Hello friends, this is Dheeraj welcoming you again on another problem solving video. So this question was asked by one of our students. So let us discuss about this question and try to learn some light. So let us first read the question. So you can see there's a satellite of mass m which is launched vertically upward with velocity u from the surface of the earth. After it reaches the height of r, the height is measured from the surface. Always remember that. Now this height is also the radius of the earth. After reaching it ejects a rocket of mass m by 10. And immediately after it, the satellite starts moving in a circular orbit. So we need to find out the kinetic energy of the rocket. So you know, if you do a lot of problem solving yourself, you realize that this particular question will probably take up your at least four to five minutes. So in case you're writing a J main exam and this kind of question comes up in during your first, let us say first 15 or 20 minutes. So I would advise you to mark this question to solve it later.  All right. So but right now we are here to learn the concept. So let us proceed. So let us say this is the earth. OK, now there's a rocket of mass m that is launched vertically from here. OK, so let us say it is launched like that with a velocity of u. And once it reaches a radius r, so I'll take a lot of time to explain. All right, so that we can get it properly. So after let us say it reaches a height r from the surface of the earth, where r is a radius of the earth also. After reaching here, this mass m splits into two parts. What happens? It ejects a rocket of mass m by 10. OK, so remaining mass of the satellite becomes 9 m by 10. And then satellite starts moving in a circular orbit. So right now when it is here, when it is about to eject the rocket, it was going radially outwards. Isn't it? And immediately after, let us say when it ejects a rocket, let us say it ejects a rocket like this. I'll put a point here. Let us say this small red dot is a rocket. This rocket has been ejected. Now you can see the direction of ejection. It cannot be ejected in, let's say horizontal or vertical direction. The reason is the satellite has to gain a tangential velocity. Let us say the satellite's velocity just after the ejection of the rocket is V. Now, can it have a radial component, my dear friends? Of course not. If there is a radial component, the satellite will keep going away, right? But it has to immediately start revolving in a circle. So that's why immediately after the ejection of the rocket, the satellite's radial component of the velocity or you can say the component of velocity in the y direction where this is the y direction and this is the x direction. So immediately after the ejection of the rocket, the satellite's y direction momentum becomes zero, momentum or velocity. Now this gives us a good amount of hint here. So what you have to do is, since there is a splitting of mass happening here and the rocket is getting ejected, you can definitely conserve momentum along both x as well as y direction. All right? So let us do one thing, the rocket which is getting ejected, we will assume its velocity along the x-axis and along the y-axis. We are basically taking the components of the velocity. So the rocket's velocity along the y-axis, let us say it is Vy and the rocket's velocity along the x-axis is let us say Vx. All right? So keep noticing all these terms that we are using. V is the velocity of the satellite after the rocket has ejected and the mass of the satellite has become 9m by 10 because m by 10 is the mass of the rocket itself. All right? So let us proceed from here till the point the rocket is getting ejected. I can conserve the energy. Right? So I can say u1 plus k1 is equal to u2 plus k2. This is the conservation of mechanical energy equation, fine? So I am going to take mass of the earth as m, which they want you to take. So that is why they are given it. And g is the gravitational constant, r is also given, my dear friends, all right? So in this equation, we will just have to substitute u1 is what? Minus of gm into small m by r, this is point number 1, all right? And this is point number 2. Point number 2 is just before the ejection of the rocket, fine? This plus kinetic energy, half m into u2. That is equal to potential g at point number 2, which is minus of gm into m divided by 2r. So rocket just about to come out, plus k2, half m into, let us say, velocity is v1 for the rocket when, sorry, for the satellite when the rocket just about to come out of the velocity of the satellite is v1, all right? So you are on the right track, don't worry. So this is the velocity in which direction along the y direction for the satellite just before the rocket is about to eject out of it. Now what we will do? We will conserve the momentum along the x-axis and along the y-axis. So conservation of linear momentum, my dear friends, we have to use along the x-axis. How will I use it? I will write along the x-axis, there was no momentum initially for the satellite, isn't it? That is equal to m by 10 into velocity of the satellite vx minus, sorry, velocity of the rocket vx minus 9m by 10, which is the remaining satellite's mass, that into v, fine? So this is the conservation of linear momentum along the x-axis. Now the equation along the y-axis, along the y-axis, you will see that immediately after the ejection of the rocket, the remaining portion of the satellite should not have any velocity on the y-axis because it has to move in a circle. So entire velocity have to be tangential. I hope you are getting my point here. So along the y-axis, initial momentum is m into v1, which is nothing but m into root over u square minus gm by r. This is your momentum of the satellite along with the rocket before rocket came out. That should be equal to the final momentum, right? So the rocket's final momentum along the y-axis is m by 10 vy and the remaining portion of the satellite does not have any momentum along the y-axis as immediately after it starts revolving in a circle. So these are the two equations, fine? So from here, you can, from the first equation, you will get the value of vx, vx is equal to 9 times v. Now you can basically arrange the term in any which way. It entirely depends upon what the question is asking, right? The question is asking kinetic energy of the rocket and what is the kinetic energy of the rocket? The kinetic energy of the rocket is nothing but half mass of the rocket, which is m by 10 into vx square plus vy square, right? So this bracket term is a total velocity square of the rocket. So that is what we have to find out. So we have found out vx. Now we'll be finding vy. So vy is equal to 10 times root over u square minus gm by r, right? So you have vx and vy. But the problem is, the problem is that the vx is given in terms of an unknown quantity v. So do we know v? So if you think carefully, you will understand that the fact that the satellite is revolving at a distance of 2r, its velocity is automatically fixed. It has to have certain tangential velocity. So let us find out how we can proceed from here on. So whenever something is moving in a server orbit, we tend to write force towards the center is equal to mv square by r, right? So I hope all of that you remember. So gm into mass of the rocket, which is m by 10 divided by the distance square, which is 2r square, that should be equal to m by 10 into v square divided by radius. So this is nothing but force towards the center is equal to mv square by r. You can probably use some direct expressions also. But don't you worry if you know the basics. I think I have written small m in terms of capital M. So I will replace it. This is capital M. So small m by 10 goes away. One of the 2r is also gone. So from here, you will get v is equal to root over gm by 2r. And you can get vx is equal to 9 times v, which is 9 times root over gm by 2r. So my dear friends, here is your second equation. Now you have now vy and vx, the kinetic energy of the rocket, which is asked is simply equal to half m by 10 into, let me write over here, into vx square plus vy square. Now although we have solved the question just for the clarity of the concepts. But if such kind of question, let's say you get in J main, you need to immediately identify that this question could eat up a lot of your time. So you need to skip it as soon as possible. And I'm not saying that you should skip it and don't come back at the end in case you have time left or whatever simple or easy questions you might have been getting. If you have solved all of them, then you can definitely come back to this question and solve. All right. So thanks for watching the video. I hope you have learned something today. Bye bye.


