And it's now time for Question Period, a member from Elgin, Middlesex, London. Thank you, Speaker. Speaker, my question to the Premier. Premier, the Greater Sudbury Police Services commit their members to four key values. Those four values are respect, integrity, commitment, and honesty. Do you believe the members of the Police Services Board, especially the Chair, are the above the same values of the police servicemen and women? Do you believe the board members, like your friend Jerry Logheed, are above the law? Thank you, Premier. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. You know, it's very hard on one hand to say that we have a deep respect for the Police Services Board. And then on the other hand, question that the capacity of the Police Services Board to make decisions, Mr. Speaker. I think the member opposite knows full well that the Police Services Board act independently, Mr. Speaker. They have responsibility for police services in their municipalities. And, Mr. Speaker, I have a lot of confidence in their ability in Sudbury to do their job, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Thank you, Speaker. Back to the Premier. Premier, it's obvious that members of the Liberal Party do not hold themselves to the same standards. The Sudbury Police commit to integrity by pledging we perform our duties with high ethical and moral standards. The service says our actions demonstrate our respect for the community. Jerry Logheed has been recorded offering an apparent bribe on behalf of your party. Premier, how is he demonstrating integrity or respect for Sudbury? Mr. Speaker, I say to the member opposite, the Police Services Boards in this province have a very serious responsibility for the provision of adequate and effective services in their municipalities, Mr. Speaker. And I have a lot of faith in their ability to do that, including, Mr. Speaker, in this instance. Mr. Speaker, the member opposite knows that there is an investigation going on. He also knows that that investigation is going on outside of this legislature. And we're going to let that unfold with the authorities. And we will continue to cooperate with them, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. The member from the Renfrew Nipissing Pembroke will come to order. And I will keep track. Thank you. Let's figure back to the Premier again. Premier, let me tell you what the Police Service says about honesty. They say they are truthful, open, and fair. About commitment, they say we are dedicated to serving the needs of our community. The nomination certainly was not truthful, open, or fair. It is clear Jerry Logheed does not live up to the values of the Board. Premier, do you believe Jerry Logheed's actions were honest and in line with the values of the Board? Minister of Community Safety and Protection Services. Minister of Community Safety. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And I again remind the member opposite that there's a process in place when it comes to dealing with matters like this. There's a code of conduct in place that is enacted through the regulation. And it's really up to the local police services board to determine whether they suspect if there's a breach of code of conduct. And if so, they can refer the matter to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission. In fact, Speaker, I'm sure the member opposite knows that exactly the process that is being followed now. The survey police services has been in touch with the Ontario Civilian Police Commission. And I'm sure OCPC is looking into the matter. That is the proper course. That is the process that's laid out. Is Amsland from the government, Speaker? We should respect that process. Thank you very much. A new question to the member from Dr. Calibre. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. These questions outside or inside the legislature, you have a responsibility to answer them. These tapes don't lie. You obviously had not yet made the decision to appoint Mr. Thibault on December 11 when you spoke to Mr. Olivier. Mr. Olivier said that, quote, he told you he wanted 24 hours to think about it. If you had told him you were appointing Mr. Thibault, there'd be nothing to think about. There would be no nomination. Yet, Pat Sabara called 24 hours later on December 12 to tell Olivier that if he was to continue, he would put the Premier in a tough position to make a decision about an appointment or to continue on with the nomination. So again, the question, when exactly did you tell Mr. Olivier you were appointing another candidate? Mr. Speaker, let me say again, and the member opposite may not want to accept that there's an investigation going on outside of the House, but there is. I have said clearly and direct answer to this question that I had decided after my meeting with Glen Thibault at the end of November that Glen Thibault was the best person for our role as a candidate in Sudbury. Mr. Speaker, I had made that decision, so Mr. Speaker, I made that statement two Fridays ago. I've been very upfront about that, Mr. Speaker, but there is an investigation going on and it's going on outside of this House, Mr. Speaker. And we continue to demand answers inside this House. In the interests of government transparency, let's try this again. Mr. Olivier has told the police that on December 11, you asked him to step aside. You tell us in this chamber that on December 11, you told Andrew Olivier you were appointing a candidate. What you say in this chamber is not subject to perjury laws, but what Mr. Olivier says to the police absolutely is. So which version of this conversation is correct? Mr. Speaker, I have worked very hard to make it clear that I take this matter very seriously. I made a statement two Fridays ago, Mr. Speaker. I talked about the decision that I made about who the candidate was going to be in Sudbury, Mr. Speaker. I was very clear about that and I have said. I'm going to ask the member from Land Arc to withdraw. Oh, I believe I heard it. Carry on. I have said, Mr. Speaker, that we will work with the authorities, but Mr. Speaker, that work is not going to go on inside this legislature. The investigation is happening outside the legislature and we need to let it unfold there, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Final supplementary. Premier, what is clear is what Jerry Lawheed said. It's on tape. What is clear is what Mr. Olivier said. Deputy Health Leader, second time. What is clear is what Pat Subara said. It's on tape. What is not clear is what you did, what you offered, what you guaranteed. This chamber is not subject to perjury laws. Order. Please finish. The only thing that is not clear is what you said, what you offered, what you directed your staff to do. Is the real reason there are two different versions of this account conversation? Because in here you're protected from perjury. Out there, Mr. Olivier isn't? Premier. Minister of Community Safety, Correctional Services. Thank you very much, Speaker. And again, I remind the member opposite of all the members as they recognize that there is an ongoing investigation. This is not the place or the venue to be engaging in an investigation, Speaker. That is up to the independent authorities to look into the matter and make a determination. I think, Speaker, the only proper thing to do is let the authorities undertake the investigation and make the final determination. In fact, Speaker, I will say I agree with the member from Leeds-Granville where he said to QP Briefing that there is an investigation going on. The government should not be interfering. And I quote, he said, let it run its course. I agree, Speaker, the member from Leeds-Granville as well. Let the investigation run its course. Thank you. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Premier. When did the Premier decide to appoint her Sudbury candidate? Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And I have, again, I've answered that question many times and I actually have answered it this morning, Mr. Speaker. I said quite clearly in my public statement that after I had met Glen Tebow at the end of November, I had decided that he was the best candidate for Sudbury for the Liberals, Mr. Speaker. And I think, turn out, Mr. Speaker, the people of Sudbury chose Glen Tebow as their representative at Queen's Park, Mr. Speaker. And we're very pleased to have him as the leader of the third party knows. There is an investigation going on, but it's going on outside of this house and we will work with the authority, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Speaker, I assume a letter was sent by the Premier because the Liberal Party Constitution says, quote, the leader shall communicate his or her intention to make such appointment as soon as possible and in writing to the nomination commissioner and to the President of the Constituency Association, end quote. Her from Newmark and her will come to order. Speaker, on what date did the Premier write her letter to the nomination commissioner and the President of the Constituency Association? Mr. Speaker, again, I say to the member opposite, I have made a clear statement in the public realm, Mr. Speaker. I have said exactly what our position is. I have said that we will continue to work with the authorities. The fact is that the authorities will be asking questions of me, Mr. Speaker. I will work with them, but that investigation and that process is going to happen outside of this legislature as it should, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, final supplementary. Well, Speaker, it's obvious the Premier has her version of the Liberal-Bribery scandal. The problem is that her story doesn't match anyone else's. And the Premier's refusing to answer the question, Speaker, to provide any information that would back up her story at all. When will the Premier provide some evidence, Speaker, that backs up her version of the story and makes it clear that Pat Cerbera's version is wrong, Jerry Lahi's version is wrong, Glantebo's version is wrong, Andrew Olivier's version is wrong, the Siberian Liberal-Riding Association's version is wrong, the OPP's version is wrong, and Election Ontario's version is wrong? Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Well, as I've said, the investigation is happening outside of this House. Mr. Speaker, I know that the leader of the third party would like to rewrite a version of what happened in Sudbury, Mr. Speaker. The Deputy Premier actually says that she's bored with question period, and now the Premier doesn't want to answer any questions about the Sudbury-Bribery scandal. Speaker, this place belongs to Ontarians, and they deserve answers, and it shouldn't take a police investigation to get answers to some very important questions. But the Premier seems to think that she's above the law and above our democracy. Does the Premier think that that sort of liberal arrogance is acceptable? Thank you, Premier. Mr. Speaker, if the leader of the third party is suggesting that I don't have the stamina to answer her questions, she's absolutely wrong, Mr. Speaker. Stop the clock, Mr. Speaker. This is my moment to remind all of us that we are racing to the top. The Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry I could do without the interjection. And that goes for members on both sides, because I'm hearing while she's putting the question the same amount of noise. Please continue. Speaker, yesterday the Premier said there is an investigation outside this House or outside this legislature a full 27 times, and she's said it yet again today a couple of times. Speaker, Ontarians shouldn't need the police to get simple answers to basic questions from the Premier. Especially when the Premier keeps insisting that there was no wrongdoing. Will the Premier show some respect to Ontarians and start answering important questions like who decided to offer Andrew Olivier a job? Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And I have a deep respect for the people of Ontario and I have a deep respect for the policy issues that our government is grappling with, Mr. Speaker. And I have every, absolutely every desire to answer questions about government policy, any questions that are posed to me. And Mr. Speaker, I will answer any questions that are asked of me. I have done that. I will continue to do that. And the answer to the question that the leader of the third party has posed is that there is an investigation happening outside of this House, Mr. Speaker. I will continue to work with the authorities as I expect everyone would, Mr. Speaker. Free bribery scandal and the way that this Premier is handling it raises some really basic questions about this government, about her government, Speaker. It raises questions about whether people can believe her government. It raises questions about how a government can end up with four concurrent police investigations into its actions. It raises basic questions, Speaker, about trust, about whose interests the Liberals are putting first in the work that they do. Now, can the Premier answer a simple question and tell Ontarians who gave Pat Cerbera and Jerry Lahi their orders to offer a job to Andrew Olivier so that he would not run for the nomination in the Secretary of Justice? Just because members shift where they're sitting during the day, I have the floor. It doesn't mean that it gives you the right to heckle any more or any less. You're not supposed to. Premier, please. You know, I have said and I will say again that I take this matter very seriously, but when the premise of the question is something that I absolutely disagree with, Mr. Speaker, it's important for me to be clear with the people of Ontario where we're at. There's an investigation going on. Elections Ontario, the Chief Electoral Officer has said clearly, and I quote, I am neither deciding to prosecute a matter nor determining anyone's guilt or innocence. Those decisions are respectively for prosecutors and judges, unquote. So it's up to the prosecutors and the judges, Mr. Speaker. It's up to that process to unfold as it should, as the Chief Electoral Officer has said, Mr. Speaker. And so that's why I continue to say that the investigation is happening outside of this house. It is not up to the leader of the third party, Mr. Speaker, to pass judgment. It's up to the authorities to undertake that investigation outside of this legislation. Absolutely. Thank you. A new question? A member from Leeds, Cringle. Thanks very much, Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Premier, yesterday I asked you some very simple and straightforward questions. Yet after you left the house and you were admonished by a member of the... A member from Eglinton. A member of your staff actually said, answer the truth. Premier, I'm going to ask you again. Yes or no? Have you or your lawyers been asked by the OPP for a meeting to discuss the Sudbury private scandal? I have said publicly that I was going to be meeting with the OPP. I've been asked for that meeting. But I don't know, Mr. Speaker, that it's been set up. I don't know the date. So I've said that clearly. And as I said, I will continue to cooperate with the authorities in every way. Premier, again, back to the Premier. Again, this is what we face with this government. You know, we had a debate yesterday on concurrence of supply. There's so many questions. This government refuses to answer. When it comes to the gas plant committee, they shut it down even knowing that emails have been deleted and hard drives have been wiped clean. We, in the opposition on both sides, have asked repeatedly over and over and over again who knew what, who directed who to make these offers. Premier, are you going to come to New York City? Are you finally going to answer those questions that members of the opposition have asked? Who authorized these offers to be made to Andrew Olivier from your party? Thank you, Premier. Again, that I made a decision that Glen Thiebaud was the right person to be our candidate in Sudbury, Mr. Speaker. I made that decision at the end of November. And Mr. Speaker, I've made a public statement about that. And I will continue to work with the authorities on the investigation that's happening outside of this House, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Your question to members of the team is changed today. My question is to the Premier. The Premier is aware that she has the authority to appoint or revoke any appointment to a board or commission with the stroke of a pan. Given the appointments are done at the Premier's discretion, when will you file the paperwork to remove Jerry Lockheed from the Police Services Boards of Sudbury? Premier. Minister of Community Safety, Corrections and Services. Minister of Communities. Thank you very much, Speaker. And I again, I will repeat what I've said at numerous occasions in this House. And the member opposite, I am sure, knows about this process as well. That the Police Services Board are responsible for local policing. They have both municipal and provincial appointees. The members of the boards are the ones who elect chair. And they're all within the scope of a Code of Conduct speaker. And it's up to them to determine if they suspect a breach of the Code of Conduct. Then we have an independent body, the Ontario Civilian Police Commission, to make a determination whether a breach of Code of Conduct has taken place. It is not up to the government speaker to make that determination. My understanding is, and I'm sure the member opposite knows, that the Sudbury Police Services Board has reached out to OCPC. Thank you. Supplementary. Well, the Premier would also, again to the Premier, the Premier would know that she has the authority on the Legislative Act 2006, Section 76, that says they serve at your pleasure. Premier, I think we both agree that those appointed to Public Boards and Commission should meet a standard of integrity. Clearly, Jury Law Heats integrity is in question. Premier, by not using your power to rule Mr. Law Heats from the Police Services Board, are you saying integrity does not matter to public appointees? Thank you very much, Speaker. The work of the Police Services Board is extremely important. Police Services Board, Speaker, are created pursuant to the Police Services Act. They've been given some very specific responsibility under the Police Services Act to ensure that there's adequate and effective policing within their jurisdiction. That's why, Speaker, their work is so important that we have a separate Code of Conduct that is enacted through regulation to ensure that their proper conduct is met. On top of that, Speaker, to ensure that the Code of Conduct is always abided by, we have a separate independent body called the Ontario Civilian Police Commission to oversee Police Services Board. So you can see, Speaker, that we have taken several steps to make sure that the process is always arm's length from the government that the local communities are in charge when it comes to local policing. And as we know in this particular case, the Police Services Board has referred the matter. Thank you. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Government and Consumer Services. It's about government policy, Mr. Speaker. I understand that your ministry is responsible for providing oversight to Tarion, an administrative authority that manages the Ontario New Home Warranties Act to ensure new homeowners are protected. Mr. Speaker, every year in Etobicoke Lakeshore hundreds of new homes and condos are built and people move into them. And they often ask me for some advice about how Tarion functions. His purchasing a new home is very significant and it's one of those things that most Ontarians might only do once or twice in their lifetime. It's important to ensure that these homes are properly built. And I know that problems with a new home can be a major source of stress for some homeowners. And your ministry has information available which can help them handle these problems without further anxiety. Through you, Mr. Speaker. Minister, can you share with us your recommendations for Ontarians who have a concern with the new home they've purchased? Thank you. Minister of Government and Consumer Services. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to thank the hard-working member from Etobicoke Lakeshore for this important question. It's certainly part of our ministry's mandate to ensure that consumers are well informed and protected under the Ontario New Home Warranties Plan Act. We're periodically asked by Ontarians questions about Terrion and I'm always interested to hear the feedback. The first step for a new home purchaser is to become well informed. Like any warranty program, consumers should be aware of the terms of the agreement and make sure to report any concerns within the timeframe of the warranty coverage period. Consumers are protected one year for any unauthorized changes. They're protected for up to two years on electrical, plumbing, heating or water issues and up to seven years on major structural defects like the failure of a load-bearing wall. I encourage consumers to first seek a solution with their builders, but they should not hesitate to follow up with Terrion issues are not properly addressed. My expectation is Terrion will continue to help Ontarians and I look forward to continuing to work with them. Thank you. Supplementary. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to thank the minister for all of his hard work for consumers and especially for new homeowners. Many people in Etobicoke Lakeshore are really interested to hear about the progress Terrion is making to support Ontarians when they purchase new homes. Mr. Speaker, I know the minister has worked closely with Terrion to strengthen accountability and ensure consumer interests are protected. I'm very proud of our government for its ongoing focus on transparency and accountability and know the minister of government and consumer services has approached his responsibilities with that in mind. While Terrion is an independent not-for-profit organization, I understand the minister is working with its leadership to improve its consumer protection. Mr. Speaker, can the minister please explain what steps are being taken to improve consumer protection for Terrion? Thank you, minister. Thank you, Speaker. And again to the member from Etobicoke Lakeshore, certainly happy to outline ways in which we've worked with Terrion to improve consumer protection. I'd like to start by referencing the Terrion Builder Registry which was relaunched in December of 2013. It tracks important information on builders across Ontario where they've built homes, if their licenses have been revoked or suspended, how many claims have been filed against them. Within the next year, Terrion will be adding additional information to the registry. Terrion has also doubled the warranty coverage from $150,000 to $300,000. They've made changes to the board, removing the majority of industry members so that there's truly a balance on the board. And Speaker, these improvements are working. Data indicates that last year in over 365,000 homes under warranty, only .27% have had a site visit from Terrion. We're continuing to work to strengthen the DA legislation. I look forward to making these improvements. Speaker, while the opposition talks about consumer protection, we're acting on it. My question is for the Premier. Good morning, Premier. Your pattern of behaviour with your Sudbury scandal is hauntingly familiar to that of the gas plant scandal. Both have several people named in the OPP warrants, continuing to hold plum, well-paying government jobs or government appointments. Pat Sorbera is still in the Premier's office, but so is Becky Caud Downey, who admitted to deleting gas plant emails. Leon Corby's still advising you, yet Laura Miller added his hard drive to the list to be deleted. We're still waiting for you to ask BC Premier Christy Clark to tell Laura Miller to come back and answer the OPP's questions. Premier, do you plan on holding any of these people to account? Well, Mr. Speaker, again, let me just say to the member opposite that he knows full well that there's an investigation going on outside of the House. He may have made decisions about what people did or what they didn't do, Mr. Speaker, but in fact there are authorities who are looking into this, Mr. Speaker, and we will continue to work with those authorities and that will happen outside of the legislature. Thank you. Thank you. Well, it's hard to, to the Premier, it's hard to avoid those tapes and the deleted files which have been recovered. I know it's hard for you to acknowledge those, but Premier, there's mounting evidence that people of Ontario aren't satisfied with your handling of the Sudbury by-election scandal. As many as two-thirds of Ontarians believe Pat Cervera and Jerry Lawheed should step down while the OPP investigate bribery allegations. Premier, your blatant liberal self-interest is putting you out of step with the democratic values we hold in this province and indeed in this country. When will you stop protecting your liberal insiders and start protecting the integrity of the office you hold? Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Well, if we want to talk about a democratic process, the by-election was a democratic process. Absolutely. Of the situation, Mr. Speaker, and they chose the liberal candidate, Glen Tebow, to be their representative of the Queen's Park, Mr. Speaker. I have full faith in the people of Sudbury and their ability to make a sound decision, Mr. Speaker. And we're very pleased to have the new member for Sudbury sitting with our government, Mr. Speaker. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Mr. Speaker, when did the Premier when was the Premier contacted by the OPP to indicate that they wanted to investigate or they wanted to speak to her about the bribery scandal? Mr. Speaker, as I've said, we'll be working with the authorities. I've said clearly that I will be having a conversation with the OPP, Mr. Speaker. I actually don't know the date of that. I know that that is being arranged and, as I've said quite clearly, I will continue to cooperate with the authorities on the investigation outside of the legislature. Thank you. Thank you very much. I have two questions. I'm going to ask the first question again. When did the OPP contact the Premier to say that they wanted to meet with the Premier regarding the bribery scandal, the one interview about that scandal? One, and two, the second question is when that meeting is set, when that meeting is set, when will the Premier keep that meeting secret or the Premier tell Ontarians when that meeting will take place? Mr. Speaker, that meeting is being set up. I don't know the date of that. The investigation is happening outside of this legislature. I will work with the authorities, and that is as it should be. We cannot undertake the investigation here in the legislature, Mr. Speaker. Much as the third party would like to do that, it has to happen outside of the legislature, and that is as it should be. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Economic Development and Employment and Infrastructure and concerns things that Ontarians care about. Job creation and investment. Just last week, Ford Canada announced an additional 400 jobs to their OPP facility. This is where the global production of the new Ford Edge Crossover SUV is set to launch. The OPP facility will be one of the most sophisticated assembly plants in the world. This is great news for Oakville, for Burlington, Hulton Region, and indeed our province. As a matter of fact, many of the employees who work at the plant live in my riding, Mr. Speaker. And this announcement bills on one made just a year and a half ago when our government in partnership with Ford Canada and the federal government announced a $700 million investment to upgrade the Oakville assembly plant. This partnership has secured more than 2,800 jobs. Mr. Speaker, my understanding is that this is not the only good news in the auto sector this week. Would the minister please update us on some of the exciting investments and partnerships taking place in our province between our government and the auto sector? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, it is great to get another question on government policy. The second today, it's good to see the member standing up for a very important announcement made by Ford and Oakville. An announcement that certainly impacts her constituents, Oakville and constituents throughout the greater Toronto-Hamilton area. And I say that, Mr. Speaker, and it's not the only good news announcement that we've had this week. Our government also announced through the Southwestern Ontario Development Fund that we're partnering with Toyota Bushacoo Canada by investing $1 million to expand its Elmira manufacturing facility. Through this investment, Mr. Speaker, we'll be able to create and sustain 460 highly skilled jobs. This strategic investment further enhances Ontario's industry supply chain. Mr. Speaker, I know why the side opposite gets upset when we see all these great investments in auto because if they were empowerment, our auto industry would have left on. Thank you. Supplementary. Mr. Speaker, I'd like to thank the minister for that update. This is great news not only for the sector but for the related advanced manufacturing facilities located in Burlington that will benefit from these investments. I know that experts agree, whether it's CIBC, Toronto Dominion Bank, the RBC, Bank of Montreal or the Conference Board of Canada, Ontario is projected for economic growth in 2015 and is poised to lead the country. Yeah, that's great. Indeed, the Conference Board of Canada is forecasting that Ontario's economic growth will be at 2.9% this year while above the national average of 1.9%. Comparing this with last week's auto announcements, clearly our economic plan is working for 2.9%. Could the minister please share with the House further evidence of these kinds of investments and clearly the corresponding confidence in our economy that they represent? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, minister. Absolutely, Mr. Speaker. I'll pick up where I left off. We remember that the party opposite the PC said, let those plants close. Mr. Speaker, we did not let those plants close. In fact, we've seen $4 billion in November. We've seen investments in Alston and Honda $857 million. Lindemar and Guelph almost half a billion dollars. Chrysler and Windsor, $2 billion. Ford, they announced the GT Ford was going to be made in Markham, Ontario, the coolest car being built in North America today. GM, half a billion dollars, Mr. Speaker, just made that announcement a few weeks ago, and then we had the announcement by the House, our auto sector was growing again, Mr. Speaker. It's growing because of the investments and partnerships we made in spite of their policy, which would have been to abandon the sector. We're proud of that, Mr. Speaker. Very proud of that. Do you see it, please? New question, a member from York Central. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. About your bribery scandal in Sudbury. Frankly, my constituents and I are appalled by your deputy chief of staff's involvement and your top fundraiser involvement. In offering an inducement to last year's Liberal candidate so have not run in the recent by-election. This is a new kind of scandal that sheds light on one of your backroom deals. When the chief electoral officer forwarded his investigation of this matter to the OPP, he said the charges and the suggests are unprecedented. Unprecedented means he has never seen such a breach of ethics under the Ontario Elections Act. Premier, are you aware of another time that our chief electoral officer forwarded his concerns to the OPP? Mr. Speaker, I hope when the member opposite's constituents are in touch with her that she goes on to tell them that Elections Ontario determined that the allegations against me and against the member for Sudbury were faceless. I hope she goes on then to tell the Mr. Speaker that I have said repeatedly that we'll continue to cooperate fully with the authorities and then I hope she quotes from the chief electoral officer who said and I quote Mr. Speaker, I am neither deciding to prosecute a matter nor determining anyone's guilt or innocence. I hope that she gives her constituents the full story Mr. Speaker when they contact her. This is a serious situation. This is not like any other accusations. The chief electoral officer says it's unprecedented. The OPP will most likely take his interpretation of the law when considering charges. Premier, why are you acting as if this is routine? Like it's a normal process for every election? Sadly it is for them. We all know this is an unprecedented situation. Premier, you have not seen fit to ask either Sabara or Lahi to step down. To demonstrate your recognition of the seriousness of these unprecedented charges what action are you prepared to take? Mr. Speaker Premier? Here again. Delete your comments. Well again Mr. Speaker I'm sure that the member opposite when your constituents contact her I'm sure she lets them know that I have said repeatedly that I'm taking this matter very seriously that I am working with the authorities Mr. Speaker and that I will continue to do so Mr. Speaker it's an investigation that is taking place outside of this legislature and I will continue to work with the authorities. Thank you Mr. Speaker my question to the Premier Speaker this morning the Toronto 2015 unveiled the competition medals for Pan Am and Para Pan Games I would like to do without the interjections. Member put his question please. Speaker good news the first gold medal will be going to the Liberal Government for outstanding achievement and synchronized scandals the electoral process in Sudbury on what date and what time did the Premier communicate in writing her intention to appoint Glenty Bo as candidate for the secondary by-election. This morning I had the opportunity to join the Minister the Finance Minister for Canada the Mayor of Toronto Chief Laform from the south of the new credit and many others in fact there was about 500 people as we celebrated the unveiling of the new medals that the gold medal is actually from Ontario it's mine from Ontario here in partnership with the Royal Canadian Mint and Mady Designer and many other people Mr. Speaker I think