Good afternoon, everyone. I really want to thank everybody first for for making time to be a part of this important webinar. I happen to be out Richmond so I need to acknowledge them in the traditional territories of the Musqueam peoples, unceded territory, and I'm really grateful that we're able to gather as many concerned citizens of the like mind to make a stand to stand up and demand that the environment be respected in its fullest context and to not be distracted by the modern-day beads and trinkets that the federal government wants to bring out to First Nations people and I think that what they're doing is they're capitalizing on poverty and exploiting a situation that they themselves have created and it is going to take a strong measure of reconciliation amongst First Nations and Canadians to stand united and to continue on with the struggle that we have to put a stop to this madness, this this kinder Morgan twinning and the fact that it is just simply unwelcome in far too many places but I'll keep my comments brief. I want to introduce Mr. Josh Patterson from the BC Civil Liberties Union and he's going to provide us with the legal update. Thank you very much Chief Chamberlain. I just want to make sure my slides are coming up there. So I'm really happy to speak to all of you here online from Vancouver and Unceded Coast Salish Territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh nations. Haichka, thank you for the introduction, for the welcome. I want to thank the Union of BC Indian Chiefs and stand and acknowledge Chief Bob Chamberlain for the extraordinary leadership that he provides not only to his nation and to indigenous nations throughout the lands known as BC and Canada through the Union but also to settlers. The Union and Chief Chamberlain are always there speaking, educating, holding out a hand to others even as they put their feet down to protect people's rights and I really want to thank Chief Chamberlain for having us here today to speak. I'm going to have to go pretty quickly after the Q&A is done for child care reasons so please don't take offense if I'm moving rather quickly. What slide have we got up there? I can't actually see. Oh, we can move to my next slide. Thanks, I guess I'm gonna have to say that. The information that we're going to be providing today is in general in nature. It's not going to answer all your questions. It's not going to apply to every case and it's also not legal advice and shouldn't be relied on in any legal proceeding. I want people to be aware that there may be police who are monitoring the conversations here today. We know for a fact that police have undertaken monitoring and surveillance of these very kinds of conversations before and so anyone who's speaking today should expect that that might be true today too. If we can advance my slide to the next one. The purpose today is to talk about your rights when you're using your freedom of expression, your freedom of assembly to participate in lawful and democratic protest activity. We want you to know what your rights are so that you can make informed decisions. For the BCCLA today our purpose is not to promote any particular view and it's certainly not to promote or encourage any kind of action. No matter what side of an issue you fall on or what actions you take you have rights and we're going to talk about what some of those rights are today. Next slide please. The workshop today is going to deal with the laws of Canada and British Columbia but I want to acknowledge that Indigenous laws continue to operate on the land and just because I'm focusing on on the laws of Canada here it doesn't mean that there aren't other laws that are operating and that need to be paid attention to. So the law of protest in BC. I'm briefly going to cover a few topics today. The first is injunctions and injunction zones. The second is what are your rights upon arrest. The third is what kinds of charges might be related to protest and demonstrations and the fourth is civil lawsuits against demonstrators. I have a longer version of this presentation that talks about a lot more things to do with your rights when you're dealing with police, whether you have to talk to them, what you have to do if you're being searched, all kinds of different things. I can't cover that all today. There are some other resources on the next slide that do talk about those things in detail. One is on the right the BCCLA's arrest handbook which can be found and downloaded online. It's a few years old but basically is still accurate. And then if you google for the guide to the law of protest in BC you will find a publication by Leo Magrady which covers in much more detail everything that I'm going to be talking about today and a whole lot more. So starting straight in on injunctions and injunction zones. An injunction is a court order to stop interference with the legal rights of a person or a company or the government. They're a very powerful tool and in many ways they've become the preferred tool for companies and governments to try and put an end to protests, to demonstrations, to occupations, to tent cities in relation to homelessness, and to labor disputes. They aren't given automatically. They can only be given when a company sues someone first. And so if people remember back in 2014 when a number of activists on Burnaby Mountain were sued there couldn't have been an injunction or an injunction zone unless someone had been sued unless there was a legal action being taken. So first a company has to sue someone. They have to accuse someone of wronging them in an ongoing way. And then a court has to decide whether to grant an injunction and they hold a hearing for this. When they're holding that hearing, which won't be immediate, sometimes it'll be a week later, it'll depend on the availability of parties, it'll depend on the availability of lawyers. But when that hearing comes around they will assess the merits of a lawsuit. The first thing that they'll consider in deciding whether to grant an injunction is is there even any merit to this lawsuit to begin with? Is there a serious legal matter involved? So there's a hurdle that the person who's suing or the company who's suing has to meet. Then they have to figure out whether or not the company would suffer some kind of irreparable harm if the court refused to grant the injunction.  And usually not a trivial quantity of money but it's you know probably a fairly well it'll depend but oftentimes these are fairly decent amounts of money that are alleged to be lost, particularly on larger industrial projects. Then the court has to assess which of the parties that either the company or the people the defendants being sued would suffer more harm from the injunction being granted or not granted. And if they decide in all the circumstances that it's the company who would suffer more harm then they may grant the injunction in favor of the company. When a court is making a decision about whether to grant an injunction they may also be assessing First Nations rights claims that come into play around granting the injunction. And there have been some cases recently or a few years ago I guess part of the Wetzowitun people a clan in the Wetzowitun people actually succeeded in stopping a forestry company from getting an injunction to stop them from taking action on the land because they said that they had Aboriginal rights and title in relation to that land and that in fact they would be harmed more if the injunction were granted than the company would have been harmed if the injunction were not granted. An injunction zone sometimes there will be a zone in an injunction that doesn't just say you can't do a certain thing but you can't be a certain place and that's actually what we saw on Burnaby Mountain for those who remember. There was a zone set up it was defined by geographic coordinates and there was a requirement in the court order that that be clearly marked and that everyone be able to know what that zone was that you were not allowed to cross. We're going to come back to the consequences of breaking an injunction in a moment but quickly are there any questions on an injunction or an injunction zone or wait a second hold on our to my host are we actually entertaining questions or not are just steaming through how's this how's this going to work? I think Josh that we wanted to hold for till the end of your presentation. Forgive me everyone we will hold to the end. So I'm going to come back to what happens if injunctions are broken and I'm going to talk about interactions with police. I'm not going to talk in tons of detail about it because I have a lot more to get to. There are three main reasons that police could approach you on on the street and this applies in the context of demonstration and actions as well. The first reason is they're just making conversation or they need your help with something. The second reason is that they're investigating you and they've decided to detain you in what's called an investigative detention and the third reason is that they're arresting you and the rights that you have as a person are as an individual related to the police vary in each of these circumstances. For today's purposes I'm going to talk about the first reason police are just talking to very briefly and then I'm going to skip to the third reason which is police are arresting you. The investigative detention piece is something I'm going to leave out but you can find out more about it in either of those two guides that I mentioned at the top of the presentation. So generally if police approach you do you have to identify yourself. If you're not under arrest you're just walking around or you're out somewhere you have to identify yourself. Generally under the law the answer is no you have no legal duty to identify yourself unless the police see you committing criminal offence. If the police demand your identity when you have they have not seen you committing an offence just because they feel like it or because they're suspicious or because they want to have a record of who is in a certain place you do have a right not to identify yourself. However it's important for everyone to make a practical choice about whether they want to identify themselves anyway. If you feel threatened if you feel like it might make the situation easier you might choose to identify yourself and really that's a decision that's up to you based on your safety and other considerations. You may want one of the considerations would be privacy and whether or not your name might be included in in certain records that later become searchable by law enforcement. It is illegal however to give a false name address or fake ID to the police okay so don't do that because that could actually amount to abstraction of justice and something you could potentially be charged for. When you do have to give your name an address to the police is if you're being arrested if you're driving a car and mind you passengers don't have to provide this information but drivers do. If you're being given a ticket for breaking a city by law or any other law if you're being given an appearance notice to to show up at court or if you're being accused of trespassing under BC's trespass act so in all of those situations you do have to give your name an address and if you refuse to do so it could result in them deciding to charge you with with abstraction. Under BC law in the next slide there's some real background noise that I'm getting I don't know if someone's not muted there but just putting that out there. So under the police act in BC uniform police do have to identify themselves by law and have to wear a badge with their ID number or their name. The only exception is that senior officers don't have to wear those things. If the officer's identity is not clear you can ask an officer to identify themselves and of course you can photograph officers. If an officer is behaving improperly you may want to note their description, their height, their weight, their hair color, other distinguishing features in case you later need to identify them. Undercover officers do not have to identify themselves and if you suspect that there is an undercover officer in your midst we recommend that you do not try to expose that officer by shouting or by pointing because you could actually be charged with obstruction of justice for outing an undercover officer. If you believe that there's an undercover officer in your midst it's a better strategy generally to you know you can quietly let people know that you suspect someone may be an undercover officer so that people will be careful but you want to be really cautious about trying to to call them out. Now if they have their badge