Hi there, Joe Hope here, showing you my nuts and bolts setup. I have, most importantly, my computer, it's my laptop, it has a webcam in it, but I prefer to use the webcam on my external monitor because I have one, but I don't need it. The other main thing I need to capture on my writing is this Wacom Cintiq tablet. So you use a pen, you can draw it, and as you can see, it just works as an external monitor. So my laptop uses this as a monitor, and the basic idea of the video capture software I use, which is called Camtasia, is that anything you can see on the screen, you can capture. Okay, so I put my headphones on so that you can hear me more clearly when I'm actually recording off the computer. Right now I'm recording this with an iPhone, by the way, but we'll go off that soon. So this is my external monitor, my Wacom Cintiq, and I've opened up a window in Camtasia, which is my video editing software. It's got a Windows, a Linux, and a Mac version, and so we tend to use a lot around the ANU. None of the choices I've made are necessarily optimal, but they definitely wait for me. Okay, so what we can do here is we can start recording. So I go up here and I hit Start Recording, and I get options. So I can either choose my sound and which sound input I have. I can either have the camera on or off, so I could be pulling from a webcam or not, and I can choose to record the screen or not. I'll take the screen and the sound, and if I hit Record now, then after I count down three, two, one, and now it's recording. And it's recording, and it's hidden my Camtasia window, but I can bring it back here. And so this is the Camtasia window. I'm just recording this entire screen at the moment. So let's switch over from the iPhone to this, and you will see what that's like. And now it's recording, and it's recording, and it's hidden my Camtasia window, but I can bring it back here. And so this is the Camtasia window. I'm just recording this entire screen at the moment. So let's switch over from the iPhone to this, and you will see what that's like. So what we have is we have the ability to record things and pull them in. And the Camtasia is mainly a video running software. So what I did is I used my iPhone, I made a couple of videos and I just spoke to them and that's what you've just watched. So that's this video here and this video here. And I also made a recording with Camtasia, which is this piece here. Now if I want to make another recording with Camtasia, what I'll have to do is I'll have to hit record, which I already have done. That's what's happening now.  And then it will just appear with a new item down in this media spot. So let's do that. I hit stop and now you see I've got this new media spot and I can draw that down into my timeline and it's part of your movie. And all you've got to do then is edit it to make it tighter and better and trim off the edges or whatever else you want to do. Now Camtasia has great tutorials to teach you how to do that and so you can learn all the tips and tricks with Camtasia. What I'm going to do next is I'm going to show you my exact workflow for doing the handwritten stuff. And so you can see sort of where I ended up after a few weeks of learning.


Hi and how are you all today? I'm Priyanka. The question says, if the different permutation of all letters of the word examination are listed as in a dictionary, how many words are there in this list before the first word starting with E? Let's just start with our solution. Now here, the given word is examination. Right? Now, if the permutation of the letters of this word is listed in dictionary, words before the first word starting with E are all the words starting with letter A, isn't it? So, we fix A as the first letter of the word. Remaining 10 letters T-I-O-N can have certain numbers of permutation. Now, using theorem 4 of permutation, there will be as many words found in letter examination as the number of permutation of 10 letters. Now, here 2 I's are there and 2 N are there. West all are different. So, the number of permutation that is required, number of permutation divided by 2 factorial divided by 2 factorial again. Let us simplify it. Further, we have 10 multiplied by 9 multiplied by 8 by 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 factorial divided by 2 factorial can be written as 2 multiplied by 1. Again, 2 factorial, 2 factorial will get cancelled out, 2 will get cancelled out and the result of this whole will be a left with 10 multiplied by 9 multiplied by 8 multiplied by 7, 6, 5, 2 and 3. That is equal to 9, 0, 7, 2 double 0. This is our required answer. I hope you enjoyed. Take care.


Aloha, I'm your host, Marcia Joyner, that's who I am, and we are navigating the journey. Navigating the journey is dedicated to exploring the options and choices for end of life care and to assist people to talk about their wishes. It's time to transform our culture so that we shift from not talking about dying to talking about it. It's time to share the way we want to live at the end of our lives. And it's time to communicate about the kind of care we want and don't want for ourselves. We believe that the place for this to begin is not in the intensive care unit. Together we explore the various paths to life's endings. Together we can make these difficult conversations easier, together we can make sure our own wishes and those of our loved ones are expressed and respected. So if you're ready to join us, we ask, navigate the journey. As you know, we are supporting legislation to have medical aid in dying made legal in Hawaii. Therefore we have invited Doug Chen, the state's attorney, to talk about the legal issues with the bill. Most of our audience knows Doug as the state's attorney general who pursued legal action regarding President Trump's new travel ban. So he's our new hero. And welcome, Doug. Thank you for having me on the show, appreciate it. I absolutely love Doug when the new mayor, Peter Karla, became mayor and Doug was his managing director. And I was working at the city council. And so as protocol that we said, I said to Doug, I will come over to meet you. And he says, no, no, no, no, I will come to you. And he did. He came to all of the people in the city council, introduced himself, that he was the new managing director. And for anybody that doesn't know, the city has three branches of government like everything. The mayor's office, the city council and the court council, equal branches. And until Doug came along, they weren't equal. But once he came along, the working relationship seemed more better equal. Great. I'm glad you felt that way. I wanted to do my best. Yes. Thank you. So today we are going to talk about this bill, medical aid and dying. And I'm not going to ask you to take a position, which I understand that because of your position as the state's attorney general, you cannot. But you can talk to us about what is in the bill, what are the processes that we go through with the bill, and what do we look for, what do you look for in the bill? Sure. Okay. Sure. Yeah. Thank you for the opportunity to talk about this. And I think essentially