Hello and welcome back to The Craft Box. My name is Brent and today we're on episode 231 of the Wizard101 Death Walkthrough. Last episode if you haven't checked it out already we finished off Polaris We defeated the rat and today we are starting Mirage. Oh There you are. Well, have you remembered what you forgot? Any bells ringing? Something about Grandfather Tree perhaps? Don't you think it's about time someone went and checked on Bartleby? Don't look at me.  Oh In scholar Xander wants a word before you go probably to share his latest theory about the meaning of life Go on now. Time is wasting Okay, he's got a lot of things. Okay Um, let's go over here. We're loading Mirage. Nice. That's always good to do Speak to Xander Hello Hi mate Fantastic work in Polaris. You handle that like a real pro. You're still new to the Arcana, but you're already making waves Since you stop spiders playing with the sky anchor I've been wondering if that might have somehow soothed Bartleby's condition If you can stop in and pay a visit to the old tree, that'd be a real burn to the whole team here Have to keep tabs on these things, you know Seeing as how you're such a recent graduate. We're thinking of you as our official envoy to Ravenwood So there you go. Have a good trip Okay, what spells does he learn we still haven't like seen so he gives natures wrath and forest lord, okay That's cool Interesting, I mean, I just like seeing what all the other Teachers can give even if we will never learn it because we don't need to Yeah, this is cool saying what they can all give Let's go over to Ravenwood and Speak to old bottle be Good old bottle be Boop boop boop boop boop boop boop boop boop boop boop hello And was it city go to work early? Yeah, go to work. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah Hello, dear judging by his foliage Bartleby's condition certainly hasn't improved In fact, he appears to be worse you should speak to him and find out how he's feeling and don't forget to use your bedside manners Okay, sure sure that makes complete sense Let's speak to him. He needs a lot of help apparently Why is the graveyard music going it's a bit weird It's escaping me right now That happens more and more often these days My trunk feels thick and dry My branches grew and my leaves and lost their healthy glow. I feel poor and body mind and spirit What's happening to me? It seems like there's something I should remember but it keeps escaping my memory If I had my other eye the eye of history, I think it would help, but I Can't even remember what happened to it. Can you ask Merrill Ambrose? Okay, let's go to Ambrose it's been so long. Oh my gosh, we haven't met seen him in forever since he graduated us Too long, you know too long You hiccups not the good and let us load in the Lord's in to the commons, please Hello, who's in here today? Probably a whole lot of people a whole boatload of people that is for sure Are my favorite Ravenwood alumnus, I understand you've joined the Arcanum I suspected you might wind up there talent such as yours I wasn't able to say anything of course everything with the Arcanum is always a secret They prefer it that way and it does seem wise The Arcanum's work is crucial.  I just can't fathom why this is happening. Oh, he mentioned the eye of history Yes, he has been rather nostalgic lately Oh, but perhaps the eye could help restore his health, too Of course, we both know that it was Malistair who stole Bartleby's eye But we never learned what he did with it. Did we know we didn't want oversight to be sure I suggest you go to the death school and see Dworkin Ask if he has any idea where Malistair would have hidden it This is them being like oh shit we completely forgot about the eye Let's quickly bring it in somehow and then just make a whole world about the eye make sense, right? Yep, definitely Hmm So yeah, I mean it they I'm happy that they finally are talking about it again because it's been since the start of the game like Wizard City When we last heard any word of the eye of history. No one else has ever said anything about it But seems kind of weird that they've just waited this long, but you know whatever I haven't actually listened to most of the dialogue in Here so I honestly don't know what's gonna happen I know kind of the whole idea of it. I haven't listened to any of the dialogue though. So, you know, we'll see what happens Hello there. Why hello there wizard.   No clues here at the school, but you might try Malistair's house in Dark Cave I don't think anyone's been in there since been a long time One thing to know after Sylvia's death. I think he did some remodeling so who knows What you might find in there, but yeah Good luck. I love Dwargan. He's great. Best character in the game Behind Wu obviously and Xander because they're great, but Dwargan's pretty up there Let us head on over to the Dark Cave. Yay All the way over in Cyclops Lane I'm not running all the way down to Firecat Alley. That's for sure You already know that that's not where I'm running Even though I think it's actually I think the quest story makes you go to Firecat Alley, but I'm not running down the Firecat Alley There's no way I'm doing that. I'd rather go in the dark cave the other way Because it's quicker to get to the dark cave um So yeah, let's go over to Cyclops Lane So this bit here I believe is basically all solo So you have to be by yourself, which is this just kind of cool I kind of like how they Incorporate some of these solo parts at the start of the game Or the start of each world not at the start of the game the start of each world. It's just kind of nice Especially since chrysalis. I don't think they did it for as techa Actually, no they did because we had to go into Haley's observatory since has techa. Yeah, and it's I kind of enjoy it Um, yeah, what's really funny is the quest story once you go to Firecat Alley, but you're like nope I'm going to Cyclops Lane And then it's like oh you can do that as well. I suppose but I highly suggest Firecat Alley But Firecat Alley is just further away to run Whereas dark cave is literally right there. So, you know Gotta get that dark cave going boys Hello now it's kind of far away isn't it? Oh, no, it's even closer this way Because wait what? Why would they want you to go to I'm so confused I am so confused. Why would they want you to go to Firecat Alley then? Maybe I'm just too smart for them I'm just too smart for the quest error because look it's right here. Hi Spooky wee eye up above what is this bubby yogi 2.0 memories of tragedy and triumph Wash over you as you enter the home of your former nemesis Portraits and keepsakes remind you that this was not just Malastair's house, but Sylvia Drake's as well You feel an eerie sense of foreboding when you look at the door at the back of the hall It's probably worth investigating I think this is the only time you can come in here and I just gotta say what is this shrine now astere What is this shrine my dude? Kind of like that um that the old dragon spire and the grand chasm the old grand chasm before it was burnt to death Um, who is that? That's interesting. Um, but yeah, let's go into here And we will see what we got to do now.  We are just killing Um, not too difficult at all. Um, so yeah easy peasy He dead he gone dead with the spectral guardian defeated You can now explore deeper into Malastair's sanctum Do I want to though? That's the question do I want to across the room? You see Malastair's desk here. He sat feverishly searching old tomes for a way to bring Sylvia back On the desk open to the page where Malastair left it lies what appears to be a journal You should read it for clues Okay, let's read the book then As you begin reading the journal you can almost hear a Malastair's voice My efforts to resurrect Sylvia have met no success But I've heard of a mysterious group of scholars called the cabal They may know a way this cabal lives up to its reputation They communicate through a masked agent who goes only by the initials g and d Nervous as it makes me to deal with this cabal they claim to have the answers I seek What choice do I have? I meet them tonight In exchange for information the cabal demands I give them the eye of history They plan to take it to the world of Mirage. I know not why I am conflicted. I fear what the cabal's intentions in Mirage may be But I've come too far to turn back now I made the exchange the secret to resurrecting Sylvia lies within an ancient tome Known as the croco nomicon to crocotopia. I go You close the journal and place it in your backpack headmaster ambrose needs to see this So it's you the headmaster's little pet been a long time But I always knew we'd cross paths again. You've grown in power. I have too My associates now make ambrose look like a hedge wizard. Perhaps you've heard of the cabal They have agents everywhere even wizard city After this I'll be a full-fledged member See they detected an intruder here and sent me that journal's not going anywhere neither are you Am I not? Okay That's a shame, isn't it? Um Dunkin' Grinwater didn't think you would be the one to betray me. Did I? Um, it's fine. We would just deal with that. Um, okay How am I child? Do you? Hey, are you on the Are you good bro? You think you're good, but you're not actually good. Are you good? Bro, you're good Oh Do they cheat a German gloom.  You have 6,000 now. Do you think you're good? Like what? Mobs in Azteca have more health than you Jesus Oh, okay. I mean, I suppose it's because since it's like meant to be so low able they had to like tone it down just to touch um for Schools that are not as good at soloing a bowling like I mean, I I don't know I'm conflicted. I don't know that you see because Did they do that purposefully?  Maybe myth myth probably myth is probably a definite I'm gonna try and use winged because I haven't used that yet and I want to It's been just sitting in my deck and every time I'm like nope not using it not using it. Lulu's better. Lulu's better But today since it's just a single target my dude, we're gonna Singly target him with a wing because we can Lulu Nope, okay. I thought it would Lulu for a second there Got shadow magic. He's got he's apparently defeated Malastir as well. So that's a bit strange. Don't know what's up with that um I need just a shadow, but basically and possibly a faint and then we're good. We're good What's this berserk?  He's still not the best. Can we Think I should do another blade just in case Because I did discard my prism. So I want to just make sure I kill I mean he has like no health, but you never know. I'll hit next Because I want to winged also. I think has less accuracy. So we're gonna have to see if I physical I think I have like a couple percent chance like two or one or two. I think it's 1% chance because I've got 19 accuracy So we'll see. He actually has a lot of damage. I'm surprised I am surprised that He has a lot of damage or pierce probably pierce because he's wearing malastir stuff. So Probably pierce. Um I mean, we can always just finish off with a headless, which we haven't used in forever. So Is it now? Hello Oh, hi Haven't seen you before. Hello How much is this is gonna do mass? I swear this is gonna do a lot Yep, okay. He's dead. Bye Easy peasy Yay, we even used this spell Okay, then um, let's take out a couple of those then I'll just take out those as well. We will redo our deck. We will Put in a dear knight and thingy like that Yep, that should be good. Okay. Uh, we just need to take out this and Ambrose Easy peasy. That wasn't too difficult. I was expecting something slightly more intense, but apparently no It's apparently no Okay, and Ambrose. Hello Oh Malastir's journal I shudder to think what insanity is expressed within these pages Nonetheless, I will have to read it Any clues regarding the eye of history the cabal I'm not familiar, but they sound dangerous A shame Duncan has taken up with them So the cabal took the eye to mirage. That is very troubling Probably no coincidence that mirage is one of the world's spider mentioned You should consult with your friends at the arcannon. Perhaps they've heard of this Cabal and of course you should visit mirage, too Before you go, however, see your friend Malori near the life school She's very talented, but she seems unhappy. Perhaps you can cheer her up That sounds like a great idea. Um, we're already nearly halfway through to level 116 That's kind of ridiculous And we're already just starting mirage.  