Next day. I'm going to give you a little tour of the guidelines. This is going to be more of a demo, but the websites are available if you feel free. You want to go on the UDL Center, but I'll give you the tour just to ground you in the guidelines. And remember, these are, it's one page, but behind this one page is a great deal of information and numerous resources that you can use for your planning. So we're going to kind of give you the little quick tour. As David mentioned this morning, the one-page is structured so engagement appears lost. That will change in the next version, and I did take the liberty to change it in some icon representation here. Yes. Oh, good. Okay. Great. So let's go through the guidelines. Now the next thing is going to appear rather strange because David is sitting over there at the table, but I'm going to show a video of David talking about the guidelines. So if we don't like it, but the reason I'm doing that... That's right. That's right. You can do it. No anxiety. The reason I'm doing that is so that you'll know this is a resource, because people are going back to their schools, to their universities, and they've asked on the illuminate what are the resources that are available. There are a number of resources that you have, and anything that's posted either on our site, the CAS site, or on the National Center, you feel free to use and just share the resources. So I just have a couple of little goals. We talk about the relevance of goals, so this is what we want to accomplish in this next 40 minutes, is we want to understand how the guidelines are organized, and I'm going to focus on multiple means of engagement, and then it's a pattern. Once you figure that one out, then you can figure out how to navigate through multiple means of representation and multiple means of action and expression. And the other is we're going to actually apply the guidelines to practice. And these are activities that, again, when you're sharing with your colleagues, you might want to just use them, tweak them, make them your own. So here I said, here is David. This is a little video, and on this particular PowerPoint, all of the links are on the individual screen. So when you want to get to them, they'll be on Illuminate, and you can just hook up to them.  So let's make sure we're hearing David, and what David is just to alert you. David's going to be talking about the structure of the guidelines. The unfortunate thing is this appears linear, which in fact it is not. Also, please note that the document that he is pointing to looks a little different than the document that you have. Much like what we learned from the neuroscience is, we're constantly learning and being informed. The version that David talked about, probably about six months ago, we since realized we had to revise it. So on the copy that you have, so just ground yourself on that for a minute, I want to highlight a couple of the critical changes. One is that there's arrows pointing downward, and you'll hear why that's done. The next is what David says in the video, we're critiquing it already, is the bottom three cells are where we want students to be. Our language has changed a little bit, is that when we think about expert learners, we're thinking about the bottom three cells differently, but expert learners are characterized by what falls below the bottom cells, resourceful, knowledgeable learners, strategic, goal-directed learners, and purposeful, motivated learners. And that is how we're defining an expert learner. And the guidelines are intended to help us get to that point. So now let David talk about the structure, oops, sorry, I want to make a general comment about the guidance. Typically, and in the video that you'll be seeing, we tend to go vertically, talking about perceptions and languages, symbols, and then comprehension, and it has a feeling of inching away through the guidelines through the checkpoints. I want to talk a little bit more globally, which is to say that actually the goal of UDL is, along this, for example, the bottom of the table here, options for comprehension, for executive functions, and self-regulation. But this is where we want to end up. This is where we want kids to be, that is, that they comprehend whatever is in front of them and have good strategies and know what to do. Similarly, they have great executive functions. They make good plans, set goals to themselves that are appropriate, and monitor their progress. And lastly, similarly in engagement, the effect of domain, that they are, in fact, able to self-regulate. It's not that they have to be stimulated by the outside world, that they're in charge of how things interest them, what they engage in, what they're willing to put effort in. So this is the place we want to get to. And the other guidelines are, in fact, really part of getting there. We do need to make sure that everybody can perceive the world from which they're going to learn. And whatever is put in language and symbols, we need that to be interpretable by the individuals. But it's really to get to comprehension when we want to do that. And similarly, we certainly want every child to be able to act on the world and be able to be skillful in things, like communication, to be able to write and speak and so on and so forth. But the top of this is really to get to executive functions, where they can plan a good essay or a good speech, make it, deliver it, monitor their progress and so on. So it's to get to executive functions that these others are critical. And lastly on multiple needs of engagement. At the beginning, it's how do we recruit interest? But that's too external. We move a little higher and we say, how do the kids learn to sustain engagement and persist in spite of difficulties? But the top of that hierarchy is really how do kids set good goals, personal goals, about development for themselves? How do they cope? And how do they reflect on their own development and their own engagement? So when you think about the guidelines, certainly there are three main principles and there's a verticality that goes literally from the outside in. So these are things that have to do with perception on the outside. These things have to do with physical action on the outside, these things to do with how we engage from the outside. But as you look down to this final role, it's all about the kids themselves. It's internal. The kid is what's driving. So what we want to do is get to that. Students who are independent, self-directed, self-actualizing learners. So in an odd way, the guidelines go outside in. Each of them do that. And here's where we want to end up. Thanks. Thank you, David. Great. So again, paying attention to the guidelines and now we're going to spend a few moments deconstructing this document so that you'll feel very comfortable navigating on your own. So we're going to, as I said, deconstruct. There is the principle level and the principle level are the three principles and they're very tightly connected to what David talked about this morning with the neurosciences. Multiple means of recognition, which is the what of learning. And what I'd like you to be doing now is thinking about how does this apply to my practice? What are my takeaways? So really think about your classrooms, think about what you do in your professional life. Multiple means of action and expression, the how of learning, and then multiple means of engagement, the why of learning. That is the principle level. From the principles, we go to the guideline level. Under each principle, and you can look at your document that you're looking at, there are three guidelines. I'm not going to read them. You can read the board. You can refer to yours. We're going to focus on multiple means of engagement. Remember David said from access, from external to internal. So many of our assistive technologies support external. So when you look at the questions, when you look at the top row across, you can think about your assistive technologies. And people often ask, how is AT connected to UDL? Just look at the guidelines. Look right across and say, these are where the assistive technologies come in. And then we have the checkpoint level. So we have principles, guidelines, checkpoints. And you can see this more clearly on your document, is it's all of these little 1.1. There was, I was on a professional development trip, and I came back to the staff one time and on the lunch table, there were these signs around, do away with the numbers. We want the numbers, and it took me a few moments to figure out, what is that all about? Much discussion at CAS goes along with the numbers. But I can easily say to you, okay, we're referring to 7.1. The numbers do not suggest a level of importance, but it does suggest a way that we can navigate. But there is discussion about what we're doing with these numbers. Okay, so the guidelines are available on the National Center website, www.udlcenter.org. And just to highlight what you should look at, is there is a link in very small print. Again, if you want to go online and follow along, feel free or just, this is actually a little demonstration. It's UDL guidelines. And the reason I'm pointing this out, it's a little dense to navigate. So you just have to really figure out, and you'll have these slides. So just... I've also put a direct link on the wiki to the guidelines. Perfect, thank you. Okay, and then once you go into the UDL guidelines, it's, apologetically I'm going to say it's very text heavy. And we often will jigsaw this. So if you go back to study groups and you want to work with schools, do a little jigsaw about you be responsible for reading the introduction, you be responsible for doing this. Because it really is a lot of information. But this is what will happen when you get to the main page. And again, just highlighting the critical features, so that you'll know your eye can go to the right navigation bar at any point, and you can easily navigate to guideline one, principle one, principle two, principle three. We're going to have a test at the end of this to make sure you remember all that I've said. Again, this is just the quick little. We're getting into this page looks exactly the same. Except if you pay attention, if you have a different flow of now what's highlighted, let me just see here. What's highlighted is we're in multiple means of engagement. I've navigated that through my right hand nav bar. Every guideline is, every principle, I'm sorry, is set up the same way. A little introduction, and then we go specifically into each of the guidelines. Again, I just am letting you know this is where we are, principle three, multiple means of engagement. And now we're into each of the individual guidelines as such. So if you go into the guideline, and as I said, guideline seven is provide options for recruiting interest. Underneath each of the guidelines is a checkpoint. Guidelines eight, this is external to internal. Guideline eight is providing options for sustaining effort and persistence, each of the checkpoints. And guideline nine, options for self-regulation. Now I want to highlight something. When you go into the checkpoints, we all have our favorites of whatever, but my favorite actually in this whole thing, and I tried to have it pop right up on the front page, but my favorite is the tell me more, because the tell me more gives an educator an idea of what does this really look like in practice. And what we often do in a professional development activity is say, okay, look at the tell me more.