we should be so proud of the fact that we have the largest international sporting event in the history of this country taking place on 18 Tuesdays from today. So I'm very very proud that it's coming and we're very proud of our record as a Governor when it comes to the Pan Am Games. Thank you supplementary. Thank you Speaker basically back to the Premier Speaker this is a very simple direct question and the Premier is not answering Premier I'm afraid I'm going to have to award another gold medal for verbal gymnastics. It's a shame you won't let me hand out any medals for accountability the question was on what date and what time did the Premier in fact appoint Glen T. Bow as candidate for the Suburban election Mr. Speaker the medals that were unveiled today for the first time in any international Olympic associated games were unveiled with braille and I thought it was incredible when it comes to Ontario and these games are going to be the most accessible games in the history of any games out there and I'm very proud of our record the minister from Hamilton the member from Hamilton can joke and say and associate the Pan Am Games but we take these games very serious the accessibility piece is a serious part and we're very proud of our record the medal the member from Kingston thank you Mr. Speaker my question is for the minister responsible for women's issues minister on Friday of last week the Premier led an Ontario delegation which included you the minister of Aboriginal Affairs and the minister of community safety and correctional services to the round table on missing and murdered indigenous women and girls in Ottawa this inquiry would provide a renewed focus on the underlying root causes it would shed light on the severity of the issue and it would help point to potential solutions that is why I was so proud when this house passed my motion unanimously to support the call by the national Aboriginal organizations for a national inquiry on murdered and missing Aboriginal women and girls the disproportionate violence against Aboriginal women and girls is a national tragedy we must work with our Aboriginal brothers and sisters Minister will you please update the house on last week's round table thank you Minister Trillum you serve us we want to thank the member for Kingston and the Islands for question and her activism on this issue not just today but since she became a member of this legislature so I thank her for that she was a step in the right direction and we are pleased the federal government and Canadian awareness campaign however speaker there could have been a lot more action we could have agreed upon on based on the discussions at the round table we identified it was actually 10 specific things from the internal delegation we felt were important actually we can take right now to improve the situation facing Aboriginal women and girls we are proposing a social economic plan for Aboriginal women and girls supported by leaders of Canada's provinces and territories national Aboriginal organizations to address root cause of violence we need to push ourselves very hard speaker in the coming months to hold everyone accountable thank you thank you to the minister for that response I'm glad that the Ontario government presented realistic measures to end the ongoing issue of missing and murdered Aboriginal women and girls we have to collaborate with our community leaders and brothers to develop long term community building initiatives poverty reduction employment opportunities safety and policing and public education to name a few for the last six months I've worked with the Native Women's Association of Canada's Faceless Dolls project in my community of Kingston and the Islands to highlight the plight of the nearly 1200 missing and murdered Aboriginal women and girls in Canada my visits with the Aboriginal community and the Indigenous organizations were emotional experiences in the absence of strong federal leadership we must continue to lead the way in raising awareness of this grave issue Mr. Speaker through you to the minister what were some of the outcomes from the national round table this past Friday thank you minister sir Aboriginal first sir of Aboriginal first the round table was a tremendous opportunity to hear from Aboriginal organizations and the families of the missing and murdered Indigenous women with the presence of three ministers myself minister McCharles minister Nakvee led by her Premier Ontario had a very very strong voice at that round table as the minister from Kingston as the member from Kingston highlighted we need awareness that is the one consensus that all of the attendees at the round table agreed upon a pan Canadian prevention and awareness campaign this will build on existing initiatives and focus on changing the perception and attitudes on this issue of missing Indigenous women and girls but despite the comments by the federal minister Leitch this is not just a local issue of a local individual crime it's a broader issue it has to be dealt with in a broader concept and the federal government can do much much more on this issue thank you speaker no question the member from first thank you speaker my question is for the Premier can the Premier tell us that of a time in the history of the province where the government including the Premier's own senior staff has been under four separate OPP investigations another record see you Premier Mr. Speaker again let me just say to the member opposite what I have said repeatedly Mr. Speaker I have been clear about my position I made a public statement Mr. Speaker and I will work with the authorities but the investigation is taking place outside of this house by the authorities Mr. Speaker it is not taking place in here in the legislature and I will continue to work with them thank you Speaker this is clearly is a clear lack of integrity and accountability political points should never trump clearly the government with its four ongoing OPP investigations believes differently Premier will you take the first step to rebuilding trust and demand that those who created this mess step down from their public duties thank you Premier again Mr. Speaker I have been clear I have been clear about exactly what my position is I have made that statement publicly and I know the member opposite can access that it is in the public realm but the the the deputy house leader is warned please finish Premier just to say Mr. Speaker that I take it very seriously and I will work with the authorities outside of this house where the investigation is taking place thank you Mr. Speaker my question is to the Premier did the Premier abide by her own party's constitution to the constituency association and the nomination president as soon as she made her decision as soon as she made her decision to appoint Glen Tebow that given I have been given serious consideration in listening very carefully to all of the questions and in most cases the members have been able to pull everything back to government policy that is getting dangerous and close to having no contact and I advise the member to make his question adhere to pulling it into government policy carry on Premier thank you very much Mr. Speaker and as I have said repeatedly this morning there are questions that will be asked as part of an investigation that investigation is taking place outside of this house Mr. Speaker and it is being undertaken by authorities and I will work with the authorities outside of this house Mr. Speaker thank you Mr. Speaker yes Premier we too are anxious for the criminal trial to start however it doesn't preclude you from actually answering some very basic questions Mr. Speaker if the Premier sent a letter that would back up her version of the story why is she refusing stop the clock please order please order please order please and I know I'm on the right track when I get accused by one side asking these people to be quiet and then on this side asking these people to be quiet when they themselves make noise well they're answering so I will do my best in this chair and I don't need the arm chairs please finish Mr. Speaker if the Premier sent a letter that would back up her version of the story why is she refusing to release it is it because it actually doesn't exist the many differences between the NDP and the Ontario Liberal Party many many differences one of those is that we have a very clear process whereby the leader of the party is entitled to exercise her right to appoint candidates in stark contrast the NDP chooses to use other tactics when they have a preferred candidate they do not have that clarity that we have in the Ontario Liberal Party which is why we have seen the disgraceful contact in Scarborough Guildwood where long time members of the New Democratic Party have been forced to leave the party have been forced to leave the party because their wishes have been turned on by the leader of the NDP so I do believe that Amarjeet Karshabra Thank you that's fine New question to members from Ottawa Thank you Mr. President my question is for the Associate Minister of Health and Long-Term Care Mr. Speaker I know that the parents and the youth in Ottawa have been advocating for this bill and I'm proud that this morning we're joined by a group of passionate Ontario youths who are here to support Swift Passage of Bill 45 the Making Outer Choices Act as a part of this proposed legislation our government is taking strong action to protect youth from the dangers of tobacco we know that flavored tobacco products are designed to appeal to youth and then we know that research that almost half of the 121 600 Ontario youths in grade 9 to 12 who have reported using tobacco product in the last 30 days have turned to flavored tobacco the facts are here Speaker could the minister please remind the House that we are proposing what we are proposing to do to protect our children from flavored tobacco Thank you Associate Minister Long-Term Care I'd like to begin by thanking the member from Ottawa Orleans for this really important question Speaker to tell you the truth I was hoping that this question would come from the member from Nickel Belt who spent a considerable time earlier this morning talking about how important this bill is to her but alas it's not important enough but I do thank the member for her question and yes she is right and earlier this morning Speaker as you know I was pleased to meet with some of these dedicated young advocates they offered advice and more importantly their support to get this bill passed and I'm delighted to see so many young people who share our commitment to drive down smoking rates Speaker as we know the research shows that flavored tobacco is a gateway for young people to become smokers with flavors like strawberry, watermelon and bubble gum the tobacco companies are targeting young people with this marketing and this bill is all about making sure that next generation of smokers don't begin to smoke Thank you Mr. Speaker and again my question is for the Associate Minister of Health and Long-Term Care Minister as you know e-cigarettes use as an emerging trend in Ontario including among our youth we have seen a great deal of concern raised by local and international media and the medical community about the possible health effects of hazards of e-cigarettes use in a recent national survey it was found that 20% of youth aged 15 to 19 had tried e-cigarettes that means 417,000 teenagers in that age group have tried e-cigarettes it is important that our