What's up everyone? It's your girl Kenzie here from Leighton Sports Cards, and I'm ripping a personal for Chris B We've got four 2022 Bowman Chrome Baseball hobby boxes. Best of luck here Chris. Thanks again for hopping in Let's see when getcha Eight autos coming your way already Let's see some Nice little numbered first autos here for you What a super too super would be super would be super Yeah, everyone force will be live starting at five for some group breaks tonight Sam will also be live on drip tonight ripping some personals as well No personals on the main channel tonight after group breaks just with Sam on drip Then you can download the drip app or go to drip shop dot live and look us up under Leighton Sports Sports we got a torque rookie base Came to leave refractor averson or tega It's still in the chat. Sorry thought you left the lead We've got purple Robert Hassel Padres that purple is one sixty two of two fifty Kunya Blaise Jordan Ramos Joe Ryan. We've got a JT Schwartz auto for the Mets JT Schwartz Quavo Walker Kenzie Gore rookie Goldschmidt's Curtis Meade shades of greatness Juan Frito Olsen Shane Boz. We've got shimmer Jordan Loller Make York Cabrera Second mini box here Kyle Tucker Alonzo Tyus Campos moody cappy Detmer's Buxton woman Diaz Mendez De La Cruz And yeah, we got speckle Khalil Watson Marley, it's not number Vera Lonnie Wayne jr.  For the Cubs Love the atomic that is so sick Detroit legend Spencer Torkelson Yeah, that's exactly who he's talking about Arias and Watson Daily Cruz. We have a Curtis Meade and Victor Zavala Gutierrez Thanks for the follow Bryson Smell a hater Cal Nick Marta. Jose Ramos Andrew Baker All right. Nice atomic out of that first box there. All right box two here for you Chris the real legend of Detroit right agree who you like better why you like green or torque you think green is better I mean Riley's like one of my best friends, so yeah, I don't think I've ever seen Spencer Torkelson Oh, really?  We've got blue Nolan Aeronado.  He's Carlson. We have a redemption here Quintana Valera Dungeon time. Good luck, Chris Bowman Chrome prospects autograph of Norway Vera for the White Sox You know White Sox First bowman auto say Donaldson Colton Couser Purple here Purple first shimmer of Simon Juan for the Mets. That one is 135 out of 250 like the shimmer look on the Ford and more bell Cos this cap purpose Refractor rookie shape the greatness Josh Lowe. Josh Lowe. Sorry. Gutierrez, Virdigo Suzuki rookie kind of green speckled dust and Harris rangers True Baker Zavala We have a Jose Rodriguez first auto rangers Jose Rodriguez Jump back in Chad. Why'd you get this time? Refresh, let's see what you got Chad get this time You got a sterling box 2022 sterling nice Panetta Isaac Pacheco on the Invicta Guzman and Montgomery nah Dela Cruz Jason Dominguez it came to the league Blaze Jordan and Robert Hassel we are playing against him who Jason Dominguez So how does that work so you're in triple a no no single a so go single double triple and then What are you in single a you're in single He plays for the Red Sox Pitcher for the Red Sox Arias Hernandez York Chata, we've got purple Luis on Hello, Kunya nice one there rangers 46 of 250 Dela Cruz Campos Crawford Marsh speckle auto 30 of 299 don't know Williams Orioles Dante probably Lonnie white jr. Mendez He asked if they're doing you guys more salary now. I hope so Mirrors Marcelo Meyer Watson Says someone who's been here for two days You've got fuchsia speckle of Hedbert Perez that is eight out of 199 Hedbert Perez Gutierrez Arias Linda's Killian Baker and Zavala Second mini box here got a torque rookie base Detroit legend Kosa Montgomery Wonderfranco rookie base. We've got rookie lava. Nice Suzuki 149 of 199 cups Freilich Armstrong and Ohtani. We have a first for the Giants a Ryan Reckley Ryan Reckley first auto Lorenzo J. Allen You're probably a top five, so O'Neal cruise shades of greatness Ricky Eddie I've got Westcath bangles and eagles Triantos Paulino as Perez Quentin Kouser came to the league last pack box three Judge Jimenez white wood and Benny Montgomery Alright one more box here for you Chris. Good luck Can everyone be sure to check out the website rich posted up these Super Bowl mixer? 400 boxes including a 2000 black diamond box looking for Brady rookie. There's some 2017 product in there to 2018-19-20 Some 2006 there's a bunch of stuff in there. Definitely check that out. His name's Blake He's not really that new white. You've just been busy. You've been here. What a couple months. You said I've been here for two days Well Rockman he probably thought I was serious Name is Blake Yeah Got purple Simon one for the Mets 126 out of 250. Oh, I was being sarcastic being facetious Look at you using big words That's just on we've got a Liam Spence first auto for the Cubs couple Cubs. I was coming your way Chris Spence yes, and headbert Perez Got you cap a onesie tow bar Julio Rodriguez base rookie we've got purple shimmer Marcello Meyer nice one there 200 of 250 Blake's buddy right there. We're Gola Benchow Bruhan Zach Thompson Valesquez and McLean All right, last many box Chris Louise on Hella Kunya. Speckle first of Daniel Vasquez Royals There's and Garcia There's Kirby. We've got a de los Santos refractor first auto 241 of 499 pirates Leo Chris Jason Dominguez Mitchell Let's see another color before the end of the box here Wander Franco shades of greatness refractor rookie Raquel Vendee Castro and Victor Leonard Loller Romeo Cruz rookie base that came to the league Marcello Meyer Last pack here Chris Me and the carol. Alrighty Chris. That will do it for your four boxes of Bowman chrome Thanks again so much for hopping in we'll get these right out to you


