I still don't honestly know how I got her to bring her down the hall. Boring. It's not like I know about it and I don't read it. I don't even know about it. All right, let's Google it. So as you may have just seen, I dropped the whole stack. Hey guys, it's Leon and I'm here today with my August wrap up. Where am I gonna- Oh no, oh no, oh no! So as you may have just seen, I dropped the whole stack. I was already gonna tell you that like normally I do it in the order that I read them because I stack my books as I read them throughout the month and then I just reverse the stack. I mean, that's how I do my wrap up. So I can tell you in the order in which I read them. But my stack was so big I didn't feel like doing that. So I was just gonna do it in reverse order because that's how they're stacked. Now I dropped it. So now it's in no kind of order. I just kind of stacked it by size so that the big heavy ones are on the bottom. So, these are in no particular order. You wanna see what order I read them in then follow me on Goodreads because you'll see it there. But first and foremost, oh yeah, how many books did I read? 15, 16, 17 books? I wasn't purposely trying to like one up myself from last month. Be like, why would 16 last month read 17 this month? It's also not equivalent because like, so I read four things on my Kindle. So I have my Kindle here with little sticky notes so I remember and I'm doing those first so that I don't forget. Two of the books I read on Kindle are novellas. Not like tomes. So, I mean, technically that is how many books I read but full disclosure. Like I said, let's do what I read on Kindle first. So I read A Dead, Gin and Cairo and the Haunting of Tramcar 015 by P. Dejalee Clark. And that's because I would like to read his full length novel, his first full length novel, which I own and the name of it escapes me. It has the word gin in the title. I am 90% sure. And I don't know where I put it. So I can't really check. All right, let's Google it. A Master of Gin. There we go. I want to read the master or a master of gin and I understand or I was made to understand that you really do need to read The Haunting of Tramcar 015 and A Dead, Gin and Cairo first because they kind of introduce you to the world and I guess to some of the characters because the first chronological, the first one is A Dead, Gin and Cairo and then in The Haunting of Tramcar 015 one of the characters from A Dead, Gin and Cairo appears. So I'm guessing that the full length novel either focuses on both of them or they will appear or maybe it's just the world. I don't really know. I just know you're supposed to read those first. So I did. I got them from the library. No, that's not true. I got one of them from the library and the other one I got on Kindle like from Amazon because it was like 99 cents. So I read those. I didn't love them. I feel like this is a situation that's similar to how I felt about Murderbot where because it's so hyped and people are just like, that's so good, it's so good. And I'm sure that Ring Shout is genuinely wonderful and I really want to read that but I feel like all the just general Peter Jelly Clark hype kind of made me expect too much. So I didn't hate the Dead Gin or a Dead Gin and Cairo or Hunting of Tramp are 015. I just was very disappointed. It didn't really grab me. The mystery didn't feel very mysterious to me. I expected it to be more, to feel more like a detective story and then just like have the trappings of like sort of Cairo and like some gin but it was just like in such a short novella there's wild magic going on that like even if it was a full length novel I'd be like, this was a bit much but it was a novella. So we're like, we barely had time to get to know the main character before we had like apocalypse level, Avengers Endgame level things going on. And like Marvel took its time building us up to Endgame which I've never actually seen Endgame. Please don't kill me. By the time you get to Endgame it doesn't feel like it's like 0 to 11, 0 to 60 or whatever you're supposed to say overnight or instantaneously kind of builds up like the first few movies like the first Iron Man movie like, there's a big bad but it's not that big. And then the first time the Avengers all got together there was a pretty big bad and then when the Avengers got together again it was an even bigger bad and then by the time we get to Endgame it's like, okay, well the apocalypse. So Adenton and Cairo got like, it went from like introducing you to the main character to apocalypse in like two pages. I mean, more than two pages but not much more than two pages in the novella. I don't even, I didn't have time to feel invested and so I couldn't even care about the apocalypse because I was like, I still don't even know where we are or why this matters. So not my favorite but I am still looking forward to a Dead Jin and Cairo and I'm very much looking forward to reading Ring Shout whenever I get to Ring Shout which is nothing to do with these books it's just also by Peter Jayleigh Clark. Yeah, not. I think I gave haunting and Dead Jin three stars each because I was like, it's a cool world. Just, I felt nothing about these stories, nothing whatsoever or the characters. It was just an interesting enough world that I was like, I'd like to see a story that I like be set in this world but this wasn't it. And I also read Ace, which is a nonfiction book that I've seen a few people recommend. Hence why I picked it up or hence why I even knew about it because I don't really know about nonfiction because I'm a terrible reader. So I'm not even aware of it. It's not like I know about it and I don't read it. I don't even know about it. So anyway, specifically I think both Bethany and Mara read Ace and I think Jess from Jess Owens read it. Maybe Jishana? I don't know. I just feel like I saw a bunch of people reading it and all praising it. So I read it also very short and it is nonfiction about, well about the Ace identity. But moreover, like it is about asexuality. It is, that's what it's about. But a lot of the book is kind of contextualizing asexuality in our modern day society and how the modern day society doesn't really, like the way that stories are written, the way that people are represented in media, the way that people talk, like conversationally with each other, the expectations people have of each other or casual things that people say, they all kind of like don't allow for asexuality to exist. Like it's like it's invisible. Like it is just not acknowledged at all. And this isn't like, it's not like other queer identities where like we need more representation but it's certainly like people kind of like acknowledges existence. It's more of these like subtle ways in which everyday speech just presumes that you are sexual. Like that is the default assumption and there's never any language.  It's just assumptions about what people want like in books and movies. Like it's not even that there isn't an asexual character.  Again, in media but also in conversation like if a person isn't dating anyone, the assumption is like, oh well you need to put yourself out there. It's never like, oh maybe you don't want to put yourself out there. Maybe you're not interested in putting yourself out there. And if that is the case, it's usually like Tapan is like, are you like unwell? Have you been abused? So there's just like, the book does a lot to kind of unpack how we think of sexuality and how we think of love because again, a lot of words people tend to use a lot of like sexual words as synonyms for love and affection.  And like, that's not true. So the way that again, everyday speech just kind of like acts like asexuality doesn't exist and isn't an option. So it's just a really fascinating read for that reason. It really, really eye-opening just in general in terms of how we talk about relationships, how we talk about people, how we talk about sex, how we talk about love and how we kind of need more words because there's all different kinds of love and like making it all just kind of like, oh, you're like friend-zoning, you know, you're like my friend-zoned basically like brother from another mother, sister from another mister or there's like a sexual component and those are the only options versus like the spectrum of love because like we talked about, we talked about the gender spectrum a lot more but having love be all that spectrum of physicality from not at all to like only sexual because then there's also that there's people that are aromantic, which the book also talks about and about how like it's again, treated by society as like, there's something wrong with you because you just want sex and it's usually regarded in, especially in media as like a character flaw. Like this person needs to learn to feel. They need to learn to love and not just have throwaway casual encounters. It don't mean anything, but like some people are aromantic. So what do you want them to do? So yeah, it just, it did a lot to unpack how we talk about these things. So I highly recommend it. It was a really fascinating read. It's not very long at all. It's a very short book. So I do definitely recommend that. And the last book that I read on Kindle was sort of Kaigen by, oh God, who's the author? M.L. Wang I want to say? M.L. Wang. And I read this because my patrons picked it for me. I mean, a few months ago I was planning to read it and then I never got around to it. So my patrons picked it for me now to vlog and review for them. So I have done that. But briefly, it's not a new favorite. There are things about it that I very much enjoyed, but there are an equal number of things that I also thought were deeply flawed or not executed very well. So it was a mixed bag. Like it wasn't like all blah or all great or all horrible. It was just very mixed. Like certain aspects of it were like, wow. And other aspects I was like, I don't know. I mean, I can see why it struck a chord because it certainly stands out. But both the world building and like the choice to center a mother as the main character makes it stand out from the pack because adult fantasy doesn't tend to have a setting like we have in sort of Kaigen, which again, this is something I never heard anybody mention. So I want to mention it because I never heard this and it completely like threw me for a loop. The world of sort of Kaigen is modern. It is a fantasy story and it doesn't take place in the real world. It's not urban fantasy, but this fantasy world has like cell phones and televisions and that kind of thing, which again is refreshing because we tend to only ever see fantasy that if it's taking place in a fantasy world, then it is an archaic world. There's a spectrum of how archaic from like prehistoric to like vaguely Victorian and vibes. Usually if it's a modern setting then it's urban fantasy taking place in our real world. And this is not taking place in our real world, but it is a very modern setting. So that's refreshing. And again, centering a mother as the main character. But yeah, I had no idea. Like when I was reading it and I first got to the first reference to like cartoons or something on TV or in video games. And I was like, what? Which like when I got used to it, I was like, okay, that's fine, but I just wasn't expecting it. And if you're not expecting it, like it's just like ripped me out of the story because not because it was badly written just because like I'm trained to not expect that in fantasy. So, oh no, yeah. I think I gave it 3.5, so rounding up to four as I believe the conclusion I came to. So yeah, I recommend, but I think it's deeply