Welcome back to Orlando, Florida, 2018-21 convention. This is the e-ticket for the entire show. I have to confess, I have been seeing the movie trailer for this speech for the last year. Matter of fact, it's been a little over a year. This speech had its origin probably about two, two and a half years ago.  I am terribly pleased to introduce the founder, CEO of 21 University, 21 Studios, and 21 Convention presenting the future is still masculine, Anthony Dream Johnson. Thank you, gentlemen. Let's dig right into it. As he said, the title of my talk this year, sequel to last year's keynote, the future is still masculine. As he said, my name is Anthony Dream Johnson. Soon that will be legally true. My middle name currently is Paul. With that said, while I'm known as the Dream, I have a dream. That dream is to create positive media for men and destroy feminism. Recapping on last year's keynote that was mentioned by Socrates and now myself, I open last year's address with feminism as the ultimate hate and supremacist movement. That's the biggest image of the talk.  Super important and we'll dig more into this concept as we go throughout the talk. What I'm doing with that image, with that idea, with that speech and with this speech, is igniting a cultural revolution, a peaceful revolution, a revolution that destroys feminism and replaces it with something positive. So last year, I spoke during the talk and it was actually joined between Socrates and myself. I spoke, he spoke. He's actually a professional architect. You guys know him as a speaker of this convention on relationships, relationship management, masculinity, things of that nature, but his day job is an architect. He's one of the best.  Surprise, right? That was his component. This is a big unveiling that we've been working on for years. We are hosting this convention right now in hotel. We've done that for many years. We've done it in schools, conference centers, things like that, but eventually the day will come, I think we are not allowed in venues like this. As of yet, we've been able to avoid that problem free. I maintain really strong relationships with venues, but I'm not counting on that. Many others have been deplatformed from Alex Jones to Rooch V and that's just the beginning. That's going to get worse. So we're going to avoid that as long as we can, but long-term, I am not counting on a digital or physical venue platform for this convention. We're fine now, but eventually we have to build it.  That is in motion and we'll dig more into that later in this talk. Continuing on a recap of last year's presentation, the future is masculine.  It spreads and spreads and spreads and it gets worse over time. Whatever it started as, there's controversy and debate for that. What we see today is obscene and disgusting and gross. It's horrible. It's a hate movement against men and it's a premises movement for women. It has infected everything we see in Western life, everything we value, every institution from the government, so we from state, federal, local government, schools, universities, on and on down the line, right down to business and even the family in your home. It's all around us all the time, even right down to churches, entertainment, schools, everything. Feminism as a woman's rights movement is a myth. I do not believe that's true and if it was ever true, it hasn't been true in a long, long time, long before any of us were alive at this point, especially in this room. Feminism today is hatred of men, boys, masculinity, family and fatherhood. It is absolutely opposed to that in every medium we see it and it's getting more explicit, more open, and more aggressive by the day. One of the most important points of slides from last year's presentation I brought into this one is the debate between being anti-feminist, opposing feminism, criticizing it, ridiculing it, making fun of it, opposing it versus being all about positive masculinity and pro-masculinity. My ideas that both are very, very important, perhaps equally important, dead on, I think either one is naive. They are either ignoring an aggressive movement against men or you're focusing entirely on yourself without opposing it or without realizing, without appreciating the environment and culture and context that you exist in. So even if you're all about self-improvement, you want nothing to do with opposing feminism, well, feminists don't care.  And they don't care what you look like. Feminists do not discriminate.  That's your crime for being born that way. Outside of that, they don't care what you look like.   So both are important and this is really important to keep in mind. For many years of this convention, I did not focus enough, not nearly enough, on being opposed to feminism and appreciating the environment that this company that it was evolving in, as well as myself, maturing over time. The older I get, the more apparent this gets and the more aggressive it gets. As we've seen in the culture, we're going to discuss in this presentation. So both elements are important and the complementary. They work together very well and you guys have seen that at this event. Let's discuss what feminism is a little bit. So when people bring up feminism, one of the first things they say, it's all about equality, right? Equality, equality, equality. It's very vague, very poorly defined, very... Feminists are almost opposed to defining it. We try to define it, they want it, they say no. They keep this vague and nebulous momentum going forward. But if it's about equality, they then jump right to equal rights. Well, it's different. Equality is not equal rights. Equal rights is more specific. So if feminism is about equality, equal rights, what about women's rights? They jump to that. Then they jump to women's empowerment. Suddenly, you have this feminism is all about equality, and then it jumps into 47 different things all at once. The silvery slope. They do that so they can goalpost shift over time. They can keep it mutating and shifting over time. So that you can't pin it down and be precise. In fact, I think Roland Tomasi is one of my favorite speakers here. And I think one of the most important contributions he makes to the man of fear and the red pill is his precision. It's surgical.   His precision is needed. Now, that doesn't mean short form content is bad. It means both are important. And the way he writes out his essays, it gets really detailed, is very important.  Because in precision, there is truth. And they hate truth. So feminism has never been about equality. We'll discuss that more later. But I think it's quadrant of ideas. They tend to jump between. It's important to keep this in mind and look at this whenever they bitch to complain about something. Because it's always shifting, always moving around. It's never this tightly defined thing. And that's on purpose. Feminists say that women getting the vote was this major victory for equality. I think it's not. I think it was not at all. I think it was a death of equality in this country. It was a death of equality between rights and responsibilities. Women getting the vote was not the problem. It's women getting the vote in the way they did, the manner they did, that's the problem. There are many thousands of feminists that were opposed to getting the vote, because they thought they were going to get drafted into the military, what we call today a selective service. They dodged that. They got out of that. I think this death of equality between rights and responsibilities is horrible. Obviously, there are racial elements that were fixed later in this country. But in terms of men and women, this is when equality died, 1920. It's horrible. We need to fix this someday. I'm not proposing a solution at this time. I'm pointing out a problem. Let's dive a little bit into the mannosphere understanding of feminism.  I think it's more along the lines of what we see in the mannosphere.  Women are testing us at a wide scale.  They're flipping. It's a power reversal in some ways, revenge and supremacism and hatred of men. I also want to make a point that very few women today identify in the West as feminist, maybe 20, 30% from different studies I've seen. As big of a problem as they are and as annoying as they can be, they're not really the problem.  But more than half of what they think, their core beliefs, what they actually think about and act on on a daily basis and over time in their life, that's what we're concerned with. For them, for women and for men. For men, we call blue pill lies. I think these are feminist lies, the blue pill. This is a control system for men and if fucks men up, it gets men killed. We talk about that at this conference. So with women today in the West, I think feminism has become basically their religion, their philosophy for life. Whether or not they have a particular religion they follow, Christianity, Judaism or whatever, feminism dominates the majority of how they operate over time in their life in major ways, decisions, choices from becoming a mother to schooling to career, things of that nature. Feminism is the dominant force in how they think, how they act over time. It's replaced God, it's replaced, you know, patriotism, everything like that. Every other important pillar of life for them. And the infection rate is incredibly high.  They've been brainwashed more or less, like many men. The difference, of course, is that men have a positive counter movement. We have the manosphere, we have the pickup community, we have the red pill and more. Women don't have that. They have feminism and then nothing. That's a problem. Let's talk a little bit more about feminism versus masculinity. Right now in America, the political tensions are really high. In my lifetime, I'm only 30, but I've never seen anything like what we see today. I've talked to men in the 50s and 60s who say the same thing. They have never seen things this tense in this country, not even close.  And the way it's displayed or portrayed by the mainstream is left versus right, Democrats versus Republicans, liberals versus conservatives. I think that's all nonsense. I think that male-female relationships are the cornerstone bedrock of human life, not just for thousands of years, for the entire span of our species. The red pill in particular focuses in on that, hones in on it as truth, the very raw understanding of it. So male-female relationships precede language and fire. And I think that getting screwed up by feminism is in large part over the past 100 years, is why we're seeing tensions rise so high in politics, left versus right, and the philosophies and groups, the parties of each one. That's not a problem as much as it is a symptom.  I mean, think about it this way. We've talked about Black Dragon, the speaker of this conference, Caleb Jones, and Socrates. I talked about the sexual marketplace, the dating marketplace, and other speakers. Gender relations today have basically collapsed. What are the rules of dating? Nobody knows. It's a complete chaos at this point. You can read about it all day long, study it, try to appreciate it, study the laws, understand game, the red pill.   