Rydym ni'n gud o'r carti gynon ni'n llawer o'r gweithio'r corwcon, o bwysigio'n gwybod meddwl. Mae'n ffocchi'n gwybod a'ch wneud o bwysigio'n llunio'r llunio, mae'n gwybod i esech yn gofio ifanc a ddai'n gwybod i'r espai. Mae'n gwybod i'r ffocogi, maent mae'n gwybod i lawr o bros, yn ddau'n meddwl gyfyrdd. Mae bwysigio'n gwybod i'r grannio'n meddwl, mae'r crannag, mae'r bobl yno, felly rhaid o'r gy 들, Blackhwn yn eu bod yn eu cyfrannau a'r cyllidol i gennych a'n gweithio'n cyfrannu, a gweld eich bod yn eich gloedd o'r cyfrannu, maen nhw'n gwybod y cwrdd eich cyfrannu, mae'n gwybod eich gweithio'n gweithio. Rwy'n gweithio, mae'n gweithio eich gweithio a'n gweithio eich gweithio. Rwy'n gweithio'r cael eu llunar, Yn gyfrannu yn y gyfrannu, wybod rwy'n gweithio. five seconds one two three four did he get through one zero change places the first game was a five second catch game really the guy's got five seconds to get through the the cones the defendants got five seconds to try and tag him so all those movements multi change changes of direction relevant to defending were in those really familiar agility sessions off you go one two three four he's got through Jeepers creepers off you go one two three he's got him good defending he's nailed him and then we took it into uh we paired them up uh in terms of we we had can you we played the tight one can you lose your man can you get away from your man in this big area what i'm going to allow you to do the reds are going to be the attackers the blacks always have to be touch tight so if Billy's running round in here and I'm the black slowly I'm touch tight now you've got one chance to get out of here without me staying with you so as you're jogging round one change of direction might be here and then quickly go that way one change of direction I'm allowing can you get outside the area and lose him so slow the defender down but I'm going to call out and inside 20 seconds you've got to make your move now whether you make your move after five seconds 10 seconds 15 seconds is down to you and down to whether there's space to run through 20 seconds off you go if you get out keep your scores change places only one change of direction well that's not bad that's not bad you nearly stayed with him good only one change of direction allowed you've got to stay in there there's the grid now just every now and again those good defenders do just let him know you're there just let him know you're there let him know you're there and when he's ready now I'm going to allow two changes of direction so you can walk in one way then chop and go the other way be aware of the other players in here don't want any injuries okay 20 seconds off you go be aware of the other players and stop there in your camp boys in your camp what's your thoughts about that in terms of of how you lose your marker in a match do you think that's relative what about for the striker what's the striker got to be doing knowing knowing knowing I'm walking off him I'm moving him what have I created now I'm getting back across him


A fiery horse with a speed of light, a cloud of dust, and a hearty high old silver, the Lone Ranger. Whenever men gathered around the campfire, in the days when the West was young, stories were told of the masked rider of the plains. Astride his great horse, Silver, he fought crime and criminals throughout the Western United States, and no man did more to bring law and order to a lawless frontier. Now, from out of the past, come the thundering hoofbeats of Silver. The Lone Ranger rides again. As our story opens, night is falling on the trail to Jackson City. The Lone Ranger and Taddu have been riding for the greater part of the day, and are now preparing to make camp. There, horse, wait. Here, Taddu, I think it'll do. We make camp early. We get up early. They're both tired from our trip. We get good rest. This is fine here. Oh, oh, Silver. We can find plenty of wood around here for our fire. That's right. Well, it looks as though others thought this was a good capping place. Oh, there are plenty of crack here. You can see why they built their fire. Doesn't look as though they could have been gone long. Maybe four, five hours. How many men would you say were here, Kimusabe? Five, six. Probably cowboys who stopped to cook a meal. Look, look there. Cigarette stuff. No, and local weed. Local weed. That's dangerous stuff to smoke. I've seen it turn men into killers. Many bad color in you with them. Perhaps those men weren't cowboys after all. I don't know. Did you hear that horse, Kimusabe? Huh. Silver, hear him too. I wonder who's riding here. Maybe more fellow may camp here. I'd rather not answer questions about this mask. Oh, come this way, all right. There he is. And he hasn't a rider, Kimusabe. Hello, fellow. Look, he answered all right.  He acts as though he's trying to tell us something. That's not a rule, fellow. That's pretty strange. I think he wants us to go with him. We follow him? Yes, we'll get a horse and see if he leads us anywhere. That's a good idea. Silver, him and plenty big hurry. All right, old fellow. We'll follow along. Come on, Silver. Hello, he's taking us toward that woods. Did you see anything wrong, Kimusabe? What, what's that there? There's something on the ground. Looks as though it might be a man. Come on, Silver. Here we are. Hello, Silver. Hello, fellow. This man is dead. Me take look. A young fellow too. Him. Him get shot through back. Shot in the back?  Can you tell how long he's been dead, Tyler? Maybe three, four hours. That's the same time you thought those men left the place. We stopped to camp. There, there, track. Hoof, Prince. Must have been at least five or six horses here. That's right. There go him horse, follow him trail. This man was probably a member of the gang. I wonder if there's anything to identify him with. There, watch. Let me see it. There, here, watch. Thanks. There's a picture in the back. Then Kent. That must be this man's name. I want to go through his pockets. Maybe something in the show where his home was or who his folks were. You take look. There's nothing in this pocket. Wait. The letter is something in the shirt pocket. Maybe that tell you. You have it. I think we're justified in reading this letter under the circumstances, Tyler. What did it say? One moment. It seems to be from his mother. She can't read or write. No? How you know that? She says here that her foreman is writing the letter for her. Oh, what more it say? Nothing of importance, Tyler. Just news about herself. Hopes for her son's happiness. Nothing that explains his death. Oh, that heap, bad. She seems to have thought he was leading an honest life. Get shot by a bad peller. What do you say that, Kimisabi? In shot and back. Good peller, not do that. You're right. What we need to do now? I think we'll investigate this further. Perhaps we'll be able to find the murderers and learn why Dan was killed. Here, Silver, we'll examine these tracks, Tyler. You may be able to recognize them again. I don't know them. Maybe I can follow these tracks, but I'll have to hurry. Get dark and get quick now. You stay here and take care of Dan's body. Tonto, do that. Come on, Silver. Jackson City was a typical western town. It boasted little more than a main street, a group of weather-beaten homes, a café, jail, and a stagecoach office. Red Murphy was the manager of the coach line. We see him now at his desk. The door of the office opens, and a little old lady enters. Who are you? How do you miss Kent? Hello, Mr. Murphy. I just come to see about the stage. You'll sit right down. It ain't often I get to see you anymore. Oh, oh, oh.  Well, thank you. I reckon I'm getting to the age where everybody don't care much about standing on their feet no more than they have to. You weren't aiming to go no place in the stage, would you? I know. Traveling ain't for such as me. I just come to see if a package come from my boy. Which one, Miss Kent? Pete, don't frisk away or Dan that you say is mine in over in Colorado. This package was to come from Pete, Mr. Murphy. I recollect you're getting a letter from Pete the other day. That's how come I'm here? He written his letter that there'd be a package of cash for me on the next stage. Of cash? Pete's sending you all that? He's a mighty fine boy, Pete is.  I got it. Pete must be doing doing well for himself. Oh, he always was smart even when he was a young'un. Yeah, I can remember. It was Dan that was the wild one, weren't he? No, there weren't nothing wrong with Dan. Maybe he was a might reckless about choosing his friend and he was one to have a good time when there was a jet for it. But he set her down now, all right. Well, I'm glad to hear it. But ain't there no package, Mr. Murphy? Sure, she needn't go to worry, Miss Kent. The stage just ain't come in yet. You see, there's been a heap of trouble on the trail lately. There's been landslides, and the bridge went out over to Willow Creek and all kinds of things. The stage ain't come in on time for the past week. But have you any notion when it'll be here? Don't, I'm sorry, but I can't say it's to that, neither. Maybe it won't show up to tomorrow sometime. Oh, then I don't reckon there's much use in me waiting any longer. Yeah, riding back to your place, are you? It's a mighty long ride for a body like me, but I might just as well. Now, why don't you stay over to my place? The Mrs. would be glad to put you up. No, I think I'd better be getting back. Well, suit yourself, Miss Kent. You'll look out for my package, won't you? I sure will. Thank you. And if I don't get in for it tomorrow, you will hold it till I do. I'll watch it like it was my own. Goodbye, ma'am. Good day. There goes one of the finest old ladies they ever seen. She's dead to begin with, but she's got more spunk than a dozen men. Red Murphy. Huh! Gotti, where'd you come from? I came in the back door.   Honest terrain. I'm not a thief. I'm here to ask you some questions. Is that all you want? It is. Was that old lady who just left here, Mrs. Kent? Yeah, that was her. I thought it was. I went to her home and found she'd come here. You ain't planning to harm her, none are you, stranger. You wouldn't do that, would you?  She has a son named Dan? Yes, but I... Does she know where he is? What business is that of yours, mister? I ain't... Answer me. Well, I... I reckon she does. She sent him a letter by my stage up Denver Way once. That was quite a spell ago. He's supposed to be mining. Yes, I saw that letter. Mister, don't do nothing to hurt Miss Kent. She's old and feeble. Do you like her? Well, I should say I do. They don't come no finer. What would you do to keep her from being harmed? Well, I ain't just like the other folks around here that know her. I do most anything. Red, her son Dan is dead. Dead, you say? Yes. And the men who killed him are right here in this district. How come you know that? Red, I want to know this. Does Mrs. Kent own anything of value? Anything that outlaws would want to steal? There's nothing that I know of. Are you sure? I ought to be sure. Even the cattle she owns ain't worth the steal. I told her she ain't got nothing. What's that? Well, he gotta eat what we the stage. I'm trying to miss Kent just, mister. She was looking for the stage? I ain't got the time to talk to you now, stranger. I got to see to the stage. But you stay on. There's things I want to ask you. I'll wait for you. Early this trip. Yeah, but it would run this time. Here, take this package. It's from Miss Kent. Throw it down. There you are. And check it this inside.  