Budget notebooks like the Aspire 3 are the backbone of the market, as its many incarnations sell like hotcakes, making for the bulk of the profits for the Taiwanese manufacturer. Can it be your next device? Today we're answering that question. To keep a lower price point, the Aspire 3 comes in a plastic chassis. The design is minimalistic with only a tiny Acer logo on the lid, while the finish on the surfaces feels good. On the other hand, durability is far from great, as both the lid and the base flex like crazy. The more force you apply, the scarier it gets, so be careful. The plastic keeps the laptop light, with a weight of only 1.78 kg and a profile of 19.9 mm. What's startling is that the lid can be opened with one hand. The rubber feet on the back work as a lever, so the base is slightly off the ground, so there's extra air going to the cooling. On the base, the keyboard does a good job, as the long key travel and clicky feedback, leading to a decent typing experience. Sadly, there's no backlight. The touchpad has a smooth surface and a large size while being responsive enough for a budget device. Going to the input output, the left side houses the power plug, a LAN port, an HDMI connector, and two USB Type-A 3.2 Generation 1 ports. On the other side, there's one more USB Type-A port and a 3.5 mm audio jack. The display isn't anything special, but it fits the laptop. The full HD IPS panel has great viewing angles and a decent max brightness of 296 nits. While it only covers 56% of the sRGB color gamut, it's not really needed for a budget machine. If you're getting the laptop for studying and whatnot, our display profiles can help you, especially our office work profile, which makes texts more legible, in case you're typing your fingers off every day. We'll have them linked down below. The speaker setup is found on the bottom, and it's not very good. There are deviations across the entire frequency range, while the max volume is pretty low. Only 2 per 100 people watching this video are subscribers. If you decide to just start following us, we'll be able to reinvest more in our laboratory thus making even more helpful videos for you. Thank you, you're awesome. The Aspire 3 can be found with the Core i3-1215U, Core i5-1235U, or Core i7-1255U. We tested the Core i5 and it does a great job, performing similarly to the VivoBook 15 with the same CPU while being better than the HP 255G9 with the Ryzen 5 5625U. The CPU also doesn't need a chunky cooling setup to work properly, as one fan and a heat pipe do just fine. In the stress test, the Core i5 is able to maintain a TDP of 40W for around half a minute, which is pretty good, while settling at 28W in the long run. This also means that it will be able to handle P-Series CPUs if they are ever offered. Comfort is okay, as the single fan remains quiet, while the keyboard is kept cool as well, thanks to the exhaust vent being far away from it. The battery could have been bigger, with Acer offering only a 43Wh unit. It lasts for 7 hours and 24 minutes of web browsing, or 5 hours and 47 minutes of video playback, so you better bring the charger with you. Thankfully, it's rather small so it won't add any noticeable bulk to your bag. On the other hand, Acer kills it with upgradeability, offering two Sodom slots for up to 64GB of DDR4 memory, as well as 2M.2 slots. Only the one on the right works with the faster generation 4 drives, so keep that in mind. We'll leave our teardown video down below, which shows how to open up the Aspire 3, for when it's time to upgrade. The Acer Aspire 3 is a classic budget laptop. It doesn't have any fancy features or gimmicks, however, it gets most stuff right, which is enough to warrant a recommendation. The hardware inside performs well and runs cool, while the storage and RAM are replaceable, so what's more to ask? If you want to know even more about the Acer Aspire 3A3 1559, we have a separate review on our website, which goes in further detail.


Do one of our favorite fall recipes, pumpkin dump cake. So what you're going to need is a 12 ounce can of evaporated milk, a 15 ounce can of pumpkin, a cup of brown sugar, three eggs, three teaspoons of pumpkin spice, one cup of butter melted, heath pieces or toffee bits covered in chocolate, a cup of graham crackers and one yellow cake mix. So first you're going to stir together your first five ingredients. So the pumpkin, make sure we get it all, the milk, the evaporated milk I guess, the brown sugar, your three eggs and your three teaspoons of pumpkin spice. You're just going to mix this all together really good. You could probably do it quicker with a hand mixer, but we are just going to mix it by hand today. This is probably one of our most favorite recipes during the fall months in October and November. Anything pumpkin just tastes so good. So once it's all mixed together, you're going to spray with cooking spray in a 9 by 13 pan. You can at least spray mine so it's good to go, but you're just going to dump it right on in there. The edges, sprinkle the cake mix on top.  This gives it a little chocolatey goodness right on top. And then over top of everything, you're just going to drizzle your butter. You'll bake it in an oven set at 350 degrees Fahrenheit for about 45 minutes. And here's what it looks like when it's done. Perfect treat for fall, pumpkin pie dump cake, and it's delicious. Be sure to check out this recipe and other fall recipes on SixSistersStuff.com. Thanks for watching.


All right. Welcome, everyone, to today's Webmaster Central Office Hours Hangout. My name is John Mueller. I am a Webmaster Trends Analyst here at Google in Switzerland. And part of what we do are these Office Hours Hangouts where webmasters and publishers come together and we can discuss topics all around web search and websites. As always, a bunch of questions were submitted already. We don't have a lot of you here live at the moment. I just wanted to talk about one thing briefly before we move on to the questions. As you've probably seen, we did a blog post about Search Console, some of the changes that are coming up in Search Console. Last year, we started moving to a new platform in Search Console. And for us, for the Search Console team, this is something that they've been working on for quite some time. And it's something that we have to get complete more or less towards the end of year at latest. So our goal with the blog post, with some of the changes coming up, is to make sure that we inform you all as early as possible so that when things change or go away in ways that we think might affect you, we want to let you know about that as early as possible. Change, I think, is always a bit of a hassle, especially when you have processes that work fairly well and someone goes off and changes the tools or changes the data that's provided in the tools that's always a bit frustrating. So some of these changes we can't avoid. Some of them we think we should have done way in the beginning when we started with Search Console, knowing now, if we had known then what we know now, something like the canonical change that we announced this week. So I realize sometimes this is a bit frustrating, but we hope we will have a fairly nice path going forward. And we want to really inform you early and let you try things out early so that you're not too surprised when things do change. We do also have a lot of really neat stuff lined up. And by shifting to a new platform and removing some of the old features, a team has a lot more time to actually move forward and create new and fancy stuff. So what you can do there, if you feel strongly about certain things that are either going away or that are missing or that you'd like to see in a new tool, make sure to use the feedback feature in Search Console. And don't just go in there and say, I really want this, but rather give us some information about what you'd like to see from that. What are you trying to achieve by having this new feature or having the same thing as we had in the old one in the new one? Because giving us a little bit more information there helps us to figure out, how do we need to prioritize this? Is this something that we may be missed, something that we should have thought about early? Is this something that maybe we can provide a better way to give you that information or to help you do that thing than we had in the old tool? So make sure to go into the feedback tool, send us information, give us feedback on what you think you'd like to see differently. Some of these things we'll be able to do. Some of them might take a little bit longer because we really need to first clean out all of these old things that we've collected over the years and move everything over to the platform. So for some of that, I'd love a little bit of patience, but it's also fine to let us know vocally if there's something that you feel really strongly about. So don't be too shy. All right, so with that, I guess we can go to questions from you all to start with. If there is anything on your mind that you'd like to talk about before we move on to the submitted questions. Hi, John. Hi. Recently, we faced a very interesting issue. We found one of our client websites, the way they build the website, there is no paragraph tag. All are h1, h2, h3, h4 tag. So they use heading 4 tag instead of p tag. They use sometimes, but very little amount of tag. So like their main content of the website, they use heading 4 tag for the main content of the website.  Because there is no paragraph tag. All are heading 4 tag or heading 2, heading 3, heading 1 tag. I don't see a big problem with that. I mean, obviously, like you, since you noticed it, it's probably something that would make sense to clean up. But it's not that we would say this is a negative effect. But rather, what you're doing there by saying everything is important, you're telling us it's all the same importance. So it's like everything is important. Therefore, nothing is particularly important. So we have trouble kind of understanding the context within the page. So that's why mostly I would clean that up to make it more that we can figure out which parts are really important and which parts are kind of the normal text. And that way, we can understand these pages a little bit better. I don't know if you would see a direct ranking change because of fixing that. But it makes it easier for us to figure out what the page is really about. At this point, the ranking is pretty much good. But we are expecting that if it cause any issue in future, that is a musty. Now, I don't think this would be something that we would see a spam or something that we'd see is problematic. It's really just you're not giving us as much information as you could be giving us by telling us this is really important and this is kind of normal content. Thank you. All right. Any other questions before we get into the submitted ones? Nothing? OK. Cool. That's fine too. Maybe things will come up during the course of the Hangout and we can get into those. All right. The first one is about Search Console. We keep getting random broken links in Search Console. I wonder what we should be doing there. Redirecting them or leaving them as they are. So I don't know what random broken links you're seeing there. That might be something to maybe post in the forum to get some advice as well. But in general, if you see a link pointing at your website that doesn't work at all, then it's fine to return 404 for a URL that doesn't exist. That's kind of what the 404 status code is for. And that's something that our systems work well with. So if there's a URL that never existed, return 404. That's perfectly fine. On the other hand, if you see that there are links coming to your website that are pointing at URLs where you can guess what they meant and maybe they just have a typo or an extra dot at the end or something like that, then those might make sense to redirect, especially when you're seeing people going through those links, because that seems like something where someone tried to recommend your website, but they didn't get it perfectly right. So you might make sense to redirect those to the correct page instead. I think for both of these situations, that's something where you can also look a little bit at the traffic through those URLs. If a lot of people go to those URLs, then somehow that's encouraging, because people are wanting to go to your web pages, then it might make sense to figure out a way to determine what was meant with this link and where could I point it? Where could I redirect people to? What factors might cause a piece of content that's been syndicated on a partner site to rank well? This is despite the fact that the canonical is set to the original content on my site and has been there for several months. Is there a matter of site or niche or authority? What are we doing there? I think this is always a tricky situation. We do try to figure out which page is the most relevant for some of these queries and to point users directly there. But if these are completely separate websites and they're just posting the same article, then there's also a lot of additional value from the rest of the website. And that