Section 8 of the Art of Controversy by Arthur Schopenhauer. This Learovox recording is in the public domain. Recording by Karl Manchester 2010. The Art of Controversy by Arthur Schopenhauer. Psychological observations. In the moment when a great affliction overtakes us, we are hurt to find that the world about us is unconcerned and goes its own way. As Goethe says in Tasso, how easily it leaves us helpless and alone, and continues its course like the sun and the moon and the other gods. Die Welt wie Sie so leischt. Uns Hürflos, eins am last, und Irenweg. Wie Son und Mond, and der Egoethe Geethe. Nay more. It is something intolerable that even we ourselves have to go on with the mechanical round of our daily business, and that thousands of our own actions are and must be unaffected by the pain that throbs within us. And so to restore the harmony between our outward doings and our inward feelings, we storm and shout and tear our hair and stamp with pain or rage. Our temperament is so despotic that we are not satisfied unless we draw everything into our own life and force all the world to sympathise with us. The only way of achieving this would be to win the love of others so that the afflictions which oppress our own hearts might oppress theirs as well. Since that is attended with some difficulty, we often choose the shorter way and blab out our burden of woe to people who do not care and listen with curiosity but without sympathy, and much oftener with satisfaction. Speech and the communication of thought, which in their mutual relations are always attended by a slight impulse on the part of the will, are almost a physical necessity. Sometimes, however, the lower animals entertain me much more than the average man, for in the first place, what can such a man say? It is only conceptions that is the driest of ideas that can be communicated by means of words. And what sort of conceptions has the average man to communicate if he does not merely tell a story or give a report, neither of which makes conversation? The greatest charm of conversation is the mimetic part of it, the character that is manifested, be it never so little. Take the best of men. How little he can say of what goes on within him, since it is only conceptions that are communicable. And yet a conversation with a clever man is one of the greatest of pleasures. It is not only that ordinary men have little to say, but what intellect they have puts them in the way of concealing and distorting it, and it is the necessity of practising this concealment that gives them such a pitiable character, so that what they exhibit is not even the little that they have, but a mask and disguise. The lower animals, which have no reason, can conceal nothing. They are altogether naive and therefore very entertaining if we have only an eye for the kind of communications which they make. They speak not with words, but with shape and structure, and manner of life, and the things that they set about, they express themselves to an intelligent observer in a very pleasing and entertaining fashion. It is a varied life that is presented to him and one that in its manifestation is very different from his own, and yet essentially it is the same. He sees it in its simplest form, when reflection is excluded. For with the lower animals life is lived wholly in and for the present moment. It is the present that the animal grasps. It has no care or at least no conscious care for the morrow, and no fear of death. And so it is wholly taken up with life and living. The conversation among ordinary people, when it does not relate to any special matter of fact, but takes a more general character, mostly consists in hackneyed common places which they alternately repeat to each other with the utmost complacency. Translators note, this observation is in Schopenhauer's own English. End note, some men can despise any blessing as soon as they cease to possess it. Others only when they have obtained it. The latter are the more unhappy and the nobler of the two. When the aching heart grieves no more over any particular object but is oppressed by life as a whole, it withdraws, as it were, into itself. There is here a retreat and gradual extinction of the will whereby the body which is the manifestation of the will is slowly but surely undermined, and the individual experiences a steady dissolution of his bonds, a quiet presentiment of death. Hence the heart which aches has a secret joy of its own, and it is this, I fancy, which the English call the joy of grief. The pain that extends to life as a whole and loosens our hold on it is the only pain that is really tragic. That which attaches to particular objects is a will that is broken but not resigned. It exhibits the struggle and inner contradictions of the will and of life itself, and it is comic, be it never so violent. It is like the pain of the miser at the loss of his hoard. Even though pain of the tragic kind proceeds from a single definite object, it does not remain there. It takes the separate affliction only as a symbol of life as a whole, and transfers it thither. Vaxation is the attitude of the individual as intelligence towards the check imposed upon a strong manifestation of the individual as will. There are two ways of avoiding it, either by repressing the violence of the will, in other words by virtue, or by keeping the intelligence from dwelling upon the check, in other words by stoicism. To win the favour of a very beautiful woman by one's personality alone is perhaps a greater satisfaction to one's vanity than to anything else. For it is an assurance that one's personality is an equivalent for the person that is treasured and desired and deified above all others. Hence it is that despised love that is so great a pang, especially when it is associated with well-founded jealousy. With this joy and this pain it is probable that vanity is more largely concerned than the senses because it is only things of the mind and not mere sensuality that produce such violent convulsions. The animals are familiar with lust, but not with the passionate pleasures and pains of love. To be suddenly placed in a strange town or country where the manner of life, possibly even the language, is very different from our own is at the first moment like stepping into cold water. We are brought into sudden contact with a new temperature and we feel a powerful and superior influence from without which affects us uncomfortably. We find ourselves in a strange element where we cannot move with ease and over and above that we have the feeling that while everything strikes us as strange we ourselves strike others in the same way. But as soon as we are a little composed and reconciled to our surroundings as soon as we have appropriated some of its temperature we feel an extraordinary sense of satisfaction as in bathing in cool water. We assimilate ourselves to the new element and cease to have any necessary preoccupation with our person. We devote our attention undisturbed to our environment to which we now feel ourselves superior by being able to view it in an objective and disinterested fashion instead of being oppressed by it as before. When we are on a journey and all kinds of remarkable objects press themselves on our attention the intellectual food which we receive is often so large in amount that we have no time for digestion and we regret that the impressions which succeed one another so quickly leave no permanent trace. But at bottom it is the same with travelling as with reading. How often do we complain that we cannot remember one thousandth of what we read? In both cases however we may console ourselves with the reflection that the things we see and read make an impression on the mind before they are forgotten and so contribute to its formation and nurture while that which we only remember does no more than stuff it and puff it out. Filling up its hollows with matter that will always be strange to it and leaving it in itself a blank. It is the very many and varied forms in which human life is presented to us on our travels that makes them entertaining but we never see more than its outside such as is everywhere open to public view and accessible to strangers. On the other hand human life is on its inside the heart and centre where it lives and moves and shows its character and in particular that part of the inner side which could be seen at home amongst our relatives is not seen. We have exchanged it for the outer side. That is why on our travels we see the world like a painted landscape with a very wide horizon but no foreground and why in time we get tired of it.  The disposition of the one is subjective of the other objective. The one is in the whole of his existence more in the nature of an idea which is merely presented the other more of the being who presents it. A woman with certain exceptions which need not be mentioned does not take the first step with a man. For in spite of all the beauty she may have she risks a refusal. A man may be ill in mind or body or busy or gloomy and so not care for advances and a refusal would be a blow to her vanity. But as soon as he takes the first step and helps her over this danger he stands on a footing of equality with her and will generally find her quite tractable. The praise with which many men speak of their wives is really given to their own judgement in selecting them. This arises perhaps from a feeling of the truth of the saying that a man shows what he is by the way in which he dies and by the choice of his wife. If education or warning were of any avail how could Seneca's pupil be a near-row? The Pythagorean principle that like is known only by like is in many respects a true one. Footnote See Porphyry Davita Pythagori End footnote It explains how it is that every man understands his fellow only insofar as he resembles him or at least is of a similar character. What one man is quite sure of perceiving in another is that which is common to all namely the vulgar, petty or mean elements of our nature. Here every man has a perfect understanding of his fellows but the advantage which one man has over another does not exist for the other who be the talents in questions as extraordinary as they may will never see anything beyond what he possesses himself for the very good reason that this is all he wants to see. If there is anything on which he is in doubt it will give him a vague sense of fear mixed with peak because it passes his comprehension and therefore is uncongenial to him. This is why it is mind alone that understands mind why works of genius are wholly understood and valued only by a man of genius and why it must necessarily be a long time before they indirectly attract attention at the hands of the crowd that they will never, in any true sense, exist. This too is why one man will look another in the face with the impure and assurance that he will never see anything but a miserable resemblance of himself and this is just what he will see as he cannot grasp anything beyond it hence the bold way in which one man will contradict another. Finally it is for the same reason that great superiority of mind isolates a man and that those of high gifts keep themselves aloof from the Volga and that means everyone. For if they mingle with the crowd they can communicate only such parts of them as they share with the crowd and so make themselves common. Nay, even though they possess some well-founded and authoritative reputation amongst the crowd they are not long in losing it together with any personal weight it may