Save 10% with my code BOBBY10 on raw, organic, grass-fed and grass-finished, freeze-dried organ meats from grassland nutrition. Link in the description box. All right guys, welcome back to the channel. If you're new Manms Bobby guys, YouTube beef, today we're gonna react to Kyle with his video Bobby's Perspective Exposed. If you're new to this channel back in the day, I used to do anti-vegan content and if you do anti-vegan content, the vegans get very triggered of course, they're very emotional people and therefore there were plenty of vegan youtubers that would do hate videos about me and I have to say I missed it because in the past few months I've been doing predominantly Islamic reaction videos so therefore I'm very curious to hear what Kyle has to say about me. With no further ado, let's have a look. All righty guys, today I want to talk about Bobby's Perspective. This is the perfect example of what not to do if you have a question. Instead of going to his priest or looking up online, quiz questions about the trinity and orthodox Christianity. But that's what I did. Moreover, I went to Mount Athos and talked to the priest and monks over there about the trinity. I talked about the trinity in my church and obviously, duh, I looked it up online. Yes, I have access to the internet as well, Kyle. Moreover, I looked for the trinity within the Bible especially and of course, I could not find it. Thanks for the advice. He's instead makes a video called I am a heretic. I reject the trinity, but I'm still an orthodox Christian. Three things I can- So again, Kyle makes it look here as if I haven't done all of those things prior to making the video as if I just woke up one day, hmm, I can't accept the trinity and then the next day I did a YouTube video. Of course not. I did extensive research, actually two years straight before I even thought about making such a video. Three things I can't accept in orthodox Christianity. He can't accept veneration. He can't accept communion. It's not worship. It's a body and blood of Christ. But then he still says, well, I'm still an orthodox Christian. I actually don't claim to be an orthodox Christian any longer. However, I emphasize that I come from an orthodox Christian background. I believe that you converted to Christian orthodoxy pretty recently. So therefore, I understand, of course, your vigor and your excitement. Nevertheless, I was born into orthodoxy. I was baptized at birth and coming from the Balkans to be precise, Northern Macedonia, comparing my worldview to the other so-called orthodox Christians within my family, within my surroundings. I can tell you that I'm more Christian than they are, even though by name, of course, they will say that they are orthodox Christians without even knowing about the Trinity, without even knowing about the Theotokos or whichever fancy word you might want to use. All I pointed out is that culturally, I'm an orthodox Christian and nowadays, if you look at orthodox Christians, you will see that they have very little knowledge about their own doctrine. That's it. Okay, this is exactly what not to do. You have called yourself a heretic. A heretic goes out and they teach others the error. Kyle, I know it is hard to wrap your head around it, but there is such a thing in this day and age which we call sarcasm. Try it sometimes. Sprinkle a little bit of humor on top if you will. I'm obviously not Arius that spreads the doctrine of Arianism. No, Kyle, yet again to clarify it for you, I'm not a heretic literally. I guess I have to give sarcasm disclaimers from now on.  You should go to someone that you trust and try and get your questions answered instead of teaching it to thousands of people. That is irresponsible and that's dangerous for your soul. But what am I teaching really? You do realize that I'm simply reacting to Islamic videos, learning myself about it, learning myself about an already established religion. I'm not teaching Islam, nor am I teaching Christianity or a different version of Christianity. If you look at the history of his channel, he used to do anti-vegan content. He started doing some videos about Christian reacts to Islam and those videos got really popular. So for the past six months, his entire channel is just praising Islam. If you go even further back in time, you will see that I always did what I was into at the time. So there was a time when I was promoting raw veganism on my channel. There was a time about fasting. There was a time about bodybuilding. There was a time about spirituality, etc, etc. So ultimately, welcome to the channel. Welcome to Bobby's perspective. This is what this channel is about. Yes, me, Bobby here being interested in a subject and talking about it. So to call yourself a heretic and then to make all your videos praising Islam, a false religion is dangerous and irresponsible, dangerous and irresponsible. Can you offer any proof why Islam is false? Moreover, you said I should have talked to my priest. How about the Russian priest Vladimir Ugruyumov, that was a priest for over 15 years and then converted to Islam? The thing based off his comments and content, he would have just become a Muslim already.  I'm just searching for truth. So first and foremost, a little history lesson for Kyle here. You don't have to be a Trinitarian in order to be a Christian. There were Christians that were Unitarian, Gnostic Christians were partially Unitarians as well. But moreover, why I still see myself as a Christian and not as a Muslim is actually very simple, because I haven't converted. During my lifetime, Kyle, and I think I'm a little bit older than you, I went through many phases, many stages. I explored Buddhism, I explored Hinduism, I went to the Amazon jungle and I explored Shamanism, many different spiritual practices, many different ideologies, but nevertheless, during that time, I never converted to Buddhism or Hinduism and I always saw myself as a Christian, even though I wasn't practicing. This is the simple reason why I still am a Christian. The entire channel is just dedicated towards Islam. And Islam is not the truth. You can watch Orthodoxyata, Sam Shimon, I have lots of videos on Islam. It's a false religion that was started in the 600. It has no continuity with the prior teaching yet. But yet instead Christianity of course has continuity based upon what exactly, if you see the New Testament and the Old Testament, they stand in stark contradiction to each other. Moreover, if you look into Judaism, which of Christianity is the continued form allegedly, you will of course see that they are yet again in absolute contrast to each other. Judaism is about monotheism, about one God, the God of Israel. You can think about that, what you will. And Christianity is about Jesus being God. How is that continuous of the old doctrine? Ted, he's just milking this niche. I'm just searching for truth, guys, just gaslighting Islam, which is highly irresponsible. Now I want to respond to his first video. I'm a heretic. Kyle, we're going to give you the benefit of the doubt because whilst recording this video, you of course couldn't have known it, but I already said it three times here in my video. It becomes very, very cringy, man. You didn't get the joke. I have to speak my mind. I cannot believe it. No matter what I do, I cannot build because I wanted to free myself from manmade structures. I wanted to free myself from external belief systems and free myself from religious dogmas. Iroska, Shamanism, Buddhism, Hinduism, so you know, grandiose, absolutely mesmerizing. However, and now comes the turning point of the story, I hadn't heard about the trinity. So he starts a video by giving off his background. He dove into every dude. My father is 65 years old and he never heard about the trinity. He's firm in his conviction that he's an Orthodox Christian. But it seems like he's just trying to make up his own religion. He likes a little bit of that, a little bit of this. No, I actually don't not at all because this is what I learned within the New Age movement. People started picking and choosing whatever they liked, they're gonna pick from Buddhism, Hinduism, etc, etc. When I returned to Orthodoxy, I wanted to accept it as a whole. And this is why I dug deep into the doctrine, did the pilgrimage to Mount Athos, etc, etc. And this is when I found out about the trinity for the very first time. At first, I was absolutely shocked. How could anybody believe this about God? However, because it was such an intrinsic part of the faith, I had to accept it because I didn't want to cherry pick. I want to accept Orthodoxy this time 100%. And for two years straight, I tried to convince myself of the trinity. I researched, I looked, I talked to church fathers to monks, etc, etc. You name it. But in the end, I ended up with the same conclusion. It is absolutely irrational, illogical, and I personally cannot believe it. That's it. The aesthetics and chance, which is great. But he says, oh, no, no, but the trinity, that doesn't make any sense. I can't understand. No, to this very day, I appreciate the chance. However, when they are chanting about Jesus being God, or that Mother Mary is the mother of God, I simply cannot resonate with it. Nevertheless, aesthetically, yes, it's beautiful. You know what? Buddhism aesthetically is beautiful as well. But I personally do not prescribe to it. I couldn't find an explanation by myself, and I couldn't find an explanation within the faith. Really? You couldn't find a single good explanation? You could have got your local priest and said, hey, can you explain the trinity? Yes, but that's what I did. And ultimately, they told me it's a mystery. So how is that a good explanation? I'm kind of confused on it. You could have done a Google search, a YouTube search. There are literally so many YouTube videos going into extreme death of explaining the trinity. Yes, and none of them make sense. Good way to understand it is we believe in one God. But one what? One essence. Three persons. Another way to understand this is the son. Think of the son as the father. Think of the son. Think of an egg. Right? An egg has three parts as well. It has the shell. It has the egg white. It has the egg yolk. But all of it is one egg. As Christ and the heat as the Holy Spirit. They are all one in the same, but there are real distinctions. There aren't three separate sons. Again, this is just an analogy, trying, using a created thing to try and explain the uncreated. But since you're considering, did you explain it? Islam gets out of this. They say, God is simple. God is Tahi. God is one. One what? One essence. How does Allah actually interact with the world? And how do you have knowledge of Allah? And since they claim that Moses, Solomon, Abraham were actually Muslims. Well, and