The eventually the music will stop. That's a fact. Okay, it's happened to me During the internet craze during the bottoming effect of 2009 and happened to me in 2020 Eventually you're going to run into a euphoric solid Welcome to access a trader the number one community for those who are committed to taking control of their trading in order to achieve success Profitability and longevity. Thank you for joining us. Here's Dan Shapiro to help you find your edge master your process and own your future Hey guys give me everybody welcome to another edition of the access a trader calm a nightly Wrap-up show. Hope everybody is doing great. Hope everybody had a great Day of trading hope everybody just having a great life and that's the most important thing if you are brand new here Welcome aboard. We would like to invite you to like share subscribe So you can be part of the daily journey of the wonderful world of pivots and via Technical analysis, so let me know if you heard this before the market is strong, right? That's end of the video. Have a great night. See you smart Realistically, that's what it is But we have a little bit things to talk about prior to that CPI came out today The market liked the inflation numbers. They liked it so much that the S&P and Nasdaq have finished at a 13 month high. That's right to 2022 seem like it was the end of the world and that's like was down 31 percent What's going to change the markets going to a deep recession allegedly, right? We're going to go into depression. The world is over and there might be another pandemic. Oh boy. Oh boy Here we go. Here we go. Yada yada yada 13 month highs and the question is how long can this market sustain this rally? Again, if you've been watching this broadcast, especially for the last three weeks All I keep on saying is realistically like every day or every other day. Just give us one more day Just give us one more day. Just just give us one more day, right? Because again, it's such an incredible magic carpet ride and the aggression and the Exaggeration and some of these moves are phenomenal and and the recipe continues to be the same thing the daily chart comes along There's massive deep out of the money call Short-term expiration buying the fuses lit and then the stock absolutely explodes We'll get to the pivots in a second tomorrow. We have the Fed. Okay, again There's the medium consensus is they're going to leave rates Unchanged at least for one For one session. We'll see how the market reacts to that But the market continues to just go absolutely nuts. There's a rotation Doesn't make a difference what it is when stocks are coming out of the range.  I was up, you know 4 30 in the morning The the one it's like the gift in the curse You know, I've been up, you know, pretty much five, you know 4 30 5 o'clock in the morning Just because of these overnights you're getting the most, you know, sometimes you get the most exaggerated prices So my sleep habits have been held but you know, the action is so aggressive. So, you know last night Came in some Intel came in some Amazon this morning. I woke up 4 30 in the morning Everything was gapping up again ahead of the CPI number and I said hey basically guys sell 90% of your Intel Amazon or anything else anything else that you long at the open biggest challenge now is to find value with the rest of the day And that's exactly what we did. We actually found a lot of value and again What we'll talk about we'll talk about the individual Pivots in a second, but it is a broken record and again, sometimes you say to yourself well, you know, how long is this gonna last? Is this gonna be forever and I promise you I give you my word the the biggest euphoric markets I've traded the internet craze the 2009 bottom generational bottom the 2020 pandemic run it all ends it does and it doesn't mean it ends goes into a back bear market And we're gonna be in a bear market for the next five years all it just means it's gonna slow down okay, it's gonna slow down and You're going to run into cycles of normality and basically what that means is instead of NVIDIA putting up an $11 candle Maybe puts up just a $2 candle and people are gonna be like so disappointed when that finally happens But that's what I'm not a normal market and I was I was joking around with one of our guys say I think it was David You start hearing abnormal things with exaggerated markets So for example, I hear people now talk about all the time Dan. I'm running out of buying power. That's not a normal thing That's a good thing, right? That's an absolutely great thing and cheers to all you guys I've had the same conversation with but that's not a normal thing You don't run out of buying power in a normal market and that's the exaggeration point That is it really the epitome of what a euphoric market is but hey, how can you not love it, right?  I get it But how can you not love it? So, you know, look, it's the same plan going into every single day Take the stock that is coming out of a range take the stock with the option flow Take the stock that's coming out of either bottom range or a tight middle range after the consolidation Get long above the channel and hopefully the options market will bail you out and that's exactly what we saw Going into today's trading day. I woke up like 4 30 in the morning Amazon was up nearly three. Of course you make sales. That's the whole point guys And you hear these questions all the time that I get a lot of you guys are still brand new If you're taking the risk overnight You don't need to you know, you don't need to sit there to wait till the open to sell your stock Right, I get it some of you guys are trading on the option side But you could short sell the underlining security to kind of start pairing you out and gains But that's the whole point when you get a gap up if you're taking on the necessary risk Think to take a stock that has potential over what I gap of you sell that gap Oh, right you keep a runner and you let the runner do the heavy lifting for you If the runner keeps on going in the next couple days God bless if the market if the market stops out your runner at your break-even point You did your job But you're either supposed to get stopped out or your stock supposed to get measured potential But either way you did your job in this type of environment when you get you know When you wake up and I got three dollars on Amazon and I got a dollar seventy on Intel I'm like, yo, it's it's phenomenal It's absolutely phenomenal and you take your money use break even as you stop and start looking for other Opportunities so going into tomorrow. I mean look at the at-dexes right again You might get one more stretch into this 366 level probably run into a little bit of supply on the cues again It's so hard to find value up here, but that's our job, right? We talked about this all the time That is our absolute job going into every single trading day the IWM Since the breakout since the breakout above 182 that we talked about which was an awesome awesome movie I like this thing this thing went from 182 to basically 189 in five sessions. That's a very very good healthy market You look at the SPYs Again just an orbit, you know somebody asked me was the next, you know, where's the next supply for this thing? I said look up I mean obviously joking around but look up it's just it's the sky and these stocks are just absolutely in orbit And the problem is eventually the the music will stop and the question is are you going to have a plan a contingency plan To make sure that you have a seat, right? They have a chair for the musical chair game again I know it feels great. It's wonderful Especially if you're a brand new trader in this type of environment and you're catching your first wave But I give you as I tell you on my children This is will end one day whether it's tomorrow whether it's three weeks from now Maybe it may be two years from now Who knows but eventually again You always have to put yourself in a position that you're buying on the first floor again If you're a brand new viewer Into this child buying from the first floor versus buying from the 12th floor on the first floor You're buying out of a tight range that can solidate for at least two three weeks Maybe a couple of months and if you fail you fail for pennies if you're buying it up here, right? If your first trade tomorrow is the spi up here After a run-up right after this whole big run-up here.  Maybe you don't but the point is why jump off the 12th floor when you're still having some value Or at least a good amount of value still stocks coming out of the bottom In the middle of ranges this market got so good just to give you an idea AMC Right was a cult classic. You guys remember all AMC, right? It's going to 3000. It's going to 12 000 It's going to a million. It's going to 8 million. I'm not selling it before it goes to 38 000. It's a five dollar stock What's olreax, right? It's a five dollar stock But even this salt of the earth, right?  I know you guys some of you guys are attached to this. I don't know why but okay Right if this crap starts going starts confirming the 50 day moving average and again I would never even even remotely suggest even looking at this thing for a trade when there's other stocks breathing and walking the earth But if my point is if this stock starts confirming the 50 day moving average It really does show you how great and aggressive the speculation money flow Is in this market and continues to be so you guys remember a couple of days ago I was looking for that blow off trade this setup, right?  What am I crazy looking for a blow off top right again? Blow off top usually means it's going to take out the previous day's low I've been waiting for this previous day low for three days and literally the last three days are the only times I've not traded tesla in this whole run up on this move up But hey, this thing looks like you know, they're coming for for the 265 270 weeklies This thing is out of out of its mind and obviously because of the euphoria, you know I'm gonna miss I'm gonna miss the next move, but you know what it's okay. It's okay On the video keeps on just going out of its mind as well We talked about in the video last night Repeat buyers guys and we'll get to the to the some option flow In a second, but we'll start with the video Mass of 420 calls is coming in 420 weeklies 420 weeklies. We started talking about in the video yesterday Getting above this range here. It stood above this range and now it looks like you know, they there's a shot This thing starts testing the 420 Top of the range highs from the highest from made the 30th again the relentless buying today of the weekly 420 calls here are some names that had massive option flow guys AI we had an incredible pivot on AI. Okay, what I mean incredible pivot. You see this move Yeah, I think that's a that's a call for incredible when the stock was at 38 and a half They started coming non-stop for the 44 Weeklies non-stop one after another and after another and once the stock took out this 3940 again We'll get to the pinnets in a second. This thing was just an absolute monster exploded Look at a name for example like rivian, right? We've been talking about rivian rivian filing woke up today Right woke up today. Again, they can constantly coming forward the 17 and a half July calls all it just needs to do is just take out one more channel. You see this whole channel here Going back to april if it could just get above this channel here. Why not? Why can't