What's good Josh the boy Ross back again with another video. So we're gonna check out WWE videos. You are not supposed to see This should be an interesting one by none other than tap out corner Maybe there's some things we're not of supposed to have seen air on television, but we're gonna check this out You guys have been showing so much love and support on the channel I really do appreciate you guys and I'm looking forward to this video. Let's keep let's keep the support going Let's keep the the momentum going on the channel, man We're almost out of honey. K. Let's do the damn thing man WWE produces a ton of content that they are more than happy to show you However, the videos we're about to see are the ones that WWE never intended you to watch after WWE had finished filming an episode of Smackdown 2014 Michael Cole is chatting with his boss, Vince McMahon, through their headsets about some talking points The WWE Network had just launched so the company really wanted to promote it Unfortunately, since Michael Cole was a commentator He was the one who had to constantly plug the network much of the fans annoyance in the audio You can hear Michael Cole getting upset and talking back to McMahon Knowing this wow Oh This is why I do feel like Michael Cole is doing some of his best work because I'm pretty sure triple H is not just Barrowing his you know his request and Michael Cole's he headset All the time, you know I'm saying and that's what Vince would do if he wanted you to say something 20 to 30 times within a show you basically had to do it So it's crazy here Michael Cole get frustrated and it's like nah promote the WWE Network Do it now Michael Cole or fire ass. I can I can only imagine that's how I went. That's all year was yes Yes, sir. I'll do it, sir. That's crazy stories about angry Vince McMahon can get I would love to know what McMahon said to Michael Cole after that comment Originally Dean Ambrose was not supposed to be part of the shield Instead WWE planned on having Ambrose make his main roster debut by himself and feud with Mick Foley They actually began a storyline But it didn't start on TV during the weekend of WrestleMania 28 in 2012 Mick Foley was at a hotel meeting with fans Dean Ambrose who is wrestling for WWE's development company FCW at this time Approached Foley and said Mick had to be held responsible Name one Security eventually kicked Ambrose out of the building, but this looked like a real altercation Wow, of course the whole thing was planned Yeah supposed to set up a rivalry that would see Ambrose make his main roster debut due to Foley's health though The hardcore icon wasn't allowed to wrestle so the rivalry got scrapped and Ambrose eventually joined Seth Rollins in her own Reigns as the shield speaking of the shield and that's that's a crazy situation We could have got Ambrose as a solo act granted I think he works better in the shield the shield coming together just them three literally worked out perfect for them You know, so I'm actually kind of glad it didn't pan out But it would have been interesting to see Dean Ambrose really go against the hardcore legend himself Mick Foley in a second or in a program I think that would have been pretty interesting to see but I'm glad things worked out the way they did Well, their entrance was simple It was pretty cool Seth Dean and Roman would enter through the crowd rather than the entrance ramp like all the other wrestlers Yep However, the part you never saw was what was going on right before they walked out The shield will be led by a group of security guards to the spot where they're gonna walk out of There would also be a WWE production member or two who was there to give them last minute instructions if needed as for the shield themselves All three members usually had a water bottle that they would normally pour on their heads right before their music cat This is why they were almost always wet before they had done anything a lot of times if there's something WWE doesn't want you to see they'll do it during a commercial break However, thanks to smartphones This doesn't work so well anymore during commercial breaks WWE's production crew will often do things like change the ring mat if they get caught in decorations set up for an upcoming segment on the show And other things like that. However, there was one commercial break instant that basically ruined wrestling the March 13th 2020 SmackDown was the beginning of the pandemic. I think I know which segment he's talking about Inside their performance center with no fans in attendance one of the matches on the show was the women's the women's match But they forgot to cut the camera so you can see them when they went, you know, the ref tells them Yeah, we're on we're on curse commercial break So they're just everybody's just sitting in the ring chilling and the camera was still on so I do remember that one Tati match other than the lack of a crowd the match started off normally after a bit the show went to a commercial break However, there was a technical glitch for some viewers and the cameras went back to the show too early because they thought nobody was watching The wrestlers broke character and stopped wrestling each other It was something you never thought would happen Yeah, but there it was Eventually once the commercial break officially ended the women got back into character and returned The footage of Brock Lesnar's infamous WrestleMania 19 match against Kurt Angle in the fight Lesnar got in the top rope and attempted to hit a shooting star After nearly killing himself Lesnar would never attempt that or any high-risk move again. That's probably a good thing Yeah, but have you ever seen Brock Lesnar hit the shooting star press correctly before making his official WWE debut? Lesnar competed in dark matches, which were filmed but never intended to be seen by anyone During some of Lesnar's earliest WWE matches. He actually broke out the shooting star Nailed it perfectly Wow It helped that he had been wrestling an Olympic gold medalist before trying to perform the high-risk move during a different dark match Brock used a drop kick another move that Brock rarely if ever used on TV That's crazy. He started using the f5 Lesnar's finisher was a running power slam Oh later Braun Strylman used this move as his finisher around the same time that Brock Lesnar was competing in dark I'm so glad it wasn't a running power slam I ain't gonna lie to you that f5 is fucking sick I know Doug would not be happy about me saying this but the f5 That's a sick ass finisher that shit looks like it could that she looks like it hurt You just throwing someone like a goddamn pizza dough and just wherever they land they land Matches so was Randy Orton by watching these matches You can see that orange moveset was much more versatile than what he would eventually sell Part of the reason for that is that Randy Orton like almost all wrestlers was Experiment with different moves to see what worked best something else That's crazy to see in these matches is Randy Orton Mickey's entrance on the original smackdown set with the oval Titan Tron in the corner By the time Randy Orton made his official WWE debut in Chosen 2 Smackdown had switched over So it's bizarre seeing Randy Orton in this attitude era environment now Here's something that fans really were never meant to see whenever WWE does a steel cage match The cage is already set up and lowered into the ring This of course allows them to get the match started faster and looks a lot better Well when WWE is off the air they don't have to worry about all that instead of attaching the cage to the ceiling WB's production crew just brings out the individual parts of the steel cage and sets it up in the ring WWE usually only does this for matches that aren't shown on TV and are intended for just live audience Some moments are so controversial that WWE People yeah, yeah, yeah, we've we've seen the infamous Mickey James clip at WrestleMania, man That was a very interesting one, but yeah, this was pretty cool. Man. A lot of these I did not know I didn't know that Dean Ambrose at the time was potentially just gonna be a solo act feuding with Mick Foley. That's a pretty interesting Tip bit I did not know so comment down below. Let me know which one of these I guess Information or stories from this video. Did you guys not know about me didn't know about the Dean Ambrose situation? So I thought that was pretty interesting, but I appreciate all the love and support you guys I'm showing on the channel road to honey K. Appreciate y'all kicking me. See y'all next


that stop by Velazquez and just how difficult was that play to complete. Amazing especially getting up and making the play throw in it. It was a great play all around really close and happy series for us. Really I mean take over a lot probably we have a long way to go but that's just it's a really good series versus obviously the Red Sox who are you know not going anywhere. Never easy to sweep a team let alone the Boston Red Sox just what type of statement do you think you guys made this series. I think it's just good confidence for us. You know I'm not all about really making statements I just think that this group and the confidence that is building and the never the never quit mentality has just been it was fun to watch when I wasn't playing and it's just been fun to be a part of since I've been here. I was going to ask you how difficult was it to watch from the sidelines and what stood out to you about this team. Just to never quit I mean the road trip was crazy that game in Kansas City but I mean they have bats are just so professional and and it's just it's a winning formula all the way around and finishing it off tonight was was big for us. Your first game back since since August 7th just how did you feel out there. Good I feel like after the first few innings I just started feeling better and better so I just think as you check all the boxes off and playing in the game and just the adrenaline just feel better and better so definitely a good sign.


