Hey everybody, what's going on? I am Greg Susman joined today by our own game, Marenzie, as we take a look at his six best bets for week nine of this NFL season. What's happening, Gabe? Ready to rock and roll. Let's do this. Let's begin in London, our final London game of this season as the Houston Texans and Jacksonville Jaguars travel from the early morning kickoff here on the East Coast at 9.30 a.m. You've been all over these London games all season long, Gabe. What are we like in this one? You know, the AFC South is an interesting division. It's one of the most competitive divisions in the National Football League. Every year, basically, to win this division, you're nine and seven, and you might be tied with somebody. Tie breakers are always massive in this division. Another thing about the AFC South, it's sort of like fighting, and it's fitting we have a massive UFC card and Madison Square Garden this weekend that styles make fights in this division. History repeats itself over and over and over. The Colts always beat the Texans. The Titans can't beat the Colts, but the Texans always beat the Jags. History repeats itself. This is one of the more one-sided rivalries and division rivalries in the National Football League right now. The Texans have beaten the Jaguars nine to the last 11 times that they played. The point spreads one point here. So we sort of take that out of the equation, the point spread, so we can just talk about straight up. They've beaten them nine to the last 11 times they played. They're 14 and four against the Jags, the last 18 times that they played. Houston Texans are getting MVP caliber of football right now from the Sean Watson. I don't think he's gonna win because the record won't be good enough in the end. I think Aaron Rodgers will be your MVP this year, but for the record right now, FanDuel has the Sean Watson at plus 350 to win the MVP. The Texans are seven, two, and one against to spread their last 10 games on the road. And albeit in London, it's a neutral game. No, is it in Houston, Texas? No, then it's on the road, right? And technically it is a road game. The Jags are the home team and this is the Jags home away from home. They might actually have more fans at London than they do Jacksonville. And I'm not just saying that. They're popular in Jacksonville. Their owner lives in London. This is the seventh time the Jags have played there for the record. They're three and three straight up. And against the spread, make it three and four. As history repeats itself, give me the Sean Watson over the dude with the mustache. Good for you. You got a mustache. The Sean Watson's one of the best quarterbacks in the league. The Houston Texans are gonna barbecue the Jags in the land of fish and chips. Give me the Houston Texans. Texans are the play for a game. Just a one point spread here in this one. So it simply does not matter. The Houston Texans is the better football team, the team that Gabe expects to win on Sunday. Moving on, we go to the Indianapolis Colts who are also a slight favorite here this week facing off against Pittsburgh and Gabe, this team may be without both T.Y. Hilton and Eric Ebron and yet you're still buying the Colts. Well, it's a problem, Greg. This is the thing. We don't do these videos Sunday morning at 12.50. If you want that, then come visit us at the Fando Sports Book for our last second picks. What are we gonna do? We can't be worried about injuries right now. You know, similar situation with this Minnesota and Kansas City game. But I'll tell you what, one thing about the Colts. The Colts are actually a better road team than they are at home, which is kind of strange. It's a recent trend that we're seeing. Look at the World Series. Home field isn't what it used to be. It's not granddaddy's home field anymore. We'll put it that way. You look at the Indianapolis Colts, they beat Tennessee on the road. Tennessee's not an easy place to win. They beat Tennessee on the road. They beat Kansas City on the road. They go home. They lose to the Raiders outright. It's like six and a half, seven-point favorites or whatever it was. It might have even been higher. Denver last week, they were lucky to win that game. Joe Flacker was right. Denver gave them that game. Indy really didn't have any business winning that game, but that's why we're getting value here. Pittsburgh's got problems, guys. Don't be fooled by the fact they beat the Miami Dolphins. And I give credit to the Steelers, the fact that they're only one game under 500 right now that they battled back like this. But it's one thing to beat the Miami Dolphins on Monday night. I don't like the spot short week as well for the Pittsburgh Steelers. And I like Indianapolis. Talking about injured players, and Greg, you brought up E-Broad, you brought up T.Y. Hilton. I don't really even mind that. It's gonna force them to run the ball a little bit more, play a smart road football game. To me, Darius Leonard is the most important player on the Indianapolis Colts right now. We see the difference that it makes when he's on the field and he's not on the field. The Colts have been very good on the road, and I'm not just saying that. There's seven and two against to spread their last nine trips on the highway. Make it 8-2. Colts went a close one on the road. It should be lower scoring, but I'm not gonna mess with the total. Give me the horseshoes. A low-scoring game is what we predict in this battle between the Steelers and the Colts. Darius Leonard, the most important player on the field, and he can be the difference between a win and a loss for Indianapolis on Sunday. Up next, the battle between the Eagles and the Bears. Eagles are a 4-1-1-1 favorite here in this one on the FanDuel Sportsbook, and it's a revenge game for Jordan Howard. You buy an in-game? It's a quadruple revenge game, actually, as the birds have owned the Bears over the years. They've beaten them four straight times, including in last year's playoff game, as well. You mentioned the number five, and I'm really glad that it's moved off of the number five to 4-1-1-1, because five is a crooked number. All right, and Eddie Oddsmaker, Bookmaker will tell you when the number is five, they're basically letting the market decide the football game. You know, I think these are teams going in different directions right now. Philadelphia are volatile. Philadelphia, it's amazing how all these Philadelphia sports teams are the same. Like, they can either be really, really good. When things are going well for them, they're really, really good.  And I think the Philadelphia Eagles might have found themselves last week against my Buffalo Bills, and we gave congratulations to the Eagles. They played a hell of a football game. The Eagles really are that good against the run. When I saw their stats, and, oh, they're giving up 62 yards and all that type of stuff, I was like, yeah, whatever, man. They're playing in these track meet pass-happy games. But the fact is, you can't run on these guys. You really can't run on the Philadelphia Eagles. And we all know their weakness is the secondary. While we talk about styles make fights, the Chicago Bears don't have the best passing game. Very similar to the Buffalo Bills. I look at the Bills and the Bears, they're kind of the same team, really. And I know like they're different. Each team is different. And the Bears aren't the same as last year, but generally elite defense, pedestrian offense. And I think the Bills offense is better than the Bears offense. So, and this is at Philly. So the Eagles are gonna take away the ground game. They're gonna force Trebisque to beat them through the air. And I don't think he can do that. And also the Eagles are getting healthier. I'm a big Jason Peters fan. Makes a massive difference to their offensive line. And they're getting to Sean Jackson back. So should get about two, three quarters out of him before he gets hurt again. Give me the Philadelphia Eagles minus the four and a half points. In that quadruple revenge game, the Eagles will do enough to get by the Chicago Bears. And ultimately to Sean Jackson will hopefully last the length of this one. We'll