Cymru Cymru. Chesad獵ilaeth. I have a big question today. The just published recommendation of the NHS pay review body for a 1 per cent consolidated pay rise for all agenda for change staff will be accepted in full by this Government. The Parliament will recall that, last year, Scotland was the only part of the UK to accept the pay review body recommendation. Kezia Dugdale. Thank you, Presiding Officer, and we very much welcome that. Yesterday, the First Minister confirmed that she still supports full fiscal autonomy for Scotland within the United Kingdom. That means that all tax and spending from Scotland remains in Scotland. Can the First Minister confirm that full fiscal autonomy means scrapping the Barnett formula? Yes or no? First Minister? Well, so much for the new style patriotic Scottish Labour Party. It didn't really last very long, did it? The first opportunity they grabbed to get right back on to the same side as the Tories to gleefully tell Scotland how useless they think we are. The Barnett formula, of course, will remain in place until such times as this Parliament is in charge of our own fiscal and economic decisions. It is members of the unionist parties on all sides of this chamber that pose the risk to the Barnett formula in the meantime. I also say to Kezia Dugdale that the only cuts that are on the horizon this year or the following year for Scotland are the cuts that were planned by Westminster, regardless of whether it is the Tories or Labour. It is only a few weeks since Labour trooped through the Tory lobbies to vote for £30 billion of cuts. It's Labour who, if left to their own devices, will impose cuts on Scotland, and the only way to stop them is to vote SNP because only the SNP offers an alternative to Tory austerity. Kezia Dugdale? As the First Minister well knows, full fiscal autonomy does mean scrapping the Barnett formula. Only in the world of the SNP would we stop paying into a UK-wide system but expect the same system to continue to pay out to us. Last year, the First Minister said that scrapping Barnett would cost Scotland £4 billion. Yesterday, Scotland's official accounts confirmed that she was absolutely right. Does Nicola Sturgeon still agree with herself that scrapping Barnett would have cost Scotland £4 billion last year? Everybody will be noticing that the people applauding most loudly for Kezia Dugdale were our colleagues on the Tory benches. Kezia Dugdale referred to the motion that Labour proposed and voted for in the House of Commons last week. Luckily, I brought a copy of that motion with me today, so I'm going to read it to Kezia Dugdale. It calls on the Government to take an approach that involves, and I quote, reductions in public spending. In other words, what Labour voted for in the House of Commons last week was further cuts to be imposed on Scotland, and it's because the SNP doesn't propose cuts that we voted against Labour's austerity motion in the House of Commons. We face a choice at the heart of the figures that were published yesterday. We can decide that we want to stay at the mercy of never-ending Westminster cuts, cuts that have already cost the Scottish budget £12 billion and are estimated to cost it £14.5 billion over the next five years. We can take more control over our own finances so that we can build a better future. I know what side of that choice I'm on. I also know what side of that choice Kezia Dugdale and Labour is on. It's the same side as the Tories. The First Minister has said repeatedly that scrapping the Barnett formula would have cost Scotland £4 billion last year. This SNP leaflet puts three doors at the moment and says that scrapping Barnett would lead to billions of pounds worth of cuts. SNP cuts, with a plumeting oil price, the independent air experts at the FSBC. The cost of Scotland will rise to around £6.6 billion. That means massive spending cuts over and above what we would get from the Tories winning in May. Huge cuts to the budget for our NHS and our schools. It's austerity on a scale never seen before in Scotland. It's austerity max, Presiding Officer. Can the First Minister tell us how many jobs in Scotland would be lost under the SNP's plans to scrap the Barnett formula? I don't think that it will have escaped anybody's notice that Kezia Dugdale has just said that Westminster Governments pose a threat to NHS funding in Scotland. I seem to remember that during the referendum Labour denied point blank that that was the case. It's because people know that they cannot trust a single word that Scottish Labour says any more, that people in Scotland are deserting them in their droves. Kezia Dugdale has got a nerve to come here today and scare monger mythical cuts when just 60 miles away from here, the most senior Labour councillor in the country is calling on the Scottish Government to take away the old people's bus passes, introduce tuition fees and start charging again for prescriptions. I think that Labour needs to sort itself out before it comes to this chamber to lecture anybody else. I asked the First Minister