Gwyn fawr, dros gyda'r gaelig ysgol gyda'r Gaelig ydyn nhw ymgyrch. Yn ymweld yr Ysgol cyfreidio a'r Gaelig gyda'r parlymyn ysgol yma yn Edinburgh. Rwy'n dweud ymgyrch ar gyfer y parlymyn ysgol cyfreidio online ar www.scorcheparlymyn.tv ac hynny'n dweud yng Nghymru Cymru. Rwy'n eu cyfrifio am y deoedd, a mae ein bod nhw ymweld yr dweud. Fy roedd cei'r ddelch yn ddyf wedi bod yn cyflawn i gaelch yn yr ysgoleth y Prifysgol. Ru'n bwynt i gaelch yn John Scott! Fy roedd y dyfyniad i'r sydd yn gaelch yn yr ysgoleth. Fel ei ddifrwyddiol ysgoleth, mae'r drwsgrwm yn ddydd yn worlodd, os rydym ni wedi cymdeithasol yr ysgoleth sydd yn cyngorol i gaelch yn rhaid i hynny. The BTL op a debate won the event of the year at last week's Gallic awards in Glasgow. Congratulations to them. This year we saw 22 teams competing, representing 17 schools from throughout Scotland. The semi-finals were held last night in the Scottish storytelling centre here in Edinburgh, and what a challenge the judges have tonight. Getting through to tonight's final, please welcome our first team, Nicholson Institute C, Maddy MacLennan and Colm Nicholson. And from Dingwall Academy A, please welcome Ella Scar and Megan Dale. Congratulations to you all for reaching this stage. Now I would like to welcome all of you who are listening on Radio Nringale on radio, and also those present here tonight in the Scottish Parliament. And also I'd like to welcome our judges tonight. First of all next to me here is Maggie Cunningham. Maggie lives in Procton and she is chair of MG Al Ape. Maggie spent almost 20 years at the BBC, and many of those years were spent in upper management. Along with Maggie is Joe McDonald. Joe's been a judge here at the final a couple of times, and she also spent many years at the BBC, also in upper management in the garlic department. Beside them is Angus MacDonald. You will be familiar with Angus from his news presenting on BBC Al Ape, both on radio and television. If he's not to be found in the newsroom in Stornoway, you'll probably find him on his Croft and Swaddle in Point. So please welcome our judges. I'd also like to welcome and thank representatives from BT Scotland who are here tonight. They, along with many other groups, support the Gallic Schools debate. Also, thanks to Cunningham, and she are BBC Al Ape, MG Al Ape, Cwm yn y Gallic, Projektyn yn Yaldaen, Bordd yn y Gallic, and the MRG group. And finally tonight I'd like to welcome Iona MacRitchie, who is a senior producer at BBC Al Ape's news department. She has had a busy year being involved in broadcasting the referendum, and the debate is nothing new for Iona. She was in the team that won this in 1999. Please welcome Iona. That wasn't yesterday. And now some information about the rules of debate and the format of this evening. Each speaker from each team will have six minutes. First of all, the first speaker will speak for the argument four, and then there'll be a speaker against. The second speaker from each team will then have five minutes, and as usual, we'll be coming a close eye on the time. If you're running out of time, that is the noise you will hear. When you run out of time, this is the sound you'll hear. You'll be penalised if you run over and points will be taken away. Each team will then get five minutes to question the opposition with a bell to mark the end of that time. And one speaker from each team will then get between a minute and two minutes to round up. I think that's enough from me. We'll now start tonight's debate and our subject tonight. In the world of media, the gales have nothing to learn from the lowlanders. I'll say that again. In the world of media, the gales have nothing to learn from lowlanders. So we begin with the Nicholson Institute C, who are for this argument. Please welcome Maddy MacLennan. We want to be clear about the difference between the garlic world of media and the English world. In the last census, one out of one percent understand garlic. In the world of English, we have about 50 million speakers in this country. Garlic media gets 13 million. English media gets the billions. From that point of view, we do not see that the gales have anything to learn from the lowlanders. Before we look at gales and the lowlanders, we have to look at first of all what we mean by the word media. Now that means any way in which you communicate whether that be written, whether it be viewed or listened to. Now for this debate, we take media to mean radio, TV and newspaper. And when you think of English media, what do you think of? Arguments, hacking, arguments between commercial companies and sensationalism. And when you search the BBC and Google, it's scandals that appear. They have an insane amount of money and they will be taken to court if they do anything wrong. And these laws have had to be amended recently because of the carry-on that they've had. And that has affected the freedom that people have had to communicate publicly. And do you want the gales who are involved in media to be just like them? No, you don't. The lowlanders, they could learn a lot from the highlanders, from the gales. The gales are very creative with the funding that they receive. They create an awful lot with very small budgets. There are no other broadcasters in the United Kingdom which create as many programmes from as little funding. If you think about Machar o'r Gruhyswag o'r Y Orby o'r Bannan, the drama Bannan costs a fraction of what an English drama costs. The Gaelic programmes have to be as good or better than the English programmes. The BBC receives a fortune every year. The BBC in Wales receives over 100 million each year. You have to watch BBC all over for 15 minutes to be classified as a viewer of BBC all over. But in Wales you only have to watch for three minutes to be classified as a viewer. There are 10 times as many Welsh speakers as there are Gaelic speakers. So that means that there are more of them who watch their programmes. The second point. The Gaelic broadcasters have a particular responsibility to promote the language, something that lowlanders do not have. It's very difficult to judge the success of a minority language broadcaster by looking at the viewing figures. If they start to compare themselves to the English media, then it makes it very difficult when the promotion and the expansion of the language is vital. The Gaelic broadcasters don't see everything through commercialise. It is excellent that there is no advertising on BBC all over which break up the programmes. If you think if Coniach Mawr appeared in the middle of Bannant, trying to sell you a tin of links, or chassis lexie modelling spandex. Another important point. Gaelic broadcasters does not need a watershed either. The Gaelic broadcasters don't need or require misbehaviour or bad language to attract them to the TV programmes. They are attracted without these things. Do you think the Gaelic broadcasters would appreciate the likes of Russell Bran, Jonathan Ross, with their bad language? No they wouldn't. So it is the lowlanders that should learn from the Gaelic broadcasters. Now if you think about the Gaelic broadcasters who have reached the higher levels in broadcasting Finlay J and Alec MacDonald. Now I've mentioned TV and radio, but Callum will talk about the newspaper. The English media, as the phrase it here, Norman McLeod on STV, and Tony Kearney they are representing programmes in English. Look at how the lowlanders want to listen to the Gales, but you don't see it the other way round. These are Gales who have abilities as good or better than the lowlanders. Callum will follow that up. Thank you. Sorry I can't quite hear you properly because I meant to have a feed, but I'm just going to have the door open. Thank you very much Maddy McLeod on there. And against the motion from Dingwall Academy A, please welcome Elascar. Thank you for everybody. Thank you for everybody assisting me last night and the medical assistant I got from Google. I'm okay now and hopefully I'll get through the next six minutes. Ladies and gentlemen, the Gales haven't been far behind the lowlanders in the last few years, but it's clear now that they are well behind. We have had newspapers in Gaelic in the past. We've had them since the 19th century, but we do not have a newspaper now anymore. Now, even though we were here two years ago, talking about the day of the newspaper being over, they are the foundation upon which media has been built. We used to have the Gaelur newspaper, but unfortunately the Gaelur is no longer, but we