Okay, and now we're recording I see I see it. It says the record on it pretty cool, right? Yeah Okay, so Yeah, just you want to kind of let me know What's up with you and why you? Contact me or do you want to meet to ask you questions? Well, I can give you a little bit of information first and if there's some things that could clear you can ask questions so well, I I'm building my own coaching business and Right now what's going on is I have a funnel that I like a webinar funnel and I bring people to have coaching call with me Like what we're having right now After after the webinar After the webinar. Yeah, so they watch a webinar from your website They sign up for it and then yeah And then they get on the coaching call exactly and After the coaching call I offer them my services and this is the strategy that I have but Like something is not working with it with this the strategy. I know like a lot of people use that strategy But it's not like like like who? Well clients you don't know if you know the company clients on clients on demand Or Russ Raffino No, not so much. Okay. Well, it's a business that teach coach is how to make money And this is a strategy they use and it's it's also the strategy and they show to people and Library of their student they do it. They make a lot of money and it works So I don't know what's missing in that that system. Are you are you familiar with the concept of a value ladder?  It means that when you give me something good I want to give you back and I trust you more so you so I can make bigger deals with you and Obviously the whole idea is that you start Let's say you want somebody to give you something if it's something small then you can just start by asking but if it's something For example email like if you want to get somebody's email, you don't really need to You know go crazy with it. You just need to ask them for the email and usually a squeeze page Should get about 30 40 percent conversions Because you know if you have a good squeeze page, it's just an email to people are comfortable giving it now If you want to start asking for money You want to start giving value first so the whole Genius part of reciprocity and they've been doing this Even before the Bible times I imagine like a tribe Two tribes of people and they don't trust each other. So Usually what would happen is the two tribes would fight and they kill each other and you know, whoever wins gets to keep the food of the other tribe so how Sharing started is imagine one tribe Was like, okay. Maybe we don't have to fight them Maybe we can just try something out and so they took a bit of food and They put it next to the other tribe, you know Just somewhere in between so the other tribe can see it and then the other tribe came over They saw the food. They're like, okay. This looks good. We got this for free We better put something to so that they won't be mad at us and Then they put something of value and then the cycle grows until maybe two years later. They feel comfortable to Simply be face-to-face without killing each other But this it started by somebody giving something away At the start which is something that you clearly understand because you do You know, you do videos and you produce content and you did create a webinar, but problem that a lot of people face when they Learn about the whole reciprocity thing is They don't have a good assessment of how much giving is actually too much giving and there's it's true that there's no such thing as too much giving but if you give to to get something so you're giving to For the purpose of getting somebody to sign them for a coaching call or to buy your products then you need to give just enough in the right places and A coaching call is a gift. So I'm guessing you're not charging money for that coaching call, right? No, I'm not So your your logic is basically flawed here because you're like I'm gonna give them free videos and The and once they enjoy the videos enough the purposes that they Sign up for a free webinar and once they join the free webinar Which is even more value I'm gonna give them even more free value by coaching them for free or for once in like one session for free and Then I want them to pay me so you put it actually Instead of making the process work faster it actually makes the process work slower because You're playing for the long run. You're actually supposed to be playing for the short run so instead of being like Making a video and then you know, and I watched a couple of your videos and I kind of skimmed through them and maybe maybe It's because I haven't noticed but I haven't seen you anywhere tell people like click this link and book a Free coaching call with me and even even worse like I haven't even seen you Say click here to book the webinar or Whoever that works So what I would do If I were you is I would completely cut away the webinar part Because it's way too much effort. It's way too much effort. It's too much investment You know if you were asking them at the end of the webinar To buy a thousand dollar product That would make sense because you've built them up over time but you're basically building them up to give them something for free again and What happens is if you look, you know, you look at your funnel like a series of steps and each step You filters out people and then you lose people hit on this step and they lose more people on this step Obviously you try to you know have as many as possible, but you never have a hundred percent So every step Gives people another obstacle To the goal. So if your goal is to coach people one-on-one The value that you want to be giving them Should be as close to the actual product as possible. So if the product or service is coaching people What's gonna make people want to work with you and pay a lot of money to get coached is Get it is the demonstration of your coaching. It's not your videos or your webinar Okay, so the whole purpose of the videos you make Are to entice people Because they like your personality and they like your thinking and they want to be like you is To entice them to go on a free coaching call with you and then on the coaching call you drop a massive bomb of value a Good coaching call for me Takes could take anywhere from an hour to three hours and sometimes I do a two or three hour coaching call and I'd be so Into that person I'd be like I tell them look I'm not even completely sure that I want to work together But I want to I want to just to make sure I do another quick coaching call with you And let me tell you every single person that I've said that to like hey I'm gonna do another free coaching call with you just to make sure that it's a right fit But and you know how much it costs and it's $2,000 for a month, right? You're you know that and it's okay with you Okay, so I'm gonna give you another free coaching call Just gonna make sure because on make sure it's a perfect fit every single person that I've said that to Became a client of mine Okay For either two thousand or three thousand dollars Like without effort without trying just the most normal logical thing ever Okay so Again the whole demo the whole purpose of giving you value is to give value proportionate to The actual product or service you're selling So if I want to sell you my coaching, I'm gonna demonstrate you my coaching You know if I want to sell you Uh a cake I'm gonna let you taste the cake. I'm not gonna tell you how I made the cake Yeah Right the proof is in the pudding so This is where you're missing it is you're pulling people on this huge roller coaster of Way too much Just gibber dabbing and going here and learning this and learning that but But again, it might be a good idea if your purpose is to sell a course or something But right now you just all you want to do is coach So that means that if you're making if you break it down from the end, you know to the beginning that means that However many coaching clients you get is based on how many people you actually coach on the phone for free So the more free coaching calls you do The more sales you're going to get And I I estimate When people use my quote-unquote like formula like when they You know find people who are who are interested who have the money Who they have a good rapport with Usually you should expect between 30 to 20 closing rates so about one in three or one in five Is going to become a client Disregarding financial difficulties. So I'm not saying okay. Maybe you know at the last moment. They couldn't pay. I'm saying people who could pay One in three one in five becomes a client. So all you need is Just to be on the safe side Five to seven coaching calls, you know because one or two people will probably not show up to the coaching call So all you need is like five to seven coaching calls with people who They came to you. So that means they Uh, you didn't contact them and ask them to give them a coaching session. They contacted you Because of your videos or maybe an ad you created And by the way, I really break this down in depth in my Uh free guide. So I have like a 70 page free guide where I basically uh The blueprint. Yeah the blueprint. Yeah, I I take everything I know and just put it there um That and that's really all that you're missing. So I would uh completely Put put aside the webinar even I don't say delete it but just Archive it or put it aside so you don't need it right now What you need to do is to increase Either the quality Or the quantity of your videos significantly So instead of posting A video every two three days try video try posting two videos every day or Even more like I used to post five videos a day And that was extremely prosperous Because let's say, you know, and I don't get that many views at the moment because it took a quite a long break And right now I get like 40 views per video on average But I make about two videos a day And that means that if you make If you get like 20 views per video and you make a video every two days And I get 40 let's say even the same. Let's say I make 20 get 20 views and I make two videos every day That means that in two days I got 80 views Then you only got 20 Now if you actually check the analytics You can actually see how many of your viewerships is from subscribers and how many