what I would say is what physicians and medical care providers were looking for was some sort of legal authority or legal ability if they chose to help someone with the dying process. I'm probably not going to use the right terminology when I talk about it. That's all right. There are different ways to refer to it. But with the aid and dying process, I think medical care providers, whether they were doctors or nurses or people who were involved in the process, they did not want to be held criminally or civilly liable for their actions. And so as it turns out, for as long as Hawaii has had a penal code, which is part of, and I've got to say that dates back to the model penal code, there is a provision under the manslaughter statute, which says that just in a regular circumstance, if somebody intentionally assists somebody in causing them to commit suicide, that's considered manslaughter. Now, I realize that's not what these people are thinking about or trying to accomplish, but that's just the traditional language that's already been there. So what I see is that this is an effort to give medical care providers the protection and the comfort level that they need in order to be able to do this. Which then in turn helps the patients if they want something like this, then they're able to seek out this kind of assistance without having to do it illegally or in a way that's unsafe. So there's so many things that, first of all, let's go back to sedation, terminal sedation. Now, that's legal. Terminal sedation is when the doctor prescribes morphine or whatever. I don't know all the drugs, so if I get that wrong, I don't know. And I'm not a doctor, but I understand what you mean, meaning that there's a way that they can sedate them until they're gone. That's legal. So how is it that this is the same thing and it's not legal? Right. And I think there is a fine line that's there, but I think doctors take the, again, I'm not a doctor, but I've heard them talk about their, share their testimony and just what's important to them. And really, part of the mission of people who are medical care providers, and let's just say doctors, is that they're always going to want to be able to save lives and protect lives. And so here you have a situation where somebody is seeking to end their life and they're seeking to do it in a way that's humane and that allows them to pass on with dignity. But I think for certain doctors, they will draw a line between sedation and then actually prescribing or assisting somebody in causing their death. So it's a subtle difference, but it's there. Yep. So if you take a note that you will do no harm, letting a person suffer when you can do something that's humane, is that, I mean, to me, that's a real fine line. Right. Oh, and I think that's definitely what I've heard from the advocate. I mean, let me just start off by saying this. I think through this whole, particularly this legislative season, it's been so, you know, fascinating and moving just to hear people on both sides of the issue talk about this. But I think that's definitely something that people who are advocating for this bill to pass are saying, which is that there's so much suffering that involves and so much loss of dignity that occurs because they're just being kept alive without any sort of pleasures or just the ability to just enjoy their life anymore, that they want to be able to make that choice for themselves. Well, yes. And I think that's where we're coming from, is that we, the Bible says we have a free will and we can make choices. Our Constitution says we have the right to make choices. We have the right to privacy and that we can do these things. And yet there's this whole thing that says, no, you can't do that. Right. You know, I got to say, even when I was in law school, it was 22 years ago, but when I was in law school, I remember that this was, and I think this was back in the time of Karen Ann Quinlan. I mean, because I was back in the 70s, but I was around in law school by the time that case had gone through. And so this has been an issue for a generation. I mean, I think people have really talked about this. I've never seen it develop within the Hawaii State Legislature as much as it has to even get to this point. But I think people have always wanted to understand, you know, how do we draw that line? And I think this is such a fascinating issue. Well, now, John Ratcliffe, which all of our audience knows because we've talked to John for any number of times, he filed suit against you. Yeah, he should have. But I love him anyway. Exactly. It's just a legal battle. It's just the way the litigation works. Yeah. Okay. So what about the lawsuit? Sure. Okay. So that's, thank you. That's a good question. So what they're focusing on is just the ability, what happened was I had written an opinion and also my predecessor had written an opinion saying that there's nothing in our current law. So right now we've got legislation, but right now we've got a current existing law. Nothing in our current law that would stop a prosecutor, whether it was me or whether it was another county prosecutor or someone who came after me from prosecuting somebody for manslaughter. Now I'm not saying that we would, but I'm saying that that possibility is out there. So I can understand why, with that possibility out there, it's very difficult for medical care providers, let's say doctors, to be able to agree then because they don't know what's going to happen to them if they were to help assist somebody in the dying process. So anyway, what they're seeking in the lawsuit is they want a court to say, no, you cannot, you prosecutors wouldn't be able to take that kind of action. They're seeking some sort of declaratory relief. That's the legal charge for it. To protect the doctor. Correct. It's okay. And in doing so, it then allows Mr. Radcliffe, who's a wonderful man, to be able to get the assistance that he needs and know that they can do it with the comfort that they're going to be not held criminally or civilly liable. Okay, so now it looks like, of course, that the legislation is moving faster than the lawsuit. Right. Which kind of makes sense. In other words, I mean, so I'll tell you my position, which is that I actually think this is this, rather than having the courts just come out with some sort of ruling, I think it's really better to have the policy people, the people's representatives, you know, make that decision, you know. But that's just me. So I think they're pursuing it on two paths and you're correct. The legislation is moving faster than that. So even if you moved you, the court, would that just protect this one case or would it be for future cases? That's a good question. It would just be for this case, but I'm sure that people would then use this case as, you know, let's assume Mr. Radcliffe were to prevail, then it would be just for Mr. Radcliffe, but that kind of declaratory action would be a precedent for future cases. We have to go to a break and when we come back I want to ask you a lot of questions about what happens, should the bill pass? What happens