Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebreaks.com coming to you live from Hermosa Beach, California. We're back home from Chicago. Thanks everybody who checked in with us, who said hello and who supported us through the national and beyond and before and beyond. 2020, 2021, Penise like basketball. This is a four box pick your team break number 13 from the website jaspyscasebreaks.com. A very big thank you to all of these wonderful people for getting in on the action. There you go. Thanks everybody for making this happen. So breaks 13, 14 and 15 are all from the same case. Thanks. And Miles had that triple last ball mojo about the last three teams. That's why he has that star next to his name. Here's the case of select fresh case. Now this dropped while we were at the national and gosh, there was a lot of a lot of buzz about it. I think at the national, a lot of people, a lot of breakers around me were breaking it and there seemed to be a lot of satisfied customers. I know some people were a little bummed that maybe a hobby gets watered down a little bit because of all the retail that's coming out with select, but that might be more academic because I feel like from the ground level, no one really cared. They were really happy about select and the quality of it and everyone's having fun with it, which is what, which is the whole whole point of this having fun. All right. So we got the dice right here 123 for the left six and four five. No, we're doing four box breaks. My bad. I was doing six box half cases at the national. So here's four right there. You can see me stack the four right here. Here's a stack of four right here, another stack of four right there. There we go. One, two, three, four, five, six on the dice roll. Three, one, two, three, four, here's five, six. So let me just mark these boxes so we all know they're from the same case. The national was a lot of fun. Once again, thanks to everybody who bought spots in our national breaks. We still have, when those national breaks come back from, come back from Chicago at the end of the week, we'll finish those breaks off and then give and do the big giveaway too. And I'm sure it could run another four boxes back later tonight. But yeah, the national was a lot of fun. So thanks everybody once again for the support. Was lovely to see all the people at the national. Some familiar names in the chat, finally seeing them in person. Like Mac. Like Mac McCarthy saw him. He's got a buddy that is with CPD, thinking about contacting some of the big auction places in work security. I think more and more people, more and more booths and from those major auction houses are increasing their security. A lot of attention on the hobby in the last couple of years or so. TJ saying that, speaking of retail, someone, your Walmart closest to you has put cards back on the shelves, tons of contenders football and mega chronicles football. Check your local Walmarts or targets and let me know if anyone is seeing the same. This is Pick Your Team 13. All the random teams are on the Mad Max truck coming back from Chicago. Rolling through the West and the Southwest and coming back to California so all the random teams will do when they come back. All right. We're going to lead off with Draymond Green and we've got Devin Vassel, 46 out of 199, Jersey and Autograph. Little dark right here. We've got the sunlight blasting through here so see what we've got there. Devin Vassel going to the Spurs that will be four miles. That's one of his last spot mojo teams. There you go, Miles. Last spot mojo, 70% of the time. It's 100% of the time. Got Damien Lillard. I don't know if I could keep track of all the changes in the NBA, folks, in all these trade grades. We've got 54 out of 99, Derek Coleman, Lyme Green, old New Jersey Nets. This will go to Brooklyn Shane with the Nets. We did have, yeah, I was closer to the entrance there. You can kind of see it in the window behind me but that just shows most of the shop floor. Oh, yeah. That was a crash. Yeah, that was a truck that ran into a pole, the power pole across the street from us. Thankfully, we weren't on the same grid so we were all right. There's Grant Riller, rookie tri-color for Charlotte. That'll be for Gary. In Fuego, Luca D'Anges, I think these inserts are pretty short-printed. I think Darren was reminding me when this first came out. It's pretty cool. Old rookie silver, Vernon Kerry Jr., some Yanis, and a die-cut Sadiq Bey, rookie die-cut for the Pistons, 249. Ben saying whether in Cali not awesome in August, it's pretty awesome. At least by the beach here in Hermosa Beach, California, it's pretty nice at, what time is it right now? At 5.37 in the afternoon, 71 degrees. It's a little toaster when you go inland closer like Staples Center and stuff like that, but it's pretty nice along the coast. It's RJ Hampton, rookie silver, Cole Anthony, rookie tri-color for Orlando. That's going to be for EA, and a Deni Avigia silver for Mark B and the Wizards, concourse edition. Oh, and a nice Anthony Edwards courtside, the base courtside, but the courtside level, the courtside tier is the shortest printed one. It's for Jimmy and the T-boards. There's a Capazzo to 1.99 for Denver, that's going to be for Shane, another Anthony Edwards, and a Precious Achua, piece of his jersey, heading out two miles in the heat, another one of his last-bought Mojo team, so two of his three last-bought Mojo teams have hit 70% of the time, 100% of the time. This Anthony Edwards is the Premier level. Premier, Premier, it's to 1.49 on the Thio Maladon, Dan with the Thunder, and Isaac the Coro back here as well for the Cavs. All right, box one in the books, one of four. Another four box break is in the store right now, and I think we're actually pretty close to knocking out another one of those. I think pick your team 14 is down to five. Down to five teams left, that'll be, if you're watching live, that'll be Nets, Cavs, Heat, Trailblazers, and San Antonio Spurs. You can pick your teams right there. Now basketball, lots of crazy things happening. Bulls land Lonzo Ball for 85 million bucks. They get Alex Caruso for $37 million. Mike Conley staying with the Jazz on a three-year deal, Nix to resign Berks, and Noel as well. Cavs retain Jared Allen on a five-year, $100 million dollar deal, I like Jared Allen's game. Mavs keep Hardaway with a four-year deal. Nuggets keep Barton and give Jeff Green a two-year deal. Heat and Jimmy Butler moving forward with a Max deal. The Heat also added Kyle Lowry, CP3 staying with the Suns. He got extended for a little bit. What else is happening here? Kind of wish Lakers were able to afford to keep Alex Caruso, but Alas, no. Nicholas Batum agreeing to return to the LA Clippers two-year deal. Derrick Rose agreeing with a three-year deal to return to the Nix. Evan Fournier returning to the Nix four-year deal. Solomon Hill one-year deal with the ATL. This is all wojness from today, going from most current to oldest. Solomon Hill one-year deal with the Hawks. Dwight Howard returning to LA. Lakers for his third stint with the Lakers. Never should have let him go last year. I don't know what happened last year. Trevor Ariza back with the Lakers. Trevor Ariza, I feel like, was always a fan favorite. So glad to have him back. Mike Muscala two-year deal with OKC. Zach Collins three-year deal with the Spurs. Gary Trent Jr. three-year deal to return to the Raptors. Korkmaz, who is a great off-the-bench three-point guy. Three-year, $15 million. Reggie Bullock agreeing to deal with the Mavs. Boban Marjanovic back with the Mavs. Moe Harkless two-year deal with the Kings. Sterling Brown, this is just more for me now. Sterling Brown two-year deal with the Mavs. Jeff Green two-year deal with the Nuggets. Doug McDermott three-year deal with the Spurs. Chris Ball, once again, opted out and then re-signed for another four-year deal. Tori Craig, Pacers, Duncan Robinson, five years to say five years 90 to stay with the Heat. Teja McConnell four-year 35 to stay with the Pacers. So on and so forth. Any other bigger news that I missed here? The Bulls deal for the for Alonzo is four years 85 and a sign in trade. So yeah, it's crazy. And I still think the Lakers who are reconstructing