Hi everyone, I'm Joe for jazby's casewrakes.com. Happy Saturday. Yesterday, that dropped. 2020 Panini Chronicles Baseball. We did a few of those, some of those. Just some random team breaks yesterday too. And now we've got another Picker team coming at you on Saturday the 26th. From a fresh case, Picker team three. Big thanks to all of these lovely people here for getting into the action. Thank you. If you see a little rooftop next to your name, that means you won that in a blaster break. That video is already uploaded. It should be right next to the break video for this. Chris Walker, last spot mojo star next to his name. A little extra extra magic could happen. So the person who gets the last team and finishes off a break. All card ship by the way. So the first half of this case will be break three and then the second half will be break four, which is in the store right now. No filler break yet. I don't think. But if you want to sell that out straight up, we definitely can. Or if you want to wait for the filler, there will be one. This is empty out kind of awkwardly here. How did these end up on their side like this? Okay, so on the left side there's stacks of four and four to make eight. On the other side is eight as well. You can see it on the top camera. Two. I'm going to select a dye. I'm going to select that Vegas dye right there. We'll go one, two, three for the left side and four, five, six for the right side. And it's four. One, two, three, four, five, six. So this is the side we'll be doing right up here. This we will say for pick your team five. Check that pick your team four. So I'm going to write PYT four. I don't want to mix them up with any of the random team breaks that we have. Fire department's getting ready. So we're going to pull some fire here. Just have them on standby. Good luck. Now remember all card ship. I know there's a lot of variations and different designs and all that sort of stuff. We'll try to, we'll definitely definitely sleeve and top load the the Luis Roberts more immediately. But I think all the numbered cards I'm just going to set aside and our team will have them sleeve and top loaded before they head out just in the interest of time just so we try to get to some more breaks tonight. Save a little bit of time on that. All right, there's some Aquino right here and some Aquino right here. Aristides Aquino, 39 out of 99 for Arthur and the Reds. There you go Arthur. He joined the filler break, got randomized the Reds in pick your team three and gets a rookie Otto. That nice origins design of Aristides Aquino. I think is is playing is did get called up back up again a couple weeks ago a few weeks ago maybe and man he's supposed to be future star for the for the Reds. Spectra cards are really nice too. There you go. Yeah, there you go. Great day already Arthur, exactly. We'll sleeve up that Gavin Lux as well as Alex Bregman and we got a Crusade. Peter Londo to 75. That's for Patrick and the Mets also won that in a team random out of 50. Rafael Devers kind of hard to see the dark blue against the brown there and then we've got a Lorenzo Kane 45 out of 49. Nice one for the Brewers that will be for Craig McGinnis. Nice Boba Shet. We'll take care of that. Glad Guerrero, Mendic and Keston here a five out of 25. Nice nice relic there for the Brew Crew. That's gonna be for Craig McGinnis. Got randomized the Brewers in the team random. I know why don't they make Spectra baseball. Stop teasing us Panini. I want it. The people want it. They really got it. They really got to get that taken care of. There's Josh Rojas to 199. Jersey and autograph for Arthur. Arthur Peru bought his diamond back straight up against the Jersey Auto Josh Rojas on card. Yeah, make Spectra. Look at this. 134 out of 199. Arthur, do we like Josh Rojas? Is he good? There's Michael Lorenzen. Red ink autograph. 92 out of 99. Guess what? For Arthur. This is a personal box for Arthur. What's going on here? There you go. I think he got like three quarters of the hits in this. Tony Gontlin, rookie Silver and Fernando Tetease Jr. to 299. That's right. We've turned that we've turned that frown upside down. Oh, now we want the one of one. Wow, that's it. TJ, you know what? You're right. Honestly, I didn't even spot that. Look at this. TJ saying he doesn't think that's not Tony Gontlin. Unless it's like an old photo of him. Does he even have a beard like that? He more has a mustache, right? Maybe it is him. No, maybe it is him. I don't know. I think of Gontlin more like I'm going to switch screens just a second here. I think of Gontlin more like that. But there's a picture of Gontlin that looks like that. But he's mostly like that, although he's got that going on there, too. In my head, he's more that. It doesn't look like him, though. There's Bryce Harper. No, but at first glance, it does not look... I still don't think it looks like him. Oh, you can't kit? That's a shame. Can you put like some of them together? We have Chris Bryant, Spectra, and our first Luis Robert. Rookie card. That'll go to the White Sox. That'll be for Richard. We've got Dal Lugo. Playbook autograph for the Stroze. That'll be for Jared. Okay, that's nice, Kib. So you got the Gordon, the Melvin Gordon. Score at least two touchdowns. Dwayne Haskins' first touchdown. Justin Herbert. Touchdown, first touchdown. All right. Okay. I love that parlay, Kib. One of these days, well, it's going to hit. Five to win 25, it's almost $26,000. I'm rooting for you, Kib. I want that to happen. There's maybe Tony Gonsolin again. That goes to Robert and the Dodgers to 49. Got the Dodgers in that team random. Bo Bechet, Luis Robert, Nico Horner. Put in the other pile so they get sleeved and top-loaded. Luis Robert will sort out right now. Another one for Richard. We've got timeless treasures, Luis Robert. Bryce thinks that could be what, a Tony Gonsolin twin maybe? Yeah, it's possible. Maybe one Tony Gonsolin just has a mustache and the other Tony Gonsolin has a beard. That's how you tell those twins apart. There's Luis Robert again. That's the only way you tell them apart. And there's a silver ink autograph. That's pretty cool. Sean Murphy, three out of 15 for the A's. Wit with the A's. Got the A's straight up.  Like mustache Tony Gonsolin is like the good guy, loves cats and pitches for the Dodgers. And then whenever he has a bad start, it's probably his evil twin. There's nine out of 10, Christian Jelic. And we've got a Corey Seeger relic back there. Spectra design also for Robert Runkle. That's to 99. TJ, we've got to find TJ some rangers here. Another boba shut. And Nico Horner red wave to 199. All of those cubbies will go to Debro. I randomized the cubs. I feel like there are some, look at what the playoff situation is here. The Cardinals and Giants can each, according to MLB.com, Cardinals and Giants can each clinch a postseason spot by either winning two or two more games or any combination of a victory and a loss by the Phillies and Brewers. Wow. What are the tie breakers? Tie breakers are different in 2020. For rules on this, read a completely different page. I'm not going to do that. Read the key tie breaker sections below. Oh man, there's so many scenarios. All right, never mind. I was going to read all this, but we're not. I think as it stands now, the Rays would play the Blue Jays, White Sox would play the A's, Astros would play the twins, Yankees would play the Indians. In the NL, the Giants would play the Dodgers, eight versus one seed, and then Reds, Braves, Marlins, Cubs, Cardinals, Padres. That's what we're looking at. In the Best of Three Wild Card series, which is kind of a wild way to do things. Now, I'm not sure if I like that for the future, but I think it's interesting now. There's a Rookies and Stars, Luis Robert right there on top for the White Sox, and all the NL games are in Texas. They're either in Arlington or in Houston. And all the AL games, we've got a set of games here in LA actually, and then in San Diego as well. And then the World Series, the ALCS will be in San Diego, NLCS in Texas and Dallas, Arlington. And then the World Series will also be in Arlington. And there are, speaking of the Giants, there's Rico Garcia. They've got a shot, I think, at the eighth seed to play the Dodgers. That'd be pretty spicy to start off the playoff, a little division rivalry here. That's to 199. Giants, David Rodriguez has the Giants. Got a Logan Allen autographed, Timeless Treasures Auto for the Tribe, Cleveland. That goes to Anthony and the Indians. Number to 96, right there, 81 out of 96. There's Luis Robert right there. And there's a Freddie Freeman green to 50. And that Phoenix design, that'll be for the Braves, Robert. Freddie Freeman, I think Freddie Freeman has MVP possibilities. He's been playing really well. There's an autograph for the Pirates, Cole Tucker. That'll be for Chris Parent and the Buccos. Nice numbered, 157 out of 199. Nice Justin Dunn, white parallel, white prison, white Mosaic to one out of 25. Mariners, that'll be for Richard. Longoria, Luis Robert in that Obsidian design, that looks pretty cool. That'll be for Richard F. And the White Sox, got the White Sox straight up. All these Roberts do add up. I'm sure some more than others, but they're pretty cool. Abraham Toro to 100. Anthony Rendon to 49. These greens are not numbered, by the way, in case you're wondering. Gavin Lux in that limited design for the Dodgers. Juan Soto, Spectra Jersey. Yeah, that Obsidian is really cool. They got to make Obsidian Baseball too. Juan Soto, really going to Patrick, got randomized the Nats. All right, next one. Thought I had like a, thought I saw MLB had like a nice little bracket and we can look at, but maybe I don't see it right now. I don't know. Well, MLB postseason is about to start folks, and that is always, is always exciting. So I think, oh, there's the bracket, I see it now. I think the AL is already set. I think there may be some seeding things that might be in play between a couple teams, and that I'm not too sure about. Maybe the A's and twins could flip seeds if depending on who wins or loses. Maybe Cleveland could advance Yankees possibly. I think everything else seems to be, seems to be spoken for. But yeah, but there's, I think the Giants aren't locked in yet. I think Phillies and the Brewers still have a chance to edge into the playoffs. So that'll be pretty interesting. Playoffs going to be starting soon. And there's Playoff Baseball. Pretty exciting. There's Yonathan Gaza. It's a nice looking patch. Four colors in there, and a nice on-card autograph for the Rockies. That'll be for Richard A. with that one. 38 out of 99. Looks great. We got Derek Fisher to 50 for the Astros. Jared got randomized the Stroes. That is numbered bottom right corner right there. 9 out of 50. There's Freddie Freeman, 6 out of 10. Nice low number on that Freddie Freeman. Timeless Treasures, Robert Runkle, and Eson Diaz, Jersey and Autograph. Marlins are in, folks. They're actually the, currently they're the sixth seed. Lost over 100 games last year, just a bit over 500 this year, and they're in, they're in the playoffs. 