You follow it in and you believe that there is a way to bring about peace on earth in a form sense. You know, have a happy picture, have a happy ending in that sense. The Course is saying that you need to let go of your way of seeing the world as you see it in order to come to peace of mind, that the world was made as an attack on God. It's not like the world has elements of it that are very positive, just by flushing out all of the negatives that you will be left with a positive world, which is a common approach to say. A Disney world. Right. No problem. Michael Jackson, he made this imagery of all kinds of rides and everything, trying to make it there. Yeah. But it's, again, we started to get into the other night where there, it's kind of like anytime you're using the world or the body for the ego's purposes, it's an attack. But many of the ego's purposes seem to be quite nice and that's why there are many forms of attack that the mind doesn't recognize. So it still believes that they're helpful when it's really still attacking. Probably the most subtle and the most deceptive of all of those is what Jesus spends about nine chapters on, is the special love relationship. It seems to be a haven, you know, it seems to offer lots of good things, wonderful feelings of warmth and connectedness and, you know, you could say it's the old you and me against the world. But as the world, it seemed to be, we've got, like, barricades up because we've got a haven here and it seems very attractive and it's not seen that it's an attack, it's still an ego motive, we're still an ego motive behind it and that any attack, again, is an attack on God, it's attacking the, there's not an attack in truth but it's keeping the mind from awareness of truth and reality. So to me when it gets to non-conformized it really has come down to following it down step by step and really questioning what are the ways that I still, or what are the beliefs, what are the concepts, what are the ways of attack that I'm still not recognizing. Help me Jesus, help me understand what those are and help me lay them aside. I guess when I first heard that, I sort of slipped back into this thing of, you know how fundamental this is, you know, there's only one right way to do things and they are uncompromising in that way and I guess that's what I was speaking about at the time. Yeah, form and content, we talked a little bit about how a lot of ways that have been, like black or white thinking, have bogged down into form. This is the only way, this is the only path to reach God or these are the do's and the don'ts in form. You can't do these and go to heaven and these are the good things, the good deeds and you need to do lots of those to get to heaven and what we're talking about is non-conformizing in terms of thought or thinking. That in sense there is only one right way in the sense of right-mindedness. That's at the purpose level or at the mind level. That's contrasted with wrong-mindedness of the ego. So to get clear on that is really important and that's why we try to go very, very deep in all of our talks and discussions and when we get together to get down to a real discernment of right-mindedness versus wrong-mindedness so that we don't tolerate ego thinking in our own minds. And that's where I do my tolerance.  Every morning after meditations I relinquish those things from the Holy Spirit to us again. I see what's still value and I see what's so real. The question was before. Some of the passages in the Course where it just goes on, like one of them is Get the Lilies, I think, look at all the trinkets made to hang up on the body and you know, on and on. He seems to be getting awful specific. He's talking about clothes and jewelry and on and on and on. But it's kind of like what is it for? And to me the whole thing was going into the metaphysics. If I'm trying to draw attention to the body, then what am I teaching? You know, with some kind of what might be called risque, kind of clothing or different things. What I'm just more and more is, am I teaching my brother and myself that I'm a body and that attention should be drawn and focused on the body or am I focusing on the mind? Again, until you get to those metaphysics it may seem like what's the big deal, Jesus? Does it matter what I wear?  But for me it's one of those things where I just have followed it in. The intention. You know, I went from wearing, you know, browns and oranges and tans, the earth colors, to these bright vivid colors when I had my color analysis done and found out what colors look best on this body. And then I just had the best time. I mean, I love wearing these dramatic colors. And I love wearing really fun earrings. And I got lots of attention from people. People were invariably commenting on my earrings because they were so different. You know, or talking about how bright my clothes were. And I just ate it up. You know? But at some point when I, you know, looked at this very thing David's talking about, it's like, wow, what am I doing here? What is my intention for wearing these fun earrings and these bright clothes? Well, the intention was to get exactly what I was getting. The attention to the body. And when I decided that I really wanted to put my attention on my mind and therefore I wanted to, you know, like model that, then it was been congruent for me to continue wanting to get attention from my body by using jewelry and bright colored clothes for that purpose. Perfumes and low cut dresses and so on and so forth.  It's the purpose. Is it the body or the mind? And you can also add on to that is when you go and you meet with people, you know, flattery is something that's really interesting to take a look at.  If you really look at the life of Jesus and read about it, his apostles were saying in the Euransia book, you know, he was not a flatterer. Jesus did not go around complimenting and flattering like you would think. And again, it makes perfect sense from the metaphysical perspective because he was interested in their minds. He was interested in their thoughts and them coming to purity of thought and he didn't put his attention onto the body. He didn't focus on the sicknesses even, the types of sicknesses, and leprosy or dead for three days like that. You know, to me it fits again into this thing of means and end. You know, Jesus is saying, if you use the body as your end, if you want to keep all the pleasures, the conveniences, the comforts, the niceties of the world, what is the receptor of that? It's the body. It gets to enjoy all that good stuff, so to speak, in the world. And the mind is a slave to work, to be trained, trained for jobs, educated sometimes for many years to get jobs, to make money, so that the body can get the bucks and all the comforts and conveniences. And Jesus is saying, well, it's got to be turned around 180 degrees. Your goal should be peace of mind and you should want to use your body and everything that you perceive in the world around you as a means to help bring about your peace of mind. Wow, that's a complete turnaround than the other way. And it's one of those things that too, it seems like a loosening and a gradual turnaround. For me, it wasn't something that just like one day I was reading about means and end and went, oh, I get it! One of those things but it seemed like just a little bit of questioning in the situations more and more. What is my purpose here? Why am I going to great lengths to earn this money or to go to to do extreme things for what? The clothing thing, I'm thinking of an example because I wanted to say there are some people that will go wear black or get a mohawk or not shave their legs, you know, because they think that's a way of saying a statement. But I think there's a place where wherever you are teaching you do kind of fit in and not draw attention one way or the other. And I'm thinking about it at the Zen Center when I went and it was time for the service to wear black. So I wore the closest thing to black I could but I had orange socks. Everybody has black socks so everybody looked at me. It immediately drew attention to me and from then on I asked my girlfriend does she have black socks and she didn't have any and so I kind of had to let that go but I remember feeling it was drawing attention immediately to me because everybody was in black.  It's good that you bring that up because initially when you're starting to make this shift it's like if you're in a work setting and there's an appropriate professional clothing that you wear and you're just working on changing your mind you forget this lesson it's not helpful to go in there and some rags. It's simpler. That would really draw attention in the work setting. Then they don't want to hear what you have to say. And as you go on and on and on deeper and you really attempt to give up the world then it will come more and more I think word simplicity and things you won't necessarily be giving talks to boards and directors and everything they'll be disciples sitting around you with the training of the level of the mind and it reminded me too of the yellow one today I was reading a little bit of the Siddhartha a book that Herman Hess wrote and they were saying that all of the followers of the Katama Buddha and everything that were following him hundreds and hundreds of them in this book were all going around in their yellow pronunciation robes so you have this forest with all these talking around with these bright yellow robes or whatever but again, we're just trying to That's right For me it came in the form many times of experimenting which made it fine for me in a sense and it also put parameters on it for me well there's any number of things I could probably do for a few weeks or whatever and it would just be a way of me getting in touch with what my beliefs and feelings are around something so instead of saying well, you know, it's like you're going to say good bye not to do this or not to do that that would have been ridiculous and that would have been trying to change the form or the behavior before the change had taken place in my mind and yet I found experimenting with the form was a way to get a closer look at or it would seem to bring up for me some of the beliefs and the feelings that went with it when I stopped wearing makeup what I did was we went on a trip and I thought well, you know this would be a good time to do that because I think I felt like I'll never see these people again anyway they don't know what I usually look like with makeup on anyway so they're not going to say oh my gosh you're feeling okay today you look really pale, you know and so it just seemed like a real appropriate place and it was really easy I never wanted to mess with makeup anyway really it always felt like too much to bother and so for six weeks I didn't wear any makeup just to see how that would feel and how I would feel about myself without makeup on it was real helpful that's where you get the joy that it does thinking about your hitchhiking well what happens usually is when I experiment I don't choose to go back and I may, but a lot of times I haven't chosen to go back into my old way of doing it because I've had a chance to look at why I was doing it and what it would feel like not to do it and just work through some of that stuff and so then I don't really need to I don't need the old way to bring you tremendous fear I didn't say out of fear I was thinking about your hitchhiking because that was an experiment in a way because it was the first time you could tell that story I went down to the trailer and left the car down there and hitchhiked back and I never hitchhiked before we have picked up hitchhikers before and traveling and I've kind of been in that respect related to hitchhiking but not as a hitchhiker and you know, it had been suggest you you you you you you you you


