What's going on everybody? Welcome to another match preview. We are going through the quarter finals of Wimbledon. We're finally here It's in the second week of Wimbledon. We're finally at the quarter final stages And we're gonna be going through Federer versus Nishikori and see how they've gone on a side note Nishikori's made his fifth grand slam quarter final in a row So the last five grand slams including this one. He's made the quarter finals So we'll go through the row to the quarter finals so far for both players. We'll start with Federer So as you can see best result here, we know how many times he's won this. He's won this eight times before He's an absolute dominant force at Wimbledon And as you can see last time he won it was in 2017 Against Marin Chilich and injured Marin Chilich, but still he won the trophy in 2017 first round He lost the first set against a young South African Lloyd Harris Very shockingly because a lot of people thought that Federer was gonna wipe through the competition His draw was actually pretty easy compared to someone like Nadal So it was very interesting to see him lose the first set But then as you can see there after that he dominated in that match and continued to dominate all the way up until this stage So he beat Clark in the second round a young wild card from the UK He beat Luca Pui in the third round not a great performance by Federer But still enough to get him through and then Baratini was the huge shock I thought for sure that Baratini massive you know massive serve massive ground strokes good form on grass courts I think it was 13 or 14 wins on the grass in this short season Federer put him away in about an hour and a half, and it was a little less than an hour and a half It was one of the clothes. I think it was the fastest match That's in a win in a Wimbledon or a Grand Slam fourth round men's match So super quick Baratini out in very quick sets and now he's playing Nishikori in the next round Let's go see what Nishikori has done so far. So like I said Nishikori has made his fifth Grand Slam quarter-final in a row which is a huge achievement very consistent over the last 18 months But as you can see he's only dropped the one set he won against Montero in the first round Brazilian player he beat Nori in the second round really easily in that third set Then Johnson was coming off a five-set match and he beat him in straight sets I thought maybe there was a little bit of danger there and then against Kukushkin Dominated lost the second set but dominated the rest of the match So Nishikori's only dropped a set Federer's only dropped a set up until this point Let's look at their head-to-head because it gets really interesting in in their head-to-head So as you can see the last time they played Nishikori actually won that match So it's 7-3 overall in favor of Federer no surprise there Everyone would assume that Federer is the favorite against most players and has a winning record against most players But Nishikori won their last meeting. It was at the ATP finals last year in London And a huge win there. They actually played I think three tournaments in a row Paris Masters the last week of the 2018 season and Shanghai was a month before that So they played three weeks, you know within probably a month of each other very very close you know In in time and it's very interesting to see that Nishikori could overcome those losses against Federer and somehow beat him in London The last time they played Nishikori served at 76% of first serves So he's gonna have to serve really well against Federer on the grass courts He's gonna have to serve within the 70s to 80 range Definitely needs to do that last time they played Federer only had two breakpoints and he couldn't convert So very interesting to see Federer didn't have many chances against Nishikori So again Nishikori needs to limit the opportunities for Federer if he's a chance of winning this match Then you can see last round when Nishikori played in the fourth round He had fifth he won five of thirteen break points We had a lot of opportunities against Kokushkin, but he couldn't take all the opportunities It was enough to get him through but still he's gonna have to convert a lot of break points Especially because Federer is not gonna give him that many he's gonna have to convert all the break points He gets and in the last round Federer only hit Five unforced errors. So very very clean hitting from Federer. I didn't you know one in about what? 75 minutes or something like that So yeah only hit five errors within that time frame as well So Nishikori is gonna have to hope that Federer is not playing the same quality of tennis He was in the fourth round. So let's talk about who's gonna win this match now as you can see 7-3 head-to-head record It's a tough one. It's a tough one because Federer is coming off a pretty good win Federer hasn't looked great on this, you know during when wouldn't he's had a couple of tough matches Pui You know he won in straight sets, but it looked a little bit on the score a little bit tighter than it was Then it you know it's actually pretty tight when you look at the stats and stuff like that And Nishikori's had a really good tournament so far, but even though Nishikori's had a really good tournament so far. I Can't go past Roger Federer. I think that he had the easiest draw probably with Novak Djokovic easiest draw to this point Baratini was a good win as well Baratini in that straight sets after what I said Baratini coming off one of the best Grass court seasons of any player this year and he put him away like he was you know not meant to play on the grass court So I think Federer is gonna win this match I think Federer's just got too many weapons on the grass against Nishikori. Maybe a hard court I'd make it a little bit more 50-50 and try maybe give Nishikori a set But I can't see Nishikori beating Federer here. I can't see him I can get it maybe get him a give him a set But I don't think he can beat him on the grass courts of Wimbledon So that's the quarterfinal for Nishikori versus Federer stick around because we are gonna do all the quarterfinals Make sure you subscribe to the channel if you haven't already like the video and I'll see you guys in the next one