I'd be out to help you. Sure, Red. Golly, I forgot you were still here. What's in that package from Mrs. Kent? Hey, uh, I don't know. Don't lie to me, Red. But I... It may be important. Well, I'll tell you what it is. It's cash, that's what. And stranger, the fella that tries to take it away from me is gonna get shot full of lead. That's exactly what I wanted to know. I'll leave the way I came in. But hold on! I wonder where he's going. I shouldn't have never left his back door open. Hey, wait! His horse slither. And I was wondering if he was straight or not. Well, I should smile. The curtain falls on the first act of our thrilling Lone Ranger drama. Before the next exciting scenes, please permit us to pause for just a few moments. Now to continue the story. The Lone Ranger and Tonto, stopping to make camp near Jackson City, were met by a riderless horse that led them to the body of Dan Kent, who had been shot in the back. The masked man and his companion followed the tracks of the killers to the Kent Ranch. Then the Lone Ranger rode to town where he learned that a package of money had just arrived for Mrs. Kent by the stage. As our second act opens, we see the masked man reigning in his great horse at the camp he shares with Tonto. Tonto! Get back soon. I think I've learned why outlaws rode to the Kent Ranch. Why that? Mrs. Kent is expecting money from another son. Oh, outlaw know about Kent. I'm not sure, but I believe I know the answer. Kent woman knows son, Dan, outlaw... I don't think so. And we won't let her find it out unless we have to. There are still things we have to do before we can catch the outlaws. Isn't that right? I want you to find the sheriff and his deputies. Don't tell them anything, but learn where to locate them if we need them in a hurry. Tonto, do that. We must be sure to be ready for whatever happens. It had been a long, hard drive from Mrs. Kent from town to her home. And when she arrived there, she was surprised to see a number of horses standing outside the house. She climbed down from the buckboard, and when her foreman, Clem, came up to lead the horse away, she asked him about the visitors. Clem, who's the folks come to see me? Joseph Jensen aims to speak to you. You get that package off the stage, ma'am. The stage is late, so I didn't wait for it. Are they strangers, Clem? Uh-huh. The folks in the house. Oh, them. Well, ma'am, maybe they're strangers to you, but they ain't to me. I wonder what they want. You'll find out soon enough, I reckon. I haven't a notion why anybody'd be calling on me. They won't be backward about telling you. Oh, what are you coming in for, Clem? Thought you was gonna stable my horse. I got some things to say to you, too. There she is, boys. They've been waiting for you, ma'am. Yes. This is Duke Reaver's, Miss Kent. He'll do all the talking for us. What talking? You went to town for a right important package, didn't you, Miss Kent? Oh, was that to you? You'd be surprised. He didn't fetch it back with her, Duke. The stage wasn't in yet. Clem, did you tell these fellers about that package? Sure I did. We know all about that cash, Miss Kent. It won't do you no good to lie about it. You mean... We mean we want it, we're gonna have it. Clem, they aimin' to rob me. Well, and what of it? And... and you're in with them. Of course I am. How else do you think they'd know enough to come here? To think you'd do a thing like this to me. Talking won't help. I paid you good money, and now you turn on me. I ain't interested in hearing about that. All we want is a cash. Well, it won't do you no good. I'll never bring it with me. So, Clem said. And you won't be able to get it. You think not? I know you won't. Red Murphy'll keep it when it gets here. And he won't give it up to nobody but me. There's ways of gettin' around that.  Clem, you hold the gun on her. I'll do that. Hold the gun on a woman. You won't get hurt unless you go against orders. Now, sit down over here, Miss Kent. There's a pen and paper. Clem's already read out what we want. You just put your mark on it. What does paper say? Never mind about that. You just sign it. And the rest, you can leave to me. Mrs. Kent, helpless in the hands of the outlaws, signed the paper written by her foreman and gave it to Duke. We immediately left the house, mounted and rode for town. Get along, man. Get along. Come on. Get along, man. Come on. Get along. The Lone Ranger, riding toward the Kent Place, saw Duke racing by and pulled Silver to a stop. Oh, oh, Silver. Oh, boy. Silver. That fellow came from the Kent Ranch. And he's heading for town. He's one of the outlaws. We may be too late. I want to see the hoof prints of his horse. Silver. He is one of them. Totto and I followed that same track before. We've got to get back to town and find Totto right away. Yep. All right, old fellow. We'll have to hurry. In the meantime, Duke continued on into town. There, with a signed paper in his hand, he halted before the stage office, dismounted and strode inside. Red Murphy looked up in surprise at the sound of the door. You the manager here? Uh-huh. What can I do for you? Read this here now. It'll tell all it needs to be told. Yeah. Give it here. Ah. This says Miss Kent wants me to give you the package that was to come address to her. And what it says? I didn't know nothing about it. She just handed it to me and told me to ride here with it. Uh-huh. The stage coming yet? Oh, it's been here all right. Where's the package on it? Yeah, it's here. And give it to me if that's what the note said. I got to be getting back. I don't know about that. Huh? I sort of figured she'd be coming after it herself. She was here once, wasn't she? Didn't she have the whole trip for nothing? Yeah, I know. Then what's trouble in you? Well, I don't savvy why she sent back so soon. She told me she'd be in tomorrow. Maybe it's something she wants real bad. It's that, sure enough. But I don't know. I'll last it, hand it over, and be done with it. Just who are you anyhow? You work for Miss Kent? Of course I do. I wouldn't be here if I didn't, would I? It's a powerful, important package. I can take care of it. Uh-huh. And for all I know, maybe you take care of it to turn well. Say, just what are you hidden? Oh, nothing. Nothing. I would just sort of think in our lousy. Now, Gunnett, what do you want that old woman to do? Ride all that way back to town just because you're too stubborn to do like she asks? I got another idea. Yeah? There ain't nothing much doing here now. Maybe I could spare the time to run out there with this myself. Why is that? There ain't no need of that. Oh, shucks. It won't be no trouble. I'll just... Frank, let this man take the package. I'm here, fella. You here again? Give him the package. It'll be dark before he gets to the ranch now. Why should I do what you say? I think you will. Now wait. There ain't no reason to get your hands so blamed close to them six guns. Take the package, dude. Yeah. Take it to Mrs. Kent. She sent you for it. There's no reason she shouldn't get it. Tom Gollage, you shouldn't have butted in like this.  The mayor's killer's got more sense than you ever is. I hope everything's all right. There's something darn funny about this. And all the time I figured you were straight, despite your mask. You'll have to trust me, Red. But all that cash. Mrs. Kent needs it so bad. And if it don't get to her... Mrs. Kent will get her money. But that fella looked like a crook to me. He is a crook. Then look, he'll like... I'll take that note he brought with him. No, wait. I'm going now, Red. Mrs. Kent and her money are safe. The rest of the band of outlaws had made themselves comfortable in Mrs. Kent's home while they awaited the return of their leader. Mrs. Kent tried to face them bravely. And as a last resort, she attempted an appeal to the treacherous foreman. Clem, haven't you no decency at all? Can't you see the wickedness of what you're doing? Keep still, won't you? The only reason I want that cash is so that I won't lose my place.  And if they ain't paid everything I got, they'll be took away from me. Jerks, you ain't got a long to live anyhow. The cash is worth a heap more at us, fella, than it is to you. Clem, yes.  You've got to package with him. He's holding it under his arm. Good. By God, he had worked, Duke. And Berkeley fellow was doing stubborn, but I got the cash just the same.  I was just wondering. What's the matter now? We got the cash all right. But I don't like the idea of leaving anybody behind that can tell the law about us. Yeah. I was thinking the same. You mean we ought to... You wouldn't do that. You wouldn't do that. Yes, us we got to look out for. Maybe you're right, Clem. I don't see nothing else to do. But as long as it's your idea, you can take care of it. Sure. All you fellas set to pull out? Yes, sir. We're settled up. Now that we got the cash, there ain't nothing on this. You just think there ain't nothing on this. What is the law? Come on in, boys. I hope they get here. We ain't got a chance. We ain't got a chance. Sure, sir. Thank heavens you've come. This is the last fellow, brothers, Miss Ken. He's the fellow that made Red Murphy give me the cash. I did that so we'd have enough evidence to arrest you.  How did you trap us? Masked fellow followed your trail here. Careful, Sheriff. Thanks, Sheriff. I was sort of forgetting. I know what the Sheriff was about to say. Yes? He was going to tell about Dan. Get him! Get him!  Don't let him do that. We'd go with you. You're not getting away from him. What did he start to say, Masked Man? What is he going to say about Dan? I'll tell you later, Mrs. Ken. Well, we might as well be taking these fellows along to jail. He ain't taking me. Let's make a break for it, Clem. You're doing right up. I don't hold you. You wind me in the shoulder. Well, I'm darn sorry I didn't finish you up. My hand! That was a darn quick shot, stranger. I saw him go for his gun. My hand is smashed. Smashed? The Masked fellow just shot the gun out of it. Take these men away, Sheriff. Come along, you fellas. You're the Masked fellow I hadn't meddled in yet. But he is. You'll blame lucky things. Now get out there. My deputies will take care of you. I can't thank you enough for what you've done. There's no need. You said something about Dan. We saw you, son, Mrs. Kent. You did? I know you're worried about him. Well, sometimes he didn't always do just what he should. There's only one thing I can say. You needn't worry about his going wrong any longer. You sure of that? Yes, Mrs. Kent. Come, tunnel. Oh, but wait. There's more I want to ask you about Dan. We may meet again, Mrs. Kent. I sure hope so. I couldn't do it, Kimosame. She always thought of him as being honest enough, right? She must never know the truth. Kimosame? Steady, Silver. Tonto. Tonto, think you're right. Yes, Tonto. Come on, Silver. I'm up quite early. What you have just heard is a copyrighted feature of the Lone Ranger Incorporated.