give them since all are blind to the qualities on which it is based but have their eyes open to anything that is Volga and common to themselves. They soon discover the truth of the Arabian proverb joke with a slave and he'll show you his heels. It also follows that a man of high gifts in his intercourse with others must always reflect that the best part of him is out of sight in the clouds so that if he desires to know accurately how much he can be to anyone else he has only to consider how much the man in question is to him this as a rule is precious little and therefore he is uncongenial to the other as the other to him. Goethe says somewhere that man is not without a vein of veneration. To satisfy this impulse to venerate even in those who have no sense for what is really worthy substitutes are provided in the shape of princes and princely families nobles, titles, orders and money bags vague longing and boredom are closer kin when a man is dead we envy him no more and we only half envy him when he is old misanthropy and love of solitude are convertible ideas in chess the object of the game namely to checkmate one's opponent is of arbitrary adoption of the possible means of attaining it there is a great number and according as we make a prudent use of them we arrive at our goal we enter on the game of our own choice nor is it otherwise with human life only that here the entrance is not of our choosing but is forced upon us and the object which is to live and exist seems indeed at times as though it were of arbitrary adoption and that we could if necessary relinquish it nevertheless it is in the strict sense of the word a natural object that is to say we cannot relinquish it without giving up existence itself if we regard our existence as the work of some arbitrary power outside us we must indeed admire the cunning by which that creative mind has succeeded in making us play so much value on an object which is only momentary and must of necessity be laid aside very soon and which we see more over on reflection to be altogether vanity in making I say this object so dear to us that we eagerly exert all our strength in working at it although we know that as soon as the game is over the object will exist for us no longer and that on the whole we cannot say what it is that makes it so attractive nay it seems to be an object as arbitrarily adopted as that of checkmating our opponent's king and nevertheless we are always intent on the means of attaining it and think and brood over nothing else it is clear that the reason of it is that our intellect is only capable of looking outside and has no power at all of looking within and since this is so we have come to the conclusion that we must make the best of it End of Section 8 Section 9 of the Art of Controversy This Libravox recording is in the public domain recording by Karl Manchester 2010 The Art of Controversy by Arthur Schopenhauer On the Wisdom of Life Atherisms The Simple Philistine believes that life is something infinite and unconditioned and tries to look upon it and live it as though it left nothing to be desired By method and principle the learned Philistine does the same He believes that his methods and his principles are unconditionally perfect and objectively valid so that as soon as he has found them he has nothing to do but apply them to circumstances and then approve or condemn But happiness and truth are not to be seized in this fashion It is phantoms of them alone that are sent to us here to stir us to action The average man pursues the shadow of happiness with unwaired labour and the thinker, the shadow of truth and both, though phantoms are all they have possessing them as much as they can grasp Life is a language in which certain truths are conveyed to us Could we learn them in some other way we should not live Thus it is that wise sayings and prudential maxims will never make up for the lack of experience or be a substitute for life itself Still they are not to be despised for they too are a part of life nay, they should be highly esteemed and regarded as the loose pages which others have copied from the book of truth as it is imparted by the spirit of the world But they are pages which must needs be imperfect and can never replace the real living voice Still less can this be so when we reflect that life or the book of truth speaks differently to us all like the apostles who preached at Pentecost and instructed the multitude appearing to each man to speak in his own tongue recognise the truth in yourself recognise yourself in the truth and in the same moment you will find to your astonishment that the home which you have long been looking for in vain which has filled your most ardent dreams is there in its entirety with every detail of it true in the very place where you stand it is there that your heaven touches your earth What makes us almost inevitably ridiculous is our serious way of treating the passing moment as though it necessarily had all the importance which it seems to have It is only a few great minds that are above this weakness and instead of being laughed at have come to laugh themselves The bright and good moments of our life ought to teach us how to act right when we are melancholy and dull and stupid by preserving the memory of their results and the melancholy, dull and stupid moments should teach us to be modest when we are bright for we generally value ourselves according to our best and brightest moments and those in which we are weak and dull and miserable we regard as no proper part of us To remember them will teach us to be modest humble and tolerant Mark my words once for all my dear friend and be clever Men are entirely self-centred and incapable of looking at things objectively If you had a dog and wanted to make him fond of you and fancy that of your hundred rare and excellent characteristics the mongrel would be sure to perceive one and that that would be sufficient to make him devoted to you body and soul if I say you fancy that, you would be a fool Pat him, give him something to eat and for the rest, be what you please he will not in the least care but will be your faithful and devoted dog Now, believe me, it is just the same with men exactly the same As Goethe says, man or dog, it is a miserable wretch If you ask why these contemptible fellows are so lucky it is just because in themselves and for themselves and to themselves they are nothing at all The value which they possess is merely comparative They exist only for others They are never more than means They are never an end and object in themselves They are mere bait set to catch others Footnote All this is very euphemistically expressed in the Sophoclean verse I do not admit that this rule is susceptible of any exception that is to say complete exceptions There are, it is true, men, though they are sufficiently rare who enjoy some subjective moments neither are perhaps some who for every hundred subjective moments enjoy a few that are objective but a higher state of perfection scarcely ever occurs but do not take yourself for an exception examine your love, your friendship and consider if your objective judgments are not mostly subjective judgments in disguise consider if you duly recognise the good qualities of a man who is not fond of you then be tolerant, confound it, it is your duty as you are so self-centred recognise your own weakness you know that you cannot like a man who does not show himself friendly to you you know that he cannot do so for any length of time unless he likes you and that he cannot like you unless you show that you are friendly to him then do it your false friendliness will gradually become a true one your own weakness and subjectivity must have some illusion this is really an a priori justification of politeness but I could give a still deeper reason for it consider that chance which, with error its brother and folly its aunt and malice its grandmother rules in this world which every year and every day by blows great and small embitters the life of every son of earth and yours too consider I say that it is to this wicked power that you owe your prosperity and independence for it gave you what it refused to many thousands just to be able to give it to individuals like you remembering all this you will not behave as though you had a right to the possession of its gifts but you will perceive what a capricious mistress it is that gives you her favours and therefore when she takes it into her head to deprive you of some or all of them you will not make a great fuss about her injustice but you will recognise that what chance gave chance has taken away if needs be you will observe that this power is not quite so favourable to you as she seemed to be hitherto why she might have disposed not only of what she gave you but also of your honest and hard earned gains but if chance still remains so favourable to you as to give you more than almost all others whose path in life you may care to examine oh be happy do not struggle for the possession of her presence employ them properly look upon them as property held from a capricious lord use them wisely and well the Aristotelian principle of keeping the mean in all things is ill-suited to the moral law for which it was intended but it may easily be the best general rule of worldly wisdom the best precept for a happy life for life is so full of uncertainty there are on all sides so many discomforts burdens, sufferings, dangers that a safe and happy voyage can be accomplished only by steering carefully through the rocks as a rule, the fear of the ills we know drivers into the contrary ills the pain of solitude for example drives us into society and the first society that comes the discomforts of society drives us into solitude we exchange a forbidding demeanour for incautious confidence and so on it is ever the mark of folly to avoid one vice rushing into its country stultidum vitand vitia incontraria coront or else we think that we shall find satisfaction in something and spend all our efforts on it and thereby we are meant to provide for the satisfaction of a hundred other wishes which make themselves felt at their own time one loss and omission follows another and there is no end to the misery Maiden agon and Nil admirari are therefore excellent rules of worldly wisdom we often find that people of great experience are the most frank and cordial in their intercourse with complete strangers in whom they have no interest whatever the reason of this is that men of experience know that it is almost impossible for people who stand in any sort of mutual relation to be sincere and open with one another but that there is always more or less of a strain between them due to the fact that they are looking after their own interests whether immediate or remote they regret the fact but they know that it is so hence they leave their own people rush into the arms of a complete stranger and in happy confidence open their hearts to him thus it is that monks and the like who have given up the world and are strangers to it are such good people to turn to for advice it is only by practising mutual restraint and self-denial that we can act and talk with other people and therefore if we have to converse at all it can only be with a feeling of resignation for if we seek society it is because we want fresh impressions these come from without and are therefore foreign to ourselves if a man fails to perceive this and when he seeks the society of others is unwilling to practise resignation and absolutely refuses to deny himself