Dude my schedule is tough boys. My schedule is tough like so I stream at night I try to for your new booties anywhere from like 8 to 10 p.m. We start You know in a perfect world I get done at 2 but sometimes like 4 I sleep a little bit I wake up at 8 to watch my son Right I watch the Bay. He's a two-year-old now. I watch him till he goes to bed He goes to nap at like 1 30 now take and then I take my second sleep I'm a two sleep a day type of guy I do like two three four-hour sleeps a day. No, I played basketball. That's all I was never like a gym head type of person But I played more basketball for real So it's like what like it's hard to find time to do shit if I want to keep working and I feel like this Content grind bro if he doesn't do like that like if he if he didn't do that like three-hour nap in the middle Of the day are being shambles boys Are we serious?  I Swear to God I cannot block this like I swear everybody was open and I was just locked into playmaker See, I'm not I don't know that these guys have like three three five that can play like cover three cloud on outside.  You know what I mean? Like what am I supposed to do all right? Let's grow up man. Come on. Let's put the training wheels away Nope man milk man milk man Bro, we're in safe man. Like how does that ever an option on red zone threat? I need that caught That's like Brady just cannot make that bro, dude. I don't know why he can't throw that slant I have no idea why he can't throw that slant. No, I did why he can't throw that slant I just got like bro. He just oh sales that every time Football two for eight two for nine love. I love this game dude. I love it second favorite NFL team I don't really I don't really give a Think the Kelsey thing is cool like the Kelsey brothers. I think that's cool. Love Andy Reed. My homes is the man Bro, yeah, if them damn linemen would have blocked somebody would have been in business right there. I swear to God Like if the chiefs didn't have like my home's wife and his brother, they'd be like the coolest team in the league, right? I feel like that My home's brother and his wife kind of like even them out a little bit Right like I played a short pass for field goal right there like five seconds I played hard flats both sides man up shade up I put my linebacker in a yellow though I should have put him in a deep blue but I was thinking maybe you can snap those slant and call time out So I kept the yellow in the middle field rather than the deep blue I mean, that would have been cool If like I had somebody click onto but both my guys literally tackled that guy in the air like what are we doing, right? I Couldn't click on nobody it was just helpless I really started the thing like this route can be good in the red zone here My god, let me free form that for a touchdown. Yeah, let me free form that for a touchdown. Come on What am I asking too much? That's why you can't get rid of red zone threat boys Totties Bolivius to life behind you. I do that. I really do man. Oh, I just passly like are we That happens so much now. It's disgusting. I'll bet like dude I don't even know like what I can do about that Highball it like everything else in this game God underneath it's just wide I got a high ball that one too. I just knew if I high ball that one I would have got knocked out by the guy behind me. I didn't free form that one I just regular past lead. I don't be mad when it'd be like a free form that I know I can't do You know like one of them jobs quick snap so bad right now. So I'm nasty right now I'm getting like I'm just like so slow right now Fourth and 16.  Oh my god, yo scrambling is absolutely cooked It's absolutely irrelevant scrambling with the football you get just shedded so fast when you hit close to that line of scrimmage Oh, oh, yeah, once I got my field close remotely of a close remotely of a close


Hello. In this discussion we will discuss the discussion question of explain how accounting adjustments affect financial statements and provide an example of an adjustment that would impact the statements if not recorded. So this is going to be the adjusting process and saying what the adjusting process is and why are we doing the adjusting process and the simple answer to this is that it's going to affect all the accounts including assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses and the adjusting process is going to help us to get all those account types to be in their proper balances. In order to get more detail into an essay question such as this you do want to remember where we stand in terms of the adjusting process. What is the adjusting process might be useful to to put a brief summary of the adjusting process in. First of all, where does it line up in terms of the accounting process? We remember that the normal accounting cycle is going to have we're going to enter data including checks and bills and receipts of money, invoices. That's going to be the normal data input that we will have throughout the accounting period at the end of the time period then before we make the financial statements at the end of the month or year. We're going to have certain adjustments that we want to put into place to make sure that the timing is correct, that we have applied the correct revenue and expenses to the proper time periods and that's going to be of course what we're talking about here, the adjusting process. So remember that that adjusting process is something that isn't going to be necessarily correcting mistakes of the accounting department. We set up the accounting department to run in a particular way and there's just these some accounts that we just are going to put in as part of the system that need adjustments at the end of the time period. That's just going to be logistically the best way to merge the two worlds of having the most effective accounting data input and having the financial statements as correct as possible at the point in time that we create them at the cutoff date at the end of the month or the end of the year. So that means that we typically think of the income statement the revenue and expenses with the adjusting process because those are the timing accounts but of course the balance sheet will be affected as well as its liability and equity as we make these adjustments. In other words typically because they are adjusting entries and deal with timing we will normally have one balance sheet account and one income statement account at least meaning a balance sheet account will be impacted and so will an income statement account. In order to explain the process further we can choose any number of the examples and remember there's about six or so that are going to be just normal type of adjusting entries that we will have. We're going to have a supplies adjusting entry where we're going to count the supplies at the end of the time period and we're going to record expense related to the supplies that have been used and reduce the assets for the supplies. We have the equipment that's going to be on the books that we purchased and put on the books. We are going to depreciate that equipment and record the accumulated depreciation and the depreciation expense. If we take a look at these type of entries notice what they're doing increasing the expenses and that of course will decrease net income net income calculated as revenue minus expenses. On the other side they're actually decreasing the total assets so assets are going down net income is going down. Most of the adjusting entries are probably going to do this the two differences are if we adjust accounts receivable then we're typically saying something happened that an invoice went out after the cutoff date but the work was done before they cut off date and therefore we're going to have to bring that revenue back into the time period basically debiting accounts receivable and crediting revenue. That would increase revenue which would increase net income and it would increase accounts receivable which would increase total assets and the other example of an increase to net income would be the unearned revenue adjustment. Remember unearned revenue is kind of unusual so probably the most confusing for most people that are first learning this it doesn't it's not there for most for most businesses that don't have the type of industry in which they receive revenue or receive cash or some type of payment before they do the work but in those types of industries like a magazine distributor who receives subscription revenue before providing the subscription providing the magazines then we're just going to have the accounting department be set up so that they always record the cash as unearned revenue and then we'll make the adjustment at the end of the time period decreasing unearned revenue liability and increasing revenue a revenue account which of course would also increase the net income account. So the bottom line answer on these types of things we need to have the adjusting process to really be fully accurate notice that a lot of small businesses may not be doing all the adjusting entries at least not monthly they may be doing it yearly but if that's the case then we're probably going to have some distortions for these types of items that these adjustments aren't made and we're comparing things from month to month or we're not reporting something like depreciation which could be significant to the to the financial statements then they're not totally accurate for decision-making so in order to make them as accurate as possible we we would need to make these adjustments so that the financial statements are correct as of the end of the time period and that goes for basically all account types assets liability equity revenue and expenses. Note the one account not typically involved in the adjusting process that being cash something that's going to be involved all the time in most non-adjusting entry journal entries.


