Hi everyone, Sean with jaspyscasebrakes.com here doing on release day 2020 tops chrome baseball jumbo number eight case break number two pick your teams Where not only are we breaking an entire case of jumbo tops chrome at the end of it We're also going to be giving away $250 to anybody that had two plus teams are going to be in the randomizer Where top five names at the end if you had two plus teams in the break Have a possibility to get $50 and break credit each so top five names at the end We're gonna go ahead and found to figure that out at the end of the break, but in the meantime Here is our break So we've got Here's a list everybody that's got On top of that you can see pack four here. These are spots that were given away in a one-pack break So Debra close with the Rockies Mike Krasinski with the angels mark bracket with the Phillies Kevin Crouch with the Cardinals and And ace Luke with the Mets Good luck everyone Here's a fresh case for us. You can see You know head rip this open leave the boxes in the back and get started veteran base cards do not ship veteran base parallels like refractors Obviously colored numbered colors stuff like that those all will ship so other than that one pack that we just did we've got a This will be my first boxes Awesome stuff very excited to get into this. I hope I can make everybody happy here If I can't make everybody happy, I hope I make the major Those two want to go first so we'll go left You guys can see the rest of the boxes right back there. You can also see on the Nick cam here boom Ray we actually sell the base In store and all proceeds actually go to charity So last year. I know we did like greater la For like kids and stuff like that. I don't know if they picked the charity that they're gonna do it for this year but yeah, we saw all the veteran base in store afterwards like at a at like Like specific shows and stuff like that that we do so last year. I think we did like a great Yeah, LA boys girls club To do like a after-school programs and stuff like that Well, Dan just by buying into the brakes You technically are donating because whatever teams you have on these or if it's random teams, whatever teams you get, you know You get a random all of that base from those go up for sale and inadvertently you are donating so Every single person this break is contributing to those charity Kyle Lewis base rookie Seattle Mariners Mark Bessette Gavin Luxe Los Angeles Dodgers Onyx Figueroa a figaroa and the what is it negative refractor Aristides Aristides Aquino Cincinnati Reds Eric Ainge Very nice So like we said base base Cards will not ship.  Oh and then for all those that are in the Watching this on replay. There will be a recap at the end. Aristides Aquino 35th anniversary refractor very nice Cincinnati Reds Eric Ainge rookie reproduction relic Justin Verlander For the Detroit Tigers, that's going to Luke Smith And that is numbered 44 out of 99 Kyle Lewis freshman flash Seattle Mariners Mark Passette Mike trout Prism very nice Los Angeles Angels Mike Krasinski with the spot he won in that one pack number four Brendan Rodgers future stars Jose El Tuve green That's numbered 41 out of 99 Houston Astros and Jay Remington Kyle Lewis 35th anniversary refractor Seattle Mariners Mark Passette Third auto Jordan Yamamoto for the Miami Marlins Base auto there that's going to Charles Bern Boba Shet base rookie Toronto Blue Jays Onyx Figueroa Ramon Loreano future stars Oakland Athletics that's going to I Coppola Dylan Cease freshman flash Chicago White Sox Matthew Shara Luis Robert base rookie Chicago White Sox Matthew Shara congrats I think somebody earlier said that those base cards are going for like 50 bucks a piece right now Brian Reynolds future star sandy co-facts die-cut refractor Christian Yelich 35th anniversary refractor JL is Joe Dan. That's the guy who was here earlier breaking. That's who had called me and helped out with the camera The man the myth the legend junior Fernandez rookie auto for the St. Louis Cardinals and Kevin Crouch with the spot he won in that one-pack number four. That's numbered five of 150 Congrats Kevin AJ Puck 35th anniversary refractor Oakland Athletics I Coppola and fifth auto Nick Solak rookie auto for the Texas Rangers Charles Bern Base auto there congrats Charles Jordan Alvarez rookie Houston Astros going to Jay Remington Joe Jaspie is is good at everything. It's true guys He's good at everything He actually sometimes he'll mess up just so people think that he has flaws. He doesn't Anytime he messes up on stream. It's on purpose He's impervious to mistakes His one flaw is that he's too humble It's all of this. Oh, and that he's a Dodgers fan That's the true one Comic Hunter your Dodgers win when it doesn't matter My angels just don't win very nice first box these things are loaded Not to pick some up for myself At least Dodgers always look good guys. Come on. We know this. There's no surprise. They always look good and then Oliver it's not you It's the Dodgers. Don't be one Second box. Good luck everyone. It's not true There hasn't been cheating for 31 years No, not at all Gabe. It was it was a very soft box Yeah, well, I'm not gonna be looking at that But if anybody sees a short print by all means let me know But I'm not gonna be turning around the cards and looking at the variations. The brakes are gonna take long enough See there you go When we sort through them at the end we'll look for those Houston cheated comics, but Houston didn't just cheated me into you guys. You know that, right? They cheated their way to the to the finals or to the the World Series They cheated all the way there So they cheated, you know if they didn't cheat who knows what actually would have happened As far as who would have gotten the World Series against you guys and everything else as well Well, yeah, everybody has a right to be heated, but I mean think about it They cheated against everybody on the way there. So Washington Nationals They didn't cheat against you guys Right, but Dan, we're also talking about us. You know what I mean? like if Like Mike trout said if Mike trout knew what was coming every pitch like can you imagine how good that guy would be? knowing what was coming in every single pitch Tony Eschelman Rookie Otto for the Baltimore Orioles mark knows the no Celeski Junior Fernandez Rookie Otto purple for the St. Louis Cardinals That's going to Kevin Crouch the spot he won in that one-pack break and that's numbered out of 250 Congrats Kevin Yordle on Alvarez 35th anniversary Sorry refractor go into the Houston Astros J. Remington. Congratulations Gavin Lux freshman flash refractor Los Angeles Dodgers Onyx Figaro Alex Rodriguez die-cut refractor Chris Bryant 35th anniversary Anthony Rizzo blue Number to 150 for the Chicago pubs and Josh proofs Brendan McKay 35th anniversary refractor Tampa Bay rays go into Eric, Ange Aristotis Aquino freshman flash refractor going to the Cincinnati Reds and Eric and Otto Logan Webb San Francisco Giants base Otto I Coppola one Soto 35th anniversary refractor Fourth Otto Brock Burke for the Texas Rangers Rookie Otto Texas Rangers is Charles Berner. Congrats Charles Bobechette base going to the Toronto Blue Jays and Onyx Figaroa Babe Ruth refractor die-cut Ronald Acuna Jr. 35th anniversary refractor Should have one more auto in this stack and there it is Abraham Toro rookie Otto base for the Houston Astros J. Remington Congrats I feel like I've said your name a bunch already so far Sam Hilliard refractor Aristotis Aquino