87 out of 99. Miami, Robert Primrose with the fish. I mean in this weird COVID year, what if they win it all? That'd be, that'd be crazy. All right, nice Luis Robert. Once again for Richard F. and the White Sox. Got a nice Silver Gavin Lux right here too for the Dodgers, Robert Runkle, Boba Shett, more Luis Robert, Aaron Nola, and that Spectra design, which I really love.  Are the Yankees getting healthy just in time for the playoffs? Anyone who wants to see a healthy Yankees team in the playoffs, they're dangerous. More Gavin Lux, another, this is a nice Luis Robert, a Mosaic base, Luis Robert. They gotta, they gotta do Mosaic baseball too. Mosaic baseball would be hot. And there's Glaber Day right here. Glaber Torres to 2.99. All right, halfway through this half-case break, let's pick a team three. Here comes the next half. PS, the Indians hold the tiebreaker over the White Sox by virtue of head-to-head record. Dodgers have clinched home field advantage through the World Series. All right, so as it stands now, Tampa Bay Blue Jays. Who does everyone have there? This is in San Diego. Let me say, let me say Tampa Bay. They're just too good. Yankees Indians. Healthy Yankees team. They got an advance over the tribe. Astros Twins. I think the Twins could definitely do it. Then White Sox A's. Luis Robert gets hot again. A's could be a really scary team. Or White Sox could be a scary team. I think A's will ultimately advance. Let's open a couple at a time. Dodgers Giants. Obviously Dodgers. I'm a homer. I don't think the Giants have a chance. Cardinals Padres. I got to go Padres. Padres and Dodgers would then meet each other. That would be a great NLDS. Marlins Cubs. I think that might be closer than Cubs fans would want it to be. I think Cubs have to advance. Darvish is pitching too well. And then Reds Braves. It's got to be Braves. Although Sunny Gray's been back on track after a little stint on the IL. So if they're pitching clicks. Sky High says Padres will beat the Cardinals. He's a Cardinals fan, but not a fan of him this year. Carlos Martinez on the IL. That's a plus because he can't stand him. Speaking of the Padres, there's Ronald Bolanos. 40 out of 99 for the Friars. That's going to be for John McCall. Yeah. If the Dodgers get past the Giants and if the Padres get past the Cardinals, that's an NLDS series between the Dodgers and the Padres. And they've had some really fun battles in the regular season this year. So I think that would be some must-see TV. I think all those games are on FS1. We got Jeff McNeil. Jeff McNeil for the Metropolitan. Patrick with the Mets. That extra round is going to be interesting. I feel like MLB playoffs are already difficult enough to navigate. But now there's another extra round. Right, Bryce? TBS has the AL and FS1. Fox has the NL. Then Fox has the World Series. Jordan Yamamoto, 91 out of 99. Miami Marlins. That'll be for Robert. Robert Primrose. Mick Senzel for the Reds. George Springer to 99 for the Astros. Gavin Lux for the Dodgers. Al Zalay Lux again. And Ronald Acuna Jr. Relic for Robert Runkle and the Braves. Not numbered, but a good-looking card there. And then we've got a Justin Dunn, Mosaic Blue to 99. And a Jesus Lazaro to 199 for the A's. Witt with the A's. Boba Shed. And there's Joe Adele. Jersey and Autograph. Prospects Jersey and Auto for the Halos. That's Richard F. with the Angels. Angels had a slim, slim chance. They needed the Rangers to sweep the Astros and the Angels needed to sweep the Dodgers. Rangers did their part. Angels were leading for a little bit and then blew it. They're bullpen. They got to work on that bullpen. There's Boba Shed. Walker Bueller looked healthy in his first start after coming off the IL. Zach Collins. Seven out of eight. I knew that looked a little different. Nice low number there for the White Sox. Richard F. Just a few off the train whistle. And a nice to Tease Jr. to 99. I love that cracked ice contenders design. Nerd on Alvarez. Louise Robert. Scorecard. Corey Seeger. Prism. Hyper maybe. Spectra. Neon Pink Hyper. Too many names. Can't keep track of all the different names. Louise Robert. Richard F. Gavin Lux Green. Evan Longoria to 99.  Longo. Going to David Rodriguez and the Giants. At the moment I think we're facing the old Dodgers. Gavin Lux. And then we have another heavy card stock card back here. It's Logan Allen. Three color patch and autograph. Love that Spectra design. Another one for the Indians. Anthony with the tribe. 27 out of 49. We've got a Daniel Ponce de Lyon for the Cardinals. That's going to go to Mark L. Who got the Cardinals in the randomizer. Not numbered. Then we've got a Dylan Cease right here. 20 out of 99 for the White Sox. There he is again. Number to 2.99 this time. All right. Two more boxes to go. Well, what is everyone seeing in the World Series? Now if you go chalk, I suppose you would think it would be, I don't know, if there's a healthy Yankees team. Yankees Dodgers maybe. Raise Dodgers. Something like that. But what would a crazy World Series matchup be in this crazy COVID times? Is there a crazy World Series matchup that could happen? Could it be like White Sox? Yeah, White Sox Marlins? That would be a wild one. White Sox Padres could be interesting. Yeah, what about, yeah, Luis Robert versus Tetees Jr., White Sox Padres? Listen, if my Dodgers aren't going to be in there, I'd want to see a fun matchup. You know, I don't want to see like, I don't want to see Cleveland Miami is probably not the World Series I want to see. But White Sox Padres, yeah, Skye is saying that, Zach is saying, I could get, that could get some good ratings. What else? What would, what would, what would some other fun matchups be? I wouldn't mind seeing like the Blue Jays. Blue Jays World Series, Blue Jays Braves, right? Boba Shed, Vlad Guerrero Jr. versus Acunia, Ozzy Albie, so on and so forth. Yeah. Well, Jeremy, I think, I think Luis Robert, couple of other guys just need to, just need to get a little hot. And I think, I think they could be a scary playoff team. That's it. That team could turn it around really quickly. Oh, the pitching's failing them too? I thought Luis Robert was struggling a little bit too, but mostly the pitching, huh? Yeah, maybe get those losses out of the way before the playoff start. You don't want to go into playoffs too hot. The Starling Marte, Relic for Arthur and the Diamondbacks. What would a matchup, Skye High is saying, I want to see a matchup that Baseball Pierce would hate? Well, what matchup would that be? 49 out of 99. Probably be any team with young, loud players. To 199, Acus Lizardo, Juan Soto to 25. And Logan Webb, 14 out of 99, Giants. That will be for David and the Giants. And we've got a Brad Keller, 5 out of 50 for the Royals. Kansas City going out to Anthony, picked up the Royals straight up. Actually, that would be White Sox Padres, right? Wouldn't that be the World Series that Pierce would just hate? I could just imagine some, some old like grandpa watching those like two teams and be like, hey, that's not how Baseball's supposed to be played. More Luis Robert. Limited Gavin Lux, Ruggies and Stars Luis Robert. Another Gavin Lux. It's an autograph, Jersey and Otto. Gavin Lux. Nice. Robert Runkel got the Dodgers in that blaster box, that randomizer. I wonder if Gavin Lux would have started this season out of 199. If he would have been in the running for a rookie of the year, Joey Gallo for the Rangers, Spectra Base Card. Got to make that Spectra. Zach Collins, Aaron Nola, Phillies, Boba Chet Green, Sean Murphy, Aracise Zekino. And another box, the final box coming up out of 50. We got Donnie Walton and we've got for Patrick, Trespirera for the Nats. Nice three-color patch and on-card autograph. Patrick Sue with the Nationals. Six out of 49. Nice low number there. Luis Robert season ticket. Luis Robert, that classics design. Stephen Strasburg flipped around because that's his autograph. Nice. There you go, Patrick. Six out of 10. Strasburg Otto, Ruggies and Stars autograph. He never really got this season going, but we'll have plenty of rest this year. And I'll do a quick little recap at the end, ladies and gentlemen. There's no randomizers for me to do right now. Nothing like that. We're good. See, I'll do a quick recap after the final card down here. Yeah, TJ, where are those Rangers? He's looking for Rangers. There's some base card and some other parallels here and there, but nothing huge just yet. Green, Scope, Brewstar, Greaterall, Twins edition. Nice patch. Twins, Richard A. Got the Twins. Seven out of 25. Nice low number on that. Very hard thrower. Good addition to the Dodgers bullpen. Thanks, Minnesota. I think there could be apparently a delight in the clubhouse. He's always got a smile on his face and just willing to do anything. He's like, if they want me to start, I'll start. If they want me to relieve, I'll relieve. Middle relief, I'll do that. Close games, I'll do it. So it seems like a good, good dude, a good addition to the bullpen. Big reason why the Dodgers bullpen has been a lot better this year. Six out of 99. Matt Chapman for the A's. That'll be for Witt. Ronald Acunha Jr. to Tisse Jr. to 299. It's a cool looking card. Clevenger, Jordon, JD Martinez. Spectra. We've got Domingo Leyba, Mosaic, Mike Trout, Phoenix. We have one more thing here. Maybe this one got one more thing here. Gavin Lux, Luis Robert and Eloy Jimenez. Piece of the White Sock pinstripe in there for Richard F. And another Eloy Jimenez, or I'm sorry, another Luis Robert card for you too. Slightly bluish pinstripe, I think one of their alternate uniforms. All right, so there's, we've got a legacy, Gavin Lux. Status, Gavin Lux. There's Barrera again. And we're closing out with a Phoenix, Fernando Tattis Jr. for the Padres. Excellent break, ladies and gentlemen. Thanks everyone for getting in. That was Picker Team 3. Picker Team 4. Let me take a look at Picker Team 4. Is there a filler for Picker Team 4 yet? There is. So now Picker Team 4 is all sold out. We pulled out all the teams in Picker Team 4. They're in a blaster box. So you can win some teams. Looks like it's going to be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 of the 30 spots are getting a team to that blaster box. Then we can do the second half of that case. Jaspeyscasebrakes.com. All right, let's take from the last box to the first box. Pretty nice break overall. Some great designs. A lot of Luis Robert. That Strasburg autograph was cool. Cool Gavin Luxe jersey and autograph. The origins design. Really love that origins look as well. Logan Allen. Plenty of Luis Roberts. All of those add up. Nice Joe Adele. Some pretty excellent stuff. Nice Relics. Another great patch right here too for the Rockies at Luis Robert. It's also pretty neat. Cole Tucker. Tony Gonsolin. May or may not be Tony Gonsolin. Red ink auto for Michael Lorenzen. And then we started off with a nice autograph too, that Aristides Aquino origins edition. And there you go. That was Picker team number three. I'm Joe for Jaspeyscasebrakes.com. I'll see you next time for break number four. Bye-bye.


