Welcome to another video back in glorious Cornwall. I got down here at about 20 past 5 It's a beautifully still morning. I'm down here just waiting for My mate John from the fish locker. So we'll wait for John Then we'll load the boat up and get out into a big blue. I'm excited Beautiful sunrise there, and I'm just ogling Sun white rise while Mr. Fish locker does all work look yeah Here he is. What was in this thing? He says I didn't have a look and he also said you could smell it through the lid, so I Don't know about this Breath-old, but I'm not screwing it. I'm not going in there. What is it man? I can smell it. What is it? Right all aboard. What do you have to say? Ready yeah Wow Hey, oh big swan see if we can get him on camera look Big swan catching cook John says visibility looks okay, and I'm like well I'll just cut to a clip of what I've been dealing with of late So we're gonna get suited and booted and And just have a little look to see what we can see if we can find a crab or lobster Not keen on shooting anything I'm just not keen on shooting anything and dealing with it when I can't cook it If I get a if I get a decent bass, I'll take that home with me I had just like optimistic you are that you're gonna find a big bus It's not it's not good to be optimistic. It's not just as easy as that is it We Right see bedding we're in about 15 feet of visibility 15 feet of is that's brilliant For those of the year that don't know which you probably will do I'm out with John From the fish locker, which is a very popular fishing channel on YouTube go check him out obviously links below And he's gonna take me down. We're gonna see what we can see what we can rustle out at little holes and stuff But we on we what we on for what are you thinking we're gonna get? He's just a foot crack and I'm the crack. Oh, yeah, because we down doing a bit of patio work for John We're building his patio at moment And that's a finished Just done a Indian stone in a random pattern. You see none of the corners meet and None of the joint gaps are too long We've got some oak sleepers as a retainer a little step up with some golden gravel there and then Good he says good and I've done a little thing here for James James put his hand prints in there I took a couple of scallop shells in there just to So you under no illusions who's patio it is And that's a job done So this was the best day to come out for a dive. So that's what we're doing. So we're down tools We're down tools and yeah, yeah, right. Let's get suited and booted right. We're suited. We're booted And we're off in soup We're out at water John's done excellent. Oh look at all them. Look healthy ecosystem. Unfortunately, them lads are pretty much bottom at food chain Well, unless I jump in water, then I automatically come become bottom at food chain around these parts. I'm not very good at it And right, we'll just run through what I did first. I jumped in went to load misspear gun and it shat it So no speargun fight about with my GoPro getting it off misspear gun onto me noggin For the first time I've had it on me proper like a headband and that went really well Aka there's a GoPro 8 on bottom at sea the main man has had a little bit of success So let's have a little look what you get between us.  Yeah, we kept the biggest one John got one and brought it back to But but it won't up to one up to size was it first one? I found was size, but wasn't as big as this so all I've just kept doing was Every time I found a bigger one. I'd come back Put the big one in the boat and let the little one go and we'll bend you up. Okay, that look it's a little look at it And there we go Paul managed to kind of save his blank One of this out of a Ridley Scott film that just look at that man So this is a spider crab for anyone who doesn't know You get you don't sit don't get me. We'll have to look after each other here This is the trust game There's no real way of holding these without them causing you some type of damage because the backs are spiky as Eleanor So that's pretty big in it. There you go. Look here So that's spider was that look cornish king crab cornish king crab. See you later. So what's planned now then captain? Get changed go fishing get changed go fishing sounds like a plan This is officially fishing I'm gonna start doing something a minute gaffas told me thing is out here is gaffa put me next to a patio Then I'm gaffa, but out here He calls shots no part-time fisherman here. There's no part-time fisherman here. There's no laborer. We just get on with it I'll have that single one then shall I Hey, I tried thank you. There you go No, you just press play It just press record so you can teach me on here. So I look like a muppet It Tune in tomorrow and we'll record me teaching him how to do mixes up. It's cement mixer. Easy life. Do you get up and down? Easy life Fish on Look what you've called I love the unknowing like oh, it's called it. Look Not happy about it here. Is it a ballon wrath?  Just to keep it away from its area. Yeah. There you go. Look Keep winding lad Oh, I've lost one of them. All right, we'll get them swung in then There we are There you go Two of you. Thanks very much. Two of your finest English well Cornish Sandals I'm just going to wrestle with these and dispatch them. No, I'm not gonna dispatch them. Put them in a big bucket. How many miles off? Shorty think we are We're a million miles away from home. We're scared Hungry we thirsty We're worried Got out to a wreck just to know first drift over the top of it Paul's doing his very best to bring in a fish And he's doing a really good job at making it look hard. Oi I'm right Make a video of me doing tapioca tomorrow All that old skills bigger than that sandal. It's your PB fish I've got colour That man's the link Link the merciless Got a photo of you with your PB link Tiny though, isn't it? The fishing community are laughing me with that. Well, didn't want to be the only one that you catch today, so We'll get a photo of it and see. Can't put it back. We're back at the marina. We had the The weather turned on us and sea was choppy as so we've come in and grabbed some food Do a bit more patio work. I live to fight another day We'll be back can't finish this trip without catching summer half decent Well, I've got some kids What am I saying? What is it? I'll leave that in I'll leave that in what am I chatting?  Probably I'm probably right. He's probably right Right, I'm chatting guff to my lads though You all know what you've been with me for long enough to know that it's all real talk And we're going to be back down here pulling out some monsters in the next couple of days Trying this on my phone because I don't have my camera We're back down. I'm just going to try and find my GoPro that I lost the other day There's been a couple of days, but I'm hoping it's That hadn't been too much of a swell recording Just getting a quick video of John's ass through the looking glass there There he is, but I'm just going to try and find it while John scoops about looking for some lobsters Lovely day Let's switch to GoPro because John's kindly so yeah, so I'm out with one of his How many days was that under there six hours after 36 hours? Look at that Still got battery on it Yeah, that's it. Oh, so happy to get that back. Let me go bro sun's going down and I got a lobster So that's just bang on in it and um for those of you Oh Well the camera's still Right on bingo wing Really hurt me Oh Well, there you go. That's gonna scar. That's gonna bleed. I'm bleeding. I'm medic I wish I'd recorded that I really hurt like Right, so that's the first Nipped by a lobster on bingo wing. Hold on Let me get me composure because I was gonna say something there before that happened. Did she just grab me or did you do that on purpose? I'll uh, what I'll do is I'll overlay a little photo of the damage that that's done now see Yeah, go check that video and go see Go check out the notching system that he does on there because it's all about sustainability and and go check out The size of them lobsters In fact, you shouldn't even subscribe to me. Actually don't bother. Don't bother Right here we go again Early doors five o'clock morning Cut that And we're off off out to sea Here we are look early morning.   Bigger than that get away One I am blanked unlike John fortunately look He's calling it pollock It's a nice pollock apparently Good eating size. Wow Look at that beautiful The pink lure doing its thing look at that man. How much you reckon that weighs about five or six six Right here we go whip be bringing it back come on lad There's a bit of a bend on rod, but it's because he's got a little tiny rod on him. That's what they say What are you calling it a pollock? Oh, it is a pollock a little bit smaller than Chris's Yeah, let's have a look at it You've got anything to say about because I mean don't forget that people on my channel don't see much fish because I'm a Shite fisherman I don't catch much So nothing much to say This one has been in the water a little bit A bit of scars on the side. You can see these have been living in the kelp By home mottling the yard down the sides of there.  What is it?  That's why that's why the fish are being difficult to catch Because there's that much bait fish around I'm just spoilt for choice I got a ghillie suit on I got a spider Ed Brown and a lobster all under size Right, we're suited and booted now and we're John Chris and Callum are on that boat. We're on this boat and we're going to go and see if we can get some Some Piscatorial delights After a successful scallop braid We had to dive back down to see if I could see any bass I had a little swim around hung around under the kelp Tried rubbing my bands. That's not euphemism To make a little bit of noise did a bit of grunting. That sometimes lures the curious fish in All the stroking for no reward As you can see here, there was a school, but They were just a little bit too small. I didn't want to take a pot shot I had a look around on the sand to see if I could find any flatfish But to no avail. I'm happy with the scallops. There's Chris and Callum John we've had our first little foray That's the other thing on my film. I grabbed a couple but Scallops, do you have a little? That is actually a hairy one That's actually a hairy, a bearded Look at that, a bearded scholar No, not after yesterday's debacle Just done the scallops in garlic butter and boiled the lobster Just so you know that nothing's going to waste. It's all getting eaten And this is the lemon. It took me a while to get this out of from under the rock But one big breath hold and and I managed to get it out of there Tea time Right, we've done with diving We've come to lift one of a hall One of John's pots It's been out here a while Salty sea dogs now have been out here for a while Three days for three days. Yeah Let's have a look It's just crabs It might be a keeper Can't hear me saying Don't you dare Don't you dare Hey just No Not with him If that gets on your toe you've absolutely done for Can that bruise her man I get pcsd now when John holds anything with claws around near me Hey Steven seagull Whenever you're doing this and you put it on the side The main thing is to make sure to keep your feet flat on the deck So you don't get any rubs on your ankles It's how deep is it here It is 46 feet And that's litter So Look at him He's just following boat because he's seen our our pollock Get knotted lad Heron bull Don't blame him though it looks tasty Is it? Do you need me to dive down?   A couple more edibles Two small to keep off Yeah that we can just tell Three mil Yeah Where she goes How white that is See the top of his shoulders carried him Yeah Still soft Yeah She's peeled She's peeled In he goes In there before That's the skull The skull of a ling Is it a ling? It's where the teeth were Yeah It's where teeth were Dragon skull is Yeah that's good Now we're there, we're there Will it stink? It's sniffing it Too bad It's warning me Yeah I'm going to keep this ling skull To put when we're resting my skulls I think Piece of vertebra I don't want that Can have that Bit of vertebra Do I want this ling skull Let me have a think Does it stink? I can't tell whether I stink or it stinks Or if you don't stink Why the power of ling skull? The power of ling skull Ling in the merciless Does it stink mate? It does stink, doesn't it? That's good one That's too small that Does it smell, do you think? Does a bit, doesn't it?  