this thing go uh to 16 bucks? intel I still have a runner small runner on intel again the highest close In this whole formation here Um AI we talked about letter u right letter u as well again another name That woke up today. It's got rejected off the top of the range here But keep an eye on letter u they were coming for the 40 and a half weeklies the 41 weeklies If this thing could just get above this channel here in the next couple of days, who knows? Maybe this thing Wakes up as well other than that. Uh, apple got a downgrade today You know really only down 50 cents AI AMD had its uh had its uh AI day today again This is kind of my whole point when you have big big run-ups and you're still constantly buying stock buying stock Even regardless if there's an event or not they're gonna sell the stock off again This is a perfect example of buying stock on the 12th floor. You don't need it Here was the breakout. Here was the breakout. Here is the continuation. This is just all Ridiculous and again, I'm not saying AMD can't go higher than near future But my point is if you're buying a stock 30 points away from its breakout level There's always a higher probability that it'll come back harder Uh than the point of reference than it originally did so you got to be very very Careful for that. So again our goal for tomorrow. Look for tight channels, right really tight channels Let me give you guys some ideas for tomorrow and then we'll get to the pivots really quickly Uh, let me give you guys some pivots. Look look at marvel. Okay marvel had a really nice quarter Again semi conductor has been super duper hot had a really nice quarter came in If marvel could just get above this channel here You see this high here on june the seventh if they could just start getting above this june seven Candle here this thing could wake up keep an eye on this thing bb i o another name I'm not really familiar with but honestly. What do you need to be familiar with look at this? Look at this. How long this distribution channel is it's going back to april right and if they can get above this distribution channel This bb i o uh can wake up as well. So keep an eye on that Obviously, we're still watching uh you really good-looking channel there. I'm watching for rivian For a second day play there as well. Obviously look If tesla gives us a light volume open a light volume open I'll talk about starts imploding until a light volume open into rise and support and it holds I mean listen is this worth a shot for a balance in the video as well But the last thing I want to do is just keep on chasing these prices chasing these prices My last sale my last sale on tesla three days ago was in the 40s the stock right now is a 260 It's mentally mentally. I can't buy and I know it's going higher You know, it's telling me for you know, it's telling me now for the last three days Since i'm waiting for a backside test which is not coming It's telling me it's going high the options market is going me high I just can't mentally wrap my head around buying the stock up 14 days in a row The same stock that I just sold three days ago $18 lower, which is out of its mind But god bless if you're still riding this thing, uh great great job. I mean absolutely a great job So let's talk about the pivots today. Again, my first thing this was like a five o'clock in the morning Guys sell 90% of your amazon intel or anything else that you have Our biggest challenge today is finding you know finding the value for the rest of the day We found the value we found the value got really aggressive very very quickly Chewy 39 and needs to build here was chewy which I think we talked about chewy last night on the video Chewy finally got above this channel here ran up about a buck nice move there still looks higher Uh apple if it shakes off the downgrade needs to be 184 it got rejected at 184. I wasn't even watching apple Gtlb 4980. I wasn't watching gtlb either Uh 4980. Let's oh, yeah, it broke out. Yeah 4980. It got above the 4980 went to 51 If you if you took this as a trade, I didn't uh, but good job. Good job. Not something I really trade here. Uh rivian a nice little pop here 1490 15 needs to build here was rivian again Those 1750 call buyers continue to come in Popped into the 15 into the 1540s now. I just need to get above this channel here to see north of 16 letter you went nuts 1737 90 38 needs to build again 41 weeklies coming in 38 when you know took out this whole 38 channel here Got rejected the 39 50 level. This is where it needs to reclaim To go higher You know like a here we go 39 40s on deck from 38. This was definitely the move of the day I caught this thing for about a dollar 60 dollar 70 in a matter of minutes And oh by the way, this thing went up another five Right a 39 40 rejected three times needs to build. Uh ai was just great Ai was great. So here's the 39 40 see these two candles here the high here on june the 7th was 39 40 The high from june the 9th was 39 40 So once it got above the 39 40 this damn thing went to 46 It's an absolute amazing amazing move on ai I go 42 on deck try 46 on deck Later rivian 15 30s next supply which it absolutely went and I believe that is it. So that's it guys That's it. Uh market continues Uh to go nuts again guys remember, uh, the eventually the music will stop. That's a fact. Okay It's happened to me uh during the internet craze during the bottoming effect of 2009 and happened to me in 2020 Eventually you're going to run into a euphoric Solid wall and unfortunately most traders won't realize it and they'll give back three months worth of gains Within a couple of days. We don't want that to happen Always trade with confidence always trade with conviction But always trade responsible guys. God bless everybody. Stay blessed. Stay happy and I'll see you all tomorrow. Take everybody


The only way to get closure from the narcissist. The only way to get a sense of resolution and conclusion from the narcissist. The only way they will give you the feeling that the emotional and traumatic experience has been resolved. Narcissists do not give closure. They leave your questions unanswered. They leave you in a state of confusion and uncertainty. They never take accountability for their actions. They never tell you why they did what they did. One day they just disappear without any reason or explanation for why they're gone. And maybe you see a picture on social media or you hear about it from a family member or mutual friend. You discover that they're with someone else. And you're led to believe that they're so much happier with this new person as though it's so different than it was with you. They could never be that way with you, but now they can be that way with someone else.  They're giving them everything that they were held from you and then they're giving this information to your family member or mutual friend. Or they're posting it up on social media because they're intending to hurt you. They're intending to cause harm to you. It's emotional abuse. They're devaluing you. They're trying to make you feel like you're nothing. And this new person is so much better than you because you could never make them happy. Nothing you did was ever good enough. So they're already expecting you to blame yourself.  That's what it's designed to do to you. But try not to let this affect you. Don't fall for these misleading impressions. It's not real. It's an orchestration. They planned and coordinated the elements of the situation to reduce their desired effect. You just need to recognize that it is an illusion. You need to recognize that you were dealing with a narcissist. They didn't give you closure because then it left the door open for them to come back to you. They put you on the shelf so that they could keep track of you in case they wanted to return. They didn't give you closure because they're emotionally stunted at the level of a two-year-old child and you were that child's toy which is why one minute they loved you and then the next minute they ignored you out of boredom. They don't understand the idea of a mature reciprocal relationship. They're self-absorbed and they lack empathy. They think the world is meant to rove around their needs, not yours. They are an emotionally immature toddler in an adult body who is not aware of or concerned about the needs of other people. When the narcissist doesn't give you closure, it should reveal to you who and what you're dealing with because there's only three types of people who refuse to give closure. Narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths. People who are very manipulative. People who take advantage of your kindness. If a person refuses to give you closure, that should tell you everything you need to know. It should tell you who they are. It should reveal to you that they are incapable of genuine empathy or connection. It should reveal to you that they just see people as objects to be used and that's your closure right there. They've already given it to you. What they do carries more weight than what they say. Their actions show their true intentions. The only way to get closure from a narcissist is to look at their actions. Just look at how they're treating you. They're gaslighting you. They're making you doubt your reality so that they can control you. They're devaluing you. They leave you feeling like you're less than them. But when this happens, you need to notice it and recognize that someone is making you feel this way. You're not experiencing these emotions on your own. They are inducing these emotions in you. They're causing you to feel that way because they want you to think they're more valuable than you are which should tell you everything you need to know. It should give you the closure that you need and it's the same thing when they compare you to other people.  They're portraying it as though this other person can't do anything wrong as though they're above you which isn't true but that's what they're telling you which is more closure again and sometimes the narcissist will lead you on. By dropping small amounts of interest they might give you an occasional message or phone call a small arrangement or social media interaction which should tell you that they're not really committed to you but they just want to keep you as a backup plan if something else fails. Sometimes the narcissist won't give you any interest at all. They will ghost you and they won't give you a reasonable explanation. They will just disappear as though it's not even worth their time which should tell you that your feelings don't mean anything to them. It should tell you that you're not important to the narcissist. They may stick around but without having any emotional investment in you which should tell you that they're just using you. They're just biding their time until they get bored or until they find someone else but they never really tell you these things directly which causes you to second guess yourself. It causes you to question their actions and decisions but actions speak louder than words. What they do is more important than what they say so this should give you the closure that you need. You should recognize that you deserve better. You deserve to be treated with love and respect. Thank you for watching. I hope this video resonates with you. Please like, comment, share and subscribe. If you would like to donate my PayPal link is in the video description. Coaching inquiries. You can email me at coaching at naksafiver.co.uk. Thank you for watching and I'll talk to you soon.


