Doedd cysylltu gynnogi argylcheddau, yn gweithio, o holl m dependsu arlesiau drws. Diolch i drafod ddechrau, ddweud. Ie, ddaw ni'n gwneud ddechrau yn Gwyrttin, palon diddymian, ddau'r prysgwyr. Rhaid i'r SNP cyfuol sy'n gweithio am Llywodraeth Cymru yn y gynhyrchu. Roedd hyn yn i'r holl o'r berthynas i'r hosbelyd yn weithio ddwylliann 24-hysgrif. Mae'n ynnigoddiad yn ychydig tân o'r gymhoeddu NHS yn gennym. A phos o gydafnutu'r ysgrifennidol oedai, mae'n dουςiect i мираeth. Y Wislloblwyr yn ystafell. Mae rhai o'r fryd i gyllteidiaeth. Felly, we are struggling to provide first world care in what feels like a third world environment. Given that, how can the First Minister say that the health secretary has done all he can to support NHS staff and prepare for this crisis? First Minister, in relation to reports in the media this morning about staff in Greater Glasgow and Clyde being asked to work 24-hour shifts, that, as I am assured by NHS Greater and Glasgow and Clyde, and as the board has said publicly, is not true. Let me just quote NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, there is absolutely no truth to these claims. The NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde does not ask nursing staff to work a 24-hour shift and there was no prospect that any staff member would need to work for 24 hours to suggest otherwise is inaccurate and misleading. I would not expect any health board to request any member of staff to do that. Secondly, staff across the national health service in Scotland, indeed staff across the national health services in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, are struggling right now. They are doing an extraordinary and a magnificent job and my heartfelt thanks go to all of them. They are struggling in the face of unprecedented pressure on our national health service, pressure from Covid, even more so in recent weeks from flu and, of course, from other respiratory illnesses. We hope that pressure will abate in the weeks to come, but in the meantime, the Government continues to do everything possible to support NHS boards as they address those pressures. Lastly, in relation to the announcement from Greater Glasgow and Clyde last night, as I said on Monday, we have empowered NHS boards to take action that they think is appropriate to protect critical and life-saving care. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde has paused non-urgent elective procedures in order that they can prioritise urgent treatment and cancer care, and I would expect that to be for a very short period. That is my final point. It insults people's intelligence to suggest that the problems being encountered in the NHS in Scotland, which are the same as the problems being encountered elsewhere, are somehow down to the health secretary. Is it, for example, the fault of Humza Yousaf that the kind of action that Greater Glasgow and Clyde announced last night has also been taken in health services in South London, in Surrey, in York, in Scarborough, in Derby, in Leicester, in Nottingham, in Southampton and in Portsmouth? I probably could go on. Those are unprecedented pressures that we continue to support our NHS to address. Douglas Ross, how can nationalist MSPs actually clap such a despicable answer? From Scotland's First Minister, in Scotland's Parliament, about Scotland's national health service. Let's ignore the nationalist MSPs. Let's look at what medical professionals are saying. They are damning about this Government's response to this crisis here in Scotland. On Monday, the First Minister placed some of the blame for the grave situation in A&E departments on, in her own words, unnecessary attendances. Dr Laila Peel, Deputy Chair of BMA Scotland, criticised patient blaming language saying—and those are her words—that shows a lack of understanding of the current crisis. We have analysed the figures and Dr Peel is spot on. There are fewer people in A&E now than there were in the years leading up to the Covid pandemic. The problem is not unnecessary attendances. Fewer people attended A&E in the first week of this year than they did in 2020, 2019, 2018 or 2017. Will the First Minister accept that the blame lies with her Government and not the patients? Everybody, including me—certainly not me—is blaming patients. It is the case. Let's hear the First Minister. Unnecessary visits to accident emergencies, unnecessary attendances and admissions to hospital are not in the interests of patients. That is why we are working hard to make sure that where patients can be and should be treated elsewhere that happens. Let me just take the points made by Douglas Ross in turn and let's look in detail at demand and why the figures that he has quoted are actually the case. There is absolutely no doubt that demand on our health service right now is higher than it has been for some time. If we look at calls to NHS 24 over the festive period, the highest demand in a decade, if we look at emergency calls to the Scottish Ambulance Service higher in the most recent week than the average of the four weeks before, the reason that they are not all translating into attendances at accident emergency or admissions to hospital is because of the work that NHS 24 and the Scottish Ambulance Service are doing to avoid that. The NHS 24 now provides advice and, where necessary, treatment to the vast majority of patients during the initial call that they make. Most of the calls to the Ambulance Service are treated through sea and treat, so the patients are not taken to hospital.  That is part of the reason why we have pressure on our hospitals. The waiting times in E&E, of course, are a reflection of the fact that occupancy in our hospitals is so high, which is why we are focused on speeding up discharge from hospital where appropriate. Finally, we listen carefully to engage with work with health professionals each and every single day. It would be hard for me to find the words appropriate to describe my respect for our health professionals. However, elsewhere in the UK this week, we have seen health care professionals on strike. They have not been on strike in Scotland because of the work that this health secretary has done and because of the respect that we have for our health care professionals. Douglas Ross I think that those words may come back to haunt the First Minister, but if we are judging cabinet secretaries on sector striking, I would hate to be surely unsumberable right now, I have got to say that. We have just heard it. The First Minister is doubling down on her patient-blaming language. The problem is not too many people attending E&E. The problem is this Government's handling of the NHS crisis here in Scotland. Dr Peele said that exit block is the problem in E&E. The Government has known this has been a huge issue for years. The First Minister was defending her position in the last answer by saying that people are getting sicker, but people healthy and ready to go home cannot get out of hospital because the First Minister and her Government have not dealt with bed blocking. They were failing to tackle this before the Covid pandemic and now it is worse than ever. New reports today state that the number of avoidable deaths is now 60 people a week in Scotland. That is 60 families across our country, grieving every single week the loss of a loved one who could have been saved. Will you confirm those tragic figures? What I will absolutely confirm is that when people wait too long for treatment, that has severe consequences potentially for patients. That is why we work so hard and will continue to work so hard with the health service to reduce long waits for treatment, whether that is an accident emergency or whether it is for elective care on our national health service. I was not to use Douglas Ross's phrase, doubling down on anything. I certainly, for the avoidance of any doubt, am not blaming patients for anything. It is in the interests of patients to make sure that, where appropriate, they can be treated outside of hospital because it is not in the interests of any patient to end up in an accident emergency unit or in a hospital ward just because treatment is not available in the community. What I was doing was trying to, because it is obvious from his questions that Douglas Ross does not understand this, explain the flow of patients through our national health service and why we see longer waits in accident emergencies because of over occupancy in our hospital wards. Finally, on the exit block, the significant chunk of what I and the health secretary set out on Monday was about tackling delayed discharges. We understand from our daily engagement with health boards that we have seen delayed discharges reduce slightly in recent weeks, but there is much more to do. That was the reason for the interventions and the additional funding that I indicated on Monday in the health secretary set out to the chamber on Tuesday. We will continue to be focused on providing the support and making the interventions that are necessary right now to help the NHS during this period of unprecedented demand. Let me remind Douglas Ross and the chamber of unprecedented demand that has been faced not just in Scotland but all over the UK and indeed in much of the rest of the world as well. Douglas Ross. The First Minister can throw insults at me if she wants. I was quoting, well, she laughs at this, you can laugh at that First Minister if you want, but I was quoting a front-line doctor in Scotland's NHS who happens to be the deputy chair of the BMA in Scotland. But the First Minister effectively confirmed those tragic figures that we heard this morning are correct. 