What's up everybody, Jason here for JaspysCaseBricks.com. We just sold out the second half of the brand new 2021 Panini Prison Football Hobby. Six bucks, half case break, pre-coutines number two. Number all card ship. And again, nothing super, super crazy in this first half. So we're all kind of expecting there to be something pretty big in the second half. And like I said, if you have a character sign and a little pack filler symbol, most likely you want that from a team random slash pack filler team random. So there you go.  And I did write two. Where does it go? Two on all the boxes. It looks like a horrible two, but it is a two. So you can see there's like twos all over just to let you know if it's in the same case. And here we go. The menu describes them as pork tenderloin stuffed with Sweden cream cheese and green onion wrapped in applewood smoked bacon dip, that sounds very, that sounds delicious. It's like so many ingredients. DB saying that anybody a big cheese fan in here by any chance. Trying to see what a trade value I should put on a Nike Swoosh Auto PSA 10 Clyder Zolaire football. I doubt my mystery credit. I don't know what the value of that potentially would be, but I think everything in the mystery credit was at least almost the spot price. At least the worst hit is at least. And then obviously the biggest hits were like it's over a thousand to like 1500 to 2000. Case it. Little patch. So we had two of those in the three boxes of random teams already. So maybe we have two hiding here. All right, also two guys. You guys see that right there? Gold, gold. It's Kareem Hum for the browns gold. 10 of 10. So not a color blast that Anthony wanted, but maybe you'll take a gold to start off. Maybe. Kareem Hum. We actually hit the Brady today, DB. I don't know if the Messi is still there. Was that one of the last remaining cards too? Chad Johnson. So we got Gerard Dokes to 75. AJ Brown to 249. Ty Law for the Patriots. Logan Thomas. Oh, the Messi was the edge. I wonder what hits are we missing? We only have two cases left. What are we missing guys? Probably get another one of those done tomorrow. Michael Thomas. Those kinds of things really stuck to each other. See that? James Conner. Freakin' Brock Lesnar. Isn't that so cool? This dude is like a legend. He's like in WWE prism, NFL prism, and UFC prism. Devonte Smith and Chaz Serrat for the Vikings. All out, Paddy Mahomes inserts. Trey Lance. Jameson Crowder. Yeah, I don't know what happened with those DBs. Someone was saying that, I think Harry said they weren't uploaded. I'm like, what the hell, man? I have to see why Joe didn't upload, though. See if I can try to find the videos now. Yeah, him and Roman Reigns, right? I think Roman Reigns tried out for the Jaguars. We have a Jerome Betis. Wow, Dan the Manmarino autograph. Very nice for the Dolphins. EA, solid. Bus, blue eyes. 299. Brandon Ayuk. Whoa, that is horrible centering. A little too much to the right. Demetric Felton for the Browns. It's 125. And Rashad Bateman, little RPA, for the Ravens Gunner and Bentley. We got Devin Singletary. DJ Charr Jr. And very nice. Actually, what a good last card of the break, or the box, I should say. Nice, a little better centering right there. Mac Jones. Little True Silver, that should sell well. Casey, but the Patriots straight up. There you go. It is Adam. It is. Blue Raspberry. Or is it blueberry or blue raspberry? I forgot which one it is, the flavor. It's delicious. It was, it came out actually in a show. It was Warnsap, which I believe the rock was actually the starter, but got injured and had to sit out most of the year. And then Warnsap took over. And then it really was downhill for the rock. I mean, Warnsap was like the guy and really didn't get to be a starter anymore. Which I believe too, Warnsap was like a converted tight end. I'm gonna say. I mean, very athletic guy actually. But I remember Warnsap being a legend there too though, but they kind of explained it in the rock show too. You know who won the Bourbon Bowl in the 90s, DB? Who came in halftime and came and saved the Bourbon Bowl? Whatever the saying is. Who won the Bourbon Bowl MVP? Chris Evans, 249. Hardy Nickerson. I mean, not, whoa, if it's Carson Wentz, but whoa, nice color. Oh, Wentz, you had a chance there in Indianapolis, but down the stretch did not work out for you. Sucks. But nice hit though. Little camel color match. Arthur with the Colts. Mike Jaspie is not in Japan. He probably just posted a photo when he went. He was literally just here like three hours ago. So unless he can teleport to Japan from Promosa Beach, he's definitely not there. Stephen Kendra got it. Coach Klan to 225. That's right, DB, now I remember. Yeah, I got into college football like right after I started living in the Eagles and started following the Ducks like when Dennis Dixon was there, like in 2004, 2005. Panay Suewell. Marquis Colston, but it's okay.  Me and Chad always go at it. It's fun times. But during high school, when I played football, I loved Jake Locker. We actually had the same colors as the Washington Huskies. We had gold helmets and our Vikings helmets was like purple, right? We had the Mountain View.  So we basically were like the Washington Husky colors. Lydania Tomlinson to 225. Kevin Byrd and a Davis Mills, silver. And then Marquis Colston's going to the Saints and Steven Fly as well. Robert Woods to 125. And also two guys, I have seen some really terrible quality control with the base cards. Thankfully it hasn't really affected the color cards, but as you can see, I don't know. Card feels complete, but it's like missing some pieces to it. So it's just the base cards though. I feel like it's been affected most. Mike Gisecchi to 99. And Tylen Walts, Baltimore Reds. It looks like it's dinged, right? It's definitely not dinged at all. It's just literally missing like color right there. All right, here we go. Cam Jordan to 249. Jordan Porter to 199. AD, is AD going to come back guys?  Or is he going to retire? I mean, he's made it clear that he doesn't need football anymore. He has his awards, he has a Super Bowl ring. He's a future Hall of Famer no matter what. I assume that he just wants to be the highest paid player in NFL history, right? For his position, I should say at least. That's Fitzpatrick to 99. And then we got a Jalen Hertz all out. Nice, that's awesome, man. Oregon actually plays Georgia this year in back to back years, which is going to be kind of fun and interesting. It might end up losing most likely. Georgia's a powerhouse school, but we did get their defensive coordinator as a fabulous coach. So we'll see if Dan does do well with us. So that should be fun though. All right, next one. Yeah, which I don't think he's that bad, but yeah, he's like a, definitely like a senior by now. He got like an extra eligibility due to COVID. What's his name again? Beau Nixon? He might do well.  I don't know if you guys remember Vernon Adams. I think he played like at East Washington, the Red Field School. He did great for Oregon. And he's having his career up there in the CFL, kind of like Jeremiah Mosoli is. But yeah, they've done pretty well with like transfer quarterbacks, but I mean, they hit a home run with Herbert and Marriota. I personally thought Vernon Adams was good enough to be in the NFL. He just had like that playmaking ability. Wasn't the biggest quarterback, wasn't the fastest, but you know, he can make plays though. He won the East West Shrine NFL, or the East West Shrine MVP, but I just don't think teams wanted to give him a chance like an NFL, so he's up there playing in the CFL now. But Jeremiah Mosoli, legendary Oregon quarterback. He's made a career out there actually in the CFL. All right, Trey Nixon. Oh, did he actually get to play with Cooper Cubs? Yeah, that's the same school that Cooper Cubs went to. I just remember them having that Red Field. Laramie Tunsel. Devonte Parker. Oh, and a purple power, George Kittle. Autograph, number to 49. For the 49ers going to Al Afonso. Eric Dickerson to 99. Tredavious White. Damn, did he really? That's crazy. Juju Smith Schuster, and Marcus May. Jeremy Shockley. Larry Rounder. Corey Littleton. Trey McKinney, 75, and Chad Johnson. That was one game. I think I remember that on the TV, but that was one game I remember watching with Vernon Adams, that year he was there with us. I think it was like Arizona State Curtis Martin in the 75. Like basically last minute till I tied the game, he's like threw it up like a prayer. And I forgot the name of the title and that caught it. Jay Tufelli. For the Jaguars. But that was such an amazing play. And then I just remember them like destroying like USC or UCLA, one of those two schools, Devonte Smith. I don't know, I personally just love it when they just beat like USC. I hear all the USC talk of like, oh, you know, we get all the top recruits and blah, blah, but yet they still don't win. Baker Mayfield. Let's see if it changes this year. Everybody's all upon them because of the coach that left Oklahoma, cause he knew that he was gonna get his butt kicked in the SEC. But I don't know, USC's overrated to me. You did Pizzle and guess who won Pizzle? Other case hit here potentially. I think so, yes, I think it is a case hit. No, not Rex.  