their team a little bit, I think they're still interested in trying to get Buddy Healed from the Kings on some sort of sign and trade with Dennis Schruder. But I don't know if they want Dennis Schruder. Nice obi top in rookie jersey and auto. Nix, Sean O'Leary with the Nix. So I think they're still trying to get that, but they may need to get a third team involved if they could land Buddy Healed. Sean O with the Nix. There's Tim Hardaway, Jr. Re-signed extension. James almost said James. No, James. James Winston, but James Weisman. Rookie Premier level for Golden State. That'll be for Sean O. And in Fuego, Donovan Mitchell, Utah Jazz. That'll be for Jose Adios and the Jazzy Jazz. And we got a silver obi top in Premier level. Nice. That's for Sean O and the New York Nix. Yeah, there's a lot of money in basketball. A lot of above average to above average guys getting paid. Yeah, I guess supply and demand. There's just not too many, you know, rosters aren't very big in basketball. Hachimura silver. There's a Patrick Williams and another James Weisman. And a Gerald Green, 63 out of 99. Rockets in flight autograph. Serenity with Houston. Jeremy saying that his Pacers are coming for everyone. Or not. All right. See you, Jesse. Thank you. Rookie silver, Cole Anthony. That'll be for Orlando. That's going to go to EA. Nice. Concourse silver. Zion courtside. For the Pelicans, that'll be for Sean O.  Malachi Flynn. Rookie silver for Toronto, Mark. There's the die cut for the Sixers. That's going to be for Gary. Darren Porcing, if I was a team owner or a GM, you would just sign a bunch of D-League guys they can ball to. It's tricky because I think that, yeah, regular season, I think if you're a sharp GM, regular season, you could probably get away with a good scouting department. You could probably get away with getting some D-League guys in there, finding a lot of value. But I think once you get to the playoffs, that's where a bulk of these guys are making their money, that's where they should be earning their paychecks. There's Onyeka Okongwu. Nice gold parallel. Steven Olson, Atlanta Hawks. One out of 10, the first one ever made. It's pretty good, too. There's a John Morant courtside for Memphis. That's going to be for Brian. There's Bojan Bogdanovich. 64 out of 149 for the Jazz. Jose with Utah. Yeah, Jeremy's just happy that McConnell's coming back. There's LeBron. RJ Hampton to 199. There's Sabonis. And Udoka. This is the last year. At some point, some products will have his New Jersey number, right? This might be the last year for that Jersey number in upcoming basketball products. All right. Halfway through this four box break, here's box three. What else? Did I miss any other big free agency news? What is your team, everyone, and are you happy with the moves or lack of moves? Happy, unhappy? Or do you feel? Where do you land on all this? For my Lakers, I'm pretty happy with cautiously happy, cautiously optimistic about the Lakers. I think, like I said, I've been saying this all week that all the moves Lakers make won't matter unless Anthony Davis is 100% in both the regular season and the playoffs. We're close to it. Can't miss really too many games, especially the playoffs. So I think the key was really around Anthony Davis. So hopefully he'll be. If he can do that, then the lack of, quote unquote, the lack of shooters around LeBron and Russell Westbrook won't really matter all that much. Defensively, Anthony Davis is super important. But Anthony Davis is really the key. And that'll allow LeBron James to kind of be able to not use him as much throughout the regular season, keep him fresh for the postseason, and start with Anthony Davis. So hopefully he's working on that. But Westbrook is interesting. Dwight Howard coming back is a good backup for Anthony Davis. So hopefully that should help alleviate some of the regular season grind, some of that pressure off of him. Ooh, a Magic Johnson one-of-one autograph. Magic Johnson. He's a magic man. Sean O'Leary with the Lakers gets the one-of-one Magic Johnson autograph. That is sharp. That is nice. Our first train whistle of the day. And after coming back from the national, Sean O'Leary all aboard the Big Head Express. Woo-hoo. There's ADs, speaking of AD Davis. There's Anthony Edwards. We've got a Desmond Bain insert. Yeah, we'll see how the rest of the Lakers line up. A little interested on how Westbrook is going to fit in with the Lakers team. There's Kyle Lowry, Raptors, 21-25, making his move to the heat. Love this tie-dye, though, for Toronto. Mark, there's a LeBron James tricolor. I think Westbrook will play well with his other teammates. I don't think that's going to be too much of an issue. I think he's only had to be a focal point of offense, because he had to be, to shoulder the offensive burden. But he doesn't have to do that. It's going to make him a more well-balanced player. Emmanuel Quickly-Silver for the Knicks. That will be for Sean O. Obi-Top and Quartzside also going to Sean O. Rex, what's going on? No, that hockey is not busted open yet. If you click the link that Nightbot just dropped, and there's always a schedule in the chat, if you click that, you'll see the exact time for estimated time on when we're going to do that break.  Anthony Edwards' premier level for the T-Wolves, Jimmy. Is it next? It might be next. I don't know, whatever the schedule says. I need the schedule just as much as you guys. Now, what did I say? Lakers, we're looking at Buddy Heel, right? Buddy Heel would look pretty good on this team. Westbrook, Buddy Heel, LeBron, Anthony Davis, Dwight Howard. Hopefully, if they re-signed THT, it would be pretty cool, too. Sadiq Bay, red to $199. I mean, is this guy going to get moved? Is Ben Simmons going to be traded? That would be interesting to see. Sadiq Bay will go to the Piston. That's for Roy. That Piston seem could be interesting, Roy. This is Eric Pascal. Because they're adding the number one overall pick, Kate Cunningham, who could be a franchise-changing player surrounded by some solid players, some solid youngsters at the Pistons have drafted. There are a couple of additions here and there. Pistons could be ahead of schedule. Speaking of the Pistons, there's Sadiq Bay. He's of his jersey, right? I think Sadiq Bay's still on there. There's Andrew Brewster, Pistons fan, and I'm happy. Got another shooter for Kate. Yeah, I mean, Isaiah Stewart, I think, had looked pretty good too. So they've got some interesting youngsters. They added Kelly Oleneck. Let's look at their death chart right there for a few years. Right, so this is an interesting team. Think about this. Killian Hayes, Kate Cunningham, Sadiq Bay, Jeremy Grant, Isaiah Stewart, good young player. They've got some interesting youngsters. They develop some of these young guys over the next couple of years, watch them grow, spend a little money on some free agents. Kate Cunningham could be like the sort of emerging superstar. Watch him develop over the next handful of years. Could be interesting. Fourth and final box, pick a team, number 13. Thanks to everybody who got into the action. Rex is saying, yeah, I noticed that, Rex, yeah. Switching to baseball really quick. Rex is saying all three of the X Cubs did homeruns in their debut. Did Chris Bryant end up hitting a homerun in his debut too? I know Rizzo and Baez did. You're saying three, so Chris Bryant must have. The Giants, and he did. Speaking of Chicago, Bulls are interesting too, right? I like the Lanzo edition. They've been working, Lanzo's been working on a shot. It looked a lot better last year, so maybe you can keep that up this year. They got Alex Caruso, who I really like. He's great, versatile, intense, can play some defense. Zach Lavine's still there, Patrick Williams still growing. They got Vusevich from last year, you know, so a couple of other moves here and there. Could be really nice. That's right, yeah. Seiku Dumboya, going back to the Pistons. Seiku, he's still around. A lot of interesting things happening. Here's our first Lamello. And a silver Cole Anthony Premier edition. It's gonna be for EA in the Magic. And our first Lamello ball, our concourse edition going for Gary, going to Gary. It's for Gary and the Charlotte Hornets. Hopefully