Hey everyone, welcome and thanks for joining our talk about EBPF and Cilium at Sky for some context. First of all, who is Sky? So Sky started out as a satellite broadcast company with headquarters in the UK in London and has expanded into a much larger multinational company with presences in many other countries. Likewise, Sky has expanded into many other areas beyond satellite broadcast and one of those areas is OTT over the top, which is online video streaming and OTT is a part of Sky, which we are part of. There's going to be two of us who are involved in the presentation today. I'll quickly introduce ourselves and then get on with the content because 20 minutes goes by quite quickly. So first of all, I'm Sebastian Duff or Seb. I've been with Sky for just over six years, originally as a software engineer before moving into delivery. And I'm now responsible for the co-engineering department, which will cover a bit more in the introduction. And with me during the presentation is Antony Contois, who is a principal engineer in co-engineering at Sky. Antony has a strong background in both SRE and software engineering and joined Sky in 2016. I'd also like to mention CECG, who are a consultancy who have played an important role in the journey to build a mature platform as a service offering and in our work with Cilium and EBPF. Joseph Sanyal from CECG was originally going to be part of the presentation with us, but due to timing, he was only able to be involved with the preparation and not actually part of the presentation. So this talk might be a bit different than the others. Rather than going into the deep technicals of how we're leveraging EBPF, we'll be focusing on the delivery aspect and how we leverage technology to gain a high level of confidence, mitigating risk to the platform and to the business. In the first section of the presentation, I'll give a brief overview of what we as co-engineering do. And then I'll hand over to Antony to first talk about why we chose Cilium and EBPF and then about the pipelining as a form of risk mitigation. So co-engineering is a department within the global video engineering and apps division. And it is responsible for global video engineering and apps is responsible for client libraries and back in services and a portion of the clients as well, which is supporting the video and play out for Sky's OTT proposition. Some of the most recognizable platforms and propositions which we are part of at Sky, SkyGo, Now, which was formerly now TV, Peacock and soon to be SkyShowtime. In co-engineering, we build a multi-tenanted Kubernetes based platform as a service offering, which hosts about 90% of the application workload. The platform is built as a white label product so that it can be built once and deployed many times to support the different organizations and propositions. As the underlying platform for the high-profile high-profile propositions, we have very large and complex requirements, including being highly available, hybrid cloud, multi-region and active active and all of these at high-scale and low latency. So to be able to operate efficiently at scale, we have a number of important engineering principles which we follow for everything we do. And I won't go into all of them in this presentation, but I will mention two of the golden rules which we follow as they have a very large impact on the way we do things and the way how things have been designed. So the two golden rules are Tenant A cannot negatively impact Tenant B and no tenant can negatively affect the platform. Another of the key principles which we follow is that we treat any tenant and environment as production. So that means, for example, we treat the development cluster which teams use as our first production environment. And although they're not any Sky customers who are using that environment because there are 90-plus development teams, depending on the environment, any disruption can have a huge impact to their ability to deliver and to the business as well. And although we are a platforming team, we measure our success by the success of the tenants who are the teams using the platform. So our view is that one might have the best, most perfect platform in the world, but if people are struggling to adopt it, then it really isn't a successful platform. And that really comes through in how we actually implement a lot of the capabilities which we have. And on the slide, we have some interesting stats which give a brief view of the scale which we're working at. So the multi-tenanted platform currently supports just over 13 departments with over 90 teams, which is about 1,000 engineers using the platform. These teams are using a wide variety of different technologies. So our goal is to provide a consistent interface for everyone, and we largely achieve this through Kubernetes. But we also build custom tooling and libraries for teams to leverage as well. And on this slide, we have a bit of a snapshot of some of the interesting technical stats. We have over 300 unique applications deployed to the platform with more than 60,000 replicas running across all environments. And to support the required scale, we have performance tested our central services, such as Ingress, to 1 million TPS. And that's enough from me with an introduction to the platform. I'll hand over to Anthony to talk about why we show Cillium and EBPF. Hi, everyone. So I'm going to talk about why we've been choosing Cillium at Sky and how we've been mitigating the risk with the help of CECG Co-Engineering Consulting Group. So first of all, at Sky, we've seen there is a lot of application running on top of the platform and on top of Kubernetes with multi-tenanted architecture. So and by default on Kubernetes, you've got a flat network where every single port can talk between each other. So we want to restrict with the help of Kubernetes network policies and Cillium network policies, restrict network communication within the cluster. So from port to port, we want to also allow and block access to external endpoints, for example, a databases to our tenants. So a specific tenant are going to be able to talk to a specific databases and so on. We also want to block malicious IP defined by the security team. And that's going to be defined at the cluster level. And we want to make sure like the tenant cannot override it. And we want to move towards the least privileged access models where every single tenant are going to define the full network flow. Due to the high scale and requirement from Sky, we've got like some scalability concern using IP tables. So we've been deciding to leverage and embrace Cillium and EBPF. So Cillium is going to essentially inject some EBPF program inside the kernel to interact with the network stack. And is Kubernetes aware of the full topology and IPs, which is going to be able to inject inside the BPF map and share the data between the EBPF program and the Kubernetes context. That's going to allow us to have a more efficient load balancing and network policies propagation. And we heavily rely on the deny functionality of Cillium to block at the cluster level every single IPs, which seems to be malicious and also using host network policies. And with the low overhead of EBPF, we have the nice observability feature like using Hubbell and Cillium monitor. So in order to embrace this kind of new technologies, we want to make sure there is, we want to mitigate the risk before going to production. So we're going to show how we've been like mitigating the risk by automating the test. So you've got to get repository. You're going to push and then you're going to have a build, which is going to be deployed. So you commit and the build is going to be started on our CI agent. And we're going to run all the localized tests. So for example, linting, digos, vulnerability scanning, and when everything has been passed, we can obviously the Docker image has been built and published to the test repository. So when everything has been passed, as I said, the test image is going to be available and then it's going to be pulled and reused by all our tests, like non-functional testing and functional testing. And if those one pass is going to be promoted up to the next repository, which is excited test. So as part of those tests, I've got two main tests, the functional testing, which we are heavily relying on the Cillium connectivity test suite, which is provided by Cillium. And it's essentially a bunch of pod, which are deeper in the cluster and doing some DNS HTTP check connectivity check and also making sure the Cillium network policies and Kubernetes network policies are the behavior is expected and working on the running cluster. And we've been adding some additional functional testing, including like, for example, making sure namespace network policies cannot override the cluster while deny policies. We want to make sure like the Cillium identities are limited to some specific label. So to limit the number of identities inside the cluster. So for us, we only limit on the namespace labels. That's been every single namespace are going to have a one-to-one mapping with the Cillium identities. And we want to make sure, for example, when we apply a network policies, the existing TCP connection are going to be blocked. So that's one of the main tests, making sure we've got functional requirement and testing. And then we've got the non-functional testing, which is we're trying to have like a 30-minute fast feedback loop. And what we want to exercise is the full network and making sure everything can work because Cillium is using or interacting with the network stack. So essentially, exercising the full network path is having a some load injector, sending some load through a backend. And then we've got like multiple communication happening. So from pod to pod, from using the service IP, but also cost cluster communication, using the internal and external ingresses. And obviously, we are relying on a Kubernetes hostname to target this service. So we are exercising the DNS and UDP flow by resolving the Kubernetes hostname through service IP and core DNS. And talking to the backend, we're using HTTP and JRPC and the TCP, exercising the TCP stack. Which is what the tenant are using on our platform. During this time, when the full load run, we are including some resilience and chaos testing, which means essentially like deleting a Cillium agent pod, a Cillium operator, one of the Cillium ETCD member, and also the backend. And it's really important to delete the backend which is receiving the load, to exercise a rolling deployment and or deleting a pod, the business as usual on the platform. And that's going to force the load injector to reestablish connection and recycle connection. So we are trying to target like the worst case scenario. And we have like showing some number, like the number of identities we want to have at the maximum on a cluster and then trying to reproduce it on our test environment. We have also some dedicated tests, which is to simulate a migration from Cillium 1.7. So for example, we deploy 1.7 on an existing cluster. We run the load and while the load is running and the chaos testing happening, we deploy the new version, which was Cillium 1.9 to make sure there is no disruption. Obviously it's very hard to have every single use case and test. So that's why we automate all the tests, making sure we can scale and every time we've got an issue reported, then we make sure we have regression testing to make sure the issue is not going to happen again. So as part of the non-functional testing, we've got four different tests. The first one is we are simulating the identity chart. So it's essentially creating and deleting some pod, which can have a produce some identity chart and see the identity I injected inside the BPF policy map. So we simulate or create 5,000 identities and we've noticed a small age case. So during all those four tests, obviously you've got the chaos testing happening and you've got some Cillium agent, Cillium operator and also Cillium EDCD member and the backend restarted. And we've noticed a very small age case scenario with Cillium agent restart where when you restart it, you've got a small increase in term of drop as part of the matrix, but it's not affecting the client due to the TCP we try. And we've been like walking closely with Cillium and Isabel on team to measure it upstream, to measure fixed upstream. And then you've got the second test, which is exactly the same, but without Cillium agent restart and we tolerate your drop. And the first test is, the second test might go away and we're just gonna have the first one, but to tolerate your drop when we're gonna release a new version. The third test is simulating like the CMM network policies we creation, which is, so it's gonna exercise like flushing the BBF map and all the information inside when you delete the CMM network policies, but and when you create it, it's just gonna add all the data inside the BBF policy map. And we use the cluster entities, which is gathering all the identities and allowing all the identities inside the cluster to talk to this target. And we do that with the identity chance and the fourth one is without identity chance to isolate which scenario is impacting. To give you a bit more insight, so for example, we are heavily relying on metrics when the load is running and we have been creating some alert and we gate the test and we fail the test if there is any alert generated. So as you can see on the left, you got the pod creation. So we are trying to create pod to generate identities related to and at peak you've got like 10 pod created per second, which and you can see the pod count, which is like roughly around like 1500 and which is matching the identity delta, even delta, which is a number of identities and we delete some of them. So you got the identity chance so you can see it, it can go up and down. You've got the BPF map operation, which is showing all the operations are happening on the BPF. The cilium drop and also you can see the four tests with the load ejector with 2,000 kTPS and we monitor the load injection latency, making sure there is no increase and the CPU and memory give us the ability to define properly at the worst case scenario on the demon set. So when both tests has passed, we're going to promote this artifact, so the Docker image