nay demands that others who are altogether different from himself shall nevertheless be just what he wants them to be for the moment according to the degree of education which he has reached or according to his intellectual powers or his mood the man I say who does this is in contradiction with himself for while he wants someone who shall be different from himself and wants him just because he is different for the sake of society and fresh influence he nevertheless demands that this other individual shall precisely resemble the imaginary creature who accords with his mood and have no thoughts but those which he has himself women are very liable to subjectivity of this kind but men are not free from it either I observed once to Goethe in complaining of the illusion and vanity of life that when a friend is with us we do not think the same of him as when he is away he replied yes because the absent friend is yourself and he exists only in your head whereas the friend who is present has an individuality of his own and moves according to laws of his own which cannot always be in accordance with those which you form for yourself a good supply of resignation is of the first importance in providing for the journey of life it is a supply which we shall have to extract from disappointed hopes and the sooner we do it the better for the rest of the journey how should a man be content so long as he fails to obtain complete unity in his inmost being for as long as two voices alternately speak to him what is right for one must be wrong for the other thus he is always complaining but has any man ever been completely at one with himself nay is not the very thought a contradiction for that a man shall attain this inner unity is the impossible and inconsistent pretension put forward by almost all philosophers footnote for as a man it is natural to him to be at war with himself as long as he lives while he can be only one thing thoroughly he has all the disposition to be everything else and the inalienable possibility of being it he has made his choice of one thing and the other possibilities are always open to him and are constantly claiming to be realised and he has therefore to be continuously keeping them back and to be overpowering and killing them as long as he wants to be that one thing for example if he wants to think only and not act and do business the disposition to the latter is not there by destroyed all at once but as long as the thinker lives he has every hour to keep on killing the acting and pushing man that is within him always battling with himself as though he were a monster whose head is no sooner struck off than it grows again in the same way if he is resolved to be a saint he must kill himself so far as he is a being that enjoys and is given over to pleasure for such he remains as long as he lives it is not once for all that he must kill himself he must keep doing it all his life if he has resolved upon pleasure whatever be the way in which it is to be obtained his lifelong struggle is with a being that desires to be pure and free and holy for the disposition remains and he has to kill it every hour and so on in everything with infinite modifications it is now one side of him and now the other that conquers he himself is the battlefield if one side of him is continually conquering the other is continually struggling for its life is bound up with his own and as a man he is the possibility of many contradictions how is in a unity even possible under such circumstances he resists neither in the saint nor in the sinner or rather the truth is that no man is holy one or the other for it is men that they have to be that is, luckless beings fighters and gladiators in the arena of life to be sure the best thing he can do is to recognise which part of him smarts the most under defeat and let it always gain the victory this he will always be able to do by the use of his reason which is an ever present fund of ideas let him resolve of his own free will to undergo the pain which the defeat of the other part involves this is character for the battle of life cannot be waged free from all pain it cannot come to an end without bloodshed and in any case a man must suffer pain for he is the conquered as well as the conqueror Hayek est vivendi conditio the clever man when he converses will think less of what he is saying than of the person with whom he is speaking for then he is sure to say nothing which he will afterwards regret he is sure not to lay himself open nor to commit an indiscretion but his conversation will never be particularly interesting an intellectual man readily does the opposite and with him the person with whom he converses is often no more than the mere occasion of a monologue and it often happens that the other then makes up for his subordinate role by lying in wait for the man of intellect and drawing his secrets out of him nothing betrays less knowledge of humanity than to support that if a man has a great many friends it is a proof of merit and intrinsic value as though men gave their friendship according to value and merit as though they were not rather just like dogs which love the person that pats them and gives them bits of meat and never trouble themselves about anything else the man who understands how to pat his fellows best though they be the nastiest brutes that's the man who has many friends it is the converse that is true men of great intellectual worth or still more men of genius can only have very few friends for their clear eye soon discovers all defects and their sense of rectitude is always being outraged afresh by the extent and horror of them it is only extreme necessity that compels such men not to betray their feelings or even to stroke the defects as if they were beautiful additions personal love, for we are not speaking of the reverence which is gained by authority cannot be won by a man of genius unless the gods have endowed him with an indestructible cheerfulness of temper a glance that makes the world look beautiful or unless he has succeeded by degrees in taking men exactly as they are that is to say in making a fool of the fools as is right and proper on the heights we must expect to be solitary our constant discontent is for the most part rooted in the impulse of self-preservation this passes into a kind of selfishness and makes a duty out of the maxim that we should always fix our minds upon what we lack so that we may endeavour to procure it thus it is that we are always intent on finding out what we want and on thinking of it but that maxim allows us to overlook undisturbed the things which we already possess and so as soon as we have obtained anything we give it much less attention than before we seldom think of what we have but always of what we lack this maxim of egoism which has indeed its advantages in procuring the means to the end in view itself concurrently destroys the ultimate end namely contentment like the bear in the fable that throws a stone at the hermit to kill the fly on his nose we ought to wait until need and privation announce themselves instead of looking for them minds that are naturally content do this while hypercondrists do the reverse a man's nature is in harmony with itself when he desires to be nothing but what he is that is to say when he has attained by experience a knowledge of his strength and of his weakness instead of playing with false coin and trying to show a strength which he does not possess it is a harmony which produces an agreeable and rational character and for the simple reason that everything which makes the man and gives him his mental and physical qualities is nothing but the manifestation of his will is in fact what he wills therefore it is the greatest of all inconsistencies to wish to be other than we are people of a strange and curious temperament can be happy only under strange circumstances such as suit their nature in the same way as ordinary circumstances suit the ordinary man and such circumstances can arise only if in some extraordinary way they happen to meet with strange people of a character different indeed but still exactly suited to their own that is why men of rare or strange qualities are seldom happy all this pleasure is derived from the use and consciousness of power and the greatest of pains that a man can feel is to perceive that his powers fail just when he wants to use them therefore it will be advantageous for every man to discover what powers he possesses and what powers he lacks let him then develop the powers in which he is preeminent and make a strong use of them let him pursue the path where they will avail him and even though he has to conquer his inclinations let him avoid the path where such powers are requisite as he possesses only in a low degree in this way he will often have a pleasant consciousness of strength and seldom a painful consciousness of weakness and it will go well with him but if he lets himself be drawn into efforts demanding a kind of strength quite different from that in which he is preeminent he will experience humiliation and this is perhaps the most painful feeling with which a man can be afflicted yet there are two sides to everything the man who has insufficient self-confidence in a sphere where he has little power and is never ready to make a venture will on the one hand not even learn how to use the little power that he has and on the other in a sphere in which he would at least be able to achieve something there will be a complete absence of effort and consequently of pleasure this is always hard to bear for a man can never draw a complete blank in any department of human welfare without feeling some pain as a child one has no conception of the inexorable character of the laws of nature and the stubborn way in which everything persists in remaining what it is the child believes that even lifeless things are disposed to yield to it perhaps because it feels itself one with nature or from the mere acquaintance with the world believes that nature is disposed to be friendly thus it was that when I was a child and had thrown my shoe into a large vessel full of milk I was discovered in treating the shoe to jump out nor is a child on its guard against animals until it learns that they are ill-natured and spiteful but not before we have gained mature experience do we recognise that human character is unalterable that no entreaty or representation or example or benefit will bring a man to give up his ways but that on the contrary every man is compelled to follow his own mode of acting and thinking with the necessity of a law of nature and that however we take him he always remains the same it is only after we have obtained a clear and profound knowledge of this fact that we give up trying to persuade people or to alter them and bring them round to our way of thinking we try to accommodate ourselves to theirs instead so far as they are indispensable to us and to keep away from them so far as we cannot possibly agree Ultimately we come to perceive that even in matters of mere intellect although its laws are the same for all and the subject as opposed to the object of thought does not really enter into individuality there is nevertheless no certainty that the whole truth of any matter can be communicated to anyone or that anyone can be persuaded or to ascent to it because as Bacon says intellectus, humanus, luminus, sicchi, non, est the light of human intellect is coloured by interest and passion it is just because all happiness is of a negative character that when we succeed in