take the Eagles by four and a half. On next, the Minnesota Vikings in Kansas City, probably without Patrick Mahomes for the Chiefs. Vikings, two and a half point favorite in this one. In a game we expect them to get Adam Thielen back in. Gabe, what say you? Well, we can't confirm that Mahomes is gonna be out as of right now, but I don't think he's gonna play. He practiced Thursday, wasn't in pads. No reason to rush him back. They're still gonna win this division anyways. So I'm assuming it's gonna be Matt Moore, but the betting market is betting on KC. I mean, this was three earlier in the week, two and a half, two, one and a half. I wouldn't be surprised if it even fell to one, as we're seeing a lot of one-point road favorites this week. Now listen, you guys know the drill. When the Minnesota Vikings are playing non-division opponents, I tell you this every week or every couple of weeks, when they are, you have to take them. All right, now I know it's better at home. It's like monstrous at home. It's literally like 22 and two at home right now. But overall, Mike Zimmer is 40, 14 and two against the spread. That's right, 40, 14 and two against the spread against non-division opponents. He feasts on the AFC as well. 16 and five, ATS. Last 21 times he's played an AFC team. He's covered 16 of them. Meanwhile, the Kansas City Chiefs, they've been struggling at home, man. Arrowhead's not what it used to be. One, six and one against the spread the last eight times they played against NFC teams as well. Chiefs, oh and three straight up and against the spread right now at home. They're on a bad home run right now. They're gonna be in tough to win this football game. I expect Alvin Cook to have a big game. I don't fully trust Captain Kirk Cousins on the road, but in Zimmer, I trust. They own the AFC, Zimmer owns non-division opponents. Minnesota wins the football game and then Mahomes comes back next week. In Zimmer, we trust once again, especially against those AFC opponents, get in on Mike Zimmer, get in on the Minnesota Vikings here on Sunday. Code up next game, we get to Miami. The Dolphins are three point dogs at home against the New York Jets. The Adam Gates return to Miami, what do you think? Wow, you know what? I generally have stayed away. I remember when people were all excited about that Washington Miami game just because how bad it was. I didn't have any interest in it. This one I do, get the popcorn out and in fact, they should have flexed this and put it in prime time. I don't know if you guys know this, but quick history lesson. Going back, I think it was 1981, 1982-ish, but the Jets were playing the Dolphins and NBC knew that nobody would care about the game, essentially, and there was a big game with playoff implications on like CBS. So NBC decided to have no announcers for the game. It was the only time ever. It's the only NFL game ever broadcasted. They just put mics on the field and they turned up the public address announcer. So you can hear when it was a first down, et cetera, first down, Dolphins. They probably should have done something similar to this. Maybe they should have had, let a fan participate in the game type of contest, because this is what we have here, but it's so bad, it's good. And really, the New York Jets are now three and a half point road favorites. It was three. Now, listen, whoever is out there, and if you bet the Jets and you move this number to three and a half, my number is 647, Klondike555, please call me, I'll take your action. Entertainment purposes only. All kidding aside, guys, really?  You're betting on the New York Jets?  Secondly, Adam Gase blows. Thirdly, the Jets don't win on the road. They're three and 17 straight up in their last 20 road games. You want to lay points with the Jets? They're one and six against the spread. Even Fireman ad doesn't bet on the Jets when they go on the road. The Miami Dolphins have actually been competitive. They've covered their last three football games and people talk about the Dolphins' tanking. Maybe the organization wants to tank, but the players on the field aren't trying to tank. It's the stupidest thing ever.  You think a player on the court, ice, or field is gonna try to lose a game so the team can draft a player that plays the same position as him to replace him. Right? That makes a lot of sense. If teams are gonna tank, they just put bad players on the field. The bad players are still gonna try. And the Miami Dolphins want this. I, you're gonna trust Adam Gase. Come on, man.  Like, they've got, this game to me, it's amazing as bad as the Dolphins are. I'm getting crazy. I'm getting crazy. I want to run to the ATM right now and take out all my money and bet on the Miami Dolphins. And I know my main man, Frank Stample, is a member of Gang Green. And watch out, you're gonna get Gang Green following this team. But this one's for you, Frank. Give me the fish. The Miami Dolphins who have not won a game all season. These games choice here this Sunday. Jets, J-E-T-S-L-O-S-E, lose, lose, lose. Miami wins. Game goes with the fish. We'll see what happens on Sunday. Give me the points. I'm not saying money like that. We are continuing on one final bet to get to. It's the Los Angeles Chargers at home. Take it on Aaron Rodgers. Aaron Jones of the Green Bay Packers. You like the Chargers in this one. How come? Yeah, that's right. You know why? Because I like it even more with the skepticism in your voice. Yeah, I heard you like the Chargers. Same thing I heard. You like the Cardinals? Really? The Cardinals, all right, all right, yeah, yeah. I like the Cardinals. How'd that work out? Cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching. Man, the Green Bay Packers are good. I think Aaron Rodgers is gonna be your most valuable player this year. He's at about 300 range right now, plus 300 at Fandle. Sometimes you've gotta go with your gut. And you guys know a pretty big trend better, but I'm also a big situational spot better. The Green Bay Packers have been cruising along. The Green Bay Packers had a big game on national television, Sunday night football. They beat the Kansas City Chiefs. Now they have to go back into the AFC West. They have to go into Los Angeles. Now this is gonna be like a home game for the Green Bay Packers. Like make no mistake about it. It holds about 30,000 people or so. Probably gonna be about 28,000 Packer fans. The Packer fans travel better than anybody. You know, all the cold weather markets travel the best. The Green Bay Packers travel the best. Chief fans travel, Bill's fans travel. Seaman College football, Penn State fans. You know, generally these cold weather, die-hard football frenzies, markets. Pittsburgh Steelers, they're really gonna take this stadium over, but whatever, man. Fans in the stands don't win football games. Players on the field do. And I'm going with my gut here. I just don't think that it should be three and a half points. I don't think the Packers should be laying this on the road. The Chargers weren't as good as they were hyped up to be to come into the year. They're not as bad as people are hyping up to be right now over the last couple of weeks. I don't mind the change at Offensive Coordinator with Wiz and Hunt getting the boot. And I'll tell you what, if the Chargers lose, they always lose in like heartbreaking fashion by a single point or by a last second field goal. They either lose by, they either like lose by the other team hitting a field goal or they'll miss a field goal or they'll miss an extra point. Something crazy and strange will happen with the Chargers. But I'm getting three and a half points here. Upsets, upset special will give you the points, but I think the Chargers probably win the game outright anyways. You heard the skepticism in my voice. That's why I don't bet. Games are expert. He likes the Chargers plus the points, even on the money line a little bit. The Chargers to play here on Sunday. That's gonna do it for us here in the Fando. Hurry up. Good luck with your bets this week. Have some fun, win some money. We'll see you back here on Monday to preview Monday Night Football. Have a great weekend and enjoy week nine.