What I find repeatedly is a strong interest in libertarianism as a concept, as a philosophy, by people. And the reason they're interested, they say, is because it's consistent, it's logical, it's principled. And then they talk about the libertarian party, and many of them tend to be much more hesitant about the libertarian party. They find that it doesn't, to them, seem as principled as they think libertarianism should be. And on the other hand, they don't think it's enough of a political party, which may or may not be a contradiction, but I think those are interesting observations. The same people who are very committed to becoming or being libertarians because of its principled and logical stand find the party, on the one hand, not principled enough, and on the other hand, not political enough. And I think there are reasons for that. I think that it's a good deal, a result of needing more intensive analysis. I think that political issues can be identified that can be both principled and political. I think one example is the 16th Amendment, obviously, the immediate repeal of the progressive income tax is both something very, very popular and at the same time very principled. And I think there are a number of other issues that are similar to that. Now, an area that is an area that people find difficult to deal with and difficult to analyze is foreign policy. And I think one reason that even libertarians have had trouble doing that is that they have not looked at foreign policy as part of an overall philosophical system. They're not knowledgeable about it and therefore they feel it's some sort of special category and therefore some special ideas apply. And that's always seemed strange to me because I've always had an approach based on my overall philosophy drawn from Mises and Hayek. And that philosophy gives us, I think, the insights to deal with any issue in politics, that is, whether domestic or foreign policy. And that Hayekian view of the world and that world including international relations is a view based on Hayek's fundamentally important distinction between law and legislation. If we think of Hayek's magnificent career where starting after World War I becoming a very, very important economist but coming to economics out of a broader political and social theory background, even a sociological theory background, and then contributing to the great breakthroughs in economic thought in the 1930s which placed the Austrian school at the very pinnacle of intellectual importance. And then the recognition that Hayek drew from the fact that despite the consistency of the Austrian economic analysis, it was not accepted, instead Keynesianism was accepted because people weren't interested necessarily in truth but in things that were able to provide political power. And he began to realize that the quest for political power was the central driving motive in politics, not truth, not the welfare of the population but the welfare of the political establishment. And that led him to write his crucial book, The Road to Serfdom, pointing out that that road had already been well traveled and that American and European society had better make a quick decision about whether it wanted to continue on that road or not. And as a result of his recognition of the political sphere as more important than the economic sphere, he began writing the important works that were published in the 1950s, the Counter-Revolution of Science and especially the Constitution of Liberty. And in developing that book, The Constitution of Liberty, Hayek came into personal contact with Bruno Leone. Bruno Leone was the professor of jurisprudence at the University of Pavia. He was the editor of the important classical liberal libertarian journal Il Politico. And in addition, he was a frequent lecturer at seminars in the United States that Hayek was also speaking at. And his lectures and his analyses have been published and provide a very strong approach to the whole question of law. The book Freedom and the Law presents the analysis of Leone which makes this and historically justifies the distinction between law and legislation. That freedom is based on law and tyranny is based on legislation. And Hayek then, inspired by that, has written his trilogy Law, Legislation and Liberty, showing the close connection between law and liberty on the one hand and legislation and tyranny on the other. Now Hayek's crucial distinction drawn from Bruno Leone is that law is what societies develop, what has evolved over many centuries. It is a few general principles and that in the best circumstances these principles are enunciated through decisions of judges and that the Anglo-Saxon common law derived from Germanic law was the best historical example of that approach. But that all societies, to one degree or another, operate on the basis of law. These are customs, they are truths, they are wisdom and to the extent that societies are based on law they will be more free or less free. If they are more based on law they will be more free, if they are less based on law they will be less free. And Hayek demonstrates how in conflict with law has developed legislation. Legislation is the opposite of law. Law evolves out of consensus. Law evolves out of rules that everyone accepts. And as Hayek points out there are not too many of them but those that do exist are true and societies prosper when they follow those laws and societies suffer psychologically, morally and economically when they do not follow those laws. That is when they use legislation. So that legislation forms a constant warfare against law and that is because legislation is not the result of consensus. If there was consensus there would be no need for legislation. Legislation represents civil war. One group in society represented by one set of representatives imposes its will on another part of society. It is not the result of unanimity, it is the result of majoritarian decision. And majoritarian decision is a direct assault on law. So we see that modern society is more and more characterized by civil war. That all legislation is a form of civil war in which one side or another tries to establish hegemony and control over other people. And in Hayekian terms that is the very opposite of law. It is the very opposite of civilization because civilization can only exist where the rule of law exists. Civilization can only exist where liberty exists. And as he said we are on the road to serfdom and the road to barbarism. The more that our society is characterized by more legislation and the discussions around legislation the more our society is characterized by civil war. And the civil war is more insidious because it's more masked than the ordinary civil war taking place where there is direct violence. This is violence once removed, violence more subtle, systems of control that are more subtle. But that to Hayek grievous as it is is less important than the fact that it diminishes the value of law. The role of law in society is constantly reduced the more people approach problems from a legislative mindset. The legislative mindset is a mindset of interventionism. A mindset that says I know better than you what's good for you. A system based on law is based on individual autonomy and is based on the concept that each individual knows best his own interest. And that he will pursue it to his own benefit and if it isn't to his benefit he will learn from it so long as he does not do injury to someone else. The legislative mindset says I know better than you what's good for you. And you have then conflicts among legislators each one saying or each group saying I know better what's good for people and the other saying no we know what's better for people. The fallacy is of course that neither one should have that role. Obviously each one as individuals should be able to freely say everybody in the world is wrong except me and publish it if they can publish it or stand on a street corner and say it. That is obviously a reasonable thing but not to say you must do it. Only by education can people be one legitimately to a point of view by law that is totally illegitimate that is by statutory law or legislation. Now this set of approaches that is the approach of law where people choose their own destinies and legislation where their destinies are imposed on them one faction upon another has its application in the world of foreign relations. The Hayekian concept of law is manifest in the long tradition of international law. International law is a set of principles and concepts derived over many many centuries. Hayek himself has pinpointed as the crucial originating force of the ideas of Hayek in the 16th and 17th century. Those are the great Spanish and Portuguese philosophers of the school of Salamanca. Hayek's student from the University of London, Marjorie Grace Hutchins, has written two books under Hayek's inspiration on the Spanish philosophers and economics. Hayek has seen these as not only the forerunners of Hayek and Mises in economic thought but even more fundamentally in theory of law and especially international law. And so you have the great philosophers of the second half of the 16th and the first half of the 17th century such as De Victoria, Suarez, De Lugo, De Mariana who laid down the principles of law and especially international law that then were taken over and given wider currency by the great Dutch theorist Hugo Grosius. Now their concept of the rule of law and of international law was so important to Hayek that when in 1979 he as chairman of the Mont Pelerin Society authorized for the first time a meeting in Spain because it was the first opportunity after the death of Franco to hold a meeting in Spain. Hayek insisted that one day sessions be held at the University of Salamanca and that he would only speak at the University of Salamanca on the importance of the Salamanca School, the founders of modern international law. Now that international law has grown over the centuries. It was a law that our founding fathers were quite aware of and on which they felt that the Constitution of the United States itself was based. And that law continued to grow in the 19th century. In fact the 19th century was the century of flowering of international law because the 19th century was the century of flowering of classical liberalism. So that if any legal system in the world is closest to libertarianism it's the system of international law developed during the libertarian era of the 19th century. And if you read the writings of leading classical liberal spokesmen such as Cobden and Bright and William Graham Sumner and others, Di Malinari, Passe, the whole French school, you will find international law to be a central theme in their writings. And the approach and importance of international law reached its flowering at the beginning of the 20th century and not the least under the inspiration of one of our great but unsung statesman William Howard Taft who took the lead in associating the United States with international law with international arbitration, conciliation and mediation. And in doing so was opposed in 1912 for reelection by two notorious opponents of that philosophy, Theodor Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. And those two men represent just in opposition to Taft just as Taft represented the Hayekian concept of law and the rule of law, Wilson and Theodor Roosevelt represented the concept of legislation, the concept of tyranny, the concept of a majority imposing its will on a minority. Woodrow Wilson represents in American history the highest form of legislator. The man who could leave no one alone who wanted to pester everyone at home and abroad is the ultimate anti-libertarian. And his whole philosophy reeked of the legislator's mindset and nothing more became Woodrow Wilson than his support of the League of Nations because the League of Nations is the transference to the international sphere of the legislative mold in the domestic sphere. It is based not on law but on legislation. It is based on the concept of collective security which is another word for legislation. Now Woodrow Wilson discovered evil at home and abroad.  