Things moving in circles power the world around us from the whirring of electric generators to the gentle swing of wind turbine blades in the breeze Things moving in circles can also be a sort of delight to us Think of a ferris wheel moving around at an amusement park Of course Things moving in circles are also a source of incredible beauty and regularity in the cosmos the moon orbiting the earth every 28 days The moon is sort of a cosmic tennis ball tethered to us by some unseen influence Worrying around the earth and we will begin to investigate this kind of motion here from the simplest examples through the mathematics and into the consequences of Circular motion and ceasing circular motion Let's begin to explore the mathematical description of circular motion so that we can come to a deeper understanding of the interplay between Speed and velocity and position time and acceleration The key ideas that we're going to encounter in this section of the course are the following We're going to come to recognize that some motion occurs not along straight lines but rather along circular paths that require at least two dimensions to describe We've already seen some examples of this We will consider this kind of motion when the object in circular motion has a constant speed along the circular path So the object is moving on some kind of circular shape And if you were to ask at any moment what is its speed You would be told its speed is the same as the last time you asked Now as you'll see something is changing And we're going to come to understand that circular motion is a kind of motion where the speed may remain the same At least in uniform circular motion But where the direction of the velocity not its magnitude but its direction is constantly changing And we're going to come to understand the nature of the kind of acceleration that results in this form of motion And its magnitude and its direction and how that relates to the magnitude and direction of the velocity itself Let's begin by thinking about circular motion and how you can make it happen Again we've seen examples of this but let's take a really simple example Take a coin I've depicted a ridiculously large coin in the picture on the right here Put it flat on a nice level even surface Now give it a push What kind of motion does it execute? So let's go ahead and let's do this Go ahead and try that over and over The coin may not exactly go the way you flick your finger Your finger may not be as straight and flicking as you think it is It may veer off to the left, it may veer off to the right It might be going straight ahead the way you thought you were flicking your finger in the first place But when it starts moving it moves along a straight line until the force of friction That is the contact that it makes with the surface you push it on stops it Now consider this Can you make that coin go in a circular path just by pushing on it once? Go ahead and try that over and over again Just push on it once and let it go Does it go in a circle? You should find if your surface is level So gravity doesn't get to play a role in this That you just can't do it And really what you're going to find out by trial and error Is that if you want to make an object go in a circle You're going to have to provide some kind of force or influence That constantly changes the direction of the object's motion Even as it tries to move along a straight line These simple experiments reveal something about the character of motion in the world That objects in motion tend to remain going in the motion Along the direction they were traveling Unless they were acted upon by some other influence That alters that direction or alters the speed of the motion The coin slows down because of friction But its direction of motion is entirely determined By the way you flick it with your finger And then your finger stops making contact And your coin will continue on the path Determined by the angle of the flick and so forth But you just can't make it go in a circle Unless you constantly influence the coin in some way And that's an interesting observation about the natural world Why does the moon continue to circle the earth Even though nothing seems to be touching it These are questions that we will grapple with As we go forward in the course Certainly the 28-day orbit of the moon around the earth Must be accomplished by some influence Some force that keeps the moon Even if it's moving in a constant speed Forever changing its direction So that it remains in a circular path around our own planet So let's begin to think about circular motion And to think about and describe And to come to understand circular motion We really have to combine everything That we've encountered in this course so far In one synthesis exercise This is why this is such an interesting topic It forces you to combine position and time And velocity and acceleration and vectors And even calculus into one synthesis exercise To come to grasp what seems like such a simple thing It's really actually a little bit complicated under the hood But I promise you that you have the toolkit at this point To pick apart the how of what's going on in circular motion So let's consider an object that is moving in circles For instance, a ball tied to a string Swung above your head in a plane That is parallel to the ground above your head I've depicted that in the right hand graph So I've got a coordinate system I've made up It's as if we're looking down on the ball Being spun over your head So we can see the perfect circular path That the ball is making over some period of time Time is not represented here We are merely getting the X coordinate And the Y coordinate in this plane And the blue circular arrow That closes on itself is a depiction Of the direction of motion Which in this case is counterclockwise It's going from the right hemisphere To the left hemisphere and back in this plane And it's centered at three And I'll come back to the point of the center of motion In a little bit Centered at three along the Y axis Centered at zero along X Now let's consider a single point along the motion curve For instance, this might be the ball That's moving in the circular path The ball is effectively only at one place We can think of it as a point And the ball's location and space That point is constantly changing As it moves around the circle So we could freeze the ball at some instant of time And just consider a very tiny Slice of time after that And consider the motion of the ball Along the circular path in that tiny slice What would that small motion reveal? What would the velocity of the ball be doing? So think about that for just a moment If we froze the ball at this moment And then we let just a slice of time A microsecond, a picosecond of time Drift so we could watch the movie of the ball moving Just edge forward slightly What would that tell us about its direction of motion At the moment ago where we froze the motion And what we would learn by thinking about this By playing with this kind of at the experimental level Would be that if we were to draw The velocity vector of the ball in that moment That instantaneous velocity vector It would be an arrow that is Tangent to the circular motion path And I would hope that that would be A bit of a reminder to something that came up earlier When we were talking about motion paths And derivatives, calculus The motion, the velocity vector Is the tangent line to the curve That's what the derivative is The derivative of x with respect to t Tells you the direction of the tangent line At that point x, at that moment t So it tells you how you're going to get To the next point in the curve It's pointing in the sense of motion And that's what I've depicted Over here on the right in the graph So we have the ball represented in red We have the instantaneous velocity vector Whose direction I've indicated With a unit vector v hat I don't have to draw the whole vector And it points tangent to the circle At the point where the ball was When we froze the motion But if we let time lapse forward now Sometime later, the ball has moved It's still moving at the same speed Maybe it was moving at A quarter of a meter per second Or a tenth of a meter per second Something like that, that hasn't changed But something has changed And the something that has changed If we now freeze the ball At the top of this circular path The ball, if we again Let a little bit of time move And think about, okay, where does the ball move Well, it moves not from down to up As it did on the right hand side of the curve But at the top of the curve it moves From right to left, just a little bit And so that gives us a sense of the velocity vector At that point, and it points to the left Indicating that this is the direction The ball is going at that moment It's not pointing up, it's pointing left And we can consider again the ball At a later point, some other time T Down here, for instance And in here, again, the velocity vector Is tangent to the motion path And it would point in the sense That I have drawn it here So while the speed may not be changing The direction of this velocity vector Certainly is, something is changing So let's take stock of what we have observed An object in uniform circular motion Whose speed is not changing Nonetheless, experiences a change in direction There is a change The change, if we go back And take a look at that graph What's the tip of the arrow That represents the velocity vector At any moment doing What is that tip of the arrow doing It's tilting toward the center In each moment of time And it's this tilting toward the center As if something were constantly nudging the vector Hey, move back toward the center Of the circular path That's what keeps it on the circle And this kind of acceleration Is a specific kind of acceleration Given its own name Centripetal acceleration And centripetal simply means center seeking So whatever it is Whatever influence, whatever force Keeps that motion on a circular path It does so in a way that makes the nose Of the velocity vector Seek the center of that circular motion We would like to describe this Because we would like to make concrete predictions About the velocity Its direction, acceleration And how those things relate to each other And we can find the equation That does this, that describes Centripetal acceleration By considering a very tiny moment In the motion of this circular path And an infinitesimal change in that motion Over an equally infinitesimal moment of time You've heard this before This is calculus So we've got it all here We've got space, we've got time We've got speed We've got velocity with the speed Which is the magnitude and the direction So we've got vectors And now we're going to employ the tool kit Of calculus to come to a deeper Mathematical understanding Of what it means to move At a constant speed in a circular path And to do this we have to keep in mind The definition of acceleration And by that of course I mean Instantaneous acceleration Although I do not say that When I say acceleration Instead of average acceleration I always mean instantaneous And the equation for that Vector A is given by The average velocity In some extremely small piece of time Sending the slice of time Over which you calculate the average to zero And this is defined as The first derivative with respect to time Of the velocity vector And you can go ahead and use The full limit formula for this Of course this is the correct way To mathematically calculate a derivative But if you're comfortable at this point With the fact that this beast Can be summarized notationally Seemingly innocent looking Little operator dv dt Then you should feel free to go ahead And look up the first derivative Of anything that we encounter But as you'll see here when we get to the point Of actually assessing what the derivatives are We already have those definitions in our pocket And we don't have to really do any hard work Looking them up Let's get to that So let's go back to our picture here We've got our circular motion That motion path is always going to be Represented by the blue circling arrow That