shouldn't be disappointed about that. Just this Monday a new newspaper was released the national. The Gael should learn from this. Who knows that we might have a new Gaelur very soon. The new Gaelic channel, BBCYllab, was established in 2008, and what confidence it gave us that we were deserving of our own channel. Before that, we only had a very small number of programmes on TV quite often in the small Irish. No wonder Gaelic was reducing. People didn't have the skills that they needed. We now have the channel, we're delighted with that. But if it wasn't for the lowlanders, for those in the BBC in particular, and the abilities that they have, we wouldn't be able to run the channel. It is the skills and the abilities of the lowlanders that allow us to run BBCYllab and Radio Nangale. It's an excellent thing that we get support for the Gaelic. I'm delighted to say, though, that we are seeing more and more highland names appearing in the credits at the end of programmes. This is showing progress in terms of the skills and experience that Gaelas have with support from the lowlanders. We should all learn from one another. A word now about the types of programmes that are to be seen on BBCYllab. There's a wide range of programmes available between drama, educational programmes, children's programmes, documentary, arts, sports. It's the mix of programmes that we would expect from the channel. Looking at the programmes that others have produced over the years, it is reasonable to think that Gaelas would follow the format that other channels have had previously. We learned from the lowlanders like that. But we only get six or seven hours each day. We should learn from the lowlanders and broadcast programmes throughout the day. The documentary on BBCYllab are enjoyable in social studies, geography and history. They're very useful. But many of these programmes are bought in from other channels elsewhere like National Geographic. And then they're dubbed into Gaelic. So BBCYllab wouldn't be able to show us these interesting programmes if it wasn't for the non-gales creating them. But it is a new channel and there are more and more Gaelic programmes. And the more programmes that are appearing with Gaelas and them show us that we are learning new skills and experience from the non-gales. Drama might be one of the biggest holes that there has been. Everybody enjoys drama. Who doesn't watch East Enders or Cornish Street? We used to have Machar years ago and everybody enjoyed it. But the thing is the writers were writing in English to begin with and then were translated into Gaelic. There were non-gales who were behind it to begin with. They didn't have any Gaelic. The writers were non-gales as well and when the gales started writing it the viewing numbers dropped so it was the non-gales that were making it good. So finally now we have a drama BBCYllab at Bannon and we really enjoyed seeing us in Gaelic and the technical team and the writing team were all gales and that shows that we've learned from a lot since the time of Machar. But interestingly enough it's a production team that produced in between us that created this programme so it's the non-gales again who are showing us how to do it. So we've learned a lot from the non-gales. There are lots of repeats though on BBCYllab. But before I leave it's good to learn from others. That's my main point. Thank you. Elasgar there. And now our second speaker from each team and they have five minutes each. So for the argument first of all from Nicholson Institute C please welcome Colin Nicholson. Friends, as you heard from Maddy we are for the argument that the gales have nothing to learn from the non-gales in the world of media. It's impossible to imagine that the other team could even think about saying that the gales could learn anything from the non-gales. As Maddy has already shown you there is no section of media where where Gaelic gets more money than the English. The recommendation that we would have is when are the gales going to show the non-gales how they should be running media. There's no doubt that the gales have made a lot of progress in the world of media. All you have to do is listen to the radio, TV or any newspaper and you'll see how gales have impacted elsewhere. Look at BBCYllab by and how much they create and do for Gaelic as Maddy has shown us. If you look at BBCYllab in Gael in 2010 they won the radio station of the year against other stations such as Radio Scotland, Radio 2 and Radio Wales. People had to strive for years to reach where we are today in Gaelic media. We had to show that we are better than the non-gales and gales today are running the BBC in Scotland like Donald MacKinnon, Ken Macquarie. Now that is progress for you and it proves that the gales if we are given the opportunity we are as good and in many ways better than the non-gales. Mally spoke about TV and radio but there are gales also at high level in newspapers. We look at Torcal Crichton from the All of Lewis. He started at the West Highland Free Press and he is now an editor at the Daily Record based in London. A couple of months ago Angus MacLeod passed away and he had been raised in Plastafell outside Stornow and he was the Scottish editor of The Times. So there are two examples of two normal gales who reached a very high level. Doctor Who is seen as one of the prime programmes on the BBC. Douglas MacKinnon, I think from the Isle of Skye. So the non-gales now take the talent from the Gaelic world to supplement the English world. This is proof once again that there is nothing for the gales to learn from the non-gales. Now we are talking about Tele. What about the programme Yorpe? It is the only programme that looks at Europe that is available in anywhere in Britain. That programme has been running for over 20 years now, winning national and international awards, proving that it is a special programme. Again, gales ahead of everyone else and producing programmes that are unavailable in any other language in this country. There are plenty stars from that programme from the Highlands who started off in Gaelic. We have Michael Bachanan, who is at a high level in the BBC. There is not that long since he was working in the BBC World Service. Also, you have the likes of Julie Fowless on North Eust, who was singing in Gaelic on the film Brave. She is now proving herself at the level of Hollywood, and she has just been awarded to her services for services Scottish Music, the first gale to receive such an award. If you compare her to the stars that the non-gales have, Rupert Murdoch, Rebecca Brooks, Piers Morgan and Russell Brand, they have brought a bad name to the industry. They don't care about the impact they have on people. Friends, what on earth do the gales have to learn from the non-gales? Not a thing. Thank you. Thank you very much, Colin Nicholson there. The final argument from Dingwall Academy A, please welcome Megan Dale, chair, ladies and gentlemen. Ella started her discussion looking at the history of gaelic media. I started thinking that the gael has been like many other newspapers and fell away, but we are falling behind now with gaelic media and media has changed a lot. At one time, TV was a new exciting thing, but now it is the internet and social media, which have priority. Social media gives gales the opportunity to broadcast themselves and promote gaelic, and we should be taking these opportunities and taking advantage of these networks that have been created. A few years ago, they tried to produce mygaelic.com for gales. That was thousands of pounds that were spent on that years ago, but nobody wanted to use it because we had Twitter, Facebook and MySpace, and we used that. People were just writing in gaelic and broadcasting there, but today we see more and more gaelic appearing online on Facebook and on Twitter. There are groups on Facebook that broadcast a lot, and we are thankful for the people who created these networks for us, and we see how other minority languages use these international networks. That shows that we are learning from the non-gales, and that is a good thing. As part of the social media week that happened two years ago, gales debated where gaelic stood in social media, and a question was asked should apps and programmes in gaelic be created and they were unanimous that it was better to use existing networks like Facebook and Twitter instead of creating a new network. That shows again that we are learning from the non-gales. It's no good to create a box for ourselves that's just