there. So by all means, if you have any questions as we go through or any issues, raise those in the chat. I'm Sarah Jones from the Digital Curation Centre and the other person you can see here is Ellen from Dance. I don't know if you want to introduce yourself, Ellen? Yeah, I'm from Dance as you say and I work on open air, mainly on the RDM training work package and also involved in other projects. This is Eudat, Eelsknau and, well, we've worked together, Dance, we've worked together with Mayan Grotsweld and Eliana Grankhauser who are not present here and also Emily Herrmann from Udent who is now also moderator. So just to mention. Excellent. Okay, so what we're going to do, we're going to speak for probably around 40 minutes. I'll give you an introduction to the survey and some of the highlight findings and then Ellen will dig into more detail on what we found and then what we'll do, we'll come to the recommendations and kind of next steps from this. So to give you a bit of background to the survey, this was conducted by Open Air which is a project that both Ellen and myself are involved in and also the third data expert group and I'm here kind of representing the two of those and we ran the survey over last summer, so between May and July last year and it was really intended to help the EC improve and iterate its guidance and approach to DMPs. We've had some questions raised on Open Air webinars about how people could give feedback to the EC and one of the tasks of the Fair Data Expert group is to collate and to help evaluate the DMP template and to help them develop discipline-specific guidelines. So what we did in the survey, we asked about general attitudes towards data management plans and a number of specific questions around the Horizon 2020 template and the support that people felt was needed and we had a lot of help to circulate that survey, lots of e-infrastructure projects like UDAT and Foster and others helped us distribute it and also groups like Libre and the Research Data Alliance and partway through the survey we realised that we were getting more research support responses rather than researchers so we also worked with the European Commission's project officers to specifically target researchers with active projects and to work through year and EuroDoc which are early career researcher networks and that was to help people to help get more responses. Overall we received 289 responses and around half of those were from researchers and 60% of people identified themselves with research support so they could select the two categories if desired. All of the results as well as this infographic are available already on Zenodo and I just wanted to flag this as a kind of quick overview of the findings. What I'll do is give you a couple of highlights from this and then Ellen will talk through more detailed results. So overall there was a positive response to the data management plans. 60% of people thought that it was a positive experience even if they had had some reservations so you can see in this first quote that people had felt it looked like an administrative exercise but actually when they went through that process of creating the plan they found that it made them reflect on the best format for the data or how to make them available and they found value in that process. There were nonetheless some people who felt it was a negative experience overall that was just 16% and 24% of respondents here had chosen not applicable and it's not 100% clear what they mean there but I am taking it as they're kind of sitting on the fence so there are some positive aspects but also some negative ones and you can see we had a number of responses like this quote at the bottom here where there were some things they thought were helpful like it making them reflect on potential issues but they also had some frustrations so sometimes our comments like the template was too long and cumbersome or some of the questions were too specific or too vague. Overall there was a good understanding of fair. We asked participants to respond to a series of statements and this statement that I don't understand what fair means was the one that provoked the kind of strongest reaction. People really disagreed with that so I think the basic principle of fair is really well understood and is something that people appreciate but some of the terminology poses difficulties and I think things like terms like interoperability in particular when people are thinking about how to implement that they get more confused. So what we found was that the language at the moment is providing a little bit of a barrier and there were 40 terms overall that respondents mentioned were unclear to them and you can see that interoperability is the kind of primary term there that came out as an issue. The other terms that posed problems in particular were things like metadata and ontologies and controlled vocabularies and in this quote you can see people are saying it's more of the ICT type of jargon that people are having issues with. So I think it's really important that there's support on the ground to help people understand the requirements and how to implement them and in this second quote you can see that one of the participants mentioned that they've got help from the Swedish National Data Service and without that they wouldn't have really been able to finish the DMP because they just wouldn't have understood or been able to clarify what the questions meant. So I think there's a key role for both the ECs funded projects but also for data centers and for the kind of institutional support provision. The template structure was also found to be problematic and this came out across a number of questions. People found that there was quite a lot of overlap between you know the different elements of fare, the findability, accessibility, interoperability and reuse and this meant that certain questions were repeated or very similar questions so things like metadata came up in all of the different sections and it also meant that the ordering wasn't always that logical with the questions. So people were being asked to explain how they were going to make their data findable before they were talking about the repositories that they were going to use so potentially things could you know already be answered in one question and then they'd find another question asking the same kind of thing. People also mentioned that some of the questions were a little bit precise and that they would prefer more drop-down options and examples and that's one of the themes you'll see come out as Ellen talks. We also asked the users to prioritize what kind of support they would like and we gave them 10 options on a kind of on a matrix and they listed their top five priorities and what you see here is the weighted scores and you can see the kind of top priorities are really about having more tailored guidance that's pertinent to that researcher's context so the top answer was suggesting relevant standards for their particular field and data type and you can see the fifth one down is about recommending repositories that they can use and then the other sec that came up at the top here were about having more examples or suggested answers more drop-down options and discipline specific guidance so really what the priority at the moment is for users is having kind of more tailored support. There were also some options about kind of data exchange across different systems so connecting up different research tools or maybe pulling information in so you could pre-fill aspects of the DMP or push information out to share with services either at an institutional level or with data centers. These were of a lesser concern to people at the moment although obviously some people did choose those as their priorities too. So drawing out all of the results from the survey we pulled out seven recommendations and these are what we'll return to at the end and talk you through in detail but for the moment I'll hand over to Ellen who will go into more of the specific questions and the survey results. Yes thank you so I will go through a number of other questions and answers of the survey and then we will return to the recommendation with Sarah again. So that's why I move on to the next slide. So at the top of the slide you can see that this is about question four that's why it's between brackets. Experience with the DMP template this was a question that respondents couldn't were asked to enter to what extent the statements that were that are also on this slide represent their experiences at the DMP template. Originally this was a five point scale but we summarized it in the report. Another thing that I should mention is that questions could be skipped by the respondents and this one was only answered by 60 so 173 after in total 289. But you can see in this table that the DMP template is considered by most respondents to this question as a very useful template. 105 have said they agreed it is a very useful template so it's rather positive I think. Most of the respondents to this question also agree that there is a clear structure and the questions are grouped into helpful categories there's also agreement with the level of guidance and provided contextual information. Now as mentioned before the concept of fair that is at the bottom seems clear to the majority respondents although responses to other questions such as questions five to eight may clear that these are questions about implementing the fair data principles as mentioned language seems to be a barrier. Many respondents would would like to have more drop down instead of free text answers as you can see and taking the average the number of questions seems to be perceived or right. Not the last one but the one before questions might be perceived as irrelevant but more respondents disagree on that point. Let's see the next question yeah so the question seven was about guidance and the respondents could note any guidance that is missing or could be improved but this question was answered in comments by 81 respondents that is 28 percent of all the respondents naturally only people would would like to point out missing guidance I would answer this question so the word cloud gives an expression of the answers given by the respondents to this question it is clear from the answers to this question and question six on confusing and inconsistent and redundant terminology that was also mentioned earlier in the webinar that guidance could be improved by providing more examples of DNPs repositories how to improve interoperability cost estimation and more subject specific and specialized guidelines. The guidance mentioned by some to be too complicated and technical and by others it could be made less vague and less generic people asked also to provide information on where to find more specialized guidelines not work fluently. Question eight was about coverage. The respondents could note any topics that are missing so this one is not about guidance the topics that are missing or ones that should be removed in the DNP template in this case 15 percent only 42 of the 289 respondents indicated missing topics and the topics that were mentioned are listed here where listed as missing topics but these aren't currently completely missing in the template except for software so what was meant was what is a good repository for software what are the possibilities for long-term software storage in terms of metadata and licensing well as most topics are not up to some extent already in the template the comments are mostly about the level of detail people expected per area as can also be seen in the in the comment it also depends on the project that you are working on so there's a quote here on the slide I think this would probably vary according to individual projects it's possible that a one-size-fits-all approach is not practical. Yeah question nine was about the process so the participants could note any issues they encountered following the EC guidelines for example with knowing when a DNP is due how it will be reviewed how to include costs and so on now first of all again as you can see the respondents ended only 63 issues in total and 19 respondents took the opportunity to say they encountered no issues but of the 289 respondents 75 percent skipped the question skipped this question and did not enter any issues so a minority entered issues and the issues that are mentioned here in the table it's about cost clear guidance and clear requirements the issues that stand out here we think are about the process of updating a DNP doing a project what