When far-right terrorists and traitors stormed the US capital and took it over for a short period of time It really showed to you how much The police are allowing right-wingers to get away with like they were basically allowed to take selfies In the Senate, you know just hang out chill in the offices of various members of Congress including Nancy Pelosi and They all got to go home Imagine that imagine being able to storm the capital Literally stage a coup and then still be home in time for dinner. Could you imagine what would happen if black lives matter tried to do this? Could you imagine? What would happen? They would be lucky if they landed in jail because that means that they would have survived because they all would have been shot because we know that police in America Treat black lives matter activists and black people and even left-wing causes entirely different Then they treat right-wingers. So in case you forgot this is how Black lives matter activists were treated back in 2020 after the murder of George Floyd when protests erupted across the country This is how the cops treated them You see police officers physically assaulting black lives matter protesters, but you might think well, you know what? That's just like in various cities. This is the capital. So capital police are different, right? They're gonna be more lenient. Well, no in actuality if any police in The country is going to be a lot more stringent in the way that they deal with protests You'd think that the capital would be the area where they take protests more seriously because this is our capital They have to protect the capital, right? So if you recall back in 2017 I think it was when the Republican Party was proposing their appeal of the Affordable Care Act and they were proposing cuts to Medicaid There were dozens of disabled activists that protested outside of Mitch McConnell's office. And can you guess what happened? Capital police did not clear a path for them to go through capital police didn't allow them to make their voices heard capital police Arrested them. Some of them were literally dragged out Off of their wheelchairs take a look Absolutely just stunning, you know if those protesters wanted to stay and make their voices heard and remain outside of Mitch McConnell's office now We know that all they needed to do was put on a MAGA hat And then they would have been allowed to stay by capital police Where was Where was this energy when they stormed the capital? Where was that energy? It's shocking and a lot of folks who protested at the capital Explain that capital police.  Adi Barkan tweeted out I was arrested by capital police for sitting peacefully eight times These rioters get escorted out to freedom Alexis Goldstein writes when protesters tried to take the capital steps during the cavat on nomination every single person was arrested But yet these folks got to go home Trump and Republicans called on them to go home and that was it you have folks literally Looting the capital building. I thought that the party of law and order was against Rioters and looters and they just get to go home. No jail time nothing Where was this restraint during the Black Lives Matter protests? This is how right-wingers are allowed to act Remember when armed thugs stormed the capital building in Michigan to protest the lockdown orders due to COVID-19 I mean look at the restraint that police officers exercised as armed thugs screamed in their faces and what we saw from the riots at the capital I mean, they were there were no different There were clashes with pro-trump terrorists and you know, some were tear-gassed But for the most part The individuals who literally tried to stage a coup of our government were not met with the ruthlessness that we saw During the Black Lives Matter protests. In fact, capital police Literally stood by as they watched far-right terrorists invade the capital building Can you imagine how they would act if Black Lives Matter protesters would be doing that? I'd imagine they wouldn't be standing idly by now if you're wondering Why are they letting them just do that? Why are they standing there? Why aren't they doing anything? Well this video from tiktok shows that they opened the gates for them. They welcomed them in Police are squabbling with protesters. Oh, there we go And it gets worse because one capital police officer even took a selfie with one of these terrorists So you invade the capital building and Capital police rather than dragging you out as they did disabled protesters and peaceful protesters Prior they take selfies with you. Are they arrested? Are they brutalized? Like Black Lives Matter protesters would be like I'm not calling for them to be brutalized Right peaceful protesters. I don't care if your right wing or left wing you should not be brutalized That's not what I'm advocating But what I'm saying here is we have to acknowledge the double standard. How often do we see peaceful protesters advocating for good causes? Arrested when leaving the capital building, but when you have a literal coup attempt well They don't arrest you they let you leave and sometimes they might hold your hand and help you out quite literally as we See from this video that was shared by Alexis Goldstein Literally being escorted out as she takes her time and he's helping her This is someone who just was part of a coup attempt and you see a capital police officer and riot gear Helping her so the question is why were capital police showing so much restraint? Why were they behaving in a way?  They get maced pepper sprayed brutalized. Why were capital police? Allowing this to happen Well as the New York Times reports inside the capital an officer pleaded with a man in a green backpack saying you guys just need To go outside when asked why they weren't expelling the protesters the officer said we've just got to let them do their thing now That is amazing So if you're a right-winger you could do anything you could literally storm the US capital and stage a coup and you could just leave They'll help you out That is insane to me When we just watched the video of Black Lives Matter protesters being sprayed from behind Getting pushed and kicked but try to stage a coup take over our government and our democratic regime and We just got to let them do their thing. They're just mad guys and it's not just the capital police who I'm Theorious at right now. It's public officials Ivanka Trump before deleting this tweet literally addressed them by calling them American patriots And when Trump tweeted out a video where he addressed them, of course, he was kissing their asses, too I know you're pain. I know you're hurt. We love you. You're very special Now contrast what he said there with the way he spoke about the protesters after George Floyd was murdered quote these thugs are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd and I won't let that happen just spoke to governor Tim Walls and told him that the military is with him all the way any Difficulty and we will assume control but when the looting starts the shooting starts. Thank you now in his message to fascists He didn't threaten to bring in the military or forcefully remove them He asked them politely to go home and If you're wondering why we had this double standard, well, I think that's pretty obvious We live in a white supremacist country where white outrage is always justified under every single circumstance But black outrage is never justified.  There's no amount of pain that would justify that kind of behavior It's just astonishing like this double standard should piss every single person off and You know the reason why we have this double standard is because in a lot of instances I'm generalizing but in a lot of instances if you ask a cop nine times out of ten They're gonna say they're a Republican or a Trump supporter not all of them But the overwhelming majority of them and that's a really big problem the fact that law enforcement in America is Right-wing and we have a right-wing party who is authoritarian that is a really big problem now capital police You know It's not like they're not capable of getting this crowd under control because if you'll remember last summer They used chemical weapons against peaceful protesters. I don't know if that was capital police and National Guard I don't know what the case was but they used chemical weapons Tear gas against peaceful protesters and they did this also Donald Trump could take a photo op so make no mistake about it The only reason why this happened is because capital police let it happen a privilege That would never ever be afforded to black lives matter protesters black people would never be allowed to behave this way at our nation's capital And as journalist Garrett Graff puts it I can't get over how thoroughly the capital police one of the nation's largest and best funded police forces failed today They're utter abdication of their most basic role hold control and secure the capital building Endangered every person inside from the vice president down to be clear This was a total strategic failure by capital police not a tactical one This wasn't like a couple protesters slipped in a side door that was accidentally unlocked rioters Stormed up the main capital steps and waltzed in and then just as appallingly waltzed out now Bill Kibbin responded to this saying having been routinely arrested by them at a completely peaceful utterly non-threatening Pre-announced protest with a 93 year old woman I can testify that they're capable of acting like jerks when they want to so in other words it happened because They let it happen So this is extremely like demoralizing and depressing to see I just don't know how as a country we move forward You can't work with a party and a base that is completely delusional and violent Being delusional in and of itself is an issue But being violent and delusional that is a very dangerous Very dangerous combination and that's what we saw take place and it's not gonna go away With Donald Trump. I'm worried that this is gonna take place at state capitals across the country at the inauguration and You know the FBI has been warning about far-right violence for years now, but it's been swept under the rug So maybe it's time that they actually pay attention because lawmakers were endangered today Lawmakers were in danger So if they don't take this seriously and start paying attention to far-right violence in this country and far-right terrorism, when will they? You could support the humanist report at patreon.com Slashed humanist report, but trust me I'd have way more supporters at patreon if that was my podcast sad