could be information on that specific page. It could be additional value that the rest of the website brings, where when someone goes to that one article, maybe they go off and look at other things on that website. Because otherwise, that website is also very nice. So that's something that can always happen. And if you're syndicating content, that's something you need to take into account, that it might happen that the content that you syndicated to some other website ends up ranking above your content. That's not always completely avoidable. So those are kind of trade-offs that you have to look at there. I think the canonical is a good way to let us know that these two pages belong together. But it's also the case that a canonical isn't really correct in a case like this, because the pages themselves might be completely different. It might be that there is this block of text that's the same across both of these pages. But it might be that there's a lot of other content around that page that is completely different. That could be user comments. That could be kind of the rest of the website itself. So again, that's kind of a trade-off that you have to look into. It makes sense to bring the information out to a broader audience by syndicating the content. But on the other hand, you have to take into account that maybe these other websites will rank above your website when it comes to search for that specific piece of content. Google is reporting our expired product pages as soft 404, these URLs redirect to relevant alternate product with a message saying that the product they wanted is unavailable. Is the redirect causing a soft 404 or the content of the redirect page? So I suspect what is happening here is that our algorithms are looking at these pages and they're seeing that there's maybe a banner on this page saying this product is no longer available. And they assume that that applies to the page that the user ended up on. So that's sometimes not really avoidable there. If you're really replacing one product with another, it might make sense to just redirect. If one product is gone legally and no longer available, then I would ask that in kind of the soft 404 state where you say this product is no longer available. Does Google consider a backlink in rankings of videos in the video carousel on Google? I think we looked at this question last time already, so I'll skip this here. How long does it take for Google to recognize hreflang tags? Is it possible that Google first indexes from Switzerland and shows a CH version of a website under the German TLD? So we don't actually index content first from Switzerland. Our crawlers and most of our systems are more located in the US rather than in Switzerland. So I don't think we would prioritize Swiss content over other content. But what happens with hreflang links in general is kind of a multi-step process. First, we have to crawl and index those different versions of the page. Then we have to index them with the same URL that you specify within the hreflang markup. And then we need to be able to follow that hreflang markup between those different versions of the page. And to do that, we need to have that confirmation back as well. So it's something that does take a little bit longer than just normal crawling and indexing. We have to kind of understand the net between these different pages that are all supposed to be part of this set of hreflang pages. So that's something where it's probably normal for us to take, I don't know, maybe two to three times longer than we would to just crawl and index an individual page so that we can understand the link between the hreflang versions. And again, there is no preference for Switzerland over other countries in Europe. I think that would be nice from just for me personally, from an kind of egoistic point of view, but it wouldn't make sense in the kind of global area in general. We do try to treat all websites the same. So just because a website has a CH version doesn't mean that would automatically rank above a German version. So the other thing with hreflang is, for the most part, it doesn't change rankings. It just pops out the URLs. So that should be, I think that's kind of known. Let's see, I recently changed my site's domain from this one to another one. 301 redirects are in place. Change of address has been initiated. I am still seeing the old URLs and index. It's been over three weeks. Is that normal? I had some issues with 301s not being active for a week after the migration happened, but they're active now. For some queries, both the old and the new site show up in the search results. What could I be doing differently here? So the 301 redirect is really what you should be watching out for. It's important for us that the 301 redirect is on a per-page basis, so all of the old pages redirect to the same page on the new website. We have all of that covered in our information in the Help Center for site moves. So I would double check that and kind of go through step by step and URL by URL even to see that this is really working the way that it should be working. The other thing to keep in mind is we crawl and index URLs individually. So we don't crawl the whole website at once and then switch things over. We do that step by step, and some of these pages are crawled and indexed very quickly within a couple of hours. Some of them take a lot longer to be re-crawled and re-indexed, and that could be several months. So that's something that could be playing a role here as well, where maybe we just haven't had a chance to crawl and index and process the redirect for all of these pages. So there's still some that we've only seen on the old website and some that we've already seen on the new one. That could be playing a role here too, especially if you're looking at a period of three or four weeks. That would be kind of normal. And finally, what also plays a little bit into this is something that SEOs and webmasters find really confusing, in that even after we've processed the redirect, if someone explicitly looks for the old URL, we'll show them the old URL. So that's a little bit confusing. Our systems are trying to be helpful here and say, well, we know this old URL used to exist, and we have the new content here, but we'll show it to you because that's specifically what you're looking for. So for example, if you do a site query for the old URL, even maybe a year after doing a site move, we can still show you some of the URLs from your old website with a site query, even though we've already processed the redirect for those URLs. So when you change your site name, for example, you'll see within the site query, you'll see the old URLs with the new site name that's mentioned there. And from our point of view, that's working as intended. We're trying to help the average user who is looking for a URL for a webmaster who just did a site move, that is a bit confusing. So I don't know if that's something that we will be changing, but in general, I think that kind of makes sense. John, regarding migrations and search console, I noticed that even if there's a site move or there's no site move, I just redirect all there. When you're looking into the old domain, the domain that is now redirected to a new domain, I noticed in one case that errors start popping up. And I looked at the errors. It said submitted, but not index. It had an oindex tag or something like that. But when I entered the actual URL, it did redirect me to the new domain, which indeed had an oindex tag. So it looks like when you're using the URL inspection on the domain that redirects, it returns the results for the target URL that it redirects to. Is that intended or is it is a bit confusing because you're thinking, oh, my god, the redirect is not there anymore? Why isn't it saying it's redirecting instead of? Because Fetch as Google used to just tell you, well, this is just redirecting. That's it.  If it's. OK, so if you use the live test, I imagine? Yes. Yeah, OK. The live test and the just normal. I mean, the index test, I think, makes sense because we see the final version as kind of the state that we would index. So I think that kind of makes sense. But with the live test, that would be a bit confusing. So I don't know. I need to figure out what is happening there. That seems like something where we should be showing a redirect status rather than just blindly showing the final state. So you mean the basic URL inspection just entering the URL and submitting it, it should show the final version, the results based on the target redirect. But when I hit the this live URL, it should show me it's redirected. Is that? I don't know if that's what it does at the moment. I think that's how it would make sense so that you can actually debug these kind of redirect situations. I do wonder now, though, if it's specific to the noindex that we follow the redirect and we say, oh, noindex is worse than telling you a redirect is there. But I don't know. I'll double check to see what is happening there and follow up with the team. Yeah, this is one of the URLs that's doing that. It is redirecting. And I just tested it now both with the URL inspection and the live test. And it just shows me there's a noindex tag because there is noindex tag on the final. OK. Cool. That sounds interesting. All right. How does Google Search bot view website personalization? We have a new product layer that the website allows personalization based on industry, location, even to a single company. This allows us to really kind of adjust the content. I think we looked at this one last time as well. But just to kind of give a quick answer here, the important part is Googlebot mostly crawls from the US. So if you serve different content to different countries, Googlebot would probably only see the US version of the content. We would not be able to index different versions of the content for different locations. So if there's something that you want to have indexed, make sure it's in the generic part of your website so that Googlebot is sure to be able to pick that up. You're welcome to use personalization to kind of add additional information all across the page. But if you want something to be indexed, it should be in the part of the page that is not tied to personalization. I'm wondering how much a very low performance rate in web.dev is affecting Google ranking of a website? I don't know. So web.dev is a really cool tool that pulls together the different tests that we have in Lighthouse and gives you scores on those and kind of guides you through the process of improving those scores. So when it comes to speed, things that you need to watch out for, things that you could try. And over time, it tracks the progress of your website kind of as you're going through the different content on the tool there. So that's something that I think is generally a good practice to go through and to kind of work through. But it's also something that these are good practices to follow, but it doesn't mean that they will automatically result in a higher ranking. Or similarly, if you have kind of low scores here, it doesn't mean that your website is ranking terribly because it's not following the best practices. So there is kind of an aspect of, on the one hand, if your website is so bad that we can't index it properly at all, which might be the case with a really low SEO score in Lighthouse where we can't access the URLs. Or there are no URLs on this page and it's just a JavaScript shell that we can't process the JavaScript for. That could have a severe effect on your SEO. But on the other hand, if it's just a matter of your site being a little bit slow or not being perfectly optimized, I don't know if that would cause a significant effect on your website. So my recommendation here is to look at the advice that's given in tools like web.dev. Think about what you can implement. Think about the parts that you think are important for your website. On the one hand, for search engines, of course. If you're asking this here, on the other hand, also for users, because ultimately, if you're doing something that improves things for your users, then that will have a kind of a long-term trickle-down effect on the rest of your website as well. The URL inspection tool and search console has been giving us different info concerning our URLs in the user's declared canonical field. One day it's not available. The next day it shows a given canonical. Can you give us some insight into why this is happening? Is there a difference between user-declared canonical not available and user-declared canonical none? We've seen both appear in the tool for URLs that have canonical tags on them. I don't know. So some amount of fluctuation can happen as data is being reprocessed. So that might be happening, especially if a URL is completely new. It might be that we just haven't processed the canonical yet and that we'll get to it there. But this isn't something where you should be seeing things fluctuate back and forth. So usually it's more that, oh, we don't know yet. And then the next state is, oh, we do know, because we've been able to process it properly. But it shouldn't be going back and forth. If