Tämä luokaa lukkoa. Tämä video on kertokaa, miten menosti kulkkuslaitella. Moni kulkkuslaite on kurssilla, joka on nousee haastattu linkki- ja online-luokaleja. Tietysti, jos online-luokalien on koko maatita, jotta minun suuret haastaa pask Middle World modulesin tie. Välikö tuntuu ne monimu Province as well as you can? Kursse on laittanut as Eight Units. Kaun osa kษorda on hienosti laittamaan näin, Joten kun yhdessä lähtee, voidaan ensimmäinen ottaa lähteä videoita, joita olet tullut. Lähteä videoita myös on interaktiivisia taskia, joita voidaan yhdessä ja se yhdessä yhdessä on yhdessä. Ja kun tuntuu videoita, tai kun tuntuu videoita, voidaan myös tehdä yhdessä asioita, joita voidaan olla kompulsori tai optionalista. Yhdessä asioita on myös yhdessä asioita, joita olet tullut, kuten tai ei. Ja kun tuntuu asioita ja tehdä videoita 2 tai 3 päivänä, keskustelu on yhdessä yhdessä ottaa lähteä videoita. Joten yhdessä asioita on ensimmäinen ottaa lähteä ja tehdä yhdessä asioita, sitten otetaan yhdessä keskusteluun. Jotkut kysymykset, joita olet tullut, nämä materiaaleja voidaan kysyä online. Se on yhdessä asioita, joita kysyy yhdessä yhdessä asioita, otetaan yhdessä kommenttia materiaaleja tai kommenttiin jälkeen. Yhdessä asioita on yhdessä asioita, joita voidaan tehdä yhdessä asioita, kun asioi ottaa. Joten asioi on, että kun asioi ottaa, voidaan tehdä yhdessä asioita ja sitten asioi. Asioi saa yhdessä asioita, kun ottaa yhdessä asioita. Joten on yhdessä asioita, joita kysymykset on online. Yhdessä asioita voidaan tehdä yhdessä asioita, mutta yhdessä asioita. Jotta otetaan yhdessä asioita ja otetaan asioita, niin on aika yhdessä asioita ja kommenttiin jälkeen. Nämä asioita ja kommenttiin jälkeen saavat yhdessä asioita ja se fokusi suunnitelmaa materiaaleja yhdessä asioita. Joten jälkeen, jotta kommenttiin jälkeen, jotta otetaan yhdessä asioita, jotta yhdessä asioita on yhdessä asioita, jotta yhdessä asioita on yhdessä asioita, jotta yhdessä asioita on yhdessä asioita. Joten otetaan videomateriaaleja nyt, koska video player ja video interaktiivista ehkä on jotain, joka ei ole käyttänyt. Video player on tullut täällä, ja se on muutoksia käyttöä. Ensimmäisenä, kun haluat videossa, jos haluat missata jotain, niin on tuntuu, että haluat sinut ottaa 10 sekuntia. Jos haluat vain vain muutoksia, niin voit ottaa 20 tai 30 sekuntia. Joten haluat sinut ottaa vähän, jos haluat missata jotain. Jos haluat, että minä puhutaan niin lentävästi tai olen jälkeen niin voit ajatella toiminnan puolesta tässä kontrolassa. Ja finally, tämä kontrolassa tarvitaan sinulle täysin. Joten voit tehdä tätä suurin. Jos haluat sinut niin lentävästi, joten voit ottaa tuntuu. Jos haluat sinut niin lentävästi, niin voit tuntuu toiminnan puolesta tai 0,25 sekuntia. Olen aivan tuntuu videossa tuntuu toiminnan puolesta ja olen tuntuu paljon parempi kuin myöhemmin puolesta. Mutta se tuntuu tuntuu ensimmäisenä puolesta. Videoilla on myös kontrolassa ympäristöryhmä. Joten kun haluat tuntuu täysin ikon ja videossa tuntuu, tuntuu, että haluat sinut tuntuu. Tämä tuntuu tuntuu tuntuu tuntuu ja tuntuu tuntuu tuntuu videossa tuntuu. Joten haluat sinut tuntuu mitä olen tuntuu videossa tuntuu. There are different kinds of questions. Most are multiple choices, but there are also some open questions. Some questions require you to do a little bit of calculations to understand certain statistical concepts and so on. These tasks are indicated by circles here on the video timeline. If the circle is solid, that means that you have completed the task, if it's a hollow, then that means that there's a task that you have yet to complete. Completing these tasks will be automatically graded, so there's also always one correct answer to these assignments and then you will be scored and that scored partially influences your final grade for the course. Then we have the discussion forums. We have about 10 discussion forums for the course and this is the reason why we have so many is that you get to choose what you participate. The announcement forum is something that everybody is subscribed to and you cannot unsubscribe. So that is when I have something that I want to tell to everybody, I will post to the course announcements forum and that's only I can do postings there, so no student can post there. Then we have the discussion forums for the units. So every unit has a discussion forum, then the discussion forum opens a few days after the unit has started and your task is to write something. So you have to post something to the forum to pass the unit. Then everybody is automatically subscribed but if you think that you don't want to discuss unit to issues anymore, you can unsubscribe. The unsubscribing from a forum means that you will no longer get email alerts when someone posts to the forum. You can still view the forum on the website. You will just not get any notifications anymore. We have quite a few people on the course so the email volume can get a bit high at some points. So you may want to unsubscribe at some point. You can always resubscribe if you want to. Then we have general discussion forum. So this is a forum if you have any questions that are not specific to any unit. For example, you are considering which statistical software you want to use for a data analysis assignment. That kind of questions you can ask here and everyone is allowed to comment. So I think using Stata is a good option for this course. Some students disagree and then we have that kind of discussions. There are always multiple perspectives to many issues that you could consider and this is a place for that kind