Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for today's Planning Commission meeting. Today's date is February 23rd, 2022, and the time is 9.30 a.m. Today's meeting is completely remote via Zoom. There are a couple of different ways to follow the meeting or participate in the public hearing today. To both view and to participate, I recommend using the Planning Commission Zoom meeting link, which is posted on the Planning Department's home page at sccoplanning.com. Alternatively, if your computer is not equipped with a microphone, you may provide comment by telephone. The phone number to call is<PHONE_NUMBER>. When prompted, enter collaboration code 849-8564-9896. This information is also posted on the Planning Department webpage if you forget the phone number. We have one public hearing item on today's agenda. Time will be provided for members of the public to contribute their testimony. Speakers will be muted until called on to speak. I will ask participants who wish to provide testimony to either remotely raise their hand by selecting the hand icon on the Zoom link or by calling them by telephone by remotely raising your hand by pressing star 9. I will call on participants by either your name or the last four digits of your telephone number. If you're participating via the Zoom link today, when I call on you to speak, you'll see a pop-up on your screen that says Unmute. Please accept the pop-up, state your name for the record, and provide your testimony. If calling in via telephone, you must unmute yourself by pressing star 6 on your phone. Members of the public will be provided three minutes to speak. If at any time you have difficulty connecting to today to today's meeting via the Zoom link or by calling in using the phone, please email our support staff at Michael Lam. That's Michael.lam, L-A-M, at Santa Cruz County, U-S. He will be checking his email periodically throughout the meeting, and he's on standby and ready to assist you and make sure you connect. All right, it appears we're situated. I will now turn the Planning Commission meeting over to the Chair, Tim Gordon. Good morning. Good morning. And good morning to the Commission and members of the public. Welcome to February 23rd, 2022, meeting of the Santa Cruz County Planning Commission. The time is 9.33, and I'll call this meeting to order. Can we please have a roll call, Ms. Drake? Yes. All right. Commissioner Lazenby. Here. Commissioner Dan. Here. Commissioner Schaper-Fredes. Yes. Commissioner Shepard. Here. And Chair Gordon. Here. Thank you. Do we have any additions or corrections to the agenda today? No, not today. We'll move on to item three here, Declaration of Exportate Communications. Are there any exportate communications that the commissioners would like to discuss on at this time? Thank you. We can move on to item four, Oral Communications. This is the time when members of the public have the opportunity to speak on items that are not on today's agenda and are given two minutes to do so. Ms. Drake, do any members of the public that would like to speak at this time? I will check. I am not seeing any Chair. Okay, thank you. We'll close Oral Communications and move on to the scheduled items. Item number five, Approval of Minutes. The February 9th, 2022 Planning Commission meeting. Do you have anyone who'd like to make a motion on this or discussion? I'll move. Go ahead. Go ahead. If there's no discussion, I was going to move approval. And I will second that. Say aye. Aye. Opposed? Any abstaining motion passes and we can move on to item six. This item is application number 211189, the 601 Bonney Street, Santa Cruz, 95062. And Ms. Drake, do we have a presentation today? Yes. Alice, will you please promote Evan Dittmar's Hello, the PowerPoint. Unfortunately, my video is not working, but I am prepared to do a presentation. My name is Evan Dittmarce. I am the project planner for this application. The project under consideration today is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision to approve application 211189. This is for the appellants are Marcia White and Jerry Patterson. They are residents of the adjacent property at 210 Sixth Avenue. The property owner at 601 Bonney Street is Andrew Cohen. Next slide, please. The proposed project is to demolish an existing dwelling and detached garage in order to construct a 1,970 square foot dwelling with a 384 square foot ADU over a detached garage. And this project requires a coastal development permit and a variance for the location of the garage within the rear setback and also to have a garage door opening at less than 20 feet from the Assembly Avenue right of way. The project was approved at the December 17th, 2021 Zoning Administrator hearing. It was approved with design modifications, including increasing the proposed setback from six feet to eight and a half feet and tree protection measures and a requirement for the roofing to be non-reflective metallic. Next slide, please. The project was appealed by Marcia White and Jerry Patterson. Their appeal letter is exhibit 1A on page seven of the staff report. Their appeal largely focused on the location of the ADU in relation to their bedroom and living areas, the design of the garage and ADU in relation to the Harbor Special Community and existing development in the vicinity and an assertion that the location of the garage would present a hazard to neighboring properties and to pedestrian and vehicular traffic along Assembly Avenue and a general disagreement regarding the findings made to support the variance. Next slide, please. So the staff response to the appeal letter can be summed up as follows. The design and the location of the ADU are largely allowed pursuant to zoning code and state law. The design matches the existing pattern of development along Assembly Avenue and the design was evaluated to be compatible with the coastal and Harbor design criteria. Next slide, please. The next five photos are some neighborhood context which demonstrate how the project fits into the patterns of development found on Assembly Avenue. Next slide, please. So this is a garage immediately adjacent to the project site. The project site is seen on the right. These two garages here are less than 20 feet from the Assembly Avenue right of way. Next slide, please. This is another garage again at less than 20 feet from Assembly Avenue. It's about eight and a half feet enough width for a car to park there. Next slide, please. This garage is located approximately 500 feet north of the project site. You can see again a garage and other development here and further in the background, you can see two more garages also with less than 20 feet from Assembly Avenue. To their garage door opening. Next slide, please. This is looking back towards the homes that were shown in slide seven. And you can see that there are many houses here that enjoy the benefit of garage access from Assembly Avenue and or reduced setbacks for the structures to Assembly Avenue. Next slide, please. This home is located at 210 Sixth Avenue. It's adjacent to the subject property. And the development here is very similar to what is proposed at the project site. The project site is shown on the left-hand side of the picture. This is their existing back fence. Both of these structures have approximately 20-foot wall heights, 24-foot roof peak. The structures would both be located within five feet of the side yard property line. The garage step back here is around 18 feet, and it was approved as part of a variance in 1999. But this is about 10 feet further back than what is proposed. The proposed development is at 8.5 feet from the property line. What you're seeing here in the picture is just under 20 feet. Next slide, please. So when the applicant received notice of their appeal, they voluntarily revised their plans to try and address some of the privacy concerns that were raised by the neighbor in their appeal letter. They relocated the heat pump on the northwest corner of the structure. They located it to the east a little bit away from the living areas in the adjacent property. They also moved the deck and the patio from the western side of the ADU to the southern side of the ADU. And you can also see that the structure is moved back from six feet to eight and a half feet as required by the zone administrator. A note that the eight and a half feet in front of the garage in the garage apron serves as a parking space. It fits the requirements for a full-size on-site parking space. And it also will provide a little bit of room for a turnout for two-way traffic on Assembly Avenue. Next slide, please. These are the changes on the north and west elevations. You can see on the north elevation, the window sill height was raised. And you can see on the west elevation that the deck and porch and the stairway were wrapped around away from the area closest to the neighboring property. This is a design supported by staff. It's substantially in conformance with