because of the left. The whole agenda of the left right now is focused on bringing about some form of equality. And to do that, they have to convince us, they have to convince all of us that inequality is evil, that inequality is bad. Now, what's interesting is, if you read Ayn Rand, Ayn Rand was talking about this 50 years ago. This whole discussion of egalitarianism, of the benefits of equality, of the evil of inequality, is not new. It was big in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Rand talks about it quite a lot. And the left, it was a big agenda of the left back then. It kind of died out and kind of went away. And it seems to really have come back with the Obama administration. Really as a major thrust of what they're trying to do, of what they want to do. And I think what happened in the 1970s is this inequality debate, in a sense, hit a kind of a brick wall. And the brick wall is the American spirit. Americans don't like the idea of equality. We just reject it. It's somehow wrong. We admire achievement. We admire success. We look at, historically, Americans have looked at wealthy people and said, wow, I want to be like that. I want to be successful. And they've attributed people success to their own abilities, to their own hard work, to their own innovation, to the use of their own minds. So Americans have always had a healthy view of success. Another thing that the inequality debate is challenged by is the fact that Americans, again, historically, have been individualist. They viewed the individual as the important unit in politics, in life. It's about individual success. It's about individual prosperity, not in terms of classes. I mean, nobody talked in terms of classes in America until relatively recently. It was about, how does this affect individuals? So when the left started talking about these issues of inequality and we want to achieve equality, Americans rebelled against us. This isn't the American thing to believe in. And then the Berlin Wall falls. And that whole idea of equality kind of disappears. Why has it come back again today? Well, I think what the left has been doing over the last 20 to 30 years and what it's doing even more intensely today is trying to lay the foundation for the success of the idea of this equality. And equality of what? Equality of outcome is what they want, right? Equality of abilities, equality of just equality. They can't really even define it. Equality of happiness, I've heard people talk about, right? They want some equality of outcome. But they need to lay the foundations. And how are you going to lay the foundations out? How are you going to make it saleable to the American people? How are you going to get the American people to buy into this idea? Well, the only way to do that is to undercut those two ideas, the idea of success and the idea of individualism. And that, I think, is what the left has been dedicating itself a long time, writing about it in subtle different ways. They've been writing about it. They've been working on it. They've been trying to find ways in which they can attack the notion of individual success, the notion, more fundamentally, of individualism, to prep the American people so that we become much more accepting of the idea, the egalitarian idea, the idea of equality, the idea of the evil of inequality. So let's talk a little bit about how they've been doing that. I mean, you saw this in an obvious way with Obama. And you can even see the sequence of this. Even before he talked about inequality and even of inequality, what was the first thing that Obama talked about? It was, you didn't build it. I mean, you didn't build it. Is a direct attack on what? On the notion that you as an individual are successful, that you as an individual have earned something. You didn't build that is an attack directly on the notion of personal responsibility, of responsibility for your own achievements. And if it's not your own achievements, if you're not responsible for the wealth you have, for the income you have, for whatever it is that you've created and built, then what's the big deal about taking it away from? It's not yours. It's ours. Note that he does two things very successfully here. I mean, successfully, we'll see. But he does try to do two things. One is attack the notion of success and attack the notion of individual. It's we helped you. It's not even any particular individual who helped you. If it's this particular school teacher who helped you, then I can write them a check. That's easy. I can take care of that. And indeed, that's what we do. Bill Gates didn't write all the software for Microsoft. True. But he paid everybody who helped him write that software, right? But it's not about those individuals. It's this ambiguous, amorphous, undefined we, this collective that's unspecified, the people who built the roads, the people who built the schools, and your favorite teacher, and your employees, and your suppliers. And it's we built it. So it's not your money because you didn't build it. It's not you are not responsible for it. Again, what they're trying to do is delink what's yours from your own efforts. And if they can do that, then they can take it from you. They can build the legitimacy for the