Is tutoring better than teaching a group? At its core, the same teaching principles and skills must be required and initiated for teaching one student or a group of 30 students. However, the key difference is time. An academic hour is 50 minutes, take 5 minutes to warm up and 5 minutes cool down, and this leaves 40 minutes for a class of 30 students. If one was to speak directly with every student, this equates to 1.33 minutes per student. Obviously, it would be pointless to do this, as not alone would each student get such little time as not to be a benefit. With one to the one, you get to spend the full 50 minutes with one student. Learning a language, be it a person's native language or a second language, it takes time and practice. Power of Attention With one to one, the teacher spends the whole time concentrating on one student. This allows the teacher to really concentrate on micro issues where a student is struggling. Also, it allows the teacher to review previous work in more detail, and build a better rapport with the student. The more interesting and enjoyable classes the more students will want to participate. A one to one class allows the teacher to discover where the student's interests are and then to have the student talk or write about this interest. An example of this would be if a student likes basketball and follows NBA, the teacher can have the student explain about basketball and NBA and have the student do a project on the history of the sport, why the student likes basketball, the student's favorite player and why, etc. This encourages the student and will be able to use a lot of grammar because the student is sure of what is being written about. The student wants to express his or her knowledge of the game and educate the teacher on the subject. Peer Learning Although group work is not as efficient as one to one, it is where a teacher will spend most of their time. The effectiveness of group work is dependent on the size of the group, with groups of less than six being optimal, as again it allows enough time with each student. The one major advantage that group work has above one to one, is that a teacher can encourage peer learning in groups. If possible, it is best to have an even number of students, this allows for pairing, and thus enables the teacher to view pairs in conversations and jump in when required. Group work could also help with writing and grammar. It can be useful for students to review others work and see how they compare to their peers. Finally, with groups, the teacher can match up students in the order that they think best suits the class, for example putting weaker students with stronger students. The stronger students are able to help out the weaker ones hence helping make the work of the teacher less and a lot easier. Do you want to teach groups a one to one? Take a TEFL course. In summation, the main differences between one to one and groups are the individual time spent with each student, and the advantage of peer to peer learning. Both are useful and if a combination can be used for students this will provide an excellent learning environment for students. Speak with an ITTT advisor today to put together your personal plan for teaching English abroad. Send us an email or call us toll free at 1-800-490-0531 to speak with an ITTT advisor today.


Marker variables are commonly recommended as a solution for method variance problems, and they're often applied in research practice. In this video, I will explain the concept of a marker variable, some features that marker variables should have, and also give an overview of two statistical approaches for working with marker variables. The idea for marker variable is commonly attributed to this article by Linder and Whitney in Journal of Applied Psychology. They started from the assumption that there is a single source of method variance that affects all items equally, or at least to the same proportions. But there is one source of method variance, and these constructs are another source of variance. Now, if we have two constructs that are uncorrelated, then the only reason why their measures would be correlated is because of the shared source of method variance. If we can find a construct that we can actually measure that is unrelated to the key construct in our study, then we would call the measures of that construct marker variables. So we need to have a theoretically unrelated construct. For example, something that people have been using is whether the person likes jazz music or not. When you measure, for example, firm performance and firm innovativeness using a five-point agreement scale, then measuring whether the person likes jazz music on the same scale format could be used as a marker, assuming, of course, that that marker is affected by the same kinds of biases than the actual variables. But whether a person likes jazz music or not should not in any way be related to the performance or innovativeness of the company that the person responds for. So this is the idea of a marker variable. You find a theoretical unrelated variable and then there are a few different ways of estimating the effect of method variance using the marker. The approach that Lindel and Whitney recommend is taking the smallest correlation between the marker and all the other items or if markers that are prior designed are not available, then take the smallest correlation of all the study variables and use that as a proxy for method variance. This is called the ad hoc marker correlation approach. Marker variables have some merits. So this is actually a technique that can be effective, but it has some limitations. And marker variables are commonly misapplied. One of the most common ways of misapplying this is that you choose a marker that is not affected by the same source of bias as the items. For example, if you ask a person to rate things on a five point scale and then you ask them to report their age and you use the age as a marker, it's hardly true that how a person responds to a question about their age would be affected by the same kind of biases than how they respond to a rating scale about company performance or innovatingness. There are also misapplications that relate to statistical techniques and some of the techniques recommended in literature are actually a bit questionable. I will point out some issues here in this video that the existing literature has not pointed out this far. Ad hoc markers generally don't work. So if you try to assess the effect of a method variance just by looking at the magnitude of the correlations, you'll run into the same problem that you have with those harm and single factor tests and other simply correlational techniques. It is impossible to say if the high correlation between items is because of a method or because the items measure constructs that are highly correlated. Such models are really identifiable. I'll talk about the identification of those models a bit in another video, but generally ad hoc marker techniques don't really work and should not be used. So a prior chosen marker where you can have a theoretical unrelated construct that is measured may work choosing the smallest correlation among the interesting constructs or interesting measures does not really work. There are a couple of ways of using markers and the confirmed factor analysis way that I'll explain in this video is currently the preferred way over another way, which is called the correlation technique. Let's take a look at markers in more detail. The idea of a marker variable is explained really well in this article by Simmering and co-authors. They are explained that the marker should have two key properties. One I already mentioned should be unrelated to any of the study variables. So if you have innovativeness measures and you think that they are suspect to social desirability bias, then you need to have a marker that is unrelated to innovativeness. The construct should be unrelated to innovativeness. For example, whether a person likes jazz music, whether they think the weather is nice outside, something like that. Then another important and often overlooked feature is that the marker should have the same sources of bias as the interesting variables. And this of course assumes, if you have a one marker, it of course assumes that all indicators that you have are affected by the same kinds of biases. For example, if you think that there is a leniency bias and social desirability bias that affect your items, then your marker should be influenced by those same biases. So if people are more lenient when they self-evaluate, then the marker item should be something that people also answer more leniently to, the same for social desirability. This is an important and often overlooked feature of markers. So two important things, theoretical and related variables and share the same source of bias. This article by Spector also talks about marker variables and provides a general overview workflow for how to deal with method variance issues. And they advocate modeling different sources of method variance, for example, social desirability and extreme response style and other things. And if you have items that are affected by multiple sources of bias, then you need to have multiple different markers. They also make a good point of dividing constructs or things that we measure into these five different classes. And generally, if most of your constructs are, that of interest are, for example, behavior constructs, then your marker should be behavioral as well because behavioral constructs are affected by different kinds of biases than, for example, factual measures. If you have factual measures, if you ask persons height or persons age, there is probably very little bias there. Maybe a person who is 36 might say that they belong to the 30 to 35 category of age because they would like to be a bit younger. But generally, the biases in these factual measures are pretty small. And they are certainly different than, for example, these evaluative measures. For example, self-lineacy would not probably affect factual measures, but would affect self-evaluations. So you need to think about what is the kind of variables that I have, what are the sources of bias, and then what kind of marker could I use that belongs to the same class of constructs and also the items would share the same source of bias. There are also variables that are specifically designed or developed to be markers. And this is a nice example. There is a construct called blue attitude which measures whether the person likes the color blue or not. And it's very difficult to come up with a reason why that would correlate with anything of interest. But nevertheless, measures of blue attitude can be used to gauge, for example, extreme response style and other sources of method bias. So this is one way so you can just develop an arbitrary construct and then develop measures for it and use that, and this has been used in multiple different studies. Then there is also attitude toward neutral objects, for example, how much you like public transportation. One problem with using these kind of markers is that if you are, for example, measuring things from CEOs, you are using CEOs as informants, and if you start asking questions like whether you like color blue or whether you like jazz music or whether it's nice weather outside, that kind of things in the middle of the survey that asks about company strategy or company innovations or performance, that's gonna be pretty weird for the informant. And they may switch to a different responding style with those weird items. So one practical thing when you choose your marker should be that even if it would be ideal to use a marker that is unconventional for your survey, you need to take care that the informant does not feel weird when answering the question. Here's another example of perhaps not so good practice, but this is fairly common practice in using marker variables. So they are took by Tivana in strategy management journal, did a cross-sectional survey. They measure things about technology and things about outcomes. And all the interesting constructs were measured. They were rating scales from one to five, strongly disagree, they strongly agree. And these are, most questions are something that would be affected by social disability bias. So you want to say that, for example, they are, relationships are stable and well understood in their events. So do you want to agree on these items? But then what are the markers? So they applied markers and this is a pretty good explanation because there's actually quite a lot of transparency here and they explained the principles. But when we look at the markers, the markers that they have is the existence of controlling firm operations in South America, the counter vertical industry segments in which the controlling firm operates and whether the project solved was with Microsoft Windows. So how would