This lecture is part of an online course on commutative algebra, and we will be discussing the geometry of the set of associated primes of a module M. So I'll just start with a quick review of the background. So first of all, M is going to be a finitely generated module over a notarian ring for the whole of this lecture. Then we just recall that the set of associated primes of M is the set of primes P such that our modulo P is isomorphic to a subset of M, which will sloppily denote like this. And we recall this set as finite. And we were looking at the problem of decomposing M into a series of modules like this with each quotient M i plus one over M i isomorphic to something of the form of modulo of prime. And what we showed is that if P is in the associated prime of M, then R over P has to occur in every chain like this. There's a sort of converse to this one can ask about. Suppose we've got a module, can we find a chain like this such that every quotient is of the form R over P for P in associated prime? And the answer is no. In fact, we had an example of this last lecture. You remember if we take M to be the module or ideal X, Y in the ring R, which was polynomials in two variables, then we saw the set of associated primes of M. It's just zero. On the other hand, as we saw last lecture, we can't really find a sequence like this such that all the quotients are isomorphic to R. So the exact relation between the set of associated primes of M and the quotients in the sequences like this is a little bit messier than in the case of modules of finite lengths. In fact, counter examples of this are quite common. If M is a torsion-free module over an integral domain R, then again, the set of associated primes of M is equal to zero, just the zero prime. And torsion-free modules are fairly common. Over principle ideal domains, they're just, they have a very simple structure, but in general, they're a bit messy. For example, even if you take R to be, well, another standard counter example to everything is the ring generated by the square root of minus five. So this is the standard example of a dedicated domain that is not a unique factorization domain. And in particular, it's got plenty of non-principle ideals. For instance, you can take M to be the non-principle ideal generated by two and one plus root minus five. And then again, M, the associated primes of M is just zero, but you can't build up M by taking extensions of R. M is just non-principle and this just doesn't work. So what we want to discuss for most of this lecture is the geometry of the set of associated primes of M. So let's just recall that the spectrum of R is the set of prime ideals. And we want to relate the associated primes of M to the spectrum. So the set of associated primes is in fact a subset of the spectrum of R. As well as the set of associated primes, we're also going to talk about the support of a module, which is denoted by the support of M. And it's just the set of primes of P with M, P, none empty. So you can think of this as being the stalk of M at the point P of the spectrum. So this is just a module over the localization of P. And it's easier to check the support of M. It's just the set of primes containing the annihilator of M which is the set of elements of the ring that just kill M. So let's just look at a few examples. First of all, let's take, let's start with R as the simplest case. And here, let's start by taking M equals Z over 12 Z, say. This isn't very difficult. If we draw the spectrum of R, we've got the ideal zero, which is this one-dimensional generic point. And we've got the point two, three, five and so on. And it's pretty obvious that both the support of M and the associated set of associate primes of M just consist of these two points here. So we have a sort of M equals support of M equals two, three. So for modules of finite length, there's not a lot of difference between them. So let's have a slightly more complicated example. Let's take M to be Z, module Z itself. And now if we draw the spectrum, we find the support of M is just the whole of the spectrum of Z. So everything is in the support. Let's draw the support like this. On the other hand, the set of associated primes is much smaller. So the set of associated primes of M is just zero. So here, the set of associated primes is just this generic point, but doesn't include these closed points here. So the support of M is much bigger than the set of associated primes. And if you look at a third example, suppose you take M equals Z plus Z over two Z. Here again, the support of M is obviously just the whole of the spectrum of Z. So if we draw the spectrum of Z like this, the support of M is going to consist of everything here, and it's also going to consist of all these points here. On the other hand, the set of associated primes of M consists of zero and the prime two. So we've got zero, which looks like this, but we've also got this extra point here. So what you can see from this is the set of associated primes is sort of giving you more information than the support of M. Here, the support of M is a very crude and variant that once your module contains M, the support is already everything and no matter what else you add to M, the support can't detect that. However, the set of associated primes can sort of notice that M has a little bit extra apart from Z here. If you look at this, you notice the support of M always seems to be the closure of the set of associated primes. And in fact, this is true in general. So let's just check this. So this is for, as usual, for finitely generated modules over notarian rings. The support of M is just the closure of the finite set of associated primes of M. And this is easy to show. First of all, if P is an associated prime of M, then P is equal to the annihilator of A, some A in M, it's a prime ideal. And this implies P contains the annihilator of the whole of M, which implies P is in the support of M. So the associated primes of M is contained in the support of M and since the support of M is closed, it must be, this is contained in that. On the other hand, if P is in the support of M, then this implies by definition of MP, the localization is none zero. And now what we do is we look at at the set of associated primes of MP, which is not empty because MP is none zero. So let's pick some prime Q in the set of associated primes of MP. So Q is an element of the spectrum of localization of R at P. And then you can check the, we've got a map from R to RP. So this gives us a map from the spectrum of RP to the spectrum of R. So if this map is F, this map is sort of taking the inverse of a prime. And if we look at the inverse of Q, we see that this is an associated prime of M contained in P. So P is in the closure of this prime. So anything in the support of M is in the closure of some associated prime of M. So let's have a look at another example. Let's take R to be the ring of polynomials and two variables. And then you remember the spectrum sort of looks like a two-dimensional plane. So it's got some closed points, which correspond to the points of the plane. And it's also got some one-dimensional points which correspond to primes generated by irreducible polynomials. And finally, it's got some sort of huge generic two-dimensional points corresponding to the ideal zero. And it doesn't matter if you can't read this very faint yellow because I don't really need it, but I'm drawing it very faint to avoid distracting you too much. And then if we take M to be, say, the ideal KXY, so not the ideal D, the module KXY over Y, then the support, sorry, the set of associated primes is just the ideal Y. So you can think of the support as just being this... Sorry, the set of associated primes is just going to be the X-axis where Y is equal to zero. And the support, of course, would be the closure of this. So you should then add on all the points on this, but I don't really want to worry about the support too much. And what you can do is you can think of this module as being somehow living on its support. So the module sort of sits here and is zero outside the support. Now let's look at a slight modification of this. This time I'm going to take the module to be KXY, modulo the ideal generated by Y squared and XY. And if we draw this, then the support is again going to be the support this time is just the same as before. So this is just the support. Support is actually going to be the closure of this, but the set of associated primes contains not just the support, but also the ideal zero zero. So here the associated primes of M is Y and the ideal XY. So you can see if you write down a basis for M, you can see it consists of the M that's one X, X squared and so on together with the element Y. And this ideal is the annihilator of the element Y and this ideal here is the annihilator of the element X. Now, what's going on here is this is an example of something called an embedded prime. So let's note to that. So this is called an embedded prime and this is called an isolated or minimal prime of M. So we're going to divide the associated primes and the two sorts of primes, embedded ones and minimal ones. And the minimal ones are the minimal elements of the set of associated primes and the embedded ones are the ones that aren't minimal. So here you can see that this prime is contained in that one, so this one is embedded. And if you're wondering about the terminology for being embedded, it's pretty obvious from this diagram because you can see that this prime is kind of, it's in the closure of this prime here. So this is the prime Y and this is the prime X, Y and you can think of it as being sort of embedded in it if you view it geometrically. And what happens is the most problems about modules are caused by embedded primes. If a module doesn't have embedded primes, it's a lot easier to deal with. In fact, if we go back to the previous example, you can see we actually had some example of embedded primes and minimal primes. For instance, you can see that this is an embedded prime and this is a minimal prime. And again, it's sort of the embedded prime is sort of contained in the minimal prime. And here there are no embedded primes and here there are no embedded primes. So what we want to do now is, well, we sort of shown that a module M can be visualized as a, it can be rather weakly visualized as a subset of the spectrum of R. So you can think of the module in this case as sort of, it's sort of sitting on this point here, but then there's more of it sitting at this point here because there's sort of more of it coming from the embedded prime in some sense. However, this is, although the set of associated primes of a module is more refined than the support, it's still a very crude invariant. For example, if you take this module and you take two copies, some of two copies of this module, it's still going to have exactly the same set of associated primes. So what we want to do is to find a more refined way of looking at the module. And this is going to be something called the co-primary decomposition of a module, as usual finitely generated over a notarian ring. And the idea is to kind of break up M into modules, each associated to one element of the set of associated primes of M. So back in this case here, we somehow want to break up this module here into a module associated with this element of the set of associated primes and a module associated with this element. So let's just see what happens over Z. Well, if we've got a finitely generated Abelian group, then by the structure theorem of finitely generated Abelian groups, we can write A as A naught plus A two plus A three. And so on, where this is going to be free Abelian, Z to the N, this is going to be a two group. This is going to be a three group and so on. And here the set of associated primes of Z to the N is just zero, assuming it's non-empty. And here the set of associated primes is going to be two if it's non-empty. And here the set of