Good morning everyone. It is Tuesday and we are on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange with Jim Kramer to talk about the markets and more. Alright Jim, you just spoke with John Flannery. What's going through your mind? I think that John's got a tough task. I think he has to very quickly put the past behind him. He has to very rapidly move in order to be able to get the 20 billion proceeds that he wants to get in order to be able to have a much more simple organization. I think he's a straightforward guy. He's been dealt a very tough hand. I think the power that he owns is a very important business. They represent 30% of power worldwide. They have to figure out a way how to make money on that service revenue stream, which is really good. We've got two service revenue streams that are ideal, the aerospace service revenue stream and power. Healthcare has a very, very solid franchise, but they have to unwind things. I think part of the problem is that had you actually had a better feel for what the company was going to earn, you would have realized that perhaps the downturn was coming and it was much more steep. Even as recently as February, March, you were being told that business was quite good. So it's mystifying. The opaque numbers that the company reported, I think made you feel much more confident. We own a fraction alerts. It was clearly a mistake. I've said that many times. Why didn't we boot it out? I felt that if you like Mr. Flannery said, if you take a longer term perspective, they're going to fix it. Nelson Pelts, who's colleague Ed Gordon is now on the board from Try-In, has made some aggressive presentations and statements to me that by this time in two years from now the stock will be higher. My chapel trust, we take that long of view. So we're looking perhaps to buy some at $16, $17 if it gets there because then it would be valued as the worst conglomerate because arguably it is the worst conglomerate. I think the $5 that they can do, I think they can beat that provided they work fast to be able to dispose of the difficult divisions. Are you more worried about 2019 than 2018? 2019 concerns me only because 2019 was presented as, I'd say, fairly rosy for power. Power is the swing vote here. Oil and gas we know is not doing well. I mean, look, look at Slumberjake. Slumberjake is a much better company than Baker U.S.G. and that's everyone. I mean, I could say the same, Halibur, TransOcean, whatever, it's in service companies. And I think that they've got to get full value. I don't know how they do that for oil and gas. We know that locomotives, when I interviewed Jeff Immelt in February, he said they were doing very well. I get the sense that maybe they're not doing as well. There was just this miscommunications between what was doing well and what turned out to be not doing well. And I think what mystifies me is that it could have turned down in six months because big businesses like this tend not to turn down in six months. You tend not to be in a situation with a company like this where you think you're going to earn $2 and then it turns out to be $1.60, then $1.30 and then it turns out to be $1. These big companies tend to have much more predictable revenue streams, much more predictable earnings because they have long-tail businesses with service revenue. So what seems to be bothering me the most is how could the numbers be so bad if they were so good in February? That remains a question for me that is unresolved. What we have to do is a shareholder, my trust shareholder, is say, okay, Flannery's going to get his arms around it. Now, when you bring up the past, I'm mindful of once I went to hear Bishop Tutu speak and he was talking about how come South Africa went to become a society where from apartheid to a plurality. And he said that the reason it was able to was they created a Truth and Reconciliation Committee that really dealt with the so-called crimes of the past. I was trying in my interview to say, look, I need Truth and Reconciliation about what happened and why we thought it was so good. Now, some of that is personal because I was a fund manager for a very, very long time. I started investing stocks in 1979 and it's very rare that I could have misjudged a company like this without something going on with the company that made it so that you would have misjudged a Nortel, a Tyco. I'm looking at things where I've done wrong. I remember I run Action Alerts with an open hand and I look at those companies and those are the only companies where I was really, really betting on something that turned out to be not true. So I'm not accusing GE of any accounting fraud whatsoever. I am saying that they had a method of reporting that did, I think, present the same numbers that I might have looked at as Rosier than I thought. Again, not any SEC issue, just a way to be able to present the numbers that made them give you a level of comfort that you should never have had. And that's what I feel about GE because sometimes you do just get had. Sometimes you cannot be able to understand what's really going on. A very smart man like Nelson Peltz buys the stock 25-20, just goes to 30, recognizes and still believes in the stock and I believe that 2018 massive heavy lifting year, I think Mr. Flanagan will get his arms around it. I think that it's difficult and it's not in his interest to have truth and