I'm going to indulge myself and deviate a little bit from my prepared remarks today because of just everything that's going on in the news. It's really almost hour by hour. And I saw earlier today Senator Rand Paul tweeted out something apparently people had been attempting to dox senators residences and announced these addresses publicly. It's probably not that hard to find anyway. In order to create mini protests, presumably, outside of their homes to convince them to vote one way or another, this coming week on the Kavanaugh nomination, which seemed like a pretty mild tweet. But nonetheless, he was immediately savaged in his responses by the Twitterati. So it's interesting. Because the topic I wanted to speak about today is whether we're winning or losing. And we can look at that a lot of different ways. In terms of economics, in terms of politics, in terms of culture, society, civilization, et cetera. And I think the answer to that question depends very much so upon your focus. But what we've seen in full flight the last couple of weeks with this Kavanaugh business, especially the last couple of days, is we've seen the political world. This is the political world in action. And I think what is fraying is the idea that politics creates some sort of compromise down the middle, where we all get a little bit of what we want, but not everything. And that, especially democratic voting, that particular form of politics is a way to reduce conflict in society. I think that's fraying. I think the idea that democracy eliminates a lot of kinetic action that we might otherwise find ourselves subject to is fraying. And I'm not sure that that's a bad thing from our perspective. We've certainly seen what I think Lou Rockwell calls the unique evil of the left. We've seen that in spades in the last couple of weeks with what's going on with Kavanaugh, and this adivistic desire to cause hatred and dissension among the sexes of all things.  I guess that's the goal. But it sure seems like an awfully malevolent goal at that. And as the father of a 12-year-old boy, I'm just going to read a couple of representative headlines from the last couple of months that I don't appreciate as a dad. New York, or excuse me, Washington Post, why can't we hate men? I want to burn the frat house of America to the ground. And here's my favorite. This is a couple of days ago in the New York Times, pigs all the way down. OK. Well, that's the political world for us. That's what the Kavanaugh confirmation is giving us. And of course, Trump being elected to office and some of the insanity that that's caused in the left-wing hive mind is behind a lot of this. But as with most of the political world, of course, it obscures the real issues and it obscures principles. Let's not give Mr. Kavanaugh too much of a pass here. It turns out not only was he someone charged with giving legal and intellectual cover to the Patriot Act when he was working for the Bush administration, he's apparently a favorite of John Yu, who is, I think, might be termed a war criminal and a legal advocate for the Bush torture regime, the Bush invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. So Mr. Kavanaugh has Mr. Yu's stamp of approval. And he's also, if you listen to the judge Napolitano, very, very bad on this pesky little detail called the Fourth Amendment, which at least presumably protects us against government surveillance and metadata collection and some other things, but not in Mr. Kavanaugh's view. So isn't it interesting that with all of the ranker that we're experiencing with all the hatred and division, none of it gets to substance or principle whatsoever. It's just about this tribal left versus right and now this new tribal man versus woman. So one of the things that really motivates me and makes me enjoy working the Mises Institute is we're the anti-political organization. If we agree with the formulation that there's basically two ways to have wealth in society, to obtain wealth. There's basically two ways to organize society. The political means and the economic means. Well, we're about economics here, and that's in effect, it's an antidote to politics. It's another way of organizing society when our critics say, well, what would you have?  And there's some truth to that. I don't deny that entirely. But the point is that when someone says, what would you do differently? Well, we don't have to say necessarily political anarchism or political atheism or agnosticism. We say, well, we'd organize the world around economics. In other words, property and trade and exchange and capital and not politics. So I think when you put it that way, it makes things not only a little less radical, but really a lot more enjoyable for me. I think that the idea that we're waking some people up to a different way to organize society is an exciting one. And that people are starting to understand that what we're seeing in Washington is a sideshow.  So on this question of whether we're gaining ground, whether we're winning or losing, I have a professor friend. He teaches at a large public university in the South, not Auburn. And I was talking to him last summer and he said to me, he said, I think the majority of my freshmen have never read a book that they enter university never having read a full length book. And is that true? I'm not sure, but it makes us worried. It makes us concerned about the non-intellectual and anti-intellectual tenor of our age. And it makes us worry that these young people are gonna be awfully susceptible to the kind of platitudes that are coming out of both parties this week around the Kavanaugh business. And of course, it's this kind of ignorance that lends credibility to people like Bernie Sanders and this Miss Acasio Cortez, I can't remember her first name, Alexandria, Alexandra. And it also bears out that information is not knowledge. We basically have the sum total of worldwide information garnered to date at our fingertips in this little deck of cards created for me by the Apple Corporation. But yet it seems like the wisdom you might take from some of that information in your fingertips is hard to arrive at. So that asks the question, what should we be doing? How should we be combating this? Well, I think the Mises Institute's role in combating this is to find those kids who do read books. And not just books, but sometimes a 900 page book. Because I think it's those kids who are gonna be just that much more important in the future and what's gonna be increasingly probably a technical and intellectual future as what at least we hope that science and technology continue to grow and outpace the state. Because I think that's really the source of our real wealth is that technology and innovation somehow, despite all the odds, outpace all the state depredations. But if there's one thing the Mises Institute could do to help, I think it would be to save young people. And when I say save, I'm gonna bring up an example from Murray Rothbard. If some of you have had an opportunity to get into the Progressive Era book, you'll know that if there's one thing Murray Rothbard hates as a reformer, and if there's one thing he really hates as a Yankee pietist reformer. And probably nobody personifies a Yankee pietist reformer more than the late John Dewey. Now John Dewey was a psychologist and he really earns Rothbard's wrath because he was almost, although he was a secular person later in life, he had this sort of evangelical zeal for saving the world through progressivism and progressivism meant statism. And according to Murray, John Dewey had a seemingly endless career. And that's because he was prolific. He lived from the 1850s all the way into the 1950s. He was a very influential man. And of course he was involved in the early stages of the founding of the New Republic magazine. And of course the New Republic was created as an unholy alliance between big business and left public intellectuals. And one of its first tasks being created just in 1914 was of course to gin up support for American involvement in World War I. And it turns out that throughout the 1910s with something like 60% of Americans having at least some German heritage that folks weren't necessarily that enthusiastic about going and fighting their first cousins over in Germany. But nonetheless, this was something that from Dewey's perspective had to be done. So in 1917 he wrote an article with a really remarkable title that's called The Conscription of Thought. We think of conscription as the military draft, the physical commandeering of young men, but he wrote The Conscription of Thought. And the purpose of this article was to reach other New Republic readers to educate them about what they could do to encourage a war spirit among these stubborn Americans who were still dubious about what from Dewey's perspective was something the United States should obviously do. And what's so interesting about the article is his desire to get America involved in the world had nothing to do with the actual battles or what was going on in Europe. He didn't care about Germany or Britain or Austro-Hungary. He didn't really care about US interests in those areas. His focus was entirely domestic. He thought that by getting the United States involved in World War I, that would enable us to create more of the collectivist government that he admired here at home and that the war collectivism he was seeing in Europe should be emulated and admired. So war would become a tool of democracy and it would foist socialism on us at home. So this was a way to achieve national greatness. And his way to achieve national greatness was that we had to go out there and take the intellectual class and we had to conscript people. We had to conscript their thoughts because up until then they had not yet been convinced. And of course, if we conscript their thoughts, then their bodies and their wallets will follow fairly certainly thereafter. And so today I think we were in the same situation where young people were having their thoughts conscripted and that we have to do everything we can to provide them an alternative to this. And I think that's really what the Mises Institute does. So some of the ways we might say looking back and looking forward that we're winning is of course to compare today to let's say just 20 or 30 years ago when the Mises Institute was being founded.  