death, I'm saying you're back and you're worth the skill in training these jobs and the government has to help more and the private sector and everybody together. We've got a lot of people that we need a lot of help and we need from everybody. Just did. This is Betty Walls. Most of her process is students and they have mastered the equipment. She's working on a 50-page document and she's moving paragraphs from page 2 to page 38. She's working on a 50-page project and a document that she has and she's updating that map on where I'll tell you, I'll take you in my glass any time. President, these ladies start from the beginning and now all of them have been placed on jobs and will be starting work soon, am I right? And they're on their way. All they need is some money and some help to prove what they can do. Isn't that right? A thousand, thousand, thousand times. Mr. President, do programs like this need some federal money as well to get going? Yes, and this is what we met last night and what I was talking about. The using of federal funds in collaboration with the private sector with the community and all and what our job training program is all about. Aiming it at areas and aiming it for the jobs that are available and open those areas and Boston has become one of the centers of high technology. You won't be seeking to cut any of this What? You won't be seeking to cut any of this when you freeze them. No, what we originally cut was CETA but that was more than made up by the private sector and our own job training program where we think it is superior to CETA is that out of CETA on the whole only about 18 cents out of the dollar actually went to training and our one job program that has already passed we figured that more than 70 cents out of every dollar is going to go into training and so what we've been trying to do is make a change into what we think are more efficient ways to get the job done. Mr. President, some of the officials here and the digital plants complain that because of the cuts in things like government development grants and investment bonds that they don't have the resources before you came in? Well, there is one group that had a grant has the grant still except that it has never been able to get a client for the building that it wanted to put up here in one of the centers and under the law as it was passed and long before we got there there comes a time if they cannot produce a client in which then that grant is withdrawn. I don't know what the status of it is right now. It has not been withdrawn as yet. Mr. President, as you know you're in an area of high unemployment for those who may not have seen the speech last night what can you tell those unemployed people in this particular area, not as a building but in the surrounding neighborhood? What I said last night and apparently in a poll taken after the speech a great majority of the people believed that we are on the mend. It is true that in all the recessions we've ever had the last thing that improves is unemployment. We have a different situation than maybe some of the previous or earlier recessions this has been coming on for some time it isn't unique to this particular period but we have an unemployment situation that is only part recession if the recession were ended tomorrow we would find that in this country there is a need for just what we're seeing here for retraining because we're in a great transition period. There are some people that will never go back to the jobs they had but those jobs will no longer exist but there will be new jobs and all of you seem to take it the wrong way when I say it but again let me refer to any Sunday metropolitan newspaper and peruse the help-wanted ads when I say that you distorted as somewhat you've indicated that I'm trying to say that there are people who don't want work no it isn't that at all if you look at them here in a time of great unemployment our employers looking for people to work and the reason those ads are there is because we still have not met the problem of training people for the job skills that need to be filled that they're advertising for in the last two years some 3 million new people entered the job market there weren't people laid off from other jobs they are newcomers to the job market and we have not been producing at the rate we should the new jobs to take care of that upsurge right here I've just been handed a message from the computer the date and then good afternoon Mr. President welcome to the high technology training center America is on the mend Americans can still pull together for the common good that's in quotation I shall thank you very much we can and we're going to there are no more questions I'm sorry Sam that's enough please well as I said last night we know it hasn't been easy ever since we've been there they're going to be legitimate differences of opinion we're going to continue to work with them and as I said in a bipartisan way I was quite heartened by that film they made some weeks ago that they ran right after my speech because they didn't know what I was going to say in the speech but they said all the same things in their film that they I'd already said in the speech that I wanted so maybe we're going to get along all right I've said to the president that we unemployment is vast and high in our cities we have hundreds of thousands of people in unemployment lines and on street corners all this country we need jobs and we need training and we're looking to the government and to the president to help us get that job done and the private sector started a project of this kind on his own one man starting it and it is spreading all over the country and you've just heard these young ladies here are already placed in positions now as a result of this training and congratulations we'd like to keep those programs so that other disbanded people may be able to and we're going to expand not cut them, expand them to help our people no what's going on with the president of the state of the union about jobs always listen and then wait and see sir sir is it true that you won't let Mr. Bagan come here until he withdraws from Levenon the story that you won't set a date for Sam there's an answer to that question but I'm not going to take it now because I'm going to go to talk about computers and young people and jobs today I've seen a yes and no sir we go to the try to get some pictures of them where I'm standing you see the president on the other side of a stack of bottles sir sir stop for a second stop for a second thank you very much I can assure you that your announcement of establishing a position was very exciting. ABC, the health companies of this company are more than welcome. President, I thank you so much for accepting my invitation. And it was so gracious to be here at MediCorps today.