This is stock number 11244. We are here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. You're new and used heavy-duty truck headquarters today. We are checking out this super clean 2019 Chevy Silverado 2500 double cab short box This truck has a six liter v8 motor. It has been fully safety to and inspected by our service shop Has a fresh oil and filter change all the fluids have been checked and topped off And this truck is 100% ready to go graphite metallic is the color We shoot all of our videos in 1080p 60 frames per second So if you have HD capabilities on your computer tablet or smartphone device turn them on right now because it is definitely your best way To check out the quality and condition of the truck before seeing it in person And if you want to check out all the photos on this truck in the upper right-hand part of your screen is a link to our website Click that and check us out there comes with the factory painted alloy rims Goodyear Wrangler LT 275 65 R18 tires with right around half the tread left frame and under body is an excellent condition and this is a one-owner clean title history vehicle out of Pennsylvania so even though it says Alaskan on it is not from Alaska Front bumper is in the excellent shape. I didn't see any major denser dings than that It does have the factory fog lights projector lamp headlamps and the chrome trimmed grill The hood is in excellent shape as well I didn't see any dents or dings on there and the passenger side front fender is in really nice condition too Passengers side rim no scuffs or scrapes on there And as you go down this side of the truck take note of how clean the body is How reflective and mirror like that paint is You take these HD videos So if you are far away or even if you're close by and you just cannot make the trip down But you're still interested in purchasing the vehicle You can see the truck hear the truck and of confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before you even get here So this is an Alaskan edition Those are just decals on there. So if you didn't like them you could always remove them But the Alaskan edition does come with those decals and In the upper right hand part of the screen, you'll notice a link to our website. That's the summit auto fast pass option We offer that because we do all the videos and everything. So if you want to Get the truck and make it yours before you even get here Click that link back rim is in excellent shape back tires are A little bit more tread than the front tires I'd say probably 50 to 60 percent on those and the frame and underbody is in really nice condition And it's like that all the way underneath black painted step bars So yeah, we do that fast pass option. So you can get everything done So when you get here, all you have to do is drive the truck love it and you'll be all set to go Rear bumper is in great shape no denser dings and that and it does have the rear bumper steps Tailgate is in nice condition as well. It is a locking tailgate And it has these shock down assist comes with the spray and bed liner That's in really nice shape that tailgate shuts nice and solidly Down the driver side just as clean as that passenger side No major dense or dings On the box here And for full disclosure this back rim is in nice shape as well And as you go down the rest of the side of the truck looks really good It does have the capitalist fuel fill Which is a nice feature You do get the telescopic tow mirrors with the built-in directional signals the led side lights These telescopes out like that and fold in And i'll show you how to turn those lights on today turn on with the Cargo lamps Driver seat is in excellent condition. No rips or tears on there Does have the power driver seat We have some floor mats in here. It also has the heavy-duty rubber floor Auto headlamps turned out four-wheel drive Factory brake controller. It also has the tilt and telescopic steering wheel power windows power locks and power mirrors And as we hop inside the vehicle here Turn it on so you can see just how many miles and stuff are on this vehicle This one has 15 206 miles instrument cluster is very nice and clean You get the leather wrapped steering wheel Bluetooth and information center controls on the right cruise controls on the left It does have audio controls on the back of the steering wheel You get the six speed automatic transmission with the optional tap shift And then this one has the am fm and serious xm radio on the chevy my link system Um, you also have your projection manager so you can project your cell phone to the screen So if you've got a navigation program on there such as ways or google maps Projected to the screen and then you have navigation on your screen. So that's a pretty cool system right there This is also where your backup camera shows up. I'll show you then just a second cd player dual climate control Stability control and that's your cargo lamps. We'll turn those on so you can see those side lights Up here. You have the on-star capabilities as well as the Um button up here and that indicates that you have the snow plow prep package on this truck The headliner is in really nice condition and the passenger side seat Is in excellent shape as well. No rips or tears on that This one does have the 40 20 40 split bench seating So uh, you can actually have six passengers In this vehicle The back seats are just as clean as the front seats. No rips or tears back here It does have the latch child safety system for any child car seat needs Fixed glass rear window with the defrost these seats do fold up for extra storage And there is another floor mat back here and the floors do look really good as well This one does have side curtain airbags And uh, we'll start it up and take a quick look under the hood and see it starts up real nice No warning lights or anything like that Except that the hood's open Those led side lights they are super bright Nice feature And I would personally like to thank you for checking out the video today and hopefully from this hd video You will have been able to tell just how clean this truck is all the way around inside now Under the hood. We have the six liter v8 motor and jambé is very clean Runs very smooth Once again, this truck has been fully safe needed and inspected by our service shop has a fresh oil and filter change All the fluids have been checked and topped off And this truck is 100 ready to go See more pictures of this truck or one of our other 450 new and used cars, trucks, scvs, minivans, wranglers, half tons, three quarter tons, one tons You name it, we got it from our website www.summitauto.com Full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle from two locations all at summitauto.com And if you'd like to check out more hd videos you can go to youtube.com slash summit auto Remember to like subscribe and share on this video and all the videos that you see there In fact, in a second you will see a link to subscribe to our youtube channel on your left It links more Chevy 2500 truck videos like this one on right if you have not been to our website On the bottom link to this vehicle on our website click those check us out And we really look forward to helping with this super clean 2019 Chevy Silverado 2500 double cab shore box With the LT1 and Alaska Alaskan edition in graphite metallic. Thanks again for checking out the video


The next talk will be about a new variant of PMAC beyond the birthday bound by Kanya Suda. Thank you. So this sentence pretty much summarizes what this work is all about. This work provides you a new block-style for model operation, which is based on the previous construction called PMAC. And the new model operation is highly secured and highly efficient. So in the following, the rest of this talk, I'll explain what this sentence really means. So first, I'll give you a brief introduction to MAC. Then I'll talk about work-cypher-based model operation for message authentication codes focusing on PMAC. Then I'll describe what I mean by highly secure. And here, highly secure means that construction achieves security beyond the birthday bound. So I'll talk about birthday bound problems and the security levels higher than that. And lastly, I'll describe what I mean by highly efficient by describing the construction itself and details. And I'll try to persuade you that it's actually efficient. And lastly, I'll discuss some possible improvements to the construction and some future work. So let's talk about MAC's method of authentication codes. MAC is a symmetric key preview. It takes possibly large data and mixes it with your secret key and produces small output. The output value is called a tag. The tag has a fixed length output, unlike the input. And the length is usually very small, like 64-bit or 120-bit, et cetera. And the purpose of using MAC for your data is to ensure the integrity of your data. And there are four ways to make a MAC. One is to design from scratch. That gives you a dedicated MAC preview. And second is to utilize a cryptographic hash function, like MD5 or SHA-1, and a well-known example of this type of construction is HMAC. And the third one is to construct your MAC from using a universal hash function. Universal hash function is a mathematical object rather than a cryptographic object. It has certain properties, but by combining it with some cryptographic hash function, you can construct secure MAC. And lastly, you can use a block cipher. And examples include C-MAC, the NIST standard, and PMAC. And of course, this work focuses on the last method block cipher-based construction. OK, so I'll talk more about block cipher-based MAC constructions. And I'll also talk about the PMAC. OK, so there are two major types of block cipher mode operation used for message authentication code. One is CVC iteration. And one is PMAC, the other one is PMAC structure. CVC iteration is basically your data is partitioned into blocks. And you iterate your encryption of your data.  Then you encrypt that and you repeat that to the end of your message or to the end of your data. And whereas for PMAC, you prepare a special value called the mask in advance. And this mask needs to be updated at each step.   Then the output value is extra altogether to go into the final process. OK. So, well, here's a very rough compression between CVC iteration and PMAC structure. As you can see, CVC is inherently sequential, whereas PMAC is parallelizable. It's actually fully parallelizable. If you look at the PMAC structure, these masks needs to be updated, but they can update itself. You don't have to look at the implementation of mask doesn't depend on your data. So you can increment your mask offline if you want. I'm sorry. And if you look at the extra operations outside your block cipher, well, for CVC, you only need extra operation. So that's pretty efficient. But for PMAC, well, you need, for each block cipher call, you need two XORs and masking mutation. Usually, masking mutation, mask update operation can be done pretty fast, but not as fast as XOR. So that's a bit slower than just XOR CVC operation. So I'm not going to really argue which one's better, but I'd like to emphasize that we choose PMAC here in this work because of not performance reasons, but for provable security reasons. Seems like because of the power of structure, PMAC seems to have a structure easier to analyze than the CVC duration. And in fact, some of our techniques cannot be applied to CVC duration. So let me explain what I mean by this. So, well, this is the intuition behind this feeling. So when we do security proofs for this type of modification, we have to treat various events and evaluate probability of these events happening. And if you look at the CVC iteration, well, it's sequential. So of course, you have to execute your data block in the order that's defined. And so the order of execution, there's no freedom in the order of the execution here. Whereas for PMAC structure, the construction is fully parallelizable. It means that usually you execute your data block sequentially because that's the most efficient way for mask implementation. But in security proofs, it really doesn't matter which data block you evaluate first. So and this is really the intuition behind why PMAC seems to have a structure easier to analyze from the point of view of security proofs, of course. And then I'll talk about both their programs. OK, so when we talk about security of masks, we usually use the notion of unforgeability. Which means that adversary, without knowing the key, should not be able to produce a valid tag value for new message, of course. And then there's a stronger notion than unforgeability, which is sort of randomness. And as you can tell, the randomness implies unforgeability automatically. If it's really random, looks random, then you can't predict it, so you can't produce a valid tag. And so if a MAC construction is a secure pseudonym function, it's called PRF, then it's also secure MAC. And this is the direction that we follow in this work. OK, so what is the birthday problem? Well, the birthday problem essentially says that if you use N-bit block cipher for your MAC, block cipher based MAC construction, then you only get half N-bit security. Which means that, for example, for using 64-bit block cipher, you only get 32-bit security. If you use 120-bit block cipher, you only get 64-bit security. And for 128-bit, this may not be a big problem, but for 64-bit block cipher, this is a big issue. And 2 to the 32 blocks corresponds to the 32 gigabyte. And we have 64-bit block cipher, not only the old ones, but also new ones, triple S, height, present, and LED. Well, of course, these are either legacy ciphers or lightweight ciphers. And it's questionable whether the 32 gigabyte is a lightweight or not. But in any way, the 32 gigabyte is just way too small.  