Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I think I saw something in the time. Crystal, are we ready to go? Okay, okay, everyone, I would like to call the meeting of March 28th, 2024 Planning Commission to order and if we could please call the roll. Thank you, Chair Weeks. Commissioner Carter. Here. Commissioner Cisco. Here. Commissioner Sanders. Here. Commissioner Peterson. Here. Commissioner Holton. Here. Vice Chair Dugan. Here. Chair Weeks. Here. Let the record reflect that all of our commissioners are present. Great, thank you. And before we start, I did want to mention that we will be reordering the agenda and moving item 9.2 before 9.1 and we will be taking action on that at that time, but it is due to the fact that that item is being continued until the April 11th, 2024 meeting. So with that, we have the minutes from February 22nd. Any changes, corrections? Okay, so with that, they will be approved. Do we have any public comments on the minutes? Seeing no one going towards the agenda, I mean, seeing no one going towards the podium, we don't have any public comments, so they will stand as approved. With that, we'll be going to the public comment on non-agenda matters. This is a time when you can address the commission on matters, not on the agenda today. If you choose to do so, please go to one of the podiums and state your name for the record if you so choose. Seeing no one going towards the podium, I'll go ahead and close the public comment period. And going into commission business, our statement of purpose, the Planning Commission is charged with carrying out the California Planning and Zoning Laws in the city of Santa Rosa. Duties include implementing of plans, ordinances, and policies relating to land use matters, assisting in writing and implementing the general plan and area plan, holding public hearings and acting on proposed changes to the zoning code, zoning map, general plan, tentative subdivision maps, and undertaking special planning studies as needed. With that, we'll move on to Item 4.2, Commissioner Reports. A few of us were fortunate enough to go down to Long Beach a couple of weeks ago to the League of California City's Planning Commission Conference. And just to note, next year, that conference will be here in Santa Rosa, so hopefully a lot more of us can attend. So with that, any comments, Commissioner Sanders? Yeah, I did attend the League of Cities Planning Commissioner Conference, and it was really good. Being a new commissioner, I always look forward to it, because I'm always learning something new with one of the sessions being how an idea, how a project goes from an idea through the planning process to a shovel in the ground, really enlightening, you know?  Also, I attended this morning a Waterways Advisory Committee meeting where we talked about a couple of items that are actually going to be coming back to us on April 11th. But the Santa Rosa Transportation and Public Works Department, they're conducting an update of the 2018 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. It's going to be renamed the Active Transportation Plan, and that move is to, you know, because, you know, we don't all active transportation is not just walking and bicycling. I mean, there are people in wheelchairs, and I would assume, you know, many other ways of actively getting themselves from point A to point B. So we talked a little bit about that today, and then also FEMA is updating the water flood maps for the Santa Rosa Creek watershed. And, you know, those changes will be on the website, the city website. I think it's srcity.org for slash floodmaps.com. And you can get to that information and see if you're actually in the Santa Rosa Creek area, because it may have an impact on insurance rates and all that kind of stuff. So it's something to keep track of. Thank you. Any other comments from any commissioners? I do have a couple of other things. One is that on Tuesday, the council heard the appeal to the cell phone tower on Colgan Avenue, and they supported Planning Commission's action and denied the appeal. And I think that's all for me. So we'll go ahead and move on to the vice chair election. So this is the time when we, every year, we appoint vice chair. And so Commissioner Duggan's been the vice chair for the past year. Does anybody, would anybody like to make a motion to nominate a vice chair? Commissioner Sisko. Yes, I'd like to nominate current vice chair, Duggan, to continue as vice chair. And do you accept? Yes, I do. Thank you. Thank you. Is there a second? Second. Okay, so that was moved by Commissioner Sisko and seconded by Commissioner Sanders. Can we have a vote? Commissioner Carter. Aye. Commissioner Sisko. Aye. Commissioner Sanders. Aye. Commissioner Peterson. Aye. Commissioner Holton. Aye. Vice Chair Duggan. Aye. Chair Weeks. Aye. So that passes with seven ayes. And I realized I didn't call for the public comment period on commissioner reports or on this item. So if anybody has any public comments on either the commissioner reports item or the vice chair election, go to one of the podiums. Seeing no one headed that way, I'll go ahead and close those. Excuse me. And we'll move on to item 4.4, which is, I'm sorry, item 5, which is the department report. Yes, thank you. Chair Weeks, members of the commission, Jessica Jones, Deputy Director of Planning. First, congratulations to Vice Chair Duggan for your reappointment. And just following on what Chair Weeks had mentioned at the City Council meeting at this last week, we did have the Verizon item, which, as mentioned, the commission, excuse me, the council did uphold the commission's decision and deny the appeal. At that meeting, we also had the wayfinding sign ordinance item, which the commission heard a while back. And that was approved by the council unanimously. So we will be moving forward with that ordinance. We'll have a second reading at the next council meeting. And it will be effective a month later. And then finally, Commissioner Holton has, unfortunately, submitted a letter of resignation from the commission. We are very sad to see you go. We have been extremely appreciative of your time and your work here on the commission. But we're excited for your new adventures. With that, I did want to mention we will be recruiting to fill that position and as you all know, the Planning Commission is an extremely important part of our city process. So it's very important for us to have a full commission. And we've got a lot of really challenging and exciting items coming before you in this next year. So we are looking to get a new commissioner here as soon as we can. So I did want to mention for anybody who's watching or here in the chambers that we are accepting applications now for Planning Commission. And if anybody is interested in that, they can go to the city's website, which is srcity.org. You click on government and then boards, commissions and committees. And then apply online for a board or commission. And if anybody has any questions about that process, they can reach out to me or anyone on city staff and we can help them get there. And that's all I have. Thank you. So with that, I'll go ahead and