on they don't actually need to tell you their their name and sometimes at Burnaby Mountain I was getting questions from folks about well they'd officer would refuse to tell me their name or something like that but their badge number was clear on their uniform and so they don't actually have to if the identity is clear to you they don't actually have to tell you anything further about it. I move to the next slide now so what happens if you are getting arrested? In general in most protests in BC it's fairly rare for people to get arrested but of course it does happen and at Burnaby Mountain we saw a very large mass arrest for people who were being accused of breaching the injunction and you can only generally be arrested in a few circumstances. If there's a warrant out for your arrest you can be arrested without warrant if the police believe on reasonable grounds that you've committed or are about to commit an indictable offense which means a serious offense or if the police see you committing any kind of criminal offense whether serious or not they can also arrest you if you are breaching a court order using their common law power and not under the criminal code. Police have to tell you why you're being arrested unless it is obvious. You have the right to ask why you're being arrested so you can ask if you're under arrest you can ask on what charge they for what reason you're being arrested and again the police have to answer unless the answer is obvious and it's important if this happens to you to try and remember what it is that they say it can be very stressful of course if you're if you are being arrested or detained it's usually a fairly high stress moment for many people and it can be hard to actually remember and kind of think straight afterwards so if you are a witness to this happening and the police officers are giving information to your friend or a colleague or someone else that you're organizing with you can try and remember what it is that they say or to write it down because that may be helpful later. Everyone has a basic constitutional right to be informed promptly of the reason for their arrest. The next slide how will you know if you're under arrest well you'll know you're under arrest if the police tell you or if they make it clear that you aren't free to go by physically holding you. It's important we recommend to stay calm you do have to identify yourself police are allowed to conduct a full search of you and your personal property for evidence or weapons and it's important to cooperate fully with the arrest with the police if you are arrested because any resistance could result in further potential charges. You can go limp if you like the courts have said that that isn't resisting you don't have to help them in arresting you but you need to remember to do what's safe if you go limp it's going to be the police's responsibility to carry you or to move your body and you know that may not be safe even if police are making their best effort to keep you safe accidents can happen and you could be placed in in some danger and so you have to think very carefully about that. If you are taken to jail you have the right to appear before a judge or justice of the peace as soon as is reasonably possible within 24 hours. Now if you are arrested you should immediately ask to speak to a lawyer this is on my next slide. By the way there's no such thing as only one phone call you have the right to take appropriate steps to get in touch with a lawyer and beyond giving your ID information and your address you do have the right to say nothing complete first and last names complete address and date of birth are the only things that you actually have to provide anything else like they say on tv could possibly be used against you. So I'm going to skip to some of the common reasons for arrest. Civil contempt of court or criminal contempt of court that was the reason that people on Burnaby Mountain were arrested it's not a traditional criminal charge and the requirement is that a court order has to been breached the order had to have stated clearly and unequivocally what should and what shouldn't be done. The party who disobeys the order has to do it deliberately and willfully and the evidence must show that they disobeyed the order beyond a reasonable doubt. It's possible to be have fines levied against you or made against you it's even possible to be imprisoned for a civil and criminal contempt of court although it's rare but because imprisonment is one of the possible options in this kind of a proceeding you get all the kinds of procedural safeguards that you would normally get in the criminal trial. Criminal contempt as I said is pretty rare and it adds a fourth element in addition to the first three that there was an order that was clear that you disobeyed it willfully and that the contempt is shown beyond a reasonable doubt to have a charge of criminal contempt against you your conduct has to be so much in defiance of the rule of law and designed to interfere with the court's order that it would bring the administration of justice into scorn or disrepute and while this is rare it does happen Betty Krajcik was found guilty of criminal contempt of court because of her repeated disobeying of an injunction in relation to a forestry action back in like 2003 or so she just kept going back despite being ordered not to do so and the court said at the time that her conduct was open public continuous and flagrant disobedience it was staged and orchestrated with communication to the media for the purpose of dissemination to the public and without regard for the effect that her conduct might have on the respect accorded to orders of the court and so when you had in her case repeated disobeying of the law of the court's order accompanied by accompanied by a lot of publicity around it the court in that case found that she had committed criminal contempt and she was sentenced to imprisonment there are other things like breach of the peace if you're causing a disturbance that involves some potential for violence you can be apprehended for breach of the peace public intoxication pretty obvious if you are under the influence of alcohol or drugs if you commit mischief i'm going to run through these pretty quickly mischief is very wide-ranging and is often used it can include destroying damaging or rendering an operative any property or preventing or interfering with its lawful use so for example folks who bash things into trees to try and prevent them from using saws these types of things could be subject to mischief charges assault using force against another person directly which can include the threat of an assault and even just applying your hand to someone's arm without trying to hurt them can be an assault sometimes people can be charged with assault when they're resisting arrest so if they lash out or if they they kick or if they flail their arms out and it comes into contact with an officer you could actually be charged with assaulting an officer that's very serious indeed obstructing a police officer is another one anyone who willfully obstructs the police in the execution of their duty this can include things like getting too much in the way of the police sometimes photographers or videographers can risk this if they are getting too close to a situation in such a way that it interferes with the ability police to do their duty there are lots of different ways that people could be found or at least it could be accused of obstructing a police officer in these types of situations and so it's it's very important to be to be aware of that I'm going to skip ahead because I'm near the end of my time here to the next slide which is about civil liability so typically in a situation of where you're getting sued the company will ask the court for an injunction to get people to stop whatever it is they're doing that's what happened on Burnaby Mountain there are different things that they can accuse you of what people on Burnaby Mountain were accused of was interference with contractual relations so stopping the test drillers from from fulfilling their contract with Trans Mountain to drill and there were damages claimed to five point six million dollars for the time that would be lost and the money that would be lost trespass is another one nuisance those protesters were also accused in that lawsuit of the civil tort or the civil wrong of intimidation people will remember k.m face kinder Morgan face people were making faces and otherwise appearing menacing or so it was alleged that was thrown into the lawsuit too and these are pretty serious matters in addition of course being charged potentially charged with civil contempt if you breach the injunction that accompanies these lawsuits which a lot of people were charged with civil contempt of court and remember those court charges were all thrown out or if you don't remember I'll tell you now they were all thrown out because the company had screwed up where the line was in terms of the injunction zone Sven will remember about that I'm sure and can talk about that after I'm off the call but these torts can be fairly serious and they can tie people up with with lawsuits that cost them a lot of money to defend and so some of one of the persons from the kinder Morgan lawsuit had to take out a mortgage on their home in order to in order to pay for the pay for the costs people were spending tens of thousands of dollars in some cases people can wind up being on the hook for you know into the hundred thousands of dollars just for the for the legal fees never mind if there's ever a judgment against them and right now in BC and I don't have time to talk about it we don't have anti slap suit legislation or legislation that would allow for lawsuits to be easily thrown out when they're being brought for improper reasons just to shut people up or to stop them using their freedom of expression and so this issue of civil liability is a very serious one and you know the the kinder Morgan protesters who are being sued tried to have that suit thrown out and they were unable to get it thrown out it was eventually dropped but the court said look even if this is infringing on your your freedom of expression rights the company did actually lose some money here arguably because of the stuff that you were doing we haven't determined that yet but at least there's an argument to be made so no I'm not throwing the the case out and we're going to have to litigate it and so it's really something to think of the exposure to liability when you're contemplating the kinds of protest in which you engage and whether or not you might be exposing yourself to something that you don't expect I'll close my remarks on that I don't have very much time for question but but here I am anyways if you have any you can ask me Josh we've got a question from Kathleen I'm going to read it for you what are the ramifications of protests related charges in relation to international travel does it make a difference if the charge is civil versus criminal well that's a really tough question to answer so as an overall matter any of these kinds of charges whether or not they're ultimately dropped can create barriers for you when you're trying to cross borders all of the information in our police databases is able to be shared with us customs and border patrol officers both inland here at Vancouver airport and also on the US side of the land border and so it's really up to the United States what they choose to do with that they can decide as individual officers oh I don't really care about this or oh this wasn't that serious or they can decide that it's very serious and and decide not to let you into the United States so any of these things any of these things where you come into contact with the police have the potential to wind up in the hands of US customs and border control and we have no control anymore over what happens with that information when it's there so there's not a lot of comfort that I can give to folks about oh well it was only a civil thing or whatever if your name is coming up as getting arrested that can be trouble okay great and josh do you think you have time for one or two more sure okay um and then I think we're going to try to get other ones to you after um there are some great questions coming in does the state of emergency in BC affect uh arrests you mean in relation I guess we're talking in relation to the fires um I'm not sure I can dispose of that quickly I just don't know I don't know the answer to that I'm sorry okay great and that was from pranshu pranshu thank you for your question um can people defend them this is from terry can people defend themselves in lawsuits brought in the types of situations