Chair now recognizes Ms. Batsui for five minutes. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and as co-chair of the Congressional Spectrum Caucus, along with Mr. Guthrie, I want to thank you for holding this important hearing. Spectrum Governance is a fundamental part of sustaining America's competitive edge in the 21st century. From five and six, Wi-Fi six, and a satellite broadband, it's important that the federal government speaking with one voice to move us forward. I have a question regarding Spectrum Pipeline to ensure that the United States remains a global pace-sitter and wireless communications technology, a reliable pipeline, a spectrum as needed. But we have exciting opportunities coming up in the 2.5 and 3 GHz bands. Beyond that, the picture becomes less clear. I believe the 7 GHz band presents a meaningful opportunity to keep our pipelines strong. However, given the amount of federal users in that band, we need to proceed carefully with a whole-of-government approach. And that's why I sent a letter to NTI Administrator Davis and yesterday, urging him to commit to finishing the 2019 study on 7 GHz. Mr. Geiss, Mr. Bergman, can you describe the characteristics of the 7 GHz band and how they might be put to use to support commercial operations? Thank you, Congresswoman Matsui, and thank you for your leadership on spectrum issues. You've really been a great asset for everybody to have on these issues. What I would say is that this is another example where mixed access regimes will be beneficial to the outcome. What we learned in CBRS was that based on spectrum coordination over a period of years, four to five years of coordination, hearing the agencies out and working through the NTIA and FCC interagency process, only after that period of hearing folks and really taking in their perspective, did we get to a situation where we could utilize the most of that band? And 7 GHz were their very sensitive military systems and a real need for DOD to have its voice heard through the NTIA process, only by doing that can we really utilize this band to its fullest potential. Like I indicated, I think the lower 7 GHz is a real opportunity for unlicensed, but we do see that there might be licensed opportunities. But I think only by going in with that sort of open mind for a variety of access regimes can we get the federal agencies to really focus on what the realm of the possible is for that band.


What is going on guys? It's your boy dpj here today with another destiny video and today I'm going to show you guys how you can simply rank up the gunsmith three times per week, therefore getting three weapons per week, with basically relative ease not going to lie to you guys but before we go any further into the video, if you guys want to be in the chance of winning this resurrectionist emblem simply drop a like on the video and leave a comment, details are on screen now now we all know banshee the gunsmith found in the tower, you can rank him up to do this you need to complete the field test weapons which he brings five per week a lot of people ignore these because they think it just takes too long and a lot of the time you won't even get a rank for the ones you do each week as you can see my gunsmith is a rank ten, to be honest with you guys he's probably been a rank ten on my hunter for about four or five months, I can't remember the last time I actually did one of these but actually with this little trick it's relatively simple if you do the nightfall each week and get the radiant light xp buff which gives you basically increased xp gains across the board you do that first then go to the gunsmith each week and you do these fields, well actually you only have to do four because you'll get 500 xp per weapon it's only 2000 xp to rank him up but if you do five per week that would mean next week you'd only have to do three and the remaining two would take two after one you'd have to do a week after so it gets easier as you go along now as you can see this one here you need to use against vex targets to gather field data for the suicide search department this one here you have to also defeat vex, this one here you just have to get kills this one here you have to kill fallen, this one here you have to kill a cabal now these four here you can do on one planet you can do all four of these on Venus which will take you literally five minutes, five minutes to do all this and you'll get a rank with a gunsmith giving you the chance to get a decent weapon now not all the time these weapons drop and they're decent, they can drop pretty bad but you can, there's a chance you'll get a decent perfect rolled weapon there really is, now if you do this on all three characters per week that's three weapons per week from the gunsmith with relative ease just remember to do the night full first now we're going to actually go, we're going to travel to Venus and do this and see what we get just for video recording purposes okay guys so I'm on literally the last stages of the final weapon I decided to come to Mars and do the cabal one as well I mean why the hell not I may as well get that okay so I need one more cabal enemy I'm guessing I'm just going to simply jump on Mars Baron right over here there should be an enemy over here yes there is, right there but yeah this is literally taking me no word of a lie probably about ten minutes tops ten minutes tops and that's with flying to each planet and I've done absolutely everyone and I've taken my gunsmith rank to almost eleven and three quarters when you guys saw I was on a sixty points of rank ten and that's from doing five bounty so like I said guys get that night full buff before you do these weapons each week and you'll do four weapons per week per character and you will get that gunsmith weapon can be bad, can be pretty damn epic we'll see what I've got right now okay so let's see what the gunsmith's going to give me no my look though I'll get some pretty bad it's just a well it must actually delete some of these now because I actually don't need them it's just blocking up my inventory as you can see my light level is pretty low if I apply that there apply that why not let's get rid of that and get rid of that too okay so what are you going to give me what are you going to give me okay so there's the package I just got a DIS 47 okay so this could be good okay so we've got a faster reload feed stock or appended mag we've got spray and play snapshot and injection mode so not the best but this is actually this is kind of it's kind of like a legendary version of the melee multi-tool obviously the end is good but you can get much better I've actually got better rolls so just for example guys you guys saw a weapon actually relatively easy to get to do this three times per week across all three well obviously three times per week once per character but yeah so as a rank 10 60 points over as you can see now I am a rank 11 over half so next week I only have to do two of these and I'll get another rank do the remaining three and I'll probably get two ranks next week or really close to that so you actually get 625 per rank well per weapon you do so you get 625 XP per weapon you actually do obviously though when you've done the nightfall first but yes guys hope you enjoyed the video hope it helps you out if you do this and get any decent weapons let me know down below in that comment section thanks as always for stopping by and I will see you on that next one