to the extended test repository. At every single day at 6 p.m., we are running what we call extended NFT or non-functional testing, which is essentially the non-functional test which has been running for 30 minutes. But for this time, it's going to be a longer period of time and for maximum 16 hours, but in our use case for cilium engine, it's going to run for eight hours, which gives us a good amount of time to show any memory leak or any issue happening at game. When everything has been passed, it's going to be promoted to different organizations. So it's going to be one for NBCU, one for Sky and they're going to be deployed on different clusters. That's why we've got different organizations and we deploy to what we could predict, which is one of the specific environment. So at Sky, we've got multiple environments. You've got pre-dev, dev, and stage and prod. So they are all done and facing, which means the dev team are deploying an application on top of it, except pre-dev, where pre-dev is only the infrastructure people who are deploying some application and exercising the network, making sure there is no issue. So we've been building for all those three, for environment, building what we call continuous load, which is essentially some load injection running 24-7 on the cluster and targeting a back-end. And obviously, you've got the chaos testing happening at the same time on those back-end. And it's going to exercise the full network flow, internal, external ingress, and Kubernetes services. Obviously, we're going to gather all the metrics and define some alerts. So, for example, latency increase, HTPRO, packet drop, and that's how we can get promotion from one environment to the other one through the alert. At 8.30, we've got the promotion mechanism, which is going to be promoted to one pre-dev, to dev, and so on, if there is no alert defined. And at 10 a.m., for example, because we've got multiple regions, we can stagger the deployment across multiple clusters. So at 10 a.m., we've got the first region and then the second one at 12 for the same environment. And then if anything happening on the first one, then we can stop, obviously, the deployment on the second one. Thank you. It was a brief overview on how we've been leveraging Celium and eBPF at scale. And thanks for all the CECG and co-engineering consulting group for the help. We are hiring at Sky and also CECG. So if you have any question, please let us know.


Suppose you have a bulb which requires a 100V to power up, and let's say somewhere far away from your city there's a power station which generates exactly that 100V, then we might think let's just connect them with cables and we'll get what we want, right? But that's not what we do in real life. Instead, at the power station we use a transformer and step up that voltage, let's say by 10 times to make it a 1000V, and then near our house we use another transformer to step that voltage back down to whatever we need. How does this make any sense? Why do we do that? Well, transmission line wires which are so many kilometers long have considerable resistances which you cannot neglect, and you might know that current flowing through a resistance heats up causing power loss. Wait a second, how does using transformers help in reducing the power loss? That's exactly what we'll explore in this video. I want to actually show you what happens to the currents when the voltage gets stepped up or stepped down, and once we get that we'll come back over here towards the end of the video and answer our question. So since the current everywhere finally depends upon the bulb that we're attaching over here, let's start by analyzing the current in this circuit. Before we look at the currents, a quick recap. What decides the voltages? We've seen in a previous video that the voltage over here and here purely depends upon the number of turns. So in this example, we are assuming the turns over here is 10 times less than the number of turns over here. And as a result, the voltage over here will be 10 times less than the voltage over here. So this is a step down transformer. Now if that is not clear or you need a refresher on that, feel free to go back and check our video on introduction to transformers. Anyways, now let's think about the currents. For example, if you look at this circuit, how much current do you think will flow over here? Well, that completely depends upon the resistance of the bulb, right? I know the voltage, so I need the resistance. To keep things simple, let's say the resistance over here was 100 ohms. Then from Ohm's law, the current would be 100 divided by 100. That's going to be 1 ampere. So there'll be a 1 amp current flowing. It's an alternating current flowing over here. But now the question that I want to ask you is how much current do you think will flow here? That's an interesting question because this is a different circuit altogether. How do we figure that out? Well, we can use one of the basic principles of physics, energy conservation. We can say that look in a transformer, there is energy, electrical energy being transferred from here to here. So whatever energy is lost by the charges in this circuit must be exactly gained by the charges in this circuit. If this is an ideal transformer where there is no energy loss. And that's a big if because in reality, there will always be energy losses. For example, you might recall due to the fluctuating current, there will be a fluctuating magnetic field in that ferromagnet. And turns out the fluctuating magnetic field generates heat in the ferromagnet. We call this the hysteresis loss. I'm not going to talk about hysteresis. What matters is there is heat generated. That's an energy loss. On top of that, this fluctuating magnetic field also generates what we call eddy currents on the surface of the ferromagnet, which further heats up the transformer, more energy loss. And not to mention, we assumed all the flux generated over here links over here, which is not true. Turns out in general, there will be some flux leakage, meaning more energy loss. So you get the point to know transformer is 100% efficient. But let's forget about all of that. Not for your exams, but as of now, forget about all of that. And let's assume that this is a 100% efficient, perfect transformer. Then energy is conserved. My question to you is, can you pause the video and think a little bit about by using energy conservation, electrical energy. Can you figure out how much current would be flowing in this circuit? Pause and give this a try. Okay, hopefully you've tried. Because we are having an energy continuous energy transfer, it might make more sense to talk about energy transferred per second, which is power. And so we can now say, whatever is the power input is exactly equal to the power output. So power input should exactly equal the power output. And how do we calculate electric power? We calculate that as the product of voltage and current. So the input power would be the input voltage. I'm just gonna write Vi, that's our 10,000, sorry, 1,000, multiplied by the input current, which I need to calculate. And that equals the output power. I'm just gonna write as V out, which is our 100, multiplied by the output current. Now instead of substituting, let's do this logically. It's saying that the product of the voltage and the current must be the same on both sides. Now because the voltage here is 10 times more than the voltage over here, this means that the current over here must be 10 times less than the current over here. Only then the product will be the same, right? Therefore, the current over here, don't worry too much about the direction. The current direction will have the same direction, same sense as this circuit, but don't worry about the direction, okay? The current will be 10 times less, so it's gonna be 0.1 ampere. Now I wanna spend a couple of minutes over here because this has confused me a lot. The equation is telling us for transformers that when you step down a voltage, the current increases. And similarly, if you were to step up a voltage, the current would decrease. And I'm like, how does that make any sense? Why is it that if the voltage is higher, the current should be smaller? I mean, from the equation it makes sense, but why? Shouldn't be the other way around? Shouldn't more voltage give me more current, Ohm's law? Well, we need to be careful. Ohm's law works for a circuit, within a circuit. So over here, if the voltage increases, current will increase. Voltage decreases, current will decrease. But here we are comparing voltages and the currents of two different circuits. They can have whatever values they want, so don't compare voltages and currents of two different circuits and think about Ohm's law. Okay, but still, this equation did not make much intuitive logical sense to me and I struggled with this for years, but I think, finally, I have a decent explanation to understand why in a transformer, if you have more voltage, you'll end up with less current. So for this, let's go back to the basics and ask ourselves, what's the meaning of a voltage? Well, remember, voltage basically means joules per coulomb and so 1000 volts basically means 1000 joules per coulomb. What does that mean? That means that if there was a coulomb of charge that moved from here to here, then it would lose 1000 joules of energy to transfer that to the blue circuit. So let's say here is the coulomb of charge and this cloud represents 1000 joules. When it moves down, it would lose that 1000 joules to the blue circuit. Okay, and on the other side, we have 100 volts, potential difference here. What that means is 100, let me write that over here, 100 joules per coulomb and since here we are gaining energy, this means that if a coulomb were to move from here to here, it would gain 100 joules of energy. Again, here's our coulomb and as it's moving, it will gain only 100 joules of energy. And so now the question is, how can this coulomb lose a 1000 joules but this coulomb only gains 100 joules? How can that be? Ah, here's how I like to think about it. This coulomb talks to this coulomb and says, hey, because you're giving me a lot of energy and I can't take all of that in one go, maybe I'll take multiple rounds. Maybe I'll just take 10 rounds and in each round I will take only 100 joules. And that's what it does. And that's why the coulomb over here has to travel 10 times faster than the coulomb over here. Now of course the animation is not perfect. First of all, I'm not showing 10 rounds, I'm only showing five rounds and the current is supposed to be alternating, I'm not showing any of that just to keep things simple. But you get the idea, right? Because we are stepping down voltage, we are forcing this coulomb to accept less energy and as a result it has to go faster and take multiple rounds and that's why stepping down voltage increases the current. And of course something similar is happening near the power station side as well because we are stepping up the voltage. This time it's the coulomb that is receiving the energy that is traveling slower because it is receiving way more energy than the coulomb over here can give. And so stepping up the voltage has to decrease the current. So now we can look at the big picture. Without the transformers, the transmission lines would have had one amperes of current. But with the transformer, by stepping up the voltage by 10 times, we have reduced the current in the power lines by 10 times. And so now if we factor in the resistance of these transmission lines, which is very real, then remember the power dissipated, the amount of heat dissipated per second in the transmission lines is given by I square R. And since the current over here is 10 times smaller than the current over here, the power dissipated over here would be 100 times smaller than the power that would get dissipated over here. Which kind of makes sense because the charges are flowing very slowly over here, less collisions are happening and so you would expect low power dissipation. Now at this point I had one more confusion. Yeah, I used to be a confused kid. See people always say power loss or heat dissipated is I square R, I square R losses. But hey, power can also be written as V square by R. And so if I look at this equation, with more voltage I would get more power loss. So doesn't that mean stepping up the voltage actually increases the power loss? What's going on over here? Can you pause the video one more time to see and see if you can explain this yourself? All right, remember where this comes from. This comes from Ohm's law by substituting V is equal to IR and Ohm's law is always applied across a resistor. So this voltage is not this voltage or this voltage. This is the voltage that would come across the resistor. And that voltage is basically I times R, which means over here since the current is 10 times smaller, even that voltage across this resistor has also reduced by 10 compared to the voltage over here. And so yeah, because there is some voltage drop happening, not all the 1000 volts will appear over here. Some of the voltage drop will appear over here, but that amount is much smaller than what you would get here. A lot of that 100 volt would get appeared over here. Does that make sense? So even voltage wise, if you look at it, power dissipated has reduced. Stepping up voltage helps in efficient power transfer. And now you may ask, well, then why just step it up to a 1000 volt? Why not say 10,000 volt? And you're right. In reality, the transmission lines carry currents at very high voltages, hundreds of thousands, or sometimes you step it up to even millions of volts. And finally, you may be one of those people who might say, why million when we can do a billion? I mean, if you step it up to a billion volts, then the current would be almost negligible. You have almost perfect power transmission, right? Well, yeah, theoretically, yeah, but remember to step up voltage, you'll have to put more windings appropriately. So good luck with that. But even if you do that, well, there are other problems. Now with a billion volt voltage potential difference, we can ionize the air and that will start giving us lightning everywhere. That's not good. So yeah, there are practical limitations to how I can go, but if you keep that in mind, then yeah, higher you go, better would be the power transmission.