OK, there are two different birthday problems, two types of birthday problems that exist for block cipher based multiplication. One is actually generic. It's not limited to block cipher based, but it applies to any iterated max. And essentially, the existing attack, the existing sort of forgery attack is possible for any iterated max at the half size of the state size. Well, the state size usually is the block size for block cipher based. This is one of the birthday problems. And bad news for block cipher based max is that for CVC type max, there is even a stronger attack that can produce universal forgery. So this is really bad. And another birthday problem that exists for PRP, for block cipher based multiplication, is so-called PRP, PRF switching lemma. Block cipher is, of course, a permutation for given key. And permutation is sometimes not very easy to handle in security proof. So what you do usually is to replace your permutation with a function. And you say that, well, this is secure. PRP means sort of random permutation. But let's just replace it with your PRS sort of function. Well, you can do that, but only up to the half the size of blocks of queries. So this causes another security degradation. OK, so this is our security result. Our construction achieves, unfortunately, not to the 2 to the n, but 2 to the 2-thirds of n. And so, for example, for 64-bit block ciphers, this corresponds to 42.7-bit security. And that corresponds to 51 terabytes. That's a significant gain. And our mark can be proven to be a secure PRF based on the sole assumption that the underlying cipher is a secure pseudo-random permutation. So of course, we don't use the switching lamina proofs. OK, so let's talk about our constructions. OK, before talking about our construction, I'll talk about some previous constructions that appears on a rather old standardization document, ISO 9797. And actually, the ISO 9797 specifies several algorithms, MAC algorithms, box alpha based all. And one of them actually achieves security beyond the birthday bound. It's slightly worse than an hour bound, but it's close. It's essentially the same 2 to the 2 to the n security. Unfortunately, the problem with this algorithm in ISO 9797 is that it's twice as low as the ordinary CBC or PMAX. So that's why it's called the right-half construction. So this ISO 9797 algorithm is essentially the sum of two independent CBC max. So basically, for the same message or for the same data, you compute CBC max twice using independent keys, then you take the sum, and the sum is your final tag value. Of course, you have to do the CBC max twice, so that's just twice lower. OK, so we don't want this. We want rate one. By rate one, I mean for one block of your data, we only want to call our block cipher only once. Rate one construction, so how to do this? Well, we don't want to double the block cipher call because that would immediately lead you to rate half construction. But we can double everything else. So let's look at the original PMAC construction. Here's the PMAC construction. After the PMAC iteration, it goes into some kind of finalization, which is a special form of block cipher call that produces a tag. Well, the masks, let's double them. We use two different masks and increment them in different ways. Block cipher calls, we don't touch them. But for the state size, we double the state size. And of course, we can't just double them because that would produce the same two things. So we have to sum. One state is just extra of all the outputs, but the other one must be computed in different ways. And we do finite feed multiplication by two to do this trick. And I apologize that this actually, figuring the process version, doesn't describe this correctly. That's just, it's wrong. Sorry. And the finalization, let's double them. Well, this increases your block cipher call because this requires two block cipher calls. But only at the finalization. So independent of your message block, this is just one extra block cipher call. So it's not really, it doesn't make it great too. Then we just take the sum and that's the tag. So this is our construction. OK, this is just how all the extra operations essentially done outside the block cipher is the finite field multiplication by two, or four. Modification by four is just that you do the multiplication by two times. And it uses three keys, sorry, one for the internal PMAC iteration and two keys for the finalization. And as you know, the finite field multiplication by two can be implemented quite efficiently. It's just one bit shift plus one conditional extra. So that's very efficient. All right, so I'll talk about a couple possible improvements to the construction and some open problems related to them. OK, so I said the construction requires three keys. Actually, we can make it two key without much effort. We do this for the finalization. Instead of using two independent keys, we can use the same key, except that now we have to do some tweaking in front of one of the finalization. But that can be done by, for example, multiplication by two. So that's fine. But after this, at the moment, we don't have ways to make it one key construction. The independence between the key of the PMAC iteration and the key of the finalization seems essentially in many places of particular deep proof. And we have a software, no clue how to make it one key. So this is an open problem. And another problem is that the security, two thirds of N. So one idea is instead of doubling, why don't you just chip everything? Well, that may work. But that doesn't give you still two to the N. It only gives you two to the three and over four at best. And you can do this four times, five times. But it doesn't give you two to the N security.  And now you can still call it the rate one, but not practically efficient. And another point is that the bound may not be tight, two to the third, two to the two and over three. We don't know any attacks that break our scheme at this complexity and the proof may be improved. And thank you. That's it. While the next speaker is setting up any questions. So we don't need the diagram. We have the two parallel masks being updated at the top. To me, you're exhoring two things together. It's conceptually, it's just a really complicated update of one mask. So does your proof actually rely on the two different? Yeah, yeah. That's actually essential to obtain the security beyond the birthday bound. Because we need two to the, we want two and a bit randomness in evaluating our security because we have that's, and that's how we introduce two and bit randomness in the input of the PMACA direction. We can. OK, thank you. I'll have to read. Bye-bye. Yes. One more question. So the abundance of source and linear operations here gives some intuition that the attacks that may exist between the bound to have proved and two to the end, they might exploit some linear combinations of inputs and outputs. Do you try some attacks of this kind or do you have some non-trivial attacks that are in this gap? No, not really. I'm not quite sure what's, you're talking about the gap between the full security of M-dispand. Not quite sure which, I mean, I'm not quite sure how tight the bound is. So I haven't really explored any attacks, specific attacks. And we're really late, sorry. Yeah, we could take this offline. Sorry about that, we're running five minutes late now. So let's thank the speaker again. OK, the next talk is about authenticated and misused resistant encryption of key dependent data. The paper is by Mihir Bellarian, Suram QVD, and the speaker will be Suram QVD. Hello, everyone, good evening. I'm Suram. I'll be talking about authenticated encryption of key dependent data. This is joint work with Mihir Bellare. Classically, the security of encryption schemes has been captured by the indistinguishability under the chosen plain text attack, or the INDCPA in Ocean of Security. This was introduced by Golwasar and Mikali in 84 in the public key setting, and later by Bellarian others in 97 in the symmetric key setting. Now, over time, we have gained a lot of confidence on INDCPA, and we would regard it as sufficient for many practical applications. But INDCPA comes with a caveat. Messages cannot depend on the key. Now, there are certain applications where we would like security even when the message depends on the key. If we had this kind of security, we could get anonymous credentialed schemes. This was shown by Kamenash and Lishansky in 2001. A year later, Black, Rockaway, and Shrinton showed connections between key dependent messages and formal methods in cryptography. Now, they modeled key dependent messages by deriving the message from the key using a message deriving function, phi. It turns out, apart from these applications, there are several practical settings in which key dependent messages arise. Disk encryption tools, like BitLocker, sometimes end up storing the key use for disk encryption on the disk itself. Often, these keys are derived from the user's passwords, say, with a hash function. And this password could be lying on the disk. And sometimes, the hash of the password could also be lying somewhere on the disk. Because of concerns like these, the IEEE standards for disk encryption, IEEE 1619, rejected one of the candidate schemes they were considering because that scheme had a prominent KDM attack. This is kind of an indication that KDM security is important in practical concerns, too. More generally, we cannot expect users or designers of systems to ensure that the key and the data are not related. Rather, we want to design cryptosystems which are secure, even when the key and the messages are related to each other. And this is about misuse of systems and getting robust cryptosystems. Anyway, coming back to the work of Black, Rockaway and Shumpton, they extended the standard indistinguishability under the chosen plain text attack, INDCPA, to consider key-dependent messages. They provide models, definitions, and they show that this notion, KDM-CPA, there are schemes which are secure in this notion. They describe the following random model scheme. And subsequently, there has been a lot of work in KDM about removing this random molecule and getting standard model schemes which are KDM secure. If we look at these schemes, we find that they are usually, they consider security for restricted classes of message-deriving functions, and they are inefficient and impractical. On the other hand, cryptographers have asked about the possibility of key-dependent messages arising in other primitives. Halloween crotchic considers security of pseudo-random permutations and pseudo-random functions in the presence of key-dependent messages. Back as Fitzman and Skedra have extended the CPA scheme of Black-Rogway and Schimpton to consider a basic form of authenticated encryption. In this work, we revisit key-dependent messages in the setting of authenticated encryption. But we take a more comprehensive view and we focus on the practical aspects. Why? Because arguably, for symmetric crypto, authenticated encryption is the most important primitive going by the extent of usage. So we want to know what are the issues that arise when we think about key-dependent messages in AE in a practical sense. So let's first take a look at authenticated encryption. There is no KDM here, this is standard authenticated encryption. Now, the first thing to note is that, unlike CPA, authenticated encryption not only guarantees the privacy of the message, but also its integrity. If we look at the model of authenticated encryption considered by Back as Fitzman and Skedra, which we will call classical AE, we see that the encryption scheme takes in a key and a message and a random IV. Now, in practice, authenticated encryption schemes are more complex. Not only do they have to deal with the message, they also have to deal with associated data in the form of a header. This header is also provided as input to the encryption scheme. The interesting thing to note is that, the scheme has to guarantee only the integrity of this header, not the privacy. Another change is that unlike the classical AE, in modern schemes, there is no random IV. Instead, there is a nonce, which is provided as input. This nonce does not have to be random. We'll come back to the nonce issue in a couple of slides. So, if we want to look at authenticated encryption and KDM in practice, this is the form of AE we want to look at. And as I mentioned earlier, authenticated encryption is an important practical primitive, so there are many standards talking about authenticated encryption schemes in