First, we're going to kick it off with a keynote from HP. And to speak to us this morning, we have Biri Singh, who is the Senior Vice President of Converged Cloud and the GM of HP Cloud Services. So Biri Singh. Thank you, John. Appreciate it. Thanks so much. Good morning. How are you all doing? Great. Thanks for taking the time out and joining us here. Before I get started, actually, I think we all owe a round of applause to Jonathan and the OpenStack Foundation. They've done an admirable task in the last few months, some great progress. Setting up things like this is never easy. You've got to balance true community. To me, it's all about transparency. And I think they've done a fantastic job. So I want to thank Jonathan and the Foundation's efforts. We've got a lot, learning a lot, lots more work to do. But I think it's off to a fantastic start. So again, thank you. I'm going to spend some time with you this morning on talking a little bit about how HP is thinking about the cloud space, give you an update on what we've been up to, but try to frame it around what we think are the challenges around really getting to a true open, scalable, interoperable cloud, and an ecosystem around it for the enterprise. And by that, I mean the enterprise production workload. And so I want to talk a little bit about what we think about it, what we're learning. We've been active here now for a couple of years and hope to share with you some insights. And we'll go from there. So I've shared this slide before. The way I want to talk about this is we've all experienced this. We're living this real time. The notion of mobile and social, big data, analytics, all coming together with the cloud, to me, is an obvious thing. But I think it's one of the most disruptive, if not the disruptive phenomena over the last 40 years. And as long as I've been involved in IT, which is a good chunk of those years, it's definitely something I think is the most disruptive piece. So how do these things come together? And the way we've thought about it is really trying to lay it out in these four, actually five points. So the device, the front end, is how we interact with all of the information. Our identities, our lives at home as consumers, as well as increasingly at work, are all essentially in the cloud. So a safe identity with all of our information accessed through the cloud. And the cloud becomes the back end. But really what's happening now, and we've noticed this largely through the change in our experiences in the social media, social network side, is we're not interacting with this information and our devices, laptops, smartphones, what have you, the endpoints, many devices per individual. And we're really starting to experience a very different type of interaction, and we're getting things done. In the old legacy traditional view, you had a view that systems of record were the capture control points. And typical, for example, ERP systems were systems of record. They were control points. They have been control points. Now what's actually happening is through bite-sized applications and services accessible through literally anywhere, we're starting to move towards more a system of experiences.  The devices now become a get it done device. And so many devices for all of us, cloud becomes the back end, lightweight interactions between the devices, and not just machine, but also the machine-to-machine element of it generates a huge amount of data. And so analytics to make sense of it all. And then the last point I'm going to come back to a little bit later is this whole idea of taking to bring your own device phenomena, which has been the last three, four years, now unleashed itself onto the enterprise, and it's a whole new style of IT that's got to take it on. Getting that whole phenomena together and tying it securely in the enterprise is something that is critical not just for mobile and how that will unfold, but also true production workloads from the cloud actually being part of an everyday experience. It's boring after a while to just deal with email or some lightweight apps. You actually got to work in a way that you actually get things done in the work environment as well. So that's how we framed it. Fairly obvious stuff, but for us it was a good guidepost to say we've got to look at big trends and see how all this comes together and how does this shape sort of HP's point of view. And then we think some implications for what we're all trying to work on, which is to build a truly open ecosystem of a world-class sort of cloud platform. So I think it starts with a concept in terms of getting to the enterprise, this idea of hybrid delivery. And the way I want to frame this is we all talk about hybrid clouds. I for one don't like the term hybrid cloud. We don't use it. We think it's better to sort of think about it as hybrid delivery. Customers have hybrid environments, have hybrid clouds. As an IT vendor, it's our job to actually manage and deliver a set of solutions, cloud solutions across different environments. So the way we frame it is there's sort of the traditional, virtualized environment, private clouds, public clouds, and this idea of sort of managed or hosted clouds in between where essentially it's a CAPEX, two OPEX transition as far as the customer says they say, I don't want to sort of set up my own private cloud. I'd like someone to have it managed for me. So against that backdrop, delivering a set of services or a set of experiences for customers that essentially want to build their cloud environments, infrastructure level, application level, data, big data analytics level, as well as just consume out over the internet or out over your dedicated cloud environment, you got to sort of balance the needs of that. So hybrid delivery, what we've been focused on is the ability to be able to stand up, not just private cloud environments, public cloud environments, and then run them for on behalf of our customers, but also do it in a common shared way. So increasingly, there's a need not just to be able to deliver across this, but be able to kind of deliver, quote unquote, one stack across these environments. And that's a key part of what we think is going to drive adoption going forward. Let me talk a little bit about the public cloud space. It's been a very active space. If you look at it, certainly startups and developers around startups, certainly SMBs have been quite well served. There's some major players in the space. And the way that, I think that market is, if you actually look at the startup world, I would say 80% penetration has occurred. Most series B startups and above are essentially running their infrastructure for the most part in AWS, right? And I think that whole market, the way it's been defined really caters to the notion of sort of startups, media workloads. There's a lot of sandbox IT going on, but we're not seeing heavy scale production workloads out there yet at scale. And there's been lots of talk. There's been obviously lots of active conversations about what that means and what does that look like. Now, if you look at the startup and you look at the SMB space, there's a certain amount of spend there. But if you actually look at enterprise production workloads, it's probably 10, 20 times that spend. So if you actually do the math, we're talking about a very sizable opportunity. And really a lot of those dollars have essentially been parked. If you think about infrastructure spend post Y2K, there was a freeze in 2003. There was another freeze in 2007. We're going through yet another one in the last year. And there's been an enormous amount of backlog built up. Core infrastructure upgrade, core application transformation, traditional apps, and a bunch of new apps.  And I call distracted spend dealing with mobility. But core infrastructure spending, core transformation of data centers, next generation data center, cloud enabling data centers, cloudifying your infrastructure, your application level, your database, your sort of analytics layers are still a work in progress. And our contention is there's still many, many dollars essentially sitting on the sidelines waiting and watching to see what sort of happens. So there's a lot of interest in our work here. When I say our, I'm talking about our open stack community and what we're trying to get done. And I think it's critical. The next phase of this for us has to be how do we sort of make it real, right? There's been a lot of chat. There's been a lot of good ideas, lots of framing. We all as vendors have our own parallel universe of presenting cloud frameworks. But at the end of the day, it's now about getting to production workloads. So I think it's super important to think about what's happening in the public space. There's been a lot of adoption and sort of classic sort of new, new mobile web 2.0. All of the new cool things are essentially moving to cloud environments. They'll be developed with tools in the cloud in PaaS environments. They'll be running in a cloud environment over time in a trusted cloud environment. The question is how do you now tie that back to the traditional workloads that are sitting there. So that brings me to a point about talking about how we see cloud workloads. And again, this is reasonably well understood, well out there, but we've sort of broken it out and we think of traditional workloads, ultimately, that have been typically under the virtualized environments. You get to 70, 80% of a virtualized environment. You're managing clusters of VMs very different from setting up distributed cloud apps or services. You now have to deal with things like availability zones and a different networking model and a different sort of distributed model. Your apps actually have to be designed for failure. Developers have to think about designing an application or set of services around an infrastructure that'll be up or down. And that's been something that's sort of taken hold of the mobile space and a lot of the consumer side, a lot of the sort of web 2.0 space, but it's critical that we can lead as an infrastructure and a platform and a cloud OS community that it's critical that we be able to tie these things together. So a big part of our focus is what are the requirements that bring workloads reliably to run on a cloud environment? And not just public cloud, it really has to be a public, private cloud. Again, hybrid delivery, the CIO of the enterprise is really interested in making sure that they can consume these services across all delivery models, right? So if you look at workloads, they've typically been web 2.0, mobile, cloud, centric workloads, easy adoption. They've sort of gotten out there.  