All right. Welcome, everyone, to today's Google Webmaster Essential Office Hours Hangouts. My name is John Mueller. I'm a webmaster trends analyst here at Google in Switzerland. And part of what we do are these office hour hangouts with webmasters and publishers, anyone with any questions around web search and their websites. As always, if any of you want to get started with the first question, feel free to jump on in now. OK. I want to ask one. So all right, so we have pages on our website, which is kind of taking too much of time to load a specific part of the page. And it takes almost nine seconds and we have 10 seconds. So what we are thinking is something if we can block some of the resources from the page itself like some of the content is dynamic. But somehow, when I'm checking to block those specific scripts, so my page is rendered perfectly fine. So I mean, if we can kind of block those specific scripts for Google or for rendering purpose, so will it make any kind of difference in terms of page load time or anything and such? I kind of be careful with blocking scripts just for Google because then it might happen that we can't render the page properly, that we can't see the full layout properly. And the tricky part there is if we can't see the full layout properly, we don't know if the page is mobile friendly or not. So especially on mobile, you wouldn't have that kind of mobile boost because we don't know. Is it mobile friendly or is it not mobile friendly? We can't see the page properly. So that's kind of what I avoid doing there. Also with regards to speed, at the moment we differentiate between kind of reasonably OK, fast, and really, really slow. So something that takes multiple minutes to actually load a page, that's something we would say is probably pretty slow compared to the rest of the sites. With the change to mobile speed, we'll look at that a little bit more differentiated. But we use a number of factors with regards to speed there, including some factors that we see from Chrome, where we see what users are actually seeing. So just by blocking specific scripts to try to make the page look faster for Googlebot, probably won't necessarily change anything with regards to how we see the speed for your site. Instead, I try to see if there are ways to speed up the site in general for both users and for Google. Sure. The reasoning I'm asking is that, I mean, why are you checking in the Chrome that too? Basically, I'm just trying to block all those specific scripts. It's basically taking two seconds to load that one specific part of the script. And if I disable that one, then my page is rendering. It's fine, even in mobile as well as on desktop. So it's a kind of script also. You can say it's a back edit is working. When the whole the page is loaded, maybe at times it's like the other purpose, like the functionality purpose, so that is something the script is there. Yeah. Maybe there are ways to embed the script so that it loads after the page is actually rendered. Like something kind of like a delayed loading of that, especially if you just need it for functionality, then maybe that's fine. Like you wait for the page to load, and then you load that script. It's a bit hard to say without looking at the pages themselves. But those are some things that I would look at. Maybe there are ways to implement that. Sure. All right. Thank you, John. Sure. All right. Anything else from anyone else before we get started with all of the submitted questions? No? OK. Hi, John. All right. I have a question. The mobile index, the mobile speed now, is it a ranking signal for both desktop search and mobile search? It's only for mobile. Only for mobile. OK. And there's another question. When we search, we'll use the Google Page and Speed inside to check the web page loading speed. Most of the time it shows us that it has no data or data available for this page speed. It only shows the score. Now, for some of our websites, when we see the score, the score is very good. But when we use other tools to check the speed, we found that the web page loading speed is very bad. For other websites, it's vice versa. The page score is very bad, but loading speed is showing very good. So what Google actually takes into consideration? They take consideration of page speed score or loading speed time? We use a number of different metrics because, like you said, sometimes a page looks really good in one score and looks really bad in another score. So we try to take different measurements that we have and to combine them in a way that we think makes sense and gives us an overall view of the speed of the page itself. So if you're seeing that in one tool it looks good and the other one it looks bad, I would see why the other tool says that it's bad. Maybe there's something simple that you can change to really make sure that across the board, you're actually really good. OK, so my next question is because after when we get the message on Google, it must start to say that Google is going to take our mobile page loading speed as a ranking factor, we see that some of our research ranking for this is probably because of this update or something else. The mobile speed change, I think, is rolling out only in July. So it shouldn't be something that you would see already. OK, thank you. Sure. All right, yeah. Real quick, I heard someone just actually pass from this question a few minutes ago. And that was the gray versus the green URLs in the search results. Do you know what I'm referring to? No. OK, on some searches, a few people have noticed this. You'll see underneath the main title and link at the URL for the website. On a single results page, it'll have a mixture of green and some on gray and others. I didn't know if that was something that you guys were testing or if that was. Hopefully. I mean, that sounds like the type of thing that we would test, kind of the colors and the layouts, the size of individual text elements. That's something that we would test all the time to try to see what makes the search results a little bit easier to understand and easier for people to kind of process and find the right stuff. So I mean, I don't know this specific test what they're looking for or what they're doing there, but that sounds like the typical UI test that we do. It's like shift things around slightly, change the colors a little bit, and see what works, what doesn't work so well. OK, thank you. All right, let's see what we have submitted here. My website currently uses noindex and product pages with automated translations. Once the product is manually translated, our content team, by the content team, we then remove the noindex straight away. We are seeing Google taking months to reindex a page with manual translation, even though we have a dedicated XML sitemap to accelerate indexing. How can we accelerate the indexing of these pages? Do you think we're using noindex properly here? So this is definitely a good way to use noindex. If you have these products on your site in one language and you have translations in other languages and those translations aren't good yet, then using a noindex like this is perfectly fine. Depending on how you do your automated translations, it might also be the case that you could say, well, you'll just index the page without that block of automated translated text. Maybe we'll just put the title of the product itself and let the page get indexed like that. And then once you have the translation cleaned up, then you just add that to the page as well. That might be an option. But in general, kind of the mechanism of having a noindex on a page, fixing the page, and then removing the noindex from that page, that's perfectly fine. Sometimes that does take a while to get reprocessed. We have to recrawl those pages. And depending on the size of the site and what else we're crawling from that site, that can sometimes take a bit of time. But in general, that's kind of the normal crawling and indexing process. So that's not really something where I'd say anything is particularly going wrong. What I might look at in a case like this where you're seeing a really long time for content to get picked up again is to see if we're crawling a lot of unnecessary URLs. So if your shop is really small and you don't have a lot of products in there, then probably this is less of a problem. But if you have tens of thousands of products and you have millions of pages that can get crawled with all of these URL variations, then obviously if you have a cleaner URL structure, we'll just have to crawl maybe, I don't know, a couple of hundred thousand pages. And then we can get to these updated product pages a lot faster. So that's kind of what I would look at there. Does a 4.10 work any faster than a no index? To get an index again or? To get it removed from the index. To get it removed, it's about the same. So if you want to remove something, then a 4.10 or no index is about the same. 4.10 and no index are generally a little bit faster than a 404. But in practice, if you're looking at a period of a couple of weeks and you want to get this content removed, they're all about the same. Do I still need to add both versions to Search Console? So the dub-dub-dub and the non-dub-dub-dub version? Yes. At the moment, we recommend doing that just so that you have all of the data. We're currently looking into ways to make that process a little bit easier. So we'll probably ask around for input on Twitter or somewhere else to see what your ideas are there, where basically you just add your root of your website. And then we automatically include the dub-dub-dub, non-dub-dub-dub, HTTP, HTTPS versions in the same listing so that you have all of the data in one place. Maybe it would even make sense to include the subdomains there. I don't know. We'd probably like to get your feedback on that. So probably we'll ask around for more tips from your side in that regard. But at the moment, if you want to make sure you have all of the data, I definitely recommend adding all of those variations, even though it clutters things up a little bit. I know that sometimes it looks a bit messy. When trying to rank in the local map pack, how long should I expect this to happen for a new website? What are the most important factors there? I don't know how Google Maps does the ranking and their listings there. So I can't really help with that. The only thing I know is the Google My Business listing, and that's probably what you're already doing. If a website is already optimized for mobile, is it still advantageous to implement AMP? I think that can still make sense. So there are a number of features that require AMP to actually work well, where we can cash the content and deliver that directly in the search results. And these are things that we can't do with normal mobile-friendly websites, because for security reasons within a browser, we can't serve your content from Google.com Cash. So that's one of the reasons that might still make sense to you to use AMP. I would definitely try it out and think about where your website would be shown in search, where it might make sense for your content to actually be served with AMP. I know a lot of websites are already moving over to AMP-only setups, where basically they only serve an AMP version instead of a mobile version or a responsive version. So that might be another option to look at. But in general, just because something works well on mobile doesn't mean that AMP doesn't make sense. Ja? Yes? I have one question regarding that. I'm not specifically to AMP, but it's something about PWA. So Google recently said, like now Google support PWA for desktop as well. So is there something that we need to follow any specific guidelines, or we can just follow just as like for PWA to do what we are doing for the mobile site? So it will be OK? Or do we have to follow certain different implementations? Like, I mean, let's say it has to be kind of a combined set of clients and rendering as well as services and branding. So do we have to follow something else? Or like? No. So if you use a responsive design and use that for your PWA, that should just work. So there's nothing like a