how what percent is from Non-subscribed people. So for me about 75 percent of my views come from people who were not previously subscribed so that means that Out of those let's say 80 new views every two days Again assuming I make 20 views per video That means that 60 views are people who Are who don't know me Or are not fans yet And maybe out of those 60 40 50 are like new people because Sometimes the same people watch a few videos Yeah And and again, what's cool is I also get like a four minute average uh Viewed watch times that means that out of those uh 60 views The person sat sat on average for four minutes and watched my video. So he watched my face for four minutes Yeah, I I get that. Uh, well the the webinar, I think it I still think it's a good thing But not necessarily in the having the video first on youtube if I do an advertisement to the webinar, maybe but I get that the The idea of the webinar it's having the person already see some of my my coaching my stuff what I can What I can give to them and youtube does that Instead of the webinar You know your your free coaching call does that That's what I'm saying is You don't need to show them how your Coaching is because you're gonna coach them Yeah, well, I mean the video Tell them like like who I am they they make them aware of who I am Yeah, that's that's another thing that I Wanted to specifically talk to you about so again the first point is um Focus on the the the actual coaching call and put a link on top of every single video you make Like click here to book a free coaching call make the process as easy as possible as smooth as possible I recommend Calendly the one that I use but you can use any Like booking Service already have this Yeah, and ask people not only at the end but even at the start Before you start the video like look if you're interested in a coaching call Click the link below to register for a free coaching call Like just even start the video like that and then start the video actually the topic of the video Again, the whole point is to get them on the coaching call the more coaching calls you get The more money you make And it's actually exponential because the more people I found it to be really cool that When you have more coaching clients, especially high paying coaching clients You can afford a lot more Marketing a lot more advertising and just in general you get this sort of a good karma where people are always talking about you Because you're doing so much good in their life So that really helps And again, the second point that I wanted to discuss with you is the Way you currently make your videos Uh, if if I'll be kind of blunt, I find it very kind of like stale and a bit boring Like There's not The videos are very theoretical The way that I see them like it's uh Uh It's like talking about a thing, but it's not talking to the thing So it feels like instead of Talking instead of coaching it feels more like you're educating Can you do you know the can you spot the difference? Yeah So I think that that's a big reason why It's less immediately apparent that people should contact you for coaching because when When you see someone on video and he's educating you But It it doesn't feel like he's talking to you about something that you should do now It feels more like he's talking to you about a concept And there's no you don't feel like he's calling you to action you don't feel like you don't feel that fire That says do this Then it's it's a lot harder to relate to that person in terms of Oh, I can see that if I go on a call of this person.  Um First of all a lot more try putting in a lot more emotions Okay, putting emotions would definitely help like any emotion.  You don't get happy. You don't get Angry is just You talking about a subject So emotes basically use a lot more emotions And also use a lot more calls to action. So And before you make each video You should have a checklist with three things. So first thing is Did I uh Call people to sign up to to book a free coaching call at the beginning and the end of the video That's the first thing you need to do That's the most important because that's going to put you in a mindset that you're coaching Not that you're just talking about something Because you realize that after you like hey go on a coaching call click here Like you're not just going to be educating people. They're going to be judging you from the perspective of a coach And secondly, uh find an emotion like The second thing on the checklist is choose an emotion That you would like to emote during the The video so maybe it makes you angry. Maybe it makes you happy Maybe it's a couple of things but but Get people excited in any way just get them to Feel it By by feeling it yourself That's how you do it and thirdly Is make sure you have at least two or three Calls to action in the video regarding the topic itself.  It's basically sterile like Before you watch the video and after you watch the video Nothing changed and even when you read a book You can feel the emotion when the author is talking about the subject And usually there's also calls to action if it's a self-developing book So You push people to that So make sure that every video you make you have at least two three things ahead of time That you know that they should do with what you just taught them And and and and be you know, some people like to guide in a very gentle way Some people like to guide I like to guide very firmly like in very decisive and sometimes a bit aggressive sometimes enlightening way Whatever fits you but you have to do that you have to actually Have that power you push people to do things Okay, so it's like, okay, I taught you now now. Here's what you do with what I taught you So if you check out any single video that I make Any any video that I made in the last Since I ever opened my youtube channel You're going to find all these three elements. So the first element is It feels like I'm coaching you The second element is There's emotion And the third part the third element is I tell you what to do with what I just taught you Okay Okay, so this is uh in terms of the The videos Now how many coaching calls or how how often do you coach people at the moment? Um At the moment not at all. There's one call scheduled for tomorrow, but before that I I didn't had for Yeah, so so So that's by the way, that's that's the reason That you Come out as a bit sterile in the videos. It's exactly this reason. It's because you Are not in the habit of coaching people That it it sort of feels Um Like it's it's like when a guy who Hasn't been laid in a long time goes through a bar The girls can kind of sense it So When you coach people It's it's really something amazing that I noticed that When I coach some when I am actively coaching the videos I make are top notch. So Every coaching call I make I learned too and then I take what I learned and then I shoot it on the people and It's like coaching helps you organize the information in your head and then you take that concept and you shoot it out And it's so that's why it's so powerful because you cannot you can't reach it alone So because if you're coaching minded You cannot reach those high level concepts that make you so powerful Outside of a coaching call And what I recommend there is that You actually start contacting people And people that you know either you know I'm not saying like family or people that you know specifically not people that are like closed-minded but People that are open-minded and that like you And that look up to you to some extent And I'm sure you either Have these people right now or you or you don't didn't notice that you have that you had these people and contact them And just tell them hey, I I'd love to I'm currently like practicing doing coaching calls And I'd love to give you a free coaching call and that would be really cool if you could if you want to Do this with me and the reason for that is as a coach I this is what I noticed about myself But I noticed it applies to almost every other type of profession where people help other people The the main way you get new coaching clients It's not by marketing yourself necessarily Of course, you have to but but it's by actually coaching Um, because you want to look at activities like leverage activities So you like let's say you want to get big in the gym So everything matters, but you want to ask yourself. What's the thing that matters the most like what's the one thing that if I just do that Everything else will fall in place and I'm not saying if I only do that and nothing else I mean that if I do it, I'll also be motivated to do everything else So for me, for example, what I noticed in the gym is the when I do A lot of heavy compound exercises, you know, the ones that really tear up all your body apart Like deadlifts and squats Everything gets fixed. It's really cool. Like I just I I eat better. I sleep better I I'm more focused. I do my workouts better. I have more motivation So I found that's my like leverage activity in the gym. So if I just do that Everything else falls in place and with coaching If you just coach everything else falls in place. So the more you coach people The more people will want you to coach them the more you you want to be inclined to make more videos because you have a lot more to talk about The videos will be much better You're going to be more confident. So it's it's simply an upward spiral For me again coaching people and making videos. That's all I need to do And I noticed that I noticed that if I just do those two Everything falls in place And for me specifically, it's actually the videos that are the main thing Because I'm already coaching minded also already since age 16. I coached like over a thousand people probably So I'm I'm so used to coaching that I just need to make videos and people will understand already See me like a coach. They already kind of that's the way I communicate. So I already will get people that want to work with me but if you're not yet in that communicative habit you don't Know how that feels yet how that feels when you coach someone you just Kick their ass in the best way Then Then you also need to coach people so that means Coach people at any price like I don't mean like for for Small amount of money what I mean is do whatever it takes to always be coaching so at least Three times a week maybe four times a week Make sure you have a coat three four coaching calls Because that's going to keep you warmed up that's going to keep you in shape and Again, it can be even your friends. It can be just strangers people. You don't know so well Anyone doesn't matter even for free as long as you get the chance where somebody Tells you their problems tells you their situation and you help them fix it But but like but that's but it's agreed that they that that's what happens not like Okay, maybe I'll tell you my problem.  