It is now time for oral questions. I recognize the member for Davenport. Thank you Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Yesterday we saw both the Premier and the former Solicitor General, the now Deputy Premier, dodge questions about their summons from the Public Order Emergency Commission. In fact, since the summons was issued, we haven't heard a word from either the Premier or the former Solicitor General. Hiding the problem does not make it go away, Mr. Speaker. I ask the Premier, will he come clean and commit today to speaking with the Commission? Well, Mr. Speaker, this is a federal inquiry into the federal government's use of the Federal Emergencies Act. From day one, Mr. Speaker, for Ontario, this was a policing matter. It was not a political matter. And the opposition knows, Mr. Speaker, politicians don't direct the police. Top officials from the OPP that were running the operation in conjunction with the municipal police agencies and the RCMP are testifying at the committee. Again, Mr. Speaker, this is a federal inquiry into the federal government's decision to use the Federal Emergencies Act. I'd like to hear the word federal one more time, Speaker. During... Back to the Premier. Stop the clock. Stop the clock. The House will come to order. We've got 58 minutes and 26 seconds to go. We're just getting started. It's the second date. I have to be able to hear the member that has the floor. Start the clock. Supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker. Back to the Premier. During former Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson's testimony to the Commission last week, and in his conversations with the Prime Minister in February, the Prime Minister told Mayor Watson that the Premier was, and I quote, hiding from his responsibility for, yes, political reasons. Speaker, the Premier was hiding then when he let convoy organizers occupy Ottawa and harass residents, and he is hiding now by not testifying at the Commission. He cannot hide forever. Will the Premier finally do the right thing, go to Ottawa and testify before the Commission? Speaker, I think the Premier has been very clear. This is obviously a federal inquire into the federal government's decision to invoke the Federal Emergencies Act. Now, I know the member opposite doesn't want to, doesn't appreciate that, Mr. Speaker, but that is the case. At the same time, we have been assisting the Commission by ensuring that cabinet documents have been provided to the Commission, and by also ensuring that both the Deputy Minister of Transportation and the Deputy Solicitor General are made available to the Commission to assist them as they investigate the federal government's invocation of the Emergencies Act. Mr. Speaker, back to the Premier. The Commission summoned the Premier and the former Solicitor General because the people of Ottawa and Windsor and everybody else in this province deserve answers and they deserve accountability from this government. Instead, this Premier is choosing to hide behind parliamentary privilege, parliamentary privilege? That's baloney and everybody in this room knows it. He failed Ontarians... I'm going to caution the member on her language. Yeah. Caution the member on her language and recognize her to continue with her question. Thank you. All right. Yes. This Premier, and this Premier knows it, failed Ontarians during the convoy and is failing us now. The former Ottawa mayor testified. Order. The Prime Minister is going to testify and so is the Mayor of Windsor. Other political leaders, Mr. Speaker, aren't afraid to talk to this Commission. Why is this Premier shaken in his boots? And to reply, the government host leader. Again, Mr. Speaker, because it is a federal inquiry into the federal government's use of the Federal Emergencies Act, Mr. Speaker, at the same time, we are assisting the Commission in its work by ensuring that Cabinet documents are provided to the Commission, by ensuring that the Deputy Solicitor General, the Deputy Minister of Transportation are made available to the Commission for testimony, Mr. Speaker. Also, obviously, the Commissioner of the OPP will be testifying, Mr. Speaker. The member herself shows exactly why this is political and, Mr. Speaker, it shouldn't be. It is a policing matter. We are ensuring that consistently throughout the testimony so far, and that is why we are assisting the Commission in its work. As I said, that Cabinet documents are made available, that the Deputy Solicitor General has been made available, the Deputy Minister of Transportation, Mr. Speaker, and we'll continue to provide that assistance as required. The next question, the member for Ottawa Extension. Why, thank you, Speaker. Thank you very much. That question is to the Premier. The next question I'm about to ask. Speaker, friends, I wonder if you could clear something up. Is the Mayor of Windsor a police officer? Yes or no? Is the Prime Minister of Canada a police officer? Yes or no? So could somebody please explain to the people of Ottawa Centre why these officials saw fit to answer the call to testify before a Commission, but this Premier and the Minister responsible, lawyers representing this Government told the Federal Court yesterday that irreparable harm will be caused if this Premier and that Minister testify before the Commission. Could the Premier tell us today, Speaker, what irreparable harm are you talking about? Again, Mr. Speaker, they may change the person asking the question, but the facts still remain the same. The Federal Government made a decision to invoke the Federal Emergencies Act. By the status of that legislation, the Federal Government has to convene a Commission of Inquiry about their use of the Federal Emergencies Act. We are assisting the Commission, Mr. Speaker, as you would expect by ensuring that the Deputy Minister of Transportation, the Deputy Solicitor General are made available to the Commission. We know that the OPP Commissioner will also be testifying and at the same time, Cabinet documents with respect to that time period have been turned over to the Commission. We will continue to assist the Commission with the Federal Emergencies Act. The supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker. You didn't get to answer my question. I really hope the Premier will rise in his place and answer the people of Ottawa Centre today, Speaker, because we deserve it. The question here is, what irreparable harm is this Premier and his lawyers talking about? Because I want to talk about actual irreparable harm. I want to talk about a government that sat in its hands for three weeks while chaos reigned in our city, while residents choked on diesel fumes, while hate groups ran amok with impunity in our city. And I want to talk about a government that took three weeks for them to tow and find 39 vehicles, and then they gave those vehicles back to those truck owners without a single fine, despite the fact that this Premier promised $100,000 fines. Small businesses like the Ottawa Bike Cafe, Speaker, suffered terribly on Spark Street, and they are right now, as I say these words, teetering on bankruptcy. I want to talk about an irreparable harm caused to the people of Ottawa Centre. What are the fake excuses this government is hiding behind today? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Obviously, a tremendous amount of resources were provided to the City of Ottawa and continue to be, but the current Commission of Inquiry is specific to the federal government's use of the Federal Emergencies Act, and by the terms of that legislation, of course, the federal government had to invoke this Commission of Inquiry. I would like to thank Mr. Speaker and its work by ensuring that the Deputy Minister of Transportation is made available to the Commission, by ensuring that the Deputy Solicitor General is made available to the Commission. At the same time, certain cabinet documents have been requested. We're assisting the Commission by providing those documents to them, Mr. Speaker. So we'll continue to work with and assist the Commission as it does its work. Thank you. The final supplement. We want to thank the City of Ottawa and the City of Ottawa Council Leader who won't take responsibility to face the music when that leader himself won't take a short drive up to Ottawa to face the music himself despite repeated requests from a Commission Speaker that he has fact denied that he received them. We know he got them. So we know for a fact that the Commission has made clear as several pieces of evidence that the province chose not to get involved of Ontario. And after what people back home have been through, this Premier and that Minister owe it to us to come to Ottawa and testify. So here's an offer, Speaker, through you to the government. I've got a nice little hybrid vehicle here, Speaker. I leave on Thursday to go back to Ottawa. Do you need a drive, Premier? Do you need a drive, Minister? I'll take you there myself. The ride is a serious offer. I'll make the comments through the chair. Order. Order. Response. Government House Leader. And again, we are continuing to assist the Commission of Inquiry into the federal government's use of the Federal Emergency Act. We provided cabinet documents as requested. We of course have made the Deputy Minister of Transportation available. We've made the Deputy Solicitor General available as they do their work and as well as the Commissioner of the OPP, Mr. Speaker. At the same time, I'm heartened to know that the member opposite has a green vehicle. He's very lucky because of all of the work that the Minister of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade has been doing to ensure that green vehicles are the future in the province of Ontario. And because of the work of the Minister