you describe uh if the question is can you defend yourself without a lawyer the answer is yes but it's extremely difficult um and all of these things that are being accused against you tend to have very technical elements to them um uh and it can be really really hard to successfully defend against them without counsel so it can be done but it's it's difficult okay great I'm going to give you just one more question and I have I see that a few people are raising their hands because josh is going to have to go in just a minute please do type your questions into either the chat or the questions area and we'll try to get some more questions um answered later so don't just raise your hand go ahead and type your question in so the system will record them for us um so last question for josh um jeremy is asking the bernaby rcmp said consent requires an affirmative can we ask the rcmp whether free prior and informed consent has been provided well you can ask them about that for sure um but it's not the rcmp's so the the federal government and the provincial government have obligations um under I would argue under the union the united nations declaration of the rights of indigenous peoples to respect free prior and informed consent and they have obligations under Canadian law to respect the constitutional rights of first nations but the crown would say the government would say it's not individual rcmp members jobs to adjudicate that on the spot they have to follow the orders that they're being given so if they're being ordered by a court to to remove people or told by a court that it's illegal for people to be in a certain place they have discretion as to whether or not they're going to move in on a certain day or what they're going to do they don't necessarily have to go in and make arrests but it's not really up to them as individual officers to make decisions for themselves about about what they're going to do in relation to whether or not indigenous rights have been respected now in my saying this i'm not condoning or saying that i think it's a good thing for government agents to act in violation of the crown's constitutional obligations not at all just that um you can ask them that question I wouldn't expect them to have a particular answer on it and I wouldn't necessarily expect it to uh affect the way that they're going to deal with you all right I literally have to go now to pick up my kid at a child care facility day camp where she needs to be picked up from I just can't stay any longer I'm happy to answer some other questions later and thank you very much I'm gonna close my computer now great thank you so much Josh and everyone everyone stay with us here and again um uh and we're going to bring Chief Chamberlain and and also Sven Biggs in and if um did have a question for Josh please do remember to um type that into the chat or the questions area note that it's for Josh and we'll work on getting some of those questions answered after okay and um let's see I'm just going to see if we can get Sven's video going there we go okay great and wait I'm sorry will you remind me Sven I can't uh I have forgotten the order of our next part Bob uh this is the spot to give a pitch for the Coast Protectors Project if you wanted to do that now am I live now okay I'm quite excited to see that there's an excess of 200 people that are on this webinar uh the information that we just were provided was very useful in order for us to look after our rights and of course when I when I think of the Coast Defenders and I think of the numbers that we have amassed uh it makes for a very stark political reality for the federal and provincial governments and I believe that cities such as Burnaby and Vancouver and the provincial government recognize that but where we fall down or where where the message needs to be furthered is with the federal government and of course um the Union of Beast Indian Chiefs has a resolution very clearly opposing Kinder Morgan in the expansion standing in solidarity with the nations that are firmly opposed but as with any effort within any campaign uh there is always always always a need for resources and I know myself that I'll be contributing $20 to help this and I'm hoping that you know between all of us if we can find that uh that place within us to maybe not go to Starbucks and Tim Hortons for a week and save that little bit of money and put it towards this very incredibly important initiative to stop something that has the potential to impact generations of British Columbians Canadians First Nations and very long-term serious serious threats to our environment and for the 200 people that are on here I want to thank you especially for your concern for the environment I see it around the world now that people are turning to Aboriginal people and recognizing that our holistic views of lands territory and resources are indeed the path forward it's in stark contrast to western civilizations approach to trees are to be cut down and oil is to be sold and so on and so on but what we are facing now is actually the health and well-being of the very planet that we live on and I know that everybody that's involved on this webinar today realized there is no plan B for an earth to live on and so I really want to thank everyone for taking time to be here today and encourage you to speak to your family your friends your circle of influence and let's keep some resources and come again so this important work can continue thank you very much thank you so much Chief Chamberlain my name is Sven Big and and I want to begin my little presentation here by acknowledging that I am on the the territory of the Bosquean Swarovitz and Squamish peoples here in Vancouver I'm going to update folks a little bit on what's going on Kinder Morgan's construction plans what's happened with the provincial government recently and some upcoming court cases about Kinder Morgan and then we'll open it up and Chief Chamberlain and I will try to answer some of your questions about what's going on with Kinder Morgan and we will also follow up this webcast with resources there'll be a video of everything so you can watch Josh's slide show again and go through that presentation and those two resources that he mentioned in his presentation the arrest guide and the the other information about about your legal rights in that situation so we've heard a lot in the media going all the way back to May with Kinder Morgan announced they had the financing in place for their pipeline that they were planning to start construction on September 1st of this year and according to a construction schedule they filed with the National Energy Board what that's going to look like is in September they'll begin work on the tanker terminal in Burrard Inwood right across from the Swelliches community they're going to start working on expanding the tank farm that they have as of their current tank farm on Burnaby Mountain they also have plans to begin their tunneling operation under the mountain itself and they're going to start constructing equipment and supply depots all along the road stretching from Vancouver all the way to Edmonton they've continued to kind of raise the the tension around this just last week they announced that they had identified a contractor for the lower mainland section of the pipeline that's a consortium of two major construction companies QIT and Leadcore for folks who are on the call that are part of the labor movement you'll be interested to know that both of those companies hire workers through CLAC or the Christian Labor Alliance of Canada which isn't part of the mainstream labor movement and in fact it works with employers to undermine the rights of their workers and we've been told that it's most likely that CLAC will represent workers on the Kinder Morgan pipeline and there's even a potential that the companies will bring in temporary foreign workers to do the construction work amongst the kind of labor rattling that we've seen from Kinder Morgan around construction stuff they've even in response to the the bc government's recent announcement of their first steps to address the threats of the of the pipeline we saw them even in their statement in response to that say that they were going ahead with construction on September 1st so they've been very clear in the media that that's their plan however we think the announcement from the bc government really changes the playing field around construction and the timeline so it was just two weeks ago now that bc's new attorney general david ebe and minister of environment and climate change strategies george heyman announced the first steps that their government are going to take to protect bc's coast and interest around the Kinder Morgan pipeline we think the most important part of that announcement was saying that Kinder Morgan had not met key conditions that are part of the permit that christie clark issued to the company when it comes to consulting with first nations without meeting these construct these conditions construction cannot begin on the pipeline this is a result i guess of a long-standing process practice and industry of just doing the bare minimum on consultations which is often called tick box consultations with first nations and indigenous people and governments of all political stripes turning a blind eye to that practice and allowing companies to get away with not needing their their the requirements that they have under the constitution and the permits that issued by government so we think it's a it's a strong signal that uh this our new government is going to enforce the law around this kind of consultation and we're really pleased to see that that change beginning to happen in our provincial government it's really important to know that that doing a proper consultation is going to take months it is not a short term or brief uh making phone calls to banned officers what we've seen in the past so this is really a a a serious break on construction um we have also as part of that announcement the bc government hired former supreme the supreme court of bc chief justice thomas burger to act as their new lawyer on uh legal issues relating to kinder Morgan um thomas burger is probably best known for his work leading with the kenzie valley pipeline inquiry he's also considered to be one of the pioneers of enshrining the rights of indigenous people in canadian law so and from our opinion he's uh probably one of the best possible people to to take on this job and we'll be watching closely to see what kind of legal strategies he comes up with with the province and how they're implemented um and then just yesterday um as one of the first at his act uh thomas burger filed paperwork with the federal court of appeal to intervene in the legal challenges that have been brought by first nations and environmental groups and cities against the project um we think the this kind of package from the province is a really good first step and um we need to keep up the pressure on them to to make more steps in this direction but we're we're pleased with the direction that they're headed in for for now um so that takes us uh to the legal challenges that are going on right now there are 19 different legal challenges against the permits that have been issued for the kinder morgan pipeline and by far the strongest comes from first nations um it was just announced last week we have uh court dates for the federal challenges um they're gonna going to start on october second of this year and once they're the 12th in the federal court here in vancouver um ultimately it's these kind of cases brought by first nations that stock emberges northern gateway pipeline so we have a lot of hope for these cases however they're incredibly expensive and it's a huge burden for the first nations that are bringing these court cases to have to to make they have to literally choose between uh putting money into these kind of trials and paying for lawyers and providing services to their communities in some cases so it's a lot to ask them to do um because of that uh the environmental community has come together and launched our fundraiser called pull together you can find it online at pulltogether.ca we've already raised half a million dollars through this um we the goal is is 600 000 so we're close but we yet need to raise more and um but even then we're just beginning to kind of scrape the barrel a case like this if it goes all the way to the supreme court it cost each nation involved over a million dollars so more needs to be done to support those nations um that that is the kind of where we're at we feel pretty strongly that uh kinder morgan is going to try to continue to kind of bluff around construction uh and