkness.com, you can find paranormal and horror audiobooks I've narrated, streaming video of horror hosts and old horror movies. Plus, you can visit the Hope in the Darkness page if you're struggling with depression, anxiety or thoughts of suicide. You can find all of that and more at WeirdDarkness.com. Coming up in this episode of Weird Darkness. You can teach a dog to roll over and fetch. You can teach a cat to use the toilet. Lions and tigers have been trained to jump through hoops of fire to thrill spectators at circuses worldwide. And even a gorilla has been taught some basic sign language. But would you believe there was once a horse that could do arithmetic? William Steed was a newspaper editor and journalist in the 1890s. His beat wasn't the fashion scene or stock market, nor was it the arts district or even politics. He covered the paranormal, and it wasn't hard to come up with stories because all he had to do was to call up someone from the underworld for an exclusive interview. If you move into an old house, it always feels awkward at first. After a while, though, it begins to feel like home. For some people, if the house is a bit older, perhaps that odd feeling of being watched never really goes away. But if your house was built 270 years ago, you probably should just assume you've got a spook or two already residing there before you sign the mortgage. As a listener of true crime podcasts, you likely are more than familiar with names like H. H. Holmes, Richard Ramirez, and Gary Ridgway. But what happens when the serial killer hasn't even reached adolescence? We'll look at some chilling murders that were carried out by children, which will change the way you look at youthful adolescents from now on. And are there traits you can look for in a child that might indicate if they'll become a killer later in life? We'll look at three traits believed to be indicators.  We all know of Ted Bundy, Ed Gein, Jeffrey Dahmer, and John Wayne Gacy, some of the most notorious serial killers of the 20th century. These murderers have even inspired movies and TV shows based on their callous acts. Their victims suffered gruesome killings and the public understood that although the killers might have faced psychological problems, they were still adults. But what happens when the killers haven't even hit puberty? Murder can be an act so horrific and inconceivable that many of us fail to understand why someone would do it. Some of us even forget that there is no age limit to becoming a killer. There are teens and youth who seek out their victims and take their lives brutally and violently, sometimes without remorse, and in ways we can barely believe.  Accused of luring young boys into the local woods where he would then beat them with his fist, belt, or knife, Jesse Pomeroy is alleged to have killed nine people. He began to torture other children when he was only 11 years old. During the winter and fall of 1871, Pomeroy trapped and attacked seven younger boys. Pomeroy would strip and tie the boys up, severely beating them, sometimes even poking pins into their flesh. He had distinguishable features, a hair lip and one completely white eye, so identifying him was easy. He was eventually caught and was sent to reform school. He was supposed to stay until he reached the age of 18 but was released after he completed a year and a half of his sentence. Once released, Pomeroy didn't just want to inflict pain, he wanted to kill. The deaths that finally put him in prison were that of a 10-year-old girl, Mary Curran from South Boston, found in his basement, and a four-year-old boy, Horace Mullen, found mutilated near a marsh. At the time of his arrest, Pomeroy was 14 and confessed to the murder of Mullen. When police asked him if he killed the boy, Pomeroy replied, I suppose I did. Eventually Pomeroy confessed to having a total of 27 other victims. Police discovered the remains of 12 other bodies in his old home. When convicted of first-degree murder, Pomeroy, also known as the Boston Boy Fiend, became the youngest person convicted of first-degree murder in the state of Massachusetts. It's really no surprise that Mary Bell turned out the way she did. Her mother was a 17-year-old prostitute when she had Mary and was often absent from their home during Mary's childhood. Betty Bell, Mary's mother, married Billy Bell although it's unclear if he was Mary's biological father. Billy was a habitual criminal, often arrested for robbery. The Bell home was located in the economically depressed Scotswood area of Newcastle, where domestic violence and criminal behavior were the norm. It's no surprise that Mary quickly began engaging in her own crimes, attacks on other children, vandalism and theft. It didn't take long before Mary started searching for heavier crimes. Mary Bell committed the first of two shocking murders on the day before her 11th birthday. In May of 1968, Mary strangled a four-year-old boy in a derelict house before leaving notes claiming responsibility in a nursery she and a friend had broken into. A month later and joined by that same friend, Mary strangled a three-year-old boy in the same area as the first killing. She returned to the body and carved the letter M into the boy's stomach along with scratching his legs and mutilating his genitals. Mary was convicted of manslaughter and released in 1980. She made headlines again after being released from prison and won a high court battle to have her own anonymity and that of her daughters extended for life. As a result, any court order that permanently protects the identity of someone is now known as a Mary Bell order. Charles Charlie Starkweather was brought up in a respectable home with well-behaved siblings. He was the third of seven. In contrast, Starkweather's time in school was unpleasant because he was often teased and bullied for his limitations. He was born with genuvarum, a leg dysformity, a speech impediment and also suffered from severe myopia. The only place he excelled was gym class and he began to bulk up as a result. With his newfound physique, Starkweather transformed from bullied to bully and went from the most well-behaved teenager to the most troubled student. By 1956, 18-year-old Starkweather was introduced to Carol Ann Fugate, who was 13 at the time, and the two quickly hit it off. Gradually, Charlie convinced himself that he had to become a criminal in order to gain money and respect. On December 1957, Charlie committed his first murder and at once felt euphoric and peaceful. The day after Charlie robbed and murdered his first victim, Robert Colvert, he admitted everything to Carol. His confession caused their bond to become even more intense. It would also lead to their mass-murdering road trip. Charlie, 19-years-old at this time, along with his 14-year-old girlfriend, carried out the two-month spree that inspired films like California and Natural Born Killers. The teens strangled, stabbed, sexually assaulted and shot 11 different victims between December 1957 and January 1958 across the states of Nebraska and Wyoming, including his girlfriend's family. The day of their final murder, the duo ran into law enforcement and Starkweather's girlfriend confessed, resulting in their high-speed capture. Starkweather was sentenced to death by electric chair 17 months after he was arrested. On February 20, 2009, the then 11-year-old Jordan Brown murdered his father's 26-year-old fiance, Kenzie Hoek, who was eight months pregnant at the time. Her unborn son was also killed. While the soon-to-be mother was sleeping in her bed in their new beaver Pennsylvania farmhouse, Brown shot her in the back of the head, using a gun given to him by his father. Hoek's youngest daughter alerted nearby adults to the situation after Brown had gotten on the school bus. Police arrived later that day to find a shotgun in the house with the smell of burnt gunpowder. Jordan was interviewed by Pennsylvania State Police twice the day of the incident before being arrested the following morning. It was later confirmed that Hoek was killed by a youth model Harrington and Richardson 20-gauge shotgun. Prosecutors speculated that Brown killed his stepmother because he was angered by the pending birth of a new sibling and was jealous about the attention his stepsisters received. Initially, Brown was to be tried as an adult, but was eventually found guilty of first-degree murder as a juvenile. In 2018, Brown was exonerated as the court determined that the evidence could have been planted by an unknown assailant and thus was insufficient to find him culpable beyond a reasonable doubt. On the day that 14-year-old Shirley Wolfe helped murder a great grandmother in her condominium, Wolfe wrote in her journal, Today, Cindy and I ran away and killed an old lady. It was lots of fun. Wolfe had known 15-year-old Cindy Collier less than a day when they decided to knock on various doors of Collier's condominium development in Auburn, California. The girls used their innocent demeanor to their advantage in order to get in the apartments of older residents. They used tactics like asking for directions, a glass of water, or to use the phone. Some of the senior citizens were not fooled and felt an unsettling presence when they met the girls. After two older women saw the girls, they immediately locked their windows and doors. However, the kind and helpful Anna Brackett, an 86-year-old former seamstress, decided to invite the girls into her two-bedroom condo, unaware that it would cost her her life. After Brackett let them in, they brutally stabbed her for her car. Wolfe grabbed Brackett by her throat and threw her to the floor, while Collier handed her a knife from the kitchen. Wolfe repeatedly stabbed her neck until she was dead. Before they left, the girls ransacked the condo for money and the car keys. No one could believe that the teenage girls were responsible for the heinous act, but when the Placer County Sheriff's deputies interviewed Wolfe, she confessed within minutes. Later, Collier affirmed, after we did it, we wanted to do another one.  