Come on Pizzle, you gotta pay attention to the schedule, man. No, I was gonna say that spam account, but I forgot the name when it was called again. What was the spam account called again? Don't, don't download Tinder. I've only been to Eugene once and I drove through it. I was coming back from Canada and took a little family trip. I met my wife and her family up in Victoria, but we drove back down. So I went to Seattle, went to Portland, and then made a pit stop in Austin right there, or to see Austin Stadium star in Eugene. So much green grass everywhere, so different here than California. It was really nice and beautiful. But never been to a game out there, but I've been to plenty down here. Anytime I'd play USC, UCLA, I always pretty much go. I've been to like three Rose Bowl games. I went the most recent Rose Bowl game with Justin Herbert. I went to 2015 semi-finals Rose Bowl against Mr. Krablegs in Florida State, and then I went to the Rose Bowl game in 2011, I believe, when they beat Ohio State too. Or not Ohio State, they beat Wisconsin, I should say, sorry. Andre Reed, and a Devonte Smith, Silver. Kevin Smith with Maggles. Coral and Son. Yeah, I would like to experience the Oregon Dust game in Oregon and Eugene one day, but we'll see if I ever make my time. I usually, I don't really go up North at all for anything. Javon Holland, I usually go down South. CD-Lam. I thought that was a friggin' Mac Jones for a second, but it's Raimondry Stevenson, patch autograph. So it seems like there's been two in every case. And then we've got Shane Buscelli, it's a 60. That's awesome, man. You gotta see the Saints, Washington, RJ's first start, nice. AD, Aaron Donnell. Whoa, excuse me, sorry about that. Tony Rommel, some of the cards sometimes get stuck. All right, next half here. Carson Wentz to 225. We got LT Chargers, Zach Cunningham, Kyle Vannoi, Racy McMaff, 249, Stefan Diggs, Mac Jones, we got Derek Barnett, out of 149, and a very nice emergent, Zach Wilson, at number 19 out of 99 for the Jets and Grant. Austin Eckler with a Jason Tatum. I'm not Jason Tatum, why'd I say that? Jason Taylor, I don't know why I said Tatum for, I just caught myself right now. Jason Tatum for the Dolphins, EA. Hell, Jason, thinking of basketball right now. Austin Eckler to 125, Mac Jones, and a Jeremy Shockey, yeah. I am a little bit Michael, nah, just joking. That happened there once in a while. Ducks play Hawaii in 2024, nice. Two more boxes, guys, two more boxes. They played title of a title, yeah, probably not. Probably not. How about those Celtics though yesterday, man? I wasn't watching the game, I've seen the highlights. Man, they were losing by like 15 points plus, and then just come back and destroy it. Don't miss. Are you and Adam nice, man? It was a very cheap game, isn't it? And should be a good game. The Eagles game I'll probably go to this year only, it's probably gonna be Arizona. Yeah, unbelievable, right? Like, I couldn't believe the stats. Like, they were down by like 15, 16 points, whatever it was, like, with a minute left in the third, and I was like, damn. But the fact that they scored 40, unbelievable, it's crazy. Yeah, I think a lot of us did, right? I think a lot of people were like, man, Steph is just six threes already, 20 plus points in the first, he's gonna go for 60. But see, that's the one thing, what the war is, is that you live and die with those shots, and especially the threes, like, there are a lot of games that the warriors lose when they kind of go cold. I mean, start off hot, right? But, I don't know. I think that was like the biggest shock. I think they were so surprised that that happened. I mean, you don't expect to score that many points in a quarter, but that's also because you're like, literally making every single shot, right? Yeah, exactly. So that's, yeah. It'd be amazing if like, every team like scored like 75% of their points and shots. We'd have like 140, 150 like point games like every game, but a lot of missed shots throughout the, all the teams throughout the game. Ramon J. Stevenson to 249. I also seen yesterday too, guys, is Phil Knight and Dodger's co-owner, make a bid to purchase the Portland Trailblazers to almost likely keep them in Portland. That should be interesting. The Vonte Parker. Does Paul Allen want to like, potentially like, get the Seattle team? I mean, does the Seattle team potentially already have an ownership if they become a team, an expansion team? Vonte Fowler. I mean, it makes sense. Yeah, Marino. Vonte Fowler. Very nice, Pat Tillman Silver. The metric Felton. 225 for the Browns. All out, Patrick Mahomes insert. No offense. Austin Eckler. Oh, that's right. He did pass away, right? Wait, am I thinking of the right guy? Yeah, right? You got the ones at Seahawks? Kellan Mond. So no matter what, it's gonna happen. Yeah, but maybe they don't have to sell yet, right? That's the whole point. Des Fitzpatrick, nice little color match right here. For the Titans, Tennessee Titans, Arthur Hackett, 13 out of 25. And Bradley Chubb. Wow, we got a Brock Lesnar numbered card. Vikings, it's going to Brandon. Seven out of 175. Trey Lantz. Jermar Chase. 225 Mike Gasecchi. Panay Suel Silver. All right, last stack right here and then we'll go to the last box. And Lavante David. Purple Power to 49. That's interesting. Oh, this packet literally had less than 12 cards. It feels like, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure. That's all good, that's all good. I just know things that go around here in LA so I'm kind of the same way. I don't listen to the radio so much, but Twitter is where I get all my information. All right, last box guys, good luck. Let's see what we can find here. Trey McKitty to 15. Devin Bush, Justin Fields. Darius Leonard to 225. Thurman Thomas, for sure. And this is his chance to actually like own a basketball team too, basically. I don't know if that was like on a bucket list for him. The fact that there's an opportunity because I feel like anybody that loves sports and would love to be an owner will be jumping all over this, right? But not really often when a team gets put up for sale, especially with American sports here now. No, great. James Robinson to 99. Our last stack here, should have some autos here. See a blue Camel I think it looked like. Another little bit of a teaser, James Robinson. Whoa, whoa, all right. Let me put that down right there. 24 to 25, James Robinson, blue Camel. And back to back Jaguar's Trevor Lawrence Green Scope. That's what we were looking for. Four out of 75, Jaguar's bought straight up Jesse. That's more like it right there. I don't think this is a chip. I don't know if you can see that right there. I think it's like an extra piece of like cardboard. So I feel like you can kind of like take that out with like a tweezer or something. Cause it doesn't seem chip to me. It's like an extra piece. You guys can see that, but just point that out right there just in case. Trey Lance, Anna Jonathan Taylor for the Indian Miss Poults. Yeah, I usually don't pull too much teal. I've been more of a Mac Jones kind of magnet, but I don't mind.  Ooh, Davis Mills, nice purple color right there. Houston Texans, that is a Sean Matic. And then Tutu Awa for the Rams. Nice way to end the last boxer though. So I think it felt like we were looking for a bigger hit. So maybe on average, I guess that's what they say, right? On average for color, for stained glass, unless it is hiding right here, but we didn't get one in this case it looks like. Anthony Barr, Jeffrey Simons, Jaylin Phillips to 225. Last stack right here, looks like just a red. Hayden Hurst to 149. All right, well, there you go, guys. Nice little way to end off the last six box, half case break of prison there with a little tealol. But here were more of the bigger colors and names there. Little Davis Mills, Brock Lesnar, Chubb Otter, Grab Desk with Patrick, Kellan Mond, Jason Taylor, Merjan Zach Wilson, Ramon Drew-Stevenson, Devon Tessmiths, Silver Twofeli, Smith Hyper, George Kittle, Davis Mills, Silver Mark, Colston McJones, Silver, Richard Bateman, Dan Marino, and Kareem Hunt. So there you go. Not too shabby there at the end. So again, picker team number three is in a team filler. I have 17 orders to go through Jesus. So I don't know if number three sold out. If it did, we'll do that after, well actually we'd probably do that next. It doesn't look like random team number four sold out. So it looks like we have one left straight up and then 14 left, pretty much almost halfway there in the pack filler. So yeah, maybe picker team number three will be coming up next. And then we're halfway through the last three boxes of random teams of football prisms. So let's definitely get that going. Jaspies, casebreaks.com, guys, appreciate it.


