The craft foods company presents the Great Gildersleeve. It's the Great Gildersleeve starring Harold Perry brought to you by the craft foods company makers of parquet margarine and a complete line of famous quality food products. Now let's peep into the world of Summerfield and see what goes on there. It's Thursday night, not Saturday, but a familiar commotion upstairs over Floyd Munson's barbershop Leads us to conclude that the Jolly Boys Club is assembled there. Nobody wants ordered judge. We're trying to organize a poker game We have a request from a member guilty for a brief business session. What member what business? Yeah, we never do any business Floyd Munson has made the request chief, and I feel we should honor it Munson you something to bring the attention to cloud I'll say dress the chair and you may have the floor But dress the chair and you may have who made him chairman anyway Please kill me Mr. Chairman fellow members, I'll say what I gotta say and you can take it from there And I might say before I start. I'm sorry to have to bring this up at this time The club rooms here belong to me of course the banks got a piece of it, but the building's in my name And the wife's Alright, alright, what of it order order continue well I've been letting the club use the place glad to have you but Something's come up day before yesterday. I had a chance to rent it read it who'd want to rent this dump Well, it was a young fella and a girl just married. What do they care where they live? Anyhow they offered me 20 bucks a month that's a lot of money for this place Floyd inflation chief That's what it is. Well the OPA said it was okay. I figure I can't afford to turn it down You gotta turn it down.  Well, I was talking it over with the wife last night And I told her that I said lovey the fellas won't like it the club's been a second home to them What did she say Floyd? Well, it's no use going into that To her 20 bucks is 20 bucks at least but now if the club was to pay me rent Why naturally I'd be glad to have you fellas stay on oh so that's it You call yourself a jolly boy Floyd. You're a hold-up man. That's what you are if I may step from the chair for a moment Gilder sleeve you're being ridiculous just back in the chair Let's just look at this thing sensibly We're asking Floyd to give up $20 a month so we can have a club room Is that the way for jolly boys to treat each other? I know that's terrible. It's all there is to it We've got to reimburse Floyd for the use of the club rooms. I Now resume chair. Oh Do I hear a motion that we reimbursed Floyd for the use of the club room? Won't someone make the motion? I'd be willing to make it. That's illegal and unconstitutional Listen fellas, there's only five members in this club Do you realize we'd each have to pay for it all as a month dues many clubs charge even more not for a draughty room with A kitchen table and a busted piano. Oh, it ain't a bad piano The Elks don't have no piano at all. The Elks have two pool tables. Sure when they pay dues They get something for it. Well, if we had more members the dues wouldn't have to be sighs Hey, you might have something there judge Don't be childish Floyd when you ask people to join a club They expect to get something for their money like a pool table Couldn't you get all of a pool table someplace for ain't pool tables cost a lot of money? I know who's got a pool table Maybe he'd be willing to join the club and let us have it then we could put on a real membership drive Well, who's got it your friend a neighbor gilded rumps and Bullard has bullet got a pool table No fooling it sure would be nice to have a pool table right in your house That's my idea of living. Yeah, well, I don't I don't know whether Bullard's got one or not you've seen it horse Oh, I assume you had haven't you ever been in your rich neighbor's house guilty on numerous occasions But I never saw any pool tables. Well a pool table is pretty tough to hide ain't like a day bed, you know No He might have a bill your room in the basement a playroom probably lots of people have playrooms down in the basement right there with the furnace I hear well, why don't we look into it? You drop over there tomorrow guilty and see if he wants to join then ask him to lend us the pool table Why me it's for the jolly boys commissioner sounds like the only way we can hold the jolly boys together Well, you put it that way, but I'm not very anxious to call on rumps and Bullard He's never been particularly friendly. That's probably because you never got to knowing down underneath. He's probably a swell fellow It's not easy to get to know rich people chief Always afraid you're gonna get something out of them like a pool table I'll see what I can do now for heaven's sake.  Oh, yes. Yes. Come in. Won't you? Well, thank you can't stay after get downtown But I well, I thought I might just pay a neighborly call Glad you did wife's gone to New York for a few days. So I'm all alone here with Craig. That is.  Yes He's going to bed. I'm glad to say why don't we just come into the library guilty sleep as long as there's only two of us Library fine. I've never seen it. Hmm. Just down the hall here Well, well Books I've accumulated a few volumes sit down have a cigar. Thanks, but here try one of mine three for a half No, no, no, I insist I have these made up for me in Evanna if you were like a mild cigar Yeah Light by George. That's a real cigar Yeah, yeah, it makes nice smoke Gold tip Care to look at some of my first editions or perhaps you're more interested in fine printing Findings and that sort of thing are Are you a bibliophile? Oh, you bet I am I belong to the book of the month for several years Well, I've got it Yes, I have a few nice items here and see here Something else Milton's Paradise Lost handset in London by Alfred Royce printed on vellum with red and gold initials and bound in full Morocco, I've read of course But to a lover of fine printing our here here here. Just just look at this page. Oh page 24 beautiful justice clear They only printed 200 of these they they sold originally for seven hundred dollars a copy, huh? Yes, yes, but I was lucky and I picked it up at an auction in London for five hundred and sixty I robbed him didn't I it's like taking pennies from a kid's bank Find a lot of books you got here. All right. No, I I'd forgotten you'd never been in this room Care to see some of the rest of the house. Well, I got to be getting on By the way, yes nothing Well, you don't have to go just yet. Let me let me show you around. Well for a minute There is my my gun room. Oh, yeah gun room Another of my hobbies the really old pieces I keep in the glass case here I see that that big fellow there on the end. That's a Spanish blunder bus from the 18th century Hand car barrel will it shoot? Well, I hate to try it now I've begun on the right as an old flintlock musket my pistols and rifles go over here. Hey, this is a regular arsenal You're not expecting in here No, no, no, no, but I dare say I could give a pretty good account of myself if necessary Now this this is a derringer early 19th century devilish looking little thing isn't it? Yes Let's go back to the library Now we'll go back to the library later first I want to show you the billiard room you've got to see that. Don't tell me you've got a billiard table I say billiards is really a gentleman's game. Well, I can't seem to get the hang of it ever play any pool No, no, I never cared for pool or do you like it? No billiards is the game for me Well drop over any evening you care to play I might just do that. Who do you play with generally? Oh no one in particular? I I haven't played a great deal of billiards since I lived in London. I Longed to a club in London where I got very fond of it. Oh, is that so? Speaking of clubs, mr. Bullard, I yes Nothing Yes, London's a great place for clubs Now this was a place in German Street and standing right there in the same spot for over 200 years Oh pretty exclusive district around there a lot of fine clubs in this club They had no six or eight billiard tables and several card rooms and many's the afternoon I've seen five thousand pounds change hands in that card room. Hey, that's a fortune. Yes Yes, but there's a gentleman you could hardly tell who won who'd lost Of course one afternoon a fellow shot himself after moon.  He was but Wild as the devil youngest Duke the youngest son of a Duke. Oh a Duke Must have been a terrible shock to his father and frightful frightful the whole club was in mourning for a week But club life is a fine thing fine thing. Oh you bet the spirit of good sportsmanship Yes, sir the feeling of loyalty and companionship between real gentlemen. Yes. Yes. I miss club life. I Don't suppose there are any men's clubs here in Somerfield. Are they yield asleep? Huh, I Say are there any men's clubs here in Somerfield? No, mr. Bullard there isn't a single one A minute I tried to ask him I started several times to ask him and then each time something would come up that I couldn't Well of all the chicken-hearted fellas to send on a simple error. Watch out. What who you're calling chicken-hearted you old goat Well, what's trouble couldn't you get him around to the subject? Well, we got to the subject All right, we talked about clubs for quite a while. What a cinch just say speaking to clubs Mr. Bullard there's a little spot where I and a few of my friends hang out like that If you drop around some time it wouldn't have worked Floyd Well, I'm blessed if I see why why didn't you ask him commissioner because he's too good for this crummy joint That's why well, I'll be done. What makes him think he's such a much. That's what I want to know That's not his idea necessarily Floyd. It's my opinion You mean you think he's too good for us if you put it that way. Yes, mr. Gildersley.  He has a dog that costs $300 He has a gun collection must be worth thousands. He's a fellow that's used to gracious living He can't hang around a club like this. It wouldn't be right Is this bullet too good to associate with a judge of the probate court? Judge hook is a pretty high-class fellow. Thank you, but chief of police one of the highest jobs in this town and a useful man to know Thank you. And what's the matter with peevee runs as nice a drugstore as you'd want to see and Floyd He's got the only barbershop in the south end of town. I know fellas You just don't understand Bullard's been in high-class clubs in London with dukes and gentlemen You asked me guilty this fellas nothing but a big snob. He is not.  All right.  We don't need you around here. Hello is mr. Gildersleeves a jolly boy. I'm not sure he is chief not if he considers himself and his friends too good for us Go on go play pool with Bullard. All right. I will Can you imagine that? Just for a pool table. It's not a pool table.  