The simplest kinds of circuits where electric current flows in a single closed loop are not terribly common in the world around us. Nonetheless, they form the archetype of all complex circuits. Let's take a look at simple circuits and build them into more complex circuits and see how the tools of energy and charge conservation will come together to give us the ability to analyze even complicated circuitry. We're going to go back now to thinking about ideal situations or mostly ideal situations involving very simple circuits and then we'll move on to the more complex circuit examples and I'll motivate why it's important to learn this material in the context of something I've mentioned before which is electrical transmission down the length of a neuron. So let's consider the following circuit. This is not terribly different from what we did in class with two light bulbs in series. What we have over here is we have an ideal EMF device and we have a resistor and you'll notice that those are enclosed in a green box. I'll come back to those in a moment and over here of course we have another resistor whose resistance is labeled as four ohms and this little R resistor that's grouped with the ideal battery has a resistance of two ohms. What's being depicted here is something that's much more akin to a real battery situation. This is how one would represent a more realistic battery situation in a simple circuit. The source of the electric potential is ideal but the battery itself does contain an internal resistance. Batteries are not perfect conductors of electric charge and so there is always going to be some resistance when moving charge between the terminals that is the minus end and the plus end of the battery. A way to represent that schematically using the bits and pieces of circuit symbols that we've built up so far is to put an ideal battery here represented with the EMF symbol of this calligraphy E next to a small resistor. The typical internal resistance of a battery that you might get off the shelf like a nine volt battery or a 12 volt battery or something like that is about an ohm, two ohms, something like that. Not a whole lot but it is not zero and so the green box is meant to indicate the boundary in the diagram of the real battery. So a real battery consists schematically of an ideal source of electromotive force in EMF device and a resistance and that resistance may be very small but it is not zero. The positive terminal is again labeled with the plus, the negative terminal is again labeled with the minus and just as always in a simple circuit like this you can very quickly figure out what the direction of current flow will be. Current flows in the direction positive charge is moving and positive charge is emitted from the positive side of the battery. And so the arrows that are drawn here are correct for this situation. We would expect the current I to flow clockwise through the system. Now the circuit consists of an additional resistor R equals four ohms which is much larger than the internal resistance. One could then do things like for instance solve the current that's going through the battery. Now how would one do that? Well you want to use the principle of Ohm's law that for every resistor in the circuit there is a relationship between the current moving through the resistor and the voltage across the resistor that's given by this representation of the consequences of Ohm's law that R is not dependent on V or I and so it's just a constant that relates the two. One can use the rules of adding resistors in series. We have here that the total resistance in this circuit will be equal to the battery resistance plus the external resistance of four Ohms. And so you can see very quickly that this is equal to six Ohms. And so with that in mind then one could go and divide the voltage 12 volts by the resistance six Ohms. So let's go ahead and do that. And we see that we expect to be flowing through this circuit a current of two amps. With V in volts and R in Ohms we automatically get amps out the other side when we take the ratio of V and R. Alright well there's nothing exciting about this particular diagram but it does help us to now begin to think about the following question. What happens if one short circuits a battery? Short circuiting means that you for instance take a 9 volt battery it's got those two little plugs on the top of it that you could connect into a device like a smoke alarm or a carbon monoxide monitor or something like that. Imagine that you take a paper clip and you drop the paper clip on the terminals. This creates something known as a short circuit. The paper clip is made of a highly conductive metal that offers very little resistance to the flow of current and this results in a situation known as short circuit. You're essentially letting current flow from plus to minus on the battery with almost no external resistance at all. That's the situation depicted here. We have now removed the 4 ohm resistor from the picture. We only have the internal resistance of the battery present and that means that this system will now drive current through the loop from the positive terminal to the negative terminal. What you can do then of course is assess this using Ohm's law. You can solve for the current moving through the circuit it's very simple now it's simply the voltage of the battery divided by the internal resistance present in the real battery that's 9 volts divided by 2 ohms and this gives you a current of 4.5 amps. That is a lot of current that would suddenly be coursing through a 9 volt battery and most importantly through the circuit that connects the plus terminal of the battery to the minus terminal of the battery. How much power is being dumped through the battery's resistance? So if you imagine again that the battery is a device that looks something like this with two terminals, a plus terminal and a minus terminal and you suddenly a short circuit them like this, the resistance is somewhere in here. That's where the internal resistance is located. That's going to begin to dissipate power and that is going to cause heat to build up in the battery which will then be transmitted. So this will begin to emanate heat radiating out through the battery and eventually into whatever environment contains the battery. That could be a sensitive piece of electronics. That could be your pocket. If you put a 9 volt battery in your pocket and you have coins in your pocket, you could accidentally short the battery. Well, how much power is being dumped through the resistance of the battery? A lot. 40.5 watts. Again, you just take P equals IV, take 4.5 amps multiplied by 9 volts and you get 40.5 watts. This is a lot of power. That's as much energy as is emitted by a 40 watt light bulb, right? Imagine grabbing a 40 watt light bulb, plugging it in and shoving it in your pocket. That's going to get very hot, very fast. This is extremely bad news for your skin. If the heat is transmitted very quickly to your skin, it can also cause the battery to explode. It can mechanically and chemically fail building up pressure inside the battery which then lets go in an explosion and that can do serious physical damage to your skin, your clothes and other things. Especially if there are dangerous chemicals inside the battery, they'll not be splattered everywhere. So this is why it's extremely important never to short a battery. You should always put a significant resistive load on the battery, never operate it outside of the conditions under which the manufacturer has specified for it. That's why it's bad. Now, let's think about another situation that's very common in the world around us, especially now in the era of cheaper, more affordable and more abundant rechargeable batteries. A battery charger is a very simple device. You usually have a cord going into the wall outlet that then runs into some circuitry inside the battery charger and then at the end of the battery charger, there's a pair of metal plates. You stick your AAAA batteries between the plates, wait a few hours, come back and the charger will have them fully charged for you if they're rechargeable. How does recharging work? Well, basically what you're doing is you're taking one source of electric potential difference that is much larger than another source of electric potential difference. So a typical AAAA or AAA battery, for instance, has a voltage of about 1.5 volts. Rechargeables have a little bit less, something closer to 1.2 or 1.3 volts across their terminals, but eventually 1.5. The voltage into which they're connected, however, will be much larger than the voltage that they can deliver. The circuit for the charger will represent some kind of resistance between the source of voltage for the charging. So this would be the source of voltage that does the charging, and this is what gets charged over here. And what you're essentially doing is you're overwhelming the EMF of the battery by driving a big current through the circuit that goes backward in the battery. So, of course, the 1.5-volt battery wants to push current out of its positive terminal this way, but it's being overwhelmed by the current that's being driven by the 12-volt potential in this picture here. So the net current will flow not up out of the 1.5-volt batteries' positive terminal, but rather back through it. And this puts energy back into the battery. It undoes the chemical reaction inside the battery. It allows this charge to separate again, for instance. And then when you unplug it, the chemical reaction that provides the electric potential difference in the first place can run forward. So this is how you recharge a battery. You basically have an overwhelming potential difference of some kind, a resistive load represented by the circuit that handles the charging, regulating the charging process. And then finally, you have the battery you actually want to charge at the other end of this process, and everything's connected together in a single circuit. So you can do things like ask questions like, what's the net voltage across the resistor? What direction is the net current in the circuit flowing? And which EMF device is supplying energy and which is absorbing energy? These are the questions that we would like to answer about this kind of circuit. In order to get started on answering these questions, we have to do our analysis of this a little bit more complex circuit with two EMF devices in a few steps. And these steps are going to come in handy because they are the basis of much more complicated circuit analysis. So the first thing we want to do in order to establish the voltage changes in a circuit like this so that we can figure out where the current is flowing is to just follow two simple steps. In order to find the voltage changes in the circuit, we basically have to walk a path through the circuit. And we want to figure out what that path is using some conventions. So first of all, we're going to choose a direction in this above loop that we believe current is flowing. It doesn't have to be correct at all. But once you make a choice, you have to stick with it. So that's the first step. Simply draw arrows indicating where you believe current could be flowing in the circuit. Now use conservation of charge. That is an important rule that you need to keep in mind. Charge is conserved in a closed system like this. So you don't get to draw current flowing one way in the circuit and then in the next leg flowing back this way. That doesn't make any sense. At