I've done too many side quests I mean, I've only done the side quests up to celestia. I've still got zafari and above to do so We'll see Um, let's hit over to Ravenwood though and go and meet up with Malori Malori Malou Lalala lorry. Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello Load please please lord. Thank you Well, if it isn't the most heroic celebrity wizard who ever lived seriously, you're all anyone talks. Ah, come on You know I'm kidding, right? It's actually great to see you. I'm learning a lot at Ravenwood, but it's not like Polaris When this dialogue first came out, and the end of Mirage hadn't came out yet in Test Drum, everyone was like, I'll be dot dot dot here, that means something, and I mean spoilers it does. But um, yeah, we'll see that a bit later, um, if it's you, we'll just go through the bottom. So yeah, that was all the rage, I remember theories and theories about it, and most of them turned out to be correct, um, so yeah, that's fun. Uh, I can um, hello, go to world, yes please. Okay, I'm back, sorry the game crashed, nothing I could do about that one, hello. Ugh, it's about time you returned, initiate, you are supposed to check on the tree, not climb up in its branches and take a nap. I only have been waiting to hear your report, I'd get in there right away if I were you. She's not exactly known for her patience. I really dislike FitzHum, he's just annoying.  I dislike him, FitzHum is annoying, he cannot be good at all, hello, hello, hello Ione. Did I hear FitzHum say I was impatient? I feel surprised. Do you think I lack patience? mind we don't have time for that what news from grandfather tree he's worse I see the eye of history taken to mirage by the cabal are you certain hmm they try to use a nice way of rhyming there that's kind of funny I feel perplexed yes I think I have heard of this cabal a group of dark wizards mysterious you should go to Mirage talk to Kizma I feel like she's not telling me a lot of things about Mirage on the cabal what does she have for Triton and Storm Lord oh okay that's cute she thinks she's good Triton in a storm load oh let's head over to Kizma Kizma girl teacher instructor I should say it's probably not really a teacher who we quoting the the spell quest we're gonna advance Nick the arts of necromancy together so that's that's fun well let's talk to her hiya greetings and a shit you seek to travel to Mirage might I ask why the eye of history is there hmm if true this might explain a great deal you must understand Mirage is a world of constant change ever shifting sands but the last few years have seen a rash of massive sandstorms more recently there was a sandstorm of colossal proportions during the storm somehow the world door in Mirage was lost in the sands you see the sands of Mirage are unique there are more than elements in a desert landscape they are quite literally the sands of time thus the world door is lost not just in space but in time as well I believe however I've devised a way to reach it and to restore it I have not yet pin pointed its exact location in the space time continuum but this portal can at least get you in the vicinity take the portal find the lost world door where it is buried and use this charm to restore it to its proper time and place then return okay all that nice head over there then good job because we'll poof over there poof and we will see what is happening over here of course this is a pass through the portal and find yourself in a place unlike any you've seen before sand stretches to the horizon in all directions kizma said the world door would be close but possibly buried in the sand you'll have to search for it um of course this is again solo like you can literally go wherever you want here it's ridiculous it's so cool this is honestly really cool we can go all the way up here look oh we can't go that far there's like a big board here yeah big border right here this is the ditch of the border it's called the border ditch that's what I'm gonna call it um this is so cool I'm gonna say so cool okay let's figure out what we're going oh look there is a hole a wanderer appears in the desert from another time and another world but with purpose you seek to restore the world door it is close but you must discover the secret of the sand to reach it the sand hide many secrets but sometimes they can reveal them as well collect sand grains from the sand swallows and return okie dokie then let's go and collect some sand swallows and and I'll be back once I've done that because they are just small shoot I should switch decks they are just mobs so I'll be back in just a bit okay I am that we're creating a lot of the moment jeez doesn't matter you block but he's dead anyway they have like no health I'm back we are just about to kill or at least most of them that once that block will take a bit of a dot to them but you know it's fine it's fine um seems just one maybe nope too okay okay 50% block chance that makes sense um they nearly did though they have like nothing he blocked the overtime as well oh my gosh that's rude that's so rude is rude is he dead please die yes cool fantastic um so that's that done easy peasy of like 2000 health it's ridiculously easy um what'll we get antique coins nice cool that is good for crafting um and let's get some health just because I know we will probably need it in a sec and back here hello well done wanderer now cast the sand grains into the chasm and see what is revealed you cast the sand grains into the chasm and a bridge is revealed that will take you across you sense that the world door is buried somewhere amid the dunes on the other side but you aren't sure exactly where where I'm okay let's continue on this is the map is really cool it's just nothing really I'm still in the arc anim which is kind of unfortunate but literally just nothing as you reach the top of the dune you finally see the world door partially submerged in the sand only problem is it's guarded by a genie oh no our first genie that we have to face oh my god I don't know if he has minions but we're just gonna deal with them if he does it's fine I think he summons he's a minor cheat so I don't really know what he does I don't really care he he's both balance and myth apparently so that's something we boost on both so I mean that's fine oh let's go for a faint hello there okay he does summon minions that's what I thought he would do that's why did I not change everything into just just um because the minions wouldn't die and I need to kill the minions surprisingly okay Renegade puppet rank 14 balance what is he he's got no half okay then that's cute blade number one he's got 7000 that's not too bad minus 70 hello okay that's a bit cheeky that is a bit cheeky that is very very cheeky I don't know how to feel about that to be honest was not expecting that one that's fine we'll just deal with it I suppose okay helping hands cute or availing I don't know which one I don't judge well but we got two sheds already jays and that's good if I had a trike that would have been so handy but I don't which is unblocked on that um what's this okay that's fun nice to be a lady there what's this okay good I thought it was a shield for a second that would have been bad oh can we get another blade please blade cheers go for this one and then another one Nikolaha me what does that even mean oh hello hello there what does he pull the morphin to into a big boy one big boy does he increase alpha that's question Athena hello got shield now damn it oh well it's fun cheeky cheeky using Athena whoa that's honest that is actually a surprise for me didn't expect him to use Athena okay I thought Athena came out after a marriage but apparently not what does he got now he's got same amount of health I think um do this we'll do this one and then we'll hit with a Lulu and then if he's not dead we'll hit with a um another Lulu or dinner whichever one probably less it's really have a shade as well which is good it is good um yeah let's go let's go if we crit that'll be nice if not that is unfortunately not nice no crit that's unfortunate but we got some blades which is nice three blades two feints 28 that's fine and how much of that 63 we boost off them okay the boss is dead yeah the boss is surely dead because he didn't go at like 7000 and the minions still alive or just dead knight probably probably the easiest way he doesn't much which is good sandstorm okay good job um day night or Lulu which one looks cooler Lulu's probably quicker and does more as well and I can't be more than waiting for another time to kill if it doesn't so we'll do Lulu is OP Lulu is OP Lulu is OP Lulu is OP Lulu is good good good good good good there we go fantastic yeah easy peasy that was not hard at all Junes what a genie defeated you can now approach and use kismas charm to restore the world door okay then if the charm worked correctly the world door should now be restored to its proper time in place you can use the portal to return to kismas okay that was easy I assume it's this portal here yep apparently so poof away poof away as we came in as we poofed on in we poof on out easy peasy that's not too difficult um kismas hello you were gone some time I trust you found the door and the charm worked as expected excellent now you can travel to mirage the proper way here is the key to the world door start by investigating this recent colossal sandstorm as you know grandfather spider is likely involved search for clues but be patient and disciplined the answers will come in time I suspect they will lead you to the eye of history as well take heed however things in mirage are often not as they seem and allegiances shift like the sands stay strong and report back soon we were kind of like hidden there for a bit geez could still move but hidden or at least spin and hidden it's kind of weird let's head on over and see what we were dealing with and then we'll end off the episode most of these episodes of mirage will be slightly longer than the ones in Polaris just because I want to keep moving a bit faster than what we would originally have been going so yeah they're gonna be slightly faster longer but it'll be a faster pace sort of walk through mirage look at that fantastic the new world I love the new world it's so good every new world I just love it love it so much whoo let's go who do we have over here today goodness gracious if it isn't another intrepid adventurer how marvelous come closer dear and let birdie have a look at you look at us this looks so cool okay let's not walk off it then that's not a good idea oh my you look simply fabulous the fashions you wizards wear these days are breathtaking you bring flair to a humble little world oh yes such a treat first the world door reappears and now all these sophisticated visitors often nomad merchants would be thrilled they would be if they were here oh but the tragedy I can't keep up this facade who are you fooling birdie our shame is plain to see just look it's an embarrassment caravan is supposed to be a colorful thriving hub of activity but instead it's an eyesore a dead zone I measured I drew designs I planned colors I even staked out tent locations but it remains horrifically vacant please you must help us see the solitary tent down there it belongs to San Diego the so called tired nomad he claims to be wise ask him if anything