Indeed we do turkey with all the trevings and when Mrs. Lang planned her menu I dropped a broad hint for some of those wonderful baking powder biscuits She serves on special occasions. Well, we prefer Parker house rolls or muffins Well, it's a sure bet that hot breads of all kinds are popular on Thanksgiving menus and of course Everyone knows a delicious spread makes hot biscuits rolls and muffins taste extra good That's why I always like to suggest that you serve them with parquet margarine. Why that's our favorite spread mr. Lang We always use parquet margarine my husband likes parquet better than any spread We've ever tried and I can well understand that because parquet margarine's fresh dairy-like flavor is still unmatched So this week when you're shopping for those good foods to serve during the Thanksgiving season be sure to buy parquet Margarine the spread that tastes so good. That's P. A. R. K. A. Y. Delicious economical parquet margarine made by the craft foods company I'm sure you'll like it because millions prefer parquet margarine to any other brand Now let's get back to our story. It's Saturday night and Saturday night is the Jolly Boys night to howl But a voice is missing For the first time in many weeks gilder sleeve is not to be found with his old associates Gilder sleeve this evening has hurried through dinner stuffed a pocket with expensive cigars and set out to take advantage of Bullard's invitation to drop in anytime Scarcely 24 hours have passed and here he is dropping in Hello Craig is your father in Leeroy Well, he's at home. I guess Tell your father will you Craig that mr.  I want him to come over. Well, Leeroy can't just now I'm afraid Craig right up until your father. He has a caller. Well, yeah Yeah Tell her it's mr. Gillis leave. It's mr. Gillis leave from across the street. Well, there's nobody home Oh, yeah, mr. Bullard will be back. Maybe I'll just amuse myself in the billiard room There's nobody home. Yes, you said that He said I might use his billiard table anytime. So if you don't mind for having anything to me Guess he didn't Find way to treat a man and invite him to use your billiard table than sick the nurse on Saturday night only 730 can't just go home and go to bed besides it's Saturday night Won't go down there, but what can I do here? She comes surprise. Oh, it's you Aren't you surprised to see me Lila? No, I suppose you'd be around sooner or later. Oh is that so? We'll get you things on Lila. We're going places Saturday night. I'm sorry I have a previous engagement which I'm just about to make but Lila It's time you learn track mark now have better things to do than sit here and wait for you to turn up And it's time you learn there's more to caught in a lady than just twislin. I had a some Saturday night What is there to do? Nope, I will not go down there Suppose I could stroll down to the drugstore See what's doing there? No, I'm always hanging around there won't go there either Well, I guess all that leaves is home What a town Saturday night at home I changed my mind Marjorie you Going somewhere my dear over to Francie's she has some of the gang coming in. Oh, well have a good time Thanks You wouldn't care to stay home and play a quiet game of dominoes or something with your old uncle I suppose I'd love to I just love to but I promise Francie and the gang and I wouldn't want to disappoint them Ask me another time with you. Yes. Yes. Well along have a good time Oh Yeah, where's your brother? What's he doing? Oh, he's going to the movies if he hasn't already gone Oh, here he comes. Yeah, you're dressed up for once. Yeah My boy, how would you like it if your old uncle went to the movies with you? Well, I wasn't going to the movies exactly. He was gonna take me to hear famous Jones in his orchestra at the majestic Now wait a minute my boy I thought you and I might just stay home together tonight and have a good game of dominoes you kid Then if we stayed home tonight by next Saturday, I'd take you to that football game. You've been wanting so much to go to How would that be? Well, of course, it's up to you my boy You get your choice the movies with birdie this evening or the football game with me next Saturday Makes no difference to me one way or the other Well, if it makes no difference to you won't I think I'll go with birdie.  I am nobody I just pay the bills around here That's all just about giving you up for this evening I'm just about giving myself up. How do you mean? Pee-pee. Have you ever tried spending an evening alone worst darn thing in the world? That's terrible, that's why I came down here to have somebody to talk to Well, as a matter of fact, I was planning to close up here a little early so that I could stop by the Boy's Club on my home. Oh well in that case. How does it happen you're not over there this evening, Mr. Joseph? You always seemed a pretty faithful. I couldn't make it. Oh Well, she shared a stuff by there with me. Yeah, I think I'd better not. Thanks Shoot yourself, but you said you wanted somebody to talk to Well, truth of it is Pee-pee. I've had a little falling out over there with some of the less desirable elements Talking about flying well him and some others Chief Gates him too. Okay. Mm-hmm.   I'm sure if you come over there with me now and everybody apologizes That's one thing. I'll never do apologize Don't just come over there with me. Let him come over here.  That's a good fellow. I'll wait down here Call me if it's all right And I suppose they're hashing me over up there now.   Hi. Hi. Come in. Come in commissioner join the happy throng. Thank you chief Now we've been talking it over here commissioner the pros and the cons Floyd has got something he wants to say to you. Go ahead Floyd. Say it. Yes, Floyd. Say it. Well Commissioner I'm sorry if I got a little out of line here the other night The fact is I didn't say what Pee-pee says.  I never said you were fat Everybody knows that Floyd I didn't come down here gentlemen to be reinstall it Floyd now. Apologize nice like you said you would go ahead Floyd I'm sorry commissioner. I don't know what come over me. I could bite my tongue off Well ain't that good enough? I think that's very handsome Floyd commissioner. Well, maybe it was my fault a little too Floyd now that I come to think of it. Hi, you'll swim there That's just my golly. It does my heart good to hear you talk like that. What say we shake hands all around a I'm game shake it shake shake There is your covering in the town in the town I Oh Great killed a slave again in just a few moments During the Thanksgiving and holidays season. There's usually a little strain on the family food budget So on your shopping trips now I imagine most of you laities have an eye out for the best values and food and when it comes to spreads for bread One of the best values I know of is delicious parquet margarine Parquet is only about half the price of costly spreads and it provides you a family with such rich wholesome nourishment Parquet is one of the best energy foods you can serve and it's fortified with important vitamin a and as for flavor Parquet is preferred by millions because it tastes so good on bread toast rolls and waffles So if you want to make a real saving on a quality food buy this nourishing spread that tastes so good parka y Parquet margarine made by craft. He said I'd be back and he was right. Good night, everybody The great gilder slave is played by Harold Perry it is written by John Gleedon and Sam more music is by Jack This is John Lang speaking for the craft foods company and inviting you to listen in again next week for the further adventures of the great gilder slave Ladies here's how to be ready at the drop of a hat with sandwiches snacks and appetizers Keep a package of delicious Pabstett cheese food in your refrigerator Pabstett is ready in a jiffy can be served a hundred different ways It spreads melts slices Toast to perfection any way you serve it any time you serve it your family and guests are sure to like Pabstett's mellow cheddar cheese flavor Pabstett comes in two popular varieties Golden cheddar and pimento. So head up your shopping list with delicious Pabstett cheese food This is the national broadcasting


Rwy'n gweithio'n gwybod gyda'r ein cwlad i'w'r fideo ac yw'n gyflawn i'w Llu i ddim yn gofio gan fy nôl. Deisio'n gwybod gwaith i chi ddim. Rydyn yn fawr cais o'r cyflawn ar y g口 o'r profesiy guilty, ond mae'n gweithio'n gwybod ar ddefnyddio. P命 yn lle'l yn brif. P mwyl yn lle. Rydyn ni'n mynd i'n loddi ar fy gwlu. Pwy yn roi'n gweithio y gwlawn, byddai â'r ysgrif honno. Rydyn ni'n gofio gweithio y gweithio. But basically you've been a tailor-made man for quite some time in terms of driver haven't you? Go on, give us the kind of where there is. I have no loyalty to tailor-made at all. I think they make great drivers. I found a shaft. That's a disclaimer. People must think that I've... I found a shaft, I had a tailor-made M3. Five years ago, six years ago, I think maybe 2017-ish, or something like that. Dyna ga'n fydda'r ffarchadau? Nid oeddwn yn y blynyd i'r sioffedau. Roeddwn wedi ddod y bydd yn ddod, yn ffarchadau! Ac byddwn yn y ffordd, mae'n ddybydd. Mae'n ddod i'r ffordd. Mae'r ffordd a'r ffordd wedi ddod, mae'n ddod i'r ffordd. Mae'n ddod i'r ffordd, mae'n 70 sioff. Yn 70x? Yn 70x, mae'n ddod i'r ffordd. Mae'n gweithio'r ffordd. felly mae'n gwaith ym 3 amser, maio ddim yn oed rhai. Dw i'n gweldon ni'n oed yn y cymduru. Rydw i yn oed, am hyffordi'r helydd, ond ydych chi, ond ei wedi'u cael ei wneud o'r llunio'r hwy, wedi ddorion lle mae'r cyfrifio'r rai cyntaf yn y bwysig. Ond ydych chi – yw'ch tyd i'r hwyr ar y cwestiynau'r cyfrifio. they did three heads isn't they it's the sim too. It's a low spinning one. Nine degree set up, one notch up so slightly high in loft and all it does is just close the face angle slightly. I just like the way that sits. I've always done that with the tailor-maids. If you up a loft they close the face if you... So just for how it sits, I kind of moved up from M3, M5 and then I went to the sim of the sum of the waiting. a then sort of progressed to this and have progressed beyond that to stealth Yeah and stealth two and then have ended up going back there was sort of just couldn't trust it on the golf course I think that's you know so you said to me yeah I did numbers were good numbers were good that's why I went for it you know I'd just go right ahead I know I've got a shaft that works ac rhaid bod hi'n sefydlu i amlaenai yng ngweithio rhaid hynny, cyfry eich siff a rhaid fy nhw'n cael eu mhugau i eich bod hynny. Dwi'n ddych chi'n gwneud ymrindigau arall felly eich gwneud felly ond... A ydych chi'n gwneud hynny a'n ddysgu'n ddweud hynny, mae'r maen nhw haen i'r beth. Wrth gwrs, mae hi'n ddyn nhw'n bwrdd ac yna yn dd contaminated gyda'r ffairway showcase. Rhaid? Definitely none of Colin Moir Cowher and Rory Mc cotton there. I just can't find a combination at work because you can invite me to the kingdom, we'll sort it out. Let's see you because I mean again I'll switch on this tREASER because I don't want to jinx things Lou but in general terms this is an impressive watch it's like I said the one thing I like about your whole swing with this. Interesting extra stiff shaft and when you're swinging it you look as though you gan beth oedd o, efo enghreid a'ch chi'n