How long does it take to get what you call a kata residence permit, which is the QID? Remember, when you first come into the country, your employer will organize for you what you call a temporary entry visa. And that temporary entry visa will later be converted to what you call a work residence visa. But short of this, then you need to first undergo what you call the requirements as for you to get what you call a work residence visa. And that is, you must first pass what you call the medicals that are supposed to be conducted in one way or the other. So after conducting the medicals and then you get them well or everything gets on well, then probably you will be given what you call a work residence visa that entitles you to stay and work in the country. But remember this process normally takes a period of two to four weeks depending on how the employer or depending on how your company handles the situation very fast. You find some companies that have very many employees, then definitely it will take a lot of bigger, to take a lot of longer period for you to get what you call the residence visa, what you call the QID. And if your company is very fast then it takes a period of two to four weeks for you to have that residence card, what you call the QID with you already. Because remember the only process when you come into the country for it to be converted in what you call the work visa, you only need to get through what you call the medicals and the rest will be clear. It will be converted and you will take your fingerprints then they will give you a card and you'll have the card that will enter it so you now you are a permanent residence that you can stay and work into the country.


Everybody forced tier of being 2022 prison World Cup breakaway five bucks number six random group style check out your results right here You can always find these late in sports cards comm as well Thanks everyone for joining a good luck. Yeah, I just saw that von Miller one on IR is that what just like a few games? I'm guessing I didn't hear anything that'd be like a long long time I think the bills are like a bit overrated, but I think it's more of just their play recently I think if they put it all together, they're the best team but Until that happens, right? So that happens you just assume the chiefs I'm not gonna. I'll not bet against my homes Dude is otherworldly. Yeah, Mike plenty of space Plenty of space for later Quarigacpo Who base packs to start off? You don't like Stefan digs. What do you do to the Vikings except when you guys the playoff game?  Let's see a huge name here. Good luck everybody Ramo Froyler Switzerland black breakaway prism one of one Switzerland that's groups. What's what's Brazil's group G? They're there with that group Cooper J with a one-of-one Ramo Froyler That's a nodding in forest legend right there. So There we go nodding in forest in Switzerland legend Very nice great start to this break It's funny every every Wednesday the daytime I start with a one-of-one Yeah, I literally started the first box back-to-back release days one of ones not really that wasn't really serious It was daytime silver Cody got pulled the Netherlands Very nice card little off-center, but Cody got pulled is a beast Too bad he's gonna get knocked out on Saturday Sleepy time good box here silver new era Diego Costa Portugal that Shaq as a Miami Beach, please officer breakaway Matthew Ryan Australia the Aussies moved on that is That's got to be the biggest surprise so far of this whole tournament that in Germany not advancing. That's the biggest surprise Idris Subaba rookie red breakaway Ghana 42 of 99 and base pack Moving on to box two. All right more teams getting taken a boom when that looks good Now It's breaking next by the way Braves reds and Padres just three left Padres a good team, too, and these teams are on sale guys Braves reds Padres Sean's got your link coming in chat Then the hobby case after that one has a few teams as well has a few more teams in that And we have bowman chrome light random team style guys got a ways to go on those Let's get those filled up go into Mexico Carlos Vela International ink breakaway not numbered Mexico is group see Mexico is group. Yep. See there you go Michael T Reds Padres Breakaway Cameroon Andre on Nana Andre on Nana That's a play-go-sing.  Gold now. It's a Gakbo base The gold is a Whoo Gabriel Martinelli rookie Brazil Seven of ten Monster Group G Cooper Jay again Cool hit the one of one and now a gold Martinelli group G just crushing it You have arsenal legend right there. He really is though. There's that there's that yeah This this break is on fire Break is on fire You have the color match pull the true gold yesterday out of the first half the line case of Martinelli Silver rookie Minkyu song Korea Silver new era opinion for Brazil that Martinelli. I'd say I'd say so I'd say so even if it's breakaway I would think so true many and and out of yummy. We've got a Milinkovic for Serbia Nicola Milinkovic breakaway I would hope it is doing legit red breakaway now is a Kyo go for a Hashi Japan number to 99 98 of 99 Japan group winners group winners and base He nursed Raven's legend. He nursed Reds sold now. We are at just two teams left in the next break two teams So it's Braves Padres Braves Padres left. I agree with that Paul him and Pedro you both It's just scary to think about them being on the same club and the same national team together Coop miners Breakaway, I'll do sorry for Saudi Arabia the rookie. He was he's legit, man It did get eliminated, but he's legit red rookie Collins five Cameroon Number it's 69 of 99 or redemption. All right a silver Dia for Senegal the rookie right and it is a pal Torres international ink prisms breakaway pal Torres Spain He'd not number there you go Spain silver connections Lucas Hernandez. They are Hernandez Go France Eminence World Cup. Oh my god. Oh my god For a Hashiruki pulsar Japan Breakaway pulsar purple coming up is a Brendan Aronson very nice 13 of 35. There you go group B United States Nice Aronson. What do you guys think is the first kaboom Sam's gonna pull tomorrow? I Think it'll be a dolphin Because he would he would he would he would be not super happy with that one Or a Jaguar since, you know, they can't be the Jaguars the Ravens Braves Padres guys. I'm gonna tweet this out. Do you think it's gonna be a Garrett Wilson as a checklist out? Not looked for the checklist yet Do you have the Jets tomorrow on the first break Paul? Is that what you're saying be a Garrett Wilson? I Know you I know you're a fan, but Haven't looked I haven't looked either usually if I'm not breaking the release day I'll look like the day of to be fair if it's something that I've broken before you like absolute a Hot Sam rookie guitar breakaway. Nice. Thanks. Joshua. It's good to know Now as flawless collegiate checklist out. That's That might be the one I don't expect to be out purple Alma-Wallad for Saudi Arabia rookie number 24 35 two variations of kabooms, huh? Silver Liva Kovic Croatia Horizontal and vertical. That's interesting. I don't know how I feel about that a Silver scores club Luis Suarez, Uruguay Does it say if there's like More rarity with one or it's just is what it is, you know a pulse in Denmark Pulsar Red rookie a thief Qatar to 99 Akramasana feet 31 of 99 So last year Paul there was one kaboom per case at least one kaboom per case and an explosive Now usually if there was a Numbered kaboom so there was gold to 10 and green one of one I think that was the only numbers they had if there was a number to boom There was also a base kaboom. I opened a case that had three kabooms actually last year to base and like a gold or something like that That was last year Pulsar rookie Milan Boyan for Canada One glass and kaboom.  So does not say interesting interesting Red United States the legend Matt Turner 47 of 99 The only US goalkeeper in history to have two clean sheets in one World Cup and start playing soccer till he was like a teenager Really? Yep He was a baseball player and then like Watch the World Cup. I was like I want to do that. Yeah, that's cool. Do you have any listed? Let's see all other We do not have any listed right now. Actually, we have no other World Cup breaks listed currently We'll get some more listed next week. I'm sure a yon summer Pulsar for Switzerland Just braves and Padres left guys breaking next Blue breakaway cost each for Serbia number 17-49 last two packs silver rookie honeyball for Tunisia Honeyball maybe and a silver canada team badge That'll do it. Give me a sec. We'll recap all the color here. Okay, so reds are to 99. We had a Matt Turner United States Afif Qatar Collins five Cameroon for Ahashi, Japan Baba Ghana Blue to 49 coast each Serbia purple to 35. I'm a wallet Saudi Arabia Aronson United States autos we had spain ramshan paltores and Carlos Vela Mexico Those are both non numbered or the the paltores will be non numbered. We had a one-of-one Ramo Froyler Switzerland black breakaway and a gold Gabriel Martin ellie seven out of 10 What a card That was the same group too. Congrats to group. What did I say g with brazil and switzerland together? Yep Congrats cooper with group g. Thanks again everybody baseball coming up in a bit


Alright, folks, welcome on back here this Wednesday, January 26th, shortly after 2.30pm Eastern time. Welcome on back here for our afternoon meeting. Great to see Chuck and Gary and great to see Michael, albeit he's off to the dentist. He just wrote to all of us here in the chatboard. Great to see Norman and Ari and Patrick, Louis, Leda as well. All of us joining us live inside Cyber Group. Great to see you all. And if you're joining us once again back on social media, Facebook Live or YouTube, likewise, welcome on back, folks. So let's hop right into the thick of things. We do have the Phase 1 stock course closing things out for the Phase 1 at least later on this afternoon. Bit of a small turnover with classes, right? Because right after we finish up today's set of classes with Phase 1, normally next week we would be on to the Phase 2 course. But for this month in particular, we're actually doing all of Phase 2 beginning tomorrow. So no rest for the wicked, folks. With that in mind, let's go right from top to bottom. We'll scan the market buildup or afternoon watch list. Rich, I appreciate you posting the link right there for all of our students inside our trading room. So make sure that you folks click that link, if not now, then perhaps as soon as we finish up this broadcast here, just to make sure that you're squared away and good to go. But we do have a lot to talk about. The Fed meeting just ended up concluding for right now. They left the rates unchanged. That's pretty much the headline behind it. And we ended up seeing a bit of a pop right away on the S&P ETF here, the SPI. But then it came back down. And right now, it's still a little bit indecisive with where it wants to move to, at least for the next 90 or so minutes. My prediction, and this is exactly that, just a prediction. But I think this could be a lower high, and this the SPI begins to pull back further here heading into the close. I am in one trade currently that I'll tell you about in just a bit. But for right now, Workhorse WKHS, it's on the screen here to start. It was looking good up until practically like 215. Really good, it was looking. Nice trend of higher lows, broke a higher high just before. But a very bearish pullback here in the sense of, at least to see maybe a higher low from this point from 350 to see support build from there. And then for it to run up higher, didn't even have a chance to see that happen. So hey, I like Workhorse. It's a great stock to trade when we're trading it off of news or maybe a short squeeze potentially, and this could be a potential short squeeze incoming. But the way it looks right now on the intraday, for right now, this is not too tempting here. If it ends up making a big pop by the end of this meeting, I'll certainly reconsider. But otherwise, we'll just go right from top to bottom. I'll do a little Bitcoin today, folks, with today being Wednesday. Normally Monday, Wednesday, Friday, I talk a bit about crypto. But to give you the heads up, and we'll do this probably over the next few weeks, but I think we're going to do away with Monday, Wednesday, Friday, cryptos and kind of make that its own separate video, its own video on our YouTube channel. So for right now, we'll do crypto at least at the end of this meeting. I just want to let you folks know. Ebon, with the way this is looking right now, it hasn't pulled back like that last one at least. It's holding strong for right now. And believe it or not, actually, Ebon used to move with Bitcoin. It actually is a China-based company, if I'm not mistaken. This was before China ended up making their ninth or tenth banning of crypto. This was back midway or early through last year. And Ebon was one of the stocks at least before the China government cracked down on them. They were moving really well with Bitcoin. And