reconciliation to figure out what went wrong. But it's in my interest because I hurt people and I like to own that I did that. I don't hurt travel trust, people who count on me and I want to be able to say to people, you counted on me, here's the mistake I made. But when I go over the mistake I made, the mistake I made was about credibility. I thought that management had more credibility than it did have. And what I liked, what I wanted Mr. Flanagan to say is they didn't have credibility. But he's in a different position from me. He has to work at the company. He's gotten rid of MLT's people, which he has to do. But there is a level of pain that comes with recognizing that the way you report things, there were suboptimal verses what you would have loved to have known because had I known how the company was really doing, I would have been selling, not saying it's fine. And Jim, it's hard to look at GE when you have a company like Caterpillar reporting 19% growth. Well, we've got a company, Caterpillar, which I went over on my mad dash. It's reporting really sensational numbers. Now Caterpillar, it's not apples to apples. Caterpillar is earth moving equipment. GE has got a fabulous aerospace franchise. No one is doubting that. They've got a fairly good healthcare franchise, but certainly much better than it was. And that's Mr. Flannery. They do not have, when you go over Honeywell, Honeywell's got a similar profile. United Technologies has a similar profile, but Honeywell's got turbochargers. That's not GE's business. United Technologies has heating ventilation, air conditioning, obviously. It has Otis. Those are more cyclical and they can get hurt on a downturn. We had felt, again, coming back to what management had told us, that power was the secular growth business, that gas turbines were secular growth. And I believe that, why? Because in our country, 35% of our power had been generated by coal not that long ago. Now gas has passed that through power companies that have chosen to close coal and build natural gas turbines, as they call them. And I think that I believed, as I went and I interviewed so many utility managers, and I liked having the CEOs on, I had seen all of them say, listen, we're moving very fast to natural gas. Around the world, they're moving to natural gas, getting out of coal. China even saying, listen, we can't do coal. India is still an outlier. So I had felt that the fundamentals of the natural gas turbine business were strong, which made me then say, you know what, that's a good business. And when they bought Alstom, I was unsure. Matt Horway, who writes with me, is a really, really good judge of things. He and I were very skeptical of buying a company in France because it's very hard to lay off people. But you know what? Jeff Immel assured us that the synergies, which he first thought would be a billion, are going to be three billion. Now there again, where's the three billion in synergies? I don't see it. So I keep coming back to the mistake I made was to believe. And that's quite different from not doing your homework. But it doesn't help because it produced the same result. All right. And for more on GE, everyone can tune in to Jim's Action Alerts Plus call at 11.30 live today. We can't wait for that. Jim, moving on work capital reportedly offering to buy Buffalo Wild Wings. What do you think? Yeah.  I don't know work capital. I think that buying a restaurant chain that does not have momentum is not what I would do. One of the things that has hurt Buffalo Wild Wings, I know this from Bar St. Miguel, is that you frankly need to make your money on the liquor because you can't make that much money on food. But this new generation of people likes takeout. And they don't necessarily, they want the wings, but they might not stay. And the problem with that is therefore you don't get their liquor. And if you don't get the liquor orders, then what happens is you really, as we know from Red Robin, Gourmet, which is a really amazing conference call, that things are happening so quickly that you end up realizing that you've run into a wings-to-go issue. Where you order wings or you order pizza at home through Alexa. You just tell them to order it and then you get liquor at home, which is much cheaper. Now, I know that people like to go out. I charge for Bar St. Miguel at the same price, the prevailing price for the big constellation brands, which is people like Pacifico and they like Madelo, Corona, and these are good brands. But people in the end, and constellation is a great stock, and I think that keeps going hard. People in the end don't want to go out and buy and sit there and have wings, and sit there and drink expensive liquor if they can do it at home. Jim, meanwhile, Home Depot reported great comparable store sales. How come the stock isn't reacting that much?  People sell it. It reaches a level. Sometimes it goes down a lot. And then it comes back. I think that to sell it is to think that those numbers are not sustainable, that very big guide up. I think they are. TJX to sell it is to say that you don't care that Puerto Rico was included in the comp numbers. 