And certainly if you compare academia today as rotten as it is to the tenor and tone 100 years ago when Dewey was at his height, when socialism and communism were viewed as the future in the West. And people thought that there was a scientific or a technocratic way to engineer prosperity that didn't involve markets. I think things are very much improved in that we somehow miss this because we get so mired in the problems of our own age. I think if we mentioned this last year in New York City, if we look at the legacy of Ludwig von Mises himself today versus 30 or 50 years ago, things are very much improved. Gary North makes the joke that as recently as the 1970s perhaps if you mentioned the name Mises people would say do you mean Richard? Meaning his very, his somewhat famous mathematician brother who is a brilliant statistician at Harvard for many years. Nobody says when you say Mises today nobody says do you mean Richard? So we're making progress and especially when it comes to technology in the digital age, I mean the access to virtually every great book, to every great paper in the Austro-libertarian tradition, immediate, generally free online and digital form is pretty astounding if we think about it. And I'm sure a lot of people in this room can recall it wasn't that long ago. Let's say you went into your local bookstore, your Walden books. Does anybody remember Walden books? Or B. Dalton? Antoine's looking at me with an odd. He's got to look at me sideways. But the point is that when you went into that bookstore they might have had some Ayn Rand books. They might have had John Kenneth Galbraith's A Fluent Society, a few books along those lines but they didn't have any Rothbard. They didn't have any Mises. And in fact, even your local public library or your local university library wouldn't have any Rothbard or Mises. Not so, so long ago. So that's radically changed. So technology has been an almost unbelievable leveler for us in the libertarian and Austrian movement. And of course, even if we look at the two dominant political ideologies of our day which are basically neoliberalism and neoconservatism, both of these are deeply flawed doctrines. But you'll notice, unlike in Dewey's time, both of them at least give some lip service to the idea of markets and property as a generator of wealth in society. You'll notice even Bono from U2 who's a human I find insufferable. But nonetheless, people like to listen to him and he's involved in aid in Africa and he's said some pretty interesting things in the last couple of years about what Africa really needs in terms of capitalism. So you'll see that there are in drips and pieces where you're starting to break through culturally. So what then is the exact role of the Mises and Sue? We say we wanna reach people, we wanna save their minds from being conscripted but what might that actually look like? Well, I think in the future, it's going to look more and more like what we might call a newer alternative school. You know, when we think of school and when we think of universities today, and I know Peter Klein and Parab, Byland have both talked about this, they're basically using the same model that they were using a thousand years ago. There's basically a one directional lecture given to the passive recipient students to go home and sort of regurgitate that on a test and that hasn't changed that much. And we think with all the student loan debt out there, more than a trillion dollars, about 1.3 trillion dollars in student loan debt. And this is, of course, is having ripple effects throughout the economy in terms of marriage, home buying, having children, all kinds of things. You'd think, guys, that can't last too much longer. And there's different opinions on that. We certainly hope it's crashing down. Brian Kaplan has a new book out where he seems to, he's a little more pessimistic.  But whether it does or doesn't, I think for a lot of individuals, the amount of debt that they might incur versus the benefit of this credential they earn is starting to become a losing proposition. And I think that rises, that raises the prospects of the Mises Institute in this equation. So if we think of education not as something that you necessarily do in a university setting or in a particular place where you go to in a brick or mortar form, if we think of education as something that is increasingly important as a lifetime prospect, a process of lifelong learning where no one is in these sort of set stable careers where you can just learn a particular set of skills and then coast for the next 40 years like people used to do in certain careers, when we think that that's out the window. When we think of the growing role of online learning in all of this, I think it really positions us to be an alternative school of sorts and nothing short of that. And you'd be amazed at the people who contact us and reach out to us as to how they consume our material. So school in the form of lifelong education becomes radically reconstituted. What's school? Well, it depends. It depends on how much education you feel you want or need to consume. In other words, you become a consumer of sorts. So for some people, all they want or need from the Mises Institute is maybe to follow our Twitter feed or our Facebook feed and occasionally see an article that looks interesting and click on it and learn something. And that's all that they need or want from us. And then there's other people who become so inspired and so interested in all of the world of economics. They end up coming here. They decide they want economics to become their profession. Maybe they spend a summer with us as a fellow.  But there's a lot of people in between those two polls. And we wanna be here for those people really on every level. What we've learned about online learning is that it really doesn't match that 1,000-year-old model. What people want out of it's different. They want shorter, pithier, video-type material. And they tend to, just like in regular university, they tend to have a lot of enthusiasm at the beginning of a course. And then as the course proceeds, they start to drop out and lose interest. The participation wanes. And so no one's really figured out the online model yet. Even websites like Khan Academy and Udacity have not completely figured out what it looks like. But we're learning. We're slowly but surely learning. And we're getting more and more people consuming some of our online content. And of course, what's interesting about it is that when you don't have some of the motivators you have in a regular university setting, and one of those big motivators is if your parents are paying. And the other is that you don't want to flunk. And the other is that you need the credit to graduate. And all of these kinds of things, if you take that away, you find that in an online context, people still need some amount of systemization. They still need us, the Mises Institute, to come along and sort of put it together in a way that makes sense for them. So it's not enough to just hand them human action or man economy and state.  And present it in a way that's palatable and understandable to them. So there's still a big need to get just beyond the great books itself. So that's really part of our vision is to systematize things for people and make it easy for them and make it accessible for them, make it convenient for them, and make it cheap or even free for them to do. So when it comes to those freshmen that I mentioned who enter university without having read a single book, we reach a point where we have to have a target audience. We have to say we're not a mass movement. We're not necessarily for everyone. We want to reach the people who are going to be the leaders of tomorrow, at least the thought leaders, the intellectual people of tomorrow. And that's really our goal is to be there for them and to be there for them in new and radical and innovative ways, because the political status quo isn't working. I think what we're going to see, especially if Kavanaugh is confirmed next week, is a lot of protests and almost insurrection. And again, none of it has anything to do with principle. None of it has anything to do with philosophy. None of it has anything to do with right or wrong. The Republicans and the Supreme Court with or without Kavanaugh are not going to touch Roe versus Wade. They're not going to do anything about that. They're not going to change that. The Democrats, they don't care about the Fourth Amendment. They don't care about any of this. They care about reducing Kavanaugh into a bloody pulp on the ground. And so this isn't an alternative to war. This is a prelude to war. And it's something that I think we have an obligation to do everything in our power to resist. And resistance means education. And the antithesis of politics is economics. So education and economics is why we're here and it's why you're here. And hopefully it's why we'll be here for the next 35 years. So thank you very much. Thank you.


