My biggest injury would be to my right knee which happened about four years ago I started getting pain in it and I pushed through when I probably should have stopped and it led to four years of chronic pain So every morning every night waking up in pain and that really did a lot to my mind I went through some tough times, but the biggest thing that I learned from it Was that I just have to accept it when I stopped actually suffering from the pain and just actually accepted that This was going to potentially be in my life That was when I had the breakthrough and was able to to manage the pain rather than resist it One idea that I have always had is that life isn't happening to you. You are creating it So what I mean by that is I guess You are what you think about often the more negative thoughts that you have The more negative your life is going to turn out And so I always try and think as positive as I can even in the really tough Situations that's been one of my strengths. I guess in the team especially and my mom I guess growing up kind of installed that in me because she taught me about the law of attraction Which is basically this idea that your thoughts become your actions and your actions become things So what I would do is always just tell her put it out put it out there to anyone who would listen What I actually wanted in my life and often people would call me the luckiest person because I'd always be winning things or Getting things or making teams, but I really wouldn't put it down to luck I would actually put it down to putting it out there and you know, what's the worst that that can go wrong Playing hockey at the top level you do have to deal with the pressure and we do get a lot of comments saying You know You're gonna choke this time and that really plays on your head a little bit But I guess the biggest thing that I learned about dealing with pressure is that instead of trying to do something different Try to try too hard You just have to let it go and let it happen the biggest tip that I could give is is to deal with pressure as mindfulness So the whole idea I know it's been thrown out there But it is being used by the top athletes in the world Sciences backed it up as well, and it's the whole idea of training your mind to be in the present moment So that's not being distracted by your thoughts or feelings or emotions, which obviously under pressure It kind of gets sped up a lot But yeah, it's not focusing on the past because you can't change it's not focusing on the future because you're not there yet So often you're looking at the score Or the all the time on the clock or you're thinking about a past mistake you've made But for me being able to practice mindfulness means that I can just be in the game and just focus on my role Not get distracted by anyone else and that really helps me get calm and get focused because I think when you resist or You put too much pressure on yourself. That's when things go wrong I often think a lot about what you can control and what you can't control Often we spend a lot of time especially as a sports person living in that box of Uncontrollables, you know the ref what the opposition are doing the weather How hot it is all of these things that you just have absolutely no control over and it does no good So what I think is that we need to try and spend most of the time in the control box Which you know you can control yourself your thoughts your what you say what you do and if you actually make that switch You're actually be aware of these two boxes even to begin with that's a really good step in being able to manage Obviously the things that are within your control. It's not only in a game when I'm talking about how what you can control But it's everywhere. It's how you deal with failure. I mean over at the Olympics We lost our semi-final against Great Britain and we had one day to get over it to play the bronze medal match Which is the single most important game that we played and so I had a choice I could stay in the past thinking about all the mistakes I'd made or I could quickly move on learn those lessons, but move on and focus on the next game So I think when we're talking about what you can control. We often just keep replaying situations on our head Which do us no good whatsoever. I mean it is important to learn those lessons from your mistakes But the more we dwell on them the more harm it's going to cause Why is such a big word? It's thrown around a lot But I think it's probably the most important question to keep asking yourself You know, what's your why? I think often when we get in these really tough situations You have to really hold on to that And if it's not a bigger reason if it's nothing Special or outside of yourself if it's a selfish reason I think that the the more likely you are just to be on the wrong path so I think the purpose of Having a strong sense of why is that when you do get into the situations where you're not sure if you can go On or not believe me. I've been in many of those you have that as kind of a guidance Don't mean to be cliche, but like a torch in the dark, you know, you can actually steer yourself in the direction You want but for a purpose. I like to say, you know, it's on purpose versus off purpose Sometimes I know that a lot of the time we walk around like on autopilot We do things but we're kind of not sure why we do them and I think being taking switching off autopilot and taking control and Knowing why you're doing things is a really big reason that I think everyone should should reflect on themselves I could continue you're just being an athlete and that's that's great It's a big a big job But what I've found is I've launched this new initiative Which is actually helping high school athletes try to balance their lives socially mentally and physically and I went through all of that not so long ago and by helping them It's given me a greater sense of purpose There was a lot of times when I was launching my business that I had these doubts because obviously putting my name out there and Starting a business, you know, who am I to be teaching these kids? That's what was going on in my head It was a lot of getting outside my comfort zone and I had to keep reminding myself and bringing myself back to You know that why why am I doing this and it's because I want to help and and pass on these skills to potentially have a life-changing effect on these these girls and having the right attitude Definitely helps you get outside your comfort zone and that's where the magic happens


Okay, here we are. So we got the Peg 36 Trail, the Terra Kiger 5, and the Wild Horse 5. I'm gonna do my best not to turn this into a comparison video. Gentlemen, here we are. My first impressions of the Nike Pegasus 36 Trail. These are my first steps. I haven't run in these shoes yet. And this is a new, a reinvented, I should say, trail running shoe from Nike. Let's rock and roll. First impressions, ready to go. Okay, oh man. So first thoughts is good cushion through the heel. Really good cushion through the heel. It's feeling real nice. I do know that they put some beefed up lugs on the bottom of the outsole. I'm not sure how tall they are exactly. I'm guessing, I'm guessing four millimeters, but I'll measure those for you later. And man, comfortable. Very comfortable so far, but I will say, I think everyone's probably a little confused between what trail shoe to go with from Nike, the Wild Horse 5, the Terra Kiger 5, or the Peg 36 Trail. So we will answer those questions for you down the road, but all right, what else is going on? I'm just feeling out the shoes, feeling them out. Nice cushion, again, through that heel. So it's got the air pockets in the heel and the forefoot just so you know what Nike's known for. So maybe that's what I'm feeling springy. I'm feeling springy. All right, let's rock and roll.  