That just after dark and we're back with unfiltered and uncensored talk from young alumni Historically black colleges and universities dialogue on the pressing issues facing the HBCU community nationwide Got a full house tonight or is the Morganite Fred brother Eric? Dr. Dr. Oona. I don't even know to call it Oona or even Dr. Oona's here at the Hamptonian My brother Katie will cop and lower by way of anti and tailor the Hamptonian and tiff About to be thrown off the show. So Tonight's topic is allegations against one Mary better gasman formerly of you pins Center on Minority Serving Institutions and now I guess starting this week Rutgers universities Center of the same operation also a chair the Samuel DeWitt proctor Research on equity and social justice. So if you haven't read it, it's been quite the talk of the HBCU community over the last 24 hours allegations of Improper sexual comments behavior Pressure against graduate students working under dr. Gasman's office while at you pin dating back several years They've not risen to any level of criminal investigation. There's no indication that they led to her being dismissed or fired What it is to say that this was an investigation launched by the institution to which they've responded today to say That they don't discuss personnel issues, but they are aggressive about making policy and culture That is intolerant of sexual harassment. So you can take that for what you will tonight. We discuss the HBCU ramifications of it Scandal and Influence on the culture and everything in between so We begin With tiff about to be thrown off the show. Um, this broke.  Um, I Think it was yesterday morning. I woke up to the text and the emails About this story. When did you become familiar with it? And what was your initial reaction to it? In a group chat not not the larger digest after dark one but aside group chat and Initially not surprised We're talking about a white woman who has made a name for herself a platform for herself and Allegedly for others Particularly has become a champion in our community and then she does things that really only that really make us look at Her like you're not really that much different than the white people that we know Our outtakes for our bodies our labor our minds XYZ so that's when I say I I'm not surprised when white people do what white people do that is what I mean. I Mean they have a lot of things in common Now I will say that's mad racist with art I Mean well, let me ask so who else is on February there you work in higher education You have familiarity with Gasmus research and I guess her influence or presence in the sector. What was your reaction to the story? First time hearing it I audibly gaffaud I laughed extremely loud But you know, it's like what's it said it's like that's typical I Asked I think I asked a question. I can't remember how long ago it was where I was wondering like those who don't have a Natural stake in HPC use like don't have a connection for themselves Sometimes I always wonder what is the impetus to actually get involved? What is the reasoning that somebody would? Dedicate their life to work into something that this will culturally have no connection to I guess sometimes I can be a personal fetish Well that that's what made me laugh about it because Truth be told and I won't disclose all the details. I've kind of seen that inaction in person With her that's not to say that these allegations are true, but it is to say that Like most of you said I'm not surprised It also is to say that this is this is really unique in the power dynamic in higher education so it's not unusual to hear about You know faculty and Department chairs and they work with you know graduate students or even undergraduates and they say, you know, I think you ought to You know pursue this you ought to pursue this as a dissertation topic Or you ought to do this as a capstone project and they kind of leverage even in most of the time in an unspoken way Do this or I'm not gonna really give you all the help that I can give you or I want to give you Do what I want you to do And sometimes that that creeps into areas of you know, social or interpersonal sexual impropriety Typically at least in the mainstream there's been white men doing that This is the first time we've seen a white woman or you know one of the few times We've seen a white woman at the center of the allegation and they apparently are receipts So does that change the game for the way that you think about this? No, because power Okay, power don't change It doesn't Eric was it was it any different for you? I'm actually surprised it came out because it's a white woman to be frank. I mean That that out that I mean despite the person's name I just was surprised that it came out It could have been any white woman that has enough power in higher education or anything The fact that it came out about her especially out against black people Yeah, that's the most surprising part Honestly, what did you think about the nuts and bolts of the story itself? One of the interesting things is that the people who all made the claim were anonymous now If you know anything about, you know sexual assault sexual harassment There's a great deal of embarrassment that that people who are subjected to that stuff feel and they don't Necessarily in all cases want to be revealed to be the subject of an inquiry or a story like that But it is to say that we are in the midst of a culture where people are becoming more and more Comfortable with putting a name face image video out about these kind of claims. Did you think that it was unusual? Power dynamic aside that no one was on the record to say yes I want my name to be associated with the claim that this lady made me feel uncomfortable on the job I don't think you can do power dynamic aside because these are people who work in a field that she has a significantly heavy name in um I think that's a very strong part of it. What what I am interested in seeing is that if now that somebody has already dropped the first, you know Bit of information how many people Was anonymous or otherwise are going to come out and also substantiate what's been said We've already seen that a lot of people have come out And said, oh that wasn't my experience And there's been other conversations in other places where people have said, yo that actually makes sense So I wonder how much is how much is actually going to come out because of it What well This is going to lend itself to the cultural conversation later But I think it's appropriate here the reaction from the hbcu community A number of defenders Do you have a problem With the defenders or is it, you know, everybody has a right to their interpretation and their allegiances What are your feelings on the folks from the hbcu community? Coming out to saying this isn't what I know of her. I don't believe it and even if it is true What is anybody going to do about it or should anybody do anything about it? I think people should kind of just monitor business for a little bit Especially if that wasn't their own experience, right? So like sure that was your experience with this person But that does not mean that What has been said is also untrue um It's like and honestly like nobody asked you If you get to a point where it's like you're stepping out there and saying well, that wasn't my experience like what does that do For you in this in this situation To come out and say that oh no, that was a situation.  Oh, no, I'm defending this person when nobody knows the facts Despite what's already been put out there. I just think you know It's a it's a weird kind of like crabs in the bushel type mentality where it's like As opposed to you know being supportive of the fact that there's some people who've had a negative experience You're using that as a as a leveraging point To kind of elevate yourself Whether it be purposely or be implicitly or explicitly It it looks just it looks really this Cowardly and kind of soft in that way. Let me just ask the question flat out. Is she that powerful? in our sector I mean, look, I I'm I'm about to be in my fourth term in my higher air program I in the fourth I've taken I'm about to take my 9th 10th and 11th courses in my program I've literally seen her name More times than I can count As an author on many books, I've heard her referenced by many people more times than I can count The the influence on the power is real to the point that no one No one has any inclination to say this. We cannot accept this This is so Fascinating to me because so many people had a visceral Reaction when presidents from hbc use met with trump and this is the president in the united states level my hatem That was the president of the united states and people said absolutely do not go Absolutely do not go do not broker with him. Do not look for anything from him Do not look for any resources to come from his his signature And this is for all intents and purposes. This is a professor At a school that ain't even hbcu How do you wheel that much influence that you can make a sector thousands of people at hundreds of institutions say nothing Honestly at this point it kind of goes back to something that Tiffany spoke about Almost years ago at this point, which is After all of this, what are people going to do at hbcu's about making sure that we Control the narrative of our institutions. We're the ones researching our own institutions We're the ones creating centers about our own institutions about as far as research and what we're doing to get better as opposed to Always trying to invite somebody to cook out Well and does that in so what's the future of that then? Tiff I mean because I would ask you there's a there's a lot of good White people that work at hbcu. They've they've committed their lives to work at institutions. No, we're not but when I'm saying this That's why you have to be careful With the I mean Eric's point is well taken but you got to be you know, you got to be careful with that cookout You know kind of kind of allegory because it's There are a lot of people that have you know have given time talent and treasure to it And care more authentically and are willing to check their privilege in a different way and are willing to not work with those people daily not talking about them So I mean, so what is the analysis then for them? At the same time i'm not asking for them to check Heart it's not for at this point it's not for regular Employees and administrators to do who needs to check her I would say very carefully that um I think we we all need to lean into collective working responsibility and resistance And we know what that is and what that looks like Are we really resistant one person? um Like is that is that necessary the way that y'all talk or the way that this is looking since yesterday into getting getting to today For one person. Oh, absolutely because it's one person got everybody shook and ain't nobody saying nothing And keep in mind just one other point before we go to our first break She hasn't responded at all to any of these allegations. She said not a word Exactly. So I don't know if that's arrogance I don't know if there's certainty that is false Not that's power Like she doesn't have to say anything Not like word and she knows for the most part Then came out and said what they had to say about it Rutgers came out and said what they had to say about it She's probably just sitting back like I'm good. I said what I said And you know what like Jared? You said that this is fascinating for you I would like to add to the fascinating list because at the same time Remember I've been asking and tweeting about How publicly Nobody has really stepped up to say anything about what Morris brown has been doing for the last 17 years and holding them accountable for You know still going out to ask Oh lord, I do get that I do get that point I'm going with this that's fascinating as well. I do there are