should be provided when and how do you do this technically understanding how these are reviewed by what standards and by home and if the DNPs would be monitored later on also mentioned is the issue of estimating and including associated costs what costs are eligible now about reviewing there's a quote there says processes around the assessment of the content are unclear to me and the other quote stated before clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding research management is urgently needed for researchers and also for RDN support teams at universities sorry now the next question respondents could could give other issues or provide other suggestions and here around 85 percent of the respondents skipped this question so there's still 48 people left who entered issues that are shown here and again some of those said they had no issues or suggestions and the two topics that stand out from the one who gave suggestions are the need for more guidance and a clearer structure of the template and guidance is seen as can be provided by sharing examples of good DNPs or provide discipline specific guidance these are all results that come out of comments that people gave and with regard to improving the structure of the template it was suggested to create a shorter template or provide checkboxes to tick and also can be seen by the quote here is which part should be set up already in the beginning but can be added later it would be helpful to indicate needed and nice to have for the starting point or for different stages now the next one is not about question 11 but about question 12 because 11 is already mentioned early in the webinar and 12 is about DNP publishing lots of people have answered this question although not all but 134 and almost half of the total number of the respondents provided an answer to the question would you openly publish your DNP and the outcome of this question shows a clear willingness to share DNPs that could be example DNPs for others we think so 48 percent of the answers were yes without any comment and around 20 people said yes but only if these of their requirements met such as confidentiality or only after a project finished confidentiality was also showstopper for some open DNPs probably projects where not too much of the nature of the data should be refilled or brings farmers into in danger as mentioned here now yeah we have one more about suggestions now what are the main suggestions you would give to the european commission about its approach to DNPs in the open data pilot that was question 14 it was answered by a quarter of the respondents and the word cloud of the responses as shown here we can recognize many of the topics that are mentioned before such as the need for example DNPs but a new one here is to involve researchers and institutions and that's also mentioned in some of the comments and shown here talk to researchers and ask them whether the DNP requirements are realistic involve researchers when developing disciplinary guidance and another one is focus on technical exchange format for these plans so they can be shared between tools that is make the plans themselves fair I think that's a fair point as well now the last part of last questions are about providing feedback and reviewing DNPs the question 15 was have you given feedback to other DNP writers on the above DNP now half of the respondents have answered this question and of these most said no I'm 50 respondents and just and followed up with answering the next question which was question question 16 on the kind of feedback and as you can see most of these responses were spread out until over these multiple choice options that we gave and not much other and that's a recovered most there then in question 18 the next slide it's about reviewing there was also a question 17 which is not shown here and it was asked how supporting researchers given a horizon 2020 DNP deferred from assisting on DNPs for other funders now to that question 45 people responded that they felt the horizon 2020 template took longer than other templates now on this slide you can see on the right hand side the result from our survey on the horizon 2020 template and on the left side you can see the results from local research in the Netherlands by LCRDM and the same question was asked there and as you can see it might be that the V-view process to have taken less time for other DNPs than the horizon 2020 DNPs or we cannot say a lot about it of course because only a few people have answered this question in both cases so I can hand over now to Sarah again or to spend a little bit more attention to the recommendations okay that's great thank you very much Ellen so so what we wanted to do to close is to work through the recommendations that we we listed those seven and I'll talk through the specifics that we've kind of suggested in the report under each of those really to think about what hopefully the EC or others can aspire to so the the first recommendation was about clarifying the EC's requirements for data management plans there were quite a lot of comments that came out throughout the report where people had you know either had misconceptions or had been misadvised or had some confusion over exactly what was required so we recommended that the EC collates all their data related and DMP guidelines into a single document they have one main document the one that's linked at the bottom here which is the Fair Data Management Guidelines but there's also guidance in other documents like the general open access guidelines that's not within there so at the moment there's quite a few places for researchers to look so we suggested bringing that together and also making announcements as these guidelines change because people aren't always aware that it's been updated and that there might be new things to adhere to we also suggested being more explicit about when a DMP is and isn't required I mentioned right at the outset that 16 percent of respondents had said you know they didn't see the coin in the DMP process and some of the comments related to those kind of no answer the negative answers were flagging things that were actually genuine concerns they were saying that they didn't have any data that they didn't see why they had to create a DMP and in those circumstances they wouldn't need to so I think actually some of those issues that are encountered could actually be be fixed by just some more guidelines and being a bit more explicit about when people don't need to create a DMP and there are also some questions about exactly what set of questions should be answered so within the guidelines we've linked to here there's a big set of questions and then there's a table at the end with a slightly different version of those questions and people were wondering exactly which ones to respond to and they'd also asked for a DocEx version and actual template to fill in as well as supporting the online tools that are in place so this is the kind of things we've said around clarifying those requirements as I mentioned at the outset there were also some general points made about the template structure and people finding that questions were being repeated or that the ordering was a bit confusing so we've suggested regrouping the questions according to key activities so the fair concepts should definitely remain within that but we're not sure that it's the way to structure the template so potentially asking people about their data creation about concepts like metadata or their plans for sharing all together and because there are so many questions within the template I think people often feel overwhelmed at that six month point so we'd suggest kind of identifying what questions are the primary ones what what do the commission really want answered initially and what potentially are secondary questions that could be fleshed out as the project goes on or could even be skipped if they're not relevant to the project so there are some questions for example about data access committees which may be aren't relevant if the project isn't creating sensitive data so some grouping that enabled a better pathway through would be better. We'd also suggested including more yes no questions or drop-down options or having integrations between tools so you could pull in lists of repositories or or other kind of registry information so researchers can select relevant options and because the EC obviously it's evaluating DNPs and looking at the practice that's going on we suggested identifying questions that will support their evaluation and formulating those in a more structured way so they can have automated compliance checks in future. In terms of the the DMP content and terminology as I flag the language is a bit of a barrier at the moment so we've suggested simplifying the terminology where possible or where certain terms technical terms need to be used provide a glossary to assist researchers in understanding those and in particular there was a big call for example answers but I think it's really useful to provide example answers around those problematic questions so the ones around interoperability for example so it helps researchers understand the terms and see them applied in context in their research area. In terms of the DMP content we'd suggest shortening the number of questions or as we mentioned earlier having some kind of prioritization about which of the primary questions and which are more optional and so having some kind of hierarchy or routing through so it's easier for the projects to complete their DMP and for it to be that evolving document as suggested by the EC guidelines. At the moment because all the questions are presented at the outset I think a lot of projects feel that they have to answer everything and and get a little bit overwhelmed at the start because it seems too too much detail at that six-month stage. There was a big call for discipline specific guidelines so this is something that I think really should be added to to enhance the template and the guidance that's offered and people also asked for example answers and the more that those can be tailored to the specific disciplines and pick up on good practice in each domain the better and again both Ellen and I flagged the kind of request for drop-down options. Again if these can be tailored to the practice in different disciplines that that would be better and we suggest that the EC builds on existing work going on in this area we'll flag some some work or later on but there's things like the Science Europe domain protocols that could be built on and obviously they could collaborate with discipline specific data centers and and other groups like Learned Societies. There's already a lot of Horizon 2020 DMPs being published and so over half of the participants said that they'd publish their DMP and many are already available on the web and we think it's worthwhile for the EC to build on that traction to encourage projects to publish their data management plans and also to collate those together so that the most information can be used and so offering the registry service and ideally providing a library of approved examples. I know this this can be contentious sometimes but I just don't want to to say this a good DMP because I don't want it to be copied but there was quite a lot of points of confusion and people looking for good practice examples so I think it would be beneficial to offer those and again there's already work going on in this area the EC has a number of external reviewers for DMPs we've got all the infrastructure projects that they support that could help with this and Libre I saw the RDM working group has been trying to develop a registry of DMPs and through the Libre the library community to do reviews to show what is a good example. Costs came out in a number of questions as an issue so we really recommend including RDM costs in the grant applications. At the moment the timing isn't that beneficial because people are asked about their costs within the data management plan which is first developed at month six of the project and obviously by then it's too late to include additional costs in the proposal and so we suggest raising a few questions or alerts at the grant proposal stage and the respondents to the survey really wanted a lot more worked examples so they know what an eligible cost is and how that should be added into the proposal and I just put this this one quote from one of the respondents on this slide just to show the level of detail people are looking for they have quite a lot of questions about exactly what is eligible and how to cost