Welcome back to another week of What's For Dinner. My name is Andrea with Food and Mentory Adventures in Food. Our channel is all about the food. We do taste test, grocery hauls, recipes, and What's For Dinner. And we are kicking off another week with a good old fashioned ham dinner. Howard made this ham and it looks and actually tastes really good. So that's what we have here. We have some ham. It was bone in ham. And I made some green beans and I used the skin from the ham to season the green beans. And then I made my shortcut macaroni and cheese and I will make sure to link the video where I shared the recipe in the description box. So this is what we're having for dinner tonight and we'll see you guys next time. Hey guys, so for dinner tonight, we are having some Chinese food. I went and picked some up after work. Never tried this place before, but it looked pretty good on Yelp. So we have some combination fried rice and it has steak, chicken, and shrimp. So there it is. And then I've got two veggie egg rolls and it comes with some sauce there, which I probably won't eat. I'm not a big sauce person. And then I got two containers of hot and sour soup. One for me, one for Howard. And that's what it looks like. And then it comes with these crunchy noodles, which I love and have to eat every time I have hot and sour soup. So anyway, this is what we are having for dinner tonight and we'll see you guys next time. Hey guys, so for dinner tonight, we are still eating the ham that Howard made and we're just having breakfast for dinner today. So we've got the ham and then we've got some jumbo biscuits, flaky ones from Kroger. And here is what we're having. I actually did not realize that they were honey butter. I'm not a big honey butter person, but hopefully they don't taste too sweet. So we're having those biscuits and then I made my savory scrambled eggs. If you've been watching our channel for a while, you know that I use french fried onions, cheddar cheese in my scrambled eggs. So you can see some of the french fried onions in there. So anyway, this is what we are having for dinner tonight and we'll see you guys next time. Hey guys, I just wanna show you what we are having for dinner tonight. This is the shrimp scampi kit from the Food Network. And we have tried one of these kits before, not this flavor, I think it was Sichuan chicken and we did not care for it at all. But this is what we're having tonight. Let me show you what comes in the little kit. It comes with linguini and let me put it in the box so I can show you. This is what comes in there. So it comes with the linguini, garlic and herb seasoning, parmesan cheese and dried onions, as you can see right there. The other stuff is in these packages so you can't really see, but here's the dried onions. And then what I need to add to it are uncooked medium shrimp, butter, parsley is optional and lemon. So I had to modify this recipe because I actually already have cooked shrimp that I needed to use. It was in my refrigerator. We had an event to go to this past weekend but we had a really bad weather so the event was canceled and I needed to use this shrimp. So I am using cooked shrimp and I am going to skip out on the lemon because Howard's not big on lemon and savory food. So I'm gonna skip out on that. And then it comes with this prep card and it gives you step-by-step on what you need to do. So I am going to start prepping this and I will show you the finished product. So here is the finished product. It was really simple to make, very quick. I will say that I did find it to be a little bit bland. Now I did not add in the lemon juice, as I mentioned, or the parsley. I don't know if that would have made a difference but after I prepared it, I felt like it needed a little bit of doctoring up. So I added in some chopped garlic and then I also added in some garlic salt and a little bit more butter. So here it is. And it's okay. I don't think, let me show you the picture again, I don't think that I would buy it again. I think I would just make my own shrimp scampi. And then we are having it with garlic bread and we've, I've shown this before and it is the tom thumb variety, the garlic toast, five cheese, hearth or hearth? I don't know, Howard says I say it wrong but anyway, I think it's hearth, baked bread and it's really, really good. I would definitely buy this again. You guys know I'm a huge fan of the Pepperidge Farm Five Cheese. I think I like this better. The slices are really, really thick and there's tons of cheese as you can see and it was cheaper than the Pepperidge Farm. So anyway, this is what we are having for dinner tonight and we'll see you guys next time. Hey guys, I just wanna show you what I am having for dinner tonight. I am flying solo. Howard is at a church conference and so he's eating there and I had some errands to run after work and I decided to stop by Market Street which is a grocery store here and I used to eat there all the time. They have a really good hot bar. So let me show you what I'm having. I am having their rotisserie chicken. Now, originally I had asked for two chicken thighs. That is my preference for pieces but the guy put the first chicken thigh on my plate and it was so tiny. It was like the size of a chicken nugget. I'm not exaggerating and normally I just take whatever I get because I don't complain but I said, I was like, that's a little small, isn't it? And he went to look for some more and he couldn't find any more. So instead I'm having two drumsticks and you can't really tell on camera but these are tiny too. They're very small and then I'm also having some of their macaroni and cheese and mashed potatoes and you get to pick a bread which is a roll or cornbread. I didn't feel like having any bread tonight. I have enough carbs on my plate. So this is what I'm having for dinner tonight and see you guys next time.


