We've got a packed show for you today. We're talking about North Korea's Haidah Jumbong. We're talking about Will and Kate's baby, or baby to be, baby on the way. We're going to talk about the McStrike, the first strikes that have happened at McDonald's branches in the UK ever. Two of those happened today. And then we've secured an exclusive interview. Very exciting. This is a big deal. Aaron, what are we going to be, who have we got on the show? We're going to be interviewing the founder of Activate, which has been described as the analogue to, you know, the Tory analogue to momentum. We've got an exclusive story with him in regard to the future of the organisation and what next for it? It's a very, very, very big story. And if you're tuning in just for that, stick around. It's towards the end of the show, but explosive. Yeah, we're very excited about it. It's quite a coup in our media. I think a big coup. Yeah. So, onto the serious stuff. It's the unexpected story of the summer. North Korea are developing their nuclear capability at a vastly quicker pace than I think most people predicted. Yesterday, they tested their first H bomb. That's a hydrogen bomb for the wonky stuff. We're going to go to Vox now. So, I think that's going to come up on the screen. Vox.com. Vox.com. That's reclined. So, at noon, local time, on September the 3rd, a 6.3 magnitude earthquake registered at North Korea's Pungri testing site that indicated Pyongyang detonated a hydrogen bomb with a hundred kiloton yield, which would make the device around seven times stronger than the bomb America dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. This was the country's six nuclear tests and it's first during the Trump administration. Lots of big numbers there. Lots of kind of confusing words. Aaron, you're going to start by explaining the difference between a hydrogen bomb and an atom bomb. Yes. North Korea already had tested an atom bomb, but this is their first hydrogen bomb. That's right. So, an atom bomb was obviously used in Hiroshima. Little boy, as it was called. And this weapon was significantly stronger than that. An atom bomb uses nuclear fission. A hydrogen bomb uses fission and fusion. So, it has the initial atom bomb and then it's joined by a separate nuclear process, a distinct one, which amplifies the effects. It's much, much more powerful. The most powerful nuclear weapon ever used was the Zarbama weapon dropped by the Soviets in 1961. I think that had 50 megatons of TNT. So, it's a couple of thousand times more powerful than Hiroshima. Now, that was a bomb, right? And these are on missiles. So, naturally, the payload is going to be a lot smaller and even American ICBMs, intercontinental ballistic missiles, are much smaller than the Zarbama, but this is still significantly bigger than what we saw in Hiroshima. And that killed around 100,000 people. So, in a major urban centre, this could kill a million plus people. Yeah. And you mentioned the difference between a bomb and a missile. So, another reason North Korea has been in the news this summer isn't just because they're creating bigger bombs, but they're also creating better missiles. So, it looks like they're at the verge of creating an intercontinental ballistic missile which would get these nuclear bombs to, well, which could get these nuclear bombs to American cities, which is a much more surefire way of landing a bomb than dropping it from a plane in the sky. Well, yeah, like a strategic bomber is a very limited delivery system, which is why we had the Cuban missile crisis, right?  So, today, the likes of the UK, the United States, can use an ICBM and hit anywhere in the world. Obviously, the number one form of nuclear deterrent is something at sea because then you can't have a preemptive strike, which is why Trident, we have four nuclear submarines in this country, one's always at sea. So, you always have a deterrent which people can't hit preemptively. In a secret location. Precisely. But this is very, they're joining a very elite club by first getting nuclear weapons, but hydrogen, hydrogen thermo, they're called thermonuclear weapons. I don't believe the likes of Pakistan or India have them. Or maybe not, but it's pretty elite technology. Yeah, these discussions can often get a bit wonky, a bit technical. I often lose track of kilotons and megatons. So, that's why we often compare things to Hiroshima. We say it's six times more powerful than the one that was dropped on Hiroshima. To remind ourselves of sort of horror that caused, you had a section from a podcast that I think you must have listened to recently, Dan Carlin. Dan Carlin. Good podcast. Yeah, it's a good podcast. And there's an excerpt we're about to play. And it's from the diary of a Japanese woman who lived and worked in Hiroshima. She was in the midst of all that. She was unaffected because she had the good fortune of being in a toilet and it was insulated. God knows what led or iron or whatever, but she was fine. But her entire family wasn't. So, I think we're going to cut to that excerpt now for people watching. This is quite graphic. So, if you're not watching, don't watch it. Looking around for my sister, I saw her lying sprawled in the corridor, the right side of her body covered with terrible burns. She had probably been washing her hands with her right hand stretched over the wash basin when caught by the searing heat. I put my sister on my back and fled barefoot to Hajima Park. Her face was festering from her burns and her right eye was hanging out. I pushed the eye back into its socket and tried to use a gauze mask to hold it into place, but her ear had melted away and there was nothing to attach the mask to. Her mouth was twisted to the right and she could do no more than whimper for water, only the first syllable of the word emerging distinctly. On reaching Hijiyama Park, I laid my sister down on the ground and set off to search for my children. The fires were still burning fiercely. In a streetcar that had been burned bright red, surrounded by people already killed by the fire, I saw a woman still holding on to a strap and calling for help. The intense heat prevented me from approaching her, however. There was nothing I could do. To a man sitting on some stone steps, I said, come on, let's get away from here, and pulled him up by the hand. But as I did so, the skin came away from his hand and he fell slowly to the Yeah, so obviously pretty, pretty tough to listen to, and I recommend for people who are ambivalent about nuclear weapons research what happened Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It's just terrifying. It's worse than any dystopia we could probably imagine, and yet, as we've said, the weapons are far, far more powerful. I think the ICBM warheads that the U.S. has is about 300 kilotons, which is about three times more powerful than what North Korea's just tried to use, more than 10 times more powerful than Hiroshima. Just devastating weapons.  So I mean, obviously, today we're talking about this because North Korea's developed increased nuclear capacity. Increased nuclear capacity doesn't always, well, it is only once in human history translated into the actual use of a nuclear weapon in war, which was in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Bioliberal democracy, right? Bioliberal democracy, yep. And crucially when only one country had the nuclear bomb. So we're going to look at the reactions to this development, to North Korea's test, and think about what might happen. Does this spell nuclear war or is this for show? Or not quite for show, but is it something that we can... A deterrent, right? A deterrent, yeah. That's a rational argument. They don't want the United States to mind it. We have one. Why shouldn't North Korea have one? Anyway, we're going to start with international reactions. And we're going to start where any conversation about international relations should start these days, which is Donald Trump's tweets. He didn't waste much time in getting them out. These should be coming up now. Let's see those tweets. So he hits out, first of all, not at North Korea, but at South Korea, interestingly, accuses them of appeasement. And that's because they've got a... this should be coming up. That's because they've got a more liberal government that's taking a