open the public comment period on staff report, on department report. Is there anybody wanting to make comment on that? Go to the podium, seeing no one. I will go ahead and close that. So we'll go ahead and move to statement of abstentions. Are there any abstentions? And we have no consent items and no report items. And as I mentioned at the beginning of the meeting, we are rescheduling the, I'm sorry, we are re-numbering the agenda. And item 9.2 is now 9.1, as staff has requested a continuance of this item to a date certain, which is April 11th, 2024. Do you have anything you'd like to say about that? Yes, staff had requested this to be continued in order to just provide some more documentation for essentially applicants, better preparation for the April 11th meeting. So, great. Thank you. And if I could, just so anybody who's watching for clarity, the item that we're talking about 9.2 is public hearing for conditionally used permit for a new telecommunication tower at 2715 Giffen Avenue. Thank you. So to continue it, do we need to make a motion and act on it? Thank you, yes. If you could please ask for a motion to continue to date certain a second and then take a vote, that would be great. Okay, thank you. Would somebody like to make a motion? Yes, I'll make the motion to continue the item to a date certain. Right, and I'll second. Who was the second? Thank you. Can I just clarify that that was to date certain of April 11th, 2024? Sorry, yes, for date certain, what she said. Thank you. So, and we do have one speaker card, which after we take the vote, we'll go ahead and have that speaker. So if we could go ahead, is that okay, Ms. Crocker, to do it in that order? Or do you want to do the speaker now? I would go ahead and ask for, you can ask for a public comment now and then we could take the vote on the continuance. Okay, so we do have one speaker card, Jennifer LaPorte. If you'd like to go to one of the podiums and state your name for the record, that would be great. And you will have three minutes. Three minutes, wow. Okay, my name is Jennifer LaPorta. Can you hear me? I'm an environmental health scientist with 25 years of employment and a degree in environmental health. So I object to this macro tower. It conflicts with your own zoning ordinance because your zoning ordinance says you cannot have, you need two miles in between macro towers. And the nearest macro tower is 1.1 mile away, which is, they moved our item up, Cindy, which is on Hampton Road. I'll give you the address. It's 1594 Hampton Road. I found this on AntennaSearch.com and it's listed to Hoosier Towers LLC. The other reason to object to this tower, it is 1,400 feet to the Rosalind Creek. And only 400 feet to the nearest residence on Campbell Drive. And the corner of Lombardi Lane. So what we have here, I understand you don't make policy in this chamber, but you need to know the background here that we're talking about 40 small cells and 25 macro towers already in Santa Rosa. And it is a looming public health crisis. Each one of these towers are public health nuisances. And look up Reipen, R-I-P-O-N, California, and see what happened there with the cell phone tower. Where there was a cancer cluster, it was built out of school. On the school grounds, there was a cancer cluster. And they turned that tower off, I'm not sure if they actually took it down. But that happened there, and then look up SB 649. California passed SB 649 in 2017. I already emailed you guys, I don't know if you read the emails. But this was to protect firefighters, okay? Because they found that firefighters were suffering neurological symptoms. Headache, insomnia, brain fog, getting lost in the same town that they grew up in. Sometimes for getting protocol in routine medical procedures, mood swings, infertility, etc.  On firefighters in California who had lived in the shadow of a tower for over five years, the study conducted by Gunnar Hoyser, MD, PhD. Okay, if we care enough about firefighters' health, what about the rest of us? We don't consent to beginning pigs in this massive health experiment on our health and lives. Thank you very much, I see my time is up. Thank you, and as I mentioned, this item is being continued after a vote until April 11th, 2024, and you will have a chance to speak on the item at that time. But if you do wish to make a comment now, please make your way to one of the podiums and state your name for the record. But as I said, you will also have time on April 11th to make comments. So if you'd like to speak, please state your name for the record. Hi, my name is Sydney Cox, and boy, did I have trouble putting coins in the meter. Anyway, hi. It's nice to be back here. I just wanted to mention, I made copies of the postcard that was sent to the Colgan Avenue people. I know this is not about that. But the postcard, there was complaints about the font being really little, and I measured it, and it's six point font. So my suggestion would be sending out these postcards to the neighbors would be good, maybe in an envelope and also in Spanish. I made copies for everybody, you might not have seen this, so I've got a copy for everyone just to see how small the font was. That was a big complaint because people couldn't read the font, unless you have a magnifying glass. So that's the first thing, I have one for everybody. And then the second thing is, I just want to say that I did send you an email, which is probably too late, you probably didn't get it. But I wanted to share some studies with you, because I think the last time we were here some of you didn't know about the studies. I found a really good, easy website that has a number of studies, and they're just mentioned with links where you can click on the links. And I just also want to say that it's really hard to care about this issue, unless you've had a family member or yourself affected by it. And I didn't expect this to be what I'm doing in my golden years. I would much rather be doing something else, but for some reason the universe has brought me to this place. And you know, it's because I had family member affected, my son. He developed inflammation on the right side of his face. This was about 10 years ago, and it was really sad because he was about to go to law school, and I was really scared. And it was inflammation as I was swollen, and his temple was swollen, and they wanted to do a CT scan, but he said that was too much radiation for his poor 25-year-old body. And I'm not a religious person, but I prayed and prayed. And luckily he's okay today, but I worry about him every day. And then I had a really dear friend who died of a glioblastoma to her brain. And at that point I had to meter one of those radio frequency meters, and I was very annoying everyone because I would take it with me, and I would take readings, and I would show people, look what your microwave does, look what your phone does. Anyway, but you know, my friend up in Reading, she lived in a mobile home that was metal, and when you have something that's metal, it acts like a Faraday cage. So whatever kind of frequency that comes off of her phone, she had cordless phones and her cell phone, it bounces around. So she