actually, Chuck follows up inside our live trading room by saying, they're actually the largest Chinese miner that he thought of right there. So that kind of goes hand in hand with my thoughts right there. But right now, the way this is moving, I'll put this on our list to begin by the end of this meeting. If it dumps all the way back down, maybe I knock it off our list. But for right now, we'll put this on to start. Otherwise, though, we'll keep going through. LRN didn't look too tempting at first and not looking great right now. That leads us to Groupon, GRPN. I know that Rich posted the news here inside the live trading room just a moment ago. I'm going to re-pull it up right now. All right, it looks like there's a Bloomberg report regarding Groupon. It says, payments firm SUMUP seeks new funds at a $22 billion with a B, dollar value. The note with this is that Groupon holds a stake in that company SUMUP. Interesting. Ended up coming out that new shortly prior to 130 Eastern time. And the way this is rocking right now for the afternoon, of course, we're going to put this on our list. That's right. They did a reverse split back last year. This was like a $3, $4 stock at one point, and that was before the reverse split. So the $27 price level here kind of threw me for a loop. This stock is nowhere close to all-time highs, let alone 52 BKIs. So at least in terms of maybe a historical resistance, looks like you kind of just broke above one right now, if not still testing it right around that $27.73 price, or $27.75 or so. So that in itself is actually a really big level here for Groupon. GRPN. All right. Well, we got another push on CERA, S-E-S-R-R-A. I'll kind of nickname it CERA probably going forward. Ended up making a really nice bounce back up once again this morning. And for right now, it's right near the highs of the day at least, a lot closer to the highs than it is the lows, and showing a higher or low, at least as of right now. So I'll put this on our watch list here too, S-R-R-A. I'd be really careful about this one though, folks. Really thin volume out there on the order book. All right. I may as well get to this now, because I see the spy dropping off. It's pretty much doing what I thought it would do across the next 90 minutes, but it's doing it pretty damn fast. I'm short on AMSA. I've been short from 1779, shortly after the Fed meeting came out. I was anticipating a move, and at first I went long, and I ended up getting chopped up for a minus six. But it's to say I was following AMC in particular, if I can draw it quick enough here. No, it wasn't even that. Yeah. So to say, a trend line of this stature here, it broke under it, but right back above it, generally held this trend line really well across the late morning, the early afternoon, and it broke it here. But going into the Fed meeting, this is where I was playing it. So for right now, I've been short, still short, and the way AMC looks as a short here, heading into the close. Just put this on our watch list as far as a stock that can move with the market here. You could probably say the same on a bunch of stocks. Sofi ended up making the pop at first, then dropped right back down. I'm sure a Palantir, I'm sure a Neo, I'm sure an airline, or a cruise line. You name it really. But AMC in particular was moving pretty sharp, at least even upon the market opening up today. So we've been following it, and for that reason, it was looking pretty sharp prior to the Fed announcement. So that's why I was more particular about AMC. Hey, at the end of this meeting, if there's other stocks that are moving with the market right now, folks, then I'll definitely give it a second look. So for right now, I'll add AMC in particular. We have the SRRA trade Groupon, as of now, EBON, and we'll just jump back to the gainer side here otherwise. I don't know if there's going to be much else that's going to be really moving against the grain or going completely up if the markets are falling off. Here's Lazer, LAZR, ended up making a pretty nice run from the market open today. It's holding its own going into the meeting, but even this is dropping off a little bit here. C-O-R-Z, it's shortable first off. That's the first thing I noticed. Otherwise though, it's near the highs, pushing up right now actually a decent like 50 cent move. It's not really trading a whole lot of volume per minute. So that's my bigger gripe than anything. I'll slip this on our list, I guess, the C-O-R-Z. I like the direction you're so far at least. Familiar name, Legavalin, LGVN, not the Scotch whiskey. I always like to say that. Long Everons, officially the name of the company. But yeah, ended up making a nice pop here. And for right now, hasn't dumped off completely, didn't completely pull back. So it's still showing strength to a degree. On the flip side, you could also say it's just kind of flat and trading in a tighter range. So yeah, you could say that as well. But for the meantime, at least given more of the afternoon pop and volatility here, I don't mind giving LGVN the shine. Put this on our list. All right, we got a hut. We got a few of the bitcoin mining affiliated stocks here like H-U-T hut. I saw Riot and Mara on the Gainers list a bit earlier. Huts not looking too great right now. I wish it was closer to the highs. A lot of things just generally moving with the S&P right now. Pixie pretty flat and slow right now. DraftKings from earlier today, they ended up getting the $31 price target. Look at the spy. Nice little pushback up here over the last five minutes. I have to be careful on my AMC short. I may look to a scale a decent chunk of that out right now. But otherwise, what we'll do is we'll hop over to a losers list in between. We'll see if there's anything looking just as good, if not better on that side of the field, so to say. Let's do that. GATO. Talk about a good short opportunity.  Ended up dropping off pretty much as soon as the market opened up. But then it ended up making a beautiful lower high right here. It ended up pushing up but came right back down. And when this came back down right around $375, that was a pretty big volume level that we were looking at at least inside the live trading room. So for that reason, that's the reason why I was following this as a short today. Shortable to begin with. It gave us that opportunity. If it was hard to borrow, then simply put, I wouldn't have shorted it. But just to say at least, it's down big off of some news. And if it's not going to make that illustrious dead cat bounce that we would hope for, what direction is it going to go in, you think? It's going to go down. So this ended up making for a really good trade earlier today, at least right now, though. GATO is flat. Ah, you know what's funny? El Gato, I think, means the cat. If I'm not mistaken. El Gato, I don't know what dead means in Spanish.  Right? Ron says, see, there you go. I never took Spanish, so that's like one of maybe four words in Spanish that I actually know. That's it. So just funny, funny thing there. All right, NAVI down big. It's kind of at the lows right now, actually. It's shortable, but I'm going to pass on it for right now. IQ is at the lows right now. This is almost too slow for us here as a possible short. You know, hey, we have a good eye on some shorts heading into the afternoon. But if the stock is going to have this type of liquidity on the book, it's just not really worth it. Much more often than not, at least. It's not worth it. All right, what else do we have here? Unfortunately, actually, let me click this one pretty quick. I don't want to go back to yesterday's pick here, the APM. This one didn't work out from yesterday afternoon, did it? We were talking about this as a possible setup to where it ended up beginning to make a good push right off of 225. I'm talking right even here. I jumped in. I told you, folks, I jumped in right here when I broke above 225. I did also tell you, I had my stop set right under that point, literally by a penny. I told you that on the broadcast yesterday. Unfortunately, when this pulled back, I had stopped out for a minus two, but better that than what happened afterwards, at least across yesterday afternoon, let alone this morning here. So yeah, APM, unfortunately from yesterday afternoon, it didn't make as good of a push as I wanted. But you got to know when to fold them, folks. Now, Norman wrote earlier in the chat board at least, he caught AT&T on the way down. It was at the lows going into this meeting. So not everything was pushing up, at least prior to the Fed meeting, finishing up. With AT&T here, should the markets continue to fall off, I would only anticipate for this to drop off even further. So yeah, certainly AT&T is a good short to work with going into the afternoon. There we go, Chuck. For anyone interested in knowing what dead-cap balance means in Spanish, Chuck wrote, robote del gato muerto, I think that is, if not mistaken. I have bad pronunciation on that last word, Chuck. But there you go. That's funny. All right. So folks, if there's anything else up, down, left, right, more than five percent that you'd want me to check out, let me know. Type it in the chat board at least in the meantime. I'll do a little Bitcoin, a little Bitcoin at least for right now. If I can get my charts up, at least. There we go. So not a whole lot's happened really over the last few days. We have begun to see a small retracement back up. This is the Bitcoin hourly chart, and this is the exact chart that I used in the video I posted on our YouTube channel, the same one with the lines and the EMAs. I didn't have that up back from Monday this week. So just to say, for right now, Bitcoin, albeit it did push back up pretty nicely from right around 33,000, 34,000, this dashed red line here. This is the midway point between major support that broke at 40,000 and the next major support here roughly off of 29. So right around 34.5, I drew a line there just as a midway point. I wasn't necessarily expecting that to hold as support. It held a little bit, a little shake under and back over. I'm not a believer in this move back up yet, folks, and that's the talking point. I talked about that in the video I made back on Saturday over the weekend, where should we see a retracement back up, I was anticipating on the 500 EMA here on the daily chart to act as a major resistance, given how far it broke off from it. I was expecting a smaller break off from it. All right, well, it broke off a lot more, so you have to improvise. As I said, in this case, off such a big break of the 500 EMA, I am expecting a little more turbulence now at this point as a resistance right around 40,000, 40,500, just basically to say that 500 EMA in orange. All right, so even going into the Fed meeting and once the FOMC finished up, we had a bit of a spike up on Bitcoin, but then with the markets came right back down. So that's pretty much all I got for you there, folks. Again, I'll probably do more separate Bitcoin videos, at least comparative to just slipping it in here at the end of the meetings. All right, from Skip, asking about trade station charts. Yeah, trade station is loading up charts a little slow here today. That's not just you. Try and delete your cash on your trade station folders on your C drive. You have to close the platform down and then do that. I did that early in the morning and thankfully it helped me quite a good amount. Looks like AMC is still chugging along here, folks. Spies dropping off, so this is paying off pretty nicely. If there is any other stocks that you would want me to look at here pretty quickly, just let me know. I will say right now AMC is at a bit of a support level off of 1664. It's a big print level I drew on my chart. I got Dustin JDST, the inverse gold ETFs moving on up right now. I got one here TSVT. I don't know what the chart looks like. It's from the losers list, I think. TSVT and Skip, I'll tell you what. Now my charts are freezing up on me here now too, man. You can kind of see the lag right now on my charts, my platform. I may have froze myself up, folks. That's not good. At least, somewhat good timing, at least with this being the very end of our meeting right now. Here's the TSVT trade. This thing's not looking good. I mean, not even as a short. It's down and it's just spotty. It's easy to borrow, but not particular about this one for right now. All right, folks. Then aside from that, I'll tell you I'm going to just close up shop for right now because I want to make sure I could unfreeze my computer, be good to go for class coming up. One last call, folks, for all those joining me in the phase one stock course, phase one lesson four lined up coming up at 3.05 Eastern time later on today. I'm going to repost the link right there myself. We're going to be talking all about information resources, aka news. Whole class on news, folks. I look forward to it, but aside from that, for those of us not joining us in class, best of luck trading here, going into the market close. I'll talk to you, folks, all soon. Take care.


