Welcome to another very special episode of our series Beating All Odds. In this series, we are honoring leaders who despite so many challenges thrown at us by COVID-19 are standing tall. The leader I have today is indeed a special one. He is a media maven, a creative thinker, a trendsetter and the most cheerful leader media and entertainment industry has ever had. A 10 minute conversation with him and the life suddenly looks very good. So in these times of despair and anxiety, he is someone you must listen to. Please welcome Mr Raj Nayak, founder and managing director of House of Chairs. Welcome to the show Mr Nayak. Yes, I can hear you and thank you so much Nazia. That was a too fabulous introduction. I mean, you made me cheerful just by the introduction. I'm feeling on top of the world. But you are very kind and really nice of you. Thank you. So, you know, these are actually very difficult times for the industry. You know it better than me. The business has come to a halt. How will this crisis change broader dynamics of our entertainment industry? I think there is going to be a change. If we think that the future is going to be the same, I don't think so. At least not the near future. The long-term future, I don't know. And so I don't profess to know something that I don't know. But the long-term, it will leave a psychological impact on everybody's mind, you know, in some way or the other. And if you're speaking about our industry in particular, the advertising and marketing industry, if you're speaking about the entertainment industry, you've seen today a new movie is going directly on Amazon. I forget the name of the movie, Gulab something, you know. And I think the dynamics of the business is going to change. I was reading today's, I think either you posted it or some other publication posted it saying that broadcasters are already asking production houses to cut costs. I saw an interview with Uday Shankar where he mentioned that, you know, I just need to find people who have access to mobile phones. So I think the whole thing is going to change because advertisers have suddenly realized one of the things is, you can make the same thing so cheaply and it works. So why should I go to Switzerland and shoot? Why should I do this? Why should I do that? That is why. Cash is a big problem today. And because of which I think immediately people will be a little averse to opening their purse strings. They'll be a little tight-fisted, I would say. Having said that, the entertainment industry content consumption is going to go up, it's gone up tremendously. But at the same time the economics of it, the dynamics of it in terms of monetization is a challenge. So I know some broadcasters who mentioned to some production houses who have been in touch with me saying that we are not going to commission too much. So it's a chicken and egg situation. I'm very optimistic. I'm a very eternal optimist, my heart. So I would like to believe that things will come back to some kind of a normal, but it'll take time. It ain't going to be nahari. I think smaller production houses will gain from the situation because they are... Somebody who has, one of the things this COVID has done, it's even made people like me who's a tech dinosaur, tech savvy. I mean, in the sense I'm learning something every day. You know, this show that I put up, I mean the live chat, I wouldn't call it a show, a live chat that I started is something that I did it all on my own. I mean, I'm a guy who didn't know how to actually even put together a presentation on a computer. And I know grandparents and parents and everybody are now getting on their mobile phone, doing FaceTime, doing Zoom calls, playing Ludo King with one another and all kinds of things. So I think people who are digitally savvy, people who are able to produce stuff at an economical cost, great quality, I think they have a huge future, huge, huge future. And one of the things I was thinking in my mind is I don't have the skill set, but how can I leverage? A lot of people having the skill sets with the skill set that I have with my relationship with all the brand managers or marketing directors and companies. I've just been thinking in my head because everybody needs a bridge. You know, and there are lots of people, I was speaking to one of the marketing head of a broadcasting company yesterday and she told me, she said, somebody reached out to her and said, I made this film. Would you like to look at it? And she bought it for 50,000 rupees. And they commissioned the film to an agency for 4.5 lakh rupees.  We just put our logo on it, we branded it and we put it out for 50,000 rupees. I think that kind of opportunity for people who are really talented. And talented individuals. You know, sitting at home, they can turn out stuff and if they have the right bridge to be able to find the right buyer, I think there's a huge opportunity. In fact, I wanted to understand from you because you have also recently ventured into a new company which also was supposed to get into production, right? So what kind of content will you look into now? I started with something when I quit my job. I quit my job without anything in hand. I didn't think what I'm going to do. But that's me, that's my nature. I'm impulsive. Even my business or people who know me will tell you, Raj makes decisions like this. So I quit my jobs also many times, still like this, which is a good thing and a bad thing. But some of it works for me. So I'm blessed that way. So when I quit, I started House of Cheer with a specific intent of doing something in the business of happiness and I actually built something. It is still built, so it's not going to go waste. Only thing is I need to probably redesign it and probably the timing for me may not be the right time to launch. I was planning to launch it on my mother's birthday on 22nd of March, but then everything has gone for a sixer now. In content, I had strategically taken a decision that I will go into content slowly because I didn't want to get into it. I didn't want to be a production house because that's not my skill set. I don't have that skill set at all. But I wanted to be a curator of good content and I wanted to create a studio model where I would outsource the line production and take some good projects to some big OTT platforms. That was the thought, but I had put it on hold because I was focusing on something else. And content business, you know, it's a... Complete, complete.  I said content business, there's a lot of gestation period. Yeah, so content business, there's a lot of gestation period. It just doesn't happen all night. And so I was very clear that I wanted to have some business which gave me a stable cash flow on a regular basis. Then I would focus on content and that would be an idea. I was not interested in doing too many things, doing one show at a time or things like that. Coming back to the happiness product which you were supposed to launch last month. I mean, I feel you were pretty ahead of time because this year, there's so much anxiety. These are such gloomy times that everyone would need some kind of happiness product. Do you agree with me? I totally agree with you. My only challenge is going to be lots of companies who will want my product may not want to spend that money. So again, I'll have to find a way of finding the balance between... And also need to redesign the product a little bit. And I'm working on it. So the way I look at it is in every adversity, there's an opportunity. I'm a firm believer that every cloud has a silver lining. I come from that school of thought. So I'm looking at it. So I'm not saying that things won't happen. Maybe I may just launch anything two months from now or I may wait for another six months to launch. We are not in any big hurry. I'm here to stay. Also, in these difficult times, how are you keeping yourself motivated and how are you keeping your team motivated? I don't have a very large team. So that's a good thing. You do have a team. Yeah, I do have a team. And I have a very large team outside of who are not working with me. All my colleagues or my people, I work in different organizations. So they keep me entertained. They keep giving me stuff, what's happening and what's not happening and things like that. I think they also call me to prep themselves up. So it's mutual. They prep me up and they prep themselves up. So I'm getting a lot of feedback. I'm connected with a lot of people I was not connected with for many years. I destroyed some people whom I have not been in touch for many years. But other than that, I've been busy. I've been busy doing. In fact, it's funny that I'm more busy now doing nothing. What have I been busy about? But time has just flown by. Because there's no demarcation between your home and office. You left home around 9 o'clock or 9.15 in the morning. You reached office by 9.30, 9.45 because my office is close by. But now that it's not there. So there's no demarcation between person and professional. It's 24 hours. And it can consume you. I'm sure you are more tired. I can with conviction tell you, even though I don't know much about you, you are working even harder than what you used to work. Okay, going to office. But that's a reality for everybody. That's a reality for everybody. Yeah, that's a reality. But I've been doing a little bit of reading. I've been doing a bit of watching. And now that I've done my light chat, I'm doing a little bit of research on my guest. And I've been doing exercising, which I know. I mean, I was not prompt with it, but I've been extremely prompt now because and I spend a lot of time with my little doggy, Meredith. You can see her. I hope I can show you. Let me take this to her. Can you see her? Not yet. Yes. Can you see her? Yeah. Can you see her? Yeah, she's sleeping. Yeah. Yeah, she's sleeping on my bed. Nicely sleeping. So that was Meredith for you. So she keeps me entertained. She follows me all around the house. So she keeps me entertained. And that's it. I mean, I play Ludo with my sisters in Bangalore. Sorry. Yes, I play Ludo with my sisters in Bangalore. And so we do all these things. And of course there's a lot of cooking, eating, eating, cooking. I think we've cooked more different dishes in the house during COVID than any other time because half the time you're cooking with stuff that is available to you. So you can't eat what it's not available. So experimenting. So it's been good. And I cooked also. And it's not some, I don't think it's a great batch of dinner that I cooked. But I did that as well. What did you cook? My wife and daughter find it funny. I cooked Thai curry rice. Fried rice and Thai curry. I'm sure it must have been made yesterday. At least that's what your wife and daughter would have told you. No, they actually, they did tell me it was good. So, and let me tell you they are my, they are the biggest honest critic. Honest critic or everything I do. They actually inflate my balloon.  