Ling it back to The gullies love it They're not that deaf to have a look at Yeah There it is You can't always That's a big one Do occasionally catch big fish It does like Tune into the Fish Locker YouTube channel If you want to see him catching these big fish Link below I can't wait to see that video Where you put a good line up I might not put it in Because I did make a meal of it A meal heskey of it, didn't I? The noises that were coming out here I expected there to be like a mortal wound To be fair, I thought it was going to be like One of them real bruise at least There was nails, there was niche So I was going to bait them up again It's an ongoing thing So that's all the Pollock used He's filleted it off to take home And then the rest of it goes in pot Goes over and then hopefully Catches something else in there So even the waist you can turn it into a lobster, okay? Yeah, it's brilliant Nothing goes to waste The holistic approach Being at sea And then grafting But grafting has taken a bit longer than expected With weather and fishing breaks But I have been looked after By the Fish Locker family Have very, very much so looked after me So point where I was even having a nice sundae lunch With John's father-in-law and mother-in-law A lovely pork dinner Cooked by Hannah Which was a joy to be a part of So grateful for that And as I said before And I've said many times Go and follow John on YouTube And Instagram And John's homemade pavlova Oh yeah Yeah, John's mother-in-law Knocked up some homemade pavlova And it was just delicious So to get cookful like that It's worth the trip It's worth the trip of lunch for that pavlova If you're watching John's mother-in-law Right, we'll see you next time It'll probably I'll be back down the Cornwall Maybe in a few months Maybe in a month, who knows? But I will be down here again But for now We'll catch you later See you See you later See you later


What's up everybody? JC and for jazby's case breaks.com. We filled up 2021 Canadian National Treasures Baseball 4-Boss case break picker teams number three. Brand new release today on this Friday November 12th So we did do another random number block Here's the customers that originally bought in. Thank you guys, and then we had a random number block for those teams there It'd be the Angel Dodgers, Mariners, Blue Jays, A's and Rockies, and there's the customers that have a piece of those teams Here we go And another case down of NT picker team number four guys is in single digits as well. I believe at eight left Again by the time I get done with this break if it is not sold out will random number block their remaining teams And we'll get that next pick your team rolling and again guys. This has been some fun stuff some good stuff as well First one is Nick Madrigal tonight, and I Nick Madrigal We have 18 out of 25 That is Cody Bellinger and Madrigal was Chicago White Sox, right? Or wait, let me make sure it shows blue outline. They could have updated it I know he's been I know he's been traded to the Cubs, right? Let's make sure Yes, Nick Madrigal now is under the Cubs So it's Jersey still gonna be Chicago a White Sox, of course But if you go look at his cards on the checklist You'll notice that it's all Cubs pretty much Show you guys right here too as well So the colossal material Chicago Cubs to 99 This one though the six-pack material signatures for some reason that one says Chicago White Sox But everything else has been Cubs pretty much or actually it's both This one says White Sox, but the colossal material is Chicago Cubs though So just looking out guys just just let you guys know you just got to go by the checklist, of course And this is officially coming from Panini. So colossal which is right here colossal materials That one shows Chicago Cubs So we'll be giving that to the Cubs. So that'll go to Noah I'll put a little note on it Which sometimes with Panini they'll also like make it seem like so like it notice that it's black But then it's like blue Cubs blue You know and then Dodgers for sure is R&B 18 spot a going to Martin Next we got is Noah Cinegar for the Mets to 99 Joseph of the Mets Look at this patch Marcano 20 out of 25. Good man. Look at that. That is sweet. I just want to buy this card for the patch San Diego Padres going to Adam Harper That atom bomb look at that buddy What a patch we have Monte Harrison from Miami 75 out of 99 Mike with the Marlins and we have number to 10 Andy Young for the Arizona Diamondbacks 7 out of 10 Brandon bought the deep acts right before I put them in an R&B very nice key Brian Hayes RPA 1099 79 out of 99 Pirates going to Logan Logan's having a long work shift today He'll be happy to watch these replays of these videos right Logan And we have legendary silhouette dual booklets Stan Musa and red show and diced 15 of 15 so that'll be st. Louis for both I'll say showing dice and sometimes some people say showing Deist both for st. Louis going to Martin first box in the books next one Kyle Tucker for Houston 40 out of 99 and Three out of ten for Baltimore Martin that is Cal Ripken, Jr. No, I said that a Brandon took them before I put them in a random number block. They weren't part of the R&B No, it was just the blue. It was just the angels Dodgers Mariners Blue Jays A's Rockies Fernando Tatis Jr. 5 out of 25 Tatis Adam Harper. We got Chris Bubek For Kansas City, Kansas City going to Oliver And we got a Andreas Geminis for Venezuela for Cleveland to 99 Noah with the Cleveland Indians. Oh Yeah, you know why I was on there Adam is because the skew I've been leaving the skew the same as the first one But I'm just changing it to number three So if you look at the skew, you'll notice it says like angels Dodgers Mariners White Sox Blue Jays Rays Nationals Astros A's I just didn't change the skew this time. The only thing I changed about it The only thing I changed about it was the picker team number three is that all I should have deleted the rest of the teams But no, it's what's in the title Yeah, that's all it was More I'm going by the list. I mean I can double check for you, but I Looks like Logan has the pirates in numbers three and four, but let me check Yeah, Logan bought the pirates in three and four You have the Philadelphia Phillies though Martin. Yeah, I apologize on that. I'll change it for number four Dane Dunning for Texas 25 out of 25 25 out of 25 nice patch right there for Texas Texas Patrick Davis And we got Paul Molliter Milwaukee Six out of 25 Milwaukee Brewers going to Brian and we have jumbo material booklets Albert pool holes 38 out of 49 that is Dodgers edition of Albert pool holes LED that's part of the R&B 38 spot eight going to mark two boxes down two more to go So again guys next pick your team is in single digits down to eight or nine, I believe By the time I get done with this if we don't get that R&B sold out or if we don't get those teams sold out on R&B I'm up Number five is on the website as well fresh case on that A lot of teams are remaining but grab your team because they won't be there for long and Then it looks like we'll be doing some of peachy platinum after this, so I Figure we'll do some of peachy platinum that gives us enough time to sell the next R&B and then we'll work on Selling on maybe more platinum maybe sell out that pack filler that sounds like contenders football. That's really close now, too Just that one pack filler Ryan Mountcastle to 99 Colossal and Austin metals for Tampa Bay going to Jose Eddie Murray Hall of Fame materials another one for Baltimore Martin game gear Alex Rodriguez for Seattle part of the Mariners R&B 62 spot to go into Jake yeah, Martin you can double check your receipts, too But I mean there is times where we do make a mistake copy and paste the wrong name, but in this instance I check the Order numbers and it matches up a lovin We have Ramon Lariano 7 out of 25 Oakland Athletics that's part of the R&B seven Seven that is Adam Cumberman Jorge Soler Kansas City 28 out of 49. That's like a little acetate on top of the Jersey. That's pretty nice Kansas City Royals went Oliver. We have an RPA of Tariq 47 out of 49 that is a pitcher there for Detroit Chad B for the Tigers We have an Aussie albies for Atlanta six out of seven It's not like a St. Patrick's Day Jersey or something green Six out of seven for Atlanta. It's going to Matt L. I actually have to go quickly run and get some 180s, but we'll go with this Brooks Roberts and cut signature though 18 out of 25 Look at that very nice. I'm quickly running get some 180s. I don't think I have enough here For this all right guys box and T You can't pick it you number four is in the store. Let's get that going the thick card as well Big card guys big car big car. Whoa. We got a printing plate one of one at the top another something Something else is hiding in here more one of ones potentially First one one of one Randy Arosa Rania That's a St. Louis Cardinals Jersey, but Tampa Bay Ray Randy Arosa Rania There you go TB It's going to Jose We got a patch here nine out of ten Randy Johnson for Arizona Brandon with Arizona. We got game gear number 299 for Houston Jeff Bagwell Pinstripe in there as well Noah with that one. We have a Bobby door For Boston, look at that old Jersey right there. It's crazy 9 out of 25 Hall of Fame materials Boston It's going to Christopher. We have a redemption Wow treasured materials signatures gold bow Jackson Oliver you might have just hit a bow bow nose Come on bow Jackson You got time to do some signatures treasured material signatures Gold Would be at a 25 or less, so I'm thinking maybe out of 10 because His normal base is out of 25, so I assume it's got to be less than that So very nice man, hollow gold and that's a Kansas City Royal going to Oliver. We got a midnight autograph of Ben Zobrist for Chicago seven out of ten Chicago Cubs is going to know a Davis Esteban Florio nice three-color patch and autograph 17 out of 49 for the Yankees Noah Davis. You have a Tony Perez Yes Tony Perez and that should be what Cincinnati Tony Perez that is signature set is it? Yeah, Cincinnati Reds Well, there's retro or signature set. It is Cincinnati So they go Cincinnati Reds going to Dennis and Last but not least we got a booklet coming up And it is tonighty-nine jumble materials Dalton Jeffries bone for Oakland 43 Oakland is spot three Chad last spot mojo with their hit right there Very nice Chad So there you go guys That was the break another break of NT in the books And I don't think we have to do any randomizers that I know of I don't think so shock me Think everything there potentially there was supposed to be one, but I guess ended up being the same team In the earlier boxer here like this one Both for St. Louis A very nice RPA's keep Ryan Hays was a nice one and a young that patch right there All in all very nice break right here guys Appreciate it. This is break number three now if you want to look forward to number four That is our last bigger team that is in single digits, and we are at eight left now grab your teams now while you can guys When I go through orders right now start the next break I'm gonna R&B at the last eight teams there and again fresh case picker team number five is on the website We're already at 22 guys, so we'll probably most likely get another one done. Appreciate it guys Jasper's case breaks calm


Today, let us remember the ultimate sacrifice of the 14 firefighters we are here to honor, and in order to move forward, we must look back and honor those who have fallen. Let us also pay our respects to the fallen and their families by renewing our commitment to each other, to work tirelessly to ensure that workers in British Columbia return home safely to their families at the end of the day. Please accept our deep gratitude and know that we share your loss.