The two were found guilty of first-degree murder. Nathan Leopold and his lover, Richard Loeb, confessed to the kidnapping and murder of Bobby Franks, which they claimed to have committed solely for the experience. Before that incident, Leopold and Loeb had racked up a laundry list of crimes. By November 1923, Leopold and Loeb had already performed several burglaries together and set fires a few times. Their criminal behavior was fueled by Nietzsche's concept of the Superman. Leopold was furious that their misdeeds had yet to earn them media attention, so the two spent seven months planning a bigger crime that would prove they weren't just above the law, they were too smart to get caught. They spent the winter months of 1924 planning the crime to the smallest detail. They would kidnap a child and ask for a $10,000 ransom. They had even decided how they would request the money. The wealthy University of Chicago students eventually kidnapped and murdered a 14-year-old boy in May 1924 as an affirmation of their intellectual supremacy. The pair spent nearly two hours driving around the streets of the south side of Chicago looking for a possible victim until they spotted Bobby Franks. Franks was Loeb's cousin. He knew that Frank's father would be able to pay the ransom. After offering the boy a ride and taking a chisel to his head, they dumped his body. After a failed attempt to collect the ransom, a pair of glasses belonging to Leopold discovered near the body linked the murder to the boys. Leopold and Loeb were convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison plus 99 years. Fascinated with poison from a young age, Graham Young would poison his father, stepmother, younger sister, several classmates and at one point even himself. He used poison that made them violently ill. The symptoms included vomiting, diarrhea and excruciating stomach pain. When he was only 14 in November 1961, Young served his sister Winifred a cup of tea exposed to poison that would later cause her hallucinations. She was taken to the hospital where doctors came to the conclusion that she had consumed the poisonous Atropa Belladonna. Young's father was suspicious of his son but unable to find anything incriminating in his room. Regardless, he warned his son to stop using chemicals. Young eventually killed his stepmother and after the 15-year-old was sent to a psychiatrist, the police were brought in. Young landed himself in a psychiatric facility for people who have committed criminal offenses and was diagnosed with a personality disorder. Dubbed the T-Cup Poisoner, he killed a fellow inmate and poisoned several staff members before being released 9 years later deemed fully recovered. He would eventually land back in prison in the early 1970s to live out the rest of his days after poisoning at least 7 more people and killing one. David Brom is known as a mass murderer, having killed nearly his entire family, parents, brother and sister with an axe on a February morning in 1988. The murders happened after Brom got into a fight with his father in their Minnesota home the night before. The morning after the murders, the 16-year-old skipped school and convinced a fellow student to do so as well, bragging to her about what he did in graphic detail. He detailed the ways he killed his family with an axe and the fact that his father had struggled during the attack. Brom informed the student that he had gotten into an argument with his father at about 11.30 p.m. over the music he was listening to. He then stayed awake until 3 a.m. and entered his parents' room and killed his father first. He attacked his brother and killed his mother and sister last. The news reached his school's administration who notified police. Initially, Brom's case was referred to the juvenile court system because of his age. However, due to the severity of the crimes, Brom was sent into the adult judicial system. Brom's defense was insanity and much of the trial and media attention focused on whether or not Brom was legally insane at the time of his crimes. In October 1989, Brom was convicted of first-degree murder and was given three consecutive life sentences. He remains in prison to this day. In February 1993, Robert Thompson and John John Venables, both 10 years old at the time, were skipping school and decided to lure a young, two-year-old boy away from his mom. CCTV showed the boys observing children, most likely searching for a victim. Throughout their time in the shopping center, the boys were also seen stealing various items, sweets, a troll doll, batteries, and a can of blue paint. Eventually, the boys spotted James Bulger and decided to approach the boy while his mother was distracted. The boys led Bulger by the hand out of the mall, where they planned to push him into oncoming traffic. However, the boys decided to travel two and a half miles through Walton Liverpool to a set of railroad tracks. During their walk through Liverpool, the boys were seen with Bulger by a total of 38 people. Bulger had a bump on his forehead and was crying, but bystanders did not intervene. Once they reached the railroad tracks, the boys stripped Bulger of his clothes, stuffed batteries into his mouth, threw paint in his eye and bricks and stones at his body, and dropped a 22-pound iron bar on him before weighing his body down on the tracks using rocks so a passing train would mutilate the boy's body. The police used CCTV footage to track the two child murderers down, and the two boys were found guilty, becoming the youngest individuals to be convicted of murder in the 20th century. When Eric Smith was younger, he was considered a loving and funny boy. That quickly changed as he got older. Smith had been diagnosed with intermittent explosive disorder, a mental disorder that causes individuals to act out violently and unpredictably. It was a rare disorder that was even rarer at Smith's age. Smith was a loner and was often bullied because of his appearance as he had protruding, low-set ears, thick glasses, red hair and freckles. It seems this led to Smith's suppressed rage later taken out on his victim, Derek Robie. At age 13, Eric Smith murdered Derek Robie, a four-year-old boy, after luring him into the woods while they were on their way to the same summer camp. After luring the young boy into the woods, Smith hit him over the head with a rock, strangled him, and sodomized him with a tree limb, which Smith would later say he used to confirm the boy was dead. The body was found within hours after the little boy's mother reported him missing. Within the same week, Smith confessed to his family. He was charged with second-degree murder and is currently in a medium-security prison in New York State. Known as the Warwick Slasher, Craig Chandler Price was arrested for four murders. Price killed his first victim when he was just 13 years old after breaking into her home, only two houses down from his own. He stabbed the 27-year-old woman living there 58 times with a kitchen knife. At the age of 15, he would brutally stab three more neighbors, a mother, Joan Heaton, nearly 40, and her two young daughters. With his first murder unsolved, Price was able to commit his second horrific crime. Similarities in the killings led police to bring in the FBI to investigate a possible serial killer. At first, tying Price to the scene seemed impossible, but then an observant detective noticed a cut on Price's hand. When he was arrested, Price calmly confessed and showed no remorse for the killings. He even described the night he was in the Heaton's house, how he bit Heaton's face as he knifed her and mimicked the final cries of her dying daughters. He was sentenced as a minor and upon his potential release, bragged that he would make history before earning an additional 10-25 years for various instances of criminal behavior while in prison. At one time, he was to be in jail until 2020. But on April 4, 2017, Price stabbed fellow inmate Joshua Davis at the Savani Correctional Institution in Live Oak, Florida with a 5-inch homemade knife. He was sentenced to an additional 25 years. Peter Woodcock was a Canadian serial killer and child rapist who showed signs of psychopathy at a young age. By the time he was a teenager, Woodcock was using his bike to wander around the edges of Toronto and select his victims. He'd ride his bike and evolve a fantasy in which he led a gang of 500 invisible boys called the Winchester Heights gang. His foster parents were aware that he spent time wandering around on his bike, but were shocked to discover that Woodcock had been sexually assaulting children. He assaulted many children and would eventually kill three, all under the age of 10, between 1956 and 1957. The murders were carried out by strangulation. Woodcock would also beat his victims and forcibly insert objects into their privates before killing them. He was caught after being seen cycling away from his last victim and found not guilty by reason of insanity. Woodcock would be sent to a maximum security mental health centre. As he seemed less dangerous over time, the man was released to a lower level facility. In that facility, Woodcock, now going by the name David Michael Kroger, fell in love with a fellow patient who rejected his sexual advances. While out on a weekend pass, Kroger convinced a former lover, Bruce Hamill, to help him kill that man. Hamill and Kroger stabbed Dennis Kerr to death. Immediately after the murder, Kroger reported himself to the police. He was transferred back to the high-security facility where he passed away 19 years later. From Jacksonville, Florida, Josh Phillips earned a life sentence for murdering an 8-year-old neighbour in 1998 when he was only 14 years old. Phillips alleges that he was home alone the day Maddie Clifton came over to play baseball. He agreed to play even though he was not allowed to have friends over when his parents weren't home. After he accidentally hit her in the eye with the ball, the young girl began to scream and cry loudly. Knowing that his father would arrive soon and fearing his reaction, Phillips pulled her into the house and strangled her with a phone cord for 15 minutes. He proceeded to hit her with a bat and then stuffed her body under his waterbed mattress. Phillips interacted with his father upon his arrival home for a few minutes before returning to his room. Realising that Clifton was still alive, he stabbed her 11 times to stop her moaning, which finally killed the young girl. He left her body underneath his bed. It was discovered by his mother who thought the waterbed was leaking but came to find it was the young girl's decomposing body. She ran outside the house to contact police who arrested Phillips the very same day at his school. Sandy Charles is perhaps one of the most bizarre child murderers on the list. Charles, along with a young accomplice, murdered a seven-year-old boy after watching the horror movie Warlock. The film follows a Warlock who drinks the liquefied fat of an unbaptised child to gain special powers. The killer teen stabbed and smothered his young victim in the woods, only a few hundred yards from where he was staying with his grandmother in Sinote Crescent, an isolated community in Canada.  