certain things that people will step up and say But at the same time you want to talk about power tiff just talked about 17 years of institutional mishaps Morris brown college and she co-signed the person who's now president of the school Right, so like I knew y'all No, because like at some point if you actually do care about these schools Like if it's not just like something that sure that you know that you can find your own little line in because You look the part to get the approval of certain people And you and you have this other side of you which you know may or may not allegedly is a fetish for other things that are black then Like do you really care about these schools doing better or do you care enough about these schools? To research them to this You know, you know to benefit your own pockets because to this day For the 22 plus million dollars of money she's received to do research on hbc use I cannot find any evidence of how any of that money has went towards improving any of the schools That's a point. That's a point and um, I'm sure that there is But the fact that she's so outgoing and she's so noticeable in press That is an excellent point to say then where then how did your work become transformational for the sector you Allegedly serve That is something that we have to hold To account and I hope that we do in the weeks and months after this to come We're going to take our first quick break when we come back we're going to talk about some cultural implications Tied to the the revelations about dr. Gassman. That just at the dark. We'll be right back That just at the dark and we're uh continuing the conversation about the recent allegations made against HBC researcher ivy league professor mary bet gasman We wrapped up conversation about the Logistics or the dynamics of the story and now we want to talk about some of the cultural implications and the first That comes in to mind for me Is we and we talked about this in the first segment a little bit. We've already come off of a big year With hbc use institutionally trying to figure out how do they deal With instances and handling and reporting Responsibilities in sexual assault sexual harassment, right And now we have somebody who's in the hbc orbit accused of that stuff Because of the institutional responsibility we have to to show improve that we take that matter seriously Um, I would ask you two guys and I think we have uh Taylor the hamptonian and kd one Because of that do we have a extra responsibility to speak up about this and make it clear What our stance is on this lady? because most of her professional profile is built On hbc research. Um, I think it's very important for institutions to respond on this topic. Um, Anyone who ever listens to the podcast or anyone who ever listens to me? They always know that I talk about the godlike complex that operates within Our institutions within our systems within our administration the folks who support us and those who who don't And so I always know that our students always look to our institutions and our senior leadership when things hit the fan um, our students know who Mary Beth gasman is um, they know her because everything that we cite everything we talk about typically comes from her Um, she's featured um in documentaries Um, like let's not forget. She's in telling what we are rising Let us not forget that she's a very um, she she's in there a lot talking about the history So it's not only that our students have seen her we have prospective students who are seeing her In this light we have folks who may not even know or have even thought about hbc use but now The news of this is coming up. So I think it's very important for us to to have the conversation to talk about her And to talk about how this is affecting us because Us being quiet For me, I take it as we are okaying the godlike experience and and it's so funny because What was it the situation with papa johns, right? So papa johns owner Or the front-facing guy of the company He gets he gets caught up for making racist statements Morehouse immediately says you're out of here. We're not having papa johns on campus um I don't know if other hbc's threw them off campus, but they made clear, you know, we condemn the remarks In some respect Where is that? Where is the condemnation? here Katie and why do you think that it's it's slow to come When this is such a this seems to be such an easy This is a layup We don't we don't support sexual harassment Right and so I think um, can you hear me? Yeah Okay, and so I think part of it is because the uh The students who made the allegations wanted to remain anonymous Um, and so because you can't put a face to a victim It's easy to kind of skirt the issue um, and then part of it is because I think I think we take for granted how much of us do research In the community within the community because as a stem major she didn't come across Any of my studies, right?  And so in order for for the story to really hit home You gotta give it time for everybody to see and I think the people that Deal with her research the research directly are more appalled because like y'all have been saying she's been cited so many times And so much of her research has been used in order for other students to get doctorate. I'm assuming I think it's it's at that level There's always there's already inherent an inherent belief amongst even people within the community I'm not an ally and that I only want to see Um, you know the best for people like myself directly like black men and not everybody that's in the community Um, so I think some of it is people just like protecting themselves and I I'm not criticizing this white woman I don't want to be that that that swore that to be the sword that I die on So there's always this this burden of diversity that's on black people. We always have to be the ones that are Trying to make white folks comfortable with the idea of Getting rid of your racist ways So that that that burden do you think that this carries over in this respect? That we don't want to we don't want to be the ones stirring the pot on a on a potentially racial and sexual issue Yes Yes, I have to believe that because apparently there's money tied into this too. So I don't want her um Her um, you know being as communicated from the hbcu community to affect 12 universities on the east coast We just have we I think that's why everybody's treating so lightly. We don't know how much she's actually tied into the community We all we only know about the research itself. We really don't know how much money She's connected to directly especially if you're telling me that she is connected to several doctors Like it's not like we got a bunch of them in america at least, you know in comparison to the rest of the world Like we got to protect everyone of our Our most, you know dedicated and committed professionals and I think that's what we're facing right now is Taking is just taking her down Take someone else down that we care about that is important to us That's a good point because she love her hater. She is a pipeline to doctoral degrees to Leadership positions for folks from hbcu's So taylor, do you think that it's worth saying we condemn this but you need to get right and get back on track So we can keep this pipeline going I think so here's the issue that I have is that we We are talking a lot about how the power that she holds and The money the pipeline The access that she has But there are students who are saying that they have been harmed by this right And let us not forget that these students are are also our future pipelines for not only hbcu's but for all msi's She also hand like her institution Her her whole thing is not just hbcu's she focuses on tribal colleges She focuses on anapesies. So she focuses on and so I think Another thing that is also very interesting to me is that we also have just siloed her Into just the hbcu matter and I wonder what happens when we also discuss that no She also provides research on all minority serving institutions Will that get folks to start talking again?  Um, how do we talk about who else is being affected by this? And so I like to challenge folks to think to also talk about it's not just hbcu's and those Who are affected by her research as well? She does it for offer a vast majority of minority serving institutions and so Again, I I I I wonder about those And the tribal colleges those and anapesies those and hispanic serving institutions What were their thoughts because everything has been quiet? I haven't seen much and for me I I want folks to understand that we have students who we have anonymous folks who have Studied under her We have folks who have worked with her who are who are saying that they've been harmed in this manner And we are discussing like well, we I don't know because money we might get affected by this And at what at what point do we stop by money? At what point do we stop by? Um, we might not get that publication We might at what point do you pull the card and say we have folks who are saying they are harmed? And we need to listen and understand what is going on I'm not saying that we need to pull out and pull and stay and in charger and put the gavel down on her now But I I literally wanted to sit and say we have folks who are saying that they are harmed by someone We have allowed to to be almost like a guiding light and a pillar in this space And what happens when we ignore that and say nothing that is what I I want to see that Are we doing that because she's white? Are we doing that because what we have the same reaction? If it was a brother or a sister in the same exact position at the same exact school That happened to be sexually harassing brothers and sisters who are graduate students If it was if it was one of us what we had the same reaction I think it's kind of hard to say no because of I think whiteness plays a part in it I think gender plays a part in it so we're talking a lot about different Identities that do have power play in this So I believe there is an influence of whiteness And white supremacy in the essence of power through whiteness that is informing how we even maneuver this space Oh, I'm sorry. Go ahead there Katie you were gonna add something I didn't have anything I agree that I think whiteness was keeping this from um Really addressing it in a fruitful manner and I also think it's just the fact that so many of these big students are anonymous But I think that that kind of makes it difficult to you know Just just cold her accountable is because well nobody you know for now is the speculation. It's just allegation I disagree mainly because a lot of institutions have anonymous bias reporting systems that get people taken out And so there are institutions have anonymous reporting tools to get folks taken out And so if I can argue I for me I struggle with oh you didn't reveal yourself. We can't take her out because We have we there are places that have anonymous reporting tools in place to still have um Reprimanded happen so they can still protect the space of students And so that's where I disagree with it Because there are systems in place for anonymous reporting so that students and those who in faculty staff whomever are making the reports can do so Here's what here's what's interesting about it. So we just a few weeks ago had an instance where Morehouse was in the spotlight because a student came but got on twitter and basically Out of himself I mean to the world and said Here's this is my name Here's my situation and here's a person by name who is harassing me same kind of situation um But and that made national news This situation where gasman has not And it's almost the exact same situation a In fact, she had a higher position of authority than the person at Morehouse That was on abc news. That was on you know Time that was on all kinds of major outlets associated press this story at this point hasn't gotten there yet