Yes! We're here at Tai Lupus's Beverly Hills Pool Party. This is Dina and we are rolling along. This is the key. Strolling along. Yes. So we're gonna show you how to just introduce yourself to people to complete. Okay go for it. Let's see what you got. Let's see what you got. Go ahead. I'm holding the... okay here we go. We'll do it right now okay. Hey guys do it. Hey what's going on? Hey James how are you? What's your name? My name's Antonio. Antonio what's your name? I'm Doreen. What's your story?  I'm signing Kevin Hart. I just finished doing a while ago and now he's in the MTV. I'm the only Latino on season on season eight and if you're watching or wherever you're gonna post this, it all gets forth. It premieres. Nice. I like it. Can you do that? Wait what? No. No. No. Single and I like girls.  Go. Listen. YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Antonio skits. Got ya. And I like wearing condoms. There you go. So there you go. Let's just meeting a random person. Let's go. How you guys doing? James. Kai. Kai? K-Y? K-Y-E. K-Y-E. What's your story Kai? I do social media from Texas. Nice. What kind of social media do you do? Instagram. Show me. Show me your Instagram. Pull it out. Let's have a look. After a couple rounds. Yeah. Pull it up roughly. Yeah pull it up while we're... So you see what I'm saying? It's really easy.  That's it. Say hello. So look now Dina's saying hi to people. Here's a three mil page. Cool. OMG hair and makeup. Yeah. So what's tell me about your Instagram account? Oh it's like makeup artists. Nice one. Sweet. How long have you been doing this one? 3 years. 3 years. Cool. Nice one man. We're good to meet you. Doing a little video here on how to meet people in social situations. You got any tips? How do you meet people? I got some good tips. You're just going to be outgoing. Yeah you got a tip? To be like yo how's it going bro?  That's how you do it. Because you need to meet people at parties anyway. Sweet. Here you go. Some good tips. Nice to meet you. Alright so Dina's now over here meeting people. Who have you met Dina? He's trying to just take my phone off. Thankfully I don't have it. I was trying to get his number and then she came in. What's this guy's deal? He's a friend. So hit me up when you have that question. This sounds like a drug deal. Actually. Actually. I don't know what's going on here. I got the stuff. Just so you know I got the stuff. Just call me when you know what you want. Alright. Hey Dre. How you doing buddy? Good to see you. This is Dre. Say hello to my YouTube followers. And there's Jocelyn. There's Jocelyn. So I'm just doing a video on how you meet people in strangers at a party. How do you do it? How do you do it Jocelyn? Hi. Oh you were asking for my advice. I'll give it to you if you want. But how would you do it? She's good at it. I just bring Caitlin with me. Really? Okay let's do it. Here we go. Dummy Run. Hi what's your name? Hi I'm Caitlin. Caitlin. Nice. At Green Gourmet Girl. At Green Gourmet Girl. There you go. That's how you. And that's how it's done. You can't put glasses like James so I feel like I'm able to do the video. You want to wear a pair of cool glasses? Hey Dina. Hey Dina. Jocelyn wants to model the swanis just for a second here. Oh my gosh. Can I? You're the chosen one. Oh my gosh. I was like that. You're the chosen one. Can you put them on me? Yes.  Count to five. There you go. Naturally. Try and get another pair. Let's try that. Let's get. Let's get. What's your name? Samantha. What is it? Samantha. Samantha. Oh these are not. Oh these blue blockers.  Oh they're very nice. Hi. Oh so you sleep better? Yeah that's right. This guy's wearing a pair of blue blockers over here. Blue blockers is the truth. It's 97 man. Yeah it's 97. That's true. He's got the original pair. I agree. That's nice. I like that. You need a pair of these. Oh what? These are my swanic blue white.  Yeah. Let me try. You want to swap? We'll do a little swap here. These are the original. Oh yeah. Does it make sense? Wow everybody looks better. There you go. There you go. Damn. Yo I just changed my mind. 15 years. You know that's important in life.  Today's a new day man. Yeah there you go. I'm with this. Black blue blockers. There you go. He's got the new pair. Well done. Hey I'm James Swanic. Thank you so much for watching this video. If you want to watch my next video then click here. If you want to subscribe to this channel to get new videos click here and if you want to follow me on social media like my snapchat right here you can see my snap. Click on the links down there. Go on do it now. I'll wait for you. Snapchat. Snapchat me.


It's really nice to visit for a really nice city of so many years. We cannot not actually be kind of for this presentation, that you see another version of the content at the end of the presentation, but you might guess this is about the program, how to organize good elections by using some program. So there are many challenges that you are organizing, but there are many challenges. First challenge is about the privacy. You want to keep the word from everybody and try it. There is no need to know about how important it is. So, of course, it's technically only important. Also, it's very important what can be changed. So, of course, what you do should be good and friendly. You have not to be very sophisticated. Otherwise, people cannot vote. And also, of course, it's also very important is the assurance. So you can, how you are, how you can verify that you are taking the vote. Actually, what the privacy and assurance, these two things are comparison to each other. So you want to keep the vote and try it, but also you want them to be verified. Somehow it's very hard to vote. So, the first thing, the first challenge, you want to make sure that that's what we're telling. So if you want to know, then what we're going to do, yes, are we going to vote. So there is some bad guys, and since we can change your vote somehow. So, they say, yes, you must know. So, this is what bad guys have played, like us. So, also, I'm not going to count in disgusting. So, if it was a yes or a no this game, but the way how they wanted to vote, it was like one extra vote. So, and then, who are the potential suspects? So, politicians, they want to fix the results somehow in their favor. So, it's obvious, but to somewhere else, and for somebody, in case of an issue, election officials also can go through cheaters as well, and voting some of them, maybe some of the people inside are in the software. So, actually, we can see that almost everybody in voting the next person can be a cheater. So, you know, pictographers and pictographers are going to do that everywhere. This is not the case in real life, but you always think the best side, okay? So, are you voting system manufacturers? The first thing that you are voting system provides end-to-end 25 million. So, you can't verify it. You're not, first, you're not the end-to-end. So, which means vote. So, each vote should be able to verify that this vote is correctly discussed, okay? So, everyone can verify that all votes are counted as voting. The speed things is then end-to-end 25 million. So, the voting system, if you think about it, provides privacy. So, no more privacy by language during all election process. So, in spite of the system, you can't verify that all votes are counted as voting. You can't verify that all votes are counted as voting. So, in spite of existing voting, I think it's a chance to discuss the vote. So, you make sure that there will be a voting system for all votes. So, yeah, we can use some technology from... So, suppose we have four candidates. So, in our system, each candidate has a trustee. Trustee keeps some public key. And, so, and also, they are also saying that some public keys are allowed to put this as a rule of election trustee. The vote is usually in mathematics because some assumptions it, but these assumptions is quite realistic. We assume that at least one of them is honest. So, I'm not sure that all the trustees are right. But this is, I think, a pretty realistic assumption because usually, well, the trustees are the candidates which are right to each other. So, these all these trustees are one of them. Otherwise, I don't think the privacy of the vote will be revealed. So, only this will happen, but this will not happen at the moment. So, the trustees are responsible for these things. Of course, nobody will know how to use this. This is what I already said. And in the periodic system, step what is happening. So, these four candidates jointly construct election public keys. Election public keys from which you vote. And that's through the voting steps. So, when the vote that comes to the, to the screen, because this vote, this is the list of the candidates here. Like, we are four candidates. Alice, Robert, Karen, and Robert, Lisa, Lisa, usually passes in photography, but maybe in real life, we have some other cases. So, we have this candidate list. So, and then you say, okay, he gets the message, Chris is back, and we show him the candidates in the bathroom. And then, he's having a shock somehow. And then, Chris is in another bathroom, doing all the candidates, arguing in the, in the shock, and then he comes on his seat by me. And then, he presses the button. Other than that, we have to choose. We have two parts for all of you. So, all these things are happening. Just, well, it is possible, but you see the cursive three times. The button, you can press just one time, because, but you know, from a typical point of view, it can be some holes there. So, that's why we don't know yet how to do that, but we assume that the voter can read something and press the buttons. He just, and then he chooses one. He can't