idea that whether you're Bill Gates or you're a bum on the streets, your equal can neither one deserves it. You didn't build it. Now, but you didn't build it has deeper roots. It has much deeper roots that again, go back over the last 20 to 30 years to philosophy, to ideas that are being taught at our universities and our schools that are being preached by some of our leading businessmen. And this is the idea much more fundamentally that you didn't build it. Because everything you build, even if you literally built it, is just a consequence of luck. Luck? I mean, Bill Gates is lucky. There's a wonderful book, wonderful, because it's very well written. I forgot its name, of course. The guy who wrote Tipping Point, Gladwell. Malcolm Gladwell wrote a book. And he explains that Bill Gates just happened to go to school that happened to have a computer lab, and that he happened to have some opportunities to work in that computer lab. And he happened to do this, and he happened to do that. It wasn't him. It just, the stuff happened to him. And again, it goes even deeper than now, because it's not just the luck of circumstance that they talk about. But it's an even deeper luck, and Bill Gates talks about this himself. Bill Gates was born with particular genes that are suitable for a pro, you know, to be a computer guy and a businessman. He was born in a century where those genes were particularly useful, right? He was born to a family that encouraged him. He had no control over his family, his genes, or the century he was born into. This is all luck, right? And if you don't, you know, now, this all comes from John Wall's philosophy and a lot of other kind of leftist thinkers that have been talking about this for the last 20 years. But there's a prominent businessman who says this all the time, and he talks exactly in this language. Anybody know who that is? Juan Buffett. Juan Buffett talks this language. You'll see him in interviews talking about, well, I'm just lucky. And what he means is this deeper form of luck, right? So the wealth he made isn't his. He didn't build it. It just happened because he has the right genes and the right family and the right education, the right century, and so on. And he was in the right place at the right time. And of course, Bill Gates is Juan Buffett's protege, so you're starting to see Bill Gates talk like this, right? So these ideas are entering. Again, it's all time to cut. It's all to subvert this idea that you built it, that you're responsible for your life, that you're responsible for creating and building and making stuff. Because if you're not, again, then how come it's fair that you have all this stuff from other people? And we'll see the assumption built into that, the corrupting assumption there, right? So the idea is that you didn't create stuff. You didn't build it. But they have to build further on this, right? They have to continuously advocate for this notion that it's not yours. Or if it is yours, there's an injustice. Because again, American people are pretty stubborn about this idea of respecting ability, respecting achievement, and respecting individuals. So you see entering into the language more and more ideas that reflect, implicitly reflect, implicitly and explicitly reflect, the notion that if you have a lot, one, you probably didn't build it, and two, you actually took it from somebody. Or that the fact that you have it means other people don't. And you see this whole notion of a zero-sum world, nobody actually admits to believing in zero-sum. Nobody actually advocates for zero-sum, but it's in the language. It's in the giving back that so many of our rich philanthropists talk about. We give back, what did you take? What did you take that you have to give back? But if it's a zero-sum world, anything that they have, they took from somewhere. It's in Obama's speech, the latest state of the Union. When he didn't say the wealthy make, he said the wealthy take. The wealthy take a big portion of the pie or whatever the term was, right? But it's the taking. It's not making money, it's taking money. And that does, again, two things. It undermines the moral right to whatever they took, because they took it. And implicitly it says it's ours. It's again, this we, right? We built it. It's really ours, and those guys are taking a bigger piece than they share, right? So again, all this is meant to soften us up, to undercut our ability to defend against us, to prepare the American public for, well, inequality's evil because those guys didn't build it. They're taking a bigger part of the pie than they should. It's not theirs to begin with, it's ours. We want some of it back in order to bring about more equality. They even make ridiculous economic arguments to argue that inequality is bad somehow. Again, to appeal to the practical nature of Americans. We want the economy to work. We want economic progress. We want economic success. Haven't you heard that inequality is holding back economic growth, right? I mean, this is common now. Krugman writes about this. Allen Blinder writes about this. The president has talked about this. Inequality slows down economic growth. Now, how does that work? How does it work that inequality slows economic growth? Well, we know, and this is a metaphysical fact, that you cannot question. There were drives the economy as consumption. Drives it, that's the starting point. Because 70% they come up with this bizarre number out of GDP, 70% of GDP is consumption, 70% of the economy is consumption. Therefore, what drives the economy is consumption, right? So you start with that. Who consumes more? The rich or the poor? That's a percentage of their income. The poor, much more, right? Because the rich save and invest. And saving and investment, that's no good for the economy. What drives the economy is consumption. So if you take money away from those nasty investing and saving rich, and you give it to those wonderful consuming poor or middle class or whatever, then the economy will go faster.  