Hello, everyone. Welcome to this talk. Today I'm going to talk about computational hardness of optimal fair computation beyond mini-crypt. This is a joint work with Hamata-Machi. So in this talk, we will be talking about coin tossing protocols. So a coin tossing protocol is a two-party interactive protocol between Alice and Bob. We assume that parties exchange a total of R messages. And we assume that parties always agree on the output when the protocol ends. So fair coin tossing considered the following setting, where a malicious party may prematurely abort the execution of the protocol. So the fairness guarantees that the honest party should always receive the output of the protocol. Therefore, when the malicious party abort, the honest party should still output a defense as his output of the protocol. The unfairness is defined as how much a malicious party can deviate the expected output of the honest party. So let me first summarize the state of the Archer result through the lens of Impecliazo's five words. So Impecliazo proposed his famous five words by based on what hardness of computation is true and what hardness of computational assumption is false. So for example, in Pasiland, Pasiland is a world where even one with functions do not exist. And a mini-crypt is a world where one function and henceforth all the symmetric primitives such as commitment schemes exist, but public key primitives do not exist. And finally, cryptomania is the world where all the primitives such as public key encryption and oblivious transfers exist. So firstly, a two-party coin tossing protocol can be think of as a two-party zero sum game. Hence, information theoretically, there exists an attacker that imposes constant unfairness. And in his celebrated work, Papadimitriou showed that finding such attacks is piece-based complete. However, Heitner and Omri show that if one function do not exist, then you can simulate such attacks reasonably well and still achieve constant unfairness. If we consider a type of adversary called fail-stop adversaries, so such adversaries behave honestly during the execution of the protocol and their only malicious behavior is to prematurely abort. So in this groundbreaking result work by Cleveland impact Beato, they show that even for the fail-stop adversary, one can impose a one-by-square of our unfairness. So intuitively, their result can be think of as a reverse theorem for a zoomers inequality, where if you have a martingale that goes from half to zero and one, there must exist a step where the jump in the expected output is at least the one-averse root of R. So in 1980s, after a sequence of important works, we have constructed this protocol, namely the majority protocol, where we know that for majority protocols is one-by-R unfair against the fail-stop adversaries. So majority protocol matches the lower bound proven by Cleveland impact Beato. And if you assume one of the functions exist, then you can use commitment schemes to upgrade such protocols to be secure against the fully-fledged adversaries. So in another celebrate work by Cleave, he showed that any coin tossing protocol is at least one-over-R unfair. So Cleave's result is very strong in the sense that regardless of what computational assumption you assume, any coin tossing protocol is at least one-over-R unfair. So one-over-R unfair coin tossing protocol is called optimal fair coin tossing. So for a long time, we do not know whether optimal fair coin tossing exists or not. And it is surprising when Moran, Nao, and Suki finally show that by relying on oblivious transfer, you do can construct a optimal fair coin tossing. And finally, very recently, our Crypto20 work showed that any optimal coin tossing protocol using one-over-function in a black box manner is at least one-over-R unfair. So let me now color-coded this table into green colors and red colors. So here, all the green constructions in the green colors are those protocols that are one-by-root R unfair, and also the adversarial attacks are those adversaries that can impose a one-over-root R unfairness. On the other hand, the red cell here MNS protocol is a protocol that achieves one-over-R unfairness, and the cleaver attack is also an attack that imposes one-over-R unfairness. So given this state-of-the-art result, it is a natural question to ask whether oblivious transfer is necessary for optimal fair coin tossing. So for example, can we construct one-over-R unfair coin tossing by relying on public key encryption? Also, it is another natural question to ask, does there exist fair coin tossing with intermediate unfairness? For example, maybe relying on public key encryption, we can find a coin tossing protocol that achieves one-over-R to the three-over-four unfairness, which is strictly between one-over-R and one-over-root R. So in this work, we rule out such possibilities. So firstly, we show that any coin tossing protocol that uses public key encryption in a black box-backed manner is at least one-over-root R unfair. And additionally, we consider the setting where parties not only have public key encryption, but they also have access to a trusted party that realizing some functionality, possibly randomized functionality F. So this is namely the F hybrid model. So we've showed that even given F hybrid, we're assuming that this F hybrid does not facilitate oblivious transfer, then even this protocol, coin tossing protocol, is at least one-over-root R unfair. So we completely squeeze out all the room here, possibility that to construct a fair coin tossing protocol by relying on other assumptions. So note that this F hybrid could be potentially useful for achieving various tasks. Here we are showing that F hybrid is completely useless for the task of fair coin tossing. So what I have shown you here might trick you into believing that we have resolved everything. Well, we haven't. So before I will go further, let me stress what are the open problems that we did not prove. So for example, one thing that we did not prove is that we did not present a set of oracles relative to which a secure protocol for F exists, but optimal fair coin tossing protocol does not exist relative to this set of oracles. So in other words, we did not prove a black box separation between securely realizing F and optimal fair coin tossing. We are only giving parties access to a trusted party realizing F. So the difference between these two settings is that when party are given access to a set of oracle that facilitates function F, they might not use this set of oracles in ways. They might not use it only to evaluate F. They might use this set of oracles in other ways. So this is why this problem is very challenging and we did not prove this. Let me stress that if one does prove such a black box separation, then it implies a black box separation between securely realizing an incomplete functionality F and oblivious transfer. This is one of the major open problems in the field, and it's incredibly challenging. So what we prove in this work can be seen as a partial progress towards this automated goal. Finally, let me compare our work with a relevant work by Hattner, Omri, Hattner, McCray, Yannis and Omri. They prove that for any constant R, the existence of R coin tossing protocol with unfairness less than 1 over root R implies the existence of key agreement protocols. So their result is incomparable to ours as they prove a stronger consequence, but only for constant round protocols. So now let me set up our model, tell you what our model is. So in our work, we define a set of oracles O that facilitates public key encryption. That is, and Bob have oracles that access to this oracle O, and additionally, they have access to a trusted party, realizing F, so they can send their respective input X and Y to the trusted party, and then receive the evaluation from from the trusted party. It is important to note that this function F is realized unfairly. So that means the adversary gets to receive the output first, and then he may abort the protocol after receiving the output. And by doing so he blocks the output delivery to the honest party. So the reason why we assume this F is realized unfair is because if you are given a fair access to a fair functionality F, then perfectly fair coin tossing is possible. So for example, assuming this F is the functionality X or now consider this very simple protocol, where Alice just sample her input randomly. And Bob also sample sample his input randomly, they just send their input X and Y to the trusted party, and receive the output as received output from the trusted party and output it as the output of the protocol. You can prove that this protocol is perfectly fair. So therefore, we assume this F is always realized unfairly. So given this model, what we prove is that there exists a fair stop adversary, who could deviate the expected output of the honest a party by one over root R. And this adversary ask at most upon normally additional queries to their random to the or to Oracle. So our proof follows largely from the prior works of margin one. 2020, where in in that work, we show we present a fair stop attacker that deviate the expected output of honest party by one over root R for any coin tossing in the random Oracle model. So what we observe in this work is that we note their attacker generalizes to other settings, as long as one can ensure the following invariant. So this invariant is that if if we have that Edison Bob's private view are always close to independent condition on the partial transcript. As long as this invariant always hold during the execution of the protocol, then their fair stop attacker will always work. So for example, in the random Oracle model, they ensure this invariant by relying on the well known technique called heavy career in the random Oracle. So our separation from public key encryption relies on this result from Muhammad E. Marji and Prabhakar Prabhakaran from TCC 2014. In this work, they define a set of Oracle that facilitates PKE. And they show that for any two party interactive protocol between Edison Bob, there is a what they call a common common information learner that ask a polynomial many queries to ensure that Edison Bob's private view are close to independent. So their results together with the attacker from Marji and the one 2020 ensures that gives the result that any coin tossing protocol that uses public key encryption in a black box manner is at least the one that will route our unfair. So finally, we prove this dichotomy result for F hybrid. So given any randomized functionality F, one can ask the following question, does F hybrid facilitate oblivious transfer or not. So if the answer is yes, then such functionalities are called complete functionalities. And since you can implement OT in F hybrid, then you can implement the M&S protocol. Recall that M&S protocol is a protocol that is optimally fair by relying on oblivious transfer, then with access to the F hybrid that facilitated OT, one can achieve optimal fair coin tossing in the F hybrid model. On the other hand, if the answer to this question is no, that means F run this functionality F is incomplete. Then, by this beautiful work of Kilian, who showed that who gives such a characterization that for any such incomplete functionality F, condition on the partial view, a condition on the partial transcript, Edison Bob's private view are always independent. Then the invariant always hold and hence the margin of one's attacker will therefore work. So any coin tossing protocol in F hybrid where F is incomplete is at least one the worst growth of our unfair. So therefore in F hybrid, there are only two possibilities where F is complete, then optimal fair coin tossing protocol exists. Or if F is incomplete, then F hybrid is completely useless for the task of fair coin tossing. So let me provide you some additional perspective on why this result could be technically challenging. So for an incomplete functionality F, there could be two possibilities. First, there might exist a T round secure protocol for F. Then you might want to replace this F hybrid with this T round protocol that realizes F. However, once you replace this one round access to F hybrid with a T round secure protocol, then the round complexity of the protocol get blow up by a factor of T. Hence, just to rule out a fair, just to rule out optimal fair coin tossing in the plain model is not and is not sufficient to prove that F hybrid optimal fair coin tossing is impossible in the F hybrid model where F might have a T round secure protocol. On the other hand, this in for an incomplete functionality F, there might not exist a security secure protocol for F.  For example, Rosalek and Shirley show that F hybrid could be useful to securely realizing some other functionality G. And here for the task of coin tossing for fair coin tossing, we show that F hybrid is completely useless. So with that, I'd like to conclude my talk here, and I will refer you to the full version of our paper for more details. Thank you.