mobile security, in IPsec, et cetera. And these standards consider AE schemes with a nonce and a header in this form. So now, if we bring in KDM, what are the issues that we have to handle? As always, the message can depend on the key. This is what KDM is about. But now, we also have a header, and the header can also depend on the key. Not just that, the nonce that is given as an input to the encryption scheme does not have to be random. If the nonce is random, we are in one setting. This is the random non-security setting. But there is another setting called universal non-security where the encryption scheme is only guaranteed a nonce that is unique, that is non-repeating. It could be from any source. For example, it could be a counter. Now, it's easy to see that universal non-security is more attractive in practice. It's easier to maintain a counter than it is to maintain a source with good randomness or pseudo-random, good pseudo-random generator. Consequently, the standards that we saw on the previous slides, sorry, the standards that we saw, see here, actually talk about authenticated encryption in the universal non-setting. Let me just go back there. Okay, so we have to, we're starting to see that if we want to look at KDM in authenticated encryption, there are all these things we have to deal with, different kinds of nonces, messages, headers, et cetera. As a result, we're not looking at one object here, but we are actually looking at many variants. The message and the header could both be key dependent or not. And this already gives rise to four possibilities. And we also have random versus universal nonces. So we have to deal with eight possibilities in all eight variants. And the natural question to ask is, can we get schemes, can we get secure schemes in all of these variants? Or can we at least, so there is another issue here. So if we cannot get security in some of these schemes, can we at least show that it is not possible to achieve security? For example, can we show attacks that say that whatever scheme is there in a variant, the attack breaks the scheme? So one thing is easy to do here, if the message and the header are both independent of the key, then we fall back to normal authenticated encryption. We know we can achieve this. We have standardized and secure schemes that achieve security in this setting. So let's look at the other variants. Now we have six variants in all. The message can be key dependent. The header can be key remittant. Or both of them can be dependent on the key. And the nonce could again be random or universal. So in this work, we ask the question if whether it is possible to achieve KDM security in these settings. Our first contribution is a simple and universal, unified way to deal with all these variants so that we don't have to end up, I mean redoing some of the proofs and definitions, et cetera. And we show two attacks. Our first attack shows that with universal nonces, it's not possible to get KDM security. Now keep in mind that the standards that we saw all talked about authenticated encryption with universal nonces. So what this means is that none of these standardized encryption, authenticated encryption schemes can be extended to key dependent message security. This is already somewhat bad. And the other attack that we show rules out security in the presence of key dependent headers. So what is remaining? The only remaining setting is when the header is independent of the key and the nonce is random and the message still depends on the key. We show that it is possible to achieve KDM security in this setting. Our solution to this problem is a scheme, RHD, randomized hashed and encrypt. RHD actually is not a standalone scheme. It's a transform. It takes a normal authenticated encryption scheme and transforms it into one, which is secure in the setting. And it's a very lightweight, simple transform. It has minimal computational overhead. And we show that there are no extra elements being added to the ciphertext, so the overhead in bandwidth is also zero. And it can be thought of as some sort of a software patch that can be applied to a system to make it KDM secure. And we show that RHD is secure in the monocle model. Okay, so in the rest of the talk, I'll be focusing more on the results that I just mentioned, the two attacks on the RHD. So to look at these attacks, I should first define KDM security. And before I do that, let's just quickly recall authenticated encryption security. In fact, one of our contributions in this paper is to come up with a simple, novel authentication encryption security definition. But I won't go into that in detail here. I'll just look at this from a very high level so that we can make sense of that attack that we'll describe later. So when we want to describe the security of a scheme, we think of a game between a challenger and an adversary. And in the beginning of the game, the challenger chooses a random bit B and a key K. This is authenticated encryption security so the adversary can make both encryption and encryption queries. So when the adversary makes an encryption query, depending on whether this B was chosen to be one or zero, the challenger is going to reply either with real encryptions or random bits. There is one thing to note of interest that is if we are talking about universal non-security, the adversary gets to provide the nonce that will be used for encryption. But if you're talking about random non-security, this is not allowed. The challenger will choose its own nonces randomly. This will play an important role in the attack. Other than that, that adversary can make the encryption queries and if the decryption query corresponds to a valid ciphertext, then the adversary will get back a one, otherwise it will get a zero. This is if the bit B is one. Bit B is zero, then adversary will always get invalid decryption. The aim of the adversary is to find this bit B. If you talk about KTM security, the basic structure of the game remains the same. The only difference is that now, encryption queries, rather than taking a message as argument, now have a description of a function, a message-deriving function, fee. And the challenger will evaluate this fee on the key to get the message. Everything else remains the same. Okay, so now let's look at the first attack. Recall that what we're saying here is if the authenticated encryption scheme does not get random nonces, but gets nonces from some arbitrary, non-repeating source, then it's not possible to have KTM security. The starting point of our attack is an earlier attack was presented by BlackRock and Strimton, and their attack was on stateful encryption schemes. So before we dive into the attack, let me just give a high-level idea of what's going on here. The adversary, if you're in the universal non-setting, the adversary gets to provide the nonce. We saw this earlier. So one of the strategies of the adversary could be to embed this nonce in the message-deriving function, fee. Recall that fee is evaluated by the challenger on the key. So fee knows both the nonce and the key. In other words, fee can simulate the encryption of random messages. So here's a high-level idea of what adversary could do. The aim of the adversary here is to get just one bit of the key, K of one. And what it's going to do is choose a random nonce, an arbitrary nonce, and another random string S, and embed them both as part of fee's description. And fee's job is to, fee knows the key, fee's going to be evaluated on the key. So fee's job is to somehow find K one and communicate it back to the adversary. So how can fee do this? The only thing fee can do is output a message, and this message will subsequently get encrypted, and ciphertext will be given to the adversary. So fee does this following thing. Fee just randomly, arbitrarily, chooses different messages, tries encrypting them, and checks if the dot product of S and the ciphertext is the same as the bit of the key. Once fee finds such a message, it stops and outputs this message. The challenger now takes this message and encrypts it, and gets the same ciphertext that fee got, and returns this ciphertext to the adversary. What can the adversary do? It already knows S. It knows that S dot product of S and this ciphertext is the same as the first bit of the key. So it can just recover that bit. In fact, the adversary can repeat this for all the bits of the key, and recover the key completely. This attack seems to work, but there's one problem. We don't know how long evaluating this, I mean, how long five will run for. We don't know when five will find such an M that satisfies the property. So we can fix this. It's easy to fix. The only thing to do is to make sure that fee stops eventually, when it realizes that it has gone for too long. So we do this by, you know, putting a bound on the running time of fee, saying that it can only try L times, but L is a parameter that we provide to the adversary. If fee does not find a required message within L times, it's going to just output some arbitrary message. And instead of a dot product, we are now going to look at a family of power's independent hash functions. So we can show that this works. I'll not go into the details. We can show that if we choose L to be comparable to the number of bits in the key, then we will get an adversary which recovers the key with a high probability. So let's stop for a second and see what we have done here. So this attack is somewhat serious because we are not just distinguishing between B equal to zero and B equal to one. We are actually recovering the key. And maybe this attack is artificial, but it still rules out the possibility of getting schemes that are secure with universal answers. We have a similar attack in the paper that shows how it is not, I mean, how in the presence of key dependent headers, it's not possible to get security. But I'll skip that attack here in test of time. So what do these mean? What do these two negative results mean for us? And we go back to the table of variants that we started off with. We see that whenever we have universal answers, it's no longer possible to get security. And similarly, whenever we have key dependent headers, again, it is not possible to get security. So the most important takeaway is that standardized schemes require universal answers and we can't get KDM security in these settings. This is rather sad. So what is left to do? The only variant where we can still hope to get secure schemes is with random answers, key independent headers and key dependent messages. And we show that this can be achieved by our scheme, randomized hash and encrypt. So our scheme is actually a transform. It takes an existing authenticated encryption scheme and converts it into a scheme that is secure in the setting we saw earlier. And internally it uses a hash function. So this is what it looks like. If you look at the new encryption scheme, it takes in a key L, a non-SAR, a header H and a message M. And from this key L and the non-SAR, it generates a new temporary key K. This is interesting because every time the encryption routine is called, a new key will be generated. And this new key is what is going to be used for encryption. It will be fed to the encryption routine along with the header and the message. Decryption proceeds in a natural manner. Assuming this works, it's easy to validate all the properties we claimed earlier. Minimal computational overhead because the only extra thing we are doing here is making a call to a cryptographic hash function, like SHA-1. And these things are notoriously fast in practice. When we ran experiments with CCM for the base authenticated encryption scheme and SHA-1 for the hash function, we found that the overhead due to this whole process was less than 1% when the message was 50 kP or larger. And zero bandwidth overhead because anyway, for authenticated encryption schemes, we need a nonce. And the only thing we are doing here is using the nonce in a different manner. Instead of feeding it to the encryption scheme, we are using the nonce to generate a key. Similarly, simple software changes. We can just think of a patch that makes a call to a random molecule before actually running the encryption routine. So that brings me to the end of my talk. Thank you. We have some time for questions. No questions, so let's thank the speaker.