these factual statements be affected by the same sources of bias than these statements where the person evaluates how the company is doing? It's very difficult to see how these items would be affected by the same, for example, social disability bias. And indeed this study found no evidence for method variance. And well, that's pretty obvious because these markers probably don't capture any of the sources of bias that may affect these items. This does not mean that the study has a method variance problem, but this evidence that they presented is not valid evidence for not being, for there not being a problem. These kind of markers are referred to as a shoe size marker variables in the literature. The term was coined by Potsakov and Mackenzie and co-authors and they explained that shoe size persons height are the kinds of things that are factual or demographic variables probably don't work well as markers when you are measuring attitudes. The same is explained perhaps a bit better in this article by Williams and co-authors. They also use the term shoe size markers. So it's critically important that your markers are affected by the same sources of bias. There's also evidence that not even all the markers that we measure on the agreement scale like one to five or one to seven are affected the same by these different sources of bias. There's a study about markers by Simmering that anyone who uses marker variables should read and understand really well before proceeding with your study and they study different markers. The markers that they have, they have these six markers here, they have the blue attitude, then they have objective or factual marker, they have tenure, they have evaluating markers, they have attitude markers and that kind of things. And they found that when they measured different sources of method variance here, for example, self-deception, over-claiming, extreme response, either negative or positive, these markers, some of them are insensitive to these method bias sources and those that are sensitive to the method by variance sources are sensitive to different sources. So it's important that you match your interesting variables, how they are affected by the sources of method variance. And you choose your markers so that they're affected the same way because not all markers are equal. How do you know whether, for example, your markers are affected by self-deception bias? Well, one is just to think through the item. Would it be something that people like to respond positively or negatively? Another thing is that some studies that have actually applied the marker before could have also measured something like this, a study measures these different sources of method variance. So there's some evidence, not a lot, but some evidence on how markers work and you can use that evidence to make decisions on which markers to add up to your study. Now, let's move on to statistical techniques on how these markers are applied. There are two main techniques. The Linda Law Whitney article originally presented this correlation of marker technique. And their technique basically has two variants. You can either choose a correlation based on a prior chosen marker. So you choose a correlation between a marker indicator and your key variables, or you choose an ad hoc correlation, which is the smallest correlation among all your study variables. So if you use the ad hoc technique, then you wouldn't have marker variables that are designed in the study, but you just use a correlation between the interesting constructs as a marker. And then you parcel the marker correlation from the correlation matrix. The parceling here basically means that you subtract the correlation from all correlations in the correlation matrix. It doesn't exactly work that, but that's the idea. So the actual math is slightly more complicated. But the idea is that if there's a small level of correlation in the data, then that is due to the method, then you take that correlation away from all study correlations and then you assume that those correlations that are left are purified from any source of method values. So this is the correlation of marker technique. Then there are confirmed factor analysis marker techniques. And these confirmed factor analysis marker techniques basically involve fitting the normal factor analysis model and including the marker items in that model. Larry Williams talks about these models and his 2010 article presents one of the most commonly used workflows for how to do this kind of analysis. So let's take a look at the problems of these items. There are marker correlation approach has two main problems. One is sampling error. And this is acknowledged in the original article as well, but they don't play its importance. So the problem basically is that if you choose the smallest correlation, then you are going to be choosing a correlation that is affected by sampling error. If your sample size is small, then one of the correlations or one or more of the correlations will be small by chance only. So here we have correlations of 10 variables from a sample size of 100 and the population correlation is 0.25. The smallest correlation is 0.06. So is the 0.06 representative of the overall correlation level between these variables? The answer is no. It's negatively biased because we choose the smallest correlation and this bias increases when the number of items increases and it also increases in small samples. So we measure the smallest correlation 0.06 and the population correlation is 0.25. So choosing the smallest correlation will indicate that there is no common source of variation in these items where in fact there is. In practice, I've never seen an article that applied this ad hoc correlational market technique and did not conclude that the smallest correlation is close to zero. In practice, there's always one correlation or more correlations that are close to zero and unless your sample size is very large and your theory is very strong and then you can basically just conclude that the smallest correlation is small, therefore no problem. So this is kind of like a get away from jail free card. It doesn't really work that well. So this technique using ad hoc correlation can seriously underestimate the magnitude of the problem. Then there's another problem. I mentioned this also in another video but are parceling out a correlation is basically equivalent to fitting a model where you have one method factor that loads on all the items equally. And then when you parcel out this method factor you're basically are modeling these, taking the residuals, what is left after the method and then assuming that that is the variance of interest. Well, there are, the problem with this is that the method implies a constant correlation. But we just saw in the table from Simmering that not all sources of method affect all items equally. So this is an unrealistic model and if you fit an unrealistic and mis-specified model to the data, then the results are generally not trustworthy. There is also the implied covariance or the implied small correlations basically the variance of the method factor. And now the question is that why would we take that variance of the method factor based on the smallest correlation instead of simply estimating it using this model? I'm not saying that this model is useful even if it was estimated but it seems that it is even less useful when you just take a correlation instead of estimating the model fully. At least when you estimate this model and when your software tells you that the model is not identified you know that you have a problem. If you take a smallest correlation and then fix the method factor variance to the smallest correlation then your software will not know that there is an identification problem. Finally, this is equivalent to estimating a factor model of residuals. So it is basically equivalent to running first the factor analysis, fixing all the loadings to be the same and then taking residual covariances and then estimating these factors on those covariances. The problem again is that this method factor also assumes variance or covariance between the constructs so it cannot really differentiate between construct related variance and method variance that way. A lot more defensible approach is to use the actual marker variables and use them in a confronted factor analysis model and this is what the literature recommends. And this is from the Williams paper, 2010 and he shows that the way to use marker variables is that you have these constructs that are correlated and these are the interesting constructs or the factors that represent the interesting constructs and these are the measures of the interesting constructs. And then you have the marker measures and you have a factor for the markers and that factor also influences these interesting measures. And then Williams goes and explains a series of a sequence of modeling of different kinds of nested models that you can do to test different assumptions about the method variance. They are using, in an empirical example, benefits administration. They're using data as a marker and that has been used in a couple of studies by Williams. But now, if we think about that these items measure benefits administration, what does the benefits factor or the marker variable factor here actually present? Is it the benefits administration construct or is it the source of method variance? We don't really know. This is, if we say that these items are correlated only because they share one source of variation, then that one source of variation would be a combination of the benefits administration construct and the method. And you're basically confounding the method variance with the benefits administration construct if you do it this way. And that is something that literature has not really noticed yet. So a much more defensible approach would be to model it this way. So like you're saying that these items that you have here are affected by constructs and they're also affected by the measurement approach. And these items here should be also affected by the construct, which is your marker construct and the method variance source. So this is a more accurate presentation of the data and it also solves the issue that you commonly have that these marker items load very highly on the marker construct and the marker construct does not really affect or marker factor doesn't really affect the other items. So this gives you a more accurate representation of the source of method variance and if there really is one source of method variance then this kind of model should be able to estimate that consistently. And as long as you have a large sample size then the estimate should be trustworthy. Now, there is another issue if you add this second factor here. Now, this is a full by factor model. So you have every indicator loading on two different factors. So if you have a by factor model where the general factor loads on some indicators that don't have a minor factor then that model is generally identified. However, when you have a full by factor model then identification becomes problematic because of these correlations. I'll talk about the identification of these kind of models in another video but at this point it's useful to understand that if you add this secondary factor which makes a lot of sense to do and which the existing literature has not really figured out yet then you run into an issue question of whether this is identified or not. It is identified in some scenarios. It's not identified in other scenarios so it's important to understand. So conclusions on marker variables. Marker variables are potentially useful. There is a lot of bad practice for example, user markers using the correlational technique instead of the converter factor analysis technique not considering whether the marker is influenced by the same source of bias than the key variables that you're studying and so on. But more thoughtful choice of markers if you actually go through the constructs that you're studying and the items that you have for those constructs and then make a list of potential sources of method variants that could affect the items and then choose your markers that in a way that they're affected by those same sources of method variants. Then markers can work. This article by Simmering and then another article by Spectre in 2019 that I cited earlier in this presentation talk about the choice of marker variables in great detail. So if you choose your markers in a way that they actually are affected by the same source of bias then the markers are potentially useful. Also, if you use the converter factor analysis technique and the full by factor model and you can ensure that that is identified then your results are potentially trust for you even if you do a cross-sectional study. However, this is easier said than done and I'll talk about the modeling of method factors in another video.