And do you do you think that is the the reason is because No one has picked up on the fact that she was doing this to black people Or it was because it wasn't done at an hbcu or because she's white Because clearly there's a disparity in the in the reporting on this So do you think that there's an obligation at if we say nothing else? That somebody has to stand up and say okay The reporting on this the reporting on this story is wrong Because you did this to Morehouse, but you won't do it to you pin So are you asking who's going to be a champion for black people who champions that If you don't want to talk about if we're not going to take the step of saying We reject her in the community And it doesn't appear that we will because I haven't heard any presidents come out I've heard very few students come out. I mean people are sub tweeting But I've heard very little reaction in comparison to when things like this happen on our campus So who comes out and at least makes the point a look the reporting on this is wrong Our being champions for ourselves Should not be taken or conflated with us Rejecting her it's just that you're deciding to protect those Who you're responsible for educating and growing And if that means drawing a line in the sand Against a person who is reported to have done Certain things Then yeah, that's what you need to do Yeah, it shouldn't it shouldn't really have anything to do with who she is as a person Because you should be doing this for anybody who decides to attack people in this manner It shouldn't it shouldn't be a question Who takes who takes the lead on that is the students because I told somebody today And I've had people calling me all day Um, and one of the one of the thoughts that I have on this is there's two groups in my mind That make this story get bigger One is black graduate students Who turn this into a you know a me too moment With her is kind of the the capstone figure of how this happens to them The other is white male faculty at PWIs Who say no no no no no wait a minute You all get us like this all the time And we get our careers destroyed Why hasn't she I might have a dumb question.  There are none of those No, it might be we're about to find out When have white men and women turned on each other in this manner though? Oh Oh pretty regularly I'm just I'm trying to I'm trying to I don't see that being a thing at least for this And I agree with tiffany in in one case because um, just something completely off topic, right? But joe wash is running for president, you know in the republican party And we are familiar with politics, you know that joe wash has been A prototypical a-hole towards obama and his whole camp, you know His whole run as president and like the one of the big tea party champion And so he got up on msnbc and asked for everybody's forgiveness And i'm just sitting here like hold on hold on hold on hold on.  So why is it that we should forgive you as a community? And then here come um, joe scarbrough. I mean all you can do is ask for forgiveness.  You just gave him a pass and like so I don't know that they will ever like like Honestly, I don't I don't see it only because Let me say let me say this I think that there's there's a there's a sense that it might happen And the reason is you got to think about where this was reported This story was broken in inside higher ed If you know anything about inside higher ed Anything they do on hbcu's is going to include a quote from mary beth gasman. Yep anything That's valid the rare the rare opportunities where they're actually covering hbcu's For more than something like struggle or losing accreditation or we ain't got no money or crime No matter what is coming out of their pages Mary Beth gasman is going to be quoted in that in that publication As the hbcu expert quote unquote. So for them to have ran that In inside higher ed Right So for them for that publication to have run that story That was a big deal That to me was a signal of that. Yeah, they'll turn on you I hope so But in case they don't you know, I'm not surprised But but do I think I think it's it's a matter of who builds the coalition because I did notice last night At least on twitter. I didn't check all social media, but at least on twitter there were quite a few White female advocates hbcu advocates who said this is embarrassing and even worse because she's a white woman. They didn't even Run away from the racial part of this So can I say this out loud too? Hopefully um, I'm gonna be careful with this and I apologize if it offends anybody But I think I'm gonna just assume that this is a heterosexual white woman Yes Well, if you look at the if you look at the quotes in inside higher ed Oh, we can make that assumption Okay, and so I'm assuming that most of her victims are black men That they didn't say I don't know. I don't know. I just think that depends on like who was complaining to or well making inappropriate comments about somebody's body Or what you think their relationship status is with somebody that's all that's out of line That's true In that regard too And then, you know, I don't know people like to make small talk.  Never mind You said a whole lot and now you're gonna stop short. Okay. Um, you know what? We're gonna take a second break and when we come back. Uh, we're gonna talk about the future for hbc using the relationship with Uh, mary beth gasman. That just at the dark will be right back That just at the doctor. We're back. Uh, we're talking about, um karate black belts and black shorts in the in the off um in the off time um We got or is the morganite on, uh, Dr. Ona and laurel from anti so Most of this conversation has revolved around this lady got to get up out of here Nobody's really taken a stake in getting her about it here and what What credibility do we have to address issues like this on campus if we don't pursue getting her up out of here But then I think that the other conversation has to revolve around now who fills her shoes And for so many years you've heard people saying Why does it have to be mary beth gasman, you know speaking on our behalf? We got plenty of researchers. We got plenty of researchers on campus doing this Well, two questions is who and how do we get them to a place where they're getting as much if not more recognition than she I know what our role is We keep having them on same thing that we did with roland martin Memo Sorry It always comes back to morris brown and roland martin It sure does at some point. That's where it's going to go. Ona. You are a phd um three-time hbc graduate What is the process of Getting out there and having research elevated to the point of being recognized What does the and what is the the role of the individual faculty member and the role of the institution in making that happen? Well for one it's making sure that We own our own like simply it's not even like a complicated thing I've always asked why is she there? How did she get there who put her there who gave her this title? I got questions And nobody got answers. So For one it's owning that tiff always brings up what you say tiff About doing what where at morris brown, huh? What? Oh, shoot. What do I be saying? Oh, god taking it to Taking it to The hub instead of having it at these Right, right. I did I did say all right. I'm trying to you know give you your credit. Um, no doubt no doubt And making sure that that happens I'm still like I need answers as to how we got here because this is before my time I mean, I'm old, but I'm not that old. So I need to I still don't get how we how Did we get here? I think I think that it was just that she Was doing work that was novel for somebody like her to be doing And she happened to be doing it at a campus that provided the engine for a lot of media attention So it's one thing if you're a researcher at Morgan or howard It's another thing that you pin because Associated Press USA Today Those major daily newspapers will look at an email from you pin differently than they would look at one from howard for better or for worse fair or unfair We we agree there, right? And they will and they will look at the headshot of the lady who's saying i'm an hbcu expert a white lady with glasses Then they would assist it with locks or a brother with a goatee That's you know, so that that's how we that's how we got here um The question is if this doesn't stop because she's going to keep going she was quoted today in an article on will before us Yeah, I've seen that joint not being able to make it And her quote I believe was something along the lines of it is hard to resuscitate a brand that's already, you know, kind of known for being in a position of struggle so Laurel if you if you consider that we're already we're already kind of behind the scratch line In that our experts are not white They send their emails from hbcu.edu email addresses um Is there is there a future where you can effectively replace her? Or have some people replace her as authoritative experts on hbcu's From that replacement to happen and this kind of correlates with Behold sexual harassment sexual assault situation in general Once people bother enough to listen to those who are affected that's when it'll actually change But as long as you still ignore those voices and say okay between this person and that person I'm going to go with the one that has the title Or i'm going to go with the white person over the non-white person Even if I don't explicitly say that implicitly that's what that's what keeps happening So it's like until people actually take accountability for like wait I didn't give this person a fair shot because of my You know, unacknowledged biases or whatever you want to call it And put this person forward because we actually want to bother to hear something different. So I feel like Even not even thinking about this situation Specifically I just feel like until people are actually bothered enough To actually practice what they preach instead of just saying oh, this is messed up. This is wrong This shouldn't happen We really care about you know, our students and our staff and we don't stand by this at all It's kind of like the lip service. Nobody wants to hear that anymore It's like what are you what are you going to do and back it up with policy and action? Because it's the same as these schools that say oh i'm committed to diversity yet I look at your faculty and there's only two people that aren't white Oh, we're evenly split between men and women though You know, we We're evenly split between people who came from you know non ivy league schools So, you know, the the it's a moving target on how we defend the diversity today, you know what I mean but Even even with that Or as I would ask you this question Because you jump back and forth in between morgan and and fan view cultures Do you think that this is something that hbcu culture can take a stake in because in theory Well, not even in theory in reality. This is ivy league issue This didn't happen in one of our schools. It didn't even happen with one with some of our students It happened with some of our alumni So it wasn't like these were students enrolled at hbcu's in the most in most cases this didn't happen on our campus It didn't happen with our resources in question.  