That just as, since all people are evil but some such as ministers, religious leaders are a little less evil, they at least can play a slightly more elevated role and similarly American government could be slightly less depraved than the rest of the world. Just as the leaders of the American government could give leadership to the depraved Americans, similarly they could give leadership to the depraved population of the rest of the world. And so we have the illustrious president intervening in Latin America and Mexico especially and then in Asia and finally in European affairs and finally that ultimate gift to us which was the invasion of Russia in the summer of 1918 which American armies invaded Siberia and northern Russia near Archangel and Murmansk which had the great consequence that along with the invasion of the British and the Italians and the French into Russia it rallied all of the Russian people who otherwise hated the Bolsheviks to support the Bolsheviks because they were the only ones standing up for Russia. Now this very issue came to the fore at that point because Wilson's actions, his intervention in World War I and his intervention into the Russian Revolution which helped to cement popular support for the Bolsheviks against the foreign intervention and support of the anti-Bolsheviks who would have been much better off and probably victorious if they didn't have the allies hanging on their neck. Given that situation the people who had originally been taken in by Wilson's point of view, people like Herbert Hoover who attended the Versailles conference with Wilson as one of his major advisors, Robert A. Taft who was Herbert Hoover's chief assistant and who had been taken in by Wilson's rhetoric rather than his father's own brilliant analysis, saw the error of their ways. They saw that legislation, intervention, legislation in foreign affairs is intervention by military means or by foreign aid, foreign military or economic aid that the consequences of that are the opposite of what is expected. In other words they discovered without giving it a name what Hayek has called the theory of unintended consequences, that everyone, all legislators intervene for good and yet they create evil. Every piece of legislation is done for a good purpose and yet the results are always evil. Legislation is done to help people and legislation destroys people. Hoover and Taft did not give a name to it but they discovered the consequences of this, that American intervention in World War I set a terrible price, that the Americans intervened at the point when the European powers were on the verge of a settlement. They were so exhausted they couldn't continue and if they had had a settlement the result would have been stability in Europe, that the war had gone on for half what the period had eventually took place, that terrible devastation had occurred but that the societies yet had not been totally ripped apart. By America intervening it ensured that one side would win and one side would lose but not that the war would immediately end, that the war would continue till one side was totally ripped apart, that societies, all the foundations of society, the law and morals on which societies are built would be ripped apart. And that occurred first in Russia and then in Germany and in central Europe. Those societies were ripped apart by the good intentions of America entering the war to help the world. Every legislator's dream and Hoover and Taft were horrified at what had happened and their role in that. And they saw the same thing happening with American and Allied intervention into Russia. By the intervention it not only made the anti Bolsheviks the tools of foreign invaders, it also prolonged the war and they discovered that war leads to socialism. War leads to socialist revolution. It leads to the organization of society along socialist lines in order to fight the war. They realized that that's what happened in America. Industries were nationalized. In America happily we were able to get out of it when the war ended. In other countries they didn't. They kept those industries nationalized. Or worse, they experienced the Bolshevik Revolution. In 1919 Herbert Hoover set up the Hoover Institution on War, Peace and Revolution in order to try to make people aware of the fact that just as peace leads to capitalism, war leads to socialism. And another way of putting it, the way Hayek ultimately put it, is law which is peace and capitalism is opposed by war which is legislation which leads to socialism. And that's why Hoover and Taft fought so strongly against America intervening in the Second World War. They knew that the American intervention in the First World War had created the chaos that led to the Second World War and also had given strength and power to the Bolsheviks, had created the Bolshevik state. And they predicted a Second War, especially if America intervened, would mean not a couple of hundred million people under communism, but more than a billion people under communism. They have been the only prophets whose predictions have come true and yet nobody pays attention to them. Because they said similar things about domestic affairs. If you read what Hoover or Taft said about Social Security and you read the papers for the last several months, you would know something about prophecy. They had very wide experience. They knew what they were talking about about Social Security or any of the other welfare and New Deal measures that have been put in. And they understood foreign policy. They understood the distinction between law and legislation. And they predicted that World War II could be short and the Soviet Union denied rewards and growth from it that communism would not expand if America stayed out of the war. But America going into the war with America's great industrial capacity, its great goodwill, would have the unintended consequences of prolonging the war. Prolonging the war would destroy society after society and as a consequence of destroying those societies, the only beneficiaries would be communism. Before Hayek or before Leone they had already seen in foreign affairs the opposition between war and legislation on the one hand and peace and law on the other. And they saw the concept of unintended consequences. And so when World War II came to an end, World War II with the massive American contribution, massive American goodwill translated into massive economic power, the consequence was that another billion people came under communist control. And they predicted that continuing that approach to foreign policy would lead to further gains by the communists. And those gains did occur, most especially in Vietnam where both Hoover and Taft warned against American intervention for the same reasons. That America's good intentions would have disastrous results. That the power of American economic and military activity in a prolonged war would so destroy society that people would turn to communism as the salvation. At the moment we see a great conflict going on in American politics, a conflict between legislators. The Democratic Party is par excellence the party of legislators. They love legislation on domestic and foreign issues. Although at the moment I would consider Senator Dole at the very bottom of any political totem pole morally and politically. He's the most despicable man in the Senate today. Yet in 1976 election when he ran for vice president he enunciated an important truth. That all four wars in the 20th century were democratic wars. The Democratic Party being the party par excellence of legislation applies that in foreign affairs. The Democratic Party is the party of foreign interventionism. And the consequences have been four horrible wars. The Republican Party has had a tradition based on William Howard Taft, Herbert Hoover, Robert A. Taft of much less legislative approach. Unfortunately the Republican administration is an administration that consciously embraced in the campaign and afterwards Democratic policymakers. Many of the important defense and state department officials are people who were Democrats and who thought the Democratic Party was insufficiently interventionist. And who supported Reagan and were rewarded by him. So we have the very horrible situation where neither political party stands for the important American tradition of law. Both stand for legislation. Now as in many other things a crisis of that sort at the same time provides an opportunity. That is the libertarian party is in a position to occupy that mainstream position that neither of the major parties is presently occupied. It is able to appeal to that large segment of the population who are independents, who do not find the Democratic Party's interventionism to their liking and at the same time do not find the Republican Party culturally to their liking. The Republican Party represents a very minuscule part of the population. More than half the population identify themselves as independents because they do not like either of the political parties. Of the rest the Democrats represent about a third of the population and then the Republicans a much smaller segment. And the reason is the Republicans in themselves people do not like to be associated with the Republicans they don't like the Republican Party and its leaders. Nevertheless in national elections the independents vote Republican more than they vote for the Democrats that is for president.  And so there is this huge segment this 50% or more of the population who hate the Republican and Democratic parties. They do not affiliate with them in the opinion polls and who in the opinion polls indicate a strong dislike for legislation. So that a political party that enunciates the concept of law and opposes the concept of legislation consistently both on domestic and foreign policies can have a strong opportunity to reach the voting public. Thank you.