we can find a few more before we close out this box. There's Bradley Beale, piece of his jersey going to Mark and the Wizards, and all of these cards will ship, ladies and gentlemen. Yeah, you know, Pistons also have, Pistons also have Josh Jackson, who I think was playing okay. He kind of washed out with the sun. Here's Patrick Williams, speaking of. Autograph, nice. We did not, Kevin. We still have to finish off the rest of those national breaks, which are coming back from the Mad Max truck at the end of the week. It's barreling down the highway from Chicago. Coming back to here, coming back here to LA. On the bottom of the website, jaspyscasebreaks.com. 81 out of 99 on that, Patrick Williams. Line green for Sean T. And the Bulls. Yeah, so Josh Jackson's okay. Diallo, it's fine, they got some death too. Saban Lee, Dennis Smith Jr., Frank Jackson. And a tie-dye to 25. Court side, Bradley Beale, 21 out of 25, that's nice. Mark with the Washington Wizards. Bradley Beale, maybe on the, is he on the move? Where is he gonna end up? Does he stay with Washington? Steph Curry, scope. There's Killian Hayes, more Pistons, that's Feroi. Alexi Pokusevsky for OKC, for Dan, tricolor, rookie tricolor. James Weisman, Joel Enbyd-Silver, Joel Enbyd-Courtside. Steph Curry, white parallel to 149. For Golden State, Sean O. Aaron Naismith, rookie tricolor for Boston. That'll be for Karen. Kelton Johnson, die cut to 175 for the Spurs, Miles. CJ Elby, rookie silver for the Trailblazers and Kendrick Nunn in the back, right there. And there you go, ladies and gentlemen, that was 2021, Panini Select basketball four box, third of a case. Pick your team, number 13. From the first four boxes from a fresh case. So we still have the second third and the final third to go on jaskyscasebreaks.com. Let's fill it up, let's make it happen. I'll see you next time for the next one, bye.


We are live to the world from Albuquerque, New Mexico. It's noon on T Tuesday. This is an experiment. There's folks watching on the live stream. Hi everybody. It really makes it exciting. I want to explain what we just looked at, and that's going to be the major activity of this update, as well as just trying to kick the tires on this crazy stuff. So let's get into it. So for those of us who are just joining us, what is this all about? What is the T2Tile project all about? It's about building indefinitely scalable systems. I find that when we build engineering systems, we just build a machine, and a machine has edges. And what we tend to do is throw all the inconvenient stuff to the edge, all the waste, the garbage, the pollution, the cost to society, and so forth. We push them to the edge and let them drop. The idea of indefinite scalability is saying, no, what if you can't do that? What if you have to build the system and your design has to go arbitrarily far? So it has to account for everything. In computing, that means we have to give up on the idea of central processing and random access memory. We have to give up on the idea of deterministic execution that computers are completely repeatable. How are we going to do it? Well, that's what the T2Tile project is all about.  This is the T2Tile that we've been working on for the last many years now. The point is we can repeat this and make as many as we want and connect it to copies of itself. The point is it's all completely decentralized and bottom up.  We don't have that here. It's all working from the bottom, and each individual tile, as far as it knows, it's the center of the universe. It's kind of like people. To go with that, that's a very different way to compute than thinking I'm in charge of everything. I'm the central processor. Everybody just waits until I tell them what to do. As a result, we need a whole new best effort software stack because these things might crap out individually without the whole grid going down. So that's what we're trying to do. We've built hardware. We've got simulators of the hardware. Most of what we've been doing for the last several months has been in the simulation. The hardware still needs some work, and we're going to be getting back to that soon. But why make this whole effort? We've got computers. The reason I am motivated to do this is I am seriously concerned about the future of information technological society. Now, maybe we're all going to die of pandemics or the next fungal plague or whatever it is anyway, but assuming we managed to get past that, assuming we managed to hold some kind of actual organization that allows for innovation and that allows for liberty and bottom-up influences to persist. I'm concerned about the computer technology base that we have. Based on CPU and RAM, it's incredibly fragile, it's incredibly brittle, and it's essentially impossible to make secure. And we don't even want just security. What we want is loyalty. And it doesn't even make sense to say, how could a machine be loyal? And the reason it doesn't make sense is because our machines don't know us.  Yeah, but they're not our friends. They don't have our best interests at heart.  That's the goal. That's a pretty big goal. That's pretty ambitious. A whole new type of hardware, a whole new approach, a whole new software stack. When is it going to be here? When is it going to run Excel spreadsheets? And the answer is this is a research and development project. When is it coming closer than it was two weeks ago? And where this whole story just ended, last update, was we had taken this idea of a tectonic plate, a little solid block of atoms that we could customize to do what we want and said, well, what if we pop them out and spread them out so they had some empty space in between them, and we could put other things in there. Last time we made a crossbar switch. This time we made something else. My repeating goal in this is, you know, this is a crazy spatially distributed cellular automata new kind of computing architecture. Well, not that new. People have been studying cellular automata in various shapes and forms all the way back since the beginning. This, you know, in the details in the, with the engineering focus, yes, very different. The main difference is, oh, I'm cropped off here, paths to utility, that the goal is not to imitate life directly. That may be helpful to get something done, but that's not the top order purpose of it. The purpose is to figure out a way to do engineering on this sort of thing in a way that could actually be useful to society that we could build it, you know, future tile grids that would control systems that you might not be insane to have let them near you because they would be beholden to you. They would be your buddies.   That's what we're looking for. And the paths to utility this episode goes through closed box function optimization that used to be called black box function optimization, but now we're trying to find terms that are less colored or in less color oriented. So closed box versus open box in an open box function optimization, you're allowed to look at the details of the functions. Oh, this is a linear function. This is a quadratic function. Oh, I know what to do with this in the closed box function optimization. All you've got is where is it? You send points off to the function and you get back values to the search strategy and the search strategies job is to figure out what points to send to the to the function in order to get higher and higher values back separate from the search strategy. There's some kind of observer that decides when we're done good enough, or we haven't done good enough and we just have to give up. And that's what we're doing here. So, oh, dear, right. Stochastic iterated genetic hill climbing. Si, S-I-G-H. It's an algorithm for doing closed box function optimization. And it's the algorithm that I wrote my PhD dissertation on in the 1980s. You know, these days, people do such a great job, you know, doing, you know, Twitter threads and Instagram pictures and all kinds of live public posts about to explain their thesis research. And I'm just a little bit behind. The way Si works, it's a neural net. So it has a bunch of units, a bunch of decision units can be on or off that represent the value, the point that we're going to evaluate in the function. In this model, that's called the government. The idea is based on an election. We have a population of voters and the voters somehow vote on zero or one for each position in the government. And then when we have a complete government, that gets off to be evaluated by the black box function. And the goal is for the voters to figure out ways to elect governments that lead to success. Now, this in a lot of ways, it's very natural. It's very common. So we have these. Where is it? We have. Oh, yeah, I keep forgetting I'm live. So I'm supposed to be able to do this. It's a little bit backwards though. So I'm still learning. Right. So here's the government positions. And then down here is the population. The governments are all plus or minus one or zero. But the voters have three choices. They can support a particular set of candidates with a plus, they can oppose a particular set of candidates with a minus, or they can adopt state zero, meaning they're apathetic and I could give a crap. And in the learning algorithm works, if you support or oppose either way, the result of the black box function coming back will descend upon you.  