I love anything that goes fast, whether it be a fast car, a fighter jet, a speedboat, anything that just gets the heart to racing. My name is Nikolas Rojowski and I'm an engineer here at Rogue Australia. So I started off my educational career at RMIT in an advanced diploma of Aerospace Engineering and then after that two year course I jumped straight into 30 of the bachelor degree. I'm very fortunate that I got to work in a job position that is as closely related to what I was doing in the academic side with the laser additive deposition. It's a very very niche market. The most exciting part is getting to work with the laser because it's a four kilowatt laser and it can burn a hole through pretty much anything. What we can achieve with it is pretty impressive parts that would have been retired from service because they've got a nasty chunk missing. We can then rebuild that certified and release it and it goes back and flies again. I'm very very proud. Nik has achieved significant outcome not only in the delivery of the application solutions but the delivery of the technology to a much broader base. He has presented at a number of conferences and again it highlights that through Nik's endeavours we are world leaders in laser application. Working for a multinational company like RUAC is very beneficial. I'm adjured by self-satisfaction at knowing that I've achieved something and working hard and continuing to achieve what we're pushing for here.


The learning curve for new sailors can be steep, especially for their first deployment, and will lay the foundation for the rest of their careers. Petty Officer Michael Sanchez is going to tell us about a new sailor aboard USS Germantown. For sailors new to the fleet, their first underway is a learning experience full of new environments and responsibilities. As seaman Mark Cabrera aboard USS Germantown reflects upon his time at sea, he looks forward to being piercide and the tasks at hand. I love seeing the helos coming, love going out, running and chocking chaining them. We're about to start the preservation on the well deck after a long deployment as you can see the rust builds up. Work is necessary because it keeps the ship going. Once the bulkheads go, then you don't really have a ship to go with. From operations underway to preservation in port, junior sailors like Cabrera are a vital part of the success of USS Germantown and the United States Navy. Petty Officer Michael Sanchez, Fleet Activity Saucerbow, Japan.


We will start this morning with general questions, and our first question is from Mark MacDonald. To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to ensure that children with complex needs and medical conditions are appropriately supported in their education. John Swinney We want all children and young people to be able to make the most of their educational opportunities. Education authorities have duties under the additional support for learning 2001 counted to identify, provide for, and review the additional support needs of all its pupils. That includes ensuring that there is appropriate resources in place to the support pupils in their learning. That is supplemented by specific guidance on meeting the healthcare needs of pupils while they are attending schools and supporting children who are unable to attend schools due to ill health. Mark MacDonald Thank you, the cabinet secretary. The prevalence of children with life-limiting conditions in Scotland is increasing and byddai'n gwybod nhw, ac mae'n meddwl arwyf yn gweithio'r wathun o'r meddwl. Felly, mae'n gweithio'r newidau sydd gyda'r cyffredinol yn cael y byddai'n gyffredinol sydd yn cael y byddai'r cyffredinol, felly mae'n gweithio'r gweld ffawr o'r staff yn gallu gweld o'r hefyd i'r newidau yn cyfgareddol i'w meddwl i'r cyffredinol. Felly, wrth fynd i'r gweld o'r meddwl i'u cyffredinol, mae'n credu i'r cyffredinol maen nhw'n credu yn ffutur? Is the cabinet secretary willing to explore whether more specific guidance may be required and would he be willing to meet with me to discuss this further? Cabinet secretary? I am very happy to explore that issue further. It is a very specialist set of circumstances that I understand. I have visited a number of educational facilities that are providing support to young people who require feeding through a tube of the complexities and the challenges that that presents. In a mainstream school environment, that could be a particularly acute challenge. I am very happy to meet Mr MacDonald and to hear his views on how we might have more focused guidance that might help education practitioners in that respect. Clare Adamson Thank you. The cabinet secretary will be aware of press reports regarding inappropriate restraint at Clyde View School in my constituency. Can I have assurance from the cabinet secretary that concerns regarding restraint, as highlighted by the Children's Commissioner of Bruce Adamson, in the report for restraint and seclusion in Scotland's schools, are being addressed? Cabinet secretary? I am aware of the reports to which Clare Adamson refers. Those are issues that have been drawn to the attention of North Lancer Council, which I would say have been very open in supplying information to the Government in that respect. North Lancer Council are investigating this incident and it is also the subject of a Police Scotland investigation, so it would be inappropriate for me to comment any further on the circumstances of the Clyde View case. In general, however, I would say that the Government's guidance on the use of restraint is absolutely crystal clear that the use of restraint should only ever be used as a last resort after all other interventions have been exhausted and only in circumstances where the safety of members of staff or the child concerned would be supported as a consequence of restraint. However, I stress that that is only in the most limited set of circumstances when all other avenues of positive intervention have been exhausted. 2. Ross Greer To ask the Scottish Government, in light of further delays in reopening Hunterston nuclear power station, what discussions it has had with the Office for Nuclear Regulation to ensure that it will not be allowed to reopen unless safety standards are met? I met with senior representatives from the Office for Nuclear Regulation, O&R, on 21 February 2019. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the current situation at Hunterston B and the processes that O&R will use to make a decision regarding a possible restart of the reactors. Although the O&R is not directly accountable to Scottish ministers, the O&R representative has provided assurance that it is willing only to allow for the reactors to restart if it is satisfied that it is safe to do so and that it is functioning in an independent and transparent manner. 2. Ross Greer I thank that minister for that answer. As he will be aware, there are 370 cracks in the reactor core at Hunterston B. That is a significant safety concern for the community and for workers. That is a nuclear power plant that has been repeatedly closed due to safety concerns. Its reopening has been repeatedly delayed. Regardless of all that, it is one whose lifespan will not go beyond 2023. For the workers in the community, that is a huge concern. Will the minister and the Scottish Government commit to ensuring that there is a just transition for every single worker that is currently employed or connected to nuclear power at Hunterston? 3. Ross Greer Certainly, in regards to Ross Greer's question, I can just clarify that the checks have found 100 cracks, but there is an estimate that there are 370s. We do not know precisely how many cracks there are in the reactor, and that is just a point of fact to put across. It is worth stating that, clearly, as I said in my original answer, the future of the reactors themselves are a matter for the O&R to engage on with EDF, the operator. Of course, we are not directly accountable to the Scottish Parliament or the Scottish Government on those matters. We have an interest in the wellbeing of the community in North Ayrshire. Obviously, the plant employs many people in that community, and we will do everything that we can to support them, but I do not want to prejudge the outcome of the exercise. We have to let the O&R do its work and I trust its judgment on the matter, but it has given us every assurance that health and safety is our primary concern. Of course, we will help if there is any implications for the plant itself. 4. Kenneth Gibson Does the minister agree that Hunterston B operates within stringent safety limits and that EDF is regularly in contact with the Office for Nuclear Regulation, regarding graphite cracks and other safety-related matters? Having visited Hunterston B last week and spoken to EDF, it is clear that safety is an absolute overriding concern of all who work there. Their own lives and those of their families living in nearby communities depends on it. 5. Kenneth Gibson I certainly agree with Kenneth Gibson in respect of the workforce. I have to say that public safety is obviously the Scottish Government's absolute priority, and our position on the future of nuclear energy is well known that we are not minded to support that. From the interaction I and my officials have had with the Office for Nuclear Regulation themselves and the DDS staff at Hunterston B as the plant, it is clear that health and safety is absolutely their priority. It is worth stating also at the O&R when I did meet them that we are keen to stress that, in their view, the workforce at Hunterston is one of the best they have ever come across in terms of the quality of the work that they do, and they have absolutely no concerns about their skills or abilities. If there are problems at Hunterston B, it is around the technology itself, not the workforce. 3. Michelle Ballantyne To ask the cabinet secretary what the Scottish Government's position is regarding whether schools should have a zero tolerance policy towards violent behaviour. Cabinet Secretary John Swinney Because of the violence towards anyone, it is unacceptable and the safety of our children, young people and staff at school is paramount. We and our partners across the education sector advocate in the approach for schools and local authorities to work with pupils on the underlying reasons behind inappropriate behaviour to enable them to re-engage with learning and personal development. We have published guidance for schools and local authorities that have a renewed focus on prevention, early intervention and response to individual need, in line with the principles of getting it right for every child. Michelle Ballantyne I have recently been contacted by a teacher who has 30 years experience and is currently working as a supply teacher who was hospitalised after a metal implement was thrown and damaged her eye. Violence in schools is causing teachers to think twice about their careers, and certainly we are struggling now when we learn at Christmas that over £60 million has now been spent to recruit supply teachers. Does the cabinet secretary recognise that violence in schools is deterring some teachers from pursuing their chosen profession? I want to assure Michelle Ballantyne that I take the issues of violence in schools extremely seriously, but I think that we have to look at the evidence on all of this. There are unacceptable incidents, but the overwhelming evidence that was demonstrated in the behaviour in Scottish schools 2016 report, published in December 2017, indicated that teachers find pupils generally well behaved and that violence towards teachers is very rare. We have to be very careful about the narrative that is painted about Scottish