closes on itself We've got the object, the ball It's going to be the point That we're considering the motion at And I've selected this point In the lower left quadrant Of the circular motion The center of the motion is somewhere right about here And notice that this is displaced From the origin of the coordinate system I did this on purpose to move you A little bit outside your comfort zone At this point you can put the circle Of the coordinate system But it turns out it doesn't matter Physics and its assessment Of what's going on in motion As you will come to learn more and more Has aspects that are Absolutely invariant to your choice Of coordinate system origin And things like that It's just that some calculations are easier Under certain circumstances than others But as you'll see here this one's not so bad However, it is a bit of a tour de force Of everything we've seen so far So let's get moving The object, that ball Has a velocity vector associated With it at this moment on the path And it's got components It's got a component that is horizontal So that is that points only along the x axis And we can label that vx vector So here's v vector, the full velocity vector It's tangent to the motion curve It's horizontal component, it's x component Of course always points along the x axis And it's y component which In this case points down The vector is moving to the right And down at this moment Will always point along the y axis And only along the y axis Now as the ball moves through the circle Of course it's x component length And it's y component length are ever changing This is what nudges the nose Of the velocity vector Back toward the center of the circle And keeps the ball on the circular motion path And we can represent this of course Mathematically using the equations For components of vectors we've written before So we have the velocity vector Is equal to its x component Plus its y component And these are each vectors And this is the simplest form we could write any vector in That is two dimensional Now I can further break the components down Into a piece representing their magnitude Although there may be a plus or a minus sign hidden in here And as you'll see in this exercise I've decided to go ahead And let the minus sign kind of leak in Via the vx and vy The unit vector that represents being on the x axis And pointing along that direction Being on the y axis And pointing along that direction So that's it, that's our equation for the velocity This is an equation we could write down For anything that is moving It doesn't tell us very much right now But as you'll see with a little trigonometry It will Now we can also recognize That the location in space Relative to the center of the motion Which is the sort of key stable point In all of this. This point is not moving The ball might be moving But in an ideal situation the center of motion Is fixed in space It has some coordinates I'm going to think of the center of motion As my origin for this problem So relative to that point The center of motion The ball has an x coordinate Which is just a distance along the x axis From the Vertical line that intersects the center To where the ball is So that's labeled here x And it's got a y coordinate And so to get from the center Of the circle To the point on the circle The motion path of the ball I have to go down And I have to go left at this moment In time. If I want to go from the center Of the circle out here So think about this as a displacement Vector that gets me out to the ball I have to go down And I have to go left And just like with any vector system Okay, so here's the radial vector The line that points from the center Of motion to where the ball is On the circular motion path That's the radius of the circle I'm going to call that r And we've just formed a right triangle Which you can do with any vector Any vector has two components If it's a two dimensional vector An x component and a y component And they always form a right triangle Whose hypotenuse is the length Of the original vector So I've got a y component I've got an x component And I've got a hypotenuse represented By the radius of the circle And so it must be that this Beast can be described By the Pythagorean theorem Alright, so let me go back And add some stuff in here Okay, so I've now Put the y component back We're going to need that in a moment As I said, the Pythagorean theorem should give me the relationship At any time between x, y and r But there's some other things lurking inside Of this distance right triangle With r, x and y as its sides There are angles So let me go ahead And label those. I'm going to take the circle away To make this a little bit easier to see Otherwise this picture gets a little bit cluttered Very fast. So We've got one angle that we always have In a right triangle and that is the right angle It's the angle between the y side And the x side But we've got two other angles in a right triangle And we don't necessarily know What their values are We do know some things mathematically about them But we don't know specifically Right now without more information What exactly those angles are So I'm going to label them They're variables. I don't know their values And I'm going to label this angle up here At the apex of the right triangle As the Greek letter theta The lower case letter in the Greek alphabet Theta And then the remaining angle down here on the lower left I'm going to label with the lower case Greek letter phi So we have a 90 degree A right angle here We have theta up here And phi down here We don't know what theta is But we can start relating Theta and phi to other things we do know For instance We know that the sum of all angles Is 180 degrees If you prefer radians That's pi radians I prefer radians But I put degrees down here to give you some measure of comfort In case radians are still a little uncomfortable to you So we know that the sum Of all of these three angles must be 180 degrees Well, what are the angles? Well, one of them is 90 degrees Or pi over 2 radians One of them is theta And one of them is phi So I can already write an equation Theta plus phi must equal 180 That has to be true in any triangle The three interior angles Must add up to 180 degrees And this is awesome Because this allows me then to rewrite this equation And relate phi And theta And if we rewrite this equation in one way We'll find that phi is equal to 90 degrees Minus theta But we can flip that equation around And also solve for theta in terms of phi Theta is 90 minus phi So we've already got two interesting equations out of this And you're going to see why these are useful In a moment Now continuing on with this right triangle picture Again, I've kept the Pythagorean theorem Here to remind you of the right triangle nature Of what's going on here With vector component Composition And I've rewritten these angular relationships Here for you as well Now Remember That since the velocity vector V, down here Is tangent to the circular path That tells us what the angle is Between the radial vector Which points from the center Out to the ball And the velocity vector Which points tangent to the circle At that point That angle must also be 90 degrees The radius of a circle The radial line of a circle Is always 90 degrees To the tangent Of the point on the circle that it intersects So if you imagine extending the radial line Out through a point on the circle Go ahead and emphasize that point with a pen or pencil On your own hand drawn circle Draw a tangent line there That only touches the circle at one point Even if your drawing is not so good Even if that doesn't look like a 90 degree angle Mathematically, geometrically, trigonometrically That angle Is always exactly 90 degrees And this is a very handy piece of information Because we can use this to figure out What the heck the angles are Down here that we would need To decompose our vector v Into its components, v y And v x So with that information in mind That this is 90 degrees Here We can begin to label Other bits of information If the angle between r and v Is 90 degrees And this piece of the 90 degree angle Is taken up by phi Then this remaining piece Can be solved for This piece here Is just 90 degrees minus phi This little angle interior Between the horizontal component Of the radial vector And v itself Is 90 degrees minus phi And Given our relationship up here That 90 degrees minus phi Is theta Let's go ahead and replace this With theta Now note here That because this Is an entirely vertical component V y And this is an entirely horizontal Component x, the distance along the x axis To go from the center of the circle To the point on the circular Motion path This is another 90 degree angle And so again we have a situation Where this whole thing is 90 degrees Theta, so this must be 90 minus theta And we're good We've now labeled The angle between v y and v We've actually Also labeled the angle between v x and v I haven't written v x here, v x is the horizontal Component but it's absolutely Parallel to the x Component of the radial vector And so it makes the same angle theta With respect to v And this is great because now We're going to metric information relating Sides and angles and hypotenuses Within a right triangle Remember your signs and cosines And how those relate the Sides to the hypotenuse Of a right triangle So again you could realize Hey this is phi but it might be more Convenient to keep this as 90 minus theta I did this just to remind you that we could use These relations appear again To do some substitutions So let's put the Motion path back Let's take the radial vector r away Let's take its x component and its y component away Let's put the components Of the velocity vector back on the graph v x and v y And I've left theta and phi here Labeling the angles between What is now as you can see The horizontal component of the velocity V and phi Or 90 minus theta Which is the angle between the vertical Component of the velocity vector Now we know a couple of things We've just learned the angles between the components Of velocity and the full velocity vector Check that off But now we also know a couple of other things Thanks to trigonometry We know that the cosine of phi Which is the length of the adjacent side Over the hypotenuse Is given by v y over v And we know that the cosine of theta Which again is given by the adjacent side Over the hypotenuse Is equal to v x over v And We know one more thing If you go back and review your trigonometric Identities or look them up on Wikipedia Which is what I did You can remind yourself that The cosine of phi Which can be written as the cosine of 90 degrees Minus theta Has an identity to the sine function The cosine of 90 minus any angle Is the sine of that angle So we can write everything up here In terms of theta We don't need phi and theta We can just eliminate phi in terms of theta And have some nice simple trigonometric formulas For v x, v y, v And sines and cosines And here we go We've got that now So employing that identity V y will be related to v in the sine of theta V x will be related to v In the cosine of theta Now this is where I'm going to start sticking Direction information in I know that v y points down We know that it must have a negative sense to it So I'm going to put a minus sign in front of v times sine theta when I solve for v y v x points in the positive x direction So I'm going to leave that as a positive quantity v cosine theta Okay, well this is great But now we've got a new variable to deal with Now we've got theta What the heck's theta doing is a function of time I have no idea And you shouldn't either So let's see if we can eliminate this Let's eliminate theta in terms of Something that we've been dealing with more commonly And those are coordinates x and y Now remember your right triangle If you go back and take a look at the r x y Right triangle That's also got theta And phi in it And that means it's also got Sines and cosines that relate y and x to r And if you take a look at The directional information That to get to From the center of motion of the circle To the point where the ball is