Now surprisingly, Lewenhoek's very simple microscope, which allowed much greater magnification, allowed him to see and describe things that happen inside a cell. So he described bacteria that he found from scrapings from his mouth. And one of the things that he found was these little molecules or animalcules swam around in a solution. But if he sampled his mouth after having drunk a hot cup of coffee in the morning, they didn't swim around anymore. So these little animals were killed by his hot coffee. He really liked sampling from the environment around him. So he would take samples of pond water and describe many, many objects that he found swimming around in that water. And he also looked inside algal cells and described a spiral green spring that was contained within the cell, which was a very good description of a chloroplast, which is where photosynthesis takes place inside algal cells. So the advantage of his type of microscope, which allowed much greater magnification, was that he could clearly see inside the cell and started to describe the processes that can occur inside the cell. Hi. In this section we're going to talk about a replica of Lewenhoek's microscope, that Zeiss Company manufactured as a commemoration about 300 years since Lewenhoek actually published his work. Ryan Gunning, when he got hold of this replica of Lewenhoek's microscope, decided to try and see what he could see through it. And he took the Tradescantia stamen hairs and mounted them. So here we have the microscope, and there's a spike that is protruding, and that's what you impale your specimen on. This little lever here allows you to rotate the specimen around relative to the position of the lens. We have a long screw here with a turning handle that raises and lowers the specimen relative to the lens. And finally we have a third adjusting screw here, which moves the specimen towards and away from the lens so that you can get the specimen exactly in focus. So if you look at the microscope from the other side, you can see the little circular bead of glass which is the lens. Now the secret or the reason why Lewenhoek's microscope was so effective was that tiny bead of glass has a much greater magnification property than the larger lenses that Hook used in his illustrations. So the idea is we have our specimen that's mounted on the little hook. Let's have to get that positioned correctly. And then you would hold the microscope up to your eye with a source of light behind the specimen. So the light's coming through the specimen and you're looking at it through the lens. And this is really cool because it's quite tricky to see through, but what you can see is this little bead of blue balls joined end to end, which is the stamen hairs. Now I'm not an expert in using this microscope, so we're going to turn to Brian Gunnam's superb video footage which he took. And this is an experiment that we normally run in our first year biology labs. So we have here a plant which has these beautiful blue flowers and the stamen hairs, which are naturally coloured blue, can be mounted and observed. Normally we use a compound microscope, but Brian Gunnam managed to mount these and view them through Lewenhoek's microscope and take a video. So what's special about these cells is firstly they're filled with a big blue sack, which is the vacuole. And the natural blue dye in it allows you to see much more clearly inside the specimen without having to apply stains. And the tissue is only one cell thick, so you don't have to prepare, you don't have to section. You just mount the single stamen hair to be able to look into a cell. And as you peer inside the cell, you can see little particles, as if they're like cars moving along a highway, streaming along, moving around the cell. And this is called cytoplasmic streaming. Now, second specimen that we also use are giant algal cells. Now these single cells can be as large as several centimetres long. And these make wonderful specimens to also look through the microscope. And here is an example that Brian Gunnam also photographed using Lewenhoek's replica microscope. What you can see are the spiral arrangement of chloroplasts on the surface of the cell. And if we focus deeper into the cell behind the layer of chloroplasts, once again you can see these balls or globules of material being shuttled along through the cell. Again, the cytoplasmic streaming.


Welcome back to this NPTEL course on game theory. In the previous session we have proved the Spray-Grundy theorem and we mentioned that the Spray-Grundy theorem identifies any impartial game with a NIM game. We will see how this happens. So let us look at the certain things. Remember in any NIM game let us say with single heap. So this we denote this by S star of N. This is known as the number. So what we would like to say now is that any game, any impartial game if you take G and we have its Grundy value G of G and look at the corresponding star of GG. So we would like to say somehow these two are equivalent. So how do we do it? So we will discuss about this aspect now in this lecture. So this requires for us to introduce certain facts but before that let me mention here the following thing. So let us look at the NIM game with k-piles of sizes N1, N2, Nk let us say. So this is P position if and only if the NIM sum the individual file sizes is 0. So this is a fact that we have proved even while proving the strategy for NIM games. So if you can either go back and see that video and see this or take it as an exercise and do it. So this is something very important. Basically we would like to look at it. So the most important fact I would like to say is that the NIM game of multiple piles is same as like the sum of the individual games. So that is the spray Grundy theorem. So in fact here now I would like to define if G is one game and let us say H is another game. What do we mean by G is same as H? This is something that we need to define. So what exactly this means? So let us take any other impartial game. Let me denoted by k if G plus k H plus k have same outcome then we say that G is equal to H. So two impartial games G and H we are saying them that they are equivalent or they are equal equivalent if sum with any another impartial game they should have a same outcomes. That means if the G plus k has N position H plus k also will be N position if G plus k is P then H plus k should also be P and they should happen with any other impartial game k and if that happens we say that G and H are equivalent. Now we would like to look at some important points. So take a G is an impartial game then look at G plus G. So what can we say about G plus C? Who is going to win? So this is in fact this idea we have explained earlier. So you are going to play two games who is going to win? Suppose if the game G is going to be 1 by player 1 what about G plus G? Can we say that G plus G is N R P? So interesting fact here is that G plus G is always. So why is this? Basically the idea is that if a player has a optimal strategy has a winning strategy what you are going to do is that you imitate it repeat the same strategy whatever the other player is playing you just simply follow in your game and then you will know that you are going to get to this P position. So this is a very nice symmetry argument and this proves that G plus G will always be P. This is one fact then another fact is that if K is P position then G is going to be equivalent to G plus K. So why is this true? This is true mainly because if you take some of two P positions this will always be a P position. So sum of two P positions is always P position and sum of N and P is. So if G is P K is P so therefore G plus K is again P if J is N and N plus P is again going to be N. So therefore this thing is there but why is that sum of two P positions is always P? So this is an interesting exercise I will say. So one should certainly look this take this as exercise and try doing this one. So this proves that G is always equivalent to G plus K as long as K is P. So what is you take a G and take its gringy value and take the corresponding number what can we say about G plus? So very interesting thing is that its gringy value therefore this is a P position. So G plus the number of GG is always a P position. Therefore G is equivalent to G plus star GG from the previous fact which is same as G plus G plus and now this is equivalent to so we have used multiple facts here. So G plus G is always a P position that we have proved it here and therefore this is P. So therefore this is going to be simply. So therefore any game is equivalent to a NIM game. So this is basically the consequence of the spray-grindy theorem. So therefore every impartial game is equivalent to. So this immediately implies that if we know how to play a NIM game we can always play that any impartial game by using this spray-grindy theorem. So this introduces this tells us why this spray-grindy theorem is a very very important theorem and this is a in fact characterizes every impartial game. Now let us look at one more example in the previous session we have discussed one example. Now let us look at another example. So we keep we consider one pile game with the rule and we can remove any even number of chips it is not the whole pile. So I can remove any number of chips even number of chips but I cannot remove whole that is important or we can remove provided it has odd number of chips. So now we have changed the rules a little we instead of removing any number of chips we are saying that we can remove any number of even number of even chips even number of chips but we cannot remove entirely if the entire pile size is even but at the same time we can remove the entire pile provided it is odd. So now here what are the terminal positions? Obviously if there are only 0 that is a terminal position not only this there is another terminal position which is 2 when there are 2 chips are there I cannot remove anything. So therefore 2 is also a terminal this thing. So therefore the Grundy value let us say x and the corresponding Grundy value so if there is a 0 the Grundy value is going to be 0 if it is 1 the Grundy value is going to be 1 and if it is 2 the Grundy value is going to be 0 and if it is 3 the Grundy value is 2 with 4 it will be 1 5 it will be 3 and you can go on. In fact we can calculate that g of 2k is going to be k minus 1 and g of 2k minus 1 is going to be k for k grad equals to 1 inductively one can calculate that whenever this is an even number given by 2k then this is simply going to be k minus 1 and when it is an odd number it is given by this k where odd number is given by 2k minus 1. So this is going to be the this thing. Suppose now let us look at this game is played 3 piles of sizes 10, 13, 20. Therefore g of 10 is going to be 4, g of 13 is going to be 7, g of 20 is going to be 9. Therefore if I take the Nimsum 4 plus 7 plus 9 this is going to be 1, 0 this is not equals to 0. So recall the definitions of this Nimsum and make sure that this is not 0. Therefore this is a N position. Therefore what is going to be the if you are in an N position what is the winning move you need to make it to 0. Once again recall the NIM game strategy go back there and see it the winning move is always to make it to 0. So therefore you want to make it to 0 therefore sg value the spring degree value this 9 we want to make it to 3. If I make this into 3 then this thing that means we need to remove for this we may remove 12 chips from the pile of 20 leaving 8 and g of 8 is 3 keep that in mind. So why do we want this to be 3 if I put 3 here that Nimsum is going to be 0 and therefore g of 8 I want to make it spring degree value to be 3 to make it 3 what we need to look at it. So therefore g of 8 is going to be 3 so that is exactly this one. So this is a another example of how you can use this spring degree theorem. So far we have seen impartial games with normal play. Now we would like to see a major play game. So recall what is a normal play? In a normal play the player who made the last move is basically the winner here in a major play he is going to be losing. So let us look at a very interesting example which is known as a silver coinage. The silver coinage the name silver is basically the very famous mathematician J.J. Silvester on his this thing we call this as a silver coinage game this game is basically the following thing. Here people the players alternatively of course we only take natural numbers what are the rules? A player cannot pick a number which is sum of previously used numbers. So let me illustrate with an example. So let us say the player 1, player 2 let us say in the first round player 1 has picked 3. Now player 2 he cannot take he cannot pick 3, he cannot pick 3 plus 3 cannot please pick 3 plus 3 plus 3 like this. So he cannot pick from this cannot pick. So let us say he will he can pick 7, 7 is certainly not in this.  