35 stores that were closed, that's meaningful. And TJX is apparel. So you're really betting that it wasn't Northeast warm weather that hurt TJX. It was just lack of execution. Now, obviously, again, this retails very hard. We only have one retailer in Action Alerts, thank heavens. And I thought it was more immune because they are the recipient of all the inventory that the Macy's and the JC Penney's have to get rid of. I like TJX and I think people are giving up on that. I like Home Depot and people are giving up on that. But let's remember the market is ugly. We've been through a period, a very benign period. We want the market, those of us who are bullish want the market to come down a bit. Why? Because it got overheated. You want others to come in. You want others to come in who otherwise might have thought they missed it. This is their opportunity. We often talk about on mad money and in my real money writings that what you want is for stocks to pull back.  I will not come up with those excuses. I see things I like. Jim, staying with Retail, we want to just end with earnings to watch. Anything you're expecting from targets results? There is a dichotomy here between what they can report. I think that they have a lot of good proprietary clothing and will help people will react. And maybe people are reacting. If you go over, for instance, what happened at Macy's, Macy's had a pretty good quarter when it comes to capital structure. The stock goes up and then it gets hit again. The same thing could happen to Target. It could go up and then get hit again. The group is continually being challenged by Amazon at Brickson Mortar. I know Doug Cass said, look, you can buy plants on Amazon. So don't think that Home Depot has got a lock on that. Those of us who are gardeners know that you can't buy plants on Home Depot on Amazon because you need to check the plants. I mean, that's what gardeners do. We don't buy that flat, we buy this flat. There are reasons why Home Depot has good numbers. I also think that the rebuild of Texas and the rebuild in Florida will be substantial because, particularly in Texas, there are insurance checks that you get and people go to Home Depot, contractors go to Home Depot. I'm not saying I'm sanguine about retail. I am saying I'm sanguine about certain retailers. And I just think that the whole group is getting thrown out. The group is also challenged by ETFs. Notice Walmart's been very strong, so people have decided that Walmart's the only one that can take on Amazon. I think that there are a couple that can take on Amazon. But I do think that in the end, people think that Target is challenged with BOPUS, which is a buy online pickup in store and that BOPUS is losing credibility as a way to be able to compete with Amazon. When I buy Target, as I said earlier, we've already stuck our head in the oven with TGX, which is better than Target. You don't need to stick your head in the oven twice. All right, Jim Cramer, we'll leave it there. Thank you so much. As always, all right, everyone, go to ActionAlertsPlus.com, join the club, and watch Jim's call live at 11.30.


Welcome to ASU Ked Talks, the podcast. I'm your host, Robin Trocolis, and I'm here with Karen Anderson, a researcher at ASU's Biodesign Institute, and a clinician based at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona. When Anderson is not in the clinic treating patients with breast cancer, she's in her lab studying immunotherapy, a new way of treating various forms of cancer. Hi, Karen. Thanks for being here. Good morning, Robin. Would you briefly explain what immunotherapy is? Well, the goal of immunotherapy is to harness the immune system to target cancer. And there are many ways you can do that. We know that the immune system is already there. It's already trying to track and to target cancer naturally. In fact, but the cancer evolves and it grows and it develops ways to evade the immune system. And so, immunotherapy is about activating T cells, about giving antibodies, about trying to create a strong immune system so that the cancer can be killed. And one of the advantages of that is that the immune system can go anywhere.  When we talked previously, you had mentioned that immunotherapy appears to have been around at the turn of the 20th century and was even mentioned in the New York Times back then. Can you tell me a little bit more about that? Yeah. The history is fascinating. It started, I would say, with Coley's toxins, which was essentially like a bacterial lysate, like an extract, and it was essentially that was delivered into tumors. And what it turned out, what it was really doing was trying to activate a lot of the innate immune response in and around the tumors. And so, this had gotten some news and some press back then. And there were some isolated cases of responses. And that led to that plus the burgeoning field of immunology really led to a lot of work over a period of really a century trying to identify how to harness it, how to target it, how to get it to work. But it was really not until the last 15 years that we have been able to harness it specifically and directly to really show a benefit consistently for a number of patients. Why has it been the last 15 years? Do you know? Well, it's about understanding the individual molecules that regulate the immune system. So, one of the amazing things about your immune system is that it's balanced. It always is balancing between fighting an infection and then recovering from that without causing autoimmunity, without being too activated. Because when that happens, you get really sick. And so, there's all these redundant