that in and obviously it's really useful to brief reviewers on what is eligible as well and also what should be expected so if costs aren't written into a proposal that's something that's flagged as a potential issue and the final recommendation that we pulled out of the the survey was to explain more about the DMP review practices the commission has an internal assessment framework that's been developed in REIA the research executive agency and we recommend that that's endorsed and used throughout the commission and we've been doing some training courses with commission project offices through the foster plus project we recommend continuing those has been quite a demand internally for for more help on how to review DMPs and at the last at the last session we we discussed developing some guidelines on how to do reviews and an FAQ on the practical implementation of the pilot so I think those be useful things to developers internal resources but in terms of the review it's not just about what goes on within the commission it would also be useful to have a public statement on how the data management plans are being assessed and ideally release that assessment framework so people know you know what they're going to be checked against as I mentioned there are a number of activities already going on that that might help with some of these recommendations so the Science Europe group has developed domain data protocols these are essentially discipline specific guidelines or practices that could be adhered to when you're developing your DMPs there are already a number of collections of example data management plans the DCC has a list but there's also Rio Journal and Zenodo and OpenAir so there's lots of examples online that you can find in terms of the RDM costs there are already some existing guides both from a Dutch Dutch group that coordinates RDM work called LC RDM they've taken some UKDA guidelines and applied those to Horizon 2020 projects to think about actual what time and effort is needed on the various activities and how to how to cost that in and the Wellcome Trust has guidelines in their data management requirements on the kind of things that are eligible costs in terms of providing kind of drop downs and pulling different registry content into tools there's been some work we've done on DMP online integrating the metadata standards directory so researchers can find relevant metadata standards but other tools like Re3Data could be plugged in as well and there are working groups to try and develop common standards for data management plans as one that's set up recently through the RDA and I think that will be a useful group for the commission and others to engage with and obviously they'll be ongoing support from the Fairday Trexpert group and OpenAir and others that can help the commission as they continue to develop their guidelines but this webinar is not just about the commission and what they do and there are obviously actions that all of us can take as a community and we would encourage you to to share your DMPs through whatever means you can publish in journals like Rio or deposit in repositories like Zenodo or add them to the DCC list and I think the really critical thing for for all of us to do as a community is to continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you or particularly what doesn't work the commission really wants that feedback so that they can improve these guidelines and and feed that into future developments and whether you're coming from the kind of research community or the support side I think it's really good to collaborate as you're developing your approach to DMPs and also feed your work into wider initiatives so there are national open access desks in every country from OpenAir and there are international groups doing work in this area like the Research Data Alliance so just a couple of concluding remarks and then we'll open up the questions and obviously there are lots of recommendations we've put forward to the EC here but I don't want that to detract from the fact that the feedback overall in the survey was very positive I think the community really likes the fact that there is this open data pilot and the the fair data management plans and for many you know they'd found the process of developing the DMP very positive and over half had found that the template was very useful too and around a quarter of the ones who answered the question about improvements had said that they'd had no issues following the EC guidelines so clearly a lot of what's there already is working but as with anything there's always room for improvement and there were various suggestions made about how we could maybe iterate those guidelines and provide more support as I mentioned the EC has been asking for feedback and they've already iterated their guidelines so they started with you know the open data pilot they expanded that to more areas and I think the move to now introduce you know fair data management is to try and respond to some of the concerns researchers had at the outset about not being able to open their data so obviously they want the data to be as open as possible as closed as necessary but this introduction of fair is to really stress the the benefits of managing data and and sharing it in a way that makes it reusable to others I think further updates are likely so the fair data expert group has been asked to advise on revisions to the template and also to to think about the development of discipline specific guidelines so I think these are things that are likely to happen but I'm sure the EC will reflect on the the other kind of outcomes and suggestions from the survey so just to to leave you on this slide where you can find out more as I mentioned at the start all of the materials on Zanodo so we've got the full survey report as well as the raw data and the analysis we did and our infographic and Ellen and I are here presenting today but there were five co-authors so just to acknowledge our other co-authors Marianne Kvartveld from Dan's Emily Herman's who's also here and can answer questions with us and Eliana van Kauser so thank you very much for listening and I know various questions have come in in the chat box so I think what we'll do now is is just kind of open the floor to those questions so Gwen do you want to give us a more shall I just look from the google doc so there was one preliminary question just asking if the presentation will be made available and and it will um that will be available with the webinar recording at the end we'll circulate that to all the participants and post it online okay I can see this these have been put up now I jumped to the google doc so the the second question hopefully the participants can see this document as well isn't the 74% disagree school on I don't understand fair contradictory to the observation I made at the start that terms are unclear and it is and this is one of the things we found within the survey I think at a high level people do understand fair but there's different conceptions about what fair means and I think when it comes to putting that into practice and talking about how you'll make your data accessible intruproable reusable people sometimes struggle about about how they're going to do that and they had some issues with some of the terminology and there were I noticed at the start when when Ellen was speaking there were a number of links shared in the chat about some fair metrics work and about new papers that are coming out from the group who originally conceived this idea of fair so the the fair data and fair metrics question I think was answered in the chat and so the their metrics are really just a way to assess how fair data are and that's a new paper that's coming out and then the next question I'm going to hand this over to Ellen is there any breakdown about willingness to publish a dnp along the lines of support and researchers I don't know whether we're able to differentiate those from the results yeah I I think we did but there was not a real difference between them but I'm I'm not sure I don't have it now at we we try to do that in several other locations and then when there was a difference clear difference between the two then we mentioned it in a report but I don't know if we okay so this question okay so we should be able to track the results to identify who which you know how many had come from researchers or from support staff and as as we mentioned all the data is on Zanodo so by all means download the data set and you'll hopefully be able to identify that but I assume there wasn't that much of a difference because it's not something we flagged specifically and then the next question I guess is for me are there any plans on making the dnp online template more interoperable to allow smooth integration of info from local systems or vice versa yes definitely this is something that's one of the key priorities for us we want to enable data exchange across systems and allow people to to push information in from local research systems the common standards group that's that's running through rda will adopt whatever they develop so that will also help with interoperability in future too the question about good examples for dnps um I think was was answered in the chat um there is a list on the dcc website which is linked to there but there are others as well so and the rio um rio journal um the links there are a few hyperlinks in the slides that you can follow um so I think there's probably about 15 dnps that have been published in rio and there are lists from other groups as well the guidelines state that the horizon 2020 template is not mandatory and that other templates can be used instead if all the main topics are covered does anyone have experience with that um so we've had one answer in the chat already falco um no sorry that was falco who asked it I think um somebody said that while they're in brussels they were told the horizon 2020 template is not mandatory um but the agencies actually examine the incoming dnps using the horizon 2020 template um so my understanding here the the template isn't mandatory um but I think it's advisable to use it or at minimum to make sure that you cover all of the same elements because the assessment framework um although that's at the moment it's been developed by rio it's just being used internally in rio um it potentially will be used more broadly across the commission um and I think since that's the way they're assessing them it's sensible to try and follow that same structure just so that it's easier for people to evaluate your plans but the template itself isn't mandatory you can use other templates um the experience with that we have actually had a help desk inquiry through dcc where somebody had to use another template and they'd been told by their project officer they were using the wrong one so I think the response you know can be variable it's not officially um mandatory to use it but sometimes people get different advice on that so it's probably safest to go with it unless you've got a strong opinion another way um and then the question about the six month stage here I'm guessing that was related to to comments I made as I was talking um at the moment with the easy approach to dmp's they're required at month six and then are updated as as necessary throughout the the course of the project so this is why I mentioned six month stage because the dmp isn't needed at the grant application stage like with other funders um was there a question about asking if filling in a dmp would change the behavior of researchers um I don't think we did ask a question like that no Helen shaking her head we asked them about their attitude to responding to horizon 2020 trying to remain on that Ellen sorry I thought you're going to say something no I the only thing I would like to mention is that there are so many comments on uh on many questions and they were also in the line of this um um of this question so if we didn't directly ask it but there were a lot of responses in the comments that uh about this yeah I was actually surprised in that first question about whether people find it a positive or negative experience I was surprised how many of the comments in that talked about having approached it with a negative mindset you know thinking it was just going to be administrative and lots of people had said about actually how it made the project reflect and they found benefit that they weren't really anticipating so whether it changes their practice is another step further but um I think the process themselves they'd found useful so far