hat this study does is it assumes zero funding for HOV lanes Now I'm not advocating for that and quite honestly I don't like that my greenway scenario has been tied to that because that kind of cooks the books really But I don't know that we can say there's no funding available for that option Commissioner Schifrin talked about an independent analysis Relying on past RTC studies And putting perhaps too much getting perhaps too much input although we do appreciate the input from our staff Getting too much input from our staff who repeatedly publicly states a desire for one particular outcome is Not the way to get an independent analysis What if we compared ourselves to places that are doing things better than us like Davis and Boulder both of which are Platinum bike cities with bus systems that work much better than ours or places like Copenhagen That have evolved beyond the car invasion to become people-centered places Communities that are friendly to people of all ages and abilities. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Halsey Hello, my name is Tina Andrea. I just want to reiterate Don't forget the poor don't forget the people in South County that are not represented here They're working they commute from Watsonville here They have to carpool a lot of them don't have a lot of money. Don't forget the disabled don't forget People that cannot that they're not really here. I'm looking around and everybody's Looks like me middle class and white or upper middle class and I want to say that We need a rail with the trail. I bicycle, but I also know the importance of a rail I I go over the hill. I take the train from Santa Cruz I mean sorry from I go all the way up to Oakland and Berkeley I get off I go off to the concerts I go with friends We live in Oakland. We take the train and rail into San Francisco I've did recently I did the my friend lives down in Ontario We took it into downtown LA for the march in science my god It was great passing all the cars on the freeway and on the roads. We need a rail We can have it low enough where where people with walkers can get on it people with bicycles Women with strollers grandmothers with strollers people with wheelchairs, and I'm just asking you for people who are legally blind And I know a lot of people who will not ride Their bikes to work You know some people will some people won't and I think a lot will not so please continue Please consider the rail in your decision along with a bike and walking trail. Thank you Thank you. Just just for clarification I I've sat on almost every committee in this county and and this commission has the best representation of any Committee there's one supervisor from every district and there's a representative from every city. Go ahead mr. Good afternoon chair Batroff and fellow commissioners. My name is Mark Maceti Miller I'm a professional civil engineer, and I'm the chair of the friends of the rail and trail Congratulations to all of you and your staff. This is a monumental piece of work It looks pretty darn good at first glance. I've spent the last week reading through it. It looks great As the friends of the rail and trail we are not surprised that scenario B comes out the clear winner Many people have mentioned some of the clear advantages I'll remind you of a few that struck me as particularly important one is safety With a hundred and eighteen fewer collisions than most of the other scenarios. That's about one less collision every three days Pretty significant Not to mention the money we're saving the environment by far the reduction in vehicle miles traveled something like 230,000 vehicle miles traveled per day. That's about 94 million per year when you think about carbon CO2 reduction, that's like a forest, you know, we'd be planting a forest the highest number of Bike share, you know, no surprise to us when you combine the multimodal transit systems You see an increase in bike ridership. That's what this study reflects And of course the higher use of public transit The one thing that I did notice it didn't seem like it was quite up to snuff was the state rail plan doesn't seem like it Got a fair shake And I can understand that because it was a draft and now it's final that was final to about two or three weeks ago But that state rail plan is really important It's a target's a 1.5 billion dollars for rail transit improvements in the Central Coast and there's only three projects in there So there'd be a lot of money available Also, it clearly states that the state's moving from highway expansion to railway expansion and lastly as you heard Kyle Grattinger It's really a vision for creating Turning California into the Switzerland of North America and we have a rail line and we ought to be part of that that vision So thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Miller Hi, I'm Ryan Sarnataro. I'm a bike rider in the county and Use it use the bike a lot more in the car whenever I can The question came up as to who the consultants were talking to where were they getting their Direction from and if it wasn't from the commissioners, then it was from the staff and the staff has a very particular bias in the situation I Notice in this document that that the first thing that comes up is widening of pathway on San Lorenzo River trust will approve now If you're going to take the rails out, you don't need to do that You don't need to spend that money the fact that this is at the top Indicates the level of bias that went into the the direction that the consultants were given and so I'm Concerned that there was very good data that was provided Greenway had a had a study made that included the synergies and the Increases in use that would happen if you have a wide separated trail and that option Really didn't get a proper vetting in this situation. And so how can you go forward with? one of these other scenarios that spends hundreds of millions of dollars on Rail when you really didn't understand or don't have a complete