Okay, so first of all thank you all for coming, really great turnout, it's fantastic. This is a talk about BBC Store, which is how that was built on Drupal and why it was built on Drupal and some of the kind of challenges that we had along the way and it's basically a guide to how organisations of the kind of size of the BBC go about making the decision to use something like Drupal, why they use it, what the strengths and weaknesses are for them and hopefully it will give you a bit of an understanding of what Drupal can offer in that kind of enterprise environment. First of all, just a little bit about me, I'm the CTO of Fluxus which is an enterprise Drupal consultancy. I've been a Drupal developer for 10 years, or 10 years and four months according to Drupal.org and this is me when I was starting out as a Drupal developer and I had substantially more hair than I do now, so you can kind of get the idea of this is what 10 years of Drupal developer does to you, it definitely does help. So just a little bit about Fluxus, just so you know who we are and what we do, we work on projects that are mission critical, so these are things that need to be kind of highly reliable, they need to scale, they need to work well under high levels of load, and they need things like disaster recovery and monitoring and so forth, they're integration oriented so this is kind of systems where you've got Drupal but you've got a whole bunch of other components as well, so you might have other services, some of the stuff that for instance Clifton was talking about in the keynote this morning, where you've got Drupal but you've also got a microservice architecture alongside that, you might have APIs provided by those services that Drupal is consuming, or you might have APIs provided out of Drupal that other services can consume, and also high volume transactional, so this is large sites where you're going to see a lot of transactional requests, so by transactional here, this means in two senses, one is financial transactions, people are buying things, and the other sense is that you can't get away with just cashing the entire site, you've actually got to have the ability to serve requests where people are going to expect to see custom responses coming back that are personalized to them. What is BBC Store? So hands up for anybody who's used or seen BBC Store so far. Okay, that's actually really good. I was terrified everyone was going to say they've never heard of it, it was a complete waste of time. So it's a transactional video on demand store, and what that means is you go on and you buy access to videos. It's really, really simple. This is as distinct from something like Netflix where you purchase the subscription and you can then watch pretty much as much as you want. This is transactional, so think of it as being, somebody wants to describe it as digital DVDs, which shows they don't know what the first D in DVD means. That is basically what it is. You can buy individual episodes, you can buy series, you can buy collections, and there's lots and lots of different kinds of products, many different products, many different prices, promotions, coupons, discounts, bundles, all that kind of stuff. It's got a lot in common with a traditional e-commerce store. It's on the web, but it also has mobile applications, so there's iOS and Android mobile applications. There's also Windows 10 application, which runs both on desktop and mobile, and there's also desktop Windows and OS X applications, which you can use to download content to watch offline. It's integrated into iPlayer, so if you have the experience of seeing something on iPlayer and you don't watch it at the time and then you come back a few weeks later, it's not there anymore, you can actually now go through to BBC Store and purchase that. That integration allows you to go through to BBC Store, buy the content you want to watch, and then come back to iPlayer and watch it in iPlayer. It has 50 years of archive content, so the stuff they're going back to the 1960s, very, very early, Dr. Who and things like that, there's a whole bunch of content there that either has never been available before to buy, so it just predates the VHS video cassette, predates DVDs, or it's long-tailed content. No one ever really saw a point in putting Series 4 of Bargain Hunt on a DVD, because frankly, no one's going to buy that. It's not worth taking up the shelf space in an HMV, but on the web, there's no reason not to do that. Just an example of some of the content that you see on there. You've got Dr. Who, and again, one of the big selling points is you've got the complete back catalog, every single series, every single episode. As far as I know, I'm not a Dr. Who expert, so basically, we have no wrong about that, but it's not okay. But it's got most of the content, most of it is there. You've got things like Top Gear as well. The less said about that, the best of these days. There's that anti-trude show, so that's a good example of, again, long-tailed content. This is a show that's been running for, I don't know, 25 years, something like that. It's been running for a very long time anyway. Again, no one's going to go out and buy that on a DVD. It's not worth taking up the shelf space if you're going to take up space in W.H. Smith's or HMV, but on the web, it makes sense. You've got that one episode where your auntie was in it and she brought a clock along and it was worth £10 or something. That kind of thing. You can kind of see that if you really want it. Another interesting example is this. Would anybody be able to tell me what this is from that picture? I appreciate the picture at its distance. It's not correct. Sheffield. So that's actually a show called Threads, which broadcasted in 1984. It was a BAFTA award-winning, kind of short film basically, set in a post-apocalyptic, post-nuclear war in Britain. It's obviously an early alternative. We're worried about nuclear war with the Soviet Union. These days, nobody kind of tends to worry about that very much, but this is like an award-winning content. This is a really, really good film. It's one of the surprise hits in the first week after the site went live. What we discovered was that people actually, there was this pent-up demand. People really, really wanted to watch it and they had been able to get hold of it for years. So it was actually one of the top-selling items, which nobody would have predicted beforehand. Unfortunately not. There isn't very much in the way of sport. There might be the old kind of highlight compilation thing like that, but sports generally, just due to rights, management and so on, is different. You can get that on iPlayer, but I don't believe you can buy it. But in general, it does keep up to date with things that have just broadcasted. So you can go and buy something that was on TV last night. Obviously that stuff will still be available on iPlayer for free in general, but it keeps up to the minute with what's broadcasting. There's a question that probably people here are more interested in is, is why Drupal? Why would you build something like this on Drupal, given the alternatives that exist? A big reason is actually there's a history of doing Drupal at BBC Worldwide. So they've had previous success with your food and with Tokya. And there's quite a few people here who've worked on those sites at various points. They're quite big. Good food is one of the biggest sites in its market in the world. Tokya are also very, very successful. That was re-platformed on Drupal last year and has kind of all the revenue figures and so on have really gone up from that. It's been a very successful re-platforming. So the BBC already knew the platform. They already knew how to host it. They knew the operational side of things. They knew how to how the editorial kind of things worked. And they were confident that they could get a good result from it. The other big selling point is the community. So, you know, people like everybody in this room. This is a picture of Drupalcom Barcelona. I'm in there somewhere. I think I'm over there, but I can't pick myself out. And the community is really, really, you know, it's one of the big selling points of Drupal, the fact that you can come to an event like this. So I think, lastly, a BBC world order actually sponsors a Drupal camp because they know they can come here and they can talk to Drupal developers. They can find out what everybody's up to, what's going on. They can look for people that they might want to hire. They can look for ideas about, you know, new up-and-coming solutions. And they're not tied into, you know, maybe a bender that might go bust or something like that. The Drupal community is not going to go bust. Collectively, individual companies may come and go. Individuals may leave and join the community. But it's a self-refreshing, self-reflection kind of source of people who can do really useful things with Drupal. So it's an amazing talent pool, you know. So for every person like me who's been doing this for 10 years, there's new people coming to this kind of event. It's their first Drupal camp. I think there's always a lot more that we could be doing, and we could be doing a lot more on diversity, on outreach to people who maybe aren't getting the opportunities at the moment. But there's definitely, you know, a really vibrant talent pool already. And that gives you access to many suppliers.  