um how do we provide feedback to the EC I mean there isn't really aside from having run this survey there isn't really a formal mechanism but what I would recommend is is talking to your project officer so you know when you're part of the pilot sharing your experiences so that they know what's working or what's not obviously you can um share information through open air through your no ads or also to the fair data expert group and we can try and feed it back through those mechanisms as well but part of the reason why we ran this survey was specifically because the community had asked how they could feedback so this was one mechanism for doing that and the discipline that researchers were from I don't think we asked that no no it was it was in the responses right um but we couldn't link this to the answers so it was not a set up properly I think in the survey to make sure that we could split it per discipline yeah um yeah so question two you'll see if you look at the survey report has been removed because that was where people identified who they were and the organization they were from so sometimes people have flagged their discipline but we'd agree to anonymize the results and as anyone got experience with discipline specific templates um with guidance so there is some being developed as I mentioned the domain protocols by Science Europe and I know some universities within the UK have discipline specific guidance that they've developed um you know within certain schools where they've got local support staff um but I think that there isn't enough of that often funders have one template um and they have a set of guidelines that go with it and for funders like the EC that cover a broad range of disciplines you know it's fairly generic and I think this is why sometimes people want something that's much more specific to their research area but if you look at some of the funders like Wellcome or other health funders obviously the guidance there is more tailored to to that subject area we did try to and then from Marta oh I think there's a delay there yeah uh no it's a CESTA project um last year where we developed a guide uh I left the the link in the chat box but it's specific for the social sciences just as an example yeah yeah I think if you if you look at some of the um kind of community infrastructures the the ERIX like CESTA you'll find there are more kind of subject specific resources um and then Marta has a question um if a DMP is only completed at month six in the project isn't it an issue for costing it absolutely is um they can't ask for more costs within the DMP um which is why we're recommending that some questions are included in the application stage around costs um so at the moment I mean I I guess the only fixed projects could have if they come to month six write their DMP and find that they have costs like if they're planning to deposit in a repository and there's going to be a cost levy because they have a large amount of data they would need to try and find the resources from somewhere within their project which means cutting something else or you know changing their plans somehow um so this is why we think it's it's best that that's raised at the application stage so that any costs are included then at the moment the timing really doesn't work well and in Rob Holt mentions that in RDA there's been a birds of a feather group addressing the inconsistency and non-repeatability of these kind of questionnaires and that makes results hard to use to verify the effects of policy decisions um so uh I guess it's about trying to uh synthesize things across funders I know Science Europe um they've actually got a workshop happening at the end of the month and that's about funders policies and approaches to data data management to try and get more coherence across the approaches um so that could be a useful thing to reflect on in that group um Rob if you want to say more about the group um by all means add more in the chat as well and do we know if there's a consensus on how the DMPs will be monitored in time throughout the project and whether there'll be sanctions whenever DMPs are not followed so at present the monitoring happens via the project officers because the DMP is a deliverable um so they're checked at the six month stage and then whenever there are project reviews sometimes the commission brings in external reviewers and sometimes it will be the project officer themselves so that look at the DMP um when we've run training courses in the commission you know people have asked about sanctions um I think given that this is a pilot um it's you know it's not full policy yet and things take time to bed in they're not going to be very strict on sanctions yet but it's the kind of thing that tight ends up over over time so so I think in the longer term that is more likely but I think at the moment there's there's a fair bit of of leniency and really what they're looking for is a best effort response from from projects obviously if a project says they'll deposit and then you know just refuses to do that in the end and there's not a good reason um then maybe the project officer will follow up and and potentially in future there'll be sanctions but I'd be surprised if there's any like quite yet um I'm just gonna scroll down again the questions have jumped um and Sophie who asks um that she's wondering if researchers have given feedback regarding creating the DMP at the beginning of the proposal instead of the six month point um there were definitely some comments about the timing of the DMP and overall I mean there were different views throughout the survey um overall people liked the fact that it was within the project rather than at the application stage um some had thought the six month point was too early for certain aspects but overall it was generally felt to be okay um I think within uh Horizon 2020 some people do provide some information at the proposal as well there is an optional data management section that can be completed which is similar to a DMP so sometimes people fill it in there um but I'm trying to think about other comments that came out of the survey. Does any of you remember or want to reflect on Ellen? I think it's mainly uh what I would share is what you mentioned also already before that the costing aspect that it would be um good if people would have more ideas about how how much people how much things would cost as a um stage when they applied for a project instead of when the project starts because they could still ask for funds. Yeah that's not about creating a DMP but it's DMP related in fact. Yeah I think it's definitely useful to to flag some things at the proposal stage and it helps projects you know to think early on and when we've been asked by certain projects about whether they should fill in that optional form we've always recommended it if the you know if data is a component of their project it's helpful to consider the things early and then that also gives you essentially a preliminary draft of your DMP for month six something that you can then flush out a bit further once you get to that deliverable. I just noticed that Anders has put in the chat that he's heard of one of the projects where payments were held back because of a missing DMP um so I think you know because these are deliverables that there can be sanctions um so it's definitely be worth complying and filling them in and in terms of the metadata or metadata standards compulsory I find this very complex to provide and Maria's mentioning and so the standards are recommended but the commission acknowledges that there aren't standards in every field so I think from recollection the question says something like if there aren't metadata standards please describe what you'll capture so they're looking for an explanation of of the information that will be collected instead. Just trying to scan through if there are other questions but the the time frame for updates um the guidelines suggest that the DMP should be updated um as applicable to the project so um when things change with the data so there might be a change in terms of which data should be shared or whether they're able to share data or they might change plans on what data will be created or how so the DMP should be updated then um but it says kind of at minimum at the review time so so when people are um sorry I see Paula means the update of the DMP template rather than the update the DMP itself I don't know that there are time frames from that we've only just delivered this report to the EC so I think they need a bit of time to to look and reflect um but um yeah probably I guess sometimes summer or maybe later this year and there might be updates to the template but that's something we'll we'll definitely let you know what we hear back on so I just noticed the time as well with two minutes to two um so we've we've filled up the rest of the webinar with questions um it is any that we've missed by all means uh we paste it in the chat if you want a quick answer scrolling through it looks like we've we've captured most of them so so hopefully you've you've heard back okay yeah I think so too now please have a look forward yeah yeah it looks like it people are saying yeah and people are saying thank you as well so hopefully we've covered everything you were looking for um by all means take a look at the report and and share information back um and thank you all for attending goodbye goodbye


Hey everybody it's Brian and welcome to the 56th Qt tutorial with C++ and GUI programming. Today we're going to be covering the Qsql table model and I've already got some code written because I didn't want to waste your valuable time. In our project we just have a reference to SQL and in our main window .h we are using a main window instead of a dialogue. We have some includes. We've got Qt debug, Qt GUI, Qt core and Qt SQL. In our private section we've got Qsql database named it DB and Qsql table model and it's just a pointer to model and in our implementation very simply we're just setting the central widget to the table and opening the database connection here. Haven't done any real error handling just for the sake of simplicity. Let's just save and run, build this thing, make sure there's no major problems going on here. If you've been following along with these tutorials you already have a DSN set up called MyDSN32. Just going to show you the structure of my database real quick. We have one table called test, I'm sorry one database called test with a table called people with three columns ID first name last name and we have Bob Hope, Will Smith and my daughter Heather Cairns in there. Alright now let's get to the heart of this tutorial real quick here. What we want to do is we want to populate our model and then display it. So we need to say model equal new Qsql table model and now we want to say model dot set table and we want to give it our table name and then we want to say model select and that selects the data and puts it into the model and now we want to display the model so we'll say UI, table view, set model, alright save and run. Now if you build this and everything goes as planned you'll have data but if you've been following along religiously with my tutorials you probably came up with something that had no data in it. Let me demonstrate that. Here's our DSN, configure, next, next, notice how I have this change default database too and I have the actual database name selected. If you didn't do that because I haven't told you to do that then you end up with just a blank window like this with no data in it. So if you get that and you're struggling and trying to figure out what in the world is going on here, there's a little trick I'm going to show you here. You can say queue debug, model, last error, text and when you save and run this it says unable to find table people right down here. The reason why I can't find the table is you haven't told it where it is so you go back into your DSN, just go configure, next, next, change the database to and then give it the database you want to work with. Very simple. That's how you solve that problem and voila, there's our data again. Now one thing you should note is that this is editable. You can go in here and say willsmith, baby, hit enter and when you go into the underlying database you see there's willsmith and we'll just refresh that and it's changed.  You can see the data change back. Very simple, very powerful control, lets you very easily allow the user to modify information. This is Brian. Thank you for watching. I hope you found this video educational and entertaining.