Click the link below book a coaching called You know just just be be aggressive about it because you're trying to push something for free That you believe in Yeah, that's true and and and I don't like it that I That that's that's that kind of pissed me off when I watched your videos to be honest where you're so Nonchalant, you know, you know what nonchalant?  So it's it's clear As a coach and also I think most people see it that you're probably not getting coaching clients But but you're not asking And it really pissed me off when I watched it because I saw how much you upload you know and You upload every two days, which is it's not A lot but it's but the the consistency is really good So the fact that you keep uploading no matter what but the thing is if you're not going to start asking people aggressively like go on the coaching call at the beginning of the video in the middle at the end like go on a coaching call Come to a free coaching call with me.   I'm Mom and my kids are starving.   Yeah Does that make sense? Yeah, it makes sense Okay, um, I mean, I think that's pretty much everything that you need But I mean for solving that problem Uh, just do those three things again. The first thing is in the videos. The second thing is just on the Social level and the third thing is kind of on a mindset level um If you really adopt these actions And the mindset then um It's it's like a People are gonna respond because instead of being like Just making a video and hoping people get there. You actually ask people to get there So it's a lot more demanding But but in a very good way Yeah, it's true and um I only did this while telling people to either uh Like you have a call or go to my webinar when they they got out So like the first video order was the first time I got my webinar out. I said people I go to uh register to my webinar during the video, but I never kept going Yeah, yeah, I mean, um Yeah, that's another mistake is that when you just promote something when it comes out Only when it comes out. So if you actually look, uh, the reason I keep getting book sales for my autobiography is because I Almost every book I make almost every video I make I just go like Look, you're gonna see you want to know the full story behind that Uh thing I told you about you can actually watch it in my video Sorry, you can actually watch it in my autobiography Uh and the click the link is below So somebody, you know watches the video and he's like, oh, that's a cool story. I want to know the rest and he also got inspired by the By the video so he's much more inclined to actually go ahead and purchase that Yeah So, yeah, I mean it's look it really for me getting from um Not having coaching clients to the point where I was closing Probably like a thousand dollars. Yeah, even more almost two thousand dollars per client and closing Three four clients a month it it took almost no time because that's that's the It's like the basic like I'm not saying it's uh necessarily easy, but it is simple That's for sure. It's it's simple. So don't don't complicate it like All you need to do is get enough coaching calls with the right people Name your price at the end And if it's a if you really get did a good job and it's the right fit And they have the money They're gonna pay Yes, and maybe at the beginning you're gonna like crap your pants, you know when you ask people To give you, you know a thousand dollars or two thousand dollars for coaching By the way, I highly recommend that You You know if if you've been thinking of going below Let's say 750 a month I recommend that you jump straight to asking You know in like getting a package basically it and asking people for like Let's say 1500 for two months or something like that 2000 like make sure that the right from the beginning My criteria was always that I want to create a situation where I can close three four Coaching clients and just with that already you live like like you came So if if you have you know, I'm not just I'm not going to get into price right now If how much you want to charge or without charging but just just hear this out So if you work with three four people And that's still not enough to have you Traveling living abundantly having fun Not thinking about money And being able to promote yourself then you're not charging enough Yeah, and I don't know Which of your book you said that but I read it Cool Yeah, so so do you have any Um question or anything you else you need? um I think uh I I think I'm good with that With the call we had I will definitely make the the checklist that you you told me And post more people I you know, I'm coaching entrepreneurs and I know a lot of entrepreneurs So I'm sure I can find like Two three people that will say yes to have a couple of coaching probably um So that I will do this and then sell the the thing and uh And I I also during the call it may give me an idea to do advertisement I could do a video You know like as you told told me to do them And use that video as an advertisement and then bring the people to go to To the free coaching call Yeah, so what I would recommend is that at the beginning you start with just uh By the way, another really good way you can get uh coaching calls is by simply Messaging entrepreneurs or just people on facebook they're into self-development and Entrepreneurs and just literally just saying like hey, I'm I want to do I'm a coach for free coaching calls if this sounds like a good Thing, you know, not but the thing is not pretending not being like Yeah, I'm this big top notch coach But by actually saying like hey, I'm just I'm kind of like starting out But I'm already I think I'm pretty good at coaching and I that you know Something I could really help you so if you're interested I'd love to do it for free like a coaching call That's a really good way to actually get people Because you can message, you know hundreds of people a day um And the second thing about the commercials about promoting Here's the cool thing. Uh, just like I wrote in my in my book the free book Because you let's say you charge two thousand dollars Per per client and all you need is like five coaching calls with you know, the right people That means that as long as like let's say every lead Costs you two hundred dollars, which is absolutely absurd You'd still make a thousand dollars in profits but Even though the profit margin is so high I would still Wait a bit until you kind of find your style So find the until you find the way the to communicate That gets people to want to go on a coaching call with you Like the best time to record that kind of video would be right after the best coaching call you've had in a while Where you just take everything you explain and Take that energy and clarity and just push it out on people and So so I would wait a bit just just close your first client or two until you kind of get into the you feel comfortable closing people on You know two thousand dollars for example and then straight ahead you can jump to To uh to that basically to promoting it and it works It works amazingly by the way okay cool, so uh awesome, man, um One moment okay, so Uh, I hope that Makes it pretty much clear to you yeah, and The way I would break it down in terms of progress is The funnel is that simple like videos free coaching calls and uh And sales that that's it.  Uh, maybe how many of them actually go on a call because sometimes that's you know, those numbers are not the same But then uh, just how many sales and that's it. That's all you want to do and then you want to see where it breaks how it breaks down so you know am I if you're not getting enough coaching calls It's gonna sound funny, but literally just If you do the three-step checklist I told you about actually make the videos Because the videos you make right now are not for coaching. They're for education So if you actually change them like we talked about with the emotions the call to action And asking people to go on a coaching call now. It's a coaching video So just make it like that and if you're not getting enough coaching clients again It's gonna sound funny. Just make more videos Like like you make one every two days. It's not enough make one every day. That's not enough Make two every day. That's not enough make four every day. I'm not even kidding like It literally just works.  