Tuesday's MLB DFS slate is one that's defined by putting good pitchers in a really tough spots and Objectively bad matches because some of the top guys for tonight. You got Lucas G. Lido. He's facing the blue Jays Kevin Gosman Facing the white socks. We've got Frankie Montas going up against Houston. Those are some of the guys I turn to most often in daily fantasy baseball and those are the matchups I go to a lot of them least often and it's a tough balance this side, okay How much do I value the pitcher? How much do I value the matchup and then decide is this guy worth it? Does he grade out better than other options on the slate and decide where to rank them all things considered? It's a tough tough dilemma first day for shirts We'll break things down. We'll let you know where I come down on these guys and rank them all for MLB DFS Welcome on into the solo shot. That's right here on the fan dual podcast network in number fire comm My name is Jim Sonnis I am a senior writer and analyst for number fire comm here to preview Tuesday's 12th game of May in the slate with lock set for 705 p.m. Eastern for tonight in Chicago for the Cubs and the Brewers Winds are out to center at 13 miles per hour That is a bump down to pitchers and a bump up to batters in that gate Also, there is a chance of rain in course field for the Rockies and the Marlins It's also just 57 degrees with winds in from center. So Take regular course down rated a couple of pegs for the batter still very good because it's the park You know the the outfield stays big no matter how cold it may be. I Do think they'll be able to play the game despite the rain, but just keep in mind that It is not full-on Coors field for today still probably a spot will want to stack Well, she'll talk about in just one second But first a quick reminder to make sure you are subscribed to the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed for not just the solo shop But also our PGA DFS podcast every week day or every week. I've got that solo today Brandon is on vacation. So all of that coming up later on today on the feed We also have a NASCAR podcast every week USC as well The Austin Swain all those podcasts in the same place if you hit subscribe We'll get them right as they go up and maximize your time to research after you listen Decide what you agree with what you do not and go from there So just first for the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed wherever you get your podcast Also, the NBA finals are about to heat up You can make every game feel like game seven on Fandall sports book an official partner of the NBA Throughout the playoffs all customers can place a no sweat same game parlay each week You will get up to $20 in free bets if you don't win Fandall has so many ways to play and best of all when you do win You'll get paid faster than a fast break either way You'll get up to $20 in free bets if your same game parlay during the playoffs does not win Fandall sportsbook an official partner of the NBA must be 21 plus in select states refund issued as non Withthrable free bets that expire seven days after a seat max free bet $20 per week Restricted supply see terms at sportsbook.fandall.com gambling problem call 1 800 gambler There's a fandall.com slash rg in Arizona call 1 800 next step or tax next step to 5 3 3 4 2 in Connecticut 1 8 8 8 7 8 9 7 7 7 7 or visit ccpg.org slash chat in Indiana 1 809 with it in Louisiana 1 8 7 7 7 7 7 0 stop in New York 1 8 7 7 8 Hope and why in Tennessee call the red line at 1 8 8 9 9 7 8 9 in Wyoming 1 800 5 2 2 4700 or in West Virginia 1 800 gambler dot net pitching preview for this Tuesday main slate We do have Eric Lauer, but he's at that rakely field game with the winds blowing out He is ten thousand six hundred dollars the highest salary pitcher on Fandall Kevin Gosman is 10 to facing off with Lucas Geolito who is ten thousand dollars Julio Arias is ninety eight hundred dollars Martín Perez all the way up to ninety seven Frankie Montas against the Astros ninety two then Adam Wayne right Christian Javier No, it's in the guard Michael Walker and Justin Steele also at rakely field are the others at eight thousand dollars or higher And like I said, it's a tough spot because of those top guys Gosman Geolito Montas and Lauer to an extent are the guys you feel best off my strikeout perspective, but they're all guys in really tough spots So that's a difficult situation for Gosman the matchup is different because it's a low strikeout matchup he's facing the White Sox and They're just 20% against righties But I think the rest of it the non a strikeout Depart of this is enough to put Gosman at the top of the slate for tonight The White Sox are not hitting for power against righties right now Their active roster has a 114 ISO against righties once you account for Tim Anderson's injury So it's a pretty decent spot actually. I know it does sound tough and it is tough, but It's mostly tough for DFS due to the low strikeout nature of the White Sox versus everything else Gosman is not pitching as well now as he was to start this year and it's likely because He's throwing fewer sliders. It's a pitch that generates a lot of whiz for him But it also lets up a lot of hard contact Gosman is scaled back on that pitch for his past five starts and the strikeouts are down But so is the hard contact. He's letting up just a 31% hard hit rate in that five-star sample The strikeout rate is down, but it's still fine at 27% and he has a 14.9% swinging strike rate So you could say that That strikeout rate may rebound as the sample expands Three of those starts for Gosman are on the road one of those home games One of the two was against the Astros. It's a really tough spot, but Gosman had 10 strikeouts there So I do downgrade him for DFS with his slide usage down I do downgrade him because of the low strikeout matchup But the rest of the profile is still great so I will have Gosman at the top of my list tonight despite a what I would say is a meh matchup against the White Sox here for the second pitcher, I'm gonna go Christian Javier and That to me is a bit counter to what I usually do because I typically downgrade Houston pitchers on the road It's a good pick park for strikeouts that can juice up their numbers and Javier is on the road tonight But I'm still gonna be hiding in large part because he's one of the few high strikeout guys tonight Who's in a good spot? He's facing the ace. They have an 82 WRC plus against righties and their current active roster They're ISO just 113 23% strikeout rate and they don't walk that much Which should help Javier Get good bang for his buck out of the batters he faces for tonight And we've seen Javier be fully stretched out now too because he went 96 pitches his most recent time out that is his second straight start topping 90 pitches and Even with the increased length Javier has still been getting strikeouts He's actually been increasing those somehow despite the increased length He has a 17.6% swinging strike rate in two consecutive games And then Mark is 14% in his games with this pitch count being up So it's still very high even as the pitch count has gone up He's still getting whiffs and that's translated to a 32% strikeout rate If I project Javier at 92 pitches for tonight, I got him at 7.1 strikeouts That's a pretty good number and actually ranked second on the slate behind just Geolito And his matchup is better than what Geolito has to so I do downgrade Javier for being on the road But even with that he is one of the few aces on this slate who is in a good matchup for DFS So I still think Javier Should be our number two pitcher for tonight behind Gosmin because of the matchup because of how good he's been pitching I think that's enough to make put Javier number two for tonight Now Javier is a value play here He's $8,700 which means the board is open for our third pitcher on the slate and to me It does come down to Geolito and Frankie Montas both those guys are in rough matchups Geolito is facing the Jays Montas is against the Astros I am gonna give the edge to Montas here by just a bit and the Astros are tough to be sure And I got burned by using a pitcher against them just a few weeks ago But I think Montas is good enough to still be in play despite this spot We're up to ten starts on Montas this year He has a 2.97 skill interactive eray with a 29 strikeout rate His fly ball rate allowed is 33 and those are great numbers all around It has led to some huge spike individual games Montas has double digit strikeouts in two of the past three games in the one game He did not get there He left because of a hand injury in the second inning But one of those games the big games came against the angels and they're the best team in the league in WRC plus against righties the Astros ranked 9th So they're very good, but not quite the angels the angels do strike out a lot more than the Astros So it's not a straight comparison not a one-to-one spot here, but Montas has shown He can shut down super tough competition That game was at home as was the Rangers game, but he's there tonight too The Astros had not seen Montas yet this year. So there are no familiarity issues here So I like it despite the issues It would be one thing if Montas were projecting to be the chalk pitcher for tonight I don't think that'll be the case. You know if he were chalk, you'd be able to avoid him But I don't think that'll be the case here against such a good team I've got Montas projected for seven strikeouts tonight. Again, that ranks third behind gilito and Javier That's good enough for me. So I'll be high on him and hope that others will not so I didn't go overall that game A's and Astros really good spot for pitching for DFS It is a bit warmer in Oakland today than usual, but still to 67 degrees. So not a spot We have to avoid but just worth noting that the temperature there is up a bit, but I think to me it's gosman one Javier to Montas number three Gilito for we'll talk about him in things to watch later on before that though Let's talk about the stacks and I mentioned that Coors field is not full Coors field But I think there's still enough there to like the Rockies for tonight I don't want to stack the marlins against