We're here at the Our Place therapeutic recovery community. It is such a wonderful place that is going to support people who are struggling with addictions, people who've been homeless, people who may have been in and out of jail, and this is going to be their community and their opportunity to rebuild their lives, to learn life skills, to learn work skills, and to be able to recover from their addiction all in one place. My experience living in a therapeutic recovery was very beneficial for me. It was really stepping out of my own comfort zone in my old identity, in my criminalistic thinking, and that's why I got off the meds because there was no more unsure there was I'm doing this and now I have a reason I have the support and I want to. If something like this was made available earlier in my life I should have did it a long time ago. I have an addiction background and I got sort of sick and tired of living that lifestyle. I wanted a new life. I never thought I'd be working for a therapeutic community. I never thought I'd be a part of this and some of the goals that I've reached you know I'm now I'm a paramedic. I've been to university. These are things that I never thought would be possible and now I'm not only a role model to other guys coming out of the institutions but it's also to my family and my son. It's amazing this program can really change lives and I'm so grateful for it. When I think of mental health I think of people in my community people in my family each of us have struggled with our mental health and it's important to recognize that hey there are other people out there who have the same struggles as I do and they've moved beyond them. That's one of the great things that this facility will provide. When our place society first brought the idea of a therapeutic recovery community to view Royal you said yes. You said yes to learning more about our place's vision for a safe place where people could rebuild their lives with dignity and with respect and I just want to say that view Royal stands as a powerful example of a community saying yes, yes in my backyard. Let's hear it for yes in my backyard.


Hey, this is Brett and this 2016 Ford F350 Crew Cab Long Box XLT is stock number 12455Z. We're here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. You're new and used heavy-duty truck headquarters. This 2016 Ford F350 has the 6.2-liter V8 gas engine. This truck has been fully-safetyed and inspected by our service shop, has a fresh oil and filter change, all the fluids have been checked and topped off. This truck is 100% ready to go. We're going to go inside, all the way around, underneath the hood, underneath the truck, in this video, and we're going to start it up. Oxford White is the color and we shoot all of our videos in 1080p, 60 frames per second. If you have HD capabilities on your computer, tablet, smartphone, or television, I highly recommend turning them on right now because it is your best way to check out the quality, condition, and options of the truck before seeing it in person. If you like the video and like how we do things here at Summit Auto in the upper right-hand part of the screen, there's a link to subscribe to our YouTube channel. Click that and then click the bell notifications and you'll get updates every time we do videos here at Summit Automotive. I've been told to show these stickers. This one's kind of wore off a little bit, but it gives you your gross vehicle weight rating and all that good stuff there. Then you have the tire pressure sticker there as well. So I've been told to show that. This one comes with the factory painted alloy rims and it has BF Goodrich Rugged Trail TA tires. These are LT26570R17s, and they have probably about 70 to 80% of the tread left on them. Even the underbody is exceptionally clean on this truck. Has the Rancho shocks with the FX4 Off-Road Suspension Package Front Fenders in excellent shape. I didn't see any dents or dings in there. Headlight lenses are nice and clear. Those have the factory fog lights, and the front bumper and lower valance are in excellent shape on this truck. You get the chrome-trimmed grille. The hood is in really nice condition. Didn't see any dents or dings on there. A little bit of water from our wash we just did on it. But no dents or dings in that hood. Looks really good. Paint looks really shiny and glossy and in good shape. No dents or dings on the passenger side front fender and the passenger side front rim. No scuffs or scrapes on that. As you go down this side of the truck, take note of how clean the body is, how reflective and mirror-like that paint is. We take these HD videos so if you are far away or even if you're close by and just cannot make the trip down, but you're still interested in purchasing the vehicle, you can see the truck, hear the truck, and have confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before you even get here. So when you do get here, there's absolutely no surprises. And you can make a smart and informed buying decision from wherever you're at. And if this video helps you make that decision, let your salesmen know that you saw the video. It was helpful and that Brett sent you. The back rim is in excellent shape and the back tires have just as much tread as the front tires. Frame and underbody back here is in really nice condition. It does have the camper package with the anti-sway bars and the box rails all look really good on this truck. I didn't see much for corrosion on them. And it's like that all the way underneath. Maybe just a little bit of dust and dirt, but very little to no corrosion. Lower rockers and cab corners all look really good. Comes with a nice set of chrome step bars. And really the only thing I saw in the truck is there's one little ding right there, but wouldn't be a truck without a little bit of the scar. Coming around to the back, rear bumper is in nice shape. It does have the back of parking sensors, full towing package, which includes a receiver hitch four pin and seven pin wiring. The tailgate is in excellent shape as well. It does have a locking tailgate. It's really light, lifts up nice and easy. And it comes with a rugged liner, drop-in bed liner on this ride. Very nice and clean. Tailgate shuts nice and easily. And as you go down the driver's side, just as clean as that passenger's side. No dents or dings on this box side. And for full disclosure, this back rim is in excellent shape as well. Coming down the rest of the side of the truck does have the driver's side door code entry. We do have the code for this truck. If you ever wanted to find your 11 to 16 Super Duty door code in the upper right hand part of the screen, I got a video to show you how to do that. Has the heated and heated mirrors with built-in directional signals. These mirrors do telescope out like so. They also fold in. They are the manual fold in and the manual telescope. Inside the XLT package gives you the gray cloth interior. There are no rips, there are no tears on the seats, they are in excellent shape. Smells very clean inside this truck. Does have power driver's seat, rubber floors, easy cleaning, auto headlamps, power pedals, tilt, telescopic steering wheel, power windows, power locks, and power mirrors. We'll hop inside, check out the miles, the radio and everything that this truck has to offer on the interior. You can see this one has 23,504 miles on it. You get a compass and outside temperature display. Instrument cluster is very nice and clean. Comes with cruise and information center controls on the left and Bluetooth and audio controls on the right. This one has the six speed automatic transmission with the optional tap shift. Comes with the CD player. It does have serious satellite radio capabilities. Turned out four wheel drive, climate controls down here. It does have the factory brake controller. Four upfitter switches has the sync system with an AUX and USB jack. Downhill assist control and stability control. 12 volt power point, passenger side format and seat are in excellent condition. No rips or tears on that. Headliners in really nice shape, I didn't see any rips or tears up there and it does have map lights right there. We'll take a quick look at the back seats and then we'll start it up and take a look under the hood. Back seats are just as clean as the front seats. No rips or tears. Get the fixed glass rear window. It does have locking storage underneath here. That locks with your ignition key. There's one on the passenger side as well. You get the heavy duty rubber floors back here too. And then you get storage behind these back seats, side curtain airbags, and child safety locks on the back doors. Bottoms of the doors all look really good. And we'll start it up and take a look under the hood. Starts right up. No check engine lights or anything like that. I would personally like to thank you for checking out the video today and hopefully from this HD video, you'll have been able to verify the quality and condition of this truck all the way around inside and out. Under the hood we have the 6.2 meter V8 gas engine. Engine base is very clean, runs very smooth. Once again this truck has been fully-safetyed and inspected by Elmer Service Shop as a fresh oil and filter change while the fluids have been checked and topped off. Again this truck is 100% ready to go. There's your mission sticker. And I would highly recommend this truck from a quality and condition standpoint. This thing's in super nice condition. And to see more pictures of this truck or one of our other 450 new and used cars, trucks, SUVs, minivans, Wranglers, halftones, 3 quarter tons, one tons, you name it. We've got to go to that website right there, www.SummitAuto.com. Full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle from two locations all at Summit Auto.com. If you want to check out more HD videos you can go to www.youtube.com. Remember to like, subscribe, and share on this video and all the videos that you see there. Click the bell notifications, you'll get updates every time we do videos here at Summit Auto. In fact in a second you will see a link to subscribe to our YouTube channel on the upper left. Links to more F350 videos like this one, the upper right, a link to this vehicle on our website on the lower left and a link to one of our latest YouTube videos in the lower right. Click those, check us out and we're super excited to help you with this Ultra Clean 2016 Ford F350 Crew Cab Long Box XLT FX4 in Oxford White. Thanks again for checking out the video, remember to like, subscribe, and share.