Your case is going to court. Did you know that if you apply for social security disability benefits There's a big chance that your case is going to end up in front of a federal administrative law judge That's right social security denies the vast majority of their cases anywhere from 65 to 70 percent My name is Tony Vieira I'm an attorney with 22 years of social security experience and I'm here to share with you three things just three quick things That if you do this will greatly improve your chances of winning your court case number one Remember, it's your responsibility to keep your medical record up to date Early on in that social security process social security requested the records for you However, now that you're going to court it is up to you to make sure that the judge has all the information He or she requires to know how you've been doing number two get statements of support from family friends and your doctors This is real important You are trying to create for this judge an accurate picture of the kind of person you are and from your doctors It's important not just to confirm what's wrong with you and what your diagnosis is But exactly how it affects you and how it limits you at work number three talk to an experienced Lawyer your case is going to go to court You're going to want to have an attorney to speak with to make sure that you have everything you need And you don't just have to take my word for it The social security administration and federal government studies show that people that talk to lawyers and have Representation are up to three times as likely to get approved as someone without an attorney If you need help with your disability claim or if you know someone that does Please feel free to give us a call and feel free to share this video. Thanks


Over the last 10 years, Missillon Flamenca has grown with the goal to create a venue for dancers, musicians, and aficionados of Flamenco to share their love of this art with the Bay Area community. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Missillon Flamenca.


Welcome to Toffy TV. Listen, there was a fantastic article last week on the athletic about Kieran Dahl and Jel Virginia on loan at Derby and Reading respectfully. Now, it's probably gone under the radar considering there's a lot of stuff going on at Evan at the moment, but we thought we'd have a little chat about it and the whole loan situation at Evan and the under 23s as well. Evan checked out the athletics. Fantastic. Brilliant time to get it as well, just in time. Little Christmas stocking fill it. You get 30 days free trial and you get 50% off as well. Some cracking, cracking jainless on it. Some of the best in the world. We've got Paddy Boyland and Greg O'Keefe looking after the evidence stuff. They just started a new podcast as well called Glad Tidings. Gladys in Gladys Street to check out as well. They have really good stories all the time on their proper, proper evidence stories. Not click baity, not pop-upy nonsense, proper stories. The link is in the description if you want to check that out. Listen, Christmas coming. You can get the free trial, give it to someone for Christmas and then pay for it in January. They don't know, do they? They have no idea. You know what I'm saying? All the money you spend in December, you could pay for this Christmas in January. Kieran Dahl, he's gone a bit stale at the Derby County, not playing games or football for them. It's just not really happening for him. It never really happened before it's for him. Never really happened the Chief of the United for him and now it's not happening at Derby County. What does he do? Where does he go? Must have come and done Almanita. Kieran Dahl. Exactly. He's not getting in three different managers. To be fair he started for us really well. I think he ended up with nine or ten goals. When he changed the manager in about March and that was the end of him. He was out there then. He came back and was out editing for the first part of last season, played in the Carabao Cup in Southampton. He went around earlier, didn't he? He was all right. Went to Chef United in January, done all right. Was in and out. Played him centre mid, left wing back. Looked like they might keep him for a while for this year, but decided against it. He went off to Derby before pre-season. He went off to America to begin the pre-season there. Philip Coghw was very enthused with him when he got him. He turned a couple of clubs down to go there. He got in the team at the start. He was in the team early on. He hasn't played a game now for him since the end of October. He played it under 23 games about two weeks ago. He's been on the bench regularly, but he doesn't know where to get on. It's just feeling like he's lost really. What does he do? It's that crucial time, isn't it, when you're going from being a young, up-and-coming player to being a player who needs to be playing football every single week. Having that consistency. I think one of the big problems is his position. What is he? Gone are the days where you can have a great left foot and smash goals in like Kevin Sheedy. It's all about systems and pressing and where you are in a formation. It's not 4-4-2 anymore. It's interesting systems that rely on people to do their particular jobs to make it work. I don't know if he fits in that, whether you can just smash one in every now and again. When he was in the under-23s, because that's what he used to do in the under-23s, he'd do nothing and then he'd smash one in. I don't know if there's a place in the editing team that wants to come back here, because I don't understand just the lies on that. But now it's not even to happen for him. What's going to confuse the matter even more is Darby County are going to have Wayne Rooney playing for them in about a month's time. He's going to be coming to the club. But it'd be interesting what happens in the meantime, whether Wayne Rooney's influence can maybe affect here and that, maybe he can speak to the connection from Everton and say to him, listen, this is what you need to do if you want to be. Maybe the message isn't getting through from Koku. Maybe he's looked at him and gone, you're not good enough and just gone. I don't want to deal with you. You're not one of my players. You can just sit on the bench. I've been paining for you, so sound. Maybe something like Wayne Rooney coming in could have that influence where he listens. Maybe. I mean, listen, I remember Rooney's first game for Everton in Gormare here and we were in here watching it. He smashed one in from 25 yards and then Dahl scored and I had to be worthy. And then scored another cracker against 20. Then we beat them three and Rooney was on the pitch then as well. So he trained with Wayne Rooney and he'll know each other from that time. The issue is Wayne can play number 10 on the ground or a centre forward. So it could go two ways with him. You'd like to think Wayne would grab hold of him and give him some advice and maybe be the buffer between him and Koku. I imagine Koku's a straight up and Dutch fella because they all seem to be. So maybe it's just like that to Dahl. You're not doing enough at the moment, which is why you're not in. Ciaran Dahl is one of those players that maybe he's going to have to redefine what he is as a footballer. You know, Guilfee was saying it now. The game has moved on a bit now in the last couple of years that you have to do more than just wait for those special moments. When we've seen Dahl, it's been on the periphery against and then he will kill one in the top corner. You go, wow, what a goal, but you forget that the other 88 minutes, he was walking around the pitch uninterested. So maybe he's going to have to get himself a position that he's involved in the game more. And now that we've been, I mean, Michael should have tried him in the centre of the midfield last season and at the Carabao Cup. I don't think he's quite good enough to play in there. And now England have used him as a six to spread a ball about. And he done all right. So, you know, he does play a lot for the 21s or he has played a lot for the 21s. But I don't know. I really don't know what you would do with him. I think talent wise, he's a Premier League footballer. He's got that ability in that left foot. Brilliant. But he's got nothing else at the moment suggesting that he's going to make it in the Premier League. I think you're right about finding the position, getting a position and stick to a position. I don't think he can play centre midfield. I don't think he's got the engine for it. I think maybe something like something off the right he could play, you know, coming in on that left foot could help if it was in the right system. But for me, he's got to go somewhere now. And it might be permanent where whoever gets older, gets older for the right reasons. The one and we see John Joe over in Chelsea, you know, he was taking it to do a job. But for them, not for us, for them, I mean, benefit to us, but for them. And I think it's the same with Keir and Dahl. Someone's got to take him and, you know, if it's on a permanent, it might be better because he's got some, then he maybe feels like he belongs somewhere. And the money, you know, you can't miss about lower than in the league. You've got to buy, when you buy a player, you've got to play him. You haven't got the money to start going where we've paid a couple of million quid for you, but you're not doing well, so go and sit over there. You've got to play them through that. And I think it's very easy when you've got someone on loan and you think, well, I'm just developing them for somebody else. To just say, yeah, go and sit over there. We don't... The easiest drop, I think. Yeah, they're the first ones. So I honestly think his everything career is over at this stage. Right now, you'd have to go somewhere to turn it