From New York, it's theCube. Covering Escape 19. So everyone, welcome back to theCube coverage here in New York City for the inaugural multi-cloud event called Escape 19. This is a unique event where industry leaders are coming together to discuss and have conversations around what is multi-cloud, what does it even mean, how it will be laid out. It's really a foundational set of conversations and talks around it. Our next guest is Spoonz, known as Spoonz, that's his real name, but that's his nickname. He's the co-founder and CTO of LightStep, CUBE alumni in the past. We've interviewed them at CUBECon. Spoonz, thanks for coming on. Pleasure to be here. So first of all, your company's been, really has a lot of tech chops. We've interviewed your partner, Ben, before the CUBE. So much is going on in microservices. You can't even keep it straight these days. So take a minute to give an update on what's going on with LightStep real quick. Sure, sure. And why you're here. Yeah, I think what we're really trying to see is it's not just microservices, it's different cloud vendors, different third-party vendors that are really adding to the complexity, and that complexity really comes in the form of depth. I think people that are adopting microservices really feel it immediately, but for everyone else, it's a bit of a boiling frog situation. It comes on slowly. And I think where LightStep fits in is offering a simple solution for observing those systems, for understanding what's happening.  I mean, I recognize that people have multiple clouds, but there's no multi-clouding going on, per se. Yeah, we see a little bit with our customers. It's something where I think they think about it as a way to mitigate risks. It's a way for them to manage costs as well, so. Well, multi-vendor, I'm old enough to remember back in the 80s and 90s where you didn't want just IBM, or you didn't want just DEC, you wanted multiple vendors in there because more heterogeneous is better. Better IT. So now we're seeing that with cloud. This is not BS, this is real. So this is where I see multi-cloud being foundational. How do you see the architecture of enterprises where they're small, medium, growing, either born in the cloud, cloud native, or hybrid IT, hybrid dev building their own stacks? How should they be thinking about architecting for multi-cloud? Yeah, so I think that's one of the choices they have to make. And a lot of what I think they're trying to do is really allow teams to work more independently. So that might be that they can make their own choices about cloud, about vendors. It might be that they make their own choices about languages, frameworks, things like that. As they do that, they're building up this depth. And what that means is that there's a heterogeneity to that system. And really the problem there is that you've got a responsibility for the whole stack. You've got responsibility for everything from your service all the way down. Those all impact your performance. You only got control over your service itself. And so managing that tension is really where the pain comes in for a lot of developers today. You know, I've got to ask you a question. You're multiple degrees in computer science, entrepreneur, you're in the business. It's certainly a very rapid wave. It's really strong. And more waves are coming, bigger waves. You know, observability, network management becomes observability, configuration management becomes automation, RPA's the hottest trend, automating everything. So a lot of action going on with cloud scale, enterprises are just trying to vector in and figure that out.  And we kind of missed it. I mean, we covered it, but I missed that whole breakout. Whoa, what is this whole new category? What's going on? I think a lot of people miss it. I think it's easy to think about the orchestration, about the automation as the most important thing, because that's sort of in the critical path. But you have to have that to keep going. And it's easy to kind of think that your monitoring tools from, you know, 10, 20 years ago are still working. And I think what we realized when we were at Google and what we brought to LightStep is that they're not working anymore. That you've really got to rethink and you've got to put context that allows you to see that whole stack and not just think about individual machines, individual processes, but really understand it from a user's point of view, from your customer's point of view. I mean, it started to see tracing as a feature, but observability is now almost its own practice. Yeah. How should we think about holistic, how should people think holistically about observability from a technical standpoint? Yeah, so really, of course, you're going to need some logging, you're going to need metrics, but you really need those things to be put in context. You need to understand how they're affecting, affecting individual users, individual or segments of users. And so tracing is really the backbone of that context. It allows you to understand how a particular transaction passes through that system. If you don't have that, you're just going to get buried in this sea of data, whether that's logs or metrics or whatever. Tracing is really the thing that allows you to understand what's important and to filter, to aggregate and to really hone in on what can affect it. So that rabbit hole or that net or the drowning in that, as you said, but I feel like you said it was nice, is essentially rabbit hole. You can almost get stuck down there. Absolutely. And so you're getting much more real time. You also said contextual. So when I think of contextual, I'm thinking about, okay, I have to be integrated into the app and or I have access to data. So how does that work? Yeah, so really data comes from a lot of different sources and you need to get a way to integrate those things that can come from machine layer, from the infrastructure layer, but from the application itself as well. And we've partnered with some others to put together open telemetry, which is an open standard for getting the data out of the application. This comes on the heels of open tracing and a couple of other things. But that's really an open standard that allows application developers, allows framework developers to really open that spigot and get the data out of the application. Just to get your personal thoughts on the industry, there's a lot of, I have a lot of conversations with folks around, you know, we're the control plane for data. I mean, can there ever be a control plane? Is there an open, is Kubernetes going to be that, I guess, abstraction where everyone kind of has their own little land grab of control plane? Because data horizontal scalability makes sense. Why not? Yeah, there's a lot of different kinds of data and not all data is equally valuable. So the way that you think about data that's driving your revenue, like that's one thing, that the way that you're thinking about debugging your application, that's another thing. And I think you probably need more than one tool to handle that. It's just not going to be cost effective. And there's a home of the level of context right there. Exactly, exactly. So thinking about contextual and having integration points is probably a good starting point for someone who's kind of thinking about reassembling for multi-cloud. Yep, yep. All right, so what do you think about this conference multi-cloud first inaugural kind of true multi-cloud conference about multi-cloud only? Yeah, a lot of great people here. It's exciting. Yeah, cool. Thanks for coming on. Appreciate it, Spoon. Yeah, updates, give a plug for LightStep. Take a quick second to explain what you guys are looking for, what you're doing, give an update. Yeah, so LightStep's simple observability for deep systems. Deep systems come about through things like microservices, but we have a lot of customers that are still working on a monolith or just stepping away from monolithic architecture. And really, observability means not just logs, not just metrics, but really providing that context through things like tracing that allow you to release faster, get those features out there, and at the same time, reduce mean times resolution, reduce mean time to innocence, right? Really making sure that your teams are able to understand who's at fault and who can fix the problems that you're seeing. And you guys recruiting, looking for people? Always recruiting on the engineering side, design, products, go to market, all those things, yep. Everyone's hiring. They get people these days. It is, it is. A lot of open jobs out there. Hey, thanks for coming on and sharing your insights. See you around the neighborhood in Silicon Valley, and we'll see you at KubeCon. Great, thanks. All right, it's KubeCoverage here. I'm John Furrier, New York City for the first in all of Congress, Escape 19. This is the first industry gathering where the thought leaders of people who are making things happen are having conversations and talks around what is multi-cloud and laying down that foundation and headroom for more solutions. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching.