Feminism has driven that in large part. So I think what we're seeing today with the tensions, left versus right, Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives, that's real, but again, it's more of a symptom than a direct problem. The war we're seeing play out before our eyes is toxic femininity versus positive masculinity. And it's my belief that the future of America and Western civilization hinges on destroying feminism. America will not survive the century in the West without feminism ending. One way or another, all these different mechanisms, birth rates, demographics, family formation, the institution of marriage itself, these things are going to die, they're not going to last if feminism lives as a movement and is a dominant force in the culture. But it has to end and be minimized and put in history books. I wanted to go through this a little here too, get more specific with masculinity and feminism. So this isn't going to get really specific, we're going to hammer through it and I think you guys are going to get it pretty quick. So team masculinity versus team feminism. Team masculinity, we have individual rights versus women's rights, right? Group rights. We have the quality of opportunity versus the quality of outcome. We have patriotism versus globalism. We have the rule of law versus the rule of women. I think displayed perfectly in the recent confirmation of the Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. We have innocent and proven guilty versus guilty until proven innocent. We have believed evidence versus believed women. Personal responsibility for all evade all responsibility. Men and women are different.  Damn right. So we have men and women are different versus female supremacism, which we're going to focus on in just a minute. We have a love of women. By the way, an attendee here nailed that just I believe it was yesterday. During a Q and A session with one of the speakers, he came up and said, I don't think he was 99% right, almost 100%. He said, I love women, but I hate feminism with a passion. I want to one up that.  It's not a but, it's an end.  It is disgusting, nasty, and it destroys women. It destroys families and it hurts men. It drives men to suicide left and right. With masculinity, we have an objective consent standard. No means no. I grew up in the 90s. 90s. That's what I heard. That made a lot of sense. It's very obvious and that worked really well for a long time. With team feminism, we have subjective consent standards, which we now see as enthusiastic consent.   Objective standards matter for the rule of law and that is exactly what feminism hates, what they don't want. Team masculinity is pro-family, team feminism is anti-family, and pro-broken family. Look at the statistics on single motherhood from anyone, whether it's Roland Tomasi writing an essay or Ann Coulter or anyone else. Single motherhood and broken families are horrible for the United States and every Western nation, any nation for that matter. Team masculinity is pro-fatherhood, pro-motherhood, team feminism is anti-fatherhood, anti-motherhood, unless it's single motherhood, apparently. Team masculinity is pro-West and light-man values, the country or the values that built the United States and all the West. Team feminism is anti-Western values. Team masculinity, teamwork and cooperation versus divide and conquer, identity politics, getting everyone amped up. Team masculinity, racism is evil. Team feminism, white men are evil. Team masculinity, boys will be boys.  Rational patriarchy, radical matriarchy. Father knows best, kill all the men. Sarah Jiang is her name. New York Times editorial board said this in our Twitter account before being hired by the New York Times and they were fully aware of it when they hired her. She came out and said to kill all men and kill all white people too, but she then focused on the men. Kill all the men. This is sick. This is extreme racism, kill all white people and extreme sexism and this is becoming normal. This is no longer, 20 years ago this had been radical. Today, that's mainstream.  They're fully aware of this, they don't care. They probably could ask her if she had any friends who wanted to work there. Team masculinity, genocide is evil and crazy. Team feminism, reduced men to 10% of the population. There's an asterisk there, you can read that. The founder of Gender Studies in 1973, a woman, her name's Sarah I believe. In 1973 she gave a lecture advocating to reduce men to 10% of the population.   She actually said this, there's documentation of this, reduced men to 10% of the population.  This is a true face of feminism. We have Kathy Griffin up here chopping the head off of President Trump, by the way a father and grandfather.  She didn't care.  Normalized violence against men.  Even better, you'll never see Anderson Cooper chop off Sarah Palin's head. This level of violence, decapitating somebody is normalized violence against men. You'll never see it in reverse, regardless of political parties. You have Madonna up here, right?   This is a meme we have made up by Buddy of Mine, believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everyone. This is the face of feminism. This is what it's become.  This is getting really extreme, really fast. It gets worse. There's Sarah Jung from the New York Times, like I said earlier. This is her tweet from 2015. Anyway, my point is that we should kill all the men prior to removing the state for marriage and institution.  She got hired. She should be permanently unemployable for saying this.  It probably is one of the reasons she got the job.   Christine Fair, professor at the University of Georgetown, the oldest Catholic university in the United States. She just tweeted this. She did get banned eventually from Twitter. I was surprised. Look at the course of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist, irrigated entitlement. All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gas. Bonus, we castrate their corpses and feed them to the swine. Pigs.  This is sick. This is torture and violence, right out in the open. And then you have Scotzi or Cortez over here, a thousand cocks there, crazed bug eyes.  And then this, this is a Mormon Christian, mother of six, comes out recently. This got over 80,000 retweets, more retweets than a sitting US president gets on an average tweet. She's advocating for castration of all men, for I quote, irresponsible ejaculations, knocking a girl up, an accident. She then advocates for forced sterilizations, vasectomies for all boys who have puberty.  This is no longer, this is extreme, but it's no longer unusual. This is becoming normal. This gets retweeted 80,000 times. I think I just saw it today, it's got over 250,000 likes on Twitter.  This is the new normal for feminism, 2018. Where do you think it'll be in 2028, 2038? Where do you think this goes? You'll say, oh, this didn't ever happen. They're pushing for it. They're talking about it. Talk leads to action. Talk precedes action. More on Justice Brack Kavanaugh. I mean, this guy, you know, Boy Scout, as far as we can tell, lived a perfect, you know, Christian Catholic life. Mr. Clean, impeccable character, went through seven FBI background checks. Absolute witch hunt for this guy. Exactly like Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991. He was a black man in 1991 who was accused of very similar, very similar circumstances by Anita Hill. He got up in 1991 being confirmed to the Supreme Court. He said it was a digital lynching. It was. And now it continues. Now it doesn't even matter where your skin color is.  It's a witch hunt. Me too is a witch hunt and it's a hatred. It's a witch hunt is against men. It's the best way to put it.   This is a witch hunt.   Like these are gang rape.  But hey, we got them. Actually, let's pause here. He was just confirmed to Supreme Court. Great. He was confirmed 50 to 48.  That was upheld. The presumption of innocence was innocent to proven guilty was upheld by a razor thin margin by vote. That's where this country is at politically. That's what feminism is done to men and women gender relations as you see expressed in politics. Barely got it. Just scraped by shifting gears a little bit. I believe that speech is the most dangerous thing in the world. There's a reason that the United States on our Constitution. It's the first amendment not the second. This is a drawing from the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention for Women. About 300 women got together in 1848 and it led to the feminism we see today, regardless of what happened along the way. People meeting anyone, male or female, is powerful. People talking is powerful because talking leads to action. There's another convention that we're familiar with. This is a drawing or a painting from the signing of the Declaration of Independence. People don't like this convention market. They say, what are you going to do?  No. I'm going to build events. I'm going to organize. We're going to talk. Rollo was talking about his speech. He did a great job with it. Women hate men getting together and talking in a male space because you know what happens? Action happens. Things happen. Things change. Very much like it did for them in 1848. We're barely 100 people behind what they had in 1848. As this convention grows, it's going to be attacked, more so than it already is. The point here though is that speech is very, very powerful. Talking, talking, talking, no. It leads to action.  One of the most epic moments in human history. Masculinate the forefront, defeating tyranny, defeating a king, finding the greatest country ever created. It's a masculine future is what we're creating this convention. The West lacks right now a replacement for feminism and we need to destroy it while it has to be replaced with something. If we just destroy it and get rid of it, that doesn't solve anything. That just creates a gap. It creates a vacuum and ain't going to last. It will be replaced by something. I believe that the manosphere, the red pill in this convention are building that future. It's taking time. It takes years. It takes speeches. It takes conventions. It takes videos. It takes the publication of that information. But over time, that's exactly what's being built right here on this stage, right here in Orlando, Florida. I do want to take a moment here and recognize Richard Nicolai, one of our alumni speakers from last year and a couple years previous as well. The effects of feminism.  Now, I say American in particular, but not just Western, because women in America enjoy a level of wealth and prosperity and physical security through the military that women have never seen in history. And I think we see that expressed on social media platforms today. You see never an extreme of narcissism.   More on feminism today. Like we discussed, feminism is the ultimate hate supremacist movement. It's a hate movement against 3.8 billion men. It's a supremacist movement for women. No other movement in history has gotten, has scaled to that level. Usually it's racial or religious or political or geographic or something. This is gender. This is sex. I know we hear there's 97 genders. I don't think so. I was going to, of course. But feminism as morph has mutated and morphed and shapefisted into that. That's sick. Hating the opposite sex. They always, of course, say they'll claim anybody in the man's sphere that has any controversial ideas.  No, I don't.    Very few men in the man's sphere, this is like normal discourse, they don't lash out at women instantaneously and say, you must hate men. Maybe you should, but most men don't do that. This is a distinctly feminist thing that they do. It's projection. And they even, we'll get into it more here in a second, but it's supremacism. They march in the streets now. The future is female. I say the future is masculine for a reason. I don't say the future is men. I don't say the future is male. I say the future is masculine. Masculinity is a set of characteristics that guide and lead. It revolves around one half of the population. Sure, but it's inclusive. We love women. Women love masculinity too. Most of them. Going more into it, feminism is a toxic culture where on men, masculinity, boys, fathers, and family, toxic masculinity, of course, as Rolla pointed out, quickly became all masculinity is toxic. That narrative, toxic masculinity lasted for what a year or two. Now all masculinity is toxic.  A little bit, a lot of it, all of it.   They're like, nope, done right back over here. Crazy. It's a rebellion against nature. It's a rebellion against fact that men and women are different. They hate this fact. I think this is one of the cornerstones of what feminists hate and what they're war with.  