serma marquez given the I mean, they've been playing pretty poorly offensively, but also I just think that it's a Not a good enough situation in terms of the weather to justify stacking against marquez But against with the Rockies facing edward cabrera. I could do that for sure now cabrera Not officially announced the starter yet for the marlins But craig mesh of sports grid has said that cabrera will likely be the starter So I trust craig I'll go based on his word and outline what I would do here assuming cabrera is the starter Cabrera did struggle in a short stint last year in the majors. He had a 5.31 skill interactive era mostly due to a ton of walks It doesn't seem like he sticks that issue yet because he's made five starts in triple a His walk rate there is 12 and that's led to a 4.56 era Despite a very good strikeout rate And we saw this with cabrera last year too where he had a 37 strikeout rate in triple a when he got promoted That did down to 23 percent in the majors his strikeout rate in triple a this year 32 percent So actually down from where I was last year his swinging strike rate is down as well And he did struggle with hard contact last year too a 48 hard hit rate allowed So I would expect cabrera to get some ground balls And we do want more balls in play than what he allows the walk rate can be kind of annoying because it suppresses balls in play But it's coarse field and I'm more willing to Stack in perfect situation than that spot and I'm okay with that here So the Rockies will be firmly in play At home for me for tonight Of the guys high in the order for the Rockies yonathan daza will probably be the lowest priority for me I can't say I won't use him because it is coarse field, but Doesn't have the best upside he's had he had entering last night zero extra base hits against righties this entire year He had to pinch it double last night against righty. So that stat is no longer true But one extra base hit still no stolen bases I will likely use him because it's coarse field me is very low salary, but You know, even if we get like sin hilliard lower in the order I prefer prioritize him over daza despite the fact that daza will be betting second hilliard probably sixth or seventh If he plays Garrett hampton if he plays I'd consider above daza as well some power some stolen base upside again daza Digest hit for an extra base hit last night against a righty. So maybe this will Wide the book and stupid and I will use him But he will be lower on my prioritization list than a lot of the other Rockies in this spot As far as the second second stack goes this one is good for weather because it is 95 degrees in Arizona And they're going to keep the roof open for today. So we want to stack here I think we can do so with the brakes the facing of bertha casayanos Who I've been stacking against for a while now and I keep thinking that it's not going to work Because he does some things pretty well But the results have been poor for a while now and he's facing the braves tonight So I think we should stack the braves here casayanos just really struggles to get strikeouts He has a 16 strikeout right this year and I think he knows that because He's been starting to throw more sliders across his past four starts for him It's a it's a low whiff pitch despite the fact typically it's more of a high whiff pitch, but I think that You know, we might see this this strikeout number continue to be low despite leaning on what in theory should be a higher strikeout pitch The strikeout rate for casayanos in this four-star sample is 17 percent It's coming with a 41 fly ball rates with a 39 heart rate The results this one against him too. He let up six runs the Dodgers last time out He's let up six home runs across those four starts. He's now facing the braves He'll be a 40 fly ball right against right. It's a great environment for heading for tonight. So The braves to me Very much a priority stack given all the factors lining up for them And I think that's a good spot to start buying into matt olson His salary just 34 to dollars But he saw as a 207 iso against righties the strikeout rate Manageable just hasn't been lost in the ball as much But his launch angle is 14 degrees across the past two weeks versus 10 degrees for the full season So he is still putting it on the ground more than I'd like But I think he's trending the right way So I'd expect the dingers to come eventually. He's only got I think five so far this year But I think that it's a good time to get in on olson now While the salary is doable at 34. I think to me It's a good time to buy so to me matt olson really good option for dfs for tonighting and good option going forward in decent spots Just because I'd expect the power to increase as we get further into the year There are a couple of other spots where we don't know the starter yet and I'll touch on those and things to watch But among the spots we do know the situation. I think the mats need to be an extra stacking They're facing patrick orbit who is still really struggling though There have been some more bright spots recently He's been going to more Sinkers and fewer four steamers of late and that's helped this fly ball rate go down to 30 percent across his past six starts That's calmed things down for him. He did hold this same mats team Scoreless across five innings in one of those starts But the broader sample and the peripherals are still concerning because in that time that's six start sample the era for Corbin is 4.46 He's let up five earned runs and two of those starts you let up three and two other starts He let up three home runs in one of the two one of the starts and they'll have two and another And that's because he's still letting up a lot of hard contact. So he's getting ground balls But the hard contact is still there. So when they do lock the ball It's going pretty far. His hard hit rate is 50 percent in that time And the strikeout rate is still to 17 percent. So it's getting better for Corbin But it's still definitely not great. I think the Mets are good enough to take advantage of that And it's super hot in new york for today, which which bumps up batters for sure So I think it's enough to make the Mets a really good stack here I talked a couple weeks ago about how I was pretty much out on Eduardo Escobar He was really struggling and that's not been as true against lefties as varieties because this is against lefties Is 250 small sample but a lot of fly balls as you've come to expect from Escobar He's been getting a couple more barrels the past two weeks. He's 24 to dollars I'll be in on Escobar here I think that's worth highlighting because I've been lower on him so far this year But I think in this spot against the lefty who's really struggling I will buy back into Eduardo Escobar for tonight. Let's move now to things to watch I do think Geolito deserves to be in your player pool I don't always get to four pitches in my player pool, but I think I will for tonight Geolito has a 33% strikeout rate this year It has mentioned that's tops on the slate for me his strikeout his strikeout projection But he lets up a lot of hard contact the Jays can be feisty in that arena Geolito's on the road and those downsides are enough to put him forth on my list but I think I will get to four here so Geolito to me Is fourth and I don't typically get to four pitchers But I think I will for tonight just because I think all four have a really good shot to be the number one pitcher for tonight The two spots where we don't know the starters yet are the Orioles and the Pirates The Orioles are facing the Mariners. I'm guessing it'll be a bullpen game Definitely not a bullpen. We need to avoid They do have two lefties in the bullpen and Keegan Aiken and uh, cnl Perez Aiken is on two days refs after he threw 46 pitches. So Probably available but but not definitively So I try to look for guys who can hit both lefties and righties If you decide to stack the mariners here and I'm okay with them for sure But just try to get guys who are good against both lefties and righties Finally, I bet the Dodgers are facing Mitch Keller potentially after an opener for the pirates Keller's been better than his results this year But he's still a low strikeout guy not enough fly balls not a ton of hard contact Or he's letting up enough fly balls for us to stack against him and enough hard contact But Keller's specifically doing a good job against lefties the numbers against righties are not as impressive So I'd bump up the righties if you go to the Dodgers here And would feel pretty good about them assuming that Keller is the starter for today But check back on starters to the Orioles and for the pirates to see if it is indeed a bullpen game and Keller For the pirates let's finish up here with our dinger calls And it's a couple of guys we've touched on during the stacking section for the boring one Matt Olson, I think that again the homers will come starting to get more loft in the ball recently Still hitting for some power really good spot for hitting for tonight with the temperature what it is So Matt Olson the boring home run call the fun one I will go Eduardo Escobar big fly ball guy playing in a park that is also super hot for tonight We want to target warm weather for batting We get that with both Olson and Escobar. So to me home run calls for tonight Matt Olson and Eduardo Escobar That is all that we have here for today on the solo shop But as I mentioned, we are back once again later on today to preview this week's pga tournament It is the memorial tournament. We'll break down My favorite golfers in each salary tier and get you set for that one over on fan duel.com Get that by subscribing to the number fire daily fantasy podcast So you wherever you get your podcast and if you like what you hear leave us a rating and review as well If you've got any questions for me I am on twitter at jim sonnis j i m s a n n e s You can also follow the fan duel podcast network at fan duel podcast big Thank you to everyone for tuning in for today. Good luck to you with your mlb dfs armets I hope you all had fantastic weekends. We'll talk to you once again tomorrow to break down wednesday's sleep This has been the solo shot right here on the fan duel podcast network