associated primes is just going to be three. So we can write any Abelian finitely generated Abelian group as a product of Abelian groups, each of which is associated with just one prime in the set of associated primes of A. And before we go on, we should notice that these groups here are unique. So A two and A three just has to be the set of elements of order of power of two and so on. However, Z to the N is not unique as a sub-module of A. I mean, it's unique up to isomorphism, but what I mean is that there's not a unique sub-module of A corresponding to that. For instance, if you take A to be Z plus Z over two Z, you could take the element Z to be generated by one zero or you could take a different element Z to be generated by one one. So this decomposition is, well, some bits of it are unique and other bits of it aren't unique. And we will see that this non-uniqueness tends to be caused by embedded primes, which as I said, cause all problems. So the next question is, can we do this for finitely generated modules M? So can we write M to be a sum of modules M i where each M i has exactly one associated prime. So we can do this for a billion groups. And the answer is for general rings, no, we can't. And we've seen an example of this before. It's the one we had earlier where you take M to be the module R, modulo Y squared X, Y. And if we draw, if we write down a basis for M, we can write a basis as one X, X squared, X cubed and Y. And now we have the associated primes of M. So one associated prime was R modulo Y. And we can take the sum of this with the module R over X, Y. And we have a map from this module to the sum of these. Well, this is a basis one X, X squared and so on. And this has a basis just of the point one, so that should be a Y squared, point one and Y. And you see this isn't actually an isomorphism. This module doesn't map onto these two. The best we can do is to say that M is a sub module of sum of modules M i. So this will be the co-primary decomposition of a module M. The reason for this, it being called this, is that these are co-primary modules, which we'll define later. For finitely generated modules over no two in rings, a co-primary module is one that has exactly one associated prime, although for general modules there's actually a slight difference between them. So you can see that this isn't really quite a decomposition of M because it's only a sub module of this, but it still gives a more refined picture of M. So each of these modules is going to be associated to one of the associated primes of M. So here this is a sort of sum over associated primes of M. So this is about as close as we can get to the usual structure theorem for finitely generation of billion groups for modules over a notarian ring. So historically, people didn't think of this as a theorem about modules. They thought of it as being a theorem about ideals. And for ideals, what we get is essentially the famous Laska-Nurter theorem. What this says is that if I is an ideal of R, where R is notarian, then I is the intersection of primary ideals where this is a finite intersection. So what's a primary ideal? Well, a primary ideal J is an ideal such that if X, Y is in J, then X is in J or Y to the N is in J for some N greater than or equal to one. So this does like the definition of a prime ideal except we allow some power of Y here. So this rather weird looking definition was actually invented by Laska. So another way of putting this is that if we take the ring R modulo J and it says that every zero divisor is nilpotent, whereas in a prime ideal every zero divisor would be zero. So for example, if we take the ring of integer Z, the prime ideals are zero and P for P prime in the usual sense, whereas the primary ideals are just the ideal zero and the ideals generated by powers of a prime. You might think from this that primary ideals are just powers of prime ideals. Well, they're sort of related to powers of prime ideals but they turn out not to be the same for more complicated ideals. I just finished by saying a little bit about Laska who was one of the more interesting mathematicians. He was actually at one point, the world chess champion. So here's a picture of him and here's his book on chess. In fact, he's in some sense the most successful world champion of all. He held the world chess championship for longer than anybody else has ever held it. And in fact, he proved the Laska-Nurter theorem while he was world chess champion. He sort of took time off to do a PhD in mathematics. So this is definitely the best mathematics theorem ever proved by a world chess champion. And I guess he's also the best world chess champion who was ever a mathematician. He also did various other things. He attempted to write books on philosophy. In fact, if you're interested in seeing his books on philosophy, he mentions them here, comprehension of the world and the philosophy of the unattainable. These were apparently completely ignored by 20th century philosophers although given what 20th century philosophers are like that probably doesn't mean very much. I have an interesting challenge question. Can you think of an idea produced by 20th century philosopher that is both comprehensible and true and not obvious? Anyway, Laska also wrote a play which has been lost without trace and he tried breeding pigeons and this was completely unsuccessful and he tried various other things as well. So he did quite a lot of things apart from the Laska-Nerta theorem. Nerta is of course the famous Emmy Nerta. Laska originally proved the Laska-Nerta theorem for polynomial rings over either fields or the integers and his proof was nightmarishly complicated. His original paper on this was 100 pages long and it was one of the longest papers ever written in mathematics. We're not going to prove Laska's version of it. We're going to prove Nerta's version of it. So Nerta proved a stronger theorem because she proved it for all Nertaian rings and her proof is just a couple of paragraphs long. It sort of condensed this 100 pages into just a very short almost trivial result. So anyway, next lecture we're going to explain what a co-primary module is and what it has to do with a primary ideal.


What's up everybody? Welcome to the front yard fantasy hour presented by FanDuel. I'm your host, Simon joined as always by my beautiful co-host, Josh and John Luke. What's up guys? What up? Beautiful. We're feeling good Friday. Joining us for the yard fantasy hour to play some fantasy fortune is a great friend of the show and very special guest. We have Jeff Bell with us today. For those of you that do not know Jeff, he is the dynasty lead over at football guys. And then he hosts the Debbie Roy out podcast and coming off the edge. Jeff, thank you so much for joining us today. My man. Hey, thank you for having me.  This is fantastic. The growth that I've seen from you guys, you guys welcomed me into the space with open arms. JL was one of the very first people that I talked to and he gave me some real guidance and you guys have been friends along the way and I'm happy to be here and I'm really proud of everything that you've built and accomplished. Damn, Jeff. I'm just going to make me teary eyed in red face for the rest of the show. But Jeff truly the relationship we formed with you has been one of the most impactful in this space and I just love streaming with you, man. I'm glad that you're on here today and we're going to get to play some games and I get to play today. I'm glad I get to play against you. Josh is hosting. We're playing at least one. We got some people in the chat ready for today's show as well. Dinesh. Hi. Welcome in. Glad to have you here and Craig. Craig said that Jeff can translate this for us. Jeff, can you translate this? What is Craig saying? I believe that while I was trying to count if there were four bells for Whom J Baltolls and it does look like there are some but I can't count to four I think. I think Craig might have miscounting there. Maybe if that's what we're doing. So Craig, I think maybe you need to brush up on your bell talk like maybe you think you're more proficient than you actually are. Maybe you might have been better in high school. He was calling you proficient in bell on his resume, but he only took two years. Obviously he's calling Jeff a ding dong. Five. Oh, I can words Craig. Obviously. Mr. Scamper's welcome and he said, ever noticed the slight but important distinction between let's go and let us go. Let us go. I've never thought of that, but that is very different. Even though it's technically the same words there and Dame said, let us effing go. Yeah, it is time for the show today, Dame. We got Daddy Fanduel in here. What's up? It is show time. W's all around and Joey said I paused House of Gucci to come join in on the fun and Jeff, you got tears in the chat too with that with that at the beginning. Kev, welcome and bird up. Glad to have you here. Guys, before we get started, a couple reminders. Number one, fandals on top of it there ahead of it. Make sure you are following our guest Jeff on Twitter. If you are not doing so already, you can find him on Twitter at for whom J bell toll is the link is in the chat and it's right there below his handsome face on screen or I guess it's below the handsome football guys face on screen. So make sure you go follow him over there on Twitter. After you do that, if you're watching this, that means you are already on the fan dual YouTube or Twitch channels. You're on twitch at that follow button. If you're on YouTube, make sure you subscribe to fan dual on YouTube. Then after you do that, if you're enjoying this content, go follow fan dual on Instagram, TikTok, Twitter. They're at fan dual on all platforms there as well. They have a whole team of killer content creators almost as handsome and charming as us helping you guys win your leagues and win some money. So make sure you guys follow fan dual across all platforms and then if you are not sick of our faces yet, if you enjoy the games that we play over here, we do this every day, Monday through Friday at 3 p.m. Eastern time over on our YouTube channel at front yard fantasy. So go subscribe over there and every day, late lunch break, maybe it's the end of the work day where you just have to like pretend to do stuff for another hour and a half before you can go home. We are the perfect thing to play while you're pretending like while you're scrolling in Excel spreadsheet, just typing numbers and pretending giving any of how many spreadsheets I just scrolled throughout my old job. A lot. Actually, Josh was close. He held up two fingers. It was the same two spreadsheets over and over again. It was two spreadsheets. Guys, like I mentioned, we brought Jeff on today to play fantasy fortune before we get started. I will explain the rules of this game and then I'm going to pass it off to Josh who is going to be running the game. I'll share the game while you're while you're explaining the rules. Perfect. This game is just like the popular TV show Wheel of Fortune, but with a fantasy football twist instead of spinning a wheel at the beginning of your turn, you are going to be trying to answer a 50 50 NFL or fantasy related trivia question. It could be something like who had more receiving yards last season. Was it Darnell Mooney or Marquis Brown? If you get the question correct, you will then get to guess a continent that is in the puzzle on the board. If you get that right, you get to go again. Another question, another letter, another question, another letter. But after three rounds, you will have an opportunity to solve the puzzle. If you cannot, we are going to move on to our next contestant, but you will bank that money. So if you can answer three trivia questions, get three letters, but can't solve that money still going in your bank for the entire game. At any point during your turn, except after a question has been asked, you can buy a vowel 100 for each one that shows up on the screen. You need