Okay, I'm going to go ahead and call the LINE IT 2021 Water Board meeting to order. Heather, can we do the roll call? Tom Williams. Here. Allison Gould. Here. Tom Duster. Here. Scott Holbeck. Here. Roger Lane. Here. Ken Newsom. Present. Nelson Tipton. No. Kevin Bowden. Chris Jeff. Here. Jason Elkins. No. Dicca Velmo. Here. Councilmember Martin. Here. We have a quorum. Great. Thank you, Heather. So item three is the approval of the previous month's minutes. June 21st, 2021 meeting minutes. Everybody had a chance to look at those. Any questions, comments, or if not, we need a motion to approve those. So moved. The motion to read a second. Okay. An Allison second. Any second? Any further comment? Seeing none, all those in favor, say aye. Aye. Opposed? Okay. Mr. Chair, I was going to abstain from voting. I was in present last week. Okay. Thank you. I was going to say the same thing. Yeah. I'm sorry. I want to welcome Tom because this first meeting here too. So thank you. All right. So we're on to item five. Public invited to be heard in special presentations. Is there any? Okay. Item six. Gender revisions and submission of documents. Yeah. I have a couple just for the record. The chair asked me quite a while ago to hand out a straight line diagram, but this is our first in person meeting. So you probably already read it. I apologize, but I have a straight line diagram for everybody that I'll hand out later in the meeting. Also, when we get to item eight a, I have a handout potential change on the water supply agreement that I'll hand out and talk about at that point. Just a real quick update. Also, we just got our bond rating back from for the sale of the bonds. Part of the bonds are going to get for me project. We got a double A and a double A plus rating, which are really very good ratings. And that, that has those. So that's the last thing we need to do to get ready to sell the bonds. And so we'll be selling those later this morning. So we'll be selling those later this morning. So we'll be selling those later this morning. So that's the last thing we need to do to get ready to sell the bonds. And so we'll be selling those later this month. And then we'll let you know how they go and what do we get. But we're expecting a pretty decent bond sale because of good moderating that. That's everything. It's all the water board work over the years, the staff work. It's a good system. It's good financing, financial. So it was good to get there. That's all. Great. Good visions I have. Thank you. That's good news. Okay. With that, we're on to item seven, which is the development activity. Did you want me to do a quick water standards report? Oh yeah, I'm sorry. I jumped over that. Yeah. Before, why don't you go ahead and do that? Yeah. So the fall in the same brain of Lyons was 122 CFS with a 124 year average of 300 CFS. The call in the same brain is rough and ready ditch admin, 7,012 appropriation date, March 13th, 1869. Calling the main stem of the South Platte is Springdale ditch admin, 13,349. The priority date of July 19th, 1886. Same rain based on storage and beginning of July was at 90%. Alprize reservoir, Budrock was full and we're releasing approximately 50 CFS. Union reservoir is also near full and releasing 10 CFS. That's all I have of us are some questions. Okay. Is there any questions for us on the water standards report? As could you hand me a napkin? Absolutely. Something really important. Good timing. Okay. Anything else? West, how many days of free river did we end up with? We ended up with around 40, somewhere between 45 and 55 days. It was a whole month and then some. So it's actually, we turned out to be a pretty good run. We had the best basin runoff in the state. So we did pretty well. We filled everything up that we were looking to fill. How did the overall basin end up as far as storage capacity? So in total it was around 90% for our select storage. Those that like think about Budrock, Pleasant Valley, McIntosh Union, some of those that we really have a strong interest in, we're like 98%. And so really good. What were the ones that were lagging? Pleasant Valley. I think we didn't quite fill it. We had some capacity restrictions and we tried to anticipate and run it early. There's another small reason where it fills on the top of that dish. We had to fill as well. But we're, we've got all the water in it. We really feel like we're going to have to have. So we're a good shape. Okay. Great. Thank you. Sorry to just get that. We're on to item seven, which is development activity. It's bad. Who's handling that? I've got that. Okay. Before we start this talk item, and if I can indulge, I'll say for both seven a on the agenda, eight alliance status that I work with for represents the golden entities. I'd like to reduce myself from the conversation in the hearing, but I like to ask the board's indulgence to let me stay in the room over in the corner and listen because we have so few dedication variances that I'd like to learn. So I'm not going to say a word of that. That's okay. Thank you. Appreciate it. So what's in front of the board is the Erwin Thomas final flat. As the board may recall, this was in front of the board back in April. There was a slight revision of the acreage since that time. And so this current plan reflects that change in acreage. So Erwin Thomas final flat is a 48.86 acre parcel located south of Colorado State Highway 119 and west of North Under 19th Street. All the historic water rights were transferred at time of annexation. The full 48.86 acres are subject to the full requirements, the raw water requirement policy. But the total raw water deficit for Erwin Thomas final flat is 48.86 acre feet or one acre foot of water per acre of land. So Erwin Thomas will be compliant to the city's raw water requirement policy on satisfaction of the 48.86 acre foot deficit and time of final flat approval. On the very bottom, you'll notice that the Erwin Thomas final flat includes a 16.82 acre lot and a 9 acre lot identified to be used as part of Walmart's economic development building incentive program and its affordable housing incentive program respectively. And so I'm going to just briefly kind of show those. So Heather, I'm going to ask you just to kind of bounce to the next page. And then we'll, so there's the plat to give you a general location. I think you guys kind of know we're just east of kind of the development with where you have Lowe's and Chick-fil-A and all that. It's undeveloped right now. We'll be east of that little turnout there if you want to go to the next page. So on that top map, this is just, we don't normally, would normally show this, but we wanted to help Water Board to have an understanding of what this is going to look like during this development because even though it's not part of this final plat, pertinent to the development, overall development of the entire property, the entire annexed area, there's going to be some mining and reclamation. And so again, it's not specific, but I wanted to help you guys have an understanding of what that's going to look like. So the plat itself is speaking towards kind of that red part square and then the brown part below. That's kind of the area that is part of this plat. When they mine, there'll be, right now it's looked at, there's going to be about seven different mine pits. A couple on the north side of 119 and the remainder on the south side. And then if you scroll up a little bit ahead, when it's all done, it's anticipated there'll be sort of remaining ponds, if you will, where the other will be reclaimed and there'll be some other development. So this is kind of a concept. It's not set in stone, but that's the way it's going to look as you guys are driving through 119. You'll see for years there'll be the mining application out there and then once it's all done, it'll look something like that. So if you want to go to the next page, Heather. So as the board may recall, back in August of 2018, for those of you that were here, Waterborne Recommended City Council approved up to 400 acre feet of the 1200 acre feet of community development incentives identified in the Longmont Water Demand Evaluation to be required to support Longmont's affordable housing incentive program. So as part of that, the way we're going to track this is fairly simple. It's going to be fairly analytical. We're going to start off with 400 acre feet and as there's lots that are going to be pertinent to Longmont's affordable housing incentive program, we will apply that credit that was earmarked, as I just described. So this is the first time that we've had an application of that credit. So when the plat gets signed, there'll be a credit of 9 acre feet of water that'll be debited from the original 400 acre feet. This is for Longmont's affordable housing. And then it goes grow up to the next one. Similarly, so you started off with 1200, 400 of which went to affordable housing. The remaining 800, as we're showing it right now, is for Longmont's economic development incentive. So what we have here is that lot, which I put in the asterisks of the other report. There's a 16.82 acre lot, one acre-foot deficit for a 16.82 acre-foot deficit. And we're going to subtract that from the 800 acre-foot. So this will just start growing on. Now the one point I would make for Longmont's economic development incentive, I think, I guess I didn't see it actually made it on the next page. Yeah, one on the next page, another all the way down, so you can see the very bottom asking. So one thing I was going to make note of, we've included the policies of pertinent to the raw water affordable housing and the economic development incentive. I don't think it's not relatively complex, but these are the pertinent parts to it. And for economic development, it shows, and you can read it right there, that the businesses that get that incentive would need to show that they're generating annual sales and use tax revenues of at least $2.5 million. So this isn't just willy-nilly give it out to anybody. And this is