next? Okay. Okay. Great. Thank you. Hi. I'm Stephen Phillip Katz. I'm a licensed marriage and family therapist in Hawaii and I do a show called Shrink Rap Hawaii where shrinks and sometimes other people come on and talk about the art and science of psychology, talking to people, relationships. So if you are curious about shrinks and want to be shrunk and don't know where to go, tune in to Shrink Rap Hawaii. All right? All right. Thanks for watching Think Tech Hawaii and look forward to seeing you at Education Matters on Tuesday with me, Carol Mon Lee. You're watching Think Tech Hawaii, Hawaii's leading digital media platform for civic engagement, raising public awareness on tech, energy, diversification and globalism. Great content for Hawaii from Think Tech. Aloha. This is Kaili Akeena with the weekly Ehana Kako. Let's work together, program on the Think Tech Hawaii broadcast network Mondays at 2 o'clock PM, movers and shakers and great ideas. Join us. We'll see you then. Aloha. Hi. We're back. And today we are visiting with Hawaii State's Attorney General. What a title. Yeah, I know. That would be great. And we're talking about the medical aid in dying bill. So as the Attorney General, what is it in the bill that you are looking for? Okay. You know what, I would say from a law enforcement perspective, I'm looking for clarity. In other words, what we really want to do is if the policy makers are going to, meaning the legislators and the governor say, we're going to let this bill go through, then as a law enforcement person, what I want to do is I would want to make sure that the good actors are protected and that bad actors are prosecuted. And I think that that would be what I'm looking for is a clarity within the law that makes sure we're separating out the good actors and the bad actors. Good actors being, those are the people who are not taking advantage of the situation or anything like that. They genuinely believe in what this policy is all about. Bad actors would be the people who perhaps take advantage of somebody and it leads to the death of someone because of that. That would actually not be good at all. And so I think we would want to make sure that we have the ability to prosecute those people. And Bill, it talks about coercion. Sure does. Yes. So who at us at work? What is coercion? Right. Well, what you wouldn't want is you wouldn't, and I realize that this is kind of a nightmare, worst case scenario, but what you wouldn't want is somebody who is coerced or pressured into saying, I think all, my relatives don't really want me. I don't want to be around. I'm discouraged and depressed because I'm causing such a burden to everybody, so maybe I should just end my life and I'll find a doctor to be able to do that for me. And so what you wouldn't want is some, what the law relies upon is the judgment of medical care providers to be able to talk to these patients and make sure that their decision is voluntary, that it's based upon a terminal illness, that there are certain protections in place. So we all have to rely upon those medical care providers to make the right judgment. And so what I, and I can trust that there are great medical care providers that could do that. I think the big thing is just to make sure that they're not, you know, the bad actors who would then sanction something like this, even though it's not really what the patient voluntarily wants. Well, you know, quote, bad actors, if they really want to do something, they'll find a way to do it. They do it all the time. For instance, with hospice, if they are with the patient, the bad actors, and there's no nurses, nobody around, and they give them something and the person dies, hospice has the final say, they sign the death certificate, there are no autopsies, nobody knows. So if a bad actor really wants to do something, there's an opportunity, they will find a way. Right. Right. You're right. So you're correct that the law will never be able to, you know, there's always going to be bad actors out there. Yes. So you're right. So I think the thing that I would be looking for is just to make sure that if those bad actors ever were to do something, then we would have the ability to prosecute them and they wouldn't just be able to say, oh, well I'm protected though because of this, because of these laws. So I do see the legislators working very hard, because we're on second draft, third draft of this, and I can see that they are really doing, I mean, really putting in a great effort trying to work with the language just to try to get it right, and I applaud them for doing so.  Let's talk about the safeguards now. Sure. To protect not only the patient, but everybody else involved. Yes. Yeah. What are you, you're looking at safeguards. What do you look for? Right. Well, you know, I think the, I see two things. I think for the patient, it's got to be that they have a terminal illness and that they are, they're making a voluntary, you know, clear-minded, you know, walking into it with eyes open decision. Yeah, I think that that's what, I'm kind of using lay terms to talk about Yeah, that's fine. Which is good.  So that's the protection for them. You want to make sure that that's going on.  And then also that they, you know, they end up having to vouch for the fact that this person is making a voluntary decision. So that's, and that's a very, you know, that's an important role that they need to play. And it's why we, you know, appreciate people who go into the healthcare profession, because I'm sure it's something that they have to live with and work with all the time. Yep. When we look at these, quote, safeguards, we assume, and I have to assume that the primary care person has been with this patient through the process of the treatments, the ailment as it has progressed. So we have to assume that they really are in touch. Yes. That, I mean, at least my relationship with John Radcliffe, he's had the same doctor for 15 years, you know. So this doctor knows where he is emotionally, physically, the whole thing, so he can make this judgment. Now let's talk, and I assume everybody has that. You know, and I would say that I think if the law were to pass, that would be the best case scenario, right? That would be something where at least we could have some level of comfort. Yes. That there's been a long-time relationship. This person really knows what they're talking about. They really understand the patient's needs and concerns, you know. And so the other extreme would be something where you feel like someone just came in at the last minute and just, you know, signed it. But if you have a terminal illness, nobody shows up at the last minute. Sure. I've been down this road for a while. Right. Yeah, terminal illnesses don't just show up. Right. I mean, if you have pneumonia, two days later, you know, anything like that. Let's, and let's talk about this as a, not only the physician, but the advanced practical, advanced practice, RRNs, registered nurses. Okay, okay, sure. Right. Right. In Hawaii. Yes. That had passed across the country, say, two physicians. But in Hawaii, because of our