got gales in it. We have to bring people in from numerous places and show them the skills that we have and the things that already work. In the 19th century Karl Marx said that workers should take the opportunities that they had. We are now suggesting that minority languages keep an eye on what is happening throughout the world and take control of the means of communication. One way of doing that and a way that's been done effectively in the UK and in other countries is crowdfunding. That means that people are creating newspapers or digital channels with money and funding coming from the people who are going to be using it. Wingsoverscotland.com is an example. A website that was promoting the yes side and the referendum. That website now attracts a lot of people. Gales can learn from that and look at getting funding for a YouTube channel or something like that. That will be a good thing. It's a lot easier to do something like crowdfunding because it gives people the opportunity to control their broadcasting. Something else that we have seen is that the BBC controls the media. That's a good thing. That the BBC controls the voice of the gales too much. BBC Allop and Radio Nangale. That may restrict the output that we hear. We should use social media and look at international examples. This will help a lot on how gales are seen internationally. We can also look at what the... It's not good to put people in a box of gale or non-gale. If we've only got 60,000 people to speak gaelic, we have to look out with third box not just within this box. There's nothing that we will learn from the non-gales. Thank you. Thank you, Megan Dale. Now is the opportunity to question each other and to remind you of tonight's subject. In the world of media, the gales have nothing to learn from the lowlanders or the non-gales. First of all, for this, the Nicholson C. You said that BBC Allop isn't broadcast through it today. But if you had the budget that BBC Allop has, if you gave another channel that budget, £13.8 million, what kind of programmes would you then get from that? If you're talking about money, why not look at the crowdfunding that we were talking about and then create more programmes? They don't have enough just now. But do you think about the budget they've got? You can't do that much with such a small budget. You were saying that there weren't enough programmes to be broadcast all day, but how are they going to do that with such a small budget? If you look at these tenders, which spends £30 million a year, what we're saying is that they should use things like crowdfunding and social media to attract more funding. Why aren't the gales using that? And when the programmes are more successful, that attracts more funding. And that's how it works. Because if they're not successful, then they don't attract any funding they stop. Wasn't Bannon successful? And Yorby? That's one national and international awards. But there still aren't enough people watching it. I had a tape of... I recorded Gerhuzd Y Orchard and I wasted a run-out watching it every day. That may be the case, but still not enough people are watching. Yes, 500,000 people are watching it. But not every programme in garlic media is like that. You need more funding. You need more funding so that you have more successful programmes. And remember, lots of these programmes. Remember a lot of these programmes on BBC All Up have been bought in from elsewhere. English programmes do that as well. If you think about friends, how I met your mother, all these programmes are bought in. What's this... Doesn't that happen everywhere? But the gales buy in from the non-gales and learn from the non-gales. You want to be on the side of the non-gales. Do you think these watersheds are a good thing then? We didn't say we're on the side of the non-gales. We're just saying it's a good thing that we learn from them. Why is it good then to learn from people who use bad language after the watershed? The gales don't have to learn everything that the non-gales use. But maybe just the parts that make their programmes so successful. Who watches television at 5 o'clock instead of 10 o'clock? Most people watch about 9, 10 o'clock. And that has went bad language. It was on TV. The only bad language you get in Gaelig is when Dan Murray talks to Cwnywch Mor. Not every programme has bad language. That's not how it is at all. There are programmes which are fine. Wouldn't it be more effective for us to learn from people like TGK here in Ireland who are developing their own channel with their own minority language instead of learning from the lowlanders? We've been to Conymara to their studios there. A small budget like we have. Shouldn't we learn from people like that? Well, why not learn from the non-gales, the lowlanders as well? But they have billions of pounds. The BBC has a massive budget. Look at David Attenborough when he goes off to Africa. Australia the next day. Bebes Yalabu doesn't have budgets like that. Shouldn't we learn from people who have similar experience to ourselves? What's your time run out for the Nicholson there? And the opportunity now for Dengel Academy A. We found five programmes on Sylge on Bebes Yalabu. When we read about them, they were international. That they were international programmes translated into Gaelic. And Bebes Yalabu, they are trying to work with a budget that they have. If they had more, they could create more of their own programmes. And like I said, the non-gales do that as well. They buy programmes in other countries. If they had a bigger budget, they'd be better. But if they use things like social media, but social media is good for things like crowdfunding, gales have to help themselves. Now you've said that you don't receive enough funding and it's good that we don't have advertising, but advertising brings in money. So why not have more advertising and then bring in more funding? There you go. As I said, if you want to see Shelly Lexi in Spandex, but as I said, that gives you time to go make a cup of tea. You don't have to watch them. It gives you more money and then you're able to create better programmes. With the skills and technology of the non-gales, how could the gales survive? Are you saying that the gales aren't capable enough to run their own technology? We're saying that the non-gales technology is working and we use what they've given us. Now you've said that they've got more money, they've got better technology. Then why don't we learn how to make better programmes from them and then get more funding? Anybody who works in media knows how to do their own job. People in Bebe's Helipa know just as well how to work a camera as those who are down in London. I know if you want to get training from the BBC, you get the same training, you get your training centrally and then we'll go to Bebe's Helipa maybe. You were talking about doing between us, isn't he best in sky? But he has come from the non-gale world. Do you not think that it's better to learn from the non-gales and to copy them and create more programmes? Do you not think that everybody should help each other? We can look at how successful non-gale media has been and attract that into our own world. That isn't saying that that Gallup broadcasting is bad, but we're saying that it'll be better if we learn from others. We think, as we said, that it'll be better to maybe learn from somebody like TGK here in Ireland. They have a budget similar to us and they have a minority language like us. Look at the attraction in BBC Gallup and the programmes are shown and they attract people up to the Highlands and Islands. Out of the 500,000 who watch BBC Gallup each week, nine out of ten don't have Gallup. BBC Gallup is excellent at attracting non-gales into watching, but you're still buying programmes from the non-gales and you're learning these skills from the non-gales and that improves the channel. Does that not improve the channel? Do you agree? No. Thank you very much. It is now time for our closing arguments. A speaker from each team will have between one and two minutes to do so. First of all, for the argument, Maddie MacLennan from the Nicholson Institute, see you. As we discussed there, you said that it was the technology of the non-gales that leaves BBC Gallup being so successful. Are you trying to say that there are no gales that could do that? I don't really understand technology myself, but I don't represent everybody in the Highlands. You've also said that BBC Gallup doesn't have enough programmes, but the budget means that they have to work within those restrictions. With the budget that they've got, they're doing fantastically well and they attract a wide variety of people. 