In a nutshell he cannot pick m into 3 plus n into 7 if for m, n belongs to m. So he cannot pick any of the number which can be written as a combination of 3 and 7 positive integer combination of 3 and 7. So for example he can pick 5, once he picks 5 the same thing happens 3, 7, 5 and things like that. So there is no way he can pick the other numbers. Now let us say for example the player 2 now can pick 4, once he picks 4 what are all the possibilities that are available to player 1. So lot of numbers let me not mention what are all the things which cannot be done but let us assume in the next round let us say player 1 picks 2. Once he picks 2 the most interesting thing that happens here is that all the numbers now can be written as a combination of 2, 3, 5, 7, 4. So the only possibility that will be left for player 2 will be only 1 no other and once he picks a 1 there are no more moves. Therefore whoever picks 1 because any number is a multiple of 1 so therefore after that no chance. So now what would you look like to consider here? Should we consider a normal play or measure play? So let us look at if 1 is a choice for a player so he naturally will pick at the very first move therefore the game makes no sense. So therefore the normal play here makes no sense. So therefore picking 1 is not legal move here this is the main rule. If a player picks 1 that means he is ruling out every other possibility. So therefore picking 1 means he is going to be a loser so you do not want the players to pick.  So there is one is not a legal move in that sense and this. So now this game is very very different from the normal play. In fact in the previous games like champ and other things you can also say them as a measure but the silver coin is actually ensures that the measure play is a natural option. That is main interesting thing here. Now let us look at few interesting points with this game because what is the length of this game? How long can this game go on? For example people can any large number you take it and then if you pick that large number and players can alternate and can reduce one by one and then go on picking the numbers. Therefore the play can take any amount of time any long it can be any long the length can be anything. Therefore this game is not like a previous games but there is an interesting thing which is an interesting result which says that once there are if I pick 3 player 1 picks 3 player 2 picks 7 then what happens is that any number bigger than or equal to 6 that is 12 is not possible. 12 is not possible when already player 1 and player 2 picks 3 and 7. So therefore what is happening is that this is automatically imposing some kind of a finiteness. So this result is a very interesting result in fact it requires a proof which we will discuss in the next session but before concluding this session I would like to ask everyone to try thinking about proving this fact why 13 is not possible. For example that is easy 13 is 2 into 3 6 plus 7 13 14 is 7 into 7 plus 7 so 2 into 7 14 we can actually go on doing this. So how do we prove this and all that becomes the next sessions topic. So the main interesting thing here is that the normal play and major play they are not exactly the opposite and this is one example where the major play is a natural and not under normal play the game stops immediately. So we will continue this in the next session. Thank you. Any number bigger than or equal to 2 into 6 that is 12 is not possible.


Is it ever appropriate to say if you don't like it here then leave in terms of a country? No No, I mean if you don't like it here work to change it I mean, I don't like it here in the way. It is right. I want to make it better. So should I leave? No, I don't think leaving is The solution if somebody has bad ideas and argue against the ideas but to tell them To leave that's not what America's about what America's about. I mean some of them will leave, right? I Remember Boba Streisand. You said if George Bush wins another election. I'm moving to Canada. I'm leaving Well, of course, she never left and you could say yeah, go ahead and leave right if that's what you're threatening to do go do it But to say that that that they the the solution Is to leave I mean if somebody says Cuba's a wonderful place that it's completely legitimate to say why don't you move that? You should go to Cuba experience it but not in a sense of leaving America in a sense of go experience what you're saying is good If somebody says I think what's going on in America is Bad and I'm gonna work to change it then great That's what America's about and if they have bad ideas then your job is to convince them they're wrong or to fight against it But imagine who who are the who is going to man the ideological police? Who are going to decide who stays and who leaves who's anti-freedom and who's pro-freedom and I am I pro-freedom or anti-freedom? Well depends who you talked I Mean objectively and pro-freedom, but nobody cares about objectivity. Is there an objectivity police out there? Is there anybody you trust to be objective about these issues? Should leftist leave should rightist leave should people in the middle who can't frigging make up their own mind about anything Should they leave I complain bitterly about America all the time and lots of people have told me to leave Am I the person you would like to leave? Would that make America better? No You don't like it here then leave is not an argument And it's not appropriate Certainly not certainly not by the president of the United States. I can imagine in an argument you're getting into Well if you hate America so much, why don't you move to Europe or if you love Europe so much Why don't you move to Europe? But that's not what a president does a President has not Worked to divide a country does not work to inflame differences He points out the differences. He condemns bad ideas But he does not tell American citizens to leave America that is un-American. I'd say that's anti-American I mean you can you can accuse I mean and and I did I said Obama was the most anti-American president in American history But you know what so's Trump in a different way But Trump is fundamentally anti-American and and his idea of leaving is an anti-American idea in America We fight for change in America We argue we debate We convince We don't kick people out we don't demand that they leave and when a president says something it's a demand You know you've been talking about the the bankruptcy of our our modern intellectuals and I know that in your most recent book This is really a manifesto to a group that you called the new intellectuals But you mind telling me just who they are in your own words and how they differ from the old style intellectuals Since the old style the presently existing intellectuals have declared their own bankruptcy by abandoning the intellect What we need today what are called a new intellectual would be any man or woman who is willing to think Meaning any man or woman who knows that men's life must be guided by reason By the intellect not by feelings wishes wins or mystic revelations Any man or woman who values his life and who does not get want to give in to today's cult of the spare cynicism and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist


Welcome to our all-day movie workshop, I'm Peter and we're experiencing some technical issues in our studio today, so I'm coming from a different location, but we'll still continue on with the movie.  So we're going to start with a movie from David. And then we're going to have a 10-minute break afterwards, and that will be followed by our breakout rooms where you'll get to share whatever has come up with you during the movie. And then we'll have a 45-minute break, and then I'll be holding the closing session today. So I can pass it over to you now, David. Thank you. Thank you, Peter. Hi, everyone. Nice to see you all smiling. Wow. We have a great, great day set up for you. And, yeah, we just, we, we tend to have some very, very deep, deep classic movies that are kind of like mind-openers that are the equivalent of taking sometimes LSD. And some people have said, give me a break, David, these last four movies. I mean, what are you trying to do? Do I have a few months left on Earth, or give me a few years, or are you just trying to just rip the cord off of my, off of my wrist? What are you gonna, what are you doing here? What is Jesus doing? It's starting to get real swirly. It's starting to get surreal. And so then when that happens, I always remember lesson 133. I will not value what, what is valueless, where Jesus says, from time to time, in this teachings, if it seems very theoretical, it's good to bring the student back to practical concerns. He does that in lesson 133. He says, oh, let's come on back now. You know, you still believe you have feet on Earth. Okay. Let's, let's be practical. Let's really be practical. So after eternal sunshine of the spotless mind, if your mind wasn't blown by that, we came in with full of grace. Mother Mary, deep meditative reverent dive, dive, dive down into the light. And then our last couple of movies, Solaris, hold on to your hats, because linear time is going bye bye. And then if that wasn't enough, we came in with the nines last week.  