So last week on the show, we talked about Dave Chappelle's transphobic and Netflix special and the conversation that ensued afterwards transpired exactly as I expected it to. You had a lot of right wingers like Ben Shapiro, Laura Ingram, Stephen Crowder, all rallying around Dave Chappelle. I wonder why. And on top of that, trans people who dared to speak up were accused of being sensorians who were supporting cancel culture. But I think it's pretty clear that if cancel culture had any power, wouldn't this instance where there's supposedly so much outrage lead to the cancellation of Dave Chappelle? No, you can't cancel Dave Chappelle. In fact, he commented that if this is what cancel culture is, then, you know, it's not so bad. He likes it. Now, transgender Netflix employees staged a walkout. But before I show you what happened, I do want to share their demands, because contrary to popular belief, the official trans employee resource group from Netflix, they weren't calling for the special to be removed. There are some individual employees who are calling for it to be removed. And that was the most controversial ask. People thought that trans people were making, but not all trans people agreed that it should be removed. But the demands made by the trans Netflix employees who staged a walkout, they were actually just asking for better representation and respect within their company from their employer. So Zoe Schiffer of The Verge explains the trans employee resource group at Netflix has released a list of demands for the company ahead of Wednesday's walkout. We want the company to adopt measures in the areas of content investment, employee relations and safety and harm reduction, all of which are necessary to avoid future instances of platforming transphobia and hate speech. Employees wrote in a press release, which has not yet been made public, but it was supplied to The Verge. The news comes after weeks of controversy due to Netflix executives continuing to support Dave Chappelle and his company, Special The Closer, which many LGBTQ people and allies have criticized as transphobic. Last week, Netflix fired a leader of the trans ERG, that's the employee resource group, who was helping to organize the walkout. The company said this worker had leaked confidential information. Internally, that reasoning has been disputed. While the conversation has become mired in a culture wars dispute of recensorship and hate speech, none of the demands involve taking down the comedy special. Employees want Netflix to allow the trans ERG to take on a bigger role in internal conversations surrounding potentially harmful content, hire trans and non-binary executives and eliminate imagery of transphobic content in the office. Now, I feel like all of these demands here are totally reasonable. If you are an employee, you should demand respect from your employer. That employer-employee relationship is inherently exploitative. So I think that them stating that we demand better from our employer, I think that that's absolutely expected. I mean, I support worker rights and this is a worker rights issue and trans rights, that's also a worker rights issue.  You have to feel as if you're listened to. And that's not the case for a lot of workers around the country. But I absolutely support these workers saying we demand to actually be heard by our employer. Listen, LGBTQ people, when they work, oftentimes, even if you're in a state where you are protected from getting fired because you're gay, that doesn't necessarily protect you. I mean, you could be in a situation where you have homophobic bosses who are explicitly creating a hostile work environment.  They could fire you.   But this is something that trans people, gay people, non-binary people have to deal with. So worker rights also includes LGBTQ plus rights. So I think that what they're asking for here is incredibly reasonable. Now, the walkout did, in fact, occur and people decided to show up and protest the worker walkout. So as the Hill reports, signs from the protesters reading transphobia is not a joke and trans lives matter were met with others on the opposite side, saying Netflix don't cancel free speech and jokes are funny. Now, I don't know if non-Netflix employees showed up to stand in solidarity with trans-Netflix workers, but it feels kind of odd if it's not the case, if that's not the case, that you would call employees staging a walkout, requesting demands from their employer, protesters, when this is very clearly a worker rights issue, it's akin to a strike. But either way, it's bizarre that you have workers making a demand from their employer and then people protesting them. I mean, imagine if there was a Nabisco strike and Nabisco factory workers were making specific demands and you had protesters show up and say, well, we love Oreos. OK, great, you can still love that. But we're talking about us and our employment with this company in particular. So you're kind of being an attention horror by trying to distract from the real issue that we're getting at here. But having said that, though, there was a viral video from what is perceived as a clash between these pro Dave Chappelle protesters and Netflix employees, and there's one moment in particular that's going viral that the right is using to further demonize trans people, because, of course, they're going to be portrayed as the bad guys in this situation because, you know, Dave Chappelle, he's incredibly famous. He has millions of fans, so people just they don't care about trans rights. They just want their comedian to not be quote unquote canceled. But you're going to see why this particular video is making the rounds online, getting so many clicks. Hey, so that was difficult to watch. It was cringe all around the guy who was yelling. I like Dave. I like jokes. He was cringe worthy. The lady who was screaming at him was cringe worthy. It was really uncomfortable to watch. But right wingers are using that clip as evidence that trans people who are making these demands from Netflix, their employer, they're just overly sensitive. They're SJW sensorians and they don't support free speech. And look, I'll say I don't think that that guy should have taken that sign away from that guy. I think that that was the wrong move.   He's just trying to make a mockery of what these workers are trying to do. But when you take the sign away from him, then you're kind of giving him what he wants, because then you saw he cried out, oh, they don't support my free speech.  When that's not what this is about. Again, this is a worker rights issue. And for the particular employees at Netflix who spoke out and said that they want the special removed, you can disagree with that. That's that's fine. But that's not the purpose of the walkouts. The actual group who created this walkout in Netflix, they said that they want these specific demands and removing the closer was not one of them. But I mean, this entire conversation, it really just shows how trans people are not respected in the United States, because all it takes is one celebrity to say something bad about trans people. And then everyone rallies around that celebrity to defend them when they receive criticism. It's the same thing that happened with Tulsi Gabbard when she basically came out as a turf, a lot of people criticized Tulsi Gabbard. And then what happened? Well, trans people dealt with the brunt of that.  They were saying that they were unreasonable to challenge Tulsi Gabbard. And now the same thing is happening with Dave Chappelle. People who are criticizing him, they're the ones receiving backlash. Raveana, she is a great leftist Twitch streamer. She criticized Dave Chappelle. And what happened?  She's defending trans people because she's an ally. And that's not representative of the totality of the Dave Chappelle. They're supporters, but it just goes to show you that any time there's this conversation that takes place, it doesn't take place equally. There's one side who has an advantage. The celebrity, the wealthy person and the marginalized people. They have the disadvantage. And if they dare to speak up, it's lose, lose for them. They look like they are SJWs who are in support of cancel culture.  We don't respect your identity. Just transphobic harassment and bullying. And it's it's just really discouraging to see. Now, a lot of folks who defended Dave Chappelle, they'll say, well, look, you just haven't you haven't seen the full special. But after I watched most of the special that part in particular about trans issues, I watched like 55 to 60 percent of the special. It's even worse than the article that I read portrayed it as saying, I'm team turf is absolutely bad. But what he did that was so nefarious is he not only tried to pit marginalized groups against each other, but on top of that, he tried to hide behind his transphobia by shielding himself with his trans friend. And that's incredibly gross. First of all, putting marginalized groups against each other. That's what bigots do. That's exactly what they want to do. They utilize this divisive tactic all the time. And to try to hide behind his transphobia by saying, I have a trans friend. It's not very compelling. Second of all, when you talk about how much you love and value your trans friend and you end by misgendering her. It's just it feels really slimy. It feels really disingenuous and also implying that the people, the trans people specifically who criticized Daphne because she stood up for him after his last transphobic special, that they're the reasons why she killed herself, which is horrible. I mean, understand what Dave Chappelle is doing here. It's basically a propaganda tactic. He's trying to make it seem as if any and all criticism of him is unreasonable and illegitimate.  That's extremely gross and disingenuous. And all around the special was just bad. It wasn't funny, just putting aside his issue with the LGBTQ plus community, which he clearly has, it wasn't a good special. It was dad jokes.   That was funny in 2016, 2017. But in 2021, we've all kind of moved on and we're making different jokes about Mike Pence and Donald Trump now. So he's just out of touch, but he didn't really have to try because I'm pretty sure that with the contract that he had with Netflix, he was already getting getting paid millions of dollars. So he didn't even do the bare minimum. And he just did what right wingers wanted him to do. So it's no surprise that they're defending him now after the shitty transphobic special. But, you know, hopefully when the dust settles, people can look back at this moment with a clearer mind and realize that ultimately the outcome, even if you don't believe Dave Chappelle was transphobic, which you just you're you're fooling yourself if you believe that's the case. But ultimately, I think people are going to realize that this led to transphobia because anyone who dares to speak up who's trans and say, listen, this hurts me. They're the ones who are getting attacked immediately.  