That is what family is for. I also wanted to talk to you about your new show because you know, it's already created a buzz and the kind of people you are speaking to are very interesting. Tell us a little more about it. Where did the idea come from? I was sitting like this and I should actually give credit to my dear friend Anurag Bhatra. I'm sure. So he called me one day and he said, I want to do it. I want to do Anurag Bhatra and his colleague. I'm just forgetting now. Abhinav. This is age catching up with me that I'm forgetting names. Call me up and said, Pardon? Actually Abhinav called me and said first. Yeah, Abhinav called me and he said, we want to do a call with you. We want to do a Zoom call with you and an interview with you and then Anurag will be joining as well. So I said, okay. So we did that call and then I watched the call and I felt good with myself. I felt good with myself and then I said, why don't I do something? Why don't I do something? And I said maybe first I thought that the business world will carry it on its platform or something like that. Anurag hasn't made me that often. So then I said, okay. I mentioned this to a colleague of mine called Mandy Kulkarni. And I said, I'm thinking of something like that. So what Mandy did was he actually made a poster and sent me. I looked at my own picture and I felt very happy about it and I looked at the poster and I liked the poster. So I said, okay, let me go ahead and do it. And then I spoke to a friend of mine, Jill Mejewski. And I told her this is what I want to do. She said, why don't you do it? If you want to do it, do it. You know, if that's what your heart is telling you, want to do it, do it. And this is a good time to do it. So I said, okay. So I said, will you be my first guest? Now she was put on a spot because she's never given an interview. She's never done a show ever in her life. And so she, I mean, she was encouraging me, telling me do what your heart tells you to do. And then I asked her, will you be my first guest? She couldn't say no. So that's how it started. And actually between the time I decided it was on a Saturday by Sunday evening, I had a poster to Monday. I made the announcement Friday. I was live. But once I went live, I decided, okay, who should I get as my next guest?  So that happened. So the, so then when, then I said, I should have a guest line up for at least two weeks. Not a couple of weeks. I don't want to make it a couple of weeks because what happens is if something topical comes up and if I may want to change, right? So, so every two, I have two weeks lined up. So I've got my next guest. Same thing. I called a punam. I called a punam because again, I wanted people from different walks of life. I did not want only Bollywood or only politics or things. So my next guest is punam. So again, I called a sent a message and she said, sure, tell me when I said, this is the day. This is the time. She said, anytime for you, Raj. And that's it. So, and now I'm fixing my next guest. Interesting. I mean, as it, you will get to know every Monday. And that's what I've decided in my head. The thought process was Friday will be the show. No matter how much people love you, they will not be able to watch it live, but they've got the weekend to catch up. And Mondays I will announce my new guest. So there's something to look forward to. So Raj, before we close it, I also wanted to, I would want you to go back to like one year back when you were the CEO of, CEO of ICON. What would have been the first few things you would have done after this lockdown, you know, when you would have gone back to office? What do you think anybody who's in that position right now? Yeah, I mean, what are the, what are first of the first few measures that anybody who's in that position, be it Y Com, be it star, be it any other big broadcasters should do? I think first of, I'm sure most of them are doing that. But first and foremost, I think communication, clear clarity in communication, you know, you have half the things as people assume things. And in today's day and age, and one of the things, because I'm working with a partner in London, and they're doing a lot of work at the corporate there. And he was telling me from some of the keywords and coming things that are coming out, anxiety, his fear is, you know, not knowing what's going on. People are scared and things like that, right? Also a lot of fatigue because people are overworking.  But now there's no, everybody is calling everybody at all the time. So those kind of things. I think clarity in communication. I think first thing any leader should do at this stage is as many times as possible. And clarity in communication and constant feedback because you don't know who is going through what, who lives in what circumstances, what are their personal problems. These are the times when I think being empathetic for a leader is the most important thing. You know, you can't assume because you got living in a 5 bedroom apartment and you got a condition and you can't assume the person at the other end is the same for all that person of yours who's a very excellent employee in office. In today's situation, maybe having a small baby at home, he has to manage his wife, he has to manage the baby, they don't have health, they have to work together. So you have to take into consideration these things. You have to assume that everybody is going through hardships and then work towards it. I think first is being empathetic, second is clarity in communication, getting feedback, feedback is a very important thing and also creating people, sort of people in groups where you have leaders who are there to take care of each other's problems, to find out what are the employees facing, is somebody having a problem, does somebody need help and I think corporate at this time, if you're not there for your people when they need you, see some of the things are going to happen, whether you like it or not, cost-cutting is going to happen, things like that. But that is reality as long as you're being fair and you're, it's fine, it's fine. But I think compassion and empathy is the most important thing for a leader at this stage. This is more on a personal front. What I was trying, also trying to understand is from business perspective, what are some of the key measures that leaders should do in the ME industry right now? I think this is a big learning for corporates. I know somebody told me yesterday and this is damn funny, COVID can be renamed as CTO, because what CTOs have managed to do for organizations, this pandemic has made corporates good digital and good digital and how. I think one of the things corporates will also do and I was, like I said, I was speaking to a colleague of mine in London and he told me Raj, none of my people, and they don't have a very big set up, they have a set up of about say 40 or 60 people, he said none of my colleagues after this want to come back to work, they don't want to come back to work, they say we want to work from home, if the work is getting done, why should we come to work? Now, I think that is going to change. I think one of the things, and I heard Uday also saying that, you know, in one of his, I watched it on some channel, I don't know, but he was saying that. So I think that one of the things that when a person goes back is to see what is important and also prepare for a situation like this for the future. So whether digitally, whether if you can get things done where people don't have to travel, I think as a leader you also have as an organization and as a leader, you have a responsibility towards society. So if you can make sure that your people don't have to travel and if you can get the work done, why have cars on the road and people traveling by trains and things like that, give them the option to work from home. You have done it now and your work is going on smoothly, I assume. So people who have to come to work, you can't help it, but the editing job can be done from anywhere, for example. I'm just giving in my industry. So I think even if you cut 30%, 40%, that will be enough, I mean of workforce coming to office. You can do something. You can say come three days a week and do it in rotation so that you know, so half the population doesn't come. It's so good for the environment of the environment and so many other things. Yes. So I would think that way. I would actually think of policy based on whatever they're doing. They still continue to work that many days a week, but tell them you have to come to office twice a week. You know that kind of thing and rotation so that everybody doesn't come on the same two days of the week. So things like that, I think people, leaders have to be more innovative. They have to think differently. One of the things that's not happening today is there are no water cooler conversations in offices. So people are feeling lonely. So can you do some kind of a thing where people come together on a weekly basis digitally because there's no other option digitally. So things like that. I think leaders have to be innovative. Leaders have to think differently. And I once again say the same thing. Leaders have to communicate. Leaders have to get feedback. And leaders have to be empathetic. I think your internet connection is a little slow.  It gets hanged after a few minutes. Oh, I'm so sorry. This is scary for me, especially because if I'm going to do live tomorrow, then it's scary. That is the challenge. Because we are dependent on somebody for the internet connection. So before we close, Raja, I want you to say a couple of things about for those people who perhaps started their own businesses much like you, but they're not as confident or as experienced or they do not have that experience of taking risk like you have. They're younger than you. They've done it for the first time or they've invested too much money. What kind of, I mean, how do you motivate them and what should they do in this situation? Hello. I would say it is very scary. I would be lying if I said it's not scary. It's scary even for me, okay? In spite of having a roof over my head and food on the table, it is scary for me. So I can imagine somebody who's put their life savings and started something or taken debt or borrowed money or things like that. It's very, very scary. But I would say be optimistic because you don't have a choice. You don't have a choice.  So be optimistic. You have to be hopeful, but you have to be also very businesslike.  If you feel, don't say, I will, if you, if you can always get out of this, something that you're not able to sustain, shut it down.  Wherever you can work from home, do things like that. Cash is king. So whatever you can conserve, conserve, and it is better to cut your losses and still be focused in what you're doing. You know, you never give up hope.  People don't fail. People have setbacks. So you need to be able to say, okay, it's a setback. I will take a step back and then I will move forward at the right time.  You have to just, you know, sidestep and let the tsunami pass, and then you go, you know. So that's the way to look at it. But be hopeful. You know, the one thing that, that keeps us going is hope. Poori kaina, what does it say? Umid me. I don't know. I'm very bad with these things, but, uh, uh, so, so that's it. So, so you have to have hope. You have to be positive. Uh, and, uh, say, say, say to yourself, this too shall pass, you know, say that to yourself and it will pass. Believe me, it will pass. I'm very confident. We will bounce back and we, when we bounce back, we will bounce back much, much, much higher. Yes. Inshallah, we all will bounce back. And, uh, on that optimistic note, I have to close this because we are already out of time. And, uh, thank you so much, Raj for speaking to us. This is very inspiring. And I'm sure it'll inspire those who really need inspiration who are feeling very anxious in this moment.  Thank you so much. And stay at home. Stay safe. Take care of your health. Thanks a lot for your time. You too. Take care. And thank you for having me on this. And one of the days you're going to, and one of these days you're going to come on my Friday's live. Oh, give me some more years. Let me be, let me reach that level that I come to come on that show. No, no, but what I want to tell my, uh, uh, my friends in the industry on the show is this show will also cover people from the industry. Just for your information. Because that's where my bread and butter came from for many, many years. So they can, and they are, and there are many, many people in the studio inspired me. So they'll be my first time. Thank you, Raj. Raj, you really need to fix your internet connection. It's hanging, uh, it's hanging every few minutes. It becomes a little slow. So, But did you get, did you get what I said just now? Did you get what I said just now?  And a lot of people have inspired me and I want to, in some way or the other, get them on my Friday life with Raj. Thank you so much. You've already made my day. You don't know. I'm physically sitting there, but I'm on some another level right now. Thank you, Raj. Thanks a lot. And it was, it was our pleasure speaking to you. Thank you. Thank you very much.