Nice guy. Oh. Yo, crazy! Hooray! We did it, yay! That's not a gem chat. But it's okay. I've got like, I think 10 Wyvern gems now. So... They might last a little bit. You got a nice chunk from that one, cool. We can repeat it. The Argus he has returned, let me see what this guy has. I gotta change, cause I need money. See today's wares? I'll take that. I'm always taking consumables. What is this? Any? Oh, that's more consumables, alright. So let's change this to... I need trade ends. We'll do two trade ends and one consumables. Yeah boy, I need some money! Hmm. I could probably upgrade my armor. I got a little bit of jump change. I want to max out that coil. Let's go ahead and do that. And everything else can wait. What's I'm making? Hmm, hmm, hmm, hmm, hmm, hmm. Oh, it is maxed. Kappa! Um, I gotta come up with another charm to... 17k to max. 24k to max. My name will come. Jubilis has posted a quest. Uh, stamina is huge. Y'all could probably get a horn with a buff. Nah, nah, nah. Nah! Nah! Nah dude, it's okay. I left a quest. Or you left a quest. Somebody left a quest. It wasn't me. Okay, what'd you say? I didn't do it. I'm in the quest, but I'm not in the quest. Hmm. That's a cute game. That's so cute. No, no, I'm in, I'm in, I'm in, I'm in. I'm in. I'm in. Did people get DC? Ah, something weird happened there. Yeah, yeah. We got DC'd, sir. Let's remake. Let's remake the session. That was weird, man. I joined the quest and it was like, nope, kicking you. I will remake a session and update the session ID and all that stuff. There it is. New session is in chat. Hello, I showered and now my hair is wet. Even though I spent 10 minutes drying it with a blow-dryer. And I don't know what to do. Why have I been forsaken? Well, there's this monster called Arjunath. That you can ask for his opinion on your hair.  You won't have to worry about wet hair anymore. Arjunath, that's the Arjunath. Arjunath. That's Arjunath. He could take care of that hair thing. That hair problem. We're wonders. Let's try this again. Speaking of potatoes, check on dinner. Hey, babe, are this all we're going with? Mine is still having some issues connecting. I have to hunt HR or Angie. It killed my entire squad. You probably should solo him, man. Because I found that he's easier to solo. Yeah, we can go with three. This is easy. I'll be less potatoes since mine isn't here. We will do the thing with the stuff. I'll take a stand potion, aka the juice of dash. Yeah, sometimes it does that. I don't know why. It's annoying. There he is. I will shoot them with bull. God, dang it. I'm trying to hit that. There it is.  Hey, buddy. Would you? All right, we're good. Let's get this mud off of him. Some demon. Oh, I'll wait for everybody to get here before I drop the powder. Yeah, the move from the spot. This is kind of hilarious. It's kind of funny. Jerk, how are you doing, dude? I'm gonna get rammed here. Oh, that hurt. That felt good. I like it. I saw the tail and I was like, I better move out of the way of that. They just stood there. I got the tip of it. Oh, you know what? If I put on my coatings, I'll do more damage chat. Put that out there. The thing. It's the thing with video games. The thing is I put them on it and I just immediately take them back off. It's just kind of dumb. On my part. That's better. Better damage numbers there. Oh, my watch called war. Damn guy. Oh, mine that? I'm not in that good. I can't be the only one who saw that. That dude rubber band hard right there. I was like, what in the world? Jim, what me? Are we going to fight a chicken? Where be the chicken? Hmm. I don't know what you're talking about, Zinkra. When I gather, I hold down the button. That's guarantees the fastest gather. Thank you, sweetie. Our being when the name of it flashes, my nose sponsors name flashes. I just hold it down. When you when it flashes, you sure about that? Everybody I know who's anybody who's everybody just holds the button now. I don't know if there's a mini game with that or whatever, but so I guess. No, I don't do that. The answer would be no. I think he's at the Southwest. No, he's where am I? Okay. Going the right way. Are you going nuts? I don't know, man. I mean, I could comment on that as a separate statement. You probably are, but you know, I don't have evidence right now, but I just hold it down. I think it's I think we are. Yeah, I know I got paralysis coding on. It's working. It's working. The poor chicken doesn't have a chance yet. Kind of sad. Oh, that was weird. Hand them off at the past. You thought you were leaving. I want to play Warframe so bad right now, but they suspended my account for negative platinum. But when I look at my workroom account, I'm at positive. I also made a ticket. We owe negative platinum means you. May have traded with somebody who had bad platinum doesn't mean you have negative platinum. It means that you probably traded with somebody who has the fraudulent stuff. It's a common thing. Sadly, sadly, it's common. They usually get you resolved in a couple of a couple days. A week sounds kind of long, but don't wear. Dung. No, I wanted to Dung. That is not a gym. Although I'm not farming any gyms. It's just nice to get them. You're at 90%. Good. I thought I was petting him chat.  I'm like, man, this is as long as I've ever pet this thing. The tale writer Safari has returned. Wow. That's amazing news. I wonder what trinkets and baubles they bought brought back from their adventures in the Safari. Mmm. Escalation point session idea in chat if you want to join. That's a lot of clicks together. If you count the clicks it takes to get on the quest. Oh my. It's something else, boy. It's crazy. Your next incro. You're going to be at this point. The almighty Rathian footprints. You might already be at it. You already passed the footprints.   You're already a high rank. You're already a high rank, huh? That's right. I was actually responded to your discord message when you say you're. I'm a terrible problem. Yeah. I should know these things. Read each other. Nice. Oh, he's steamed. Oh, two for one, two for one, two for one. He's right there. Come here. Yes. Flash him. I'm gonna flash him chat. Put that rock down. I'll work on him. Oh, the birds are here. Chat record time, chat record time, record time, record time, record time, record time. Oh, man. It's dropping pods everywhere. Got a gym. That's my that's my victory screech right there. Chat may have heard it on such so just Nickelodeon Disney XD and on boomerang. I may have killed half the birds in one shot. You're going to have nightmares about it. If you don't figure this out, sir, you're crazy. It's done, Sam. It's done. Cool. I'm going to add something to my wishlist. Sam. Dean. Sammy. Sam. Oh, so what am I to do for my dude? I got Diablo for the. I guess that might be good enough for now. The Diablo set for my HPG because it has a stagger Diablo Alpha. I guess I can work on getting the beta, but I'm be honest with you. I don't want to farm Diablo this week. I've seen enough of him. It's kind of I've seen enough of him for a little bit. So I got a wishlist something though. Speed sharpening. I guess I could look at another weapon now. Yeah, I should wishlist charmed you're right. There's so many. I do want one with conditioning on it. Whatever one has this one Constitution, right? I can do. Oh, no. Oh, the Geron Jim. Oh, the other Geron Jim. That's awful free only good for a war to bow, but not much else.