that corner, current should continue to flow continuously into the next segment of the circuit. There are no branches here. Branches are something we'll learn to deal with in a bit. So the right way to draw the guess at which way current is flowing is a consistent, in this case, clockwise direction. You can draw it counterclockwise. Whatever direction you choose, choose it and stick with it for the rest of the problem. So let me just say that these are my chosen eyes. I believe current is flowing in this direction. Now if I'm wrong, we'll learn that at the end of solving the problem. It's OK to be wrong. It's just a guess. And your guess will be corrected by following the steps of using energy and charge conservation to understand this circuit. The second thing you need to do is, once you've established where you believe current may be flowing in this loop, you then have to pick a direction that you are going to walk through the loop. It doesn't have to be the direction in which current is flowing. If you really like going counterclockwise through a loop, you're welcome to do that. But once you pick the direction to walk the loop, you have to walk in that direction and stick with it. So let's demonstrate this. So this is a much prettier version of the hand sketch to drawing I just did. This shows the arrows that I have selected based on my guess as to where I think current eye is flowing in the circuit. Now we'll find out later that I'm wrong. I have the direction wrong, but that's OK. You do not have to be right when you make this guess. You must only be consistent. The second thing you have to do is choose a direction to walk the loop. So let's go ahead and do that. So I'm going to choose to walk the loop in the same direction that current is flowing. You don't have to do that, but once you make a choice, you have to do it and stick with it. So everything that happens after this will be based on these two steps. I chose the direction I think current is flowing, and I chose the direction that I would like to walk through the loop to set up and solve what will turn out to be the energy conservation equation. So I've used conservation of charge already to indicate the direction that current is flowing. Charge can't get to a corner in reverse direction. It has to keep going consistently and smoothly through the loop. That's the expression of charge conservation here. And I've also now written a random and arbitrary guess direction about what direction I would like to go through the circuit as I traverse the components in the circuit. And that is in input to the energy conservation equation application. OK, now a couple of additional rules to keep in mind. What we're going to do now is we're going to set up an equation that looks something like this. The total change in the electric potential differences in the circuit will be zero. If I walk a closed path through the circuit, going through one EMF device, then a resistor, then another EMF device, and then back to where I started, the net sum of all changes in electric potential difference must be zero. That is, in a closed system with no external source of energy coming in and no energy leaving the system, all the changes in energy must sum to zero. So this is the equivalent in a gravitational problem of moving an object through a closed path in a gravitational field. When you return back to the original place where you started, the net work done in making the journey is zero. So in our walk, which is going to be a walk through the circuit that takes us through an EMF device, a resistor, another EMF device, and then back to where we started, you have to keep in mind a few rules for the changes in potential difference through each of the devices. If your walk takes you through an EMF device, for instance, an ideal battery, from negative to positive terminal, then the change in potential is plus E. That is, the symbol for the potential change in an EMF device is this calligraphy E. And if you go from the negative terminal to the positive terminal, the change is plus E. That is, you should be gaining potential energy. If you go through an EMF device, for instance, again, an ideal battery, but you go from the positive terminal to the negative terminal, that is, you walk backward through the device, the change in potential is negative E. If you go through a resistor in the direction in which you chose current to be flowing, that is, if you follow the flow of current through a resistor, the resistor is pushing back against you, and so the change in potential is negative IR, that's just using Ohm's Law to write the potential change V through the resistor, and that is going to be negative IR, because again, the resistor's pushing back against the flow of current, and you have elected to draw the flow of current in a particular direction. So if you follow the current through the resistor, you're being resisted, and the change in current and change in voltage is negative IR. Finally, if you go through a resistor against the direction that you chose current to flow, the change in the potential is IR. You're moving in the direction now that the resistor is pushing against the current, and so you get a bump in potential. So let's apply these rules. My path is indicated in blue. I am first, I'm gonna start here, and I am going to walk through the circuit in a clockwise motion, according to this blue line, that also happens to be the direction that I chose current to flow in order to set up this problem. So the very first device that I will encounter in my walk is this one and a half volt potential difference, E1, and the positive terminal's up here, and the negative terminal is down here. That's the convention for the EMF device or battery symbol, and so I'm going from the negative to the positive terminal, and so my change in potential here is plus little curly E1. I then continue my walk through the circuit, and the next device that I encounter is the resistor. I have gone through the resistor in the direction that I have chosen current to flow, and so the potential change through here is negative IR1. That's the potential change that I experience traveling through the resistor. I now continue my walk through the circuit, and I encounter another EMF device, and I walk through it. But this time, I'm going from the positive terminal to the negative terminal, so the potential change that I experience here is curly E2 with a minus sign in front of it. And finally, my walk takes me through the conductor. There are no further changes in potential until I get back to my starting point, and I'm done. And according to the conservation of energy, the sum of all of these changes in potential must equal 0. Nice, simple equation to have to set up and solve. So that's what I've written down here. I have plus E1 minus I1R1 minus E2 equals 0. Now, I'm given the potential difference in the first battery. I'm given the potential difference in the second battery or second source of electric potential difference. I'm given the resistance. The circuit has an overall resistance of 100 ohm. And so from this, I can solve for the current that is going through the circuit. And I get this number, negative 0.105 amps. What does a minus sign mean here? Let's go to the Frequently Asked Questions page. What does it mean if I solve for current I, and that number is negative? Well, all it means is that when you chose the direction that you believed current was flowing, you chose the wrong direction. It's OK. You just have to make that guess and stick with it. At the end, if you do all your math correctly and you stick with your original guesses, you will get an answer that is correct for the circuit. And what the circuit is telling you is that no, no, no, you drew the arrow going clockwise. But actually, the net current in the circuit is going counterclockwise. And that's kind of what you would have expected. The potential on the right-hand side of this circuit diagram is far larger than the potential on the left-hand side. And as a result, you would expect this potential to overwhelm this potential and drive a current counterclockwise through the circuit. But now you can see it mathematically that that's true. If you apply Ohm's law, conservation of charge, and conservation of energy, the circuit tells you that the current actually is flowing in the counterclockwise direction opposite the direction you originally drew. And that's where you get the minus sign from. Now, if you had been very far-sighted at the beginning of the problem, and you said, no, I know just by looking at this that the current is going to go counterclockwise, and you drew your arrows to be counterclockwise at the end of the day, your current would have been positive 0.105 amps, meaning you just happened to choose correctly at the beginning of the problem. Now, let's take a look at a more complex situation. And we've already basically set up the things which are known as Kirchhoff's rules merely by writing down and using current and energy conservation, or charge and energy conservation. But we will formalize the process now to solve much more complicated circuit problems. Why should you care about this? Well, the reality is that the world is full of complex circuits. To be honest, the ones that humans have come up with, for the most part, are relatively simple. They don't require a tremendously difficult set of analysis in order to figure out what's going on inside of them. But nature is an excellent engineer of very complex circuit situations. And so if we want to model nature using the laws of physics, using charge conservation and energy conservation, we have to do things like represent natural phenomena using circuit diagrams. And one example of that is the neuron. The neuron is the beating heart of the transmission and storage of information in something like a brain. It is a complex network of neurons. And the configuration of the neurons is set by learning procedures. And those learning procedures involve the transmission of electrical signals across the length of the neuron itself. So you have some impulse that's transmitted from a stimulus that comes into the neuron through the dendrites. That stimulus is transmitted from the cell body of the neuron down the axon of the neuron to the terminal bundle. And the terminal bundle itself involves chemical transmission of information to other neurons through their dendrites. So if we think about this as a cable or some kind of complicated circuit body that's carrying impulses, electrical impulses along the length, we can actually make a great deal of progress in understanding just how information is transmitted through this system, which is in and of itself very complex. And in fact, this is one way that you can represent in an oversimplified way what the circuit looks like for the axon. So this is actually a circuit diagram which gets the basic transmission of electrical information through the axon about right. And it involves not just resistors, but resistors and capacitors. The capacitors can be charged up and discharged by changes in electric potential across them. When an electric potential is built up across a capacitor, it will store charge. If the electric potential from the external source is released, then the capacitor can release its charge back into the system. And you can imagine that there's a very complicated transmission of information down the length of this repeating system of resistor, capacitor, and resistor, and