I thought this would be very, very sketchy, because this is a subject that is growing and with contributions, important contributions by United peoples. First, it was the idea of a higher purpose, and it was about Charles. Charles, right? He is an homotopy theorist. Actually, I had the idea, just for a minute, in 1985, that one could possibly do homotopy of exact localizations of a diagram continually, because I had a monostructure for simply such sheaves in a general growth of the topos, something that I have described in the letter to growth of zinc, which was never published, but the letter circulated. And then I asked a bit why there was a meeting in Bangor if he knew that exact localizations of the categories of spaces. He immediately told me there is not, except the trivial. The trivial one collapsed everything to a point. The non-trivial one, so to speak, is just the identity, and that's the only things you can do.  So I stopped thinking about it. Of course, Dwyer was right. There is no, I had, my question was wrong. The question I should have addressed to him, do you know any left exact localizations of a category of diagrams of space? This would have been the right question, okay? But I asked the wrong question, and so I stopped thinking about the subject. This idea. But Charles Rex, maybe in the late 90s, understood that the category of spaces and diagrams of spaces had very nice property. I mean, sometimes we think that the category of set is very nice. I mean, Hilbert said that no one could keep us out of the paradise that Cantor has created for us. And I still believe that the category of set is very nice. But from a matter of your point, sometimes the category of spaces are even nicer. What do you mean by spaces? Do you mean selfishness sets? Yes, that's a good question. Yeah, you could take the category of spaces, a couple of spaces with, but you have to somehow invert a weak motor vehicle. There's a model structure there. And every space is weakly equivalent to a CW complex, and therefore you could take the category of CW complexes. Except that the problem with the CW complexes is very nice, but it's not cataclysm-close. You take the hum between suits again. So you don't see what happens if you exponentiate. And we would like to have a category which is close under exponentiation, for example. And therefore CW complexes is not the best thing to take. CW complexes turns out to be very good, because they are close under exponentiation. And so a good approximation for the category of spaces is the category of CW complexes. Yeah. This exponentiation problem, by the way, was just a critical question for setting this disease about group spaces and so on. It's a typical case of exponentiation. Oh, yes, right. Do not use CW complexes or that. That's what you have to reinvent it as you feel. Aha. You use a cubical set in this case. Well, but don't use that. Okay. Yes, right. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So maybe just a small picture of, I mean, in my talk yesterday, I said that we study spaces by looking at maps into a ring, continuous map into, or maybe smooth map or algebraic map into a ring. And so we look at map R, and we formalize the properties of this object. It is also a ring. And in the case of locale, the ring, or in the case of locale, is 0, 1. I mean, with the topology where 1 is open, the Sierpensky space, that's the theory of locale. No. No. No. Because the topology is... Yes. No, no. There is no... The negation, the... Let's call that Sierpensky. No, no. What I mean is that, okay, the sum is the obvious sum, with 1 plus 1 is 1, and the product is the ordinary product. Yes. Oh. Yes. Okay. That's what I mean. Ah. Yes. Yes. The only thing is that you change the topology to make a semi-continuous function. Yes. But they are actually continuous. I know. But what I mean is that the topology that you take is really the topology of semi-continuous functions. Of course, semi-continuous functions. Because 1 is open, and 0 is not. It's a semi-interface. Well, the semi-continuous functions are continuous. For this, when you choose a certain Sierpensky topology. Well, that's what I choose. Ah. You know that you are laughing, but... Because the point is that, for instance, if you take values in the r-max and such things, okay, then the topology on r-max would be... the correct topology would be the semi-continuous topology. So, to imitate the Sierpensky topology. Well, I guess we are talking about the same thing. We need a slightly different language. This picture, I mean, somehow, there is a map to the Sierpensky space. What did they... somehow the text open some set. Actually, the video description should be open some set. But what happened in the case of the tropos, they maybe as a Cartier was saying that with multi-valued functions, you have a space X right there. And with the multi-value functions, you have some kind of covering of our etal space over X. And the functions itself is defined here. So, that's somehow the picture. And the idea of Grupensky was to say, well, let us study all the etal space over X. Okay? So, this is the category of sheaves over X. This is the tropos of sheaves. This is... And then, you can express this map from E to R by pulling back R to X and looking as a map from E to R X in... So, you put back X to R and take the product and you internalize R and you may study maps from E to R X if you like. Okay? Now, if you want to study homology and homology of sheaves, you need to replace E by chain complexes and I'll have again groups, for example. There could be two chain complexes over E over X. So, they are objects over X and look at the resolution, objective resolution technology, et cetera. But another way of doing this already in affinity is to look at senbichel objects senbichel objects in X to internalize the notion of senbichel object you get senbichel sheaves and do the homotopy theory of senbichel objects in X. So, you mean this is for the Dalkan correspondence? Yeah, but you can do it non-Abelian if you like and you get non-Abelian homology if you do that. There is a model structure here. When you say in ex-Amenian sheaves of X. Ah, yes. So, in other words, in this picture you replace instead of just the pure sets, you have arrows, for example because the senbichel set has arrows and maybe triangles you look at structure like this over over X. Okay. So, this looks very much like a combinatorial representations of a space over X, because at each point you will have a senbichel set which is equivalent to a space by I have to be question. I mean, if you take senbichel object in a sheaves of X, is that a topos? Yes, it is a topos. Right. It is a topos. Yeah, but the one thing it's maybe the first one of the first examples of an infinity topos because the notions of isomorphism between object here is not the notion of usual notions of isomorphism it's notions of equivalence or formative equivalence. So, if you use this notion you do get an example of an infinity topos. Okay. So, so topos theory in some sense is about replacing the Sierpensky space by the category of sets. So, let me draw it like this. In the theory of local or frames you contour maps from X to the Sierpensky space. That's the basic thing. In topos theory you contour maps from X to the category of sets because a family, a sheath can be regarded as a family of set, a sheath over X. You have a point and if you look at the father so for each point of X you have a set and so you look at families of sets parametrized by the beds and so you're actually looking at a map from the space to set. So you start to sort of considering that the category of set is a space itself because a sheath can be regarded as a continuous map from the space to this kind of new space. And this point of view is completely correct in the sense that in topos theory there is a copy of the category of set which is a classifying it's like the affine line it's a classifying object topos and a point of this topos is a set it's like if you look at it a point of this topos, a geometric point of this topos of the set. So now a geometric morphism is the same as choosing an object here because algebraic can be it goes the other way and you just need to interpret x into u so from this point of view an object of the topos is the same thing as a geometric morphism into the space of all sets this represents the space of all sets okay and higher topos theory we want to replace higher topos theory we want to replace the category of set by the category of spaces so we want to have a new form of topos where this would be true that an object in the topos would be regarded as a smooth map from x indicating your space but this is just a geometric picture algebraic can be would have the classifying object topos and I write p because it's about spaces and have the same picture algebraic can be so in other words instead of looking at families of set parametrized by the base point of the space we want to look at families of space parametrized by this point of the space that's what's happening with higher topos theory there's a new notion of space which is based on the idea that a sheaf here is no longer a family of sets parametrized by the points but it's a family of space typically for example bundled in bundled theory there's a topology