down. I think you'd have to go somewhere for a couple of years for a start and then never address the situation because the way they've done the loan so far is, you know, forest, change the manager goes out. Sheffield is united. They liked them. They played them in some games when they were getting to the tough end of the season, but the minute they got promoted, it was like, thanks, but no thanks. We need a core set of players who are going to do what we need. And I think that was very telling, I think. Sheffield is united. They didn't take him on loan for the Premier League because everyone was thinking, ah, the Premier League don't need this and that. And their manager was like, no, no, I need players that I can count on. And then Dabi's, as you said, the same. It's great to get him in pre-season. Oh, it's great. And then when it starts getting a little bit tough, what he got, and it just seems like he hasn't got enough. I think the fear for him is he falls between the cracks of not knowing what he is. And that's a worry to us. I think you've got to identify a position, stick to it. You've got to work hard with the kid himself. He's had it easy. I imagine coming through the academy, I think, I've probably been like, oh, this kid can score for me after all. I'm a water player and he can ghost it on the pitch. We know what kids football is like. We've seen enough of it. And then when people are relying on you every week on the money, people are paying the money to watch it on the terraces if you're not doing it quickly on the team. And he's got to get that hunger from somewhere that he's got to do a bit more. Otherwise, he's got to end up nowhere. And on top of that, we've got to Aberdynia at Reading, who, you know, Reading took him with the decent financial thing from Everton to encourage to play him. And they were told he wasn't going to be buying anyone, really, so it sounded good he was going to play him then. I think it's a different one, isn't it? It's a different case, this one, because a goalkeeper, obviously, is a different thing. Reading took him, and for us, we've probably been thinking, brilliant. A year in the championship playing, but they've looked at it and said, we need more than this. They went out and bought a goalkeeper, and now we find himself either on the bench or not involved at all. He's got to be playing. He has made mistakes, and what they're probably saying is, why has he made mistakes for us? Why are we getting this player now and Evan will get the benefit later? I just think it's maybe it's the wrong fit and Evan haven't been sold something that's not real. Maybe it was said, listen, we haven't got the money to go and buy another goalkeeper. We're going to buy this, this and this. I think Virginia, he's clearly still got a future of Evan. I think that maybe he just needs to go and find football somewhere, and it doesn't matter where, because saving shots is saving shots. Get the basics right, get your kicking right, get all those things you need in modern football. But go down, like Jordan Pickford did, go down to the lower leagues and play for a year solid.  Just learn to play being a goalkeeper, what it means. Men's football. The problem is that at Redding, he made that mistake, or he makes a mistake in a cup game or whatever, and then he's out the team, and he can't ratify that. It's like maybe in that division you make that mistake and you go, you know what? OK, get that out my head, and away we go, and next week the same. And start becoming a professional footballer, because probably all these kids is, they're pampered, and they play in the under-23s, and it's great, and you win a couple of trophies in its boss. But there's no real jeopardy for them, because they're playing in like a safe environment, and then they step up to the men's league, and then they become real consequences to their actions, whether for them, or whether for the team, or whether for the supporters. It becomes real. And I think they've got a lane to deal with that mentally. Yeah, it's a massive side of the game. That's right, you go and play where you can. Pickford played in every division. He's still making mistakes. At the end of the day, goalkeepers are goalkeepers. They make a mistake, invariably, it's a goal, and everyone picks up on it, don't they?  Strike him, this is a goal, someone else can score. If you goalie, let go through his arms, it's a goal, not much you can do.  For him, he made an error against Hull early on in the league, slipped through his hands, and it went in. He was out the team. He put him back in for the game against Wolves. He let one from 25 yards go through his grass, or bounce off him and go in. Now he played 90 minutes, I think, and penalties in that. So he drew one, won that night, went out on penalties. So he's played the whole game, and he's let one in, he's made other good saves, but people are just looking back going, like that one through his arm. And if he had had a league game on the set, he could have got that out, if people had gone and played well. You're right, he's in, he's out, he's in, he's out. So even if he went to, I don't know, even a league two-side or whatever, if he struggled with, like maybe, you know, having got the money to spend and all whatever. If they've only got a small pot, and they're like, well, we need a centre forward, we need a goalie, but we'll buy a centre forward and we'll loan a goalie in. Things like that, you will find that. He needs games is what he needs to develop, but then, you know, on the back, I'd have to hold things a bit messed up, isn't it? You've seen it, the 21s. The other night. The 21s were the 23s, isn't it? Playing in the leasing.com trophy against Fleetwood. Obviously they've got to be 4-0, but three very late goals, which probably comes down to fitness levels. But there's some kids in the under-23s. They shouldn't be having a football club. And I mean that for them. There's kids who are like, and we said this on other videos, part of it is this thing of being like an under-23 player and like someone thinking you're a footballer.  And that's all, but they weren't like, do you know what I mean? They weren't like going round town, going, I play for Evan. You were a resie. You know, it's great you were there at the club, but you know what I mean? Now it's almost like, it seemed like David Henin when he was at the club, and he was like, you think he was Ronaldo the way he acted on like Instagram and all that kind of thing. And I think there's too much. I'm not saying that happens. Because you put the branding, you slap the branding on it, primarily to. And you're playing a good son, you're playing at these boss-taining grounds. It somehow becomes more than it actually is, and you're not actually grounding them. You're almost saying to them, this is a level. And you know, it's nice that we won the trophies and all that, but that shouldn't be the bar. The bar should be, are you getting a chance to get in the first team? And very few have. You know, Benninga Bee's been on the bench, ironically, he got injured this week. Benninga Bee's been on the bench recently. Lewis Gibson has seen as the fourth centre back, although he's never been on the bench, played pre-season. Tom's in the team, Gordon's now on the bench, but there's not. We've paid a lot of money for a lot of players in the last two, three years at both levels. And I don't mind, right, if you're bringing under twenty-three's in, but when you're letting them go for nothing, you haven't got a plan for them. I mean, listen, I don't know how much control brands is trying to take back or trying to get everything in place, but it feels like it's not getting done right at the moment. You're seeing kids who play for Liverpool's Academy leaving for millions of pounds, and your ars are leaving for free. So it's like, if that's an investment that you're putting money in, then at least weep something out of it at the end if they're not good enough, we just seem to let them go for free. Something we've definitely got to get better at, because it helps with everything, helps with FFP and everything with your academy making money in. What I really worry about with Everton's Academy is that we used to be seen as, we used to hoover up all the local kids. Because people would say, our academy is like the one. Liverpool, you'll never get a chance at Liverpool. But Klopp changed the money he came in. He brought that game and philosophy in of like, we make plays for the national team, for our team, but for other teams as well. Klopp looked at Liverpool and basically said, why isn't this place self-sufficient? Why am I basically losing money in the transfer market because you're doing all this with it? This place should be self-sufficient. No one likes to sell players, but you've got to be realistic about it. And I've heard this before, other academies at lower teams, they say, why have we got an academy when you've got 11 players on the pitch for one player who might break through? It doesn't make any sense. And it's the same with Evan. You might have two players in that under-23s who might or might not make it. And the other nine in the team are just basically in there for him. So surely it should be, well if I'm paying money for him, then I should be getting some money for him. And then we're leasing them at the right time and the site keeps going, you bring them in if they're not good enough, you get something out. Wherever you've put into that player financially, you've got to be getting back. Yeah, definitely. I mean, we've got too many. When you look at our 23s, there's too many with 21 and 22. Nathan Broder is on loan, he's 22. You know, we don't know, I appreciate him, but he's not going to get an evidence face. Not good enough. You can't compare him to Bernard and people like that. And yet, if he'd gone on loan maybe last year or left the club at last year, he could be going the Euros with Wales this year. Because there's a lot of Welsh players and because the way Giggs has done things, he's put young players and he could be at a championship team and doing really, really well. I know he's a baiting, but he could be at a championship team doing really well and be on the cusp of that. Well, I mean, he might still get in because he's done all right. I think he said he was in a group of Welsh under 21s and he was the only one who had another full debut. And the reason why is because those other lads had played for the team, whether it be in the championship or not.  