It really works and and also try promoting a bit, you know Just just take the videos, you know upload them to also To facebook to you know try to be a bit on forums just you can try to be a bit out there That helps But really if your goal is just to get coaching clients and as many as possible in the shortest amount of time It's it's quantity just as many videos That are coaching minded. So again videos that have the essence of coaching No matter the quality just as many as possible or just as many Try to talk about famous people to to bolster up the views just Just go crazy with it. Okay And uh, and i'm sure that within um a month from now Uh No, I mean I'm sure within like if you do that within two weeks you're already going to start seeing Like three four or five people going on coaching calls with you Oh, by the way, even even you can just do a video asking people to go on a coaching call with you Like I just did a video like that a few days ago It got like 40 views and I got like six new coaching calls. Yeah, I I'm I that's why I'm having this call with you So, yeah, it worked It really does work because I was like, hey, I want more Coaching calls this week. So just ask for them, you know like people It's a commodity Yeah, so so just let me know in the last next week two weeks just how it goes And again, just measure it really hardcore just how many how many views did I get? How many coaching calls application? How many people apply to a coaching call and how many people actually turned into a client and that's it. That's all You need to again as long as you go through go With the checklist so you know your videos are good As long as you do that because again, if you don't do that it's just educational videos You're not going to get coaching clients for that. So as long as the videos are coaching videos Just if you don't get enough coaching clients The answer is always more videos you don't get enough coaching costs more videos and try that out for a week or two and keep increasing the amount of videos you upload Until something's going to happen. So either the quality of your videos is going to improve significantly Or suddenly you're going to just change the way you communicate. Maybe you're going to talk about an interesting topic Something is going to stick and you're like, hey, that works. That got a lot of views Relatively, you know, maybe most of my videos get 20 that one got 150 Okay, so now I make more videos like that again, you make that ton of videos every day every week every day And uh, you just catch people and just get to the point where you get At 20 coaching applications in a month Just 20 people contacting you if you're and if you basically Aim for $2,000 clients With 20 people, uh, you're gonna be Making at least $10,000 a month. Maybe at least $8,000 And by the way working, you know traveling and working just you know working like 10 hours a week It's it's a blast And it's not hard. It's so if you're coaching minded again, there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to do that Yeah Cool. So, uh, sounds good Sounds good Awesome, dude. So yeah, keep me updated I gotta get going Okay And uh, again, if you have any question or anything feel free to Keep contacting me and I'd be I'll watch your videos. I'll see if You actually listen to what I said Okay, good Awesome. Great. Cool, dude. So yeah, uh, had fun and uh Talk to you later Yeah, uh Have a day Bye. Bye


okay oh yeah we're expecting high gust winds and a torrential downpour uh-huh cold air meeting hot air the heat wave shall be broken broken severed cut of thunder yeah tomorrow Sunday supposed to be what a high of 86 something like that 85 which is a drastic cool down from 95 plus with the heat index oh boy well we are awaiting the the call-in from our official mega life 21 commercial voiceover specialist William H. Morrill the third and see what's up with him you know our IT department director mega life 21 ID the IT department director had to completely disassemble his ultimate computer because the particular blue fluid that he used in his 100% liquid cool PC leaked out it got all over the motherboard is something about this blue stuff he said it just got out and it's all gummy and gunky and got all over everything so he's using a different liquid and he decided just to liquid cool the CPU and have the rest of it air cooled like mine I have a liquid cooled CPU and the rest is air cooled but he needs to order one of those magnetic dust filters like he like I have but what I did was I am I'm giving him a piece of the air-conditioned filter cut out that I cut out that he can use until he gets the magnetic one because them the mesh with the magnetic dust filter is very very fine it's it traps everything it's like it's almost like material like a handkerchief but but it doesn't you know it allows all the air to go through but it's like extremely fine mesh and it has that material like like the refrigerator magnets the ones that that that bend like rubber yeah it's like that material you know providing the there is an alloy of metal around your intake fan on the computer mine is plastic tada you would have to either rely on the suction power of your intake fan to keep the filter in place or invisible tape or you would have to tape it mm-hmm you would have to tape it I wouldn't use the gorilla tape was that now that's how I will say that powerful ship that's powerful because you have to take it off to rinse it periodically mm-hmm but the problem is you haven't been able to find where your intake job is fan is mm-hmm usually you can but not with these compact PCs of today maybe it's liquid cool I don't know yeah right I think you would know that by now just because it's old 2008 you know well oh there he is hold on hello is this William H. moral the third very good sir very good today is the last day of the heat wave thank God yeah we yeah well yeah to say to say the least so where are you where are you now where is your location now Baltimore Maryland good good I know you have something very special to say about newsletter sense it okay thank you very much William H. moral the third and we were discussing before about how in our society everybody the government society people in general parents everybody's afraid to use that magic little word called no because they're afraid of offending any particular group or person you know even in competition you know they want they tell all the children in school you're all winners everybody they're afraid of hurting somebody's feeling well that's wrong yeah it's not the real world you have people like Tony Robb everybody's everybody's yes everybody's saying no we're afraid to say other people that you are not special you have to make yourself well well plus plus happiness does not always have a monetary label on it I mean some people are just flat out happy without our own happiness by doing volunteer volunteer low-paying we're going to be your B score volunteers they love helping others in foreign countries we saw maybe army another turtle his volunteer workable a lot of communities here fire departments at EMT our volunteers well they're not paid yeah so success and happiness does not have a price tag on it does not have a monetary value I always does not we've said that before to yes yes yeah you want to stay local you didn't want a small yeah because it you have to you have to constantly fly to the different regions and you know and look the other franchise you know the other branch is over constantly yeah it's a bigger responsibility I guess requires more time more cuts into your cuts into your spare time yeah I mean there are people I've had enough money and he has time to enjoy his money yeah exactly well we were talking I mentioned an article that I found it okay I should have brought the stovepipe I I mentioned an article before when the show started that the company hostess was not forced into bankruptcy by union workers the fact that a matter is the CEO of hostess got a raise from $750,000 a year to 2.25 million okay and that's a that's a huge jump a huge raise and his executives got a staggering $1.8 million in bonuses after the bankruptcy filing and then the same executives admitted Billy that the money for worker retirement funds was used for company operations instead so people don't realize just how much money is wasted that's sucked up by the CEOs oh yeah the golden parachute right it's like it's like the Alex Rodriguez of the New York Yankees sitting on his ass all season and and you know I'm getting paid for it was it a contract you know it's the CEO in a minute I believe he hit two home runs the other day and in the heart in the miners mine is he coming back finally was it's easy still in the miners no he's coming he's coming back but but Derek Jeter's is re-injured he's re-injured he he didn't even come back from the first one day one day from the first injury I mean just think of all these football players and pro wrestlers that you know they they they they tear something or they dislocate something and they just tape it up and then they suck it up and they continue to play yes outstanding third baseman yeah but didn't he didn't hear a clippers I blame the trainer I blame the trainer to hang there I would have clipped that sucker off and get back out in the field but then again let's be honest oh really it's illegal obviously but it's funny his back was low his bat was loaded yeah oh it's loaded we're not fucking out of all the beverages here I used to I used to enjoy the the games between the umpire and and Gaylord Perry remember he used to put Vaseline on his on the ball nail files for other pictures nail files yeah they try four different tricks yeah that's why your that's why your tickets is so expensive to see a baseball game one of the reasons you know well now you now you have a worse problem than than these guys we just mentioned we we have the problem of the performance enhancing drugs the steroids and people think they deserve to be in a Hall of Fame and they they think their record they think they're wreckage yes no no was a lawyer is Mark McGuire and Barry and Sammy Sosa yeah they they were on the juice yes right the real one that counts I mean you know what am I saying I'm sorry seven hundred and yeah Roger Mara 61 right home runs so how many home runs does it does this Oreo have really wow is he is he he's definitely gonna gonna surpass the the greatest all-time Oreo for home runs that's for sure well what how long has this man been in baseball so he's a young easy young guy he's got he's got a whole life ahead of him really yeah well I hope he makes it he's clean he's clean he had drug test good for him good for him I like to see a good good for him I like to see a clean clean athlete break break records yeah because yeah Sosa Sosa McGuire they were juiced up Jose can't say goes juice bonds was juiced you know I don't think I don't I don't I don't recognize bonds beating Hank Aaron he was and actually people don't people don't realize it but but Alex Rodriguez's next home run record is is Willie Mays he's he's second he's second to Willie Mays in the all-time record yeah he passed up all the others like Mike Schmidt and Johnny Bench and all them guys yeah Brooks Robinson of the Orioles he was like a back he was like a him and nettles were like vacuum cleaners at third base 50 oh yeah he's broadcasting Brooks Robinson yeah and him and Boop Powell they helped each other a lot yeah Camden yards was the first the first new nostalgic I'm sorry