if you have bundled bundles of geometric kinds of bundles the bundles normally is not discrete the gluing maps are not discrete and there's a problem in geometry you can go around the fact that this is not discrete by looking at gross topos sheaves and etc but you need to go to gross topos for that now we want to take a different point of view but the inventions of the higher topos by Charles Reck I don't know exactly what was his motivation but his observations is this this set so what is this set suppose that you have an object in a topos which is a coordinate of a family so suppose that you have an object let's say b which is a coordinate of some family or diagram so you have a diagram let me write the diagram here I have dr the object in the diagrams and b is a coordinate now if you have you would like to understand how to build things over b in terms of building things over di which mean that if you have some object over b and this is the projection pr you do pr star p and you get a new diagram over your base diagram and you would like to understand in which sense e is obtained from the pi and you would like to put some descent condition so that you have an equivalence category of category between e over b the topos and here I'm pulling back so I have the little pieces e over di and I have a diagram of toposes so I would like to take the projective limit of this in some sense and I would like to say that there is an equivalence of category the diagram is given the diagram is given and we would like to know for which diagram is this true that I will give you examples where this is true and examples where this is false suppose that you have a co-product of two of two things you have first inclusion and B conclusion and this co-product is actually the pull limit of the discrete diagram with two objects A and B and therefore it leads to a diagram like this and you would like to say that this is a product diagram so for each object here you get two objects and you get a filter here and we all know that this is an isomorphism because if you want to construct a bundle over the disjoint union of two objects you just construct something on the first and second and second so the descent condition is true trivially another example is playing with the cleavage relation and the usual descent condition I will not do that I will just give you an example where the general descent idea which is false we will look at the case of a push out and the push out will be really very simple and this is an example by Charles Rex we take two points you map to one point you map to another point so it's two two one so this is just the sum of the territorial object with itself and the push out of that is just one point so this is a push out diagram in any topos in fact this is a push out now let's look at the dual diagram so we have E over one which is E E over one E over one E over three and we would like to know if this is a comeback ok so what is the fabric rock of these two maps so I can write E instead of E over one and ok so I would like to take the fabric rock of these two maps what is this it takes an object X and it takes it to X plus two copies of X over one plus one in fact it's X plus two and here the same thing so we want to look at the pullback now the pullback should be of course in categories so we should have two objects here so that their image with an isomorphism between the two we are not going to ask for inequality so suppose that we have two objects and we make two copies of them we have a first copy for X and second copy and a copy for Y and then we take another model between X plus X and Y one ok another morphism that would be the descent data another morphism between these two things another morphism between these two things would be two asomorphism completely independent so what is this category that you put back it's two objects different and two asomorphism between well if there are two objects like this you could use the first asomorphism to identify and for the other asomorphism you get an automorphism so actually this is the category the pullback will be E to ok E to the loop I mean I'm just a little loop actually this is Z Z is as one invertible generator so it's the the category of Z actions of E which is of course very different from this therefore the descent conditions cannot go it's one of them it's one of them what we have yeah but I remember I had talked about this the descent conditions you wonder this kind of questions and in my early days I would say ok I think I even constructed this example and I say oh it's terrible the descent conditions cannot be true in general ok this was a wrong idea ok the idea that the descent conditions should be true is wrong but Charles Rex said it should be true and we need to change the notions of purpose and this is how higher purposes were invented so what happened with the idea of Charles Rex is that if you look at this diagram if you draw the arrows this diagram in the category of spaces in the category of spaces this diagram has an automorphical limit and the automorphical limit I don't know if you're familiar with that it's just the ordinary you constructed using cone I mean if you want to compute the automorphical limit of something you construct the cone or maybe the cylinder you construct the mapping cylinder of the first map ok so you have A becomes its inclusion in the mapping cylinder and then the mapping cylinder of the second map and so you have A mapping cylinder of the first map U it's included included in the mapping cylinder of the second map it now is included and now you take the push up mv union over A ok taking the automorphical limit was a kind of art for a long time I think the idea of the automorphical limit was first introduced by Graham Siegel the idea of Graham Siegel I guess was that if you have a diagram indexed by a category let's say even in set the usual the limit of the diagram is actually pi zero of the nerve of the category of elements of I so you take the category of elements of I you take its nerve it's a simple object and you take pi zero and that's equivalent and so the idea of Graham Siegel was why should we take pi pi one pi two actually zero in his book on very fatal non-community non-community right, right, right he has a big limit for diagrams because of the big limit and the big limit actually is the fundamental groupoid of this gadget so I guess that group and they can zero already had the idea of automorphical limits but they stopped at one maybe because they didn't have the formalism so the idea of Graham Siegel is that the automorphical limit should be the automorphical type of this so this is called H limit of D and then people I guess can and Bardsfield understood how to construct a motorpy limits, I'm sorry, this is H code limit, I'm sorry H they understood how to construct motorpy limits and things started to develop from that, people in motorpy theory were using motorpy limits motorpy code limits all the time and Charles Beck if you apply the constructions of the motorpy code limit the motorpy push out what you get here is this figure you see you have let's say this is the point A and B and now I have the A, B X, Y and you have yes X is X and Y you have this if you look at the diagram you get this thing you see a circle aha we have a circle therefore if we change the notions of motorpy code limit by the notions of motorpy code limit we will have a general descent theorem but for that we need to have new subjects the motorpy code limit of a diagram of proposes will be a celestial object for example but then you need to rework the whole theory of proposes using spaces or celestial objects this is how the subject started maybe just a word or two to finish so I mean I was fascinated when I was reading the stuff about the motorpy code limit by the fact the sizes of motorpy code limits were absolutely needed in order to have a good compatibility with fixed points and finite limits so I presume that so then this means that in certain circumstances working with ordinary code limits is totally wrong and one has to elevate the situation and work with motorpy code limits so and this is what people do in algebraic topology very currently I mean they use this technique all the time and it's very surprising indeed that then you have this amazing compatibility that for instance if you take if you have a finite compacting on the various terms of the code limits in order to take the fixed points after taking the motorpy code limit it's the same thing as taking the motorpy code limit we have discussions about that and we need to discuss that because I disagree is this the motivation somehow I mean you know the fact that one wants to replace and have a coherent salary the motivation for the amazing thing is that everything we have done so far with tuples so this can be generalized to spaces so you start with so called infinity one categories but or infinity categories we are just let's say categories in virtual work can complexes for example okay and then there is a notion of pre-sheaves in the sense that you need to harm these things into spaces spaces and then there is a notion of localization and of that exact localization and you do that and you get the general higher purposes that's how they are constructed and everything works