you are seeing that it's going back and forth, it would be really useful for us to have some sample URLs and maybe some screenshots so that we can take a look at that with the team here to figure out what exactly is happening here. With canonicalization, sometimes it's a bit tricky because it can change over time as well. So as much information as you can give us there really helps us to figure out what we can do to improve that, to make it more useful. Can Google decide whether or not to show information of the structured data organization? So I don't know what you mean with structured data organization, but in general, we do have algorithms that try to figure out why it makes sense to show structured data as rich results in the search results. And when we feel that maybe it doesn't make sense, or when we feel that maybe we're not 100% sure about this website or about the way that the structured data is implemented on this website, and we'll be a little bit more cautious. So that is something where if you provide valid structured data markup, it's not a guarantee that it will always be shown exactly like that in the search results. Mm. I have a problem with a long-term client of mine. I think it's a legal website. I took a quick look at that before the office hours. And from my point of view, it does look a little bit weird. So I passed that on to the team here to kind of review, to double check that everything is working as expected. I imagine it's always a bit tricky with websites like that to figure out how they should be handled in search. But I passed this one on to the team to double check. Question regarding the website structure and multilingual, multi-regional configuration, should I worry about the URL parameters configuration when splitting the domains by folders to separate services in Search Console? So I think on the one hand, I think it's good that you're looking into these kind of issues. On the other hand, I am kind of worried that you would have different configurations for a website by subdirectory because that sounds like maybe you're not doing something that clean with the URL parameters in general across the website. So that's something where I don't know the website here specifically, so it's really hard to say. But it sounds like you have different parameters that mean different things or that can be ignored or that shouldn't be ignored, depending on the individual kind of subdirectories within your website. And on the one hand, that should be possible. We should be able to deal with that. On the other hand, if there are situations where we can completely ignore individual URL parameters and in other cases where these exact same parameters are critical for the content, then that feels like something where our algorithms could get confused and say, well, we always need to keep these parameters or we never need to keep these parameters and then suddenly parts of your content is missing or parts of your content is indexed multiple times. So using the URL parameter tool definitely helps us in a case like this. But it feels to me like it would probably make more sense to try to clean up these URL parameters in general and find a way to have a consistent structure for your website's URLs so that algorithms don't have to guess or that algorithms don't have to figure out, oh, in this particular path, this parameter is important. And in these other paths, we can ignore it. Any time that you're adding so much additional complexity to the crawling and indexing of a website, you kind of run into the situation where maybe things will go wrong. So the easier you can keep it, the cleaner you can keep it, the simpler you can keep it within your URL structure, the more likely we'll be able to crawl and index that site without having to think twice. And as always, there are other search engines out there. They don't have the URL configuration tool, the data that we have there. So they wouldn't be able to see that. And you might be causing problems on those other search engines. Or perhaps it also plays a role with how your content is shared on social media. So all of these things kind of come into play here. So my general recommendation here would be not to spend too much time trying to fine-tune the URL parameter handling tool for all of these different sub-directories, but rather to take that time and to invest it into thinking about what you would like to have as a URL structure for the long run and thinking about the steps that you would need to get to that cleaner URL structure. I'm hoping to get some insight on an issue that I posted related to content being de-indexed as duplicates, submitted URL, not selected as canonical. I also took a look at this one before the Hangout. And it also looks a little bit weird. So I'm trying to see what we can work out here with regards to those URLs. I saw that you provided some sample URLs. That's really, really helpful. That's what I took and passed on to the team here to try to figure out what we can do there to make that process work a little bit better. So in general, what I think is happening here is for whatever reasons our algorithms believe that these pages are equivalent and that we can fold them together. And because of that, we pick a canonical from one of these pages. And it looks like looking at the pages manually in a browser that they're actually quite different pages. So folding them together would not make sense. Therefore, selecting a canonical from this set would also not make sense. One of the things that I've seen in the past that have led to something like this is when we can't render the content properly, when we can't actually access the content properly, when we basically see an empty page, then we see, oh, well, this is the same as the other empty page that we saw. Maybe we can fold them together. So offhand, that's kind of the direction I would take there to think about how is Google thinking that these pages are equivalent? Is it possible that maybe in the mobile friendly test, like they don't have actual content? Could it be that I'm showing an interstitial to Googlebot accidentally and only that interstitial is being indexed? What might be happening here? I didn't have a chance to look into it in that much detail here yet, so it might be that something like this is happening on your side. It might be that something weird is happening on our side and we need to fix that. But that's kind of the direction I would take in a case like this. I want to navigate my customers a little bit better on my website. I want to make sure that this wouldn't confuse Google. I think it kind of goes on into I like to set up my URL structure to have a domain and then category and then product in a path, or maybe I set it up differently, what should I do? Which URL structure should I pick? From our point of view, you can use any URL structure. So if you're using a kind of a path sub directory structure, that's perfectly fine. It's important for us that we don't run off into infinite spaces. So if you use URL rewriting on your server, that it's not the case that you can just add the last item in your URL and just continue adding that multiple times. And it always shows the same content. But it should be a clean URL structure where we can crawl from one URL to the other without getting lost in infinite spaces along the way. You can use URL parameters if you want. But if you do decide to use URL parameters, like I mentioned in one of the previous questions, try to keep it within a reasonable bound so that we don't, again, run off into infinite spaces where lots of URLs lead to the same content. But whether or not you put the product first or the category first, or you use an ID for the category or write out the category as text, that's totally up to you. And that doesn't have to be aligned between your e-commerce site and your blog. That can be completely different on both of these. So I think it's good to look at this. But on the other hand, I wouldn't lose too much sleep over this and rather just find a URL structure that works for you in the long run, in particular one that you don't think you need to change in the future. So try not to get too narrow down and pick something that works for you, works for your website. Last Hangout, we discussed the carbine tips and another website to see if they had related problems because you're also having trouble ranking there. I took a look at this one before the Hangout. And I don't think there's anything related between those two. I also passed that on to a team to take a quick look at to see if there's something maybe otherwise stuck that we can help to get unstuck. But otherwise, they're completely separate websites and treated individually. We're developing an application for Angular Universal. With some sections, we want to change the appearance of the URLs in the browser, but keep it the same on the server side. So for the server, it would be luxury goods, leather bags, but the user would see just leather bags. Is there any problem with this in Angular Universal using dynamic rendering? So just from a practical point of view, Googlebot doesn't care what you do on the server. You can track that however you want on your server. The important part for us is that we have separate URLs for separate pages that we have links that Googlebot can click on that are kind of A elements with an href pointing to a URL that we can follow and that we can access these URLs without any history associated with them. So if we take one URL from your website, we can copy and paste it into an incognito browser and it should be able to load that content. And if it loads that content, if you have proper links between those pages, then from our point of view, how you handle that on your server is totally up to you. Using Angular Universal with dynamic rendering or if you have something of your own that you set up, that's all totally up to you. That's not something that we would care about. It's not something we would even see because we see the HTML that you serve us and the URLs that you serve us. My website fetches individual web pages, which are not interlinked through an API, but no links are displayed through clicks. It has a search box where every individual page shows search results is Google is successfully crawling all links as valid via sitemap. Does Google see this as a valid practice because links and millions will harm rankings or freeze ranking? So there are lots of aspects in this question where I'd say this sounds kind of iffy. There is some things that sound kind of OK. So if Google is already indexing these pages, then something is working out right. In general, I'd be careful to avoid setting up a situation where normal website navigation doesn't work. So we should be able to crawl from one URL to any other URL on your website just by following the links on the page. If that's not possible, then we lose a lot of context. So if we're only seeing these URLs through a sitemap file, then we don't really know how these URLs are related to each other. And it makes it really hard for us to be able to understand how relevant is this piece of content in the context of your website, in the context of the whole web. So that's one thing to kind of watch out for. The other thing to watch out for, I think, is if you're talking about millions or pages that you're generating through an API with a search box and just submitting those via sitemap file, I'd be kind of cautious there with regards to the quality of the content that you're providing there. So in particular, if you have product feeds, if you're using RSS feeds to generate these pages, if you're doing anything to automatically pull content from other websites or from other sources and just kind of republishing that on your site, then that's something where I could imagine our quality algorithms maybe not being so happy with that. And similarly, if this is all really completely republished from other websites, I could imagine the web spend team taking a look at that as well and saying, well, why should we even index any of this content? Because we already have all of the content indexed from the original sources. Like, what is the value that your website is providing that the rest of the web is not providing? So that's one thing to kind of watch out for. I don't want to kind of suggest that your website is spammy. I haven't seen your website. But it is something that we do see a lot. And it's something where as a developer, you go, oh, I have all of these sources. And I can create code. Therefore, I can combine all of these sources and create HTML pages. And I'll have a really large website without doing a lot of work. And that's really tempting. And lots of people do that. Lots of people also buy frameworks that do this for you. But it doesn't mean that you're creating a good website. It doesn't mean that you're creating something that Google will look at and say, oh, this is just what we've been waiting for. We will index it and rank it number one for all of these queries. So it might mean that it looks like very little work in the beginning because you can just combine all of these things. But in the end, you