gweld... A wedi cymdeithasol, that's just... That's you allover bit of that little bit of a right-to-left. Ball flight is always where it differs between, again, average golfers and professional golfers, in this cases the the ball flight always tends to be a bit more penetrating than forward and then kicks on, wher as those average golfers maybe get it a little bit more floaty let's say, but Mae gaeli i'w ymod i rõi i fynd, mae'n gweithio eich cyffech i'r ymlaen, mae eu bydwyd yn cyffech ar y synchau newid, a'n gweithio sut mae'w adegwyd glas i gaelio, am y cy ignorantai am gyda'r tyfe, a'r cael ei joddo cy erro ymlaen. Beth i'w gweithio, mae'n gweithio'n llwybu ar ddysgu. Mae'n gweithio i gaelio'n cwestiynau yma. Rhyslau, cyfeun o'i drwy, mae gennych'u'n hyffodol eich cwilio, mae o'n rhan oes i gaelio eich gyfan? Ac i chi ceisio��n chi? Wath fyddwch mewn ddau? Fyddwch chi'n demonol i chi'n ochr i gawdd i chi'n mynd, efallai sut? Ychydig! Efallai sut. Rydw i'n ddweud am dweud i chi. Poesco, yn werth? Shrydsio. Ddweud F85. Dwi'n fyddech chi'n ddweud o ceisio uned. Fysg iddyn nhw. Efallai yw'r defnydd. Efallai'r defnydd. Yn ei fod yn oed i'w oedd y ddweud, yma'r clwp yn y cyfnod o'r cyfnod o'r cwmwysgog, mae'n clywed o'r newydd sydd yn gwybod, mae'n ddod yn ei ddweud yn digwydd, ac mae'r ddweud yn ceisio. Mae'n ddweud yn cael ei ddweud yn y cwmwyng yw'r bach. Felly mae'n 15? Mae'n ddweud yn y llyfr, rydyn ni'n cael ei ddweud. Mae'n cael ei ddweud yn y cyfrifio'r ddweud. Ac nid oed, rydyn ni'n dwy fathion ffraeg a'r ysbryd. Rydyn ni'n dweud a llach o'r mawr a maen ni'n dweud. Er oed, mae'n fathion blynedd i'r ysbryd, mae powered yn ym pherwydd. Ac mae'n dweud bod, mae'n dweud am dweud i'r dweud a fyddech chi'n edrych chi yma, pwfr o ddech chi, i gydig� enw i'r fel dweud yn cymryd. Ie'r safnwyr gyda wahanol wahanol, ac mae'n dweud i'r dweud i'r bydd, Ac rwy'n cael ei ffwrdd amall yn blaen o'r maen nhw ar hyn oedd chi'n gwybodaeth Going to club. Rwy'n meddwl een yna ngynrych. Dyna ddigon, yn gwybod. Cyfefannau. Rwy'n meddwl maen nhw. Ond dwi'n cael pob i'r fideo. Fyddai'n cherddau'n ei bod yn cofnig oherwydd bod yw'r cyfrif. Mynd yw'r cyfrif yng Nghaerfod Lluwys yn ceisio'u chubiau yn cael £10 mllai i'r gym workplace. A fydd eich hwn yn mynd i ddweud llawer o'r byd. Rhaid i ddaw'n grwp fwy o fynd! Felly mae'n ymgechai'r bwysig. Ond eich clwmp i'r maen nhw, ac mae hynny'n goch i bod weithio rydw i'w sweth o'ch bwysig yn gweithio gyda chi'n bwysig, yn galluweithio i wybodaeth ar gyfer'ol saith o femydig. Mae'n gweithio'r bwysig i'r newid o'r clwmp, mae'n sailio'r bwysig ac mae'n gweithio'r gwaith o'r femydig, Cynnyddwch chi'n ddweud ei gwybod yn y cwymig. Foldwch chi'n ddweud... Foldwch chi'n ddweud... Mae gynnydd am y llwy, mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gwybod. Felly, gallwch chi'n edrych yn ei wneud eich gwybod yma. Mae gwn i ddweud am y cwymig, yn cyflawn gyda ni, yn gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. Mae'r adres yn cael ei ffrif. Mae'n sylweddol am y ddweud. Mae'n cael ei gwybod ar hynny. mor ddoch yn datblygu fel hanes gan y fichu. that's better than this in terms of like on a launch monitor. you say well that's better but out in the real world this just seems to do everything i want it to do. confidence is huge innit? ye nice nice ball flies into the sky as well. kick on kick on it's just about getting into the basin loop Rhaid o'r diwrn ddigonwch, oherwydd o'r malig-gredig yn cael sefydliad yr oedd mae'n rhaid i drydd. A thryw bwrdd rhaid o'r dyfod. Ynaeth y cysyllt yma? Feilw, mwy ddalod o'r bwrdd 155 oed yn fwy o'r goffir gwaith, er SER. Fydd yma hefyd yn bach oherwydd... Ond os wedi bod i fi yn ym conceit? Y new P770? Rwy'n cael ei ei wneud, dw i'n cwrdd awrig a'r bobl am gwahaniaeth neu i dda, Mythi wnaeth yr adws llwyddoedd felly ar chi. Mae hi o'n awgraed dwi'n arwad yn y llwyddoedd, mae'n adws llwyddoedd gyda'r cyfliad. Byddwch chi'n gweithio peir ystod a llwyddoedd o'r adws llwyddoedd pan os i'n pob i'n gweithiool? Byddwch eich bodai eich bod yn eich ystyried i'r adws llwyddoedd a bwysig o hyn gyda llwyddoedd, gan y blawd i'r adwyddoedd, arnynno bwysig o dweud gan y bwysigol llwyddoedd, Cwyrdau, culoadau, i chatio, pwysgrun gwyb sydd yng Nghymru. Rydych ddaf yn unrhyw pwysgrun gwyb. Erbyn gwaith yma, mae eu bod yn llwylo'n arddangos. A cheswch gyda'r sgwr ffordd i ddim o'n pwysgrwlad i gysgrwlad. Mae gweithio â'r hyn ynrolwch, ac yn rhaid hwnnw maen nhw'n gweithio'r rhaid llawer o'n hyn i gyd. Dw i'n ffordd i gael, mae'r cyffin i'r prynsgol yw'r hyn! Ond e'n meddwl i'r ffordd, ac efallai'n gwneud yn y dyfodol. Rwy'n meddwl i'r ffordd – p70s. Rwy'n meddwl i'r newydd p77s, ac mae nhw'n ei ddwy'r ffordd i chi. Rydyn ni yn ffordd o'r pro? Byddwn ni wedi gweld yn y llwy? Rydyn ni'n meddwl i'r pro? Mae'n meddwl! Mae'n meddwl! Rydyn ni'n meddwl, rydyn ni'n meddwl i'r gweithio gyd-gau. Mae'n meddwl i'r ffordd o'r cyffredig. Maen nhw'n gwneud y gwiriaeth yr angen o gyfionwyr am yw, a n-nw'n gwneud n-wg nyfanyddai — eich gwneud ynchwynt gyd, am yw bod eich erbyn sefydig yn gwych vannol mi yn credu yn gwych beth. Gan gwrs, mae'n gofyn i'r rai ddweudio, fe'n gwneud i chi o ôl i chi'n gwneud eu bod yn llawer, sy'n gwneud i chi'n gwneud hwnnw yn ni. A oedd eich remain yn yw a'r beth. Fyrda chi'n gweithio'r arhaig gyd yn gwneud, ac mae'r ffordd o'r bwysig yn ymwneud hynny'n gwneud, ond mae'n gwybod yw'n gwirio'n gwybod. Mae'n gwybod i'ch gwybod i'ch ddiwgol a'i'r ymdweithio. Rwy'n 150 oel, mae'n 7, 9 o 8 o 9. Mae'n gallu ei hyn yn ddiddordeb, mae'n gallu'n gwybod i'ch ddiddordeb. Mae'n gallu'n gallu'n gwybod i'ch ddiddordeb. Mae'n rhaid o'i gyd. Mae rhaid o'i gyd, mae'n gyd. Yna mwy gweithio i gael unrhyw â'r pethau iawn, oherwydd mae hi weld a ch抽u, oherwydd mae'n rhaid am gynnwch, rhaid a oed ein rhagwlad yn ambeithio. Rhaid? Rhydd gan ddigefnau. Ddewch y byddai nefnwch rydym yn cyd-dweithio i fferwad. So, … a mynd i ddechrau'n rhaid. Rhaid oed yn cy��fio i'r rhagwlad! Rhyw oedd yn mi gyd yw fynd ddu i ddweithio. Ond ond rhaid? Rhaid i ddweithio i ddweithio i ddweithio. Ond yna'r llest o'r risoedd o'n ei ddylu. Yn gyflaun, Llyw, y dyma'r hwn ymlaen i'r bag yw'r hynny? Rhaen. Rhaen rhaen. Rhaen. Rhaen. Rhaen, mae'r ddweud o'r ffordd o'r rheini, yn ymwneud yn ymlaen i'r lle, rhaen? Rydym yn ymlaen i'r bach, rhaen. Rhaen. Rydym yn y bag, mae'n amser. Rhaen, mae'n amser. Mae'r ddisgwun o'r ddweud. Fe oeddwn ni'n cael 14. Felly, dwi'n credu am yr hyn. Ga'n rhaid i chi. Dwi'n credu am rhaid i chi, mae'n rhaid i chi'n credu am 7 a 9 o ddod. Mae'r ddweud i'n credu 7 o'n credu. Mae'n ddweud, mae'n ddweud, mae'n ddweud i'ch cwmpwysan. Mae'n credu, ac mae'n ddweud. Mae'n credu, mae'n credu fydd yw ddweud. ddylu'r mhreithwyd yn hynny. Mae'n ei gwybod amddasol. Felly mae'n sadywch ar y dda i mewn. Felly mae'n sadywch arwt y cael. Rwy'n meddiwych pan cyllid yn unig ar gwellion, rwy'n meddwl am rwy'n meddwl am y llyfr. Rwy'n meddwl am chi'n meddwl am eich llwyr Drawsbyn. Felly mae'n mewn gwahodr. Felly mae'n mewn gwahodr ac mwy'n meddwl am eich llwyr. Ond ydi, mae'n meddwl am yr hyn agoraf Llyw, mae'n meddwl yn y llwyr 3. Dyna'n i gael, mae'n ffordd o'n fideo. Dyna'n i gael, mae'n gael, yw'n gael. A dyna'n meddwl yw'r 7W, a dyna'n i'n ffordd i'w ffiydiwb y dyfodol yn y ddweud. Yn y ddweud. Yn y ddweud. Felly, mae'r cyfnodd, yn ei wneud, yn y 3-iron. Yn y ddweud, mae'n cyfnodd. Felly mae'n ddweud. Mae'n ddweud. Mae'n ddweud. Mae'n ddweud. Mae'n ddweud. Mae'n ddweud. Mae'n ddweud, P770, a chyfo'r gwag. Felly mae'n gweld. Mae'n ddweud. Mae'n ddweud fordaf i gyflarioli. Mae'n ddweud. Wnaedd gan y dyfodol, mae'n gweld i'n gweld i'n gweld. Mae ydych chi'n ddweud o'r ffordd ddweud. Mae'n ddechrau, mae'n ddweud, ac mae'n ddweud. Yn mynd i'n gweld, mae'n ddweud. Mewdd yddych chi'n ddweud. Mae'r teulu yn gwneudio'r ddweud yn y rhain 3a, fel fy ngomeniadau. Mae'r dywin? Rwy'n oherwydd mae'r dywin yn ddiwylliannol. Rwy'n oherwydd mae'r dywin yn dim yn cael ei ddweud. Mae'r dywin yn ei ddweud yn y llyme'r bobl yn y smith yn ddweud. shattered. Mae'n gwneud i'r ddweud yn y llwyd yng Nghymru. three iron and this one should be easier to hit shouldn't it but it's just there we'll see oh my word to me it's it's ridiculous to say it's probably gone three times as high the carry distance yeah it's a little bit further but it just stops it away doesn't it i pushed it a little bit but you know what i mean as you know i've covered these clubs um the seven would quite a lot and they always talk about how ridiculous the ball flight is but when you see it compared to like a three iron they are very very different i can understand that's a big dilemma i might have laughed that down a little bit yeah i mean interesting with the put a g4 30s that obviously it can make that adjustment in terms of loft so that's an interesting bit in terms of that long end of the bag and i'm pretty sure it's a debate you're still going to have and would you ever vary it depend on the course you played or would you that's the only reason yes i think they'll probably both you know sort of be in the boot if you like yeah and then depend on day and and where i'm playing yeah um because that's quite a unique part i can't really do that with anything else yeah that shot which is which is nice but again just going back to the whole thing what we do on this channel you can very much understand why that is a favourable club for average golfers though it's well kind because it does the thing that a lot of us are going to struggle with yeah yeah i got that without well i mean the only highlighted fair words i've tried is with you yeah so i ordered it with sort of a the right shaft in for me and yeah kind of went for it didn't me good man right that's interesting let's move on right what have you got before we go any further ironically i've got to hit the one that i said i didn't want to i've got 93 up the hill right so first of all we're going to talk about wedges 93 yards in we've got right now i'm looking down you've got cleveland rtx zip cause yeah why that wedge um because it's the most plain and simple and i am plain and simple okay i don't i just like the fact that it just looks just looks normal yeah so other wedges have you know just you know if anyone's ever picked them up they have a little bit different on the top line a little bit different on the sole a little bit different on the face some rust some don't some are full full grooves and that kind of thing full face jet black finishes and all that this is just yeah chrome it looks you know i think cleveland make the most traditional they've never really got away from that model like that model of we make good wedges and we're just going to stick to it that's fair um they spin good i like them if i was going to change i'd probably just get the same yeah um and just new grooves um but cool but yeah okay and again i was talking about gaping you go 50 54 58 and you just said 93 yards you're picking up a 50 off camera you said to me it's probably the one that you're not why don't you like that one or what's the thing i just