oh yeah the hamburger place by boo owned by boo powell yeah I think I think Camden yards was the first nostalgic park yeah everybody copied I think the same company the same company that designed the same builders that did the Boston Harbor area or was it or was it inner harbor Baltimore's inner Harbor oh of course Fenway is Fenway is the is the oldest is the oldest Dexter Wrigley Field yeah these are historic these are these are historic landmarks that's true yes nostalgia well well Yankee Stadium was very lopsided I didn't like that was very unfair to right-handed batters I think they took the facade they took the facade with them you know the that that thing that looked like it looked like a fence look like a white picket fence on top yeah yeah they retained the facade just to have an old Yankee Stadium look but but now it's fair to both left-handed batters and right-handed batters but that's basically it so well Sir William we're gonna get back to you welcome to stay with us we're gonna start all of you as always yes thank you very much yes yes William moral thank you and take care bye bye okay that was William Mitch more of the third now let us sink our teeth into these yeah readings yeah reading time okay so I can see what I'm doing let me here's something light and easy on us yeah well we got we got a little light with the with the sports talk with William moral but you know what do we got here why is the heart so slow to follow the mind the background I split from an intimate love relationship that was toxic post-split we became friends but after a brief sweet period I had to end the friendship too well there was obviously a compatibility problem in the love relationship that carried over onto the friendship I mean because in order to be good friends in order to be friends with somebody you have to be compatible with them I know this was the right choice but I still mourned the loss of a woman dear to me did they go for counseling friends no no when no when there were no friends at the Golden Council before when there were a couple well he wanted and that part that was toxic man that was toxic you know what yeah we know uses that word a lot too this is the new catch phrase right well maybe it was toxic toxic this is toxic that's toxic toxic is is something poisonous that's great so that might it must have been really bad but you can't you can't freely use the word toxic for every damn thing you know that represents a serious situation it's toxic passion and emotions are addictive especially with a hot-looking chick we are low to give them up if you've seen some women you would understand why even if they are accompanied by pain that is true the stronger and more frequent they are the harder they can be to relinquish sex is very addictive how soon we let go if we ever do depends on the balance between the good and the bad plus individual factors such as self-esteem just because you figure out what to do doesn't make you feel any better about doing life is definitely an ongoing struggle and love is not it is a bittersweet it is a bittersweet pill to swallow to swallow you know it is a lot of disappointment and pain that goes with it I just saw something here about animals because you did you did you they do hear about the story of the two dogs here in New Jersey they were tied chained in the backyard and they were both seeking to get out of the heat during the heat and you know when animals do that dogs they they try to pull the the ground right now they they make a hole and they they lie in the hole they were they burrow yeah well this one dog you know got so hept up to get out of the heat he saw in the other yard there was like a lean to made out of like corrugated loman or something so it was a chain-link fence there so he's climbs the chain-link fence remember he's got the chain on collar hangs himself hangs himself one neighbor called the animal control but a day late now what the hell are two dogs being chained out in the yard obviously where the Sun can hit them or whatever because no water there was a pot a pan of water but it was still fake the water was probably hot as hell and filthy yeah cesspool so in other words this is this is animal abuse yes


beyond, I guess. And our first speaker. Recording in progress. Adal Thierry from the University of Paris-Saclay. Cité. Cité, sorry. We're going to tell us about dynamical mean field. Adal, whenever you want. Thank you for the introduction. And thank you for the invitation to this amazing conference. So today I would like to discuss dynamical mean field theory formally starting with glassy system and discussing, in the end of my talk, also application to ecology and inference. So the study of mean field models has been instrumentally revealing the appearance of many metastable states. Slow relaxation and aging has hallmarks of glassiness. The first analysis of the dynamics was pioneered by St. Polinsky and Zipelius in the 80s, mostly focused, however, on equilibrium properties. And then later on, thanks to Culliandolo and Courchan France, Mésard, Dien, Les Dussals, Parisie, the analysis of aging was also pointed out in specific models, in specific subset of mean field spin glasses and mean field models. So these such dynamical treatments together with the Thaulis Anderson and Palmer approach that is very well known also in machine learning and computer science and the computation of critical points of the given index that can be done using the cat's rice approximation that was presented yesterday, both in its annealed and quenchant version, has allowed us to distinguish two main classes of disorder landscapes. So on one end, spin glass landscapes, which are characterized by a sub-exponential number of free energy minima, which are separated by substancy barriers, convergence of one time observable to the equilibrium thermodynamic limit. That means that if you look, for instance, at the magnetization or the energy at asymptotically, this quantity will converge to the equilibrium value. And on top of that, the dynamical transition temperature at which there is a dynamical arrest and the static or thermodynamic transition temperature at which the configurational entropy exactly abruptly goes to zero, coincide in this kind of models. Then there exists another class of landscape which belong to, which characterize simple structural glass landscapes, which are characterized by completely different features. First of all, an exponential number of free energy minima, which are now separated by extensive barriers, no convergence of one time observable to the equilibrium value. On the other hand, what happens is that the long-time dynamics tend to explore, to wander across the most numerous and marginally stable states that are called the Dingergon threshold states and that the variance with the first class of models, the two temperatures, so the dynamical transition temperature and the static transition temperature, typically in this model, do not coincide, but tend to occur over well-separated temperature ranges. So what I would like to present in the following is a dynamical mean filter approach that could allow us to complement this static version of the, and it could allow us to complement the analysis of the landscape. So first of all, I should say that dynamical mean filter is rooted in condensed matter and systems of strongly correlated electrons with potential and many application also to high-temperature superconductors. But more recently, thanks to recent developments in many different fields, so this dynamical mean filter approach has been applied to many other and various contexts that involve, for instance, the analysis of amorphous systems and the analysis of their rheological properties, ecology and evolution, and inference. So what are the basics of dynamical mean filter theory? So first of all, you need to identify the correct, the relevant degree of freedom and to treat all the rest as a thermal bath in such a way to write down the Hamiltonian of your system as two different contributions. So the first one is the Hamiltonian specifically of your system or your relevant degree of freedom plus the Hamiltonian of the environment that will play the role of a thermal bath that can be mathematically formally modulated by an ensemble of harmonic oscillators or phonons. And then you have the Hamiltonian that takes the interaction between your system and the environment into account. And then as a second step, you can consider the bath to be statistical equivalent, statistical identical to single out the degree of freedom. So given these mathematical details, given these premises, you can then study and can then tackle the equilibrium dynamics, which is quite simple, in the sense that here, response and correlation are related one to the other by fluctuation-dissipation theorem. And you can also study aging dynamics, so you can try to study aging dynamics, which is a big deal in the sense that now, the response and the correlation are not related by fluctuation-dissipation theorem, but they are extremely slow function. And on top of that, the thermal bath is aging with the rest of the system. So what you can do in this case. So the dynamical mean filter theory question simplify considerably, dramatically, and can be written in terms of a closest set of the integral differential equation just for a very narrow class of models that include, notably, the spherical P-spin model, which would be greater than 2. The truncated Schering-Tonky-Patrick model, or soft-spin version of the Schering-Tonky-Patrick model that was first studied by St. Pauliński and Zipelius and then, later on, by Bushock, Ulland, and also the problem of a particle embedded in a high-dimensional random manifold. So here, I'm referring always to the classical version of this model, but clearly, there is also the quantum analog of this model, so they have been studied a lot also in their quantum version. So what is the main purpose of today's talk? So what I would like to do is to present a new approach for retaining dynamical mean filter equation and to study the asymptotic dynamic of this model and also to go beyond these three simple listed case to basically obtain a very general formalism, a very