accounting for what would happen if you Had a proper trail. Thank you. Thank you Any other comments? You'll go ahead and close the public comment and bring it back. I don't know if there's any comments at this point Commissioners and comment or should we all just want to do our homework and study? This is coming back on the tpw meeting, right? So Yeah, we're gonna bring this back as a priority. I think we're okay with that and have a big conversation then Questions down here comments. Mr. Johnson. So I want to get back to the the whole concept of Where we can agree on facts. So what I'm hearing is as much as people want to Embrace a scenario embrace a study at the same time They're differing facts and differed differ differing approaches to things like a full Trail the amount of savings on this scenario or this data that was Inputted so how do we get there? I mean, you know bud bud mentioned You know one of the one of the real problems that we're having as a both a commission and maybe even a community Is that nobody can agree on the facts? And I don't know if this if this deserves a Peer review to some degree so we can kind of tighten up, you know on the one hand It's a repayment of 116 funds goes from 10 million or 11 million dollars to 28 million Okay, if you can't agree on that then how are we going to make a decision based on quote the facts? So I'm not saying that right now we vote on whether or not we should have a peer review But at the same time I know for much smaller projects and where you're talking about 1.2 billion dollars as a possibility Sometimes you have to revisit and make sure that the facts presented by these very capable people. I mean we're using This particular group for our A study in in scott's valley. I respect them, but at the same time we have a serious issue with coming together on What the real facts are and when we when we agree on those we Enhance our the opportunity for us to agree on a solution for this for this For this corridor and for the transportation needs of our community. Thank you Mr. Schiff I think it's important to clarify that we're really not talking about facts Because we're projecting into the future and we don't know what the future is going to be so when these studies are done They're based on certain assumptions Even knowing what's going on now is tricky and we can have disagreements about what our current reality is we have disagreements about what our past reality was and Oftentimes what we think of as facts represent our values and the assumptions we make based on our values to the extent that Commissioners believe that at the end of this process, we're going to have a community consensus I Just wonder where they've been for the last three years because that's not going to happen There are basic differences and values that are going on here and we have a study that's trying to project based on the best Information that's available statistically What that future might look like under different conditions and if you have other assumptions You're going to get the other you're going to get the other projections and You know, there's no nothing happening here today is a surprise to me The people who just want to trail only are not going to be happy with any fat any Projections that show that an alternative to the trail only is going to be better than the trail only and the people who Want the rail trail are not going to be happy if the study had come out and showed that a trail only was going to be better We're what we asked for and I think what we've got was a Report that's based on the information. That's available statistically that can be used that's credible to What I think is an end as independent the consultant is we're going to be able to get and To think that we're going to be able to resolve all this through peer review or subcommittees or whatever is I Just think deluding ourselves ultimately the commission is going to have to evaluate this material Get more information to the extent that it's needed and then make a Decision that some people are going to like and some people are not going to like because there's just a fundamental difference of opinion about what should be done with the corridor and I Don't think there's any way to avoid that Thank you, you know, I'm just going to wrap it up with I you know I think what we've got is a great document in front of us. I believe that the people that created this document Have interjected everything into it to make it as accurate as possible If there's a commissioner you read this document and you see something here that doesn't make sense to you doesn't seem accurate I encourage you to contact staff and to ask a question and at the end We're going to be voting on what we as commissioner Schifrin said what we best believe moves this county forward I don't want to get hung up in the numbers, you know, we all know what it costs to buy the trail But we all know that it isn't just paying back that exact number So it's a range and a lot of this stuff is a range and as we've all learned in construction Some projects may seem like they cost a certain amount and most likely they're going to cost more So I think everybody should just take that into their consideration when they look at this document I think what we need really need to do is just take the time to evaluate it Continue the discussions and the dialogue and we're going to get to that process whether it be in December or January Or whether we have a new director on board. We're going to get to this decision sooner or later So thank you all for your participation Moves on to our next item, which is the cruise one five one one program update and ease Welcome and I do have a PowerPoint for this presentation Two three We're good Go ahead. Thank you. Okay. Well, that's getting loaded. I'll go ahead and start So my name is on a shank. I'm a transportation planner with the RTC. I've been here for about a year now and I will try to keep this short. I know