on the circular motion path You have to go down and left Or negative y direction Negative x direction You would find that the components of the radial Vector, r vector Would be negative r cosine theta And negative r sine theta Which then allows us to write the following That cosine of theta is negative y over r And sine of theta is negative x over r And bam I can eliminate theta entirely From my v y and v x equations In terms of y, x and r Coordinates That seems a lot nicer So let's do that So now if I do that substitution I have v y equals Two minus signs cancel out Because they multiply each other Positive v y over r And then v x is negative v x over r Here I pick up a net Minus sign in this component Alright so finally In terms of x and y and r And the speed v We can finally write the velocity In terms of all of these things And here's the velocity vector Written in terms of x, y, v and r And as you can see I've got this formula here So I've still got my i hats And my j hats But now I've picked up y's, x's, r's And there's my overall speed v Just sitting there now So remember this is Uniform circular motion So v never changes So to get acceleration from velocity What do we do? We know the speed isn't changing Because this is uniform circular motion So something's changing Let's figure out what it is And to figure that out We have to take the first derivative of velocity With respect to time Okay and so again To remind you That's going to be written in the following way I showed you this a few slides ago And one important thing to understand As we're about to step forward here Is something I haven't really emphasized before And that has to do with the Behavior of the time derivative The behavior of any derivative really Imagine a generic equation That you're going to take the derivative of And it's got some constants in it And I'm going to label those a and b And I'm going to do a time derivative So they are constant in time They do not depend on time If I ask you What is the value of a At zero seconds You might say Well it's five And if I ask you Well great, what's the value of a At ten seconds You'd say it's five Because it's a constant It doesn't change Constants are special When it comes to the time derivative The time derivative Answers the following question How is the thing I am taking the derivative of Changing with time The thing with which I'm taking the derivative A constant the answer is It's not So if you have only a constant The time derivative of that is zero It's not changing And the derivative With respect to time The first derivative with respect to time Answers simply the question How is this thing Changing with time And if you only have a constant And you take the derivative of it The answer is Not at all Zero It's not changing in time If you have a constant Multiplying something That does change in time Well you still have something That's changing in time But that constant isn't And you can move the constant Out of the way of the derivative It's one of the special rules That you will work up to In first semester calculus You'll prove it Or at least you'll show how to derive it I'm just going to use it So I've written that kind of out down here If I have this fancy formula For the derivative The limit is delta t goes to zero Of the function Well the function We have to do the Change in the function Over the change in time And let's say the function now The part of it that actually Does change with time I'm writing as f of t But the constants a and b Which are dividing one another Out in front They're just multiplying f of t And so the rule is That if you have a bunch of constants Doing stuff that multiply The thing that actually changes with time You are free to take those constants And move them out To the left of the derivative operation So that's what I've done over here I've taken a over b A over b is still a constant Because a is a constant b is a constant The ratio doesn't change So I've taken this liberty This little mathematical freedom that I have And I've moved the multiplication Activity of a over b Out in front of the whole derivative So there is no dependence On the order of multiplication Whether you do the multiplication Then the derivative Or do the derivative And then the multiplication When you have constants That are doing the multiplication There is a penalty If the thing That's multiplying another thing Is time dependent If they're both time dependent You have to be careful But a and b are constants As I defined them And it doesn't matter So I've moved a over b Out in front Now I just have the limit Of delta f of t over delta t And this is just the derivative Of f of t with respect to time So this is the final formula You would arrive at here You just move the action Of the multiplication Of these constants in time To later You do the derivative first That's much easier Now you've simplified the function You don't have to worry About these stupid constants anymore And then once you've got Done with the derivative You can multiply by over b So that's just a little Mathematical aside I didn't prove anything You would learn that In first semester calculus But we're going to use it So let's write out the equation That represents the acceleration We're going to see one more thing That happens with time derivatives here One more cool mathematical feature Of time derivatives That you would learn in first semester calculus We're just going to use it here So we're going to take the time derivative Of the velocity vector That we've written down To get the acceleration Acceleration is the first derivative With respect to time Of the velocity vector That's the definition of acceleration Well, we've got to write out v vector So here I've got the derivative operation And it's acting on this thing In big parentheses And that thing is the velocity vector From a couple of slides ago Negative v Y over r I hat Plus v X over r J hat Okay, going one step further How can I simplify this? Well, the derivative Acting on a sum Like this Can be distributed So I can have the derivative Of this first thing Plus the derivative Of this second thing That's another feature Of the derivative Distributed Kind of like multiplying this whole Thing in parentheses By a constant You can distribute the multiplication To each piece of the sum You can distribute The derivative operation To each piece Of course, you still have to Act accordingly And responsibility On each piece with the derivative So I'm going to write it out Just the next step So I can do the derivative Of the first piece Plus the derivative Of the second piece Okay, before we go further With this Before we start trying to pull Constance out of this And then finally figure out What we're taking The actual derivative of Let's answer a question Let's take stock of things What in these big parentheses Is constant in time And what is not Okay, so I want you to think About this Of course, you can kind of already see The answer's here But I just want you to think About this If you let time Step forward A tiny bit from the picture That we've been looking at Will a specific quantity Change Will x change Will y change Will r change Will v change Will i hat change Will j hat change Which of these are constant? Which of them can you confidently say No, I know this thing will not change Or confidently say yes I know that this thing will change Think about that a moment Come up with your own answers And then advance the video Well the constants are The radius of the circle The speed of the object V I hat and j hat Why those four? Well this is uniform circular motion The radius of the circular path Is fixed It never changes So even if the ball Moves along the circumference Of the circular path R hasn't changed So r is constant The speed never changes Because by definition This is uniform circular motion So v never changes either That's the definition of uniform motion The unit vectors I hat and j hat They always point in their assigned directions I hat always points along the x direction J hat points along the y direction They never deviate from that So you might have been tempted to think Ah well I hat and j hat have to change When the ball moves But what's really changing Are its coordinates Not the definition of the unit vectors The unit vectors constantly And always point along their assigned axes X and Y For I hat and j hat respectively So all four of these Do not change in this problem in time But what is variable What varies with time Well certainly If you let the ball move along The circumference of the circular path By letting time slip a bit Its x coordinate is different And its y coordinate is different It is not in the same x and y position It was in a moment ago And you have to update those numbers So those things vary in time And if we're going to have a time dependent piece Of this above equation Y is one of them And x is the other V, R, I hat and j hat do not change So they are our A's and B's From the previous slide V, I hat, j hat and R Those are our constants of time We can pull them out in front Of the derivative operation And multiply them later After we've taken the derivative So let's go ahead and do that I have rewritten my acceleration equation With the constants pulled out in front So I've got negative V over R, I hat Those are all constant Now we've got this time derivative Of y with respect to t And then I've got plus V over R, j hat And now I've got this time derivative of x So now we have to answer The following question Can we go further with this What are these time derivatives What physically Is the time derivative of the x position And what does it mean physically To take the time derivative of the y position Hopefully now with some experience Relating speed, velocity, position, time All this stuff to one another You have a fairly ready notion Of what this would be Why these are the x and y components Of the velocity vector dx dt is the velocity in the x direction And dy dt is the velocity in the y direction And together these components With proper unit vectors and signs Form the full velocity vector v So if we substitute that Into the acceleration equation Now acceleration is equal to Negative V over R, I hat Vy plus V over R, j hat Vx It's interesting to note That because of the way That the trigonometric functions Relate to R, x and y That for the acceleration The y component of the velocity Plays a role in the x component Of acceleration And the x component of velocity Plays a component in the y component Of acceleration Just an interesting observation And that has implications Physically for what happens next So then we can take one step further We've got this v over R That multiplies both terms Let's pull it out in front And group the components together So we've got v over R out in front And then we've got negative Vy, I hat plus Vx, j hat And I'm not a big fan Of having v, y and vx in here Because I don't really know what they are But I'm going to write them back again In terms of these trigonometric relations I'm going to substitute for v, y and vx In terms of the speed v And cosine and sine of theta And the reason I do that Is that I can then pull an additional v That multiplies all of this stuff Inside the parentheses Out in front one more time Okay, well we have arrived Essentially at an answer The question was How do we describe this Intripetal acceleration How do we describe the acceleration That accompanies this velocity Whose direction is constantly Being nudged toward the center of motion Well that was our velocity vector Here we had velocity vector v Is v sine theta, I hat Minus v cosine theta, j hat And this is the acceleration That now accompanies graphically The components I've shown here So the centripetal acceleration Is v over r times the quantity v cosine theta, I hat Plus v sine theta, j hat Notice the sines and cosines have flipped The cosine now goes with the x component Of the acceleration And the sine goes with the y component Of the acceleration Note also that while the velocity For this moment in time Points down and to the right The acceleration vector Which you can write out