we need to prepare both to to stand up to them on the ground and uh to support first nations and other folks fighting them in the courts um and I think we're ready for your questions take a look got a bunch uh here that are probably better for a lawyer um but I see uh somebody here they're asking about a construction camp near valmont um so this is one of those camps that that I mentioned that we were expecting to see in september if they go ahead at this point though they would be in violation of provincial law they did that all right and uh Sven this is Ann we brought uh chief chamberlain's video back up and chief chamberlain you're still muted though we should unmute you there you go perfect thank you so if there are other questions about what's going on okay here I see a question from the moron are there plans to pick it the advertising and production companies with CNS with KM Contractors Association energy company propaganda with hong gree watching um there aren't currently uh anybody that I know planning to target the folks making those ads although that's an interesting point of view what we've really found is that uh by mobilizing on social media and organizing ourselves the best way to push back uh and coast protectors is a great part of that so if you haven't already taken the coast protector pledge we encourage you to to go to coastprotectors.ca and take the pledge and we'll keep you in the loop about what's going on and how to how to get more involved as we move forward so I see a question here uh interview is bernaby going to be a hot spot at least initially for this protest um I mean based on the construction the schedule um it it absolutely is going to be a hot spot um one of the key things to get this project done on time which kind of morgan needs to do to satisfy their investors is to start the tunnel under bernaby mountain on september 1st currently we don't believe that can legally happen uh but kind of morgan seems willing to at least um is at this point bluffing like they're going to go ahead with or without permits um which is a pretty dangerous thing to be doing so um I think folks in bernaby uh should be thinking about uh how to how to get organized um but we also are uh are uh going to be looking for communities all along the pipeline right to be standing up and we know that there are folks organizing in the indigenous and non-indigenous community bob is uh did you want to jump in on any of these well there there's quite a range of questions here and i'm thinking you know like the the one that I see from robert about uh oh my gosh where did it go there's quite a list what the reasonable scenario you know when I consider what's going on in in canada right now where we have the federal government taking on the 10 principles for reconciliation with first nations and of course that is taking a backward look at different legislation and processes and laws which are not consistent with the rights and title or the court of case law that's supposed to guide them and so I'm curious to see just how quickly uh the results of this federal initiative are going to be and I'm also quite focused on how well this uh the coalition of the provincial NDP and the provincial green party do and embracing new and declaration of rights indigenous people of course when you consider the division of power from the constitution between canada and the province the look examine and understand how is it that first nations free part consent is going to be folded into that decision making in the province and at the federal level uh to meet with uh mr eiford when he did his work for the previous government and I suppose to him I said well if we're going to have a pipeline I said we have to be cognizant of the reconciliation direction from the from the supreme court of canada and of course that's not in my mind so simply focused on the government's relationship with first nations but first nations relationship with themselves as well as with British columbians and I had suggested to him at that time at a couple of his meetings that from the source of the pipeline to the end of the pipeline that they coordinate uh workings of all the first nations whose territories are affected or potentially affected uh vis-a-vis uh oil spills which of course we know will happen it's not a question of if the oil spill will happen the question of where and what I proposed was having a harmonizing of some measure of land use planning and economic development visions for each nation's territory you can understand each other's priorities and and pursuits but as I see it now the the free prior and informed consent seems to be going with the majority of first nations are the ones that are are most vocal or finding favor uh with the government and of course I'm mindful of the work that's been going on on the uh management and oversight committee of first nations but I was quite surprised to see the minister announce that that was one of the big reasons that kinder Morgan got approved and of course so that represents a group of first nations coming together and expressing opinion but it doesn't take into account the rights of those people that stand opposed and certainly the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous people does not say free prior and informed consent only if you're in a majority um it talks about free prior and informed so the slave would says I think not I think I know that their rights need to be respected their wishes need to be embraced they have an answer for free prior and informed consent but what we're witnessing right now with this being approved by the federal government is what I've always said about consultation processes I believe that Canadians want things to be fair they want it to be just and to have adequate processes I have yet to counter myself for many leaders at all that can say that the consultation process with government has ever led to a meaningful stopping of an initiative supported by either crown and industry and so that's what I always say to people that say f pic or free prior and informed consent does not represent it counter-argument to that is consultation has always led to the answer yes or very just it's all but I do believe that we need now is an effort to bring First Nations together along the school or service engagement really arrive at free prior and informed consent that represents everybody's indigenous rights thank you thank you Chamberlain we have another question here for you can you tell us what you think about the potential for the federal government to expropriate First Nations land for the Kinder Morgan pipeline well the concern that I've always had when I hear the government speak about major resource development of course is when they talk about it being in the national interest and when I think when I believe when I hear those words spoken by any level of government that of course is national it's federal that in their minds gives them the authority to override anything and everything and I know that today when you drive down the highway or when you see perhaps unfavorable components of major projects you find them on reserve and so the government has zigzagged in the past to make sure that they land on reserve land but I think with the changing landscape today around the UN Declaration on Rights Indigenous people I think that not I think I know that First Nations would stand up and be vehemently opposed if there's going to be an expropriation of reserve lands if there's going to be laying down of things which is completely unwelcome in our territories and as I stated in the previous webinar that I don't think there's a First Nation in Canada top priority for economic development is I want a pipeline through my territory put everything at risk that we rely on and where I draw my identity from there are ones that accept it as inevitable but there is still the same resolve among many many First Nations and British Columbians and Canadians that just simply don't want to see this project go ahead that the risks far away the benefits and I don't believe the technology has advanced to the point now where we can have any measure of comfort in terms of this being a six successful building this project thanks we've got a couple of questions here from folks about banks and boycotts folks might not know that Kinder Morgan is as a company not doing that well financially and they needed to go out and borrow almost all of the 7.4 billion dollars to build this pipeline and the vast majority of that has come from Canada's Big Five Bank in particular the Toronto Minions that's paid a big role in financing this project and we saw earlier this year some work from STAN but also from the Treaty Alliance against tar sands expansion this the Union of BC and the Indians chooses a key player in and lead now and some other groups working to put pressure on Toronto Dominion to stop funding these kind of projects I think we're going to see more of that in the next little while and people should look out for from us and from other folks to get updates on how we can put pressure on the banks that are are funding these projects and making them possible to to go ahead um all right I see we've got a question here uh from about the C-51 and how that affects potential protesters Chief Chamberlain I know you the organization did a little work on C-51 do you have any thoughts on how it might impact this particular project well I think with Bill C-51 I mean it lands squarely in that that area that the federal government is going to be reviewing in relationship to respecting of Aboriginal rights as defined in the Constitution again like myself like many leaders and many Canadians are are now awaiting the outcome of the work of the federal government in modifying or or doing away with various pieces of legislation that the Stephen Harper government thought was very beneficial I'm believing that the Liberal government is going to be while I'm remaining hopeful that there's going to be a thorough and comprehensive analysis with a thorough and comprehensive response I do know that it wasn't the first out the gate it hasn't been as positive as we had hoped but I think that the continued pressure in the voice of Canadians needs to be heard I've stated many times if there's one thing that's incredibly sacred to every politician that you vote and so if we can organize and make sure that we have a large scale as large as we can make it I mean we all have different circles of influence and to ensure that we have the communication and public statements and twitter and facebook and so on just to make sure that that the message is out there Sven I see a question here from Don Morrison about the collective land use planning I'd like to answer to I know that when we start to consider land use planning I know myself as a First Nation leader when we've discussed this and envisioned this it would have to include all of our hereditary chiefs it would need to include our community it needs to include people beyond the reserve boundaries and I believe now that when we start to react or respond to the challenge from minister Jody Wilson-Raybould about who are the appropriate title holders for our territories that we have to begin those discussions for ourselves within our communities of course that begins with talking with our families and making sure that the council is responsive to those situations so I would like to see and what I propose to Mr Eifford is that we look at all the land use plans because now we can view those not simply as a tool to engage with the provincial government but actually can be viewed as an expression of a First Nations interest or what they wish to see within their title lands and of course that is then supported by the Chilcotin where our lands are territorial in nature it then also responds to the UN Declaration of Rights Indigenous people and as been mentioned by the federal government this commitment now from the feds and the provincial government on UN DRIP squarely puts the ball back in our court to prepare ourselves to make sure that we have the proper mechanisms in place and the appropriate governance structures to ensure that our membership or what gets spoken by leaders is in fact representative of all the membership not just ones that are on and off reserve so Dawn I hope that I hope that answers your question. Okay I see a question here from Trevor seeking some clarification around the QIT led core contracting and then using CLAC as the employee representative we've actually been in touch with the DC building trade and it it's based on their information that we believe these jobs will likely be through CLAC. We are at one o'clock just a little over so I'm going to