geography, you can't always come up with two physicians. Right. And a lot of cases in rural Hawaii, the nurses, advanced practice, registered nurses, are the primary care. So we propose that amendment, and I think it's in this last draft. But I want to talk about that. So people understand this isn't just an RRN. This is a real practice. An advanced practice, RRN. Yes. And in rural Hawaii, so many of them have their own practice. Right. Okay. Yeah. Yeah, thank you for bringing that up, because I think that's from a legal standpoint, that is something that's more unique about this current Hawaii law, its current draft. So a lot of the draft is based on model language from some of the few other states that have passed this law on the West Coast. That's great. Where Hawaii is a little different, and it's because of the rural concern that you brought up, is they've also added in the ability for advanced practice registered nurses to be able to make certain decisions. What I see in the most recent draft is that what they've done is you have an attending person that decides, and you have a consulting person that decides, two different people that make the decision to sign off on the ultimate decision. And so what they've done is they've allowed the advanced practice registered nurse to still be able to make that decision for one of them. I think the attending. I think on the attending part, the advanced practice registered nurse can do that, but not on the consulting portion. So what I see there is that the legislators are trying to balance out the rural concern along with the concern that maybe advanced practice registered nurses shouldn't be the only ones that are making this decision. Well, but if you live in Molokai, Lanai, Captain Cook, where are you going to find an extra doctor? Right. I hear you. And that's where I think that there's an effort to try to accommodate that kind of situation. So that's all I'm saying is that I think you're pointing out an interesting part of our current bill that is unique and we'll see how our decision makers decide to play that out. Okay. Now, let's assume that it passes the governor signs it because he said he would. What he did? Okay. So what happens, it goes to you and you look at the legalese to make sure it's right. Now what happens then? How do we put this into practice? What goes next? Right. You know, I think there's a rules component that is part of this legislation which would have to occur. So in other words, once the bill, if the bill passes and it's signed into law, then part of this bill includes a portion for the Department of Health to come up with a little bit more of a framework to be able to make all this happen. What's the form going to look like? What's the process going to look like? But that would be part of the government's responsibility to be able to put this law into implementation. So that goes to the Department of Health. And do you have anything, any input before it goes there? Yeah. I mean, we'll be tracking it all the way. In other words, we're tracking it right now, trying to help out legislators with their questions as they're trying to work with the drafts. And then we'll be available for the governor if he has any questions about the bill legally, if he has to make a decision. And then ultimately, we'll be there to help out the Department of Health. We're the state's lawyers, so that's what we do. Well, great. Well, it's been a real pleasure being with you as always. Marcia, you're awesome. It's always been a pleasure. And we will see you again before this is over. I'm sure. Okay. Keep me accountable on this. So that's great. I love it. Yeah. Thank you so much for coming. Great. And we will see you again soon. Great. Thank you, Marcia. Thank you.


I'm sure that everybody has heard these kinds of things. Shape shirts. Shape shirts are people that do. Which in our industry we mean, which are being defunded, which tend to happen to cutting edge technologies, especially trans-tree for 12 years, which is past, which is really scary. This is twice the attrition rate of men who've never seen somebody, I've never heard somebody say a racial slur in our community world, which I think is the exact same life. Like what it's just saying, I'm sorry. Simple as that. So if I stand up and say, I start doing outreach, reach out to LGBTQ resource centers, a lot of community organizers to


Yeah, so what I'd like to do now is concretize the general principles ideas and institutions that you've both now so eloquently talked about and for the sake of our students, I'd like you both to identify some of the the pinnacles the high points of Western civilization Particularly in the in the humanities and in the arts, so I'd like now to ask each of you to identify one work of philosophy literature music painting and architecture that you think symbolizes the hot the best the high points of Western civilization so Well philosophically you one has to I think has to start with Aristotle and and then the Enlightenment the Enlightenment thinkers whether it be John Locke or even some of the French encyclopedias of the 18th century I think that that they are the ones that really Created the modern world from an ideological perspective And I would add I ran to that list of Philosophers because I think she is crucial to the preservation of those ideas in the modern era But they are the ones that created Western civilization from a philosophical perspective You know starting with the cards and and and on into the Enlightenment What was it philosophy? Philosophy literature so literature. I think literature peaks in in the in the 19th century I would say I mean my favorite and I think who represents Represents much of the spirit of Western civilization would be Hugo in in in in France Victor Hugo a book like Lemons and Robles on 93 with big clashes of values and big emotions and and fighting for values you believe in and and You know and recognizing the importance of individuals and the importance of individual values and being willing to fight for those Individual values. I think I think is crucial in sculpture. I would say you know to me nothing beats Michelangelo's David it predates in a sense the philosophical understanding of what the Enlightenment or what Western civilization? constitutes but it represents that courageous individual it represents facing reality boldly with courage as An individual standing up to to Giants right standing up to Goliath while it's a biblical story There's nothing in the sculpture itself that is of faith or religion. It is a few Purely, you know secular peace both materially and spiritually and I think it where it kind of foreshadows it foreshadows the spirit of the founding fathers in establishing this country it foreshadows that idea of Pursuit of happiness a pursuit of values of freedom All in that all in that sculpture architecture You know, I would say that would be later in the in I would say it would be somebody like Frank Lloyd Wright Who is breaking them old doing something new? Presenting an architecture for a modern world for a world engage very individualistic Homes