What we have to do today is we have to do geometrical patterns and in in geometrical patterns as you can see the first question the first question tells me that account the number of squares in in the given figure now how do we solve this kind of question So basic idea about this kind of question is that we have to identify number of geometrical patterns like squares in the given combined square so a bigger number would be given to you and sorry a bigger figure would be given to you and what we will do is in that particular big figure we will identify we will identify how many squares are there how many rectangles are there depending on what question is telling us to do so in this particular case what happens is that let me identify a small question for you ok I give you question number I give you question number 4 without telling anything try to solve question number 4 and try to give me answer for question number 4 ok if you are saying b if you are saying d if you are saying some other answer the problem is nobody asks me how to solve this kind of questions and I also didn't tell it now I am asking a few questions I would like you to give me an answer about that how did you count it how many of you counted the number of triangles and squares without naming the vertices here there are many vertices how many of you just type this answer in the chat box how many of you tried to count out the number of triangles and the number of squares without writing the names of the vertices and by writing the names I mean a b c d e f g h likewise whoever has written I did like that has also given me I don't know the name because the name has been given as irrational good if you have done by naming the vertices that's that's a right option to do it if you have not named the vertices that's not a right version to do it so try to understand how I will solve the question so to solve this question what I will do is I will start marking suppose this is a this is b this is c this is d this is e this is f this is g this is h so to do this kind of question you always have to mark the vertices after marking the I have not marked three vertices here so so this g h this is i this is j this is k and this is l so I have marked several vertices over here now you have to calculate how many triangles are there and how many squares are there so if I calculate triangles calculate the number of triangles starting with a so you find that adj is a triangle you also find that you also find that adf is a triangle so you write like this adj you write adf similarly one triangle here first calculate the smaller triangle so one two three four five six seven eight nine so you can write like this what you will you will do is you will write the names of the smaller triangles you will have better idea now how many triangles you are leaving here you are leaving one two three so twelve triangles you are leaving here and then you will go for the bigger triangle so what is the bigger triangle adf is a bigger triangle now if you look at this square the square is something like this so I have to calculate how many triangles sorry circles are there so what I have named this I have named this di e I have named this j f l and I have named this g k h now how many triangles are there so if I start writing the names of the triangle the number of triangles would be if I look at this half in this half the number of triangles would be one two three four then a bigger triangle this five now if I look at this half one two three four so eight a bigger triangle this so ten five here five there ten then this triangle will be taken so eleven this triangle would be taken so twelve and this is f so what I am writing here name would be j g f is one triangle g f k is another triangle f k h is another triangle and f l h is another triangle then this bigger triangle which is g f h similarly on the other side I have let me write here let me write here this is d j d f then d i f then i f e then f e l and then I have this bigger triangle which is d f e so five here five here ten then I have this triangle for this triangle I am writing here d f g then I have this triangle which is e f h so how many triangles here I have twelve triangles here and is there any other triangle which I am missing out so likewise how many triangles I have here so if I include this I have written here a d z a d f now I will have triangle from this side I will have triangle l e c and I will have triangle the bigger triangle here which will be e f c what I am trying to do is what I am trying to show you over here is that how do you count the triangles and to count the triangles what I do is first I find out the square the procedure is first I have taken the square in that square I have tried to identify how many different triangles are there I got different triangles as twelve here five here five here and two here so I got different triangles as twelve years now what I do is I will try to find out triangles with the help of different lines of a square so one triangle is here so till now I have identified twelve here one here and the second one is here and the third one with a and this is this is the third one so three here then what I do one here second here and third here so three here then this triangle is one this triangle is one and then the complete triangle is one so nine here twelve plus nine is twenty eight now what I will do is I will in this particular square I did not take four triangles the four triangles would be one which I write here G B D plus then what you do is you take from this side which is D E F then what you do is so twelve plus nine twenty one twenty three I have identified the triangle is getting bifurcated so this particular triangle itself remains a triangle so that becomes nearly twenty five now what happens is in this particular square let me it's just muddled up now let me just clear the idea for you because everything is getting muddled up so what happens is first I draw this square in this square I found out twelve particular triangles then from the triangle itself there would be two components which will be suppose I name this I name this B and I name this O I name this let me name it C B E G H K F J so what happens is twelve twelve simple triangles would be as I told you this this side this side this side what I have already told you so there would be twelve simple triangles now from one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve so twelve simple triangles like this now what happens is if I start taking two components of the triangle so if I take two components of the triangle one component here two two components here three component here four component here so that becomes for one component here one component here one component here that becomes three seven now what happens is one component here one component here that becomes nine so twelve plus nine is how much twenty one now triangles which are made of four of four components. So four components is IBD, one component here. The second one is BDG, the third component is DGI, fourth component is GIB. So GIB, then fifth component is ACO, the sixth component is COE, so six components from another place. So 12 plus 9 is 21, 21 plus 6 is 27 and one bigger scale which is ACE, so one scale here. So you get how much? You get 27 plus 1, 28 triangles. Now let me calculate squares for you. If you are not understanding, let me know. I repeat it once again for you. Don't worry if you are not getting these kind of problems. If possible, we will do only one type of question which is geometrical patterns because this is very very important. You will get at least two questions from here. So if you are not getting it, please let me know. Suppose this is B, this is K, this is D, this is J, this is O, this is F, this is I, this is H, this is J. So what I get is two components, squares having two components are B, K, O, J, then K, O, B, F, this is half-half. So this is one, this is two, this is three, this is four. So J, O, I, H, and F, O, H, G. So these are the four squares that you have in the half components. The other square which is difficult to find out over here is that square is try to understand. If you look at here, if I remove everything here, one square is B, D, G, I which is visible here. So most of the people will write five squares. The one square which is difficult to find out over here is, you look at this, this if I mark as C, this as B, this as D, and this as O, this particular square is very difficult to find it out over here. Look at what I am doing on the screen and where I am finding out the square. So this particular square C, D, O, B makes my sixth square. So the answer would be D over here. So this is how we have to solve the question. I will give one more question and let's do the first question now. All of you, let's do the first question now. If you are not understanding, let me know. I will repeat once again. See, I was not looking at the chat. It doesn't matter whether it was 30. How do you count 30? Okay, let me solve this first question for you because most of you have given me the answer. Now let me mark it. So this is A, this is B, this is C, this is D, this is E, this is F, G, H, I, J, this is K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y. Suppose something like this. Now I have marked everything. Now the first thing that I always do is my approach is that if I start counting the components, most of the time I forget to add the bigger square. So my first thing to do is I write the bigger square at the first. So I write A, E, Y, U as the first square so that I don't forget about it. Second approach is then going into component. If I get into component 1, 2, 3, component means see this particular square has been separated into three or separated into different numbers of a square by various lines. So try to understand the square is formed by separation of one line. What do I mean by separation of one line? So this line BG here and FG here. Similarly, with BG you have one more separation which is CH. If you move to CH, there is one more separation which is DI. If you move to DI, there is one more separation into EJ. So this is in column direction or in vertical direction. In horizontal direction, if you look at AB, the next separation is FG. If you move to FG, the next separation is KL and likewise. So this is called one component. So by one component, I am getting 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. So I am not writing names of all because I started writing names of everything in the last question and it became muddled up all the way. So one component, you have 16 squares. One component means it is made by lines which are adjacent to each other. So you look AB, FG are adjacent to each other. Now I will remove this adjacent line both vertically and horizontally. So how many squares I am getting? Now I will write the names. So third, made with four components. So why four components? 