of Energy, we can now charge up those green vehicles on the on ramps, on the on ramps between Ottawa and New England. We couldn't do that before because they didn't exist, Mr. Speaker. So a congratulations to the member opposite. We'll continue to work on behalf of the people of the province of Ontario, but really specifically to the Commission. We'll continue to assist them because it's important that we do so. Thank you. And to the government House Leader, there was absolutely nothing funny about what happened in Ottawa or in Windsor. So I suggest that you stop making light of the situation and cracking jokes. My question is to the Premier. The Federal Public Order Emergency Commission is requested to interview the Premier and Minister Jones regarding the use of the Federal Emergencies Act. In my writing, the Ambassador Bridge, North America's largest international crossing was completely blocked by convoy supporters. Billions of dollars of goods was enabled to cross into Canada or the United States, which caused auto and manufacturing plants to close and thousands of workers were laid off. Cross border workers, including nurses, were unable to access their jobs. Many small businesses in the area were forced to close and lost significant business due to the disruption. The people in my writing deserve complete transparency from this government. Just the other day, the Premier said he stands shoulder to shoulder with the Prime Minister in support of using the Emergency Act. Why doesn't he stand shoulder to shoulder with the shoulder to shoulder with them at the Commission and actually answer their questions? Let's continue to refuse to appear at the Federal Commission. Remind members to make a response to Government House Leader. I guess that question in itself highlights why the NDP is trying to turn this into something that is political. What we're trying to do and what the Commission is trying to do is get to the bottom of the fact of whether the Emergencies Act was required. It is by law the Federal Government has to invoke this Commission of Inquiry, Mr. Speaker. Now they have asked us for certain documents, cabinet documents, and we're assisting the Commission ensuring that that happens. It is a policing matter, as the Premier has said, Mr. Speaker. It shouldn't be a political matter like the opposition is trying to make it. That is why we've offered and ensuring that the Deputy Minister of Transportation is available to ask the questions, as the Member has highlighted, the Member for Ottawa Centre have highlighted. We're also making the Deputy Solicitor General available, Mr. Speaker. We'll continue to assist the Commission as it does its work to investigate the Federal Government's use of the Federal Emergencies Act, Mr. Speaker. What that response shows is government and this Premier's will to completely abdicate responsibility for the decisions that they did or didn't make while the crisis was happening in Windsor and Ottawa. For six days, my community was in crisis due to the blockade at the Ambassador Bridge. Residents in Sandwich Town were unable to access other parts of our city. Some were afraid to even leave their homes. Truck drivers trying to move goods back and forth across the border were stuck on the road for days without food or access to washrooms. The impact lasted far beyond the blockade, Speaker. The Premier and former Solicitor General are dodging requests to be interviewed by the Commission and are committed to fighting a summons to appear. Speaker, the Premier has long said that the buck stops with him and yet he won't appear at the Commission to answer questions about his decisions. What is Premier Ford and Minister Jones hiding and why won't they testify to ensure that something like this never again happens in my community or in Ottawa or in Fort Erie or anywhere else in this province? I suspect some of the elements of the member's question is exactly why there is a federal inquiry into the federal government's use of the Federal Emergencies Act. That is why of course that we are assisting the Commission in its work by ensuring that the Deputy Minister of Transportation is available, that the Deputy Solicitor General is available and by ensuring that cabinet documents relevant to the Commission's inquiry are also made available. Continue to assist the Commission of Inquiry as it does its work in assessing whether the federal government's invocation of the Federal Emergencies Act was required at the time. Thank you, Mr Speaker. Thank you. The next question, the member for Mississauga Centre. Thank you so much, Speaker. Good morning. My question is for the Associate Minister of Housing. Speaker, as you know, Ontario's housing supply is in crisis. Skyrocketing demands has far outpaced the construction of new supply, making the Canadian dream of home ownership far out of reach for many Ontarians. And with Ontario's population projected to grow by millions in the coming years, the demand will only increase. Many of my constituents in Mississauga Centre, from hardworking young professionals to young families, students, new Ontarians and seniors, are looking to downsize and are finding themselves priced out of the market and unable to find housing options that meet their needs. Speaker, can the minister elaborate on what steps our government's newly proposed housing supply action plan will take to ensure that our province is able to achieve our goal of building 1.5 million homes over the next 10 years? Great. Thank you very much, Speaker, and I want to thank the hardworking member from Mississauga Centre for that very important question. Speaker, we know that the status quo is simply not working. If we continue on this path without making bold and transformative changes, the next generation will not have the same opportunities for success as previous generations have. The proposed legislation, Mr Speaker, will take several steps to make sure Ontarians get the additional housing supply we so critically need, Speaker, by permitting more gentle intensification, an issue that opposition has on many times said transcends party lines. Our proposed changes will lay the foundation to more missing middle housing, giving Ontarians more choice and flexibility. Additionally, Speaker, we're reducing building costs to incentivise our private sector and non-profit partners to get more housing built faster. Speaker, together with all hands on deck, we can ensure that home ownership is attainable for all Ontarians in across our great province. The supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker, and I thank the Minister for that response, and I also thank him for recently visiting Mississauga and sitting down with stakeholders on this topic. Speaker, as the Minister mentioned, the proposed changes will make alterations to current municipal fees levied on new developments and construction of new housing units across the province. I understand that for every month that approvals are delayed. It can add anywhere from $2,600 to $3,300 onto the cost of building a single family home or condominium unit in the greater Toronto area, including in Mississauga. Furthermore, many municipalities have increased fees, which are ultimately passed on onto the new home buyer. Speaker, can the Minister let us know how this legislation will address this very problem? Thank you, Speaker, and again, I want to thank my Honourable colleague for that follow-up question. Speaker, at a time when Ontarians are facing a rising cost of living, we recognise the need to keep costs down for all Ontarians, Mr Speaker. It's concerning trend to see municipal fees and charges levied on new and affordable housing skyrocket by up to 36%, Mr Speaker, without considering the impact fee increases have upon tenants and future homeowners, housing prices will rise and affordably will worsen. Our proposal, if passed, will reduce the cost of residential development by freezing, reducing and slowing future growth of municipal charges. Speaker, as I've said before, our government will not shy away from bold and decisive action under the leadership of this Premier to streamline municipal approval processes and reduce costs for Ontarians entering the housing market. Mr Speaker, like we said, time and time again, the previous government let down the people of this province, we will not. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. In 2017, the Premier of the province was asked to testify at a very high-profile inquiry in Sudbury. Premier Nguyen could have invoked parliamentary privilege to avoid testifying, but she did not. And I will quote what she said, I will testify, I will go along with the process and do what I can to clarify. Premier's have waived privilege before. Why won't Premier Ford? Well, Speaker, I think in the member's example, the former Premier herself was the subject of the inquiry. Right? So it is certainly a big difference, but having said that, Mr Speaker, having said that, we, of course, are going to continue to work with the commission. We have provided cabinet documents for the commission, as has been required. We can continue to assist them by ensuring that not only the commissioner of the OPP, but the deputy solicitor general are made available to the commission, the deputy minister of transportation are made available. Look, the difference again is that this is a federal commission of inquiry into the federal government's decision to invoke the Federal Emergencies Act for the first time. Mr Speaker, so as you would expect, the federal federal government has asked for, the commission has asked for assistance in that, and we are providing that assistance in the capacity that I've mentioned on numerous occasions in the House. And a supplementary question. Speaker, 20 years ago, Premier Harris also didn't shy away from an inquiry. He had no problem speaking to the Walkerton inquiry, and I quote, as head of government, I'm accountable. Speaker to the Premier, why won't he follow the lead of Premier Harris? Be accountable. Testify before the commission tell his story. Again, Mr Speaker, the member is highlighting a provincial inquiry into a provincial matter. One would expect that when the provincial government has an inquiry that those people who need to be called are actually brought forward, Mr Speaker, but in this instance the member himself is highlighting exactly why the Prime Minister would be in front of that commission of inquiry and why, in this instance, they are asking us for assistance, and that assistance is by ensuring that the Deputy Solicitor General, the Deputy Minister of Transportation, that any relevant cabinet documents during that time period are made available. We are assisting the commission by ensuring that that that happens. The Commissioner of the OPP is there, Speaker, but at the same time, as the member has said, and I'd ask him maybe to reread his question because it might better clarify for him that this is a federal inquiry into a federal act. Response, Mr Speaker, and having said that, we will continue to assist as required because I think it's the right thing to do. Thank you. The next question, the member for Mississauga Lakeshore. Thank you, Mr Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Economic Development and Job Creation and Trade. Earlier this month, the Minister was in Germany and Austria to continue meeting with and attracting investment in the automotive and EV sector. As being someone myself that worked in the auto industry for 31 years at Ford, we could all agree that Ontario should continue to focus on its manufacturing capability and ensure that there are plenty of jobs for families across the province. Speaker, will the minister provide us with an update on his recent trade mission to Germany and Austria? Trade and job creation. Speaker, the mission to Germany and Austria was an opportunity to build on the 16 billion in transformative EV and auto investments that were brought to Ontario in the last 22 months. With all of the turmoil surrounding Europe, these countries are feeling increased pressures on their supply chain. This is what we heard from them. Their dependence on materials from Russia and China have caused them to rethink about hitting a reset button. They now know that Ontario has everything they need. We have the critical minerals. We have the refining capability necessary to make EV batteries and all of the components. And as the number two auto jurisdiction in all of North America, they know that we have a proven ecosystem of reliable partners. We have the skilled trade, 65,000 annual stem grabs, public health care, 94% clean energy, something they're not going to find in the US. Our message was clear. If you're any EVs, you need to be in Ontario. That's a supplementary question. It sounds like the trade mission to Germany and Austria came at a critical time for Ontario's economy. The future of transportation is shifting towards electrification and with this comes a renewed focus on clean electricity. The minister is right. Ontario must continue to promote itself as a great place to do business. Speaker, will the minister shed some light on how Germany and Austria feel about investing in Ontario and what they see our competitive edge here in Ontario? Companies worldwide are looking for stable, reliable, trusted jurisdictions. They want ethically sourced materials and products made using clean energy. We showed the companies that EVs and batteries made in Ontario are assembled with 94% clean energy. They now know we invested half a billion dollars in DeFasco to convert their coal-fired ovens to electric arc furnaces, so the steel in our cars is green. Our minerals are brought out of the ground and refined under the safest and most modern method on earth. But Speaker, we then outlined how EVs and batteries that are made in the U.S. are not green. They are made by burning coal. When you buy an EV, you expect the vehicle to be a green vehicle with a green battery and green steel, so our message was very, very simple. You need to make your EV products in Ontario, and we're here and open for business. Speaker, my question is to the Minister for Municipal Affairs and Housing. I'm joined today by Susan DeRosa, a tenant whose purpose-built rental is set to be demolished and replaced by a condo. I have been working with Susan and her neighbors at 145 Cent George to ensure that if the city approves the development, she and her friends and her neighbors still get the right to return to their home at the same rent once the condo is complete. But this government is looking at scrapping the rules that gives tenants the right to return to their home at an affordable price, which threatens thousands of affordable private-market rental units across our city. Minister, can you ensure that renters who are evicted can return to their rent-controlled apartment once the building is complete? Well, Speaker, first of all, I want to thank the member for University Rosedale. I saw her on CP24 this morning praising our government for Build 23. I look forward to her party and the other opposition members who asked us to put many of these measures into the bill. I look forward to them supporting Build 23 as we move forward. But in debate this morning, both her and the opposition house leader mentioned this consultation that the government is doing on the rent replacement by-laws that are in a very few select communities in Ontario. I'm just wondering about the motive of the question, is this setting up the opposition for voting against a bill? Many times the members opposite have presented suggestions on increasing Ontario's housing supply. And a lot of those suggestions are incorporated in Build 23. We think it's a bill that everyone in this chamber can support because desperately we need more rental housing stock. Minister, we need to build more housing supply and more rental stock. I apologize to the member for University of Rosedale for having to interrupt. I have to be able to hear the member start the clock. The member could continue. We need to build more housing but not at the expense of- Government side will come to order. The opposition will come to order. If it happens again I'll start calling out the members by name. Start the clock. The member can continue. We need to build more homes but not at the expense of the affordable rental homes we already have. My question is back to the Minister for Municipal Affairs and Housing. This Government wants to reduce an exempt development fees for some homes. These fees pay for transit, for daycares, for parks and for the services that residents need. They also help build new affordable housing. Toronto is already experiencing a funding shortfall of more than $800 million. What is this Government's plan to help municipalities make up for this massive loss in funding? First Speaker, I want to deal with her first question again. We are launching consultations to determine how to protect our supply of housing and I want to make sure for the people that are in the gallery. It's important to keep in mind that the proposed amendments would not impact renter protections or requirements under the Residential Tenancies Act. Our Government has made changes to the RTA to better protect tenants, to stop rent evictions, to avoid evictions. I just wish the opposition would have supported it. On the issue of the charges, we have to get those baseline costs down so that we have more affordable housing and more attainable housing. But even in our own financial information returns, it shows that municipalities have $8 billion in their DC reserves, including $2.25 billion in the City of Toronto. We're going to continue to work with our municipal partners. We're also going to work with the federal government on their $4 billion housing accelerating fund. We think that would help municipalities as well. This month, Ontarians told us that the health care system was in crisis, but the Premier and Minister of Health were nowhere to be found for six weeks. Then in August, the CEO of Ontario Health went on record admitting that the health care system was under tremendous strain. Despite this, we kept hearing from the government that patients were getting care in the time that they needed, even though they weren't. Because this month, I discovered leaked Ontario Health data revealing that for the month of August, year wait times, lengths of stay, ambulance offload times and time to inpatient bed were the worst that they have ever been going all the way back to 2008. The health care system took a nose dive in the last 12 months alone. Yesterday, the member for Eglinton Lawrence quoted Dr. Ronald Cohn to justify her position that our health care system has adequate capacity. Yet Dr. Cohn's quote was incomplete. In the same article she referenced, he conceded that face with mounting patient volumes, quote, I am worried about how more we can do. Will the Minister of Health explain why in each of these examples the government's position has disagreed with the position of their own sources? And to reply on behalf of the government, the member for Eglinton Lawrence and Parliamentary Assistant Minister of Health. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, and thank you to the member opposite for the question. Frankly, Mr. Speaker, the source that he's referencing, Dr. Cohn said exactly what I quoted that where the resources would be there for critically ill patients if they needed them at Sick Children's Hospital. I don't know if he wants to challenge me on my reading comprehension, but I think it's pretty good. And really many of the pressures facing our health care system are not new. And none of them are unique to Ontario. That's why we passed our plan to stay open in preparation for a likely winter surge and have been taking all kinds of actions to make sure that we are prepared. For example, we have a plan which has a five-point strategy to further bolster Ontario health care workforce, expand innovative models of care, and ensure hospital beds are there for patients when they need them. And the plan outlines what Ontarians can expect response which we think is better health care as we build a better health care system. That's what this government is going to do. Mr Speaker, I was merely pointing out that the member across didn't read the whole quote and the plan that she references a plan to stay open is the most unambitiously titled plan I think in history. It's a plan to stay open. It's not a plan to deliver great patient care. It's a plan to merely stay open and it's already failing on that mandate. Anyways, I'd like to expand on the Ontario health data I revealed on October 12th which for the first time revealed the incredibly bleak and deteriorating state of our health care system. The people of Ontario usually get weekly updates from the medical officer of health. They used to have transparent access to the Ontario science table and now the only way to get real data portraying our health care system is to get leaked information from the courage of people who are willing to share documents. I'm hearing now from health care workers that there is deafening silence from the Ministry of Health and also that this weekend there were multiple GTA emergency departments on redirect because they were full. Will the Minister of Health or her designate explain why this government refuses to be accountable to the people of Ontario about the state of our health care system? To reply, the Premier. Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. I find it really rich coming from the Liberals that destroyed the health care system, created hallway health care. They fired nurses shot down the health care system, reduced the funding. What we're doing, we're hiring more nurses, Mr. Speaker. Over 12,800 nurses as they were firing thousands of nurses. We're building new hospitals as they were closing hospitals, Mr. Speaker. We're going to continue increasing the funding in health care ending hallway health care that they created for decades and we're hiring more doctors, more nurses, creating a university a medical school university as they never created even one spot into the medical universities. They actually took spots of way, Mr. Speaker. Member for Mississauga Centre. Speaker, my question is the Minister of Labor, Immigration, Training and Skills Development. Speaker, Russia's egregious actions and invasion of Ukraine have forced thousands of Ukrainian citizens to leave their homeland. These families, women, children and seniors are being separated because of Russia's unprovoked violence and many of them are trying to find safe refuge here in Canada the best country in the world. Mississauga is home to over 30,000 Ukrainian Canadians and many institutions like St. Mary's Ukrainian Catholic Church, the Ukrainian Canadian Congress and St. Sophia School and we are proud to welcome several dozens of new families every week. Speaker, my thoughts and prayers are with everyone who has been affected by Russia's abhorrent invasion of Ukraine especially the children whose childhoods have been affected forever. Question? Speaker, my question to the Minister is what is our government doing to assist these moms and dads, young people, seniors and families settle here in Ontario? Mr. Labor, Immigration, Training and Skills Development. Thank you very much Mr. Speaker and I want to thank the member for Mississauga Centre for that question but most importantly what you're doing to welcome Ukrainians out here in Ontario. Thank you. Mr. Speaker, our government under the leadership of Premier Ford stands with Ukraine against Putin's aggression. Across government we are working with employers, labour unions, faith organisations and community groups to do everything we can to help the people of Ukraine. For those seeking refuge in Ontario we're prioritising their immigration applications. We have also expanded Better Jobs Ontario to provide up to $28,000 for Ukrainians who want to train for a new career here in Ontario and our dedicated jobs helpline has now helped more than 1,000 Ukrainians get the support they need to find meaningful employment. Mr.  Speaker, Ukrainians coming to our province to escape Russia's aggression need to know that we are making every effort possible to ensure that they can settle here and continue their lives with dignity and means to provide for their families. These are individuals and families who are facing challenges and adversity that few of us could ever imagine. In times of hardship and strife it is important that the world knows that the Ontario spirit of hospitality and support never wavers for those in need. Speaker, once again, my question to the Minister of Labor, Immigration, Training and Skills Development, what is our government doing to make sure that the many local organizations across Ontario that have been hard at work have the resources they need to effectively and efficiently aid Ukrainian newcomers? Mr. Speaker, thank you and thanks again to the member for that question. Mr. Speaker, last week I visited Jewish immigrant aid services in North York with my caucus colleague, the member for Thornhill. We got to see their efforts firsthand and learn more about the incredible work that they're doing to help Ukrainian refugees. Our government is proud to be sporting this agency and 13 other local organizations with $3 million in additional funding towards settlement, housing, employment services and mental health resources. These resources build on the $900,000 we provided the Canadian-Ukrainian immigrant aid society earlier this year. Our government, under the leadership of Premier Ford, is committed to making sure that Ukrainians coming here to Ontario can settle and feel at home as quickly as possible. Good morning, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. MPPs across the province have been hearing from constituents about the unmitigated crisis in our hospitals. But our Conservative MPPs truly listening? My constituent colleague told me about her mother's ER experience, and I quote, my brilliant, independent, selfless, always helping others' mom had to hope and pray for someone to walk down that hall to attempt to get help. Her oxygen machine was empty. When Colleen brought this to the hospital's attention, the nurses' overwhelmed exhaustion was clear. It wasn't their fault, Speaker. Will this government keep blaming others, keep neglecting public health care, or fund it properly and pay nurses what they're worth? Right on. Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. And after decades of underfunding, it is this government that has made unprecedented investments in our health care system. As I said yesterday, health care funding has increased a record 6.2% year over year, the largest increase on record, including an over $5 billion increase in base funding, which is an 8.9% increase. A lot of these investments are because we've just gone through a very difficult time for the health care system. As everybody knows, the pandemic has been happening for two years. And that is why we passed a plan to stay open because you want to stay open. The pandemic had shut everybody down for a while and we want to make sure we stay open. And that plan has five important initiatives to once fully implemented, help our health care system get back on track. We've added up to 6,000 more health care workers after that plan is instituted, but you know we've already added 11,700 health care workers since the pandemic began. But our plan also frees up over 2,500 new hospital beds and expands models of care. We're going to continue working for the people of Ontario in finding solutions to make our health care system better. Speaker, I guess part of my question was answered. They will continue to blame others. Look, this conservative party is the party of furniture, whereas we are the party with the NDP of the front lines. They're the party of health care profiteers, whereas we're the party of the working people. For years, the Liberal Party cut and underfunded the way for hallway medicine. It's only degraded further since this conservative government started their callous evisceration of our public health care system. They have not fixed it. It's gotten worse. Just last week, LHSC in London posted a 20-hour delay for the RER and asked patients to bring a snack in activities. My constituent Tina told me about searching in vain for a nurse or doctor after her partners or odds of major surgery. No doctors were available and nurses were run off their feet. Tina waited for days until she finally got a phone call. The RNNO surveyed nurses and found that 69% are planning on leaving the profession in the next five years. When will this government admit they've created a crisis and spend money on frontline health care heroes? Right on. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, and thank you again to Member Opposite for the question. This government has made record investments in all of our health human resources and we've been doing it since the pandemic began because we want to make sure that we have health human resources. We have hired already since March 2020 11,700 new health care providers. Nurses of Ontario said the other day that they have registered more new nurses this year already with two months left to go than ever before. 