less hawkish line than him. Obviously at the moment America are getting... It's in the news because people in America and American cities are worried that they might be able to get hit by a North Korean bomb. South Koreans and Japan have had to live under that fear for a much longer period of time. They tend to be less inclined to save a rattle. If there is... if military action does start, it will be them that are hit first. I'm not sure if they are going to come up. Anyway, he says it's an embarrassment to China. And then he says, hey, there we go. And then he says, the final one, which is... So, yeah, South Korea. Then we've got our final one, which is he says that America, as a next strategy, might cut off trade with any country that does trade with North Korea. Most significantly that would be with China. What would happen if the U.S. cut off trade with China, Aaron? Well, first I just want to say, in regard to South Korea point, this is really consistent because people like to say, oh, Donald Trump's erratic. He's a madman. He makes no sense. He's irrational. Those tweets are a very, very, very clear continuation of what he's always said. He's always been very angry at the U.S.'s allies. He's always been more angry at the U.S.'s allies than his enemies. Because he says, we're paying for your defense. Europe, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Kuwait. We're paying for your defense. Pay for your own defense. So the animosity he's showing South Korea, they're very, very consistent. And then with China, obviously, like he said, it's clearly directed to China, because they are the biggest trading partner in North Korea. Chinese exports to the United States are huge, but they also buy huge amounts of U.S. sovereign debt. So it would collapse the world of the economy. It would be 2008 on steroids if America cut off trade with China. But again, for decades now, he's talked about the U.S. running a trade deficit with powers in East Asia. It used to be Japan. More recently, it's been China. And that's because they have an undervalued currency. So I think these overtures he's making, yes, it's trying to send the signal to Pyongyang and to North Korea, but it's also saying to South Koreans, we pay for your defense. We don't get much in return, which is kind of true. I mean, they're the global hegemon. That's what they get in return. And then to the Chinese, it's saying, we're in the middle of a trade war. And even though you screw us in regard to devalued currency, you're not even keeping this potentially nuclear state on a tight leash. So I mean, it's what he's saying is rational when you look at it like that in regard to not just North Korea, so China and South Korea. So I mean, so what we have in terms of not necessarily the way he's doing on Twitter, but in terms of criticizing South Korea, in terms of asking the Chinese to keep North Korea on a leash, because they're the ones that matter in this. Well, I don't I'm not sure if it is rational, actually.  Well, look, there's a rationale, but there's a rational now. I think what Kim Jong-un is doing seems more rational. But in terms of outcomes, you've got the first outcome, which is what the USA wants, which is that more pressure is put on North Korea. Sanctions are tightened and extended to China. So China stops trading with North Korea. That would be them stopping importing textiles. But the nuclear option to use a word out of context would be for them to cut off oil to North Korea. If they do that, most analysts agree the Kim regime will fall quite quickly. And that's what the Americans are really going to be pressuring them to do. The danger here is that when is Kim most likely to use a nuclear weapon, if he thinks that his regime is going to fall anyway?  I mean, it's a completely it would be completely different. I mean, the US has been effectively defeated in Iraq because of a guerrilla war, a 10 year protracted low intensity guerrilla war. In North Korea, it would be a very disciplined, ideologically loyal nation. It's very, very different. I mean, it would be it would be hell on earth the United States. They wouldn't they wouldn't be able to have a land based intervention into North Korea. It's not going to happen. So regime change through maybe starving it of energy supplies. Yes. Now, but the danger is that if Kim feels like the regime is about to fall, then even if it's just because of economic reasons, they said it made the economy scream by cutting off oil. That's when you'd be most likely to use some sort of nuclear capability. Turn it back on. I don't think they would because then obviously that there would be licensed the US to completely destroy the country. I think even just using conventional war, I think they'd be okay. So you're not that worried about what's called a strategic miscalculation where? Well, you've always got to be worried, right? Yeah. You think it could happen? I mean, it's a miracle it didn't happen in the course of the 20th century. It could always happen. But I don't think this, if you look at the variables here and say this means it's very likely that there'd be a nuclear war, the North Koreans could fight a conventional war and be very good at it. You know, they still have these missiles. They don't need to put nuclear warheads on them. They can still send them to Tokyo. They can still send them to Seoul. They can still send them to Guam or Hawaii. Well, except no, because the reason you wouldn't use conventional weapons is because North Korea in any other weapons other than nuclear bombs, they'd get destroyed. It's only a nuclear bomb that gives them some sort of strategy. Yeah, but in terms of defensively, not really.  It was these all derivatives of the German V-2 rocket, right? Which wasn't a nuclear weapon. So you could use these or there's a weapon called a thermobaric weapon, which is a very, very powerful weapon which uses similar technologies. So you could use, you know, you could use this. This still shows a very sophisticated level of weapons technology without using nuclear stuff. And I think, I just think the idea of an American military intervention in North Korea's batshit is not going to happen. Probably the most positive analysis I've read of this situation, and why I think that Donald Trump's tweets probably aren't that rational in terms of what's going to be the best outcome here, is that this in fact normalizes relations. So this is a quote from Bong Young-Shik, who's an authority on North Korea at Seattle's Yonsei University. This is quoted from the FT. So he says, actually I don't know if it's a he or a she. King Jong-un now understands that Washington does not have the ability to crank up its maximum pressure strategy any further. He understands Washington does not realistically have a military option. The only option for Washington is for Washington to recognize North Korea as a nuclear state and hope to contain it like with the Soviet Union. So basically what's that saying is give up on stopping proliferation in North Korea, accept that they are now a nuclear power, and try and bring them to the table, and make sure that no strategic miscalculation does happen. Yeah, I'd agree with that. So that's one of the reasons why America and the Soviet Union ended up getting coming to the table and saying like, let's stop doing things by surprise because we don't want to accidentally blow up the blood. But a few funny things. First of all, the United States and their soul are relatively well balanced, right? So America gets nuclear weapons first, but the Red Army had half of Europe, and there was a genuine belief in 1945 that they would go all the way to the Atlantic. So if you're in the US, what cars do you have? Well, you have the Manhattan Project. You know, the Soviets have half of Berlin. They're in Poland. They're in Hungary. What's the Manhattan Project? The bomb. Yeah, the A-bomb, the atomic weapons, right? So you've got this incredible army.  