If you pick something that turns out to produce a score that ends up with a negative reinforcement, then your weights go down. If you're apathetic, your weights don't change. And that's how it works. Is it a great amazing? Is it does it beat a world that all other approaches to close box function optimization? No, no, it doesn't. I mean, but it depends on how you count. The easiest thing to count is how many evaluations of the function does it take in order to actually find the best possible value or find a value that, you know, the observer is willing to judge as successful like that. But that's just one approach. And so what we've got now, what is new this week is, oh, and here's the actual rule. This is from the book from my dissertation, like that, you know, it's got these various phases, you know, so first you hold an election, which is you let all of the voters stay constant and they vote for what the government wants to be. And then at the end of that, you decide who won the election and now you have the reaction where the voters get to decide if they like the government or not. And then we have the consequences where we take the result of the government, we get it evaluated by the black box, the close box function and we decide how well we're doing. That's what that's what this is. I mean, it's pretty complicated. It's got all kinds of stuff going on.  It's got a foot. It's got the foot. That's the function under test. Let's break this down just a little bit just to get the idea so that we understand maybe what we saw at the beginning. So all of this started as the typical with these computations with a single seed. This is an SW, a seed weight matrix. And, you know, what happens is you put down a single one of these, the first time it gets an event assuming there's empty space around, it pops out into some initial configuration, initial date in a cellular automata, they usually call them a garden of Eden configuration because it didn't come from any previous state of the cellular automata. In the case of the movable feast machine, what we're doing, the concept of a garden of Eden state isn't as obvious because since there's a certain amount of randomness and computations don't happen the same way, the fact of a computation, a particular configuration being impossible to produce by the rules, it really is less likely to come up. So in any case, on the first event, this thing pops out to its initial configuration. And look at that, that's really complicated. One, two, three, that's what, eight, nine, nine atoms in the initial configuration. And each one of those is doing one of the things, something that's important for a thing. Well, let me use the mouse. Let me still do that, right? Yeah, here we are. So SO, that's the psi operator. That's the thing that's going to run the whole operation. The VV is the vector of voters that we saw along the bottom of the image. The PQ is the, it's a vector that's a vertical vector, the pole questions, the elected offices, whatever it happens to be. And these two WMs are going to be weight matrices. And the way these weight matrices work is they're inherently asymmetric. They're going from this to that or from this to that. And I've got versions which handle the various rotations. So this upper WM is the one that's coming out of the pole questions that's broadcasting the results of the election so that all the voters can see it. This one down here is broadcasting the result of a single voter's choices so all the government offices, the pole questions can see it. And the SG's are state gates. Now, one of the things I was really interested to try to do, but I just, you know, I just couldn't take the time. Well, I couldn't get it working. You know, the PSI algorithm is broken down into these phases. First you hold a vote, wait for it to be done. Then you have the reaction, wait for it to be done. Then you have consequences, wait for it to be done, and then vote again. But in this model, you know, it might be really kind of interesting to not bother to break those phases down quite so much. I haven't tried it yet. It's just one of those things, you know, hope that one day there'll be enough time to it. So given that we don't want to do that, we actually want to say, no, no, no, the voters should ignore everything that's happening until it's their turn to vote. Then and only then should we grab what they're thinking at that moment and have that be the vote. That's their moment in the polling booth. And that's what this SG is for. That's what this state gate is for. The PSI operator is going to trigger the state gate on the voter vector when it's time for them to do their thing. And we're going to, as quickly as we can, I mean, it has to propagate down the steps, capture everybody's vote, and then latch it and then keep it. And the state gate up here is the same thing except that's for deciding the result of the election like that. So the PSI operator triggers the state gates in turn to create the voting react vote react cycle. The EV over here is the evaluation thing. That's actually another state gate, although it's not colored quite the same way that the PSI operator uses when it's time to say, okay, what was the results? I have to actually pass this result off to the black box. Keep saying it. The closed box function to get a score. Now in a better implementation of this, the function to be optimized would really be more weight matrices, more things that would be evaluating what this system did to decide whether they like it or not. But for purposes of this demo, I cheat and the EVs, which we'll see stacking up in a second, they just fold all the bits down into a single little word and then pass it off to one individual atom which evaluates it. And then here's the key. How do you know if a value, a function value of 115 is good or 1012 is good or bad? Or, you know, how do you tell? The PSI algorithm is based on reinforcement comparison. The idea is we remember a running backwards average of all the function values we've seen. And if the one that we get now is better than the running backwards average, then we say, hey, you did something good. That's a positive reinforcement. If it's worse than the running backwards average, then we say that's punishment. Now, of course, no matter what it is, it's going to pull the backwards average in the direction that it goes a little bit. So with that approach, you know, we could just freeze up. You know, we could get a score of 1,000. Oh, that seems great. And now the reinforcement is zero, but that's okay. Everybody just says, let's keep doing the thing that gets 1,000. I'm good with it. There might never be any more searching. So the additional parameter in the PSI algorithm is called, I don't even remember what it is. Well, it's called delta, but it basically it's the ambition, it's the restlessness. So that instead of just comparing the backwards average to the current score and saying if it's exact match, the reinforcement is zero, we add in a little expectation. The value of the function needs to keep increasing a little bit or else