Okay, it's pretty windy out, so we're not gonna do too much talking out here, but hold on one second. All right, here we go. We got the Peg 36 Trail. First impressions, we've got the Wild Horse 5 and yes, the Terra Kiger 5. I'm gonna do my best not to turn this into a comparison video. We'll probably do that five to seven days from now, but rather stick to my first gut reaction to how the Peg 36 Trails did today out on some pretty amazing trails here in Colorado. Let's just say I'm a little surprised if not shocked. A little, I was not expecting what I got out of this guy today. All right, let's go break it down in the studio. And welcome to the studio, everybody. I hope you're doing well. If this is your first time on this YouTube channel, thanks for stopping by. Just so you know, this is not a strictly a running shoe review YouTube channel. This is a daily running vlog channel. Hence the style of filming that you saw out on the mountains today. You're gonna get a lot of that. If you, yes, I'll just invite you right now. If you hit that subscribe button, I'd appreciate it. But basically like, I film beauty. I like to really try and tell a visual story through my, whether it's a running shoe first impression, whether it's a racing vlog, whether it's a training vlog, what have you. So anyway, I just appreciate you stopping by if this is your first time here. All right, let's dive in to my first impressions of the Nike Pegasus 36 Trail. And I should also mention this is not N-O-T, not my full review. That will happen after 50 miles. All right, so here we go. First of all, you need to know it is a neutral trail running shoe. What does that mean? There's no stability built into the midsole. In fact, I would say it's one of the most nimble and loosey-goosey midsole I've ever seen in a trail running shoe. So if you need help with prone overpronation, supination through your foot strike, this is not the trail running shoe for you. And moving on to the drop. So it's a 10 millimeter drop from heel to toe. Pretty standard for Nike shoes these days. I like 10 millimeters for going uphill. We'll talk more about how this performed today on uphill, on the uphill work. But anyway, 10 millimeters, it felt pretty good. Usually I'm in the six to eight millimeter range as my favorite range for the offset or the drop. And for the weight, we're looking at 8.6 ounces or 244 grams. Great weight for a trail shoe. Most trail running shoes that I own are at least nine and a half and usually over 10 ounces in my sizing. So great work, Nike, creating a lightweight, daily trail running shoe. And moving on to that upper, first impression, a lot of good things happening. I'll just say, very comfortable. There's no other way to say it. It's a mesh upper, completely redesigned. And but what I'm probably most excited about, oh, there's a couple of things. I guess, okay, the skin overlays over the toe box to help keep the rain out, the puddles out, maybe even creek crossings to a certain extent. It's also here through the eyelet system. They just did a nice job trying to keep as much moisture out while still allowing the toe box to breathe through those hot summer runs. But look at this, the tongue on the Peg 36 trail is pretty thin. And you know my concerns about the Vemero 14 tongue. So this is thin, but it's a little more padding than the Vemero 14 tongue. So it felt amazing today when I laced it up. It just gave a nice lockdown feel, combining the tongue with a fly wire system that what Nike is known for now, this fly wire, just to help your midfoot really lock down into the shoe. So overall through the midfoot, or sorry, through the upper, really on point Nike with what you're doing there. And moving on to that midsole, oh, good things as well. So Cushlon foam from heel to toe versus, okay, I know I wasn't gonna mention the Terra Kyger five today, but the Terra Kyger five mixes different foams into their midsole, not the case with the Pegasus 36 trail, same foam all through the midsole. And then also zoom air units, one in the heel and one in the forefoot spot on, very comfortable, didn't feel too bubbly, like too much air in there. You know what I mean? It just was a nice cushioned ride out on the trails. And then onto the outsole. I was actually not correct today about the depth of the lugs. So the outsole pattern, you can see it there on your screen. These lugs are actually, I measured them. They're about two to three millimeters. I thought they were closer to four to five millimeters when I bought the shoe. So I prefer four to five, even six for a trail shoe, but that's okay. I think what Nike is going for is that crossover between really buffed out trails, almost like dirt roads. And if you're commuting to a trail run, meaning you're running on pavement or cement or concrete to get to the trails, you're gonna be able to pull it off very easily in the shoe because the depth of the lugs is not very high. So anyway, I'm measuring about two to three millimeters for that lug depth. And a couple of positives, real quick, very comfortable. And this heel counter is spot on.  Oh, so comfortable, amazing Nike. Good work again, once again, on the upper comfort. And one quick drawback, I'm actually already noticing a little bit of compression through the midsole. So I'm hoping that the durability of this midsole doesn't break down too quickly, considering it is a trail shoe. And here in Colorado, we have a lot of aggressive trails with lots of rocks, roots, like you're not, you're beating up your shoes out there on the trail. So anyway, that's one little drawback so far. Talked to me after 50 miles and I just hope that the pop and the cushion doesn't escape the midsole too quickly. And moving on to the good stuff. All right, how do the shoe actually feel and perform on the trails today? Ladies and gentlemen, ridiculously comfortable. Like, I'm actually shocked. I'm shocked at how comfortable the shoe is. Compared to the Pegasus 36 Road, it's different. It's just very, very different. I was pleasantly surprised. As you know, like I've struggled with injuries in the past and it's far as like protecting my legs and my feet out on the trails during high volume months of running at, you know, in the hot summer months, like I am bullish, I'm bullish on this shoe for absorbing some of that pounding on those rocks, on those hard packed trails compared to and it has the 10 millimeter drop compared to let's say some ultra shoes that are zero drop and I feel like ultra is amazing but a lot of ultra shoes have a nice good cushion dried but you have to deal with zero drop shoes. So anyway, very comfortable. I'm excited. I'm beyond excited. I'll just put it that way. And, but there is a little, okay. As far as performance drawback on these steep uphill sections, I did feel like the midsole was just a little too mushy. I was actually thinking about on my run today. Gosh, I kind of wish I had the Solomon speed cross five on my foot with just a little firmer midsole. So I don't think that this shoe will be the best for steep uphill trail running, just so you know. And, but anyway, great lockdown feel, incredible comfort through the midsole but I'm wondering if it's gonna be best suited for trail running that doesn't go over 500 feet of vertical gain, maybe 750 feet total just because I just felt like I was working a little too hard on the uphill sections. And, and, and as far as grip, like I wasn't slipping around at all. Granted, I wasn't going very fast today. So stay tuned to see how it does on faster speeds, especially on the downhill sections. All right, there we go. Key word is trail. That's right. Cause we took it out on the trail today. So excited to be back out on the trails as I continue to come back from my injury. And yes, question of the day, it's gonna be the exact same, hold on, the exact same question of the day that I asked after my first impression of the road version of the Pegasus 36. What on a scale of one to 10, what is your interest level in picking up the Nike Pegasus 36 trail? Mention down below one through 10, where do you fall on the scale? That would be amazing because again, this is a reinvented version of the Nike Pegasus trail lineup. And so maybe you totally forgot about this lineup from Nike and frankly, like I said earlier, I've never run in this lineup before. So I'm bullish, excited, really excited. Because, okay, one more point. I have a lot of ultra shoes and I have a lot of Solomon shoes. Solomon's like aggressive, high altitude, big rocks.  Whereas this guy I could see will be that happy medium between Solomon and ultra. You hear what I'm saying? So anyway, good job, Nike so far. All right, that is it for tonight. Thank you for being here. Thank you for watching my first impressions of the Nike Pegasus 36 trail. And again, if you're new and you like today's video, make sure you hit that subscribe button so you don't miss tomorrow's vlog and the next vlog and the next vlog. All right, seek beauty, work hard. Love each other, sweet mom. Oh, good times. Good times. Good times. See you tomorrow.