60 avoidable deaths every single week in Scotland's NHS confirmed by Scotland's First Minister and Scotland's health secretary is making the situation worse, not better. Here's just one example of what we're experiencing across Scotland. On Hogmanee, a family visited their 80-year-old uncle. He's had major part surgery, hip operations and often struggles to breathe. When they arrived, they discovered he'd fallen and broken his neck. The family dialed 999 seven times and it took more than 12 and a half hours for the ambulance to arrive. Seven emergency calls, 12 and a half hours for our 80-year-old who had broken their neck. His niece told us that ambulance crews were brilliant, but we are disgusted at what our uncle has been put through. This dire situation confirms yet again that this health secretary and this Government is not on top of this crisis. His failures are creating risk to lives across the country. First Minister, surely for the good of Scotland, it's time to sack Humza Yousaf. If I raised a smile in response to Douglas Ross, it was not directed at any health professional. I suppose what I was raising a smile about in very challenging circumstances where everybody right now is Douglas Ross accusing anybody else of insults. Every single day with the health secretary, we'll continue to take the actions that are necessary to support our NHS during these very difficult times. I said earlier on that I don't take anything for granted and I am not intending to sound complacent at all about this, but it's because we respect so highly those who work in the front line of our national health service that we are offering them right now a much higher pay increase for next year than any other Government anywhere else in the UK and thus far we have avoided industrial action in our national health service and we will continue to do everything we can to make sure that that continues. We are also supporting health boards to address the reasons for long waits in our national health service, whether that is waits for an ambulance or waits in accident emergency or long waits to be discharged from hospital. That's why we announced the action that we did earlier this week. There are too many patients right now waiting too long for treatment and we will continue to do everything we can to address that while we hope that the pressures caused by Covid and by flu in the main abate over the weeks to come. That should not take away from the fact and this is true in the ambulance service, it is true in our accident emergency units, it's true in our GP practices, it's true across our hospitals and other healthcare settings. The vast majority of patients in this country, even during these extremely difficult times, get excellent care on our national health service and that is down to the dedication of those who work in it and that's why they have my grateful thanks each and every single day. Yesterday Jackie Baillie and I hosted a health summit with front-line NHS staff, representative organisations and experts working across our NHS. They told us that our NHS is broken and the system is failing, that they are being asked to do the impossible and that every day this crisis puts patients' lives at risk and they were united in telling us that the cause of this crisis is not Covid, is not the flu, is not strep A and is not winter pressures. They say that this is a crisis that is 10 years in the making but the First Minister does not agree. So why does she think front-line NHS staff are wrong? I don't think that front-line NHS staff are wrong in what they say but I don't know why it took until yesterday for Anna Sarwar and Jackie Baillie to meet with health service professionals. The health secretary meets them regularly and I have engagements as well. What health service professionals say to us what I'm sure they said to Anna Sarwar yesterday is that, yes, there were pre-existing challenges in our national health service that go before Covid. We were taking action to address those, so if you look at funding in our national health service, front-line health funding has more than doubled under this Government. It's higher per head of population than it is in other parts of the UK. There are almost 30,000 more people working in our national health service today than when this Government took office. More healthcare professionals, whether that's doctors, qualified nurses or across a range of different professional groups than there are per head of population in other parts of the UK. We will continue to work with front-line healthcare professionals to deal with those challenges. What I take issue with Anna Sarwar on is that somehow it is not the case that Covid and flu is having a very significant impact on those pressures. There are right now over 1,200 patients with Covid in our hospitals. Anybody who says that is not having an impact on what we're dealing with right now frankly is not dealing in reality. In the couple of weeks I think leading up to Christmas or over the Christmas period there were 1,000 patients a week with flu admitted to our hospitals. Anybody who says that is not a significant factor in what we're dealing with right now is frankly not dealing in reality. That's a comment directed at Anna Sarwar, not at healthcare professionals who are dealing with these issues each and every day. So whether it's on NHS pay, whether it's on record staffing numbers, we will continue to support the NHS during these difficult times as we always have done. Anna Sarwar. I think it's pretty clear from that answer who's not dealing with reality and it's Nicola Sturgeon and her SNP Government. She might not want to listen to me but she should listen to the organisations, the Royal College of Nursing, the Royal College of Midwives, the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, the Royal College of General Practitioners, Glasgow Local Medical Committee, the British Medical Association in Scotland, Unison GMB Unite, all saying they've heard the excuses before, they don't believe it and they think that the First Minister is not doing enough because the sticky plaster approach will not solve the problem. We heard directly from staff about the impact that this crisis is having on them. They told us in their words that this is causing them moral injury. That is personal distress and trauma because they can't provide the care they know their patients need, psychological and mental trauma for our NHS staff. One of them said that the conditions that we're working in meant no dignity, no respect, no safety for patients. The BMA and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine have both said in stark terms that this crisis is leading to avoidable deaths and they predict that that could be as many as 60 avoidable deaths a week. The experts tell us that what was announced this week will not be enough to address the problem. So why can't the First Minister see that her sticky plaster approach is not working? First Minister, we'll continue to take a range of actions. What we announced this week was, in addition to the actions already being taken and of course the record investment that we are putting into our national health service in the next financial year supported by the tax decisions we are taking, asking those who can most afford it to pay a bit more in tax. We'll see an additional billion pounds going into our national health service, so we will support investment and where it is appropriate and in the interests of patients, we will support reform in care and patient pathways within our national health service. Nothing Anna Sarwar has said to me today hasn't already been said directly to government by healthcare professionals because we engage day in and day out with them. They are dealing with unprecedented pressures right now. Some of that does necessitate longer-term reform in our national health service but some of that is absolutely being caused by the winter pressures that have been at their peak in recent weeks. I would hope that, over the coming weeks and very soon, we