Computers keep changing the world, but their power and safety is limited by their rigid design. The T2 Tile project works for bigger and safer computing using living systems principles. Follow our progress here on T Tuesday Updates. I'm Dave Ackley. This is the 20th T Tuesday Update. Let's get into it. Ten weeks ago I set a goal of having a grid of these tiles, these incremental computing elements that you can plug into the copies of itself to have 133 of them manufactured and running by today. Failed big time at that. Did get a lot of progress done. What I want to do today rather than setting another, you know, five-year plan, ten-week plan, mostly I just want to talk about what happened last week because that's actually, you know, that's sort of what's real. But there is stuff about the next couple of weeks coming up, so I'll talk about that as well. Okay, so we had a bunch of, we had most of the parts we're in, the parts that we're missing were these through-hole parts, the things that connect one thing to another. And we last week found this company, 4Ucon, 4Ucon, 4Uconnector.com, via Adafruit, from their datasheet that was there. But they were in Spring Festival. That's done in China at this point, so they're back. I started getting in touch with them. I tried to price up an order for the intertile connectors that we need, 1200 of them, if we're saying a max build of 200, which is probably going to be more than we're actually going to do. But we'll see. We need 1200 of these, 600 times 200, plus the two main P8 and P9 connectors that we actually connect the big bones to the board with need about 600 of those. I'm sorry, I need about 400 of those, buying 1,000 because that's the minimum order quantity. Sent a mail to them saying, is there any way that we could reduce this minimum order quantity of 5,000 for the intertile connectors down to something more like 1200 that I actually need? So I proposed to buy 2,000 of them and said, you know, is there any way that we could do that with a higher price or something? And I sent it off. I didn't even wait for an answer. I went on and started buying other stuff. I need to get like 800 of the socket cap screws to screw the cases onto the boards. Found a guy on AliExpress, sent him a mail. His webpage said, if you wanted large quantity, get in touch. He'll get you some kind of discount, so I got in touch. I'm wondering if you could offer some kind of quantity discount for 10 plus units. Again, actually I want something like 16 plus units, but I was trying to leave a little room to negotiate. This guy has not answered at all. This sort of aggravates me a little bit, but we'll see about what happens going forward. Other guys getting these spacers to connect the beagle bones to the circuit board and perhaps just connect the circuit board to the entire tiles, to the back plane, the acrylic thing that's going to mount them for handling. I'm not sure. Found a pretty good price and this guy's DHL was pretty cheap, so I didn't even negotiate. Let's do it. Delivery time five to five days is a little bit scary, but you know. So I put in the order. I decided, oh yeah, better leave a little happy friendly message for happy new years on it and so forth. And this one has actually already shipped. These are, you know, I ordered a thousand of the screws, the matching screws to go with these things. There'll be at least four on a board to hold the standoffs for the beagle bone green. There might be eight on a board if they're depending on how we actually mount these things on to the back next backstop that we're going to go for it. 10 lots of 100 each. That's a thousand of a thousand of these things. They were only $30, $39 delivered, you know, which is really pretty cheap. But then it's just a tiny little nut. Actually, I went to alibaba.com, which is the place for the actual dealing with wholesalers where you're always dealing straight with the factory. And, you know, these things, the same part, the DIM, 4934 stainless steel nut of the M3 size, blah, blah, blah, like that.  They really crank these things out. So that is also in flight. That has officially shipped according to a message a couple of days ago, although the tracking number is not working yet. That's one of the little tricks that they do. Even when you pay for, you know, FedEx, IE or DHL or whatever it is, they claim to give you a number, but then the number doesn't resolve through DHL or FedEx for like days. So we'll see what happens with that. I got mail back from the 4Ucon people saying many thanks. It was very nice. And so the problem is, is the reason it's a 5K minimum order quantity is because it's a special order because it's gray. If I would take black, which had a different part number than the minimum quantity, it was a thousand, which is much closer to what I needed. Now, the problem is I couldn't find black. I didn't actually want gray. So I answered thanks for the response. It looks better for me. I've been, I can't, but I can't actually find the point that you're linking to me on the website. Of course, I had to edit it and put in little apologies and whatnot. I don't know.  I don't feel like I'm good at it, but I'm getting a little bit more practice at it. This is the whole outside the comfort zone thing. Sent it off. And in fact, I think their database was messed up and somebody actually went and fixed it. So this only took, I think this was same day that the answer came back, that they got it fixed. So that was pretty good. And so I found, I put together an order using the new number that they gave me for black of the intertile connectors, which is more what I wanted anyway. Plus the two by 23 headers. That's for the Beaglebone greens plus two by 13 headers. That's to connect the display to the board. And then the only remaining question was this lead time seven to 28 working days, 28 working days. It's like seven weeks. And well, not quite that bad six weeks and so on.  There's billions of these things lying around. They just have to kind of scoop them out and weigh them and send them to me. So I wanted to double check, you know, is everything in stock? Is it really going to take 28 days and so on? And I got the answer back. No, these items are produced by order. We do not have stock. So three to four times three to four weeks approximately starting from when I confirmed the order. So these parts are not in flight. I haven't pulled the trigger on these things. But my feeling is, is, you know, it's time to relax a little bit. I've worked pretty hard to get an awful lot of parts in and in particular to get secure the parts that look like they were going to go out of stock for, you know, 10s and 20 week periods lead times. And so if this is three to four weeks, I'm going to be doing other stuff for the next three weeks anyway. If I do this kind of thing, then, you know, I don't also miss. I don't need to pay for the super rush shipping. So as long as we can be making progress and actually getting things coming getting things moving, it would be more cost effective to not rush quite as much. It's just, you know, I've been working on this for a long time. I want to see this thing running. Hardware is just a stepping stone to get to the architecture level to get to the software level to get to the living computation, which is really the goal for me. But made a lot of progress and need to relax. All right. The funny thing was was that so she suggested that, you know, please order 21 553 instead of 16188, you know, so what the deal is that. So this was 16188. This was the other one, you know, and what the heck is the difference? I spent quite a bit of time looking through these things trying to figure out what the difference is. Basically, the difference is the tolerances got a little bit worse.  You see that everywhere. Plus or minus 0.4. That's the original one. And where is it here? There it is 2.54 plus 0.45 and so on. So as far as I can tell the new version that I'm being encouraged to order, which I suspect is the only thing they've got everything in terms of the electrical properties all exactly the same. They just give themselves a little bit more mechanical slop. Okay, I'm all right with that. And all right. So that's where we were again. And so bottom line. Here's what the parts look like right now. Everything in green in in row H here in green is whether we have enough stock for the part to build 150 of them. In row in column I here is whether we have enough stock to build 200 of them. And essentially, we've got enough stock to build 200 of everything, except we need more Beaglebones greens and displays if we want to do 200. But we could do that after we get the order because the ETS guys assembling the board are not going to be plugging the Beaglebones into it directly. We're going to be doing that. So the real thing again, it's the through hole parts J1 to six. Those are the intertile connectors going around the outside P8 and P9 and so forth. Very little of this was green 10 weeks ago. This is progress. All right. So let's talk about 3D printing talk about 3D printing a bunch last week.  