Hey, what's up guys, this is Alex from Xtrades back to you with another weekly trade ideas list. I hope everybody had a wonderful weekend. I just got to chill out a little bit, got to rest my brain, ready to rock for next week. If you weren't tuning in last week, we did have some new stuff come in. The market finally was able to get some relief from the debt ceiling issue. They were able to finally avoid default and buy and sign the bill into action. Another thing we have is the non-farm payrolls that came out. So we did add 339,000 new payrolls, almost double the consensus. Unemployment rate also ticked up just a little bit to 3.7% kind of a mixed signal. So it was a little confusing, but market liked it. I feel like they liked the fact that despite interest rates going up, people are still getting jobs, economies doing okay, kind of giving that soft landing narrative. But this week, let's go ahead and get into the economic calendar. You can see we have S&PUS services, PMI, and also ISM services and also factory orders. So I'd say Monday is probably the biggest data set we have. It's not very stacked this week. Last week, we had a little bit more data and we had a little bit more event risk this week, not so much until the CPI next week. Tuesday, June 6th, we have none scheduled. Wednesday, June 7th, we have the US trade deficit and consumer credit. Thursday, just the usual initial jobless claims and wholesale inventories. So not too much data this week. Might be a little bit quiet on that front, but hopefully we can find some volatility in the market, get some range, because I feel like it's felt a little bit slow, even though we've been going up, it's just been kind of melting up. So VIX is hitting new lows and you know, it just feels kind of slow. So hoping we can get some range next week and maybe get a little bit more volatility. All right. And for the setups this week, I do have four to go over. So last week, I feel like the setups weren't the best. Honestly, I feel like TLT, the bonds did okay. They rallied up one or two percent. You could have made some money on calls there. Target dipped below 52 week lows and it did break that major support that we were looking at. So it was kind of like a risk off, but now it's starting to bounce a little bit. So I feel like if they could reclaim, you know, it could be a good trade still. It's probably a better long term trade or like a couple of months out of swing, just because we are at those 52 week lows and it might need some time to recover. And then another one we had last week was also Oracle. It did not reject really heavily off that all-time high resistance that I was looking for. So that kind of made its way into the list again. It's kind of unchanged. It really didn't do much, but I still like the setup. So we'll just go over it again and reiterate that. But our first one here, we're looking at Roku. So for longs, I feel like this is probably the best looking one. I really couldn't find too many longs on tech or anything that was overextended that I like to the upside. But Roku here, you can see it's breaking out of this downtrend. Got to test one, test two, test three, and finally broke out to the upside. So I was able to confirm two candles outside the breakout.  It's not really big. It's a small base candle. But in this area, there is no apply candles. So this is all cell imbalance. And I could feel back up and head up to the 6465 area. So it looks pretty good. Really not much resistance or anything over here until you get up to here. So I feel like this looks a little bit more favorable to the upside, assuming that the market can take up and continue its run, I'm guessing that the NASDAQ would have to keep running for this thing to run. But you never know, because Roku is kind of a high growth name. And it kind of has a mind of its own. So it can run with other high growth names, even though, you know, tech could stay flat or go red, high growth names can still run up as people are looking for high beta names, while volatility is a little bit lower, and the regular indexes aren't moving as much. So you can consider Roku kind of like a high beta name. Another high beta name would be like, you know, UPST, the ARC ETF, that's kind of a high beta name. It's got a lot of exposure to Tesla and other high growth names that really aren't profitable. I mean, Tesla is profitable, but ARC does have a lot of high growth names that aren't even turning a profit. So they kind of rely on the future and hoping for future profitability. And that's kind of what people bank on. And that's why you see higher volatility in those high beta names. So Roku here looking pretty good, you can see it held this 5360 support, it'll hold that the last couple of weeks, kind of broke under it briefly, but it was able to reclaim over that. And then once they got over the downtrend line, you can see it's starting to pick up some momentum here closed up 2.72% on Friday. So pretty good. Not too bad. I wouldn't say it's too overextended. Roku can definitely move higher than you know, a couple of percent. So I wouldn't say this was a huge close for Roku is pretty, almost pretty standard for Roku to be honest. And it's really been stuck in this range for a while. It just broke down. Now starting to make a little bottom held that 5360 and now breaking out of the downtrend. So I'd say it looks pretty good to the upside. So like I said, if the market can take up, we can see some bullish momentum, I will look for trades to the upside on this one. So I do want some long exposure. If the next shorts that we're looking at don't play out, I do want to be able to have some type of long exposure. Otherwise, you know, keep looking for calls on spy and QQQ as usual, keep buying dips but not swinging calls on spy or QQQ because it's just too extended for me. So that's Roku looking at calls. So for our next three here, these are hard time for him setups. A lot of them you can kind of see more on the one week. They are a little bit overextended. Google here, you can see it's pulling up in the 61.8% retracement. If you watch my other videos, I think it was maybe last week or maybe the week before, maybe it was last week. QQQ also pulling into the 61.8 and then I provided a couple examples of 61.8% rejections on other stocks like HYG, FXI when you're measuring a Fibonacci retracement to the downside. So if you want to go check that out and learn a little bit more about the 61.8% retracement, you can see, you know, that it can be a rejection area. So it's kind of the same idea. Just going to be looking for a rejection on this. You might need to take out the week's low. Week's low would be this candle right here at 122 flat. That could be a better reversal signal if you want to be a little bit more patient. Otherwise, if you wanted to, you know, start looking at puts up here, go further out, deal with a little bit of upside risk if it doesn't need to happen and you can wait for the 61.8% rejection to play out. Obviously, risk off would probably be, you know, if it got over like 128, 129, 130 area for, you know, a further out swing. Obviously, you know, 130 area too high for a day trade and I doubt it would hit that high in a day anyways. So over Google here, same idea as QQQ last week. QQQ kind of broke over the 61.8. Just a little bit. I'm still holding July puts on that. I feel like it's going to pull back eventually markets looking a little frothy up here. Interest rates are still high. There's still a chance that the Fed could raise interest rates after that labor report, but you know, there is like an 80% chance, I think, on the Fed futures that they are going to pause. You never really know, but either way, macroeconomic risks are still there and you know, this could be relatively short-term pullback, but I feel like it will pull back soon. VIX is getting really low and this is when you kind of want to start getting cautious and it kind of plays into that saying, you know, when the VIX is high, it's time to buy. When the VIX is low, take it slow. So that's why I've been kind of looking for more put swings on these large cap names the last couple of weeks. I feel like it's just better risk to reward and that did come with a little bit of opportunity cost. Obviously, I missed a little bit of upside. We had one on Apple hit a major resistance and pulled back for a couple of days, pulled right into our trendline price target and bounced right off of it. So you can still play shorts on the large caps and big tech. You just have to time them pretty good and obviously, you know, you don't always want to time the market. It's better to just have time in the market rather than timing the market. But short setups, you know, they can still work. You just have to be kind of quick while volatility is low because those dips do get bought up. So for Google here, hopefully we can see a 61.8% rejection and in my previous videos, I explained this is called the golden ratio. This is usually the most sought after Fibonacci retracement. And if you're doing a down measure, you're looking for a rejection. And if you're doing an up measure for uptrend, you're looking for a bounce after a pullback. That's for Google looking at puts. If you wanted to wait for that 122 flat, which is the weekly low from last week, if you want to wait for that to get taken out, that's a good signal. Be a little bit more patient. You can do that. This weekly candle does have a nice like lower shadow wick. So you can see there's a little bit of buying pressure and it pushed up into the end of the week. But candle still closed a little bit red. But like I said, that 122 flat could be a good reversal signal. So if it gets under that, that could be a little bit better. So Google here, looking at puts, maybe look a little bit further out for this one. Give it time because