just read with it. So, he just pushes one of the buttons. For example, two, for example. And then, he chooses his candidate on the first part. He chooses the candidate, because he sees Alice, and he reads both. And then, when he chooses the both, and then the receipt comes over here. Then, she press the button to pass to the voter, and then you get the receipt. So, after pushing the button couple of times, you get some receipt. So, this is your ballot, how it goes there. And then, this is your, how it goes there. And then, this is your receipt. So, this receipt is good. The third is always this receipt. This is the receipt. The later on, you can check how your voter will come. So, this is the receipt ballot. And then, the other election was the database. Everyone had access to the election of the database. The election of the only database that you see, you see the balance. Okay, so, why do we need that only part? Because, well, this is to control that there was not cheating out there after the voting. So, voting machine eclipse your second reputation on the other view. And you cannot verify if the country is being violated and cannot be verified. But that's why we asked the voting machine to change their rotations. And then, we select one of them to be voted. Okay, so, to be sure, I think, this way, we can fix the cheating that you voted one or one-half. For this 0.5, we can fix the cheating, okay? So, if you can, if you can't, then you can choose any one and then check the process. If you're voting one-half, you can catch the cheating, okay? And then, well, what actions you should do, this is we don't have your receipt. So, we don't discuss how you can catch the cheating, okay? So, why do we need the receipt? Because we have a receipt. We use a kind of question as a thing of the information to check the internet that our ballot signs the text and what we want to have. And we use the only information to check the voting machine to let it fit in our 6th interpretation without cheating. We have our chosen index of the receipts. So, we can check the internet that the same index stays on the ballot and on our ballot which must be counted. So, this time we can cheat. And then we have certified the receipt. So, we can complain it. We can take some corrections in our ballot. Okay, now we go to the counting process because in MEPA this is full of justice. They do counting on the votes. Then we have our election from the MEPA, there will be an excess. And then what goes to these counters, so this part is a little from the ballot. And then only this part goes to the counters. So, they have some sub-site and then they should shortly be shipped the other part of the of the ballot. So, they can count who gets this vote. Because we cannot say anything from here. So, this is how this was put like. So, this is what you got. Now, on another non-faceted some sort of mixing phase. So, there are MEPA 100,000 votes there. So, in the mixing phase you only think about tribes or the voting. That's why you need to do some mixing here. So, the trustees cannot trace how how the sub-person vote is sold. In the mixing process so, we are let's say you have couple of trustees and you think trust is what's happening is happening some kind of mixing which is just simply totally landed. We are heading to to hide to hide to hide to hide this process of so you cannot trace trace how the vote was voted. So, in the mixing process usually it's like all the votes are mixing but it doesn't reflect actually the result of counting as a result of this mixing the mixing. Only it is for hiding the tribes for the vote. Only that. So, it's the mixing proof between the two trustees and there is interactive in terms of vote it can be true that there was no division or no insertion or no duplication so it was fair so it's it's hard to explain now how it's done but there's some part in what the vote is involved. So, you can have some it's it can be true that not happen in this mixing process and finally comes a vote count so you have a vote start after this mixing so so all candidates we have a big shift in the cyber-text a little bit of representation and it shows that okay, I get the vote for that particular for the particular for we actually get the vote and so on for everything is count so then finally so we I want to this is another version of my presentation a dirty dream for Armenian reality and question is are elections possible? Yes, I say yes because of cryptography


Another historic highlight in the Aerospace Age. On July 4, 1942, the first United States bomber attack was made on German-occupied territory. Twelve Allied bombers, six of them manned by American crews, bombed four airdromes in Holland. Air power was decisive in the conquest of Germany and proved that aerospace superiority is the foundation for success in both air and ground offenses. Because of the airplane, military strategy and tactics were radically revised. Almost every military textbook had to be rewritten to reflect the ever-increasing capabilities of air power. As a result of this well-learned lesson, America is expanding its space research and development with the realization that aerospace power is peace power.


Oh god, he brought props. You, what's the joke? Go ahead. The mask mandate. This is what I wear. I go out of the stores like, sir, you need to be wearing a mask.  I'm Rick. You can follow me on Instagram. Instagram, Twitter. Instagram, Twitter. You can follow me on Instagram. You can follow me on Instagram. What? That's my mom's.  Yeah. Anyways, welcome. How are you? Today we're doing a movie review of Toofen. Two point out now. I'm kidding. I'm kidding. Toofen, the sequel. This is called Sarpata Parambrai. Obviously we saw the trailer for it and kind of like the behind the scenes of the training. Loved it. We saw that song, the rap song. It was almost kind of like the theme of it. That we loved. That we loved. And so we were very excited to watch it. So the way we're gonna do this one, it just came out, obviously. It's a new Tamil film on Amazon. It should be a small spoiler review. Probably, right? Non-spoiler at first. That's what I meant. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Small non-spoiler. Non-spoiler and then we'll get into the spoiling.  That's just normal. We always do spoiler reviews, but normally we were watching stuff from the 1960s. But when it's a brand new release. Yeah. So if you haven't watched it, if you don't even wanna watch your non-spoiler review, go watch it. It's on Amazon and it's directed by Pa Ranjith. Ranjith. Yeah. Starring. Arya. And a big, great ensemble cast. It's an ensemble cast. So there's a whole bunch of other people that will talk about all of them in depth. But Rick, your first initial non-spoiler. Well, went into this with equally high expectations as we did with Tufan. Yeah. And started off the Tufan review by saying, you can't judge a film by its trailer and that was true for Tufan. But I am very happy to say that this. You hated it? This. Why do you hate Tamil films? But yeah, exactly. This met my expectations. I really enjoyed it. I had a lot of fun. I have one little thing about it that kept me from just jumping up and down, loving it. I'd watch it again in a heartbeat. I have nothing but mostly really good things to say about it. So thumbs up. Thank you for living up to the expectations. I really enjoyed it as well. I think this is a very, very entertaining film. Very entertaining. They did it right in terms of, you know, even though there are parts that I'll get into that, especially towards the end that might have been a little more predictable. Yeah, we'll get into full breakdown in this quarter. But not like Tufan. Tufan just, you know, I don't want to bring up Tufan every two seconds, but obviously it came out a week ago and it was a boxing film. Right. Can't help it. But compare. It's hard, but yeah. But pretty much, pretty much were everywhere that Tufan missed. Yeah, this time it succeeded. Correct. So we'll go over everything here. There were some stuff that I didn't love and we'll go over that. But overall, really good film. Definitely worth a watch. So if you haven't watched it already, go watch it, but we're gonna give you a little non-spoiler review here. I thought everybody, I loved Aria, I loved his transformation. So did I. He did, you could tell. He worked a long time on his body for this and it showed. Yeah, and the believability factor is just for the most part, across the board. I believed everybody in this thing. Oh yeah. I believed all the relationships. I believed what I was seeing. I believed these people were a clan. I believed what we were seeing as far as the era. And this is one of those things where like, like most sports films, you recognize that dude didn't get looking like that doing that exercise routine. And it's okay, you understand. They go to extraordinary lengths with the top. And it's like when you watch Rocky III, Stallone didn't get that size doing those workouts. It's called Roy's. And yeah, for Stallone, for Stallone it was without question roiding. So anyway, yeah, I loved him in it. I thought he was really good, believable throughout. I rooted for him. I cared about him. I cared about him and his wife. Yeah. And again, I'm not spoiling anything yet. I also, my next couple favorites, and I don't have, do you have any characters that you didn't like? The mom. Oh, I had a feeling you might not like that. I didn't like her. Come on. Do you mean to tell, okay, I got to get into, there's a spoiler thing I want to get into in a second about the mom. It wasn't really her acting. It was the way she was written. I feel like she wasn't written well enough. Okay, okay. We'll get into that in the spoiler