He then took the body parts home, cooked and ate them, confessing that he thought drinking boiled down fat from a virgin would give him the power to fly, as shown in the horror film. Charles was suffering bizarre delusions due to schizophrenia, only strengthened by his constant rewatching of Warlock and its sequel. He had contemplated suicide but decided against it when spirits in the room told him that he'd be better off killing someone else. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity and sent to a psychiatric hospital. In April of 2006, the bodies of Mark and Deborah Richardson and their eight-year-old son were found in their home. The murderers were the Richardson's 12-year-old daughter, Jasmine Richardson, and her 23-year-old boyfriend, Jeremy Stanky, who she had met at a punk rock show that same year. The two had an interest in dark horror and creatures like vampires. Stanky even claimed he was a 300-year-old vampire. He told friends he liked the taste of blood and wore a small vial of blood around his neck. Richardson's parents did not approve of Stanky and punished her for dating him because of the age difference. The pair, who were deeply infatuated, refused to be separated. And so, Jasmine Richardson came up with a plan. She proposed the idea to kill her parents so she and Stanky could finally live together. Hours before the murder, the two had watched natural-born killers. During a conversation with an undercover cop while in police custody, Stanky said that the movie was the best love story of all time. Richardson was found guilty of three counts of murder in the first degree and sentenced to the maximum allowance for juveniles, 10 years. Stanky received three life sentences. It is believed that Jasmine Richardson is the youngest person to be convicted of multiple murder in Canada. She was released after serving her full sentence in 2016. Reportedly, she has shown genuine remorse for her crimes. Coming up, can you predict whether or not a child will become a killer? Are there traits you can look for in a child that might indicate if they will become violent later in life? Plus, I'll tell you about Hans Clever, a horse supposedly so intelligent that it could actually do math. These stories and more when Weird Darkness returns. He has been spotted all over the world, but photographic evidence is lacking, as is any scientific proof, but he still exists and is still seen. And now you can search for Bigfoot every month in the Find Bigfoot calendar by Timothy Wayne Williams. Each month, you'll be captivated by an original Timothy Wayne Williams painting. Beautiful, captivating, but within each painting hides a monster. Bigfoot is hiding somewhere in each painting. Search for Bigfoot and invite others to do so as well with the new Find Bigfoot calendar available now at WeirdDarkness.com Wouldn't it be useful if we could identify violent criminals before they harm their first victim? Wouldn't it be incredible if we could observe certain behaviors as serious red flags and figure out a way to treat children who seem to be at the highest risk for future violent behavior? It's almost as if we could answer the most terrifying problem we have as human beings. How do we stop those who seek to harm us in the most brutal ways? Most of those interested in true crime are familiar with a certain three childhood behaviors that immediately spark concern in amateur forensic psychologists. These three behaviors when happening together are known as the McDonald Triad. What the McDonald Triad attempts to do is to predict future sadistic behaviors by identifying certain traits that show in childhood and adolescence. Forensic psychiatrist J. M. McDonald identified three such traits in his 1963 paper The Threat to Kill. They are arson, bedwetting, and animal cruelty. In his paper he wrote about his study of 100 patients who had threatened to kill someone. He found that his patients that exhibited signs of aggression and psychosis were more likely to have a history of the three aforementioned behaviors. In 1966, Daniel Hellman and Nathan Blackman published a study that supported the McDonald Triad. Of the 84 prisoners they worked with, they found that three quarters of the 31 most violent offenders all possessed a history of the behaviors. This triad has blended into the canon of true crime and many of us have taken it as a psychological fact, so what are we talking about when we talk about the McDonald Triad? Arson According to a 2004 paper by Singer and Hensley, fire-starting is an early attempt at releasing anger and aggression. Because some studied serial killers experienced prolonged episodes of humiliation and shaming in childhood, it is proposed that they sought a way to release the negative emotions and rebalance themselves. The study also concluded that arson is not a good predictor of future violence. Cruelty to Animals This is probably the most famous trait that people assume will predict violent behavior. The reason that psychologists believe that children and adolescents torture and kill small animals is also because of humiliation at home. Children cannot fight against their abusers, so they take their anger out on animals that are vulnerable to them. Psychologists right in Hensley studied five cases of serial murderers in 2003 and found that these animal kills are almost like practice for future violence. The methods employed to harm the animals are often similar to the methods that criminals use on their human victims.  It is also indicated that more often than not the children who harmed animals were also victims of parental abuse. Bed Wedding Specifically, unintentional bed wedding during sleep, persistent after the age of five. Many children may wet the bed, but in the context of the McDonald's triad, a child older than five must wet the bed while sleeping at least twice a week for a three-month period. Forensic psychologists call the idea that bed wedding has anything to do with future violent behavior a destructive myth. Though chronic bed wedding is sometimes considered another sign of a child's distress, researchers have not found a solid link between bed wedding and abuse. So how accurate is this hypothesis? McDonald himself began to question his own theory in his 1968 book Homicidal Threats, which I have linked to in the show notes, claiming he could find no true statistical link between the triad and future violent tendencies. Researchers agree. They question whether two small studies can warrant a legitimate theory. More recent studies and analyses seem to show little correlation. Some go as far as to call the triad of behaviors an urban legend. Nonetheless, it has found its way into forensic psychology classes and even into law and order SVU. In 2009, Corey Ryan submitted a master thesis study, which to date is the most extensive review and analysis of violent criminal data from the last half of a century, and she found little to prove that the McDonald triad has any predictive value. It's not that these behaviors aren't signs for concern, they are, but less so for potential future victims and more so for the child exhibiting them. The behaviors described in the McDonald triad are more likely to show that a child may be experiencing severe abuse. The correlation to violent criminal behavior may be that many who do commit violent crimes have a history of childhood abuse and neglect. Forensic psychologist Catherine Ramsland claims that some violent criminals may exhibit one of the traits of the triad, but rarely do they possess all three. Together or alone, the triad behaviors can indicate a stressed child with poor coping mechanisms or a developmental disability Ramsland wrote for Psychology Today. Psychologists worry that the McDonald triad's popularity may cause more distress and stigmatization for children that are labeled as a future threat through behaviors that actually signal abuse of the child. Ramsland continued to say, such a child needs guidance and attention. However, until we design and carry out better empirical studies than we've seen thus far, researchers and media agencies should refrain from stating that the triad identifies a future serial killer. I don't know about you, but I can use a more amusing story right about now, after such a dark beginning to this episode. So let me tell you about clever haunts. In a paved courtyard surrounded by high apartment houses in the northern part of Berlin, a small crowd had gathered to watch an old high school mathematics teacher demonstrate the brilliance of one of his precocious pupils.  To his left stood the pupil, an impressive Russian trotting horse. For more than a decade, Wilhelm von Osten, the instructor, had helped clever Hans, the horse, to develop a number of cognitive skills. Von Osten would ask a question and Hans would answer correctly by nodding his head for a yes or a no, or by tapping his foot to indicate numbers. Clever Hans could show directions by turning his head, could differentiate between left and right, identify colors, read the clock, recognize and identify playing cards, and understand a large number of different concepts. Not only could Hans count, he could perform arithmetic far beyond the fundamentals. How much is two-fifths plus one-half? Von Osten would ask. Hans would answer with nine taps followed by another ten to indicate that the answer was nine-tenths. What's the square root of sixteen? Hans would make four taps. What are the factors of twenty-eight? Hans would tap consecutively, two, four, seven, fourteen, twenty-eight. Hans could even pick up cleverly worded questions. I have a number in mind. I subtract nine and have three as a remainder. What's the number I had in mind? Twelve hoof taps. In the number three, six, five, two, eight, seven, one, four, nine, I place a decimal point after the eight. How many are there now in the hundreds place Von Osten would press on? Hans would reply promptly with five taps. Clever Hans' intelligence wasn't just limited to arithmetic. The horse would astonish crowds by spelling out words and names of people with taps where one tap is an A, two taps a B, and so on. Hans also gave evidence of excellent memory and apparently carried the entire yearly calendar in his head. You could ask him if the eighth day of a month comes on a Tuesday, what's the date for the following Friday? And he would tell you. The versatility of Hans in other directions was baffling. He would recognize tones, recognize