we've all had a long morning or afternoon So I'll just give you a brief review of what the cruise five one one program is It's a travel primarily a travel information program that provides services to commuters residents When you're in school here tourists you can find information on our website about Driving biking walking car pulling all modes possible We also work with employers to develop customized programs for those employers That allow them to encourage their employees to get out of single occupancy vehicle mode shares and into car pulling or biking We also work with a number of agencies on these types of programs and messaging campaigns around safety bike to work day we participate in all those types of events and Have a number of partners that we work with to encourage non-drive-alone modes of Transportation every everything from nonprofits like ecology action to local jurisdictions As I said, I've been here for about a year now and have had the opportunity to think about some of the challenges that we face in transportation demand management particularly in santa Cruz County and It's not surprisingly. These challenges are not unique to us. There are challenges that the profession faces across the country The first is that we have a diverse population in terms of need We've just witnessed that this morning with all the conversation and dialogue If the results of not being proactive is that you can end up with ad hoc approaches to TDM We also have many different stakeholders and by stakeholders. I Mean all those agencies that we partner with And if we don't coordinate well with those stakeholders Then you can end up with very inconsistent messaging and approaches to trying to manage transportation demand We also and this is not unique to us again have difficulty in measuring the impacts of our program which means that it's hard to prove success and The thing I want to focus on the most in terms of our biggest challenge is that we have an Increasing array of shared mobility options Not just here in santa Cruz but throughout the country and it's really hard to keep up with those and we're also seeing greater and greater advances in technology Yes, please so the biggest change that we see coming online is Related to autonomous vehicles The future of our transportation is very very different We're going to see not just autonomous vehicles, but more electrification of our modes and People are calling this a transportation disruption It will fundamentally change how we move around and this is probably the biggest change that we've seen since the introduction of the automobile now One of the things that we'll see with automation is Interconnectedness vehicles communicating with other vehicles vehicles communicating with our Hard infrastructure by that I mean lights and signals Vehicles can even communicate with wearables so a vehicle communicating with a pedestrian and their smart watch And then finally and where we where I come in is vehicles that communicate with planners So providing data to planners behind the scenes so we can monitor and understand what's happening on our roadways Can I hit the wrong button? Sorry And so with that what I'd really like to emphasize is the data is actually going to become the new infrastructure We are used to thinking of data as information that helps us make informed decisions But it actually is a piece of infrastructure and it's becoming more so that way We're gonna have to rely on it in ways that we can't even anticipate right now And So that's one of the reasons why this is called the transportation disruption it will change how we do planning I'm not gonna go into the details of these plans, but there are several cities now that are developing plans Just around the digital age. How do we manage mobility in the this era of? Data as infrastructure and it requires a rethinking of how we manage our infrastructure Based on improving access to that data a number of private sector companies are now on board with this I don't know if you saw the news yesterday. We're thinking this the day before But forward uber and Lyft are all agreeing to openly share their data about usage of their services Okay, I'm not sure why that So the way that this has been talked about addition to transportation disruption is that it's a revolution. It's there's three revolutions that we're seeing in transportation and Those revolutions again are share or automation electrification and sharing of transportation services this could lead to a number of outcomes There's three represented on this slide one is the business as usual, which we always consider the second is electrification and automation together without sharing and What that will do and you know this slide actually is a bit dated shows a relatively stable number of vehicles on the road but most people now agree that this will the Introduction of automation is going to increase Vehicle trips. It's going to increase VMT We're gonna see people who which is a great thing people who previously didn't have access to vehicles will now have access to them increasing the trips and VMT with sharing we have the Possibility of really Not only reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, but also dramatically decreasing the number of vehicles on the roadway Roadways so the way that this is being talked about is Kind of a heaven and hell scenario and where are we gonna end up? We could end up in a hell scenario if we don't manage our Infrastructure and really encourage sharing we could end up in a heaven scenario Which provides greater access and mobility to people of all ages and economic backgrounds if we encourage sharing Can you advance it please to the next slide? So fair and peers has this chart that's very interesting up on their website What they did is they tested a number of different Transportation and models travel demand models looking at the possibility of what would happen with the introduction of automated vehicles and