will start to see flu levels reduce significantly, for example, and that will start to reduce some of that pressure on our hospitals. The situation with Covid remains more unpredictable and volatile, given new variants that are circulating. I hope that we will see some of that pressure abate but that will still leave a challenging situation in our health service, which is why the investment, the increase in staffing and the reforms continue to be so important. No government anywhere has a single solution to this right now but this government remains focused on taking the actions that are necessary, which is why I think that we do continue to have the trust of the people of Scotland as we do so. Anna Sarwar The First Minister is just not listening and the approach is not working. This is not just a crisis in winter, this is a crisis that is all year round and Nicola Sturgeon's excuses will not wash. The crisis in our NHS is not because of Covid, it is not because of the flu, it is not because of the strep A, it is not because of winter pressures, this is a crisis 15 years in the making. The result is the longest ever NHS waiting list, 750,000 Scots waiting, the worst ever A&E waiting times, 2,000 people a week waiting more than 12 hours, record levels of delayed discharge, 58,501 NHS bed days lost a month as a result, after 15 years of the SNP our NHS is broken and the system is failing. Staff are being asked to do the impossible and patients are being asked to accept the unacceptable. Lives are being lost, isn't it the case that the people that caused the problem can't be the ones to fix the problem? First Minister, on the latter point that is of course always up to the people of Scotland who they trust to be in government to lead the country through challenges. Of course there were challenges in our health service before Covid, I have never sought to suggest otherwise and the actions we were taking around investment, staffing, reforms to patient pathways are designed to address that. There are record numbers of staff in our health service right now, almost 30,000 more than when this Government took office and of course more staff per head of population than anywhere else in the UK. That is the reality. I think that people watching at home listening to Anas Sarwar, around one in 25 of the Scottish population that have Covid right now, the many people watching at home who will be suffering from flu and other respiratory illnesses right now, to hear Anas Sarwar say that the fact that we've got 1200 Covid patients in our hospitals right now or that a thousand patients with flu have been admitted a week in recent times to our hospitals, to hear Anas Sarwar say that that has got nothing to do with the pressures on our NHS, we'll wonder what on earth Anas Sarwar is talking about. So we will continue to work with, listen to those on the front line of our national health service as we continue to strive to give them fair pay increases and as we continue to support them to deliver excellent care, as even during these tough times they continue to do for the vast majority of patients across our country. Question number three, Alex Cole-Hamilton. Thank you very much, Presiding Officer. Do you ask the First Minister when the Cabinet will next meet? First Minister, Tuesday. Alex Cole-Hamilton. I'm very grateful for that reply my opposition colleagues are quite right to raise the crisis in our NHS and Liberal Democrat research has quantified just how bad things are. Last year we discovered that one in six people who couldn't get a GP appointment actually carried out a medical procedure on themselves or got somebody else to do it. Presiding Officer, Maria is 22 years old. She is a Ukrainian refugee who has been living in Scotland since the summer. She suffers from a hormonal thyroid condition which requires regular testing and treatment but when she presented to her new GP she was faced with an unexpected dilemma. The wait was so long that it actually made more sense for her to risk travelling back to a war zone to see her doctor in Kiev and so she did. Presiding Officer, the air raid sirens, the drone strikes and cruise missile attacks of the Ukrainian capital were less daunting to Maria than the wait for treatment in Scotland's NHS. That is appalling. These are the risks that people are taking for the sake of their own health and all for the want of basic access to primary care. So can I ask the First Minister, is she embarrassed by this? I don't know the circumstances beyond what Alex Cole-Hamilton has narrated of that case and it would be wrong for me to comment on an individual case. What I do know is that we again continue to support general practice. There are more GPs per head of population in Scotland than anywhere else in the UK, 83 GPs per 100,000 population here compared to 63 in England, 63 in Wales, 75 in Northern Ireland. We of course have a target that we are right now working towards delivery of increased numbers of GPs. We have recruited more than 3,000 members of the wider multidisciplinary teams in general practice and primary care. Access to GPs like access to other parts of the health service right now are challenging and very challenging for some patients and we continue to work to address that. We will continue to do that with record investment, record support for recruitment and in partnership with those working so hard across our health service. To ask the First Minister what the implications for Scotland and the Scottish Government are following Met Office reports that temperatures in Scotland and the UK reached the highest on record in 2022. The Met Office figures underline that we are already experiencing climate change impacts in Scotland. We must adapt to those changes and prepare for further impacts of global climate change, which are already locked in. We are currently preparing the third climate change adaptation programme for publication next year to succeed the current programme. Those programmes respond to the UK climate change risk assessments, which present the best available evidence in climate projections from organisations across the UK, including of course the Met Office. The climate change committee has urged that risks from higher temperatures be prioritised in the upcoming programme, and we are working across government and with public bodies to ensure that we improve preparedness for a projected increase in hotter years in the future. Those figures are indeed alarming. Across the world... We will have a brief suspension. Thank you, members. We will resume, and I call Fiona Hyslop. So, those record temperature figures are indeed alarming. Across the world, we are seeing more extreme weather experiences with increased flooding and extreme heat at home. And every government bears acute responsibilities to tackle this climate emergency. With the draft Scottish Government energy strategy published this week and the climate change committee's critical report published in December, does the First Minister acknowledge that this Government now needs to accelerate actual delivery on housing and transport emission reductions and adjust transition to renewable energy? Will she ensure that the Government's budget is sufficient and that public bodies ramp up on delivery as on current trends we won't be meeting our ambitious net zero targets? I absolutely agree with Fiona Hyslop on all of that. It is worth pointing out, of course, that the energy strategy published this week with the just transition vision alongside that was in part about how we accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels in a fair and just manner to renewable and low-carbon sources of energy. I think that that is really important. We must remain focused 100 per cent on delivering our policy programme across the whole of society. That includes transport and the heating of homes. We have to decarbonise the energy system, as I've just said, and the draft energy strategy goes into detail about how we do that. We must make sure that the climate change plan reflects all of that. A draft of that will be published later this year alongside sectoral just transition plans setting out a clear path for emissions reductions. We need to make sure that the investment is in place to back all of that up. The Government remains focused on that. We often talk about it in terms of a challenge. Much of it is challenging, but in all of that there are massive opportunities for Scotland that we must see. Maurice Golden Thank you, Presiding Officer. By 2050, they could be well over 100 heat-related deaths a year according to the UK Climate Change Committee. Adapting buildings for cooling will be key to avoiding a worst case scenario. I welcome the joint work with the UK Government on that. Can the First Minister confirm when an assessment will be ready of the cooling systems required