You've got the systems integrators that kind of cap Geminiers and so on. You've got digital agencies doing Drupal. You've got Drupal-specific agencies. You've got consultancies. And, you know, all the way down to independent contractors, there's a large pool of those, and, you know, niche consultants who just maybe focus on one specific area. So whatever you need, the Drupal community kind of supplies a full range of different options. And it's also open source. So this kind of goes back to one of the points that Cliff then was making in his keynote this morning as well. That you often face this question when you're building, or when you're looking at your software options internally within an organization, which is build versus buy. So if a 99.9% of your decision is going to make, you're going to buy because you're not going to build your own word processor, you're not going to build your own spreadsheet, or you're not going to build your own email solution. But when you're trying to put a product out there in the marketplace, this becomes a really live question. Do we buy an off-the-shelf solution that, you know, supposedly already does video, and it kind of does some of the features that we want, or do you build something? And if you're going to build something, do you build from scratch? And obviously the problem that you would have if you're doing that is building from scratch really involves doing an awful lot of work. You know, an awful lot of things that you need to think about that the Drupal community has basically already thought about. You know, we've already kind of had these, whether it's security issues, whether it's usability issues, whether it's, you know, key features, out there on Drupal Core and Drupal Contra, it's like the embodied efforts of thousands of people over many millions of days of effort to create something that kind of already does a lot of those things. So you get to kind of have a little bit of the best of both worlds. You get all the benefit that you get from buying in a solution, which is that there's a lot of pre-built functionality and features that are ready for you. But you also get the advantages of build, which is that you can customize.  You can integrate it with the services you want to integrate it with. You're not being told, oh no, that's not going to be ready until next February by your vendor. Or if you really want that, it's going to cost you an absolute fortune in professional services fees, which is generally what tends to happen. And I think where this is important for companies that are looking to launch products is that a lot of the functionality that you need is kind of below the surface. A lot of the stuff that you need is not immediately visible. So to your customers, the bit that they can see is the bit that's above the waterline. They can see the bit that's the top of the iceberg. And that's the bit they're going to interact with. That's what they're going to click on to buy things. They don't really care about where any of this other stuff comes from. So what Drupal does actually that's really, really powerful is it takes away the need to think about, wow, how are we going to build an Editorial UI? Maybe we should try that new JavaScript framework for building an Editorial UI.  Drupal kind of, by being opinionated, it gives you a lot of that stuff that's the bottom half, well, the bottom 80% of the iceberg. Kind of already there, and you can focus as a product manager, as a business, whatever it might be, on the stuff that kind of really matters to your customers, which is the front-end user experience, the business model, the pricing, getting the right content out there. You know, people aren't going to go to buy something from BBC Store because it's built on Drupal. They're going to go because it's got really great content. And what Drupal does is it just enables you to get that out there so much quicker. So just a very, very quick kind of summary of some of the things that we've benefited from as a result of Drupal. You know, this is probably way too small for anybody to read, so apologies for that.  The ability to search content, again, Soldiers is really well supported. There's a whole bunch of stuff they search API and so on that makes it really easy to do. You want to edit the content? Okay, well, you've got an editorial UI straight away, you've got the permissions and roles, you can create users. With some really basic contrib stuff, you can actually have a proper controlled workflow with permissions and so on. You want to create content or curate content. You've got things like entity references, you can link different bits of content together, you want to put together a custom home page or a custom landing page. It's really easy to pull in different bits of content from across the site to do that. One of the things I think is really, really important is actually the ability to model the data. So when you think about what something like a BBC Store has, they have this concept of a brand, something like Doctor Who, and then under the brand they have series and each series can contain episodes and the brand might also contain collections and the collections might contain some of the series and some of the episodes and it gets quite complicated. But what Drupal gives you is this kind of ability to really plug things together. Okay, so I want a brand that contains a series. Well, so that's an entity reference from the brand to each of the series that's contained within it. And it just speeds up that process of being able to work out what those relations are and put them into the system compared to I don't know, going away and doing massive database diagrams and all this kind of stuff, which is very, very practical and pragmatic. Also gives you tools to help migrate the data. So getting the data into Drupal, the stuff that appears on BBC Store doesn't come from someone sitting there typing it all in. This comes out of a backend data store and is migrated into Drupal on a regular basis. And this ties in with the data modeling, you know, maybe you need to take the data in the backend and change it a little bit. One particular example was with BBC Store was that they had this concept in the backend of something called a miniseries. And this is basically who were, you might have a six episode series, broadcast three years ago. And what they did at the time is they put three episodes out in the spring and three episodes out in the autumn. And so as far as the backend is concerned, this is like, you know, separate miniseries. But if I wanted to come along and buy that now, I'd want to buy that as a single series. So the migration kind of functionality gives you that opportunity to do some data transformation and kind of bridge the gap between the data model at your backend as the data model you actually want to show to your customers and kind of manage that process of keeping everything in sync. What modules do you use for migration? They're custom migration modules. You'd probably be better off speaking to this gentleman here because he actually wrote them. But yeah, the gist is basically we migrate everything into staging tables in the database first. And then from those database tables, we actually then do the sort of normal Drupal migrate. So the actual Drupal migrate bit is incredibly straightforward because it's just from database tables into nodes. And then the, yeah, I'd say this guy here. No worries. Drupal also gives you tools for serving APIs, which is really, really useful, particularly when you've got mobile clients or you've got other backend systems that need to talk to your systems. So for instance, I mentioned the iPlayer integration. One of the things that iPlayer needs to do is it needs to know, I've got this piece of content. Is this actually available for sale on BBC Store? So that calls out to BBC Store to find out, is this piece of content actually available? And that ultimately goes through to Drupal to kind of say like what is the status of this piece of content right now? Is it available for sale or not? And then I think a big thing that people kind of underestimate the importance of, in particular under a script, what Drupal gives you is security. So just the things like cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery, form validations, bug protection, all of this kind of stuff that's kind of built into Drupal. If you wanted to build your own front end, you'd have to do all of that kind of legwork yourself. So it's a really powerful kind of option to have that stuff built in. The problem is that when you start