And here, this is a very special TV and hi, so who are you? I'm Paul Gray, I'm research director at IHS Market and I lead our TV research. So is this cool? It's fun, this is really fun. So what we've seen in the past couple of years is that OLED has managed to get recognised by consumers especially in Western Europe as being the premium TV technology. I'll emphasise that often what is the best technology depends on when you're looking at it. If you're watching in a bright room then probably LCD has an advantage. If you watch in the dark then OLED has an advantage. But one of the things that TV brands have been trying to do is to make products that bridge that gap so that they're not different and one of the things that we're really seeing at the moment is lots of new ideas with LCD TV to improve that contrast performance and get those really, really deep blacks that we all enjoy with OLED. So here we see 8K and here is the 4K ULT-XD. It's kind of like the pre-mode dual cell demo right now, no? Right, that's right. So one of the things that you can do with LCD is to go to modulate and control the light that's coming through to the LCD panel. All LCD panels leak a little bit of light and by putting an extra panel behind it then you can reduce the amount of light that leaks out and so you get a better black. So to prevent the light leaking and how close does it get to pixel dimming which is one of the selling points of the OLED? OK, so the idea with OLED and the key thing that OLED has is that you can just light up one single pixel in the whole display for example should you want to. And that hasn't been possible with LCD without a little bit of a halo. What they've done instead is they've put a panel with 1080p resolution behind it and you use that to control the backlight and obviously you can still have dimming zones but you have millions of dimming zones and that's the principle behind it. Pretty much 2 million dimming zones, right? Yeah, that's right. 1,920 by 1,080, so let's call it 2 million. And somehow it's black and white, it's this second layer, the second cell is the backlight. So you've got a backlight, then you have the control layer and then in front of that you have the conventional LCD that we all know and love so well. And the point is that you're then reducing any light that goes to the switched off pixels and because of that you end up with deeper blacks and the leakage is less. And that layer doesn't leak anything. It leaks far, far less. Yeah, it's like another LCD layer. So each time, so if you say that 1,000th of the light leaks through, then you add a second one on top of that and that means that it's a millionth of the light leaks through. So that's what they mean by a million dimming zones, even though it's 2 million pixels behind but it's about leaking. So the key issue on this one is the amount of light that leaks out. So have you looked at this, what do you think? What do you think of this 8K dual cell? What you see is the really deep blacks and that really intense contrast that looks just like an OLED. And it's got that real OLED-like performance that you can have bright white text for example when you're running the credits on a movie on a black screen and you don't see that gray halo around it very noticeable. So potentially this can lower price, potentially because the 88 inch 8K is not 88,000 dollars but it's half of 88,000 dollars, it's 40,000 something. This could potentially be less than 5,000. I don't know on the prices and costs. On all LCD panels in particular then it always depends on supply and demand and the crunch one is that an LCD panel fab is like running an oil refinery. You make money when it's full, if it's not full then you run the risk of losing money and anything that you can do to make sure that your fab is full puts you in profit. Now at the moment the industry in China has structurally over-invested in LCD capacity. About 20% of it is not being used. Suddenly you've got a technology where almost that extra cell comes at very very low cost because otherwise it would be doing nothing. And so it's an interesting way for the LCD industry to use oversupply productively to improve product performance. Of course it depends on cost. And this is now where the engineers are going to start getting really clever and seeing how they can do that. So for example one way that they may do it is that at the moment you've got two cells each of which has two layers of glass and LCD in between. And maybe you make something more like a club sandwich where you have three sheets of glass and two layers of LCD in between them. So there's lots of room for imagination from engineers and creativity. So this a lot of action happening right there, it can be just over here. I think this one looks also and as far as I understand this