government safeguard youth from an unregulated device that could have negative effects on their health Mr. Speaker could the minister please remind what action she is taking to protect our youth from the possible health effects of e-cigarettes Thank you Thank you Speaker and thanks again to the member for that very important question our new technology and it's the Wild West frankly Speaker when it comes to where you can wait and who can purchase e-cigarettes and that is why we have proposed legislation that would if past ban retailers from selling e-cigarettes to youth and restrict vaping in public places in this way we are proposing to protect young Ontarians from any harm that may be associated with electronic cigarettes Speaker the young people today very clearly that they want us to help protect them and to make sure that the next generation of vapors doesn't get started Thank you Thank you very much Mr. Speaker my question is the Premier Premier you continue to put partisanship over partnership Idealogy over evidence The evidence from independent officers indicates that there has been a contravention of the law The members of the opposition side of this house have written to the OPP supporting their investigations Premier when will you demonstrate the integrity expected of your office Well Speaker I think the Premier is exactly showing the respect and integrity that the independent process should have by not interfering in that process and the members opposites continue to insist that somehow the Premier should intervene in the process and come out with some sort of an outcome that they would prefer Well Speaker I think we all know that's not how the system works it's arms land it's separate from the government those systems have been put in place for a reason we should respect that like I said again I agree with the member from Leeds Granville when he said on Friday the QP briefing that there's a process that's going on the government should not interfere in their process and he said I could let it run its course he's absolutely right Speaker we should let the process continue because it is designed to be and respect the outcome this is not the place to try a case or undertake an investigation because that's the responsibility of the police and our judges and we respect them 100% Speaker Thank you Thank you Mr. Speaker again back to the Premier this is a bit like Groundhog Day you are allowed to give answers in this highest of the question Premier you have said and I quote anything that was offered in exchange end of quote anything may be defined by you as a written contract but the law says otherwise no matter what the title no matter what their authority your staff did your bidding by offering a position to Andrew Olivier Premier how much longer will you defy the integrity of this office your office Sir with all your respect the role of the government is to make sure that we respect the law and we let the independent authorities do its work and by by asking to interfere in the matter you are advising the government to do the contrary I would advise to you that we follow the process we let the police do its work we let the elections Ontario do its work we let the prosecutor do its work because that's how the process is done that's how the process works well and let's focus on issues that are important to Ontarians like building public infrastructure like making sure they were guaranteeing retirement for Ontarians that is the mandate that they have given to this legislature that is the mandate they have given to this government we're going to remain focused on those important issues and make sure that the retirement security and the good infrastructure that is so necessary for this province is there for generations to come Thank you Your question My question is of the Premier you keep on insisting that you decided in order to appoint Mr. Tebow in November of last year clearly your constitution says that you have to send a letter in order to be able to do that officially through the Liberal Party mechanism the question we're asking you is when did you send that letter to both the Liberal Party and to the Writing Association president and forming of the decision that you're going to appoint your candidate Mr. Tebow Thank you very much I remind the member opposite again as he is well aware that there is an independent process that is ongoing and it's up to that process to determine the answers to all these questions and make a judgment we know elections Ontario has clearly said that they are the election Ontario officer is not making any judgment he's leaving it up to the prosecutors to decide so the matter has been referred to public service public prosecutor service of Canada they will undertake their due diligence as required by law for them and make a determination and then we will respect that I don't think this is the place speaker to get into all that their work which is very much within their purview I urge all the member to re-focus on issues that are important issues that our constituent are speaking to us every single day such as time and income security Thank you speaker My question is again to the premier the premier has repeatedly said that she decided she was going to appoint her candidate back in November there is a process under the liberal constitution that says that she has to send a letter to the writing association president and to the election commissioner of the liberal community when did you send that letter to both the writing association president and the liberal party when did you sign that letter Thank you very much speaker I think we all see what the third party is doing they are trying to distract from their sorted record on progressive policies that have been implemented by this government in this process when the third party comes to speaker putting forward the most progressive budget ever in the history of this college under the leadership of our premier where was the third party they are forcing unnecessary elections what was the result of their elections there was a liberal majority government re-elected in this house they still have not forgiven themselves for making their wrong headed decision and they still continue on to vote against one of the most progressive budgets and that is why speaker they don't want to talk about everything else they don't want to talk about affordable housing they are reinvesting in they don't want to talk about raising minimum wage and indexing it to cost of living which this government brought in and they disagreed with speaker they don't want to talk about the support for the development Thank you Mr. Speaker my question is to the minister of Ministry of Affairs and Housing Minister this past Friday you and I celebrated the 10th anniversary of the Green Bell this milestone provide an opportunity to reflect on the Green Bell the role the Green Bell plays in protecting Ontario's most valuable agriculture and environmental sensitive land 10 years ago our government sent a powerful message by creating the Green Bell plan which designates the Oak Ridge Marine, the Niagara escarpment and much of a cherished countryside as protected from development the government told all Ontarians that we must not take Ontario's natural beauty an important farmland for granted Minister as we celebrate this important anniversary of the Green Bell please remind us of why we can be proud of this world class model of land preservation Thank you I'm proud to be able to get up to declare why we're proud about the Green Bell the largest Green Bell in the world larger than the size of Prince Edward Island protecting farmland protecting wetlands coordinating growth you know it is part of a comprehensive plan our government has set out over the last decade and I think it's great to be able to say happy anniversary of Green Bell Mr. Speaker Thank you Minister I understand that as part of your mandate as Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing the Premier has directed you to lead a review of the Green Bell plan in coordination with reviews of the growth plan the Oak Ridge Marine plan and the Niagara escarpment plan Minister these reviews are an exciting opportunity to build on the plans plan successes to date and to identify opportunities to improve the plans we are needed you are required to consult with each municipality that has jurisdiction in the Green Bell and to ensure the public is given an opportunity to provide input Minister what details can you share about these coordinated reviews Thank you Minister Well Mr. Speaker I want to thank the honourable member from Durham for his question and his wonderful supplementary we announced on Friday the establishment of a panel set up by the honourable David Cromby by the way who will be heading that an inspired choice according to the Caledon beaver will be working with the Ministry of Natural Resources holding meetings across the province Mr. Speaker to review the four plans it will be comprehensive it will be coordinated and in the words of David Cromby will be a historic undertaking of monumental importance Thank you The member for Nickelbelt on a point of order Thank you Speaker I just wanted to know that everybody got a little thank you note this morning to thanks them for supporting freeze the industry a group of youth who wants to support bill 45 and there are mints in there so remember mental Thank you It's actually not a point of order but thank you We have deferred votes on the motion of concurrence in supplying the following ministries and offices Tourism, Culture, Sport, Infrastructure, Transportation, Community, Social Services Energy, Finance, Health Long Term Care, Aboriginal Affairs Francophone Affairs and Consumer Services Calling the members this will be a five minute bill Would all members please take their seats Ms. Sandel has moved the motion of concurrence in supply of the ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport All those in favour please rise one at a time to be recognized by the clerk Mr. Nackley Mr. Bradley Mr. Shirelli Mr. Sousa Ms. Matthews Mr. Hoskins Ms. Sandel Mr. Dugan Mr. McCharles Mr. Quinter Mr. McMeakin Mr. Murray Mr. Chan Mr. Morridi Mr. Coteau Mr. Flinn Mr. Zimmer Mr. Delaney Mr. Dixon Mr. Crack Mr. Hunter Mr. Sergio Mr. Jassek Mr. Del Ducca Mr. Fraser Mr. Anderson Mr. Baker Mr. Ballard Mr. Kuala Ms. Mollie Ms. Martens Ms. McGarry Mr. Milch Mr. Pott Mr. Renaldi Mr. Tebow All those in favour please rise one at a time to be recognized by the clerk Mr. Rarnock Mr. Hardiman Mr. Wilson Mr. Fidelli Mr. Clark Mr. Miller Mr. Thompson Mr. Barris Mr. Monroe Mr. Scott Mr. Hillier Mr. Walker Mr. Smith Mr. Harris Mr. Nell Mr. Petipis Mr. Horvath Mr. Vantos Mr. De Novo Mr. Tabas Mr. Miller Hamilton Mr. Sattler Mr. Natascha Mr. Armstrong Mr. Singh Mr. Mantha Mr. Hatfield Mr. Gates Mr. Janie Mr. Amin Mr. Ray Mr. Malar Mr. Ram Then Mr. Harry Mr. Sam Mr. Nez Mr. Keros Mr. Keros Mr. Ham Mr. Nell Mr. Keros Mr. Nell vote? Same vote. The ayes are 58 the nays are 42. The ayes being 58 the nays being 42 I declare the motion carried. Madam Mayor has moved concurrence and supply of the ministry of community social services all those in favor please rise. Same vote agreed. The ayes are 58 the nays are 42. The ayes being 58 and the nays being 42 I declare the motion carried. Madam Mayor has moved concurrence and supply of the ministry of energy all those in favor please second vote. Same vote. The ayes are 58 the nays are 42. The ayes being 58 and the nays being 42 I declare the motion carried. Madam Mayor has moved concurresh and supply of the ministry of finance, all those in favor please rise. Same vote. Agree. Same vote. The ayes are 58 the nays are 42 The ayes being 58 and the nays being 42 I declare the motion carried. Mr. Flynn has moved concurcence the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. All those in favour? Same vote? Agreed. Same vote. The ayes are 58, the nays are 42. The ayes being 58, the nays being 42, I declare the motion carried. Mr. Flynn has moved concurrences to the supply of the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs. All those in favour? Same vote? Same vote. Agreed. The ayes are 58, the nays are 42. The ayes being 58, the nays being 42, I declare the motion carried. Mr. Flynn has moved concurrences to supply the Office of Francophone Affairs. All those in favour? Same vote? Same vote. Agreed. The ayes are 58, the nays are 42. The ayes being 58, the nays being 42, I declare the motion carried. Mr. Flynn has moved concurrences to supply the Ministry of Consumer Services. Same vote? Same vote. Agreed. The ayes are 58, the nays are 42. The ayes being 58, the nays being 42, I declare the motion carried. There are no further deferred votes. This House stands recess until 3 p.m. this afternoon. Sorry, I was in the dismissal.