Hello, everyone, and welcome to Think Tech Hawaii on this show day. It's Thursday, July 29, 2021. You're watching America Finding Its Way, and I'm your host Stephanie Stoll Dalton. Our show today is the topic to review this week's proceedings of the select committee investigation into this January 6 attack on the Capitol. On Tuesday, the first day, we know the House Republicans called the committee a sham and a political charade. And then the Republican leaders and the rest of them too ignored the proceedings entirely and met in closed session to plan punishment for the Republican committee members recently added. They missed the police officer's harrowing testimony, which was the first item up on the agenda of the committee. And they missed it entirely for the whole about the January 6 assault. So we want to talk about whether that committee is proceeding in ways that are most effective since there's been so much planning and attempt to have this begin to get to what we need to know. And it's the only way we're going to get to need to know because everything else is coming up against that. So what I'd like to ask is the first question. And before that, I'd like to welcome everybody and recognize this committee of itself and this forum. So I'd like to welcome Jay Fidel and also Tim Appichella. And thank you Cynthia Sinclair, Cynthia Lee Sinclair is here too and also Winston Welch. So for our first question, Jay, let's go with was it very effective? Do you think it was effective to have the police officers testify first in the committee agenda?  You know, you put the police on there and they make remarks that are very emotional. And they try to take you there, put you there in the room. And Kinsler was actually wiping his eyes a lot of the others were too. And I was impressed with that from the point of theater. But it's only it's only setting the stage really they got to get on probably the, you know, the best preliminary statement. I mean, there were others too that were good, but was Cheney Cheney Cheney was remarkable. I almost forgot she was a Republican. She was she was fabulous. And she articulated what she wanted to know about. And those are pretty much the things that I would like to know about. And we already know what happened and how the police were beat up. We know that. What we really don't know is how this all came together. And that would be something the FBI would know something about. The committee itself can learn about that by subpoenaing the right people and asking the right questions. You know, before I volunteered to be on this committee, but they didn't answer me. Now I'm volunteering to be a staffer because the staffers are the ones who are going to find out what's going on. They're going to find out who the real witnesses are. They're going to find out the people who will tell the truth. I think what's interesting is we know, don't we all of us here today, we know that there were congressmen and senators who were complicit in this insurrection. They knew about it. They were connected with it. They God knows the level of their participation planning involvement with it. And the question is, what happens, they're trying to protect themselves obviously now. They're distracting us in every way possible, calling Nancy Pelosi names, what have you. But the reality is, I think they're afraid of being called. And I think that when they are called, I hope they are called, all of them, all of the ones whose names have come up, which is probably a fair number of people. What will they do? Will they distract by running away, by saying it's all a witch hunt? Will they distract by disappearing or going, taking themselves to the hospital?  Will they somehow get into a confrontation? Will they bring in their friends as in the first impeachment to stand in the lobby and complain about due process? There are 50 things you could think of that they could do to try to derail this committee. And I think they will do a number of them. And it would be difficult to make an orderly investigation that way. So the investigators and especially the staffers have to figure out how they're going to get to the points that Liz Cheney was asking about, namely, how did this come together? Who was involved? Why? What were the social and political considerations? What were the economic considerations? Who paid?  We need to know that, and we're not going to know that by listening to the police who we already really heard from. Well, that's the very good analysis of it. And there have been various comments about the brilliancy of having the police officers testify early to get to know what it is that happened. But that's from their point of view. But you're also bringing up Liz Cheney's speech and what she said, the purpose of the work was to be and addressing all of those points that you made. And the the officers in their comments, I'd like to know you if you all have additional ones about how important they were. We know Liz Cheney's were. Her speech was tantamount to the pledge of allegiance. And I believe it should be memorized in the same way by all schoolchildren as we have known other important speeches like other Abraham Lincoln, a non-girl dressed. But I wanted to ask you all if you agreed that one of the most important statements, and this is what Jay prefaced, is that his comment, Officer Dunn, he was asking and begging almost the committee to go beyond the attackers and to find out who is the hip man. So tell me how you felt about that piece of their presentation. Tim, what do you think about that? And what else did you hear that was really seminal to this process from them? Thank you. Good morning, Stephanie. Hey, what was seminal for me was the comments from the police refuting the notion that these those individuals that attack the Capitol were really disantifa people in MAGA haves. We got specific testimony that these were racist charged attacks. The African American Capitol police were the targets of their racial rants. And pretty much showed without a shadow of a doubt that these were not people incognito attacking our own Capitol and our Capitol police trying to get at the congressman, trying to stop a political process. The certification of the Electoral College votes. That's now been dispelled 100 percent. So let's move on to the next thing. And that is who ultimately is responsible for this. And I think what came out of the testimony of those police officers was that again, the chance, the chance from all those saying, Donald Trump sent us here, we are here on his authority. Therefore, we're not trespassing. And I don't think that's going to hold up in the Department of Justice or the FBI, but that's their story and they're sticking to it. So I thought that was another very important part that was brought up in this testimony is that that's not going to wash. It's not going to work.  And try again. So so Cynthia, do you agree with that? Or can you put a little more paint, a little more information in there about what was important in the officer's testimony that reached the high criteria this committee needs to have for this investigation? I go along with the spirit of what he was saying and where he was going with it. And I think he sort of lost it when he went back to the focus on the hitman. I thought that he was sort of presenting his case of the hitman were the people that were doing the insurrection. But the person who hired the hitman is the one we need to know about. But then he got lost and then he referred to the person that was doing the hiring as the hitman. And so it got confused. So I think his his message got a little muddled in there. And so now everybody's going with that. Yeah, we got to find the hitman. I kind of and maybe it was just me and I was misunderstanding where he was going with it, but it sounded to me like we already know who the hitmen are, right?  And I think that was the point he was trying to make. But then he sort of reverted back and said, and then at the last minute, he said hitman. So that's what everybody sort of grabbed on to. So that was one of the things that that struck me. One of the things that that really got me was when I can't remember his name now, Akalino Ghanel, Officer Ghanel, that's what it was, Officer Ghanel. When he was talking about how when he was in Iraq, he, you know, hand to hand combat was not something he ever really had to do and and isn't really a part of the warfare in that sense that he was involved with. You know, all of his deployment, he never experienced something like what he experienced on that day. And here it was Americans that were attacking him, you know, and and he was fighting for his life and they all were. And they were fighting to try to protect Congress. And and that, to me, makes them heroes and anything that is said about them in any other way to me is just nonsense because they saved democracy. They did by their bravery and holding the line the way they did. They they kept the, you know, attackers at bay long enough to get the people away and to get them safe because it's obvious what their intentions were. And so to me, the fact that the Republicans voted not to give those guys the medal just really makes me angry. And I'm not usually angry at the Republicans. I just think they're idiots, but I don't get mad at them like this. I'm I'm angry at the Republicans for treating the Capitol Police the way they did. But I also hear that in Congress, they just passed something today. There was a vote to give them more money. So at least the Capitol Police get more funding. Well, really good point, because just a little while ago, they announced that the two point one billion bill that's for Capitol Hill security protection. And some of that's going to be used for other other topics, to other issues, too. But anyhow, they're getting they're getting what they asked for. So that that was very satisfying to know that they did that work today because it's so so infrequent that we get to see them work and produce what they're asked to do by the people. But Winston, with all of this said about the value of their commentary and their being first, taking priority, that the the feedback to them has been so utterly difficult to understand why the mocking, for example, would occur. For these people, when everything we're talking about here is heroic and tremendous effort. And yet on Fox News, the the the police officers have been called crisis actors. And as you probably know, and I've seen some of the shows on Fox have awarded them the Academy Award and some other acting awards. What do you what do you think that means? It's it's it is disgraceful. It's just like Officer Fanon said when he pounded his fist on the table. I think that was not an act. That was his real emotion about what they went through. And, you know, he says that the disrespect shown to his colleagues was disgraceful. And I think that's exactly right. When you hear that these officers, you know, they're comparing this to worse than they than they had felt in war, that these were own Americans that were assaulting them. And it's right. How do we how do how do you want to join, you know, a force to protect the, you know, the hallowed grounds of the of the US Capitol when you're being mocked on Fox News or even by by people that that are trying to pretend this was an ordinary day of of loving tourism. And tourists visiting the Capitol. So, you know, I think that it doesn't matter how it's spun. Let's I think that the what we can focus on is what the the chair of the committee said, Benny Thompson, he says, as chair, I will not give the lie any fertile ground of the rioters who tried to rob us of our democracy and they were propelled by that lie. You need to understand how and why the big life festered. And I think that's exactly it. Liz Cheney, you know what? She's she's right. She's she stood up and she says, what's more important to that? Do we do we hate our political adversaries more or do we love America more? I mean, at the end of the day, we need to we need to just be Americans about this. And I was watching an interesting movie. It was with of it was the fellow who negotiated Gary France's powers returned to America during the Cold War when his plane was shot down and it was just came out. It looks like last year and the actor portraying it is who's a fellow that had forced up Tom Hanks and he says and and and the judge in the case says, this guy is a spy. You can't don't don't give him any any defense and and it's a done deal. And the the government's trying to say the same thing. And and they're trying to put pressure on the lawyer who's they're arguably a very difficult case. I mean, the fellow was a spy and and all of that. But he says, you know, the difference between you and me. He says a lot that the fellow that was trying to say, hey, you got to sweep this one under the rug.  