general framework that could apply to whatever models where dynamical mean filter holds and without explicitly solving the equation on the correlation and the response functions at two times. So the starting point is the dynamics for soft degree of freedom, this SI. So the evolution of this soft degree of freedom is described by a Langevin equation, where B is a soft potential. And then the interacting part of your Hamiltonian is described by this term, where J and J are quenched random variables that are extracted from a Gaussian distribution, this one. And you also consider a wide noise, which is a Gaussian random variable with zero mean and covariance delta correlated in time. So using a filter approach, so a Martin-Sieger-Rose path integral formulation, you can basically integrate out these quenched random variables, this J and J, and you can end up with a mean field treatment, so a self-consistent stochastic process for now for the single degree of freedom. So you move from a many-body problem to a problem in terms of the single degree of freedom, S of t, that depends now on this friction term and a noise, which is no longer delta correlated in time. So the price to pay for integrating out these quenched random variables is that you end up with a memory kernel plus a noise that contains two different contributions. So if you look at the covariance of this noise, now it contains a first contribution, which is for the TTI regime, for the time translational invariant part of your dynamics, and another part that can be written in terms of the correlation to the power p minus one that accounts for the interaction with the rest of the system, and basically described, as you can see here, it has a dependence on two times k and t prime, so it described escaping from the TTI regime. So what we did is basically to use a sharp timescale separation between the TTI regime and the auto-equilibrium part of the dynamics. So you can basically split your correlation function as a function of two different times, t and t prime. In the first part, qd minus q1 times the scaling function where the quantity to be over the one is the difference t minus t prime, and so basically this first part describes the decay from the starting point to the plateau, whose height is q1, and now we have a second function, f2, which satisfy time re-parameterization properties where the quantity to be over the one is now the ratio t over t prime, and so this second scaling function basically describes the escaping, the way out from the plateau value and the auto-equilibrium dynamics. So by making use of the same timescale separation, we could rewrite this friction term which takes two different contributions. So the first one for the TTI regime where I remind you fluctuation dissipation theorem holds, and another contribution for the aging part of the dynamics. And so since fluctuation dissipation theorem holds here and we have a clear relationship between response and correlation, we can basically integrate by parts this term in yellow, and we get these two different contributions. So this one is just a boundary term, and this other one takes basically the contribution of the correlation function to the power p minus one times the derivative of this degree of freedom, S of t. And so we can exactly repeat the same protocol on the noise-noise covariance, and we end up with the self-consistent stochastic process for the single degree of freedom that depends now on this friction term, a color and noise that again can be split in two different contribution, and the slowing-evolving effective field, H of t, that embeds all contribution for the slowing-evolving part of the dynamics. So this is the first result, but the other remarkable result is that this new stochastic process can be mapped, can be associated to a quasi-stationary probability distribution, which is nothing but that the Boltzmann Gibbs distribution at a given fixed temperature t. So the main difference with an equilibrium approach is that now we have this calligraphic with this effective potential that takes different contribution into account, so the original potential, but also the contribution for the slowing-evolving part of the dynamics, H of t. So this result is perfectly in line with a similar approach, a similar strategy that was performed by Cugliandolo and Kirchhoff for analyzing the motion of a particle embedded in a random potential and coupled with two different bars at two different temperatures. And so since we also know P of H, so the distribution of the slowing-evolving field, we basically have all the ingredients, all the tools to obtain P of S, the full probability distribution, integrate our degree of freedom over this probability distribution and obtain the parameter Qd and Q1. So as I said, Qd and Q1 correspond to the starting point of the correlation function, so C at the same time, t and t, and Q1 is the decay of the correlation function, so the high of the plethora in this long-time-limit scenario. But in a replica approach, so in a static formalities, this Qd and Q1 can be rephrased in terms of the size of the deepest and the largest basin of attraction. So if you want to rephrase this purely dynamical picture in terms of the landscape structure, they basically give information on the overlap parameters in your Parisi matrix. And so now that we have a complete characterization of the dynamical process, we can think about what happens in the, we can wonder what happens in the aging regime. And so in this first part, I would like to characterize aging dynamics for models that are characterized by just once-low timescales or for people who are familiar with this other system, this corresponds to models that are framed within a one-step replica symmetry breaking. So as I said, we split our dynamics into different contributions. So the first part of the dynamics were the degree of freedom, fastly equilibrate, and the slow part of the dynamics in which there is a violation of fluctuation dissipation theorem and the emergence of auto-equilibrium feature. So for describing the aging regime in models that are characterized by just once-low timescale, the physical requirement is that the dynamics in the TTI regime has to be marginal. So this means that the relaxation of the response or the correlation function cannot occur in an exponential way, but according to a power low decay. So we use a perturbative diagrammatic approach to rewrite the stochastic process for the single degree of freedom, where these are zero as much simpler expression in Fourier domain. So we express this response function in terms of omega in Fourier domain. And so this response function in the TTI regime admits a Schwinger-Dyson equation. So it can be written as the inverse of this Bayer propagator that is graphically represented by a straight line, plus another contribution which is called self-energy and basically accounts for all one particle irreducible diagram. So it basically accounts for the diagrammatic perturbation in the couplings that are due to this term. And so now the condition embedding, so accounting for the appearance of a marginally stable dynamics, is that the inverse of, so the derivative with respect to omega of this inverse response function evaluated in the small omega limit has to be divergent, has to be infinite. And so if we look into the tails at the expression of this inverse, at this derivative of the inverse response function, we get an exact expression where the numerator does not matter because it's not singular at all levels in perturbation theorem, at all orders in perturbation theory, but the leading contribution is given by this denominator. So when this denominator touches zero, we have a condition for the appearance of a marginal dynamics. And so again, what you can do in the statics, you can write the action matrix of your free energy, you can compute the second derivative of your free energy that correspond to your stability matrix, you can diagonalize your action matrix, and you could look at the smallest gain value of your matrix that gives information on the criticality of the emerging phases. And so if you do exactly the same by using for instance a replica approach, you will see that this denominator in a purely dynamical computation precisely coincide, precisely correspond to a vanishing gain value in the stability matrix. So the appearance of a zero model in your stability matrix. But in this case, we have a more general approach in the sense that we can perform this dynamical computation for whatever models where dynamical means theory apply, and we don't need to define a free energy or an Hamiltonian. So this is specifically for models that are characterized by a one step replica symmetry breaking, so just one slow timescales. Now we can wonder what happens when the model is characterized by an infinite sequence and infinite hierarchy of slower and slower timescales which in jargon correspond to a full RSV picture. And so the different universality class to which this model belongs. So basically this described the case for instance of the Heising-Pispine with P equal to two, also called the Sharon-Tonkir-Patrick model. So the different universality class to which this model belong lead us to introduce a new rule, a new criterion for studying the dynamics, and also lead us lead to a completely different phenomenology in terms of aging and in terms of resulting features. So we need now a new rule, a new criterion that could encode this infinite hierarchy of timescale and therefore this infinite sequence of effective temperature. So as you can see here, we don't have any more a finite number of Q value of overlap parameters, but we have a continuous function Q of X where X is the violation parameter that described the ratio between T and T effective and the effective temperature. And so we have to describe, we have to find a good criterion for describing this full RSV scenario, this full RSV picture. So what we did is to study in detail H of T, so this low-ing evolving effective field that contains a first noise term for the aging part of the dynamics at the integrating response times M that can play so for, can play basically the role of a magnetization so an average