to talk about these kinds of things with certain kinds of people, you get an objection that comes up. And I think it's not an unreasonable objection as such. And Clifton again touched on it this morning, which is why is this system doing all of these things? Shouldn't we be breaking this out a bit? Isn't it a bit dangerous to have these things in one place? I would say essentially there is a trade-off. Microservices are great and there are microservices in this architecture that are outside of the scope of what Drupal is doing. But the idea that you should break everything into microservices straightaway, make that your first priority, I think, is in this state. I think you can learn from what needs to be a microservice and what doesn't. And I think one of the things that Drupal is really, really good at is it just gives you this integrated solution. So if you've got APIs going out to the mobile clients that gives them listings of content and then you say, I want to add ratings. I want to allow people to rate that content. I want to allow people to say, out of five, how good did I think this was? In Drupal, that's the voting API module and the five-star module. And almost straightaway, those fields are available to the views. They start appearing in your JSON data. They start, you know, they can appear in your UI really, really easily. And you've done almost no kind of development effort at that point. Whereas if you start to think about doing this as a set of different microservices, you're going to have to do a lot of legwork to get to that point. And I think when you're doing product development, you don't want to put in a lot of that effort if you don't know if people are going to use it. So Drupal makes it really easy to kind of put stuff out there into the product where people can start interacting with it. I'm going to come on to that issue now, actually. This is kind of the timeline of how BBC Store was developed. So began work in late 2014. A couple of months before I came onto the project, I think. And the goal was really to get this to the point, well, we can start the trial. The trial was the bit where you actually start putting it in front of real users. You observe, is anybody going to buy anything? You know, what do they find good? What do they find bad? What do they like? And I could say with a reasonable degree of confidence that there was no way to have hit those dates without using Drupal, because it just gave you so many pieces of the jigsaw all at once that enabled you to stand up something that people could use. And some of the bits that went out in that original version weren't very rough and needed to be refactored later, but it enabled you to get the user experience out there so that people could start interacting with it and you can start learning from it. By June 2015, we moved out of the trial phase into the private beta phase, at which point you start to get real money transactions going through the system. So people are actually buying real stuff, real credit cards. Then I moved onto an applicant beta phase so that people could actually apply to join and take part. And then launch in November of last year. So all told, around about a year from starting development. But if you think about it, probably two-thirds of that time is actually spent with a publicly accessible version of the site running that people could interact with, that people could try out. And that meant that we could do things like re-factoring the purchase flow when we discovered that people were finding that confusing. And that we could optimize some of the stuff like the migration routines that I mentioned before. Originally I think that it could take up to 30 or 40 minutes for something to appear on the site. By the end it was generally two or three minutes, maximum of 10. And most of that time was how long did it take Akamai to purge the cache. By way of technical remarks, I think there were a few areas of the build that I think were particularly interesting. These aren't necessarily the bits that went well or went badly, but just the things that I think were particularly interesting. One was personalization. And this is a really live topic I think for Drupal at the moment. So this is a Drupal 7 site. One of the things that I didn't go to the presentation this morning, but there was a presentation about BigPipe or BankPipe, as it was described. And what BigPipe does is that enables you to serve the non-personalized portion of a page first and then can stream the personalized bits to the browser after that initial page load has taken place. Drupal 7, you don't have that capability. So as you're browsing around the site, you're going to see a whole bunch of things for sale. If you've already bought that, it should say play me, rather than buy me. And the way that we actually achieved this was basically using JavaScript. So the entire site, in terms of the catalog pages, is completely cached. The purchase flow, the account management areas, the playback areas, they're not cached. But the catalog basically is. And we found that was a reasonable compromise between performance and technical elegance and kind of maintaining the cacheability of the content, which was really important. I'm very much looking forward to Drupal 8 and to BigPipe to see what we can do differently there, because I think rather than having to build our own solution for querying the back-end APIs out of JavaScript and updating the bits of the page, it would be really nice if that was actually integrated directly into Drupal. Frontend JavaScript was also an interesting experience. I imagine this is something that a lot of people have been through, but we went through quite a number of significant JavaScript pre-factors before we got to launch. The thing started out as very much an AngularJS project by the end. It was a backbone project with a tiny little bit of AngularJS, I think left somewhere. Meanwhile, I was advocating for React the whole time and nobody listened to me, but this was a really kind of interesting example of, at times, it felt like refactoring for refactoring sake and trying out new technology for trying out new technology sake. But where we got to at the end is we realized we didn't need that much JavaScript. We needed it to do some very specific jobs. Backbone was fine. It's really really simple. It's easy to understand. It doesn't take over your whole approach to how you build your pages and all of those kinds of things. I think that's interesting in the context of the conversation about decoupling Drupal and how we're going to build frontend frameworks that work well with Drupal. What we found was actually keeping it quite minimal and having the frontend framework not make too many assumptions about what Drupal was going to do and not have Drupal make too many assumptions about what the frontend framework needs was actually the right way to go for us. I'd be really interested to talk to anybody who has a different experience and how they maybe had more of an enjoyable experience with something like Angular, which really does try to take over the whole thing. We also had feature plaques, which again, this is something that was mentioned in the keynote early today. Our feature plaques enabled us to do much more of a continuous delivery style deployment. Everybody's familiar with the idea that in Drupal you can turn a module on and off and you can set configuration variables. What we did with feature plaques was we basically kind of, as a principle, we kind of said, just deploying the code should not cause or certainly should not always cause new functionality to become available. If we wanted to add a new payment method, let's say we wanted to add PayPal as a payment method. We want to be able to push that code out. We want to know that that code's there, that all of the kind of deployments that related to that have been done, but we might not want to turn it on on a Friday afternoon. We might want to wait until Monday morning. That might be because there's a marketing activity associated with it. It might be an email needs to go out at that time, whatever it is. By using feature plaques, we were able to decouple the deployment of a feature from the release of a feature. That actually worked really well on several occasions. What we probably should have done, what we didn't do, was release any of that as open source, but I think that's something that should come out in the future really. Finally, the thing that I found really interesting, which almost nobody else will, was the rights management aspect of this. It's such a really, really interesting, really, really complicated data modeling thing that Drupal really helped with. In order to know whether or not a piece of content is available to buy, you need to know its license window, between what dates is this content actually available. You need to know it's an availability window, which is between which types of people are actually allowed to buy it, and does it have any valid