how did the Lord appear to Moses, appear to Solomon, appear to Abraham? It makes no sense and it requires a trinity. Yeah, he didn't really see him right in those stories. We know that the mountain shatters that God cannot even be perceived. So God appears in the form of angels. For example, it is the same within Islam. God transmutes his message through the Angel Gabriel. So what are you talking about? Because ultimately it was proposed to me as one of the greatest mysteries. But that wasn't and that isn't enough for me. Truth. The essence of truth is always simple. It cannot be complicated and it cannot be so complicated that the layman cannot understand it. I gave a really easy example that every lay person can understand and every lay person isn't going to be judged on their theological knowledge. But what is wrong of you to do is to make a video that will reach thousands of people claiming that I am a heretic and I reject the trinity still reasons while also claiming to be an orthodox Christian. You should not do that as a layman. If you don't know, Kyle yet again, I clearly distance myself from being an orthodox Christian. I said that I come from an orthodox Christian background. Again, welcome to the channel. Kyle, this is Bobby's perspective. We talk about my story. We talk about my perspective, how I got born as an orthodox Christian, how I went through the New Age, different spiritual practices. And right now we're exploring Islam. Hello, ultimate. I did. I did. Thank you. Thank you for the tip. He has lots of these videos. Oh, I'm a Christian, but I reject all the important Christian doctrines. And this next one is three reasons he can't accept orthodox Christianity. Thank you, everybody that reached out after my last video. It was absolutely beautiful to see. We had many ages, we had new ages, we had Jews, even Masonic Jews, if I remember correctly. And moreover, we had many Muslims, of course, in the comment section. It was absolutely beautiful. You reject the trinity and then you get praised by Jews, Muslims, New Ages, and Freemasons. And you say that's a beautiful thing. Freemasons. Really? To see a very interesting exchange of ideas. Of course, we had many haters as well. You're not a Christian. I still identify as a Christian. However, I do have... And mind you, this was a video recorded before I ever started doing Islamic reaction videos. However, I do have issues with certain... He's doing exactly what these progressive Christians do. Yes, I'm a Christian, but I just reject all of church teaching and I follow myself. And he openly identifies as a heretic. Maybe that's a sign that you should do some more research and talk with your priests and not reach thousands of people with your heresy. That is dangerous for you. It's dangerous for other people. And why do you do this? Certain practices in the church and with certain practices that people do practice to this very day. Christianity is the all-or-nothing system. You don't get to pick and choose, oh, I like that. I like the aesthetic. Which Christianity are we talking about? Protestantism, Catholicism, Orthodoxy, the Jehovah's Witness. So as you can see within Christianity, yes, it is still very much pick and choose only if you choose one branch of it. And I agree. Of course, within that branch, there is no picking and choosing. We already talked about that. Reject the Trinity. No, you have to submit to what the church teaches. And when you know what the church teaches, and I personally do not submit to it. Reject it. You put yourself outside the church. Exactly right. Yes, I am outside of the church. I do not visit the church any longer. With these, you know, leftist, progressive Christians.  Yeah, I know what the church teaches, but I'm going to follow myself. Don't do that. The first and foremost, kissing icons. Yeah. I already know about kissing icons because I grew up in an Orthodox household and it never made any sense to me. And it still does. And it rations. Kissing the icons, but it simply felt wrong. That's all I can say. It felt completely wrong. If you're not worshiping the icons, we are venerating the icons. But guys, if you kiss those icons, that is worship in my book. Yes, there is a huge difference between veneration and worship. And just because you think it's worship, okay, it's not worship. It's veneration. Yeah, there's a huge difference between veneration and worship because there is really a huge difference between veneration and worship. What is the difference, Kyle? There is, of course, no answer. It is simply another word that is being used here. You take this icon, you put it into church for over 40 days. In that church, it will be blessed with holy water and with incense. And then you take that thing into your household and you attribute certain powers to it. You believe that it has certain powers.  It's not worship. Kissing icons, why? We kiss other people. Lots of different other cultures do that. So how can it be inherently wrong to kiss an icon? And when we're venerating an icon? Yeah, right?  Exactly the same. Towards a piece of wood. It's towards the person in that piece of wood. When we venerate the icon of the Theotokos, it's all towards Mary. What is wrong with venerating icon? It is not worship. This is exactly what is wrong with it. You claim not to worship, but at the same time you call Mother Mary Theotokos, which means the mother of God.  That doesn't make any sense whatsoever in your logic. If you're worshiping God, of course, you have to worship his mother. Absolutely nonsensical. This is what is wrong with that. Moreover, of course, as you said yourself, it's not about the piece of wood, but it's about the person within that wood. That is exactly the issue here because you're attributing certain powers to those people in those depictions. Don't you understand that you are using intermediaries to God, even from the Christian doctrine out on? We are not in paradise.  We are in a slumber. That is correct. Look it up yourself. You will see that we are in a slumber in the grave, so to speak. And if that is the case, then there are no saints whatsoever. All of those people are simply dead, but you do not want to accept that they are dead and therefore you attribute powers to them. You use them to communicate through them to God. Thank God for Islam because through Islam, I learned this is called ship. The entire seventh ecumenical council is about this, about how veneration and worship are two totally different things. Worship is to God alone. And since you're considering Islam, you should look up. Exactly. Worship is to God alone, but do you truly worship God alone? Of course, you do not, man. How often do I have to repeat this? You have Jesus, you have Mother Mary, the mother of God. You venerate everything besides God. Muslims at Mecca kissing the Kaaba, venerating the Kaaba. Everyone wants to put their hand on the Kaaba circling around the Kaaba. You're comparing apples to oranges. First and foremost, it is not mandatory to kiss the Kaaba. Not at all. It is not part of the faith. However, it is part of the faith within orthodoxy to kiss icons and to kiss the hand of the priest. Moreover, yet again, apples and oranges, because Mecca is a pilgrimage in some instances, a once in a lifetime pilgrimage. You, however, kiss those icons every Sunday, man. Veneration, according to you, that's worship. Again, there's a huge difference between veneration and worship, but acting like, oh, I can't accept it. Listen, Kyle, I don't have a double standard here. Kissing the Kaaba, for me personally, yes, it's worship too. I personally wouldn't do it. And yet again, it is not part of the religion. Nowhere does it say you have to kiss the Kaaba. Not at all. However, in the church, kissing the icons is part of the mystery. That in orthodox Christianity, that's pagan. Veneration is not. When you become a Muslim, they have the same exact thing. But again, there's a huge difference between veneration and worship. And what is the difference? Tell us. And yet again, why is veneration good to begin with? And moreover, no, Muslims do not have the exact same thing. Muslims do not go every Sunday to the Kaaba and kiss the Kaaba. The other thing was kissing the hand of the priest. Yeah, dude. That felt so cultish, so guru-like to me seeing the cults. Why would I worship yet again another man? Kissing the bishop's hand is not worship. In lots of different cultures, you kiss people on the cheek. It's just a sign of respect. It's not worship. Yeah, but who cares what you do in culture? Yes, the French people kiss each other on the cheek, males and females. In other cultures, you don't even shake the hand. Why would I take those examples and infuse them into religion? Culture has nothing to do with religion. You're considering Islam. Islam permits that you can kiss people on the hands. It's not worship, even in Islam. So for me personally, the turban gave it away. Just a quick google search will show you that Hafiz Sharif Ali is not a simple Sunni scholar, not your everyday Muslim, but he seems to be part of the Sufi branch of Islam. So no, Kyle, you can't just pick a random bearded guy and claim this is Islam. I can pick a random Christian and claim this is Christianity. We are in the first range of a major flood. It has already begun. Amen. Now, I said that by the Holy Ghost. Now, I'm going to say this, this is me talking, but it's, well, I'm still speaking of the Spirit, but on a different level. That doesn't work that way. Kissing the hand is an act of reverence. It's a act of you being in all. Does it? Is this Islam? And the last one is eating from the same spoon as 20 other guys and saying that the spoon is the flesh of Christ. Very strange. The wine is the blood of Christ. Yeah. This is another key teaching in Christianity in scripture. Christ says, this is my body and blood. Those who do not eat and drink of this. Yeah. Thanks for helping us out here. It's not that Christ said this. At least we really do not know. However, we do know that John said this. Do not have eternal life. We can read all the church fathers. They affirm the real presence. And yes, it is under the eyes of bread and wine, but it is spiritual nourishment that we all need. And all these and fun fact here, back in the day when I was into the keto diet, carnivore diet, primal diet, I met a bunch of Americans that converted to orthodoxy. Even though they were promoting Christian orthodoxy on YouTube, none of them fasted. Why is that so? Because the orthodox fast is plant based, pretty much vegan. However, they were used to eating a lot of meat and then they would wrestle with their faith and tell themselves, oh, why does God want this from me? How can I abstain from this healthy nourishing food? So they would intuitively