ask Chief Chamberlain for some closing thoughts and then we'll wrap up we're hoping to hold more webinars like this as this issue heats up over the fall so please look out for invites in your inbox and if we didn't answer some of your questions feel free to reach out to us by email and we'll do our best to get back to you and answer all. Okay well Ben thank you for for your assistance on this important webinar today and I'm again I can't say it enough I want to thank everybody that's taken the time to to be a part of this and become more informed of how it is that you can actively participate and that always be mindful of your own individual rights just as Aboriginal people are very mindful of our Aboriginal rights. If there's one thing I'd like to leave everybody with is the fact that on September 9th at 1pm at the Vancouver Art Gallery organized by climate convergence there is going to be the answer is still no and it's going to be a rally of course that's going to be focused on the topic at hand I'm going to review my calendar and I'm really hoping that I have that time open so I can be there but I very much encourage everybody to make time and whether it's on September 9th at 1pm at the Vancouver Art Gallery or wherever these things are going to be held is that we show up in numbers we ensure are as broad a group as and representative of British Columbians can be there so we can have that message and I encourage everyone that's on this webinar to find ways to support First Nations in terms of advancing our vision for our lands and title and to become knowledgeable of the 10 principles of reconciliation which the federal government is pursuing because that is going to be where justice is found for First Nations and it's going to be able to put us in a place where we are going to be able to speak to our territories and I think that by and large we're finding a lot of unity with Canadians and protection of the environment so thank you very much for this opportunity


Your Coca-Cola program. Claudia, brought to you transcribed Monday through Friday by your friendly neighbor who bottles Coca-Cola. Listen, relax. Help yourself to a frosty bottle of coke. And now, Claudia. They saw, they met, they married each other six whole weeks ago. Now it's a Monday morning. The beginning of another seven days together for Claudia and David. Morning, particularly Monday mornings, were made to get up in. And so... Go back to sleep again. It's only half past six. Don't be silly. You've got that all your poison you think you can have in here. Yes, but I can get breakfast on the road. How quick, Claudia? I'm not. Oh, here they are. See you out of the bathroom in a minute. Hey, hey, Claudia. It'd be simpler if you'd just stay in bed. Let me get in there and take my shower. Don't worry. Not the kind of one who lets her husband take breakfast out. That's nice. Now run and fix the breakfast quick. Right. Well, we need the door open while you shave so we can talk back and forth. I don't like to talk back and forth while I shave. And you can just listen. But I like company while I work. No. Hey, Claudia. Yes? What happened to the razor? Yes, and I know you didn't shave with it, but did you, did you use it to clean something with? Oh, what? The windows yesterday when I was washing them. Well, I want you to leave my razor alone. You're not helping me not to brag. Starting you've got to learn that one of the things a man doesn't like is to have his razor tampered with. It's an unwritten law of marriage. How much did you raise a cost? It's not the cost. It's the principle of the family. Suppose I didn't have another blade. Well, David, you have, though, haven't you? David, answer, have you? Yeah, I have. Well, then you're very inconsiderate to make a fuss to know good reason. I'm inconsiderate. Just because I happen to have another blade, I'm in the wrong. Oh, you're impossible. Why did you marry me if I'm impossible? I don't know. I just like impossible people, I guess. That's good. David, you almost had a fight, do you know that? I was in Harrisburg. Are you putting any time yet? No. Well, let me know when you are. What's it to you? Nothing to me but everything to be able.  They just might when it comes to table. Eggs are cooked with a clock, not by a man's tie. Anyway, I'm nowhere near up to my tie. I'm only at my socks. Only at your socks? At the moment, I have on one brown sock and one blue sock. We men are wearing them the same color this year. Oh, dear, you must have taken them from the wrong pile. Are there two piles? Of course there are. Some of your socks had holes, so I made two bundles. Oh, my love, with socks, you always roll them up in pairs, but match. Not just any two socks that come to hand. But David, they're rolled up that way because they don't match.  Oh, Eureka. What happened? I found the other blue sock. Oh, that was very clever of you. There's a hole in it. And actually, you took it from the wrong pile. Oh, my darling angel, I could bring your neck. Well, checkmate. I like it in my neck. I haven't got time to learn any more. Come along to breakfast. Hmm, doesn't the coffee smell good? No, it's very strong. David! What? It's boiled away. Never mind. Yes, I do mind. I'll add more. I don't like coffee with water added. You won't know it. But I do know it. Look, darling, I have to go. But you can't go on an empty stomach. You'd be surprised. Goodbye. David, come back. You didn't kiss me. I haven't time. But David, promise me to get breakfast on the road. That's what I wanted to do in the first place. What's the matter with you? Nothing, mama. Don't tell me nothing. We were dragging along the street like we'd lost our last friend. Chopping makes me a little tired, I guess. You didn't plan it. Come on, out with it. I'm bothering you. Nothing. What did you and David call about this morning? Mama, how did you know we had a call? Who's called for this? Your call. My call? Oh, dear. One thing I don't want is to cause any trouble between you and David. Don't be silly. He adores you. He thinks you're just about perfect. Then what do you mean it was my call? You should have taught me how to dine socks better. It was his socks that started it. Mama Donning gets me down. I have absolutely no talent for it. How do you know? Have you tried? Not yet. I haven't gotten around to it. Have you a Donning maid and Donning needles in the house? I have regular eggs and regular needles, and that's enough for any shop. Mama, look. Look at what? That pet shop. There's a monkey in the window. Come on. Claudia, stop pulling me. I'm not interested in the monkey. I'm interested in buying some Donning cotton to patch up your marriage. But I have another idea to patch up my marriage. Mama, David and I need a common interest. But as? Such as something living, something healthy. Something we can both know. You're not supposed to be tested a pet shop by yourself. Oh, wait for me. I'll go in with you. Mama, the puppy's in canting. There it is. Come along outside.  All pet shops smell funny. But I don't have to say them. What can I do for you, ladies? Nice little Bomeranian puppy? I don't think so. My husband doesn't like small dogs. Say, I got an idea. How'd he like a new fondant? You mean... You mean one of those great big black dogs that look like lions? They do look like lions. Come to think of it. And say, have I got a few of them? I don't see you. Where is he? I got him tied up in the backyard. He's too big to keep it in stock. I don't know him. Please do.  A dog that looks like a lion? A dog that's too big to keep in the store? Oh, it doesn't hurt to look at him.  Claudia, get out of this way. I'm down. I'm down. I'm down. I'm calling my husband. Claudia, are you hurt? Look, he didn't make it down. He's back for it. Oh, my. I'm awfully sorry, ma'am. Let me help you out. Did you hurt yourself? No. Just went down all of a sudden. Just put his paws on my shoulder and down I went. I'm awfully glad he didn't hit you, mama. I'm shaking in a real end of the day. Come on, ma'am. I'll take you back to the yard where you belong. Oh, the lady wants to see you. That's the way you are. No, no, don't. He didn't mean anything wrong. He was just friendly, wasn't he? Hmm. Oh, mama, look at these eyes. They're beautiful. Hmm. They're gorgeous.   If there's any bager, I ain't met him. If your fellow weighs over 200 pounds. And he's gentle. Oh, you could put your hand right in his mouth, lady. Or go on.  He won't bite you. Oh, no, no, thank you. I'll take your word for it. He has the face of an angel. He has the face of an angel. It is a he, isn't it? It is a he, all right. Oh, that's good. Claudia, what possible interest is that to you? Because I'm going to buy him. Buy him? Mama, I have to have him. David will divorce you for a lunatic. You'll not only wreck your marriage, but you'll wreck your apartment. Hi there, anybody home? Oh, David. I didn't hear you. Why not? I was in the bag. I helped you out. David, my favorite chocolate. I bought you some, too. You did? Mm-hmm. Big guess is what it is. Oh, oh. Animal, vegetable or mineral? It's animal. What kind of animal? It's the long story. Make it short. You see, I wanted to cement our marriage. You wanted to what? Well, you went off this morning without kissing. I know, and I'm sorry that's why I brought you the candy. And that's why I bought you the dog. Did you say dog?  Listen, Claudia, there's a couple of things in life a man likes to take out for himself and one of them is his dog. I know, but you see, I happened to pass a pet shop. You bought a dog at a pet shop? I certainly didn't buy him a dog store. Oh, good night. Look, Claudia, you buy canaries at a pet shop, but if you want a man-sized dog, you go to a kennel in the country. Well, we couldn't make turn him around. I didn't pay for him. Well, that shows a little sense anyway. But he's in the back after supper. Walk in the bedroom. What kind is he? Peek-a-need? No. What's the other name you usually buy in a pet shop? Oh, Parmarine. Oh, fair buns, look. Well, I suppose I ought to be grateful it's not one of those white toy pools. Oh, no, it's bigger than a toy pool. Not now, David. I'll open the door quietly, and you better stand as you're back after lunch. Why? Because you'll see it. Hey! Get off! Get off! What is it about that?   I won't be able to sit down for a week. Wait a minute. Give him a lap chance to get up again. He's just playing. He always knocks you over when he plays. Holy smokes.  It was done in accident. I'll say it was. We'll take him back. Over my dead body will take him back. He's magnificent. Look at that conformation. Oh, lady, you've got good taste in husbands and better taste in dogs. David, do you like him? Do I like him? I always wanted either a den or a new friend when I was a dog. Expensive. He cost over $500. But the man charged him $25. $25? Giving him a word. Oh, I know it is. But it was David. We oughtn't to fool ourselves. It's not the initial cost. It's the upkeep. He's knocked over two lamps already. And I bought pounds and pounds of hamburgers for him. I gave him five pounds for supper. From four and a half, really, I let that half come to life. Are you trying to tell me we can't keep him? Oh, David, I want to. But I was afraid you wouldn't. We're only three. You can have my bear. Then you can have mine. Saddle. Here, come here, old fella. Let me see your teeth. He's on the top. Oh, look at him. Look at that. He wants to fight. Careful, David. Watch the table. Later. You want to fight, huh? Exciting week in the life of Claudia and David. Big moments to remember. Little moments to enjoy with pleasant friends. Good times and delicious refreshments just naturally go together. That's why it's always a fine idea to keep ice-cold Coca-Cola in the refrigerator, ready to serve at any time. And tomorrow, when you're shopping at the grocery store, you'll find it mighty pleasant to pause at the familiar red Coca-Cola cooler. Have a bottle of ice-cold Coke. Maybe with a neighbor you've met there. When you shop, shop refreshed. Every day, Monday through Friday, Claudia comes to you transcribed with the best wishes of your friendly neighbor who bottles Coca-Cola. So listen again tomorrow at the same time. Another Coca-Cola show is on the air every Sunday for your enjoyment. The pause that refreshes on the air with the music of Percy Faith, the Coca-Cola Orchestra, and guest stars. Consult your newspaper for time and station. And now, au revoir. And remember, whoever you are, whatever you do, wherever you may be, when you think of refreshments, think of Coca-Cola. For ice-cold Coca-Cola makes any pause the pause that refreshes. Brought to you by the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York Incorporated.