at yeah okay so do you see that my dogma is based on a lifetime of study and treating thousands of people from fat old ladies to yogis and meditators to the best athletes in the world with world records and and taking people out of medical retirement and hard evidence that my techniques work undeniable on many many letters and books and you know read laird hamilton's book he talks about my work with him right in there um and many others so uh i am dogmatic about that which must be kept pure like uh drinking half your body weight and ounces of water and realizing the best solution for pollution is dilution and waters nature's chief solvent is is something you can't get around you know if you want to party good party but eat good food and drink good water so that the party doesn't kill you or you don't get to party more you get to party less so if you want to party let's do it right and let's get clear on what you need to be dogmatic about money to friday so you can enjoy the weekend right so a dogma actually has a very specific function of stabilizing concepts ideas or energetic structures that need to be in place you could say carpenters are dogmatic about having a good foundation well anybody that says you don't need a foundation is either living in a bubble theoretically or literally or a shitty house or they don't know why they why their doors don't fit and their windows don't fit but they got a million dollar chandelier hanging over their dinner table right but they got uh cheese whiz as a foundation on their house so i am dogmatic about what is important to be dogmatic about and when it comes to assessing people's bodies and designing exercise programs properly and assessing what's wrong in people's lives there are certain necessary steps and if they're missed no matter what you fantasize you're missing essentials and basics are basics because they have to be adhered to and when you look at ufc fighters and the best boxers in the world and the best athletes in the world in interviews after they've won the championship or the world record or the medal how many times have you heard them say i stuck to the basics yeah every time right the greatest fighters always say i stuck to the basics they didn't say oh i learned the double twisted dog fucker and practice that until i could impress everybody i need to do that it's level figure that one out level four they say i drilled the basics when i was a boxer on the army boxing team we used to spend hours till your arms were dying doing the theme same thing you do in a beginning boxing class with the best fighters in the world jab they've called out numbers one jab two one two one two three one two three four and we did this information for hours unlike it's like the old saying the young kid says i goes to a martial arts master he says i want to become a badass and the master says okay fine today we're going to begin with the front snap kick he teaches him a front snap kick and he says i want you to do a hundred of those he does a hundred he waits and waits and waits the master comes and the master says how'd it go he said good let me look okay you need to do some more another hundred well he does this about five times then the next day the kid comes back he does the same thing the third day the kid says to the master i said can we do something else i'm just sick and tired of these front snap kicks the master says no a hundred front snap kicks i'll be back in a while and the kid says well this is just bullshit i'm not learning anything and the master grabs him by the neck stuffs his head in the fountain and waits till he's about to drown pulls his head out of the fountain and says when you're as hungry to learn as you are for air come back i think that was mr miyagi who i don't think mr i was that aggressive wasn't it bruce lee that said i don't fear the man that knows three thousand kicks i fear the man that knows one kick three thousand different ways or something like that or bruce lee said i do not fear the man who's tried a thousand kicks once i fear the man who's done one kick a thousand times that's the one right there very good so that's a dogma that what is he saying you must do something ten thousand times to be a master of it and if you're not then you don't have a good dogma as a foundation so you know how to throw 48 different kicks but you don't have subconscious mastery of them and when someone's moving faster than your nervous system can process if you don't have unconscious mastery then you can only react consciously well i got news for you you don't have time a good fighter will hit you three times before that impulse gets from your brain to your hands now knowing that and and explaining that very well how do you not become dogmatic or so attached to that dogma where uh you know you allow yourself to have a cheeseburger and a french fire every once in a while because you're not so you know hell bent on everything has to be this how do you allow flexibility or what does that look like to you well what do you explain that well that that really really goes to what it means to be a healthy person and um if a dogma is stopping you from living and being creative and playful then you are losing the essence of life itself so everything becomes outcome oriented i have to do this everything's a squared plus b squared equals c squared and there's no uh creative impulse in there there's no everything's always trying to become work toward an objective but it takes all the awareness away from the process and life is a process life is not an outcome it's a process so if a person uh needs the freedom of eating donuts once in a while and the stress of not eating the donuts is actually more detrimental to their overall psychology and physiology than the stress of eating donuts within a range of manageability then i say eat the donuts but when the donuts are actually stopping you from accomplishing your dreams goals and objectives then it's no longer a functional dogma or it's no longer even functional play it's now um some form of distraction some form of addiction or some form of medication in other words what was playful now becomes some sort of medication and then you always have to look for what is it that they're medicating and that's where the deep work that i teach the more advanced practitioners comes in because that really all behaviors are the expressions of beliefs so you have to get to the beliefs so when in other words when someone's using things for reward and play to the degree that it's stopping them from achieving their objective it's no longer reward or play it's a delusion so my philosophy is you can do anything you want and a healthy person is not someone who has a perfect body or a perfect skin or any idea like that a healthy person is someone who realizes that the way they manage themselves either increases their ability to engage life and create meaningful relationships and meaningful outcomes in their pursuits or it's getting in the way of them so if drinking a glass of wine at night makes you feel rewarded for your day and and gives you a little loosening and a little sense of freedom or smoking a joint that's good but if it gets to the point where you're smoking joints and drinking wine for breakfast and your body starting to fall apart and your dick doesn't work or your your sex drive is gone or you know any of the things that are meaningful to make life go now you've you're not healthy anymore I feel like you've seen a lot of non-working dicks well you know if you look well that's party I mean I think that's a sign man it's a sign of health it's a sign of sympathetic stress it's sympathetic overload it's a key indicator that a male is under too much stress a woman loses her sex drive so her she doesn't have a dick to stand up but uh if a male is under too much stress it shuts down the reproductive system as a coping mechanism because why would you want to reproduce another living organism in an environment where the parent organism cannot survive I literally just talked about this the only thing that'll affect my libido is poorly is stress the only thing yeah everything else is no problem I connected that you know for sure once I hit my 30s I totally noticed that in fact it's something that I know if I ever noticed that in our relationship I always tell Katrina like take me away it's time for a vacation we need to get away it's not working I need to de-stress I know I know that and I can I can feel it I can sense it and that's something that I make sure that I get away and do that reset you know well I have to say Paul you're easily one of the most interesting people that we've interviewed and that I've met and I know we have a lot of listeners who are like it just like I thought very polarizing we're gonna have listeners that are going to be like oh my god great information awesome he gets it and we're gonna have listeners that are gonna be like what is he talking about and I appreciate that I actually appreciate that quite a bit because it it's gonna spur conversation it's gonna spur debate we welcome it you know you have a lot of what you say especially in regards to things our resonates with us for sure well when especially in regards to exercise and nutrition is a lot of stuff that we've talked about on the show a lot of the other stuff that you go on is definitely beyond the scope of the some of the things we talk about but I found also very fascinating and thought provoking whether you know people agree or not I think it's important that we provoke thought debate and discussion with them people because that's where yeah where growth happens so it's been pleasure having you yeah thank you for letting us into your home we truly appreciate it my pleasure place and just to close you know people don't realize this but uh conflict is an important part of a healthy relationship like if we don't really explore each other's ideas and uh work on each other in order to make us demonstrate evidence that those ideas work then there is no legitimate growth right you know you you have to go test an idea to see if it works before you can have an honest opinion about it but if you don't test the idea and you think you have an honest