people and photographs, tap out the time of the day, distinguish between straw and felt hats, know the different colors, and so on. By some estimates, Hans' mental development was similar to a child of 13 or 14 years. Naturally, Hans aroused curiosity among many psychologists, zoologists and experts in various other fields. This was a time when studies on animal cognition and their mental processes were few and far between. The general consensus was that animals were incapable of exhibiting anthropomorphic intelligence. In no case is an animal activity to be interpreted in terms of higher psychological processes, warned C. Lloyd Morgan, a respected 19th century British psychologist. Morgan believed that higher mental faculties should only be considered as explanations if faculties that stand lower in the scale of psychological evaluation and development could not explain a behavior. This is known as Morgan's Canon and it is a fundamental precept of comparative animal psychology. In the face of rising media attention, the German Board of Education appointed a commission to investigate von Austen's scientific claims. This Hans commission consisted of a veterinarian, a circus manager, a cavalry officer, a number of school teachers, and the director of the Berlin Zoological Gardens. Following extensive testing, the commission concluded in 1904 that no tricks were involved in the horse's performance. As far as they could tell, clever Hans' mental abilities were real. The commission then passed off the evaluation to Oskar Funkst, a young psychologist who worked in the laboratory of the man who headed the commission. Funkst designed a careful set of experiments and began testing Hans. To rule out the possibility that von Austen was secretly feeding Hans the answers, he removed von Austen from the scene and was pleasantly surprised when Hans was able to get the correct answer even when von Austen wasn't the one asking the questions. With the likelihood of fraud out of the way, von Austen began examining whether the horse was getting clues, unknown to the questioner by reading subtle changes in the questioner's demeanor, posture, tone, etc. To confirm this, Funkst kept the answers hidden from the questioner. At once, Hans' accuracy dropped. Oskar Funkst explains the procedure of this test. Mr. von Austen whispered a number in the horse's ear so that none of the persons present could hear. Thereupon, I did likewise. Hans was asked to add the two. Since each of the experimenters knew only his own number, the sum, if known to anyone, could be known to Hans alone. Every such test was immediately repeated with the result known to the experimenters. In 31 tests in which the method was procedure without knowledge, three of the horse's answers were correct, whereas in the 31 tests in which the method was procedure with knowledge, 29 of his responses were correct. Since the three correct answers in the cases in which procedure was without knowledge evidently were accidental, the results of this series of experiments show that Hans was unable to solve arithmetical problems. Funkst also found that when the questioner stood farther away from Hans than normal, the horse had trouble correctly answering the questions. Oskar Funkst wrote, quote, the usual distance was ¼ to ½ meter. This holds for all tests hitherto described. 70 tests which were made for the purpose of discovering the influence of change in distance showed that the reaction of the horse upon the customary signal of the head jerk was accurate up to a distance of 3½ meters. At a distance of 3½ to 4 meters, there suddenly occurred a fall of 60 to 70% in the number of correct responses. At a distance of 4 to 4½ meters, only one-third of the responses were correct. And at a distance beyond 4½ meters, there were no correct responses. The greater number of these tests were made in our presence by Mr. Von Austin, who was under the impression that we were testing the accuracy of the horse's hearing, whereas we were really testing the accuracy of his perception of movements, unquote. Every test Funkst conducted, Hans failed miserably. Even his memory, some people tried to explain Hans' supposed intelligence on muscle memory, was found to be average and unsuitable for performing the astonishing feats that had been claimed for him. After it became evident that the horse was entirely dependent on external stimuli from the questioner, Funkst began observing the questioners instead to understand what kind of clues humans subconsciously gave away. The psychologist immediately noticed that a questioner's breathing, posture and facial expression involuntarily changed each time the hoof tapped. Funkst observed a marked tension in the muscles of the questioner's face and neck as the horse approached the correct answer. As soon as the final correct tap was made, the tension was suddenly released. This provided a cue for Hans that he should stop tapping. Once Funkst learned to read these barely perceptible cues as good as Hans did, he carried out further tests in which he played the part of the horse. Funkst asked his subjects to concentrate upon a particular number. Funkst would then tap out the answers solely by observing the body language of his human subjects. Even more incredible was that the subjects seemed unable to suppress these subtle cues, even when made aware of them. Oscar Funkst's research proved that Clever Hans was an excellent observer who could read the microscopic signals in the face of his master, and this ability greatly exceeded that of the average man. But his intelligence by no means approached that of a human. Oscar Funkst's conclusions that researchers can unknowingly lead a subject is now recognized as widespread in research involving human subjects as well as animals. This is known today as the Clever Hans Effect. To prevent prejudices and foreknowledge from contaminating experimental results, many experiments in the fields of perception, cognitive psychology and social psychology are double blind, where most information about the experiments is withheld from both the researchers and the subjects until after the experiment is complete. The Clever Hans Effect has also been observed in drug sniffing dogs where cues from the handler are transmitted to the dogs resulting in false positives. Despite Funkst's expose, Clever Hans never stopped being a sensation. His owner, Von Austin, continued making tours throughout Germany, drawing crowds wherever he put up a show. Von Austin never charged a dime for these exhibitions. He genuinely believed in Clever Hans' unmatched intelligence. Wilhelm Von Austin died in 1909, after which his horse, Clever Hans, changed owners several times until he was drafted as a military horse at the beginning of World War I in 1914. His fate is unknown, but some believe that Hans was killed in action in 1916. When Weird Darkness Returns, Wilhelm Steed was a newspaper editor and journalist in the 1890s. His beat wasn't the fashion scene or stock market, nor was it the arts district or even politics. He covered the paranormal.  And if you move into an old house, it always feels awkward at first. After a while, though, it begins to feel like home. For some people, if the house is a bit older, perhaps that odd feeling of being watched never really goes away. But if your house was built 270 years ago, you probably should just assume you've got a spook or two already residing there before signing the mortgage papers. These stories are up next. Central Massachusetts is a land of oddities in apparitions. Stories of the strange and paranormal have been passed down from generation to generation. And only the local populace has any idea of just how vast and deep their superstitions run. The world around you is much more than you can touch, taste, smell, see and hear. Some of the stories are funny, some are sad. But all of them give you a taste of what it's like to be from the oddest part of the United States. You can't have a region of the country that has been settled for centuries without getting a few odd tales out of it. Open up a whole new world of fact and fiction that'll leave you with a deep appreciation for the strange and bizarre ghosts and heroes await.  Slightly Odd Fitchburg by Ed Sweeney, now available on Kindle, paperback and audiobook versions on the audiobook page at WeirdDarkness.com. William T. Steed was a Victorian-era newspaper editor and journalist who got swept up in the London spiritualism scene in the 1890s. But he didn't just attend seances and report about his experiences. Steed discovered he had his own psychic abilities. He could receive direct messages from the dead through his hand, a process called automatic writing. His main contact was Julia A. Ames, an American journalist he had befriended years earlier but who had died December 12, 1891. Long before her passing, she and a lifelong friend, Ellen agreed that whoever went to the grave first would send messages to the other from beyond. Sure enough, Ellen claimed to have seen apparitions of Julia standing near her bedside. I know it was Julia and she has come back to me as she promised, Ellen told Steed, but I could not hear her speak and I could not bear to think that she may have come back with a message for me and yet I could not hear what she had to say. Fortunately for Ellen and Julia, Steed was ready to help with his new found automatic writing skills. I offer in case she were willing and able to use my hand as her own to allow Julia to write what message she pleased by that means, Steed explained in the introduction to his book After Death or Letters from Julia, which I have placed a link to in the show notes. Julia took him up on the offer and had plenty to say. Sitting alone with a tranquil mind, I consciously placed my right hand with the pen held in the ordinary way at the disposal of Julia and watched with keen and skeptical interest to see what it would write, Steed added. The first batch of messages Steed received were for Ellen, but later messages were meant for publication to broader audiences. Here is one of Julia's descriptions of the afterlife. All is so new and there are such unexpected samenesses as well as differences, when for instance we wake into the new life we are still in the same world. There are all the familiar things around us, the walls, the pictures, the window, the bed, and the only new things is your own body out of which you stand and wonder how it can be that it is there and that it is no longer you. And then you begin clearly to understand what has happened. It is very