the reinforcement eventually goes negative. So we can see it, and it does happen in the opening video that was going all over the place, that the election, the government freezes up and the same parties get elected over and over and over again. And in this particular case, the evaluation, the black box, the closed box function produces the same result over and over again. Now that will necessarily be true in general, but it's true here. And so eventually the reinforcement goes negative. And eventually the negative reinforcement starts to melt away the weight matrices until the voters start getting apathetic and they start flipping over to oppose things they supported or vice-versa and the whole system melts. So you get this interesting long term behavior, which certainly I could see behaviors like that in my own thinking of myself as a closed box function optimizer, trying to make something do something, like for example, trying to get code to work. And I could make different decisions about how much ambition I would have. So once I got something to work, I would be excited about it for a while but then, you know, it was boring. I wanted to do something cooler. So I tear it up. Psy just does that because of the reinforcement and the delta, the reinforcement comparison, that what we're really looking for is improvement, improvement by this much. And that if we get negative reinforcement, what that tends to do, the way it works through the algebra is it tends to make the weights in the matrices smaller, closer to zero whether they're positive or negative, which makes the system more random. And that's it. So the seed pops out into the initial configuration, the egg, which then grows. And did I mention RM? I don't know if I did.  We need to tell all the weights in both the networks from the voters to the government, from the government back to the voters what happened so that the weights can be updated. That's what the reinforcement matrix does. It carries the reinforcement out to the grid and that's the main thing that you see in the opening video, this kind of red wave sweeping out and then blue pulling back in. That's the reinforcement matrix distributing the results to the weight matrix and then coming back. Alright. And here's the whole thing. So we can see, right, we've got the psi operator. He's going through, he's a little state machine going in a loop. Here's the function under test. The last value that it evaluated was 17,920. The backwards average value was 15,220. So that's, we did better. So the last reinforcement was positive. In this case it's two and so on. And, you know, how well is it working? I'm not completely sure. Why don't we try it? We won't get to see it. Let's just try it for a minute or two before we run out of time. Let's see if I can get this to go. Alright, I think that's it.  And there we go. Let's get some Adam viewers here. Here's our foot and our psi operator so we can tell.  Right now it's hard to see because it's better when it's going fast because you see the snappier decisions. In the early part of the video we'll watch it once again to close out this thing and hopefully we'll see it with slightly clearer eyes. When the voters are making their decisions the vertical lines tend to change colors so there was a horizontal one going so that's the results of an election being distributed back and so forth. And now the psi operators in state four which means it's actually going off to evaluate the thing like that. Does it work? Well, what's the fuck? What's the function under test? In this particular case what it's trying to do again the psi construction, the nodes, the voters, the poll questions, the weight matrices have no idea of this. It's hidden down inside the foot. The way you improve the scores by having as many of the poll questions green as many set as possible except the number of them set needs to be a multiple of three. One other thing one other thing that in all of the basic things that happens in weight matrices if you just have every unit of every vector of this thing connected to every vector of this thing and they're going back and forth then they have no real orientation. If one of these beings wants to be on by default it's got no way to do it because all of its inputs are coming from the flexible the variable state on the other side. So in this particular case the very top question in the poll question is a true unit. It means the result is always green no matter what the vote is. And the same thing we should switch. It's really hard to tell. Well this is what it looks like just the element view without showing anything that depends on the actual specifics of the network but you know it's more fun to do it. So this column out here is the true unit and this row over here is the true unit. So when we're evaluating the score we chop that one off so we take all of these other ones green green red green green green green green so that's one two three four five six seven greens and one two three red like that so seven oh three three mod four seven is three mod four. So in fact it looks like it's optimized the function here. If it turned either of these any of these three on it would have more on which gets it some bonus but then it would no longer be equal to three mod four the count so it would pay a penalty and so on. Did the job. Yes.  It comes up all over the place and to have something that's reasonably general that makes very few assumptions. It doesn't know that you know positive that it should be expecting to reach a hundred or a thousand or whatever as far as you know it could be that minus ten thousand is the best possible score and the reinforcement comparison mechanism would automatically home in on that. Okay so that's it now the one thing that I did want to mention and then I will wrap up is you know with the psi operator sequencing it so that the entire voter vector goes and then the entire poll question vector goes it doesn't matter where you actually are on any given vector here but what I wanted to do was to let them go in in their own time so that the because you know when we distribute a reinforcement signal it arrives it emerges from the lower left corner and arrives at those parts of the weight matrices sooner and we do all of this extra work with all the sequencing so that in effect everybody gets a fair chance but what if we didn't do that? What if we put the things that we wanted to be fast like reflexes, spinal cord stuff like that if we arrange for that stuff to be represented near the head near the action and we could have fast learning loops going between you know the few key voters and the few key election positions and then slower and more general and more vague stuff and if the reinforcement gets a little bit muddy out there because you know it's some combination of the previous election and the current election well maybe that'll be helpful maybe that'll allow those guys to pick up the more general bigger landscape features rather than getting hung up about every last little point on every little fast time scale that would be for the future. Okay so we'll let this stop this guy alright. So that's it so all of this the reason that we're happening live and you know we've got 10 turn viewers look at all these folks thank you so much for coming I haven't been able to look at the chat while I've been doing this but I will stick around I guess you know after it works I'm not sure what happens when I end the stream I really haven't ended the stream before. All of this possible because I finally broke down and installed Ubuntu 20.04 on the workstation that we're seeing all this with and played around with OBS Open Broadcast Studio which is super cool it turned out that it didn't do Max Green mentioned a few updates ago out of the box and it turned out to be harder than I expected to do Max Green but I came up with an amazingly disgusting hack which is what we are using and it actually works not too terribly the screen is kind of fuzzy and that's my biggest concern about it that's not entirely because of my hack although it may be partly because of the hack so you know yes everybody bugging me to update you know you were right thank you everybody telling me like Andrew to try