spend all this time working on your website when actually you're not providing anything of value and then you end up starting over again trying to create something new again. So it looks tempting to save a lot of work in the beginning, but in the long run, you basically lose that time. So it might make more sense to figure out, how can you provide significant value of your own on your website in a way that isn't available from other sites? We're facing an issue where lots of resources couldn't load due to the same page not getting rendered in the snapshot for Googlebot. While debugging these issues, we couldn't find a solution and Google is marking them as other error. What could that be? So this is also a fairly common question. What is essentially happening here is we're making a trade-off between a testing tool and the actual indexing. And within the testing tool, we try to get information as quickly as possible directly from your server. But at the same time, we also want to give you an answer fairly reasonably quickly so that you can see what is happening. And what tends to happen here is if you have a lot of resources on your pages that need to be loaded in order for your page to load, then it could happen that our system is essentially time out. And we try to fetch all of these embedded resources, but we don't have enough time because we want to provide an answer to you as quickly as possible. So you end up seeing these embedded resources not being pulled, and you see an error in the live rendering of the page like that. When it comes to indexing, our systems are quite a bit more complex, though. We cache a lot of these resources. So if we try to index an HTML page, we'll know all of these CSS files we've seen before. We can just pull them out of our cache. We don't have to fetch them again. We can render those pages normally, and that just works. One thing you can do, or maybe there are two things you can do to help improve that for the testing tool and for users in general, on the one hand, you can reduce the number of embedded resources that are required on your pages. So instead of having 100 CSS files, you throw them into a tool, you create one CSS file out of that. That's one thing that you can do. That makes sense for both users and for search engines. You can do that for JavaScript as well. You can minify the JavaScript. You can combine things and make packages rather than individual files. I think that's a good approach. The other thing is if you're seeing this happening for your pages and you don't have a lot of embedded content, then that's kind of a hint that your server is a bit slow and that we can't fetch enough content from your server to actually make this work. So that might be a chance to look at your server, your network connectivity, and to think about what you can do to make that a little bit faster, so that these tools don't time out, so that it's also faster for users as well. So in both of these cases, the net effect is that users will mostly be seeing the speed improvement. But the side effect will also be that you'll be able to use these tools a little bit better because they tend not to time out as much. OK, thanks, John. That's my question. And for that, I think most of the pages are just happening for almost all the pages. And one of the things that we are observing in those resources itself, those 60% are the images. That's something that we are required to kind of load to show to Google as well as for the users. And we are not able to figure out why is it happening. We are using CDNs and the kind of better servers for those specific resources. But still, we couldn't understand why is it still happening. So they are kind of, it's something, it's not something. Our friend is loading. We're doing lozzy learning for those images, which are not coming the first four. But still, we're not able to understand why I meant for each URL with each resource that is happening. So that's something we're not able to debug. Yeah. So what I would do there is try to use some other tools to figure out, is this really a problem on your side somehow that things are a little bit slow? Or is this something just on Google's side that we tend not to have as much time to fetch all of these individual resources? So what you could do is use the Chrome developer tools. What is it, the network tab that you have there to figure out how many of these resources are being loaded, how long does it take? You can use webpagetest.org. It also creates a kind of a waterfall diagram for your content, also listing the time that it takes for those test URLs and the size of the resources that were to return. And by using those two, you can kind of figure out, is it the case that it just takes 20 seconds to load my page with all of the embedded content, with all of the high-resolution images? Or is it the case that these testing tools, say, my page loads in three or four seconds with all of the embedded content? Therefore, it's probably more an issue on Google's side. I don't have to worry about it. OK. It sounds like something that we should have a little bit more information on in the Inspectorial Toolbow so that you can understand the difference between you have to fix something or Google has to kind of find more time to fetch things. Hello, is this working? Yes. Oh. John, first of all, I want to say a very good early morning from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Oh, wow. It must be middle of the night. That's not morning. Hey, my client's website was one of the strange websites. And I've never used this before, so I didn't know how to chime in. Is there a means through which I would be able to get any type of feedback after your team has checked it out? Ideally, if you have a forum thread in the Webmaster Help Forum, we can post something there. In most of the cases where we escalate things internally, it's not a case where we would be able to give you any kind of additional information back, unless there is really something that you need to change on your side. Sometimes it's just a matter of, oh, we need to fix this on our end, and we'll try to get that as quickly as possible. So it's not always the case that we have something explicit that we can bring back to you. All right, thank you very much. All right. Any other questions from any of you? John, a really quick one. So this is from both me and Ramon. So we're working on building this new website on this other domain, and we wanted to make sure that there's no connection to the existing one just to rule out any issues further down the road. And that one basically has a very, I don't know if it's a 404 page or it's a 201, but it doesn't have any content yet. What worried us a bit was that when we did a few weeks ago, we did an info query. It actually showed the current site like the main. And we noticed this was probably because the non-dab-dab-dab version was still redirecting to the domain while the dab-dab version was accessible. So we removed the redirect, and it seems like the info query shows the correct domain now. So I was just wondering if there's anything we might need to check in order to make sure there are completely separate from Google folding anything together? Offhand, it looks like that landing page is kind of indexed normally. So I think that's looking pretty normal. You're not seeing any connections to the current site. I don't see anything there. I mean, what I do see is there are some search pages that maybe used to be indexed, but yeah. Yeah. Well, as long as there's nothing related to the current site. I don't see anything that would be like a red flag. Cool. We don't even have a red flag anymore. We have a special color flag. It seems like everyone here today has special flags. And I don't know. I mean, on the one hand, it's awkward to have some of the special cases come up because it always feels like maybe there's something broken on our side. On the other hand, it's better to know about these cases and to figure out what we can do to improve them and to know what we can do to improve the communications around these kind of cases. Maybe there are things that we can highlight in Search Console, for example, or send out messages on Search Console if there's something that people could be doing differently. So I think it's always useful to see what all is happening. Thanks. Cool. Hey, John, might I ask one more question? Sure. I've noticed as a result of the last several updates that have been coined the Medic update, I've seen some websites that no longer show on the first page of search results for their own company, for their own brand. And I was wondering, why in general would that be? What is Google not liking that other websites that reference websites are on the first page, whereas the actual website itself is not on the first page? I think that's always a bit tricky. There usually are two aspects that are involved there. One is more an issue, especially with newer websites where the website name or the company name is more like a generic query. So if, for example, the website's name is Best Lawyers in Pittsburgh or something like that, then on the one hand, that might be the company name. On the other hand, if someone were to type that into Search, we would probably assume that they're not looking for that specific company, but rather they're looking for information for that query. So especially with newer companies, that's something that we see every now and then. We see that in the forums where people are saying, oh, I'm not ranking for my domain name. And then their domain name is something like, I don't know, BestVPNProviders.com. It's like, well, it's a domain name, but it doesn't mean that you will rank for that query. So that's one thing. When it comes to sites that are a little bit more established that are out there already, usually it's more a sign that we just don't really trust that website as much anymore. So that's something where we might recognize that actually people are searching for this company, but we feel maybe the company website itself is not the most relevant result here. Maybe we feel that there is kind of auxiliary information about that company, which is more important that users see, first, which could result in something like this happening. Usually that's more a matter of things kind of shuffling around on the first one or two pages in the search results. It would be really rare that something like that would result in a website not showing up at all in the first couple pages of the search results. And I think that's kind of what you highlighted there with your question. And that's something where I think, well, even if we didn't trust this website as much anymore, then we should at least have it somewhere in the search results, because if we can tell that someone is explicitly looking for that website, it would be this service for the user to not show it at all. Like for maybe for generic queries, one could argue maybe it's not the perfect result. But if we can tell that they're really looking for that website, at least we should give the user a chance to see that website as well. So that's kind of why I took that and said, well, maybe we should be catching this a little bit better. I don't know if our algorithms are correctly understanding how trustworthy your website there would be. I don't know the website. So that's really hard for me to judge. But even if we think that it wasn't trustworthy at all, maybe we should still show it somewhere in the search results on the first page. Thank you. Yeah, over the last several algorithm updates, for some reason, have been getting the idea that Google no longer trusts the website. And I've been trying to figure out why that is. But I agree that clearly, if the business has a unique name and people are looking for that business, then that's kind of what they should see. So thank you. The other thing to maybe look at, if you haven't done so already, is look at the quality radar guidelines that we have. There's a lot of information about trustworthyness in there. Some of that is worth taking with a grain of salt. It's not that we take that one to one and use that as a ranking factor. But there are a lot of ideas in there, especially when you're talking about a topic that's kind of a legal website or a medical website, then it does make sense to show users why are you providing this information? Why should they trust you? All right, so let's take a break here. It's been great having you all here. Thanks for all of the questions and the comments along the way. Like I mentioned, I sent some of these sites off to get reviewed. I don't know if there's anything specific that we would get back. Some of you also have forum threads. So if there's something that I get back where people are saying, well, this website should be doing this differently or should be doing that differently, then I'll try to get back to you in the forum thread there on that as well. All right, then with that, I wish you all a great Friday and a great weekend. Hopefully things are nice on your side of the world and we'll see each other again, maybe in one of the future Hangouts. Bye, everyone. Thank you, John. Bye.