desktop PWA that you would have to set up. As long as the design works on desktop, which is usually the case where you have a responsive website, then that should just work. Should we read anything into the fact that we're seeing much better rankings on mobile than on desktop? I'm talking about a five-position difference, including on individual queries. I don't know. That sounds like a good thing in that where we're showing things a little bit higher on mobile for your site, I don't necessarily know where all of that would come from. It might be some mix of maybe local results, personalization, or I don't know. It's really hard to say. But in general, I wouldn't see that as a sign of you doing anything wrong. It sounds more like you're doing things pretty good for mobile. Has your team considered issuing general messages in Search Console like your site's content needs improvement or something about links if the links were problematic? We looked into something like, I don't know, a quality meter or something like that for sites for a while as well in Search Console. But in general, it's kind of tricky because the meter we would give for quality is essentially how relevant we think your site is in Search, which is essentially how we're already showing your site in Search. So kind of the current ranking and clicks and impression information we have in Search, it's essentially kind of trying to reflect how relevant we think that our site is. And it's sometimes really hard to bring kind of an artificial metric into Search Console to say your site is low quality or high quality or it needs improvement or it doesn't need improvement if we don't really use that same information in Search one-to-one. So it would feel a bit artificial to me in that we tell you why your site needs improvement in this regard, but actually in Search we look at something completely different. So that's kind of tricky, I think. I think of the case that I think of is where I've seen sites that they'll have 100,000 pages of blank pages that are indexed in addition to their site, which is like 20 pages, and they may not know that there's all that empty content on their site that's causing problems, I guess. I understand what you're saying, I guess, but I think about these certain cases, I guess. What do you call them? Stub pages, lots of stub pages. Yeah, I don't know. I think it's something that there is probably room to find some of these things that we can show to sites where we can say, well, this is perhaps a reason your site is not performing so well because you have way too many pages compared to the amount of content that you actually have or something like that. But it's hard to find that in a way that really kind of reflects what we think would have an impact on Search. And I think that's always tricky. I mean, that's the same problem that you have with different SEO tools where basically you get some information from this SEO tool, and you almost have to be an expert to understand what exactly this tool is looking at and what that actually means to kind of interpret, is this even relevant for me or not? Or is this just like busy work that I have to do? Does it actually change the search results for my site or not? But if you guys have any kind of ideas or recommendations in that regard, I'd love to hear about it. I mean, the Search Console team is working on the new Search Console. And if there are things that they could add to make it easier for you to create better websites, I think they'd be totally up for doing that. What's the best way to conduct site surveys if pop-ups are no longer allowed on mobile or exit surveys, acceptable? Essentially, what's important for us is that when a user comes to a site from the search results, that they see the content that they were kind of promised in the search results. That's kind of why we implemented this policy with regards to the pop-ups and interstitials, especially on mobile, where that's much more of a problem. What you do afterwards when the user has made it to your site is more up to you. So if someone clicks on a link within your site and you want to show a pop-up in between because it looks like, oh, they're engaging my site, then that's totally up to you. That's something that you could do. I don't know how exit surveys would work on mobile. Or scroll-based or time-based? Both scroll and time-based are also things that we would consider kind of blocking the initial view of the page. So that's something where I'd be kind of cautious, or at least set a really high threshold so that you're really sure that users have had a chance to actually see the content on the page. Two questions about structured data on mobile first. Indexing, how to add carousel markup for e-commerce category pages? I tried to add it on the Google guideline, but it only shows one URL. In the screenshot, the carousel has many URLs. How to make it? I don't know. I'd probably need to take a look at the page directly to see what is actually happening there. What I would recommend doing if you're still struggling with this is also posting in the Webmaster Health Forum. There are some people there that have a really good eye for structured data issues who can kind of guide you with regards to what you might need to change there in your markup. The current mobile site is an m.site. Should all content of the desktop site be the same as the mobile site? Yes, we recommend making sure that the content is the same, or at least the equivalent on the m.site as on the desktop site, especially with the shift to mobile-first indexing, we'll only index the m.site in that case. So if there is content on your desktop site that's not on the m.site, then we would completely miss out on that. And that includes things like structured data. So if you have the structured data only on the desktop site but not on the m.dot, then we would completely lose that when we switch over for mobile-first indexing. At the moment, our classifiers do try to recognize those situations and try to kind of save those sites for later. And maybe we can find a way to message those sites as well. But in general, it should really be the same on mobile as on desktop. If we change to a responsive design, what should we do in order to prevent a ranking drop? Should we 301 from all m.urals to desktop URLs or 301 to relative URLs? We did a blog post on shifting from m.dot to responsive design, I think, last year, late last year sometime. So I double-checked that. Redirecting is definitely a good idea because people might be going to your m.pages anyway, and it will be good to get them to the right version. We have two brands and a selection of websites, both subdomain-based and dedicated domains in the UK and similar format across Germany, which also essentially the same product. The difference is one is marketed for photographers, videographers, the other more for designers. The websites themselves also have the same structure and templates. How would Google deal with this? And should we be worried about content or structured issues with Google possibly demoting them? So generally speaking, if you have two websites and you have similar products, that's less of an issue. But once you have more than, say, a handful of websites that all have the same products, then it can happen that our algorithms or our web spam team looks at this and says, this is more like a collection of doorway pages, where essentially you have one product and you just have all of these different websites that list the same product in different variations. So that's kind of one thing I would watch out for there. The best way to avoid that from being a problem is to pick for each of these products, pick a canonical website and say, well, this product applies primarily to maybe photographers. So I'll set the canonical to the photographer website that we have. And this other product applies primarily to videographers. So I'll set the canonical to that one. In that case, you can still list the same product in both of these shops or in all of the shops if you have multiple shops. So users can go there and they can still buy it there. But in Search, we'll just index one of these, the canonical version. The advantage for you is also that we can combine all of the signals that we have into that canonical version, which usually makes that canonical version a little bit stronger in Search so that it's easier to find as well. So that's kind of what I would recommend doing there. Again, with two shops, I wouldn't be so worried if you're talking about more than a handful of shops, then I would definitely find a way to pick a canonical for these individual products. John? Yes. I have one question regarding the comment. We have a section on our website and in certain part of the content, we want to move it from one section to another. But the thing is, we don't have a provision or functionality to redirect those specific sections. So can it be done through canonicals? Or it will be fine? Or if you put the canonicals, Google can still crawl the previous pages and somehow try to run old URL instead of the new ones. We use a number of different factors to pick which URL to show. That includes redirects but also canonicals. So I think if everything else is aligned so that the internal links point to the new URLs and you have a rel canonical set to the new URLs, then probably we will shift over to the new URLs as well. You can also sometimes additionally add something like a JavaScript redirect to those pages. Sometimes that's easier to do. And when we see a JavaScript redirect, we also treat that as a normal redirect. So that would also tell us, hey, this new URL is the one that you actually need to index. Cool. That also can be done on sub-devates as well, instead of just by code. Thank you. Yeah. All right. And there's a question on Twitter. Someone is asking, is this an SEO trick? I don't know. It's hard to say what specifically you're pointing at there. I think it is definitely to this timestamp. Like, I mean, it says four days ago. But when you check on the page, it says like somewhere around 20 days ago or something like that's actual date. Oh, OK. Sometimes we pick up dates wrong. So that's something where I know the dates team is looking into cases like this. I can pass this on. But in general, we try to figure out what the date is that's relevant to the page and we try to show that. And it's more a matter of just showing it in a snippet than any SEO trick. So Hajjan, in that tweet, what I'm showing that, in the Google search results, it's showing that the page was updated four days ago. But that article is actually two years old. If you see the timestamp in that article. Yeah. I suspect we're seeing some other date somewhere else in the article. So maybe like we're accidentally picking up a comment date or something like that. I wouldn't assume that this is some kind of SEO trick that they're trying to do because it wouldn't really change anything from our side with regards to ranking anyway. It's just really just a snippet that we show there. But for end user, it's not a very good experience that we expect. If Google is saying that this article was updated four days ago, then we expect the latest articles. Sure. Yeah. That's totally I totally understand that. So that's something where if you run across things like this, you're welcome to submit feedback on the bottom of the search results. There's a feedback link to let us know about these kind of things. But it's sometimes tricky with dates because sometimes an article is updated and sometimes it's updated a lot later than it was originally published. And it's like, which date shall we show? The original date or the updated date? That's sometimes hard to say. But sometimes we also get the dates wrong. So that seems to be the case here. All right. We've had a website that given many attempts, we can't get the home page indexed. All other pages are indexed properly. It's currently excluded because submitted URL is not selected as canonical. We tried a whole bunch of things, including a different domain. Nothing worked. I looked at this briefly before the Hangout. And it does seem like something