If you are brand new in real estate or if you're just looking for something to get some serious momentum going in your business, this is going to be the video for you. What's up everybody? Ricky Kruth here. Welcome back to my channel. So the title of this video is, Why You Should Do Your First Real Estate Deal For Free. And I know a lot of you are probably thinking, why in the world would I do a real estate deal for absolutely free? And I'll tell you right now, this is something that I wish I would have known from day one in real estate 17 years ago. I would be so much further ahead in my career right now if I understood the principles that I'm going to talk about in this video. It took me eight long months to make my first sale. I would have made my first sale a lot sooner if I would have known when I'm fixing to tell you. So first I want to tell you why you should do your first deal for free and then I'm going to tell you how you should do your first deal for free.   So if you aren't subscribed, click subscribe, hit the bells and get notified when I go live and also sign up for my absolutely free coaching program. I'm the very first absolutely completely 100% free real estate coach in the world and that is at zero to diamond.com. And as always, reach out if you need anything in the world. You can reach me on Instagram, email, comment below this video. I answer every single engagement. So if there's anything you need, reach out to me. So let's get into why you need to sell your first property for absolutely free. The entire zero to diamond philosophy, the main topic, the main philosophy, our tagline is relationships over transactions. In the very first half of my career, I did real estate completely backwards from the way that it should be done. Everything for me was about the transaction, the money, the closing, the deal. It wasn't about the people and it took me having to lose everything in the crash and going bankrupt and homeless for a brief moment in my life to realize what I had done wrong and how I needed to rebuild my business based on relationships, not transactions. So when I got back in the business, I started creating and maintaining lifelong relationships with my clients. I didn't care if they bought or sold anything. I just wanted to help them for the rest of my life anytime they wanted to buy or sell something or if they knew anybody that wanted to buy or sell anything. I quickly learned that every prospect that I do this with is where 10 to 20 deals to me over the life of my career, regardless if they do anything the day or the month or even the year that I talk to them for the first time. A lot of trainers, a lot of coaches will tell you if they're not motivated, move on. To me, that's absolutely the wrong advice. Most of my business nowadays and the reason why I'm able to sell 100 properties a year for the last five years straight is through the exact process that I'm telling you, creating and maintaining lifelong relationships with so many property owners, so many potential buyers in my market. You cannot worry if they're going to do a deal with you or not. And a lot of agents come to me and they ask me, how do I convert? When I go to a listing appointment, how do I get them to sign the listing agreement? And my answer is, you don't. Your job is not to convert them. Your job is not to make them sign that listing agreement. There's nothing you're going to magically say that's going to make them sign the line or do the deal. They already know when they want to do the deal. They need an agent they feel comfortable with that makes them feel like a friend or family member. I call it the FE effect. They need somebody that's going to represent them the way that they want to be represented and not try to high pressure them into a situation just because the agent wants to make some money. The number one skill in real estate is not how to get somebody to sign the line or knowing how to handle objections or any of that stuff. The number one skill is learning how to effectively communicate who you are as a person to your clients, that you care, that you're hardworking, that you're dependable, that you're professional, that you're knowledgeable, that you're going to go over the top to help them through whatever the situation is they're trying to get through and make sure everything goes smooth for them.  You need to go after a prospect and help them for absolutely nothing. What happens is you begin this relationship with this prospect and they will never ever use another agent ever in their life, ever again and they're going to refer everybody they know to you. I've been thinking about this for several, several weeks and I've been contemplating and I've been trying to figure out what the strategy should be on this and my strategy is with for sale by owners, right? You can't take an owner and say I'm going to list your property for free. You can't put it on MLS in your name for zero commission. Your broker would not agree with that. That's just not how it's going to work. But you can go to a for sale by owner and you can consult them. You can help them. You can teach them how to put it on MLS their self. You can show them how to make better remarks, get professional pictures, advise them on the price. You can do all the things and teach them all the little secrets about how to sell it on their own. Don't be the gatekeeper of MLS. Show them how to put it on MLS. A lot of agents want to hold that part back and be the gatekeeper so that the for sale by owner thinks that they have to have an agent to put it on MLS. Not true. The strategy is very simple. We're going to advise them. We're going to put them in the best position. We're not going to hold back anything. We're going to tell them every little thing that we know that will help them get that property sold. Maybe some staging, maybe some painting, maybe some repairs. We're going to give them everything, everything we can possibly do to help them sell that property. And to take it a step further, I would even make phone calls. Make phone calls to property owners who you think might could upgrade to the property that's for sale. So a lot of things happen here. What happens is, as far as the for sale by owner is concerned, you went over the top to try to help them get their property sold. What if they don't sell it and they get ready to list it? They're tired of all the showings. They're tired of dealing with all the buyers. They're tired of dealing with people who say they're going to do stuff and show up at different times or don't follow through with offers. They're just tired of it and they're ready to just give it to an agent. What agent? Who do you think they're going to list with? They're going to list with you because you were there trying to help them for zero commissions. Okay, let's think about the flip side. Let's think about if they do get it sold their self through your advice. Okay, now they're ready to buy. Who do you think they're going to buy through? The one who is helping them for zero commissions and when they buy they don't pay a commission at all. So they're a lot more apt to deal with an agent in the buying process, somebody that's going to represent them, somebody's going to look out for them and their best interests than they are when they're trying to sell a property. In a couple weeks, a couple months, a couple years, their cousin, brother, mother, daughter wants to buy a house or sell a house, who do you think they're going to refer that person to? You. Let's say you took the rest of my advice. You started making phone calls to try to sell that property. Let's talk about the magic that happens there. When you're talking to these property owners who might want to upgrade to the for sale by owner, okay, you're going to run into all kinds of people and have all kinds of incredible conversations. You're going to create so many future relationships. There may be some people in that batch of phone calls that want to do business now. They don't want the for sale by owner. They want something else that's listed. They want to sell their house. They're looking for an agent. They're thinking about doing this or that. This is how you get business going. You stir the pot. You talk to people. You get on the phone. You create activity. Okay, you take massive action. Okay, let's run through it again. We're going to call for sale by owners. We're going to help them. We're going to let them know. We want to consult them and try to sell their property. We don't want anything out of it. We just want them to get that property sold. That's all we're there for. So we're going to consult them. We're going to help them get it on MLS on their own. We're going to look at their remarks, the price, the pictures. Make sure they're professional pictures. We're going to see if there's anything they might want to do to the house to try to make it more appealing to buyers. Then we might actually make phone calls. Okay, we're now with phone calls that's dual purpose. I like to have dual purpose with everything I do. Okay, the purpose of the phone calls is to maybe help that for sale by owner, sell their house so that they can buy something from you. And at the same time, you may run into more future clients. Okay, so there's dual purpose there. It's not just one objective. Everything I do has more than one objective. Okay, let's run through the different scenarios of the different results that could happen, okay? The seller of the for sale by owner could sell it on their own and buy something from you. Great. They could go ahead and list it with you because they're tired of trying to sell it on their own. Great. Out of the phone calls, you can run into all kinds of clients that want to do business now or later. Great. Let's say that the for sale by owner sells it on their own and buys on their own. Or buys through a different agent. Or they didn't really, you know, you didn't feel appreciated because there was really zero contact after that. And they just went away and went somewhere else. That's fine too. You're not going to win them all, okay? It's, you're just not going to win them all. It's okay if someone does this to you. This is part of the business that you guys got to understand. Okay? The point is, is maybe you want to do this or cross five or 10 for sale by owners and kind of see what happens. You're going to get six or seven out of the 10 that do future business with you for the rest of their life. Okay? Like I said from the beginning, if I would have known this from day one, I would have been doing deals within my first month using this strategy. You need momentum in not transactions and not business and not money. You need momentum in relationships in the business to get to the money. The more relationships you have, the more transactions you're going to have, period. So I'm really looking forward to putting this strategy in action Thursday. Click subscribe, hit the bell so you can get notified when I go live there. I'm going to be calling for sale by owners and I'm going to go through this process live for you to watch. So tune in and shoot me some comments. So I'll be answering questions and all that good stuff. I've really been enjoying the process of helping you guys.  It's motivated me not only to push harder in the coaching world and help more and more agents, but it's also elevating my real estate game. So I thank you, thank you, thank you for that. And if there's anything in the world I could do for you, reach out, we'll talk to you guys soon.