Hi everyone, Joe for jatsby's casebreaks.com coming at you with a quick two-box break of 2020 Panini Immaculate football Two-box pick your team number 11 A lot of great stuff in here in Immaculate as you know Big thanks all of these folks for getting into the action. Thank you for buying your team straight up really appreciated on Wednesday the 13th Thanks Ramon for triple last spot mojo right there grabbing the last three teams There are some number blocks as well There was the Philadelphia Green Bay Dallas New England Pittsburgh New Orleans number block So it works just like our serial number breaks But only for that group of teams and only for this current break pick your team 11 And there was another set for the the highest end teams right here, too. All right Set that over here on my cart now We opened a fresh case yesterday, and I marked these boxes one two and three we did boxes to we did the two We did box to break to was the set of twos right there. We did number two. So now one and three are left We'll select a dying. We'll select that one right there One two three for the left side four five six for the right side, and it's four one two three four five six So break number one will save for pick your team 12 which we can do tonight folks We do have late night tonight. So we'll write pick your team 12 on these so 2 box 12 no fillers or anything like that for that yet We could sell this out straight up perhaps that right there. All right, so we're gonna be doing box three Group three I guess we'll call it Good luck everybody got a blockchain on the bottom. It looks like a redemption maybe in the middle. All right We've got Jordan Love Rookie patch autographs gold and that will be for the Green Bay number block group That's gonna be for Matt Medlin with zero mark. What's going on? Jason Jaspy is doing Instagram live right now as we speak I think he's in the middle of a break right now at Jaspy's breaks on Instagram folks box number one We've got two out of 25 TJ Watt for the Steelers Pittsburgh is a number block team Pittsburgh two is for Matt Medlin Remarkable relic Josh Jacobs 12 out of 25 apparently not getting charged for Do I don't know how he Dodged that bullet good friend the Robert Runkle and my Raiders got a quad relic of to a tongue of I love 31 out of 49 Miami is a number block team. So Miami won That'll be for Robert Runkle. There you go, Robert. I guess he wasn't that drunk Yeah, I guess that's what it turns out to be. Oh nice Devin Hester on card autograph not a redemption An NFL 100 on card autograph Devin Hester for Greg and the Bears We got rookie I black jersey 82 out of 99. Yeah, I think his I guess I guess his his alcohol content his His back was lower than the legal limit, but just got into a goofy accident coming out of the airport Ryan Harold Right on time Antonio Gandhi Golden Silver, Inc. I black autograph three color patch And we've got Jacob Eason one out of 99 for the blue horseshoes. That's gonna be for Josh proofs Well good I'm happy that That it wasn't wasn't anything worse for my Raiders. All right last one Sorry mark can't can't do that We're a team here once you're banned by one of us. You're banned by everybody. All right See what we got here.  I'm glad a I'm glad the Raiders got that got of the way early In fact, it kind of went under my radar too Sean jaspy came in was like hey looks like you guys just picked up like, you know, three defensive coaches from the Chargers And I was like, oh boy. I was like what really? He's like, yeah, look it up, but uh That's what it was Niko with the Ravens There's Jimmy G with out of 60 45 out of 60 So now the Raiders just need just need some players some defensive players And hopefully that cordon Gus Bradley can get the the most out of Out of them There's been with the Niners Niko with the Ravens by the way That raven that Raiders offense is already pretty solid So if they can just improve just their defense just a little bit more They went eight and eight with that awful defense So what could they do if they had a competent and a league average? I'm not even asking for a top defense There's Kishan Vaughn rookie eye black jersey with gold ink right here. That's pretty sharp 19 out of 25 for the Buccaneers Patrick Davis So imagine if the Raiders had a league average defense 24 out of 25 Patrick Queen That'll be for the Ravens. We'll see him this weekend Niko along with JK Dobbins Let's see if they advance Do they advance against the Bills? That's a tough matchup Two more here. We've got Joe Burrow 14 out of 25 rookie eye black jersey gold ink autograph That is pretty sharp Bengals are a number block team. Wow So that goes to Bengals four. We go by that digit right there Cincinnati four we're on to Cincinnati Roy Roy DiPetrio with that one. There you go, Roy That is awesome Sometimes you see you see him as a redemption. It's it's it's nice to see him With a live autograph there all right Last one is going to be his teammate T Higgins T Higgins 71 out of 99 Two-color patch and autograph for the Bengals And that's 71 out of 99. So Robert Runkel with Cincinnati one There you go. And there you have it ladies and gentlemen That was two box pick your team number 11 of 2020 panini immaculate football I'm Joe for jaskiescasebreaks.com. Maybe Justin Herbert or Tua in the other two boxes. Check it out jaskiescasebreaks.com I'll see you next time for the next one. Bye. Bye


2 Disney Classics go head to head this week as I battle the huge, horrible beast versus the disgusting, disfigured ginger, Ariel. Let's start with the leading ladies, Belle and Ariel, and I'm going to get this out of the way right away. Belle is the hottest Disney princess, bar none. She's got some class to her, some sophistication, but she also falls in love with an ugly wolf creature. So she's got a bit of a freaky side to her, which I enjoy. Belle's no slouch either, but I feel like she'd be more interested in collecting who's it's and what's it's galore rather than spending time with me. But with Belle I could sit down by a nice cozy fire, have a nice read with her, then throw on my wolf mask and take her in the back and go to town on her. I'm sure I've already crossed the line somewhere in this episode, but let's move past it.   I can't remember his name for the life of me, and I refuse to do any research going into this. On the Beast's side of things we've got a wonderful cast, we've got Chip, Mrs. Potts, the always douchey Cogsworth, the Devonair Lumiere, that rhymed, and it was an awful impression. And the villains on both sides are amazing, with Ursula being the raving bitch of the sea, and Gaston being the typical high school jock that never left his hometown who gave me wet willies in the third stall of the bathroom. I don't care what you are now, Garrett. I have a web show. I have a web show. I need to point out the Timothy Oliphant in the room, and that's that Gaston has three hot triplet sisters who basically throw themselves at him at any chance they get.  We have a tale as old as time versus a tale on a redhead.  