Points up and to the right Points toward the center of the circle It is truly center seeking The acceleration which is A change of direction But not the magnitude of the velocity Not the speed Is something that points directly At the center of the circular motion path And this explains why it is That this object remains on this path The acceleration vector Is a vector that is at always A right angle to the velocity It makes a 90 degree angle With respect to the velocity At any point on the circle And it dutifully points in Toward the center of the circle Calculus, vectors, position, time, velocity These have all come together To tell us the answer to the question Indeed centripetal acceleration Is truly center seeking Now it's got components of course It's got a horizontal component Which happens to coincide With vx in this case But it's got a vertical component That points exactly in the opposite direction Of vy and that's what flips The direction of the acceleration Toward the center of the motion It's the sum of these two things Here that net Give us the acceleration That points toward the center We've actually got one more thing We can do here Because the components of any vector Form the sides of a right triangle And the hypotenuse of that right triangle Is the length of the vector itself We have centripetal acceleration That's our hypotenuse It must be true that its components Squared and summed Must be equal to the square Of the length of the acceleration vector itself Okay, well let's go ahead and write that out So we've got the x component Which is v over r, v cosine theta And we've got the y component Which is v over r, v sine theta And if I square the x component And I square the y component And I've just written that out here And then I sum those together To get the square of the centripetal acceleration I get this equation And then I go one step further And I pull out like terms And multiply that times the stuff That I still can't simplify Which is cosine squared plus sine squared Think back to your trigonometry This is one of the beautiful identities In trigonometry The cosine squared of an angle Plus the sine squared of an angle Is always equal to one It's one of the nice relationships Between sine and cosine Square the cosine of the angle Square the sine of the angle Atom, you always get one So I can substitute this thing In parentheses with the number one And that leaves me with just v to the fourth over r squared Times one Which is just v to the fourth Over r squared And if I take the square root of this I can get back to the centripetal acceleration And I find out that the magnitude Of the centripetal acceleration Is simply given by the speed squared Over the r The radius of the circular path That's a nice relationship If I know v and I know r I can get a centripetal for free If I know a centripetal and I know r I can figure out the speed for free This is an awesome relationship It allows us to predict so many things About an object that's going In circular motion around some point So let's take stock of everything That we've learned about uniform circular motion An object maintaining a constant speed While moving in a circle of fixed radius Is executing uniform circular motion Now, such objects are accelerating But it's not the magnitude of the velocity That is the speed that's changing Rather, it's the direction of the velocity That is changing So the speed remains constant But the direction changes Over and over and over and over again As some influence nudges the velocity Vector toward the center of motion Center seeking for centripetal acceleration That's how we describe that change And the magnitude of that centripetal acceleration Is given by this deceptively simple Looking equation V squared over r The centripetal acceleration Always points in toward the center of the motion That is the center of the circle The middle of the circle And finally Let's look at one more aspect of this And that is What happens when the influence Maintaining an object in circular motion Stops acting It is important to note That if that happens Whatever force or influence or action That's keeping the object in the circular motion Ceases to act Then at the very moment that the force stops This centripetal acceleration Also stops What does that mean for the motion of the object? Does the object keep whirling in a circle? Well, that's what people thought at one time But if you do the experiment And we're going to do the experiment in a moment That is not what happens In fact, what does happen Observationally in the natural world Is that the object Suddenly freed from its influence That keeps it going in a circle Will simply continue along a path At least initially That's given by whatever its velocity V is at the moment it's released So if you think about, again The whirling ball overhead And you're looking down on it And you're keeping the ball whirling Over your head To a string that's affixed to your palm Of your hand and gripped by your fingers What if you cut the string? Well, if you cut the string at a particular moment Remember the velocity vector Is pointing tangent to the circle It's pointing at a right angle To the string Which is the radius of your circle So when you cut the string The ball should continue Roughly straight along the trajectory It was aimed on Tangent to the circle The degree angle to your string At that moment It will cease circular motion And it will continue on that path Unless acted upon by another force Now when we do this experiment As you'll see in a moment We can have a ball on a string We can arrange a situation Where the string can be cut So that it is no longer able to influence The motion of the ball Unfortunately on the surface of the earth There's always at least one other force acting And that is gravity So yes, the ball's trajectory After that will not be perfectly straight It will fall toward the center of the earth But it will continue In the component that is Parallel to the surface of the earth Along the straight line That it was aimed on At the moment the string was cut So let's contrive this experiment And let's observe the results I have here a tennis ball Which is affixed to a very thin piece of string That could be easily cut by scissors Or some other sharp blade What I'm going to do is I'm going to begin to move the ball Over my head in a circular motion Simply by whirling the ball And tugging on the string a little bit To keep the string pulling the ball back Now I have a razor blade On a stand pointing up into the air Such that when the ball swings Past my right shoulder It can cut the string You can see here it really is a blade Clamped in And it pretty is pretty sharp And I begin by swinging the ball In such a way that the string is above the blade And once I'm confident that I've got this Moving in a pretty good plane Above my head I'm going to begin to slowly lower the string Lower my arm a little bit So that the string swings right through the blade Here we go, we're approaching the moment Watch Now let's take a look at that In slow motion one more time You can see the string is swinging around I've now lowered it The blade is going to make contact with the string And then sure enough it cuts the string And the ball doesn't continue moving in a circle It continues straight Along the velocity vector it had At the moment that the blade Separated the string into two pieces And I can even show you here That the string has in fact been cut Into two pieces by holding The now frayed and damaged end up to the camera So this is an example of Having something that's moving in circular motion Under an influence, in this case a thin piece of string But then suddenly removing the influence And observing what happens to the ball We can do this again with a view from the side Whirling a ball from the side Of course in this case it'll be under the influence Of gravity and projectile motion once it leaves But watch carefully As I'm whirling the tennis ball on the string Watch what happens when I let go of it And we'll try to look at this very slowly So that you can see the direction That the tennis ball is moving on Just as I release And it continues along that direction Gravity of course begins to accelerate it down Toward the center of the earth as soon As the string is no longer influencing the ball And so it will move on a projectile motion curve A parabola after it's released But nonetheless for that moment in time Just as it's freed it's only moving In a straight line determined by its velocity vector Just before I release the string So we can see here the transition from circular motion To linear motion or projectile motion By removing the influence that was once holding the object In circular motion Let's do a little experiment Using some simple graphical tools That would be available on any modern computer I'm going to use a video playing program To snap frames from a video And save them to disk as images I'm going to use a power point like program To load those images and then draw arrows on it And I'm going to use those arrows To make predictions about what I would expect For instance the motion of the tennis ball to do When I release the ball from my hand By letting go of the string So to begin here is the still frame Of me at the very moment that my hand Really stops making contact with the string And now the ball is no longer held By the influence of my hand along the string In circular motion It is this moment that the velocity vector Of the tennis ball will determine its ultimate fate What's neat about this is that Even though I've extracted a still frame From a slow motion video The tennis ball appears as a green blur And the length of the blur Is a little bit like taking the derivative Of the position of the ball At a very tiny moment in time You know perhaps one hundredth or one two hundredth Of a second This blurring motion is a stretched line In space that indicates it Sort of that instant of time That one two hundredth or so of a second In time What the sense of motion of the ball was Where its velocity vector was pointing At the moment I released it And we can use a power point like program I'm using LibreOffice Impress Which is a free open source Presentation creating software framework And I'm going to take the image And I'm going to overlay a little red arrow After darkening the image So that we can better see the contrast Between the ball and the wall behind it I'm going to overlay a little red arrow Whose tail begins at the bottom Of the blurring tennis ball And ends at the top of the blurring tennis ball And kind of splits this blur in half So that it roughly points along The axis of travel of the tennis ball I'm going to extend the red arrow Out into space right up to Roughly the ceiling in this frame of video This is my prediction I've made a prediction Using the sense of motion of the tennis ball At the moment it's released And knowing that once an object is released From circular motion because the influence No longer acts upon it That it will move along a straight line Determined by its last velocity vector While it was in circular motion I can make a prediction that this red line Indicates the approximate direction Of travel of the ball Certainly this tells me it won't go Anymore Now of course we know that the tennis ball Is in projectile motion once it is released From the prison of being attached To the string attached to my hand And so gravity is going to nudge the ball Down a little bit and in fact if we skip To a later frame where the tennis ball Is about to strike the ceiling Indeed we see the tennis ball Is a little bit below where the prediction Was but that's okay we know gravity Is pulling that ball down toward the floor The whole time it's traveling even though Nonetheless this is still a pretty good prediction Even ignoring gravity which is what I did to draw this arrow we did okay And the ball is moving fast enough That the acceleration of gravity over the short Period of time the ball is flying Free through the air is not that great We can even run the video And overlay the arrow And watch as the path First begins under the arrow And then gently as gravity nudges The ball down in the vertical direction It deviates a little bit from the red arrow And nonetheless this is a pretty good prediction Considering the fact that I neglected gravity And we know about projectile motion We know that this ball is supposed to fall Under the influence of gravity And so it's not a surprise that it winds up A little bit below the head of the arrow Pointing at the ceiling So we have here a real laboratory With just video and still images And some presentation and drawing software That we can use to play around With predictions of the natural world And see whether our notions of the gross Implementation will be correct And that's pretty powerful Let's review the key ideas that we have seen In this section of the course We've seen that some motion occurs Not along straight lines But rather along circular paths That require at least two dimensions In order to be described We've focused on an example With an x and a y component And considered the motion When the object in circular motion Has a constant speed along the circular path To come to understand the nature of the acceleration It is a center seeking acceleration That doesn't change the magnitude Of the velocity But does constantly alter its direction And so we have been able To come to a mathematical description Of this kind of acceleration This centripetal acceleration Using the tools of vectors, calculus Space, time, and velocity