can be done let's go to San Diego just because that'd be kind of cool I think we go down this way do we yes we do okay let's not look please thank you okay um San Diego I really love how this health was down here that's really cool that's really really cool San Diego hello greetings wanderer I am San Diego the wise oh birdie told you wait what did he say the tired nomad I am not tired I am retired I swear I do not think the cat understands a word I've said he still seems to think this whole thing is some kind of fashion show no you see I retired to keep watch over this crossroads while the other nomads roam the desert this place caravan it is sacred for centuries when there is danger in the desert this is where the nomads gather for safety when the winds of change blow they know to come after this recent sandstorm the winds of change began blowing but the nomads have not come I fear they have been held up on the road I believe the winds brought you here to aid us to find the nomads and shepherd them to safety go west wanderer find nomads and aid them okay so next time we will be hitting on through around Mirage and going to basically help the nomads come there's these two I was like where is Zeke and Eloise my favorite two people to see at any new world well look here I should have known you be here now wizard some will turn up the sun you know what I mean Mirage is hot that birdie fellow tells me they're a little oasis he scattered around Mirage but of course he can't tell me where while you're exploring could you make note of every oasis you run across and come let me know thank you you're gonna be the one who saves me wizard eight of them okay and Eloise hello oh I was hoping I'd run into you here wizard once again I've gotten myself into a bit of a thorny situation I could use a hand my floral exhibits at the Royal Museum have become hugely popular naturally the museum wants more flowers so they sent me here to Mirage the museum wants me to collect Mirage cactus blossoms which while beautiful are surrounded by cactus spines sharp cactus spines you've already helped me so many times but if you're so inclined could you save my delicate fingers and pick me a few cactus blossoms sure thing um so yeah there's a couple of them to do we can actually just quest out for that one that's good okay so yeah thank you for watching next time we will continue on in Mirage room into the like and subscribe and if you've already subscribed press the little bell so you know exactly when I post another video and remember craft outside the box


Now we're live. Hi everyone and welcome to another Yaron Debates Europe. So today the discussion will be on the topic of libertarianism. So many of us in the Objectivist universe we started first time our first contact with the ideas of freedom was through the libertarian movement. At the same time there are some differences. So these are the topics that we will discuss today. So with us we have Tam Laird. Tam is a leading figure in the Scottish Libertarian Party. Now Scotland, if you know anything about the country, is not the most fertile ground for libertarian ideas. So well done Tam for standing up for these ideas in a hostile environment, I would say. And you all know Yaron. Yaron is the chairman of the board of the Andron Institute and the host of the Yaron Bruxo. And unless you're living under a rock, you've probably seen Yaron on GB News on Friday. Last time I checked the Twitter video had something like 50,000 views. If you haven't checked it, go to his YouTube channel and check the whole segment. It was a sensation. So without further delay we're going to start with Tam. He's going to have 10 minutes to do his introductory remarks. Then we go to Yaron and then there's going to be some inter-panel discussion and then we're going to go to questions from the audience via Super Chat. A big thank you to the Andron Institute for supporting this debate series with Yaron. And without further delay, Tam, the floor is yours. Thank you. Libertarianism. Okay, I'm going to explain exactly what I mean because it's good to define what you're talking about before we've been getting to these things. And although most of the people out there will be libertarians, some of them may not be and some of them who think they are may not be and some of them who think they aren't may well be. So Libertarianism. PGO Rourke once said that it was like we were conservatives alike to get high or we were capitalist hippies. But they're funny terms, but I don't think either is accurate. So what is libertarianism? I suppose there's the movement and then there's the parties. And I'm leader of the Scottish Libertarian Party. So we're a political party where we hold a menarchist position and we engage in the political system. Some of us are uncaps and arco-capitalists.  So you have to be, if you're engaging, that's the rules of the game when you engage in the political system. So there we go. So but the movement wider, people would regard people like Yaron has been part of the Libertarian movement in a wider sense. I'm sure he'll give us his reasons why he isn't. Even the Tea Party movement would be regarded as within the Libertarian framework. More conservatorians, even like the aforementioned PGO Rourke would be regarded as libertarian in some senses. But let's just talk about primarily the political philosophy. It's primarily a political philosophy born out of the Enlightenment era. It's a philosophy, if we have government at all, how it should be and what are its limits?  And in the UK, the term is still associated with Americanism and it's seen as some sort of foreign idea. Nothing could be further from the truth. It was born here, in my view, here in the UK. Adam Smith, it's certainly through the economic sense of the word and other Enlightenment figures. So as I say, we stole it from left wing anarchists. It has its roots and individualism and classic liberal ideas about the rights of man. It doesn't have a single foundation of originator such as John Locke and the idea of natural rights. That's part of it. But it's something that grew organically and what we have today. It's for the greater part predicated on the rights of the individual and the concept, at least, of individual rights and liberties. Look after the rights of the individual and you can't fail to look after the rights of everyone. Self-ownership, property rights, without which you really have no other rights when you get down to it. First thing everyone owns, even an untouchable living in the gutter in India, as far as libertarians concerned. First thing that that person owns is themself. They have self-ownership and that means that they cannot be touched, harmed or should not be touched, harmed, abused, used, unless they give express permission. It's about individual sovereignty. So no one is allowed to use me, enslave me, force me to do anything against my will, touch me without and for express permission or consent. And this is at the heart of libertarianism. And that is what results in our view about government. Government being, in a sense, a nature force, it should be kept to a very bare minimum with minimum powers. What libertarianism is not, it's not a religious philosophy or a panacea for life's ills. It doesn't tell you how you should live your life. I openly admit I don't know exactly what's best for myself a lot of the time. So how in the hell am I going to know what's best for someone else's life? Someone different to me in race, religion, background, tastes, I don't know. We have the humility as libertarians to admit that your life is yours. Live it as you see fit as long as you don't impede or infringe on the rights of others to do the same. Certainly government doesn't know what's best for your life. It's not, it's often confused with the free market conservatism. There is some overlap but conservatives are generally paternalistic and most conservatives that I met feel that the role of government is to make people good, i.e. to encourage people or to force people to do what the right thing. You take drugs, that's a bad thing, you know, so we walk you up for that. So that would be one of the differences there. So incorporated into that is the non-aggression principle. Don't use force or violence to further your ideas or further what it is that you want to do, okay? You don't use violence against peaceful people to achieve your goals. Not to be confused with pacifism, which means you never get engaged in violence or violent conflict. You are allowed to use violence in order to defend yourself because this is part of libertarian philosophy as well. You own yourself, you're allowed to defend your property. So you're allowed to defend yourself with violence. It can also include third party defense but you do not initiate the use of force with peaceful people. You have the right to life.  You have a right to property, which again I said is the first thing you own is yourself and anything else that you acquire without theft, fraud or the use of force. Libertarians oppose taxation accordingly, especially when it's involuntary taxation. If I agree or I contract to pay a contribution, that's a different matter and that would be a violation of property rights if it's involuntary. Right to contract in terms of who you enter into an agreement with what you put in your body, what job you do, what medical treatment you seek. It's entirely up to you because you have a right to do that as an individual. The right to free speech in a public domain. I have a right to say what I like in a public domain. At this moment in time, I'm part of this podcast. You guys are in charge of it. If at any time I say anything that you think is over the mark, you can say Tom, you can either stop saying that or you can leave the podcast. That's entirely up to you. You have the freedom to do that in this thing that you've set up. But in a free and in a public domain, government should certainly, should not be put in restrictions on what people say. Right to liberty unless you violate someone else's right to work and the right to learn. So as libertarianism good or bad, well what's good, what's bad? Who would say the free speech is bad? Well, some people's feelings get hurt when you say things that offend them. Sometimes you could say something that somebody else may take as an encouragement to go out and do an act of violence. Is that responsibility? I think not. Fossil fuels, are those a good thing? I think by and large, yes, although they have caused some harm, anybody who found a starving man would think it would be a good thing to give him a square meal. However, if you don't know anything about medical treatment, you'll probably go and kill him if you give him a full meal and be starving. So therefore a good thing would be bad in that situation. So what is good? Is it good intentions or is it good results? I think with good results overall, libertarianism, the freer that a society is, the less government interference, the more prosperous the society becomes. So sorry, I've lost the thread here. Free markets, free speech, free expression, and free people maximize human well-being and flourishing, all of which are preferable to government overreach and the infringement of individual rights and liberties. And I think libertarianism promotes that, fights for that, stands for that, and that ultimately is a good thing for the individual and it's also a good thing for people in general. So Yaron, is there anything wrong with the things that we've heard? Sure. So first, thanks Thomas for joining us, really appreciated. And let me say on issue by issue, Thomas and I will probably agree on many of the political stands. I don't know if all of them, but certainly on most of them, we would be in agreement. But the problem is that the idea of libertarianism and the concept of libertarianism is ill-defined. I mean, even Thomas had a hard time or Tom had a hard time defining it at the end. We heard no definition and even the people under this big umbrella, Adam Smith is a libertarian, but he supported a central bank. The libertarian support a central bank. Supporting a central bank excludes you from being a libertarian.  