Fortunately for her crazy old father, Maurice, she has more to deal with later when he gets her thrown into prison. Crazy old Maurice, eh? Crazy old Maurice is what Gaston says in the film. So you're welcome for the re-enactment. Come to think of it, we never do actually learn the Beast Prince's real name. So he's basically Edward Norden's character from Fight Club, and in death he shall be known as Robert Paulson. But I did some digging for you lovely folks, and it turns out his name is actually Prince Adam. My name is Adam, and I'm also a prince. So it looks like this thing with me and Belle, this little Sam and Diane thing we have going on, it was meant to be. Ariel's plot, on the other hand, is one of selfishness. She falls in love with some pretty boy sailor prince, trades up her tail for a pair of hot legs, and leaves the kingdom, leaving it under attack. Risking it all for some guy she barely even knows, instead of giving me a chance. Both these animated classics hold up wonderfully. Now of course Disney had to pull a Lucas on us, go back and change some of the effects in Little Mermaid, no more sex spelled in the water, no more priest raging boner during the wedding sequence, and I think that's a damn shame, we're missing key aspects of the film now. I wanted to know more about the priest and why he was so happy to see her. Or him. Yeah, we don't know, we'll never know now. The visuals really are a sight to see though, with light pouring into the ocean floor, beautiful musical numbers and beauty and the beast, and Little Mermaid. It's quite an accomplishment. Some of the most recognized Disney songs to date come from both of these movies, from Be Our Guest to Under the Sea, a little fun fact for you, an Adam fun fact. I used to rock that song pretty hard on my violin. We obviously can't forget Part of Your World, the showstopper for Mermaid, and also Kiss the Girl. I'm not huge on Kiss the Girl, but I get it. I get it. There's not a bad song on the Beauty and the Beast soundtrack, hell there's not even a good song. They're all flawless, from the opening number to of course Be Our Guest, all the way to Mrs. Pot's rendition of the beautifully sung, Taylor's Oldest Time, the cover, I can see myself dancing with Belle right now in the ballroom, nicely lit room, Gaston crying in the corner, Lumiere playing us out, Cogsworth, he's not comfortable with what's happening, but he's going to stand by and watch it, because that's the kind of guy he is. He talks a big game, but he's really a pushover. I don't know what I'm doing right now, if this is a dance, or just kind of go with it. It's all kind of go with it. Well here we are again, another debate well worth settling, which animated classic is the best, Beauty and the Beast or Little Mermaid, the one with the hot red head, Sebastian, or the one with the always gorgeous, always stunning, Gaston. Leave your comments below. More than just reviews, this is Movie Feuds. Thank you, shut it down. Taylor's Oldest Time, true as it may be, barely even friends, then somebody bends unexpectedly, just a little change. It's hard to say the least. Thank you.


No additional deer have tested positive for chronic wasting disease from samples collected this fall in southeastern Minnesota. The Minnesota DNR says nearly one-third of all deer harvested during southeastern Minnesota's first firearms deer season and the first three days of the second season were tested for CWD. Only two of the 2,866 deer tested returned positive results. Both were harvested about a mile apart west of Lanesboro in deer permit area 348. The DNR now is planning and implementing its CWD response plan which will include a December public meeting announcing that response plan details and continued opportunities for hunters in permit areas 347 and 348 to have their harvested deer tested. CWD is a fatal brain disease to deer elk but is not known to affect human health. Prior to the discovery the disease was only found in a single other wild deer harvested near Pine Island in 2010. If you've enjoyed this segment of Lakeland news please consider making a tax deductible contribution to Lakeland Public Television.


Good morning everybody I'm Tommy O'Brien company live from T F N N headquarters in St. Petersburg Florida it's Wednesday 10 a.m. Eastern time excuse me 9 a.m. Eastern time 30 minutes to go until that opening bell and we got markets right around flat territory right now you have S&Ps positive by two points trading at thirty one ninety seven that NASDAQ positive by six trading at eighty six twelve Dow Jones positive by sixteen points trading at twenty eight thousand two ninety nine start those things off this morning when a jump off to the VIX let me put this chart on a little bit shorter time frame the VIX with a twelve handle this morning as you'd expect markets right near record territory the VIX flirting with an eleven on Monday twelve oh six as we march this the full last full week coming into the Christmas holiday and man we're almost in vacation mode is this market just continues to creep higher start things off we'll jump over the charts we'll start it off with the Dow currently trading twenty eight thousand two ninety four just off the session highs that we had kind of between about four am and eight thirty a.m. just about twenty points higher than where we are right now NASDAQ one hundred just reaching that pre-market high as well eighty six sixteen about six points off that level S&P five hundred train a trading at thirty one ninety six almost made it up to thirty two hundred you back things up a bit you can see yesterday and even Tuesday early in the day climbing to thirty two oh three for the high crude oil sixty dollars and fifty seven cents we get the EIA number at ten thirty a.m. this morning for crude inventories gold pulling back a bit over the last two and a half hours gold was up there about fourteen eighty three trades down almost ten dollars now trading at fourteen seventy seven and the Euro U.S. dollar train at one eleven eighteen terms of what else you have happening out there a pretty historic day as you have the house set to vote on impeachment for the president would be only the third time that a president would be impeached that would be in the house you would see a trial proceed in the Senate which may happen in January excuse me weekly mortgage applications dropping five percent as rates flatten pretty interesting story out here I was reading this morning Burger King and a marketing ploy going to give away coupons for free impossible whoppers to anybody who is delayed traveling during the holiday season you're out there you're traveling unfortunately delays are bound to happen you can enjoy a nice meat free burger and FedEx the slide continuing earnings last night they cut their guidance down almost seven percent this morning on a cut of that forecast looking to open about one fifty one stay tuned folks we got Basil Chapman filling in for Larry Pezzavento live at nine a.m. I'll be back at ten o'clock with Tom live programming all day stay tuned folks will be right back.