12,802 nurses are to make sure that Ontarians get the care that they deserve and we are going to keep working on these things because we have long said the status quo is not working. That's why we're making changes and we ask the members Opposite to stop opposing all of the solutions we're putting forward help us to fix the health care system for generally. Thank you. The next question, the member for Hastings, Lenox and Addings. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Colleges and Universities. Speaker, all Ontarians should feel proud of the great history of medical and science research from our post secondary institutions that has saved lives and changed the world. Just one example, we only have to look across the street to the University of Toronto to see the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre which is Canada's leading centre for innovation in diabetes research, education and clinical care. My own personal experience of having spent 25 years at St. Lawrence College in Kingston. I'm very aware of the wonderful research being done at that institution. To this day, we know of the positive role that our colleges and universities hospital research institutions continue to play when it comes to innovations and progress in our health care system. Speaker, can the Minister of Colleges and Universities please inform the House on what is being done currently by our government to support these investments. Thank you Mr. Speaker and thank you to the member from Hastings, Lenox and Addington for that important question. This government understands that investments in college and university hospital research not only strengthens Ontario's existing innovation and commercialisation capacity but also grows our province's professional and skilled workforce and positions us as a global leader. Our government is supporting research and innovation that leads to the discoveries and advancements that make a real impact in people's lives. Ontario will be supporting innovation with an investment of more than $198 million in research projects at colleges, universities and research hospitals across the province. This funding will support 241 research projects across this province and these projects will be integral in building, renovating and equipping research facilities with upgraded technology and supporting research to attract new research talent. We will continue our commitment and efforts in strengthening Ontario's college and university's hospital research initiatives that provide college and university hospitals with the ability to adopt advanced technologies to remain competitive and move Ontario forward. Thank you Mr. Speaker. Even before the COVID-19 outbreak it was imperative that our government showed leadership to address the shortfalls of the previous government when it came to investing in our research and innovation sector. Our government has worked towards ensuring that the province's most vulnerable people received the care that they need. So working with so many stakeholders our government has often talked about the investments in hospitals and strengthening our province's public health sectors. Speaker can the minister of colleges and universities elaborate further about the initiatives that our government has invested to support a more robust health sector. Well thank you once again to the member for raising this important issue. Ontario has incredible researcher potential and we are working to realize this potential through investments in important research organizations like the Ontario Health Data Platform Intellectual Property Committee. Speaker through groups such as this one we are ensuring that researchers are able to access invaluable sorry de-identified data to support the work of our health care sector. This government is proud to stand behind investments like this one and will continue to work with all post-secondary institutions and research organizations across the province to ensure we continue to increase Ontario's research and innovation capabilities to help build health care capacity and create more jobs opportunity and growth for our economy. It's also exciting to look across the other corner to see the new U of T Biomedical Research Centre and stay tuned for more. Thank you Speaker my question is to the premier the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities States person-centered care secure housing of choice for life and participation in community life are human rights for people with disabilities but for Jonathan a constituent of mine with developmental disabilities he's been deprived of each of these as he's been warehoused in a hospital for over a year speaker. The very basics he deserves as a human being like a hug from his mother or simply having his nails clipped have been kept out of reach from him. Meanwhile the weight for the support of housing he needs in community is up to 40 years long speaker. My question to the premier can the government explain the choice to deprive Jonathan of his fundamental human rights and can the government explain why the premier has not responded to Janet Abramson who's sitting in the gallery who is Jonathan's mother for over a year now she's been asking the premier for five minutes on a phone call and they will not respond. Question can the government explain why Jonathan is being left behind in hospitals? Why is he being left behind? He needs the support of housing today. Thank you. The children community and social services. Thank you speaker and thank you very much for the question. You know when we took office we saw that adults with developmental disabilities and their service providers were continuing to face many of the same problems over many many years and it was our government that developed journey to belonging. It's about including people in the community. It's about creating a place for them to live where they can achieve the life that they want to live. It is about inclusion. It is about belonging and those are powerful words. That was in May 2021 and we had started that work when we began as a government and we consulted with various groups across the province. Between November and December 2020 we held eight virtual sessions with over 190 participants including individuals with lived experience family members and service providers. We also received nearly 900 written submissions. We're making both immediate and long-term improvements to developmental services in Ontario. We want people to be able to live in their communities where they belong to belong and have a life of meaning and purpose and we're going to continue to. Thank you. Thank you and Janet is in the gallery. Will the minister and the premier look at Janet? Look at her. She's a person. My question is back to the premier. Report after report shows that investment in an independent living doesn't just respect Jonathan's human rights. It is far more cost efficient. Without it people with developmental disabilities end up in hospitals or long-term care where their care is compromised because of this government's cuts. This is why we the official opposition prioritized the building of 60,000 supportive housing units in Ontario because it's an investment that is fiscally responsible and also ethical. My question is back to the premier. This government talks a big game on being fiscally responsible. Will you turn your words into action? Will you house Jonathan? Will the government create independent living for tens of thousands of people with developmental disabilities who deserve to live their best life? And will you give her five minutes on the phone? Your staff said you were too busy. She's right there. Look at her. Thank you. Thank you and remind members to make the comments to the chair. To reply on behalf of the government the minister of municipal affairs and housing. Speaker, you know through you to the member for Toronto Saint Paul's I appreciate her passion on this issue. It just seems that it just seems that I'm glad she's she's talking about housing supply. You know during debate in one of our previous housing supply action plan the member for Toronto Saint Paul stated actually in this house the statement that more houses is not necessarily the answer. So I'm glad that that we can we can look forward. In fact, the member for Toronto Rosdale said last week that she wanted to see a comprehensive plan. This is exactly order forward. We've put forward a order. The member for Toronto Saint Paul has come to order housing opportunities for Jonathan and other individuals in the province of Ontario. We're going to continue to build more to support more and to ensure that everyone has a safe secure place to call home. Order. The next question, the member for Kitchen and Connoisseur. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. As we all know, the last two years have proven to be very challenging for many parents and students. The recent EQ AO data shows that most Ontario students like students all across Canada are struggling with math. I've also heard from many parents who say their young children's reading skills are not progressing as they should, Mr. Speaker. After the pandemic and with union German strikes, it's fair to say that we cannot take children out of class. We now have an opportunity to help Ontario students recover. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Education. What is being done to help our children recover from these learning losses? Mr. Education. Thank you, Speaker. I want to thank the member for Kitchen, Connoisseur for his question as a parents and advocate to making sure children remain in school. Mr. Speaker, we are investing more in our students in our schools and in our parents because we know part of Ontario's plan to catch up the first pillar is keeping kids in class and that's why, Speaker, we've expanded support because we recognize learning loss is a challenge across this nation and the world. It's why we've expanded tutoring $175 million, the largest tutoring program, the only one of its kind in this country to allow small group interventions with the focus on reading, writing and math. For the first time next September, we're going to have a new screening program for kindergarten, grade one and grade two kids so that we understand their literacy capabilities and we help to get them back on track. Mr. Speaker, we also have a new math curriculum finally eliminating the former liberal government's discovery math curriculum with a modern skills focus emphasis on life in job skills, coding and financial and digital literacy critical for the jobs of tomorrow. Mr. Speaker, in addition, we've expanded tutoring virtually and online and we also recognize for new educators in this province we feel so strongly we're taking this case in the courts that a new educator in Ontario should be able to have a basic grade nine math standard. This is the plan to get kids back on track and start speaker with keeping kids in school. That's a question. Well, thank you very much Mr. Speaker. And with that said there are still many families in my riding like the Stevens family who are experiencing financial hardship due to soaring inflation Mr. Speaker hardworking parents across this province are struggling with the stress of day to day costs on top of supporting their kids' education with the tools and supports that they need for success. These are unpredictable economic times marked by increased costs that are across the board and parents now more than ever can use financial relief that will ease the costs associated with their children's learning recovery Mr. Speaker. Parents need flexibility so that they can best spend those dollars to help their kids catch up. So speaker on behalf of hardworking parents in my riding can the minister inform this house on what our government plans to do for the parents that are in financial need. Mr. Speaker thank you speaker we do recognize as progressive conservatives that there is great instability in the global economy and there's a real impact to the cost of living for the families we all represent it's why we believe for the fourth time we should be providing direct financial support to the parents of this province again we're providing a catch of payment $200 for every child up to age 18 and $250 for every school age child up to age 21 with special education needs to date there's over 850,000 applications we just opened the website just a few days ago it shows and it underscores the need in this province and country for financial relief in addition speaker it was our government premier that cut the gas tax by 10 cents our government that reduced taxes for the lowest income Canadians to lift tax credit it was our government that provided a child care deal that were providing literal 50% reduction by Christmas of this year $6,000 in the bank these are meaningful ways we can support families support children and our economy through the sensibility here at home and around the world my question is to the premier street outreach services known as SOS provides a critical service to vulnerable people in Thunder Bay for those experiencing homelessness the SOS van provides a warm space meals transportation to shelters and has literally saved lives these last two winters unfortunately Thunder Bay's shelter house has announced that it must permanently close its SOS service because it hasn't been able to secure funding will this government step forward and supply the funding needed to keep people alive this winter in Thunder Bay for spots minister miss bullfairs and houses thank you so much and I want to thank the honorable member for that that comment I was just in Thunder Bay with my parliamentary assistant MPP Holland met with many stakeholders and we had a fantastic announcement with the Matawa First Nation fantastic project to build more homes in that in that area so it was a was a great day I appreciate the fact that the honorable member is bringing forward the the the shelter challenges we've been very open with the DSAB in Thunder Bay we've provided significant amount of dollars under the social services relief fund to support the shelter and to support the vulnerable populations we'll continue to work with the DSAB as we move forward my understanding is they haven't allocated their fifth phase of the social services relief fund we'll continue to work with them on homelessness programs in in Thunder Bay and appreciate the member bringing the matter forward supplementary question thank you the Harris conservative government downloaded many social service responsibilities order I'll already overburden municipalities and this government is at the helm of a collapsing social safety net in Thunder Bay SOS is actually one of three key outreach services that doesn't have funding to operate this winter what each of these services needs is core operating funding so that there will never again be a question of whether or not they can be available Anabeti Akshini Fineshkum Deputy Grand Chief with Nishnabiyaski nation notes that with Thunder Bay being the hub for many individuals not only first nations but other individuals who come here for services the lack of street outreach threatens lives with winter quickly approaching will the premier move further to do what is necessary and provide the funding needed to keep these important street outreach services open in Thunder Bay the associate minister of mental health and evictions thank you mr speaker and thank you for that question just recently actually last week I was in Thunder Bay and had the opportunity along with our member from Thunder Bay Atacocan to meet at the united way and to meet the people that were involved in SOS and look at it as a important part in the continuum of care that we're looking to build not just in Thunder Bay but around the province in all rural remote communities and in the cities one of the things that we learned about it was it is a piece that's necessary but in addition to that we also have to look at the housing needs and that's something that the minister of municipal affairs of housing is looking at and we are taking an all of government approach along with the legislation that we're looking to bring forward and have passed to ensure that we have that continuum of care because we understand that the individuals whether they be living on the street or whether their individuals in need of support need to have housing if we want to ensure that they do not end up on the street again so we are looking at it and we are working with the community to ensure that those supports and services are there Next question the member for Ajax Thank you Mr Speaker I understand the need this is to the Associate Minister for Women and Economic Affairs as a woman I understand the need to help women across Ontario thrive at home at work and especially in my community of Ajax one of my top priorities helping to remove barriers to economic security and prosperity by working with community organisations we can lift women up and empower them to excel in business leadership role as well as entrepreneurs and in sectors where they're often underrepresented In the investment in the Women's Futures programme partners with community organisations across the province and has a proven track record of bringing women off the sidelines and into the heart of our economy Speaker can the Associate Minister of Women's Social and Economic Opportunities please tell us what she's doing to ensure the growth of this great programme Thank you Mr. Speaker and I thank the Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Education for the question and thank you for the work that you're doing to address the barriers that prevent women from entering I'd like to take a moment to highlight an inspiring quote from a woman that I met in Thunder Bay her name was Sarah a woman who recently attended an IWF recipient centre that successfully supported her in pivoting to the online market during the pandemic Sarah said I realise I can do a lot more than I thought I am able and capable of I just needed the proper education and support system with female mentors I now feel my future will be different and I am able to build on my skills Mr. Speaker when women re-enter the workforce and have wraparound supports the mentorship and counselling response offered through IWF are vital to their success and when women feel supported it builds their confidence and helps them address the challenges we are going to continue to do that Mr. Speaker because we know this program works Time for question period has now expired that concludes our question period for this morning and I want to remind members that and ask them to remain in the chamber after we recessed the house for the group photograph that we have planned Pursuant to Standing Order 36a the member for Toronto St. Paul's has given notice of her dissatisfaction with the answer to her question given by the Minister of Children Community and Social Services concerning developmental disabilities this matter will be debated today following private members public business now we have a