They looked at both trip-based models and activity based models and the more traditional limited its sensitivity models and one thing that's Really striking is the change in vehicle trips again. This is the heaven and hell scenario comparison if we do a good job Really pushing shared Shared usage of our infrastructure Then we end up with potentially reduction in vehicle trips if we don't we're going to see very Substantial increases please go to the next slide. Thanks. And this slide is from the NACTO website and Again, it just shows what our current Existing business as usual scenario looks like in terms of our typical street section Cross-section and what it could look like if we have a future of shared mobility which includes Not just shared vehicles, but bicycle bike share shared transit which is already a shared mode and We you see a huge increase in the capacity of our roadway system I'm not going to go into all the details of how this will change land use But this is this could really substantially change how we think about curb space and parking I try to use that. Nope. Okay, so where I'm going with this in terms of how this relates to cruise 511 is if we're going to get to the heaven scenario and Encourage shared mobility then we really need to update how we're approaching shared mobility We have seen a really rapid adoption of service Mobilities of service platforms. It's kind of one of the new Tech lingo's Adopted from the tech sector where they talk about software as a service Well, people more and more are starting to think of mobility as as a service that we provide to customers So that's sort of a mentality. It's been adopted from the private sector and you see a lot more government agencies Doing partnerships with the private sector in order to implement these types of platforms There's two examples up on the screen It's been shown to be very effective. You can If I'm a commuter or trying to get to a ballgame in San Mateo County I can look at potential rideshare matches or how to get there by transit or walking or biking And my choices are not just shown in terms of mileage, but there's other Ramifications of my choices that are shown on there such as the co2 emissions and the cost implications So we're trying to encourage that sharing There's a large number of people of companies out there that are providing the service And what the logos you see on the bottom of the screen there is just a smallest mattering of that Thanks This is just what I was able to put together in a couple of hours in terms of looking at The counties around the central coast who have implemented some level of this online type of service You'll see a gap in Santa Cruz County Our neighboring counties have been able to implement this. I think really think that in order to encourage more Interregional Transportation sharing we should we should move towards this direction this mobility service platform direction So What would this look like in terms of how we get there so the first step would be to develop policies that actually acknowledge the disruption that we're going to see in transportation and Encourage shared mobility and then you get to practice and this Mobilities of service platform. I was talking about is actually one element of what we call the practice implementation of the policies and And then you know engagement we do that already we do a lot of that But the difference here is again treating the transportation user as a customer as a client And really figuring out what it is that is easy reduces barriers to use Including things like affordability and safety And and then finally monitoring These mobilities of service platforms allow us to monitor reductions and greenhouse gas emissions trip reductions and increases in non-drive-alone mode share options so I'll close with that and just this is really just an update to let you know where What I'm thinking and where we're going with the program. We will be applying for a grant In the the sustainable communities grant application. It was just recently announced the call for projects So yeah, I look forward to hearing more about that grant and also moving forward with the program I'll take any questions if there are any from the commissioners any questions for any Can you go back to the slide with the counties police that have the blue and the green Full service versus limited service. Are you what are you looking at sure? Yeah? basically limited service means ride-share matching only And and then the full service means that you can get everything from information on ways carpool options to You know your transit system some there's been some conversations about And I don't I think some cities have been successful with this not necessarily on the Central Coast But having like a one-payment system using this platform that would obviously be a long-term goal And what that could look like is you would pay once and have one car like a clipper card But that would also be valid for bike share systems And do we have a difference in cost factor or do we see what the investments are the other counties on what their That's a good question I would it would require me to look into that more and call those respective agencies I'm sure we'll hear more about this as well. Thank you Any other questions? I'm gonna go and open to the public anybody from the public have a question comment. Thanks Isn't it just stunning to watch all the people who believe they're very interested in our transportation future Go pouring out of the room after the unified corridor study item was over And then we have one of your transportation nerds getting up and talking to you about all new pieces of the future That we need to be thinking about I'd like to express my own opinion here. I approach these new technologies with interest and skepticism aware that Technology always has a kind of front-end sales job promoting what's great about it and The downsides are the parts that might not actually work out