What is going on everybody is Stas here welcome back to another video So in this video, we're going to be doing an overall market update looking at the Dow Jones the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq We're going to be talking about one trade that I made today on the 22nd of February in 2019 As well as taking a look at some other stocks and ETFs that performed very well today And that I see potential in over these next couple of weeks So for everybody out there that enjoys the content here on YouTube you find value in these videos Feel free to hit that like button down below guys It really does help the channel grow and if you're actually new to the channel and you want to stay connected with our community There's a free discord group chat. You can click that down below as well We have about 500 600 members in there and we're talking on a day-to-day basis about strategies stocks What we're watching right, you know news in the stock market and just bouncing ideas off of each other and just chatting pretty much all day guys So the groups got to the point where we're talking pretty much all day around the clock about stocks trading investing news Everything that this channel is about so again if you guys want to get in there if you're not already in there Links down below in the description box hop in there shoot me a message and we can chat So let's talk about you know, what's going on right now in the overall market We can see well You can't really see the clock here in the top right corner But it's 2 40 p.m. At the time that I am recording this video and if the market were to close right now We would end the day on a green day. We see the SPX is up around eight dollars up around point three percent right now The Dow Jones is up around eighty eight dollars up around point three percent as well And the Nasdaq right now is actually up the highest out of the three major indices up around point four one percent Up around thirty dollars on the day. So who knows guys Maybe when I'm done recording this video and the next hour passes. We end up turning red That could potentially happen right but at the time that I'm recording this it's looking like we're pushing green right all the major Indices they're continuing their up trends that we've been talking about over the past couple of videos and let's just dive into some specifics Here on the SPX the Dow and the Nasdaqs We can get a better understanding of where we could be potentially moving over these next couple of weeks So for all you guys that have been paying attention to the markets and especially to these videos here on YouTube We've been talking about these two resistances on the SPX the one being at around 2790 where we're trading really close to right now actually and the second one being at around 2815 dollars these are two resistances from the massive sell-off that we saw you know in the beginning of October and 2018 all the way towards you know the end of the year towards Christmas time is when we saw this big sell-off You know creating these two resistances for us to break through if we want to potentially test those all-time highs again in The stock market and pretty much guys over these past two three trading days pretty much like this whole week Honestly, we've been having trouble getting above this resistance, and if we take a look closer On this 30-day 90-minute chart we can see that right we can see on the 19th of February as well as the 20th We had two consolidation days pretty much under that resistance having difficulties breaking above it the next day We actually dipped even lower possibly you know at this point We possibly thought this was the point where we were pulling back But with the pattern that we see today guys This is the continuation of the uptrend putting us again at this resistance So judging off of this chart here guys We're still continuing the uptrend the fact that we pushed up to a higher high today tells us just that But keep an eye on this the latter half of the day today on this rejection Right at that resistance. We were just talking about right this could be the sign that we want to see For an official pullback back down to the 50s and may here where we ended up holding yesterday Or possibly if we break that 50s and may we could be headed towards the bottom of this channel Which has been a support over these past couple of weeks here, right? We can see that here guys the support level pulling back here does not seem you know two out of you know, two out of the reach here For that to happen, right? So we can see that very clear guys That's what I'm pretty much watching for this upcoming week Are we gonna end up breaking out of this resistance this upcoming week and out of the top of this channel? Which is gonna be a very bullish move or are we gonna get rejected test that 50s and may support again and then Potentially test this support level at the end of the trend line at the bottom of the trend line Only time will tell but that is what we're facing right now in terms of the SPX Judging on the Dow Jones very quickly guys. We can see This one very similar, you know, we saw the big sell-off and you know the latter half of 2018 We all know that by now we bottomed off at around 21,700 and we've been uptrending for the whole year of 2019, you know, pretty much right the whole entire year We've been going up in price and we've noticed that we broke the resistance from the beginning of December here from 12 slash 3 when we tanked all the way down to the lows So that's a good sign that we're now trading in between the channel of that resistance Which is now a new support and the previous resistance at around 26,200 dollars so keep an eye guys if we do push green for the next couple of days You know, this could end up filling to the top here previous resistance and honestly pushing us to the top of this channel So this level here about three four hundred points above from where we are right now in the Dow Jones This level could be the spot where we could see, you know, potentially the Dow push to which is honestly my goal target price Right now for the Dow Jones So, you know, very similar technicals here to the SPX guys We're trading in this channel here on these longer term or rather these mid-range term charts here like the 30-day chart and One more green day pushing us to the top of this channel to that resistance Doesn't seem too out of reach now as well, you know in terms of this Dow Jones chart and the NAS that guys You know like we said up around point four percent right now And this one's been struggling to get above the seventy one hundred dollar level really for a while now Not really a while, but you know about ten days Which does seem like forever in terms of a you know trading days sometimes, but that's a whole different story But you know, this one's been struggling for ten days at this point to get above this level And if it does end up getting to that seventy one hundred dollar level, you know I'm gonna be looking to see if it's gonna fill to the upside here to that previous resistance at about 7200 which was from the beginning of November in 2018 when we took that big dip guys So nothing crazy not much movement so far today Who knows the markets could end up turning red in this next hour and 15 minutes that we do have open But as of now, you know, if we closed today, we'd be up point four point three percent And it would just be another you know regular day You know another regular small green day in the overall markets But again things can change and the snap of a finger. Who knows guys sometimes crazy things do end up happening So let's talk about what I ended up trading today a very quick day for me today guys You know on a little quick day trade on Jane Nugget for those of you guys that were in the group chat this morning We were talking about Jane Nugd due to the big pullback that the gold futures actually have been taking over these past couple of days And for those of you guys that have not been paying attention, you know gold futures were at about 1350. I believe About three days ago or something right three four days ago They were at 1350 and we took that big pullback breaking below the previous resistance at around 1330 which was a new support So the fact that we did break that that kind of worried me for potential bigger sell-off and gold You know fortunately and why I ended up trading it today We did not get that bigger sell-off But we ended up holding on that 50 SMA at around 1325 which ended up opening my eyes to this trade today guys so we can see we broke that You know we broke this resistance here or the previous support or actually the previous resistance Which is now a support we broke it But we ended up holding the 50 SMA for the higher low and this is honestly telling me that we're continuing This uptrend pattern in the gold futures So I ended up taking a very quick day trade today in Jane Nugd which pretty much goes up in price when the gold futures do go up in price And if we take a little bit of a closer look here on these futures you can see 1350 We topped off we pulled back getting rejected by the 50 SMA and the 180 SMA and we noticed To breakout patterns here to the upside. What do we notice? We see the double bottom here, which is a sign of a reversal to the upside very good sign here And then we see the 50 SMA You know the break above the 50 SMA and the brick above the 180 SMA That's a second sign and we honestly see three signs because the 50 SMA is also crossing above the 180 SMA which does show or a issue rather, you know bullish bullish movement in a stack in to see you know future ETF whatever you're doing your research on right that issues that's really showing that there's more bullish potential in that particular chart So we see all those different signs here, which opened up my eyes to Jane Nugd today And we saw Jane Nugd was up around six percent I believe or something but I caught it this morning on this little push to the upside literally guys for a very small trade It was like a point seven percent profit literally I just wanted to lock it in very quick because it was Friday I'm having a pretty good week this week and I didn't want to end up screwing myself over on Friday You know last day of the week. I always like ending off strong and pretty much That's what I ended up doing guys, right? We saw that big sell-off in gold this morning if we do notice on this shorter-term chart We see the sell-off here this morning down to back down to about 1320 and then we see the big bullish moves You know into the market open starting at around 815 a.m. We see those two big pumps back up to 1330 we