opinion you don't have an honest opinion you have a fear-based dogma right if he's right then I'm wrong well what if you're both right what if what you're doing is right for you and what he's doing is right for him but until you talk about enough and experiment enough in other words open yourself to the natural conflict as long as the conflict is in the spirit of higher intelligence or or higher wisdom or growth and development but if the conflict is all about screw you you're wrong and I don't like you then you might as well just go back to the christian crusades and uh now we're back to the damaging kind of dogma you know so uh my only reason for saying that is I'd be excited if it stirs up a lot of controversy I'd excited if it people uh you know find themselves being triggered because using when we're triggered someone put their finger right on the on our growth potential excellent there you go well thanks we'll sign off with that listen if you like mine pump leave us a five star rating review on itunes if we like your review we pick it you'll get a free mind pump t-shirt also go to youtube check out mind pump tv we put out a new video every single day you can also find us on instagram at mine pump radio you can find me at mine pump sal adam at mine pump adam and justin at mine pump justin thank you for listening to mine pump if your goal is to build and shape your body dramatically improve your health and energy and maximize your overall performance check out our discounted rgb super bundle at mine pump media dot com the rgb super bundle includes maths anabolic maths performance and maths aesthetic nine months of phased expert exercise programming designed by sal adam and justin to systematically transform the way your body looks feels and performs with detailed workout blueprints and over 200 videos the rgb super bundle is like having sal adam and justin as your own personal trainers but at a fraction of the price the rgb super bundle has a full 30 day money back guarantee and you can get it now plus other valuable free resources at mine pump media dot com if you enjoy this show please share the love by leaving us a five star rating and review on itunes and by introducing mine pump to your friends and family we thank you for your support and until next time this is mine pump


Felly, rydyn nhw'n fawr am ddechrau, ac rydyn nhw'n rhaid i'w ddechrau, ac mae'n gwneud i'w ddechrau. Mae'n ddau'r ddau a'r ddau, ac mae'n ddau'r ddau, ac mae'n ddau rydyn ni'n ddau o'r sgolisiad ym Llyfrgell.  Diolch yn ymweld, yn y dyn nhw'n gweithio ar y cyfweld, rhaid i chi'n gweithio ar y cyfweld y Batholhaggymaint, o'r cyflwyngau o'r wyf yn y dystod o'r olyw. Felly ar y gweithio ar 1535, Yr Yr Senedd Cymru yn gfyrddiaeth yng Nghymru, CEO Thomas Cromwell, yn ddechrau ei cyfrifio i'r cyfrifio'r munisgrif. Mae'n meddwl i'r pryd yn fwy o bwysig ymlaen, a'r cyfrifio'n bwysig ymddiadol ar y cwmys. Mae'n meddwl i'r bwysig, felly mae'n widd ymddynt, yma yng Nghymru yn fwy o'r bwysig, mae'n meddwl i'r cyfrifio'r cyfrifio'r cyfrifio'r bwysig yn rhan ymddir. Mae'r currentu, ac mae'n brydgau iaith yn fwy o unrhyw yng nghael. Mae'r cydwyd yn cerddad ddifrwyddiol, ac mae'r fwy o, nafangeliaeth cyfan, mae'r ddiogel iaith yn ddifrwyddiol. Mae'r rhai yno i rheoli'r mater yna mae'n rhai fwy i ddoch. Mae rhai efo, mae'r cydwyddiol na'i tredu erioeddiol, mae'r credu y maen yr efodd. Mae'r sgwp yn rhaid i'r holl, mae'n rhaid i'r colli'r trefni, is one way of looking at it, but it's difficult to swear Leighton's damn new word with sources provided by the back up happy itself, including the one at which they own financial accounts. Those of the sacris which run from the late 40s century to the evil suppression to the sustained investment in the fabric of the church, and the contents of the festrus. Let's give you a few examples short of the order for Leighton to visit. ond Thomas boarderough was employed for 72 days to many estimates. An altercross, personal substantial sum of 8 pounds, was purchased from London. O'r moddym was also dispersed and prepared with calluses and candlesticks, patterns, sensors and the like. During the worksperth showed that patterns were exactly this sort of thing was everything to the spiritual health of Benedictine monasticism in Western England in the last century before suppression. I'd argue that the accounts of battle likewise speak of the sustained spiritual vitality of the monastery. The monks were taking care to invest in the vestments and all the virtues required for the performance of the liturgym, the dignified celebration of which was at the very heart of the Benedictine way of life. Now, the valuable evidence of the religious light of the monks of apple is provided by an unpolished inventory of 175 saint relics present at the monastery in the mid-15th century. And that's going to be the focus of my talk today. I'll explain how it's possible to determine how the abbey obtained at least some of the relics in the inventory. I'm just going to explain why there was this admissible relics in the royal collection that Jeremy was speaking about earlier. I'm widening a lot when we were probably at battle. Thank you for setting me up there, Jeremy. Evidence of battle's relationship with its royal founder William the Conqueror and how this relationship was sustained at least into the early 13th century. The inventory out significantly to our understanding of the spirituality of the monks was obviously the cult of saint relics, but also their religious self-identity. The also of the adm is liturgym, pilgrimage, the monastery's relationship with the wider English and the European church. And it also provides some gleaning, just gleaning, about the material reaches of the monastery. And this is especially important as there's virtually no surviving physical evidence in terms of play in such out from the monastery. So anyway, the inventory, it's now at the Huntsville Library of San Bernardino, California, where it's been since the early 20th century. And it covers the rectos and verses of the two folios, and the battle of the provenance is explicit. The ex-libers inscription on the top shows the inventory into the monastery's library during the time of Stephen John Newton, and he was elected in 1463, dying in 1490. And he then opens with the words and translation, these are the names of the saint whose relics are kept here in battle. Now, before his election to the embassy, Newton served as a monastery's salarer, and it appears that the inventory was of a fairly sad possession, or possibly even brought up by a predecessor. That's Thomas Bird, who occupied the office between 1436 and 1438, and whose signature is shown there, tended at 10. Now, the inventory is in Latin, and it's written in the neat book hand. Each page has two columns, each ruled with their 26 lines, and it appears that it worked a single stripe. It follows, at least to begin with, the standard Hierarchical Arrangement, found in all the El Rhaegon countries, so that they have the relics of Christ, followed by those of the Virgin, the Archangels, John the Baptist, the Apostles, Masters, Confessors and the Virgins. However, this convention breaks down around about there, and there after it becomes much less predictable, and the final third or so of the total don't have any discernible order, and I'll get some significance of that present day. There is quite an array of relics there of those of Christ's life and passion. There are portions of clothing of the Virgin and other saints. We have the hair and beard of various saints, including the Apostles of Peter Paul and Andrew. There are body parts, including the finger of some George, the arm of some Wolfram, the jaw and the 13 teeth of some Bridget, and a joint of some Giles, which, when I was originally transcribing, I thought, but is that a pictura? I thought, no, that's too weird. You can relate it to me. Now we also have the dust and flashes of some saints as well, and various bits of current background. Now, many of these relics can be found in most other English medieval lists, but there are some especially interesting old relics, which I'll comment on in the course of the talk. I'll get a little bit of context, as I'm sure you all know, Battle of Abbey was founded by William the Conqueror, the most prominent in 1070, as a penance of the bloodshed associate of the conquest, and also as a memorial to his great victory in 1066. Sources from the living memory of the battle made clear that it was founded on the very site where William the One is the great victory over Harold the last English that's contained. Now right played a very important part, a number of key events in the conquest and the early history of the monastery, and we just have time, I'll just step those on the ladder. According to the Abbeys, led 12th into Chronicle, rather, the Conqueror made a death plague of innumerable relics to battle, and these are described as coming from the treasury of the Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms. Now the parism of the Anglo-Saxon relics with a well-known royal owner does indeed suggest that it is plausible that many of the relics, the at-battle, would be given by a Conqueror. Exotic Theedra are an extensive collection of relics for the gift of King Atlus down in 930. Significantly, these events have been in the King's treasury, a contemporary document describing that these relics were, that the treasury contained the King's earthly treasure, and the most valuable treasure of all holy relics. An inventory of Atlus down's gift appears in the mistel of which we have referred, set 1050-72, shown here. There, indeed, quite a number of similarity between the battle and exorcists, at least 38 saint relics appear in both inventories. The pre-conquest of the monastery of Wartham, and the later room chair there, has an important collection of relics, many of the donation of King Harold. Again, there are affinities between the at-battle and the wartham list. I think there will be 25 relics at the present time of Harold's gift. And there are about 50 of these that are in common with the battle inventory. But I need to be careful here. It's the case with both the exorcist and the wartham lists, that those that are in common with the battle are of saints common in most of their many inventories. Those of nearly Roman martyrs and poets. It's quite striking the number of Frankish saints, actually. But we're on further ground when we get the later gift of royal relics to the Abbey. And Harold, in battle, be called in 1200 King John visiting the Abbey. He marked the occasion with a gift of a valuable vestment, and relics of the Lord Settled Cross, which is a brother King John that acquired Rome Crusade in the Holy Land. Now there is intense emotion to the Holy Sepulcher in Richard's Park. And of course he never reached the Jews in the Holy Places. The Crusade is something a few miles short at the Mount Jordan. But the near content of the Corinthian relics of the Covert Hall recalls Richard Ransom's and Saladin relics from the Holy Sepulcher and other churches in Jerusalem. Also that he acquired a portion of the True Cross. Now relics of the True Cross occur on two separate occasions at both times in Jefferson and the Sepulcher within the England trip. The first following well-established conventions at the beginning, but the second is towards the end in the section of the list that works uniquely a hierarchy. And it's plausible at least to suggest this entry may well be the gift of King