This video is brought to you by Paramount Plus. Hey, Griff, get over here! We're supposed to recap the latest episodes of Halo! Yeah, I'm coming! Hang on. What's up? How are you out of breath? You just came from right over there, and you stopped to pick a dandelion! Yeah, well, for your information, I ran earlier. When? Uh, fifth grade? P.E.? Yep. Jim Clash here is important for kids. He teaches essential parachute flapping skills, a new social concept like embarrassment. Heh. I love making fun of nerds. So, do you want to start the recap? Ugh! Gimme a minute. I forgot I'm allergic to dandelions. Ugh! Ugh, fine. Okay, so episode six starts with Master Chief in a bad way. He's really going through it, and Cortana's acting like a cheeky narrator, contradicting everything he says. How you feeling, Master Chief? I'm fine. He wasn't. Master Chief is so rattled, he plays Radiation Chicken with Dr. Halsey to test Cortana's limits and get more answers about his past. Mmm, delicious Radiation Chicken! Drumsticks the size of a dentist racket! You can handle the tooth and hair loss? Mmm, mmm, that is good eatin'! Speaking of toxicity, Master Chief and McKee, the Covenant Spy, discover their profound connection and bond over the trauma caused by the artifacts. I sense a troubled, codependent relationship blossoming. After Master Chief plays Bad Cop, Bad Cop with Dr. Halsey, the Admiral fires her and promotes Dr. Keyes. The episode ends with Master Chief and McKee having a contest to see who can have the wettest eyes without crying. And then Master Chief touches the artifact again, sending him and McKee to a beautiful hillside that looks like my desktop background.  Episode seven takes us back to Quan Han, Soren's adventures. While Soren is having an intergalactic met gala in his asteroid condo, Quan is out to find those desert mystics. I guess she's still sore about missing out on doing all those drugs in episode one, because if you want a wild trip, you gotta find desert mystics. Remember, kids, if you're offered a strange liquid in a tent, you're about to embark on a psychedelic journey. Quan drinks the mystic juice and begins to hallucinate big time. I remember the last time I did hallucinogens. Failed a drug test with flying colors. During her trip, Quan is visited by her father, who tells her about a secret portal on Madrigal and gives her advice on how to beat Venture. How come everyone always learns important stuff while tripping? It's always, here's how to overcome your biggest obstacle and never, these lights look cooler and my friends are really funny. Speaking of friends in high places, Soren hears the bounty on Quan has tripled and goes to Madrigal to help her out. Venture and his gang corner them in the city, and while Soren is cutting through henchmen like a hot plasma sword through butter, Quan turns on the hydrogen pump to blow the place to kingdom calm. Yeah, they set the whole compound to Hindenburg and turned Venture into a smoldering pile of posh cinders. Man, I was really hoping we'd get to see those little red glasses smoking on the ground. In episode eight, we're back with Master Chief and McKee who are having a perfume commercial romance in their Halo dreamscape. It's a lot more caressing than I'd pictured in a Halo show, but you know what? I'm here for it. If you had tasteful sex scene on your Halo Bingo card, you're in luck. Also, a little weird that you had that. Ah! Bingo! Wait, you do? Nope, I have mention of Halo Bingo card and my red versus blue recap Bingo card. That's Bingo squared. Meanwhile, Dr. Halsey, who I'm convinced has never taken a day off in her life, is still up to here with machinations and executes protocol Z, or Zed, if you're of the British persuasion. That lady puts the Q in cuckoo and turns the other Spartans against the Master Chief and attempts to escape with McKee and the artifacts. Sound the lunk alarm because Vanak and Riz go beast mode on Master Chief and toss him around the gym like a sweaty towel. I don't think I'll go to a gym ever again or before. In the end, just as they're about to put Master Chief down for good, McKee gets her hands on the other Keystone, which emits an energy blast that knocks everyone out and shuts down all of Fleetcom. Ooh, major cliffhanger. Kind of like this! Will the Master Chief stop Halsey and rescue McKee?  Will the Fleetcom collapse? Will Griff's teammates rescue him from this dizzying precipice? Find out all this, except the last one on the season finale of Halo on Paramount+.


Hello, students. It's Shayna, your teacher from EspressoEnglish.net. And in today's lesson, I want to teach you some phrases that you can use in a specific situation. And that is, when you want to say something, but you're not completely certain that it's correct. So a lot of English learners, they stay quiet because they don't want to say something and then maybe they're wrong and other people will react badly to that. But there are a few different phrases that we can actually use to show that we are saying something that we believe to be true, but we recognize that we might be wrong and we are open to correction. So let's say you and your friends are talking about the date of an upcoming concert and you think you know when the date is, but you're not 100% sure. Instead of just saying the concert is on March 15th, you could say, if I'm not mistaken, the concert is on March 15th. That little phrase, if I'm not mistaken, is just a way to show that you could be making a mistake. It's possible that you are not correct and you are open to somebody else correcting you. Another phrase you can use for the same situation is, as far as I know. So if you're talking about an acquaintance who lives in the area, but maybe some time ago she was thinking about moving somewhere else and the people who you're talking with, they're not sure if she's still here, if she has moved out of the area, you could say, well, as far as I know, she still lives here because you haven't heard anything about her definitely moving. So you are pretty certain that she is still in the area, but you could be wrong. It's possible that she moved and she didn't tell you. So you say, as far as I know, she's still in the area. Another phrase for it is, to the best of my knowledge. And again, this is used to show that you think something is true, but you recognize that your knowledge might not be complete. You could be wrong. To the best of my knowledge is a little more formal. In everyday spoken English, we would probably stick with the previous two phrases as far as I know and if I'm not mistaken. One more phrase for you, and that is in the form of a question. We use this when you are pretty sure you are correct, but again, there's always that little chance that you are making a mistake. And we could say, correct me if I'm wrong, but, and then ask a question. And we usually make this a negative question. So let's say you're in a conversation about some actor, a famous actor, and the other people are saying how they love this actor's Australian accent, but you think the actor is from New Zealand, not Australia, and you're pretty sure. You could say, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't he from New Zealand, not Australia? You are expressing what you believe to be true, but you are not doing it in an arrogant way. So you're not just coming in and saying, you're wrong. He's from New Zealand, not Australia. You're expressing it a little bit more politely. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't he from New Zealand? So we use correct me if I'm wrong with the negative question. Again, to express something that we are fairly confident is true, but there's always that chance that we might be the ones who are mistaken. And then what do you do if you, if you say something like this, if I'm not mistaken as far as I know, to the best of my knowledge, correct me if I'm wrong, and you actually are wrong, or if you've said something and someone else corrects you and says, no that's not true, the correct date for the concert is March 20th, or no this actor was born in New Zealand but grew up in Australia, so his accent is Australian. You can say, oh, I stand corrected. This is an informal way to say, oops, I was wrong, and now you have corrected me. I stand corrected, meaning that what you said was not correct, was not right, and now you know the correct fact. Okay, so you know, I think one of the worst things when you're learning a language is being in a situation and not knowing what to say. As I mentioned, a lot of English learners just stay quiet in this situation, but that's not good because you need to practice, you need to interact to improve your English. So I created the everyday English speaking courses to help you know exactly what to say in various situations. These courses will teach you the real phrases that native English speakers use in all sorts of situations and in informal conversations. So these are phrases and expressions that you might not find in regular English textbooks. The course comes with text and audio, so you can practice listening, you can practice repeating, you can read the text, and some of the lessons also include speaking tasks where you can actually record your speaking and send it to me for evaluation. You can click on the link in the video or in the video description for more information about that course as well as some free samples, and I would love to see you join the everyday English speaking course. So many of my students have benefited greatly from it, and I hope you'll become one of them as well.