Whether you go that far, I think it's important. This is a fact. Men and women are different. Our difference is polarizes and they make us get along and cooperate and be compatible. They make the, I mean, they make, for example, sex, they make it beautiful. We're attracted to things that we don't have. Very few men wake up and say, oh, I want a strong, independent woman in my life. Why would we want that? We bring strength at the table. They want strength. They're attracted, of course, to strong, confident men. Not to the way around. I got to drink some feminist tears, hang on. It's a rebellion against nature. I believe feminists and feminism in particular is a toxic ideology independent of the individuals involved. It's a hatred of nature and of masculinity. We're the placeholders of that. We're like in the moment that. So that's why they hate men as well. But really it's against nature and it's against masculinity and even themselves. I think it's a disease of civilization, psychologically equivalent to something like heart disease, diabetes, obesity, things that we see exploding today because of the way people choose to live. Feminism is a philosophy. It's a core set of beliefs that is infected to the West. But it's psychological instead of physical. At the end of the day, though, it's very similar. A disease of civilization. Feminism is extreme and radicalizing a young woman. You see New York Times, the new editorial board, hate, you'll kill all men. You see Christian mothers are sick talking about open castration or castration of men for irresponsible evacuations.  It's getting worse every day, every month, every year. 10 years ago it wasn't really as bad when I started this company or 12 years ago. Now it's just out of control. I also believe we'll talk more about this soon that we've lost a generation of women, millennial women, not all of them, but a lot of them, many of them. That's the first time that's happened. You've seen feminism. You've seen that with men as well, and I think we respond more positively. Feminism has compounded for the first time across multiple generations. Men have responded with the suction community, which spawned into the man's sphere, the red pill, and so on. Women don't have that.  Most of them will not self-repair in my opinion. Men are. We are responding positively in a healthy manner with the man's sphere itself, especially the red pill in my personal judgment. But I have plenty of love for the pickup community as well, where I got my start, many of you as well. I believe that we're nearing total collapse of gender relations in this country. It's severely dysfunctional, and the future of America is uncertain at this point because of this fact. For more information on feminism and how toxic to become at this scale, you can see our speakers like Roland Tomasi and Socrates, as well as Defend Mollinu and Blackpigeon Speaks on YouTube, both big YouTube channels with great videos on feminism, criticizing it in very rational, slowly constructed ways that are easy to understand. It's a lot of information. Highly recommend looking those up in addition to our speakers. Defend Mollinu with feminism and Blackpigeon Speaks with feminism as well. Let's talk about this. Let's talk about pink pussy hats, right? So we see women now marching in the streets by the millions, around the world, by the millions, but in America especially, right? They put on these pink pussy hats and they march around saying the future is female. The future is still female.  But you change the color hat to pink and you change white to female. Oh, you're so brave.  So courageous. That's disgusting.  That has become normalized for American women today.      Sicker than this.  But fucking, this is right now, man. This is gone. The pink KKK. So you'll see me on Twitter if you guys follow me at Beach Muscles, other triggering name, right? They don't dream of beach muscles. This is what, this is, this is right now, all the time. The pink KKK. That's what feminisms become, a hate movement and supremacist movement for women. Feminism destroys women. As I discussed, we've lost a generation of women, in my opinion. These women will fail to success, successfully pair bond. They will fail a family formation. I would estimate maybe 10% are intact and avoided the worst of feminism. Another 10 to 20% will self repair somehow. That's time sensitive. Women are on a tight biological reproductive timeline. Men are not. The other 80% are varying degrees of severely damaged and brainwashed by feminism. I don't believe they're going to make it out. You can be more optimistic than me about that. I'm not.  Gen Z is next. Gen X is not quite as bad, in my opinion. So feminism took down an entire generation of women and nearly the men too. No positive counter movement exists right now for women. To my knowledge, there's nothing. And that's a shame. We're going to talk about this image here. So this is a some blogger, a female blogger on the internet, right? A transform wife. This went viral a few months ago. She put out an image of a young woman smiling and said that men prefer debt-free virgins without tattoos. This today, whether or not you like tattoos on girls is irrelevant, right? Debt-free virgins that don't have a PhD in gender studies or some bullshit without tattoos, this is rebellion today.  This is the rebel today. I think we need a positive counter movement. We need something positive for women. Destroying feminism is a key to doing that. But in the meantime, we need something along with it as well. We need to make women great again. Now, I'll say this too. Regardless of how you voted in 2016, I don't actually care that much. Because with this stuff and with this, you need to take all politics and policy stuff, put it to the side. This is about gender relations. This is about men. This is about women. This is about femininity and masculinity. This is a good starting point. This should not be a rebel. This should be fairly normal.  So let's make women great again. Shifting gears a little bit, back to 21 Studios update. Last year, Socrates and I unveiled the plans to construct 21 Studios, right here in Orlando, Florida, Central Florida. That's going to be a multimillion-dollar production facility very similar to this that enables year-round filming and year-round events. Not once a year or twice a year or three times a year. Every month, maybe more. We are cleaning up the legal framework of the company to take on major investors at this time. That's gotten significant progress, and Socrates and I have been talking a lot more about doing this or progressing along this path. In 2019 and 2020, I believe we're going to start getting that funding in place. And we're moving along in that direction. It's going to take time, though. This will not be built next year, not in 2020. It will be in the 2020s. So progress has been made in removing the right positive direction on that. In particular, I wanted to go over this. This is something that Roland encouraged me to include in this talk very, very much. I'm glad he did. 21 Studios, so basically, we're bashing feminism, looking at a lot of the negatives. The future is uncertain at best in a lot of ways. Like, where is this country going to be a year from now? I don't think anybody knows, with complete certainty. Nevertheless, the Manisphere has had some major positive developments over the past year. In particular, my company, 21 Studios, we've seen revenue jump over 250% approximately. This is part of it. We've seen from 2017 to 2018, 250% revenue growth. This event itself physically has doubled.  For a 12-year-old company, this kind of growth is astounding. Our subscribers on YouTube and all social media, but particularly YouTube, we gained 63,000, lost like 14,000 or whatever. So we've gained over 50,000 subscribers in one year. Not bad. Richard Cooper and I are racing for 200,000. I think I'm going to win. Where is he? Over there. But he might beat me. He's doing really good too.  We could be deleted any day. Just like that. I don't think we will. We've been fine for 11 years now. Zero problems at YouTube. But we'll see. In particular as well, though, the Red Man Group. So in my talk last year, I advocated for in the Manisphere and particularly the Red Pill, more media, more podcasts, more blogs, more books, everything like that they could produce, right? Rolla got together with me and Richard Cooper. We started the Red Man Group. This has been beyond my wildest expectations. This is like the hottest new thing in the Red Pill in the Manisphere.  So this exceeded what I had in mind. And there's other stuff too. It's not just the Red Man Group. Lots of podcasts, events, you know, Hunter Drew is a really good example too. Lots of positive developments, growth in the Manisphere and the Red Pill. This is in large part how we win the culture war over time. We have to drown feminism and content, positive ideas, and positive media. For men in particular, women follow men lead. We keep making men stronger, more powerful, more healthy, more game aware, more Red Pill aware. We could win this war. It's going to take time. That's Seneca Falls Convention was in 1848. Women got the vote in 1920. Whatever shitty elements went along with that in the manner they did it, took a long time. Is it going to take us this long to win the war of feminism? I don't believe so, but it'll take a long time. Media and content and ideas and overproducing that stuff as much as we can, as fast as we can, and high-quality as we can is in large part how we do that. And the Red Man Group is a fantastic example of that. That seriously exceeded my expectations.   What is he over there? There he is.  Some content with feminism in particular or anti-feminism. These are two books I found. This one, The Rolo, the other one, maybe two. Broken, The Rise of Radical Feminism. This is a great book. Very short. We have it on sale outside after this talk. You also get on Amazon for like 10 bucks. Really good book, very short, very powerful. Also, The Feminist Lie is another one as well, right here. Highly recommend checking this book out. Educating yourself on feminism, building the knowledge up. So a lot of people say, a lot of men in the monastery, they say that feminism is one, we're fucked. There's no way out. Let it all collapse.  I don't believe we need to do that. I don't think you're never beaten until you admit it. The fact that we're here speaking on the stage, organizing by the hundreds, we're collecting millions of views across the internet. 20 of the studios does, we do anywhere from one to two million views a month. We'll do over 10 million views this year easily, all of that content. So reaching millions of men. The fact that we're doing that, we're having this event, that we're still free to do that, speak freely and defend our rights, is a very good sign. We are not beaten. We can win this. It's going to take time. It'll take years and decades to undo the damage that feminism has done, but it can be done and we can't win. The buck has to stop here.  There's some really screwy going on. But regardless, feminism has existed until now.  It has to stop. If it's not us, it's the next generation. I don't have kids yet. I don't have any sons or daughters. I do not want to see this continue and perpetuate itself into the future. Socrates said that feminism belongs in history books. I believe that as well. We have to destroy it, get rid of it. The buck has to stop here.  Enough has been dumped on future generations.  