90% of the viewers don't have garlic, so 90% of 500,000 watch have no garlic. But these statistics are important and they prove our argument that with a budget so small they've done so well. You've also said that the gales are falling behind, but we have proven that the garlic media is excelling. We don't have to learn anything from the non-gales, but we now attract the non-gales into our culture and language. Bit by bit, the gales are doing what they struggle to do with the claymore and that is to have peace with the non-gales. Thank you, Maddie. Against the argument from Dingwell Academy, Megan Dale, think about BBC Gallup and the programmes that are coming from the non-gales like the Gruffle One Walls and Grumit. We've spoken about advertising. We're fortunate that we have advertising in the lowland telly, but these adverts bring in so much money. If you want more money, you have to accept advertising. While I'm talking about money, if they want more money, why not look at crowdfunding, as I explained? That will be gales funding the gales and nobody would then complain about garlic getting too much money. As Ella told you, it was non-gales that wrote machar, but when they left, the programme wasn't as successful. We've spoken about how gales have reached high levels in the BBC, but that is within a non-gale system. It's silly to say that there's nothing we can learn from the non-gales in media. Why else do we learn? We go to school to learn, and we don't say, oh, I've learnt enough, I don't need to learn any more. We always need to learn more, and it will help us. We only have 60,000 garlic speakers, so we need support. It's dangerous to put ourselves in this box with a label on it. We have an awful lot to learn from the non-gales. We're always learning, and we'll continue to learn, but that's not bad. Thank you. Thank you, Megan Dale. That is the debate over, and congratulations on you all. You now have the chance to take a breather. I'm going to ask the judges to leave the room to make their decisions. While Maggie, Joe and Angus leave, we will listen to some of the debates from last night that were held in the semi-finals that were held in the Scottish Storytelling Centre.  In the second debate, James Gillespie High School were against Dingwall Academy A, and their argument was that it's a good thing that the internet gives us freedom to debate with each other, and here is how they got on, and I'm not going to translate this, but apologies for the delay in returning to us while we were listening to the semi-finals there, but now we're back at the final of the BT All-Up debate coming to you live from the Scottish Parliament. I'd like to welcome Liz Turner, who is here representing BBC BT Scotland, and I'm delighted to say that our judges are back. I'm now going to ask Angus MacDonald to take us through to the prizes. Thank you Alistair, and thank you to the Scottish Parliament as well for their welcome here tonight. We've enjoyed the evening here. We've listened to a great debate with a very strong, very strong debate, well researched, very well informed. They went international in the examples that they gave us. And in both teams, each speaker raised points from the other side, and they gave us some interesting examples. And you would also recognise that they believed in their arguments, or at least they convinced us that they believed in their arguments. I think that was very important as well. The closing statements were very strong, but when it came down to the ones and twos, it was in the questioning that we made, and one team was stronger. In asking the questions, they were asking very difficult questions, and they were sticking to them, and the other team were maybe not answering the questions that were asked. It wasn't an easy decision, but in the end we decided that Dingwall Academy have won this year. Liz Turner from BT Scotland is handing over the prize just now. I also have to say that we have been debating the speaker of the year, and throughout the whole competition from the first round, we decided that Megan Dale is the speaker of the year, and she gets the BBC's shield to the best speaker of the year. And now to hand over the BBC's shield to the best speaker. Please welcome Eona McCritchie. Thank you Alistair. You'll be delighted to hear that I've been on the phone to Ofcom, and we haven't broken any watershed rules by discussing Jesse Lexie and Spandex, so you're okay, you're off the hook with that. I'm delighted to be here tonight to award this prize to Megan. I've enjoyed the evening and I enjoyed the debate as well. I have quite a strong connection with this building. I've been working here for the past year as a political correspondent, and I'd like to say that every debate I listened to was as lively and as interesting as tonight's debate. Well, I'll say it was anyway. I've also got quite a strong tie with this debate. Now, as Alistair said, we won this in... He said 1992, it was actually 1999. I won the prize, not with my own school, but when somebody from the Nicholson got sick on the day of the final, I had to stand in, and we won as part of the Nicholson Institute team. It's such a long time ago. We heard a lot about the internet, but we didn't even have the internet back then, so we had to go to the library and go through the microfilms to look at the newspaper. I don't know if it's easier today, but the research is a little bit easier, definitely. But I remember how nervous I was that day, standing and talking. So congratulations to both teams. And I think Alistair should just watch out, or somebody here might be stealing our jobs in a few years. It was a very good subject, and on behalf of the BBC, congratulations to Megan. Congratulations on your victory. Congratulations, Megan, and congratulations, Dingwall Academy. Thank you very much to all the teams that took part in this year's competition. Thank you to our judges who were present tonight, to BT Scotland, those who are here present in the Scottish Parliament, and also those of you who are listening to us on Radio Nangale. From myself and everybody here, good night.


Gogomani reveals she needs blood and pubic hair before loaning money. Well-known Sangoma Gogomani recently revealed on her Instagram that she's tired of people not paying her back and will in the future ask for blood and hair before loaning anyone money. The reality TV star and Sangoma Gogomani added that the same people that desperately need a loan in December will ignore her in January when they have to pay back the loan. So she now wants a couple of drops of blood, pubic hair, and a piece of hair before she borrows money. You have the nerve. We work the whole year, then comes December and you come and borrow money. A person who comes to borrow money must first gimme their hair, their pubic hair, the dirt of their tongue, and a few drops of blood. I'm getting tired of people not returning the money. You borrow money and don't return it. In the video, she assures her customers that if they give her what she wants, she will borrow her money. The businesswoman Gogomani, real name Lee N. Makopo previously revealed that she and her husband Sibel Omgyu have a contract that states he will be turned into a Tokoloshi if he dies first and that she will be turned into a Umkawau, Tokoloshi, if she dies first. We cannot let our children suffer because one of us died. We have to return to the living. F5 News reports that Mani has earned a reputation for being a fearless and outspoken Sangoma in the public domain.


Welcome to All Hands Update, here's what's happening around your Navy. A Guam-based MH-60S Nighthawk helicopter assisted in the recovery of distressed personnel in the Mariana Islands. The helicopter responded to an emergency call received by U.S. Coast Guard Sector Guam. The crew spotted the capsized vessel and marked the position overhead, allowing a rescue boat to take the personnel to safety. USS Harry S. Truman reached another milestone in its deployment, launching its 2,000th aircraft mission in support of Operation Inherent Resolve. This impressive benchmark comes less than six months after Truman's first sortie launched on December 28th. E7 quotas are out, over 3,000 new chiefs will put on anchors this cycle. To view the quotas, visit ah.mil. You can read more about what's happening around your Navy at Navy.mil.


