Okay, good morning. Thank you John and Silvatholi for joining in. We'll begin class. Can I ask John to lead in prayer please? Sure. Father, we want to thank you for this morning Lord, we submit us and give you a mighty presence. Lord, we pray as we learn today that your word go inside our hearts, inside our minds and let it bring its fruit, Lord Jesus, and we pray that we would be with an open heart to receive from you. And we also send Selenah to your mighty hands and ask Lord Jesus that you would speak through her and let your voice be heard in our ears, Lord. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. Thank you. So last class, last Wednesday we had begun looking at the doctrine of Christ and the Holy Spirit. Chapter 8, we looked at the humanity of Christ and before that we just kind of did a quick recap of what we had learned in Christology about the divinity of Jesus Christ and his humanity. And then we started looking at Lesson 8, the points given there in the notes and we looked at the humanity of Christ. We looked at Christ's virgin birth and the doctrinal importance of the virgin birth as we saw in three areas. And we looked at that salvation must ultimately come from the Lord. Salvation cannot be brought about by any human effort, human will. But it's completely the work of God. It is brought about by his power and by his what he had planned and his will. And so it's completely the work of God and it's there is no human effort in the work of salvation. And the second area we saw was that the virgin birth made it possible to unite deity and humanity in one person that is in Jesus Christ. So we see that in Jesus, he was a fully man, fully God. He was 100% God, 100% man. We see that in him full humanity and full deity existed in perfect unity and in oneness. And it was made possible because of the virgin birth because he was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit. And also virgin birth made it possible that Christ was was truly human in the sense that he did not inherit any sin. Unlike us who we are born in sin, we inherited sin because we were born in sin, we inherited from our forefathers right up to Adam. But even though Jesus came in the lineage of Adam, but we see he did not descend from Adam the same way as we human beings did. And he inherited no sin in him. It was because of the miraculous power of the Holy Spirit that prevented the transfer of sin from Mary to Jesus. And we looked at his human weaknesses and limitations. We saw that he was, Jesus was tight.  He faced temptation, but even though he was human, just like us in every way, but he was sinless and he remained sinless. He did not commit any sin. Even though he was tempted, you know, he overcame temptation. Of course, there is only one recorded temptation in Matthew chapter four, but I'm sure Jesus would have, you know, gone through various other temptations and, you know, he's a faithful high priest who's able to, you know, help us in our time of weakness, in our time of when we go through temptation. It's because he became one like us. He lived, you know, in our human body. He knows our human frailties and difficulties. He knows our human limitations as well, and he's able to help us. He's able to strengthen us. He's able to help us overcome our weaknesses and our frailties and our temptations and he understands. So we saw some of the, his human weaknesses and limitations that he was, you know, born just like any one of us as a baby. He grew up to be a child, went through a childhood and then to adulthood. He became tired just like any of us do. We see, we, you know, when they traveled and they were going on their way and they stopped at Jacob's well and it says in John chapter four was six that Jesus was tired from his journey. And this was just, and he sat near that Jacob's well. It was just before he met the Samaritan woman. We also read in the gospels that Jesus was hungry. Mark chapter 11 verses 12 to 19 when Jesus was leaving Bethany, you know, Jesus was hungry and he saw a fig tree in the distance. It had leaf on it, but when he went close, you know, anticipating that there would be fruits on it. There was no fruit. We know what he did. He cursed the fig tree. Okay. And after he fasted for 40 days and 40 nights, it says that he was hungry. We read this in Matthew chapter four verse two. We also see that he faced that like any of us would face that he died on the cross. His human body ceased to have life in it and cease to function. We read about this in Matthew chapter 27 was 50 where Jesus, it says that Jesus cried out loudly and then he died. Okay. And in Luke 24 39, we also see that, you know, we read that Jesus when he rose again, he had the physical body, you know, but it was not the same old physical body that was raised in human weakness and friendlies that he had when he died. Just like, you know, Lazarus or Jerry's daughter had when when Jesus, you know, rose them from the dead. But when Jesus rose from the dead, he is he had he no longer had the natural body, but he had the spiritual body had the glorified body, the incorruptible body. It was not the same like he had before he died, one with weaknesses and friendlies. And so we know that he is no longer subject to weaknesses and disease or death. And that is why we read that he is the first fruits of those who risen from the dead. And so the first fruit means there's more to other fruits to follow. And we are, you know, benefited by Jesus's resurrection in that that when we are raised again back to life, we will be raised with the imperishable incorruptible bodies, bodies that are no longer weak, but glorified bodies. Okay. And so we see that he was no longer subject to weaknesses, diseases or death. And he had he was not a ghost or he when he appeared to his disciples during the 40 day period before his ascension back to heaven. We see that he had a human body had hands and feet. And that's what he tells, you know, his disciples, when they do not believe that it is truly Jesus, it was since they thought it was his ghost, he said, touch my hand, my feet, my side. And in Luke chapter 24 verse 39, we read, he says, look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself touch me and see. And then he says, a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you see I have. So Jesus, when he resurrected, he resurrected with, you know, the physical body, but it was a glorified spiritual body that he had. And he chose to have the scars on himself. You know, so that maybe for the reason that his disciples would know that it's truly him. But when we are raised in our glorified spiritual bodies, we will bear no scars. Okay, we also see as a human that Jesus had a human mind, he increased in wisdom. Luke chapter two was 52, mentions for us that he increased in wisdom and stature. Can one of you please read Luke chapter two verse 52, please? Luke chapter two verse 52, one of you can read that. Luke chapter two verse 52, and Jesus increased in wisdom and stature and in favor with God and man. Thank you. So we see that he increased in wisdom and stature with God and man. We also see that Jesus had a human emotion just like any one of us. He says, my soul is troubled. John chapter 12 verse 27. We also see, if you read the Gospels, we come across this word compassion very often. You know, wherever we see Jesus ministering, we see that Jesus was moved with compassion when he saw the sick, when he saw the suffering, when he, you know, when people, the crowd just came to him, he was moved with the compassion and we read one instance is Matthew chapter nine was 36. Can one of you please read Matthew chapter nine was 36, please? But when he saw the multitudes, he was moved with compassion for them because they were weary and scattered like sheep having no shepherd. Thank you. So we see that he was moved with compassion when he saw that the people were harassed when he saw that they were helpless, like sheep without a shepherd. Okay. We also know that Jesus was, you know, had the emotion of joy and John chapter 15 verse 11. He tells them that, you know, I have told you this so that my joy may be in you and that your joy may be complete. Okay. We also know that Jesus had, was angry. He had the emotion of anger. He showed his anger times. Mark chapter three was five. Can one of you please read that? Mark chapter three was five, please? Anyone can read Mark chapter three was five. And when he had looked around them, looked around at them with anger, being grieved by the hardness of their hearts, he said to the man, stretch out your hand. Thank you. So here it was this man, the shrivel hand and, you know, it was a sabbath day and, you know, the Farsi Sadducees were waiting to see if Jesus would heal a man on the sabbath so that they could find a fault in him. They could catch him. And Jesus, knowing their thoughts, knowing their intentions, he was deeply, you know, distressed at their attitude, at their mindset that they did not want this man to be healed. There was so much more legalistic wanting to follow the laws, which they could not really keep as it is. But here they did not want this man to be healed. And that is why Jesus was angry. And we see that whenever Jesus was angry, it was not like a human anger. And then we could, if he was angry, like we get angry in retaliation or in bitterness or, you know, in hatred, in frustration, it was, then we would, you know, we would, we can say that Jesus sinned, but his anger was, was a righteous anger. It was a redemptive anger. And we see that even when he cleansed the temple, it was because they were making his father's house as a marketplace. And all the more because they were selling the animals in the Gentile Court. It was the only place that the Gentiles could come and worship God.  And also that, you know, they were selling those animals at an increased rate compared to the market rate. And so all of this really kind of frustrated God Jesus angry. It was a righteous anger because they were cheating. They were using the Gentile Court to, which was a place of worship for the Gentiles. They did not even consider the Gentiles as worthy to worship God, using that court to sell animals. And it was not the place to make business in the house of God. So we see it was a righteous anger, more redemptive anger. Here also, you know, we see that his anger was righteous and redemptive.  We also see that Jesus was sorrowful. Any idea where we, where you read or where in the Gospels it's mentioned that Jesus was filled with sorrow? At the tomb of Lazarus? Yes, at the tomb of Lazarus. Thank you, John, where he wept when he saw Mary and Martha and all the people weeping. He was filled with sorrow, Jesus wept. Anywhere else where Jesus was filled with sorrow? The Garden of Gethsemane, Matthew chapter 26 verse 37 and 38. Can one of you please read that please? Matthew 26, 37 and 38. Silatoli, can you please read Matthew 26, 37 and 38? Then Jesus came with them to a place called Gethsemane and said to the disciple, Sit here while I go and pray over there. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Sebedee and he began to be sorrowful and deeply distraught. Thank you. So here we see that Jesus was sorrowful and troubled. Why do you think Jesus was sorrowful and troubled in the Garden of Gethsemane? This is just before he was going to be arrested and then being crucified. So why was Jesus sorrowful? Why do you think Jesus was sorrowful?  