So I would preface it by this the first thing is that the ivy league is an athletic conference It is not a standard of academic excellence, right and I think that I'm not saying that we're reiterating that by saying because she did it at ivy league school that That gives her more reverence, but I think that Sometimes even we as hbcu stakeholders feed into An inferiority complex about our own schools by Then praising other schools because she's at university of pennsylvania And then she goes to rector's which is which is technically an ivy league school based on it being started, you know During the 1600s as queen's college and then becoming a state university in jersey, but that's whole it doesn't matter I think that I think that I'm gonna put this I don't I don't know. I really don't know. I don't know if if if there's a a proper way to move forward With her or without her or someone like her unfortunately hbcu's are in a really tough position Not just because of our resource, but also geographically When you talk about the schools that are really in a strong position to get Media attention for their research. There's probably Five or six that you could say are in Areas that are large enough to generate type of national attention Obviously howard is the the the prize of that and then you can look at morgan You can look at a school like ant because it is so large Or even school like tsu because it's in a major city like houston, but besides that there's really not a lot of schools that Research is going to be able to reach those ap's those new york times the washington post that type of type of attention, so I think that Fundamentally we're in a really Grave situation because she has been such a big voice for our schools be it be a good or bad She's had a voice and it has bring brought some attention to our institutions and brought in some research, but Um, I think that she carries so much weight people aren't going to want to follow behind her Regardless, I don't think anyone wants to wants to be the person who quote on corporate places. Mary Beth gasman be a good or bad Um, and I think that leaves a large gap Um between kind of the researchers that are is done by our schools and then what is actually, you know being Produced and shown throughout the the country Do you think that it also comes down to a resource question or a priority question? This is actually for all three of you because one of the ways that she made her hay Is that she was willing to do the surveys and the interviews and this the conversations about stuff And creating data on things that hbc used individually and collectively had not done So that was part of the way that she became You know the juggernaut in the sector is because she was doing work that no one else was doing Um, and now we are doing that, but we're we're we're playing catch up So can you do institutions have to make a a commitment to invest in that kind of those kind of research? I mean, but institutions are I mean, I mean we you just had the a uc guy on a couple a couple months ago I mean there are institutions and and the a uc consortium and different institutions that are Putting that forward, but at the end of the day, but let's be out to be real I mean she's coming she worked at a school Like web u-pin which has a business school that raises, you know hundreds of millions of dollars per decade um that Get shared throughout the institution. I mean she she was open to a lot of a lot of long money I mean, let's not forget u-pens probably most famous alumni at the current president of the united states So I mean she had a huge platform. I don't think there's any I think it'd be wrong for us to say we can We can try to recreate the platform that she had because I don't think that we have the ability to Based on our resources, but we can produce meaningful research Over time It's just I just think that I think that trying to recreate what she's done in any in any type of way It puts the bar at a place that's not Going to be beneficial to our schools. We have to create our own Type of of research and create our own type of way of putting that out there That's unique to us that can speak to our institutions Because even like taylor said, you know, she didn't just focus on hbcu. She focused on msi So there really isn't a sector everybody's in a research center that we can think of a top of our head that Slowly focused on hbcu's in the same way. So there still is some some area of growth there It's a gag is that it already exists Whether it's been published or not is another conversation entirely but to say that oh, it's just not available. Oh, it's available But is it being funded? No Is the emphasis being put behind it are people getting support not just faculty support Institutional support or is it institution not able to support it because they're too busy putting out fires Are dealing with other things that actually are not that this isn't a priority But they're a more urgent priority, right? And that and that's the problem even when you're trying to do research in this space The only available availability is research with her name on it Now there are people who have been able and it's hard that they've been able To publish dissertations or do their research without citing her once But it's difficult Some people do it on purpose purposely boycotter stuff exactly Because you've been at hbc using pwy's to scale are the things that we can do That make it so at least in black media at least in black communities at least on black twitter or whatever the case may be That we can do something to scale that that starts the process of growing our own research brand growing our own narrative creation All of this is at what cost Because when it comes down to it There were students there who trusted And their trust was violated And when that happens, who are we going to have to continue these These studies this research What does that look like so yeah, we get x amount of dollars, but then at what cost? What does that look like? Because if everybody is surrounded is surrounding this woman and watching her research and doing everything that she's saying do What what are we really coming up with? What does that look like? Because if we're not making gah no, that's an excellent point because I just thought about it when we talked about earlier all the defenders that she has Are those folks now that they if they leave her are they coming to hbc using are they going to head up research things at our campuses? I don't even know that I want them to come And and and they're not I mean They're not coming to this again. They're not coming to our schools.  I work in I work in the private sector But from what I can see Most of these people who are african-american history, you know Savants they don't work at our schools. They don't teach our students The only people I see people on the rock newman show. That's it. He's the only one He's the only one that brings on hbc your faculty He brought on Shout out to rock newman, man rock rock new man had on my african-american history teacher for my freshman year fam He works at the bassoon mario bakal mathoom museum now and at um at bassoon kojo nami has them on too Yeah, but but but kojo's local So that's that's my man. That's my man from the city, but but kojo's local I'm saying rock newman is the only person I know and he's local as well who has acu faculty on who Speak on research. That's it Everybody else is like Oh, I work at ruckers. I work at berkeley. I work at usc They don't work at our schools Who's fault is that is it ours? Is there even is it even fault or is it just a reality that we have to do it? I think it's mostly reality I don't want to put fault there because people have different motivations for where they decide that they Willow won't work I think that I think that this should be a Defining moment for us to consider. Where do we put our priorities? as an institution I have my hand raised right now I would like to say That a i'm going to reiterate that the people That defend maria beth gasman Yeah, you can call them defenders But I think it's more appropriate to call them people who enable and are people who are apologists And if they'll ignore what she's been doing or allegedly has done, then they'll ignore it on campus too And we're gonna see that we for show hbcu's don't need that and if you think about What has driven people crazy about maria beth gasman? We can acknowledge and accept and even celebrate the fact that she's done some stuff for hbcu's She's helped some institutions get money. She's helped some students get through school. She's helped some students get phd's She's made some transformational opportunities for hbcu's to expand research What she's also done is injected a certain amount of white privilege into our culture anybody who can come in and and and Make comments on Florida a&m's presidential board issue and board issues and say this is this is sexism as finance And not just this is florida Or this is how the way they do business you don't know our culture when you come in and say Hbcu presidents ought not do business with donald trump Like we haven't done business with racist crooked white politicians since the beginning of time. You don't have a clue about our culture When you come in and say, you know, they're stupid, you know, I don't I don't You guys don't know how to leverage your brand when you don't even know the antagonistic Relationships that media outlets locally and nationally have had with hbcu's and continue to have It's clear you don't know our culture and the more and more she injects Privilege into our sector the more and more we suffer because she's a quote-unquote expert We have people who are teaching us how to do the thing But we don't like or said like laurel said like tay said like una said We don't have people Who want to pay attention To what it is that we can create for ourselves from what we do on our campuses every day and every semester and every year That doesn't mean that it's not happening. It just means people Choose to ignore it or choose a center someone named mary beth gasman who has a time in the resources And the white privilege to do the things that we've been doing So not it's offensive And when you're a black woman you get ignored extra hard. Oh for sure We're automatically muted in people's minds And then after you die, then oh, they were so great. This is what all they said Let's record everything that they said before And then use it now from the library and put you on a t-shirt lore. I retweet you all the time Yeah, I know I saw those And rest it Rest in peace for lorraine's handsberry rest in peace to tony morrison all of That what you just said and we're joking about it, but that's the problem because if you said, okay Who's great in in hbcu business? Somebody's gonna say civil mobly What what can she do now? If you said who's great in foreign affairs somebody, uh, oh, uh, wendy young You know, I mean like we get so hung up on The greatness of what we what we used to do that we don't even see that we're still doing it And that's why you can't advance anybody because we love love love Our tradition and our giants from yesteryear But we don't even look at the giants that we got walking among us right now. So I want to thank everybody. Um for tonight. This is a tremendous dialogue I know it was a difficult one to have but i'm glad that y'all took the bold step. Um, we learned tiff as a racist Um, hey, we did that learned Is that gonna make a final edit yeah, probably and then um I think it's a to the everybody's point about, you know, who gets ignored and who gets lifted up This is a perfect time to say please subscribe to the hbcu digest on patreon patreon.com slash hbcu digest Just one dollar a month for a tremendous hbcu news and commentary Um, so thank you Everyone for listening Um and and for for tuning in on series 142 HBC radio prior to the howard university radio network. This has been digest after dark We'll see are we are we doing this next week too? Look I wanted to do two in this week. We'll talk we'll talk off. We'll talk. Thank you for listening digest after dark peace


The study demonstrated that it was possible to implement a controlled clinical trial in a rural setting despite the lack of resources, inexperienced staff, and global inexperience with remote data monitoring. The use of local decentralization allowed for faster enrollment and more diverse participants representative of the target population. This article was authored by Yabraj said Hi, Melissa Sears, Alessandra Veki, and others.