The Community College of the Air Force is where dreams happen. Established in 1972, it is the world's largest community college. Our college awards job-related Associate in Applied Science degrees and other academic credentials. Every airman that completes basic training is automatically enrolled into the Community College of the Air Force. CCAF is a regionally accredited school. So the CCAF degree holds the same standards as major state universities do. The degree program managers, such as myself, we evaluate all the credits that come in from tech school, coming from PME, basic training. We evaluate that for each student individually and make sure that they have what they need for graduation. So your college credits come from some of our 112 affiliated schools which are located worldwide. Our schools have more than 6,000 faculty which provide training to Air Force members and that results in college credit being earned for most of the training that you accomplish throughout your Air Force career. GEM is General Education Mobile because Community College of the Air Force does not teach. The General Education, we partnered with 115-plus schools to teach those courses. After completing the Associate's Degree, students have an opportunity to obtain their Bachelor's Degree through our Air University to Associate's Baccalaureate Cooperative Program which is where Community College of the Air Force has partnered with 75-plus schools to allow, if not all, most of your Community College of the Air Force Associate's Degree credits to be applied towards a Bachelor's Degree in that specific program. We have to get the transcripts in like any other institution or a regionally accredited just like everybody else. We get about 100,000 in a year and we send out about 100,000 transcripts a year. The School provides you with a $4,500 lifetime cap to pay for books, exam fees and any other material leading to the credential of your choosing. If you get a certification, we can give you college credit for some of the certain ones. If you think it should be awarded and you see other colleges awarding it, let us know because we can look at it and figure it out. The Community College of the Air Force offers everything from the Associate Applied Science Degree to also stackable credentials and certificate programs and really helps be a springboard program for the Airmen's Learning Continuum.


Mark Curtis, Vanessa Ruiz, you're watching 12 news at 10 President Barack Obama granting commutation to 58 prisoners today including one Phoenix man The 55 year old was serving a 20-year sentence for drug related convictions, but he'll now be released in May 2018 Kevin Kennedy is live in the newsroom with more on the effort to ease punishments for nonviolent offenders Kevin Yeah, it's all part of a big push to reduce the number of nonviolent criminals in our federal prison system now some inmates We're actually looking at 20 to 30 years compared to some violent criminals who actually got less than 10 Stephen Martin kills a woman and gets 12 years Simon Martinez shoots and kills his dad and gets just shy of eight Taylor Baccio bashes his kid's skull and gets seven years every crime violent or deadly and yet Shannon Blake got 20 years for dealing drugs people will look at that from the outside and say how is it possible? The short answer is our justice system for whatever reason drug crimes often end up with harsher penalties than violent offenses Blake was convicted of a federal crime and there are mandatory penalties a judge must follow Then a judge is handcuffed and cannot give that defendant or that person less than 10 years of prison President Obama now reducing Blake's sentence and 57 others today Is is one small step along the road prisoners must petition so far the president commuting? 306 sentences since he took office sensible sentencing reform started back in 2014 But black and hand be both agree real changes could take years Ignoring nonviolent criminals behind bars a Lot longer than people who've killed Shannon Blake had his sentence reduced by about six years today's commutation follows a bigger one earlier this year When 61 people had their sentence reduced Kevin Kennedy 12 news at 10


Hello, Earth citizens. In this video, I will show you a 10 minute routine to do for a chakra vibration. If you're not already familiar with the chakra system and the body, they are seven energy centers that go from the base of your tailbone all the way up to the top of your head. There are seven of these energy centers, and we call them chakras. So through these chakras, you can receive energy and you can give energy outside. Today, we will experience receiving energy into our chakras by creating vibrations in our body to open up blockages, open up anything that's stagnant along your chakra line. Now, first, I will briefly go over where each of your chakras are. The first chakra is at the base of your tailbone.  So right here, it's called the perineum.  That is your first chakra. Your second chakra is two inches below your navel. So this is my belly button, two inches below, and then imagine two inches inside. That's your second chakra. Your third chakra is your solar plexus kind of underneath your diaphragm in between your stomach on your left side, liver on your right side. So it's right here. This is your third chakra. Fourth chakra is your heart at the center of your chest. The exact location is at the center of your nipples. So if you have your nipples here and then right at the center here is your fourth chakra. Your fifth chakra right here at the dip of your clavicle, your collarbone right here. Fifth chakra, sixth chakra in between your eyebrows, your third eye. Seventh chakra, the highest point at the top of your head where babies have their soft spot right here. That's your seventh chakra. So we're going to do vibrations. I'll show you how to do vibrations from your first all the way up to your seventh so you can clear that energy channel of your chakras. Are you ready? First sit in half lotus posture like me.  Sit there and then have your hands on your knees. And then lift your tailbone and drop. Lift, drop like this, lift, drop. Now when you drop, you should feel some vibration at the base of your pelvic floor that perineum right there. Lift and drop. So when you drop, you really need to drop.  You won't feel the vibration. So lift, drop, lift, drop, lift, drop. Let's do 10 times. One, two, three, four. You can close your eyes too. Once you get the hang of it, you can close your eyes so you can feel the vibrations more. Five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10. Great job. Stop. Now close your eyes and feel the perineum. You can feel, if you're sensitive to energy, you can feel a subtle tingling sensation underneath. Can you feel that? That's vibration in your chakra. So if you want to do more of that, you can, but I'm going to move up to the second chakra. Now close your eyes and feel your second chakra. Place your mind two inches below your navel and two inches inside. As we open up each of the chakras, the first step is to bring your mind to that point. So now focus your mind on your second chakra. And then when I count to three, imagine a huge burst of energy going into your second chakra. And as you receive that burst of energy, move. Move your second chakra like you're causing a stirring of energy in there. At first, you'll have to do it on your own. But then after a certain point, the energy will take over and you will move your body naturally.  One, two, three, move. Move your second chakra like you're causing a vibration in there. There's no right or wrong answer. Just feel. Just feel. Breathe naturally. Move your second chakra. As you move your second chakra, you might feel some blockages you have around there. So lower back sacrum. A lot of people have lower back sacrum blockage because of sitting down for too long. Just move. You don't have to move that much. Just move a little bit to cause a stirring, shaking in your second chakra. Let's go for 10 more seconds. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10. Stop. Now feel your body. Can you feel that tingling, subtle sensation, that kind of electric sensation has now expanded from the bottom up. Now you kind of feel it in a bigger area of your first and second chakra. Can you feel that? All right. Now focus your mind on your third chakra right in between your stomach and liver underneath your diaphragm right here. If you need reference, open your eyes a little bit and see where I'm pointing to on my body right here. So now focus your mind on your third chakra. I will do the same thing. I will count one, two, three. Imagine a huge burst of energy going into your third chakra and move your third chakra this time. Focus on moving just this area. All right, place your mind there.  One, two, three. Move your third chakra. You can move in a circle. You can move up and down. You can move any way you'd like. Just keep the intention of circulating stagnant energy, moving energy from your third chakra. Breathe naturally.  Pain means I'm holding blockage there. Keep breathing. Move. 10 more seconds. 10, 9, 8, 7, 6. Focus on your third chakra.  Feel your body. You can feel that tingling sensation has expanded more. Maybe you feel it in your hands. Maybe you feel it in your whole abdomen now. Feel how that tingling electric sensation is getting bigger and bigger inside. If you can feel that, you're doing great.  This is where your heart chakra is. Bring your mind here. I will count to three. Imagine a huge burst of energy going into your heart. One, two, three. Move your chest. Create vibration in your chest.  Exhale through your mouth. If you carry a lot of stress moving around like this, you'll feel you can't breathe very well.  Exhale through your mouth. You can move in a circle. You can move up and down. Anything is okay. Cause shaking in your body to release blockage in your chest. 10 more seconds. 10, nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, two, one. Stop. Keep your eyes closed. Feel your body. Can you feel that electric tingling sensation has expanded even more? You feel it even wider throughout your whole body. If you can, you're doing great. Keep closing your eyes. Focus on your body now. Bring your mind to your third eye, sixth chakra. Focus around the energy of your sixth chakra. I will count to three. When I do, please shake your head side to side, up and down in a circle. Anything you'd like to open up blockages from your third eye. Are you ready? One, two, three. Shake your sixth chakra. You don't have to shake too much. Just cause gentle vibrations in that chakra to open up blockages, let energy flow once again. Breathe. Keep breathing. All the blockages in your brain. Third eye are releasing through your vibration shaking. Let's do 10 more seconds. 10, nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, two, one. Stop. Feel your body. Now you will feel a lot of tingling inside.  If you can feel that, gently nod your head. You're doing great. Energy is expanding more and more. Your chakras are activating more and more. If you can feel that tingling, your chakras are activating more and more. Now focus your attention on the top of your head, seventh chakra. The highest point in your head, this is the last chakra we will vibrate. Same thing, bring your mind here. I will count to three. A huge burst of energy will go into your seventh chakra. One, two, three. Shake, shake your seventh chakra. It still feels like you're shaking your head, but your point of focus is different from your sixth chakra.  Cause vibration on the top of your head. Exhale out, don't hold your breath. Ha, ha. You can let out a gentle sigh like I am too. It'll help you release tension from your brain. 10 more seconds. 10, nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, two, one. Stop, feel your whole body.   You may feel warmth in your hands or you may feel coldness in your body.   Congratulations. Check to see how you feel. Some people feel energy a different way, but see how do I feel different from before? And if you feel like 10 minutes wasn't enough to open all of your chakras, feel free to re-watch and re-do this exercise. Again, if you do it a second time, a third time, you will feel a lot more energy flowing throughout. And you can even do this in the morning every single day or at night every single day. The key to energy work is build and practice daily. Even if it's a small amount, consistent practice daily is what will change your energy in your body and especially in this video in your chakras. Did a great job. To experience a full one-hour brain education-based class, please visit a local body and brain yoga studio near you.