1, 2, 3, 4. These four components give me one particular square. So what is the name? ACMK is first one. Then what I do? This particular line I shift here. I will not take this adjacent one. I take this one. So the second one is BDNL. I will not take this one. I will go here which is C E O M. So three here, you should understand that three lines together. One, two, two lines are fixed and one line from this side, one, two, three, are giving me three particular squares. So what I do? I will keep this line as it is. Instead of this line, now I will take this line, then I will take this line. So how many squares we will have? I will have three into three nine squares I will have. If you want me to write names of all nine squares, if you are not understanding, please write it in the chat box. I'll write it. Then I will take squares with nine components. So you should understand that one component, two component, nine component, how this is going? This is one square, sorry, four components. So this is two square. This is three square. So what is happening? Nine component means one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. So how many squares will I get? I will get four squares like this. So nine component, this I can write it for you. It is ADSP. This is the first one. The second one is BE. What is this? This is T. So BETP is the second one. Now let me go here. So you will have F, I, X, U and the fourth one. I'm writing here it would be GJYV. So four here. So 16 here, nine here, four here. So 16 plus nine plus four. So with one component I have taken, with four components I have taken, with nine components I have taken. After nine, one square, two square, three square, what is left out? Four square. Four square is equal to 16, which I'm getting here. So that's how you come to know that whether you are left out with any square or not. So 16 plus nine plus four plus one, how much it is, it comes out to be 30. So how much you get? You get 30. So 30 is the right answer. Now let me go to another question. So solve question number two. Dan, you are giving me nine, few are giving me, Shethish is giving me 9, 9, 9, 9, 7, 9, 11 different answers. Okay, let me wait for this. Let me wait for this. I give you two more minutes to answer. Okay, still the same story, 9, 11, 9, 11 going on. Let me solve this question for you. So what will I do? I'll start marking it. So this is A, this is B, this is C, this is D, this is E, this is F, this is G, this is H. I don't think I have left any particular edge for you. Now what do I have to calculate? Quadrilaterals. Quadrilaterals require how many different edges or how many different sides? Four. So I have to calculate something where four sides are there. So try to understand how I do it. Try always start from marking those quadrilaterals, which are very, very obvious in nature. So you look at here, there is a trapezium here, almost looks like a trapezium, A, B, C, D. So the first and the most obvious one which looks in front of me is A, B, C, D. Obviously A, B, C, D, opposite to it would be A, D, E, F. This was the most obvious one which I marked, which I marked. Now look at here, there is a rectangle made over here which is looking very, very obvious, which is A, B, D, E. So I have written A, B, D, E. Now if I have written A, B, D, E, why not instead of going from D to E, there is a direct line going from D to F. So it means that it makes the quadrilateral. So this was my third one. The fourth one is A, B, D remain same, but from D there are two lines. So D I have written, now I write D, F. Now if I make, if I saw A, B, D, F, you come, you know that this D, F has two parts. So if you start from D, you can go till F. If you start from D, you can stop at H also. So instead of writing A, B, D, F, I can also write A, B, D, H. So this is the fifth one. The exact story from the other side, from the different side. So I will write C, D, H, A. So sixth one would be C, D, H, A. Instead of writing C, D, H, A, I can write C, D. Instead of stopping at H, I can go till F. I can write it C, D, F, A. Now from D there are two lines. So D, F and D, E, I have only taken D, F. So I will write eighth one as C, D, E, A. This is my eighth one. Now let me stop from, I started from A, then B was included. Then I went to C. Let me start from D. So if I start from D, I have ninth one as D, E, A, G. So D, E, A, G, tenth one as D, E, A, D, E, A, C, D, E, A, C. So D, E, A, C. Is D, E, A, C included anywhere? No. So these are the three things. The next one can be D, E or sorry, the next one can be, next one can be D, E, A, F which I have written over here. So how many I have written? I have written 10. Eleventh one can be D, H, A, G. So D, H, A, G, the middle one. So there are how many quadrilaterals I have added? I have added 11 quadrilaterals. This is the answer for me. Now solve question number three. Was there something repeated? I am looking at here. What was repeated? You are saying D, E, A, C was repeated. Okay. I look at it at the end of the class. Don't worry. How many of you are done with this? Let me check. Somebody is saying C, somebody is saying D, somebody is, most of you are saying C, D. Okay. Most of you are saying C, D. So C is the right answer here. So let me solve this question for you. And by marking different things, this is A, this is B. Let me start marking it from somewhere else. Let me mark it with a different color altogether. So that A, B, C, D, E, F. Now what do I do? G, H, I, J, K, L, then these ones. M, N, O, P. So marking is done. Now again, in this kind of question, the concept of components come. So if I talk about components, I will start with most obvious one. And the most obvious ones are generally made with the lines which are adjacent to each other. So one, two, three, one, two, three. So how many of them? Two on the, one on the top, one on the bottom. So how much you get? Two here. The top one is, I'm just, I'm not writing, but I'm naming it B, C, D and A, E, F. These are the two one, these are the two. So two I have written here. Now 16 inside. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. So two plus 16 with one component, I'm getting 18 different. So how many components? One component or this is simplest triangles. So how much do I get? I get 18. Now, if I take any one of them, now concept of triangle is gone in top and bottom. I'm not making anything from this top and bottom anymore. So the concept of triangle will come only in, only in this small square. So let me make one square for you and let me check how many different triangles do I make. So I'm naming it once again B, G, H, A and M. So how many triangles do I have here? Try to understand. I will, I have already made these small triangles. So I will not take adjacent lines. You look at here, I will take the first one that I write is A, B, G. This is the first one. The second one that I write is, I have started from this particular vertex. I'll keep on shifting one vertex anti-clockwise. So A, B, G, now I'm starting here. B, G, H, this is a different triangle. So B also covered. Let me go to G. So G, H, A is a different triangle and let me go to fourth. H, A, B is altogether a different triangle. So how many of them I'm getting here? I'm getting four different triangles and I have four such squares. So this is square number one then two then or rectangle number one, two, three, four. So in first rectangle, I got four different triangles like this. If I have four different rectangles, so four into four, 16 I'll get. So 18 simplest triangle I got, 16 I got with the help of two components. Two components means one plus two two components added. So I'm adding this component and this component. Here I'm adding this component and this component. Now can I get, by adding three components, one, two, three, you know, you cannot get different triangles but by adding four components you can get it. So you look at here from, I'm making it here. It's like this. So it's something like this and what is this? This is A, this is B, this is G, H, this is I, J and if you look at this, this is one particular this. So I'm adding one, two, three, four, four components here and I'm getting A, G, J as one of my triangles and one is exactly opposite to it. So you look at here A, G, J is one such triangle. So one, two and three triangles upwards and three triangles downwards. So how much I'm getting here? Six. So 18 plus 16 is 34. So 18 plus 16 plus 6 is equal to how much? It is 40. So I'm getting 40 triangles over here and let me go to squares. Now how many squares? So try to understand, let me read the question. Okay. So to do this question, we have to assume that these, these lengths are same. So one square is this, this is B, this is G, this is H, this is A. So B, G, H, A is one triangle and I have four, sorry, one square. So I have into four, so I have four such squares. Where are other squares? So other squares are, you look at here, this I named as M, this I named as H, this is N. So other squares are here, M, G, H and N. This is A, this is H. So M, G, H, N, then one square is here, this is the second square and this is the third square. So four squares, I have counted this vertically and four squares like this. So four plus three, how many squares here? Seven squares. So answer is C, which is 40 triangles and seven squares. So question number four, we have already done. Now we'll solve question number five or we'll not solve question number five. We'll solve question number nine now. Okay. I've started getting answers of this question. Most of you, when you're writing answer, please write the question number also so that I can identify which question you are answering. So people are saying B, few people are saying D, B, D, everything is going on over here. What do I have to find out? I have to find out triangles and parallelograms. Okay, let me solve this question for you. A lot of time. Let me mark it. So this is A, B, C, D, E, F, G, then this is H, I, J, K, then this is L, this is M, this is N, and this is O. So I hope I have marked all the yes, I have marked everything. Nothing is left out. So if I have to identify triangles, I will always start with the simplest one. How many simplest triangles you can find it out? So simplest triangles would be K, J, N, and K, J, O. So K, J, N, let me write here because the maximum number is 21, so should not go beyond, we can write it, K, J, O. Then where do you find the other one? The other one is C, N, B, these are the ones difficult to identify. So C, N, B, and then you have on the other side O, E, F. So O, E, F. Then you have here J, I, L, and then you have J, I, M. And after J, I, L, and J, I, M, you have smaller ones, B, L, A, similar ones as this C, N, B, N, O, E, F, B, L, A, and M, F, G. So M, F, G. So how many of them I got? I got eight of them. So this was triangle form single component. From two components, how many of them I am getting? So from two components, I will have one component here, C, D, J, this vertical one, so C, D, J. And on the other side, I have E, D, J. Similarly, N, K, O, joining these two components. So N, K, O, then