that are different homes that are designed for a client in a particular place Taking into account the environment very much taking into account the personal personal values personal and the freedom to be able to Create something new and to break them old from the past and yet something that's very functional and it has a beautiful Aesthetic so the combination of Functionality and aesthetic value comes together. I think in Frank Lloyd Wright. So I think all of those are representative of a You know of many many many painters and sculptures and playwrights and novelists who represent what Western civilization? What these ideas have managed to produce? Yeah for a lot sorry great conversation. I like it's like a parlor game this The high points of rest and civilization go anyway. Go on philosophy literature music painting and architecture play to I Think that that's about it Philosophy I mean it's it's extraordinary literature The works of Shakespeare Some genius Miracle of those plays and I would couple them and you'll notice that almost all my responses are earlier a Lot earlier I will couple that with the essays of Michel de Montaigne Which you may not have heard of but which you can get anywhere they are extraordinary Funny erudite Individualistic philosophical they range from from all sorts of topics from big ones to tiny ones and in Montaigne and Shakespeare The thing that you notice is and you see this particularly in Shakespeare Even the little minor figures They're fully realized characters What you see in the West is the value and increasing value of the individual character their personality What makes them different not whether they're virtuous or not? Not whether they fit into some mold or other but just because they're themselves as value in themselves even when you laugh at them even when you're Despise them. There's an individuality here and that really that's that's rare in the world.  It's an astonishingly beautiful thing to experience viscerally personally Painting I think I would Split between all of Rembrandt's self-portraits, which are Again incredibly moving and also a function of this this growing sense of a Western understanding of individuality and through time and then I would also place Picasso's Guernica Which was the moment in the 20th century really when During the Spanish Civil War in particular where the sheer horror Warfare Which has defined human societies from the get-go. There was a moment in the West in which This was decided that this was too awful to contemplate anymore, and we have to find a different way of coexisting Was there one more music music? Oh? Allegro is misery. Yeah It's I once I was lucky enough to It's it's it's done in it's Ash Wednesday that it started for it's a Lenten And it's a it's an astonishing thing because it's it's it's one of the few Coral it's all coral. There's no instruments just voices and It's set in four different parts of whichever chapel it's being played in and I remember when I first went to one I've never heard it before and there's a moment in which the treble which is the boys Hits a note that you just did not believe existed on earth Yeah, and The the overwhelming sense of some exquisite exquisite transcendence overwhelms you and I would say that and really um, I mean Anything by Mozart Pretty much, but but for me if I that allegorism is a rarity Is is is a mo is and again, that's a long time ago Yeah, do you know how we have that piece of music in the Western world today? I I know there's a story to it But tell me remind me the story involves the young Mozart so Mozart was in Rome with his father and The Mizorari was only allowed by the Pope to be played in the Vatican and Mozart was there as a very young boy. He was 14 or 15 years old, I believe and he heard it and went back to his apartment and wrote it out by memory and That's how we have a piece of music in the Western world today Was regarded as so So extraordinary that it could only be restricted to the special place precisely And that that tells you something about even then that they understood quite how Specifically beautiful that was yeah Yes, again, I'll be later and more secular In my preferences so in music I would definitely say the peak is the peak of the romantic era with Brahms and Chopin and oh and and yeah, I figured Bob Chopin check off ski anything from Beethoven from Beethoven to the early 20th century to me That is the peak achievement in terms of music and I encourage everybody to try it out Even though it's not not a sexy today. I guess So I'm starting now to detect some differences. Yeah What we need today, but I called a new intellectual would be any man or woman who is willing to think Meaning any man or woman who knows that men's life must be guided by reason by the intellect Not by feelings wishes women's or mystic revelations Any man or woman who values his life and who does not get want to give in to today's of the spare cynicism and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist Using the super chat and I noticed yesterday when I appealed for support for the show many of you step forward and actually Supported the show for the first time so I'll do it again Maybe we'll get some more today If you like what you're hearing if you appreciate what I'm doing then I appreciate your support Those of you who don't yet support the show, please take this opportunity. Go to your own book show calm slash support or go to subscribe star calm your own book show and And and make a kind of a monthly contribution to keep this to keep this going. I'm not sure when the next


If there is any information you have about Tocher Carlson, if he is basically the father, he is a white conservative commentator from his position on and off air, one can easily conclude a bit with some reservations that he is a Christian. His passion for the preservation of what he perceives as true American or Western values led him to make controversial comments about Islam during his time on Fox News. One notable aspect of his style was his reputed attempt at bait futile to link Sharia law with intolerance and Islam with the rise of extremism. However, there are many people like him who oppose Islam but absolutely need it. His strong passion for his religion and country make him inclined towards rejecting Islam. But before we dive into this discussion properly and the invitation, I would provide you with a background of what he said and done to argue against Islam as a response to the decline of Western religious theology. As-salamu alaykum brothers and sisters, I appreciate your presence today on the show. Please like and share to get into Takis inbox. Don't forget to subscribe to help us grow bigger and better. In this episode, Tocher Carlson went full trot to against Muslims who in a poll accepted in the affirmative that it was proper for civilians to be dealt with in the course of implementing the Sharia law. So his grouse was if Islam in the generous sense is intolerant, watch his argument carefully. There are a lot of well-educated affluent Muslims in this area around D.C. But I've seen a bunch of polls like