one is on the market in China already and is selling for 20,000 RMB. So that's like 2,500 or something like that. It's not really half the price of an OLED but potentially it can go down. I don't know about the margin structure on that one and of course it's a very early product. It's a very early product. They've only made a few thousand and therefore costs aren't going to be optimal. And I think everybody at the moment is evaluating what the market reception is to it. How consumers view these things. Do they just want OLED for the sake of having OLED? Or is there something different going on there? So at the moment it's a very new product. It's rather experimental. However it offers another good example about how LCD is such a versatile system and you can really reinvent the different parts of it and squeeze all kinds of different performance out of it. This is the OLED without the XD single layer and it's the top of the class. I don't think they're trying to trick it or something. And just with my camera I can clearly see the difference in black levels is just more black here. It's totally black which is kind of like the selling point of the OLED. That's right. So the main thing that OLED has always excelled at is if you watch in the dark then the blacks are black and as a result you don't get that rather gray, leaky black level. And how about Nanosys is market leader for Quantum Dot, right? And there's a whole bunch of Nanosys stuff in there. There's the Quantum Dots. How does the quality of the colors get better with this OLED XD? So in the end on Quantum Dots then they allow you to have very, very pure colors. If you have a leaky panel then the purity of that color is degraded by the leakage. So going to a panel with a dual cell allows you to get that extreme color purity which of course is what you always see with OLED. So this is exciting in terms of colors. It's exciting in terms of contrast. They are talking about a 150,000 contrast ratio. What is OLED talking about in contrast ratio? I think the answer is that it's broadly comparable. Nobody can achieve a million to one contrast ratio because actually the light reflecting off your face back onto the screen will degrade the black level. So over 100,000 I think at that stage you can say that we take it off the we take it off the table and it then depends on things like the room conditions like are you sitting in a room with a white wall? So when I did the interview with Hisense at Display Week I think he was mentioning about it getting up to dual 4K but you don't think it's necessary? The risk when you go and add the same resolution is that first of all you've got to make sure that the two cells match exactly. Otherwise you start seeing that the black stripes in between them overlap each other and you get a reduction in the light coming through the panel. How did they align? That's their secret source in the process. So I think on this one this is about returns to scale. So what one do you get most benefit for least cost? And that's the best value and whether going all the way down to a single pixel is necessary I think is very debatable. In the end put the two next to each other, put on your content and see whether you can see a difference. If you can see the difference then think about how much it's worth to you. If you can't see a difference don't pay for it like all these things. As far as I understand the 8K demo which maybe is the first time they show is more or less the same NITs. I think they had one last year. They had 8K dual cell. I think they had not dual cell no. Dual cell but more or less the same NITs potentially as an OLED but this one is supposed to have twice the NITs. It's important to have more NITs. Yes it is but at the same time you've got to remember the energy consumption. So that's a warm screen. An 8K screen has 35% less transmissivity in its glass compared to a 4K screen because you've got to have all the conductors and things to connect the transistors up and you've got to have the black layers in between the pixels. And therefore 8K screens are less efficient than 4K. If you go and look at some of the energy performance of 8K screens they're using a lot of power. So 65 inches of 500 watts is getting very very close to the legal limit of what you can have on a TV in Europe. So 8K has an energy consumption problem and the ways that people can use to reduce the energy consumption are going to be critical. Is there something to do so if you do an 8K with LCD technology you're losing four times their brightness or two times or something like that but in OLED there's no lose and loss but they're limited to their... No I mean on OLED you have other problems related to things like screen loading and so on so very definitely you can't do resolution for free. Emissive technologies