resistor, capacitor, resistor, resistor, resistor, capacitor, resistor, resistor, resistor, all the way down the axon down to the terminal nodes of the axon with a signal originating in the dendrites. The circuit, the capacitor and resistor segments you see here are physical representation of what are known as the nodes of Ranvier. The nodes of Ranvier are capable of storing and discharging charge. And so they are very well represented by capacitors. But they contain, of course, resistance to the flow of charge. And so one also has to insert a resistance into that circuit in order to model it more accurately. In between the nodes of Ranvier, you essentially can represent the interstitial fluid and the intracellular fluid as resistive media. They don't have to have the same resistances. And so electrical signals will propagate in a very complex way through the system with energy being stored in the capacitors released, and that's pulsed to the next capacitor, resistor, system, and then that's pulsed to the next capacitor, resistor, system, and so forth. So a signal can be transmitted down the length of this by applying a voltage on one end. That's the stimulus. The stimulus goes away. But meanwhile, the capacitor has been charged. When the stimulus goes away, this thing then discharges. It's charged to the next capacitor. That charges up. When its charge goes away, this then transmits to the next capacitor, and so forth. And so by doing this, you can do signal propagation down the length of an axon and model it using just a circuit diagram that looks like this. This leads to a very complicated set of outcomes that are actually fairly difficult to model with a very simple circuit I just showed you. Nonetheless, if you add more complexity to the circuit, you can essentially reproduce the gross features of the behavior of the neuron. A stimulus enters at some time. This causes a voltage to swing in the neuron from negative 70 millivolts, which is the resting potential of the neuron, all the way up to positive 30 millivolts Basically, what you're getting here is you're getting a closure of gates to the flow of sodium. Then sodium is allowed into the system. You get a net positive charge buildup, which creates a positive potential difference. And then at some point, you get potassium gates that open. This causes a large downswing of the charge, and thus a great decrease of the potential that overshoots the original resting potential goes as low as negative 90 millivolts. And then over time, this system will slowly go back to its resting potential by the potassium gates closing and potassium being trapped in the system again. So you have an active relationship between sodium and potassium pumps that move sodium in and potassium out. And this allows you to alter the electric potential difference in the system, which creates a voltage change. And this voltage change can be transmitted down the length of the axon through the resistor capacitor network to the terminal nodes and then potentially on to other neurons in the system. And all of this can be represented by a complex circuit system. So that's why it's important to master some of the basic skills of circuit analysis. There are many complex structures in nature. Biology is home to many of these. If one wants to come to a basic understanding of how signals are propagating through the system, a little circuit analysis under your belt will go a long way. As an example of a more complex circuit than the one that we looked at earlier with two batteries in it, consider the following one which has two batteries in it, but also branches and multiple resistors. So let's imagine that we were to start out taking a little journey around this circuit here from just before the left battery.  If we were a positive electric charge, you could imagine that maybe we are moved through battery one and then we turn the corner at point A and we continue through resistor one and then we turn the corner down here and we get to point D. And at this point we could go along one of two branches, one that takes us through resistor number three or one that takes us through resistor number two and then possibly backward through this second battery over here on the right until eventually we might return to point B and then the point where we actually started our journey. This is a multi-loop circuit. You see it has a left loop, it has a right loop that's about the same size in this drawing and it has a big outer loop as well. And in order to analyze these circuits we just have to keep applying the principles of charge conservation and energy conservation to understand what's going on in the circuit. Now in a problem involving complex circuits you'll often be given some amount of information. So for instance in this particular case we are told the electric potential delivered by battery number one. We're told the electric potential that's delivered by battery number two. We're also told that the resistances all have numerical values and they're all equal to two ohms. So they're all identical resistors although your mileage may vary and a problem that you get you may not be granted identical resistances for all of the resistors and you may have to combine resistors for instance if you can. You'll notice that what makes this problem more difficult than ones we've looked at before is that there's no simple way to combine neighboring resistors. For instance, this resistor is definitely in parallel with this resistor here. So two is in parallel with three but because you have two batteries in the system it's not clear how you combine these resistors and suck the battery in at the same time in order to get one battery hooked up to one resistor and then back to itself. And so that's what makes these multi-loop more complex circuits at first an apparently intellectual challenge to understanding what's going on in the circuit. But we are simply going to apply the rules of charge conservation and energy conservation. We're gonna use Ohm's law and we are going to tear this thing apart and figure out what's going on. And the things that we want to figure out are we want to find current number one, we want to find current number three, the current that moves down through the middle vertical branch of the circuit and we want to find current number two which here is the current going through resistor two in the right branch of the circuit. So we have three currents, we don't know what they are and so at this point we are tasked with attempting to figure out exactly what those currents are. So what we want to do first is the same trick we played with the simpler circuits before. We first want to figure out what direction that we believe current is moving in the circuit. Now, this picture has sort of handed us a treat. The picture indicates some suggestions for how current might be flowing in the circuit. So for instance, if we were to imagine the current that's flowing through the top left battery then down through resistor one, the drawing that we've been given already conveniently gives us the current direction as pointing downward through R1. Now that may not turn out to be the actual direction that current is flowing in this particular circuit in that part of the circuit. It's merely an assumed direction of current flow but quite often you will be given a situation where in fact you do not have this information handed to you. So for instance, I might white out this arrow here and then we can repeat this exercise for the other arrows that are here. You can clear that one out as well. So we'll just erase that current arrow, get rid of the helpful suggestion placed here by the original drawing from Wiley and then finally we can erase this arrow as well. This is a much more common situation that you might be handed. In one of your homework problems, you're given suggestions for the direction that the current might be flowing already through the circuit. But that isn't necessarily what will happen on an arbitrary circuit analysis problem. You may simply be given a picture that looks something like this and be left to completely figure it out on your own. So for instance, the way that you would figure it out on your own is you would make some guesses about which way you think current is flowing. And remember, when you get to a branch in the circuit, that is a location like this, a node in the circuit where current can flow one way or another, you have to use conservation of charge to determine how you're gonna break up the currents. So let's start with the left branch of the circuit. We might imagine that current could be flowing like this, just the way that that original arrow had been drawn. And if we follow that current I1 through resistor one, eventually we get over to this first node, node D. Let me erase this here so it's clear that that's a D. So we get to node D. And now we could have a few situations that are occurring. It could be that this current from I1 splits into two currents, I3 and I2. And we see those written over here, I2 going through resistor two, I3 going through resistor three. But that's not the only option. We could instead guess that, well maybe what's happening is that current is coming down through resistor three and it meets the current from resistor one and it then merges like two streams merging together to become a single stream or river. And then that current then flows through I2 and up through I2 like this. All right, so you see you have a tremendous amount of freedom here to write a picture of where you think current is flowing and your only constraint is that at a node, the current going in, I in, must be equal to the current going out. So if you have one current coming in, like I1 to this node and another current coming in to the node, like I3, the resulting current must add up to I2. So in the picture I've drawn, this is what is called the node equation for node D. There's a similar node equation for node B. Let's take a look and see if we can figure out what it is. So at node B, we know that over here on the left branch of the circuit, the current is traveling leftward and then downward through the resistor. So the current I1 is coming out of node B. We also have current going down through resistor three, which means that current is coming out of node B as well. And then finally we have the current coming in from resistor two backward through battery two and then entering in to node B. So see if you can before I write it down here, see if you can figure out what the equation is that represents conservation of charge at this node and I'll give you a few seconds to think about it. Well, if we think of the current two as coming into the node, then I2 must be splitting and becoming I1 plus I3. That's the only way that this could possibly work. And what's great about this is if you've done a good job with your circuits and you've actually consistently used the direction of current flow in your nodes, you'll notice that these two equations are exactly the same. They must both be true. They can't conflict about what's going on in the circuit if you've consistently used your assumed direction of current flow. And you'll notice that here we have I1 plus I3 equals I2 at node D and then at node B, bravo, we have I2 equals I1 plus I3, which is exactly the same formula. So this is a good built-in cross check that you have consistently used the assumed current directions that you write down. If you've inconsistently used them, you will get conflicting equations that give you different answers for how I1, I2, and I3 relate to one another and you'll be unable to solve the problem as a result. So I always recommend that the current conservation at the nodes in the circuit, places where you have current splitting or merging, okay? Those are the places where you wanna try writing down after you've drawn your arrows, try writing down your current conservation equations and make sure that they don't give you conflicting pictures of how the currents relate to one another. If they do, you've made a mistake someplace and you should go back and double check your work. So let's take a look at the next step. I'm gonna put the arrows back that come from the original problem in the textbook. On the left branch through resistor one, current one is moving downward. Through the middle branch through resistor three, current is also moving downward. And then as a result of current conservation, it has to be moving upward through resistor two because at this node you have two currents meeting and you can't have a third current meeting there or all that would ever be happening is that charge would be building up at node D and never escaping. If it comes in from two branches, it has to go out the other. That's the only way for this to work out and actually for charge to be conserved so that it's not building up someplace in your circuit secretly and quietly out of your view. So I2 has to go up once you've chosen one and three to go down through the left and middle branches. Now the next step is to apply energy conservation in the various loops inside of your circuit. Now as I said earlier, there are three loops in this circuit.  