One talks a lot about personalized health, but healthcare has always been personal. When a clinician was seeing a patient, he was giving personal treatment. He was using all the information available to make his diagnosis and to adapt the best treatment to that given patient. The difference is that today with the new technologies, we have access to a huge amount, a colossal amount of additional new information that comes on top of what was available before. The trouble is that that wealth of information is no longer interpretable by a single person. We need computation power and bioinformatics can do that. It has been very powerful in helping to understand life sciences. And the same tools can now be applied in the clinics and to provide help to the patient. That's what we refer to as clinical bioinformatics. Clinical bioinformatics is bridging the gap between bioinformatics and the medical realm. And our team within the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics is really very much involved in trying to create a dynamic and a very collaborative framework within Swiss hospitals. And in order to do that, we are working with many Swiss hospitals within working groups to share and most of all define common best practices for bioinformatics analysis in diagnostic. We also have very close collaborations with some hospitals and in particular the University Hospital of Geneva. And with them, we have developed a very specific tool that they use daily in routine for the diagnostic of cancer. And last but not least, we are very much involved in training and in outreach because these new technologies are really about to deeply modify the way we envision health care and we feel that it's of utmost importance that we are all involved.


Hey guys, it's Nate, aka The Foot Accountant. Welcome back to the channel. Team of the Year has caused an absolute madness on FC24. With the Team of the Year attackers and icons in packs, the double SBC player drop that we had yesterday with one Team of the Year icon and a flashback as well as the craziest gameplay glitches I've ever seen yesterday was a wild start to Team of the Year. But what's getting the most exciting is the fact that these Team of the Year attackers look semi-packable and that gives us hope for the rest of Team of the Year. We're going to talk about that because the way their prices are looking on this market and the supply that there is for these icons and attackers, there might be hope for next week as we grind a lot of upgrade packs in this game. So if you're excited for the video and if you're excited for Team of the Year finally being here, drop a thumbs up on the video. And of course, subscribe if you're new. Let's start with yesterday's content and really let's start with the glitches, the gameplay glitches that basically everybody was running into yesterday in squad battles, in foot shams, in rivals, whatever game mode you were playing. There were problems either getting kicked out of the game or seeing some of the wildest player animations I've ever seen happen in Ultimate Team before. If you haven't watched the Nepenthes video of his crazy penalty shootout, make sure you go to his Twitter and check that out.  I've never seen it before. It was wild. It's hilarious what was happening. But EA told us if you're having an issue, turn it off and turn it back on and then tell us when this happens so we can try to fix it. Now, thankfully, a couple hours ago, one of the EA employees tweeted out and said, hey, we think we fixed the issue, some changes were made. And if you're going to get back into the game, make sure you completely shut down the app, close the app and then open it up now. So it should be updated and there shouldn't be any problems. But that was causing people a lot of issues yesterday. I was trying to get into some champs games and right away when you log in, it would just kick you out, right? And then of course, the squad battle glitches, which were even more crazy. So that was one thing that went on yesterday. Now it's the whole gameplay situation. Also, the servers went down yesterday for about 30 minutes after the team of the year dropped at content drop time because there were so many people trying to get on the game. It was absolutely mental. That hasn't happened in a while. But again, team of the year, big day. So that stuff does happen sometimes. At least it wasn't down for super long. Now also really quick, this doesn't have to do with glitches or servers or anything. But EA did post yesterday on Twitter, the full team of the year. You've got ratings, official dynamic images and everything. I guess the leaked ratings that we saw before did not include official dynamic images because that is a different dynamic for Rodri, Jude and Kevin De Bruyne than what we had originally seen before in some of those leak posts. So these are the official dynamics and overall ratings for the team of the year cards. That is on EA's Twitter if you want to take a look at that. Now let's get into the content that actually dropped yesterday inside of the game. We're going to go to Evolutions first because yeah, we had a new Evo. But it's probably one of the least hype parts of the game that was dropped yesterday. The team of the year, Striker Prospect Evolution. This is the Striker Evo that was leaked a couple of days ago that we never got requirements for. Overall, Max 85, Pace Max 89 shooting, dribbling physical requirements as well. And the whole point is you're upgrading a player to be a target for headers, right?  Really, this is an Evo that seems very tailored for a specific group of cards. Like you need to be putting somebody in this Evo that is going to end up being really good at headers, right? Some of the opportunities you have to upgrade cards and some of the options here for players that fit this Evo are not going to be very good at headers. Like Diogo Jota, would you really want to put him into this Evo to get header goals and get power header plus for him? Not necessarily, at least in my opinion. Maybe D'Young, that's a player you want to get in. Maybe Nicholas Jackson, right? Or Garasi. Like some of these players, maybe even Lukaku as well, fit this Evo. But I think a lot of people, as you can tell, the upvote, downvote on footband for these Evo is not that crazy. It's like 17% upvoted. There are some cool cards that you can make from this, but honestly, it's just a really specific card that you're going after. The fact that it's free is nice, so we can't complain too much. And how much work is it? Play four, win two, win three, and then win three. So it's not that many games and you do get a playstop plus at the end, which is cool. It's just different, right? And that is an Evo that we thought we didn't really have leaks for. Besides, we knew a striker Evo was coming. We'll have more Evo opportunities today on this game, but it starts with a bit of an L Evo, I guess, or a mid Evo to begin the team of the year promo. Now, we have a lot more content to get through, so let's keep going through it. Let's go to the objective section where we have a objective, which actually I just remembered. We had this last year as well. We had a 2022 year in review during team of the year. Remember that Doan card and the Emmy Martinez team of the year, honorable mentions. This year, we're starting off with a three-part year in review completionist set, which the first one dropped yesterday with Jacques. We'll look at the card in a second, but then if you're wondering when the next tool will be released, January 26th and January 30th. So we're not going to be able to work on this completionist objective until January 30th. It's going to be a while until we're able to get that done. I would imagine they're dropping two more player cards, just like we had this Jacques yesterday. This is a cool card. I know he's 3-3 and medium-medium, which I don't like, but he's got incisive pass plus, really good play styles, and he got a massive pace upgrade, lever cues and links, 93 passing as well with 99 shot power, 98 short, 96 long pass. That is a really crazy card. 99 aggression, of course, as well. That's a nice objective card at least for, or at the very least for 90 rated fodder. You do have to get a certain number of goals and play a certain number of games to get this. It's not that difficult to do. It does take a little bit of work with some very specific requirements there for how you have to score the goals and such. But that was our objective that was dropped yesterday. It is a nice card if you want to go out and grind that. And yeah, that was decent. Now, SBCs, that's where it's popping off, guys. What we were surprised to see in SBCs yesterday is not one, but two, player SBCs and the exchange SBCs, which we have to talk about. First of all, we've got Bruno Fernandez, right? We always get a flashback. I mentioned that in yesterday's video. Bruno Fernandez is our first flashback SBC that we got. They changed his playstyle plus, which some people are not a huge fan of, but they upgraded his weak foot, gave him a pretty nice pace boost and a pretty nice defensive boost as well. This flashback Bruno is, I don't know if it says in the description here. Yeah, it says his inclusion into 21 team of the year. Now, his dynamic images of him at sporting, like real young Bruno, before he transferred to United. But this is commemorating his team of the year in 2021, which was absolutely phenomenal and a crazy, crazy card. 99 stamina. This looks like a really good box-to-box. He's got great playstyles. Long ball pass, I think I would have rather had incisive pass plus, but long ball pass is still good. Intercept, anticipate, trivella, relentless. Like this is a really, really solid card, guys. And it's not that cheap. It is six squads. It's a little bit higher rated of squads, too. 288s, 287s, and 286s with a couple of in-forms in there as well, or maybe just one in-form requirement. Coming in at 832,000 coins, but since it's Bruno Fernandez with the prem links, and albeit he's going to be good in-game, I think. I mean, I haven't watched any reviews, and this isn't a card that maybe I would do straight away personally for my team, but I think this card, I mean, look at the upvote, downvote, man, and then look at the actual SBC itself on foot bin. It is upvoted very heavily. I went past it. Where's Bruno Fernandez? Bruno Fernandez, upvote, downvote. Is he not in here? Oh, there he is. I went past him twice. 