I have here J, L, M. Then I have the below one, J, A, H. So as I write J, H, you could have identified the other part also, which is J, H, G. So how many of them I have? Six components I have here. Then, so with one component I had with two components I have, can I do it with three components? So by three components, I mean one, then two, and then three. So B, K, I looks out to be one particular triangle. So by three components, I have B, K, I. Then I have K, I, F. Then I have from the other side. So from here, so I can have triangles such as C, J, A from this side. So C, J, A. And on the other side, I have J, E, G. So three components, J, E, G. So four of them. With four components, can I have one? So if you look at the bigger one, so one, I have never counted this. One, two, three, four. So with four components, I have C, D, E. And I have here A, J, G. So A, J, G. So four here and two here. 8 plus 6, 14, 14 plus 4, 18, 18 plus 2, 20. And the biggest triangle that I never took was one, two, three, four, five, six. With six components, I have B, K, F. So this is one of them. So maximum how much I'm getting here? I'm not ticking here. I'm getting 21. I have not counted the parallelogram. So 21 is the right number of triangles. I hope you all understood it. Now I'll have to mark it once again because I have made everything A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O. Now for parallelograms, what I do? For parallelograms, one component will never give me parallelograms, so two components. So let me start from here. You look at here one, two, three, four. So C, D, K, B is giving me one parallelogram. Similarly on the other side, D, K, O, E is giving me, no, not D, D, K, E, F is giving me once again. Just D, K, F, E is giving me. Then where am I getting? I'm getting B, I, H, A. So I'm getting here B, I, H, A. And similarly I, F, H, G. So I'm getting I, F, G, H or H, G, whatever you say. So how many of them I'm getting it? Four. Similarly I can get it with B, K, J, A with three components, one, two, three. So on the other side, so B, K, J, A is one. Similarly K, F, J, G is the other one. Similarly C, J, I, B is the third one. C, J, I, B is the third one. And the fourth one would be J, E, F, I. So how many of them I'm getting here? Four one. So these are with three components. With four components, how many of them I'm getting? So with four components, one, two, so I will get B, F, one, two, three, four. So I will get B, F, G, A. I will only get one with four components. Now there are other parallelograms also which are they, these parallelograms are, if you look at it very carefully, the parallelograms are like this. This line, this line, this line, and this line. So how many components? There are one, two, three, four, five, five components. So with five components I am getting C, D, J, A on one side. So on other side also I'll get, which will be D, E, G, J. Then if you start from here, you will get C, J, H, A, C, J, H, A and J, E, G, H. So how many of them you are getting? Four you are getting. And then you have two more left out, which is C, E, F, B. So, sorry, you have four more, two more left out, which is C, E, F, B. How many components here? One, two, three, four, five, six, with six components. So you have with six components one, one of them here. And then you have C, E, G, A. So C, E, G, A, which has one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, ten components. So one of them here. So how many of them? Four, four, eight. And have I left anything else? So I have left N, J, L, B. Okay, I have left this, these two I have left here. So one and two here. So N, J, L, B is one of them. And then N, O, M, I is one of them. So two more here. So these are the direct ones which I left here.  How many of them I get? I get 17. So 21 and 17, this is the right answer. Okay, so we have done enough questions like this. I'll post this sheet on the WhatsApp group. You can solve questions on this basis. Now let me move to another particular topic which is seating arrangements. So this is the first question. One thing that you need to make clear in your mind is in seating arrangement, what happens is you have to look at the direction in which the objects are facing. Why? Because always it would be written that A is sitting right to B, B is sitting left of C. How does the direction in which the objects are facing matters is like this. Suppose if they are facing on north side, so if I say that A is sitting left of B, I'll first mark B and if the person is facing this side, left would be this side and right would be this side. So A has to go somewhere here. But on the very opposite, if somebody is facing south, so in that particular case, what happens is I say that A is sitting left of B and somebody is facing this side, left becomes this side. So A would be sitting here. So you always have to look at the case where the direction of, I mean direction in which objects are facing are identified by you. Always remember if no direction is being talked about in the question, like if the question doesn't tell that in which direction objects are facing, the default direction is north direction. If in the question you are not able to find out or the question does not specify explicitly that which direction the objects are facing and again repeating, you have to assume that the objects are facing north direction. But if in any question it has been given to you that the objects are facing east direction, then you have to apply that particular concept. So if somebody is facing east, this is my east. So this becomes my left and this becomes my right. So if B is sitting here, A would be somewhere here and likewise. So that's how you have to focus on seating arrangement questions. Now if there is any extra thing, I'll help you out in the question. So this is the first question of seating arrangement. First read the question and then try to solve the questions. Oh, let me solve this question for you. Enough time. So what happens is, how many people are there? A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H are sitting in two lines facing each other. Okay. Let me make two lines facing each other. These are the two lines in which eight people are sitting together. Each line has four persons. A is sitting between G and F and facing towards north. So this side is facing towards north and this side is facing towards south. So what has been told to me? So it has been written in the question itself that A is sitting between G and F facing towards north, opposite to C. So who is sitting opposite or exactly facing C is A option would be D option. So A would be here somewhere sitting between G and F. So two options A, G and F on this side or G and F on this side. Now if G and F has been given, don't only take that G can be on left hand side and F can be on right hand side. It has not been given clearly. That's why I'm making two different conditions. On the other side, look at here opposite to C. Here is C and there are two conditions here B and D or D and B. Now try to understand H is on the right hand side of D. So if I make three people sit like this, H would be either here or H would be here. So if I keep H here and I keep D here, D becomes left of H. H is just right of once again. I'm just getting one second. H is not here. H is somewhere here. So H is just on the right of G. So H would be here. So I'm just writing it down. So it would be like this once again. This I misread it. So if H is on the right of G, H would be here. So my final answer would be on this side, it will be F, A, G, H. This is something like this and C is sitting between D and B. Here, you don't know whether B is sitting on the right of D or D is sitting on the right of B. So answer would be B or D. You don't know here. Option would be D option here. Now the next one is in which pair of the following second person is sitting at the left of the first person. So if I take F, A, A is on the right of F. That's a wrong answer. G, A is the right answer because on the left of G, this G is the right answer. Now let me go to question number four and let me solve it for you. So question number four tells me who is facing north. So you know that in facing north, C is not there, B is not there, E is not there. Only H is facing north because G, F facing north if you look at here, F, A, G, H are facing north. Only one option is there, which is H and question number five is in which of the following pairs C. So if you look at here, if you identify D on the side, there should be one option here, none of these because what he is doing in this question is that he is taking the question as it is. If he is saying C is sitting between D and G, he is assuming D to be here and B to be here, which is not the right case, even if it has been written in the solution of this and as B is sitting here, it has been told that B is sitting opposite to G. But from my experience, this is absolutely wrong. You have to take two cases. So you always have to take two cases. If none of these is not there as in this case, then you can assume that D is here and B is here. So if none of these option is not here, then I am assuming that D is here and B is here. So B and G would be opposite. Then in second question, you will have to say that D is sitting on the right of C, but this is not a right logic to do it. You always have to make two different scenarios. So these are the questions. Now, similarly, you can solve question number six. That's not a problem. Once it has been identified that what needs to be done, you can do question number two. Now solve this question. Question number seven to 11. So okay, I am getting a lot of answers. Seven, eight, nine. I am getting here. Okay. Okay. So a lot of people have given me answers for seven, eight, nine. Now let me solve question number seven, eight, nine for you. Five girls are sitting on a bench to be photographed. Seema is to the left of Rani and to the right of Vindu. Mary is to the right of Rani. Rita is between Rani and Mary. Very, very simple question. No information has been given in which direction they have been facing. So I will assume that they are facing north. Seema is to the left of Rani. So if this is Rani, this is left, this is right. So I will write here Rani. Then Seema would be on her left and to the right of Vindu. So here is Vindu. Rita is between Rani and Mary. So here is Rita and here is Mary. Because I cannot put Rita somewhere here because already Seema and other other. So who is sitting immediate to the right of Rita, immediate to the right of Rita, Mary is sitting. Question eight, who is second from the left? So from the left is this side. So Seema is second from the left. So option is D. Now question number nine, what's the answer? Question number nine tells me who is in the middle of the photograph. Rani is in the middle of the photograph. Who is second from the right? Rita is second from the right. Question number 11 is altogether a different question. So you'll have to solve it. Solve question number 11 now. What's the answer of question number 11? Most of you are saying question number 11, the answer is B. Let me check what is question number 11. Yes, the answer is B. As most of you are getting it, let me not waste time by solving these questions. Solve this question. This is the last question. After this question, we will break for the day. Done. Only few people have replied. So take some two, three more minutes. Solve question number 12, 13, both. Okay, two more minutes. I'm not getting a lot of answers like I got in the other questions. Question number 13, 12, people are giving varied answer. Somebody is saying D, B, C. Every answer is there. Question number 13, I have only got two, three, four, five answers. 