weird is happening there and that we're picking a different domain. Instead of the one that you have, from the domain name, it sounds like it might be related to your domain. But the domain name that we pick currently doesn't have any content. So it's kind of a weird situation that we would run into this. I need to double check with the team to see why we're picking that one. But if that other domain is also yours, then I would recommend just setting up a redirect rather than removing the content there. So kind of clearly guiding us towards a version that you want to actually have indexed. And especially if you're saying that you switched to a new domain and it didn't work, so we switched back, then maybe that's from that change that you did there. And if you switch domains like that, I'd really recommend setting up redirects so that we can find the actual version that you do want to have indexed. We have a multi-location brick and mortar store. We have a single website for various reasons that two locations have separate inventory. And we need separate e-commerce storefronts. We're trying to decide whether to link those stores directly from the home page, or if we should have a kind of a home page link to slash stores and then link to them from there. We seem to need to balance two competing interests. On the one hand, we want to get users to the relevant store with as few clicks as possible. And we don't want to bury products any deeper in the market. Hierarchy, then we have to. On the other hand, hierarchy may be clear to users on Googlebot with home page slash stores. So what should we do? What should we do? In general, both of these setups would work. So I don't see any big advantage in having the URLs like in separate subdirectories even further down. From our point of view, we don't count the slashes in the URLs. So if you put it into slash stores and then slash location, and that's how you want to kind of keep your website on your server, that's perfectly fine. What does matter for us a little bit is how easy it is to actually find the content there. So especially if your home page is generally the strongest page on your website, and from the home page, it takes multiple clicks to actually get to one of these stores, then that makes it a lot harder for us to understand that these stores are actually pretty important. On the other hand, if it's one click from the home page to one of these stores, then that tells us that these stores are probably pretty relevant and that probably we should be giving them a little bit of weight in the search results as well. So it's more a matter of how many links you have to click through to actually get to that content rather than what the URL structure itself looks like. So a flat architecture may be more beneficial than an acceptably long kind of pyramidal? Well, from just the URL itself, it doesn't matter either way, but with regards to making it easier to understand the context of these pages and how important they are, I think a flat architecture definitely tells us a little bit more. But it's still something where you have to be careful not to overdo it. So if you link to all of your pages from the home page, then they're all on there. So it's not something where you'd have much value from that. So you still need some structure, some context around those pages. But if you have a handful of pages that are really important for you, then that will be perfect to link from the home page. Or any of the important pages that you might have on your site. Yeah. What also makes a big difference for us is especially if the home page is really important for your website, is that newer content is also linked pretty high within the structure of your website, so maybe even on your home page. So what a lot of sites have is this sidebar where it's like new articles or new products or products that are on sale or something like that. Anything that you want to kind of push a little bit in the search results, that definitely helps us there as well. So if there's something new or something that changed on your website, and you think it's important, then make sure it's linked from the home page somehow. John, instead of linking from just for the home page, can we link it from other category pages as well? Like those are getting a lot of graphic from Search. So that would be OK. Or you just want us to link only link from the home page. I think that's perfectly fine to link to it from different locations. I mean, that's kind of the organic way that you set up a website. So I would totally do that. If it's something that's important for your website, then make sure that it's really obviously important within your website, so that regardless where Googlebot goes, they can see, well, this is really critical content. This is something I need to focus on right away. All right, cool. Thank you. All right, I still have Webmaster Tools for HTTP. Even though my site migrated about a year ago to HTTPS, occasionally I'll get messages via Webmaster Tools to HTTP that I won't receive on HTTPS. I even see things like spikes and indexed AMP pages on HTTP occasionally. Is there an issue with having both? Should I get rid of HTTP? Usually, we should be able to figure out that everything has moved to HTTPS. But like you're seeing here, sometimes we still see some signals that point at HTTP and will show some information there. So that's one of the reasons why I'd recommend making sure that you have both of these versions verified. And not having it verified in Search Console doesn't change anything with regards to how we associate information with your website. So I would definitely keep both of those verified in Search Console. I noticed when we got the message for the manual action that it only went to HTTP, but showed up in HTTPS. It went to the messages of HTTP, but showed up in both. And we resubmitted on HTTPS. And I'm wondering maybe I should also resubmit HTTP, because obviously, as we've discussed this thing, it seems like maybe there wasn't a reason for it at this point. And I obviously wanted to go away, because it's clearly having an effect. So I want to make sure I cover all bases. But also, I do see these oddities, like spike in AMP. So that's why I asked. For reconsideration requests, it doesn't matter. So internally, when we take a manual action from the website, it applies to both HTTP and HTTPS. What might be happening in a case like that is that when we send the message out, we only send it out to one of the sites in the account so that we don't overload your email with unnecessary messages that are essentially the same. So I know that there's some logic within Search Console to say, well, the webmaster just received this message anyway, so we shouldn't send the same thing again to the same account. We should still show that information on HTTP and HTTPS. So I think that's working OK. It's just the message that you receive. It might go to one or the other. I don't know if there's any priority set up with regards to this or not. With regards to the spike in index AMP pages, that seems a little bit weirder, but I could also see that that just occasionally happening, that we say, oh, we have these pages. We think they're associated with HTTP, so we'll show them there. And then we reprocess them, and we say, oh, actually, they're HTTPS, so we shift them back over there. My site is part of the ticket fly hack problem. OK, I don't know what the ticket fly hack problem is. I have a live music venue that lists the calendar. Right now, all ticket fly sites are down, so that customers see my calendar. I use GoDaddy's forwarding tools to send it to my Facebook event page. Right now, if you type in the site, it'll forward to the Facebook page. If you search for it on Google, it lists HTTPS. However, that listing takes you nowhere. I verified my site in Search Console. How can I get rid of the S in HTTPS when you search? That's always kind of tricky if you take down a site instead of kind of redirecting it somewhere else. So what I might look at there is to see if, through your hoster, you can also set up a redirect for the HTTPS version. If you can set up the redirect for the HTTP version, then usually doing that for HTTPS is possible as well. So I double-check with them to see if that is an option. And when that happens, then we can obviously pick that up. Without the redirect, we might assume that these are separate sites. So we see the HTTPS version that goes to, I don't know, maybe an empty page. And we see the HTTP version that redirects to your Facebook page. So we can definitely index your Facebook page. But we don't quite know what to do with the HTTPS version because it seems like maybe it's just temporarily broken. And by the time a user clicks on it, it'll be OK. We're not really sure. So I would definitely check with your hoster to see if you can set up a redirect for that as well. Usually, that's less of an issue. In the worst case, assuming that the site would otherwise be down for a longer period of time, what I would do in a case like this is move the DNS to a different hoster where you can set up a redirect. Because having that redirect to the page that actually has content for your website, I think that makes a big difference. Otherwise, what would probably happen is we would drop this page completely from our search results at some point. And then it's a matter of do we understand that this Facebook page has replaced your existing website, or is this Facebook page is something else that we happen to show in the search results somewhere further down? So if you can set up a redirect in any way, I would definitely try to aim to do that. To which level can we believe Search Console data, namely clicks and impressions? Mostly, it doesn't match our data in Google Analytics or Adobe Analytics. The data is actually pretty good. I think one tricky aspect there is that these different analytics tools, they measure in slightly different ways. So that's something where you might see differences. In general, though, especially when it comes to the impressions and the average ranking information that we have in Search Console, that's something that's actually pretty good and generally based on what we've seen users actually do. So in particular, the average position is based on the search results that we've actually seen. It's not something that's computed theoretically. It's really based on what users have seen in the search results. So sometimes you'll see differences in maybe a rank tracking tool that you're running on the side and Search Console. And usually, that's more a matter of the rank tracking tool seeing one version of the search results, whereas Search Console sees what users actually saw in the search results. I think there'll always be some differences across these different tracking tools with regards to clicks and impressions. To some extent, that's unavoidable. I know we do try to make it as accurate as possible. There are some things that we filter out in Search Console, particularly when we see that queries are only done maybe once or twice, then that's something we might filter out for privacy reasons. That's all listed in the Help Center. Usually, you can tell that this is happening when you look at the total count per query or for your site in general, and you look at the individual queries that we listed on the bottom, where maybe if you add up those individual queries, it comes to, I don't know, 500 impressions. And the number on top says 700 impressions, and that difference is kind of what we filtered out for privacy reasons. So that might also be something that's worth kind of taking into account and thinking about when you're comparing these metrics. I want to move some content of a French website to a new one. I'd also like to make a new website multilingual, manually translating the content into multiple languages. What's your advice to do this as clean as possible? So I think what you're doing is splitting an existing website and kind of taking part of that content and putting that on a different website. Yes. Yeah? Yeah. So I think the main thing that you need to be aware of there is that when you split