You're too easily offended. You support cancel culture. It's just it's sickening. And Dave Chappelle did all of this and now he has to live with that. And he might think that it's OK right now. But long term, if he is as smart as we all thought he was, which I believe that's the case or I hope that's the case, he'll soon realize that this was horrible and this isn't going to age well because it already has not aged well. So, you know, that's pretty much all that I have to say about this.  I support trans people. And if you don't like what I'm saying about Dave Chappelle, one, stop being so easily offended to stop trying to cancel me. I thought you were against cancel culture. And three, I don't care. Dislike the video unsubscribe. I'm not going to tell you what you want to hear. I'm going to share my opinion and I absolutely side with trans people over Dave Chappelle and over you. And if you don't like that, that's fine. So dislike a way that actually helps the channel in terms of giving me engagement, helping with the algorithm, I don't care. I'm not going to censor myself because I'm afraid of pushback. If I'm getting this much pushback or people are getting this much pushback for daring to challenge what is explicitly transphobic, then that tells us that we have to push back even harder because we just have a lot of further ways to go when it comes to trans rights than I initially thought. And that's sad, but I'm going to just ramp up and advocate for them harder because they're human beings and they deserve respect and equality.


It took a leap of faith and a strong dose of peer pressure for BU triple jumper David Aldo Adara to join his high school track team I was actually going to get on the bus to go home And those two friends that I talked to literally dragged me to track practice was a track try outs And that's how I got started Now the 2016 Patriot League champ in the long and triple jump events has his name in the BU history books I looked the record board I always looked at the record board coming in and I thought to myself I could do that That moment came in February when he smashed the 31 year old indoor triple jump record I've come to realize that some of my best jumps are just when I just get on the runway Just jump and not think and let everything I've done just come out and that's what happened He's extremely talented. He's very calm and he makes adjustments very quickly David's success story reminds his teammates that there's always room for growth to see him come out and like break a record But just being consistent and being persistent It just gave me like that hope that there is light at the end of the tunnel With the outdoor track season just beginning David now hopes to break the outdoor triple jump record But there is a bigger Olympic size dream on his mind Another thing down the line is to see if I can jump for Nigeria in the Olympics So that would be pretty amazing Ultimately nothing is more important to David than his relationship with God who joins him for each and every leap he takes in his life It is God that guards me with strength that makes my way perfect He makes my feet like hind feet like a deer's feet and he sets me upon my high places


If you're already selling cars, you need to watch this. This is something that's going to blow your mind. Hey guys, what's up? It's Andy. So the common question I get asked is did car salesmen make good money? Well, you're going to find out the answer during this video. And I want to tell you something real quick. If you're currently not selling cars and you want to get in the automotive space, right now it's on fire, OK? Right now the average commission in a car dealership is about $800 to $900 a car. It is through the roof. And I said average. Some stores are up to $1,500. Wow. So has it ever been better to get in the car business? Never. It's phenomenal. We're a little light on inventory, but the commissions are through the roof. It's a beautiful, beautiful place to be. And if you're selling cars right now and you're not earning what you're worth in this video, I'm going to tell you how to become a high top 1% earner. So here's what's important to you. No degree needed. No degree, OK? What means is you don't need college. You don't need college to get into the automotive industry. Also another deal is, is that look, you don't have to have any special skills. You just got to care about people. By the way, if you don't care about people, don't get in the automotive space. Now a lot of people say, hey, Andy, I think a lot of car salesmen like to rip people off. No, they don't. Look, if I treat you like a million dollars, I deserve to get paid all the money. I'm going to explain this to you. Anywhere in life has higher markups than in the car industry. So the car industry doesn't have very big markups. When you go buy a t-shirt, a t-shirt has like 500% markup. A car may have like 10% markup. You feel me?  That's all. But the markup and all the other products in the world right now are totally different. But the automotive industry is on fire because we sell something that 100% of the people have to have. So if you're watching this right now and you want to know, so what's the baby? Do automotive sales pros make a lot of money? I'll say yes. Right now, the trained ones can earn between $200k a year to $700k a year. Trained. Now, look, I want you to notice something. Out of this entire video, I want you to focus on this word right here, OK? The word trained.  So if you're watching this right now and you're like, hey, man, I'm not earning that kind of money, let me explain something. All you need is training. That's it, OK? And if you want to get into the business, you may say, Andy, I'm not a great speaker. Honestly, I don't know how to communicate very well with people. I will explain this. That is a skill, and that can be learned with training. There's a couple of important things that really make a great salesperson, OK? Number one, energy. This right here, if I could borrow my energy, I could sell it for trillions, OK? I learned when I was young that a lot of sales pros are like a confident sleep dead in dealerships. So I just said, hey, if I did the exact opposite, when people came in to deal with me, they'd probably get in a pretty good mood because I'm in a good mood, I got a great attitude. And if I got a great attitude and they got one, there's a pretty good chance what I asked for their business that they'll say yes. Have you ever wanted to buy something in a bad mood? Probably not, right? Notice, most salespeople don't get their customers in great moods. Their customers come in, they're thinking about buying something, they're serious about the money, the salesperson is serious. All of a sudden, the whole transaction's serious, and nothing happens. I want you to think about this. Salesperson goes out, he says hi to somebody, he's jacked up, rock and roll, and have fun. Hey, how you guys doing, beautiful family? Welcome to the store, how can I help you today? Welcome to my home. What do you got going on, man? Hey, awesome meeting you guys. Just having a good time reminds them of a friend. There's familiarity there. They go through the process, they have fun. He increases the energy in the state the entire time. They mirror his energy.  They do business with him for the rest of their life because they like him. Guys, that's all it's about. And by the way, can you earn a lot of dough? More money than you know what to do with. I'm gonna explain this to you. Guys, time and experience means nothing. Look, you see this right here? Time and experience. Most businesses say to become an expert, you have to have at least 10,000 hours. That's how they require you to be an expert in the field. Matter of fact, the automotive industry changes so much every year that most of the people that have 10,000 hours, we call them dinosaurs. They're unwilling to change. They're not like a sponge. They have a fixed mindset, not a growth mindset. So they don't stay up to speed with what the shift is and guess what happened? Those people with 10,000 hours aren't usually the people that make the most money. A lot of the time it's the new people that are getting in because they got a new fire, they got new drive, they got new energy and they're happy. They're motivated. They're driven to do well in life. And they believe that the automotive space is their opportunity and it's their way out to do really good in life. With no degree and no special skills. But I will tell you this. If you're wondering right now, hey Andy, I need the ability to make really good money. Should going into automotive sales be something that I do and quit my current job I have now? I'll just say this, okay? No risk, no reward. I have an entrepreneurial heart. You know what that means? I can start over at zero at the beginning of each month.  I tried average, it made me sick, I hated it.  You're okay having a mortgage payment. You're okay not having a lot of money in the bank. You're okay not going on vacation. Look, don't get in the car business. Stay with the normal job and keep a salary. But if you'd like to have a million cash in the bank, couple million, couple hundred thousand, you'd like to have your home paid off, titles to your cars, right? In the safe, paid off, free and clear. Be able to go on vacation as much as you like. Get in the sales game because if you love sales, you love income, it's that easy, okay? So I wanna say this to you. If you're thinking about getting in the automotive industry, I would highly recommend doing it. If you're willing to do one thing and that's train. And by the way, if you're watching this video and you are in and you're not getting the kind of results that I talked about or you wanna go to the next level or you're thinking about getting in, shoot me a text message<PHONE_NUMBER>. God, shoot me a text right now. You'll see it below,<PHONE_NUMBER>. I'll send you over a little free training packet. Check it out. It'll help you level up your game. See you guys soon.