The DevTest model has been out there. It's well understood, but now how do we move it from DevTest to production? There's all kinds of storage solutions out there. I think there's a ton of innovation going on in terms of the use cases, as well as all levels of infrastructure and innovation at the infrastructure and hardware and basic storage IP, phenomenal work going on as we speak. But then once you start getting into sort of these apps that are built for sort of reliability and are built on a certain infrastructure assumption, how do you now plan that and marry that view along both a private and a public cloud view? A lot of customers we've talked to have given us a point of view that say, hey, we want the web scale of a public cloud environment. We want an open stack like environment, but we also want all of the enterprise quality of service elements, security, performance, reliability, DR on and on. So how do you sort of marry that too? So we've tried to spend our time really figuring that out. And we've launched the HP public cloud. This past May, it's been in public beta now. We're launching several services and we're literally trying to learn as much as we can as we assemble sort of a common point of view for how do you bring private and public together? So against that backdrop, this view that cloud workloads have to now be running across really multiple delivery points. My view is SLAs and orchestration are kind of the two things that really matter. And what customers really want is an integrated experience around management and this notion of enterprise grade quality of service. So what do we mean by enterprise grade quality of service? An SLA that you can stand up and it's real. It's got real teeth. Customer service goes without saying, it's sort of a default and lots of best practices there. This notion of a secure cloud is really important. And I think getting that point across to a CIO and a chief security officer is there's a lot of work to be done there. There's not that many IT vendors that have been able to lay that out in a reasonable way. We're certainly trying. We rolled out what we think is a fairly aggressive SLA. You can go check it out at hbcloud.com. We think it's one of the more progressive SLAs in the environment. But I think the idea of standing up and delivering quality service is one thing. The idea of orchestration is, I think, yet another. And when I say orchestration, I mean orchestration with a big O. Meaning you have to deal with setting up service provisioning, cataloging, and enabling and deploying bare metal, but also above bare metal VMs and complete lifecycle management of VMs. But above that, a set of application level services at the platform level as well. So how do you, when a developer, whether at a startup or an SMB or an enterprise, is writing an app, she or he only cares about that runtime, right? And the database that's tied to it. Oh, that's what they should be thinking about. They shouldn't have to worry about auto scale or load balancing or identity or security or a set of services they want to provision to. So being able to sort of tie those together elegantly and offer that as an integrated view, not just for the developer, but in the enterprise for the IT ops side of the house. This sort of parallel sibling organization that's got to manage all the infrastructure that the CIO counts on for control points as they're seeing a whole bunch of sort of loss of control out to sort of line of business and application owners. The IT ops folks are critically involved as part of this equation. So delivering orchestration across that, I think, is vital. And I think one of the challenges we have to take up, and certainly HPs, we're spending a lot of time trying to figure it out and get it right, is how do we drive this view together? How do you drive reliability and predictability with an SLA and how do you tie it together with an orchestration layer that ultimately gives you what we call a true cloud management points of view? Now if you look at this conference here, we've had some great announces through some of our partners and some of the companies here. There's been some cool things around networking, some great alternatives around networking were announced. There was, I think, some good stuff at the platform level. There's a great compute piece that added on to one of the announces I saw. So I think there's a lot of work being done, but at the end of the day, the real measure is ultimately production workloads and how we're doing against that. And that's, I think, a key part of it. So my one challenge to all of us, and certainly HP's thinking about this, is how do we get real about this and how do we sort of focus on really production, true web scale grade services on a global level? And then what's sort of the environment in the ecosystem to go drive that? So that's my point in terms of orchestration. So when you think about design points across the board, web 2.0, all the way out to true enterprise, traditional legacy environments, I think orchestration and SLAs and tying those together is something companies have to figure out. And certainly we're spending a lot of our time figuring that part of it out. And over time, as I said, there will be a common cloud OS or platform model emerging. I think that is our challenge. I think that is the open stack opportunity, right? And this idea that a common stack, a common architecture, can now meet the needs of a multiple delivery model on a global basis at web scale and enterprise grade quality of service, I think is the opportunity. And that, by the way, folks, is hundreds of billions of dollars of spend, not six billion or 10 billion, which is where I think the current public cloud market is, for example, best case, right? So you've got to think about it in terms of this is now about dealing with global companies, with global needs, and over the next 10 years, we're going to see a CAPEX to OPEX shift. We will finish out our IT careers witnessing the change of a CAPEX to OPEX world, right? And it's going to be driven by a set of adoptions that we hopefully get to be part of. So I wanted to frame how we've been thinking about it. Spend a few quick minutes with it, and this is sort of our, you know, what are we doing in the community and how are we doing? So we picked up the flag with open stack last June. So 15 months later, we've been fairly active, we're learning a lot, and HP's had a fairly proud tradition dealing with open source. One thing I want to point out here is over the last six, seven months, we've gotten very active. We're going to be putting out some news around Folsom and our work there soon, so stay tuned for that. But I just want to point out, make sure everyone's clear, we are very aggressive and I think progressive for a company of our size in terms of being involved with open stack. There's, you know, despite sort of a lot of talk, we are actually actively promoting and getting lots of sort of contribution back into the community. And I challenge anyone to actually go look up the facts. Looking up facts tends to be trendy right about now, but this one really matters, and it's again transparency, it's transparency. So please go check it out and I'd invite you all to actually go look at it, it sort of speaks for itself. We've been very active, again, it goes back to the points of what I think is all about production workloads and our work here sort of really reflects that point of view. We've been particularly involved with getting open stack, as I'd say, at an enterprise grade credibility point of view and I've been able to work with the foundation and being able to set it up. Again, I think kudos to the entire folks, just not just sort of the foundation people, but all of the companies and all of the individual folks involved with it. I think it's critical that we have governance and transparency go hand in hand and it's great to see sort of the iterative process of it. So we've been pretty active there. We continue to sort of do a lot of work at the sort of nuts and bolts level with the community. We're doing a lot of work for example with the CI and the whole sort of deployment process of it. We've got fair amount of work there. A big part of our effort here for the next chapter is around this idea of bundling SLAs and orchestration and making it real. And for HP OpenStack is a key part of that. It's not just about sort of a compute or a storage infrastructure view, it's about a complete stack. And HP OpenStack, it's not just about OpenStack, we've been involved with open source for a while. All of these projects are actively part of the HP cloud. They're an active ingredient of it. So it's not just about HP IP, but it's about actually tying these things together and creating a more compelling iterative view and getting it to be in an enterprise great experience is what we're after. And one of the examples here, we've been very active with the notion of deployment and automation and how do you drive automation. I tell people about the HP experience on operating cloud services at scale for a company of our size that's been typically a hardware infrastructure player, running operating web services at scale and learning that experience is completely new, has been new. It's quite a learning curve, a steep learning curve. But one thing we've sort of figured out and sort of I think are investing a lot of time in is the whole idea around sort of the deployment and automation life cycle and how do we get better at that. So I'm gonna close with just a couple of quick points. The converge cloud strategy for HP really speaks to what we talked about. So last spring, this past spring we announced this as core strategy, it's really a framework. HP sort of coined the term converge infrastructure and what it really was a few years ago was the basic hypothesis that said tie server storage networking together, make it sort of next generation data center with a common backplane and deliver that. Well, since we did that, most of the industry is sort of taken to that. Converge infrastructure is now sort of a default view. So at one level beyond all the marketing hype, converge cloud is basically a similar design point. It's the view that says hybrid delivery of clouds are going to sort of center around two, three core models. How do you deliver private, public and managed clouds? The business models around them are gonna be different but some core things have to be common. This notion of a common platform of a shared level of SLAs, a shared level of architecture that can reinforce the notion of orchestration, management, security, provisioning is vital. So really converge cloud is really an HP term. It's an umbrella strategy. What we've also done, I've been at HP about a year and a half and in that time we've actually consolidated all of the different various cloud efforts under one umbrella converge cloud business. So we've taken all of our R&D and pulled it together. We've now sort of got a common look and feel and the idea is we wanna essentially build this around four architectural elements and the open stack element is the core piece at the foundation level. So our notion of converge infrastructure as a service really speaks to the idea of tying a common set of compute, storage, networking, infrastructure bindings and hardening that as a curation or a distribution of everything we do is make it a fundamental piece of sort of HP hardware and make it referenceable, make it sort of credible from day one. And then on top of that, build out a management secure layer. On top of that, build out an analytics and a structured unstructured point of view and then finally wrapper it with a common look and feel not just the notion of sort of one UI but really a set of experiences that give customers across the world a common look and feel to accessing the HP clouds whether it's private, public or managed. So that's really what the converge cloud view is. So and what the team that's largely involved with OpenStack has been the public cloud team which is a good chunk of folks here and our public cloud team by the way is where we're hiring and for those of you interested please check out our booth. We've got lots of cool things we're working on. So let me share with you in a couple of minutes here what we're actually doing. So for HP cloud, our idea of the cloud is not just to deliver infrastructure, it's to deliver the full stack. So we're actually building out a complete platform stack and with by platform it's not just developer tools as in Paz, for enterprises you need IT ops tools as well. So there's a set of tooling and services we've got to build for developers, for IT ops folks with which they can build and deploy workloads. For HP our goal is very simple. Running as many production grade workloads with an SLA at as high a utilization as possible is our business model. So with that we've got to attract true production large scale anchor tenants anchor workloads SaaS and ISV companies for sure. We've got to give them a set of tools to be able to wrapper all that. In addition to those tools open up an ecosystem a pretty vibrant third party ecosystem that affords you a bunch of services. Now where we stand we're never gonna build out a whole bunch of our services as other players are trying to do, they're trying to do the complete stack. Our goal is to be completely open and interoperable and partner. HP's had a history, a very rich history of partnering and we think our focus on ecosystem will allow us to do that. Having said that in our platform we've built out services like database as a service. We're doing analytics as a service.  