had a... So anyway, I just wanted to share those things. That's how I came to where I am now, and thank you for your time. Thank you. And if anybody else want to speak on this item, which as I mentioned, we will be continuing until April 11th, 2024. If so, please make your way to the podium at this time. Hi, my name is Kim Kelly. I live in the Giffen Avenue area. My questions are probably the same everybody else has. The effects... First of all, who does this help? Who does it hurt? The effects on our health, depending on how close you live to it. The effects on our property value, if you have one close to you. I just want to hear all the pros and cons about that, and I guess mainly the health issues are my biggest concern. Thank you. I was hoping to hear information for you today. So, I'm sorry. I was hoping to get information. I have those questions hopefully answered today or in the future and some of the documentation you'll be sending us. If you have questions, please go ahead and email them to the staff if you haven't already. Okay. Well, I just want to say that I do have a lot of questions and I will be keeping an eye on it closely, because I do live very close to this new tower. I'm not opposed to the way it looks. I'm opposed to the functions and the effects of it. Thank you for your time. Thank you. So with that, I see no one else going towards the podium. For this comment, we'll go ahead and close the public comment on this item and bring it back to the commission. That item to continue, item 9.2 to April 11th, was moved by Commissioner Sanders and seconded by Commissioner Holton. So with that, if we could have the vote, please. Commissioner Carter. Aye. Commissioner Siskel. Aye. Commissioner Sanders. Aye. Commissioner Peterson. Aye. Commissioner Holton. Aye. Vice Chair Dugan. Aye. Chair Weeks. Aye. So that passes with seven ayes and the item will be continued, as I've said, to April 11th, 2024. So with that, we'll go back to our first item on the agenda, 9.1. It is a public hearing Oakmont Village Association Plan Development Text Amendment to modify the language of the existing policy statements, REZ 23-002. This is not an ex parte item. So we'll go ahead and I think planner Walski, if you would like to go ahead and start. Yes, just a moment while I get my screen share ready. Yeah, I think we can all see it now. We're good. OK, good afternoon, Chair and Planning Commission members. My name is Sheila Walski. I'm with the Planning and Economic Development Division. The agenda item before you today is the REZ zone application to amend plan development PD 63001. Plan development, also known as PD zoning, has been approved throughout the city in various locations and subdivisions. Zoning code section 20-26.060f allows plan developments to be amended with a REZ zone application. This particular REZ zone application seeks to maintain the PD zoning designation and amend the plan development policy statement and maps. Plan development zoning can allow for distinct land use permitting and development standards through the plan development policy statement. The impetus for this particular application is that this policy statement requires a city use permit application for all new uses, including accessory uses. A use permit application can be both an expensive and lengthy process and particularly onerous for uses which are compatible with the parcel's general plan land use designation, in which would otherwise be permitted by right. The applicants are requesting this amendment to reduce financial and regulatory barriers for compatible uses. This slide depicts the boundaries of plan development PD 63001, which is highlighted in yellow. All properties are located in the Oakmont senior living community. And this PD includes most but not all of Oakmont. This slide is the project history. To note, the January 26 meeting at Oakmont's Berger Center was well attended. There were approximately 100 Oakmont residents in attendance. Based on comments received and a showing of hands, it appeared that the vast majority of attendees were in support of the proposed amendments and no one spoke in opposition. These next two slides outline the proposed amendments to the plan development. This first slide deals with amendments to the policy statement. First, the bulk of Oakmont, for the bulk of Oakmont, land use permitting and development standards would default to a property's implementing zoning district based on the property's general planned land use designation. The majority of properties in Oakmont have a general planned land use designation of low or very low density residential. This amendment would allow planning staff to review applications based on the zoning code's residential land use permitting table. In practice, this could mean that a home-based business that meets the city's zoning code requirements for a home occupation, for instance, a web-based business operating from home, could be allowed without the need for a use permit application. For the commercial properties located in this PD, staff would also be able to review new uses in the context of the city's zoning code commercial land use and permitting table. This amendment could allow for the transition of business uses from a bank to pharmacy to medical office to restaurant uses without the need for a use permit application. As further examples, a large grocery store would continue to require a conditional use permit, and a cannabis manufacturing facility would not be permitted, all consistent with the city's zoning code. The second amendment deals with the types of uses that would be allowed by right on parcels with a general planned land use designation of parks and recreation. This section of the amended policy statement defines the types of outdoor recreational uses that would be allowed by right to include sport courts, community gardens, and dog parks. The purpose of this is to allow compatible outdoor recreation activities on properties designated parks and recreation without the requirement of a use permit. These uses are defined because the implementing zoning district, which is open space recreational, or OSR, is actually fairly limiting for recreation uses. And this is most likely because most parks and recreation designated parcels are government owned and not subject to use permit requirements. All other outdoor recreation uses are, excuse me, all these outdoor recreation uses are consistent with the general plan policies and goals for parks and recreation designated parcels. For these parks and recreation designated parcels, most development standards would default to the implementing zoning district standards. Some of which include maximum height and lock coverage. The proposed policy statement defines 15 foot front, side, and rear setbacks. And we're being specifically prescriptive about the setbacks because the OSR zoning district requires setbacks be established by use permit. The policy statement calls out that outdoor lighting is not permitted unless it is reviewed and approved through the city's applicable permitting process. And the fourth bullet point for these parks and recreation land use parcels is that by right outdoor