tend to emerge later so for instance a lot of us believe that Uber and Lyft are part of our transportation future and yet One article. I've just read lately that was published in American Prospect reveals that Uber the more rides Uber gives the more money it loses. So and if I can recite the statistics correctly from memory in 2016 they lost three billion dollars and in 2017 they lost four and a half billion As soon as we have a major economic recession and investors lose heart Uber could go bankrupt So that's you know, they haven't figured out actually how to have it make money yet. So All of these Possibilities I think are fascinating. I hope your commission will Have your staff tell you more about this bring this forward further in the future because it's it's really part of what you should be looking at Thanks. Thank you, sir Afternoon Miss Krause. Hello, Yonah Kastraus bike Santa Cruz County I just wanted to say I really like the direction that cruise 5-1-1 is going As speaking as a millennial at the future is Multimodal we want options and we use several of them to to get where we want to go So thank you on these for bringing it this way. Thank you for your comments Okay, go ahead and bring it back. That's a present. Oh, I'm sorry come on up Hi commission, I'm taken Spicer. I'm alumni of the RTC I wanted to say I just want to remind you that it was only three years ago that cruise 5-1-1 And the RTC was able to bring all of the TDM resources online in one place Now it isn't that we didn't have websites before but the entire branding under cruise 5-1-1 and the integration of all of the modes in one place was a very Significant leap and I just want to say that happened only three years ago So I think this current presentation that Anais just presented you with the the significant advancement and disruption that's happening with technology is Is a major challenge? I think going forward in terms of how you take what you've now got as a as a great platform to the next level And I really encourage you to continue Thinking creatively and continue to make investment in this a really important aspect of Transportation which is helping users really use the system the systems in both the private and public Context that we have It's very challenging. I think for people to figure out Where to go and I think by centralizing The resources under the cruise 5-1-1 umbrella, whatever else you choose to enhance there is a really important Step that you've already taken to help the public figure it out. So thank you. Thank you for your comments Okay, now we'll bring it back and Any other comments that just in her report So with that we'll adjourn and our next meeting is on Just thought of it Anais When she was talking So is the platform does it appear differently? Different for a visitor or for someone who lives here. Is there a different way to approach it? Perhaps like a visitor might have different questions as opposed to someone actually lives here Yeah, they operate You can be you can use it one time different platforms operate differently So some platforms that I looked into you register when you register You have to identify if this is a one-time trip or if this is a regular commute trip That seems a little clunky to me This the screenshot I had on on the PowerPoint What I was able to go without any registration and figure out what car pole matches would be But I would then have to register to contact those people But I could still figure out transit or lift or biking options without actually being a registered user. So it varies Yeah Yeah, and one of the goals is really to consolidate all the options that Exists currently for a car pole alone. You have scoop duet ways car pole uber Uber pole lift line and there's just so many options out there that having them under one umbrella gives you the best chance to find a match Okay, now we'll go ahead and adjourn to the next meeting will be the RTC meeting on November 1st at 9 a.m. In Watsonville and our TPW meeting which we've now added the unified quarter study to will be on Thursday October 18th at 9 a.m. At in this chambers right here, and we're adjourned. Thank you


We're going to work straight out from the head just like this. When we bring everything out, we're going to come back, and we're going to have a square or balanced line here. So we're going to work vertically and bring everything traveling straight out to that. We take our line first in vertical section, bring that hair straight. Now I'm going to continue over. I'm going to grab a section right next to it, and I'm going to pull that previously cut section halfway over from where it lives to the new section. So they'll both kind of meet in the middle. The same thing again, vertical section. I'll grab half of what I just cut, always combing the guide to the new hair. Now be aware of this elevation here, right? Because if I drop it, even the slightest bit, I'm going to get a really heavy roundness to this haircut because the head is moving away right here, right?  Cross check. Looks crazy, right? It's okay, it's okay. Today we're having a little foam of shape, but it will all come together in the end. Have a little faith in me, okay? I've got a little faith in me. Oh. The question that happens every time is how do you know where's your guide to match up both sides? They don't have to be exactly the same length. They got to be pretty close, right? So I do want to make sure, once I cut it, that they are similar in length. So now I can kind of determine, I just really need to take about a quarter of an inch off of there, this, cut a little bit more, that, and then I will check these two. Comb the previous section halfway to the new section. Sure, you can see that guide clean through. Another one, half of the old. Now we're going to comb out the front, and we're going to work the top. The way that I'm going to do that is I'm going to take a center parting. This is a great trick when you want to connect two sides