Or was it because he was going to be forsaken by his father? Or was it because his disciples were going to abandon him? I think because the disciples did not keep awake and pray because I asked them to pray and they did not keep watch to pray. Thank you Isaac. Isaac says because his disciples did not watch and pray along with him. Anyone else? John you are going to say something or Silatoli go ahead. According to my understanding he is also just like us. He used to feel pain and also he can see what's going to happen in the future. And you know at the time like who knows just my gaze like in his thought he might be thinking my father is going forsake him something like that. Thank you Silatoli. Anyone else? While reading the scriptures that we just read Matthew chapter 26 we read as the part of as Isaac mentioned remember disciples were supposed to watch and pray with him and this is the specific word which we see then and he said to them my soul is exceedingly sorrowful even to death. So it's a natural I think it's a human emotion that came up that time just because Jesus was human that was the reason he was sorrowful. Thank you good inputs just my thoughts on it is you know he was in his prayer was struggling to you know complete or do the will of the father and finally he says father not my will be done but yours be done and to my understanding it's because he was going to you know be taking on the sins of the entire human race and for someone who is God he was not just fully human but he was also fully God he was deity as well humanity and deity co-existed in the person of Jesus Christ and he was sinless and for him to take on the sins of the entire world which is so detestable in God's sight God cannot stand sin. The minute Adam and Eve sin for us it could just look at something that was so small just eating of fruit that God told them not to eat from the tree it was it can look very small to us you know the sin of disobedience compared to the great you know other sins that we can think as a greater in magnitude but you know for God sin is sin whether it's small whether it's big and for Jesus was struggling in this area to you know to take on the sins of the entire mankind it was like that the day of atonement when the sins of the entire Israelite people or nation would be placed on the scapegoat or would be placed on that goat that was lamb that was to be sacrificed and Jesus was going to be taking on the sins of the entire human race and you know that was the struggle it was not I know it was not maybe death it was not even being forsaken by the father because he knows he's you know he will be going back to the father but of course he cries out on the cross father father why have you forsaken me it could also be the reason but here this main struggle in my understanding is that you know he had to do the will of the father and he says father not finally when he prays the third time just before he was arrested not my will be not my will but let your will be done so it was not that he did not want to die for us or you know or complete doing the will of the father but it was just the whole you know thing of taking on the sins of the entire human race but he took it on himself he who knew no sin became sin for us so that we can have become the righteousness of God so that we can have the life of God and that is you know the great God we serve the loving God we serve you know the merciful and compassionate God we serve not only somebody who identifies with us who became human to identify with us who knows what we are going through but also somebody you know who took upon himself our sins our pain our sicknesses our deaths that we can have life and so you know we need to rejoice and celebrate that and also live in the fullness and live in what Christ has purchased for us on the cross okay we also see that he was tempted as we are but we know that even though he was tempted just as we are at all points it says at all points yet without sin and I think his Hebrews chapter 4 was 15 you know Jesus was tempted in all points so sometimes you might think you know I've fallen into this temptation but Jesus does not know what I'm going through because he was just tempted with food and power and authority and position and you know just worshiping Satan but you know I'm facing even more difficult temptation than what Jesus did and so he really does not know but it says here you know in Hebrews that if it's written there at all points you know it was we know that the Word of God is the inspired Word of God and inspired by the Holy Spirit and so at all points means he went through every temptation so like I said in the beginning of the class you know many things are not recorded for us in the Gospels but Jesus would have been tempted in various other areas as well I'm sure Satan would not have left him but it says if he was tempted at all points just as we are yet without sin so when we go through temptation when we are faced with temptation Jesus knows what we are going through and he's able and is going will help us overcome temptation okay so the fact that he faced temptation shows that he had a genuine human nature that could be tempted it also shows that even when Jesus was tempted we too can be tempted it also shows us that when Jesus overcame temptation live sinless we too can overcome temptation and like this whole idea of why the incarnation is because Jesus is our role model we can always keep looking at him and saying when Jesus did that you know I can also do it you know I also have the Holy Spirit I also have Jesus to help me to strengthen me so whatever area you are facing temptation or struggles or weaknesses you know you can also come to this place where you're saying when Jesus as a human did not give in or overcame it I too can overcome it with the power of the Holy Spirit and Jesus is there to help me and strengthen me just like you know Jesus I have a friend who says you know Jesus was without he was never sick so we can never be sick well that is a high level of faith that the person has Jesus was naturally supernatural so I need to also be naturally supernatural so if there's any sickness in my body I just refuse it you know Jesus did not have sicknesses and you know I too shouldn't have so that's the level of faith that person has it's good to have that level of faith and have that kind of understanding and walk in it in every area of our life we also see that a third area of his humanity was that he was sinless though New Testament clearly teaches us that Jesus is fully human just as we are it also affirms that Jesus was without sin he never committed sin in his lifetime can one of you please read first Peter chapter 2 verse 22 please sorry first Peter chapter 2 verse 22 who committed no sin nor was deceit found in his mouth thank you so we see that you know Jesus committed no sin and there was no deceit in his mouth okay now why was Jesus full humanity uh in necessary we studied about this in Christology any one of you would like to share your thoughts or what you remember why was Jesus is full humanity necessary to become like us to show that we can also live a life a victorious Christian life okay uh to model for us fine uh it's the perfect role model what else like bill johnson says Jesus Christ is the perfect theology so anything you want to know is the truth look back at Jesus's life he's the perfect theology bill john possible johnson's quote yes so why was it necessary for Jesus to be fully human when we studied about this in Christology look at the most spiritual aspects what was the one main we have a lot of other reasons but what is the main reason why God had to become man so that he can go through the temptations okay thank you jeffina said he could go through the temptations why did God have to become man what was that one main reason because men sin and that's one of i guess that's one of the reason and also uh many the savior thank you zealot holy yes uh what is the the entire main truth or the central truth of the entire scripture is uh sin salvation uh sin redemption uh unrighteousness uh you know unrighteous being made righteous um you know falling short of god standard being raised up to god standard so we see that in from genesis a very beginning how Jesus unfolded the whole plan of salvation not only from genesis but you know even before the foundation of the world the lamb that was slain uh was was already slain before the foundation of the world i think is we read this in revelation chapter three if i'm not wrong you know so the plan of salvation was already completed done thing in the mind of god but it happened at one point of his in one time at point in history um you know uh when god wanted it to be done in the right time the right season uh the chai ros moment uh so we see that happening in history but it it happened even before uh the foundations of the earth so uh like isaac was uh like asked the question you know why is uh jesus constantly being referred to the lamb of god or why is this lamb of god being continually mentioned is because the central truth or the line of thought or the thread that flows through from genesis one right up to the last chapter in revelation uh is uh about uh sin and uh salvation is about how man uh fell short of the standard of god uh you know and the wrath of god had to be appeased and so the sacrifice had to be uh made so that is something that is a central through the main truth of the entire uh scripture so we see that um we could not save ourselves we are sinless uh we could not save ourselves and um uh you know god loves us so much that he did not want us to perish uh and so he unfolded the plan of salvation and for that uh uh plan of salvation uh uh you know somebody had to make the price or appease god with the sacrifice make the atonement the propitiation make the propitiation for our sins where the wrath of god um you know would be um uh would be appeased would be made the suitable acceptable sacrifice could be made and um thereby god's wrath would be turned into his favor and so we see that only a sinless person uh can make this sacrifice and so it was god is the only spirit being uh you know who is uh sinless and so he became man took on the form of a human body and made uh the uh sacrifice he was a substitute sacrifice so why was jesus's full humanity necessary uh the first thing uh we uh we could say is that uh we read in roman's chapter five was 19 uh can one of you please read roman's chapter five was 19 please roman's five 19 or as by once one man's disobedience many were met seniors so also by one man's obedience many will be made righteous thank you so jesus had to be become a human uh to be our representative and obey in our place so through his obedience uh you know uh we are made righteous through man's disobedience we were made sinners but through uh through um another man's obedience that is uh jesus who is referred to as the last adam uh we are made righteous uh the second thing uh is that why was jesus's full humanity necessary was so that he could be uh you know uh uh the substitute sacrifice he could be that lamb who made the full sufficient perfect sacrifice um hebrew's chapter two was 16 and 17 can one of you please read that hebrew's chapter two was 16 and 17 for indeed he does not give eight to angels but he does give eight to the seed of Abraham therefore in all things he had to be made like his brethren that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to god to make propitiation for the sins of the people thank you so here we see that um you know um he became uh like us in every manner every respect so that he could be that merciful and faithful high priest who'd make uh the propitiation uh in some translations is the expiation but the appropriate or more accurate word is the propitiation for the sins of the people propitiation is the sacrifice uh he made the sacrifice uh that uh that bore the wrath of god against sin and thereby uh you know because he made the full sufficient perfect sacrifice he turns god's wrath into his uh into god's favor for us so we see that um um he had to okay if you look at um uh this verse it says therefore he had to be made like his brethren so the brethren so there's no other way but he had to be made like us in every way so that he might become the propitiation for us the sacrifice that is the acceptable substitute in our place or the uh acceptable substitute for us so uh it's important here to realize that unless christ was fully man he could never have died to pay the penalty for man's sin and he could uh you know he could not have been the substitute sacrifice for us so that's the second thing where he became the substitute sacrifice the third thing is he became the mediator between god and us um uh and he's the only person who fulfilled the requirement uh and jesus christ was the only one who fulfilled the requirement of being the mediator between um god and us why did he have to be the mediator between god and us any idea was there is only