being perfectly at our ease we are not properly conscious of it everything seems to pass us softly and gently and hardly to touch us until the moment is over and then it is the positive feeling of something lacking that tells us of the happiness which has vanished it is then that we observe that we have failed to hold it fast and we suffer the pangs of self-reproach as well as of privation every happiness that a man enjoys and almost every friendship that he cherishes rests upon illusion for as a rule with increase of knowledge they are bound to vanish nevertheless, here as everywhere a man should courageously pursue truth and never weary of striving to settle accounts with himself and the world no matter what happens to the right or to the left of him be it a chimera or fancy that makes him happy let him take heart and go on with no fear of the desert which widens to his view of one thing only must he be quite certain that under no circumstances will he discover any lack of worth in himself when the veil is raised the sight of it would be the gorgon that would kill him therefore if he wants to remain undeceived let him in its inmost being feel his own worth for to feel the lack of it is not merely the greatest but also the only true affliction all other sufferings of the mind may not only be healed may be immediately relieved by the secure consciousness of worth the man who is assured of it can sit down quietly under sufferings that would otherwise bring him to despair and though he has no pleasures no joys and no friends he can rest in and on himself so powerful is the comfort to be derived from a vivid consciousness of this advantage a comfort to be preferred to every other earthly blessing contrarily nothing in the world can relieve a man who knows his own worthlessness all that he can do is to conceal it by deceiving people or deafening them with his noise but neither expedient will serve him very long we must always try to preserve large views if we are arrested by details we shall get confused and see things arise the success or the failures of the moment and the impression that they make should count for nothing translator's note Schopenhauer for some reason that is not apparent wrote this remark in French end note how difficult it is to learn to understand oneself and clearly to recognise what it is that one wants before anything else what it is therefore that is most immediately necessary to our happiness then what comes next and what takes the third and the fourth place and so on yet without this knowledge our life is planless like a captain without a compass the sublime melancholy which leads us to cherish a lively conviction of the worthlessness of everything of all pleasures and of all mankind and therefore to long for nothing but to feel that life is merely a burden to an end that cannot be very distant is a much happier state of mind than any condition of desire which, be it never so cheerful would have us place a value on the illusions of the world and strive to attain them this is a fact which we learn from experience and it is clear a priori that one of these is a condition of illusion and the other of knowledge whether it is better to marry is a question which in very many cases amounts to this are the cares of love more enjoyable than the anxieties of a livelihood marriage is a trap which nature sets for us translator's note also in French end note poets and philosophers who are married men incur by that very fact the suspicion that they are looking to their own welfare and interests of science and art habit is everything hence to be calm and unruffled is merely to anticipate a habit and it is a great advantage not to need to form it quote personality is the element of the greatest happiness end quote since pain and boredom are the two chief enemies of human happiness nature has provided our personality with a protection against both we can ward off pain which is more often of the mind than of the body by cheerfulness and boredom by intelligence but neither of these is akin to the other nay in any high degree they are perhaps incompatible as Aristotle remarks genius is allied to melancholy and people of very cheerful disposition are only intelligent on the surface the better therefore anyone is by nature armed against one of these evils the worse as a rule is he armed against the other there is no human life that is free from pain and boredom and it is a special favour on the part of fate if a man is chiefly exposed to the evil against which nature has armed him the better if fate that is sends a great deal of pain where there is a very cheerful temper in which to bear it and much leisure where there is much intelligence but not vice versa for if a man is intelligent he feels pain doubly or trebly and a cheerful but unintellectual temper finds solitude and unoccupied leisure altogether unendurable in the sphere of thought absurdity and perversity remain the masters of this world and their dominion is suspended only for brief periods nor is it otherwise in art for there genuine work seldom found and still more seldom appreciated is again and again driven out by dullness, insipidity and affectation it is just the same in the sphere of action most men says bias are bad virtue is a stranger in this world and boundless egoism, cunning and malice are always the order of the day it is wrong to deceive the young on this point for it will only make them feel later on that their teachers were the first to deceive them if the object is to render the pupil a better man by telling him that others are excellent it fails and it would be more to the purpose to say most men are bad it is for you to be better in this way he would at least be sent out into the world armed with a shrewd foresight instead of having to be convinced by bitter experience that his teachers were wrong all ignorance is there all ignorance is dangerous and most errors must be dearly paid and good luck must he have that carries unchastised an error in his head unto his death translators note this again is in Schopenhauer's own English end note every piece of success has a doubly beneficial effect upon us when apart from the special and material advantage which it brings it is accompanied by the enlivening assurance that the world, fate or the demon within does not mean so badly with us nor is so opposed to our prosperity as we had fancied when in fine it restores our courage to live similarly every misfortune or defeat has in the contrary sense an effect that is doubly depressing if we were not all of us exaggeratedly interested in ourselves life would be so uninteresting that no one could endure it everywhere in the world and under all circumstances it is only by force that anything can be done but power is mostly in bad hands because baseness is everywhere in a fearful majority why should it be folly to be always intent on getting the greatest possible enjoyment out of the moment which is our only sure possession our whole life is no more than a magnified present and in itself as fleeting as a consequence of his individuality and the position in which he is placed everyone without exception lives in a certain state of limitation both as regards his ideas and the opinions which he forms another man is also limited though not in the same way but should he succeed in comprehending the others limitation to confuse and abash him and put him to shame by making him feel what his limitation is even though the other be far and away his superior shrewd people often employ this circumstance to obtain a false and momentary advantage the only genuine superiority is that of the mind and character all other kinds are fictitious affected, false and it is good to make them feel that it is so when they try to show off before the superiority that is true translators note in the original this also is in French end note all the worlds a stage and all the men and women merely players exactly independently of what a man really is in himself he has a part to play imposed upon him by determining his rank education and circumstances the most immediate application of this truth appears to me to be that in life as on the stage we must distinguish between the actor and his part distinguish that is the man in himself from his position and reputation from the part which rank and circumstances have imposed upon him how often it is the worst actor plays the king and the best the beggar this may happen in life too and a man must be very crude to confuse the actor with his part our life is so poor that none of the treasures of the world can make it rich for the sources of enjoyment are soon found to be all very scanty and it is in vain that we look for one that will always flow therefore as regards our own welfare there are only two ways in which we can use wealth we can either spend it in ostentatious pomp and feed on the cheap respect which our imaginary glory will bring us from the infatuated crowd or by avoiding all expenditure that will do us no good we can let our wealth grow so that we may have a bulwark against misfortune and want that shall be stronger and better every day in view of the fact that life has few delights is rich in evils it is just because our real and inmost being is will that it is only by its exercise that we can attain a vivid consciousness of existence although this is almost always attended by pain hence it is that existence is essentially painful and that many persons for whose once full provision is made arrange their day in accordance with extremely regular monotonous and infinite habits by this means they avoid all the pain which the movement of the will produces but on the other hand their whole existence becomes a series of scenes and pictures that mean nothing they are hardly aware that they exist nevertheless it is the best way of settling accounts with life so long as there is sufficient chance to prevent an excessive feeling of boredom it is much better still if the muses give a man something worthy of occupation so that the pictures which fill his consciousness have some meaning and yet not a meaning that can be brought into any relation with his will a man is wise only on condition of living in a world of fools End of section 9 Genius and virtue In the realm of physics it was held for thousands of years to be a fact beyond question that water was a simple and consequently an original element in the same way in the realm of metaphysics it was held for a still longer period that the ego was a simple and consequently an indestructible entity I have shown however that it is composed of two heterogeneous parts namely the will which is metaphysical in its character a thing in itself and the knowing subject which is physical and a mere phenomenon let me illustrate what I mean take any large massive heavy building this hard ponderous body that fills so much space exists I tell you only in the soft pulp of the brain there alone in the human brain has it any being unless you understand this you can go no further in the world itself that is a miracle the world of material bodies I looked at two of them both were heavy, symmetrical and beautiful one was a jasper vase with golden rim and golden handles the other was an organism an animal, a man when I had sufficiently admired their exterior I asked my attendant genius to allow me to examine the inside of them and I did so in the vase I found nothing but the force of gravity and a certain obscure desire which took the form of chemical affinity but when I entered into the other how shall I