understand that bread and alcohol are among the worst substances that you can put into your body. Those guys intuitively understood it. Everybody knows, man, bread is absolutely horrible for you. And so is alcohol. But now somehow, magically, we're going to say it's healthy and more over spiritual nourishment. Not even the orthodox converts adhere to this doctrine. We're born doctrines that he rejects like the Trinity. We affirm it. Not only me. Every service. We say it in the creed that you have. I know you do. And even before we're seeing communion, we have the pre communion prayer that I believe a Lord that I confess, et cetera, et cetera. We confess that this is a true body and blood of Christ. I did a spiritual nourishment. Yes, I'm very well aware. And this is something that I personally cannot believe. It sounds not only cultish, but satanic to me. So you may find that hard to believe. You may not like it. But again, you could have asked your priest. You could have Googled online. I have no Internet. Kyle, two videos on no access, bro. You could have read the church fathers and elders. But instead, you make a video reaching 1000 people, which is irresponsible. So how can it be the flesh of Christ? I had to make myself believe that again. Ultimately, I didn't believe it. How did Christ turn water into wine? How did the universe come to be in the first place? Why is there a universe at all? There's all of these mystery that maybe we can't fully understand because we have a finite human mind. But through prayer. Okay, so you have a finite human mind. You cannot understand those mysteries, but somehow you believe that you understand that the only way for God to communicate with his creation is through a trinity. You cannot accept that he could potentially communicate with his creation through his unity. That is a mystery that you won't accept, but all the other mysteries. Yes, please. Passing repentance through reading the church fathers and elders, you can come to understanding of these controversial topic during mushroom experiences as well. I know that many religious folks don't want to hear it, and I haven't touched mushrooms over two years. But I cannot discard nice experiences. Now it's even longer, almost three years. During those mushroom experiences, I had many encounters with God. And even after that, in a sober state, I had encounters with God again. And God was always the perfect unity. Actually, the only perfect unity there is. There is nothing like him. Absolutely nothing. I can say with confidence that I encountered God. His basis for rejecting Christianity in the trinity is because oh, he did mushrooms and he felt God's unity. See how he picks and chooses here. Yes, I mentioned spiritual experiences, but in the same breath, I mentioned in a sober state as well. Even if you think about it rationally, you will come to the same conclusion. We need a point of origin for this universe. If we track the causal chains back, cause and effect, cause and effect, cause and effect, we're going to end up at the first cause. The first cause has to be uncreated. And even Christians will agree with that.  However, you already have a mental construct put in place here, Jesus. And therefore you already know that this is something created. Jesus cannot be this first cause because it is already a mental construct. You can already imagine Jesus and therefore it cannot be God. Even within your own Bible, you will find that there is nothing like God and that God certainly is not a man. Since the real God, the Trinity, isn't like that. Well, he rejects that. Well, if you look into Orthodoxy, read Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future, you're very skeptical of everything. You don't go searching for an experience, especially in psychedelics. That's how you get a demonic experience. But he's saying, no, I know God. Okay, how do you know that's God? When all of the Orthodox elders, even the Bible says be still and know God. That is Prila. Debted beliefs from other men. And because you're not convinced. Exactly. He's simply just proving my point. You read the Church Fathers and now you believe this is your opinion. It's not your opinion, Kyle. It's the Church Fathers. That's it. And those convictions, you want to force them upon me. You don't even know me for you're just digital on screen. But you want me, that digital character, to believe what you think you believe. This just shows how weak you are. It's my weakness for calling out your error. For you not being able to understand this, I'm the weak person for trying to correct you because you're reaching thousands of people. And let's say you do become Muslim. But yet again, Kyle, I'm not claiming to be Orthodox, nor am I teaching a different version of Orthodoxy. Hence yet again, the hereticism is a cheeky joke for the 1037th time, Kyle. All I'm doing here on this channel is sharing what I do. This is literally it. So yes, I was an Orthodox Christian from birth out on, stopped practicing within my 20s, returned to it in my 30s and found it to be flawed. This is it. I am not claiming Orthodoxy. I am not here to change Orthodoxy, nor do I think of myself so highly that I believe I would be even able to change Orthodoxy. Orthodoxy has been established with the creeds. That's that. If you want to follow it, have fun. You teach error as a Muslim. Other Muslims are going to call you out. Are you going to call them? Exactly. No, I wouldn't. Because if I would claim this is Islam, they should call me out. If I would claim that this here is Orthodoxy, you should call me out. I am not claiming Orthodoxy. Now Christians have a duty to correct people who are in error. You have openly said you are a heretic and I want to help you and you need to realize that your teaching is dangerous and wrong. In the end of the video, by mixing a clip of Orthodox aesthetics with psychedelics, which you should not do, but it's reflective of what he does. Who said that exactly? Moreover, this is footage that I filmed myself on Mount Artaus. So this is simply what I filmed myself and found aesthetically pleasing. Is this a sin, Kyle? He picks and chooses. Oh, I like these Orthodox aesthetics and chants. Mixing that with I felt God in the mushrooms and the psychedelics and now it's Islam and just pursuing truth. But what he ends up doing is just making his own religion, just following him. Kyle appreciating aesthetics does not mean someone makes up their own religion. I do appreciate the aesthetics of Lamborghinis. Does that mean Lamborghinis are my God? I do appreciate the aesthetics of Buddhist temples, even though I would never subscribe to Buddhism. Even Hindu temples are nice to look at sometimes. But I do not subscribe to Hinduism. It is simply aesthetically pleasing to me. And even if you take those Orthodox chants and you play it to Muslims, guess what? They find them beautiful as well. All that being said, you absolutely mischaracterized me here, because I am absolutely opposed to picking and choosing. I come from a spiritual background and within the New Age, I saw what happened when people started picking and choosing. A little bit of Buddhism, a little bit of Hinduism, a little bit of meditation, a little bit of channeling, etc, etc, etc. and then they made it into a new religion. This is what I personally detest and this is why I returned to Orthodoxy and I wanted to commit 120%. I did it all. As I said, the pilgrimage, I attended the church service, the daily prayers, the fasting as well. And then in the end came to the realization that there are so many man-made components that I cannot live with. I saw so much idolatry within that doctrine that I cannot accept it. And this is why I am out of it, Kyle. Yet again, I'm not picking and choosing here. Quite the opposite. This is why I got interested in Islam and this is why I am learning about Islam. I'm not taking bits and pieces of Islam and I'm going to intermix it. Maybe I'm going to take some LSD and then go to the mosque. Of course not. Right now, I'm 100% focused on Islam. Where does he reveal himself? Even Jesus never talked about the Trinity. Wouldn't you think if it is such an important part of the doctrine, Jesus would have mentioned it? Versus the actual God, the revealed God in submitting to the church. Submitting to the church, exactly right. Not submitting to God, like it is done in Islam, but submitting to the church. He answered. There are so many good YouTube videos that explain all of the critiques about the Trinity, about what he doesn't understand, about orthodoxy. And a lot of these things, it's not like you become a Muslim and these issues don't go away with veneration as if Tahit is so much more simpler than the Trinity. These don't get solved. Yeah, but it's actually way easier. Tahit, one God or the Trinity, three Gods in one. You can make a part two and a part three on Bobby because he's made so many bad videos and if he's watching this, you need to realize that what you're doing is very dangerous for your soul and the souls of others. Please pray for him. Thank you, Carl. I hope you enjoyed the video. God bless. God bless you. All right, guys, and this is it for today's video. I have to say I really like Kyle and I wish him well. Seeing him, I don't see a bad person. I simply see a young kid that is extremely pious and strict about his newfound belief. It is understandable. As I said, I met many Americans that converted to orthodoxy and therefore became very zealous about it at first. They thought that this is the truth. I can relate because I thought it's the absolute truth. However, researching further, I of course saw the flawed aspects of it. For example, alcohol in itself. When I visited Mount Athos, many priests were actually drunk. Even at the baptism of my son back in the day, the priest was drunk. This is when I realized that the devil has infiltrated the church because it is a slippery slope. Why would you allow alcohol in the religion of God? We all know that it is a slippery slope for people and I met them. I saw them firsthand. As I said, priests and monks absolutely drunk. Anyways, the video is long enough as it is. I'm going to cut it off here. Yet again, Kyle, no hard feelings whatsoever. Quite the opposite. You're invited on this channel if you'd like. We can discuss your path to orthodoxy, my path to orthodoxy and out of it, Islam, et cetera, et cetera. You're absolutely invited to come on the show. All right, guys, but this is it for today's video. If you liked it, leave it a thumbs up. If you haven't subscribed already, guys, please do so. And if you want to support this channel via Patreon, all the links are in the description box below. Thank you so much for your ongoing support, guys. As always, may God bless you all. Much love and peace.