And in any respect, a lot of things that I think Tom on an issue by issue would completely disagree with. I've seen communist libertarians, I've seen socialist libertarians, I've seen obviously anarchist libertarians, I've seen left anarchist libertarians, I've seen right anarchist libertarians, so-called anarcho-capitalist, maybe that's for another day why that is a contradiction in terms. And then of course, there's the bleeding heart libertarians who are, by the way, philosophers for the most part. So if you go to the bleeding heart libertarian website, these are real deep thinkers who have, and yet many of them stand by UBI, universal basic income. They stand by some kind of welfare state even in this libertarian political ideal that they have. Tom is not a pacifist. I'm very happy to hear that, but there are many libertarians who are pacifists, literally pacifists, particularly when it comes to Fon Posse pacifists, attack him. I mean, I've read their articles out on the Mises website and other places.  I certainly am not. So what is it? What is the core? And here I think, and I think this is a fundamental problem, even though everybody agrees on supposedly the non-aggression principle, but do they, the Tea Party certainly didn't agree with it. You can't have Medicare and Social Security without aggression. Adam Smith didn't agree with it. The Scottish Enlightenment generally didn't agree with it. There was a lot of aggression, a minimal aggression, better than anybody else. I'll take the Scottish Enlightenment any day over pretty much anybody, but there was still aggression. The communist libertarians might claim to be, to uphold the non-aggression principle, but I would worry about them ever reaching power if they would stick to that. I doubt it. So the main problem with the, or one big problem with libertarianism is that it's not clear what it refers to. It's not clear whether it has a consistent set of ideas and a consistent set of principles, which I think is problematic. Now, if you start your own kind of political party like Scottish libertarians, maybe you can then delimit, okay, these are the things we stand for. But as a movement, particularly globally, it's very ambiguous and difficult and contradictory in terms of what they stand for. You know, I know you mentioned all the different things that people called libertarians. I think PJ O'Rourke stole his definition from Iron Man because Iron Man talked about libertarians being hippies of the right. That was so deficient in the 1970s and the idea was not, I think, just that she, you know, she agreed, for example, on something like drug legalization. It's the relish with which libertarians often take drug legalization because they so want to be using them that I think she objected to. But this is really the fundamental issue I have with libertarianism and that is that it is an ambiguous political philosophy at best, but it has no real foundation. It has no philosophical foundation. It has no moral foundation. It has no epistemological foundation. And this is, you know, it's based on, for most people, based on this, you know, basically on a kind of subjectivist approach. We want everybody to be able to do whatever the hell they want and who's anybody to intervene and let them just do it and we're not going to judge. Tom said that a little bit, right? If you have your religion, you have your this, you have your that. We're not going to judge you. You can do whatever you want. It's live and let live, but it accepts implicitly a very subjectivist approach to morality. I think such an approach, anything related to subjectivism is very dangerous and ultimately can easily lead to the violation of a non-aggression principle. I have a problem with what the non-aggression principle even is. Is it a principle? What's it based on? Why not be aggressive, right? Almost every philosophy in the world accepts aggression if the goal is a good goal, right? If the purpose is a good purpose. So why not? What is the justification for the non-aggression principle? I don't think libertarians have one. I think this is a real flaw in the libertarian movement. Self-ownership is a problem. Who owns you? I mean, it's a circular argument, right? Ownership is a concept of self. Self owns, right? But what are you owning if you are the owner? It's philosophically a very unsatisfying concept. You have sovereignty of yourself. That's a different concept. Self-ownership is a tricky, a tricky, a tricky concept and very difficult to justify out there in the world as the non-aggression principle is. If good can be achieved and you don't want to define good, none of us, right? The whole point of libertarianism, a part of the point of we don't want to define good for you. So if I can show you that good could be achieved, my good could be achieved, our good could be achieved by using force. Then what's the argument against that if we're not in the business defining good? So you can't really have a political theory. You can't really have a political ideology or political philosophy without some definition of good, not a political philosophy that's universal. Again, you can hold a certain view, but it's not universalizable, is that a word? You can't make it universal unless you have a view of what the good is. Individual rights are a concept that is based on a philosophical identification, based on an identification about your life, about what is good. So for example, there is no such thing as individual rights unless you understand that what is good is that individuals should have their capacity and have their ability and it's right for them, right in a moral sense, to make decisions for themselves. But that's a moral statement. That is a statement of what the good is. And that reason is the means by which they should do it. And the enemy of reason is force. Therefore we should ban force from human interaction because it's not good for individuals in the pursuit of their happiness. But that has a lot of goods in it, has a lot of morality in it, and indeed individual rights at the end of the day is a moral, not a political concept. It's a concept that bridges morality to politics. As a consequence, I think it's this subjectivism, it's this lack of willingness to identify the good and to delve into morality and to identify objective standards for human well-being. That is, there are certain things that are objectively good for human beings that we can dictate, if you will, not dictate in terms of force, but dictate in terms of ideology, in terms of ideas. It is the unwillingness to say these set of ideas are the right ideas at the foundation that make a concept like anarchy and suppose an alcohol capitalism possible, because an alcohol capitalism is the exactly rejection of any kind of objective standard. It is the view that anything goes, literally anything goes, because now there's no government even to protect individual rights. So even individual rights are gone once you accept anarchy. If my police force, the one I hire, doesn't believe in individual rights and can get enough subscriptions, it might dominate an individual rights out. They're irrelevant. So anarchy excludes individual rights, rejects individual rights, and it rejects any kind of objective view of morality and objective view of human life, an objective view of what are the standards by which human beings need to flourish. So I would love to see a libertarian movement, libertarian party, that delimited what it stood for, that made clear what it was about, that rejected things like anarchy and things like the Tea Party and even Adam Smith, if necessary. And it accepted the idea that any movement towards liberty, any movement, any real success in terms of changing the world towards freedom and liberty is going to require the identification of clear moral ethical standards. It's going to require a clear identification of a philosophy of liberty, not just politics. Politics is a derivative. Politics is the last thing that matters in the end. What matters ultimately is why liberty, why freedom. We have to be able to answer that question. And to answer that question is a moral answer. And we need an ethic. And this is Ayn Rand. This is what objectiveism provides. And I think the rejection or the evasion of Ayn Rand by libertarian intellectuals and leaders over the decades has done a lot of harm to the movement, to whatever movement there is, has done a lot of harm to the ability to promote these ideas. What libertarians need is some objective morality and an objective view of the world. And that's what Rand provides. So I encourage libertarians to embrace Rand. Thanks. Thank you, Yaron. So let's do this now. So, Tom, you heard Yaron's objections. You have three, four minutes to address them and then Yaron can reply to you in a direct manner. I think in Libertaria or Libertopia, there's no conflict because Yaron can live his objectivist life and create his objectivist community. And after everybody sees just how prosperous, just how crime free, just how moral and ethical his community is, people will emulate it. You know, they want to emulate it. I don't see how you could make objectivism universal without some use of governmental force. And in terms of government taking care of individual rights and liberties, out of all the governments there are in the world, I mean, I could pick maybe a handful and say that they take care of individual rights and liberties to any degree that I would say good. Even in the U.S. at the moment, even with what you would think would be the cast iron constitution that the U.S. created, the government simply ignores the constitution. So in other words, the government exists in an anarchist relationship with its people because who forces your government? All it's the people. Well, the government's got all the guns, all the planes, all the tanks and the so-called legitimate use of force and violence, which you don't have. So as far as the government being some sort of guarantor of your individual rights and liberties, I don't think it works too well. But and furthermore, to say that, okay, libertarianism as a movement or as a concept or as a philosophy may not have any ethics as yarn or may lack ethics as yarn as insisted. But that could be said of many different types of political philosophies. Good God, socialism.  