express my astonishment at what I saw it is more incredible than all the fairy tales and fables that were ever conceived nevertheless I shall try to describe it even at the risk of finding no credence for my tale in this second thing or rather in the upper end of it called the head which on its exterior side looks like anything else a body in space heavy and so on I found no less an object than the whole world itself together with the whole of the space in which all of it exists and the whole of the time in which all of it moves and finally everything that fills both time and space in all its variegated and infinite character nay strangest sight of all I found myself walking about in it it was no picture that I saw in a keep show but reality itself this it is that is really and truly to be found in a thing which is no bigger than a cabbage and which on occasion an executioner might strike off at a blow and suddenly smother that world in darkness and night the world I say would vanish did not heads grow like mushrooms and were there not always plenty of them ready to snatch it up as it is sinking down into nothing and keep it going like a ball this world is an idea which they all have in common and they express the community of their thought by the word objectivity in the face of this vision I felt as if I were Ardshgunar when Krishna appeared to him in his true majesty with his 100,000 arms and eyes and mouths when I see a wide landscape and realise that it arises by the operation of the functions of my brain that it is to say of time space and causality on certain spots which have gathered on my retina I feel that I carry it within me I have an extraordinarily clear consciousness of the identity of my own being with that of the external world nothing provides so vivid an illustration of this identity as a dream for in a dream other people appear to be totally distinct from us and to possess the most perfect objectivity and a nature which is quite different from ours and which often puzzles surprises, astonishes or terrifies us and yet it is all our own self it is even so with the will which sustains the whole of the external world and gives it life it is the same will that is in ourselves and it is there alone that we are immediately conscious of it but it is the intellect in ourselves and in others for it is the intellect which everywhere divides actual being into subject and object it is a hall of phantasmagorical mystery inexpressibly marvellous incomparably magical the difference in degree of mental power which sets so wide a gulf between the genius and the ordinary mortal rests, it is true upon nothing else than a more or less perfect development of the cerebral system but it is this very difference which is so important because the whole of the real world in which we live and move possesses an existence only in relation to this cerebral system accordingly the difference between a genius and an ordinary man is a total diversity of world and existence the difference between man and the lower animals may be similarly explained when momus was said to ask for a window in the breast it was an allegorical joke and we cannot even imagine such a contrivance to be a possibility but it would be quite possible to imagine that the skull and its integuments were transparent and then, good heavens what differences should we see in the size the form, the quality, the movement of the brain what degrees of value a great mind would inspire as much respect at first sight as three stars on a man's breast and what a miserable figure would be cut by many a one who wore them men of genius and intellect and all those whose mental and theoretical qualities are far more developed than their moral and practical qualities men in a word who have more mind than character are often not only awkward and ridiculous in matters of daily life as has been observed by Plato in the seventh book of the republic and portrayed by Goethe in his tasso but they are often, from a moral point of view weak and contemptible creatures as well nay, they might almost be called bad men of this, Russo has given us genuine examples nevertheless, that better consciousness which is the source of all virtue is often stronger in them than in many of those whose actions are nobler than their thoughts nay, it may be said that those who think nobly have a better acquaintance with virtue while the others make a better practice of it full of zeal for the good and for the beautiful they would faint fly up to heaven in a straight line but the grosser elements of this earth oppose their flight and they sink back again they are like born artists who have no knowledge of technique or find that the marble is too hard for their fingers many a man who has much less enthusiasm for the good and a far shallower acquaintance with its depths makes a better thing of it in practice he looks down upon the noble thinkers with contempt and he has a right to do it nevertheless, he does not understand them and they despise him in their turn and not unjustly they are to blame for every living man has by the fact of his living signed the conditions of life but they are still more to be pitied they achieve their redemption not on the way of virtue but on a path of their own and they are saved not by works but by faith men of no genius whatever cannot bear solitude they take no pleasure in the contemplation of nature and the world this arises from the fact that they never lose sight of their own will and therefore they see nothing of the objects of the world but the bearing of such objects upon their will and person with objects which have no such bearing there sounds within them a constant note it is nothing to me which is the fundamental base in all their music thus all things seem to them to wear a bleak gloomy strange hostile aspect it is only for their will that they seem to have any perceptive faculties at all and it is in fact only a moral and not a theoretical tendency only a moral and not an intellectual value that their life possesses the lower animals bend their heads to the ground because all that they want to see is what touches their welfare and they can never come to contemplate things from a really objective point of view it is very seldom that unintellectual men make a true use of their erect position and then it is only when they are moved by some intellectual influence outside them the man of intellect or genius on the other hand has more of the character of the eternal subject that knows than of the finite subject that wills his knowledge is not quite engrossed and captivated by his will but passes beyond it he is the son not of the bond woman but of the free it is not only a moral but also a theoretical tendency that is evidenced in his life nay it might perhaps be said that to a certain extent he is beyond morality of great villainy he is totally incapable and his conscience is less oppressed by ordinary sin than the conscience of the ordinary man the relationship as it were is a game and he sees through it the relation between genius and virtue is determined by the following considerations vice is an impulse of the will so violent in its demands that it affirms its own life by denying the life of others the only kind of knowledge that is useful to the will is the knowledge that a given effect is produced by a certain cause genius itself is a kind of knowledge of ideas and it is a knowledge which is unconcerned with any principle of causation the man who is devoted to knowledge of this character is not employed in the business of the will nay every man who is devoted to the purely objective contemplation of the world and it is this that is meant by the knowledge of ideas completely loses sight of his will and its objects and pays no further regard to the interests of his own person pure intelligence free of any admixture of will where then devotion to the intellect predominates over concern for the will and its objects it shows that the man's will is not the principle element in his being but that in proportion to his intelligence it is weak violent desire which is the root of all vice never allows a man to arrive at the pure and disinterested contemplation of the world free from any relation to the will to constitute the quality of genius but here the intelligence remains the constant slave of the will since genius consists in the perception of ideas and men of genius contemplate their object it may be said that it is only the eye which is any real evidence of genius for the contemplative gaze has something steady and vivid about it and with the eye of genius it is often the case as with Goethe that the white membrane over the pupil is visible with violent passionate men the same thing may also happen but it arises from a different cause and may be easily distinguished by the fact of the eye's role men of no genius at all have no interest in the idea expressed by an object but only in the relations in which that object stands to others and finally to their own person thus it is that they never indulge in contemplation or are soon done with it and rarely fix their eyes long upon an object and so their eyes do not wear the mark of genius which I have described nay the regular Philistine does the direct opposite of contemplating he spies if he looks at anything it is to pry into it as may be specially observed when he screws up his eyes which he frequently does in order to see the clearer certainly no real man of genius ever does this at least habitually is short sighted what I have said will sufficiently illustrate the conflict between genius and vice it may be however nay it is often the case that genius is attended by a strong will and as little as men of genius were ever consummate rascals were they ever perhaps perfect saints either let me explain virtue is not exactly a positive weakness of the will it is rather an intentional restraint imposed upon its violence through a knowledge of it in its inmost being as manifested in the world this knowledge of the world the inmost being of which is communicable only in ideas is common both to the genius and to the saint the distinction between the two is that the genius reveals his knowledge by rendering it in some form of his own choice and the product is art for this the saint as such possesses no direct faculty he makes an immediate application of his knowledge to his own will which is thus led into a denial of the world with the saint knowledge is only a means to an end whereas the genius remains at the stage of knowledge and has his pleasure in it and reveals it by rendering what he knows in his art in the hierarchy of physical organisation strength of will is attended by a corresponding growth in the intelligent faculties a high degree of knowledge such as exists in the genius presupposes a powerful will though at the same time a will that is subordinate to the intellect in other words both the intellect and the will are strong but the intellect is the stronger of the two unless as happens in the case of the saint the intellect is at once applied to the will or as in the case of the artist it finds its pleasure in a reproduction of itself the will remains untamed any strength that it may lose due to the predominance of pure objective intelligence which is concerned with the contemplation of ideas and is not as in the case of the common or the bad man wholly occupied with the objects of the will in the interval when the genius is no longer engaged in the contemplation of ideas and his intelligence is again applied to the