Mine is, you know, Italian. It was, you know, whatever it was. And he says you come from German stock. I come from Italian stock, but we're both Americans. He says, you know, the difference is the only thing that unites us. The only thing that unites us is is the rule and that we believe in this rule and the rule is called the Constitution and everything flows from that and everything flows from our belief in upholding the laws and our responsibility to this nation. And I think that as Liz Cheney says, if those who are responsible do not act, then it is a cancer on the nation. And our constitutional republic and it will undermine the peaceful transfer of power at our heart for the democratic system. So I think we need to just not give these other folks oxygen. We just need to continue to promote the truth as best as we can because the trash will be out there. We don't need to give it any more, any more airtime. What we need to do collectively as a country is just say this did happen. This is not fake. This was real. These people were damaged. They're very brave for sitting up before Congress. I mean, one of them got some sort of death threats during his testimony. Mr. Officer Fanoni, I think. So, you know, these are real people with real stories that defended our very democracy. And if it weren't for them, we might be living in a very different condition right now. Well, it's not over yet. We are perhaps still facing that that hopefully it's a little bit more distant. Stephanie, could I jump in for a minute? I mean, the big lie out. Yes, yes, certainly. Thank you because, you know, I found it highly offensive that they're a member of Congress trying to label these these brave officers as actors. But it shouldn't surprise any of us because what does a good defense attorney do with a credible witness? They tried to undermine them. They try to undermine their credibility. And in this case, it's name calling them suggesting that they are paid actors. But it's despicable. So that's all I wanted to say. Thank you. That's very of a good point.  And is this committee?   So, you know, Jay, what about that? Also, I mean, and that in relation to the fact that the Republicans are often their caucuses now threatening or were during this week, threatening to propose punishment for Liz Cheney and for Adam Zingenjer. And through these rule changes, they're going to make to disallow any community assignments with the Democrats and recommending or making possible expulsion from every honorific or position that they have on these other committees. So are they able to do that with impunity? And what does that have to do with the big lie? Is that a big effort to support the continue to grow the big lie? It's theater. So much of this is theater and it shouldn't be. We have to resist that to a certain extent.  But and regrettably, you know, the television cameras there and the media there. This is really a hearing for the public. But the bottom line, which is we never forget, is one of the facts, man, what happened here? Not not what the theater is and not what the distractions are. Republicans are going to do all kinds of distractions, 50 things. They're only they're only beginning the distractions. But you know, these guys, the committee and their staffers, they have to put their heads down. They have to be investigators. They have to find out what happened. And sure, they got to keep a public face. They got to show that they mean what they say and they say what they mean. But they have to give us a report that's authoritative and detailed and gets the points we want to know about.  They have to ignore that. This is going to be the big challenge. And so to the extent we follow this, we should follow what they are learning. We should follow who they are talking to about the facts. So I think it's going to be a lot of distraction, actually on both sides, because this is theater for the public. But I think the real deal here is what they learn. Well, you know, I think that that kind of bridges over Tim, to what you saw Geraldo Rivera doing. Can you tell us a little bit about that?  I mean, he finally is standing up and say, no, this is not true. And again, he's taking great risk because, as I said in many other shows, there's great risk for any person to step outside the boundaries of what Donald Trump wants everyone to say and believe. Once you're outside the tribe, the herd, you are now in no man's land and you're now subject to ridicule, ostrich to be ostracized, great risk.  And now maybe he's starting to get his chops back and he's standing up to what is the obvious reality of the situation versus the contrived mandated reality that they're being told to follow. And so he's he's a break in the feline. He's, you know, he's he's the puka in a line that's starting to maybe crumble and that's significant. If it comes from different areas like Liz Cheney, Adam Kingsinger, other other media folks, it all starts to accumulate and it all starts to gather inertia. And sooner or later, everyone's embarrassed to defend the big lie. And now there then you'll see a correlation to the inability to defend the big lie and the breakaway from Donald Trump. We'll see. Well, that's the break comes forward. OK, but what did you think about Haraldo as he said the truth about this is about what the president did and this is about what McCarthy said and what Mitch said and all of them said this in the days after. And now it's all different and it's not true. And as he was going, he I was worried because he was being he was being talked over and he was being told that he was wrong and ridiculed and they just derided him all through his talk. Let me let me address that, because what do you say about an individual like Liz Cheney, which I rarely agree with anything she, you know, her position on politics, rarely agree with most of it? What do you say about Adam Kingsinger, who is willing to sacrifice his political career, Liz Cheney, sacrifice her political career? Rivera to sacrifice his future career in TV and the media. It's an act of patriotism, I think. It's an act of knowing where the chips lie. And it's the act of courage. That's the definition of courage is to know that ultimately you're going to be castigated as a trader, the foe and just disloyal to Donald Trump and the GOP way of life. But you do it anyway because for Liz Cheney, she said, I'm doing it for my oath. I'm not doing this for my political career. And Adam Kingsinger says political career be damned. I have to stand up for what I know is true. And that is to follow the Constitution and get to the heart of this matter. And I think they're patriots. I do. And again, I don't probably agree with any of them. But I see I see within themselves that which is the most important adherence to the rule of law and the Constitution and what keeps this democracy together. And God bless them. But Stephanie, can I add something to that? You know, yes, there are signs the wall was crumbling, but they're anecdotal and they're only a handful of people. But basically, Mitch McConnell is still in charge. And we're going to see that. I think we're going to see that on the this thing with the infrastructure bill. Well, I want to add this, though. This is my my point is I I also tuned into maybe you guys made me do it. I also tuned into Fox News looking for signs of crumble, if you will. I didn't see any signs of crumble. I saw them lying immediately about everything. So don't don't get too excited here, because, you know, the right wing media is still right wing. Those guys are still lying to us by the car load. And it's not not entirely clear that anything is changing. Right. And that's why I thought the Haraldo scene was so informative because he did hold it together. But he's a pretty strong outspoken guy. He he started to fade. And I thought that was a little bit worrisome, but he never really did leave leave it. So I do think that we have to look for these little pieces to see if these are real cracks that are going to go anywhere. And so, yeah, so that's enough on Haraldo. But we thank you, Haraldo, for stating the truth, at least telling the truth. Now, one of the things I've recently discovered is that the Select Committee is only on for this Congress's period of time. So, Cynthia, do you think they can do everything in the time that they have remaining? Oh, if they add their staff member, if they double the number of their staff, maybe, you know, what's going to happen? We're going to see a lot of subpoenas go out. And every Republican that gets subpoena, we can already bet is going to fight it. We already know that they're going to drag their feet. They're going to drag it out. That's what they're going to do. So in my hope, what they're going to do is they're going to subpoena records, records, phone records, text messages, emails, every possible every possible time that somebody might have seen them talking to each other, even. I mean, everything, paper-wise. I want to see such a solid case on paper with, you know, hard physical evidence, long before we ever even try to get these guys in front of the commission to testify. Because maybe they won't lie to Congress. I don't know. I don't know if I believe that. I think they would. I don't think they believe in their oath enough that they would feel like they needed to tell the truth anywhere. So including Congress, sure that, you know, consequences are much more severe. But I think that they have this faith in Trump coming back and everybody getting, you know, pardoned and everything's going to go back to the power, you know, structure that they had before. For now, I mean, at least that's over for now. So Winston, what do you think about the committee? Is it going to be the one we need and are they going to be able to accomplish it in the time they have? Well, you know, they could take all the time in the world, but I think Liz Cheney and she says the public deserves testimony from every person with knowledge of planning and preparation for July 6th. We must also know what happened every minute of that day in the White House, every phone call, every conversation, every meeting leading up to during and after the attack. That's what's going to come out like Cynthia said, that supreme of the phone records, the text records, the email. Now, of course, a lot of those conversations are just conversations. They won't have been recorded in the written text. But, you know, as Geraldo, I don't know, Jay, I think Fox, OK, we can't expect a lot from Fox, but there's certain people I was shocked as to I didn't even know Geraldo was on Fox. But he's, you know, he says, I think you've been to Sean Gaslight and changing the subject. The subject is January 6th and what happened to the United States Capitol and why it happened. Those two things, the fact that the Capitol was targeted and the prime investigator, the one who unleashed the mob was the president of the United States, for God's sake, Sean. This was, you know, he wasn't allowed on by mistake. Fox is trying to appeal to those people that say, oh, well, Fox isn't just the parodying one line. I think that was just sort of a throwaway that, you know, and Sean Hannity's reputation didn't go down because of Geraldo Rivera in the minds of his viewers. So I think it's a little bit of theater, but he did stand up. Now, Liz Cheney, yeah, and so Liz Cheney, she's, I think she and Mr. Kissinger, maybe they will be form a core of the conservative traditional values party caucus inside of the Republican Party and have a breakaway that, or they become part of the conservative Democratic Party, I don't know. Like I said before, Liz Cheney, her seat is in Wyoming. I don't know how many, how blue Wyoming is, but I'm thinking it's not that blue. It's probably pretty red red. And Liz Cheney's got, if she's running against someone that's gonna be supported by supporter of the big lie, you know what, it's time to donate to Liz Cheney because it's better the devil, you know, than the one you definitely know is worse.  She's speaking truth to power. She may lose her committee assignments or whatever. So Joe Biden needs to say thank you for being an American. We're gonna step up and we're, I'm gonna ask every person who's a Democrat to donate money to your account for re-election if you don't outright switch and join our party, which may not be palatable for her, but what she and Mr. Kissinger are doing are very. I mean, in the leadership of the committee and that she's strong for that. And you know, we have Aloha time now. So we're gonna... Aloha time. Aloha time. Aloha time. Aloha time. Aloha time. Aloha time. Aloha time. It's always Aloha time here. Aloha time. Aloha time. Not always. Not always. So informative. So thank you to the panel and those on it who are, of course, Tim Apachello, Cynthia Leeson, Claire Winston, Welton, Jay Fiedell, and for this really critical conversation. I'm Stephanie Stoll Dalton, hosting for America Finding It's Way. We'll see you next week, same time, same day. Mahalo, everybody. Aloha. Aloha.