And in a conventional war, I think it was widely recognized that they would have handed the angst asked them on a plate, right, despite how weird it's all history in Britain, the English-speaking world. So they were evenly balanced. And even then, there were a number of standoffs, which could have gone really badly wrong. So I agreed to the extent that it normalizes things, but I still think, I'll go back to what I said previously, it was a miracle we didn't have one of these, we didn't have a nuclear war in the 20th century, in the 50s or in the 60s, or, you know, even under Yeltsin, there was a near-miss in 95. I mean, this isn't good. The more, I don't think the more nuclear states, the better. I don't buy that. I don't think the better, but I mean, the precedent for the USSR was that basically both sides accepted the other one wasn't going to give up the nuclear weapons, because it was completely rational for them to keep them. So they didn't really bother with sanctions or anything. They said, okay, we can both completely destroy each other. Let's get to the table and make sure that doesn't happen by accident. Yeah, I mean, that was never, that was never inevitable, right? General McCarthy wants to use nuclear weapons. No, it wasn't inevitable, but that's one of the reasons why they were pushed to it, because they got so close. Yeah. But also, I think, sometimes we look at history structurally, and we talk about the big macro dynamics, but it's also about personal decisions. Harry Truman didn't want to use nuclear weapons, right? There was a moment where America had nuclear weapons, the Russians didn't. You know, very high-ranking people in the US army, like MacArthur in Asia, said we should use these against the Russians, because we need war. It's about winning. So you use all the tools at your disposal, and Truman didn't agree. So, yeah. Final thoughts. Should the UN, should the USA, should China accept North Korea is now a nuclear state? We have to treat it as one. We're going to stop bothering applying pressure for them to get rid of their capabilities, and treat them like we do Britain, France, China. If you were America, you'd say we recognize your right to nuclear weapons, but we think you should unify and become a liberal democratic United Korea. Oh, interesting. You get rid of Kim that way, but you recognize nuclear weapons. But then the Chinese, they want a nice satellite state. So, yes. I mean, if I was at the Pentagon, you'd want sort of a shill liberal democratic government with nukes in South Korea. We're going to move on in a second, but out of our media, we're a bit like Corbyn. We're like political peaceful solutions. We think conversation is what can solve the world's problems. And we've thought of a way that we can solve this problem, make sure a strategic miscalculation doesn't happen, and at the same time make quite good TV. It's going to be called Kim Dying with me. Kim Dying with me, okay. Trump, Kim, he's obviously a guy that likes food. They chat. You know, we've both got nuclear bombs. Let's just chill. Make sure it doesn't escalate a couple of beers. Yeah. Stop communicating by Twitter and, you know. As everybody seems to say these days, we've got so much more in common there, what separates us. And you know, I've heard that Donald Trump likes kimchi. Is that true? So, you know, we have so much more in common. We're going to go from one unelected dynasty to another. Will and Kate should be coming on the screen. Kate is pregnant. Yeah. Proud moment for Britain. Very proud. You proud, Britain? It's not normally something we'd cover on Navarra, but it is a particularly opportune moment to point out the predictable hypocrisy of the British establishment. This comes, so the announcement of this pregnancy, which is obviously being celebrated by all of our brave, compliant press, comes five months after reforms are introduced, which punishes ordinary families for having more than two children. So if you have children beyond your first two, you can't claim child benefit for them. And the argument, this was a George Osborne policy. So the argument was that if you can't afford to maintain free kids, you shouldn't have free kids. Who do you think pays for Will and Kate's kids? What's Kate's job? What's Will's job? I don't know. Yeah.  There you go. Yeah. So Buckingham Palace, the Queen's taxpayer fund, was doubled from 42 million to 82 million. That's partly to maintain the Royal Palace, which whatever little lizard comes out here, will be able to live in its old age. That's a lot of baby clothes, that. That's a lot of baby clothes. Big rooms. Big rooms. Yeah. Biggest scroungers on the planet. Free kids is OK for them. But if you've got a real job, if you work minimum wage at McDonald's, stick to two, all right?  It's completely batshit. Yeah, it's completely batshit. But like you said, what else do they do? William, I think he used to fly helicopters. Harry was a liability fundamentally in the British Army. He was so brave in Afghanistan, not really. Because if anybody has any idea who the guy is. Yeah, he probably needs about, like, an operation of 20 people just to protect him. He was putting this entire regiment at risk. What, so that he can feel good about himself?  No. You're not a normal guy, OK? Sorry.  Oh, you're not going to do that, are you? So... We'll put him on Bradson Island, like we just heard about last time. HMP Necker Island. HMP Necker. I know, at the Royals, I just think, we do what the Italians did after 1945. You... What did they do? You're going to have to give me a history lesson again. The country became a Republic by referendum, which is what I would prefer in this country. I think it's a referendum, which we would lose, by the way, right now, but I would want... I would want to change that. It's worth a go. I'd want to change that, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I accept that most Brits want to keep the royal family. I think that change after Elizabeth passed away. And after the Republican case was won, it's now illegal for the Italian royal family to re-enter the country. Oh, really? The House of Savoy. They cannot legally enter... Well, maybe it's been changed in the last year or two. So where do they live? I think the Crown Prince lives in Switzerland. But the last time I checked, they couldn't legally enter the country, and they were asking for the laws to be changed because they wanted to live as normal citizens. But I don't think that should happen. Yeah, I'd ban them. Ban them? Ban them. Let's get them out. And they leave them a certain amount of private wealth. That's it. Go live in Monte Carlo or whatever. I mean, Harry probably wants to do that. Yeah, let them off. I wonder what way they'd campaign in the referendum. Anyway, for more details about the reforms that punish ordinary people for having three children, and the scrounging that our royal family do, Mike Steggeloff, friend of the show, wrote a very good article in Huck Magazine today. Recommend it.  The seg. We're going to move from... This is the big... Royal slobs. Yeah. Oh, no, you've got one. What are you going to say? No, we're going to go from royal slobs to working class heroes. This is the big source, other than activate. Yeah. This is big. And the bomb. In Britain, right? Yeah, this is the big story in Britain. Which is, for the first time ever, there are strikes in two branches of McDonald's. They were today. McDonald's employs 85,000 people. So if this movement spreads, this would be a very, very big deal. It's still very small at the moment. So I think it was 40 people that voted to go on strike in two branches. But even though there is historic in an industry where union organizing has struggled fundamentally. So this is partly inspired by the struggle for $15 in the USA. Fight for 15. Fight for 15. And it looks like, yeah, union organizing is back on the agenda in the service industry. They're fighting for an end-to-zero-riles contract, £10 minimum wage, basic demands, things that you can't really argue with.  You'd have to be a right twat to argue with, wouldn't you? We're going to cut some people on Twitter to see that. We've got some twats. Okay, some Twitter twats. So here's... Which one's this? Stephanie Latham, a £10 minimum wage. Why bother getting qualifications, degrees, professions when you can flip burgers in a piss easy job for the same wage? Hashtag McStrike. What do you think of that, Bostano? It doesn't... It was that Stephanie Latham, was it? Yeah, uh-oh. None of that's it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. I mean, look, £10 an hour. If you think £10 an hour is the going... That's £400 a week, £20,000 a year. You're saying, I'm going to go to university and we're getting £40 grand debt. And then I'm going to earn £20 grand a year. £20 grand a year doesn't pay for children. When you're... She's young, right?  