section. Now, I, my next favorite, and I think it's because of a lot of reasons, not the least of which being, I didn't feel the connection and believability with the coach in Tufan. The coach was greatness. Absolutely loved him, believed him. He's a great actor. I liked him a lot. Really, every time he was on screen, I was riveted to his presence. Yeah, the wife as well. He was exactly what you need in the role of the coach. You need a guy that's gonna carry that sense of leadership, that sense of you look up to the guy who's believable, who when he's talking and he's rooting, I also want to applaud. There was both a shout out to boxing films on the way it was shot and there was a lot of new stuff. They didn't take any easy out shots. There was a lot of stuff they could do that was really easily screwed up if the actors didn't do it right. I think the whole stunt team and the cinematography team did a great job. Symptographer's great. I love the score. I thought the score was really nice. Excellent. We'll go over this in the spoilers, but I just want to kind of wrap it up here. I thought it was a very good film, definitely worth a watch. Please go watch this film. I don't say my favorite Tamil film a long time, but definitely my favorite new Tamil film that we've seen on a lot of times. Obviously we've seen really good Tamil films recently, but they might have been older. Right. The newer stuff, this is 100% by far one of my favorite ones. Absolutely. Especially even this year. I don't know that I'd put it above like Great Indian Kitchen in terms of a better piece of cinema than like that, but I put in the conversation in the top 10 currently of the best films that come out this year. I agree. It's down. If someone said to me, which of those two movies should I watch? I'd say, okay, here's the deal. Depends on what you're into. Yeah, Great Indian Kitchen's gonna give you Film Festival Oscar vibes. Yeah, this is gonna give you entertainment.  But not to say that this didn't give you like high level acting, high level artistry. Exactly. If I'm comparing what comes out this year. Right, right, right. I could even sneak into the top five. It's just, I haven't thought about it. Me too. But it is. It's one of my favorite ones and one of my favorite Tamil recents. And the only thing, and this isn't giving anything away, if you were to split this into four acts and you have an intermission, right? So you have the first two acts in the first half. Great. And acts three and four here, right? It's gonna slow down in the second half. Acts one and two are pretty much perfect. Yeah. It is, I was thinking, oh my goodness, this is gonna be a knock it out of the park, right? It's act three, where things kind of got off the rails a little bit and then it came back into itself in an effort. I agree. I totally agree. Second half wasn't as strong. It wasn't bad. Thankfully it ended. Yeah, on a high note. It caught, there was a point, I remember thinking, ah, there's what I was feeling in the first half. Yeah. It kind of came back. But yeah, that would be the biggest gripe is that the second half didn't live up to the first half. But not in terms of it was bad. It just wasn't, I give it like, if you're given the first half of 10, you're given the second half of seven. Exactly what I was gonna say. Yeah. And I was gonna say you'd give, and that would average out. You'd give like act four and eight and you'd give act three a six. It's definitely that act three segment for about a half hour, you're like, oh no, no, don't lose it. Don't lose it. 100%. So like I said, if you haven't seen it, go watch it, please. And then come back because we're gonna get into spoilers here. Time to get spoiled. Naughty. Oh my baby. So let's talk about the acting. I liked Aria a lot. We actually saw a song of his with, Sorry, you said Aria and all I could think about was Game of Thrones. I think it's Aria. With the girl from I, what was her name? Yeah, his wife? No, the song we saw just the other day that we raving about cinematography. Oh, oh, and yes. What's her name from I? Right. Anyways, but he was in that. I don't know if it'll be on the channel because it got blocked. So it's on Patreon. But I would like to see more of him because I thought he did a very good job. I believed one his transformation. I believed, I liked his innocence about it. It was different obviously than obviously what we had in Two Fun was this big tough guy.  They kept choosing different people and I'm like, I know he's gonna eventually box. And it was very believable. Yeah. Very believable. But I liked that, especially in the first half. There was a lot of very unpredictableness in the first half that I really appreciated. And I thought he put on a great performance obviously not only boxing, but even when he wasn't boxing kind of the most vulnerable side. And then you kind of turned it on when he got in the rink and became like this bowl almost. Yeah, I love that about him. He was definitely a sweetheart inside. I guess, and they're very, very different characters but that's one of the endearing qualities about Rocky is that Rocky, he's a collector on the docks and he's a washed up South Paw who gets this weird random shot at the title that he at first doesn't even think he can have. And then as you get to know him, his relationship with Adrian and Pauly, there's this really tender moment of the night before he had like Pauly. You got it. And there's this moment, the night before the fight where he's laying in bed with Adrian. And he's like, and he just admits he's scared. And you realize this is just a good guy, very different character, but I felt that same type of appeal. This is just a good guy. I loved his relationship with his wife. Loved it. Loved her. And when I griped with the film, I thought she was underutilized a little bit, especially in the second half. She was really wonderful and their relationship was wonderful. When she came on, right, she's beautiful, but the first moment that I was like, yes, was right after the wedding, she got up and danced because she wasn't allowed to dance there in the wedding. I loved that scene. And then obviously when she confronted him, not, it was before the drinking. Yeah. But when, about his life being just about boxing. Just about boxing. Right. Right. Love that scene. She did a great job. I loved their chemistry. I loved that she was a strong woman. She was like, I don't need anything from you. I need to acknowledge me. Right. I'm your wife. Yeah. You're behaving poorly. Yes. So I thought that was great. I thought in the second half, she was underutilized in terms of just, She almost became the mom of her for a while, just crying and I get, I get why. Don't, I'm not saying I don't understand why she was doing that. I just wish it was written differently. Like, so she's like, just, she wasn't just whining in the second half. Yeah. I think what they were trying to do in the writing, and I get it, is they wanted to show he hadn't really changed and gotten worse than what his mom had foretold was gonna happen, happened. And so now what the mom saw, the wife is seeing. I get it. I wish it was written differently. I agree. I would have preferred that. But I loved her character. Their chemistry was fantastic. It really was. And then, like I said in the beginning, the coach. Oh. I don't think we've seen anything. If we have, forgive us. And I know there's, I know for all of you, the millions, these actors are very well known. A lot of the cast have been around a long, long time. So forgive us for just being introduced to people that I'm sure one day we'll look back and go, remember when we didn't know who they were. Yeah. I'm sure he's one of them. He was perfect. Yeah. He was great. He's very subtle in his, but he's also brings a weight to his presence. And he also didn't try to be, Mick either. Cause that's always the struggle for me when like, if you're in a boxing, obviously it's going to be compared to Rocky or Raging Bull, right? Right. And then if you bring in a coach, kind of like, two fun day, even though I enjoyed the coach and two fun, but like it was, you can, if you're, if you have a boxing film, and then you have a coach who's this rough and tumble kind of guy. It's like, okay, now you're trying to be Mick. Right. I didn't feel like that at all. Not at all. He was a hundred percent his own character. And he was great. Yes he was. I'm sad when he was in the jail. Another character I absolutely freaking adored was Rose. Yeah. Let's talk about that scene. That was probably the best fight in the whole thing. And I loved his fricking shenanigans. Yeah. His dancing is hip thrusting. I laughed out loud several times. One of my favorite things about the film because that's not realistic, but I loved it. Yeah. It may have been, the other thing I love about the film is we're getting some history into the world of boxing and a place in the world where we're not familiar with it. That's a true story. This is based on true events. Yeah. In this part of the world, in the 1980s, and I didn't know there were clans. Was Rose real? Yeah. I believe this was a real character. Well that's crazy. Who may have been a kind of circusy character. But I never, if that's true, then great, you can let us know in the comments. But I loved it because I was like, this is so interesting. I've never seen this before. So great. I was almost running a dodge ball and like he was doing this. I was like, it's a bold strategy cotton. Let's see if it pays off. It is so good. But at the same time, he wasn't just dorky Joe. He was a believable boxer. And that fight scene was probably my favorite in the whole film. I agree. Even though there was quite a few. They were all good. Which is something once