John. I would say that, unlike a lot of unaborn relics, we don't want to be given a single one of these relics. Thank you very much John Newton for working through it out. Anyway, there are other relics in the England trip that can only have been acquired by the world after the death of Tom Croy. Closer to the end is a relic of the bone of the head of St Thomas, a cancer relic, obviously Thomas Beckett, murdered in Westminster's in the afternoon of the 20th around December 1170. Now there was a contemporary connection between after the Christchurch that could well explain the presence of this relic. Oh no, prior to Christchurch at the time of Beckett's assassination was elected after the England centre fine. He brought women to his new monastery a book describing the miracles attributed to Beckett. It isn't at all seeming reasonable to suggest that he was also the source of that was Christchurch's relic for the multi-larchbishop. This is especially believable as other moments present at the monastery at the time of the saint's murder played a key role in propagating his cult in disseminating his relics, especially to other than his fellowship to the universities. To continue the feme of later acquisitions five entries after Beckett is a relic of Richard Chichester in 1912-53 in canonised nine years later. Now the battle was in the dioceses of Chichester so which was very much a local boiler of the saint. And the relics of Beckett and Richard were not that uncommon. Indeed in many respects the battle of Englandry represented a typical English Benedictine Rath lecture. A hundred or so of the relics can be found in those of other English Benedictine houses. But despite this the Englandry provides a very interesting evidence concerning the religious identity and spirituality of Monarchs. Battles found in the community of Monarchs came from Monartier at war. And this is his greatest saint at cost, Martin, Roman soldier of Monarch and Bishop. And the battle was dedicated to this saint. The Abbey's Chronicle tells how during the reign of Abba Walter de Leyser at in 1371 the monastery glittered with frequent miracles so that the merits of Saint Martin might be declared raw. And he was clearly of lasting significance to the identity of the month. You can see his image because in the his cloak of the beggar in the canopy niche above the final actual canon there at the seal. And you won't be surprised to learn that there's a relic of Martin in the Englandry. It occurs on the second page, between relics of Gregory the Great, a possibly in English, in St Switham, a great English Anglo-Saxon Bishop of Winchester. So it's sandwiched between those of two important confessor saints. Battle had a dependent priorate of Exeter founded in 1087 and from the Abbey it had its own poor collection of relics. Now it was dedicated to St Nicholas for the centre of Bishop of Myra in Northern Turkey. And he was obviously a university venerated. Now these relics were translated into Bari into the Philippine of the 11th century and battle possessed with a number of magnificent relics. They occur on two separate occasions in the Englandry. The first is Natkin, Sapkloff, that occurred early on in other devotions from confessor saints.  And it can well be the case that these would have attained at the time of his translation. Indeed an animal from the Abbey recalls this event. Moreover, a life of Nicholas so that a detailed description of the translation could be written in verse 4 in a hand of around about 1100 to the same manuscript containing the animal. Now Bathab also had a salvat brechen which was now a brechen cathedral which was then dedicated to John the Evangelist. Now perhaps surprising there were no relics of John the Evangelist in the Englandry. However, the prior with Brechen is likely to have been the source of battles around of Saint Almeda, a 56th century Virgin Martha from Brechen. Further, the Bishop of St David between 1115 and 148 made personal grants to the prior of a chapel dedicated to the same. This chapel in very close proximity to the prior was a site of a holy well that according to the chronicle of Gerard of Wales was a focus of pilgrimage populations that the miraculous cules there were attributed to Almeda. Now several other early British saints also featured prominently in the Englandry including Samson and Petrock whose relics were numerous sites in Western England including the Englandry and Samson and Petrock 18th foundation. A battle also that possessed relics of some British saints that are not found in any other in the Englandrys. These include Deccanam or Welsh Missionary to Samson in the late 7th century and the core of this you described as an abbess in the list but a battle in nothing is known to Serza. And this presence is surely a threat to a strong link to Western Britain. Other saints attest a battle also links with other British Benedictine houses. Northern England and Samson saints, Adrian, Acre, Cufford, Woodford featured prominently in the rooms together. Now their relics appear in similar arrangement in several other British Benedictine in Englandry including both Canterbury houses and Durham people but a cwmniac Abbey of Reading was founded in 1120 by Henry I who made a generous effect of relics to the Samson foundation. They were invented in 1190s here. Battle of Reading would be owned in the British religious foundations to help the relics and Farrow, the 7th century Bishop of Mew, the clerics whose relics were translated in there in 1140. Likewise relics of Flavius, 6th century Archbishop Martyr of Rouen are only found in the only English that are founded of Battle of Reading. Now Reading was of course famous for its relics to the armors of James the Great and the great of all pilgrimage sites in Western Europe was this shrine of the stallion in northern Spain. Relics of the Saint were widespread appearing in happy two-thirds of English medieval inventories. But the number of relics of Saint James are battles quite striking. This is the other of the first folia where a fragment of his clothing part of his head the pillar of the form of James Martyr and a fragment of his tomb that's where you expect them with the apostles. James's relics appear on two other occasions in the inventory as well. The final one in the section that lacks a hierarchical arrangement possibly suggesting that the happy was continuing to acquire relics of this great saint. Indeed it's surely no coincidence that we know that Albert Allen kept him in battle and made the pilgrims in Santiago in 1331. And this may also explain why happy had a very large number of other spice sites some are unique to the mastery of England. These include the relics of a saint of Dominant to be described as an abber and this is surely Saint Dominant of Silos. He died in 1073 his body translated to the church of his monastery where it became the focus of a cult of pilgrimage. There's also a bonus of eulodius of Cordoba and that will also possess the relics of a saint share of the strivers of the Bishop. Now I struggle to identify where I have told Nixon's activists. They can possibly be identified as a Saint-Santio and I'm apologising by form into pronunciation as well. I don't know if that's a Saint-Santio of Funes, Benedictine Abbot of Lejara and the later Bishop of Calahora who was martyred in 1146, is relics sort of the focus of a veneration at Colton Pilgrimage. Now Pilgrimage was a rare treat for months later that long hours in the church singing the Divine Office the eight daily services that punctuate the mass of the day. So was there a relationship between the battle relics and the saint's honours in the happy daily liturgy? Well the analysis of this question is hampled by the poor survival of the terrible books from the monastery. Only a single volume of this type struck the reverie of around about 1,500 survives and even that's fragmentary at its calendar. However, the offices of saints is more or less intact and there are a total of 113 saints with offices of commemorations and you won't be surprised at the two feasts of Martin of 4th July 7th of November are both there with feasts of twelve elections, the very highest rating, so too the feasts of St Nicholas. However, for the most part there's a very discernible relationship between the relics and the feasts. There's an approximate 50-50 split and disappointingly or at least disappointingly for me none of the rare Spanish or British saints who relics of the having were apparently commemorated in the liturgy. But there is however some evidence that the veneration battle relics extended beyond the walls of the community. In the early 12th century a bishop of Chichester granted an indulgence to pilgrims who visited the battle to commemorate its relics. The miracles that occurred there during the rule of Abba Walter the Lacy in the mid-19th century were also said to have attracted pilgrims. And the sacrist accounts from the early 16th century recorded relations on the feasts of relics that's kept a battle and looking at the other feasts in the reverie at some point between the second and the fourth of May on seven separate occasions alone in the 1520s and the 1530s. And as the late 1532 a bequest was made in the territory of some benignness of battle the saint altar for popular focus with various offerings. So what of the Abba Ralph rule itself? According to the Abba's late 12th century chronicle Abba Ralph, the rule between 1771 and 1734 commissioned a thyrsry a wonderful work of gold and silver set with precious jewels to provide a suitable magnificent setting for the Abba's relics. Well the relics in the 15th century in the territory are described to be contained in a philatory made of gold and shiny gems and then that's about as much as we can say about unfortunately. I conclude where I ended I conclude where I ended I conclude where I ended I conclude where I ended with suppression of battle Herodwydd, a well-known scene from Fox's book of martyrs, where I can see the official view of the English Reformation but I hope this makes an out challenge that I have shown you during the spiritual material which is the battle the poor state of the vestry the longest dream of 1535 surely had nothing to do with the lack of investment by the monks it was probably the case that the community had hidden or sold their vestments to prevent them from falling into the hands of the royal commissioners and we know what this was happening that houses had crossed the rail but a lot of the relics that played to an important role in making history the monastery and had shaped its identity but as is well known it forms a purpose for targeting relics from what are in the description indeed some scholars have argued that a major motive for the suppression wasn't just the religious life actors within them but it was the monastery's roles of custodian and radicals battle's precious level veritory surely contributed to the over 2,000 ounces of the plate sent from the monastery when the army finally came down in 1538 to the king's jewel house at Tower and we didn't show any regard for the army's spiritual riches but he's surely treasured its material riches and that of other monasteries as well indeed to such an extent I can leave you with this rather than an uncollied image there are a beautiful 14th century incense boat and centre from possibly from around the army indeed from around the army it represents the sum total of English many more monastic plate that has survived thank you very much