She could just tweet about people being poor and how they deserve it. You can't care for aging parents. You can't buy a home. You can't save. You can't have a pension.  We have to care for somebody, right? So she's talking nonsense. And it is not an argument to say, oh, we've had falling pay for people with degrees. Therefore, the people that should suffer are the very poorest and most vulnerable. Ridiculous. Next. Next tweet. I've even got Suzy this time. Suzy. Suzy. McDonald's workers on strike because they want £10 an hour. Go and get an actual decent job and stop expecting handouts. And this is from Suzy Lou GME on Twitter. And guess what Suzy's job is? Tell me your job. Guess. I've got it. She's a professional YouTuber. She's a professional YouTuber.  Are you kidding me? It's hard work doing YouTube, isn't it? But I think feeding people is kind of more important, right? I mean, it's kind of more important. I don't know. Suzy.   So two things here. Firstly, everybody should be paid enough to live. But who's getting a handout, right? Because the taxpayer, including these people, pay for education. They pay for infrastructure, roads. They pay for healthcare. It's not some miracle that you get literate, healthy workers turning up to work every day. It's not a miracle. We all pay for that collectively. Okay. So we're subsidizing the labor force that McDonald's benefit from, right?  A proper job. We're all subsidizing that and it's cheap labor for McDonald's and then McDonald's are creaming off the profits. So McDonald's don't even need to pay their works enough to live because the taxpayer will pay housing benefit. The taxpayer will subsidize education and primary and secondary schools. So the handout here is going to big business. The handout here in this rig system, it's not going to the workers on less than 10 pounds an hour. It's going to the bosses, going to the millionaires, the people at the top. So Suzy, I'm sorry, you couldn't be more wrong. That's the civilized I get with people like this. Who defines wages as handouts? It's ideology, isn't it, right? It's bizarre. Completely bizarre. It's ideology. The idea that wealth is not created by capital. Wealth is created by labor. Okay. When you buy, no, but this, you don't just, that's the, where does value come from? It doesn't just come, you know, this is not the magic money tree. On the one hand, they say the magic money tree and then when it comes to actually creating wealth, they think it's a magic money tree. No, it's workers work and they add value to things, right? That's why you have to pay them. Are you into the labor theory of value? No, I don't think you have to have a labor theory of value for this. I'm not saying prices reflect labor. I'm saying that labor adds value. Price and value are two separate things. Solidarity with the strikers and McDonald's today. You're heroes and we hope that spreads throughout the country. Every McDonald's, all of these goddamn chains. Every Burger King. I think everybody working on full-time pay in this country should be on the medium wage, 26 grand. It's actually 10 pound an hour is kind of like, you know. Yeah, what do you say? So 10 pound an hour is 20 K a year. Yeah, I'd have at 12, 13 pounds an hour. Yeah, I agree. Ideally. We're agreeing on that. We've all we've got left is our exclusive interview, haven't we? We're going to go to a very quick break and then we have an exclusive for you, the founder of Activate. This is not a wind-up. Don't go away. Over the last 10 years, things have really changed. But for all the darkness, every cause has an effect. For all the talk of change, the present moment is really one of crisis. A crisis of democratic representation. Of identity.  Of a failing economic model, which isn't working for most people. We can't have a media that's beholden to advertisers or the political ambitions of oligarchs. Which is why in 2013, we founded Novara Media. Unlike corporate media, we are funded by our subscribers. There's no tax avoiders. There's no oil money and there's no lords. What we're creating is media for you, which quite simply, you make possible. Looking to raise £40,000, that will allow us to not only keep on paying our contributors, but give them a little bit more, as well as keep our studio and take our fantastic Novara events nationwide. To help us get there, go to support.novaramedia.com and give a one-off donation, or even better, sign up for a subscription. We've already achieved so much, but the truth is, we've barely started. So we're joined by the founder of Activate. It's a pleasure. Into the Viper's Nest, the heart of the hard left. The hard left, yeah. This is Thomas Wellington. Thanks for joining us, Thomas. It's a pleasure, Aaron. Pleasure, Michael. We've had a bit of pushback from our audience, but we thought it's important. It's a big story. So much for the tolerant left. Well, I mean, yeah. We're going to keep this about you, man. We're going to keep this exact list. Let's just try and keep it civilized. Folks, I expect it's a big story. Activate has sought to identify itself as a sort of Tory analogue to momentum. There's been some teething problems, it's fair to say. First question, will Activate be carrying on? Is it over? What's the score? It's been a try in a few weeks. We've had a split in the organization. We've had a couple of controversies. There was one group of Activate who wanted to be a kind of a Theresa May fan club. No real political vision. They are gone. We are now focused on getting the next Prime Minister of Britain into number 10. And who's that? Jacob Riggs Morg. We've got momentum on our side. Nothing's going to stop us now. Right. So this is the splits within Activate is pro-may and pro-morg. Pro-morg. So that's the split. So the pro-may, they're gone. Don't think about them. They're gone. I mean, I know there's a split, but it was unclear to me until today that this was why. They might be at their branch meetings. They might activate. Nothing to do with them. Right. Okay. Were you aware of the WhatsApp group and the comments made in regard to gassing chaps? Children. Right. You know, Whom's to us as children? But they're gone. You know, we have laws in this country. We have conservative values. Yeah. And they're gone. It is illegal to gas people in this country. It is very much against the law. Yeah. But, I mean, morally, do you not find it quite problematic as well? Forget the law for a second. Do you not disagree with it morally? With conservative values. Right. They are, you know, everyone...  These are just children. Most people don't think of children and think they talk in WhatsApp group about gassing chaps. And I think what most people would say is that your organisation is only going to attract people who are... We have some quite unpleasant views about the world, actually. I mean, how are you trying to attract young people to conservatism? And are we not going to see scandal after scandal after scandal of people who fundamentally want to promote hate? We're not living in a world of polished people. You know, managerial politics, David Cameron, Tony Blair, Clinton. You know, we have... We're in the age of Sanders, Trump, Corbin. You know, so the people come from the grassroots... You want to be the UK alt-right? You said Trump, presumably you're Trump, you're not Sanders or Corbin. You want to be the UK alt-right? Pepe Frogs, Richard Spencer. I mean, I think memes have their place. Are we the alt-right? It's different culture. It's different political culture. But you said that you identified conservative values. You're backing Jacob Rees-Mogg. You've just drawn... He's a true Tory, he's a true Britain. But you said you don't like the politics even of a David Cameron and you identified him as somebody, you know, on a par with Clinton or Blair. So what are those conservative values? If they're not the values of David Cameron, but then you're citing a sort of political moment we're in and you're identifying Trump, I mean, what are those conservative values? It's traditional values. Of, I mean, look at Jacob Rees-Mogg. He has, you know, an air about him, which