Everybody forced here ripping 20 21 eminence football hobby case number 11 Random hit style There are 10 hits in the case 10 spots the break We will open everything right now Type in the hits as we go and random at the very end to see who gets what Good luck everybody. Let's see what's inside. There's a horse there for the evidence Don't say don't say oh I make something chips ahoy gills Were you here for that the other night?  We don't need to we don't need to we don't need to revisit that memory Okay Big foam Don't look don't know peek him from the top camera. I'm not like you guys Diamond guarantee there's one of these in every box. Oh, where to start? Let's start Here we got a Bruce Smith auto three of five Bruce Smith I went to a lunch at a place yesterday And they had a framed Bruce Smith sports illustrated on the wall and it was just like looking at me the whole time I was eating That was yesterday Three at five on the Bruce Smith auto That's my uh, that's my story Tyreek hill auto two of ten. Nice cheetah Tyreek hill auto two of ten No, nobody said chips a hoid Nobody said that next uh Troy ounce of fine silver auto lance all worth three of ten a lance all worth silver bar auto Three of ten every nice hit there Legend next uh, this is a tough choice here. I'm gonna go here though 14 karat gold a Troy ounce dan marino two of two Nice Troy ounce of gold a dan marino And I just wanted to end with some ink up top Nice hit here very nice card here Is a russell wilson auto two of five Sick rus Marino golden a russ auto to five Good way to end the top first half. All right. Well, I know it started here. I don't know what else after that though Diamond gem auto is emet smith five of five Or sorry five of eight five eight. Excuse me five of eight emet smith diamond gem auto nice emet I don't know you guys I don't know about this one. I think you guys are gonna have to trust me here You're gonna have to trust me You have to trust me Diamond gem rookie auto zach wilson three of ten boom There are three more cards in this box Zach wilson diamond gem rookie auto three of ten Man, this is this is kind of crazy This is actually kind of there's three more cards Sick Yeah That's crazy too. Okay We got fourteen carrot gold auto Peyton manning two of two man two gold bars in the box in the case Gold auto Peyton manning two of two. This is a tough decision. This is a tough decision on the last one Shray lance ten of ten Barbie ain't shray lance Ten of ten Oh man This is getting this is getting really silly Oh, man Last card Rogers Random coming up.  I was like, oh boy. Oh boy. Yeah, erin baron erin poggers Yeah, that's pretty much what's going on right now.   It really does Oh my god, dude, I All right. All right. All right. All right, uh random time Did you oh that yeah Cool It's random time guys 10 hits 10 spots random each of them the same amount of times put them side by side to see who is getting What huge random a few very big cards here Seven a six and a one Lucky number four Or someone seven times names first One Two three four five six seven Anthony B The book ends there top and bottom And seven times on the hits Good luck everybody There's some insane cards in this case seven times one two three four five six and seven The erin rogers nfl shield down to the tyreek hill Congrats to anthony Congrats to anthony Congrats to a few other people here too everybody really but Yeah, anthony b gets the rogers shield with the the kaboom actually that's what I said though kaboom John a with the uh lance all worth trojanza silver auto one f the trey lance rp8 at 10. Congrats one Thomas j the the gold Peyton manning auto to two Oh my god, joel the bruce smith auto to five hilton with the diamond gem emet smith auto to eight Danny see the russell wilson auto to five john a the zack wilson jumbo diamond auto to 10 Ben y the dan marino 14 karat gold bar and anthony b with the tyreek hill We will get the results posted to the site. Thank you very much everybody nt coming up next


All right, it looks like make is on that brings us to eight. We're at quorum Chris is out this week. He'll be out next week as well. Brian has a conflict with the conference today But regardless, let's get jamming on the agenda. So quick reminder anti-trust policy notice. We'll review that every call Moving into the agenda mostly updates for today. So let's dive right in. So first as always the hackfest reminders October 3rd and 4th in Montreal is the next hackfest Following that we'll be coming back to Asia Pacific likely Hong Kong Singapore potentially Australia We're kind of exploring what's going to make the most sense in terms of space available as well as what works for the community One thing we do want to avoid is the Chinese New Year holiday And as well as some of the major events kind of around that time So looking at that we had initially thought potentially the week of January 14th or March 4th And we can certainly move to a doodle poll But just wanted to check quickly with this group if either of those dates seemed really good Or if there are any major concerns that that people saw and if there's no real feedback We can certainly move to a doodle poll if it sounds like either is potentially doable One cannot eat up for himself, right, but so first I'm concerned. I think that's okay Okay Yeah, sometimes we overlook a major event Appreciate the opportunity to say hey, it's the French national holiday or something But it's not if it's in January that will only be like three and a half four weeks after we were in Switzerland Correct the but we're looking more on the hackfest cadence and the previous hackfest will be October Yeah, but yeah, all right. Yeah. Yeah, I think that's fair point On on my own calendar, I know that after just after March would be a little easier for me, but that's Generally not an international celebration Gotcha It looks like There are a couple of there's real-world crypto is in California from the ninth Or the eighth to the twelfth that were the ninth to eleventh or so So if that one moved up earlier that could pose a challenge for flying to Asian back for some In and that was the in January or which month are you saying that's in January? Okay, tell me the name of the event again real-world crypto. All right, cool I'll note that in we'll check against that All right, sounds good. We'll we'll get a doodle pull out We'll check against those couple things that folks lagged All right, also the farther south we go the more summer like it will be All right Australia I Heard the vote for Australia. Yeah, I was thinking New Zealand too. Maybe Just a curiosity so you're skipping it's like either January or March. So is there reason February out so Chinese New Year Folks do leave during that our APAC team have been checking around some dates And this is after talking with China and Asia Pacific communities seem to be the weeks that work best for them But we can certainly try to Look at some other February stuff as well, but this is our the recommendation because Chinese New Year is not the whole month, right? correct I mean if we aim like beginning of February, I mean, I'm thinking, you know, it's kind of unfortunate One seems very close to indeed the December one, but And then it's a bit far out Yeah, February would seem like a more natural like yeah, this is a good middle kind of Place, but I understand there are many constraints. Oh, yeah, no, it's a good point. I know so we'll push back and see Within February if there's something like that could potentially work alright Cool moving on from there is the annual TSC election nominations closed at 5 p.m. Yesterday We had 29 folks nominate themselves really great Set of candidates there. We will kick off the election directly following this call Those that are eligible to nominate so as the 600 or so folks will receive a ballot To cast your vote. I will send a communication to all of you Just as this call wraps up that will run for one week We'll get the new TSC announced in the Thursday call next week and from there move into the chair election That's all there And then onward we've just got a set of updates. So we've got quarterly project updates I have still not seen anything come in from composer, but checking quickly if any of the composer folks are on the call And that sounds like no we will continue to you push there Indy I did see come in So I think you said that was Michael right Nathan. Yeah, all right sounds good and Michael if you want to share your screen Otherwise, I can send the link out to everyone whatever you prefer. Yes Let me pull that up and share my screen real quick. All right. Let me just Right can everybody hear me fine. Yep Great. So just a quick update on this past quarter We're seeing quite a bit of growth with in both the community and Just backing behind the maintainers as well. That's been a significant increase, but we're looking pretty well Based on our growth we worked through 94% of the CII badge and eyeing that graduation from incubation even more We've surpassed quite a bit of of milestones with that and among that those updates we've also had quite a bit of Gatherings, you know, we have brown bag events pretty consistently and the Amsterdam hackathon in the agent in the agent workshop were two highlights of the summer for us and all of these updates the running roadmap, I think we want to highlight that pretty well that is a Nice pretty consistently updated Document that continues to show where we're at As far as issues go, we're seeing just, you know, some of the typical issues of growth the growing pains. If you want to call them You know documentation community continues to Pose a difficulty at times where you know, there may be inconsistencies or lack of or on the other side redundancy and over Documentation so we're working on trying to consolidate that and Find good resources for both Developers and end users so we can you know meet the needs of this diverse set of contributors drug maps can be a great help for that. We've seen a lot of Lot of coordination also through hype. So that's kind of the hyper ledger in the Version of the HIPs for hyper ledger and it's just a project enhancement formal process And we've seen quite a few of those come in the past three months And Apart from that, we're just trying to make sure that there is some good consistency between some of the technology components such as the agency and Just ensuring that the growth that continues over these next three months doesn't stifle us in any way And then open to any questions Moving on we have There is one point I'd like to call out here and that is we've seen a lot of code growth outside of the hyper ledger indie project with you know folks like IBM and The British Columbia government creating some fairly significant code bases that have not yet moved into indie and we're working really at hard at trying to help those folks make PRs and contribute if