recreational uses shall not exceed 10,000 square feet except where conversion is proposed on existing development of the same footprint. The amended policy statement also provides a note that design review is required for all new structures and exterior modifications to existing structures where required by the city's zoning code. This slide covers the map amendments that are proposed to the plan development. The image at the top is the existing boundary map from 1963. As you can see it's outdated and doesn't reflect the build out of Oakmont. The proposed boundary map bottom left in blue exhibit A provides more clarity including parcel lines as well as depicting the areas of Oakmont that are excluded from this particular PD zoning district. Please note there are no other changes proposed to the existing boundary. The map depicted lower right exhibit B reflects the parcels with the general planned land use designation of parks and recreation. For the general plan analysis the majority of properties in this plan development have a general planned land use designation of low density or very low density residential. This plan development also includes parcels with general planned land use designations of parks and recreation, retail medium density residential, retail and business services, public institutional and office. This amendment would not change the general planned land use designations of any property. This slide lists some of the general plan goals and policies that are implemented by this proposed amendment and these primarily address recreational goals and policies as well as economic vitality and economic development goals and policies achieved with these amendments. In particular I'd like to highlight PSFA and PSFA one which deal with the goals of providing recreational facilities for all sectors of the community including specific age groups. Based on a review of the above goals and policies it is staff's position that the proposed rezoning to amend this plan development is consistent with the general plan goals and policies. Additionally the amendments would provide a more streamlined path for development of parks and recreation facilities on parcels designated parks and recreation consistent with the general plan. The zoning code implements the general plan and as such amending the policy statement to create a document that provides a framework to evaluate uses based on the general plan creates this policy statement that is more consistent with the general plan. In terms of zoning code amendment findings the city zoning code provides direction on amending plan developments in zoning code chapter 20-64 one of which is to hear the matter before the planning commission and council as a public hearing item. Further there are certain findings that must be made and which are listed on this slide. For the first finding the proposed amendments would provide for compatible outdoor recreational land uses on parcels with a general plan land use designation of parks and recreation without the requirement of a use permit application. This implements general plan goals PSFA one and PSFA and PSFA 17 which encouraged the provision of recreational facilities. The amendments also support general plan goals LULJ, EVA and EVB seven which encourage a positive and vital business community and business attraction. For commercial and office zone parcels in this plan development the amendments would remove the requirement for use permit application for new compatible uses attracting new commercial and office land uses. Further the amendments would rely on the city zoning code to establish land use permitting requirements for parcels consistent with the general plan land use designation. Future development projects in this plan development would continue to be subject to public interest, health, safety, convenience and welfare findings consistent with the zoning code and general plan land use designation. Two for the CEQA finding we'll review this one on the following slide it has its own dedicated slide and for the third finding the project is internally consistent with the other applicable provisions of the zoning code in that the project creates a plan development policy statement that is more internally consistent with the city's zoning code for development standards and permitting requirements. For the outdoor recreational uses the proposed uses are consistent with the city's general plan. The project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA section 21083 and CEQA guidelines sections 15183 provide that if a proposed development project is consistent with the general plan and an environmental impact report was certified with respect to that general plan environmental review shall be limited to the effects on the environment which are peculiar to the parcel or to the project in which we're not addressed as significant effects in the prior environmental impact report or which substantial new information shows will be more significant than described in the prior environmental impact report. The proposed project has been found to be consistent with the Santa Rosa General Plan. Review of the project has revealed no significant environmental impacts which are peculiar to the parcel or to the project in which we're not addressed in the general plan EIR nor is there any new information that shows that any environmental impacts will be more significant than as described in that EIR. Any future developments subject to discretionary entitlement will require CEQA compliance. In anticipation of any facilities being constructed in the future they would likely be exempt under the CEQA guidelines section exemptions listed below on this slide. It is recommended by the planning and economic development department that the planning commission by resolution recommend that the city council adopt text amendments to the plan development policy statement for the Oakmont plan development PD 63001 to include updated maps, default to the city zoning code for land use permitting requirements consistent with the associated general plan land use designation, establish uses and setbacks compatible with the parks and recreation general planned land use designation. And if the planning commission chooses to recommend to the council these amendments this afternoon this item will be heard by the council at a future public hearing. Here is my contact information and I am available for any questions and the applicants are in the audience as well if there are any questions. Thank you. Thank you. Does the applicant have a presentation to make or just available for questions? They don't have a presentation. Great. So before I go ahead and open the public hearing on this are there any questions of staff? I have one. If you could go back to slide or page five, number three, we have note that design review shall apply to new structures and exterior modifications to existing structures. What types of, what would be required by the zoning code? See, which slide? Oh, I'm sorry, slide five. Oh, number three. And I'm sorry, I should have asked you that earlier. That's okay. It's really dependent on the level of improvements. The zoning code has a