Live from Las Vegas, Nevada, it's theCUBE at IBM EDGE 2014. Brought to you by IBM. Welcome back to Las Vegas everybody. This is Dave Vellante with Jeff Frick and we're here live at IBM EDGE. This is day two of our wall-to-wall coverage and this is theCUBE. theCUBE is SiliconANGLE's flagship program. We go out to the events. We extract the signal from the noise. We've been talking about the channel quite a bit this week. We're talking to technologists, executives and really have a focus on the partners. The channel is vital. We've said a number of times on theCUBE that there is really a land grab going on for good channel partners. Not just people who can move hardware but people who can understand a customer's problem, understand business value and how to tap into that business value and help customers transform. Bill Jones is here. He is with Jessica. Bill, welcome to theCUBE. Thank you. So you've seen a number of changes over the years. You were an IBMer for a number of years. What do you make of all this? You've seen this transformation of the industry, transformation of IBM, your former company and I'm sure your new company has transformed as well. We are. It is pretty impressive that IBM is such a large company that in the past it seemed like slow to change but they are making a rapid transition into and actually leading the market instead of following the market. So this conference today and yesterday has been pretty eye-opening for me. Over the last couple of years we've seen acquisitions and divestitures from IBM even over the last decade but it's kind of hard to put it all together and really understand the value and where it's going. This conference the last couple of days has really opened my eyes in terms of why the transition, what the acquisitions and divestitures are kind of aligned to do and how IBM is going to address a rapidly changing market and not just follow it but lead it into that change. So talk a little bit about JustKel, your current firm. What's your focus and area of expertise? JustKel is a nearly 20 year old IBM reseller. We are focused on the federal marketplace about 70% of our business is federal. We do both, we sell IBM hardware and software but we also develop solutions and self-solutions into the federal space. So talk about some of the unique requirements of the federal marketplace. I mean, when the economy turned down, did your business turn up, for example? It certainly chugged along, it didn't turn down. It didn't get crushed. Well, I mean, you can look. I mean, the whole battle over the budget every year but the government spends a fair amount of money and when the times get tight the government tries to spend more money. So our business has been strong. We've had year-to-year growth for three of the last four years and this year it looks like another strong growth year for us. So yeah, sometimes your business is counter-cyclical, isn't it? It is, the government puts money in when no one else is invested to keep the economy rolling. So now one of the other things, of course, that you saw, I guess it was sort of mid-last decade. Maybe the middle, latter middle part of the decade was the sort of cloud first, right? Vivek Kundra came in and said, okay, we're going cloud, cloud, cloud. There was a bit of a backlash to that but it was an imperative that was put forth. So how is that sort of cloud mentality seeping into the solutions that you guys sell because not everybody wants to put all their data in the cloud. In fact, most people don't want to put all their data in the cloud. So how are your clients replicating that capability? Well, initially we saw customers that they had an issue. They really had to move three applications to the cloud. That was kind of the mandate. And they picked the three, two or three logical ones. They picked the email and they said, all right, we'll move the email. Everybody kind of jumped on that and moved quickly. They're kind of pulling back on moving to a public cloud. There is some interest in private cloud and right now the big focus is only to get cloud ready as opposed to, or cloud enabled as opposed to cloud deployed. I think we're going to see a move to private clouds. We saw a couple of large private cloud procurements this past year, but overall most customers are enabling themselves, not deploying it. Bill, can you dig down a little bit into that? What does that mean to be kind of taking the baby step to cloud? It sounds like, how do you start getting cloud enabled? What are some of the priorities or changes that they need to make? Well, so I'll take one step back and say some of it is more hype than it is substance. So they want to virtualize first and foremost. I mean, if you virtualize and you can say, okay, my application is virtualized and my infrastructure is virtualized, then I can deploy it in a virtualized cloud environment. So server virtualization kind of went early on. Today it's software virtualization and I think there's a big, people have large databases that are on proprietary architectures today and they realize to move into any kind of a cloud-based infrastructure that they need to get off of a proprietary hardware base and move into a virtualized environment. So software virtualization is the next big step that our customers are looking at. Some are starting to deploy it, some of them are still okay, I'm going to pay lip service to it, but they're getting there one step at a time. The government's not the fastest to transition, but they are moving. Yeah, and at the same time, the government, you talk about, some things are overblown, you're inside the Beltway. There's a lot of hype around government initiatives. We talked about cloud, but you know you had the sequester, everybody was freaking out about that. You got NSA and Snowden, now everybody's freaking out about that. You got the Affordable Care Act. How much of that is real versus just sort of press hype? Talk about that a little bit. The customers, the IT community kind of kept moving on. I mean, I don't think that there was, the boat didn't rock and nothing got knocked off the ship. So in general, it was a lot of noise around the community, but it really wasn't a big disruption to the community. So it really hasn't affected your business? It hasn't affected our business at all. We had, the sequesters are a little bit discharging, but they didn't last forever. So I mean, that was, as long as they move past those and they're not year-long events or six-long events. Now you guys also do some work in the high-performance computing area. I wonder if you could talk about that. It's an area that we look at because we see high-performance computing and the cloud and big data kind of coming together. What does that mean from your perspective? So we recently won a procurement at NOAA, the National National National Geographic and Atmospheric Administration, for a large-scale file system. And it's a total system solution sale that IBM has gone after a number of times in the past and Jaskiel went after in 2006, 2007 timeframe, all unsuccessful attempts because it's a very demanding spec and it's a very cost-competitive award. We won it in 2013 with support from IBM. It's a 62-petabyte file system, one of the largest file systems in the marketplace today. We install it, deploy it, it feeds. It's an interesting application because it collects all the weather data from all the sensors around the world and there's underwater sensors, there's buoy surface-based sensors, airborne sensors. It collects all that data and keeps it as a repository so that customers of NOAA who want to analyze their weather model going forward can go back, pull that data back and say, well, if I made this model looks this way, what would it have predicted and then can track against what it would have predicted versus what it actually happened. So it's a very significant program for the government and it's one that feeds a number of high-performance computing systems throughout the marketplace.  And is that you're at IBM for 40-plus years, is that right? That's correct, yes. And now you're on the other side. I wonder if you can just share some perspective of, first off, I don't think anyone of my age is going to work anywhere for 40 years. It's just not in the cart. It's an admirable thing to have accomplished, but now you're on the other side. So talk a little bit about kind of the different perspective when you're, I don't know if it's one step closer to the customer or that kind of interim step. Well, you know, it's just a, it's a different environment. The decision-making is held within two or three people. So it's a quick decision process. The need for having a great business case and getting it presented to the company and getting it approved isn't there. It's a discussion that people sit around with and make decisions on it. It's a faster-paced environment from that standpoint. So, but it's very similar. I mean, the products that we sell are IBM products. The services that we sell are IBM services or services around IBM products. So it's just a smaller scale, same customer set, and same product set. So not a whole lot of difference. We have to leave it there. Thanks so much for coming on theCUBE. It's really a pleasure having you. And Jeff, thank you for co-hosting. Keep it right there, everybody. We'll be back with our next guest. We're live. This is theCUBE. We're live from Las Vegas at IBM Edge. Right back.


So continuing education is essential. Any business that wants to remain competitive has to have their workforce coming up to speed constantly. And in my case, my classes are about specifications and standards. Those are living documents, right? So you take the class one year, five years later, you're out of date, right? So it's really important to continue developing that knowledge and that understanding. But that's just specifications. The optics industry is very dynamic. The industry is changing constantly, right? The way we make optics, the way we specify optics, constantly evolving. How we use them, what kind of applications we can do.  They don't know what they don't know.