Hi there! It's DJB, and in this video I'm going to teach you a couple different methods on how to add Roaning to your model horse custom. Roaning is a super awesome technique that allows you to create really dynamic pieces that involve realistic hair texturing and aging. First things first, you want to make sure you understand the hair growth pattern of the horse. Horses have a very unique pattern in which their hairs grow. I highly recommend using the Atlas of Animal Anatomy, and this is a book that you can get on Amazon which will be linked in the description below.  The method number one is using pencils. So I'm using a Faber-Castell pencil crayon, but you can also use watercolor crayons, prismacolor pencil crayons, or even a white charcoal. You have to experiment and always keeping a pencil sharpener on hand. You're gonna want to start with a model that has a good base coat on it. This particular horse is a blue ron, so I painted him in a kind of a gray color, and then we're going to add white hair and details over top. Using the larger hole of your pencil sharpener, you're able to create a more defined point if you use that hole. I like using the Faber-Castell pencil crayon because it's not super waxy, so it creates kind of a fine line, and it was a little bit firmer so it doesn't break so much. And then you're just gonna want to draw on your little hairs in the pattern of the hair growth very slowly. So this is a very time-consuming process.    It's not gonna do well at shows. They have to be in proportion to the actual size of the model. Now it's not always necessarily about making individual hairs as much as making clusters of hairs, so you want to overlap your lines a little bit so that some of them are a little darker in sections and there's not hair in some sections. When it comes to the flank area you have to be quite careful about making sure that the direction of the hair growth is accurate.  I like to do it in chunks and I like to take lots of breaks. Now you can use your finger to kind of brush off some of the little pencil residue chunks that show up and also blend out the work that you're doing and make sure not to handle the model too much because this stuff will rub off. You can seal the model in phases too if you feel like you're gonna be touching it too much. If you screw up at any point you can use a kneaded eraser to lift some of that pencil and remove it from the model. This works pretty well. The stuff comes off pretty easily and for areas such as the legs you want to fan out the hairs so that they get significantly smaller almost like little dots because as we blend into the leg of the horse the roaning actually goes away so that the legs are completely black. The body is the only part that is containing your roaning so just adding really small little pieces at the tops of the stockings really can make a realistic difference in your custom work. It was a very subtle way of roaning that's not too complicated and pretty easy to do just time-consuming. Method number two is hair by hair. Now for this I use a Windsor and Newton triple zero paint brush especially for stable mates. You can use up to the size zero for traditionals and I find that golden high-flow titanium white works the best and you're just gonna do the same thing you did with the pencil but you're using paint. The golden high-flow works really well because you don't need to dilute it. It goes on fairly white but when it dries it very translucent weight so the base coat of your model will really show through. This is super delicate and you have to be really careful not to glob up your paint so you want to dab out a lot of the paint before you even go but these Windsor and Newton paint brushes make it really easy because they absorb the paint to the top of the brush and then you're using a supply of that paint in the tip. You really don't need to fill your brush with paint very often. You can get several strokes out of this paint brush before you need to dip it back in the paint so this combination works really really well but it's also very time-consuming and you can't rush or your hairs are gonna look too long in places and too little in others and the same thing you kind of want to build it up in clumps versus individual hairs. I have another example here using a Windsor and Newton paint which didn't work as well and this paint brush was kind of fighting me but this is a good example because you can get away with using a cheaper paint brush or different brands of paint. It is personal preference and I just find that the golden works the easiest. I struggled with this model a little bit as the brush was bending and warping and the hairs weren't coming out as much as hairs as I would like them to. It was more of a stippling action on this particular custom. Method number three is using a fan brush. I picked up this little fan brush at Michaels. It's just a regular I don't know artist Princeton brush and I'm able to create really awesome hair texture pretty easily. So you want to water down your paint pretty good and kind of smudge it into the brush and you're gonna use a lot of layers for this method so I'm using a layers of black and white to create the running with this model.  Working on this Otheo custom that was really beneficial because this model would take way too long doing individual hairs and I'm just gonna go back and forth from white to black until I get kind of the feeling that there's roaning going on so it's not just white hairs on top of the body but all the hairs are intermix. The paint I used for this is Golden High Flow as well just a combination of the black and titanium white so you can experiment with what you feel but it's the easiest paint to work with this brush because it doesn't need the dilution like I said before and I think that this look turned out really awesome and the finished models I've been able to get with this fan brush have been really exciting so this is a unique technique that you can play around with. Just don't be afraid to tackle a Rhone. It's a really satisfying process when you can nail it. Thank you so much for watching and happy roaning. Please subscribe for weekly Wednesday uploads follow me on Instagram and Facebook at DJB Studios. Check out my website and sign up to my newsletter to be the first to know about commissions, tutorials, and sales pieces. All of the tools used in this video are in the description below. If you have any questions feel free to message me.


And the guy at the counter recognized me and said, are you listening? Yes, I'm tweeting away. I tweet, I'm tweeting away. He is kind of rude that way. F***ing keyboard. John Cleese joins the CUBE alumni. Welcome, John. You got any phone calls you need to answer? Hold on, let me check. From Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE, covering RSA Conference 2017. Now, here's your host. John Furrier. I've been in the studio back from the floor at RSA. I'm John Furrier, watching theCUBE. And we are here with Akash, who's Oracle Security. Welcome to theCUBE. Yeah, thanks. It's great to be here, John. So you're running security practice within Oracle. What's your job at Oracle? Yeah, absolutely. So my role is really around helping to secure our cloud. And we believe that's a key and very important aspect for security going forward is protecting and securing the cloud. And then also a number of security products and services and solutions that help organizations deal with today's changing landscape, security landscape, and help their SOC deal with those threats. So a lot of solutions that we have both on-premise as well as a lot of new security cloud services. So Akash, tell us about the landscape on the threat side. Because what's different at RSA this year to me is, at least from our observations we up there for the past two days, we'll be up there tonight in some of the VIP parties to get the scuttle by most of the industry. But the industry seems to be evolving very quickly around a call to arms, if you will. There seems to be a call to arms around the cyber threats. It has almost a military feel to it this year. Obviously you have a lot of government officials up there. This isn't like the hackers anymore uniting to fight the bad guys. This is a complete industry call to arms. Do you see it that way? And what's your reaction to this year's RSA? What's bubbling up to you as the top trending topics and themes? A great question, John. So I think one thing that I've seen a trend over the last few years is that just in terms of the type of people that come to RSA, security has become a very relevant and pervasive topic across business leaders, across government leaders around the world. And so it's no longer just an IT problem or conversation. It's a CEO conversation, it's a board conversation, it's a presidential conversation. So one is you just see the type of people that are there. The other thing that I definitely, there's definitely a couple of themes that have emerged at RSA for me. One of the themes is definitely around the more sophisticated types of attacks. And you see all these new technologies that have come out, you talk about cloud or you talk about artificial intelligence, mobile. And one of the first people adopting those are attackers and cyber criminals taking advantage of those and revolutionizing their techniques, tools and procedures around these new technologies. It just seems so easy to me to fix this problem. I mean, I have an answer in the answer is encryption, right? I mean, why not just encrypt everything and have some awesome endpoint verification biometrics. I mean, outside of the case when Tom Cruise takes his eyeballs out in a minority report. But I mean, at some point, there'll always be a fail on the human side, but like, can't we just solve this in encryption? I mean, this has been a big conversation. I mean, just encrypt everything. Yeah, and definitely, I think like, if you think about it, there's definitely encryption, it definitely plays a key role as part of the overall security posture.  And one of the things is with a lot of security to date, what's happened, John, is people haven't been able to even turn security on because it's been very cost prohibitive, very, you know, impacts your performance. So if I turn on security on your laptop, yeah. From a technical perspective, you know, cycles and compute, but also business performance, do people have the people to do it?  It's absolutely both. It's definitely both. And from a performance standpoint, like one of the things Overhead in terms of like resources. Yeah, yeah, because one of the things that's really interesting is we talk about technology side, but if you talk about the people side, one of the professions that is significantly under staff today is cybersecurity professionals. They did a survey recently and you'd be surprised, John, they're saying there's over a million job openings for cybersecurity professionals and 66% of those can't be filled, will not be filled because there's not enough talent to fill those jobs. So there's a huge gap in terms of, you know, to type of work. All right, so this is the thing that gets me excited because, you know, we have the tech truth as our kind of open source of news reporting. And we've been saying that, you know, women in tech and certainly the diversity side is being worked on. But on the other end of the spectrum, our new theme with our tech truth is cyber warfare, cyber talent. I mean, my young kids are gaming, they're on steam, they're on multiplayer game. This is the profile of our next potential candidates.  