very specifically about jobs. According to the SNP Government's own economic modelling, reducing Government spending in Scotland by £6.5 billion would mean a cut of around 5 per cent in our GDP. Forget the dry theoretical numbers, Presiding Officer, I think that Labour needs to sort itself out before it comes to this chamber to lecture anybody else. That's one in every 16 jobs. Thousands of families facing the prospect of being out of work and struggling to make ends meet, and the cause of it would be the SNP's reckless plan for full fiscal autonomy. After years of telling us only they stand up for so many years of telling us that the SNP is going to take away the old people's bus passes. I think that Labour needs to sort itself out before it comes to this chamber to lecture anybody else. I think that Labour needs to sort itself out before it comes to this chamber to lecture everybody else. If they stand up for Scotland, we now know that the reality is different. Far from standing up for Scotland, isn't it the case that the SNP's Barnett bombshell would cost well over 100,000 Scottish jobs? If anybody wonders why Labour is in the dire straits that it is in, it only has to listen to Kezia Dugdale today. She's got the temerity to mention jobs. Under this Government, we've got lower unemployment and higher employment than any other part of the UK. People in Scotland know that I and the SNP and the Scottish Government don't propose cuts. We want to grow our economy so that we can protect Scotland from Labour and Tory cuts. The only people proposing cuts are the Tories, the Liberals and the Labour Party. We know that they want to impose more cuts on Scotland and the only way to stop that is to send SNP MPs to Westminster to force them into an alternative. Ruth Davidson to ask the First Minister when she will next meet the Prime Minister. I've no current plans to meet the Prime Minister unless, of course, he finds the backbone to join the TV leaders debate on 2 April. I'm pleased, as we've all heard the announcement in just the last hour, that all of the four main party leaders in here have agreed to an STV debate just a month before the election. Can I ask the First Minister about a recent speech of hers where she said that she wanted Britain to borrow an extra £180 billion, landing the UK even deeper in the red? Yesterday, my colleague Gavin Brown asked the Deputy First Minister when, under the SNP's plans, Britain would have finally eliminated the deficit. The Deputy First Minister replied and I quote, much later. So can I ask the First Minister to be more specific? How much later? In which year, under her plans, would the UK no longer be in deficit? It's no secret that I take a very, very different approach on austerity to Ruth Davidson and her colleagues. Under the plans that we have published that would see modest increases in public spending, modest increases that would help us to invest in skills, infrastructure and innovation, invest more in our public services, invest to protect the vulnerable that her party's policies are hitting so hard. Under those plans, debt and deficit, as a share of our national income, would reduce every year over the next Parliament. I do not pretend otherwise that I argue for a slower debt and deficit reduction than the Tories do, because I want an alternative to austerity. I don't want the cuts that Tories are proposing to go on harming the most vulnerable and harming our public services. That's the difference between us. Ruth Davidson said, it was a pretty long answer, but I only asked for a short one, just one year. That's all I asked for, but it's clear the SNP haven't a clue, so they have no answer about their own plans for Britain. So let me ask the First Minister about her plan for Scotland, because yesterday she was quoted as saying, short of independence, I believe we should have full fiscal autonomy. In response to yesterday's GERS figures and to that statement, the Impartial Institute for Fiscal Studies said that this would result in, and I quote again, substantial spending cuts or tax rises in Scotland, tax rises equaling 15 pence to income tax for every earner in Scotland. In the past, Presiding Officer, I repeatedly asked the First Minister's predecessor to give a detailed rebuttal to IFS projections, but he never did. So I am asking this First Minister, can she tell us now in this chamber why the IFS is wrong? Let's look in detail at the IFS report from yesterday that Ruth Davidson talks about. What she has quoted was predicated on Scotland being fiscally autonomous in 2015-16. For Ruth Davidson's information, 2015-16 starts in two and a half weeks time. We are not going to have fiscal autonomy then, but perhaps more fundamentally. If Ruth Davidson had had the honesty to complete the IFS sentence about tax rises or spending cuts, she'd find it says this and I quote, Unless credible policies to boost growth of Scotland's onshore economy and revenues are developed. That's the whole point. We have a choice. We can accept never ending Westminster cuts from the Tories, the Liberals and Labour, or we can take more control of our own finances and we can build a better future for this country. I know what side I stand on. John Mason. Given that it is Commonwealth week, can the First Minister affirm the Government's commitment to the Commonwealth legacy in my constituency and the rest of