we come back today and we start where we left off, we are slightly behind the schedule. So we will start with problem solving particularly related to work interaction but we will spend some time because there is a section here, section 4 problem solving in thermodynamics. So that is what we are going to look at. In the middle of a problem we will really talk of it as an exercise, exercise in understanding, exercise in assimilation, exercise in writing something down step by step so that first the teacher who will evaluate it and later on anybody else will understand what actually is happening. So we begin perhaps by looking at our exercises and my favorite happens to be 1.3, let us begin with 1.3 and later on we can extend that principle to others, 1.3 we would solve and discuss in detail. So there are a few steps which we would like to follow and those steps are essentially written down in the method of solution problem solving in thermodynamics item 4 and remember that when you teach someone not just the answer but the method of solution or how the answer has been obtained and how it is presented is more important. My TAs are sitting behind you, they will tell you how meticulous we have to be particularly with undergraduate students and the impression that answers by themselves, the number and all that do not really count should be emphasized by providing a low weightage to it. So basically 70-30, 70 for the procedure, 30 for the actual numerical, in fact I would prefer that a solution be presented in the procedure followed by computation part as far as possible do not mix up the procedure and computation but in the very first illustration it may be difficult to do because the school and the first year of engineering college it is usually formula, computation answer, formula, computation answer that type of methodology whereas what we will finally like to have is the whole formulation first followed by the actual numericals. Sometimes this is not possible to follow because in the formulation you will have 2 or 3 branches which branch you take will depend on which condition is satisfied or not satisfied. So you do up to that do the calculation then you decide I have to follow this branch and continue. We will follow a mix of this when we tackle exercise 1.3. If you look at 1.3 first a cool headed reading of any exercise is a must. So let us see what we have a system containing 5 kg of a substance it is stirred with a torque of some torque is given at some speed for some time. So first thing we should realize that a tau d theta or stirrer work type of interaction is involved then it says the system meanwhile expands from some volume to some other volume against a given pressure that means there is a expansion work also immediately one should realize that there are more than one mode of work. Once an expansion is involved something like a gaseous fluid, expansible fluid is supposed to be the substance which it talks about then it says determine the net work done in kilojoules. Now although it we ask the student to determine the net work done in kilojoules we should emphasize on the student that since the method is important he should he or she should calculate all intermediate answers and provide them. It is possible to finally write a big formula and nowadays calculators are very powerful you can write a 20 term formula and just one key at the end and you get the answer. The disadvantage in that is if there is any mistake anywhere you will just not notice that because the intermediate answers are not there you do not develop any feel for any answer. For example, you will get the final net work done but you would not get the feel for how much of that is the stirrer work, how much of that is the expansion work are both of them positive both of them negative or is one positive one negative and they are sort of cancelling out each other. Such questions will not be clear unless you do step by step. So we start off with the following for example we expect the student to provide a system diagram at this stage it is important to say that it is similar to the free body diagrams they have come across. We call it system diagrams here but in mechanics they have drawn by this stage time applied mechanics or solid mechanics a reasonable number of free body diagrams. In fact even in our fluid mechanics or heat transfer when we take that small element of dx by dy it is a small part of the system taken out and we have drawn a free body diagram showing stresses or flows or pressures around it. Then depending on the complexity this could be diagram or diagram similarly the process can be shown or must be shown on the requisite process diagrams that means this will be depiction of what happens in state space and usually a 2D projection it is sufficient at this time it is necessary to emphasize on the students that since thermodynamics has a number of variables we will usually be talking about pressure, volume, internal energy or enthalpy, entropy, drainage fraction what have you. Consequently when you talk of a 2D projection any pair out of this 7 or 8 properties is fair enough but one should tell them that if there is a expansion work involved it is usually PV diagram which is suitable and you should tell them that as we proceed you know sometime PV, sometime PT, sometime TS, sometimes HS, TV diagram is appropriate but one cannot restrict oneself to one particular diagram all the time it is not wrong to use just any XY but one should select the most suitable, most illustrative of those diagrams. Then we expect the student to do the analysis of the situation this would require assimilation of the information and mind you although I am listing these out one below the other things need not proceed in this fashion because unless we assimilate and understand what it is it may not be possible to sketch a part of the system diagram. Process diagram can be completed only perhaps as the solution progresses so at the end one should have all these things in some order it is possible that you expect some process diagram to begin with then as this situation progresses you realize that look it is significantly different my initial assumption was not right the real process diagram now should look like this assimilation then split into sub problems or steps and then proceed with solution this involves use appropriate laws governing equations of state it is important to make necessary assumptions which if possible one could justify but later on as we progress one should emphasize on them that there are certain good default assumptions in term which can be later on illustrated as we progress. Finally treat units and digits with respect actually this does not necessarily pertain to exercise 1.3 this will pertain to all exercises now let us come to exercise 1.3 proper coming back to our problem we have realize that there is stirring there is expansion so an imagination of the system could be a fluid in a cylinder piston type of arrangement and with a stirrer the moment you have show the interactions there is going to be W expansion there is going to be W stirrer since work done by the system is the positive direction we always show the work arrow going out of the system although we know that this could be positive or negative this will always be negative it is also a good idea because there are so many lines to show the emphasize the system boundaries by means of a dotted line out here it is obvious that this is our system but later on when we will have more complicated problems with more than one subsystems involved then it is better to show what exactly it is system A and system B by a set of appropriate dashed lines. So you have some substance though it says 5 kg let us write m equals 5 kg then what we have is there is a stirrer torque of whatever so when it comes to stirrer write down tau equal to 0.3 kg force meter omega is 1000 rpm and time is 24 hours for expansion we are given that there is a constant pressure of 4 kg force per centimeter square. So p is 4 kg force per centimeter square given constant initial volume 1 meter cube final volume 2 meter cube v1 is 1 meter cube v2 is 2 meter cube the process diagram or process diagrams if you want to sketch one would be for the expansion process one would be for the stirring process. Now in the expansion process this is pertaining to work of expansion this pertains to work of stirring remember work of expansion is of the type pdv both p and v are properties so work of expansion or the treatment can be exposed on a pv diagram we are given that the pressure is constant that is 4 kgf per centimeter square and initial volume 1 meter cube final volume 2 meter 1 to 2 meter cube since it is given to be constant let us show it as constant and then we say that since p equals constant this we can say implies that the process of expansion is quasi static similarly when it comes to the stirrer process it is minus tau d theta neither tau nor theta are properties of the system. So this will not be a state space this will be just a trace like a polygraphic trace something against time so when this thing happens let us show against time so the process takes from 0 hours to 24 hours and the tau is constant at 0.3 kilogram force per meter this is the tau which is constant and this is the speed which is also constant so on this diagram we are showing just tau and omega just as a function of time so notice that this is a process diagram this is just a time variation of the involved variables so it is a process diagram but it is not on a state space now we come to the next step and that is analyze the situation we have to determine total work but we know that the work is made up of two component there will be an expansion work component plus there will be a stirrer work component is the first step in analysis. The second step in analysis is the expansion work is written down as integral p dv from the initial state to the final state which becomes p into v2 minus v1 and here since p is constant then comes w stirrer will be integral initial state to final state minus tau d theta and this will be written down as minus tau omega and the total time over which it takes place again since tau is constant omega is also constant the formulation of the problem ends here after this it is only calculation taking care of units and as I said treat number of digits with respect now here one has to spend a reasonable amount of time to emphasize two things on to the students one is why is it that the calculators typically display between 8 and 12 digits but the teacher gets upset if you show all of those in your answer that is one thing and second one is there are units here which are kilogram force meter rpm hour centimeter finally we want the answer in kilo joules so they have an idea that look some conversion factors will have to be used for these dimensions and units will have to be converted but they do not really have a clear idea of how that is to be done so we have to emphasize on them something about conversion factor what is the conversion factor what is the numerical value of a conversion factor what does a conversion factor do convert some quantity from one unit to another unit when we use a conversion factor what is the what are the two things which are required when you use a conversion factor so to say convert say pressure from kilogram force per centimeter square to say bar are the dimensions changing dimensions of pressure will have to remain the dimensions of pressure is the value of pressure changing no but by using a conversion factor we are converting it from one set of units to another set of units since the dimension is not changing since the value is not changing the conversion factor should be a dimensionless