harkens back to better times of, you know, prosperity where we made things. And this is something Trump talks about. But what... I understand he's posh, but what's that got to do with an industrial policy? I mean, do you have any policies? Where the... Does momentum have any policies? Well, that's a good point, I suppose. That's a good question. Yeah, that's a good point, yeah, yeah. No, but it has an agenda that drives it and they're open about that. Progressive value. Progressive values are more democratic society and more equal society. So what does that actually actually want? We're in Jacob Rees-Mogg into number 10 with his family, his pets. The entire estate, the Mogg estate will be in number 10. All right, let's forget the motivations. Let's forget the politics or what drives you. Do you have the power to get Jacob Rees-Mogg into number 10? How's this going to happen? Yeah, are there Tory MPs who want the same thing as you do you think? I mean, that's for the Conservative Party to decide. Right. We are an independent organisation and we will lobby our local MPs as momentum does. Right. Okay, well, I think that's... Yeah, I think that's all we need to know. Yeah, I mean, what next for Activate? What's the next big thing? We have a press release. Yeah. We are breaking with the leadership of the Conservative Party. Yeah. We are going hard for Jacob Rees-Mogg and he... You can see on our Twitter page, we have a press release and it is online. The only Activate page on Twitter. Go on there. Our press release is there. Join the movement. Let's activate Britain. There's obviously a number of parodies, but that's the real one. And... It's a grassroots movement. You're going to have parodies. Well, I meant to mention a lot of parodies to be fair. Okay, well, thanks for that, Thomas. We are back next Monday. I think that's it. We're doing a Tisgy Sal this week. Yeah, we're going to do Tisgy Sal this week. And I think Navarra FM is back on Friday. But we will see you on the fix next Monday. You've been wonderful. See you next week.


about Great Cliff Exploration. Hope you're all having a great day. We are streaming on all social media platforms. Hope you're all having a great day. Nice to see you guys today. This is Rich for Mitch to be live, and we are streaming on all social platforms right now. That's right. We are streaming on all social platforms right now. Talk to you today about Great Cliff Exploration. Great Cliff Exploration. Now, this is actually a stock that I've talked about before, and we're gonna talk about it again. And I love when I identify undervalued, underappreciated, underexposed opportunities before they explode. That's been our modus operandi. We've been doing it for four years since 2017. And I believe we are doing it now at this point better than anybody else on the planet discovering undervalued, underappreciated, underexposed opportunities before they explode. And this is one that everyone should put on their watch list immediately. Great Cliff Exploration Limited. Symbol is gray in Canada, G-R-A-Y. Symbol is G-R-Y-C-F in America on the OTC exchange. And the symbol in Frankfurt, Germany is G-O, G-E-O. So I'm gonna explain to you why we're gonna go through this. And I'm gonna explain to you why I believe that this is undervalued, underappreciated, underexposed. Now, we are live and interactive. Thank you guys for joining us. Thank you guys for being here. In order for us to get this word out, it really helps if you smash the like button, comment on the video, share the video everywhere, and subscribe. And if you have a comment about the video, please put it in the comment section. If you are watching this video and it's not live, please put a comment in the description section of the video. If you like the stock, if you have a question about the stock, please let us know. The more we communicate, the better we understand what the people think. And we're all about the people here at Rich TV Live. So I hope you guys are all having a great day. It's been a very interesting week. Obviously the markets have been extremely choppy. A lot of people are calling it a crash.  So we're clearly not in a crash. So, I mean, anyone who's calling this a crash is clearly missing something because we're not in a crash. We're near all time highs. What's happening is the market's coming back from all time highs, which is pretty standard. Now, this is the website for graycliffeexploration.com. And if you wanna learn more about graycliffe exploration, just go to the website, graycliffeexploration.com. And if you go to Weeble, you can see here on Weeble that they are actually at 71 cents in Canada. And if I was to mark up the chart, this is the last year, you can see that they've been as high as 80 cents. They've been as low as, let's see here, 30 cents. Bitcoin took off and gold lost its steam. Digital gold took over for gold. Now what's happening is that Bitcoin is retracing and losing steam. And it looks as though gold is starting to come back into favor and metals is starting to come back into favor. So this might be the time to start considering or at least putting graycliffe exploration on your watch list, put it on your radar symbol, G-R-A-Y. And you can see, like I said, it's been as low as 30 cents, been as high as 80 and currently right now at 71 cents. And when you go to their website, it shows the US symbol, G-R-Y-C-F, let's pull that up. G-R-Y-C-F, there it is, graycliffe exploration in America and closed yesterday at 56 cents and up 15%. And if we do a one year chart again for them, oh, this is the one year chart. So you can see on the one year chart it's been as low as 17 cents, been as low as 17 cents and as high as 56, which it hit the high of 56 yesterday. So yesterday it hit it's all time high in America at 56. So exploration, so the timing might be right for you guys to put this on your watch list, put it on your radio and consult a financial advisor and let the financial advisor tell you whether or not you should be investing in this stock. I'm just here for education and information purposes to let you know about the company on TOBAF and 91, still holding 535 shares, wrote it up to 417. Hey, well done, well done on Tatlifestyle and Well, Gold, I love Silver, I love Copper. And if you've been watching Rich TV Live, I've been talking about Copper stocks, Silver stocks and Gold stocks for quite some time. I'm also a very big fan of Cobalt. I'm also a big fan of Lithium. I mean, there's so many metals that I'm a fan of right now because the reality is this is all needed right now. We're living in a world where all of these precious metals are needed for many different reasons and we're gonna get into it. Their best bet therefore would be to invest in precious mining stocks, specifically junior miners after witnessing shares of Northern dynasty minerals surged from 36 Canadian on January 4th, 2021 to 75 cents by March 17th, 2021, 132% gain in three months and Denison's mines 70% gain over the same timeframe. I believe Canadian based Graycliff exploration, Gray in Canada, GRAY, GRYCF in America on the OTC QX exchange or QB exchange and GEO in Frankfurt, Germany can have just as much upside potential. Now let's talk about six investment highlights for Graycliff exploration. So first and foremost, they are located in the prolific Shakespeare Gold horizon stretching over nine kilometers long. Recent core drilling program intersected high grade gold of 5.37 grams a ton of gold over five meters and near surface mineralization of 5.51 grams a ton of gold over 4.6 meters. The board has strong management expertise in gold startups and a track record of success in Canada. Tightly held structure with management and strategic investors owning over 60% of the company, excellent infrastructure including road access on the property. You can drive on the Trans-Canada Highway to get to the project. So those are six great reasons and also a very low burn rate. So let's just do a quick corporate overview on Graycliff exploration. Good morning, Robert. How are you doing this morning? Green Bull says, I made five times on TAT so far one of my best stock purchases. My son thanks you for his four wheeler. Hey, whatever I can do to help. I appreciate it. And the reality is we're just getting started folks. We're always looking for winners