a, and as it's been expressed, this is for a potential feature cost-o site. And so it's believed to be in Longmont's best interest to incentivize them to build in Longmont, and that's where this credit is going to be applied. But again, if this is added, this, I think, reflects in front of the board, is truly just a normal development activity. There's a one-acre-foot deficit per acre, so a total of 28.86 acre-feet. There's just credit to those two parts, and then the remainder will satisfy Barbara, I'm guessing will be satisfied with cash and loop payments. So, and if there's other questions, I'll try to get where Kim can help answer questions and some things you have possible questions on, maybe also part of our further discussion on the farm supply, whatever you've got. So as we did, there's a 25.82 acre-foot credit, nine acre-feet for affordable housing, 60.28 for economic development, and our remaining 23.04 acre-foot deficit that they'd have to satisfy as it normally would. That's correct. Is there any questions for the Revenue? The Revenue, anticipated Revenue, how are they substantiating that? What's the process? I'll look at it, either Marcia or Jim. I can, I can, I'll probably answer that, and if you need me to, I'll scrape it out and pack it from last spring, if you want to read it and send you a link to it. But there was an extensive economic study done about, you know, two ways. First, comparables, like how much does Sam's Club, how much sales and use tax revenues does it generate? How much economic activity does it turn around and how many, you know, how many people does it employ? And then Costco opened up the Kimono and said, this is the economic performance of comparable stores in similar locations. And actually the economic contribution of the one month's economy is just pretty staggering. So to the extent that the city manager went to great lengths to broker this deal because we could come to terms on their first choice of a site. So it's pretty solid information and if you would send me a note, it'll get me there. Well, is it, would you classify it as a conservative estimate or is that a, I mean... That's, that 2.5 million is very considerable. This is the minimum that's necessary to be in consideration for any development. Yeah. Yeah, I just wondered how, how it came to the number and how it was instantiated. So I guess we're just tracking to see how it goes. Thank you. Alison, did you have a question? Yes, I did. Thank you. I was wondering more about the excavation and then what was going to become of the, what's like four different reservoirs as part of the one-marked water system as those were constructed. Yeah. So the excavation actually predates even the annexation of the property into the city of Loma. Do you mean the mining? The mining. Yeah. This property was going to be mined and vented annexed into the city. So, the annexed and had the mining. So basically it's just going to be mined as any traditional gravel mining operation. On the south side of Kencraft Boulevard they're going to leave a couple of the spent quarries. They're going to, the operator and the landowner are kind of still negotiating that a little bit. The idea is that they'll be slurry-lined and turned into, I guess maybe I could, or probably tell it to say it better, but an aesthetic pond that they'll develop around then. For the north side of 119, the city is currently negotiating with the mine operator and the landowner. Well, we're the landowner north of 119, Kencraft, the golden companies south of 119. We're negotiating to have that as a flow-through wetland, constructed wetland, similar to what, if you've been out to Sandstone Ranch and what we get out there, I think that's really a mock, honestly, for neat reclamation, functional reclamation. So we're hopeful that will happen, but that's just like the next negotiation. And I'll actually, on the water supply agreement, give a lot more detail on that. But yeah, it's basically storage on the south side. Do you have an estimate about how good those are? Potentially. The acreage is on the map. It's like 16, it works like... The top left says 8 acres, and the top right says 7. But we don't know how deep they are. We don't know how deep they are. The resource is about... The resource out there ranges between 15 and 25 feet. But by the time it gets to the bedrock, it's a little different, but when we're looking at mining it, it's a 25 foot deep. Would these be concentrated for a water rate or, I mean, an additional junior water rate? It might not be very useful. It may be an odd plan. We're just starting to have those conversations. I believe they will, just because they'll want to fill them up as they evaporate, because if they slurry line of them, they'll leave the instruments there. There actually is a conversation with the bonus ditch company, which, so why? It's the ditch on the west side of all this property, not a pipe system through... They've reserved that capability to fill those from the local ditch as the bonus ditch. I would suspect... I haven't quite thought that. I know one of them has always been planned to be a storage reservoir, which I presume they would always have. So, is the bonus ditch the historic water that you're going to need to use for those storage reservoirs? Yeah, maybe just changing those for... Do a change of use to be able to put those in the line of storage? Well, that's from the storage. Is there any other question? Go ahead. So, the tally, the two tally sheets, one for economic development, the other for housing, those were originally read upon. It looks like in 2018, there's only one thing on the list. So this isn't like something that's enormously popular, not popular as your own word, but enormously used such that there's some kind of competition for this water that we have to really discuss and parse out in the best way possible. This is really the first one on the list, and it seems like... That's why we're bringing this aspect of it. This is the first time we've applied this part of the policy. And again, it's a fairly high standard to even be in consideration of applying it this way. And when Water Board made their determination in 2018, they set forth that high standard that says if you're going to be able and allow to have this incentive, you're going to have to truly bring something exceptional along. That's what this project is proposing. Maybe the other thing for Tom's benefit. So, I mean, the city's been trying to do kind of a build out what's the build out water demand. And these were put into the water demand, in comparison. So, you know, that's kind of the other element of this, is how much water do we develop and also allocate water to the verbal housing and the economic development. So that's kind of the other place this plays in, is if there were a run on this, I think there'd be a question of you're going to allocate more water to this sort of purpose without them bringing water, then the city's going to have to develop more water supply. So that's the other place I think this plays in to the long term. And supplying the man planning for the city. Sure. So on what other tally sheet or on what other spreadsheet does that 1200 acres, acre foot exist? So in other words, like, is that, you have that in a reservoir somewhere or is that just water that you know you have a little play in the system? 2012, and then it was updated in 2018. You know what we call a future water demand evaluation. So we look at how much water we'll need. Luckily in Longmont, luckily Longmont's pretty well rained by either open space or other developed areas. So we pretty much know what Longmont's going to look like throughout our complete planning horizon. So in our more recent water demand, future water demands, we said, what do we need to build all this area? So in that study, we evaluated a number of factors and one of them was a carve out for the economy. So basically in our water planning, this water is there through other means, but enough to build out. So that's why Water Board felt it was a good idea to track it. Because if we ever get close to the 1200 acre feet, which we don't feel we'll ever get there, we'll never exceed it, but we should track it. So many years down the road, if we do hit that, then we've got to think about it and make decisions. To be real honest, when we did those evaluations, the way we did it was took all the water, all the land that was not had the deficits already met and estimated how much could be used in the economic zone and that was the maximum number. So we don't believe we'll ever exceed it. If our 20 days is perfect, we don't feel we'll ever exceed it, we don't feel we'll ever have to portion it out, but it's certainly something we want to track. Thank you. This is the second approval. It's been a long way in the last few months and that is my question. Down the line, will there be more that we will have to approve on this plan other than this one? Will things change? Probably not in economic development because there's only a few small lots left for commercial type. The rest is residential. There might not be some affordable housing. If this affordable housing program goes through, it goes great. I can't say that there won't be more affordable housing out there. I was talking about this particular piece of property that's working at right now. We had an approval a couple months ago. And again, maybe I was wrong, but one of the primary reasons this is back to the board is because the acreage changed and therefore the required acreage changed. So when it came through in the beginning, it was a smaller flat underground. Because it changed, we wanted to be sure water board seating, the acreage as it stood is going to be asked to be approved by council. So had we not had that change, it may not have even been necessary to come back in front of the board, but we want to be sure that what we're signing off on and the approved flat matches what water boards see. So that's the real reason why we brought it forward. And we thought this would be a great water board's knowledge. And created a context when we talk about this water supply. One question. So this ties to the red and brown and orange on the red ground. And the road. So the lakes you were mentioning, they're going to do a slurry wall around them. Those may be going to keep them high for amenity. So does that mean down the road, they may come in with a plan for the balance of the property to the east. That's a good question. I don't know whether for your private. If they were doing economic development or low cost housing, maybe there would be another request, but that's properties not included in this. I would just looking at the three college property. We had talked about not I didn't realize. Okay. Anything else? So do you need a recommendation so we need a motion by the water board to recommend the council approve the water requirement as described in the memo. I'll move. There's a motion. Is there a second? A second. An analysis in seconds. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Okay. Here we go. So we do not have anything under we're under nothing for seven B's. Now we're under a day which is the water Erwin Thomas water supply agreement. Yes. I have two water supply agreements before you today. For the most part there are fairly standard water supply agreements that you normally see there are a couple things about the history of the I need to slightly different so I wanted to highlight that. The second thing is I would like to hand out I'll hand out potential change in the second of the agreements. I'll explain that when I get to the second agreement. Just to kind of give you a little bit of the history the property that we were just looking at so so this property north of is owned by the city open space in the properties south it's still owned by if you go back in history a little bit all of that property was going to be mine at one time and the golden companies sold the property north of to the county who then sold the property to Longmont so now we own that we call it golden farms both and then north of the creek there's another smaller part so you can't really see it there but actually if you go into this one it's exhibit A to both agreements there you go so property in green is what the city came from the county and there's also one small parcel north of the railroad tracks that also is contemplated for mining and one time the entire was contemplated for mining so when we Longmont purchased that property from the county the mining was already set was already permitted through the county and ready to go so as a result the mining company had always planned on utilizing the historical water on the property for the mining operations when we acquired the property in green we the city acquired two shares of the bonus stitch company which in that agreement it was agreed that that water would be able to be used for the mining operation even though it was included in the overall so so when it's all done and over you will still own the water once the mining is done and then south of Kenprout Boulevard while originally that the bonus water in the south of the creek of Kenprout was planned to be used for the mining operation but then when the annex of course you have to dedicate all the historical water to the city and then consistent with our long standing policy in Longmont we do lease the historical water back to the landowner until the time that it develops so there's really two parts to the overall mining operation the first part is a short term water supply basically they need a water supply while they're mining both any stream depletions that occur during the time of mining but also for mining operations dust control those kind of things we certainly wanted to keep the dust down out there right beside our community but also when they take the product out and call the sand and gravel out it necessarily takes water out from that sand and gravel it doesn't sound like a lot but when you haul many many truckloads every day that's all the water so between all of that there is a water demand during the time of mining so the two mining agreements you'll see one mining agreement will say exactly what it says don't worry about any water supply and it's a short term agreement only lasting for the extent of mining and then the second water supply agreement is a longer term it's proposed to be a 20 year agreement and it will be for what's called the reclamation what's it done mining after a claimed area and a significant impact on the stream has to be the water has to be replaced to the stream we don't believe there's a lot there's going to be a lot of water so but this agreement the second agreement the reclamation agreement is the maximum amount of water so the agreement is up to that amount they're currently the golden companies are negotiating with the mining company and they want to they're going to they're pretty sure they're going to slurry wall the pit staff in there we still have to sit down the city and the golden companies and the mining company to determine whether I don't know that there will be a slurry lining if we end up doing it as a reclaimed one but that's yet to be determined but there's sufficient water even in the current at any rate all the water has to be done by the golden or the mining company through the process of mining and reclamation after we sent out on the second agreement after we sent out the copy to water board in the recitals it really doesn't not a real big deal on sub paragraph half of the second agreement of reclamation there is a provision there that basically describes there's a mining lease between the two companies the mining company and the golden which we're not a part of do and we'll let that stand as is both those parties wanted the reference in the water supply agreement to their buying up to their mining lease in that mining lease they had this first language in paragraph half that says less or golden companies would supply all water owned by golden companies for the mining company's operation during the mining lease provided that these operations are conducted in accordance with the reclamation plan so the language I haven't read after we sent it out the mining company said we want that language in there it had been left in it was kind of a later addition to the agreement it was not left in because it doesn't affect the city but one of the two parties doesn't want it in there so we still have to negotiate that I wanted to highlight that so we'll ask the water board to approve these two agreements I don't believe the form before you and I don't believe whether the language is in there or out of there A it's in the recitals so it's not part of the agreement part of it and B it doesn't change the context of the agreement at all or any water we would provide or affect that anyway so I believe it's not a substitute to change whether it's in there or not but I just wanted to highlight it we'll have you prove it I made that one change I wanted to let you know So does the reclamation plan currently show those as line reservoirs? It shows them as reservoirs I think there's still a discussion I believe it says I believe it's reservoirs lined by slurry walls I guess as long as it says lined my concern would be if it does not show a lined reservoir because they got a bond for that in my mind it would be a little bit extra sure of you the city that you don't have a you've got a temporary lease and you've got a 20-year lease if they don't line these you have a perpetual obligation I guess long when it would only be obligated up to 20 years I guess in my mind and I don't know far maybe does the reclamation plan show it as a lined reservoir then it would be in accordance with that there's temporary water demand versus more of a perpetual obligation as my only concern Go ahead morning Under the mining plan they have bonded to the slurry wall So it is bonded South of the realm is bonded to the slurry wall How we line those cons and how we work with the city regarding their long-term depletions is still in pass And I'm not worried about the rest of the board is beginning to put on stuff on that the city owns I'm more worried about the randomly owned that if we have an agreement with somebody on the reclamation plan and they're bonding and everything fits together with what the agreement say that's binding this around So per the standard requirements we bond for a slurry wall until and unless an augmentation plan is approved has been Right So they'll have a temporary structure to pipeline Correct The plan is to line the cons Right How we do it? I just want to know that they've got the bonding that they have that cost and they have that obligation such that they're sure in the city they will open the line in one shape or form So we don't have a prison ongoing obligation that the city would somehow do Because we've been pretty clear in our negotiations with them that we have a historical lease back where the water until we go through our court until Kalaan develops until we need it we can lease it back when we come real clear this water south of 119 is never going to be part of a permanent augmentation plan because you're going to build development out there and we need to put it in the tab And I just want to make sure that the reclamation plan kind of follows that if somebody goes The reclamation shows now one life bond however the permit is bonded for a slurry wall around the entire property So until when our boats are lying and there's an augmentation plan in place the bond stays in place for the slurry wall for the PRMS and the stand here I'm going to sink about that Are there other questions?  