much like experiences you have in dreams which, after all, are often due to the same cause, the conscious soul leaving the physical frame which however remains breathing. The first thing you notice that is not the same is the angel. You are the same. I mean that there is no break in your consciousness, your memory, your sex. I was woman in my bodily life and I am woman still. There is no change there, but you are in a manner different." According to Steed's daughter Estella and her medium, Pardo Woodman, the journalist and automatic writer's adventures and spiritualism continued when he took his own trip beyond the veil. Steed's journey began when a journey to the United States went unfinished. He was one of the more than 1,500 people who died on the Titanic in 1912. Surviving witnesses said Steed had helped women and children escape and gave away his life jacket. Several years later, Woodman, an acquaintance of Estella's, developed a knack for automatic writing and began channeling her father. Mr. Woodman never knew my father personally, nor has he come into touch with his writing or with his work in any way. And yet the wording and the phrasing of the messages are my father's, and even the manner of writing is typical of him, Estella wrote in the preface to Steed's The Blue Island, experiences of a new arrival beyond the veil, which I have also linked to in the show notes. In the first chapter, Steed recounts his experience after the sinking of the Titanic. Here's a portion of what Woodman says he had to say. The end came and it was all finished with. It was like waiting for a liner to sail. We waited until all were aboard. I mean, we waited until the disaster was complete. The saved. Saved. The dead. Alive. Then in one hole we moved our scene. It was a strange method of traveling for us all, and we were a strange crew, bound for we knew not where.  Many, knowing what had occurred, were in agony of doubt as to their people left behind, and as to their own future state. What would it hold for them? Would they be taken to see him? What would their sentence be? Others were almost mental wrecks. They knew nothing. They seemed to be uninterested in everything. Their minds were paralyzed. A strange crew indeed of human souls waiting their ratings in the new land. A matter of a few minutes in time only, and here were hundreds of bodies floating in the water. Dead. Hundreds of souls carried through the air alive. Very much alive somewhere. Many realizing their death had come were enraged at their own powerlessness to save their valuables. They fought to save what they had on earth prized so much. The scene on the boat at the time of striking was not pleasant, but it was as nothing to the scene among the poor souls newly thrust out of their bodies all unwillingly. It was both heartbreaking and repellent. And thus we waited. Waited until all were collected, until all was ready. And then we moved our scene to a different land. It was a curious journey that, far more strange than anything I had anticipated. We seemed to rise vertically into the air at terrific speed. As a whole we moved, as if we were on a very large platform and this was hurled into the air with gigantic strength and speed, yet there was no feeling of insecurity. We were quite steady. I cannot tell how long our journey lasted, nor how far from the earth we were when we arrived, but it was a gloriously beautiful arrival. It was like walking from your own English winter gloom into the radiance of an Indian sky. There all was brightness and beauty. We saw this land far off when we were approaching, and those of us who could understand realized that we were being taken to the place destined for all those people who pass over suddenly, on account of its general appeal. It helps the nerve-wracked newcomer to fall into line and regain mental balance very quickly. We arrived feeling, in a sense, proud of ourselves. It was all lightness, brightness, everything as physical and quite as material in every way as the world we had just finished with. Before I begin this story, a quick note of the chronology. I refer to everyone in this story as what they are to me now, step-dad and step-brother, even though at the time they were family friends. It makes it much easier to tell the story. My mom and my step-dad married just one year ago, but we have known him for many years since I was five. When we met him, he had just moved into our town with his now ex-wife and son and purchased an old home located in a remote part of town. It was one of the oldest homes in the area having been built in the 1700s by a sea captain and had been passed down through that family for the next 200 years. When my step-dad purchased it, it had been deserted for many years and was in poor condition. Yet with significant renovations it looked good as new. The house was L-shaped with the main part of the home being the original two-story construction and then a separate one-floor addition on the back of the house which contained the living room, kitchen and back office room and bathroom was added in the 1800s. The first time I visited the house, my step-dad took us on a tour. The newly remodeled living room and kitchen were beautiful with new wooden floors and a large fireplace. This part of the home had a distinctly warm ambience. That atmosphere instantly changed when we entered the oldest part of the home toward the front. I cannot explain what was different or why I felt anxious. I cannot point to anything tangibly distinct about that part of the house that justified that feeling. Still, a feeling of anxiousness originated deep inside of me and every hair on my body stood on end, especially in the upstairs hallway and near the staircase which was narrow, claustrophobic and with a very low ceiling and the whole front and upstairs of the house just felt dark. Even with many windows around it felt shrouded in darkness. The floors were a very dark wood and most of the walls were painted either blue or crimson. At the time I wrote it off as my nerves getting the better of me and having read too many ghost stories in my spare time. Still, there was something inexplicably creepy about parts of the house. Everywhere I went, I felt that there were entities I could not see staring me down with a menacing gaze. I was afraid to open any doors because of the innate feeling there would be something right behind them waiting to jump out at me. I felt exactly the same way turning corners into other rooms and I felt as if I was going to be grabbed from behind by something unseen. It was like I just knew there was something there and it was aware of and anticipating my presence. Everywhere I went in the front part of the house I felt I was being followed or chased. If I was in the front part of the house with another person and they left to go into the back of the house, the only area where there was any relief from this sensation, I would run as fast as I could after them. Being left alone in that part of the house felt like I was exposed and in danger. I visited the home probably once a week as a child as my stepdad was then a good family friend. My now stepbrother is the same age as me so we often played around the house and in the backyard. He never seemed to be afraid of the house and always wanted to venture off into parts of it that I was uncomfortable going into. I remember specifically one time we were playing hide and seek and he must have figured I would not feel comfortable searching upstairs. I searched the entire downstairs hoping to find him, hoping that I would not need to even go upstairs. Finally I heard a rustling sound from the closet located under the stairs. I opened the door and shouted, Found you! But to my shock and horror, there was no one there. The closet was almost empty with the exception of one or two jackets. I knew for a fact I had heard noise coming from there. To shake an adventure upstairs by myself I asked my stepdad to come upstairs with me and search for his son. As we were climbing the stairs I heard a noise from the upstairs hallway as if someone had bumped into the wall. I ran around the corner expecting to see my stepbrother but he was not there. All that was there was an old rocking chair which was slowly rocking back and forth on its own with the sound of someone humming to themselves. There was no window nor draft and no one sitting in the chair. I suddenly felt short of breath and felt as if there was someone right beside me breathing down my neck. I knew there was something there that I could not see. I remembered flailing my arms in all directions as if trying to swap whatever it was away, but there was no physical manifestation of this presence and that horrified me. I screamed and ran downstairs and bumped right into my stepbrother who came out from hiding under the sofa in the downstairs back room. As I clearly had not been able to find him he got sick of waiting and ended the game. This was the very last time I went upstairs by myself for many years. About a year later due to my antisocial tendencies as a child my mother insisted I sleep over at the house so I could learn to make better friends with my stepbrother. The thought of staying overnight in the house petrified me especially given that at the time my stepbrother's room was upstairs. The entire night leading up to bedtime there was no other worldly activity. They made me a nice dinner, we watched TV and music videos in the back of the house and I felt content and at peace. This feeling nice as it was was short I begged them to let me sleep on the sofa in the back living room even though it would have meant I would be alone in that part of the house but they insisted I sleep upstairs because all the bedrooms were upstairs and it would make it easier to check on us if we needed anything. Also there were two twin sized beds in the room so it made the most sense in terms of sleeping arrangements. I protested and protested but with no success. I begrudgingly accepted that I would have a night of terror. As I was being put to bed I remember seeing my stepdad's ex-wife shut the door to the upstairs bedroom right at the top of the stairs and turn out the light. Surprisingly I fell asleep quickly but did not stay asleep. I woke up in the middle of the night and immediately noticed the room was much darker than it should have been. Usually even at night once your eyes begin to adjust you can see what's around you and sense the light coming in from the moon outside. My eyes just could not adjust and the darkness was overwhelming. I immediately could