Hi, Jeff Rick here on the ground at the Sheridan Palace in San Francisco. We're at the BrightEdge Share 14 conference coming out learning the latest about content marketing and also SEO. I'm joined here by Kevin Hill, VP Marketing and Technology for Enviro Safety. So welcome. Thanks for stopping by. Absolutely. Fantastic to be here. I really appreciate it. It's exciting to see this. And after four years of seeing the conferences and stuff, seeing it grow like this is just exciting. And Jim's presentation that he did, there's four or five new things he's rolling out. I just get tingles up my spine. He was jumping off the stage. The guy was fired up. Push the button. So tell us a little bit about Enviro Services. People don't know the company. Yes.  We sell across the world. So companies like Samaritan's Purse, who's treating people in the Ebola virus outbreak in Africa, we sell to them and help them out, help them protect people's lives. So that's kind of what we do. We make it safe to be in the work environment for medical professionals, for industrial professionals, oil and gas industry, things like that. And how long has the company been around? Been around for about 10 years. 10 years. Yep.  So talk a little bit about the online division and how that's growing. Sure. So our online division, I was brought on board about two and a half years ago. The company was looking for someone who could lead their charge with the online marketing. And we've grown from myself to about eight people now. We should be about 10 people in the next couple of months. And we use Bright Edge a lot to track where we've been, where we're going and what we need to do. I use it a lot for delegating assignments to people throughout the company, updating titles, updating things like that, and tracking some of the trends that are going on with the SEO marketing that we do. So talk a little bit about the difference between classic SEO marketing looking for words versus kind of the content marketing, which is really what the guys here are talking about, especially in the context now that you guys are right in the middle of one of the biggest news stories that's going on with unfortunately the Ebola virus. How is that kind of changing your go to market and how you use the tool? So one of the big pushes that Bright Edge was on the front edge of was talking about the very secure keyword search. And they were very prescient in looking at it and saying, look, keywords are going to go away. And they kind of have. 60%, 70% of our keywords are not provided, which drives this market is crazy. And they took that and said, look, we're going to look at this and go to the page marketing and look at page content as opposed to just keywords. Key, key move that they pioneered what two years ago. So wait, let's dig into that a little bit more. So what you're saying is that before it was really kind of index and keyword driven. Absolutely. Now it's really driving off of the page. Right. So how does that change your strategy as a marketer? So looking at it, you can't really go in and get the keywords, right? What keywords are we going to market for? You can in some ways. But you go in and look at the pages and start saying, okay, how much traffic is this page driving? How much revenue is this page driving? And Bright Edge takes instead of me having to go through spreadsheets like Excel spreadsheets and go to Google and go to Webmaster Tools and things like that. I can go to Bright Edge and click a button and there's my information. So I don't have to spend all that time doing the mechanics of discovering the data. Bright Edge pulls it in for me and saves me that time so I can concentrate on what I'm doing, which is actually garnering traffic for a website. And I wonder if you can share any specific stories of where you found something that you didn't expect and were able to take action on it or maybe you thought you had a good rider and nobody ever reads his stuff. So I wonder if you could share some, you know, kind of actionable stuff you're able to do to really drive your business. Absolutely. So we just relaunched our website. We went to a completely new platform and everybody knows that's going to be some experience and some scary times sometimes. And in relaunching our platform, Bright Edge does their updates and we watched Bright Edge, you know, like a hawk and we found some keywords that we hadn't realized were really driving a ton of traffic for us and all of a sudden we saw this big drop off. We went into Bright Edge started drilling down in where, you know, where we were hit and we found a couple of pages that we'd actually left off of the transition. So whereas before, we would have maybe caught it a month later with Bright Edge, you know, a week later, we saw this drop off and immediately jumped on it. We're able to bring that content back, pages, put it back and recover. Because it turned out those are really important pages. It turned out they were really important pages. Awesome. So talk a little bit about the growth of the company, the growth of this conference. You said you've been coming for four years. Yeah. How has things evolved in that time and what are you excited about going forward?  They're constantly watching the space. They're listening to the customers. They're actively calling them and finding out what are your points of pain, you know, what's causing you to spend a lot of time doing things other than SEO.  These are the new things we're rolling out.  And I know that other people I talk to the conference in the same pain points. And he's just driving to address those things. And the data pool that he has lets him see trends like, for instance, you know, going from keyword marketing to page marketing, things like that. So those are the things that are exciting to me is watching this company innovate and be on the forefront as opposed to kind of reacting. Right, good. Well, Kevin, thanks for stopping by, providing a little insight. We always like to talk to customers, practitioners, people out doing it. Jeff Frick here on the ground at Sheridan Powell San Francisco at the Bright Edge Shear 14. Keep watching on SiliconANGLE.TV.


Greetings and welcome to the Introduction to Astronomy. In this video, we are going to discuss the two types of planets that exist in our solar system. We will see that our solar system is divided into two very distinct types of planets, and while each planet has its own distinct properties, we can easily group them together as there are two sets that easily have a lot of things in common. So let's take a look at those here, and the first set is the terrestrial planets. These are the planets that are a lot like the Earth, and therefore we call them terrestrial, and that includes Mercury, Venus, the Earth itself, and Mars. So these four are what we call the terrestrial planets. They are all very close to the Sun, and these are the first four planets, and they're all very rocky worlds. They're all things that we could actually land on. And in fact, we have had soft landings right now on three of these planets. We have had soft landings on Venus. We've brought astronauts back to the Earth, so we've soft landed there, and we've had soft landings on Mars. The only one that has not yet been landed on, at least as a soft landing, would be Mercury. Mercury has only been visited by a couple of spacecraft so far. Now the other type of planet is what we call a Jovian planet, or Jupiter-like planet. And that includes Jupiter itself as the prototype of these Saturn, Uranus, here, and Neptune. So this includes the Jovian planets. These are all very gaseous, and they are ones that we have never landed on, and will never land on, because there is no solid surface on which to land. Now if we want to look in a little more details, we can look at a little table here showing some of their properties and comparing these two different types of planets. So what we see here is that the terrestrial planets have one set of properties, and the Jovian planets have a completely different set of properties. So we'll note that the terrestrial planets are small in size and mass, whereas the Jovian planets are large. We can note that the terrestrial planets have rocky surfaces, and the Jovian planets are all gaseous. And related to that we have solid surfaces for the terrestrial planets, and no solid surface for any of the Jovian planets. All of the terrestrial planets are high density, all of the Jovian planets are lower density. All of the terrestrial planets have a slow rotation, while all of the Jovian planets have a faster rotation. So even the fastest rotating terrestrial planet, the Earth, rotates slower than the slowest rotating of the Jovian planets. When we look at magnetic fields, the terrestrial planets have weak or no magnetic fields, while all the Jovian planets have strong magnetic fields. When we look at satellites, we see lots of satellites in the outer solar system around the Jovian planets, very few in the inner solar system. And we also note that there are no rings in the inner solar system among the terrestrial planets, while every single one of the Jovian planets has a ring. And then finally, we also note that the terrestrial planets are all close to the Sun, while the Jovian planets are all far away from the Sun. Now, what might cause us to have these two different types of planets? And we believe it has to do with how they have formed and where they formed in the solar system. So if we look at this, when you're close to the Sun, you would have a higher temperature. So it would be much hotter. So as the solar system was forming, you had higher temperatures close to the Sun, colder temperatures further away, and that meant that different types of materials could condense. Close to the Sun, the