He has 12 years in information security experience but he still considers himself a social engineer nude. I'm going to quote him on this. He enjoys all aspects of info security but enjoys creeping on people and infrastructure using OSINT the most. And he's kind of a, even though he's kind of creepy, he has been accused of having a man crush on the human hacker. Okay. Notice that's accused, isn't it? Yes. This talk is not sponsored by his organization and if it was, he may be unemployed after giving it. So let's give him our attention. The theme is Beyond Fishing, Building and Sustaining a Corporate SE Program. Thank you Defcon, SE Village. Thanks Chris and Michelle for this opportunity. I'm a cybersecurity manager at some financial services company. If you Google me, it'd be pretty easy to find. I've managed an ethical hacking team, vulnerability management team, and I have a social engineering team and they're here today. And if you have any questions about this talk, email me or you can follow me on Twitter. But I have an announcement to make. I'm a recovery for social, I've been addicted to social engineering for a long time and I'm in a recovery program for it. But I wasn't always addicted. In fact, I really didn't believe in social engineering about four or five years ago. I used to go to Defcon over when I was in Rio, see the social engineering village come in, take a seat, take a look at people in this smelly box. I stayed there for a couple minutes and I'd leave because I really didn't believe in it and I've managed to ethical hacking team at the time. And then things changed. You see, one day I came to work and my boss said, we want you to fish to people. And I'm like, why would I want to do that? You want me to do what? Fish to people, that's no fun. You know, I was into web applications, thick clients and things of that nature. I did not want to fish to people and no one on my team wanted to do that as well. So, how hard could it be? You put the fish together, send an email out and I did that and it was a disaster. We interrupt operations, the help desk was flooded with calls, the mail team was flooded with calls and the incident response team was flooded with calls. So I started thinking, I got a chance to redeem myself and I had to find a way to answer this question of fishing and organization. So I do what we all do when we have problems, we go to Google. And when I searched Google, I ran on the social-engineer.org website. Why? That's the same website of the team that manages to SE Village. So I went there and I listened to all the podcasts that were there. And I listened to Chris go through puberty in the podcast from number one to podcast 60. I'm just saying Chris, your voice did get deeper as you know, you moved on. And then I listened to podcast 44 because that's when the country Asian first started. I listened to that podcast about three or four times. Yeah, I'm a little creepy. Three or four. And I read all the SE books and then I created a methodology. One of the things in this methodology that I created was to communicate, was to tell the people, okay? And I did that and I had some success. Now, people still failed but I did not interrupt the organization's operations at the time.  And they usually complain because you know they're going to end up with findings. But when you test the people and you let them know that it's coming, they're like, oh, okay. And I did that. But see, it comes with a cost. You see that chart at the bottom down there with the line going down. That's not the click rate. That's your popularity. You see, you will not be popular if you're fishing the entire organization continuously. So, started thinking, is this really a career? Do really people get, I mean, do people really get paid for this besides Chris and Michelle? What about the other three deadly social engineering sins, such as USB smishing and fishing? Well, did a Google search and it seems that engineering is in good company. It was listed as one of the top six well-paying jobs of 2014. Right between bond disposal diver and power line helicopter pilot. And it was still right behind the elusive ethical hacker. But where are the jobs really today? You see, I did a search on the Google. Do a little Google dorking. And you see, indeed.com has 8,442 jobs. That's enough for us all. Right? Well, indeed, simply hired had 150 and zip recruiter had one. You see, those aren't real jobs. Those are fake jobs. Kind of like fake news. In fact, what they do is they take any hit against social and list it as a job. So it can be a social worker. It can be someone doing something with social media. And it's listed as a social engineering job. But let's take a closer look at that zip recruiter job. So, this job has benefits, which, you know, we all need benefits.  Now, who in here would really qualify for that job? No, you wouldn't. It's been four years. One. And you know what? That job is filled. That probably is who applied for it. The job is filled as of July 19th. And don't ask how I know. As was brought out earlier, we all know that the need for social engineering continues. Recently, in the IBM Cyber Security Threat Intelligence Index, 95 percent of all data breaches involved some form of social engineering. In fact, it continues to impact us as people. The U.S. elections. Good old John Podesta getting a fishing email through the DNC. And recently they started to state that the French elections were impacted by social engineering as well. USBs haven't been out of the news. Just last year, there was a study by the University of Illinois that stated about 95 percent of all students would plug in USB drives. And IBM recently shipped USB drives to its customers with malware. And when it comes to fishing, we don't need to go any further than our old family. Yes, your grandparents. Go and ask your grandparents if they've received a vision call, whether from the IRS or the scam that was going around asking if, you know, can you hear me now? And they say yes. And they get signed up for some type of service. They get something in the mail. So the need is still there, whether it's for corporate America, the need for training is still there, whether it's for corporate America or whether it's for us. But let's take a look at the millennials. This is the largest group as of 2015 that's employed in your corporation. They make up of over half of all new hires. This group is the most technologically advanced group ever. They literally grew up with the Internet and they literally grew up with phones in their hands. This group prefers texting over phone calls. And in fact, most of them over 68% admit to texting a lot. Email for them is secondary. But even with this, overall email use continues to rise. So that goes to show you that fishing and smithing will be a vector for this generation that's coming in. I had a chance to do my own survey against millennials and I had some pretty interesting results. 55% claim to know about social engineering. So that's pretty good. You can tell by the audience, by the size of the audience here. But 96% claim to have been phished or received an unsolicited phone call or text message within the last six months. 82% never heard of smithing. 90% never heard of phishing. And only 79% would say that they were not plugging a file in the USB drive or a mobile device. But this arrogant group, 50% of them claim they know how to handle all of the above even though they never heard of two of them. Doing research on some of the data that I have access to, I see a bunch of them still fail phishing attempts. In fact, they fail more than us so-called old folks. Some more research shows that they have poor hygiene as far as security. There was a recent study that showed that of people who reused their e-mail of the total population that reused their, I'm sorry, they reused their passwords. Of the total populace, 92% were millennials. In fact, another study showed that even though they're more comfortable using technology than their elders, that security doesn't flow down into the organization. So this is your organization, right? So how do you move beyond phishing to move to the next three daily sins, smishing USB access, malicious media or phishing? In my experience, I've had to deal with what I call the big three. HR, legal, and people in the politics. So let's start with HR. We know their job. Their role is to help protect the people. They do payroll sometimes. They do benefits and they hire people and they probably regret hiring me. But you want to make sure it's your friends with this group. You want to make sure you build a strong relationship with them, especially if you look to move past phishing. You don't want to do anything hypothetical like sending a payroll phishing e-mail at the end of the month, which impacted payroll and your paycheck was messed up a little bit. And you also want to make sure that your friends are legal. They do the right thing. They do all their lawyer stuff. I don't know much about law. But you want to make sure you understand what the operational impact of sending a phishing e-mail or moving beyond that is. For instance, on a Friday night, you don't want to send any legal related document because they are obligated to stay there. And some poor clerk may be there responding to a phishing e-mail unknowingly. And not that any of this has happened.  You see, I have listed Dr. Paul X-Men's Seven Emotions. There's anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise, and contempt. Now, you think about the size of your organization. You think about all of this is always constantly going on, that all these emotions are changing, all these triggers are happening at any moment of the day. And when you start to want to move past phishing and they get wind of it, you know, it may be a problem. I can tell you that I've dealt with anger, disgust, and contempt the most out of all of these seven. And as you look to move forward with this, you may deal with these as well. So how do you tame that? How do you deal with the big three?  