That's a stop. In particular, I believe that the key to destroying feminism of a few, but probably the most important, is the red pill. Men's rights activists have been fiercely opposed to feminism for a long time, right? They criticize it, they're trying to improve rights for men. All these things, right? They have consistently failed to do that really harshly. I sympathize with the issues, 100%. But their effectiveness is near zero. Why is that? I believe it's because they don't understand women. Now, feminism includes, you know, beta-vichy males as well.  But mostly it's women. Men's rights activists have fundamentally, they're knee-capped. They don't have the teeth to take on feminism in ways that matter over time. So they consistently get very little to nothing done. The red pill is understanding women. Men's rights activists routinely reject that. And until they accept it, they will not take on feminism and win. They will keep failing. As hard as much as their cause is legit, it doesn't matter. I also believe this is why the red pill is such a threat. The red pill recently on Reddit, the community of men, about almost 300,000, it was quarantined, basically censored on the road to being banned. I believe that's because the red pill is very dangerous. Men are being educated on a conscious level to understand women. Feminists do not want this in particular.  The red pill is the antithesis to that. Much more so than the pickup community ever was, much more so than men's rights activists in that community have ever been. And we say too that I agree that the red pill is prexology. It's the car manual to fix your car, not why you should maintain it, not what you should buy, not why you should drive it and enjoy it, how to fix it. That is what the red pill is as a concept. But it's also a community and I don't hear that talked about enough. Whether or not it was intended, the red pill is almost 300,000 men strong, plus all the auxiliary stuff rounded like 20-minute studios and other YouTube channels and movements and causes and blogs. It's a couple hundred thousand men easily. Unintentional as it may have been, that is a political entity. That is men organizing and talking and swapping notes, as we call it, and thinking about their interests, thinking about their futures, short-term, long-term, all the way through. That is dangerous. They recognize that and they want to shut it down. They may or may not end up banning it. I think it's on the road to being banned. There's a reason for that. It's very, very dangerous and a very healthy way for us.  Sam Rae's have failed. Milano's also are the hero generation, in my opinion, from what I've read on this.  Well, hey, you know what?  Let's also look, though, for a second at what MRAs have done. They are consistently doing things that, on a micro level, repel women, they compromise, they appease, they try to negotiate. The desire, of course, between men and women cannot be negotiated. These are all strategies that fail at a micro and macro level with women. MRAs do this consistently and they keep failing. A red pill, of course, does not. I think to destroy feminism, of course, first of all, no surrender, ever.  No compromise, no negotiation, no appeasement, no mercy. That does not mean anything violent. This is a peaceful, lawful, cultural revolution that I want to ignite. Nevertheless, this is what it's going to take. It's going to take red pill-style masculinity, old-school masculinity, positive masculinity. That means aggression, that means anger, that means power.    Second of all, wait, I was born. Second of all, angry?  I'm watching my country being stolen from me, not just America, Canada, the West, all of it.   Angry?  You should be too.   It's destroyed dating and it's nearly destroyed relationships and family and marriage.  And be angry. In anger, there is truth and there is power. Do not apologize for it. In 2019, the war on feminism goes global. We're going back to Europe, like this image. We're going back to Europe. Feminities have overrun Europe, per usual. The Americans and Canadians are coming. We're a bit late. It happens. Better late than never, right? Feminism is of course infected Europe as well. We'll be going to Poland, Eastern Europe, Central Europe. We used to go to Sweden and London back in the day. We've had this little bit of fourth European event coming up in 2019 in the spring. Sweden, of course, this point is impossible. They proclaimed that they were the first feminist government in the world. Zero chance for going back there. London, the United Kingdom is now banning public speakers like Roush V. He's not a speaker of this event, but he could be. If we had an event there and invited him, he literally could not go. If I tried to put on an event there, we could have half a dozen speakers and it would be banned from entering the country.  So we cannot even have a third UK convention for the 21 convention. So we have to go elsewhere. We'll be going to Poland. We'll also be doing an event, of course, in Orlando again, right here, not this venue, but down the road. And beyond that, we'll keep expanding. More events, more content, more videos, more speakers. So the war on feminism goes global. The culture war. Even considering it though being a peaceful culture war, you have to remember that a culture war is a war. How do we know that? A gender war, even. How do we know that a gender war and a culture war is a war? Well, it's in the name. Whether it's peaceful or violent, it needs to be peaceful. Regardless, a war is a war.  We need to fight back. We need to defend ourselves. With that said, the future is still masculine. The future is masculine and it will become hell or high water. That depends on me. That depends on you. That depends on you. That depends on our speakers. That depends on all of us. If we don't do it, it's dumped on kids in the next generation or even less prepared to deal with it than we are. That's my speech. Thank you very much. Appreciate your time. I do have one more thing. I do have one more comment. So this is Roller's third book, Positive Masculinity, the Rational Mail. With Fighting Feminism, you guys need to really amp it up. He has a fourth book coming out. A lot of you are probably going to buy it. That's fantastic. When this fourth book comes out of his volume or his series, you don't buy one, you buy 10. If you can, you buy 50.  It's very bitter candy, a little sour, but it's good for you. It's good for your friends, too. Socrates has a book coming out. When that book comes out, you don't buy one. You buy 10. You buy 50. You seriously pass them out to your friends at your house who you think would benefit from it. Feminism is like Roller talked about, infected and invaded churches. Well, if you go to church and you have a few in your pocket, maybe they fall out on the way out. Accidents happen. That should happen to all the time. So be aggressive with the media, with buying books and distributing them. If you have the funds to do it, become as powerful as you can in your life.  Not me, not this event.   They are opposed to it and they're threatened by it. They should be. Becoming more powerful, more healthy, more wealthy, more game aware enables you to protect yourself, protect your loved ones, and exert force out of the culture. Whether it's through political campaigns, politicians, contributions, or just buying something like a bunch of books and passing them out to your friends. I've bought over 200 copies of his books since I've known him. And I think I've sold thousands at this point. Who knows how many more thousands will be on that? And many other speakers as well. I don't expect you to sell thousands, but if you can buy 30, 40 of these books, pass them out to your friends all day long. Never mind the fact that these are published on Amazon. Bruce just got banned.  Don't, don't risk that. These are hard to print. These are self-published. Buy as many of these as you can because you can't burn them. You can't ban them without burning them. With that said, that's my speech. I'll take questions off camera for you guys. Tonight, now, tonight, all night at the party in Socrates, all day tomorrow, and Monday if you're there as well. For everyone else, I'll answer questions maybe in the comments if they're polite on YouTube and 21U. 21U, they will be. YouTube probably not.  All right, let's give it up for Anthony. Dream Johnson. George Bruno in Orlando, Florida. With the 21 report, kind of a post-game show after the 21 convention for the past four and a half days talking to CEO and founder of 21 Studios and the 21 convention, Anthony Dream Johnson. What a great convention. Thanks, George. Thanks for having me on the show. Absolutely. Tell me about your initial impressions. Here we are. The room is being emptied out. Everything's coming off the walls. Things are getting packed up in boxes. People are getting ready to go to the airport. Now that you have a chance to just take a breath, what are you thinking? And have a drink. What are you thinking? A couple different, not so much thinking, pretty burned out, obviously. Emotionally, all the stuff, the professional stuff going on. Busy, you know, it was crazy or busy, busy. But I think about the, I try to reflect on my emotional state at the end of every event. And each event is different, but even in those differences, there's a consistent theme. For me, it's always an element of sadness. I see each event is like a living thing that is built and built and prepared and prepared, but then it's born, it lives and it dies.  I remember actually in Australia when I met Mike McNally, there was a moment and we had a really huge room that he was badass. And this event reminds me a lot of that event, like a big turning point. That was our first event in Australia. And we had three, first year, we had three events. So it reminds me of that sadness, but it's not, it's not an ugly sadness or a bitter sadness. It's like a beautiful sadness. This event was this unbelievably, it was unbelievably epic and badass. This surpassed even the 10 year anniversary, which was a high mile milestone. I agree. That was my last year, the 10th anniversary event, was my first year at the event. And I will say this was, and that was excellent. This wasn't just one notch better. It was out of the ballpark. And everybody and our producer can attest to this in all of the interviews. When I asked people what their impressions were, everyone was saying it was, there was a lot of moving parts, a finely oiled machine, people staying on time, getting whisked from stage to studio. And just everything, like there was no detail was left unattended to from security. I don't think I even had to like push a door open. There were people at every, people would just see a shadow approaching a door and open a door for me. And no door was left to slam.  We duct tape the ledges on the outside so it's quiet when it closes. Just every single detail. It was, well right from the first minute what I saw was an auditorium which reminded me of a TV studio. And having been in broadcasting for many years, it just reminded me of a major network studio. The work that went into that was amazing.  