Because I think there's an appetite between the new generation of digital natives who are very fluent in coding and doing, whether they're throwing R at something on some of that data science or they're multi-faceted, multi-tool player, if you will. Yeah, it is great. It's great to see that a lot of the curriculum today is starting to incorporate cyber security as a theme. Everything from the policy side to the technology side, you know, across the board, so security. What would you recommend? So a couple of things I would say, like, and things that I found for myself to be really practical, one is just get involved. Like, find organizations that help, you know, join the local meetups. There's so many meetups. Like who? Like who would be a good one to join? So like in the Bay Area, for example, we have Bay Area cyber security meetups, right? A lot of organizations, like companies, also sponsor a lot of events, like even Oracle. We have every single one of our events. If you come to an Oracle event, whether it's a Cloud World, a Cloud Day, Oracle Code, there are security sessions there to learn about what's happening in security, what cyber security professionals are doing. So those are great ways to learn more. What's the big walk away for you this year at the show? What jumped out at you that may or may not have been expected? I think two things. One that I would say I was expecting is that, you know, security really is a reason to move to the Cloud now. And so the type of security- They wouldn't have said that before. Before it was don't go to the Cloud for security reasons. Now you're saying- You're going to get much better security in the Cloud now. And that is, you know, provided that, and here's the key takeaway, John, is that provided you go with the right Cloud vendor, you can absolutely get much better security. So you get all the agility, all the benefits of Cloud, but you also get more security. And there's a list of things. We actually, one of the panels I was on, we talked about, what are the best practices? How do you choose a good, you know, Cloud partner and especially around assessing the security capabilities? Okay, so on the other side of that coin, I want to ask you the question. What's the noise? What was the noise at the show? Every show has a lot of the, you know, noise layers, whether it's security washing, what was the thing that just was that fell flat this year in your mind? You know, there's a couple of things. I think like every year you will see there's a lot of new emerging technologies that are out there. And I think that some of them, you know, what's happening today is cybersecurity professionals are saying, look, we got millions of alerts. I don't need any more alerts. I just need to figure out, what are the most important alerts out of those millions? And how can I quickly, more quickly respond to those? So a lot of the technologies that I think are like, hey, let's get you a lot more alerts. That's something that's not resonating a lot more. Monitoring package. Yeah. Come on, just give me one more platform. So there's some sprawling solutions, you're saying. Yeah, definitely. And I think like one of the things though, you know, so there's definitely some sprawl, but there's definitely some solutions that are really around unifying what you have and bringing intelligence, automation, and identity at the center of them to help you solve today's challenges. And I think those type of solutions and best practices are really what security operations centers need today to deal with today's challenges. So here's the theme that we saw. I want to get your thoughts and commentary on this. Our reaction is the cyber threat alliance that we were out on the first day, Monday, Fortinet was involved, Intel, which is McAfee Intel, which you know, there's rumors about that spinning out, actually news.  All the chiefs of those businesses out there saying, we're going to share information. So data sharing seems to be a big thing. Is that real? Is that something that's actually going to happen? Are people sharing? Because it seems to be that in security, we noticed at Splunk's event this year that we covered. This is now a new ethos where the security organizations are pretty tightly know each other. I mean, it's a small community relatively speaking. Is it a small community? I mean, what's your thoughts on that? What's your commentary on this? You know, two things I would say. First of all, a lot of the vendors you mentioned, I've been on panels with them and presented at their booth at RSA just yesterday and the day before, I think that as an industry and for the betterment of security, absolutely intelligence and intelligence sharing is at the center of improving your security posture. So understanding who the attackers are, being able to correlate information around those attackers, how to respond, is at the center of helping security operation centers. And even if you think about it, even at the, you know, a lot of the things, even at the government level that have been, you know, been thought about, President Obama has been a big advocate during his tenure around democratizing security intelligence, sharing it in more effective ways. And I think that is kind of something that we need to do. You think that's a good formula? Do you think it's workable? There's both pros and cons to this, John. I think at one hand to solve a lot of, you know, like what I would call petty type of, you know, everyday type of malware. Court scan or whatever, the normal low-end stuff. Those types of intelligence sharing are very effective and they're very important. There's always going to be some types of threats that are, you know, very new and those techniques are not going to be sufficient for every type of attack. It's definitely a good best practice, but it's not sufficient by itself. Yeah, so you use rules and heuristics to look at all the common patterns you trap on those. But it's really the new ones that people got to be careful of and there's no pattern there. What you're saying, big data can't solve a pattern. It hasn't seen. Right, and one of the things, and the reason I say this in particular is because if you look at some of the most advanced attackers, they're so persistent, they're so well-funded, they will find a way in. And in fact, when you look at organizations that do instant response and do investigations, they're saying organizations are already breached, but they don't know whether attackers are still in data yet, right? They have backdoors, they have CNC communication at the vast majority of organizations. So that just shows that persistent attackers will find a way in. So you have to assume that they're in. That's kind of like the mindset. Okay, cool, so final question, going forward as RSA and got Black Hat coming around the corner as well. State of the industry, I mean, the level of attacks and threats have changed. We were talking before we came on camera about your time at McKinsey, where there was no CISOs roles were just kind of coming on board. Now everyone has a CISO. There's all kinds of new challenges around that. So you got challenges and opportunities. What's the current state of the landscape? Visa V, kind of where you were when you were at McKinsey. What's the evolution trajectory look like? So I think a couple of things. I think one is that your attackers will continue to get more sophisticated. And we've seen that. We've seen APTs have ran somewhere to just recently seeing attacks, like distributed denial of service using global internet of thing devices. I mean, like five years ago, a lot of those technologies didn't even exist. And now attackers are doing that. So attackers will continue to get more sophisticated and leverage latest technologies. On the other hand, and this is where I think the real opportunity is, security operation centers need to rev up their game and keep pace with the attackers. And some of the things that I think you're gonna see in the future, one is concepts around things like identity sock where users are the new perimeter. Your network perimeter is dissolving. IT admin can't say, hey, John and everybody will keep you safe. Just sit in the office behind our firewall. People are mobile. People are accessing application in the cloud. And now users are the new perimeter. You and I and every one of us are the new perimeter. The devices we use, the apps we use, we're the perimeter. So we need solutions like identity sock that are tied together all your solutions with intelligence, with automation because there's too many alerts. So we need intelligence. We need automation. We need identity at the center of it to help security operation centers keep pace with the attackers. All right, Akash Bagarava, who's on both Oracle security. Thanks for coming on and sharing this live conversation. RSA coverage continues with theCUBE here in Palo Alto. We'll be up in San Francisco later today. Jeff Frick and I were there for the past two days. Wall-to-wall coverage, we'll be right back after this short break. Hi everybody, Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are on the ground in Dearborn, Michigan at a huge Ford event. It's called hashtag Ford Trends. It's a two-day event where Ford is bringing in some kind of social media people from all over the world to really talk about disruption. It's all about disruption. Mobility sometimes talked about as autonomous vehicles, but really it's a two-day slate full of a lot of key executives from the Ford team. We got to go out and drive on the autonomous vehicles. But really, again, talking about disruption, changes in the way cars are powered with hybrids and electronics, changes in ownership patterns with ride sharing versus individual ownership. A lot...


Appalachian Wireless makes it easy and affordable to tech the halls, extended through Christmas Eve, get an iPhone 13, 128 gig for only a penny with trade-in, on a two-year contract on a mix-and-match or unlimited plan, plus no activation fee. We are you. We are Appalachian Wireless. The Appalachian Wireless Arena is hosting a New Year's Eve party with an 80s throwback theme. Partygoers can expect neon lights, big hair and live performances from the swag tones and DJ Matt Cook. Tickets are now available at the Appalachian Wireless Arena box office and Ticketmaster for individuals or groups. So 80s music, of course. They're going to have folks dressing in their best 80s attire. I'm pretty sure you'll see more than McFlyer dressed up. They'll be all kinds of different themes. So you can get tickets at the Community Trust Bank box office or Ticketmaster.com. $35 for a ticket, a table of 10 for $350, a table of 4 for $150. So different options there. It'll be Julie Goff in the swag tones and DJ Matt Cook. So we'll be having karaoke. So karaoke's starting it out. You'll have music. You'll have some fun. It'll just be a mix of everything 80s. So definitely get those tickets. Everyone is encouraged to dress up either as their favorite 80s movie or rock star. The party will start at 8 p.m. and will go until 1 a.m. If you can dress as your favorite movie character, dress as your favorite musician from the 80s, make it fun. It's all about. It's all about the 80s. Recommend, of course, getting a table. Have you have spots to set. Like I said, go over again, table of 10 for $350, table of 4 for $150. All about the 80s. Music, DJs. Also karaoke. Reporting from Mountain Top News, I'm Nick Colum.