from Boston, Massachusetts. It's theCUBE, covering WTG Transform 2019. Brought to you by Winslow Technology Group. Welcome back, I'm Stu Miniman and we're at WTG Transform 2019 here in Boston, Massachusetts. Happy to welcome back to the program the CTO of Winslow Technology Group. Rick Gallin spoke to the customers this morning, threw out a bunch of data points, got us all thinking about where we are today and where we're going tomorrow in the cloud. Rick, thanks so much for joining us. Hey, thanks for having me. All right, so Rick, you and I, we've known each other for a few years now, we have these great debates as to kind of, you know, where we are and where we're going. I attended a Nutanix event a couple of years ago and Naseeb Talib, who is the author of a number of books including Black Swan and Anti-Fragile, he worked on Wall Street and he said, look, we all try to make these predictions, but we think it's going to be a line or maybe there'll be slow adoption, but the Black Swan that he said is something, you know, just a quick thing is, if you've never seen a Black Swan, you think that all swans are white. And once you've seen a Black Swan, you're like, oh my God, everything that I thought I knew, I have to think into questions. So predicting the future, especially in a never changing world where we don't have all the facts and we can't predict is really challenging. So understanding whether cloud will take, you know, 80% of the market or 30% of the market in the next five years is a little bit of a complex thing. It's like trying to predict the weather here in New England, you know, where we're watching the clouds and the rain roll in and roll out. So start with us as to, you know, Winslow technology, your customers, where they are with cloud and how that conversation goes with them today. Yeah, yeah, so I think, you know, you make a great point about these statistics, these assertions, these predictions. We're getting bombarded with them without context. And I think that it leaves a lot of our customers feeling like they're behind the curve a little bit because you're bandy about the, you know, you'll hear 80% of cloud, companies have a cloud strategy and, you know, there's never the follow up to see, did it change two weeks later? Was it actually implemented? And so, you know, I think that what we can all agree on is that one, all of these technologies are going to continue to grow right there adoption is going to continue to grow. We're going to continue to figure out different ways to extract value from those services. But the other part of this, and I think it's really where Winslow fits in, is that we want to help our customers position themselves to take advantage of that. So I want to help our customers transform what they're doing today. If we look out, you know, at that three, at that five year mark, we know that we're going to have a lot of workloads out there. I don't know what the percentage is going to be. I'm not going to throw a fake number out there, but we know that it's going to be bigger than the one today. And we also, I would assert that there are things we can help you do in your on-prem environment today that will help make you better prepared for that transition and allow you to attack that, hopefully in a more strategic and well considered way. Yeah, absolutely. Well, Rick, I am very sure 87% of all statistics lie. And beyond that, I would poke and prod at any numbers that I see there because look, numbers are numbers. And as you said, right, I think things do change all the time. Context. You know, when I look at some of the tailwinds that have been driving your business the last few years, hyper-converged infrastructure, some of the services wrapping around to help customers with their security journey, with their cloud journey. You've got a number of partners that are there. The bombardment that your customers get, it doesn't stop. You know, if they open up, you know, they open up the news today.  So the thing, I'll poke a little bit at, I don't mind that customers think they're a little bit far behind because what they need to be doing is being that change mindset because the worst thing they can do is just say, well, I've got it the way I want it and I'm not going to change. And I think that that's something that you would agree with and that Winslow's helping them to try to keep up because nobody can keep up by themselves so they've got to be able to turn to partners like yourself to keep up. Yeah, you know, I think one of the things that was telling that I touched on earlier today a little bit was the number three reason that we heard from our customers for why they weren't leveraging the public cloud was because they didn't know how. And I think that that's telling, I think that, you know, sort of responds to the whole notion that they're feeling behind the curve. But I also feel like you mentioned Hyperconverged, you mentioned some of these other partners we work with. These guys all have some great stories that will allow our customers to take a first step, right? What we're not talking about is saying, hey customers, you've got to re-platform everything. You've got to rewrite everything to leverage all these different cloud services and cloud platforms. You know, that's a big lift for a lot of our customers. But what might not be such a huge lift is leveraging some of those, you know, cloud services, cloud connectivity capabilities that are built into those platforms from those partners like Nutanix, like VMware, you know, like Dell EMC. Yeah, so Rick, I really liked your line there that most customers, you know, many customers end up hybrid by accident. And unfortunately, I think that's where we are. When, you know, you go talk to them, they might not understand hybrid cloud, multi-cloud. There's like, oh, that's vendor terminology, but do you have SaaS? Oh, absolutely. They've all got 0365 at Salesforce and a whole host of other ones, three which probably IPO today.  They definitely are, you know, most of them at least understand they're using it as opposed to five years ago, it was like, oh wait, we actually checked all the IPs and we had three groups that we didn't realize that were doing the old stealth IT. So what is the advice, you know, how do we make sure we get everybody talking and, you know, what are some steps to move forward on that strategy to actually have a coherent cloud offering, not just the pieces that I put together because that's what different groups did. Sure, yeah, I mean, I think the hybrid by accident scenario is one that we're seeing more and more often from our customers and also just, you know, from other folks in the industry. And I guess just to kind of expound on that a little bit, what we're talking about there is when somebody that we're working with, perhaps goes into a project, goes into a cycle with the notion that they're gonna be all of one or all of the other, right? I'm gonna put everything in the cloud and, or I'm going to put nothing in the cloud. And what happens is you find a workload that doesn't fit whatever your direction is, right? And so all of a sudden, you know, if you're one of those people who say, oh, the cloud is just somebody else's computer, next thing you know you're on O365, next thing you know you're consuming Dropbox or who knows what, you've got all of these different public services and you have no integration between your on-prem environment and all these public services you're leveraging. And so you find yourself in a scenario where you're in a hybrid by accident and which means that you didn't build in the sort of management that would be able to consider these different silos of information, right? And so what we kind of advocate is that when you're approaching these strategic decisions, recognize upfront that you may very well end up in a hybrid scenario, at least in the next, you know, few years, this is probably what it's gonna look like, at least that's what I think. Recognize that upfront and build that into your plan. If you plan to end up in a hybrid end state, your whole environment is gonna be so much more cohesive, you're gonna have that app mobility, you're gonna have so much more flexibility than if you end up there by accident by moving half your workloads out, lift and shift and some things over here. Some stuff gets left behind, different groups are managing different things because they're different skill sets. You know, if you plan to be in that state at the end, you're gonna be in much better shape but you're also gonna be well positioned to continue to move things out as those services become more robust and as you can extract more value from those for your business, right? Yeah, I think if you look at the history of IT, it's very rare that we get one thing to rule them all. Right. It's like, well, Ethernet's done a good job at networking and the mainframe had its time there but at the end of the day, five years from now, it might just be all my solutions are cloud but it's just, as you said, that location matters a little bit less because, by the way, it's not just public and private, that edge computing thing is a huge draw that most companies I talk to have