pathways, these redundant molecules that help govern it. I liken it to having your foot on the gas and the brake at the same time on a car. And so, that way if you just manipulate one of them a little bit, it either stops you or pushes you forward very, very quickly. When we talked before, you'd also mention that there was a breakthrough in immunotherapy that came in 2010. And it was for metastatic melanoma, if I'm remembering correctly. What did you think about that breakthrough and why melanoma as opposed to another type of cancer? Yeah, the history is interesting, but there were many, many trials over decades of people trying to show, can we drive T-cell responses? Can we drive immune therapies to cancer? And it was very clear in all the preclinical models that it was feasible. But when it came to actually treating patients and treating tumors, it was really difficult. And one of the keys for that particular study, we had hints earlier on in earlier clinical trials that that was going to be feasible. But melanoma in particular is a very immunogenic tumor. We've known that for a long time. It's relatively resistant to chemotherapies. But it's very sensitive to the immune system. So in fact, one of the therapies that we'd already been using for melanoma was a cytokine, basically an immune therapy anyway. But this was the first time that just activating the T-cells could then target the melanoma.  And what they do is they just blocked it. And then activated all those T-cells and it turns out that for some patients with the melanoma, that had really important and most importantly a durable effect. So it didn't just happen and work briefly, but it worked for a long time. And it wasn't as if the cancer was gone away. A lot of times it's just, it's putting it into what we call homeostasis, but into a balance. It's sort of like the immune system sees it, the cancer is there, but neither of them are winning. You're at a truce. But a truce means the cancer is not growing and it is a win. With immunotherapy, it seems that the focus on cancer treatment has turned away from the tumor. Are tumor banks still important for research? And if so, why? Oh my goodness, they're so important. Everybody's cancer is different. Everybody's immune system is different. But not only is everybody's cancer different, but there's a lot of heterogeneity within those tumors. So one part of the cancer or one metastasis from the cancer may be genetically different and behave differently than another. Oncologists have known this for a long time and patients have known this. You might be under a therapy for a while and most everything is responding, but one spot might not be responding because it's acquired different mutations. It's acquired resistance. So tumor banks help us dissect all that out and help us figure that out. Otherwise, we're using model systems that are much more homogeneous and to understand, to me, that's one of the advantages of the immune system is that it's a diverse system to begin with. It has incredible diversity because it doesn't know what's coming at it. It might be a virus. It might be a bacteria. It might be a fungus. It has to have this incredible defense system. You have no idea what's coming at it, so it has to adapt to that. The same is true for trying to fight cancer because cancer may have one mutation or different mutations or different genetic changes. It could be a lung cancer or a melanoma or a bladder cancer, any of those. That's where the diversity is a real strength. Now, what is your dream when it comes to treating patients with cancer? I think that in the near future, I think we will find ways to vaccinate people and treat people with immune therapy after their diagnosis. With the goal to prevent recurrence, could we actually do without chemotherapy? Could we do without surgery? Can we do without radiation? These are all unanswered questions, but I think we're just really scratching the surface of what these treatments can do and how to tailor them for different types of cancers because there are many different molecules involved in the process. There are a number of different drug targets that are coming down the pike. I think we have this opportunity. Maybe it's vaccines and target immune therapy. Maybe it's adoptive T-cells and CAR T-therapies. It may be different for different types of treatment, but if we can do this to reduce recurrence rates, we're going to have a real impact on the lives of cancer survivors. Can I ask what made you go into medicine and in particular oncology? Wow, it's a great question. I have always been interested in science. From the time I was in middle school and high school, both of my parents are chemists. We sat around the table talking math and science. This was part of our growing up. My brother and sister are all engineers and mathematicians and computer scientists. That's what we do. We have very little artistic talent amongst us. I went to college at the University of Virginia and I volunteered in a research laboratory there. That really made a difference for me. It was back when we were just starting DNA sequencing and PCR didn't exist. Simple things like that, that we weren't doing yet. Learning and understanding that every day was going to be different when I came in. To me, just being able to do that as part of my research and also being able to bring that to patient care, I figured that would be a great way to spend my life. In that vein, if you weren't a physician and a researcher, what would you think you'd be doing instead? I'd probably be a large animal veterinarian, but if not that maybe I'd run a bakery somewhere in the world somewhere, yes. Not well. I'm not sure anyone would come, but yes.