And I've labeled the left small loop loop one and the right small loop loop two. And then to be conscientious, I should, oh actually I do have that over here, I've labeled the large outer loop loop three. Now what do you have to do at this point? Well remember earlier when we defined loops, we were doing it because we were going to take a walk through our circuit. And you're going to do the same thing here. You're going to take a walk through each of the loops in your circuit and you're going to write down equations that represent the conservation of energy along that walk. The sum of the changes in potential along your walk through your circuit must equal zero. That is the guiding principle of energy conservation here. The net change in energy in any closed system is zero. Conservation of energy. We've already used conservation of charge at the nodes. Now we're going to use conservation of energy. So what I have done here on this blank page is to merely reproduce the salient features of the formal diagram from the textbook for this particular problem. And if I go back just one slide here, I'm going to draw the loops just so that we have them here. So the loop one is the loop around the little left side of the circuit. And I've decided to walk that loop in a clockwise manner. Similarly, I've decided to walk loop two, the right hand little loop in a clockwise manner. And just to be extremely consistent, I've decided to walk the whole outer loop of the circuit, loop three, in a clockwise manner. So we're going to be taking little journeys through the circuit now and using energy conservation to write down another set of equations. So we know from the nodes in this equation here. Let me write those down first. Actually, to be nice and consistent with the colors I've shown here, let me do blue. So the node equations, which we can get from applying the exercise we went through a few moments ago with current conservation, are going to be that at node B, we have the equation that I2 flows in. And I1 and I3 flow out. And so the sum of I1 and I3 must be equal to I2. And at node D, we have I1 and I3 flowing in. And those are equal to the only other thing left here, which is I2, which is flowing out. And you see we have here consistent equations with one another based on the picture that we drew of which way we assume current to be traveling. May not actually be traveling that way, but we'll figure that out when we solve for these currents. OK, but we're not quite there yet. We've got to do some walking. So we're going to take a counterclockwise journey through loop 1. So now we have to write down what are known as the loop equations. And this exercises conservation of energy. So that's the operating principle for this stage of the setup of the problem. And remember, our goal is to figure out numerically what are I1, what are I2, and what are I3. And to do that, we have to apply these principles, conservation of charge, conservation of energy, and then we can get answers. OK, great. So loop 1, that's the first loop that I've drawn here. It's this little loop on the left. And I'm going to start walking it from just below this resistor. I could pick anywhere in the loop as long as I walk in the direction I just indicated, clockwise. So I'm going to start from R1, and I'm going to follow my loop. And the first thing I'm going to do is I'm going to go through R1. And I'm going to do that in the direction opposite to which current is flowing. The resistor is pushing against current. So this gives me a boost in potential of I1, R1. I then go through the battery, E1, on the next leg of my journey. And I do so from the positive terminal to the negative terminal. And so that's going to cost me energy. And I lose by a potential change of negative E1. Finally, I'm going to get to point B, and I'm going to come down through resistor 3. And when I travel through resistor 3, I'm going to be doing so in the direction that current is flowing. That's going to cost me. So I have to deduct I3, R3. I get down to point D. I coast back to my starting point. And I'm right back where I started. And so that's the end of my journey. And the sum of all of those terms must be equal to 0. Let's repeat. We're going to do loop 2 next. And again, I'm going to walk this in a clockwise fashion. And I'm going to similarly start my journey just before a resistor. So when I go through R2, I'm going against the current. And I'm going to gain in potential when I do that. So that's I2, R2. I then come down the bottom of the loop, head over to node D, head up through resistor 3. When I go through resistor 3, I'm opposing the flow of current. So I'm going to gain again by I3, R3. That's my gain in potential. And then finally, I'm going to coast through node B. And then through battery 2, going from the negative terminal to the positive terminal, the direction that it would like to push current. And in that case, I'm going to get a boost in potential as well. Now you might be wondering, wait a second. I have a bunch of sums of terms equal to 0. How can that be? Well, remember, it's not necessarily true that we have drawn the current arrows in the correct direction. And so it's possible that one or more of the currents, I2 and I3, could be, in fact, negative numbers. And they will actually subtract in this equation. We just have to faithfully write the equation down. We traveled backward through resistor 2 against the flow of current. We traveled backward through resistor 3 against the through of current. We went through the battery of the direction it wants to push us. Our arrows for current could be backward. We'll find out at the end of this exercise. And finally, we have the big outer loop, the beltway of this particular problem, going all the way around resistor 3 and avoiding it. So for that, what I'm going to do is I'm going to start my journey from node D. And I'm going to walk the big outer loop, again, in a clockwise fashion like this along the outside. It's good to make pictures for this. It helps you to remember what you're intended to do and then check that you actually did what you intended. So for loop 3, we're going to start at point D. We're going to move around here. And the first thing we're going to do is we're going to go through resistor 1. And we're going to do it against the flow of current. So we're going to gain in potential by I1R1. We're going to go through battery number 1 from positive to negative. We're going to lose potential there, negative E1. Now we're going to coast through node B and head through battery 2 in the direction it wants to push us. So we're going to gain by adding E2. And we're going to come down through resistor 2 against the flow of current. We're, again, going to gain by I2R2. And then we're going to finish our journey back at node D. And so the sum of all that must be equal to 0. What we have just done is apply Kirchhoff's rules. Kirchhoff is essentially famous for having applied charge conservation and energy conservation to the analysis of circuits. And so the rules that we just wrote down bear his name. The node equations and the loop equations, the node rules and the loop rules. Current must be conserved at the nodes, charge conservation. Energy must be conserved and sum to 0 in terms of changes in energy if you walk a closed path. That's what we did in the circuit for the loop equations. And we set those equations equal to 0, applying energy conservation. Now here comes the beautiful part of the application of Kirchhoff's rules. The loop equations and the node equations to solving the problems. What do we want? That's the question we have to ask ourselves at the end of any exercise and just mindlessly writing down equations. Just writing down the equations is not going to get you to the answer. You have to know what you want. And what we want are to find I1, I2, and I3. So we have three unknowns. And you'll notice that many of these equations all contain at least one or two of those unknowns. The node equations contain all three of them. And the loop equations tend to contain the currents and pairs because of the way this circuit happens to be laid out. So here's the beautiful part. The rule of thumb is in the application of Kirchhoff's rules, you just need to use all but one of your loop equations and all but one of your node equations to solve the problem. In this case, you'll see that that gives you exactly, let's say we were to pick loop one and loop two as our two loop equations. It doesn't matter which two you pick. You just have to pick two of them, all but one of them. So two in our case. I could pick the loop one equation and the loop two equation. That gives me two equations. And then if I pick, for instance, the node B equation because it doesn't matter, the two node equations are identical to one another, I have three equations. I have three unknowns. And algebraically, I can solve that situation. So this is your strategy. In applying Kirchhoff's rules to solve a problem, you should first choose the direction that you think current is flowing, conserving current at the nodes.  