Sir coming for hypokalemia, hypokalemia potassium anything above 5 to 5.5 is hypokalemia. There is always you have to understand whenever you see a potassium you make sure there is nothing there is something called pseudo hypokalimages very very common okay when there is emolysis tying a tarnike just tying a tarnike and drawing a blood itself can cause emolysis very very simple. Lot of people will come with 5.3 unexplained or 5.5 but we just ask then the next time I ask them not to tie a tarnike and draw a blood to potassium come back to normal. So there is a serum sometime you have a doubt you can also ask for a plasma potassium. Plasma potassium is always correct you should always ask for a plasma potassium. So I need counsel more than 50,000 can cause false hyperkalemia platelets more than 7.5 lakhs or muscle activity keep on puncturing the veins couple of times you puncture and then draw the blood forcefully where the blood is not coming you keep on puncturing that severely that is sure your number will come 6.5 or 7 potassium only because it can cause lot of you know addition acrosis right anything that happen emolysis, emolysis, any tumourless syndrome all these things can cause pseudo hyperkalemia and when somebody is on metaprolol. Among all the beta blockers metaprolol we see when somebody is on metaprolol that is known to cause again pseudo hyperkalemia the less is there are other things nebulol, bisaprolol are much better. So normally somebody needs a beta blocker but metaprolol is causing that we shift on to nebulol or bisaprolol, I have done excellent. Any advanced renal failure and all these things as you know that you can always have hyperkalemia. So looking at the ECG look at the normal ECG PQRS complex when potassium is 4 this normal somewhere between 6 to 7 we can have a tall peak T waves when somebody's potassium is 7 to 8 we can have a flattened P wave a prolonged PR interval depressed ST segment thing and a peak T wave again and 8 to 9 we will have a completely absence of the P wave prolonged QRS complex and this is sine wave potassium this sine wave and harassed when the potassium goes high this is the ECG what we have to look at. So hyperkalemia ECG it is an emergency the only way to treat that will be by calcium otherwise there is no rule of calcium anywhere I will talk about this more. So in acute treatment what we have to do so IV calcium whenever you have ECG changes only then the IV calcium helps others do not treat with IV calcium gluconate unnecessarily because it is of no use it will not help to decrease the potassium at all because IV calcium gluconate is only helpful when there is ECG changes because to when it acts on the myocardium when the myocardium is involved because of hyperkalemia only then the calcium gluconate can help to reverse that but it will not bring down the potassium making calcium gluconate. Immediately you can shift the potassium into cells by using glucose and insulin or acetylene that is beta 2 agonist removing the potassium from body the only way is by what you have a calcium polystyrene or sodium polystyrene that is what you have a k-bind or what you call as a k-x that is our loop diuretics so removing the potassium only these three things can do shifting the potassium into cells only glucose insulin and acetylene can do but blocks effect of hyperkalemia not only IV calcium can do so what's the mechanism of calcium gluconate so it raises the action potential that is the reason after once it raises action potential only then it will from the resting potential then it stabilizes the myocardium that is the use of calcium gluconate so you can get calcium gluconate in 10 ml IV or 2 to 3 minutes don't wait for an infusion over 100 ml or 1 hour or something just give 10 ml calcium gluconate 10 ml IV or 2 to 3 minutes under continuous but it has to be given under continuous ECG monitoring the effect starts within 1 to 3 minutes calcium gluconate starts within 1 to 3 minutes it will last for 30 to 60 minutes in case it is not settling down don't wait keep on repeating it repeat the dose if there's no improvement in abnormal ECG you repeat the abnormal ECG requires after initial improvement then again if the ECG can go back so under continuous monitoring you have to see again if required you repeat a calcium gluconate so again I'm telling the only advantage of IV calcium is when there's ECG changes there is no rule of IV calcium to remove the potassium from the body so what is insulin dextrose do so what we do is potassium is around 6 we get a call immediately patient has to go for OT you know we can immediately want to shift then you can use insulin dextrose what we normally do is you can use 25% dextrose 50 ml or 100 ml and add 8 units or 10 units of insulin okay this can be given over 1 hour what happens is a plasma potassium drops 0.5 to 1.2 milli equivalents per litre asset begins in 10 to 20 minutes and peak at 30 to 60 somebody is going to OT we need to correct immediately we give this give acetylene send them to OT and interoperately the anesthetist will manage about it so this will last for 4 to 6 hours again it is going to bounce back again the potassium is going to go high only thing is once you get this make sure you check the sugars what I tell is after giving insulin dextrose drip you give monitor sugar every hour for 3 hours watch for iboglazemia or otherwise just give 10% dextrose at 50 to 75 ml with close monitoring blood glucose to be used because when you give insulin dextrose you forget to check sugars lot of people we see having severe iboglazemia after that and hyperglazemia if somebody has 250 no need to give any high weight glucose at all directly you can give soda bicarbonate we always see in EER people a lot of people eating sodium bicarbonate please don't give there is no role of treatment of acute no role of soda bicarbonate as an acute agent only single agent in hyperglazemia so it can be in severe acidosis or hyperglazemia then we may try but you know otherwise isolated don't use soda bicarbonate at all side effect is hypernitrima in fact if you use soda bicarbonate it can cause volume overload palmedema will like will worsen palmedema and reduce anis calcium so coming to cation exchange disease like what we call as a k-bind normally we have sodium or calcium polystyrene sodium is not available anymore now so we use calcium polystyrene sulfonate that is what you get in k-bind it comes as 15 grams sachet so what happens as a 15 grams to 30 grams is every fourth hourly you have to mix it with unavailable water and you have to add a deflact syrup or sorbillin directly don't give the sorb k-bind with water alone it can cause severe constipation so whenever you get k-bind you just mix it in 15 grams one sachet and 1 ml saline of water water water and you add 10 or 20 ml of deflact or sorbillin mix everything and then you have to ask them to take it k-bind so 1 gram binds to 1 mL increments of potassium so it is a plasma potassium by 1 mL increments in 24th this is the only way to remove potassium from the body so pyrrectal also can be given where people can't take oral k-bind okay you can add 50 grams in 150 ml pyrrectal you can give like enema at least 30 to 60 minutes it has to stay then you can do it say 1 gram of pyrrectal decreases only 0.5 whereas orally decreases up to 1 mL increments so side effects you know GI irritation constipation if somebody has a bowel surgery or something be careful don't use too much of k-bind it can cause bowel necrosis or any bowel necrosis in post-operative it sometime then they use or disturb any bowel obstruction so treatment again I'm telling you IV calcium gluconate 10 ml IV push time frame is seconds to minutes glucose plays insulin 10 units plus 50% glucose 50 ml 100 ml so 5 to 10 minutes time frame 30 to 60 minutes is a action calcium polystyrene sulfonate you can add 15 grams or 30 grams you can give it can stay in the water if it doesn't respond any of those things then we do dialysis immediately it will come down so iponate trimia any sodium less than 135 is iponate trimia in treating iponate trimia don't go by the number go by what the patient whether the patient is censoring is normal or abnormal that's the most important criteria to treat iponate trimia to because I have to explain this I just go fast in this sorry if somebody sodium in the patient comes with sodium of 120 what to do is once you see the number don't go with the number then you you see the new logical assessment you talk to him look at how mentally is whether he's conscious oriented towards time place or person that is very very important because don't chase the number if you chase the number then you'll things can go pretty wrong always talk to the patient make sure clinically if his if his drowsy the treatment is different if is if a stable sensory means normal the treatment is absolutely different even if the number is 115 120 so somebody is number iponate trimia I think the number is around 120 I'll just give our number 120 he comes to you clinical assessment again iponate trimia is divided into you have to look at look at whether clinically is hyperolimic uolimic and ipo-olimic that's very very important again ipo-olimic you know then you can do all the test you know the spot sodium and all those things helping diagnosing but ipo-olimic you know again the colors of ipo-olimic is you know dehydration and any drugs which is causing or look for any drugs common is hydrochlorothiazide the most common cause of iponate trimia what this is people will be an hydrochlorothiazide or chlorthylidone ok a lot of people lot of reasons we get iponate trimia is number one is because a drug induced only so iponate trimia you have to look for those drugs if any drugs is there you please look into that you will have Telma IH and something CT so look for those drugs or any laxatives you know any sorry I am not laxative diuretics look for diuretics again those things are very important which can cause iponate trimia so clinically if somebody is dry try to fill again treat like any prerenal try to hydrate the patient sodium automatically will improve by giving just simple normal saline then if somebody is clinically uolimic that means no clinically is not dry neither is hyperolimic the JVP is ok everything then what happens is then then we look at clinically uolimia that is very important so you have something called a decreased DCF volume then we have a normal DCF volume then this is increased DCF volume so decreased I told you vomiting diarrhea and then is sweating too much of the link or look for any diuretic or salt-based thing normal volume you know what happens is you will have hyperthyroidism if hyperthyroidism is ruled out cortisol deficiency is ruled out the only condition is in causes assayage most common we see is assayage syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic augmentation if somebody has a tumor anywhere in the brain or lung tumor or anywhere or any inside that is anything which can cause assayage or patient of psychiatric patients or drugs any psychiatric manifestations the most common is assayage we see in clinically uolimic condition hyperolimia again congestive heart failure liver failure nephrodic syndrome all those things you know is hyperolimic so when you have a hypernatrimia again you have to look into whether it is a clinically uolimic, hyperolimic or hyperolimic based on this only we have to treat after you do a clinical examination then you go by mental status also whether it is conscious oriented if it's conscious oriented normal talking that means it is a chronic hypernatrimia don't don't jump and treat it with 3 percent saline that's very very important the other side of extra you all know I don't need to tell about it about volume depression look for sunken eyes orthostatic hypertension flattened neck veins increase heart rate decrease urinary output and decrease body weight all those things you look for in the easier volume thing if you're not able to make up clinically then about whether it's volume status then you can do investigation ways what are the other things I'm missing hyperolimia it will be you more concentration you will have increased albumin burn creatinine ratio is more than 20 to 1 or elevated bicarbonate these are