sense that there was something in the room with me that I could not see and I could hear deep breathing sounds emanating from the darkness. I turned and looked over to my stepbrother's bed and he was not there which meant I was actually alone and he wasn't the one making the noises. I heard footsteps in the upstairs hallway and assumed that my stepbrother had gotten up to use the bathroom and would be right back but felt like an eternity passed and he did not return to the room. I hid my head under the covers trying to hide from whatever unseen entity was there but eventually I got so scared that I got out of bed and darted down the stairs at full speed in the dark trying to get away from whatever was there. I distinctly could tell I was being followed as I heard thump thump thump down the stairs behind me as if there was someone following closely behind me and breathing right down my neck. I ran through the downstairs hallway through the old dining room and was ready to cross into the back of the house and slam the door behind me and turn on all the lights when I ran right into the door. The door was never kept closed so I was not expecting it to be shut and I could barely see it was there. I immediately woke up my stepdad who turned on all the lights and ran to me in a panic checking to see if I was injured. I was hyperventilating and panicking shouting that there was someone in the house who was following me and chasing me. I could barely get the words out. He assumed I meant an intruder and checked every corner of the house top to bottom and found no one. Still seeing how panicked I was he allowed me to sleep on the downstairs sofa for the rest of the night. As I got older I became less afraid of the house but I still refused to be alone upstairs and the feeling of there being people or entities surrounding, following or watching me never subsided. Other times I heard sounds coming from other parts of the house even when no one was there. Music playing that had no source and it sounded like it was from a past era. Voices calling out my and other people's names. Footsteps and items being banged around and knocked off tables. I never investigated the sounds and whenever I'd point them out to another person they would stop. Everyone was convinced it was all in my head and I was the only person hearing the noises. They moved out of the house when I was about 12 and the owners that bought it next lived there until 2016. When the house was on the market in 2016 the realtor had an open house and anyone could come by and walk through it. I walked through the entire house. It had been remodeled and the walls were now all painted white and the windows had been replaced and were now much larger and more modern. Somehow these modifications made the home feel much less menacing. I could still sense a presence but it did not feel as menacing. I wandered away from the tour group and stood upstairs in the hallway, held out my arms and said aloud if there's anyone here, reveal yourselves to me. Nothing appeared and I didn't honestly expect it to but I felt a slight breeze whisked by my face down the hallway causing the curtain on one of the windows to rustle and it was gone as quickly as it came. In the moment I felt as if whatever presence was there had recognized me from childhood and was affirming to me finally that it was not going to harm me. It felt like closure. After a recent conversation with my stepbrother he admitted that he felt the same things I did when in the upstairs of the house but that he tried to pretend to be brave and never made his experiences known but that eventually the presence felt too strong and menacing that he moved his bedroom to the downstairs back office. My stepdad's ex-wife also moved her room downstairs both due to the feeling of a sinister presence upstairs and the dissolution of her marriage. My stepdad claims he had no experiences in the house but he said he felt a chilling feeling upstairs where hairs stood on end. He attributes it though to social conditioning and the expectation that a house of that age would have spirits. He's not a believer and refuses to reconsider his stance. It was incredibly validating to hear that I was not the only one experiencing this because for years everyone had pretended I was and no one believed me. Turns out that they experienced many of the same things I did but did not want to tell me at the time because they did not want to scare me. We still communicate with my stepdad's ex-wife. She's a good friend to this day. She confided some of her own experiences. One time she was downstairs late at night and heard the sound of someone or something tumbling down the stairs. She ran in a panic assuming my stepbrother had fallen but when she got to the stairs there was nothing there. She says this was by far the most unnerving experience she had in the house. Another time after she had moved her bedroom downstairs she heard footsteps coming into her room from the front hallway and the sound of a marble rolling across the floor. The sounds were right in front of her but she could not see anything there. In the morning she had searched for anything that could have made the rolling sound on the floor but there was nothing. No marble, pen, pencil or coin. These experiences stay with her even to this day. There is a legend that about 150 years ago a woman was murdered by her husband on the staircase who came from around the corner and pushed her down the stairs in the middle of a heated argument. The story has neither been confirmed nor denied. If you made it this far welcome to the Weirdo Family. If you like the podcast please tell your friends and family about it however you can and get them to become weirdos too. Do you have a dark tale to tell of your own? Fact or fiction, click on Tell Your Story at WeirdDarkness.com and I might use it in a future episode. All stories in Weird Darkness are purported to be true unless stated otherwise and you can find source links or links to the authors in the show notes. Killer Kids was written by Abby White and predicting a killer was written by CWS both from the lineup. The Horse Who Could Do Math was by Kaushik Padawari for Amusing Planet. Words from Beyond The Grave is by Mark Hartzman for Weird Historian. And 1750s Horror Home is by Virulent Peach for Your Ghost Stories. Weird Darkness Theme by Alibi Music. And now that we are coming out of the dark I'll leave you with a little light. First John 2 verse 17, The world and its desires pass away, but the man who does the will of God lives forever. And a final thought, life does not have to be perfect to be wonderful. A net funneccello. I'm Darren Marlar. Thanks for joining me in the Weird Darkness.


Russia's poorly trained troops can't dislodge Ukraine from key foothold. Russia's troops have been unable to push Ukraine from territory under Kiev's control on the east bank of the Nipro River, according to a new assessment. This is despite Moscow's significant advantage on the left bank of the river, which is also known as the Nipro in the south of Ukraine. Russia's Nipro group of forces have been unsuccessful in all its attempts to dislodge the Ukrainian defenders from the east bank, despite almost certainly having a significant advantage in the balance of forces in the area, the UK Defence Ministry said. It is highly likely that the poor training and coordination of Russian forces in the area is limiting their offensive capabilities, the British government said. Ukraine made sweeping gains in the Southern Kursan region in its first counter-offensive in late 2022, pushing Russian forces back to the east bank of the Nipro that has roughly marked the front lines in the region throughout 2023 and into 2024. Kiev's fighters have been whittling away at Russian defences on the east bank, establishing pockets of control in villages such as Kvinki, according to Newsweek. Around April 2023, Russia's government made one of its first references to a Nipro group of forces operating in southern Ukraine. The group was likely formed after heavy losses to Moscow's original forces around Kursan, London said last spring. But Ukrainian forces maintained their positions on the left bank of the Nipro and there were no confirmed changes to the front lines.


Thanks for checking out this movie review video. So this is for the 1993 film Jurassic Park Yes, that massive blockbuster that I'm sure people have seen so many times people talk about it so much It's very well known. It's wormed its way into pop culture and has been there for a long time because it was unbelievably successful now because So many people know this film so well and even people who haven't necessarily seen it know about it because it's so Highly thought of and talked about I'm not gonna do kind of a normal-ish review I mean to a degree I will but I'll talk about some things that I think are particularly interesting about the film things I think are important definitely get into the themes and the subtext of it because That's mainly what I want to get out of all my reviews and just talk about some things I thought were interesting that I found in my research that I didn't know about the film Obviously, there's plenty of stuff that pretty much everyone knows But hopefully you get something extra out of the film here. So getting into it. Oh, and when I watched this it was on Netflix Streaming service so you can check it out if it's still there Directed by Steven Spielberg. I don't need to go over what Steven Spielberg has done. Everybody knows Steven Spielberg Well, what I do want to say is Jurassic Park came out after he finished doing the film hook and The same year as he put out Schindler's list. So Yeah, obviously Steven Spielberg unbelievably prolific as a director also has done writing at the same time and This film, I mean you just see the directing you see the amazing directing obviously the cinematography is amazing I'll talk a little bit more about some of the other technical things with the film But this is one of those films that you look at and all the technical stuff just comes together in one of the most beautiful Ways and that's why this is one of the biggest blockbuster films ever because especially if you watch it now And you think this came back. This came out back in 1993 like it looks good now Imagine if you saw it in 1993 in the theater Mind-blowing the way it looks really So anyway, this was written by Michael Crichton one of my favorite authors from being a kid My parents were very controlling about what I couldn't couldn't watch when I was young So