this that show that the attitudes of faithful Muslims are not Western at all and that they include a tolerance of violence you don't find among, say, Presbyterians or Jews. So that's not good. You know, I have not seen that specific poll myself, so I can't say for sure. But you know, all I can say is from my personal experience and that would be absolutely impossible to believe based on what I've seen. So a lot of Americans are concerned about Sharia law. Sure. And they're concerned about polls that show a striking large number of Muslims would like to see it supplant civil law in the countries in which they live. Great Britain, for instance, a huge percentage would like to see it become the law of Great Britain. And in the United States, pretty large number say the same. But in England, it's four out of ten British Muslims. In France, 29% of French Muslims would like to see it replace French law. Why shouldn't that make Americans nervous as more Muslims move here? I found it intriguing that he extended first an invitation to Muslim comfort or rivet who revealed they had embraced Islam more than 30 years ago.  I guess so. It was particularly interesting to hear about his travels to countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, where he witnessed the implementation of Sharia law alongside the flourishing of the right of freedom of religion. Equally captivating was a rivet interpretation of Muslims desire for Sharia law in Western countries, particularly in Britain. What Muslims truly seek is the freedom to embrace their identity without facing the Islamophobia that is very simple or being subjected to police profiling. Such an environment of acceptance and inclusivity would provide Muslims with a sense of security which in turn would significantly contribute to effort against radicalization. I presume that the absence of this sense of security can to some extent, yes to some extent be attributed to the ability of terrorists to recruit individuals who feel marginalized and mistreated by their fellow citizens. If those figures are accurate there, they're certainly not accurate here. I have not met any one person ever who would ever say that they want to supplant US law. The majority of people who came here to the United States came here because they want to live in America. They want to live under the US Constitution. They want freedom of religion. They want freedom of politics. They want the freedoms that every American wants. Sharia law for them is simply religious practice. Now, if you wanted to say that Muslims could not practice their religion here, for example, if they said, well, everyone, this is a Christian country, everyone has to pray on Sunday. All church services have to be on Sundays only. People would object to that. Muslims want to be able to practice their religion the way that it's being taught. But in countries with high percentages of Muslims, I think every country with a high percentage of Muslims, there's not religious pluralism actually. I don't know of a single Gulf country where it's illegal to proselytize on behalf of another religion. I think that in every Muslim majority, country in the world, non-Muslims are treated, have fewer rights. Absolutely. Tucker raised a good point, but it does show that he lacks a basic understanding of the relation between tradition and culture in Islam. The rivet offered a very clear answer. Not true. I mean, there are many countries, Malaysia, for example, Indonesia. Many countries that are Muslim majority enshrine the rights of other non-Muslim faiths. Now, in Malaysia, there are people, you will find people who will say, oh, no, no, no, you have to follow certain of the things that are more appropriate to Islam. But the majority of people there are not like that. You're always going to find some crazy people who want to. But wait a second. I mean, every Arab country, every single one has separate rights for Muslims and non-Muslims in every single Christian majority country I'm aware of, religious pluralism is the law. So there's a massive difference in outlook. A lot of Muslims seem to see Islam not just as a religion, but as a political system. I mean, that seems real to me. Why didn't I that? Well, you know, you're talking about religious versus cultural attitudes. And a lot of those countries, they are cultural attitudes. If you read the Quran, the Quran specifically says that you must tolerate. There is no compulsion in religion. The second chapter of the Quran specifically says that and specifically enshrines the rights of other people for their religious practice, especially people of the book. With these in mind, they are talk of course, and I hope this letter found you well. I recently came across a video where you discuss various religion and cultural topics, which of course, I have done now. And it got me thinking about the potential for you to explore Islam as a path worth considering. Your patriotism and passion for preserving Western values struck me as qualities that could be channeled into propagating Islam in a meaningful way. Islam, with its emphasis on peace, justice and society too, how many aligns with many of the principles you hold there. In light of your intellectual capacity, I would like to offer you copies of the Quran and hadith fundamental texts of Islam for personal study and reflection. These texts will provide you with an in-depth understanding of the teachings and principles of the faith. I also encourage you to embark on a journey of exploration by visiting Islamic countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Bahrain and other areas to witness first-hand people's diverse faith and peaceful coexistence and respect for another's beliefs. This first-hand experience can be truly enlightening and would broaden your perspective. Furthermore, I invite you to visit nearby mosques in America where you can engage with Muslim community, ask questions and learn more about the faith. Mosques often serve as a centre of knowledge and community and your presence would be seriously appreciated. Please also watch this video during your free time. Assalamu alaikum and peace be upon you. My brothers and sisters who are considering reverting to Islam or taking what is known as the Shahada which is the declaration of faith that I bear witness there is none worthy of worship besides Allah and I bear witness that Muhammad peace be upon him is the messenger of Allah in a nutshell that declaration is made by tongue it is believed and it is believed in the heart and we act upon it that makes you a Muslim. And together with this are the pillars of Islam I'm sure by now you would have known exactly what they are and the pillars of Iman which is belief. So we believe in Allah in the angels in the prophets in the books in good and bad faith that comes from the Almighty in the last day and the day of reckoning and judgment and those are the pillars of faith and then the pillars of Islam we utter the Shahada we actually pray five times a day we give arms and charities to the poor we actually fast during the month of Ramadan and whoever is able and capable to