Hi everybody, Sean with jaspyscasebreaks.com and jaspys.com here doing a personal break of 2020 Bowman Baseball Hobby Personal Box for M Garza. It's available on jaspys.com for all personal breaks. He's already picked out his box. Here it is. So let's rip it open and see what we can do. Paper maker, prices of cards or for packs? Prices of cards? We don't have a way. I mean you can research it online through many different channels but if you're looking for prices of like packs and boxes from us you can go to jaspys.com and that's where you'll have all your pricing for personal breaks. Right there. Also pinned in the bottom of the chat on Instagram. Good luck Manuel. I'm going to stack them up and then we'll rip through them. Okay, he kicks boxes. So I see that you'll be second in line after this. There's one Dylan's got an order in front of you. Tomorrow release day Bowman Sterling first year back was last year so I'll show you. I mean you're looking for, you get one autograph in this box but you're hoping for Jason Dominguez. Other than Jason Dominguez you do have a lot of rookies being the Gavin Lux, Bob Vachette, Luis Robert, all that stuff but the big chase in this was Jason Dominguez and still is. Other than that you've also got, I did too, you've also got Robert Flosson, Bobby Whit Jr. Bobby Whit Jr. This is the first product he's in as well so Jason Dominguez it's a Bowman first in this. Bobby Whit Jr. is a Bowman first and so is Robert Flosson. Those are the three bigger ones. There's a couple of guys that are second level like Bayer and Laura, what's the guy's name? Oh, Jaren Duran from Boston, Glenn Allen Hill Jr., Sam Huff, Shirt and Apostle. Those are all really good players too. The Marlins and Brays also have some good ones in here. I mean basically Garza, this is all prospecting. These are all guys that are either in the minor, should be coming up in two years, one year, two years, three years. Yeah, Anthony Volpe, awesome. That's what I like about Bowman is you're prospecting a lot. You can end up with the next Mike Trout, Bowman first auto and have that thing turn into Bowman first specifically, yes. So there's mostly paper in this but there's also chrome. But I mean like I said, you can get rookies in here too. So you can still end up with like a Nico Horner, Jordan Alvarez, Boba Shet, Gavin Lux, all rookies as well. But the Bowman first is what you're looking for in this, that's the big stuff. And then they come in both the paper and the chrome. So obviously the chrome is better. They have refractors, they have numbered, they have all that stuff. So you'll see a lot of the same names as that are in Tops Chrome. So like right here, Boba Shet, Kyle Lewis, both good names, right? And then these ones are the Bowman first. You can see Gerard and Carnassian, he's a very good player. But Robert Poisson is a spectacular player. He might actually be called up this year already. That's a paper. Cal Mitchell, Christian Robinson Atomic, that's not numbered, but nice card. Ravel Garcia, Nico Horner, rookie. Andres Munoz, spanning the globe, refractor. Nick Madrigal, Alex Kiriloff, Eric Pardinho, Shayla Ingliers, Miguel Vargas, Bowman first, chrome. Luis Castillo, Hansa Alberto, Lorenzo Cain, Peter Lonzo. Talent pipeline for the Padres, CJ Abrams, Michael Gettis, and Taylor Tramell. Jacob Avaya, Sam Huff, Bowman first. Cabe Ryan Hayes, Jorge Mateo. Damon Jones, Zach Allen, Andres Munoz, Dylan Cease, Nolan Hernado. Gavin Lux, rookie of the year, favorites, refractor. Shayla Ingliers, Will Wilson, Nick Allen. Ryan Rollison, Ronaldo Hernandez, Brian Reynolds, Willie Calhoun, Logan Allen, Justin Dunn, Luis Petino, Shirt and Apostle, Bowman first paper, Everson Pereira, Tim Cate. Chris Valamont, Isaac Paredes, Trevor Storey, Javier Avayes, Whitmerefield, Christian Yelich. Talent pipeline for the Royals, including Bubeck, Griffin, and Lee. Joey Cantillo, Jackson Rutledge, and Jordan Groeschens. Giorara and Carnassian Crum, Nolan Jones, Xander Bogart, Ronald Acuna Jr., Yu Chang, Tim Anderson, Peter Lonzo, Retro Refractor, Seth Beer, Jaren Duran, it's one of the good ones I was mentioning. Matthew Libertor, Ian Anderson, Brady McConnell, Buster Posey, Noa Mazzara, Junior Fernandez, Tony Gonslin. Joe Adel, Spanning the Globe, he's up in the majors now. Miguel Amaya, Bobby Dahlback, CJ Abrams, Aaron Shortridge, Jesus Sanchez, Starlin Castro, Glaber Torres, George Springer, and Jason Dominguez, that's nice, that's numbered too. Jason Dominguez top 100 prospects, Atomic, numbered to 150. It's kind of what you're looking for Garza. Shane McClanahan, Isaac Peritus, Jonathan India, McKenzie Gore, Alex Kierloff, Oscar Gonzalez, Eduardo Escobar, Joey Vado, Shane Beaver, Cody Bellinger, Jeff McNeil, Brian Mata, Jordan Adams, Colwin, Dane Dunning, Andrew Vaughn, Stud, for the White Sox, that's a refractor numbered to 499. Not a bowman first, but still nice. Jack Flaherty, Alex Young, Adrian Morjean, Seth Brown, Mitch Keller, Oscar Gonzalez, Aramis Aidman, Jorge Mateo, Brady Singer, Tarek Scoogle, Francisco Mejia, and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. You guys breaking anything big on YouTube? I didn't go on there. Yeah. Blonde, we did a, so like, you know how we did a hip parade earlier, basketball? We did like the most steroid version of hip parade possible. It's called Sapphire. And I did the second half of the one-hit case. And I hit an on-card Kobe Auto, numbered to 10 from Flawless. AJ Puck, Bobby Bradley, AJ Puck, Refractor, Retro, Daz Cameron, Ethan Hankins, Drew Mendoza, Luis Robert, Prospect, Daz Cameron, Matt Chapman, Yusaka Kuchy, Juan Soto, Albert Ozale, Isandias, Antonio Cabello, Zach Brown, Leo de Tavares, Estevan Florial, Ryan Mountcastle, Francisco Lindore, Max Muncie, Paul DeYoung, Cabin Vigio, Andres Jimenez, Adley Rushman, Tanner Hoke, Logan Gilbert, Nico Hulsher, Glenn Allen Hill Jr., Sheldon Neuss, Mike Trout, Luis Robert Rookie, PAPER, Austin Nola, Jeter Downs, Brady Singer, Ronnie Mauricio, and Debbie Garcia. Yeah, it was pretty incredible, man. Bayer and Laura, Bowman First. The crazy part about this one, Garza, so everybody chases Bowman First autos, right? He doesn't have autographs in here. And this is his Bowman First. So he will never have Bowman First autos. So his chrome and the colored parallels of this are going to be big cards in the future when he becomes big. Wilfred Austadio, Bryce Harper, Hunter Dozier, Max Scherzer, Jose Altuve. Here's your auto. And it's a purple, which is nice. Thomas Dillard, first baseman outfielder, and that's numbered to 250. For the Brewers, he was the 163rd overall pick in 2019, fifth round pick overall. So you'll have to keep an eye out for him. Ryan Mountcastle, Dane Dunning, Austin Beck, Alec Baum. He just got called up today. He had his first at bat double. Nick Allen, John Means, Dan Vogelbach, Fernand Tattis Jr., Blake Snell, Alec Baum again. Nico Holscher, Tarek Scoogle, Hunter Bishop, Royce Lewis, Matthew Libertor, Michael Baez, Travis Demerit, Rooster Gratterall, Zach Collins, Eugene Chang, Spanning the Globe, Jazz Chisholm, Neon Diaz, Luis Garcia, Brian Campesano, Robert Poisson, Silver. There you go, dude. What's up, Aaron? How are you? Lucas Giulito, Jose Arena, Kettle Marte, Sean Murphy, Dustin May, Rookie of the Year, favorites, Cal Mitchell, Avier, and Ladolo. I slept yesterday, or this morning. Last night, something like that. I got like eight hours of sleep yesterday, guys. It was nice. And I've got all day tomorrow and Saturday off. Yeah, just doing personal's right now. We have a group break that's actually not too far, but it's three spots, so we'll see. Jared Kelleneck, he'll probably be the top rookie next year, guys. Him and Joe Adel. Sam Huff, Bowman First, Chrome, Jordan Yamamoto, Joshua Hiotani, Aaron Judge, Mookie Betts, Logan Allen, Freudus Nova, Bryce Terrain, Clark Schmidt, Dylan Carlson, Eric Pardino, Dustin May, Trent Grisham, Toys A Berrios, Rhys Hoskins, Advert Alsale, Rookie of the Year, Grayson Rodriguez, Rhys Hines, Spencer Howard, Tim Kate, Evan White, Abraham Toro, Aaron Savale, William Domus, Chris Bryant, Peter Lonzo, Purple Paper, to 250. Christian Robinson, Gunner Henderson, Alhuras Montero, Aaron Ashby, Ulrich Bojarski, Jordan Alvarez, and Gavin Lux, Paper Rookies. Ramon Loriano, Mike Yastremski, Ulhuras Montero, Ulrich Bojarski, Jeremy Peña, Luis Garcia, Wanda Franco, Jordan Adams, Aristides Aquino, and Randy Arrena. So you see, you get a lot of stuff, Garza. And a lot of these are like Bowman first players and stuff like that. So, Jeff, bought into the Bowman Tops Chrome Mixer first time breaking here. How do I know when it's full? Let me close out this video real quick. And that was a 2020 Bowman baseball hobby personal box available on jaspys.com for Manuel. I'm Sean with jaspyscasebreaks.com or group and case breaks and jaspys.com for all personal breaks. And we'll see you next time.