67% upvoted. So people are really excited for this Bruno, and it's one that you'll definitely be able to craft. It won't take that much work while you're opening team of the year upgrade packs, especially in this next week. He will be craftable. But the SBC that was the real surprise was a team of the year icon, George Best, and it was a surprise because, number one, we didn't expect two player SBCs in the same day, and neither did we expect a five-star skill move boost on George Best, and the first card that is available to everybody via SBCs with two playstyle pluses. I think those are the two things that are making this card really get a ton of hype. A high-medium work rate change as well, the skill move, the work rates, all the positions that he can play. Technical plus, there's a lot of praise for this card in game. He only has five playstyles, but two of them are playstyle pluses once again, and people really seem to get really hyped for this George Best card. Obviously a very popular icon. For me, the SBC is at a price that is decent, because if I look at Ribberry and where he's priced on the market, and I think where this George Best would be priced, I don't think that 1.8 mil is that bad. I think it's the surprise of a George Best team of the year icon with a dynamic image with two playstyle pluses and the five-star skills. That is what is making people want to go and do this SBC. I'm sure he's a really insane card, and I might end up even crafting it myself. But this is the SBC combined with Bruno. It's creating a lot of hype for fodder, making some prices move, but it's also creating some prices going down, because people are selling, and there was more content yesterday than we were expecting, especially with SBCs, as a lot of people are doing this card. It's like number one on footbin almost all the time. Well, actually it's not right now, I digress. But this Best card, actually the SBC was a lot cheaper when the lightning rounds were going on. He was as cheap as 1.6 mil. He's making fodder go up, himself, and there's a couple other reasons too, which we'll talk about that. But that is a really good SBC, and once again, craftable during the team of the year Upgrade Packs period. It's out for 60 days, right? I think 60 days it's out for, so you've got a long time to get that done. So two massive player SBCs yesterday that people are very, very excited for, and then of course a bunch of Upgrade Packs as well. We have an 83 times 10. We have an 84 plus times five, and then we have an 81 double. The player pick came back for the team of the weeks, and we also have an 85 plus player pick, which you can only do once a day. I was a little bit disappointed in that. I was hoping for like two or three times a day, but it's only one time a day. But the 83 10 and the 84 five are three times a day, and that is going to be consistent demand for the low tier of fodder, which isn't up at all, but it is in demand. And also there's inform requirements in that 83 10, and actually maybe in the 84 times five as well. Yeah, there's an inform requirement there too. So informs are in demand, but they're not really up that much. They were up at 31,000 coins before content, and they've actually dropped back down a little bit since then. Let's get a live look in on informs. We'll talk about fodder a little bit more of course, because I think there are some opportunities with it. Informs were 26k earlier. Looks like they are still around 25 to 26,000 coins at the moment. And again, the team of the week player pick is cheaper than 26k, because 82s and 83s are so cheap. The team of the player pick is 19,000 coins. So I would do that if you need to get some informs for SBCs in this game. Let's talk about the other SBCs that were a crazy surprise. The exchange SBCs. Like this is crazy. And guys, there's actual value here. I want to talk you guys through this because what this is is kind of what the reason they dropped these packs for and these SBCs for in my opinion is two things. The first one is these are good for when you have a duplicate, right? Let's say you get a duplicate 85 to 89 rated, you can then put it into this SBC. And if your club is running out of players, it's almost like an automatic club restock, especially if you get a high rated 89 overall, you get a 51 players pack, which includes 14 rares. You could pack a team of the year onto that.  But some people might be like, Nate, I need 89 ratings for SBCs. Well, it's just another option that you have. But also what this is nice for is like, I put an 85 rated into my club because I had some of that and I had an 85, but I didn't have like an 82 or an 83. And I packed an 83 out of the seven players pack that you get from this. These are really, really intriguing, really intriguing. Sometimes you just need to get rid of a duplicate card, especially when you don't have any quick sell recoveries left, which is a lot of the crafting might run you out of quick sell recoveries during team of the year. So these are nice for that. And really are they good values? The question, should you be doing these? It feels weird to put an 89 rated card in, but when you get 51 players back, it makes you think, guys, we've done a little bit of calculating with this. The pack value that you get back from this pack right here, you're getting about 41, 42,000 coins worth of the non-rare golds and the rare golds back from this pack. What are 89 rated right now in this market? 35K. I know you're spending 35,000 coins to buy one of those to put it into this pack here, but it's kind of a decision you're going to have to make through trying it out and what your club needs. But I think some people, and that's part of the reason why fodder has bounced back up in price so well as it has. I think people are starting to buy those fodder cards to put them into these packs because you get so many players back. Now I have not done one of them yet. I'd be very interested to try them. They're out for the entirety of team of the year. That is going to be very helpful for crafting later on down the line. And yeah, it seems crazy to put an 89 or an 88 rated player into this. But like guys, I think there's actually some reason to do so. So we're going to have to test those out and see how it works. But like look at fodder guys. Like it was very low during the lightning rounds and now it's starting to come back up. I think it's a combination of the two player SBCs that we have that are insane and also people opening packs, right? Tons of supply we're going to talk about all the way down to 16K for 88s. And now they're back to the same price and even higher than what they were before content yesterday. People have started opening packs. They have coins and they're going and doing the icon of species, the player SBCs, but they're also doing these exchange SBCs too. So it's a really interesting scenario with these. And I'm down to try them out. The 89 overall one seems crazy. But then again, you're giving up a high rated fodder card that could go into a player SBC. So it's just something different that we're going to have to try out because that's something that we did not expect to see. Now let's talk about packs a little bit. Let's talk about supply since we're kind of on the topic. They're running the crazy lightning rounds. They're running the crazy packs. There are lightning rounds that are out at almost all times of the day. Right now we've got an 81 times 100 and tradable, a super 86 plus pack. But the pack yesterday that really supplied the cards a lot early on was a, I think it was like a times, I don't know how many players ran it, but it was a times something attackers pack. And there was all attackers with a 400K pack. It was tradable. That's kind of like, remember how the 84 times 10 supplied stuff really crazy the last couple of weeks, which they still might drop in 84 times 10. But it was that pack yesterday that I think it was times 15 or maybe it was times 50 attackers pack. It was crazy how many attackers were in that pack. It supplied that part of the market and especially the team of the years really, really well. They also dropped the 700K pack yesterday, which if you look at the pack gods in here, and guys, this is the real hype for team of the year. Yeah, the content's good, but with the team of the year cards, their prices and look at these numbers. We have six team of the year cards and packs, just the attackers. And the 700K pack gives you a 4.7% chance of packing them. I know it's a crazy pack, but there's only six cards and packs. Add the other 18 when you think about the men's and women's 12th vote whenever that is out. We'll have a total of 24 team of the year cards and packs. What is that percent going to be then from a 700K pack? Is it going to be like 15% that's going to be crazy. The odds of packing a team of the year look way better. And guys, it seems like they might actually be packable this year, right? And I'm not just going off of the numbers in the store, because those can be misleading. But what I'm also going off of is the amount of supply on the market. I'm seeing for not only some of the actual team of the year cards, but for the icons as well. Guys, these cards yesterday, there were 26 or 27 pages of team of the year Sam Kerr on the market in the first hour yesterday after these cards were dropped. And yes, there are some of these that are cheaper than others, right? Sophia Smith and Sam Kerr are the cheapest two team of the year cards. And they look cracked when Sophia Smith went on to the market and I saw her max price was, oh, that's another card right there, 1.43. When I saw her max price was 2.9 mil. I was surprised. I knew right then that these cards were going to end up being a little bit cheaper and they have maintained that. Now, of course, you got a really expensive team of the years, right? These are the two cheap ones, right? You got Hanson who's six mil. You've got Messi who's eight. Holland is four and five mil now. And then Mbappe's 15. So yes, these cards are expensive. There is no doubt about that. But the fact that the women's cards and some of the icons, you've got Zola, 600K, Javi, 700K. He was under 600K before. These cards have really rebounded. Riberty was 2.5. Check was 360Ks. Now up 100,000 coins, right? We've had big rises since that crazy supply early on. But that just tells me that these cards are actually packable. And that's the real reason to be excited going forward during a team of the year. Because last year, we talked about it for so long how the pack weight just was terrible on all of these cards and it did not make us want to open packs for a team of the year. And it made a team of the year really a drag, right? We had good SBCs and we had good content and we were excited for that. But it was like we're opening packs and there was like no point to opening those packs because it just seemed like it was so hard to pack team of the years. And based off of also how many team of the years I'm seeing popping up on my ex Twitter timeline, guys, it really makes me excited for doing upgrade packs the next two weeks in this game. Even just open a couple packs here or there, like it feels like there's actual potential to pack one of these, albeit it's going to be hard. But if you try, if you've got a lot of packs saved, I would get excited because this looks way better than last year based off of the supply on the market. Now, of course, these cards are pretty cheap. I think that is due to the supply. But I also just think that maybe the women's team of the year cards are going to end up being a little bit more packable. I mean, look at Sam Kerr and look at Sophia Smith, 1.4 mil for a first day team of the year card, especially with these stats. I know everybody looks at the 80 composure on Sophia Smith and says, oh my goodness, Nate, this card is terrible. Compare this card to Golden Boppe and tell me that it's terrible. This is going to be one of the better attackers in the game and it's only 1.4 mil. This could be a card that ends up rising up a lot in the next couple of days. Or of course, with the supply being different this year, it could drop down a little bit too. I don't even know where these cards are going to go, man. They're going to be all over the place. Of course, these attackers are only in packs for the next two days. Well, less than two days now. They're only in packs for two days total. So they could rise up a little bit before they all come into packs next Thursday. But be careful with these cards today. They will fluctuate, but a lot of people want to try them. And there is so much hype for all the team of the year cards. We saw their prices move a ton yesterday. People were buying them, selling them, and wanting to go and try them out in the game. And maybe with the gameplay fixed today, they could even go up a little bit because I do believe that we saw the most amount of supply as we looked at that fodder graph on Pop and her graph went down a bunch of content. That's how these cards graphs look as well. They were low about an hour to two hours after the content drop and then really went up in price as they started to get rare and as people started to go buy them. So just crazy, right? And then the cards themselves, W stat boost. Like, look at Javi for 700,000 coins. This looks like a card that is actually worth 700K as well. From his base icon, you get not only one, but two playstyle pluses, technical long ball pass, 97 passing plus five, six, and seven in all the different stat categories on his card. They did a great job of upgrading these. This Zola makes me not want to do the icon EVO for Zola anymore because that card looks irrelevant compared to this 91 with dead ball and finesse, 600K for him. The Vieira boost is insane. The check boost, I