held that heading into the market open and then we slowly started to make those higher highs higher lows all the way up to around 1 p.m. Actually, but this was after I ended up selling off and now we're seeing the big dump So where did I end up trading it guys? It was just a very quick You know point seven percent profit trade here nothing too crazy ended up getting in I believe at around This was at like 1015 or something like that ended up getting in at 1015 and literally Scalping this one very quickly and for in the matter of like 1015 20 minutes here guys literally from 1015 up to Around 1035 quick little scalp on Jnug. That was my day trade for the day for those of you guys have been watching the videos I actually didn't day trade much this week because I've been swing trading three separate stocks One being Microsoft that actually went up like crazy today If I held my position in Microsoft, I would have made an extra 1.5 2% Ended up taking my profits yesterday playing it very safe And for those of you guys that missed that video go check out that video from yesterday I talked about my Microsoft trade, but I took a 2% profit roughly on that trade yesterday That was one of my swing trades another one is cat guys, which I'm still actually holding This one's looking like it's gonna close the day down a little bit You know I'm up still on this position because I did get in on this initial break above the 13775 138 You know support resistance here, but I'm up a very minimal amount right now guys I'm pretty much at my break even price and I'm actually possibly considering in this next hour or so Closing out my position In cat, but I do want to see you know if it does seem like it's holding This resistance as a new support heading into the weekend I might consider holding it through and I guess I'll just update you guys on that You know on Sunday's video. I'll let you know what I ended up doing, but as of right now I'm pretty much barely green on the position I'm pretty much near the break even price and I'm considering whether or not I'm still considering whether or not I want to cut not really cut But just take my profits or just sell out of my position again I'll just let you guys know in the next video So that's just a quick little update on cat ticker symbol CAT so another one that I'm actually still holding and as one of those three swing trades that I was talking about is J&J guys and this one did very well today at one point I do believe it was up around a dollar per share today and this was right before I started recording this video We can see it was all the way up to 136 62 putting it up around a dollar dollar ten per share It was up around point seven point eight percent at that point if for those you guys that don't remember This is one that I've been in for a couple of days now right around the 135 ish area is where I'm holding J&J Still and I'm pretty green on this position And this is one that I am gonna be holding into the weekend Johnson and Johnson ticker symbol J&J and that's just pretty much the update for that one Not really much to say about it still green on it and planning on holding that one through So that is what I ended up doing today in terms of my trading guys quick little update on those swing trades and Another one that I want to talk about today. You saw it in the title was you guys guys ticker symbol UGAZ So today we're seeing a break in natural gas That seems very very bullish and for those of you guys that have not been watching my videos I've been talking about Multiple patterns and indications that are showing on a technical basis that natural gas is Reversing to the upside and let's go over those now very quickly for those of you guys that have not watched this beat of those videos and Guys, this is showing a great great potential for you guys, right? We've been talking about this and let's just take a look at it right now So the first bullish sign or reversal pattern rather that we're seeing is the double bottom That's the first one we're seeing here double bottom at 255 Meaning that that's a good chance that you know natural gas is pushing to the upside, right? That's one sign. We're seeing the second sign We're seeing is the break out of this downwards trending channel Indicated by this channel right these two trend lines that we're seeing we're seeing a break out of that Which is a break of pattern to the upside that's the second sign We're seeing the third sign We're seeing here is these candlesticks breaking out of the 50 SMA resistance to the upside and eventually out of the 180 SMA resistance, that's another sign We're seeing and another sign even another sign. We're seeing the 50 SMA breaking above the 180 SMA That's a very bullish sign as well and the last one we want to see guys is a break above 270 which at this point we are right at that price. So if we do break 270 That's gonna be a huge bullish move to the upside for natural gas Which with the next resistance being at around 290 guys So from 270 to 290 this could be the next gap in natural gas meaning you gas is gonna go Absolutely berserk if this does end up happening and this is the number one ETF I'm actually watching for this next week and my personal opinion guys We're already trading above this previous resistance, which is now a new support in terms of you guys with the next resistance being at Around 36 dollars. We're already breaking above the 180 SMA and we see from here to that next resistance There is about 12 percent margin of profit in terms of you guys So I'm watching you guys very closely guys And if we do end up breaking that 270 level in terms of natural gas We start to close the gap up to 290 That's gonna be a huge huge huge indication that you guys are gonna be a pretty good play and I'm personally Probably going to trade that you know that ends up happening. So you guys guys watch that one very closely This upcoming week It's looking pretty solid and just to talk about some other stocks that did very well today And I'm kind of bummed out because I literally called these stocks out I talked about these stocks in a couple of videos this week and I didn't trade them Right, don't you kick yourself when you call out stocks? They go out perfectly to what you call them out to go and you don't trade them, right? So the first one I didn't personally call this one out somebody in the discord called this one out first I started watching this one and this one is why why and this one literally did exactly what we talked about in yesterday's Video and I didn't end up trading it and for those of you guys that watched yesterday's video We were talking about this one on the big pullback from 75 down to about 70 But it was holding the uptrend, which was very attractive You know in this particular stock and that's what we were talking about in yesterday's video And what do we see here today guys? Well, it held that and held that uptrend Yesterday actually yesterday. We saw it consolidated all day slowly started to push up Towards the close of the day very good sign and we can see guys pretty much it held and maintain that uptrend pattern Heading into today, and I completely completely missed out on trading Why why so for those of you guys that you know saw this call out profited on it Let me know down below in the comment section, of course Don't just trade what I personally say in these videos But if you see value in the stocks that I'm trading or talking about and you understand them for yourself And you take the risk for yourself on your personal opinion, then go ahead and trade what you're Seeing on these channels on these videos, right? But don't just blindly trade what I'm saying here, right? That's the whole idea. So that's just one that did very well That somebody in the discord group chat ended up calling out that I personally talked about in yesterday's video and that I Did not trade so another one was Billy guys for those of you guys that have been watching the videos Billy is one that I was talking about a couple of videos ago, especially because we popped up above This level here up to around 1950 we pulled back ended up breaking up or testing rather the same resistance at around 1830 and we were waiting for that pop above 1830 to fill the gap back to this previous resistance back from the 14th of February and Welp guys We did exactly that right we did exactly that today up 7% in the stock up around a dollar 30 in the stock But I did not end up trading it.  I'm kicking myself, but you can't get greedy guys That's the whole entire idea here Sure, there are gonna be stocks that you call out that do well that you don't end up getting it But be grateful be thankful for the profits that you did make which in my case today I made money on Jnugg. I made about point seven percent Which is a fraction of what I could have made if I traded this but the whole idea here is that I'm still Thankful, right? I'm glad that I'm able to be green and be consistent because that's the whole entire idea here You know to becoming a good trader in general. You have to be consistent, right? That's the whole goal So I missed out on Billy I'm not too mad, but I'm still kicking myself a bit But I understand that it does happen and you got to just focus on the next trading day when these types of things do Happen so for this week guys what I'm gonna be waiting for is you guys first and foremost I'm gonna be watching Jnugg to see if gold continues that uptrend Jnugg is gonna be doing very well I'm gonna be watching Billy possibly to see if it breaks out of 1930 this one could continue to run if it does do that guys if we do see the breakout That could be a good spot or if we pull back and test the support again We could be forming some sort of horizontal pattern here Horizontal channel which we could be trading in and out of for a couple of days that could also happen there I'm gonna be watching. What's the other one? We talked about of course J and J Cat ticker symbol CAT to potentially add more money into those and honestly guys That's pretty much it. You know if the markets do end up pulling back this week I'm gonna be trading TV IX which goes up when the overall markets are you know selling


So I started to work on the concepts of demarcation of those things investigated by empirical sciences and those things that we consider through mythic and metaphysical types of ways of looking at the world.  And in their traditional description of themselves they do not describe themselves as separate in the world. Nature and culture are one and the metaphysical is very important in terms of interpreting the world. But demarcation can be powerful and in this case it does not necessarily move to all cultures. So the world view that is central is that observations are about life and death and they're pragmatic for survival decisions but they are not removed from the spirituality in which you live. And to come to reconciliation between the observed and the observer when removed in time or place in some sense we can return to the concept of emic and etic in anthropology. The person telling you what their life is like and the anthropologist is interpreting what they said. And of course for us as archeologists who work in this stuff we don't have that other place to go. The negotiations of meaning between actors and shared spaces and time crossing contingencies of cultural differences are not there for us. We have only one side of it. In many of the decisions exemplified in material culture however and environment landscape choices are available to us. But we have to always be aware that we are working our own taffanomic process as we do this kind of analysis. And that we are captives of our own methodological and theoretical time. Lacking face to face interaction and seeking explanation I am suggesting that we can turn to our reflexive selves. We really have to get in there and we have to consider how the contemporary mind is defined now. It is this contemporary mind and its filters that will stop us from being able to move into this wider expanse that other cultures see. Here we can reach the potential to become aware of our methodological conditioning because we are the children of the myths of our own culture. We would see that contemporary mind is itself delineated in dominant sectors by Western tradition.  