a website or when you merge a website, it's a lot harder for us to process that compared to a normal site. So that's something where I would just kind of go with the expectation that it's going to take a bit of time for everything to settle down. And it's not absolutely clear what the final state will be. So if you split out some content from one website and you put it on a new website, does that mean that the new website will be getting just as many clicks and impressions as the old website got? Probably not. Probably there'll be a difference. If you're also adding new content to the new website, then you'll see differences anyway. But I think just from an expectations point of view, it's worth to keep in mind that this is not a trivial change for a larger website, at least. So you need to be a bit patient. With regards to what you need to do there is primarily to make sure that you have redirect setup for the individual pages from the old one to the new one, that with regards to internal linking on the old website and on the new website, you kind of have that covered as well. So for example, if someone linked to one of those pages internally within the website, then make sure that internal link points to the new website instead so that we really have all of the signals that tell us this content piece here moved to this website, and we should index it as this website. So I think that's kind of the primary thing from a technical point of view to do. To make the new website multilingual, I think that's something that's a great thing to do, in any case, and I would just make sure that you have hreflang set up properly for those pages. Usually, that's less complicated if you don't have a lot of different language versions. But in general, that's something that's kind of standard nowadays, like a lot of people have those kind of things set up. So I think this is a good move. You need to be patient. How much time do you think I would have to wait? How much time? I don't know how. Weeks, month? So I would assume that if you're doing a domain move from just one domain to another, you probably have that pretty settled down within maybe a week or two. If you're splitting a website, if you're merging a website, I would consider that probably more on the order of months. OK, thank you. All right.  Yes. OK, so I have some great problem which has happened to our website. So one page of our website is actually not Google is not able to kind of capture part of a content. And we have tried on checking in the fetches Google. So there it is showing fine. And I've also checked in the rendered HTML through the page speed tool. They have checked there. It is also there. But when I'm trying to copy fragment of the text and they're doing with a cycle in my URL and that particular text, so Google is not returning that particular my website URL itself. Or even though if I'm just not putting my website on just search strings or maybe the text strings also, so it is not appearing on the first page itself. So what might be the issues? I don't know. It's hard to say without looking at the pages themselves. So I think what you probably want to differentiate is what you kind of hinted at there is there are technical reasons for this maybe. So in particular, is the content actually in the static HTML? Or is it being filled in with JavaScript? Is it being pulled in with an iframe or some other method to at least figure out, is it that Google is not seeing this content, or is it just that Google doesn't want to show it in the search results? So in particular, sometimes we do have maybe some kind of spam filtering setup, or if you're searching for something that our systems think is obvious spam that's usually a sign that a site is hacked or something like that, then maybe we just won't show that in the search results. But if it's a matter of us not actually seeing the content at all, then it doesn't matter so much what you're searching, we just don't see that content. So kind of differentiating between, is there a technical reason why Google is not showing it? Or is there maybe some other quality reason why Google is not showing it? And if it's a more matter of a quality reason type thing, then that's something where I would just work on the website itself, and maybe think about, is this query really representative for what I want these pages to rank for? Yeah, so that's fine. But the question is like, I mean, it's OK if a website is not ranking, which is another thing. But maybe Google can actually kind of try to capture all this text and everything. Basically, the one part of the website page is getting crawled and everything. But the subsection of the page is not getting crawled, which is the kind of, I can say, I have just kind of consolidated it. A lot of topics are like, basically, into the one page. It's basically it's a one page. And somehow, Google only capturing certain section, not the rest of the section. And it is, yes, it is implemented in HTML, like the only P tag is there. So I don't know, like, I mean, what's wrong in that? Like, I mean. If it's in HTML and if it's a reasonably, I don't know, reasonably sized web page, then that's definitely more matter of a quality issue rather than anything technical. So I believe the limit for the HTML pages for indexing is something around 10 megabyte. And with 10 megabytes, it's like we can pretty much pick up any HTML web page. It really has to be really crazy long to actually kind of be not findable.  And initially, like, I mean, yeah, so the page. So looking at the query that you posted there, I would just use a shorter text to search. So when I cut it off about it half and use that with quotes, then that seems to be picked up. But it's something where I don't see that as being like so representative of us not actually being able to find the page. That seems, I don't know. And it's like, I don't worry so much about that. I think that we're able to index this page normally.  And they give up. OK. Yeah, I find it's better just to do a search on the title of the article, not including domain name. That tends to work better. And like John said, if it's really long, just use the first five to 10 words that tends to work better as well. So this one is like the very first paragraph of my page content. So that is the kind of problem we're facing, being your very first paragraph and just not get picked by Google. So maybe after that thing, maybe Google is not able to see my rest of the content. And that is covering a lot of different topics regarding different kind of topics often. Yeah. I mean, looking at the Cache page, we're definitely able to see the full content. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I don't think it's a matter of not seeing the full content. It's probably just our search results saying, oh, it's like you're searching for such a complicated query. It's hard for us to pull that together. We give up. So like you mentioned, like a name from the site and then maybe a title or first paragraph or first sentence, something short, but that's kind of what I would aim for there. Cool. Any more questions from any of you? Sure. Hi, John. Go ahead. Sorry. Go ahead. Thank you. Yeah. What's normally if I have set up your parameters, I'm going to set to no index to where certain parameters to that URL. And what's happening is our user will need to share those URL with those parameters. So I was wondering if Google will consider it is still treating those backbanging as a signal.  So in the URL parameter, a handling tool, you mean? Yeah. It's a handling tool. I don't know for sure how we would treat that. So in general, what would happen is when we see a link from one page to another page, we try to assign that link between the canonical versions of those pages. So that means kind of like, do we have a canonical page for that page that they're linking to or not? If we don't have a canonical page, then we kind of drop that link because we don't know from where to where it actually goes. But if we see that there's a canonical version that we can use, then we'll treat that as a link to that canonical version of the page. So what you can sometimes do is do an info query for the URL that you see people linking to. And you can see, does Google show any other URL in place of that URL? And if we do show a different URL there, then probably we're seating that URL as a canonical for the URL that you specified. So we would still be kind of be able to count that link between those two pages there. OK, thank you. OK, one of the previous questions someone asked was about a URL not appearing, the home page not appearing, and maybe an inner page appearing instead. And over the years, I'd seen kind of things that were clearly bugs. But in other cases, I wondered, are there cases where a page is over-optimized and whether through content or links, and that just causes it to disappear? Or is that just a kind of an open theory question? If you're searching explicitly for the home page, then we should be able to show that even if we think from a quality point of view, it's not a great page. So if you're searching for something like the brand name and some information from the home page, we should still be able to show that. On the other hand, if you're just searching for general information that could lead to that home page, then that could be a situation where we say, well, the home page is so keyword-stuffed. We don't know if these keywords are actually relevant on the page because it's just everywhere. But this lower-level product page perhaps seems more reasonable, so we'll show that one instead. That's something that I've seen happening quite a bit. But that we wouldn't show the home page when someone is clearly looking for the home page, that seems more like a bug. That seems like something that shouldn't really be happening. True, true. When they're searching for the brand specifically. But in the other case where it's just a generic kind of search, could that also be affected by, again, stuffing too many links, I guess? Some kind of thing? That could have. I mean, links is tricky because our algorithms probably try to look at that on a site level. And for the most part, when we see problematic links, we try to just drop them and ignore them. So they shouldn't have that kind of a negative effect on a page, on a page level. So maybe the dropping in and out is nothing. It's just, again, if it's five pages deep, that doesn't even matter, really. I guess kind of. Sometimes that happens. It's like they're just fluctuations. And sometimes they fluctuate so much that you get some impressions, and sometimes you don't get any impressions because maybe you're switched over a page or two below in the search results. And it's just fluctuating a little bit because our algorithms are kind of unsure how we should be treating this. Well, I don't know if anyone else has questions. I don't want to use up all the time, but I do have a few more questions. All right, go for it. OK, there was a particular project we worked on a couple of years ago where we built that section of a site in a space where all the content of every other site was just kind of generic articles. I want to call them eHow articles, but they weren't really useful to people. So we thought, hey, we could do this a lot better. And we built them out with a lot of supporting data and charts, very useful for people. And we noticed that over three years, that section of the site, which was maybe a couple hundred pages, it just continued to grow, even though we did not detect anyone sharing it or linking to it or anything like that. And we wondered if that was kind of normal behavior. By grow, you mean just get more visibility in search, more? Yeah, yeah, just traffic from search. And it was just a constant kind of trend line upward. And again, the competitors, they probably had a lot more established sites and whatnot. But I mean, was our content being rewarded? It sounds like it. Among these competitors. I mean, it sounds like you were doing the right thing there. I don't know which site this is or what was the specific situation there, but it does sound like our algorithms were picking