In this lesson I'm going to show you step by step how to write a band 9 response for pie charts. I'll show you a simple method that will help you understand any pie chart and give you this simple structure that my students have used to write band 7, 8 and 9 responses for pie charts. So let's dive in and I'll show you how to write your response sentence by sentence. So the first thing we need to do is understand the question and understand the data and a lot of students get scared when they see pie charts but they're really nothing to be scared of and I'm going to show you how easy they are really to understand. So the first important thing is you will normally get two or three maybe even four pie charts but there's nothing to be scared of the more pie charts there is isn't going to make it more complicated but the question format never changes you will always have a question statement giving you information about the data this is really helpful so make sure that you read that and understand it so for this one it says the charts below show the share of the Swiss watch market by brand in 2020 and 2021 so you always have the information here helping you understand it and this is also going to be really important for our introduction which will come on to in a minute or two then it says summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant so a different way of thinking about main features is important features so it's asking you to look at the data look at the pie charts and select the most important data not all of the data you should never attempt to write every single piece of data that you see and make comparisons where relevant if it's relevant if it's important you should make comparisons but if there aren't any important comparisons you don't have to write about those so many students look at pie charts and think like I don't know anything about pie charts I'm not a mathematician I don't know anything about statistics but if you compare this raw data so on the screen now you'll see the raw data that I used to create these pie charts would you rather write a report about the raw data or would you rather write a report about the pie charts pie charts are designed to make data more digestible easier to understand so if you switch your thinking from I hate pie charts to oh good here are pie charts they're making it easy for me to understand then it just psychologically makes task one a lot less stressful and makes your task much much much easier the other thing that I hear from students is I don't know anything about this topic I don't know anything about this data you don't need to know anything about the topic so I specifically picked this subject because very few people in the world know anything about luxury Swiss watches but the only two things that you need to understand are number one what is a watch do you know what a watch is and number two do you know that there are different brands different companies that make watches that is the extent of your knowledge required to answer this question you might not have ever heard of Patek Philippe or AP Audemars Piguet or Cartier it doesn't matter they're not testing your knowledge they're testing your ability to look at the pie charts and report what you see so the most important thing that you need to do is understand the data and there's one question you need to ask yourself in order for you to fully understand the data very very quickly remember we only have 20 minutes to write this and that question is what is the purpose of this data why did they make this chart this is real data that you can find this was made by Morgan Stanley Bank well they made it for two reasons number one they made it to compare the six different Swiss brands and they made it to compare the two different years 2020 and 2021 so once you start thinking about it in this way what is the purpose of the data why did they make it it makes it much much easier to understand and gives you laser focus and helps you write your response so now that we've read the question and we've understood the data let's think about how to write our answer let's look at the structure that we give our students so for task one academic we use this pyramid structure paragraph one is going to be our introduction paragraph two our overview and then paragraph three our details paragraph number one paragraph four details paragraph number two the reason why I have made it into a pyramid is to help students think about how much information they are giving in each paragraph in the introduction you're simply introducing the topic introducing to the reader what is this data about so you're including no detail whatsoever in the overview all you're focusing on are the most important things you're not really going into detail it's a little bit more detail than the introduction but all you're doing is picking out two three four important things and telling the reader what they are in your overview you are then going into detail in paragraph three and paragraph four this is where you're going to write about the data you do not write a conclusion because a conclusion is simply your opinion and you're not giving your opinion on any of the data you're reporting it exactly how you see it some students ask can you put the overview at the end you can do that but I just think it makes it much easier for you to think about and you to write about and for the examiner to understand if you put it into this pyramid structure okay let's write our introduction so to write our introduction all we're going to do is look at the question statement here the charts below show the share of the swiss watch market by brand in 2020 and 2021 and we're going to paraphrase this we're going to state it again so that means exactly the same thing but using different words now we don't have to change every single word we just need to change enough of them so that the sentence looks different so the pie charts illustrate the proportion of wristwatch sales by six watchmakers in switzerland in 2020 and 2021 we're not going to try to change the word the the is the you can't change it don't freak out because I repeated a word so the charts we can change that to pie charts don't think of it as repeating the word charts think of it as changing charts to pie charts pie charts is a unit of language below we're not going to write below because the examiner won't see the charts below so we can skip that one show we can change that to illustrate the share of we can change that to the proportion of when we're talking about percentages we can use proportion and now we get into swiss we can change that to switzerland so made in switzerland or the watch market in switzerland watches synonyms of watches are wristwatches timepieces so we could use one of them in our paraphrase market we're really talking about sales here or revenue so you could change the market a market is basically the number of sales or the proportion of sales so we could change it to that and brand instead of brand we could use watchmakers we could use suppliers we could use manufacturers we could use companies there's many different synonyms that we could use and 2020 2021 you can't change that so we have to repeat that so when the examiner looks at this what they're thinking is does it mean the same thing yes it does mean the same thing and have they changed enough of the words in order to paraphrase it effectively and they'll also be thinking are the words accurate are they appropriate is the grammar accurate so we've done all of those things we can move on to the most important paragraph which is the overview now the first thing to say about overviews is they are the most important thing because it is impossible to get more than a six if you do not write an effective overview so if you're hoping to get a band seven overall and you either don't include an overview or you don't write an overview properly then you are severely damaging your chances of getting a seven overall now as we showed you with the pyramid structure you're not going to include any data you're not going to include any detail so you're not going to mention percentages or proportions or numbers at all you might include dates but you're not going to include the detail the detail comes later so here are a few things that you can do to identify the most important things because that's what we're going to include in our overview the most important things that the data shows us so the first thing that we can do is ask yourselves one question what is one thing and only one thing you would say about the data if I was to give you a suitcase of a million dollars but I said you must identify the one important thing about this data what would you say so when I look at this data I think the most significant thing is that Rolex is the biggest in both years it is by far the biggest watch company in both years so that has probably given us at least one thing that we can put into our overview we need between two and four things so in some charts it'll be two some three some four don't really think about the number focus on what is the most important things in there the second thing that you can ask yourself and we've already asked ourselves this is why did they make this what is the purpose of this data that will normally show us the important things so remember we said the purpose number one was to compare the different watch brands and if we do that that tells us that Rolex is number one in both so by asking ourselves these two separate questions we've got the same answer that is a very strong indication that that is a key feature that that is something that we need to put in our overview and then the other purpose is to show the differences between the two years and if we look at the differences between the two years there are two significant things number one Rolex increased their share of the market and the other thing all the other companies decreased so we have two very significant things there normally if you ask yourself those two questions you will get the key features the most important things and you'll be able to put those into your overview if you still are struggling there are a couple of extra questions you might ask yourself often you will see pie charts like this in newspaper articles so if you were looking at