of discussions. Then we have a special forum for data analysis assignments. And this forum is for questions about technical issues in data analysis. So if you are doing a data analysis assignment that you get an error message from your statistical software, then this is the place to post that question. By default, nobody subscribes to the forum because usually these postings that explain a data analysis problem are fairly specific to individual users. So for example, if you get an error code, it's quite likely that no one else has gotten the same error code. So only subscribe to this forum if you're interested in technical troubleshooting of your statistical analysis and you can then unsubscribe. Of course, if you want to read that kind of discussion to learn, you can do that. Subscribe to this right away but I think this is not something that most students want to be reading all the time. You can opt out from any forums. How you opt out and opt in is that each forum has this gear icon up here and then you can unsubscribe or subscribe to a forum. All the forums are subscriberable except the announcements, which is something that you must be subscribed to when you're participating in the course because I need a way to contact everybody. So the subscription options are available here. Then there's also a Moodle level setting for getting emails as digest which means that you only get one email per day which lists all the activities that have been going on that day. So instead of getting every time an email, every time when somebody posts this on the forum, you will get an email containing posts for that day that you can read at the end of the day. So it's up to you how you want to do it. The course has some assignments and we have a plagiarism policy that is strictly enforced. Typically, you will need to read you. Many students will need to read you our work because of plagiarism. This is fairly strict and it's important that we're strict because when you write research papers, if you plagiarized anything, then you will get caught because journals use the same system that we do. And if you get caught copying somebody else's text, then your manuscript is going to be discrejected regardless of how good the actual research is. So you're wasting your time if you don't learn how to write in your own works. There are the assignments. We have the written assignments are about reading material, understanding the material and explaining how you understood the material. I'm not interested in knowing whether you can find a certain quote from materials or whether you can identify a section about, let's say, reliability in a material and then paraphrase that section. I want to know how you understood the material. So read the material, you form an understanding, you put the material away, then you write your understanding to your document that you then submit. I will give you feedback. So everybody will get personal feedback and comments. So take your time to do that assignment so you will get better feedback. If you spend two hours doing an assignment that is supposed to take a day and a half, then probably there is not much for me to comment because either you have been just paraphrasing and then my comment is that you're paraphrasing. I cannot comment on your understanding or you just don't have the time to do it unless you paraphrase, if you don't reserve at least a day for each assignment. The plagiarism policy we use turn it in. I'll demonstrate the system on the next slide. And when you credit sources, you should be using American Psychological Association style for crediting sources or something very similar to that. The idea is that when you quote something, then you use quotation marks, you add a citation and then you add a page number after the quote. So can either of your readers can identify from where that quote came from. Any non trivial violations of plagiarism policy will need to be read on twice. So if you are caught plagiarizing something, then you need to resubmit the assignment twice. The first version will be one where you write the part that you copied in your own words. So how did you understand the part that you copied? And the second part is that you submit the original assignment and then you mark every copied part with quotation marks and then the appropriate citation to the source, including the page number. So both quoting and explaining in your own words are useful skills in writing, so we practice them if that's not clear for you. And you may need to redo this a couple of times until you get it right. So it's very important because the main output of academic researchers is your writing. So unless you can write in your own words and use sources appropriately, you are not very far in the skill of becoming a good researcher. Let's take a look at the feedback and the plagiarism detection system. When you submit something, it goes to turn it in. And this is the submission in box. This is my model answer and I have a similarity score of 32%. This actually percentage is not something that I look at very strictly, but 30% copied text is a lot. So that indicates that there is a problem. It's not solid evidence of a problem. I will show you what solid evidence of a problem next. But it indicates that if this person is high, if it's more than 10%, then if there's another good reason for it, then you could be in trouble. Of course, if you submit an assignment that contains two pages of your own text and then you give the assignment description on the first page, which you copy, that's completely okay, then you will get