will and its objects the will is reawakened in all its strength thus it is that men of genius often have very violent desires and are addicted to sensual pleasure and to anger great crimes however they do not commit because when the opportunity of them offers they recognise their idea and see it very vividly and clearly their intelligence is thus directed to the idea and so gains the predominance over the will and turns its course as with the saint and the crime is uncommitted the genius then always participates to some degree in the characteristics of the saint as he is a man of the same qualification and contrarily the saint always participates to some degree in the characteristics of the genius the good natured character which is common is to be distinguished from the saintly by the fact that it consists in a weakness of will with a somewhat less marked weakness of intellect a lower degree of the knowledge of the world as revealed in ideas here suffices to check and control a will that is weak in itself genius and sanctity are far removed from good nature which is essentially weak in all its manifestations apart from all that I have said so much at least is clear what appears under the forms of time space and causality and vanishes again and in reality is nothing by death this vicious and fatal appearance is the will but what does not appear and is no phenomenon but rather the new monon what makes appearance possible what is not subject to the principle of causation and therefore has no vein or vanishing existence but abides forever unchanged in the midst of a world full of suffering like a ray of light in a storm free therefore from all pain and causality this I say is the intelligence the man who is more intelligence than will is thereby delivered in respect of the greatest part of him from nothingness and death and such a man is in his nature a genius by the very fact that he lives and works the man who is endowed with genius makes an entire sacrifice of himself in the interests of everyone accordingly he is free from the obligation to make a particular sacrifice for individuals and thus he can refuse many demands which others are rightly required to meet he suffers and achieves more than all the others the spring which moves the genius to elaborate his works is not fame for that is too uncertain equality and when it is seen at close quarters of little worth no amount of fame will make up for the labour of attaining it nulla est fama tuam pa equiparare laborum nor is it the delight that a man has in his work for that too is outweid by the effort which he has to make it is rather an instinct sui generis in virtue of which the genius is driven to express what he sees and feels in some permanent shape without being conscious of any further motive it is manifest that in so far as it leads an individual to sacrifice himself for his species and to live more in the species than in himself this impulse is possessed of a certain resemblance with such modifications of the sexual impulse as a peculiar to man the modifications to which I refer are those that can find this impulse to certain individuals of the other sex whereby the interests of the species are attained the individuals who are actively affected by this impulse may be said to sacrifice themselves for the species by their passion for each other and the disadvantaged conditions thereby imposed upon them in a word by the institution of marriage they may be said to be serving the interests of the species rather than the interests of the individual the instinct of the genius does in a higher fashion for the idea what passionate love does for the will in both cases there are peculiar pleasures and peculiar pains reserved for the individuals who in this way serve the interests of their species and they live in a state of enhanced power the genius who decides once and for all to live for the interests of the species in the way which he chooses is neither fitted nor called upon to do it in the other it is a curious fact that the perpetuation of a man's name is affected in both ways in music the finest compositions are the most difficult to understand they are only for the trained intelligence they consist of long movements where it is only after a labyrinthine maze that the fundamental note is recovered it is just so with genius it is only after a course of struggle and doubt and error and much reflection and vacillation that the minds attain their equilibrium it is the longest pendulum that makes the greatest swing little minds soon come to terms with themselves and the world and then fossilise but the others flourish and are always alive and in motion the essence of genius is a measure of intellectual power far beyond that which is required to serve the individual's will but it is a measure of a merely relative character and it may be reached by lowering the degree of the will as well as by raising that of the intellect there are men whose intellect predominates over their will and yet are not possessed of genius in any proper sense their intellectual powers do indeed exceed the ordinary though not to any great extent but their will is weak they have no violent desires and therefore they are more concerned with mere knowledge than with the satisfaction of any aims such men possess talent they are intelligent and at the same time very contented and cheerful a clear, cheerful and reasonable mind such as brings a man happiness is dependent on the relation established between his intellect and his will a relation in which the intellect is predominant but genius and a great mind depend on the relation between a man's intellect and that of other people a relation in which his intellect must exceed theirs and at the same time his will may also be proportionately stronger that is the reason why genius and happiness need not necessarily exist together when the individual is distraught by cares or pleasantry or tortured by the violence of his wishes and desires the genius in him is enchained and cannot move it is only when care and desire are silent that the air is free enough for a genius to live in it it is then that the bonds of matter are cast aside and the pure spirit, the pure knowing spirit remains hence if a man has any genius let him guard himself from pain keep care at a distance and limit his desires but those of them which he cannot suppress let him satisfy to the full this is the only way in which he will make the best use of his rare existence to his own pleasure and the world's profit to fight with need and care or desires the satisfaction of which is refused and forbidden is good enough work for those who were they free of would have to fight with boredom and so take to bad practices but not for the man whose time, if well used will bear fruit for centuries to come as Didaro says he is not merely a moral being mechanical laws do not apply in the sphere of chemistry nor do chemical laws in the sphere in which organic life is kindled in the same way the rules which avail for ordinary men will not do for the exceptions nor will their pleasures either it is a persistence uninterrupted activity that constitutes the superior mind the object to which this activity is directed is a matter of subordinate importance it has no essential bearing on the superiority in question but only on the individual who possesses it all that education can do is to determine the direction which this activity shall take and that is the reason why a man's nature is so much more important than his education for education is to natural faculty what a wax knows is to the real one or what the moon and the planets are to the sun in virtue of his education a man says not what he thinks himself but what others have thought and he has learned as a matter of training and what he does is not what he wants but what he has been accustomed to the lower animals perform many intelligent functions much better than man for instance the finding of their way back to the place from which they came the recognition of individuals and so on in the same way there are many occasions in real life to which the genius is incomparably less equal and fitted than the ordinary man nay more just as animals never commit a folly in the strict sense of the word so the average man is not exposed to folly in the same degree as the genius the average man is wholly relegated to the sphere of being on the other hand, lives and moves chiefly in the sphere of knowledge this gives rise to a twofold distinction in the first place a man can be one thing only but he may know countless things and thereby to some extent identify himself with them by participating in what Spinoza calls their Essie Objectivum in the second place the world as I have elsewhere observed is fine enough in appearance but in reality dreadful for torment is the condition of all life it follows from the first of these distinctions that the life of the average man is essentially one of the greatest boredom and thus we see the rich warring against boredom with as much effort and as little respite has fall to the poor in their struggle with need and adversity and from the second of them it follows that the life of the average man is overspread with a dull turbid uniform gravity whilst the brow of genius glows with mirth of a unique character which although he has sorrows of his own more poignant than those of the average man nevertheless breaks out of fresh like the sun through clouds it is when the genius is overtaken by an affliction which affects others as well as himself that this quality in him is most in evidence for then he is seen to be like man who alone can laugh in comparison with the beast of the field which lives out its life grave and dull it is the curse of the genius that in the same measure in which others think him great and worthy of admiration he thinks them small and miserable creatures his whole life he has to suppress this opinion and as a rule he thinks theirs as well meanwhile he is condemned to live in a bleak world where he meets no equal as it were an island where there are no inhabitants but monkeys and parrots moreover he is always troubled by the illusion that from a distance a monkey looks like a man vulgar people take a huge delight in the faults and follies of great men and great men are equally annoyed and reminded of their kinship with them the real dignity of a man of genius or great intellect the trait which raises him over others and makes him worthy of respect is at bottom the fact that the only unsullied and innocent part of human nature namely the intellect has the upper hand in him and prevails whereas in the other there is nothing but sinful will and just as much intellect is guiding his steps rarely any more very often somewhat less and of what use is it it seems to me that genius might have its root in a certain perfection and vividness of the memory as it stretches back over the events of past life for it is only by dint of memory which makes our life in the strict sense a complete whole that we attain a more profound and comprehensive understanding of it end of the art of controversy


I think it's unbelievable what's happened in here, and you really have to come in and see it. Just driving through on 22, you have no idea what's happening on the other side of the wall. This space is going to revitalize Bedford. This is exactly what we've been needing here for years. This is going to be a game changer. It's now going to turn into a state-of-the-art community space for everyone in this area and surrounding areas.