Conservatism, conservatism is the same. It has the same sort of divisions. There isn't a political philosophy out there that has some sort of unified idea. And the ones that did, the ones that got closest such as communism and fascism, well, we know where that ended up. And it all comes down to, I mean, through being a libertarian, I may not have sort of hard and fast ethics about according to Yaron. But I have my own as let's say as a Christian, I have I have ethics that derive from Christian beliefs and Christian morality. And I might think that abortion is a clear violation of an individual's right to life. Somebody else who's a libertarian may decide, well, no, that's actually not a life yet. And it's all about individual right to choice. Those two ethics are in conflict. But I think in a libertarian society, that person who wants to have abortion and kill children, there I said it, they can gravitate to a unit or a part of society that allows that and is fine with it. And I can gravitate to another one where we don't have that and we reject that and we reject people within our midst, you know, just like the Amish have their way of life, just like there are Muslim communities that have their way of life, have your way of life in as much as you do not infringe aggressively on somebody else's. And I think as a philosophy, it's, you know, libertarianism is not a destination. Sorry, yeah, it's a journey. It's a pathway to what I believe would be a better world and a better relationship between people and their government. The closer it is to libertarianism, the better it seems to be in my view. And that's the only defense I can offer. It's not that your own doesn't make some salient points about maybe a lack of robust and concrete views on ethics. Well, maybe that's true. But I think in the, certainly within the party, we have enough room for varying views as long as we all agree, our party has a constitution. So anybody who joins, the first question you're asked before you join the parties, I have read the party's constitution and I agree with those things therein. And if I take part in any party political activities that can be viewed at least as a contradiction, a direct contradiction of those values and those and that constitution then, you know, you'll be asked to leave the party. And we have, we have expelled one member in our entire existence so far. And that's not bad. And on Twitter, I'm pretty tall. I haven't blocked anybody yet. Been blocked a couple of times, but I haven't blocked anybody yet. So I think all opinions, all ways of life, as long as you don't harm other individuals, are permissible. But permissible does not mean I share the view that it's okay, you know, knock yourself out. It's a good thing to do drugs. I don't personally hate drugs. Up until about 10 years ago, I would have happily been part of a, you know, what do you call those guys in South America that go around assassinating drug dealers and, yeah, none of the cartels, the, the, yeah, they're like, yeah, they're like vigilantes who go around killing drug dealers and use, I would have happily done that 10 years ago because I saw this, that is an evil that has to be stamped out. But at the end of the day, who am I to tell somebody else what to do with their body, what to put into their body, what to take, what they do after they take the drugs, what they do, what behavior they conduct after they take the drugs, that's a different matter.  No, you chose to take the drugs, you are ultimately responsible. So there is an ethical element to libertarianism. Whether Yaron thinks that that derives from any concrete position, that can be debated. But the ethical positions are there at least, but they're not there to be enforced on other people. I'm not prepared to commit violence against my neighbour because of the way he treats his dog, for example. I don't have to talk to him, I don't have to deal with him, I don't have to do business with him, but I'm not going to, I'm not going to commit violence against him because I don't like the way he treats his pets. But I don't have to agree and I don't have to support him. That's all I would say. Let me remind two people that they can ask their questions via super chat, either to Tam or to Yaron. So Yaron. Yeah, so look, we agree on the fact that you're not going to force people to be moral, but Tom being is up a good issue, the issue of abortion.  Well, so what if they kill children after they're born? Do you not care because it's their neighbour, I'm not dealing with it, right? It's over there, it's not me. They've got their police force enforcing their ability. What if they sexually molest children? What if they do a lot of things that we could think is uprooted? But children particularly who can't defend themselves, they don't have full rights in the sense of being able to engage in activity. The responsibility, the parent, the parent doesn't care, right? The parent either kills them, abuses them, whatever. Who's going to protect them? Or do we say we don't care? I mean, this is the subjectivism. My view is, you know, my view is abortion is not killing, but if my view was yours, if my view was abortion is killing children, then I would want to live in a society, I would insist on living in a society where abortion was not allowed. Don't confuse society with state borders and government. But of course it is. You know, society is the environment, the social environment in which you live. If you're in a society right now, I mean a society right now where I disagree with a lot of it and fighting it, right? But it's not that you can assume that because I live my way and they live their way, we're in a different two societies. Borders matter in that sense because I can separate myself from people over there by a border. They do their thing, I do my thing, I don't intervene. And that's fine. I have no problem with competition between governments, right? Competition between societies. What objective is the idea that you can live in the same society and have all these different laws applying to you or not applying to you. It is, it creates real problems where rights are really going to be violated because one police force has a different conception of rights, for example, abortion, than another police force. And I think you have, you know, this can be expanded into many things. Now there are other problems, of course, with anarchy that have to do with the unsustainability of that equilibrium. Hostile takeovers from business take on a completely different connotation when you're talking about police forces and what hostile means. I believe anarchy is a perpetual civil war and a perpetual madness ultimately leading to authoritarianism. But beyond that, Tom mentioned that socialists don't have ethical theories. They all disagree. Not true. They all disagree. Yes, I mean, that's part of life. But they all share an ethical theory and that's why they're so successful. If you look at socialists and why they've been so successful throughout the last hundred and since Marx, certainly it's because they share an ethical theory. And they share an ethical theory that a lot of people buy into and therefore drawn to socialism of one degree or another. They might disagree about the details. But the fundamental idea that your moral responsibility is to serve your neighbor, your moral responsibility is to help others, your moral responsibility is to each from each according to his ability to each according to his needs. That fundamental concept is prevalent in the entire society.  Conservatism is the same way. Conservatism does share a basic view of morality and is in its very common. It's very successful. One of the reasons conservatives have a hard time fighting socialists, really real conservatives, not the kind of ridiculous people who call themselves conservatives today is because they share much of that morality. If we share that morality with socialists, it's very difficult to convince anybody. And it's definitely very difficult to build a society around an idea of freedom. We need a vision. We need a ideal of morality. Not one that we will impose by force, but one that we will argue for everything we do is argue for, right? We believe in argumentation, not in force. But if we can't project a moral ideal to replace the moral ideal of socialism, we can't beat the socialists of all their different varieties. Yeah, we're going to disagree maybe on implementing the moral strategy in here or there. But we still have to have a moral philosophy without it and a real idea of what the good is.  People want to do what's good.  Almost nobody. Why? Because the outcome is good, they say, right? Almost nobody object to lockdowns. I mean, you poll after poll after poll shows. I don't buy the polls. Who's doing these polls? Never mind the polls. How many people went out to demonstrate? How many people challenged the lockdowns to action? Almost nobody. So, you know, I talk to people, not just people like us, who have an appreciation of liberty. Oh, no, they think lockdowns are good. Why? Because there's a goal. The goal is a good goal. That is to eradicate this virus. And therefore they're okay with force, coercion, being implemented. And you can see this, how many people are okay with government mandates against a million different things. Why? Because they see a good goal, a moral goal as an end. And if we can't challenge the moral goal, if we can't challenge the morality of it, then it's a dead end for us. We have no ideals.  Well, I agree with that sentiment at least.  We know that the founding fathers did in America, particularly did a pretty good job of setting up a constitution that was as good as they could. But that was the 18th century. We could do a much better job today if we were, if we were going to do that, a much better job. The knowledge that we've accumulated the last 200 something years is astounding relative to what Adam Smith, even Adam Smith and certainly the founding fathers had at the time.  The differences are vast.  I mean, everybody can. Somalia has no government. It has anarchy and anarchy in Somalia is going to look like anarchy anybody else. And it's not. And by the way, they are libertarians out of George Mason who think Somalia is a pretty cool deal because I don't know, they have cell phones or something. So no, if you place anywhere in the world, if you create anarchy, I would rather live in any government today as much as they violate rights than in those anarchistic societies or take Iceland of the Middle Ages that David Friedman loves so much where violence was rampant and people killed each other for almost nothing over almost nothing. So or Ireland, which is another one, supposedly, I don't know what you feel about the Irish. So maybe I shouldn't raise this issue, you know, the Scots and Irish, but Ireland is often brought up as an anarchist heaven once upon a time. I would rather live in England today than in Ireland of the Middle Ages and the anarchy that they had and the violence that they engaged in. So I would rather live in most modern countries today than any countries in the Middle Ages, you know? Yeah, but there's a reason we achieve modernity. And I would say that without the state, you don't achieve modernity. So no, it's not an accident that anarchy didn't achieve modernity in Iceland and Ireland and other places. And modernity didn't come in the Middle Ages when you had city states. Modernity came during a period of the state where countries actually exist, because I think you need a monopoly over the use of a territory force, which is what a good government does. All right, I went over my time. Sorry, Nikos, you're muted. Let's go to super chats and Tom, you'll have the chance to reply to these things because some of them are reflected in the super chat question. So super chat from Phil, question to both of you. Is a written constitution and an elected head of state important or just any relevance? How would it affect individual freedom? So Tom, let's start with you. The issue of constitution, you mentioned it earlier so you can elaborate. Well, I think if there's going to be government, then it should be constrained by a constitution. The idea that the government can do what it likes when it likes is an anathema. So it should be constrained by the constitution. I think the problem is, I mean, Jaron talked about we have much more knowledge. The idea that having more knowledge makes you somehow more moral. Something like 40% of death camp guards had PhDs. The idea that the more knowledge you have that somehow makes you more moral, I think, is an absurdity. And I think the founding fathers of the United States were in a kind of unique position. Most of these people had came from Europe and came from a position where they saw the excesses of the state and they created a constitution that tried to curb that. They knew what the state out of control looked like and they knew what tyranny looked like and they knew the kind of things to put in the constitution to prevent it. Fast forward now to Scotland. Scotland has ambitions to tear itself away from the United Kingdom and enslave itself to the European Union. So it's going to have two constitutions. It's going to have the European constitution, which is, I'm not even going to go there. That's a whole different discussion, but it's certainly not anything that I would hold up as libertarian. The Scottish government now is looking at making its own constitution and they're talking about putting things in there like you have a right to medical care. You have a right to food. So if I have a right to food, why the hell should I buy any?  