It really is, because what drives the economy long term is saving and investment. Put aside the rights issue of all this, but just from a purely economic perspective, you can't consume more than you produce. So how can consumption be 70% of an economy? What are you consuming? Every dollar I used to buy ice cream, I had a work to produce. I can't consume more than my income. Now I can borrow stuff for a while, you can consume more than you produce, but you have to pay back. So you have to, at the very least, it's 50-50. And of course what drives consumption is production. There's the creation of stuff, the building of stuff. Not the, you know what consumption is?  It's gone. Consumption is destruction. Now it's good destruction, the ice cream really tasted well and makes your life better, right? It's good, it's hard to say good destruction, but it's a good form, right? But that's what it is. Production is building stuff, making stuff. That's what is important, that's what drives an economy. So not to say using all these economic arguments. And I'm gonna speculate, this is not wild speculation, that they know they're bogus. They know this isn't true. But they're trying to make this argument, right? Their thing is inequality and they wanna get you to believe that it's bad. And if inequality slows down the economy, the American people are gonna go, oh no, we want economic growth, so let's get rid of inequality. Because we're practical people, we want prosperity, we want success. If that is what we need, by what right? Can we tell those men, go ahead and produce what we want? While we're insulting you, while we're trying to control your business, and while we're not leaving you, that which you produced, today it's crudely obvious, if we need the oil companies, we have only one of the choice. Either we produce oil ourselves and no government has ever done it or can do it. Or we have to accept the oil companies terms, pay them whatever they can get, the more they get, the more credit to them, because that means the country needs it and pays them. They've produced something needed by the people. And we must say thank you, instead of putting or proposing to put a tax on them in order to give the money to the government who does nothing. The government doesn't contribute anything except impediments. But if...


Chill it, don't spill it. Today we have the first 35 minutes of Brahamastra.   I... Am not. It's cause he's boycotting everyone. You all know this. Yeah, it's so funny. You know what the origins of boycotting are? When boys sleep in little cots. That's my joke, but thanks. Yeah. It's from your land. It's from Ireland. And historically, the boycott, Boys and Girls, has been for a singular moment, protesting something morally reprehensible that needs to be changed in society. Yeah, like Bollywood. The constant hashtag boycott BS of every film just because you think that's a cool thing to do.  It's the coolest thing I can think of. Today we got a new trailer, not from Bollywood. It's his... Boycotting it? I hope so. Mamoudi, so I'm assuming it's Malayalam. Hashtag boycott Malayalam. Never. This is Rorschach. Hashtag boycott corporalizations. Rorschach, Rorschach. Rorschach, that's the psychological test. Rorschach, Rorschach. Rorschach, you know about that? Not to be confused with Rorschach from Welcome Back Cotter. Ooh, ooh, Miss Decata! That was not scripted, by the way. Or rehearsed. Well, him saying it in the show probably was. What he did, but not what we did. Because what we did was cool. Anyways, I don't know if it's bad, I just know it's Mamoudi. Rorschach. And it just came out. It's a psychological thing. No, I don't know. Is it? It's gotta be. If it's involving a Rorschach test, there's gonna be ink blots. Oh, is that what that is? Yeah. Okay, now I understand. I see a penis. Here we go. I don't want to go away from here if I keep the rest of the things. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Yeah. Think about it. Or you can call this guy in the party card. He'll make a great story. But he's got a lot of people who want to see him. That was a movie. You were the issue skinned. He's the world's fraud. Dad's wife. Don't do anything. He's the one who got us into trouble. He's the only one who can look at the camera. He's the UK citizen. He's a very good friend of mine. I don't know if he's the only one here. I don't know. What do you think about him? I don't know. I don't know what to say. I don't know what to say. I don't know what to say. So that's probably where the name comes from. Maybe. Unless that means something else. It very well could. It just may be coincidental that it's Rorschach. Is that what that means? Just like it shouldn't say that. Rorschach. It looked cool. Not to be confused with the love shack. It looked like a cool trailer. It did. A teaser. And it looks like it's a thriller slash possibly has some horror elements involved. It looked like when he had the bag over his head it almost looked like Shah Rukh Khan's one. That's kind of what I thought of. Is that one Jaan? I forget. I forget because he's got three coming out. Pathan. Yeah I think it's Jaan. Jaan one. I think you're right. Because Donkey is the other one. But it kind of reminded me of that. Me too. Remake Malayalam. God. Actually the scarecrow had the bag over his head in Batman. Yeah. Before all that. It looked really cool. Like a psychological thriller. Like Mahmoudi is going to be a badass. Looks cool. What do you think? I think it looked cool too. I hope it falls into the kind of thriller-y, horror-y, scary. Especially this time here. Always looking forward to that. And don't see it a lot in Indian cinema. When we see thrillers quite a bit but not the ones that fall. A little bit more into the horror side of things. Which by the way, another good one. Not as good as Last Shift. But still worthy of watch this Halloween season is a film called Lights Out. We watched that last night. It's very good. It capitalizes on your fear of the dark in a very original way. I don't have a fear of the dark. I was speaking about humanity in general. I'm not racist, Rick. Wow, the fact that you would think that. Evidence is to the contrary. I don't see color. This was her, right? That was the one that I recognized. Yes. Grace Anthony. She was in what? Oh, she was in Kumballaji Nights. Was she in the boxing movie? No. Maybe in just, I guess it's just Kumballaji Nights. I'm not saying wrong. But yeah, I recognize her. And Mamoti looks like he's going to be bad at this. The stunt work is always fun to watch. Because that guy obviously when he punched him and he did like three turns. They had to be wires, right? Yeah, probably. They had to obviously he could probably spin himself, but then to get those other turns, you probably have to be on wires for that. I would think you do. It depends. I mean, you could also get a running start and do that and probably get three in and hit the ground. I think he was just standing still though, because he was just punching him. Yeah, but with the edit, that's another thing I'd love to do. I would love to have an opportunity to talk with some of the leading stunt choreographers and get an idea of what stunt life is like for them in India. Especially since there's so much. Yes, so much of it. And also over the top in terms of like RRR in terms of people just getting punched and then getting thrown across the room. The stunt work in Indian cinema has consistently defied the laws of physics, which means that the stunt work is way beyond the kinds of things that are done here. The things that are done here for the most part are within the realm of realism. Except for obviously superhero films. Yeah, the superhero films, then they go out of the way. Like if the Hulk punches you. But obviously that's what Indian cinema does differently. Yes. Is they have heroes in it that just are superhero-like just because of who they are. Yeah. Mammoody is one of those. But I'd love to see, like back when I was a kid, the first like real legendary stunt man was a guy named Hal Needham. I blew for it, no. No. His name was Hal Needham. And there was actually, I had a Hal Needham play set, which was a thing with like a breakaway thing in a bar and a table he could land on. And it was an action figure play set for Hal Needham. It was the Hal Needham stunt set. And Hal Needham did all of Bert Reynolds films. He did a lot of westerns. He did a lot of horse falls, a lot of high falls. And I would love to like see a compilation video of a stunt person like that from Indian cinema who is like a legend and has 50 years of stunt work to their credit and see all of the stunts.  It's Kamala Son. No. No, he does everything. Actually Akshay is the one that does all of his own stuff, right? Yeah, that's true. Yeah, Akshay is the Tom Cruise of Indian cinema in regard that he does his own stunt. He's Tom's new thing that he posted today. I don't think so. They're announcing the filming of The Next Mission Impossible or whatever. But he's on top of a prop plane. Oh, you see that? No, I have not seen that. He's literally talking to the camera and he's standing on top of the prop plane. Talking about the film? And then he says, see it and it just does like a flip while he's standing on the plane. I think, I don't know if it's in this first part of the second part. And I don't know if he got permission to do it. But there was talk about wanting to do a stunt that left Earth's atmosphere. So I don't know if that's in one of the Mission Impossible's, but... Anyways. Let's see what you thought about the trailer. It looks good. What the piece should be in the next Mammoody and Mali Alam film that we watched. Let us know down below.