I'm trying to write a song to welcome people to the thunk community, but I can't really decide how it should go. I mean, should I use that chord? Discord? If you'll indulge a little of my creative process here, I've rewritten this introduction several times, using numerous different examples of a phenomenon that you might be familiar with, something like analysis paralysis, failures that arise due to a desire to find an optimal solution, or a reticence to implement any solution out of fear that it might not be the best way forward. Slow government responses to the threat of COVID-19, stalling on placing an order for groceries because I wasn't sure what kind of bread I should get, vacillating on which to-do app I should use, that sort of stuff. After fleshing out each example, I'd wonder if it was really the best way to approach the topic, whether there might not be a simpler or clearer or more relatable way to get the point across. And here we are. Only took me four hours. The compulsion to optimize is easy to understand, especially for folks who have a particular interest in improving cognition and rationality. Whenever game theorists or psychologists analyze how we make decisions and how we ought to, the gold standard for rational decision-making is that of maximizing expected utility. Making choices in such a way that the decider has the best possible odds of getting the most desirable payoff, whatever that is for them. When we talk about things like cognitive biases or errors in judgment, we're talking about deviating from that theoretical framework. If you're not maximizing utility, you're acting irrationally, and the greater the discrepancy, the greater the error. People who care about making good decisions probably think a lot about how close their choices get to that ideal, especially with the stock market where it is right now. But the real world is very rarely as clear cut as in those experiments. In order to even measure deviation from demonstrably optimal decisions, we had to construct tests that satisfy some truly meticulous conditions, conditions that are hard, if not impossible, to get in everyday life. Like, say you wanted to start your first day as a perfectly rational actor, wholly committed to behaving in a way that will maximize your expected utility. What should you have for breakfast? Well, you'd need a well-defined set of metrics for how to value the overall utility of the various things that you might eat, probably including nutritional content, pleasure of consumption, costs, time for preparation, novelty, maybe the moral aspects of how it's sourced and produced, all sorts of stuff. You'd need an exhaustive list of items that you could potentially eat for breakfast for comparison. You'd need some serious number crunching to evaluate the overall utility of each of those items in the current state of the world. Incidentally, did you know that there's a thunk folding at home team? Needless to say, by the time your breakfast utility calculator spits out an answer, you're probably going to be very, very hungry. That enormous gap between the maximum expected utility definition of rationality and the computational complexity of everyday life might strike you as suspicious. If everyday decisions like what should I have for breakfast are so far outside the realm of what can be reasonably evaluated using our yardstick of maximizing expected utility, maybe all these cognitive biases and predictable errors and cognition aren't really mistakes, but well-adapted tools for a resolution of problem that isn't really being measured in the very specific scenarios engineered in labs. In his essay, The Fiction of Optimization, psychology researcher Gary Klein notes how far the limitations of utility maximizing and removing it from the realm of usefulness, going so far as to suggest that it's actually detrimental to take it too seriously. He says that all the fuss that's made about how we should correct for and eliminate biases in the interest of making people better utility maximizers, it's kind of missing the forest for the trees. If you watch people operating in the world, they actually do remarkably well at making good decisions in rapidly changing circumstances. Klein's original research focused on veteran firefighters, observing that they made many split second choices in life or death scenarios that were incredibly good in almost automatic, without any sort of comparison or weighting of different options, the way that a utility maximizer might, he takes the position that we should understand both our cognitive apparatus and the best ways to use it in terms of bounded rationality, a framework that examines rationality with an eye towards its real world constraints like time, processing power, that sort of thing. The bounded rationality paradigm might just seem like a fluffier version of utility maximization at first glance. Yes, yes, if you don't have the time or the resources to find the right decision, making the most optimized decision you can with what you have is still rational, I guess. But the shift of emphasis to the limitations of decision making has some interesting implications. Rather than viewing cognitive biases as absurd deviations from rationality, Klein suggests that they're better understood as useful heuristics, mental shortcuts and rules of thumb optimized for rapid, good enough choices, where we'd otherwise be totally helpless to find anything close to a decent answer. In that view, trying to eliminate the effects of bias would be like trying to fling your oars overboard because one is slightly bigger than the other, opting to paddle yourself around with your hands. Bounded rationality also frees us somewhat from the behavioral implications of fixating on optimization. If we constantly judge our actions and choices by comparing them to some theoretical world where we have infinite time and processing power to evaluate our options, it seems totally reasonable that we defer decisions as long as possible, gathering data and hemming and hawing until the very last possible moment to be assured that we were not missing anything. Unfortunately, that approach tends to err on the side of inaction. Let's not be hasty is the refrain of those who maintain the status quo up until it's too late for them to change the course of events, at which point the rational option is trivially easy to calculate because it's the only one left. This failure of delaying action in deference to optimal decision making is exacerbated by an observation called Freitkin's Paradox.  You can probably answer that with no hesitation, less than a second of thought. I hope. But let's say that I give you a choice between this slice of cake and that slice of cake. Well, now this is a real conundrum, isn't it? You might ponder that for minutes, maybe ask for more information about the composition and flavor of the cakes, ask the waiter which one he prefers. This leads to a somewhat counterintuitive conclusion. A decision maker who's trying to maximize their expected utility will spend the least amount of time considering decisions that give them the greatest benefit, and the most time considering decisions that really don't make that much difference at all. Show of hands, who's been trapped in a two hour meeting about something that doesn't really matter? Freitkin's Paradox puts a point on the behavioral problems of treating maximum expected utility as the fundamental measure of reason. Not only are we in danger of getting stuck trying to optimize past the point that we really should have been acting, it's likely that the vast majority of that time will be spent on fine tuning inconsequential details rather than substantially improving outcomes. In the context of bounded rationality, where we're trying our damnedest to make the best possible decisions inside strict budgets of time and processing power, it starts to look a little silly to bemoan things like confirmation bias, which seems specifically geared to light a fire and get people to act rather than endlessly debating which slice of cake will really hit the spot. Klein wraps up his essay by offering an archetype of what an optimized bounded rationalist might look like by examining some champions of highly constrained, high accuracy decision making. Speed chess players. There are fair ways from firefighting, but there are some commonalities in a way that experienced chess masters and veteran firefighters go about making moves without resorting to time consuming optimization. Pro chess players don't really stack potential choices up against each other and evaluate the relative pros and cons to fine tune the best possible move. They look for clear openings and threats. They will play out some possible responses to check to see if there's anything disastrous or awesome that might result from a certain line of play. And if they see a strategy that's clearly dominant after a reasonable amount of thought, they pounce on it. There are certainly subconscious processes at work that are trained by experience. Filtering which choices get elevated to conscious consideration, but there's no trace of the stepwise analysis you might expect out of an optimizer. Nobody at that level of play is thinking, well, I get better control of the center, but I'll lose a pawn and that bishop might be annoying. It's just no, no, no, maybe. Yes, your move. Klein notes that this approach really shines when the clock is running out and the pressure amounts. While Deep Blue was clearly a superior optimizer, it didn't really have any capacity for desperation moves. Wild risky half-second maneuvers designed to maybe open up some possibilities where there isn't enough time for a proper plan. The computer would sit there and patiently grind down its remaining time in almost exactly the same fashion as its other moves. While human players might sometimes be able to snatch a stalemate by just trying anything that looks promising and seeing if it sticks. I know, it's a weird message for a channel that's been mostly about thinking more thoroughly about things, but rather than cogitating endlessly to identify increasingly optimal solutions, maybe the best course of decision-making habits are actually those which enable us to identify blazingly obvious advantages and act on them without hesitation. I certainly could have used that advice when I started writing this episode. How about you? Do you think that you're reaping the greatest possible utility within the limits of your apparatus? Please leave a comment below and let me know what you think. Thank you very much for watching. Don't forget to blah, blah, subscribe, blah, share, and don't stop thunking.