So the idea is we're constantly trying to balance out the notion of what is it that we think will add value to developers and IT ops folks building out and managing workloads and how do we enhance the ecosystem by tying these pieces together.  So being able to orchestrate workloads across multiple environments up and down infrastructure and applications is vital and that's what sort of that piece is. And then we wrapper this all with the notion of a marketplace where our partners in the ecosystem and all the different services ultimately end up getting monetized. So the point is we're going after the enterprise production workload but we're building a complete stack for what we think is that that serves the needs of those workloads. So we're delivering this sort of innovative way to do that. Our work here sort of reinforces that every day but we're wrappering it with the notion of a true enterprise grade quality of service and SLA that has real teeth and working on orchestration. Those are kind of the things and ultimately with a default view that it's ultimately all open. If you look at some of the alternatives hypervisors are us or big big sort of integrated hardware software solutions out there you're essentially locking you in and we think that time has sort of come and gone and you can see some of the movements you can see some of the affinities around companies that a few years ago were completely in single stack mode and now we're actually vibrant partners in this community which is great. So speaking of ecosystem I've said this before we're only as good as our ecosystem. As a platform we are only as good as the vibrancy of this ecosystem. So in addition to building out core infrastructure and platform tools we're going to market with a bunch of these partners delivering solutions for customers at the enterprise level. So we've done a bunch of work in storage in management and platform as I talked about in DevTest the notion of taking DevTest all the way to production and honestly this speaks for itself. We've got some fantastic partners many of you who are here many of you know here with us and we're learning tremendous amounts here. We don't think you can innovate fast enough and deliver these solutions by yourself. So our goal is not to go try to you know do a better Panzura. I think we'll work with a company like Panzura. I think we'll work with someone like you know Feed Henry or you know some of the other tools out and services out here. So we're pretty excited about this. We've spent a lot of time learning and we're actually investing heavily in the ecosystem. This is our portfolio today. I just want to point out one thing. We stood up our public cloud in May middle of May and we actually turned on a GAID SLA backed service around object store and CDN within 60, 45, 60 days after that competing services. Other services have been in the market were in beta for months. So we're spending all of our time really trying to get this notion of a GA service with a SLA because that's the way we think enterprise production workloads are gonna get real on a cloud, on the cloud, right? And so this is a set of services we've built. As I said, with our partners and our portfolio we're rolling out a whole bunch more. So stay tuned for some good updates there but we're really sort of excited about sort of the next set of I think work that we'll be doing around sort of the current release. Finally, if you haven't I'd invite you to take a test drive. Please go check out HP Cloud and give it a shot. There's a three month free access. We've got a booth up here. I think Jonathan mentioned there's a party later on today so I'd love to sort of meet you and get to spend some time with you in person. But again, I just want to thank all of you and really the community for the effort here. What we're trying to figure out is how do you get to the production workload view? And we don't think it's something HP does alone. We're certainly going to push very hard for it where we think the landscape is. But I think it's really the responsibility of the community here for us to sort of make it real. So at the next summit, I'm hoping that we're going to get even more announces and a lot more use cases and a lot more actual, I think customers speaking and standing up and talking about how this is all getting real. So thank you for your time. I really appreciate it. Thanks for coming out and we look to see you later on today. Don't forget to join us for our party later on. Thanks very much. Thank you.


Remote sensing using unmanned aerial vehicles, UAVs, has become increasingly popular due to their ability to capture high-resolution images and data from difficult to access locations. This review focuses on the use of UAVs for remote sensing of vegetation in rangelands, forests and agricultural environments. It covers the various types of UAVs used for remote sensing, the different payload options available, and the applications of these UAVs in each environment. This article was offered by Esther Salami, Christina Bardu, and Enrique Pastor.


Hello everybody, E here. Welcome back to another book tag. Yeah, I'm just as surprised as you are This is the first one that I have done in well Over a year. I can't remember the last one that I did if I if I can find it I will throw it up at the end of the video Or if I have a book tag playlist I'll link to there But anyways today we are doing one from Raoul reads He is a relatively new channel to me my friend JB Taylor told me about him I think JB did this tag. It's called the can you adapt it tag, but Raoul Created this himself And we are going to jump in just jump right into it. I'm gonna try not to do a whole lot of cutting Just because I've been doing so much lately even with the new editor I can't send him everything because not all of it's you know long enough to to justify sending it off to him But so the for number one, I will also leave the questions down there for anybody who wants to jump in on this I will tag one or two people at the end I think only one because I once said a specific person in mind that that I want to see do this if they haven't already So number one, what is your favorite book adaptation? It is Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy. I absolutely love it I don't think it's a perfect adaptation. I don't think it needs to be I think Jackson Changed things around enough That that it was a it's its own entity while staying faithful to the book now the hobbit was absolute garbage But Lord of the Rings, I really loved it I can sit and watch the extended editions. Yeah, the three and four-hour versions back to back to back It is one of those films that never gets old for me And the only reason why Howard the duck isn't here is because I don't believe that Howard the duck is Anywhere near a good adaptation of like the comics or whatever But it is it is my favorite movie of all time So if you want to if you're gonna give me a pass I would say Howard the duck, but I'm gonna go with Lord of the Rings because I think it is a fantastic adaptation so number two What is your least favorite adaptation? This one is recent. This one upset me greatly I have still not been able to finish this movie I get about 15 minutes at a time and I just turn it off because I am unbearably bored and that is the Goldfinch The book is written by Donna Tartt and without Donna Tartt's words on the page and her beautiful prose This movie is Hollow it has It seems to want to be art. It wants to be something beautiful It just completely fails for me I can't like I said, I can't watch more than 15 minutes at a time I either fall asleep or I get up and go do something else or I start reading I'll pick up up my phone and start reading something or pick up a book and start reading it I just completely spaced out. So yeah, the Goldfinch. I'm pretty sure there's worse ones out there also None of this stuff is gonna be Stephen King if you want Stephen if you want a list that is all Stephen King for this Can can you adapt it a tag? Let me know down in the doobly-doo. I'd be happy to make it But I wanted to stay away from King because if I used King every single one of these things would be King If you could number three if you could adapt any book, which one would it be and why gone south easy? I would change a couple things with gone south. I would make The the girl with the birthmark. I would have her I would change her to Someone with a vitiligo You know have instead of a wine birthmark. I would have a skin condition where you know patchy Piebald sections of you know brown flesh and pale flesh I would do that instead and I'd probably update it to be a different war than Vietnam. I don't know but that's It's one of it's one of those books that I have always seen so vividly and so clearly in my mind that I think it would be super easy to adapt I think it'd be a blast to see it on screen, especially that opening man The air smelled of burning children something like that that opening line is absolutely killer. So number four What's one adaptation that was portrayed? Perfectly. I'm gonna say you Caroline Kepnes is you the Netflix special or lifetime. Whatever what everyone I think it's just Netflix now But uh, I think you was absolutely perfect. It got all the themes all the I think it landed everything Exceptionally well. I I loved the casting of Joe a beck everybody peaches is it peach peaches? I can't remember but peaches salinger because it's a JD salinger's daughter would not daughter, but like it was whatever but It was it was a perfect adaptation I think the casting was absolutely brilliant in both the first one and the second one even if season 2 strayed quite a bit from Hidden bodies, I still enjoyed it and I enjoyed the new characters that they added on to it I just feel like the whole thing is just at that adapted Fantastically it's not it doesn't quite beat out Lord of the Rings for me though So while I think it was I think Lord of the Rings is my favorite adaptation you is a very very close second Next up if you could star in any book adaptation, which one would it be and which character would you like to play? So I've thought about this a lot One of one of the characters that speaks to me the most if I was gonna be an actor And if I was gonna go out and do it and I may not fit the role whatsoever I may do a horrible job, but I would love to play the judge in blood meridian That's one of those characters that has always haunted me. I've never seen a character portrayed a character like that portrayed I don't want to say properly or that I would even do it properly, but I would have a lot of fun trying I think that's what I'm trying to say It's one of those it's one of those roles that I think would be a once-in-a-lifetime role for any actor Fortunately, I'm no actor. I'm not an actor But I would love to see that movie made and I would love to see the judge Portrayed by someone who could do it justice But if I had my choice in a perfect world, I would be given the shot to try it That's where I'm at. So number six when it comes to adapting a novel What's your preferred media TV mini-series or a film? I have absolutely no preference here whatsoever. I like movie adaptations. I like TV show adaptations all that stuff my Current favorite TV adaptation of course you I'm also enjoying Hannibal, but it's not really an adaptation as it is a completely new vision because they like blend Hannibal the book with red dragon They blend all different kinds of stuff. I mean dollar hide and verger are both in the same season. It's crazy, man Absolutely nuts, but it works so well. Brian Fuller and De Laurentiis and all them have worked on it. I think they did a fantastic job The last season is not my favorite, but I did enjoy it enough Am I one of those people who think the series should continue on? No, I don't I think it was a flash in the pan It was perfect for for what it was and I think even the third season was too much if you disagree Go ahead. Just let me have it down there in the doobly-doo I know I'm gonna have a lot of a lot of will and Hannibal shippers in here going.  