think um it's where my club's going to you know that's a blade isn't it okay it's a full blade yeah and people don't people just call it a wedge but it's not it's just a blade it's 50 degree so i always have the debate of whether to put in a gap like an a wedge or a from the p 77 yeah yeah i always have that it i would i very i do everything i can to avoid hitting that flat out wow um so like this is you know the yardage i could probably get 54 there but uphill be cold um i'll hit this and i hit soft and i like it and it's no problem um once it gets into its sort of full yardage which might be about 110 yeah you know 112 i'll do everything i can to hit a soft wedge that's interesting so if you remember going back to the irons that we spoke about we said we stopped at a pitching wedge and that's now what you're referring to the the the question mark whether to have extended that i get what you're saying that yeah interesting right before we go mate i have a little bit of a shot i think that's i think that's a debate that everyone should really you know what i certainly degree i'll just have to turn a little bit of a shot tracer on the second for this one but yeah i mean again going back to trying to draw it back to like the average golfer element yeah that's what i always say you know we kind of play we play game-improving irons and then we switch up into these speciality wedges that are like you've just said they're blades it's a game though the reason i say that is because i don't want people to think that they have to go and buy five to pitch a wedge or four to wedge or whatever um you know going by six to six to gap or six to sand yeah um because i think that might help them you know certainly i don't enjoy hitting this one flat out interesting but i don't i don't enjoy it well the camera's on mate so let's see what you can do nice good distance control by the looks pen i yeah what do you think about the feeling things is is that coming to play does the change up from a p770 into them massive yeah yeah massive um yeah and that's probably the maximum i'd hit that that club and i started to think it's maybe a bit of a waste of a club at quite an important end of the bag and i use it a little bit for chipping you know the low ones but um it's something that you know i i'm not happy with that shot and i think i could do it better with another club so okay interesting that i might have a look at well that's where she's done we're right down that bottom end of the bag but i think for me an interesting conversation is where we go next and that's to the short stick and i'm really interested to know where lu is at with his putter right now right lu putter which is i think perhaps an interesting one for me to uh see where you're at with this really because i know it's one that you've perhaps struggled with yeah over the years even is that fair to say yeah i don't yeah yeah i've had a lot of putters yeah i've had a lot of putters so it was um i mean i've actually got two in the bag haven't i yeah i mean i don't think that'd be uh um this is the one i've been using for a while i use this all uh all of 2022 it's a scotty camera in red x yeah um centre shaft centre shaft just a standard grip on it yeah um how this come about really this was the putter i always really wanted as a as a kid sort of playing golf and i never really had it and then the opportunity sort of last year to kind of put it in the bag um and i've had some success with it you know i've hauled some puts with it yeah it's not a bad putter yeah i like the fact it's got um it's got like a gss insert in it which they don't make um too many of anymore and when i put well with it i love it but like you know i i am quite streaky inconsistent would be there sort of thing um i flew it with all different styles of putters um different i've tried different lengths different necks different you know mallets blade everything i love the look of a blade i like the centre shaft here i like different things and the thing i really struggle with is everything points that i am a good put you know when i get on track man or if i have any data people tell me that i stroke it okay but it's hard when you miss putts isn't it so and i know we all miss putts so um this part of the bag is always open for debate okay i think that's um something which is completely opposite of everything else yeah um i'm quite continuity i'll keep the same where it's putter i will just change yeah no problem well it's interesting because after this has finished and assuming the rain rolled off just a little bit longer we're about to film a video with some two different putters um and it could well be the fact that you even changed to another putter after that video we'll see yeah but i think the bit for me again is that i think this is the same and resonates back again to average golfers it's something i've swapped and changed with i think ultimately what you're explaining really is the fact that you've got confidence and reliability in every other club in the bag yeah um you have them with your putter it's an irrelevant of make model style or whatever if you haven't got confidence in the club in hand it's a massive downer isn't it yeah it's a huge element of the game the the mental side of the game so interesting that that is the putter right now it'll be interesting to see in a few weeks time if that remains the case so putter done is anywhere else left for us to go really but no interesting yeah once again thanks to Lewis for his timing going through that like i said what i've tried to do is tape what is a pose bag and adapt it some way at least into the mentality of average golfers so i hope you enjoyed that um give us some feedback and comments down below you always like to see Lou on the channel and i'm sure you appreciate his comments and the kind of honesty in where he is at with his bag as well which is always nice to see right that's all like i said we're going to move over to a couple of greens do a bit of filming with some new putters so make sure you keep your eye out for that one and i will see you all tomorrow night


I will try and keep the energy levels high for the last session. I'm excited to go last, but I'm also upset that I go last, because then I don't get to start this tradition, which is, what's your favorite annotation? Guys, come on. This is my favorite annotation. It's a little Mediodoodle that Copernicus drew in the margin of his, on the revolutions of heavenly bodies, or whatever it is, in somewhere around 1543, shows that I'm not the only one doodling in the margins. OK, so this is me, my website. My name is Tom Critchlow. I am a strategy consultant by day. I work for myself, so I work with a lot of different kinds of companies. A lot of them are media companies. And if anyone wants to talk about the role of annotation in media and editorial workflows in particular, I would love to talk about that. That's not what I'm talking about today. I'm also a blogger, and that's what I'm talking about a bit more today. I have a now page on my website that lists a bit more of my varied interests and things that I have going on. If you guys aren't familiar with now pages, this is a great thing started by Derek Severs, which will just be a bit of a tradition. And I want to talk a little bit about how I find love with annotations and how I use them in blogging or network writing, as I like to call blogging, a more fancy term. People look down at me sometimes as a blogger. Hopefully no one in this room does that. So this is the beginnings, which is just as a great blog post by Austin Cleon called Reading with a Pencil, and this idea of reading texts closely and your marginalia and so on, which I'm sure is not used to anyone in this room. This kind of started me thinking about this whole idea quite a few years ago about the role that marginalia plays in the web, in particular, about how that's often missing in many ways. All the way through to my own lived experience, this is a screenshot of a blog post in Google Docs form. So when I do my blogging, I often write the longer pieces as Google Docs and share them around to people I know, friends, friends of friends, people on Twitter that I meet. Those sparks are kind of a healthy debate and conversation, often corrections in the margins. And that this all kind of gets stripped away when you publish back to the web. All of this is basically just copy and pasting a text in the middle and publishing it into my CMS. And that was a shame. That felt like a waste that these are really valuable things that people are adding. And not only are they valuable, but they're also attributed. So when I publish the final piece, I'm taking up credit and attribution for all these things by trying to attribute where I can. But it's nice to have people's faces and names and comments there. That led all the way through to a little bit later on, stumbling across the hypothesis tool, and starting to use this on friends, blog posts, where I felt like a close reading was necessary. So this is a good friend of mine, Toby Shorin, has a blog called Subpixel Space. And he wrote already a blog post that I already loved, but that I disagreed with sections of. And so I went through and did a close reading and said, hey, I really like this bit. This is good. This is strong. There's a section of the argument here that falls down for me. And this is basically me using hypothesis as a Google Docs kind of replacement of a way to say, hey, I want to come say something about the thing that you wrote. And that was a really great discussion. And then that led me all the way through to the last six months I've been writing a book. I've been posting the chapters or chapter-like objects to my blog and to my blog post to be getting it a little longer. And I wanted to start retaining this idea of marginalia and side notes. So this is the current template that I use on my blog, which is longer form inspired of a thing called Tufti CSS, if any of you are familiar. But it just lets me add these side notes, but they're not interactive. You can see on mobile that collapsed by default and they can open up. But these are still just static things that I put into the publishing workflow, even though I've started to use these for some of the attribution things. So when a post starts as Google Docs gets a comment that I really like, I will take that comment and copy and paste that into the margins. But it's still a clunky and a static, and it still lacks some of that core attribution. So that led me to what if I could use hypothesis on my own site? What if I could use that as a commenting layer? Is that a tool or a network that I can start to accumulate around my writing of close reading? Especially when I left this hypothesis close reading on a friend's blog, he naturally wanted to come back and do it to me. So there was that kind of how can I encourage that or motivate that? Should I put hypothesis on my blog natively? I tried that on and off over the years. And there were some frustrations that I had in particular with using hypothesis