He creates a lot of chaos and political instability I get someone's instinct to dislike Donald Trump and to not want him to be president. Trust me I feel it too. I don't like Donald Trump. I want him gone as soon as possible With that being said though, I feel as if it's really important and I shouldn't have to say this that we don't go out of our way to rehabilitate the destructive legacies of past presidents who were objectively worse than Donald Trump So I understand that like, you know, Donald Trump may make you yearn for the days when we had a more Normal president at least when it comes to their mental faculties and ability to govern and just acting like an adult However, you don't have to normalize someone like George W. Bush Just so, you know, the juxtaposition between Trump and Bush seems that much more absurd You can just say Trump is bad and not rehabilitate George W. Bush But unfortunately that is what a lot of liberals namely liberal elites are doing in order to resist Donald Trump and make him look bad They're trying to make it seem as if Bush wasn't that bad What an actuality Bush was far more destructive than Donald Trump I'm still holding a grudge against Ellen who used to be you know an LGBTQ plus hero to me Because she invited George W. Bush on her show and they were dancing. They were getting all buddy buddy You know, he gave her a kiss on the cheek and that was really destructive She basically told all of her viewers that George W. Bush wasn't so bad because look at Donald Trump now So we should have been thankful for the days of George W. Bush That was problematic, but you know, I chalked it up to alright. She's just a political She doesn't know shit about politics, but that wasn't a one-off because over the weekend There was an image of her that went viral hanging out with George W. Bush at a football game You know, it was as if 2001 through 2009 never happened I guess she is not recalling what happened and how he attacked her Identity as president and on top of that actress Rosie O'Donnell tweeted out support for Bush saying how comforting to see a real president Never thought his image would move me.   Donald Trump is bad George Bush is good and whatever problems you had with George W. Bush It pales in comparison to the issues that we have with Donald Trump Well, guess what?  He doesn't like you.   This is the man that signed the Patriot Act into law which eroded the 4th Amendment Okay, it wrote in the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution He was the architect of the drone wars that Obama ended up expanding which led to thousands of civilians dying in Pakistan Yemen Afghanistan Somalia Iraq This is the man who has the blood of 1 million dead Iraqis on his hands his regime change effort there Literally catalyzed a bloody civil war and we are still fucking there and you're saying this is a great person This is a real president.  What is wrong with you?   I'm gonna play a little clip because I guess that liberals who are older than me who should remember this more clearer Need a history lesson. This is what he said in a radio address about gay marriage You wanted a constitutional amendment to ban your marriage Ellen today I want to explain why I support the marriage protection amendment and why I'm urging Congress to pass it and send it to the states for ratification Marriage is the most enduring and important human institution honored and encouraged in all cultures and by every religious faith Ages of experience have taught us that the commitment of a husband and a wife to love and to serve one another Promotes the welfare of children and the stability of society Marriage cannot be cut off from its cultural religious and natural roots without weakening this good influence on society Government by recognizing and protecting marriage serves the interests of all In our free society people have the right to choose how they live their lives And in a free society decisions about such a fundamental social institution as marriage should be made by the people Not by the courts The American people have spoken clearly on this issue both through their representatives and at the ballot box in 1996 Congress approved the Defense of Marriage Act by overwhelming bipartisan majorities in both the House and Senate and President Clinton signed it into law Unfortunately activist judges and some local officials have made an aggressive attempt to redefine marriage in recent years Since 2004 state courts in Washington, California, Maryland and New York have overturned laws protecting marriage in those states and In Nebraska a federal judge overturned a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage These court decisions could have an impact on our whole nation The Defense of Marriage Act declares that no state is required to accept another state's definition of marriage If that act is overturned by activist courts Then marriages recognized in one city or state might have to be recognized as marriages everywhere else That would mean that every state would have to recognize marriages redefined by judges in Massachusetts or local officials in San Francisco No matter what their own laws or state constitutions say this national question requires a national solution and on an issue of such Profound importance that solution should come from the people not the courts a Constitutional amendment will put a decision that is critical to American families and American society in the hands of the American people Which is exactly where it belongs Democracy not court orders should decide the future of marriage in America. I Mean what more do you need? What more do you need? Has he even made a public apology? For saying that that he wanted a constitutional amendment So same-sex couples could never ever be able to get married. Has he ever apologized for that? Has he ever at least even showed like an ounce of remorse for all of the Iraqis that he murdered? Both directly and indirectly I Don't think so. This is what American politics has devolved into where because we dislike Donald Trump We're going to normalize and rehabilitate the destructive legacy of a murderer Who should be rotting in prison right now the fact that he is free?