spin. And so we look in this model to the variation of this low-ing evolving field in two subsequent, in two close time sectors. So we compute this variation, delta H of T, specifically a time T plus delta P, T and a time T. And so this variation between two subsequent sector takes contribution from three different terms. So we have a first term, which is the evolution which describes the evolution of the stochastic slow noise. Another term that multiply, that basically multiply your response function evaluated at the same time, T and T, times the magnetization which provides an instantaneous snapshot of your system plus this other term which is the derivative of the slow-ing evolving part of your response integrated over all previous time. And so this term you can see that immediately drops out because it provides us a bleeding contribution compared with the first two terms. And so we end up with this delta H of T which has the form of a stochastic process with a drift term and the diffusion term that have to be determined. And so to determine in detail this drift and this diffusion term, we basically use a generalization of fluctuation dissipation theorem. So we could rewrite this drift contribution in terms of this violation parameter X that I remind you since we are describing the full RSV picture, these X is a continuous variable ranging from zero to one. So we rewrote basically this drift contribution in terms of a generalized fluctuation dissipation theorem. And we notice is that the noise covariance is nothing but the different correlation, the different contribution of the correlation function in different time sectors. And now the turning point to close the equation is to notice that at a long time limit there is this one-to-one mapping, a one-to-one relationship between each time scale T and this parameter X. And so this property translates into the fact that the correlation in different time sector is can be related, can be mapped to a continuous function Q of X that is exactly the function that I showed before in the full RSV scenario. So this Q of X describes the intrastate overlaps reached at the largest time. And so by gathering all the contribution together we end up with the distribution of this low-ing evolving field H, whose evolution is now measured in terms of an effective temperature change. So we are no longer expressing this evolution in terms of the time scale, but in terms of this X, this violation parameter or effective temperature change. And so for people who are familiar with the replica computation, this is exactly the same stochastic Langevin equation that was found by using a thermodynamic approach, according to Parisi's solution and according to the emergence of a hierarchical cluster, hierarchical organization of the different equilibria in the landscape structure. So with the purely dynamical formalism, we managed to get exactly the same stochastic equation that was found in the 80s by Parisi and coworkers. And so now that we have a completely general scenario, I would like to describe, given the topic of this conference, I would like to describe also interdisciplinary application. So how this formalism can be applied, for instance, to inference, problem and ecology. So in inference problem, you might be interested in, for instance, in identifying the condition for which your gradient flow has a positive correlation with the signal. You can, for instance, define a loss function like this, which is a trivialization or a generalization of the perceptron model, as you prefer to think about, where x star is the signal and xi is the pattern, so the weight. And so what happens in terms of the landscape? So there are regions of the landscape that are quite easy in the sense that the landscape is just characterized by one single minimum or there are minima that cannot trap the dynamics and there are other regions of your landscape that are characterized by many, many spurious minima that can basically trap the dynamics and making it slower and slower. And so in the previous part of my talk, I was interested in finding the condition for aging. So what is the condition for finding the effective temperature and the out of equilibrium dynamics? Here, a natural question that one can ask is, how to derive the algorithmic threshold for the gradient flow? And another interdisciplinary application I'm working on right now is the critical ecosystem. So the description, the correct description of critical ecosystem, not only using static formalism, like the cavity method or the replica computation, but also dynamical mean filter approach. And so one of the model, one of the reference model that has been mostly used in this field is the loft-cavolterra model that was introduced at one century ago, but now it's... Go for Libyan or Lizer or Liby. Now it's... It's okay for them. Yes. Is it okay? Okay. So one of the mostly used models in theoretical ecologies, the loft-cavolterra models, so this equation I've been introduced in one century ago, but more recently I've been studied also in their random version. So the idea is that you start from dynamical equation for the relative species Abundances Ni, where I now is an index that run from one to S, and this is the total number of species in your species pool. So this evolution equation is basically described in terms of a self-regulation term that can be written in terms of a gradient of a single species potential, plus a cross-regulation term that can be written in terms of this coefficient, alpha ij. And then to complexify a little bit the scenario, you can also introduce a demographic noise that scale as the square root of Ni, plus an immigration parameter that basically couples the A-land to the main land of your model. And so the main assumption to get an exactly solvable model is, for instance, to study from a well-mixed community where you don't have space dependence to treat this demographic noise in terms of a Gaussian-wide noise with zero mean and covariance, again, delta correlated in time. But another important assumption, so last but not least, is that to tackle into account the complexity of your ecosystem, you can basically assume that this interaction, alpha ij, are random and, for instance, are extracted from a given distribution with a given mean and a given covariance. And so by performing exactly the same protocol that I mentioned before based on a time-scale separation, you can end up with a dynamical mean-field theory formalized for the single species and dot, where now you have mu and sigma, which are the mean and the variance of this, the mean and the start and deviation of this random matrix. And you get also these friction terms that as you can see, it takes into account also gamma that describe the degree of symmetry of a symmetry between your coupling. So it's a very, very general approach, according to which you can perform, you can obtain the different phases of your phase diagram and you can also go beyond the replica computation because you don't need, according to this dynamical mean-field theory formalism, you don't need to define a free energy or an Hamiltonian operator. So to conclude, I presented here a new approach that we did in collaboration with Giulio Virali and Chiara Camarota to deal with cases where you cannot close the equation on the correlation and the response functions at two time. And so basically you don't have the tool to obtain a closed set of integral differential equation. So I define in this way a self-consistence stochastic process for the single degree of freedom, which is coupled to a terminal path and a determined two different criteria for obtaining the condition for marginal stability, models that are described first by just one's low time scales so that are framed within a one RSB picture and models that are characterized by an infinite hierarchy and infinite sequences of time scales, lower and slower time scales. And so as you could see, this new effective stochastic process can also be mapped in quasi-stationary probability distribution and according to this mapping you can obtain all parameters and the whole main quantity of interest for your models. Then there are other open question that one can try to answer. And so time is running out. So I would like to thank you for your kind attention. Any question? Okay, so I'll start with mine. I would like to know, you mentioned at the beginning the limitations of this kind of formalism. What are the key components of a model for this type of formalism to apply or not to apply? Okay, so an important limitation to apply so on this model is that you have to perform an analysis in the long time limit in such a way to basically use a sharp time scale separation between a faster regime in which a fast degree of freedom, fastly equilibrate and the slower relaxation dynamics. So first of all, long time limit. So long time limit is one of the condition. And another important property that we use is that this noise is Gaussian in such a way to use Novikov theorem and particular theorems from mathematics. You can try to generalize also to other kind of noise. Clearly it's a bit more involved and a bit more complicated but you can do it in in perturbation theory. And another thing, another important assumption is that we assume that there exists weak ergodicity breaking. So I'm not describing complex scenario like mix at the spin or stronger ergodicity breaking scenario. So in the weaker ergodicity breaking scenario what you are assuming is that at a finite, at a long but finite waiting time, your correlation function eventually decays to zero. So this means that basically you are losing memory of your configuration that are reached at a finite time. So every configuration and in configuration that's reached in a finite time will be completely forgotten because of this weaker ergodicity breaking. So for stronger ergodicity breaking is much more difficult in the sense that you should keep memory of your previous configuration and so it's difficult to generalize in this case. There is a question by Jean-Christophe which is... No, they are... Okay, so... Can you read the question? Is there... Okay, aren't these equations derived for the spherical models? Is there no spherical