number and the value of that number should be 1 now this is not very clear because usually we write conversion factors as 1 kilogram force is 9.81 Newton or 1 hour is 3600 seconds okay it is not clear to us that the it is dimensionless nor is it clear to us the value is 1 so as we proceed I will show to it how we should treat conversion factors and once you do that the students you will find that many many students lose a large number of marks because the conversion in between is not done properly okay and they are losing those marks unnecessarily their understanding may be perfect but their understanding of the nitty-gritty of using conversion factors is not right. So let us proceed now the next step is computation and let us do the computation of W expansion and I am going to use a long winded method just to emphasize the utility of conversion factors once they get used to it they can start using short forms W expansion we have decided is P into V2 minus V1 and now make it a habit that you write P in its full form P is given to be 4 kilogram force per centimeter square so write it as 4 and treat kilogram force per centimeter square at some as if it is 4a by b let this be say that assume this to be an algebraic symbol assume this to be another algebraic symbol square so let it be just 4a by b square let it be like that multiplied by V2 minus V1 that is 2 minus 1 it is meter cube meter cube so this is like something like C cube okay at this stage they can even proceed and say that this is going to be 4 into 2 minus 1 that is 1 so this is 4 what will be the units now the units will be do algebra kgf meter cube by centimeter square what we want is the final answer in kilojoules so this intermediate answer should also be in kilojoules you have to add two components of work so unless this is in kilojoule this is in kilojoule you cannot get this in kilojoule so it is a good idea to have both of these in kilojoules to begin with but this is not kilojoules what is kilojoule a kilojoule is kilo Newton per meter sorry kilo Newton into meter we have a meter here but we have something called meter square by centimeter square and we have a kilogram force and not Newton so at this stage we say we use conversion factor and we use two conversion factors here one to convert kilogram force into Newton and another is to convert meter square by centimeter square into nothing because it is the same dimension it is the same unit okay so they know that 1 kilogram force is 9.81 Newton but this is not in the standard conversion factor form I said conversion factor has to have value 1 dimension less like Reynolds number okay but at that time they are not used to Reynolds number but we are used to Reynolds number so convert this into conversion factor either as 1 by 9.81 kilogram force per Newton or 9.81 Newton per kilogram force this is a conversion factor this also is an equivalent conversion factor written the in the reciprocal both have the same value 1 both are dimension less since the value is 1 and the dimension is nil nothing happens if I multiply any quantity by any conversion factor nothing will change dimension will not change value will not change but of course there will be conversion factor of say meter per second divided by say light here per day but that is of no use here I want to convert kilogram force into Newton so maybe if I multiplied by this remember kgf and kgf are now considered to be algebraic symbols they can cancel out so this will be first used I will write this as 9.81 kilogram force sorry Newton per kilogram force so that would take care of kilogram force I should now multiply it by something which converts meter square by centimeter square into nothing so what is the conversion factor we know that 1 meter square is 10 raise to 4 centimeter square this is how they know the conversion factor but we should now insist that they should write this as 10 raise to 4 centimeter square by meter square or its reciprocal this is equivalent so multiply this by 10 raise to 4 centimeter square by meter square now are we able to cancel stuff out yes we are able to cancel out kgf and kgf we are able to cancel out centimeter square centimeter square and there is a meter cube here and a meter square here so this can be cancelled out this remains only meter so what remains is now 4 into 9.81 into 10 raise to 4 what remains here is Newton meter so if you are very fast ideas you should write this as Newton meter but what we want is kilojoule what is the link between kilojoule and Newton meter 1 kilojoule divided by 1000 Newton meter that is the conversion factor value 1 dimension nil so multiply this some students will laugh at you but that is good because they have understood what we are doing write this as 1 Newton meter is 10 raise to 3 sorry we want joule so 1 joule is 10 raise to 3 Newton meter 1 kilojoule so Newton meter cancels out and the answer without using the calculator as yet is 4 into 9.81 into 10 kilojoule take out your calculator 4 we have such a calculator even show it to the students 4 into 9.81 into 10 392.4 may be a good idea to write it as plus but that is a minor issue once they understand students will do it properly in no time but it is worth spending 5 to 10 minutes in the first few problems to emphasize what a conversion factor is and in fact we will find hardly any problem after this we will have such funny units like kilogram force per centimeter square kilojoule this has been included just to bring in the matter of conversion factor. Now our job is not over we have just evaluated the expansion part we have to evaluate the stirrer part so let us do that W stirrer we said is equal to minus tau omega t and what are the values given to us this minus size continues tau is 0.3 kilogram 4 meter into omega which is 1000 revolution per minute multiplied by t which is 24 hour. So if you expand it you are going to get minus 0.3 you can start converting from here but it is a good idea minus 0.3 10 raise to 24 into 10 raise to 3 let us see the units are going to be something funny kilogram force meter revolution hour per minute you need not combine them you can start conversion factor but nothing wrong if you take this route again you have to go to kilojoules kilojoules means this kilogram force will have to be converted into Newton once you go to Newton meter kilojoule is only a conversion factor of 10 raise to 3 revolution will have to be converted into radians and hour and minute will have to be taken care of. So this becomes equal to minus I can simply start multiplying it convert kilogram force into Newton again 9.81 Newton per kilogram force the one we have seen on the previous slide meter no objection to it revolution to radians it is 2 pi radians which will simply be dropped out per revolution we do not have to worry about radians it is just a name to a dimensionless unit of value 1 and hour and minute we know there are 60 minutes in an hour so 60 minutes per hour is the conversion factor now you will notice we do not have to worry about radians we have kilogram force kilogram force revolution canceling revolution hour canceling hour minute canceling minute. So we end up with Newton meter which is what we want radians we have to and of course multiplied by 10 raise to minus 3 kilojoule per Newton meter that is our final conversion. So what you will get now is minus 0.3 this 10 raise to minus 3 and 10 raise to 3 will cancel out multiplied by 24 multiplied by 9.81 multiplied by 2 pi multiplied by 60 kilojoule 0.3 multiplied by 24 multiplied by 9.81 I think I might have missed out that multiplied by 2 multiplied by pi multiplied by 60. Now at this stage students will write all this minus 26627.637 kilojoule what do you do if you write all this we should put a big red circle surrounding it and say all thus it tells me is that your calculator has an 8 digit display or if you write 12 digits all that it tells you is your calculator has a 12 digit display this is not proper why is it not proper because we are giving importance to unnecessary significant figures. Notice here 0.3 correct to 1 significant figure 24 may be 2 significant figures 9.81 3 significant figures 61 or 2 significant figures 2 and pi some ratio we do not have to worry about it significant. So no information here is better than 2 or 3 significant figure. So our answer cannot be better than 2 or 3 significant figures. So actually although it has so many digits we should write it down properly instead of this should write it may be only as minus 26630 kilojoule or better still because even this 3 has no significance we should write it as minus 26.63 4 significant figures multiplied by 10 raise to 3 and when you combine this with this answer this answer I will overlay it here. Now this is something into 10 raise to 3 this is nothing. So this should be converted for combining with this as equal to plus 0.3924 kilojoules into 10 raise to 3 right. So that 10 raise to 3 kilojoule or megajoule is common but here you only have 0.63 after the decimal point. So even these two are going to be of no consequence to us. See to it that even if it does this this 0.24 or this 2 4 are not added emphasize this this is not thermodynamics but this is good problem solving practice and good engineering practice because anyway we are teaching them engineering we are teaching them mechanical engineering. So they should respect that certain things are measurable and significant only to certain digits beyond that it is meaningless they will calculate the temperature rise of something as 3.6943594 degree Celsius but will be ever be able to measure beyond may be 0.01 Celsius and it is not worth talking about all that you are wasting time you are wasting paper you are wasting ink tell them that and I have found a neat weapon provide a quiz after this and significantly deduce marks if they do such mistake you have to do it once. Moment they realize that you know misbehavior like this gets heavily penalized they will automatically fall in line if they do not write units straight away give 0 marks without units what is the value you have to do it in one quiz and the student will not mind if there are a number of quizzes so that that small mistake does not really penalize them but the fact that the small penalty has been imposed is good enough. Now that brings us of course that last step I have not done I will leave it to you to combine these two you are mature enough to do it properly but any discussion on this yes sir page number 2 system diagram generally we are saying that the work input to the system considered to be a negative work done by the system is positive work given to the system is also surrounding to the system is also is negative here in the case of stirrer work work is coming out from the system right. So that is the when we show an arrow we always show an arrow in which the positive direction of work exist so we will show an arrow for the expansion work to be outside we will show an arrow for the stirrer work also going out of the system knowing fully well that as I said at that time that this could be positive or negative this will definitely be negative but knowing it is a negative work I will not put it inside because if I put it inside then I will have to change the sign here as negative and it is not good to here we know because it is a stirrer work but there will be some problems in which maybe some stirring some heating some interaction takes place and we are asked to determine what is the expansion work and what is the change in volume I have been issue I do not know whether the system is going to expand or contract. So I cannot put an arrow this way or that way it is always proper to put arrows in which the positive direction of work exist. So even if there