some kind of IoT incentive strategy that they're picking out. How can users be data-driven to get to the right things in the right place and really make smart decisions? Yeah, so I think that there's two facets here to being able to make data-driven decisions. The first is that you have to collect the data. We have to put in the diligence. So certainly, that's one of the places that we're able to help our customers in collecting that information and in quantifying it, attaching dollars and cents. Here's what the services will cost. Here's what the professional services, the replatforming will cost. Let's wrap some numbers around this. If you're trying to make those decisions, if you're creating a strategy and you haven't taken a look at what your costs are gonna be, what the level of effort is gonna be, that's a super incomplete strategy and it's one of the frustrating things for me as a customer-facing resource to walk into one of those situations where a customer is dead set on their strategy but really doesn't understand it themselves. And so we really welcome the opportunity to help those kind of customers do their diligence to be able to create more informed and data-driven strategies, leveraging information from their own environments. All right, Rick, last thing is we know things are changing all the time. What's the last thing you want people to know about Winslow Technology 2019 that they might not have understood if they looked at the company a year or three years ago? Yeah, so I think that some of the big changes that have really come to us in the last couple years is we're adding technical firepower at an alarming rate. So our growth is really focused on the services delivery and the engineering talent. We've brought in high-end security resources, high-end VMware resources. We're able to deliver those cloud connectivity capabilities from all those different products that you mentioned. We're able to deliver a fairly robust security portfolio today, not to mention the highest level of VMware expertise that there is out there. So put a lot of focus into the services, into professional services, into helping our customers sort of understand and make that journey straddle that public private hybrid multi sort of thing. And we think that services is going to drive a lot of this for us going forward. And so our capabilities are growing leaps and bounds year over year in the services and engineering talent perspective. All right, well, Rick Gallin, CTO of Winslow Technology. Always a pleasure to catch up. My prediction, next year I think we'll be another five to 10% closer in our agreement as to what the future looks like. Just because it will be today as opposed to tomorrow in the viewpoint. So be back with much more here from WTG 2019. I'm Stu Miniman and thanks for watching theCUBE.


Two recently released studies prompted me to revisit the topic of gender relations or actually the absence of relations between genders in the post-modern world that we are unlucky enough to inhabit in this dystopia Genders don't speak to each other. They didn't only drift apart, but they have become hostile, adversarial, foes, sometimes deadly enemies. And I'm going to review these two studies. I'm going to dedicate a video each to these two studies, but right now I'm just going to review them and then I'm going to read to you sections or reiterate sections from an interview that I granted a few years ago and has since been taken offline. It's not available online. Don't ask. Okay, let's start with the first study and the first study is the authors are Olyf, Kelly, Gao and others. It is titled Neotraditionalist, the Gallitarian and Progressive Musculinities in Men's Heterosexual Intimate Partner Relations. It was published in Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 333 this year. And here is the abstract. Shifts in gender roles, say the authors. Shifts in identities and relations since the 1980s are continuing to influence masculinities within intimate partner relationships. Forefront in men's contemporary heterosexual relationships have been calls for gender equality and gender equity as a means to promoting the mental health and well-being of partners and their families. Most previous research has focused on a pathologized role of men in relationships. For example, intimate partner violence. Little is known about how men perceive intimate partner relationships using a strength based perspective. The current photo voice study addressed the research question. What are the connections between masculinities and men's heterosexual intimate partner relationships? So the authors studied men between the ages of 19 and 43. They asked them about their experiences, their perspectives about intimate partner relationships. The authors continue to say, we abductively derived three masculine typologies. One, the neo-traditionalist male. Two, the egalitarian men. Three, the progressive one. 24% of participants embodied neo-traditionalist masculinities characterized by reliance on traditional masculine norms that assign domesticities as feminine and prize masculine breadwinner and protector roles. That's 24%. Half of the participants purposefully distanced themselves from traditional masculine norms to engage egalitarian masculinities. These men idealized equal contributions and reciprocity were in counts often used to evaluate each partner's relative efforts and contributions to the relationship. It's a kind of accounting approach to relationships. Progressive masculinities were evident in 26% of participants who focused on fairness and social justice, checking their own privilege to justify, to justly operate within their relationship and more broadly in society. This is study number one and I will analyze it in depth in a future video. Study number two was published in September by the venerable Pew Center. It's a research institute and think tank. According to this recent study, among heterosexuals, 63% of men, two thirds of men and 34% of women, one third of women under age 30, self-describe as permanently single. Things are not much different in the LGBTQ plus communities. 62% of males and 37% of females respectively are self designated single. One fifth, 20% of Generation Z identify as queer. The situation is similar in countries such as China, India, Japan, South Korea and even the United Kingdom and Russia. Only 21% of men and 41% of women talked to a friend in the previous week according to another study in 2021. So a picture of total isolation from opposite sex, potential partners and from one's own social circle. Pew Center research discovered that 57% of singles in all age groups avoid even casual dating. In other words, avoid sex. This is an increase of 20% since 2019, driven largely by disaffected single men. Men are giving up on women. Even so, men are 50% more likely than women to be looking for a committed relationship. Shockingly, women do not want a committed relationship. Men do. Women are into casual sex. More than men actually, breaking the stereotype. There are six trends. So this is the this is a Pew Center study and again I'll dedicate a whole video to analyzing it in the future. Now, back to my work. An interview I gave a few years ago, no longer available online. In that interview, I suggested that there are six trends that brought us where we are. A raging war between increasingly more wary, belligerent and hostile men and women. There is animosity between the genders. A conflict that sometimes devolves into hatred. It's really bad out there. And it's bad in all age groups, which I think is a first in human history, I suggested. The growing intergender problem is a kind of virus. And so it affects all age groups. You can find women aged 65 and 45 and 25, saying exactly the same thing about men and vice versa. Misogyny is rife among men and misery among women. There are six reasons to this deterioration in civility between the sexes. The first reason I call invulnerability signaling. It's a phrase I coined. I think the two genders are signaling to each other. I don't need you. I'm self-sufficient. See if I care. I'm autonomous. I have my goals and I'm focused on them. I don't have emotions. I'm uninvolved. I'm not vulnerable. So while in the past, until let's say 40 years ago, people were signaling to each other their vulnerabilities. In order, for example, to have sex or to date, people are now signaling to each other their invulnerability. It's a kind of f of message or signal. And this has become an ossified ideology. It's cooler to be vulnerable. It's the right thing to do. The second trend is what Barbara Risman described as gender vertigo. Gender vertigo is the outcome of having dispense with classical traditional gender roles, men, women. These gender roles haven't been modified.   No one knows what to do. Everyone is lost. No one knows how to be a man.  So today you don't know what it means to be a man, for example, when dating or having sex.  