I wasn't able to watch horror films But they really wanted to encourage me to read no matter what it was So I read a bunch of Michael Crichton books including Jurassic Park and the follow-up book lost world And when I was looking into it, I was actually surprised to find out. I mean, I knew that a lot of Films had come out being based off Michael Crichton books But I didn't know that Michael Crichton was involved in writing screenplays for any of those films or other films for that matter But I found that out so Crichton actually was involved in the screenplay for Jurassic Park He was paid one point five million dollars to option the book for the film But then he was given an extra five hundred thousand dollars to actually pin the screenplay for the film now that said The the screenplay was then given a second pass and changed somewhat by a David Cope or cop so Backpedaling a little bit Michael Crichton some other films that he's written scripts for which I thought was interesting the 1973 film Westworld which you know now there's the Westworld TV show on HBO The Great Train Robbery and Twister those were just a few that I thought were quite interesting David Cope has done a lot of good Screenplay stuff toy soldiers death becomes her Carlitos way the original mission impossible stir of echoes Panic room spider-man and the new film you should have left with Kevin Bacon So I haven't seen that film yet. I do want to see it the trailer looks interesting So this guy's still really working still probably making a lot of money just saying So this film was crazy profitable It was six sixty three million dollar budget, and it made one point zero three three billion dollars it made over a billion dollars that is unbelievable This is a crazy cash cow now that makes you understand why there were sequels to the film and then also why it's been resurrected again with the two newer films that were done Which I saw the the first of them and I was like Whatever Before the novel was actually published there were four studios with directors attached who were in a bidding war for the film Yes, before the book was published that was one of the crazy things I found out now Some of the other potential directors if they had one in the bidding war we're gonna potentially be Richard Donner Tim Burton and Joe Dante Joe Dante gremlins Just think about those directors think about Jurassic Park and think about how different The film could have been with any one of those directors because it's a whole vision, you know Yes, I'm sure they probably still would have had you know, they still had the same source material They probably still would have used Michael Crichton for screenplay, but the directing would have been different a lot of things Would have been different so it's fun to know these things and then kind of have that mental exercise of what could it have been like Like I would love to see now like a Joe Dante version of Jurassic Park Because I feel like it would probably be more on the horror Side of things and I would really like that because they do pull back a lot with this film So Stan Winston's company did the animatronics which were amazing at the time I mean really kind of the star of the film They did CGI with it which actually held up pretty well But the best parts what looks the best are when you're they're using those giant animatronics Because they're able to put the actors right next to them and it looks real unlike CGI Looks a little bit wonky a lot of times especially after after it's been more than 10 years So yeah, so Stan Winston's company has done the practical effects Also for the first Iron Man film for Terminator 2 for Predator and Predator 2 and the monster squad Aliens, so there's a lot of good resume building right there and Actually when they were constructing the animatronic dinosaurs for this they actually had a paleontologist who was supervising it to make sure that they Looked correct and they had the correct like bone structure to look like the actual dinosaurs Which I thought was really cool. I mean that's amazing attention to detail. It means they really wanted them to look correct John Williams did the score for this and John Williams is IMDB credits. You should just look at Insane an insane amount of credits for for music He's done for films But just a few big ones to throw out there that people will know Star Wars and Jaws, I mean that's pretty much all you need to know, but there's an insane amount on there Just take a look at it Spielberg actually cites the film Godzilla king of the monsters as his inspiration for how he did this film Which I think is totally cool because Godzilla is really cool And I just found it very interesting that a Godzilla film was an inspiration for that and he said that it was kind of like a lot of it Like was the level of destruction and how kind of hopeless people felt when Godzilla and all the monsters were just destroying the city So showing how careful the operation is in the beginning of this film I think is when they're moving in the dinosaurs in and then something goes a little bit wrong is a really important moment because it shows you how many levels they're going to to kind of ensure that things are fine and safe and everything like that and even though They do that things go wrong and that's heavy for shadowing that obviously things are gonna go wrong later And that's you know based off the trailer before the film even came out People knew that's what was gonna happen You know things were gonna have to really go wrong on an epic scale now that said There's so much heavy for shadowing in this film a crazy amount there I cannot I can't even count how many times there's foreshadowing More vague and more like blunt and beating you on the head leading up to things really going wrong in the film and For that reason I kind of don't like that aspect about it now because it just feel like feels like it's this constant like Winking at you and not like a quick wink like that so wink like Like If someone did that to you in person doing one of those real quick or doing a It you know what I mean like it's exaggerated. You're just like okay. I get it I get it So I wish that a lot of that had been kind of pulled back Just beat you over the head and I don't like that type of stuff But it was important for them in the beginning to show that things can go wrong Another thing that I thought was kind of interesting is more of like a subtle things will go wrong was when Grant Ends up touching the television at his paleontologist site in the beginning or Archaeological site in the beginning and he it messes up and then Sadler basically says oh, he's not good with technology and That kind of like that foreshadows for you that he's He is a person who's not good with technology and when he touches it it goes wrong is going into this high Technology amusement park that basically needs that technology to have things not go wrong It just lets you know that he's kind of like the curse coming to The amusement park that will just set everything off So I thought that was kind of a funny foreshadowing and cool I'm with Grant on the thought about not really liking kids And one of the things that kind of I think is dumb about this film Is that they use the fact that these kids are in peril to? Indeer to Grant that he should have kids because I guess like through the whole harrowing experience of him You know having to save these children He then feels closer to the kids and it's like oh I could have kids of my own But I think for me it would personally like be the opposite where I just be like these kids did really stupid things and got themselves into really awful situations and They shouldn't have been here in the first place So I definitely don't want to have kids but that said the kids are useful at times And that's why they kind of work that in although I will say one of my biggest arguments is the fact that Lex the girl is a hacker a computer hacker. How old is she? She's like 14 or 15 or something like that That's not even close to being believable It's stupidity and the other thing is that she sits down and like fixes everything Sista computer systems wise in the in the park And it was my it was my understanding that this park was like custom built computer technology and Dennis Nedry the one of the evil guys in the in the movie Had basically even said so earlier in the film So for this like 14 15 year old girl to like sit down at a computer and be like oh, I'm a hacker I know how to take care of this do do do do and we're good Unbelievably ridiculous really stupid does not play well And it's a huge eye roll for me whenever I see this film and I hate it and that never should have been in the film I don't even remember if it's in the book because since I read the book I just remember the book was better, but I Don't remember differences so much So Hammons disdain for lawyers in this signals kind of like a headstrong manager Man this sorry a headstrong manner of how he basically will just forge ahead no matter what's going on Like I said, there's so many Indicators that are even seen by Hammond that something can go wrong or will go wrong And he just chooses to ignore it because he's so focused on Making this reality. He's already put in so much effort and so much money and everything that like no matter what hell or Highwater he's gonna make this happen and only the gigantic catastrophe of what happens in the film It is what you know in encourages him to be like, okay I have to give up on it because it's just not even salvageable at this point But he's so headstrong and it goes into what kind of Malcolm says about You know you did all this because you could and you didn't stop to think should you and I think that's kind of one of the biggest like underlying themes in the film of you know Should human beings because they have the ability through science to do certain things like clone dinosaurs Should they do that not do it? Should we just do it because we can do it and see what happens? It's more of a if we can do something we should then step back from it consider Is this a good idea or not do a real cost? Cost-benefit analysis and then come to a conclusion of yes This is actually safe or and or good for the future and society and everything or no This is this is too much of a problem. So but Hammond is just so headstrong in this and And his disdain for the lawyer in particular kind of shows that because the lawyer is there to kind of put the checks and balances Into place and do the cost-benefit analysis literally and Hammond's