will say this. Some people are asking why is there no playstyle plus on the goalkeeper upgrade here. I think it actually has been confirmed and even said by EA somewhere, I missed it, but a couple people are talking about this, that goalkeepers will not receive any playstyle pluses through the entire year, except for in like pro clubs or something. So in ultimate team at least, I don't think we can expect that like I was starting to and we talked about earlier, but that's not the case. Other icon goalkeepers are down bad. Like if you take a look at Schmeichel, I think, not Dudek. Van Der Sar. Yes, Van Der Sar is who I'm thinking of. And the other icon goalkeeper that's a thunderstruck is Casius. He is down a lot because of this check dropping on the game yesterday. People love icon goalies. And I think check has the headwear in game. So that's pretty sick. So I like the cards. I think the team of your icons are great. And again, I'm excited for the pack weight, but not to belabor the point there. Let's talk about the market because since content was so good with the SBCs and since the cards were like actually kind of affordable, like when you have two team of the years on the market that are less than 2 million coins, that makes a lot of people able to afford them. And then when you throw in four icons that are less than 3 million coins, especially with Zola and Javi being as cheap as they were, the market yesterday didn't just immediately fly with the coin injection because there was so much good content. There was actually some panic selling. You know, card prices that were really high heading into the content drop yesterday on Friday actually took a little bit of a drop, but a lot of them are starting to rebound now. It was kind of just like the shock of content created a market that was very uncertain. And now you have prices that are starting to go up. Some are still low, like it's Tevez and this Wesley Snyder is still 1.1 mil, I believe. Yeah, 1.12. That's still really low for him, but I've gotten some really good sales. I didn't buy any team of the year cards yesterday. I was all in on out-of-pack specials, this Ribri. Guys, like I made over 200,000 coins on company and this Palo Futre alone yesterday. And we've made really good coins probably upwards of like 400,000 coins. Like this Ribri was a 60K flip. This Vialli was another, I think, 30,000, 20,000 coins. This Sun, I bought for 305. Still have a couple other ones. I bought this for 505. So we've had some really good flips and I still have some other cards, like a 91 Sala that I bought for 411 just a bit ago. Like that's a really, really low price for him. I'm really looking at the rest of the market right now and saying, okay, content's probably gonna slow down a little bit now. Especially after yesterday's madness. We're gonna get content today, but I think it slowed down a little bit and that's gonna create opportunity. Wait, this Sala just sold for 485 and I bought one for 411. We're balling, right? I think there's opportunity for some of these cards that have come down. Like this Hansen was 1 million coins and now she's back under 900K, but her team of the year cards, 7,000. This is a card that is still almost guaranteed to go up. If you wanna buy it for your team, I still think there's great opportunity here to buy these cards. And even for a short-term flip, the market is very healthy with a lot more coins on it. That's the one thing to keep in mind going forward is that there's a lot of coins in this market and people are buying cards. Stick to the out-of-packs, stick to the rare, and if you bought a card for your team on Tuesday or Wednesday or Thursday even, you probably still paid for most cards in this market a lower price than what they are now. I'm looking through a lot of these cards that are panic sold per se and they didn't even go down lower than what they were earlier in the week. Like, look at Kaka, he's 950K. Look at this one that I was looking at from Thursday even. He was 837,000 coins. So the market's a mixed bag, but it is starting to go up a lot as you're seeing cards get rare and people have coins and that is a good thing. Now we talked about fodder at length already, but I do wanna look at fodder just one more time and talk about it again because with all of the demand that is out there and yeah, you're gonna have more lightning rounds today, I think fodder is probably gonna rise up a little bit in the morning and then maybe drop after content. It might be, remember this happens a couple times a year where we have a lot of lightning rounds but a lot of demand at the same time. If you start to see fodder fluctuations, like fodder has come back up from where it was yesterday, right? Like 86s are 7.5K and yesterday after content they were all the way down at 6,700 coins. If we get all those same lightning rounds again today on Saturday, which we probably will or at least some release of a lot of lightning rounds maybe not the exact same ones, if fodder drops down to where it was or even close to where it was, like if 88s go back to like 17K and you can get them on bid even for 17K and they're like at 19K, get on bids today with supply because these cards are gonna keep fluctuating with all the demand that is out there. It might be one of those promos where you can buy fodder every day like an hour or two after content and then sell it the next day right before content or in the middle of the day and make yourself one, two, three thousand coins a card maybe even more than that on the higher tier. Goodness, 90 rated cards were 48,000 coins yesterday and now they're 55, 56K. These cards are in packs. Look at this man, 48K zoom all the way up to 55. The fodder is in very high demand and there's a lot of coins and that's another testament to it. So if you're gonna be trading actively on this market out of packed special cards maybe you'll be careful with center mids. Some center mids haven't rebounded as well especially if we do get more flashback SBCs in that position which we still have leaks for we'll talk about that in a second but I think the market's very healthy and it's gonna continue to slowly rise and of course links to popular players the more rare cards will continue to rise up more in the next couple of days. Let's talk about today before we start blabbering too much on this video. We have a couple of flashback SBCs we have a new one that we didn't talk about in yesterday's video Alfonso Davies. So we have a defender flashback now we have a striker Alex Morgan who we didn't get yesterday although it would make sense with attackers right. We've got a Conte still and now we have an Alfonso Davies. Guys again these SBCs probably are not going to be released the next four days or the next three days that we have left right. These are going to be spread out during team of the year but usually on Saturdays of a promo it is an SBC type of day. I don't know if we're going to get a Davies. I don't know if we're going to get Conte or Alex Morgan today or Sawa right. So we have multiple player SBCs that are leaked right now. We could get something completely different. We might not get a player SBC at all. I'm not entirely sure. But last year on Saturday was our team of the year icon SBC for Hugo Sanchez but we already have George Best. So that's obviously not what's going to be happening today. I'm really curious to find out what happens. It might be a day where they try to chill out on the SBC content for a day maybe and instead go in for the Evo content. We still have those two center defensive mid and center mid evils that are leaked. And one great thing you could do on the market right now is potentially look through some of those gold cards that were up and inflated in price earlier in the week for evolutions like Shloop right. Remember on was it Wednesday or Thursday when this was leaked. Shloop on Thursday was 2,000 coins. Even yesterday he was inflated above 1,000 coins heading into Conte and now he's 950. You can probably get him on bid for cheap right. Because he was a card that was really inflated for the upcoming evolutions that were leaked. Where is Bell Guard Day? Because he's another one. Yes Bell Guard Day on the market. That's the one that's extinct. This one's on the market right here. He went crazy on Thursday right for these leaked evils. He was up at like three to four thousand coins. Yesterday he was also about two and a half K right before Conte 1.7. And he's dropped off since then down to like 900. Maybe you try to pick up a couple of those on bid. Again be careful. You don't want to trade with those too crazily because there are bands that get handed out if those cards go to max price. But I do believe we'll get one of the two evils today. And again just to show you those again. Those are the team of the year Visionary Evo which is a center defensive mid Evo. And then also the team of the year Unsung Hero which are both paid evolutions which means they're a little bit better. Those big upgrades there you can see. Those are some pretty solid upgrades. But I think it might be a little bit of a better Evo Day today on Saturday in this game. And then maybe another upgrade pack SPC. I know it seems crazy because we have so many. But I wouldn't be surprised if there was another upgrade pack SPC as well that was released of some sorts. I know we have the hero pick that is out. Guys they could even drop an icon pack today. So watch the leaks. There might be stuff happening before content. The daily bronze and silver are going away as well. It's something to keep in mind because those are very very handy on this game as well. And for the market today team of the years if you're wanting to try one of them out I would probably wait to buy until we get closer to content. I know that we were just looking at Sophia Smith and Sam Kerr and they both look a lot rarer right now in the market than they did before. I think Sophia Smith has the most hype out of these two players. The most affordable team of the years for sure. But Sam Kerr has got a lot of hype as well. If Sophia Smith is ending up around 1.4 mil. 1.4 I'd have to get a snipe for me to want to buy this card to try to sell it into tomorrow. There's so much hype for this item. It's crazy guys. But again the supply is also a lot different from what we've seen in years past. So it'll be interesting to follow these cards over the next couple days and we will follow them very closely on this game with the daily videos and everything else going on. I opened a couple of packs yesterday just to quickly update. I packed Neymar out of my attacker packs no team of the years yet for me. We're going to get a team of the year counted sorted here pretty soon. My midfielder packs are ready for tomorrow and Sunday. We'll open those and see if we get lucky. And then the rest of this stuff guys are just packs that we will be waiting on until we get the full team in packs next Thursday and then more cards in packs next Friday. Also something to note the icons are in packs for three more days. So they will be in packs until what's the math there. Four days in total. They will be in packs until Tuesday. So kind of like the same schedule. I think that's right. The same schedule as the versus promo that was a couple of weeks ago. So these cards will be in packs and then they'll go out of packs. Then they might return at the very end. We'll see how EA do it with these team of the year icons. But that's enough yapping from me. Hopefully you guys got lucky with the packs yesterday. If you packed a team of the year tweet me please man. My ex my Twitter is down below in the description. I want to see those. I've been tweeted so many times already today. It's crazy. Just again another testament to the legit. The packs seem to be giving out somewhat better weight of team of the years this year in this game. And I'm excited to rip player picks and grind the menus the next couple of weeks. So if you're excited as well drop a thumbs up. Comment below if you have any questions.  See you guys in video tomorrow. It's been Nathan for the count and catch you guys there. Peace out.