the east end of Glasgow, and would she welcome the Auditor General's report on the successful management of the games? As today's Audit Scotland report shows, Glasgow 2014 was a spectacular success, delivered under budget and we are firmly committed to securing a lasting social, cultural and economic legacy from the games for the east end of Glasgow and indeed for the whole of the country. At the heart of the success is the transformation that we have seen in the east end of Glasgow, world class sporting facilities and venues, new community facilities, improved infrastructure and an award winning housing development at the athlete's village. I saw that for myself recently. Today, we have announced £600,000 funding for Clyde Gateway to ensure that the legacy continues, helping more communities across the east end by providing training and employment opportunities and by encouraging people to get more active. I would hope that everybody across the chamber would welcome that and take this opportunity to again congratulate everybody associated with the success of Glasgow 2014. Dundee's last independent mid-sized builder, Muirfield, has applied to the court for the appointment of an administrator. What can the Scottish Government do to support the 250 people whose jobs are under threat? And what does the First Minister think about the economic situation where we are seeing local firms of this size and importance in our communities unable to survive? Jenny Marra raises an important issue and we have to do everything we can to protect local companies. In the particular case, she cites that the Government will of course be in contact, pace arrangements will be in place and we will be in dialogue with Dundee City Council. Of course there is going to be a huge construction boost to the city of Dundee through the V&E and we should all welcome that but we should also make sure that we are doing everything we can to support smaller businesses as we recover from the recession. To ask the First Minister what issues will be discussed at the next meeting of the cabinet. First Minister, what is the importance to the people of Scotland? On Monday the First Minister was wrong on her plan to borrow £180 billion. She said that debt would go down but yesterday John Swinney admitted that it will go up. Her whole Government was wrong to base its plans on an oil boom. Yesterday's GERS figures were the final devastating blow to her economics. When she gets so much wrong, what economic plan does she have left? I would have thought that money might have been the last subject that the Liberal Democrats wanted to talk about today. I think that we have had an interesting insight into how they deal with the indebtedness of their own party today. On the specific question that Willie Rennie raises, I absolutely stand by what I said about the opportunity for £180 billion additional spending, modest increases in spending but not 0.5 per cent a year in real terms. I think that that is preferable to the painful cuts that the Tories and the Liberals are imposing. Even if I am being very charitable and I am accepting in full the Treasury methodology in the paper that they published this week, in order to get debt reducing in every year and to be lower at the end of the Parliament, you could still spend £165 billion. I am happy to compromise with Willie Rennie if he is happy for extra spending as long as we can get debt reducing. Why do not we settle in £165 billion? Willie Rennie needs to come clean about what she claims. She said that debt would go down as a proportion of GDP and it is going up. John Swinney admitted yesterday that she should have the courage to admit it as well. The UK economic record is sound. Let us just remember that record high employment wages outstripping inflation, the highest growth in the G7 and the prospect of balancing the books so that we do not have to borrow to pay for day-to-day services. That is the economics that she said would not work. Her plan adds £4.7 billion worth of debt interest to the books. That is 180 secondary schools not being built every year because we have to pay her debts. How is that fair to future generations? Let me go back to the start of Willie Rennie's question. There is certainly somebody who needs to come clean today in politics but it is nobody on these benches. Willie Rennie also says that the policy of the Tory Liberal government is working. The policies of the Tory and Liberal Westminster government are hitting the 10 per cent poorest in our country hardest. If Willie Rennie is proud of that, that is his prerogative, but if that is what the Liberal Democrats have come to stand for, no wonder people cannot wait to give them a complete doing at the ballot box on May 7. I think people, today watching this session of First Minister's questions will have come to a very clear conclusion. If you want cuts, then you can vote for any one of the Tories, the Liberals or Labour, but if you want a clear and principled alternative to austerity, the only way to get it is to vote SNP. To ask the First Minister what the impact on rural businesses and communities will be of Royal Mail's decision to reduce collection times at 3,300 Scottish postboxes. I am concerned about any decisions that would have an adverse impact on Scotland's rural businesses and communities. The UK Government mishandled the unwanted sale of Royal