You got to do the boring stuff. You got to go look at your organizational policies and standards. Because that's the only way that you'll be able to make sure that your programs line up with what the organization says. How are you supposed to handle a suspicious phone call? How are you supposed to handle a unsolicited text message on your phone? Also, you want to add more meat by looking at the threat, by using real-time threat intelligence. You want to look at any threats that happen against your organization and any threats that happen against your industry or your stack. And also, you want to read any breach reports you can. Because that will help give you food as you move forward to introducing these new programs or new steps in your program. And most importantly, you want to create a methodology. You see, how are you going to handle USB drives across multiple organizations, multiple areas? How are you going to prepare them? And how are you going to destroy them? Because there's no way that you send them a... Even if a USB drive was brought back, there's no way you should send that back out in the field. The other thing was smishing. As we look into BYOD devices, you run into legal issues about leaving artifacts on there if you decide to drop payload and also the information that you pulled back on those devices. And then, vishing, pretexting. This is new language for them. They're not going to understand what a pretext is, so you're going to have to explain it. And also, you're going to have to explain what the target should be and what the success rate is. If someone receives a vision phone call, what are they supposed to do? You want to review your local privacy laws, just like they've done here in Nevada. And you also want to explain how often you're going to do big three. And you also want to sustain your program. You're going to want to do data analysis. You want to get all the data that you can from your fishing and smishing results. You want information like their age and their gender and their language and department of job roles. Getting this information will help you understand what the attack surface looks like in your organization when it comes to people. You'll be able to work with training and awareness and have them target their training towards certain things. And you'll be able to get all the data that you receive from smishing and from fishing includes system and device patch information. You can use that to share with the vulnerability management team to help understand gaps in your environment for patching. And another thing you want to do, get real incidents. Work with the IR team. Find out the people who get real fishing emails. And check to see what the test results are for them in those fishing applications. You can also get training awareness and use that to help get specialized training. And again, continue that line of communication with the big three and continue that moving on. And overall, you want that to help improve your overall program. And also you want to get creative. You know, the organization gets tired or gets used to seeing just your normal fluorescent USB drives with something written across it. You know, you got a comic books or comic characters, things of that nature. And in your organization, people may be starving for hardware. Use mice. And I'm not saying you have to program the USB drives, but just use generic USB drives next to a mouse. You will be surprised what people plug in. Even if your organizational policy states that they're not supposed to plug in USB drives, they still plug in a bunch of other things. And if you don't believe me, get access to your scene logs. Also try to boil the ocean. Get access to open source tools. Use the social engineering tool kit. Use Kingfisher. And just recently, we started looking at the smartphone pentest framework from Georgia Weedman. Other factors that may impact you as you want to move beyond phishing? The size of your organization. This may not work if it's about 100 people inside your organization. And you also want to make sure you get your executive and leadership buy-in. My organization is fortunate to have that. To have our leaders believe in all four aspects of social engineering. And your budget. Again, when it comes to USB drives, not everybody can afford to get 200 rubber duckies, so you have to get creative. You may have to write batch files or scripts on those drives. And last but not least, your company culture. That plays a big part, because again, as you go against the third legged at big three, that can be quite challenging to get past. You can't get through any of them. Don't try to boil the ocean as the last speaker said. Choose just one. Maybe it's just missing, or maybe it's just phishing, depending on if your organization has a large customer service base, or a large mobile workforce. So the goal is to reduce the impact from all social engineering attacks. Most organizations are doing phishing today. We want to push past phishing. And one of the ways to do that is create a methodology. We have to communicate with other parts of the organization as we move past phishing. And we also want to do continuous testing. Frequency depends up on your culture. And also you want to take all your findings and make sure that you can get that tied into social engineering awareness training programs. So in conclusion, if you're phishing and you're trying to move past those other, move past that and get to the other three, other four, don't give up. It's taken me about four years to get to this point. And also, there's a real need for more social engineering jobs, not just fake ones out there on the web. So hopefully in the future, one day when you do a job search for social engineer, you'll find about 200 plus jobs. Thanks. Any questions? I think that SaaS services play a part. And I've especially when you do a large scale phishing. But there are a lot of things that you can do. Each tool has its particular place, but I still prefer to use open source tools for certain techniques and attacks. There's one in the back. Yes, I do. That saying that it is a threat, right?  That still continues to be a threat. In fact, I think the IRS has a training program now that you can take for phishing. You know, we still have phishing attacks and submission attacks that happen, and especially not only against us personally, but against us in corporations. But yeah, phishing will still be number one for a while, such as Slack. Think about that one. So the question is, what about other channels such as Slack? That is a good attack vector, and I'll have to do some more research on that, but that's good. Using Slack and other methods of communication. Any more questions? I'm sorry. Hey, Helen. That's a good question. Which of the four have the least amount of coverage? I would say most people know about phishing, and they know about phishing. They know of it or they've experienced it. And you hear more people start talking about USB attacks, and the last would be submission. They don't know what a smidge is, basically a spear phishing against a phone, and they don't know how to respond to that. No, thank you. So how do we handle the limitations of the team size and getting used to the voice? I'm in a large organization, so I do a lot of training awareness, so I don't do any of the calls. But our teams, they're pretty good. So the question is, have we ever brought in a third party, or had a third part assessment, people fail, or victimize, and their feelings? Yes. So that's one of the downsides of kind of doing this, is that you hear a lot of complaints, and we have mailboxes or social networking groups set up for people to express themselves. And in fact, on one of the slides I was going to mention that I think we've received maybe less than five to ten people who've actually sent emails saying thank you. Most of them are you know, why are you doing this, I don't have time for it in my day, this is my job, I don't care, things of that nature. So one of the things that we do is I try to give real attacks. I try to get incidents that come across from incident response, and say here, so you don't care about clicking an email, this is a real attack that came up against this person and the impact would have been X. And that's one thing that I find helps out a lot, real attacks. Using can examples from a SAS tool doesn't work, but when you show real examples of a CEO who was attacked or just a phishing attack against someone within the organization that turns the lights on. So I believe that people should have the ability to express themselves, but at the same time they need to understand why we're doing this. So again, communicating, I like real world information, I like using real world attacks to show them the need. I think it's a little bit of both. So when you read some of the reviews that we received back, it is some point to training, you know, I haven't had enough training or we haven't had XMOM training, or it may be I was in the middle of something and I clicked the link because X, you know, and this was unfair because my day's busy. So it's a little bit of both. Good one. So return of investment when you have a we use open source tools that keep down the cost, right, trying to disperse a boatload of USB drives on a on a frequent basis. I can't say how many you use you use cheap drives, you know, like I couldn't afford to use rubber duckies all the time, right, because of cost. But the return of investment on the overall program itself. So for me, I really don't have to worry about the click rate going down. I'm not judged by that. That's another department which is great. But on the other hand, you want to define what your success factor is. And that success factor is really defined by what a user does when they receive a suspicious email or call. Did they follow the right thing? Did they do the right thing which is either or they didn't report it. So when you look at real world tax I can use this. So the the attack against the DNC I believe had a spearfishing email that was targeted toward cybersecurity actually, right. When you look at attacks like that and you look at the operational impact. So generally in most organizations finance, HR, payroll those are pretty much your high value organizations and of course you have your executive levels and