Okay. Well, Steve, if you're there, we'll segue immediately to you. I am here. Can everybody hear me? Yes, we can. Good. In retrospect, I guess I should have, if we go to the next slide, please. In retrospect, if I had to use a smaller font like Howard did, we could get these all on one slide and look at them at the same time. But they're broken up into two slides. On this first one, I think you should get the sense by now from both Maryland and Debbie's presentations that the consensus of our group was that discovery research should remain a high priority for the future. And working with the phenotyping group, one step is obviously to decide what traits or phenotypes are sort of high priority for the next phase of the network. And then the topic for discussion, and some of this has been occurring in the sort of online chat, is whether or not just go with existing data and work with improving the analytical tools and methodology to use existing data, or whether there should also be some effort into denser data generation, whether it's by next-gen sequencing or exon arrays. As a sort of a non-genomic person pursuing this more from a pharmacoperspective, I guess we could also add in that existing data could also include the longitudinal phenotypes that several people have alluded to, and using this in the context of the contribution to disease progression. This also lends itself at gene environment interactions as well. Also the impact of therapeutic interventions on the trajectory of progression. The second point that came out of our discussions was this whole issue of not throwing the baby out with the bathwater and looking at the importance of rare variants. And again, up for discussion would be the most appropriate platforms, whether it be a genotyping or a sequencing platform to capture them, but also resources that may need to be put into developing appropriate tools to detect their effects. Next slide. So this next point gets at one of Debbie's last points, and that is considering study designs other than a straight GWAS type format for discovery purposes. And for example, the example that she gave looking at extreme discordant phenotypes, at least for continuous variables, and coupling them with your platform of interest, and I put a whole genome sequencing here. And, you know, the potential for this particular approach to be a little bit more efficient in identifying causal variants and especially rare causal variants. And then the last point that our group would propose to the larger group at whole would be again something that was mentioned by both Marilyn and Debbie, and that is looking at other sources of genomic material, RNA or going back into the DNA and looking at relation, for example, for these genomic analysis. And then on the EMR side of things, looking to see how additional data can be captured or parsed to look at environmental factors and comorbidities for gene-by-environment interactions, for example. So those are the four issues that were raised by our group as being something to pose to the rest of the group for their thoughts and comments. And I'll toss it back to the chair. Okay, the floor is open for comments or questions on EMR and genomic discovery. Mark Williams here. A thought occurred to me as Debbie was talking, again, trying to bridge the attention that we have between discovery and implementation. This was in the context of the rare variants. I think one of the issues that we're all going to be dealing with as we receive secondary findings from our genomes, exomes, and high-density chips that we're thinking about clinically returning is the lack of information that we have on the impact clinically of some of these rare variants, even in genes that we know quite well. One of the things that we'll be doing is to try and use our traditional methods of contextualizing that data, using family history and other sorts of things to understand what's the potential impact. To me, that seems to lend itself to the idea that if we did a rare variant focus, we could study how we could use electronic health record mining to try and contextualize rare variant information to add additional information for clinical return and implementation. So that could be a potential study topic for eMERGE III that would bridge, again, this discovery and implementation chasm. This is Dan Rodin. I have to say Rodin now because there's other down on the phone. I agree with Mark, but at a practical level, I think you have to make some attempt to limit the minority frequencies down to which you're willing to go. If you find a rare variant that is one in a million or one in a hundred thousand, it's going to be very, very tough unless you know something about the biology to assign any kind of phenotype to that. And so I think the sweet spot for us is probably minority frequencies around 0.1%, plus variants in disease genes that have been implicated. And as Zach said a couple of hours ago, you find that variants that have been implicated as causes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or channelopathy are actually much more common than you give them credit when you start to look across very large populations and we're finding that along the way. So I think that one thought is exactly which rare variants we want to focus on. And I think that the variant of uncertain significance is one in ten thousand or one in a thousand, something that emerges is really, really well suited to attack. To sequence data, it seems to me that we should report all variants even if we only see it once in 100,000 people and put it in a database because other people are going to be putting that data forward and annotating those variants even if we can't determine ourselves alone if they're pathogenic, it's going to be really important going forward. I totally agree with that and that's what we're going to be doing in EmergePGX and as data accumulates worldwide you can start to make some sense of that but I think over the next five years it's a one in a million variant unless there's some biology around it, it's going to be hard to make sense of it. But yeah, I totally agree that we have to figure out a way of archiving this worldwide. So this is Haukon here. So as you know the new platform from Illumina on the X-10 which is currently tailored towards whole genome, I mean it's very likely going to be adapted to exome even though that will probably take some time but an exome could probably be sequenced for about a hundred dollars sort of say a year, year and a half from now. So in the interim a strategy to sort of customize a chip with this rare variant content, particular content that are sort of with potential or putative damaging impact or loss of function variance and so forth and that can actually be typed now extremely cost-efficiently across you know thousands of samples for a relatively sort of low amount of money even though it's going to cost some money. So in the interim that would potentially be a very, very powerful strategy across all the sites because that would open up the rare variant content for all the phenotypes that we have and we don't have that today. So this is John Harley Cincinnati. I just asked a question that when we concentrate on rare variants and we don't have all of our samples genotype we rely on imputation. And as the frequency of the variant drops the accuracy of the imputation is disastrous. And so how do we, you know, we don't, we aren't able to take advantage of our huge numbers because the error introduced by imputation is so big. Is there anybody that has a solution to this problem? You need to sequence. So this is Rex. I'd like to weigh in. I'd really like to endorse the idea of thinking about environmental factors. We've played a little bit around with GIS tools. And I think, you know, one of the things that we could do very well which isn't done very well in most cases is given the longitudinal nature of the people that we're following is to think about some of these environmental factors. I think there's going to be increased opportunities to capture some of these bits of data. Marilyn talked a little bit about environmental protection agency measurements that are being made. So I think to be able to start to tackle gene environmental interactions using GIS approaches and some of these environmental measures is also something that would uniquely be possible in an Emerge 3 for us to take a look at. Well, this is Chris, and while I find that idea elegant, I want to make sure we're somewhat cautious and thoughtful about this. For some populations, and your Chicago population, Rex might be a superb candidate for this. For other populations, they're not always, as we say, population-based, and hence the density of sample cases in any environmental geocode. You run into power problems very quickly with environmental association, particularly when you're treating it as a covariate and a substrate. Chris, this is Marilyn Ritchie. One of the other things that I think folks could think about, and this is something that Marshfield has done in Emerge 2, and that is to use the Phoenix toolkit as a mechanism to collect environmental data. We were awarded a supplement as part of the Phoenix Rising program by NHGRI, and so some of the Phoenix toolkit measures were sent out to the Emerge participants, and we've actually started mining that data, and we're finding really interesting gene environment results for type 2 diabetes and some for cataracts, and we only implemented a few of the Phoenix toolkit measures. That's something that other sites could do either electronically or paper forms. It's something that you could port to an iPad that people could do in clinics. You could put it on the web that people could do through their My Health at Geisinger or Vanderbilt or what have you, and that's another way that even without relying on population-based environmental data, you could collect it on the participants in the biobanks. I certainly agree that would be hugely more efficient and wouldn't suffer the broad association problem that you have with geocoding. I actually think the Phoenix toolkit would be the appropriate choice for collecting that kind, so I agree with that. That might be another agenda item to put on the discussion with large health system providers when they're discussing it with the vendors of health records because the patient portal is going to become a part of the mandated electronic medical records eventually, and as they're building them, it would