are four components each one of them could be positive or negative show the four components are going out some of them will turn out to be algebraically positive that means positive work is being done if it is expansion the piston is moving out it is expanding if it is electrical and if it turns out to be negative we say that the cell or the electrolyte is getting charged rather than discharged but we know the stirrer work is a negative number but we will not use if we calculate the stirrer work and if it turns out to be positive then we know something is wrong somewhere either in the specification or in our computation. So and this is the symbolism we will generally be using till we come to cycles because in cycles we have a special treatment of heat absorbed and heat rejected heat rejected is a mandatory so that we will be showing in the wrong direction but otherwise till we come to cycles everything will be in the proper direction in which default arrow in the positive direction. So heat transfer to a system will always be shown inside even though it is negative work done by a system will be shown outside even though it is negative and it is a good question because in this case we know it is negative but in many cases we will not know whether it is positive or negative it is better to do the standard nomenclature because then this is plus, plus, plus, plus otherwise if it is stirrer then minus h t but then expansion we do not know positive or negative so what will you write plus or minus write the arrow both ways that is confusing. Any other question? Yes. Page number 3 sir. Page number 3 that 4 kg per centimeter square into meter cube like that so simply we will be introducing 9.81 Newton in place of kg it will be little bit easy to introduce. If your students understand that as 1 kg f is 9.81 that is okay but I find that this is a much better method for any complicated stuff this can be used. Okay sir. What you say is algebraically equivalent but that way you are not emphasize the basic fact that the value of any conversion factor is 1 and its dimensionless is nil. If I write it I wrote it first now we know that 1 kg f is 9.81 Newton but this is it is like saying 3a equals 6b does not they no special meaning comes out of it and I would like to emphasize the characteristic that the value of a conversion factor is 1 its dimension is nil and that is why this is the answer 4 kg f meter cube per centimeter square Yes sir. But the unit is not convenient otherwise mathematically it is a perfectly okay answer and what I am doing is I am just multiplying it by 1 multiplying it by 1 I am not changing the value because the numerical value is 1 I am not changing the dimension because the dimension is nil. A little bit it was lengthy process like Let the process be emphasized like this after that see once they understand it so long as they do correct conversion even if they do it in their mind it is okay what we want them is to do correct conversion because you know the correct answer has been obtained here while lose mark in writing it in the proper units and in thermodynamics we have not very complicated units when you go to heat transfer when you have to determine something like Grashof number or Rayleigh number there are so many units naturally nowadays most of the tables are in SI units so the convergence are only some powers of 10 but earlier we had the CP in some centigrade heat units or kilo calorie per kilogram Celsius something else in some other units viscosity in kilogram force units all sorts of conversion factors there. So do this as a habit if they continue with this nothing wrong but if somebody looks through this and start using shortcuts it is okay sir there in second slide it may be funny as far as the stirrer is concerned stirrer work is positive as far as the if we if we consider the sister stirrer as the system okay stirrer work is the positive agree it is doing work on something else yeah suppose if we tell the stirrer work on the system then it will be negative work done by this system of fluid on the the surrounding system which happens to be the stirrer is negative our system is what is shown by the dotted line so this is work done by our system this is also work done by our system this is also work done by our system this is work done by our system by the expansion mode on whatever is holding the piston on the other side or say on the piston and this is the work done by the system using the stirrer mode on the stirrer or whatever is managing the stirrer when we write this such an expression it is always the work done by the system all components would also be work done by the system different in fact your question is essentially the first question in some different phrasing anymore now I will stop here but let me discuss for you some other problems which I will leave to you as homework the first problem is algebraic it just as warm up to students so leave it like that the second one also is a straightforward third one we have done the fourth one is you know yesterday the discussion came up is when is the gravitational pressure gradient in a fluid significant this is an illustration where we have to determine a is actually hydrostatics integration of the gravitational pressure gradient to get the net force on the piston b calculate the work done by the water on the piston that is first part of b so this f will have to be multiplied by the dx the movement of the piston and integrated from x1 to x2 so this is where you cannot although there is a p0 and hence there is a p here on the piston you cannot just calculate as pdv we will have to calculate as the pressure converted into force because the force is varying and will keep on varying because as x changes the height will also change but once you do this if you consider the relation between h and x as the piston moves h reduces as x increases it will have to be integrated out so this is essentially pdv but in a much more complicated way now 1.5 okay I think I will spend some time on 1.5 you are given 250 gram block of a metal and the pressure on that is increased quasi statically and isothermally from 0 to 1000 bar assume that the density and isothermal bulk modulus of the metal remain almost constant at 20 gram per centimeter cube and 10 raise to 10 2 into 10 raise to 12 9 per centimeter square respectively determine the work done in June isothermal bulk modulus is defined as b equals minus v dp by dv at constant now here our system happens to be some block of metal and it is under pressure it is getting compressed because of that pressure and the pressure goes up from 0 to 1000 bar now if it were a fluid or a gas at 0 bar that means at very low pressure it will have a very large volume at 1000 bar it will have a much much smaller volume it will get very significantly compressed so if it were a gas at 0 bar it will have a very large volume at 1000 bar it will have a small volume so the process would be I have sketched it in the wrong direction but the process would be something like this it is mentioned that it is quasi static this will be for a fluid or for a gas but this is a metal which is a solid so the volume will hardly change it says that the density remains almost constant why does it does it say that the density remain constant or exactly constant then what would be the answer if the density remains constant mass is fixed that means volume is constant the volume does not change there is no work done so if there is some work done that means there has to be some change in volume however small and mind you were going from 0 bar up to 1000 bar which is quite a high pressure so even a small amount of change in volume would lead to some work interaction so but depiction of the process diagram would be something like this now I will show volume on the small scale and pressure on a large scale let us say this is 1000 and this is 0 in bar and this is say the initial volume I will draw a line indicating the initial volume and say if this is the initial volume state 1 state 2 will be only a small volume below state 1 this is state 2 v2 will be less than v1 but v2 minus v1 a negative number compression will be a very small number now we know that for a metal or for any fluid the volume will be a function of pressure acting on it and its temperature if it is compressible as you increase the pressure the volume will change we know also that metals expand so as you heat up volume will change so if you want to determine dv this will be there used to partial derivative this will be partial of v with respect to p at constant t dp plus partial of v with respect to t at constant p dp this is the variation because of change in pressure this is the variation because of change in temperature so we know that dw in this case there is only pressure so this will be dw expansion which will be equal to p dv which will be equal to p dv and for dv we substitute this this will be I will put p first p into partial of v with respect to p partial of p dv by dp at constant t dp plus p dv by dt at constant p dp okay I have just substituted that here now what are we given we are given that pressure changes from 0 to 1000 bar that is okay density remains almost constants at 20 gram per centimeter cube and the isothermal bulk modulus which is given as minus v dp by dv at constant t remains constant at this value so let us use this information and it is given that it is compressed quasi statically and isothermal quasi static let me call this as equation 1 quasi static means equation 1 can be written as equation 1 can be written as equation 1 can be integrated during the process at every stage we know what will be the pressure we know what will be the volume and we know what will be the temperature so integration is possible if it were non quasi static we would say the path is not known so we cannot integrate second one given is it is isothermal means during the process dt is 0 hence the last term in equation 1 is 0 dt is 0 now this implies that your dw it simply p dv by dt dv by dp at constant t dp and now we are given that the pressure changes from 0 to 1000 bar given that b which is equal to the definition you will find here minus v dp by dv at constant t is given and also we are told that it is almost constant so that means we want dv by dp at constant t so this implies that we know the value of dv by dp at constant t will be that will be equal to minus v by b so substitute that here you will get this to be minus v by b into p dp and hence w will be minus integral 1 to 2 1 is our 0 bar pressure and 2 is our 1000 bar pressure v by b p dp and now here remember that density is mass m per unit volume so this implies that v equals m by m by m by m by m by m by m by m by m by rho so this becomes minus 1 to 2 m by rho b p dp and now mass anyway is constant we are told that density and bulk modulus are almost constant so this factor can be taken out so this will become minus 1 to 2 sorry minus m by rho b integral 1 to 2 p dp which can straight away be integrated and then take care of the units and you will get here the importance is to emphasize the this almost constant part of b and almost constant part of rho that word in the bracket almost constant is important although it is in the brackets that is the most important word in this because if we emphasize that density is constant that means it is incompressible and if it is incompressible then volume does not change there will be no work done you compress it no work done for compression the pressure will just try volume does not change the remaining problems 6 and 7 are of a similar kind except that the variation of force with displacement is given. Now after this we come to the real main part of thermodynamics that is first law.