Yeah, they'll have to get a temporary substitute supply plan for the term of the mine so that'll be the first of the five-year agreement They'll have to get a temporary substitute supply plan and that will be a separate process And then if they don't Well they'll have to do a permanent augmentation plan afterwards that's the long term agreement and assuming that they get a slurry line and assuming the state accepts that wants the state accepts that So the temporary substitute supply plan is like before the state engineer the permanent one is But they wouldn't have a permanent augmentation plan if they line If they line it and it's accepted Right, I mean there'd be maybe some depletions that go once the lining there may be certain things that would be longer but I don't think they need a permanent augmentation on that if they line talking about the land to the side They should if it's truly accepted by the state the obligation would be if they want to change water and put it into storage and that sort of thing which I don't know if that would be the bonus ditch that they have or how that would work in terms of what water they would use for a junior primary Anyway, but I think that's how it would be I don't think they'd have to change the bonus to shares for the augmentation Well, they've already dedicated the bonus to shares to the city and we're in the process So we would supply them to the water Yeah, we would supply them water for a 20-year period if it's needed We're hoping that it's not needed But I think the bonus ditch has been dedicated to the city. It'll ultimately be used for the potable supply for the property around the lakes The lakes are lined so they don't need permanent augmentation They could file for a junior storage right to try to fill them with that way But that's absent the lowest ditch Namely, that's been dedicated to the city that's going to be used for potable water There'd have to be other water used to fill them or a junior procreation would be how the water would work in terms of the water Yeah, which is probably what they would use We would use the Reclamation Agreement to fill them more than likely Unless they fill them during the free river But that's only a 20-year period There's not a perpetual one So the city's obligation would only be dedicated, right? So there's no perpetual obligation for the city to the ponds to the water We've been real clear about that So Chalk this up as a newbie question I suppose I mean, the liner covers groundwater losses or is negation external losses So what we're talking about here is for example, that would be the city's obligation to refill after that 20-year period No If they don't file for a a new junior storage right or they don't go somewhere else and release some water from the park then their ponds will basically eventually dry up They're going to want to keep involved for aesthetic reasons because they have development around it So I'm pretty sure they'll eventually go file a junior or a right And then what they do is they just basically fill them and there's surplus and then they can agree Whatever there's a very junior call Or they can lease water other places Are there further questions? So we need a recommendation by the water board and I guess we'll do it in two pieces One for the short term and one for the That'd be great, yeah Just wait I don't mind making sure it's substantial in the form because there's always a tweak here If anything changes significantly of any significance then we'll have to come back to the water board Okay Any further discussion? Otherwise we need emotion and we'll do it We'll do eight The temporary We'll What we're calling the temporary mining water supply agreement first So we need a motion to recommend that for approval Let's see We've got a motion Is there a second? Okay, we have a motion to second Further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor say aye Opposed? Okay So now we're on to the second agreement which is water supply agreement So this is the 20 year agreement, is that right? Yes Once again we need a motion to recommend approval of the water supply agreement for the Urban Thomas Reclamation to the city council We have a motion, is there a second? Second Motion to second Further discussion? Hearing none, all those Just one more question So is it typical to not have, for example a little bit more certainty with respect to kind of like that Of course, I understand that we're working from the city's perspective Right, and so and of course there'll be this pond out there that potentially that will probably be filled probably be filled because the developer wants it to be aesthetically, you know of course the city probably has kind of what to say in that in a way other than just telling our community nice and pleasant to live in and not have a big line pond that's empty I suppose in the middle of it Do we Is it typical to have that type of uncertainty at this point in the process, I suppose Or is it from your experience then, for example in other types of scenarios that you've been in, has this been kind of where people are at in the process, where we're at right now? Actually this is the first ever mining we've ever had Yeah, it's We've never had a gravel mine in a long level before This seems very strange to me I mean I know that we have historic mining within our community and eventually those things get kind of annexed into the community etc and we have all these gravel ponds around us, etc I'm just curious, and this is of course the first one where it's going to be an active I think cooperation within the city limits just a bit more special consideration with respect to their reclamation plan like a little bit more certainty with respect to their reclamation plan, given that it's within the city limits at this moment right, and it's not just something that will potentially annex later because it's outside of our curfew Now no, it's a little bit that way there is some certainty in that if it were mind and reclaimed pursuits we would have a reclamation plan so if it were mind so a little bit of that uncertainty is because of what Longmont is doing by asking for the reclamation to be changed North of Kimpratt South of Kimpratt honestly the entire area was going to be mine while the entire north decided because the area through here was always going to be mined all the way over and then when Costco came in that shifted that took that mining out which kind of put the whole reclamation plan a little bit in limbo and so a little bit was because we're balancing the great community interested in having economic development and affordable housing so that's what kind of so that made it hard for the mining operator who now has a much smaller area of mine and still has to put this big slurry wall in so that's why the negotiations were a little bit so that's why it's a little bit different in this one because of what and why we do have to change the mining reclamation plan a little bit because we are performing but yeah I would say I don't know if we'll ever have much more mining in the city but it's a little those things we're trying to juggle multiple competing interests here Tom brings up a good point though you're going to have two lakes right on highway 118 then if I understand this right they don't have the permanent water supply other than maybe a junior filing such that if those go in at some point from aesthetic perspective long months not obligated to provide the water long term so they've got to figure it out at some point I think Tom brings up a good point that development occurs all the way around the property does that somebody come back to the city down the road at some point say we need permanent that isn't what these agreements say that's just I guess a concern in the long term and I think it's a good point they are incentivized in other ways to keep those the only concern is they've got a 20 year agreement with the city where they could fill them so the issue would be okay we have this 20 year agreement we're going to keep them full and then is the developer gone at that point and now what do you do with these bonds down the road in terms of keeping them full the actual in the agreement there's a condition the developer is turning it forward to the HOA pretty quickly and the HOA is going to be set up eyes wide open to take care of that organization well I just get nervous with the HOA does get it and they don't have a good permanent water supply and you want to keep levels full somebody could be an issue so I think Tom's right to bring that that's a good point it goes through the process and development plans come for that parcel I think that's something that needs to be very explicit the developer and HOA if you just have a junior right there may be long periods where you're not in and if you're viewing those as aesthetic bonds it may not turn out that way I mean so that's a good point in the sense that there's another bite at this apple I suppose when that area around it gets developed so like this isn't the and don't necessarily with respect to making sure that the bonds they build and that at some point when that industry can get developed that maybe it deserves more scrutiny in that right I think that's a real one is there any other questions on this paragraph 5 of the second agreement indicates that it looks like you need a lot of extension of 20 year term there there is an extension so would they be obligated if one not wanted to continue in the supply would they be obligated to continue to pay for that they would be obligated to take it it would just give them an opportunity to enjoy an opportunity to take it any other comments? really up to the city whether it would be extended or not the city is not being able to control whether so one more I guess just one question on process when they come through, so we're dealing with right now we got Costco and multi-family there's going to be a subsequent raw water dedication whatever they plow so to Tom's point when that plows that's going to be coming back to the Water Board too and that would be another point where bringing that issue up it's not necessarily a potable water requirement per se but I think it is so just making sure everybody's on the same page if there's a water application there especially if the UN isn't at the static lake they don't have a permanent water supply currently there alright so go ahead and spot us