only things that could actually form solids were rocks and metals. So the terrestrial planets close to the Sun could only form from rock and metal. So we see them with high density materials, rocky materials, metallic materials, very little ices or gases. So while we consider the Earth has an atmosphere and the Earth has a lot of water and ice on it, it's a very small percentage of the overall composition of the Earth. So this would give us terrestrial or Earth-like planets made primarily of rock and metal. When you're far from the Sun, past what we'd call the frost line, where ices could condense, then we'd have ices as well, and ices mean things like water, H2O, but it could also mean things like methane and ammonia. So we can have various different... When we say ice, we're not referring just to water ice, which it might be the first thing you think of, but we can get other compounds as ices as well. These could form as well, and these are much more common in the solar nebula than rocks or metals. So there was a lot more material to build from, and that allowed larger planets to be able to form. So why are large planets in the outer solar system? They had a bigger base of materials from which to build. They certainly could form rocks and metals as well. Those could condense in the outer solar system, but in addition, you could get things like water and methane and ammonia that allowed you to build up much larger planets, and if they got large enough, they would then be able to directly pull in things like hydrogen and helium gas which made up the vast majority of the solar nebula, and that allowed the outer planets, the Jovian planets, to become much larger. Now, how do planets change over time? As we take a look here, planets will change as they form, and we have a little picture of the Earth here. The Earth has a core here. It has a liquid outer core, a solid inner core. This whole section here would be iron, iron and nickel. So primarily iron, also nickel as well, so it would be very metallic, a metallic core that would be present there. The outer layers, the mantle in the outer layers here would then be rocky, primarily made up of silicate rocks, so rocky material, and the outer layers are the least dense materials, things like waters, ices and gases, and that would be the surface, the crust of the Earth, in addition to its atmosphere. So the planets, when they form, if they form large enough, they actually undergo a process called differentiation, and what that is is a separation of materials by density. What that means is that the Earth was at one point molten. The entire Earth would have been molten, and that meant that the denser materials were able to sink down to the core, and the less dense materials rose to the surface. So it gave us Earth with a metallic core, with the densest materials all down at the center, a rocky mantle in crust, with higher density rocks down in the mantle, lower density rocks up here on the crust, and then a lowest density or gaseous atmosphere. So the planets would have undergone this very, very early in their formation, they would have been molten, and they would have separated out by density, just as anything else, anything here, if you take several liquids together, water and oil, they will also separate by density with the less dense material rising to the top and the denser material sinking down below. Now, other things that can change a planet's surface include geological activity. If you have a planet with a hot interior that has internal heat, then you can get geological activity, and we get that here on Earth in terms of plate motions, in terms of volcanic activity, in terms of earthquakes, and various other geological types of activity, and those will reshape the surface of the Earth. So any objects that are there now could disappear, for example, craters that form or other land features could be wiped out by volcanic eruptions, and that's a constant state of change that occurs not only on planets, but also on many of the moons that we will look at. Now, the other thing that can shape the surface of a planet is impacts. Impacts can change the surface appearance of a planet, and they can give us objects that are heavily cratered like the moon, and objects that are less cratered like the Earth. The number of craters doesn't tell us that one object has been hit more than the other. In fact, the Earth and the moon have probably suffered about equal numbers of impacts over the billions of years of the solar system. However, the Earth has this geological activity or weathering effects that wear down the craters. So in reality, the number of craters tells us something about how old the surface is, not how often something has been impacted. And we will see that as we look at other objects elsewhere in the solar system. Impacts can also change the entire planet. Large, massive impacts can essentially shatter a large object, and maybe the reason we actually have a large moon is because of a massive impact billions of years ago. So let's finish up here with our summary, which says that we talk about two distinct types of planets, and those are the terrestrial planets, the Earth-like planets, and the Jovian planets, or Jupiter-like planets. They formed in different regions of the solar system because of different temperatures. So rocky and metallic planets formed close to the sun and gave us the terrestrial planets. The gaseous and icy planets formed further away, and that's where it was a lot colder. And solar system surfaces have been modified over times by various processes, cratering geological activity, just among a couple of them that we have discussed. So that concludes our lecture on the two different types of planets. We'll be back again next time for another topic in astronomy. So until then, have a great day, everyone, and I will see you in class.


of the Jackie Boswell show. I'm Joe Wamba, joined now with Jackie Boswell, head coach of the women's basketball team. And coach, first, let's talk about congratulations in order. Sarah Tarber, being player of the year. Johnny A. Curry, honorable mention, all conference. What are those players' performances? I mean, we've seen them all year. What does that do in terms of the conference taking notice? Well, I think that that's great. And we really appreciate the conference thinking so highly of them. Because I think they're among some really, really good talent across our conference. And there were a lot of good options for all of those. And you can argue a lot of different things. But really happy for them. And just appreciate what our conference is saying about us. And now as we move into what's going to happen this week is ECAC's the opportunity to defend the, you know, because we're the South Region champion last year. This year's format's a little bit different, but still, we can call it the defend of the title. What are you guys looking forward into this game with Cabrini tomorrow? Well, you know, we're excited. The ECAC's gives you a great opportunity to still get some post-season play and some experience for our younger kids. And it also allows our seniors to not have to end the way that it did last week. And I think we just have to try to take advantage of that. I feel like our teams in the past have definitely done that. Like you said, last year, us being able to go all the way on the road. You know, so we're pretty excited about that. And it gives us also a great opportunity to play some different teams. So, you know, looking forward to playing in Cabrini out of a different conference tomorrow night. And it's always fun just to try to get prepared for everything. Talking about that preparation, you guys have found out about 4 o'clock yesterday. Have you had time to prepare? Well, you know, I had to bribe my coaching staff with dinner last night to stay around and help me with the film. But you know, we stayed up most of the night. And now I think we're ready. We have our scouting report. And at this point, I think we just got to really focus on the things that we do well. And hopefully that will make us successful. And that's what postseason play brings to you is you're going to have a quick turnaround.  You guys have played three game weekends. If you guys get to the championship, it's going to be a three game weekend at Carnegie Mellon. What are those weekends that you've had do to you to prepare for this week?   And you know, you look back on those days and on those times and how exhausted you were. But this should be exciting. It shouldn't be exhausting. It should be really exciting. And because this is it at this point, you know, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. And we hope that the light is really bright by Sunday. Well, good. I know you've had very little time to prepare for the game, as you mentioned. And you guys talked about what you can do to play your game. What do you need to defend against Cabrini's game to get that W you're looking for tomorrow night at Owings Mills Gymnasium? Well, you know, what we saw in film, they got a couple shooters that they can really shoot the ball. And they have a post player who's a senior who, you know, is helping their team. And they have five players that score in double digits. So, you know, they have some pretty well-balanced scoring. So I think it's going to take a great defensive effort on our part to be successful. You guys have shown great defensive efforts in all the conference games this year. So you guys are no foreigner to play in great defense. Right.  And it gives us a little bit of advantage as well. Well, Coach, we wish you the best of luck. And hopefully we're defending a title throughout the weekend. Sounds good. Great. Thank you. She's Jackie Boswell. I'm Joe Wamba. This has been the Jackie Boswell Show.