things of that nature. So when we target those groups we want to communicate with someone that's in there, in that area. You want to have someone that's in there that champions you and understands what's going on. So when you do send that off you want to communicate basically. So there's not mass panic with one of those types of scenarios go off. So how do you address someone that doesn't care? That's a good question because they came up last week in the conversation that I had. How do you know that someone doesn't care? How do you know if someone fails 12 times a year and they just consistently fail how do you know that that's egregious? So one of the thoughts that I had was if you want people to do the right thing no matter if they fail or not you want them to report. Is this person doing the right thing or are they just failing on purpose? And I think that's probably the only thing that I can really think of. Are they following the proper process for a fail within the organization? So if they're in power and they continues to fail the cameras still aren't right. There is another group that's responsible for training executives at my organization I told you I might be unemployed after this. There were three tools I had listed. One was the WSET, social engineering toolkit. The other was Kingfisher. And the last one was the smart phone framework by Georgia Weidman. I got two minutes. What do we do to stop vision calls? Because do not call this does not work. That's a good one. FTC. Let it go to voicemail. One of the problems is that a lot of times these guys are using VoIP. You block that number and it's going to pop up like a whack-a-mole. So I think the most important thing is to try to document where those numbers are coming from. Communicate to people on what actions to take. At this point with all of the options out there to spoof phone numbers, it's really hard to say that I'm going to block numbers from this certain range. But FTC, that's the start. That's it. Thank you. One more question. We're going to try to sum this up. Users who have elevated access who don't care. Right? Well, actually users who have elevated access our organization do treat them a little differently. I shouldn't be saying that. But when you have someone that has elevated privilege they should be treated differently as far as training and awareness and also they should be held to a higher standard. If you have admin access and you fail continuously you're putting the organization at risk a little bit more than someone that's a customer service on a box with less access. Again, that's my opinion. Not the organization. I'm getting pushed out of here. Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.


Hmm. Man, it's an interesting time in the world. We've got people riding on their skateboards with the Vision Pro or having Chinese buffet like Canoopsie with the Vision Pro itself. And honestly, Canoopsie, really? Did it taste that good with the Vision Pro? Anyway, besides that.  But the main question here is, which device would you pick or rather yet, which is actually better? Is it the $3,500 Vision Pro? Or is it the $500 Quest 3? That is what I'm here to help you decide. So let's start off with the very first aspect of both devices, the hardware. Now, Apple has designed something that is truly unique. My, besides the fact that it looks like a pair of ski goggles, it's got a really nice build. And I think they spent a good amount of time with the hardware. Think about it. You've got an M2 chip built in, R1 chip built in. Those are expensive processors. Design-wise, there are a ton of cameras. I mean, the fact that it does eye-tracking, really impressive. You also have a scanner there to scan to unlock your device. You've got cameras outside for the pension zoom. There's a lot of components to make this device worth it. Then the build itself, premium materials, you've got magnetic latches for different things. You've got also the loop design, which we'll get to when it comes to comfort, dual loop and single loop. So hardware is great. You've got speakers as well for spatial audio, but the battery's outside. This is the most on Apple thing ever, seriously. Because first of all, actually maybe not, because this is a 3166 milliamp battery. That is external. This is a battery that charges for USB type C, but it's connected by a giant lightning cable. Go figure, right? So which means you're thinking, oh, I can dual swap it. Nah, you can't, because there's no built-in battery here. So which means you either have to charge it with another battery pack or connected or you just have to stop wherever you are. So that's the design element here. And you can see how good it looks, but also how different and maybe unwise it might be. Now, the Quest 3. Honestly, it looks like a toy. Not as bad as the Quest 2, but it feels more like a gaming device or something that you would use to play. You've got plastic build. You've got the cameras in front, a USB on the side, running the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chipset. Pretty nice. And then you've got the straps. Very different from what Apple has. We'll get to into that in comfort. But the other thing about these two devices is their displays. Meta says they have equivalent of 4K+, and then Apple says it's better than the 4K TV. I mean, there's some actual numbers here and there, but I'll tell you this. Yes, the Vision Pro is much clearer and sharper than the Quest. It's just what it is. And you guys will see it when I actually do the recordings. Now, on design elements, yes. Vision Pro wins. It's a well-built device. It's solid, it's premium. But when it comes to design aesthetics for usability, I give that to the Quest. And you're saying, hey, Thundie, you're picking and choosing. That's life. That's literally what it is. Now, let's talk about comfort. This is the main part of using a VR AR headset. Ideally, I would love to use a headset like my Meta Ray Bands, and that would do everything for me. Or even something like the X-Rail glasses, which I've used a couple of occasions. And honestly, that was my perfect use scenario. But still, we've got the Vision Pro. And the Vision Pro has a couple of things for that comfort that bear into mind. One, that I haven't talked about much, that doesn't bother me, but just annoys me. It's just that you have a cable running. You have to be mindful of that.  Then you also have the loops. Apple, when you get the device, it comes with a single loop band. Very easy to swap out. If you pull a tab, that's it. Done. It's nice. It's aesthetically beautiful. But it's not comfortable. It definitely is not comfortable. I mean, the first five minutes of use, actually, honestly, the first two minutes of use, I was, it was painful. I would say I could use it for about 30 minutes if I really wanted to push it, but that's about it. Now the dual loop band, much more comfortable, but I still think it has a side effect because the overhead band goes across from, say, your left ear to your right ear, rather from the front of the headset to the back, which will alleviate more of that facial tension, which is what you get with the Apple Vision Pro. On the other hand, we've got good old trusty, typical standard VR headbands. And what I like about this is that the headband goes from the front to the back, and then it also splits to the back so it reduces the surface area that there's a lot of tension in it. It's a much more comfortable headband to wear, like so. Easy to put on, very simple, feels really comfortable. Well, of course, the Vision Pro with the dual loop can't wear it and use it, but it's not as comfortable. And I think that is a big thing. Now I know I have some friends who say, the bands work well, the single loop works well for them. It's fine, but when it comes to comfort for something you may be using for at least two hours with your Vision Pro battery, you want to be comfortable. And I think the quest just simply wins in that category. Software, this is where Apple usually excels and does a lot of great things in. And let's go in and take a quick look. With the Vision Pro, when you put it on, it lights up, scans your eyes, gets you in, tells you to align the headset, move it up, yes, I'm in. And then you see this very interesting landscape where you can actually have depth distance. So because of the depth sensor, I know that the distance between my eye and where everything is is roughly around six feet. I love that, it's really nice.  So you've got something very familiar with the Apple apps and also feels like an iPad app gallery. And I think that comfort is really nice because it's very natural, at least for a lot of people. The Apple ecosystem does a really good job at giving you something that makes you feel like, I know where it is, I've seen an iPhone, I've seen an iPad and that ease of use is great. Plus the pinching and moving around is nice. So if I open up an application, I can really look at it and then move it around. Very smooth software and I think that works really well. On the side note though, the screen is probably just all greasy right now because my hand's all over it. Then software-wise, we have the Quest. We jump into the Quest and we have something that is simple but also familiar and also dated if you will.  It feels very traditional and there's nothing wrong with that but it doesn't add you to a future scape. Now you also have pinch navigation if you will. It's more software-based because they don't have as much sensors but it works fairly well. The one thing I do like with the Quest though is compared to the Vision Pro is if you wanna go back, say to your home screen from any app, on the Vision Pro you do have to go ahead and tap on the crown or you look up and go to the control center.  