This is what things were looking like before. Last time we had the two legs, the two buttons in the middle plus the case around it. And we had had that one failure. Whoops. Always the one failure where one of the buttons came loose from the bed and ended up, you know, I don't know flopping around. I really don't know how it managed to get this kind of hairdo. So again, last week designed a brim, an extra little thing to give more surface area on the build plate to help it stick down. And that worked pretty good. But then you had to kind of nip off the little ring off of each thing, which wasn't hard to do, but it was an extra step. And I ended up having all of these little nipped off rings lying around my 3D printer. And Andrew Walpole suggested that you could do a raft or you could do these other things and so forth, which led me to think about, you know, well, you know, if really the only goal is to have a bigger footprint on the build plate to let it stick down better, then why have something that has to be removed at all? Couldn't we make this thing just be a little bit bigger? The radius of it can't get much bigger because the buttonhole is near the edge of the case. If the diameter of the little pusher foot got much bigger, it would hit the case. But it could be asymmetric. So I, so right, here's a picture of it printing out with the brim. So I designed these things that I called duck legs that are still the same diameter on one side, but they extend a bit away to get more land, more area on the build plate. And this solves an additional problem for me, which is now that they're asymmetric, the position of it's easy to tell where the little bump is that's going to go into the push button shaft hole, which used to be a small pain point because it was black, you know, plastic going in a black hole and so on. And the thing that you were holding on to was that pusher at the bottom and it was completely symmetric. So you'd be spinning it around trying to figure out which one angle to get it to go in so that they would make properly. And now making it asymmetric because it didn't need to be symmetric.  So that's nice like that. And let's see. So here's another angle, a couple of pairs of duck legs. And here they are mounted on the board. So they're right angles to the locking shaft and the locking shafts are both pointing in the same direction. One of them points along the side of the case. The other one points into the case. That ends up working out right given the other material. So here is the one. So it's a little hard to see. There's the duck foot there that's pointing along the case. It could not actually point into the case because it would smash into this giant capacitor, which I built in there, which is probably way bigger than it needs to be and so on. Here's the other one that is pointing into the case because there's plenty of room there and so on. Now I was a little bit worried that in particular that this guy, you know, his duck foot is running right along the edge of the case. And I was afraid that when you were assembling it and the button could drop down a little lower, it might get rotated and latch under the corner of the case and make it inconvenient to set it down. And so eventually I said, well, okay, but I could narrow it down so that even if it rotates a little bit, it won't go out far enough to catch on the edge of the case. So now these aren't duck feet. These are more like, you know, Pinocchio legs or something like that. Some kind of industrial accident like that. But these actually are working pretty good. I printed up a few of these. They assemble easily and so forth. So that's pretty good. Now, last week also we were working on the holes for the glow rods that the light emitting dials go at the bottom for the power supply showing the red for the grid power supply and green for this individual tiles power supply. And I was having trouble getting the hole to be uniform enough so that it wouldn't be either too tight or too loose. Now Andrew Walpole pointed me at a... What's going on? Oh, wrong button. Pointed me at a video by Makers Muse. There's a great YouTube channel that does lots of... does 3D printing stuff, you know. Better 3D printed holes CAD for newbies. Like that.  So I tried to do one of those and I made a little blank to try it on and it seemed possible although it was really super tight so I had to start scaling it up. Here's where I was testing a range of percentages over the 1 eighth of an inch to get it to work and eventually it turned out to be plus seven. The 7% solution to make the hole 7% bigger than the thing just because of the nature of how it works and these are all 7% holes. They're just oriented differently with respect to the first layer printing and so on. And these are working pretty well. There's what it looks like in the first layer getting put down. Here it is, has built up a little ways and so forth. Now, you know, sometimes it crud gets in the middle and it gets into trouble but mostly it's really not bad. So here's an example where some crud got into the middle. I ended up reaming it out with a Torx bit and then it actually worked okay. But you know, it's always something. And here's an example of it in use. It's sort of the happy Cyclops Glowrod Holder. Not bad. Got to hurry up almost out of time but started having some first layer failures which is if you've done any 3D printing, you know my pain. You know, it's probably, I didn't clean the build plate well enough although I've gotten pretty religious about that. So you know, I had to, it was a disaster. But so Google about it and you read about these things and one of the things to do is to raise the temperature of the extruder so that the plastic is a little more liquidy. Raise the temperature of the bed so it's all a little sticky just for the first layer. I raised it up 5 degrees to 220 degrees centigrade and 65 degrees for the bed and that's working pretty well. So far I haven't had a failure. This is it's laying down in the new one. At least I haven't had a failure on the first layer. Just one thing after another. I'm sorry, I'm sure this gets boring but this is actually what happens. Finally was getting to the end of the first rule, rule, the first spool of Prusament. Now this i3 Mark III printer, one of its big features is it has a filament sensor so it can tell when it's out and stop. So alright, so we're going to see it happening. It popped loose from the thing when it came in. It gradually slurped it up and then it detected that and then went into filament changing mode. Press the knob to unload the filament. I did okay, please pull out the filament immediately. There is no filament to pull out. It's gone in already.  When you change filament normally you get a whole little pile of squeeze out stuff. That is not enough. Long and short of it is my extruder is completely clogged at this point. I can't print anything at the moment. Try these things, whatever. I will spare you the details. We'll find out. I'm dreading trying to get this thing cleared and this is all because I didn't buy it from a kit. I didn't learn all the guts. I tried to get it assembled. Alright, so that's that. Now, bottom line. The next goal is the Artificial Life Conference. The abstracts, the papers are due Friday, March 8th. It's about three weeks from today. That's going to be the focus of attention. I'm going to have the parts discussions and the ordering and the stuff in flight hopefully happening in the background but I'm not going to be working on the hardware. Not going to be working on the software except in so far as it serves the needs of the paper and that's what it's going to be. In the words of my friend, Melanie Mitchell who has this on the door, the fundamental question is why aren't you writing? And I can use your help. In the next several weeks, the next three weeks, if you see me on the internet, on social media, please say hi Dave, why aren't you writing? I'll be back somehow to have a brief update next week. Thanks for being here. Thanks for watching.


I often say that I live climate change. My friends live it. My family lives it too. This is something which we are living in.  These are things which we are experiencing in our day-to-day lives and something must be done about this. Around our area, the people are dependent on agriculture. Right now they've even transitioned to small grain crops. Because sometimes the rain doesn't come under quick cloud. Sometimes they've put heavy downpours. The land is no longer balanced as it was before. In 50 years time can imagine the climate itself. The heatwaves which we usually have. Now this is the biggest message I have for the world leaders, the business leaders out there. One thing that you don't understand is the time. Time is ticking and there's no better time for acting than now. The best solution is to englobe young people. We are here. We are smart. We have the solutions. And most importantly, nothing for us without us is indeed for us.