it's still extended and ball totally is low. So bulls are still in play. Next for Oracle here, we had this in the list last week. So it's the same thing pulling into this all-time high resistance, which is at 106.34. The weekly candle was not able to close over that for a breakout. Obviously there's no rejection yet or anything. So you might want to wait for a rejection candle at least on the daily. Kind of give you a signal at this all-time high resistance. Ideally last week we were looking for it to get under Friday's low of last Friday. You can see it was not able to do that. So I hope now you can see why that was kind of the trigger point to get under that 104.03. And look, it was not able to do that and it didn't march higher. So I feel like it's kind of the same thing. You'd have a little bit better risk to reward up here versus down here. So maybe it could pull back into that same level and try to hold up there. If you wanted to be a little bit more patient, you could wait for that 104.03, the same level. Wait for that to get broken. You could even set an alert, go to add alert, and we'll put a breakdown. So it's literally the same analysis from last week. It's just actually a little bit higher from last week. So we were looking at it when it was down here after this Friday close. This is the current Friday close. So it's a little bit higher. Either way, last week never got that signal under 104.03. The Friday low is extremely important to get under. It's kind of like waiting for a weekly candle low to get taken out except on a daily time frame. This is also the Friday's low. So you do want to see that get taken out. In order to go lower, fill up this big buy inbounce candle. Maybe pull into this 103 area. You can see there's a little resistance area here at 103. So that could be a short-term price target. Under 104 are likely to go to 103. And it would have to break under 103 to go lower after that. So same analysis as last week. You can see the KDJ up here still crossing to the upside. So momentum has not completely slowed. If you want to wait for that to cross down, you could do that. If you want to add this indicator, just go to indicators, type in KDJ. I use this KDJ indicator by IM altcoin. So you could do that. Nice little crossover signals. You can see you get a crossover signal downside here. Nice pullback. And once it was able to get back up, short momentum, nothing crazy. Really big momentum to the upside once it crossed over right here. And you can see it correlates with this up here. And you can even make it turn red or green. Give you easy signals. Obviously it's nothing to trade by itself, but it is a good little momentum indicator. Crosses over a little bit faster than the MACD. So it can kind of give you earlier crossover signals than your standard MACD. Oracle here looking at puts. Same thing as last week. Wait for it to get under 10403 if you want a better signal. If you want to get it up here and start getting puts up here, obviously go a little bit further out. Deal with upside risk because you don't have that signal yet. May have to start small. If you're adding in a riskier area, always start with one or two contracts. Leave some room to maybe add later. Maybe leave room to add once it gets under your confirmation level. But if you feel like it's really going to pull back from here, maybe a good spot to add because it did not clear that 10634. So Oracle looking at puts again. Next we're going into Nvidia. So this is another one week time frame setup. Kind of zoom out to see this just because this Fibonacci retracement all the way from 21 down to 2022 lows in October. So you do it to zoom out to see this one. But you can see once I got over the 100% here, huge breakout obviously that runs into your first price target of the 1.272, which is this extension right here. And usually after this big breakout stocks will sometimes see a rejection right at the 1.272 extension. And then it'll kind of pull back into the 100% area, which is your main breakout area from prior. So it could pull back and back test that obviously it's not going to always happen exactly like that. I can give you an example on Google here from 2020. So similar Google broke out in 2020. Same thing. You got a down measurement here. You got the 100% here. This is your breakout level of resistance. Once it got up there, hit its first price target of 1.272. You can see right here rejected. Try to back test the area kind of failed went lower before going higher. So the 1.272 is a natural rejection area just because that is the first extension target of the Fibonacci retracements. So it's your first extension. Then after that, I think it goes into like 1.41 and then 1.6. I think it's 1.618. You can see it kind of rejected that 1.618 here. So that's just a little example of the 1.272 extension, which is also just 127.20. The 1.272 is obviously just shortened. So I feel like Navita could get some resistance here. You can see that the KDJ on the one week is starting to slow up a little bit. Obviously there's a couple of false signals here, except for this buy signal right here. You get short green. Obviously it had earnings gapped up heavy. So that signal worked out pretty good. You have a fake out right here on the KDJ and then a couple of weekly candles of green right here as well on the KDJ.  You need to be careful with the KDJ because you can get false signals, but this could be a little sign of momentum slowing. If you go down to the daily also the last time we had a red KDJ to the downside, which is right here. It had only one or two day pullback, but it did signal a little pullback. So you could have made a little bit on that. Obviously not as much as you would have made to the upside. And then you get a short two day KDJ run right here where you can see that little slice of green only two days. So once it gets extended like this, the KDJ cats are giving false signals just because you know it's still holding up. It's really high and it's just a it's a pretty tough area. But either way, KDJ crossing over to the downside here. So if you want to go further out on this, I feel like Nvidia could be a good put trade. If you go a couple of months out, obviously you're kind of going against the monster here, but it did hit one trillion a market cap. It's very, very overvalued in terms of price to earnings ratio. If you pay attention to that at all, obviously, you know, when momentum is crazy like this, nobody really cares about PE. But fundamentally, you know, a lot of people do look at price to earnings ratios and this thing is just to the sky right now. So we're kind of going against the grade here, but could be a good hedge, could be a good protection just because it's so overextended, tax running up, AI is running up. We have a little short term AI bubble going on right now.  And then you also have the 1.272 fib where it's pretty much your initial breakout zone and then we'll see resistance. You can see these two days right here perfect resistance off of that. Now the question is, will it continue off of this and maybe, you know, come back down to back test the 100% area or, you know, maybe start filling this gap. Obviously, if you wanted to wait and be a little bit more patient, you could just wait for the gap to get filled, but better risk to reward up here than shorting right when the gap starts filling. Obviously, it comes with a little bit more risk, but you are getting a better price. So NVIDIA might be a further outplay to be honest. I'm not so sure about short term puts here just because it's still holding up structure. Another thing with NVIDIA, you can see this 50 kernel regression line, similar to a moving average, a little bit smoother. It's kind of got similar calculations to a simple moving average, but it's a kernel regression line. So it's kind of like a moving average, but a little bit better. You can see how far it is away from this kernel regression line. Obviously stocks, once they get a little bit overextended over moving average, they start pulling back in for mean regression. You can see the NVIDIA is really overextended over the kernel regression line and it could need a little reset. If we add an info line here, it's literally 24% higher than the kernel regression line right here. And that's just honestly crazy because you can see, I mean, it pulls back into the kernel regression line, bounced right there, pulled back into the kernel regression, bounced their short term, held it up right here after breaking it briefly right here. But overall, it does pull back into the kernel regression and holds it as support. So there could be another kind of technical view on it that it's so overextended over the kernel regression line, which means it's probably pretty overextended over the moving averages as well. You can see the 200 SMA down here, which is, I mean, this thing is just probably 50% plus over maybe even higher than the 200 SMA, which is crazy. Obviously, this is a little bit more of a long term one. And then your 50 kernel regression line is kind of more medium short term. Either way, it's a good support area and stocks do tend to pull back into them and try to hold them up in an uptrend. So you want to do that as another technical piece of info. It's a pretty good one as well. If you pay attention to moving averages or really anything that involves meme regression, you know, stocks coming back down and testing the line. So Nvidia here looking at puts careful in the short term is maybe looking to a longer term trade. Alright, and next we're going into the indexes. So our first one, we're going to go into spy. Last week we had this trend line resistance. So maximum I had us at the trend line resistance. That's as high as like I put us until we broke out of it. You can see Monday or I'm sorry, this was Tuesday. It pulled into the trend line resistance and rejected for two days. So it hit our price target perfectly. I had us up to 422 max or the you know, the trend line resistance. It rejected right off of that for two days, but then eventually, you know, did find support bounce back up debt ceiling got solved on farm payrolls and unemployment tick up. Obviously, the labor data made people a little bit more bullish and was able to break out of the trend line resistance. The only problem is I really didn't feel comfortable of it going any higher than the trend line resistance and stuff because we do have this big one week supply that we're pulling into you have to zoom out to the one week to see it. You can see this huge inflection point right here. This is a one week rally based drop supply zone and it's not a bullish base candle like your standard supplies is actually considered a hidden supply zone because it's a you know, just your standard red, but you still do the same thing. You go from open to high to mark your zone and it's the same thing. It's just not a bullish base candle like your standard supply zones that you'd look for. So normally with supply zones, you're looking for bullish base candles. You know, you're looking for something like this. That's a bullish base candle right here. You're looking for, you know, something like this. That's another bullish base candle. And this one is just a big red.  