So this is the kind of things that people are putting into constitutions these days because it's all about buying votes. It's a bribeocracy and the nicer, the more you can make your constitution look as if it's going to take care of you from cradle to grave and you won't have to put any effort in, then the more successful that seems to be in a bribeocracy. So I think, yeah, a constitution is important, but it's also important what that constitution says and therein lies that the problem, the devil's in the detail. We'll get back to the issue of Scottish independence time before the end because it's an interesting issue. I saw you were involved in the past and I assume you're in favor of the idea at least of Scottish independence. So let's put a pin on it. We're going to get back to it. So Yaron, constitution and an elected head of state. Well, first let me just say that if Tom assumes that PhDs means they've increased knowledge, he's completely wrong. PhDs is a sign that your knowledge has been dissipated and your IQ has been sucked out of your brain. Our educational system does not convey knowledge, it destroys it. But, you know, and this is, Nikos here has a PhD and so do I. So I think we're both testaments of at least experiencing what they tried to do to us, if not succeeded. But this is part of what I find with libertarians. Of course, it's about knowledge. It's all about knowledge. Knowledge is everything. And knowledge does lead to more morality. You can't compare, you can't expect somebody 3,000 years ago to come to the same conclusions that we come to today. It's about data. It's about thinking. It's about knowing what works and what doesn't in the world. It's about morality and learning from reality what is moral and what is not. It's all about that. I mean, this is where religion comes in. God did not just send us all the data that we needed. We're in the Old Testament or the New Testament or whatever the latest version of a statement happens to be. No, we have to constantly learn from reality to figure out what works and what doesn't and what's good and what's not and what's right and what isn't. So of course, we have a lot more data than we had 250 years ago. We know now, for example, how reason can shape industry and can shape our lives and can shape our standard of living and quality of life. We know the impact of all kinds of ideas because they've been tested and they've been tried out. The sad thing in the world is that people don't learn from history and from their own knowledge. They don't take it seriously because they shape their understanding based on their morality, based on their ethics. And this is why it's so important for us to be teaching and conveying a new view of morality so that they can take reality as it is, not shaped by the perversions and distortions. I mean, even the idea of buying votes. I don't think the European Union is doing it to buy votes. I think they're doing it because this is what their philosophy demands. Now, they're also buying votes because everybody agrees with their philosophy, but they've basically destroyed the concept of rights philosophers have for the last 100 years. They basically says a right is something that you're granted by the government. It's not something inherent in human nature. And therefore, they make up rights because they want the government to have a greater and greater impact, not just to buy votes, partially to do that, partially because they're power hungry, partially because philosophically they believe that you, Tom, cannot take care of yourself. You don't have the competence to take care of yourself.  Now that's a very deeply philosophical view about human nature, but human beings, about epistemology, who can tell what's true. That has to be challenged. The only way to challenge that is philosophical. We have to adopt a philosophy. Otherwise, we can't win. Back to the question of constitutions. Look, at the end of the day, you get the government you deserve in a sense. That is, if the people don't live up to a particular standard, they're not gonna, no constitution will stand the onslaught of bad culture, of bad people. Politics is indeed downstream from culture, but culture is downstream from philosophy, so everything is downstream in that sense from ideas. But what a constitution does, even in a society, a good constitution does, even a society that's corrupt like the United States, what it does is it slows it down. The status, that's why in Europe, you can have 400 rights. I think your constitution articulates 400 different rights. You can have that because there was no founding constitution that had the American language. So you have hate speech laws in Europe. You can't have that in the U.S., even though probably 55% of the population want hate speech laws, you can't do it in the U.S. because the constitution is still there. So the constitution slows down the deterioration. It doesn't eliminate it. It's still gonna be there. We're still gonna get less and less right, but I will take a country with a good constitution any day over one without one. And ideally, if you have good ideas, you still want a constitution just in case people forget the ideas. You want something to limit government, even when we're a little lazy and don't have the full diligence in terms of keeping our eyes on what it's doing. Another question from a friend related some way to Scotland. Are we going to need another renaissance in these islands, let alone Scotland? Or can the Enlightenment pick up where it left off? So Tom, you mentioned that Scotland was the epicenter of the Enlightenment in a way there was a Scottish Enlightenment. And yet today we see Scotland being the world capital of the nanny state.  So how do we change this? Can we still use that steam from that Enlightenment, or do we need a new renaissance? And how would that look like? That's the most important question. Well, I think it can't take place without two things happening. First of all, just to let people know that that act of parliament, it was called the named person. And what they wanted was to put a state guardian in every family. So the state would be the third parent in the family. Now that was defeated. The Supreme Court in the UK knocked it down. However, it hasn't gone away. They're gonna come back with it because it's what they want to do.  That is now an act. So you can, in Scotland, you can be, you can be imprisoned for what you say in the confines of your own home, and you can be imprisoned for what literature that you own in your own home. So that's the situation we're in. So in terms of getting the like, people in Scotland don't even know that prophets have no honour in their own household. People, if you asked a hundred people in Edinburgh, even though he's stat you stands here in Edinburgh, if you asked people in Kirkcaldy, across the water, where he's from, who Adam Smith was, I would hazard a guess, maybe one in 50 would have an idea, maybe one in a hundred. Really? It's not something that we that we teach in the schools. And here is the first problem. Unless people in Scotland start to withdraw their children from the state education system, there really is little hope because the state has your children from the age of five years old until they're 16 years old. And that's a lot of time and a lot of propaganda. I mean, it's an onslaught. They spend more time indoctrinating children than they do educating them. Unless you withdraw your children from that system while you still can, because they are looking to go down the road of Sweden and Germany and make homeschooling a criminal offence. Unless you do that while you stick in, there's really no hope because how else? How are you going to compete with the state propaganda machine that is constantly telling your children what it wants them to know? So do we need a continuation of the Enlightenment? Absolutely. Do we need an Enlightenment revolution in Scotland? We absolutely do. But I think the first thing that needs to happen is people who have any awareness of what's going on to remove, I mean, I know Libertarians who still got their kids in the state education system. We complain about the state education system. We complain how bad it is. And yet during lockdown, all people could say is, when are you going to let the kids back into school? When are you going to let the kids back into school? Really? What did your kids ever do to you that you want to send them back into the state education system that you complained about on a day-to-day basis? So that's one thing we need to do. And the other thing is to try and get control of taxation. While the government has the ability and the right to take your income and take your property at will, it's a very difficult thing to fight against. So I think we need to grip on those two things, the state education system and the state's ability to tax people at will and to take the property at will. So then why those accession terms? So wouldn't it be then that you would secede into a socialist island basically? So you go from a very bad non-state which is the UK to the hotbed of socialist authoritarianism that would be Scotland? Yeah. I don't, for a start, I don't think that the United Kingdom is going to be, in the end, any guarantor of not going down that road. They're making their own way to these ideas. You know, it's happening. They're just behind Scotland in terms of implementing these things. They have their own versions of these acts that are currently being formulated in red and parliament. And yeah, I get this idea. Well, look, Tom, an independent Scotland is going to be even more left-wing probably. And yeah, and I fear that. But do you know what? It might need to happen. It might need to get worse. People might need to see what socialism actually looks like and feels like before they actually get it. Because we've never really truly had it in Scotland the way, you know, you talk to Poles, Hungarians, Romanians, they know what socialism looks like. They know what it is. Here in Scotland, we still have some romantic idea about what socialism is.  