again, that this did much better than two fun ones. Had great fight scenes. Also at the end, one of the best parts of the end, it was a great training montage. Great training. I don't feel like we didn't get a great training montage in two fun. No, you know what the difference was? Again, it felt like, okay. So the training montage, they were always this way, but especially in Rocky Four. The Rocky Four montage wasn't for practicality of training. It was so that you could see what Stallone's doing next. And Stallone could show off what he's doing next. Then as a kid, I was like, oh, okay, I'm going to try that. Oh, wow, that's crazy. I felt that with two fun. I felt this was far more rooted and grounded in what they probably did. I bet they did dig in the dirt. I bet they did carry logs. And I like that it was not only him training, but it was his rival, who I thought did a great job. He was excellent. I liked his character a lot. So did I. I liked his character a lot. I believed all of the relationships with Tina and everybody. I know there's several things we probably missed. One of them was probably genius cultural references that we'd missed because we're not familiar with the culture. Little things. I know somebody sent me a shot, a screenshot of when he said I made you your favorite beef briani. And I know that there was some significance to that. That would be over our head. As well as the political undertones of what was going on that day and age. When that government was just kind of... Yeah, now for our vantage point, it was okay, that's what's going on. I get it. We know enough about India to know that government, things of that nature, corruption, can get in the way of all kinds of daily life. But I'm sure there's a ton we missed. For what it's worth, I didn't feel lost. No, not at all. At all. I feel like that's one of the strengths of this film as well is that even though it's two hours, 50 minutes, right? It's a three hour movie. It's a three hour film. Outside of that third act, it does, you don't feel it. You're engaged. The entire time. And you care about these characters. And you want to see what's, especially like the first, almost an hour, he doesn't, you don't see the guy boxing at all. Right. You see other people boxing. Right. And that's what I was like. And you're learning about him. Yep. Learning about his character. You're learning about this whole culture as opposed to just, this is our hero. Now he's going to box. Right. It was kind of almost organic. And how it came about. It was. And I genuinely had a sense of, I think he's going to win, but this movie could make him lose. And I liked it. I knew Farhan was going to win. Yeah. I would have bet everything I can on. I never doubted that for me. I never doubted for a second that he was going to win in this. I had a moment of, he might lose. And that was good to have that moment. Yeah. You know? I, the mom. No, yeah, no. I already said my piece about the mom. I feel like, just like in the third act when the wife became just like, she was crying all the time. That's what the mom was the entire time for me. So I was like, I don't care about you. I don't, I don't feel the connection between you and your son. You're just yelling and crying the whole time. And I get it. It's a cultural thing, but I just wish it was written better. You see, okay. I, here's when I knew I liked the mom. I didn't like mom. He gets in the fight. I don't remember what time it happened.  Yeah. I laughed out loud. I thought that was phenomenally funny because at that point, that's all she's doing. And anything he does, her response, she's the one person slapping and yelling, slapping and yelling. So after this climactic fighting thing, you're right. Wow. I wonder how mom's going to respond. Well, you don't even get a lead in. You don't even get to watch him walking up to the house. They just cut and he's in the middle of being beaten by mom. And I, I fell and I just, it's just difference of the way. I don't think you're wrong is what I'm saying. It's just for me, it didn't bother me that she was like that. I didn't feel like she was empty and hollow. I felt like it was born from her fears about what happened to her husband and her hopes for her kid. And then she kind of backed off and said, great, you're marrying now. Let's see what your wife thinks about it. She's going to realize the same thing about me. The thing I would have liked to have seen more, I guess better written and it's in the third act. She made for me too quick of a transition from all of her life being against it to supporting him. I think it could have been, I think it's believable to get her to the place of saying, I'm for you now. Cause that happens to Adrian and Rocky too. Adrian doesn't want him fighting, but she makes that transition and it's believable. I felt like that transition for her happened too quick. Yeah, I do too. I totally agree. But that's a small complaint. Very small complaint. And then at the end, it is just a little, little predictable. But I liked the end. Like it's a boxing film. I knew the hero's going to win. It's not a lot of boxing. I was expecting it. You can't really fault it for that. If it's a boxing film and your main hero doesn't win, that I've not seen that film. I don't believe on that warrior. Well, it's Rocky. Oh yeah, I guess. Sorry for the spoiler, but it's been out since 1976. So in the first Rocky, he doesn't win. Yeah. He just goes the distance and that's all he wanted to do. But for the most part, this was not predictable. And I did. Oh, there was another thing. I guess it's not about the film unless they did it. The censorship.  I would have loved it if they would have given Arya that moment after he's been stripped of his pants. And so you literally see him there naked. It took, it takes away from the point of them actually doing that on screen. It's like Kesa. Yeah, just like Kesa. The exact same thing happened to me. I saw it and I'm like, it's a butt. It's a human butt, guys. Yeah, you didn't even have to show his genitals. Literally his butt. We all have them. I was gonna start writing a lot about it, but I didn't want to. I wanted to stay focused on the film. I'm sure it's not about the film. I'm sure it's the censorship thing. But this is part of the problem, aside from the fact that you've heard us say this about Arya.  And it's that kind of thing that it, what it does is that's why in America we have a rating system. You know you're gonna get nudity if it's at a PG-13 or above. And if it's a rated R, you might see frontal nudity. It'll tell you. And it'll let you know in the rating. It'll say it's this rating because. So if you don't want to see that. If you don't want to see it, you don't have to.   It's never kind of like blurred out on me while I'm looking at it. So the believability factor suddenly goes, I'm involved in this really important moment. And it takes away from the actor's vulnerability in that moment. Completely. Because you shouldn't even have it in there if you're just gonna do that. Exactly. Just like in, what's it called? The one that you mentioned. Kesa. Kesa. Yeah. With Irfan and Tillo Tamar.  Like I said, it's not about the films. I don't want to run it too much. The censorship board, you know, our feelings on it. It's just, it, it, it, it. I'm glad you mentioned that. Because I wanted to bring that up. But overall the film I thought was really, really good. I was so happy that it lived up to that for us. Cause obviously there's some times that you'll love films and we just, we don't like it. We don't get it. Right.  Right. We have preferences based on something other than the artistry. That's your prerogative, whatever. But it's always great when you obviously, I hate watching films that are bent. Exactly. And for me, there's a level of, you know, if I adore a film, it goes on my all time greatest list. So this doesn't go on my all time favorites. But this does go into the list of films that I want other people to watch with me. Probably on your all time favorite tamo. Oh, that's for sure. Yeah. That's for sure. But like I'm showing my mom a lot of Indian films for her to get introduced to Indian cinema. And she loves combat sports. Loves watches it every night. All forms of it. And I watched Warrior with her, not an Indian film, but I want her to see that film. And I want her to see Dongle. I want her to see this. Especially since this would, she's now ready, I feel like the branch away from the stuff. She's getting introduced like we did. She's only seen some of the Hindi things. Now I want her to get into some of the other regional things. And I think she'd love this, especially when I let her know, hey, it's gonna be three hours, third act, it's gonna feel a little wonky, it'll get back. That's all she needs to know. Yeah, yep. But a really good film. Let us know what you thought about it. What should we be the next of any of these actors of their films that we should watch? And what should be the next tamo? I think we mentioned it. I love the score. Yeah, we did at the beginning. I thought the score was really, really good. They kept bringing back the main theme of the kind of the beginning part, the kind of used training. Throughout, I liked all of that. I just, I know people get upset when we don't make this. And the whole production design from hair and makeup to what no continuity problems on boxing makeup, which can bother me. And it didn't, costuming sets, making it feel like we were in this part of the world in the 1980s, I felt was excellent and top notch. And this is one of my favorite, top favorite films down all the time for me. Absolutely. So let us know what you thought about it. What should be the next tamo film that we watch? Down below.