for current housing stock? On the question of when an assessment will be ready, I will come back to the member with a precise answer on that. I absolutely agree with him that this is an important strand of work, how we decarbonise heat in our buildings and the cooling of buildings is incredibly important as a part of the overall delivery of our climate change objectives. We will continue to work where necessary in partnership with the UK Government, because some of the levers and powers lie with the UK Government. I will be seeing the Prime Minister later this evening, and I am sure that one of many issues that we touch upon will be one of many. Those are all important. I am sure that we will debate all of those issues, the detail of them robustly in this chamber, but I also hope that there will be a lot that unites us as we live up to the responsibility on our shoulders to help combat the climate emergency. To ask the First Minister for what reason two ferries that will serve Islay are being built in Turkey. In line with relevant procurement legislation, the ferries currently being built for service on the Islay routes were awarded following a full and open tendering process led by SEMA, which of course is the procuring authority. The bid received from the shard represented the best value for money in terms of quality and price. The climate change committee's report last month was not just critical. It was devastating in exposing this Government's failures on the environment and emissions. Is the First Minister comfortable that the steel for the two ferries is coming not from a Scottish steel mill—there is one around 40 miles from here, for example—but rather from China, the world's largest polluter whose steel sector is the second-largest contributor to its emissions? First, on the procurement decisions over recent weeks, the leader of the member's party has questioned me in this chamber rightly so and seemed to suggest that somehow we hadn't followed proper procurement policies in the award of other ferry contracts. It's really important to stress that, in all those matters, we comply with relevant procurement legislation. In terms of the steel, of course that is a matter for the company that has the contract. The contract awarded as a standard international shipbuilding contract and, as such, the decision regarding materials and equipment lies with the shipyard. However, I understand that the shipyard may originally have intended to source steel from Ukraine, but I have had to look elsewhere. Those are decisions that the shipyard will take, and I am sure that they will apply all necessary objectives to the decisions that they reach. Those two new ferries will each be able to carry up to 450 passengers in 100 cars or 14 commercial vehicles, giving a combined 40 per cent increase in vehicle and freight capacity on the Isle route. That represents an improvement for islanders and businesses and underlines the Scottish Government's commitment to our island communities and the ferry network. Does the First Minister share my view that questions such as the one that we have just heard reiterate the fact that the Tories are interested in politicking and not people when it comes to the ferry network? First Minister, I think that Jenny Minto on that last point is absolutely right. More importantly, I think that people the length and breadth of Scotland, including in our island communities, will draw their own conclusions from the approach that the Conservatives take to those issues. Jenny Minto, who of course represents in this Parliament a number of islands, is absolutely right that the award of these contracts is good news for islanders and island communities. That is why it is important that they are progressing well. I understand that there will be an update on steel cutting and keel laying in the coming days, so we will continue to take decisions that are in the interests of those living in our island communities such as the decisions that we are talking about right now. To ask the First Minister in light of the extension of bus fare caps in England whether the Scottish Government supports capping bus fares in Scotland for those aged between 22 and 60. The first thing to point out is that Scotland already has the most generous concessionary fare scheme in the UK. More than 2.3 million people in Scotland are eligible not for capped bus fares but for free bus travel in Scotland. We continue to develop and assess options to create a fairer and more transparent system of fares to maintain and increase affordability for those who need it. That is exactly why we are progressing the fair fares review. That review is considering cost and availability of services and the range of discounts and concessionary schemes available on all modes, including bus, rail and ferry. The maximum cost of a single bus fare in London is £1.65. In this city in Edinburgh it is £1.85. In Manchester, Liverpool and West Yorkshire, where Labour members have taken control over transport, it is £2. It is £2 in Cardiff and now it is £2 in every part of England for the next few months. Yet in Greater Glasgow it can be as much as £2.65 for just a two-mile journey. We really do not need a fares fare review to tell us that is not fair. It is time to capped fares at greater public control of buses and for a bit of urgency. In a cost of living crisis, why are people in Scotland paying amongst the highest bus fares in the UK? Neil Bibby am its to say in that question is people over 60 do not pay anything at all for bus travel, which I think is replicated in other parts of the UK, but in Scotland nobody under age 22 pays for bus travel either. It is not capped, it is free. 2.3 million people across our country are eligible for completely free bus travel. In terms of the question of capping costs for those who do pay, it is right that we progress any proposal like that through the fair fares review, so that we properly consider cost and availability of services and the whole range of discounts and concessionary schemes that are already available. That is exactly what we will continue to do. Let me say yet again that it is a fantastic statistic and reality. 2.3 million people in Scotland do not pay anything at all. They do not pay a single penny to travel by bus in Scotland. Thank you. We will move to general and constituency supplementaries. I call Christine Grahame. I am referencing the exchanges on the pressures on the NHS. While I understand that there are some 2 million people of access, the flu vaccine, 90 per cent or so, when they were getting their winter Covid booster, is there more that can be done for those eligible to access this? This flu is very serious indeed. Yes, uptake levels for both Covid and flu vaccines are high and that is to be welcomed, but we will continue to promote vaccine uptake for those who are eligible but have not already been vaccinated. We will, of course, think most carefully about those in the most vulnerable groups. However, if we look at older care home residents in Scotland, those are figures, I think, for the first week in January. Almost 90 per cent vaccinated, which is higher than both England and Wales, for those over 50-77 per cent are vaccinated again higher than other parts of the UK. However, we will continue to work hard to encourage everybody who is eligible for a vaccine to take up that eligibility. The First Minister is more than aware of the crisis that is facing the NHS. Last week, a whistle bore got in contact from the accident emergency department within the Victoria hospital in Kirkcaldy, expressing their concerns that patients were waiting for over nine hours to be seen and that patient examinations were being conducted in the ambulances in the hospital grounds. Staff within the department believed that a major incident criteria was met but were not allowed to call or declare it as such. Can the First Minister confirm that no political direction was given to NHS Fife or any other health board for that matter to ensure that a major incident was not called and will she agree to investigate why staff were not allowed to follow standard protocol? I said on Monday that the health secretary has confirmed this to health boards in writing this week that it is up to health boards seeking advice and guidance from government where they think that that is appropriate, but it is up to health boards to take whatever decisions they think might be appropriate to prioritise critical and life-saving care. In fact, Douglas Ross started his questioning to me today by criticising the fact that Greater Glasgow and Clyde have effectively done that by pausing non-urgent care in Glasgow. Excuse me, First Minister. Members must treat one another with courtesy and respect. I would appreciate it if there could be no interruptions at the moment. I am making the point that the