You should then choose loops in the circuit and what direction you're going to walk through them to set up the loop equations. That will give you a number of loop equations and how you move through resistors with regards to the direction of the current flow you wrote down determines changes in potential, how you move through the batteries forward or backward will determine the changes in potential through the batteries. You sum all those changes up. You set them equal to zero. You do that for each loop and you get loop equations from that. And then in this case, you have three unknowns. So you're going to need three equations. And you can in this case use all but one of your loop equations and all but one of your node equations and you can solve the problem. Algebraically, you should be able to do this at this point. So let's walk through this. What we'll do is we will pick the loop one and loop two equations and we will pick the node B equation because it doesn't matter whether we pick the node B or node D one. And we'll see if we can solve the problem for this particular situation. So on this page I've rewritten the node equation that I selected and the two loop equations that I selected from the previous slide. And now what I want to do is I want to start solving these equations for instance, one of the currents and substitute those solutions from one equation into another until finally I isolate only a single one of the currents. I can solve for it and then I can put that answer back into my equations and solve for the others. Eventually for instance, if I can figure out I one and I three, I get I two for free from the first equation. Or if I figure out I two and I one, I get I three for free from the first equation. So your goal should be in this particular situation to try to isolate two of the currents, solve for them exactly and then plug those back into the node equation at the top and solve for the third one. All right, so let's go ahead and do that. Now one of the things that's kind of convenient is that by combining a couple of these equations we can actually eliminate already a few things. So for instance, you'll notice that if you were to add together the two loop equations, one of them contains a term that's negative I three R three and the other one contains a term that's positive I three R three and you could eliminate that term right away. The other thing, of course, that you could do is you could in fact subtract these two equations and that would give you a term that involves two I three R three and another term that involves for instance the differences in currents I one and I two multiplied by their resistances respectively. So we have a bunch of things that we can do. There's no one rule of thumb I would give you at this point for how to go through this. It's algebra, you're gonna have to grind through it. There are easier ways and there are hard ways and it's sort of up to your skill level at this point. I'm gonna just try to mindlessly plow through this just to demonstrate what we do, okay? So for instance, one of the things that I could do would be to rewrite this equation, the first loop equation here in solve for I one. So I think I will go ahead and do that. So that will give me I one in terms of I three and these resistances and voltages from the batteries which we already know. So let's take the loop one equation, okay? And I'm just gonna reproduce it over here I one R one minus E one minus I three R three equals zero and I'm gonna rewrite it and solve for instance I one, okay? So I will isolate the term with I one on the left-hand side and this will be equal to E one plus I three R three and now I can divide both sides by R one and I've accomplished my goal of having an equation that has I one on one side and the other terms on the other side, okay? So that now gives me an equation for I one. Let me box that up there and I'm now going to insert that into one of my other equations. Well, the only other equation that contains I one is the loop equation or the node equation up on the top. So let's take the node equation and that's I two equals I one plus I three okay, great. So now I can go ahead and I can plug in I one and this will give me now a relationship purely between I two and I three and this will come in handy because you'll notice I have I two and I three in this equation down here and if I can get I two written in terms of I three in the same way that I got I one written in terms of I three, I can substitute it back into the bottom equation and I can solve for I three and that's gonna be my goal right now. I'm gonna try to solve for I three first. All right, so writing here with my substitution, I'm gonna have one over R one E one plus I three R three plus I three, okay, that's gonna be equal to I two and I think at this point what I will do is I will go ahead and substitute, I will try to group the terms in terms of I three here. So for instance, I have, because I'm eventually gonna want to isolate I three anyway. So why don't I go ahead and rewrite this as E one over R one plus R three over R one I three plus I three and now you can see very easily how to group the I three terms. E one over R one plus this whole thing, R three over R one plus one times I three and that again, that whole thing is equal to I two. So now I can put that into the loop two equation and I know this looks like a mess but hey, it's algebra.  All right, so I'm gonna put that in here. So I've got I two R two plus I three R three plus E two equals zero and I'm gonna go ahead and substitute my I two that I just got into this. So it won't look pretty but that's okay.  Whew, this looks like a nightmare but it's really not that bad. Now our goal just has to be to isolate the terms involving I three, move everything else to the other side of the equation and solve for I three. So let's go ahead and isolate the terms involving I three first. So what I'm gonna do to get this done is I'm going to multiply through here by R two.  Haven't exactly picked an easy road here but that's okay because now I can group my terms. So I'm going to have the following, E one R two over R one. Let me move E two over here and group these together plus, all right, well I've got R three R two over R one plus R two plus R three and that's all times I three equals zero. And now I can move stuff to the other side here. So I'm gonna wind up with the following equation. I three is equal to the negative of E one R two over R one plus E two all divided by this mess.  Okay, and now I could plug my numbers and I've got numbers for all this stuff. One thing that I could do to make this look a little prettier would be to actually take R one out of the denominator here. So if I pull an R one out of the denominator down here or conversely pull the R one out of the denominator up here, I'll get a slightly simpler equation out of this. It will wind up just be something like this.  And that's not so bad. And so at this point we could go ahead and plug that into for instance a calculator and get a number out the other end. And the numerical answer that we get is negative 3.5 amps. Now again, think back to the frequently asked questions. What does that minus sign mean? Well, what that minus sign means is if we go back to our picture and we look at I three, we originally drew I three to be pointing down. But in fact, the math tells us that we chose incorrectly but that's okay. What's really going on is that there are 3.5 amps flowing upward through resistor three. All right, so if one wanted to go ahead and represent this, this means that we have upward current in resistor three. So it turns out at this point, we're nearly there because we've already got an equation that relates I one and I three to one another and we just got a numerical answer for I three. We know R one, E one and R three. We can go plug in and solve for I one. So that's what we're gonna do. So here is our answer for I three. We have our equation for I one and all you have to do now is plug negative 3.5 amps in here, put all your other numbers in and calculate and you'll very quickly get a numerical answer for this. And the numerical answer that we get if we grind through the math, put it into our calculator is we find out that this is one amp. So the good news is we got a plus sign on this one which means if we go back to our picture one more time and look at where we drew the current I one, we said that, oh, I'm gonna guess that that's pointing down through R one. Total guess, turned out to be right. In fact, the current is in this circuit pointing downward and it has a numerical value of one amp in that left branch of the circuit. And so we're nearly there now. We've got now finally our answer for I one. And remember we have the other node law to help us to relate I one and I three and I two. So we have that I two is the sum of I one and I three. And this one is probably the easiest situation we have. We've already gotten I three and I one. We have one amp. We have negative 3.5 amp. And so the answer is negative 2.5 amp. So let's make sure that everything makes sense. We find that this current is in fact moving down in R one. We found that current I three was moving upward through resistor three, so upward instead of downward where we originally drew it. And we find that the current I two is moving downward because we got a minus sign on that one downward in R two. So let's just quickly sketch our drawing one more time and make sure that this all makes sense. So here's resistor one, here's resistor three and here's resistor two. And what the answers we got say are that the current should be moving down in R one. It should be moving down in R two. And finally, if we look back at three, it's supposed to be moving upward in R three. Let's make sure that this works. If we have current coming down here and flowing into this node, we expect that, and we also have current coming down here and flowing into this node from this side, the other current has to go out of the node in order for current to be conserved and in fact, it is. So everything is self-consistent in the picture. Current is flowing into nodes, but not exclusively into nodes. It's flowing in and some of it's flowing out and so current can be conserved in that situation. These all look like sound answers based on the physics principles of current conservation and energy conservation that have been applied here. So in summary, if you exercise Ohm's law, current conservation, charge conservation and energy conservation and apply that set of principles to circuits, you can solve in a fairly neat manner, seemingly complex situations involving multiple batteries, multiple resistors and even capacitors in the future. Kirchhoff's rules are merely a restatement of charge conservation and energy conservation and applying those rules by making some assumptions about current flow and making little loops, little walks around loops in the circuit and applying the principles of charge conservation and energy conservation will let you solve even seemingly complex situations involving multiple voltages and current flows in a complex circuit. And I hope that this will help you with homework problems and get you started on training how to set up and solve these sorts of difficult problems by applying core physics principles and basic rules of algebra to tackle them.


This week saw some exciting investments and fundings getting raised by the Indian startup ecosystem. Hello there, this is Bhaveya Kaushal and here are 4 funding news of the week. This week saw another startup getting added to the Unicorn Club of India. BigBasket entered the billion dollar valuation club after it raised $150 million in series F round of funding. Indian startups have the back of big business magnets and Radhan Tata is definitely one of them. He recently invested an undisclosed amount in Ola Electric Mobility as part of series A round of funding. The logistics space remains as evergreen as ever. Locusts, a logistics optimization startup raised $20 million in a funding round led by Tiger Global, Falcon Edge and some of its existing partners. Indian fitness startups are seeing a boom in the investment space. After Sarva, fitness startups Cure Fit and Fitenity raised $75 million and $4 million respectively this week.