Hi everyone, Joe for jaskiescaserates.com with a big random number block randomized this features 12 teams right here and This unlocks pick your team a 30 There it is. That's how that's how it works right here and Big thanks to Sean Anthony and Carl For finishing it off. There are the numbers right there. Let's roll it Let's randomize names and numbers three and a five eight times one two three Five six seven and eighth and final time three and a five eight times for the numbers one two three four five six seven and Once more eighth and final time. Good luck. We got one down to three All right, Sean with one Carl with zero Anthony with two and Carl with the rest eight nine six five four seven three now Carl zero gets you any and all redemptions for those 12 teams right here including one of one Redemptions Sean Healy. You'll still get live one of ones if any for those teams as well I'm Joe. I'll see in the next video for the break jaskiescaserates.com


Ladies and gentlemen, Madam President of Republic of Korea, ladies and gentlemen, we are now opening the seventh session of the World Policy Conference. Please welcome the President of the World Policy Conference, Professor Thierry de Montbriere, for his introductory speech. Madam President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, since the first World Policy Conference in 2008 in Evian, Korea has been one of its most important partners and its main partner in Asia. This is no surprise, this nation being one of the leading middle powers on the planet, which with the values are similar to those that underpin the European Union. Madam President, your diplomacy is working toward peaceful reunification across the peninsula and recommends that confidence-building measures be implemented in East Asia, what you call trust politics. It also recommends an ambitious policy towards openness for the whole of Eurasia. Korea is a prominent and active member of the most important international organizations and successfully organized the G20, the 2010 G20 meeting. By agreeing to open the seventh edition of the World Policy Conference, which is also a club, Madam President, you showed that the WPC and thus its objectives are welcome in your country. We aim to contribute to improving all aspects of global and regional governance with a view to promoting a world that is more open, more prosperous, fairer and more respectful of the diversity of states and nations. We believe that collective security and balance of power are complementary goods and that although the greatest powers hold special responsibilities for a world order to exist, such an order in the 21st century should not look like a division of the planet into spheres of influence. To that end, regional organizations should be strengthened within the United Nations framework. They should emphasize the role of medal powers such as Korea, which are both eager to dedicate resources to the international system of structural security above and beyond their immediate interests and capable of doing so. Since our last meeting in Monaco a year ago, the state of the world has not improved in any way. The absence of a regional security system in East Asia puts stability at stake in this part of the world. Nonetheless, the diplomatic effort towards closer relations currently emerging between Japan and Korea and Japan and China must be hailed. Well, I did it on purpose. It is indeed a constructive step forward when the existence of these agreements can be recognized and progress nonetheless sought on other issues. In the Middle East, where our civilization is challenged by barbarian forces, there is a glimmer of hope that an agreement will be reached with Tehran on nuclear weapons, which would then pave the way for broader cooperation in a region that has become even more chaotic since the sudden advent of the so-called Islamic State. However, it is a flickering glimmer and the status of domestic politics today, both in the United States and in Iran, do not bode well for a major breakthrough.  Year 2014 has also been shaped by the severe decline in the relations between Russia and the West around the question of Ukraine, with multiple geopolitical and geoeconomic consequences, including the weakening of the European security system built during the Cold War. All that beg for apt analysis. The rise of nationalism and populism is not specific to Russia. It is a potentially serious threat to the lasting prospect of an open world, especially in case of a new major economic or financial crisis. These and other major issues such as inequalities will be addressed at the seventh edition of the WPC, where it will also be our responsibility to strive for a better understanding of how these different issues interconnect. More than at previous sessions, we will naturally take an Asian perspective, though never losing sight of the fact that WPC's sole Lamb European is European. Let me emphasize again in concluding that the WPC, at its annual meeting, which is on a human scale, brings together leading figures from the five continents, political and business leaders, representatives of civil society, academics and journalists in a climate of trust and a spirit of tolerance, to examine, discuss and suggest constructive solutions to major regional and international challenges. It is now my pleasure and honor to give the floor to Madam Bar-Gonye, President of the Republic of Korea. Today, we have come to the conclusion of the global discussion on governance. The first meeting held in Europe was held in Asia, and I think it is very meaningful that the first meeting was held in Seoul. In this meeting, representatives from all over the world and representatives from all over the world said hello to each other. I am looking forward to hearing from the people of the world about the major realities of the Earth, and I am looking forward to hearing from the people of the world. Ladies and gentlemen, today, the world is in a strait like a spider web in a complex relationship between the two worlds. In the past, the work of the countries that had nothing to do with each other has become a time of great influence in our lives. In the threat of the Ebola virus that occurred in Africa, there is a lack of freedom in any country in the world. It is a serious challenge in the life of humanity and the natural disasters caused by climate change. Even the national, religious, and international conflict that has recently been established has clearly shown that it cannot be solved in any country or any country in the world. The international community has been experiencing the 1990s crisis and the Rwanda disaster and has been shouting out, but today, in Syria and Iraq, there is a different kind of humanitarian disaster. Recently, the U.S., Ukraine, and other countries have been trying to solve the problem of international conflict in the Cold War period. The threat of international conflict is also having a negative impact on the world economy. After the 2008 global financial crisis, the world economy has gradually recovered, and the main countries' economy has become long-term and the economy has fallen into a psychological crisis and has not been able to recover the previous level of economic crisis. If the economy is shaken, it can shake the trust of the people, the human rights, and the market economy as well as the universal values of the people. I believe that this is the time when the world needs to solve the problem with the most basic values as one community. We need to take advantage of the universal values of the people and respect the people's rights and respect the people's rights and respect the people's rights and respect the people's rights and respect the people's rights while the global peace, security, and the various ways to recover the global economy are being agreed to. In this process, I emphasized the improvement of global governance, the creation of economy, the regulation of the system, and the innovation of the public sector through the global economy. I emphasized the recovery and shared my sympathies with many normal people. With these normal people being agreed to, I hope that the global governance in the political and economic sector will recover again and that the peace and happiness of the people will be proved again. Foreign guests, please do not hesitate to contribute to the global governance development. Korea is a second nuclear nuclear nuclear war in 2012, and the global cyberspace in 2013, and through the ITO and the I.T.O. General Assembly Committee, we are working with various global governance organizations to strengthen this. Also, for the first time In 2010, I held my fifth G20 summit in Gyeongsang-do, and I played a role in the role of a leader of the developed and advanced countries, and I was a member of the Global Governance Organization. In the past, I experienced the pain of poverty in the wounds of the war, and I still have the experience of suffering in the midst of it, and I am still together with the pain and pain of the earthquake that is going through disaster and disaster. In 2011, Korea was the first Asian country to hold the World Development Organization summit, and it shared many countries and countries with experiences that were transferred to the Suwon Kingdom in Suhaeguk. After 2015, the development goal was set, and it will continue to work on international issues such as the introduction of new technologies in 2020, as well as the efforts to solve international issues. With the cooperation of the international community and the cooperation of the development model of the new technologies, we will continue to work hard to improve the development model of the new technologies. Dear foreign guests, I think it is very important to build trust and cooperation in the Southeast Asian region, including the Korean Peninsula, in order to go to a safer and safer future. The Southeast Asian region has only been in the international community for a few decades, but it is now in the center of the world. The Korean Peninsula is taking over 25 percent of the world's total production, and more than 20 percent of the world's land. The great potential of the Southeast Asian region can be played an important role in solving international problems, such as climate change, climate change, climate change, climate change, and cyber security. However, the Southeast Asian region is now in a state of emergency, and the political situation is becoming worse and worse. This is because the Southeast Asian region has been in a greater development, and the international community is currently trying to resolve the international challenges of the crime. and the limited capacity to cooperate with the United Nations to first and foremost, stop the international trend and encourage the development of nuclear weapons. North Korea's nuclear development is not only a divided half, but also a major issue for the United States and a serious threat to the peace of the world. North Korea is a major threat to the development of nuclear weapons and the unyielding policy of the rest of the world, and the human rights of the people of North Korea, and the humanitarian situation of the people of North Korea. On November 18, when the UN meeting was held in the UN, North Korea was threatened by the human rights barrier, and the North was threatened by the nuclear war, and the North was threatened by the nuclear war, as well as the Korean War. In addition to this, the major historical issues in East Asia and the interception and tension surrounding the sea have continued. Currently, the serious tension and conflict between East Asia are compared to the 19th century Europe, and it is also said to have become the reality of the earthquake. I believe that changing the conflict between East Asia and East Asia is the key to the true Asian world. Dear foreign guests, the news of the conflict surrounding East Asia is taking the place of the conflict between East Asia and Asia. Therefore, in order to solve the complicated conflict, I think it is most urgent to restore trust. The foreign exchange of trust given by the Korean government is starting from the conscious of such a problem, and is largely aiming to fix trust in three directions. First, it is the fixation of trust in the Korean Peninsula. The solution to the problem in East Asia has been divided for 70 years and it has to start with the solution of the problem of the Korean Peninsula, which remains high in the cold war. Last year, while I was in charge of the president's office, I suggested the Korean Peninsula trust process in order to prepare for the happy unification era. As a result of strong cooperation, I kept the peace and stability of the Korean Peninsula and opened the door to North Korea and the dialogue, which is a policy to develop trust based on trust and go out to the East Asian Peninsula. In order to do so, I suggested that North Korea would open a small tunnel to the south, North Korea, and the environment, culture and culture, and develop a unified preparation committee to actually prepare for the unification. In addition to the exchange of civil society groups, it will be possible for the residents of North Korea to make a significant step forward, and the South and North will be able to achieve one common goal. I believe that peace and unity will be possible when the Korean Peninsula will be able to communicate and cooperate with each other, and not be a threat to each other anymore. The important thing is the attitude of North Korea. If North Korea gives up on nuclear power and comes out on the road for the people, we will gather the strength of the international community and support the development of North Korea's economy, and we will be able to take out the traces of the Cold War in the Korean Peninsula. The second is the restoration of trust in the East Asian Peninsula. The East Asian Peninsula, the East Asian Peninsula's peace treaty, is to create a new line of peace and harmony by transferring the irregularities and the occupation of the East Asian Peninsula to trust and cooperate with each other. I think it is important for us to work together with Korea, China, Japan, and Japan who have a unique role and ideal for the cooperation of the East and the West. Korea-Japan government is working together with Japan, Japan-Japan, Japan-Japan, Japan-Japan, Japan-Japan, Japan-Japan, Japan-Japan. The North will be trying to make efforts to create a three-state normal meeting based on the diplomatic talks of the Korean-Japan government in the near future. The United States and Russia will be working hard to develop the peace treaty with the two main countries of the United States and Russia. The North hopes to participate in this. Thirdly, the Korean government is focusing on the U.S. initiative to strengthen the trust and infrastructure of the U.S. region. Through communication and cooperation with the main partner countries, we want to connect the U.S. continent with one continent that calms down the U.S. continent. For this, the Korean government will first strengthen the U.S. initiative through the cooperation between the South and the North. In addition, the U.S. and Russia will create a new growth partner of the 21st-century international society by connecting the transportation and energy network to the U.S. region. Of course, in the long-term, the government and the Ministry of State will also build trust. Foreign guests, if the U.S. initiative is successfully launched by the U.S. and Russia, we will be able to create a new growth partner of the U.S. with trust and peace. In particular, the United Nations of Korea will open a new era of peace and prosperity in the United States, and beyond the U.S. and Russia, it will strengthen global governance and security for the peace and security of the world. In addition, the United Nations of Korea will open a new era of peace and security for the peace and security of the world. I would like to ask for your interest and positive participation in the International Society and today's participants. Through today's meeting, I hope peace, prosperity, and prosperity will be a new global governance for the peace and security of the world. Thank you.