Yeah, they pose, they posture this morality. It's about taking care of the weak. When really it's about digging, keep putting your hand into the pot and doing nothing to earn it. You know, Judas banged on about how your money could feed the poor because he liked to dip his hand into the pot and steal from it. You know, he didn't really care about the poor. And most socialists are the same. They don't really care about the poor. They just see it as a way of empowering themselves and enriching themselves. So I fear a socialist Scotland as much as the Unionists do. But I think the idea that the UK will prevent it is feeble. And in the end, I think we might need to go through that, unfortunately, in order to experience exactly what it looks like. Right. Thank you. Jaron, do you want to comment or shall we go to more questions? I'll just say, you know, I'm against this balkanisation and every little ethnic group having their own state. Apart from Israel. Yeah, well, Israel's a problem. I mean, it's I don't think it's healthy. I don't think it's good. This is part of the problem. It's part of the problem in the world right now. We don't have universal principles. And, you know, Tom gave the perfect example of why I think Scotland should stay in the UK. And that is the UK Supreme Court overruled a really, really, really evil law that the Scottish government passed. Now, it's true that in 10, 20 years, maybe the UK will be in the same place. But at least you buy yourself 10, 20, 10, 20 years of that. And I also would challenge this idea that people learn once they experience socialism, they learn and they become better. God, I wish that were true. But we've had what 42 different socialist experiments in the world so far. Anybody with eyes can go and look and see and and and and it's exactly there and nobody learns. Nobody learns and you get mired in there. So the slower your progress towards socialism, the better. And it strikes me Scotland would, you know, would benefit enormously from not rushing into the hands of the of the socialist right now. Who knows what will happen in 10, 20 years as the UK tries to catch up. Maybe you'll have influence and the UK turns around. I don't know. But very, very dangerous. And I generally see this splitting up of the world into into small political units as a negative and not a positive and something that will create a lot of problems down the road. You'd agree, though, that if Scotland gained independence with the declared principle that we want to be freer, then you would be in favor of such a cessation, no? Yeah, I've, you know, if, you know, that's a fantasy, though, and we know it's a fantasy. And what does it mean? What does it mean? We want to be freer, right? You know, braveheart, which of course was also about Scotland. He yells freedom. What was the freedom? I want to be ruled by Scottish King instead of be ruled by British King. Who the F cares? What king you ruled by? What matters is not to be ruled by kings. That's what freedom means. Freedom means abandoning the kings. So if Scotland, you know, what we have to, I mean, this is part of the problem. Part of the problem is we don't even own the definition of freedom. Even the definition of freedom is in dispute. I don't consider the ethnic group being able to vote for their own dictator, an issue of freedom. Okay, now we go to the last stage of the show, which is my favorite one, which is the one difficult question to each one of you. So the question, the difficult question from Kevin Kahn is actually from the audience. So, oh, before that, one of our friends says to paraphrase Rand, there are no conflicts of interest among men who want to be free. So maybe he means our two panelists today. But let's go to the difficult question for Kevin. If abortion is killing, what is the correct punishment for violating the rights of the unborn? And this question is to you, Tom. Well, it'd be exactly the same punishment as violating the rights of the born.  Should be life, should be ten years, whatever we decide the punishment is for that, then it should be exactly the same 10 minutes before they're born, if it's a deliberate act of homicide. So that's in my society, that's in my group of people who want to carry out that. Somebody else may disagree. I'm prepared to force that contractually in my group.  That's fine. I have no issue with separate communities carrying out their own forms of punishment on if it's contractual. Let me push you a bit more on that, Tom. So what is the community down the road, though? Let's take it to the logical, let's say they say we contractually agree to Sarialo. But what about that community next door? These guys are not Sarialo. So what if then, let's say your contractual agreement becomes weaker and weaker and weaker, and the Sarialo contractual agreement becomes stronger and stronger, or the Christian fundamental is whatever. So what's your defense then to that expansion? Well, if I have the right to defend myself, I have the right to arms, then I can defend my own borders. Okay. So yeah, good luck. Come and try and take what's mine. If I give me an FN file, I'll defend my own borders. Don't give me it. Let me buy one. Okay. So Yaron froze, and I don't think it's because he froze from the answer. So let's see. And he froze just before I asked the difficult question to him. Oh yeah, that old trick. Okay, Razi, have you got any message from Yaron? Is he coming back? Actually, before he comes back, let me ask what somehow I wanted to ask Tom. Oh, here he is. Okay. You're still new to Yaron. I was complaining about you guys' weather, but we just got hit by a tropical storm. It's crazy outside, and the internet went down for two minutes. So, I was just about to ask your difficult question. So we asked Tom's difficult question. So the difficult question for Yaron is, so someone would say, okay, you spend so much energy against libertarians or whatever. If Ron Paul was president, and if let's say we had the senate of Ron Paul's and the congress full of Ron Paul's, wouldn't you get 97% of the things you'd want from politics as you'd envision them? You'd be free to pursue your happiness. What's the problem? Well, I mean, the two problems. One is I don't think Ron Paul can win because of the arguments do not address people's actual concerns, and you can't win in a vacuum. But more than that, no. I mean, for example, Ron Paul has expressed his pacifist views about anti-American views in foreign policy. I think it would be disaster. If he won in terms of, for example, the kind of terrorist attack that we experienced in I think the weather interfered again with Yaron. So I can't accept that Ron Paul's anti-American and I can't accept that point.  I agree that he's not a pacifist, but he does believe so. So he puts more moral blame, let's say, for 9-11 on the American foreign policy, rather than on the people who perpetuate it. I don't believe that. Yeah, I mean, it's not, yeah, I'm back. It's not just a foreign policy. It's, you know, for example, Ron Paul would probably ban abortion, which I think would be horrific. Yeah. He would leave it to the states. Let's be just. He would say, I leave it to the states. Yeah. Well, when it when it push came to shove, I think, and I, you know, if Tom and Ron Paul really believe abortion is murder, then the Supreme Court dominated by their thinking would rule that it's a violation of rights and would ban it from the state as they as they should. Look, my view is unequivocal. If abortion is murder, it should be banned from anybody. You don't, you don't make exclusions for murder. You don't say it's a state issue, whether you don't approve of murder or not. Murder is a universal violation of individual rights and the federal government should uphold it. But look, I think what would happen if Ron Paul got elected is he would be a disaster. It would ultimately, his whole libertarian world would collapse. And as a consequence of that collapse, capitalism would get a bad name for 100 years. I hope that when we got a good name. Well, granted, I give you that. I hope that when we ultimately win, and when we actually have politicians implementing some of these policies, they do so in a credible they do so in a in a in a sound kind of way. And they have policies that not just the policy is a sound, but the reasoning is sound. They can explain it and therefore they can pull it off and generate the kind of outcome that we all believe is possible. But, you know, I haven't recently gone through the one Paul thing I used to, but Ron Paul's views on a bunch of different things. Not my views. Sorry. And I believe that, you know, it's a bad example because I believe there are quite a few libertarians who would do a better job than Ron Paul does. But I think part of the problem would be that there would be a lot of infighting among libertarians about what to implement because it's not obvious, right? As we listed, there are kind libertarianism is not one cohesive, coherent political idea, even in politics, cohesive ideology, never mind more broader. So instead of fantasizing about a Ron Paul victory, which I don't think will happen, particularly now Ron Paul, he's a little old, or any libertarian victory in our lifetime right now, it's just not going to happen. You're not going to see it. Let's focus on building a society. Let's focus on building the foundational ideas that will make liberty and freedom sustainable in the future. And I think those foundational ideas are philosophical, I think they have to be, I don't know any other philosopher other than I ran on which you could ground them. We've tried to ground them on John Locke and Adam Smith, not good enough. Sorry, not good enough. They went a long way towards it, so we couldn't have got where we are today without it. But we have a great leap forward, and that great leap forward is Ayn Rand, who I think completes the project of the Enlightenment. What we need is to take our ideas seriously. And I think libertarians do themselves harm, do themselves and do the cause harm by not taking Ayn Rand more seriously, and that's it. Gentlemen, we're out of time, so thank you very much. So, Tom, do you want to tell us something where people can find more about libertarian part of Scotland and what you're doing these days, and so what do you want people to know? Okay, you can check out the Scottish Libertarian Party at www.ScottishLibertarians.com, or you can follow us on Twitter at atskollibertarian. So, gentlemen, thank you so much. Many thanks to our superchatters. A big thank you to the Ayn Rand Institute for supporting this series, and Tom, Jaron, thank you very much. We'll see you all next week. Bye-bye. Thank you.


Ezra. Launch Firefox. Ezra. Type Twitter. Typing your request. Hey, Minecraft. Read grocery list. List grocery has five tasks on it. Cereal, eggs, bread, milk, chocolate. Hey, Minecraft. Show clock. Success. Hey, Minecraft. Turn off weather. As you wish. Hey, Minecraft. Tell me about artificial intelligence. To be dear for artificial intelligence. Hey, Minecraft. Play white nice for five seconds. Hey, Minecraft. What can I substitute for chili powder? Give me some time. I'm looking up the substitute for chili powder. Found three substitutes for the ingredient. And they are one TSP chili oil or two TSP paprika or one TSP cayenne pepper. Minecraft. Send power to the television. Minecraft. Set the lights to energize. Hey, Minecraft. Run a speed test. I have your results. It was 28.5 milliseconds. The download speed was 33.43 megabits per second. And the upload speed was 20.45 megabits per second. I am running Minecraft Core version 18.2.6 beta. You are on the latest version. Hello, my leaf is green there. Hey, Minecraft. Navigate to the coffee shop at 12th and Alder. I have planned around, but I suggest we stop for gas. Do you have a gas station preference? Set the lamp to concentrate. Set the lights to concentrate. Minecraft, it is too hot in here. I am lowering the temperature for you. Woo! Woo! Thank you.


Welcome to the Tick-Mill Update. I'm Kiana Daniel, the founder of the Investiva Movement. Last week, Boris Johnson won big in the UK's general election, and Jeremy Corbyn apologized to Labour supporters over his party's heavy defeat. On the other hand, the U.S. and China reached an agreement on a phase 1 trade deal that includes some tariff relief and agriculture purchases. Next week, we have a range of economic data to look forward to from the UK and Canada's CPI to the Bank of England rate decision to the U.S. GDP. Today, I'm looking at the pound-yen pair, which, as we kind of saw it coming, continued its bullish run and almost reached the key resistance level of 148.64. Well, it missed by only .64 points. We have talked about how difficult it has been for the pair to break above this resistance level in the past two years, but this time around, we may actually see it happening. However, we do expect a temporary pullback before the bulls regain energy. Of course, trading in the financial markets involves a risk of loss, and you should only trade the money that you can afford to lose. If you like this video, give it a thumbs up and subscribe to the Tick-Mill YouTube channel. I'll get back to you with more updates tomorrow.