13, A. Okay, let me solve this question for you. Anyway, what has been told in the question that E F G H I J K N, it means that eight people are seated around a square table two on each side. So here is the square table E F G H I J K. So it's not actually in this order. So there are three lady member, they are not seated next to each other. Okay, J is between L and F. G is between I and F. H is a lady member. It's second to the left of J. F is a male member, which is seated opposite to E, a lady member. So how many of them are lady member? I have identified H is a lady member. I have also identified E is a lady member. And there is a lady member sitting between F and I. So that I'll get after putting out the sitting arrangement. Now try to understand it J is sitting between L and F. So all the sides are same. Now on any side, these two positions are different. So try to understand I make different possibilities. So if J is sitting here, then L can be here, F can be here. If J is sitting here, then L can be here and F can be here. But you can say that if J is sitting between L and F, why can't I interchange the places of L and F? So for that, I'll have to make two other possibilities and I'm making those two other possibilities. So for this first case, when J is sitting here, F can be here and L can be here. And for this, I'm making a possibility here. So which is like this that when J is sitting here, L can be here and F can be here. Now I have four different cases. In all four cases, I try to identify which one is suitable for me and which one is not suitable for me. So G is between I and F. So G is between I and F. So in this case, G sits here, I is here. In this case, G sits here, I is here. And in this case, G sits here, I is here. In this case, just G sits here and I is here. Now what has been told, H is a lady member which is opposite to J. Now in this particular case, already opposite to J, I is sitting. So this particular case is not accepted to me. What about this case? In this particular case also, J is opposite to J, I is sitting. So this particular case is also not accepted to me. So I have only two cases left out, this and this, which tells me that if J is here, so what is opposite to J? Let me read it once more. H is a, no, did I read something wrong? H is a lady member which is sitting second to the left of J. So I perhaps read the wrong thing. One second guys, question reading mistake. In front of you, I am making this mistake. In exam also, you can make this mistake. I mean, I also used to make this. H is a lady member who is sitting second to the left of J. So if J is here, one, two, this case is not possible. This is left. If somebody is facing center, for J, this will be left, sorry, this will be right and this would be left. So this is left. So H is a lady member sitting to the left of J. H can be here. Now for J again, left would be here. So if you look at the second place here, is not accepted. So this is gone. Now H is a lady member. What is left of J is only, there are two places left out. Now how many places are left out? So this case is already rejected. So see in this case, opposite to F, H is sitting. So this is not possible. So I have only one case left out now. So which is E, F, I, J, K is not here. So I will put K here. So now let me find out the answer which among the following are three lady members. So three lady members are two. I have already identified H and E. So the third lady member is sitting between F and I, which is G. So it comes out to be G is third lady member. There is no such option here. So answer would be none of these. So this is my right answer. Now let me go to 13th question. The 13th question tells me about which of the following is true about J. So lady members are now finalized, three lady members H, E, Z.  That is correct. Position of J cannot be determined. That is also wrong. So A is the correct answer that J is a male member. Now question number 14, which of the following, who among the following is seated between E and H? So between E and H, between E and H, K is sitting. So answer would be none of these. See, here cannot be determined is there. I am cutting this and I am writing it none of these. When I will send you the answer, it will be corrected there. So it will be none of these. Question number 16, what's the answer? Question number 16 is how many persons are seated between K and F? So K and F from all three sides, from all two sides, three people are seated. So answer here would be three people. Now try to understand if there would have been a scenario where from this side, two people would have been seated and from this side, three people would have been seated. The answer could have been cannot be determined. I am taking option three here. Why? Because from both the sides, three people are sitting over here. So that is why answer is three. Remember, I am again repeating if from left side and from right side number of people are different. Hence the answer would be cannot be determined in that case. So this is what it is guys for from today's session. I hope you understood everything. If you have any doubt, do get in touch with me. So these sheets would be sent to you by tonight and you can solve it at home with answers. I'll send it to you so that you can do it at your place. So I hope you understood the session and I'm getting doubts only from one or two students. I do believe that most of you who are solving these questions also please don't leave the session now. I am planning a test on Friday, the coming Friday. So I'll publish the paper in class pro or in the group the paper test paper would be given to you and you will have to send me the answers. So one test would be planned this week, coming week on Friday sometime, Friday, Saturday, Sunday before the next class. Your test would be there. I'll let you know the timing. I'll let you know the format in which the test would be done. Mostly it'll be a 50 question test because we have only done three topics or four topics. So please send the answers to me and I'll let you know your answers. This is very important to track your progress in NTSC classes. So that is how it is. So thank you so much for joining the class and I hope you enjoyed the class. I hope everything you could understand. Thank you so much. Thanks for joining the class.


And you have never been to any of his shootings? Not really, but it was nice, it was nice spending time with him, had lunch and it was like being at home. She's been to earlier on to, when she was very small, she'd been once. And then there was an incident and after that she stopped. Without doing my makeup and you know the bulbs on the screen, on the mirror, one of them there was no bulb. So she put her finger inside there and got a shock and never came to the studio after that.


The World Migration Report is IOM's flagship publication and we certainly draw strength from our operational history. We've worked all over the world in many different settings so we have a lot of information and knowledge on migration processes. But increasingly we're being asked to bring that to an evidence-based policy kind of role and to be able to provide information on world migration globally, what's happening in terms of patterns and processes and trends to be able to inform policy-making deliberations as well as operational deliberations. Part of this involves partnerships. There's certainly strength in IOM's operational capacity in the field but increasingly we're working with some of the world's best migration academics and researchers to ensure that the material that we present is accurate, that it is balanced, that it's rigorous and that it actually takes into account the latest research, the latest empirical evidence. The lead chapter in the thematic part of the World Migration Report is a new take on a perennial issue. It's on migrants' contributions but it's looking at it in the context of this era of disinformation and disruption and what we find in the very latest research and evidence is that there are, especially in social media but in other forms of media as well, voices that are not only ignoring migrants' contributions but they are actually attacking migrants and they're downplaying very significantly the role of migrants in different settings in origin countries and more importantly and more pointedly in destination settings. So this chapter is about recalibrating and bringing back the evidence that we have drawn upon for a very long time in regards to migrants' contributions and how they actually support societies in economic terms, in sociocultural terms and also in civic political terms. A big part of the World Migration Report is explaining migration patterns over a long period of time. So we work with some of the world's leading migration data experts to produce tailored graphs to help explain how migrants move, where they move, the situations that they face, whether that's internal displacement or whether that's cross-border displacement in a way visually through figures and graphs and tables in a summary way to explain very long-term trends. It's been one of the highlights of the World Migration Report and we're pleased to say that we find that people use them in their studies, they use them in presentations and we're also finding that people are using them in terms of fact-checking and media reporting, both in traditional media and social media. So that actually helps us to strengthen and produce visual data images that help to explain the migration patterns and processes that are going on right around the world. We've previously printed every World Migration Report as we do with most IOM publications but this time it's only going to be available digitally through our online website but also through USB cards as well. Now there are two main reasons for that. The first of course is environmental. Not producing a hard copy World Migration Report will help us save one million pieces of paper in producing 4,000 reports. It's a big report and that's really important. We also save in terms of transportation impacts because it is a large report and it is quite hefty to transport around the world. There's also of course cost-saving measures because it's expensive to print and we are able to produce it online at much lower cost.