all in hyperolimia if you clinically 90 percent you can easily make out clinically still you can't make out then these are the differential things uolimia make sure uric acid is less than 5 in SIDH burn creatinine ratio will be less than 10 is to 1 bicarbonate will be slightly increasing and anion graph will be low in hyperolimia indirectly is emodulation you know the emodulation happens low albumin burn creatinine more than 20 is to 1 and elevated bicarbonate these are all only the test to make out clinically if you're not able to make out the volume status. So how do you treat hyponitrimia acute look for duration what is the somebody's sodium is 142 days ago and suddenly it is 120 that is acute acute hyponitrimia don't wait for anything is any acute we have to act immediately okay there are there are a lot of symptoms like nausea, vomiting, headache, hiccups, mental change, confusion, chronic you know even the number is 110, 105 also a lot of people will have chronically asymptomatic neurologically will be because the brain would have adapted well so chronically you do not have any symptoms. So go by thing I told you moderately severe nausea without vomiting, confusion, headache and severe you'll have vomiting even seizures, patient can if you don't treat them they can go coma. So again how do you treat them any acute hyponitrimia you think if somebody's sodium is 120 so so you send basic at least you send uric acid, urine spot sodium very important don't start any fluid without sending a urine spot sodium at least and uric acid is very very important because you know it helps us a lot once you start the treatment there's no point doing any of those tests. So what is the thumb rule to give 3% saline lot of people I see admitted in other departments you know they give you know sodium is 115 or 150 they give 5 ml of 3% saline or 10 ml per hour that is wrong. So if somebody at least I tell you how exactly you do it somebody's sodium is 120 is having little bit you know drowsy or something you don't need to at least you go by even 1 ml per kg body we can give you can give up to if somebody is 60 kg you can give up to 50 to 60 ml per hour for 2, 3 hours or 4, 5 hours then again repeat sodium don't wait for sodium doing once in 24 hours. So hyponitrimia is very very important the way you correct it but don't correct more than 10, 8 to 12, 10 to 12 millicubates in 24 hours like somebody is 115 make sure you correct rapidly means at least around 8 to 10 minutes at least by 125 to 127 you can correct in 24 hours that should be the target but don't give just 3, 5 ml per hour or 10 ml per hour or 15 ml in that way you are not sure confident about it at least start 30 ml or in a 70 kg old man you start 30 ml or 40 ml per hour but make sure you repeat every 6 hours you know the value and then you continue it otherwise just don't put on 30 ml 24 hours don't sleep on that. So if you have difficulty otherwise there is lot of formulas I don't want to tell you all the formulas because there is lot of formulas to treat hyponitrimia but at least what I tell you is at least if somebody sodium is 120 and it's acute hyponitrimia if you want to start 3 percent saline start 30 or 40 ml per hour in a elderly 70 year 70 but every after 6 hours again repeat it get the report in 1 hour again the sodium is less again you continue doing it but unless you do that don't start like that otherwise use formulas properly and then you have to treat properly but just giving 5 ml or 10 ml you know this is a common mistake we see everywhere it's not going to anywhere because in acute hyponitrimia we have treated even if 50 to 60 75 ml per hour for couple hours then we come back slowly that is how we have to treat there is a then also you can use lasix along with hypotonic saline because sodium low doesn't mean that the only the sodium is less there will be lot of water so it's basically the problem with the water so we have to excrete the water to excrete the water we have to give diuretic so lasix helps then 3 percent saline also helps along with that


ya wu dismiss un employee without notice, without even a single pay. Watch this video until Hi guys, welcome back to this channel. If you are new here to this channel, consider subscribing. Support this channel by subscribing to this channel. It's the only way we can apprehend herself, develop herself in any way or the other. Remember, when we are talking about security jobs, we are talking about cleaner jobs, we are talking about technician jobs in Qatar. It is now the final destination for all people looking for jobs. Why? Because the FIFA World Cup Qatar, there are very many opportunities around the globe. There are very many opportunities on the platform for the security guns, for the cleaners, for the technicians and all different people in their speciality at this time. And remember at this time that Qatar is one of the Gulf countries that is not yet very strict with the requirements for someone to come and work. The only thing is that you need to have what you call a sponsor. You need to have someone that is going to sponsor your work visa and the rest of the things, rest assured that will be just on a plata or silver plate that you will enjoy at a given period of time.  You know the first time you are too much excited, you're excited, I'm going out and it's the great opportunity to have it. Especially when you have a visa, you have a work visa given to you and you are among that person or among those people that are being selected out of the very many to come and work in this country. It's a very good privilege at one time, it's a privilege to have it. But remember, when we are talking about such kind of privileges at one moment of time, there's a lot of things that we need to consider. But because of the excitement that we have at NAS as a first time and the conditions we are in, we are so aggressive to move. We never have to know some of these important things, especially when we reach to these countries. In today's video, I want to share with you some of very important information that you should know, some information that we should share with our brothers and sisters in anywhere with you. Those are planning to come, those are already inside the country, those are inside this country and those are planning to come or those that have been or are waiting for their visas right now proposes out to come. This is an information to share. What am I talking about? You to avoid disappointment, you to avoid being in what you call unorganisted, you to avoid regretting that I wish. No, if all wishes were forces, then what would happen? But remember, what I'm talking about is when you come to this Gulf country, when you come to Qatar, what are you supposed to know? What did you expect? I've always talked about that in the videos, but what is something very important that you did not know that can happen abruptly without your knowledge and there's no you can do without, you can do that because it is stipulated in what we call the labor law or it is stipulated in the law that governs the labor market and it's a privilege that is given to your employer, the person who issues you a work visa. This goes to especially the new people that are coming, people who have not yet finished the probation period or people who have not even completed even a full year of service with that employer. Remember what we talked about? That employer injects in a visa for you, he injects in a ticket for you, so he expects to get that money out of you past what we call the probation period because you do the bed because you do everything he pays up by himself or herself. So meaning that you have what you call a misconduct in any way with the other or being terminated in any way with the other before even you finish up, even you serve before even you serve a service of one full year, it is really lost to him. What am I talking about? Did you know that in the Katali Balu there is an article 61 which is a very important article that everyone should know. What are we talking about? We are talking about article 61 of the Katali Balu. What does the article 61 of the Katali Balu say? The article says that in any instance or in any situation your employer can dismiss an employee without notice and without a pay. What am I talking about? Article 61 regulates the disciplinary dismiss without pay. It provides a closed list of scenarios in which the employer will be justified to dismiss the work without a single notice or without even a single pay at a moment of time. What are we talking about? That these articles entitles the article 61 of the Balu entitles the employer to dismiss to terminate an employee or to terminate an employment contract with a worker without notice or even payment of end of service gratitude. Even in case the employee commits an act of gross misconduct, hope I'm very clear with you that in that article, article 61 of the Balu that you've not looked at or you've never taken time to look at your employer can terminate you without payment, without even refund, not even gross payment salary is being paid to you at a time. So what am I saying? That most of us we should be very careful especially people that have not gone what you call beyond the probationary period. If you've been issued a work visa and you're working with that company or that employer, you should be very careful until you finish a one year service with that person because he has a right under the article of the Balu he has a right to dismiss you without even a single pay at one moment of time. This is where our brothers and sisters are falling in trouble especially the newcomers being taken up by the power to call the effect of others the bandwagon effect of others not knowing the reason why you're here not knowing the reason why you came from your country not knowing that the person who gave you the work visa who injected you the work visa has put a lot of money in you and he expects to get that money out of you out of you he expects you to work for him at least for a period of one year you begin the misconduct before even you finish the probationary period dear brothers and sisters in all categories yoga you may be a security guard you may be a cleaner until you will be dismissed and will be taken back to your country of origin because by the law this person is mandated is given that authority to terminate you is given that authority to dismiss you up so oeith of the two misses oeith of the two losing you get to lose the job you get to lose the opportunity and getting that opportunity again it may be a little bit very hard in one or the other so i just call upon all our new brothers and sisters especially if you come into this kind of countries if you come into kata i know there are a lot of opportunities are coming out grow there's a lot of opportunities are here we have the world cup there will be a lot of things there are a lot of recruitment companies out there a lot of recruitment work recruitment agencies out there recruiting very many numbers of people in the hospital it is security departments cleaning departments you know technician departments facility in all categories they may be recruited you must be a little bit very careful if you want to finish up sometime living in this small state country in this girl country especially kata sell it to be treated it is what we call it is just a combined factors that you need to put in place perseverance obedience are knowing what you need or what you want as a person so it's quite very very important from the start before you go into something you first need to find out what is the abstract effect in case this happens and you should be prepared to face whatever it is thank you so much for coming back to this channel and thanks so much for subscribing to this channel by the way feel free to drop a comment in a comment section feel free to share to friends let other people know about this important information let's grow by supporting this channel by subscribing don't forget it's makes from the next creation see you again in the next video