To that time I have pulled out every single one of my Charlotte Tilbury eyeshadow palettes and I am gonna rank them from worst to best. Now did you know I originally started this series because I saw Kelsey Breonna J do it first? She has started this ranking manic that we have going on on YouTube and I have not a lot of fun with it. I was gonna say I did, I didn't. I have a lot of fun when it's done but y'all like to put me in stressful situations. I love Charlotte Tilbury eyeshadow palettes. I will say don't necessarily recommend her formula to everybody. It's definitely an acquired taste considering the price. Let me just give you a little tidbit here. If you are interested in trying the Charlotte Tilbury formula I would go with her bigger palettes, her 12-pan palettes as opposed to the quads. The quads I feel like you have to kind of already love her formula to love the quads so while I love Charlotte Tilbury she's definitely very very pricey and not always worth it in all occasions. In total you guys we have 31 palettes that I have ranked today so grab a snack, grab a drink, you can pause this, I'll let you and let's get into it. So number 31, my absolute least favorite palette in my Charlotte collection is the luxury palette of pops in Supersonic Girl. I do not believe you can get this anymore. Thank goodness there was something about this one that was just a pure mess. Now since this quad has been released she has improved her formula of the luxury palette of pops but her older ones you will see I strongly dislike and they will be towards the bottom so I don't recommend this if you happen to run across it. Not only does it fall all over your face, it gets hard panned, it's just I just don't feel motivated to pick it up. It's just it's a huge disappointment okay okay. Number 30 is the Bella Sofia and this is one I believe you can still get. So here's the thing her older palettes that have been around for a while for the most part they just aren't as good of a formula. I find them to be more dry and patchy. The formulation she's come up with in the last couple of years has been so much better. This is one of the ones that I feel like looks super patchy on my eyes. It's just unacceptable for the price. You can get a good look with it I suppose but the pop shade here gets really hard panned and I just find the mattes don't really blend out to a smooth finish. It looks really patchy so every time I wear this I just I don't like my eye makeup. I feel like it looks like I don't know what I'm doing. Number 29 similar feelings to the one I just told you about. This is the Vintage Vamp. Again I believe this one is still in her permanent line. Don't do it. These matches are terrible. They are so extremely patchy probably even patchier than the one that I just showed you. I like the shimmers in here a little bit better but the warm colors even though I'm wearing warm colors but the colors in here aren't my vibe.  Number 28 is the Luxury Palette of Pops meaning it is all the pop formulation in Pillow Talk. This I like the colors of better than Super Sonic Girl but it still is just the pop formula that I don't love. This older pop formulation of hers I find to be really messy. There is no base color very overpriced. They get really hard panned. While I like the colors a little bit better it is fun to just pop it on the lid. It just doesn't do enough to justify the price you know. Number 26 is the Dream Gasm Eyeshadow Palette. Again these warm shades from her when you put them in the crease they look patchy. I just don't really care for this one. I find it to be forgettable. I never use it. You can get a really pretty Charlotte Tuberty S kind of wash all over the lid with this quad but it's so doable within her own range. There is nothing exciting about this one. The quality is like not the greatest. Don't like the color story so much so yeah this one just kind of falls right here. Number 26 is the Glamour Muse. I wanted to like this one so much. I mean it's ranking not high but up here because I do enjoy the color story. This shade in particular right here is really beautiful but the quality is lacking with this one. It's just overall a drier formulation. This shade right here the purple is really really patchy which is unfortunate because that is kind of the star of the show. That's the color you want to work the best. It just is an outdated formula. It's not good. Don't recommend it. Number 25. I'm actually wearing this one right? Is this the one I'm wearing? Yes. I'm wearing this one on my eyelids. I wanted to use it today just to double check. So this is the Hollywood flawless eye filter in the shade Eyes of a Star. This launch from Charlotte Tuberty just wasn't my favorite. It's her take on the baked gelé kind of formula and it's not a bad formulation. It's not patchy like the ones that I previously mentioned. I do like the look that I got. It's just an extremely overpriced formula. There really is nothing special about this to warrant being $53. The color story is super boring. I could get this with any other