action that Greater Glasgow and Clyde announced last night demonstrates that health boards have the flexibility where they think that that is necessary to take that action, and that is right and proper. The fatal accident inquiry into the tragic fire at Cameron House Hotel more than five years ago reported yesterday. I want to thank the sheriff and the Lord Advocate for their assistance in getting to this point. The report included a range of recommendations designed to prevent that from happening again. Will the First Minister give a commitment today that all recommendations will be implemented as a matter of the utmost urgency? Will she also consider whether the fire brigade requires further enforcement powers as both Cameron House and the more recent fire at the New County hotel in Perth appear to have been warned of fire risks but did nothing about them? First Minister. First, in relation to the FAI report that was published yesterday, I am also very grateful to the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Service for their work on this extremely important fatal accident inquiry and for publication of the report. Let me also mark my thanks again to the emergency services for their response on the night of the fire and, of course, my condolences again to those bereaved in this incident. Of course we will thoroughly consider all the sheriff's recommendations. I would expect that, yes, we will accept all the recommendations but we have to go through a process of considering them properly and we are required to respond to them in due course and we will do that. In terms of enforcement, I think that in light of Cameron House and indeed the more recent incident in Perth and my condolences go to the bereaved in that incident as well, I think that it would be right that there is a look at enforcement provisions. Under the Fire Scotland Act 2005, the fire service are appointed as the enforcing authority for fire in Scotland and is part of that. They produce all relevant enforcement procedures while applying the principles contained within the Scottish regulator's strategic code of practice. As the enforcing authority, the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, work with duty holders in relevant premises to achieve compliance in fire safety through providing advice and support and where necessary, taking enforcement action. Those systems are set out very clearly but, of course, as part of our consideration of the recommendations of the sheriff, we will ensure that all appropriate aspects of this are looked at in an appropriate way. The Tory UK Government continues to show contempt for workers with their proposed anti-tread union legislation. Does the First Minister share my concern about the impact that she plans to have on the rights of people working in devolved public services? Will she join me in condemning and opposing this brazen attack on trade union rights? This is a really important issue, Presiding Officer. The UK Government, I think that it is important to make this point, already has the most anti-tread union laws in Western Europe, but this bill threatens to undermine and weaken the rights of workers even further. We strongly oppose any bill that undermines legitimate trade union activity and does not respect fair work principles. I think that, as Governments, we should be working with the public sector and with trade unions to reach fair and reasonable settlements respecting the legitimate interests of workers, not trying to pour fuel on fires or take away workers' democratic rights. Those will be points that I make very strongly when I see the Prime Minister later this evening. Gorgie City Farm, which gives volunteering opportunities to disadvantaged young people and adults, as well as providing a wonderful green play space and learning space in one of the most urban parts of the capital, is due to close on Monday. I know that the First Minister will be aware of the incredible value that this community facility provides as she has previously visited one of Scotland's last urban farms. What emergency support could be made available to help to keep the farm going in an interim period? Will ministers also agree to meet with myself, council and local campaigners to discuss a way forward to save the farm? I have visited Gorgie farm, so I am very well aware of the excellent work that it does and its real value to the community and, I think, to Scotland as a whole. Of course, if there are any reasonable steps that the Government could take to support a way forward, we would certainly consider doing that. I will ask the relevant minister to meet with the member, the council and representatives of the farm if that would be helpful and appropriate to consider any options for the future. I will ask that that is taken forward with all due haste. Mother, in my constituency, has provided me with data showing that this year, for many courses at the University of Edinburgh, outside of very welcome widening access places, there were zero Scots admitted. For Scottish peoples from ordinary families and an average school, the doors are closed, no matter their mind or their endeavour. For 440 years, the University of Edinburgh is admitted among the best and brightest of Scotland. Walter Scott, Catherine Grainger, Stuart MacDonald, Robert Louis Stevenson, Joanna Cherry, all great minds who worked hard and gained entry to study law here in our capital city. With funding frozen for 13 years and the SNP's cap on Scottish students, the historic promise of a Scottish education is broken. After five centuries, First Minister, how has it come to this? I am actually quite gobsmacked that that question has been put in that way by a Labour member of Parliament. Let me first of all give these facts. A record number of young people secured places at university in this latest UKS cycle. A record number of 18-year-old Scots have secured a university place. Up 20 per cent since 2019, in the last year, there were exams. The data provides a really positive story for those applying from deprived areas. 18-year-old securing places from the most deprived areas have increased by 31 per cent since the 2019 cycle, and all aged acceptancies from the most deprived areas are up by 4 per cent. That is where I take issue with Michael Marra. In my earlier days as First Minister, I used to be regularly criticised for the fact that there were too few young people from deprived communities going to university. Now I appear to be being criticised for the fact that there are too many going to university. I did not come from a deprived background. I came from a working-class background. I went to a state school. When I studied law at Glasgow University, I was very much in the minority, so I think that it is really good news. Within a context of a record number of young Scots at university, I think that it is really good news that we are seeing more from the most deprived areas actually going to our universities. Thank you, Presiding Officer. The First Minister will be very aware that there are people from Tory and other Aberdeen campaigners here today. They are angry that they face losing their communities last remaining green space, Synthetix Community Park. Tory contains the most concentrated area of multiple deprivation in the north of Scotland. Losing Synthetix will be detrimental for residents' health and wellbeing and bad for wider social and environmental justice. Will the First Minister support Tory residents and others' calls to save the park for current and future generations by using powers under the Town and Country Planning Scotland Act 1997 to ensure Synthetix is not re-zoned for development? I know that there is a strong feeling on this issue. However, Aberdeen City Council has notified ministers of their intention to adopt the local development plan, and ministers will now consider that. As part of our scrutiny, we will consider previous Scottish Government recommendations and check on whether reporters' modifications have been fully translated into the modified plan. Of course, ministers will set out a decision in due course. Thank you. That concludes First Minister's questions. Point of order, Alexander Burnett. Thank you, Presiding Officer. I note the First Minister referenced live data when talking about the current delayed discharge situation. As far as I am aware, the live data is not public. The Office for Statistics Regulation has made clear that, when information is used to publicly inform Parliament, it should be published in an accessible form. If she will seek the First Minister to make a commitment to publishing that as soon as possible. Thank you, Mr Burnett. That is not a matter for the chair, but your comments are on the record. There will be a brief pause before we move on. There will be a brief suspension before we move on to members' business.