Hey everyone, Carlos here, aka Modern Mowgli here with Medea Benjamin of Code Pink. As you may know, we are social media folks and you know, it's a lot of people online who like to talk a lot about smack and say, you know, it's all good to post on social media, but why don't you go do something about it? And here we are. Here we are getting ready just to think that in a short time, there's going to be full of people from all over the world, more than 30 countries are coming. And we're going to be making our way to Gaza. I can't wait. We are very excited to get our message out to the world so that Israel will hopefully do what is correct and what is lawful, which is to allow us to go through and deliver this desperately needed aid into Gaza. This looks like a huge ship. This is a gigantic ship. You can't see there's many levels above us and below us. The engine compartment goes down for two levels below us and we saw them loading up some supplies then at the end when we first arrived. And how many people do you think will be on the ship? There's space for thousands, but we have a few hundred and it's really exciting to see it all coming together here in Istanbul. So I'm going to be working with you and with all these organizers here. And we will be updating people every step along the way as long as we have internet, right? Absolutely.


There are countless unexplained ancient enigmas which can be found atop a remote mountain side of Peru, within a site only rediscovered within known modern history, now famously known as Machu Picchu. Polygonal masonry Although it is a technique found all over the world, the standard of polygonal masonry on show within the ancient sites of Peru is undoubtedly some of the most impressive found anywhere on Earth. However, as we have discussed in the past, with varying degrees of reaction to our discourse, ancient civilizations the world over, nearly all currently unexplained ancient ruins, no matter where they are found, has some form of celestial significance built into its construction. The controversial question, however, is why? Why do we see the monitoring and indeed celebration of solstices throughout ancient culture? Why and indeed how were these precise alignments accomplished? Is into a hatana yet another astonishing relic left as a nod to the advanced knowledge of its builder, people who somehow constructed the clock, and indeed Machu Picchu, their surrounding settlement? Now tied to countless legends as to its origins, the most popular, however, is that Ente Huatana is quote, the place where the sun becomes tangled, end quote. It was constructed with precise alignment, perfectly angled to face the four cardinal points. It is located at the top of the mountain, atop a structure adorned with 70 steps leading to its position. It is unquestionably an ancient upart, and is considered, by all who are aware of its existence, as a wonder of ancient technology. A solar clock somehow created to indicate when it was precisely the winter solstice. It is, coincidentally, a time which is hugely significant to modern-day Peruvians. Known to the Incas as Inti Reimi, the long-held local celebrations seem to coincide with the purpose of the clock, once undoubtedly created using tremendous effort and knowledge, all in the effort to signify this same date, one which is officially the most important celebration of the entire empire. Is this pure coincidence? Or is this celebration a surviving tradition dating back to a forgotten antiquity? Incredibly, there are, in fact, two Inti Huantanas, or solar clocks, within ancient Peru. One is located in Pesach, and the, as aforementioned Machu Picchu solar clock, positioned on what is now classified as a sacred mountain. On September of 2000, a beer company was making a commercial when one of their cranes hit the solar clock. They unfortunately broke off part of the point and left the relic in a terrible condition. The National Institute of Culture, however, the INC, sued the company for damages in 2005 and was awarded an undisclosed amount. Who built these incredible ancient solar clocks? Why were so many ancient civilizations obsessed with the sun and, indeed, its activity and precessions? Were these ancient civilizations trying to tell us something? Why were so many ancient quarries left in a state of seeming abandoned? As if the ancient people, once undertaking the movement and placement of ancient megaliths so huge, we today still cannot explain how they were moving them, seemingly vanished, right in the middle of said undertakings. Were these solar clocks like the ancient quarries which still mystify all who explore them, a surviving clue as to the fate of this past civilization? They are undoubtedly highly compelling.


What's going on folks this Giovanni from the option trading channel today is June 12, 2020 Looks like we're about to get ourselves into a position here Yes, we got it in awesome guys Butting at 30 12 and 25 cents I'm gonna go ahead and set my target prices stop losses all that jazz So I don't know why my orders aren't showing up here. Am I on the wrong chart? It's not showing up Screw it. I'm just going to mark itself. I can't figure this out why Go okay sweet at the very least I sold at a profit that was good Righty guys, so I made a lot of errors here today I am basically panicked, but let me show you all the trades that I took today I did take an extra trade off camera. All right Let me show you today's trades in full. I did it again I did make that trade off camera, but this was my initial buy of three contracts I bought them at 30 12 and 25 cents sold to at 29 98 I sold that market as you saw and I sold that last one at break even I was actually able to queue up my stop loss order at break even at 30 12 50 and It executed and then I bought one other one again This is all shorting the mark him bought in at 29 96 75 and I'm selling at 29 90 I was basically buying when I first bought this contract I put in a stop loss at 3003 even and I was hoping that the trend would just keep continuing going I was hoping that it would just run away and As it inched down it got as low as 29 70 in that area And I kept putting my stop loss up lower lower so I can capture those gains I wouldn't lose and I did good. I did good. It ended up. This is the candle that I traded here It went back up and now it's trading in between both bands. So overall. I'm really happy. I'm up 608 dollars will actually 603 dollars over all on the On my accounts, I also wanted to go ahead and show you my little sheet here on on Google Docs On Google Drive. I'm putting all of my trades on the spreadsheet Documenting it. I am putting notes on the side you know sort of my mental health and the health of the trade Just the status of the trade and again these two right here in the red under the nets Those were the two glitches there So if we don't count those which I'm not counting those I have a total of 11 trades Nine of which are in the green and I have two legitimate losing trades. So pretty excited about that guys Thank you everybody so much for watching today's trade. I'm sorry that it was basically a crap show I wanted to say the other word, but you guys know how that goes and I apologize for not being able to Make this a solid video for you seeing my live trades as they happen But I live to see another day. I did make close to a hundred and sixty dollars today trading the micro e mini s and p 500 futures you guys have an awesome weekend see you here on the very next trading video hoping It's a green trade


With an imaginary H-bomb attack on New York City, and with the measures that civil defense would take in such an event, for the rescue and protection of the population in and around the city, the happenings that will now follow on your screen might be taking place in a suburban community some 50 miles from New York, but are entirely fictitious, of course. It is the prayer of every one of us that such happenings shall forever remain fictitious. Hey kids, if I'm going to drop you off the school, you'd better wiggle. The 823 will not wait for me. What should I drink my milk? Make a guess, Jimmy. Michael, you know what I think? I think it's awful. Oh mother, yes, Bobby. Don't you stop calling me by that baby name. It's Barbara. What jeep was we've been calling you, Bobby, for 14 years. I don't see why you're calling. No, of course not. You wouldn't. No, Bob. Mommy, will you listen? You know those white jackets I got at the bar who sailed to the babysitter's club? They have to be washed and ironed for the night's meeting. Oh, sweetie, on the day the maids out six won't they wait? Well, if you want to make it out... Oh, why can't we be like other families? A nice, normal group of people. We are, John. Oh, what? Normal. As oatmeal and apple pie. Come on now, up and out of the house. The jacket will be done. Come on, kids, out. The meeting's going to be an A. I know we women have got to keep up with the... By a hydrogen warhead carried by a guided missile, defensive damage and heavy loss of life. To keep constantly informed, use your battery-operated portable or automobile radios. Keep your set tuned to this thing. And I know he went. I know he wasn't in his office when it happened. I just know he's been living with this thing in the back of our minds for years. He's prayed it would never happen, but now he's got to keep our heads up. Attention, please, that they will burn themselves out within a few hours to a few days. Radiological crews are now making an inspection... Ian, please. Who are you? I'm Garfield Lee. Let me in. I'll explain. It's about your daughter, Barbara. Barbara? Yes, it's a matter of... I'm her science teacher in high school. Now we know that me in. Wasn't that a rifle shot? Yes, auxiliary police, probably. There