And we're not helping their careers. We're not helping their careers. They shouldn't come back. And I hope that no one wants to take them. We need to be getting them out of the door quickly because our 21s, 23s, should be a ground for, you know, developing 80s. People like Alice Sims take in the other night. Now, I don't know whether he's good enough or he's not good enough forever. I don't know what he's going to be. He's a kid, right? But he was subred the other night.   We'll try to go anyway and people know what he can do. So Alice Sims, you know, so it's things like that. And we've seen that in other with other people as well. So I just think we need a whole change of philosophy and it's 18, 19. And then when you're 19, it's like, can we get you alone? Are you good enough? Can we get you alone? And if not, you know, but we've seen Karen Phillips, who signed a contract in the summer professional contract. He's now on trial at Sheffield United. So he signed in the summer. It's November and they're trying to move them on. So if we are making quick decisions, then hopefully that's the beginning of it. We need to make it. We'll wait and see what happens. We'll wait and see. But obviously, Karen Dahl's definitely one for me that shouldn't be an Everton player anymore because I just think if he hasn't made it by now, he's not going to make it in our first team. So we have to be more ruthless, I think, on all these kids. A lot more sell them and put a buy back in. Yeah. Maybe it does well. We did that with plays in the summer. So why not? We'll see what happens. We'll see what happens. Listen, if you want to read this article that's in the athletic, make sure you check that out. Don't forget you get a 30 day free trial and it's 50% off. If you click the link in the description. Thank you for watching Toffy TV. See you later.


I get solicited for a lot of marketing opportunities and lists and things like that, and I don't respond to the majority of them, but this one caught my eye, so I thought I'd talk about it. Tom, we are presenting you with our annual edition of Managed Network Services, in which we will be presenting the top 10 managed network service companies of 2019. I should feel honored, right? I have been selected, George from Enterprise Networking Magazine offered me this opportunity because apparently, through some criteria not listed here, I was selected to be the top 10 list for Managed Network Service 2019. That sounds exciting, and before you pat me on the back, I don't get to be in the top 10 until we would like to provide reprint branding packages to Lawrence Technologies for $3,000. These benefits include rights to reproduction of the content, reprints published in the edition, which will be based on a telephonic interview, I like to use telephonic as a word with your CEO's senior management, Lawrence Technologies will also receive a certificate honor and the logo of top 10 managed network service providers of 2019, which can be utilized in your marketing activities. The article will be hosted on our website, hyperlinked to Lawrence Technology Services website, one full page advertisement, which can be utilized in upcoming edition of Enterprise Network Magazine within the next six months. I thought this was just kind of weird. If you want to interview me because you think I did something cool, awesome, or technology I've done, or things I've talked about, probably if you found me anywhere, it's from this YouTube channel. But I mean, to honor me, and then with a $3,000 offer of buying ad space on your magazine so I'll get in the top 10 list, doesn't make me really want to be in your magazine. Because if you can just buy your position into the magazine by throwing $3,000 at it, why? It suddenly doesn't carry much weight. And I know most consumers are assuming magazines are done with a traditional ad model of they find advertisers that would like to advertise in their magazine that supports the funds for the journalists to go out and do their research and figure out which companies they did something interesting readers want to read about. That's generally how magazines media works here in 2018 and has worked for quite a while in this business model. But there are companies, and apparently drag this on over here, Enterprise Networking being among them, where your top 10 list, I don't know what anymore is a top 10 list that is bought and paid for, or what is a actual, you know, interesting article you wrote because someone did something interesting supported by other ads. Like I said, I'm not trying to dog on a magazine or anything like that. I'm just kind of pointing out it's interesting to me that they offered it this way. And, you know, George sent this unsolicited email, therefore I don't mind sharing his name. He took the time to find me, so I'm taking the time to share it with you. And this is one of the things I want to make sure people think about, and I just I couldn't possibly give you an entire list of this, but, you know, how many magazines aren't all that valid. This is why it's so hard to find good reviews. And this is one of the reasons I really, you know, try hard on YouTube. And I'm not the only one I see a lot of people doing this. I like to give reviews a product because one, I wasn't paid to review the product. I'm talking about our real world usage of it. And, you know, this is because the magazine model, when they allow companies to sponsor them, and then they brag about how good the company is, you're like, well, your person that's sponsoring it is getting a brag thing there. Suddenly, you are no longer objective about your review of something. And I don't know what criteria is used to put me in such a big list. I'm by far not the biggest MSP out there. I feel as though we do a good job and I'm proud of my company. And we have very happy clients, but I don't know that we did anything so significant in the MSP space that would put me in a top 10 list. I'm certainly not the top 10 biggest by far. There are numerous ones right here in Michigan that are bigger than me. And maybe our customer service. But how would you objectively understand it? You'd have to interview all of my clients, which I don't have a list and no one's ever asked me for it. It just becomes very confusing and, you know, hey, cool. I like bragging rights in a magazine, but I don't want it to be there because I was just paid money to get on the top 10 list. I don't know. I'm just throwing it out there and I'm going to title this top 10 list enterprise magazine. And people to know if you see that top 10 list, it was because it was, well, at least my offer was $3,000. Maybe they vary the amount they charge per people. And because that's the first email sent on solicited, I don't feel as though I'm disclosing anything that wasn't just randomly emailed to me by George. However, he acquired my email address. Not that it's rocket science to figure out my email address. I didn't reach out to him. George reached out to me. So that's about it. Not really a rant video, but just kind of one of those eye-opening videos. It happens a lot in the industry. I've seen this before over the years. I've been in business where companies drop that hint. Well, if you want to buy a big ad space with us, we'll find a good article to write about you. I kind of like the more tradition model where it's actual journalism. They do research. They find something interesting that their user base would be interested in and they find brands that would want to target the same audience that would read said article. That's the more traditional media model and it becomes more subjective that way because once you start tying the person being interviewed to the person paying you, you're probably going to do nothing but say nice things about them, their product, or whatever you're talking about. All right, thanks. And one last thing. George sent this over. This is apparently a draft of a certificate I would receive if I had bought their package for marketing. George apparently couldn't be bothered to even pull the logo off my website or my anywhere. So they just kind of have this poorly-curned launch technology services probably some template that comes from the marketing and this was a PDF he attached and sent. Yeah, now I'm going to make this the thumbnail because this is kind of funny. I don't know, it doesn't look good. Look at the kerning on this. All right, thanks. If you would like to help the channel out in other ways, you can use our affiliate links below in the description or we have a link directly to our launch systems page where we have a list of different affiliate offers and it's very appreciated if you use any of those for signing up any of the services and many of them offer you discounts. If you want to head over to our forums, there'll be a link in the description for our forums, wherever they may be because we've been looking at different forum platforms but they'll always be relevantly linked right there. All right, once again, thanks. Leave some feedback and comments below on this video. If you loved it, if you hated it, I try to reply to everyone, the people who hate and the people who love them. So thank you very much and see you next time.