one mediator and the one who can sympathize with us is god himself thank you there's only one mediator and the one who can sympathize with us is god who became flesh who understands us okay we were all alienated from god by our sin we needed someone to come between god and ourselves and reconcile us back to god make us friends back with god because we were enemies with god we needed a mediator who could represent us uh who could understand us and know us mediators always uh you know somebody who's gone through the struggles somebody who knows what we are going through somebody who understands and who can better uh you know stand on behalf of us and so he became that perfect mediator because he became one like us he could understand us and hence he could represent us to god and um uh you know uh and and somebody who could represent god also to us so in both ways he was a mediator he could represent god to us and we uh we could understand or know who god is know his heart know his nature uh know his ways uh when we when we saw jesus living here on this earth and also he's the perfect representative for us uh before god in heaven okay and we know that he is the only one who could fulfill that uh requirement um and first Timothy chapter two was five says there is one god and there is one mediator between god and men the man christ jesus okay so in order to fulfill this role as a mediator jesus became fully man uh as well as he was fully uh god and like we already said that you know uh he was an example he became an example so that uh we could follow um and for us for him to be an example to us he had to become fully human uh just like us okay uh we look at uh the deity of christ of course uh on wednesday when we began looking at this chapter uh the doctrine of christ and of the holy spirit uh we kind of recapped what we studied about the deity and the humanity of christ in christology so we'll just very briefly look at the deity of christ here uh the whole of the new testament have a lot has a lot of proof about the deity of christ um so we'll just look at a couple of things we've already studied quite a lot of them in a number of points in christology but we'll just take a few names of god and we'll look at his uh that he is a deity that he was fully man jesus christ was fully man and fully god um so the first uh you know uh name of god we will look at is the word theos uh anyone knows we studied about the names of god in um in uh doctrine foundation systematic theology in our previous classes anyone remembers what is the meaning of theos god thank you um it's god um um we read that in john chapter one was one in the beginning was a low cause and the low cause was with theos okay theos god um so it's usually referred in the new testament for god the father okay this word theos uh so what is the word for theos in the old testament theos is the name for god in the new testament uh where it refers to god the father but we'll also look at places where this word theos is also referring to uh jesus christ the same name that is ascribed to god the father the old testament also ascribed to god the son uh so what is the equivalent name of theos in uh or what is how is god called in the old testament alohim okay uh i said of course yaway they would not uh speak the name but alohim uh is is the term used for god only for god and not for anyone else uh the equivalent word for alohim that's in the old testament uh the new testament is theos uh and it's referred to god the father but also in several places uh like in john chapter one was one uh john chapter 20 was 28 roman's chapter nine was five titus chapter two was 13 and hebrew's chapter one was eight it uh the same term theos which is used to refer to god the father is also used to refer to uh god the son that is uh jesus christ okay so would uh some of one of you please read um uh john chapter one was 18 john chapter 20 was 28 someone else can read and roman's chapter nine was five please john 118 no one has seen god at any time the only regarding son who is in the bosom of the father has declared him thank you so no one has ever seen god um so that is no one has ever seen theos and the one and only son who is himself theos okay so uh here the first theos is talking about god the father the second theos is talking about god the son okay uh john chapter 20 was 28 and thomas answered and said to him my lord and my god thank you so here uh you know when thomas uh realizes that it is jesus uh he says my lord and my god the word theos there okay uh someone else can read roman's nine five please roman's chapter nine was five of whom are the fathers and from whom according to the flesh christ came who is over all the eternally blessed god amen thank you so there's other patriarchs from there's trace the human ancestry of the messiah who is god overall whose theos overall uh forever uh praise so whenever we read in the greek lexic in the greek bible you know uh the septigent whenever they used to read uh this word theos they knew that it's referring to uh uh god the father but uh when it is ascribed to the son it also shows that uh jesus is uh uh god okay uh the second name for god is kyrgios or kurios we already studied about uh this term kurios anyone remembers what's the meaning of kurios or kyrgios anyone remembers we had learned learned it as kurios kurios is the greek form of uh the term of god adonai okay adonai means lord or sovereign uh it's it's a term that is used to call uh people uh human beings who are masters or owners or the people in places of authority it's also a term that is used for god a title that used for god so it's a title used both for men and for god uh so in the old testament it's adonai so places where you read adonai it can also be a title referred to men and also to god himself but elohem theos is yawai is exclusively just used for god and kurios is the greek form of uh uh the hebrew term uh adonai okay or uh it's also we can also say it as kyrgios okay and we see that this term is used for jesus christ as well um so if we look at uh the septuagint uh the septuagint is basically the greek translation of the old testament uh or we see that um uh this word kyrgios or kurios that is used for uh god the father or uh you know is used for christ as well and um it's also uh from uh you know this word um we also get the hebrew word yawai okay so there are many instances in the new testament where this word is used for christ so whenever there is a greek speaking people when they used to read the septuagint and they had an idea of the old testament wherever they used to read this word kurios kyrgios they knew it was uh the word used for yawai so it had a very strong sense a strong word a strong meaning for them um uh because they knew that this uh you know uh this is what was the meaning for in the old testament so we see that um uh this word yawai or you know when it's translated yawai or the word kurios which uh also means yawai uh is also referred in the new testament uh and so we see that uh you know it proves that jesus is deity that he is um god okay so we look at the verses where we find this term kurios uh uh referred to jesus christ in the new testament uh next class on wednesday we'll stop here um we just have two more minutes so just a few things uh i hope all of you have received your uh grades for your christology test yes no yes anyone has to still receive it yes i've received it okay uh i'm sure some of you are disappointed with the grades i was quite uh myself but it's just the first test it assessment um you'll have two more to go uh so wherever you have missed out um uh you know or if you've not written the right answer or you've missed out a few points i have added the points in the uh uh in the section there and i've emailed it to you so um in the feedback box i have put my put the answer the right answer so please take time to read the right answer uh uh you know uh many of you have lost marks in the first uh the long question i said you know uh it's important to use theological terms uh we need to you need to come to that understanding that you're our theological students and you just can't answer like a lay person does uh you know if a lay person answered uh gave the answers you had given then they would have got good marks but it's important as theological students to uh you know to make sure that you are giving the uh theological proofs that are necessary or adequate uh to um uh you know reason with some an unbeliever to prove that Jesus is deity okay uh so that is why some of you lost points and some of the points that you missed out i have put it in the in the in the uh feedback box those of you who got full answers uh full marks for the answers i have not put in the right answers because you have already um you know uh mentioned everything that is necessary i think most of you lost points in you did not mention that you know the essence Jesus has same essence of the same uh nature the characteristic the attributes as God himself he was in the bosom of the father he was very intimate with the father and the holy spirit and you missed talking about the zoe life the life that God has in him uh self the eternal existent self-existent self-sufficient life also you missed out on at the i am uh the the right meaning of it mighty God is the um is the omnipotent one which some of you had missed out on that as well uh if you have looked at your answers which i have sent then you still feel you you know you know need more marks then please feel free to uh write to me um and i will recheck but i have taken uh time to look at each of your answers i've been a little gracious in giving you marks i've not cut marks for those of you who sent in your assignment assessment in late okay today is your doctoral foundation uh assessment i will post it by five thirty this evening uh or even before that uh the due date is monday which is uh monday is the uh seventh uh march and please send it in by five uh p.m i s t okay uh so all the best for your uh doctoral foundation test and have a good day and a good weekend and i will see you on monday anyone has any doubts with questions anything you'll like to share no okay thank you everyone uh it's already late for your next class uh thank you for joining class today have a blessed day and a blessed weekend bye


It's now time for Question Period, the leader of the Madison's Royal Opposition. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Premier. Premiered by 2017-2018, the government expects to squander over 10 cents of every revenue dollar collected by Queen's Park towards servicing your Liberal government's reckless and unaffordable debt. That's taxpayers' money that should be reinvested in frontline health care, first-rate education, reliable roads and transit. Instead of showing leadership and taking decisive action, you're going to force hard-working Ontarians to pay more for a decade of Liberal mismanagement. So Premier, what taxes will you raise on Ontario's families in order to service that debt and balance the books? Thank you, Premier. Well, Mr. Speaker, let me just say that we've been very clear about the path to balance that we have laid out. We understand that it's extremely important that we continue to constrain increases on wages, Mr. Speaker. We understand and we laid out clearly that we were going to be looking at the assets that are owned by the people of Ontario and making sure that they are working to the best advantage of the people of Ontario, and that's the work that Ed Clark and his commission are doing, Mr. Speaker. But we also recognize that as the economic recovery takes hold, Mr. Speaker, it's extremely important that we make the investments that are necessary so that we can continue to create jobs and work with municipalities to make sure that communities grow, because the economic well-being of communities across this province are part of the economic well-being of the province. So we have laid that all out in our budget, then in our platform, and then in our budget again, and that's the plan we're implementing, Mr. Speaker. Well, Mr. Speaker, in fact, Premier, Premier, because of your inability to stop spending a reverse course, Ontario has half a billion dollars shortfall