Today is the 21st day of lockdown triggered by one of the deadliest pandemic of the centuries. Why I say deadliest is in the relative terminology. In the modern times when the man has progressed so much so that it has been five decades since he landed on the moon, any disease or infection which affects millions of people and kills thousands of them in today's time proves and shames the human race. We will never be able to win over nature. There is never a good idea to pick up quarrel, fight with nature to destroy, devastate the environment and worse being slaughtering animals and birds to meet our hunger and craving for blood and flesh. Well whatever it was or is, the supernatural forces made the human race captive in the self-made cages. But have we utilized this time well? Let me share what I did. Firstly I got down to introspect and tried my best to unlock some locks or should I say I tried to unknot the knots in my mind. I wanted two clear answers to my two questions. What was happening in the world was random or is there some deep message from the God Almighty or nature, whatever you may call. Second, I wanted to understand that is there anything sustainable when it comes to human life and career path after deep introspection? Answer to the first question was that no, whatever happened was not random. It is very well scripted by the nature, whatever goes around comes around. You reap what you saw, you get what you gave or you give. Hence I need to follow a lifestyle of complete ethics and morality, love and humility. Respect the nature more than before. This will at least bring me at peace with myself and that is what matters at the end because there is a whole universe inside each of us and we all need to bring the turmoil inside us to stillness. Hope I am not sounding like a monk. Well, I would not mind being referred to as the monk who sold his Ferrari. Though I do not have a Ferrari, I do have a BMW. Well, jokes aside, let me get on with the answer to the second question about sustainability. Nothing is sustainable when it comes to life and material possessions, materialism, be it your career.  So please invest in realism, in nature, in your spiritual enhancement and become a good if not a perfect human being.  Everyday spend some quality time to connect with the universe inside you to bring it in sync with the divine wisdom which is oneness, oneness between us and nature. Yes, that's my message, that's all for today from my personal wisdom chat.


If the Holy Spirit is holy, if the Holy Spirit is powerful, if the Holy Spirit is God, well then how come he doesn't always do what he's supposed to do? The Bible is clear that the Holy Spirit is God, and he works in us, he lives in us, he moves in us, and the Bible even tells us what he is going to do in us. Now obviously he is the one that regenerates our heart. He is the one that gives us a new heart so that we can function in God. And there are some things that the Bible tells us that the Holy Spirit will do in us. As a matter of fact, if we don't do or move with the way the Holy Spirit wants us to, the Bible says that we are literally quenching the Holy Spirit. So, what is it that the Bible says that we are supposed to do? What happens if we have the Holy Spirit in us? Well, the Bible says in Galatians 5-22, we all know this passage, the fruit of the Spirit, which is the result. The word, the Greek word here is karpos, which is the result, what happens as a result of having the Spirit, is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control, big one. We'll talk about that in a little bit. Again, such things, there is no law. Now, that's what the Holy Spirit will do in us. That's what we'll look like when the Holy Spirit is in us. But unfortunately, if you listen to some people who will tell us that certain things are the Holy Spirit, such as being slain in the Holy Spirit, falling out, speaking in a language that they have no idea what they're saying, doesn't that kind of go against what we're seeing here? Remember, if self-control is a result of having the Holy Spirit, well then how can the Holy Spirit then turn around and cause us to lose control and to not know what's going on? Something else people say who have this inordinary amount of Holy Spirit in them, this supernatural use of the Holy Spirit where the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they have these manifestations. They will tell you that you can be possessed or be oppressed or be demonized, whatever the term is, by a demonic force. But how could that be? Since the Holy Spirit lives in us, the Bible says greater is he that's in us than he that's in the world, well then how could that be? How could it be that some demonic force can come in and bind the strong man and then plunder his house? Is that possible? Well the only way that some of these things are possible is if we have a weak or a lazy Holy Spirit. My question's always been to those that make these statements is what is the Holy Spirit in you doing? What is the Holy Spirit doing in you where you can lose control? What is the Holy Spirit doing in you that unless you have some sort of outward manifestation that benefits only you that you don't grow, you're not edified? What is the Holy Spirit doing in you to where when you read, when you pray, when you fellowship that you don't grow in the Lord? What sort of Holy Spirit does that person have? Do they have the Holy Spirit? That's going to be the real question. Remember we were told in Ezekiel 36 that when he puts the Holy Spirit in us, when the Holy Spirit is in our heart, he says that he will cause us, and this word cause is to make to do. So it's him that's working, that's moving, that's causing us, not making it possible, but actually causing us. There's no way to get around this word. He will cause us to walk in his statues and to be careful to observe his ordinances. So if that's what he's going to cause us to do those things, if we're not doing those things, and I don't mean that sometimes we won't fight against or move against, I'm not saying that, but by and large we are going to follow the Lord because the Holy Spirit is in us. And if a person is not following the Lord, then the question needs to be asked, does that person have the Holy Spirit? The Holy Spirit, the very same one that we have been, if we are safe, have been sealed by until the day of redemption, until we receive our ultimate reward. The question is, if a person has the Holy Spirit and they end up losing their salvation, as some would say, what was the Holy Spirit doing in them all along? How is it that the Holy Spirit would even allow such a thing? Remember, he is God, he is powerful, he is mighty. The Bible even tells us that it is him who is able, now unto him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to make you stand in the presence of his glory, blameless with great joy.  Are you telling me that he can do it, but he won't? The question needs to be asked, what in the world is the Holy Spirit doing when we are falling, when we are losing our salvation, when we're walking away? What is the Holy Spirit doing? Well, the only conclusion that we can come up with is that the Holy Spirit in that person is either too weak to fight, too weak to stop what's happening, not powerful enough, maybe lazy, I don't know. The Holy Spirit that we are seeing described in many Christians today is not the Holy Spirit that is described in the Bible. So the conclusion can only be either one, you don't have a Bible or the Spirit that's working in you is too weak, which means it's not the Holy Spirit. As we're told by many people that we will, and they say correctly, that we shall receive power. Now, obviously this is spoken of for the disciples, the apostles in Acts 1-8, they'll receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they shall be his witnesses. And the same for us. If we have the Holy Spirit, we are going to be his witnesses. We are going to testify of him, but also we are going to testify to ourselves. We will be reminded all the time who we belong to. Our body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, which means he's moving in us, which means he can be grieved if we don't do what we're supposed to do, but because of what God said he's going to do, he is going to cause us to walk in him perfectly. No, that will only happen once we receive our glorified bodies, once we receive our eternal reward, once we're going to be in our eternal state. That will happen, then there will be no more sin. But now, until the time that we get there, Paul makes a statement that he is confident that he who began a good work in us is going to complete it. How is he going to do so? Well, the Holy Spirit who is the one according to John, according to Jesus, the Holy Spirit comes in us. We are born of the Spirit. We don't know who is, how, when, where, as the Bible says in John 3, but we do know that all of us are born of the Holy Spirit, are born as a result of his will. And so he who began a good work in us, he is faithful. He is without question going to complete what he started. And so if he doesn't complete what he started, well, then the only thing that it could possibly be is that he didn't start it. He is not like us where he gives up. He is powerful. He is not lazy. He is not weak. And so if that's what's happening in a person's life, that person may very well not have that. If a person is being demonized, oppressed, possessed, and calls himself a Christian, one of two things. He either is not a Christian or he's not being attacked. If this person has lost their salvation, one of two things. Either they never lost their salvation or they were never Christian because the Holy Spirit does not work that way. For getting what others say or think or ascribe to the Holy Spirit, the Bible literally tells us what the Holy Spirit does. And if what's happening in your life, if the Holy Spirit is causing things to happen that aren't found in the Bible and aren't described, that's not the Holy Spirit. The Bible literally tells us what the Holy Spirit is going to do. He's powerful. He's error-moving. He's active. And so because of that, we can trust that he will do exactly what he says he's going to do. Why? Because he's God. And what's the one thing that he left us to remind us that is the Holy Spirit? His Word. Because all Scripture are breathed out by the Spirit of God in men so that we can have these things that we can be thoroughly equipped and lacking nothing. So don't let someone convince you that the Spirit that's in you isn't the Spirit at all. If it is the Spirit in you, then he is going to do exactly what his Word says he's going to do. Amen.