make the Hajj or to go for the pilgrimage should go. So once that happens and you believe that you know you're a Muslim sometimes you need a little bit of a nudge in order to make that decision many people are Muslims already before they actually declare the Shahada to others because they've declared it within themselves they've said it they've learned especially during this age of social media. Now what I want to say is if your family is going to be with you in your decision and they support you that would be the best thing many times it's good to contact your family members I mean if someone came to me and asked me to revert I'd like to see their family members participate in this huge turning point in their lives which is definitely going to be positive inshallah especially when we're nurtured in the right way and in the right hands then it's always positive but if we fall into wrong hands very rarely but it does happen then we tend to become people who just do takfir on others and that's why when a person reverts to Islam you have to be careful who you actually associate with because if people are making you think that you have to hate everybody and anybody they're wrong they're actually wrong there are different types of love there's a certain type of love that is for family members that's fine and if they're Muslim it's a different type of a love and for your brothers and sisters of the ummah it's a different type of a love for the mother it's a different type of a love for your husband it's a different type of a love and so on for your enemies there is a type of dislike and you need to know that you must not have an unlimited disliking because it becomes a hate that then becomes unlimited you end up not wanting goodness for them but rather harm and only harm whereas as Muslims even those you dislike you need to want to benefit them by bringing them closer may Allah make it easy for us let's live with the latest gentlemen please share widely until next time assalamu alaikum


And so that brings us to the end of our an introduction. And I want to make a brief conclusion, primarily to give you some next steps, other things that you can do, as you learn to work more with our. Now we have a lot of resources available here. Number one, we have additional courses on our in data lab.cc. And I encourage you to explore each of them. If you like our you might also like working with Python, another very popular language for working in data science, which has the advantage of also being a general purpose programming language. The things that we do in our we can do almost all the same things in Python. And it's nice to do a compare and contrast between the two with the courses we have at data lab.cc. I'd also recommend you spend some time simply on the concepts and practice of data visualization. R has fabulous packages for data visualization. But understanding what you're trying to get and designing quality ones is sort of a separate issue. And so I encourage you to get the design training from our other courses on visualization. And then finally, a major topic is machine learning or methods for processing large amounts of data, and getting predictions from one set of data that can be applied usefully to others. We do that for both R and Python, and other mechanisms here in data lab, take a look at all of them and see how well you think you can use them in your own work. Now, another thing that you can do is you can try looking at the annual R user conference, which is user with a capital R and an exclamation point. There are also local R user groups or rugs. And I have to say, unfortunately, there is not yet an official R day. But if you think about September 19, it's international talk like a pirate day. And we like to think as pirates say are and so that could be our unofficial day for celebrating the statistical programming language R. Any case, I'd like to thank you for joining me for this. And I wish you happy computing


Thank you to Scentbird for sponsoring this video. I have a TikTok. And it is public, but there's certain parts of it that are kept from wandering eyes. And today I am going to expose my own TikTok likes. Let me give you a little tour of my 2024 extremely accurate birds calendar. So a few years ago, I got into birding and I decided to challenge myself to draw realistic birds. And I made a calendar out of my early attempts, but I think this year's is my best yet. I love my toys. I thought this is a dunk. Leosteers. Harry loves the largest fish of its time. Well, the dunk, Leosteers, he gives so much knowledge about dinosaurs head and a face only a mother could love to look. Oh, yeah, definitely. It's the dunk Leosteers. I love it. So many of the comments like, I miss playing, bro. Going to get the cast. Leaving. Made it. Backing up to the barn. It's so good. Got most of them loaded. Made it to the pasture. Unloading. Grandpa said he would get the rest. It does make me miss playing. When was the last time you played, dude? I want to play. This one is, this one is filmed so well. Come on. Look at him. But wait, no, Steve. Steve is falling. Can he get there in time? Oh, so good. It's a marmot. Look at his toes. They're so long.  Oh, look at the way he, I love the way he shifts his weight around. Look at him. Look at his, look at his like pecs. Look at his physique. Like he's just always in his own world. He really quiet for real, let's he know you. Funny as hell, though.  I want to own it. This one's been gone around recently. I really like it. You can do a plain bagel, cream cheese.   Right on top. I'm going to do an everything bagel, lox, cream cheese, and then I'm going to do a double poop scoop on it. Double poop scoop. I'm going to do a mickey. I'm going to do a bacon egg and cheese and do a smear of poop. Not too much, though. Joey, what's the Hershey's squirt? Eight pounds of poop? Yeah, I'll try it. Eight pounds of poop. I love how much it escalates from how to get a smear of poop. Joey, what's the Hershey's squirt? Eight pounds of poop? This is the best cheers I've ever seen, and it's from Mr. Worldwide. Life is not a waste of time, and time is not a waste of life.  This is Hans never coming up with the interstellar thing. What to do, Hans? Ready? Wait for it. You have to wait for Hans to come up with this genius. Hans, let yourself cook. Oh, oh, that's right, Hans. Oh, Hans. Hans. Oh, Hans. You've did it again. You've did it again. Oh, Hans. I've got it. Christopher. Christopher, I've got it. Oh, this is taking any kind of shot ever with friends and trying to pretend like you like it. Teeth chattering. Listen, I might not be crank gameplays anymore, but I know that so many of you are gamers. And if there's one thing I know about gamers, is that we stinky. But thanks to Scentbird, we can change our fate. And we can start smelling good. Traditionally, if you're wanting to smell good, you have to buy an entire bottle of cologne. It's expensive, and if you don't really like it after a bit, you're just stuck with a big old bottle. But thanks to Scentbird, you can change that. Scentbird is a fragrance subscription service that lets you try designer fragrances for just $17. They sent me all these different designer fragrances so that I'm not just stuck with one big bottle of cologne. I can have a bunch of different fragrances for every day of the week. I can try them out and also not be worried about being wasteful because each bottle has a nice amount of scent in it. Each of these fragrances are a 30 day supply. So you can try the scent out before committing to a whole bottle.  