We have a giveaway for you, as well as master tips for PVP written by the experts not copy-pasted from another website. Unique information for all of you who play World of Warcraft, Warlords of Draenor, who PVP. Get all that, including the giveaway, on the website behind me, mgnwow.com. You can explore all of the PVP tips for every single class with all the builds and what to do to maximize in 3v3 your strategy. And you can enter the giveaway by simply clicking on the free game time card. And as you can see behind me, I've entered five times. Well, I've only entered once, but I've done the other five things that give me extra chances to win. So tell us down there in the comments below if you've entered this giveaway, if you like the tips about PVP in 3s, and if you're playing World of Warcraft, Warlords of Draenor. I would love to know what class you play. Do you like this new expansion? Tell me all that in the comments below. This is Freedom. And who am I? I am George, founder of Freedom, as well as MGM, our multi-gaming network, the MCN for gamers. MGM is for me, because I am a gamer. Is MGM for you? And are you a gamer? Find out at youtube.com slash MGM. I am George, and you've been watching, and we will grow together as a family, because this is the Freedom family. You are part of it, we are all part of it, and we're all growing together. So grow with us, and partner with Freedom. That play now button right there on the video bar is all you need to click to get started. Thank you for watching.


If it doesn't work for you, don't worry about selecting your seat. And if you can't select your seat properly and the grouping tool doesn't work for you, I give you permission to please join other groups as necessary. And if you're a person, the Picker Tool does work for you and it's telling you who to talk to, please let other people in on your discussions to other people that might not have been included in that. So please be collaborative and discuss everyone together. Okay, so today we're going to talk about the electric field. But before we get there, we've got a couple more problems about charges and forces. So your first catalytic question is here. Please take a look at this, think about it by yourself and click in with your answer. We're going to do a revoke on this one. So your device should tell you who to talk to. Please hear that person, tell them what you got and why, and then click in once you come to the consensus. I saw here, when I saw here, it's a shift to the answer B. So we've got a majority on B now. How come? So as these charges are moving further away from each other up here, the horizontal vectors are kind of canceling out so there's less force. And that's exactly what's going on here. So slightly spread out to the side. The net force from those will be weaker because they're not pushing directly up. So an alternate way to think about this, we can draw the vectors also. So if we have a vector, we can draw the vector from the 3Q charge at the top. It might be a vector pointing straight down like this. That's the direction of the force. Or it's the ones from the bottom. You get a vector straight up from the charge in the middle. And then you get a vector in this direction from the charge on the right, one in this direction from the charge on the left. So when you add those three vectors together, the net force in the out direction is going to be less than the force coming from the charge 3Q at the top. So C is the answer here. Are there any questions about these two problems? So Michael Farage is a really interesting character in the history of physics. So he actually didn't go to school for very long. I believe he was kicked out of school when the teachers thought he was down or something like that. So he didn't go to school for very long at all. He worked as a bookbinder's assistant. So during the day he'd buy books. And at night he'd read books and he became very inspired by science. So eventually he got a grade as an assistant to a scientist. And from there he started being able to do experiments with electricity and magnetism. And so he came up with this concept of the electric and magnetic fields. Now people didn't really take it seriously because he didn't have the mathematical background to be able to really nail down what these fields were. So it wasn't until 20 or 30 years later when Maxwell came along and figured out the mathematics that people took it seriously. But Faraday was a scientist and he was almost on the level of Newton and Einstein in terms of the discoveries they made. So this is one picture of Faraday. He looked pretty distinguished there. Here's another picture of him. So this is him. This is an animation picture that I took from Cosmos, Neil deGrasse Tyson Cosmos down here. So I just want to put in a little plug for that. I'm interested in science stories and things like that, which I really enjoyed this episode. You can learn a little bit more about Michael Faraday there. So that's on Netflix, if you have Netflix, any interest. How do you know there's an electric field in space somewhere? Well, you can tell if there's an electric field by the force that it exerts on a charge. Well, there's no electric field in this room. You bring a charge into this room and measure if there's a force on it. Your next question here gives you a little bit of practice with this definition of the electric field. So please take a moment to read that and answer it. In case it's not clear, this charge here is three corals. This one is two corals. And this is the one coral charge. We've got a majority. We've got a majority on two mutants, which is the correct answer here. I'll give you guys practice with this unit vector thing. So on your worksheet here, we've got a question.  So please go to your worksheet now. Draw what you've got on there. We'll look at it in a moment. It's a bit of a mess. A bit of a mess. Would anybody like to, you know, maybe tell me what would they actually do? And why? So it looks like there's a lot of arrows going out or in or something. Can anyone be a little more precise all of it? So back there. What you need to do your vector is pointing away because the unit radio vector always points away. And you feel it can be different from the unit vector. Do we have a green? Or anybody who disagrees with that? Did anybody get something that looks like this? See some hands. Why like this? What's your name? Be like this because when you're looking at a charge, you use a proton or a positive charge as a test part. Powering on, let's talk about some electric fields. So I've got your next catalytic question here. Please take a look at it. Answer it by yourself. Another good majority here is on, is for D. And so again, this is just practice adding up vectors together and trying to see what will result from that. So awesome. So we've got some practice doing this vector addition sort of qualitatively and trying to figure out what we expect the electric field to do. So in your next problem, we're going to get a little more quantitative about it.  So can someone tell me what direction the electric field at point A is due to charge 3 this 5-nanofilum charge will be. What direction will that electric field be? So next up, we'll need to calculate the vector electric field due to the other point charges 2 and 3. We're not going to have time to do that in class today. So I'm going to ask you to finish that for homework. I'm going to post the solution online in the slides within the next hour or so to go on there and check. But this is a very good practice question, especially for your quiz coming up on Wednesday. So please make sure it's nice and timely.