Hi everyone, my name is Zana from Product School and in this video we're talking about user personas and why they're important and how to create your own using the Product School template. Now, user personas are essential because they help you stay laser focused while building and marketing your product. You can use them to map out key behaviors, roles, responsibilities that this persona or that your targeted audience has. In the second slide you will find extra resources that you can use while building your user persona. And in the slide you can house all your personas in one place so that you can jump between them. In the first slide you'll need to add an image, give your persona a name, a job and three facts about themselves. In the slide you have user interview questions that you can use to help you understand your user better. And in the following slide you'll have more questions to help you tap into their behaviors, into their roles, into their everyday struggles and strengths. In this slide you'll fill out their demographic information such as age, gender, income, educational level and location, emotional drivers such as professional goals, motivators and challenges. And lastly three blockers or pain points per persona. In this template you also have a sample that you can tap into that's already filled out to help you understand better how to fill out the template and guide you throughout the process. If you have any questions there are more resources that you can tap into on the product school website and YouTube channel as well as you can go into the product school community and ask your questions there. Hope you found this helpful and thank you for listening.


Everything weird, I'm sure change Gonna take some years, but I hope it all switch Before my son hit the street Trying to shift gears Rolling with his peers Smoking, you know how it is I'm just keeping the trail, yeah Cause if he anything like Pops Full grown of his own Just like it's Pops did Before the world closed When my son is full grown May he roll on gold and crown Just like it's Pops Chevy's on switches, baby we smoking weed in it Eat the E in it Chevy's on switches, baby we smoking weed in it Chevy's on switches, baby we smoking weed in it On shelf, highway different East side, on mine at all times Yeah, like


So anyway, we got together and thought about a common problem we faced all the time. So one of the heavily used apps, by heavily tried to be used by the three of us, which is Expense Manager. So we tried in Expense Manager a lot, but how we played isn't... Okay, there are amazing Expense Manager out there, but we failed to use them just because we got to make that Expense entry all the time. So the only way we can really solve it is by not making an entry at all. So this application Expense bot is pushed towards not maintaining expenses by not making an entry at all. So we all have a very, very, very good thing. And every time we make a payment, we draw a real message, a notification. So we use that message and pass the amount from the message to have a database of the expenses. So the app may not be as awesome as it should be, but how we have efficient it is very good. And anyway, we'll show you what we have. He's done the design, he's done the... Okay, so I've looked at passing of the SMS and to connect it to the actual connection data and create a notification in Android device. So basically what we are implementing and we have basically created a POC kind of thing, proof of concept, so you'll get a summary and a list of transitions and you can create a transition manually as well as edit a transition. Okay, very awesome. So and when you get the SMS, so recently we were testing it and we got SMS, we passed it, the application passes it automatically and it creates a notification if it asks you whether you want to add it to your transition list or whether you want to cancel it. So we are also planning to extend it to the variable devices so that you don't have to remove your mobile phone pocket, you'll get a notification on your smartphone or anything and from there you can just add it later in the night after dinner when you are free you can just go through your transition. Because I understand the concept of just feeling the notification on your transactions or is it something which can be used in a total way. How is this possible? This is very common. What do you get for every purchase, notification? So generally I explain my personal things. When I mostly do a list of rules that require my mobile phone, so on each transaction I get a notice from my registry manager to escape. So that is the only part of it. Thank you for the opportunity. I would like to take this mechanism because if you do not receive the services for each and every transaction, at times they just escape. That's my knowledge also. So it is just an effort to reduce that manager to use. So at the end of the day, I don't remember all the transactions I have done in morning, afternoon, shopping, everything. So if on the one hand I just need to probably take care of it, that's the only thing I need to do. There is a button to the page. How do we even add this? Probably have a smartwatch, mic or something, everything. That's not important. Thank you.