That's a very simple experience there but it still feels dated. It doesn't feel as clean and what Apple has but it still functions really well. Now the software experiences of both of them have added features which I forgot to mention the first time I actually recorded this video. You have the ability to mirror your MacBook to your Vision Pro and use multiple screens and have that very giant experience there which is great. You can also do that on the Quest 3 as well with an app which you can download either your Mac or your PC and have that same giant experience. I think the Vision Pro is a little bit more robust just because it allows you to have multiple home screens while the Quest allows you to have one giant home screen and other applications running at the same time. But again, similar experiences giving you a very different look at what the software can bring for them. Vision Pro software cleaner but Quest I think is pretty solid plus you do have Instagram, you can go on Instagram on there and there's no Instagram on the Vision Pro yet, I know. Now speaking of applications that brings us to the kind of apps you find available. Now with the Vision Pro the Apple says there are 600 apps at launch and there's apps that make sure of the iPad apps as well as also Vision Pro apps as well. Now you're not gonna find every single application you're looking for just yet and I think to be fair I have to be patient it's only been three days so I should not complain. But in terms of apps that fully take advantage of the Vision Pro they're not a lot that do that yet. I think one of them is the extension experience which is fun and shows you what it can do with a dinosaur walking in, butterfly. You get the idea of like okay yes I can be in a virtual world, I can be in a mixed reality world at the same time. Then you go over to the Quest 3 which has a ton of apps. There's games and apps galore and they're like $29.99 each. They should be cheaper. I'm just saying it's a lot of money I spent on making this video besides buying the Vision Pro. That being said they're ton of apps and they're apps for every kind of scenario whether it's a virtual reality app, mixed reality app, whether it's things like Instagram or even you know Facebook, WhatsApp. Those are the kind of things that are built in, it's a very rich ecosystem for applications but we definitely know that Apple will get there.  So you get the idea of where they land and right now in terms of application the Quest has more apps for now. Gamers, you've been waiting for this section. It's finally here. How is the gaming experience? Now I have done a gaming video on the Vision Pro. Go check that out. But I wanted to see how they match at least for now. We know that the Vision Pro as I mentioned doesn't have as many apps right now but what can you experience on the Vision Pro? So there's some Vision Pro, it's specific gaming apps and I think the best one is still Synthrader. It's an app that's available both on the Vision Pro and the Quest 3 and it's an augmented reality app that it's basically a dance rhythm app and it's fun. You see me goofing around, put your steps in, you can learn how to dance with that too. Maybe a little bit but you get the full idea with this and I think that's just kind of the vision of where apps will grow from there. There's also an app called What the Golf? I really like it because you can walk around the golf course and see what you want to do, move the app around. It's fun. It's simple, it's fun and then you can jump into iPad apps like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. There is PUBG New State. I try to use it, it didn't work. I'm gonna try it again. So if it works, you'll see in this video if it doesn't, you're gonna see my face. So one of the two. But there are apps like that. Now it's not a lot. So what are the other options? Xbox Game Pass for instance. There's no app yet and traditionally you can use the browser but in this case because you cannot pin it to your home screen, you cannot use Xbox Game Pass. That's just what it is for now. So the only available option is Steam Link and Steam Link actually works well. Connect it to my PC upstairs and you're wondering, you know what, you can play on a TV. You've got 65 inch, 77 but I don't have a 200 inch display and that is what you get in this environment. You can go super large, playing Street Fighter, having a good time, enjoying the gameplay experience and I think that is something that's to be cherished. Not something you necessarily need but you definitely get the idea. And then we move over to the Quest III. Games galore. There are a ton of games everywhere. Games like Bullet Storm and also games like Creed that take you into VR environment. Some games taking you into AR environment like of course, Synth Raider. So whatever game you're looking for, you will find in terms of just the environments and feel. And I think that's what the Quest really brings to the team move. Because Oculus started as a gaming VR headset so you're gonna have that kind of pedigree there. Plus you do have the ability to connect to Xbox Game Pass which is also available. And you can do that in a virtual environment or a physical environment as well. So mixed reality as well as also Steam Link. So I can do the same thing, play my games there. And when it comes to gaming, it's just really clear. It's the Quest III. Right now the Vision Pro is not there yet but it will get there I think at some point. But I think the downside to that is that having physical buttons and controls adds much more of a tactile element to that gaming experience that you're just not gonna get on the Vision Pro unless you use an Xbox controller but that's not tactile. It's just you hitting buttons and that's pretty much it. So Quest III. Now this is the part of the video why I tell you yes you should buy the Vision Pro. It's $3,500, it doesn't matter. Life is good, taxes are low. But that's not really the case. And this is also the part of the video why I should say well you know what, save money. Buy the Quest III, $500, you can find it somewhere. Nah, that's not really the case either because I'm not gonna tell you any of those. I think what we need to really look at is where these devices stand and what they bring to the table. Start off with the Quest III. It's $500 which means at some point this year we'll get cheaper. And also at some point this year we'll get a Quest IV. But what the Quest III brings to the table is an experience where you can game and enter into a VR or AR world in a very smooth fashion that allows you to enjoy games differently. Whether it's in VR or AR or even just sitting down and playing an Xbox game. And the fact that it's compact and portable really adds to that element. So I think there's a lot of great things to see there. And then we look at the Vision Pro and we go, well it's $3,500 and there are not a lot of games. But we know it's Apple so there's gonna be games coming in. Well what's the difference to that experience? I think the best way to look at it is the way my wife explained it to me because I was even having a hard time myself. And I said, you know this is what he brings to the table, these are the specs, this is what he does. And she said, well you've got a M2 MacBook on your head. Which means you can do a lot with it. Now it's got better displays. It's really, really captivating. Especially when you turn on the scenes or the different landscapes, environments Apple has to call it. Basically you go into a virtual world that you can't walk around in yet. But when you turn it on and I like to go to the moon it really sets the stage for something different. And that brings the possibility. And right now with the Vision Pro there are tons of possibilities. Because of that M2 chip, because of that 4K display, because of spatial audio. When you move around your persona in a conversation I didn't even talk about that during FaceTime the sound moves around with you. And that is really cool. Now personas are also really weird. That doesn't look like me. I called my wife and she said, take that off I need my husband back. You get the idea. Danny looked like a character from Danny Suarez in PS2. Very bad. And some people look great. So it picks and chooses. But you get the idea that there's so much more this thing can do. And that's not discounting the Quest 3 because Quest 3 is doing a lot right now. And what this tells me is that we're at a time where input methods and computing are gonna change. Our cell phones are still gonna be there. Our laptops will be there. But this were advanced in an area where eventually hopefully I can put on just like my metal ray bands and I'm in that world. I have an AR environment or I have something that just looks like a pair of ski goggles like thin ones and I'm still in the environment I want to be in. But Apple has come in and Apple has now excited the industry. And that's just something that always happens with Apple. It means that metal will make a better device. It means that the Quest 4 might be so much more comparable at a cheaper price point for people who want that. And it also means that Apple will have to come back with something that's cheaper and still better. And then maybe Google comes back with Google Glass. I doubt it. But that possibility is there. We know that Microsoft has something which has been more commercial with a HoloLens. Maybe that gets better. Maybe Samsung does something like Galaxy View or what did Danny call it? Nevermind. You get the idea. You understand that this is going to change the industry and even though I made fun of everyone at the beginning of the video, walking around with Vision Pro everywhere, that's gonna be part of the norm moving forward. But better versions, hopefully better versions. So to end this video, who's better? Who wins? Well, that's up to your wallet, really. So let me know what you guys think. Do you think the Quest 3 is the better device here? Do you think the Vision Pro clearly is that device? Leave your thoughts down below. Enjoy the bloopers at the end because they're a ton. And always enjoy your entertainment. It's a very interesting number. All the people at home who are playing around with themselves, scratch that. Makes it easier for me to put it on. And oh, I just forgot this is Hayato's bed. I'll size it. God, my dishwasher. We have something that promises. I can see why some people will justify ooh, that $3,500 price point. To be fair, we have noise in the background. Maybe Microsoft does something. God dang it. Guys, it's cold outside. It's cold.  Let's start that again. Three, two, one, go.