you work with one of those groups The invitation here is please encourage them to make those PRs We really do want that code inside of the main hyper ledger indie project and then to get on you know credit as hyper ledger contributors as well as You know that code is is doing some significant Significantly helpful things in terms of helping grow the community and the usage of hyper ledger indie and making it a formal part of the project It's something that's very welcome And we're continuing to engage with them and try to you know work with them on helping get those PRs in but it's Not necessarily a priority for all the folks that are kind of working on the periphery So you have a sense of it. Oh go ahead Arna Well, I just want to respond because I know IBM is somewhat guilty in that department I'd be happy to work with them trying to help bring the gap, you know I and after that discussion with them on that front I mean, you know the other side of the coin is people don't feel like Bold enough. I want to say, you know, it's not like they don't want necessarily to contribute It's already open source, but they like well, can I make that contribution would that be welcome, right? There's a little bit of hesitation which I think is natural and so You know, and I don't mean to blame you guys for not making it welcoming enough But I think there's a natural hesitation that we have to overcome Well, and I absolutely agree and this is part of why we want to make a big deal of it, especially with the tsc that Any advice that you can offer in terms of helping us train our maintainers or you know Reaching out to those folks to help bring them in would be really helpful to us because we're kind of in that project growth stage where there's a lot of outside interest and a lot of action now occurring But like Arna says, people are fairly timid and we want to reach out to those folks and help bring them into the community And that was exactly my question as well is do you see that as the primary barrier is really kind of just encouragement helping Educate folks that it's Okay to come contribute and feel welcome in the community just general and projects are there other barriers you're seeing too Um, yeah, I think the the barriers that is first we had some pieces of infrastructure missing Meaning there wasn't a good place to put some of those contributions I think we've we've solved some of that and we need feedback on where we might be missing more Um, the second piece is involvement at hyper ledger in particular often takes voice calls And not all these teams are are used to that kind of approach And we're trying to make more use of the mailing list and more use of some of the other forms that they're more comfortable with And as we've seen some of that growth There's a lot of overlap with some of the other projects of hyper ledger that haven't been involved in indie yet For example, um at the Amsterdam in the Amsterdam community There was someone who built a blockchain explorer for indie and we all know how many blockchain explorers tend to pop up everywhere. So, um, we're trying to figure out how to best invite those folks in without causing Um any community consternation, you know, finding the right place for all those pieces to fit Gotcha, that's helpful Yeah, and Nathan I had a conversation with Sean at the Amsterdam hackfest. I have some ideas about, you know, different ways for like the contributing guide to to be improved and that sort of thing. So Um, I'm definitely willing to you know, work with you guys and see what we can do to make it a smoother process for people who Want to get involved but don't necessarily know how to But thanks Tracy Sorry, I know I was gonna say Nathan. I'll jump into I can look at help you guys with your infrastructure stuff and put on my coach Dave hat especially the Core infrastructure badge and stuff like that make sure we get Everything in place Yeah, because the other item here is I think we're ready to do graduation from incubation into active But I'm not entirely certain. I think there's a couple of That we started the process of doing the security audit And there's a couple of items on the cii badge where it depends on how pedantic we want to be We've kind of taken a very pedantic approach to filling out that form And some coaching will help us wrap that up All right, I'll follow back with you guys make sure you get all that in place. Um, yeah and security audit, yeah You know Nathan on that front the best way to assess where you are is to actually Pretend you're going to apply for the Graduation right take the form try to fill it out and see, you know, if you have any gaps where you need to fill them So I think we already have the form filled out We'll check with Tracy and Dave to see how far away we are and maybe we'll be able to get that email out sooner than later Cool So otherwise, I wanted to add a little bit to the discussion I think everything you guys have talked about will make it easier But at the end of the day, I really feel there's a human dimension This hesitation that I was referring to, you know, you're an outsider at first you don't You don't have any pretence that you can be a contributor to the project because you're new So you start your thing on the side and then your side thing becomes bigger and bigger And then you have to get through this process where you say no wait I actually know enough about this technology that can actually contribute something meaningful and valuable to the broader community That it will make sense to actually move it into the project and I think, you know, some of this I don't think the tools themselves will I mean everything we do there, of course is welcome The easier we make it the better But at the end of the day, we may still have to reach out to the actual people to talk to them and say no No, but don't hesitate. They will welcome your contribution. So again, I'll be happy to try and help out with that part I know the people in IBM were working on this. I mean touch with them. So Great. Thank you Arnau So just to clarify with that you're saying that if we take more of a proactive approach to say to reach out to these side projects if we want to label them that That would help expedite the process of getting those Updates and changes into the repository. Is that correct? Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying Great. Awesome I'll see if we can follow up with you to to continue this discussion if you said you could help us out with that We'd really appreciate it Thank you. And thank you as well to Dave, Nathan, Trace and everybody else Um Continuing on with this, you know, the releases and the activity we've had has to do a lot with the um You know, we've we've completed the ci got getting close to completing the cii badge a lot of hypes going in and There's been a lot of work with the indie agent um Which we've seen it's kind of it builds on top of the sdk and Uh extends a lot of use cases and has established kind of an environment where a lot of uh Communities are building on top of it now because they see the practicality of it Um, and our current plans again, we're hopefully we'll be able to move toward graduation from incubation see if we can figure out the last few boxes there We want to continue refining our documentation um, hopefully this can help us You know Aid those who want to contribute um to contribute in a much more efficient manner and feel less intimidated Perhaps by the the code based on by the community um And then there are kind of project specific within india different goals to help kind of polish a couple more things off As i mentioned before with maintainer contributed diversity. We have a couple new maintainers for indie agent And they're from different communities. I think we have steven steven curran and matthew hailstone from ui u and nbc gov. They're they're really contributing quite a bit and they were self Volunteered or in other words that they really contributed on the projects and decided to help contribute even more So we've loved having them on board And with contributor diversity again as nathan said, you know, there's a lot of work going on out there And we just want to try and get it in but we've seen a lot of communication over rocket chat and on the mailing list I feel like it continues to grow pretty well Any any questions on that? Thank you. All right. Thank you all All right, and Just wanted to chime in. Thanks for the the really thorough update and especially forgetting that in uh unscheduled And then for next week, we'll have uh hyperledger borough update Okay, then moving into the final topic for the day on the quarterly work group updates public sector work group rose Are you on I know The update did come in Marta, are you on? I am on uh rose is uh saying that she will be on as well Okay, uh, but uh, let me Would you post the uh report that I can report back? Yep, uh, I just posted it in to rock it and then let me just post it into the zoom chat as well one moment Did that did you receive that did did you want to provide the update in roses absence or are you trying to get her on the Sorry, I was I started to give an update and muted myself Yes going back. Uh, the group has launched in the june uh 2018 so very recently It's the youngest working group. Uh, and t s uh in hyperledger um, we've I've been chairing it for the first few weeks uh, but very quickly Rose took over because she has been proving to be very active and very interesting and thank you tsc for nominating her um, it is about 18 to 22 people every call we meet On every other friday when it's not the healthcare working group meeting um I think that uh, the biggest issues and problems are around Not having enough public sector representatives. It's rather people who want to work with public sector um So, uh, rose is planning to do more of direct outreach particularly to to kind of encourage the folks that subscribe to the mailing list and subscribe to To the group to make sure that they really Work They members are more Programmatic than a technical which is the case for many of the industry specific working groups So one of the challenges will be if we want to Uh implement something coming out of that group to find people who actually have the knowledge and ability Uh, however, the group has been working very actively. Uh, I would say that How for the group is really good. Um, the chat channel has low activity, but uh, So is the mailing list, but the discussions are really good There was a survey that was created To find the ideas for what we want to do The survey and the emails answers are Uh in the report um The biggest That kind of shows the top the people that are on the in the group and it also shows the Some of the issues which is the biggest access is to get Interest is to get access to libraries of use cases. Uh, so really people come there to learn, uh, but there are not many people