be nice to have patients uploading various lifestyle things that can be merged with their electronic medical records. One question is, are there other things that the Coordinating Center should be working on in the future? I mean, they did an awful lot of work with data cleaning and then the imputation, but are there other things that would make the dataset more effective for other analyses? That would be a good focus for Emerge 3. So one focus there, this is how Conn, is on the copy of the variation analysis because that's another whole dimension that, you know, focusing there from the rare variance standpoint because most of the data is typed on Illumina that can open up a very fruitful sort of discovery and focus across all the phenotypes, again, from a data mining standpoint. And algorithms can, you know, we have algorithms that can be applied on these data at the individual sites or jointly, and then the whole thing gets sort of meta-analysed together. This is Terry. I did want to ask about the issue of sequencing. When we've approached sort of large-scale sequencers, the question they often ask is, well, how many cases of a given disease do you have? Because they're very interested in looking at, you know, thousands or tens of thousands of cases of disease X, and that has not been something that Emerge has really focused on because we're sort of phenomic, as it were. So how do we address that question other than say, gee, we've got so many wonderful phenotypes, isn't this just as good or better? So, Gail, you? So I think we don't need to have a disease focus. I'd be really excited to sequence the 56 ACM gene. We know what those genes do, but we don't know if the variants in those genes do. And we could look both for variant annotations, pathogenic, and importantly, not pathogenic. Everybody is going to have sequence variants if they're really what they do. And then we could also look for pleotropic effects of those same genes. So there's a discovery possibility there, too. And then there's lots of implementation questions. How do you, you know, many of my health is very concerned about those 56 genes now because of the NG recommendations. So how do you implement that? How do you get decisions before? How do you educate providers? What do patients want to know? You know, I think it really hits all the things that we can do really well. And having those phenotypes that we have so in such depth gives us a unique resource for that kind of annotation. And I think even at the pediatric sites there is really important work. You know, 49, I think out of the 56, have pediatric phenotypes. Plus, the pediatric sites really could look into this idea of mandatory return of adult onset mining. So children, which has been a hugely controversial recommendation, they could really ask their family, what do they want, ask their providers what they want. But I think that that is a space where there's a lot of controversy, a lot of interest for the health system. And we have a really unique capability. And I don't think it's something to do with 16s. I would add a couple more, by the way.  I agree with Gail. I think that one could add to such a panel, I think, which would be extremely meaningful and something that can be done uniquely in eMERGE, things like a list of the highly penetrant forms of diabetes, highly penetrant monogenic forms of diabetes and others. I think which, you know, it would be very helpful to understand among sort of common complex diseases what forms are diagnosable on a molecular level and to what extent is that, how frequent that is. So to be interested in Steve Leder and Debbie Nickerson's comments on that, let me just ask, both of you had pointed toward non-coding variation. And here we're talking about really focusing on genes, even though there are some non-coding reasons. Obviously, in the entrant. So Steve or Debbie, any thoughts? I think it's great to look broadly at genes, but I think that different platforms have different outcomes in terms of what you look at. I mean, many people are sequencing whole genome, but they end up looking at only the coding and that few percent that are well annotated by encode as being highly functional. But I think broadly, whole genome is an important route to go because you can look at variants that are difficult to look at like indels and CNVs by just sheer capture. Thanks. Steve, what do you think? Well, for me, non-coding for me really points more to regulatory regions as being of interest. But just to understand, I'm coming at this from a pediatric perspective as well in that when we are looking at things in kids, there's so much change that is going on between birth and sort of adulthood that you have to look somewhere besides the coding region of a gene for what's changing as kids grow and develop. And to some extent, we know very little about how this really works in senescing adults as well as we move towards a geriatric population. So for me, the non-coding stuff really, I'm really thinking about important regulatory regions and being able to identify those and characterize them. Steve, this is Dick Winchelbaum. In all of our studies of variation in cancer drug response, the majority of the hits that are functionally important regulate transcription. They're a non-coding region. So this is very brilliant. I think that it's clear that from an economic standpoint, we can't do whole genome sequencing of 50,000 people. But we could look at a smaller number of genes. And since these genes have been implicated in human disease, they're reportable, they're actionable, we can look both at exomes and introns. I think that if we focused on a subset of genes, it would be a parody for looking at the whole genome. I mean, it would be scalable. And I think that there's the 50-some genes here. Maybe all of us have some other favorite genes. If we had 100 genes, it's kind of catchy. Instead of 1000 genomes, we have 100 genes that are looked at across a large number of people. And again, this would be as a parody, what are we going to do when we have a large number of whole genome sequences? This really cuts across all of that. I would point out that's very reminiscent of the decision early on with the ENCODE project to tackle 1%. I mean, I don't know if I like this idea or not. That's a separate issue. Sure. But it is reminiscent that the same rationale went in. We're never going to interpret the whole human genome. So there was a whole process to pick the 1%, which was kind of complicated, but we got there. Everybody said the 1% until you felt comfortable enough to scale to the whole genome. So this would be a similar circumstance. However many genes you pick. I think we could also exercise diversity here. So you'd have a specific set of child care. I think we could do really well on that avenue. So is the idea to do non-coding as well, right, of those genes? Yes. I think if you could find that. Yeah. So if you know the regulatory reasons of it, I'm sure it's going to be a good plan. I was actually going to clarify it better. I mean, you would take a gene and you would just go end to end, maybe X number of bases upstream and downstream and just do the whole segment.  I'm just trying to stimulate the conversation maybe towards Xome versus targeted panel. So what's the difference there? If you get Xome. What's the difference? These are actually asking very different questions. If you're only going to know Xomes, you're going to make the assumption that that's what you're going to find. I thought the idea was that you have these types of genes that are interest and it's only a non-coding. And you want to get a complete inventory deep in lots of people. That's what I wanted you to say, Eric. I don't know what I'm saying. I was just trying to re-articulate what I thought I heard. But what I also heard was a variance approach, which was you take the X number of genes and you take all the Xons. And the introns. Any regulatory regions you know of. The introns are elsewhere. Somewhere else. I mean, there are some that have regulatory regions that are identified in other chromosomes. And so maybe look at those as they become added in. But it takes two years, Debbie, or more to develop a targeted platform like this? No, I think it's much easier now than it was. I don't think it's, I think we have a lot more experience. And I think the PGRN has great data with the PGXC. They can look at these questions. Debbie, what do you think molecular inversion from the PGXM? You know, I think it's a matter of cost and ease of implementation. I think some can be cheap. But whether they're broadly accurate to many genes is not known. We will give you the card. If we put this into an RSA, I would suggest that we could be agnostic as to the technique and let the people that are putting in proposals discuss how they would do it.  And so that would also allow them for a methodologic comparison about what's the best way to actually do it. Okay, and we're going to need to wrap up the discussion. Just a very good point that there are these commercial entities that are trying to make these panels of two or three thousand genes. So that if you have a patient with marfan or you feel a patient with hypertrophic, you just order that set and then you can just pick and choose and analyze. Because what's happening is that, you know, we're realizing that there's many variants that may cause, for example, an aneurysm. And so I end up ordering a panel of 15 Canada genes, which is like five thousand dollars. And I may still not get the information because they may just do certain variants or not. So I think, you know, that's another, you know, it's not the whole exome, but it's like what are the thousand hundred or fifteen hundred genes that are most often used in the clinical setting and perhaps go with those. And also it would go back to Debbie's point that if you're using some of these in the clinical setting, you would have a familiar structure to interpret the variants much more efficiently. Okay, so I'd like to thank all of the participants for actually all of our panels this morning for a very rich and thoughtful discussion for future directions and eMERGE. And we're going to, I guess we're down to about a 20-minute break for lunch. Careful because you're not going to get all these people down to the cafeteria. We'll do our best. So we'll plan to start somewhere around half past the hour. The idea of these folks should get their work done.  On the first floor here you come up.