Help us! Oh, dammit. Yeah! Oh, so- sorry! Sorry I didn't mean to hit you! Ah! Oh, God, what was that? Oh, okay, we got... Colocants? Relic? Oh, look, it's Subnautica! Hello, everybody, and welcome to... Crab Island! No, it's collision course and... Oh, God. This guy had a messy jelly sandwich. Oh, it's a horseshoe crab! Oh, that's great! Is it right click? I don't pick stuff up again. Oh, it's G! Of course, interact is G! Okay, we are back in collision course, and we've got a new way we're starting up now. I wonder if we can swim over to the... the crash over there. We should try that. Once we... Once we collect our specs... Oh, it's F! Oh, my God, there's crabs everywhere!  Jesus! Is it dead? Oh! Are they all dead? Oh, my God! Is it F? What was it again? No, it's not F. G-H. No. Uh... Oh, no, it is H. Okay, what is this? Oh, here we go. Here we go. A winch! A stana winch from the ship. Ooh! And what is the primary sensor from the ship? Uh, I have a bio scanner. Scan for biological signatures with a 75-meter range drain survival suit. Ooh! Cool! What is this one? D. And there's a flashlight. Aha! Fantastic. If I click Q... I can see the... Oh, no! The crab that I shot is dead! Oh, fantastic! So, we're going to do the Subnautica thing. How he feels it. Haha! That guy was about to talk. I was just... Oh! I mean, this looks like a 3D model, right? This doesn't look like it's just something in the background. Can I walk up it? Oh, it hasn't even got any colliders on it. Are you kidding me? At least I've put something here for me. Okay, new game! Oh, perfect. Yeah, what? Oh, whoa! What? I've got different things this time. I got... Oh, my God. That's a drone head or something. Oh, that's great. And we got medikits. Oh, I can combine those. Hold on. Hold on. I remember this. You can take this. And take that. Wait. Oh, no. Oh, dammit. No! I used an energy cell! Oh, dammit. Okay. Well, we've got to keep an eye out for more energy cells. Because then we can actually make a bomb. Yeah! Well, now let's go into the great unknown. It looks Earth-like. It looks Earth-like. Whoa, what's that? A perfectly placed T-Rex skull? Oh, let's go investigate.  Obviously doesn't have a funny bone in his body. Ah! Oh, dude, we got peeps. I'm assuming they're not going to be friendly, right? I mean, we've bumped into people before, and they're never friendly. Are you a raptor? Are you just going to go around? Can I shoot you? Oh, a stick! Yes! Take it! Oh, my God. They're so not going to be friendly. Look at the way they walk. It's like four. Why is my thing not picking up that there's four of them? Oh, okay. Hi! There's loads of people here. Can I talk to you? F? Can I pick you up? Can I put you in my inventory? Oh, what have you got here? I'm going to take all your stuff. We've got a drone. Hey, buddy. Hi! You walk normal. Oh, do you sell things? Trader, look at this. Stay back, my drone doesn't like strangers. We could use more protein. Oh, okay. So I can trade meat and stuff now. Oh, I want a capacitive shotgun. Oh, my God. Give me that. How do I get that? I need to give you meat. Am I not allowed a gun in here? Whoa, what?  Oh, my God. Okay. What is the whole head of triceratops things? Create a distraction. Create a distraction. More like throw it. There you go. And in the head. Yeah. Oh, they put blood in it. Oh, my God. What's going on? Can I hold on? Can I just take this out and throw it in again? Oh, my God. I can. I'm so sorry, buddy. Hold on.  Come back here, guys. One kill. And again.  Is he dead? No, now he is. All I need is one spear. In the eye. Let me let me. Oh, Jesus. Fair enough you've made your point. Oh, there we go. Oh, my God. It's good as gold. Yeah. Telling me, I got so many. All right. Whatever. Okay. Let's see if we can get a shotgun from all this meat. Hi, guy. Take your meat. Yum yum. It's good as gold. Yeah, I know. But I've killed you before. Hi. Right. Okay. Can I trade you? I don't know. What do I do? Oh, okay. Okay. Right. So I need eight bits of meat for the shotgun, which I've done. There you go. Can I have it now? Can I have? Yes. We have a shotgun. Awesome. Okay. A stimpack. Well, I don't really care about that thermal shielding. I don't think I need that for a tent. And I don't know what these do. Hold on. Maybe we need the cell. I think we need the cell. Okay. Hold on. I'm going to harvest more meat. I really hope it doesn't have a night cycle. I feel like he will.  I hate night in so many games. Why do they put night in games? God. Hi. I'm back again. I could use my shotgun on you. Okay. That one. Trade. Yes. Give me. Nice. Yes. I want more. Give me more. I mean, I don't need another shotgun, right? Ooh, I should have saved up for the... I should have got the medium pack, shouldn't I? I wonder what cooked meat goes for. Like, can you actually make cooked meat? Unable to access the infodou menu at this time. Why? Wee! Full shotgun. Yes. And my clip is not very good. I don't know what simp units are. So all I need to do... Oh! Why did I pick this up? I don't even know where I got this from. I'm just cycling through to try and get to me. There it is. Oh, yes. Now that's a weapon. Hey, buddy. Bam! Bam! Bam! Bam! Oh, my God. He takes a few shots, doesn't he? That's a stick. Oh, no! Oh, God! I was going to say, not charging me, are they? I got one. Ah! I got another one. Oh, yes. Yes, you give me all of the good... Oh, I'm out. Oh, never mind. Oh, yes. Where do they go going, son? Okay, never mind. Let's just take the meat. Oh, this is awesome. Oh, my God. I actually really like this game. Okay. Okay. Okay. The fact that you can get the currency so quick is brilliant. I love it. Well, let me grab. I have to grab from the head. There we go. Okay. So we're going to spend this. Oh, God. I keep on clicking the wrong thing.  All right. So what we're going to do is we're going to go there and we're going to buy a medium pack. Awesome. Oh, yes. Oh, that's fantastic. Okay. If you wait here, I'll be right back. Oh, parasol. So many parasols. Oh, we must go see. Oh, my God. Yeah. Oh, wow. They have weird animations, but I want to see them anyway. Hold on. We must approach them so they don't see us. Oh, I love them. Oh, wow. Hi. Oh, they look exactly like the Lost World ones. Hi. How you doing? Do you like me when I look? He's like pivoting on the spot. Hi. Can I get close? Oh, do you get scared? Oh, God.  Oh, wow. Oh, that animation. Oh, it's beautiful. Look at them go. Tripwire. Oh, that's cool. And snare. Oh, okay. Oh, this is me. I think. Is this me? God knows. What is this place? Oh. Hello. Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah! He's being polite and just waiting for me. Oh, I was about to go for my backpack. Okay. Okay. Fair enough. Fair enough.  This is good to know. Why is he not picking them up? Oh, oh. Oh, one of the only ones left. Oh, there's stegos. Oh, wow. Is that a baby stego? Okay. So these guys, right. And the stegos, they do move in heads. Right. Well, I know you guys give loads of food. So if you don't mind. One shot. One shot. One kill. Yes. Give me it all. Oh, there it is. Here's the one with the spear. Now we need to hunt something else. Get really close to this stego. With our mask. And then we go sod it. And we pull out a shotgun.  And again. Oh, I missed him. He's running away. Look at him go. Oh, wait. I missed him. Hold up. Hold up. Wait a second. Wait a second, please. Bam. Oh, my God. Okay. Is this salt water? Where did I get a horseshoe crab from? Get rid of it. Oh, is this food? Can I cook it? Well, I didn't want that. I want all of him. Give me all the food. Yes. So I can just pick up hermit crabs. Wait, what? It just counts as raw meat. If I just pick up a hermit crab.    I swear down.  Well, I can't even draw weapons though. So they obviously know that's what people would do. I have all of these. And I want another one. Take. Oh, I can't. Can I have it back then? No. Ew, bugger you. So I can't transfer. Great. So I've just lost all that meat. Fantastic. Oh, great. Okay. Well, give me that. Shot accuracy is 90%? Oh, is that 80? What kind of font is this? Wait, hold on. How come I can have my gun out now? Oh, God. Oh, yeah. It's attacking. Oh, God. Oh, wow. Okay. Hold on. Hold on. I need to use my med kit. Oh, did I just die? I died. I could take him out though. I could do it. Did I get him? Oh, he's moving. Oh, no. Oh, die, robot scum.  He's like the Terminator. Oh, God, no more help. Oh, I can use that to sleep. Oh, I just need three more twigs.  All I need to do is just grab all of these damn hermit crabs. Wait, are you going to charge me? I was going to say, yeah, don't charge me. Just let me harvest the crabs. How about we set up a little tent out here? We're going to tab. We're going to crafting. We're crafting a tent. And then I guess I place it here. Awesome. Yes, it's day.  