to teach We are now connected to with uh, and or we have created a concept where every Call there is a project presentation Until up until now we had projects from smart dubai Governments of Ontario and British Columbia and Canada There is also a lineup for next calls. We want to that way to kind of inspire people and then Get them to ask questions Group has submitted the panel proposal to the hyperlateral global summit, which I think is a great show of, you know Being able to come together in a very short period of time and actually producing some work Uh, we are planning to create a use case repository on the viki or wiki We will continue to work on project presentations And we'll hopefully we'll get the submission in and then we can uh, do the panel as well There is a good diversity in terms of the representation and geographic spread, but there is not much diversity in technical versus general capabilities um So we would love from tsc Uh to refer us more members if you have in your companies or if in your Ecosystem people who would be good contributors to the group. Please send us them our way and We feel like this group is starting to shape up as a programmatic space And The discussion of how to communicate concepts to layperson decision makers is one of the big topics recently Um, so that's it and I'm looking for questions This is whipping. Hi. How are you marta? Hi, Zitin Uh, so, uh, I know that uh, There are Organization, I mean, let me put it this way. There are schools like like colombia school of international public affairs Um, you know, it's one of those institutions So have you, you know, we we've had uh, hyper ledger presentations there like I have presented on digital identity and privacy, but Most of the others are concerned with public policy. It's a school of international public affairs, so they Talk about that stuff a lot. So there are some contacts there where You know, and I'm sure that the similar programs exist in other Other universities and I think uh, this would be a great, uh source of Sort of reaching out to the practitioners Who interact with You know the governmental agencies or governments in terms of Blockchain because they're also very interested in this blockchain business This is a very good point. Actually, um, we are just working with colombia to get them And as associate members, um Um, so this will be a good opportunity, but you're right. We should try reaching out more to the academic environment Hi, mantard. This is bohua Um about the public sector group meeting How many persons are from the isopacific area? Do you know that? Not that many or there are many subscribed to the mailing list, but there are not many participating in the meetings I would imagine it could be the time problem. Uh, we are looking at, um shifting the time and Another quarter so to have six months in one time zone and six months in another time zone Okay, uh, let me see, uh What we can do to have entirely more persons to attend a meeting That would be wonderful Great. Any other questions for marta? Uh, thank you marta for for doing the overview there And then just a quick reminder for the quarterly work group updates The next one will be not until september 6, but uh, that will be the architectural work group at that time So that brings us to the end of the agenda for the day Um, happy to give everyone 30 minutes back to your busy schedules But just take a quick minute any other questions comments thoughts from the group Yeah, the global summit you don't really list that in an upcoming events. Is that because it's not a technical thing? Um, yeah, so we had listed it before just around the call for papers for technical topics But it's a good point. Let me just add that back to the reminders on an ongoing basis Just so folks remember and what does registration for that close does anybody know? Uh, daniella, do you happen to know off the top of your head? I suspect probably November-ish time frame, but um Yeah, I'll look it up. Don't worry about it. All right sounds good. Thank you Related Sorry, um bob here related question there. Does anyone know what the timeline is? On which talks for that are going to be finalized Yeah, I believe that gets announced on september 11 Um, or right about that week is when we're we're gonna announce the agenda So I think speakers get notified shortly shortly before And I can add that into the minutes. I'll I'll get a firm date for you. Thank you Um Doesn't sound like any other questions. So thank you everyone for the time and uh, we'll chat with you all next week Have a good day everyone. Thanks everybody. Have a nice day. Thanks everyone. Have a good day. Thank you


Hey there friends. Thanks for checking in the question I have and the purpose for this video is to answer this is the ammo crisis ending or at least Nearing the end I'm going to get to that but to illustrate my point. I brought out my 1911 this is a desert Eagle 1911 case hardened frame. I show it off all the time, but I remember when I first got this handgun I was so excited That even driving home, I would stop at a red light and I'd open up the case. I check it out. I took it home. I Disassembled it. I played with it. I stared at myself in the mirror, you know You do that too now, don't you? I do and I certainly did with this desert Eagle 1911 And I'm still very much excited about it, but over time, you know It kind of wears off a little bit and I think a lot of people would say that there are certain guns that when they first got it the jubilation if you will was Overwhelming, you know, you think about the first gun you got and how excited you were to get that gun You know, you research whatever the case you got it and you were excited How does that relate to ammo? Well now The way I see it is that it's not just the gun that excites people It's that ammo score if they can get it, you know, they get a couple boxes of ammo There's a two box limit they get their two boxes and they are so excited Maybe not to the degree that they're going to open it up and look at it in a red light but the excitement of scoring ammo in 2021 is amazing when people are Overwhelmed when they can actually get it the very Substance that we said, you know, that's that's a dollar fifty too much. I'm just gonna let that go I can get it cheaper somewhere else now. We're paying upwards of thirty to fifty dollars for a box of nine millimeter 45s outrageous rifle ammo is you can hardly get it and the Heavy-duty stuff for hunting is near impossible. So is the ammo crisis ending? Let me switch positions here and I want to answer that question and give you my thoughts on the subject 39.99 for a hundred round pack of American Eagle 556 remember those days or 500 rounds of blazer brass 200 bucks 210 1400 rounds of 22 70 80 bucks Are those days over or are they coming back? Well, let me tell you what I think When you drive past a gun store or a big box store or any place that sells ammo and you see grown men Waiting in line one after another the line could stretch out to 40 yards and you see people waiting in line Who typically would not wait more than three people deep to go to their favorite restaurant? Like I wouldn't if I went to my favorite restaurant and I had to wait for not just One or two but three people they say oh, it's gonna be 20 minutes. I'm gone But when you have grown men waiting in line for hours To get ammo because they believe somewhere in that store There's something like this It tells me one thing Ammo no longer is just about supply and demand although it is the supply chain for the parts that make it the Outline stores who are not making money, so they're raising prices It's not just all these things that we come up with Reasons of why there is no ammo available. It has turned into this fear the fear of Not getting it when we need it the fear of the ammo even doubling from the outrageous prices that we're seeing right now The fear of additional taxes coming on the fear of ammo bands the fear of online sales disappearing the fear of not having Adequate supply the fear of even shooting because we know that we may not be able to replace our ammo and So I think fear has taken over a lot of our emotions and when you went the fear which is an extremely powerful emotion takes over and Then we talk about is it ending when I see guys Lined up one after another because they think there is ammunition available inside that store When they typically would not do that that tells me that the ammo crisis is not ending in fact it could be Getting worse. I am watching Cost per round actually increase. Do I think the ammo companies are pumping out ammo? Of course, I do. Do I think that the stores are getting adequate supplies?  I'm actually happy for them. You know, I Feel the same way when when I get it, but That should not give us false hope that the ammo crisis is actually ending My advice would be to be patient. Don't overpay once the fear factor is Removed from our mindset. We will have more success with ammo until then so long as there is fear and in righteous fear by the way because I'm actually fearful of Additional tax and ammo bands and you know supplies being limited to how much we can get I am very much worried about that with these new bozos in the White House however, as long as there is fear and People that will go to extreme lengths like stand outside in the cold an hour before a place opens to get ammo Which is typically unusual for guys to do that that tells me that the ammo crisis is not ending and I think that When people overpay by a large margin, you may have regret if it was me Who was short on ammo? I would be careful not to do that But at the same time it's hard to say because we're all different positions But I would also be careful to make sure that I had enough that I needed in case in fact I did need it. I hope this is helpful. I don't want to be depressing and I don't want to invoke fear But that's my reality of the current ammo situation if you like videos like this, please subscribe and share I always appreciate thumbs up button. Thanks for watching and you guys be safe


The predictive map hypothesis suggests that the hippocampus is responsible for encoding the expected state occupancy of locations in the environment. This hypothesis is supported by behavioral and electrophysiological evidence, and can be explained by a model based on error-driven temporal difference learning. This model utilizes spiking neurons modulated by theta-band oscillations, diffuse and overlap in place cell-like state representations, and experimentally matched parameters. It also explains the topographical ordering of place field sizes along the dorsal ventral axis, which prevents the detrimental mixing of larger place fields, which encode longer time scales, with more fine-grained predictions of spatial location. This article was authored by Tom M. George, William DeCothe, Kimberley L. Stachenfeld, and others.