Yeah, I understand. It's okay. Just hold on there in the comments All right, number seven if you could change anything from a recent adaptation What would it be? This isn't even out yet, but I am I'm gonna say this I'm gonna upset some people because I upset some people on Twitter doon The I don't know I don't understand as a huge fan of the movie Not the movie the book. I think it's a masterclass in omniscient narrative. I Don't like the look of the new film whatsoever. It looks like Rogue One. It looks like the Star Wars movies It looks overly produced even for sci-fi It just looks I hate the colors of it. It's a very boring looking movie It's just browns and blacks and grays and I understand why because you know the plant It's just the whole theme of the thing But yeah It's what doesn't look good to me at all the no interest whatsoever and the guy playing a trait a Traeus a trade a tradies Paula tradies the guy playing a tradies No, I don't know. It was a Timothy Chalamet or whatever and he playing wank also I don't know who the who the person is but I looked at that. I literally laughed at the television Well, actually it was my computer. I like to laughed at my computer screen Because I saw that I was like, oh, that can't be Paul that can't be Paul went and looked and it was Paul I was like, oh, no Anyway, so next up is eight. Is there a book adaptation better than the actual book? If so, which one I almost said The magical boy wizard. I'm not getting into that. I don't even want to I don't want to bring in either crowd You know the the the terfs or the anti-terfs. I don't want that. So I'm not gonna mention that at all what I am gonna say is those Those movies were better than any of the books for me and I didn't even like the movies So that's why I changed my My answer and my answer is the witches of Eastwick If you read was it update update? Hang on. It's sitting right.  I just I could care less I'd rather watch Cher and Susan Sarandon and whoever the other one is and Jack Nicholson You know mess around on screen that I would read this book Even though I think I gave the book three stars. It's got its issues It's an okay read but I really enjoyed the movie and I enjoyed the movie leaps and bounds Above the book. All right, so the last one is not a question at all But it does say can you tag it tag your friends? So I'm gonna tag booktube goddess If you don't know booktube goddess, you really should you need to go over to her channel. You need to check her out The number one drag queen on booktube. I think is she the only one it might not be I don't know, but I think that's the running joke the best drag queen on booktube She's absolutely fantastic and I get a kick out the editing the the costumes the the skits the reviews my favorite thing she does is the Shove it or shelve it or shelve it or shelve it whatever it is with that's my favorite thing because I I don't know It's something about that series that really speaks to me and I want to do it myself But I'm a mood reader so I don't if I set up something to go and read Ahead of time like what I'm gonna read in the next month. I might read one of them I'm definitely not gonna read all of them. Sometimes I won't read any of them That's why I don't I try not to do TBRs because I always let people down But anyways, so that was the can you adapt it? Thank you so much to Raul for making this this tag I really enjoyed it hence the reason I picked it and the reason why I'm willing to do it on an entire Stephen King version for you You constant readers out there if you want to Thanks to JB for putting this tag on my radar, but until next time I have an e you have been you It's been another book tag. I'll talk to you guys later. Bye. Bye


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overlord here We're gonna be talking about a few different horror topics in this video here today We'll be talking about I know what you did last summer the legacy sequel that's coming got an update on that finally We'll be talking about screen seven We'll be talking about the black phone too and then we have one last thing to go over regarding Jennifer's body too That came out today now starting off here. What I know what you did last summer We got an update on that sequel that came to us via screen ran a few days ago Writer Lee McKendrick says I think with Jen my director on I know what you did last summer It's scarier if you're seeing it in the eyes and when we're trusting our actors because I love dialogue I'm like, oh look at this woody one liner. It's going to be a meme I'm all obsessed with the pop culture aspects of it and the zeitgeist the zeitgeist the way That we could spread it but I have to remind myself that sometimes less is more and sometimes We just want the strongest moments to be in subtext trust your audience. They're going to get it You don't need to spoon-feed them now I love those last lines there from her about spoon-feeding viewers because you absolutely don't have to do that all The time if you're telling a cohesive story Sinister death also tweeted out recently about Freddie Prince jr. Being contacted despite saying otherwise The belief is that he just wants more money So we'll see what happens with this film going forward Jennifer love Hugh it again I still found it very strange She recently stated she would do it if she was asked But we had a report earlier that same year in 2023 that they had already been contacted So the fact that she said she would do it and never made a mention of the fact that they wanted her back for the sequel anyway That was a bit weird. So hopefully Jennifer love Hugh it comes back Hopefully Freddie Prince comes back and somehow some way if Sarah Michelle Geller can come back. Yes I know Helen is dead. You don't have to have Helen alive. Waskeet originating screen five and screen six Okay, I rest my case jumping into screen seven Sinisterl has provided this update related to screen seven releasing in 2025 saying that spyglass is still operating like screen seven will be a 2025 release The producers do want to change the negative press So my sense is we will hear about it pretty quick if anything major develops They then echoed a tweet I put out about a new director saying no deal yet But a new director is in advanced talks not Eli rock This person is particularly known for a cult classic. There's very much the same flavor as scream It's a good choice My best guess is again that it's someone responsible for a 2009 horror film That's my own personal prediction going off the fact that they are saying it's a cult classic So that's echoing my own best guest and just off of what I've heard that it has to be someone behind a 2009 hit horror film. That's just again my best guess. I don't know who it is exactly That's just my best guess I also wouldn't be shocked if spyglass starts hiding a lot of details due to Landon's horrible experience after Melissa was fired Whether we think it should be happening or not screen seven is not actually being canceled It's just trying to get back on track after going into a ditch that could have been avoided Yes, my preferred outcome still is that we get a movie with Melissa Barrera Jenna or Tega The core for story gets finalized But if we cannot do that spyglass again is still going to do what they have to do having spent so much money to obtain The IP they're gonna try to make back their money's worth. That's just the way the cookie crumbles Screams seven may or may not be a hit We'll just have to wait and see because 2025 could end up turning into 2026 Time will tell if screen seven ends up being a hit or if it ends up being a bust for spyglass So we're gonna talk about the black phone too. So the black phone too will reportedly start filming on June 3rd Scott Derrickson We know is returning to direct Ethan Hawke is back as the grabber and so are his child co-stars They gave us one of the greatest sibling dynamics in 2022 now The information regarding it filming in June on the third comes from production production lists for those of you who watch my Jeepers Creepers 4 coverage back in 2021 up until its release You know, I use production lists for a lot of things such as tracking down the cast tracking down the working title Then helped me track down the cast and I was revealing things before they dropped stuff. Thanks to production list My thing is that with the black phone too I love how the most fascinating aspect of the sequel so far is how will it work? Will the grabber be a Freddy Krueger like spirit stalking local kids? Will there be a copycat killer? How is Robin back? Robin was like the last spirit guy that appeared to Finney in the first film So I expect he'll just be a spirit guide once again to some degree It's Finney gonna be the one that gets kidnapped again Just so many different questions going into the black phone too in terms of how it's going to work And what's the narrative going to be? The last thing we're gonna talk about here is Related to well, actually, it's not the last thing. I'm gonna talk about Terrifier 3 really quick We got our first look at Art the Clown on set of Terrifier 3 looks like looks better than ever There was also an image that Lauren Lavera shared of her in New York We know that the film is supposed to be shooting in New York I shared some details about the rumored plot and how she's gonna be Sienna that being and Jonathan They're living with their aunt and uncle the uncle takes issue with Sienna as she has some sort of episode Think Sienna is gonna be a liability that could harm their daughter Sienna herself also takes issue with the cousin at question when the cousin discovers a journal entry that Sienna has been Detailing about her being chained to a dark abyss. She does not like that her cousin finds this and she snaps at her So to speak But this was a nice first look image at Art the Clown for Terrifier 3. What do you guys think about this? Do you think he looks good? Do you think he doesn't look good? Why or why not? Last thing we're gonna talk about here is Jennifer by Jennifer's body to so Diablo Cody Wants to bring back Megan Fox and Amanda safe read for Jennifer Jennifer's body to This was been speaking with comic book. They said I mean I would love to bring Megan and Amanda back That would be ideal I want to go back to that world so badly that I've brought or that I've thought of various permutations that we could do like we could do a prequel we could do a sequel we could do a Musical no, no, no, please don't do that And then she says I'm or they say I'm like anything anyone wants to do I'm down I just need to find the right partner previously They spoke with bloody disgusting and said they just needed like a billion dollars or so I think obviously a joke I think they said they needed to find a billionaire But it's nice to know that they still want to go back to this world It's nice that they would ideally want to do it with Amanda and Megan once again But I need to revisit Jennifer's body. I haven't watched it since last year But I need to revisit it. I try to watch that once a year. Honestly need to revisit it I hope Jennifer's body to Jennifer's body to can pick up some steam hopefully we can get that movie going and Hopefully Diablo Cody can get their wishes fulfilled and they will get to do the long overdue sequel that it seems like they are Dying to do would you prefer to see a sequel would you prefer to see a prequel? I wouldn't say I necessarily would prefer either outcome. I just don't want a musical since they brought up a musical That's the last thing I would prefer I would much rather you just do a straight-up sequel or a prequel and Go from there. Let me know what you guys think about all of this down in the comment section below If you haven't already of course, make sure you go ahead and subscribe turn on post notifications Say you never miss a video in the description. I'll have links to all of my social media accounts I'm on Facebook Twitter and Instagram you can message me there of course Let me know if there's any movies news or reviews you want me to cover in the future And I will have another video up tonight just to talk about this director situation for screen 7 I'll be posting that later tonight apologies for my voice. I am getting over a cold But with all that in mind guys, I will see you in the next video