Hello and thanks for tuning into the STM32WB Getting Started series. My name is Colin Ramraten, MCU and MPU product marketing in the Americas region. Our FAE team has brought you these videos to help you develop and start with the STM32WB. All you need is an STM32WB nuclear board that I'm showing here, and you can jump into all the fun and start developing with the STM32WB for your application. Let's have a look at the 7 key points that make the STM32WB a unique Bluetooth offering. The STM32WB supports multiple protocols. This means software and hardware support for Bluetooth LE and 802.15.4 protocols. You provide a certified Bluetooth LE 5.2 stack along with OpenThread and ZigBee 3.0 stacks. An additional offering includes 802.15.4 OpenMax stack, which allows you complete flexibility when using the 802.15.4 portion of the radio. In the STM32WB ecosystem, we provide a professional grade Bluetooth mesh solution for your use. Dual core and full power. Inside the STM32WB, we have integrated our STM32L4 DNA with a Cortex M0 core and our own Bluetooth LE radio. All of the STM32WB devices have dual core capability, which allows us to have very low current consumption. We also have multiple low power run, sleep modes, and even a low power mode where we save Bluetooth contacts, consuming 600 nanomans. At ST Microelectronics, we follow the ULP Mark standard for low power comparisons. The STM32WB has a ULP Mark of 303, which is one of the highest marks among the Bluetooth devices in the industry today, with a very few devices achieving a score of over 300. In IoT Protection, it's addressed by our STM32Trust ecosystem. And addressing these needs, the STM32Trust brings 12 security functions to align with customer use cases and security standards. The STM32Trust brings the documentation software tools to cover these 12 security functions. All of these 12 security functions have been identified as a common criteria that all IoT devices require to effectively implement security in the industry today. When we look at savings, we integrate numerous referrals, including communication IPs, analog hardware, digital hardware, and RF tuning inside the STM32WB. USB full speed 2.0 crystalline means that there is no need for a dedicated EXO for the USB. In the RF portion, we integrate a ballon filter and provide EXO tuning capacitors to help with EXO variability across your design. Switch mode power supply integration allows us to drive down the power consumption and save as much battery power as possible. When we look at our offer, the STM32WB series is not just one, but six devices across three different part numbers, bringing the total offering to 44 different part numbers, including the module. In the tools, the STM32Q ecosystem means more than just code. It provides the basis of the framework for hardware and software solutions. When we look at the STM32WB series, we have three different board offerings where the discovery kit includes the module, a small OLED screen, and cap touch functionality. In all of these hardware boards, an STLink programmer is included so you can program without purchasing additional hardware. In the software offering, we have the STM32QMX tool, which is our main configuration and production selection tool. STM32Q monitor RF, which allows you to write text scripts and perform RF testing. STM32Q programmer, which can be used to upgrade install stacks, erase, and program the device. STM32Q ID, which is our free Eclipse-based environment that you can use to develop, configure, and download your code. In longevity, all STM32s have a 10-year commitment from SD Microelectronics. This commitment is renewed in every January of every calendar year. Now, let's look at the STM32WB Getting Started series, which you already know because you're already here on YouTube. The main organization of the videos is basic videos at the start and then more advanced ones at the end. Now, essentially, we also take the videos in chronological order, meaning the basic tools install, some of the basic examples, and then moving to the more advanced type of videos. Let's take a look at part five just as an example, the CUBE WB heart rate monitor. This video starts out with the FE showing you exactly what the end result is, meaning how the demo should look. As we can see here, the heart rate monitor is connected to the STM32WB from the phone. Then the FE is going to exactly what you need to do to modify the project and modify it for your needs. Now, let's jump around a little bit and we'll look at the part seven, which is over-the-air update. This is something that pretty much everyone likes to have a look at when they're using a Bluetooth device because at some point you're going to need to update your device. The FE's go into different methods using a physical link, and in this case, again, we're going to be looking at over-the-air update. We can see here that the FE's have actually prepared the project and it starts flashing on the board. Now, in this case, to have this flash, it would take a little long if we wanted to show the whole thing flash. But what we've done here is we've sped it up and we'll go to the end here to show you what it looks like. You can see here it finishes and the upgrade is successful. Now, the next one I want to show you is part 14. 14 is very interesting to have a look at because this is actually connecting the STM32WB to an Alexa ZigBee Hub, which is very good use case and one of the other functions of the STM32WB, which is ZigBee connections along with Bluetooth. Now, this video is quite lengthy, so I skipped to the part where our FE's have actually done all the legwork and they've actually loaded the code onto the STM32WB. Now, what they're doing here is they're using the app on the iPhone to discover the device. Now, what we're doing here is we reset the board because it has to be in a known kind of state, which is at the start to be discoverable in this project. You can see here it finds it as a light switch and from there you can actually set it up and it's completely connected to the Amazon Alexa at this point. You can see here it toggles the power on the LED either on or off. The STM32WB series is at 14 parts right now and there will be more coming in the next few months. Bluetooth Mesh is one of the more elaborated ones and we'll be adding that to the list of the STM32WB getting started series. Now that you've learned the basics of the STM32WB series, check out these other resources which will continue your learning journey. As you have already found this getting started series here, there are numerous other videos on YouTube you can find on the STM32 Microelectronics video library. On ST.com there are multiple places to access learning content including our massive open online courses or MOOC for short brings you hours of content with experts from the ST family and that is the basics of the STM32WB and where you can go for additional content aside from the STM32WB getting started series. Now you're ready to explore the STM32WB with our FAA team in this getting started series videos. Thank you for your time and attention.