a similarity score of 32%, because one of the three papers is copied. This pencil icon here, when it's blue, it means that there are comments available for you. When you click on that, you can access the instructor's comments. And this is how the document looks like when you access the comments. So this is to turn it in a student's user interface, where you get to by clicking the pencil icon. We have text here, and you can see that this text mark, red, has been plagiarized. And then there is, on the right-hand side, there is a text field, where I have given some comments for you. Then there are also other kinds of comments that I'll show on the next slide, but this is like a general explanation of why I liked your assignment, why I didn't, or what kind of problems you have, or why you failed. So this is plagiarism, and it's directly copied from the book. The assignment was to explain what is reliability, and this is directly copied from singleton as traits. You will get caught doing that, and you're going to be failed. Then you have to redo. This is not technically plagiarism, so you can quote an explanation from the book, but this will still be either failed on one point, because you are not really explaining how you understood the concept of reliability. You are just copying text from the book, so this is not answering the question. This is slightly better, but not by much. This paraphrasing will not fail you.  So this will be one point out of five, and paraphrasing means that you are not copying directly, but instead you take the text from the book, and then you just write over it the same text using your own words. So you can see that there is stability and consistency here. We are stability and consistency here, and then it's basically the same explanation. Some in some of different words. Instead of paraphrasing or telling me what the book says, tell me how you understood the concept instead. So these are all three are bad answers. Now let's take a look at what our two good answers look like. So these two answers are good. So this is an answer. I just wrote how I understand the concept for reliability without looking at any references. So this will get you three or four points. So it's either average or above average, depending on how well you explain it. And to get five points, you have to explain and you have to do reflection. So this is an explanation with reflection. So what's the difference between this answer and the previous answer is that the previous answer only explains how you understood reliability without using the sources. This explanation here uses two sources. So the explanation has something about singleton strates. Singleton strates know that reliability is a prerequisite for validity. And then there is a citation to or you say that in the videos that you watched, I disagree. So I don't think that you need reliability for validity. Then what's your take on it? So there is contradiction within the materials. And then you explain, okay, so how do you interpret the contradiction? There are lots of contradictions in the materials. So there are some issues with the multiple sides and there can be two sides that both are generally correct in a different way. And there are sometimes mistakes in the material.  This screen also demonstrates the comments that I give you. So I can give you, besides this one overall set of comments, I can give you specific comments for specific parts. And these labels here simply are marking that you did that part correctly. And here I have highlighted one part with yellow. I know that it's a good observation with that kind of tag. And the speech bubble here indicates that when you click on it, you will get a more detailed explanation of why I think this is a very good observation to do. So that's what you get on the feedback that you get. Typically when you submit a written assignment, then I grade them the next day and I will try to have the comments available for you before the in-person seminar. So if the in-person seminar is on Wednesday, then if you submit on Monday night, my grading day is on Tuesday, so you can read the comments either on the break of the seminar or in the morning before the seminar or late Tuesday night. So I try to give you feedback. If you don't stick to my schedule, then you will not get a timely feedback. If you don't submit by my grading day, then when I will grade you next time, could be my next grading day or the day after, depending on how busy I am on the grading day, because I always prioritized those students that submit on time. The in-person seminars differ a bit from normal lectures. So normally the lecturer comes in with a set of slides and it's mostly the lecturer who speaks. In this course, I try to get the students to speak as much as possible. I do have the slides for the unit with me, so we can go through some of the parts that you found difficult to understand. I also have some additional slides that demonstrate concepts in an in-class assignment. So we can do all kinds of tests of whether you fall into some of the traps of how, for example, p-values are commonly misunderstood. But the idea is that when you watch the lectures in advance, we have more time for questions, we have more time for discussion, we have more time for reflection. These seminars are structured in a way that I have a schedule that we can follow. So if you have no questions, then we follow my schedule using the assignments that I have prepared. If you have lots of questions, then we'll let your questions drive the session. Because the questions that you have are probably more important for you than the assignments that I have prepared. Also when we have the forum discussions, then sometimes the forum discussion tends to get complicated, then I may say, okay, let's continue this discussion in the in-person seminar. So the forums are kind of like a lead-in to the in-person seminars. We start discussing in the forums, and then we conclude in the in-person seminar. The seminars are graded also, like everything in this course is graded. So we have low stakes grading. There are more than 100 great elements, and then a weighted average will be your final grade. When you come to that seminar, you get a grade of two.  