for someone to find themselves in and we really must address it and address it quickly. We would like to see comprehensive implementation of Equally Safe and new laws to tackle all forms of violence against women. The Scottish Government introduced a lot of legislation and we have talked about that today. Legislation around FGM, forced marriage, lab dancing and the Trafficking Bill, which was brought forward initially by Jenny Marra, but unfortunately that did not deal with the demand for sexual exploitation and I think that is something that the Government needs to tackle and need to come forward and address. The main bill surrounding Equally Safe is the abusive behaviour and sexual harm bill and it has been watered down and is very much limited to revenge porn, which is worthy, but it is not the comprehensive bill that we are promised. They talked about going out again to consultation about coercive control. We need to know when that consultation will take place and indeed when a bill will be brought forward because I think that that is really important in dealing with domestic abuse. I believe that the whole Parliament can unite around Equally Safe. We think that it is only right that we point out our disappointment in the delay in its implementation. Delays in setting up the joint strategic board to implement the funding and the implementation of Equally Safe and any meaningful legislation coming forward. Voluntary organisations and many of them need to know where their funding is coming from and indeed the direction of travel. The Scottish Government has our full support in implementing Equally Safe. We simply ask them to give it priority. Thank you very much. I will now call on the minister, Mark Beatch, to wind up the debate. Minister, till 5 o'clock we are there by. Thank you, Presiding Officer. It is a privilege to add my voice to the many other voices that have today united in the condemnation of violence against women. I do so in the full awareness and indeed caution that that is a voice that is an octave or so lower than many, though not all, of the voices that have preceded it. On an issue that is so interlinked with the fundamental inequalities between genders, it is easy to feel a moment's hesitation. As a man speaking on this issue, do I just disempower women further? I think that we have heard here and I hope that all would agree that men have a critical role in this. Just as everybody has to be empowered to speak up, men have to be encouraged to speak out, to challenge the unacceptable attitudes and behaviours of other men. All men have mothers or sisters or nieces or other female relatives, but it would be a stark society where respect for women only came because of family. I would just ask, is our common humanity not enough? The respect for other human beings that says that this is violence and cruelty and it is unacceptable. This Scottish Government wants to see all lives free of violence and discrimination, whether that is the life of someone here in Scotland or one of the 35 per cent of women and girls who experience physical or sexual violence in their lifetime across the world. Tomorrow is the international day for the elimination of violence against women, and it has had an international flavour in the debate today. Malcolm Chisholm, for example, cited the Istanbul convention. It would be for the UK Government to be the state party to that, but we certainly believe that it sets a standard in international consideration of those issues. However, here in Scotland, and as a minister of our Government here in Scotland, I am proud of our record thus far on challenging and tackling violence against women. Funding is called for in Labour's amendment, and I am very glad to say that we have a strong record on this already. 11.8 million pounds in 2015-16, a further 20 million pounds announced by the First Minister in March. Some of the things that that pays for, specific support for children, as highlighted as an issue by Clare Adamson, but strategic funding to Scottish Women's Aid in Rape Crisis Scotland, 14 rape crisis centres, new service in Orkney and Shetland, specialist advocacy, work with LGBT in ethnic minority communities and national helpline, a network of almost 2,000 young mentors in secondary schools, a specialised domestic abuse court, training for NHS staff to spot abuse, a £3 million fund for local projects and Scottish Refugee Council work on female genital mutilation and much, much more. There is a record that we as a country can be proud of in taking action on this. Not on that last point on female genital mutilation, I would want to pay tribute to the Equal Opportunities Committee's work on this that was highlighted by Margaret McCulloch. Early in 2016, the multi-agency team we have will publish an action plan on this topic. It is part of the equally safe plan to take forward the nine recommendations that were made in tackling FGM in the UK report. That is an important point to say about equally safe, because it is a new strategy, but it builds on work that has been on-going. I draw distinction between the governance of equally safe and meetings that that involves and action that is being delivered. There are four work streams on this. Malcolm Chisholm mentioned capacity and capability, recognising the work that it does, but we should also recognise that that work stream emerged from an existing group of the Scottish Joint Council. However, when you are looking at the four work streams, the one that everybody was talking about was the prevent area. That met in October. It is made up of many of the groups that are working in this field. It is about tackling the attitudes in society and finding ways to turn around some of the things that have been highlighted.  That seems to me to be a very eloquent way of summing it up. I have to, on the issue of cultural representations, thank Fiona McLeod, because she has given me an excuse to link two of my favourite things in the world, equal rights and science fiction. She highlighted the Hunger Games as one cultural representation, sci-fi is as good an example as any, and in this one it is particularly good, because the actress Jennifer Lawrence is an A-lister who does not mince words with the media about the people who mentioned her weight. If Fiona McLeod was encouraged by the adverts beforehand, I could tell her stories about the time I went to see Mamma Mia and the adverts were making very broad generalisations and assumptions about who would be in the audience. It is important that representations like that can turn around, because the skewed demographic of that kind of film is itself a manifestation of the pink for girls, blue for boys syndrome that we want to get away from. If you are a young person who, as Eileen Murray pointed out, is at risk of using pornography as your first contact with sexual issues, it underscores the need for wider action, the work that is happening to update and improve our RSHPE in schools. Alison McInnes also pointed out the wider societal issue of the language that follows incidents. I have a message for the perpetrators of those. Violence against women is unacceptable in an argument. It is unacceptable based on dress, on those justifications that we heard about and that some people have about children. It is unacceptable on the meadows at night. It is just unacceptable. That should not need to be said that we live in a society where it needs to be said itself says a lot, but, fortunately, we are in a chamber where it only needs to be said to mark a point. No one in here, in this assembly of the nation's legislatures, would say anything else. So, like Fiona McLeod, I take from this debate an optimism that what we have as a debate here is not what the problem is but how we can best eradicate it. That is a good place to be in to deliver change. Our debate closes as 16 days of activity begin and there are countless organisations up and down this country championing and supporting the programme of work. All of them deserve our recognition and our thanks, and I think that across the chamber today we have expressed that. Organisations such as Scottish Women's Aid and Rape Crisis Scotland are making a huge difference to challenging violence and driving the agenda.  Zero tolerance is making a real contribution to tackling the outdated attitudes and gender stereotypes. Bodies such as in gender and close the gap are helping to advance gender equality in Scotland every hour of every day. I have been impressed by how often the research by girl guiding Scotland has been quoted informing the debate in a way that is incredibly helpful for all of us. We are trying as a government to show strong leadership, matching that with record levels of funding and strengthening the law, but we are working in partnership. Since the First Minister's election just over a year ago, we have seen a narrative of increased sophistication. As my minister said earlier, the prevention and eradication of violence against women and girls is at the heart of her personal and political agenda. We also have to be progressive in tackling gender inequality. The fact is that women do not enjoy equality to men in today's society. Eliminating the gender pay gap, ending segregation and employment, encouraging more women into senior positions and through partnership for change, encouraging 50-50 gender balance on boards by 2020. I am engaging with local government on the on-going scandal of equal pay, highlighted so ably by Christina McKelvie, 47 years on from Dagonham and 45 years on from the Equal Pay Act. We are also increasing opportunities for political representation. We have a gender balance cabinet, one of a few countries to have done so. All of those areas make a significant contribution to the equally safe objectives around primary prevention, which, as I said before, is what every single speaker seems to have put at the heart of their contribution. That approach is always going to be underpinned by a gender analysis, one that has drawn favourable comment internationally and has placed Scotland as a leader in this area. The commitment of this Government is strong and enduring, and today we have also repeated the message of the Parliament with one voice that we must ensure that women and girls in Scotland are free from violence and work together to achieve that. Thank you, minister. That concludes the debate on violence against women's 16 days of activism. There are two questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is amendment 14930.1, in the name of Elaine Murray, which seeks to amend motion 14930 in the name of Margaret Burgess, on violence against women, be agreed to. Are we all agreed? The amendment is therefore agreed to. The next question is at motion 14930, in the name of Margaret Burgess, as amended. On violence against women be agreed to, are we all agreed? The motion is therefore agreed to. That concludes decision time. We are now moving to members' business.