on my site. And so I wrote this post in February, I think it is, that led me to here. So thanks for the people that read it and anyone that's probably people in the room who left hypothesis notes on this as well. So thank you for those people who are here. And you can go and read this and explore it in more detail. But the crux of it was me, just as an average punter, not being a UX expert, not knowing the hypothesis roadmap or resources or priorities, but just looking at how this works for me and what I like and dislike. This is a hypothesis experience, particularly on mobile. So this is things that you're probably mostly familiar with. This is the genius web annotation. And particularly on mobile, there's a few things that I really like about this, in particular for UX purposes. One of them is, if I can use this little pointer, you guys can see this. Yeah, so one is putting the annotation button, unlinking it from the selected text, is actually a really nice feature on mobile because there are other things that pop up when you select text, especially on Android, which I'm more familiar with. So I really like the idea that this goes at the bottom of the page, it's kind of anchored. It gives a nice, clear user flow. Obviously, they only have one annotate button. There's no highlight button or Notion ingenious, I don't think. So that's something that I really like about Genius. And the second thing is that this X button goes inside the window pane, which is not really a big deal on desktop, but on mobile in particular. If we go back to the previous slide, this hypothesis button here, you can see that it's actually on top of my name, which is also the link to the homepage of my site. And so closing the window often was also a link back to the homepage of my site. So that's a really frustrating experience on mobile. So putting the X inside the window just kind of neatly sidesteps that. So that was kind of one observation that I had, and one thing that I liked. And then this is the Google Docs kind of comment Notion. So not a second annotation, but comment Notion on mobile, which actually many people are not familiar with because most of the commenting on Google Docs happens on desktop. But there's a few things, again, that I really like here. In particular, this idea that comments don't appear from the side, they appear at the bottom. So there is a kind of a fixed height window that basically takes up half the screen on the bottom. Then if there are many comments, scrolls vertically. And the one thing that I really like about this is that you can see the text at the same time. So that's the thing that we kind of take for granted on desktop with hypothesis where you annotate the text and the slider comes in. But for the most part, you can still see what you're talking about. On mobile, that's not true. You can see this on hypothesis kind of completely covers the screen. Pros and cons to all these options. I'm not saying any of them are perfect. But that was kind of the layer of the land that I mapped out. And in the process of writing that and the process of exploring hypothesis a bit more closely for my blog, I settled on this, which is, forgive me, I'm not a developer, so I'm sure this can be written better and I'm sure John, I'm sure cringe or hopefully just improve the code that I have. But I now have this running on every blog page on my website, and what it does is this. So this is the, see over here, this is the kind of default out-of-the-box hypothesis experience on mobile. And this is the kind of slightly cleaned up version. And there are two things to note. One is that I've hidden the window by default. So especially on mobile, it's a slightly less intrusive experience. It doesn't get in the way of the content if there are no annotations out already. So it kind of gets out of the way a bit more. But the annotations themselves are still highlighted in yellow. So you can still click those and expand the sidebar. The button for the sidebar is pushed down. So this is the, I think this is the clean theme. Forgive me if I'm wrong, John, or anyone else. But that just means that it's less likely to interfere with an on-page element, which is nice. Gets around some of those things a little bit. And then the background I turned to white just for kind of aesthetic personal preferences. And this now runs on every page on my site. So feel free to go in and do this by default. We don't need the Chrome extension. Hopefully gives a slightly broader footprint to this. So people that don't know what hypothesis is and don't know what annotations are can still come to my site, see the yellow text, click it, and discover this whole workflow. It's not ideal, not perfect. But I'm starting to get to a point where I'm feeling like, oh, this is a thing that I can have on my site and leave on my site and might solve some of my issues. This is kind of a slight side note. But one thing that I wanted to call out in observation is this is the LA Times. And this is a kind of a pretty high-profile usage of annotation on a news publication where they were using an annotation tool so that they didn't have to define cultural terms in the article. We're doing this because we want the people who already understand those terms to feel like a target audience. Really great, feel-good kind of usage of annotation and a really respectful idea behind different audiences and different perspectives on the web. And it uses Genius. And I think this is instructive for a few reasons, especially where newsrooms and media organizations are entirely mobile-first at this point, almost mobile-only to a certain degree. And there's no reason this couldn't be in hypothesis except that I think the Genius experience looks a little nicer except for this Powered by Genius thing, which is ridiculous. I don't know why they have it in there. But that's by the by. So I'm going pretty quickly, trying to fit everything in, sorry, for the ramble. So the blog ecosystem, so there's a deeper idea here around why annotations are important and why I like them in the first place. And I've had several conversations over the past couple days about the idea that regular people and the social web already understands annotations relatively well. This is a tweet, but is also essentially an annotation. This is somebody taking a screenshot and highlighting a section of a web page and commenting on it, adding perspective or adding just some kind of reaction. And that this is a very kind of well understood and comfortable medium for people. This is not an edge case. This is not a power user feature. This is something that I see in my Twitter feed all the time. And so there's definitely appetite and demand for this kind of activity, which is interesting. And some of the side channels I've had over the past couple days or even this afternoon was around respecting the idea that actually incentives are important to adoption of a certain technology and that playing nicer with Twitter, whatever that means in the Twitter ecosystem, making it easier or more frictionless to get in and out of the Twitter experience and hypothesis experience could be interesting for more adoption and more social awareness within the tool. And that threading as a kind of broader concept is a thing that is getting more and more traction. I think that when Twitter's UI changed to kind of make threaded tweets a more kind of natural embedded use case of the product, it became a thing that people's mental model fits well to. They understand the concept of linking multiple things together and publishing in that way, in that workflow. And that threading is now, at least again in the small corner of the web that I hang out in, starting to expand a little bit. This is a blog post that Aaron Z Lewis, who I don't actually know personally, but I really like this blog post which lays out some of the different ways that threading is happening today across blogs and Twitter and some other areas, in particular looking at kind of some of the super power users of threading and how they use it and so on. And I think this is really interesting because you could copy and paste, find and replace threading with annotating in this blog post relatively easily and most things will still make sense or still be relevant and interesting. This is, so Twitter is one area where I see quote unquote annotating already happening within my peer group, my social network. Arena is another one. Hands up who's familiar with Arena? Anyone's familiar with Arena? One, one person I think in the room. So Arena is interesting and worth paying attention to. It's where my peer group goes for knowledge creation and connecting knowledge together. It's a research platform is what they call itself. It's kind of a rudimentary social network. It's a rudimentary bookmark tool, some combination of all of those things, but allows you to grab things from the web and to put them into groups and categories to collaborate on those things. It has some notion of a quote excerpt feature. So not an annotation tool per se, but this is really interesting also because one of the reasons this is widely adopted is because they have a kind of a brand and a clear cultural position about the kinds of knowledge that they're interested in and so on. And so they're not agnostic to those things, which I think is interesting and instructive in terms of building community and building adoption in various tools. Being a tinkerer and a blogger, I'm relatively uncomfortable with Arena myself, partly because I feel like their business model is built on a house of cards and so I don't believe they're gonna be around for a long time. So I built my own Wiki on my own website, which tells you a little bit about who I am. And as well as building a Wiki, I also have a kind of an idiosyncratic perspective on blogging itself. And I wrote this blog post called Small B Blogging about how I think about blogging and what blogging does for me. And one of the things that is important out of all of this is building close reading, building a smaller but more engaged network of interesting and interested people around the writing and the publishing that I do. And this was kind of the beginnings of where annotations also was bubbling in my head, I wrote this last year. And ever since then I've been chipping away at this idea of how do I do Small B Blogging, which is about building small networks, building people that are gonna closely read my work rather than trying to spread to the masses and get as many clicks and page views as I can. And there's a particular framework in there. So this is a framework called Release, Reference and Rework by a blogger called Venkatash Rao who runs a blog called Ribbon Farm, hands up who knows Ribbon Farm for people. Great, so that's a whole bunch of new Ribbon Farm readers potentially. He is a little bit off the deep end with some of his blogging, but I really love this framework in a blog called The Calculus of Grit about basically how to know whether you're on the right track with building your own kind of cultural