You know, Derek James, his coach, a lot of people are saying, you know, he was saying that he had to fly out to London the next day. A lot of people are saying that he, you know, he spread itself too thin, you know, now that this loss has happened. You know, how did that, Nacey? Yeah, yeah, for sure. Yeah. He got too many other things that he focused in on outside of Earl Spence, Junior. What do you say to that? I mean, do you feel the same way or do you feel like his total focus is as it's always been? I don't have a, I don't have a comment about that. No comment. Don't boss talk one-on-one. One-on-one. One-on-one. Here we go.  I mean, I don't know why people think me and Earl got something. Straight up. Nothing has happened. I'm tired of people acting like something happened between me and his brother. You know, it ain't nothing, we ain't had no issues whatsoever, and I get it. But no excuses, no reasoning, just I'm not working with you no more, basically. And now you stand on the outside looking in, you guys be around each other. You don't ever have, you never asked him? I've never asked him. You know, of course it'd be in my mind, like I would be lying if, if I, if I'm not being real, if I don't wonder why, I've always wondered why, because I feel like, you know, we, we, we had like, I was, I feel like I was sugar, I was a sugar to the Kool-Aid, you know what I'm saying? But outside of that, then we had a personal relationship, so, you know. Was it his, the total decision or is it, like, the organization? I have. I have. You know what I mean? I have. It might not just be his decision. Listen, people been asking me this for years, and I always say, y'all got to go talk to EJ. I got to talk to Earl. I'm not the one, because if he want me to train him, you know what I'm going to do. I'm pulling up. The point is that I fight this huge, and I fight that was going to be this, you know. Career defining. Right. Mm-hmm. That you have shown so much success with him over all of the different, um. People you've dealt with. Right. Facts. Like, why wouldn't he pull for you more than anybody else? That's the part that is baffling to me. Listen, I don't, listen, to this day, I'm trying to tell you, I have no idea. What you done, what you done wrong? You don't know what you done wrong. Well, I didn't do nothing wrong. How you done wrong? How you done wrong? How you going to do something? Earl ain't did nothing. You done something wrong. Listen, how you going to do something wrong when y'all undefeated together? Good work. Three, four. Outside. Right. Y'all never lost together. The world sees how strong and how powerful he was when me and him worked together. One, two, five. Up top. Up top. Up top. Up top. Make it make sense. You and him undefeated together. You've never, he's never lost a fight, of course, dealing with you. Go look at the face. Damn. I'm upset, you know, because I would love to see your conditioning and him in the ring with Bud Kraw. And then you got to think about it. Like I said, bro, when all the fights that I tried him, we didn't use weights, you know what I mean? And I, I never had a hundred percent of control of what we done while we were training. So I was handicapped while I was training him. And we still got those results. No try, I don't believe another training in this world could have certain exercises that you're allowed to do and can't do. And you're still going to get those results training somebody. Wow.  And maybe not on your part, but the team, somebody said you know what I mean? I want to ask you more questions, but I got to get back in here and ask a question. You don't wait. Listen, I'm going to tell you something. Anybody that, anybody that know, listen, anybody that know Traylon Curry, they'll tell you, I'm a real, I'm silent, man. I'm from the street. I'm not from no fitness. And where I come from, anybody put my name on it. They go take it now. He a honey. He's silent. So you know already it wasn't that you were straight up and down on your side. Listen, man, listen, listen, Earl, Earl, Earl. No. Anytime he needed me, I pull up. And he needs you now. You put it up. Yeah. Of course I'm pulling up. It's not even a question. We don't went out hunting together. Come on, man. I'm a soldier, bro. No. A real talk. One, two, five. Watch out. Watch out. All right. And I get it, man. But you know, Derek James, his coach, a lot of people are saying, you know, he was saying that he had to fly after London the next day. A lot of people saying that he, you know, he, he, he spread itself too thin, you know, now that this process happened, you know, how the naysayers. Yeah, yeah, for sure. He got too many other things that he focusing on outside of Earl Spence, uh, junior. What do you say to that? I mean, do you feel the same way? Or do you feel like his total focus is as it's always been? I don't have a, I don't have a comment about that. No comment. I can, people, y'all, he won't, he won't, you know, I love this part. No comment. No comment. Oh, man.  Have there been other people who reached out to you to train them? Oh yeah, for sure. But, oh yeah, yeah, for sure.  No, I'm talking to that level. No, no, no, no, no. Well, no, no, no, not on Earl level. No, no, no. Is it something that you wouldn't take because of the relationship with you and Earl that you wouldn't even take it? For sure. You see what I'm saying? Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, it's certain people I won't train because of Earl for sure.  I mean, again, another day, it's just certain people I wouldn't deal with. You wouldn't do it. Because I'm a lawyer to a fault. No, and I agree with that. I'm built like that. I agree with that so much. You know what I'm saying?  I enjoy it, man.  Big extra plug comes out. The music is off just a little bit as I keep saying. To me, Earl didn't look the way he normally looked for me. Yeah. When I hear the song, lose yourself with Eminem and I look over there at Bud Crawford.  Yeah, he did.  And before he got in that ring, he prayed. I said and watched this man pray, take his time and pray. I said, listen, bro, I'm going to be honest with you. You watched this fight. I said, I see him when I seen Bud say Jesus Christ openly, bro, I'm going to keep it a hundred. I had a new respect for him. You see what I'm saying? Because I'm believing Jesus Christ hands down. You see what I'm saying?  I was like, I respect that. We know people ain't going to do that, man. I respect that. Now I'm keeping it a hundred. I respect that for sure. But I believe that everything happens for a reason and that's the same thing I said in my last interview. You know, yes, everybody's upset of him having a loss and what he has to go through. But we all have to go through things so we can get better. Yeah, for sure. So we can be who God intended us to be. You understand what I mean? I totally agree. Do you have a game plan? If Earl Spence was to call you, Earl Spence Jr. called you right now and say, we got to go to work. I got to be ready by December. Could you put a game plan together to make him the most ready to go fighter that you ever seen within the, within under six months or five month period. You see what I'm saying? You're going to disrespect me like that? I'm just asking you, man. The people are going to know. We didn't even come out of your mouth. Listen, men lie, women lie. Numbers don't. Numbers don't lie. Of course I can get them in. Listen, that's what I do.


Always going to be that trust and faith required to just, okay, I will step back and lead the way. I will keep moving towards this, even though the ego is screaming, something's gone terribly wrong, and you're going to be sorry, forever having taken the first steps on this path, and like the Matrix, why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?  And indeed, there will seem to come a point where you will come to the threshold of the disappearance of the universe. But that threshold comes with much, much, much being done through, much mind training, much devotion, you know, to put it, forever when I say much devotion, the hummingbird stops, right in front. Like, good point. Like, emphasis on much devotion, yeah, that that hummingbird stopped right there to just give us an exclamation point for that one. But that's, that's to try to give you a context of this whole spectrum so that you shouldn't be so frightened when you move along into this. The fear will come up, but that's when you need the faith and trust to keep moving, to keep opening, to keep letting go, and realize that that faith is your security, that trust is your safety. And it's in the Holy Spirit. It's not based in trust in something of the world. You're not being asked to trust the flesh. You're not being asked to trust your past learning. You're not being asked to trust the images. You're being asked to trust the Holy Spirit and trust the one who is the bridge back to eternity, the one who will give you whatever you seem to need in this journey and will renew it for as long as you have need of it. Whatever you seem to need, it will be given you and it will be renewed as long as you have need of it.