What's up everyone it's your girl Kenzie here from Layton Sports Cards and I am repping 2022 top scroll baseball hobby and jumbo four box mixer number two random teams again here's a look at the random results you can always find these at LaytonSportsCards.com underneath the results tab and the link is also in chat for you best of luck everybody here we go again next break is sold out looking to fill up Chronicles basketball number 13 hot Celtics Hornets Mavs T-Wolf Sixers majority of those are on sale so let's get them filled up here we go gonna be just a little bit behind we'll catch up here eventually though for sure but keep selling these breaks out we appreciate everyone for getting these tops chrome filled up thank you thank you here we go Jack Laherty Refractor you Darvish can you see for said that tell is like a four four figure car that's awesome Jacob DeGrom on the pinstripe Eli Morgan and that's raw too which is insane you imagine grain not in it gemming or getting at least a nine Prism Brian Anderson Bruhan happy bias refractor yeah everyone baseball filled up for tonight still spots left in the new release of Chronicles basketball we've got Yankees Louis skill on the rookie negative there you go Yankees nice hit there rookie negative Nelson Cruz hope everyone's having a fantastic Thursday almost the weekends so that's fun actually have a whole weekend off I don't think I've had that since I started here like days are just you like usually work like every other day or something like that which is scheduled this week it's like wonky for everybody so actually have a whole weekend off part of the city Joey Vada surprise birthday party so that should be fun nice Prism Mookie Betts Pete Alonso filled with Jamaican so that means good food and big party oh yeah never party with Jamaicans they definitely recommend it Contreras refractor definitely looking forward to some of that food oh my gosh we've got Ronnie Dawson rookie auto for the Astros Hellenic boba shet bluebomb ambergy got Cody Belanger and like the theme of it it's for his aunt is like Jamaica childhood we've got blue rookie of Stuart Fairchild for the D-backs 128 out of 150 so I found this shirt on amazon it says my husband is Jamaican nothing scares me it says my shirt I'm gonna be wearing at the party Prism Zach Wheeler that's good I like I didn't tell Ross I'm gonna see his reaction when I put that shirt on he's gonna laugh Dylan Carlson John Lester refractor I got him a shirt that says Yaman Yaman 87 Mickey Cabrera Vladdy Jr. Jay Martinez refractor Cody Belanger Prism Stuart Fairchild rookie D-backs Vladdy Guerrero Jr. Castro still six teams left in the first Chronicles half case everyone again majority of those teams are on sale mark down let's get that filled up Alex Wells rookie auto for the Orioles let's get those filled up a heart of the city J-Ram springer all right that will do it for the first hobby box hobby numeral dose two shortcrack refractor grism wonder franco rookie base got pinstripe yadding Molina got prism Harrison Bader batter Bader heart of the city Tim Anderson we've got refractor Longoria Longoria Jesse Winker gross Traris Swanson come on let's see some color oh i see some shame boss we've got to 350 cabrion Hayes on the magenta speckle pirates go prism Aaron Ashby rookie Jill Ryan rookie refractor Casey Mice we've got pirates Ronzie Contreras rookie auto pirates starting to heat up here Joey Gallo base 87 Kristen Yellich Bobby Dalbic Shohei Tyler Gilbert on the rookie refractor D-backs Woodruff second half Stakas Mike Trout yeah everyone six teams left on the first Chronicles basketball break of the night we've got purple speckle brin and Woodruff 27 of 2.99 brewers two autos per box on average there some big hip potential with those beautiful cornerstone autos when you cruise base we've got Steven Strasburg prism Brian De La Cruz um the gold standard is in that Chronicles as well we pulled a cave redemption gold standard last night Mike Trout's short print there so another um mixer with um 10 plus autos coming out of it 12 coming out of that one 14 coming out of this one so lots of autos to be had tonight uh Wanderfranko 87 rookie John Means Wanderfranko on the new classics raise refractor Grossman and Crawford future stars Jordan prism rookie Jake Meyer for the Astros Reynolds O'Neill Cruz rookie refractor a nice one there pirates India two packs left oh we got