Scentbird sent me five different fragrances. And my top three were definitely Gucci, Dolce & Gabbana, and then Midnight Gold. A lot of them were more like oaky and earthy and I really, really liked those ones a lot. And again, this is super, super cost effective. Designer fragrances can be $3 to $500 for full size bottles. And with Scentbird, it's just $17. And again, it's super easy to use. I got this Gucci scent. Comes in this container, snap it together. All you do is twist and spray. And there. Gamer sent no more.  Also, if you're wanting to bring these on the go, they are super small. Easily can fit this into a bag or purse or even just your pocket. So if you'd like to start smelling better with Scentbird, you can go and click the link in the description and you can use my code Nester for 55% off your first order. Again, just click the link in the description or you can scan the QR code on screen and use code Nester at checkout. They had to have set this up, right? They had to. There's no way that this dog and piggy and ducks are all just sleeping together naturally like this. Snoozing. They had to have set this up, right? I don't want them to have to set it up because I want them to naturally be such good friends like that, but I just don't know if I believe it. Oh my God. It's gonna be one. Oh, this is so good. This is people playing airsoft. I'm sorry, I'm so good. Where you want it? Right now. Watch how he just straight up robs this kid. Hell yeah. Y'all remember streaming during COVID? Best streaming time ever. Got to say it, nobody was doing anything. All friends could do was stream, play games together. Animal Crossing? You remember my Animal Crossing era? Damn, I feel like him right now. This is me. Hey, sorry I didn't respond to your text. I don't know who I am. Sorry, I have currently, I will let you know what the damage is. I have 5,176 unread emails. I have 291 voicemails. I have 194 text messages. And then I have 262 notifications from Discord. Whoops. Happy birthday to Lisa Hubbard. Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday to Ian. Happy birthday dear Ian. Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday to Josh. Okay, that's a no, I'm sorry. Oh my God, this is where I want to be. Why is the monkey ambient so beautiful? Is it really the first time? Camera of Voldemort? Is Voldemort getting attacked by monkeys? Hello, Amanda. You don't know me, but...  I want a short girl to bring out hair. You know what I want? I want peace on earth. Goodwill to men. Can't always get what we want. I love Brittany Broski so much.  I want Brittany Broski on the podcast, real bad. I think Brittany Broski is like one of the funniest people on the internet. And I love that she has a podcast with just herself. You just gotta keep living, man. L-I-V-I-N. This is extremely true. If I ever tell you that I'm buzzed, I'm not. I'm one drink away from blacking out. Another one of this. This is the same pig from before. God, I want this. I want this. Shredding at Walmart. Come on. Come on. Dude, hit the gap. Oh, my God. Are you kidding me?  Mary is also one of my... I'm talking about Mary's TikToks. They're so funny. Bed with a blankie and stuffed moose. But really, it's not that embarrassing when you think about the people who still sleep in bed with someone they don't love anymore. I don't remember this TikTok, but I'm really glad that I have it. You just have a cow in your room. Your cow is just there. Like a normal animal. One thing I will say, I do love that your cow matches your... Don't let your cow drink your coffee. I love that your cow matches all your furniture and things. I just, I do want to... Okay, adventure to the bar. Okay, okay. Never mind. I was about to say, because from the first, from this and this, I'm like, okay, do you live in an apartment with a cow? First of all, how did your landlord let you do that?  But it looks like this person has an actual like barn and like place for the cow to roam. And you have a place to... Okay, here we go, exploring. There's a lot of stuff. Okay, cool. I'll allow it. Mixing up of the vibe here. Look at this guy. Similar to the Marmot. The top comment, he think everything again, bro. Whoa. But look at him at the very end. This gives the most Frank from Shameless vibes. Look at him. Oh, he's happy.    Why is this so true though?  Die immediately. This is me. Don't worry. I'm not gonna do what everyone thinks I'm gonna do.  This one is so good and makes me so upset that it exists. Watching Casanet. Do you think Bo Burnham has seen this? That part. It, I mean, it's pretty good. That I should go and live amongst goats. Don't you think for a video, I should go and live amongst goats? I think I could fit in pretty well. Well, everyone, that's all of the TikToks that I have for you today. I know that I didn't show you every single one of them, far from it. But, you know, I have to save some content for later for when I inevitably run out of an idea and I need to recycle the same one over and over again. Okay? Let me know what you thought. Also, use, put on the Crank Gameplay subreddit. I want you to send me sad TikToks, okay? Sad tear jokers.  Anyway, see you guys later.


Hi and welcome to the session. I am Deepika here. Let's discuss the question. Differentiate the following with respect to x e to the power x plus e to the power x square plus so on plus e to the power x raise to power 5. So let's start the solution. Let y is equal to e raise to power x plus e raise to power x square plus so on till e raise to power x5. Differentiate with respect to x, we get dy by dx is equal to dy dx of e raise to power x plus dy dx of e raise to power x square plus dy dx of e raise to power x cube plus dy dx of e raise to power x4 plus dy dx of e raise to power x5. So dy by dx is equal to now derivative of e raise to power x with respect to x is e raise to power x. Now plus derivative of e raise to power x square with respect to x is e raise to power x square into dy dx of x square plus e raise to power x cube into dy dx of x cube plus e raise to power x4 into dy dx of x4 plus e raise to power x5 into dy dx of x raise to power 5. Therefore dy by dx is equal to e raise to power x plus 2x into e raise to power x square plus derivative of x cube is 3x square into e raise to power x cube plus 4x cube into e raise to power x4 plus 5x4 into e raise to power x5. So the answer for the above question is e raise to power x plus 2x into e raise to power x square plus 3x square into e raise to power x cube plus 4x cube into e raise to power x4 plus 5x4 into e raise to power x5. This is our answer. I hope the question is clear to you. Bye and have a nice day.