You look at Roku, again, had a really, really big one. Look how close this thing. This thing starts confirming, right? This thing starts confirming the low from three days ago. Look at that. Welcome to Access to Trader, the number one community for those who are committed to taking control of their trading in order to achieve success, profitability, and longevity. Thank you for joining us. Here's Dan Shapiro to help you find your edge, master your process, and own your future. Hey, guys, good evening, everybody. Welcome to another edition of the Access to Trader.com Nightly Wrap-Up Show. Hope everybody is doing well. Usually, I would take Thursday nights off. I actually took it yesterday. I was so exhausted. There was so much good value yesterday. Everything was going nuts, right? The game stops of the world was going nuts. The AMCs of the world were going nuts. Diamond hands, paper planes, everything in between. Tesla had a huge run yesterday. There was just so much stuff going on, but let's forget about that, right? There's nothing to do with that. If you guys remember three, four days ago, actually five days ago, excuse me, we had a really aggressive channel here that the cues broke. And the cues broke them pretty hard and had a two big day decline. Very, very ugly. We saw Tesla go from like 800 to 619. We saw like a 200 point move, 200, 300 point move in Amazon. And everything got smoked, like really, really aggressively. And the market got saved two days ago when the cues reclaimed the 50 day moving average, leading to a pretty aggressive rally yesterday. I think we talked about that. I think everybody really understood the importance of a hammer reclaiming the 50 day moving average. So we got our spike right back into the five day moving average. And if you are just starting out as a chartist or you're interested in technical analysis, for me, just for me personally, I'm one of the very few people who use the five day moving average just because for me, it demonstrates the shortest term, sentiment possible. If you watch, watching this broadcast is very, very first time. It's for, I believe it's one of the most underutilized data collection areas that people use. Very few people use the five day, but I do. And you can see here, every single time the cues touch the five day moving average over the last two weeks, they got sold. They touched them, they got sold. They touched them, they got sold. And today they touched them again and they got sold. And I think what we started talking about three, four days ago was the obvious buyer strike. We saw it everywhere. Stocks got really beat up. And if you go do your homework, and I always emphasize that every single trader really should spend at least, I mean, at a bear's minimum, a half an hour to 45 minutes looking at charts in the middle of after the work, right? Just kind of give yourself an opinion to collect some data to formulate a thought process going into the next day. And on the weekends, you're trying to do a lot more thorough research. Start looking at the Russell, members of the Russell, of the cues, of the spies, the financial, whatever the case may be. You wanna kind of get a broad search and broad scope of what's going on in the market. But for the middle of the week, just to kind of formulate an opinion, you have to take off the blinders. And I understand there's a lot of euphoria that came back in the last few days, you know, with the big run on AMC, big, big move, you had a big, big move in GameStop, just absolutely nuts. And the craziest part about GameStop yesterday was, if you guys remember, I was actually long GameStop yesterday. I completely messed it up, made no money on it, like literally no money on it. And a lot of my friends, and I had a conversation with a buddy of mine, I shared in the live webinar, if you guys remember on GameStop yesterday, once it started building over the $49 level, it went like sideways underneath the pivot, about a dollar, dollar and a half underneath the pivot for about five hours. In the last 30 minutes, it ran up 150 points. Crazy, right? So it led to day two. And I think a lot of people, you know, started chasing it up again, the euphoria kicked in. And again, I am guilty of that as well. We actually gave a pivot and we'll get to the pivots in a second, all above $150 of all places. But again, there was a technical reason for that and the stock spiked up about 30 points. But this was the first time that nobody could really turn around and say, look, retail is chasing it up. There was a different game being played here. And you could see, and I tweeted out on my regular Twitter account, if you go through the feed, you'll see, there were buyers coming in for tomorrow, right? Literally for tomorrow's session, tomorrow's expiration, the 200 and the 300 weeklies. There were guys putting up a million, million and a half dollar worth of premium for the March 19 call. So there was a reason for the pivot that I put in. And again, we'll talk about that in a second. But I think the euphoria was so concentrated on those two names that people missed the big picture. And the overall market, when you look at the testers of the world, right? When you look at the testers of the world and saw exactly what happened. Again, we've been talking about this 800 pivot and then this 780 pivot and then this pivot right here below 710. And today we talked about the 694 pivot. I think the stock goes lower tomorrow as well. But the most important part is I think a lot of people really missed the big picture that there has been a buyer strike, especially in big cap technology. And although there was kind of a rotation, for example, into the financial names, right?  So when you look at the whole dynamics of the market, and again, we're gonna kind of look at the cues as a barometer. And the cues now have closed one, two, three, four, five, six consecutive sessions underneath the five-day moving average. Again, short-term sell signal, but this was the most important part. We closed the first time below the 50-day moving average, and that's a big deal. And again, if you believe in the theory that stocks trade from supply to supply to demand to demand, you have to start watching this 211, a 311 level tomorrow on the cues. Now, why is that important? Well, that was the hammer that was put in that the market reclaimed the 50-day moving average just two days ago. So if we start losing this 311 level, you guys remember, if all you guys have been watching this broadcast for a very long time, do you remember the big number I've been talking about for a very, very long time in nausea, right? 305, you guys remember, 305, 305, stick it on your forehead, put it on a sticky pad, that's the magic number. If we start losing the 311 here on the cues tomorrow, then we go down to the 305. Now, if this thing confirms on Monday, I'm not saying it will, I'm not trying to spread fear, I'm not a fear monger, we trade both sides of the market, we're realistic, okay? I'm not a bull, I'm not a bear, I'm a realist, I'm an opportunist. I try to gather as much data as possible to put myself in a situation to try to win the next day. And if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Again, it's not a game of being right, okay? If you're in the game of being right or getting likes or getting shares or getting thumbs up, thumbs down, the crap it's called, you're in the wrong business, okay? This is a very, very aggressive business if you're wrong. The best thing we can do is formulate an opinion. So if you look at a whole bunch of stocks tonight, and again, I encourage everybody to do so, you'll notice one common denominator. They're very, very close to knocking down bottom channels, maybe not macro just yet, because again, the rising 60 minute and the rising daily trend line still continues to be this 305 on a close, but when you start looking at many names, and again, you could go through a whole bunch of them, some names that we've got to watch, right? Like a TDOC, 50 day moving average. Why is the importance mirroring the cues, right? TDOC, when you look at Facebook, look at this range on Facebook. Look how many times it held this level, one, two, three, four. This Facebook starts getting below this level here. This thing has room all the way down to the January lows. Again, big spot. If you start looking at Apple, right? Apple had a big, big online three days ago, and we had this kind of like the big tech rep. If Apple starts reclaiming this bottom channel here, look how much room it has to go. Again, we saw some really big aggressive near-term put buyers in this thing, the 110s, the 100s, the money is being put down, the bets are being laid on the sell side of the market. Again, doesn't mean it's going to happen, but everybody has an opinion, everybody has their own thought process, everybody has their own technical way to kind of navigate the waters. At least you know where the money flow is going. You look at Roku, again, had a really, really big run. Look how close this thing, this thing starts confirming, right? This thing starts confirming the low from three days ago. Look how much room this thing has, right? A lot of room down. Look at Tesla, and again, I don't think it's gonna, you know, maybe test the 619 level that it put in a couple of days ago, but if it starts confirming today's prices, then well, then you have a test coming on the 1619 level, and if this area gets confirmed, look how much room potentially you have as well. So we're set up for tomorrow, and I've been joking around now for four years, and if you've been watching this broadcast, you kind of know what I'm about to say. Every single time I'm sell buys, and again, I've went through a bunch of charts tonight, that there's no way I can convince myself to say, hey Dan, the market's gonna run tomorrow, but there's a running joke, right? And every single time I'm 100% sell buys, 900% sell buys, 2,419% sell buys, what does the market do? The market gaps are 500 points, and we go to all-time highs. Okay, right? Maybe this time is different. Again, it's not about being right, it's about being prepared. We just wanna make sure that if the market opens up flat or up a little bit, or even down a little bit, and these ranges are still intact, and they're still in the crosshairs of being confirmed, then and only then are we gonna lay down our bets. If you're in the business of anticipating a move, you're gonna get murdered, especially ask any long-running short for the last four years, five years, what they've been doing, and what they've been thinking every single time there's potential damage in the market, and miraculously, the market gaps up the next day 500 points. Like I said, maybe this time is different. So the moral of the story is I'm prepared, okay? I'm not kind of trying to trick myself or outsmart myself, I'm looking at beta. I'm looking at Amazon, and Facebook, and Apple, and Tesla, and NVIDIA, right? NVIDIA had a quarter, they sold the stock off on the quarter. It stopped that support. It's not a lot of thought behind it. This thing starts confirming taste price action. Well, then it's gonna test this whole channel here. This whole channel breaks, look how much room you have down. So my buy is today, is to the sell side for tomorrow. Is the market gonna gap down 500 points and my whole watch list is me burnt the hell in a hand basket? Then yeah, then what can I do? But at least I am prepared. At least I do have an opinion. And the most important part is until that opinion turns into a confirmation channel, there is no trader. What's the worst case scenario tomorrow, right? The market gaps up, traps shorts, never takes out today's ranges and what we're looking at to the upside? Really, is that really our worst case scenario? So like I've been saying for years and years and years, it's okay to be wrong, right? It's okay, I'm wrong every single day in my opinion. It's okay to be wrong in your opinion. As long as you're not stubborn and you're hard headed and immuble to paint yourself in a corner in a bias and start putting on positions in anticipation of what you think is gonna happen. Let it happen, right? We're not smart enough. We know we're all idiots. We're not smart enough to figure out what happens next. We have an idea what happens next. We have an opinion of what happens next. But until it happens next, it's just a setup, not a trade. So very, very important to understand that.  