Welcome to the presentation of the STM32-L4 Plus Direct Memory Access Controller, or DMA. It covers the main features of the DMA controller module, enhanced by the new DMA MUX module. The DMA controller embedded in STM32-L4 Plus is similar to the one implemented in the STM32-L4, but with an additional DMA MUX. The main feature of the DMA is to offload the CPU for data transfers from any memory mapped source towards any memory mapped destination. For more information about the memory mapping and specifically addressable space for each DMA controller, refer to the L4 Plus AHB Bus Interconnect. L4 Plus DMA features. Two DMA controllers. For each DMA controller, it is possible to do programmable block transfers with seven concurrent channels, each of which are independently configurable. Programmable channel-based priority, and data transfers via the AHB Masterport connected to the bus matrix. There is also a DMA request multiplexer, or DMA MUX, with programmable selection of the source of any DMA request, from a peripheral in DMA mode, or from a trigger. And event triggered and synchronized DMA request generation. There are 89 peripheral requests and four DMA MUX generated requests. There are 26 triggers and synchronization inputs, and among these 26, there are four DMA MUX generated events. There are 14 DMA channels and requests. Each channel of the DMA controller is independently configurable. A channel can be assigned to a DMA hardware request from a peripheral in peripheral to memory or memory to peripheral data transfers. Alternatively, a channel is assigned to a software request in memory to memory data transfers. A channel is programmed with a priority level, and a channel is programmed for a number of data transfers at a block level. The software can control a channel via the separated interrupts and or flags upon programmable events, such as a block transfer complete, and or a half block transfer complete, and or a transfer error. A channel is programmed for a number of data transfers at a block level with independent source and destination data size. Independent source and destination start address. Independent source and destination address increment, either contiguously incremented or at a fixed address, and a programmable amount of data to be transferred within a block. In memory to memory mode, a block transfer starts as soon as the channel is enabled. There is no hardware request. Whereas in peripheral to memory and memory to peripheral modes, a block transfer starts as soon as both the channel is enabled and the peripheral sends a DMA hardware request. A DMA hardware request identifies a single DMA data transfer. Each DMA hardware request is paced and granted by the DMA when each data is successfully transferred to the destination. In any mode, channels arbitration is reassessed between every data transfer. DMA MUX is a programmable multiplexer router of DMA requests. The mapping of DNA requests from any peripheral to DMA channels is programmable via independent DMA MUX channels. Additionally, up to four DMA requests may be internally generated by the DMA MUX following an input trigger signal. Any generated DMA request is independently programmable in terms of the trigger selection, the edge detection, and the number of generated DMA requests upon each trigger event. The trigger source may be EXTI0 to EXTI15 or LPTIMOUT, DSI tearing effect, DSI end of refresh, DMA2D end of transfer, LTDC line interrupt, or any of the four generated DMA MUX events. In synchronization mode, any DMA MUX output DMA request can be synchronized with respect to a programmed and selected synchronization input. The synchronization edge detection and the number of transmitted DMA requests upon the synchronizer event are also programmable. As well as managing DMA requests, DMA MUX can also generate programmable DMA MUX events, which may be looped back as trigger inputs. For example, this would apply to transfers chaining between different DMA channels. In normal or unsynchronized mode, SE equals 0, DMA MUX is routing one selected input DMA request to one of its output DMA requests. On top of that, DMA MUX may be configured for generating an event, EGE equals 1. An event is generated at every NBREQ plus 1 DMA requests. Here NBREQ equals 3. In synchronization mode, SE equals 1, DMA MUX is configured to synchronize a DMA or block transfer request upon the reception of each hardware synchronization event. The block data size is programmable via the program number of DMA input requests equal to NBREQ plus 1 to be transferred between two occurrences of the synchronization input. On top of that, DMA MUX can be enabled for generating an event every NBREQ plus 1 DMA requests. If there is a new synchronization occurrence before the block transfer has been completed, as paced and granted by the DMA, there is a DMA MUX synchronization overrun flag and a raised interrupt. Each DMA channel can notify software with an interrupt, being caused by any of the four possible events. Half block transfer completion, block transfer completion, transfer error or any of the three above events, also known as global. DMA MUX can generate one interrupt caused from an overrun by any of the configured channels. Root cause may be either a trigger overrun before the internally generated number of DMA requests have been issued and completed, and or a synchronization overrun before the number of DMA requests, external or internal requests have been issued and completed. This table summarizes the state of DMA versus the power state machine.


و أقول في القرآن ما جاءت به آياته فهو الكاريم المنزال و أقول قال الله جل جلاله والمصطف الهدي و لا أتأوله الحمد لله رب العالمين له الحمد الحسن والثناء الجميل و شدوا الله إله إلا الله وحده لا شريكنا يقول الحق وهو يهدي السبيل و أشدوا أن محمد العبد هو رسوله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وأصحابه والتابعين لهم بإحسان إلى يوم الدين أما بعد إن شاء الله تعالى في this contradiction I want to speak about التأثر بقراءة سيرة لاعب أو فنان The person gets affected by reading the biography of a football player or even an artist and he does not get affected by reading the biography of سيرة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم and reading the biography of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم doesn't get affected by it He might read it ample times many times it doesn't get affected by it but when he reads the story of a football player or a basketball player or a boxer it touches their heart and they talk about it I read this story of this particular football player or I read this biography or the autobiography of a particular boxer or sports figure and the person says my heart moved and I was touched by it then the seer of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم is read on that person or they read the prophet's biography and it doesn't have that much effect on them or little effect that is a contradiction why is it that the story of someone who is lower than the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم lower than him how is it possible that their biography and their life can touch you more than the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم is it not say you do well at the Adam is the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم not the best person to have ever walked this earth how is his life did not affect you did not really touch you a person whose purpose and mission was صلى الله عليه وسلم to guide you to the straight path it was to guide you to Jannah he sacrificed everything for you صلى الله عليه وسلم so you can become a Muslim for you to know about Allah his life didn't affect you his biography didn't touch you but then a football player who made money for himself or a basketball player who made good money for himself had no he hasn't done anything for you doesn't know who you are didn't exert any effort towards your life did not contribute anything to your life necessarily but you're emotional about it you cry you're so touched by this or even an artist a singer a rapper even worse your heart moves when you speak about them when you hear about them and when you read their biography think here is very important and maybe you like Muhammad's life you either don't read his biography and if you do read it it doesn't have any effect on you it doesn't touch you for you it's like yeah it did happen that's a contradiction and there's something really wrong there which in شاء الله تعالى it needs curing it needs to be worked on it needs to be looked at and also definitely it needs recognition you have to recognize something is not right here if you're in a state of denial there's no way that it can be cured I'm going to conclude there in شاء الله تعالى anything which I have said that was wrong or incorrect is from me and Shaytan شاء الله تعالى أشهد أن لا إله إلا الله أستغفرك واتبلي you are rewarded for every single person who benefits from one of our videos as a result of your like or subscribe it's an easy 2 second action that you definitely don't want to miss out on do it now click like and subscribe and don't forget to make that intention


Longer is usually better. For GPUs, that usually means a bigger cooling components. Better cooling means better speeds. But longer also means sag. That means the weight of the card might cause it to bend or in extreme cases, even break off from the motherboard. To combat sag, you need support. It's not recommended just to put any old thing under your GPU. We tried out DeepCools ST500 and it is extremely easy to install and will keep any size GPU well supported. It slots into the back of your case just like any other card and then inside the case, there are two support points. The top GPU point and the bottom case point. Both points can be adjusted left and right, up and down. So whatever the size and dimensions of your GPU and case, you can customize the ST500 to support the GPU properly. Plus, the ST500 comes with ARGB lighting as well. Super easy to use and it'll save the back of your GPU without breaking the bank.