So, but you do the same thing. You go from open to high, like I said, and it's still a supply zone. It's just considered quote unquote hidden. So spy is pulling into that. Obviously, it would need to get over that in order to go higher. I think this is horrible risk to reward. If you're going to buy calls up here, I mean, I would wait for the breakout, wait for your back test. Once it makes a base and it can show that I can hold up there, that's way better. And that's a little bit more safer. Otherwise, I mean, I would just maybe sit on your hands on this. Obviously, you don't really have a bear signal on the daily. You just have a straight bullish candle here. A signal to go back down. Obviously, you probably need to go back under 420 as a psychological level. If it got back under 420, you know, it could pull back a little bit. You also do have a new demand zone right here. That would probably be my discount area to buy calls at, you know, for a swing. If it was able to pull back into that, I would way rather buy the dip there than buy these breakouts. It's just not for me. And you get way better risk to reward if you wait for it to pull into support or you wait for it to, you know, pull into a demand zone for shorts. Obviously, you have the KDJ positive, so maybe not the best time to get shorts yet, but you do have a real low VIX. So premiums are super cheap. It's very cheap to hedge, but it's not going to cost you an arm and leg on premium. You just do have some upside risk. So when people are not willing to pay more for insurance, obviously your premiums go lower and there's no fear in the market. And the VIX is that basically to your lowest, I think it's the lowest it's been, you know, since like 2020 levels, which is just crazy. I'm not sure if that's, you know, just from the AI hype. I don't know if it's from zero day options, kind of batting down volatility, dampening it. Who knows? As we know, is that it's super low and you do have to be really careful buying when it's so low. Like I said, when the VIX is high, it's time to buy. When the VIX is low, take it slow. So it's kind of relative to the spy because the VIX obviously is connected to the S&P 500. It's based off as SPX options. So you do have to be careful with that. Obviously, we do have a major resistance that I broke over here. It's the same one we've been focused on for weeks, that 418.31. It needed to get over that in order to go higher and also get over the trend line resistance that we looked at last week. So I was able to do both of those. So, you know, this could go a little bit higher just based off of that. But like I said, pulling into the supply, so maybe not the best risk to reward. If you really want to wait for upside, wait for the major breakout or, you know, around 432, but don't buy the breakout, wait for it to get, you know, make a base, wait for solid structure to get made and then you could try to go along there. Otherwise, you know, the supply zone is a little, a little bit risky. You got the VIX super low. So it kind of, you know, it takes the risk to reward away, you know, buying up here. And obviously, that comes with a little bit of opportunity costs.  But we are in a different environment. So we do have a little bit more macro risks. We don't have, you know, 0% interest rates. We don't just have money flying around to everybody like we did in 2020 and 2021. So different environment. Mark is just kind of going up on AI and other tech hype maybe because they finally actually have a product to sell that's new. You know, we're not just going up, going up based off money printing. There's actually a new product being sold that could be good for the future. And you know, people get bullish about that. So that's for the spy. Just be really careful here. I personally wouldn't long here wait for it to get over 432, make a solid base off of that. And then maybe you could try up there. Otherwise, I mean, you don't even have a signal for a short here. I mean, it's just straight bullish candle point and supply. You would need to start getting back down maybe under 420 or so before trying to go short. Obviously, I mean, you could really try up here if you wanted to.  So you don't really, you know, you don't have a reversal signal yet. All right. Now we're going into the QQQ. So this is the weekly chart. We'll go into the daily two. You can see it's breaking over the 61.8 retracement. So I was looking for resistance there was not able to do that hasn't gotten too far ahead of that or above it for me to feel uncomfortable yet. I would need to see a little bit more before I, you know, wanted to close much of my puts. Also, this weekly candle, it's really not the greatest. I mean, you have a really lower shadow week. It's almost like a hanging man or which is potentially bearish. And I'll post a little example of a hanging man just so you can see the candle and kind of just different charts on it showing a reversal. So you do need to see a little bit more. Obviously, your reversal your reversal is confirmed under the weekly low. So we need to get under that weekly low in order to confirm your reversal. And that's going to be at 34651. So you do need to see a little bit more from QQQ before it goes lower. You can see it's just straight uptrend mode. Obviously, KDJ is starting to cross back up. You had a fall signal to the downside here. We did have a two day pull back. I thought maybe, you know, turn around there, but eventually the debt ceiling got resolved and also non-farm payrolls and just overall labor market data was able to scream as higher on Friday. So we do need to see a little bit more from QQQ before I, you know, expecting this to go down. So, you know, I can deal with a little bit more upside risk before closing my July puts. You can see, I mean, it's got a new rally rally based rally demand zone. So I was able to put in that higher high that confirms your demand zone. So I wouldn't need to get under that too. And that just kind of coincides with the 34651 low, which is also the demand zone low and weekly low of that candle. So it doesn't need to get under that way overextended. To be honest, I would not want to buy calls up here. Maybe for day trades, just keep, you know, buying dips. If you see him intraday, that's working pretty good. I'm still doing that intraday on spy and trying to do it on the Vita on Friday too. And it was a little bit weaker, but it looked like a better discount than everything else. And I did get stopped out on that. So obviously not everything's always going to work for a dip buy in this kind of momentum, but it is still working and dips are still being bought. So if you want to keep a short term, still good to buy dips. I personally wouldn't buy calls up here for swings. Just way too ridiculous, way too extended. There's not a lot of reward to the upside. And you can probably have to deal with more dips in order to go higher after a move like this. So it's got to be smart. It's not always wrong to just sit out even if there's, you know, some opportunity cost. But like I said, needs to get under that 346.51 to signal a reversal for the upside. Your next Fibonacci retracement is this 375.66. And that's pretty close to this major resistance here. It was about 372. So that could be the next target over time. I don't think it's going to get up there very quick. It's probably going to need a little pullback consolidation in order to go higher. But, you know, it could eventually hit. I just have to, you know, make a nice structure. Don't get extended too fast. And, you know, it could hit. Otherwise, going to be waiting for that 346.51 we could load to get taken out and that could flush to the downside. So QQ here, just looking a little bit off limits. You know, you don't have a signal for puts yet and also is really not the best risk to reward for call. So maybe just be careful on this one. Next going into IWM. So this one was actually looking way more favorable to me last week. I was expecting it to get back up to 179.76 resistance. It did exactly that. So this was our demand zone that we were looking at last week. Let's see. Looks like Friday closed up with this candle. It did go up a little bit, but then it pulled back for two days. So it did pull back, but it pulled back into demand held up there and it was able to blast higher. So you did have to deal with a little bit of turbulence right here. But either way, it