this year alone. Ontarians cannot afford any more money taken out of their pockets. They cannot afford new and higher taxes. On the issue of a carbon tax, your environment minister has said, quote, it's time for all of us to start to get comfortable with two words, carbon tax, without it all those dreams of a green tomorrow are hallucinations. End of quote. So, Premier, straightforward question. Will you be introducing a carbon tax on hardworking Ontario families before 2018? Yes or no? Tax. Well, Mr. Speaker, what we are focused on is making sure that we do everything in our power to grow the economy, Mr. Speaker. We understand that balancing the books and making sure that the deficit is reduced by 2017-18 is very much a part of the task in front of us. But we also know that building on the success of creating over 500,000 net new jobs since the recession, Mr. Speaker. The lowest unemployment rate since the recession at 6.5 percent, Mr. Speaker. We recognize that building on those successes is what we have to do if we are going to be successful over the next decade. And the investments that we're talking about that will ease people's commutes, that will make sure that communities have the roads and bridges that they need, the hospitals and the schools, those contribute to a quality of life that is critical to the economic and the social well-being of the people in this province, Mr. Speaker. Final second. Thank you. Well, Mr. Speaker, it sounds like a yes to me. I think so. Premier Laurel Broughton, sorry, a former Ontario Liberal Environment Minister and Cabinet colleague of yours is calling on the Nova Scotia government to introduce a carbon tax. Quebec implemented a carbon tax in 2007 and then became part of the Western Climate Initiative. In August 2014, you announced a strengthened relationship with Quebec on the issue of climate change. And your news release even quoted Premier Koulard as saying, we're looking forward to recruiting new partners among our neighbors. Well, to be a partner, you have to have a carbon tax. So Premier, do you plan on joining Quebec and imposing a carbon tax on Ontario families? Thank you. Mr. Speaker, here's what we're joining with Quebec on. And that is an acknowledgement that reducing greenhouse gas emissions and dealing with the effects of climate change is a challenge for every single one of us. And the member opposite is the first to jump up, Mr. Speaker, if there is a tornado or if there is a flood or if there is a demonstration indication of the impact of climate change. So on this side of the House, Mr. Speaker, we believe that climate change is a reality that we have to deal with. A member from Renfrew will come to order. The most important thing that has been done in this country in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions is the shutdown of coal-fired plants and in the future, Mr. Speaker. New question, the leader of the opposition. Well, you know, Mr. Speaker, we can play the shell game all we want.  Premier, during the last election, you called cuts to education dangerous for children. In fact, you said cuts to education funding were detrimental and have such a negative impact on so many people's lives in this province that you would never support them. And yet you're now planning to cut $500 million from the education budget because of your fiscal mismanagement. You claimed these cuts were dangerous during the election, yet now your government is taking millions of dollars out of the classroom. So Premier, this is just another case of you saying one thing and then doing another. Mr. Speaker, the fact is that our government has increased funding to the education system every single year we've been in office, Mr. Speaker, and we're continuing to do that. We've increased education funding to $22 billion this year, Mr. Speaker. That's an increase of 56.5% since 2003 and an increase of more than $4,000 per student. The fact is, Mr. Speaker, that we have made sure that the resources that go into education, go into advanced student achievement, Mr. Speaker, we came into office and 68% of kids were graduating from high school in this province. 83% of kids are graduating from high school in Ontario now, Mr. Speaker. The reality is that at a time of declining enrollment, we have continued to increase funding to the education system because we know that that's how the talent and skills of our kids can thrive, Mr. Speaker. Supplementary. Yeah, to the Premier, Mr. Speaker. Premier, your former Liberal colleague and successor is Education Minister Leona Dombrovsky said that, quote, the government believes locally elected school boards have sound processes in place to make decisions about school closures and consultation with their communities. And you've said similar things many times. Yet yesterday, your current Education Minister made it pretty clear in this House that you will not fund under-capacity schools, leaving the impression that the Minister will make the decision on what schools will close. So Premier, which is it? Will individual school boards decide which schools will close, if any? Or will you order the school closings yourself? Excellent. In fact, what I heard the Minister of Education say was that we have to make sure that we fund the students and the places in the schools, the students that exist, Mr. Speaker, that we make sure that we work with school boards to maximize the investments in their school boards to make sure that the programs that are available to kids are the ones that they absolutely need. I fully support, I've been a school trustee, Mr. Speaker, I fully support the authority of school boards to make decisions about program delivery to students, Mr. Speaker, but it is only responsible that we work as a provincial government with school boards, something I might say the member opposite doesn't know a lot about given their track record in government, but that we work with school boards to make sure that the distribution of kids in schools in the best way possible and that we're not funding empty or half-empty schools, Mr. Speaker. Final supplementary. Mr. Speaker, I don't need any lectures after 24 and a half years in this house, serving school boards, teaching for good education and supporting good education. Premier, as Education Minister, you said, quote, it would in fact be irresponsible. Stop and talk please. Order. Please finish. As Education Minister said, it would in fact be irresponsible for any government to tie the hands of local school boards to make decisions about their communities. However, by slashing half a billion dollars from the education budget, you're doing exactly that. Minister, as the environment comes to order. Particularly in rural and small town Ontario, a done deal. Premier, very simply, when will you release the list of the schools you're planning to close? Mr. Speaker, let me repeat. We are increasing funding to the education system. In the face of declining enrollment, we are increasing the funding to school boards. That's the fact. That is the reality. That is the reality that school boards are dealing with. Will we continue to work with school boards to make sure that kids are getting the programs that they need, that there are enough kids in schools to make them viable? Absolutely. We will continue to work with school boards. Will we work with school boards to help them to consolidate where there's an opportunity for school boards to work together? Absolutely. We will do that. I think that that is responsible management of the public dollars in this province. Will we continue to work with school boards to improve student achievement as we have done, Mr. Speaker, and we have seen student achievement increase? Absolutely. We will do that. Will we fund empty spaces? And will we step back from the process? No. We will continue to work with school boards, Mr. Speaker. New question. The leader of the third party. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Premier. Yesterday the Premier said, I quote, the reality is that we continue to put more money into education. But an internal document says that under the Liberal austerity plan, quote, the recent pattern of annual increases in education funding is no longer sustainable, I quote. Now internally, the Liberals say that half a billion dollars is going to be slashed from schools. In public, the Premier is playing good cop, telling Ontarians that they are going to be putting more into education. And in private, she's being bad cop and saying that the well is dry, Speaker. Why is the Premier telling one story in public and another story behind closed doors? So, Mr. Speaker, and I know the Minister of Education is going to want to weigh in on this, but let me repeat what I have said. We continue to put more money into education, Mr. Speaker. Even in the face of declining enrollment, that is what we have been doing. But, Mr. Speaker, you know the reality is that there are ways of school boards working together. And I'll use transportation as the example that is the farthest along, Mr. Speaker. The reality is that we have worked over a number of years, in fact, since I was Minister of Transportation, to make sure that school boards have the capacity to work together and that they have the ability to have kids from different boards and different schools on the same school bus, Mr. Speaker, so that school buses driving down a particular road pick up kids and take them to a number of schools. That kind of cooperation, whether it's transportation or whether it's back office, whether it's sharing buildings, yeah, Mr. Speaker, we're going to continue to try to work to find those efficiencies. Thank you. Supplementary. Mr. Speaker, despite the Premier's denials, internal documents say clearly she's slashing $500 million from schools. Now, as a former Minister of Education and school board trustee, the Premier knows that it's always the most vulnerable students who suffer the most from this, whether it's school closures or cuts to special needs, ESL, school breakfast programs, library and literacy, enumery supports, or counseling services, Speaker. The bottom line is it's going to hurt students. Will the Premier commit to putting that half a billion dollars back into our schools where it belongs, Speaker? Mr. Speaker, you know, teachers, I mean, on so many issues it is so dangerous to oversimplify and to take a particular notion and make, extrapolate that across a whole issue. The fact is that there are instances after, there are many, many instances across the province where school boards have made decisions about consolidating schools and the programs have improved. Those very students that the leader of the third party is talking about get better service, Mr. Speaker. They get better opportunities. They have more opportunities because of the consolidation of the school board or because the building of a new building, Mr. Speaker. And more times than not, when there's a consolidation of schools, there is a renovation or a new school built. So to oversimplify this issue, Mr. Speaker, and to somehow suggest that the fact that we're putting more money in education is a problem I think is irresponsible. Mr. Speaker, there's nothing simple about it. Slashing half a billion dollars from education is going to mean ripping schools out of some communities and overcrowding others. It's going to mean program cut, Mr. Speaker. It's going to hurt the most vulnerable students in our schools and this Premier knows that that's true, Mr. Speaker. The Premier created chaos in our school system with Bill 115 and she's creating chaos again with a half a billion dollar cut, Speaker, to schools. If she's not prepared to put the money back into our schools, will she stand up and tell parents and educators exactly what it is that she's going to be cutting from them? Mr. Speaker, Minister of Education. Minister of Education. I think I'd like to start by talking a little bit about the funding model because classrooms are funded as you well know, Speaker, based on the number of students. So looking at boards and working with boards on can they operate the space more efficiently? Has nothing to do with the number of teachers or the amount of special ed money? That's all based