All right, what's up guys? We are back for another ESPN MIC highlight reel and boy did Alex come out of the gate swinging this week. So I'm not gonna get into numbers immediately but we are gonna get into them by the end, tally it all up as per usual. But guys, I do these videos every single Friday to kind of recap the week, make sure you guys are focused on the right stuff and learning from MIC's teachings. And if you're not a member, getting an idea of what we do and seeing if you wanna be confident in a purchase of MIC. So guys, check this out, two, one, three, four, five, eight, five, nine, nine, seven. Just hit me up any time but I will show you how to book a call during this, during this video and we will also recap that. But let's dive right in guys. So Monday, this 17th of April coming up on tax day, Alex made $27,000. He goes nothing more to say except stock selection is so important. Guys, we talk about this all the time, stock selection is literally everything. It's your best friend or your worst enemy unless you use it correctly. And this is why we teach this. And in a realm where there's so many stocks running on a daily basis, you guys have to understand where you really have to outline the ones where you actually have a specific edge. And we identify that edge with our community and show you guys what to focus on, what to do, et cetera, et cetera. So this was the 17th guys coming in day two, obviously Monday, coming off of Friday. So Friday it ran, coming in to Monday, Alex said, and specifically I think a top watch on a bounce. So this was his top watch guys. This thing is making a huge, huge crater for pre-market highs. And this is like the million dollar setup right here right into VWOP right before a zombie hour, especially with that kind of overhead and room to come down. We teach this, I teach this every single webinar. So if you have fantasy orders and you're ready, this is the million dollar setup. Top watch for a short at 4, 4, 50, 4, 75, five guys. It hit literally exactly four right there, stuffed, came back down.   So really beautiful job, Alex is just so good at that. And yeah, he's just great at, you know, patting the wallet and then, you know, being confident on the next go-around or adding to a winner when it's really proving that it's going his way. Let me remove some old images because I think I gave a webinar on this week, but PTPI as well on the 17th, which was right here. Again, guys, it's a day two right in the outer lines. Alex using the red and green line. If I pull up the watch list again, what did he say about it? Low float, so we'd need to major bounce to five, five, 50 and six. Guys, we got that right into five. And Alex used the red to green line kind of, you know, kind of action, especially right here in the morning open. But yeah, right there scaling upwards into five. It did exactly what we wanted. Alex was a little bit earlier than five, probably because this top out pre-market and then using this, risking off that, but just a beautiful job, just a really, really beautiful trade. So as you guys can see, Monday came out swinging. Let's see what the members did on Monday. Shout out a couple of people to show you what our members are doing, but Rachman with the outer lines always, and I love this. He's like, dude, PRST short, and then I flipped long at the box. So instead of over covering, he probably just was like, you know what? This is probably gonna hold. Front side shorts require front side covers, front side of this to move right here. Let me make my short and then let me buy on a support on the way up and sell on the way up. I love that. PathMaker's beautiful, beautiful job on CNSP, exactly what Alex did, literally picture perfect. And then Daniel, HC-19 on PRST. Dude, these are members, man, capturing the long side of the trade, and this is why stock selection is so important, guys. So while Alex is focused on the low hangers or the easiest short setups, we have members who are long traders and focusing on the long side. HooperX on CNSP, amazing, amazing job, and Rachman on a BBBY long. Riding the momentum, I love it, I love it. You guys are killing it. Tuesday, guys, Alex, again, it's like knockout, but it's like right, left, and then a master hook, but 27,000 again, 26,000, as the market heats up, I try to size up on high probability setups, which it has been heating up. I am now ignoring the hot stocks and trying to size in larger on day two and forgotten stocks while everybody essentially, you know, AKA, guys, throws their attention at all the major things running, taking attention of the herd. I have been very proud of my stock selection this week. I hope this action continues longer. If it slows down, I will size down, and that's exactly what Alex did on Wednesday because he didn't have a trade, but let's pull this up. So GMDA, and as you can see, the watch is right here, looking, all right, hold on, let me pull it up for you. GMDA on the 18th, I believe, right there. So guys, this was the 18th.  So as you guys can see, right here pre-market, Alex started scaling this pop, did a really good job, followed it on the way down in the open, covered, paid himself, and then hit it again. Picture, freaking, perfect trade. There's not much more to say about that. Absolutely picture perfect. Like I said, Alex is so good at adding to those winners. Well, let's see what the members are doing. So I always want to make time for the members, guys, to show you what you can do if you become a member. Awesome, E, nice call, Tom Diesel, I love it, the low hangers. Right there on TCBP, beautiful job. Ace, I love this, man, I love this. Frontside shorts require frontside covers in the channels, hitting where the stock failed before, and waiting for outer lines if it's midday. Just picture perfect process. I could shout this guy out every single day as he's still green, knock on wood, but the whole month of March, guys, the whole month of April, green every single day, waiting for those outer lines and following process. So Matteo, hats off again, buddy. Wonderful job, you're an inspiration. Elmack, I love this, man, I love this. Hammering DRMA, following trend on the way down, cushioning himself the whole way, especially as it's breaking down, being very convicted on the weakness or at least more confident and just a really good job. Soy sauce crushed, crushed this stock, and guys, it doesn't get much better than that. His first shirt was at 11, he's covering the last of his shares in the fours. That's insanity, that's literally insanity, that's insane. Wednesday, guys, I have a watch list, but Alex didn't trade that day, so I'm actually gonna pull up what the members did and see, like, here's the cool part, guys, you have to understand, Alex makes 27,000 on Monday, basically 27,000 on Tuesday, and the dude is like, you know what, I just cleaned around $54,000, I'm going to relax. If it ain't there, he doesn't force, and if it is there, he trades it. But the point is, it wasn't there, he didn't force, and there's a lot of people that come off literally over a $50,000 a couple of days and go, dude, let me make it 100k, let me make it 200. And then they'll just chase wrong setups or revenge trade or FOMO, or, you know, given a really bad habit, and you never see Alex doing that stuff. He really is the LeBron James of trading because he's just so disciplined in his process. It's so good. Hooper X, CNSP, Outer Lines, I love that, caught the pump and dump on that. Diego, CJJD, beautiful job, beautiful, beautiful, beautiful, right in a VWOP, I love that, again. Rockmon using Outer Lines, as always, the stock fell before, guys, you gotta hit it there and you gotta pay yourself on the dips and vice versa on longs. BYNE, waiting for the trend to break, waiting for that stuff, Death Candle, right there. Awesome, awesome, awesome job, waiting for the pop, hit the pop and covered under VWOP. Beautiful trade. Jay Trades, just following trend when you follow trend, man, this is absolutely phenomenal. And it's his best trade, I love that. He's like my new best trade, that's great. Thursday, guys, we're coming into the watch list and Alex made $7,300 on AUGX. Let me pull this up for ya. And I do, what is that, that's the 20th, yeah, the 20th. So right here on that first day run, Alex was basically saying potential hot chick of the day, ignoring a short until 320 breaks down and bounces fail and that's exactly what he was doing. So, you know, guys, the cool part about Alex when he says he's gonna do something, he doesn't. And, you know, this thing started tankin' right there into the open. He caught some and then re-hit right there. You know, this three minute charts versus one minute, so it's gonna look a little different.  And then hit it again. This stuff was so paramount right here. As you guys can see, you know, stuffs are pure panic, guys. And Alex was covering the majority of his size in here for a $7,300 win. Little bit crazy of a day today. He started off with a really good short on AUGX after the death camel confirmed it. Oh, I didn't even notice. He hit some BBBY, but ran out of patience like a newbie. Attacked CNSP, but when 265 key level failed, I cut it, started to realize I was over-trading when I took a short on BZFD in his zombie time, so walkin' away before I get myself into trouble. So I'm assuming Alex made a lot more than this, gave a little bit back, but awesome job still, $7,300. If $7,300 is a mess of day or an over-trade day for Alex, you know he's pretty good. If that's a sub par day for you, that's pretty good. Travers, we're not gonna catch the whole meat of the move all the time, but you know what? Really good job on this and great job, buddy. Again, guys, we don't need to capture every single top and every single bottom. It's just capture a good move, capture the meat as much as you can get. So Pathmakers, CNSP, I love this where the stock failed before, hit it, did not get squeezed in all this amateur midday stuff obviously guys during zombie hour, waited for the stuff moves, attacked again. I'm sure that little green one would definitely, definitely, probably a accidental hit for sure, but that's amazing, that's an accidental cover for sure, but this is great, really good job. Pathmakers again, AUGX, phenomenal, wait for this thing to break down, attack it. Guys, wait for your