on your screen guys please take your time while solving it don't really jump on to any conclusion not straightforward solve this question it's not straightforward first question is good people are taking some time to solve that's nice so tough options are tough okay so oh no oh no that means you you you when you look at the solution you will be I don't know let me let me express the solutions or okay cursing don't curse me very very easy now learn learn only seven people could get it but then see intensity will go up intensity will go up so please brace for you know all that so hey they go how to solve this one now look at look at the screen all of you now understand how to how to do it so it was this expression given and there was a hint in the question itself that there is a power three okay so power three is there so you have to cube it but then cubing directly will not help you have to write this can I can I do that can I do that this is what you have to then what you need to do is you need to cube both sides right right so hence now don't see this is now no no chatting in no chatting right now then you lose the purpose we all lose that purpose the question is that these kind of questions will be there it is very much within your syllabus or whatever you can call it it's related to cubing of binomials which we have studied you could not get it at the right moment and hence someone who would have done these kind of problems will be ahead of you so I don't want any of my students to be like that so no one should be ahead of you guys so please pay attention how these problems are solved mathematical manipulations you have to learn so nothing beyond this we are going to do right don't you know how to cube how do cube cubing is first term is x cube second is minus one by three whole cube so let me write a minus b formula is a cube minus b cube minus 3 a b a minus b right this is the formula for minus b cube I am going to use only this right so x cube minus this then what minus 3 times a which is x in this case is 3 to the power 1 by 3 correct and then a is x minus 3 1 by 3 right and on the right hand side what will you get you will get 3 to the power minus 1 right nothing beyond this then what x cube minus 3 minus what will this be 3 x 3 1 by 3 and see x minus 1 by 3 to the power 1 by 3 was nothing but 3 to the power minus 1 by 3 did you understand this step this was a crucial step from here this step was very crucial x minus 3 1 by 3 is equal to 3 okay so the moment you see this I wrote this and the problem is solved okay see what will this be x cube minus 3 minus 3 and this entire quantity is 1 3 to the power 1 by 3 into 3 to the power minus 1 by 3 okay so minus 3 x is equal to 1 by 3 multiply entire thing by 3 what will you get 3 x cube minus 9 minus 9 x is equal to 1 okay so what is 3 x cube minus 9 x is equal to 10 right 3 x cube minus 9 x is equal to 10 correct below all good all good understood so hence hence instead of how do you ace these kind of questions how do you ace these kind of questions first stay calm because if your mind is restless you will not be able to solve and trust me friends exam conditions are exactly like these panicky you know and you are you know your hands will have full of sweat and all that don't panic and if you lose focus you lose it yep there will be okay let's see how many of you got it because you are you lose focus because you keep on your focus is on chat box hence if your focus is on the question you will be able to solve did we use anything which you didn't know 1 by 3 this is 3 to the power minus 1 more cubing both sides did you understand I cubed both sides LHS RHS both sides so the person who asked who asked this question did you get it yes I got it yep okay next let's see the leaderboard first leaderboard only seven got it mostly people that I've guessed I believe okay so freedom Jhagrav okay good nice okay very good let's go to the next can be good next question what or no what irrespective of that you must know how to solve the question the do those who are if at all there is a bot it's his call how does he want to plan for his life okay for her life hmm solve this this shouldn't this should be easy very easy question now first was the eye opener next is this should be very easy year 2020 is there any role of this 2020 year 2020 please read it carefully signs are traps okay let's see what is the oh no oh no why what was that many people did not see the sign negative sign did did you did you already do not see the sign this sign did you see the sign those who could see the sign it was very easy it was so easy did not see easy most of you so that 20 people who have not got it they have made this mistake these be option be those who have written be because too many numbers so here is where you have to you didn't need to do anything when you saw that question this is a this is be so if you are this is again a and this is again be so the question is a minus be whole square minus a minus a plus be whole square this was the question right so a square plus b square minus 2 a b right minus a square minus b square minus 2 a b so the answer is minus 4 a b right minus 4 a b and a was x to the power 2020 b to the power 2020 everywhere these two terms were same so there was no difference at all only difference was minus 4 4 minus 2 2 ruled out ruled out ruled out minus 4 a right so so our doubt where did you get the minus 4 so minus 2 a b plus minus 2 a b add did you get it now clear yes all all clear everyone clear on this this was so simple only identity to be used was this if you are not careful with the sign then obviously it is going to give you some pain right silly mistake again say sorry if each one says each one should say sorry to each one say sorry all of you those who made mistakes say sorry say sorry come on right don't repeat this problem or issue again okay but when you say sorry feel also today eat half a chapati less why right or tomorrow do the dishes mom tomorrow or clean the mop hey what is that clean the floor mop the floor a little bit more right oh you finished it Harita finished eating so her her punishment is she will mop the floor of her room everyone who made a mistake your punishment okay chalo next so eat eat don't don't cut down on your eating do some extra physical work so Jadoo look out Jadoo at your home next question okay so this was the new then we can we is leading why God can we how come you're on top great maintain it and who else is not that behind Russian Tarun Krithika Risha Nishant Rishabh Dima he and Jagra let's go to the next question what is 26 26 is what observe the more you observe so many people are 26 how come observe observe observe observe identity trap observe identity trap observe identity trap observe identity guest there are guesses are generally correct when you look at the solution you will laugh at yourself and again I will make you say sorry very easy see the questions will not be straightforward in my centum are don't expect questions to be straightforward I will make who's who's this oh no why answer is 125 no answer is zero zero was the answer zero was the answer zero was the answer zero and it was so simple our question 61 beautiful number a prime number 61 is equal to x minus 4 x square if I would have written you written given you like this you would have cracked in no time is it if I would have given you like this you'd have cracked it no time so this is x cube minus 4 cube so can we repeat this so I simply took this term and multiplied here simple so won't the given expression look like this right and this would be simply 61 is equal to x cube minus 64 so x cube is equal to what 125 isn't it isn't it so x is 5 if x is 5 x minus 5 is 0 how many how many how many steps say sorry again can't talk back right sorry say sorry those who did not get it say sorry sorry to everyone apologize yes you should apologize and one more floor to be mopped tomorrow and send me pictures while you are mopping the floor those who made the mistake okay no keep your words please mop the floor tomorrow half half of your house how did you know people get it wrong because I also got it wrong when I was in your age so I know you are like me so you will make the same mistake okay next next question before that okay very good very good very good folks that means you are paying attention if at all if you're not guessing it you just stay focused only on that screen where the question comes if you you know who's saying who's and what is it yes sorry someone is saying something anything any problem guys can we proceed yes now you understand practice makes a woman perfect okay so please hence so many worksheets there on the learnest okay next obviously man and women both from one issue asked to hence I said women women are already perfect see Arushi is bang on target great stay stay perfect always but still some bit of practice will improve your status let's solve this one so that dot dot dot means all those terms are continued for example 100 minus 99 times 100 plus 99 99 minus 98 99 plus 98 then 98 minus 97 right all there is this is series series of such some that dot dot dot means it continues till that so I hope you got it through say easy easy ZZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ region says easy ZZZ ZZ nishant easy ZZ so number of ZZ sir sir but do you see ABCD option no sir I don't see that I'm reload reload don't worry about your course it will be there reload solve solve solve solve solve sir again if you if you when I solve this again I will make you say sorry so macho don't expect straightforward questions please put some thoughts behind it some thoughts very easy very very easy very very easy see most of you have got it cool that's nice that's nice that's nice very good you have to just observe observe what is this identity is this an identity yes or no identity what is that identity 100 square minus 99 square okay next next term what is plus 99 square minus 98 square here itself the you know trick was and it would continue till minus 3 square plus 3 square minus 2 square plus 2 square minus 1 is it and beautifully this is going going gone gone gone gone gone gone gone and what is left 100 square minus 1 square so this is 1 double 0 double 0 minus 1 so 9 9 9 9 is equal to 9x so x 11 11 11 right got it so why 9x why 9x because here is 9x okay sir trapped that it's trapped okay cool so answer is right right clear no doubt no doubt any problem in this quiet question no doubt say sorry those who could not get say sorry sorry to everyone overlooked 9x Nitya so you are here in Centaur traps all around come on shallow good Tharon is fastest as well as highest okay next after this question after this question now the question has been displayed I'll take the doubt again no focus on chat whether you finish early or late