I mean, in terms of the professionalism and the details and everything, you stepped the game of our speakers this year. They're going to look better. They do look better in camera mode. And the final versions, we edit them, produce them, the perfect final versions, those are going to look awesome. Like that extra two, one, two percent was what we need for the speakers. It really was amazing. Just little things like doing the hair and makeup and getting people looking good and rolling the lint and just, you know, I brought in my ear trimmers for people, just things like that. Even the show though, I think you're the best host we've ever had by far with full respect. Full respect to our past hosts. Thank you. You're the level of maturity and wisdom and experience that we need for a show like this. Great. Thank you. Killed it. It's my pleasure. My pleasure. I noticed a lot of the speakers, they're also on other speaking circuits. They speak at other conferences and so forth. And it was unanimous amongst the guys that speak throughout the year that this was the most together, organized, efficient, effective. The only thing I can say is, finely tuned machine that they've ever been part of. We are the terminator of the manasphere. We certainly are. You're not kidding. You are not kidding. The way I like to describe it, I was talking to, I think one of the volunteers this morning and you're an attendee. I like to treat the attendees and everyone here, not just the attendees, the attendees, the speakers, the staff, everyone, even the crew that, you know, from outside companies and stuff, everyone like gold and like family, to the best extent that I can. I'm not literally family, but I try to treat them like I would a cousin. Someone actually, I care about bloodlines. And I think that's what shows us that's part of what makes this event so not just run well, but feel like it runs well. And so it's the physicality of it. It is running well. And then it's also like there's actual care and a time with that too behind it. Yes. Technically, it was superior. And I've worked in multi-multi-million-dollar studios. And here we are in a hotel that you turned into a studio. Oh, yeah. The auditorium. Gorilla Warfare. Gorilla Culture Warfare. 100%. Unbelievable. There was nothing unprofessional about it. As a matter of fact, I find it to be even more professional than as a, as a watcher of a lot of interview shows and some of the technical stuff. This was right up there with everything that I love. Oh, we're just getting started, man. It's only 12 years old. I just hit 30 and went to almost 40. Oh, it's going to be amazing. Oh, yeah. It's going to be amazing.  Thanks to this guy. That's right. That's right. Yep. As far as next year is concerned, you said we're going to have another one in the States and one in Eastern Europe. Did I hear you correctly? That's right. Poland would be a July 2019. That is amazing. That would be our, that'll be our first event in Europe in a while, but our fourth event for 21con in total. We had our first one in 2010 and then one again in 2011, 2012. So it'll be our fourth European event. So we have a lot of fans in Eastern Europe, don't we? Yeah. Oh yeah. All over Europe. Yeah. Yeah. Definitely. I think we'll get pretty much all over European fans are going to go to that event. That's amazing. That is absolutely amazing. What was your favorite part of the event?  That's a good question.  I mean, the event literally, as far as I'm concerned, the event's not even done yet. This is the final little bit of it. And even the main conference room, the auditorium, that just got wrapped up now. It would be a combination of like, maybe my own talk.  I really enjoyed Rolo Tomasi's talk. And then I really enjoyed the red man group the whole day today. There are those episodes in the barber shop. The grooming we just did with the shaving, what shape tutorial? That was interesting. Yeah. It was interesting. I love experimenting at the event with filming and new speech styles and workshops and stuff. So between the panels with RMG and then your stuff today, this whole day was like Monday, basically the bonus day was like an experiment day. And I love doing that. I love experimenting. You feel it was a success?  Hell yeah. And we'll do it again. I was as soon as possible. Yeah. Yeah. That's amazing.  It's going to be badass. Oh, I love that. I love taking risks, especially when they pay off. And I think this one really did pay off. Yeah. About the three sessions of red man group. You feel it went well? It went really well. Yeah.  I knew it was going to look badass. I tried telling some of the guys in red man group the key figures that are on it more consistently. You know, Rollo, Richard, Ryan, and Donovan. I tried to amp it up because I knew none of them are a director. So I know this is going to be really badass. I know that. So I knew that they wouldn't quite get it no matter what I told them. I was like, I'll try to help to set them up. They're not going to get it. Yeah.  But even when I saw it, I was like, damn. So the optics of it were incredible. Oh, yeah. Technically the way he produced it with the budget he had and the timing and the available time to do it. And he set that up on the fly. That came out really well. I think that elevated both the convention, our ability to produce content for second parties like that, as well as the red man group is itself as a new media entity, a new show. I knew it would do. It's been a, you know, Google hangout online kind of thing throughout the past year. We've done it.  But those episodes are going to elevate it to a new level.  People that are not good people. The everyone together added a synergy that, and I love the Google hangout version. Yeah, totally. It's the next best thing to being in person. But being in person was amazing. I mean, I could see flying people in and over three days just slamming out, you know, like 20 episodes and just, you know, six months worth of red man. What I suspected right before we did it, and I was talking to someone, Ryan, some other guests on it, I was like, I bet we're going to go, we only, these are short episodes. These are 80, 90 minutes. Usually we do like two hours plus on the Google hangout. But I think we got even more content in in a shorter amount of time because it was in person online. It tends to slow down because it's like switching.  So I was really happy about that. We got long, fairly long episodes in general, shorter for red man group and what we're used to. But we got even more content. It was faster on the fly. It was responsive. It was a live audience like a TV show. So it was really fun. And the panel, all three groups were so different. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. It's just the diversity of thought. The optical diversity. You had young, you had old, you had black, you had white, you had just everything. Bald, bearded, fat, tall, short, whatever. It was visually interesting. Yeah, it was. It was. I can't wait to watch it. It'll be actually interesting to watch.  But the reality is we have real diversity genuinely in ideas, which is where it matters. But even physically too, you see different races, religions, I'm an objective as atheists. But we also have hardcore Christians up there, and we'll get along. And then black, white, Jew, Asian, whatever, whatever. It doesn't matter. And not everybody agrees with everybody. But we agreed on having a great show and being, we believe in free speech. That's right. And we believe in free expression of ideas as well. And that's that is, I mean, we're, I think, a shining light on that, but that's becoming becoming rare today. So for us to put that in that show and see that so vividly is going to be really badass. I think the internet's going, some of the internet's going to love it, and a lot of it's going to hate it, because it's expressing that the freedom of speech and the First Amendment so strongly, among such a diverse cast of characters with, pretty strange, not strange, but unique personalities too. In addition to the ideas, in addition to the diversity of the physicality of it, it's a lot of fun. That's a really fun little show we got going. I like how the red man group acts as a feeder for everybody's social media outlets, and how everybody's social media outlets act as a feeder for the red man group. They just kind of feed each other. Yep. We've been trying to nail a podcast, like the report, I think we're nailing out the interview, the convention speeches we've nailed, but the podcast selling, we've never quite nailed the 21 radio. Right. And I think red man group is the solution to that. We're, I think we have to need, with 21 studios, we need to focus on other content and then empower second party companies like red man group to do that.  We certainly did. And you're part of that. You're on the third panel with me. Excellent. Great stuff. I love how we're not an echo chamber. Yeah.  The red man group I'm talking about wasn't a bunch of guys lined up all singing the same exact tune. There was so much diversity of thought up there. And we give people the latitude to express those thoughts as long as it's consistent with the idea of reclaiming masculinity, manhood. It's important in 2018 and beyond. Men are important. Yeah. Hell yeah. And men and women are different. That's right. Men and women are different. That's right. May he rest in peace. Proud of men. You would love, you would have loved me and him, man. You guys are going really well. Yeah. What about the party the other night? We had a party at Socrates house. What are your impressions of that? It was biggest one we ever had there. He was worried the house wouldn't support it. I was like, I bet it will. And it did.  That was badass. Someone was telling me this ago. He should have been there to learn. I was like, he taught me in person up in Philadelphia lives. Because they already had that workshop. Honestly, I thought I was going to have seriously four or five, six people. I really did not think it was going to be four and five deep all the way around. Yeah. I'm not surprised. And then everybody at the end wanting a picture of me while they're holding their pipe. So that was kind of kind of a fun thing. And that's how organizations grow. And I think everyone with this organization were young enough. I'll speak for other people, not for myself. You're pretty young here now.  I couldn't believe it. I know it. You're the young crowd. I'm one of the young guys here. I thought I was going to be one of the oldest. But technologically, it's just great how everybody is up to speed with social media outlets and hashtagging and so forth. And it really, really is a media organization where everybody is their own director of media relations. Yeah. I think it's great, too, that we can build it. I've built this company since I was 17 years old. And I didn't think about it at the time when I started it. But I've been building it in an age when mainstream media is collapsing, which is fantastic.  And then we're building something actually better that's truthful and focused on reality and facts and reason and open debate in a marketplace of ideas. So it's really, it's really fun building it and doing it right in this time where it's so controversial to do it. I think in the future, this company kind of company will be more or less the norm. Yeah. At least much will have the cultural discourse to be much more slanted in this direction. If it's going to be controversial, this would be pretty normal. You know, I love how we're getting the message out. You know, in the 60s, the three biggest networks were ABC, CBS and NBC. Now the three biggest networks are YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook. And of course, you can add Twitter to that as well.  So it's not that big of a deal anymore to get on television because we're reaching more people. Everybody has a production company they can hold in their hand. That's right. That's a good way to put it. That's a really good way to put it. I like that. Yeah. And I think we're really good at getting that message out individually and collectively as well. Yeah. What are your hopes and dreams for next year? Next year, I want to have at least 500 to 10 days between both events. I think we can pull out both events very, very well, even better than this year, which was the best event we've ever done by far. So we can have those events at that size without compromising the quality, integrity, and the product itself and the design. I treat the event as like a product, almost like a physical item. And I'm obsessed with making it the best thing I can. I do like helping men. That is a part of what I do, obviously. But it's not my primary focus. It's design and product quality and the service quality.  