on the number of students and it has absolutely nothing to do with this issue. But what we do believe is that it's perfectly reasonable to work with trustees and say to them, in terms of your operations which is heating, lighting, and space, we can work together to make it more efficient. That's all we're saying is good management no matter who you are involves good management. Thank you. New question. Thank you, Speaker. My next question is for the Premier. In health care, just as in education, before the election, we promised that things would get better. After the election, we see things are getting very much worse, Speaker. Today, Health Quality Ontario released its annual report and they say, quote, access to care continues to be a problem in many areas of our health system, unquote. When Ontario is compared to 10 countries, Speaker, including Great Britain and the United States, we come dead last, dead last when it comes to getting people in to see a doctor when they're sick. Yes, we even do worse than the U.S., Speaker. Does the Premier think it's okay that Ontarians wait longer to see a doctor than patients in 10 other countries, Speaker? Thank you. Well, Mr. Speaker, the fact is we know that there is more that we can do. When we have been working to transform the health care system, Mr. Speaker, there are a number of areas where wait times have been reduced, Mr. Speaker, and we have made a lot of progress, but we also know that we're dealing with an aging population that needs a different kind of service that needs more service at home, and that's the transformation that we are in the mid-stuff. We're not proposing that we are finished with the transformation of the health care system. We know that there's more that has to be done and part of that is getting right services to people where they need them, whether that is whether that is in a hospital or whether that is at home or whether that is in some other kind of supportive housing. So this is an issue that is ongoing, Mr. Speaker. We know that there's more to be done and we are investing in those changes in order to get to those successes. Well, Speaker, during the election the Premier said, quote, Ontario will be the healthiest place in North America to grow up but the election's over. The Health Quality Report says that long-term care wait times for residents in hospitals have never been higher, Speaker. They're higher today than at any other point since the Liberals came to office, tripling from just 18 days in 2004 to a staggering 65 days. Under this Liberal Government, seniors are waiting longer than ever in hospital for the long-term care that they need. Now, how healthy does the Premier think it is to have seniors waiting over two months for long-term care that they need? Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. We welcome the release of Health Quality Ontario's report that's called Measuring Out, Mr. Speaker. We're committed to providing the best patient care possible and we have adopted a process of transformation that has provided different kinds of service and has allowed people to get service at home in the community where they haven't been able to get it before. Are we finished? Absolutely not. But there are many areas in the report that show the successes that we have achieved, Mr. Speaker.  So the fact is, Mr. Speaker, that the work that we are doing is actually providing services that people need is providing them with the services that they've been looking for and providing them in their homes and in the community where they weren't able to get them before, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Final supplementary. Mr. Speaker, during the campaign the Premier promised she'd hire nurses, not fire them. In fact, she said, quote, I'm not going to apologize for hiring nurses. But after the campaign the truth comes out, Speaker. Every year for the last five years we've had fewer registered nurses looking after our kids, our parents and our loved ones. Ontario's Nurses Association President Linda Haslam Slash Stroud uses words like and I quote, appalled. Stop the clock, please. Order, please. It's better. Thank you. Finish, please. President Linda Haslam Stroud and I quote, appalled, disgusted and horrified to describe what's going on in parts of this province under this Liberal Government. Registered nurse positions are being eliminated all over Ontario, creating an appalling situation in this province. So, I ask this Premier, will she apologize for that? Okay. Well, Mr. Speaker, let's talk about the facts. The fact is that we have hired over 20,000 nurses, Mr. Speaker. Let's talk about the fact that we've established 26 nurse practitioner-led clinics. Let's talk about the fact that we've got now 10 Aboriginal community health centres, 76 community health centres, 200 family health teams, Mr. Speaker. We have diversified the ways in which people can access primary health care. We have hired more professionals and we have put them into interdisciplinary teams, Mr. Speaker delivering health care in a way that makes sense to people in communities across the province. That's why the health quality Ontario report is able to say that Ontarians are healthier than ever. We will continue to make investments and continue to transform the health care system so that it meets the needs of the people of this province. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is repeated warnings about the structural problems that the government faced. On January 11th, 2012 an inspector from the Ministry of Labor performed an inspection of the mall that to quote Justice Bernalje was perfunctory, incurious and inadequate. Premier, you've not apologised on behalf of your government for playing a part in the mall's collapse. An apology can go a long way. It can help speed up the healing process after a tragedy. Premier, will you apologise Premier? Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I know the Minister of Labor is going to want to speak to the specifics. I just want to say that we have said all along that my hearts go out to the community members particularly to the family of the woman who died in the collapse of the mall. I'm very grateful the two people who died. I am very pleased that the report has exposed the issues that needed to have been dealt with. I will let the Minister of Labor speak to the specifics. Thank you. I think it would mean a great deal more if you actually went to Elliott Lake and did that formal apology as you did with the other examples that we have. In 2009, your government passed a law that allows a person to apologise on a specific issue. The Attorney General at the time said this bill gives people the opportunity to have closure to speak frankly in relation to an issue whether it's a health care issue or a legal issue or some other matter without having those comments that they are making used against them in a court of law. You have an opportunity to show real leadership and apologise to the people of Elliott Lake for your lack of oversight. I would like you to apologise to the people of Elliott Lake. Minister of Labor. Thank you, Speaker. I think I can speak for all members of the House that we were all saddened when we heard the news of this small collapse and our thoughts and our pros of being with the families ever since then. We'd also, I think, all in this House like to thank the Honourable Paul Boulanger for his work on this matter, for the report on this matter, for the recommendations he's made. We're doing the report. We're working together. We're looking at the recommendations that are contained within it. Some of the recommendations that have come forward we've already acted upon, Speaker. So I know that the one engineer has been charged under the Occupational Health and Safety Act in relation to the small collapse. The individual was charged as a professional engineer for endangering a worker as a result of providing negligent advice and as a worker for working in the manner that may endanger a worker. Speaker, we were all saddened at the news. I think it's the intent of this House that this type of tragedy never happened again in the province of Ontario. Thank you. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Premier. Good morning, Premier. Speaker, the Liberals keep saying they're being transparent. They say they're telling the whole story on Mars. Yet, on page one of the agreement that the Liberals signed with Mars it says OILC has advised the borrower that its loan application number 11039 date is August 2nd, 2011 has been approved. But Speaker, the actual application paperwork for the loan is nowhere to be found. Premier, where is the application? On Mars. Development, employment and infrastructure. Economic development and infrastructure. Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. We have I have instructed my Deputy Minister to release all documents that were requested both during the time at estimates that I spent with the member and request from the media and all requests for information have been released, Mr. Speaker. These loan programs, the application process is online. And if a request is made to release that application we're happy to do it. I've actually seen the application. There's nothing in it you don't already have. But it's something we're happy to I'm happy to ask my Deputy Minister to have a look at just to make sure that it's something that's suitable for release and if it's his determination that it is be happy to release it. Thank you. Supplementary. Well, let's cut to the chase, Speaker. It's the business case for the loan that they made to Mars. You haven't done it? The loan speaker, by the way they had to bail out in secret during the election and now, Speaker, they're not even releasing the loan application yet. This government still hasn't explained why this multi-million dollar project contingent on an 80% occupancy in order to be worth the investment was allowed to go forward. What is the premier so desperate to keep away from the public? Thank you. Minister? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I'm glad the member modified his supplementary question to put the word yet in because I just said yes to his request and I'm not sure why he would not take that as an answer but, Mr. Speaker, we've released all the information we've been asked to release and lo and behold, Mr. Speaker, the information just confirms what we've been saying all along. Mr. Speaker, we've made an investment by way of a loan that is 100% secure to ensure that phase two of Mars can continue and get built. It's been built. Mr. Speaker, now the key is to make sure it gets leased up. We've made an interjection in the transaction by buying out ARE to ensure that that can now happen. I'm awaiting advice from Michael Nobrega and Carol Stevenson but they've told me that this project is not a failed project. With their advice, we should be able to get it back onto a positive keel. So, Mr. Speaker, I hope I have the member's support when we get to that point. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This question is for the Minister of Education. Minister, this week is Bullying Awareness and Prevention Week. In Western Mississauga, we have an outstanding school that's done some groundbreaking work in creating an open, supportive and accepting learning environment for all students. St. Joseph's Secondary in the Dufferin Peel Catholic District School Board won a Premier's Accepting Schools Award last year for its accomplishments in creating a gay-straight alliance formed by a group of students who wanted to connect in a safe space. In Mississauga, St. Joseph's has provided Ontario a template for excellence in a productive learning environment. Minister, what has Ontario done province-wide to help all students feel safe while learning? Thank you, Minister of Education. Yes, thank you, and I'd like to have my congratulations to St. Joseph's Secondary School in Mississauga for winning the Premier's Award. But during this week I hope that everyone will take some time to consider the issue of bullying and the role it may be playing in their lives or the lives of others. Every student has the right to feel safe and accepted at school. If the students don't feel safe, they can't be at their very best. So that's why I'm so very proud of our Governments Accepting Schools Act. The Act requires boards to provide supports for the bully, the bully and the bystander, and requires principals to investigate all reports of bullying. The governments invested over 425 million in safe schools initiatives that are helping make Ontario safe. We've defined bullying and legislation and we are making great progress on the whole issue of bullying prevention. Well, thank you, Minister. St. Joseph's Schools Their work is led by its principal Jeff Quinville, whom I've come to know and respect. In fact, Jeff himself is one of this year's award winners for building an accepting school climate. The Administration and staff at St. Joseph's have developed a healthy and respectful relationship among students throughout the entire school and in the surrounding community. When this house considered bullying in Bill 13 last year, it saw that repeated persistence and aggressive behaviour directed at an individual or individuals does cause fear and distress. Bullying involves more than physical and verbal violence. It includes social and cyber bullying. Minister, how is Ontario addressing cyber bullying in respect to kids, computers and cell phones? Thank you. Yes, thank you and thank you to the member for this very important question. Cyber bullying has been a concern of our government and the safe schools action team for a number of years. So that's why the Accepting School Act explicitly defines cyber bullying as part of its definition of bullying. If a principal believes that actions occurred online had a negative impact on the school climate, the principal legally has the authority to take action and Ontario is actually pretty unique in that respect because we know that when students bully each other outside of school online and come into the school they don't feel safe and then they can't succeed. So we know we need to have a way for principals and teachers to intervene in the size of the bullying and the life of the students so that we can ensure that schools are a safe and accepting place for all our students and that we will not tolerate bullying. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Premier. Speaker, municipalities are still waiting for the millions the government promised to help them clean up from last year. They have yet to see a dime. My question is this how many thousands of dollars that should be going to municipalities for disaster relief is instead being spent on consulting fees? Good question. Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Well Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the question and let me just try to bring as much clarity to it as quickly as I can. Our government in response to some input from and a number of communities that were stricken with difficulties, I think there were 53 that qualified, responded by putting in place a $190 million fund that could be drawn upon. We of course met with and provided training sessions for municipalities as to how to complete the accountability paperwork that was necessary. They're working very, very hard at that. All of those sessions by the way were done internally by ministry staff. Sessions were done. Municipalities are processing their claims as quickly as as quickly as they can and Mr. Speaker, I'm pleased to say that that's the paperwork we're releasing that money. Thank you. Supplementary. Thank you, Speaker. I didn't hear an answer there. The Liberals hired a consulting firm to manage the process so far with nothing to show for it. Now the government is telling municipal staff to register for a two hour long webinar just to learn how to fill out the paperwork. Wow. Who's putting on the red tape webinar? Land link. Who's in charge of reviewing the applications? Land link. Who's paying for all this? Tax payers. How much will it cost? Liberals won't say. Does the minister really have so little money in his own ministry that he would sign a secret deal with a private consulting firm? Or did he do it to evade accountability like the Liberals did with eHealth and Orange? Good question. Mr. Speaker, I just did a quick check with one of my colleagues here around consulting fees and just adding to my answer in 2001-2002 the progressive conservative when they were in government invested $650 million in consultants. In the last three years our figures under $300 million. So we're working hard to curb the hiring of separate consultants and doing the job in order to see very hard with municipalities around their needs something that government didn't do a lot of when they were in power. Thank you. Thank you. My question is to the premier. This government maintains that healthcare is not one of the ministries that will be cut by 6% according to their budget. In my community of Hamilton and Mountain people are proud to be employed in healthcare serving their neighbors who may need that care. Lakeview Lodge is one of those places. It allows cancer patients receiving care at the world class facility to stay close by. They don't have to travel back and forth while they receive treatment that often makes them very sick. There they receive immediate attention by trained medical staff on site unionized staff who can assess their needs and send them for emergency care at the nearby cancer center if they need it. But now Lakeview Lodge is slated to close. During cancer patients out to find lodging at area motels. My question is simple. Does the premier think this is acceptable? Thank you. Minister of health and long-term care. Minister of health and long-term care. Well thank you Mr. Speaker and I'm happy to speak with the member opposite about this specific situation that she's described in Hamilton. But the accurate response to this question Mr. Speaker is that we are making massive and significant investments in health care in our province including in cancer care right across the province and including in Hamilton Mr. Speaker and to the point where cancer care Ontario and our cancer prevention and treatment support system in this province is seen as among the best if not the best in the entire world Mr. Speaker. So it denies Mr. Speaker that there may be a local situation I'm happy to speak with the member opposite to get a better understanding of precisely what her concerns are but I think it's important that Ontarians understand the significant investments and what they're providing for the people. Mr. Speaker but I don't think the minister was listening I was talking about the facility next door so the reason that lake we're told that Lakeview must close is because of the freeze of hospital budgets in the last three years by this liberal government with the NDP and what many others have said is that all these cut our amount in our health care system. My constituents know and want what are non- we want to know what these non-union non-health care cleaning staff are supposed to do when a cancer patient becomes sick from chemotherapy. Will the people in these motels know how to handle and dispose of it properly? Now these patients will have to take cabs and ambulances back to the hospital if they're urgent where before a nurse would be able to respond. Speaker, it's this government's policies that have shut down Lakeview Lodge. Is the premier going to intervene to keep Lakeview open? Thank you Thank you Mr. Speaker and again this is a decision that was made by the local hospital Mr. Speaker and it simply isn't true to talk about a lack of investment in our hospitals when in fact hospitals operating budgets in the last 10 years in this province have gone up by an average of 50% Mr. Speaker so we expect this in this particular case as we would expect anywhere in the province that the hospital and the Linn that's supporting that hospital that they will continue to provide support to any changes made to the housing of patients whether they be cancer patients Mr. Speaker or other patients that are in need of housing support so again I'm happy to talk with the member opposite but we continue to support our hospitals the funding has increased dramatically over the past decade. Changes are being made as we transfer more of that support into home and community care so that individuals can appropriately be cared for as close to home as possible. Thank you Thank you. Your question? Thank you Mr. President Thank you my question is for the head of Treasury Board. The Ontario Public Service has once again been chosen one of Canada's top 100 employers for 2015. I would like to offer my congratulations to the Ontario Public Service and in particular the members of the OPS who live in my riding of Burlington who have and continue to serve our province with unflinching dedication decade after decade. I am proud to say that we have a dedicated and committed individuals in our public service it is an honour and a privilege to work with them. We rely on their advice, professionalism and expertise to help us make Ontario the best place to live, work and do business They deliver vital services to our citizens in communities large and small and help propel this province forward Minister, can you please tell this house how it is that the OPS has been chosen and recognised once again with this great honour Thank you President Well thank you Speaker, thank you to the member from Burlington for this really important question Speaker, this award gives us a great opportunity to say thank you to the public servants in this province who work so hard for Ontarians every single day Being seen as a leading employer speaker is important to attracting and retaining the best and the brightest for the OPS and it's not the first time the OPS has won this prestigious award in fact it's the fifth time that the Ontario Public Service has been chosen a top 100 employer in Canada Transformation of our public services continue to move forward to change the way public services are delivered in Ontario to give Ontario families the best possible value for money and streamline access to the services that they need we're counting on our public service to drive that change We have the best public service in the world and I'm very proud to work with them every day Supplementary Thank you Minister, I agree as I'm sure would every member of this house who has worked with the extraordinary, talented and dedicated members of our public service we can't say enough about the important work they do and the significant contribution they make to our province The OPS is instrumental in creating and implementing the policies and programs that Ontarians rely on and we are thrilled that their achievements are being recognized and commended as a model employer I imagine there is stiff competition amongst employers to be chosen for one of these awards which I understand were announced in the Globe and Mail two weeks ago and what criteria is used to choose the top employers Thank you President I'm delighted to provide a little background Each year an organization media conducts research into the recruitment histories of more than 80,000 employers across Canada then they invite 35,000 organizations to apply for Canada's top 100 employers competition 80,000 employers and we were chosen in the top 100 participants provide a detailed description of their operations, HR practices including key areas such as the physical workplace the work atmosphere, health, diversity environmental leadership assisting recent immigrants, charitable efforts and community involvement winners are selected based on comparisons to other organizations within their respective sectors and I'm delighted to say that western university was also chosen at top 100 employers and we'll continue to lead by example set the highest standards possible and for other employers to emulate these prestigious awards acknowledge those accomplishments Thank you Speaker Thank you Mr Speaker A question for the Minister of Education Minister yesterday in a friendly liberal question you said and I quote by playing games the opposition is delaying implementation safety measures for our children and to quote I know I've asked questions in this house we participated in rallies across the province we have asked