They're not dating scripts. They're not gender roles. There are no guidelines and this yields enormous confusion regarding what is appropriate and what is inappropriate behavior and what is a code of conduct to be adopted and emulated or modelled. Today every relationship has to be negotiated from scratch. My mother, my father, my grandmother, my grandfather, when they had met and when they were on the way to becoming a couple, when they were in the process, they were guided by codes, by gender roles, society-wide codes. They didn't need to embark on a thousand mile march. They just needed to traverse the last mile to home. Today if you start a new relationship, you have no guidelines. You have to negotiate everything. What it is to be a man in this relationship? What does it mean to be a woman in this relationship? What is acceptable behavior? What constitutes infidelity? What are the boundaries, etc., etc.? 90% of the time we spend on negotiations. Everything has to be negotiated from scratch in every single relationship and this is extremely time consuming, wasteful and destructive. It creates friction. It's exhausting. And so this onerous process leads inevitably to avoidance, withdrawal and schizoid atomization. People just give up on relationships. People are tired. They don't want to do this anymore. They stay at home. Netflix and cats. Not necessarily in this order. 2016 was the first year that a majority of women and a majority of men in the United States did not have a single meaningful contact with a member of the opposite sex, with the exception perhaps of pizza delivered. Now the next trend is what is called the Stold Revolution. The Stold Revolution means that women describe themselves increasingly more by using traditional masculine adjectives and terms. Seven out of eight self-descriptive words used by women are traditional masculine adjectives. Unigender is a single masculine gender. Femininity has been effectively abolished. There are men with penises and men with vaginas, period. We are all masculine. Women have become breadwinners. Women have surpassed men in a variety of areas, far more educated for example. Women have become men. Women aspire to be men or more precisely narcissistic and psychopathic men.  And the politically correct media, the mainstream media adore this uniformity, embellish it, promote it. Consider the moronic phrase pregnant people, the CNN and the New York Times no longer use the phrase pregnant women. It's now pregnant people. It's like saying people with testicles, not men. You know, we are all people in the new world. We're not men. We're not women. We're just people. Some of us mysteriously get pregnant. That's it. Eliminating this beautiful difference, this wonder, this charm between the genders, the source, the engine of attraction of sex, sexuality, fecundity, fertility, procreation, and recreation. Eliminating, eliminating this polarity between men and women made us so much poorer. We are utterly impoverished nowadays when it comes to the relations, what's left of them between men and women. Gradually the very concept of sex is equally being erased via the concept of sex fluidity. Let me make something clear. Transgender and transsexual people do have, do possess innate experiences of not belonging to their biological sex. That is an indisputable fact. It's known as gender dysphoria. There's no reason for these people to not act on this innate feeling and change their sex in order to conform to how they feel. But gender fluidity and sex fluidity as ideologies, as identity politics, these have nothing to do with gender dysphoria. Negating one's biological sex or social and cultural gender as patriarchal, evil, malevolent, a construct, this is intended, something that is intended to enslave the other sex. Because men are saying this about women as well. Women are saying that men were out to enslave them in the patriarchy. Men are now retorting that they have been the slaves all along. But all this is propaganda, not evidence-based science and should not lead to policy making.  All this is, this is, this is not science. It's the ideological crust above all these changes that renders us stultified and nullified and creates all these conflicts and mayhem. The next trend is what I call defined agency. There's a big brouhaha about being agentic, re-acquiring agency and self-efficacy. And of course, agency and self-efficacy are healthy. They shouldn't be pursued. There are markers of mental health, but the contemporary variants have been imbued with aggression. They're euphemisms. They're not real. People are transitioning from assertiveness to violence, to reckless defiance, to contumatiousness, to in-your-face aggression. So now people are this, people display their agency or their self-efficacy, they're displaying it by trampling on other people, by acting recklessly, by being violent and aggressive, by becoming abusive. There's always been a healthy tension between men and women. I mean, that's been the source of attraction between them. There's always been a discourse between genders. And it's true that women were really mistreated, to some extent, enslaved. But in the last 150 years, it's no longer true. All intergender discourses have ultimately proven to be essentially benign and constructive during this period. Had the discourse been malevolent and malignant, women would not have been where they are today, more liberated and emancipated. Men gave them this power. Men gave up on this power. So it seems that men had participated in the discourse in good faith, at least judging by the outcomes. We are not there yet. Equity is still to be obtained and obtained in a variety of areas, but we have come a long way, a very long way. The intergender dialogue has been useful. Instead, now we are corrupting it. We are contaminating it. We are rendering it malignant because we're making this discourse defiant, hostile, aggressive, instead of agentic. The last trend is what I call the enshrined double standard. Now, there's always been a double standard. Of course, women who behaved in a certain way sexually were castigated as sluts. Men who behaved exactly the same way were exalted as studs. It was good writing for men. It was very bad for women's reputation. So that's a double standard. But what happened is an amazing thing. Women have adopted the male double standard. Women are trying to conform to chauvinistic male stereotypes of sexually emancipated women. Nowadays, there's slut pride parades. I don't know why. Women don't realize that to be a slut is to conform to the most extreme misogynistic male stereotype of women.   Women claim to be empowered, but there are multiple studies, for example, by Lisa Wade, by Kerry Cohen, by many others, that demonstrate that the women who claim to be empowered are the most actually suppressed.  For example, these kind of women, the most promiscuous and slottish, they told the researchers, I've had 40 sexual partners, but don't tell anyone because it is shameful. So these women are emancipated, they're empowered, but they do it stealthily, secretly, surreptitiously. Why? Because men and other women will think badly of them. And had anyone known about their body count, they would be ostracized. So these women have actually adopted the male double standard. And this duality, this self-denial, this self-deception, they are driving the genders apart because women are conforming to stereotypes held by narcissistic, chauvinistic, misogynistic men. The majority of men find this very off-putting because most men are not chauvinistic, not psychopathic, not narcissistic. Most men are good men. These typical men are beginning to find women disgusting, repulsive, off-putting. The same way they find narcissistic, psychopathic men repellent. Good men, good men, detest psychopathic narcissistic men. And when women begin to resemble these psychopathic narcissistic men, they push away good men. They become repulsive to good men. So there is a break, a schism between the genders, because women are acting in the part that actually the vast majority of men don't want them to act. And men are acting in the part that now women are rejecting because it doesn't sit well with the alpha male, narcissistic, chauvinistic, psychopathic kind of guy, the bad guy. And so women, men give up. Men give up on education, men give up on finding a job, men give up on commitment or investment, men who are more into dark triad personalities, men who are psychopathic, men who are narcissistic, just take advantage of women's promiscuity and accessibility and abuse them in a variety of ways. They become predators. Women are rejecting themselves. Women have internalized and interjected the double standard, the male double standard. When you say I'm a slut, supposedly it's a proud self-designation, but actually deep inside you feel shame.  