flawed. Okay, so now going to the stack. I may say the phrase next up I read because it's just habit for me, but I've already explained how this is not in the order that I read these books. So I'll try to just say next up, but I might say next up I read just so you know it's a lie when I say that. So next up I have the drawing of the three by Stephen King. This is the second book in the Dark Tower series. I buddy read both the first and the second books with Bethany and we had a live chat on my channel talking about the first and second books and our impressions of the both first and second books. And I do plan to go on with the Dark Tower series, even though I felt very similarly to Bethany. I gave the books slightly higher ratings and I did slightly better with them. And I am more curious to see where this goes and to see honestly less the story, not really into the story. Again, we went in depth into why we had problems with these books in our live. So if you wanna check that out, the replay is available. I know that Stephen King wrote these books over a large span of years. And so watching Stephen King as an author grow over the course of this series is something that interests me. Again, not really the story so much. I just kind of am curious to watch the progress of this author over the course of this series. So for that reason, I'm not in a hurry, but I do want to read the rest of the series. And the super-duper Yikes on Bikes thing that is in this book in particular is like it's over. So that might be new, horrifically awful things. And I don't mean horror or I don't mean horrific in terms of it being horror. I mean like it's just Yikes. And that thing is like ended and resolved and is not a thing anymore by the end of this book. So there might be new fresh things that I take issue with, but that issue is done with and we won't have to see that again. So at least there's that. The next books in the series, they may not get better but they won't have that in them and that's a relief. So anyway, check out our live chat if you want to hear our full spoilery thoughts about these two books and why they did not work for us. And again, and we talked, I came to the conclusion based on what people were saying in the chat and like by talking through it with Bethany that I would go on with the series and that she would not. So anyway, check that out if you're interested, but otherwise if I have to say not a favorite. Next up I'll do these together, Othello and New Boy, which is the Hogarth Shakespeare retelling of Othello. I have a live chat on my channel where me and Heather discuss these because as I mentioned me and Heather are going through all the Hogarth Shakespeare's, which is this project of authors being commissioned to retell Shakespeare plays. So we're just kind of doing one a month. I mean, the play and the retelling, the play and the retelling. And in August we did Othello and New Boy. Othello is definitely my favorite Shakespeare tragedy and perhaps my favorite Shakespeare play. That's tougher because it's hard to compare tragedy and comedy, but it's for sure my favorite tragedy. So this was, the pressure was on. And if you want to watch again, me and Heather chat about Othello and we honestly spent a lot of the live talking just about Othello like unpacking the play, but we did talk about New Boy and why it didn't necessarily work for us. I think of the Hogarths, we think this is one of the better ones but it's not great. And I think we both agreed that a much better and a much more successful modern retelling of Othello is the film O with Julia Stiles and Josh Hartnett, which I'd never seen before but I watched after reading these books and yeah, that worked a whole lot better. The translation of like the characters and the situations into a modern setting worked a lot better in that movie than in New Boy. So if you're looking for an Othello retelling and you're trying to decide, I say watch that movie and skip New Boy. Oh, I did not read these back to back but I have them in my stack back to back. So we're gonna do them together and they look so nice together. The fourth book in The Raven Cycle, The Raven King and then the first book in the new spin-off series called Down the Hawk, which is about Ronin. Is there a name for the series? The Dreamer trilogy. Concluding The Raven Cycle, that was exciting and I loved The Raven Cycle and I love The Raven King and I gave this five stars and it was just an excellent conclusion. I had many feelings. It is a weird series. It's kind of hard to explain and discuss and I've also like previously when I've talked about the series I've struggled to kind of articulate what it's like and what I get out of it. It is just like a thing where Maggie Steve Otter's writing style is very distinct and unique. So it's either your thing or it's not. And so just Owens who hates The Raven Cycle, I don't know how but I convinced her to read Call Down the Hawk with me. I think because like she just told me she hated it and I was like, but why? I just gave the book five stars and she was like, but why? We were talking through it and we both agreed that the best part of The Raven Cycle is Ronin Lynch and I was like, well, the new spin-off series is about Ronin and she was like, okay, I'll read it with you. And again, I'm not sure how that happened but it did. So she read this with me. She hated it. I didn't hate it. I definitely liked it better than just it but we both kind of agreed that for a book about Ronin this is very similar to the King of Scars experience. If you've read King of Scars by Lee Mardugo where the side character of Nikolai Lansov from the Grisha trilogy is now centered as the main character and from his perspective and that didn't really work out so good. And also Nikolai wasn't actually in it that much for a book about Nikolai. And so Ronin Lynch is once it is kind of the Nikolai here where like he's not actually in it that much for a book about Ronin and it kind of taking Ronin out of The Raven Cycle and focusing on him alone kind of takes away some of the magic. He kind of works better as a counterpoint to the other characters. The same problem with Jack Sparrow where like he works as like a side character in small doses that is juxtaposed against the more like normal main characters. And when you just focus on Jack Sparrow when you just focus on Nikolai when you just focus on Ronin well for one of these books, King of Scars and this one doesn't actually focus that much on them but even so focusing the book on them kind of takes away some of the fun enigma of them because that's kind of what makes everybody love those characters because they'd be kind of wild card characters that show up and cause chaos. So I liked it. I enjoyed especially the parts with Ronin and the ending, by the ending I was like started to be more interested in and into it. So I'm definitely gonna read the next one because a lot of this book is set up because we're not in The Raven Cycle anymore so we have to set up a whole new situation kind of catch us up on where the characters are now what they're up to and like what the new big bad is gonna be what this whole thing is gonna be about. And so there's just like a lot of setup and introducing you to new characters that now Ronin is gonna be interacting with cause we don't have the Raven Cycle crew anymore and by the end of the book, like the plot lines that we were seeing the different POVs we were seeing were kind of converging. So by the end of this book everything has kind of converged and I feel like the next book which is considerably shorter will be tighter and it will not be so all over the place introducing you to stuff we can now just kind of focus on the story and ideally Ronin. So I'll let you know how that goes when I read it but yeah, Jess will not be reading the next book with me and I don't blame her. I still don't honestly know how I got her to read Telldown the Hawk. I don't even feel like I made her. I don't feel like I tricked her. I just, I don't know how this happened. I had a great time reading with her but I don't know how, how, yeah, anyway. So yeah, I thought it was good. The Raven Cycle is better. Next up, I almost said next up I read. Next up I have Malibu Rising by Taylor Jenkins Reid. I love this. I don't think I liked it as much as the seven husbands of Evelyn Hugo or Daisy Janssen six. I heard a lot of people say they didn't like it as much but I heard more so people being like, oh, it's not nearly as good versus me. I'm like, I don't think it was as good as those but it's still real. I definitely gave this five stars. And once, I mean, picking it up, I was like, I'm only picking this up because it's Taylor Jenkins Reid. Like the, I wouldn't have picked up a book about a Hollywood star like except that everyone said, Starlet, a Hollywood star except that everyone said seven husbands was like the most amazing book ever. And then after that I was like, okay, well, this is a great author. So Daisy Janssen six. I mean, I'm slightly more interested in rock stars but I still probably wouldn't pick that up but Taylor Jenkins Reid wrote it so I will read it and it was great. And Malibu Rising about like people in Malibu like by the sea surfing and whatnot. I was like, I have a zero interest in that but it's written by Taylor Jenkins Reid. So if anyone can make me interested in that, it's her and she did and it was great. And it was fantastic. It's so many feelings. She's just so good and making you feel feelings about characters and so quickly too. When I was reading this and I was just thinking about the way that much longer books like by the end, I still don't feel like I know the characters in here. There are a lot of characters to get to know and they all just feel like messy, complicated, three-dimensional characters, every single one of them.  So just wowza, she just packs a punch. So in general, like everything I've read from her so far has been amazing. I know she has some backwards books of people who they aren't as good. But I can't imagine they're all that terrible because man, this woman can write. I highly recommend. Next up I have The Forever King by Ben Galley or Galey. This was sent to me by the author for a few. So thank you very much. And this is a spin-off series from his original series or takes place in the same universe. I have not read that series, although I do own the first book. It's called The Written. So this is the Scalucin Chronicles and they take place in the world of Emanesca. Is that, am I saying that right? Yes, Emanesca. This is a very, very long book. Where's the original? It's not that long at all. And I feel very mixed about this. There are things about it that I really liked and things about it that I really didn't care about at all. But I've come to realize something about myself after having read this and after having read a few other books. And this is a me thing, not the books thing, but I really actually don't like stories where like Norse gods or really any gods, but in particular Norse gods are interacting with people as like active participants in the story. I like Norse mythology, like where it's just about the gods. And I love stories about Vikings, but like stories about people, fantasy, Vikings, whatever, where the gods are playing an active role, like showing up and doing things and talking. And they're like active players and what's going on rather than like something the characters refer to as like, oh, you know, but what is it? Does Odin will it where they're just kind of like, that's their faith? Or again, a retelling of the myths themselves. But I don't really like it when it's in between, when they're active participants in like real world events, like characters. I don't like it. And that a lot of books do that. And I've just come to realize that like, it's not the books fault. I just don't like that. This isn't actually Vikings, like this is a fantasy world where the gods are very Norse inspired. We'd also kind of like threw me for a loop where I'm like, it's not actually taking place in Scandinavia, it's taking place in this fantasy world that there's a god named Loki, who's like a trickster god. His name is literally Loki. He's not like inspired by Loki, it's Loki. So like stuff like that, like I just already wouldn't like, Loki interacting with Vikings, even if they are like in Scandinavia. So anyway, like that's just a me thing. So if you're into that, there's a lot of gods interacting with people here. I just, I don't know why, I don't like that. And so there was a lot of like, this is the first book in a new series. And similar to Call Down the Hawk, I feel like this is probably doing a lot to set up what's to come and like explain who the new players are since the first series, because I mean, I haven't read the first series, but I'm presumably like some status quo which changed by the end of that series and character. Now we need like a fresh batch of characters and a fresh situation to be dealing with. So I had to catch us up on that.  