world doesn't care you please solve and get it correct corona is not going to go back go back just because you got it right or fastest please try to solve and save the world 10 years down the line no chat focus on the question no chat raga whether it is easy or not no one will right now I can see lots of people are distracted no chat no chat here all of you just focus solve once 30 seconds are left then you can chat focus many people are getting distracted because of that chat itself I can understand so focus focus focus focus guys listen easy or hard stay away from chat telling you focus focus not focus focus now you can chat no many people have this issue of while solving they will see a who what is the world doing people are involved in more than what the world is doing rather than their own stuff so right okay easy question it is very very easy I hope most of you have valid oh still 23 people got the sign incorrect ha ha ha sign incorrect very easy again very very easy a minus root t you root 2 you have to just do this the moment I saw 5 okay the moment I saw 5 I was tempted to take it on the other side anyways I'll square okay now square 2 plus 3 got 5 minus 2 root 6 a square sorry plus 2 root 6 so a square minus 2 root 6 and 1 2 3 step over 1 2 3 step over right where are we using some out of the world formula here yes I know you made a mistake with sign I know that's where that's why I gave these questions I have taken some 9200 minutes preparing this so that you guys are aware but every time we are seeing that my efforts are going down the day don't get depressed so if I am not depressed you can't be depressed okay I wanted everyone should get correct option but then never mind show like don't worry don't worry stay spend time but then every time you make a mistake you have to say I have to realize then otherwise there's no problem there's no improvement realize realize that right okay next I should tell me frankly have we used anything which is beyond your learning have we used anything which is beyond your learning everything is within the scope of whatever you have learned you're just not focusing enough never mind chalo next question again fresh start don't look at look at the question and then just solve the order of the terms will be changed it will be shuffled just to check whether you lose cool or not that's what the test is about so situation would be at worst you have to make it align to your comfort and that you can do so no no no don't take extreme steps your dinner and all should not be skipped you should rather oh my god oh my god oh my how many if you got it right very good now see this was again very very simple question I don't know usually in the textbook you will see the question would be given like that right this is the format textbook correct but then I deliberately change it like that so that you become a little uncomfortable okay and that's where they will be testing you okay so x minus 1 by x is root 3 so hence you have to simply do what square game over no nothing more am I right so what is this x square then plus 1 by x square minus 2 is 3 so what happened hold on hold on hold on hold on hold on hold on don't don't write so much I won't be able to read that much correct now simple you have to simply subtract for right done is that problem out of your knowledge was this problem out of your knowledge so where is the problem where is the problem see everything you know right it was so easy right now so you have to just again problem lies within you know the fact that you are not again don't be impatient take time don't worry again no problem don't get depressed and all you will get another chance similar question Tanya saying these questions are not good at all so why do you keep such questions no it's not about your cerebellum brain and IQ and all that it's about focus and attention and you know just concentration nothing else you can all solve it okay chalo next question silence now focus okay okay which identity was which identity was used which identity oh most of you have got it correct that's cool nice who do you are you know randomly mugged oh my god never mind so there was an identity here there are cubes can you why do you see yes why do you guess don't guess 1 0 2 4 cube minus 512 cube minus 512 cube right is that understood so yep this is the denominator is this much now can anyone tell me what kind of identity is this what I need you have anyone on what is a cube plus a plus b plus c is 0 right what is a 1 0 2 4 what is the minus 512 cube twice because there was 2 d r did you not notice hence hence right okay what is this oh my god someone is screaming like anything okay so a b and c the meme oh is it I see so then don't you think this is 3 what what is what was the identity guys if a plus b plus c is 0 then what happens to a cube plus b cube plus eq it becomes simply 3 a b c correct so hence it will be simply 3 times 1 0 2 4 times minus 512 times minus 512 why because they were are adding up to 0 see 1 0 2 4 plus minus 512 minus 512 is 0 okay so 3 into 2 to the power 10 and then 2 to the power 9 into 2 to the power 9 the minus sign will get minus into minus plus correct so this is 3 2 to the power 28 this is in the denominator guys what was in the numerator 3 so what is this 2 to the power minus 28 and hence 2 to the power minus x is 2 to the power minus 28 so x is 28 below did we use anything again beyond your was it so so bad that you have to scream like that don't scream your vocal vocal box will get ruptured even if it is mean oh okay well why last 2 of them so where do you get these questions from ma'am I make it myself clear I think you forgot sir is an alien come on folks don't don't just be like that so hence the the thing is not now but sooner you understand my thing is that you know don't hide it like that in life will the traps tell you that hey here is here am I come avoid me I should I should identify the trap and tell you hey here is the trap that's that's what we don't have an adult brain like your don't tell us where the trap is usually only adult brains are equipped to face the trap yes sir okay she gets all you'll be trained sir make options easier see still people are but you learn are you learning or not next time when similar questions are there in any of these platforms will you be able to do it yes or no yeah that's the main objective dear forget about whatever is happening okay so learn learn learn again this requesting one and all please learn again the same thing here same identity so I hint I'm giving you hint also same identity now solve the identity which are you which we used the identity which we used in the previous question same identity here deploy it get the value quick oh no little sim similar identity so I'll correct myself similar identity not same the theme remains the same there was a condition the condition remains the same oh come on don't get demotivated it's easy are a Baba I actually let me tell you one story then do you know I have failed in computer science exam in my 11th grade did I tell you this story in my 11th grade I was I had failed in computer science exam so hence this don't take it as demotivating I didn't know I guess tell me computer exams are like the easiest exam and that too I failed just imagine how dumb I would have been computer science is what extended sir B&D option are same oh is it sorry so anyone but that was not correct anyways B&D was same huh very hard correct but that was not the option so you could have guessed it okay sir my thing kicked me out of the question 30 seconds before it ended oh I'm really sorry for that so was this question again similar yes or no how many of you got it 25 people got it actually no problem okay so yes any how many of you didn't get it again this was very very simple the moment a square plus B square plus C square is there which identity comes to your mind the identity which comes to your mind is a plus B whole plus C whole square right so this is a square plus B square plus C square plus what twice AB plus BC plus CA see even if you are not getting it correct don't worry these problems you are learning no different types of problems that's cool that's that's at least that is some take away from the session so please at least focus how are these problems approach that so the moment I see this problem I the moment I see these three squares I am tempted to use again again guys guys guys please then the purpose gets defeated please requesting all of you then the purpose gets defeated so we need to learn different types of varieties of questions and you know just imagine in 10 days time you learn 120 different types of varieties of question is it something which is really good to learn so you your database is going up so please at least that is one advantage right now look at now no no no here here here Arushi again then please requesting guys guys guys requesting all of you focus the main main agenda is oh then we again stop stop stop no one was like that I told you right I failed in my grade 11 okay so hence nothing is correlated like that you this is outright insulting please don't do that can can I have some focus then the winner when we are losing the losing the plot please don't do that okay here now focus focus come again come you know come come come to the screen guys so they go a plus B plus C whole square is equal to this I have to find this one learn the method no how to approach so I have to find this out right so a plus B plus C has to be there now if you see a plus B plus C is coming out to be 0 how first a is 10 by thousand right B is minus 6 by thousand and C is minus 4 by thousand so if you add all of them it is going to be 0 so this is 0 so this is 0 so what does this mean a square plus B square plus C square will become minus twice see if you want all simple simple questions kindergarten questions I can get those questions also but then the idea is to make you learn here not to make you feel happy that you are able to solve all the questions that's also there but then here yeah so you can calculate if you can calculate faster but see isn't a square plus B square plus C square is this minus twice AB plus BC plus CA so simply minus 2 AB was 10 by thousand B was minus 6 by thousand okay then B was minus 6 by thousand C was minus 4 by thousand and then plus C was minus 4 by thousand and this was 10 by thousand right isn't it so what is this sum then minus 2 minus 60 by thousand square then minus plus 24 by thousand square and minus 40 by thousand square right so hence what is it minus 2 times minus 76 by thousand square correct so hence it was times 76 by thousand square which is 152 by thousand square and someone had pointed out that two options were same correct these two options were same right and you could have seen that it could not be thousand