table of when design review is applied. Essentially single family dwellings are exempt. So something that's on a parks and recreation parcel if it's very minor, it could potentially be over the counter. If it's something that's, do you recall, Susie, that up to 10,000 square feet would be zoning administrator level and over that we're talking about design review board. Thank you. And is it not scheduled yet for the council depending upon our action today? That is correct. Thank you. So with that, any questions? Okay, I'll go ahead and open the public hearing on this. We do have some cards, but you don't need to have filled out a card. So if you are in the chamber and wish to make a comment, please make your way to the podium. You'll have three minutes for comment and a countdown timer will alert you. We have cards from Larry Burns, Richard Hirsch and Margaret Newman. My name's Margaret Newman. I'm a resident of Oakmont Village. And I just like to say I support the proposed update to the plan development document. Thank you. Larry Burns. I just wanted to support the recommendation that has been made. That's it. Thank you. And Richard Hirsch. I also want to support the recommendations that have been made. Thank you. And if you could state your name for the record, if you choose to do so. Yes, my name is Iris Harrell and I'm on the Oakmont Village Association Board along with Jeff Newman, setting the audience. And we worked on this together. I wanted to thank the planning department for helping on technical questions. And we are really just wanting to bring Oakmont into the 21st century. It was developed in 1963. And there are planners here who are 30 years old, have never been to Oakmont and we'd like the maps to be accurate. Thank you. Any other comments on this item from the public? Okay, seeing nobody else, I'll go ahead and close the public hearing on this item and bring it back to the commission. Any other questions? Okay, so with that, if somebody could make a motion on this. I can do it. Thank you, Chair, or Commissioner Siscoe. Resolution of the planning, I move a resolution of the planning commission of the city of Santa Rosa, recommending to the city council, adoption of a text amendment to the Oakmont plan development, PD 63-001 policy statement, including modifications to one, updated maps to default to the city's zoning code for land use permitting requirements, consistent with the general plan land use designation and three, establish compatible uses with the parks and recreation land use designation, file number REZ 23-002 and way further reading of the text. I'll second. Thank you. So that, so we'll go ahead and do some, do comments and we'll start with Commissioner Holton. This one's pretty straightforward and I agree with most of the folks in attendance here. It's time to get into the new millennium and allow you folks to go ahead and take care of a lot of business that could be expedited and not waste a lot of public resources time. So thank you very much. I appreciate it. Have a great day. Commissioner Siscoe. Yeah, this is a very efficient method to update the planned PD as opposed to eliminating it and rezoning all the parcels to get them consistent with the zoning code. So like the approach, I think it's completely appropriate to go ahead and do this for the reason stated and also really want to compliment planner Wolski. What a great presentation, very clear and very thorough. So very good job. And I can make all of the findings. Mr. Duggan. I too can make all the required findings and I think this is a wonderful use of the city's staff time because I'm old enough to remember when pickleball needed a use permit. And I think that that was not at the time. I remember we were all kind of confused like why are we talking about this here? So I think this is fine and I can make all the required findings and support. Thank you. Mr. Peterson. I think my fellow commissioners have ably commented on this so I can make all the required findings and I'm in favor of the project. Thank you. Commissioner Carter. Yeah, I too have nothing further to add other than to say good job everybody and let's get on with it. Thank you and commissioner. I can make the required findings. Thank you. Commissioner Sanders. I also can make the required findings and I like that you said that we're under 30. I like that. Which one? But yes, I'll be supporting. Thank you. Thank you. And I also can make all the required findings and I think this is very efficient and I do echo commissioner Cisco. Ms. Walski did a really good clear job. Thank you. So with that, it was moved by commissioner Cisco, seconded by vice chair Duggan. We could go ahead and get a vote. Thank you, chair weeks. Commissioner Carter. I. Commissioner Cisco. I. Commissioner Sanders. I. Commissioner Peterson. I. Commissioner Holton. I can also make all the required findings and I thank you. Thank you. Vice chair Duggan. I. Chair Weeks. I. So that passes with seven eyes and please note that this action is final unless an appeal is filed with the city clerk's office within 10 calendar days of today's decision pursuant to zoning code section 20-62.030 and unless there's anything else from staff for today, we'll go ahead and adjourn the meeting until our next regularly scheduled meeting in April. Thank you.


Moving right along, now I'm going to switch over to the Maps app and the first thing that we're going to look at is the new facility layer. So I am going to open the Maps app. Yep, I'm going to leave that without saving. Thanks for reminding me. And if I go to add layer, you'll see that the new, we have a new addition. It's the facilities layer. So I'm going to click on the facility layer. And in this layer, we're going to be able to disaggregate or indicate our various facilities by different organizational unit groups or group sets. So let's first turn on the country, and then let's go down to our facility level. Turn those on. And here we see our various groups. Let's look at just the clinics. And then we're going to go over to the style tab. And this is where we can organize them by group sets. So I am now going to turn on the group set. Let's just look at facility ownership. And I'm going to add this layer. And here you see all of the various facilities in Sierra Leone. And their indication, their icon indicates the facility ownership. We look at the key up here. We see that we have Mission, NGO, Private Clinic, and Public Facilities. You see that the vast majority of them are public facilities. But if we zoom in to this area here, we'll change this to OSM detail. Make it a little bit more interesting to look at. If I zoom in, then you see that I actually have some facilities that are, this one here is a Private Clinic. And there are some others in another Private Clinic. But anyways, you're just essentially able to then disaggregate or visualize your map. So the facilities based upon various groups that you put them into. All right. A pretty simple feature, but it really does help get a clear idea of the various facilities, types that you have in your country, especially for that master facility list use case that we're trying to work towards.