palette on the market and yeah I mean the quality is good. It's just not special like at all. Number 24. Oh okay you guys are gonna fight me on this but I just don't care for this one that much. This is exaggerize. It is so pretty. We're at the turning point now where these palettes tend to have a better formula. I like them a little bit more but it's supposed to be like the most flattering palette for every eye color. It's so boring to me. I don't really love the way my eyes look when I wear this. Like it's a pretty look but I like more depth personally. This doesn't give me what I want it to give me. Don't get me wrong this gives you kind of like a wet effect on the eye but these the rest of the shades I just I'm bored by. This palette is just boring to me. Good quality. I can see why so many people would love it but it's just it's not for me. Number 23. This one actually came out for the holiday season. This is a luxury palette of pearls in cosmic pearl. I can't say too much about it. It's good. It's just not that pretty to me. This one is more of a color story thing as to why it's ranking where it's ranking. Like this is her most updated formula. It is so so good. So creamy. Can't say anything bad about that. I just don't love this duochrome shade. Like it's fine but it doesn't give me oomph. I wish I had more glimmer to it and then these shades right here are all very dupable within the Charlotte Tilbury line so it just doesn't stand out to me. Number 22. This is another one you guys are going to fight me on but this is the iconic pillow talk. I don't understand the hype. I really do think it's overhyped. It's pretty on the eyelid. You can get really pretty blushing bridal type of look which I'm very into that. I am a bridal makeup artist but I do find that this palette pools really warm on me and I want more blushing pinks not warm pinks and this gives me more warm pinks. I just think it's an overrated palette. It's pretty. I like it. I just don't love it. Number 21 is the flawless eye filter palette in the shade Star Aura and this one is another one of her baked gelay formulations. I like this one. It's pretty soft on the eyelid. I actually have learned to appreciate softer tones a lot more nowadays. I don't always need that depth but again her baked gelay formula is good but it's not great and you pay $53 for such small pans so for me this just isn't the baked formula that I would recommend that you go for. This one is very very pretty though. I actually didn't really like it when I first got it and now that my taste has evolved I like this one a lot more but yeah it's just not worth the price you know. Number 20 here's the turning point for sure. I really like all of these from now on. This is where I got a little bit more cut throat so we have the Rock Chick and this one I wish I could have ranked higher but I just don't wear these colors a lot. This is a little bit too gray for me. I like more neutral cooler tones. This is like cool tones like gray gray. Really neat really nice color story really great quality if you wear grays. I don't wear grays very often so I don't reach for this one as much. Number 19 is the Super Blue Quad. This I feel like when she launched this with a few other quads that I will talk about later on. Her formula took a turn for the best. Her formulation all of a sudden was no longer dry. It was really really creamy. The shimmers were nice and thick. Love the quality on this. I just don't wear blues very much. I don't find them to be very flattering on me. I've had fun with this palette. I actually in particular really love this brown but too blue for me personally. I'm not mad at it. I just don't wear it that often. Number 18 is the Sophisticate and this is an all matte quad kind of boring but Charlotte Tilbury when she does mattes and they're done well they're done really really well. This isn't her best matte formula. I would say I picked this up because I liked that they were more cool mattes here. I'll reach for this from time to time not the most often but it is a pretty nice matte formulation. 17 is the Last Flawless Eye Filter Palette. The Big Chalet formulation Diva Lights. I'm wearing like three shades from this palette on my lid. So I used the first Chalet palette that I showed you but then I took some of the black in my outer corner. I popped a little bit of this copper color in the center to give me a little extra glow and I used this as my inner corner highlight. So I'm also using this one. I think this one is my favorite of the Big Chalet ones just because of the variety that you get here and the depth. It's again just that solid Big Chalet formula nothing special but this is pretty easy to use. I will give it that. Very easy to blend. Number 16 is the Super Nudes Easy Eye Palette. If you are looking for a great all matte travel palette this one is very very nice. These have more of like a slippery matte. Her best matte formulation in my opinion feels a little bit more creamy but this one is super easy on the go. You can really just swipe it on your eyes very fast. Like I said that slick texture actually makes it really quick and mess free to create a look. So yeah it's a different matte formula than what I'm used to from her but I really do like it. Number 15 I am going down aren't I? Pretty quick I feel like this is the Dazzling Diamonds Luxury Palette of Pops. This was from Holiday