Hey guys, welcome back to coming in TV the only place on YouTube. We're all geek culture collides. I'm Shannon and today on the show We're taking a look at the Transformers siege war for Cybertron This is chromia. Let's go ahead and Set her off to the side real quick We'll take a look at the packaging This is a deluxe class This side is the same as all the other sides In the Transformers siege war for Cybertron Toyline side has chromia. There's the back Pretty cool I do really like the Vehicle form of chromia looks a lot better than the robot form But I usually keep my transformers in robot form So anyway, let's go ahead and move this off to the side It does come with Directions It's been a while since I've Transformed chromia So I will be working off the directions quite a bit I did not transform her beforehand like I usually do just because Filming these back-to-back. I just finished filming star screen and I Filmed Megatron right before that I'm not sure if I'm gonna do the Transformers bumblebee movie bumblebee Or not in the near future It's pretty difficult to transform. I do not like the movie Transformers There are a lot there's a lot more into their transformations than the siege and all those others so I May hold off on that transform them a lot more before I do I do also have trigger happy But I've already filmed a review of trigger happy for caveman reviews So I'm gonna wait until he releases that video and then maybe a Week or so after he releases that one. I'm gonna refilm it For my channel. So anyway, chromia is a she She's a female Transformer. I don't know much about her other than that She comes with this gun Let's go ahead and lay her down because it's difficult for her to stand and this gun. It's actually four parts you got These pieces here And in this piece you can actually Transform it several different ways Okay But we're gonna move it off to the side because we're gonna need those a little bit later Now the main thing I do not like about chromia is This crotch piece It likes to fly off So We're gonna try and Transformer With crotch piece on if it starts falling off. I'm just gonna take it off and leave it All right, so anyway First thing you want to do bring her arms up just like that make her reach for the sky Turn her head Around No, I hadn't even noticed that before really Okay So you'll turn her head around Then you'll clip her feet from behind you'll Put her feet just like that And they clipped together But I'm not sure if you want to do that right now Yeah, we'll go ahead We'll clip them together Okay, once that's done we need to Bring these down just like this and we'll bring Fold these like that Now I'm getting a little bit ahead of myself, but Almost have to this figure you flip this part out and it Attaches These little pegs here go right up in there Just like that. All right then Once that's done You don't want to bring that around like that Okay, we're gonna go ahead and Lower her head Just like that And then once that's done Bring her arms down Like that and they kind of sit they clip right in there on both sides Okay, and then her hands Come up like this. All right Once you do that and peg these pieces into her hands or They can also peg in there, but I like to put them in her hands because it actually Gives her hands something to do other than just Sit there and look weird, but I guess if you put them up here Kind of hides The hands a little bit I guess now normally that cross piece always Pops off when I'm transforming For some reason they didn't do it this time Which is fine by me Go ahead and angle this down So you guys can see then you'll clip the gun There like that you put This piece according to the directions Pop it in just like that and there you have chromium and it's pretty good Make sure everything's clipped into place She rolls real well the Cockpit does not open up, but very nice. I Like it like I said the only Only problem I have with chromia is a lot of times That crotch piece will flop off. I don't know why they made it a separate piece I really don't they should have just sculpted it in to the mold but it is what it is and Then these arms They don't really Peg in that tight and like from behind they really should have had something that goes there So that you don't really see the hands But that's it Pretty nice figure. Yes Nice figure She looks a lot better in Vehicle mode than she does in robot mode But that's just my personal opinion. I still display her in Robot mode because I display all my transformers in robot mode. They sit better on my shelf that way The wheels do move so yeah There you guys have it Transformers Siege war for Cybertron Chromia They have these at least at my local Walmart. They have a few of these on the shelf just sitting there so You might want to you might want to pick them up pretty decent transformer Not too difficult to transform But like I said, she doesn't peg together Nearly as tightly as some of the other transformers. I don't know if that's because she's a deluxe class or what but They should have probably worked on that and they should have really made that crotch piece part of the mold rather than a separate piece So I hope you enjoyed this video Make sure you hit the like button if you did Leave a comment down below and let me know if you like chromium some of the other transformers you may like and Yeah, I'll see you again real soon geeks. Take care If you enjoyed that video make sure you hit the subscribe button right there so you can stay up to date on all Thanks geek culture Also, make sure you check out one of these two playlists on the side for more videos Just like the one you just watched I'm Shannon for coming in TV the only place on YouTube. We're all geek culture collides. Take care geeks


Hello, everyone. Welcome to my presentation. My name is Naveen Joy, and I am an upstream contributor with OpenStack. My presentation is about using a reliable ETCD-based messaging architecture for OpenStack. So here is what I'll be talking to you about. First, I will give you an overview of what is VPP and what is networking VPP. These are the projects that I'm working with currently. Then I will walk you through what's ETCD and how we are using ETCD with our project, that is networking VPP. And finally, I will show you how we could use ETCD with OpenStack and what are its benefits. So what exactly is the problem here? First is, if you have worked with Neutron, OVS is a default virtual switch used in OpenStack deployments today, and you may be aware of this. So what is the problem? OVS works very well for standard cloud use cases, such as if you want to push 10 gigabits of data, and if you want to do bulk transfer of big packets, there's no problem. Everything goes very well. So if you try to push small packets, actually iMix packet, you will realize that OVS doesn't scale very well, which is I'm not talking in general about OVS, but the default virtual switch in OpenStack doesn't scale very well.  So these packet sizes are just 1 fifth the size of normal cloud packets. And the average data rate is also very high. It's five times higher. And if you generate these kinds of packets, you will realize that your performance has deteriorated really rapidly. So how to solve this problem? One approach is to use VPP. What exactly is VPP? Vector packet processing is another V switch. It can support both layer 2 and layer 3. And what it does is that as shown here, it uses DPDK. If you're familiar with DPDK, just for those of you who are not familiar with it, DPDK stands for Data Plane Development Kit. It's also an open source project under the Linux Foundation, much like OpenStack. And what DPDK does is that it provides various data plane libraries and also NIC drivers that you can use. And by using DPDK, you'll be able to push packets at a much higher throughput. So if you look at this diagram, look at the Linux kernel that's sitting on the side. Normally in a Linux machine, you will find the NIC cards bound to the Linux kernel. Now in this situation, you can see that the NIC cards are bound to DPDK. So that exactly is the case. You are able to bypass the Linux kernel and you are able to push packets directly using the DPDK software to the NIC. So if you use Linux kernel, the problem there is that Linux kernel is very bad at caching packets. So you have a lot of CPU time that is being used there that's causing latency. With DPDK and vector packet processing, you are able to manage the caching and optimize that cache layer.  