This is covering the spread part of the Fandall podcast network There is an old song that goes I fought the law and the law one and that can often apply to Betty markets as well because typically when you are super far off in the markets You're probably the one who is wrong Betty markets tend to be very very efficient So if you disagree vehemently with of what the market is saying There's a good chance. You're the one who's actually wrong and not the market And that is a scary proposition for today because there are a good number of strikeout props Or I cannot comprehend why the market is where it is. So Coffee out to the ply markets are efficient. I could be very wrong with all this But there are some spots where I do feel like the market may be a bit off So we're gonna dive into where those spots are for today also talk some muddy lines for tonight to get you ready It talks in baseball for today. This is covering the spread right here on the Fandall podcast network My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a managing editor of digital media for Fandall research here to break down Monday nights MLB slate and break down my favorite money lines and strikeout props that I like over at Fandall sports book We'll dive into all that here in just one second But first a reminder to make sure you're subscribed to covering the spread wherever you get your podcast We had JJ's that car racing on last Friday talking about some season-long player props He likes over at Fandall sportsbook We want to get JJ's insights on this year talking about building projections and much more find that on the covering the spread podcast feed as Well as the Fandall YouTube page and Fandall TV plus Fandall TV plus now available not just Apple TV Roku and Amazon fire TV But also you can go to Fandall comm slash watch and pull it up there to see up and Adams Logging into your Fandall account and also covering the spread and the solo shot Get ready for NFL season with incredible offers from Fandall America's number one sports book right now new customers Can bet $5 and get $200 in bonus bets guaranteed plus all customers who bet $5 will get $100 on NFL Sunday ticket from YouTube and YouTube TV Now is the best time to join Fandall the app is easy to use you can be on everything from spreads to player props and more Fandall a visual partner of the NFL must be 21 plus and present in select states. I Lost my spot Fandall suffering online sports wagering in Kansas under an agreement with Kansas Star Casino LLC First online real money wager only $10 first deposit required bonus issued is non Which rubble bonus bets that expire seven days after receipt restricts his apply see terms at sportsbook.fandall.com gambling problem call 100 gambler or visit Fandall comm slash Rg in Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Tennessee and Virginia call 1-800 next step protects next step to 533 for 2 in Arizona<PHONE_NUMBER> or visit ccpg.org slash chat in Connecticut 1-800 9 with it in Indiana 1-800 522-4700 or visit ksgamblinghealth.com in Kansas 1-877-770 stop in Louisiana MD gambling health at orc in Maryland 1-800 gambler.net in West Virginia call 1-800 522-4700 in Wyoming Hope is here was a gambling helpline ma.org or call<PHONE_NUMBER> for 24 7 support in Massachusetts He ain't call 1-8778 open wire text open Y in New York NFL Sunday ticket offer ends 918-23 no refunds terms and embargoes imply hundred dollars off NFL Sunday ticket not YouTube TV YouTube TV base plan required to watch YouTube TV Redemption requires a Google account and current from a payment commercial use is excluded Let's dig in now to tonight's NLB say and start things off with the money lines I like over at Fandals sports book and begins with a game with a couple of teams of playoff aspirations That is he Boston Red Sox Taking on the Houston Astros we've seen some movement in this game when I looked at it this morning It was the Red Sox to win at minus 120 their plot or they are now down to minus 132 That puts their implied win-outs up to 56.9 percent My model has them at 60.6 percent to win so make sure you shop around as always see if you can get that minus 120 out there somewhere, but I Still got enough of a cushion where I can still feel good about the Red Sox You're again 60.6 percent for me and the new implied odds at minus 132 are 56.9 percent reason I was on the Red Sox to begin with is because of the issues occur the struggles of Christian Javier has had Javier really rough summer and The struggles for him began when he started to cut back on his curve ball usage So I thought that maybe that was an explanation Maybe there was an injury with Javier where he couldn't throw that pitch effectively So he wasn't using it But then last time out Javier did go back to that curve ball He was facing Boston this is the same team he'll face tonight and It didn't help him very much Still had just three walks compared to three strikeouts That have three earned runs across five innings and that game was at home For the full season now Javier has a 4.93 skill interactive era with a 4.73 expected era So Javier went back to the curve ball did not get better results So I kind of can't explain Why things have been so rough for him recently He's facing Boston again That also does mean it's a reefing match up here for Chris sale and sale Vila went back up a bit last week And I thought that was somewhat encouraging because he'd been way down the start before that so Maybe it's not an injury. I don't know it was not encouraging regardless for Chris sale and the answers did get to him So maybe we'll just see a lot of offense in this game the total is at 10 runs justifiably I think for tonight, but I do think the red sox are the preferred side here given that Javier Has not had the same peripherals through his struggles as Chris sale has so I'd go with Boston here still value minus 132 But as always make sure you shop around And try to identify the best price for that Second money line for tonight is the minnesota twins taking on the cleveland guardians The twins money line currently at vandal sportsbook is minus 164 and I do show value there My model is the twins win odds at 68.4 percent versus their implied odds at 62.1 percent went to phasing xavian curry who Has had some rough underlying numbers despite okay results as he has been getting stretched out We've had nine outings on curry where he's been Getting his pitch count up very slowly yet a game last week that was suspended because of rain So kind of nothing could do about that one but across those nine outings Curry with the increased pitch counts has led up a 46.7 percent hard hit rates with a 54.9 percent fly ball rate And now you put those rough bad at ball numbers up against the twins team that despite the fact they adore striking out they can make a lot of hard contact and Make your life pretty tough because they have a 112 w RC plus against righties on the current active roster That is including the massive strike out rate, which means that when they make contact They're doing very good things with it twins are starting kenta myata here Myata hasn't the best results always but 3.26 skill interactive era from myata since he returned from the il So cleveland's offense has been better overall recently than they were earlier on this year the w RC plus against righties up to 93 right now I still think the twins should be a bit more heavily favored here So I do like the twins money line which is currently minus 164 at fan dual sports book I do think if you don't want to pay the minus 164 there are ways you could potentially tie this in I showed some value on kenta myata strikeout prop over 5 and add plus 104 It is a very low strikeout matchup Which is why that number is so low But if you want to tie that together uh with the twins money line at minus 164 a same game parlayer That would be plus 188 it's not the best number by any means But I would understand if you wanted to go that route personally as you know prefer to play things straight up for the most part I do think there that is a route if you wanted to consider it Also could look at some twins uh home run props Looking at things right now don't see a ton. I really like personally so again Would prefer to go with things straight up But you can look at the myata strikeout prop look at some home run props If you don't want to lay the minus 164 straight up with the minnesota twins Let's dig in now to some strikeout props and let's dig into a game where I am way off from market for both the starting pitchers In this one that is the a's taking on the mariners and the strikeout props here are Brian woo under six and a half strikeouts at minus 116 And kyle mutler under five and add strikeouts minus 132 I am way far off from both these numbers and the biggest one for me is woo because it's a pitch count related recommendation for me because He came off the il last week and it was a pretty short stint He was on the il for uh mist 18 days came back last week and Didn't ever rehab start so i didn't project it for 70 pitches there He threw 65 and the typical progression is he had about 15 on for one start to the next So I have woo projected for 80 pitches for tonight And it was a forearm issue for woo So maybe that number is even lower than what i'm projecting But if I put woo's strike or pitch count projection to 80 pitches I have a strikeout projection at 4.64 again His strikeout prop is six and a half with minus 116 on the under the only way I could understand having woo's uh Projection this high is if you hadn't projected to get a full leash and I don't see how that happens given me through Just 65 last week just for funsies. Let's uh, let's plug in a full pitch count here for brian woo's Let's put him up to I've got an 80 Let's increase that number to 100 and see where I have woo if I were to do that If I put woo's strikeout projection up to 100 I've still got him at 5.8 strikeouts So even if I give him 100 pitches I'm not getting the six and a half as being the proper number for this so that tells me something's up again If you fight the market the market's probably gonna win But I don't really understand why this number is so high So I will take woo under six and a half strikeouts at minus 116 at vandal sportsbook other side of that game as mentioned is kyle muller under five and a half minus 132 and again I don't get this one personally I get I can kind of understand it better than I can with woo because it's a very high strikeout matchup The maritors have a 27.5 strikeout right on their active roster against lefties this year But muller has gone under gone over five and a half strikeouts one time this entire year You face seattle once they were a high strikeout team back on may 22nd as well And in that game just three strikeouts there across five innings now in muller's defense He has had a demotion to the minor sense Then maybe his strikeout rate ticked up up there to explain why this number is so high right now But in triple a muller strikeout rate was 16.9 percent So even with the matchup being what it is. I have muller projected for 3.7 strikeouts tonight Again, he's numbers five and a half at minus 132 So I wanted to explain to you my rationale behind having my projections where they are so that you can You can kind of weigh that versus the mark and say okay Is jim the one who's wrong or is the market the one who's wrong because it's very possible. I'm wrong That's how sports betting works. You're wrong a lot But that's my rationale for being low on