a minimum of 500 in order to say you want to purchase a vowel or you can solve the puzzle and don't worry. If you solve the puzzle with zero dollars in there, there's a minimum of 1000. So we will throw $1,000 into your score, even if you aren't at that point yet. So if you want to go like full fantasy football genius and just solve the puzzle with no letters, you're still going to get $1,000 on that one. It's happened before. It has happened before. Whoever has the most money at the end of this game will be our fantasy fortune champion for today. You guys ready? Oh, yeah. I'm ready. Yeah. Are you guys ready? I'm still ready. It's the same question. It crosses everything. I do. I have one question now. Yes. So is Joey's job, is Joey the Vanna? Is that Joey's job? Like, he would be. He would be. Typically, we like to dress them up in a dress and but like if we were in person doing this, he absolutely would be up there like, you know, pressing the letters. There's no doubt about it. Yeah. I think he had to get some alterations on his dress and the dry cleaner or the seems just lost it. And so he's just been like desperately searching for a replacement. So that's why he hasn't made his appearance yet. Vanna, right? Joey's got it. You know, Vanna, right? Vanna, right? That's his alter ego. Anyway, let's get this started, guys. So I'm going to explain the rules perfectly except just for the first one we're going to do here. It's going to be a little bit different. Not, not accept. Look, we don't always do a Tulsa puzzle, but we're into a Tulsa puzzle just to determine who goes first. Whoever gets this rate is going to get $500 into their bank and we'll get to go first. Like I said, look, it's going to slowly unveil letters on the board. If you think you know who this player, it's going to be an NFL player is then just say your name. Jeff, if you think you know who it is, say Jeff or raise your and raise your hand. Whoever says their name first, I'm going to come to first. All right. Okay. Here we go. Got to remember my name. Got to remember my name. That's actually like, what do I say? Who was it that yelled my name? I'm under different. Accidentally outside. All right. Let's do our first Tulsa puzzle here. Like I said, if you think you can figure it out, just say your name and we'll come to you for a guess. You're in your $500 into your bank. You get this correct. Also a reminder, get out of the comments in the private chat if you have not generally smarter than we are generally this is an NFL player guys. It's a player in the NFL. I'm going to stick to mostly quarterbacks, running backs, wide receivers and tight ends here. You got it. Simon. Simon. Go ahead. Tyreek Hill. Oh, you're wrong. You know, no, no, I guess I'm out now. I was taking my just qualified from guessing. So it's only JL and Jeff here. Come on. Oh, golly. That wasn't what I was expecting. That was same. Excuse me. What? Oh, JL. Oh, got Jeff. JL. Dawson Knox. Dawson Knox. Yep. Come on. Yeah. I thought you were Buffalo guy. I was right there. I said it. Are you just beat me by millistack? JL. That's very true. That's very true. I was going to guess first and say CD lamb. So I almost said Dalvin Cook. You wouldn't have been alone. Dame in here in the chat saying CD lamb before before some of the, you know, I need to remember that the six four combo. There's a whole lot of them. I can't just be taking shots in the dark like that. The Cooper Cup. Oh man, another one. The list just keeps on growing. No, you're the only one. Yeah. Mr. Scampers was with you, Simon.  Shout out to Dave in the chat. Shout out to JR. Shout out to Dave for getting it right. Good job, guys. Good job. Also Dave in here with the, come on, Jeff. I had a lot of hate for that one there. I had it. It was a millistack. Fake fan. He goes, yeah, yeah. I'm a front runner. So, you know, that's what it is. I always like to hate on the favorites. Don't they? So JL ready? All right. Get in there. Yeah. I want to get into a first puzzle here. Okay. I'm ready for the first puzzle we are going to do. Let's do this. All right. I'm going to chat again. Me too. Great idea. We're going to do last name, same letter puzzle. So these are three last names here and they all start with the same letter. They're not on the same team. They don't play the same position. Maybe maybe one or two of them do. Who knows? But they all begin with the same letter. That's not a rule of what you're saying. They could be on the same team. They could be in the same position. They could be absolutely not part of the puzzle. Absolutely. So same, same letter that starts our last name. We're starting with JL here. JL are you ready for your first question? I'm assuming you don't want to solve quite yet. I do. All right. JL JL. I, you know, should we start out easier? Should we start out a little bit more difficult? Let's just start out. I'm going to start out easy. We're just going to start with PPR fantasy points. It's all going to be PPR related fantasy points. I think that's relatively easy. So JL who had more PPR fantasy points last season. Was it AJ Green or Jacobi Meyers? Jacobi Meyers. AJ Green. I'm sorry. Was Jacobi Meyers actually Jacobi Meyers had more PPR fantasy points last year.   I need a question. Ready for your question? Yeah, I need a question. We're going to stay in fantasy points for this round here. Simon, who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Was it Saquon Barkley or was it David Montgomery? David Montgomery. David Montgomery is correct. Let's go Simon. What letter would you like? T. He's going to take a T and there's one T. That's not where I thought it went. I will take another question. All right. Staying in the PPR fantasy points category. Simon, who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Was it Elijah Moore or was it Tim Patrick? Ooh, Tim Patrick is always higher than I thought he was, but Tim Patrick. Tim Patrick's correct. Tim Patrick is correct. Good job on that one, Simon. Elijah Moore just missed probably a point. That's what was the time. He missed a couple too many games for someone as consistent or maybe consistent is the wrong word. Underwhelming but consistent is Tim Patrick to Tim Patrick out and beat. I'll take the R. He's going to take the R. And by the way, Elijah Moore played in 11 games last season, 11 games. Oh, all right, Simon. So this is a pretty good, you know, little start for you. You have $2,000 in your bank. I got to remind you that this will be your last opportunity to buy value and I will buy an A. You're going to buy an A. Okay. Let's see. A there's one. I knew that I'll buy an E as well. He's going to buy an E. There are two E's. Well, that doesn't help very much. Okay. I'll just take another question. Oh, right. We can absolutely oblige you. Um, who had more? Oh, I know what I think. No, but I have to answer the question. Simon, who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Was it Miles Sanders or Chase Edmonds? Um, Chase Edmonds. Chase Edmonds is the correct answer. Simon, they both played in 12 games last year. Chase Edmonds more fantasy points though. Good job, Simon. Get this letter correct. Don't know it because I realized there's an E in the third name that I thought was down there. So I'm going to take this seat. That is probably a good call considering all three. There's three of them. I know the second one. Yes. Jail knows the second one. You got five seconds. I know the first two. Nope. I can't pull the last one. All right. But hey, that was an awesome round, Simon. That was an awesome round. Jeff, can I solve it? You can solve and you'll get $1,000 into your bank if you get it correct. Um, I will go with Cooper Carter Cooks. Cooks, very interesting and it's correct. Let's go, Jeff. Nice job, Jeff. Yes. Very good job, Cooks. That was a good pull, Jeff. I kept thinking Chase in that bottom one. Yeah. Yeah, I thought Chase Conner as well. You've been chubbed. Could have been chubbed before in the chat saying chubbed. Now, would have been better. Come on, Dave. Bank money or was it good to solve? I feel like I don't quite have that level of game theory. It depends. It's a risk if I would have money. I like to take the points in the meeting. It could have been Conner. No E, no E. No E. The E is already up ahead. Sorry, at the top. Sorry, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, Conner also just wouldn't fit in the bottom. Yeah, that's true. Yeah, yeah. So, hey, good job on that one. Yeah, yeah, I mean, you could have maybe got more points if you had to get the questions right too, right? So 8,000 points in your bank. I wouldn't say that's a bad start whatsoever. That was a good round all in all, guys. Give Joe another easy question here, Josh. Another easy one. What do you mean? Last time you said, do you want to start easy or hard? And then you said easy. Oh, gotcha, gotcha, gotcha. I didn't mean actually an easy question. I meant like an easy category of questions. Like just PPR fantasy. I just thought it was funny the way you phrased. You're like, okay, fine. You'll get the easy one. And then I'd miss. All right, let's move on to our next puzzle. Let's do it. This is a what are you doing puzzle? Okay. What are you doing? And that could be a variety of things, right? What are you doing? Jeff. Hey, maybe that's it. Things I've used in the past. A lot of people in this category. Question. Before I did running the 40 yard dash, playing Madden with my friends, throwing a perfect spiral. So, you know, keep those in mind when you're trying to solve this category. Jeff solved the last one. So JL is going to get the start JL. You want to question or you just want to call this a question. All right. So this is not going to be too simple. So I hope you got it. JL. My question for you is was Tony Pollard a top 20 PPR running back last season? Yeah. He wasn't. He was 28th. I'm sorry. Damn. I'm sorry. Simon, I want to come to you. I miss you. I want you here. Everyone out of the chat. Simon, you ready? Yeah. All right. I was making sure something didn't fit in that last word. Are you ready for your question? Right? I'm going to solve. All right. My question for you, Simon, was she's Claypool a top 30 wide receiver? No. He was not a top 30 receiver. He was 37. Good job, Simon. What letter would you like? Man, we're in uncharted territory. I've got four questions, right?  