So yeah, it's a lot of setup. There's things that like basically the thing that I liked the best about this was the writing itself, because while I felt like it was kind of info don't be at times. And again, doing a lot to catch you up. So like that kind of throws off the pacing and also just being irritated with gods showing up because I personally don't like that. But there are definitely like parts multiple times when like the way something was phrased, I was just like, oh, I like that. Ooh, I like that. That's a really cool metaphor. I really like that the way he phrased that. So the writing itself kept me kind of going, ooh. But the story, it just like wasn't my jam for the aforementioned reasons. So I recommend it if you like that kind of thing. It's more than I just don't. It's a lot of the books fall. And so I previously I read Northern Math by Till Coldholt and it also does that. And I realized, cause I was trying to realize this is a Viking book, why don't I love this? I'm so upset, I wanted to love this Viking book. And I realized it was like mainly me being irritated with gods showing up and being active participants in a story about Vikings. I apparently don't like that. So anyway, yeah, so retroactively Northern Math, like I guess I recommend it if you like gods interacting with people. Same Z's for the Forever King. If you like gods interacting with people in like a Viking fantasy world, then this will be your jam for sure. Anyway, thanks to the author for sending it to me. Very much appreciate it. And I had just have to shout out how I love the cover art, all the books in the M&SK series. They all have this style of cover and I just really like the style of cover. So just a shout out to whoever designed this cover. Next up, I have A Little Hatred by Joabra Crumpy which is of course a reread. This is my third, yeah, my third time reading it cause I read it when I came out. Then I reread it before Trouble with Peace came out. And now I reread it again in anticipation of the race of wisdom of crowds. And it's just so good. And this is my first time reading it since having read The Trouble with Peace. And it was fun rereading it for that reason because now that I have like the first two times that I read it, I had not read anything that comes after. So now having read Trouble with Peace and now I'm coming back to this again, there are definitely things that are recontextualized by the information that you get in Trouble with Peace. So I highly recommend if you've been reading these books and you're all caught up to go back and read this if you haven't after reading Trouble with Peace because there's just a lot of scenes, a lot of moments of dialogue. They're kind of, he's really good at just slipping it under your radar, just like in the first original trilogy where if you go back and reread the trilogy after you finished it, so many scenes take on new life because of your new information. So similarly here, after reading Trouble with Peace, there's a lot of moments where you're like, oh my God. I didn't even notice that that was going on. And now I'm like, how could I not have noticed that? I mean, of course you didn't notice it because you didn't know to look for it. It was already an amazing book on my favorite Abercrombie book one I read it the first two times. And I mean Trouble with Peace dethroned it, but also it's still amazing like it always was, but also now like fresh perspective from the new book. So I am honestly really excited after I read Wisdom of Crowds, which like it's gonna be good, right? Like there's just like no doubt it's gonna be good. And I think I'm gonna want to pretty much immediately re-read the trilogy with that fresh perspective that I'm sure I will get from the Wisdom of Crowds. So anyway, needless to say, love this book. That is no surprise. So highly recommend to Abercrombie in the first law series. Next up I have Fable by Adrienne Young, which I've been meaning to read since it came out because honestly this cover, this cover and it has a seafaring story. So I was last year I thought it was a summer read and this year I thought it was a summer read and it was fine. I just, it wasn't very interesting. And I mean, a lot of people have said is kind of just more like a people story, just kind of a slow burn story about this young girl. And it is, I just don't think this young girl is very interesting and I don't think any of the side characters are very interesting. So I don't really mind a slow pace story that is more character driven than plot driven. I just, with that comes interesting characters. Otherwise like, why are we here? So it wasn't a very exciting plot. It did have like, it sort of attempted to kind of have like political machinations between kind of like seafaring, piratey kind of peoples. But it just like, it wasn't all that complex. And then the main character, Fable, is just kind of boring.  Don't think I'll be reading namesake because I've heard that it's not even as good as Fable. I didn't love Fable, so. It wasn't bad. And if you really connect with the character of Fable you probably enjoy it. But Fable was just, just wasn't very interesting. Along the back gripping, immersive and absolutely masterful. Disagree. It's just, it's fine. Next up I have The Lesser Devil and we may as well at the same time. Talking about The Demon in White, both of which are by Christopher Rockio and these are books in the Sun Eater series. This is the third book in the Sun Eater series and this is a novella that takes place kind of in the midst of the events of the first book. So it's a different perspective, but like timeline wise it takes place kind of during the first book. So Alex Nieves and I caught up on the Sun Eater series so there's a live show back to my channel on these two books where we discuss them at length in depth. We remain big fans of the series. We highly recommend it. We just kind of gush about it every time we talk about it. And the novella is also very good. Christopher Rockio is just a really good writer. It's an epic space opera that is wild and takes so many unexpected twists and turns. It's a very smart series. There's so many references, so many illusions, that you don't have to know what it's alluding to or paying homage to to appreciate the book. But if you do, it's just an added level of enjoyment. And yeah, it's absolutely new favorite series for sure. So if you like space operas that are like complex and epic and are written very well, then I highly recommend the Sun Eater series. And as does Alex, you can trust us. We both agree on this. Next up I have only two left. The Unbroken by C.L. Clark. This is the Blades and Bodice Rippers book club thing for August. It was Bethany's pick, so the live show for it was on Bethany's channel. And I did not like this book. Surprise. Again, we went in depth into why we, some of us liked it, some of us didn't like it because we were kind of split on this one. It wasn't like all of us hated it. Or it wasn't like all of them liked it and I hated it, which also happens a lot. Me and Mara were pretty lukewarm on this. And then Bethany and Amanda really liked it. If you want to see a spectrum of opinion on this, that's available to you on Bethany's channel. But suffice to say, I felt like this was a lot of wasted potential. Like the project of this book, the conceit of it, the type of thing that it aspires to be is the type of thing that I would very much like to see well executed. I just don't think it was well executed. So I was both not enjoying the book and also very frustrated that something, that's such a good idea is being done such disservice in my opinion. Cause I don't think the writing's very good. I don't like the plotting was very good. I don't like the characterizations very good. I don't think that the pacing is good. Basically the one thing that's good about this is the idea, the concept. And then I just, everything else about it was like, I do not plan to continue with this series unless for some reason I hear somebody who felt exactly like I did about this book and they for some reason picked up the second book and they say, oh, but it's actually like everything is fixed and this is so good. I might pick it up, but that seems unlikely. But I'm also not especially interested in anything else by this author because the thing about this that I was interested in is the concept. And what I've seen is that this author's writing, nothing about it works for me. So it's not a situation where like usually if I'm willing to try something by another author, it's usually because I liked their style. I'm just not drawn to what they're doing with that book. So I'd like to see them write something else. This is the opposite situation. I like this concept. I don't think that writing is very good. So why would I want to pick up another book by an author when I didn't like anything about their writing? I feel like I'm being really harsh, but I mean, I really didn't care about this book at all. I don't, I don't like it. So yeah, that's my take on the Unbroken. And last but certainly not least, and also not last in terms of when I read it, I read it pretty early in the month, is The Neverware by Neil Gaiman, which is a reread. The Neverware was the patient buddy read. So we chatted about it throughout and also at the end when we'd all read it. And it's, it's not my favorite Gaiman. I always feel like a traitor, like a fake fan because I feel like Neverware is very beloved. And I just, I basically, I feel like it suffers from its origins because it was originally written for television and it was then translated into novel form by the author or everything that he wanted to put in, it was put back in. But nevertheless, it being written for television by necessity, it has a very sort of episodic style, which just like it never gets a flow. It doesn't really have an arc. The main character isn't much of a main character. He's just kind of like your eyes into this world. So it's just kind of like stuff happening and stuff happening. So it never like grips me into this story. It's just kind of, yeah. So honestly, I feel like it would make a really good TV show, but not the TV show