This inundisonance creates self-harming and self-trashing behaviors. The incidence of sexual self-trashing and other forms of self-harming among women is much, much higher than today, than it has been 40 or 20 or 30 or even 20 years ago. For example, the incidence of depression among teenage women under the age of 25 is up by 300%. Anxiety disorders among teenage women have skyrocketed by more than 550% according to studies, especially studies by Twenge and Campbell conducted between 2008 and 2018. And all this started long before COVID. COVID may have served as a minor catalyst. The influence of social media and the exposure to screens have been postulated as possible etiologies. But I believe that the fact that women feel bad with having internalized male chauvinistic, psychopathic narcissistic stereotypes of themselves, this has driven them to self-punishment and self-rejection and self-destruction and self-defeat. Women feel ego-distanic. They feel ashamed of themselves. They feel guilty. They act this way. They betray themselves. They deny themselves because they're expected to act this way because they're empowered. And who told them that? Who told them that? Men, essentially, initially. Men. It's the male gaze that has always defined them, now is defining them as promiscuous.  Women feel bad. They feel that they are not themselves. They feel that they are acting. It's a role-play. I consider it a form of self-harming and self-trashing, self-punishment for not being you, for succumbing, for giving in, for falsifying and betraying yourself if you're a woman. Not all women are Madonna's and not all women are whores, but we can safely generalize statistically speaking about the behavior especially of younger women.  A true feminist would encourage them to not adopt the gaze of the psychopathic narcissistic male, the predators who are having a field day with female promiscuity. As to men, why would men choose to be monogamous? Monogamy is a cost. Why would you pay anything for something you can get free? For free. It's not nice to say, but throughout the ages, women have been trading sex for stability, for longevity of relationships and for child rearing. Sex was the coinage of the intergender coinage. That was the deal. It was transactional. And now women are giving this for free. It's totally self-destructive and they're calling itself empowerment. Anything that is commodified is devalued. Women feel pressured into engaging in sex acts, which in the past used to be reserved only for intimate partners. Women and men have always maintained a kind of inventory. These acts I'm doing with strangers and these acts I reserve only for my intimate partners. I never kiss with a stranger, for example. There are some things I never do with strangers and I do them only with my intimate partner, so that my intimate partner could feel special. And now this is gone as well. The specialness is gone. The mystery. It's very sad. It's a disenchanted world. Weber called it the great disenchantment. It's especially sad for people my age because I've had witnessed and experienced the world before. Now women would say it was a patriarchal world. It was a men's world. Yeah, the logic said that's true. And these vestiges of masculine dominance should have been dispensed with. But we threw the baby with the bathwater, with the bathroom, and with the entire apartment, I'm afraid. The assumptions of the intergender dialogue have changed. Everything is kept on the surface. Real intimacy is shunned. And this harks back to the first trend. Remember, invulnerability signaling.  And you don't want them to realize your vulnerabilities because then they can and will hurt you. They're going to hurt you for sure. They're going to take advantage of it. It's a given. So you're not going to let them in. And there are new trends which are very bothersome, very worrying. For example, as of a few years ago, the majority of women have renounced me psychologically in the sense that women are now actually looking for what the manosphere called better males. The majority of women in studies since 2018 report that they are actually selecting what the manosphere calls better males as partners, even for one-night stands. This is because women have adopted narcissistic and psychopathic male role models. And so now they want to feel superior, even in a brief interaction. They want to feel in control. Recent studies show that there has been a shift in preferences for the first time in human history from alpha, empathic, team-building, successful winners to better losers. Now men on the manosphere, of course, are denying this, but they're simply not updated. They rely on nonsensical, non-studies. Many women now have careers. Many women now are self-sufficient economically. They actually seek better males that they can kind of tame, domesticate, and subjugate at home. They want to lord over men, even bully them. And yes, many women are men-haters. There's a kind of payback, retaliatory state of mind involved, because men have wronged women for millennia. Men have abused women for so long. Now it's women's turn. I reiterate, women have adopted narcissistic and psychopathic male role models, rather than good, healthy, constructive male role models. I'm not sure why women have adopted male role models to start with, but they definitely chose the wrong ones. Same-sex relationships and sexuality are going to become more common. Why would a man go for a poor imitation of masculinity if he can absence the original? And the same applies to women. Why would you go for an effeminate sort of masculine of a man? Just head straight for a woman. At the same time, there's going to be a lot more atomization. We are already seeing this, for example, the frequency of sex and dating among people younger than 35, and especially among people younger than 25, is much lower than in their parents' generations and their grandparents' generation. People under the age of 25 date far less and have far fewer sex partners than in previous generations. Dating has declined within 10 years by 60%, 6-0. Even hookups are on the decline. So, people have cynically given up on each other. They gravitate into same-sex relationships or into experimental kinky sex or into celibacy. We have a search, for example, in swinging, the lifestyle, in open relationships, open marriages, about 3% of diets self-identify as being in open relationships and open marriages. 3% sounds like a small number, but it's an enormous leap from the 1950s. Ultimately, we will end up being ensconced and cocooned in our abodes. We will interact digitally and we will find sex substitutes. The consumption of pornography is through the roof five times higher than only five years ago. There's a book called A Billion Wicked Thoughts which documents this phenomenon. Pornography by now is definitely the main substitute for 3D sex as far as men are concerned and the main source for sexual education among the young. Men consider pornography to be a full-fledged substitute to the real thing. Women are not there yet, although they are gravitating towards pornography, textual pornography, but also visual.  They're next. People just give up on any viable alternative they settle for whatever they can get, arrangements like friends with benefits. Lisa Wade in her studies describes conversations with young girls between the ages of 15 and 30. These young women said to her, the worst thing you could do is show emotions. You should never cling, you should never catch emotions, you should never ever write to your sex partner after the first six, the first one night stand.  They say that it's a common practice for men to send them SMSs, text messages, saying don't call me again, don't contact me again. It was a one-time thing. They say that there's a code of behavior where both sides intentionally get drunk so that they can blame the drink and say there was nothing there. It was not emotional. It was not even sexual. We were just drunk. So drinking alcohol has become a kind of alibi or excuse, and this is not a subculture. It encompasses, according to Lisa Wade, 81% of young women, 81. Now Lisa Wade is a prominent scholar, one of a few. She says that about four-fifths of young women adhere to this code, which is code of rejection, a code of alienation, a code of cold detachment, a code of cynicism, a code of what I call signaling invulnerability. I don't need you. I used you, and now I don't need you anymore. I'm self-sufficient. I'm all I need. I'm not interested in you. I have no emotions. I'm not even sexually attracted to you.  I didn't know what I was doing. Don't ever call me. Don't dare to write to me.  This is the intergender dialogue among the young nowadays. Most of it. Another phenomenon is self-phonography. Growing numbers of people, mainly women, but also men, generate pornography, and they just give it away. They put it out there. They turn on live cans, and often not for money. Self-phonography is a transient substitute for any kind of connection, a momentary for intimacy via self-objectification. Sex ting with strangers is driven by the same psychological motivations and needs as canning. So today a woman who refuses to masturbate on camera, she needs help. Something's wrong with her. She's a prude who is denying her own sexuality. This improvement, empowerment thing, is all male dictated. It's all male-oriented. It's male self-interest. It's ironical. It's crazy. It's mind-blowing. It's a male's wonderland. And women comply and collaborate and collude, as they've always done. Women are converting themselves into a commodity, objectifying themselves. And then they are giving themselves freely to men who demand it because they have stereotypes of promiscuous women.