this is is there another way to think about it because we were saying that if you take central objects in a tuples they form a tuples but then the new ingredient is localizations yes right so could you think of it as performing some kind of localization in a given tuples rather than higher tuples yes you can yeah there are variations right because some aspect of this theory was already present in the work of Roy Wojcicki also because introducing a mutipi metal with algebraic geometry looking at pre-sheaves which is a sebaceous value of pre-sheaf things of this sort so the theory of higher tuples is not coming from nowhere there are various roots but the fantastic thing maybe is that essentially a higher tuples is a characterization theorem of Dury which is that a presentable so-called infinity category don't worry about the terminology but this is essentially categories of over 70% or there are very small is a higher tuples and being higher tuples means that let's say it's a mutipi that exact localization of this kind of thing if and only if the descent condition is true so and the descent conditions means that e over a coelibit of a diagram can be equivalent to the limit of the it becomes completely general and it's even only if this is zero theorem but everything is captured by one descent condition which is general can one go between you say infinity but can one word insert infinity or something between like hand hand tuples how do you like to look at only infinity well yeah that's a good question I don't know what time I have now I still have 35 minutes oh good I almost said everything I wanted to say so at the moment everything is perhaps formal there is also an ocean of elementary we don't know what it should be elementary higher tuples we don't know exactly what this should be but it's based on the theorem of Lurie that if you take Kazna I think it should be regular but maybe it's not Kazna then in a higher tuples there is an ocean of small object so you look at k small objects and also k small maps so a map is k small if the object exp the slice tuples e over y is k small the notions of small map is somehow feather wise you just relativize the tuples over y so there are notions of k small k small is like yeah it's rather standard let me not okay and then you can look at the category of k small maps with a Cartesian square so k small you look at the category of Cartesian square where the vertical maps are k small but with squares which are Cartesian, they want to be Cartesian and this has a final object which in other words there is a universal I write omega just because I want to stress the analogy with a classifying sub-object tuples there is a terminal object the fact that there is a terminal object means essentially but there is a universal k small map as long as k is large enough you need to put some choose k okay and then it means that given a k small map there is a pullback square like this and the pullback square is the map here the pair of maps here is only to be unique so you may think of this as the universe classifying k small maps it's a direct generalizations of the omega where in the case of omega what it classified is the universal monomorphism Jesus, I'm not monomorphistic no, that's the point in fact if you allowed to a little bit of imagination you could remove the k and then you say in the topos there will be a universal map okay in practice there is because whatever you do you always work with k small map for some k so there's always a universal thing and this map here is special because this was maybe observed by one of us here not in the context of topos theory but in the context of mutipita theory this map is univalent so I would like to explain what univalent means I will consider univalent maps in the category of spaces so there are many approaches to univalence but suppose that you have a map in spaces space in the category of spaces so you may think of this map as describing a family of spaces index its equivalent to a family x i or maybe x y spaces indexed by y and univalence means that you don't have a repetition in other words univalence means that x y as a morphic to x y prime should implies that y so this is a universal case yes exactly it's a classification ok now the main thing would be to say y is equal to y prime but no or monotopy so that there is a pact between y and y prime and not only that there is a pact but actually there is an equivalence between the asomorphism here and the pact between y and y prime there is a complete an equation between I would say the space of asomorphism from y to y prime or I would say equivalence monotopy the space of monotopy equivalence between the two fibres and the space of pact between y and y prime that's the notions of univalence and these are classifying maps there are all univalent this is typical of a universal fibrations of any type if you have an anthropology let's say that is based on BG for instance yeah right it's construction exactly exactly one remark the isomorphism which you erased namely x over A plus B is the same the same and the notion of case mode maps yes which you are defining now I think there are notions which should be expressed not for the situation you are looking at but for fibrations fibred category just explain why if you have a vibration you can say for example if you see the vibration as the fiber over some i as families of object indexed by i object of then you can say families of small objects okay independently of the fact what you are looking at is the vibration such that the fiber over each A is A over A but this can be defined for any vibration the same goes for example let me give one example which doesn't fit no no which doesn't fit with what you say suppose you have an internal category internal you can define a vibration by looking at just map into this internal category this vibration will always fiber over B equal and many other vibrations that's a property of vibration let me comment it's a notion of fiber gain not just the vibration for which the fiber over A is E over A let me comment what you just said in your work you have constructed given a map an internal group associated to that given the map for example the objects are the base and given two points let's imagine you have elements the arrows between the two points are the azimorphism or you have even constructed an internal category and in some sense I'm not saying the special case is not important but what I'm saying is that the general situation should be stated in terms of vibrations and then look at the vibrations whose fibers are fiber over A is E over A this is a property of let me comment what you just said I want you to hear I think we can continue this discussion so you have constructed this group associated to a map you may think of this as a a situation of a fiber category you may think of the object over the base and then you have constructed this internal groupoid in the base that represent that and I like this construction and I use it as often as I can it's a very interesting constructions and somehow it is saying that this groupoid this is an azimorphism between two points of the base it's reflect an azimorphism between the fibers that's what you have done now I agree with this philosophy where there is a difference is that what you are comparing here are two objects let's say of a topos if these things are groupoids themselves in other words if there are two vibrations or whatever there is a problem here you will have to put two categories because here you will have to put equivalences so that's the problem in higher topos theory we have everything we don't need to filter things by one category, two categories etc I am not saying anything about higher topos I am saying something about some ideas you may have about families and these ideas are encompassed by the vibrations ok let me add also something about that that what is an elementary higher topos it's still a problem at the moment people using working in so-called homotopy category which is category with homotopy interpretation they want to develop a formal logical system that would fit higher topos theory you don't always say that but I don't know if Thierry would agree with that but Thierry I don't know enough ok but some people at least maybe Mike Schumann and other and so the problem is that these higher topos are hard to formalize using just category theory because we are talking about homotopy pullback homotopy push out everything is up to homotopy and this makes things difficult from the point of view of category theory so there are proposals precisely to develop a kind of model based on query models categories or something like that where fabrations plays an important role in other words a family of objects like P for example here I said there is a family of objects that this family should be expressed by a fabration so things are developing there is not yet a precise formal system of that I am personally thinking about the problem I don't have a complete solution I am sure that your work is relevant your work on fabrations is relevant because in the axiomatic of an element of the idea is that there is a notion of a fabration and then a universal one in addition so instead of having an object omega there is a universe which classify fabrations and this