Hi everyone, Joe for jasphyscasebreaks.com coming at you with jasphys big hit express multi-sport product Our very own repack product series four. This seems to be the best series. Yeah, they keep getting better and better This is break number five There's all some more details right there Pretty good pretty good stuff so far. I think we're already backed up to break number 15 ladies and gentlemen, so We might be able to do our entire 30 case print run Right there. All right big. Thanks all of these folks right here and congrats to Jeff for winning that spot in the previous break There's everybody here. There's all the teams here. There's the remaining cases right there and We'll randomize each list four or two six times one two three four five six six in final time after six we've got Wes down to Rory four and a six for the teams and Sixth and final time after six. We've got the angels spot Down to the Pelican spot Jeff P saying he thinks Zion is due. All right, so there's First half of the list right there and I'll alphabetize it by your first names in just a moment There you go and what if it If Jeff pieces right that Rory would be very happy to get the to get that Zion All right, let's sort by column a So there's all your spots right there Brian has the hockey spot up for trade if anybody's interested So there's all your everyone by their first names right here George's group of teams Jeff with the spot that he won Jeremy so on and so forth. Good luck everybody and there you go All right Now four to two six times for the case numbers Sixth and final time after six Congrats to box number four You've made it to the big leagues. You're up next box four. All right, there you go I'm gonna pause the video allow for a little bit of trade talk and then when we come back We'll have the break going stick around BRB All right, we're back a little bit of trade chatter But no deals were done. It's okay. Here is the official print out Thanks everyone for getting into the action really appreciate it Thanks for hanging with us spending your Friday with us. I appreciate that So this looks the same as what you saw on the previous screen just officially printed out. Let's help set the shipping team Alright There's break or a case form here in break five All right. Good luck everybody First one is gonna be Aaron Donald nice five out of 20 from flawless Good-looking two-color patch right there rams That will be Tom Tom with the rams next up We have ooh city of gold Zach Levine 38 out of 79 for the bulls Chris Chris Bonewell with the bulls chiefs Orioles combo You had a mock draft for your for the WMBA and statue Savali going number two just screws up your You think you think the you think the Dallas wings Stretched on that. You don't think she should go that high. I think that's a it's a reach. Yes, it's a reach Devonte Graham already graded for you PSA 10 on that one nice one for the Hornets Pink parallel hyper Pretty good break number five. This is break number five Rory. Who do you have? Nobody? Not a good team terrible team for you It's no good. No good team. Don't worry about it Rory. It's not gonna happen Morgan Hubbard with the Charlotte Hornets all right next one is Paris Campbell will always have Paris nice camel refractor got his autograph the Jaspy sticker on top Nine out of 25. Yes, even punk thinks he's gonna have 14 double-digit TDs not a lot of receivers get double-digit In a single season, right? I don't think Julio even had Who had double a lot of people get double-digit TDs Avery with the Colts there you go Avery 12 though 14 he's a 12 to 14 You think he's walked it back to 12 I saw recently 12 All right next one Max Kepler 7 out of 10 from archives and that'll be Marco Mills with the twins there you go Marco graded Is this good? Oh, oh From 2019 2020 Panini prism basketball It's silver Graded a 9-5 Centering a 9 corners a 10 Edges 9-5 surface 9-5 Silver Zion Williamson for the pelicans Not even on the cell sheet And that goes to who's got the pelicans in this break Joe Jaspy nice. Good job, Joe Rory Wagner gets it Yeah, I was Rory. Oh my god. It's Rory You got it Rory. Congrats, man Rory Wagner, that's right No, he really does have pelicans jets combo. Yeah, it's right on the list All right, and we got Steph Curry rookie Steph Curry. That's pretty cool Centering corner surface all the 9-5 edges are a 9 from upper deck and the last one here ladies and gentlemen Wait, do we have a train whistle this way? Is this it? It is. Oh nice From Bowman old Bowman Sterling, that's Will Myers. Yeah One-of-one Super Fracture rookie revelations will Myers raise edition and Tampa Bay That goes to Brock Simon There you go. So Brock All aboard the big hit express Nice finish good train whistle to close things out Empty box Thanks, everyone Apologies to those who went hitless but This group has a shot at winning a spot in the next break All right, so new dice. Let's roll it. Let's randomize it nine times three and a six name on top gets it One two three four five six seven eight and Ninth and final time after nine times Name on top is gonna be Matt Medlin. Congrats to you Matt We'll put the little rooftop symbol next to your name So you win a spot in the very next break. I'm Joe. I'll see you next time. We got some more. Bye. Bye


Right now Rich Lux is being accused of being a racist and the whole drama channel community might be in trouble. But before we start this video, as many of you know, I wrote a book called Canceled Inside YouTube Canceled Culture where I share my own experience and I wanted to start this video out with an excerpt from my book. I fancied myself as a humble individual but I wasn't humble enough. I needed to up my game quite a bit and maybe the backlash wouldn't have been as bad as it eventually became. One of the reasons I want to talk about this is to have it be a cautionary tale for anyone on the come up out there. Don't be like me. Never think you're invincible. There are a few exceptions to the rule but for the most part the community can humble us if we don't get humble ourselves. If you don't believe me, look what happened to James Charles. His situation reminded me a lot of my own. I could tell that he felt invincible too and he was much more invincible than me but the mob had no problem coming after him. What is up everybody? This is Chris from The Rewired Soul where we talk about the problem but focus on the solution. And if you're new to my channel what I try to do is take different topics going on in the YouTube community and try to see what lessons we can learn from them to improve our own mental and emotional well-being. So if you're into that stuff make sure you subscribe and ring that notification bell. So before we jump into this topic two quick things. One of them is do me a favor go watch the video I did yesterday about James Charles versus Teaseville and the drama channels. I put a lot of work into that and if you're into psychology and philosophy you will love that video. So do me a favor after this video go check that one out. It'll be linked up in the info card. I'll put it down in the description below as well. Second thing I'll be talking about this from the perspective as of somebody who is half African American. All right and obviously my perspective is going to be different than someone like Earth Mova or even Petty Page because as you've noticed I don't look half Black and I think there's a lot of good conversations coming up but we need to discuss kind of what's going on and how we're having these conversations. So those of you who have no idea what's going on quick little recap. I made a more in-depth video about this the other day but a very small YouTuber by the name of Earth Mova just got a bunch of conversation going at the time of recording her video. She had about 600 subscribers and now I think she's 1100 or so but anyways she was basically doing what drama channels do and she shared her opinions about people like Rich Lux, The Viewer's Voice, Petty Page just Dustin Daly and you know some others. And yeah the drama community jumped on her. All right like I am so glad that she's bringing this up and having this conversation like what I've talked about before is in the mainstream media like we know about the bias like it's very clear like if you watch CNN or MSNBC very clear liberal bias if you watch Fox News very conservative bias same thing is happening in the drama community. There are certain people like Jeffrey Starr who they will not criticize and I for me that was one of the main points of Earth Mova's video but she also brought up some things about you know racism and things like that but anyways at the time of recording like I said she has 600 subscribers and all these huge drama channels jumped on her and it was kind of like the Barbara Streisand effect all right those of you who don't know what that is so long time ago just long story short Barbara Streisand people found out where her house was and she didn't want people to know where her house was so she made a huge deal about it a huge deal and when she made a huge deal a bunch of people came looking for her house and found it all right so this is known as the Barbara Streisand effect like there's something very