Hello there, this is a presentation which is going to outline some of the support that care leavers and care experienced students are able to receive while studying at the University of Greenwich. The University of Greenwich recognises the unique challenges faced by children in care, care leavers and care experienced students as they enter higher education and we are committed to help students achieve their potential. The support we offer has been put in place to help you to have a smooth transition into university and to provide you with opportunities to successfully gain your qualification and progress into a fulfilling career. Our designated members of staff are here to help you with your transition into higher education and can advocate for you and signpost and refer you to the University's support services throughout your studies. We take confidentiality extremely seriously and will not share that you are a care experienced student to anyone including tutors, other students or members of staff without your express permission. So what support is available? Accommodation The University of Greenwich offer all care leavers students accommodation in their halls of residence throughout the year including the summer for the duration of your studies. So please make sure you let the accommodation office know if this is something that you think you might require as due to events and redecorating that take place during the summer we will sometimes have to ask you to move to another flat. Local authorities have a responsibility to relevant care leavers to help with accommodation out of turn time. This might mean that they help to fund summer accommodation in University halls or rent if you're living independently during this period but you will need to speak to your personal advisor or leaving care team to find out what your local authority offer to you as this differs slightly across the country. Finance The amount of student support you will receive to enable you to fund your studies will depend on several factors including where you study and your personal circumstances. You should make your application online to Student Finance England as soon as you know that you intend to enter higher education. As a care leaver you will be required to provide a letter from your local authority to confirm your care leaver status in order to qualify for the maximum maintenance loan. A local authority higher education bursary of £2,000 will be paid to all relevant care leavers entering higher education up to the age of 25. You should speak to your local authority to determine how you will receive your bursary as it can be paid in a lump sum or instalments. Local authorities also have a responsibility to help care leavers with other costs relating to entering higher education and you should discuss what level of support will be provided to you with your personal advisor or leaving care team. The Care Leaver Bursary provides young care leavers with a bursary of £1,500 a year for up to three or four years depending on the length of your course, plus £200 towards the cost of graduation. The bursary is not means tested but you must be in receipt of full student support and meet the eligibility criteria. The Greenwich Bursary is worth £700 for new undergraduate students with a low household income and is paid into instalments. The bursary is assessed and awarded automatically by the student fees and funding team and paid onto an aspire card which can be spent on textbooks, stationery and other learning resources and also on student union, clubs, societies and gym memberships. There are many other university funds and scholarships so do check out the fees and funding web pages to see if you are eligible to apply. Whilst you are studying at the University of Greenwich you can also gain money advice and support throughout your studies through our student fees and funding advice service who can offer financial support, advice and guidance to all students. Lastly, don't forget to search the web and check out external organisations and charities that support care leavers and care experienced students as some of them are able to offer small grants to assist you whilst you are studying. Greenwich Friends Transition Support One of the main areas we support is your transition into university through our Greenwich Friends Peer Mentoring Scheme. Some of our lovely second and third year student ambassadors choose to undergo further training as they want to be able to support new students as you make one of the biggest changes in your life and start university. Greenwich Friends are here to provide you with a friendly contact to welcome you and help you as you navigate your way around campus and the university systems and processes of registration, accessing your class timetables and submitting coursework. They can provide you with confidential one-to-one support and guidance to make your transition into university a positive experience and can offer a range of support and advice from, that room is on the floor, the third floor, to yes, bring a pillow by phone, text, email and in person. We also have student ambassador Greenwich Friends available on campus on moving in day in September so that you can have someone on hand who can answer questions and help you to move into halls. They can also just be a welcoming, friendly face to be able to have a cup of tea with on this important day. We'd really encourage you to take up this offer Greenwich Friends mentor as it can make such a difference to your start at university and help you to overcome any anxieties you may have quickly so that you can concentrate on settling in and making the most of your time at university. Academic support. Your first point of contact for academic support will be your personal tutor but our library services can also offer support throughout your studies. Academic skills and study skills workshops can help you with learning how to reference and write in an academic style. This is a free service that also provides individual advice so please do make use of them throughout your studies to help you with your essays and dissertations. We also have a separate math center which can provide help throughout the year. Student well-being. There are student well-being teams located on each campus who can provide advice and support around maintaining your health and well-being during your time at university. They can be accessed online and through one-to-one appointments. In addition to our mental health advisors and counselors you can also gain free online support with Big White Mall, an online mental health community which is available 24 hours a day. A student well-being team also includes members of staff who can support students with a disability or dyslexia. They can help with claiming disabled students allowance and provide ongoing support and extra help with your studies including setting up any special exam requirements. In addition to our disability and dyslexia team we also provide an initiative called Start which supports prospective and current students who have a disability long-term health condition, specific learning difficulty and or mental health condition. Start is run by Melanie Thorley and Start ambassadors who are student ambassadors with their own disability or diversity. They can provide balanced first-hand experiences of the achievements and challenges of university life. You do not need a diagnosis to join Start. Employability and career service. The university's employability and career service can help you to perfect your CV and job seeking skills throughout your time at university and as you graduate. They also operate a job shop and student ambassador scheme where if you are successful in your application to be a student ambassador you can again work at the university helping to support different departments in their work. An example of this would be working on open days to help students around the campuses or going into schools or assisting with webinars. Recruitment for student ambassadors normally takes place in September and October so do keep a lookout on your student portal as soon as you become a registered student. Student union. The student union at the University of Greenwich run events and activities throughout the year both on campus and online to help welcome you to the university and make new friends. They also support many societies which can help you in your studies and provide opportunities to help you achieve your career ambitions. In addition the student union advice team can provide support for both academic and non-academic issues including welfare, finance and housing. The team is independent from the university meaning they can give you an impartial view and support you with any challenges you face. Lastly don't forget to get your totem national union of students card which can provide you with discounts in hundreds of shops. Questions. Well you may still be left with some questions as they relate to you and your individual circumstances. Every student is different and every student situation is different so please don't hesitate to get in touch with us and we'll do our best to help you. You can contact either Will Calver, the designated member of staff or Chris Coulson, the Careleaver coordinator at Careleavers at Greenwich.ac.uk. Please do also look at our support booklet on our webpage particularly for more information about the pre-entry support we can offer. We look forward to hearing from you and hopefully to meeting you in the future.


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overload here We're gonna be talking about scream seven in this video here again today We're gonna be talking about Neff Campbell who has allegedly commented on Melissa Barreira's firing from the project and once again if she'd be back for scream seven or not now This was from a comment left on Beyond the mask channel which I'll leave a link to that video so you guys can read the comment in the description These are very brief comments But in the past she stated that she'd be down if they paid her correctly and if they respected her of course Then at another point prior she said she can't talk about it likely due to the strike But she was also saying she couldn't talk about it before the strikes as well So I don't know why she was doing that there Then more recently Sena stealth who has been right about projects like freaky Friday to Crystal Lake and the Halloween series Twinty that they had it on good authority that producers were still trying to play hardball with Neff as recently as right after the Strikes ended big screen leaks says there have been no negotiations Melissa Barreira actually was fired a month ago before the reports According to major outlets So the franchise is seemingly just in shambles from the outside looking in however as I stated allegedly Neff made brief remarks about Melissa Barreira's firing. Let me read this comment here again from beyond the mask channel I'll leave a link to the video in the description for you guys to read this comment And then I'll share my thoughts on it after I get done reading it. So according to David Walker They go on to say today. I finally met the scream gang at Steel City con All of you that said it was the best experience of your lives were being a hundred percent truthful Matthew Lillard is the coolest person on this earth. He is such a larger-than-life guy in the flesh I also met Dermot Moroni to he signed my scream six still case box I met Neff Campbell and she is so sweet and humble I mentioned Melissa Barreira being dropped from screen seven and she said it was unfortunate But she had heard about it. I was cheeky and after asked if she was going to be back for scream seven She said who knows at this point Then they go on to say in the comments to this they said yeah, she didn't really focus on it She just said she said that she had heard about it and that it was unfortunate. She was sympathetic though now Here's the thing. So unfortunate is a reasonable PR like response. Wouldn't you agree? She again also said who knows at this point when asked about returning to seven But was sympathetic about Melissa's situation Obviously a lot of folks would love for Neff to just say oh screw spyglass and I'm not returning to scream seven So if these alleged comments are true, I can see some people getting up in arms getting their pitchforks Stopping their feet until their heels are bleeding, you know, the whole nine yards Then there are others who understand that she is her own person with her own life and finances to consider That we may know nothing about and we quite literally do not care because that is her life We don't care if she signs on to return for seven then so be it It's not a decision anyone but Neff has to live with so I'm not going to lose sleep over it I would implore a lot of you to not lose sleep over it either There are ways to stand in solidarity with your peers and those you've worked with on film with if Neff's form of Solidarity is texting Melissa showing support in private and Melissa's responding approving of all This saying she doesn't hold anything against you or anyone else who still does the movie then that's enough Melissa Borrell does not seem like a very unreasonable person. I'm gonna read read dress it later on Not everything has to be this public display of hey look how more morally righteous I am it just does not have to be that of course Neff has heard about it And there's a chance she has chatted with Melissa Melissa could simply just hope that her co-stars respect and applaud her for standing firm on what she believes in and not try to Participate in the censorship of her freedom of speech the way spyglass has now done and that's how I see it If you're here in this country, you need to be able to just speak freely about topics like what she's addressing She did she did nothing wrong with what she was doing in terms of expressing her first amendment Right what spyglass did in my opinion, that's wrong because they were the ones that started acting childish They were the ones that started Firing her getting her out the door and used it as an excuse to get her out the door in what I've been seen from the report Since she was allegedly fired Reportedly fired. I should say a month prior to when we first started hearing about it So because Melissa wasn't the one who was getting pissy about all this That was spyglass she doesn't seem like she wants all of The people who were previously involved to just say hey, you know what fuck that movie stand stand up for me by saying fuck that movie She doesn't seem like she wants that Considering if you look back at everything she was about to work with them She was about to put morals aside and work with spyglass who were the ones who chose to fire her Granted that doesn't mean she knew what side of the spectrum spyglass fell on I don't want to give give them too much credit It's just a lot to consider when you talk down on talent who are going to likely choose to do scream 7 and say oh well They aren't supporting Melissa Barrera But we don't know where that threshold of support even ends for her as her own person Melissa doesn't seem like an unreasonable individual and I will 100% believe she isn't stressing scream 7 isn't sitting around Hoping people don't sign on she knows how this industry is but she still shouldn't have been fired over this because it's absolutely ridiculous Anyway, Nev's brief comments about the situation being unfortunate is just never being professional as always the remark about who knows at this point for her return Lines up with the fact that they're in a creative overhaul and they haven't made an offer to her yet I will say this though. It's just a rumor But two times now I have heard someone at spyglass Allegedly doesn't like Nev Campbell. This has been told to me from two different people who have been right about some stuff They shared with me in the past. You don't have to like someone though to do business with them In fact, I'd argue that when doing business you should never go into it Worrying about who the hell is liking you but who is treating you right and who is treating you wrong You can dislike a lot of people but still have enough sense to understand that your dislike of a person is not grounds to Mistreat them. Now if you don't agree there, I don't know what to tell you So her saying who knows for now to me I mean, she's not ruling it out until and offers made or she just doesn't want to discuss it any further and gave a Simplistic reply because I know a lot of people would have loved for these alleged comments to have been Her saying hey, you know what? I'm not returning because I don't like how they treated Melissa Barrera But that's not that's not necessarily how this is going to work That's the view you would have in terms of what you want But that's not obviously you would have to be aware that that's not how it's gonna That's not how this cookie is gonna crumble There are people who are going to jump on the opportunity to make money They have to sustain a livelihood in some capacity They are going to do business with people who maybe they don't morally agree with Nines as out of ten on very serious topics. That's going to happen. It's not going to stop It's going to keep occurring Through and through because that's the society that has existed for so long It's not going to just stop right now people are going to sign on to do scream 7 and if one of them happens to be Neve Campbell Then so be it let me know what you guys think about this down in the comment section below if you haven't already course Make sure you subscribe turn on post notification numbers video in the description. I have links on social media accounts I am on Facebook Twitter and Instagram you can message me there, of course Let me know is any movies news or reviews you like me to cover in the future and with all that in mind guys I will see you in the next video


In the Marseilles shale wells are typically drilled northwest and southeast. Why is that? That is controlled by the tectonic stress to which the Appalachian basin is subject. The tectonic stress is in an orientation in eastern North America of east northeast and west southwest so that if a lateral is drilled at right angles to that stress the fractures themselves will propagate toward the maximum horizontal stress, the east northeast and west southwest directions. And the idea of course is the most productive wells are the ones that will have the most fractures and one can create the most fractures by drilling that lateral at right angles to the tectonic stress in the Appalachian basin.