Sell Jordan Howard. Howard's now scored four touchdowns across his last three games played and during this time He's out attempted to reach Cohen 48 to 17. So those are your two selling points He's seeing volume on the ground and he's scoring touchdowns But the truth is things could not be going better for Jordan Howard The Bears played the Jets and the Bills over the last two weeks leading to strong positive game scripts The game scripts were so good that Chicago didn't even run a play while trailing in those games And then three weeks ago against New England Howard ran the ball for just 39 yards He just happened to find the end zone Jordan Howard has just one target since week six And we know that targets are far more valuable than carries in fantasy football Now the team schedule isn't that bad from here on out But his touchdown and game script dependency makes him a really volatile fantasy football asset And that's generally not the type of player that I want on my fantasy team


And obviously the last two weeks, clearly not good enough. But I've done it, and we're going to continue to work. That's the only thing we know how to do. I mean, that's what it is. We're going to play seven more games. And as bad as this feels, a lot of things can happen in seven games. We're not going to go down this road where you can't blame this game. You can blame everybody when you get spoke the way we have in the last five days. It's always tough when guys are out, but it's never an excuse. You've got to find a way to get the job done. And it wasn't a good enough effort from us on the offensive side of the ball. We'll get back on track, and that's the first thing. Let's not beat ourselves first. Let's go out there and execute. When we've done that, it's been pretty decent. And that's what we've got to get back to. And our guys will respond. We've got the right guys. Hey, green energy all day. Green energy all three bases all day. Play together, play smart. Let's get the job done, clean all three. One, two, three. So here is Matt Ryan, who got, quite frankly, a little banged up a week ago sitting at loss at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. And Atlanta will start first in 10 from its 32-yard line. Play fake by Ryan on first down, looking for the rookie pits. Now we'll check it down to Smith. The fullback to catch off the shoot tops at the 35. It'll be a gain of right at about six on first down. Backside catch, Gage, who will die for the first down. In motion, Ryan a quick snap, looks left. There is Patterson. The catch, first down. Robinson again, and a good play by Atlanta. And that's Grady Jarrett grabbing Robinson as he tried to find a cut lane at the line of scrimmage and ended up with not much. Ryan will take the snap. Jax bringing the pressure. Matt mails to his right, slips it to Davis. He'll catch it 20, 25, first down 30, out to the 35. Here's a toss. Patterson running left, big hole, 40, 45. CP out of bounds. Jacksonville's 48 yard line. Gaumann will get the carrot. Splits to the right side, hard run. 15 yards for Wayne Gaumann. Ryan goes to work under center. He'll hand to Patterson back in the game. Cordero inside to 10. It'll be first and goal at the 7. Two tights to the right and pits the receiver over there. Patterson the running back. He'll get the call. Cordero sweeping left around the edge, hit the pylon, touchdown Atlanta. Cordero Patterson's third touchdown run of the year. Puts the Falcons on the board with 38 seconds to play first period. Two tights, two receivers, single back, flagged down, it'll be on Atlanta. Fowler, the former Jaguar trying to get there. They're going to throw for Lawrence. It's intercepted. It is picked off going through the backside by Deron Harman. But I don't think it's going to stay in. Illegal formation. Oh! Number 11, covered another eligible receiver. The other one! Rejected to play, first down the line. First interception and won three and a half games for Trevor Lawrence, Arch. Not the greatest field position, but Atlanta has the ball. 7-0 Atlanta. Give is Patterson off the right side. Hits the cutback. Patterson, 40, 41 yard line. Goes Cordero Patterson on a big run before Nevin Lawson. Makes the tackle after a gain of 27. Rejected to Robinson, into the stack, ball is out. And Atlanta says they've got it. And Anthony Rush comes out of there saying, I banged it out of there. Atlanta's got it. And they do have it. This one is in plus territory. Point left. Arch for Youngway Coo. Morested will hold the Harris snap. The kick is away. And it is good. Flag is down on the play after the 43 yard kick. So let's check the marker here. 5-yard penalty. If that's on Jacksonville, that might result in the first down. Here's Ryan on the near hash mark. Give is Patterson. Straight ahead. Touchdown, Cordero Patterson. They got a hand on him at about 2. Nevin Lawson got a little arm swing out there. And Patterson ran right through that, Arch. Boy, what a good block by Keith Smith. Fullback is up on the linebacker. If you get that block, Cordero Patterson untouched until the 1-yard line. Here's Mickens on the goal line. He'll bring it out of the deep near corner. Mickens tries to circle the 20. Gets to the 25. And Coo and Keith Smith combined on the tackle. Shotgun snap. Lawrence on the play fake. Up in the pocket. Fowler will get to him and drop it. Tried to cut back and get pulled down. Another nice play there. Ogan Hager to throw. And tried to go to Marvin Jones. And Terrell broke it up in midfield to end the drive. Looks left throw. Smith to catch. Stiff arm, 35. Keith Smith, a major league amour. Out to the 40 to the 41. Long throw. Caught by Patterson, 45. Cordero steps away into Jacksonville territory. Three right, one to the boundary at the left. Here's Ryan. Got to get rid of it, does. Pits to catch. First grab of the day. Inside the 25. Taken down at the 18 is Kyle Pits. Sharp to the right. Here's Ryan. He wants to throw. Quick throw. Caught. Gage, touchdown Atlanta. Oh my goodness. Russell Gage into the end zone. His second touchdown catch of the year. Right to the left. Lawrence from the gun. Pressure coming. He gets away from Fowler. Moves the pocket to his right. Got to throw for the end zone. Incomplete. Try from right is away. And it is good. So Jacksonville cuts it to a seven point game. So the ball will be at the 47, 324 to go. First down give, this is Mike Davis. Across midfield, he'll pick up five. That's a big time day. We talked about they needed to control the line of scrimmage, especially on first down. They have done that today. Throw the blitz, quick throw. Tried to go to Zacchaeus. And it was broken up on the play by Campbell. It's inside the 10 at the five. He'll try and make a play. 15, Mickens tries to make a move back up field. Walker, and in the ball, pop loose. I think Jacksonville is going to fall on it, though, with Chris Claybrooks. Here come the Falcons trying to get there. Lawrence flips it and dropped behind. Incomplete. There, up top, incomplete. Trying to go to Treadwell. Got no flag on the cover from Garen Hall. Fourth and 10 at the 29. Could be the ball game. Atlanta leads by a touchdown with 123 to play. Play clock at one. Lawrence gets it snapped. Trevor, quick throw, incomplete. Trying to go to LaVisca Chanel. And Atlanta holds and forces the turnover on downs.  You already know that. Great quarterback. But defensively, we just played as a unit this week. Just came together as one. Everybody just did their job, and, you know, came out with a double.  You know, we all took it to heart and off his line. Man, they came in. They really did. They showed what they really can do. I thought the offense line played really well. We ran the ball. You know, tough, physical. Thought our running backs played well, which is what we need it.  They worked hard, you know, the last couple of weeks. And I thought, you know, set the standard for what they're capable of doing. I think it says a lot about the character of this team and this staff after the last couple of weeks.  Keep trying to improve. And really proud of this team and the staff.