So I'm excited for that. And I think I can do that at that size next year. No problem. And I think we're going to have it too. I like there was a lot of moving parts this year. Yeah. And everybody played their role super well and didn't deviate from it. Like an orchestra. It was amazing. I don't have an instrument. I'm a conductor or whatever and just play with the wand. But yeah, it works pretty well. And there was a good chain of command too. I felt that there was a good respect for chain of command. There wasn't a lot of like rogue stuff going on. Yeah. And if there was anything that was a little bit deviating, it was corrected immediately. Oh, yeah. Yeah. I think my guys, my team, you, you know, the internal team, the AV team, all these guys, they're focused on getting the work done. And from that, I think men fall into hierarchies and they're pretty cooperative about it. No, we're not addicts about it. Yeah. Yeah. That's, that's really good to see. And I think we used to be more normal back in your grandfather's generation or my grandfather's generation. Yes. So we're bringing that back in that that's a good thing. You know, in the military, they say you salute the rank, not the person. And in days of old, when one army would surrender to another, commanders of opposing armies would meet and salute each other. Yeah. Even though one was surrendering, the victor would still salute the commander of the army that was surrendering because he was respecting the rank. Damn. That's pretty badass. And I felt that that was happening here. I felt everyone was working with the chain of command. And no one had to repeat themselves. So operationally, I think this was a good test run for future growth. I couldn't put it better myself. Yeah. We're going to grow a lot next year. Yeah. We had two events planned and that's, I think we'll have even more planned in 2020. Tell us about the products that are going to be put out as a result of this event, the speeches, the podcast. What's going to be happening? Well, we're going to amp up our pipeline. So our content goes to the pipeline. So we film it, you know, the first part of the pipeline is filming it right here live. And then after that, we have to edit it, play with it. We have a lab during the event now too, but that's kind of separate. So we have to edit it, play with it, perfect it, export it. And then from there, we put it through the pipeline. It's going to go to 21 University first. That's our video platform. Right after that, we put our previews on YouTube and BitShoot. And after that, we put out the full versions on YouTube and BitShoot, unless we get banned. So basically, it's a process of, you know, super premium quality experience and then distributing that out forward onto the internet over time. And we're going to get probably every single bit of video at this event out for free eventually. That's first, first to our premium subscribers at 21 University. All these guys here, the attendees got a one year pass for free, included with a ticket. And after that, we'll put on the internet to go viral. And on top of that, we're rebuilding 21 University to better facilitate, 21 University to better facilitate all this happening. So it's kind of like, something like this TV show, you know, they film it on set, they put it out, then the movie theaters, you pay a ticket, then maybe it goes on Netflix and TV after that and stuff like that. So it's a very similar progression of how it distributes outwards in the world. That's quite incredible. And they're going to get, I think now we're easily hitting 100,000, 200,000 views per speech, main speech. But that's, that's a big jump from previous years. It used to be like, you know, 50,000 stuff like that. Yeah. So I think next year we'll see speeches, even the bar, you know, the, the tutorial you just gave, that'll hit easily between three channels. If we do all three of them, easy 300,000 views easily over a quarter million, bigger than a mega church by far, bigger than football stadium or something. Absolutely. Absolutely. And I expect also we'll get at least one or two speeches out of this event with over a million views on YouTube. Easy. Interesting. Yep. Your speech, your keynote. Let's talk about that. Oh yeah. Where did that inspiration come from? It was moving. It was powerful. The finale was quite incredible. Thank you. Quite incredible. And the, I'm an observer of the audience as well as the person on stage. And I was looking at faces and they were mesmerized. Damn. I couldn't see them. The lights are on. Yeah. You know, right. It was, yeah. Yeah. I think that's going to go far. Oh yeah. I think so too. I think it's going to go far. Thank you. Well, it's the end of several days of a convention. And I want to see you here in 2019. It's going to change your life. You're going to be in for a treat. You've been putting it off for a couple years. Now it's time to get off that couch and take action on the things that have inspired you. This is George Bruno with the 21 report with Anthony Dream Johnson, CEO and founder of 21 studios and the 21 convention. Thank you, Anthony. Thanks, George, for everything.


I'm Tom Everett. I am the curator of communications here at the Canada Science Technology Museum. I'm currently curating two exhibitions for the new museum. One is called Sound by Design and the other is wearable tech. The wearable tech exhibition is all about technologies that have been designed for the body. Today we have a tendency to think about wearable technology solely in terms of body worn devices that hook up to computers and connect to the internet, but there's this whole world of technology that may not hook up to computers or may not connect to digital networks, but is equally innovative, extremely complex and really important to the ways that we live our lives. What's cool about this exhibition is it allows us to showcase both. So you can expect to see things like smart watches, augmented reality glasses, biometric clothing, but you can also expect to see things like spy cameras, underwater diving equipment, prosthetic covers, and you have baby wearing technology. We even have a whole section devoted to animal wearables where you can find things like pigeon backpacks, canine search and rescue gear, tags that have been designed to listen to whales underwater. What brings these objects together is not necessarily a shared reliance on computers or digital networks, but a shared goal to allow our bodies to go places and do things that we couldn't do otherwise. So one of the first things I think people are going to notice when they walk into the wearable tech exhibition is just how interesting it's been designed. It's a super dynamic space and the artifacts really really stand out. So on the one side you'll have the nute suit, this underwater diving suit, which seems to be moving through the space. On the other side you'll have a canine search and rescue dog being lowered from the ceiling. So it's a really, it's a really inviting place to be in, a really dynamic place and I think people are going to have a lot of fun there.


This information is different when we do it immediately following the so-called January six riots The Democrats in their media began spreading the lie that multiple officers had been killed during the event They continued spreading this disinformation even weeks after the autopsy had proved He died of natural causes unrelated to the riot officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire Extinguisher during the hours long attack.  He died at the age of 42 after he was bludgeoned the fire extinguisher True to form the left repeated this lie so often that it just became Established fact in the minds of many misled people during last night's theatrical committee hearing They further discredited themselves by spreading disinformation That went completely unchallenged by anyone on this sham committee or their media mouthpieces when a former Oath Keeper Spokesperson made several providely false claims Um, I Think we need to quit mincing words and just talk about truths and what it was gonna be was an armed revolution I mean people died that day Law enforcement officers died this day. There was a gallows set up in front of the Capitol This could have been the spark that started a new civil war I think we need to quit mincing words and just talk about truths. That truth hurts, doesn't it? Oh sure Maybe not as much as jumping on a bicycle with a seat missing but it hurts I'm gonna shred these purveyors of disinformation But first check out this free coin offer the recent shootings Especially those in schools is bringing about stricter gun reform bills Congress has just passed the most significant gun reform bill we've seen in decades But as we all know bad guys won't always have access to guns Unfortunately for law-abiding citizens the Second Amendment has never been more at risk of being infringed than this year a new Site is showing their support for the Second Amendment to create change and you can get in on it, too The support the second coin usually retails for $24.95 But it's currently free for a limited time to bring awareness to the issues affecting gun owners today Get your free Second Amendment coin today by going to www.supportthesecond.com That's www.supportthesecond.com Support gun owners, gun rights, and the Second Amendment Um, I I think we need to quit mincing words and just talk about truths and What it was gonna be was an armed revolution. I mean people died that day Law enforcement officers died this day. There was a gallows set up in front of the Capitol This could have been the spark that started a new civil war. You believe this story? Unreal he says quote we need to quit mincing words and just talk about truths literally everything He says after that it's either disinformation or hypothetical scenarios that never took place First let me destroy this false claim that there were functional gallows at the Capitol that were to be used on Mike Pence This is a lie the gallows were not functional It was purely symbolic just look at these pictures if any of these people went up that ladder They would stand above the actual news It's a miniature gallows a prop much like we've seen over and over from Democrats When a Republican is in the White House next not a single officer died that day as a result of the riot One died the next day of natural causes and some others committed suicide I put air quotes on that that you didn't see because it seems highly unusual to me that so many officers would end their own lives After one riot and it was actually a pretty mild riot at least compared to the insane Sustained left-wing riots instead. He's like Portland moving on he claims that they were there to start an armed revolution The only problem is only around 12 people were arrested with legal handguns But other than that out of hundreds of people nobody was armed with anything except maybe a flagpole Which by the way these people consider armed as usual They're trying to paint a mental picture and people who don't know any better when they say armed insurrection It's a lot like mostly peaceful or assault weapon Let's also not forget that the only person there who was shot was an unarmed Trump supporter named Ashley Babbitt Who was literally surrounded by police and did not need to be shot Then lastly he finishes by saying quote this could have been the spark that started a new civil war It could have been a spark to start world peace It could have been the time that aliens decided to invade earth In fact the Democrat riots between 2015 and 2020 could have sparked a civil war getting rid of the electoral college Could spark a civil war, but the Democrats in the media seem really excited about doing that who cares with this guy's hypothetical Speculations are I don't care None of that ever happened But it just goes to show what a totally partisan one-sided farce these hearings are notice how nobody in the media is correcting this disinformation Instead they're just reporting it like it's true including this NBC reporter who willingly tweeted it out I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but never ever trust the media or politicians All right folks go out there and share this video Maybe we can snap some people out of their Orwellian media induced haze also make sure to punch that like button Subscribe and vent some frustration by leaving a comment. Thanks a lot