base rookie Cincinnati Reds Eric, Ange Cavendizio future stars Oscar Mercado green for the Cleveland Indians to 99 That's going to Mark Passette. That's box number two Yeah, I mean honestly guys like as much as I make fun of the Dodgers and stuff I do think it's shitty that the commissioner did nothing to punish the Astros as an angels fan and then being in the ALS it's an absolute joke and The fact that they did nothing with the abundance of proof is a absolute Travesty But whatever It's done with I don't think anybody other than Astros fans will ever actually take legitimately. They're that world series Nobody will actually ever consider Legit World Series. It'll be like the Like Pete Rose, you know what I mean the hits and stuff like that like they'll have an asterix next to it Just like bonds McQuire so on so forth. It is what it is. I mean, they've got the trophy They've got the rings everybody else knows what happened And I don't think anybody ever let them live it down Historians don't don't forget shit, but it is a weird question Do you think if they would have stripped them of the World Series and They would have gone to the team that like like the Dodgers Do you think the Dodgers would have taken the if they said okay? Well, since you know, they beat you in the World Series blah, blah, blah Here's your here's your World Series Because another similar situation like that in LA was Reggie Bush and When they took away his When they took away his his husband, they went to Vince Young and asked him and Vince Young said no And I kind of respect that a lot. You know what I mean? Like I always I always kind of hated Vince Young because he beat SC but when When they took it away from him I think somebody bought it damn somebody bought the the trophy and then I think gave it to him You know what I mean? But he never like on the record. I still he's not a he wasn't a husband trophy winner that year. I believe and He just he had to be like banned from like unit USC and being associated with them for like a decade As part of his punishment and that literally ran out ran out like a couple months ago I'll tell you this right now. I probably be I'd probably be more mad If it's like let's say instead of the Dodgers in the World Series. It was the Padres like If it was the Padres, I'd probably be more mad, but since it was the Dodgers and kind of like yeah, it sucks but That's the thing Dan you'd get in more trouble. You get in more trouble with Throwing rocks because of them cheating then they got in trouble for cheating. It's just dumb Good luck everyone freshman flash Seattle Mariners Kyle Lewis Going to Mark Passette Brendan McKay base rookie Sam Hilliard blue rookie auto That's numbered 69 out of 150. That's going to Colorado Rockies and Debra Close the spot she won in that one-pack break Kyle Lewis rookie refractor Seattle Mariners Mark Passette and right behind that Kyle Lewis 35th anniversary refractor Go into Mark Passette as well. I see right here rookie auto for the LA Dodgers Tony Gonsolin And that's going to LA Dodgers and Onyx Figueroa. Congrats Onyx Dylan Cease rookie hyper White Sox go into Matthew Chirac Kyle Lewis base rookie Seattle Mariners are hitting a lot Mark Passette. Congrats Nico Warner rookie refractor 35th anniversary Chicago Cubs Josh Proust Gavin Lux base rookie LA Dodgers Onyx Figueroa Rogelio Armenteros rookie auto for the Houston Astros Once again, Jay Remington. Congrats Boba Shet base rookie Toronto blue days Onyx Figueroa. God am I watching wrestling right now?  That's a rookie refractor auto So that's numbered out of 499 263 of 499 And that's going to Los Angeles Angels and Mike Krasinski the spot he won in that one pack break Brenda McKay freshman flash refractor Tampa Bay Rays Eric Ainge Mike trout die-cut refractor Los Angeles Angels Going to Mike Krasinski Aristides Aquino base rookie Cincinnati Reds Eric Ainge adbert alzalee prism hyper whatever that is Cubs Josh Proust Luis Robert base rookie Chicago White Sox Matthew Chirac. Oh, we got a superfracture. Oh And it looks like it's a 35th anniversary. Let's hope it's a good name. Oh my god Mike trout 35th anniversary superfractor Los Angeles Angels Mike Krasinski The spot he won in a one-pack break LA Angels Mike Krasinski Lost it Mike trout superfractor Whoo, he won that spot in a one-pack break giveaway Holy hell as an Angels fan. This is awesome. Congrats Mike Thursday night pull my first Mike trout auto Or Wednesday night Friday night pull Mike trout superfractor Holy hell Well, I think that'll make the recap and another angel show you a tiny 35th anniversary refractor I mean refractors just don't mean anything when you pull super fractors guess right Does it have does it say one-of-one if it's just a super factor? I Don't think it does does it I think it's just a known thing. Oh It does Mike trout one-of-one There's Joe's a Joe's a train Mike trout follows me guys Mike trout follows me the it went to Mike Krasinski Sergio, I'll do it at the recap at the end Mike was out ski Mike Krasinski Somebody said that what I was saying you're not your name the other night all they could think of was Monsters Inc. The movie You have an awesome name and now you have an awesome card to go with it So I don't think I can turn change the wrestling if If I'm gonna keep hitting Mike trout super fractors and stuff. What do you mean Sergio what pack? We pulled it out of the tops chrome jumbo pack How do you get the spot? He won it in a top Joe jumbo one-pack break filler With five different teams given away So not too bad. So anybody that was searched that was chasing that The Mike trout super fractors. There's one one less available courtesy of me All from Mike. I mean technically it did come on Saturday, right? It's just after midnight for us Anybody have any idea what that might might be worth? Box for everybody freshman flash a j puck a j puck refractor behind that Auto Jordan Yamamoto blue for the Miami Marlins number to 150 Miami Marlins. That's going to Charles Burn Boba Shet base rookie Toronto Blue Jays Onyx Figueroa and right on top here Aristotus Aquino base rookie Cincinnati Reds Going to Eric Hange an auto Jonathan Hernandez rookie for the Texas Rangers. That's gonna be going to Charles Burn. Congrats Eloy Jimenez future stars Johnny Bench die cut Matt Chapman purple for the Oakland A's number to 299. That's going to I Coppola AJ puck 35th anniversary refractor Oakland A's I Coppola Anthony K. Rookie Auto for the Toronto Blue Jays. That's going to Onyx Figueroa. Congrats Onyx Kyle Lewis base rookie Seattle Mariners Mark Bessette Rookie Auto Refractor Tom Eshelman Baltimore Orioles. That's going to Mark Nozoleski Number to 499 Congrats Mark Mike trout 35th anniversary refractor to go with that super frack that we got earlier Los Angeles Angels Mike Krasinski Gavin Lux base rookie for the Los Angeles Dodgers and Onyx Figueroa and Freshman Flash Dustin May refractor for the Dodgers also going on it's Ladgro junior future stars Alec Rodriguez die cuts Kyle Lewis, I think it's like the second or third of these. We've already hit out of four boxes 35th anniversary refractor Seattle Mariners Mark Bessette. Congratulations He's crushing it and so are you James Marvel rookie auto for the Pittsburgh Pirates going to Chris Miller Congratulations Trey Turner Whatever that's called negative refractor Washington Nationals Oliver Soria. There you go Oliver. I Think those cards are amazing looking. It's one of my favorite like types of parallels that they