that they make because I've tried watching it and it's awful. Partly because it's dated and partly because of everything they cut out, but like the effects for back when it was made, it's like, oh no. I would like now that they're doing new Gaiman adaptations, like Good Omens on Amazon or American Gods when off the rails, but the production quality is certainly up there with American Gods. So something with that level of production quality with Neil Gaiman at the helm, I would love to see them like it went from TV to book and I want it to be back into TV, but this time with everything in it. And ideally produced by somebody with a big budget so that we get all the great effects and everything. Cause a lot of this like, I feel like it works. It's also written feelingly like it's for the screen, which I was. Where like a lot of the scenes you're like, ah, I don't know what's this narrative purpose this serves, it feels like it was written to have a visually cool scene, which for TV, you need to think about that. I didn't know book, you're like, okay. So there's a lot of things about Neverwhere that I do like. I used to get horse dars. There's a lot of quirks in the writing. There's a lot of pieces to the world of Neverwhere to the world of London below that are really cool, that are clever, that are unique, that are quintessentially Gaiman, but it just, I feel like it's a little bit of a mess in terms of like the structure and pacing, which I think is the result of how it was originally conceived, like the fact that it was for television. So it's kind of not, it's fault, but anyway, Neverwhere. Yeah, that does it for all the books that I read in August. Let me know in the comments down below if you've read any of the books that I read, if you plan to read any of the books that I read, if you agree or disagree with me about the books that I talked about, if you have read them, whatever you wanna let me know. I post videos on Saturdays, other random times as well, but I think Saturdays, so like and subscribe. Join my Patreon to feel so inclined and I'll see you when I see you. Bye.


Hey everyone, it's Gabrielle over here today at Oxmore Toyota for our pre-owned vehicles of the week We have three certified pre-owned Toyotas that we are going to share with you So let's go ahead and start with this one. This is a Highlander So this is a 2019 Toyota Highlander. It's an XLE the exterior color is in a black Now for this one you are going to have 18 inch alloy wheels. There's going to be a power lift gate. There's going to be a backup camera. You're going to have a Sunroof Now the mileage on here is 42,538 The price is 42,000 Our second vehicle is a 2021 Toyota Tacoma SR5. This is a V6 The exterior color is in a gray There is 16 inch alloy wheels You're going to have Predator steps on here There's going to be six speakers You're going to have a backup camera. That interior isn't a black cloth. There is red accents Mileage is 10,917. The price is 46,926 Our last vehicle is a 2021 Toyota Sequoia Limited that exterior color is in a super white This vehicle is going to have alloy wheels. You're going to have a power lift gate There's going to be a power sunroof. There's a spoiler. So you are going to have 12 speakers throughout there's going to be navigation backup camera that interior isn't a graphite leather Mileage is 1703 the price is 72,474 All right, you all if you have any questions on any one of these three certified pre-owned Toyotas feel free to let us know all of our contact info is listed right here Thanks you all so much for watching and we'll see you soon. Bye


is a statement by Nicola Sturgeon on Covid-19 update. The First Minister will take questions at the end of her statement, and so there should be no interventions or interruptions. Thank you, Presiding Officer. I'll give an update today on the latest Covid situation and also provide an assessment of the current course of the pandemic. First, today's statistics, 2,771 positive cases were reported yesterday, 12.8% of all the tests that were carried out. 779 people are currently in hospital with Covid, which is eight more than yesterday, and 57 people are receiving intensive care, which is the same number as yesterday. Sadly, a further 17 deaths have been reported over the past 24 hours, and that takes the total number of deaths under this daily definition to 9,406. Again, I want to send my condolences to everyone who has lost a loved one. More positively, the vaccination programme continues to make very good progress. I can confirm that 4,331,574 people have received the first dose, and 3,930,317 have now had both doses. In total, 88% of all those over 18 are now fully vaccinated with two doses. In addition, 76% of 16 and 17-year-olds and 56% of 12 to 15-year-olds have had a first dose. Until now, of course, only a single dose has been recommended for these age groups, but following yesterday's updated advice from the JCVI, we are now preparing to offer second doses to 16 and 17-year-olds. I will say a bit more about the progress of the booster programme later. However, it is worth pointing out that, on first, second and booster and third doses, Scotland is currently the most vaccinated part of the UK. That is down, of course, to the incredible hard work of everyone involved in organising and delivering the programme, and I want to record my thanks to each and every one of them. Today's weekly update coincides with the latest three-week review point for the remaining Covid regulations. I can confirm that at our meeting earlier today. The Cabinet agreed to keep the current regulations in place with no immediate changes. However, we also considered, though we have not yet reached final decisions, the possibility of future changes to the Covid certification scheme, and I will say more about that shortly as well. The numbers reported in recent days here in Scotland, which I will come on to talk about in more detail, illustrate the need for continued precautions. So, too, does the challenging situation being experienced again across Europe. Several European countries are currently dealing with a sharp increase in cases. Infection rates in Germany have reached their highest level since the pandemic started. The Netherlands reintroduced some Covid measures last week. Ireland has done so today, and Austria has just introduced extremely tough restrictions on people who are not fully vaccinated. All of that is a reminder that Governments everywhere are grappling with the same issues and dilemmas that we are. The threats posed by Covid are very much still with us, even though they have been mitigated by vaccination and the race between the virus and the vaccines has not yet been won. The situation here in Scotland also bears that out. However, before I give an update on the overall trends in Scotland, I want to say a few words about the impact of recent events in Glasgow. I will reflect more generally on COP26 in a further statement to Parliament later this afternoon. However, while we cannot yet draw final conclusions, I can confirm now that there is no sign so far of any significant spike in Covid cases associated with COP26. Rigorous measures were put in place to minimise the risks of transmission. For example, anyone entering the main summit site, the blue zone, had to provide evidence of a negative lateral flow test result. Information published earlier today by Public Health Scotland suggests that of the people officially affiliated with COP26, approximately four in every 1,000 tested positive for Covid through routine lateral flow testing. That contrasts with survey data for the Scottish population as a whole, which suggests that, last week, 12 people in every 1,000 had Covid. In total, since 15 October, 291 people with Covid across Scotland reported attending a COP-related event. That includes satellite meetings and demonstrations, as well as the main summit itself. That represents less than half of 1 per cent of all those who tested positive for Covid over the past month and reported through test and protect. All of that at this stage suggests that the medications that were put in place for COP were effective. I want to put on record my thanks to delegates for their compliance and indeed to everyone who worked so hard in the run-up to and during COP26 to secure the safest possible environment. More generally across Scotland, we have seen a gradual increase in cases over the past two weeks from just over 2,500 new cases a day to approximately 3,000 cases a day at this stage. It is important to note, though, that this headline figure masks some distinct variation between different age groups. For example, cases among under 60s increased by 14 per cent during the past week, and much of that increase was in people under the age of 20. By contrast, cases in the over 60 age group fell over the past week by 11 per cent. That is likely to be due, at least in part, to the success of the booster programme, which, of course, is prioritised among the older population. I will say more about that shortly. The decline in cases among older people may also explain why, despite the overall increase in cases, the numbers in hospital with Covid have reduced slightly in recent weeks. Three weeks ago, 917 patients were in hospital with Covid. Today, there are 779, and the number in intensive care has also fallen, although very slightly, during that time from 59 to 57. However, all of that said, the number of patients in hospital with Covid is still extremely high. If cases continue to increase, then notwithstanding the age profile, we are likely to see hospital admissions and occupancy start to rise again. In addition, the NHS is currently treating people who are in hospital for care, which had to be delayed by earlier Covid countermeasures. Of course, as we go further into winter, we can expect other seasonal pressures, for example, to increase. All of that means that the NHS is under extreme pressure, and we continue to work closely with health boards to address and mitigate those pressures as far as we can. The vaccination programme continues to be critical in reducing the direct health harm caused by the virus. I mentioned a moment ago that the decline in Covid rates in older age groups and the fall in hospital admissions may well reflect the impact of the vaccine booster campaign. I can confirm that more than 1 million boosterjags have now been administered, and over 70 per cent of the over-70 age group have now had a booster. We know that a boosterjag significantly increases the effectiveness of the vaccine, so this high level of uptake is extremely important, and we will continue to push it up as far as possible. The programme took a further step forward yesterday with the launch of the online booking portal, everyone aged 50 to 59, together with unpaid carers and household contacts of the immunosuppressed and anyone eligible for a vaccine who has not yet had an appointment can now book online at NHS Inform. Since yesterday morning, more than 54,000 people have made online bookings, and more than 8,000 people have made bookings through the national helpline, which can be called on 0800 0300 8013. That is 0800 030 8013. It is, of course, important to remember that boosters can only be given 24 weeks after someone's second jab, therefore for many in the 50 to 59 age group appointments will only be possible from December onwards. It is also worth pointing out that people living in Orkney, Shetland, the Western Isles and the NHS Highland health board areas will not use the online booking system but instead receive information direct from their health