Good morning, everyone, and members of the media. Again, let me recognize the Minister of Foreign Affairs for China and Taiwan, Minister Lee, and also the Ambassador to Salucia, Mr. Degu Chen, and also if I could acknowledge the members of your delegation that are also here with us today. We've just concluded a very good discussion with the Minister with regards to activities in Salucia and also on some global issues. And this morning we're going to continue with the signing of an MOU to help us in terms of our security in Salucia. So at this point I'd like to turn over to my Minister of Security and Justice, Minister Herman Gil Francis, Herman Gil Francis, where you can give a brief outline to the project and what the purpose of this MOU is this morning. On behalf of the government of the people of Salucia, I express immense thanks to the government of Taiwan and the Taiwanese Foreign Minister for your country's continued support to Salucia, and in particular for the support to our efforts in justice and security. As we are aware, Taiwan has supported us in many areas including ICT and agriculture, and this signing is yet another step towards cementing the friendly and strategic relations between Taiwan and Salucia. It is indeed a pleasure to see the broadening of our bonds in areas of justice and security. As we continue to develop as a country and explore new prospects for growth, our police force cannot be left behind. The first world environment we are seeking to create must also be reflected in our approach to justice. This agreement will facilitate our exploration of various areas of mutual benefit and assist us in effectively preventing and combating cross-border crimes and terrorism. We want to see more practical cooperation between the police, customs authority, and international governments where we set up joint investigative teams, depending on the case, to enhance our ability to solve those cases. We look forward to the exchange of personnel visiting for study and training programs as well as cooperation in combating transnational crimes. We also need to create such partnerships in order to tap into the expertise offered by countries such as Taiwan, especially as it relates to the use of technology. As a government, we realize that the issue of crime is multifaceted, and with development in recent times, Salucia has had to find alternative ways to help our police force, especially as it relates to the area of training and border control. Hence, even as we tackle crime as its roots, we must strengthen our force and broaden their experience and training. I believe I speak for all members of our police force when I say we truly look forward to working with the government of Taiwan in this significant initiative. Thank you very much. That's my great pleasure to attend the signing ceremony of the Taiwan Salucia Police Court. This is the first comprehensive law enforcement-related agreement in our two countries, which marks a new milestone in our cooperative relationship. Last January, Taiwan and Salucia signed a memorandum of understanding concerning cooperation in the exchange of financial intelligence related to money laundering. Associated Predict Offenses and Terrorism Financing. This arrangement allows the financial intelligence agencies of our two countries to institutionalize the exchange of information across border financial crimes. Now, with the implementation of the Bi-Level Police Cooperation Agreement, the law enforcement authorities of Taiwan and Salucia can work hand in hand in the prevention and policing of other serious transnational crimes. We will see more changes in the area of personnel visits, training, and the intelligence between our two police officers. Taiwan is aware of the difficulties of the rural San Lucia Police is currently facing in personnel training and equipment upgrade. We are willing to offer our assistance to share our experience. I look forward to successful cooperation between the police authorities of Taiwan and San Lucia for the years to come. Also, I may add, since my arrival yesterday afternoon, I've felt the professionalism of San Lucia Police. They have safely escorted me through the streams of the afternoon traffic. Also, this morning, they did the same on the morning traffic in order to let me from the hotel to get to this Ministry of Finance and Economic Development. And we are really looking forward to further cooperation between our two police authorities. Exactly.


The Marines traveled to a different middle school about once a month, introducing the children to a variety of physical activities and competitions. The Physical Education Fitness Challenge put students like sixth grader Ethan Bernard through a tough course, but with Marines by his side, Ethan can't quit. I think it's cool because it really kind of gives us like the energy because they're really pumping us up. According to the Sergeant Major of Marine Air Logistics Squadron 16, Sergeant Major Jean-Paul Corville. This act of selflessness to give back to the community may end up with unforeseen benefits. I think the Marines are going to walk away with a very good appreciation for how much they are appreciated within different communities. When they come out here, they have all these individuals coming up to them, whether it's the faculty, the staff, the students, thanking them for their service, thanking them for what they do coming out here today.  For Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, I'm Corporal Stephen Posner.