And if you participate the discussion actively, you get a grade of four or five. By actively, I mean not only quantity of comments, but also quality of comments. So if you just ask a lot of stupid questions all the time, then I will ask you to please give some other people time to speak. But if you have very high quality, very thoughtful questions and comments, then you can get a five, even if you're not the person who is most using their voice. Credits and grading, they are exact way you get credits depends on the university, and that's explained on the forum. The amount of credits for this course varies between three and six. You have mandatory parts. When you complete all mandatory parts, then you will get three credits. Mandatory parts include the pre-exam, the video lectures, reading and written assignments, one, five and seven, data analysis assignment one, and learning diary. The learning diary is something that you can work either during the course or after the course. It contains about 20 questions, and those 20 questions are there to help you to check if you have understood the content of the course. So for each question, it's like a small essay, so you answer one or two paragraphs, and then the entire learning diary could be 10, 12 pages long, and then you submit at the end of the course, and then I will check if you have understood the course concepts correctly. So that's the mandatory part. Then the optional part, I have written readings and written materials for you, I have four additional things that you can do, and then I have two data analysis assignments that are optional that you can do. These give you half a credit each, and then the number of credits will be rounded down.  Then we have computer sessions. These are not created, so computer sessions are something where you just come in and you work on the data analysis assignment. You ask questions. You can of course come in and ask questions about other course things as well. So I'll be there. There is no structured content, except for a couple of small things in the very beginning to get you started. It's more like a place for you to work and ask questions. All the assignments are instructed by using screencasts. So you can take the screencast that explains how to do the analysis. When you have problems, then you raise your hand, and then I will come and help you in the computer class. The course has completion tracking. So whenever you are working on a unit, you see these boxes here. So the box is something that receives a check once you have completed the assignment. For example, in the unit discussion forums, when you have posted something to the forum, then that forum will be checked for you. The overall completion is tracked here, and this is initially blue, if you are late in doing some of the mandatory parts, it turns red.  So green ideal is when the course is done in a couple of months, then this bar should be all green for you. The workload for the course is a bit non-ideal. So this is a not good investment for credits. If you do it all, the six credit version, you are going to be working about 300 hours. So this is calculated based on a model that's used in Finnish universities. So that's the amount of work. In practice, in the past when I have given this course as a traditional course without the online elements, the students who have completed the full six credit versions, they typically say that it takes about two days per week to do the course for the duration of the course. Of course, if you don't do all the assignments, then it takes less, but reserve at least one day per week for the course, and otherwise, you're going to be in a hurry, and then you fall behind, and then it's going to be difficult to follow the discussions online and in the seminars. Your grade is going to be weighted average of these different elements. The pre-exam is 10%, assignments is 40%, participation is 30%, including online participation, the videos and the seminars, and the learning diary is 20%. So the pre-exam is not weighted heavily, because the idea is that I would just want to have everyone to start on the same level roughly, because there's very large variation in your backgrounds when you come to the course. The grades, you can follow how you're doing on the course by using the grade book. So the link to grade book is up here, and then you get a list of your grades. For every grade item, you get a long list, then there is the grade. This is now empty, because this is a new course instance, and some of these grade items have links, for example, introduction to quantitative research video. When you click on that link, then it will take you to a detailed explanation of what the questions were, which ones you got correct and which ones you did not. So you can see where exactly a grade comes from. That's a pretty nice feature. All the course materials are distributed using the Zoteo reference management