board about local appointment arrangements. As I mentioned earlier, the JCVI updated its advice yesterday. In addition to recommended second doses for 16 and 17-year-olds, it also recommended booster jags for people in their 40s. I very much welcome this and the Scottish Government will now move to implement this new advice as quickly as we can. We continue to work with health boards to ensure that the overall programme is delivered as rapidly as possible. However, it is worth taking stock of the situation as of now. This winter vaccination programme is the largest and the most complex ever undertaken in Scotland. However, since the first week in September, more than 3 million flu and booster jags have been administered, take-up rates have been encouraging and this is providing vital protection as we head into winter. Once again, I am hugely grateful to everyone for helping to get jags into people's arms as quickly as possible. I also want to take this opportunity again to urge every single person who is eligible for vaccination, whether for a first or second or a booster or third jag, to please take up the offer without delay and get the flu jag too if you are eligible. Getting vaccinated remains the single most important thing that any of us can do to protect ourselves, our loved ones and our communities. It is impossible to overstate how important it is to get vaccinated, so if you have not already, please do so now. You could be saving your own life or the lives of your loved ones. You will be reassuring others, including those most at risk, some of whom have clinical conditions that mean that they cannot get vaccinated themselves. You will be helping those working in the NHS and maximising our collective chances of getting through this winter without the need to reintroduce any restrictions. In my view, choosing without good reason not to be vaccinated is deeply irresponsible. Getting vaccinated on the other hand is a civic duty and it is the most precious gift that we can give to others at this time. The vaccine programme is and will continue to be the bedrock of our efforts to control Covid. However, other baseline mitigations remain in place and they are also important. Lateral flow testing, as I mentioned earlier, appears to have been effective in limiting transmission during COP. That should remind all of us that these tests are a really important way of detecting infection, particularly in those without symptoms and therefore preventing onward spread. I would again encourage everyone to do a lateral flow test at least twice a week and especially if you are attending events or mixing with people in other households. The tests can be ordered free through NHS Inform or collected from test sites and local pharmacies. Face coverings also continue to be a simple but important mitigation and remain a legal requirement on public transport in shops and when moving around in hospitality settings. Please also continue to work from home when that is practical. I am today asking all employers to look again at whether more workers could be supported to do more work from home over the winter period. Lastly, good ventilation is vital. If any of us are having people visit our homes, we should open a window even slightly to let some air flow through the room. Within the public sector, we have taken significant steps to improve ventilation, for example funding for carbon dioxide monitors in schools. In September, we announced the establishment of a £25 million fund to help businesses improve ventilation. The fund opens for applications next week. Businesses such as restaurants, bars and gyms will be able to claim back costs of up to £2,500 for measures such as the installation of carbon dioxide monitors or improvements to windows and vents. More information on eligibility has been published today on the Find Business Support website. All of these basic mitigation measures are really important at this stage, but some of them are also valuable long-term investments. For example, better ventilation will not just reduce the spread of Covid, it will also help to reduce the spread of other airborne viruses now and in the future. There is an important point here that is worth stressing. When we talk as many do these days about living with Covid, it is important that we do not think of this as simply giving in to the virus. Instead, it is about making sensible changes that allow us to return both to greater normality and to better health. The final mitigation measure that I want to talk about today is the Covid certification scheme. It is the strong view of the Scottish Government that this, together with the other measures still in place, makes an important and proportionate contribution to stemming Covid transmission. The value of certification is also recognised in other countries, many of which require certification for access to a much wider range of services than is currently the case in Scotland. Wales, for example, expanded the scope of its own scheme yesterday. It now applies to theatres, cinemas and concert halls in addition to the same range of venues as in Scotland. The cabinet discussed possible changes to the current certification scheme at our meeting this morning. We intend to take a final decision next Tuesday in light of the most up-to-date data. In the meantime, later this week, we will publish an evidence paper and consult businesses on the practicalities of implementation should any changes be made. However, while final decisions have not yet been reached, I want to provide an update on the issues under consideration. I should also say that we would provisionally intend for any changes that we decide to make to the scheme to take effect from December 6. When the scheme launched on 1 October, we judged that it was not appropriate at that time, given the imperative to drive up vaccination rates to include testing as an alternative to proof of vaccination, but we indicated that that would be kept under review. We will assess in the coming days whether, on the basis of current and projected vaccination uptake rates, we are now in a position to amend the scheme so that, in addition to showing evidence of vaccination to access a venue, there will also be the option of providing evidence of a recent negative test result. That is already a feature, of course, of many other countries' certification schemes. We are also considering whether an expansion of the scheme to cover more settings would be justified and prudent given the current state of the pandemic. Again, let me stress that we have not, at this stage, taken a decision to extend the reach of the scheme. However, to allow us to engage openly with businesses in the coming days about the pros, cons and practicalities, I can confirm that the kinds of settings that might be in scope would be indoor cinemas, theatres and some other licensed and hospitality premises. We would, of course, retain exemptions for those under 18, for those who cannot be vaccinated or tested for medical reasons, for people on clinical trials and for those who work at events or in venues subject to the scheme. Exceptions would also be retained for worship, weddings, funerals and related gatherings. I will give a further update on that in next week's statement, and if we decide to propose any amendments to the regulations on certification, Parliament will have the opportunity to discuss and debate those amendments. I am acutely aware that many businesses want us to remove mitigations, including certification, not extend or tighten them. I understand that, but all of our decisions are and must be motivated by a desire to keep people safe, but also to get through what will be a challenging winter without having to reintroduce any restrictions on trade. We want, if possible, businesses to stay fully open over Christmas and through the winter, while also keeping Covid under control. If an expansion of Covid certification can help us to do that, it would be irresponsible not to consider it. As the detail of this statement makes clear and as the situation across Europe also shows, the need to carefully manage this pandemic still deprives us of any easy options. We hope very much to get through winter without reintroducing any further restrictions, as some other countries are now starting to do. We have a duty to keep proportionate options under review and we will do so. To assist with and give an insight into the factors guiding our considerations, we are also publishing an updated strategic framework today. This covers, in more detail, many of the issues that I have already summarised. One of the points that it reiterates is that all of us across society—individuals, businesses and other organisations—must continue to play our part in helping to curb the spread of the virus. For that reason, cabinet secretaries are continuing to work with COSLA, individual local authorities and businesses on the actions that we need to take to reduce transmission, preferably without additional restrictions. I will close again by reiterating what we can all do to protect ourselves and each other. First, please get vaccinated if you are eligible and have not yet done so. As I mentioned earlier, that includes going for a booster jag when you are invited. It is never too late to get vaccinated and it remains the single most important thing that any of us can do right now. Second, please test regularly with lateral flow devices. Those, of course, can be ordered through NHS Inform or collected from local test sites or pharmacies. If you test positive or are identified as a close contact or have symptoms of the virus, please self-isolate and book a PCR test. Third, please comply with the mitigation still in place. Work from home when that is possible. We face coverings and indoor public places, shops, public transport and moving around in hospitality. Wash hands and surfaces thoroughly and meet outdoors if that is possible. That obviously gets harder through the winter, but it is the case that outdoor environments are safer than indoors. When you are meeting indoors, try to open windows. Anything to improve ventilation will help. All of those precautions do still make a difference. They will protect us and those around us, and they will help to ease the burden on our NHS. I ask everyone to continue to stick with them and thank everyone for doing so. The First Minister will now take questions on the issues raised in her statement. I intend to allow around 40 minutes for questions after which we will move on to the next item of business, and I would be grateful if members who wish to ask a question were to press their request to speak buttons now, and I call Douglas Ross. It is vital that everyone who can have a Covid jag goes out and gets it as soon as possible. The vaccine, including the booster jag, is our best weapon against this virus, and that is why we have called for the reopening of mass vaccination centres. That will ensure that, alongside the current local delivery programme, we maximise the opportunities for people to get their vaccine booster. Will the First Minister agree to reopen those mass vaccination centres so that we can speed up the booster jag roll-out and help to protect people quicker? Today, the public was expecting a statement that delivered clear decisions. We all were. That was the message that the Deputy First Minister was sent out to give this Parliament last week. Instead, we are being told once more to wait until next week. The Government has delayed again, creating wholly avoidable uncertainty. Businesses are once again being left in the dark and treated as an