symmetry plus minus one? You can still do all of these. Okay, thanks for the question. So here I'm starting from the simplest possible scenario where these SI are soft spin, are just soft spin which are subject to a soft potential that can be whatever. So it's not necessarily forced to be on the sphere. So what we did is basically to study also the... As I said, so we also studied the Ising model would be equal to two that correspond to the Sharon-Toky-Patrick model. To do this you can try to use a sort of truncated SK model version that means that you assume to have a double well potential with a given roughness parameter and in the end you will send this roughness parameter to infinity in such a way to recover the discrete spin version. So this can be generalized. So you start from, let's say, a double well potential and then you can recover the equation for the discrete case. And so this is basically what I discussed in the second part of my talk when I mentioned a full RSV picture. Any other question? So your solution is still on the... needs a thermodynamic limit, so can you... Yes, yes, it's in the thermo... So as I mentioned, so we are assuming a long time dynamics and also an infinite degree of freedom, yes. Yeah, so my question is about the use of that in the Lotka-Volterra model. Can you think of a system that actually has... What we are trying... Not infinite, but a lot of degrees of freedom. Okay, what we are trying to do now on the Lotka-Volterra model is to reproduce meta-community scenario in the sense that we are introducing space and so we are assuming different communities that interact according to diffusion and migration parameter between different highland. And so in this way, one can model also activity front as a function of a finite number of species. Does it work if you have this spatial structure? Sorry? If there's no random interaction between everything, there's some spatial geometrical stuff. So you have random interaction between your species, but your model system, instead of having a well-mixed community, you are modeling meta-community scenario. So you have different highland that interact. But it's still interaction with no lens scale? Sorry? You can also assume that the interaction of your variables just decay on a given range. So you can use a sort of cat's limit.  So they are not long range. They are not cushioned by decay on a finite range. Then we hold for short range interactions because here it's looking more like an SK. We are trying to work on this. So I don't have results yet in this direction, but we are working on this. Thanks. All right. If there are no further urgent questions, we'll think again about that. OK, there is an urgent question there. Yeah, sorry. So I think it's going to be interesting to talk. And I'm far into these topics. So what generates the long time scales in these kinds of models? Just the interactions are so complex. Is that the intuition to have? Sorry, can you repeat? What generates the long time scale? What is the? What generates the long time scales here? So it's just an assumption. So we assume that we are looking at the dynamics at very long time scale. And so it's an assumption that was firstly used by Cuyandola and Kurchan in this PISPIN model in such a way, basically, to treat, to perform a mean field approach. OK, so there are two different strategies. You can assume that you have an infinite degree of freedom, or you can either assume that you have an infinite degree of freedom, and so you can write your mean field equation, or you can assume to be at infinite times. So here we are assuming, so we are assuming both hypotheses. We are dealing with both assumptions. So long times that allow us to simplify this dynamical equation, because otherwise I cannot use this sharp timescale separation. I will get just the first part of the dynamics at short timescale. And so I would get correction that are not simple to tackle with, to tackle. OK, OK, thank you. All right, thank you very much, Ada, again.


Should dropshippers work with one supplier or multiple different suppliers? That's one of the most common questions that I'm getting. And in this video, I will show you the exact answer to this question. And why do I think like that? Short intro and we are starting. Hello, everybody. So this question makes me crazy because a lot of dropshippers are asking me this question and this question comes not only from beginners. I also hear experienced dropshippers who come and ask me asking me this question that Leo, I want to go to 20 different suppliers. How do you recommend me to do that? The answer is I don't recommend you to do that at all. I recommend you to focus on one supplier in the beginning. And when you become more advanced dropshipper and you want to try some more techniques, go to another one that you want to go and become a professional on this specific supplier. When you have all of the knowledge using this supplier for at least a few months, you can go and add one more supplier. But you will never go to more than five suppliers in parallel because it doesn't make sense to do that. All what you need to do is to become a professional in very specific supplier in the beginning, and I will show you now why I think like that. So first of all, let's start from the reason number one. And then I will show you the second reason why I think that you need to focus only on one supplier at the same time and then go and add more suppliers, but one by one and not jump into multiplayer, multiple suppliers at once. So first of all, let's talk about the biggest suppliers in the world. Let's say Amazon.com. Amazon.com, according to January 2018, had a five hundred sixty four million different products. Doesn't it enough products for you? Do you really think that you need more products than five hundred sixty four million different products? The answer is for sure not. So why would you go to other suppliers if you have here fast shipping time and great customer support and all of the benefits of Amazon? Now, I don't I don't say you to go to Amazon and work only with Amazon or recommending you Amazon as a supplier, but every supplier has its own benefits. So what I recommend you to do is to find a supplier that you like, that you like the benefits of the supplier and start to learn the supplier really, really, really deeply, start to understand their shipping times, all of the tricks that you can do with the supplier, how to find the best shipping products at the fastest way using the supplier. For example, on AliExpress, you have the drop shipping center, same for Ben Good, for Costway, have their recommendations for Amazon, have their movers and shakers that can help you to find different and good selling products. So why would you start and focus on many different suppliers together? You cannot really become a professional when you work with this way. Let's talk about Walmart, same about Walmart. We have 46 different million products. Doesn't it enough? Isn't it enough for you to really make profits using Walmart? The answer is for sure. Yes, 46.1 million products is enough to make enough profits from Walmart. So you don't really need to jump between different suppliers. And here also you need to go and learn the supplier really deeply to work smart and right with them. Otherwise, for example, your account may be blocked. You may do some different mistakes using the return process and stuff like that. The second reason why I really recommend you to focus on suppliers one by one. Let's talk about Ben Good, which is one of the most amazing suppliers that I know. They have the Chinese warehouses, they have the US warehouses and they have a good customer support if you compare it to other Chinese suppliers. But what I want to say about dropshipping from Ben Good and why I would recommend you to focus on one supplier at the same time. For example, if I'm a beginner and I want to start dropshipping, I can go to Ben Good and become a really professional using Ben Good as a dropshipper supplier and then not only that I will become a professional, know all of their tricks and tips and everything there. I will also get a huge edge over my competitors. What does it mean? So for suppliers like Ben Good, for example, we have the dropship center. So if I go here, I will have here these kinds. So as you can see, as much as I grow and as much as I do more profits and more sales using Ben Good specifically as a supplier, I will get more discounts from them and a bigger edge over my competitors. So let's say that I got $30,000 in sales using Ben Good in total and $10,000 in sales in one month, which is not a lot. I will get here 10% discount for all of my orders from Ben Good. Isn't it good? It's great. You will have a huge advantage over your competitors. You can actually sell with 0% profits and get from Ben Good 10% back. So we will become much more competitive, have a huge edge over your competitors and make more profits. Not only that, when Ben Good sees that you are in a higher VIP level here, by the way, for Autodesk users, you can get immediately to the first VIP level, which is a good start if you use our link. So you will also have get better support from Ben Good because they see that you are a big user, you will know exactly how to work the right way with their customer support and all of your processes will be much easier. So I really recommend you to focus on one supplier at the same time. Don't go and focus on many different suppliers. It doesn't make sense. It will not help you in any way and it doesn't really help. Why would you do that when you have so many different products in a specific supplier that you can choose? Again, if you want to work with more than one supplier, you can focus on two at the same time, but learn them one by one. Even the biggest sellers that I know with millions of products, all of them use with one or two suppliers maximum. I hope that this video helped you and gave you some ideas about what are the right directions to manage your dropshipping business. Like this video, subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to ask us any dropshipping related question in the comment section on YouTube. See you in the next videos. Bye bye.