up that this is actually pretty good content, and we should show it more in the search results, which sounds like it's doing the right thing. So we just built a calculator and it cost $5,000 because we thought it would be really useful to people, but it's not doing so well. And so we kind of wonder sometimes, OK, well, if you spend $1,000 on an article, then is it a lost cause kind of thing? So it's just kind of tough to gauge. Yeah, I think that's the kind of thing where you'd want to check with the audience instead of just looking at it from an SEO point of view and figure out maybe with user studies or something to see, is this really something that people are looking for or what are they looking for in addition to this, or what's kind of the next step or the previous step that leads them to the calculator or not. So I don't know, for example, if you have some kind of calculator for insurance stuff, then maybe kind of the additional information around everything insurance-related would be pretty useful, where people are maybe searching for do I need house insurance? And they kind of have all of this detailed information about house insurance. And then as a second step, they have that calculator. It's like, this is how you can calculate what it costs or what you need, those kind of things. So instead of just having a calculator on its own, having kind of the whole story that helps people to kind of cover the full path that they would need, that would probably make sense. But that's something you really need to check in with your audience instead of just looking at it from an SEO point of view, just saying, well, I could just put out 10 different articles that are kind of related to this, and that'll fix our SEO problem, you really want to make sure that you're covering something that people are actually needing, that where there's actually a hole. I know people are looking for the calculator. Kind of like on that previous example, where I mentioned about the content. It actually was an insurance type of thing. It was about automotive insurance trades. And the big companies didn't do a good job. But on the calculator, we know a lot of people are looking for these types of calculators. And the ones that are out there are very dated. They don't work very well on mobile and lots of other. Incomplete, I guess. Yeah. I think that's always a bit tricky when you have a tool that basically lets you enter numbers and you get numbers back. Because search engines, when they look at this page, they see a bunch of text fields. And the value is what happens after people put stuff in there and they can interpret what comes out of that. And that's sometimes hard for search engines to figure out without the completing information around that. The calculator is an example of the content. Like we'll do big articles and a huge amount of data mining to do interactive storytelling, that kind of thing. And it's really interesting. But it's also very time consuming and expensive to do these things. Yeah, I can imagine. Yeah. My second question is we had a site that used a domain that was keyword based. We, at some point, 301 did to a domain that was more of a brand term. And it seemed to have difficulty after that. And we say, well, maybe it was difficulty with 301. Maybe it was because the domain name changed. Could that have an effect, I guess? It's just the lack of, I mean, going from a keyword domain to a non-keyword domain? Usually that's a pretty small factor. So I would assume, for the most part, you wouldn't see a big change in search visibility, just from shifting from one domain to another. But it's hard to say what else happened during that time. So what we'll often see is that people make some change on their website and they see a drop in rankings and they think, oh, it's because of the change when actually we were making other changes in search, as well, and the site probably would have seen a change in search anyway. So that's really hard to kind of gauge there. The one kind of case where I have seen kind of site moves being trickier is when the new domain name has some kind of problematic history associated with it, where it just takes a little bit more time for us to really understand that the content currently on this domain is actually quite different than what it was in the past and it should be kind of evaluated on its new basis rather than what it was in the past. But usually those are situations where it's a very dramatic change where you can really see like you did this domain move and once the move was processed, like the visibility of this site disappeared completely. That might be because maybe that domain was hosting, I don't know, adult content in the past or really problematic spam and our algorithms are just like, oh, this domain is really problematic, we need to watch out for it and it takes a really long time for that to kind of settle down and get reprocessed. But if you're talking about something just like subtly dropping after a domain moved that seems like it wouldn't be related to the domain name. All right, so we're a bit over time. I think that's perfectly fine, but I need to head off to the next meeting. I'd like to thank you all for joining in. Thanks for all of the questions. Hopefully you found this useful and I'll be setting up the next Hangouts probably later today. So if anything else is on your mind, feel free to drop those questions in there and we can get that covered then. In the meantime, I wish you all a great time and if anything comes up along the way, feel free to ping us on Twitter or of course reach out to us in the Webmaster Health forums. Thank you everyone and have a great weekend. Thank you. Thank you, John. Thank you, John. Bye. Bye.


I think the order of the engineer ceremony really typifies the plan and the goals of the College of Engineering. To do your best, do it constantly, remember who your customers are, and also to remember where you came from. That there are others before you, there will be others after you, and to continue doing a good job for the profession. So I worked in the biomechanics laboratory sophomore year, and it ended up helping me get a job in industry related to what I want to do. So it was a great way to get involved on campus to learn a lot more outside of class, and then to get my foot in the door elsewhere. I'm going to change the world by making medical devices to save people's lives and improve quality of life. Well it's just really critical for engineers to understand the importance of the profession and the contributions that they can make and the responsibility that they have to take their knowledge and their skills and to do good with it. To be of highest integrity, to make sure that they're really thinking about the impact on the community, and that they're using their skills to just drive positive change for our community and throughout the whole world. Training that we have given them, I'm confident it is so good that they will overcome the obstacles and continue to contribute to society as engineers, you know, better transportation, better food supply, better energy, better water. The quality of the interaction of the R1 designated faculty that give them the knowledge, give them the understanding for them to conduct research that's relevant, that's impactful, that improves the quality of their education. They can be involved in cutting edge research, working in the lab. I had a lot of fun time during these four years. Fortunately I've got two offers. I had a difficult situation to choose one of them and finally I decided to go to Apple. We are going to investigate the mechanical properties of the display and the glass on iMac and iPad. Wonderful to see those fresh faces and the way that they're going out into the world now. Hopefully reinvigorated, recharged and committed to doing the best job they can for themselves and their public. Okay, we're done. Thank you.


Well, hello. Good morning. Good afternoon. Good evening. Whatever time it is that you're watching today's video There is no surprise that I'm in my car at 4.53 a.m.. On up my way to boot camp It is Monday that I'm filming today's video. So it is a boot camp day I actually just got back from Hawaii a few days ago on Friday So I have been in a whirlwind since I got back just trying to catch up I'm actually going on another trip here in a couple weeks I leave on November 1st to go to Texas for a conference So it is literally a spiral world when trying to get everything done I have to pre-film like I did for Hawaii So it has been so so so incredibly busy and today is another really busy day I have a few errands that I need to run I really haven't left my house other than to work out since I got back from Hawaii Because like I said, I've just been trying to play catch up. I guess that's part of working for yourself There's no one else to do the work and when you're on vacation. It's a catch-up time when you get home So that is what we're going to be doing today. My FabFit fun advent calendar that I ordered should be coming today I'm a subscriber to FabFitFun. I always unbox it with you guys just for fun And I ordered their advent calendar because it was really good last year So that'll come today. We'll unbox that so we're going to start our day off with moving our body Getting in some movement getting in some exercise. I always feel better after I work out It's hard. Don't get me wrong to get up at 4 a.m. And go work out. But once it's over, I'm done by 6 a.m I'm done in the morning and I just feel a lot better and working out in the morning Helps me stay on track because I don't want to get up at 4 a.m And go work out just to ruin it during the day the wrong food choices Let me know are you guys morning workout people and do you feel the same way? Do you feel like it kind of sets your day up for success? I definitely know that it does for me I did make my protein coffee this morning. I drink about half of it I'll finish that when I get home and I guess that's that for this morning So I'll see you guys a little bit later at breakfast at home I am ready for the day and as you can see I'm wearing my merch. This is my gents tribe merch I love the design of this. This is the comfort team on the back It says official member with the cute little heart love it super comfortable and you can see it's nice and long too I'm wearing it with some biker shorts, and it's the perfect length You guys have been loving the merch and said the quality is really good I have sweatshirts tank tops t-shirts, and I agree the quality is outstanding So I'll link my merch down below if you're interested in checking it out, but I'm hungry like super hungry So I'm going to make some breakfast I saw this real on tiktok about making a protein yogurt kind of bowl situation for breakfast So that's what we're gonna do today. So I'm going to use the chobani zero sugar and pumpkin spice You can use any yogurt. I'm just going to channel my pumpkin spice vibes today And then I'm actually going to mix in a scoop of the clean simple eats pumpkin pie protein So I'm going to get 11 grams of protein in the yogurt and another 20 grams in the protein powder And she said if you mix it in really well, it'll give you kind of a mousse consistency So we're gonna try that out. So the clean simple eats protein powder is 20 grams of protein 100 calories it is fantastic. I really like the pumpkin pie I do have a discount for clean simple eats I will link it down below for you And then I'm going to top it with some walnuts to get in some healthy fat And then for some crunch a little of this special k pumpkin spice cereal So here is my breakfast you guys this looks amazing Absolutely amazing and over 30 grams of protein So let's try this and see if it's as good as they say on TikTok All right, let's try this out. I will say it smells really good That's delicious. So by adding in the protein powder It gives even more pumpkin flavor and then we have the crunch of the walnuts Which is a good healthy fat the cereal I added that flavor god pumpkin Seasoning which is kind of sweet spicy. This is incredible I just finished breakfast and I actually just mixed up my motivate