Today we are opening the first three legendary collections ever made what's up guys today We will be opening the first three legendary collections ever made the other two are binders So they're obnoxious to put on the screen, but we have the legendary collection three UEs world This is one of the coolest ones because it has some awesome goat format reprints So I'm really excited to open this one But we do have a quick giveaway these three original print cards All you have to do is like this video be subscribed and let me know your favorite of the three legendary collections They're all pretty cool All right, so we're going to open these up real quick then we're going to hop into it Okay, so we have the legendary collection binder here. These binders are obnoxiously large But they are extremely cool because they're the original 2010 binder So this this binder came out as I said 2010 they later reprinted it as a game board Similar to the UEs legendary decks one or not decks with the legendary collection UEs world one And it made it a lot easier to actually open But this one is a lot cooler to be honest because you have you know the guide cards in here I'll leave them in there for now because we already know what those are You know we've seen the guide cards before so let's just pull out the packs and the other promos So for our promos, we have the blue eyes the red eyes and the dark magician No surprise there and just the classic cards Then we have one of each of the first no it's not the first five We have the first four and then we have dark crisis and invasion of chaos Yes, this is not master collection like yesterday that was the first six Legendary collection two was very similar to legendary collection one as it came in the binder And then later they reprinted it in the game board and like 2018 I think I remember when that happened. I was really excited because I never opened the set So let's open up this and I'm really hoping that I know a lot of people are hoping that they do The same thing with Yu-Gi where they have the unlimited print out for a long time But they haven't actually done like a reprint. I don't think like they did with these So I hope they will do that and give us some access to those really cool goat sea Careers even though they are not first edition They're still really cool. So the first editions can kind of hang on to their value You got to like open this thing legit like pull it out of this sleeve That's actually really cool. I don't think I've ever opened one of these now that I think about it All right, very nice. Let's go like that It has styrofoam in it. Oh my goodness. It's legit. All right, so it's got styrofoam That's pretty cool. Yeah, I've definitely never opened this now that I think about it The promos are all in their own little thing Yeah, they definitely improved the binder from the first one to the second one Just in terms of logistics and how they put it in here So we got five of the mega packs. These are extremely cool. They have some really cool stuff So this is first edition. Some of the stuff is actually really valuable So it's pretty nice and then we've got the the promos and of course you get the sacred beasts And finally we get the legendary collection through you use world The difference between this one and the unlimited is this is a window right here Where there's actually a car the seal for calcos in here On the other one, it's just a print like a picture and it's just part of the front Okay, let's get into this thing These are first edition too and man some of these legendary collection you use world first edition cards Like dark magician girl and dark paladin all that stuff they get really expensive This is gonna be a fun opening for sure I mean, I think legendary collection is one of the coolest Lines of product that konami's ever made in my opinion. I really like them dark necrophere I think it's even cooler when they're like reprints sets then just reprints of the originals I think the originals are really cool I take that back because if we didn't have reprints of the originals We wouldn't be able to open them all so easily You also do get a game board in here and of course the card But we're not gonna pull all that out right now We're just gonna get into the opening We didn't have a ton of packs here. We have six original packs We have legendary collection two five packs and I think five of the legendary collection three These are all very high quality packs. They're very nice stuff So let's see what we can pull. Let's start off with my favorite one The legendary collection three yugi's world pack I'm looking for some sort of cool goat format secret rares Of course the dark magician girl is a really big one. Exodia is in here as a secret rear So we're looking for all that stuff Here we go. We have a chain disappearance Here are our first edition cards horse the black flame dragon These would be like really cool tomb canon soldier to do like a A sealed only kind of thing with this set There's a lot of really fun cards to play with tomb canon card Cannon card cannon soldier, okay Breaker the magical word there you go There's a goat format card an ultra rare breaker That's got to be a worth at least a couple of bucks. That's very nice I know this one's worth a lot because torrential has gotten a pretty expensive recently And secret rare first edition. That's a very good one. Oh, that's awesome. And it looks so good I mean torrential already looks good just that I really like that artwork. It's very simple It kind of looks like ice to me. Um, I think that looks really nice White horn dragon. We've got the magical dimension. That was we got two horses in the same pack That was a heck of a pack. Let's leave these up already off to an incredible start We have legendary collection too. I kind of I'm getting really excited. I didn't really like Realize I was like, oh, yeah, these are some of my favorite sets I want to actually get into the opening Crystal beast cobalt eagle in here. We can get like superpoly The elemental heroes come in secret rare like the vanilla ones which are our alternate art and stuff It's really cool Gateway the six and then some of the big ones too and cyber and dragon cyber dragon alternate art cyber dragon regular art I think yeah, there's a lot of good stuff bubble shuffle Elemental hero electron not not one of the favorite elements with heroes probably Glad to hear to beat the quarry. I always pull at least one of these when I'm opening this Destiny and dragoon. Okay, pretty decent pack. Okay, we got the bubble man There's a lot less cards than that one. I feel like nine cards versus. Oh, it is nine cards. Okay, never mind I take it back. All right. What do we want to open here? Let's go with the dark crisis first It was probably one of the least exciting of the six. I mean, it's still a great set And I mean we pulled shinado the other day. I'm grading that one by the way We will have a ps a return video with like seven cards. So I'm pretty excited about that Arsenal summoner. We've got the agito The yaku guy or panda dark scorpion may the thorn Infernal queen archfiend. Okay, vile pond archfiend. Oh final countdown. These are sticking together. That's actually a pretty decent common Let's continue on the yugi's world train. This has been our really good one so far Man, I love this set set so fun. I've never opened first edition. I think this is the first time Guardian trice. We've got the draining shield mystic box monster reincarnation Beckoning light. Okay. I don't think that one's too good Secret rare. Here we go. There's here's where the big ones come up Feather of the phoenix not the one we're looking for reckless greed. It's a cool super rare It's not a bad card you can get to draw two but then you don't get to draw two for two turns All right, legendary collection too These are very brittle like they're opening very easily compared to those uh ocg pack side opener master collection Man, this is like a a dream the fortune. We've got the infernal gainer We've got the uh, what how do you say that the gnosp? Is that the case silent? I don't know Ooh rainbow dragon. That's pretty cool. That's a nice card and Shogun shin that is a cool one. I do like that card. Uh six samurai's are always pretty awesome. That's a pretty Oh elemental hero dark bright Boom, there we go. Let's not get too crazy, but there's the prisma. I think prism is actually an okay card All right, let's get into the spell ruler pack. Let's pull some epic cards Like relinquished if you guys saw I love playing with relinquish one of my favorite cards to use whip tail crow Gravekeeper servant that card is extremely annoying for sure UFO turtle jigging bocking on wall shadow and peacock legendary collection three I think there's one extra pack here. So we might have to do a double round for the original sets real quick So we don't get ahead Okay, we have swift guy of the fierce night. That's a cool comment to be honest giant soldier of stone my boy The dark door this card's pretty annoying too. It's a stall card Queens and I there's a throwback to the queens and I there's king's court stuff for you solemn judgment secret rare and boganean Okay, we are getting some absolutely awesome secret rares Solemn judgment is always going to be a very nice one first edition secret rare talk about some nice trap cards All right, yugi's world. I see you. That's pretty good. Wow. This has been really nice so far All right legendary collection too. Can you live up to the hype of three? Can you pull us something epic because I know there's a lot of epic cards in here Blade was a blade master. Okay plasma vice crystal beacon Light in dragon. It's a pretty cool one and Best CR we're gonna be playing gladiator beast after that. We got inferno marine neos judgment dragon as a common In bubble man. That's pretty cool. Not fantastic, but still pretty cool I think gladiator beasts do have a little bit of value. It's just so pretty cool. They are cool cards for sure I just hate gladiator beasts. I hate playing against them respect play You got the volcano of all not fall flame jv. What am I talking about attack and receive The gravity bind got a little bit of an error on the name and a gust slight error very slight Don't get triggered by that invasion of chaos. Let's keep going Blackluster soldier. I'm gonna say it every single time until we pull it one day stumbling desk kangaroo. We've got the pinch hopper The blazing impachi's got that zero defense Compulsory evacuation. I can't speak today Terri King salmon I had to like restart the intro like 10 times because my voice kept catching. I was like what is happening right now Okay, we still got six packs left in this opening been pretty fun so far solemn warning common Man Yugi's world is just so good. All right. There's a dark sage common. Let's set that over there Dark sage common too. That says that's just really cool blackluster ritual Curse of dragon Kings knife we're getting the whole set and Sinister serpent actually a really cool one for goat format Summon skull super rare Wow, that's got to be at least something just for the fact that it's summon skull That's pretty cool. I mean secret rare sinister server. It's really nice That's probably the second best version behind the original game promo the game promo is amazing. All right legendary collection too We haven't hit anything huge out of here. I would love a cyber dragon or a big element or an even a vanilla element So here six samurai era. We can play some six sams after this crystal right gecki crystal promise Hydra get on a classic and Fifth hope we have the ultimate rare first edition of this. Oh, wow, that does look good as a seeker rare phenomenon That's also a very cool one. All right. We got lady heat and hero heart. All right. Not the best pack But still really cool metal raiders One of my favorite sets pro actually does my favorite set to be honest gigatec wolf Can we get the canyon moth labyrinth tank saggy the dark clown? punished eagle dark elf Oh cocoon my cocoon of evolution prevent rat mystic lamp and gazelle the king mythical beast All right. No, but can you moth this time? That's okay. Three more packs in the opening Can we pull an epic secret rare or anything epic chain destruction? Let's pull that dark magician girl source of dark magic is a common in here, which is really cool dna surgery Black illusion ritual. There's also some random comments that are with like eight dollars I know horus level eight is like worth eight dollars for some reason as a regular comment not even a rare all right Fire princess that's that card's pretty interesting and mystical space typhoon I mean talk about awesome cards gravity bind as a super rare if you ever want to play your stall strategy Uh in hollow version. There you go. This is such a nice secret rare too The secret rare is a little bit hard to see on the first editions when they made the unlimited print They actually made the secret rare look better somehow. I don't know how they did it, but it was really really nice So that's still a really good pull though two more packs Legendary collection two Let's pull this guy. We've got a miracle kids voltik glonios proto cyber dragon And a gladiator beast hoplumus. Why is that a secret dini crop? That's a good super rare actually But why is hoplumus a secret rare? We pulled three gladiator beasts out of the five the five secret rare slots That's crazy and the final pack of the video. We have legend of blue eyes white dragon the 2010 Packs look a lot different than the new reprints. I mean just look at this. It's so light. It's very interesting Can we end this off with a blue eyes white dragon? I would be totally okay with it to be honest I would not be mad at all. Once can I open this thing? There we go all right We've got the machine conversion factory. This sucker adds 300 attack or defense to a machine type monster. That is unbelievably powerful We have the monster egg a warrior hidden within an egg that attacks enemies by flinging egg shells I've never read that that's actually really funny lesser dragon. He's incapable of breathing fire So he's lesser that is just messed up dragons are very judgmental. That's all I gotta tell you Oh, why is it always dark hole yesterday in it with a dark hole today in it with a dark hole I've ended so many openings with a dark hole. It's not even funny So if we want to destroy all monsters on the field, we've got that covered another dark hole. That's hilarious Oh my goodness. Well, I hope you guys enjoyed that Legendary collection one through three opening. I certainly did that was really fun to open Maybe I should get more of those if you guys have any of the unlimited prints Or even some more first edition maybe hit me up and maybe we can do this again, especially two and three I really enjoy those. Shout out to tcg trusted cards toe and foe show tomato juice stanley magnance and mimic gecko Thank you guys for supporting the channel. That's it for this video. I'll see you guys later peace