In sports news now, Mohamed Salas co-twices Liverpool comfortably beat old rivals Manchester United 4-0 at the Anfield on Tuesday to move top of the Premier League for 24 hours at least. But Liverpool moved to 76 points from 32 games with title rivals Manchester City on 74 points from one game fewer with Pep Guardiola's side hosting Brighton and Hovalbian at the Etihad today. Now, Colombian Luis Diaz gave Liverpool a fifth-minute lead tapping in from close range after Sadio Mane set Mohamed Salah free down the right and the Egyptian delivered a pinpoint low cross for a simple finish. I'm pretty sure I will ask anyway about it. My moment of the game, even when it was very important and a great result was the seventh minute when our people showed pure class and the whole stadium together showed pure class in a moment where we obviously everybody knew since yesterday, since I heard first time about it. There are so many things that are much more important in life than football. Obviously we really feel for Cristiano and his family. So that was my moment of the game, but other football moments were obviously absolutely outstanding. Yes, most called to set up the first, Luis set up Sadio's and get the ball from Mohamed and all this kind of joke that came on that most second up all these kind of things that couldn't have been better to be honest. I don't think so to be honest. No, I don't think that they have mentally checked out. It's just a different level. They have better players than we have if you look at it in total. And this is what was reflected by the results today. So there will be a rebuild for sure, but right now that doesn't help us because we still have another five games to play. So there has to be a rebuild for me was clear even when I came in December and after the first three or four weeks for me that was obvious, but right now it doesn't help. And for us it's extremely embarrassing also as a coaching staff to have press conferences like the one we have right now, but we just have to admit they are better than us.


Okay, we're back here live at the Velocity Conference. This is SiliconAngle.com's theCUBE, our flagship program. We go out to the events, extract the signal from the noise. SiliconAngle and theCUBE, we're four years old. This is our fourth season doing theCUBE and we'd love to go to the events and talk to the alpha geeks. And we call them the tech athletes, the guys who are out there making everything work under the hood, making things faster. And of course, as we've been talking about on theCUBE for many, many years, you know, the web-scale companies, Google, Yahoo, they're all built to the web. Facebook, obviously a more recent company, really created the web-op scale and had to build their own stuff because there was nothing available. And that's really the key story around the history of the web. But having Google on is always impressive, but also having developers is great. SiliconAngle was built on the philosophy of computer science meets social science and that's our philosophy. And you know, when you get geeks and user experience kind of working together, that really is what changes the world in our opinion and that's really kind of what's happening here at Velocity Conference. And my next guest is Ilya Grigorek at Google, developer advocate for high performance. You're also an author with O'Reilly. You're up talking today. Welcome to theCUBE. Thank you. So my first question is, obviously Google is a poster child for build their own. It's like the NASA lab meets Stanford University academic.  You got Google Glass. You got a lot of R&D, a lot of cool smart people working on stuff, but you got a big business in Google. You know, in and of itself called Search and AdWords that pay the bills. So you guys have a little bit of experience in making things run faster because quite frankly, you know, the faster the pages load, the faster people get their results and the faster people click on links. So you're highly motivated to make it go faster. So I want to ask you, what's your take about Velocity Conference? You know, you're talking to the folks out here, a lot of hallway conversations. What is your take on today's world around speed and performance, user interface, backend design, cloud meets user experience? So I think you hit a spot on, right? So Google is very motivated to make the web succeed, right? We know that the faster the web is, the more people will use the web, the more they will use search, the more they will click on ads and all these other things, right? So it's kind of like a secondary effect. So our goal is to make the web fast. Of course, we care a lot about speed at Google and making our web services fast, but more broadly, as you mentioned, you know, at Google we've invested across the entire stack. And personally, that's one of the things I enjoy about working at Google, where we have teams that work on the lowest levels of the stack, like, you know, sometimes we design our own hardware, but we also contribute to making TCP fast and making browsers fast. We have Google Chrome and everything in between, web standards and all the rest, right? So you kind of get this full slice. And here at Velocity, we get to talk to all the other people that are working in the same space. And I think it's a fantastic event because we have, as you mentioned, there's many other companies that are making significant contributions.  What are the guys at Facebook doing to make their data centers fast? Or what are they doing to make Flickr fast at Yahoo and all the rest? The thing about the exciting, to me at least, someone who's been, you know, been with the web from the beginning, going back in the early 90s, I've seen the evolution, right?  They're promoting this industrial cloud or industrial web or industrial internet. Basically it's the internet of things, but there's no real name for it. But prior to the web was called, we called this the information super highway. I think that was the buzzword in when I was in business school. It was like, what does that mean? And finally the web just came around. Okay, great, the web's here and that became history. But in seeing the evolution, you're seeing for the first time the people called the consumerization, really it's the confluence of integrating design, right? It's almost a systems architecture around looking holistically at user experience and designing user experience, not in a vacuum or in a silo, and then looking at the benefits of what the cloud can offer. So you know, you're at Google, you guys built your own cloud, Facebook has done their own thing. So the hyper scale, web scale, small scale, these things can grow very elastically. So I want to get your take on things that you're watching right now because you study high performance scale and also you want to make the web faster and you got to take advantage of that technology and then also, but keeping in mind the most important thing, user experience. So I want to ask you, what are you looking at right now out in the landscape here? You got to have the 20 mile stair around the scale, what could be stack development around some tech or things, but what tech are you looking at right now saying, hey, I'm watching this, I'm building on this and I'm watching that? Right, so I think first and foremost, performance is a means to an end, right? Like we can optimize CCP and optimize all the kinds of things, but as you said, it's all about user experience, right? So it's making sure that we actually deliver products that satisfy the user, the customer, and it does so in a meaningful way. So mobile, I'll focus on mobile. Mobile is of course exploding everywhere. I think anybody talks about this event, you'll find that their mobile traffic is going through the roof. It's either it has already surpassed their desktop traffic or it will in some foreseeable future. So everybody's trying to figure out what does this mean for us, right? Because we've designed our architecture, designed our data centers and made a lot of assumptions about things like latency and performance and all the rest based on the desktop architecture and now we need to retool. And I think that's at this conference we're seeing a lot of these conversations. Like what does it mean to, or what does it take to build a webpage or an application that is responsive on a mobile phone, right? Turns out when we talk to the users, just because it's on a mobile phone they don't expect it to be any slower. In fact, they expect it to be faster because hey, I'm on the go, I want the answer quickly, I want it to happen right now, right? But turns out the kind of the physical layers don't necessarily correspond to that because sometimes it just takes longer to do things on mobile, like the radio and other things. So, lots and lots of conversations at this event, lots of talks about how do you optimize for all these things? You know, mobile conversation is interesting because in the web development world, agile became the norm and that was really about iteration. You know, the same kind of QA system, there's a debate around what agile means in terms of that doesn't mean just punch out bad code. You still got to use QA, you're doing QA faster but agile means you can push code and if it breaks you can iterate the web page and just resurface some new code. Mobile's a little bit different. It's almost like back to the old days of pre-packaged software. People, it's hard to get those apps back. Especially when you have multiple iterations. It's a bug in mobile, it's hard to get that back. So how do you do agile programming in mobile? And at the same time, how do you make it go faster because if you have a million downloads and all of a sudden eight months later, if you don't have auto updating, you know, I know there's stuff to evolve especially with Android, there's a lot more mobile updates but now there's a developer paradigm. Do I use certain stacks to do that? What's the mobile look like for a developer? So I think you focused on apps, right? But then there's the mobile web and the mobile web is where you see, you have all of the benefits of that instant updates, right? Because you can push an update. It's just a website at the end of the day, right? Which means you can push as many releases as you want. There was a great talk by the Google Consumer Service team earlier yesterday and they shared some of the stats and how they deployed their application. Turns out they deployed 30 times a day, right? At Google scale to all of their customers and they built a number of tools for mobile specifically for how do you, like, how do you even do that? As you mentioned, it's not just about pushing code, it's making sure that you actually push code and deliver value, right? So they've automated things like, I push this thing and I want to compare the difference in pixels on the screen such that, you know, I didn't introduce a bug into my application. So lots of interesting tools and investment there. It is possible, right? Well, server side, Node.js is shown away on JavaScript at least. People are using a lot more Node because they can focus on the server side and then manage the edge that way. Are there any technologies that you're looking at that can do more of that on the web ops? I mean, obviously, web ops is a focus area. So I think it's a collection of technologies, right? So Node.js is a great runtime for certain class of applications. A lot of our applications, even coming back to the Google Consumer Service team, they're actually using App Engine, right? Which gives you kind of this managed runtime, which gives you a lot of benefits.  