did end up hitting our 179.78 or 179.76 area. And also another long signal this is giving. It's finally over the 200 SMA on the daily. This is the first time it's gotten over that since January of 23. So right at the beginning of the year it was over that very briefly, but then pretty much broke back under and it's been chopping under it ever since. So now you do have that signal over that and also you do have a signal over 179.78 which is the resistance we've been focused on for weeks if not maybe a month or longer. It's just been the same area and I pretty much just been looking for trades within the range and that's about it. But now we're starting to get over that. So we're breaking out of the structure. Yeah, KDGA crossing over to the upside. This is a fresh crossover. So that could be good. It could go a little bit higher here. You don't have any supply till it gets up to here. You got a big supply candle here. So that's your major supply. It's about 190 or so. What is that like a pretty much like a rally based drop area? Maybe like a drop based drop area. If you that's kind of ugly for a drop based drop. But either way, nasty supply candle that led to a huge sale imbalance. So this is your supply area. If we zoom out for Fibonacci retracement you can see I just deleted the one day demand zone and supply zone. I just wanted you to see these Fibonacci areas clearly. You can see it's been holding up to 50 ever since July 2022. So that's kind of been the support. Your next Fib is at 187.63. So it could retrace back up there. And that kind of meets right with the supply we were just looking at at 190s. So maximum I could probably put us about there. Not sure if it'll get up there this week or anything. It's a pretty big bullish candle. So it might need a little pullback or consolidation before trying to go higher. But either way, I showed you on the daily it's breaking over the 200SMA and also it's over your 50 kernel regression. And it's also over your 179.78. So that was a long signal that I was looking for. And you finally did get it. Another thing we're looking at a couple of weeks ago was just this downtrend breakout. So I said this downtrend breakout would be a nice long signal. It ran for a couple of days, ran into resistance and it did pull back. But now finally over that. So looking pretty good. I would say this was the more favorable long just in terms of value and cheapness. It was way lower in the spine QQQ and it did close that way stronger than both. So we did get a broad market rally on Friday and the breadth did look a little bit better. So we had multiple sectors up. We didn't just have tech carrying us. So that could be a good thing for the markets. Another thing with IWM regional banks situation with all those regional banks crashing that did kind of bring it down also and just the financial sector in general. This thing kind of does run with the financials. So you do have to watch those as well. If regional banks and the financial sector start curling up this will probably go higher. And like I said, you do have that supply at the one nineties, one eighties, one eighty nine or so. And then you also have the 38.2 that I showed you on the weekly chart at one eighty seven IWM here looking pretty bullish. And next we're going into the worst indicator ever. Just kidding. It's not the worst indicator ever. It's just it's been having really not that great of signals to be honest. So we finally got under that 1553 which is pretty much what I was looking for in order for the market to go a little bit higher. It was able to do that. Once I got under that, you can see Friday's closed by you know, closed up basically to a new level that we haven't seen in a while. So we really needed that 1553 to get broken in order to go lower. And then I had the 1473 next that I could get down to there. And that's coming from all the way over here back in 21. So you see this 1473. That's what this red line is all the way from 2021. So that's why I had that 1553 the most recent low down to 1473 which is a 2021 low. So that's why that was the price target. Obviously we're slightly under 1473 now. So next area probably just be 14 flat. If I was able to get under that about 1410 there's a little wick low right here from 21. And that's probably about as low as I could put it for right now. I feel like it could start holding up there and try to reverse just because you know it's so low and the cost for insurance is pretty cheap. People might start trying to pick up hedges just because markets looking a little bit frothy but anyway it does have to hold up that 410 in order to curl back up the 2022 to 2023 average close is way up here. So your average close from 2022 to current is about slightly under 24. I don't have the updated numbers for this week. I forgot to plug them in but either way it's probably just about you know 0.10 lowers it's probably about 2380s especially when it's this low it's been dropping about 0.10 every week. So you just assume it's about 2380s or so but either way we're really far away from it but eventually it does like to have a mean regression and come back up to that average or come back up to the 200 SMA or even come up to you know like your 50 moving average or this kernel regression line. So eventually it's going to bounce you just have to wait for that signal and right now a signal to go up for the VIX would be if it reclaims 1553 if it reclaims 1553 that takes you pretty much back up to the 18 is this really no resistance this is just a straight red candle that 1831 which is your two areas right here where you see the arrows that's your pretty much your closest resistance if it gets back over 1553 so it does need to get over that before you know seeing a signal for the markets to start pressing in fear again and 1553 is still mad low like I said every week 20 is the major level you need to get it over 20 you need to close over 20 and that signals fear in the market if it closes over 20 it doesn't need to get over 2133 which is this most recent rejection right here so that's for the VIX does need to hold up the 14s here I got maximum must going down to 410 maybe it would need to break under that for me to even think any lower just because that is a 2021 low or a 2021 wick low so it does need to break that or hold it up though that's for the VIX just wait for the 1553 to get reclaimed if you want to get bearish otherwise watch this 1410 area as a major level from 2021 all right and next we're going into the DXY so really didn't have too much in the dollar last week you can see there's a nice pullback here I think I pulled back about 0.64 percent I'm guessing we had a green day on this day because I mean the market's been reacting when the dollar pulls back the market will go higher and go bullish when it pulls back but it's not even reacting to it moving up really that much to be honest so it's been kind of a strange indicator we're also we've also been going up when bond yields go up which is also strange because 2022 when bond yields in dollar we're going up I mean it's obviously kind of bearish for the market so kind of in new conditions here not sure if those indicators will eventually catch up I feel like they will last week I was saying I feel like we needed to get up to that 105-10 you can see it topped out at 104-71 so it was a little bit short of that area I still feel like if it gets up to the 105s that could spook the markets a little bit I feel like it does need to get a little bit more elevated for it to start reacting or it just needs a harder pullback in order to go you know super bullish but either way you do have a new rejection area right here at 104-70 super short term nothing crazy but as long as it's holding over 103 which is our 2020 COVID peak which is 103 flat that's where you get 103 from as long as it's holding over that I consider this still a little bit elevated and you know that could spook the markets a little bit we'll need to fall back under 103 in my opinion in order to be you know a little bit more bullish but right now I mean the dollar's kind of being ignored so maximum I can put us up you know to that 104-70 and that's really about it that's the most recent rejection area otherwise you know it could maybe pull back into the 103s but there's really not a signal on this right now you can see the KDJs crossing to the downside some momentum did slow a little bit after a nice run-up you can see the KDJ gave a positive signal here had a really great run-up now momentum is starting to slow we'll need to see a little bit more currency volatility maybe that brings some volatility into the markets this big day here down 0.64% and also a pretty big update right here up almost half a percent so anything over like you know half a percent either up or down on the dollar I usually consider that a pretty big move on the dollar and it can you know bring some volatility to the market whether it's upside or downside and with this week's data that we really don't have too much except for Monday I feel like maybe the currencies won't really move too much the reason why we moved so much to this or last week you know is because of the data that we had and also the debt ceiling issues we'll need to see a little bit more data from the dollar I don't really have anything specific here really not at a support and we're really not that close to a resistance either and also the markets are not really following it too much so maybe just need to see a little bit more data but hope you guys enjoyed I'm going to get this chopped up edited and sent out I love you guys make sure you like comment and subscribe to our extra youtube channel and I'm out