education. If there are unacceptable instances of violence, they will be dealt with, but the overwhelming behaviour of our young people is good in our schools. They are a credit to our country, and we should celebrate that whilst tackling unacceptable behaviour where it arises. That is undoubtedly the case. It certainly was my experience when I worked in schools. However, I have constituents who have approached me who work in our schools and who are assaulted by pupils on a daily basis, and I do not exaggerate that point. Can the cabinet secretary give us some advice about how people in that situation should deal with that violence? The first thing that I will say is that I am going to reiterate what I have just said to Michelle Ballantyne, that there are unacceptable instances of violence in our schools, and they must be tackled immediately by school leadership. However, overwhelmingly, the evidence demonstrates that teachers generally find pupils to be well behaved and that violence towards teachers is rare. Where there is unacceptable behaviour in my answer to Michelle Ballantyne a moment ago, I said that we should be tackling the underlying reasons for that behaviour. That should be as part of a programme of early intervention to address the behaviour of young people and to make sure that staff can come to their work safe and secure in the participation that they can undertake at their work, and that other pupils are safe into the bargain. That is the approach that should be taken in all schools in the country, and I am confident that that is the approach that is taken around the country. To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers that enough has been done to address workforce concerns regarding helicopter safety in the North Sea since the disaster 10 years ago this week. Minister Paul Wheelhouse, April 1 marks 10 years since the tragic Super Puma accident off the Peterhead coast with the loss of 16 lives. Our thoughts, I am sure those of colleagues in the chamber, are with all those who lost a loved one in that tragic event. A range of work has been undertaken by the Civil Aviation Authority, trade unions and industry, developing and implementing a range of safety measures since this tragedy, including workforce engagement review, led by all in gas UK, involving unions and industry. The CAE will also carry out a post-implementation review of its safety review of offshore helicopter operations, the CAP-1145, undertaken by an independent CAE team with engagement with key stakeholders, including trade unions. Lewis Macdonald Thank you very much. The minister will know that, since that disaster 10 years ago, another four offshore workers lost their lives off Shetland in 2013, and another 13 lives were lost in the Norwegian sector in 2016. The fatal accident inquiry on the Peterhead clash found that it was preventable, and at much the same time, the Transport Select Committee of the House of Commons acknowledged the case for an inquiry looking at the commercial pressures that affect helicopter operations. Given that the view of the offshore workforce, the trade unions and many families is very clear, will the Scottish Government not now get behind the calls for a full public inquiry before any more lives are lost offshore? The minister will certainly recognise the sincere concerns that Mr Macdonald has expressed. I know that he has a very strong and long-standing interest in safety in the oil and gas industry, so I very much respect his view on that, and I continue to engage with him on the matter. In terms of the issues around the commercial pressures that the member referred to, I just want to say that the issue of aviation safety is obviously one that is reserved to UK Government and Parliament under the Scotland Act, but we continue to engage very strongly with the regulators in terms of OGA in particular, and with all in gas UK and operators that are present in the oil and gas industry leadership group that I co-chair with Melford Campbell. We will continue to raise and prioritise the issue of health and safety in the industry, so it is not that we are ignoring the issue far from it, we are taking it very seriously. Obviously, the FEI that Mr Macdonald referred to has come forward with conclusions, but just to point out that measures are already being implemented around prohibiting helicopter flights in the most severe sea conditions, and I can write to the member about other steps that have been taken subsequently to the inquiry. Tavish Scott, to be followed by Liam Kerr. May I associate myself with Lewis Macdonald's sensible question and ask the minister to reflect that the sunbird crash that Lewis Macdonald mentioned has now six years past, and there still has not been a fatal accident inquiry. Would the minister at least undertake to speak with the Crown Office to press the case for that fatal accident inquiry to begin, given that the families of those who lost loved ones still have no answers to what actually happened? I very much recognise the strong interest of Mr Scott and Alistair Carmichael local MP as well in the role of an FEI. Investigations of deaths and decisions on fatal accident inquiries are, I am just sure that the member is aware, matters for the Lord Advocate acting independently. The Scottish Government is providing an additional £5 million in the Crown Office budget for 2019-20 to allow it to continue to increase staffing in response to increasingly complex caseload. I cannot intervene in the direct decision-making of the Lord Advocate, but we are making resources available to hold more fatal accident inquiries. Tavish Scott makes a good point. I think that what angers the colleagues and families of victims is that accident inquiries can take years, I think that one-third of fatal accident inquiries take over three years. In 2016, the inspectorate of prosecution made 12 recommendations to speed up and streamline accident inquiries. How many have been implemented of those recommendations? As the member may know, I appreciate that he was not in the previous session of Parliament, we moved fatal accident inquiry legislation, I was the minister responsible for taking that through the Parliament and we made a number of measures to improve the performance in terms of delivery of fatal accident inquiries, greater engagement with the families involved, which we recognised was a failing in the previous regime and also to make sure that there was a charter in place to try and improve performance. I happily reflect on the points that were made with justice colleagues and come back to them with any answers about steps that have been implemented since. Question 5, Gil Paterson. Many thanks, Presiding Officer. To ask the Scottish Government what recent meetings it has had with ScotRail and Network Rail regarding the efficiency of services using MoGuy station. Cabinet Secretary Michael Matheson. I last met the managing director of ScotRail Alliance, Alex Hines, in January, and I am expecting to meet him again on 24 April this year. We will discuss a range of issues, including ScotRail's performance across the network. My officials transport Scotland meeting a monthly basis with Network Rail and ScotRail to discuss performance issues and improvement initiatives. I thank the cabinet secretary for that answer. The cabinet secretary will be aware of the extremely poor record held by the performances of services to MoGuy, which were the worst-rated in Scotland. That and that works were progressed in order to make improvements. Can the cabinet secretary say if those works have been completed and what is the outcome? I can confirm the ScotRail Alliance's implementation of the recommendations from the Donovan report for MoGuy services. That has resulted in a significant improvement in right-time departures at MoGuy by 17.5 per cent. Recommendations include timetable changes, platform extension work and additional train and crew to allow departure services from MoGuy to depart on time. Those recommendations were delivered along with similar ones in the Strathclyde area, which has seen performance improvement in the wider Strathclyde network. I can also confirm to the member that more work is under way to implement further timetable changes to ensure that sustained improvement is achieved. The cabinet secretary might be aware of some calls that dualling the track between MoGuy station and Heinland might be a solution to improve some of the blockages in that line. Has the Government given any consideration to that as a viable or worthwhile concept? If so, could we outline next steps in a timescale for doing so? Network Rail is currently assessing what further actions it can take on the line to improve performance, and that includes looking at how it can enhance existing infrastructure arrangements on that particular line, and they will be reporting in due course on that issue. Thank you, Presiding Officer, to ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with NHS Ayrshire and Arran and South Ayrshire Council regarding the reported shortage of funded packages of care in South Ayrshire. Officials are engaging with senior officers in South Ayrshire regarding local plans to address current difficulties in the provision of appropriate care. That includes the partnership's longer-term plans for service redesign and our part of our joint work with all three integration joint boards in partnership with NHS Ayrshire and Arran on making the best use of the totality of their budgets to shift the balance of care into community settings. I thank the cabinet secretary for her answer, but she will be aware that NHS Ayrshire and Arran is expected to have a £20 million deficit or thereby this year, while South Ayrshire Council has already overspent their social care budget for this year as well. What advice and help can the Scottish Government give to the two organisations that, between them, are sustaining around 60 people in a hospital environment when people are ready and waiting to be discharged into the community? Of course. I am sure that Mr Scott appreciates and knows that there are many reasons for delayed discharge, some of which may be what are called code 9 reasons that are to do with powers of attorney and guardianship and can take quite a long time, some of which are in fact to do with the patient's own requirements, but even so I take very seriously delayed discharge, which is there because care in the community is not available or not appropriate to the individual needs. He will of course also be aware of the significant increase in the baseline budgets to health boards, thanks to our budget passed not that long ago, of the brokerage arrangements that I have made as part of our medium-term financial planning framework, which also allows our NHS boards the flexibility of a three-year planning framework, and of the additional £160 million that has gone from the health budget to health and social care partnerships through local authorities in order to provide additional care. All of that said, we are actively engaging with COSLA, which is a very important partnership in this matter, with individual health and social care partnerships to help them to understand the totality of the funding arrangements that are there. The point of integration is not to worry about whose particular budget something comes from, but to make sure that the care is provided that people need. We are individually working with areas that have particular difficulties, including South Ayrshire, where significant redesign and improvement of care at home and social care packages is required to bring them to a comparable footing of their colleagues elsewhere in Ayrshire and elsewhere in Scotland.