system and building your own network and building up a body of writing over time. And his theory is all about this three R framework of release often so published regularly. Reference or reference your own work, go back and when you have an idea, lead the trails back to the previous versions of that idea and the thread in the chain and then rework, so take it, don't be afraid to keep refining the ideas you have even once you hit publish, you can hit publish again or you can go back and edit a piece. And this idea in particular of referencing and reworking is a thing that strikes me that annotation and hypothesis is really great at. This idea of linking documents together, of keeping documents alive after they've been published. And so again, this idea of hypothesis and annotations is bubbling through. And then this is another great blog post that I read from a guy called Matthias who I don't know personally again, but I'm not gonna read the whole quote, but he basically said, if we can make the conscious decision to find better ways to connect our personal sites and enable more social interaction again, what we would end up with is not only a bunch of personal websites but a whole interconnected personal website verse. And this aligns very well with the kind of indie web movement that many of you will be familiar with and comfortable with. But again, I see hypothesis as being a potential tool in this personal website verse, this idea of linking these sites, the disparate sites together and ideas and people. And so I have hypothesis on my site today. Any blog post has it by default with that code that I showed earlier. I would love aspirationally to go one step further and actually remove discuss from my site. So discuss is a kind of a third party of the commenting system that any site can put in with a little bit of JavaScript. They have a really great UX, but unfortunately are a problematic business that they stuff a whole bunch of tracking cookies into the JavaScript. They also inject ads. Occasionally this is an ad that injects it on my website at one point, which I will leave you to understand whether that fits with my aesthetic or not. But, and this was just last night, I just put discuss into Twitter and grabbed a couple of just random, completely random tweets about discuss. So to emphasize the idea, there is a pent up frustration with them. They got acquired by an ad tech company one or two years ago, which I think is part of their demise, but there isn't really a good alternative. And in particular, commenting is a social contract of you need to be able to trust the commenting platform and recognize the commenting platform in order to use it. So when I'm on somebody else's site, if they have a commenting platform that I don't look, don't recognize or understand, I'm far less likely to use it. And that's what the value of discuss is that everyone recognizes it and quote unquote trusts it, at least as far as I know how to use it, I know where my comments are gonna go, I have an account, et cetera. And so, you know, much as I would love commenting to be solved by a thousand different solutions, actually there is a value in having a well recognized and well understood solution. And so one of the experiments that I wanna try next is actually getting rid of discuss comments on my site and replacing that bottom of the page comments experience with some kind of page notes from Hypothesis API call, which I haven't done yet, but have aspirations to at least experiment with and play with. Well, this brings me to, so I stole this from somebody's presentation, I forget their name, apologies. But this was kind of the, from yesterday, with the mental model of how Hypothesis kind of works in the different layers that are available. And I'd love to propose a new layer. Somewhere in between the idea of a group and the general public, so we're talking about public comments, public annotations, but that still, there is still some value in having some kind of light ownership or light oversight and management of Hypothesis annotations. And today, I actually learned yesterday there is such a thing as a publisher group or a publisher level that I didn't know about previously, which maybe solves some of the things that I'm about to talk about, but I would love for that to be available and for this to be a thing that bloggers can sign up for or engage with to the point where I can say, I want to know when people are leaving annotations on my work, I want a way to maybe moderate them, have some kind of experience around them, report on them, et cetera. And so in part of my quest, an interest in doing this, one of the biggest pieces that is missing is an alert system. There's no way that I know of today to get an alert when somebody leaves an annotation on my site, so I built one. So this code is, again, I told you I'm not a developer, this code runs inside of a Google spreadsheet using a thing called Google Scripts, which is one of the coding platforms that I'm most familiar with, which I guess says a little bit about who I am. And basically, this relies on a single API call here to a wildcard domain search, pulls back the latest annotations, if there are new annotations and it sends you an email. One of the great things about the way that this is built is that you can copy and paste this into your own Google spreadsheet and run your own version of this, and it sends using your email address to yourself. So there's no third party. By the time you copy and paste this code, it doesn't rely on me in any way, shape, or form. Also, it doesn't rely on any other mail server, which requires management and costs and oversight or anything, so this is a good kind of, I think, indie, small version of what people might need. This is an example of what it looks like, so you can see that this is a Google spreadsheet on the left that shows just the list of annotations that it's fetched in recently. And on the right is an email that I got yesterday from some annotations on my site. Is XLDRKP here right now? No, don't know who they are, but they left some annotations on my site and we had a little back and forth. So yeah, and so I have this set up now, which I feel like it's starting to round out this, using annotation as a layer, as a blogger, to both encourage them in the first place and then monitor and get alerted for them on the back end, assigned to feel like a bit of an end-to-end workflow. And I just wrote up this morning, so it's not very detailed, but this blog post here has a link to all of this code and everything. The presentation has it as well, but the blog post is there for you. And if you have any trouble setting it up or anything, then, or don't know how to use Google scripts, which are super easy to use, honestly, anyone can use them. Just give me a shout or send me a note or grab me after here. And that's kind of it. One last note, just maybe, especially given the spider web logo for the conferences, this is also one of my latest blog posts about a new mental model for blogging that I'm really excited to explore and I haven't really explored it yet, but suffice to say, watch this space for blog punk. That's all I got. Oh, Klon, here we are at the end, the very end of our day. Any questions? Oh, yeah, lining up. He's already asked a bunch. You can go ahead first. This is just for hypothesis, actually, but it's out of this. What will it take, technologically and or socially, for you to be the Disgust Box with a little H in the corner? Full stop. That's all I have. You can answer it tomorrow at the hack day. So Disgust is a growing nightmare, right? You have page notes. That's Disgust with a Q, you mean, right? Yeah, that nasty thing. And if you put a T on it, then it makes sense. Yeah, so just the box, hypothesis branded, makes a page note and discussions happen over there. Otherwise it looks just like it's not just like. Oh, the H key is not working. Sorry. Like Friday. Right, yeah, exactly. All right, I could. Is that what you're saying? All right. This is the Disgust Box right here for those that aren't familiar with it. It's just a piece of JavaScript that gets called in. Yeah. Why is my picture on there? Because it's logged in, I presume, with... It's not my... Not my computer, sorry. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The editing's that bad. So the experiment that I want to have is displaying the page notes from hypothesis at the bottom of the page in a nice kind of format that looks something like this. But I don't think my coding skills are good enough to have the little start the Disgust Box that will post a page note when you leave the comment. I don't have the skills for that, so. Yeah. So we think a lot about annotations as, you know, like marginal notes, but you talked a lot about annotations as links and building threads. One of the things that's difficult for me is when you find something, you're like, oh yeah, I want to link this to the other stuff that I wrote or this thing that somebody else wrote is finding that other thing. And then like, do you go say something back at that other site and link it back to the first one? Like, do you have a conceptual workflow or is that just something that needs to be worked on or? I mean, I have this wiki on my own site that I maintain with just like links of stuff and random notes, which is a conceptual model that I have for grabbing things and putting them in containers. I actually don't think there is, it's one of the reasons I think that everyone uses to-do apps and goes through many of them, is not because the to-do apps suck, but because everyone's mental model of to-dos is different. And so they need to find a thing that matches their workflow. And I think it's the same for archiving information, creating knowledge, making notes. I think everyone has a slightly different mental model for it. One thing I did see, which maybe is interesting, is there has been research done, totally blanking on the name that I can send you after, but I think it came out of MIT, but it was about how people use digital tools to store and remember things, so collecting and archiving things, and that files and folders is the best way to do it. Yeah, I've heard the same. Yeah, they're better than tags. So people think the tags are good, but when you actually put it to test and sit people down and ask them to remember something or find something they previously have left, that files and folders outperforms. And so that's why my wiki is quote unquote, files and folders, these are the folders, these are the files, because it allows me to, I can just about remember this number of folders in my head, but the tagging structure becomes unruly, it's far harder to memorize, and every time I see this, I'm reinforcing in my brain what this list is, whereas that's also not true for tagging in many ways. So anyway, just one observation maybe that don't be afraid to use files and folders for collecting things. I am that person who has a comment rather than a question. If you go back to your blog post where you talk about