So far we've looked at a lot of numbers, but we've seen all of them from a mathematical perspective. This meant that we had all the symbols we could possibly want. We can have pluses, minuses, we can have arithmetic symbols, we can have a symbol to specify which base we're in, but in a computer we don't have that luxury. All we have are zeros and ones to represent anything we want. So to represent a number, we'll have to find a way to encode that number using just zeros and ones. Sine and magnitude is the simplest way of doing this because all we're going to do is take our regular number in binary, use one bit for the sine, and the remaining bits to hold how you have the number that we've got. So if I've got a 32-bit number, I will use my first bit to represent whether it's a positive or a negative number. And then use the other 31 bits to encode that value. It's a really simple and straightforward way. It's easy to read to see what this number is, but it turns out the arithmetic is hard. So we don't actually use this format in hardware for integer numbers anymore, but we will see something like it again when we get to looking at floating point numbers.


दो स्वंग अगеждеश मूइ की शंगी वोगी जबत मैं औं से लत्ताई ख़ा कर स्वाओय ऱम பस, पर वो भर्द हो कंजन इन मड़ी शूगक कर म glorious आश्स ठ्ची च्टिन ऎ Bier  нрав  наход                                                                                in the rural areas, in both the valleys, Varag valley and Brahmavati valley we have seen a lot of outmigration. So these are definitely going to play a role in the election also. Number 3 important is the contentious this CAB that means Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019. So Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019 will be a very big issue because you see most of the political parties including the political parties who are now with BJP in the election they were opposing the Citizenship Amendment Bill and there was a big movement and the government was forced not to place the CAB in the parliament because of the massive movement in Assam and other parts of the Northeast. So CAB is continuous to hunt the mindset of the people of the Northeast and Assam so it will also be a big issue for the election. So far it's not anti-incumbency factors are there. Definitely. Anti-incumbency plus CAB. But CAB issue hasn't been resolved already it has ended without. No no no because after the bill was stalled in the Rajyosabha I mean it was not placed in the Rajyosabha as there was a big movement in the Northeast after the election was announced, Amit Shah came to Assam and he openly declared that if they are related they will again place the Citizenship Amendment Bill in the parliament. So it is not at all a dead issue it has record in Assam and many people who have seen those who voted for BJP last time that they are going to vote against BJP and they will vote for anyone to defeat BJP in this election just for one issue that is the Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019. But the Panchayat election results they show quite a different picture in the rural Assam or core Assam is pure Assam is belt which is upper Assam. BJP backed most of the about 13, 12 JPC constituencies and most of them fall into the core Assamist areas. After the Panchayat election there was a big change in the political situation in Assam. After the Panchayat election the CAB was placed in the parliament. So there was a big uproar you know in Aparasam even the BJP office were attacked by some I mean agreed people throughout the state there was a big movement and almost every organization bearing BJP and the RSS every organization came to the streets. So after the Panchayat election there is a big political change in the rural areas of Assam also. Before the Panchayat election that movement was confined mainly to the urban areas but after the Panchayat election you know the bill was actually placed after it was placed in the parliament there was a qualitative change in the situation. So I think that in rural areas also there is a big impact of the CAB 2019.


The Tiger, Financial News Network, update. Good morning, folks. Steve Rhodes coming to you live from the shores of sunny Delray Beach, Florida. This year, 9 AM update. Now we got a little bit of a mixed bag out there with regard to US equity futures. You've got the S&Ps up 2 and 1.5 points. NASDAQ's up 18, 110th percent. The Dow was basically flat off five points. Russell's flat up 80 pennies out there. The Sponvoltenics is up 31 cents. If we take a look at what took place over in Asia last night, it was a mixed bag there. You had the Heng saying up 323 points, nearly 2%. 14 points for the Shanghai, about 1.5%. And 1.5% moved to the downside inside the Nikkei of 197. Over in Europe, markets are trading a bit lower. The FTSE down 19, the DAX is off 35 points. You've got gold and silver trading lower this morning. Gold's down 14 bucks. Silver's off 39 cents. And you've got Lights Recruit trading up a buck 92. The US dollar index is off 34 cents. Let's look at that nine panel. Market Update chart. We'll see new profile forming inside the ESMini. Your support area out here between 44.85 and 45.03. Resistance up at 45.41. There is no top, just really consolidation right now with inside profile level. Sponvoltenics still below its 50 day. Exponents moving average. That is a bullish signal for the S&P 500. New profile attempting to form inside the NQ. Support between 15.712 and 15.796. Resistance up at the 15.965 level. US dollar index is an A to B equal C to the downside. It's next price projection target 103.04. A bullish reversal candle would confirm a buy the D pointer and Gartley buy pattern. We took a look at the Euro, the end of the pound during the Trader's Ed show. That looks like to us that they want to continue to strengthen the US dollar index and therefore would weaken. Gold just a consolidation with inside of profile levels between 1943.20 and 1989. Silver forming a new profile. This suggests that we should expect to anticipate a consolidation market for metals out there. Support is down to 2215 to 2238. Resistance up at 2399. Lights being crude, which has an A to B equal CD pattern to the downside. Price is testing its resistance zone. Level to watch today is going to be the top of that bearish structured profile, 7823. You close above that, you're headed higher. Natural gas has got an A to B equal CD pattern to the downside. A bullish reversal candle would confirm a buy the D point pattern. Short of that, 277 becomes its price range in a 30 year treasury, attempting to form a new bearish structured daily profile. The resistance zone is 11420 to 11524 in support down at 11224. Folks, day two for Tommy O'Brien. He's up next. Have a magnificent Monday. I look forward to seeing you again soon. Thanks for joining us.