orange orange rookie Mike Zunino for the raise that is 20 of 25 nice orange there raise doing well too Josh loud rookie and last pack last pack of the hobby Otani on the 87 and Justin Turner all right jumbo time autos per box coming out so still looking for 10 total autos here we go 10 total autos though we've got heart of the city Freddie Freeman Vado Astros rookie Otto Ronnie Dawson Brandon Lauer refractor one Soto new classics prism of Chris sale refractor Corey seager still 16 left in the first chronicles everyone we've got immaculate baseball up next and then after that we will get into basketball six teams on sale six teams remain majority on sale let's get that filled up grant me fair child we got pinched strike George Springer Jacob DeGrom and Tyler Stevenson refractor Celtics Hornets Mavs T-Wolves and Sixer still good teams for sure Lanza we've got Shaz McCormick on the rookie prism blue Otto Michael Brantley for the Astros 21 out of 150 Stroze darling Marte refractor part of the city Joey Vado Tim Anderson refractor Charlie Blackman Astros another team that hits quite often in this for sure yeah like four three or four rookies and a couple of vets yeah at least two vets for sure and then the Marlins usually yeah we've got magenta Trista Mackenzie for the Guardians that is 75 of 399 Prism Chris Bryant Freddie Peralta Otto for the Burrers and Brian Reynolds refractor sub turbo sub turbo how's it going how does the game start 815 820 yeah 830 probably 815 that sounds real that sounds legit blue Bob future stars kronoworth Shohei Otani 87 refractor Nico Horner you know I haven't as we've got Tristan Mackenzie prism and rookie refractor Tyler McGill Mets Tana got Shohei Otani pinstripe uh heart of the city that is gold 3450 Tim Anderson white socks there you go four for four on the gold yeah four for four four breaks four gold so far Wanda Franco on the rookie race uh purple rookie Otto Spencer Watkins for the Orioles that is 46 of 250 Jonathan India refractor four for four and that sounds good Wendy's four for four oh yeah all right myself hungry here prism of Kyle Lewis and refractor rookie Josh Lowe race like it's totally for lunch they were out of steak they were out of pico it's like dude what the heck are you doing with your lives like so annoying you know you're about to have a lunch rush and you don't have anything cabrini's green wave Nolan Aronato Cardinals that is 18 out of 99 Jose Braille you trade Turner last pack of the first jumbo got one more jumbo to go five teams left nice prism Jose Berrios uh Alec Wells on the rookie Otto Orioles and Catelle Marta on the refractor we've got Immaculate after this and then starting into some basketball still five left all basketball it's going to be half cases pick your team of the new release yesterday Chronicles basketball all pick your team formats majority of the teams left and each one of those breaks are also on sale so check that out we've got Prism Anthony Rendon and Alexander Wells on the rookie refractor and after basketball we got football for the rest of the night very nice lineup ending the night with some flawless a full case of flawless tiered random teams still spots off the not one too so fun fun way to end end the night heart of the city Max Muncie Rohan on the 87 rookie blue rookie Otto Jonah Don for the Nationals that is 123 of 150 you go on the blue Otto Xander Bogart's refractor so plenty of room for personals as well still don't believe we have anything in queue so order now you'll be one of the very first if not the first ticket ears ripped on your cruise base rookie overshad we've got purple speckle bobby doll back for the red socks 64 of 299 on that prism Tapia and Stephen Strasburg refractor got another orange coming up here Rosarino we've got Kyle Lewis on the negative for the Mariners prism of Evan Longoria orange wave Rockies rookie Otto Coleman Welker 6 of 25 Rockies staying hot in this product very nice hit Rockies uh Stephen B there you go Stephen Josiah Gray on the rookie refractor new far rookie base part of the city Maggie Cabrera 87 Jesse Winker refractor Josh Donaldson real brand it's been crazy since you hopped in chat prison for the Tigers Robbie Grossman Grossman uh rookie Otto Royce Lewis twins and refractor Tray Mancini Adams future Stearns boba shut O'Neal Cruz that's a short print O'Neal Cruz wow there you go pirates on the refractor rookie short print it's