for committee travel to Ontario's municipalities I've met with the Ombudsman we have started petitions in opposition to the flawed bill 10 we will propose amendments to bill 10 and finally we have answered hundreds of letters of emails that your members ignored Minister we have done our job as official opposition you on the other hand have simply time allocated debate and committee time on this very important yet very flawed bill so Minister can you explain to the house and to the people of Ontario exactly what games we are playing and will you stand in your place and do the honourable thing and actually apologize for such a rude comment Minister of Education Yes certainly and I'm very proud of bill 10 because what bill 10 is for the first time ever it gives our ministry it gives my inspectors the authority to deal with unlicensed child care violations now I want to make it sure unlicensed home child care is a totally legitimate and part of the child care scenario in Ontario and we expect it to restay that way but what we do want to do is make sure that no matter what form of child care someone chooses be it a child care centre home care either licensed or unlicensed that every single form of child care in Ontario is safe if people have the rules my inspectors now have or will under bill 10 will have the authority to deal with it Well Minister she didn't say anything about boss playing games she said it yesterday in a friendly question you proudly mentioned last Friday I know as a fact that participants from the independent child care providers had no idea that you would attend that meeting it was to be the Ottawa area Liberal MPPs only it was a surprise that you were in attendance I guess you just happened to fly into the area but let's face it you kept it a secret from the public because you knew that it would draw a demonstration double the size of the 300 plus who rallied outside of your office in Guelph on November the 9th so Minister who's really playing games the official opposition or the Minister of Education who's not the courage to face and speak to people on a badly fought bill 10 Minister we just demonstrated games playing some woman with brown hair and a brown car drove by my office has anybody ever seen me I have white hair that's games however I was really excited I was really excited to be able to with home care providers and the child care provider research network in Ottawa and I actually think it's a great opportunity for me to be able to have a calm private a conversation where we were actually able to sit down and discuss the issues I actually think that's what a Minister or any other MPP actually needs to do which is to sit down and calmly discuss issues Thank you No question, the leader of the third party Thank you Speaker My question is to the Premier The gridlock crisis is getting even worse in Thunder Bay Regional Hospital There have been too many patients and too few beds of this year in fact the hospital declared gridlock for almost four months straight this year and every day that it operates 36 unfunded beds are being operated to meet the needs of the resident speaker beds that receive no funding at all from this Liberal government Does the Premier think it's acceptable to leave Thunder Bay Hospital stuck in gridlock? Minister of Health Well of course not Mr Speaker and we're not leaving them to deal with this challenge on their own in fact I recently was in Thunder Bay and joined in fact by the two members the member from Thunder Bay Superior North and the member from Thunder Bay Attic Hoken great members who are very concerned about the situation of healthcare and their localities as they should be and we're making important progress and the hospital itself acknowledges and acknowledges in that meeting the challenges that they are facing and in fact it was not that long ago this year Mr Speaker that we announced an additional $14 million specifically to deal with the challenges faced by Thunder Bay Regional Hospital the kinds of pressures that the leader of the third party has indicated and this additional funding specifically is going to support not just Thunder Bay one institution but the three largest healthcare providers the Regional Health Sciences Center St. Joseph's Care Group and Northwest Community Care Access Center to solve these problems Well Speaker according to Thunder Bay Regional Hospital it will take years for the gridlock problem to be fixed with the current level of funding that they're receiving from this liberal government the hospital says it is quote experiencing an erosion an erosion of its ability to meet its acute care services mandate a disgrace speaker Thunder Bay Regional Hospital is a stretch to the limit because this government simply will not fix the problem Premier exactly how many more years will the people of Thunder Bay have to wait for this liberal government to fix the gridlock crisis at their hospital Thank you Well Mr Speaker we are fixing the challenges faced by Thunder Bay Regional Hospital Well I know the member perhaps doesn't agree with this but we are giving them precisely what they ask for and that $14 million of funding it's helping them recruit up to 10 full-time and 14 temporary emergency room doctors to improve access to urgent care staffing 10 new acute care hospital beds to treat up to 600 more patients per year Mr. Speaker expanding a nurse outreach program to provide up to 500 more seniors and people with complex needs with home care creating 26 new hospital beds to help more people with long-term illness or disabilities receive care and funding up to 17 more spaces in supportive housing to help our seniors and people in need of care remain independent Of course Mr. Speaker there's always more work to be done but we're actually working coordination and collaboration with the regional hospital with the local MPs that I meant MPPs Mr. Speaker it's working we're making progress I hope that the member of the third party has that Thank you Mr. Speaker my question is for the minister of northern development mines Mr. Speaker yesterday my federal counterpart from Ottawa south questioned the federal government on their commitment to the ring of fire the question underscored its national importance it was alarming to hear the federal minister of natural resources attempt to defend the federal government's absence on the development of the ring of fire Mr. Speaker all members of this House recognize the importance of the ring of fire to Ontario's economy and understand the development is a project of national significance Will the minister of northern development mines please share how our government is stepping up to the plate and showing real leadership in the absence of the federal government who would rather be on the sidelines Thank you Mr. Speaker I will acknowledge that I was startled if not somewhat irritated by the stunningly inaccurate statements or comments that were made by minister Rickford in the House of Commons yesterday so let me once again just be very clear about our absolute commitment to the ring of fire as we are leading to drive development in that extraordinarily important economic development opportunity despite a lack of any similar commitment from the federal government we've been absolutely clear in our one billion dollar commitment to develop transportation infrastructure we have established a ring of fire infrastructure development cooperation and we're working with our partners to move that forward and we've reached an historic framework agreement with the Metawa First Nation Speaker when the federal government says they're waiting for us to demonstrate that this is an actual priority that is nothing but an excuse and excuse for their complete lack of commitment Mr. Speaker the minister has made it clear the ring of fire is indeed a priority for our government highlighted in a more recent budget and last week's fall economic statement the ring of fire is an incredible opportunity for communities across this province and across Canada and while I appreciate the words of encouragement we'd all be farther ahead if they directed them towards their federal cousins here here the ring here is made clear that our government is committed to leading the way on this project with minimal potential up worth up to 60 billion dollars can the minister please share how our government recognizes the need to work collaboratively with all parties when it comes to infrastructure development in the region the heckling from the other side of the house is pretty interesting because I think it shows their embarrassment about the fact that they're not going to stand up on the infrastructure in terms of access to the ring of fire and the development corporation itself is a significant step toward building it we're working very closely with First Nations closely with industry and we're working with communities across the province so that we can find the best way to tap into this extraordinary potential of the ring of fire we are going to continue to move forward with the support of the premier and all of us on this side of the house to make sure that this project moves forward it's time the federal government stepped up to the plate with their funding so that we can signal but not only that but Canada is actually open for business can you see it please can you see it please start the clock please thank you new question the member from Hullam & Norfolk Speaker to the Minister of Health I'm proposing legislation to better enable Ontario to deal with emerging infections diseases, West Nile Lyme, Ebola there seems to be much work to be done on many fronts diagnosis, treatment, prevention treatment of Lyme disease for example is fraught with conflicting medical scientific, political social dimensions disputes that are long overdue for resolution social media has been accused of politicizing the issue communicating inaccurate information pitching dubious sometimes expensive treatment there's also allegations of shortcomings in the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme directed at Main Street Medicine Minister we have government for a reason are there no adequate mechanisms in place to deal with some of these disputes thank you Mr. Speaker and I appreciate the question in fact the opposite is true there are many measures, policies and procedures in place in fact the member opposite knows not only that this government and my ministry is committed to protecting the people of Ontario from vector born and zoonotic diseases but we have effective policies and programs for all of the items that the member opposite mentioned surveillance, prevention, control of zoonotic and vector born diseases including promoting importantly the public awareness of these diseases and also emergency preparedness and I appreciate the timeliness of the members, private members because of the preparations that have been underway for quite some time in terms of a bowl of preparedness but you can appreciate Mr. Speaker being a public health specialist myself with significant expertise precisely in these areas that these you know I looked at these policies and procedures and I look at them with great scrutiny Mr. Speaker I'm happy to continue in the supplementary thank you minister over the past several months I've developed legislation attempting to use a neutral objective science based research based approach to emerging diseases like Ebola and Lyme I am calling on your ministry to legislate a provincial framework an action plan accomplishing surveillance educational materials as well as guidelines for prevention, identification diagnosis, treatment and management including emergency preparedness and sharing best practices the private members bill comes up this afternoon it mandates research as well as collaboration consultation with all concern and in particular with the public not many people know what's going on they get information from websites and CNN but they're set of a gap so minister there presently is no legislation requiring all of this are there any reasons why you would not support such an approach I welcome the private members bill in fact I'll be participating in the debate later this afternoon about it I can't speak for my colleagues