afterthought. They might have less than two weeks to adapt to changes to the vaccine passport scheme at one of the busiest times of the year for the hospitality industry, and that has a big impact on their staff as well. It is a total lack of respect for Scottish businesses who the SNP expect to shoulder the costs of their vaccine passport scheme. The Deputy First Minister said last Tuesday that this Government would discuss options with businesses over the course of this week. Can the First Minister give a clear answer and tell us the outcome of those discussions over the past week? The Government must know who might be impacted. Let me ask the First Minister the same question that I asked the Deputy First Minister last week. Exactly which businesses are the Government still considering expanding the vaccine passport scheme to because she mentioned some other hospitality venues? Which hospitality venues have to prepare for this added burden? Finally, the First Minister has just said that we want if possible businesses to stay fully open over Christmas. We know that the Government wants to keep options open, but will the First Minister be clear to Scottish businesses and the jobs that depend on them? Does that statement mean that the SNP Government is considering closing businesses and premises over the winter months? It pains me to say this, but the immaturity and irresponsibility of Douglas Ross in the face of this virus continues to be utterly breathtaking. I know that he has had other things in his mind in recent days, but is he oblivious to what is currently happening across Europe where this virus is on the rise again and Governments everywhere are once again having to grapple with the most difficult decisions. We are seeking to do that in a responsible way. That is what we have done throughout and we will continue to do that in the period ahead. Two issues were raised in particular, one-on vaccination. We are organising the vaccination programme in this phase in the way that makes the best use of resources and vaccinates people as quickly as possible. One of the things that I have learned in recent weeks is that whatever we decide to do, Douglas Ross will probably oppose it. When we introduced a vaccination programme for younger teenagers that was not principally school-based, that was criticised, but then it turned out that we managed to vaccinate those younger teachers and teenagers quicker than any other part of the UK. Across every single dose of this vaccine right now, Scotland is the most vaccinated part of the UK. We are not complacent about that. We continue to press to speed this up every single day, but this vaccination programme is going extremely well. Perhaps once in a while, Douglas Ross could find it within himself to thank those who are working so hard across the country to make sure that people are vaccinated. On the issue of Covid certification, it is simply not an option right now for any Government across Europe or much of the world to do nothing in the face of this virus. The easiest thing, of course, is to oppose everything that Governments decide to do to try to keep people safe. If I had—Douglas Ross bemoans the fact that Cabinet has not taken a final decision yet—if I had stood up here today and said that we had taken a final decision to expand the reach of the certification scheme, he would have criticised that, of course, and said that we were acting too quickly that we weren't taking account of the up-to-date data. We have decided to consider this carefully to take account of the up-to-date data and reach a decision next week. In the meantime, we will publish an evidence paper and we will consult with businesses on the practicalities and the pros and cons. We will decide which businesses are on the basis of the data and the evidence. I have set out today, in order to give people an update on what we are considering, the sectors that we are considering, and people will only have to look around the UK, Wales right now, Ireland, which is extending its Covid certification, and many countries across Europe to see that most Governments are grappling with those same difficult decisions. The easiest thing in the world right now, as Douglas Ross has found out, is to oppose everything. However, when you have a duty, as Government does, to try to keep people safe, then the decisions are harder than that and we will continue to take them with an intense degree of responsibility. I would like to start by offering my condolences to all those who have lost a loved one and to recognise those who continue to put every effort into their front line and keep us all safe. I urge the Government to do more than just applaud them and thank them, recognise and reward them too when they come forward with their own pay disputes. The Government has still not fixed the tools that it already has and is now instead looking at expanding a system that the Deputy First Minister himself said that he had no evidence that it was reducing cases of Covid. The vaccine works, it reduces hospitalisations, it reduces death rates, it reduces cases of long Covid, but it does not stop you from getting the virus and it does not stop you from spreading the virus. The First Minister in her statement said that lateral flow testing helped to reduce transmission at COP. She has been arguing the opposite in relation to the vaccine passport scheme. At every point in the process of developing vaccine passports, we have argued the importance of a negative test. In fact, every single scheme that the First Minister quoted in her statement and in her response includes the use of a negative test. In the coming week, except you got it wrong, admit that testing should always have been at the heart of our Covid reduction strategy and commit today to including a negative test in any reformed or expanded scheme, to meaningfully engage with the sector's impact, to share the evidence, to consider the practicalities and to provide financial packages that stop businesses going under and people losing their jobs. On reward for those who work so hard in our national health service, I would dearly love to be in a position to give a higher pay rise than we have and we will always seek to maximise that. However, it is important to put on record that NHS workers in Scotland, agenda for change workers, are receiving this year the highest pay increase of any NHS workers in any part of the UK, including where labour is in government. Perhaps we should judge on what they do, not just on what they say. On the issue of the vaccine certification scheme and the inclusion of a negative test, this is a finely balanced judgment. When we have taken a decision to introduce a scheme with the express objective of using it, at least in part, to drive up vaccination rates, it makes no sense to have an alternative to vaccine initially as part of that scheme, because then we would not have seen an argument here that one of the reasons why we are currently the most vaccinated part of the UK is that, at least in part, our vaccine certification scheme has helped to drive vaccine uptake. There comes a point where your consideration changes because you make a judgment that we have already got all of the gains of increased vaccine uptake and therefore we can move to include LFD tests. I understand the importance of LFD tests as part of a package of measures, that is why every week when I stand here I talk about the importance of them. We have taken careful judgments up until now. We will not always get these judgments right, but we will continue to take them responsibly and take account of all the evidence that we will. As I said in my statement, I published an evidence paper this week. We will continue to talk to businesses and we will continue to arrive at these very difficult decisions as carefully as we possibly can. I know that, for the Opposition here, they wanted to say that we just need to do nothing and that everything that we put forward is opposed. That is an easy option, but when you are in government there are no easy options, particularly in the face of a global pandemic. If any proof was needed that vaccine certification is unnecessary and there are better alternatives, it can be found at COP26. The First Minister just said herself that it was the safest possible environment. With using daily LFTs, attendees were three times less likely to test positive for Covid-19 than the general population where vaccine certification is at large. We know that LFTs are superior to vaccine passports in two significant ways. First, they provide an on-the-day snapshot of your Covid status rather than your vaccine status, which helps venues to ascertain who is sick and who is well. Secondly, perhaps most importantly, it prevents the need for you to pass part of your medical history or evidence of recent treatment to somebody who is not your clinician. A mixed bag or a combination of those two schemes will not cut it. Will the First Minister abandon vaccine certification entirely and build a scheme that is built entirely around lateral flow testing? I will not, because my duty to try to keep the population of Scotland as safe as possible means that I cannot just take the easy options that I let go Hamilton might put forward. I think that he misunderstands the package of mitigations that were in place around COP26, where part of the protections that delegates were asked to be double vaccinated before they arrived. We offered vaccination to people who were coming from countries where that was not available. LFD tests, of course, were an additional precaution over and above that. It is easy to be selective, but it is perhaps better to look at the whole package of measures that were in place. On the wider issue here, when you have a scheme that is partly about driving up vaccination rates, it makes no sense to give an alternative to vaccine because then you undermine the objective of your scheme. It is really important that vaccines have limitations, although they are hugely effective. LFD tests are effective but also have limitations. We need to use all of those tools at our disposal to drive rates down as far as possible and to keep people as safe as possible. That is the obligation and the responsibility that this Government will continue to take seriously, even when it means unpopular decisions every single day that we are in this pandemic. Annabelle Ewing, to be followed by Murdo Fraser. A significant continuing impact of the Covid pandemic has been the restriction on face-to-face meetings with GPs, which is impacting on people across my Cowdenbeath constituency and, indeed, across Scotland. Can the First Minister therefore advise as to what steps are being taken to improve patient access to GPs and whether the need for the current two-meter infection control requirement in healthcare settings will be kept under review? Our recovery plan includes working with GPs to restore face-to-face consultations in surgeries. Public Health Scotland has already published updated guidance for primary care settings, covering key issues such as physical distancing, which is now one metre or not to access for patients and wider infection prevention and control. This will be kept under review. We aspire to return to a greater availability of face-to-face appointments, however, a number of patients will wish to continue with phone or video consultations. We are clinically necessary. The option to have a face-to-face consultation should always be available. Our winter funding package will help to increase NHS and social care capacity over the winter, and that includes funding for