in the denominator either this one or this one it would be correct and you could have guessed by the options also right you can guess by options how a is so big so a square this quantity has to be this quantity has to be greater than 0 why all our squares sum of square is always greater than 0 so this is ruled out anyways isn't it sum of three squares can it be negative never so hence it has to be either this or these two you could have guessed that these are same so obviously ruled out so you could have done this way as well okay so 25 people got it correct let's see the little board cool so Nishant is leading oh Kaveri great good work next chill very easy question again there is no role of 2020 no no I did not do it purposefully I had some other maybe why it was by mistake so while see framing the option is more difficult than the question because it has to be near right near the actual one I think there's some problem on my and it again oh you are on a mobile phone or a PC PC you can try mobile but then you lose but then try doing both try participating through both okay good majority of you 50% of you have got it correct right again five not five 2020 were just to distract you it was very easy question right so you have to basically find out this this is nothing but 1010 minus x1010 and this is one upon x1010 plus x1010 right so you have to just find out these two individually multiply get it get the answer okay how to find that out square this hence this was given square it what will you get you will get x1010 plus 1 by 1010 plus 2 is equal to 4 right so hence x1010 plus 1 by x1010 is equal to 2 so this item is no problem but what about minus you have to get minus so square both sides again so you'll get x 2020 plus 1 by x 2020 plus 2 again is equal to 4 correct so that means x 2020 plus 1 by x 2020 minus 2 is 0 and that's where the fun lie right so this is x1010 minus 1 by x1010 whole square is 0 game over right so this guy is this guy takes it down this is 0 is it clear clear what is it it means what ywt what is ywt okay all clear anyone any difficulty understanding playing with the same format see lots of question we have discussed of this former if x minus 1 by x is given how to go to x plus 1 by x word is what is eat eat eat means what never mind chalo what expression of enthusiasm oh my god chalo next okay so who's leading oh kaveri is kaveri is leading good good good great very good well done well done next next question this I have done in class at least in my class I have done if you don't get it then I'll have to fast for one day if indranagar hsr kormangala people and raja negar also we did yes if you guys are not able to do this then I'll have to stay hungry for one full day as a token of penance penalty I have to inflict on myself I don't want to obviously I want to eat daily why would I want fast no one wants to eat you know fast but then for penalizing for some misdeeds you have to take you have to observe fast it's healthy at times once in a while you should do it don't eat salt that day eat only fruits but not for kids you are not you're healthy it's what we people self hate is known who's saying I'm hating you have to hold yourself accountable for all your misdeeds and hence go through the penalty I hope you remember this question very simple see an obvious answer also okay so last three four seconds very good okay now oh no heart breaking heart breaking so you just remembered the answer so are you going to fast now I love to fast no yes so but then the result is totally opposite so I think most of you remembered the answer and you marked it but I am not confused yeah so I had some devil in you know intent in my mind yes so I had in the class in the class I had given you the reciprocal of this and I just flipped it yes I just flipped it why because some difference has to be there okay so it is very easy again don't wait me Ashish now if you see again numerator let's take numerator first so clearly a plus b plus c is adding out you know you know the you know the identity right a cube plus b cube plus c cube is equal to 3 a b c when a plus b plus c is 0 and both in numerator and denominator it is coming out to be 0 so numerator is 3 a minus b b minus c c minus a and denominator is 3 a square minus b square b square minus c square c square minus a square correct so hence if you see the denominator is nothing but this 3 and this 3 will go so a minus b b minus c c minus a divided by a minus b a plus b b minus c b plus c and c minus a c plus a correct right so hence gone gone gone gone gone so what is left 1 upon a plus b b plus c c plus a so don't remember answers you are not supposed to become robots okay chalovi next leaderboard as a next quiz pukka easy more question easy one okay no traps next math squeeze more number of question easy ones right you remember the answer okay got it nice next more number of questions but very very easy chinnu munnu questions next quiz man let's keep around 20 on bane ga karolpati type question general awareness general awareness in mathematics questions okay general general awareness in mathematics for example which is greater 11 is greater or 9 is greater right sample questions ah they go correct answer very good so these kind of questions okay you have to you have to answer in five second each each question five second rapid fast hundred questions in one hour very easy hint again can you see there is a cube are very easy our cube cube it is cube cube the answer the the this thing itself is attracting cube it is cube a cube a cube was the hint ah most of you have got it that's nice so the hint was very this was hint cube so that means you have to use and you know binomial cube so simply a minus root 3 is equal to 1 right and then cube both sides so this is a cube then minus 3 a square root 3 see second term plus 3 a root 3 square c third term minus root 3 cube is equal to 1 right so this is what was asked for a cube minus 3 a square root 3 plus 9 a correct which is equal to this item will be equal to 1 plus root 3 cube is 3 root 3 okay so what is x 1 what is y 3 so what is x into y 3 right was it difficult how many steps did I write anyways 3 and how to solve such questions cube was the hint either it could be binomial cube or a trinomial cube trinomial cube anyways that's exactly my purpose here that I want I want to drive this point to all of you that mathematics is about exploration it's not about who won the first battle of panipat you have to explore it's not you know only fact okay shallow never mind after sometime you'll guess to it you'll you'll be sorry you'll be used to it so don't worry the purpose is to learn right or just only you know if I give you easy question you'll always been but that will will you you know learn anything by that mechanism so hence last question of the evening folks ready very very simple to end the question very very simple to end the session simple question to end the session very very simple question which of the following is or are a prime number so identities are also used to prove but whether a particular number or expression in numbers the prime or not so identities come in handy so big numbers are prime or not you can very easily say if they are in particular format that's the learning learning is not whether I got it correct or not this is the last question of the evening yes only elimination no when I'll solve this you will you'll see hint is prime numbers do not have factors okay oh no oh no oh no oh no none of them are prime numbers yeah none of them are prime numbers because this is 200 minus 1 200 plus 1 so there are factors and this is anyways even even even all are even so this is an even number how can this be prime and this one is 10 to the power 3 square minus 3 square can be written as 10 to the power 3 minus 3 times 10 to the power 3 plus 3 all of them have factors this is there are two factors there are even means two is a factor this is a factor this is a factor all of them have factors yes obviously composite but let's say it was question like prove that that's a subjective question PRMO 19 to the power 4 plus 4 is this a prime number yes or no how would you know is this a prime number 19 to the power 4 plus 4 is a prime number yes or no right how do you know it's not a prime number then if using the if you go to learn this I have given you one identity I don't know whether you have learned this in learners I have a video on this sophie germain identity if you see this you will be able to prove that this is not a prime number correct this was our regional matter it's in identities algebraic identities it was asked in rmo around 1900 something in 1990s it was asked regional mathematics olympiad 1990s okay prove that some weird let's say any prime number let's say 101 to the power 4 plus 4 is not a prime number okay like that so how to prove something is not a prime number just factorize it okay so answer was none of them how to prove something to be a prime factorize it prove that there are factors okay you can write rmo from eight onwards okay so here's the final leaderboard okay so jagrav finally again good jagrav is back with his potent potential weapon okay uh never mind okay okay okay so good nishant great shivam kaveri and abhishek abhishek or what then srijan roshan and harsh harsh harsh is there and rishabh and vihan great good work guys okay good very good so did you learn something something or not sir next time give easy questions next time what easy questions why why do you want easy questions only only then can you become a person like you become much better than me oh wrong wrong examples and benchmarks oh this is exhausted by eight o'clock sir what will get into our mind ah that's all that's good i i i can i can take that point yes i don't want to do folks i want to do it early but i have no choice so please keep learning the 12 questions which we call today weren't a little different and i my intention is to keep you exposing to different you know keep you you know uh let's say exposed to different different types of questions so that's what the intent is i hope it is helping you all thanks guys and thanks for attending the session so let's meet again tomorrow in the class with hsr folks bye bye take care and stay safe bye do some exercise thank you sir bye bye bye bye thank you do some exercise make it in back three things bye bye take care thank you thank you thank you bye bye bye momisha take your learning learning please remember the learning guys how many people i think around 70 odd so please keep learning keep learning learning is the key whether you win or not secondary learn learn learn learn learn learen learn thank you sir bye sir bye bye take care thank you for that by who's this sony sir we roshan oh roshan oh roshan thanks roshan thank you bye bye bye bye take care