In this way, you're able to get much higher network performance. It runs completely in the Linux user space, as you can see here. So VPP is able to do fast network IO directly sitting in the user space, which means that if you want to do switch upgrades, v-switch upgrades, you don't really have to patch the kernel or reboot your machine. You're able to directly, much like any user application, you're able to upgrade your v-switch. So that is an overview of vector packet processing. Now what is networking VPP? So networking VPP enables you to control VPP within OpenStack. So if you try to install VPP and use it without networking VPP, you will have to directly work with it. And that is pretty complex. So networking VPP makes VPP easier to consume within OpenStack. And for attaining this high performance, we host user sockets to talk to virtual machines, more on this later. We support the following network types today. We support flat VLAN and VXLAN GP. Essentially, networking VPP is like a control plane for the VPP platform. This is how the architecture looks like. So networking VPP is exactly an ML2 driver for Neutron. As you can see at the top, you have the Neutron server and the mechanism driver. Then you have, on each of the compute nodes, you have the v-switch, which is the VPP installed. And there is an agent that's running, which is called the VPP agent program that is responsible for programming the VPP on that node based on what you tell it to do using the Neutron APIs. Then ETCD is a messaging framework that we use in our deployment. So what you can do is you can either use a single node or you can set up a redundant ETCD deployment using a three node quorum. And it can tolerate a single node failure. And you can also see here that we are also set up journaling. So when you tell the mechanism driver to do a certain task, at that point, what if you restart the software? You will lose that data. So we will save that state in the database. And then from the database, we write it to ETCD. So we have got that journaling to protect, restart. For those of you who are new to ETCD, what exactly is it? It's a distributed key value store. And it is also open source. It's available on GitHub. The simple way to put it is an application can use the ETCD APIs to read and write data. And it can also support TLS, certificate-based authentication and role-based access control for security. EBO and beyond, ETCD provides a reliable way to store and distribute state data across a cluster of machines. That's a fundamental role of ETCD in our project. It also supports versioning. So data is stored as a version key value pair. And in that way, you can easily roll back to a previous release. So if you're using today, RabbitMQ is being used as a messaging framework. And it works on a command-based architecture. So there is no real way to restart or if you want to roll it back to a previous release, there is no real way to do that. You'll have to go back and execute the same set of commands that you did earlier. So it's a command-based rollback. Whereas ETCD provides a state-based rollback where you can just add a previous pair of keys very easily. You can bring it up and then convert your system back to an old state much easily. If you're familiar with Kubernetes, this is exactly what the way it does, using state-based model of communication rather than a command-based model. You can also watch the data for changes. And it can enable applications to react to these changes in the key value pairs. So how are we using ETCD? So we are using it to store and distribute network states. As I mentioned earlier, the MariaDB database of Neutron is kept in sync with ETCD. And the VPP agent program that is running on each of the compute nodes will observe the desired state. So to give you an example, when you create a VM, a virtual machine, or rather, NOVA makes a call into Neutron to provision a port for that virtual machine. So we receive that call. And then what we do is we write that information into ETCD, of course, going through the journaling process. And at that point, the agent program on which the virtual machine is being spun up, that receives an ETCD watch event, OK? So OK, there is a VM coming up. So go ahead and create a port. So the agent will now do the needful. And it will compare the desired state in ETCD. And then figure out that, OK, I need to create a port. It is not there. And it will go ahead and do that. So it will push the necessary changes into VPP to match the desired state that you told it to do. And there is also a re-sync mechanism here. The VPP agent will fetch the desired network state data from ETCD. And it will compare it with the actual state when you restart it. So it's able to even react to those changes because the key value pair is actually stored within ETCD. It can read all of that and compare it against what is the current state and then program the actual deltas into the V-switch. Unlike RabbitMQ, where it's a command-based model, once you send a command, it's done. So if you restart it, there is no way for it to go back and figure out what command you execute it. So a state-based model is much more efficient and reliable. Here is an example of an ETCD key value. Here, let's say there is a node named Node1. And you want to create a port. So this is a key that is stored with the port ID. And then the value, as you can see, is a JSON data structure. This is a key value that is stored in the ETCD database and communicated to the agent that is running on that node. So it has now all the information that it needs to be able to create that port. So what are some of the considerations when using ETCD? The data has to be small. It cannot handle bulk data. And fast disks are essential because it's very sensitive to disk latency. And you can also get out-of-order events. For instance, if you're running, let's say, a configuration where you have virtual machine with security groups and you restart the agent, you may get a message to create security groups before a virtual machine is created. So you will have to write code to handle those out-of-order events as well. Now finally, how can ETCD be used in OpenStack? So currently what we are using is we are using RabbitMQ and AMQP. So AMQP functions as the broker and the software components communicate by sending messages. Instead of messages, excuse me, by sending remote RPC calls, that's basically a command-based model. So when you provision a port, a call is made to an RPC call is made to create a port and then it receives a response, basically a command that's being sent. So what is the problem? It's hard to scale. That's why you need to have a complex solution like CEL. You have to split it out and then hard to roll back. And it's pretty complex if you think the way that NOVA is designed today using CELS. So if you replace RabbitMQ with ETCD, you have a much higher scalability and robustness using the state-based model of communication. So this is something to think about and we have been successful using this in our project and I wanted to share this with you all. So that concludes my presentation. Thank you everyone for coming and have a great evening.