There we go, sorry about that. That's okay. Sometimes you got to push all the buttons in a row. Oh, don't even get me started on technology. It's a love-hate relationship. It really is. Kat, I have a hobby where I talk to people. Normally I set up in public places and we talk about things that normally people don't think they can talk about. My only goal is just to help people get a chance to critically think about why they hold a position, particularly something they're really motivated by or something they really believe is true. Is there anything like that for you? Do you have something that you're absolutely sure you're right about? Bernie Sanders. I'm not very good with politics. Would you say that's the most important belief in your life? Right now I think that this upcoming election is more about humanity and it's about, we have an opportunity to make seismic change in this country which is vastly required. I was a supporter of his in the beginning and I'm like back in the game and yeah, it's more, I heard Killer Mike say it beautifully when he said, why does he support Bernie Sanders? And it was because he, of all of the potential candidates running right now, either party, he is the only one who by far manifest those same policies and beliefs and wishes of Martin Luther King. So that's true. Are you saying, could you boil that down to like, I like Bernie Sanders, I'm gonna vote for Bernie Sanders. Yes. Okay, I have no problem if you like that, if you like him, but I'm moving more something absolute, like, you know, like. On a spiritual level? Not on a spiritual level, like I don't mind if you like, like, so I had someone who wanted to talk about Marvel movies and we did a seven hour conversation. Wow. Listing all of them from beginning to end. Because I'm very passionate about Marvel movies. But at the end of the day, it's like, hey, you can like whatever you like. If you like a candidate, you like a candidate. Do you have something that's more absolute? Like, something that says, this is red and now the person says, no, it's not red. Let's do a test to see if it's red or not. I'll say this. Because I agree that you probably really, really like Bruce. Oh my word, I'm like one of the most ardent supporters. You're feeling the burn.  I was in Philadelphia when they protested. So I was one of the protesters outside. Awesome, awesome, awesome. Random kiss? So I saw our future and it was beautiful. Is there something about like politics that you think should exist or shouldn't exist? Something like that, that could be a bit more objective. Like, what's the one thing you want Bernie Sanders to do because you think it's the most important thing possible? Medicare for all. Medicare for all? Yes. That's, okay, okay. So you think we should have Medicare for everybody? Absolutely. I have a Canadian colleague in fact who said, Kat, the first time I ever heard healthcare insurance was in the States. Okay. It's everywhere else, it's called healthcare. Only in America is it referred to as health insurance. Okay. I'm very anti-capitalist society. Why are you for everybody having Medicare? Because that is a right. All of our people, there is no, we want to call ourselves the richest country in the world, which, you know, whatever. I don't like boasting and I don't like, we're the best kind of idea. I think we're all in this together. Okay. But, and I am one of those firm believers in, you know, a rising tide lifts all boats. So how can we possibly, don't wave that superior flag if you can look around and your neighbor is hungry.  Your neighbor, you know, until everybody is loved and cared for and we are at least taking care of the most disenfranchised, the most vulnerable of us until we're caring for each and every single one of those, then we're not doing what we were meant to do, which is be stewards and love one another. Okay. Do you think you'd be for it if you got taxed just a little bit more? Oh, absolutely. You'd be totally fine with that? Would you be fine if everybody got taxed just a little bit more? Yes. In order to afford that? Well, where do our taxes go now? The military industrial complex. We already pay taxes. It's more about us being able to say we want a fair distribution of how our taxes are spent. Okay. The money's there. It's just, it's put into the wrong line item. I see. So you'd want someone to streamline the way how taxes are now. And in the event that they aren't, you'd be totally fine with just a little bit more taxes. Absolutely. So that everybody can maintain a certain level of standard of power. Absolutely.  That's very arrogant. Because what I want to tell anybody and everybody is that your life can change in the blink of an eye. Okay. And I know this to be true because I went through a three year period where I got downsized from my field. I went through a divorce and I was misdiagnosed with two autoimmune diseases. Hugely expensive. Okay? Yeah. I lost my health insurance. I lost that. I almost lost my home. So I can tell you within a year's period of time everything changed, you know? And if you had told me the year before, if you'd said next year, you're gonna go through this, this, this. I would have laughed and said, you don't know what you're talking about. Okay. I'm fine with this. It sounds like you have like, so the way how I manage my conversations is someone says something and if they say something that meets the standard, like you tell me something, I say, okay, where's my, how extraordinary is that claim? Mm-hmm. Is the evidence you're providing me meeting that standard of evidence or like is the extraordinary evidence you're providing the meeting that extraordinary claim? You're saying everyone should have health care and you're willing to pay for it or organize the way that we pay for it in order to make that happen. Yes. Would you make it mandatory for everybody? To have Medicare for all? To have to pay that tax. Oh yeah. Or could people opt out? People pay taxes already. I'm just. But could they opt out specifically the Medicare tax? Like say there's 70, they're already happy with their health insurance. They don't wanna pay extra money to pay for their losses. Well if there's 70, they have Medicare. Okay. So say they're 25. Yeah, say they're 25. Say they're 25 and they're making $250,000 a year and they want to pay for their own top of the line. I just wanna pay it myself, forget it. Let them. They can do it. What they will find is, but they still have to pay into the tax because that's how you have social security. That's how you have everything. It's about social services. It's not about, I'm not alone. I don't have the mindset of what's mine is mine and how much I, because you don't become wealthy by yourself. Okay. You don't. Okay. Other people contribute to your wealth. So just make sure if they wanted to opt out, they could, but they'd pay taxes in some indirect way back into the system. Yeah, they'd have to pay taxes. Okay, but they could check some boxes and say, hey, I don't wanna give money to that, but eventually the money's gonna get to them, to the system. Anyway, is that what you're saying? No, I'm saying that if they wanna decide to pay for their own top of the line that they imagine that they will have way better coverage, blah, blah, blah. Let them pay for that. But your taxes need to go to our schools. They need to go to all those things. Yes, schools. Social services. That's a specific Medicare thing I hear you talking about. No, that's part of it. That's what I'm saying. This is what I'm bringing up. Yes. Let me be clear. Yes. I'm thinking of it as like car insurance. Everyone who's on the road should have car insurance, but there's some people who just choose not to. Would you make it a law that everybody has to have the health insurance? And there is a law. Hypothetically. You have to. Hypothetically. About this Medicare system that doesn't exist yet. Would you make it such that everybody has to pay starting at a certain age? Yes. Okay. No way to opt out of it? No. It's for the society. It's for the greater good. Okay. And we have to stop.   We've got to get rid of all this competition that it's like I got to beat everybody else so that I can be at the top. Because what they're finding is that that is not a sustainable economy. It is not a sustainable socio-economic belief system. It, that's why you're seeing such the disparity now with the top, top, top down here. And what's happening is we don't have, when you look at people who pay taxes, what's going on right now is the top percent are paying the least amount. Okay? So we don't have a middle class anymore. When you raise taxes on the top percent, let me explain something to you. So you've got people over here that are paying the majority of the taxes. Us guys, we are. And we are quality of life. We're suffering. Most people are living paycheck to paycheck. There's not a lot of discretionary income left over. You've got these people up here paying the least amount of taxes and they're sitting on this big stack of money. Okay? Because that's really all that means. They just have more of a stack to sit on. You tax them more. What happens is they're not sitting on such a high stack. But their quality of life does not change. Let me go something out. Is it a flat tax for everybody that's going to be paying into this? I don't know. I don't know. I think that's a fair answer. Yes, I don't know. There has to be a restructure of the tax system and I'm not knowledgeable enough to tell you what that should be or what that looks like. I don't have that information on me. But it's got to be a more fair tax structure. You know what I feel about certain things is if I don't have enough information to come to a decision, I'm fine with I don't know as the right answer until I get better information to come to a better understanding. Yes. Here's something I want to throw out. Going back to Bernie Sanders. If it turned out, this isn't the case because I know what his platform is. But