So, welcome friends to this presentation on cultivation theory, one of the most important theories in media and communication from the 20th century and we will have a discussion on George Goebbner's conceptualization and his ideas of the cultivation analysis project and the cultivation theory. So, we are going to basically talk about how cultivation is important, why we have to deal with television effect as a very separate effect from other media and about what are the different aspects of cultivation theory and how it can be represented as mainstreaming and resonance effects. So, basically cultivation theory is different from or is an answer to one kind of media effect theories that was prevalent in the first part of the 20th century when people started talking about media impact or media effects in a systematic manner. So, basically this earlier the researchers were more interested about how specific messages could produce changes in attitudes or behaviors. Later on it was found out that no there was not major changes in attitudes or behaviors there were other kinds of changes but this was one very important development where people started seeing media effect beyond changes in attitudes and behaviors and also there was one another stream of thought which thought that media effect was not very powerful or media was not very powerful it was a very limited kind of an effect because they were looking for those kind of behavioral changes in human beings which obviously wasn't there. So, like the uses and gratification theory which we discussed the other day cultivation analysis was also the response to that limited effects theory that the media effects were in a different direction or they were of a different kind. So, basically this cultivation theory was about how people hold specific conceptions of reality. So, how do they perceive the world or how they perceive the world view and it was found out later on and I will emphasize on that as we go along that their version of reality or what they thought was real was very similar to what television portrayed as reality. So, it was basically about how people constructed their images or their ideas of reality and we will find out in greater details about why their idea of reality was closer to the television idea of reality because television as we know is a combination of news and fiction programs. So, how these news and fiction programs together led people to have a very different view of reality than it actually was or we will talk about the mean world syndrome as well. So, the central idea, the central theme of cultivation studies is that the idea of social reality is closer to the television reality or the idea of reality for heavy viewers of television is closer to the reality which television is portraying. So, the obvious question is why should this be limited to television? There are three reasons and these reasons are generally provided by George Govner himself and this was a project that he and his colleagues started in the Allenburg School of Communication in the late 1960s, we will come back to this. So, these are the three reasons, the first that the overall amount of exposure to television is much more than all the other media and you might agree with some of it although these days we spend a lot of time on the small mobile screen as well but generally the amount of even on small screen a lot of the media that we consume or video content we consume is what could be very similar to the television content as well. So, the first is the amount of exposure to television. The second is that this exposure to television begins even before we start using any other media. So, a small child for example would be watching a lot more television with all those kids program and all rather than consuming any other media. So, that exposure begins before we use other media. Television is much more accessible so it occupies a central place in every house and people consume it a lot more ritualistically that is that point of the time when we will all be in front of the television and also television does not require literacy like print media does. So, television is also different in terms of its centralized mass production and ritualistic use of that coherent set of images or stereotypes that they produce to appeal to virtually the entire population. So, these television images these are all all government's terms they virtually appeal to the entire population. Another term that George government uses is that of representational realism. So, this is one kind of storytelling in which the viewer is convinced that if certain assumptions are true then the events that are taking place there could actually happen in my own life it could happen in reality as well. So, television is different from other media because of the first three reasons I said and then the institutional processes is also the form of content which is representational realism. So, government's theory was based on the observation that much of the socialization takes the form of what is storytelling and we just seen that this storytelling is a representation realism because it convinces us that given certain conditions this is what actually happens in our everyday life or this is something closer to us or this is closer to reality. So, cultivation theory was developed by George government and his colleagues as I said in the late 60s in the Annenberg School of Communication. So, by un-over-emphasizing certain aspects of social reality so in the original version of the cultivation theory George governor and his team they were more interested about the violence on television and as you would remember that much of what passes off as you know the cartoon short kids program there is lots and lots of violence there as well. So, it could be you know even the smaller Mickey and you know the Tom and Jerry shows or those kind of things that you know they are just breaking walls or they are lying flat or somebody is just you know thrown up into the universe even kids programs has a lot of violence. So, this is what their contention was that the violent crime is over-emphasized in television programs and they under represent other aspects of life so that is how television drama affects people's perceptions of reality and as you will understand what one of the weaknesses is that it is not always violent there are so many other aspects also but later on it was adopted or it was adapted to include other aspects apart from violent crime on television. So, these are governor's words so he suggests that television violence or the television view demonstrates or communicates a lot about social norms and relationships also about the goals and means that these should be my goals or these are the means by which I should reach these goals and these are also about the winners and losers so these are the type of people or if you do this you will be a winner or if you don't do this you will be a loser and if you transgress from these social norms you have to pay this kind of a price. So television normalizes or provides us that these are the norms or these are the social norms that we should live by and the television violence is a dramatic demonstration of these social norms so it tells us that how people have to pay for violence or who gets away with violence or when do they get away with violence and why do they get away with violence and how and against whom so this is in government's own words in this 1976 article which I should write at the beginning so that is why the portrayal of television violence has such a greater impact so cultivation is not a direct effect as I said right at the beginning it's not something that you consume content and you change but it's a dynamic ongoing process of interaction among messages and contexts so there are these messages and I have my own context and I draw my own meaning or I frame it according to my own situation so different groups their life situations their world views are different so different people cultivate these effects different differently so it's not a direct behavioral impact as I said or not even a unidirectional effect but it's something which is dynamic and an interactive process so they have a message we have a context and we combine these two and we have our own understanding of the world or it's more of a you know kind of a cognitive impact or a cognitive effect that how does my view of reality change by consuming television content so important that this is a very very different from this is very different from the direct unidirectional effect that the magic bullet theory for example or the mass society theory for example would talk about so it's not linear it's not a unidirectional but it's a dynamic and it is interactive and it also builds on the assumption that this same image you know comes over and over again so that is a cumulative impact so you have some impact you have some understanding today and you see the same image or similar images later on and that's how this cultivation grows so that's why this metaphor of cultivation so this is this materializes by the same images being repeated again and again so that is how you cultivate this effect or that is how you cultivate a world view so cultivation metaphor is used because it's one way to talk about influencing because without talking about effects because if I'm talking about effect then it is like you know somebody dominating the other here we are talking about a social construction kind of a thing we construct the meaning based on our understanding of society and based on the messages that are provided to us so it predicts the long-term formation and shaping of perceptions so it's it says that you know our long-term idea of society about people about situations will will will be shaped by the consumption of these media messages so as you can understand this is a direct response to people who suggested that media has very limited impact because we are saying no media does have very strong impact because when you are suggesting media had limited impact you are assuming that media would cause immediate behavioral change you know cultivation is one one way of suggesting that media can have long-term cognitive changes so these are not short-term behavioral changes but long-term cognitive changes so this again is a very important indicator about media impact but in a very different dimension in a very different paradigm so this was as I said at the beginning a result of the cultural indicators project that these researchers they started at the Annenberg School of Communication in Pennsylvania USA and these were the three questions that these culture this cultural indicators project asked or these were the three questions that they were trying to find out that first the first and the most important that what are the you know constraints or what what what what are the pressures on the media producers people who produce content or the institutions which produce content what are the constraints that you know overgird them or what are the constraints that influences the production of