experimenting with annotation, Rob and I annotated it at almost exactly the same time, where we point to a way to have an icon to indicate that a page can be annotated and there are annotations on it. And the example that I showed is actually not hypothesis branded, although it would be cool if people felt inclined to do that. And then the other thing was... Not sure why, isn't showing the annotations on the page. I think it may be like your most recent blog post. Yeah, but this one should. And the annotations on that page like from extension install. The other blog post, the integrating annotations. Yes. Oh, okay. This one. That one. But I don't know why annotations are not showing up. Next to your browser bar, there's a little number in number four, maybe click there in that. But the JavaScript on my page should show these anyway. The annotation I made at least was toward the bottom. Yeah, just not showing for some reason. Something weird is going on. Anyway. Oh wait. Oh, here we are, here we are. So I have a screenshot of how someone else has done it. It's just, it says annotations, brutal bubble. And if you click on that, it opens the sidebar. It's not hypothesis branded at all. And then Rob actually linked to it a gist that shows how it could be done. That's maybe. This one mentioned thing, no. No, no, no. We're back to the room. Up further down. No, no, no, no. Sorry. And I scroll down that. Yeah, this one? No. Oh, this one? There we go. So what is this doing? This is the, oh, this is the button that opens there. Okay, cool, cool, cool. And then the other thing is if you or anybody else wants a publisher group, which is that default layer where you would have moderation privileges, and then you would also have an activity page where annotations would aggregate. Just email support at hypothesis, that is me, and we'll let you set up. Amazing, thank you. This might be the same question or comment. I was wondering, at one point in the working group, or in discussions around the working group, we had talked about the notion that a person should be able to be the curator of annotations on their page, or not necessarily the curator, but you would have a view of annotations that look things like ones that you've surfaced up from you should be able to be notified that there's been an annotation on your page, and you should be able to surface up other ones to become like premier content that you actually incorporate them in. And I don't know, has that gone anywhere with hypothesis? Can you, could I register my blog with hypothesis, a site that I own? Like I can register for Google Analytics. I can register my site and say I own this. I put a little thing on there that proves that I own it.  The answer is, the answer is, that's a thing we should totally do, but it doesn't exist yet. So there's no way for someone to say, I am to basically prove that they are the owner of a particular page. And therefore, I mean, the line we've normally usually taken is that if you own a page, you should be able to control the default view that people see. So for example, like instead of the public layer showing up, you might have a different layer that's one you control. That's typically we found the thing that publishers really care about is that it's OK to have the public layer there somehow, or if you're logged in, or for someone who's logged in to use their own private groups. But what they really care about is like, what's the thing that people see by default if they're logged out? But I mean, if people contact Caitlin, then we can set something up for sites on a basis. But then we obviously we have to establish via some of them. That's right. OK, great. Sorry for not involving in that conversation. I would only land a plus one and say, yes, like a little. There's lots of other tools that work that way with a little meta tag or something that proves that I own it and then that validation. Cool. Thank you.


Hello and welcome. In this last tutorial that is tutorial number 4, we will look at the optimal staging configuration solution using the Lagrange multiplier method and we will understand the solution steps involved in the process. So, let us begin. Let us begin our discussion with the simplified problem of equal stages. So, in this case, let us consider a two stage sounding rocket which has a structural ratio for both the stages as 0.2. Let us try and determine the optimal stage payload ratios that is pi s and the lift of mass m naught for an m star or the payload of 20 kg, if the ideal burnout velocity required in this case is 6000 meters per second and it is burning a propellant of I sp equal to 200 seconds. So, let us start the solution. So, we first calculate the parameter beta which is nothing but V star divided by n g naught I sp where V star is the desired velocity and are the number of stages and I sp are the specific impulses. So, when we substitute these we get beta as 1.5 to 9 0. Here you must keep in mind the fact that as we are going to use exponential functions the number of significant digits have to be sufficient in order for us to capture the accuracy from such manipulations otherwise we may get an erroneous solution. So, in this case we have gone up to 4 decimal places and then we calculate the stage payload ratio that is pi 1 and pi 2 as e to the power minus beta minus epsilon divided by 1 minus epsilon. In the present case the epsilon is 0.2 and when we perform this calculation we find that the two stage payload ratios are 0.0209 fairly small value. Next we talk about the mission payload fraction pi star which is nothing but the stage payload ratio raised to the power n where n is number of stages. So, in this case as there are two stages we get 0.0209 square which is 0.00044 and from this using the payload requirement of 20 kg we find that the lift of mass is 45610 kg or 45.6 tons. What it means is that our payload efficiency in this case is very small. So, just to launch a 20 kg payload you are going to require a 45 tons rocket. Let us now look at problem of a two stage rocket again with the equal stages, but this time we use the payload as the constraint saying that payload is very small. Let us try and find out what is the burnout velocity that we can get but and also we have this time increase the ISP from 200 to 350. So, we have improved the structure from 0.2 to 0.1 so it has become more efficient it can carry more propellant and we have improved the ISP from 200 to 350 and we also have a requirement of a significantly higher payload ratio of 0.1 and we also have a significantly higher requirement of payload of 100 kg. Now indirectly what we are saying is that we do not want the rocket lift of mass to be more than 1 ton as against the 45 tons that we saw in the previous case we would like our rocket mass to be only 1 ton but we are willing to sacrifice the burnout velocity. Let us proceed with the solution. So, in this case the equal stage payload ratio from our formula that we have seen in the lectures is square root of pi square which is square root of 0.1 and we find that the stage payload ratios have to be 0.316. Now with this stage payload ratio we find that B star or the ideal burnout velocity which is minus g0 ISP into number of stages ln of epsilon plus 1 minus epsilon pi if we substitute these numbers we find that we get a velocity of 6561.7 meter second which is a surprise. If we compare these two problems we find that in the previous problem a structural efficiency or ratio of 0.2 and an ISP of 200 when it was changed to such a efficiency of 0.1 and the ISP of 350 we are able to launch a 100 kg payload with 1 ton rocket and which also has a velocity which is higher than 6000 meters per second which obviously means that by small increases in the structural efficiency and small increases in propulsion technology it is possible for us to significantly improve the efficiency of mission and you will find that the optimization techniques that we talk about essentially aim to look at slightly better structure slightly better propulsion in order for us to have significantly better gains in terms of the launch cost which is typically expressed in terms of the payload fraction which is so many kgs of payload per kg of lift of mass. Let us now move over to a problem where we are going to have unequal stages which means the stages are not exactly equal. So, in this case I have taken a three stage rocket which has marginally different ISPs and also marginally different structural efficiencies or structural ratios. You will find that these are typically the numbers that we would be getting in most practical rocket configurations and our objective is to determine the stage wise payload ratios which will maximize the mission payload ratio such that a 122 kg payload is given a velocity of 7800 meters per second. In this context it might be worth noting that the velocity which is specified in this problem corresponds to the spacecraft forming a circular orbit at 200 kilometer altitude. So, this is how the spacecraft mission requirements would appear in the form of rocket configuration design. Let us proceed with the solution. So, first let us look at the basic formulation. So, let us recall the solution for the stage payload ratio in the present case which is minus epsilon i divided by 1 minus epsilon i into 1 plus lambda G naught ISPI where lambda is the Lagrange multiplier and using the parameters that have been specified in the previous slide. Let us now write down pi 1, pi 2 and pi 3 in terms of lambda. So, pi 1 is minus 0.142 divided by 0.856 into 1 plus 2658.5 into lambda which is nothing but this is the G naught ISP. Similarly, for pi 2 we get minus 0.157 divided by 0.843 into 1 plus 2580 lambda and pi 3 is minus 0.134 by 0.866 into 1 plus 2589.8 lambda. The next step is to bring in the velocity constraint relation. So, here I suggest that you go and look up in the lecture the velocity constraint relation which is given as V star equal to minus G naught sum over ISPI into ln of epsilon i lambda G naught ISPI divided by 1 plus lambda G naught ISPI. This is the expression that you can verify from the lecture. What we do is we substitute the applicable parameters into that expression and we do one more step. We divide the left hand side that is the velocity with minus G naught and also divide by the ISP 1 that is 271. So, if we do that on the left hand side we are going to get minus 2.937 and then on the right hand side what we are going to get will be the ratios of the two ISPs with the ISP 1 and that resulting ratio of the two stages is 0.945. This you can independently verify and then of course, we have epsilon 1 G naught ISP 1, epsilon 2 G naught ISP 2 and epsilon 3 G naught ISP 3 as the numerator and 1 plus G naught ISP lambda for first stage 1 plus G naught ISP 2 lambda and 1 plus G naught ISP 3 lambda. So, this is now the constrained relation that we must first solve to generate the value of the Lagrange multiplier lambda. Let us now look at how we are going to get this. So, what we do is first of all we remove the natural logarithm from