are losers around already. Tell me, what about Barbara? I think she may have been exposed to radiation today. Thank you. What's your... I was bringing my class back from a trip to the aircraft plant for the bomb fell. As we reached the school, it began to rain. Rain that may have been radioactive. May have, was it or wasn't it? I'm not sure, but to be on the safe side, you should have a test made of Barbara as soon as possible. What sort of a test? With a Geiger counter. But I don't follow you. If the radio particles have entered, they go to the bone marrow causing a drop in the blood count. But that won't come until later. Right now our Geiger counter is the only thing that'll give us any indication. I'm not sure about this, but just as a preventative, I thought I should see the parents of all the students who are with me. Would you wait here, please? Of course. Us, please. Why, is he going around making tests or something? Should he? A chief of dogs, he knows everything in the world about Adam. He works in... He did? Only when they started making the bombs, he decided to give it up into high school. He did? Well, what did he do that for? To be sure that all the children were on the field trip are all right. But what? It seemed to be on the safe side. Some of them can't... Because I have my own very good reason. That is a full set of instructions. That's the radiation? Community organization, you think of everything. Well, we trained for it long enough. Civil defense. Some folks thought it was a kid's game. You know, lots of laughs. Just a game. Some game. Some laugh. Well, now, is there anything special you'd like to know? A million things. Where my husband is. When Oliver... His thing goes on. And Barbara. Perhaps she might have been exposed to radiation. Shouldn't she be tested? Well, now, they've just opened a new emergency hospital down the street in the Legion Hall. Take her out in the street? Oh, they think it'll be perfectly safe. Bye tomorrow. Bye tomorrow? Wait until then. No, wait, wait. I'll tell you what. Young Doc's finale. I know that he's standing by right now waiting for the first wounded from New York. I think I can grab him for a minute. I can't tell you how thankful I am. That's my job, Mrs. Mitchell. That's what I signed for. Who'd ever thought of all the times that I drove up to your gas station? We won't know what regular is again for a long, long time. It's hardly stirring at all. Just picking up a tiny bit of radioactivity that you picked up from the school dog, going to the bus, and from the bus into here. Well, it doesn't even show one millirenction of radioactivity on me. Right. It would have to show at least two-and-a-half or three millirenctions to be worth thinking about. Correct, Professor Mitchell. I have the honor to report that you are a very well-informed, 100% red-blooded American girl. Doctor, is Barbara all right? Yes, ma'am. She's as right as... Oh, no. Now, the times have done something to rain. Would you test Jenny, too? Oh, sure. All right, Jenny. Here. Now, each of you. Doctor, ma'am? Yes, by the time I got back to the kitchen he'd left, he seemed so strange, for instance, the way he didn't want me to mention his name. Oh. Can't you guess why? Sure he weren't being sick? You hardly ate me supper. Barbara, were you stationed poisoning? Yes. Well, look at these instructions. See, they... nausea and vomiting made me emotional, all from some other cause, and without evidence, shouldn't be taken too seriously, unless it recurs in a week or so. People don't feel so good tonight. No, I guess not. Ladies and gentlemen, stand by. She just doesn't care. Let up. Ladies and gentlemen, I'll go get them for you. Bobby and I were up the first thing this morning. Late into the week, Skipper. I found these up in the attic. I thought you might be able to use them. Oh, I thought we'd sold those out years ago. They're in chip-chase now, ladies. Thank you, Mr. Flood. It's good to have you aboard. Will you put them on, ma'am? Yes. Ma'am, isn't that y'all? He hasn't been on long. Why don't you write to your Santa Claus what's left of anything? Do anything. No. From the window. We're left here to die, little by little. Oh, Mrs. Moore. Oh, yes. Meanwhile, my bones are burning away inside of me, and pretty soon my hair will all start falling out. Sign up to be cast away on a desert island with that one. And that other one in there, Mrs. Harvey. Going down just like a ship in the sea.  I mean, the way you keep going on, always looking around for what's to be done next. I'll give you this, that never have such big holes been knocked in the world within these last few days. And there are those who say that there'll be no more tomorrows. Well, they're in for a big surprise, because tomorrow does come. Maybe it glimpses a little, maybe it crawls, but it does come. Question is, what do you want to be on board, or just get left behind? Are you going out? Yes, I think it's safe enough now. I'm told they need hand spares, down at the rest center. See you later, ladies. Nice with a hammer and nails. Several days, your daughter has been allowing you to stay in your cellar. He can't... I am not popular with some of my fellow countrymen. And these bombings have done nothing to reach me. Charlie, I understand you. Nor do I. I've found my life's work in the investigation of our universe. Of matter. What held it together drove it... I worked with a pencil, strapped the paper in my thoughts. Now how, I reasoned, could that bring harm, even the smallest of gods? And then I learned that my every thought was being turned to... To a comet bearing? To the creation of the most destructive weapons the world has ever known. What's done? I've been raised on certain principles. Among those, thou shalt not kill, not ever not under any circumstances. And then I learned every thought was structured. As soon as I found that out, I gave up my work and I turned to teach it. I see. But, Mother, if he truly, honestly believes and passes the room, sure, and so would I like to. But all it takes is one hoodlum running wild in the streets and what are we supposed to do? I've heard that argument before. But I've always hoped that there'd be enough men of goodwill on all sides that they could get together in decency and reason. Fine. But we three stood here just a moment ago with the best will in the world and then suddenly three men came in. But why did it have to happen? Why did I have to use this gun? Yes, why? But that's the way it did happen. And I'm only thankful that you took that gun in your hands and fired it. I'm so sorry, Miss. I still say I deplored. Isn't that a luxury? That kind of sentimentality? Where would we all be if we decided to think that way?  Let me now have a couple hoodlums trying to run away. Yes, from here, my husband's birdgun. You? Well, the fact is...   It's done now, Dr. Lee. Oh, no. From now on, most people here will have to give you a new name. What? From now on, you're Mr. Wallace, an old friend of Dad. Do you think they had to know that there wasn't anything anymore on the other end of the line? No. If there's anything I can do, whether... Falling on their people, the same as theirs, fell on us. All that misery and death was where their leaders ever just started. What did they think they were going to get out of it? Didn't they know that it would all end up with everybody having a lot less of everything? You should have seen those crowds all night coming through the relief center. Nothing in their hands to carry. Not even a souvenir. Oh, nice. Won't you ever sleep, Mr. Fluss? Well, I was thinking of catching a couple of winks right now.  Oh, a little better.  And that gentleman out there, you know a lot about your mother. And that little son. And that gentleman out there with her. Mr. Wallace? Yes, he's done wonders. You might say he pulled her right back from the grave. Waving you his cane. Couldn't see anything anymore. I wasn't even sure I was alive. But after a while, I did begin to hear. Hear what? Voices all around. The bell was been sent. The children all, Mr. Fluss. You. Well, naturally we were concerned. Naturally. Don't talk as if it were nothing. Everything. So much has been bonged out of the world. Concerned enough I'm taking care of what's happening. I guess that's what Mrs. Moore is always after, Flussing. I am sorry for her. For almost everyone, aren't you? I'm not a weeping walrus, but I realize there is a great deal of sorrow in the world. Unfortunately, some of it I helped to make. You never were meant for pure science. Well, I know some man who can see everything is particles in one form or another. But there was always nothing wrong with my equation. Something quite unscientific. Those human factors, those particles that we call a heart. So wild and unmanaged. Made you do strange things? Were out in the street to warn your students they might be sick? Well, wouldn't anybody? No, not anyone.  Yes, and I fired. But no one was hit. But the next time I fired, I would have shot the kill. It wasn't a thing you would have done for yourself. Only for others. You think so? I know this much now. That we'll oftentimes do things for others that we'd never dream of doing for ourselves. And I've got that awful news four days ago. Mrs. Mitchell. I didn't want anything for myself except not to be any more. I can understand that. But after a while I heard voices. Your children, naturally. I'll always be thankful to you. I'm the one to be thankful for the shelter you've given me. It's you who gave us the shelter. Tell me, has anyone been feeding you these pastures? Mrs. Harvey pulled herself together. And Barbara has pitched in just magnificently. Well, back to the kitchen. Mrs. Moore. What about Mrs. Moore? I just saw her packing her things. Getting ready to leave us, I guess. Did she say anything? Nothing, not a word. Well, I'd best turn up to her. Moore, you're leaving us? Yes. Yes, I... I haven't been a very good guest. I realize that. So on that account, we've all had our attack of nerves. Yes. Now this morning, they blocked Warden order me down the street to that hospital for a blood count. What happened? Nobody would believe me.  