if it turned out, he's not going to focus on Medicare for this term. He's going to do everything else and he says but he can't do Medicare. And some of the candidates said they could do the Medicare overhaul. And that's what they're really going to focus on. Would that in any way reduce your confidence that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate for this? It's hard for me to even fathom that because he's been talking Medicare for all for 40 years. We're talking about a hypothetical situation. I'm just wondering like, is this? I am, oh, oh. Is this the cornerstone of why you like Bernie Sanders? Would that reduce any chance if he says I actually can't do that? But here's all these other things I'm going to do. It would have to be a whole, I'd have to look at all the policies and I'd have to look at all the individuals and I would have to look at their history of how they have voted and what they have supported. You have two Democratic candidates. One can do Medicare. The other one's Bernie Sanders and you cannot. Would that reduce your appeal? Would that reduce his appeal at all? The way you're using what I'm asking that is if it didn't reduce his appeal at all, maybe that's not the reason why you like Bernie Sanders very much. But if it did reduce your appeal, then you can say, yeah, that's a very important thing for me and I'm hoping Bernie Sanders does that. Yeah, it would reduce my appeal. Okay. Because I just turned 60 years old in November. Same here. Yeah. Black doesn't crack. I know. I have noticed. Sooner or later, I'm just going to go all gray hair. Yeah, but you still will be smooth. Oh, I appreciate it. Oh, it's going to be like, you know. Oh, you don't know the women I meet. And they're like, the women of color and they're like older than I am.  She must be like 45. No, she's older than I am. Oh, wow. That's not fair. All right, so I'm glad I can stay young until 45 after that in my mind. What was I saying? So you said Medicare is in fact really the cornerstone of why you are attracted to the platform for Bernie Sanders.   I lost my husband. Okay. I have no healthcare. I'm a college educated woman. I ran departments. I was an executive director of a nonprofit. And here I am at this age with no healthcare insurance. And I also, it's like, once you are downsized, I have learned this, that now they're saying 40 plus. If you are downsized from your field at 40 plus, which I was downsized at 55, you will never be rehired. Or the chances of you being rehired in your field at the same monetary level and all that dramatically reduced. Wow. I couldn't buy an interview. Took me two years. I had five interviews in two years. And then they, in each interview, they've hired somebody younger. Yep. And cheaper. Yep. So there you have it. Yeah. So here's what I'm gonna say. So I can say, from my perspective, a bit of a grab on my end, but like I'm, I got a PhD, Georgia Tech. I've done nothing but laboratory work for a long period of time. And when you are ready to transition to another job, it's hard because the hiring practices are, well, we could hire a PhD, but we could get someone at a lower degree for at the same cost, lower price, and just train them up. So that they're good in that one capacity that we need them for. Yeah. You know, it's like, so you tend to be overqualified for a lot of roles anyway. Oh my word. I lucked out in the position I'm at right now, but it's one of the situations where I'm like, shouldn't be this hard. You shouldn't be this hard. And every year there's a new wave of PhDs in the market, bright-eyed, ready to invest in a company, so.  I mentioned you don't like a capital of society. What's the alternative that you would prefer? Democratic socialist. Yeah, I get it. I get it. I'm more about, I'm, big government doesn't scare me. You just want people to look out for each other. One another, yes. A humanistic point of view. Humanistic point of view. But not to the point where there are some people who, for example, work really hard for their money, like work really hard for it, have it, maybe have a family and just want to give them that money and like, hey, I work for this, I should be able to do whatever I want with it. Right, right, right. Government knocks on the door and says, hey, we got some new tax initiatives, we're gonna take some of this money. It's like, no, this is mine, I work for it, this is my family, I'm gonna give it to them. You stay out of my business. Well, I'll tell you this though. As a parent, you do your children a great disservice by leaving them a ton of money. It is wrong. What you do is that you are feeding the narcissistic, elitist, entitled human being. So if that's what you want to put on this plan. If that's what you want to do with your money, you should be able to do it, don't you think? Like, hey, it's my kid. Yeah, except that we all suffer. Look at who's in the Oval Office, you know? The reason, here's the train of thought that I have is like, if it's mine, even if it's gonna affect, like I'm not responsible for whatever another person does. I'm not responsible for the actions of another person. Some guy decides to rob a bank. I don't go to jail for that, he does.  But if he decides to do something good with it, maybe that's a good thing. But I'm not responsible either way. And it's my money, I should do whatever. What I'm saying is, you know, whatever if you have, just that that's taxed appropriately. Okay.  I don't even know what that is. It's a bunch.  Cause you know, that means he's really gonna be able to handle it.  But tax it appropriately. So that, you know, there is a, I think, I can't remember. Put it in like a hedge fund that can be like, reciprocated into the government. And you'll always have that amount, but at least give it as a pay into the city, blah blah blah. But at least you're paying a fair share of taxes. I think there's a reasonable aspect to what you're saying. I'm trying to wonder what would convince you if you're wrong. This is the last question I asked. I'm not saying you are wrong, but what would make you wake up and be like, let me just look into this policy again. Oh, maybe these numbers don't quite add. Maybe- I don't even know if that's possible. I'm not even saying like you're, it's a 100% turn. I'm just saying, actually be better if we did this. Oh. Keep this foundation, but maybe just tweak it here and now it's perfect. Look at this guy. No, I'd be open to that. Yeah. I'd be open to that. One of the things that, you know- What would that look like? What would that look like? I don't know. But what I will tell you is that I'm the kind, I am one of the most ardent, vocal- Okay. Believers and whatever I believe in. Okay. So I'm gonna be the one that goes, blah blah blah blah, you know. However, if you give me a good argument or you go, hey cat, you know, but what about this? I'm not one of those that's so focused and laser focused that I'm not listening to anybody else. Okay. You share with me something because not every person can know everything. Sure, yeah.  Yeah. I didn't know about Medicare for all forever and ever. You know, I mean, how about, how would I become where I am now and have the beliefs I have now is because I listened. Okay. Because I learned. I love this because normally when I talk to people, they say they're absolutely 100% confident about the thing they believe. That's just never gonna change their mind. But I find that to be a fairly dangerous position to be in. Yes, always. Because when you're not willing to change your mind, you have to put these blinders on that can just blindside you or people that you love or make you unempathetic to other people's positions or make you close-minded really. Yes. How would you grade your confidence in Medicare for everyone from a scale from zero to 100% being there's no way I can be wrong about this, 0% being the same thing on the other side. I would say 100%, there's no way I can be wrong on this unless somebody comes forward with a brand new thing I've never heard of that is a far better system. Okay. Right now it is by far the best system that I can think of. It's universal healthcare. There's nothing wrong with saying 100%. Okay. Though I could imagine someone who's even more confident than you and saying I don't care if someone comes to me with a good argument or not, I'll never change my mind. And I would say that person's more convinced or more confident than you are. Well, okay, then say 90. Okay, okay. I want to go in there. So may I say one final thing? Yes, you may. I've been through such challenges over the last five years that it's been crazy. And what I ended up doing is I went to Puerto Rico and volunteered and I'm now going back. So in April I'm leaving for Puerto Rico again. And they just had a hurricane over there, right? Oh yeah, Maria. I think I left my hat. We're in the second year of recovery. It's horrible what's gone on there. But anyway, what I learned through all this because you gotta pay attention. You can't just whine about everything. And you can't wanna jump off the bridge every day. Sure. So this is something that I noticed. It's like, how did I get through this and what did I learn? And one of the things, it's like, whatever knocks you down, heal from that. Do everything that you can do to heal and then serve. That's what I found has worked for me. With Puerto Rico, it's like heal and serve. And that's the pathway to happiness. Okay, healing and serving, pathway to happiness. I've got a very long way to go. I really appreciate it. Thank you so much. Did you enjoy this chat? Thank you. Thank you. Oh, sure, what happened? Thank you. You're welcome. Have a good one. Good luck to you. Thank you. I appreciate it. Have a good one. You wanna take a card? I got one. Okay, okay, cool. Well, she was fascinating, so you can take a card.