but I will be supporting the bill this afternoon but I do want to say just so there's no confusion or anxiety out there that every part of the reason largely the reason I can support it is because everything that bill 27 is proposing is already in place to protect the people of Ontario from vector born and zoonotic diseases but I sincerely want to thank the member from Haldeman Norfolk for bringing this forward I'm looking forward to the discussion and the debate and quite frankly we can always do more so our government is very open to having discussions on how to continue to improve the surveillance and the prevention and control of our vector born and zoonotic diseases thank you Mr. Speaker my question is to the Premier Premier the latest report from Ed Clarke says there is a market for the Ontario power generation's access like the smaller hydroelectric stations in Niagara Falls despite how important they are to the Niagara region and their place in the city of Niagara Falls the latest from Ed Clarke implies they will be selling these stations can the Premier elaborate on Ed Clarke's report and tell the people of Niagara if the government is planning on selling their hydroelectric stations the simple answer is no thank you supplementary well that's good how much time I got left to figure this out so I'm good the last part of the question just so we can get that no more than once once again I'd like to know if the Premier is intending on selling these stations and if so when will your planning on consulting with the people of Niagara and I'd like to hear that answer again thank you thank you very much Mr. Energy I'm going to say very simply again I'm going to ask a question a question from Halton thank you Mr. Speaker my question is to the Minister of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs Minister if you were to drive down a street in my riding it wouldn't be unusual to see farms and fields on one side of the road and subdivisions and box stores on the other side that's because Halton is one of the fastest growing areas in the country and Halton has been the fastest growing municipality in Canada for close to five years but with that remarkable growth in such a short period of time comes congestion, traffic jams and infrastructure challenges these challenges put undue stress on people's lives and our economy investing in infrastructure is one of the most important things we can do to improve our quality of life and jumpstart our economy so communities can move forward I know that as part of the 2014 budget our government created an infrastructure fund for small rural and northern municipalities Mr. Speaker can the Minister please update the House on this new roads and bridges fund Minister thank you very much Mr. Speaker that truly was a very impressive question from the member from Halton I might add that my brother and sister are actually residents of the member who built Ontario and Gord Crans who just got elected again is one of the outstanding bears in Ontario but more importantly Mr. Speaker we have a 10 year economic plan that's investing $130 billion in infrastructure investment making communities in the Halton region grow each and every day and a key step in our 2014 budget is to delivery the $100 million infrastructure program at northern municipalities we built that program in cooperation with the rural Ontario Municipal Association the Association of Roba and all those partners to make this a great success and the member from Halton is doing an outstanding job in getting those investments in her community in the region of Halton one of the outstanding areas of Ontario the member from Goma has a point of order I'd like to introduce a good friend of mine Karen Cameron who is the Executive Director for the Independent School Bus Operators Association I look forward to having lunch with you along with our critic and discuss business I'd better acknowledge this one the president of the church Thank you Speaker and although I introduced them earlier they weren't right here so if everyone could just turn a wave at my dad up in the gallery there I'd like to comment anyway thank you for that warm welcome of our visitors we have a deferred vote on the motion of third reading of bill 15 enact to amend various statutes in the interest of reducing insurance fraud enhancing tow and storage services providing other matters regarding vehicles and highways calling the members this will be a five minute bell members please take their seats November the 19th Madame you move the third reading of bill 15 it's time to be recognized by the clerk Mr. Sousa Mr. Bradley Mr. Shirelli Mr. Matthews Mr. Hoskins Mr. Sandoz Mr. Quinter Mr. Tachar Mr. Bardinetti Mr. Gravel Mr. McMeacon Mr. Murray Mr. Chan Mr. Zimmer Mr. Delaney Mr. Dixon Mr. Prack Mr. Wong Mr. Sergio Mr. Del Ducca Mr. Domerla Mr. Frasier Mr. Anderson Mr. Baker Mr. Ballard Ms. Hogarth Ms. Cuala Ms. Gary Mr. Milch Mr. Nidoo Harris Mr. Rinaldi Mr. Renil Mr. Fidele Mr. Houdak Mr. Hardiman Mr. Wilson Mr. Yacobusky Mr. Clark Mr. Dunlaw Mr. Jones Mr. Thompson Mr. Monroe Mr. Walker Mr. Smith Mr. Nickles Mr. McDonnell Mr. Pettipies Mr. Sing Mr. Harvath Mr. Vantop Mr. Tabin Mr. Miller-Hamilton East Stony Creek Ms. Sattler Ms. Taylor Ms. Armstrong Ms. Forrester Mr. Mantha Mr. Hatfield Mr. Campbell Mr. Gates Ms. Gretzky Ms. French The ayes are 71, the nays are 18 The ayes being 71, the nays being 18 I declare the motion carried Third meeting of the bill. It is now resolved that the bill do now pass and be entitled as in the motion. There are no further deferred votes The bill stands recessed until 1 p.m. this afternoon.


As said on Business News, the House of Representatives is called on the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, to put a hold on the introduction of electronic transactions in the import and export business in Nigeria. This follows the motion by federal lawmaker representing Kogi State, Honourable Leke Abedjide at Plenari on Thursday, frowning at the issuance of a secular run guidelines for import and export businesses in the country on the 21st of January, which is to take effect from February 1st, 10 days after issuance of the said guidelines. He said the sudden monetary fiscal secular, which was horribly implemented, can lead to policy somersault, stating that such policy changes should have a 90 days grass period to enable it to run its full cost in order to avoid distortion in the economy and also to avoid price distortions of trade. Disturbed that issues in the guidelines are contradictory for instance, guidelines C and D contradict each other. Why guidelines C states that no importer or exporter may effect payment to direct or credit of any foreign supplier, unless the electronic invoice has been authenticated by authorized dealers bank, presented together with the relevant document for payment, but guidelines D state that content of the electronic invoice authenticated by authorized dealer bank is only advisory for Nigeria Custom Service. The House resolved to, one, urge the central bank of Nigeria to suspend the policy with immediate effect to enable adequate sanitation of the workability of the policy in all major ports of entry, including seaports, airport and border stations. Two, invite Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria to approve the Committee on Customs and Exercise with the assurances that the target revenue of 3.1 trillion given to Nigeria Custom Service by the Federal Government of Nigeria, which Nigeria Custom Service on its own increased the target to 4.2 trillion, will not be distorted by disordered policy implementation.


Stevenson falls in their season opener today 15-5 to Salisbury with the head coach the Mustangs coach Kathy Rayleigh coach You know, let's go through the good and the bad right and let's start with the good Into the second half tie game against the number one team in the country defending national champions Obviously from there did not go your way How do you reflect on build off of the good and and how do you reflect on all of the bad? Well, I think that We're very focused on on everything that happens in a game that may not have a positive Spin to it. We're gonna really use those negatives or use those issues or challenges To make ourselves better. We're really trying to focus in on Getting better with every minute today that didn't happen. We came out very energized. We came out very confident We went into the magic locker room and it evidently sucked every ounce of energy out of us To the point where we just couldn't keep it together anymore You know, there were some really great things about today and there were some things that we can see we we can work on now And so it's we got to look at it as a helpful situation. So I just think that there was a change in tempo I think that that We didn't get some calls when you know We're getting checked in the face and checked in the body and we didn't get some calls And I think that there was some frustration with that that just kind of sapped the energy. So We'll go from there glad I mean we got a lot to work with Salisbury when you're not doing everything right They're gonna make you look terrible. So You know, I was glad to have that challenge in the second half We'll be ready next week to rise to that kind of challenge. Let's again Let's do good and bad right the good Caroline scores four goals picks up where she left off She's Caroline Murphy. We know what she can do the bad There was one other goal, right and and and not really a ton of great looks in there What needs to happen offensively for more players to get involved and to get some better look well We have to execute our concepts and we did not today and even in the first half We were very clumpy. We were not working off ball. Well, and we were not following the game plan of what the play was You know when Carol had her looks it was Carol with an exceptional play or an exceptional move Or an exceptional shot. I think we ran the play well twice where we were able to hit a feeder situation Where somebody's open which is in the design as far as what the play design was We did not execute it 90% of the time today And I can't really figure that out because we have pretty much all experienced players on the attack So I don't know where the breakdown was. We talked about it at a halftime. We talked about it at the quarters It just we talked about it at the time out and there was just very little work off ball in a way that made sense So we're not going to go back to the drawing board We're going to try to really fine-tune What the concept is and how we're going to execute at a we need to execute at a much higher level Had we executed I do believe that the game score would be extremely different Had we executed when we had it you did get to see a couple of your newcomers today They did get to see you know Zimmer and Van Ember couple of players What did you see from those players and how excited are you about what they can do is we get further along right? So so the biggest issue for the new players is they just have to get seasoned They have to understand they're gonna make mistakes and it's not the end of the world Today is a great example of a game where every single player we had made some mistakes And to not crumble when that happens is a really great lesson for our freshmen You know Kellyanne played great Zim hustled every single time that she went in we were able to go a little deeper with Katie and Maddie You know, I think that we did a really good job of getting kind of their feet wet with that And but they're gonna have to if we're gonna have a go They're gonna have to mature really quickly know what the plays are know how to execute the plays And I did think they handled pressure pretty well as far as hands-on and you know that kind of thing. So that's good You build off what you can build off of right? That's the way it works. Coach. We have a lot Hey, we have choices time to do it is the important part. It's good to see it. It's good that you know It's the cross season. We like those things and we'll look forward to seeing you back here in two weeks coach Thanks taking the time. Thank you. She's Kathy Rayleigh. I'm Glenn Clark. Go Mustang sports calm