Mail. It must now ensure that a privatised Royal Mail provides a service that suits Scotland's needs, in particular the vital service to our remote and rural communities. I thank the First Minister for her answer. Does she agree that the inevitable job losses among postal workers in the effect that reduced services will bring is a negation of the spirit if not the letter of the universal service obligation? Does that not show the detrimental impact that the privatisation of Royal Mail is having? The Government opposed the privatisation of the Royal Mail. The sale-off is inevitably leading to concerns over the Royal Mail's ability to deliver the universal service obligation. Any job losses are to be deeply regretted and, of course, will make it more challenging for Royal Mail to meet its obligations. The report from the House of Commons Business Innovation and Skills Committee about competition in the postal sector and the universal service obligation recognises that market conditions are changing rapidly. Off-com, the postal regulator must ensure that it closely monitors the situation in Scotland and responds quickly if needed. The vital lifeline for many of Scotland's communities absolutely must be protected. Kenneth Gibson is absolutely right that this has been caused by the privatisation, but this specific problem has also been driven by off-com. Will the First Minister ask off-com to insist that later collections should be protected and will she support the CWU, the trade union, in asking Royal Mail to provide better information to customers about collection times? I am certainly very happy to communicate that view and to support the general concerns that Hugh Henry has expressed. I hope that we can get a degree of consensus in this chamber that some of the changes that we are seeing pose a risk to some of our communities and that it is absolutely essential that we do everything that we can to protect the lifeline service that so many of our communities rely on. To ask the First Minister what support the Scottish Government is giving the poorest university students. One of the Government's proudest achievements is the restoration of free higher education. In addition to free tuition, our minimum income guarantee provides students from the poorest households with £7,500 of living cost support every year. The support has helped to ensure that record levels of 18-year-olds from the most disadvantaged areas are being accepted to university, but we recognise and I believe strongly that we must do much more. That is why I announced in the programme for government that we will form a commission on widening access to advise on the clear milestones we must meet to ensure that every child has the same chance of going to university and what practical measures we need to take to ensure that we achieve that ambition. The fact of the matter is that this Government in recent years has systematically cut maintenance grants for these students. In fact, such students in Scotland now receive a maximum of £1,750. Students in England in their position would receive twice that. In Northern Ireland, they would receive twice that. In Wales, they would receive three times that level of grant support. Apart from Iceland, where there are no maintenance grants, every single country in Western Europe provides more support for poorer students than Scotland does. The First Minister has talked a lot about hypothetical cuts today. This is a real cut. Will she reverse it as Labour has promised to do? Of course, the students in England that Ian Gray refers to pay tuition fees. Students in Scotland do not pay tuition fees. For students living at home, our minimum income guarantee of £7,500 a year for students from the poorest background is the highest in the UK. I agree that we need to do more. I would hope that Ian Gray and I could accept that we perhaps agree on this. I think that we have to do more to support students from the most disadvantaged parts of our country, Access University, if that is what they want to do. That is why I have already announced the intention to set up the widening access commission. I think that people should be cautious about believing a word that Labour says when it comes to student support. After all, it was Labour in 1997 in the election who said that it would not introduce tuition fees, who after the election did introduce tuition fees. It was Labour who in the 2001 election said that it would not introduce top-up tuition fees, who then after the election did introduce top-up tuition fees. I stand by this Government's record on student support. We will continue to take action to improve it, but I do not think that people will believe a word that Labour says when it comes to students. NUS Scotland described the Scottish Government's package of student support as the best support package in the whole of the United Kingdom. Does the First Minister agree with me that it is a bit rich for parties that were pro-tuition fees to now try to rebrand themselves as parties for the students? As I have just said, I do not think that people can believe a word that Labour says. Labour has consistently broken their promises when it comes to tuition fees. I know that they do not like hearing this, but they fought the 1997 election on a no fees promise. They broke that promise. They fought the 2001 election on a no top-up fees promise. I