Okay, we're back live here in Silicon Valley in the heart of big data at Santa Clara, California. This is Silicon Angles exclusive coverage of Riley Media Stratoconference, day two of three-day broadcast wall-to-wall coverage. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante, wikibon.org. This is theCUBE, and we are here with Quantcast. Jim Kelly, who's the VP of R&D at Quantcast. Jim, welcome to theCUBE. Thank you very much. So you got a little interesting angle on all this. Quantcast obviously collects a lot of data.  For those who don't know, Quantcast is a service that... We use. We use. We're quantified. Check it out. Glad to hear that. Silicon Angle Network.  You know, we get that a lot. We prefer Google Analytics. We actually think Alexa is a better audience. Google Analytics numbers are actually higher. I think Alexa Toolbar market is not doing too well. Maybe we could talk offline to help us out. But it's all good. We're one of the few sites in our business that Quantify it. We're proud to. And we really appreciate that service. It's fantastic. But you guys have some interesting things going on. You're obviously big data practitioners. And why don't you tell us sort of your angle on things and then we'll get into the Quantcast file system. We are indeed big data practitioners. We've been doing big data since 2006. We were big data before big data was cool. And we ended up innovating a lot of our own technologies to handle the volumes we were getting. And one of them was our file system, the Quantcast file system, which we built to deliver better cost efficiency, especially at large scale. And we've developed it over five or six years internally. We run our business on it. And in September, we released it to open source so that other organizations could use it as well. Okay, so tell us, why does the world need an alternative to HDFS? What's the problems there that you're trying to address that you obviously addressed internally? Well, the biggest problem we were trying to address is just how much it costs to process big data. Hardware costs a lot. And when you're doing big data, big data sets tend to grow and the costs tend to grow as well. And it's not just disk drives, it's servers and it's racks and it's operating costs around power and cooling and real estate for renting space in co-location facilities. And it's operating staff to keep it all going. And it costs a lot. So once you're operating at scale, you're going to be paying five, six, seven figures per month on your computing power. And so what we built was a more efficient file system that makes better use of space and that effectively doubles the storage capacity of a Hadoop cluster versus stock HDFS. So, I look at this as almost like a little mini AWS, right? You have all this cool tech internally and say, hey, we can make a business out of this. Let's, you know, put it externally and help the community out. Yeah, and we're not trying to make a business out of it. But we're, you know, Quankcast is in the audience measurement and advertising business. And we don't sell file systems. We don't sell support around file systems, but this has added a lot of value to us. And we've used so much open source software internally and benefited from it so much. It's really good to be able to give back. So, the value that you get out of doing this is you get more contributors, more people actually, you know, innovating around the environment, right? Because you can't do it all yourself. Is that right? Yeah, well, it means a lot to developers. You know, if you're a developer, it's a good thing to be contributing to an open source project because it gives you a chance to make a bigger impact. And so it's popular with our team. And for the company, you know, file systems, especially are really critical pieces of infrastructure that benefit from the scrutiny that the open source model provides. So we get some benefit that way as well. So what are your objectives specifically and how will you measure the success of this initiative? Well, success for us is getting some high quality collaborators and extending the product together. Okay, so when you say getting some, I mean, we're talking dozens, you want hundreds, you want thousands, what would you consider a successful endeavor? No, I don't think we have such grand ambitions. As I say, we're primarily audience measurement and advertising, and that's going to be our focus, but I think this is an opportunity for other organizations to take it and run with it. So paint a picture if you could. I don't know how deep you can go, but really help us understand the internal environment at Quantcast to the extent you can. You talked about the infrastructure, servers are expensive, storage is expensive. Paint a picture of us. What's it look like under the covers to the extent that you can share with us? Well, it's pretty big. We get over 50 terabytes of data in the door per day. We process on the average day over 20 petabytes and doing it on about 1,000 machines, reasonably modest hardware. So all the components of our system get a fair amount of exercise. We hammer on them pretty hard. So when you say modest hardware, I mean, would you consider yourselves a sort of a hyperscale class or are you sort of buying from ODMs? Or do you buy traditional three-letter server vendor or two-letter server vendor hardware? Well, we buy commodity hardware. We speck it out ourselves. We've always been really cost-conscious. Back when we got started, we were