what was already approved and it achieves the objectives of what the property owner would like to do with the property as well as the privacy concerns raised by the neighbor. Next slide, please. So in conclusion, these plans were approved by Public Works, by Central Fire and the Coastal Commission. The project is substantially in conformance with the county zoning code. And the proposal matches the existing pattern of development along Assembly Avenue. And the property is constrained in that it has frontage on three rights of way. And there are two large trees on site which contribute to constraints to development. Staff did receive one letter of correspondence prior to the hearing. And I wanna take a minute to at least answer one of the questions that was raised there. And that was some clarification on what the 10 foot driveway to roadway separation was. DPW requires that a driveway and a roadway have 10 feet of separation between the two entrances. So in this case, a driveway paralleling Assembly Avenue would need to be set away from assembly at least 10 feet. It also appears that I misstated an actual distance between the trees and the right of way in the appeal response letter. And I wanted to clarify that although those measurements were called out incorrectly, the development constraints encountered on the property still stand. And the proposed location of the garage remains the superior design and best use of space on this parcel. Next slide, please. The staff recommendation is that your commission conduct a public hearing to consider the project appeal and to approve application 211189 based on the December 17th, 2021 zoning administrator findings and conditions of approval as well as the revised project plans included as exhibit C in the appeal response letter. And that concludes my presentation. I'm available for questions. Great, thank you so much, Mr. DeMars. Appreciate that very clear presentation. At this time, would any of the commissioners like to ask any questions of staff? Chair Gordon, I'm just- Yes, please. Thank you, your indulgence. Could I just ask that the first four slides be shown again, my computer wasn't cooperating. I could hear but not see. Just real quickly, if you wouldn't mind. Alice, would you mind? Yeah, thank you. Are you seeing the commissioner shepherd? Let's see, Evan, maybe you could walk us through things. Sure, so I can go over these again. So the proposal is to demolish the existing structures on site to construct- No, these two are fine. I just thought if there were any location photos I missed. Sure, next, can you advance two slides please? No, okay. Please go one more, please. Okay, good, thank you. Commissioner Shepherd, did that give you the answers you were looking for? Yes, thank you. Okay, great. Hey, any other questions of staff at this time? One, just to clarify and the regulations for the ADU would allow for a two-story ADU four feet from the property line. Is that correct, Mr. Goodmars? That's correct. From both the side and the rear property line. Okay, I just wanted to be really sure on that. I appreciate that. Any other questions? Okay, then let's move on. This time we'll hear, we'll have 10 minutes for the appellant and then we will have 10 minutes for the applicant. Then we'll go to public comment. At the end of the public comment, the appellant will have time to speak again as well. Ms. Drake, can you kickstart that for us please? Sure, thank you. So let's see, I'm checking. So the appellants, if you wouldn't mind raising your hand, we will start with you. All right, I see we have Marcia White. Good morning, you have 10 minutes. Okay, well, my husband, Jerry Patterson, is here with me, you can't see him, I guess. I don't know if you can see me, in fact. A couple of things we'd like to clarify. One, we have never protested the ADU, we are protesting the variance for the garage. And the reason we're protesting that is because it's one of the largest slots in the neighborhood, it is- I apologize, I need to interrupt for a quick second. Can we get the timer started, Ms. Drake? Or Alice, please. Thanks, Chair. So 10 minutes, please, Alice. Thank you, I'm in the back of that. Thanks. Thank you so much. Sorry, Marcia. Yeah, sorry, go ahead. Thanks, I appreciate it, go ahead, Ms. White. Well, we're not protesting the ADU, as I was saying, we are protesting the variance being granted to the garage setback. And as Evan said, the existing pattern of development would allow it. And I mean, the existing pattern of development that you have chosen, and in fact, in all of your exhibit pictures, are the non-conforming properties. About half are conforming, and I'm using just the block between Bonnie and Carmel, as an example. About half of the properties, the newer ones, especially, are conforming. And all of your pictures, with the exception of showing ours, the 2106 Avenue one, are conforming. So you're seeing all of the non-conforming properties, which are a problem for even the residents there, which the fire department is concerned about. And they were developed, they weren't developed, they were existing properties that were badly pushed together in the 70s and 60s. It is a pattern of development here, but it's the worst pattern of development. And it seems that the planning department in relative to this development is choosing the lowest bar for considering it existing pattern of development. And that's part of our complaint, is no, use the better properties, use the newer properties, use the conforming properties as a standard, not the worst ones. And by the worst, they're non-conforming and the reasons for it are obvious from some of the pictures. And also with respect to the pictures, our property 210 is not similar to the project going in. We have, we may have a 20 foot setback. I measured it from the edge of the paving to our garage door and it's 19 feet eight inches. And I don't exactly know where the property line is. I assumed it was postal design area. Are we still here? Ms. White, can you hold for one more moment? I apologize. Sure. Sorry about that. Sorry about that. Recording in progress. We're back. Looks like we're back. Okay. And then with respect to- Ms. White, I'm- That's okay. Can we get the timer going?  Yeah, so. That's okay. That's okay. Thank you. There we go. Thanks for your patience, Marcia. Yes, so anyhow, I feel that certainly with respect to ours, our property matching this, the ADU garage, you're wrong in height, you're wrong in setback and everything and it's simply not a match. In fact, ours should be the standard and effect that it is conforming. And I don't, I just measured it. I don't know what you guys have on yours, but I took my paint measure and I know what the setback is to the garage. And it's, I don't know, somewhere between 19 and 20 feet. And with respect to the changes, we appreciate them. We think the heat pump was moved the foot back from our house. If it creates a problem, as I said in my letter, we can resolve that with lawyers later on. If it's, I mean, that's measurable. It's something we can fix. It's a shame it's not addressed, but that's the least of our worries. So I think that's basically it. Just the existing pattern of development should not be the least conforming pattern of development. And in your exhibit pictures, that's pretty much what it is. And there are multiple conforming properties and the two properties featured that are non-conforming 80%, well, no, all but one driveway is owned by a single owner. And it was all part of a development parcel that that was, has been sold in the last couple of years and is again, for sale. And it's a problem. It's a problem because their parking isn't adequate. It's a problem because no one knows where they are. There's no, it's crazy to try and duplicate something that doesn't work as it stands right now. And that's again, the issue being that apparently a variance is being given because the proposed project matches that mess. And the other reason is because they have trees which, you know, could be good, could be bad. It could be designed better and differently and still meet the zoning requirements instead of having your variance. And that's what we and all of our neighbors, I think 15 or 20 people signed a complaint about it. And the answer was the garage got moved back another two and a half feet. And that wasn't the issue. The issue is why doesn't it conform? And the answer we're getting is because it has a hardship because it has two tree, two big trees and because it has streets on three sides, which we point out because of that, they're allowed to choose which their frontage property is, which gives them less setback, even less setback than corner development properties. So, or less setback loss than corner development properties. So, I mean, that's what we don't get. Why is a variance being given and the answer seems to be because it's kind of conforming. And we think that the level of conformance that you're looking