heard somebody shout earlier on what about in Scotland when they came to office in the Scottish Parliament. They moved tuition fees from the front door to the back door, but they still imposed tuition fees. You cannot trust Labour on student support. You can trust the SNP because we abolished tuition fees. John Scott. The First Minister will be aware of the high drop-out rate of students at Scottish universities, particularly at the University of the West of Scotland. What help could the Scottish Government give to both students and universities to help to address this difficult, sensitive and complex problem? It is a difficult and complex problem, but it is also an important issue for us to challenge. One of the issues that I want the widening access commission to look at is not just how we support and encourage more students from the poorest backgrounds to access university, but how we support them to carry on through their university courses and complete those courses into graduate. I will be very keen as the widening access commission is set up and develops to share our thinking on that with members across the chamber. I am absolutely determined that we do everything that we can to make sure that every young person in Scotland has an equal chance of going to university and completing their university education. I hope that it is something that all of us across the chamber, regardless of our party background, can come together and support. Leah MacArthur. In the recent budget negotiations, the Scottish Liberal Democrats urged the Deputy First Minister to increase the earnings threshold for repaying student loans from just under £17,000 to £21,000, as in the rest of the UK. That would save young graduates £368 a year. It is also something that the Government could do immediately with no impact on their budget. The First Minister says that she wants to do more, so will she explain why her deputy rejected that move? We are and will continue to consider those issues. I do believe that, although the differential threshold that Leah MacArthur refers to is in place, students, when they pay back their loans, pay them back at a lower rate of interest in order to compensate for that. Nevertheless, Leah MacArthur has raised that before. I think that he raises a legitimate issue, and it is one that the Government will continue to consider. To ask the First Minister what assistance the Scottish Government provides to cancer patients for day-to-day tasks. The Government recognises that there are physical, financial and often emotional consequences associated with a cancer diagnosis, which is why our cancer action plan, Better Cancer Care, gives focus to supporting people living both with and beyond cancer. We work with a number of support organisations such as Macmillan to ensure that cancer patients are getting advice on the benefits and support that they are entitled to. Lord Campbell. Thank the First Minister for that answer. She may be aware of the Macmillan cancer research recent research paper hidden at home, which revealed that half of cancer patients throughout the UK who have support or personal care needs only receive care from friends and family. What more can the Scottish Government do to provide support to those patients and indeed their carers? Anybody who has read the recent hidden at home Macmillan report will recognise that supporting cancer patients outwith and beyond their clinical treatment is absolutely essential in ensuring that they get the best possible care and the best possible outcomes. That is why we are working with Macmillan cancer support to take forward the transforming care after treatment programme. That programme is an excellent example of the third sector and Scottish Government working together to improve how care is delivered for people following a diagnosis of cancer. The First Minister will be aware that the report highlights that council cuts are impacting on people with cancer and indeed with other long-term conditions. Will she make it a priority to look at the services that are delivered to those people to make sure they are in place to support them?  That is one of the many reasons that we are working to integrate health and social care services so that there is a genuinely joined up approach to care. I think that in Scotland we should be very proud of the cancer treatment and care that we provide for patients, but I, when I was health secretary, saw very, very regularly for myself how difficult it is for patients diagnosed with cancer, not just to get through their treatment and the clinical part of their care, but to cope with all of the other consequences, whether they be financial or work-related or emotional, and we have a duty to make sure that we are providing adequate support across all of these issues. Thank you. That ends First Minister's questions. We are now deployed to Forder James Kelly. Forder, let me hear Mr Kelly. Thank you Presiding Officer. I know that during exchanges between the First Minister and Kezia Dugdale in relation to last week's debate in the House of Commons, the First Minister stated that the SNP voted against that motion when in actual fact they abstained. Can I therefore? In order that the records are accurate, can I ask that the First Minister acknowledge her inaccuracy and have the record corrected during this session? Mr Kelly, you have made your point.