confirmations, this is the best anybody could do. And then simultaneously, look at this DRMA long of something that's completely holding and a ripstick right into where shorts are gonna be waiting short. And it's just picture perfect, man. You guys are just getting it, no matter if you're long, if you're short, you guys are knowing the channels, the outer lines, the levels where shorts should be covering and the levels where long should be selling and vice versa, all of that. It's just really, really good trading. And when we focus on the art of trading guys every single time without fail, the money comes. Like all you gotta do is focus on being a really good trader and the money will take care of itself. It's the people that are like, I gotta make money. And they're coming from this desperation, almost vibration or energy, so to speak, that they just, it's almost like there's a saying, and it's really funny saying Dambelzerian says this, but he goes, you know, the only two things in the world that when you need it so bad, nobody wants to give it to you and it's obviously, well, you know, for lack of a better term for John, he's like, you're not getting pussy if you need it, right? If you're desperate, but you're not getting money if you need it and you're desperate. But then once you're confident and you feel like you have enough of it, everybody wants to give it to you when you're not in desperate mode. So it's kind of just like that like follow, not to get too crass during this, you know, video, but it's kind of like guys get really confident in the art of confidence if it's with girls or, you know, the art of whatever it is that you do and the money will just take care of itself. And then the more money you get, the more opportunities, the more people want to give you more and this is why the rich get richer and the guys who are confident with women get laid more. Like I'm telling you, but if you're in that desperation, I gotta double my account, I gotta triple my account, I gotta get laid at the bar tonight.  So you gotta think about that. Neo, quick $3,000 a day, beautiful job. We don't normally share too many P&Ls, but when the members are crushing it, it's just awesome, man. You know, cause again, guys, again, it's not about the P&Ls. Size is relative to each individual trader, but process is not. Process should be the same. And that's what MIC teaches you. So then it's just dependent upon what size you want to start getting comfortable with, but it's about the same process that we teach everybody. So Friday, guys, coming into today, what do we have for you? We had PTPI, so Alex was on this today. Let me read the watch list for you. Topped out, but would need a major bounce towards $7,750 and $8,000 for me to short, guys. We got it, whole and a half dollar, number seven, beautiful, really happy with my performance this week, avoided the hot stocks and waited for the broken stocks to bounce and pre-planned all trades in the watches. PTPI was a picture perfect short today, right at seven. Guys, when you get these dead cat bounces and outer lines, I give you webinars, I got three webinars on this this week, literally. Three live webinars and how important that is to wait for and those confirmations of outer lines and those dead cat bounces on something that's already given back all of its gains, cause that's what you need, especially if you can combine that with a pivot point with a whole and a half dollar number. Guys, you're gonna be killers. I'm telling you, you're gonna absolutely slay, but you got to get a couple things of process down and know what to expect and how to expect and then how to execute on it. So, Steven, shouting out, Steven, shooting, Steven, shouting out Steven, I love this. Steven G, really nice job on process, buddy. Amazing, amazing, amazing. Ace, NBY and VCIG, wait for these things to top out, hit the bounce on both of those, beautiful job. Travers, PRST, what a phenomenal trade right there, she's mailing all the way out, love that. PRST, if you're not on the long side and you're on the short side, front side shorts, require front side covers, hit the channels, beautiful job, I love it. You guys are crushing it, check this out. So guys, every single month, we have Nancy, one of our moderators, Girls Trade 2. What she does is she tracks the watch list and I gotta show you the results of this. Alex's March watch list was 97.8% worked. 60.8% hit the line. So if Alex says something is on the watch list and these are the lines I'm into, 60% hit the line, 70% worked before zombie hours and 74 trades, total trade ideas for the month of March with a 97.8%. Guys, that is huge. Tom Diesel coming in at 92, 52 hit the line and almost 70% worked before zombie, unbelievable. You cannot make these numbers up guys. This is analytics, this is back to, this is metrics. This is literally why you're paying for MIC is you're getting the best education on the planet for becoming a small cap trader, a big cap trader or a swing trader or an options trader, we teach it all. So check this out guys, this is our chat room right here, 2,200 plus members, all wonderful, beautiful people. Irvin sharing his dinner, I love this. You know, someone at a wedding, broken leg is on going to a wedding. Here's the thing guys, every single day we start with the watch list. This is what you're paying for, this is what you get. We take it to the main trading chat on what we represented of what we have an edge on, bow making funny jokes every now and then. But the point is, is this is where the real education happens, the warnings and everything that you need to pay attention to, especially in small cap land. We have large cap and options room if you're not a small cap trader. So we've got tons of examples in there, tons of daily content and then we have live webinars weekly. So this is where you can navigate guys, there's an after hours channel like I just kind of showed you where members are showing what they're doing, people showing their cats, people showing past meetups, people showing funny jokes, their charts, whatever you want. It's just a really, really good and fun community that really has a big heart and I love to be a part of that. I love creating it for God's sake. But guys, check this out. So this is myinvestingclub.com. There's three things I want you to pay attention to immediately. And the first thing is, is watch our one hour free training. Guys, immediately click this button, put in your name, put in your email, watch the free course now. Guys, it's free. There's no strings attached. CFMICs for you give you a full breakdown. Number two is go down and view view Alex's verified broker statements or his earning statements. And it's dude, it's quite substantial over the last three and four years. So you guys can see this, especially if your number crunchers and kind of want to see, you know, if Alex is teaching you every day and you know, he's creating the watch listing. He's in the chat, live commentary. That's his track record. So that's the guy you're learning from every single day, guys. You have to understand how beneficial that is. And then the video library, which is super important. Guys, this is a search feature for anything you want to put in, FOMO, deathline shore, you know, death candles, whatever it is. And then if you scroll down, you're going to see our full roadmap of content right here. So this is the video library on myinvestingclub.com. We come right here, Alex's live trades, guys, this is huge. Alex will literally record live examples off his computer. He will comment, he will literally commentate after audio commentary. We'll splice it all together and you guys can see real, like right here, $67,000 profit, ATM dilution explained on ETNB that day and he guides you through and you can see his screen as he's executing and the PNL's fluctuating. So, super beneficial. If I go back to the main page, but you go to any page, guys, book a call. Book a free call, see if MIC is for you. It's going to take you to an online order form, fill that out, get some information and I will literally take a one-on-one call with you. It'll go to my Google calendar. We will see if MIC's for you and we can answer all of your questions just to make sure that maybe MIC is for you. So, guys, another announcement before I add up Alex's total, April 25th, save the date. This Tuesday, this Tuesday, we are doing a live screen share for annual and lifetime members. Bow and Alex are literally going to create the Watchless Live, Trade Live, Commentate Live. You guys can watch it the whole time, follow along and see what's going on, especially with the mentorship and education. That is this Tuesday, all day. If you guys want to upgrade, it is exclusive to our annual and lifetime members at MIC. If you want to upgrade for that or get access, just DM me in Slack Chat. Just send me a DM, guys. Obviously, this is my handle right here, tbadly90, just send me a DM. If you are not a member, what we will do is just text my line right here, guys.<PHONE_NUMBER> or you can email and I will get you more information on that. And then as per tradition, let's tally it up. This is the last thing, 27,000. I know we can do this in our heads usually, guys, but it's just, it's fun to see the numbers on the calculator.  It's so funny. He had like 27,27 and then like 7,373 practically. Guys, $68,300 a week for Alex. That's not including rebates. I'm sure this number is well over 75 by the end of the month.  It's insane. This guy's killing it. So this is your main educator, guys. This is the guy that took 35K to over $1 million small account challenge in 55 trading days, literally practically before April. You guys have to understand we are the number one community club and educators for day trading on the entire internet. And these are the results that your main educator is doing, teaching you daily. And if you want to be a part of this, you've got to reach out, guys. Book a call, get our free mentorship course on mindvestingclub.com and make sure that you come April 25th virtually to our event next Tuesday. Literally this upcoming Tuesday is gonna be a banger and we'll show you guys exactly how to do what Alex does, which if you learn this skill set, you can do it the rest of your life. So guys, that is the ESPN MIC Highlight Reel and we will do this again next week. So much fun.