Oh, there's so many brachiosaurus. Oh, wow. Oh, that's great. Nice. Oh, OK. Is that normal? I'm going to take some health just in case. Thank you. What? Are you? Are you OK with this? You're completely OK with this. What? What's happening? Oh, I can have my gun out here. Oh, fantastic. Hold on. Hold on. Let me save. Bam. Bam. Bam. Three. There you go. Yes. I'm not going to stop till you're dead, son. Oh, and you hold on. Oh, my God. Oh, my God. He's right on me below. Come on. Oh, did I do it? I got an achievement. Look at that. They would never do this hard. Look at this.  Oh, my God. I'm sorry. You just got loads of good meat in you. Oh, my God, yes. Solar panel. I don't know what that is, but that's ammo clip. Expands water carrying capacity. Oh, I didn't see that in the dark. Oh, no. I got dysentery. No, stop drinking it. Stop it. It's another escape pod. Oh, my God. Oh, he's glorious. Oh, it's guarded by a Spino, though. Oh, they deliberately placed that there. Oh, this is great. Oh, are you ready for a boss battle, guys? Yes. Right. Let's go to Hangar now and get some cheeky shots off. Not that mask. Oh, he's with the... Yeah, there you go. Oh, yeah. That's a good depth of field. This goes on headshots. Yep. There you go.  It's my luck cowardice, but it's not really. How much ammo do I have? Oh, my God. I'm running out. Take it. You want to go watch with the depth of field? Oh, we can't get up here. Can you? You can't get up here. Yeah. Oh, fantastic. We got you, son.  Oh, let's just hope there's no more. Let me harvest you. You should get better stuff instead of just meat. But I guess, like, meat actually has a purpose now. So a halo could be worse. What's in it? Oh, my God. What's that? How many of those lasers do I have? How many of these do I want? Annie Bellnooks? Cues all diseases. Oh, that'll be even my dysentery. Oh, it's fantastic. What's that running around? Oh, the little dryos. Die! Die! Welcome to Ventriloquist Hour. Do you like this game? Yes, it's really good. Let's just turn them into meat. You are free of dysentery. I'm free. Okay. How many sticks do I have? Oh, I can make a tent. Yeah. Oh, wait, and it's six. Okay, one more stick, and we've got ourselves a tent. Oh! Oh, God save. Ammo added. Oh, I got a simp. Oh, fantastic. Craft, please. No. Yeah! Whee! Done and done. Oh, and there's a pregnancy on the horizon.  It's not like you can really get away from me, is it? It kind of like... Oh, my God, the blood is spewing down. Bya! Bya! Call me Colin Trevorrow. Get it?  Hold on. I got a better weapon. Yeah. I can just, like, jam it in your leg constantly. Oh, yeah, you can tell which one I've attacked, because he's still got the thing in him. At least that's where I save Ammo. Oh, God, no. I hit the wrong one. I can't tell which one's which now. Oh, there's the T-Rex. Hey, buddy. Over here. Come on. Come on.  Where is he? Come on, then. Bite each other. Jurassic versus Cretaceous. You guys going to fight? You going to fight? No, don't back up. Oh, God, the volcano's erupted. Jesus Christ. It's like falling kingdom. Ah. Hold on. Can I, like, throw spears through to him? No. Yeah. Coward. Come back here. Hey, buddy. Boom. Oh, my God. He's running away.  Oh, thank you, guys. You did great. Look at him all the way over there. Bam. I'm going to get him back over here. I'm going to throw more spears. Am I going to get it in his head? Boom.  He's coming. Run.  Get closer. You can't touch him.  You don't know how to get me. Oh, God. Bring a sword, though. Don't let him get close to me. Oh. I just want to spear him in the face. Oh, God. Oh, no, no, no, no. Run away. Don't run away. You're my salvation. Oh, no. I'm getting here, though. Oh, bring a sword. Stop being cowards. Help us.  Sorry I didn't mean to hit you. Oh, God. Yeah. Oh, God. Is he dead? Is he dead? Oh, my God. That was indignified, wasn't it? Yes. Oh, you are dead. Ha. Oh, enough. There you go. Marvelous creatures. Well, I guess I'll take it for now. But I want to know where this dropped. Oh, look at that. Why couldn't you get more iconic than that? Was this like a Spinosaur on a hill? Right, but I do have the solar panel. So I'm getting close towards it.  Why does your face look like that? Why is it so smooth? Yeah, I'm getting close to earning a suit that allows me to survive during the day. Like, or like recharge myself. Raised by Brackus Stucko Soros. Oh, there's power. There's a power in here. Oh, he's calling out. He's lost. This is where we do the mask. There he is. Ooh. Oh, that looks cool. Look at that shot. That was awesome. Oh, there's more. There's more of them. Holy crud. Oh, God. Oh, God. There's a T-rex. Oh, he's going to hunt the Paris. He's going in. Oh, they're all alerted. Oh, wow. Oh, that looks so cool. We need a crouch though. We need a crouch. That's like the thing from walking with dinosaurs. You just need them wrong. Oh, no. Not good. Not good. Not good. Not good. Oh, it's coming over here. It's coming over here. I'm killing the Paris though. Oh, a spear. Take it. Can I fast travel now? Yeah, fast travel. Oh, my God. It's the same brachiosaurus. Although they look like they've seen better days. Oh, my God. What happened to you guys? Okay. It doesn't look very good, all right. It's the easiest way to fill the spears and keep getting them back. Oh, God. Oh, no. Oh, no. T-rex. No. No. No. Go away. I don't want you. Oh, he's coming for me. Oh, he's coming. Oh, die. Die. Honestly, another one though. Oh, no. We can't even get a bit from it. Oh, God, bring your swords. I need you to have more than ever. Oh, God. Moving. Can't see him. Come on, then. Oh, sorry, brachiosaurus. Sorry. Oh, don't move backwards. Give me, give me, give me. I'm clicking everything. It's not working. My God, I can keep up with it, though. Okay. Okay. Here we go. Yeah. Die. Oh, God. Where is it? Oh, no. This isn't so good. Oh, it's dead. Oh, I didn't see it turn blue. Oh, my God. That is two T-Rexes. Oh, wow. Look at that for a picture. Wow. The graphics in this game are beautiful. They really are.  But, you know, five spears for a T-Rex as well as a shotgun blast. Yeah, that'll do. I mean, as long as you've got brachiosaurus as a friend. You're okay. Ooh, what's that?  Did I get him? Oh, he got scared. He got spooked. He's spooked by the volcano. Is it erupting behind me? Oh, my God. What's going on? Oh, there it is. Where's the raptor? Oh, there's the raptor. Come back here, you. Hey, up. Bop. It's like, no, please.   You're a copyright infringement. Bah! I can just store all the food in the tent and just come backwards and forwards. Yeah. There you go. That's the ticket. Now let's go claim our prize. What remains a goofball? And I'm trying to think, where was that raptor? The raptor slid down a cliff. Let's go take all of our meat and, uh, sell it. I don't know how to do sip things, though. I can't sip. Oh, Lord. Oh, this is it. This is another chance to get loads of meat. Oh, they're alerted to the Spino. Oh, it's my favorite. Lucky's already got me spearing him. All right. We don't need guns. All we need. Ow. Stop. Why are you doing this? Look, you're low-poly. Don't do this. Look at him.  You don't stand a chance against my brachiosaurus wall. Look at this. He's trying to get me through it. Oh. As long as I only hit the Spino, we're good. Yes. You don't stand a chance, son. Oh, I missed him. Oh, he's coming around this way. Come around this way, are you? I can't waste any spears. You've got to come to me. Now you decide to move. Your sword saved me. Thank you. Oh, will you stop moving, though? Oh, it's face. Oh, I've got sepsis. Am I dead? Am I alive? Am I underneath the brachiosaur? Am I alive? All right, you've asked for it now, son. Ah! Giving me sepsis. Oh, God, I might die now. Oh, my God. Just give me all the meat. All the meat. Woo.  Of course, another T-Rex. Like, my God. Does it ever end? That's like three T-Rexes I've killed and two Spinos. Come on, smooth man. Show me what you got. Oh, every time. Every time I talk to you. Are they all smooth now? Has it just went low poly for everybody? It has. Oh, he's got back up again. That's cheating. You can't do that.  I'll do it. That's not cool. That's really not cool. There we go. Yeah. Stay down this time. God, giving my Brachiosaurus his trouble. Oh, my God, I've got him. Although he's just floating there. Dude, there's a guy. Just want to be like, oh, let's stop. No, there's loads of things. There's a guy here. Are you rogue? Don't make me do this. He was being hostile. Oh, he's running now. He's got a spear. Oi! Where is he going? What secrets does he know? Like he runs like a T-Rex. Oh, he's also got a gas mask too. I can shoot you with a shotgun, you know.  And I don't want you to fall down there. So...  Where's the spear? We got a pipe. Black things now. What did he have? Oh, he had a flower for my sepsis. Oh, thanks, buddy. Oh, what's this? Breathing mask can't add gear is full. Ooh, I'll take the ammo as well. What does breathing mask do? Allows for faster stamina regeneration. Oh! Oh, that's perfect! Okay, now we're going to be enjoying this video, guys. Leave a like until next time. I'll see you later. Oh, bye-bye.