OBS yes you were right and you know if this all works out if I get better at this you know I would like to be using I would like to be using this more often for more stuff for example I am participating in a zoom workshop the rest of this week starting tomorrow and I may use this as well the SFI Santa Fe Institute Workshop on the Frontiers of Evolutionary Computing next week I've got one as well it just keeps coming the next update will be on August 3rd and thank you all folks for coming tell you what I'm just going to rerun the opener and catch up and try to read these comments for the last minute or two but anyway where are we here thanks folks this was fun so you see the red stuff going forward and back that's the reinforcement matrix right now the colors the blues the greens that means the weights are big it's using a rainbow display and that's because the foot is basically locked oh and it just melted and so you see the light the colors have gone back to more green which is the range of zero weights and now they're actually it looks like they're starting to grow again and that's exactly the kind of thing that you get with SA you get this excitement of convergence this is the guy for us bam bam bam look at that look at all those reds and blues those are big positive weight and I think it's going to end yeah it's going to end alright I'm going to end the stream here because I'm jittering hope to see everybody next time


Welcome back to our lecture series, SMATH 3130, Modern Geometries for Students at Southern Utah University. As usual, I'll be a professor today, Dr. Andrew Misildine. In the previous lecture, lecture 14, of course, we introduced the congruent axioms relative to a line segment, and then we defined the idea of a congruent geometry one, which is an order geometry plus the six axioms of congruence. We mentioned the first three and I promised you that in the next lecture, which of course is now lecture 15, that we would introduce the notion, well, the congruence axioms for angles. The last three are very similar to the first three. As a reminder, we defined, well, I shouldn't say we defined, we introduced an undefined term for congruence of line segments, for which then we got segment translation, transitivity of segment congruence, and we had segment addition. In this video, we're going to introduce the idea of congruence between angles. So if we have two angles, ABC and DEF, we can say that two angles are congruent. It is an undefined term. And again, it's going to be a homonym to we talk about congruence of line segments. We're not going to say that an angle is congruent to a line segment. A segment can be congruent to another segment. An angle can be congruent to another angle. They are different things, but they are, of course, related. We will use the same symbol, of course, to represent congruence. We say angle ABC is congruent to DEF, and we'll use this symbol that we see here on the screen. All right? So with this notion of congruence of segments and congruence of angles, we can now define what it means for two triangles to be congruent, okay? So recall that a triangle is going to be, the triangle ABC is the intersection of the three angles, ABC, BCA, and CAB. I hope I listed all those correctly there. But a triangle, it's the intersection of the three angles associated to it. So suppose we have two triangles, triangle ABC and triangle A prime, B prime, C prime. So then we're going to say that triangles ABC and A prime, B prime, C prime are congruent if the line segment AB is congruent to A prime, B prime. The line segment BC is congruent to B prime, C prime. The line segment AC is congruent to A prime, C prime. The angle ABC is congruent to A prime, B prime, C prime. The angle BCA is congruent to angle B prime, C prime, A prime. And lastly, that the angle CAB is congruent to the angle C prime, A prime, B prime. So we say that two triangles are congruent to each other if they're three side, the line segments that form its three sides are congruent and the three angles are congruent, okay? So now we're ready to introduce the congruence axioms, the remaining three. So C4, C5, C6, due to Hilbert's axioms of Euclidean geometry. The first couple, the first two are actually gonna be very, very similar to what we saw before. So we're gonna take axiom C4 to be angle translation. It's gonna be similar to segment translation and this is how it's gonna go. Given an angle ABC and given a ray B prime, A prime, then there exists a unique ray B prime, C prime on each side of the line, A prime, B prime, such that the angle ABC is congruent to the angle A prime, B prime, C prime. In particular, on the ray BA and on the side containing the point C, that unique ray coincides with BC. So all right, there's a lot to unravel here. So we have some angle ABC. So imagine we have something like this. Draw in some arrows because these are rays. So we have some point A. B is the vertex of this thing. C is some other point. So the angle ABC is given here. And so then we have some ray B prime A. So we might get something like the following. There's some ray A prime, B prime, like so. So the ray emanates from B prime. Oh, excuse me, this is supposed to be the, nope, that was right, B prime, A prime. So then we're given the angle we're given a ray segment or angle translation means that we can copy this angle down onto this ray that's below. So there exists some ray, some point, I should say. Well, no, there's some ray B prime, C prime. So the ray emanates from B prime as well. There's some point C prime right here. And so then we're gonna get that this angle is congruent to that one. ABC is congruent to A prime, B prime, C prime, okay? And so just like segment translation, angle translation has this uniqueness statement that if you translate an angle onto itself, the congruence in that situation actually has to be equality, right? So if you take, if we take the angle ABC and you translate it onto the ray AB, then the ray that's guaranteed to give you the congruent angle must have been BC, like so. Now with, unlike a segment translation, angle translation actually guarantees the angle can be translated in two different places because after all, when you have the ray B prime A, this ray could, of course, be extended to a line and we know from order geometry that there are two sides of the line. There's this side and that side. So when it comes to angle translation, we can actually translate onto either side of the line. It doesn't really matter. So we get this angle A prime, B prime, C prime, or this angle A prime, B prime, C double prime, they're both gonna be congruent to the original angle ABC. So when you work with the angle translation, you do have to, of course, pick which side of the line you're doing and on each side, there'll be a unique ray that gives you a congruent angle. And of course, when you copy it back onto yourself, that has to be the exact same thing, the exact same rays. You get equality in that situation, all right? So angle translation sounds a lot like segment translation, but we have to change the appropriate parts so that it's compatible with angles as opposed to segments. Axiom C5, which we will call transitivity of angle congruence, it sounds a lot like transitivity of segment congruence. We get that if the angle ABC is congruent to the angle A prime, B prime, C prime, and the angle A prime, B prime, C prime is congruent to the angle A double prime, B double prime, C double prime, then we can conclude that the angle ABC is congruent to the angle A double prime, B double prime, and C double prime, like so. Now, if we were just to stop right here for one moment, I'm not gonna even introduce the third axiom, the sixth axiom, I should say, just quite yet. We will do that, of course, in a moment. But let me scroll up so we can see the angle translation. Angle translation is essentially the same axiom but for angles as opposed to segments. And in particular, we have this uniqueness statement, right? This ray is gonna be unique, there's only one of them. And of course, if you translate onto yourself, you get equality. So that's built into the cake there, we have transitivity here. Now, this uniqueness statement is very, very