Now let's talk about the character of Reverend Paris now Reverend Paris when we first meet him We learn that he is a widower in other words his wife has died his daughter is called Betty She's the one who is seemingly in what looks like a witch-induced coma and of course Abigail is his niece and Abigail lost her parents So he reluctantly takes her in Now we learned that Reverend Paris is actually not native to Salem He actually arrived there after serving and working as a trader and whilst he was a trader That's when he bought Tituba as a slave to work for him now Reverend Paris is someone who is seen as somewhat of a divisive figure He's someone who really clashes directly with John Proctor because John Proctor sees him as a very opportunistic person He uses the cover of religion in order to further his own personal interests Hence why when he became Reverend the third child of John Proctor has not been baptized by him because John Proctor Does not trust him now Reverend Hale essentially appears to be an outsider who much like a trader a merchant who basically does things for profit He appears to use his own position as a way to further his own interests as opposed to taking a genuine interest in Ensuring that Salem is free from witchcraft and the influences of the devil now He's actually the person who starts the idea of witches And of course he uses his daughter in order to raise this alarm that there's some form of witchery a foot There's some form of witchcraft is in Salem and it's affecting people and of course it's on his calling that key characters like the governor and Reverend Hale also come in in order to rid Salem of witches Now of course when it comes to key quotations for his character because you do need to be able to memorize Quotations and write about him in your essay or coursework So for example for your exams as well the first quotation to relate to Reverend Paris is when it states in history He cut a villainous path now in this quotation This is powerful because it really encapsulates the character of Reverend Paris He's somebody who is one that we cannot quite trust But it's very ironic that he ultimately ends up being the spiritual voice of reason Now in terms of word-level analysis to do here you want to first focus on alliteration of hate So history and he and of course the adjective hair villainous Okay, so ready from the outset we don't really trust Reverend Hill much like the way John Proctor doesn't really trust his intentions The second quotation to remember with respect to his character is the stage directions which state his eyes going wide and then he States no no there be no unnatural cause here So of course here he's trying to deflect people perhaps may be assuming that there's You know witchcraft being practiced in his house because of course Betty is in some kind of coma. She's incapacitated However, he appears to now be really careful because he's so concerned about protecting his own Reputation because he does also have some enemies now in terms of one level analysis to do for this quotation Firstly if we look at the stage directions the adjective wide showing how Reverend Paris he still is very much even if he uses the idea of Trying to remove the devil and trying to remove witches from amongst people in Salem It's still very much based on his own personal self-interest So of course the adjective wide showing his fear that in case people see him in a negative light He's now really concerned about his image Now the other word level analysis to do to do hair is actually a structural point You want to look at the repetition of no and in fact He says no no twice here and of course a third time here and here again This is illustrating how Reverend Paris is so intrigues and so for him It's very much about maintaining an appearance and it's also all about how he's using his position in order to further his interests Okay, and of course this makes us now really understand an empathize of why John Proctor saw him as a hypocrite The other quotation to remember for his character is when he states my daughter and niece I discovered dancing like heathens in the forest and this is a question now here Of course, this is tied into how he knows the truth He knows that Abigail was involved in some kind of negative ideas when they were dancing around However, he then feigns ignorance, okay? Now we learn of course He's the one that catches them in the act and you want to focus in terms of word level analysis on a Literation of D so discovered in dancing and also similarly like he then and of course do remember in the Puritan community Frivolous things like dancing music were forbidden. They were expressly forbidden But of course his daughter Betty as well as Abigail are breaking these rules The other quotations to remember for Reverend Paris's character is when he alludes to his enemies Okay, he doesn't want to give his enemies ammunition in order to criticize him because he says they will how me out of Salem Now, of course here you want to focus on the onomatopoeia how again Here we can see that he's not actually that concerned with curing Betty of you know Sources of witchcraft is more concerned with making sure that his position is protected Of course He also is more concerned with making sure that his enemies don't use his daughter's possession as an excuse to kick Him back out of Salem because remember he's not a native to this town The other quotations to remember with his character is when he states they've come to overthrow the courts and here He's been really critical particularly of people like John Proctor who are essentially criticizing the courts and criticizing The really really heavy-handed tactics that are being used on people that John Proctor and other characters seem as innocent however in this case Reverend Paris is defending the actions of the court the very hard Heavy-handed actions in prosecuting all of these poor victims and in this case the word of analysis You want to do in this quotation is the verb overthrow this idea that he's seeing himself as almost protecting the Judges who are in passing out all of these Ideas as to all of these women being guilty of witchcraft and of course also John Proctor being guilty So it's interesting here that Reverend Paris is actually very supportive up until this point of all the witchcraft proceedings However by act 4 he has done a complete U-turn because now he Realizes his position is now very precarious the witchcraft proceedings have gone too far and now he's focusing on self Preservation and of course he also realizes it's gone too far in covering up for Abigail Abigail has then stolen from him and run off with his money And now he realizes the fault and the actions in his own actions and especially his fault in Defending the witchcraft proceedings now the quotation to remember here Which shows his complete 360 turn is I would postpone these hangings for a while This is when he's talking to governor Danforth And of course here he's trying to ask if it's possible to just not have all these people killed including John Proctor So this is John Proctor who is firstly his enemy But now he realizes that it's within his interest for John Proctor to stay alive now here The word level analysis you want to focus on is firstly the pronoun I again This is showing that even if Reverend Paris has now changed his mind and he sees The proceedings going too far. He's still he's still not interested in the fact that it's because people have died innocent lives have been taken It's more now his life is in danger. He wants to stop this The other word level analysis you want to do here is the verb postpone and here He's lightly but kind of firmly asking if the governor can stop the hangings in order for there to be a bit more Peace and some justice restored. Okay, so that's really it when it comes to key quotations. Remember for Reverend Paris


Bien, mesdames et messieurs, mes amis, nous sommes, je pense, très heureux de nous tous d'être ici. Je suis très heureux maintenant d'être avec le Dr Anwar Gargash, qui, après des décennies extrêmement distinguées, est un professeur de l'Université, de la loi internationale et des relations internationales, et plus de 10 ans, servant comme secretariat de l'Etat des Emirates. C'est très bien connu par le Président de l'Etat des Emirates, si je peux dire ça. C'est maintenant le Président de l'Etat de l'Etat de l'Etat des Emirates. Et l'Institut Diplomatique ici s'appelle, qui est un unique honneur. Je sais, Anwar, que c'est un peu intéressant pour vous, mais c'est l'Institut Diplomatique de l'Etat des Emirates. Et si vous me permettez, nous sommes amis. Et cette conférence n'aurait jamais été placée en Abu Dhabi, comme c'est le cas aujourd'hui. Si nous n'avons pas discuté sur cette possibilité, sur beaucoup, beaucoup d'autres sujets, tous les sujets de la géopolitique, mais aussi sur d'autres choses, si nous n'avons pas fait tout ça pendant les deux dernières années. C'est donc un grand privilège d'avoir vous avec nous aujourd'hui. Et je vais commencer immédiatement la discussion avec une simple question, dans les deux dernières années, depuis que nous avons commencé à parler de la possibilité d'avoir la conférence ici, le monde a changé dans plusieurs formes, évidemment, la pandémie, qui n'est pas encore terminée, nous avons eu des sessions intéressantes sur le sujet, mais aussi l'accélération de l'USR, le nouveau président de l'Université de l'Université, l'Afghané, plus recentement, la choc pour quelque chose de ce qui s'appelle l'Aukus, etc. Donc ma question est très simple. Comment vous assisez toutes ces conséquences de ces changements, sur la situation géopolitique régionale? Merci, merci, Terri, merci pour ces mots de la nature. Je suis très heureux et heureux d'être ici. Je vois beaucoup de amis, donc je dis bonjour à tous, et je vous souhaite une bonne conférence. Je dirais que, pour commencer la conversation, et par la perspective ici, et par le Gulf, nous sommes vraiment en train de voir plusieurs dimensions pour les changements dans le système international. Je pense que, d'une main, la pandémie fait très très clair que nos priorités géostrategiques doivent pas seulement être des priorités politiques, mais que nos priorités géostrategiques peuvent être d'autres issues. Ces autres issues sont, comme nous l'avons vu, la pandémie, avec tous les effets sur l'économie, sur la vie des gens, sur les habits de travail, etc. Et je pense que, pour l'OEE, comme je suis sûr, beaucoup d'autres pays, une réorientation de priorités. Surtout pour nous, dans les priorités de l'OEE, elles étaient importantes, mais peut-être pas aussi persistantes, comme, pour exemple, l'économie logistique, etc. Ça a été très important. Je pense que cette dimension de système international est quelque chose que nous devons concentrer sur et ne pas permettre les politiciens à l'inforter, parce qu'en concentrant, c'est pour ça que je dirais qu'il y a un changement positif plutôt que de retourner à l'old ways. Donc je dirais que, à un niveau, les priorités politiques, en taking precedence over the political priorities, something that is totally unprecedented and new, we might have had moments in the international system where this was the case, but certainly nothing in our current media, in our current way we live, how we travel, etc. has been affected by this. And I can tell you that the OEE, part to deal with COVID-19 has learned many lessons. Now I think the important thing is that our memory should be longer rather than shorter on this issue, whether here in the OEE or whether in other areas. So I think that is the first thing. I think the second important issue is the multipolar nature of the political system. I mean clearly this has been an ongoing fees in the international system. The international system has witnessed after the fall of the Soviet Union a very brief American moment. Although the United States remains predominant and most important, but clearly the international system is not unipolar. What we have