system. And this is mostly a choice of convenience for me, because this is my main way of keeping track of my literature. This is the citation management software that I use. You may use something else, and it's a matter of personal preference, which one you want to use. The idea of this software is that once you sign up for the course, you send me the user account that you have, then I invite you to the library, and you can either access the library by using the online user interface, using your web browser, or you can install the Zoteo software. Then you can search for materials using the search bar here or the search bar here. The advantage of using the client software is that it's a bit faster to use than the website. Also, you get all the PDFs on your own computer, so you can access them when you travel. And I just find it more pleasant to use than the online version. Of course, if you don't want to install the software on your computer, then you can use the web website instead. When you install the Zoteo software, then you have to configure it to synchronize with the online library. And the way to do that is that you access the settings of the software, and there is synchronization settings. You enter your username here, and then it will synchronize automatically. So if it doesn't synchronize, there's the synchronization arrow here when you click this button, then you will get it synchronized. So synchronization gets all the readings to your computer, so you can work offline, make notes to those, and then the notes will stay in your verse. So it's just the one way to read on a synchronization.


What's going on? I am Greg Sosby and joined today by Ricky Sanders of dailyrotor.com with you to break down tonight's NBA Slate. What's happening Ricky? Nothing. Happy Martin Luther King Day to everyone and you're going to have to be ready early today. 11 games on this fan duel main slate and they start at 5 p.m. So do your research early today and get ready for what should be an exciting night of basketball. Absolutely. It's going to be a really fun night of basketball. So let's start by building a lineup and win some money and we begin well with some of our stars and that takes us to Portland where Damien Lillard is playing without CJ McCollum tonight, which means the price doesn't matter. Dave's got to get in there. Exactly. I think he's a lock button candidate for tonight and I'm not going to say that maybe about anyone else honestly in this order or in this video rather because Lillard doesn't have CJ McCollum tonight and when you take him out of rotation, this is the Damien Lillard show. Basically we're talking he's projecting for over a 32% usage rate on Daily Roto over a 38% assist rate. So again, just some big numbers from him and that's before we even talk about the matchup against this Golden State team that ranks 29th in defensive efficiency against opposing point guards. Damien Lillard one of the safest bets for minutes. He habitually plays over 37 minutes per game. So you have those heavy rates for a guy that doesn't leave the court and he's just a monster monster play tonight. Almost a no-brainer with Damien Lillard. The rates are all going to increase. The usage is going to be out of control. You have to get Damien Lillard into your lineup tonight. Otherwise, you're probably going to lose. But what star do you pair with Damien Lillard? We have a couple more we wanted to bring up and that takes us to LeBron James and this is an interesting one, Ricky, because Anthony Davis is back for the Lakers, which means the usage should go down for the King. You're still comfortable with him. How come? Yeah, it's because you see big minutes from LeBron James in competitive games. So obviously the usage rate isn't quite where it was with the, you know, Anthony Davis projected out. He's about a 35.5% usage rate player with Davis off the floor that goes down to about 31.5% with him. But against Boston with looks like everyone active, Kemba Walker and Jaylen Brown, it was a two point spread before the Anthony Davis news. Now I think we're talking close to a pick them, which means you have a battle between two pretty good teams. And I should note that Boston is susceptible to both small forwards and power forwards, even though they're a good defense. And you have LeBron James potentially playing into the high 30s of minutes for a guy with regardless of Davis on or off the floor, a 50 plus percent assist rate. So competitive game environments are always really interesting for superstars because instead of their normal minutes, you get those extended by one or two. And these are high efficiency players like LeBron James. That has just said, it's LeBron James. He's going to be awesome, but that's fine. All these players are awesome LeBron James. It doesn't matter if Anthony Davis is in there or not. The other stats will go up while maybe the scoring will go down a little bit. LeBron James fine option tonight over on FanDuel. All right. Moving on, we get to one more stud to chat about. And it's the Andre Aten who's back in the stud category after what he has done over the last week since returning to the starting lineup for the Phoenix Suns. Why do you like Aten over all the other center choices tonight? It's because the Suns are apparently committed to him once again. I mean, since he's moved into this starting lineup, 34, 48 and 35, 49 in terms of court time in two games. He is a guy who has not seen the bench much. It looks like Aaron Baines is going to be iffy tonight, so we could even see those minutes get higher. And during those two