products attached to it, and is it available on the CDN, and has anybody revoked this because it contains music that we don't have rights to, or it contains a reference to something that maybe is illegal, or has been a subject of court case, or whatever it might be, how much of a reason why something might need to be removed. Drupal actually really shone with this, because it enables you to manage those interrelations between content, such that a change on this episode ripples all the way up. If you can't buy that episode, you also can't buy the series that contains that episode, and you can't buy the collection that contains that series, so Drupal kind of really helped this out there, and again, I can't quite imagine the pain that would have been involved in trying to build something like that from scratch, so it's, well I can't imagine it, but I don't like it. So I think that hopefully, I'm not sure if I've rushed through this or not, I've been drinking this coffee which is a little faster than I wanted, but that basically gives you, I think, an overview of why we did what we did, why the UC wanted to use Drupal, some of the choices that we made in the course of doing that, and I'm conscious that this is the pre-lunch slot, and that if I overrun on time I'm going to be keeping people away from their lunches, and I was going to leave some time for questions, so I'm going to stop there, and if anybody would like to ask some questions, now is the time, I will take no offense if anybody would rather get to the front of the lunch queue. No, the short answer is, so the question was, is the payment actually done using Drupal commerce, and the brief answer is no. It was a very custom checkout workflow, a lot of the things that Drupal commerce would give you would be things like a shopping cart, which just isn't relevant in the context of one-off digital products, and as it happened, the payment provider that had been selected was not one that had a pre-existing Drupal commerce integration, so it was easier to just build a custom integration at that point. Okay, so the question is, how was the team scaled internally within the BBC? So I was a consultant to this project, so I wasn't running it, so I may be wrong about some of this, but essentially it kind of goes back to what I was talking about in the community slide, that there were actually different kind, different companies involved at different stages, so Hackware were involved very much early on, and they provided the hosting platform, and they're kind of bootstrapping the whole thing, and getting the initial direction set. We were involved kind of shortly afterwards to kind of provide more kind of architecture and a bit more, some more engineering capabilities in there as well, and in particular, my experience is working on similar products in the past, ITV and so on. The way that that scaled was pretty typical, I think you begin, I think with a heavy emphasis on contractors over time, that then transitioned into permanent staff coming on board, so by the end of, by the time it launched, I think there was four permanent developers on the team. A lot of that work was done by Alan McKenzie, actually who's the chief, who was the chief group of architect of BBC Worldwide, and he was here, I'm sure you've been seeing him if you were here last year, he was here very much in recruitment mode, trying to hire the people who eventually did join, so I think that's how they went about kind of scaring that team. There is too hiring, there is too hiring. Well, they are still, they're still hiring, so I think it's not, it's not my, it's not my job to be here as a recruiter for the BBC, but definitely I'm sure there's people here who will be able to point you in the direction. Yeah. You touched on the rights mentioned, was that a module again or how it helps you with that? So that was a module, it was a custom module, which basically would, on modification of a node, so using node hooks, it would basically look at what data had changed on that node if it was relevant to the rights management aspect, so if the is revoked flag had been set on an episode, that means something's changed, and it would then work out which products are affected and update, essentially update all of the affected products for that change, so it's kind of really using Drupal's node system and hook system to manage that. So in terms of contributed modules that were used in this project, did the BBC contribute? There were, there were definitely patches contributed back, I don't think there were any whole modules contributed, but there were definitely patches, I definitely contributed. To be honest, so the question is which of the major contributed modules were used, to be honest it's the ones you would expect, it's views, it's search API, it's work bench, showing all the first kind of things, panels as well, was in the mix. Thank you, thank you. In regards to feature flags, do you have any issues around the creep of that as in where you're getting multiple feature flags going on, or when you want something this late and maybe you want to change the date on you have that in the more states of that sound, around the same feature but slightly more configuration? So the question is, with relation to feature flags, did we find that we had a problem with having too many feature flags or just that kind of creeping into the point where you've got so many different options for configuring how feature works that it becomes difficult to manage? Basically what we did was we would have regular calls of feature flags, so if a feature flag was on in production, you don't need that anymore. At that point, once the feature is on and live in production and maybe you give it a week or so to be sure that you're not going to take it off again, you can pretty safely remove that feature flag, so it's not intended to be a system for configuring the site once it's live, it's to allow you to deploy the code without the feature and automatically activate it. Do you find on the feature flag that you certainly need to have things in sync with the app store because the amount of leads hanging on to the app store, is it useful for that? Not in my experience, so the question is did we have a problem keeping feature flags in sync with the app store, or in sync with the features in the app? I never encountered that. I could imagine how that could be a problem, but again I think part of the things, one of the things you might want to do is actually roll the feature out on the web behind the feature flag, try it out on the web and then find out if anybody really wants to use it, before you go ahead and build the matching mobile app feature and so on and so forth, so I used the example before ratings and reviews, you know if you wanted to push out ratings and reviews, you might be better off just doing that on the web, and if you discover that everybody's giving everything two-star reviews and it's a real disaster and you don't want that, or you discover that nobody uses it at all, then you've actually saved yourself a lot of money because you haven't built the mobile app versions at that point and you can just say, actually it's a bad idea, let's not do it, and turn the feature flag off, and it disappears again. The tool is that the data is coming from the tracking system, they migrate our content to users, the content data to the target and actually using the report for content to be seen. Yeah, so what we had on a given node, there would be a set of fields that would be essentially mastered by this back-end system, this would include images, it might include the synopsis text, certainly include the price, but for some fields we basically had a second field which would come out of the override field, so you'd have the image override fields, so if you had specified an image override in Drupal that image would take precedence over the image that had come out of the back-end system, and we used field formatters, so that was essentially transparent to the theme layer, so it would pick the right image from the node and use that, and again I think we did the same thing in views as well, so it would just pick the right image, use the override image wherever possible. Anyone else? Cool, thank you very much. I don't know if they can help you Ah, I've been here. How do you know? It must be possible. It is. Cutting glasses. It's great to have you here. Thanks for asking me this. We have a good meeting. We're having someone come up here so you can all come talk to me. Hello. Why is that with a fracar with one of those images? I'm retreating like mad. The last one I've said I was a type of speaker. I'm trying to stay away from the fracar. Yeah, I don't know. It was cool in here when I came in and it filled up with people. I mistakenly left my jacket on. Can you believe it? It's been a great deal of meetings. So far. It's been a very long time. That should face me. It's a good system. Hey. Now I'm going to be so hard on the coffee. And you're going to have that. Did you breathe cold when I came in? I left my jacket on because I thought it was cold. It's lovely. And yeah, I don't think it's going to turn up. I don't know. I should remain by myself. Yeah, it'd be much easier for them to remember. Yeah. I probably... I haven't got any cold. No, I haven't got any. I went through in that gear. One, two, three, four, five. Two, three, four, five. Have you... You can't go to the jungle at all. No, I haven't seen that. He's over there. Oh, there it is. I haven't seen it. I haven't seen it. I haven't seen it. I didn't go into the traumatic memories. I haven't seen it. People don't need to know, all right? No. It's like a swamp. You know what I'm saying? A swamp is so serene and peaceful, but under the surface, they're paddling away on my muscles. Yeah. All right, I'll be all right. I'll be right back. I'm sorry. Yeah. Yes. Yeah. I didn't see that. I did see that. I didn't see that. I didn't see that. I did see that. I did see that. I think that was both of ourups. Yeah. So, what's the future?  