If you see the marketing of business concepts, what Amur has got in the last 70 years, but I am really following some of them. Like, Amur is using best ingredients, natural original ingredients to make products, which I think Patlaki is also using. And they are also distributing their products well, which Amur is doing. And also they are trying to price their product reasonably well. I say value for money. And they are not adding hefty margins. And what's very important, they are also marketing, petitioning or advertising their product nationally, what is best. What is, what will protect is better, they start telling other stories. The Amur Topical Company is 50 years old and now people recognize it is top of the mind. And we commanded anything happening important in India or the world. Whereas if you come up with an emotional campaign, story campaign, that will look good on the TV. You like to watch movies also. But I don't think whether it had value to your product. That's why you forget. That is the purpose of making campaign. Campaign you have to make where people record your brand. So, and you ask anybody, Amur, immediately they'll say, oh, your potato picker campaign is very good. So that is the purpose of campaign.


I'm just in Edmonton here at the Hadoop Summit. Got Scott Capiello from MicroStrategy, he's going to fill me in on what you've been working on. How are you, sir? Good, how are you? Very good. So give me a little bit of insight on what you're seeing here at Hadoop. Yeah, you know what's different this year? I've been to Hadoop Summit for three or four years, and I think what's different this year is the level of maturity, both in terms of the customers on the panels.  We've had, you know, folks from Yahoo or Facebook or LinkedIn who are actually working on the code trying to explain to other people. Now we've got customers really saying, here's how I've actually used it in my organization. Smart, now let's talk about customers. What are your customers most interested in right now? Yeah, so MicroStrategy is a leader in business analytics and our customers expect enterprise caliber tools to work with. So our integration is primarily through Hive and there's been a lot of interest in connecting BI tools to data to store in Hadoop and Hive is a natural way to do it, but Hive is maturing. And I think what we're seeing now is with some of the advancements that Horton has put into Stinger and really improving the response time of Hive, similar to what Clouder is doing with Impala and all the other SQL in or on Hadoop technologies are really making it possible to have a BI-style dashboard with interactive response times on top of your data that's in Hadoop. Is that one of the items that's important to your customers, having a dashboard or having a method of easily looking at things? I mean, some people feel that it's the solutions that are just too complex, too complicated. You're losing interest for one and then just the ability to really dive in. Yeah, well we want to get the data that's in Hadoop out of not just the hands of the data scientists but also the business analysts, people who don't want to write map-reduced jobs, they don't know Java code, they don't want to do Hadoop streaming, they don't want to write SQL. They want to use a graphical user interface so they can get through a BI-2 like Microstrategy to interact with data, do reporting, get the answers to the questions they need with the data that happens to be in Hadoop. There's a lot of talk about these data silos and all this information that's being stored. For the folks that are at that stage, they see the value in it, they're collecting it. They haven't moved on to the stage where you could help them with, give us some use case scenarios and some real life benefits that you've seen. Yeah, so while the desires have the interactive response time on top of data that's directly in Hadoop, we are seeing use cases today where you can use Microstrategy's in-memory layer to extract some of the data from Hadoop and it's a nice compliment to the big questions that may take a long time in Hadoop versus the stream of consciousness kind of questions you can ask through our in-memory layer. So we are seeing use cases today. In fact, Yahoo is doing a session later today on exactly how they've used our in-memory layer with Hadoop in that example. Fantastic. Well, how about industries? Are there industries that you feel it's more pressing for them to kind of get on board and make this happen? I think it's across the board. I don't know if there's any one particular industry that jumps out. We've got customers who find out services and retail. Those are the two that I think we probably see most, but it's not exclusive to those. I think really any industry's interested in it. Let's talk about the difficulty in starting. I mean, a lot of people are just, they anticipate that first step, trying to gather all these data sets together and make some sense of it. Is it to the point where this can happen without a whole lot of pain on the IT side? I don't think it's pain so much. I think, in fact, I think it's actually pretty easy to get started. I think it's, probably the difficulty is really getting value out of getting started. You can start dumping log files into Hadoop fairly easily. It's the next process after that, whether you can find people with skills and experience in Hadoop. That's probably the bigger challenge. So getting started is easy, but mastering it is what's hard. What about expectations, then? Folks that, they hear that this is the next big thing. They hear there's the future, but when they start, you're not necessarily able to immediately get that value that you talk about. How are expectations being set and how is that being managed? And I think it's important to make clear that if you're looking for Hadoop to be a cheaper version of your data warehouse, that's not the right expectation. And it's not also not a good way to launch a project in your organization. You want to find a use case that is different from what you can already do with Enterprise Data Warehouse and learn from that.  And then as the product matures, you can look at, well, are there things we're doing today with current technologies that maybe we can shift over to who? But that's definitely a second step. Fantastic. So for folks that are ready to move into that, what's the best way to get in touch with you or follow you on the social network? Yeah, you can always go to Microstrategy's website. We have a Twitter feed and Facebook presence there. We also have a Microstrategy's annual user conference in Europe is coming up in two weeks from now as well. We can get an invitation to that. We'll see about that. Fantastic. Winston Edmonds in here with Studio V. Microstrategy, signing out.