for is the worst possible example. And that's it. I'm done. Thanks, Marcia. All right, chairs. Now we turn it over to the project applicant for 10 minutes. Okay. Looks like we have the applicant with us today. If you would like to speak, please raise your hand. All right. And Alice, will you please put 10 minutes on the clock for the applicant? Also, if you'd like to reserve a little bit of time at the end of your response, we can bring it back to you after public comment as well. So good morning. Please state your name for the record. Sure. Good morning. My name is Andrew Cohen. Good morning. Good morning, Jocelyn. Good morning, planning commissioners and to Evan. My wife and I bought this property in 2004 and we've lived there for the first five years and then we moved away and rented it out. And so we are now in a position in our lives that we're gonna retire. So this is gonna be our retirement home and we've been working on this project for about three years. And so I totally disagree with Mrs. White relative to her concerns on variance. Almost every project in the harbor has a variance. And I'm not gonna go through all of the locations that have variances relative to the properties when Marsha and Jerry's property was built. They have about six or seven variances on their property. They're on a 20 foot wide lot and in 1890, her lot was split and that became part of my lot. And therefore it's been there for a long time. There are constraints on this property with the coastal redwood tree that's over 75 years old and there is a very, very large avocado tree, right? Both of them right in the center of a lot. I'm not too sure why there are all these concerns relative to getting approval since it's already been approved by Department of Public Works. The Coastal Commission thanked us very much for the design work that we had done. And that was really enlightening. And then having to have this appeal after it's been approved has been a real concern. So I'm not gonna start defending what the design is and things like that. I think Evan is gonna do a much better job than me. So I'm gonna reserve my time for after in order to make a response at the end. So I thank you for your time this morning. Thank you. All right, eight minutes left. Thank you, Mr. Cohen. Do we have any questions via the commission of the appellant or applicant at this time? Seeing none, we can move on to the public comment portion. This application. Thank you. So at this time, I will ask any members of the public who wish to speak on this item, the proposed appeal of the 601 Bonnie Street project to raise your hand using the hand icon if you're on a Zoom or to press star nine on your phone. Chair, it does look like Marsha would like to provide some wrap up comments. Hey, yeah, if we don't have any other public comment then I suppose we can move back to the appellant for the remainder of her time and then over to... Okay. I would just suggest if anyone chimes in because we're moving pretty quick that we do give them an opportunity. That's probably one. Okay, thank you. I will let you know. All right, Marsha, back to you for five minutes. Sure, I mean, I just one surprising comment from Mr. Cohen that is that he said he lived there for five years. No, to our knowledge, when they first bought it they spent a couple of weeks painting it and fixing it up a little bit. And then we could think of maybe three or four nights that they made him spend here in Santa Cruz. Otherwise, no, they've never lived here. And our lot wasn't split in 1890. I was split in 1940s, which is, that has nothing to do with anything. So, but no, the Cohen's haven't lived here. And that's the one comment that surprised me. The rest of it is all known. So that's it. I'm done. Thank you, Marsha. Okay, Chair, I'm still not seeing any members of the public. So I believe Mr. Cohen has eight minutes left on the clock. You wanna send it back over to him? All right, Mr. Cohen, you have eight minutes left. Provide some final comments. Thank you. So, as you can see, there's a pattern of animosity towards me by my neighbor. She's telling me how I've lived in my house. So that's irrelevant to this whole conversation. So let's just drop that part. She also says that if the heat pump causes concerns that will settle that with a lawsuit or lawyers, it's like the issue here is getting approval for something that has been so due diligently planned and executed and approved. So I don't know how much more the commission needs to hear relative to properties even on the same street that have variances. I'm the only property that is being built that requires four off street parking. It's a long-term rental and there are four tenants currently in that house. One of them is a professional as a truck. So there's now five, and each one has a car. So they have five cars, two of them have significant others and they come over and they have cars or seven cars. In addition to that, we're gonna take down the non-conforming garage and that's gonna allow another parking place, public parking place, on the harbor. So now you have eight spaces relieved because it's gonna be my wife and I and we're gonna be parking on our property. So it's a benefit to the community. I've talked to many neighbors and when Marcia says all the neighbors are against it, that's just not simply not true. People realize that there's development and it increases the value of their properties. It increases the value of the aesthetics for people visiting the harbor and this is all conforming and it's gonna be a beautiful property and it's gonna help appreciate everyone's values in the area. So really, I don't know more I can tell you other than if it comes down to the fact that you need to have more evidence on who is getting various as and not, it's a pretty routine thing that I see as a project going forward in that it is required because the department of public works has actually reviewed other alternatives for the garage and things and they will not support it. So really in summary, I hope this gets approved. I hope you realize it does increase the value of everyone's home in the area. It's gonna increase the aesthetics of the neighborhood and it's gonna be enjoyment for all that pass by. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Cohen, appreciate that and Ms. White as well. Thank you for your comments. At this time, we'll go ahead and close the public comment and bring it back to the commission for discussion. Would any commissioners like to talk about this item? I can go first, that's okay. I just have a clarifying question, which I think I know the answer to, I just want to be clear. So the variance is in here because of the garage setback. Is that right? Okay, that's it. Not, doesn't have anything to do with the ADU because as commissioner Gordon said, they could just construct a single family dwelling and then after that, go in with a building permit and build an ADU four feet with a four foot setback is that right? Right. I just want to, I just wanted to make sure I understood that. Yeah, I think that's the only question I had. Thank you. Thank you, commissioner Dan, commissioner safe afraid is? Yes, I have a clarification question too. So it's on the same vein that commissioner Dan was talking about. So this is a variance for the garage setback and the variance what's proposed is eight and a half feet and what would be required is 20 feet for conforming. Is that correct? Right. So the rear yard setback from assembly avenue is 15 feet but there's also a standard in the zoning code that requires 20 feet from a garage opening to the street. So the structure itself and the opening to the garage door both require variance. Okay. And the appellant lives to the north of the proposed site. Is that right? Correct. Okay. So does this variance approval of this variance change in any way? What kind of solar access they would have to their property? I think that was one of their concerns. We don't believe it does. I did pull their project plans that from 1997 when their home was built and both of these structures are very similar in height within a foot of each other. So the likelihood that shading between the two structures to the roof is highly, highly unlikely. Okay. That's all that I had. Thank you. Commissioner Shaperfreitas, commissioner Lazendee. To your hand. Yes. I had a question about the heat pump. I think that I read that correctly that said that it would be moved to another side of the garage or the ADU or was it just one foot away from where it was going to be? It was not moved to another side. It was moved away from the previous location. I don't have the exact distance that it was moved. I can reference that quickly if you want to say it. I would estimate it's several feet down the northern wall, but it has not moved to another side of the building. Could it be put inside the garage? No, the heat pump is on the exterior of the building and it's on the second story of the ADU. Okay. So a couple of feet would diminish the noise that was affecting the appellant? The additional distance is probably not going to make a huge difference in noise, but the heat pump is a component of a building that's normally associated and it meets the setbacks. So in that sense, there's not a lot of regulation that we would have in the location of it. This was just a building permit and the structure already met the setbacks. The heat pump could be there. So the applicant did make an effort to pull it away, apparently as far as they felt feasible away from their living area, but there's no variance or anything requested for the heat pump. This is a normal component of a dwelling. Okay. And I think the appellant was concerned that maybe the fire department had some concerns about an 8.5 foot setback for the garage door. I didn't see anything from fire. Yeah. I was not made aware of any issues fired. The applicant was routed to fire. They approved it. They actually approved it with the six foot setback. And so the eight and a half foot setback should be even better, but they did not raise any concerns with the location of that garage six feet from Assembly Avenue. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner Laysenby. Commissioner Shepard, did you have any comments or questions? Sorry, no, I'm good. Great. Thank you. I did have a couple quick questions. Just to clarify, this variance has been a big effort to keep that big redwood tree, right? That's the main purpose here. Okay. And practically we have a 20 foot setback from garage door to, in general, correct me if I'm wrong, but to allow for a parking off the street, right? And so it's a driveway. In this case, because there's parking, it's an alley, it's not the main street and there is parking provided. The 20 foot rule seems like it wouldn't necessarily apply as much because we're keeping the tree, we're providing the parking and it's like kind of similar to like a front yard averaging, right? Where, which is already allowed and typically where, you know, we're kind of looking at the other parcels to figure out what that setback would practically be allowed to be. So that all makes sense. Yes. Yes, that would compare to front yard averaging. Okay. That all makes sense. Thank you. Those are my only questions. If any other commissioners had comments or questions, happy to hear them. Otherwise, anyone would like to start with a motion? I can do that. I'll just say first that, you know, whenever we get an appeal from the ZA to the commission, these are always real tough because it indicates, you know, a disagreement among neighbors. So, you know, I understand change is difficult, but I think that this project overall, that is conforming the variance I read through the variance findings very, very carefully. I think the findings are correct. I know this neighborhood really well. I used to live on Fifth Avenue back in the day in the late 90s. So I understand the issues with parking and whatnot. And I do appreciate the extra parking spaces. And I think that this project was a really good example of why we retained the requirement for parking for ADUs in the coastal zone because that was a big kind of like a point of discussion when we were considering the ADU ordinance. And I think that this neighborhood shows why it was a good idea to keep that because parking is so difficult for visitors for this area to access the coast. So, I will move the staff recommendation and hope that the neighbors can get along in the future and work out some of these differences. Thank you, Commissioner Dan. Chair, I'll second that. Thank you, Chris. Thank you, Commissioner Schaefer-Fredes. Do we have any other discussion before we move to vote? I'm just like the second what Commissioner Dan said. I appreciate that it was really well said and variances are challenging and typically they're reserved for really special needs circumstances. And so I appreciate the careful thought that's gone into this by staff to really look at both sides and try to make something that works. So thank you for that. At this time, then we can move to a vote. Ms. Drake, can we have a roll call vote, please, on this item? Sure. Commissioner Shepard? Yes. Commissioner Lazenby? Yes. Commissioner Dan? Yes. Commissioner Schaefer-Fredes? Yes. And Chair Gordon? Yes. All right, motion passes. Thank you so much. Thank you to everyone on that application. We appreciate everyone's hard work on that. And with that, we'll close item six. And move on to the regular agenda items, item seven. Do we have a planning director's report for today, Ms. Drake? Actually, the planning director or interim planning director, Payah Levine, it was not able to join us this morning. She did send out an email to Mike and I, which you should have received, which was an informative email just notifying the planning commissioners that the sustainability update effort is getting closer to the finish line as far as preparation of materials by staff. And I believe Payah sent the commissioners a link to a webpage on the planning department page. If not, I can send that later. If you receive any questions from members of the public, all of the materials as they're finalized will be posted there along with the timeline for the CEQA document review and public hearings that will follow, I guess maybe later this summer. So that's exciting. Gear up, lots of hearings will be required for that update. It's a monumental achievement really on the sustainability team's part. So she just wanted me to relay that information to you and I think that is it. Thank you. Looking forward to it. I know that's gonna be a lot of work for everyone and we appreciate the hard work that goes into that. Any commissioners have questions or wanna talk about that any further? Okay. And let's move on to item eight, report on upcoming meeting dates and agendas. Do we have anything to report, Ms. Drake? So on March 9th, the next scheduled meeting date, we have the wireless communication facility code amendments coming your way. And that is the only item we have scheduled at this time for March. There are a couple of other update type projects, code update projects that should be making their way to you shortly, but haven't been totally nailed down as far as a date, so. Great, thank you so much. County council report, anything to report, Mr. Zizweta? Good morning, just a couple items on the wireless communication ordinance. I wanted to just make you aware if you weren't aware already that this ordinance went to the board first for their recommendation, right? So this was kind of a different process that the board had requested that it go first to the board to take a look to make sure that this is gonna be kind of what they had in mind and then they would send it to the planning commission. So I just wanted to make you aware that that was the process this time around. You're welcome to listen to that meeting. That was in December. And I'm happy to discuss anything and everything related to that ordinance. It's a fun one. You guys are gonna have lots of fun with it. And I look forward to talking to you about it. The other thing I just wanted to just commend Commissioner Dan on her comments. We see a lot of these neighbor disputes. It's unfortunate and it puts the commissioners, I think in a tough spot sometimes because we are seeing projects that conform with our regulations conform with the law and there's really not much we can do if folks are unhappy with something like this where it just, I think it's important. That's why I wanted to kind of make a point to say thank you to Commissioner Dan because it's important for folks to hear that they need to resolve their differences without lawyers and kind of try to figure out what works best for the neighborhood. And it's, yeah, unfortunately, I see this all too often when it's too late and lawyers are involved. It just gets very messy and very long and very expensive. So I appreciate those kind of comments. But that's it for me. Thank you, sir. Okay, great. Well, with that, we can close today's. Could I just ask one question? We say our next meeting in March. Are we also meeting the second date in March? We haven't finalized the March schedule yet for the second meeting. There still is time for folks to make reservations for that date. So, yeah. I was just going to add with the comment about neighbor's disputes that is kind of in my years on the Planning Commission, we used to hear a lot more of these. So actually they declined a lot in terms of how many come to the Planning Commission. But in fact, that's kind of our job. So we may hear more in the future. And I think it does provide an opportunity for people to put it, who have concerns to at least help they got heard. So I think it's, so I think it's important and probably a vital part of what we do, which is I haven't seen a lot of it, frankly. Used to be there'd be one appeal after another. So I think obviously planning is doing a much better job of explaining things. So I just want to note that. I think you'll see more. And as seen as, yeah. The ADU's especially just a quick comment. You know, we're starting to see some of these ADU projects come through that are, you know, in the urban services area on the smaller lots and the two-story ones can sometimes be controversial. We had another one recently at ZA that was controversial. And I was wondering if that one would get appealed. So I think as some of the amended regulations come our way that serve to implement additional density, we might see more appeals. Well, that's a good case in point. And another reason why I think we need to have enough hearings and public outreach on the tidy home ordinance to do whatever we can to make sure the widest band of the public understands what's going on. Because that's the way it come back to haunt you and people. So well, I didn't know anything about this. Well, we need to make plenty of opportunities just so people really know what's going on. That's all. Great. Well, thank you everyone. Appreciate it. Everyone's agreed. Thank you everyone. All right, we'll see you in March. Thanks everybody.