Hi Andrew, how did you originally get into running? So I got into, from quite an early age, I think I joined a local athletics club when I was about 10 or 11. I'm up in Caithness and I think really from there I just really enjoyed athletics, enjoyed being part of a club, the social aspect of it. I think once I finished university then I kind of began to take my training a bit more seriously and looking to get improved my kind of times and yeah and then I got called up for a Scotland vest and it's kind of just, it's got it from there really. You've run also to distances from 5Ks, park runs, 10Ks, marathons, actually the Avimo course record holder at the park run here. So what do you prefer, do you prefer the speed or the trails, the mountains? Yeah I've become a bit of jack of all trades in running, but yeah I enjoy the variety of it. I think with running sometimes they can become a bit monotonous if you just do the same thing over and over again. So I like to mix it up you know in the winter do a bit of road and cross country and in summer and enjoy the mountains and the trails. I think that's what I really get a kick out of is just kind of experiencing all those different aspects. Like sometimes you just kind of got the need for speed and you kind of just want to get out in the flat and on the track and just blast out a really kind of hard session. Sometimes you just want to have a really long run outside in the trails where you don't see anyone for miles and miles and you've just got kind of great scenery. Last year you hit height in mountain running and came fourth in the mountain running rankings. How did that feel for you? Yeah that was great, it's the first year that they introduced a world ranking system to mountain running which I think is a really great idea, it kind of gives a bit more context to the sport and it gives an individual athlete something to really fight for over the season. So yeah I was really happy to finish a season ranked fourth. I finished third overall in the World Cup series so I kind of accumulated enough ranking points to kind of be there and thereabouts and yeah I think going forward I'd hopefully I can sneak off a couple more places and maybe even one day get that top spot. That involved running abroad in a race called Sierra Zanal.  Yeah I love to travel and I love to experience different places, different cultures and running is a great way to do that. Whether it's through racing, whether it's through training, yeah you get to see some actually stunning places. But I think particular Sierra Zanal was an amazing race for me to do because it brought together the long distance mountain runners as well with the short distance and I've made for like a really competitive field and it's an absolutely stunning kind of part of the world. It was really beautiful. Sierra Zanal, that was part of the Golden Trail series which has got other races involved with it including Zagama and the Glencoe Skyline. Do you have any plans to take part in any of those races? It's certainly something I'm thinking about for this year because races tend to be a bit on the long side for what I'm doing just now with the mountain running in the European and World Championships they're usually over around about 10k distances so I like to keep my races relatively short for the most part but I think certainly there's room for going to the longer type races so it's something I'm keeping quite a fairly open mind about and I'll see if there's maybe a couple I can do this year I can persuade my coach. At what stage did you decide to get a coach and how has that impacted on your running? Me and Sophie started working together back in 2009 after I came back from a gap here in New Zealand and I just finished university I was at that stage in my running career I think I was a good club athlete but I hadn't quite made that step to international and that's really where I wanted to go so I started working alongside Sophie and she would give me sessions that would really challenge myself but she'd also be really good at giving me advice and when to hold back and I think it just kind of works really well as a partnership we've been through some really good times some really challenging times but I think we've built that kind of relationship where we both can talk to each other freely and we can both express our opinions and I think that's ultimately what you want from an athlete's coach relationship What does your nutrition look like? Is it a strict control diet or do you like to let go and eat some beers and burgers now? Yeah I think I'm not one for being absolutely strict on my nutrition I mean generally I think I do eat quite a balanced diet I like my meat veg, protein, everything everything I think that you would want for a kind of all-round runner's diet I think you've got to treat yourself every once in a while I'm kind of not afraid to do that but at the same time it's consistency it's always key with the kind of diet so you don't want to go too crazy too often It's nice and airy again How have you coped with injuries? Have you any long-term issues and how do you know when a niggle is more serious? I mean fortunately I've not really had I would say a major injury in my running career and that's probably the worst that's kind of happened is maybe a couple of stress fractures and a torn calf muscle but nothing has really kind of kept me out for more than two or three months I think what I try to do to kind of reduce the risk of injury is I do a bit of strength and conditioning and yoga as well It just kind of helps I think when you can build a solid core then it helps with your running economy and your stability I think with the mileage that you do and distance running injuries are almost inevitable but if you can do your most to reduce the risk of injury then you do whatever you can to do that What's been your most memorable race so far? and do you like to wrecky a course beforehand? My most memorable race yeah it's a toughy I think the one that I'm probably most proud of was when I ran the world mountain running championships in 2015 that was in Wales so it was like a home championships so that was great because you had a ton of support out on the course and it was fantastic to have people like waving flags that you're screaming at you and I personally had a really good run and so did my teammates as well and to be ended up winning a team bronze You're running pretty much every day Is motivation ever a problem for you? Yeah absolutely there's definitely some days when it can be for a variety of factors it can be the weather because it's really cold and wet and you don't really want to get outside other days you might be a bit fatigued because you've been heavy training week or even working and stuff as well if you've had a stressful day and you just kind of want to try and go home but I think like you know I've always tend to stick to a routine I think the big motivation is always you know you have to train if you want to perform at the level that you want to perform at so I think like you know I tend to always find a way to kind of motivate myself to get out which is kind of good yeah you always kind of try to remind yourself that yeah you always feel better for it at the end of the day At this moment last week for example what's a typical training week consist of how many days a week are you running what sort of distances are you doing? Yeah so at the moment I'm over a winter I'm kind of typically training like kind of twice a day most days I'll do around about kind of 90 to 100 miles a week and that'll be yeah kind of mixture of steady running there'll be an interval session in there as well track session a long run on a Sunday which can be between like 18 and 20 miles Do you have a favourite piece of kit what you go to shoe? Yeah I'll go with the kind of variety of shoes that I kind of wear with a kind of hook house and particularly when I'm out on the trails I like wearing the speed goats because they kind of give you that bit of extra comfort and support when you're out kind of hitting some of the harder kind of trails and also you can kind of get that bit of speed as well so I like to kind of tear it off a bit on the trails so it's nice when you have that bit of cushioning to that effect it's great Thanks very much for your time Andrew it's been a pleasure Great thank you very much


Unentertainment News, Spotify and online streaming platform has reared Nigeria as the second country with the most musical streams after Pakistan. Spotify head of music for Sub-Saharan Africa, Fierno Okumo, who disclosed this during a media chart in Lagos, said that the study was carried out by Spotify and that Kenyan rocked the third. She said that artists including Whiskey, Bonoboi, Temps and Mr. Ease is rather ranked amongst the top five exported local artists from Nigeria on Spotify. Please do subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.


A compound made of particles A, B and C forms CCP lattice forms CCP lattice in the lattice in the lattice ions A occupy in the lattice ion A occupy the lattice points ion A occupy the lattice points and ions B and C occupy alternate tetrahedral void alternate tetrahedral void if all the ions if all the ions along one body diagonal if all the ions along one body diagonal is removed along one body diagonal is removed then the formula of the compound is formula of the compound is did you understand the question alternate tetrahedral first of all what is the position of tetrahedral void location of tetrahedral void last class we have discussed of tetrahedral void present at the body diagonal okay how the tetrahedral void forms it forms by the combination of one cornered atom and three phase centered atom okay like this cornered atom this cornered atom this phase center this phase center and this phase center this whatever corner you can draw from this phase you can draw from this corner so in this cube we can draw three phase from this one is this another one is this another one is this right so this cornered atom is in contact with this phase center this phase center and this phase center all these four atoms are in contact so once you look at this structure this kind of question to find out the formula of the compound is very common you will get this question definitely in some of the examples okay so this cornered atom actually this cornered atom is in contact with a wall of phase the center you can a phase center or this corner so we can draw one more phase is this this phase center and we have one more phase here that is this phase center okay it does not look like silver but you take this I will just shift this here to make you understand this is there okay so this is the phase center one two and three okay this phase center atom one two and three it forms a triangle here these are all these are in contact okay and this is also contact in this three this one so here you see here we have a void over here this is tetrahedral okay so one diagonal is here not this point this is a poly diagonal so what tetrahedral void will be here another tetrahedral void will be somewhere here that is what we discussed last class that on a diagonal we have two tetrahedral void present okay and the tetrahedral void forms by one cornered atom and three adjacent phase center okay so on a poly diagonal we have two tetrahedral void and at the center what we have center to get out there octahedral void okay center we have octahedral void so what they what is the question the question is atom a forms what lattice point ccp lattice means what ccp means accession ccp of the same thing and a forms ccp lattice it means k present at cornered plus phase center right b and c presented alternate tetrahedral void this come over a poly diagonal pay we have b over here we have a c over okay or either be not okay b c means for a void diagonal we have one atom of b and one atom of c okay so how many v atoms are present in this lattice four because we have total how many right I don't avoid eight total and on the poly diagonal we have only one v atom and we have how many poly diagonals four poly diagonals so number of these four and number of c is also what right but all four b is not present in the lattice because the question is what this is what the number of a b and c what is the number of a will have here is again four corner means what eight into one by eight phase center means six into one by two this is four okay so number of a atom is four number of b is for number of c is four we have to find out the formula so if you with this particular you know question the formula is a b and c if nothing is removed then but what is the question we are removing all atoms along the body diagonal okay suppose a body diagonal here sk along do be atom our house will work right so have we removed atom a in this no okay okay corner and face center so it's a long remove for the door corner atom with a remote a each is what they're not going to be body diagonal k long concept of present squad okay so when you draw the poly diagonal we have two a atom one b and one c I was going to come then what is the formula of the compound so on my back right so we have removed two a atoms and that is present with the corner not at the face so you have to say a what is the number of a present in this that is out of eight corners to have been removed correct so what we what is that six and what is the contribution of one one by eight plus phase center means no change because we don't have eight a atom now it is only six corners which are occupied by atom a six into one by six into half because face center to remove three plus three by four which is something on 15 by four correct okay number of a atom is this b secret man a 15 by four a five when you get answers like this and both a and b are option you got it so it's not a question very common in this chapter you'll get this question definitely in any of the example okay so just you need to find out the effective number of atoms present you should know the position of void okay when the question says that atoms along the body diagonal have been removed then you should know what all atoms are present along the body diagonal so we have two cornered atoms two tetrahedral void and one octahedral void so whatever atoms are present in tetrahedral void and octahedral void that will be removed okay we'll find out the effective number of atoms a b and c and the issue of that with the common of the compound so I'll give a okay you got a question for this please go a compound is made up of particles a and b particles a and b a forms fcc packing b occupies all octahedral void b occupies all octahedral void if all the particles if all the particles along the plane shown in figure if all the particles along the plane shown in figure are removed then the simplest formula of the compound is this plane you see these two edges we are removing all the atoms present along this plane first of all you need to find out if a or b like I have told you not to take the reference of the classroom okay classroom plane you find out along that plane what all atoms are present okay all those atoms forms fcc and b presented octahedral void correct a fcc form okay b forms octahedral void it means because octahedral void presented all edge center and body center right so we'll write down here edge center and body center okay edge center and body center now what is this plane this edge and the bottom of the edge this plane you imagine okay this plane you imagine so this plane is going this way okay so what all atoms are coming so one body center two corner there two corner here and what edge also we have that edge in this edge and this face center also right so you don't know face center is well or a face center the level of face center and level of face center front wall or your back wall I don't know this plane passes through these two face center this body center two corners edge center edge center into corners okay so all these along this plane we are removing all the atoms I don't know let's see that okay so how many a we are removing how many corner a we are removing corner a two and two four right so we have only four corner a present four into one by eight how many face center we are removing two face center we are removing four into half okay how many edge center we are removing yes enter what center to a center we are removing et cetera contribution one by four so one by four into how many et center atom we have total left edge we have total total sorry we have 10 etch 10 et cetera total don't know and one body center we are removing it is five by two two or four okay and this is also five by two so answer okay was it tough only just you need to know keep just plain okay understood okay next question time a crystal is made up of particles x y and z x forms fcc x is fcc y occupies all octahedral void z occupies all detrahedral void if all the particles along one body diagonal are removed the formula of this x 3 y 2 z 4 option are not there x y z 2 x 2 y z 2 x 8 y 4 z 5 x 5 y 4 z 8 x 8 y 4 z 5 i don't know so c option is there okay what is the question x forms x forms fcc right so cornered to a space center or y forms octahedral octahedral void say octahedral void and z z detrahedral how many detrahedral voids are there eight so that was there eight i will do that octahedral void is ten four and what will happen four right so simple formula will happen other we don't remove anything and this is the formula okay but we have removed the atoms along the body diagonal means some look don't detrahedral void remove per thing right so here i guess six one octahedral void remove per thing three on the body diagonal here along carry move current no atoms two cornered atoms so six into one by eight plus six into half this is 15 by four so one says x 15 by four y 3 6 so it is x 5 y 4 z 8 so this kind of questions will get density relations questions also will get formula given you just you have to use the formula


The Surface Laptop Studio 2 keeps the previous 14.4-inch display, has some new bells and whistles though for $2,000 to start. It runs on Intel's i7-H Class 13th Gen chips. Pricier versions have an NVIDIA RTX 4050 or RTX 4060 GPU inside. All right, who's buying this? This one looks really cool. I always, I like the way that the monitor kind of flips down with the hinge system, like half of the monitor is the hinge system. That looked really slick too. Yeah, these are nice looking laptops. And it started at $2,000, which doesn't sound that bad. But when you start configuring these bad boys up, they can get expensive pretty quick.