I apologize to everybody now. The way that I do presentations and my cadence and speech is probably a little bit different than folks are used to. But at the very least, I hope you're entertained. So it is exactly 11.45. So we should go ahead and get started. So we are here to continue talking about Envoy. Specifically, I'm going to talk, or Bill and myself are going to be talking about some of the open SSL handling that we've been doing within Envoy. And to kind of get into this a little bit, that's me. Folks tend to call me Redbeard. Redbeard is not my given name, but if anyone can help me understand why I get called that, that might be useful. Many years ago, I worked in the consulting division of Red Hat, where I was the subject matter expert on a whole bunch of different topics, including OpenShift before it utilized Kubernetes. Then I left Red Hat and helped to get a company called CoroS off the ground, where I was the chief architect. And I did a little bit of everything. And I love talking about Kubernetes. So if anybody, I'm very slow to respond to email, but if anybody wants to kind of talk to me on WeChat or anything like that, happy to take the time and take it from there. And at this point, I would like to introduce this lovely gentleman to stage left. His name is Bill DeCoste. Hi, everybody. I'm Bill DeCoste. I got a kick out of this picture, because this was also taken back in the OpenShift V2 days pre-Kubernetes, pre-containers. That picture's really old. So I've been at Red Hat for, I actually came over with a J-Boss acquisition. So it's probably 14 years now. I've been around for a while. And I've been the worker B, the engineer who's done the actual development on replacing boring SSL in Envoy and Istio Proxy with Red Hat, the sort of Red Hat certified open SSL libraries. So as mentioned, we are both from Red Hat. We are here to talk about a piece of software, or here to talk about work done on a CNCF project, specifically Envoy. I should hope that you picked up on this being about Envoy. If that wasn't obvious, there's gradually not too much I can do for you. But let's start out, Act 1s. This is a bit of a kind of circuitous route. So this is actually the tale of two cryptographic libraries. These topics may sound boring. If so, let's blame it on the reason Bill and I are even here talking to you today, which is specifically a library called Boring SSL. So if you're like me, you probably find cryptography pretty interesting. Hopefully, during the course of this presentation, some of the nuances we'll be talking about will shed light on how one library can actually matter so much. We'll also be talking about open SSL and the differences between that and boring SSL. We'll need to, if we're going to make any sense out of this. So where are we going with this? For many folks, the differences between these two pieces of software lies somewhere between being transparent and irrelevant. This may even lead you to be asking where I'm actually going with this. Is this even important? There's a lot of great content that's happening here today. And if you don't care about the nuances between boring SSL and open SSL, I'd ask that you seek out a talk that actually resonates with you. But for the folks that do stick around, I'm sure that some of this will be interesting, even if you still don't think it's important by the end. But I've digressed a bit. Let's get everything back on track and go back in time. Specifically, we're going to go back to the 1990s, a more simple time before encryption on the worldwide web. So 1990s, Netscape brought us SSL, secure socket layers. The intention was actually just to make consumers comfortable with using their credit card on the actual internet. Then, after that, we end up with TLS. So the successor to SSL was TLS, or transport layer security. While TLS made modest attempts at being backwards compatible prior to TLS version 1.3, it was fundamentally different technology. One of the most important differences is that all operations, both clear and protected in TLS, happen over a single port. And that connection upgrades to secure communications. And SSL and TLS are fundamentally different. This means that there was never really any interoperability between those, which caused a number of problems. The biggest of which, in my opinion, is specifically that SSL and TLS are often conflated. In practice, you pick one, or you pick the other, with the majority of web components today using TLS. Predating all of this, though, we have two other sets of standards, PKCS and X509. PKCS stands for Public Key Cryptography Standards. And these were all introduced by a company called RSA Corporation. PKCS were not industry standards. They were there to promote the products from RSA. Fortunately, they paved the way for a pretty broad range of standards we use across computing, like message encryption, transport encryption, and secure time stamping, et cetera. I am going to get a drink of water here. Helps if I don't try to drink the mic. So PKCS-1, this is actually relevant, though, like I said, it's curious. Defines a standardized set of grammar for the mathematics and formatting of RSA keys. PKCS-7 defines the basis for the subsequent cryptographic message syntax, or CMS, which is the IETF standard for securing messages on the internet. CMS is currently ratified in RFC 5652. Beyond that, we've got PKCS-12. It's a container format used to encapsulate public and private key material. Gets used a lot for bundling those public and private keys with things like Java key stores, and it's also known as a PFX file, and gets used by Microsoft Outlook, and web browsers, and a whole bunch of other things. The big thing to remember, it's a container format so that you can bundle the assets together. But it is not that type of container format parallel to all of this. As mentioned, in addition to the set of PKCS standards, we have X509. X509 predates SSL by almost a decade. This is a thing before Netscape kind of assembled this so that folks could put credit cards on the internet. In the end, it's really just an encoding mechanism. It was built on top the ideas of public key cryptography and utilizes ASN1 syntax behind the scenes. Now, as we realize that X509 is just a structuring and a grouping mechanism, it should start becoming clear that X509 is independent of an orthogonal to SSL and TLS. Sure, both SSL and TLS utilize X509, but X509 can also be utilized without SSL and TLS. Why does it matter? We're five, 10 minutes in, and I've thrown a wall of acronyms at you. You're probably asking yourself.  Why does this matter? Unfortunately, it does matter. A lot of these terms are thrown around, and folks pretend that they're interchangeable. In some ways, they can be. But if we can't agree on what we're talking about, it makes it harder to understand. At the same time, once we understand them, it unlocks a world of prior art, allowing us to stand on the shoulders of those who have come before us. This is because standards are important. Less than 10 minutes of clarification can unlock a world of making all of you more effective. It's an obvious choice to me, because these standards, which provide interoperability, and the interoperability is what makes it possible for even a small team of people to unravel this work. So where do we end up with? With boring SSL and open SSL and all of this. Ultimately, the way that we got here, the reason why these exist, comes down to Heartbleed. Heartbleed and Google. So after Heartbleed was released, a collaboration began on a fork of open SSL. The intention was to provide a fork of SSL that had been put on a diet, removing large swaths of code to make it more straightforward for the average user to understand. In addition, it became doubly pressing, because the threats to Google presented by the US government. In parallel to this, it is important to note that Google's desire to create boring SSL stems, does not stem, from actively vulnerable code. It just, it's there, or it was more that they wanted to make it hard for users to know. Sorry, I wrote all of these notes in to make it easier for the translator. And I've lost my place. It makes it hard, yeah, the complexity of open SSL makes it hard for users to know what they're implementing is objectively correct. They were maintaining an increasingly large patch set on open SSL and decided that they'd had enough. At Red Hat, completely unrelated to Google, we have to make decisions for millions of customers, not just one customer. Google has more or less one customer, their internal users. We have users that care about many, many different things, and for us, one bug doesn't justify throwing out years of expertise, tooling, et cetera. So, enter lift, and by lift, I actually mean Twitter, because none of this is straightforward. Twitter had invested a lot of time and effort developing the ideas that we commonly call a service mesh. Matt Klein and some other folks, William from Boyant and some of the folks, formerly not from Tetrate, what was the other service mesh company that was working on Envoy? I can't remember their name. There were a bunch of folks at Twitter who all worked on service mesh tooling, but the majority of it was never open sourced. So the developers all, when they left Twitter, had to start over and reimplement all of these ideas. So at lift, Matt started working on the proxy server that he wished he had when he worked at Twitter. And that was Envoy. And Envoy actually began its life with open SSL. But then, specifically, issue number 152, we end up with replace open SSL with boring SSL. And we have this kind of decision coming in from Matt. And he says, I mainly wanted to switch, because I know that you all, meaning Google, will help make sure we are up to date and secure if we happen to use boring SSL. And Pioter says, well, there's no reason why we can't support both. They're mostly API compatible. Fair enough. Sounds reasonable. Personally, I like that. Being able to maintain or have the Google folks maintain what matters to them, other parts of the community maintain what matters to them is perfect. Unfortunately, time is a fickle mistress, because then we get to issue number 3404, where it gets called out that the answer around adding back support for open SSL is absolutely not. They're migrating completely away from it. Folks from Akamai made this request, because this is the things that they need. And this is where the Faustian bargain comes in. Why would the project decide to make such a turn? Well, to look at that, we actually have to look at the charter of boring SSL, which is that it is designed to meet Google's needs. And while it is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as open SSL is. They do not recommend that third parties depend on it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating, because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability, which Bill will touch on a little bit. Merlin lies the challenge. Switch was made to the project, which is not necessarily aligned around what we traditionally think of as community. It's aligned around the interests and expertise of a single corporation. It's understandable, though. And I don't fault Google for it. When the community was much smaller, it made sense to consolidate around the opinions and needs of the specific groups maintaining specific pieces. But as we grow the