This is like the inverse Simon game. Usually I miss the question. So I was all bonk. You're getting ball. That's what I get. That's what I get for saying that. Oh, J.R. got it. Writing the 10 writing 10 commandments. That was good though. I like that one. Reading 10 commandments. Jeff, you're up. Yeah. No, I cannot solve. I need it. I'm going to need the question here. I can't even solve it. All right. So Jeff, in a four point per passing touchdown league and a four point per passing touchdown league was let's let's go with Mac Jones was Mac Jones a top 24 quarterback. Yes, he was. Good job. Let's go. Mac Jones was 18th overall. What letter would you like? Give me an N and Nancy, correct? Yes. There's one of them. There's one of them. Jeff, let's get you $500. You can buy a ball if you would like. Or we can move on to our question. Give me another one. Yep. Fair enough. Fair enough. Jeff, my question for you was Michael Pittman Jr. a top 24 wide receiver in PPR. I know he started very hot and then he really died off. I will go with. I will say yes. He ended up top 20. He'd I believe he's healthy all year. So you're right. He was number 17 overall. Good job, Jeff. What letter would you like? Give me S. S. There's one S. There's one S. One of these. So I got to tell you, Jeff, this is your last opportunity to buy Val's because if you get this next question, correct? You get the next letter, correct? You just got to guess for the puzzle, but you get to bank that money if you do. Um, you know, I'm not even close to having it in my mind. So I'm just going to go with another question. So instead of using my money to buy Val's, I think that's fair. I think that's fair. So Jeff, my question for you is, was Micah Sicki a top 12 Titan in PPR? Was he a top 12 Titan in PPR? Yes. He was. He was number eight. Let's go, Jeff. You're in a roll. Get this letter correct and you get to bank this money. I'm going to go with T. He's going to go with T. There's two T's. Two T's. Great job. Yeah, you're going to bank this money, Jeff. And I'm going to give you five seconds. Five seconds to solve. You're banking it regardless. Nothing. I got nothing. No, I don't have anything. J. L. What's up, buddy? Hey, I'm here. It's not a weirdo. I don't like using word buddy very much, but I do a lot. Yeah. I feel like most signs when people call me buddy, I take it as condescending. So I appreciate that. I feel like a lot of people do and I never intend that when I say it. So, you know, I always try to take it back, but I digress J. L. You ready for your question? Yeah. J. L. Was CD lamb at top 24 wide receiver last year in PPR? Yeah. He was. He was number 19. He was 19. What letter would you like? I will take a. I'll take an H. He's going to take an H. There's one H jail. There's one H. $500. Wham. Can buy that. I'll take a. Take another question. No, right. J. L. J. L. J. L. J. L. My question for you is was James Robinson a top 30 running back last season in PPR? He was. He was 24 overall. Actually 24 overall. I'm sorry, Simon. How's it going? Not great, Bob. Not great. Not great. Not. I need a question. All right. So my question for you is was Russell Wilson a top 24 quarterback in a half point and four points per pass in touch. Yes. He was. He was 15. Let's go. What letter? G. G. There's one G. No, I was hoping there was another one. Not. Not J. This or you call me Wimp. Yeah, there we go. Classic back and forth. I'll take another question. Oh, we're at it again. Aren't we? Romantics. Um, Simon. My question for you is was Brandon I UK top 40 wide receiver last season? Yes. He was. He was 35. Good job. What letter would you like? Stupid. Um, I'm going to go with, um, an M. An M is a mother. I'm sorry. I'm sorry, Simon. There's no M. Jeff, it got back to you. It got back to you. You have to thank your mind. But you don't really have any, uh, help here. Right. What is this? I don't know what the word. I do. I know the second word as well, Simon. I have a good idea. Oh, really? I haven't gotten there yet. I, I, is where I'm going there. So I like to abbreviate my words. Watch out. T. H. Me. Yeah, you never know. All right, Jeff. My question for you is was Miles Gaskin a top 30 running back last year? I will go with no, because he lost the job. So no, I'm sorry. He was, he was number 25. He was, I'm sorry, Jeff. I see he doesn't exist in my mind. So yeah, yeah, yeah, I know. It's one of those things when you're drafting, like you just see blank spots where he is. So that's, that's kind of where he is. I think that you automatically just roll over like where you're just like, you don't even consider them on the list. Like you're just going through and like you hope somebody else takes them before your pick. So yeah, I think we're in a best ball draft right now. Miles Gaskin is still available. We're pretty freaking deep. As he should be like, like we're really deep. Like we're drafting like rookies. We don't even know if we're in get drafted, I think, but JL, are you ready for your question? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Question. Oh, right. JL. My question for you is was Alvin Kamara a top 12 running back in a PPR league last year? No, no. I was he was number minutes. He was number eight. He was number eight. Simon. How's it going? I need a question. All right. My question for you, Simon, was Chris Godwin a top 10 wide receiver last year? It's going to be close. Him and Mike Evans were both like top 12 guys. If I remember correctly, I don't think if it was top 12 that you would ask it that close. I'm going to say yes. He wasn't. He wasn't. Where was he? No, he was 15 and I asked you 10 by the way. I asked you. Yeah, I know. But I was saying like I thought he was in that top 12 and that it was like you wouldn't have asked top 10 if he was 12. That would have been too close. Yeah. It was my thought process. And I thought he was in that 12 range. Damn. Jeff got back to 33 chat comments. Give me so. No, I'm just losing my mind on that. I know they already got it. Let's Jeff ready for a question. Yeah. Give me a question. Was Daniel Jones a top 20 quarterback last year? Was Daniel Jones a top 20 quarterback last year? And a four point per pass and touch up. No, he was not. He was not. He was not. What letter would you like? Give me an R. You sent him an R. It's a good choice. There's two of them. There's two of them, Jeff. I thought I knew the first word, but now I don't. Yeah. Yeah. I'll go with another. I'm pretty sure this is my last chance to buy a vowel. Or no, no, this was that was just your first letter. So you can buy a vowel here or next turn or you can take a question. Oh, right. Jeff was Pat frying me with the top 10 tight end last year and a peep your league. Um, no, I think he was just short. He was just short. He was 13. Good job, Jeff. Great. Nice. What letter would you like? Give me a. Of you. W. Yeah. Right. Yeah. It's getting weird. Oh, no, no views. No, no. You J. L. You scared me when you said W. I was like, oh, he knows it. Like you said W and I was like, oh, I understand it. After S right there, you're looking for something. Maybe I don't know. You know, if we were picking out player names, but like, man, I don't even know. See, getting inside the mind of Josh is just a real confusing to me. So it won't work. You have already identified the hardest part about this game. You like when you ask questions, you immediately forget all your fantasy knowledge and just think, what does Jeff want me to answer? Yes. Oh, right. J. L. You're up now. You ready for a question? Yeah. No, I need a question. And we're just going to stay in this category. J. L. Was T. Higgins a top 20 wide receiver in a PPR last year? Yeah. I'm sorry. He's 24. You guys hard. I mean, you guys hard now. Simon, you ready? Yeah. Simon was Leonard Farnette a top 10 running back last year. PPR. Yes. He was. He was number six. What letter would you like? C. Give me a C. He's going to get with a C here. There are two of them. That is not where I thought it was. Shoot. I will take another question. You're going to take another question. All right. Let me put this $500 back to you for you and you're going to get that money. Oh, I mean, I already said another question though. I know. I guess you did. Yes, you did. Oh God, all the marbles for this one. Simon was Javante Williams a top 12 running back last year in PPR. No. He wasn't he was 17. Let's go Simon. What letter? Let's see. How can I maximize my points here? Okay. Yeah. Okay. It was the right call probably. I would like to solve sacking the quarterback sacking the quarterback. That is absolutely correct. I mean, I got to tell you this was guessed. Oh, I don't know the word quarterback left my like football terminology during that. I was like, what could that last word be? Like it's not touchdown. It's not interception. 11. Tony. Tony. literally 11 minutes ago. I don't know how many letters. I think there's like one letter up there. Like the T was up there. Like, Damn Tony coming in with a key Tony killed it. And how many how many comments were there before when by the time you left like 40 some 40 or something. And Dames said Tony got it so early. They won't see it. Yeah. Almost almost. Yes. I know. I don't know. I, you know, I'm new. I'm learning the game. So that's what you're doing. You know, yeah. Well, hey, guys, I told you some examples running the 40 yard dash throwing a perfect spiral playing madam with friends. Also Tony Tony and Mr. Stamper's are correcting you that he got it with no letters. Really? Mr. Stamper said no letters as well. The chat. The chat's a little bit behind for us when it comes through. So it might have been the team might have been up there by the time that the comment came through. But you were impressive regardless. Awesome job. Damn Tony. Nice job. And that I was immediately like, you know, yeah, I saw that too. That was real. Jackie. Sacking the charcuterie. Hey, I thought for sure it was scoring the until the R came up on the board and I was like scoring the what like what the hell are they scoring? Like there's nothing that could be scored that fits in that blank. I thought the last word was heartbreaks and I was like singing the heartbreaks. No, I know it's scaring something and then scaring the heartbreaks. Scaring the heartbreak. Jeff, I'm going to ask you what do you want to do next?  Rookie scouting report.  Who jazzed?  Yeah, I was about to say that for a month. I'm going to say the Debbie guy. Dynasty lead at football guys host of a Debbie podcast. So I yeah, you know, I put this together and I plan on saying this regardless, but this is a rookie scouting report for Kenneth Walker jazz Walker a little bit of context there for you. Obviously, it's not going to involve his name. There's a little bit more help for you, but this is something that has been said about Kenneth Walker a quote, you might say. Simon got that last one correct, putting him in the lead. So Jeff, you are up first. Are you ready to play? All right, you're going to get this one jail. I can just feel it in my bones. Well, we're all wrong sometimes. Oh, right. So rookie scouting for for Kenneth Walker. Jeff, we are doing yards. We're going to play some yardage games here. Actually, I'm going to make it a little bit more a little bit more fun than I originally intended Jeff with within 100 yards. Tell me how many receiving yards CD lamb had last season? 1,050. 1,050 is within 100. He had 1,102. I was I was worried you're gonna say just 1,000. I'll be like, oh, great job, Jeff. You are correct. You get to pick a letter s is going to go with an s and there are two of them. There are two. Oh, I thought there would be more up there. He thinks so. A lot of words, a lot of letters, but only two s's. Jeff, you can buy a valve here. We can go to another question. Another question, please. All right. We're going to stay with this yardage category and trying to guess what it is exactly. Jeff within 100 rushing yards. Tell me how may rushing yards. Jonathan Taylor had last season. It was a lot. I'll give you a hint. 1700. 1700 is just outside. 1811. I am sorry, Jeff. Almost 1725. Yeah, that was I almost said 225 is frustrating. 111 yards away. I'm sorry, Jeff, but J.L.  All right. I need a question. J.L. Tell me how many rushing yards. Antonio Gibson had last season. New Gibson. He had. I'm going to go with a thousand and a thousand and a hundred. 1100 is within 100. He had 1037. I liked it. Yeah, the good job. What letter? I'll take a T. T. There are four of them. J.L. Four T's got a lot of money to buy valves. If you want to do so. Question. All right, J.L. Within 100 receiving yards. How many receiving yards did Chase Claypool have last year? I'll go with I'll go with 800.  And that was such a good guess. He had 860. Let's go, J.L. All right. I will go with an R. He's gonna take an R. There's three of them, J.L. You are building up some mula. $3,500 in your round bank. You can last chance to buy a valve here. Yeah. No. All right. He just wants a question. J.L. Within 250 passing yards. Ooh, you nervous? You nervous, J.L.? How many passing yards did Kirk Cousins have last year? 250. 150. This is so wrong. Kirk Cousins. I'll go with I'll go with I'll go with 40, 4,400. 4,400s within 250 at 4,221. 4,221. I knew he wasn't in that upper echelon. I just didn't know how low I wanted to go. J.L. Get this letter correcting. You bank a lot of money here.  