Sam here. I'm far. Oh, they're going already. They're going already. I Trinket PS, Trinket PS. Deathblind, Deathblind. I'm dotting the one that cloaked. Spamming heals, spamming heals. Gonna hit me. I can't, I can't. I'm blindfolded. He has a dot. Yeah, that can be annoying at least. I tried, dude, I tried. Yeah, I just want to melee him. Fuck's sake. Yeah, I'm gonna, I'm gonna reshields.  I have my Trinket for the next go. He doesn't, so he shouldn't kill me. That's not going to open.  What to expect of these people really, right? Of course, not too much. You can ambush you from there though, can you? Now what?  Yeah, I mean, what do, what do? I can't get to him. I just need to force him to commit a bit more. Maybe I should go down and res so that he can't keep running. Yeah, very engaging. Yeah, but doesn't do a lot. So you have to keep on doing this and then just outrun him at the pillar until you can melee him. Yeah, I mean here he can't run after the saps. He has to open eventually and he can't run. Or what you can do, you can like, shuttle side should be, I'm wondering now exactly why. Maybe he's gonna take it surely.  He'll res, res, res, res. Yeah, I'm in combat. He threw me. Oh fuck, I didn't see my bad one. Maybe no. This angle though. What is he doing? What is he doing? He's doing damage. He can set me from up top. Hold him over a mile, that's right to God. Wait for the very end. Oh my God, it's too early. It's okay. There's one amount of bandages too, that's right. I should stay. I need to get further away though. I shouldn't go here. Yeah, he'll just step you forward there. He'll dance. Yep, no cost for 30 though. He's prepping a minute as well. Is he? I've got four minutes on mine. Isn't it eight minutes? No, no, it's five minutes for sub. Actually my time is running. My time is running. Yeah, mine and I as well, but I know it. Mine says three minutes as well, but I know he has it now. I think I fixed this now. Well, we had it. How do you do this on the bar? Custom spells. Good. Good. Good. He's prepping maybe now. He's kidding as well. He should have pierced.  I should have pierced earlier than this. Yeah. Well, he might be dead now. Maybe. You should be really, really open, so you cannot easily run away. After you get into your next dance. He has it at seven, by the way. Nice. Do it again, Laura. Yeah, but I had eye for this one. I know. You could just do it again as soon as he peeks. Yeah. Again, he's no cost for 20. Give the rocket maybe for the next 20 minutes. I didn't get it. Fuck, man. I tried to do two buttons. He would have died. Or maybe you're committing to reflective shield for the win. I don't think he can kill me. I'm going to save the rocket for the cloak. Yes.  I could have done it so much cleaner though. My rocket behind the shift X, right? And my pain is one. So I wanted a rocket and pain him. Yeah, it was too slow to do both. For what? It's more regen than the spark. Come slow. I didn't get the PS off. Got it now. Double miss kick. Fearing both, maybe? Fearing both, maybe? Got double lots for you. What are you going to do, Mr. Rogue? He turns flat. He's so mad. He's so mad. Just disabled my nameplate. Is he going to gouge the pet? Am I going to scatter a step? Oh, no. It's too slow. Maybe I'm just melded. Dude, how much PvE gear are they wearing?  They're wearing reckoning or a lot as well. To one-shot the snakes. Sap on me. They got double sap. I trinket PS. Going to hit him out of line. Best I can do. Death blind? Second blind? It's all you know. We'll be you eventually though, again. I'm afraid. They're running out of mobility here. Through it. We got the trinket all the way. Dead, please answer. If you're dead blind, in each game, surviving. If you didn't do that, we'd just lose. No chance. Instead, they're losing every game. Because they're going for the most obvious blinds in human history, every game. It's doable for fuck's sake. Can we just go here again? We have some other teams. We're so boring. They got the sap on the pet this time, by the way. That was scary. For sure. They always get the sap on the pet. I can't really do anything about it. Is it worth sending it into the flare now? No, because I mean, I could. Eyes of the beast? Then obviously, if he saps it, we already have range. I mean, I guess I could do that. There's no way they'd go on it, right? No, not unless you and CC. But even then, if they get the sap on it, I'll just empty it. There's no way. He's 100% coming out if he saps it in that flare. Oh yeah, that's true, I guess. Eye of the beast.    It was so wrong.  So he dies and the beast sticks straight on. The trap, yeah, yeah, yeah. Why would you fucking... Why would you set the pet on TVC though? There's no Ros. I can't remember where it was, there was a reason for it. We wanted to move the pet on. I think they were killing the pet at one point actually, that was why. And they could get from outside of the trap, if we didn't eyes of the beast, because it would just bug and move away from the hunter. Rather than being directly stacked. I spawned by the way, if you want to run from the fresh flare to the entrance now. I'm just going to throw... I'll keep the bomb on you. I'm going there. I got it, I got it, I'm coming back. PS? I'll shrink it, I'll shrink it. Trinket fit? It's dead. It'll be blind, it'll be blind. I love to see it. How do you lose? Dude, if I wasn't old, I would have got him out of the stealth faster as well. Fuck, man.  I got in combat, I got in combat. Frost. I got the PS, I got the PS. Second blind, I trinket it first. Cheap shot me, going to try and fit. Kidney half. Still living. You can't get me. Swamming heals? Oh, I got a crit. I'm sorry, I'm losing you maybe a little bit. I have one more freedom of left actually. They're all chilling in my thingy trap, so all you will...   They stepped on my pet as well. Nice. Unconventional, you know, forcing my trinket with nothing. Yeah. Alright, wait, what do we want to do? We'll just go on the pillar here. Actually, we can swap over and put the... He's out, he's out, he's out. Trinket fit? No, I didn't get the PS. Or maybe it's good, maybe it's good. I'm in full blind, I can't trink it. Why not? There's half blind, I got shield on you. Gonna PS after. I dot both, I dot both. Good, good, good. All you bro. Shield... Herming...