What's up guys? So firstly, thank you to all my new subscribers. It's been quite a rapid growth recently And I try and keep this video fairly short, but as you know, I tend to run over a bit. I like to talk about this topic So basically I have had a lot of questions recently from all sorts of people Phrases in different ways, but relating to sleep paralysis and most of the time they just want to know Can you turn sleep paralysis into a lucid dream?  So that's the reason we experience sleep paralysis sleep paralysis comes with they sort of go hand-in-hand with hallucination and Visualizations imagery.  They're the scary things. So people report seeing, you know Demons or giant spiders dark figures all this sort of thing The reason for this among other things and this is just again my opinion is because when you're paralyzed your natural response by from your body and mind is That you can't react in the face of danger if something bad were to happen when you know, you're paralyzed You know that you can't do anything about it So therefore you have all these sorts of panic running around your head and that combined with your half asleep state Means you're gonna hallucinate and see bad negative scary things. It's nothing to worry about They aren't really there But you can turn this experience of sleep paralysis into a lucid dream when you're experiencing sleep paralysis Your muscles are already paralyzed.  See whatever you are seeing don't don't judge it Don't you know try and change it or panic or escape or anything like that and just sort of go with it Think about what you would like to see visualize, you know shapes. I've done a video about visualization before Think about what you'd like to dream about if you'd like to dream about being on island being on a desert island you know with a beautiful scenery in the background then imagine that and Sooner or later it will start to manifest you'll start to sort of enter that dream Through the sleep paralysis, but this is the first stage where you're you know You're aware of the fact that you can't move you're aware of the fact that you're not dreaming and you're sort of in that in-between Stage where you're seeing scary things, but you can't move or do anything about it That's the top the hardest stage you just need to wait that out Just be aware that you can't actually get her nothing's gonna cause you any harm at this point You just need to be patient and it will lead into a lucid dream So a lot of people are saying that they you know, they they panic and they get very scared When this happens, it's nothing to be scared of okay It's just a natural part and the more experience you have the more you practice this the easier It will be to just think okay. I'm in sleep paralysis now It doesn't really matter because I'm about to enter a lucid dream Okay, the hallucinations you see during sleep paralysis are not real They can't do you any harm. So I hope this answers your question because Loads of people. I mean loads of people have been emailing me almost exactly the same thing about sleep paralysis Is it scary? Is it dangerous and how can I turn sleep paralysis into a lucid dream? So hopefully this is answered that for you. If you have any questions, please send them in Don't forget to subscribe and I'll see you in the next video


Good afternoon. How's everybody doing? So this is my first time at Slush. I thought I'd bring some sparkle with me. My name is Stacia Carr, and I am director of engineering for the size and fit team at Zalando. Today, I'm going to share some stories with you about how we tackle a really big problem with a fully cross-functional business unit. Now, you might be asking yourselves, what is a fully cross-functional business unit? How many of you in the audience are actually founders or working in a startup? Can I get a quick show of hands? So most of you. So what we're describing here is actually what looks like a startup. My team is 24 people. And what we mean by fully cross-functional or interdisciplinary is that we all have different skill sets. We've got data scientists, research engineers, product folks, designers, business people. And what unifies all of us is that we're tackling the biggest customer-facing problem in the fashion world, which is finding the right size and fit. About one in three of all of Zalando's purchases or return purchases are returned for size-related reasons. And whether you're shopping online or offline, you know it's hard to find what fits. Today, we offer our customers two algorithmic products that are size advice. One is a personalized size recommendation for customers that shop with us regularly. We can tell them exactly what size to buy. And the second product is a more generalized piece of size advice that tells customers if an item runs a little bit big or small. So over the last couple of years, my team has put a nice dent in this challenging problem for our customers. And what I'm going to share with you is how we did it. Before we came together as a team, we actually worked in separate parts of the Zalando business. We had business people working in one office in East Berlin and the tech people working in another office in East Berlin. Business people were typically running analysis to understand why items were being returned. They were really focused on numbers, very sales oriented, and also looking at our supply chain. So how do returns actually impact our logistics? The tech folks, very data science driven, trying to understand what can we do with the data that we had. And when the two teams actually tried to work together, it was really a struggle. They didn't have a single purpose that they shared. It was a lot like a tug of war. The other challenge that we had was that both teams were actually working with very similar sets of data. And both teams were analyzing that data. So business folks would find a problem. They would run an analysis in their tool chain to try to validate a hypothesis to solve it. And they would run over to the data science team and say, here, take this. A little bit like throwing this package over the fence. Please do x, y, and z. And as we all know, nobody likes having requirements or sets of data thrown over the fence. It's just not super productive. The other challenge with this setup of having our discipline separated was that each team had a very narrow focus. The business folks were trying to make impact in this quarter. The data science folks were looking a little bit further down the pipe, but nobody had really stepped back completely and said, oh my god. If we can really go deep into the size and fit problem, which, by the way, was introduced through the advent of industrial manufacturing, what could we disrupt? What could we change? How could we change the lives of our customers and really impact change in our business? So about almost a year and a half, two years ago, Zalando made a very big change in how we organized ourselves. We actually pulled together these cross-functional teams all centered around our customers' most important problems. So I was asked to lead this particular team. And the first thing I did was I said, OK, we've got all these different disciplines. Together, we need to build our strategy. So we took about six weeks, and we formed small cross-functional working groups, and we wrote strategy papers together. So what did this look like? I had a team that was looking at, what are the data sets that we have today? What are the data sets that we want to build tomorrow? And what kind of algorithms do we want to explore? And that team was not just comprised of data scientists. Actually had a business person in there who was able to challenge the data scientists to make sure that they could actually fully communicate their ideas. This kind of interdisciplinary sparring actually makes everybody better. And we created a very rich strategy that informs all the work we do going forward. The second thing we did was actually pull together around our immediate work. So we form initiatives every quarter that anyone in the team can pitch, and anyone in the team can work on. Now, we absolutely review these. A lot of them get thrown away. But the idea is you don't have to be coming from one discipline or another to actually pitch ideas about what we focus on. If you've got an idea, you can describe it. You can pitch it. The third thing we did, and this may have been one of the most important, was we actually adopted a framework to understand how we think about working with data. At the end of the day, the size and fit team is a data product development team. We all work with data, whether you're using the business intelligence stack to run analysis or a side kit and Python to actually start working with data and build models. We all work with the same information. And I pulled this particular model from a great book called Agile Data Product Development 2.0. It's from their manifesto. This is just a very simple way to think about working with data regardless of the toolset that you're working with. And the thing that this did was it really encouraged the business analysts who didn't have the advanced mathematics backgrounds to regard their work as just as important as the data scientist, really leveling the playing field for everybody in the team. What were the results? It all sounds great. But how do you actually measure success when you create a team that works this way? We grew by 25% this last year. And one of the things that I invested in was actually running a psychological safety survey to make sure that everybody in the team felt like they could ask questions without feeling like they were stupid or raise concerns when they saw something that might be problematic. It's a really great tool. I highly recommend it. There's a lot of material out there that you can go online and find. You don't have to design a survey yourself. It's a great way to understand how your team is functioning. The other thing that I'm happy to say is we actually were able to put a dent in the size-related return rates. This is super important for our customers as well as for our bottom line. And then the third thing that we achieved was we created this strategic vision. It's for driving towards 2020, which seems like right around the corner today, but at the beginning of 2017, this was a big deal. So in short, what I suggest you take with you, take away with you today, if you have an interdisciplinary team, really think about choosing a great framework to unify all the disciplines working in your team. Make sure that you as a leader, and we're all leaders when we play on a team, show respect for the value that each discipline brings. Take time and build that strategy together. It's really easy, especially when you're a startup, to kind of get caught up in the excitement of trying to execute and prove your value. You've got to do another round of fundraising, but without a strategy, all of those efforts and all of those activities, you can't really guarantee that they're going to give you the impact that you're looking for. So with that, I want to encourage you all. It's a lot more fun to work together. We learn a lot more when we work across discipline, and I think the only way to really achieve game-changing accomplishments, both for our businesses and for our customers, is when you work in these diverse backgrounds. So go forth and create great interdisciplinary teams. Thank you very much.