morning runs are on didn't rain last night which is great so most of my exercise is from doing daily stuff right you know dig in moving rocks around cutting jungle whatever so why would I waste all this energy on morning exercise well it gets the motor running gets the get some momentum going shakes out all the stuff doesn't take me two hours to get moving it just gets everything going that's a great way to go


Hi, my name is Michael Kosser and welcome to this edition of the leaders room brought to you by the E. Cliff Leadership and Governance Center. Today we have with us Ms. Red Hong Yi, a Malaysian artist architect who is known as the artist who paints but without a paintbrush. After graduating university she worked for the Australian architectural firm Hassel in their Shanghai office. It was while living in Shanghai that she found her inspiration to create art in a highly unconventional manner using local everyday materials as her median. Her first artwork, a portrait of the artist Ai Wei Wei, was made up of sunflower seeds and it was done in an old residential alleyway. In January 2012, Red, using a basketball driveled in red paint, created a giant portrait of the basketball player Yo Ming. The process was captured on video, uploaded to the internet and went viral almost instantly. Several other videos of her artwork followed suit. Adele in tea lights, J. Chu in coffee cup stains and Mark Zuckerberg with paperbacks. Her unusual art and creativity has resulted in Red being featured in an alphabet of media such as ABC, NBC, CBC, NBC, CNN, ESPN, The Wall Street Journal, The Huffington Post, The Daily Mail, The Design Boom and, well, you get the idea. Join me in welcoming Red. So Red, welcome to the leader's room. Thank you. It's great being here. Oh, it's great having you here. I've got just a couple of quick questions that I'd like to ask you today and the first one is, you know, how you got into the spot you're in today and that is you're a trained architect. But yet somewhere along the line, you made this transition into becoming an artist. How did that happen? I guess art has always been a hobby of mine. I've always done it on the side. And but but this all this really happened about three or four years ago after I graduated from architecture and moved to China. I kept my daytime.  And on the side, I did art for fun, but I uploaded it on YouTube and Facebook and things like that. And I guess gradually people started to watch and share with share it with their friends and went out like that. And that that was really how it happened. It was just sharing my video online, sharing the video online. And so something that had just been a hobby. Suddenly became your full time application. Yeah. So I'm doing that full time right now. OK, well, great. So I'm sure you get asked this next question a lot. How did you come up with the idea of being an artist without a paintbrush? Well, I think I think when I went into architecture, I started I started playing around, I guess, experimenting with materials a lot instead of, I think, just sticking to, you know, your pencil and pen and all that sort of stuff. So I grew fascinated with materials and I think that changed the way I approached art after that. And when I moved to China, I just discovered that there was a lot of stuff I could buy in bulk over there for a very cheap price. So I decided to, I guess, experiment with all the materials and objects that I could find there. And that's I guess that's really how it started. OK, so the very first piece of art that you ever did was a portrait of Ai Weiwei and you use sunflower seeds. Yes. How did you come up with the idea for sunflower seeds? That's because my I guess my favorite piece that's done by Ai Weiwei is is titled Sunflower Seeds. So what he's what he did was he created a hundred million, I think, hand-painted porcelain sunflower seeds. And that was created by two thousand workers over the period of two years to I guess to I think that was to symbolize the mass producing power of China. And I thought that was that was pretty interesting and I wanted to draw that connection between, I guess, sunflower seeds and his portrait. I wanted there to be a connection with the material that I was using. So I went to my local sort of grocery shop and bought all the sunflower seeds I could find there and there were about seven kilos. And I made a portrait out of it. That's how it happened. And you've worked with such diverse materials as paperbacks, coffee cup stains. You've also used tea lights and sunflower seeds of all those different mediums. Do you have one that you like? Oh, and socks. I saw one where you did socks, too. Socks as well and tea bags lately as well. I don't know about my favorite material. I think I really enjoyed painting with coffee cup rings because I think it's it's a nuisance to see coffee cup rings on your table and all that. But it was fun to turn that into something, I guess, that was visually, I guess, different. So I guess what I like to do is really turn something really mundane and ordinary looking into something that's really unusual. So probably say coffee cup stain. Have you ever used the same medium twice? Yeah, probably have. I gave myself this challenge to make a series of 30 pieces of food art. I don't know if you saw those. No, I haven't seen that one. Oh, right. OK, so I go after this. Yeah, all right. That'd be great. I could send you a link. OK. So that was a challenge for me to downscale my art pieces because I think at one point you've got too complicated for me and I was exhausted. So I downscaled it to, I guess, the size of a dinner plate. And the challenge was to use the same materials, which was food for me over the period of a month and and to just, you know, share it with my followers, I guess, online followers every day. OK. Yeah. All right. Well, so what or who are the sources of your inspirations? Obviously, some artists. Yeah, but where do you get the inspiration? I guess if I had to, if I had to name a person, it would probably out of all the artists, I would say, probably Picasso, as cliche as that might sound. I think it's because I think that that he was one of the my mom kept a couple of his prints at home and she would tell me about, I guess, you know, how simple lines could depict a certain, I guess, image. And he has this quote that goes, all children are born artists. The problem is how to remain an artist once you grow up. And I think that quote has really stuck to me because I think as kids, you know, we try a range of different things. We're not afraid of taking risks. And when we're adults, you know, we sort of hold back a bit and fit in, try to conform. So so I guess he was a really big inspiration for me. OK. In your TED talk, the TEDx talk that you did here in KL, you close it by saying something to the fact and I'm paraphrasing here that when you made this transition to an artist, one of the things that you gave up and left behind was your fear. Yes. Yeah. Can you talk to us about that? Yeah, I can. Because with every project that I guess I embark on, there's a huge amount of fear that I feel all the time. I think generally I'm a bit of a shy person, you know, and I think it wasn't a natural thing for me to take risks like what I've done in the last couple of years.  So I think with how I've dealt with fear is that I've learned to accept that it's a natural part of being creative, that it would always be there and that I should acknowledge it and welcome it and dance with it and go, hey, because I'm fearful. I know I'm on the right path and I'm doing something different. OK, all right. So when you decide to work on any project, do you ever get stuck? And if you do, how do you deal with it? How do you get unstuck? All right, OK, I do get stuck all the time and I really think that's really part of the process. I think that's the beauty of being able to experiment and fail and finally come to a point where you go, oh, you know, light bulb is shining and you've gone through that. So I am a big believer in failing and making mistakes and learning from it until you succeed. So that happens for all my projects. Right at the start, there's a lot of mistakes that happen. OK, so when you're experiencing the fear and you're getting stuck, how do you keep yourself moving, though? And why I'm asking that question is at E-Cliff, one of the things that we tell leaders that come through our different workshop experiences is that there are two sources of sustainable leadership energy. One's values and one's sense of purpose and how they drive you forward. And so, you know, when you're in that stuck moment or when you're confronting that dark fear, what is it that you said that you embrace the fear? But what else drives you? Anything else? I think what, how I know that, how I know I'm really stuck is if I do not do anything about it. I think a lot of times I would really ruminate on an idea or a project and I would just, you know, drag it on and not do anything about it because it's so difficult. But what I've learned is that that anxiety of not starting something really paralyzes me. So I think a simple answer to it is to really force.  So if it's just a little piece each day, that's what starts to get the momentum for you. Yeah, that's a lot better than keeping it all in your head. So one of the things that I'm sure the people listening to and watching this leader room would be curious about is if they wanted to encourage creativity in their own people in the workplace, what are some lessons that they might be able to learn from you? I think if I would say that first of all, you have to really care about that project that you're putting out and you would have to be brave enough to break rules and challenge the status quo to come up with original ideas and do not be afraid of doing that and shaking things up and breaking things. That would be my advice. So don't be afraid to break the rules.  And I'm imagining also be confident in your own ability. Oh yeah, definitely. Okay, well, Red, I'd like to thank you for joining us today. Thank you for having me. This is Michael Kossler signing off from the leaders room brought to you by the Eclipse Leadership and Governance Center.