Okay, true though, you got me there I'm one of them niggas that they just Can't compare That competition have all the answers in it Still won't be fair What I got to offer to the rap game is Super Rare And that's why I'm gon' head To the top, with this hip In this hop, I won't flip Rock, I could go pop


The Montfort Point Marines have long been embedded in the concrete of Marine Corps history. The recognition they deserve for their sacrifices, though, has been a long time coming.  But, like all Marines, they overcame, proving themselves on both the battlefield and later in their civilian lives. Retired First Sergeant William McDowell is one of thousands who trained at the small, segregated North Carolina camp. I never saw so many raggedy, crazy, sweaty people in all my life in one spot. It was controlled mayhem. Seventy years after the first black recruit passed through the gates of Montfort Point, McDowell is accepting the Congressional Gold Medal on behalf of almost 19,000 Marines who trained there between 1942 and 1949. It's awesome. I never expected in my lifetime for anything like this to happen. About 400 of the Montfort Point Marines made the trip to attend the ceremony in Washington, D.C., bringing long due recognition to true trailblazers of civil rights and equality. These giants, the few, the proud, the Montfort Point Marines. From Washington, I'm Lance Corporal John Tupper.


Welcome to Windows 11 on touch. So this is my Surface Book 3, you saw me on dock this and I'm running Windows 11 which was an update through the Windows Insider program where I'm pretty quickly and smoothly but I wanted to show you some of the functionality of Windows 11 via touch. So I'm going to kind of zoom a little bit closer, get as tight as possible to this device. So we have of course our center dock right here. Now we can change this but I want to just keep it here for now and this is a beta so some things may not work too well. So the very first thing of course is you can see your Windows icon shows you pinned applications right there and then you've got your search which is kind of showing your recent apps as well as your search so you can actually go ahead and search. This is where the keyboard comes into play so if I tap on that that brings up the keyboard and I have the keyboard on the side or I can have it centered laid out. I do prefer the floating keyboard allows me to move it around the screen quite effectively and it works out pretty well. Plus you can swipe on this keyboard so you can go office and there you have it. So this keyboard is truly nice also has emojis and it has gifts so solid all around. Now your next button here is your desktop button which gives you the multiple apps that you have open and your specific desktop. So I have my gaming desktop which is strictly gaming you can see Master Chief there. I've got my main desktop here and I can go ahead and create a third desktop. So as I've created it I can press and hold. If I press and hold just give me the options to choose the background and rename. So I'm going to rename this one let's call it again this keyboard is pretty cool. Let's call this test video. So we've done that and then we can go ahead and change that background choose a background specifically for this desktop and you know I'm going to put this other Master Chief helmet and boom there we go. So we've got that and we can cycle through our different specific desktops as we choose. Now here we've got of course our new sidebar if you will this is like your news and information bar which you can bring up and close by tapping the button or you can swipe from the right left to right that brings that up and it's actually pretty nice so you don't have to swipe back you can swipe we can just tap on screen and it disappears. You can also swipe from the right and that brings up your notifications as well as your calendar here which is nice. Now after that of course we've got edge browser we've got Chrome which I do have on here I'm just going to close it's going to minimize Chrome down we've got Xbox we've got our file explorer and then we've got the store as well mail and then some other pin apps you can continue to pin apps as much as you want and you will begin to look like windows again you tap on the corner of your screen and that should minimize everything as well so that's nice. Couple of things to note on this kind of notification area on the lower right hand corner you do when you tap this this brings up this nice area where you've got quick access to your Wi-Fi network Bluetooth you've connected airplane mode battery it's much cleaner all together you've got to your volume rocker here and you've also you've got your brightness rocker so I can easily manage this by by simply bringing up this menu and of course my keyboard is next to that and I've got of course there's quick running applications there so that is the very first thing you notice surface wise on Windows 11 again it runs pretty well it feels like Windows 10 with upgrades but there's some more things to it that you can actually do so let's do the the multiple screen layouts so for instance you open up an application like let's take let's take edge here now with your if you had a mouse and keyboard you can just basically hover over the center icon here and make multiple windows the easier way to do it on touch is to press and hold down here actually grab it down here and snap to the side and now crew will create these four quadrant bubbles for you on touch that's the way it doesn't in touch and the first quadrant here I go okay what should I put here I'm gonna put the Xbox store it populates the next one I will put say my file explorer and then here you know what I will put chrome so I now have a four quadrant layout of all the applications I'm using all on touch very simple very easy and you know I can go ahead and basically either top each one to minimize it or I can of course kill everything from the edge if I can get there and it's very simple and very easy to use so nice layout overall I'm gonna switch now over to say my gaming desktop and I'm gonna basically do a video of gaming on Windows 11 so stay tuned on that this would be on the surface this would be on the surface book three so these there's some performance there with our device docked the way to actually set up the multi-screen is a bit different you can hover over applications that are of course Windows 11 applications or at least updated you've got this option to basically have multiple you know desktop layouts that you can pick from so you can switch to something that's a four quadrants you can do this larger smaller you can do you know three quadrant set up here which is what I just did and say we go into the file explorer we can do side by side and then we change that there so there's a couple of ways you can do it or again you can still go ahead and snap to the corner and then you can select where you want to put either application so I've got a three-quarter as well so very nice very different way of actually doing things all right so let's take a look at settings menu with touch on Windows 11 so settings is actually pinned here on your Windows start menu something as this beneficial tap you get into the settings now the settings menu feels a little bit different looks like they are it's a little bit more better animated much smoother also the icons look a little bit more visible and better representation than your traditional Windows look so you can go into this things like your display you've got brightness all that fun stuff head back you've got sound notifications actually setting those up so they are a bunch of menus here for Windows your power and battery which is really important especially for devices like this here's my power right now 23% battery levels better indication I do like what they are showing showing here so it's pretty nice screen sleep all that fun stuff and then you can go into your storage check out your storage amounts what you're using for storage again you can see is not that smooth just because this is still a beta this is the very first one activation multitasking and tasks switching some of the shortcuts you can use they record the Bluetooth and devices shares it's paired with the Xbox controller again better icons looks more visually appealing if I may say then you've got your network settings and it shows I'm connected to Thunder Network some other options or mobile hotspot if I need to if this device supports it personalizations of course which you can go you go into theming and also the colors dark mode those kind of things now that what is represented here how I got it but was simply by searching and it takes you right to dark mode your apps your default apps the accounts time and language gaming Xbox game bar captures in game mode now game mode is optimizing a PC for the best gaming experience so that is something that I think a lot of people would will definitely appreciate and then you've got your accessibility and then you've got your privacy and then Windows updates now Windows updates here you also have it just styled a bit better you have your pause and play so you can pause updates now you can also check your update history and the advanced options which allow you to get into deeper details for your updates give me updates download and media connections those kind of things and then of course there's a win side of Windows inside a program which I'm part of and anyone can join that allows you to go ahead and get those updates on a timely fashion so let me change screens head back to something much brighter here I think overall the functionality of Windows 11 really is solid I do like it I think a lot of people will will find it quite useful especially with devices such as this where touch is touch enabled and you're going to be using you know the screen quite a bit my favorite feature honestly is the keyboard right now I like the way it works I like the swipe works with it I also like the multi-tasking operations here on device and device now where it makes it really fast to snap to either corner of the screen and then you can basically start placing applications wherever you want to in whatever fashion you wish so that to me is pretty awesome so anyway guys if you have any questions or any comments about Windows 11 on touch or of course laptop or 2-in-1 or anything with a touch screen let me know don't forget to like share subscribe and always enjoy entertainment