fabration is univalent that is very important that the discovery of Wojcicki Wojcicki was learning type theory and he saw that there are universes in type theory but then he saw that these universes should be universal in some unique way and this is where he had the idea of introducing the notions of univalence for the universe and it turns out that if you take this formal system for multiple type theory where you have a univalent universe you can prove things in type theory that you cannot prove without univalence but it is a very strong axiom it has interesting consequences and some people were able to for example to compute a few multiple groups of spheres using this axiom so it's interesting that possibly we will eventually maybe have a way to compute multiple groups of spheres purely by using logical reasoning type theory is really logical reasoning based on univalence but this is a big project it may take years before giving something really powerful but there is a potential so maybe first can you make a remark I think the situation that Wojcicki called univalence the statement that you have already he proved that because the kappa small object classifier densifies it really up to a multiple he proved that the group point of kappa small max over x is equivalent to the group point of max he doesn't have the name maybe he doesn't he doesn't have the sexy name univalence now and of course he doesn't bother about this rectification issue which is maybe the the most you cannot read a higher proposal I mean Wojcicki is a very interesting character once I had a discussion with him where a group of people and then he said maybe he was over enthusiast he said in his enthusiasm category theory is finish okay I don't know I think he would like to use for foundations of mathematics and it would be that formally is not category theory it's a dream who knows maybe this I don't know I have a different opinion but it's a matter of opinion so it could be that Luri already had the idea of univalence before he certainly has the formal statement for infinity he just doesn't consider it in this rectified statement but what do you have on the board maybe just to finish about univalence it's kind of fun to do the following you take a fabrication which is not univalent you take a fabrication which is not univalent so it means intuitively that there are fibers which are asomorphic and the paths between these two the base points don't match very well the asomorphism so you feel that maybe you could even have fibers which are asomorphic and so therefore you could reduce the family it means that you have many copies of the same thing and you could maybe compress and in fact there is a compression give a fabrication you can always compress compress it you can always find another fabrication peeperon univalent in a pullback square and how can you do that well you can do it directly or if you have the universal fabrication it's very simple you classify your fabrication in omega prime omega you classify it and you take the image and you take the reaction for the variable of water you see the incomprensible incomprensible incomprensible fabrications those that cannot be compressed further or they are univalent fabrications they are not necessarily universal you see but they are all somehow sub-objects of the universe so the universe is really a union of all univalent fabrication that maybe I'm not universal okay I think


Hi everybody, Joe for jaspyscasebrakes.com coming at you with 2019 Panini Select Football Team All Edition, this is a China exclusive. Pretty cool, tiered random team break number two, this has those snake skin, or no, dragon scale parallels which go for a lot. And yeah, there it is, the exclusive dragon scale parallels number to 88 which is pretty awesome. We tiered up the teams and we have an early bird special here. So if you're one of the first seven of the 10 spots sold, right there, you have a shot at an early bird spot. The early bird catches the worm. So different dice roll, five and two, seven times, name on top, one, two, three, four, five, six, and seven. After seven, Jeff Dorlak, there you go Jeff. After lucky seven times, oh, you were the first spot in too. You get into this break. Lucky seven for us, but apparently in China, eight, is their lucky number. So lucky number's all over the place. Big thanks again to all of these people for getting in there, the tiered teams right here. Let's roll it, let's randomize it, two and a four, six times for each list. One, two, three, four, five, six, Matt Medland down to BJ Jordan. Two and a four, six times for the teams. Two, three, six. Nope, that's five, I need one more, right? Yeah, six, again, there we go, there's six. The Giants Group down to the Seahawks Group. We've got River Monsters on Animal Planet, if you wanna join me on River Monsters today. Still, yeah. Channel 282 on Direct TV. This break brought to you by Direct TV. Matt Medland, Giants Browns Texans.  Should I alphabetize by your first name? Sure, why not? There you go, that'll be a little bit easier. You don't have to kind of hunt for these teams anyway when I pull these cards out. All right, any traits? Here are the boxes right here. Remember I drew those squigglies on here so we can just grab those boxes and we all know they're from the same case. Exclusive parallels right here. My understanding T-Mall is like Amazon. It's like Alibaba, T-Mall, two big e-commerce services. For us it's Amazon, it's a big e-commerce service. So it's one of those website exclusives. All right, no trades? All right, no trades. TWC trade window closed, let's print, let's rip. Just five cards per box, it's like a choice break. Right here. Good luck everybody. Not a huge fan of that clear packaging but we're gonna have to live with it. All right, so Julio Jones leads us off. That's field level Julio Jones. Jared Stidham, nice to 88. Dak Prescott, 78 out of 88. Brett Farr, field level and Kishan Johnson, no not that one, different Kishan Johnson. So that goes to the Cardinals, that'll be for James. And because of the exclusive nature of these products, ladies and gentlemen, I mean like this field level Brett Farr, Dragon Scale could go for a lot more than you may think. This goes to the Packers, that will be for B.J. Jordan. 78 out of 88 Dak Prescott and these rookie ones, this might go for a hundred bucks, close to it. Maybe depends on the premier level, concourse level and whatnot. 47 out of 88 and there's the Julio Jones right there. Might as well just only five cards a box or might as well top load everything. Not sure how many cards are in the NBA version. I think that's, is that coming up next? All right, we got Pat Tillman for the Cardinals. That'll be for Jimmy Connell, James with that one. We got an Aaron Rodgers, another Packer, 44 out of 88 on that one. That will be for, there's the Packers again. It's kind of hard, tier teams are kind of hard. I have to search for all the, B.J. Jordan with the Packers, there you go. And then we've got Aaron Jones for the Packers, nice. It's another one for B.J. Jordan. I don't know how much of this we have, Joe. Whatever's on the site, 35 out of 88 miles Garrett. That's for the Browns, that's going to go to, we've got the Browns in this one. That goes to Matt Medlin and the Browns. That's 35 out of 88. So this is the shortest printed one. That's the field level right there. And then we got Darwin Thompson, silver. Next box, Adam Thielen. Field level for the Vikings. B.J. Jordan with the Vikes. Tyreek Hill, concourse, 35 out of 88. Chiefs, Bill with the Chiefs. Baker Mayfield, 13 out of 88. Matt Medlin with another Brown. And we've got Derek Thomas, 81 out of 88. Chiefs, that's going to go to Bill and the Chiefs. And there's Alan Robinson Silver. Two boxes to go. We've got the, we've got the Dragon Scale on top and a thicker card, a relic perhaps. Dak Prescott, Dragon Scale, Cowboys, Bill. 38 out of 88. Got Tevin Coleman, Dragon Scale for the Niners. That'll be for Jeff in that early bird spot. 22 out of 88. Todd Gurley, 25 out of 88 for the Rams. That's going to be for Mark. Now O, the Redskins, Rams, Bucks. That's field level, that's the shorter printed of the three different tiers. And it's a Viking, it's Alexander Madison. Jersey and autograph. That's not bad. Vikings, that goes to B.J. Jordan. His last spot, Mojo spot. 20 out of 49. And a Miles Sanders Silver for the Eagles. I think that's going to go to B.J. Jordan for the Jaguars, Eagles, Bears, Jets combo. I think Jason Jaspie is on the hunt for a Dragon Scale, Miles Sanders. Just throwing that out there if anybody gets one of those today. Or he might be reaching out to you if he sees that you got one. This guy's hunting for River Monsters and he's just, he's actually in the water. Keenan Allen, Chargers. That'll be for Jeff. And we've got Cole Holcomb, 61 out of 88. For the Redskins, Cole Holcomb going to Mark. These Dragon Scales do look pretty sharp. 77 out of 88, Jameson Crowder, Jets. That's going to go out to B.J. Jordan. Couple more to go. We got a T.Y. Hilton field level. Colts, B.J. Jordan, Broncos-Bangles-Colts combo. 62 out of 88.  Saquon Barkley, Silver, Giants. That'll be for Matt Medlin. There you go. Another T Mall break in the books. I'm Joe for Jaspy's CaseBreaks.com. I'll see you for the next one. Bye-bye.