have or whatever It's called isn't there a show called Ed Nolly or something like that? Wrestling is so cool Joe you've been doing the recap just in the regular video, right? Yeah, it's up. I I don't know anything about that I'm sure I'm assuming they're working out. They've gotten in contact with you or something Okay, I mean I would I would suggest that go through On the Jatsby's case break site down the bottom. There's a little support button Send a send an email on there to see if they can update it being that it's the weekend Obviously, I don't know if they'll be able to give you an update, you know tomorrow or so, but I would say go through that support button on there But I don't know the details or anything like that Yeah, like Joe saying sorry about that I mean if I had any more information or knew it exactly like specifics about it Obviously, I'd like to be able to update you or give you any information Brock Burke rookie auto for the Texas Rangers going to Charles Byrne Congrats Charles Seth Brown rookie auto Gold for the Oakland A's That's numbered out of 50 15 out of 50 for the Oakland A's and I cupola Congrats Yordle on Alvarez freshman flash Refractor Houston Astros that's going to Jay Remington Nico Horner hyper for the Chicago Cubs Josh Proust Boba Shet 35th anniversary refractor Toronto Blue Jays Onyx Figueroa and Boba Shet base also going on its figure. Oh Tom Eschelman auto Baltimore Orioles going to mark no as well ski Congrats mark Bobby Bradley hyper rookie Cleveland Indians mark the set Sean Murphy rookie blue for the Oakland Athletics to 75 That's going to I cupola nice little box here for the A's Yeah, at least three Eschelman autos, right? nice rookie reproduction for the New York Yankees Jared Corfage Labor Torres relic green. That's numbered out of 99 30 out of 99 Alex Young hyper for the a diamond backs Diamond backs is going to Josh Proust Dylan Cease rookie auto Chicago White Sox going to Matthew Sharoff Congrats Matt Justin Dunn rookie auto Seattle Mariners Mark Passette Abraham Toro hyper Houston Astros Jay Remington Louise Robert base rookie Chicago White Sox Matthew Sharoff Victor Robles future stars Babe Ruth die cat Oscar Mercado and Peter Lonzo refractors Louis Robert freshman flash Refractor Chicago White Sox Matthew Sharoff and right behind it. Louise Robert base refractor Chicago White Sox Matthew Sharoff Congrats, man. Very nice yard on Alvarez base rookie Houston Astros Jay Remington John means blue That's numbered out of 150 for the Baltimore Orioles and Mark knows a lesky Dustin May rookie refractor and Nico Horner 35th anniversary refractor Dustin May going to Onyx Figueroa the Nico Horner going to Josh Proust in the Cubs Nice those box number five Yeah, like the base. I think you're going for like 50 bucks a piece Joe refractors 100 150 raw I mean, we've probably hit three or three or four of the base already We just hit that freshman freshman whatever Refractor and then the other refractor too. So That's up pretty quickly We just passed the halfway point. That was only five boxes. No, I feel like his I feel like his his His regular tops series two is still like it's still up there though, isn't it? Except the base from top series two is still high Like the chrome's definitely not going to go lower than that, you know Are we sure hasn't sold out already? Yeah, I'm you know, I don't know why Gabe, but I feel like I'm also I Feel like I'm also not like I'm surprised every every time like I go late That like there's still that many people up with me like three in the morning or whatever But then I'm like, oh, it's the East Coast and it's six in the morning So people are getting up and drink their coffee. It's still kind of shocking Buster posing for about Hall of Fame. Yes Jarell next break. I'll check out after this Next break is going to be It's a one-pack break that's going to fill up hobby number four for tops chrome also So it's a tops chrome one-pack break and then a tops chrome hobby full-case break and then after that is gold standard number eight and then another hobby or jumbo Pops chrome So Jarell, I know you I think you got last spot in that gold standard break It's gonna be a little while If you don't make it, I don't blame you the video will be up first for you in the morning whenever you wake up There you go, man Spend your Saturday morning with me. I know Teddy's busy. He's over on Instagram doing personal, but I Don't know if he's got room still if anybody wants to get any more personal I don't know how late he's going tonight because he's coming back tomorrow. Obviously. I'm off tomorrow. So I can go until You know till Nick till Joe or Joe gets here at 1 o'clock tomorrow. I can go until then First auto Logan Allen for the Cleveland Indians rookie auto and that's going to mark Passette Danny Mendic. I think this is such an incredible autograph by the way Love that Danny Mendic rookie auto refractor Chicago White Sox Matthew Chara number to $4.99 and then Aristides Aquino rookie refractor Cincinnati Reds Eric Ainge. Whoo and Louise Robert 35th anniversary refractor right behind that Chicago White Sox Matthew Chara It's turning out to be a hell of a box already I feel like something special is coming out in here, right? Can you imagine that all being in one pack? That was the one pack you got out of a hobby box crazy I feel like that'd make a lot of people happy Vlad Guerrero future stars Ichiro die cut Corey seager and Jesus Lizardo Thorkelson's pretty crazy Jake Rogers rookie auto for the Detroit Tigers and Luke Smith congratulations Luke I love baseball, but I hate it too because it just hurts my heart so much Heart of ki-boom future stars Jeff samarja blue To 75 going to the San Francisco Giants and I capola Gavin Lux 35th anniversary refractor Los Angeles Dodgers Onyx Figueroa AJ puck freshman flash Albert Puhl's hyper or whatever that's called. I'm gonna keep calling it hyper until tell me somebody tells me what the actual parallel is Robelle Garcia rookie refractor auto For the Chicago Cubs and Josh Proust number to 4.99. Congrats Josh Boba shit 35th anniversary refractor Toronto Blue Jays Onyx Figueroa and then right behind that boba shut base also going to Onyx Figueroa Panini calls it hyper tops calls it prism with an S So it is called prism So it's a tops chrome prism Joe Palumbo rookie auto for the Texas Rangers and Charles Byrne Brustar Gratterall rookie refractor Dodgers Onyx Figueroa That's a cool picture there Ramon Loreano. Isn't he a rookie? Ramon Loreano is a rookie everybody, right? Why is that not have a rookie logo on it? Oh, he was rookie last year. Okay. Nevermind Okay, but I it looked like okay. I guess he had more more at bats I'm just getting in my head Eloy Jimenez future stars Nolan Ryan die cut more Jean was the Altuve Nico Horner freshman flash Travis Demerit That's an awesome-looking card the negative refractor Detroit Tigers going to Luke Smith You know what? I might try to do that. I might try to collect the whole the whole set of that negative I wonder how much the Robertson cost me. I should buy that now We do like Disneyland You know, I want to go to the bubble. I want to watch basketball in the bubble Gaspies should do a travel series It's called bed breakfast and breaks I volunteer I'll uh, I'll get a camper We'll put Jasper's logo on the side I'll drive the country stay in different bed and breakfasts And do reviews And then do breaks from those bed and breakfasts With the the guest breakers will be like the the people that