I had one person said she threw up after the movie. But Marina was relating it to me. She said, no, but it was good. It was good. It was healing vomit. Good. Well, you know, it's the unconscious mind. You know, we're, we're just stirring up the ego. It's like taking the taking a stick and putting it in a hornet's nest. These last four movies is like sticking in a stick in a hornet's nest. And the hornets are not happy. The ego is not happy with that stick. So today, Jesus is saying, let's get back to like romantic comedy. After all this, we need to have a romantic comedy, spiritual, deep, profound, but a little bit on the light side. So I hope we don't have anybody vomiting today after the movie. I think I think this is actually a soft way. It's like going into heaven on a soft pillow, just letting yourself relax and letting yourself be carried by a beautiful, beautiful parable and a beautiful, beautiful movie. So as usual, the movie for today is the result of your, your votes. And wow, we came up with some amazing themes, and you all voted and this is how it came out this week. And on the top of the combined poll, I say combined because as most of you know, we have a combined poll between an English poll, a tribe online community poll, and a Spanish poll. And then we put them all together and we look at the top themes, and then usually around Thursday or Friday, I just start praying and praying, looking at the themes, praying, hoping to receive a movie that will take us into the experience. So here are the top themes for this week. Very good. They're very, very, very deep themes. Number one is how to have the experience of being done through, you know, of being like the body is like a puppet, and the one that's holding the crossbar above is, is the Holy Spirit. And so the words that come through the puppet's mouth are from the Holy Spirit. The actions that come from the puppet are the actions inspired by the Holy Spirit. And I know a lot of people often have a lot of questions about this being done through being animated by the Holy Spirit and listening to one voice and having only one purpose. And then everything that the body seems to say and do is coming from the Holy Spirit. So there's no person that has to figure out how to be done through. This is just from your prayer in your heart, just your desire. When you just pray and say Holy Spirit, Jesus, use me. Being done through is, is an expression of that. Also, some of you might remember that Jesus talks about the mind and he talks about consciousness as being the domain of the ego. Because in heaven, there is no consciousness. Consciousness is a realm where there are levels in heaven. It's just pure oneness is pure light. But in consciousness, there are levels. And Jesus in the clarification of terms in A Course in Miracles says that this mind that seems now to be believe in consciousness, which is a belief. It basically is spoken about as if it has two parts. So in heaven is pure oneness just pure love, eternity, infinity. And then consciousness is the domain where the mind training occurs. And it's described as if it has two parts. And it's a right mind and a wrong mind. The Holy Spirit lives in and is the right mind. And Jesus is with us right now in the right mind. And the wrong mind is the ego. And that's the part that perceives fragmented perception, perceives different people, different places, different things as if their separation is real. That's the wrong mind. It's just a belief. You know, the whole point of enlightenment and spiritual awakening is to laugh at that belief in division, in fragmentation, in conflict, in preferences, in opinions. You just want to laugh at it. You know, that's the whole point of everything that we're doing is just to laugh at the ego. And see it's nothingness. Jesus saw it's nothingness. And in the Bible it says, be of good cheer. I have overcome the world. That's what he was talking about. He said Satan is underfoot. Beautiful. Well, that's pretty, that's pretty graphic, but he's basically saying I have transcended the ego. And so will you. Basically you were with me. He says, when I awoke you were with me so he's like, you're right. We're the same one really, you just have to realize it. You know, it's already done. It's a done deal. You can't mess it up. It's just a matter of your willingness and your prayers to bring it into your actual awareness and your experience. So this consciousness receives messages from above will say the Holy Spirit and below the ego and consciousness does induce action. So when you talk about being done through it's not there's a personal you there's no personality self that really is deciding what it's going to do today. There's really no personality cells that can decide things in the world. Oh, am I going to be single or married? Am I going to be living this country or that country? Am I going to study this spirituality or that spirituality? Am I going to have a salad for lunch today or a sandwich? No, the one that seems to be deciding the things of the world is the ego. And Jesus is saying it's a joke. That's why this world is a joke. He says it's a joke to think that time can come to circumvent eternity.  You're trying to circle it. You're trying to circumvent eternity. And he's laughing. He's always laughing. No matter what the situation is, no matter what the circumstance, Jesus is always gently laughing. You just feel that in your heart. It's just, no matter how dramatic you perceive the situation, he's still like, he's like still laughing. And oftentimes, you know, you go, what's so funny? And he's like, it's a joke. I don't get it. But today we're going to try to get the joke. We're going to try to really get the joke today. Okay, second one. Second of the poll results. Living in divine provenance. That just means that you realize that as a person, you don't do anything good or bad or right or wrong. You're not personally responsible for surviving on planet Earth, even though most of us believe we needed to have lots of education and skills and abilities. We do jobs, work careers and do a lot of household chores. Keep your house clean. Keep your refrigerator clean in order. You know, on and on and on. If you have a car, keep your car running. You know, keep the body working. That's a lot of pressure. Because remember in the back of our minds going, it's, it's just one big joke and you, you're taking it also serious medications, all kinds of things. I got to go in for surgery. I got to do this. I got to do that.  He's never serious. He absolutely is never serious. He never goes, uh-oh. He never goes, oh, you blew it. He just laughs, even when you're sure you blew it. He's laughing. He's always laughing. Okay, third theme, the guiding principle is love and your intuition. The only thing that is perceived in this world, the guiding principle is love. Sometimes people say, what makes the world go around? Well, in one sense that the energy, the power of the mind is rooted in love. It's rooted in the only law that there is the law of love. And of course, you read it in the course in less than 50, Jesus says, I am sustained by the love of God. That's, that's what the love, the guiding principle is. That's also what the divine providence is from the previous thing. It's love. Love is the source of divine providence. Love is the source that gives us the reflection of the forgiven world and the happy dream. And every single action that the body does, or that we perceive from anyone. The guiding principle that is underneath the making of this world, it's obviously making up form and fragmenting that form is an attempt at miscreation. The only problem with miscreation is it's not real. That's why Jesus is laughing. You can't miscreate. Because if you could, it would be, it would be dark, it would be dire, and it's not. So Jesus is always reminding us you don't have the power to miscreate. You have the power to create like God does in spirit, but you don't have the power to miscreate. Okay, number four, letting go of family roles. 44 votes. What we were watching today has has a bit of that in it, because family roles are part of the ego's self concept. So there's guilt tied in to these roles. You may say, is it a problem to, to, to be in the roles and Jesus is basically saying well, your one role is forgiveness. Your one sole responsibility is atonement. So Jesus, Holy Spirit, they say we're fine with faith. We know the ego made up all these roles, but we can use them to unwind your mind from the ego. So basically in terms of all the guilt around these roles, Jesus is just saying no problem. I got it. I got your back here. You're not going to laugh at this at one point. You're, you're not going to feel guilty anymore. You're not going to be so serious. Oh, but I failed in my role. Well, Jesus is like, yeah, yeah. Yeah, the ego made the role and the ego made the feeling of failure. So let's come back a little further and laugh at this thing. Let's not get too serious about these roles. In the movie coming up, we're going to have a husband and a wife and a son. So we've got a cute little family. And then we're going to have an angel. And the angel has been sent in to help undo the conflict, the conflicts that are going on in the self concept. And the last one, 42 votes. This one could be right on top as well. You can flip them around if you want clarity about the authority problem. You know, that's the only problem there is is the belief that you can author yourself. It's the belief that you're the author of yourself is is a lie. God is the author of Christ and Christ is the self. So the belief that you can author yourself sets in motion a perceptual temper tantrum called linear time and space. And, and the authority problem is, is the fundamental question around who is the author of of my, my identity. That's what the authority problem is it really doesn't involve authority figures because when we look at parents or we look at police officers or we look at judges or ruling politicians or ruling political parties. No, that's the projection of the authority problem. We, there's really no authority issue. And oftentimes in relationships, the authority issue will get projected out on to the relationship so it seems like it's one person trying to control another person that's not it either. It's just in the mind, the mind believing it can create itself is what generates the authority problem. Now, we'll go back to the top theme, how to have the experience of being done through. For most people who work with the course. One of the biggest struggles and issues is the idea that that Jesus is a symbol that is a role model, except that he seemed to have his earth life 2000 years ago. So we can have emotion pictures before we, we could have recordings of what was actually said and what was done, and, and have like a reality TV series when you love that. Maybe we can form some kind of a channel if we can work it out with our mind, instead of Gaia, it will come up with our own channel where we'll, we'll get access to the Akashic records, and we'll get permission to go back and then we'll do the whole thing and that would be helpful, but people say that's that would be cool. Like nice camera like the Truman show except instead of Truman, Jesus Christ is is the is the one that is going through the show of awakening and we get to follow. There's cameras everywhere we get to see everything.  What are they talking about zoom in to the shirt Mike, to the road Mike.  