A 76 year old man in Seattle has just vandalized an Asian-American museum based on the fact that Chinese have tortured me for 14 years. That was his reasoning. But David, what does that even mean? What's going on? Craig, we have been neighbors for 14 years. I thought we had a great relationship. You like my potstickers. Um, Andrew, on Thursday, Craig Milne, 76 years old, allegedly yelled racist statements and smashed nine windows of the historic museum using a sledgehammer. Andrew, he has been arrested and charged with a hate crime and put on $30,000 bail. Wow. All right, everybody, we're going to talk about what does that mean? What are some theories? What are some speculations about this guy? Why did you do it? Please hit that like button and check out other episodes of the Hop Hop Boys. David, this one hits particularly close to home because this happened in Seattle at the Wing Luke Museum, which is a famous Asian-American museum, which we went to growing up to the old location. And then when they remodeled, we went to that one too. Yeah, we got to also talk about why this news is going so viral right now. But real quick, Andrew, we have a word from our sponsor, Smila, get it at SmilaSauce.com, from Sichuan to Sicily. This is unlike any other finishing oil that you could find on the market right now. Made with real truffle and made in America. Andrew, what did we do to him for 14 years? I mean, he's so specific about the exact era that he was tormented and tortured. Well, you know, I have to think, you know, I work with Craig for some time and back in maybe 2009, 14 years ago, I remember something happening. I brought a lunch to work and I warmed it up in the microwave, but it was kind of smelly, you know, unfortunately. Oh, you brought the fish. And Craig, I guess Craig complained about it. So maybe that's the reason. No, I'm just kidding guys. Honestly, first of all, I in a way feel bad for the guy, but I'm glad he's in jail because he's clearly tormented in his mind and he's clearly mentally ill, which that is happening a lot.  Maybe there was a Chinese person in his life that represented something bad. I don't know. Obviously, it's much, much more likely it is macroeconomic like industry driven factors possibly due to globalization and outsourcing. Andrew, let's be honest here. He looks like Donald Trump. He's wearing a golf polo that's relatively clean in a golf Nike hat. This is not like a fiend on the street addicted to substances. I'm not saying he doesn't put got some mental issues or some sort of old person muscle atrophy in his brain. But I think that that's why partially this is going so viral, right? Honestly, he is dressed like a typical Northwest engineer dad, like he almost worked out Boeing for some time with kind of the oversized does he look like he watches Fox News? Be honest. Yeah, yeah. Listen, I think he has like air monarchs on and like stuff like he looks like a total dad.  But you know, so I think it's sad to see even guys that look normal and had jobs and had lives kind of go off the rails like this, you know, because it's really unexpected. But I guess, David, what are some speculations? Well, a lot of people were speculating, did he have a Chinese ex-wife? However, people did the research on Craig Milne and he had a white ex-wife that divorced him. Now, this is just speculation. Maybe his ex-wife left him for a Chinese guy. I mean, I'm just kidding. That's probably not the reason. Honestly, probably why couldn't it be the reason that happens all the time? No, it could happen. I'm just saying he could have had Chinese neighbors, right? Possibly. For 14 years, for 14 years.   I think a lot of it probably is more industry specific. I'm going to go ahead and just guess he was part of like expediting or shipping or maybe maybe he was in toy manufacturing. Who knows? But that actually died in America way more than 14 years ago. Anyway, guys, let's get into the comment section. Make sure you like, subscribe, turn on your notifications. Somebody said some people are just so sad and miserable. They need to put that energy somewhere else that will actually help make the world a better place. Why do you think it seems like in 2023, Andrew, is it just online news? It seems like people are channeling their frustration not in a constructive way. Yeah, no, no. I think there's a lot of older generation, particularly white people, but not all white people, obviously, but just there's an older generation who's very frustrated, who the, you know, the world changed very fast on them. There's a lot of media.  And it's not necessarily especially Facebook and it's not necessarily like a real news either. It could be misinformation too. And that can just kind of get to you.  Listen, I'm glad. I mean, in a way like I'm glad he didn't hurt a person because that taking a sledgehammer to a person would have killed somebody. I guess he wanted to knock down what he saw as a image or a statue representing Asians or Chinese, right, right, right. Somebody said he probably looks like a lot of MAGA commenters on Yahoo News. Yeah, that's an interesting comment. That's actually really funny. That's actually why I like reading Yahoo News comments to be honest, because it offers a different perspective that's very unmillennial, very uninternet generation.  And there was a lot of basically talk from people who are either middle right or on the right politically. And we're saying that how come only white people get charged with hate crimes? Like in the sense of like it seems like that the public opinion is easier to that it's just like an easier play.  They have to be yelling out hateful words towards a group while they're in the act. Right, you know, literally, you have to be saying very hateful racial things while you're doing the Chinese and that was caught on camera. So they know Andy also admitted it to admitted to it. So now they that's why being a hate crime, dude, whether or not it's deemed as a hate crime. It's out of hate. You know what I mean? Actually, his exact words were the Chinese have been tormenting me and torturing me for 14 years. I regret nothing that I did today. Yeah, so I'm glad he's in jail. Yeah, somebody said it was about jobs. They took our jobs. Interestingly enough, Andrew, that was actually the same case with Vincent Chin. In the 90s, a lot of people were saying this, the Japanese economy was super charged and taking a lot of commerce away from America. Yeah, economic sense, right? Yeah. Somebody said, well, a lot of dumb, old white men like Trump and Biden are ruining most of our lives, but that doesn't justify breaking in the windows of a sizzler's or a Morton steakhouse to damage rich, old white guys. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Characterizing sizzlers with I mean, I also think it's part of it. He felt comfortable doing it in Chinatown because he thought, you know, Chinatown's not known for, you know, repercussions and like, you know, there's not like a Chinese gangster that's going to pop out of the side and check him for it. So he just figured he was just yeah, he was free to do it.  Yeah, people feel like they can push the buttons of Asians and pick on Asians extra for sure. For sure. 100%. That is 10,000% true. Honestly, somebody said, so the city will go after this, which I agree with is a no brainer, but not other crimes that happen on a daily basis such as brazen auto theft, assault, drug use, drug dealing, et cetera, et cetera. And this kind of got into like a, okay, people are, they're just going to prosecute this guy because it's easy to prosecute this guy, but they're going to let like a bunch of other stuff go. Right. Right. Right. Yeah. To be honest, I mean, it goes to political optics and stuff like that. For sure it plays a part in it. Guys, you'd have to say everything is in 2023 is like this. Somebody in this white guy said before condemning this guy, understand that he probably lived in a time where the Chinese government was more harsher than it is now. The greed of the U.S. companies moving over the cheap labor and the quality eliminated many jobs here and probably caused a lot of loss of his income. Sometimes it's just a matter of perspective. I'm not saying he was right, but I kind of understand. Dang. Yeah. No.  I mean, there's also a lot of people can empathize with a lot of criminals, like depending on what their motive is.  