media content not just constraints the processes so how how does how does you know for example our everyday routine of journalism how does it lead to creation of that kind of a media content so these are basically about institutional processes the second thing that the cultural indicators project wanted to answer was that what are the dominant images or what are the dominant messages or what are the dominant values and lessons that are expressed in the media content and the third one which is very close to or which is about cultivation analysis is about what is the relation between the attention to these messages and people's conceptions of social reality so to put it differently the cultural indicators project the first part of it was about institutional process analysis so what are the power structures and the social societal pressures that govern the production of media messages the second was about content analysis and trying to find out that what are the images that are over represented or which type of people are shown to be victims or which type of people are shown to be perpetrators or which type of people are shown to be comical and so on and so forth so this is about the message system analysis and the third and the most important was the cultivation analysis and in this what governor and his colleagues did was that they divided the viewers into three different categories into heavy medium and light viewers and their answers on a number of questions were compared so the questions that they were given the answers were either a television answer means a reality which is closer to the television reality and the other which was closer to the real world as you can understand that this is about three different kinds of people heavy viewers of television medium viewers of television and light viewers of television and they were given questions and they were asked to answer those questions and the answers were either about a television view of reality and the real view or something that was closer to the real view of the world so this was seen that heavy viewers their answer was much closer to the television view and for lighter viewers their answers were much closer to the actual reality so that is what they called the cultivation differential that people who were heavy viewers of television their notions of reality was closer to the television reality and that is the crux of the cultivation analysis or the cultivation theory as such and this leads to what is known as the mean world syndrome which is a direct result of the cultivation theory so heavy viewers of television are more likely to see the world as a scary place as a mean place as a violent place and as a dangerous place so in short they see the world as a mean world kind of a thing so more people viewed the more likely they were to exaggerate the incidence of crime in the real world so if you're watching all those crime programs are on the crime shows of all different kinds then your trust in people will be there will be a lot of you know comedy shows also about you know how people start doubting everybody once they watch too much of those crime patrol and those kind of things so this is very real when people consume a lot of violent content then their idea of the world itself is that okay everybody is so the world itself is a very violent place which might not be true so this is one way of it now Gurbana provides two different explanations for the cultivation effect and these explanations fall into two categories one is about mainstreaming and the other is resonance so what mainstreaming does is that it first of all this is about three B's as you can see the first is that it blurs the traditional distinction between people's views of their words so the distinction between reality and television reality that this is blurred so that is because of this mainstreaming effect it blends their realities into the cultural mainstream so whatever is there in the cultural mainstream that is blended into the television world as well and the third is that television bends that mainstream so the mainstream itself starts believing the television reality so the first is about mainstreaming so using these three metaphors of blurring of blending and bending the cultivation effect happens so those who are heavy viewers they go through this process of blurring through the process of blending and through the process of bending so constant exposure to the same images they develop perspectives which are very different from say for example if they were to be listened to radio all the time so it doesn't happen with radios if it doesn't happen that you know if you listen to a lot of FM music all the time you keep on singing the entire day of course you might be humming that song for some time there are we call them as sound worms there are certain things that we keep on hearing but otherwise the idea of the world doesn't change by you know listening to radio a lot or to you know reading to newspaper content it is traditionally more or the impact is seen more with television and that's because of this mainstreaming effect the second effect is the resonance effect and what is the resonance effect when people see that the things on television are similar to their everyday realities so in a sense whatever is is happening in my real life I see a representation on television so actually since the television world looks like my world so it must be true so this is what happens and this this because it resonates with their actual lives that is why they consider it to be a true representative of all other things so say for example I find the resonance in news for example and then even if I consume fiction then I would assume that okay this is how reality is because a lot of our understanding of society is true television and since we regard this as a very actual representation of reality and one of us as I said is through this resonance effect that is why this impact is so much stronger this is one of the researchers that did and they saw that with heavy viewers it becomes very closer the idea of reality is much closer I'm not getting into the details of all that the last thing that I want to discuss here is about the two different cultivation effects so the first order cultivation effect tells us about facts about say for example that okay say for example it tells us that there is a lot of violence or it tells us that there is a lot of political corruption or tells us that there is lot of crony capitalism or there is a it tells us about you know what can be regarded as facts or about knowledge so these are the probability judgments about the world so in the first order cultivation I get to know that these are the facts okay so political people in high places they might not be trustworthy so this is one of the first order cultivation effect that governor suggests the second order cultivation effect tells us about the values and assumptions that we must have so the first order cultivation effect was about reality the second was about what to do about that so it could lead to say for example okay so we shouldn't trust certain kinds of politicians because they're not trustworthy in the first order cultivation effect they told us they're not trustworthy in the second order they tell us that we must treat them with with disdain for example so it tells us about values and assumptions that that we should regard as useful in first order it tells us only about the fact in the second order cultivation it tells us about these values and assumptions so what are the strengths of the cultivation theory the first strength is that it combines the macro and micro level theories so it talks about the institutional effects and it also talks about the micro level at our level how do we negotiate with that or how do we construct meaning using the the messages that are provided by these institutional factors so this is a major strength that it is not only about micro level it is combining both these macro and micro levels the second is it provides a very detailed explanation of television's very very unique role and as we've just seen the role of television is very different because of certain factors and also because there is a cumulative impact because of these repeated you know broadcast of the similar images so it provides us with a very detailed explanation of television's unique role it also gives us an empirical study of these widely held humanistic assumptions that if you watch something you know and then your your version of truth will be very much closer to that so this is like a humanistic assumption this is true I mean how can anyone doubt that but this provided us this cultural indicators project this provided us with with a view or with a with an empirical structure through which to kind of study these humanistic assumptions it redefines and I've emphasized this earlier as well it redefines effect as more than observable behavioral changes so it's not just observable behavioral change it might be about cognitive changes as well it applies to wide variety of effects issues so it's it can be applied not just to the violent violence on television but it can be applied to wide variety of effects issues it can be about health it can be about education it can be about many other things and it also provides basis for social change and that's because if we understand that this is how the medium works then we might work for for for betterment of society by exposing people to these kind of images again and again so that their version of reality is is closer to what it should be oh there are quite a few assumptions quite a few weaknesses of the theory as well and one of it is that the initially there are a lot of methodological limitations and as I said you know this was something which was not falsifiable so something which is unfalsifiable is not regarded as very scientific the second is that it assumes that television content is very homogeneous so it might not be homogeneous see for example that that wonderful serial called the big bang theory there's hardly any violence there so there there's nothing to suggest that you know it's a similar kind of contents there are a lot of there's a lot about niche contents also which which people consume differently the third weakness is that it focuses more on the heavy users of users of television so there are very many different kind of users so and for them it might not be that much applicable so it's only applicable to heavy users of television as they describe and it is very difficult to apply to media which is used less heavily than television there's a lot of media which is I mean not used as much as television as we said as far as television is concerned there is almost a ritualistic consumption of content it's probably more ritualistic that even religion for example this is something that we do on a very regular basis so if we talk of other media which we do not consume as heavily as as television and if we intend to apply to that then probably this might not be true so thank you so much that's all about cultivation theory