Hello, how are you guys today? I'm going to show you my current morning routines that I do to keep my energy up as well as help me recover from the liver damage from the carnivore diet. Now we've done these individually over the course of the last year or two, but today in this video I'm going to show you all of them currently up to date. We have the testicle protocol for testosterone, which makes a huge difference for my energy levels. We have the detox smoothie with the soluble fiber and the flex throws, and then we just have the regular energy boost in the morning with the magnesium and vitamin C supplements. So let me show you guys what we have. So here we just have the goat testicles from Frankie's Free Range Meat. We are going to take one out. I'm going to show you guys how I prepare it, and more importantly, how I consume it, especially if you're not one to kind of eat raw things and you're kind of squeamish with the flavors.  So for me, I usually do half of a whole one. If you're using like a larger beef testicle, obviously you'd use like a quarter, or if you have a smaller testicle, maybe you'd use the whole one. So we dice it up with a sharp knife, then I'm going to take like a more heavy-duty knife and just kind of chop through it. And this is because we're going to swallow this down. We're not going to chew it, you know? So we want it to be kind of mushy for our stomach to digest it easier. And you don't really want to put this in the blender because, you know, you'll start oxidizing everything. And if you guys haven't done this before, start with like maybe this much, max. Don't eat the whole thing. You want your stomach to adjust to this. So after you do it a few times with a smaller amount, then you can have a larger amount. All right, guys. So here's the trick. As much as I've been eating raw meat for years and years and I don't mind the flavor, it's not something I enjoy. No one enjoys eating this stuff, even if you can eat it and chew it and down it. Got my spoon. We have our testicle chopped up. And then I have some masticum here with some water. So what I'm going to do is just hold my nose so I don't taste the testicle. I'm going to swallow it down.  So then after I swallow the masticum and I release my nose, I don't taste it. So let's give this a shot. So as I'm swallowing this down, with my nose held down, I don't taste it at all. So we swallowed all the testicle. Now we have about a teaspoon of masticum. Actually, you want to take about half a teaspoon, you don't want to take too much of this. Now when I release my nose, I literally do not taste anything besides a little bit of masticum. Now the masticum is ground into a powder. We have this on organshelpmans.com. I just use a spice grinder or coffee grinder, which is on my Amazon shop, to make it into a powder. And you really just want to make sure, this is the spice grinder, Mueller amazon.com.shop.franktifano. Just make sure when you put that half teaspoon of masticum in your mouth, to swish it around really well with the water so that it kind of gets rid of all the taste of the testicle. So that is basically the easiest way how anyone can have a raw glandular without tasting it whatsoever. Very simple.  Honestly, it's really not that unpleasant. It's just, first thing in the morning, I'd prefer not to taste it. So that's the testosterone protocol. I do that outside of other things. Maybe I'll have some magnesium and vitamin C in an hour or two, which we'll show you next, but I like to keep it separate. If you're a female, you can do ovaries. I think we still have some left on Frankie's for your age meet.com. I also like to do adrenals separately. I don't do everything altogether, but I'll say again, this is so, so important for my energy levels. Guys, if I don't do this after about a week and a half, two weeks, I start getting like physically fatigued. So with my liver damage, hormones, lack of sleep stress, I'm not producing as much testosterone as I should. So this really kind of keeps the physical energy levels up and kind of keeps me going, so to speak. Very, very important for just pure energy levels. It's the most important thing I do. Most important thing by far, you know? And that's why we're showing you guys this first in this video is because this is the most important thing we're going to do today. So we'll see you guys for the next morning routine. What's up, guys? Good morning for the second time. I keep all of these routines separate for fairly different reasons. When I have those raw testicles, I really want them to absorb and digest over the course of several hours as the sole thing in my stomach. So I really get all of those testosterone and glandular benefits. Now we're doing the liver detox smoothie, which I have showed you guys before. And the purpose of this is to accelerate the liver detox by what I'm guessing is 10 to 30 percent. This is very significant. I just don't do it enough because it's a little time consuming and sometimes I'm lazy in the morning. But this could literally be the difference from taking five years to detox down to four years. So very, very significant. I think it needs to be done three to five times a week to have that effect because the amount of fiber that's in this, the soluble fiber, is the main thing that promotes the liver detox. So some of you guys might remember this because, again, we did a video, I think, over a year ago now. But let's give you a quick look. So I got this NutriBullet for free.  So we're just going to put some filtered mineral water in here. I have some lemons. We have the flexed rose from Frankie's Fruerange Foods. We have acacia powder, soluble fiber, and then we have inulin powder, artichokes, soluble fiber, a little bit of salt. We have our masticum that we want to take with this because it's pure sugar and we don't want to cause, like, dysbiosis. The salt, a little bit of added flavor, and the lemons also add some anti-scorbutic property, some vitamin C. So I'll put the masticum on the side. For now, this is not going in the smoothie. It's just going to be consumed after we drink it. You don't have to put salt in this. I just like a tiny pinch because it actually, you know, this tastes good and it brings out the flavor. So we'll do about a tablespoon of the artichoke fiber, two tablespoons of the acacia fiber, and this is, to me, this one tastes the best and it's very, very important. So if you guys are unfamiliar with flexed rose, we launched it a few years ago. It's a pure glucose powder and glucose actually directly detoxes the liver. So we're going to do two tablespoons of glucose and glucose is not as sweet as sugar. So it's not going to be, like, adding, you know, pure fructose or pure sugar to this. We don't want to blend it up that much. All right. We've got our steel lemon squeezer after the other one snapped into, like, three different pieces. I'm squeezing a big lemon. If you don't have lemons, you could do a little bit of ascorbic acid in here. That's just as good. It also adds some acidity and some flavor. So we're doing two lemons. Now we'll go over to my outlet over here and we'll blend it a little bit, shake it up. One's a little bit more. Shake it up. It should be good. Now the fill line here for mixing usually isn't enough water for the amount of powder I add. So I'm just going to put a little more water in here and then just shake it up a tiny bit more. So we don't just have this movie guys. First I do half a teaspoon of mastic gum again to just prevent H. pylori overgrowth because when you're having like a pure sugar drink like this, it's pretty easy to cause Candida dysbiosis if you have liver damage if you're susceptible to the overgrowth. So a little bit of mastic gum and I do take vitamin C and magnesium, one vitamin C, two magnesium with this