that run the bed and breakfast Over 1200 annuities and summarize the rates and benefits of annuities from financially strong insurers Again, that's annuity dues and don'ts for baby boomers and a free annuity rate report both absolutely free We're rolling a new any gentle today Supplies are limited Jesus Tanoko Rookie auto for the Colorado Rockies and Debra Close Congrats Debra Ramon Loreano Negative refractor Oakland A's Going to iCopola Gavin Lux rookie refractor la Dodgers That's going to Onyx Figueroa Mike Trout 35th anniversary refractor la angels Mike Krasinski Tyler Alexander rookie auto for the Detroit Tigers That's going to Luke Smith Domingo Leyva rookie auto for the Arizona Diamondbacks Josh Proust and Freshman flash Gavin Lux refractor La Dodgers Onyx Figueroa Jake Rogers prism rookie Aristides Aquino 35th anniversary refractor Cincinnati that's going to Eric Ainge So Issam Diaz is a rookie his other cards don't have rookie labeled on them guys That's what I was looking at Freshman flash does have a rookie label, but the other ones don't Jordan Alvarez rookie refractor Houston Astros J Remington Dan. We're still on jumbo number two We've got like one box after this Sorry, that was bothering me So Issam Diaz base card does not have a rookie logo on it Because we also had that parallel too See Oh that one does I guess it's right next to his foot. That's weird No, yeah, it is it's right next to his foot. It's so hard to see on that I'm losing it guys. Sorry Yeah, you can't I can barely see it because of his uh cleat Jordan Alvarez. That's a short print too Short print refractor for Jordan Houston Astros J Remington And Danny Jensen negative refractor Toronto Blue Jays Onyx Figueroa Kyle Lewis base rookie Seattle Mariners Mark Bassett Gavin Lux base rookie Dodgers Onyx Figueroa Artie Steades Aquino Freshman flash refractor Cincinnati Reds Eric Ainge Logan Allen rookie auto purple For the Cleveland Indians That's numbered out of 250 That's going to Mark Bassett. Congrats Jake Fraley rookie auto for the Seattle Mariners going to Mark Bassett Congrats Bobechet base rookie for the Toronto Blue Jays and Onyx Figueroa Good luck everybody last box And recap coming up at the end Yeah, Dan other than that you can also check like uh, they probably have that same card that's Like higher numbered than out of four So like the next one up maybe he's out of 20 or something like that, right? You can always check and see if What the price is for the raw out of 20s and see what the difference is for graded out of 20s if they have any Or a different parallel you can use that kind of that multiplier for to see So instead because obviously if it's out of four, there's probably not many more on the market at all But you can use that Yeah, I wouldn't I mean don't expect to see another out of four out of there You know what? I mean you have one of them. So you've got a quarter of the market already But use that same idea for like the out of 20 or the out of 50 of a card That you have that way you can see What like if the regular bull if the regular card is whatever And then you know if the multiplier if it's graded if it adds 20 30 50 percent or whatever The better the patch stand I think the more the more, you know Collectible it is. I feel like if it was for jerry duty I feel like if it was like an alabama patch Like it actually had the alabama logo You know then that might be even more Because like the rose bull patches and stuff are always very cool But if it's got like the team logo or the team like insignia, I feel like those ones are the really really big ones But like the patch is cool because it kind of shows you what game that was from You know so like sugar bowl.  See and double check that it says game used in because sometimes they might it might say Uh player worn or event worn which in that case maybe it was used for like, um You know, I like to do the media sessions and stuff like that So it might not be exactly game worn It might be player worn from one of the media sessions like the jersey They wore during the media session instead of specifically the game. So you got to check that too That sometimes happens And by sometimes I mean it's pretty common Luis robert base rookie chicago white socks Matthew shiroch andres muñoz For the Padres nice picture there gold rookie auto to 50 30 out of 50 San Diego Padres. That's going to spiro voloscos balasacos jordan alvarez freshman flash houston astros going to j remington gavin lux 35th anniversary refractor going to los angeles dodgers and onyx figaroa Congrats onyx Also a very cool name to say Luis robert freshman flash refractor chicago white socks Matthew shiro Congrats those things will add up Seth brown rookie negative refractor oakland a's That's for icapola And louis robert 35th anniversary refractor chicago white socks Matthew shiro Austin nola rookie auto for the seattle mariners mark beset. Congrats mark bobechette base rookie toronto blue jays onyx figaroa randia res arena Rookie refractor auto for the st. louis cardinals and kevin crouch the spot he won in that one packed filler Number 253 of two four four ninety nine. Congrats kevin Hey susa lasardo 35th anniversary refractor oakland a's That's going to icapola Kyle louis base rookie seattle mariners mark beset Hunter harvey Rookie auto baltimore orioles mark no seleski Jordan alvarez base rookie houston astros j remington Gavin luxe base rookie dodge er dodgers onyx figaroa Last stack i think there should be one more auto potentially Good luck everyone Sam hillyard rookie auto for the colorado rockies That's going to Debra close spot. She won in that one-pack filler tony gonsolin Blue rookie for the la dodgers nice color matching there 41 of 75 Ellie dodgers onyx And that's the break guys Congrats everyone. Give me a second We'll do the giveaway for the credit And then we'll do the recap Yeah, the college jersey stuff tends to go down in value No matter what but It does help if it's like a team like alabama clemson, ohio state because Even if those players end up not doing anything in the pros Ohio state fans are ohio state fans no matter what you know what I mean Cool. So now time to give away some credit guys Good luck to everybody that's in part of that Okay, so here is the list Of everybody that got into this break. So we're going to look for anybody that has two spots And we're going to move them over to a separate category So charles you got two spots.   We'll be getting $50 in credit. So one two three four five six seven eight nine ten Ten people so half this list will be get credit. Okay. Good luck So you can see everybody on there one spot Dice roll to see how many times we're gonna randomize it four to two six times one two three four five And six in final time. Good luck Oliver charles mark ben and chris. Congratulations You guys all get $50 in break credit and then here is a recap so At the 120 minute mark So recap for everybody These five people here are getting $50 in break credit. Congratulations to chris miller ben screen only mark basette Charles burn and oliver soria and now to a recap of the hits Overall very nice break guys Some very nice stuff in here Lots of silver lots of refractors yordan alvarez Short print refractor Lots of louis robert, which is a good thing lots of boba shut yordan Some beautiful stuff here guys Our dealerships I mean lots of teams had very good breaks here guys Those negative refractors incredible looking I think all the uh higher end teams definitely did really well Here's our autos Lots of autos The refractors are out of 499. We had a couple of gold autos, which are out of 50 purples are out of 250 We didn't have any autos from the top end rookies, but I mean You can see gold autos that's brown there blue autos yorman yagamoto And then I mean awesome break But hands down best card of the break Mike trout one of one superfractor Congrats that went to uh Mike grizzinski With the one-pack filler to sell out this uh sell out the break Congrats Mike and guys that was The 2020 toms chrome baseball jumbo eight box case break pick your team number two I'm shone with jaspix case breaks dot com and we'll see you next time