I know I'm gonna go with a P. He's gonna go with a P. There's one of them. Yeah. Whoa. J.L. Of course one there. You get to bank that money and I'm gonna give you five seconds, but I don't have any idea. Yeah. That's my idea. Simon. I'm so intimidated that you guys did so well on these like specific questions because I never do that. Well, on the East was forgetting 11 yards away. I'm saying is like even though we missed it, both of you guys like clearly exhibited knowledge of their yardage and I'm just sitting here like okay, like I'm about to be like 800 off on one of these guys. Well, Simon, you ready for your question? Let's do it. I got no problem receiving yards with 100 receiving yards. Tell me how many receiving yards Tyler Lockett had last year. Oh, well, you see. Thank you. Once I'm just access my memory bank. So that was a little bit of a tougher one. Maybe I don't know. We'll see. He had exactly exactly. I'll be impressed. 1005 receiving yards. I'm way too high aren't I? 1005 is a little too low. He had 1175. That's why I was saying it was tough. I he actually had the eighth most receiving yards in the league last year. That's wild. When I knew it was over a thousand, but I thought it was barely over a thousand. He was good without Russell Wilson. Like he was like actually still putting up decent numbers. Jeff, you're back on the clock. Yeah, back on the clock. Back on the clock. Hurry up. Make your pick here. Make my pick. I will go with another question. All right, Jeff, within 100 receiving yards. Tell me how many Travis Kelsey had last year. I will go with 1150. 1150 is 25 yards away at 1125. Good job, Jeff. What letter would you like? Give me. Let's go with a C. You didn't take a C. There's three of them. Good guess. C is a tricky letter, but it definitely was involved in this puzzle. Jeff, do you want to buy any vowels or you just wanted our question? Give me another question. All right. Um, very similar within 100 receiving yards. How many receiving yards that Cal pits have last year? Cal pits, I would say 875. He had 1026 receiving yards last year. What? Not like, I'm not saying what to your answer. Just like, yeah. I would have been pretty good for fantasy. So one touchdown all year. It's ridiculous. Who was the player you asked about? Kyle pits. Kyle pits. Yeah. Insane. Jail. I will take a question.  Nope. I was just filling in my puzzle on my notepad. Well, Jail within 100 receiving yards. Tell me how many receiving yards Tyler Boyd had last year. 675. A little low. I had 828, 828. Simon. Oh yeah. I got this one. You got it. Yeah. Simon within 100 rushing yards. Tell me how many rushing yards Alvin Kamara had last season. Um, I'm between two numbers, but they're like 200 apart. So maybe I just go right in the middle and put the difference. I'll say 700. 700. He had 898. I'm sorry. 800. I was between 800 and 600. I remember being much lower than I thought it was, but Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Um, 898 last year only 3.7 yards per carry. Hey Jeff, back on the board or back on the board back on the clock, you know, you know what I'm saying, um, you ready for a question? Absolutely. Jeff, how many rushing yards within 100 did Elijah Mitchell have last season? 950. 930 at 63. Great job, Jeff. What letter would you like to give me and an N there's three of them, Jeff. There's three ends. Gotta do some money in your round bank here. You want to buy any values or you just want to keep on pushing with the questions. Um, give me another question. Well, I hope you know your quarterback yards because we're going back over there within 250 passing yards. Tell me how many passing yards Matthew Stafford had last season. Within 250, um, 400 or 4,625 you are with 4,886, uh, which I don't think that's in it. That's not, it's just outside. I think 2,875 is, oh man, you were away all fight 11 again. Oh no. The 11th strike again. 11th. I am sorry, Jeff. We're moving on to JL. I can tell if you had gotten it right or wrong for. I'm still not sure if I got it right. Yeah. Oh, you can see all of us just sitting there trying to do math in our hand. Yeah. 625. You're in a number. You're so close. Uh, JL, you ready for a question? Yeah. Within 100 receiving yards, tell me how many receiving yards Mike Evans had last season. Mike Evans, um, have a decent amount. I'm going to go with, I'm going to go with 1,000, 1,100. That's within 100, 1,035 he had. What letter would you like to show? Uh, I'll take a, the only ones I know are vows. Yeah. I'll go with, uh, uh, you let it go. And each, I'm sorry, JL. I'm sorry. Simon. Yeah. I mean, uh, not well. I am not good at these questions. Well, within 100 receiving yards, tell me how many receiving yards Deontay Johnson had last year. Well, this one's easy, obviously. Um, yeah. This one, if I miss it, it's just out of sympathy for my fellow competitors. Um, Deontay Johnson had roughly. About 1,005 receiving yards last year. 1,161 Simon, 1,161.  Um, yes, we're back to you. How's it going? Good. How are you? I've never been better. I'm, I'm feeling great. I'm fooling you guys with these questions. I love it. Jeff, within 100 receiving yards, tell me how many receiving yards Jamar Chase had last season. Um, 17, 1700. I had a little high, 1455. Oh, JL. I mean, just keep pushing here. JL, you ready? Yeah. Uh, within 100 receiving yards. Tell me DJ Morris. Uh, 10, 900. Not too low, too low. 1,157 Simon. And after this, I'm going to expand the ranges. So we get, we get through this puzzle, but Simon, uh, sure. Uh, yeah. Yeah. Simon, uh, tell me how many receiving yards a Mario Cooper ad. Um, he had 1,005 receiving yards too much. 865 Jeff. I'm expanding the ranges so we can get through this puzzle a little bit. Uh, within 200 rushing yards, tell me how many rushing yards Damian Harris had last season. Within 200, um, I will go with 1,050. That is within 200. Uh, he had 929. What letter would you like? M. He's going to take an M. There's no M. Jeff. There's JL. I think it might be only vowels left. Yeah. I'll take a question. Oh, yeah. With that, I'll tell you this, you're wrong. Uh, the fourth word. All mouths would be pretty weird. Yo, we, um, JL within 200 receiving yards. Tell me how many receiving yards Devontes met that last year. Uh, he had, he had 850. That's within 100 916. What letter would you like? Uh, I'll go with a L. An L. Oh, there's two of them. There's two of them, JL. There we go. There we go. JL, you can buy a vowel. He's talking about him. Just for the sanity of everybody involved here. Uh, I'll take an, an O. Oh, there's three of them, JL. And you can buy another one if you want. I knew those JL. Could you buy a vowel that helps? I'll buy an A. It's gonna buy an A. And there's five of them. You can't buy any more vowels, but you definitely opened up this puzzle a little bit, right? Okay. JL, you want a question? I'll take another. Actually, I would like, um, yeah, I'll take another question. All right. Within 200 rushing yards, within 200 rushing yards. Tell me how many rushing yards James Connor had last year. Oh, I got it. Uh, he had, he had a thousand. You're saying he had a thousand. Um, and I am sorry. That is incorrect. Uh, 752 actually. Um, Simon, you said you'd know it. Forget your questions. I don't want to answer any more of these. I've gotten every single one of them wrong. Um, yards after contact will continue as a pro yards after contact will continue as a pro Kenneth Walker. You agree, Jeff? That's absolutely. Yeah, I like Kenneth Walker. I think I like Kenneth Walker than most people out there. Um, I'm not saying he's above resolve for me, but I think he's closer than a lot of people have him personally. What do you think about that, Jeff? I agree. Yeah. And you know, I think it's very close and I don't blame anybody putting him above breeze hall realistically, but I think it's a tier of two at the top. Yeah. Yeah. But I feel like in drafts, uh, and all the drafts I've been seeing in breeze hall early a second round or third round and you know, Kenneth Walker, you're probably getting them in the fifth, six, you know, somewhere around that range. Right. So there's definitely some separation there and the perception of the public, I would say. Yeah. And we're looking for landing spots realistically draft capital landing spot where they end up. And I don't know that there's a great landing spot for any of them, but I could see, you know, I think it is closer than what most people recognize. Yeah. I'm with you. I'm with you. Uh, but everyone's taking breeze hall over Kenneth Walker at this point, right? At this point. Yes, I am. Yeah, you have. You kind of have to. Yeah. I'm with you. All right. Is it getting next? Yeah. Go ahead and follow up question for Jeff. Yeah, yeah. Is breeze hall and Kenneth Walker is their position in rookie drafts? Um, destination proof know what I mean? Like whenever the NFL draft happens, usually sometimes it shuffles it around, but guys like Stakwon Barkley, it didn't matter what team he landed on. He was the number one overall pick. Um, is there a landing spot combination? Like, or is breeze hall far enough ahead of Kenneth Walker for you that landing spots not going to change the order in which you draft them? No, landing spot won't change that order. Um, it might move them closer together within tears. And I think that right now when you're in rookie drafts, you're kind of hunting for who's going to be that 103. And if Kenneth Walker lands in a great spot, you know, I think he could seize that certainly.  But I do expect that a we're pretty safe on Kenneth Walker, Kenneth Walker being the number two, breeze hall being the number one, people have that Jonathan Taylor Clyde Edwards whole air in their mind and it's just not going to happen this year. Yep. I think what sets breeze apart is his past catching production in college where Kenneth Walker didn't really show that. So it feels like his like landing spot regardless. He's going to have a role. I think that's what the leading most people to draft breeze hall above Kenneth Walker. Let's keep going here guys. I'm going to just do let's do this. Let's do this. Let's do a quarterback running back wide receiver in tight end. I like these puzzles straightforward. The first line's a quarterback. The second line's a running back. The third line's a wide receiver. The fourth line's a tight end. They are somewhat related, but you you're not going to know how they're related, but there's there's something going crazy in my mind that makes them related. So Simon got the last one. Jeff, you are up first here. Are you ready? Absolutely. Let's go. How do you like receptions, Jeff? You track receptions at all? You know me. I'm a numbers guy. So, you know, I like your numbers. Well, let me let me ask you this. Who had more receptions last year? Who had more receptions last year? Was it Michael Pittman or was it Chris Godwin? I'll say Chris Godwin had more receptions. He did. He absolutely did. Chris Godwin had more catches than Michael Pittman. What letter would you like, Jeff? Give me an S. He's going to take an S. There's two of them. There's two of them, Jeff. It's going to give you $1,000 into your round bank. You want to buy it, Val? For now. Um, no, I'm good. I'll give me another question. We're going to stay with the receptions here. Jeff, uh, who had more receptions last year? Was it Amon Raul St. Brown or DK Metcalf? Amon Raul came on late. Um, I'll go with DK had more receptions. I'm sorry. It was actually Amon Raul St. Brown 90 to 75. Actually, um, JL. Wow. 12 touchdowns on 75 catches is what DK Metcalf had. That's the only at 75. That's insane. Exactly. What do you add? That's not like, I know that I would have assumed it just from knowing that number that it was much higher. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. All right, JL. You ready? Yes, sir. More Sanities receptions. Who had more receptions last year? Was it Cole Beasley or Tyler Lockett? You would ask me a Cole Beasley question. I would, wouldn't I? I'm going to go with, I'm going to go with Lockett. It's Cole Beasley. And I'm pretty sure I asked you a Tyler Lockett, uh, Yards question. He was really high. You were surprised by that? That was me. Oh, okay. Okay. Simon, what's up? Simon, you ready for a question? Yeah. Hit me with that Tyler Lockett again. No, we're going to avoid Tyler Lockett, but how about we're going to save that for me? Brandon Cooks. Who had more receptions? Brandon Cooks or Terry McLaurin? Brandon Cooks. Brandon Cooks did. I mean, like, I knew you would not like that question, but it was significant. 90 to 77. Yeah. Um, good job. And would you like an N? Yep. Okay. Three of them. Three of them, Simon. Three of them.  I knew, I knew those three. I know the first name and the last name. I did not know the two middle. I was hoping an N would show up in the middle there. So I need another question. Well, Simon, who had more catches last season? Who caught more passes last year? Was it Christian Kirk or wasn't Marquis Brown? You know what? The Ravens threw a lot more last year than people were expecting them to. I was about to say, but Kirk had those games with the Hopkins. Um, Kirk. It was Marquis Brown. I thought myself out of it. I got in my own head and I knew that was good. I started building up Marquis Brown and I was like, no. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I knew it. I knew it was with you a little bit. That was a good one. Oh, right. Jeff. Yeah. Yeah. You ready? Absolutely. Yeah. Who had more receptions last year, Jeff? Who had more receptions last year? Was it Mike Williams or was it a DJ Moore? A Moore. DJ Moore is correct. Good job, Jeff. What letter would you like? An R. An R. I'm sorry. There's no longer. There's no R. Wow. That blew up my second one. I'll take another question. All right. Who had more receptions last year? I'm going to ask you a top heavy one here. Who had more receptions? Was it Justin Jefferson or Devonte Adams? Devonte Adams. Devonte Adams had more. I used number two in terms of all wide receivers and Justin Jefferson was four. What letter would you like? I will take a T. It's going to take a T. There's two of them. There's two of them, Jail. Okay. I'll take another question. All right, Jail. Who had more catch on that? Stay with these top heavy ones a little bit. Who had more catches? Was it Jalen Water or Tyree Kill? Tyree Kill. Tyree Kill is correct. Good job. What letter would you like? I'll take an L. I'll take an L. The choice. Oh, buddy. Oh, buddy. Jail's got some months. Jail's got some months. It's just that running. I don't know what that means. Months. You got some months. I'll take a, can I buy a VAL? You can. Please do. This is your last chance to do so, so you better. I'll buy an A. He's going to buy an A. There's four of them, Jail. There's four A's. Okay. I'll buy a, I'll buy a... You got it, Jeff. Jeff's face says he knows it. I? Yeah. I know it. I know it. I know all but the running back. And I'll take a E. He's going to buy the E. There's one of them. Oh, I'll take an L. I'll take an L. There's one and there's no more VALs, as you can see on the screen here. No more VALs. What is that? Okay, okay. I guess I'll take another question. All right, the man, what's another question? Jeff's going crazy up there. No, he's just killing me. I love it. I love it. Jail, my question for you is who had more catches last season? Who had more catches last season? Was it Kendrick Bourne or Tyler Boyd? I'm going Kendrick Bourne. I'm sorry, Jail. It was, it was, it was Tyler Boyd. It was Tyler Boyd. Of course it was. 65. 67. Simon. It seems like you might have trouble with one or two. I need a question. Just one. I've had the other three now, but that second one, the running back is tough. Fair enough. I'm going to hear it. It's going to drive me crazy. Who had more catches last season? Was it Mike Williams or was it, let's, let's go with, I don't know, I want to cancel Mike Williams. He's not, his option didn't match anymore. We already used that example. Okay. What catches last season was it Cortland Sutton or Marvin Jones? Coral and Sutton. It was Marvin Jones. It was Marvin Jones. It was Marvin Jones. Marvin Jones, 73 catches. Oh shoot. I got it. Yeah. You know, I'm going to solve the puzzle. All right. Go ahead. You get it. Tanahill, Jacobs, Williams. Oh, so guys, just so you know how I organized these guys, it was in terms of. So handsome. Yeah. Yeah. I wouldn't check out. This is all wrong. If it's, it's a handsome order, Josh. It was the 12th overall in terms of fantasy points. So Tanahill is 12th overall in terms of four point. Four point per passing touchdowns. Fantasy points. Jacobs. PPR. 12th running back. Yeah. So on and so forth. Mike Williams. 12 and 12. All right. You probably fit. We can fit one more puzzle in. I don't know if a smaller one makes it easier or harder, but I guess I'll do a smaller one. Oh, yeah. Dame got that one first. Of course. It was probably like 10 minutes ago as well. Right. It was five minutes ago. It was five minutes ago. All right, guys, we are doing a place here. Just so you know, places I've used in the past, the concession stand, the pro football hall of fame, Charlotte, North Carolina. They're all football related because Charlotte is where the Panthers play. So it's a place. It's football related. Keep those in mind. Concession stand, pro football, all fame, Charlotte, North Carolina. So it's a place. It's football related. Keep those in mind. Concession stand, pro football, all fame, Charlotte, North Carolina. So it could be a little off the wall a little bit. Who got that last one? Oh, Jeff. Yes. Jeff is going to get to bank that money. We have such a close game. Jail, what letter would you like? I mean, do you want a question? I'll take a, I'll take a N and I'll take a question. You can have a question. Man, I so bad want to go to all time stats, but we're, I'm just going to delay the game so hard if we do that. So I will not, I will not even though I really want to, let's do it. Let's do touchdowns. Let's do touchdowns. Jail, who had more rushing touchdowns last season? Who had more rushing touchdowns last season? Wait, what is this? This is not the right thing. My touchdowns when someone goes into the end zone with the football in their hands. And it's not, not on a two point conversion and not their own end zone. Jail, who had more rushing touchdowns last season? Was it Devin Singletary or was it Elijah Mitchell? Mitchell. I'm sorry. It was Devin Singletary. Seven to five. Seven to five. Simon, you want a question? Yes. Who had more rushing touchdowns last season? Who has more rushing touchdowns last season? Was it Clyde Edwards, a layer or was it Corderole Patterson? Well, Patterson didn't have very many, but neither did Edwards. Patterson. Patterson had six. Clyde Edwards, the layers four. Good job. What letter would you like? I remember being surprised that his was, I know six is not super low of a number, but with the success he had at the beginning of the season, I expected to be higher. I'll take an S. An S. There's one S. There's one S, Simon. I thought there was an S there. I'll take another question. All right. He's taking another question and we are staying in the touchdowns category. Simon, who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Was it Debo Samuel or was it Tyler Lockett? Debo had what? He had six and eight. I can't remember which one went to which. And then I don't remember. I will go Lockett. Lockett is correct. And Debo Samuel had six receiving touchdowns last year. Eight rushing, right? He had six receiving and he had eight rushing. That is absolutely correct. I just can't remember which one went where. I'll take a T. It's going to take a T. There's one T. There's one T, Simon. So last chance, my bell. Nope. All right. Simon, who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Was it Hunter Renfro or was it a Mari Cooper? Hunter Renfro. Hunter Renfro is absolutely correct. Good job. What letter would you like? You get to bank this if you get this right. A D. Didn't take a D. There's one D. Well, I have to take a guess now, right? Yup. Wimbly Stadium. No, no, that's not right. That's not right. But Jess up where they play the London games. Yeah. Yeah, I think so. I think I'm not even sure. I don't even think. Wimbledon, right? That's the tennis thing. The Wimbledon. Yeah, you nailed it. That's exactly right. Wimbledon is how you pronounce it. Yeah. I knew it. Yep. So Jeff. Yeah. How you feeling? You want a question? Give me a question. All right. The man was a question and we are going to go to. We're going to stay in the touchdowns category. Like I said, who had more passing touchdowns last season or more passing touchdowns last season? Was it Dak Prescott or Kyler Murray? I will go with Dak Prescott had more. He did. He did. He did. What level would you like? Give me an M. An M. There's two M's, Jeff. There's two M's. You want our question? I do want another question. All right. I will stay with the passing touchdowns. Who had more passing touchdowns last season? One more passing touchdowns last season. Carson Wentz or Aaron Rodgers? Aaron Rodgers. Yeah. That was kind of easy. But, you know, we all get one. What letter would you like? Give me a, I mean, I got nothing. L. He's taking L. I am sorry. There's no L. I'm sorry. I'm going to take a shot. Okay. I'm going to take a shot. Hi Mark Stadium. Hi Mark Stadium is absolutely the correct answer. That's going to get you this money. And I think that's going to wrap it up for us today. Simon. You're your winner today. I'm in. Great games. I'm in. That's a high high score. Hi Mark score. Yeah. It was a high score. I'm embarrassed. I am so embarrassed because I didn't even know where Hi Mark Stadium was. And I still don't know where Hi Mark Stadium is. The only reason you want to let me know. Oh, that's the Buffalo Bills. That's the Buffalo Bills. Park like. All the stadiums are fresh in my mind because I had the stadium category for Jeffrey earlier this week. I'm pretty. I don't think I would have known. I'm at game. Got this before any letters. Wow. Mr. Scammers that she's staying. No letters. Yeah. Puzzles today. Josh. They like them. Yeah. They were some good puzzles. Jeff. Thank you so much for taking the time to come on today. So much fun. Free streaming with you. And now. Now you just got to come back. We rigged the game. So you would lose so that you felt more incentivized to come back to get your redemption. It's what happened on your shoulder. You guys know all you have to do is ask. I will always be there to help you guys out. Anyway, I can. And thank you so much for having me on. You guys are fantastic. Thank you very much. Jail just bats his eyelashes and Jeff says fine. I'll come on. But guys, if you're not. If you're not already following our friend Jeff on Twitter, go and follow him right now at for whom J bell tolls right there below his face on the screen. Truly one of the best follows in the space. He's a man when it comes to dynasty and Debbie, if you're looking for resources on that, he knows his redraft too, but this man's an expert on dynasty and Debbie. So make sure you follow him for all of that information. Guys, that is going to be it for us today before we go. Another reminder, if you have not done so already and you're watching this video, subscribe to Fandal on YouTube right now or follow them on Twitch. We are here every Friday at 6 p.m. Eastern time doing this. And there's a whole team of awesome content creators doing stuff at the other times that aren't 6 p.m. Eastern on Friday.  We are live every day Monday through Friday at 3 p.m. Eastern time doing nothing but this. We just like to play games guys obsessed. We are a little bit obsessed. It's maybe unhealthy, maybe a character flaw, but you know what it works and I enjoy it. Guys, that is going to be it for us this Friday. Another big thank you to Jeff and thank you to everybody in the chat who played along with us today and hung out with us this afternoon. Love you all until Monday. We are out of here. Adios everybody. Bye bye. Love you guys. Let's go.