smoothie and then we'll just kind of drink and chug this down. I won't normally hydrate the mornings that I do this because I can't drink that much fluid at once. So now I'm hydrated and I've stimulated some liver detox with the glucose and then the soluble fiber, the fiber is going to kind of absorb those toxins and as I hydrate throughout the rest of the morning, earlier part of the day, it's just a really, really good way to accelerate the body's healing. This is a safe amount to do. If you double the amount of powders I put in here, you might be fine but that's going to make you more prone to the gut imbalances possibly Candida fungal overgrowth as well as maybe make you poop your pants. So just be pretty careful with the amounts and experiment with them before you go higher, especially this and the mastic gum. So we're just going to show you guys one more routine and wrap it up. Good morning for the third time guys and I actually showed you this routine in the video I did a week or two ago, my full supplement routine. And we also just did this for the smoothie, the liver detox smoothie. Just taking the vitamin C and magnesium. This is what I do most days because I just want to wake up and get out the door and go to work. So it's just one of the vitamin C capsules, two of the magnesium capsules and then I hydrate a lot with just bottle mineral water. I usually try to drink about half a bottle of this and then another half a bottle over the course of the morning. Just to really hydrate my cells, hydrate my tissues, the magnesium might notice a big difference in mental clarity is very helpful against the EMF radiation and the vitamin C is important for antioxidants. So almost forgot I do take mastic gum as part of that third routine as well because when you go to bed at night, you know, you're lying down and your gut motility is really low. And the reason I wake up in the morning with a headache a lot of the time is because that toxic bile is just sitting in my stomach. Having the mastic gum in the morning promotes the movement and like kind of detox of the bile duct as well. Not as much as the smoothie, but you know just hydrating really well can do that. I've just noticed that, you know, sometimes also when that food's sitting, I do get a little bit of dysbiosis. So very helpful to have the mastic gum on an empty stomach in the morning. Also same thing like at night an hour or two after the meals. Consistently throughout the day in small amounts keeps digestion consistent. So those are the three things I currently do in the morning that you guys don't see a lot of the time in my days of eating. The testosterone I try to do once every two weeks. I mean once a week would probably benefit me a little more, but as long as it's at least every two weeks, I feel pretty good. I keep the physical energy. The liver detox smoothie, honestly I haven't been doing it as much as I should just because again I get lazy in the morning, but you know I want to heal as quickly as possible and doing that at least two or three times a week would really help accelerate the healing process. And then that last routine is the supplements I take pretty consistently every morning. You know sometimes I'll throw a few different things in there like a B complex, a vitamin B9, a vitamin B1 depending on how I'm feeling. But the hydration with the magnesium and the vitamin C is always consistent.  So thank you guys for joining me today. We have the testicles on frankiesurangemeat.com, FlexJaws Powder, frankiesurangews.com, you can get the other stuff at like All Foods or a Natural Grocer, also online I think, and then all the supplements that you guys saw are on organsupplements.com. So thank you guys for joining and continuing to support me. All of those businesses can be seen on frank-to-phile.com, but as usual guys, please drop a like on the video, leave a comment down below, subscribe so that YouTube can unsubscribe you next week, and be sure to check that notification bell so they don't notify you of my videos. Thanks again guys and I'll see you soon.


Hey guys, it's Nate, AKA The Foot Accountant, and welcome back to the channel. Shapeshifter Heroes, you heard me, correct. Shapeshifter Heroes look like they might be coming soon based off of a leak that we have just seen posted yesterday and of course, the website of EA and the car design that they show on that website and that's been there for a couple days, but now we have a concrete leak that shows us that there actually might be something coming related to a new hero card for at least one of the heroes in FIFA 22. I wanna take a look at that, more Shapeshifter leaks and talk about the insane summer swap objectives that EA dropped yesterday, eight tokens in one day. It was crazy, now maybe they can step away and say, hey, we released so many tokens, we're now ahead, we were just talking about it in yesterday's video that we needed more swap tokens and then EA goes out and puts eight tokens in one day, crazy. So I'll talk about that and of course, the upgrade pack situation, how can you be trying to pack Shapeshifters right now on this game or crafting in the menus? We'll talk about that best grind on the video today. So if you're excited for maybe a Shapeshifter hero, hit the thumbs up on the video and subscribe if you're new. Let's start there once again. This is the webpage that we looked at earlier at on the weekend actually showing this card right here. I know you can't see it, it's kind of behind my face cam, I'll hide it for a second. You see that hero little insignia right here at the top, right? With the crown on top of the football. That is the hero, little design that's on every single hero card. Hero captains, the base hero cards. So this guy is thinking, is there gonna be a hero card, a part of Shapeshifters? And then we had this leak yesterday from Foot Sheriff. Ole Solskar is getting an SBC, a player pick SBC and a two version set of Shapeshifter heroes cards coming, we don't know when, but coming soon. This opens the door for more Shapeshifter heroes as well. But that's the real question. This is an SBC and it was leaked on a Monday. So what does this really mean? Stats predicted of course, and it's a dual player pick. He is listed as a left wing and a center attacking mid. Now these are predicted stats of course, but again what we just said, this opens the door. Is this going to be, and this is where we're gonna think critically here for a second. Is this going to be a one time only SBC? Is this gonna be the only foot heroes card that gets a Shapeshifter hero? Or is there more of them coming? Ginola, Mostavoy, Ole are a couple of cards that have not gotten different hero versions yet. They didn't get a hero captains card or anything like that. Will we see more heroes dropped after this? We don't know. Now since this is SBC and it was leaked on a Monday, I think this content is gonna come before Friday. This to me is not content that's related to like a new third week of Shapeshifters as of right now. I know it seems like a lot of those player, we just had the Rafael Guerrero, right? So it's just like, okay, that's a lot of player pick SBCs for two different Shapeshifter cards in a short time period. But this being leaked on a Monday makes me feel like we're gonna get this Ole SBC in the next coming day. So, I mean, this is a big dub regardless of whether it's the only hero card that we're gonna have for a Shapeshifter's variant or if there's gonna be more. Ole has not had any other cards yet this year besides his base hero item. He is due an upgrade, right? He needs a skill move and a weak foot upgrade 100% and a big stat attribute update. He's five foot 10. I believe he has like average body type, which doesn't help his card in game that much. But still, good links there, right? Green link to any Premier League card. And, you know, it's kind of interesting about this. Maybe EA setting the stage for a transferred Erling Holland Manchester City card coming out maybe in a month or so during footies because this would be a green link to that Erling Holland as well. Some Norwegian links, especially being in the Premier League, that would be pretty cool. So, just kind of keep that in mind with those cards as well. And this Ole has a lot of hype and a lot of potential right now. As I look in the game, I wanted to see if there was a new card design. There's not. It just shows the regular Shape Shifters card design and there's nothing else in there. So, I don't know when this SBC is going to be dropped. I don't know the details about this by any means. But, of course, what we can see right now is it's a leak and it is confirmed to be coming. I think it's going to be in the next couple of days, but we'll have to see what EA's plans are with that. And really now, it just kind of confirms that we're going to get different versions of heroes inside of Shape Shifters. But is it the only one? That's our big question. Hopefully we see more. We won a Ginola. We won a Mostavoy. There's a couple other cards that haven't gotten different heroes yet. So, we have hope for those. But right now, all we know is about an Ole. So, that could be pretty interesting. EA, just give them the juice, make it a good card. Let us have fun. That's what we hope for with this. Now, speaking of more Shape Shifters leaks, there is another one and it is also a Premier League. Jamie Vardy Party is getting a Shape Shifters SBC in the following days. Stats are a prediction and the position is unknown. Some people think this is going to be a right wing, Jamie Vardy. I kind of hope that it's a center-backed Jamie Vardy. I know nobody really wants that or thinks that might be kind of crazy.  