a small self-funded startup with decent-sized data and a very modest budget. And our budget has grown a little since then, which is a good thing, but we're still very cost-conscious and really conscious of how much we're paying for hardware and how efficiently the software is. So what does that mean? I'm not even sure what commodity hardware is anymore. Is that Dell commodity hardware or is Quanta commodity hardware? Well, sure, more or less. I mean, as opposed to an appliance, if you want to buy a rack of Nutiza, for example, it's going to set you back a million dollars. And if you want the equivalent of a rack's worth of hardware at Amazon, that'll cost you a million dollars per year. And it adds up really fast. So Amazon's the more expensive in that equation, folks. As we've been saying. If you're buying off the rack, so to speak, a rack's worth of hardware will cost more like $200,000 and tens of thousands of dollars per year to operate. Okay, so it's not exadata, it's not, okay, it's not the purpose-built appliance. You talked about 2x the efficiency of, for instance, HDFS. Can you talk a little bit more about the tech behind that and how you achieve that? Absolutely, so the number one challenge in designing a distributed file system is fault tolerance. When you've got 100 machines or 1,000 machines, you can't expect them all to be up and running at any given time. So your software needs to be able to tolerate bits of your data going missing. And the way HDFS does that is it makes three copies of all the data, which works fine, but it's expensive. It means you need three times the disk space and three times the servers and three times the power and three times the cooling and so forth. Tried the true brute force approach. Yes. But not the most efficient. No, no, so QFS uses Reed-Solomon encoding, which, or erasure coding, which has been around for decades, it's in CDs, DVDs, they used it in the transmission protocol for the Mars rover, among other things. Heavy math. It's heavy math, it's got a long lineage, but it hasn't seen a ton of use in distributed file systems. But we put it in QFS because it's got a big space savings. Whereas HDFS takes triple the storage, QFS takes only one and a half times. So relative to HDFS, it saves half your disk space. Okay, so you're creating slices and distributing data and then you can lose X number and then recreate them. Right, you're creating data slices and parity slices and by default, we use six data slices and three parity slices and then we write those to nine separate places and if we can read any six, if any six remain readable, then we can reconstruct the original data. And that's good, that means that's actually a little better fault tolerance than you get from HDFS. If you're making three copies of your data, you can afford to lose two, but you better not lose three. We can afford to lose three. Do you encrypt the slices? No, we don't encrypt the slices. Do you see that as a need that the open source community might pick up, for example? Is that sort of on the to-do list or not necessarily a high priority? Well, I think the security features that are probably higher on the to-do list are more things around authentication, not necessarily encrypting the data per se. Although there are plenty of other layers where it makes sense that you might want to encrypt the data. Right, okay, so we talked about the to-do list. Where would you like to see and where do you encourage the community to pick up sort of the innovation and where are you guys spending your time when they're working that? It's a good question, and I think the, for Hadoop, Hadoop serves a very broad set of customers with a very broad set of use cases. And we've had a pretty specific one around the scale we're operating at and our desire for cost efficiency. And I think the opportunity is for other people who have other sorts of use cases that don't line up very well with ours to go and build them themselves. I know other organizations care more about federation or they care more about high availability and those haven't been high priorities for us, but they may be higher for them. And so we're trying to give them the tools to build them if they want. So since you've announced the give back to the open source community, what kind of uptake have you seen? Are people actually experimenting with it, deploying it? Yeah, we're seeing a fair amount of experimentation and we're seeing a little deployment. I think the challenge with an open source project is unlike licensed software where someone's paying you, you put it out there and you don't necessarily know who's running it. And this thing is, it works pretty well, so people don't have to come back to us for a lot of help. I think they're kind of self-sufficient with it. But yeah, we do know of other places that are using it and they're happy with it and that's great news, excellent. All right Jim, well listen, we really appreciate you coming by and sharing the Quantcast story and congratulations on the give back to the community. And good to see you, nice to meet you. Okay, well, I didn't get a word in edgewise, Dave. Thanks for your great interview. Sorry, John, sorry. Love Quantcast, you guys doing real time data. Thanks for having on theCUBE. We'll be right back on our next segment, theCUBE, a Stratoconference. Combining down day two, getting ready to do a wrap up here. Wall to wall covers three days of in depth coverage. We'll be right back with our next guest of this short break.