Hey everyone, this is another video write up for the challenge Sleepy for 70 points in the forensics category of TJCTF. Challenge prompt here is, I found this super suspicious transmission lying around on the floor. What could be in it? So we can copy this address, go ahead and download this file. It is a pcapng file. I'm just going to save it as a pcap file. And then we can open it up in Wireshark, take a look at it, see what we have to work with. So the gist of this is a FTP connection, like a client and server communication. Down at the very bottom, there is a certain amount of TLS v 1.2. So some encrypted communication that we aren't able particularly able to easily read. We just can't see those because they're encrypted packets. FTP is actually like a plain text protocol. So thankfully we can see a lot of these communications that are being sent. You can see them trying to log in and authenticate with a user and password. So if we wanted to, we could actually just follow the TCP stream and see this entire communication. It looks like, I'm not able to zoom in here, but so they log in, list files, move into a directory, list files again, and eventually download or retrieve a key.zip file. So I want to take a look at what that file is.  And you can see, okay, here they actually are retrieving it, running the command and the like port 20, the FTP data port and channel there, we can actually view this. And that is you can note with the PK file magic header at the very top. This is the zip archive that they're trying to download. Let's view it as raw. And then what I'm going to do is going to save it as key.zip. And once we have it, we should be able to just check out in that directory, unless do we have key.zip? Yes, we do. And it is a zip archive because we're able to extract it raw from Wireshark. So let's go ahead and unzip this. It looks like it ignored some parent directory notion. That's perfectly fine. It put a server key PEM file in this directory. So let's go ahead and check that out. CD user FTP files private, blah, blah, blah. And we have server key dot PEM. So this is a private key that we could use to decrypt that TLS communication or that SSL the encrypted packets in our Wireshark. So let's go ahead and try that. If I open Wireshark back up. What we can do is we can go ahead and create a new settings over in edit preferences. And we can open up the protocol section over on the left tab, move to SSL. And we can specify a log file that we want to use. Let's just call it like log.debug. And then let's edit the RSA list. For one thing, we want the IP address of what we're actually communicating with. So before I jump through this, I should probably write that down. In the TLS, we want the notion of the server. So that should be the 10142.03. Yes, I believe so. Let's actually write that down. So we've got it jotted 10142.0.3. Cool. And if I'm wrong, we can just switch out what that setting might be. Protocol SSL, debug log file log.txt, RSA keys list, add a new one for IP address here. Port is 443. We can see them communicating on that. Protocol is HTTP. Key file will browse for that. We can see we have it in this zip archive that we saved here. If we run okay, we can hit okay one more time. And okay, I must have hit the wrong IP address. Okay, I switched out the IP address. Sorry about that hiccup. Now the packets are much more visible. We can see them in surrounding these TLS packets actually making some HTTP requests like simple requests. We can see the decrypted SSL, which we can view if we particularly wanted to. We can follow the TCP stream. That is the handshake. Decrypted SSL looks like they just make a get request with Python requests. And they get this flag.jpg image. So looks like a lot of these are actually carrying some TLS data. So we start to make this request, but TLS will send it in other segmented packets. So you can see right up here, we have the HTTP response, okay, content type equals text plane, etc. So what I ended up doing, truth be told, was actually viewing each of these and like carving them out by hand. So follow SSL stream, actually just double clicking on it and selecting the decrypted SSL packets, we can copy this as a hex stream. And then what I'll do is I'll go ahead and put this in a sublime text file that we can work with. And note that that has HTTP content type, etc, etc file stuff in it. So we will have to cut some of that out because it's viewing it as text plane. But we'll convert it to a JPEG on our own. Once we compile all of these together, decrypted SSL copy as hex stream, just like that. Do it for the third packet here. decrypted SSL copy as hex stream. Okay, I'm sure there's a better and smarter way to do this. So if someone please do tell me, I would appreciate that in the comments or whatever JPEG header. I want to see what the start of this JPEG is. I think it's a file signatures, right? They start with FFD8 FFE0. So FFD8. Oh boy, I hit Ctrl F. Okay, found it just at the very top. So it looks like there are some new lines character here that we can remove. Let's go ahead and save these as something that we don't need. And let's put this as hex encoded.txt. And let's just use Python to actually decode these. So Python open hex encoded.txt, we can read that file. And then let's run just another one open something.jpeg, w and let's write the c decoded from hex. And now that that's done, we should have something.jpeg, which is a JPEG image, and we can view it. And we have the flag. Looks like it's a little cut up here. So I must have done something wrong. But the very top of it does give us the flag. TJCTF, wire shark or shark wire. I'm sure I did something wrong there. So I would appreciate again, the point of notice there. I did get this just fine when I ran through it on my own. But okay, when I have a camera rolling, it's like 1000 people are watching. So whatever, we've got the flag, we can write that down, we can submit it, we can mark this challenge as complete and we are done. Hey, I want to give a special shout out to the people that support me on Patreon. Thank you guys so much. $1 or more on Patreon will give you a special shout out just like this at the end of every video. $5 or more on Patreon will give you early access to everything and release on YouTube before it goes live. If you did like this video and you want to see more CTF video write ups or programming tutorials, other stuff that I do, please do like comment and subscribe, join our discord server, especially if you want to be kind of a part of us in jamming with me and some other cool players that are playing in HatCon 2018, opening up this Wednesday and other CTFs that come in the future. It's just a really neat community. Hey, I hope to see you guys on Patreon. That would be phenomenal and I hope to see you in the next video. Thanks.