and we're always looking for winners first. And in my opinion, we identify more undervalued, underappreciated, under exposed opportunities than anybody else on the planet because we spent a lot of time doing this, doing the research. Jacob Chamberlain says, good morning, Rich. I love your stuff. You should do a video on NWBO, Northwest Biotherapeutics. Hey, thank you for the pick already down and definitely add it to my watch list. And if I like it, I may do a video. Absolutely, N-W-B-O. All right. So thank you for the pick. And if you guys have any picks you want me to look at, please share it in the chat and I'll do my best to try to break it down. And if I like it, I'll let you know for sure. Graycliff exploration is a junior mining exploration company with 100% interest in the Shakespeare Gold Project in Ontario, Canada. The project lies in well-known geology on the prolific Canadian Shield at the contact between the Archian southern and superior geological provinces. Although the stock has experienced some weakness over the past months, the stock appears to be gearing up for a rebound between February 16, 2021 and March 17, 2021. Gray stock has gone from 45 cents to 54 cents, translating to a nice 20% gain in the past month. Now this was before the last few days. It's actually trading higher. You can see it's at 56 cents in America, but in Canada it's actually at 71 cents. So since this article was written, the stock has already climbed. Now the question is, will this continue? That's the million dollar question and that's what we're trying to identify. Now my opinion, I would never chase anything that's green. I would like to just put on my watch list, put on my radar and wait for a dip. That's my strategy. It works for me. It works for our members. It works for our trading club. It works for our community. Watch a stock, identify a company you really like and then watch them for a dip. And we've seen recently that almost everything has dips.  I love this pick. As soon as you see a sign of weakness and you see it starts to come down, lock in your profits. That's the rich system. That's what works for me. That's what's working for our team and our community. And that will work for you if you learn to use that trading strategy. Now, currently Graycliffe is rated as a strong buy according to technical indicators on investing.com with six of eight technical indicators showing buy signals and all moving averages indicating buy signals. Gray has established a support at the 45 cent level. But the resistance level at 53 is what investors should keep a close eye on because once it's broken, the stock could move even higher. And obviously it broke that area and that's why today they're at 71 cents. These are all the technicals. You can see these are the technicals on investing.com. So lots of buys and a strong buy. You can see they currently have a market capitalization of roughly 8.9 million. So still a baby market cap, baby market cap and the Shakespeare property, the Graycliffe expiration Shakespeare property is located in Shakespeare Township, approximately 80 kilometres west of Sudbury, Ontario. It consists of 24 mineral claims covering 517 hectares into contiguous blocks. This is what it looks like. These are all the zones. Properties located in the area of the Shakespeare gold mine which was in operation from 1903 to 1907. A total of 2,959 ounces of gold were produced from six underground levels, Gordon, 1979. Historic exploration was completed on the property intermittently between 1938 and 2014, including trenching, sampling and limited drilling. Based on descriptions of the mineralization at the Shakespeare mine, the exploration model suggests for the Shakespeare property is the model for organic gold deposits. Goldfarb et al 2005, organic gold deposits dominantly form in metamorphic rocks in the mid to shallow crust, five to 15 kilometres depth. According to research from Graycliffe exploration, the Shakespeare mine produced 2,959 ounces of gold between 1903 and 1907, generating roughly US $56,000 in revenue when gold was at $19 per ounce. Could you imagine gold at $19 an ounce? Everything goes up over time, as you could see. Back in October last year, Graycliffe exploration started a 2,000-metre core drilling program along the six-kilometre perspective gold horizon and initial results have been quite impressive. Company reported 5.51 grams a ton of gold over 4.6 metres near the surface and resulted in expanding the gold mineralization zone under exploration at the Shakespeare project. Earlier this month, Graycliffe further reaffirmed the prospects of the project after intersecting high-grade near-surface mineralization of 5.37 grams a ton of gold over five metres. Now, let's talk about their leadership team. Now, we like to not just look at companies, but we like to look under the hood. We want to know what the management team is. We want to know who's running these companies. We want to know what their experience. We want to know everything and that's why we have success because we really break these companies down. We don't just hear about a stock and buy it. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. That's not our system. No, we like to do the research. We like to do the due diligence. We want to know everything about this company. In fact, we like to date the stocks, okay? So, strong leadership team could take this company to new heights. First and foremost, Graycliffe's president, James McIntosh, has over 34 years of experience in mineral exploration, mining research analysis, corporate finance and management of private and public resource companies, while the company's team of technical advisors like Don McKinnon, Junior and Bruce Durham have strong track records of finding and developing exciting gold properties in Canada. All right. So that was a really good breakdown. And boom, look at this. We are ready up folks. So Graycliffe exploration now at 73 cents and already up. So this is a good start to the day. Now, I've been telling our community that I've been thinking that gold is going to start to make a move. I've been saying this for quite some time. And the reason is, is that everything goes in cycles.  So right now, gold had been up and recently has come down and gold stocks had been up and have recently over the last few months come down. And I believe that that was signaling a buying opportunity. Well, about a month ago, I started saying to our club members that I felt like gold was gonna start making comeback and that I felt like we couldn't see gold stay down forever. That was my opinion. And obviously we're starting to see that already with companies like Graycliffe that are now at 73 cents and are starting to make a move 74 cents now and starting to make a move, right? Now, why are they making a move? Because it's a cycle and the cycle of investing is when something is high people are selling and when something is low people are buying, that's it. And then everywhere in between is just what traders are playing with in between. That's it. What we like to focus on here at Rich TD Live is we like to get into stocks when they're down and then we like to sell them when they're overhyped and when everyone's talking about how much they're up on their stock that is our signal to sell. When you're jumping in a cab and your taxi cab driver is talking about your picks that you're buying, you know that's the time to sell because that's when everybody's buying and that's the rich system. We wanna buy when things are down, when nobody knows and we wanna sell when they're high when everybody's talking about it, okay? So you can clearly see that Graycliffe expiration is gaining steam and is climbing and is up. Surprise, surprise. Now, let's take a look at this other article here. So this is another article that I saw here and I read about Graycliffe expiration. As you could see, this was dated yesterday. Graycliffe expiration intersects near surface mineralization grading 8.59 grams a ton of gold over 5.5 meters. So this is the news yesterday. Graycliffe expiration is pleased to announce the results of the final three drill holes from the 2020 phase one expiration core drilling program. On the company Shakespeare Gold Project, located in the prolific Canadian Shield near Sudbury, Ontario. Graycliffe has commenced phase two drilling at Shakespeare and expects to provide additional assay results later in Q2 2021. So let's talk about the core drilling highlights. So the drill hole J-7-20 intersected strong near surface mineralization of 8.59 grams a ton of gold over 5.5 meters, including 43.60 grams a ton of gold over 1.0 meters starting at 68.5 meters downhole. Drill hole J-6-20 intersected near surface gold mineralization and extended the mineralized area identified in drill hole J-1-20 to the northeast of the historical Miller shaft and a number three at it. This is the table one significant intercepts for holes J-6-20 and J-7-20. So you can see the drill holes.  