greens These guys right here. I have the peach. I absolutely love motivate greens I take this almost daily I take this whenever I feel like I'm not going to get in enough greens And I was thinking through the food that I'm going to be eating today And I don't have a lot of greens on the menu So I decided to go ahead and mix up my greens in my water It's a great way to get in water and it's a great way to get in your greens If you're missing it in your diet, I usually take the motivate greens I would say maybe three to four days per week Now you can buy the greens by themselves But what they have on their website, which is even a better deal Is what they called the digestive bundle and you're going to get the motivate greens You get to pick the flavor the detox light And you're going to get the apple cider vinegar gummies or capsules You can see I've made quite a dent in these I need to take apple cider vinegar gummies for today as well But you can get this whole bundle deal Normally it's $115, it's on sale for $99 And you can use my link for another 20% off That is a killer deal So $99 with an additional 20% off So like I said, you're going to get the motivate greens You get to choose the flavor either peach or tangerine The greens supply you with antioxidants, fruits, vegetables, fiber and enzymes All in one delicious drink It contains organic ingredients and never in the artificial dyes Colors, sweeteners or flavors The digestive enzyme and fiber blend helps your digestive system function at its best By absorbing all the key nutrients and promoting regularity So if you're someone that suffers with regularity The greens can definitely help And like I said, it just helps you get in your fruits and veggies for the day And then you also get the detox Now they have the regular detox or the detox light I've had quite a few people reach out to me and say Well, what's the difference between the detox or the light? Which one should I get? So the detox light is specifically designed to help you beat the bloat The detox formula provides a full body cleanse and digestive support It helps you reach your weight loss goals And support an overall health and wellness So the black bottle, the regular detox Is going to give you a stronger cleansing effect Where the detox light gives you a little less strong cleansing effect I've taken them both I like them both But I've really started to love the detox light It's something that I repurchase every month And you actually get to choose the regular detox Or the detox light as part of the bundle And lastly are the apple cider vinegar gummies I have been taking these now for a couple of months I think this is my third bottle I love these They taste really good And they are very, very effective You are going to take two every single day And they're cute They're shaped like little apples They're 60 gummies So it's a full month supply You can also choose the capsules If you don't want to use the gummies Apple cider vinegar is known for its ability to support Healthy digestion Boost metabolism and promote weight loss Not everybody loves the taste of apple cider vinegar So you can get it in either the capsule form Or the really yummy gummies The gummies as well as the capsule Provide a thousand milligrams per serving And the gummies are the highest quality With amazing flavor They have an apple flavor with a little bit of a taste Much less than if you just drink apple cider vinegar Even in water, not good This is a great way to reap all the rewards of apple cider vinegar That actually tastes good And again, you get to choose the gummies or the capsules So all three products in the digestive bundle for $99 And then use my link down below for another 20% off I use the apple cider vinegar's daily, the detox And then I use the Motivate Greens like I said A few times a week This is a killer killer deal So I had to share it with you guys These will help you promote a healthy digestive system Which automatically can lead to additional weight loss So check it out I'll make sure I link Motivate down below for you With that 20% discount Are you awake for the day? This is early for you Come on Are you awake? Yeah, you are Lola Do you guys need to have a morning treat? Yes Of course Of course we do Good morning pumpkin Good morning Lola Cheers I just made up my second coffee of the day I do have a couple errands to run And then we're going to take Lola to get her nails cut A little bit later this afternoon So I went ahead and made my coffee in my 24 ounce glass tumbler With a lid I bought these off of Amazon I'm not sure they're still available If they are, I'll link them down below for you And I had my homemade cold brew That I make in my cold brew pitcher Let me show you what cold brew I use So I use the Dreg Up cold brew What I have made right now is pumpkin AF I'm out of that And I have the cookies and cream I haven't tried this one yet But all the flavors I've tried have been so good So the next batch will be made with the drag up cookies and cream I tried a lot of cold brews Didn't like any of them This is the only one that I like I do have a discount for Dreg Up I'll link it and I'll also link my cold brew pitcher off of Amazon I can't tell you how much money Making my own cold brew at home has saved me You can see behind me That I'm currently cleaning my espresso machine It had the clean descale And I'm going to have a snack while I'm cleaning So I'm going to have a pretty simple snack I have 100 calorie pack of cashews And then I have this simply snack in meat stick This is teriyaki beef with pineapples These are really good Nice clean ingredients Grass fed 9 grams of protein 3 grams of sugar and 90 calories So not bad at all So this is my morning snack Lola, get Palmer Oh, get the baby Get the baby Get the baby from Palmer Get him Lola Palmer Tell me you got Yeah, hi Oh, you're so handsome You're so handsome And you got the baby Lola, here Lola Yeah, get him Lola Yeah, get him Get Palmer I know I love you You're so pretty girls We've got to get your nails cut today They're ridiculously long Yes, they are ridiculously long All right, we're in the car I actually left my coffee at home I am like in a hurry to get out the door I put my coffee in the fridge really quickly While I got everything together To go to the post office I have packages to mail and bills to mail So I made sure I had everything And then I walked out the door without my coffee So that's okay I'm only going to be gone about 10 minutes I'm quickly running to the post office To do, to mail out a few things And then I'm going to run back home Get Lola And we're going to take a little missy To get our nails cut We've been getting her nails cut At her oncologist office But she actually doesn't have to go back For a follow up for a couple months So we're going to have to take her For a nail trim in between They're so lovely there And they don't even charge me But there is a place in my community It's a five minute drive It's actually right by Fry's The grocery store that I shop at Called Wigs and Whiskers And the guy that owns it is this super huge Oh sorry Side-tracked by this cute dog Oh my gosh So cute He's so happy He's a little bandana Oh there you go You guys saw him in the background Anyways The guy that owns it is this huge guy Not fat but like buff, muscular guy He's probably like 6'3, 6'4 And he is just a beast of muscle And he loves Lola Whenever Lola comes in He is always excited to see her And sometimes he'll even pick her up And hold her while the tech cuts the nails And just love on her So it's cute She likes that place They love her there So we have to get her nails cut And then I think little Mr. Palmer Clayton It may get a bath today Troy was talking about giving Palmer a bath And he's so good in the bath Like such a good dog So if Troy gives him a bath I will film it and show you guys He's so cute There's times that he'll even go Over to the tub And pop his hands up Like he wants a bath So we're not mad That he doesn't get mad about taking a bath I also have a coaching call in about an hour So I want to get home before that I actually have two coaching calls back to back So we're going to make this a whirlwind trip To the post office And then we'll go grab Lola for that nail trim All right We're in the car Ready for nail trim I got a dog on my lap She couldn't be happier Looking out the window So we're going to take her quickly To wigs and whiskers I just realized when I got in the garage That there's blue all over the floor In the garage Apparently my windshield washer Fluid container And my car is leaking everywhere I still haven't done the brakes in this car Or had the brake light reset Alrighty Come on Let's go get your nails Lola Lola Come on You're sidetracked Come on, Meg Lola, come on Lola Come on Come on Lola No Uh-uh Come on There you go Come on No, that's the restaurant Yeah, that's the restaurant Come on Good girl You're really happy about this Come on This way It's here The Fat Fit Fun Advent Calendar I love to buy this every single year I bought this last year It was so, so good I don't know if you have to subscribe to Fat Fit Fun To actually buy the Advent Calendar I'll put all the information down below for you I am an annual member I love being an annual member Because I get to select everything that comes in my box Fat Fit Fun comes out four times a year So once a quarter So there's a fall, winter, spring and summer box It's always a really, really good deal Especially as an annual member You get to pick your own stuff So I got an email saying that their Advent Calendar was here And I had to get it Here's what it looks like It's huge So it's 12 days And it's everything from beauty to home to fashion It's every There's a little bit of everything And like I said, it was so, so, so good last year I'll link it down below for you All the pricing, the information But I thought we could unbox it together I've been dying for it to show up And it literally came like five minutes ago So let's start unboxing It's going to be a little cumbersome Since it's so big But we'll start with number, door number one Someone explained to me Why Advent calendars are so hard to get into I literally had to break out my scissors But I got into door number one And it looks like we have from Laneige Ooh, that's a great brand The Water Bank Billy Hyaluronic Cleansing Foam Ooh, so we have a facial cleanser From Laneige I love Laneige I use their sleeping mask Here is what it looks like And everything in here is full size And this is the Hyaluronic Cleansing Balm So it's going to be hydrating Which is perfect for me Perfect for the winter months Which makes perfect sense in an Advent Calendar Ooh, I'm excited for that Door number two is over here And it's probably going to be really hard to get into And we have something from the brand Grayson Stella I really like this brand I have their eye cream and it's so good This is the eye mask It's like an energy drink for your eyes So I don't know if this is just one eye mask Or several Oh, it's several Oh, wow So it's a package of several eye masks I use an eye mask A couple of times a week I especially in the winter To re-add the hydration under my eyes And like I said, I've used their eye cream From the Grayson Stella brand And really liked it Number three is this tiny, tiny door Ooh, we have milk makeup This is in the shade Work This is their cream blush I actually have this And I love it So it is a stick cream blush It's a really pretty shade Kind of a mauvey shade A very neutral color This is fantastic I love cream blush I wear cream blush every single day Door number four So this is fun We have some Glamnetic nails These are the press-on nails These are really pretty They're a pink kind of Frenchy looking tip And you get a full set I know this brand Glamnetic is really pricey Now I get my nails done So I'll probably pass these on But that's a fun addition Door number five is this huge one We've got bubble wrap It looks like something from the brand Laura Geller And this is the full face palette Party in a palette Ooh, this is fun We have a blush bronzer highlighter, I believe So here is what it looks like Oh, yeah, this