good morning. I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you this morning about the use of serum biomarkers in neobascular age-related macular degeneration, excuse me, poor timing. Macular degeneration is a disease that affects immaculate, primarily primarily change and loss of central vision. And as we can see from this Amphler grid, as the disease progresses, this loss of central vision can be can be quite dramatic and devastating for the patient. It's the leading cause of irreversible blindness in patients over the age of 50 in the Western world. There are two primary sub-subs types of macular degeneration. First the dry subtype, which is usually not associated with visual loss. And then this can progress to wet or neobascular macular degeneration, which is essentially associated with formation of new blood vessels and can cause loss of vision. Roughly a quarter of all patients over the age of 75 have some features of AMD and 80% of those individuals do have, looks like it's cutting off just the bottom of my slide here, but 80% have to neobascular disease. Now how does this disease progress? Degenerative changes that are again usually not associated with visual loss begin with the accumulation of extracellular protein and lipids called drusen that that form within the retina in different layers. At BRUCC's membrane, the RP, and also at photoreceptor interfaces. And as this is a disease of progression, about 50% of individuals with extensive macular drusen by years, and these are considered late changes in the disease and can be vision-threatening. So the characteristic of the onset of neobascular age-related macular degeneration, it's associated with an acute vision loss that can be permanent if left untreated. NV AMD represents 90% of all blindness caused by AMD and as we see in this graphic, dry AMD begins with drusen formation causing thinning of the retina and this can progress to abnormal blood vessel formation which can break through membrane causing vision loss. In terms of risk factors for the disease, it's all in the name. Age-related. Age is the most prominent demographic risk factor, whereas environmental risk factors, the most prominent of which is cigarette smoking, which represents a two to three-fold increase in risk compared with non-smokers. This is related to dry and wet macular degeneration with a stronger correlation to wet. High blood pressure as well as overexposure to sunlight are also risk factors, as well as diet, diets that are high in fats, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, as well as hyalinolic acid, can double the risk of wet AMD, whereas, in contrast, low linoleic acid and diets high in omega-3 fatty acids. Another reason to choose the fish at lunch today rather than the Twinkie or other snack foods. Genetics has also been found to play an important role in AMD. There have been 19 loci that have been identified to date and these genes regulate a number of different physiologic processes from complement activity, metabolism, matrix remodeling as well as angiogenesis. And one of the most prominent and strongly associated genes is the ARMS2, also called the HTRA1 locus, which is thought to be involved in matrix stability. Additionally, a strong correlation between genetic locus and AMD is the mutational change of the CFH molecule involved in innate immunity. There are two VEGFA polymorphisms that are thought to contribute to AMD susceptibility, as well as the KDR gene, the VEGF receptor 2, that may also correlate with an increased risk of AMD. But this relationship is unclear at this time. In comparison with genetic risk factors, serum biomarkers are less well categorized. There are numerous different serologic biomarkers that have been identified to name a few. Elevations in inducible co-stimulator, MDA, superoxide dismutase, LDLEO2. The most well understood and well studied serum biomarker by far and away is CRP, which can be a non-specific biomarker elevated in a number of different conditions, including temporal arthritis. But a recent meta-analysis has shown that high levels of CRP are associated with a two-fold increase in the likelihood of having late AMD. Now, this here says elevated serum VEGF receptor 2 is also a potential serum biomarker, but this relationship is not well understood at this point, as this is a monomeric molecule and does not have a high opinion for VEGFA. So, VEGF is well understood to have a very important role in the pathogenesis as well as the treatment of NDA. SFLT1 is a molecule that binds and sequesters VEGF, thus reducing its angiogenic activity. So, SFLT1 is anti-angiogenic. SFLT1 is the subject of what my group studied, and it was found that the RP in the RPE SFLT1 is required for sub-retinal vascular demarcation, as well as in patients with NVAMD. SFLT1 is decreased. A knockout, a recent study showed that knockout of SFLT1 in the RPE did show spontaneous coroidal neobascularization. Now, SFLT1 can be found in the serum, it can be measured in the serum. So, that brought the question, if it can be measured in the serum, does SFLT1 also decrease in patients with NVAMD, as was previously seen in the RPE, as well as in the serum, as either a byproduct or a cause of the condition. And so, we performed a study in which 205 patients from Belfast, Ireland had their serum SFLT1 measured, and it was found that SFLT1 was significantly decreased in these patients compared with early AMD and their controls. Also, of clinical importance, there's a step-wise correlation between SFLT1 levels and the risk of developing AMD. For each 10-point increase in SFLT1, the odds of having NVAMD decreases by 27%. We also found that in patients over 73 with SFLT1 levels less than 80, there's a six-fold higher risk of developing NVAMD. And we see here in this box line-in-box graph that, in fact, SFLT1 level concentration is significantly decreased when compared with non-AMD and early AMD. Also, this graphic that indicates an estimation of probability of risk of progression to NVAMD from early AMD. This finding in reduced AMD does have a pathophysiological link that makes quite a lot of sense. In terms of, SFLT1 is the highest affinity receptor for VEGSA, and it has two different isomers. There's SFLT1 or soluble FLT1 and membrane-bound FLT1. The unique characteristics of FLT1 in that it has six rather than seven extracellular IgG-like domains, no transmembrane domain as well as no tyrosine kinase, allows it to be soluble and free to interact with VEGF, thus blocking VEGF's interaction with the receptor and preventing angiogenesis. Whereas when SFLT1 is reduced or absent, VEGF is free to interact with the receptor and angiogenesis progresses. So in summary, SFLT1 in neovascular AMD patients here was found to be reduced compared to early controls. And so we understand that SFLT1 is likely to be associated with the development of neovascular AMD. Although I have to say that we can't necessarily determine causality in regard to SFLT1 because it's uncertain whether or not the decrease in SFLT1 is, it proceeds or is a consequence of neovascular AMD. However, there is a, there does seem to be a very strong correlation in patients over the age of 73 with SFLT1. They have a dramatically increased risk of neovascular AMD. The observed effect was not affected by age, gender, or smoking history. And the sample of 205 patients was not large enough to look at interaction with different gene loci. So as we look forward to the future, there will be serologic panels that will be designed, including CRP, EOTaxin-2, and Homo-cysteine, and possibly SFLT1. And these could be very, very important tools clinically to be able to, whether it be home monitoring or more close clinical observation to have earlier detection, earlier diagnosis, leading to earlier intervention, and possibly preventing vision loss from the onset of NBAMD. I'd like to thank Dr. Hiro Uehara for his significant contribution to this work, as well as Dr. Chikvarthi from Belfast Ireland for helping with samples, and Dr. Bala on body. Any questions?