Okay, great. All right, well thank you, Mayne, and everyone for the opportunity to present here today. So the majority of my presentation here is about a body of work that we actually investigated and wrote a paper about around two years ago. And it's focusing more at the data level. So a little deeper down about how to work with data effectively and interoperably and make it in the quality of the access and experience for users. And then at the end of this talk, I'll talk about where we're at now and about how we're trying to extend that model to some additional things. So, and I should also note right now that this has been a very big group effort with many of my colleagues at the NCI. It's the brainchild of Ben Evans and Jingbo Wang, who's on maternity leave at the moment. We did a great job in getting our paper actually written and submitted that Mayne and I shared with this announcement today. All right, so just a little bit of background about NCI for those of you who aren't as familiar. So we're a national computational infrastructure here in Australia. So a big part of our focus is traditional kind of HPC usage, but we also are a data repository. So we have, and these slides are now about two years old. So at the time, 10 plus petabytes and that's even bigger at the moment. And we also span a very big range of domains in terms of the data we host here. So we have a very large part that's climate, coast, oceans, but we also span into geophysics, astronomy, bioinformatics, et cetera. So a lot of the approaches and best practices that we try to share with our users really have to be broad enough to cover this full domain. And this kind of relates, I think, to one of the questions that came up from the earlier talk. So this is really forefront in our minds when we try to put together an approach. And the big takeaway is that we really, we want to maximize that usage and experience of our users and ensure that they really have a seamless way to get to the data. And that really all comes back to this quality factor. And our users are looking to do things, like combine data, visualize, and they really would like this to be as easy as possible. So again, this comes back to some of our, what are these motivating goals? And we want value, it's a lot of work to manage data and metadata as I'm sure everyone here has some experience with. And so you put all that effort into that management and you'd like at the end of the day to have that sort of positive feedback and result from all of that hard work. All right, so also just a little bit about where we're at. So our collections are accessed in several different ways. So again, this comes back to how we have to put together an approach that works for traditional direct access on a file system, so local users up in the repository. We have web and data services served through a lot of our cloud facilities and data portals as well as virtual laboratories. So all of these things have to be considered when we talk about and think about our approach for what our quality standards are. And then if it wasn't complicated enough, then when we come back and look at this really wide range of domains that we host here in terms of the data, each domain has some complicated factors that have to be considered. We have many gridded data sets, but we also have a lot of non-gridded, different coordinate reference projections, resolutions, all of these things actually become a really important part of the picture when we start to put together some of these standards that we require. So now I'll go into what this data quality strategy looks like and it's modeled off of this out of maturity approach from Shelley Solid AGU. So this is what kind of motivated the work for us. And we took that and thought, okay, how can we apply that to the data that we host here? And so this is just a very simple schematic of kind of the big components for us. We have an underlying high performance data format that we have to consider. So, and this might change, but we wanna choose something that's flexible and robust enough to be ready for HPC use, but then also through these other usages that I mentioned earlier, like through cloud services and portals and virtual labs. We have to work closely with the data custodians and providers of the data. So planning, deciding about how the data will be accessed, what's needed for that particular collection. Then we work through data quality control. So we try to make sure we're consistent with any recognized community standards. That's our big one. And make sure that we're compliant with that. And then for us, we wanna make sure that anything we serve through our facility actually works across our platforms and tools and services. So this is the big kind of final check for us. If we deliver data, we wanna make sure that it's useful and not breaking. So I'll just speak a little to each of these points. So we started by looking at our climate, ocean and weather data. It's a very large part of our collection. And so two years ago, these were some kind of rough numbers to give you a sense of how many petabytes of data we're talking about in these domains. So we started there. They traditionally use a format called NetCDF. So that was our go-to, let's start there. That'll be the model that we begin with. So that's our underlying high performance data format. This is a pretty famous slide of this from a few years ago that I'm using here, our book is referred to as the National Environmental Research Data Interoperability Platform. But the main thing I'm just gonna simplify here, the takeaway is sort of these levels of different things that the complexities that build up from choices you make at an underlying data format layer, what's required in terms of API layers that have to work with it. Likewise, what type of conventions have to then work with below. And then you get into services and tools. And then finally, that's when, if you make some choices on these bottom layers appropriately, the hope is that, okay, now the user, communities, tools and services and portals, et cetera, then fit with that model. So these, we try to put together checks that address these different levels on this figure. Working with the collaborators, with custodians and managers, of course, that's a big part. And then we get to our compliance. And for the NetCDF collection, there's a community of some very useful standards that already exist out there. So this is, we chose, okay, let's jump on this and extend checkers that we can use in our workflow. And these consist of something called the climate and forecast convention. So we use that as sort of our big checker of the data contents within the file and then some additional ones for more traditional metadata. And then of course at the higher level with catalog collection, catalog records, we have the