Season 2020 right? Yes and this is the best pop formula she's come out with. These are so much better than the older ones that I showed you in the beginning. These have a base. They don't fall out as crazy. They look really beautiful. They just hold their own in the quad making it much more with the money. I hope she comes out with more palette of pops like these because these are the pop shades that I want to grab for. They don't really get hard panned either like her older pop formulation. This was just a huge step up. Love this one. Number 14 is Copper Charge. This is one of my favorite formulas from her. It's a nice kind of warm palette. The matte here super duper pigmented easy to blend and very rich and creamy shimmers as well just to get a great everyday warm sort of copper eye. I've reached for this one a lot. I think it's beautiful. I love the gold in here so yeah that's at 14. Number 13 is the Uptown Girl. This is not her best formulation. It's definitely one of her older palettes but I just love this color story so much. This is better than the Rock Chick because I feel it's a bit more neutral. The Rock Chick was more gray than this one but this one has more neutral lid colors to kind of tone down the grayness here.  I swear you look like an angel. This is truly a Charlotte Tilbury eye look if you ask me so I love this one. I reached for it quite a lot within my Charlotte Tilbury collection. Number 12 is Green Lights. This is one of my favorite green palettes that I recommend if you are looking for like a semi wearable khaki kind of eye quad that is green. This is the way to go. It's a really beautiful formula here. I wish there was a creamier matte in here. She has this one which has glitter particles. The glitter particles are kind of strong but other than that I just think it's a really great quality green palette. Greens are so in style right now so that's why it's ranking a little bit more towards the top. Number 11 is Desert Haze. This has very warm toned neutrals here which I am surprised that I'm ranking this this high but the quality of these mattes are pure butter. They are just one of those formulas that blend themselves out. I don't know what it is about this quad in particular but I notice in this quad in particular the mattes are absolutely exceptional. The best matte formulation she's ever had has been in this quad. They literally do the work for you. Alright guys we are into the top 10 now. This is where the bigger palettes come in. Obviously I love her bigger palettes more. I think that they are better quality and the best value. Number 10 is a quad. So let me talk about number 10 first. So this is Mesmerizing Maroon. Again just a really phenomenal formulation. It's not very maroon like the name says. To me it's a little bit more plummy. I mean this shade is a little bit maroon but yeah anyways I love this color story. This is an ideal color story that I feel very comfortable in and want to reach for often so times of use color story that I feel comfortable with that's why this is ranking where it's ranking. Okay number nine is the first big palette. I said this before but you definitely if you are looking to get into Charlotte Tilbury these are the way to go. They are by far the best value and in some cases I feel like have a much more reliable formulation and you get a little taste of everything with these typically. So this is the instant eye smokey eyes are forever. This is her 2021 holiday palette. Really really beautiful. I do like this one a lot even if it's ranking towards the bottom. You have these smokey tones here. Coppers, greens and light pinks. This is why I say if you're going to try your formula you have to try this one out. Whatever is available to you for the 12 pence you'll be a okay. This one is absolutely stunning. A great quality. It's my least favorite I would say of the 12 panniers that came out color story wise but quality wise it's up there. Number eight is the Golding Goddess. This one isn't her best quality. It's her older formula. The colors are a little bit dry but I just love the way that this looks on my eyes. It creates one of my favorite everyday looks. It's a cooler toned neutral type of look and then you get this really pretty glimmery shade all over the lid. It gives an effortless everyday eye for me even while I will admit the quality on this isn't the best. I simply wear this all the time because I love the look that this gives me. It's my ideal everyday look. Number seven is from the holiday season this year. This is the Celestial Pearl luxury palette of Pearl Quad. I think I got a lot of you to buy this. This to me embodies the Charlotte Tilbury Supermodel Eye. It doesn't have a lot of depth but that is the beauty of it. It's about awakening the eyes and giving the eyes a glowy finish. Just something that I would feel like if Charlotte Tilbury were to throw a model down the runway. This is the quad that they would be wearing. There also was a really amazing duo crochet that she has not created a formulation like since or prior. One of my all time favorite quads from Charlotte Tilbury. If you still have the opportunity to pick this one up and you like that supermodel glowy low depth kind of look this is it. This is the best. Number six is another 12 panner. This is the Stars in Your Eyes palette. Honestly this one is a few years old. You definitely can't get it