Hi everybody it's Sam at Mixed Up Craft, thank you for watching today. So I just wanted to do a very quick video. I get asked a lot about the Kalal glue and if it is the same as the Beacon 3-in-1 glue. So I just thought I'd just show you them here and I'll do a quick little test from what I can see it is. They're both solvent-based, they both feel, look the same, they smell the same so I am going to, and from what I've used I've been using them in a mixture of tutorials so you would have seen this appear in videos because I just thought I would rather use it for a few weeks and then do this video so I can you know be as truthful as I can and I'm pretty confident to say that yes I believe they're both the same. I've looked at the ingredients and again I'm not really up with that kind of thing but it all looks pretty similar. The question that I get asked is are they work the same and I believe they do. So the reason I'm doing this is because I think the Beacon 3-in-1 is easier for people to get in the States. Again I could be completely wrong. You can get this in the States. I know some people have said that they get it really easily but others have said that they can't so that's why they've been asking then about the Beacon 3-in-1. These are used widely within like model making in places like that or those kind of crafts but Crafters Companion have raved about this for years and it's the one that they sell off of their website. You can get it anywhere as well. This one I actually got from Crafts Mathic through Amazon. I've brought from them direct and I didn't realise that they obviously have a shop through Amazon as well so they sent me or they didn't send me I brought this one myself but it came through them. So I've got this one because what I've been doing is I usually this is the first time I brought the big one. A few of you sent me the links to the large one because I didn't know it even existed. This is a thousand mil so it works out cheaper to buy this and this one only cost me 15.99. So again it's much much cheaper because I think on creating craft and possibly Crafters Companion I think creating craft do four for something like 13.99 but then you've got your postage and packaging and then you've got creating craft do three for 9.99 I think but you get a thousand mil. This is the winner. This is the best value for money but what I've got here is an old tonic studios tacky glue holder and I just love the fine nozzle on this. You would see this feature in all of my tutorials but the one thing that the beacon does have is it does have a nice applicator so it's easy you can just use that straight away because it's quite thin. The smaller that you would have seen me use of the Kalao has that twisty it's just like this but in red so it's exactly the same it's clear bottle and it has all this in red but I do I don't I don't ever use this bit it's meant to be to smooth it out I think I never use it and I do find that this traps a lot of air I'm not getting that with this and I don't really get it with this either so yeah they're just a few kind of things that I've got a couple of observations ready but I thought I would just to count this one into here so I cleaned this out made sure you know got rid of all the white tacky glue there was only a little bit left in the bottom but I'm finding that it's lasting me a lot longer because obviously less is coming through the finer nozzle so again you know you're stretching your glue even further so it's just like you know you're art glitter glues and the BB the Dawn Bibi what we're doing putting on there the Dawn Bibi fine precision tip glue that I've used as well they're both very good glues along with the Cosmic Shimmer and there's the Nouveau one as well but so for me these are the glues that well it's gonna be the clouds that's just I think because you can get this one now this is all I'm ever gonna use it's just brilliant stuff it really is you do have to take caution with it so I wouldn't really you it's not the kind of glue you want to use with children because it is solvent-based it's highly flammable it does have an odour to it as well so you do have to take those factors into account but for paper crafting to get that completely flat surface you know so you've got no warping nothing because this is waterproof so it's got no water in it at all it's just brilliant stuff so I just thought I'd do a quick little test I've got my standard 300 gsm cardstock I use this for my card blanks I use it for box-making all that kind of stuff I've just got some paper here this is what I use this is from the paper addicts paper pad so I'm gonna do one side with the Kalau and it just dries so quick but I use hardly anything now I'm gonna stick this one on this side here and it just the thing I love about this is the stiffness that when it dries it becomes so stiff so if you are using a lighter weight cardstock once you add your mats and layers together it becomes so solid it feels like a 300 plus gsm cardstock so it is really good if you do have those you know lighter cardstocks and I know lots of you have started using this I've been receiving I get comments and messages sent of people saying it's just amazing stuff so I'm now going to use the beacon on this side and you can see it's it's exactly the same and like I said it smells the same so it's just a probably a slightly different formula but they're both yeah both the same so I'm just gonna stick them down I'm just gonna leave them a few minutes just so you can see and yeah that's it really okay so that's just starting to stiffen now and it's nice and strong you can see there if I line that up it's just it's exactly as it is it's perfectly flat there's not one ounce of warping you can't you can't physically get that to warp because of the ingredients in this and the fact that there's no water I don't know why it's three in one I don't know what the three is so it just says here advanced craft glue it's got acid-free waterproof and then it just says it's crystal clear trans oh yeah and then that's all oh instant grab fast dry glue that's what I like it is that instant grab so yeah I hope that's answered a few questions don't really know what I say on it because it is what it is it's yeah this is an all-purpose glue the kalau I'll share links below I should try and find the links to this one and I think I may have got the last one on Amazon through that company but I'm sure they'll be there well I know there will be more because this is widely available so I will yeah I'll try and look out for those links but yeah so either or they're both really good if this one was in a big bottle like this and it was good value for money I get the three in one as well so yeah I'm not they are just equally as good but yeah so that's it so hope that's answered like I said any questions and yeah thank you for watching see you soon bye


Open your eyes! Kids, cut, go to your T-R-A-T-E-S! Welcome back to our YouTube Direct, Steve Gets Up Corbin. And you follow us on Instagram and do yourself a small juicy gong. It's so juicy. Thank you all so much for watching on our official Twitter account. Your baby's diaper's got some juicy content. And today we're reacting to a new trailer that just dropped this morning. What? It's called Panga. Panga. Panga. Cogana. Cogana. Jossie. Rob. Is it how you say her last name? Cogana Rob. Cogana Rob. Or is it Cogana? From Queen. Renau. Renau. Is that a French last name? Is she like Kalki? I have no idea. She's Indian and French? Couldn't tell you. Well, why not? Do you want to do your homework? No. But yes, this is a new trailer that just dropped this morning. And she's obviously an amazing actress and we love her. So we'll be the judge of that. Here we go. Jaya Nigam. India captain. 2010. Four times. One of the best competitors. Kupati. Kupati. They're playing Kupati. We've learned about this sport. I know. Okay. I thought you forgot.  And now you're in the A.P. team. Oh, you're back again. Do you want to do your homework? Good morning. Drive slowly. No, I'm driving slowly. What? You don't know? Who knows Kupati? Jaya was playing Kupati on the air that day when she was on the railway. All the big things were made with my power. I'm a mother and no one dreams of a mother. When a person's time changes people around them become aware of it. Mom, what's your age? I'm 30. Didn't you come to Khaidu to work? I'm the one who's giving you another chance. There must be a lot of problems that I won't remember for the next year. I'll only remember that you had a chance and you made fun of me. You can come back to the A.P. team if you fight for the girls of the A.P. team. Let me try. I want to get engaged again. I want to get engaged to the girls. Now that you've given me an interview don't be proud. Don't be proud of yourself. There must be a lot of problems that I won't remember for the next year. I want to come back as soon as I retire. Mom, I don't know why you're making me upset. I'm not asking for your support. I'm not even supporting you. You don't want your support. You won't get my support. And they've made this in sugar. Who drinks tea with sugar? Mom, who didn't bring the laddoos? Interesting ending. That was a really good trailer. Really good trailer. I like that one and I'm really interested in this film. I unashamedly got the feels on that one. I was getting emotional at the end. The score was phenomenal. Wow, yes. I was getting emotional. It was a really good score. Obviously you could tell that the acting is going to be top notch because it's Congrana. I apologize because I'm probably saying her name wrong. But you know the acting is going to be that. But the story looked really good. It looked like sports movies are always fun. And I'm assuming this is a true story. Yeah. It looked like a merry-com slash a chop to India type story of somebody who was really good and then maybe she had a kid and now society is looking down on her for following her dreams even after she had a kid.  Yeah. Wow, what a shock. I know, it's crazy. But yes, that's what it looks like to me if I'm totally wrong. I'm totally wrong. But I will see this film because this looks really, really good. The quality looks really, really high. And obviously the score was phenomenal as well. Also, I do love that we understand what sports she's playing. I know. And would like to learn more about it before watching the movie. But it was great because if this happened before that video we would not know what she's talking about. We'd be like, what is this? What is kabaddi? What the heck is that? What is kabaddi? I don't know what that is. We do because we've seen a video and it looks really fun to me. I didn't know you could kick people unless I'm forgetting the video. I didn't know you could kick people. There's no way I was more tagged.  Yeah. Yeah. And good. I hope you can't kick people. It makes it more fun.  This really seems like at the heart of it is a comeback story and not giving up and pushing against the odds and the naysayers. And Panga is inspired from the life of a national-level kabaddi player from India. It follows a triumph, struggle, and overcoming of stereotypes. It shows how important the love and support of your family is for you to be successful. Mmm. Yeah. That's what we got through. And it's directed by Shwini Ayer Tuwari. Who did the... Say that name for me. Borreliki Barfi. Yeah, we've reacted to that trailer a while back. I remember it. And I think she was also... I don't remember the content, but I remember doing that reaction in there as well. I didn't recognize anybody but her. Apparently this person was in Gangs of Wasper, though. So maybe... And Ramleela. So we've clearly seen her before. But I didn't recognize... Right, it must have been smaller roles. I didn't recognize anybody else, though. That was really good. Does this come out the same day that the Pika one comes out? It comes out January 24th. I think so. That's right around the... That's right around it. The Pika... The Pika... The Pika... The Pika... The Pika... The Pika... The Pika... The Pika... Sorry, I'm looking up when the... Her... Her... The... 10th. Okay, no. Her's comes out the 10th of January and then... A week or two later. A week or two later. It comes out the 24th. Which... That's great. I love that this slate of... This is because the Pika one looked really, really good. Like it looked like... Is this when your award movies come out often? I remember us asking... Gully Boy came out this time last year. I remember us asking that before and I don't remember what the answers were in terms of what the seasons are for you guys in terms of your award season because ours is definitive here. It's been this way since I was a kid. So, I don't know. No idea. And I don't know which is the granddaddy of them all. Like here... Filmfare. I think it's filmfare, I believe. Yeah, there's only three here that are the big ones and they happen in the order that they're the biggest out in terms of people paying attention and actors. It's the globes, the sags and then the Oscars but we also pay attention to the BAFTAs as well. Not as intently as the Big Three. So, I have no idea. You think what is the big granddaddy of them all? I think it's filmfare. Yeah, I don't know. I think that's what it is. And also the ones that are respected because like we have some here that are the People's Choice Awards. The Kids' Choice Awards. Yeah, that's true. So respected. And the globes is by the Foreign Press, the Hollywood Foreign Press. The sags are by actors and the Oscars are by the Motion Pictures Association. The Academy. So as far as like the level of artistic merit and stamp of approval from the highest level of artistry recognition, it's the Oscars. Yeah, but that was great. I love that trailer, the music and everything about it looked really, really good. Really nice. It's going to be a great film. It's as good as it looks. Also, I want to play a comedy. I want to learn it more. Yeah, a comedy looks really fun. Just avoiding people. It looks fun. It looks complicated. It looks getting kicked people in the face. That looks like a game I enjoy.