Today, we're going to talk about squatting deep and how to get there. I want to tell you a story. So I had a client who's doing this exercise that she got from her physical therapist, a really good physical therapist that I know in San Francisco. If you need one, let me know. His name is Joseph Sinelli. You got to look him up. Okay. So he's doing this rocking and rolling exercise where so she lays on her back and she grabs her legs and she rocks like this and then rocks like back. Okay. So that's like level one. And then what she progressed to was coming up into a squat and then coming back down. What she was finding was when she caught herself in her squat, she wasn't able to prevent this from happening. She had to catch herself like this and then come back up. So she would start here with her feet here and she would end here with her feet here and her knees in. So what that is to me, that's telling me that she doesn't have a way to squat really deeply. So I want to talk you through what we did with her. Instead of trying to force her into the right position at the bottom, we're going to start from the top down. Okay. When the knees collapse in and when the weight shifts forward, all of this stuff happens together. And the big thing I want you to notice is what happens here in this gray area here, this t-shirt of mine. So this skeleton, your back extends up like this and that steals your mobility from every joint in your body all the way, you know, you're looking at the spine, right? It's the spine. It steals spine motion. Yes, it does. But it also steals motion from your big toe because everything is connected. Okay. So if she can't maintain this spinal position, she's never going to be able to do it. And if she can't maintain her hip position from doing the same thing, she's not going to be able to get that low squat. So we're going to start from the top down and get this gray stuff to be better. So what we start with is just a normal squat. I say exhale, get the air out of the way and tuck your hips. So just like this, I'm not like an armadillo, my butt's not arching out way back, I'm somewhere in the middle. Okay. So we start there. Okay. I got my position and then we're just going to come down pretty slowly. I'm going to have a little bit of a narrower stance than I might for a performance type of squat and come on down really slowly. Again, this isn't a performance type squat, right? We're not trying to go fast, we're just trying to demonstrate our mobility and we're trying to find that mobility. So I'm coming down, still got the air out and I can just keep going until I run out of room. Now I won't run out of room because I'm super flexible and I don't mean that as a compliment. For her, she ran out of room right about here and then you saw her butt stick way out and she couldn't hold it and she couldn't load her legs anymore and she started to hold her breath and when she gave up, okay? So that's a good area for her to stop. So what I did next is I said, let's set up the exact same way and we're going to get there and we're going to stop and I just want you to hold, take a breath, get comfortable and then come back up. So it looks like this. She might be here. Now she's here and she comes down and she feels herself losing it. She says, hold right here. Now you can hold there for a number of breaths or you can go back to that spot for a number of reps, but that's a good way to start working yourself down into deeper and deeper squats. If you can't do it that way, you shouldn't be able to do it this way, right? You shouldn't be able to do it under heavy, heavy loads. As long as you're not some advanced athlete and we can talk about that some other time.


Hi everyone, Joe for JaspeysCaseBreaks.com here, coming at you with 2019, Panini Passing the Torch Football One Box Random Team Break Number One. Is this 2019? Yeah, I think this is the only pass in the torch we have. Yeah, right here. This is the Random Team Break Number One. We're gonna do the break itself first and then at the end, with a different dice, we'll re-randomize everybody's names. In the top six, we'll get into that Optic Team All Break. It's a full case. Optic Team All Break, full case of that. But first, the break. Big thanks to this group of people for getting this filler going. Remember, always check the break schedule. If you scroll down, you'll be able to see what fillers we need to accomplish to unlock certain breaks. Always keep that resource handy. That's always pinned in the chat as well. So for the break, two out of six, eight times are names and teams. One, two, three. And eighth and final time. Eight times for the teams. And eighth and final time, right? Two out of six, eight times. There's eight times right there. All right, so not gonna read off all the names here, but here's the first half of the list right there. And there's the second half of the list right here. And let's just print this out. And let's just rip and see what we got. Passing the torch is actually pretty decent box for a filler. I feel like you can get some cool stuff out of here. All right, so here's the final print out here. Thanks everybody. Good luck in the randomizer at the end. Three autographs per box. The three autographs are in the middle. So we got Tyra Williams. Raiders to 35. That'll be for Jason. Another Raider. Jerry Rice Raider Edition on top there. And then we've got a dual autograph. Wow. Benny Snell Jr. And James Conner, eight out of 15. Who's got Pittsburgh? That's gonna be for Kobe Chan with the Steelers. Behind Jerry Rice is another autograph. That's gonna be, there you go. It's Carly Kult. Torchmarks, 17 out of 50. Old Euler, of course goes to the Titans now. Howard. And the last one behind Jerry Rice is Miles Boykin for the Ravens. Apprentice, Inc. 59 out of 99. That rookie autograph going to John. And the Purplebirds. And here's another Raider receiver right there for Jason. All right. So a few nice autographs there. Now let's grab everybody's name from Sean down to Kobe. There's some new dice. There's a new list. Let's roll it and randomize that list six and a one seven times. Top six after seven will be in that team all break. One, two, three, four, five, six. And good luck everybody, seventh and final time. Now from seven on down, that's gonna be sad times. Howard, very close. But sad times for Howard and everybody else here. Thanks for giving this a shot though. Top six, congrats to you though, happy times. It's gonna be Phil, Kobe, Barry, Oliver, Jonathan and Matthew Shearer. Happy times for the top six. You're in that full case team all break, which should go off a little bit later tonight. Just gotta do one more of those fillers, sell a couple spots and then we'll be done. I'm Joe, I'll see you next time for that one. Bye-bye.