You know, if you get a spike of visitors and all the rest. So there's a collection of services out there, AWS, Google Compute Engine, all of these services together provide the necessary infrastructure. So I want to talk about your book with O'Reilly because you're working with some O'Reilly on the book side on high performance web. But I also want to ask you before we talk about the book, you know, you're in the community here. One of the things I was pointing out on the intro is that the velocity conference is, you know what, you really can't put your finger on it. It's not like, oh, I'm a cloud show. Or I'm a, hey, I'm a front end web show. It's kind of the intersection of that.  What is velocity here? What is this all about here? And what megatrend is this driving? Well, that's a hard question. Because as you said, you know, there's a number of people here that are focusing on building apps and specifically kind of the front end performance. And there's a dev ops people who are concerned about, well, how do I make the back end scale with all the demands of the front end? And then you have an intersection in between, right? And the testing and the tooling and all the pieces that kind of put all of this together. So to me, velocities has literally many meanings, right? It's like, how do you increase the velocity of your teams? How do you make and release apps more quickly, deliver more value? How do you increase the speed of the pages? How do you increase the conversion ratios? Like one of the things that we're discovering here at this conference is that there are many, many talks. Virtually every talk that you attend, we'll talk about not just performance for performance sake. Like we're engineers, we love fast things, but performance because there's value, right? Like we can translate it back to dollars and cents for the business. So speed is a future. And to me, that's what velocity is about. And it's interesting. It's a lot of infrastructure as well. So it is, in a way, a cloud show, but not in a pure, pure way. So your book, real quick, because we got a break, but I want to get the plug in for the work you're doing with O'Reilly. Yeah, so I'm writing a book called High Performance Browser Networking. It's basically TCP and up. So how does TCP work? How many, or what kind of constraints does it place on how we design our applications, which are especially important on mobile? Another big section I have is how do the wireless networks work, right? One of the great things about kind of our layered architecture is that a packet is a packet, right? Like it doesn't matter if you send it over an ethernet wire or a Wi-Fi link or a mobile phone, but it turns out performance-wise, it has important implications. So understanding those, you can design your application in a smart way. And then kind of you work way up. So I look at HTTP. We actually have HTTP 2.0 that's coming soon. And what does that mean? How is it going to change? Like are we going to change all the angle brackets in our HTML to squiggly brackets? No, we're not going to do that, but there are many new possibilities for improving performance. So that's the subject of the book. It's kind of a bottom-up and hopefully helpful. Real quick sound, but I want you to also just quickly give a quick summary of what does the native browser environment mean? You've got the native browser, Firefox announced it's fluent, native browser support, your web sockets now taking on a whole other level of meaning. What does this all mean for people out there and developers? Well, I think it means you can build more ambitious applications. So previously we built pages. So we started with a document, which had like a piece of text. Then we embedded a couple of images in it. And today, if you look at an average page, an average page is actually over one meg in size. It's constructed out of 80 plus resources and we have JavaScript, we have CSS and all of these things. And with HTML5 and kind of this native support that you're describing, you can now do things that you couldn't have done before without plugins. You can have interactive applications. You can have HTML5 video, you can do audio, you can do WebGL. It's just, it's a crazy land out there. It's a setting opportunity. The modern infrastructure is upon us, the modern app development. This is Velocity. I'm John Furrier, Eli Grigorek here from Google, making the web fast. That's his job. That's what he's advocating. And this is Velocity. We'll be right back with our next guest here on theCUBE right after the short break.


Rwy'n gwybod, mae'r cyfnodd wedi'u'n cyfnodd ar gyfer gyda Glynyddiadau am gyfnodd. Mae'r cyfnodd yn Celes Park ar y canlwys. Patrick, mae'r cyfnodd yn oses o gyfnodd. A chydwch, mae'n hyn o'n bod yn gallu ddod i ddod i ddwyno. Yn oed, fi'n gwneud amdano. Yn ymrychiad cyflwylliant sy'n wneud, ond rwy'n gwneud yn fwy o bwysig fydd gan yn ei pethol. Rwy'n ei ddweud, gan yn digwydd, ond mae gen i gwaith cyflodau, ond rwy'n ni'n ddweud yn gweithidiaeth ers arall i gael y dyfu pan ddweudr hynny. Ond mae'n ziad yn mynd i gael'r fferm Cymri nad yw ddweud yn gweithiono'r Fbrydol yn ynchonlwch fod mae'n gwaith cyflodau am y maes yma yn arlawn ac i功od dadol. i'n rhoi'n gweithio'n bwysig mewn gwahanol, dwi'n credu'n clwer o'r gwasanaeth, i ddweud o'r gwahanol yma yn unrhyw beth o'r goll, ond bytio'n gwahanol i'r gwasanaeth i'r gwahanol i'r bwysig, a'r goll wedi'i gwahanol i'r bwysig i'n gwahanol i'r gwahanol. Ond y ddweud o'r bwysigio'n cael ei wneud yn ymgyrchwp, nid o'n cymryd o'r leisio'r ganana a'r bwysig sy'n gweithio'r bwysig iawn. I feel we've got a very good chance. We've got to be careful as well because we can't fall into the trap that the police will want us to fall into going going guns blazing. I think it's going to have to be a very similar performance to the West End one. Maybe it's about we just try to bore it out for the first half first hour and then we try to click into gear maybe as it goes on. It's got to be both teams similar. Ond yna'n sgwrd load o gobl o'r gael, a'r palys o'r pwysig yn 11, yn 11. Rydw i'n bwyllgor o'r gael os ydw i'n ni'n i'n 5. Symlwch i'n rhaid i'r palys oedd, o bwynt i'n un o'r bwysig yn y bwysig, ac o'r bwysig yn bwysig, o'r gael i'r ffordd i'r gael i'r tiantos i'r bwysig. Mae'r bwysig o'r bwysig yn bwysig o'r bwysig o'r bwysig, o'r bwysig o'r bwysig, a'r pwnnys ddim leiton os welwyddo i'r lovely break oedd e gollun. Dei have got that trecryst o palasthef, o'n bydd o'r peisi sad, dy'r obeith wel organised, as he's back now and he's a really, really good player, my new dda. From our perspective, it will be a case of... No, ever, I've got a decent record at Sellers Park to be fair. The games are always tight bad the FA Cup, quarterfinal under Franklin Pad. A few years ago, in general, the games are quite tight. But I do think that Everton and Sean Dyche will look at this and think even though these are a good side and a strong we can't take the maximum points here by almost... It is difficult because both teams, like you said before, don't really want the ball. But that was the case at the London Stadium a couple of weeks ago at West Ham and Everton profited that day from a good counterattack. And maybe that will be the game plan in this one. But we'll just toss the ball into the middle and both teams will shift back and go. Do you want to? I think the advantage Everton have is that we are away. So if there's one team that's going to be able to, without any pressure, really, sit off in terms of hand the other team up the possession, it's going to be Everton. But I think we have to be clear here. Like, at West Ham, we controlled what West Ham did. It wasn't just letting them have the ball and then not pressing them or letting them do what they wanted. We were very much in control of the situation all along. And we pressed at the right moment. So it's about kind of, I think the ideal is you maybe start by start conservative and then if you can get through that first 15 minutes with no like no goal mouth action, then you kind of start to just have those little digs and just basically get palace worrying. I think that's what we did against West Ham is there was the one that Harrison had in where we where we where we should have scored or should have should have teed to believe you on one of that came from pressing at the right time about half an hour in. And from then you could tell that West Ham were a bit shaky when they were passing out from the back because they were like, oh, well, we've made one mistake. What are we making over? And I think that's the key to it is is building up slowly. But when the opportunity presents itself like pouncing and then obviously if we can take one of those opportunities even better. Yeah, I'm not I'm not afraid of palace. Like I said, I think it's too very evenly matched sides all across the teams. Really, I think they're very similar. Absolutely. I mean, it's a game that could go either way. Of course, it is just in terms of that. Everton are actually top for team pressures in the Premier League this season. So we do we do kind of do that quite well. But yet they're a good side. But again, like you just said, it's not one I'm going near fearful of all of. Did you create a great atmosphere to tell us by things like that? But I do think for Everton, we have to start looking at this kind of game and saying, can we can we get the three points here? Obviously a victory will put Everton within a point to Crystal Palace as well of