Hi everyone, Shawn with jaspyscasebreaks.com here doing 2015 contenders blaster one box break random team number five where No vet common ship and we're giving away all these teams top. Yeah, we're giving away 10 teams in Three box select pick your team number 12 break so At the end of the break We're gonna take all the customers names randomize them and top 10 names will be paired up with these Corresponding teams so number one on the randomizer ends with the packers number ten on the rent and rise random The Giants and so on and so forth in between But first the break itself Here's our list of customers from Adam Schwarzman down to David Trann and last Bob Mojo and the teams from the Cardinals down to the Washington football team dice world randomized both lists and pair them up Separate dice roll separate randomized are at the end of the break to give away those ten teams four and a two six times Good luck six and final time from Alec Harrison down to Joshua cherry Six times on the randomizer six times on the dice and six times on the teams six and final time Jacksonville Jaguars down to the Carolina Panthers six times six times Not gonna read through the whole list here, but let's get them all on screen no trade windows since this is a filler break Some of the highlights here Titans Marcus Marriota Omar's we we've got Melvin Gordon Ryan Redmond Raiders Amari Cooper Joshua cherry James Winston Ryan Redmond the Buccaneers as well. Cool. So let's print this out. Um, I can see that I Think he kind of showed it last year. So here's our box. Oh talk girly rookies as well Rams that's Alec Harrison There's our full list That's right. Seahawks do have a locket. Yeah, so let's see if we can find any rookies in here James Winston rookie ticket relic Bucket ears Ryan Redmond Tom Brady Bucking here for the Patriots and Omar's a week another James Winston Bucking ears Ryan Redmond See what he can do this year and We got a little die cut Andrew luck for the Colts and Steven Surrey So you guys that's the break now. Let's give away those 10 spots So here is the original list of customers again from Adam back down to David We're gonna randomize the list and paste it here. So Two and a four six times on the randomizer six in final time Omar down to Alec Harrison and down to Miles Evans six times on the randomizer Six times on the dice and here we go So Omar with the Packers Ryan Redmond the Cowboys Spiro Vela Sackos with Washington Alec Harrison with the 49ers Ryan Redmond the Rams Mark Haraki with the Lions Jordan Malari with the Jags Omar with the Seahawks David Tran with the Bears and Alec Harrison with the Giants There you go guys That's the randomizer pick your team number 12 coming up next I'm Sean jazzy's case breaks calm. That was 2015 contenders blaster one box break random team number five from jazzy's case breaks calm Thanks for hanging out. See you next time


The wheat markets have declined in recent weeks. My guest is Frank Olson, an extension economist at North Dakota State University. And Frank, since we last talked, there's been a lot of activity that has been influencing the markets. Yeah, there certainly has been, Doug. The couple of things that have come out. First is some of the information from USDA, updated information, primarily on the corn side, which is really one of the driving forces in the wheat market right now as well. First, there was some changes in the acreage report as well as quarterly stocks report. It turns out that we had more corn acres planted this year than people had expected. And that high prices that we've seen the last several months have really done their job in trying to pull back the demand portion, which means that the stocks that we have available going into the rest of the year have been higher than expected. And that, the combination of those two things, have put quite a bit of pressure on not only the corn markets, but also the wheat market. In the production side, though, with winter wheat as the harvest has moved north, yields have been a little better than expected. And that has been one of the bright spots for the farmers' end of things. As we started in Texas and moved into Oklahoma, that was the heart of the drought area, those are the areas that were most heavily hit and had very, very poor yields. But as we moved into southern Kansas and then on into northern Kansas, yields started to improve and now as we're moving into southern Nebraska, reports are coming back that yields are actually a little bit better than they had expected. They're still below average, but again, better than people had expected. And part of that is because of the quality. We're getting very high-quality grain coming off and the test weights have actually been higher than expected, which again has helped on the yield side. But related back to your previous comment, you're expecting corn, to continue to be the leader here for the next month or two. That's correct. For right now, the corn stocks are the tightest and corn, to a lesser degree, soybeans are really the price leader in the market right now and wheat is kind of having a follower position. And part of that is, of course, is because of the potential linkage between wheat feeding and corn needs. But as you look ahead for the next crop report, what do you expect from that given the conditions that you have in the northern plain? Yeah, in the August 11th reports, which the combination of the world supply demand estimates being updated as well as an update on the crop production, are going to be very key for the wheat market because when the acreage report was taken or the survey was taken for that, the North Dakota and northern plains region was still well behind in their planting progress. And USDA is going to resurvey North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Minnesota to try and get a better handle on how many acres of wheat actually got planted. The results from that survey are going to come out in that production report. And so that will be an additional adjustment. And in my opinion, the reports that we've seen so far have really not accounted for the production problems and the planting progress that we made up here. We're going to have a much more drastic cutback in spring wheat acres than I think most people expect. What about on a global situation? What's the supply and demand look like there? OK, on the global side, again, we've got to understand that about 50% of our wheat gets sold overseas. And so the international market is very critical for the wheat complex. One of the things that's a very quick update, the European community is going to have an OK year this year, not a banner year, but the drought conditions were moderated earlier on. The Black Sea region is having some mixed problems. There's part of the Ukrainian area that's had too much rain, so there's concern about quality issues. And now there's some drier conditions showing up in one of the key growing regions in the Russian production area. So we're going to have to watch those as we move forward in time also. So what's Russia's stance right now? Well, so far Russia has been very aggressive in their export market, in their export bids. They're trying very desperately to buy back some of the business that they lost because of their export ban last fall. And right now they're being very, very price competitive. So we'll, again, have to watch to see how much of their old crop sales as well as how much of their expected production are they going to try and sell at these low prices. So in terms of general strategies, is it sort of a wait-and-see situation? For right now, I believe it is. Now, some of that will depend upon the situation the farmer's in. If you're in an area where you need to move some wheat out of storage to be able to make room for corn harvest, I think the mid to late August time period would be a good time to try and get some of that done. For those that have additional storage space, if you're in a cash flow position to be able to hold it for a while, I think there'll be some additional opportunities as we move into fall. I'm afraid a very interesting market will keep eye on it thanks for sharing with us, and we'll talk to you next month. All right, thank you, Dr.