I mean you got the recognition do you have emotion okay alright so emotion in a second and that was the further discussion any further discussion all those in favor say aye aye great so welcome back Scott thank you so we're on to item 9 we didn't have any items on the staff items from board review of major project listings and items kind of established for future board meetings I guess one item is Kathy was the vice chair of the water board so I don't know at some point we're going to need to establish a new vice chair so it's obvious to be re-elect anything else from the board considerations okay item 11 is informational items and water board correspondence can I think you'd have an item or two attached that I'm going to speak to those um they're just copies of emails we're trying to re-transfer some of them and we're on to 12 days cash in the blue review that'll occur next in September and now we're on to item 13 which is an executive session to discuss security protocols for one most water system so based on that we're going to need to close the meeting and I don't know at the executive session we have to read some protocol and step in just this right there we have previous records generally one of the board would make a motion to go into executive session under documentation under the I'm not the attorney for the board so I'm not going to make that my recommendation I think we're going to generally do it just fine well I would think that's our question I think she's part of the board yeah so you see some of it one way or the other here's your hat which you're going to receive thank you for my taste I think another question we're going to have I don't know about recording camera can stay on until we make the motion okay well sometimes I have whether or not it's recorded or not is that the recommendation okay alright so do you want to do we have something to read in in terms of prior to the recommendation based on what statute that's my experience of executive session yeah step the last water board to convene in an executive session to discuss matters to study specialized details of security protocols along with water system primarily focused both on cyber security and what does this stop doing we're doing it's not in an executive session because all water system security are thoroughly controlled on disclosure so we need a motion by the board to go into executive session so there's a motion is there a second motion a second any further discussion hearing none all those in favor say hi hi so we'll go ahead and take a break while you you want to turn the recording to white


There's just so many gifts, the fruits of the Spirit, there's so many gifts that want to pour through us and whatever abilities that we've had and whatever those skills and abilities are, they can be given over to the Holy Spirit to awaken us to our true reality. Whatever the ego made can be used. So it takes us out of this mindset of trying to look at the world and say these are the good things and the bad things because we really don't know if everything that the ego made can be used to unwind us from the belief in linear time, then we could say that time itself, which is a projection of the ego, has only one purpose and that's to be undone. So everything is just for the undoing of linear perception and the ego. It came up earlier the question about death and we tend to think as death is something as a biological event on the timeline but actually the ego itself is the death wish, the ego's dark filter and so all we really have to do is have that exposed where we would hide nothing from Jesus, hide nothing from the Holy Spirit and then we live our vibrancy that for instance mentioned that is our life, that is a living expression of forgiveness and I would say if you're pondering this choice of giving up all compromise and what I mean by that is is letting go of all self-concepts of the world, all things that have been learned to be willing to unlearn everything and be empty is the Buddha taught and as Jesus teaches certainly in lesson 189 of the course where he says you know to come with holy empty hands unto your God and forget this world forget this course you know he's nothing is sacred the words aren't sacred the course isn't sacred nothing is sacred come with empty hands unto your God you know that's when I first read that passage I just felt my heart chords just resonating so deep right before I started to read that paragraph I felt the heart chords strumming very strong and I felt this presence saying pay attention there's your shortcut if you want to really zoom into the presence of God just go go go with this go into this allow yourself to go into this


You didn't put on deodorant this morning, did you?  Yeah, I love something. Oh, goodness, boy. Welcome to Hang Time. The rules are simple. The interview lasts as long as you can hang. This is B-Dot coming to you from the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. So let's go. This horn sounds... It's time to hang. Today, I'm hanging with one of the NBA's Best Sharp Shooters.  It's none other than Chandler Parsons. Yeah, he can ball, but can he hang? Hey, yo, B-Dot. You think you can hang with me? Chandler, you're way too tall and gangly for this. I know you're gonna fall quick. This kid thinks he has a chance with me. I've had meals bigger than him. You get to it? You ready to lose? Yeah, let's go. That's it, man. Not gonna hurt being so short when you fall that far? I haven't fallen that off. I'm actually still hanging right now. It's the first time for everything. You ready? You sure about this? Got your markers right there? This thing's a little slippery. You already got the gloves on, too. You're already on advantage. It sounded like a personal problem. Three, two, one. Hang down. All right, man. Are hugs awkward when you're 16? Yeah, you know, it depends. It's a five-one, five-foot female. It could get a little awkward. Oh, if you were, if you were to play football, what position would you play? A quarterback or a tight end. You got a good arm? I got a little bit of a cannon on me. A little bit. All right, um, can you do an accent? An accent. Yeah, like a, you know, like a good day mate. Oh, that was terrible, but oh, bonjour. Nope.  It's French, bro. French. Okay. That was terrible. But, um, how you holding up, man? You good? I'm struggling a little bit. A little bit. And a scale of one to Prince's voice. Mm-hmm. How good does it feel to have your own underwear line? It was weird at first. I started off by doing socks, and then I went to underwear. Strange articles of clothing to be endorsed by, but it's pretty cool. I got to get you some. You can start your own cartoon series. What would the name be? Uh, Channie, baby. Oh, I like that. You would tune in? I would definitely tune in. Favorite all-time Disney princess. Favorite got to be Cinderella. Cinderella. Yeah, she's a baddie. Cinderella was kind of hot. Uh, I'm struggling. Struggling, I can tell. Pretty good.  It doesn't look like it. Nah, it don't. I think you're going down to the intimidation factor. Yeah? A random question. Do you believe in Bigfoot? Bigfoot. No. You do? Scene check? Yeah. Yeah. Damn, I'm slipping. Come on, man. I see, I see why you single now, Chandler. You sure, man? I got a little one hand. I'm just going to chill a little bit. Don't show off. It's much harder than it looks. Yeah, yeah. It's okay. Maybe next time. Your forearm's burning? Bro, I'm fine. More of a leg guy. Yeah. Bottom half. Yeah, so, okay, next one. Next season, my leg. We'll hang from our feet. That's perfect. Might win that, too.


Hi and welcome to the session I am Deepika Hing. Let's discuss the question, find the intervals in which the function left given by fx is equal to 2x cube minus 3x square minus 36x plus 7 is a strictly increasing b strictly decreasing. Let us first understand the definition of strictly increasing function and strictly decreasing function. A function is strictly increasing or decreasing on an open interval where its derivative is positive or negative. That is a function is strictly increasing on an open interval where its derivative is positive and a function is strictly decreasing on an open interval where its derivative is negative. So this is a key idea behind our question. Let's start the solution given is equal to 2x cube minus 3x square minus 36x plus 7 therefore f dash x is equal to 6x square minus 6x minus 36 and this is equal to 6 we will take common x square minus x minus 6 and this is again equal to 6x square minus 3x plus 2x minus 6 and this is equal to 6x into x minus 3 plus 2 into x minus 3 that is this is equal to 6x plus 2 and x minus 3. Now f dash x is equal to 0 implies x is equal to minus 2 or 3. Now the points x is equal to minus 2 and 3 divides the real line into three disjoint intervals minus infinity to minus 2 minus 2 to 3 and 3 to infinity. Now consider when x is less than minus 2 or x plus 2 and x minus 3 both will be negative x plus 2 and x minus 3 both are negative therefore f dash x is equal to 6 into x plus 2 into x minus 3 and this will be positive therefore f dash x is increasing in the interval minus infinity to 2. Now consider the interval when minus 2 is less than x x is less than 3 then plus 2 is positive and x minus 3 will be negative therefore f dash x is equal to 6 into x plus 2 into x minus 3 is negative this implies f dash x is less than 0 and this implies f is strictly decreasing in the open interval minus 2 to 3. This is greater than 3 x minus 3 and x plus 2 both are positive therefore f dash x is equal to which is 6 into x plus 2 into x minus 3 is positive this implies f dash x is greater than 0 hence f is strictly increasing in the open interval 3 to infinity hence the answer for part a that is the given function fx is strictly increasing in the interval minus infinity to minus 2 and 3 to infinity. So this is the answer for part a f is strictly decreasing in an open interval minus 2 to 3 and this is the answer for part b I hope the question is clear to you bye and take care