Ladies and gentlemen, let's talk about the ultimate dream. Money. Yes, that's right, the green paper that makes the world go round. And what's the easiest way to get more of it? By obtaining a well-paying and highly sought-after job, of course.  Not you, my friend. That's why we're bringing you the top five highest paying Google certificates.  So, put down your student loan calculators, grab a drink, gently tap that like button, and let's learn how you can increase those numbers in your bank account without losing your sanity. Now, with all joking aside, these certificates are a fantastic opportunity, and I've gotten some of the most positive reviews from people who have left comments on the channel. And by the end of this video, you're probably gonna learn why, and you're also gonna have a much better idea of what career path you should go for because these certificates typically will lead you to the high paying in demand careers. So, number five on the list is going to be the Google digital marketing and e-commerce professional certificate. This is going to be the least high paying certificate on the list, and I'll be honest with you, it barely made it on. And the reason for that is because this is a professional certificate that's hosted on Coursera. And those certificates are great, but Google also has their own in-house certificate program, and those certificates might even be better. So, when it comes to getting a job in digital marketing, I actually do think there are better options out there. But with that being said, this certificate is by no means a scam. So, they claim you will be fully ready for an entry level job within six months. And according to Glassdoor, digital marketers make about $68,000 a year. Now, that is typically more of an entry level salary. There's a lot of jobs down the line out there where you can easily make it to six figures.  So, for instance, there is SEO, which is search engine optimization. There is paper click or PPC. There's also email marketing, which is a skill set in and of itself. So, there are a ton of different opportunities to make really good money within digital marketing. And the truth is a great product or service is only half the battle. There are companies out there that probably have the best product or service on the market, but because of the fact they aren't good at marketing, their company ends up dying. And if you don't believe me, just ask the many businesses out there that have failed due to lack of marketing.  So, for instance, I've noticed this is a great career path for people who are creative, but they aren't all that good with technology. And the great thing is you can get an entry level job without having to get a college degree. This is one of those careers where there is just no way the colleges can stay up to date on what's actually working right now, what skill sets are valuable in the market. Usually colleges are teaching stuff that is five to 10 years outdated. And should you continue to pursue a higher rank within the career path, you might end up achieving the rank of chief growth officer. And chief growth officers make $433,000 a year on average according to Glassdoor. And one thing you might wanna notice here, the base pay is $199,000, which is great right off the bat, but the additional pay is $234,000. So this is one of those career paths where if you are a high achiever and you're somebody who's like, hey, I'm gonna double your business or I'm gonna increase business by 20%, you are going to get huge bonuses for doing that. And you have the opportunity to not just make the company more money, but make yourself more money as well. And that's because skills like marketing and sales are directly tied to the company's bottom line. Whereas there's a lot of skill sets out there that are valuable, don't get me wrong, but it's a little bit harder to calculate how much you're making the company. So according to the certificate, here are some of the skills that you'll gain. Oh, and one other thing I wanted to say is there's a couple of great things about these certificates, specifically most of the career paths that these certificates lead to are careers where you can do them remotely. So I know a lot of people do like to work either remote or hybrid jobs, and these are the careers where you're gonna get that opportunity. So for instance, if you'd like to, you can make really good money from an American company while you're traveling around the world to extremely desirable places like the Philippines, Portugal, Costa Rica, or Thailand. Hey guys, in the editing process right now, but quick pause to give you a special deal from Coursera. Coursera is currently offering the Coursera Plus Monthly Promo. This is where learners will get access to over 6,000 courses. And these include the Google Professional Certificates that I've covered in this video, and all of this for just $1 in their first month's subscription. Details are on the screen, you can check it out. Now remember last year they did a promo similar to this, I mentioned it in one of my videos, a bunch of people got into it and they were super happy with it, but a bunch of people missed out on it, and this is going to be for a limited time. So if you're on the fence about it, this is the absolute best time to jump into Coursera Plus. Don't want you to miss out on it, so it's going to be down in the description, as well as the pinned comment below, but anyways, back to the video now. Next on the list is going to be the Google Data Analytics Professional Certificate, and this is actually one of my favorites. So this is currently my number one recommendation for people who are trying to get into data analytics, and before somebody gets triggered and starts typing, yes, I know it's data, not data, it just sounds weird to me, I say data, all right? Get over it. Now, according to Glassdoor, data analysts make about $71,000 a year, and again, this is typically more of an entry-level role, so there's a lot of roles out there you can move into that are going to make much more. And data analysts excel at analyzing data to identify valuable insights, which will help clients in their decision-making processes. So not only do you have to be relatively good at the collection and analyzing of data, but you also need to be able to communicate that data to other people so that they can make actionable changes within their business. Now, after moving on from data analyst, one career path you might go into is a chief data officer, and they make $269,000 a year. Now, here are some of these skills that you will learn from this certificate. Obviously, you're gonna be working with spreadsheets, data cleaning, data analysis, visualization, SQL, et cetera. One thing I really love about the Google professional certificates as well is, hey, maybe the certificate doesn't get you a job on its own, but there's a good chance it'll get you 60 to 80% of the way there, so you're still gonna need to have a good portfolio and you are gonna need to know the skills, so you're gonna have to brush up on other things. But let's say you get like a month or two into this and you realize, hey, data really isn't for you. It's kind of boring, you hate statistics. Well, guess what? You can just move on to a different one of the certificates. And you didn't have to waste a ton of time, effort, or money like you would if you went to college. So this is a fast, cheap, and easy way to figure out what career paths are actually interesting to you. And that sounds like a much better idea than forcing 17 and 18-year-olds to figure out exactly what they're gonna do with their life and making them take out $100,000 in student loans in order to do so. Next one on the list is another really good one, and that is the Google Project Management Professional Certificate. So this is another one that you can complete in about six months, they say, but really all of these can be completed much faster than that. But project managers make about $84,000 a year. And project managers basically keep everyone else in the company happy and they assure that every aspect of the project is executed with high quality and it meets the deadlines. Now as you can imagine, that is kind of more of a high pressure type situation. And the way I think of this career is it's almost like entrepreneurship with training wheels. So it's a really good career to go into if you're somebody who thinks that you might wanna start a business in the future. Now again, this is more of an entry or mid-level role, but in the future you can move on to other positions such as director of project management. They make $164,000 a year. Now some of the skills you can gain from this are going to be organizational culture, career development, strategic thinking, change management, project management, et cetera. So yeah, this is a really good one. I will say I did an entire video on this one so I highly recommend checking those out. In fact, I think I did an entire video on all of them on this list. And one thing I will say about this is you will likely have to get another certificate beyond this one. But that being said, you are gonna learn a lot of valuable things from this certificate. And on top of that, it is going to help you build your portfolio. So again, you can't really expect something that costs I believe it's $39 a month to get you all the way there.  But with that being said, it's gonna get you a significant amount of the way to getting that first entry level job, getting your foot in the door. The next one on the list is going to be the Google IT Automation Professional Certificate. Now this one is IT related information technology, but it is gonna add a little bit of coding in there. And they're gonna teach you in-demand skills such as Python, Git, and IT automation in order to advance your career. So there is a lot of different career paths you could go down with this one. For instance, software developer, it's such a broad term. There's like a hundred different types of software developers, but they make about $95,000 a year according to Glassdoor. And of course, AI has been in the news like 24 seven recently, everyone's freaking out about chat GPT and they think it's gonna be taking their jobs. And then of course others, the smart people, the elons of the world that are not Bobos are figuring out how they can use AI to better their own lives. Now of course this one is again designed just like entry maybe mid-level at most, but down the line you might get a job like principal automation engineer and they make $144,000 a year. Now here are some of the skills that you're gonna gain with this certificate. Using version control, troubleshooting and debugging, Python programming, configuration management, automation, basic Python data structures, et cetera. So yeah, this one can be really good at entry level, but also for somebody who's maybe working in the technology industry in IT and they wanna learn some programming skills. Next one on the list is another great one. It's going to be the Google UX design professional certificate. Now UX stands for user experience and this is another one where they say you're gonna learn in-demand skills that will have you job ready in less than six months. Now this is one where I do like the certificate a lot but with that being said it's a little bit more difficult to get into UX design than some of the others on the list.  So it's a very attractive career path. Now of course there's UX and UI and some of the career paths are gonna be a little bit more art related and some of them are gonna be more just blunt force focusing on data. But with that being said, this would be a good get your foot in the door type of thing no matter which way you wanna go. And according to Glassdoor, UX designers make $97,000 a year. So yeah, this is one of my top recommendations for people who want to get into UX design. I would say it's probably better to dip your toe by getting a certificate like this and figure out if it's something you actually wanna get into rather than going straight into a bootcamp. Although bootcamps for UX design actually have a decent reputation. Now like I said, I made a video for all of these individually and I highly recommend you check out the most popular one which is the Google IT certificate and I'll put that right here.


So it was interesting the league last week actually gave teams a heads-up of the start date of the season for next year October 24 2023 the end date to next season April 14th 2024 but even more interestingly they told teams that you know if it went on in season tournament is approved You all will get 80 games initially for your regular season schedule And then the remaining two games will be scheduled after the eight teams advance to the midseason to the in-season tournament this is a tournament that's going to take place between November and December most likely and The fascinating thing about this is it's going to be counted as regular season games So they're not players aren't going to be playing and teams aren't gonna be playing any additional games It's all going to be a part of the NBA's regular season schedule Which will make interesting, you know for the coordinators not for us But for the coordinators to be able to figure out which games count where but it's really to try to Elevate the stakes of these regular season games


I'm Bill Brough in San Francisco, California, reporting from the 10th annual ASCO-GU meeting. A common drug appears to improve survival in hypertensive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. That's the news from the 10th meeting of GU-ASCO. According to a retrospective study, the use of angiotensin system inhibitors, or Improved the survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma by nine months compared with patients who were not receiving these types of agents. Survival was even higher in patients receiving ASIs, along with treatment targeting their Bejaf pathway. Hypertension is a common condition in the United States, and this is the largest analysis to date evaluating the role of ASIs on outcomes in patients with cancer. For more news, visit our Facebook page at www.kidneycancer.org, reporting from San Francisco. With Keri Konoski, I'm Bill Brough.