Alrighty, let's play this in full first. Slide. Interesting. Okay, cool. So, first impression that I have here, it feels like that subtle overshoot is a bit wobbly. Given that she is so... I feel like there's a lot of tension in here. So there would be a little bit of maybe a little overshoot, but to me it feels like it could be just tighter, given that there's such energy and strength in this pose. I think it's just a bit too wobbly. The question is also, I'm assuming, so is this going to be a door where we don't... Like she enters like that. So it could be interesting to maybe... It has a slight feel of just being like a 2D card floating right to left. So it might be interesting to have a bit of a different pose. Maybe even that hand, the staff is higher. This could be bends, maybe slightly different head, or maybe the root is a bit higher. Then she lowers herself into this. Or actually I would probably not do that. That starts to feel a bit uncomfortable. It's almost like you want to have more of a streamlined leg pose there. Like stay in this. Although I would probably then shift the pivot, like have this side of the shoe all flat on the ground so you don't have this broken foot pose. So it's just a bit more on its side, if that makes sense. Then after that... This all works because you're moving forward. You might have to have a little bit of a root moving back, maybe back down, or back up, down over. Like right now in this position, how is she able to move forward? Because this leg is in front of her. So it's difficult to have this leg be the only thing that drives her forward. So it needs to be a little bit of a push off of this. But since you are fully extended, it's going to be tricky to get that.  And then you can even... What's the arm doing? You're going into the run. Maybe you can do a thing of also swinging this arm back. Really kind of drive that arm forward. So you can drive that leg forward with the push off to give this a bit more energy. And then it just comes up a bit later to get into this pose. But once you hear... She feels super slow motiony. If I play this 25%, 50%, twice the speed. See, double speed feels better. Obviously the whole thing is now double speed. But the get up and getting into this, given the energy, I mean you could almost have the whole shot double speed. Versus if you go back to normal speed, everything feels just a bit slow motiony now. So that would be that. We're also getting very far screen right here. Cutting this off where the question is, why? Are you potentially... Because I don't see anything in the email. It's mostly body mechanics. I don't see anything in terms of what's going to happen later. Out of something else is going to come in. Do we need that much room? Because there's another entrance of something or someone. If not, you might be better off just kind of panning with her. But then watch out. It's slightly the same size. Imagine we're then around here maybe, compositionally, and then we pop into this. It might not be enough of a change. It might just feel too much of a pop. But it could be worth a try. And then she does this. And I might just need a bit more context. I would start having some basic hand poses in there. There's just something when I look at this, it feels very arm-isolated. I don't see much if anything in the shoulders. Nothing in the chest. The chest and head feel a bit too locked together. This feels a bit better. And I would just like a quick fist pose there. And then it gets very... To me, it has a bit of a... Even though this is to the side, on the watch eye, it feels like an overextended arm here. It feels like it just goes straight up and then straight down. And I feel like this could be potentially a bit more complex. Either you twirl around the staff, she goes a bit more in the y-rotation of the body, and then plops down. But I don't know. You'll let me know what the intent is here besides body mechanics. I feel like this could be a bit more elaborate since we are on the close-up. But you could technically stay in this and just pan with her. No cut. And then you have room to do all kinds of body mechanics. Or if you do this, this is the moment where, if we're already cutting, are we going to do something bear with me? Or it's maybe more like this? Or... Even more. Even... More... Lambus bread. We're like that. And then it's just all about cha-cha! Well, you can't see her face then, but maybe you have to tilt down a little bit, but maybe this whole thing is more about the head. I mean, compositionally... Let me just bring this down so I can move it up. Maybe that would be then more in a more comfortable third somewhere around here. And even then she would still be somewhat low enough so we can still tilt down a bit. Just questions. I guess at this point it's more questions and critiques. What do you want to show off here? Would that be something cute to show off more of the face and intricacies in the arms and fingers? Or do you need it to be full body? And then if so, then why not just stay with the original camera and just pan with her to end up like this? I mean, we are looking a bit lower down on her versus here at more level. So, I don't know. Lots of questions. You let me know how you would like to proceed. Thanks. Alright. There's an email. You can sign up. You can start whenever you want. You can submit whenever you want. You get 16 submissions. Either way, a like and subscribe would be awesome. Alright? Thank you.


What terrifies me the most about all of this is that this could have been any of us. Welcome back to the channel, everybody. For those of you who are new around here, my name is Michael A.K.A. Dr. Cellini, and I am a board certified diagnostic and interventional radiologist in New Jersey. Okay, so by now you probably heard of Radan Devat, who is a former Vanderbilt nurse who was recently found guilty for criminally negligent homicide and gross neglect of an impaired adult in the death of a patient who was accidentally given the wrong meditation. She is now facing jail time for those charges somewhere in the range of three to six years. So this is a pretty groundbreaking case and a lot to unwrap. So let's go ahead and do a deep dive right now. Let's go. Okay, so by now you probably heard of the synopsis of what happened, but if you don't know anything about this case, let me do a quick run through of exactly what happened. This particular incident occurred at Vanderbilt Medical Center in December of 2017. Radan Devat, who was a former nurse at Vanderbilt Medical Center, was a help all nurse at that time. During the time of this particular accident, she was taken care of a patient by the name of Charlene Murphy. Charlene Murphy was being treated for a subdural hematoma or bleeding around the brain. Allegedly, Murphy's condition was improving at the time nurse Vought was taking care of her and she was going down for a routine PET stand. Now let's just pause there because I found this part very interesting for these reasons. One, why is somebody with a subdural hematoma going for a PET stand? That literally makes zero sense. Number two, why is patient Murphy having a PET stand as an inpatient? PET stands are almost exclusively for outpatients in her use for staging and workup of cancer, not brain bleeds. Anyways, back to the story. Prior to the PET stand that this patient was receiving, she was worried about being claustrophobic during the examination, so the physician on the case ordered VERSED or medazolam. This happens all the time in radiology and nuclear medicine if a patient is claustrophobic. The physician orders angelic or VERSED in this particular scenario so the patient can get through the case without moving or feeling claustrophobic. So whatever Don Duvaut do, well she went over to the PICSYS system or whatever the medicine vending machine is and looked up VERSED and couldn't find it. So instead she used the override function and found a similar drug that started with VE, but this wasn't VERSED, this was Vecuronium. Vecuronium happens to be a very powerful paralytic that's used during intubation. It literally paralyzes every single muscle in the body, including the diaphragm. Once she pulled out the Vecuronium from the system using the override feature, she drew it up and injected it into the patient. According to the allegations, VAUT ignored many red flags during this whole process and also failed to monitor the patient's vitals after the medication was given. Approximately 30 minutes after the medication was administered, the patient was found by patient transport to be unresponsive. A code was called and CPR was administered. The medication error was discovered at this time and was reported to the physician and the nurse manager. The CPR was in fact successful and they got return of spontaneous circulation or ROSC. But the fact that the patient has been without oxygen for the past 30 minutes due to paralysis, the patient suffered an anoxic brain injury and the family ultimately decided to put the patient on DNR and comfort care. The patient was removed from all of her life support devices and ultimately died shortly thereafter. Two Vanderbilt neurologists ultimately reported the cause of death from the subdural hematoma and not the medication error. Radan de VAUT reportedly had multiple conversations with risk management over the next few days and ultimately was fired. Of note here, Vanderbilt Medical Center decided not to report the medical error on the state or federal level, which is required by law. And speaking of Vanderbilt Medical Center, they also decided to settle out of the court system with Charlene Murphy's family for an undisclosed amount. This settlement happened somewhere in 2018 and required Charlene Murphy's family not to speak out publicly about the death or the medication error. Nobody knows the actual amount that Charlene Murphy's family was given, but I'm sure it was a nice chunk of change. Okay, so let's quickly summarize before we continue. Radan de VAUT administered an incorrect medication to Charlene Murphy, which ultimately resulted in her death in late 2017. Vanderbilt Medical Center allegedly covered up this whole thing and settled