I think the option to go out and do the house of it. I don't know. I don't understand. I don't understand. OK, so you can talk about... You can talk about... We're really... Like, when the point is... Ah! Yeah, yeah. You see, you're really... I didn't see that. I think you have to breathe. You must take a wash. You just can't... You're like, I can't... I'm not going to take that overshoot. It's going to take time. You going to... We know these are all problems. We're going to give us solutions. There's more problems. If we go off, by the BBC's infrastructure, by the BBC's team, by the BBC's work and... We'll be all right, OK. I've been mentioned talking to them a lot. This project has been shot, I didn't have a lot of time to do it, but I did have a bit of a go at it. It was a radical and basic style project. No, it was not a, it was not a, it was a, it was a small, it was a small thing. So, I don't know if it's nice as well. I don't know if it can happen. So, I'll look at all sorts of things. Well, can it go, can it feel like the time has passed or... It might be. I think when you're on a film, you look back on it. Do you want to think? Yes. That's the problem. I can just stop there. Yeah. There was, like, two crazy, like, great try-downs. Yeah. What about you? I don't know. I don't know. The old school has stuck up all the things that were called estimates for entry and there's a solid. There's a solid table. But wait, when you say it out loud, it's just completely insane. We add together all the estimates of stuff that we don't know enough about, and we're not going to do that yet. And then we figure that out. But then it comes out that how many times have you stacked all your estimates together? You actually did all those things that you estimated.  And you put out any scope. We asked Kit. He made you wait on it twice. Yeah. Did you do anything like that? I know what I was going to talk about. I'm not doing anything like that. We had a conversation about it. Yeah. It's helpful.    I wouldn't want that to come to Alan's. He gets a little bit of that. It's not that he does. And whenever I say this to you, what do you want to touch base on? I might say that conductor. So you're saying you're in exactly the same situation you were last year? I don't remember last time. We asked Alan to do that. I don't know if it's time now. I don't know if it's time now. I don't know if he has the option to do anything like that. Oh, no. The difference this time to the last year is that people might let all these things go. I don't know if you, I don't know if you're going to be able to do that. I don't know if that is the difference.  It's opposed to this time of year. That's where it's been set the goal of value. And it's like, do you want to progress on it? Right. I was late, and then I was going to go to the area where we were going. I was going to go to the area where we were going. And then I was going to go to the area where we were going. Nothing, nothing more than that. I was going to go to the area where I was going. Nothing worked. You're the first person I met who asked me to work with. Well, it's kind of been this time. It's amazing how they have the best of all the knowledge. I was trying to get it. I was trying to get it. It's good as far as the base. And then I was like, do you deny our project managers? True. Do you know what I'm saying? Do you know what I'm saying? What, yeah. We can't just make it. I can't just go there but not on the front side. I can't just go there. I can't just go there. I can't just go there. I can't just go there. I can't just go there. Do you know what I'm saying? No, I don't. I don't. I don't. So you got a team, and then she's programmed a few things? And then you got somebody that level? We're going to find out all the data we have about the cops. Look, there's two don't believe any QA.  Who ran off from the event meals. Which was? Of course that's something you go by selling on sale. You've got to take each one out of the hell out of them. If he actually gets to very old school, very risk of us, he probably can sell them all.


What is going on guys? It's your boy dpj here today with another Destiny video. Now over the past few days we've seen a few bits and bobs in regards to the Rise of Iron DLC and what it could indeed be. So what were these bits and bobs I am talking about? First off it came to light that Rise of Iron has been trademarked by Bungie. Nothing had or known yet it was bound to happen. What is interesting though is the Rise of Iron description reads that it's an interactive game software. What's weird is that previous DLC expansions The Taken King Dark Below and the House of Wolves were all labelled as downloadable video games. So what does this mean? Well let's take a look at other trademark things which fall under the category of interactive game software. Well the main one I could find was the Eververse Trading Coal which you can see on screen now. So how could these things be alike?  One thing I have noticed though is that Crimson Doubles, Spiral Racing League, these three live events are not trademarked or as I could find anyway. Only what we pay for is trademarked pushing me to the conclusion that this Rise of Iron is a paid for DLC. I could be wrong but that's just what I think. The next bit of news we got, well it's not really news as such but it's an interesting point which I'm gonna cover. Federal Destiny Player, YouTuber and streamer Gathalion posted this image on Twitter and it shows a paid ad for the Rise of Iron owned by Bungee. What's really interesting here is while it states Destiny, Rise of Iron, New Story, Raid, Gear and Weapons discover the fate of the Iron Lords. Now there's no factual evidence that this image is legit and it seems as though the ad has been removed.  New Raid, Gear, Weapons and even more epic, New Story. Discover the fate of the Iron Lords. Now I said this in a video a few weeks back when we got that first image of the Rise of Iron. It was speculated at the time that we would witness the Battle of the Twilight Gap and I absolutely love the idea but at the time I couldn't really see Bungee taking that route. Well if this is legit then it seems to be the case which is absolutely amazing. Now moving on, now this image being official and it was tweeted out by Bungee and it's to basically further more publicise the upcoming stream on June 9th this Thursday where we get to witness our next Destiny adventure which should be great. The image clearly shows the logo separated by snow and soil. This more so ties into what we saw with the first Rise of Iron poster where we saw snow and wolves but other than that it don't really offer much more but it's really going to be quite epic to find out what they have in store for us via the stream this Thursday so make sure you tune in. If any new info drops before the stream this Thursday you'll be sure to find it here on my channel so subscribe if you're new but guys if you have any theories on the info I covered in the video please show it down below in the comments section. Thanks for stopping by as always do drop a like I'd appreciate the support and I'll catch you guys on that next one.


Native English Speaker In relation to teaching the English language, the term Native English Speaker is normally used to refer to someone whose first language is English. That means they have used English as their main form of communication since birth. In this context, first language, mother tongue and native language are terms that can be used to mean the same thing, so they are often used interchangeably. If a person grows up in an environment where both parents speak different languages, it is possible for them to have two mother tongues. Generally, a child will pick up a considerable amount of their first language knowledge before they begin any formal schooling. In contrast, the acquisition of a second language usually requires the aid of some kind of language instruction.