We extended the current mineralization zone at depth and a long strike and we have identified a parallel zone in the vicinity of the historic Miller shaft above the number three at it. We believe that the following phase two and three of this initial drill program in 2021 we will have a much better idea of the structural and geological controls affecting the gold mineralization commented James McIntosh, president and CEO. So this is the plan map of the 2014 and 2020 drilling on the Shakespeare project. And you can see the historical results, new results. So you can see some very exciting things happening here with Greycliff expiration. If you're a miner, this has got to be on your watch list. This has got to be on your radar. This is huge news and miners are always looking for drilling as a catalyst. Now let's talk a little bit about the qualified person Bruce Durham who is the geologist is a qualified person as that term is identified by Canadian regulatory guidelines under NI 43 101 which is what you need in order to drill and has read and approve the technical information contained in this press release. All information other than the results of the two new drill holes are historical in nature and while deemed relevant should not be relied upon. So they are focused on these new holes about Greycliff expiration. Greycliff expiration is a mineral expiration company focused on its 847 hectares of prospective ground located roughly 80 kilometers west of Sudbury on the prolific Canadian Shield. Company Shakespeare project consists of 39 claims on the property associated with historic Shakespeare goldmine which are 1903 to 1907. So that was the news and you can see the stock is responding in kind so far. This is their website. I wonder if they have any news today. Let's see. Don't see any news today yet. So that must have been the news. Let's see TMX money. See if they have any news today. G-R-A-Y, Greycliff exploration. There we go. And scroll down to see if they have any news. So take a look at this, this nuts. Look at the market cap. A 12 million market cap, that's a baby market cap but look at the shares listed out. This is one of the most tightly held stocks I've seen with only 18 million shares listed issued and outstanding. Absolutely phenomenal, tight, tight, tight share structure. I love tight float stocks. Absolutely love tight float stocks. So yeah, so that was the news that broke yesterday. The stock is responding in kind. I'll be keeping an eye on it. You should as well. Love to know what you guys think about this news. What do you guys think about Greycliff exploration? And there it goes folks. Now it's 77 cents up 8.45%. Congratulations to all investors that got in early and the symbol in America, G-R-Y-C-F. There you go. Hope you liked this pick. Let me know what you guys think. Did you get in? Do you like this? Are you holding this? Are you interested in this? So far so good for Greycliff exploration. This is your boy, Rich from Rich to be live and bringing the winners and we bring them to you first. Just wanted to let you know why I thought that Greycliff could go up. Obviously they're up. Obviously I'm not the only one thinking this. Love to know what you guys think. Put on your watches, put on your radar. If you get in for the win, let me know if you're ready in and you're winning. Let me know if you're thinking about it and you want to buy in a dip. Let me know what you're thinking. Is your boy, Rich from Rich to be live with Greycliff exploration? Symbol, G-R-A-Y in Canada, G-R-Y-C-F in America and G-E-O in Frankfurt, Germany. Have a nice day. We'll talk to you soon. Peace.


What's going on guys welcome back to the channel Critical Overlord here So this will be my spoiler for you for Pretty Little Liars Original Sin season one as spoiler freeze I can help it only for the first five episodes because that's all I've seen thus far the series is going to debut this week on HBO Max the embargo is lifted so I can talk about it So Pretty Little Liars Original Sin is being brought to us by Roberto Cicasa Who we know is known for Riverdale and its Sabrina spin-off as well over on the CW the series revolves around this new series Pretty Little Liars Original Sin revolves around five new liars a new generation of liars set in a nearby town Away from Rosewood. It's a town named Millwood and the series is following again five friends named Imogen who was played by Bailey Madison Noah who was played by Mia Rufico Tabby played by Chandler Kenny Mini played by Malia Piles and Farron played by Zarya now similar to the original show I will say that the girls again find themselves targeted by an unknown assailant or individual named a who was targeting them with Threats and text messages because of something their mothers did over two decks. They go regarding a girl named Angela waters Now as a fan of the original show I'm not going to say that the pilot for this series surpassed the epic pilot we had in 2010 might just be nostalgia However based on the five episodes I've watched so far I am hooked on this mystery and I do find it to be very gripping a is definitely more aggressive this Time around since being on HBO Max allows them to push the envelope and you are gonna have of course some very graphic moments Thinking of two kills in specific one person gets their throat slit, and I think the other one is strangled With it with a shower curtain So again a is definitely more aggressive, but I do miss the black hoodie I do miss that. Hopefully that's something that'll be introduced later on But really honestly, I don't care. I do prefer the black hoodie look But the look of a in this series isn't really that big of a issue for me Answers are also being given. I would say with almost every new episode thus far that I've seen and I know OG fans will appreciate that because You got tired of like me some of you I know got tired definitely of that 20 episode format where it was just nothing but filler and then many episodes where It's just nothing happening and then they save all the answers for their seasons finale or mid-season I like bro, what are you doing and it's nothing is getting breathing room either because it's just so So jam-packed but this show is actually giving you a piece of the puzzle each new episode I feel like the series is also riddled with slasher film references and Certain scenes actually pay homage to a two iconic moments from those slasher films The five girls are all very likable Sara Shepard's novels for those who read the novels Know that the series like the original show is based off of her novels are pretty little liars Sara Shepard's novels are more than recognized here as well Mallory Bechtel actually stars as a set of identical twin sisters named Karen and Kelly Karen is the resident mean girl. So she's our Allison Kelly is the more nice one Which again is a clear reference to both Courtney and Allison which I can admit the OG show handled the twin concept terribly We know that finally was introduced in season 6 and season 7. I think it was handled horribly giving the storyline pass We went down so Before I get into some other positives I do think the pacing and dialogue are the weakest aspect so far a lot of scenes Seem to not seem to not get room to breathe before cutting to the next one is Specific scene. I'm thinking of just to give an example involves imaging hiding from a and it's completely squandered in the sense That when it could have been used to build a lot of tension like the scene Starts it's getting your heart racing and it's looking like it's gonna pick up some momentum in the tension It's about to build then it's cut short is like