very clearly today is the presence of China. And that presence of China, economic, technological, in many regions in the world, political, I think will stay with us. I think we are all worried very much by a looming cold war. And I think for countries like all of us here present really in this hall, that is bad news for all of us. Because the idea of choosing is problematic in the international system. And I think this is not going to be an easy ride, but clearly China will continue to become extremely important. Now it is sometimes easier to understand America's direction than China's direction because of the nature of the debate and the openness of the debate. So while America's direction is something that you can gleam from various readings and conferences and discussions, understanding China's direction I think is more opaque. But fundamentally I think this is going to be a big challenge for all of us. For us here in the UAE, the United States is our predominant strategic partner. But China is our number one or two with India economic partner. And I don't think the issue is only about America and China. I mean if you look at our country the UAE has what I would call core economic and strategic relations with India, with Korea, with Japan and all these three countries have their own rivalry and problems with China. So it's not only recalibrating Chinese-American relations or American-Chinese relations but I think it is also recalibrating many other relations. India for example is our closest large neighbor or largest neighbor and India is in competition with China and how much trade we are making. And India is on the ascendancy also at the same time and I think for a country like us our size we are very concerned about this looming cold war and I hope that we don't get to that although realistically all the signals are not very encouraging. I think on the third level which is the regional level. The regional level and this is directing a lot of our current forum policy and policy movement. The region is is not much better currently than it was two years ago. I think the areas of potential potential confrontation have not become less. So it will need actually from all of us an understanding number one that confrontation is not the way forward and communication is the way forward. It doesn't mean that we will be able to change Iran's perception of its role in the region or Turkey's perception of its role in the region or how we see the Arab world and how it should come back to a more lively regional system. But at the same time I think we need to also understand that it is extremely important that we avoid confrontations and even though the road towards communication is longer and frustrating we really have no other option. Well thank you very much. I think that this point of for most countries which are represented in this room the problem of avoiding to be forced to choose is really a fundamental concern and many of us including for instance the members of NATO consider as you said the US is more predictable than China because we know more about the US but the direction clearly to force us to choose for instance to transform the Atlantic alliance into an anti-Chinese alliance even if the worlds are not used so it is a very big challenge but for the Middle East in the Gulf in particular it seems to me that there are two apparently opposite trends because on the one hand they should logically try to push you to take sides but on the other hand the withdrawal or the partial withdrawal from the Middle East which paved the way for more active policies on the part of Russia and Turkey for instance so how would you balance these analytical terms these two trends one pushing you to take sides and the other one becoming more indifferent if I can use that word I think we have several problems here I think the first one is we really have no Arab discussion on all these things so really everyone is on his own except for bilateral discussions perhaps we will have with Egypt or with Saudi Arabia as two of our closest friends but in general I think the Arab political system has decayed really over the past decade or two that these important issues need to be discussed and I think they have not been discussed any of these issues that we have we've spoken about so that I think is a problem I would say that we have to also understand that the United Arab Emirates is a medium sized country and its political gravitas and its economic weight so we really have no option except explaining ourselves communicating making sure that you know for example using our time and UN Security Council in the next two years to ensure that a rules based political system is the one that governs this international system I don't think we can definitely change course of the big players here the United States or China but I think communication is extremely important if there are concerns and worries we need to address them as you understand also that at times this political cold wars or confrontations are done with very little thought they are done with very little thought positions are taken and it's only later that people start really rethinking their thought process on it so I would say that we need to communicate with our partners and friends we need to emphasize the rules based international system because it's in our interest as it is in the interest of everybody else yet you raise something extremely important and this is really about the presence and commitment in the Middle East and I think Afghanistan is a big test we will see in the coming period really what is going on with regards to America's footprint in the region I don't think we know yet but Afghanistan is definitely a test and to be honest it's a very worrying test I think Europe is different because the United States has more of an internationalist view and an Atlanticist view and a NATO view on Europe and the Far East is different because the United States also is seeing that tilt to the Far East so you have this gray area in the middle and I think part of what we need to do is manage our region better because as I said there is a vacuum and whenever there is a vacuum there is trouble so it is extremely essential for us that we avoid vacuums it is extremely essential for us to talk to communicate and to understand also that in talking and communicating it does not necessarily mean that we will change certain policies but that we do need this de escalation so I see that as a major issue but when you say us us is you say sometimes Arab world sometimes the Middle East sometimes the Gulf countries can you elaborate a little bit who is us well I think the us using it in these different things is an issue that we have here I hope that I think we start with the national state because to be honest I don't really see the level of collective openness and collective discussion beyond the nation state but we need to push that forward we need to come and say these levels of analysis are changing the international system and because they are changing the international system it is too big for any single country really to address where it's place in this international system should be I don't think it is seeking to challenge anybody I think it is about securing this area where a lot of people see half of the issues of the world emanating from and some people say we've wasted too much blood and treasure on it and let us move on because I think the Middle East will not let you go away I mean that is really the lesson from the Middle East you might want to go away from it but the Middle East will not let you away either through national issues or thematic issues so I think that is a major issue another easy question you stressed rule based international system but last time Sijing Ping went to Davos he appeared as the great defender of the rule based system the problem is who sets not the rules but the changes of the rule so today the great challenge is that the Chinese to take the example of the Chinese and the US do not share the same view about what the rule should be so how could you how do you think that through communication and all the moves are describing do you think that as we we that is in between can work cooperate to have a certain real weight on how the rules will be adapted the rules have to be adapted with the world changes I think this is a very good question I think to start on a conception level you have in the Biden administration an administration that actually comes and says I want a rule based international system the Chinese are saying the same the Europeans definitely are also arguing for that I think it's in the interest of countries like us in the Arab world and in other areas in Africa and Asia to call for that so I think conceptually there is an agreement on this religion this rule based international system now I think as you said is the problem and I think here we need to be a little bit we need to speak out we need to come and say the world is not ready for another cold war and I think if this message comes across to the Chinese to the Americans and to others I think this will in itself create what I would so call a moral collective and I think this moral collective will be something very very positive it's not easy it's not easy but I'm saying what is the other option is it to allow the international system to go into its current trajectory and end up where we're all afraid where it will end up without too much thought without too much control or is it something where we can all come collectively and say it is in our interest we understand that there is a big confrontation coming for international system dominance but let us at least try and control this trajectory I don't know if that answers the question You know Anwar because we have discussed that so many times that the real purpose of the World Policy Conference is precisely this kind of dialogue that is the in between world that is all the metal powers who are not the super powers of the day and therefore our challenge is precisely to elaborate on these sort of things so now after having spoken of us or we I would like to enlarge slightly the concept of us or we to include explicitly Europe so by Europe let us restrict ourselves in the first step to the European Union while I say that I am hesitating because I think of course also the UK makes it slightly more difficult but nevertheless what do you expect from us as being this time the Europeans Well again I would say two things here I would say number one the collective European policy should be more pragmatist and more realistic in my opinion Europe because it's so many countries has not always been able to produce what I would say cohesive collective policies but I think looking from here towards Europe I think the voices of pragmatism should be the main voices what is possible rather than what is a very high ceiling that's never reachable I think that is extremely important I think this will depend a lot on the Franco-German cooperation and synergy over the coming two three years is this going to produce a more realistic cohesive policy I mean again a policy here as the UAE on the bilateral level we're doing very well we're doing very well with France we're doing very well with the UK and many other European countries but the issue is collectively I think there is a huge gap between a policy that's propagated and a policy that is ready to apply on the ground I think reducing that gap will be very good not only for Europe but also for Europe's traditional partners such as ours I think that is extremely important for us we also look at the recent drift for example between Paris and Washington and we're not happy with these things because we would also like to see more cohesion among our traditional partners because we don't really want to play one partner against the other because our partnerships are extremely different but I think that is extremely important a more real politic pragmatist approach from Europe I think is required in the coming period