I'm here at the Rocket League World Championships and I have one simple question. Can you get a scholarship for play at eSports? I've been looking around for people for collegiate eSports like eSports players from college and I found a few people who I think can help us out. Hi, my name is Alex Phipps or I go by laser. I am the coach and manager for UCF Rocket League and we finished top eight at CRL Worlds this past year. I basically make sure that they show up to scrims, I schedule their matches, make sure that they get their prize payouts, basically it's everything to do with running the team and coaching them in between games. I think our club currently has seven titles, League, Rainbow Six, we have an Overwatch team, a CSGO team and we're reintroducing Smash and Fortnite this year. And so are there scholarship opportunities due for UCF students? No, actually, we are a completely student-run program. Oh, Big Miss! Alright, so UCF didn't work out, alright, they don't have any scholarships but I think I got another lead. I'm gonna talk to some guys from this place called Carroll University near Milwaukee, Wisconsin, I guess they said around there. Sounds like a small college, I'm not getting my hopes up but maybe, maybe they got some scholarships up, maybe they got like a cool eSports program, let's check it out. My name is Jacob, I am the team captain at Carroll University for Rocket League. Currently I've been ranking around GC2, around GC3 area. This season will be the first season that we'll be able to play in CRL which is an upper rank that most players don't ever get to qualify in.  Mainly for Rocket League, I did play Siege back then. We played like all across the U.S. We played against some West teams, some East teams for our conference, some scholarship opportunities you can get there as you do get the opportunity to earn a small scholarship. Earn a small scholarship. Yes, finally, alright, we found something. So there are small eSports scholarships over there at Carroll. Now the next question is like, can we get something bigger? And I met Seth, he's the manager of the University of North Texas team. I've been trying to get in touch with UNT for a long time for a bunch of other stuff. So finally found somebody from there. And they're a huge program, I think we might have hit the gold mine here. So let's talk to Seth and figure out what's up. Hi, my name is Seth Dunham, also known as Oat Kicker online. I am the UNT Rocket League manager. For UNT Rocket League, I help find them scrims, help schedule their games and stuff like that. I really keep them on track of their game and stuff like that. That way they just have to focus on school and their game and that's all. The team's doing really well. We've made it top three in summer series right now, headed into playoffs right after this week. So the rest of the eSports scene is pretty interesting. We have two other teams in Overwatch and League. We do offer scholarship opportunities for all three teams. So if people are interested in joining, go through the trial process and stuff like that. And if they make it on a team, then they're eligible for that. To student athlete, all you have to do for the scholarship pricing is to be part of the starting roster. All right, people, so there you have it. It is possible to get sports scholarships as an eSports player in college. But then the bigger question I guess is, how do you get on a team? Like, what do you gotta do next? If you're interested seriously in becoming a collegiate eSports player and getting those scholarships and playing for a team, what do you gotta do? I asked everybody that we've already talked to to tell me a little bit more about that and also to share a little bit about what they think the future is for eSports. Like, is this just something that's hot right now? Or is this gonna be the future of college athletics? We hold open tryouts for all UCF students for each semester. Mostly fall is our biggest hitter. And basically if you come into UCF, anyone can come in tryouts and we go through a tryout selection and eventually come out with the teams. I really think that at least in Rocky League, this is gonna be the next proving grounds for pro play. I think that a lot of up and coming pro players are eventually gonna get picked up and poached by universities with scholarship programs.  If you are wanting to go to college for eSports, it was a fun, I had a blast while doing it. I would say try to make a name for yourself, try to find references, look at multiple colleges. Some do give scholarships, try to get your name out there and you'll get somewhere. eSports in general just skyrocketed so much that eSports is going to be the next phase of like, I don't even know how to explain it. It's more job opportunities. I mean, there's so much stuff you can do with eSports, not being a player, but video production, getting the scenery done, making videos. I mean, there's so much you can do. At the collegiate level, I think eSports, at least at UNT is gonna continue to progress because I know that we're building a new facility. I think that it's gonna continue to progress. In terms of Rocket League, CRL is continuing to get bigger and bigger with the introduction of Worlds, I think that really helps us. And as far as other collegiate games, I think those are gonna continue to grow just like Rocket League is. All right, so something else they've been telling me about that I think is pretty interesting is that there's actually a whole organization dedicated to college eSports. It's called the National Association of Collegiate eSports, N-A-C-E, NACE, NASE, I don't know how you wanna say it. They're like the NCAA for college eSports. NCAA does it actually regulate eSports. They kind of missed a huge opportunity and so now you can check out NACE and you can enroll there and maybe find other scholarship opportunities for Rocket League do. They've got connections to some of the biggest players like Northwood and Oakland and UCF and other places like that too. So you might be able to get scholarship through them too. Check out NACE if you really are interested in college eSports. This has been an absolutely awesome experience. I would totally recommend eSports events in person to anybody on the planet. Definitely come check one of these out if you ever get the chance. I wanna say again, thank you for watching this all the way to the end. If you guys want some more info on how to apply for these scholarships or like to try to get on these teams, you can hit us up at proposcore.com and we'll try to put you in touch with some of these universities that we've talked to and other ones that we're always in contact with.  I know how much you love Rocket League. I know how you've followed this channel. You've been a long time fan and this one's for you, baby. So thank you for watching. I'll see you next week. Don't take restores to doubt. Roll to yourself. Just keep pushing and you will get there.


I'm going to put you on there right now, right? Don't let me drown See you guys, welcome back to my channel. If you're new here, hi, hello, my name is Lydia, and I'm going to help videos here on YouTube, pretty much every single day. Today, I thought I'd go for my medication routine just because you've been asking, so these are my night medications. I take a lot. Well, you even get into this. I am on a lot of medications. I keep on medications in this box here. I've been taking these Slimming Aid tablets. They're from Milko, and they've been helping me feel less bingey. These are not prescribed. Obviously, if you're struggling with a eating disorder or a weight loss, go to the doctor first. Then we have Quick Tire Pian at 100 milligrams. I have one of them every night. Then we have Venmavaxi, and I'm just going to use the last one in this set-up. I usually use the PO pack ones. Tire Pian at 25 milligrams. I have one of these with them 100 at night. That's the kind of make me sleepy, and then I have 25 in the morning. I have a lot of meds that I take, guys. This isn't simple. Then one's done. So then we move on to Trazadeva, which is a 15 milligram capsule. It helps me get off to sleep at night. I've run out of the Azzapan, but usually I'd have the Azzapan as well. I've run out, so I'm just going to have a twin Azzapan tablet instead, rather than the Azzapan because I've run out. I've run out of something I've run out of. Today, because I've had a pretty bad day, I'm going to add 25 milligrams of Promethazine, which is an over-the-counter medication. Then I'm going to add the Lavraz. Do I have any open packs for the Azzapan? So I'm going to have 2 milligrams of Lavrazapan, and then I'm going to get the Zopi Clona. These are only 3.75 of tablets, so I'm going to have two of these tonight. I can have one to two tablets. I just really want to sleep tonight, so I'm having to think that's it. So that's puttypine, Trazadone, Renovaxine, Clonazepam, Lavrazapan, weightless tablet. My anxiety is quite bad. I could add a Panenol. I have the Panenol to prove. All right, I only have a tape that might need me to take it, just because it makes me very paranoid. This is less than what I was on in hospital though. I was on a lot more. I was on a lot more than Azzapan, and I normally have Bayazapan, which I take regularly just because it keeps my anxiety at a reasonable level. If you watch my two most recent videos, you'll know that my anxiety has been a bit out of control. I'm getting it back in control now. I have sorted out a new accommodation. I'm going to start, which takes long to kick in. So the puttypine takes the longer. So I'll take that first. Nazapam and Lavrazapan. So I'm going to have them now. And those are my evening meds. So that's the evening tea I have with my evening meds. My morning meds I only have. In the morning I only have Renovaxine and 24 of puttypine. Here we are. So yeah, see you guys in the morning. Morning guys, continuing on from last night where I just got my medication. I ended up having to have end of the tablet in the wrong seconds to sleep. I woke up that hour ago and I'm having my medication now. So this is my morning medication, which is 25 milligrams of puttypine. Yeah, you take what you can to feel as well as you can. But these all help me a lot. So this is today's outfit. Jacket and leggings. Leggings on the top if you're on top shop. And this is Primark, I do believe. Anyway, let's go out. I'm not wearing any makeup today. Oh, what's the eyeliner on?