accelerated recruitment to aid general practice. Murdo Fraser, to be followed by Eleanor Whitham. The First Minister in her statement recognised the very substantial concern that already exists in the business community about any extension of the vaccine passport scheme, when some hospitality businesses are already reporting a 40 per cent loss of trade. Now other businesses could face a similar loss of trade and additional costs in providing extra staffing with just two weeks to prepare for changes. If the Scottish Government goes down that route, will it provide a package of additional financial support for those businesses that are affected because it is already badly required? We will continue to consider additional financial support as necessary. In fact, on a different issue today, I have just announced it or confirmed additional financial support to enable businesses, including bars and restaurants, to improve ventilation. We will continue to look favourably at any argument that is made there. Murdo Fraser and others have to be very careful with the argument that, because trade is down, that is an argument against measures to make setting safer. I have spoken to many people and I appreciate that this will not be a unanimous view, but I have spoken to many people anecdotally who say that the reason they are not going back to pubs and restaurants is because they do not yet feel safe enough. If people's vaccine records were being checked, that would make them feel safer and perhaps more likely to go back. There are arguments in both directions on that. I understand how difficult it is for hospitality, tourism trade and other sectors that have been so badly affected. However, the key to getting back to normal is to firstly keep Covid under control and then build the confidence of people to start going back to normal life. We have to use every possible tool at our disposal to do that. I have had a number of constituents contacting me to raise their concerns about the lack of access to general dental practitioners for all but emergency treatment and that such treatment is often framed around minimum interventions. There have also been issues with people moving to Catcumlic and Dyn Valley and not being able to register with a dentist. Can the First Minister advise when general dental practices will resume more routine services? From early November last year, when the full range of caring treatment was made available, we have been working to increase patient access in NHS dentistry. That has included additional funding for ventilation and improved dental drills, for example. We are in discussion with the BDA to support dentists and put patients at the centre of building a sustainable NHS service. From February next year, we will bring in enhanced fees for a range of treatments, including a more comprehensive examination supporting NHS dental teams to clear the backlog in routine care that built up during the course of the pandemic. We have already provided £50 million of financial support plus an additional £35 million of PPE to ensure that dental services can emerge well-placed care for patients across Scotland. A constituent contacted me after the instructions with the lateral flow test kit advised her to record the results through an NHS Scotland website. The UK Government website sends confirmation of a result within minutes. My constituent discovered that the Scottish website can take up to 24 hours. That is useless when confirmation is required the same day as the test in order to visit loved ones in a care home. Why the wait times for the Scottish website are so long and whether there is a need for a separate Scottish system when the UK Government system works? I am genuinely more than happy to look into that in a bit more detail. The advice is for people doing LFD tests to record the result of those tests through the UK website. I have been doing that myself every day for the past couple of weeks and do it regularly, so that is the advice. I am not entirely clear exactly what website is being referred to, but if the details can be passed to me, I am happy to look into that and provide any further information and advice after I have had the opportunity to do so. I would like to ask the First Minister what government support has been given to the local authority and health and social care partnership as they have tried to mitigate any staff absences in schools, nurseries, care facilities and ensure the continued delivery of public services. I recognise the impact of the current situation in Aberdeenshire and other areas. We have made significant resources available to local authorities specifically for challenges like those narrated by Gillian Martin. In schools, for example, we have provided local government with more than £200 million of additional funding over the past two years specifically for the recruitment of more school staff to support education recovery. Aberdeenshire has received around £12 million of that funding. Our guidance for schools and early learning centres, including at home asymptomatic testing, is contributing to keeping transmission rates among staff low. In all settings, though, adherence to mitigations makes a difference and everyone has a part to play in continuing to minimise transmission. Several constituents continue to contact me about confusion around the booster roll-out in mainland Argyll and Bute, which comes under NHS Highland. People receive letters inviting them to attend vaccination centres that are either nowhere near them or don't exist at all, leading to considerable distress, particularly for older and vulnerable people who are unsure as to where and when they will receive their booster. Given the importance of the vaccine booster campaign, will the Government act immediately to sort this out? I know that officials have been talking to Argyll and Bute just in the last day or so to resolve some of the issues that have been experienced and I will ask the health secretary to write to the member with an update following those discussions. Can I ask the First Minister to provide an assurance that should it be deemed necessary to introduce further measures such as an extension of mitigations or vaccine certification to avoid the kinds of restrictions seen in Australia and the Netherlands that will be done with as much notice as possible with guidance for venues to support the implementation and continued engagement with affected sectors to understand the impact of any changes? Not with her. She's a charmer. She's the leader of the opposition. The answer is yes. We will continue to discuss with individuals, with businesses, with other sectors the very difficult options that will lie ahead of us if we continue to see Covid cases rise over the winter period. Across Europe right now, we are seeing in parts of the British Isles right now the emergence of another very challenging situation. One of the lessons that we have learned throughout this pandemic is that often we have to take very unpalatable decisions in order to stop a situation deteriorating. The earlier we act around increasing compliance, for example, with the basic mitigations in place, doing things such as improving ventilation, the more chance we have of avoiding some of the measures that we are seeing in countries such as the Netherlands, Austria and even today in Ireland much closer to home. What I would say, because this has worked in the previous peaks that we have experienced in recent weeks, if we all step up our compliance with basic mitigations, if we all recognise the vital importance of vaccination and get vaccinated as soon as we are able to do so, I hope that we will be able to get through winter without having to re-impose any further restrictions. That is the aim of the Government, but no responsible Government, absolutely no responsible Government can stand here in the face of a pandemic as we go into another winter and give empty promises on what might or might not be possible. Our solemn duty is to act in a way, however unpopular it might be, to keep the country as safe as possible, and that is what we will continue to seek to do. I have previously asked about flu vaccinations for those who are not prioritised for the Covid booster but are normally eligible for the flu vaccine. The NHS informed website gives no information about how to get your flu vaccine if you are not in one of the Covid priority groups and in an age group where the JCVI has not approved a booster. Can the First Minister lay out how those who are susceptible to flu can get their vaccine? It is possible to book a flu vaccine, as I understand it. I am going to ask the health secretary to write and put this in spice with the detail of exactly how to do that, because we want to make sure that people fully understand that. For those who are in priority groups for the booster campaign, where possible we are advising that they get the flu vaccine and their booster at the same time. It is better for them. It also allows us to get through the programme even more quickly. For those whose booster will not fall due, and I know that I am in this category until later this year, the advice is that it is safe to wait to get your flu vaccine at that time in order to get them together. Obviously, NHS informed provides further information and advice, but for those who are not in the priority categories for the booster, they are eligible for flu. Remember that there is a significant overlap between the two categories of eligibility. I will make sure that the health secretary provides some information for the benefit of constituents about how exactly flu vaccines, stand-alone flu vaccines, should be accessed. First Minister, I have been contacted by constituents who are past the six-month guidance date for their Covid-19 booster vaccination and are concerned that the efficacy of the primary vaccine dose is waning. I ask the First Minister whether the Scottish Government has received advice from clinical advisers on the efficacy of the primary vaccine protection and what reassurance can be given to those who are awaiting booster appointments, and I remind members that I am part of NHS D&G's vaccine team. The JCVI advice is that the booster vaccine should be offered no earlier than six months after the completion of the primary vaccine course, and that means no earlier than six months after the second dose that somebody has. As I have said in the chamber before, the Scottish Government is interpreting that as 24 weeks, of course. By the time that the JCVI advice was received, some people—many people—had already passed that six-month 24-week period, so we are in a catch-up situation, but that catch-up is going well and we continue to do that at pace. The advice from clinicians is that the immunity from the primary course does not suddenly fall off a cliff and end when you reach that period, but there is concern about gradual waning, so we want to get the boosters done as quickly as possible, and that is what the programme is working so hard to do, and so successfully right now to do. First Minister, my constituents are having problems accessing vaccine boosters in the passport. I have been advised to tell constituents to update their address with their old vaccination centre in England in order to have their Scottish update, when, for instance, I have one dose in England and one in Scotland, but I have also had constituents told to follow the advice for foreign vaccinations if they have been vaccinated in Northern Ireland. I have also had constituents who have been fully vaccinated in other parts of the UK, but NHS Scotland