just like whatever and then obviously the lawyer gets eaten so The Hokie education video I actually think is very over-the-top, but at the same time it feels pretty real for what I think an amusement park does I've seen kind of Videos Hokie videos like that at kind of theme parks and stuff like that before so it feels pretty real Early on I I question the the choice Once again about using frog DNA to blend with the dinosaur DNA And I say it's a it's a really weird thing that stands out to me initially in the film because I was like Why would you mix amphibian DNA with reptile DNA? I would think that it would be blended and filled in with like a guana or something like that like reptile to reptile not Amphibian into reptile so from a scientific standpoint It doesn't make sense to me, but then again, I'm also not you know a scientist. So, you know, that's just my opinion Malcolm's quote about life not being able to be contained is Very strong for shadowing, but that's one of the good for shadow wings because it really makes you start to think because it makes You think past the film itself. It's not just about the film It's kind of you know life will always find a way to move on and that's in in the face of You know just saying well, we'll just clone these dinosaurs that are females therefore They won't procreate. Well, no you have to know there's evolution and adaptation and everything like that So it'll move on but then it also plays with the aspect of you know Life will move on with the people because the people will find a way out and even if there's a big disaster You know on a civilization scale civilization will still move forward to some point So I like that comments about the raptor intellect is yet another one of those kind of red flags The the red flags that Hammond sees very clearly, but then it's just like oh, you know That's fine because they they stress so much that like oh these raptors are unbelievably smart They can figure all this stuff out yet They don't think ahead to think man they could really figure this out and this could be a real problem and to that I think the best parts of the film in my Opinion other than the initial reveal the t-rex and when the t-rex gets out and is messing with the rovers Anything having to do with the raptors any scene with the raptors are like the best parts of the film in my opinion because they're so Interesting they're so agile and small and it feels like they're much harder to get away from than something like a t-rex because you can kind of hide from the t-rex especially because if you just don't move but the raptors they're a whole different breed and they're so lethal and They're sinister because the other thing is like you see them and it's like they have a sneer on their face, which I like And then the scientists just can't follow the rules That's another thing you know when they're there doing their kind of run-through of the amusement park It's like they just don't follow the rules they keep getting out of the rides and just moving ahead. So I saw that was funny The man in nature end up coming together to create the perfect storm for everything that ends up going wrong Perfect storm, you know man in the sense of Dennis Being greedy and trying to steal these embryos and take them to a competitor And then also that storm actual nature storm coming in and really messing with things at the same time those things converge To make that catastrophic issue, which I thought was very interesting It's not just one just one either just nature or just Human element could have made everything go wrong, but it was I thought it was interesting that the combination of the two made it all go wrong Obviously the t-rex reveal is awesome. It's really really good I like how Grant and Malcolm just end up watching the t-rex try and eat the kids for quite some time Before they actually get involved and feel like we should try and save these kids And I think a lot of people don't think about that, but we if you rewatch the film just Focus on how long it takes Malcolm and Grant to actually try and do something to save those kids It's after the rover has already been flipped on its top and they may very well be dead at that point We know that they're not but they don't at that point I like the shot showing all the merch in the store and then going and showing Hammon kind of very sadly eating a bunch of ice cream Because I thought well, I guess all that stuff's not getting sold I saw that was kind of funny It kind of shows the hopes and dreams and planning and then the contrast of where it actually is So I think it's a cool shot for that reason The first raptor appearance is one of the best scenes, you know When saddler gets the power turned back on and then the It's a good jump scare the the raptor head comes like flying through some of the electrical cords And she's like, oh my gosh, that's a great moment It's the best jump scare in my opinion and it's um, yeah, it's cool And that's when it marks like here are the raptors That's first time you see the raptors and then you get all the raptor awesome awesomeness At the end Grant is looking at the flying pelicans when they're leaving In the helicopter and you can see him just thinking basically I like them better as birds Because there's a lot of emphasis on him saying that he believes dinosaurs They didn't just like become extinct that they kind of devolve, you know evolved into basically birds And so it's a cool kind of bringing it all together in the end where you know, they're flying away from from the island And there are these pelicans flying and he's looking and just being like Yeah, I definitely prefer this version of where the dinosaurs have gone versus the old version That's very dangerous to try to kill me. So I thought that was cool So this is ultimately about man thinking they can control nature now This isn't an old concept This something gets played with a lot in horror films and just in film in general And it is a problem in society where we think we can always control nature And that's how we end up getting into all these terrible situations where you know, we build Housing in flood planes and then there's a flood and then we're like, oh my god, it's a catastrophe But we knew that would happen But we felt that somehow we could overcome nature, you know things like that or the fact that we never really think about You know tornadoes being that big of an issue or hurricanes or anything like that Until they're happening and then we can't do anything about it really You know, there's a lot of planning and things that can be done ahead of time to try and mitigate some loss loss of life and physical things but Ultimately we're at nature's mercy when these big things happen And this film kind of is one of those things that shows that, you know, you want to bring back Some really old species that nature got rid of it wasn't in nature's plan So guess what things are going to go wrong and nature's going to overcome Humanity because you thought you could control it, but you cannot control it So I like that about it. It's also about the morality and danger of bringing the old species back and making the statement That nature should be left to take care of itself and this kind of gets back to the whole, you know, should we do it? or anything like that so, yeah This came out during a time when a lot of discussion was starting about human Impact on the earth. So this kind of plays into a lot of those anxieties right now Or back then it plays to the some of those same anxieties That's when things were really getting going about talking about like global warming And just like the terrible impact that humans can have on the earth And the interesting thing to me is that a lot of people Kind of frame talking about that in a weird way. They talk about it as well. Let's protect the earth Let's keep the health of the earth and stuff like that. It's not really about that because in some way the earth will continue It's just will it continue with us like will it maintain its survivability for us and and I think that's how I personally look at it is I want to maintain the earth in the best way that is Comfortable for the human species so that we can stick around as long as possible Instead of, you know, oh just protect the earth because we need to just take care of the earth for the earth No, we need to take care of the earth for for us Uh, literally because otherwise It's not it's not in it becomes inhabitable for humans. There's still a lot of other species that will Stay and the earth will be there until the sun swallows it But I don't know when that is Uh, just saying uh, you can also see the great evil of money in this film Money makes the park happen and money makes dentists shut down the computer systems Which leads to all the problems and it's not just money being evil, but it's more of money driving ill-informed decisions money driving people to Look past the dangers look past the potential issues look past the impending issues that are coming and just see those dollar signs Put their head down and keep going money is a very strong motivator and if you think about it, it's not even real It's a societal concept that if everybody woke up tomorrow and said we don't believe in money anymore It wouldn't have any impact anymore. It would have no power and it wouldn't exist And that's a really interesting thing But that's just my little, you know, rant about the concept of money and everything Obviously, I buy by it because you can't really get out of it at this point, but whatever Anyway, that's a whole another thing But hopefully you enjoyed this review on Jurassic Park Definitely interested in hearing what people have to say about it Put it down in the comments and uh, do me a quick favor though Hit that subscribe button because I really appreciate it Uh, whenever anyone subscribes to the channel, uh, and if you are going to hit that button Or you already have hit the notification bell as well That way you know anytime i'm putting up any reviews or putting or doing live streams or whatever But real quick, I I almost forgot I got to do the star rating for this So out of five stars with half stars in play In hindsight, this is a four star film I was between four and four and a half but some of the plot holes in it and the crazy, uh, Bashing overhead for shadowing I'm gonna take it down to a four star, but no, I was kind of between four and four and a half It is fun and I had a good time revisiting it But anyway, thanks for checking this out and until next time keep it brutal