Rwy'n gweithio'n gwahodd yn ymwneud y gallwn ymwneud yma'r fideo sy'n ymwneud yn 2019, yn ddiweddol i'r iawn. Felly, mae'r MP20-18MB. Rydyn ni wedi gweithio'r 7 iawn ar gyfer, ac mae'r ymddor i'r gweithio'n gweithio ar y cyfan yw ymddor i'r iawn yn y llongau'r iawn, ac mae'n gweithio'n gweithio y flוא i'ch chi i mwy ar hyn arno! Rwy'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio ar y cyfan yw ymwneud yma, ac mae'r 3 iawn ar y ddech chi. Rwy'n gweithio'n gweithio ar gyfer ac mae'r iawn ar y cyfan ymwneud. Felly, mae'n gweithio'n gweithio. Chestor fel'na hi'n adnolmwy o ddechau yn eu Caerdydd, mae'n bob i ddwy o'n gweithio'n gweithio. Felly, mae'n gweithio fydd mewn gwag aelodau'r wneud ac mae'n gweithio'r camera o'r ddweithio, felly rwy'n gweithio'r llunio'r ddechrau. Yn rhaid, mae'n gweithio'r ddweithio. Ffwrdd, rwy'n gweithio'r ddweithio'r mp20 HMB. Rwy'n meddwl y 7 iron, ac mae'n rhaid i'r momentau ddweithio. Rwy'n meddwl i'n meddwl i'r club. Rwy'n meddwl y rhan o'r ffaith. Rwy'n meddwl i'n meddwl i'n meddwl i'n meddwl i'n meddwl. Rwy'n meddwl i'r ddechrau, nawr mae'n meddwl i gef pledgef. Rwy'r meddwl i ei meddwl i Aberju. Rwy'n meddwl i'r 3 iron, HMB mp20 sprig o thysg'n boeth, gestureidd y don講i'r ddaeth. Rwy'n meddwl i'r ddechrau,ni os ymgyrch am ganes, ydw i'r baitiriad fy cornedad. Mae kullwni ar gyfer y test ni, neu gallwch yn credu bod vine cael unedol. Rwy'n meddwl i'n meddwl i'r ddechrau. Rwy'n meddwl i'r club i gael eich mun rend malt hwyl. Ac rwy'n dweud i'n cysylltu i chi chi'n gwneud yn ymddangos i'r Ymddangos i chi, neu'n gweithio'r cyfnodd, oherwydd yr un oedd dweud i chi. Rwy'n dweud i chi'n gweithio'r cyfnodd, yr un oedd yn dweud i chi. A gwnaeth eich gweithio'r un oedd yn ôl i'n gweithio'r llai, ac rwy'n dweud i chi eich gweithio'r llai, i chi'n gweithio'r llai, i chi i chi i chi i chi, y stryd o'r wahanol. Y cyfnod o ddweud eich bod yn allan i'w ddwy'r gwahol. Felly, yw'r gwerthu ffordd o'r gwaith. O'r llai'r llai ffotodol, oherwydd mae'n gweithio'r gwahanol ystod yw'r gyfnod wedi'u gwahanol. Mae'n gweithio'r wahanol o ddweud. Mae'n tynnu. Mae'n gweithio. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio. Dyna'n ddigol yna. Mae'n defnyddio eu bod yn fückol. Rydyn ni'niem yn English e, gollun o'i arddun peidydd yma, oherwydd i'r hynny'n ei fod yn ymhiliobau, ac mae'n fyddion o feidio bod yn ymhiliot. Byddwn ni'n ddwybg fyddion αeol, oherwydd mae hi'n cyndrygu'r Drixon, ac yn ym 85 mae'n hynny'n agnod ohol o'r bach mae hynny'n ymhiliot nad yw hynny. Rydyn ni'n oedd yn iawn o bach yn eu profiol. Felly mae o'i yma fel y prif i'r ddweithre Hulk, I always say this, I might not have the ability to hit these irons, but I'll love a long iron off the tee. Question is, how does it perform?  Now I said, I have hit this off camera, I hit some last night, and I've had a bit of a warmth this morning. That's what they call a golf shot. What starts the day, what starts the video at least. That's probably the best shot of it all morning. And the point is this, and I reference Brian Treadwell, who's part of team average. He's tried this also. It's a strange old golf club because it's a small and compact three iron. Visually what you'd expect and what resonates in the brain is that that's going to be a tough club to hit. It's going to be a tough club to get launching. It's going to be tough to find a sweet spot. They're all the things that register straight away in my brain at least when I look at that type of club. And it couldn't be any further from the truth. The launch is fantastic. It gets the ball up so easy. I'm hitting off the mat and off a tee for all this data I get. This is coming straight off of the mat. I'm getting ball speeds across the face. It's just, again, defies what it looks like it should perform, if that makes any sense. I don't think you can hear the strike, but they're absolutely flying out there. Like I said, I tried to do the last few videos where I was giving you an immediate reaction. So I saw the first time hit and I'd be lying if I said that was the case here. I have hit this off camera and I've recorded a bit of data already, which will go through very soon. But the big surprise, like I said, I'm letting no secrets out the bag before we look at numbers, is just how the ability to launch this ball is incredible.  I'm sure there's one in there and I'm sure that, you know, that's a bit of a false. There's another one. I do wish we could get the camera, I can't film from the back of us and I don't have any software that gives us the visual out there into the driving range, I'm afraid. But I wish you could see these balls because trust me, we'll see it in form of data. Comments down below. What I'd like to know is how many of you would consider going up to a three iron in the bag? So how many clubs of Mizzou know what you're going to sell? How many clubs are they going to go to a pitch away to a five iron and then it's four iron and five iron, four iron, three iron and so forth, is down into hybrid? That's the thing I don't know. I don't know whether I'm on my own. I know, like I said, I like a long iron. The other thing I will say, and I'll attempt to it while on camera, is that, again, I like to shape the ball. I very much find it very comfortable to hit right to left and left to right shot on this. It's very, very playable iron for those who like to do that as well. But I think there's not a great deal more to be said. I think for me, the club that I would just reference to it as well is the Callaway X4's UTI and I think they called it. For me, the one thing I've not mentioned is feel and it's got unbelievably good feel. I'm what we found in the HMB7 iron and it likens very much similar to me to that of the Callaway. It just seems to have, in terms of the numbers I'm getting and the performance that I'm seeing, just a little bit more meat in it. Let's see if we can hit a bit of a fade to finish. I'll tell you what, it is absolutely, I can't do no wrong with this golf club. I love it. Maybe when Jimmy's not looking, I might just slip this one in a golf bag, I think, because it is that good. But anyway, let's see what the numbers say. Right, so plenty of balls hit and to be honest with you, I hit a few more than normal in terms of the testing. I was enjoying it that much. But let's get, as ever, stuck straight into these numbers and just have a look at what we've been doing. I'm reading these out because I haven't took a great deal to absorb the info. Ball speed, just touching 130 off an 85 average club speed. Spinning quite high actually, 3-7 spin, but I think that could be a positive depending on how you want to use this club. Average carry a 195 and some fairly consistent numbers there. We've got one at the bottom and two at the bottom end at 190 and top end at 200. Launching 11.1, it's a bit of a surprise me really because of PK67. A bit of a surprise with the launch, because it seemed to be visibly launching quite a bit higher than that, to be quite honest with you. But I think those numbers are exactly 195 with that kind of spin number. You're looking at a club that's going to finish around 220, something like that, 215-220. And I think for me, if I was choosing to play this club, I ain't going to be playing it much into greens. A 3 iron with an 11 degree ball flight, it's going to be something I'm going to choose to play from the tee. Long par 5 is maybe second shot, that kind of thing. But I think it's a club that will not suit everybody in terms of not fitting a gap in the bag. Because I think that's what you've got to be looking for. For me, on the course, I like to play and where I'm playing. So on our links course, the opportunity to play that off the tee and get that one chasing down the fairway in the eye to summer is absolutely perfect. But like I said, not going to be suited in all sort of conditions. But overall, just a really, really nice golf club to hit. And I've not, I've paid now seven iron and three iron at the HMB. I've not hit anything in between. But I can imagine that, like I said, judging by where we've just been from seven to three, I just think it's a fantastic make-up of clubs. And I think that again going back to this thing with MP20 range in full the ability to blend the set in in the shorter irons, maybe the MP20 blades up to these HMBs in the longer irons, I think it's a fantastic opportunity. They've got a brilliant, brilliant set of product in this MP20 range. And the three iron doesn't disappoint one bit. Straight forward, no more to say. As ever, thank you for watching. Some comments down below. Like I said, would you use the three, four iron in these clubs or is it a case of do you switch over to hybrids? And as ever, I'll see you very, very soon.