small that not many people know about and then you use your platform to bring attention to it and then that's when it becomes a big deal and in my opinion I feel that's what these drama channels did like their their pride their ego was hurt so much by this smaller channel calling them out on some things that maybe maybe they may feel is a little bit true that they felt the need to respond but here's the issue here's where this became an issue and like I said in the intro where I talked about that excerpt from my book is thinking you're invincible so this whole thing started where Rich Lux tweeted this out but which is now deleted but everybody has a screenshot of it is where he labels earth mother as a stalker and as a racist all right he throws these very strong labels on her and although earth mother brought up topics about race and you can correct me if I'm wrong down in the comments below and please give me a timestamp but I don't believe that earth mother called anybody a racist except for alluring to jeffree star being a racist but anyways rich lux took these very strong labels and slapped them on earth mother a stalker and a racist but within 24 hours within 24 hours this clip came up understanding a racist well girl you know what first of all and not that he is but if he was and ain't nothing wrong with being a racist girl being a racist is frowned upon no one likes a racist but last time I checked it's not illegal to be a racist there are people there are people out there who are loud and proud that they're racist all day long so yeah now that clip has been going around since then rich lux is losing some subscribers petty page found a different clip where he cleared it up the following day um but yeah like the damage has been done so real quick do I think that rich lux is a racist no I try to live by hamlin's razor and the reason I do that is because I wish people would do that for me all right so hamlin's razor for those of you who don't know it says do not attribute to malice which could easily be attributed to stupidity all right I think what rich said was dumb I think a lot of us can agree what he said was dumb but is he a racist I don't think so all right but this happens all the time especially in the you know with all the youtube drama that's constantly happening people do they make dumb decisions and we immediately think like oh that makes them a bad person the reality is a bunch of people just do really stupid stuff we all think that we're so smart and we and we make these great decisions all the time the problem is is that we do a lot of very dumb things good people do dumb things rich lux did a very dumb thing but like I said earth mother is bringing up a very good point that I think people need to be discussing a little bit more and it's something I discussed a little bit in that video from yesterday about James Charles versus the drama channels there is a very clear bias there is a clear bias and earth mother made a follow-up video I'll link it down in the description below where she talks about like if you want to be a loyal friend like be a loyal friend and just say yo this is my friend I'm not going to talk bad about them you know what I mean but the problem is is that they won't outwardly say that so it just looks very bias and very hypocritical like if your friends with someone like Jeffree Star cool do you baby girl be friends with that dude all right some people may disagree with it or whatever but like the way that the drama channels kind of operate is they try to minimize anything that Jeffree Star does and more and more people are starting to notice how this is you know a problem so the last thing I want to talk about is earth mother and just kind of my opinions on this and I've talked to her in DMs and everything like that like I'm glad that people like her and Sherita explains it all are having these conversations there's some other youtubers who are having these conversations like I think one of the reasons this story has blown up is because everybody wants this drama to be light and fluffy like oh that's a bad friend that's a bad friend oh just bad friends right and they're bringing up more serious topics such as racism a little misogyny and things like that and like these are things that people don't want to talk about but I'm grateful that people like earth mother and others are talking about this like these are things that we don't just ignore them and just pretend like they don't happen but I do have a theory I have a theory that a lot of people watch the drama channels so they don't have to think about the serious subjects hell if I'm being honest I think that was part of the issue I ran into I was trying to bring in a serious topic like mental health and intertwine it with YouTube drama and people don't want that people want drama to be light and fluffy so although I do love that earth mother is bringing up these topics as well as others like I do disagree with her on one thing right so something that she talks about is you know people even wanting to talk to Jeffree Star with his history of you know racist remarks and things like that that's something that I disagree with that we shouldn't have conversations like there is there's a story and I can't remember the guy's name off the top of my head but he's a black man and he he went around there's a documentary on it he went around meeting with KKK members right and this is something that is huge it's powerful right because the thing is and a lot of you know like I've been really getting into like group psychology and moral psychology and everything like that we need to have conversations with people we disagree with one of the things is one of the issues when it comes to racism when it comes to a lot of these like group mentalities and everything like that is dehumanization right not even considering the other person as a human there's a study and I might do a whole video on it but they had people rave like you know how human do you consider these different ethnicities right and like it's really scary man it it's scary like oh you know these people are less human like what like what so when you start having these conversations you might start changing the perception of other people so um Andrew Yang was trending on twitter yesterday because uh real quick story one of the guys who just got hired for saturday night live the new season some clips of him uh came up where he was making some uh pretty racist remarks about asian people in america and it started this huge backlash and Andrew Yang said yo I'm willing to sit down with this guy right and that's huge that's huge but what I will say is this when it comes to earth mother I think she is right in the in the aspect of like I I don't think anybody was trying to sit down with Jeffrey star and have a conversation about these things like uh Shane Dawson did during that documentary but in just in my opinion and I might be wrong but I don't think I am uh I don't think it's about any of these drama channels having a conversation with Jeffrey star about um those remarks he made I think it's about clout you know what I mean like I really don't think in my opinion I don't think that Jeffrey star any other influencer like Trisha Paytas or anybody pays these drama channels because they don't have to you guys like listen in in this in the youtube community like money is not even as valuable as clout you know what I mean and I've said this in other videos like the influencers know this like they're playing the game they're like okay you know I'm buddy up with these drama channels they'll back off me a little bit that's cool you know what I mean so I'm glad this topic's being brought up but like I really hope um you know people pay attention like like it's crazy because a lot of people from that community who heard about my book cancelled or read my book they say things like I uh you know I have no self-awareness I I took no accountability or anything like that but a lot of my book is a cautionary tale all right I have changed the way I do my commentary and stuff like that because I know how things can spiral out of control and turn into cancel culture so like like I said a lot of these um drama channels think they're invincible and they sit on Twitter all day long just just openly talking crap to people and I don't know I think something's stirring up and maybe they'll humble themselves before the community humbles them you know what I mean anyways let me know your thoughts on this down in the comments below if you like this video please give it a thumbs up if you're new make sure you subscribe and ring that notification bell and don't forget to watch the video I did yesterday on James Charles versus drama channels might blend some philosophy and psychology all right but I want to send a huge thank you to everybody who supports the channel over on Patreon and everybody who supports the channel in other ways like buying my books and merch and stuff like that I appreciate you all right thanks again for watching I'll see you next time