the headline of the newspaper article showing this data what would the headline be the headline would probably be something like Rolex continues to dominate the Swiss watch market that is probably a key feature or a second thing that you might ask yourself is if you were writing a report for your boss imagine you work for a big watch company or you work for a jeweler's and your boss says there's some data there can you write me a report on that but just make it very brief just write me a really brief email the top two or three things that you noticed about the data i don't have time to think about this what would you write to him or her you would probably say Rolex was dominant in both years and in fact they increased their share while all others decreased and that is exactly what we're going to put in our overview we always start our overview with overall so the first thing i'm going to put the most important thing Rolex was the most significant supplier by far they were the biggest so that's one key feature second one in both years so i have two key features two important things in that first sentence but because we asked ourselves those series of questions we know that there is more that we can write Rolex also increased its dominance so we're not going to say it increased from 39.5 percent to 46.7 percent remember we're not including any data whilst all other companies lost market share so a good test for your overview is could you cut out this overview and then hand the overview to a stranger and show them the data and would they understand the main points of that data very very quickly so somebody looked at these two pie charts and looked at that overview i think that they would have a very good idea about what the most important things are related to that data so now we can move on further down the pyramid and what we're going to do is get into detail so we're going to write about the percentages about the proportions and really describe exactly what is happening in the pie charts so before you start writing the most important thing to think about is how am i going to organize these details paragraphs because you're going to write two and you should never just look at the data and start writing because the examiner is judging you on how you organize things did you organize it in a logical way that makes it easier for him or her to look at that data and understand it or did you just continue to write just write everything that you see that is illogical it is disorganized it is difficult to read remember the point of writing is to help and communicate with the reader not just to write everything that we see so there are a few questions that you should ask yourself when you're thinking about how should i organize the data in the details paragraphs number one what is the most logical way of writing it so there are a few different things that we could do with this pie chart we could just write about 2020 in the first details paragraph and then write about 2021 in the second details paragraph that would seem logical another logical thing to do would be to break it down by size so we could write about Rolex omega and Cartier in our first details paragraph and then we could write about the three smallest in the second details paragraph or another logical way to write about it would be write about the ones that increased in percentage so we would write just about Rolex in the first details paragraph and then we would write about all the others because they all decreased now the second question you're going to ask yourself is what is the easiest way for you to write about this and the easiest way to write about it will be the easiest way for the reader to understand so we have three different options here years size or increase decrease so when we think about it it's going to be quite difficult to write just about 2020 and just about 2021 because we're going to get confused because we need to make comparisons between the two years so it's going to be very difficult to actually write about it in that way so what we can do with that one is we can put an x through that option we're not going to just do that because it's difficult to write about that next could we write about just the ones that increased in one paragraph or we're only going to write about Rolex and there's really not enough data to write just about Rolex because we only have two percentages so it's going to be quite difficult to put that into one main details paragraph so we're not going to do that that leaves us with option of writing about the three biggest and then writing about the three smallest that will allow us to make comparisons will be easy to write about and will be logical and easy for the reader so we're going to pick that one so you can see just by asking ourselves though two questions what is logical and what is easy that will help us organize the data in our details paragraphs so let's write about Rolex Omega and Cartier so look how I've started my details paragraph the three biggest watch manufacturers in 2020 why have I done this because I'm guiding the examiner I'm showing the examiner this is what I'm going to write about again make it easy for the examiner so I'm showing them that I'm organizing my data in this way where Rolex Omega and Cartier don't worry about repeating Rolex Omega Cartier all of the brand names because there's literally no other way that you can write Rolex Rolex is Rolex and now we include the detail with 39.5 percent 15.6 percent and 14.5 percent respectively respectively is a crucial word that you need to use and understand for task one academic it allows you to list data and attribute that data to different entities that you're writing about very very important however was Rolex increased its share to almost half so if you see a percentage like 46.7 you can write almost half if it was 50.1 you could say just over half if it was 24.4 you could say just under a quarter or something like that but you don't have to do that for every percentage however whilst Rolex so we're using whilst to compare so we're saying Rolex did this but the others did something else so while Rolex increased Omega decreased to this so if we're thinking about the purpose of this data we've definitely showed the difference between those three but remember the other purpose is to compare the two years and when we look at the two years we can see that Omega was number two and Cartier was number three but in 2021 Omega dropped to number three and Cartier replaced them in the number two position so Cartier's percentage dropped but their position their ranking remember we are comparing the different brands changed so that should be mentioned so despite a minor decrease of 0.7 so I've taken 14.5 taken 13.8 away that's 0.7 the 13.8 in 2021 Cartier replaced Omega as the second highest watch brand in 2021 so we have finished our first details paragraph because we know that we are writing about the three biggest brands that's all we're going to write about them next let's move on to Patek Philippe Longines and AP AP is Audemars Biguet apologies to any french speakers out there if I'm mispronouncing any of these I've started it off with the remaining three competitors again just like the three biggest watch manufacturers in 2020 I'm indicating to the examiner what the paragraph is about I'm showing them that I've thought about organization and this is what I'm going to write about so they each had 10.3 10.1 10 percent I'm going to put them all together around a tenth but all fell by around one percent in 2021 so these are approximations they don't have to be exact they only have to be correct so is it correct to say that this was around a tenth each and they all fell by approximately one percent yes that's correct and if you wanted to change that from around to approximately just to vary your language you could do that as well the reason why I'm not changing that is I would have to rewrite the entire thing and I'm not going to do that okay so looking at this detail which ones are we going to write about is there anything else interesting is there anything else significant well which one dropped the most so that was Patek Philippe Patek Philippe went from 10.3 to 8.8 that was the biggest drop so probably we'll include that so of the three smallest brands Patek Philippe fell the most dropping from 10.3 percent to 8.8 percent or you could just put in the percentage that it did drop doesn't really matter either are both accurate okay the next interesting thing is Audemars Piguet AP because AP went from the smallest so they were in sixth position to the fourth position so they jumped up from sixth last to number four which is significant remember the purpose is to compare those brands if you were AP you would be very happy about this you've just leapfrogged two of your biggest competitors well Long Jean isn't really a competitor with AP but Patek definitely is so Audemars Piguet went from the smallest share in 2020 to the fourth largest in 2021 and then it's the details paragraph so let's put in our detail achieving a percentage of 9.1 percent so you might look at this and think well you didn't write about Long Jean's you don't have to write about all of the data what does the question say select and report the main features it doesn't say write everything that you see just like the brand itself and the watches themselves there's nothing really interesting about the Long Jean's data so we're not going to include it the final thing you would do is you would check for any grammar any vocabulary mistakes hopefully I haven't made anything or any mistakes but if I have my lovely editor will edit them out and that's how to write a pie chart answer if you want a video on bar charts click this and it will show you how to write bar charts