Live from Atlanta, Georgia. It's theCUBE, covering AnsibleFest 2019. Brought to you by Red Hat. Hey, welcome back everyone. This is theCUBE's live coverage here in Atlanta, Georgia for AnsibleFest, part of Red Hat's annual event with their customers, their community. I'm John Furrier with theCUBE. It's Stu Miniman, my co-host. Our next guest is Jason Smith, Vice President of North America Services for Red Hat. Jason, welcome to theCUBE. Thanks for coming on. Thanks, thanks for having me.  Automated the tasks, people's jobs shift to other things. They can do more things. The service is opportunities big. Can you just take us through kind of your strategy of how you look at Ansible in context of the Red Hat portfolio? Sure, yeah, so from a services perspective, we're really responsible for ensuring customer success and successful adoption of all of our technologies so across the entire portfolio. And so as opposed to a services company that's focused on services, we're really focused on driving customer success and making sure that customers are successful. So overall from a services perspective, we have obviously our consulting, which is really focused on working with customers, implement solutions around Red Hat technologies, expanding the use of Red Hat technologies. We have our training business, which is our education and certification business, which has on-sites open enrollment, but also over the last couple years, we've released our Red Hat learning subscription, which is basically gives customers access to the entire portfolio of training on demand in a self-paced way, which has been a really fast growing part of our business. And then I think we've talked to you a little bit about this before, which is our open innovation labs, which is really focused on people in process and helping customers go through that digital transformation type of journey and focus around culture and things like that. It's interesting, you look at the interviews we've had yesterday with some of your customers, it's interesting, you have a couple different profiles. You have the man, we nailed it, now I got to bring this across the entire organization, you get a champion, driving change, other groups are standardized with that substrate for Ansible, others are like, wow, I have other stuff, I need to really figure this out. Take us through how you guys would approach those use cases because they're different, but all would want more services, some to accelerate either, say, a champion, some to get a new prospect on board. Right, so, we've played out, we released this about 90 days ago, which is called our automation adoption journey, and this is a five phase approach where we've worked with customers, hundreds of customers around the world in every phase of adoption of automation, obviously specifically around Ansible, and this really looks at helping customers go from more of a tactical strategy, typically is what we're saying today. A lot of customers have Ansible in different pockets doing a lot of tactical things that are driving a lot of value, but how do you take that and then really get to a more of an enterprise strategy? So, that's really what we've focused on, taking what we've learned with customers at all of those phases and really taking those best practices and coming up with a standardized approach that we can really work with customers to be able to get through that journey with them. So, Jason, can you bring us inside the customer base a little here? What we hear is it's really easy to get started, but when you lay out those five steps, is everybody looking to get to stage five, is that a year journey, are some people okay just being at phase two or three? Help us understand a little bit kind of, and we know it varies greatly, but some of the characteristics as to how fast they move along, where the end journey is for most organizations. Right, so as I mentioned, customers are coming in. Some have been early adopters of Ansible for a long time, so we've been working at more of a departmental level with customers where they're driving value at that departmental level. Others are kind of coming to us for the first time saying, we're hearing all about this automation stuff, we know we need it, but we need to get started. And so, we're really looking at kind of starting out, we typically start with a discovery session, and so we're bringing in our architects and consultants to come in and meet with their business and technical stakeholders to really understand where they are in that journey, and really define kind of their goals and objectives. So every customer is different, so really understanding what their goals and priorities are, and then being able to help kind of craft that roadmap with them to get through that journey. But I'd say most of our customers are looking to figure out how to take it from kind of more of those tactical implementations to how do we leverage that in a more scalable, consistent way, and be able to manage it more across the enterprise. Well, and it's a trick, because software development often is different at different parts in an organization. If you look at kind of the DevOps movement, it's trying to get a little bit of consistency across those, and it sounds like Ansible plays well to help get collaboration and those playbooks that can be used across and know that I have something that is supported and works, and my organization buys into it. Exactly, so a lot of customers are doing great things in those pockets, but like you said, how do you take those and not reinvent the wheel every time, but take them and kind of break them down into consumable chunks, kind of validate those, and then publish them so you have a standard set of playbooks that people can use and reuse versus developing them again for the first time, because we know that Ansible, you can do things quickly, but you don't want to redo them 10 different ways to do the same thing, so having that kind of blessed standardized way, and then publishing them out and managing them is really important. Great feedback from customers on that too. Yeah, and then they get more playbooks, they get more playbooks, and they got to manage that. But one of the interesting things we talked about yesterday with Stephanie Chiris on the REL side was connecting Ansible to REL. The insights was, the analytics certainly compelling. A lot of benefits there coming into the rest of Red Hat, and well, where is that opportunity, how are you guys servicing those pieces? Yeah, so we're really looking at Ansible to be part of most of the Red Hat portfolio, so as we're working with customers and they're adopting more and more of the Red Hat technologies, Ansible becomes a bigger part of that, so whether it's kind of bringing in our training to help train and enable customer associates on using Ansible, not only for automation, but whether you're a REL admin or OpenShift, or no matter what kind of products you're using, being able to have the training and enablement and services around that to help everyone learn to understand how to use Ansible and leverage Ansible across any area of the platform. You guys aren't new to platforms. Ansible has been a great product.  Yeah, so from a services perspective, we've tried to really standardize on a set of offerings and leverage kind of a consistent approach, whether it's with OpenShift for helping customers adopt containers or helping customers build a hybrid cloud, or we've even got an adoption journey around Vertelcos to leverage to create an NFV architecture. It's the same kind of process and framework. So we try to build a standardized process and no matter kind of what type of solution customers are building, we look to follow those types of... Just change this nice glue layer, kind of fits everywhere. On a personal question for you, what's the show been like here for you? Share with the people watching who aren't here, why is this year important? This seems to be an inflection point for Ansible Fest, the vibe, the number of attendees, the moment in history, the cloud journey, the on-premises, what's your take on this, what's your personal view on this? It's been great, I mean, I think just the size. Talking to a lot of people that have been coming here for many, many years, even prior to the Red Hat acquisition of Ansible, this is really a community-driven event and it's still set up like a community-driven event. You won't see a big Red Hat stuff everywhere. It's really kind of by the community, for the community. And just to see the sheer size of the number of attendees here and really kind of the evolution of what customers are being able to talk about on stage with the value they're getting out of Ansible is pretty tremendous. So just seeing the pure return on investment of leveraging Ansible and looking at all the large customers that are here speaking, even on the panel last night was really incredible to see them talk about their journeys over the last couple of years, going from just starting to be work with Ansible to really kind of driving that across the enterprise and getting continual value. They're vocal on feedback, but they're also vocal on success. They have all these building in champions inside the customer base. And they're all very, very excited about it. So when you have excited customers, it's a lot of fun. So Jason, I wonder if you could help us connect the dots with how automation ties into the other journeys customers are going through, the digital transformation, modernizing their applications, changing their hybrid and multi-cloud environments. What's the role of automation to enable that and participate in those journeys? Yeah, so Ansible really has kind of a part in all of those journeys. So we work with lots of large customers that are going through kind of different parts of those different journeys, and it seems like Ansible becomes a part of it. And so for instance, one of our customers that we're working with right now through a large digital transformation kind of across the entire enterprise from a both people process and technology perspective. And this is leveraging things like OpenShift and modernizing all of their applications and breaking down things into microservices and really transforming their business. But part of that is leveraging Ansible. And so one of the CTO's models was if we do something more than twice, we're going to automate it. And so I hear that kind of over