Brian yesterday you delivered news that nobody wanted to hear Luis Severino would need Tommy John surgery What was your initial reaction when you received the diagnosis? Well, I mean obviously after two failed You know rehab attempts this winter. I knew when he went back for a third Evaluation in New York and another repeat of an MRI this time a Dicontrest MRI being part of the equation I knew I just felt that the surgery was in the picture I just didn't know what kind was it a stress reaction was it a you know little bone spur that you know They thought was an incidental finding wasn't playing a part or you know the ligament appeared to be fine But the Dicontrast would confirm or deny that so in the end it turned out to be Unfortunately a Tommy John surgery was there any consideration along the way of giving him that Dicontrast MRI sooner You know I I think the consideration wouldn't have been on round one in December I think it's a fair discussion whether you would have repeated that Utilize that Platform in January I'm not sure if it changes the time frame to be honest when it's all said and done even if you did a Dicontrast MRI in the beginning say December They would have then the first reaction would have been treating it conservatively and buying time backing off And seeing how he responds Because it's a partial tear. It's not like a full thickness tear of the UCL So even though it was found on the back end versus the front end I still think that conservative gap in between a surgery would always have been in play So I don't think it changes the time frame unfortunately either way This was a guy that you expected to play a major role in your rotation You said yesterday that help is gonna have to come from within who exactly do you expect to step up in that rotation? well, I mean We have a number of you know real quality arms interesting young talented pitchers in camp that are you know Obviously starting to find their way to the major leagues and I know when we Unfortunately had to go through this process last year You know we lost Luis Severino and there was Domingo Hermon that popped up in and what he wins 17-18 games for us last year and pitched like a Severino and and that's hard to ask or continue to re-ask for that type of you know Gap filling But you know, there's a lot of people that want to make a name for themselves are gonna get an opportunity You know, it's way too early in camp to kind of speculate speculate But clearly, you know, we got Jordan Montgomery coming back from his Tommy John He looks good early in camp and then you got the kids you got Michael King you got people We already know Sessa, Loisiga People that people don't know already as much on as Debbie Garcia amongst others. So Who and what remains to be seen we got a long way to go Do you expect the fifth starter to start this season to be a traditional fifth starter? Or is an open or more of an option because of the off days and because of the situation that this team is in right now I'd say all things are gonna be on the table as we evaluate the one thing that's probably less realistic is a Trying to figure out if we can navigate a marketplace that doesn't really exist outside The current franchise. That's why I say it's easier to rely on the depth than the first and foremost. So You know Available pitching is so difficult early To kind of secure so, you know, we probably have to navigate this on our own through through the June draft Which is usually the way it plays out But we'll see we'll stay connected with everybody and you know, hopefully we have some good candidates to pick from here in This camp you haven't seen a lot of him in game action, but Jordan Montgomery has said that he has felt good He has felt strong. What stood out to you about the way he has thrown the ball so far this spring. I mean, he's got conviction He's got confidence. He's in great shape and but I say all that it's so early I mean it it's so early and and so We already know what he's capable of because you know a healthy Jordan Montgomery on his rookie campaign was fantastic And and someone that would give us a chance to win every fifth day. So him coming back now and looking healthy and Feeling confident that's the projection that you see early in camp and that's an exciting thing for us So hopefully he can maintain that and and if he is what he used to be then, you know We're in a good place with him.  I just think that we're you know, the one thing About taking advantage of spring training is a you're gonna have various things come up And so we don't want to respond to you know Pressure, you know, we're outside pressures of you know, hey I get this guy playing just because you know Our games don't start obviously until you know the end of March this year and so, you know The ones that count so we just want to take the time if necessary, you know to give judgey a chance to let this you know Shoulder ailment get behind them before you know, we just don't want to keep pushing it really and then wind up costing us late So let's give him the downtime slowly bring him back into it and then turn him loose And so it sounds like everything's going really well his responses to all of it's been going really well And and so we just want to make sure that we don't place something in nothing into something so to speak so But he's jumping at the bit he wants to play so he's had to help He's had we've had to hold him back because I know he's been frustrated by our timeline that we've imposed I was gonna ask you how difficult is it to tell a guy like that? No, we do not want you out there right now We want to take this slow to make sure that you're healthy for the whole season I'm not the one having to have that conversation But I can report that those conversations do have and especially early on you know It's not something he wanted to be dealing with in terms of being held back, you know Yeah, and you want you want to create an environment where the players know you got something say something really so we can react to it And but there's always that fine line where players don't want to say anything because they don't want to be taken out of action either and so But hopefully I think we have a nice harmony going there with all our new personnel and then he knows he's in good hands And and we can just get this thing taken care of in the early stages There's another guy on the mend in James Paxton anything new to report there. How's he coming along good? I mean his you know, I get a chance to see him unfortunately, you know More so because he's off the field right now and doing his rehab and he's he All the verbal is a good. He's going in the right direction. He's responding and hitting all the targets He's supposed to be hitting in his physical therapy So the early outset is that you know the surgery hopefully have taken care of this issue And you know, he'll be back to pitching sooner than later Miguel and do harm is seeing his first action in left field had a few opportunities small sample size right now Obviously, but what are you going to need to see from him to feel confident putting him on this roster? Well, you know, obviously first and foremost is calling cards that bat, you know He's already knocked a home run his first game and again You're not judging anything early, but it's always nice to see him out of the gate that you know the Mickey with the the the ability with that bat is still there to put the ball and play with a hard hard exit velocity And in the air so But more importantly the athleticism on the field I've seen him play third base already in game action and and and you know, that's been nice and and looks good The feedback from Reggie will it's especially on how he's looked in pregame work in the outfield has been very Surprisingly good to Reggie and that he has full confidence that you know, you have a Outfield choice here in his opinion. We just have to see it play in the game But what he's seen in his early work would indicate that this is not going to be a difficult transition for him. So That's what you play the rest of the game is for and and so, you know He'll get an opportunity to show his wares and and not just there. It's first base, too, you know, so he's got a lot of New experiences coming his way and and some of the cut-offs and relays and where he's supposed to be positioned and you know that comes with that type of territory but You know, I've been around long enough to know that if you have a quality bat It reminds me of when Soriano Was with us back in the day. He was a shortstop coming up in the minor leagues. He had a great bat And next, you know, you know, he filled in in for Jeteran short for hamstring and spring training for about 10 to 10 games or so Then we moved him out to the outfield And with no blocks throwing stuff going on then we want to move into the second base We were going to find the bottom line We're gonna find a spot for Soriano and that bat and and to heart reminds me of that It might not be now, maybe it's later, but he's in the competition, but he does have options So but the versatility is gonna serve as well as as we all saw last year is always important with injuries that come Well, you're definitely gonna give us that 26 man roster as soon as you know it, right? Yeah, we're gonna figure out this thing over the course of time But we definitely have some candidates that we're excited about we think could take a shot at it and then you know And easily handle that position for us, but at the same time It's gonna be resolving a revolving door Regardless based on pressure points and season of how certain aspects in field or outfield or catching You know seem to be playing out with injuries. So that aren't DL injuries, but we're IEL injuries But we might have to protect a certain area of the roster and that could affect who that 26 man is at certain times Brian as always. Thank you for the time. Thanks for having me


पाइटन is a high-level programming language, which has several applications in the area of bioinformatics. अब इस मोडूल में हम जे देखेंगे के bioinformatics में पाइटन की क्या application है, at a very, very beginning level. आच आब यहापे हमें एक बात देखने जाएए, के bioinformatics के जब आब बात करते है, तो वहापे data is in sequence format. तो sequence data can be represented in the form of list data structure in programming languages. आब बायलोगिकल डेटा जोई है, वो sequence के format में है, और जो हमारे पास पाइटन है, उस में list का data structure बहुत स्वोंग है, so there is a correlation between these two things, के जब हम data structures को प्रहेंट करना जाते है, in python, तो list हमें help करेगी, to understand or to maintain those biological data sequences. आब बात करते है, आब बात करते है, now we will look at some basic sequence operations and how to read files using python. आब आब �由 блया मैचिन स्काश्ट ईस मरभ पास पैटन मैचिऊंग, बात से कृम मैचिरके रए रहाती है,wear pattern matching with serpent brackets. कच underworld मैं तो वीन में क fot run these religious discourse programs, वर टेडा करते है, आब पास पास पास कृमions with chest of chest of chest, so it has mcb so basically now what will we see we will check that here we have acgct in this pattern so we will know the part that is present here now if this part is present here then we will say that this pattern is present here so basically this is an example, which is taken from a yeast promoter sequence and what to do? so simply we will take this pattern and put it here and it will be like this ज़यसSEQUENCE मैं वा दोड� broken और टिलो़ करतो हिघ्या ईअं से नेभी आप सब ओध एक आरँए Whitneyआ लगउप्रए खये रेव वद कर दीचका अटी रब पसकöstाम隆ji पू ऄप सब भा पनी दोझी नेद आप after ती पार करे लोग भस्में टिलगना जब अप अप इप फास टा थी तो प्रिझझा यह ढिर्ठॄों थर्ट वी करः़ई कोग तो और अतब ऐसे प्रिच्ऑाँ। because this is indentation part के python में indentation part जुरी है कि जो statement निचे आरी है that becomes part of this if statement. Moving on क्या हम पास्टा फर्मेद को पर सकते है using python it is very very straight forward. Suppose अगर यहाँ पर में एक जमपल दूं के हमारे पास्टा की फाँल है which is basically shown यो हमें ये बताना चाहारी है कोँन सी उसके पाट्ट से असमें के यहां तुब लगास है तो ये जो में यहाँ प्सीमपल यहां बहुते है Which is basically this one. अगर यहाँ पर मैं यह सीजे एब वाँ पने वाँ कर पास्टा पर्मेद which can be downloaded from internet also. तो वो क्या करेगा हैंगा यिस फाutos को ज़ब करेंगे तो बोस्वगा रहँ नहीं ज़ाएगा सेम्हिलएल्य पीर लेग, सीगी ये नता सीगी थाबल्व ambiente वोबडबल्फी। it will show this result and if i write cg1148 it will show this result so simple if we write the name of the sequence or file on the editor of python then it will show the contents of that sequence here it is necessary to tell that I didn't take the whole sequence it is simple that I took some of the characters to show it printing all sequences name in a faster database now in the last slide that I had read the format I had saved them in the name of fry3utr.txt file which I am saying here ok now I want to show here that what we have python in that how we have looping for example I have used for operator which tells us that we want to read multiple lines so what we do for line in open fly3utr.txt this is the file in which all the sequences are coming now what it will do is it will read every line if line.start with this symbol if the line starts with this symbol then print it now in our last slide we had three names which were starting with this symbol they were the names of these files cg11604 and so on so now we have put this slide here so that if we want to write some looping statement which means loop statement which we use in programming languages for example making tables for sequential information so these are the for loops finding all sequences length now if we want that whatever sequences we have what is the length of them what is the length of the sequences which are shown basically in this part that we have read the file and what will be the length of the sequences which is basically this output 58, 83 and 69 what we have to code so same for line in open this is the sequence address we have done the text file here line.line.rstrip rstrip means to strip from right side if line starts with this symbol then what we do is simple if name and length and if the name and length are same then print name and length name means cg11604 and length 58 characters similarly we will do this for everyone and we will return it every time and we are getting this print so that finally we have print all the files with their length