And I say this all the time. I think a lot of people confuse volatility with average true range. And again, if you trade beta, like I trade beta, these are the biggest ranges in the market. You know, Tesla's and Netflix's and Facebook's on and on and on. These are the stocks with the biggest, widest ranges. So when people talk about volatility, the market up 500, the market down 500, the market up 500, the market down 500, the market structure breaks down. You don't wanna see the market structure break down. You wanna see stocks with the biggest ranges continue their flow of orderly, organic order flow. Once you start seeing up, down, up, down, up, down, number one, the liquidity goes away. The spreads get wider, less participation in the names, and you can't act with any type of conviction because one uptick with the future and one downtick in the future, is you're going to be upside down and you trade. So I think a lot of, especially new traders have, they love the idea of volatility until things get volatile. Then all of a sudden you're talking about, well, if cash is a position, let's sit on our hands. No, cash is a position is not a position. A position is a position. If you wanna be flat, that's okay. And that's okay because that's a very proactive, mature thing to do. But the idea of volatility compared to an average true range is like comparing apples to hand grenades, completely two different conversations. So tomorrow, I am definitely sell bias. I am praying to the market gods that they can hear me, please gap up the market or at least open the market flat. I'd really appreciate it because at least at that point, we have a shot for these ranges to confirm. And if they do, well, we'll see what happens there. Other than that, let's talk about the day. Not many, but there were very, very value ones. So let's talk about this. Netflix, I like to the upside. Never even came close to confirming. AMTX did okay. If all you guys who took AMTX, 980 needs to build. Here was AMTX, right? Took out the 980, traded all the way up to 1065 before obviously the market sold it off. I still like this thing, set alert on it. I don't know if it's gonna get there in the next few days, maybe next week. But if this thing starts confirming 11, maybe it goes higher. Again, assuming the market doesn't fall off a cliff, Paycheck's never got to the 94 level, traded like 9380. It really needed to confirm the whole number. FSR, I scalped this thing, that was my first trade of the day. Very, very quick scalp, ahead of earnings, 2380, 24 needs to build and I said cash flow spike only. I thought it reported today. I have to have to check. If it did report, I apologize. But anyway, here was FSR, here was FSR. It took out that 24 dollar level. What are actually as high as the 2480? As you can see, it reversed pretty aggressively. So it didn't report. Maybe I got my days wrong. But anyway, here's kinda, it could have been a good day. It could have been a really good trade. Twitter, I put in, I go, 75 it needs to build. And I go, nevermind, it just exploded. I was literally typing the pivot. Some filing came out and Twitter this morning went up almost like 7980, really, really big move. Billy, 139 rejected three times on the 60 minute needs to reclaim earnings beat. And here was Billy, right? Here was Billy. Here was the 139, I was told, I see these two candles right here, right? 138, 83, 138, 88. So once it took out that 139, really, really big spike. Congratulations for all you guys who did take it. Went to oldest the 147 level. Boeing never got to the 229, 82, 30 level. That costs a nice little chart there. 340 needs to build, again, not a big move, especially in this market, but it still looks good. Took out the 340 trade in the 350s, still looks good. Actually closed the day green, so that one still looks pretty good. Nice little push there. AMTX take on the way up, FSR make some sales. All right, here's the trade I lost my life. When I mean that, I don't mean that financially. I mean literally as I was in the trade. So we started watching GameStop, and I put this into the channel, like, look, experienced traders only, I can't believe I'm even typing this, but 152 is the fifth 60 minutes supply, it needs to build, right? And that's when we started watching buyers come in with some size, by the way, for the 200 and 300 weeklies. And here was the pivot, right? And this is when you know something is not for you. So here's the pivot, right? You see this 152 level right here, right? Right over here, it put him to high around 10 o'clock at 152. So I knew this was supply, right? So we get along this thing. We get along this thing, I had a buy stop, by the way. I had a buy stop, and kids don't try this at home. I went downstairs for lunch, and I checked my phone, I saw it got triggered. Then I started thinking all these crazy thoughts in my head, oh my God, what happens if it gets halted, maybe it doesn't open up again, maybe it goes to 20, and I freak out, like I freak out. And I started running up the stairs, and everybody in the live webinar started laughing at me because you hear me running up the stairs, like I'm about to have a heart attack. So I make some sales, right? I make some sales, and I say that as I'm in the trade and as the stock is going higher, I go, I don't wanna be in this thing, okay? I know my limits, I'm man enough to admit it, I am adult enough to admit it, I am comfortable in my own, and I would rather trade Tesla with full size, blindfolded, right? Amazon blindfolded, then trade this thing. So I sold it, I sold it, people were laughing at me, I sold it, and yada yada yada goes up another 25 points. So if you did take it, congratulations. It's just not for me, it's just really not for me. And the most important part, the most important part, I see why people say this is game, this is crazy. This is absolute crazy. Even technically, when you're in the trade and it's going for you and you think of yourself, I don't wanna be in the trade, that's your first clue, don't be in the trade. So guys, have a great, great night. Stay patient, stay patient with your career, trust technical analysis, put in the work, believe in God, the most important part is stay in business. Guys, I love you all, God bless, I'll see you all tomorrow.


Administrative division, an administrative division, unit, entity, area or region, also referred to as a subnational entity, statoid citation needed, constituent unit, or country subdivision, is a portion of a country or other region delineated for the purpose of administration. Administrative divisions are granted the certain degree of autonomy and are usually required to manage themselves through their own local governments. Countries are divided up into these smaller units to make managing their land and the affairs of their people easier. A country may be divided into provinces, which, in turn, are divided into counties, which, in turn, may be divided in whole or in part into municipalities. Administrative divisions are conceptually separate from dependent territories, with the former being an integral part of the state and the other being only under some lesser form of control. However, the term administrative division can include dependent territories as well as accepted administrative divisions for example, in geographical databases. For clarity and convenience the standard neutral reference for the largest administrative subdivision of a country is called the first level administrative division or first administrative level. Smaller is called second level administrative division or second administrative level.


Hello everyone, very nice to be here today, even though not physically. My name is Jo Av and I'm from Aerobotics Company. At Aerobotics we use drone technology and models to provide information about the performance of your crop, the information that you provide is to the tree level or to the vine level. All the tools available for any tree crop as well as vineyards. And basically the idea is to fly your orchard to get to those maps, those reports, to take action based on those reports and then to reflight to measure the changes over time. The entire process is very easy. We use, we work with local drone pilots, they come to the property, they fly the orchards, we get the data on the cloud, we analyze the data. We identify variation and risks in your orchards and I come to your farm, we sit together, we go through this very detailed report which includes what we identified, quantified, how many trees in each block are underperforming, how many trees are suffering from water stress, etc. And we provide recommendations on how to fix, how to rectify those issues. Once this has been done, we reflight those blocks to measure the changes over time and to make sure that we are on the right track. And the entire idea is obviously to optimize yield and to reduce variation on a block level. We're not here to create a beautiful map for you to put in your office, but rather to really help you to drive and take actions based on the insights that we identify. Again, don't have heaps of time today, so I'll only show you a few examples of maps that we provide. The first one is a high resolution RGB visual of your orchard, which we then use to provide the tree sensors for each and every block of your orchard so you know how many trees you have, how many are missing and that could be exported into a really nice report per variety as well. The next one is using a multi-spectral sensor. We provide tree health map so that you know what areas in each block are underperforming. Also, there is a tool that allows you to quantify how many trees are affected by this trend issue, how many trees are suffering from phytophthora and so forth. And the last one, the last thing that I will touch on today, which I want to focus a little bit more is the water stress analysis. Basically, when the drone flies, we measure the temperature of each and every canopy in your orchard. We then apply a few models to calibrate that based on the ambient temperature and based on the actual size of each and every canopy to provide you this colorful map as you see here on the right-hand side, whereby a blue dot represents a tree that transpires well. So photosynthesis transpires well and orange and yellow trees are trees that are a bit stressed in terms of irrigation. I will now jump into the platform and for the last minute or 90 seconds that I have, I will show you a few examples from one example from the platform specifically on the irrigation side of things. So this is a citrus orchard, northern hemisphere. This is a naval block. We've mapped this orchard quite late in the season in late April. This is the visual, the RGB. It looks fairly uniform. It looks a bit like they're here, but nothing too drastic and the grower wasn't aware of any issue. Then we applied our models and the transpiration product provided us the following image and you can definitely see that the midsection transpires well. So trees are in a good water status compared to the western valve and the eastern valve, which was the most severe water stress as can be seen here and you can see the distribution as well. So what we did here, long story short, was to recommend the grower to flush clean the drippers. He did so three times and he also adjusted the pressure in this valve in the eastern section. Then we mapped this block twice and I'm jumping to the last mapping from late August. Sorry, it's loading, but you can basically see that the variation shrinks. It's quite hard to see when we look at one map, but if you look at it side by side, you can see that the variation shrinks, you can see here on the distribution and also you see that more trees are blue and less orange. This block has been picked already and there was 10 tons to the hectare difference between this valve and to this valve. So I think that comes to show the value of this product and how important it is to measure this irrigation uniformity distribution early in the season as early as possible to remediate those kinds of risks and anomaly. We are now very busy doing those mapping as an irrigation-ordered product in your area as well, citrus, almond and vineyards. So if you find this of interest, feel free to reach out to me and we can discuss further. Thank you very much.