What's the word, y'all? I cannot believe I'm making a Russell Westbrook video right now. This is gonna be a lot different than the other Westbrook videos you've seen on the internet over the last year or so, because I'm not gonna be hypercritical of bro. And listen, I'm not saying that he's void of criticism because of course this year objectively was disastrous for him and the Lakers organization, but I think we've gone too far. Why do I always have to be the guy to tell the fans you've gone too far? Again, if we wanna talk exclusive about 2021, 2022, sure, let's do that. But y'all just talking about legacies and going back to 2016, 2017, you're bragging. Because I think, and listen, I'm guilty of this as well as an NBA fan. Players are only as good as our last memory of them. I'm guilty of it, but it's just not true. And it got me to the point where I wanted to go through Russell Westbrook's career and rank his seasons from the worst of his career to the best of his career. And this is highly inspired by Anthony Fanteno. He does this exact thing, but with artists talking about different projects. So I'll put that link in the description. What I found out in my three days of research, if you wanna call it that, is trying to figure out which season was better. 2012, 2013 is like pulling teeth. So there's a lot of subjectiveness in this video, but this is my goddamn video. So I'm gonna do what I want. I did call it my boy, Cone, three Cone. Links is in the description. He's one of the biggest OKC fans that I know and one of the biggest Russell Westbrook fans I know. And asked him, bro, what are some things that I might have forgot as a fan that you remember as a super fan? So he helped me out. So shout out to Cone. Leave a like, subscribe if you want to. It's really your decision. The worst season of Russell Westbrook's career is the 2021-2022 season with the LA Lakers. Boom, mic drop. This is a bad year for Russell Westbrook. Like I said, you can go and watch a multitude of videos on the internet right now talking about Russell Westbrook and the season. It was the worst of his career by my standards. Coming into the year, he was ranked as the 29th best player in all of basketball and people were like, oh, there's hella disrespectful. Russell Westbrook and LeBron James and Anthony Davis got this new trio and they're calling themselves 360.  You just need to be a top 10 seeder that have a chance at the playoffs and they failed to do that. And it's not strictly on Russell Westbrook. You have injury stuff. You have the rest of the roster being as old as anybody in America. But this team underperformed and Russell Westbrook was a part of it. If you type in Russell Westbrook Lakers on YouTube, there are a multitude of videos basically showcasing all of the low lights of Russell Westbrook season. Some of them as long as 20 minutes long. This is bad. We haven't seen that happen in any other year of his career. Also, I don't have a script, by the way. I have bullet points, but I dropped out of school because I don't do scripts. So shout out to all the YouTubers that do deep dives and write scripts.  And one thing that is true about Russell Westbrook's career, especially once we get past the MVP season. And one thing that I can be critical of Russell Westbrook for pretty much since he left OKC is the lack of want to change for the betterment of the organization. I thought that Russell Westbrook was his best when he was screening for LeBron James. He would do it six times in one game and then he'll do it six times over the next 10 games. He's just never really adjusted. And because of that, we get to the point where at summer league where the star player LeBron and Russell Westbrook refused to even talk to each other. So that is the worst year of his career. The second worst year of his career is the 2008-2009 season, his rookie year in the NBA. I remember watching his draft very, very vividly because if you didn't know, my Chicago Bulls are the first overall pick. And I was sitting around just praying that the Bulls took Derek Rose and not Michael Beasley because Derek Rose from Chicago. And at this point, I'm 10 years old. So I don't know much about who's, but I wanted to see Derek Rose. And if you look at that entire draft board, there's only one, at least in the first round, there's only one guaranteed lock to make the Hall of Fame. And that is Russell Westbrook. I know you're having some conversation about Kevin Love. I know you're having some conversation about MVP Derek Rose. There's only one bona fide first-ballot Hall of Famer, unanimous Hall of Famer, and that is Russell Westbrook. And one of the things about Russell Westbrook coming into this season is people like, oh, he's not a natural point guard. When he was drafted, he talked to Stephen A. Smith and said, I am a point guard. And he made it his mission to become one of the best point guards in history. But even with that said, it is the second worst year of his career because he was a rookie that was extremely wrong. The best moment of his rookie season is late in it. He went against the Dallas Mavericks and he got his very first triple double. And bro, never look back. He got a little taste of what a triple double could do. And he's like, I want to get all of them. And listen, I ain't got no sources, but I think in the locker room after that game, I heard Dirk say, that boy got that dog in him. You feel me? That boy got that dog in him. And it took literally the last second of the game where he got his 10th rebound. But it happened. The next year on the list is the 2013-2014 season, where Russell Westbrook missed about half of the year with orthoscopic knee surgery. That's all I can really say. Once we got to the playoffs, he was great. They ended up losing to the San Antonio Spurs, but more than that, he was basically just the number two to the eventual NBA MVP, Kevin DeRant. But since he only played like half of the season, I can't really put this any higher. I wanted to put the season a lot higher than what it is, but it is the 2020-2021 season with the Washington Wizards. This man, there was so much charm to this season. The Wizards started off the year 35 and 28 and finished 34 and 38. So they were a self-hundred team, but it was enough to get into the playoffs. And he promised his teammates months before that he gonna get them in the playoffs, man. This is the year where he became the all-time leading triple double-gitter pass in Oscar Robertson. And it was also the year that I became aware of the Russell Westbrook cycle meme. If you're unaware of what this meme is, it's where Russell Westbrook starts off every season where he's bad and people are questioning whether or not he's still got it. And then he has a month where he's creeping his way up and people are starting to realize and then he boom, back into superstardom. That's what this season was for the Wizards. And he had a game we had 35 points, 21 assists and 14 rebounds versus the Pacers. Also, I do want y'all to go to YouTube and type in Russell Westbrook versus Pacers because some of the best games of his career happened against Indiana. I don't know what the organization did to him, but he really takes it personal. But ultimately, there's a team that didn't do much. They got to the playoffs, but that was it. I was actually rooting for Russ a ton because there was a moment in the playoffs series where a fan poured a bunch of popcorn on Russell Westbrook. And again, the fans not understanding boundaries. So at that point I was like, let's go Russ. But they were still going against the 76ers who were the way better team. But Russ helped carry them to the playoffs after a really, really bad start. And now we move on to the 2009-2010 season. This is sophomore Russell Westbrook. And when I tell you, this is one of the most fun seasons to research because there were so much that went on. This team went from a 23-win team to a 50-plus-win team. And the West of Congress was so elite that 50 wins got them the eight seed. And they matched up against Kobe Bryant. 50, imagine winning 50 and having to match up against the eventual champions because that's exactly what they did. And again, they went against the eventual champions and they held their own. They took them all the way to six. And in game six, Palga saw him hit a game when in tip layup, whatever you want to call it. And I rewatched that entire game. And yeah, down the stretch, Russell Westbrook did some bone head shots, but we talk about Russell Westbrook here. That's one of the things that Russell Westbrook does. But there's a moment, and there's nothing to do with Russell Westbrook. There's a moment late in this game for like one minute to go where Ron, our test takes a three. But in the corner, we have a wide open Kobe Bryant and Kobe was hot. Kobe wanted that ball and Kobe took and made some of the toughest shots. We love Kobe being Bryant, rest in peace. But bro, that game was another one of those Kobe classics. But like I said, one thing you're gonna realize throughout this is that Russell Westbrook has lost in the playoffs to the eventual champions a lot in his career. I mean, a lot. It starts off right here the second year of his career against the eventual champion, L.A. Lakers. But you don't hear me say eventual champions a couple more times. But year number two, he blossomed and became sixth and most improved player, which is a duh. Next on my list is the 2018-2019 season with OKC. Actually, the last year, we saw Russ in that jersey. Everything happened so fast between Paul George getting traded to the Clippers and everything like that. I didn't think that it was gonna be the last time we'd see Russ, but it was. And you know who did it to him? Damien Lilla with the wave off. But in this season, Russell Westbrook decided to do the thing that he did with Kevin Arendt throughout his career was just take a back seat to allow Paul George to finish top three and MVP. And that's one of the reasons why this is higher because individually, this is like a bad and Russell Westbrook terms offensive season when it comes to scoring. But the fact that he allowed Paul George to be Paul George and become and have one of the best seasons of his career is a lot testament to Russell Westbrook ability to allow his teammates to be great. Next, we have the 2019-2020 season with the Houston Rockets. Listen, y'all might see this as high. I wanted to put it higher because this season was so much fun for me as a fan. And I mean as a fan of the NBA because again, I wasn't a big Russell Westbrook fan.  They said, Robert Coventon, we gonna bring you in and we gonna have you play center because we wanna allow Russell Westbrook to do what Russell Westbrook does. And what did he do? He became one of the first guards to lead the league in paint scoring in history. He did that. And in January or February of that month, after they traded Clinkapella, Russ Average 33 points. This is a two month span by the way, 33 points, seven rebounds, eight assists. This team decided to do something that no team has ever done before. Yeah, we're going towards small ball, but all time small ball. They were doing that. And him and James Harden together was kind of cool for a moment. But then it got to the playoffs. He heavily struggled. I think he averaged like 15 points in the playoffs. But I'm just going off the vibes. And for me to see Russell Westbrook just running to the basket and dunking on people, that was fun. Next we have the 2010-2011 season. I wanna remind people that at this time, Russell Westbrook was just 21 years old. And this is the first time he had made an all-star game. Ended up being all NBA second team. And guess what? We got to the playoffs. So what did they do? They lost to the eventual champion Dallas Mavericks as a second time in his career, basically back to back seasons where he lost to the eventual champions. And this is around the time that criticism starts to build. Because once you get to the point where your team is successful and in this point, the OKC Thunder were, people are gonna start the nitpick. And we started to see articles written about Russell Westbrook shooting so much. Why does Russell Westbrook think he's the best guy on the team? But we also saw the opposite, where people were legitimately having the conversation of who is the best player on the OKC Thunder. That was a timeline, ladies and gentlemen. We're talking about a 21-year-old Russell Westbrook. Also, people questioned if he was the best point guard in all of basketball at 21 years old. That is elite because I want you to go back and look at that season and look at all the great point guards that were still in the NBA. And people were questioning whether or not Russ was number one. An amazing season for Russ. The next season is 2017-2018. This is the first year of the big three. Paul George is on the team now. And guess what? Carmelo Anthony is here, man. And listen, we about to go run it up. They did it. I'm pretty sure they lost in the first round to a rookie Donovan Mitchell. But this season, individually, was so dope for him coming off his MVP season to still see him put up some pretty good numbers. But again, they did lose in the first round, but there was the one game. They were down 3-1 to the Jazz and they were down by 25 points in the third quarter. The season is practically over. And in the third quarter, Russell Westbrook decided to turn up, brohead three after three after three, and they were down by 25 points and they went to go home game for them and they won. Again, they ended up losing the series, but that game in itself, to see Paul George take over to see Russell Westbrook take over was cool, but you know how to end it.  