Yes, I've been sick all along. Quite sick. Yes, Mr. Penn. You're ready to leave now. We'll take you over to White Plains Hospital. It's one of the best in the country. They'll have everything you need. Just don't let yourself get upset, Mrs. Moore. I don't think we have to worry about how Mrs. Moore's taking it. You know, it's such a strange feeling. Knowing for sure. I don't know. Somehow it makes it easier all of a sudden. Easier? Yes. Yes, the other way. Not really knowing. You just don't know how to be or what to be, but once it's decided for you, what way is there to be? I think of all the harsh words. Oh, no. Please. Thank you very much for putting me up. And putting up with me. Goodbye. What have I done to die? If Timothy would come up at once. Sure. When he study at Jenny. Why? Because blood is very interesting. Come on, lie down. Radiation. Just a week ago showed negative. We kept her in doors all the while with things. I don't know how it happened, but the best thing to do is notify the block warden at once. I'll go get her. Please. It should be enough to tell him about the poor one. He used to it. And that other man, he stabbed me this morning. What of the man? Mr. Wallace did something. Mr. Wallace? Mitchell, we'd better get it to the hospital. But what I'd very much like to have. Yes. Is the results of that other blood count this morning. Other. I gather from Jenny that there was one. We'll just see. First of all, Mrs. Mitchell, is equipped to be taking blood count. She'll not be roaming around on her own. What concerns me more is the score of that other count. Matched with a new one, it'll give me more of an exact idea of what's happening to Jenny. Guidance in her course of treatment. Well, I assure you. It's all right. Oh, Dr. Lee. Doc! Dr. Lee, are you Garson Lee? Here's the blood count. Thank you. That's all you'll need it. Garson Lee, say just a minute. You don't want it down at headquarters. Oh, wait a minute, everybody. You're barking up a wrong tree. You see, the reason we want you down at headquarters, Doc. I can get. This is to set up a research project at once. Research? Yes, on radiation exposure and how to deal with it. His brains are a national asset, you might say, especially right now. Research. I've already set up that project with myself as my own walking laboratory, my own guinea pig. You're sick, too? I've known it for several days. I've been taking my own blood count. Why on earth did you try to get treatment? I was afraid to show myself. Well, that was my mistake. I'll say, tell me. Well, now that I can get adequate treatment, who knows? Doc. What did you do with Michael? Michael, you mean your little rag horse? He's got a rag. We just took him to feed him some oats. Now, don't you worry. There she is. Yes. A long course of treatment. Complaining was she took in a lot of the particles you're selling from the farm.  Isn't there anything you can do, really, do? Well, radiation, sickness, can be treated like any other. I want to stay in bed here. Come back here. I hate buying new television sets in the children's board. Now, you come along. Yeah, you go and check TV. They're the same as any other boil, Mrs. Mitchell. They just come because the body's resistance gets low and it can't fight off the bugs. I think of Jenny. They're only important if they're not kept clean. Antibiotics help another thing. Jenny, she's never been away from us for one night. I know.  They lose their bandages. They won't lie still. Could she possibly be treated at home? Could she? There'll be lots of injections right around the clock, Mrs. Mitchell. Well, I was a nurse's aide once and some more of her. And also, I worked at the Red Cross Mud Bank. Yes, but just you alone. And Barbara. Well, kids are inclined to be squeamish, especially when blood is in their hair. Kids? Not Barbara. Not the way she's grown up this past week. I guess that settled it. Just a minute, dearest.  Well, uh, you know that little, uh, rag horse that she toasts around at Toy? Could that have been left out on a porch during the radioactive rain and gotten soaked? Of course.  I put a geiger counter on Michael. He's still hot. He's a one-man bomb. Trojan horse in our home. Isn't anything safe anymore? As of today, the various utilities will be restored to fuller use in various communities throughout this area. That is all. Well, you might say life is flaming higher once again. It's like for Mrs. Harvey. Isn't it wonderful about him? I can't have Michael back. Darling, why not the breakfast room and get ready for your first injection? I want Michael. Look here, young lady, for you with the compliments of the first mate. He made it all by himself. Why can't I have Michael back? Run along, dear. What did the hospital say? The instructions. Jenny's gonna need treats for months and months. Is it that serious? Well, I'll get that hot water going with the issue. Find something we can use for dressing, something we can tear up. Mrs. Mitchell? Yes.  News? My husband. He located us through the welfare organization. Well, how wonderful. He was on the road when the bomb fell. A hundred miles from New York. Oh, I'm so glad for you. So very glad. Oh, I shouldn't be acting so overjoyed considering what's happened to you. Don't apologize for your good luck. Enjoy it. Some general headquarters. It is reported that our planes are now able to fly over enemy territory almost at will. It is expected that we will soon land ground horses at a number of enemy beaches. I repeat, the enemy's will and ability to fight have now virtually been broken. That is all... Remember the white jackets I used to use for babysitting? I sure come in handy now. Thank you, Barbara. Just together in this hot ten days ago, one will never be back. And another. Mummy? Yes, Ginny. Are we winning? Are we? Are we winning, Mummy? Not yet, darling. But we're going to. I promise you that, Ginny dear. We are going to win. It occurs in Washington for their kindness in providing technical information and advice throughout the presentation of tonight's show, Atomic Attack.


Why did thousands of Argentines go out in the streets to protest their new president? When Javier Millay became the first self-described libertarian head of state in history, he explained that to avert economic disaster in a country facing huge deficits at a hundred sixty percent inflation rate, things would likely get worse before it could get better. Just like the fall of the Berlin Wall, at the end of a tragic time for the world, these elections have marked the breaking point of our history. No government has received a worse inheritance than the one we are receiving. We do not seek or wish for the hard decisions that we will have to make in the next few weeks. But unfortunately, we have no choice. Ten days into his term, Millay issued a mega decree of more than 300 executive measures. He abolished national rent control, which had caused a 75% drop in available apartments in Buenos Aires between 2022 and 2023. He repealed price controls, slashed subsidies, and fired more than 5,000 government employees. He allowed direct competition with Argentina's government-owned airline, which he plans to privatize. And he defied the country's powerful labor unions. The strike was organized by the General Confederation of Labor, Argentina's largest labor union, which represents one out of every five Argentine workers. Millay issued an order ending the automatic withholding of union dues, leaving workers free to opt out. And he banned government workers in sectors like health and education from striking. A court ruling temporarily suspended these measures. But in the meantime, unions are making a show of force so that Millay's agenda doesn't make it through Congress. He doesn't have the pulse to adjust to the courts, to adjust to health, to adjust to education. The truth is that he is another more liberal government than Argentina, and we are here to defeat him, obviously. Javier Millay has a seemingly impossible job. But he also has a clear vision for a freer, less regulated, and less debt-ridden Argentina. And he's exceptionally skilled at communicating that vision. Capitalism of free companies is not only a possible system to end poverty in the world, but it's the only morally desirable system to achieve it. If measures are adopted that enthuse free labor in the markets, the only possible destination is poverty. But there are powerful political interests determined to stop him. Millay's main political adversaries aren't Argentina's workers. In fact, the self-described anarcho-capitalist is actually pushing to increase welfare in the short term to ease the pain for the working class during this transition to a new economic model. As Argentine political economist Marcos Falcone told Reason, his adversaries are actually wealthy Argentines who've benefited from government largesse.  We need to move forward and the people need to be able to profit, not just companies because of regulations and privileges. This is the only political class that wants to be perpetuated in power and to maintain their privileges.  No one tells you that your ambition is immoral. If you make money, it's because you offer a better product, a better price, contributing in that way to general welfare. Millay faces a thicket of regulations and political resistance. It will not be easy. We'll have to wait and see if he picked the right chainsaw for the job.