Ever wondered how to make $100 plus per day from your phone? Perhaps you've considered it. Or maybe this is an entirely new concept for you. Well consider this. That device you're holding isn't just for scrolling through social media or catching up on the latest news. It's a potential goldmine, a gateway to a world of endless earning possibilities. This isn't about quick cash schemes or unrealistic promises. No, this is about leveraging the power of your smartphone in the internet to create sustainable income streams. We're talking about transforming your everyday phone into a tool for financial freedom. From becoming a micro influencer to taking online surveys, from freelancing on the fly to delivering goods and even flipping thrift store finds for profit. And the cherry on top? We'll also dive into how artificial intelligence can make these ventures even more lucrative. Ready to transform your phone into a profit powerhouse? Stay tuned. Scene script. First stop on our journey. The world of social media. Welcome to the Micro Influencer Masterclass where we delve into the digital realm of Instagram and TikTok to transform your account into a lucrative venture. This isn't about gaining millions of followers or becoming an overnight sensation. It's about leveraging a modest following to generate a healthy income right from your phone. You see, brands are increasingly recognizing the value of micro influencers. These are individuals who might not have the largest following, but they have an engaged audience that trusts their recommendations. And that's gold for marketers. So if you're passionate about a particular topic, why not share it on your platform? You might be wondering how do I monetize this? Well, there are a few ways. Firstly, sponsored posts. Brands are willing to pay good money for you to showcase their products on your platform. The key here is authenticity. Only partner with brands that align with your values and interests and your followers will appreciate the genuine endorsement. Next, affiliate links. This is where you promote a product and every time someone makes a purchase through your link, you earn a commission. It's a win-win situation. The brand gets exposure and sales and you get a cut of the profits. And finally, why not sell your own products? If you've got a skill or a craft, social media is a great place to market it. Whether it's handmade jewelry, digital art, or even an e-book, your followers are likely to be interested. But remember, success as a micro influencer isn't just about selling. It's about building relationships with your followers. Be authentic, engage with your audience, and provide valuable content. With a little creativity and a lot of passion, your social media platform can become a gold mine. And the best part? You can do it all from your phone, wherever you are, whenever you want. That's what I call the laziest way to make money. So, what are you waiting for? It's time to turn your digital presence into a revenue stream. Next up, we're diving into the world of online surveys and micro tasks. Imagine getting paid for your opinions and clicks. Sounds too good to be true, right? But platforms like Prolific or Amazon Mechanical Turk have turned this dream into reality. These platforms offer a plethora of short, easy tasks that anyone can complete. You could be watching a video, classifying images, or filling out a simple survey, and guess what? You're getting paid for it. It's like making money while scrolling through social media. But instead of just killing time, you're accumulating wealth. The tasks might seem small, but remember, every penny counts and they add up fast. So next time you're lounging on your couch or waiting in line for coffee, why not make some cash on the side? With every click, you're one step closer to that $100 plus per day goal. Have a skill or talent. Here's how to monetize it from your phone. Let's dive into the world of freelancing on the fly. This is all about taking what you're good at and selling it to clients who need your expertise. Freelancing platforms like Upwork or Fiverr are the digital marketplaces where you can connect with clients from all over the globe. These platforms are teeming with opportunities for writers, graphic designers, social media managers, translators, and so much more. If you have a skill, there's a high chance someone is willing to pay for it. Think of your phone as a mobile office. It's where you can create proposals, interact with clients, deliver projects, and receive payments. It's an all-in-one tool that can help you manage your freelance business with ease. Now you might be wondering, how do I find the right clients? Well, the beauty of these platforms is that they often have a built-in search function that allows you to filter jobs by skill, budget, and deadline. You can also create a compelling profile that showcases your work, your skills, and your rates. This way, clients can find you too. Don't worry if you're just starting out. Everyone starts somewhere. You might have to take on lower paying jobs at first to build your reputation and portfolio. But as you gain more experience and positive reviews, you can gradually increase your rates. And remember, freelancing isn't just about making money. It's also about freedom. Freedom to choose the projects you want to work on. Freedom to work when and where you want. Freedom to be your own boss. So what are you waiting for? Your skills are valuable, and your phone is the perfect tool to share them with the world. Find a freelancing platform that suits you, create an attractive profile, start bidding for jobs, and turn your phone into a freelancing powerhouse. Your skills are valuable, and your phone is the perfect tool to share them with the world. Ready to get moving? Let's talk about delivery apps. They're not just for ordering pizza anymore. Think about it. We're living in the age of convenience. People want things delivered to their doorstep, and that's where you come in. Apps like DoorDash or UberEats have turned delivery into a lucrative side hustle. All you need is a vehicle and some spare time. Whether you're on a bike, in a car, or even on foot, you can start earning. You're essentially turning your commute or your daily errands into an income stream, and the best part is, you decide when you work.  And let's not forget the tips. Many people tip generously, especially during these challenging times, and that can significantly boost your earnings. So why wait? Turn your commute into a profitable journey with delivery apps. Have an eye for hidden treasures? Reselling could be your ticket to $100 plus per day. This is the reselling revolution, where your smartphone becomes the key to unlocking profits. How, you ask? Well, it's as easy as buy low, sell high. There are countless online marketplaces at your fingertips like Poshmark or Mercari, where you can buy and sell anything from vintage clothing to use furniture. Perhaps you've got a knack for finding designer brands at thrift stores, or maybe you're a pro at spotting valuable collectibles at garage sales. With reselling, you turn these items into gold mines by listing them online for a profit. And the best part? You control the prices, the inventory, and the hours. All you need is your phone and a keen eye for what sells. It's like running your own retail store, but without the overheads and, of course, the commute. Reselling turns your phone into a treasure hunt with the treasure being cold, hard cash. Now, let's supercharge your phone-powered income with some AI content hacks. These tools aren't just clever, they're game changers that can turn your phone into a genius moneymaker. First up, we have Jarvis. This AI-powered tool can whip up catchy captions for your social media posts and ads. Imagine being able to hook your audience in seconds while you're off catching some ZZ's. That's the power of Jarvis. Next, we have Unsplash. This isn't just a website, it's a treasure trove of stunning royalty-free images for every niche. You don't need expensive photos to captivate your audience. With Unsplash, you can make your phone content visually stunning without even touching your wallet. Then there's Hashtagify. This tool is your secret weapon to becoming a Hashtag hero. It analyzes popular hashtags and suggests the best ones to boost your content's reach. More visibility means more potential customers. With Hashtagify, your content isn't just seen, it's sought out. AmperMusic is another game-changing tool. This platform offers a library of royalty-free music with AI recommendations. You can add professional soundtracks to your videos or podcasts without having to worry about any pesky copyright issues. With AmperMusic, you're not just a content creator, you're a music maven. Last but not least, we have Lumen5 and Biteable. These tools can turn your phone footage into engaging videos in minutes. Add music, text and effects to impress your viewers and generate income, all without spending hours on editing.  With these AI tools, your phone isn't just smart, it's a genius moneymaker. So, go ahead and mix your hustle with some AI magic, experiment, track your results and refine your phone-powered income streams. Remember, your financial freedom is just a few taps away.