ISO standards. So you can see there's a few different levels of standards to also consider when you get down into that actual data file. And then this was just a little figure of some of the, when we did a bit of a survey of all our holdings at that time before we started this body of work, we realized that there was a big spread, even if we just focused in on climate data using that CDF, we noticed there was a big spread in the conventions used by the community. So even there, even though there were strong community standards, it wasn't heavily adopted. So this was another motivating factor for us to try and put that into our workflow and put it as a best practice to try and ensure that those publishing with us followed some of these standards. And also to try and get that num column down as small as we could, would be a big pride. And so I think I've spoken enough on these ones, I'll move along. Like I said, we took these standards, we extended different checker scripts and routines that we could adopt at sort of a repository scale. So there was some modifications needed which went into the work we did. And then reporting was something that was really important for us because we wanted to share the output of these checkers or any of the quality information we were looking at, we wanted to then summarize this in a way for our data provider so that it was easy to go and make suggested changes, but then also to be a reference so that they saw that value in the improvements that they would gain from putting that work to make corrections. So we put a little bit of time into thinking about how the reporting would look for us. And then this is a slide on just one of our collections that we worked closely with back at that time. And you can just see this chart here just going a few months at a time, we saw really quick improvements as we went through this process for the community. It was actually a geophysics community in that climate. And so we tried to take what we could from a climate example that was quick for them. And we saw this really nice improvement in quality in their case. And so lastly, in this model here that I just wanted to talk about was this assurance through demonstrated tests across all our tool and services. And this part was really valuable because it was testing that usability across everything that we hosted. So what did we do? We checked commonly used libraries. So a lot of the core system level libraries that were important across a lot of the climate and earth system domain fields. Then we were also testing any of the services that we were sharing this data through. So making sure that things like threads and at the time, hyrax or geo server all worked with the format, validation with different programming tools, Python, et cetera, those were really important for users and visualization. So this is just a few of the big categories. So we had a matrix of all these tests and we wanna make sure that anything we published met any of the appropriate tools for that collection. And so again, we put a little bit of work into how we would share that with our providers. And we learned a lot through this process too. It not only did it give a positive experience for users, you know that they could expect, okay, yes, our data will work with the range of tools. But it also really helped us, we learned a lot through this process as well. And the bonus that I'd just like to throw in here is that we have a lot of feedback to provide to different local and international communities because we did learn a lot. The functionality test led to lots of reference and training material for our user community. So by that, we were able to, as we put together the tests, it naturally led to the development of material that we could use and build in our library. And of course, you know, the real benefit is having something that is really interoperable and follows community standards where possible, which I think really plays back to this quality issue. So what's next or what's been going on? So we have, you know, we have a very large amount of data here. Obviously not everything's a net CDF. So the goal is to also extend this to other formats that we host. You know, so at the moment, we're putting in work into what the process would look like for geotip collections. You know, staying connected and working with international communities. And then a big one right now is extending this framework to now look at that higher level up. So data management plans and metadata catalog records. So how can we start to look at that information for all of our collections and take a similar approach? And I think that's my last slide. Yeah, so thanks so much. And if there's any questions later when there's time, happy to answer them.


A woman who came to the polling station to vote in the presidential election in Moscow, the capital of Russia, poured brilliant green into the ballot box along with the ballot. The woman was immediately detained and a criminal case was opened against her under Article 141 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. He faces a prison sentence of three to five years. An old woman made a fire in another district in Moscow. She was detained and a criminal case was opened against him under the same article. Also, in Voronezh, Rostov and other provinces, cases of brilliant green being poured into ballot boxes were recorded. A criminal case was opened against all those who committed the incident under Article 141 of the Criminal Code. Medvedev announced the dire conditions of the Russian Peace Formula for Ukraine. Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev has laid out the details of the so-called Russian Peace Formula, which would require the capitulation of Ukraine, payment of all due compensations to Russia and adoption of an act on the reunification of the former territories of Ukraine with the Russian Federation in return for Russia ending hostilities. Medvedev stated that to achieve so-called consensus with the international community, Ukraine must declare complete and unconditional surrender, conduct demilitarization, dismiss all constitutional authorities and immediately hold elections for a temporary parliament. He also claimed that Western countries recognize the Kiev political regime as a Nazi junta and that there was a need to conduct a forced denazification programme encompassing all authorities under United Nations supervision. In addition, the provisional parliament of Ukraine will have to adopt a law establishing a procedure for compensation for damage caused to regions of Russia as well as injured citizens and families of dead Russians. In addition, one of the conditions of peace in Ukraine will be the loss of its global legal personality and a ban on joining military alliances without the consent of the Russian Federation. Medvedev also proposed that Ukraine admit defeat in the conflict and surrender unconditionally. The final points of this formula imply the recognition of the entire territory of Ukraine as the territory of Russia and the adoption of the Act of reunification with the Russian Federation as well as the recognition of this Act at the United Nations. This could be Russia's mild peace formula. It's a compromise, right? I think that based on it we can seek a benevolent consensus with the international community including the Anglo-Saxon world to conduct productive summits counting on the mutual understanding of our close friends, the Western partners, he finally stated.