both these guys for tonight They are in the same games if you want to pair them together and take the two strikeout props together The same game problem that is plus 225 you can do that But I want to play things straight up with woo and with muller Taking woo under six and a half at minus 116 and taking muller under five and a half minus 132 Those are the two spots where I am most off in the market Where I'm having the hardest time envisioning why those numbers are there Let's talk about two other strikeout props I do like for tonight though One of them is that course field and course feels a spot that does tend to drag strikeouts down in part because You let up a lot of runs there and may not be able to go deep in games But also because movement is different at course field than it is elsewhere because the elevation is so high and the atmosphere is so Thit so we do tend to see strikeouts go down I have brice elder under four and a half strikeouts minus 150 which you can get right now at vandal sportsbook And this was a bit of a surprise to me because I think that my model tends to undersell the course effect with regards to strikeouts So whenever I see an under a course field, it always kind of does entice me Because there are more routes there could be because of the atmosphere, you know They let up a lot of runs Maybe the pitches don't move as much and they make a lot of contact multiple routes to an under there As for elder his strikeout numbers have been on the decline recently and That's before we account for course field Uh, we look at elders past 11 starts his velocity has been down on his sinker in that time and With the decrease velo on his sinker elder is just a 13 strikeout rate He has gone over four and a half strikeouts just twice in an 11 start sample So I have elder projected well below this number at 3.3 strikeouts. So again, I am way off of the market I can better understand why this one is here than I can with woo or with muller because it is the rockies They're a very bad offense elder has been effective Despite the lack of strikeouts because he is so skilled at suppressing hard contact But not a big enough strikeout guy for me to justify a number of four and a half Even a minus 150 on the under when he's at course field So I do think elder under four and a half minus 150 a spot where I get why the market is where it is But I still want to take the under personally for tonight The final one is one where I'm actually a bit more aligned at the market But do you still like the under in part because the under is plus 126 that is on Grayson Rodriguez Under five and a half strikeouts plus 126 at fandals sports book He's taking on the chicago white socks tonight and the white socks offense Obviously has not had a good year But they're also not a high strikeout offense the active roster for the white socks 22.2 percent strikeout right against righties for this year And that's a slightly better than average number. So not a high strikeout team despite their issues If we look at Rodriguez since he came back up He has pitched really really well and it's led to me being on the oil's money line at times when Rodriguez is pitched but We got 3.24. Yeah, right. So he's been very good And it's it's also correlated with the changes pitch mix because he's used his cutter less often So I think that is the most relevant sample for Rodriguez and looking at him since he came back up But Rodriguez hasn't had more than six strikeouts in any of those seven games He has gone under five and a half and four out of seven I haven't projected for 5.14 strikeouts tonight. So His odds are going under five and a half are greater than 50 percent for me We're getting plus money on the under at plus 126 So this one i'm a lot closer to the market that I am with the others But again, we're getting plus 126 in the under. I think that's pretty enticing. So I do think that that's the right way to go taking the under on Rodriguez at uh, plus 126 So the strikeout props for tonight Um Over at fangirl sportsbook. I like Rodriguez under five and a half plus 126 I like Kyle Muller under five and a strikeouts minus 132 Bryce elder under four and a strikeouts minus 150 and brian woo under six and a half strikeouts minus 116 as mentioned again Always proceeded caution when you're way off in the market if you're building out a model and Don't align the market at all probably going to be a red flag I've run this model for a while. That's why I feel more okay um Being off from the market and having some confidence in it But you know, you do want to proceed with caution when that is the case That's where my model is leading me for tonight That's all we have for baseball for today But I do got to go back through last week recapping the weeklong recommendations From here on the show as an accountability segment for us here at covering the spread Our first college football show this season was a successful one Our guest as always was dr. Ed fang you can find him on twitter at the power rank and check him out On his website the power rank dot com Ed said he won a Notre Dame minus 20 and a half against navy in ireland And they would have almost covered 40 and a half because Notre Dame won that one 42 to 3 pretty easy coast to a win for adding that one. So a good way to start things off with ed We're going to talk week one in college football coming up on wednesday. It is wild. Oh, we are already there Our epl guest was austin kass from match week number three find austin on twitter at austin kass He is a senior editor far from the research and we did get finally some regression here With austin the two bets for manchester city over two and a half goals even money and new castle the win at plus 115 man city scored two But those came in the 63rd and 88th minutes and they couldn't get a third in there So under two and a half did hit there for man city and the new castle lost two to one So still four and two start to the year for austin, which is very impressive regression was going to come eventually So we'll get awesome back here on the show later on this week talk match week number four Good start overall for the year despite this past week for austin I had nascar and formula one for this week nascar and datona formula one in the netherlands No broken risks in nascar. Let's start things off there. That's a lot cheerier for nascar I had kevin harvick to podium at 10 to 1 eric jones to win at 35 to 1 and Heading to the final restart harvick was leading and there were two laps left He was leading the two rfk cars brad keselowski and chris busher Were on the outside harvick had chase elliott behind him and elliott Didn't give him a good push on the restart So harvick fell behind the rfk cars got linked they ran away and they were gonna win So harvick is running third still in contention to cash the podium bet at 10 to 1 But then elliott did what he had to do, you know, he needed to Get out of line try to win this race to in order to try to qualify for the playoffs So he ditched harvick harvick from about to nine did not cash the podium That was disappointing But he was in contention with two laps to go leading the race the two laps to go Thought he had a chance But was not meant to be chris busher winning his third race in the past five, which is incredible He's always been a guy. I've liked a lot. So happy to see busher doing that Even though it did not help me catch a ticket on saturday eric jones 35 to 1 Ran pretty well the entire night, but finished 18th. So nothing on the nascar side of things In f1. I originally had two bets Those were daniel rickardo top 10 at plus 4 10 and carlo signs to finish top 6 at plus 1 15 Ricardo broke his wrist in practice on friday So he did not race and I feel like I cursed him because on friday I had rickardo, uh break his wrist and I had Ryan seag in the extended series race didn't talk about this in the show But talked about in the betting guide over uh on fandal research Seag failed inspection three times had to start at the back had to um Had to do a pass through penalty to start the race That was not great and then also rally herbs to blew a tire after searing issues immediately in that race So friday, I cursed everybody I touched when it comes to nascar when it comes to racing betting. So Sorry, daniel rick. It is probably my fault. You broke that wrist sounds like he'll miss just one more race, but pretty tough Now fandal's house rules rule that as a void bet because rickardo did not start the formation lap That is the rule for formula one for nascar I believe if they attempt to qualify then the then the bet counts But for f1 if they don't start the formation lap the bet is void And so that should have been voided. I bet rickardo had a different sports book and they rated that as a loss Which was incorrect. So if you see that reach out to customer support. I did that they corrected it, but um Know the house rules of where you're betting especially when it comes to racing because it can be a bit more weird Know the house rules make sure they're being followed because They make mistakes not trying to make mistakes, but it does occasionally happen If it does happen reach out to customer support and make sure it gets amended The other one was uh, carlo signs Not very fast in practice, uh, but the rain came during qualifying and signs is a good driver So he qualified sixth there. He ran top six the entire race. He had good strategy whereas his teammate charle claire did not Um Ferrari got a Ferrari once again and signs wound up finishing fifth in that race Not an easy win because he had lewis hamilton and lando norris right on uh, right in his gearbox towards the end of the race But he was riding the edge the whole time did cash it at plus 115. So got the f1 there got the void on riccardo Got close on nascar, but couldn't quite get there That's gonna wrap things up for today here on covering the spread I won't talk baseball for today because I realized this is my last week to talk baseball for the year So squeezing that and I'll probably talk some baseball once again tomorrow as a result because I don't want to give it up Just quite yet. So make sure you subscribe to covering the spread to get these just as they're posted each and every week day Also, check us out on fan dual youtube and fan dual tv plus If you have any questions for me, I am on twitter at jim sonnis j i m s a n n e s You can also follow the fan dual podcast network at fan dual podcast and check out fan dual research at fan dual research Want to thank you all for tuning in for today. Good luck with your mlb bets for tonight We'll talk to you once again tomorrow This has been covering the spread right here on the fan dual podcast network