So the movie has a great cast. What would you say is your funniest or most memorable moment from filming? My funniest, most memorable moment. I mean, we lived together in the camp that we were filming in. Every single Saturday night, which is our only night off because we worked six day weeks, and a 23 day shoot. Sasha and I would throw these dance parties in the main lobby of this camp that we were living in. So I would DJ, and Sasha would start off with the dance battles, and that would be what we did every single Saturday night. It was very fun. This sounds amazing. I didn't realize you lived together. Yes, we all lived in, we were filming in the rooms that we were like living in. So it was immersive. Do you have a favorite go-to tune? Obviously, like everything Miss Yalia, followed by TLC, Destiny's Child. Like, you know what I mean? The heavy hitters. And you were taking part in the dance battles as well? Oh yeah, for sure. But she definitely like was at the helm and I would be the auxiliary corps DJ. So we loved your chemistry with Koli. How did you guys bond together before filming? You know, she was just a really wonderful woman. She's an incredible filmmaker herself. And I really respected her and she jumped into this role. And we had met each other 24 hours before filming. It was very much so a shotgun shoot. So I think that added to the organic sensibility that you feel on screen. So your intimate scenes are very realistic. Can you talk us through what they would like to film? I've been doing sex scenes in movies since I was 16. But this is the first one that I had ever done where it was directed by a woman. And the entire sentiment of filming it was completely different. She, Desirakavan, our director, was so incredibly confident in giving Quinn and I the reins on making sure that we could depict what we needed to depict in this. Instead of micromanaging, which had happened in every other movie I'd done. And how awkward is it? Like, are you doing retakes again and again? Or what do you do when they're called cut?  You know, it's an incredibly intimate process. So what was nice about this is Desi literally made herself scarce and made the entire crew disappear. So it was just Quinn and I and our DP who was the camera operator. So it was very normal. Why would you say talking about the issue of gay conversion therapy is still so relevant? You know, I think it's a massive issue in America because a lot of it is based on fear. People react out of fear to things that they are unaware of or don't feel within themselves. And ultimately, you know, they react in a negative way and these camps prey on fear.


a month heal if you're sick for a decade and maybe it takes a year to heal. Sounds like in your case and in many of the animals and what I've read from some of the people have used the coils that there's a quickening there, a shortening. And I'm wondering if you see that with meditation as well, this idea of the shortcut that there is a way to get into the meditative state a little bit faster for those that don't want to necessarily go to or sit in a monastery or it may not have time for that. Yeah, that's precisely what this can do. It's a meditation shortcut. So, I mean, when we learn to meditate, we're basically learning to train our thoughts, train our breath, train our relaxation, and awareness of where the energy, how it's flowing and so on, right? So, and be able to calm our minds to certain states and to translate states and so on and project energy and things like that.


Okay, for the second problem, we're doing another straight conversion from one set of units to a similar set of units, so density to density. We're going from grams per cubic centimeter to kilograms per meter cubed. So the two conversion factors that you need are up there at the top of the page. The one kilogram equals 1,000 grams and one meter equals 100 centimeters. Both of them you should know by now, you should know your metric to metric conversions. So the density in kilograms per meters cubed, how do you calculate it? Well, you just get the density of aluminum that the problem gave you, 2.7 grams per cubic centimeter. And then you take the grams and convert it to kilograms because that's the eventual mass unit you want. So use that first conversion factor, put in the grams at the bottom, kilograms at the top, those cancel. So now you're in units of kilograms per cubic centimeter. So remember that the conversion factor is one meter equals 100 centimeters. So we got to remember to cube the whole conversion factor, not just the centimeters and meters. So oftentimes we forget our undergraduate students forget to cube the 100, the number 100. So I like to show you that for the first time to just do it three times like that. So you can see it that you're actually using that conversion factor three times. So you're canceling out centimeters, centimeters, and centimeters again. And then if you multiply meters, dims, meters, dims, meters in the bottom, you get meters squared. So that will give you your units of kilograms per meter squared. So when you multiply all that out, you get 2.7 times 10 cubed or 10 to the third kilograms per meters cubed. So in order to do it the quicker way, so you don't have to write all those centimeters per meters conversion factors.  And as you see, you get the same answer. So remember your sig figs, two sig figs in the answer. If the given numbers had two sig figs, which they did 2.7. Okay, hopefully this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.


Hi everyone. Robert P. Murphy here. I'm an economist giving a lecture for the Online Mises Academy. Today we're going to be talking about supply and demand. And we're going to be focusing on the chapter for my textbook, Lessons for the Young Economist. Now if you want to get this book, there's a free PDF version. You just Google Robert Murphy, Lessons for the Young Economist PDF. You'll be able to find it. Or of course if you go to the Mises Institute bookstore you can get the hard copy. Now I should stress at the beginning that even though the Mises Institute is the leading bastion of Austrian economics, the material in today's lecture is actually going to be fairly mainstream. And I think that it's important to stress supply and demand and how to draw typical supply and demand curves that just about any professional economist would endorse because it helps organize our thinking. So in many other areas Austrian economists including me are very skeptical of the curves that one would draw like marginal cost curves and so forth when you're doing the theory of the firm because it gives a misleading account of what happens in the real world. But actually when it comes to just standard supply and demand graphs I think that they're actually very useful to help organize your thinking. So the first thing I want to stress is that we don't have as economists a theory of supply and demand. It's not really a theory. That's not the right way to think about it. There is nothing that could ever come up that would make economists say oh my gosh we we've been using supply and demand all these years but actually it turns out that's wrong. That these things are an invalid way of looking at the world. That's not really what would happen and if you think that could happen you're misunderstanding what supply and demand curves do. So what they are and we're going to go through in the course of this lecture exactly how they work but from a 30,000 foot view what they are is just a way of organizing our thoughts coherently so we can put the various factors that might move prices and quantities around into different categories and that just helps us to make sure we're thinking through things properly and really what it does more than anything else is helps us to avoid arguing in a circle and so you just believe it or not just within the last two weeks I think I've used supply and demand three separate times that I can remember off the top of my head that either giving up one time I was actually giving a lecture and somebody in the crowd asked me something and it had to do with interest rates and he was worried about well wait a minute you said that if people save more interest rates tend to go down but then wouldn't that make people want to borrow more so would that push the interest rate back up and I had to just you know I was trying to argue with him in words and get him to see why that doesn't work and then I finally had to go to the board and draw supply and demand curves to show him what I was trying to say and why his particular worry was unfounded you might also see that same kind of confusion or circular argument a lot of people are talking about oil prices for some reason I've seen it a lot in that context where someone will say something like oh OPEC cut its production quota this quarter they just made the announcement they're going to be reducing output by such and such barrels per day so that means the supply is going to go down so that means the price of oil will go up but with the higher price of oil that means people will demand less of it and so that'll push the price back down and so you're left wondering well wait a minute does when all is said and done is the price higher or lower than when you start it you see the problem there so it looks like you never know where you end up and it looks like a price hike turns into a price fall and vice versa so that's the kind of thing at this introductory level that I want to make sure that the student learns how to avoid that I want the student to be able to think through and understand the impact of some external change on prices and quantities and for that type of exercise like to be able to say suppose OPEC all of a sudden surprises everyone by announcing it's going to produce less oil per day what's going to happen just to be able to think logically through the sequence of events and end up with a coherent answer that's the kind of thing that introductory supplying demand curves are great for or for the first issue I brought up where the gentleman was concerned that well wait a minute if people end up saving more the yet it might initially push down interest rates but then won't people borrow more because it's cheaper to borrow and won't that push up interest rates and it seems like we can never get interest rates to move on where the other that there would be this automatic reverse process that would kick in it's that kind of thing that I want to equip you to be able to think through so it's not that you're going to end up with quantitative predictions about what's going to happen but just that you can organize different forces in your mind and that you understand whether the outcome is going to be to in one direction or another that's the modest goal that we have but it's a very important one and that's fundamentally what thinking through supply and demand will help you do for an analogy it's perhaps like a household making up a monthly budget right just just saying okay they sit down and said let's say it's a couple they sit down they look at their bills they look at their pay stubs and other sources of income and they just put it into a standard budget and it's not that they have a theory of finances when they do that and it's not that putting the numbers into a budget somehow changes their financial picture and especially if they just start using Excel to generate pie charts or graphs over time to show you know