is Jeffrey H. there you go Jeffrey heck yeah very nice hard 128 yeah that's the base super short print yeah wow we will mag this one for you Grats on that one Jeffrey we pulled a short print out of the last mixer too right for the Yankees or is it negative never mind Gavin Sheets rookie 87 Corbin Burns thinking it was it was backwards that's why I was thinking that was nice Patrick thanks for hopping in we pull you some like a nice numbered Lucas and stuff Lottie Jr we've got Walker Bueller on the prism and Freddy Freeman refractor Warner Franco rookie base pinch drive Shane Bieber Mike Trout 87 rookie Otto Kevin Smith for the Blue Jays refractor Trevor Lorneck so what is that down to four then three now three teams left nice three left in the very first basketball break of the night and those are all Chronicles basketball half case pick your team formats future stars Carlson Freddy Freeman Tray Turner couple packs left and we will do a recap just the Lucas show hey it's not a bad thing put a couple um Brunson autos too yesterday prism Reese Hoskins rookie Otto TJ Fridl for the Reds and Mike Trout refractor um did you order a baseball personal or uh just a personal I'm doing group breaks until midnight eastern so if you ordered a personal it won't rip until then don't castra got pinstripe one Soto Christian Yellich and a Shohei Otani refractor awesome Arthur best of luck thank you all for uh filling those breaks up let's do a quick recap here we had the TJ Fridl Reds Kevin Smith Blue Jays Royce Lewis twins the orange Colton Welker for the Rockies six of 25 blue rookie Otto of Joan Adon for the Nationals 123-150 Alec Wells Orioles purple rookie Otto Orioles Spencer Watkins 46-250 Freddy Peralta Brewers blue Otto Michael Brantley Astros 21 of 150 Ronnie Dawson Astros Mike Zunino for the Rays on the Orange 20 of 25 Ronzie Contreras pirates Alex Wells Orioles Ronnie Dawson Astros and we had the base super short print variation of O'Neill Cruz rookie heck of a hit there for you Jeffrey congrats again thanks so much um we've got a macula baseball coming right up


Hi kids! Welcome back for our last episode of Online Safety with Sango! I am Sango and today we will be talking about how to watch videos online while staying safe. Online platforms allow you to watch series, movies and videos at any time of day. But many online platforms like YouTube for instance are for kids older than you. Why is that? When you watch a video, additional text or pictures can sometimes appear on your screen. We call these advertisements or ads. Some ads might not be suitable for your age or some may try to trick you. They may promise you that you want to pride or that you could earn real money. Scammers are people who try and trick you online. Scammers will try to find ways to get very important information from you like your email address, home address and phone number to send messages to you that you should not receive or they might try to call you. Luckily kids can use age-appropriate online platforms. This means platforms that are made for kids your age. For example YouTube Kids which is free or Netflix Kids and Disney Plus now which are paid platforms so you would need to get your parents help for this. Depending on where you live you may have heard of different platforms for kids such as Z5 Kids, Nickelodeon, PBS Kids or Deti Tochka Ibi. Ask an adult to help you get access to the online platform on the device you usually use. Did you know that even gaming consoles like PlayStation and Xbox can connect to the internet and allow you to watch movies and TV series? For this reason we must use gaming consoles with the same rules as we use online platforms. This is also the case for smartphones, tablets and other connected devices like smart watches or connected toys. Let's sum up what we have learned today. Some online platforms and their content are unsuitable for kids your age and can cause you harm. Always use age-appropriate online platforms for kids like you and always ask a trusted adult to help you access the online platform. If you use gaming consoles or other devices connected to the internet remember to use them with the same rules as other online platforms. All clear now? There is so much more to learn and experience together in the online world. So let's meet again soon for more fun learning on online safety with Sango. Until then stay safe, stay tuned and have fun online.