One potential Effect is on the association is that it may Stimulate us to rethink The notion of membership it's it's possible I say this with some hesitation being on the membership committee but it's possible that notions that Resulted in articulations like The future research library will be global in nature You know those if that's true if we really do believe that then I think that could very well have implications for how we think about membership there were Indications that some of what we what while the core of what we do will remember will remain probably Very much the same at least functionally There are going to be new things we do And we're going to do some of the things we've been doing differently as a consequence of which The the kinds of discussions that ARL fosters and The people it invites into those discussions Could end up changing and arguably should end up changing. I'm thinking for instance Clifford Lynch Has what what he refers to as the executive round table concept in CNI where? a CNI member Goes and takes with her someone who isn't a CNI member like a vice-chancellor for research or something like that I Wouldn't be surprised if the framework that emerges kind of pushes us a little bit in that direction of saying Okay, so at the next ARL meeting we're going to be talking about this and we're going to invite a bunch of CIOs in a bunch of faculty members in one of the things that really came out in our session was engagement with the faculty now You know Ellie. It's a faculty member. So it's not terribly surprising, but I I do think it could end up changing then The structure of and the participants in ARL discussions, and I think that would be interesting I think the association should be The vehicle through which the community can discuss plan and undertake collective action So that's where I believe this is going to be very important libraries and particularly research libraries and and the types of research libraries that are the constituency of ARL Are full of very very bright aware people and they they're doing fine in many cases on their own They do have lots of challenges facing them But but they're doing fine but but I think what I would like to see come out of this is some plans or or some Directions for planning for the kinds of collection the collective action that I believe will be very important across not just the community of Academic research libraries or other research libraries, but really all all libraries Right down to and collections right down to private collections or smaller Archives and historical collections. I think there is an ecosystem out there that is in need today of some thinking about what Not not just how they all solve their own individual problems Or maybe they're collective problems or challenging them right now But what they can do as a collective as a community to advance the more global needs of Scholarship and and preservation of culture and the kinds of things are important for human society My hopes for the outcomes of this process in so far as higher education are concerned. They're fairly modest And probably primary amongst them is that the voice of the research library in the discussion About the future of higher education will be taken more seriously


All right, what's up everyone so time for battle station part two a couple months ago I was recording right before I left my old apartment just showing you my setup So here's another battle station slash behind the scenes episode of my youtube channel So just to give you a feel for what's going on. So if you saw the last one this part It's not gonna be new. I have this huge wooden desk. This is where I do all the action I actually have less stuff on this nowadays But you know same I still got this is the x2 20 I think I said in my last video I'm using it once again because my x200 it just had a little problem I'll fix it, but I'm just it's down there somewhere. I'll fix it later But yeah, I got the x2 20 got some got some cord management with twist ties stuff like that But I usually keep the desk pretty clean I just happen to have a couple a little junk in here, but my my actual room I feel like I need decoration look at all this blank wall I need to do something about that, but you know, whatever give me your ideas or or send me You know some of the yeah, what is that wall hangers or whatever whatever those things are called So anyway, this pretty much hasn't changed. I got this same chair still get the same desk This is where I do most of my youtuber cornings and you know pretty much all my work that I do at home I do have internet at this house unlike the other one. So that's different However, I don't have Wi-Fi. So I have to be plugged up to the ethernet all at all times Sometimes I'll take this and you know take it to my bed or whatever But I don't like using the internet in my bed even though, you know, I end up doing it It's probably a bad habit But anyway, let's let's talk about lifestyle first off It's getting to November. So if I don't know if you've ever lived in Arizona But like in Arizona if I went out right now, what is it? About 2 o'clock. It's still it's pretty hot in November still in Arizona. I mean at least it's probably in the 80s or something I don't know So like what I actually like to do during the night is I just open up my windows and let it get as cold as it Possibly can which you know can be in the 40s, which isn't that cold all things considered And I just sleep in my sleeping bag And that's because I'm one of those people who just likes the feeling of coldness and being like I don't know just being in utero and something I guess I you know I don't know what it is you can psychoanalyze but yeah So I like sleeping my sleeping bag and then I have fur covers on top of that actually it's fake fur But you know, whatever I actually always sleep with the fake fur just because This stuff is relatively cheap You can get it like Walmart or a big box store for like 20 bucks these little ones and then this one this Clean size one might be like 40 bucks, but they're so good. They keep you so warm If you just have them so I sleep between them with my sleeping bag So that's a really weird thing. I can't believe I just told you that but whatever. I think it works perfect It feels great.  It's short season all year round basically So when I get out of bed, of course, I sleep naked All I got to do is just go over just the shorts grab them put on the shoes Put on a shirt. It's always sandals season in Arizona too, but after that after those three things I got everything I need for you know, don't have to do anything fancy to get ready. I don't even put on socks Honestly, if you wear socks with sandals, what's wrong with you but I just hated getting over here, you know Moving the chair and getting to you know, whatever stuff I had in there So I just keep the shorts out here much easier So anyway, one thing the classic leather bag So one thing that my last place had that this place doesn't is dedicated bookshelves But now I pretty much just put books like in random places in a couple places. This is one of the segments In our house where I keep books. They're just supposed to be normal shelves Probably for like towels or something because it's right next to the bathroom But yeah, just keep most of probably a third of my books around here And I used to be autistic and keep them in like my topics, but I actually found it's much better It's much funner if you just put them in a random order So I pretty much just put them, you know, whatever order I picked them out of my boxes when I was moving And put them up here and you know people who come always, you know, we'll peruse the books here and in different places So painting I don't have enough hanging materials, but you know, I'll do it later Anyway, here's Ryan's room not gonna show you that just a bunch of anime posters and stuff, but you know, whatever You got the kitchen nothing really worth noting in here Do finally I had a kitchen at my last place, of course, but I didn't have a kitchen table So I savor this thing I try to use it as much as possible But we just don't have that much room on the other side It sort of annoys me, but I do move this thing out every once in a while got some plantains, which I need a They're about to go bad. I need to cook something with them, but that one's hung up That one's hung up, but anyway, this is basically the main room slash media center slash recording studio slash whatever else We got two couches. This is my official couch. This is Ryan's official couch That is the guest chair, which I actually found out by a dumpster Just sanitized it and brought it in here. It has some upholstery damage, but it's in good shape I got a futon. That's Ryan's No one really uses it. So anyway, so anyway in my media center, don't have TV. Don't have cable. Don't have any of that stuff This is just an Arch Linux desktop Using i3 or whatever pretty much my default setup and this is where I have all my movies and Videos television shows music all the different kind of stuff Memes even and me and Ryan will just sit here. Sometimes when we're bored, you know watch memes You know peruse through memes watch TV something like that or like usually turn on the movie But just like forward through it or something like that something weird Got some other books in here two more shelves of them Again, I liked it. They're sort of scattered in this door disorganized I'll look at that. I finally went to the bookstore and got Lovecraft I was trying so hard like there's this huge bookstore in Arizona that I always go to But they never seem to have it, but I got a motherload not just this but like Vigil and other ones of course. I've already read all the Lovecraft stuff. I just wanted to have it, but whatever Coffee table got some stuff that I'm actively reading. I don't know why Yeah, so here's my other mic if we're recording something out here It's actually on two person mode so it records that way in this way So me and Ryan could record something something like that. That's where we recorded the podcast or whatever And we might be recording more podcasts. I'll tell you more about that later, but that's not super important now Let's see what else so here's where I keep the library books I just keep them out here just because sometimes I'll actually be out here doing work if I want to I don't know Be mobile. I'll usually keep a think-pad charger here But yeah, I got some Sanskrit from Arians and medieval rhetoric I've been reading that because I've been looking into more historical linguistics or like not historical Linguistics as in well, you know, I mean whatever So radio Romance got some Chris Hutton got some Christopher Hutton's good a worth read the worthwhile read Let's see what else just random stuff got some Thomas Carlisle. I don't know whatever Just different stuff. I've checked out this semester. I'm a grad student so I can check things out for like years and years And last but not least. This is the laundry the laundry nook, I guess Like when I'm cleaning the place, but here's where I have this is actually the entryway But here is where I have the last of the books a lot of the languagey ones Some of these are actually Ryan's I'd probably say in the whole house. Maybe a dozen or so books or Ryan's But yeah, the rest of them Yeah, are mine. So yes, it's pretty nice. I can fit pretty much all the books I didn't have to I was worried I'd have to buy a shelf or something, but I actually didn't but oh, yeah That's for another video. I'll tell you about that later But anyway, so that's pretty much it. I'm gonna turn off the lights electric bill is always a little too high I just needed the good lighting for the video. So anyway, that's basically it again We got the media center and this is where you know, some of the public fun had we've had parties here It actually works. I can actually have parties at my house now And but most of the work gets done in my own place This is where I am responding to all your emails and comments and stuff like this usually I spend less and less time on the university just because They're really only two days. I need to go to class in next semester probably even less, but Anyway, so that's about it.  But yeah, so that's my battle station update You have now seen my behind the scenes. So see you. See you next time