Hi guys, fast the morning, filling up my list, reading, finding an investment that 90%, 99% of viewers probably could not invest due to brokerage limits, which is something very important and a topic that we will discuss in depth because buying something that requires effort, which means nobody else can buy it, is probably similarly as buying something that nobody wants to buy. So very interesting topic I'll update you later. I have to write a report, see whether I can buy things there, whether it pays to go deeper into the research, but I'll still do the research. Just a comment on my bike. John Templeton used to do after work, after lunch, walks of one to three hours to think to settle his thoughts. I do bike rides two, three, four times a week, especially if there is nice weather and it really helps me to structure all the research. If you look again at my list, it's so much data. I have read probably today I went through about 300 investor relationship presentation slides from various companies, which means, okay, there is a lot to systematize, to boil down and this is just day two of the paper research, so we'll see well where it ends up. By the way, renewable energy is spinning, energy is produced, so all is well. See you later with future updates. So I continued with the research going through my list. One of the very interesting stocks I found is Meyer Melnhoff, an Austrian producer and this is what happens when you have a good company, good company, stable company, not doing crazy things, even doesn't have even that now and they can simply grow. They have a 40% payout, so they grow their dividends, they grow their earnings and that's it.  So what? This is a triple over 20 years, dividend yield 3%, so that's 6% plus 3%, that's 9%. So if you want good returns, you can chase these kind of companies and you will probably get your 8, 9, 10% per year over 10, 20 years, which is a great investment. However, good price, well-priced, okay price, price of energy ratio of 14, however, I have looked at other companies and Finnish companies, paper companies, that are integrated, this is the difference between many US companies, Canadian companies, especially those don't own the land, own land, own hectares, produce, pulp, produce their prime materials, so they have high margins as they don't depend that much on pulp prices and inputs. Further, they're also investing, replicating their technology in Uruguay, which is something that maybe is in a competition with the Brazilian investments that I have been looking, but the Finnish companies, a few of them, I'll show you later on the list, look good again, net debt to EBITDA 0, so no crazy things, they take that, deleverage quickly, grow from that, so looks interesting and even the current cash flow yield is 9%, so if they can continue growing like that, we are already at double digits returns. Then just something funny from the research, Westbond, another paper company or something from Canada that simply gets you on your list, but if you go to their investor's info, it says how it was featured in the buy low, sell high, small cap Canadian stock review in October 2002, I don't know what happened since then, but not much good, just fun on what you can still find online. Look at the magazine, pulp and paper shows a lot of positivity in the sector, takeovers, new production, acquisitions, the expanding output, so that means okay, it is a cyclical sector, not many companies have modes, I'm looking for those and that's why I will be looking deeper into the Finnish, Brazilian, Uruguay place and not many have modes, thus it is practically certain that there will be significant ups and downs and going back to the list, so I'll look a little bit deeper into those stocks, also Portuguese stocks look interesting as they have finished their investment cycle, so some very very interesting things and as I have let's say finished my research on the sector, now it's time to dig deeper into a few stocks, clubbing definitely the Finnish producers, perhaps the Portuguese, the Nine Dragon from China definitely and then see okay, what is the stock that I might want to follow over the next decade because as it is cyclical, it's very important to buy when it's really really cheap and I'm not in a rush, if the trend is there, if it is positive, I might buy something in 2023 and still make a lot of money on a low risk high reward cyclical stock, so that's the process, that's what I constantly do, I'm looking for stocks to add to my watch list and if it's already cheap, like it sometimes happens, I buy immediately, so I still have a lot to do today, still have a lot of time, did already a lot of reading but next what you can expect, I don't know if I will be able to do it but you can expect some stock research reports on these different companies from Finland, Portugal, Brazil that are definitely cheaper than the American counterparts, which means okay, if you look elsewhere in the world, you will find cheaper, better investments. Thank you for listening and watching, see you tomorrow probably with a stock analysis of some interesting global stocks.