And Vice President Harris, Majority Leader Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Mitch, I don't want to hurt your reputation, but we really are friends. And that is not an epiphany we're having here at the moment. We've always, we've always done exactly what you've said, your man of word, your word and your man of honor. Thank you for being my friend. That was the Democratic president, Joseph Rubin at Biden, pathetically praising Mitch McConnell and also publicly affirming their friendship. He's a man of honor, says Joe Biden. I mean, this is embarrassing. Imagine calling one of the most destructive political figures in modern American history, your friend. Let me tell you about your friend, Joe Biden, because of this individual in the year 2022, women might literally have to resort to coat hanger abortions again because he stole two Supreme Court seats from your party. And he's your friend. I mean, most of the damage that Mitch McConnell has caused to this country is irreparable, but what we can actually fix, what we can undo will take decades. And yet you still publicly legitimize him and call him a man of honor and say he's your friend. What is wrong with you? Is all of this meaningless? Is politics just a show to you? Because a lot of people actually have skin in the game. We actually view this as a high stakes thing. And we want you to actually fight. But this tells us that you don't care.  I mean, is there no limit to how bad Republicans can become for Democrats? Is the prerequisite to becoming a Democratic Party leader, having a humiliation fetish?  I just I don't get it. Mitch McConnell can walk up to Joe Biden and literally spit in his face.  That's how desperate he is to get the acceptance of these mouth breathing, pan-shitting psychopaths known as Republicans.  And Joe Biden would probably love it. He'd probably get off on it and thank him when he's done because that's how weird these people are. That's how psychopathic these motherfuckers are. And it's not like I'm expecting Joe Biden to publicly shame Mitch McConnell because, of course, Democrats would never breach the quorum. They're always going to remain simple, no matter what. But maybe for once, just stand up to them. I mean, my expectations aren't that unrealistic.  No cap. I hope you die, bro. Like I'm not expecting that. Joe Biden would never do that. But maybe at a minimum, at least you think we should be able to expect you to not publicly legitimize him. But we can't even get that. Democrats are just so weak, peak cuck energy. That's what Joe Biden is. One of the weakest presidents in the history of the United States. Can't even stand up to people in his own party obstructing his own agenda.   Wow, how embarrassing. Now, let me remind you what Mitch McConnell said just last week before Biden even had the opportunity to name a nomination to the Supreme Court. Best Love and a Vanity Fair explains Mitch McConnell is already out there suggesting he's not going to let Biden's yet to be named to pick to replace Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court go through. In a statement issued Thursday, the Senate Minority Leader warned that Biden had best not nominate someone too ideological, like, you know, a number of the conservative justices already on the court, or there'd be consequences. Quote, the American people elected a Senate that is evenly split at 5050. McConnell said, to the degree that President Biden received a mandate, it was to govern from the middle, steward our institutions and unite America. The president must not outsource this important decision to the radical left. The American people deserve a nominee with demonstrated reverence for the written text of our laws and our Constitution. So this is someone who has repeatedly made a mockery of you, Joe Biden. This is someone who pledged to block 100 percent of your agenda.  But this doesn't bother you. I mean, you say that Trump is an existential threat to US democracy. And that's true. But Mitch McConnell was Trump's enforcer. Trump wouldn't have been nearly as effective had it not been for Mitch McConnell right there, helping him accomplish all of the terrible things that he wanted to accomplish. But yet Joe Biden says he's a friend and a man of honor. To think that Mitch McConnell is a man of honor says a lot about your moral character. We all know that the author of the crime bill.  He's morally bankrupt. But right here, he's really telling you just how craven he is, just how desperate he is to be accepted by Republicans.   He's not trying to undo the damage he caused. He's in there groveling at the feet of Republican lawmakers trying to get their acceptance like the sycophantic little cuck that he is. And it's not just Joe Biden. Let me be clear. This is a microcosm of a bigger issue with Democrats.  Let's remember what Nancy Pelosi said about Republicans just a couple of months ago. And I say to my Republican friends, take back your party. Country needs a big, strong Republican Party. Here, I say that as a leader in the Democratic Party, but we need a big, strong Republican Party. You've done so much for our country. Take pride and take back your party. Don't have it be a cult of personality on the extreme, extreme, extreme right. Counterpoint. No, we don't need a strong Republican Party. We need the Republican Party to go the way of the dodo before this psychopathic death, cold and humanity.   So we don't need a strong Republican Party. We need them to go extinct so Democrats can be what they always wanted to be, the de facto conservative party in the United States. And then hopefully, you know, a left wing party or at least a center left party will emerge. But that's never going to happen. That's never going to happen. Why? Because Democrats won't let it happen. Democrats love Republicans.  But in actuality, they really like this because what all of this demonstrates is that politics is nothing more than a show to them. They love having the Republican Party there because that makes their jobs so much easier. I mean, think about it.  And you never have to actually do anything. You never have to violate what your donors want. You you just there's no expectation. So they love Republicans. Democrats are nothing more than seat warmers. They kind of give us a break from the craziness of Republicans. And that's all that they do. They never take us in a further direction. They never try to salvage what's left of our democracy.  These types of parties are fringe and they're gaining prominence to be sure to be sure. But I mean, the Conservative Party in Canada, nowhere near Republicans. Tories in the UK, they're bad, but they're not Republican Party bad. I don't even know if you keep is as bad as Republicans. But yet, Democrats are desperate to prop them up and legitimize them. It's just this is why they lose elections, because they are inadvertently communicating to their base that none of this actually matters. See, to a lot of people, politics is actually about survival. I don't talk about politics because I care so much about these political figures. And I want to see what Nancy Pelosi has to say about legislation.  What I care about is helping people. I want people to have health care. I want the planet to be habitable. This is about survival. It's not political theater to us, but to them, it's just the show.  And perhaps you'd be right.  They have no shame. Joe Biden should be ashamed of himself.   I mean, he's done damage to the country, too, that will take a long time to repair.    I hate Democrats so much. The hatred that I have in my heart for Democrats could probably power the entire US electrical grid. They're just worthless. They are completely worthless.


Hey, I'm Mr. Gibson here with the next lesson in cryptography. So today we're going to take a look at how we can use some mathematics specifically some statistics and probability to help us take a look at some characteristics of our text and What we call this is frequency analysis. So going back to the very first activity in the course We know that certain letters appear more often than others in the English language We're going to try and quantify that today Because having specific values are going to be very helpful for us to figure out How we can analyze cipher text more more quantitatively? So let's take a look at a few different books We're going to be working with a few books that are in the public domain Which means that we can easily pull up their entire text free of copyright So we're going to look at pride and prejudice So I ran this through some Python code and generated the following bar chart and we'll learn how to do that in this module or in this unit And this bar chart shows us that We've got a high percentage of ease that looks like somewhere between 12 and 14 percent of all letters in the book pride and prejudice are e Just under 8% or a's looks like n and o are pretty popular. So are h and i and so are r s and t And it turns out that if we were to pick a completely different book like Alice in Wonderland We see the same patterns the individual percentages might vary just a little bit But again, we see a and e are pretty high up there. So are h and i n and o and r s and t And if you go to Frankenstein again a little bit different, but most of the same patterns and little women No, different. So we're gonna see that English language as a whole has a pretty standard percentage of character distribution So we can see here This is just a table pulled off of Wikipedia that if we take a really large volume of text So maybe we take like an entire library full of books and we do this for it that the English language kind of settles down into these Percentages here so we can kind of read that fine print that a is about 8.16 7% of all letters that are in in the English language E is the highest that around 12.7 Z is pretty low at about point zero seven seven percent and we've got everything that ranges in between So this kind of bar chart on the right is what we're gonna refer to as the standard distribution of English letters And this is going to be helpful as we move forward So let's take a look at how knowing the standard distribution of the English language can help us learn a little bit about our ciphertext so here we have on the ciphertext is the Entire text of pride and prejudice run through a Caesar cipher using a key of three and I've highlighted Corresponding bars from the standard distribution so our our ease and the standard distribution are roughly 12 point something percent And we can find the corresponding bar and the ciphertext and that is mapped to H And we can see well What's what's the relationship is that those letters are three apart and if you know anything about the Caesar cipher? That shouldn't be too surprising the way that that cipher works is that we Increase the value of our plain text letter by three So if E is normally four four plus three is seven and seven maps to H and the ciphertext and we do that for all of the letters So using an additive cipher like Caesar preserves the order of our plain text when we get to the ciphertext And what I mean by that is we can see the same patterns We used to have an A and an E that were kind of relatively big spikes near each other now We have a D and an H we used to have an H and I and the plain text are in the standard distribution and now we see that at K and L and an O in the standard distribution are now at Q and R and RS and T in the plain text or the standard distribution are now at UVW in the ciphertext We can see similar patterns when if we were to use a key of seven or a key of 22 Those bars just keep shifting down wrapping around to the beginning And if what this is really helpful is that if we don't have this the plain text distribution It doesn't matter because we know the standard distribution is always going to be the same So if we were able to collect a ciphertext and we were trying to figure out What algorithm was used or what key was used we can really quickly look at this and say well Here's a ciphertext we can see those kind of order preserved spikes We can see the K and the O kind of go back to the A and the E The R and the S go back to the H and the I and so on So that's how we know it's Caesar and the fact that we know the key We can do we can figure that out by very by counting how many spots. Oh Has shifted over since we think that's from E So if if that's true if we think this high frequency spike at the letter Oh and the ciphertext maps back to E in the plain text We can just count that those are 10 units apart So that must mean that the key that was used in the Caesar cipher was 10 Now this gets a little bit trickier when we're dealing with ciphers with multiplication We do with multiplication is that we lose that order preservation of the bars We can see that here. Here's our standard distribution of characters And then here's a ciphertext created using pride and prejudice with a multiplicative key of three And we can see that while it's easy for us to identify that the M and the ciphertext likely came from the E and The standard distribution are in our plain text that that is not really enough for us to figure out the key if we didn't already know it and You can also see that even though M We think is E the other bars are kind of almost randomly scattered about they don't have the same H I spike or the NO spike or the RST spike All of those bars are really mixed in a way that makes it hard to figure it out It turns out this actually is enough for us to figure out That the key is three. We'll talk more about that in a future lesson But it does get even harder when we start looking at affine ciphers So here's a ciphertext that was created using affine with an additive key of two and a multiplicative key of seven and again We could quickly spot the likely candidate for what we think E and the ciphertext maps back to in this case Also E and the standard distribution But there's not a lot of other information just looking at this bar chart That might help us figure out what the two keys were if we didn't know them like in this situation Here's a bar chart where I didn't tell you the keys And we might be able to guess that M in this ciphertext is E in the standard distribution but That's about all we can figure out by looking at this We don't have a lot of other information that we're able to tell from the bar chart And that's how we're going to get started using frequency analysis We'll continue to build on this and find ways to to use these bar charts to help us determine the keys either Algebraically or computationally, but it's the first step in the right direction for our journey on crypt analysis Thanks for watching. We'll catch you on the next one