You know how all of these seasons end. The 2012-2013 season had the potential to be the best season of his career, like legitimately. The team won 60 games and Russ was the start and point guard and he was one of the best players in all the basketball. And this is the year after their finals run when they lost to the Miami Heat. They get to the playoffs again as a 60-win team and then the Patrick Beverly thing happened. And like everybody across America as an NBA fan heart dropped because a lot of us predicted that OKC will be right back in the finals, but this time they would win. And to have Patrick Beverly go out there and do that, obviously hurt the chances because they ended up getting eliminated in the second round to the Memphis Grizzlies and the season was void. And then we get to the 2015-2016 season and this is one of my favorite seasons of Russ's way. I mean, again, this is revisionist history here, but there were so many moments throughout this year where Kevin Durant defended Russell Westbrook that that's what made him leaving at the end of the season so mind-blowing for so many people. Listen, they were up 3-1 against the Warriors and they lost. And in these post-game interviews, it was K.D. Russ versus the World. K.D. Russ versus Steph Curry. They're talking about Steph Curry's defense and Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook are laughing at the fact that the people are saying that Russ was an underrated defender. Russell Westbrook for the series started saying, listen, Steph Curry's a great shooter but he ain't nothing that I ain't never seen before. They got the famous Mark Cuban incident. Well, Mark Cuban said, hey, there's only one superstar OKC and it's Kevin Durant and Kevin Durant gave a legendary response.  Don't listen to this.  But Russell Westbrook was first team All-N-B-A to season and he won the All-Star game MVP. Something he's done a lot in his career. Russ is one of those dudes that he don't care that it's supposed to be the off-time for the All-Star game. He wants every award that he could potentially get. And in some of these All-Star games, Bro is putting up 40 point triple doubles. Like this is a random regular season game. He plays hard. That's one of the things you can say about Russell Westbrook. We're down to the last three seasons of Russell Westbrook's career. And at number three, we have the 2011-2012 season. This was the finals run where everybody fell in love with the core of the OKC Thunder. Russ was young. KD was young. James Harder was young. Sergey Bakker was young. And everybody saw that they were destined to win a championship eventually. They made it all the way there. And this run, this playoff run versus the Western Conference was as legendary as it gets. Russell Westbrook was amazing. But when you're going against LeBron James, Chris Boss, and Dwayne Wade, you know, your chances of winning that series is not great, considering the other guys are basically in their prime. And y'all barely owed enough to drink alcohol at this point. But again, everybody thought they will be back. And that is why to this day, I don't look at a young team that makes a run and think to myself, they will be back because you never really know what's going to happen. James Harder gets traded. And at three years later, Kevin Durant goes to the Warriors. They never got back, y'all. They never got back. Four of a patch of Beverly. I'll tell you if it wasn't for Patrick Beverly. I gotta hold my phone for these two seasons because I got so much to say about the final two seasons. The best two seasons of Russell Westbrook's career. Number two, the 2014-2015 season. In this, when he was the scoring champ, it was all gonna be a second team. And again, the all-star game MVP. Kevin Durant went down in an injury in the preseason. And then in the second game of the season, Russell Westbrook also went down with a hand injury. Russell Westbrook eventually came back after missing 14 games. And he still helped this team win 45 total. Now again, we talked about the Western Conference. As I mentioned earlier, it took 50 wins to get the 18th in and 45 was not good enough to make the playoffs. But a lot of people saw this season for Russell Westbrook that if he was in the playoffs and if they wanted a couple more games, he could have been the MVP of the entire league this year. This was the birth of masked Russell Westbrook. You got untucked Kyrie. You got masked Russell Westbrook. This was some of the best version of him. He got hit in the face, boom. He had to have face surgery. And three days after face surgery, he was back on the court and he dropped. 49 points, 16 assists and 10 rebounds. Three days after surgery. It was against the 76ers doing the heavy tank error, but it's still NBA basketball. It still counts as a 49 point triple double if you ask me. I don't care if the best player on the court for them was Rhondie Hollis Jefferson. Actually cannot confirm whether or not Rhondie Hollis Jefferson was in this game. Don't listen to this.  But he still had to get the stats and he did that. At least that's one thing you can say about Russell Westbrook. He always gonna get his stats. And then like I mentioned, into the All-Star game, he put a 41.16 and a 10. He's one point shy of breaking the all-time record for most points in the game. Eventually broke by Anthony Davis. I'm not mistaken. But again, if it was a basketball game too, he played boas out there hooping. And this is something that I didn't remember myself. So shout out to my boy, Cone, because he really, really came through. In February, there was a game where Russell Westbrook put up 48 points and lost to an eventual game winner from Anthony Davis. Now, this game winner is basically the second best highlight of Anthony Davis' career behind the game winner that was in the bubble. This game winner, randomly in February, was the reason that OKC did not make the playoffs. Because OKC and the Pelicans ended up having the exact same record and the tiebreaker went to the Pelicans on the double clutch three-pointer from Anthony Davis. It's extremely, extremely unlucky, but it was a reality that, listen, every single game matters whether you like it or not. Throughout NBA history, there's this one meme about David Robinson where he was competing for the scoring title and in the last game of the season, his team spoon fed him so much so he could put up 71 points. So I think it was Shaq that was second. That Shaq had no chance of winning it. And boom, David Robinson was the scoring champ that season. And I'm not saying it's exactly the same thing, but you do know that Russell Westbrook was gunning for that scoring champ, especially when you look at the numbers. In the last five games of the season, he averaged 32.2 points per game to win the scoring title, including a game versus the Pacers. Like I said earlier, bro, hate the Pacers, where he scored 54 points, which is great. He also took 43 shots to get there. Like, he was gunning for those things while he was in second place. James Harden, he kind of slowed down only averaged 22 points over those same time period and boom, boom, boom. And we get the scoring title for Russell Westbrook. We also start to see some of the greatest of all time to show their love to Russell Westbrook. This is from Alan Iverson, pound for pound, the best player of all time. I'm the biggest Westbrook fan I think there is. You know what I mean? Because he reminds me so much of myself as far as his heart and landing on the line night in and night out. Just a guy that's going to bring it every single night. And that is from, again, Alan Iverson. The world recognized that Russell's really that dude, but at that point, he couldn't do it by himself and just having a little bit of help from Kevin would have helped them make the playoffs, but they didn't, but individually, what a season. And then lastly, you knew that the best year of his career was going to be the 16-17 MVP year. Even looking back on it, I am still amazed at how clutch this season was. And here are some clutch moments from SB Nation, shout out to them. The thunder went down by 14 when Russell Westbrook had a game time shot and won the game in overtime versus the Magic. They were down by 12 in the final three minutes and 30 seconds and he had a game winner to beat the Mavericks. He scored the last 15 points in the buzzer beater to beat the Nuggets. And one little caveat that people forget about that, that game was so significant for the different Nuggets because since they lost that, their chances of making the playoffs went to zero. Russell Westbrook in one single night averaged the most triple doubles in a season and also killed the hopes for the Denver Nuggets. That game was insane. He himself went on a 15 to 0 run in the final two minutes and 30 seconds to beat the Grizzlies. He scored 11 of the final 13 points in a game winner versus the Jazz. He scored 19 of the last 22 points for OKC to beat the Blazers. And that's not to mention like all of the dunks, all of the crazy passes, like everything encompassing to an MVP. He averaged 31.6, 10.6 rebounds and 10.4 assists and he led that team to 47 games. And even in the moment, people are questioning whether or not he should have won MVP. Me included, I think on my podcast in that time, I gave my MVP award to James Harden in the time. But again, having revisited his history and going over and watching these games again and watching these moments again, undoubtedly he was the MVP. I look at that roster and it is God awful. Like it has some names like the Montessor bonus Victor Ladipo, both of them ended up being all stars eventually. But this point in their careers, they were very far from it. This is before Victor Ladipo did his full workout routine to get his shape. This is rookie, the Montessor bonus who averaged like six points per game. They did not have a lot and he got them to the sixth seed. I have nothing but respect for that season because it might be one of the best individual seasons I've ever seen ever. When you think about the load that he had to carry, you think about the success, you think about the stakes, Kevin Arrant just left to go to the Warriors. He's like, I'm going to do all of this by myself and even beat them in the regular season when they were yapping at each other. Like altogether, this was the best year of his career. You know, we're going through all these games. There are so much that I couldn't talk about for the sake of time. Just in general, Russell Westbrook, like I said earlier, is a bona fide first ballot hall of famer where it's not even a real question. And the fact that people are going back in his history and trying to relive these moments and trying to talk bad about these moments blows my mind. And I wasn't a Russell Westbrook fan going into this, but leaving it, I am. I think there's a lot to be said about a player that cares about his teammates as much as Russell Westbrook does. Even in this moment where he is on the trade block, when everybody in LA wants him gone, he pulls up to summer league and he's coaching the young guys. Even in this moment where everybody wants him gone, including the star player on the team, I know LeBron never said it, but listen, we all noticed. He pulled up to Darvin Ham's first presser when Darvin Ham was announced to be the head coach. And even though he might personally want out of LA, he's still dedicating everything he can to this team. There has to be a lot said about the health of Russell Westbrook because other than the one season where he only played 46 games, this guy has been a consistent guy to play 95 plus percent of seasons. 82 games, 82 games, 81 games, 89 games. This guy has been as hardworking and as durable as anybody. And yeah, I don't really know what the future of Russell Westbrook really looks like. Will he be on the Lakers? Will he be on another team? People are speculating that he might not even get another contract if his Lakers deal falls away. I can say with confidence that Russell Westbrook was one of the greatest to ever pick up a basketball and I got nothing but respect for him. So let me know what you think. Whether it be about this video, whether it be about Russell Westbrook, I'm all ears and I appreciate you. I appreciate Kohn, I appreciate Prince Prodigy for putting in all the time and editing this video and I appreciate you for watching. I swear I'd be flowy, bro. I'm just...