right hand side by taking the exponential on the left hand side that gives us 0.0532 and then of course, we perform all those multiplications. So, we start getting large numbers. Here again I must emphasize the need to retain all the significant digits because as large numbers are involved any truncation of number here is going to lead to large errors. So, you see that when we expand the denominator we are retaining the terms of the almost up to eighth or ninth decimal place so that the significant digits are all retained in the expansion. This results in the following cubic algebraic equation in lambda that is 1.681754 into the power 10 lambda q plus 204 to 5597.3 lambda square plus 7828.3 lambda plus 1 equal to 0. Now, any standard numerical solver can be used including MATLAB to extract the roots. Please note that as this is the cubic equation there are going to be three roots of which only one of them will be the valid or the feasible solution root. So, in this case we find that the one real root lambda is minus 0.6145 into 10 to the power minus 3 while the other two roots appear in the form of a complex conjugate and hence they are invalid. What we now do is take this value of lambda and go back to these three expressions of pi 1, pi 2 and pi 3. Now, you can clearly see that lambda is a negative quantity. So, when you multiply this you are going to get a minus number which is greater than 1 that can be confirmed. So, this denominator will become negative this negative will cancel the numerator and we will get a positive value number for pi 1, pi 2 and pi 3 as shown below. So, pi 1 turns out to be 0.262, pi 2 turns out to be 0.318 and pi 3 turns out to be 0.262. We multiply all these three to get pi star which is 0.0218 and from this we can calculate the lift of mass for 122 kg payload as about 5600 kg. Hi. So, in this problem we have seen that unequal stages problem where both epsilon and ISPs are different in different stages. The numerical effort is primarily in setting up the equation for the Lagrange multiplier lambda and you will find that the order of that equation will be equal to the number of stages and that setting up that problem and numerical solution will require some effort which is significantly larger than when we have equal stages. Now, I will make a suggestion to all of you. Take problem number 3 the way we have defined and look at the structural ratio same for all the three stages as the geometric mean of the three values given in this example which means we have given epsilon 1, epsilon 2, epsilon 3. You multiply all the three take cube root that is the geometric mean and use this in all the three stages. Similarly, take the three ISP values and take their arithmetic mean that is some all of these and divide by 3. Please note these actions carefully and now assuming that these are to be used as constants for all the three stages generate the solution of the stages in terms of the bias for all the three stages and check that value with respect to the geometric mean of the three pi values that we have obtained in this problem. I am sure you will get some surprising results. I hope you can go on to this journey and discover that how the simplified formulations and solution techniques that we have developed for optimal configuration can provide realistic and practical rocket configurations with not much computational effort. With that we come to the end of this tutorial. So, bye and thank you.


To security matters now, Representative Ben Ibagpa, PDP Delta on Tuesday in Abuja, challenged President Muhammad Ubarri to name the particular lawmaker sponsoring terrorism in the country. He raised a motion on the matters of privilege on the floor of the house in respect to the President's 61st Independence Anniversary Speech. In his speech, the President reportedly alleged that a National Assembly member is sponsoring the sessionist. Ibagpa narrated his experience since the President made the allegation is that he could no longer gain access to some important places. On Saturday, I had to honor an invitation to Ghana for a wedding. Mr. Speaker, it will amaze you what I face in the hands of Ghanaian officials. I go there, they kept me for about four hours that they're trying to confirm something. I stayed at the airport for four hours, missed the wedding that I went there for, and at the end of the day, one of the woke up to me and said, sir, we're sorry, because there's an announcement in Nigeria that a member of parliament is sponsoring terrorism. We are put on red alert to ensure that no member of parliament from Nigeria come here to hide or to cause trouble. Mr. Speaker, I had to come back home, dejected. I lose my respect and my privilege as a privileged member of these chambers. Mr. Speaker, they have been calling me all over the world. My friends have been telling me who among you is that person sponsoring terrorism. Mr. Speaker, the writing for a father to do, Mr. President, the father of the country today, the writing for any father to do is to name and shame any child that is bringing about division or anything that will affect the family. But Mr. President did not shame that person, he did not name them. Instead, he named 469 members.


Welcome into the Jason Taney show. I'm Joe Wamba joined now with Jason Taney head coach of the baseball team coach You guys play a lot of games this weekend, you know But splitting them in series that you really needed talk a little bit about you know, what went wrong. Yeah Yeah, and on Saturday we split a series with hood and you know give hood credit They made a good comeback there in the second game won the first game four to three Behind Dan Williams pitching a good game second game You know, we're up seven to seven to four going into the last inning and you know We have a couple hiccups make couple mistakes and unfortunately that led to a comeback By hood and then they took the lead going to the bottom seventh And we loaded the bases with one out bottom seventh had a chance and unfortunately You know they turned a crucial double play and ended the game on it. So yeah, it was a challenge Yeah, those double plays whether you make them or don't can't or hit into them can be you know, either You know stint of momentum or drive you into momentum. How do you overcome that? Yeah, they can be game-changing So yeah, and then in that game we had a chance to turn one ourselves and we talked about momentum you know that would ended the game and at that point they didn't have any runs in that inning so that momentum obviously shifted on us and As a team we weren't able to recover from it So so I don't know how to answer that question because we don't always recover from those situations and You know, unfortunately on Sunday, we had a similar situation and a similar outcome And we recover from that in the second game to win a second game But yeah, those are tough, you know momentum momentum is in baseball is really interesting We always say momentum to your next day starting pitcher, but within a game there are momentum shifts Absolutely, and I'm making big defensive plays are a big part of that as you guys move forward in the rest of the conference schedule, of course, you're gonna be playing on Thursday and a double header on Friday this week and a very important series as You're gonna be battling a team that you're neck-and-neck with in the standings right now. Yeah, this conference is kind of strange this year We have two really powerful teams at the top that are Putting some wins on the board against the lower-end teams And then Austin, Lebanon Valley, you know, we're sitting there, you know neck-and-neck I would say to you earlier, you know, we're in a little bit of a rebuilding year because of so many seniors We had last year and so we're pleased to be in this position We'd like to be a little better position because we had our opportunities, but Yeah, to be to be neck-and-neck with Lebanon Valley, you know depending on today's outcome. They play messiah today You know messiah wins will actually be tied for fourth place with Lebanon Valley going to the series Lebanon Valley wins will be one game behind them going into the series I got the best news though, and we keep telling our team this the best news is We own our destiny. Yeah, we're in complete control of our destiny If we win the series and left on the schedule, which we're capable of doing then we're fine We just need to we need to do that and we've shown promise. We've said we we've started to hit the ball a lot better here in the last couple days I think the warm weather helps, but we've shown the promise there We just need to put it all together, and I honestly I said it I think I said it last week I'm hoping the momentum and The fact that we're starting to play a little better now Leads us through the last three weeks of season and into the conference tournament conference tournaments are won by teams that are hot Not necessarily the best team the team that's the hottest, right? So we're hoping will be the hottest team going into the tournament you guys definitely were pretty hot last week You guys were on a little bit of a win streak and then a little Bumbles in the bullpen a little bit.  Well, you know, it's it's interesting because you know last week even though we had won five in a row And our team knew this we had this discussion. We didn't particularly play well. Mm-hmm. We were not hitting the ball very well So we were we were finding ways to win ball games, which was great We'd like to find ways when ball games ball playing. Well, it'd be nice You know, so we're hoping to get back on that streak a little bit like I said this weekend We definitely hit the ball a lot better against Lynchburg and hood So we see that coming along we are gonna make a couple adjustments in our pitching staff Our bullpen has been has been a struggle this year. It's just there's no way around it It's been a struggle. So we're gonna make a couple adjustments and hopefully going into this series We'll be a little stronger in the pen And then stronger in the next weekend as well And then those guys would have experience if you guys would make the playoffs and have a playoff run Yeah, we the adjustments we're making you know, we're gonna we're gonna play with our rotation a little bit We've got we got a we got a couple guys that are hot starters right now and You know, even yesterday we have one of our our relievers. They're five innings in relief And only throw one one inning all year and five innings and through through the ball terrific You know guys like that, you know are stepping up and making some making making us Readjust some things But yeah, that we're hoping we're hoping that that'll lead us into the next next part of the season They're making you have to evaluate for the good not because of poor play or anything. Absolutely. Absolutely. We love that Yeah, you're right. Well, coach, we wish you the best of luck this week and good luck in these series you got coming up Thank you. He's Jason Taney. I'm Joe Wamba and this has been the Jason Taney show