hey what's our credit card debt been over the last 12 months and so forth I mean that's just different ways of organizing the information for the couple so that they can really get a sense of the big picture and understand their situation and certainly influences the decisions they'll make but it's not that the that the construction of a budget commits them to one view or another it's not that the budget per se makes them want to cut spending or makes them have to go get a second job or says oh we can afford that trip I mean it's the budget constructing the budget helps you understand the reality and so by the same token using supply and demand curves in and of itself does not commit you to becoming a free market economist you could be a Marxist in you supply and demand curves or you could be a Keynesian you supply and demand curves it's what you do with them that ultimately determines what your policy prescriptions would be or how you interpret them so the last point on that is sometimes it's true you will hear people say something like let's say there's a snowstorm and then the price of canned goods and tuna fish and things like that goes up at the store and batteries and flashlights and bottled water everything it's really expensive and some people are outraged and other people you can imagine who have taken introductory course in economics might scoff at these ignorant rubes and say oh come on that's just supply and demand and that that is true in the sense that using supply and demand it's obvious to us why you would expect prices to rise in a free market when there's a snowstorm and then people are concerned about the availability of getting their hands on those goods if the roads are closed and they're snowed in but strictly speaking just supply and demand curves per se doesn't mean that this is a good outcome or that we shouldn't worry or that the government has no role in doing something about this outcome so as we go through this course and go through my book lessons for the economist we are going to come up with some conclusions and we're going to walk through some things to understand what would be the likely consequences if the government were to pass a law saying it's illegal for merchants to raise prices on batteries and bottled water and so on and we're going to use supply and demand curves in those explanations for me to try to illustrate to you what the consequences would be but my point is the curves themselves are just the concepts of supply and demand is just a neutral framework that helps us organize our thoughts


Welcome to Toffie TV, these are the player ratings for Bournemouth 2, Everton 2, in Gold, Jordan Pickwood. I've given him an eight, I thought he's kicking especially for the first goal, oh sorry to send him off, was it to send him off, sorry was brilliant the way he got woke off free, made some really important saves and I thought he was back to his best today, I think hopefully that's all the rustiness gone from his game and I thought he played really really well today, he gets an eight for me, James Coleman, he gets a five, I thought he was poor, I thought he was really poor in forward positions more than anywhere else, every time with a chance to break, he kept on letting the ball go across him and he went out a few times and every time he went to take the four back on, the four back seemed to get the better of him and just down to poor control more than anything, so he gets a five, Lane Baines equally gets a five, I thought he was rubbish as well, the penalty giveaway was just absolutely pointless and changed the game, swung the momentum back in their favour and if he just left the lad, just didn't touch the lad, just got round the other side of the lad, the pressure would have been dealt with and you know for me that was the turner pointing the game, once they got the penalty and scored the penalty all the momentum was back on their side, so you get a five, Mason Holgate, I've given Mason Holgate a six, again I didn't think he was brilliant today, he dealt with what he needed to deal with but I think at times he showed his naivety around our box, not dealing with things and not necessarily being in the right position to deal with balls over the top, I think he got caught out a couple of times as well, so I've given him a six, yeah, Keane, I've given him a seven and I think I've added one on for the goal to be honest, again I don't think he, I don't think him or Mason Holgate commanded enough at the back there today, I don't think they dealt with the forwards enough, I think they were caught far too many times isolated or you know just letting the ball go over their head and not being in good positions, I just think that, I don't know, I just don't think the, I just don't think they coped well enough as a pair and you know the second goal, not saying it's their fault but I'm saying that's a indication of where we're not dealing with the ball but fair play to Keane obviously, he went off with a really really bad injury and he got a goal as well so I'm going to give him, I'm going to give him seven. Tom Davis, I've given him a five, I thought, I thought he started the game okay, he was neat and tidy but again it was like what happened last week, he falls into that, he falls into that role of just getting the ball and giving it and he's, for me last week in the second half, I thought he grabbed hold of the game and started being a little bit more adventurous and started being you know playing the ball in the right areas and I just thought today he was far too safe when he had the ball and then second half he just didn't cope with the pressure of the ball of players and then that's something that he needs to really balance out in his game because it's, we massively missed Snadlin today, we really did, we missed that linchpin in midfield but just the ball couldn't go through, just keep the ball going through all the time and I just thought it's not his game, Tom's not a direct replacement for Snadlin and I just think until Gomez comes back or obviously Snadlin comes back, Gomez is the natural replacement for Snadlin and Tom isn't, Tom's the replacement for Garner if anything or even more of a replacement for Sigarton failing up the pitch but he's definitely not a replacement for Snadlin and I think when Snadlin's not in there there's no one doing that job and I think that was costly in the second half especially when we were 2-0 up, we needed that player in midfield, you could just get on the ball and take the sting out of the game, Tom's not in and I just didn't think he played well today Garner, I'll give him a 6, marginally better than Tom today doing his own job, I think loads of times he's got this horrible habit of when he's in the box he just kicks it away and it ends up 10 yards away defeated the opposition, again he's a player who's got to get older the ball and use it better although he did sniff out all the dangers today and did his job a little bit better than Tom did so I've given him a 6, with Charleston I've given him a 4, to be honest it could be less because he hadn't really done anything in the game before he'd been sent off, he's sent them off was stupid and that's exactly what it was it was just stupid, there was no need for it and it was like if you're going to get sent off for something, get sent off for something like you're going to miss three games now, you know you're going to miss obviously two games before the international break and I think West Ham after it so you know he's been a really important player for us in the first two games and today's really had himself banned by just doing something stupid, just walk away from the idiots, don't get involved and simply don't you know motion your head in his in his general direction because what do you think it's soft or whatever it's the law now so yeah disappoint you could be well though I could actually be being too generous there, Guilfee I've given Guilfee a six and a half, his cross for the second goal was brilliant, he could have got the winner in the last minute really was in a real good early forum, he had a decent enough game without really sort of grabbing it like he did last week obviously under difficult circumstances this game he was moved over more onto the left hand side in with Charles into his absence and he did okay, wasn't brilliant wasn't terrible he did okay but I've given him a six and a half, woke up I've given him a seven and the goal just mostly for the goal and the sending off you know the goal he finished it really really well and the sending off he played that really really well and he's always a threat listen of course there's times where he's frustrating because you just want him to get it out of his feet and have a pop up but he's always a threat for us, he's always a danger and that's going to become more important in the next couple of games without the charlison in the side so I've given Wolcott a seven, Towson I've given a six again it's difficult this because he doesn't get enough with the ball in the in the danger areas it's both what woke up him was brilliant and generally his link up play is really good but he doesn't he's not getting into areas that he can become a goal scorer and threat again I don't put that down for him we're trying to adapt to a new system and he's sort of getting the the brunt out of it because it is a lot of it is to get the the wingers into into the game he had one opportunity in the first half that he put over um wasn't a clay cut chance but that was only really his his only chance at the game but listen he's working really hard I'll give him six and a half because I think he's working really hard unselfishly so um so yeah so as I said I don't I don't think it's his fault the subs don't look at me when I give a six he'll run around a bit silver I've given silver a six I was a little bit disappointed that I tune it up he didn't make a change that would take this thing out the game I think if he'd made that change I think you know what Kate Zume could he have come on and played defensive centre midfield he played there for Chelsea and done a job there he's a two earlys the manager not seeing enough of him there weren't really the options on the bench to bring anyone on a back point to centre midfield because there's not really anyone there but could Kate Zume have done that job in centre midfield could he have gone to three at the back and maybe took um took Tom Davies off and said you know put two in the middle or even took you know took toson off and put woke up off front I just think he could have changed the game at 2-0 to just to just keep us in control it's still a massive amount of naivety about this evidence team at the moment especially when it comes to defending set pieces Jesus Christ we need to sort that out um but that hopefully that'll come I'm hoping that'll come but I think Silver could have could have helped by bringing someone off the bench there's just calm things down a little bit in midfield tune it up your cruising calm it down don't need to be gunk out why are we getting caught on the counter attack when we're tuning it up why just calm it down get get someone in midfield to get over the ball and I think maybe the game could have been different anyway let me know your thoughts have I been too generous have I um been a little bit a little bit nasty to a couple of places let me know your thoughts thanks for watching I'll see you later