So with my relentless dedication to finishing on the time indicated on the agenda I just wanted to say a couple things First of all, thank you to our speakers To our moderators to the Institute for Health Policy team and the Center for Total Health team for a great event Thank you to everyone who is in the room for your participation your your active learning here And I would also point out and if you can cue the the slides here Our colleague Megan back in Oakland was pulling down some of the tweets. There was a very active discussion Going on online and I think those of you who are participating there and if you weren't live I think you can still not violate the rules of social media by going on now and reading it and tweeting and Before too long today's sessions will be available on our website and you'll be you'll be notified of that So I'll just stop there. I think it was a great day. I appreciate it, Tony If I could have duplicated your soliloquy there, I would have done so earlier, but that was wonderful So and thank you to this panel again for for Keeping the energy alive right at the very end of the day. We really appreciate it. So thank you all and Happy holidays


That's a proper way to make a good team mom Hey guys, this is my review for Bodyguard a series that got released on Netflix just recently. It actually isn't a Netflix show It was made for BBC first it was aired in BBC in the UK and then it came on to American audiences for Netflix and this is a very good show After watching the absolute abysmal second season of The Punisher This was a very very good refresher in terms of good Television-making the show follows a former veteran David Budd who it becomes employed as a special security Service or chief security for the home secretary. What follows is this why conspiracy involving the home secretary The secret security services as well as other members of government and it just explodes into this giant conspiracy of crime terrorism and fear and I will say This is actually a very good show and it's very reminiscent of MI5 or spooks My dad introduced me to that show a while back and I love the first couple of seasons I immediately watched it up to the eighth season and then I just I stopped I couldn't watch it anymore It just got really bad But I really did enjoy that show and is cool because one of the main actresses in the first few the first few seasons Is the home secretary in this show and I really got into this show immediately the show starts off with an absolute gripping scene at the very beginning on the train It's a 22 minute segment and it is intense not just in how well It's acted and how well it's written but how well it's shot in the music too This is constant music throughout the whole show and it's a very good soundtrack It's an underlying soundtrack when it helps build the tension into all these scenes each episode Has effectively I would say a hold your breath scene And admittedly some are not as good as others I would say there really isn't one in the fifth episode the kind of is one but each episode aside from that has a Moment and it is so good to watch especially because of how well it shot the cinematographer on the show is John Lee And I swear I thought I was watching Wally Fister's work Especially certain shots in this film remind me so much of the cinematography from the dark night and the dark night rises And it was really cool to watch all of these scenes be shot so well It is a well-written show no doubt but to add that extra layer of dedication in terms of Delivering it in a very sleek and a very gripping visual manner Really helps build the tension and builds the drama with this show and the acting is actually pretty darn good There's a lot of deception and mystery with each character Richard Madden is great as the lead as David But he actually does bring a lot of emotionality to this character We've seen a lot of veterans suffering from PTSD stories done over and over again in multiple versions of media, but he Still is able to add a little bit of a nuance element to it And then everyone else in this you can't trust anyone on this show. It's very cool. There's a lot of twists There's a lot of turns and I was thoroughly enthralled with this show From all of its elements the only thing I will say is that the fifth episode is a little lacking It's not exactly the most Rememorable episode it's building up to the sixth episode and the ending is cool Like when everything is on the table and you figure out what everything is It's a cool idea. It comes off a little cheesy, but I would still say it definitely took me for a loop I'd also have to say that the previously on bodyguard segments for each episode Is some of the best previously on segments I've ever seen in a television show because it's well edited the music builds up this Like you're getting pumped just from watching the previously on you're not watching it Just so you can be reminded of what you saw You're getting pumped up for it because of how well this part is edited for episode two to six And apparently this was immensely popular in the bbc apparently had absolutely huge numbers For viewers and I totally understand why it's a great show It was phenomenal to watch. It was very enthralling Like I said, just the ending is not exactly as clean as it could be. It's a little cheesy, but that's really the only detractor and leading up to the last episode is kind of a little bit dry here and there But it's always gripping you it's always entertaining you and it is again very well shot extremely well shot I'm gonna give bodyguard a six out of seven. I would watch this again in a heartbeat I enjoyed it immensely And I think it is definitely one of the better shows to watch on netflix right now If you guys have not seen it, I would definitely suggest I don't know where they're gonna go with the second season because This kind of just feels like a one-off just with what happens But I guess we'll find out anyways guys I hope you enjoyed this review if you did leave a like and if you're interested in more maybe subscribe Otherwise, I'll see you guys next time. Thanks for watching the video. You're probably wondering who I am My name is nits and you might remember me from the animated cult classic tv show undergrads It's been a while But I'm happy to say the click is finally getting back together in an all new movie Thanks to a successful Kickstarter campaign, but we are still asking for your support You know nits, you can't get more money unless you offer questionable favors Yeah, guy unless of course those favors involve the ladies guy By support. I mean getting the word out guys. Oh, well, couldn't you find a better means than this guy? All he seems to talk about is supernatural or hold a coffee mug real awkward. Why didn't you ask a Kardashian or something? Yeah, guy get in with the ladies guy Hey, he's trying to help out like you've been trying with kimmy Burton. I've seen job of the hut finish a marathon faster Yeah, guy, you're a massive slug thing guy To see any and all updates about the upcoming undergrads movie Be sure to check out and like the bring back undergrads facebook page and with any luck. We'll see you guys soon


Well, listen, we really want to do something sort of a little reflective as you prepare to be for your second term here, and we'll just have some domestic things. There seem to be some signs that you intend to stay on the sidelines and let Congress wrestle with a lot of the touchy things like the budget social security callers and that sort of thing, at least in the beginning of this second term. Is that your intent? No, and how that story has been concocted or what it's based on, I don't know. We've been putting in long and bloody hours on this budget matter, and in a few weeks we will be ready. But we've been keeping our people up there in the Congress posted on this, keeping them as well informed as we can of where we are, the type of things that we're talking about doing, and in a short time, as I say in just a matter of a few weeks, we will be delivering to Congress our proposal, and we think it will be on target with what we're trying to do for 1986. Are you so content that you have a Senate Republican's right of budget, which is very different from the way you acted your first term? Well, except that those same leaders have been, we've been in touch with them. They know what we're talking about, and frankly we're glad to have that, and if they've got any ideas that we haven't had, but this is their version, but it's based on what we've been doing. And you don't feel in any sense that you have abdicated your leadership responsibility? Oh, no. No. All these lines as if, well, when the election was over, I sat back and disappeared or something. I disappeared into the cabinet room where we've been having these meetings for endless hours. There wasn't anything to go out and wave a flag about until we have it put together. And then after you have it put together, you've got to allow your cabinet officers and department heads to come in on their own and present their views as to whether we can do better or whether we've done too much. Despite the work that you've been doing on the budget, it seems likely from what David Stockman has said and others have said that you will go out of office as a president presided over the biggest deficits in history. Are you resigned to that? Well I almost have to be, although if I also go out of office with having us put us for the first time in 50 years on a declining deficit pattern to where we can target a date certain that the budget will be balanced and put us on a program that is of a permanent nature so that that's the end of deficit spending, you have to realize how much this has been built in. This increase is not anything that we created. This was the built in pattern from 1965 to 1980. This was when the war on poverty and the great society really got underway and came into effect. Well in those 15 years, the budget increased almost five times what it was 15 years before, but the deficit increased to 38 times what it was before. 1974, the Congress came up with a whole new budget plan. They had a new procedure and since they did that I don't think we've had a budget. All they do is tear apart the budget that you send up, but in those several years from 1974 on up to past 1980 there were more than $500 billion in deficit. The pattern was set. The first part of your, you said if you go out of office with a date cert when the budget will be balanced that would mitigate somewhat against all of that. What is that date? My understanding is it doesn't show up in any of the documents I've seen, not 1989. Well what we're aiming at right now is a program in which we can project, in other words a three-year program, 86 through 88, which is about all that I can be responsible for. And as I say, you can't be too certain about projections as a matter of fact, most of the projections that we inherited were far more pessimistic than they turned out to be. You are no fan of economic projections, I know. No, not at all. In the struggle to balance or reduce the deficit, how much are you thinking about your role in history? Actually, I know I get that question an awful lot as if you sit over here and that's all you think about is when they go right in the history books. You know what the truth of the matter is, I don't think about it at all. I think about trying to get the job done. And I came here with an idea in mind of what I felt should be done, that it was time that something should be done both in the international scene but also domestically. I've been out of the mashed potato circuit talking about it for three or four decades. And so we started in with the plan. And as you know, the only thing that has remained constant are the pessimists. They're still around. They said the plan wouldn't work. And now that it's working, they say it won't last. Well, they were wrong the first time and they're wrong the second time. This is the first recovery in eight recessions since World War II that has been a real recovery based on solid principles in which unemployment has come down, at the same time inflation has come down, the same time the interest rates have come down. If you look back in the history of previous recessions, you'll find that usually they brought about what they said was a recovery artificially. And you'd have, well, if unemployment came down, some inflation went up. This is a recovery based on solid principles where all these things are happening. There were three years before we got here of double digit inflation. We've now had the last three years of inflation down in the 4% range. The interest rate, prime rate was 21%. It's now 10.5%. So we're down to half of what that was. And I think we're going to see it continue to go lower. Unemployment, 3.3 million people got jobs just in the last year. There are more people, close to 108 million people working, more people employed than ever in the history of our country. So all of these, I think, are solid gains that show that what we came into office to do has been accomplished except that it takes time. It'll have to continue. In referring to those, those are a lot of that, a lot of your legislative excess in the beginnings of those kind of successes occurred early in your first term and then picked up, particularly in the legislative area. Historically, second terms for presidents have not been roaring successes.  