bacteria can produce complex steroids such as cholesterol, which is essential for eukaryotic physiology. This ability was previously thought to be limited to eukaryotes, but recent research suggests that it may have evolved independently in both domains. The marine mysobacterium enhygromaxosalina was shown to produce cholesterol, and its genome revealed a pathway for its synthesis that is similar to the one used by eukaryotes. However, the bacterium uses different enzymes than those found in eukaryotes, indicating that this process evolved separately in each domain. Furthermore, the cyanobacterium calythrix sp. Mies 4105 was also found to possess the same enzyme, suggesting that this ability may be more widespread among bacteria. These findings suggest that sterile biosynthesis is much more complex than previously believed, with the potential to be shared across multiple domains.


If you've been following this channel, you probably have noticed that I mostly use Canon cameras, and I have no particular brand allegiance to Canon, but when you have as many Canon EF lenses and accessories as I do, it makes the most sense to keep going with the same camera system, whether that's Canon or Nikon or Sony. However, at times I have been tempted to switch, I even bought a Nikon D800 for astrophotography, and for a while I used that. Before I got the Canon ESRA, at which point I sold it. And Nikon cameras are preferred by many astrophotographers over Canon, as their cameras, especially the recent ones, tend to have sensors that are lower noise and more ISO invariant than Canon. The actual reason behind this is because Nikon switched over to using Sony sensors, and Canon still does all their sensor design in-house, and they're just behind Sony in terms of absolute performance of their sensors. By the way, most of the popular CMOS astronomy cameras from ZWO, QHY, etc. also use these same Sony sensors that are in the Nikon DSLR and both the Sony and Nikon mirrorless cameras. But something I've always wondered is how much does using Canon, which has the slightly noisier sensors, really matter when it comes to our final results as astrophotographers? Because you usually just see the two camps, someone who shoots only Canon, someone who shoots only Nikon, and they argue. But we know that sensor noise is only one thing that impacts the kinds of results you can expect. So what I'm going to explore in this video, and I did a few real-world tests to actually figure this out, is if I keep all the other factors the same, same telescope, same night sky, same settings, can we see a difference between Canon and Nikon? And a quick note before we dig into this comparison, I received this full spectrum Nikon D5300 from Night Sky Camera, who were interested in letting me use this camera for the channel however I wished. And Night Sky Camera is an awesome business out of Vancouver in Canada, and they sell pre-modified Canon and Nikon DSLRs, or they can also modify your DSLR if it's one of the ones that they work on. And this particular Nikon D5300 is a full spectrum mod, so it can be used for infrared photography with an IR pass filter, and they also change the positioning of the sensor so that autofocus should still work. I don't have any Nikon lenses to test that, but I do believe them. And so it's a very cool camera. I've had a blast using it. And let's dig in. First, let's look a little bit at the features in this Nikon D5300 compared to your typical Canon DSLR. And I'll be using a modded Canon 60D as my comparator here. It's a bit older, but it's a popular choice to have modded in the Canon world just like the D5300 is a very popular choice for mods for Nikon. And this is going to be a short section because they're really mostly well matched when it comes to features that would be important to an astrophotographer. Both these models have fully articulating screens that you can fold away or more importantly point up, which is huge when pointing up at the night sky and needing to see the screen. And they both have a nice live view option for focusing and star hopping and things like that. On the Canon, you press the Q button to access the quick menu items. And on the Nikon, it's the I button. And that lets you change things like ISO, shooting mode, and those kinds of things quickly. The main difference, and it's definitely a point for Nikon, is the Nikon menu has an internal interval shooting mode in the menu. And this is often called an internal intervalometer. From what I could tell, it doesn't completely replace the need for an external intervalometer because I can only set the interval, not the bulb timing. So it would only work for doing a sequence of shots if I limited the exposure time to 30 seconds. If I wanted to do, for instance, a sequence of three minute exposures, I'd still have to use an external intervalometer or a computer to control the camera. So it is a plus for the Nikon because especially with fast lens based shooting, I'm often just doing 30 second sub exposures. Now outside of the features of the cameras themselves, another thing worth looking at is accessories that you might want to buy to go with the camera. And in terms of software support, they both seem to have plenty of options in terms of connecting to a PC and running them from software to control the exposures and things like that. They also both have intervalometer ports and plenty of options there. For lenses, both again have plenty of options and Sigma makes the art series lenses for both Nikon F and Canon EF. So you have some of the best lenses out there for astrophotography available for both camera systems. The one big difference in accessory support is clip-in filters. There are so many more for the Canon APS-C bodies, which all have this same internal structure that accepts this clip-in filter quite easily. It's much more difficult though for Nikon and the only ones, the only clip-in filters that I can find for this D5300 are the STC optical filters out of Hong Kong. So it's not that they don't exist, but you just don't have nearly as many options for clip-ins as you would with Canon. To prepare for this showdown, I took a look at Bill Claff's Photons to Photos website and the input-referred read noise chart gives you a pretty good idea of what we call the ISO and variance of these two cameras. So I'm just going to pick the 60D and the Nikon D5300 here to compare and you can see that the Nikon has a much flatter curve, meaning using it for long exposures at lower ISO like 400 or even 200 shouldn't pose no significant problems in terms of read noise hit. While with the Canon 60D, I wouldn't advise using it below something like ISO 1600 for stacked deep sky imaging. And the reason you might want to use lower ISO and longer exposures is to increase the potential for dynamic range in your image. So you could retain good star color in the bright highlights while bringing out the very faint detail like dusty objects and things like that. So dynamic range is typically decreased as you increase ISO because the full well capacity at each photo site is diminished. Now interestingly, the Canon and Nikon