important because when we talked about segment congruence, we used the uniqueness statement of segment translation to argue and prove that the relation of segment congruence is a reflexive, a reflexive relation. Because angle translation likewise has that uniqueness statement, the analogous uniqueness statement, we can infer that by the exact same proof that angle congruence is likewise gonna be a reflexive relation. By axioms, we have that it's transitive. Is it symmetric? Think about this, when we introduced the segment congruence with its three axioms, we then proved as a proposition that segment congruence is actually a symmetric relationship. And how do we do that? Well, I'm not gonna go through all of the arguments here but basically argument came down to we used segment translation, then we used transitivity of segment congruence and then we used the uniqueness of segment translation. So we use segment translation again to argue that segment congruence is a symmetric relationship. And since you're reflexive, symmetric and transitive, this then proves that segment congruence is an equivalence relation. I am gonna leave it as an exercise to the viewer here to prove that angle congruence is likewise an equivalence relation because the uniqueness statement of angle translation will give us angle reflexivity. Transitivity, of course, falls from the axiom and then the proof of angle symmetry with regard to congruence will come about from using angle translation, right? You take one of the angles translated to the other, use transitivity there and then you use the uniqueness to get that you started off with the same angle. So without any further proof, I can actually say that angle congruence is an equivalence relation. And this is one of the powers of the axiomatic method because angle congruence and segment congruence essentially have the same axioms, the same proof applies and we get an equivalence relation on angle congruence, okay? The last of the congruence axioms, axiom C6, it's gonna be a little bit different. If you recall for segment congruence, our last axiom was segment addition allowed us to unite two segments together and guarantee statements of congruence. It would make sense to have an analogous statement for angle congruence here, like a so-called angle addition for which we will have angle addition as a theorem later on. We don't wanna take it as its axiom because if we left it alone, if we took angle addition as the axiom, then we have this problem. Yeah, we can develop segment congruence on one side. We can develop angle congruence on a different side but how do they mesh together? How do they interact with one another? After all, the whole point of segment addition was to see how segment congruence interacts with betweenness of points. We have to make a connection to this new undefined term of congruence with the old undefined terms of incidence and betweenness. So in particular, we need some way of connecting angle congruence to segment congruence. And so instead of taking angle addition as an axiom, we'll prove it as a theorem and instead we're gonna take as our axiom, the side angle, side axiom, which this is gonna be a triangle congruent statement. So imagine we have two triangles, ABC and A prime, B prime, C prime. So we have these two triangles here and I'm gonna scooch things up a little bit so we can try to draw a picture to give some illustration what's going on here. So we have two triangles. Here's one triangle and I'll label it. So this is A, B and C. And then we have some other triangle. Giving a little bit more space here. We have some other triangle, maybe something like this. And so we'll call this one A prime, this one B prime and this one C prime. So we have these two triangles, these six points here. We're gonna assume that the side of the segment AB is congruent to the segment A prime, B prime. We're gonna assume that the angle ABC is congruent to the angle A prime, B prime, C prime. And we're gonna assume that the segment BC is congruent to B prime, C prime. And this is where it gets the name side angle side, often denoted AS, excuse me, SAS for short, side angle side, because we have this side that's congruent, the angle's congruent and then the side here. And in particular, the angle is between the two sides that's very important. Because if we had like some angle side side or something like that, that gets a little bit more complicated. We'll talk about that some other time. But the side angle side axiom then says that if we have this congruent, side angle side congruence between the triangles, then in fact, the triangles are actually congruent to each other. And so remember our definition of congruence of triangles. If the triangles are congruent, that means all of their sides must be congruent, right? So the other side, we don't know anything about AC and A prime, C prime. If the triangles were congruent, then we can infer that those sides are congruent. Likewise, the angles, the angle C would have to be congruent to angle C prime and angle A would have to be congruent to A prime, right? So these red marks we see right here, if we know those are congruent, then we can assume the other parts are congruent as well. And that's the power of these triangle congruences. If we know some of the parts are congruent, then we can know the other parts are congruent. And you're gonna see us because the side angle side and its consequences, many of our geometric proofs and congruence geometry will be things like, oh, we're gonna prove that these two triangles are congruent to each other because of some side angle, side condition or something else.  We're gonna use that observation all the time. And so that's a very, very powerful. The side angle side axiom is very, very powerful. We will approve angle addition in the future, not in this video because side angle side is actually more powerful and in particular it connects together congruence of segments and congruence of angles. Because how are they related? Side segment congruence and angle congruence? Well, that happens from, of course, triangle congruence, which the side angle side axiom offers us.


In 2020 alone, 384.3 billion shillings was laundered through the Kenyan economy. These illicit financial flows are caused by corruption, illegally exploiting Kenya's natural resources, trade misinvoicing and tax evasion of multinational companies. A world-bunked study on corruption showed that the most common method to hide ill-gotten wealth was through the use of companies whose owners are unknown. Criminals use anonymous companies to hide their money, mask their identity and transfer their proceeds out of the country. To address this, the African Union and United Nations recommended that African countries create beneficial ownership registries to stop this exodus of money. What is beneficial ownership? It is identifying the real individuals that own and control the company. Why is beneficial ownership transparency important for Kenya? Beneficial ownership transparency is a key deterrent to corruption, tax evasion and money laundering. If you consider some of the major corruption cases that we have witnessed in Kenya, such as the 10.5 billion shilling National Youth Service scandal in 2015, you'll find that criminals took advantage of lack of transparency in beneficial ownership and hid their identities behind companies and legal entities. Does Kenya have a law on beneficial ownership? In 2017, Kenya passed laws requiring companies to disclose the identity of the individuals that truly own and control them. By the 31st of July, all companies have to submit beneficial ownership information. Companies that fail to do this risk a fine of 500,000 Kenya shillings. This law will provide Kenya with resources needed to tackle illicit financial flows and aid in asset recovery. But many loopholes still exist. The current laws are not enforced against trusts and foreign companies. Neither is this information accessible to the public and the registrar of companies does not check whether the information provided is truthful. These shortcomings should be rectified. Only through strong beneficial ownership laws can we prevent companies from abusing the financial system in Kenya.