All right, today we're looking at a walk-in freezer that's freezing up. Yeah, we got a coil here. It's all beat the heck So we're testing out our clock Which Can't tell if certain it's moving yet Also got a leak going on All right, so we pumped it down took it down to zero maybe a pound or two above it and rebraise that suction line Left it vented a little bit just to case any pressure build up got that there Right now we're just Straightening out these fins, which is a good time it this is that a So the kids are around it quite a bit So we're just kind of going through patiently trying to straighten these out as best as possible because Hasn't been done for ever And that's the original compressor. I thought that was a replacement, but it's an o3 compressor. So it looks like a malfunction of a braze joint From the factory I was able to suck it into the pockets of both the presser one on the elbow there No leaks found on the Pressure switch. I've got the clock like I said marked and I believe it's tracking. Yep Yeah, it's tracking. See the blue mark there They had shut this off for me before I got here But it's definitely low. So I'm thinking it's probably never hitting the temperature Just run run run run run run run. So We're gonna wash this thing out once we get done probably go ahead and chemically clean it because it definitely is a mess it's got It's it's crammed down into those fins and you can't see nothing when you look at it from the back side Coming through this way here. You can't see squat. I just now had a chance to look closer at this defrost clock, but A little bit whopper gel there and like he said time was off Me not do you a whole lot of good. So we're gonna even those out may actually take it to three instead of the two they had They have an evaporate or a walking cooler before this And that's gonna get a lot of the humidity out prior to any of the issues that got going on, but Probably gonna switch it to that and they got the timer set pretty high, too I don't know if the defrost termination is working properly either But it sounds to me just basically to cumulated and between that and the refrigerant being low So we've kind of gotten some progress going on here with this You can kind of see that they're little mangoided using the My robin airbrush. I think it is it's got multiple different heads on it so Runs a chemical cleaner in it first and kind of see what we got going on. This is only like two layers thick I'd rather have a gap than no gap that way at least got some air going through the copper did do a little something new to my freezing bag here ended up putting Washer in there in the rivet So that allows me to zip that thing open and everything right there on the bag was watching Forget the channel Let's watch one of the other channels and they were talking about putting magnets on the back of this to put it up against your Shelving in your truck so it won't fall over. So I've using a bungee strap might consider doing that I'll put the link for that channel on the display so you can find that Information, but yeah when I get both hands, it's not so bad you can So unfortunately, I don't have the fancy Viper stuff all I've got is new bright Got the yellow there for my evaporators got big blue. Well, not even got big blue We're all new Calgon here, unfortunately That goes earlier Learning to cope your temperature Eight degrees suction line temperature. It's 70 degrees or better inside. So it's going to set their breeze up Insulation So went ahead and put it into defrost. I'm trying to look at the defrost heater. It's sticking out of the side there for some reason Really ain't got nothing growing on the evaporator, but we definitely got something going on here at this TXV area I've not gotten good explanation of what the whole problem was since the beginning so What we fixed so far has Needed to be done, but wasn't the initial reason honestly most of the reason of what's going on It's whoever installed this used two thin of insulation. How this is just now starting to become an issue. This has been installed 2003 You know, it's like come on.  There's a port there. So I should be able to check super heat I don't think super heat is our issue. Like I said, this insulation is an issue All right. So basically we made some adjustments to the super heat for this freezer It was running way up there in the I-20s almost 30s area right now as you see we're running 7.2 It's fluctuating down to the mid-sixes back up to 9 our box temperature Now the head pressure obviously is not hooked up We're running right around 11 Which we've been keeping the door open. So we got it all adjusted Suction port there got my suction line over there. So just put away a little bit better being right on the coil We took that defrost out. We're just gonna have the tube spaced out every 12 hours You can see it's feeding a lot better than what it was. We got all that out There's a little piece in that fan motor there. We got that fixed So it's looking a lot better than what it was by far. I think we're gonna go ahead and leave it alone We're running a 31 degree super heat We're not frosting up like we were earlier in theory. I mean it was starting it Check our site. Glad to make sure we're still full.  We'll go ahead and get that set which We're to 30 good It'll go into a defrost which will make up for us having that door open so much We'll do that here shortly There's about 32 minutes area. I think that's gonna be fine All right, so she's satisfied and she's ready to go the timer set up The coil looks a lot better than what it did. You can actually see some stuff getting through it We've got super heat set correctly. We were good out here on the super heat It's like I said supposed to maintain that minimum of 20 according to Copeland. We got that The line is not running just cold So We're maybe gonna fix this issue. It's not, you know still ain't the right insulation but I told him to save your money Check it out. Make sure that it's freezing up still and if it It does fine. We'll have the insulators come out and do it and then Otherwise everything's a lot better than what it was. We got a leak repaired We got the super heat set right coil cleaned the coil straightened and Everything's working pretty good. We got that ice off the end of the coil So that's gonna wrap it up guys. If you enjoyed it, don't forget to check out our Facebook page HVACR survival and We're also going on Instagram. Don't forget to give it a big thumbs up. We'll catch you on the next one


Over the past two weeks, and as a result of the heinous crime of George Floyd in the United States, we have witnessed the extraordinary transformation of the Black Lives Matter movement into a global mobilization against racism. This momentous events are happening against the backdrop of the coronavirus pandemic, which has revealed the stark inequalities that wreak havoc with many societies around the globe. Both events are connected. In country after country, it is minorities and vulnerable groups often discriminated against on account of the color of their skin that have borne the brunt of the consequences of the pandemic. The Black Lives Matter movement is a visceral reaction against racial inequality. But it stands for something broader, just as the struggle against apartheid in South Africa did. It stands for human dignity writ large, and for the proposition that all human beings are equal in worth. This proposition is of the heart of democracy. Those of us that care about democracy have the moral obligation to speak up today and say that Black Lives Matter. They matter for justice. They matter for equality. And most certainly, they matter for democracy. Black Lives Matter.