Thank you very much. Please. Thank you. Thank you very much.  Last Friday I came in here with a speech all prepared to talk to people on private initiatives and found out it was a surprise birthday party. Well, I'm delighted that all of you could be here today. I'll be off my limited schedule fairly soon, but in the meanwhile it's good to be with so many friends. I'm grateful for the many expressions of concern, but I'm doing fine thanks to some wonderful doctors. They're so skillful I'm thinking of having them work on the budget. I am completely recovered. In fact, the doctors told me this morning my blood pressure is down so low that I can start reading the newspapers and watching the TV news. But I'm also glad to have you here because I know each of you has struggled mightily to change America. Yet, even with our anxiousness to get on with the conservative agenda, it's sometimes important to recall how far we've come together. I always think back to the 60s and 70s and, well, even before then when our concern about federal spending and deficits fell on many a deaf ear here in Washington. And then when we started talking about tax cuts and tax limitation as well as lower marginal rates, official Washington was more amused than anything else. But today those ideas and concerns are the order of the day in the nation's capital and the results have added up to nothing less than an economic and social revolution. The rate of spending increase came down by whopping percentages, tax rates, and inflation declined. America created some 13 million more jobs, family income started to rise, and the poverty rate declined for two straight years. And when I compare where we were only a few years ago with what some of our critics are saying about these accomplishments, I have to tell you that some of them remind me of an agent that I heard about in my old career. It was back in those vaudeville days. People trying out for vaudeville would come in, empty theater, out on the stage, down there in front would be sitting a very cynical agent with a cigar usually in his mouth, and he'd say, okay, and they'd do their stuff. Well, this particular day a young fella came out, center stage, out came the cigar, he says, okay, what do you do, kid? And the young fella took off and flew around the ceiling of the theater, up over the balconies, and everything came down to a perfect landing. And the agent said, all right, what else do you do besides bird imitations? Well, whatever our critics say, I think all of us can be confident that the American people realize, just as I think someday historians will acknowledge, that moving back to concepts like limited government and the free market, as well as respect for the entrepreneur, created one of the most important social and economic revolutions in our history. Not only did we grow and prosper economically, but we renewed our political and social life as well. Government's inability to do anything about the burden that inflation and taxes were putting on our citizens was weakening public faith in our democratic institutions, a trend that today we have reversed. Or consider the social damage we were doing to the most basic unit of society, that engine of social progress, the family. For years, inflation and taxes robbed the family of more and more of its livelihood. An economic factor, of course, but as I say, a moral factor too. For governments said to young couples, we will tax you at higher rates for getting married. And in the years ahead, we'll turn the screw of bracket creep even tighter, and then we'll let inflation rob your savings and erode your personal exemption. In fact, in effect of posing a higher and higher tax on your children. Well, is it any wonder then that in this period, more and more of our young people postponed marriage, or didn't marry at all and postponed having children? But by bringing down tax rates, inflation and interest rates, by ending bracket creep, we've made family life safer and more secure. And we can be proud today that the downward trend of marriage, family formation, and childbearing appears to be arrested. The simple fact is, government had taken a stand against families. But thanks to your help and support, we're turning that around. We're putting government back on the side of families. There's been another important dimension to our economic recovery. We're helping the poor as never before. There is, for example, no cruel burden on the poverty stricken in the elderly than inflation. And by bringing inflation to a virtual standstill, we substantially increase the buying power of the poor families of America. So, too, our recent reform of the tax code will take millions of working poor people off the tax rolls entirely. Above all, we've built an economy that is creating millions of new jobs every year, providing growth and opportunity the poor need more than anyone. And that's why more than one half million people moved off the poverty rolls in 1985. This economic recovery and social and political renewal have made it possible to focus on some of our deeply ingrained problems like doing something about poverty. And it's here, I think, that we conservatives have an unrivaled opportunity in the years ahead, a cause that I believe we can make our own. You know, America's welfare system has been a long-standing concern with us.  When I don't get me wrong, those are worthy and important objectives. Protecting the taxpayer's investment in federal spending is a worthy objective, especially since we want our federal welfare spending to go to the people who really needed the poor themselves and not to people who already live comfortably. And all the economic progress that we've made, for example, has relied on trying to control federal spending. When we took office, huge federal programs with built-in yearly spending increases were just reaching maturation. So first we had to take steps to slow down the federal spending juggernaut. We cut the rate of spending increase, and then finally this year we're managing to get the federal government to actually spend less in real terms than it spent the year before. Talk about the earth shaking. But none of this would have been possible without the war on waste we began from our first day in office. Working with the Congress, we completely revitalized the Inspector General's program and saved the taxpayers untold billions. Last year, for instance, the Inspector General at Health and Human Services launched over 3,000 audits and investigations of fraud against the government that resulted in 1,000 convictions. The office's fraud and management recommendations will recoup more than $5.3 billion when fully implemented. So the war on waste and fraud has been an important part of our ability to bring down spending and ultimately to improve economic conditions for the poor. But I just think that waste and fraud isn't all we conservatives have to offer on the poverty problem, not by a long shot. Back in 1982, in a speech to Black political organization, I raised some of the questions discussed by the scholarly work of Charles Murray in the public interest. At the time, this wasn't exactly fashionable, but since then things have been changing. Slowly, a new bipartisan consensus on America's welfare system has developed, a consensus that holds what only a few could say a short time ago, that it is our welfare system that is one of the most serious obstacles to progress for the poor. The evidence is in and the history is clear. 20 years ago, with the best of intentions, the federal government began a program that it hoped would wipe out poverty in America. Today, the federal government and state governments with eight major welfare programs and more than 50 smaller ones spend more than $130 billion to pursue this objective. And now, with less than half of this money, we could give every poor man, woman, and child enough to lift them above the poverty line. But believe me, it isn't just the arithmetic that doesn't make sense. During the past few years, we've seen serious questions raised in scholarly works like Mr. Murray's book, Losing Ground, which showed poverty actually went up as the federal government spent more to eliminate it. The major network television specials featuring grim personal testimonials about the federal welfare system, and the issue here is really compassion. How compassionate is a welfare system that discourages families that are economically self-reliant, that takes 6,000 pages of federal regulations to explain, and is so complex it confuses and demoralizes the poor? How compassionate is a system that robs the poor of the tools to break the cycle of dependency? Well, the emerging consensus on welfare is finally agreeing with us that the federal welfare system has become a poverty trap, a trap that is wrecking havoc on the very support system the poor need most to lift themselves up and out of destitution, the family. This growing bipartisan consensus holds that our current welfare system is not only a failure, but counterproductive. The institutionalization of ghetto life, where as Bill Moyers put it in his special on this subject last year, mothers are children, fathers don't count, and the street is the strongest school. And I just think conservatives should have a special interest in this because, as I've mentioned, our original skepticism about the welfare system has been sadly borne out by recent research. But second, strengthening the family has been among our highest priorities and, believe me, no one needs that strength and help today more than America's poor. Let me pause here and cite as an example one disturbing problem we hear so much about—the homeless. Here in Washington there's a young Capuchin Franciscan priest named Father Jack Fawn Steele, who not only runs shelters for the homeless but has started a project called McKenna House, a kind of halfway house where the homeless are not just warehoused but given special counseling and training so that they might return to productive jobs and normal lives. And while the problems with the homeless are complex and deep going, when Father Fawn and Steele is pressed on the issue, he always remarks that at the root of these problems is a history of family breakdown and difficulty. So I just think the time is ripe for realizing our traditional concern with strengthening the family is directly related to this emerging national consensus on the welfare issue. I think conservatives and Republicans can now join with liberals and Democrats in re-appraising that entire system and examining the reason for its failure. There is common ground. We all know it isn't working. We know there will be no easy answer. It's the belief that there were easy answers that got us into the situation in the first place. We have to fight the impulse of many to believe that one policy change or reform written and implemented here in Washington can solve the problem of poverty and welfare dependency. We know from 20 years painful experience that it cannot. In seeking solutions, we as a nation need to draw up on the practical genius of the thousands of community leaders and individuals who deal with that problem every day. The federal government should retain its current financing role, but it cannot provide all the answers. We need to re-evaluate our entire anti-poverty strategy, a re-evaluation that will provide us with new approaches and initiatives, initiatives that will have as their goal the defense and strengthening of the family is the key to a strategic assault on poverty. And that's why last year I asked for a study of our welfare system. The recommendations of that study up from dependency are now being implemented. It's also why on Wednesday of this week I will have a chance both to hear about and describe some of the approaches we hope to take in getting what is essentially a research and development program off the ground. So too in my radio talk on Saturday, I mentioned that we have written to the governors of the 50 states and asked them here to the White House to be a part of this nationwide commitment to welfare reform. And today I just want to seek your active support to ask you to join together with many millions of other Americans in this critical domestic initiative. We know the answers are out there in our 50 states, in our cities and neighborhoods, and in the minds and hearts of the thousands of self-help leaders who are ready with hundreds of anti-poverty ideas if only our complex welfare system will allow them greater freedom to succeed. They can show us how to make work more rewarding than welfare, how to provide incentives for dignity instead of incentives for dependency. And I'm certain that we can, as a nation, move forward and together on this issue. I have said it great many times. Instead of sighting at the end of each year how many people were being maintained on welfare, if the program was really correct, every year they would be saying how many people we had been able to remove from welfare and restore it to a position of independence. Now all of us care about the poor. All of us want to see the tragedy that is poverty ended. So let's get to work. Now I realize there are going to be some crabbing and there are going to be some of the same kind of press that I've been getting kind of used to the last few weeks.   He was lying there seriously injured, even some of them permanent disabilities. And later followed the usual legal procedures with the insurance company and all and he was on the stand and a lawyer said to him, why are you lying there at the scene of the accident? Didn't someone come up to you and ask you how you were feeling and didn't you answer that you never felt better in your life? Well, he said, yes, I, yes, I remember that, that happening. Well, later on redirect another lawyer was asking the question and he said, what were the circumstances when you gave that answer as to how you felt? Well, he said I was lying there and he said a car came up and deputy sheriff got out. He said my horse was naing with pain and kicking at two broken legs. The deputy sheriff put the gun in his ear and, and put the horse out of his misery. He said my dog had a broken back and was whining with pain and he went over, did the same thing, put there and shot him and then he came over to me and said, now how are you feeling? So even though there may be some misguided criticism of what we're trying to do, I think we're on the wrong path and you know something else from dealing as a governor closer at hand with welfare and those people. I think truly that the bulk of the people on welfare aren't just lazy bums or cheaters. They want nothing more than to be independent, free of the social workers and out on their own once again. So we can help and do that. Thank you all. God bless you.