What's up everybody? Welcome to the weekly recap. My name is Liz Jackson and I am joined by Denya, the gracious host Eyyy, Gracie Gracie, aso usiari bute na jeena Wacha kwa kia mambo mingi, wacha tu So guys, we are back again with interesting topics. Thank you so much for engaging with us last Friday. So today is Friday and we are back on needs to talk to you about the trending topics. On to the first one. Samuruna cheka. Kasipul has admitted to cheating on his wife. Failia! Fail! And the wife takes care of his six children and additional two that they have together. Shehe. Shehe mani no gani shehe. And then Alisema he regrets cheating on his wife with the wrong person. So is there a right person to cheat with? Nani shehe. Kasipul admitted to cheating. Yes. See maybe he apologised to the wife and the wife was like I forgive you so he was letting it out. I don't think he was letting it out. I am going to apologize to his family. Women! Women. What do you think about dating someone who has six children? Niwa ke? Awa sita? I think awa sita niwa because he says she takes care of my six children and these are the two that they have with her. So that woman takes care of eight kids. Yeah. And then you get cheated on with the wrong person. So he made it to the right. Eight children! So eight seem biased aren't they? One is up to eight. Pa pa pa pa pa pa eight. We are not okay happy. My lord are you wonder? Are you wonder? Eight. No I feel like but you know people are different. There are people who love children when they don't mind taking of children. But now my issue with Kasipul is where would you go and talk about your mistakes in public? I don't know what to say. I don't know what to say. I don't know what to say. I don't know what to say. I don't know what to say. So I feel like I don't get why he had to do that and then he regrets cheating with the wrong person. Meaning there's a right person to cheat with. I don't know what to say. We love the doctor Kasipul who has been taking care of eight children. Shea miangusha. Miangusha team. Failia. Failia. Anyway me afa kwa eight children dikona shida na Shida kwa eight children kwa chitina the wrong person? No, no, no. Everything is a little bit you know but like you cheat on me and I take care of your eight children. Eight. Like namka subuna wa tarisha kila mtu socks. Eh, bryo socks. Eh, sok socks. Nani me putresa, nani jefanya homoak. Oh, wey, mpa kwa kuna register jwa. Totoni weyengi.  I don't know how to talk about that. No, unless, unless the woman wajokuna kuna kuna the women who will be like so many apologies here. But you see you cannot disrespect me in public and apologies in private. So he apologizes in public. So, yeah, the women who are like okay, the same disrespect you gave me in public ni kombenta mahi. This is a monuna. So this is very sad, Shehe. Shehe, a memama kwa. Yes, Shehe, tena zandani. Shehe, zandani Shehe. But anyway, I hope what you saw to Mamboiao there's no relationship that's perfect. I do not advocate for cheating, cheating. Ooh, I do not forgive cheating. I wish I said no. But Eh, you can, you forgive cheating. I can, but of course it was the same again. But I can't forgive. I don't think things would be the same again. Yeah. Yeah. Ewe mungus tuwa chasis peke tuwa tu ma skinatu nangufu. Hehe. Tena kwa zandani. Tena zandani. Tena zisha li shtuwa mimi. Tena zisha li shtuwa mimi. Onto the other topic there is a man who apparently he dresses like a woman. Reason being he was instructed by God. Ele si kukatanu kwa numu and this is a father of four kids. A father of four kids. He has a wife and he dresses as a woman. Had he braids palia na piga braids mazada. Ana shuka deniwale. Ana shuka deniwale. Kwa ni? Ui umungu tena Ui umungu silebi manake. Ui usi angaleshwana mungu. Aga kwa ambia. Zandani shaka. I feel like God speaks to people differently. True. Ui nanyu habisha and through itukaiso. Lakin ni umunguana kwa mbe ube. The only problem I have with this issue is when someone purports that God has spoken to them we can't verify. Yeah. But maybe it's true. God akamambia Meseja neza kwa mbe pata lakin ni di kama kwelewa yu message. True. I don't get it. I imagine bakuana kuja visiting kama medunga rinda.  So confusing. So confusing. Hey, I'm ever a rinda. No, I'm a rinda in this era. Nakamisia pink. Pa. Kiaweeja. Kia nasa kivi kiawit. Hey. I'm God alone. But I'm God alone. Mani umungu atu ngilili. Majotua atu ngilili. Asa satena kama God in the AMEM show. But these days mambu ya kani say kwa weird. Mili. Mili. Mili. Mili. Mili. Wali. mili. Wali. K ma nakotha naka nasan Echingaha peyle kwa uzi. What's... I mean, I don't know... I just feel like the easiest thing to make money with is selling hope. Uxyowase hope. I m nump조. vielleicht director you'll be a millionaire. Kuluna kana, komanda kifan w bizi kisha wotu accessory school church. Komanda tena me funguwas à jib So often I'm chasing someone and I want to stab my feet for the world... Kofi, kamaanda tana atagi wa doa wa skizi instrakshons Nipuwa kuwana yo kadisa Nipuwa kuwana pasim strict Nini ya pasiwa kuwana strict utwa fuwetaneno Do you know that? Commander Kamaanda na commander kwa 72, he's turning 72 Ya, he's 72 Hey, that's a fine man My lord, are you wonder? He's a young man, is that what you're trying to say? Kwa 72 na kwa? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na? Kwa na kwa kwa mungu Lakin ni su seme kwa na zasi yana kwa vizuri Kwa 72 Ya, he looks young You're trying to twist my word, yana kwa vizuri Ntika tu elewane Manakia kwa kwa video kaki kato ebi kese me kana Nde niya ni sema kwa commander is a fine man Wotanile tia mi kosi kwa commander nitu kanae bure Yes, tu na agri He does not look Me, he looks like he's 50, early 50 Zata, see late 50s Neki nma kwa kwa commander mi siya mini badu yai 72 Una jo ali kwa gelat From 72 a kachili wa 92 For 20 years he was in and out of prison No wonder ni mele o basi Ya, tana gelat Manze tana gelapale yai mulu a kuna Wagi No wonder ni kwa gelat Nini mani chunguza wewe Nini mani chunguza wewe He onto the next story So there is a 22-year-old girl Who has been mascarading as a GSU officer Nali weza kushi kwa jana Akapele kwa kutini So mi mi, una jo daki tuili Shangasa ni yati Genzi wa kuna gats Yani una wezi kwa trafik ofisa Wezi kwa AP Una kwa GSU Tena una piga pitcha kwa police station Ya, na bunduki Exactly, mi I think she should be trained Same, kwa confidence That's confidence Ya ni mutu anatafta uniform Anatafta bunduki Kwa station Anapiga pitcha Ya ni nyota So the judge that is handling her case But that's a very She's very confident but Pia ni zati kwa kwa kwa conversation Uli ona vilali, she kwa vilali kwa na tembea Na braids a blue wewe Tamombia ni ni Genzi Laki ni apu alijuza kwa braids a blue Kuna kwa kuna braids a blue Angenyua braids Yama na lim seti Yaka shi yukwa Anyway, but I feel it's Very whiskey But please, as huda Huda piali seima jana Please just train the girl One, two Edo ni alakasi bebe E, alikwa probably May be amekwanan doto yaku Fika kwa amika anatafta opportunity So please Train the girl Nimi janja muna Kwa poli station tana na bunduki Na una post Na una post Anyway, girl Chase your dreams Manzia chilenu yao dem please Sasa Onto the other story There is a video that has been trending Ya Peter Salasya Mi Mambo ya siya lewe Peter Salasya aparentali Alislab a lokal Elikwa a lokal mca lemi ritor Ya, it was an mca Ya na peyana tu Nini wuko speech ririta na kofi Kambi mca kachini mca Anasema aparentali Wami kwa kimu attack fawaya Nani, wami kwa kia attack Salasya Ya, wami mca in people like that Pasa sa, kitwiksiku elewa Okia paoneza kwanakabif Lekini tina kuna video ingine Direct at Shaftya to eke apu Salasya na sangele siya utura Salasya me to kambi Susa kino guna shanga Amma, probabili you know he was at a burial And definitely what one is amhanda do So alikwa na tafta awe Udi wana yo video Sini ele, nila kwa mika, mika, mika Salasya tina, ame vanish Ame vanish adekazi Imagine kwa security tu asalasya We took a shoot up another time Kupia adiminues pmbaz Achezi na kazi Ate running for unknown reasons Tena na suchi Aali job and view Salasya alaf tena He was arranged in court for slapping the mca Aka kwa mgunja mi admiti waha mika iwi Aka kwa mgunja mi admiti waha mika iwi I love this Letu na nimona video Aki address the public He is not sorry He is not sorry for his actions Ni tizi za uko western Lakin ni Ni kama embaramba Ah Salasya waka nasili mi Similari tizi kuse waka weli But embaramba wana jo anavanga dimini Skatati mungu ame mune ni Tia na wewe tia na mungu ame mune bia Tia na zungu kwa nizi Nini Awa wili wakona Kuna tutabia tuko Ama kuna kitua naona tu ni Na tini wiki pindi Na jote na nana zako akwa biz Betwana zaparawando akwa normal Ah, shehe When we think about it Eh, probably It's good to keep the country entertained Nini It's good to keep the country entertained Eh, lakin ni msi tu stressan To pelike Onto the other one Yungu ni amuishokwanza e So this is the third one This is a nine year old Mune, apparently The dada limuwa Aka mga rakata And then a kapatia the pieces to the mama Kambia mpike basia mkul What is going on? Juzi mungi na apiko gali kaka meg Kitua shu Aka katu kitu Eh, 2025 janza po Manzena tkodete 19 Tkodete 19 Na the death cases we've had It is very sad Kulete na kabete Wali dunga Exo ake na chali ake Imagine emotional immaturity Atuja pumuakwa rita waeni Ata skaleta tatatu jahil Manze it is so sad Uunon ni ni nendele I think the men need to Re-evaluate some Not all How they handle themselves When they are upset Kudziya kwenyo ofisi Meme umizwa Kwa mimi umiza Mimi mimi kudziya Mimi mmschana barubaro Kijana barubari Akinia kwa mimi mmschana barubaro Ei binti kizi Mimi mitukakuwagu Mifikapale kwa packing Mimebeba my notebook Mimi shkakuwa gari Gari nibufanya Na tembi atu na tembi atu na skia Mi yukiniambia sasa Dr. Limaika Mama mama yuwebu But What do you mean So mi nika I was like I have just stepped out of my car I am wearing like this And when you were like You sing Rich girl Liz Jackson You cannot not reach girl I am of course walao banduki nafi banduki wai wai nika skia kuenda uko utenda kuchinjoko ea bnb na jifanya apa imajin imajin maka I was like ok nika sema wajatu nende le jumachu zili kwa kaributu initoke I was like how insensitive can you be sijakufa niya anything that is very wrong sijakufa niya anything sijaku ignore ene numeni katkulu na nita ksksksks alafusim tu moja there were like 2 men so sijakufa I was like should I record these guys or not but I was like you know umesomezi comments are these men who are killing women comment section the way they are bleeding and the memes going around and memes people are making fun from air bnb to nende walao aschan wa road trips zaburi imajin aki people unu jichu nga ngelele lives that have been lost families are bleeding what was a hill it is just very insensitive to come out and at a comment kaya umtu comeback umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtu kaya umtuku related to one of the of the incident imagine sa sayngi kwa usiko vile ningeo gopa mi ataka fiyanguni for if I kupatikana injuni ni because it so scary like I am supposed to feel safe when I'm walking to the office you you're there calling me telling me vile ntende aku chinjua really to make me your paper your paper is she in doing and I feel like people need to pray sayi people need to pray and when you pray ask God to give you the spirit of discernment kusindo on to our last story so jana content creator ordinary Diana Marwa is the first female in Kenya to reach one million subscribers congrats congrats to our one million I feel like as much as this drama or as much as people you know talk about her hawak ethic she's very consistent and she's very hardworking and I feel like she deserves that one million in Etua what gold button she deserves it she puts in the work she does content content content content she's very authentic and that's an inspiration to us and all other creators who make about that exactly no dad says that's what happens with most of creators Most of the people see, as in social media, as I said before, they think our life is just smooth. They don't need to make lags on video. They work behind the scenes. Here, we are shooting. So, people think to be shot, when people say, no matter how much you say it, you attract people, for sure. So, you will put yourself there to attract men. ni ni job kama any other job eno una excuse mae rifa kutuka kehi tumema liza tumema liza lho any other topic akuna topic ni mini meka siri kabadu si jar na muna itajera muni treat, maua produce nibi iya to maua ni ni cool me off because ni ni ni muiwe maQueen suungo jabal lentalins Alright guys, that was it from us for the weekly wika We are going to see you guys next week on Friday Until then, make sure Nene, nene, make sure you subscribe to us Subscribe to us I don't know what to say Subscribe to us Subscribe to us