What are your expectations? Do you expect to be as successful legislatively as you were the first term? I think there's a very good chance of it, because I think that the very thing you were talking about, the size of the deficits, has finally caught everybody's attention. And I think that there's a possibility that we'll see one of those moments when we forget we're Democrats and Republicans and realize that we're citizens of this country and we've got a job to do, that it is, in other words, it's of crisis proportions. And it is based on built-in spending increases that must be altered and altered permanently. Mr. President, some people say that recovery has benefited primarily white people, that the we, the people inaugural we are about to witness is a we, the white people inaugural. Given your meeting this week with some black representatives, do you have any thoughts about how to reach out to the majority of blacks who are not in your column? Well, I know that there are a number of leaders of various organizations that are coming forth all the time with reports that build this idea that somehow we've relegated the black community to a second-class status. Well, that's not our intent and that's not our practice. First of all, of the people, since we came here who got jobs, more than a million of them are blacks who have been left the unemployment ranks, it's true that they've got farther to go. There was no question of that, that based on some of our past history and all, they have, they're on an upward climb, but as I say, they have further to go. What we have done, we have some things before the Congress that we haven't gotten yet that would be further of benefit to them. The Enterprise Zones Program would benefit them disproportionately to others. It's been there three years and we haven't been able to get it through the House. The very fact of reducing inflation has been of benefit to people who are in the lower earning scale, because it means a lot more to them. We've, in education, the number of blacks who are now getting college and university educations is far higher than it has ever been in our history. There must be specific things. This is what we talked about with this group of very fine people who came in, these black leaders from every kind of calling you can imagine. We have done more than has ever been done with regard to stimulating in a small business community, entrepreneurship, business among, that are black owned. We have, in aiding that, we have made sure that government contracts definitely are aimed to make sure that minority owned businesses get a fair crack at those. Now, all of this is aimed at a problem that has been ignored by too many people in the various ethnic communities in our country. And we have them, as you know, the Irish and South Boston and so forth. You find that their standard of living, their prosperity, is based on how many times a dollar that comes into that community by way of pay, the individual goes out to work and brings home his paycheck, how many times that dollar turns over before it gets back out into the general economy out of that community. Now, in most communities that can be up to seven or eight times and that means that's the equivalent of seven or eight dollars in the economy that it produces. In the black communities, it has been barely one. In other words, they have in the past been behind with having professionals and businesses that are owned and performed by blacks within their own community when they go down to buy groceries in their own neighborhood, they've been buying them from a white-owned business. Well, that is changing and that's what we're aiming at is to get them into the same framework of being able to turn the dollars over. They don't seem in general to accept the idea that you're aiming at helping them at all. In terms of the election, nine out of ten, I think, black voters voted for your opposition. How would you rate that in terms of disappointments? You had said during the end of the first term that you were going to make a major effort to reach out to black voters and all voters and it didn't seem to work. Well, maybe because they weren't told very much by some of those leaders we're talking about of what we've accomplished and what we've done. I don't think that the rank and file know about minority-owned businesses and how far we've gone with that. I don't think they know about legislation that we have sent up to the Hill, like the enterprise owns that has not been passed, legislation that in other areas that has to do with improving their status. I don't think they know about the fair housing proposals that we have sent up there and a democratic majority has not dealt with.  Why don't you like my policies? Why won't blacks vote Republican? What is the problem here? I tried that in the very beginning and I found out very frankly that they are so committed politically as a party that they don't want to hear. And I have to come to the conclusion that maybe some of those leaders are protecting some rather good positions that they have and they can protect them better if they can keep their constituency aggrieved and believing that they have a legitimate complaint. If they ever become aware of the opportunities that are improving, they might wonder whether they need some of those organizations. As you start another four years with the distinction of being the oldest president in history, are you getting tired of this job? Are you getting weary of it? Is the excitement gone? No, not at all. Well, it seems it is to most of your chief staff who are all sort of going off and being replaced. The old gang is leaving. Oh no, I can understand that. I can understand when you come into government it's a little different than the private sector. Someone gives up a great deal to take an appointment in government. It's a cabinet position or whatever it is. And unlike a business where there's the continued challenge of the profit motive and growth and so forth, yes, after a time, I can see where some of the excitement has gone in that particular job. But what we found out here is that it doesn't mean that it's just that it's gone for being continuing to work in government or they wouldn't be taking other jobs. When you start listing the people that are leaving, yes, a few have left and for legitimate reasons that they knew when they came that they were not going to stay endlessly. And I said in appointing them from the very first, I said if these people that I've selected and want to come to government, if they can only come for a year or two, fine, I'll take them and then get someone else if they have to return to their private lives. But when you have someone that goes from one position to another, we found that out in California when I was governor, even with some of the permanent staff of government, that we took people that had been 20 years in jobs and we switched them with other people and you'd be surprised. The first protest was, I've been doing this for 20 years. What do you mean? I've got to go over here. You'd be surprised before the next six months was over after those changes. You never saw happier people in your life more excited when they found a new challenge. They were asking questions in the new position and saying, well, why are you doing it this way? Well, they say, well, why don't we do it this way? Well, the same thing happens with these appointees. Mr. President, the question is, are you still excited? I don't think they're going to let you switch with George Bush, for example, and I don't think you want to. No, not as long as I stay healthy. And you expect to, I presume. Yes. No, I think the difference is in here, as I say, I had a reason that compelled me to do this and as long as the challenge is still there and it still is, as I said earlier, the job isn't finished. So, no, I'm just... You must have a different feeling starting a second term, though, compared to the excitement of the first when you brought a Republican Senate with you. There were all these signs of major changes. During the second campaign, it was, I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing. Can that be as exciting? Yes, it is because, as I say, we've got a great start. If you really look at the whole tone of government today and what was being debated in government up until four years ago about cost or programs and this new program and let's spend money over here and doing this, the whole debate now has turned around to how much should the rate of cutting be and what should we cut? No one's talking about new programs and spending more money by government. No one's talking about more authority in the federal government. We're adjusting and giving back to local government and to state governments authority that the federal government should never have taken from them in the first place. And then I have an experience, a previous experience, that makes this exciting. As Governor of California, most of our great accomplishments came in the second term. The great welfare reform that was different than anything that's ever been accomplished in this nation took place in the second term. But having conquered the agenda, you don't feel a little of the thrill of the chase has gone? Oh, no. No. Because, as I say, if you walked away now and someone else came in with a different view, all of this could be unraveled. The idea is to get it clenched and in place that we can then have an amendment to the Constitution that says hereafter the federal government cannot borrow money. It must stay within its means. Have an economic recovery that is based in sound principles to where the people have accepted that if the government takes too much money from the private sector, you have these recessions that we've been having for 50 years. Let's look at the foreign policy quick before... Quick on foreign policy then. Are you, at this point, are you so committed to the Star Wars defense, the SDI initiative that you'd be willing to go out of office not having achieved any arms control if the Soviets won't move on the other two? Well, I don't think... I don't look at it as that... that that is a possibility. I think when they actually see this and the very fact that Geneva, we successfully put it there as one of the things that's going to be negotiated, you see when they're talking space wars and so forth, they're talking about some things where they're even ahead of us and that is having nuclear weapons in space that can shoot down at us. We're not talking about anything of that kind. We're talking about research to see if there is not a defense that can be built that doesn't kill people, kills weapons that can keep the weapons from coming to your shores if there is such a thing. I would hope that they would work on such a thing. If you can have that, then the very thing that they themselves have said they want to do in addition to these weapons becomes more than just possible. How important is it to actually signing an arms control agreement with the Soviets to you in the sense of an accomplishment a record book accomplishment? I don't believe since research is contained in the ABM treaty today I don't think that this is going to cause a walk away from the table and if it is then they never meant to come to the table to begin with. But let me point out something that they'd have to consider. Suppose we could succeed in getting down to the point of elimination of nuclear weapons but we know how to make nuclear weapons and if down some place in the future there should come a time of strain and stress who would know if somebody they would have to think maybe we were doing we could think that they were doing somebody say hey maybe let's get a few of these things ready for use and who would know that they were doing it? But if in the meantime our technology has made it plain that there is a defense against such things then you have guarded against that ever happening in the