I put this in because we published on this pot. This is a pot that is a moving picture. And it gives you time in the way we look at time down through stratigraphy. But I want you to see this because this is very, very important. Come up, you did before. Yes. This is a map of the endangered languages of the world. Now watch this. It's going to come up. These are the endangered languages of the world. Look at them. Look. This is frightening for an anthropologist. It should be for an archeologist too. Because the voices of the elders are disappearing. They're going into history. They're going into prehistory. And they hold things we can't even imagine. So what we have then is a world where indigenous languages are disappearing. And the lingua franca is essentially becoming English. Even if we capture the voices of the last speakers, we gain only a portion of their linguistic universe without the intersubjective. The meaning of specific words or phrases with no direct translation are missed. There is no rendezvous with ancient intersubjectivity. Deeper in time we can find and interpret the pragmatic, the magical, the metaphorical. Or can we? Are there actual encoded lessons for remembering an oral tradition of great antiquity as well as lessons for constructing, constituting, life way teachings whispering to us from the past? Can we recognize criteria for creating ancient demarcations allowing for shifting boundaries over an investigative field of greater or lesser breadth, subsuming more including less than we may have assumed to be the content? Can we consider that we may be part and parcel with the universe and thus reflect the anthropic principle? The anthropic universe is articulated by the physicist John Archibald Wheeler, one of my heroes because he wrote for us to be able to understand quantum. And he says, we are participators in bringing into being not only the near and here, but the far away and long ago. We are, in this sense, participators in bringing about something of the universe in the distant past. And as such, well, get rid of this. The most cogent question to be asked is that while honoring the data, can we come to an interpretation that if they could stand before us again, they would recognize what we're saying? Have we participated enough to bring it there? So I want us to contemplate the possibility of creating meaning that places our modern time in a way that we can reach into explanations in the past. And I bring you the late Marshak here who I absolutely adored in terms of his work and things that happened. This is a war tool out of Jordan that ended up being made into a child's wagon. So everything goes around and around. Let me go back to go to Marshak and then come back. OK, so Marshak did all of this work on early, early art. And at the time, he was sort of like, go away. And then everybody started to go, oh my God, this guy's telling us the truth. And so Marshak is an example of interpretation through the material culture of the European Ashilean and Musterian. And he suggests highly evolved potentially variable hominid capacities, highly evolved skills and conceptual in nature for planning, mapping, or modeling the territory and culture in time and space. The all-important precursor, he said, to the cultural elaboration of the European Upper Paleolithic. He claims rightly that Neanderthal and Homo sapiens actually, he called it the hominization, continued from an earlier selective process that evolutionarily differentiated us from the Great Apes, through our ability to start signing. And he said, in certain types of classes, the problem solving and symboling capacity, moving from the sign to the symbol is the big jump cognitively. And he goes on to say this, but please look at the Blombast cave now dating to 100,000 years in South Africa. Now the word artist is being added to this capacity.  Complex memory is essential for the development of transgenerational learnings that come to define cultural identity. And we can see through Popper, I wanted to go back to the other one here. Well, I wanted to see some symbols that we look at in this. We look at place, we look at measurement, we look at future planning, we look at relationships, depictions of marking through adornment.  And we look at past remembering. And of course past remembering is one of the big issues. So what we have here is that Popper tells us there's three ways of knowing. There's physical objects, which we dig up all the time. There's thought and subjective experience, some of it mostly on our side to say what's going on there. But it's in that item too. And the products of the human mind. These come together creating our cultural boundaries and forms of demarcation. We are slowly gaining insight into the development of our cognitive capacity, as evidenced by Stout in his short but informative little piece called His Tales of a Stone Age Neuroscientist. Significant for archaeologists that the evidence of developing technological complexity over time is seen as specific and diverse Shane operatoire. Currently, many North American schools do not consider memorization to be a useful skill. But contemplate the concept cells that are being discussed in our brains now, sets of neurons that group together and bring associated ideas together. And as they're called, link perception to memory. They constitute the building block for the memories of facts and events that can be used to make new associations and memories. Thus, we should not discount the depths attainable through sequential memory. The links and the resulting networks remember such memory was a repository of all we knew before the literate world came to us. And yet, invention and innovation in stories became transgenerational and inter-culturally mobile. And I refer you back to the American archaeologist Dietz and his concept of the Doppler effect. Things went out. Let's look at the technology in the musterian in Europe, but somebody did something and everybody else learned it over the continent. The new world of written was for generations, indeed millennia, restricted to elite classes. But the spoken word world remained even in the face of loss. It was indubitally mutated, altered and eliminated many oral histories, but still it hung on in many places. It echoes varying, even with varying past filters, it is with us yet. And I'd like to refer you back to Ray Bradbury and his book Fahrenheit 451, where the hero ends up memorizing books, whole books. And I suggest to you that you take the challenge, perhaps for the sequential world of memorizing, perhaps the old image epic, Bear Wolf, all 3,182 lines in the original Old English language. Somebody did that in the past. These literative lines went on and on and on to come to an era when we had written work. And it remains with us now as written texts, but now and again, there's somebody who does remember them in the voice. Sometimes cultural memory held in the minds of the elders can withstand these ravages of time. As attested to in the Gethsemane with Sowiton, here's Ray Bradbury. And I give you Hanama Sfany Johnson here. She's a chief, a traditional chief in a line where matrilineal leaders rule.  Line claims in Canada are. Ancient scheme of mountain life lived in the memories of the chiefs. The core facts of these stories were accepted from oral tradition by Canadian courts when augmented by geological and archeological record that places these memories 7,000 years back. This is a teachable moment for us. For the Geth Kan, what Sowiton and many other cultures time is not merely unidirectional. It can be linear, but I have some stuff over here afterwards, we can play with and look at it. It actually spools back in itself and comes forward again. Rather it is a network of relationships where there is a reiteration of cultural meanings, looping spiraling through time, myth and metaphor in code life in a memorable landscape of cultural understanding. Prescient are echoes over space time. And how am I doing for time here? I've just about done in time, I might not. So I have to move on. So what I'm gonna leave out a bit in here in terms of some of the quantum I had put in here. But I like to look at stories of transformation and transformation also goes into that anthropomorphism as well because they teach us lessons. But what I end up with in the paper I've given you is that once upon a time, there lived a giant ape in Asia. This giant ape, Gigantepithicus, went extinct about 100,000 years ago, but it had lasted for nine million years. And it is in a sense for some Asians and some North Americans too, a pre-atomite story that perhaps never made the Bible. It is possible that this critical time overlap of this giant ape with Eurasian forms of Neanderthals and Denisovians and the advent of the genus Homo out of Africa met because certainly when we look at the description of this animal as it comes to us as Yeti, Bigfoot, Sasquatch, it talks about in an anthropomorphized way because it talks about long hands down as long and it's human face and so forth. I am suggesting to you that these stories of great psychological import came forward as diverging biological and cultural histories and extinctions occurred. This was a tough time. Gigantepithicus walking upright, walks through time through the memories of the stories that hold still. And what is even more interesting when we see this? Please note the timeline for these three species of humans. And I put the green in where they come across each other. This is about 100,000 years ago. And please note the distribution now of what those that don't do Yeti, the blue-covered area, and those that do do Yeti into North America, the red area, which is exactly the area where this happened 100,000 years ago. So I'm suggesting to you go for it. Dig through time, get out of your current mindset, go to mythologies of others and see if they can tell us something, something more about what's going on. And of course, the big thing I'm working on right now on all of this is how does this memory stay in cultures? I'm going to suggest to you it stays in cultures because the cultures have a different idea of time altogether. Linear time I have and a piece over there with the dots that we can cut it into pieces and disappear it. And of course, we see linear time up here at the top. See if we slice it, we get different stories. Then if we do it another slice the other way, we have two, two, one, none. And my big thing is that I'm suggesting to you that linear works have spirals back and forth, but I like mobius better. Mobius is everything all together. And I have a mobius I'm going to do over here that we can see afterwards. And I want you to think about that for most of us, we are still in our infancy on shared ideas about current scientific concepts of time. Craig Callender, who's another one of my heroes, asserts that we are the descendants of the age of enlightenment and live in linear time. There is context and contradiction, not in place, but in time itself, because essentially time in the universe is static. For us, the metaphor of time as flow of a river is actually an illusion. And yet is through imagining time, I want you to consider a possible story of nearly unimaginable time depths. And for this, I end with a small demonstration after we're all done here. Thank you very much.


Whenever you're ready. My name is Chris. So I work for SolarFix. We are an innovation that we are able to provide a storage unit for for farmers to do their most harm. We give them an opportunity to expand the life cycle of our product so that they can be able to look for market just before the season is over or even after the season is over. Do you want to explain like maybe how it works in the photo? So it's pretty simple. So we have a storage unit. It's solar powered. And then it has air fans just controlling the temperature within the air. And it has different shells where you can place the products over.