is really pretty Oh, and there's eyeshadow It looks like two Okay So we have six eyeshadows A blush and a highlight This is really pretty For a neutral palette I've never tried a Laura Geller shadow Actually, I don't think I've ever tried anything From Laura Geller So I'm excited for this This would be fantastic for travel Because you have eyeshadows, blush, and a highlight Number six I love these This is from the brand Spongel And this is the peach and leachy ice So basically what this is Is it's a body scrubber With the soap already in it Super convenient I love these for travel Then I don't have to take a body wash And a scrubber, it's all in one And I'm actually going, as you know, On another trip here to Texas In about a week and a half So I'm immediately going to pop this In it to my suitcase These are just super convenient And really easy And there is a little string To hang it in your shower Number seven Oh, how fun We got some earrings Okay, I love that you get jewelry And lifestyle in here This is from the brand Maryland Shift And these are some studs These are so absolutely beautiful I've been actually thinking about Swapping out my stud In my second hole And these are really pretty So we have these two circles And these fun stars I love, love, love That we got some earrings Number eight Listen, we're going to pull this way We're going to pull this way Because these are hard to open This is from the brand Bioma Now I really, really like this brand And this is the Brightening Serum It says Try Ceramide Complex For Soother Boosted Barrier Serum I love, love, love their packaging I have their makeup cleansing balm And love it And I know that this is a pretty pricey brand So I'm excited to get some serum Number nine is the biggest door in the advent calendar Oh my gosh, okay I'm really excited for this Look at this headband I wear these to put my makeup on And sometimes I like them Just as a fun accent piece Look how pretty this is It's a black velvet with these gold sparkles This is so cute I have to try this I know that my hair's up, but This is so cute I mean, it's perfect for the holidays Number 10 So this says Dear Santa Define Good And this is the original coffee scrub How fun This is from the brand Frank Body This is really, really cute It's in Christmas packaging I can smell coffee Oh my gosh I actually almost bought a coffee scrub in Hawaii And it was so expensive I was like, no, I'm going to skip out So I'm super excited for this I exfoliate in the shower Two to three times a week So again, this immediately Making its way into my shower Number 11 Which is a good size door Oh, how fun are these We got Barefoot Dreams in this advent calendar That is such an expensive brand I literally owe nothing from it Because the blankets are well over $100 Their robes are a couple hundred dollars These fuzzy socks Oh my gosh, they're so soft I can't believe we got Barefoot Dreams in here These, I am so excited for these Even though I live in Arizona It does get cold overnight And I love a good fluffy sock When I'm working at my desk Or just watching TV Barefoot Dreams, you guys In the Fat Fit Fun Advent Calendar And then last but not least Day 12 Which typically is the biggest Most spectacular day It should be But that's not always the case Oh, this is a good one This is a good one From Amica I love the Amica brand It is a pricey brand at Sephora This is well over $40 I used to use their blonde hair mask all the time This is the Soul Food Nourishing Mask So this is a hair mask Not the blonde edition or the purple edition I am so excited for this I am almost out of my hair mask It smells so good Look at that It's so thick Their hair masks are incredible A little bit goes a long way And your hair just comes out silky and smooth And hydrated This is the Superfood So it's great for winter Oh my gosh I'm so excited I mean, literally these two items Pay for the Fat Fit Fun box I'm so excited This was really, really, really good Again, I'll link it down below If you're interested in Subscribing to Fat Fit Fun Or getting the Advent Calendar I'll put it all down below for you This was really, really good Okay, I'm going to make some lunch Before my next coaching call I have some shrimp That I'm going to cook up With some of this sesame Terry Aki sauce I'm just going to throw this shrimp in a pan And cook it up And I'm going to make a bowl Because I also have leftover quinoa From my meal prep So this is just tricolored quinoa I have leftover pinto beans from my meal prep And then I'm going to throw in some edamame This is the pre-shelled Ready to go edamame that I bought at Sprout So I'm going to throw this in the microwave Get this cooking Get the shrimp going And put together my bowl for lunch So here's my lunch I'm so excited for this So I have my shrimp I have four ounces of shrimp Third of a cup of cooked quinoa A quarter cup of pinto beans And a quarter cup of edamame I've drizzled some of that sesame Terry Aki sauce on top It's only 15 calories per tablespoon I have three tablespoons total And then some sesame seeds So this is going to be my protein pack Fiber-filled lunch It's time for an afternoon snack And I'm going to make kind of a snack plate Kind of So I'm going to do some crackers I actually bought these fiber gourmet crackers from Netrition These are amazing by the way The fiber gourmet flour Million out of 10 I use that in my meal prep Netrition is such a fantastic website I have a 10% discount for them I'll link it down below If you're interested in checking out the website I love it You can have eight of these crackers For 70 calories There is also 14 grams of fiber And three grams of protein And they're kind of similar to a water cracker I'll show you guys my little plate When I put it together They're so good So I'm going to have eight of those And then I'm going to have two slices Of the laughing cow cheese pepper jack And I'm going to spread that on my crackers I'm going to pop some raspberries on my plate And I'm going to have one of my little peanut butter No bake energy bites that I made in my meal prep So let me put together my afternoon snack plate I'll show it to you Give you points, calories, and macros So here's my little snack plate I've shown these plates a few times They come in a four pack on Amazon I'll link them for you I love, love, love them So I have my little energy bite My two wedges of laughing cow cheese Eight fiber gourmet crackers So this is what they look like Like I said, they're kind of like a water cracker They're actually really delicious I am definitely going to order some more on Netrition And then I have 60 grams of fresh raspberries Again, I'll link Netrition with 10% off And my little snack plate For dinner tonight, I am making a harvest chicken skillet With sweet potatoes and Brussels sprouts We're even adding in some bacon So let me show you what you'll need You're going to need a bacon of your choice Salt and pepper And onion Two Granny Smith apples About three cups of Brussels sprouts A couple of sweet potatoes Cinnamon Thyme Broth of your choice I'm using this veggie broth that I had in my fridge Minced garlic and chicken breast The first thing I am going to do Is peel and chop my sweet potatoes My apples and my onion So you're going to need a big skillet So I'm using my caraway skillet I love this thing It's amazing I'll link caraway down below for you They're expensive But they're really good quality cookware I did add a little bit of oil And then you would typically fry up your bacon first But since mine is fully cooked I just threw it in the microwave So I have my oil warming up I've chopped up my apple, red onion And my sweet potatoes So I'm going to add all of that to my skillet And then you're also going to add in your Brussels sprouts And we're going to allow all of our veggies To start to cook through I'm going to add in about a half of a cup of my broth And then pop the lid on my skillet To steam these veggies So my veggies are just about done They're nice and soft The Brussels sprouts still have a little bit of cooking to do But I'm going to remove the veggies from this skillet Put them back into the bowl Since we need to cook the chicken Now I'm going to add in a big scoop of minced garlic Let that become fragrant And then we're adding in our diced up chicken And we're going to season that with our salt and pepper Our cinnamon and our thyme And then you're going to allow your chicken To cook completely through Now we're going to go ahead and add back in our vegetables And allow it to cook for about another five to seven minutes All right, dinner is ready Palmer Clayton got a new toy If you hear him squeaking in the background I just added the crispy bacon right on top This looks amazing Such a great way to get in veggies Lots of protein Good complex carbs Let me go ahead and plate this up And I'll be back to share points, calories, and macros So here is my dinner This looks really, really good This is about a half of the serving The whole skillet only makes four servings I definitely can't eat that much in one sitting So I did about a half of the serving You can always go back for the rest of it Or just do half the points of the original recipe Make it into eight servings if you want Whatever your preference But all the information is here on the screen for you So it is dessert time It is the end of the night I am exhausted I'm going to take a shower Wash my hair It's hair washing day Put on a face mask Maybe use those eye masks that came in my fat fit Fun box And relax with Lola Watching some TV I have a night of day fiance to catch up on So for dessert I'm going to have this little guy I bought these at Sprouts, you guys These are really, really good These are the Cleo Greek yogurt bars This one has been pumpkin spice She's delicious If you love pumpkin spice It's very pumpkin-y Very spicy Nine grams of protein So I'm going to get in a good amount of protein And like I said Super, super good So this is dessert for tonight I'm going to go relax and enjoy the rest of my evening Thank you for joining me for today's What I Eat in a Day on WWU I hope you enjoyed coming along with me today Seeing all the good food, that amazing dinner recipe I will link Motivate and the Fat Fit Fund down below for you And if you enjoyed today's video Give it a big thumbs up Subscribe if you're not Turn your bell on Because I do what I eat in a day every Wednesday And I actually upload five videos every single week Down in the description box You'll also find my recipe website For tonight's dinner recipe Links and discounts to everything I shared with you today And of course come join my Facebook group We'd love to have you Happy Wednesday friends I'll see you in the next one Bye