I can see with human nature being a man. I can see why he's frustrated. Obviously I don't agree with what he did. But yes, I get, I like a lot of people would say that, you know, right, right, right. I mean, the point, the truth is, man, I think a lot of people can understand that a lot of people have bad lives and they got put in bad situations, which lead them to make a into like a spiral of bad choices. But at the same time, I'm like, so what? Just because we can kind of understand the motivations behind something, we have to excuse it. That doesn't even make any sense because then every criminal globally could say that I had a bad life. I got dealt bad cards. Andrew, let's just get into our takeaways. I think that this story went so viral because it is a guy who just doesn't even look like he would do this, right? Yeah. Yeah. It's not like he doesn't seem like a homeless crack. Right. This is just not a fiend on the street. Just like throwing a rock in a window, right? This is like an old guy wearing golf clothing. Yeah. Yeah. It kind of represents a lot of America, to be honest. And I think that's why a lot of people are looking at it like, whoa, it's just going to happen more with like 67 year old white guys because there's a lot of them in this country. Yeah. That's true. I mean, I think it's almost like people are having extrapolating a lot more like macro takeaways like people are like representing archetypes rather than just like, was it really that bad as it was overall, man? I just wish that people would jump out of their news loops and their negativity loops that they're in that you can get sucked into on like, especially on social media. Obviously, there is real stuff going on in this world. America versus China and a rivalry of economics and intellectual property and spying and all this stuff. And so I guess there's that real stuff. But then, man, I don't know if people are mentally ill, you can't really stop them from consuming media. So I think that's the issue. Yeah.   He just stayed and waited for 50 minutes. So he totally could have got away. And then a lot of people were saying, man, this is just a commentary on how understaffed and underserved the police are doing their job in Seattle. Interesting. Yeah. But then obviously, do you put the blame on people defunding the police or do you put the blame on the police department still being inept or just, you know, is it about the distribution of resources? There's a lot of discussions to be had. I just think this everybody needs to get on the right page. I guess to address like any sort of like mental health issues, you know, and it goes to show you and the mental health issues are not just limited to like people who are really poor. Yeah. Yeah. It could be older people who had, you know, a long lengthy industry based career or even had a pension. Maybe he lost his pension, you know, to whatever. I don't know if China took his pension. I don't see how that could have happened. But yeah, you know what I mean? So yeah, I mean, I guess you guys let us know in the comments down below.  It's up to $100,000 in damages and who I mean, he could hurt it. He could hurt a human next, you know what I mean? So I guess, what does this all mean? I want to end on this though. And or the director of the Wing Luke Museum, I got to provide his perspective. He said, I don't want the news only showing the bad things that are happening to us overshadow that we got a lot of positive programs in the community to help, you know, disenfranchise people and other things like that. So like we said, sometimes the news cycle is more going to emphasize negative news because it gets more click through rate. Let us know what you guys think in the comment section below of this whole incident of Craig Milne, you know, attacking the Wing Luke Museum in Seattle. Keep it civil. Until next time, we'll hop out, boys. We out. Peace.


Now that you've seen me deal with inequalities and pencil and paper, let's use Python and we're gonna make our lives a lot easier. I've opened my new notebook, I've called it lecture nine, as you can see on the top left, let's go to the top right and hit connect so we can connect to the Google service and they can spin up an instance of Python on their side. Now as per usual, I'm gonna start with all the functionality that I want to import from the Sympy package, I'm gonna specify them. The other ones that we've seen before functions like init underscore printing, symbols, EQ and solve, but for inequalities, I've got a few more that I want to import. I've done it on two lines, you don't have to do that, you can just keep on adding commas and adding all the functionality that you require. So I've got ABS, reduce underscore inequalities, reduce underscore abs underscore inequalities, inequalities, poly and solve poly inequality. So let's import all of those and first of all, of course, we're gonna call the init underscore printing function because we want nice mathematical type setting when we execute Sympy code. First thing I wanna talk to you about comparison operators in Python. Look at that first one, it's an equality, it says it's three equal to three, that might seem slightly silly, but it is very valid code and you see the double equal symbols. That asks the question in Python, is the left hand side equal to the right hand side? So what you would see in mathematics with a single equal symbol, but remember in a computer language, a single equal symbol is an assignment operator, so we use double equal symbols here. Let's execute that line of code and we can see the result is true. It says the left hand side is indeed equal to the right hand side. These are what we call Boolean questions, statements that can either be true or false. There's nothing else is possible. So have a look at the second one, I'm asking is three less than or equal to three? Well, it's certainly not less than, but it is equal to, so that's definitely going to return it true as well. Next one is just a simple less than, is three less than four? Yes, indeed it is, we'll see true. Is three greater than or equal to three? Yes, that is so, so we see another true. Now just a simple greater than is four greater than three? Yes, that'll be so. And then this final one is three not equal to, so we see the exclamation mark equal, you combine those two, it says is three not equal to four? Well, it isn't, so we have true as well. So I'm gonna task you with setting up some of these that you might return a false value for your statement. Now though, let's carry on and talk about inequalities. There's our first inequality. We have a left hand side and the right hand side, but we're saying that the left hand side is less than the right hand side. So calculate, we'll solve at least four x, three x minus four is less than five. Now first of all, we've got to create a mathematical variable x using the symbol x, you can see it there, and I'm assigning it to the computer variable named x, let's execute that. Now here we see a function that we've never seen before, reduce underscore inequalities. So I've got three times x minus four less than five, comma my second argument x, I wanna solve for x, so we're not using the solve function here.  So and x is less than three. So you can clearly see x is between negative infinity all the way up to three, but it's not including that three. Now what you can do is just call the simplify method, which is what I've done here. So I've just had the previous line of code and I've said dot simplify, and let's see what happens. Now we see it's much simpler. It just says it's less than three. And of course that means it goes off to negative infinity. So it's this little simplification. I just wanna show you, if you create your mathematical variable x using the symbol x and assigning it to the computer variable x, but you specify x now to be a real number. Here we didn't do that. Here we are gonna specify x to be a real number. If I now use this exact same line of code, I'm using it right here. Now we are gonna see the simplified result, x is less than three. So it just depends, remember how we specified our mathematical variable x. I want to show you another function, solve underscore poly underscore inequality. So as long as you have a polynomial, you can also use this function. It's constructed very differently. Look at this. I have a first argument, which is a function, a poly with an uppercase p that actually creates an object. So that's gonna be poly. I've got three times x minus four minus five. Now what happened there? Well, if I go back to the original problem, I had to make sure that the right-hand side was a zero. So I had to subtract five from both sides. And then I'm only entering the left-hand side. The second argument of this poly function is x. I want a polynomial in x. So all of that becomes the first argument to the solve underscore poly underscore inequality function. The second argument, so comma, inside of quotation marks, I have got the less than symbol because that's what my problem was originally. Let's have a look at this result. And now it's going to do this. It puts inside of square brackets. Now those square brackets is just telling us that Python is creating a list of values. So that's got nothing to do with a mathematics. What we have to look at is inside, I see parentheses, so it's open intervals from negative infinity all the way up to three, not including three. Something else I wanna show you with these inequalities. Look at this. I've got my original problem there. Three times x minus four is less than five. I'm putting that inside of a set of parentheses to create one object. And then I'm calling the subs method. Now the subs method, remember, method is just a function, takes two arguments. The first one is x comma, what do I want to substitute x for? Well, I want to substitute x equals two. Why have I chosen two? Well, if I look at my interval, it says, well, take any value as long as it's less than three. Well, two is less than three, so let's check it out. So I'm substituting into this inequality, the value for x, and that's the value that I'm substituting as two. And if we execute that, we see indeed that is true. Now