Full blown reality TV show with Jesus as the reality TV star. Well, the only problem is is that we haven't done it yet it's to it's 2000 years ago, we still have scholars that are debating whether Jesus even existed in linear time. So we're a little far away we have the Kardashians. Meanwhile, we have some other reality TV shows going but how to have the experience of being done through. Well the movie we're going to watch today is very cool because Denzel Washington. That's right Denzel is going to play an angel, and we need to watch movies with angels. And how many of you believe in angels. Yeah, I've had so many experiences in my life I've even had people that I've lived with who have channeled music from the angels. There's just been so much of us. So maybe since Denzel is playing an angel in the movie. I'll talk just a little bit about angels I'll give a little context on the last three decades I've been teaching about what are what are angels. But I want to come back to Denzel and the role of an angel, because angels are symbols of the Holy Spirit's love for us their symbols of help their symbols of comfort. Their symbols of wisdom, their symbols of willingness, willingness to follow, follow the Holy Spirit, their symbols of the willingness to follow the Holy Spirit. They may take a form, or they may take many different forms. And that depends on the perceiver, which is the mind and what's the mind values and what the mind is terrified of. So for example, if, if you're used to having a cup of tea at night by your bed and putting the tea on the bedstand and it would scare you to have an angel show up sitting on your bed. It would, if that would freak you out then it's not going to happen the angels don't appear where they're not asked to appear. They're not, they're not intrusive. They're not like sentinels in the matrix they did they don't have any intrusiveness they just are soft reminders and helpers, and they're symbols. If you want a symbol in form, then, and you believe in the helpfulness of a symbol in form and that is can be fulfilled with with an with an angel. So in the movie of today. We are going to watch the preacher's wife. 1996. Denzel Washington, Whitney Houston, Whitney Houston plays the preacher's wife. And in the movie, Whitney Houston her name is Julia Biggs, and her husband is a minister, the Reverend Henry Biggs, and the angel that is sent to answer the reverence prayer for help, he's just reached a place of overwhelm. And so he cries out much like Bill Fedford called out and said there must be a better way help. And then basically Helen Shuckman said you're right Bill, and I'll help you find it. Well, in this movie. The Reverend Henry Biggs is reached a place of frustration, overwhelm, and he's a minister so I don't know if, if any of you have ever had the role of minister but it's like any role in the world, you can ego can make it stressful. It's a role that you come up with that the ego makes it can make stressful. So it's not just ministers but in this case, Henry is very distressed, and he calls out for help and deadly. That's who Denzel Washington plays deadly is the angel who who is sent to earth to help Henry, and to help Julia. And then, Jeremiah, who that's a real biblical name. This is, they're using real strong biblical symbols minister symbol Jeremiah. There was a song called joy to the world with three dog night but that was Jeremiah is like a famous biblical character, the battle of Jericho. Basically, Dudley is coming in to provide help to the situation. Now why is that important is because our top pole is how to have the experience of being done through. Well if you want a good example of being done through. Dudley is a good example, an angel is a really good example of being done through. Maybe you want to start thinking of your personality self as an angel. That would be a good start. If you if you say, I really want to be done through. But I have problems. I wish I was an angel, but I have problems. So I have a block wish I was an angel but my friends and family my mom doesn't call me. She has a few other words choice words angel is not one of them. But basically, you have to start to think of yourself as an angel because if the body was made by the ego and you give it to the Holy Spirit and Jesus, then, of course, the Holy Spirit and Jesus will use it. And they will use it actually very angelically, you will inspire happiness and joy by the way the Holy Spirit and Jesus use, use the body. So the body was made by the ego as a symbol of separation as a symbol of differences as a symbol of pride and uniqueness wiped clean now new purpose to be done through by Jesus and the Holy Spirit to unwind from the ego. So let's just step back for a second to a bigger context like that's why this number one theme of really having an experience of being done through is so important is because it's, it's quite difficult to go from seeing yourself as a body to seeing yourself as pure spirit. There has to be a transitory phase in which the dream starts to feel less judgmental and then more bright and more happy and more consistently happy and that's when you start approaching being done through. If you think of the earth and time and space sometimes I call it different adjectives I caught distraction bill. Okay, I often call the world and and linear time distraction bill but but for today's top theme I'm going to call earth, not the planet of the apes. Earth is the planet of the doers. Okay, this is the planet of the doers.  In fact, you can't even get here if you unless you believe in doing, because doing involves what the body. Yeah, there's no if there's no body then how can you say I didn't do enough. How can you say how could you ever say I didn't get that done. Who what the body didn't do enough with the body didn't finish the test the body didn't get the job done. The body is not enough. Now Jesus is saying, this is the planet of the doers, and you don't escape the planet of the doers by just wishing. I wish I weren't here. Some of some of us have said that I wish I wish I wasn't even here. I read the course. Now I wish I wasn't here. Jesus is like well, let's have some fun and let's, you know, we're fine with fake and the body is fake we're fine with fake but let's have some fun.  Because the sweater is not the problem or the scarf I see Marcus got a scarf on. I don't. Let's not blame the scarf. Let's not blame the scarf let's just wear it loosely, not choking up to type but let's wear it loosely and it looks pretty and it's nice warmth on the neck and that's good. And let's just let it be used for a while, and then let's gently take it off, because we don't need to scarf anymore we don't need the body. At some point you you'll in your mind you'll say I have no need for this body anymore. And Jesus will laugh and laugh at the idea that you ever thought you needed. You'll have a good laugh at that one too, but he's just laughing at everything. So this is important because on the planet of the doers. You can escape by allowing the Holy Spirit and Jesus to use the body and be done through. So allow yourself to entertain the idea that you can use the rest of your time on earth to be angelic. Why not. It's not so bad really, you know, to be to be angelic what's wrong with that, you know. And if people say that's not good, you know you can listen but you know, if people say well, angelic that sounds really boring. Well, that's how the ego sees angels is very boring. And if people say being angelic that's going to ruin my love life.  Well, maybe you don't know what love is. If being angelic will ruin your love life and maybe you have a twisted perception of what love is. Maybe you don't know. Maybe that's the better thing to say I don't know what love is but maybe if I'm being done through. Knowing what divine universal a gap a love is it's all about. So that's what this movie is. This movie is is not quite like the last movie where our friend Gary pulls the strap on his wrist and the whole world slowly fades and disappears. This is a movie that's an answer to the prayer of how to have the experience of being done through.  And and Denzel has his mother is very, very devoted to Jesus and and he's had he was grew up, you know, in that thing of being baptized and and baptized in the Holy Ghost and all that. And now this is probably one of Denzel's major contributions to our movie watchers guide to enlightenment. This is this is one of his starring roles. It's an absolute classic. And, and it's so beautiful because he's allowing his body to be used in an angelic role that is giving us all a good role model. A practical role model for how to navigate time and space. He he's as a symbol he will still seem to have his few difficulties and struggles. But that's the way with all angels in all the movies throughout history. What's the most famous angel movie that you can think of. What's the most famous angel I know there was a TV series in the United States called touch by an angel but I think coming in at ding ding number one. It's a wonderful life with James Jimmy Stewart. And, and in that movie which I remember, I think every Christmas when I was growing up, I would turn on the TV and there was this black and white movie that was playing every Christmas, not only every Christmas but basically all of December. Every time I turn the channel on is a wonderful life. It's a wonderful life. In that movie, Clarence is the angel. Clarence is the angel and Clarence is sent to earth to help the main character played by Jimmy Stewart and and Clarence has an assignment to be truly helpful so that he can earn his wings. In a sense, we could think that's kind of like Denzel, he's, he's coming to be done through to be truly helpful, so that he can earn his wings and fly off, fly back to God and lay them in one list. So that's, that's an example of it. Now a little bit of background on the movie we're going to watch the preacher's wife. In 1996 is actually an adaptation or a remake of a 1947 movie called the bishops wife.  Go back and watch the first one to why not treat yourself to the bishops wife. But Denzel playing the angel, it's Kerry Grant playing the angel. Judy Judy Judy Judy. We're remembering you Judy sketch with some. That was his, it's one of his family. Judy Judy Judy, except I can't do the accent. But Kerry Grant is plays the angel, the red a young place the wife, instead of Whitney Houston, and, and David Nibbin.  He's got to be one of the best actors playing a minister I've ever seen in my life so the original 1947. If you've got mwg.org, watch it with with on there I think we've got it on there. But the original story was a novella written back in 1928. And so this is the classic parable was written in 1928 came out as a movie with Samuel Golden, Goldman in 1947. And in 1996, Samuel Goldman son, Samuel Goldman junior did the preacher's wife. And that's what we're watching today you see you can even feel the presence of the novel and the two movies that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are just using this over the decades. The same, the same classic movie is being used and reused as a teaching device. So, first there was the novella Jesus said did you get it. Okay, let's do a movie. My grand would really pull it off Samuel Goldman studio. Did you get it. 1996 Denzel Whitney Houston, a voice like Whitney Houston gospel music. My God, did you get it. Okay, now is 2021. Now David is going to. Let's take it again let's try it one more time. It just takes one instant right so it doesn't matter all we need to do is really feel and experience the glory of being done through. Because we only escaped this world of time and space through the, the purpose of being done through. So I think you're going to laugh today. I think you might cry, but in a good way happy tears. I think your heart is going to like burst open, because the lesson is so beautiful and so strong. Before we start the movie the last thing I want to leave you with is, I went on to Instagram and our course and miracles Instagram. There was a poster. And the poster was the preacher's wife. Instagram, even on Instagram. The thing that caught my attention was, it's their son in the movie little Jeremiah big he's the little boy that Henry and Julie have and this is what the quote is the quote is from the boy in the movie the sun. And this is what it is. Just because you can't see the air. Doesn't keep you from breathing. And just because you can't see God doesn't keep you from believing. Wow. That's the, that's the preacher's son. I think maybe we could have another sequel. Jeremiah. Whoo, that is a prophet Jeremiah speaking through little teeny Jeremiah, the little boy in the movie. So, I hope you enjoy the movie, and I will pop in from time to time. And we actually curses here with me and Andy and because the power went out down in Mexico. We are, I have to say it we are broadcasting live from Camus, Utah. That's right. Camus Utah is the cat has nine lives and that this I see you AC you know Camus is not going easily tripod. Put her paw down. The first time we took the humans tried to do something tripod put her firm third paw down and said no. But we are activated we are streaming the movie here from Camus. So Jesus is going to have some fun today so enjoy the movie, and I will see you all very shortly I'll be popping in.