project, the nuances of other members of the community become more apparent. And this is why we need stewards who understand the technology. That's why the knowledge of the standards and how they work are important, which is where we get into Act 2. So at Red Hat, we have products and we have projects that we collaborate on. This is how we balance supporting the things that we sell as a company and the kind of things that we give away for free to our users. This means every product has one or more upstreams. In the case of OpenShift Service Mesh, the product, we compose a number of projects together. So this is going to be the open source projects Istio, Keali, Yeager, Prometheus, et cetera. Envoy is the upstream for Istio proxy, but Envoy is not Istio proxy. And I don't want to focus on Istio, since this is a cloud native con talk, and Istio is not a cloud native computing foundation project, but it carries a patch set atop Envoy to create the component Istio proxy. So there are some differences here, and Bill is going to spend a few minutes talking to us about these changes, or the changes that brought the Istio patches along. And now, we're from Bill. Okay, can everybody hear me? Yep. Okay, so when I first started doing this about a year ago, and I'll talk about sort of why we did what we did and how we did what we did to bring OpenSSL into Envoy, our sort of mandate was Istio proxy, but 99% of Istio proxy is really Envoy. The core of it is really Envoy. However, there are some pieces that if you go take a look at the source up in GitHub under Istio proxy, there are some additions that they drop on top of Envoy that are Istio-specific functionality. The couple that kind of come to mind is some SNI functionality in there, and these are all the SSL TLS-specific ones for SNI, and also for JSON web tokens for JWT. Those are the two pieces. However, over time, just over the last year that I've been working on this, I've seen a whole bunch of that stuff, particularly the JWT stuff, get pulled out of proxy because now Envoy is doing it natively. So I think the differences over time, I've seen shrink, but I think the distinction that Redbeard made is really important because a lot of people think that Istio proxy is exactly the same as Envoy, and there are some, code-wise, they're relatively small, but I think they're significant, but over time, they're becoming kind of less and less. So my kind of plea to folks is to ask questions, but really, why does Red Hat care? Envoy, Istio proxy, why does it matter what SSL library is actually used? Tragically, it matters because of this word salad. So within the US, there's this thing called, actually the US and Canada, it's called the Federal Information Processing Standards, document number 140, revision number two, also known as FIPS 140-2, what? So the correct look for this is a glassy eyed stare dreaming of something far less boring than government regulation, but FIPS 140, or FIPS defines the standards around the agencies of the federal government, around the way the agencies of the federal government handle information processing. Specifically, FIPS 140-2 focuses on cryptographic mechanisms and more importantly, may and may not be used. Beyond that, it also gets into the details of how random number generators can work, how tamper evidence and tamper proof mechanisms work on hardware devices, et cetera. Beyond that, many governments and private companies adopt the guidance of FIPS 140-2 either because they do business with the US government or the Canadian government or because they just don't want to reinvent a wheel. So aspects of security divisions within smaller governments will often just go, okay, we're going to download all of the documents for FIPS, we will start from there and then we will make the changes, the patches to the document that we need that way. So even other nation states use these standards as a rubric for developing their own guidelines. So some examples here, FIPS 140-2 defines things like, hey, you can use AES, which is really some opinionated RSA, you can use certain types of ECC, but you can't use DES. You can't use triple DES with less than three keys. You can't use RSA with less than 2048 bits. So that means, you know, things like ed25519, you can't use it. Despite the fact that it may be more secure, you may not use it because it has not been proven that way. So this all seems completely reasonable, like, but if you change the code, you have to recertify it. I'll repeat that again. If you change the code, you have to recertify with an independent auditor to re-get your FIPS certification. It's kinda weird.  Certification is conducted by these independent auditors that are contracted by the vendor who produces the software. Due to this, it generally takes a minimum of three to six months and can cost over $100,000. So again, three to six months and can cost over $100,000 any time you make a code change. At Red Hat, we have an answer to this. That enables us to work around it a little bit. It's called the OpenSSL capsule. So it's a special way of running OpenSSL which allows us to simplify this. It separates OpenSSL into two halves. When OpenSSL was running capsule mode, we express OpenSSL as multiple discrete components. This means that all of the cryptographic code, which for example implements the mathematics behind RSA, live in one binary while the code that handles the sending heartbeat packets in a malformed way lives in another separate shared object. This means that the cryptographic code can be certified and only needs to be recertified if something wasn't implemented correctly, mathematically. This is actually critical for our certification workflow. By doing this, it allows us to certify and audit that single binary for almost all Red Hat products. By running the system, literally booting the kernel with FIPS equals one, you tell the kernel, the Golang binaries, Apache HTTPD, OpenShift, Ansible, you name it, to bypass any internal cryptographic mechanisms that they have and instead use the OpenSSL capsule. It also means we don't have teams building their own cryptographic implementations and potentially messing that up. So important points to note out about this. FIPS mode, it is not used by default. When enabled, it affects the kernel, Go, and other binaries. But enough about that. You've been listening to me talk about the non-technical things, which I'm sure that's not why any of you are here. So let's hear some more from Bill about the changes that were required and who else was involved. Thanks, Red Bird. Okay, so what I wanna cover, I'm gonna go through maybe five or six slides. And please, if there's questions, please jump in. What I really wanna cover is what we've done with Envoy, why we did it, why we Red Hat did it. Because it's not as simple as just going and sort of being able to plug in OpenSSL instead of boring SSL. We've got some, if you go and kind of dig around in the code. Who here, let me back up. Who here has actually built Envoy? Like on a download of the Envoy source and built it. One, two, three. Okay, it is, it really is. Especially if you've been doing Istio, right? Istio builds really, really easy and building Envoy is not trivial. So there's a couple, when you go and take a look at the changes that we've made that I'm gonna reference a whole bunch of Git repositories. Everything is all open and available that we've done. So you can go take a look at it and see what we've done. You can go run the exact same thing and replace all of the boring SSL with OpenSSL. I'm actually gonna step down if that's okay. Can you guys see me back there? But what I wanna cover is what we've done, why we did it and sort of where we're going forward with the upstream community because I think that's the most important thing. And we've gained, as I mentioned, I've been doing this for about a year, but over the last several months, we've really gained a lot of momentum, I think, because it's not just Red Hat. There's a lot of other companies, organizations that are interested in kind of the work that we're doing are being able to plug OpenSSL into Envoy or Istio proxy. I'll just talk about Envoy, but it applies just as well to Istio's proxy. That they're also interested in for various reasons of running OpenSSL instead of boring SSL. And these are sort of Red Hats of priorities, right? Our current focus right now is on Istio proxy, but there's a lot of stuff going on too that maybe is pure Envoy. But what we need to do as Red Hat is support the REL version for the reasons that Brian just mentioned, for FIPS and for other reasons, we need to support OpenSSL because that's the component that we have our expertise in. We've got contributors there. That's what we're comfortable supporting. Going and supporting a whole nother crypto standard is opens up a whole ton of risk for us as a company. Okay, so hopefully that's enough about sort of Red Hat as a company. FIPS, he just talked about boring SSL over maybe six months ago, actually became FIPS compliant, so that's become sort of less of an issue. But what we needed to do is be able to take Envoy, completely remove all of the boring SSL. If you go and build Envoy, it pulls in, there's this wonderful tool called Bazel. There's maybe some smirks out there from the people who have used it. It's a tool that Google created that will build almost anything, sort of regardless of language, it's a port, it's Java and Go and C++ and all sorts of other things to go and build whatever kind of software you've got and pull in all the dependencies and manage all the dependencies. So if you go and kind of take this, run Bazel, it'll go and pull in all these dependencies, boring SSL being one of them. When it pulls in boring SSL, we need to go and completely strip that out. We can't, Red Hat needs to go and have a sort of a whole separate build. We need to pull in all the software and build it completely offline so that we know whatever we ship or whatever we provide, we know where all that source is and we can sort of tag it and go look, this is all the source, it's not sort of online pulling in dependencies, right?  