Question is from Andrew Beth, is the term big boned actually a thing or is an excuse for individuals who are overweight? Absolutely, it's a thing. Well, you guys ever see that famous like, it's like an image. It's used as an excuse quite a bit. Yeah, you guys ever see that thing, it's like, it's not an X-ray, but it's got, it's like an image of. Like an MRI. Yeah, of an obese person. Yeah, cells. Next to, it's an obese person, next to an average weight person. And the skeletal structure looks almost identical. Almost identical.  But then, I mean, there is a, if you were to measure, measure. Measure. Measure. Yeah, if you were to measure my wrist and Justin's wrist, and I'm a six foot three guy, so I'm a taller guy, I have a lot more muscle and I'm better looking. Whoa, whoa, guy. You just slipped that in there. Dude, I don't agree with any of this. But yeah. Let's put that to a pole. But yet he has a much bigger wrist, you know. So. All right, all right, you came back. He came back, he gave me something. I've been working on it. I mean, husky. Semantotypes has been debunked, right? Which is the ecto, meso and endomorphism, which is what was in our old textbooks.  But the one thing I don't like about them getting rid of those or debunking the semantotypes is there is some truth to that. There are certain people. There are different body types. Yeah, and there are people that respond very well to building muscle and struggle with losing body fat and the opposite should. Some people respond really, really well, have really fast, healthy metabolisms and burn body fat really quick, but struggle to put on muscle. So I do believe that there, now to Justin's point, I do believe there's a lot of people that use that as an excuse for being overweight. And what I think a lot of those, a lot of the people that fall into that category are the ones that struggle with fat loss. It's not necessarily directly correlated with their big bones. It's just genetically, they have a harder time losing body fat. But what I would always tell those clients that would complain about that is, yeah, but we have an advantage for building muscle. If you're normally the person who struggles with losing weight and you can put on weight really well, if you can put on weight really well, you normally can build muscle better than the person who has the opposite struggle, right? So there's advantages to both sides. But the whole like genetic, you know, I'm overweight because of my genetics. I'm heavy because of my genetics. There's some truth to it, but there's also a lot of false to that. Okay, so if you go back a hundred years, 200 years that you're not gonna see nearly as many obese people as you see today, that's not the result of our genetics changing in that short period of time. Cause over the course of evolution, a hundred years is nothing. What that's a result of is lifestyle. And when you see families that are overweight, it's not their genetics either usually. It's usually because they all eat the same way. It's their family culture. Product of the environment. Right, so if you see an overweight kid, chances are you're gonna have overweight parents. And in the past that we thought, oh, it's because of the genetics of the parents. No, it's their lifestyle. They have a lifestyle that promotes, that kind of obesity. If you can find pictures, you can actually go online and find pictures of circus, they used to call them the circus fat man. So back in the day, circuses used to have this really terrible sideshow act where they would have people with deformities or people who would go- Lady with the beard. Yeah, that kind of stuff and people would pay to stare at these people. And the circus fat man at the late 1800s, was like 300 pounds, right? They would walk through Walmart. Nobody would even bat an eye. But back then, they were so considered so different that people paid money to look at them. And it's really because times have changed. Our lives have changed. Our lifestyle, our calories are available. That's right. So it is often used as an excuse, but there is some truth in the sense that some people have bigger bones than other people. I would say genetically speaking, you're probably, that probably will count for something like 20, 30 pound difference. Not the 50, 60, 100 pound difference that we see today where someone says, it's my genes. Probably, probably not true. But as far as your bone structure is concerned, you can't do much to change that, right? And I think if you want to achieve any type of satisfaction with your life, you're probably better off not focusing on the things you can't change and focusing on the things you can. Well, I liked what you brought up, Adam, in terms of like turning that into a positive. More than likely you're gonna have the propensity to be able to build muscle if you have that as, like it's an issue that you will put on weight easily. Well, let's change what kind of weight that is. So yeah, I think a lot of things like that have another side to it that people aren't really focusing on enough.


What do you do for work? Who me? I'm an AI consultant. Oh no way, that's pretty cool. What's your favorite? Sure, here's an example. I utilize AI to implement strategies. Are you reading from chat GPT right now? Hello? He replaces humans with robots. No, I don't. You're literally replacing your own thoughts with a robot's thoughts like right now. Say an original thought like the, say the first thing on your mind. Cake. Cake? That was my original thought. Let's see your phone, dude. Oh my God. Oh my God.