Hey beauties, I'm Bianca Renee and you're watching Bianca Renee today and today. I'm back with another skin care update and aloe vera challenge now if you guys saw my very first aloe vera video I did an aloe vera challenge why I challenged myself to rub real raw aloe vera on my face for one week straight every morning and every night and then I wanted to see how Amazing my skin was gonna look because there's so many YouTube videos. I like are claiming miracles after one week I mean, I tried it you guys saw my results if you haven't seen that video You should watch it it got over like two million views. So thank you for watching that video, but I didn't see like an extremely dramatic Change but a lot of you guys said you did now after that video I ended up going to an esthetician who really got my skin under control I've been going to an esthetician named Mary Scott and she has miraculously cleared my skin so Much if you haven't seen my other acne videos, you got to check those out. It was severe Seriously discovered in red zits and now my skin is so smooth and just a million times better So one of the tips that I got from Mary Scott was to use ice on my face So then I started the ice challenge where I then took an ice cube and rubbed it on my face every morning and night After you cleanse but before you apply your skin care products And that will help your products penetrate deeper into your skin and help with inflammation redness fine lines and wrinkles So then I thought What if I combined the aloe vera with the ice and created aloe vera cubes mind So I decided to do this and I went to YouTube and I realized I'm not the first person to think of this thing and many people were Doing it in many different ways some people grab the aloe vera They took out all the actual aloe vera goodness put it in a blender then put it in ice trays Some added water and then they made literally aloe vera ice cubes Then I saw another way where you just cut up the aloe vera and throw it in the freezer And as the lazy person that I am that's the one I decided to do so in today's video I'm gonna show you how I cut up this aloe vera plant Kept it in the freezer created frozen little aloe vera ice cubes and applied it to my face Every day so the first thing I did I went to Whole Foods and I got this large aloe vera leaf I've only been able to find them at Whole Foods and food for less But feel free to buy them wherever you find them and leave a comment down below if you have other store recommendations Beside your own backyard then the first thing I did when I got home was rinse it off in the sink And then I want to cut off this ugly little like white part right here. We don't need that part We just saw the good aloe vera so cut that off if you're old enough to do so safely We're also gonna cut off all this little spiky spikes on the sides as well And look at all that aloe vera goodness just waiting for us inside Now we're gonna cut them into even smaller pieces about maybe like an inch in width all along the entire leaf Look at the aloe vera So beautiful now we're gonna cut off the side Just one of them and I cut that in half and then as you'll see this will be our little aloe vera ice cube Just ready to be frozen then I continue to do this for the rest of the pieces Then I grabbed a tray with foil and I dumped all the aloe vera cubes right on there And then I separated them so they aren't touching so they don't freeze together After that was complete. I then put them all in the freezer. I Ended up buying a second aloe vera leaf So I just did it again to make some more cubes and this time I put them on a plate And I also decided to cover it in saran wrap Then I added batch number two to the freezer I Left my cubes in the freezer overnight and voila look at our little aloe vera ice cubes They're so cute and I could not wait to use them and notice that when I use the saran wrap I created like all this little frost bite on top and they were stuck to the plate So I think I preferred putting them on the foil because they didn't stick to the plate Then I kept all of my cubes in a Ziploc bag So I have easy access to them every morning and every night And here is the close-up of the frozen cube once again that I'll be rubbing on my face every day So here is my skin on day one not too bad The side looks pretty clear Forehead's not too bad to have some darker scars on my lower neck And I will have to say that the aloe vera doesn't have the best smell It kind of smells like body odor to be completely honest But after you rub it on and it dries you don't smell it anymore But this is gonna be good for healing your scars acne Implementation and also makes your skin very smooth and moisturized So every day I tried to wear the aloe vera for as long as possible So I'd probably either apply it before or after the gym then if I wasn't going anywhere I kept it on all day long then I'd rinse it off and then do it again at night time And I let it sit on my skin even overnight while I slept Between regular aloe vera and frozen aloe vera I definitely prefer using the frozen cubes instead. It's a lot less messy and you're getting that nice cold sensation Which is gonna help the skin plus the added benefits of the aloe vera Now by day four I was getting really irritated with this one's it So I wanted to try going back to just the pure ice on its own So I rubbed a huge ice cube across my face for at least about 30 seconds And then I added the frozen aloe vera as well So I kind of want to see what this little double combo was gonna do I don't know if it really made a difference, but it might have helped penetrate the aloe vera a little bit more Now at this point is day 35 and I have done a mixture of wearing it all day Wearing it all night wearing it for 30 minutes rinsing it off I've tried a bunch of different things But I noticed I was getting a little bit of a breakout here on my cheek and these were just getting out of control And confession I end up popping them which is why I have these scars now as punishment Don't tell Mary Scott now I started to get frustrated because of this little breakout I was having and I told myself I was not going to risk getting all of my acne back out of Everything I've done to make it this clear Just for the sake of YouTube. I'm sorry So I stopped using the aloe vera for two days and I went back to my products that Mary Scott has recommended for me Which is a sulfur product and a mendelic acid. I'm supposed to switch off between the two each night so one night I use my sulfur the next night I use my mendelic acid and Then after I kind of got this more treated with some real Medication then I went back to my aloe vera for day six six and today is day seven I did use the aloe vera this morning. I left it on for at least an hour But here is the honest truth about my personal experience with using aloe vera So overall I do think my skin looks very healthy very glowy. My acne has been under control It feels very moisturized, but I don't think that aloe vera does enough For my skin to prevent acne. I have very acne prone skin So I've learned that if I just use the aloe vera and nothing else Which is what I try to do to make a real experiment for you guys That's not gonna be enough to stop my acne from coming So although it may help with the healing process of my acne or my scars It's not strong enough to prevent it for me personally So what I'm gonna continue to do with the remainder of my aloe vera ice cubes is I'm gonna still use my Products that Mary Scott has given me to use at night, but I'm probably gonna continue to use the aloe vera ice cubes At least in the morning I'll probably wake up wash my face apply the aloe vera wear it all throughout my workout in the morning Come home shower and then go on with my day But what about you? Have you ever used aloe vera on your skin before how well were your results? Have you tried my aloe vera challenge? Have you tried my ice challenge?  So if you enjoy my video I mean you made it this far you might as well push that subscribe button. I'm so Close to hitting three hundred thousand subscribers and all I need is you yes You has not pushed the button yet to push the button I'll make sure to keep you guys updated on my Instagram stories as I continue to use these aloe vera ice cubes And I'll see you guys in my next video. Thanks for watching beyond grenade today


Okay, guys, so you know what I've been doing recently. I just recently telling myself that I'm I'm not going to care about any of the Issues of my rating or whatever. All right, what I'm gonna do from now on in order to practice It's just make sure every week every day. I solve just one problem Okay, and it's gonna be either a that rating a thousand to a thousand two hundred and I'm gonna solve one problem every day Okay, so just make sure that throughout this next whole year that I'm gonna when I'm doing problem solving So I'm gonna solve one problem that's between a thousand to a thousand two hundred and I'm gonna make sure that every day at least I submit something Okay, so it should at least be green for all the all the values here for every day for a year Okay, so if if the if the end if by like 2022 if I still can't get to green That's something that's a huge problem. Okay. Now last year I did solve like a ton of problems I think yeah, but there were some days where I didn't submit anything at all I just took a break on October. I didn't give a crap that much November I took a little break also in the December I did it kind of went hard on December and then I think June the July I took a break May I did I did a few I solved a few problems here and there, but I Wasn't like super consistent. Okay, and also some of these problems were like 800 level problems. Yeah, I think add add two oj ladders were just kind of a waste of time, but yeah, um, I Shouldn't make a video about that why add two oj ladders are waste of time, but anyway, so from now on What I'm gonna do for the next my new goals is just everyday solve try to solve one problem and then After solving one problem try to Just just try to solve one problem every day and then sooner or later. I'm gonna I have to get at least get to Green I think I should I should be able to hit green sooner or later Currently I'm at like wavering between like 800 to a thousand I haven't at this contest I just gave up the last contest because it was too too tired and early in the morning But I think my best was like a thousand one hundred. So as long as I do like a thousand As long as I could do Do problems between a thousand to a thousand two hundred I should be able to get to green and Yeah, and I'm gonna try to up solve a BNC. I'm sure I'm trying to do like virtual contests every day And then try to up solve a BNC That should be able to get me up to green At least in a year if I still can't get to green in a year, I think I'm just gonna I don't know. I don't want to do I'm just gonna like try to change my strategy. But yeah, I don't I think like My goals for CP competitive program is actually reach expert reach blue belt I don't blue. I don't think I'm gonna try to reach purple But because at that when you reach purple It starts getting super duper complicated. I think the problems get ridiculously hard But yeah, if I just like slowly reach up to like green and then cyan and then blue I think I'm gonna stop. I think I'm gonna stop competitive programming. I just don't I think the the costs wait the benefit it comes to point where the Benefits outweigh the the the time it takes kind of outweigh the cause the cost outweigh the benefits That's what I mean. So yeah But anyway, I feel like if you get to blue you kind of it kind of could solve any interview problem anyway I hope you guys enjoy this video. These are just my goals to My goals in competitive programming Yeah, just it's just a try to solve a problem every day That's what I'm gonna try to do and then by the end of the year I should be able to get to green like it shouldn't be it shouldn't be this difficult But yeah, I know like I get I get some periods times where I go like on off on off on off that could just be like cuz just because um Yes, sometimes during a contest. I just give up easily and that's that's the problem for me But yeah, I hope you guys know this video where you can't subscribe. I'll check it out later. Peace