A merchant displays his samples. We can stand right here on this roof and walk around here. And we can see almost $200 million of our investments from this roof. Here's the Chrysler building and the Graybar building. I'd say those two are worth $90 million. This one here is worth $15 million, $18 million. And 270 Park Avenue around the corner here. That's the whole block to the north of us here. That's worth another, I should think, $20 million. That's 1407 Broadway. Now, that building has got a million feet in it. We built that. CBS Radio, a division of the Columbia Broadcasting System, and its 217 affiliated stations, present the CBS Radio Workshop, dedicated to man's imagination, the theater of the mind. My name is Martin Weldon. I'm a radio reporter. The man you heard earlier pointing out some of his properties is, without question, the most spectacular real estate operator of his time. He has been praised as a financial wizard, a man of responsibility and vision who creates cities out of deserts. He has also been called a mere money juggler who buys from Peter to sell to Paul, pocketing a difference in price. A man whose elaborate schemes to build and create and develop are nothing but pipe dreams, a man who buys and sells but does not build. But whatever he is, he is a tycoon, a businessman of undeniable wealth and power. Tonight, the CBS Radio Workshop examines the personality, the living and working habits of a tycoon. Our tools are a notebook and a tape recorder, combining to create a living portrait of a man in action, the portrait of William Zekendorf. Among those who have seen him in action is Billy Rose. He has all the instincts of a Mississippi riverboat gambler. He'll take any kind of a wild chance if his knowledge tells him there's a good possibility of an enormous payoff. He seems completely disinterested in playing penny ante poker. And Roger L. Stevens rated Zekendorf's only real rival at the top of the real estate world. He is all the superlatives with which he's been described in the press. The burden that he carries on his shoulders is unbelievable. Most of the time, he's carrying in his head the deals that possibly the next 30 busiest real estate men might be busy at. Edward J. Crawford, senior vice president of Charles F. Noyes, and 55 years in the business. He's the greatest financial genius that we've ever had in the real estate business during my term. Palmer Hoyt, publisher of the Denver Post. Everybody in Denver is pro Zekendorfer against him. Now, I think they're more pros than against. Zekendorf was always unpalatable to the local fat cats, but very popular with the newcomers and the have-nots. And a lot of people said that he would never build Mile High Center, this 22-story building we have. I always thought he went. He did. Robert Moses on Zekendorf's proposed half-billion-dollar rehabilitation of Manhattan's West Side. There's no element of public condemnation for what we conceive to be, essentially, a private purpose, a good purpose, but a private purpose. And we've told Bill repeatedly that we don't think that in himself he constitutes a public purpose. Bill has a tendency to believe that. The portrait begins to fill in. It takes on detail as you observe the man in action. One recent morning, Zekendorf gave one of his 8 o'clock business breakfasts in his private penthouse dining room in the offices of Webb and Knapp, the Firmly Heads, on the 14th floor at 383-385 Madison Avenue. His guests were two financiers from San Francisco, Harry McClelland and Edward Ryan. We'll expect you to put up the money. Well, we learned a long while ago. We fell for that line for years. We put in the know-how and you put up the money. We don't do that anymore. Oh, my God. Bill pointy said, know how the other fellow puts up the money. Well, we don't care how the other fellow puts up the money. Now, I'm not kidding about this, because if you're not going to put up most of the money, we don't need you. No, that's fine. Well, we'll talk about that. We don't want any free ride, because we've got a little money of our own to put up. No, I understand that. But we haven't got enough money to all the business we're doing. Now, I'll tell you, we haven't got it. Hello? And we're all through straining ourselves for money, because opportunities are too great for us to get money from people who want to be with us. And we've been wonderful money makers for everybody we ever touched. Now, we'll cover that a little later. Here are the properties I want you to show these fellas. I want to show them 270 Park Avenue. I'll give you this list. The reason I wanted to see what a conversion job looks like from a hotel and an apartment house to an office building. Well, I think we ought to see the United Nations area, show them what we did over there. Flushing, Rosebold Field, 42nd Street Post Office, the Airlines Terminal Building, another China building over here, 40 seconds. We just bought that land. Yeah, that is in all the order here. All is more. We've got more in New York. That's enough. That's enough? That's enough. Before Second Off could start showing his guests around, an important phone call came in, asking an aide to use the time to show McClellan and Ryan around the web and app offices. He picked up the phone. It was Harry Helmsley, a broker, representing a syndicate, headed by Lauren Swing, negotiating for the purchase from Second Off of 120 Broadway. The mortgage is extended. The mortgage runs with a lease, except at the end of the 50th year, we have the right to buy you out. That's right. Call the wireman. Wait a minute. Jim O'Leary, I want to say something. After such period as we do not buy you out, it continues just at 6% and the rent that we pay you is $179 a month. Is that $30 million three a year? That's the million three and the $850 on the ground. Right. It continues at 6%. But that's what it is. Yeah, sure. Yeah. You have no question about that, Harry, is there? Well, I guess not. We're only paying ourselves our own interest. So what are you talking about? They were including the 510. This is a had-bent. The same rent that had been paid right along. Yeah, that's 6%. All right. The 6% interest without our organization, which has been going on during the previous 30 years. All right. He hung up as one of the doors to his round windowless Tickwood panel office opened. Nicholas Salgo, web and map executive vice president, walked in. He looked worried. Listen, this is a tremendously important thing. Yes, Bill. I know you're aware of that. I am in favor of knowing we were going at once. Now, this letter that you've got from them, that's fine. I want to know what lawyers are doing what on the deal? Bill, do you want to handle it? No. Then let me handle it, haven't I? I only want to ask you a question. What lawyers do? What are they doing? Besides, I told you what lawyers are handling and what difference it makes. I ask you, if it is what the fellow's names are, I'm not going to tell you every detail on it. That's wasting your time on it. I don't want to have my time with you. I want to know, Nick, are we drawing papers? Nick, this thing is perhaps the most important deal in this office right now. I guess so. And I want to know what's going on. Did you cover the question? No assets we are selling, Bill. A long-distance call demanded Zekendorf's attention, leaving this problem in the air. This time, it was Angus Nguyen, Jr., his associate in a proposed $200 million development between Dallas and Fort Worth.  