This is an American air base in East Anglia, on the east coast of England, one of many such bases from which American fighter planes swarmed up into battle against the German air force. Planes known as the P-47, the Thunderbolt, a fast, tough, high-altitude fighter with a dive like its name, and an eight-gun blast in its wings. The Lightning, the P-38, master of the air in many theaters of war with its long range and concentrated firepower. The Mustang, the P-51, the longest-range fighter in the world. Speed, fast climb, quick dive, tight turn. Into these three great fighters America poured its genius, its millions of man-hours of labor, its faith in victory against the Luftwaffe, and in their single cockpits it placed these men. Relaxing now, but not for long. At headquarters, 8th Air Force, General Doolittle is discussing fighter protection. The 8th Fighter Command will give fighter cover, two targets, and back from the targets. It is desirable that we peel off as many fighters as possible to come down east of the roar, and straight ground targets. The bomber plan, timing, altitudes, strength, course, and targets reach the combat operations room at headquarters 8th Fighter Command, Major General Kepner commanding. A field order goes out. Sixty-second group P-47s will escort heavy bombers over enemy coast through target to limit of endurance. The machinery is set in motion. Now comes the briefing for the mission, and everybody present. These Thunderbolt pilots are veterans of many missions, so the Colonel gives them only the essentials. They are to escort the bombers to a target about 40 miles east of Mannheim, and then proceed to the strafing of air drones north of Frankfurt. They're given times of takeoff, rendezvous, escort, strafing. The pilots make notes on the backs or palms of their left hands. It warns them that they may expect considerable enemy opposition today. The Germans have brought in some 100 single-engine fighters. On the field, planes warm up. It's takeoff time for the Thunderbolts. At other bases, time to the escort schedule, the P-38s get underway, and it's still others. The long-range mustangs go to keep their rendezvous with the bombers someplace deep in Germany. Somewhere out there over enemy territory, near or far, in the long route as the bombers go out and come home, each of these formations will make rendezvous at a certain point on the exact minute. The Thunderbolts climb steadily over the channel into hostile skies. Next to rendezvous, and in the distance of the bombers, advanced formations of an armada perhaps a hundred miles long. The Thunderbolts maneuver for their escort position. Each pilot searches the sky, constantly watching for the main enemy attack, which may come near the coast or deep in Germany, or hit and run sneak attacks by the enemy's aerial snipers, and then at another rendezvous point comes a group of mustangs to relieve the Thunderbolts. The Thunderbolts break escort, they head for home, watching for every possible strafing target on the way. The mustangs far in the distance sweep the surrounding sky as they come in to take the places held by the Thunderbolts. One of the most important features of long-range fighter escort is this relay system. Because of the differences in bomber speeds and the need of much weaving, fighters used up their gas. Thus, the same group of fighters could remain with the bombers only 25 to 40 minutes out of a six or eight hour mission, going and coming. And a thousand fighters might be needed to keep anything from 40 to 100 on the job at all times. While the enemy could strike with 250 at any point he selected, our fighter groups had to relieve at rendezvous points all along the route. But on the German side, the Luftwaffe was forewarned an hour and a half in advance, even as our bombers gained altitude over England. This captured German film shows how quickly their 109s and Falk Wolf 190s got into action after a warning. They had plenty of time to mass their fighters at a chosen point of attack and to outnumber our escort at anything from two to one to ten to one. They were as grimly determined to stop our great daylight thrusts into their industrial heart as our bombers and fighters were resolved to press them home. Meanwhile, deep in Germany, the group of escorting mustangs watches every corner of the sky, weaving ahead, above, below and all around the bombers like a screen of destroyers protecting the main fleet. They don't have long to wait for another rendezvous. This time with the enemy, they get rid of their long range wing tanks before the fight and down they go for the kill. With a touch of a finger on the stick, a camera and eight machine guns are put into action. Small cameras set on the wings make the record. Too often, poor pictures due to gun vibration, but they let you see what happens in the instant of action as the pilot sees it. The enemy fighters are massing for an attack on our bombers, while our pilots watch every move of their varied tactics. The juries make a sneak attack on our bombers from behind. Gun camera film, captured from the enemy, reveals how they hammer out bombers with their 22 millimeters. A B-17 catches fire and goes down in flames. This one had half his tail shot off, but it's still going ahead. We lose another, but they can't stop us. Our fighters, often heavily outnumbered, engage the enemy all over the sky and this battle is only one of many, day after day, month after month. Mustangs, thunderbolts, lightnings against the enemy 109s in the Park Wolf 190s. Our fighters attack, attack, attack, two into ten, six into fifty. They block the enemy's mass assaults until our victory column soars at the rate of four to one. If a missed rendezvous or other misadventure, due usually to blinding weather, prevented fighter protection somewhere, the bombers suffered heavy losses. But no American fighter ever failed them because of enemy odds, however great. Never was a mission turned back by enemy action. Ever-increasing fleets of fortresses and liberators pressed onto their targets and dropped their loads. When the day arrived when a huge eight-there-force bomber mission with full fighter escort was flown to Berlin and back without a challenge by a single enemy fighter. But before that eventful day, the thunderbolts, lightnings and mustangs had another mission to perform. Our bomber and fighter losses were strikingly less than the enemies, but the home front sent us more bombers and fighters and more well-trained pilots and our fleets grew mightier by the month. However, the enemy's first-line operational strength was maintained also. The Great Air Battle of Europe was still undecided. In February 1944, there was a sudden change. Our fighters were ordered to range wider to seek the enemy in the air and on the ground instead of waiting for it and above all to follow him to his destruction. A gigantic fighter battle raged across the European skies with victories by our fighters alone of 60, 85, over 100 destroyed each day. The fight came down from almost invisible heights to the final decision, perhaps only a few feet above the ground. Enemy warplanes of every kind and in fantastic numbers were splashed all over the landscape of northwestern Germany and occupied Holland, Belgium, France. This was a crucial battle. Both sides were aware of the coming events with air domination itself at stake. Once again, a better cause, better planning and leadership, better equipment, and beyond everything else, the valor of our fighter pilots gave us victory. Only this time it was decisive. So many of the enemy's aircraft exploded over his own forest and housetops or were driven flaming wrecks into the ground. So many of his famous fighter leaders met death at the hands of our pilots. That is morale was shattered. His defense plan was smashed. Quickly our fighters seized their opportunity. Since the enemy did not come up to fight, down they went to blast his planes to pieces and burn them on his own air drones all over western Europe and in the very heart of Germany. It was the most savage and devastating fighter attack on record, returning from unchallenged escort duty and on many special missions. They burned his aircraft by hundreds from one airfield to another. Intense enemy flak, sheets of machine gun fire from flak towers and ground installations caused us heavy losses. Four times as many as the same number of fighters would sustain an aerial combat. But our fighters never flinched and by their courage, face destruction in single engine planes only a few feet above the ground and 500 miles from their bases until they had smashed the heavily concentrated frontline operational strength of the German Air Force forever. Now that the sky was ours, another great opportunity became ours too. The destruction of the enemy's transportation system that fed and supplied the great armies counted on to repel the Allied invasion forces. The enemy's roads and railroads were struck with the mighty force of air power. These were tense days, crucial days and both sides knew it. Our fighters freed by their bitterly won victory in the air became a dominant factor on the ground. They exploded locomotives by the thousands and burned freight cars in uncounted numbers. No train in daylight hours was safe. No target too small. Even a single railroad car. No marshaling yard, a haven. The enemy's desperately needed rail transport system was shattered all over the map. They attacked his barges, his oil tanks, towers, radio and radar stations. Trucks carrying ammunition and supplies. Staff cars carrying high German officials. This one might have been Rommel. Road traffic of every kind and description until enemy convoys could only move effectively at night. What did this mean to the German armies of the west? How did it count on invasion day in the battle of Normandy? The answer is history. Our Gallaud armies are driving ahead without having to keep one eye cocked over their shoulders. Their gun emplacements unobserved. Everywhere about the mighty battle was and is the flash of American fighters. The Germans see them deep in their own sky and cringe. Our men see them above the grim fight and cheer. There are remembered names in the mess halls. Major Gerald Johnson, a crack shot. Major Goodson, gallant fighter. Major Duane Beeson, great tactician. Captain Eugene O'Neill, one of the best. Major Don Gentilly ran up a flaming record. Colonel Don Blakesley, great leader of fourth group. Major Walker Mejurin, one of the first and best of the great aces. Major Bob Johnson and all his victories. Lieutenant Colonel Gepreski with a great career. And Colonel Hubert Sampke, famous commander of 56. A score of victories or more are the records of them all. Duncan, Schelling, Pretti and all our gallant fighter pilots who in the decisive hour smashed the Luftwaffe and gave us freedom of the air in Europe. Just as that freedom must now be gained in the Pacific.


Everybody forced here ripping a box of the sports card Almanac multi-sport personal box edition volume 3 a Maximiliano D has box number 12 Thanks, Maximiliano. Good luck on the rip It's gonna be like There we go There we go 12 oh you're like this one too 2020 Don Rossi elite Jalen Hertz turn of the century auto gold PSA 9 That's awesome, man. Where's the numbering on this five of five right there on the right side? Big time Jalen Hertz sky looks got money right now PSA 9 2020 elite Jalen Hertz turn of the century gold auto Heck yeah, I'm actually on a fantastic time to get this card. I love the way the gold Like the parallel with it Yeah, turn of the century is great Elite that's what that's one thing is got going for you guys turn of the century in penthouse. That's great autos. I think Thanks again, Maximiliano, we'll get that right out to you