and over again, no matter what type of customer we're working with, no matter what type of kind of solution we're implementing, they're coming up with these mantras that they get really excited about around automation. So we're not going to do things the old way. With these new projects, we want to automate everything and they're just seeing a ton of value and efficiency out of it. Awesome. What's the biggest surprise that you've seen over the past year on the services side and just in terms of enterprise readiness, enterprise appetite, adoption, any observations you could share around what's going on with automation? Obviously, observability, a big part of the business we're seeing that too. Automation, observability, two hot new sectors just exploding in opportunity. Yeah, I think just continuing to see this kind of digital transformation effort across so many different customers. And again, everybody's really focused on not only the technology, I mean the technology, especially things like OpenShift and Ansible and RHEL, they're enabling all of this change and all of this movement to the cloud and the automation. But really working with customers to focus on the people in process so they can leverage those capabilities because just adopting the platforms doesn't give you all of the benefits without changing your people in process. So we spent a lot of time talking about really around the culture and customers are looking at us saying, Red Hat Services don't just come in with the technical experts, but help us really understand how do we transform our people in process along the way to really take advantage of the innovation that's going around right now with the cloud. All right, so Jason, IBM's acquisition of Red Hat been very clear keeping the brand, the products, the people of Red Hat. IBM knows a thing or two about services though. We think that services really are the main focus that will happen there. So it gives a little insight as to how the scale of IBM will increase what Red Hat Services is able to be able to do. Yeah, so it's great for Red Hat, right? Because we now have a company the size of IBM out driving the adoption of our technology. So everything that we were able to do to date from a Red Hat perspective got us to one level of scale, but IBM's gonna take us to that next level of scale. And from a services perspective, IBM already has services departments around all of their different technologies. And so we really are gonna be treated kind of as a service department. So we're gonna continue to be the experts around Red Hat technologies. But it really doesn't change that much for us because we worked with large SIs since the time we started here. And we're always part of a lot of large SI implementations. So although IBM will be a very important partner of ours, they won't be the only partner. We'll still work with all of the large SIs. Take your playbook and apply it to IBM. That's right, and so we worked with IBM before the acquisition as a partner. We'll work with them after the acquisition. But IBM, what will change is on the IBM side. They will be building much larger delivery organizations around Red Hat technologies, which will allow us to kind of get the customer started on that journey. But when they look to really scale out and then IBM can take in and kind of take that to the next level that we would never have the scale to be able to get to that side. So it's good for us, it's good for our customers, and it's good for Red Hat driving adoption. And Jim pointed this out on many times on multiple calls around the broad portfolio you guys have at IBM. They have some more broad portfolio. Jason, thanks for coming on, sharing your insights. Thank you. What's new for you? Take a quick minute to plug in what's going on in your organization and what you're up to. Yeah, so we're just continuing to scale. So the good news is IBM has a large services organization, but that also drives a lot of demand for us. So we're continuing to scale, we're continuing to improve our offerings, we're continuing to help our customers reach those goals, move into the cloud, and everything they're looking to try to accomplish. Great, thanks for coming on, I appreciate it. It's theCUBE coverage here at Ansible Fest. I'm John Furrier, student minister. Stay with us for more day two live coverage after this short break.


This is Sally Snowborg, a teacher who taught him on the island. Mr. Hoppins. Is that me again? It's Scott's current teacher. Why don't we get one more person? Well, you know there was a Scott Hoppins in my life. In the beginning of the camp, the funding I had just was coming from our people. There are times when you can still get something right close to your house, absolutely close. And I got up and started stepping across Nancy and she suffered and she just said, You have to breathe. The stewardess thought in the plane that there was a lack of oxygen maybe, that it was starting to run out of oxygen. And my people who were sitting across the island, the one I just told a few days before, turned to your island. I did it. No. I don't want to repeat it. Well, that was just great. You're just watching for yourself. Hey. Thank you very much. Somebody said a hero is no braver than anyone else. He's just braver. Five minutes it counts. Well, thank you very much. Well, incidentally, I have a few souvenirs for all of you too. Thank you. This is a car with a seal engraved on the presidential seal and contains jelly beans. In case you don't want to open it and you get home, you and your sister might want something. There's a little sample of what's in the jar. Thank you very much. Thank you. There are some other gifts that they're going to give you. What's that? And there are some other gifts that we thought that they're going to give you later. Which is great. Please. When I get phone calls, you know, I never knew what I was saying in here.  And then she got on the phone and there were five of my friends. Ha, ha, ha. I've been on the phone since. I've been listening to everybody who lives on the phone.  I only like five of them before. I like to wait for you on the land. See, of course, you didn't know we were moving like a cycle. Yeah. We have big blue bears. Well, Smithsburg. You want to know about Smithsburg? We need to be west of here. Hey, there's one. It's about half an hour away or so, isn't it? About 20 minutes. Here. Camp David. Oh, five minutes by air. We're flying into Camp David. We're all, you know, just listening to those helicopters. And it's very close. You're right. Of course, the blue bears were just on our farm. We just come down and start riding. Atlases. Ah. And atlases. We started off on the stabbing of the mare. And I was like, hurry. I wouldn't want to take care of all those. Yeah. Congratulations. Thank you for everybody. Okay. Thank you. It's good to meet you. It's good to meet you. It's mine. It is for me. She's busy. She's busy. You are. You are. You are. I am pleased to meet. You're very nice. I'll see you. See you. You said I love you. I saw you aут. I can't be excited. You aren't the keepers of their dreams. Give our best to meet them. I'm sure we will. It's me, Alок. Just one. She didn't have to teach you how to switch it. Watch it, Mrs. That one went out.  I'm joking. She really is. Oh, I think so too. Great. You know, they just say no thing. She was speaking to some students in Oakland, California, and one of them asked, what do you do there? And she said just say no. There's the answer to the question. Today, there are over 10,000 just say no. I'm crossing. And I think that you want to be able to move that forward. Yes.  Well, thank you very much for having us. Well, thank you very much for having us. Thank you for having me. The attempt being to see if you could provide top-down guidance to our respective bureaucracies so as to improve the prospects for a productive summit meeting later this year in the United States. And the next day, I'm going to start with George to indicate the full note of Chevronasi, that we thought the proposed preparatory meeting was a positive approach. And done. We wouldn't be in any position to accept it, including given answer to the Daniel Walker matter was settled. And that is to say after they agreed to his release. And once they did agree to that, we have told them that our choice would be of the countries each selected Iceland and suggest the dates we're going. And the choice of the location was intended to emphasize the private preparatory nature of the meeting and some meeting and some European school has been proposed. The date was in response to his and my desire to move ahead the summit planning as much as possible. And it was important that we get whatever top down guidance that he and I might agree on nail down as much as possible. Especially if there's to be any hope for a true summit meeting here. First, we're going into this meeting I think with a very strong position. This is a meeting that he very much wanted but is very much I think in our own best interests also. And second, I believe face to face and deal with position of pretty good strength with our counterpart. But it's important that we do not let the agenda in Iceland be limited to arms control as they apparently are talking and would seem to indicate that's their desire. We think that regional conflicts, human rights and bilateral issues will be equally important as a part of the agenda. And if the discussions there are successful to move us closer to agreement, I think that a meeting of this kind can only succeed if our government is united. You've heard me say this over and over again and I can't stress the importance enough. I need your bipartisan support. On occasions in the past where it was clearly in the national interest to unite, we've done this and I at every conference would do so again on this occasion. So I'd like to make a special appeal to you. It's exceedingly difficult for me to enter into discussions of Soviets with legislative restrictions applying to the very areas that are on negotiations with them. I ask you not to tie my hands or under mine, my negotiating position. Each of you are key to any chance we have of proceeding of the united government. And I appreciate very much your efforts and your success. If you will give me your trust and confidence, I pledge to you I won't give anything away or I won't let you down. Now I'm going to ask George if you comment on the meeting tonight. President, I'll stand if I may. So I can see it. I'm so happy to see you. I'm going to stick with President. I wouldn't want to stuck up. Thank you. President, it's so nice to see you again. Good to see you. I'm proud that you're going to sign it. I know. And it's present. Great. President, we've got some flowers and we're going to go to St. Paul's Association. So I have a bean porcelain rose collection for you as well. I understand that. Maybe we'll take place over there after we sign. I'll follow from Texas. See you. Mr. President, how are you? Just fine. Nice to meet you. Long time since I've been President, too. Mr. President, I'm going to sign it. Can you take that? It's so nice to meet you. Pleasure to meet you. Mr. President, they've been here. Also, those who are going to come. Those who are going to come. Nice to see you. Mr. President, how are you? I'm so excited. I'm going to sign it. Thank you very much. You're welcome. I'm glad that you're here. Mr. President, how are you? I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. Thank you so much. We have a beautiful gift from Helen Bean, to add to your bean collection at the bottom. And now that you have all the berries, you can start having the roses. Well, that's beautiful. I'm a great fan of the Bean artwork, and I have not seen this. It's beautiful. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Well, thank you very much. I did this right in my name. From your fellow California and all the people in Pasadena, we'd like to give you these roses, and congratulate you and all of the American people on a great new national flag. Thank you very much. I used to lose a kind for several years there, and I used to lunch once each every year with the Tournament Roses Queen Hatter's Court, because I was broadcasting the Rose Parade. That's right. I've been standing to those who don't know about that Rose Parade. You can set your clock by the program, and what's going on. I've never seen anything that could be right to the minute. What float will be going by, and that's exactly when it comes by. That's right. Well, this is all beautiful. Thank you very much. Thank you. You're the best thing in the world. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you very much. You're welcome. Thank you. I'm very much grateful. Thank you very much. Thank you again very much. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. I was an extra. I lost my brain in two weeks. Thank you very much.


Hi everyone, my name is Victor Wu. I'm a product manager at GitLab. Today, I wanted to show you a new feature It's called scoped labels. So what you see on the screen right now is a bunch of labels on this labels screen And you can see that there's a scoping for these purple labels It says platform double colon Android, Ubuntu, Windows and so forth and then same with state with these blue labels So you can already see what I mean by scoped labels is that there's a scope and then there's a value So all these belong to the same scope because they share platform double colon not because they're the same color I could actually use different colors, but the scoping will recognize The the word platform, but I'm getting ahead of myself Let me show you how to use scope labels before coming back to talk about how you manage and create scoped labels So one way to use scope labels that is very interesting is you can use them as effectively like custom fields So again going back to this This example here with the purple scoped labels. This is essentially a custom field That say you wanted to assign any number of issues merge requests for you in epics to say that you associate with them a Custom field that says identify it as what operating system or what platform So what you can do here is that say this particular feature that you're working on represented by this issue You wanted to say that it belongs to iOS and so what you can do is you can assign that to iOS and then Right away it gets that label and it does exactly what you would expect it to do And then you see the nice system note here as well, and it also even says as you know scoped label Now say now I'm looking at this issue and now I've decided that oh, I actually added the wrong label Or it's actually not iOS. It's actually Android. I put in the wrong custom field as a work what I could do now is actually click Android and What happens is that now Android the Android labels apply platform to record Android and iOS is automatically removed So that's precisely how scoped labels work Given this object this issue. It can only contain One scoped label of that given scope namely platform colon to be more specific the correct logic is is is Put into place when you actually apply the label that's when the logic is adhered to but in any case you can see how this You've been able to use this platform double colon as a custom field So say you have any if you have any use of a custom field with an enumerated number of options This is a great way to use this feature another way to use Scoped labels and now that you understand that they're essentially mutually exclusive labels is for workflow states And so you can see these states, you know development review production Ready represent workflow states, so I've already set up a board here and so you can see Here you have these workflow states represented up top in this agile workflow board So if you've been using gilab for a while, this should seem familiar and some of you might even use State colon something and we purposely chose double colon because we looked at our user data And we found out that double colon is not being used very much. So we thought that would be a good way to release this feature For for something that's not being used or that the title in particular delay title But anyways back to the feature So how you could use this is exactly as you've been using issue boards before you can drag this issue over one at a time As you see so at first this doesn't seem like it's anything new and Indeed, there's nothing new with this particular view You're able to judge issues one over the other in this workflow board But what's really super relevant is when I actually go on to the issue itself and you can see that it went into development and then went into ready and then went into review and What's important is that when it went into these stages gilab automatically removed the previous Stage so prior to this feature if you wanted to use labels to represent states in a workflow It would work very well in this case because when you drag an issue from one state to another state The previous labels removed in the new labels added But if you try to do the same thing here, you would have to do it in two steps You would have to add the new label and then remove the previous label and some of our users were saying that that's very cumbersome It's not very intuitive but now what you can do is if you're in this issue and you're not looking at the workflow board So maybe you're a developer Maybe you're a QA engineer and you're not looking at the workflow board all the time But you're just looking at one particular issue and you want to change the state advance the state If you want to go to review all the way to production you can do that And once you put it into production It automatically removes the review state for you as you see the the system note right here And so there's no confusion. There is only one mutually exclusive Workflow state I'd use as you set it up So how do you create these workflow? Labels are Steve's I started these scoped labels in the first place and what we've done in good lab to design This feature is something we think that's very interesting and to make it very very simple We haven't added any additional menus or additional UI to make it complicated. All we've done actually is just Asked our users yourself as if you're watching this video just include the double colon by including the double colon a Label becomes a scoped label. That's all that happens. That's all that's required So once you click edit here So pretending I'm creating this label for the first time and I added this double colon And there's this nice new little help Text telling you about that This will automatically become a scope label. So the moment I remove the double colon and do say like a dash It's no longer a scope label. So I click save and I go back and you can see this little helpful question mark Is not there anymore Indicating that it's not a scoped label. So I'm going to go back click edit Changing back double colon and now it's a scope label. So that's all I did I didn't have to click any checkbox or anything. You know that recognizes. It's a scoped label simply by the double colon So that's really all that there is to scope labels. It's it's really simple and we really like it So this feature is available On the premium tier. So that is For self-managed instances of GitLab and for GitLab comm which I'm showing you right now It's available for silver and above. So if you're using gilab comm this feature is already available And if you have a group on gilab comm with a silver subscription or a gold Subscription and you create any labels in that particular group or in the subgroups or projects of that, you know group hierarchy Then you will have access to this of functionality if you're not in one of those tiers and you use the double colon syntax GitLab will just ignore it. It will just be used treated as a single as a Non-scoped label a regular label. So again, if you're on gilab comm It will be available for silver and gold subscription for self-hosted instances This will be available for the premium tier and the ultimate tier And this feature will be made available In October 22nd. So that's 11 days out in GitLab 11.10 And again, that's on April 22nd for self-hosted instances, but if you're using gilab comm it's already available Thanks for watching


This study seeks to determine whether hyperhydration can reduce morbidity associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome, HUS, in children with shiga toxin producing escharichocoli, STEC, infection. The study will compare two different approaches for treating the condition, hyperhydration and conservative fluid management. The goal is to determine which approach is more effective at reducing the severity of HUS symptoms. This article was offered by Steven B. Friedman, David Schnadauer, Micah Estes, and others.