does not hold the details and now they cannot get their booster vaccines, so could the First Minister say what the Scottish Government is doing to try and fix what is a really opaque and confusing system for many of our constituents? I am happy to do that. I will ensure that the health secretary writes to the member that this is entirely my fault, but I was not sure that I was following all the particular examples that were being put to me there. It is really important that people understand what to do in all of the circumstances where they have had one dose in England and another in Scotland or where they are having their booster somewhere else, but to make sure that we give very clear information on what people should do, there is a portal, of course, where people can update their vaccine certification, but in order to make sure that I am answering that question properly and in full detail, I will do it in written form. Again, as I said in a previous answer, I have put the information in space as well. All medical advice has indicated that the transmission rate, including the number of people in hospital at the moment, is higher among those who have yet to receive the vaccine. As we head into the winter months, can the First Minister elaborate on some of the concerns that clinical advisers have on the pressures facing the NHS if the trend continues the way it is? That is an important factor in all of our considerations. The NHS, as we all know, is working under extreme pressure right now, possibly the most extreme pressure that the NHS has ever faced in its entire history. Much of that pressure does come from Covid, however the NHS is also working to catch up on the backlog of care caused by earlier restrictions. The combination of events is before we are properly into a possible flu season, means that we are likely to see significant pressure on the NHS over the whole of this winter period. What we do know is that the more Covid cases there are, the greater that pressure will be. People who are not vaccinated are at greater risk of getting the virus and becoming seriously ill from the virus, so one of the things that all of us can do to try to reduce the pressure on the NHS is to get vaccinated if we haven't already with our first and second dose and certainly when we're able to with our booster dose. If we see cases rise as we are gradually at the moment, then notwithstanding the variation in the age profile there, we are going to see hospitalisations increase as well. At a time when the pressure on the NHS is already so acute, that obviously would be a seriously concerning development. Vaccination is one of the things that all of us can do to try to ease that pressure as much as possible. Test white to be followed by Stephanie Callaghan. First Minister, the updated Covid strategic framework emphasises the importance of testing and anticipates a significantly increased demand on testing capacity this winter. Can the Scottish Government provide assurances that sufficient testing resources are in place to meet demand over the coming months? Yes, I can. We work hard every day to show that the capacity is there. We also work with the UK Government, given that much of our testing capacity—not all of it, but much of our testing capacity—is delivered through the Four Nations Lighthouse programme. Those are issues that get close attention from the health secretary, from me and from the Government as a whole every single day. Stephanie Callaghan to be followed by family Carson. To ask the First Minister whether autism is classed as a neuro-disability, and if so, will young people in the spectrum aged between 12 and 16 years old be invited for a second vaccination? The JCVI has already advised that children and young people aged 12 to 17, who are at an increased risk of severe Covid infections, should receive a full course of vaccination. That means that two-doses eligibility covers severe neuro-disabilities, which include autism, and vaccination is already being offered to this cohort. Finlay Carson to be followed by Jenny Minto. Presently, a Covid booster vaccination record is not available to those who wish to travel to certain countries, which have recently imposed a 270-day limit on post-second vaccination. That effect means that those who have received both vaccinations by spring 2021 will be denied entry to those countries despite having had the third vaccination. It is my understanding that currently NHS Scotland cannot provide evidence of a third vaccination, and that is becoming increasingly important for international travel. If that is the case, will the First Minister commit to resolving the issue as a matter of urgency? Unless I am wrong here in which case I am sure that that will be pointed out, I think that the position in Scotland is the same as it is in other parts of the UK right now. We are currently looking at how we incorporate booster vaccinations into the app and the vaccine certificate. Indeed, it is an issue that we discussed at Cabinet this morning, so steps will be taken to ensure, particularly for international travel, where we are dependent on the requirements of other countries that people are not disadvantaged and that the benefits of booster vaccines are properly reflected. I have been contacted by a constituent who will soon be travelling to Austria and, to do so, they require proof of their booster vaccination within nine months before entry. Will the First Minister expand on Covid boosters being recorded on vaccination status records on the NHS Scotland app? As I said in response to the previous question, we are committed to adding boosters to vaccine certificates and we are considering right now the steps to be taken to do that. One additional piece of information that I think it is important to point out to the chamber that currently there is no international standard on how to display booster information on vaccine certificates, so there is still work under way to develop the appropriate systems to meet those requirements. Until we have an international standard, there will be no guarantee that any solution will be accepted in all other countries. It is really important that we do that in the proper way. Of course, in the interim, any individual looking to travel should check what is needed for entry into the country that they are visiting. We will provide updates on progress with the incorporation of booster vaccines regularly and as soon as possible. On 8 November, the Scottish Government confirmed that, as of 15 October, 40,768 ventilation inspections had taken place across learning, teaching and play spaces. The First Minister has rightly confirmed the importance of ventilation. How many of those spaces failed the inspection under the Government criteria and what does the First Minister expect to happen to those spaces that failed? We have provided funding for local authorities to inspect and assess the quality of ventilation and then to take any follow-up steps. I will happily come back to the member on the detail to the extent that we have it, because this is information held by local authorities around the outcome of assessments but making sure that those assessments are done. We provided funding for carbon dioxide monitors, and I know that all local authorities have taken that very seriously to improve the quality of ventilation in schools and early learning centres. People have recently expressed their frustration at seeing the Prime Minister with no mask on in a hospital. Some have loved ones in hospital with Covid. What is the Scottish Government doing to ensure that people will understand the importance of adhering to guidelines, regardless of vaccination status, particularly through these winter months? We launched yesterday the next phase of our marketing and communication programme to support compliance with the baseline measures that are still in place, including wearing face coverings to help reduce the harms caused by Covid. I say to everybody that it is really important that we go into the winter that all of us just try to increase our compliance. I understand and all of us slip up from time to time on these things. I understand how tiresome and inconvenient it is, particularly after so long. However, as we go into winter, wearing face coverings and reminding ourselves to do it is really important. I will be doing that, and I would call on everybody to do likewise. The First Minister told Parliament that she would listen to businesses before introducing Covid certification. She did not. Now she is considering extending it. This morning, we learned that one in four Scottish businesses are facing immediate financial peril if Covid restrictions are expanded. That is from a survey conducted by the Scottish Chambers of Commerce. Will the First Minister confirm that, if businesses respond with a resounding no to her creeping plans, as the Scottish Chambers of Commerce already has, calling it a giant step backwards, that she will abandon any extension to the scheme? We do listen to businesses, and we will continue to listen to businesses and important voices, but not the only voice. I also have a duty to listen to those working in the front line of our national health service who are saying, we need to do as much as we can to reduce the risk of Covid transmission. I need to listen to people across the country who want to be able to go back to pubs and restaurants but feel safer as they do so, particularly when we have rising rates of transmission to those who are particularly clinically vulnerable, who also want to feel safe when they are going about their normal life. One of the difficult things, but I accept it as part of the responsibility of taking decisions as opposed to just deciding on a position and sticking to it, is that we have to take account of and listen to a range of views and come to a balanced, sensible and responsible decision. Businesses are an important voice in that, but we have to take account of the wide range of considerations and factors that lead to us taking decisions in what is an inherently difficult and complex set of circumstances. This morning, a concerned constituent, whose daughter has Covid, contacted me about a potential flaw in the Scottish contact and trace system. She received a text saying, you will be sent a link to a digital self-tracing form to list close contacts. After chasing the link, that hadn't appeared. She was then told that she may not receive the link and would be contacted by a contact tracer. That also did not happen. My constituent called Test and Protect, who admitted that there is a problem sending out the text messages with links to the contact tracing forms. First Minister, would you agree that this is a dangerous shambles and must be urgently addressed? No, I don't agree. In fact, I think that that is an insult to all those working so hard in Test and Protect across our country. I am happy to look at the individual case. It certainly sounds there, as if something has happened that shouldn't have happened, and if that is in any way indicative of a more systemic issue, we will take that on board and seek to address that. If the member can send me the details. However, people across Test and Protect are working really hard every single day right now, and the contribution of Test and Protect to helping us to keep Covid at this stage under some control is enormous. Let me just end this answer by placing on record again my grateful appreciation for all that they are doing. That concludes First Minister's statement, Covid-19 update. There will be a brief delay before the next item of business.