What's going on, everyone? Sam here at Layton Sports Cards. Ripon 22, 23, Penini Spectre basketball hobby, 8 box full case break, number 8 random teams, tiered random team style. Look again at your random results. As always, combine those on the website, under the results tab, as well as the link in chat. Good luck. Not quite Rashid. I don't think Rashid will be at the top. Rashid, why don't Rashid sneak at like 9, I want to say? There's a lot of work up there. Oh yeah. Got to work with Shawn twice a week to get him to number one. Yeah, I got part of that level. Although his partner in crime is so real close. I know. Real close. Real close. I can't believe the whole team I thought they'd do in Chicago.  Just the entire time. I thought, what's happening? Someone else just yelling Pasoano at you. Awesome dude. That is a Tyus Jones, Menagerie, Desmond Bain, and DeMonte Savonis. There's Isaiah Mobley, Celestial RPA to 99. No, yeah, it's a 99.  I think the Chiefs is probably the safer pick there. Celestial, Anthony Simons, student 149. Mark Williams, and Sadiq Beck. Aspiring Rookie Auto, Musa Diabate to 99. Orlando Robinson to 149 for the Heat. DeAndre Aitin, Andrew Nemhardt Rookie. This is pretty sick. To 49, Vin Baker. I just won there. Congrats, Bucks. That's sick. I'm in on that for sure. Kerry Trent Jr. to 99. Ogia Nunnaby and Anthony Edwards. And wow. Seven of 10. Shade on Sharp. RPA going to the Blazers. Chintazi. Congrats, buddy. That is a banger right there. Seven of 10. Shade on Sharp. Let's go, man. That'll work. Get that into a mag for you, Chintazi. Congrats, buddy. Prism Asia T-Mall down to 20. Two go. Down to 20, everybody. Go the way there. Jordan Goodwin Rookie to 149. Jeron Jackson, Christian Wood. And that is to 49. Trevor Keels with the wheels. Three-colored RPA for the Picks. 49, C.H. McCollum Astral, Pelicans. Hey, Wesley Rookie. Calvaryches. Nice one here, dude. To 49, Clyde the Glide. Clyde Drexler for the Blazers. Blazers killing it, man. Sky-high signatures. Celestial, James Hardin to 149. What's up, basketball lover? Lava, lava. Two 99, Deontay Murray, Deep Space Auto. Basketball lover. Deontay Murray. Marble, Damian Lillard, two of five. Grats Blazers, dude, killing it. This is the Blazers right now. Thanks, brother. Isaiah Mubly, I appreciate that, buddy. Appreciate you. Dearon Fox, two 99, Michael Cooper. Four of 99 going to the Lakers. Glusherous legends. Yeah. Tomorrow, 4.20 p.m. eastern time. Rich, Michael Rubin and Derek Jeter will be ripping a high-end baseball mixer on the Fanatics Live app. So check that out, everybody. Ja-Marin, two 49. That is gonna be a lot of fun, man. Deontay Graham and Alfred Shengum. Malachi Branham, two 10 on the RPA. Eight of 10, congrats, Spurs. Ice one there as well. Oh, yeah, we do fantasy football. Hell, yeah. Hell, yeah. We got a league here. Josh Green to 149. Jalen Williams Rookie. Clay Thompson. And to 49, another Michael Cooper auto. Live Cop, which doesn't isn't great. See what I ended up getting in my other league. Here's my team in my school league that I auto-drafted. Herbert McCaffrey Pollard, St. Brown, Metcalf, Friar Muth, Olave Watson, Saints defense, McPherson, Miles Sanders, Jared Cook, Jonathan Taylor, Jerry Judy, Brian Robinson, David and Joku and Dak Prescott. Not bad, man. Yeah. I don't think they're bad, man. Oh, they really aren't. So it was here in a free... Garnett to 99? Yeah, true. And you're screwed. How about a little heads-up on that? Levine and Drew Holliday? No. No? That's not. This will be a random to 99 Elton Brand between the Clippers and Sixers. I've got it. In this league, I have Stafford and Jimmy G. That's my quarterbacks. Because they're not important. I got Holmes and... Vacell to 149. Russ. Orlando Robinson, Cade Cunningham. Another nice auto to 10. Gold Allen Iverson. Congrats on that, Philly. Go into Brian. Brian, congrats, my man. That is awesome, dude. Thanks, basketball. I appreciate that, buddy. You can add the answer. Three golds so far. Yeah, I appreciate that, man. Again, 22 go. Patrick Baldwin to 99. Yeah, another really nice auto. Good lord. Herbert Jones, Andrew Wiggins to 199. RPA, Kennedy Chandler for the Grizzlies. Jordan Goodwin to 199. Osmane Zhang and Tim Hardaway. That sounds pretty cool. Lakers and Grizzlies. Yeah, this'll be a random. 65 from 99. Powell Gasol between the Lakers and the... Grizzlies. Never heard of anyone punting at the... Dude, quarterbacks are not important in fantasy. I'm sorry. They're not. There's Malcolm Brogdon. Psychedelic for the Celtics. Scotty Barnes and Josh Green. RJ Barrett, one of five marble sky-high signatures for the Knicks. Dude, all I know is I won the league here last year, and I had Lamar, who missed the last seven weeks of the year. So the most important time in fantasy, I didn't have my quarterback, and I still won, so... Who's your quarterback? Nobody good, because it was like golf or somebody. It was like golf or picket, or like somebody like that. I picked up off waivers. Ceasar McCallum to 49. Nice one there, Pelicans. I don't remember who it was exactly. Might have been Carr. It was somebody in that tier. Nice and Daniels. Allen Iverson. Redemption is Kenneth Lofton Jr. Aspiring autographs. Green, that's going to the Grizzlies. Nice one there. Memphis is Vin Baker again for the Bucks to 99. Chris Paul, Keegan Murray. That was weird. No parallel in that tag. Huh. Aspiring rookie. Auto shade on sharp again to 99. There you go. Portland is just eviscerating this break. Got no parallel. Odd. Sky High signatures is Stevie Franchise to 99. Steve Francis for the Rockets. Can someone give him something to do? Somebody buy a personal, so he stopped bothering us. Nice and Daniels rookie. Christian Coloco to 25. Pink Aspiring rookie. Auto for the Raptors. Wise men in RJ Bear. That was a weird box. No parallels in that one. Sorry about that everybody. But at least we got all our hits. John Collins to 49. Rookie of Blake Wesley. Darren Fox and Kevin Porter Jr. to 49 for the Rockets. Sky High signatures. KPJ on the astral. It's like four combined honestly. Brogdon to 149 for the seats. That is a Tyus Jones and Deandre Hunter Trey Jones, excuse me. And we've got a Christian Coloco. RPA to 49. Or to 99. Celestial for the Raptors. Hopefully Brian. Nicola Vusevich to 99. Get out of here. Bot voice is Anthony. Jared Jackson. Christian Wood to 99. Kenny Skywalker. Going to the next nice one there in New York. Celestial. Jared Jackson Jr. 149. McCall Bridges and KD. Nice one here to 75. Jabari Smith Jr. On the color graphs to 75. Congrats Rockets. That's on card as well. That is nasty. Congrats Rockets. We'll mag that for you. Again, 20 to go in prism team all. Nice one there. Nice little Jabari Smith Jr. That is Celestial. Jordan Goodwin to 149. To 199. Ty Ty Washington, RPA for the Rockets. Congrats Houston. Jalen Howeadurin on the menagerie for the Pistons. Marjon Bochamp and base. Redemption. Nicola Busevich. Retrospect, autograph, meta. I'm assuming that's going to be between the magic and the bowls. Let me double check really quick. Yeah, bowls and magic. So that'll be a random. That'll be a random right there, unless someone has the magic and bowls. Magic is... Thomas C, bowls, Christopher Alias. So that'll be a random between those two teams.  Gold, spicy, P to 10. Pascal Siakam, base. To 199. Kennedy Chandler, RPA for the Gris. Penny Hardaway for the magic. To 99. Interstellar. Jaden Hardy Rookie, Kevin Porter Jr. Nice one here. To 10. Gold Radiant of... Scotty Barnes. Congrats on that one. Raptors. Max Christie on the psychedelic. Rookie for the Lakers. That is a... Penny Hardaway and Russell Westbrook. Nice one here to 25. Derek Harper on the Meadow Auto. For the Mabs. That's Dallas. There's a little bit of ink on the back there. I'll send an empty box and wrapper with Dallas. Sorry about that. A little bit of ink on the back of that one. Still a nice card. I like seeing some Derek Harper. Malik Beasley Astral to 49. Cameron Thomas and Anthony Simons. Another Jabari Smith Jr. This time to 49. Going to the Rockets. Rockets and Blazers, man. Smoked it this break. Houston again. Tom B. Congrats, Tom. Make sure to get your last initial right this time. I got you, buddy. Celestial Malachi Brannum. For the Spurs. Oshai Gbaji Rookie. Charles Barkley. Sky High Signatures. Io Dasunmu for the Bulls. To 49. What's up, Brad? Julius Randall to 99. Interstellar. Vince Carter, Roy Hachimara. And to 99, Jake LaRavia. Aspiring Rookie Auto. This time tomorrow, the Troy will be Week 1 winners. Oh, man. All right. We've got Elton Brand, Pau Gasol, and Vooch to do randoms for. Let me get that set up. Clippers. Clippers. Sixers. Sixers. Gasol. Riz, please. Riz, please. Bakers. Bakers. Vusevic. Magic. Magic. All right, again, this is in order. All right, there. From top to bottom. All right. We've got the Elton Brand. We're going to do the random four between the Clippers and Sixers. Seven times. One, two, three, four, five, six, and seven. Going to the Clippers. Nice one there. About finding you a job at Fanatics, Anthony. The Pau Gasol between the Grizzlies and Lakers. Six times. One, two, three, four, five, six. Lakers. And then the Nicola Vusevic between the Magic and the Bowls. Oops, not 3D. Reroll. Twice as a reroll. We go six times. One, two, three, four, five, six. Going to the Bowls. All right, quick recap. We had Autos. I already told Rich about you. Vusevic, Gasol, Elton Brand, Jake Luravia, Iowa DeSoon Mood, Derek Harper, Scotty Barnes, Kennedy Chandler, Ty Ty Washington, Kenny Skywalker, Christian Coloco, Kevin Porter Jr., Christian Coloco, Steve Francis, Shade On Sharp, Vin Baker, Kenneth Walton Jr., R.J. Barrett, Kennedy Chandler, Michael Cooper, Malachi Branham, Michael Cooper, Deontay Murray, Clyde Drexler, Trevor Keels, Vin Baker, Musa Diabate, Isaiah Mobley. We had two Jabari Smith Jr. Autos, both on card. One, two, 49, one to 75. Get a gold Allen Iverson to 10, illustrious legends for the Sixers, and then a gold Shade On Sharp RPA seven to 10. That'll do it for the break, guys. Thanks again for the filp. Up next, Legacy.


ve a lot of notes here, but my Neighbor commissioner over here to the right of me is going to keep me on on track here Yeah, the materials and colors I I I don't have anything to say ariam. It's a good job there I think the massing is it was a concern. I don't have a concern about the height as long as you can articulate The buildings. I think You know, I noticed that the the open area that you do have is in front of macy's which On one hand, I like it because the sun can get in there and people like the sun Uh, the downside for me is that's also where the transit area is and I don't know About having to how you mix that but I'll let you guys figure that out Santana row. I don't think we need a Santana row. I really don't I mean we we came we thought about that for years and Capitola, we're going to have the Santana row concept Restaurants along the street where cars are parking and driving Um, it doesn't appeal to me as much as having that open area that's closed off with a Central theme and the waterway in the middle or something like that is more appealing to me. So With that all in my talks and my wife will tell me what I missed later what she wanted me to say. So Any other comments or questions? No um, the next meeting is Uh with the city council next thursday Just following thursday, so you have Uh, for those of you in the audience have more time to Get your information together and go talk to the city council And uh, we look forward to working with you folks in the future. So with that I guess do we need to do a director's report? Do you have anything? I'm no director's report. Just for a second. Oh I wanted to make a point to thank marlon guyer for going through all this trouble and I know this is a The difficult process you've done it before i'm sure but um many times, but I want to I just Personally appreciate you're going through all this and working with us. Thank you very much Okay, uh commissioner comments. I will not be at the special meeting later this month We canceled that meaning right? Yes officially, but you're not going to miss anything. Oh, you canceled it? I didn't cancel it somebody did We'll send out an official notice. Okay. All right with that the meeting's adjourned. Thank you very much