Hello everyone, Myself Sampit Patil, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Walchand Institute of Technology, Sholapur. After looking at how to create an HTML page, we will go forward to how we can style and format an HTML page. So after this video, you will be able to recognize styling and formatting tags in HTML and you will be able to apply the same to a basic web page using HTML. So what is styling? When you have to display anything on a website or a web page, you need some styling to be done to make a website attractive. So setting the style in an HTML element can be done using the style attribute. So the basic syntax is the tag name which you are going to use. You have to use a style attribute and you have to give its property and value. So properties of the style attribute, there are many properties that can be applied to any tag in an HTML page. So we will see this. Now you know these basic tags that we have seen in last video. That is the HTML tag, the title tag, the head tag and the body tag. So anything that can be written or to be displayed on the web page is to be written in the body tag. So moving forward to styling. So now we want to give a background color. So we will start with the background colors or we want to give a background color to a web page. So what we will do is we will just say style, call the style attribute equal to double code. The attribute property name will be background color colon whatever color you want. The color you can give it in directly the color name for example say we will give blue and we will end it with semicolon so that you can give multiple properties to your styles. So I will save this, see the background color it changed to blue. Now this property value can be given in three ways either you can give directly the name of the color or you can give hashtag of that color. So hash let's say 0e, 0e, 0e I have no idea what this code color is. So see this is a type of dark gray color that we have given and the another is you can give in the form of RGB value that is just we will give black 255, 255 and 255 that are the parameters for the ratio of red, green and blue. So see this is the white if you do it 0, 0, 0 I will save it and I will refresh it. It will give you black color. So this was about background color to a web page after that if you want to I will just remove this style tag so the background color remains white and we can see other styling options. Now you have to change the color of this particular line which is styling and html page. I will just refresh you can see this styling and html page. So to this tag you can again call the style attribute equal to double code and you will say just color and the color will be will say I will give red and I will refresh it. So the color it changed to red. Accordingly I have told you that the html have predefined font sizes for h1 to h6 and the p tag which is used to write the paragraph on a html page or a web page. So you can also change the size of this particular line. So we will say font size colon now this can be given in two ways either you can define a pixel say will give 70 px that stands for 70 pixels we will save this. So it has increased by 70 pixels the another way is you can give percentage so percentage is with respect to the basic font style they have provided so it is 70 percent. So in this way you can change the font size of the predefined tags in the html after that we have another tag say alignment of the font or alignment of your content on an html page. So we have text align so this may have three parameters either you can give it left which is by default or right we will save it. So the text is moved to the right alignment and center. So the text is displayed in the center of your web page. So this is how you can align your html content using text align it has three parameters left right and center accordingly it will display your text on the subsequent size. So moving forward if you want to make the particular say html bold so you don't have to define it in the styling options you can directly define it like B you open the B tag you have that tag and you will close it. So now see what happens is okay we have we are using the header tag so it is already bold so I will just change this tag to a paragraph tag. Now see only html is bold and all other font style is normal that is not bold okay similarly I will just increase the font size to so that we will be able to read it properly. So we will say I will do it same 70px that is pixels okay see now html is bold I will just show you again I will remove this B tag and you will see the difference okay so html has again become in a normal font similarly if you want to make it italic we can use I you have to close all the tags properly see in this way another tag that is if you want to show the importance of that particular thing you can use the tag strong so it will also change your font to bold so we will just see what is the difference between B tag and the strong tag so I will just copy okay I will give a page break so using br we can give a break of line so there is no difference between using a B tag and a strong tag so now you can also define your font family so what type of font you want so basically before defining this particular thing we need to install the font required so we say we will use courier so in that way you can change the font of your content so other thing if you want to write a subscript or a superscript for your particular content so I will take another tag and we will see I will just put I want to write 2 4 raised to 2 so it should all look like the 2 should be above 4 so what I will do is I will just say SUP that is a superscript I will say 2 I will end the superscript I will just put this particular styling to the next paragraph tag as well we do not require the font family just the font color alignment and font size so see 4 raised to 2 so using the superscript tag that is SUP you can use this particular if you want to display any formulas on your website or a web page you can use this also if you want subscript you can use SUB so as 2 was displayed above 4 it will now be displayed below 4 as a subscript okay so moving forward I will just give you a task design a proper resume using an HTML so take a time so I just show you I have done this so see this is the particular page I have created for the background color I have used background color I will just show you the code you can check it out so see I have used padding I have used text alignment there are a number of properties that can be applied to a style attribute you can go through it online you will find different attributes according to your needs okay so this is how a web page has been created for a resume okay so these are some references that I have used and you can go through it for different properties for your styling thank you


Loom the quest landed today and within this video I want to guide you through how to get this weapon and hopefully how to get it done much quicker than the normal time it would take really. So the quest for this weapon starts within the same location the fawns started. So load into the truss lands upon the EDZ and make your way to the salt mines, basically head behind the church and follow the path I take on screen now if you don't know the way. And before we go any further guys if you do enjoy the video and would like to show your support you can by hitting that like button and if you are new around here and enjoy daily Destiny 2 videos be sure to subscribe. Also guys if you need help with Destiny no matter the platform you play on PC, Xbox or PS4 or just want to chat in general about the game join my discord which is linked within the video description. Ok so you will eventually come to this chest, open it and the quest for the Loom in the starts. At this stage you will obtain something called a system positioning device. This thing basically tells you where your chest will be. Mine as you can see was in Shaffer team within the EDZ, now as far as I know there are multiple of these chests that are scattered all over individual maps. If you are lost here simply search to go for the location your states, I am certain you will find it here. Now at this moment in time I don't know exactly how many chests there are so I can't be a good guide on where each one will be found. So once you have found your chest open it and the next step starts in which you have to generate 250 orbs, this you would imagine will be pretty long winded. But there are a few certain spots I have which will make this very easy and very quick for you indeed. Firstly make sure you are using a fully masterworked weapon. My pick is the Sunshot. This thing goes to work creating orbs. Now the fastest spot in creating orbs doing little work is Unnessus where the enemy faces up against each other. Yes this classic spot. Go here with the Sunshot and wait for this to happen. You will get this done in absolutely no time. If you don't want to wait head to Mars, spawn into the BroTech Futurescape area, load up the escalation protocol, get to work on the first wave of enemies and then run into the core terminus lost sector in the same area. If you have any exotic armor piece which gives you super energy back on hits make sure you use that. Hunter, Orpheus, Riggs, Bob's your uncle, simple and you will get this done relatively quickly. So in doing that you are rewarded the roles hand cannon. And this step requires you to restore its perks. To do this you have to complete a nightfall getting a score of 50k or above. This is simple people, using your nightfall score card aim for roughly 1.5 to 1.7 times. I use Voidburn, Airborne and Extinguish. Also using a strange terrain nightfall, it was relatively simple. So here you shouldn't have an issue. Next up you have to face the hordes by completing encounters either at the blind well, forges or the escalation protocol. Here I am here and everyone is saying tier 4 blind well is fastest. For doing this and everything beforehand you will get 7 points in total per completion. Meanwhile Palace Falt is an army forge was quicker though as you can do this forge super quick killing the boss in seconds and you get 4 points per run. Extinguish protocol could be quicker than both of them if you do have a lot of players in the area, but that's never a guarantee. And the third step is to defend the light by defeating multiple enemies without reloading. To be honest while doing the other two parts of this step you should get this done. I used the Crimson for the most part and got this done literally within minutes. So once you have done the three steps and restored the roles its perks, the next step is to complete activities. Wielding the roles while completing these activities gives you more progress. Here me and my teammates just loaded up the lake of shadows strike on EDZ. Doing this which you can literally get through in about 5 minutes even quicker, it gives you 12% a time meaning you will get this done in absolutely no time. The next step in my opinion is the hardest, it's the strength in number stage. Here you have to generate 50 orbs, that's easy and you can do this within the same locations I mentioned earlier. You then have to get final blows on guardians which I did in crucible, I believe it's 20 or together but teammates using hand cannons also give you percentage. I did this literally in one game but then you have to enter gambit and kill an invader before he kills any of your teammates. Here guys I suggest going into gambit prime as the enemy team invades way more than in standard gambit. I was lucky enough to come across a team who were on this exact same part of this quest so we were just helping each other out. Strangely enough though sometimes killing an invader at this step doesn't always work. What I found was if you earn the medal not on my watch this step completes. As you will see on screen now I killed an invader, this thing didn't proc. Then I did it and got this medal and then it worked. So I ain't sure what's going on here. I did the EDZ in order to I stated though people I just wanted to get that gambit part out of the way. So once you are done here people the next step is the final step of the quest and this is to enter the world of the thousands with roles equipped and you claim light by shooting crystals which are all over this strike. And during this in a fire team every member has to shoot 11 crystals each if they are doing this quest.  And there are loads of these crystals within this strike people you literally can't miss them and you can also only shoot them with the roles. So once you have 11 crystals each people in your team everybody's got them done go on and kills all. In doing this you are rewarded the Lumina Exotic Hand Cannon. Which to be honest guys I'm actually really enjoying the weapon feels great and snappy. I'm yet to use it in PvP though and test it out and see how it works I may just bring you another video on this thing and see what it can do so stay tuned for that. But yes guys this is how you get the Lumina Hand Cannon. I hope this guide helped you out in any slight way possible if it allows you to do a step quicker then my job is done. But on that note we have come to the end of the video people if you enjoyed the video leave a like who will help us out if you are new around here and enjoy daily destiny videos be sure to subscribe and if you never want to miss a video I upload you can turn notifications on by hitting that bell bottom but guys thanks as always stopping by hopefully you enjoyed the video and hopefully I will see you on that next one.