let's substitute a value that's not in our interval of our solution. So three is not included. Remember, this is an open interval. So if I substitute three into that equation, I should say into that inequality, let's be sure about that. It's an inequality. I get the result, which is false. So let's solve this inequality. Minus two times x minus four is less than five. Now I'm going to just use the reduce underscore inequalities. Remember, I can just write up my problem as is comma, and I want this to be solved for x. And now I see that negative three over two is less than x. Or if I read it from the right-hand side, it's x is larger than three over two. Now once again, I can use simplify. You know, just add the simplify method. And all it's gonna do now is just gonna swap those around. So we read it properly. The way that we would expect it, x is larger than one and a half or three over two. Here's my solve underscore poly underscore inequality again. I can do this because we have a polynomial here. There's my poly function again. So you've got to look at what we had to do. We had to bring that five over to the other side. So we had to subtract five from both sides. And I'm only putting the left-hand side there, then comma x. And then there's my less than symbol as the second argument to the solve underscore poly underscore inequality function. So you really have to pay attention when you wanna use this function. And look at that. We see this open interval from three over two up to positive infinity. Again, please ignore these square brackets. Python is just using that to tell me this is a list of possible solutions. There's only one interval of solution. And that's this open interval from three over two all the way to infinity. Once again, we can use the subs method. Look at that. I'm substituting x equals two into my problem. So there's my problem inside of parentheses using the subs method. And I wanna substitute two as far as x is concerned. And again, two is in my solution interval because this goes from one and a half to infinity. And so certainly two isn't that interval. And I get a result that is true. Now let's use a value for x that's not inside of this interval of solutions. One certainly is not in there. So let's use that, substitute that and now I'm gonna get back a false. So you can always verify your results. Now let's do this example. Show the inequality or at least solve the inequality x squared minus four x is larger than negative three. Let's just do that poly. Remember we use poly as an argument. Let's just see what it does. Now yet you can see it once again, I've taken that negative three. I've added three to both sides so that I only have the left hand side of the inequality.  And I have to set a domain. And the domain I'm setting is uppercase rr inside of quotation marks. So that's a string and you see this. It's a poly, it's x squared minus four x plus three in the variable x and the domain is the real numbers. That's all that that poly is gonna do for us. So let's pass that as first argument to the solve underscore poly underscore inequality function. My second argument is the greater than symbol which is what I wanted for this problem. And if we solve this, we see that we have two solutions and that's what I mean. Python is gonna use the square brackets to denote this as a list of possible values, possible solutions and the first one is this open interval and the second one is that open interval. So it's all the way from negative infinity to one, not including, and then from three all the way to infinity. Let's use subs. Now here I'm gonna use negative four because certainly negative four is within this lower interval. And if I do that, I'm gonna get a true. Let's substitute a value which is in this open interval from three to infinity. Let's use four there. That's gonna give me a true as well. But now let's use one that's not in the solution. So certainly from one to three, that's not nothing there is included. So let's just use two as an example. If I substitute x equals two, I get a false. So let's do this inequality, x squared minus one divided by x plus three is less than or equal to zero. Now what I'm gonna do, I'm gonna use the reduce inequalities, reduce underscore inequalities function. I've got x squared minus one in the numerator divided by x plus three in denominator and I'm using parentheses here, I have to. Otherwise I'm gonna run into problems because I've got division and I've got subtraction and addition there. So I just wanna make sure that my order of medical operations are understood. So I'm saying that's less than or equal to zero and then I want to solve this or reduce this for x and I'm using the simplify method. So you can have a look at that code and we can see this result. Now this is fairly complicated. Look at this. It says that x is larger than equal to negative one and x is less than or equal to one. So it's on that interval from negative one to one. And then we see this symbol. So it's a little upside down symbol and that's the or symbol and that says or x is less than negative three. So it's gotta be between negative one and one inclusive or it's gotta be less than negative three. So let's have a look at a couple of these. Certainly zero is in this first interval. So let's run that as a substitute. So that works out for us. Let's have something that's less than negative three. Let's make it negative four and we substitute that. That's also true. And now let's use something that's not in our intervals. So it's only something like negative two is not between negative one and one and it's not less than negative three. So that should return a false. So once again, we just verifying our results. Let's talk about solving absolute value problems. Now this can be a little tricky in some pie. So let's have a look at it. I've got the absolute value of x minus three equals five and I wanna solve that for x. Now if I wanna print it to the screen I'm gonna use the ABS. That's a uppercase A. I imported that from some pie so I can use it as is. And there we see it's printed to the screen. Absolute value of x minus three minus five. So what did I do? I bought this five from the right-hand side across to the left-hand side. What I did was subtract five from both sides. And now what I'm gonna do, I'm gonna pass that as first argument to the reduce underscore ABS underscore inequality function. Now that's not an inequality. I can certainly still use this function and I'm just gonna say equal equal as my second argument. So I'm making this an equality and then I want to reduce as far as x is concerned. And we can see our two results. x equals negative two. And we can see this symbol there. That's an or symbol or x equals eight. I can plug in either of those two values. I will get the solution. Now look at this. Now I've used the solve function. We're much more familiar with that one because this is not an inequality. So this might be more appropriate to use. So let's have a look at it. There's my equation function. First argument is the left-hand side. That's the absolute value of x minus three comma. My right-hand side is five. And I want to solve for x. And now I see negative two comma eight. Now I just want you to be careful here. Those square brackets there, again that's just part of a Python list and it's telling me there's two possible solutions that does not indicate a closed interval from negative two to eight. So we just got to be careful when we look at these results. Now if you want to verify these, I'm just going to do it the old-fashioned way. I think this is the only way you can do it. Let's put in negative two. That's one of my solutions. So the absolute value of negative two minus three is that equal to five? So I'm asking equal equal five is the left-hand side equal to the right-hand side when I substitute one of my solutions? Yes, that's correct. Let's substitute the other solution which is eight and indeed that's correct as well. Now let's have this as an inequality. The absolute value of x minus three less than five. So now certainly I've got to use the reduce underscore abs underscore inequality. So there's an absolute value in there. Now there's my absolute value the left-hand side and I've bought that five over to the left-hand side so that I only have the left-hand side. Unfortunately you have to do that. My second argument is the inequality. It's a less than symbol as far as a string is concerned. I've got to put that as a string comma. This is all solved for x and I'm adding the simplify method to all of that and now I get this result. x is larger than negative two and that little tent it looks like a that's and if it's upside down then it's an or or an and you've got to get those two correct. So this says x is larger than negative two and it's less than eight. So it's certainly in that open interval from negative two to eight. So let's choose a value there such as zero that's certainly between negative two and eight and that should return a true and then very lastly let's substitute something that's not in that interval something like nine and if I execute that now I'm gonna get a false and so actually it is a lot of fun rather easy I would say to use some pie for your inequality problems with or without absolute values in them as well.