The build, all the build tools, all the dependencies, all the dependencies of dependencies and anyway build the whole tree. It's a great tool, but it also can be a little complex. It's really powerful, but it can be complex. We also use a different build tool set for those same kind of reasons as what they run upstream. So if you go and go take a look at the CI that Envoy runs upstream, they use kind of a whole different sort of build tools, different versions of the compiler and that sort of thing. They also, and this is sort of another interesting conversation that came up over the last couple of weeks, is if you go take, boring SSL as Brian mentioned is very dynamic, right? It's changing all the time. The APIs change all the time because it's really targeted in a different sort of set of use cases. In a lot of cases, then open SSL is. But Envoy doesn't care because they dynamically link in boring SSL, right? They're not, excuse me, they statically link in boring SSL into their Envoy binary. So they don't really care if this stuff all they're changing. If there's, sitting on the operating system, there's another set of libraries of boring SSL because they've statically linked everything. It's all bundled up into their one sort of Envoy binary and that's it. So you get the version of boring SSL that's gonna work for that version of Envoy and they're good. And that makes perfect sense. Our case is a little bit different. We actually wanna go and have Envoy use the underlying crypto libraries that are provided by the operating system so that we can switch out the operating system and then Envoy will automatically go and pick up the crypto libraries. A little, do you have a clicker? Thanks. Okay, so Maestra is the community project name for what Red Hat's been doing with Istio. Think of this as just sort of a fork. It's our community. If you think of OpenShift Origin, people here are familiar with OpenShift? Yeah, okay. So if you think of OpenShift, Kubernetes is sort of the upstream origin is the community version that Red Hat's behind. That's sort of an extension of Kubernetes. And then similarly, OpenShift Container Platform is our product that Red Hat sells. If you go think of the same way, Maestra, which is where in GitHub all the stuff lives, all the work that we've done is analogous to Origin. This is all the community stuff that we go and do builds for Istio. Images and builds and all that stuff is up there. Again, this is talking about Istio but it all really does apply directly to Envoy because 99% of the work is Envoy, not Istio. Right now, if anybody wants to go and take a look and run any of the proxy, all the stuff's available. 0.11 is the current tag that's out there. That's the first release that actually has OpenSSL. All the previous releases were running the boring SSL. And you can see the versions there that correspond to the upstream. The images that we're shipping are now UBI-based. So there's a kind of universal-based image, right? So that's the Linux version that sits underneath all these images. And we're also working with, Red Hat as a company is contributing a whole bunch of stuff to both Envoy and Istio but the key piece is what we've been working for over a year now with upstream to do everything we can to go get as much as possible, pluggable, easily pluggable in upstream. The upstream, and I think we're kind of getting to a pretty happy place for everybody. The upstream wants to keep moving as fast as possible. Envoy's moving incredibly quickly, boring SSL's moving fairly quickly. So they don't want to slow down the additions to Envoy by having their developers have to go and support and become experts in potentially two different crypto APIs and two different crypto libraries. And that makes perfect sense. We had originally discussed, actually coming up with an abstraction layer for all of the crypto that you could plug into. And the decision was made that because boring SSL it has diverged and it's gonna continue to diverge at a pretty good rate from open SSL that it doesn't really make any sense. It would put on such a burden for Envoy developers to go and continue to move forward and add features to Envoy that have nothing to do with crypto that they'd have to become experts in both of those and have to deal with this API. Maintaining the API for the crypto abstraction would become sort of a nightmare over time. So what we've decided to do is kind of take a kind of a least common denominator of what we can pull out of the core of Envoy and move that into extensions. And that work, we've done a lot of that and we're going to continue to do that so that anything that really touches the SSL libraries is now going to live in extensions and hopefully becomes fairly pluggable. Okay, next one? Wow, this time went by fast. Okay, so we've pulled out right now if you go take a look at what's up in Envoy, there's been a, we've had a whole bunch of PRs that have been merged that pulls almost every all of the crypto stuff out of the core and now lives in extensions. And the bulk of that right now is in transport socket and the TLS listener, 90%, maybe 95%. There's a couple of things right now that are in common and one of the challenges that I personally have had and Brian has talked about this is upstream is moving so fast that there's lots and lots of developers and companies that will go and add new code in and every time we'll go grab the latest version, stuff is leaked back in, right? So, and I'll have to go back and they're against a boring SSL API and they break the work that we've done and have to go back and refactor all the replacement work. So this is, it's been sort of a cyclical process but I can kind of see the light at the end of the tunnel at this point. A perfect example of that is for the quick protocol. They recently went and added support. They've had support for quick but they actually pull in Kishnau which is a library from Chrome that the Chrome guys came up with that has very specific boring SSL. They're including, include boring SSL slash blah, blah, like it's very, it's not even open SSL slash something that happens to be a boring SSL library. They're really specifically got in the code boring SSL. So this is a problem for us. But this is sort of just one of the challenges we've got because there are dependencies that the Envoy pulls in that do have a boring SSL dependencies. Here's the really, the good news. This is last Friday, right? If you'll get the date on Friday, the upstream guys, Matt Klein agreed to, they have opened, there's now a repository for open SSL Envoy that they're gonna go, we're gonna go and put all the work that we've done up there and every time there's a merge into Envoy, they're gonna go trigger a CI build of the open SSL extension. They're not gonna stop anybody. It's not gonna block a merge if it fails but it's gonna start to flag stuff, right? So, and this is huge, right? Because then if you have a conscientious developer who goes and says, hey, I went and maybe I shouldn't have leaked this SSL code. I put it in the wrong place. They'll probably accept my merge because I wanna keep things moving but maybe I can rework my pull request, right? And put it maybe where it belongs. And so that's a big one for us. This is literally what I'm gonna be doing next week. It's going actually populating that because if you go look at the repository, it's empty because I've been on a plane coming here since the repository was created but this is kinda really big news for us. Okay, next one, down to three minutes. These are all just sort of for reference, right? So what we've done is for each one of the components and for each one of the dependencies, we've gone and created sort of a similar pattern of how to replace the boring SSL with all the open SSL. So we've got sort of a process on the next slide and we're probably not gonna have time because I'll give a couple of minutes for questions. But what happens is, yeah, can you hit the next one? And this is where we, two other repositories where we've had to go and create, it became so problematic to go in and talk directly to the open SSL API for what they can do in boring SSL that we've had to sort of simulate some boring SSL functionality on top of open SSL and that's what these two guys are. But so what happens is we'll go and pull an envoy and we run a script for each one of the core components and from each one of the dependencies and that will go and update, it'll change the Bazel configuration for the build, it'll go pull out all the boring SSL specifics, replace it with the open SSL, the corresponding open SSL code and then kind of go do the whole build. So this is definitely for reference and the kind of key point of all this is if you're interested, all this stuff is upstream, it's all available, it's all in Maestra, up in GitHub and hopefully very, very soon, like by the end of this week, a lot of this, by the end of next week, hopefully a lot of this stuff will be in actually Envoy Proxy upstream and it'll be available there and be hooked into their CI soon thereafter. I think we've got one minute. Okay, so Bill has documented the placement process here and talked a little bit about that. We are going to publish the slides on the schedule. I do want to take a second to say this work is not just being done by Red Hat, as you saw, there was the request from folks at Akamai for this sort of support, there's also some support coming from Intel and VMware. You know, there are a number of organizations that want to see this for very similar reasons as the FIPS reasons that we talked about. So to summarize what we've been talking about here today, the choice of SSL or TLS implementation that you use has profound effects, understand why you're making the choice that you are and join us in helping to work on this and collaborate. Thank you very, very much. Very honored to present you here today. Yeah, thank you. And I just want to sort of exaggerate that Red Hat, everybody saying that everything that it's going on here is not vendor-specific, right? And when it was just Red Hat, well, we need open SL, we need open upstream, really doesn't care, right? That's one vendor saying we really didn't get any momentum until VMware and Intel and all these other guys said, hey, they've got their own reasons, they're different from Red Hats, but there's sort of enough commonality right now that there's enough momentum gaining, now we've got a repo right up in Envoy Proxy because I really wouldn't thank those guys. And if there's anybody who has the sort of the same open SL kind of drivers for who you're working for, please let us know and get involved because the more and more people, the more momentum we can get for getting an open SSL upstream, the better. Thank you. Yeah, thank you.


Hi everyone. Yeah, I'm a dumb. I forgot the the box that I'm giving away right here $300 value 2020 certified football box. We're gonna ship that to you sealed whoever wins that you got to buy at least two teams in the break Two teams one entry four teams two entries six teams three entries, etc. Etc. Thanks again to these folks for getting into the action Really appreciate it. So Let's alphabetize by your first names here So Aaron bought two that's an entry Aaron Salinas Adam bought two that's an entry Cascade bought four. That's two entries EA bought two. That's an entry EJ bought two. That's an entry. I See bought two. That's an entry Joseph L. Bought two. That's an entry Nick Galvin bought two that's an entry Ronnie bought two. That's an entry and Mr. Goodman bought two that is an entry. So that's 11 spots right there one out of 11 Chance to get the box not bad name on top after seven lucky seven. Good luck one two three And seventh and final time name on top is gonna be Ronnie last spot mojo. There you go after seven You've got a sealed box of 2020 certified football going your way if you you can sell it if you want to but if you end up opening it Definitely, let us know if you get anything cool. Alright. Thanks a lot. We'll see you next time. Jasper's case breaks.com


Former Vice President Atiku Abobuka has declared his intention to run for the office of Nigerian President, making it the sixth time he will be aspiring for the office. Atiku, the presidential candidate of the People's Democratic Party, PDP in the 2019 general election, announced his decision at the International Conference Center in Abuja. The former vice president will contest the PDP presidential candidacy tickets alongside former Senate President Bukala Saraki, Ovation Magazine publisher Deli Mamadu, Sokoto State Governor Amin Utambua, Paios Ayim, and other aspirants that will be joining the race.