future for it's the same thing in other words as when at Geneva World War I we outlawed chemical weapons gas, poison gas but our soldiers on both sides, all sides were also still equipped with gas masks and we find today because why? Because people have knowing how to make it have continued to make it or started in to make it again well the same thing with the nuclear weapons you see the point is all we're asking for is the research and we have said to them that if such a weapon research is fruitful and if such a weapon is developed we're not going to keep it a secret and we'd be very happy then to sit down with them and say hey now let's look at the situation here Mr. President I wanted to ask you a quick question about the influence of your wife on your policy the influence that I think any wife has on a husband if you've got a happy marriage and we do have one thing as if you know that's one thing may I just may I voice a frustration it's not only my wife it's everyone is this picture that is being created that I sit at the desk and wait to see who's going to grab this arm and pull me this way or grab this one and pull me that way you know something I'm too old and stubborn to put up with that I know I make up my mind and I do I listen for counsel and advice I want to get expertise from people expert in various fields but I haven't changed my views since I've been here and with Nancy yes we've been married for 30 odd years and of course we talk and of course she has opinions and I listen to her opinions sometimes we argue about them and I don't listen but sometimes well as I say we get along and I find myself going home and I think like every other happy husband telling her what the day was like and what we did and all what did you last fight about? no not fight argue maybe I should have put that disgust so I just want to point out that we you know like any other human beings we don't always see something of that kind but it doesn't make any dense in the marriage thank you Mr. Mayor so you're going to be right in this second time? they've never done that yes they've never done anything else thank you for spending time with us it was a pleasure to be here I think that part of that part of that is the only distance between them you don't take a look when I heard on all sides of the discussion when we dated I made the decision California Bear yes I've been dated yes alright


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebrakes.com doing a quick random number block randomizer for the following teams right here braves Nationals Red Sox Dodgers Cubs Marlins A's this sells out museum picker team 15 Which is gonna be in a separate video if you're not familiar with how it works You can read all about it right here. Remember non numbered cards will be randomizes one lot Don't forget the zero one-of-one situation here big. Thanks to this group For finishing off this number block. There are the numbers right there Let's roll it. Let's randomize it four and a five nine times for names and numbers one two three four five six seven eight and Ninth and final time For nine Sean down to Alex four and a five nine times for the teams two three teams numbers four five six seven eight and I said nine right yep ninth and final time For nine we got nine down to two All right, Sean with nine and three Nicholas with zero So you'll get any and all redemptions including one-of-one redemptions for those teams right there on the bottom tab Including one of one redemptions Jackson You'll still get live one-of-ones that we if we happen to pull any for those teams Sean with five Martin with seven Jackson with six and four Sean with eight and Alex with two So it's sort by a number and coming up in a separate video will be that museum collection break We'll see you for that. Jasper's case breaks.com


Welcome to the SNAP. This is the segment where we answer frequently asked questions in a very rapid fire format. So let's get right into it. On today's episode of the SNAP, I'm going to be demonstrating how to use the Icespire Wand as an induction heater for your Dynavat vaporizer. Originally designed for dabbing, the Wand from Icespire is the perfect high-performance induction heating device for your Dynavat vaporizer. The Wand comes with two high-performance 2900 mAh 18650 batteries. The Wand is also rechargeable using USB-C type connectivity.  And if you hold both of these buttons, you will adjust your temperature from Fahrenheit to Celsius. There are two primary ways to heat a Dynavat vaporizer with the Icespire Wand, with or without the Dynavat adapter. To install your Icespire Wand Dynavat adapter, take your open end and firmly press from behind until it is snug. To heat the Dynavat vaporizer with the Icespire Wand, press the fire button twice to activate auto mode. The chamber light will begin flashing orange. Insert the Dynavat vaporizer into the heating chamber and wait until you hear the click. Then remove immediately. To use the Icespire Wand without the adapter, there are a few things to keep in mind. Do not let your vaporizer touch the inside of the Icespire heating chamber. Heat your Dynavat by just placing the cap end into the heating chamber. Do not put the cap too far into the chamber. You do not need to rotate your Dynavat while using the Icespire Wand. To use the Icespire Wand with the adapter, place your Dynavat vaporizer into the heating chamber. The adapter holds your vaporizer in place as it heats. When you hear the click, remove immediately. In conclusion, the Icespire Wand is a great option for those that want to try an induction heater and not break the bank, while also getting a portable unit that can be used for dabbing as well. This has been the Snap. Thanks for watching. Let us know in the comments below what other accessories and items you would like to see demonstrated. If you found this video helpful, click the subscribe button and give us a like. If you like what you see, make sure that you check out the other videos on our We Tube channel.


programme later exposed serious concerns about his conviction. Last year, a new book identified a more likely suspect. This prompted Bob Alexander, Margaret's former fiance, to break his 47-year silence to state that George Beattie is innocent. He thought that this miscarriage of justice would finally be put right. Nothing happened. We do not have time to rehearse all the evidence here today, but I say with confidence that George Beattie is innocent. I am not the first politician to stand in a Parliament and say so. The late Labour MP Jimmy Hood did just that in the House of Commons 28 years ago, despite all this, George told me he expects to go to his grave as a wrongly convicted murderer. This case shames Scotland, but having spent decades working as a journalist, trying to shine a light on injustice, it does not surprise me. Willie Beattie devoted his life fighting to overturn his 1981 conviction for armed robbery. Credible and independent people are certain of his innocence. Willie died suddenly last year. His family vowed to keep up the fight. Some might say that this is history. Society has changed. I would say in response, open your eyes. Injustice is rife in modern Scotland. It has a corrosive impact. Its effects are profound, often consuming lives or cutting them short. It does not just mean wrongful convictions. Take the family of Kevin MacLeod, who was found dead in Wick Harbour in 1997. For two decades, the authorities dismissed this young man's death as not suspicious, then admitted that it should have been treated as murder or Emma Caldwell, who was murdered in 2005, as we have already heard so powerfully from Pauline McNeill. Detectives blindly pursued the wrong suspects when a much more likely perpetrator was right in front of them or Sheikou Bayou, who died in police custody on a five-street six years ago. Yet his loved ones still do not know what happened, or the countless families who have suffered medical negligence sometimes resulting in the loss of a loved one. While stricken with grief, they have to contend with a confusing and intimidating legal process. Then there are their former Rangers administrators, innocent men, maliciously prosecuted by the Crown Office. This left taxpayers with a bill for unknown millions, yet the former Lord Advocate responsible today sits in the High Court bench dispensing justice. I have been inspired by the resilience, determination and dignity of many ordinary people plunged into the abyss of injustice. Among the first were the so-called four Bampots of Milton in Glasgow. Those brave local fathers objected when Labour politicians and the police handed control of their community centre to a drugs gang. They defintely embraced the term Bampots, which the council had used to smear them. Labour defended indefensible for years. The gang was only evicted when people started getting shot dead on Glasgow streets. No one in authority was ever held to account for this perversion or for many other of these scandals. That is a common theme. While injustices will always occur, they are compounded when there is no address and no accountability. Too often, public bodies use unlimited funds to crush legitimate complaints, wage war on whistleblowers and use non-disclosure agreements to hide the ugly truth from the public. Bad faith, back covering and secrecy contaminate too many of our institutions. In Scotland, legal regulation is not fit for purpose, as we heard from Michelle Thomson. Our police complaint system betrays both the public and honest officers. Our prosecution service is capable of malice and routinely betrays victims. Our courts are secretive, self-serving and chronically inefficient. Our parole system treats victims as a nuisance. Our judicial complaint system is a toothless charade. In Scotland, sudden deaths are not automatically subject to public scrutiny, often leaving grieving families with no answers. That was very powerfully touched upon by Liam McArthur. When rigged systems close the door in victims and close ranks to protect wrongdoers, what hope is there for ordinary people? Elsewhere in the United Kingdom, many of these very same serious problems have been identified and reformed to the benefit of the public. One of the most nauseating aspects of nationalism is the myth of self-righteous superiority and exceptionalism. The injustices that I am speaking about here are entirely made in Scotland. This Parliament has the power to fix them, but the SNP preferred to dupe our citizens with our relentless diet of manufactured grievance and dishonestly blaming all our ills on Westminster. Scotland deserves so much better. Rampant injustice and the dangers of Scottish nationalism are two reasons that I decided to seek election. Is that a maiden speech? I believe that it is not convention. That's okay. But you can if you want. It's not. There's no rule against it. I'll track on. I'm sure there will be another time. I'm fairly certain of that. But the catalyst for me standing here today came in the morning of December 23, 2015. I answered my front door to a man dressed as a postman. He was in fact a hit man. He threw sulphuric acid into my face and tried to stab me. My young daughter witnessed this horror. She could have witnessed my murder. My subsequent personal experience of the criminal justice system confirmed everything that I'd seen as a journalist. It made me angry. It made me realise that unless people stand up and be counted, nothing will change. To be thrust into the public eye has been a daunting process for me. I spent almost 30 years hidden from view because of the very real threat from organised crime. These gangs have become obscenely wealthy and immensely powerful. Their drugs kill record numbers of our people. There is much more to be said about this than I will be saying it. It surprises me today in a debate about justice. Not a single word has been spoken about organised crime. I'm grateful for all who have supported me and for the voters of the west of Scotland who put me here. I pledge to work hard for my constituents. Deputy Presiding Officer, I will conclude by returning to matters at hand. Today we have heard important contributions from members across the chamber. Not least from Katie Clark and Faisal Chowdhury, who are also doing their maiden speeches today. It is heartening to hear so much consensus between the various parties. I will simply add that today's Scottish Conservative amendment offers significant practical measures to begin the process of creating a fairer Scotland. Thank you, and could I now call on Keith Brown, cabinet secretary, to wind up the debate for the Government? Moving to decision time around five would be very helpful. Thank