cameras seem to converge in terms of read noise right at ISO 3200, which is already an ISO I use a lot for deep sky imaging. So that will be an interesting comparison between the two. The other interesting comparison is for longer exposures at a much lower ISO. So for that I picked ISO 400 because the read noise is almost doubled for the Canon versus the Nikon at ISO 400. Okay and on to the main event here, which is direct comparisons. These were taken on the same night with the same lens, which was the Ascar 200 millimeter astro camera lens at f4 from a Bordel 4 sky with no moonlight. I'm using my standard testing subject here, which is the North America Nebula. And the first thing we're going to look at is just single 30 second exposures straight from camera. I did just the only thing I did here was an auto stretch of each image and lined them up with registration so that we could do direct comparisons. So we have, I'm going to go through a number of comparisons here. The Canon is always going to be on the left and the Nikon is always going to be on the right. And again, this is a single 30 second exposure. This gives you an idea of what it looks like zoomed out. But now let's do some zoom ins because that's where we're going to really see any differences in noise if there are any. And remember this is at ISO 3200 where according to that website photons to photos, the read noise is about the same on these two cameras. And I think I do see a little bit more noise on the Canon. It just looks a little grainier. And then where there is pops of color, the color is a little bit more intense than here in single 30 second Nikon. So I'd say it's visually it's pretty close, but the Canon definitely has just a little bit more noise visually in a single 30 second exposure without calibration. Okay, let's next look at that same single 30 second exposure but now calibrated with bias flats and darks. And again, here's what it looks like zoomed out. Now let's zoom in again. It's really just sort of a different quality of noise, I guess in a sense, but I do think that I see a little bit of banding already even in a single 30 second exposure with the Canon. Well, on the Nikon, the noise looks more random and distributed evenly. Well, I can see a little bit of sort of pattern in the Canon, which looks like it could pose an issue. Okay, but the proof is going to be in the stacked results. So here is 18 30 second exposures stacked Canon on the left Nikon on the right. And these both look pretty good. You can see that there's some color differences, but these are different mods. The Canon is an HA mod. The Nikon is a full spectrum bear sensor. So there's some differences there. Let's zoom in again. And you know, stacked, I'm seeing much less difference between the two in terms of the noise. You know, the probably the Nikon maybe just edges out the the Canon, but I'm seeing really about the same level of detail. Let's zoom in even a little bit more getting into sort of blocky stars territory now, but that's okay. That's really close. You know, I think we're seeing a few more stars on the Nikon because it's full spectrum. So we get some of those infrared stars. But you can definitely tell the difference between stars and noise. And in terms of just, you know, the amount of detail shown and the amount of random noise, I really am not seeing a huge difference between these two. Well, I'll let I'll let everyone who's watching be the judge here. I don't I'm not seeing much of a difference, which is I guess what I expected to not see a huge difference if the read noise is going to be the same at ISO 3200, but they look pretty close. And again, this is the Canon 60d 18 frame stacked the Nikon D 5300 18 frames at 30 seconds ISO 3200 stacked. Okay, so now on to the final event and this is where Nikon I think has the chance to really show its stuff. We did a single four minute exposure at ISO 400, where the read noise on the Canon is double that of the Nikon. And I don't know if you can see this in the video, but I'm already seeing issues here on the Canon even zoomed out all the way. So I think Nikon is going to beat the Canon here handily. But let's go ahead and zoom in and take a look. Yeah. And so here, this is where, you know, earlier, I think when we were looking at photons to photos, the website, I said, I wouldn't use Canon at below ISO 1600 part of it is what we call the read noise. But another part here is just that when you get to those lower ISOs on Canon cameras, this horizontal banding really shows up. That's quite noticeable. You can see it here, that really strong line right there. While here on the Nikon, I don't see any banding whatsoever. Otherwise, yeah, even just, you know, if we look at some of these finer details here on the Nikon, they're starting to really come into their own even in a single four minute exposure because we don't have as much noise. And in the Canon, they're really getting lost in the noise, those dim details. Now, of course, in the high signal areas, there's not going to be nearly as much difference between the two. So in the in the bright parts here of Orion Nebula, you're not going to see much difference. Yeah, I mean, it really depends on the part of the scene you're looking at like here. I don't see a huge difference. There's definitely more green noise that looks like on the Canon. You can see in this little blue reflection Nebula right here, it looks sort of green in the Canon. Well, it looks better in the Nikon. But it's really here when we just get to the empty sky. You see all of this banding, this horizontal banding going down in the empty sky area. While in the in the Nikon, the noise is much more evenly distributed throughout. Well, hopefully this gives you an idea. I mean, I can definitely see a difference. It's maybe not as extreme as I was expecting. But there's definitely a difference here. And the Nikon did beat out the the Canon in this ISO 400 challenge. So to end with going back to the title of this video, I'm not going to switch to Team Nikon at the moment. I've developed a style of imaging with Canon cameras, where I use full calibration, I work at the right ISO, and that works fine for me. I don't feel like I'm missing so much. But I have nothing against Nikon, and I'll gladly acknowledge that their sensors are more ISO invariant, and typically will have lower noise at lower ISOs, which has definite advantages for deep sky imaging. The big downside to Nikon crop sensor DSLRs is that they have very limited clip-in filter selection. So if you're mostly a lens based shooter rather than a telescope based shooter, and you want to use filters, then Canon is a better bet for that. Well, there are many other camera brands to try. I think the next one on my list that I'd like to try is Fuji. Not much support for astro accessories, but they make some really interesting cameras, and I've seen some cool results with Fuji cameras. Hope my reasoning here all made sense. I want to thank NightSky Camera again for sending this Nikon D5300, which made this shoot out possible. Until next time, this has been Nico Carver, NebulaFotos.com. Clear skies.