outside of the court with Charlene Murphy's family. And with all of this, Radan de VAUT was fired. And that's case closed. Well, not exactly. Here's where things get kind of interesting. Almost a year later, October of 2018 after everything was kind of taken care of, an anonymous tip was reported to the federal health officials about an unreported medical error. And after this, the Tennessee Health Department obviously found out about it and chose not to pursue further investigation or disciplinary actions on Ms. VAUT. About this time, the Vanderbilt Medical Center was investigated by the CMS or Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which ultimately resulted in a slap on the wrist. Now let's fast forward to February 2019. This is when Radan de VAUT was arrested and criminally indicted on the medication error that happened in 2017. And after a long COVID-delayed trial, she was found guilty on March 25th, 2022 of criminally negligent homicide and abuse on an impaired adult. Okay, so now that we know what happened here, let's discuss both sides. Because if you've followed anything about this case or been browsing social media about it, you've seen many different sides and many different opinions. Okay, so first and foremost here, a lot of people are arguing that Radan de VAUT was negligent and that the fact that she ignored all these red flags with this medication. All these red flags could have prevented this whole medical error from actually happening. So let's go through each of these red flags. First one, she couldn't find the Verset in the system so she had to override the system to be able to open the drawer and browse the medications. Two, she pulled out Vecuronium instead of Verset. Furthermore, on the Vecuronium bottle, it literally says paralyzing agent warning on the top of the actual vial itself. Three, Vecuronium is actually a powder that you have to reconstitute whereas Verset is a liquid, which you literally just drop and inject. There are not multiple steps in using it. And I'm willing to bet she's given Verset hundreds of times in her day, especially working in the radiology or nuclear medicine department. So these things just didn't click when she was going through it. And fourth, the patient should have also been monitored after giving a medication like Verset, Verset in this case, because if the patient was monitored, they would have known that there was respiratory depression and maybe they would have seen the vial that they actually had given the wrong medicine and could have reversed it with something like Zudamidex, which is a reversal agent that anesthesiologists use for this kind of paralytic. Another reason why people are on board with this case because they think it sets a good example for healthcare staff going forward. They think it may force healthcare workers to pay attention to the checklists and the policies in place to help prevent this in the future. And if they don't, they will be held personally liable or even prosecuted like in this case. Okay, so there are always two sides to every story. So let's look at the argument against this case and how the charges brought upon Miss Vaught are not good for healthcare system as a whole. First and foremost, even though we're down to Vaught, did everything wrong in terms of administering the wrong medication and all the red flags she ignored along the way, she actually did the right thing once she realized the error. She reported the error to the nurse manager, the physician, risk management and many other people along the way. And even though she reported to the appropriate people at her hospital, it was never actually reported to the authorities by Vanderbilt Medical Center. So she was transparent with her mistake but still charged with criminally negligent homicide which is usually reserved for healthcare workers who have intent behind their actions. Not in the realm of negligence caused by a mistake. Furthermore, one could argue now that with the results of this case, being transparent and reporting your mistakes could have severely negative consequences which may lead to under-reporting of mistakes in the future, which is something we don't need in healthcare. After all, why would you want to report a medical error no matter how big or small it is if you could be criminally prosecuted for it or even go to jail? This may actually go the complete opposite way of decreasing a culture of safety. And one thing I keep seeing over and over is that Redonda Vaught is a scapegoat throughout all of this. Vanderbilt clearly didn't pursue any legal actions against Vaught and even the family chose to forgive her and didn't pursue criminal charges. But all of a sudden, an anonymous tip comes about and these prosecutors jump on the case and ultimately turn it into a criminal trial. And you can't help but think, are there ulterior motives behind these prosecuting attorneys for doing this? It is a unique case and maybe it'll help them get their name out there for future endeavors or whatnot or maybe it'll help them advance in their career and be known as the attorney that prosecuted Redonda Vaught. It's a very high profile case and it may open up more doors in the future. It is interesting to see how this case was basically brought back to life after being completely handled almost a year prior. The next argument against this case is that Redonda Vaught already lost her nursing license which means she can't practice as a nurse ever again. What more do you want here? Is there actually a benefit to criminally processing her when she can't even practice again as it is? Like she literally doesn't have the ability to make that mistake again because she doesn't have a license. Criminally prosecuting her doesn't fix the problem that occurred or even set a precedent for new safety guidelines going forward. There just isn't a lot of reason behind prosecuting her. Her mistake already helped bring to light some of the issues at Vanderbilt Medical Center and because of this, those issues have already been rectified. So what does sending her to prison really do for anybody besides help the prosecuting attorneys win a case? The fourth argument I keep seeing is that this was clearly a systemic issue and not one person's fault. Yes, she was ultimately the one who pulled those medications and injected it, but there are a lot of questions about why she was even able to do so. Why was Vecuronium even in the medication drawer near a PET scanner? Like when do you use that down there? Why would you intubate a patient at the PET scanner? It's a really odd medication to have down there altogether. Why was she able to override the medication system to get Vecuronium instead of Verset? Why isn't there a two nurse system that helps verify high risk medications? Like there are a lot of hospitals. Why is the patient not monitored in the PET scanner after you give an angiolidic medicine? Why did Vanderbilt not report the incident to proper authorities? Why did they not get in trouble for not doing that? The point here is that there were a lot of people involved in this whole case and there's only one person being criminally processed and the others are completely scot-free. Okay, so what do I personally think about this case? For starters, I think this brings to light how the healthcare system is set up in a way that makes medical errors inevitable. As healthcare workers, especially nurses, we are incredibly overworked with limited resources and no support and we continue to be pushed upon our capabilities. Many nurses are being asked to take care of more patients outside of their comfort zone or what is considered safe. They're being forced to work longer hours and are being pushed to their limits. It's actually more shocking to me that more medical mistakes like this haven't happened. In the administrations that are allowing these unsafe environments for healthcare workers and patients will never have anything happen to them. But this nurse who made the mistake because of the system will get criminally charged and likely go to prison because of this. It doesn't make much sense. If anything comes from this case, it's basically just highlighting the flaws of our healthcare system. And rather than talking about how we can improve the healthcare system or prevent something like this from ever happening again, we are criminally charging one person and putting them in jail, which does literally nothing for anybody except maybe the prosecuting attorneys involved. We are essentially overlooking the bigger picture here. With this trial, we are essentially disincentivizing healthcare workers from coming forward with medical errors and quality improvement. After all, why would you come forward with a medical error if you could go to jail from that error? This does the exact opposite of making a patient safety a priority.  And I touched on this briefly, but it's also alarming that this one healthcare worker is the only person signaled out from all of this. Nobody else was responsible. They're putting all the blame from the systemic issue on the one nurse. And that's the scariest part of all. This literally could have been any of us. Furthermore, the pandemic has finally slowed and healthcare workers are exhausted. Nursing shortages continue. And how on earth do you expect to get more nurses when something like this happens? You think people are going to want to go into nursing knowing that they could go to jail for making one mistake? This really sets a terrible precedent for all healthcare workers going forward. I ultimately do not want to diminish what happened in this terrible tragedy. However, this nurse has no business being prosecuted for negligent homicide for a medical mistake. We are human. We do our best to prevent any and all mistakes we can, especially ones of this magnitude. The reason we have malpractice insurance is because we are human. We make mistakes, even when we don't want to. And what terrifies me the most about all of this is that this could have been any of us. And that officially concludes this video. Let me know in the comments below what you think of this case and about this video. I'm curious to see what you all think about this case. Keep it classy in the comments. Follow me on Instagram, TikTok, subscribe to my channel. And I'll see you all on the next one. Bye.