And just imagine another English center-back in the Premier League with a lot of pace like Jamie Vardy, but with like, you know, of course, boosted defending stats and stuff like that. Is that very realistic? No, but it would be very fun. So the thing with Jamie Vardy is this might be, we have a little bit of potential here. Imagine a five-star skill if it's an attacker, right? Let's say it's a right-wing Vardy. Imagine a five-star skill, Jamie Vardy. We have never had Jamie Vardy with five-star skills in FIFA. His 93 wrote to the final card, already has 99 attack positioning and 99 finishing with 99 reactions and composure. A very, very good card, especially for a striker if they make him a right-wing. And they give you a very, very clinical right forward. Or, you know, you could even move an in-game to a striker, of course. But this is a card that is usually pretty FIFA meta, but he's never had like five-star skills. So hopefully EA gave him the juice. If they made him four-star, five-star, I mean, I could see that as well, but I hope they give him like a five-four or something like that and make this Jamie Vardy just like crazy. So that is one other leak that we have right now at the moment. I think either Jamie Vardy or Ole is going to be our SBC content today. Since we did not have a player SBC yesterday, I mean, we did have Eusebio. So technically for an icon SBC, we had a player. And also this Eusebio brought us our first ever 90 rated squad requirement in FIFA 22. I know we had these last year, I believe. The first ever 90 rated squad in FIFA 22 was dropped yesterday with this. So that was kind of interesting to see. This Eusebio is definitely a little overpriced. It is cheaper than what he was before the leaks came out about his SBC. I think his SBC is coming in at like 2.3 mil. He was 2.6 before the leaks. So there's that.  But other than that, we didn't have a player SBC yesterday. So that would make me think that Vardy or Ole, the player pick, would be today on Tuesday. Now a little bit more about Tuesday content. Like I was saying, the year in review player pick is expiring today as well. If you guys that did that or have done that SBC, it is expiring and going away today on Tuesday. I would imagine this is either gonna get re-upped or they will drop some other sort of either player pick or upgrade pack Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday have all been sort of like gamble pack days in the past couple of weeks. We had the 85 plus player pick again yesterday. So really it just comes down to is EA gonna re-release the year in review or are they gonna give us something new? So we'll just watch out for that today. And I would expect another token SBC as well. I think we had the SBC six a couple of days ago. SBC seven did not give us a token. And of course yesterday we had all eight tokens in objectives, which we'll talk more about here in a second. But I think we would get another shapeshifter challenge maybe today or some other SBC that gives out a token today on Tuesday as well. Speaking of tokens, you guys know this is a really, really huge piece of summer swaps content. Yesterday when we saw this at content drop we were like, oh my gosh, I dropped four tokens. And then we looked really closely at the reward down there. I was like, wait a second. There's two of these cards in every single objective. It's crazy. So we went from only having what four tokens released to now we have 12 total tokens that have been dropped for summer swaps if you can get these done. Now there's a couple caveats to this. You can't actually have all four or all 12 done at the time of me recording this video because all of us have only had a chance to play four games in the live foot friendly one league but it is golden goal. So right now there are two golden goal game modes going on. We've got the summer swaps one league game mode. And then of course we've got the shapeshifters cup. So people are doing a lot of golden goal and friendlies at the moment. But again, with this one league mode the only bad part about all this is that you only have four matches per day. I've already played two. This is out for so long though. It's out for literally a whole month almost. So you're gonna be able to get this done semi easily. You know, play a couple of games per day. All you have to do is get four wins. It's golden goal, boom. You're gonna get yourself eight tokens with all of these including some squad battles matches which is not very hard as well. You play against a low rated low chemistry team. You know, kind of pick and choose which opponents you play against in squad battles on that world class difficulty. And you're gonna get yourself some tokens as well.  So that kind of stuff. This was really nice. This was the biggest surprise yesterday from EA Sports. Them dropping eight summer swap tokens in one day. It was actually crazy. And the one thing I wanna talk about this is people were asking like Nate are we gonna get another set of icon swaps? Last summer we had icon swaps four that I believe started in July. Maybe it was late July. The way that those objectives look, they really seem to me like icon swap objectives. So whether it's gonna be later on in July, this makes me think that we're not gonna see icon swaps really soon. Unless EA is really, really trying to drive engagement and games played in the summer. Which I think is, you know, you can obviously tell they're trying to do that right now if you think from EA's perspective. They want to show that people are playing their game in the summer months when it's usually dead. And they're trying to get people to go out and play right now with this golden gold stuff and with the swaps programs that they have been, you know, really implementing a lot this year in FIFA 22. So I just, with these, with the similarity of this to icon swaps, again, squad battles and friendly mode kind of involved in all of this. I don't know if we're gonna see icon swaps really soon. I feel like that might be something where as summer swaps is ending, maybe they'll run icon swaps. Or since this is summer swaps tokens, like this is set one, we're gonna have a set two as well. I believe it even says here on the menu. Yeah, summer swaps one. So we would expect summer swaps two to be out as well. We might be done with icon swaps for the year. That's just my initial thoughts based off of seeing this. But the rewards that we have inside of summer swaps with all of the crazy packs and stuff, honestly, if you think about it, is even better than icon swaps. With all of the shapeshift, their player picks, the fodder packs are dirt cheap. There's still icons that are available from it. So I wouldn't be that disappointed if they just said, nah, we're gonna take icon swaps out of this. The people that would be disappointed the most would probably be some of you guys that like to grind the menus a ton and have a lot of time on your hands and you're like, I would go and play those extra objectives for icon moments cards or for more fodder packs or whatever it may be. So I completely understand that point of view as well. But again, it's nothing confirmed. That's just me kind of thinking about how this looks and how that's objective setup seems to me. But still, the bottom line is it's crazy. We have 12 tokens now that are available for summer swaps. And of course, we went from having four to 12 at one time. So EA's given us plenty to do with that. And they've given us plenty to do with some pretty solid player picks. Some pretty solid player picks. We guessed it correctly. The 82 plus player pick returned back yesterday and it returned with the same requirements as well. I believe that gold rares are maybe up a little bit. I'm gonna try to get one of these player picks done just for the video. They were a bit sus yesterday. And by sus, I mean like they weren't giving out that great. I will say I have packed, I'm pretty sure it's three daily blends in the past 24 hours now. And that's a bit disappointing because not that daily blend is a bad player but I was just hoping for a little bit more. The fodder from these has been solid. And honestly, packing three daily blends makes me feel like there's at least a chance, as you can see, I have it on