bro. Why the dialogue also isn't completely awful But I found it cringy on several occasions Tabby who is one of the liar. She's my favorite liar because she's a horror fanatic and she loves all these Recent horror films and a lot of horror films from that from that past. She makes a lot of cringy dialogue references to them Also at times. It's not that it's cringy because she's doing it. It's the amount of times it happens So Tabby again is unfortunately given dialogue that is convincing me someone desperately wants to portray This is how teens are and horror fans are and they themselves aren't a teen or even possibly a horror fan Like they're trying very hard to convey to you teenagers are all like this or something And they themselves haven't been a teen for quite a while It just seems like desperation of trying to depict an average teenager It's filled with all these buzzwords the dialogue and she even has a moment where she confronts someone where she just Completely spewed out this what I'll call buzzword vomit. It was just cringe Aside from that each liar has a personal struggle. They are dealing with as well Imaging is pregnant. No has some legal issues Tabby has some Has some workplace issues Farron faces racism and many seems like she's obsessed with the internet while also dealing with a recent loss So you can already see the similarities between the og showing this new slasher relaunch set within the same world Performance wise I say everyone is doing a solid job Bailey Madison is the one who actually is very is it is impressing me the most here with her performance Imaging from the way she's delivering her lines and just all the things she was showcasing to me aside of her I can admit I've never seen and this is coming from someone who's watched her ever since she was a little girl Mallory Beck tell is incredible as well Karen and Kelly the switch between those two identical sisters is captured wonderfully Thanks to the fact that she is effectively portraying that these are two different girls All in all exploring a darker side of PLL has me more than satisfied and I'm hooked on the series so far My only hope is that it lays off the buzzword vomit and improves the pacing Honestly, there's even a chase scene where I'm like is that all it like the chase scene could have been longer And I know a lot of you horror fans who watch my channel love a good chase scene Original sin again from the five episodes I've seen is a solid relaunch of this universe and it has references to the og show as well So to get to get more specific there a certain act in a car Definitely seemed like a nod to the pilot episode in which we saw Byron and Meredith hooking up So the school parties with pleasing visual aesthetics are there and these good costume designs Although I will say the og did it best So far this show is an improvement in regards to its current handling of the mystery The twin narrative especially not dragging it out and introducing it later on in the show after teasing it for multiple seasons prior Going in a darker direction and providing the right amount of romance drama and terror It just lacks in the dialogue department and getting in the pacing It may be a bit some of the camerawork and some of the sets maybe also I would say the og show is superior there too All in all though still most people again came for the mystery and original sin doesn't put its mystery in the background Like the original show did to become a soap opera about girls and their relationships Then saving all the answers for a series finale or a season finale. I've thoroughly enjoyed what I've seen so far I can't wait to see how the season ends I hope we get season two and Hopefully this doesn't go down the path that I know many people are expecting to go down for those of you who are familiar with How Riverdale is turned out in the crossover with Sabrina and all these other things Hopefully it doesn't go down that path Hopefully it's something that can remain consistent because it only thing it has to do to beat out the original I feel the strongest thing many people agree is be consistent and be coherent That's all PLL fans want and give us a gripping mystery But let me know what you guys think about all this down in the comment section below if you have an area course Make sure you subscribe turn on post a kitchen in this video in the description I'll have links to all my social media accounts on Facebook Twitter and Instagram You can message me there of course to let me know is any movies news or reviews you like me to cover in the future And with all that in mind guys, I will see you in the next video


Staying with volleyball Bemidji hosting Duluth East on senior night early in set one Lexi Wade stuffs daisy hoops at the net For the block and the point then she delivers the monster spike for the kill as Bemidji takes the early four-point lead Later in the set it's senior Ciri Bardwell's turn delivering the kill off the blockers for the point And then Wade continued to do her thing delivering another kill off the set from Addie Colligan Jax takes that one twenty five twelve. They'd win the next two and shut out Duluth East three zero If you've enjoyed this segment of Lakeland news, please consider making a tax deductible contribution to Lakeland public television


What's up everybody, Jason here for JaspysCaseBricks.com. We just sold out the team random for picketing number one of 21-22 Panini Contenders Optic Basketball. This features the Pistons, Raptors, Cavs, and more guys, so again it's a high risk but a very high reward. You got a 1-9 shot to claim the top prize which the Pistons were a $500 team. Now the Raptors are $300, Cavs 280, Lakers over $160, I think they're like $180. Now the bottom teams down here of course a little under the spot prize but you guys are still going to get a team and you never know guys, could be a huge hit for those teams. So basically we're just going to randomize the nine customer names and then we're going to match up with the list. So whatever you match up with is what you get. So let's roll the dice and it's a 4-1-5 times, good luck, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5th and final time we go 5, boom, 5 times, 4-1-5, Brian Wofford at the top, Dunham Matthew, last spot mojo. There you go, 5 times and let's see how I played out here for everybody in the break. Regardless, you still have a spot. Brian congratulations, you got the Pistons, Mark with the Raptors, Collin with the Cavs, Brian with the Lakers, Collin with the Knicks, Matthew with the Heat, Edward with the Blazers, Mark with the Wizards, and Matthew with the Utah Jazz. So I appreciate it folks. Coming up next guys is the break itself, JaskiesKageBreaks.com.


Merry Christmas everyone. My name is Cynthia Lee Sinclair. I am the host of Finding Respect in the Chaos here on Think Tech live every other Friday at 3 p.m. It is a safe place for survivors of abuse to come and tell their stories and a place for advocates to come and share important resources. At Christmas time, we are called upon to be generous in spirit. But what does that mean exactly? Does it mean that if you drop a few coins in the red buckets where you hear the bell ringing, you are covered for the season? Well, it is a good thing to donate to that great cause, but generosity of the spirit is something much deeper than that. When we make a hot meal for a homeless family and deliver it with a few small gifts for the kids, that is generosity of the spirit. Making a batch of cookies for the older woman who lives alone in your building, you will make her day. That is generosity of the spirit. Generosity of the spirit is to go out of your way to be kind to someone, to reach out of your comfort zone and spread love and joy to everyone around you. Here in Hawaii, we live aloha every day. We smile when we pass someone. You rarely hear a horn honk while you're on the road. Generosity of spirit is like the aloha spirit times 10. Hawaii is proud to share the aloha spirit every day, so we have plenty of practice. Christmas is a time when being generous of spirit can touch someone's life like no other time of the year. All of us here at Think Tech wish you a bountiful Christmas season, filled with love and laughter. I'm Cynthia Lee Sinclair, wishing you a melikikimaka and a haoli makahiki ho.