the weekend. Palace always seem to be no matter what's going on, they always seem to be in that middle, middle section in no danger whatsoever. So can we get a bit closer to them? And, you know, we obviously know that Roy Alton's good manager obviously has them well organised and it will be about quieting and then down a little bit early on and feeling our way into the game. The man that he has given his press conference and did say that he kind of expects Amadou O'n Arna to be ready at the weekend. He's been on the grass today. He's been on the grass. He's been jarebrant to put on the core. What type of grass? We don't know. Well, he picked up slight knocks, but he doesn't expect all three to be available. So that'll be a big boost, because I do think we missed on Amadou O'n Arna last week, didn't we? Yeah, I wrote a piece on more than a game this Monday that people who are subscribers can go and read, but it was about how, as well as Garnah played, I feel Amadou O'n Arna was a huge miss and not that that's breaking news, but I went into the stats a little bit as well. And Amadou O'n Arna's just leading the way in terms of the passing statistics forever. And there's been a tweet that's doing the rounds today about the over 14 and he's the leader in accurate long passes. And that shows he's adapting to what Sean Daish wants of him. And I just think he had such an element of control that no other midfielder that we have provides. James Garnah tends to just... I think I really like James Garnah and what I like most about James Garnah is him and Anna getting the best out of each other. But James Garnah does have a tendency to kind of go missing in matches. You never doubt his work rate, but if you can't get on the ball, having someone next to him who can and just keep that tempo going is so important. And we saw that against West Ham when at the end it was more about Anna getting his body in the right place and driving out with the ball and winning a foul and just relieving the pressure. So I think having him back is massive, but I hope that Daish is willing to use his subs, which is a big one here. Like I expect Yung to start, whether that's right or wrong, I prefer Paterson, but I do expect Yung. And with that, you've got to dress again again. Like you trust him. You've got to trust him. He plays him any time. You know, what gets me about Daish is he doesn't bring him on against West Ham when we needed him. But then he's happy to chuck him straight in from the start against Brighton. He's like, well, how can you trust him for one or not the other? So, you know, it's like after 70 minutes of an Anna's feeling his calf or James Garnah's a bit tired. Please use that sub because we need to. We can't just keep trying to see out games without making any changes. No, I think this weekend, obviously last weekend we didn't have Anna and there was no midfield sub whilst Daish and Garnah at this age, they played very well, but was tired near the end. And it's not a slight on Garnah at all, like a Daish and Garnah, like he played really well. He came and did the job that was asked of him. It's just that I think the balance of the team, just for what we need in a way game, Anna actually provides that more just because that's the ability on the board. And you want them options off the bench, don't you? Now, this is how Everton lined up last weekend. Obviously, Yung, Tarkovsley, Brantley, Michal Enco, a ni adharaeth yn Garnah y Drisigau, White McNeill, Adelaide D'Coreau, and Dominic Calvert-Lewin. Are we just expecting one change from that to be Amadou O'n Anna'r in for the Drisigau? Yeah, I'd like to see part of some play. I would, but it's not going on. But I just don't think it's going to happen. So I expect, yeah, Anna to come in for Drisigau on a game and the rest to be exactly the same. And you know, I do hope that, you know, I just hope, like I said, going back to the changes, I hope he makes proactive ones if needed. You know, we might, we might go through the game with three-nult by half time and imagine that and be happy. Or we might even be in a comfortable, you know, we might feel that we're in a comfortable position and not have to make changes. I think that I'm fine with that. It's just like last week, we evidently saw we need a change. And they play three games in six days. I think, you know, this is good week. They'll have had a nice day of recovery on Sunday. Imagine they were, I think they do the fitness work usually on a Monday and Tuesdays, that's like when the coaches get hold of it. And then they'll have come back in on Thursday, probably and started working on the shape and everything. And then tomorrow will be more of like a, you know, maybe the tactical video session and everything. So they'll be, I know it sounds mundane, but just having a normal week could be so important. I'd much rather be in the cup. So I've got nothing wrong with that, like, but just having that normal week of preparation, hopefully, we saw like against Westtown, we looked fresh, we looked well-drilled. Yeah, hopefully, we'll have that again against Palos. This is Crystal Palos' line-up last week in the 2-0 win at Burnley. They had Ward Anderson, Guy Mitchell at the back, then Lema and Jack McCorrie midfielding in the three. Jordan Aiyw Wilkes, Geoffrey Shlough and Hodgson Edward up top. Shlough, he got the first goal, wasn't it, in that one. And out of them, we've picked as, well, Ned's picked our danger man. For this game from Crystal Palos, like you said before, Ezzy is back, he will be my danger man. But this is Hodgson, Edward, so far this season, he is the Palos' top scorer. He's got 10 games, four goals, his XG at 2.9, so he's over-performing slightly. It's averaging 2.5 shots per game, and that is 0.39 on the XA. He's a player I really like, that's Celtic, and I'll be honest, when he was available, I would have liked Everton to go and say him, because I do think he's a good striker. Everton at the moment, two centre-backs have been, probably, overall, the stand-out performers this season. I think that's fair to say, that other players like Amadou Omnana who've been getting better and better, Michal Encoes had a good spell of late. It's great to have Don Bach and things like that, but I do believe Tarkovski and Brandt Lee have been, overall, Everton's best-tree performance this season. They'll have to work us out against Edward, but playing the way they are, you feel confident that you can potentially shackle him? Yeah, I think Edward hasn't scored in the league since the middle of September, so there's apologies, yeah, get the priest in. So expect the worst now, but he's one of those players that came from Scotland and had a really good record and then has found it tough to settle, but the towards-the-back end of last since Hodgson took over, really. Well, re-took over, and then this season has been really good. He's powerful, he's pretty athletic, he can hold the ball up, he can move in behind, his movement's always been pretty good, and he can score from anywhere, actually. He's got quite a good shot on him, but I do bat Tarkovski and Brandt with the way that they're playing to keep him well shackled. It's that thing of then Eze coming in, and I think he will start from that number 10 position or even from the wide left, you know, especially if Young's playing, he's not going to stick to the byline, he's going to very much look to drifting side. It was really interesting, I saw a tactical piece in the week and how Harrison had basically stopped Mitoma coming inside on Saturday. Harrison trapped Mitoma basically wherever he went in the first half, and he ended up with Mitoma moving out wide permanently in the second. Eventually, obviously, Brighton's goal comes from there, but I imagine Dice will be saying if Eze is playing on the left, on Palace's left, we're going to do a similar shot on him. Harrison's going to track him in field, and I think with Eze, it's quick, but he isn't as quick as Mitoma, he's as nimble. And I think what Dice will want is if we can stop Eze drifting in field from that position, keep that under lock and key, and we're then forcing him out wide, he'll be nowhere near as effective as a proper winger like Mitoma might be. So maybe that's going to be the key, is if he does play out there, keeping him under lock and key that way, and if he does play in the centre, anana and gana are probably going to have to make sure that he's always picked up by somebody. Yeah, absolutely, it's going to be a tough game, but like I said, it's an opportunity for Everton to keep a good little bit of form going. A win a beat tremendous going into the international break, obviously, Everton's last game before the next international break, and a win would be excellent, like I said, if we don't be delighted with that, wouldn't be, but again, if it's that old adage, isn't it, if you can't win and don't get beaten, if Everton were to end up with 12 points on Saturday night and from 12 games, then it's all right, it's not bad going into, obviously, we know when we come back after this international break, there's a hugely busy period that I think is opening. It's something like 10 games in December or something like that, going into a hectic period, but let's hope the Blues can go to Crystal Palace and get all three points.  Let us know what you think in the comments section below.  Give the video a thumbs up. Subscribe if you haven't subscribed to morethanagain.substack.com. I should know that. I advertise it every day. I should know it. More than a game YouTube as well. And yeah, let's keep building the channel and there's loads of brilliant stuff on there across all football as well, so you're not just Everton, but Plamonetag.substack.com. Do that. Thank you very much for watching. We'll see you later.


The thing that I think went well, that I think will always go well in any class that you allow children to talk and voice their opinions, are the discussion parts. They have a lot to say, so it bothers me to have to cut them off and say, let's move on to the next art document. But I know you will have 75 minutes of this one photograph. So, yeah, that's always been one of my struggles. The idea that I was hearing pretty much across the room is that American is a symbol of status, not necessarily a nationality or ethnicity. So, because they were all pretty much saying, you start off as an immigrant and then you become an American. So that's something that I am making a note of for my future lessons to play with that idea a little bit and see what we can do with that.