my own sign, that I can pack some other cards. On the stream yesterday, we were doing some share plays. I packed an Emory Chon from the 85 plus player pick and then two guys packed Adame Trey Ore from player picks as well. So we'll have to see how the luck is throughout the rest of this week. But at least we have a pretty nice player pick pack. I mean, if I'm getting an 85, that's not too terrible. That's kind of worth it, I guess, for my craft. It's like what, 10,000 coins? So about break even, I suppose. Maybe a little bit less than that. But that's the 82 plus player pick is really nice to grind this week. Again, like I said yesterday, there's so many SBCs that are craftable right now that we have a great opportunity to craft by using the menus, by doing the player picks. Now, we didn't get the 75 plus times five, which was, again, as we expected, just because I thought those were gonna be kind of related with that bronze and silver select with the other silver and bronze upgrades that were out and that was the case. So some people yesterday were like, man, this upgrade content is not as good as last week. And I understand that because last week we had a 75 times five and an 81 plus player pick. This week we just had the player pick. We also had the 82 to 88, but I think that most people don't do that one that often just because the 82 plus player pick has no rating cap. And it's just 82 and up. And of course, it gives you the chance at packing those very coveted shapeshifter cards. So that's kind of what's going on with that side of the market at the moment. Again, we talked about the USBC just being kind of overpriced. His card went on a massive fluctuation yesterday as well. Kind of an interesting tweet. A couple of other small things from yesterday. El Shadawi, last night on the video I was looking at him at what, like 300,000 coins, right? So this El Shadawi, EA tweets out yesterday on Monday and they say, hey, we messed up with the ratings on this card, which actually we should have noticed this from the get go. El Shadawi's, I think it was like his jumping and there was another stat. It was like agility and balance or something like that that they had the incorrect stats on. They were actually lower than his, than his road to the knockouts card. And so EA tweeted yesterday, hey, we're going to upgrade the stats on El Shadawi. They were released incorrectly. So this is going to be in game. And along with his normal like slight market rise that you saw in the morning yesterday, I think it actually helped El Shadawi's price go up a little bit more. As we were looking at him on the video, he was 300K. He went all the way up to 360, which is where I sold the ones that I bought of him. And now he's kind of back down, you know, like 10K, not really that much, but that was kind of a nice surprise, I guess. And I made a joke about it on Twitter yesterday saying, hey, this guy, a new trading method, right? Find a card that EA releases with incorrect stats and then buy it up because, you know, when they fix the stats, it'll rise just kind of as banter. But it was also kind of funny to see that happen yesterday. Kind of another one of those ways where EA technically made a mistake and they fixed it. So rightfully so with that El Shadawi moving. Now, speaking of shape shift, there's moving on the market. A lot of these guys are actually still up a little bit. Marcelo is four mil, Ronaldo is over 10 million coins. Like we saw with the El Shadawi rides, Ramos is up as well. Corona is up right now, Werner is up. So some of these cards, Adama as well, right? Adama was 510K. I sold mine at 580 something. He had a really nice rise yesterday as well from 500K all the way up to almost 600. You know, again, as I'm saying, it was a small rise yesterday, but if we continue to have really great SPZ content, if we would get an Ole Hero card, if we would get a Jamie Vardy and especially if we get more player picks, what it really comes down to content-wise is, what are those gamble SBCs are we getting that are good? The 85 plus player pick doesn't drain the bank too much for a lot of people. It's 80K, it's a bit expensive. A lot of downvotes here, right? But again, if we get that 93 plus tot slash shape shift to player pick or something like that, that's gonna be something that would drain the market of coins. If we get a year and review player pick again today, a lot of people love that SBC even though it's really not a good value pack. I mean, guys, you see a 50-50 upvote on this, it's really not a great value SBC. If you think about the cards that you're getting from it, if that is re-released today, that's probably gonna impact the market a bit even though I wouldn't really like the contents of that SBC more than just the gamble pack. So again, I think that a lot of these shape shifters still have room to drop. I know that some of them are up, like Ramos just got really rare right now. He's 1.7 mil. He's 1.4 mil on the Xbox. I think that he's overpriced on PlayStation after being 1.55. So if you've got a couple of these cards, maybe you've been trying them out. I don't think I would hold onto them for too long, especially if more leaks start coming out about like hero cards and maybe Ole or maybe a Ginola or stuff like that. If there's gonna be even more versions of heroes dropping this weekend, I think that would stir the pot a little bit in the market. Maybe not crazy, but I think it would stir the pot enough where you'd see these shapeshifters that are in packs right now drop off a bit. So I still think that if you're wanting to buy any of these for your team and you're trying not to lose too many coins that I would wait until later on this week. But that's kind of the thing. So what I'm doing right now is just trying to spend my coins through an upgrade packs and trying to hit one of these guys. There were multiple people on the stream yesterday that hit Adama. Couple people mentioning that they hit Ramos from player picks. Some guy hit Werner. And then a lot of the lower tier cards as you would expect, right? A lot of the Tierneys, the Arnadovich, the Blend. The Grealish that I bought on yesterday's video sold very nicely up at the high 400,000 coin range. And fodder, oh, I saw the screen you are that reminded me. SPC fodder to end things off in today's video did very, very well. If you bought it yesterday kind of on the video when we were talking about why is fodder down? There's just more demand coming. These cards kept going higher. The 84s from 4K all the way above to 5,000 coins and higher, 85s are like 9K plus. 86s are about 15, 16K. So those prices that we saw, where's my guy Scrinniar, right? Scrinniar last night was down at 13K when we bought him on the YouTube video. He was 13K here and boom, back up to 16, 17. Hold on to this stuff, seriously. I'm still holding on to some of the stuff that I've got. I think fodder can continue to go higher throughout the rest of this week. As of right now, one thing I talked about in yesterday's video too was like, guaranteed shapes you have their team two-pack. We have nothing added to the code at this moment in relation to anything like that. So still definitely watching the code updates and stuff like that. We have nothing related to that at the moment. So we'll see if that changes. But as of right now, today on Tuesday, we're looking at some other type of upgrade pack, more 82 plus player picks, probably another summer swaps token or two. And the big question mark is just gonna be what type of player SBC are they going to drop? Ole, Vardy, we'll see. Maybe there's another one in there that's not leaked yet that EA will throw in the mix. We will have to see. But a lot of excitement for the shapes you have to hero cards, especially if you see that card design begin to be added to the transfer market search query. That's what I would really watch for because that would tell me that I think there's something special common with if you see that in the market, because if it's just gonna be an SBC for Ole, probably not gonna see that search query or search filter quality, I guess is the right word in the menus. I think it would just be in like the club search, not on the transfer market search. So we will see if anything in that regard changes today. I hope Ole comes today. I'm kind of excited for that. And I hope EA drop more heroes as well, not just Ole, but hopefully they go beyond that and drop a couple more that haven't seen upgrades since the beginning of the game. Yay, we're looking at you, Ginoa. That's the guy that we want to see. So if you enjoyed today's video, hit the thumbs up on it, comment down below if you have any questions, and of course, subscribe if you are new. I'm gonna keep spamming 82 plus player picks and work on getting these objectives done because there's a lot of tokens to be claimed. There's a lot of shape shifters to attempt to pack. It's been Nate the foot accountant. I'll be catching you guys later. Peace out.