A common theme on the show lately is about how the right is becoming increasingly violent in their rhetoric. And we're getting to the point where a lot of them are just saying the quiet part loud. We saw this when a bunch of right-wingers reacted to Ted Cruz denouncing Uganda's anti-gay law. They were saying, no, Uganda's based. We want that here in the United States. They're just, they're saying it lately. Ian Miles Chong or Miles Ian Chong. I always swap them, fill in the blank. That dude, you know who I'm talking about? He responded to someone who made an anti-Semitic tweet and he said, Jews aren't the problem.  So they're just increasingly feeling really bold and they're coming out and just saying it. So I want to look at a couple of videos here where you have right-wingers just saying what I'd assume many, if not most, right-wingers are thinking. So this is America First activist Tyler Russell. And America First, by the way, like when we see this, this is basically code for Nazi-like. And I don't think that that's hyperbole. But he explains what the far-right white nationalist base really wants. So let's go ahead and listen. I may need to refresh the video since Ellen broke Twitter, but what he says here is not surprising if you've been paying attention, but hopefully the normies will see this and wake up. It's libertarian populist people that are like, we need to actually have political substance. You know what?  Okay, I don't care about your political substance. Wait, is he Canadian because he just said a boat? Let me go back. If this is a Canadian speaking about America First, I'm going to be very angry. People that are like, we need to actually have political substance. You know what?  He's Canadian. A boat. You just out of yourself. Are you larping as an American? Possibly. I don't know. There's a lot of Canadians. Stephen Crowder, others. But not all Canadians can be like Lance or David Dole. Some Canadians are... are shitty. I don't care about your political substance. I want a Trump Reich. I want a Trump Reich.  That's what I want. We don't want freedom. We want a total Trumpy and right, okay? That's what we want. We want a total Trumpy and right. We want dictator Trump. We want Trump to rule forever and ever and make America great again. And we want all these people who are acting in bad faith who are traitors to this nation to go to jail. That's what we want. All of these dissents... Okay. A Trump Reich. I mean, he said it, but somebody in the chat also said he's Canadian. Let me fact check that really quick here, because I am curious now. I'm just gonna Google his name and a Canadian. This motherfucker is a Canadian. Canada first exposed months inside one of Canada's biggest, youngest and newest white supremacist chat rooms. Tyler L. Russell is ripping off Nick Fuentes with the aim of securing a white ethno-state in Canada. He's recruiting an army of nameless, faceless kids to do it. And now this motherfucker comes to America and says, no, I want a Trump Reich here. I'm sorry, we need to lock down our northern border, okay? Build a wall. I love Canadians, okay? You're all amazing. But the ones that move to the United States, it's like the worst. Because the smart Canadians know to stay in Canada because that's where the free healthcare is.  Fuckin' Trump Reich.  Now, he's not alone, though, because Newsmax guests also said something, woke capitalism taking over America. Listen, if all these conservatives are so outraged about woke capitalism, I think the only solution is to abolish capitalism. Let's have the worker seize the means of production. I just said protection. Workers seize the means of production. And that's it, no more woke, right? If workers can control these companies, if they have a democratic vote and they overthrow the boards, they take over the means, you solve the problem. They wouldn't say that because they don't know what capitalism or socialism is, but let's listen to this guest here. I predicted 20 years ago champion for America's borders.    Okay, this is where you can tell they just don't know what to talk about. They are making up things to be outraged about.  Who's thinking about this? Who wants to do that? Who wants to desecrate graves?  I mean, I personally, again, I'm not thinking about woke corporations or what I'm outraged by. I just want to spend time playing Tears of the Kingdom. I want to hang out with my dog. I want to finish Carnival Row. Two episodes left. It's pretty good. I mean, it is bizarre. It's so weird. Who's going to stop them, Carl? Carl, I've had enough. I've had enough. I'm an old man, but I'll tell you something. I'm willing to pick up bombs. I can't take it anymore. Well, I'm... I see your frustration. I mean, look, you want to mess with the headstones of Arlington National Cemetery? Are there people doing this? And by the way, I thought that this was the guest, but apparently this is the guest. I haven't pre-watched this. It's like, all these people, they do this stuff in schools. They're, oh, we're going to trend your kids without your stuff. What? Just... Oh, we're going to trend your kids.  All of a sudden, three o'clock hits, the boy comes home with a wig on and a dress. Kid was trans, completely permanent. God, this is happening more and more. It's crazy. Hear me out, Michael. What happens if we started going around as conservatives, start baptizing people in elementary school without parental consent? People would lose their mind. Why not do it? Yeah, because you can't do that. That's illegal. That would violate the First Amendment. I mean, you could do that at private schools, but it would be very weird. And actually, this was done, right? There was a school that did, like, a mass baptism, and the parents complained because they didn't get permission. And it wasn't necessary. It was like a Christian school, to be clear. And the parents weren't mad that their kids were baptized. They were mad that they were baptized, and they weren't there to watch it. But, you know, there's one instance. Let me Google what he's talking about. Arlington Cemetery. Bishop Baron expresses outrage over desecration at Catholic Cemetery. This is from 2022. Let me see what the story is here. Okay, so, yeah.   No. I think it's a heart, actually. Yeah, it's a heart, okay. And a happy face. Or is this Mary? No. I actually don't know. No, this is Jesus. Anyways, let me see. So, Christian, hateful obscene graffiti on Halloween night. He assured his prayers for families. So, I mean, this is the only thing that I could see from 2022. But when you see this, do you automatically assume that the left did it? I mean, this is probably like some teenager that did it. I just don't, I don't know why you would blame the left for this and make it seem as if this is some widespread problem. Oh, it is white Jesus, okay. It is Jesus. Oh, and they also spray-painted his face blue. Satan. Oh, they spray-painted Satan. And they spray-painted his toes. Yeah. So, I guess, I mean, maybe that's what they're angry about, but is this like a widespread phenomenon? Like, again, they are making up a reason to be outraged.  I want to take up arms. I want to be violent. Ugh. They're working themselves into such a frenzy that they're becoming increasingly violent. It's just so unhinged. But I mean, this is the right. This is what they do now. So, you know, you can expect their rhetoric to get even more violent, especially in the lead-up to the 2024 election. And it's only going to get worse. You can hope that if they get wiped out, because they've gone too far in 2024, that that's going to be the wake-up call. It won't be the wake-up call after the 2012 election. They did this whole election or campaign autopsy and they were like, yeah, you know, we're just, we need to appeal more to diverse crowds. And then they elected Trump the next election cycle. So, like, they're incapable of introspection and they're just going to double, triple, and quadruple down.


An archaeological dig in Germany is proving to be one of the greatest digs ever undertaken anywhere in the world and we're going to tell you guys why. The archaeological site in question has previously revealed hunting spears dating to 300,000 years ago. Saved through tiger remains and now, now it has just revealed a massive elephant with incredible 8-foot tusks that roamed these parts of Europe 300,000 years ago. The same period the hunting spears have carbon dated to. Isn't this astonishing? We are told in no uncertain terms that human ancestors had reached Europe by this time although it would take at least another 250,000 years for modern humans to arrive. These early people may have been in the area at this time because their lineage was first established in the continent 100,000 years before the elephant's death according to the Natural History Museum with early fossils found in Swasi, Kent and Spain. These early settlers were capable of making stone tools and able to build and use these tools and wooden spears to hunt for food which seemingly placed human activity to 400,000 years ago in this area. The massive elephant which was larger than today's African elephant stood an estimated 12-foot tall and weighed 10 tons according to archaeologists from the University of Tubingen who also identified it as a female and said it was an older individual due to its warrant teeth. A complete lower jaw, large bones from three of the four legs, numerous vertebrae, ribs and all five delicate hyoid bones from the animal's neck were also recovered from the remains. It is thought the elephant died due to old age rather than human hunting although the researchers have not completely discounted this with head of the excavation, Jordy Sangili, saying that although human ancestors were accomplished hunters there was no reason for them to go after such large and dangerous prey. Straight tusk elephants were a part of their environment and the hominins knew that they frequently died on the lakeshore, he said. The stone age hunters probably cut meat, tendons and fat from the carcass before carrying as much as they could from much smaller animals but we do not seek to rule out that extremely dangerous elephant hunts may have taken place with larger groups of hunters but the evidence often leaves us in some doubt and mostly in the dark with bite marks left on the elephant's bones simply betraying the presence of scavengers. Ancient human tools at the site suggest sharpening took place and archaeologist Barbara Alvarez found micro flakes embedded in two long bones and was able to refit two small flakes into grooves confirming this. Tracks from a small herd of adults and youngsters have been found less than 350 feet from the remains lending weight to the view other elephants were in the area. One of the researchers from the University of Rome who analyzed the marks said that the heavy animals were walking in parallel by the lakeshore when their feet sank into the mud leaving behind circular tracks with a maximum diameter of about 23 inches. When the elephant was alive evidence from sediments suggest the climate was very much like it is today but with a wealth of animals similar to the Serengeti as opposed to the life that doesn't exist in these parts of Europe anymore this is a window into the past and the possible influence our kind may have had on the behavior of life here on the earth. The lakeshores were populated by at least 20 large mammals including lions, bears, sabertooth cats, rhinoceroses, wild horses, deer and large cow with many exquisite finds having been made at this major archaeological site in Germany previously and currently which provide clues as to the environment at the time and evolution and de-evolution of human activity and the influence our kind has had as well as what may be stopping us in our tracks as history unfolds but what do you guys think about this anyway? Comments below and as always thank you for watching