you, Presiding Officer. I'd like to thank all members for their contributions to today's debate. My first is cabinet secretary for justice and veterans. It has generally been informative and certainly wide-ranging, demonstrating a collective ambition to achieve a more effective justice system for the people of Scotland and, of course, a wee different views on how that endeavour might be achieved. I welcome the honesty and commitment that most members have shown to help inform that journey. I opened the discussion with a commitment to try and build consensus. You can see how difficult that is going to be, but where it is possible, I will try and do that. I have tried to do that in the discussions that have already taken place with Opposition spokespeople. I want to firstly repeat the aspiration for collective progress by this Parliament. It is a genuine aspiration. Today's exchanges have in no way diminished my appetite for collaboration both in the context of the Government's extensive and ambitious programme of commitments, but also as we look to ensure that a justice system is exemplary in its handling of victims, witnesses and the accused. I look forward to genuine ideas and suggestions as to how that best might be achieved. I have no doubt that that will lead to, if it happens, even more productive debates going forward. It is also important that we discuss in greater detail the range of levers that are currently available to justice partners as we emerge through the recovery phase of the pandemic and consider what greater action may be possible. I said previously how impressed I was with the remote jury centre initiative, which I witnessed yesterday, recognising those early concerns that were rightly raised by representative bodies at the start of the pandemic and the need for appropriate on-going assessment and analysis. That innovation has raised questions and delivered opportunities. Previously, if we are honest, it was not considered appropriate and it is now a feature in our justice system, and it has been looked at by justice systems worldwide in terms of the Covid environment and how to respond to it. Indeed, Scotland has been compared to other jurisdictions in leading the charge on that initiative. It is a clear example of where further thinking on how those centres feature in the medium to longer term that that thinking is required and should be done so openly and publicly. If I can try to pick up on some of the key points that are made today, there have been so many, so please forgive me if I miss anybody out. It is not intentional. Many of them have common themes. First of all, I congratulate the other justice spokespeople, newer ones and those more established in that role to their positions. I will come back to the first of the speeches by Pam Gosall if I could towards the end of my remarks. Rona Mackay, I thank her for her remarks especially in relation to the different approaches to justice, a human rights-centred approach. Katie Clark, I congratulate her on her first speech. I also was a unison branch officer and shop sure. Never reached the exalted ranks of solicitor, but it was a great time to be in unison. I listened to the comments that she makes and found that there was a lot of areas where I think that we can agree. James Dornan alone raised the very important issue of sectarianism and anti-catholicism, which we have to have regard to. Michelle Thomson mentioned the register of interests, which we will take forward. Many of her other comments are ones that I am sure will be picked up by the minister who will have responsibility in the areas that she was talking about. Alexander Stewart, I was keen to listen constructively, but you can only do that from the basis of facts. You can have your own views, but you cannot really have your own facts. The simple fact is that in England there has been a reduction of 17,000 police officers. In Scotland, we have over 1,000 more police officers than when we came to office. Crime has gone down substantially more in Scotland than it has elsewhere. Police officers are paid more in Scotland than they are elsewhere, so you cannot invent or change these facts. If you want to have a discussion about that, which I am happy to be involved in, at least have regard to the actual facts that apply. Audrey Nicola thought that a fantastic speech, in particular mentioning wellbeing as a feature both of our justice system and of policing, is much more than simply law enforcement, is about the wellbeing of society. Like others, I thought that Fuzzle Childress was an excellent speech. Although education is not my responsibility, the point that he made about using education to teach some of the history—some history might not want to face otherwise—about how we accumulated wealth in this country in the UK is a very good point. I made it myself in a debate before the election, and I am confident that the education ministers will take that forward. However, I thought that it was an excellent speech by Fuzzle Childress. Christine Grahame rightly highlighted the civil side, which is a huge part and probably impacts more people than the criminal side. In mediation, can I make a genuine offer to say that I am happy to mediate between her and Edward Mountain, as to whose pen that is, but I would warn Christine Grahame that possession is nine-tenths of the loss of the balance of... I will do very quickly. Christine Grahame, your offer is rejected. I can also say to Emma Harper that I made a number of very good points. Again, some of those points will be areas that the minister will be responsible for and the other points that I am responsible for. I am happy to respond to some of them in writing. It will take too long to do just now, but I have made a number of good points, not least in the location of duty centres. Femm goes all very much like Alexander Stewart. It may be the case that simply a litany of anti-SNP diatribes is the way to go. I just think that if you want to have a genuinely constructive debate, that is not the way to go. Also, a dialogue is better than a monologue, so accepting an intervention, and it would have been a constructive one, I hope, would have been, I think, more helpful in terms of a genuine debate. I hope that, in time, she will be able to take genuine interventions and try and have a dialogue rather than a monologue. We are not going to get anywhere if we have, as I think we had before the election, simply trying to trash the entire justice and policing system in this country. Let's start from the fact that, if there are things that are wrong, I accept that and I am willing to take on those challenges.  Russell Finlay's points are right about serious organised crime. It was not mentioned and it is extremely important. I would offer genuinely to him the offer made to me by the chief council and others to talk about some of the work, not all of which we can do in the public domain, that is going on, very serious work and very good work. I realise that he will have reservations about how effective it is, but I think that that would help inform some of his views about what the police are doing. I thought that the attacks on the SNP were just pointless, to be honest. It could have been a much more productive contribution to make. Once again, if we want to have a genuine dialogue, I am happy to be involved in it. In some of the historic cases that he mentioned, he knows more about them than I do, and I accept that. The criminal cases review commission will look at those cases. I am sure that they have tried that before. It is not for me to reopen former cases, but I am not saying that some of the points that he raised, especially the one about Mr McCloud, which I am aware of, are not serious cases. However, those injustices are looked at in a particular way. Again, I am perfectly happy to have a genuine discussion with him about that. Very quickly, I can turn to the amendments, convener. There is much across them, which I am happy to agree with. There are a few areas that I wish to highlight in the specific amendments. First, Labour's amendment supports our overall ambition for the justice sector. However, it is worth noting that decisions around domestic abuse courts and, indeed, all specialist courts currently is a constitutional matter for the Lord President, the President and the senior judiciary. Those are issues that I think should be considered. I think that Jamie Greene made this point as well. The relationship between jury size and other aspects, or jury juries, and some of the changes proposed by Lady Dorian, should be considered in my view in the round. I cannot accept that, but I am willing to come back to that. I am sure that we will do that very soon. I really do not have much time. I am sorry that I am trying to wind up for the last time that the Opposition speaks so far. I apologise, but I do not have time to do that. In relation to the Lib Dem's amendment on fatal accident inquiries, Parliament has agreed substantial reforms to the inquiries into fatal accidents in sudden deaths in 2016. It was passed with unanimous support and additional resources have been applied, and it is having an effect. I do not deny that there are cases, some very high-profile cases that give cause for concern, but currently, I think that less than 2 per cent of the fatal accident or sudden deaths have resulted in FAIs, which have lasted more than two years. I will continue to work on that, but I cannot accept that amendment. On the Conservatives' amendment, there is much that we can agree on in relation to that. I agree with the need to continue to place victims and victims rights at the heart of the justice system. I tried to cover that in my opening remarks, and I know that we will come back to that, both by the Government and the Conservative Party, also on restorative justice and secure funding, but there is so much else, not least on not proven. If you are going to go with the proposal that the Conservatives mentioned, you really have to consider the other aspects that are not proven in terms of size of juries and many other things in the justice system. For that reason, it is important that we take that forward, and that is what the consultation will do. I am not by any means shutting the door on that, but I cannot accept the other points in the Conservative amendment. Additionally, some of the courts can already use their maximum sentence powers in dealing with attacks on emergency workers. It was only the Conservatives that refused to support the legislation on emergency workers back in 2006. We are happy to support the Greens amendment today, including the commitment to human rights very well articulated by Maggie Chapman and the need to ensure holistic approaches to addressing underlying causes. However, it is worth noting that issues of enforcement, as I mentioned in the amendment against corporate and environmental crime, are operational matters for the appropriate regulatory authorities. On the point about institutional violence that Pauline McNeill raised, I have spoken with the prison service and we have seen reports from the inspectorate of prison services that say that there is a very good relationship between prisons and prisoners, but the general thrust of the Greens amendment, especially in relation to human rights approach and some of the other innovations, we are happy to support. With that, and with those positions on those amendments, I am happy to conclude for the Government. That concludes the debate on justice, recover, renew, transform. The next item of business is consideration of business motion 347, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau, setting out revisions to next week's business. Any member who wishes to speak against the motion should press their request to speak button now. I call on George Adam to move the motion. No member has asked to speak against the motion, therefore the question is that motion 347 be agreed, are we all agreed? The motion is therefore agreed. The next item of business is consideration of parliamentary bureau motion 350 on a variation of standing orders. I ask George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau to move the motion. Thank you, Presiding Officer. Once again, formally moved. Thank you. The question on this motion will be put at decision time. There are six questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first is the amendment 294.1, in the name of Jamie Greene, which seeks to amend motion 294 in the name of Keith Brown on justice, recover, renew, transform, be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote and there will be a short suspension to allow members to access the digital voting system.