starts, we're seeing just massive numbers from Deandre, 26 points per game, 13 rebounds per game, two assists per game, over 54 FanDuel fantasy points per game. The matchup does not jump off the page. I mean, the Spurs League average defense in terms of pace and overall defensive efficiency should be noted 20 second in defensive efficiency against the opposing Senators. And we are projecting Aten for basically, you know, point one fantasy points fewer than Carl Anthony Towns tonight, two fewer than Hassan Whiteside, and he's priced at 8K and they're much more expensive. So he's not exactly cheap, but we don't care tonight with just how much he's been playing and how productive he has been paying the price to get Deandre Aten in there. According to Ricky Sanders, it is worth it. Even with all those choices on the slate, Deandre Aten Center worth starting tonight. But in order to get all of these superstars in there, you need to have some value. So let's talk about that now, Ricky. And we started with the Portland travel lasers and Damien Lillard. So it makes sense to start our values here as well. Without CJ McCollum, somebody's going to step up. It's going to be Anthony Simons. And if you thought the NBA was done with Anthony's after Hardaway, you are sadly mistaken because Simons is a legitimate thing without CJ McCollum in rotation. Basically, he's being forced into the high 30s of minutes and the team only had eight players last game. It looks like they're going to have nine tonight with the next guy being Moses Brown, who's just a true backup center. So I don't think that's going to affect the minutes of the guards.  And he'll be playing point guard kind of sporadically with Damien Lillard off the floor. And we already mentioned just how bad this Golden State team is against point guard. So I think you take that value all the way to the bank. Portland clearly a team that's going to need these other guards to step up. And Simons is basically free. He cost you nothing. And you know he's going to play all these extra minutes tonight without CJ McCollum. It's crazy to not have Simons in your lineup.  Don't make a mistake.  Let's move on away from Anthony Simons and into Marcus Morris with the New York Knicks. Morris has been out there. He's been effective. Hell, he's back. Yeah. And you look at this line for the New York Knicks, it makes you kind of scratch your head. They're being projected to score about eight points above their seasonal average. And there's no RJ Barrett tonight. So you just think to yourself, where is this offense going to come from? It's going to come from Julius Randall. And it's going to come from Marcus Morris, who's priced at just $5,200 since returning from this neck injury. Marcus Morris has attempted 17 plus shots in four of five games. His 24.7 usage rate this month would be a season high if it holds. And he's averaging over 35 fan duel fantasy points per month, which also, or per game this month, which will also be a season high. So he's in the midst of his best month of the season. And now you get this massive total for the Knicks. I think Marcus Morris is a great play. And again, he's not that expensive, so he helps you fit some of the superstars we talked about. Yeah, with that RJ Barrett, someone's got to pick up the pace. And according to what you said, the numbers are what they are. The Knicks are going to score even more than they normally do. Who's going to score? What's going to be Marcus Morris?  One final value player to get to, Ricky, and that takes us to Marvin Bagley, who has seen a minute's uptake as of Lee. No Rashawn Holmes in the lineup. And Bagley's getting all the time that he can handle right now for the Sacramento Kings. You believe that continues tonight. I do. I think this 30 plus minutes is just solidified as long as there's Rashawn Holmes and he can stay out of foul trouble. We have a reasonably competitive game expected. We're talking like six and a half, seven points depending where you're looking here. And Marvin Bagley is a 1.07 fan duel fantasy point per minute producer. I mean, this is not a guy who is unproductive when on the court. So you think about a 30 minute allotment for him just in an average environment. Even if, you know, we toned down the efficiency here because of this individual matchup against Bam out of bio, one fantasy point per minute for over 30 minutes is 30 fantasy points, which is great value at 5100. I think he's clearly has the upside of like a $7,075 player, which is not being taken into consideration here. And I think the 30 minutes could just be low on him. They could start playing him slightly more until Rashawn Holmes is back. This is a player who just came back from injury himself. So I think there's a lot of upside here and a stable floor despite the, you know, really a tough matchup, one that we usually don't recommend forwards and centers against, which is the Miami Heat. Not exactly a spot we go to often, but in this matchup, second day of a back to back for the Heat and Bagley playing as many minutes as well as he is, it's worth trying to go down that way. And maybe catching people off guard in an effort to win some money tonight. That's going to do it for us here on the FanDuel Hurryup. Ricky, I appreciate the time. Good luck tonight. Yes, good luck to you as well. And thanks for having me. All right, we appreciate the time tomorrow. We'll be back with another brand new edition of the Hurryup. We hope to see you there for Ricky Sanders. I'm Greg Sussman. Have a great night. Enjoy the games and we'll see you back here tomorrow.