Now, I don't want to make a profit, and I want to make it in the deal, not off the public. Even if the market was better, I wouldn't want to mark the property up and have it known that we took a big kill out of it before the public got in. So I can't see that argument. I think what we've got to do, I think I ought to pay you a visit down there and let them come up. I think maybe it'd be better to bring Dallas Rope up here and let them see what we can do, what we've done. You see, what I want to do is draw a picture of a stock like Roosevelt Field, which was in exactly the condition this thing is in. They cost us $2 and it's now split three for one four years later and selling for $13. They'll understand that, won't they? By this time, Mrs. McClellan and Ryan were back from their tour around the offices. It was time to get down to cases. Now, what do you've got in mind on San Francisco? I really don't know. All I say is, let's get together, let's do it together. San Francisco may not be anything for us to do together. Now, you're not limiting this to San Francisco. There may be other projects that we need an organization like yours to put over. So we have the team. We have the manpower. Our overhead is almost like the Bank of America. We've got a payroll here of $3 million a year. That's the best investment we've got. That's better than buildings. If you have the right kind of manpower, you get the building, so you get these things. Now, I don't, I want to make my position very clear as far as San Francisco is concerned, because we want to know more about it and... You've got no commitment to us. I'm not asking you for any commitment. No, I understand it, but I wanted to find out what you had in mind, so we could... Has nothing in mind. Nothing in mind. We'd like to have a powerful brand out there. This can take a lot of dough. It may be that we're walking too much the same side of the street, that we have no interest in each other. We haven't got the organization and had a lot of deals that we simply can't take because we haven't got the organization. They all put on their hats and coats and started for lunch. At the restaurant, the conversation veered away from the business at hand. I just came back from testifying in defense of a lawsuit against us for $300 million. Did you hear about that? No, that's the greatest company that was ever paid to you. The guy sued us for $300 million. The judge asked me if I had any comment to make, and I said, yes, Your Honor. I said, I'd like to match the gentleman double or nothing. That's how the morning went. A typical business morning in the life of a tycoon, a man of undeniable wealth and increasing power. What is the power that he's reaching for? I think the most important city to study is Lawrence, where you had a marriage of the demedities, the boarders, the other great merchant families and banking families, with the Da Vinci's and the Michelangelo's, the Bernini's, and the other great men of art engineering and architecture. I feel that our country is rapidly approaching that point. I wish to work out some means by which the parallel interest of businessmen, builders like ourselves, could somehow be merged with the interest of the artist and create something that is both beautiful and functional and economically sound. That's the life plan, the design behind the furious physical drive of this 50-year-old, six-foot, 230-pound, round, solid, fast-moving man who looks main to order for a Santa Claus costume. Without question, a big man physically. One of his friends, former district attorney, now judge, Miles McDonald, found him too big on one occasion. He's too big to get in the blind in the first place and too big for anybody else to hand their gun when he's in there. Then he leads the bridge. He's always ahead of everybody else. He leads them too far. His associate in the West Side Project, Billy Rose. He has the same quests, same hunger for self-identification that made Churchill tick, or that made Truman ticker, that makes Baruch tick. Bill is a kind of a city version of the Old Western pioneer who would move into a small town at 25 or 30 years later. The town was dotted with monuments to the man's achievement. And again, real estate dean Edward J. Crawford. He always likes to sell something where there's a profit in for the other fellow. He doesn't hold out for the last dollar. While his wife, like other wives, sees a man who comes home tired. He had come home and was so very, very tired.  I'm so glad you get to bed. And he was just about to turn out the light. And the phone rang. And a man wanted to see him about the deal. This was about 10, 10, 15. Some people would have said, oh, I'll see you tomorrow. But he got up and wearily put on his clothes and went out. And that took a lot of willpower to get up when he was tired and exhausted and go out and meet a man and talk to him about a deal. I've admired him greatly for that. A man, whether clerk or tycoon, is revealed by what others say about him. He's also revealed by his own words. There was the time Zekendorf became a father-in-law. Would you like to hear a little story about my son? He's a conception. He ran off and got married, you know. He called us from Washington, where they come from wherever the town was in Virginia, having been married. And he said, now, Dad, we'd like to have no publicity on this. He said, on the other hand, if we could get a little ad, maybe an inch ad, announcing it. I said, well, I'll tell you, Bill, you handle this one yourself. And I said, I'm not sure what's going to happen, but I don't want you to blame it on me. So he got hold of John Bell, who was vice president here in charge of public relations. And he asked me to give it the hush-hush treatment, which he did very successfully because all Bill did was just a leak. It only hit page one of the news, the mirror, the Harold Tribune, and three columns in the social section of the Times. You see that? I'd have to shoot free money to get that. The time he did business with Branch Rickey, then part owner of the Brooklyn Dodgers, and willing to sell his interest in a club, one quarter for a million dollars. We started drawing the papers. And the papers were already for signature. He said, now, by the way, I forgot to tell you that you'll have to wait 90 days before you know that you've got the deal. I said, why? He said, well, because I've got an agreement with two of my other three partners that they or I always will have a right to match any outside bid. Well, I said, Branch, what you are saying to me is that I haven't got a contract. What you have asked me to do is to give you a put. That if they don't want it, I have to take it. Well, they said, I guess that's right. Well, I said, I'm not in the business of giving puts. But I said, if you want to buy one, I'll sell you a put. He said, what do you mean by that? Well, I said, this is a million dollar deal. I've got to stand here ready to pay you a million dollars for 90 days or whatever the time is. And I may not get it, in which case it's too bad or I may be a big panic in the meantime, in which case I'll surely get it. I can't turn around. I said, I'll tell you what we'll do. If I get it, it'll cost you nothing. But if your partners match the bid, I want $50,000 for my trouble. He said, that'll be all right. So 90 days later, he sent me $50,000. $50,000 in a couple of weeks, a side deal with a friend. Well, maybe it isn't the amount involved that gives a man his real satisfaction. Maybe it's getting the best of a bargain. Is it that or is it something else? My vocation and ablocation are very much alike. I like being constructive. I enjoy the excitement of going off into the atmosphere of the unknown. I never like to do a deal where you can see the end of the road. The speculative possibilities inherent in the unforeseeable of the things that attract me most is like a game. Furthermore, I have a fundamental desire to be constructive and to create things. Is it also the fun of manipulating? Money, bricks, people. How does a modern tycoon maneuver his way through a deal? For example, if a man's coming in to sell you something, you turn on lights with a blue tint. If you want to sell something to somebody else, you put on a rosy tint. And if a thing's looking dull, put on a bright light. If a man's a real sourpuss and doesn't seem to warm up, I try to get him to take a drink. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. The technique of a salesman. And Zekendorf is, among other things, a salesman. What he sells is himself and his visions. And in trying to arouse in others the same enthusiasm that he feels, he cites his record. In 1946, he bought up 17 acres of slaughterhouses and slums on Manhattan's Middle East side. He announced an ambitious plan to spruce up the neighborhood. Then various communities began to kick around a hopeful, vagrant idea known as the United Nations. It looked as though the U.N. would wind up in Philadelphia. I told the mayor of Dwyer, and I asked him if he'd like to keep them in New York, and he said he'd give anything in the world to do it. I said, put your secretary on the phone for a memorandum. And I said, here it is. I hereby offer you 17 acres of land for the United Nations. At any price they wish to pay. And eight days later, it was all over. One day, Byron Foy, owner of the Chrysler Building, called to ask Zachimdorf if he might rent him a particular apartment with a ceiling high enough to display Mrs. Foy's rare tapestries. I said, Byron, while you're here, let's talk about another real estate deal. He said, what's that? I said, why don't you sell me the Chrysler Building? You see, Mrs. Foy was a Miss Chrysler. And he said, well, he said, can you hold a water and talk to him about