together. So we are going to cut our first section, grab pieces from that previously cut section, and I'm just going to come across and cut just like this to create a guideline. And then we'll do the same thing on the other side to get our guide. And this line is going to be straight across on the head, just like this. What that's going to do is once I'm coming out here, it's going to build length in the front of the head shape here. When you have a line here, shortest point, is at the apex, right? This is the shortest point to the comb. And now everything that happens past that apex, it's curving down, so the hair's getting longer towards the fringe. So because of that, I'll get a little bit longer fringe area. I'm going to work horizontal sections through it all the way through the head shape, and I'm going to work this way, because I want to work, I want to be cutting interior to exterior, just like that. And there's my line. Now, don't get in a hurry and cut all this and be satisfied, because it's all bunched up in my finger here. My fingers are not this long. So you've got to recomb and reposition your hand to continue that line forward. Grab that middle section. Theme of the cut though, it's going to travel over. So I comb my previous section halfway to the new section. And that's where I cut. Hair's bunched up here. So recomb. So that last comb I'm actually pulling towards me because I want to keep this shape straight up in the air. That's the line that I cut with the guide at the beginning. So here as well. So I don't want to tilt into this edge as I travel the guide around. I'm not trying to really create a round shape, a fully ground shape. The head shape is going to do that on its own. So cutting it to have a little bit more of a squarish effect to the layering will give it a more little collapsed and then bubble instead of just a big bubble. We've got all these layers which are going to look really cool when it's all finished out. And then you've got this long frame. The crown, what I want to do is I want to go concave layer. So right here, we're going to work a concave shape just like this out. So it'll scoop out with the layer. I'm going to connect it to this top piece. And then from that, we're going to build out this scooped concave layer. So vertical section. Oh, and we're also going to pivot on this one. So it's going to be a round shape. Here's my guide, short section. Now comb that hair over towards the new section. Lift up. Fun.  So you always want to make sure that your fingertips are pointing towards the head and then you'll be able to cut those concave layers. So here, fingers pointing towards the head. It's a pivot with your elbow and you're good to go. There you go. Now I'm pulling towards myself. Carry that old hair, old section for the guide over to the new section. The disconnection that's under this, as of right now is holding a lot of weight. So having this disconnect underneath the bottom will actually hold some of that density in the length which will be beneficial to us later in the cut. See how it fills it out a little bit. So right now we got a crazy looking cut, right? But we're gonna finish it out. We're gonna do a bunch of dry cutting and turn this into something awesome. Don't you worry about it. So there's a lot of softening that we're gonna do in here. We're gonna go in and cut into the fringe like this, round this off and really play with that interior shape that we have. The reason it works so well to cut it across the top like we did and then go in and put the fringe is because when you're holding the hair up here and cutting it and layering it, when you're layering this, this hair is being brought way beyond 90 degrees, right? Oh, it's focusing on this face. I was like, what is it looking at? When we look at it, this 90 degrees, right? Out from this point, 90 degrees, 90 degrees, 90 degrees. So if I'm working a straight line across, this part that would be 90 degrees is now being popped up here. So this is zero, right? This is 180 up here. So we're kind of a little bit like a 125, right? Which those numbers don't really matter, but what it means is 90 is already layering. Above 90 is really kind of collapsing and making this line or making this nice and soft. So if it's nice and soft and not dense here, cutting this blunt line is a lot easier. So now what I'm gonna do is I wanna determine the length that I want this fringe. And once I get it put into my comb, I use a wider tooth comb. This is the Delrin 705 comb. And that's a little crooked. That's okay. Here we go. This is the FSE Precision Pro six inch. Like six, six and a half inch for this technique because you can reach a little bit further. Kind of actually liking the way that corner is. I'm just gonna etch into it a little bit. Finish up this corner. Little trick here is to make sure you do not go into the hairline over here. So look at that already, ta-da.  And now all of a sudden it's looking like a haircut. So this is the six inch scissor. And then that was for the fringe. Now I move into either the five and a half Precision Pro or Elite. So here is the pro focus for the Elite. There we go. So now I'm gonna go over here and I'm gonna work some texture into this haircut. Now remember, we cut this vertical but I'm gonna go in horizontally and just create some texture in this line. And I'm not changing anything that I cut, right? Everything's still coming straight up. But that little texture just softens it. Taking those lines and softening them through. And I never want to elevate this blunt line that I created. So we'll keep that. Let this just kind of fall over. You can see how that blends in. Now we're gonna put this scissor to work. Texturizing scissor here. That is really cool, Matt. You like it? Yeah, when you put it on to cut, that perfect dog like, oh boy. That's the point. I love it. I'm gonna slide cutting through, just melting them in with a little spray in here. What do we think? We like it?