anymore but I like this one because it leans a little bit more purple and mauve-y. So smoky eyes are forever. You definitely get a little bit more taste of different color stories but this one for me is just a color story that I feel very comfortable with and that I really truly enjoy. So it's old but it still holds its quality you guys. That's why I love luxury eyeshadow palettes. I feel like they just hold the quality for a little bit longer than the more affordable options. Are you ready for number five? This is the Instant Eye Palette in Pillow Talk. If you don't know this was my wedding palette so it does hold a little special place in my heart. I think had I not used it for my wedding it would probably not rank quite as high but this one has sentimental value to me. It's a very very pink palette so you don't get too much variety with it but the quality is great. Be careful with her pinks because sometimes they do run a little bit warm but yeah I mean I'm ranking this high because for me personally it has sentimental value. I think it gives you a really pretty pink blushed kind of look. Number four is an oldie but such a goodie. I think it was so underrated at the time even by myself and now that I've had it for a few years I love it so much. So this is the icon palette. This is in a different setup than what she normally comes out with now but I love this. I find oddly enough that this is the palette that I feel like dupes so many of her launches now. Like when I want to find similar colors to a new palette to prove that maybe you don't need the new palette I always pull colors from here. Like for some reason this palette really embodies Charlotte's favorite colors to use. The quality is different than all of the other palettes that I'm talking today. It's not quite a bake your life formula but it has a certain slickness to it but it still is really great quality. Heavy on the pigment, heavy on the shine. I love everything about this palette. I feel like you get more variety than meets the eye with this and something about the finish of these are extra glimmery. I love this one. The longer I've had it the more that I've enjoyed having it. I really think it's a special palette in her line. I love the jewel tones. That's that. Number three is the Queen of Glow. It can still get the squad if you want it so that's great news. Absolutely stunning. This is just so rich. It's gonna look beautiful if you have a rich skin tone. If you have a rich skin tone and you want to know what palette to get from Charlotte Tilbury it's this one. This is better than her 12 panors. You know how I've been recommending the 12 panors if you have a rich skin tone or you just want the best of the best with the quads. This is it super rich buttery matte and then some of the best shimmer formulations I've ever come across. It is a stunning stunning palette. There's a reason so many people love it. It really is that good. Number two is probably my favorite instant eye palette to come out. This is the Bejeweled Eyes to Hypnotize palette. I personally just love the tones in this one. They speak to me. You have more of like a warm neutral mustard area here. More pinks, more purples and taupey colors. So this right here is my favorite variety of Charlotte Tilbury colors. Again I say the quality in here tends to be the most consistent for real. I just love this one. I don't know. This one is my favorite color story to have come out from these little 12 panors and I love the packaging. Okay guys you'll probably already know what my number one favorite Charlotte Tilbury palette is. If you're at all familiar with my channel I got to give it to this discontinued. I'm sorry Fire Rose Quad. I hope she's developing a Fire Rose collection as we speak because us Americans have been trying to get our hands on this quad. It's sold out so fast and then you couldn't get it anymore except like in Europe. Anyways mine has like broken so I'm gonna keep it flat but just know this is like the most beautiful quad Charlotte Tilbury has ever come out with. The matte super blendable. There's a shimmer in here that's her rich thick shimmer formula. There is a really pretty gelé kind of metallic shade stunning and then there's a glimmery shade like it's a pop formula. It's one of her pop formulas but it's better than all of the other pop formulas. There's something about it that's extra glittery extra reflective. I just have so much love for this quad. It might be number one because it is so limited and it just makes it that much more valuable to me but yeah that's like in terms of anything I showed up how it why I said I've ever owned from Charlotte Tilbury that is her best formula and it also is a really great array of colors as well. So any hoosers. Very happy you guys. I just ranked 31. Charlotte Tilbury palettes for you guys. I went through that pretty quick like pats for me taps for me anyways. I hope you guys enjoyed this video and found it helpful. Share your subscribe to my channel because I am in the season of rankings right now. This is my third that I filmed this week and I have a couple more than I'm filming. I have no idea what order these are going on but yeah just make sure you're subscribed. Check out the videos that I have if you had fun with this and without further ado I hope you found this helpful and I will see you guys in the next one. Bye guys have a good one.