What's up everyone it's your girl Kenzie here from Layton Sports Cards and I am ripping 2022 Panini Immaculate football hobby six box full case break number 10 pick your team We've got Alvin S. Bucks Andy K. Patriots Armando B. Chargers Charles K. Washington Charles T. Bangles Cheng Fu H. Falcons David G. Lyons DeWard B. Giants Edward P with the Cowboys Ravens Dolphins and Jets Hilton T. Packers Jamie D. Panthers Jason S. Bears Jeff B. Vikings George M. Rams Joseph S. Broncos Justin B. Saints Costa K. Texans Lee Won Y. Niners Martin W. Raiders Matthew C. with the Cardinals Browns Nicholas T. Jags Rich S. Bills Robb C. Chief Scott C. Colts Sean F. Eagles Sean M. Titans Yuying F. Seahawks and Zach B. with the Steelers All right best of luck everyone here we go good luck my first look at iMac football I am so excited for this we're gonna pull a shield okay let's do it let's do it iMac time we've got a Davis Mills 80 of 99 we've got triple relic here 41 of 49 that is Joe Horn, Marquise Colston and Michael Thomas that's sick the card is not damaged that's just part of his cleat like his foot coming up in the picture have me for a second there 41 of 49 Saints player worn on the horn the other two are not from any game or event got dual relic 85 of 99 past and present Joe Namath and Zach Wilson that's pretty cool this next one is sick going to Yuying F we've got five of five triple relic for the Seahawks camp chancellor Richard Sherman and Earl Thomas the third the inner boom that's sick that's cool it's a really cool two of the uh Seahawks logos on the front there we'll mag this one for you wow this is sick too uh that it's five of 49 iBlack silver ink auto of trailance you go Niners we won Y on that one that's sick mag this lance too and true rpa here 55 of 99 Jalen Tolbert for the Cowboys you go boys Dallas that one is going to Edward P these three colored cops they're on the true we'll mag that one too yeah Lee wasn't joking any true rpa you're gonna get mad all right solid first box there we have 47 of 99 Justin Jefferson Vikings JT action there got another triple relic go into the chiefs this time 25 of 49 Christian Ikori Jamal Charles and Clyde Edwards Allaire Nigerian nightmare on the top of that one look how big he is compared to the other two guys on this card give them both of those next to each other and they're still not going to be as big as him that's hilarious nice sit there for the chiefs oh that's funny game worn on the Charles nice Ikori is player worn news and ceh is not from any specific game event that's sick got 17 of 17 jersey numbers josh allen for the bills on the four colored some nice patches coming out of here buffalo that's gonna be rich s nice one there on the four colored patch josh allen player worn news got modern marks 24 49 a j green for the Cardinals oh my gosh oh my gosh go get lane go get lane um Cardinals on this one uh you ready no it's just a big card who's got this team who's got him oh man and then it's a huge pc hit for this person too wow we've got a one of one Justin Herber huge Chargers fan too there you go on the shadow box one of one Herbie wow this is wow on card too and what is this next one nice too oh my gosh what is this case so far we've got eight of 99 true rpa Trayvon Walker there you go nick taking a chance with the Jags and it pays off there for you man wow what a box yeah that's what i'm saying one box in five bags yeah i told you yeah there you go nick heck yeah true rpa there back-to-back boxes with a true rpa oh that's disgusting the chiefs the chiefs the charles is game-worn christina koye just looks like a that's what i said so you can put both of those players next to each other and they're still not as good as him refrigerator perry refrigerator perry what is this uh what did brad call him the nigerian sensation or something like that oh that's crazy all right box three here yeah that was an insane box what a way to start yeah nice one here too how about a brady to 99 wow yeah i love it it's a huge pc card too we've got hollywood brown here to 99 for the uh carnal's marquise brown man that that low key hurt my throat you've got jumbo patch uh six of 49 marcus allen for the chiefs marcus allen that is player worn used material and what is this one of five patch sam howl for the commanders rl what's that a part of maybe it's cleats it's not like obviously a cleat but it doesn't look like it's part of a jersey that's cool commanders on that one to five or maybe shio means shoe that makes that would make more sense huh part of a shoe or is is cleat wow dude nick to 25 gold ink i black auto trevon walker wow welcome back to the sports side nick i guess football you said you've been buying a bunch of uh baseball welcome back to some football wow that's sick too rookie i black mag that one and horizontal rpa 97 of 99 trailing berks one of the last teams taken two there you go titans what a case shawna and there you go shawna mag that one too you got more magged cards than top loaded cards it's like that right oh wow are they saying it says top lot oh duh it says gloves right there what court it's a quarterback card unless it's a kenny picket i don't want to see a quarterback uh glove relic all right box four here and take from either one of kenny two gloves there all right right nick we've got a cmc that is 61 of 99 niners we've got a jersey number 31 of 88 cd lamp two colored patch there this is really sharp for being just a relic card wow this is beautiful we've got clearly immaculate patch one of 99 rookie of christian watson for the packers that's sick i really like that design of this card nice one there going back to the cheese heads we've got 41 of 99 donald driver oh my gosh marks of greatness talk about a little run here right hilton t that's sick but then how about right after on card signature moves auto eight of 15 bret farf wow back to back to back it's there packers hilton beautiful card oh mag this one jeez what is this case and horizontal rpa chris alave saints nice one there new orleans justin b wow on the three colored rpa they're very nice go pack go pack go pack go mag that one you want me to make the driver thing right oh yeah that's fine it's already in one my phone all right box five yeah this is this is crazy case yeah this is my first look at if i'm immaculate i don't know if i'm gonna be able to talk this going forward uh we have michael pippin jr 91 of 99 clearly immaculate patch here uh 5 and 99 de andre swifts do you swift their alliance got seven of 10 jumbo patch the standard uh corlan Sutton for the broncos that's sick this team literally went from no cards to like almost a personal what do we have here this is sick patch auto one of 75 mason crossby oh wow don't see that often that's sick wow it's usually like justin tucker if you're gonna do a kicker car that's sick nice one there packers we'll make that one we've got uh rookie eye black rpa to 99 damien pierce here you go texans nice hit there houston's uh koska k nice one there naga and this one too horizontal rpa jameson williams for the lions here you go detroit david g i was assuming everything's a magazine i need i need a sip of water give me one second here that's that's good no joshua yep there you go that's a nice hit all right last box let's see something crazy here not looking let me just make sure i get all the cards out all right give us a huge hit here uh jarvis landry uh one of 99 saints clearly immaculate patch uh 33 of 99 zack wilson jets with some hutch that would be sick i really like this design then we've got clearly immaculate uh christ uh sorry not christ mccaffrey george kittle 11 of 99 90ers fame jerseys 45 of 49 chris carter chris carter there player worn news material we've got eye black silver ink rpa seven of 99 wandale robinson for the giants wandale robinson and we're going out with a bang edward p killing this break we've got true rpa 96 of 99 garret wilson boom wow beautiful three colored patch there too garret wilson working the year i thought this was gonna be a sauce for a second yeah that's sick all right let's go ahead and do a recap on this it's literally a most more mag card i think there is more mag cards than uh all right wow what a break we had chris carter vikings um george kittle niners zack wilson jets courtland Sutton broncos um deandre swift lions christian watson packer cd lamb cowboys sam hall commanders marcus allen chiefs marquise brown cardinals josh allen bills the triple for the chiefs a duel for the jets a triple for the saints our non mag we had two two bottles that weren't magged a wandale robinson for the giants and an aj green for the cardinals this crazy all right we had um garret wilson true rpa to 99 jets the jamison williams uh horizontal rpa to 99 lions the demian pierce i black to 99 texans the mason crossby to 75 sick one there green bay uh donald driver to 49 packers we also had chris alave saints to 99 the bret far of signature moves to 15 packers titans trailing berks to 99 horizontal rpa to 25 travon walker on the gold ink there uh travon walker true rpa for the jacks then we had the true rpa jaylen tulbert cowboys um trailance to 49 on the silver ink i black the triple relic to five uh for the seahawks and then a one of one shadow box justin herbert insane break congrats to everyone again thank you all so much and we'll get these right out to you