Hi everyone, Joe for Jasper's Case Breaks.com hump day. Happy Wednesday. Happy new release day. Happy contenders basketball day We're coming at you with six box half case break pick your team number four This sold out before three just in case you're keeping track First to fill first to break as always big. Thanks to this group here and pick your team for Brian grabbing the last four teams quadruple a last spot mojo. That's why his little stars next to his name they say that uh they say that um Seventy percent of time last ball mojo hits a hundred percent of time new configuration here in contenders basketball as well We'll show you in just a mo Then there's still two boxes stuck in here and Michael have a good. I'll see you tomorrow, man All right, so I made a bit of a mess Here so we'll just one two three four five six And six there we go So we're gonna roll the die We'll go one two three for the left side and four five six for the right side It's gonna be one Do that side this side will save for pick your team Three remember four sold out before three. So we'll number those boxes number three All right, and that just requires a filler and we can get that knocked out All right, so they reconfigured it's only four packs per box now eight cards per pack so two autographs per box on average We're looking for You know the ultra license and to and permit to dominate inserts. We're looking for Guys like that right there Good luck. I like this four-card configuration here. That's our bingo card. We got Jalen Duren Rookie oh Ask me an autograph. They got superstar die cuts That dice and Daniels and here's our autograph. We got the finals ticket Andrew Nemhard 30 out of 49 Rookie auto for the Pacers that's gonna be for Adam The Pacers Let's see if we can find his teammate. I guess all the all the base cards kind of have that pattern pretty cool And then out of 249 We've got a wild cab Carl Anthony Towns It's kind of a cool cool look here. I'm digging it and we have Contenders autographs 64 out of 99 OB Toppin I think he has a he has a brother right that probably gonna make it into the NBA possibly Nick's that's gonna go to Brian last while mojo Carnotty towns goes to Michael and T wolves We've got a Christian wood to 75 for Dallas. That'll be for incu and that's our first box I'm liking this four-pack format here. Let's keep going here. We've got it's a Chet Holm room rookie ticket and our autograph is Playoff ticket Tari Eason 24 out of 99 rookie autograph for The Rockets Matthew. Unfortunately a little bit of a ding right there Tari Easton it's on card was mishandling that card there You got to 249 Devin the cell John Marant die-cut Brian has the spurs and then a Chet Holm room rookie card goes to Edward an okc Next auto is Is a rookie ticket autograph? Ryan Rollins That's sort of optic design there Yeah, maybe that's why they're thinning out the settler. Yeah, I wouldn't mind all the contender sets being thinned out a little bit Got Yanis to 75 for the bucks that'll be for Francis Insert there. All right Photography all right other box coming down the stretch right in the The Basketball season not too many games left. I think there are some games in progress We've got at the end of the first bucks are up on the bulls 28 21 Start of the second Celtics up 33 32 on the Raptors start of the second Hawks Are hosting the Wizards Wizards up 34 33 Almost the end of the first half Pacers Two points behind the Knicks 67 65 at halftime net you're up on the piston 74 57 And big big game For my Lakers Lakers Clippers tonight. That's a ESPN game. All right 239 out of 249 That's a Jamal Murray for Denver And we've got a David Roddy rookie ticket autograph Dong Hyun for the Gris and Andrew has the Nuggets you'll get that Jamal Murray A lot of expectations for the Nuggets this year to 199. That's Jason Tatum for Stephen Olsen and the C's and we've got a Permit to dominate Obaji O'Shy For the Utah Jazz Jake Joe for the Jazz He's a pretty cool You now have the permits dominate as well Jake and the autograph is gonna be for Denver Christian Braun that Optic material rookie ticket autograph going to Andrew and the Denver Nuggets All right halfway through this half case break. This is pick your team for Sold out before three first fill first break your team three the other half is in the store right now I got Shaden Sharp Jason Tatum die-cut and a Milwaukee buck Marjan Boscham Going to Francis in the Bucks Bojan Bogdanovic to 249 for the Pistons It's gonna be for Nicholas in Detroit and we got a Jabari Walker rookie ticket autograph for Portland. That's gonna go to Jaik and the trailblazers Do you want to Murray to 75? That'll go to the ATL Brian Watford Two boxes to go Frans Wagner to 49. Let's see who can find his teammate in here somewhere. There's Max Christie. Nice rookie ticket autograph For my Lakers who's got my Lakers that's for Andrew Martin. There you go Andrew. It's got a little upside Montress his evolution in the league Rob has the magic gets the Wagner Devon Macel to 199 for the Spurs. That's gonna go to Brian And we've got a license to dominate Anthony Davis nice. He does have a license to dominate. He's got a dominate tonight You got a Christian Brown for Denver. It's for Andrew Martin Andrew also has a license to dominate You can show this around town Andrew You know when the police pulls you over when you're dominating you're like, oh, excuse me. I've got this. I'm clear. Oh Sorry, sir. We didn't realize you had a license to dominate Mr. Davis, and you'll be okay. Got a Trey young superstar die cut as well Final box coming up only a matter of time before LeBron trades him. I think I think even Even the Lakers front office would not let LeBron get that transaction done. I don't know What could you really get for an injury prone big man and Mike Connelly to 249 for the jazz That will be for Jai Steph Curry superstar die cut and we've got a Dalen Terry rookie ticket autograph for doubles. That's gonna go to Jason in Chicago When a redemption coming up any guesses on that redemption for bragging rights 199 out of 199. Oh You meant Max Chris. Yeah, I mean maybe Max Christie could be traded. I don't know what you get for a second round pick That's a mug side though. Here's Paul George first round ticket card to 199 for Andrew and the Clippers Good luck. We have a rookie season ticket Autograph of B B l Blake Blake Wesley Old Blake Wesley Blake Wesley is Is he 25th overall pick? for the Spurs That'll go to Brian Watford and the San Antonio Spurs And there you have it ladies and gentlemen And this contenders basketball pretty quick Now that it's only a four-pack break. We got a couple licensed to dominates Got some nice on-card autographs some fun parallels Some nice stuff Next half in the store right now. Jasper's case breaks calm Let's fill up the filler you got a chance to win a box in that filler as well box this contenders or a team So thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with us. I'll see you next time for the next half. Bye. Bye