it? About two months later, we drove up a contract and signed it to buy the Chrysler Building and the Chrysler East. While we were doing that, there was a property across the street called the Graybar Building. And we threw that in and got the whole thing under one piece of blanket financing. It ran about $52 million and the Equitable Life Assurance Society alone made their biggest mortgage, the biggest one they ever made on a piece of real estate in the United States. And I think that probably is the largest real estate deal in this city ever. And one day, Zachimdorf was stopped by a traffic light. I remember riding through 66th Street one day after being offered the famous Stirling Riding Academy, which is on that block. And I turned it down because it was presumed primarily valuable for land to be used to build a new apartment house. There were two red lights in a row. I couldn't even get through, but I did see a parking space on the side. And I said, well, here I am standing in front of it. I'll look it over. I walked in and saw these horses riding around a ring. And I saw this wonderful high ceiling and clear span and all the different rooms they had for rehearsals, for shows, and so on. And I said, this isn't a riding academy. This is to make a wonderful television studio. So we bought it. And I offered the television studio to all the companies. I received return mail letters very politely turning it down. Well, that put us into the horse business. We bought 150 horses. Started buying hay and selling manure. And we had a regular loss of about $4,000 or $5,000 a month. One day I got a telephone call from a gentleman who said his name was E.J. Noble, radio man, he said. I thought he was trying to repair my radio. But he told me that he happened to be chairman of the board of the American Broadcasting Company. Well, to make a long story short, I was ready to drop that property and lose the money we put into it. But Mr. Noble was so kind. He gave me 600,000 profit. It's now ABC's main central station. Yes, certain deals are squarely on the record. Some attracted much attention, like the erection of Denver's Mile High Building, the purchase of the Lincoln Hotel, the shopping center at Roosevelt Field, now well on its way. Other activities, though less spectacular, have been equally adventurous. It was a jail in Boise, Idaho, that they offered to us. And I looked at it for its real estate potentials. And I saw that it really had retail value. And the city said, well, do you want if we keep it for a while, we've still got a few people who've got some time to run. So for quite a while, we held out with customers and tenants, as I say. We only turned it into a parking lot. The man who bought a jail for a quick turnover was recently awarded an honorary degree of Doctor of Laws by Long Island University, of which he is chairman of the board of trustees. All this is on the record. Does it show a financial genius, a long-range planner? Or does it show a bold, lucky operator who's enjoyed a long, free ride on a rising economy? Obviously, only time will tell. But second door isn't waiting for any final verdicts. Time is too short. He goes whizzing around the country unwrapping one colossal plan after another. In his favorite role of a modern demedici, he reveals his dazzling visions of handsome factories, spacious homes, comfortable office buildings, and shining cities springing out of wasteland. Between Dallas and Fort Worth, a project for industry and housing worth $200 million on land now used to grace cattle. We hope to have a great industrial development and the source of revenue and employment, which will draw upon and add to both communities. Industrial plants and the attendant housing that would go with it. We're just getting started on this thing. We'll get underway by the fall of this year and it should be completed within the next five years, maybe 10. Depends on economic conditions nationally. A plan for the even more distant future. We are on the largest property owners in Los Angeles. There we bought property way ahead of its time. We own an area in Los Angeles of almost 12,000 acres, which is more land there is in Manhattan Island. But it's wild land. It's in the Northwest area, where it runs from the sea back to the San Fernando Valley, mostly through a mountain country. But while its future is considerably off, some unknown date, it is rapidly coming because that's the only direction in which the city can grow. In New York City, another dream with a price tag of half a billion to rebuild the shabby west side between 30th and 38th streets with a permanent world's fair and a television city. These are the dreams. Can dreams on so vast a scale come true? In Wall Street, where dreams sometimes run into dollars and cents reality, they ask the question another way. It goes, could Zekendorf survive a falling market? A sudden sharp drop in the economy. It's a highly pertinent question. Zekendorf did make his name and his money in and to some extent because of a continuously rising market. Real estate is worth more today than it was yesterday. Would it be worth even more tomorrow? Zekendorf guesses that it will. And to back up that guess, our plan's calling for investments of more than a billion dollars. Among those who've been watching is Wall Street expert Gerald M. Loeb, partner in EF Hutton & Company, author of the best-selling The Battle for Investment Survival. Certainly if the country ran into trouble, I think Web and NAP would have its problems. But remember this, we would not have much of a country if men like Zekendorf and those that go with him did not possess optimism and vision and a willingness to bet on the growth of the nation. It is men like that who pioneered in all of our now great industry. Anyway, there's no question about one thing. Zekendorf loves the spotlight, the drama of the press conference, the power to make news. Just the other day, he revealed, that his plan to develop the Southwest section of Washington, D.C., the most ambitious slum clearance project of all time, had been given official approval. And tonight. It is our plan to implement the new Wall Street Renaissance with a balance of housing, pursuant to a plan conceived by Mr. Robert Moses and Mr. David Rockefeller. This housing will be available to walk-to-work residents of the financial district of the extraordinary and character type and style in that they'll all be round buildings, 30 stories high, four, five or six of them sitting in the midst of a garden with 360-degree marine view, visible from the ships at sea, either going to or from the harbor. We have actually started our planning for it and we have volunteered to act as sponsors of this Title I Urban Redevelopment Project. That's the story of a tycoon in action. Just yesterday, he was making another deal. Moses Richter, a textile man who was thinking of buying up an Atlanta cotton company which makes bags, asked Zeckendorf to come in with him. Billy Rose brought them together. Well, if you're interested in having us join you, I think it's something we should certainly give serious consideration to. I mean, I'll tell you some of the ground rules we like to employ in joining people and ventures. We like to supply the personality, the know-how, the organization and we'd love to have the other fellow put up all the money. Does that appeal to you? Well, I thought that you possessed the personality. You mean we have a class of personalities? Well, I can see we're both walking the same side of the street. Well, I wish to assure you that you do not possess the money. You don't possess the money. Well, then we both like the same thing. I think we need a third party. I don't think you have any trouble. Well, maybe Billy Rose, he's back there. He'll put up the money. He always likes to put money up for other people. Bill, come on over here. You've been getting angels to back you for so many years. Why don't you back two guys in the right business? I have it right here on my shoe. If we're looking for the secret of one man's ability to do things, maybe this is it. He enjoys what he does. Tonight, the CBS Radio Workshop has presented a living portrait the story of a tycoon in action. Living portrait was conceived, taped, and narrated by Martin Weldon. This is Bob Haidt inviting you to join us next week when we present The Record Collectors, an unusual symposium of early American popular music. Among our special guests will be the noted singer Margaret Whiting and composer conductor Lynn Murray. The CBS Radio Workshop is produced in New York by Paul Roberts. America listens most to the CBS Radio Network.