typically have more problems with fine pixel structures than LCD because the energy has to be transported through those pixels and out whereas in LCD of course it's just a switch. All I think is clear at the moment is that 8K is another step again that's worse on efficiency and that's a major problem. So I think this looks really amazing. It looks like potentially this is the best LCD in the market right now. But there's other stuff happening. There's other dual layers. So I know of at least three brands that have got dual layer that they've shown publicly. I'm sure some other ones have them in their private areas that they've been showing to dealers and industry insiders which obviously I can't talk about. At the same time people are also looking at other ways to solve this problem. So another way to do it is you put in literally thousands and thousands of LEDs and the micro and mini LED technology allows you again to have backlights with many, many, many zones. Not 255 like we're seeing at the moment. But maybe 2000, 10,000 zones. And again, it gets you to that point that you really minimize the amount of light that gets wasted in the back of the panel. So what's going to be best? Dual layer or mini LED? Don't know. Let's wait and see. Dimming. I really have no idea. I think the creativity of the engineers and how people design these things and the optical components they put in will be critical at the moment. I wouldn't want to call it in the end. It doesn't matter what the spec says, what matters is what it looks like. And often creating a product that is very well balanced is more important than doing one thing well. So the ones that are publicly announced that are doing dual layer that's showing stuff, is it a company like? So so as an example, then Panasonic's doing an interesting one, which is dual layer with OLED and it's to be transparent. And then you can switch the LCD on in the back to give you a good black level. So I think we're really at an early stage. The products that we see at the moment in dual layer are really only prototypes. A few of them have been test marketed, but it's a very immature technology that the ideas are really just beginning on this one. So they're combining a transparent OLED with LCD? Transparent OLED with an LCD behind it. What's the point in doing? The problem with a transparent display is it's like projection, is that the black level is only ever as black as the ambient lighting condition. And so where people have done transparent OLED displays, they look rather fun, but it's a gray and white display. The black level is always very washed out. So to return that black, which is of the unactivated screen, then they put an LCD at the back of it. It's a prototype, but it's a fun idea. And again, it's something interesting to look at. It probably would be more expensive than just an OLED. Oh, yeah. Because you get an OLED and an LCD, you have to align them and everything. There's a lot more components in there. You probably only need a single cell on the LCD, because it's only going to be black and white. But we'll see. I think we're seeing, again, a lot more ideas that people are doing on this. And it just goes to show that evolution on LCD is really not finished. So is this also a single layer LCD in the back, because it's just a black and white 1080p in the back? Where's the single cell? I don't know. It's the answer. So I think that it's a 1080p panel. I'm just trying to talk about the second layer. I think a 1080p panel. So that for every four UHD pixels, you've got a single lighting box behind that. That only does black and white. Yeah, that's all you need. And it's the same LCD technology than the front layer, more or less. But it's like... Yeah, exactly.  Light switch. Yeah, this is what LCD is. It's a switch. Yeah, it turns the light on and off. So if we jump over just over here, here are high sensors showing something else. They're showing a chip that they have right here. Because my understanding over the past years, we also did a couple other interviews, is that sometimes high sensors or other companies, they have panels that might be from Samsung or from LG or some kind of that. Or they could be from BOE or others. And sometimes the main difference is the processing between the different brands. So the TV video processor chip is much forgotten. I think most enthusiasts get very, very, very bothered about the make of panel. And they forget about the video processing. Now, everybody in OLED is using the same display. There may be some very slight detail differences, but it's basically the same OLED panel from LG Display. However, if you put a Sony, a Philips, Panasonic, and everybody else, LG, of course, put their OLED TVs together, you line them all up, then they look different. They look really amazingly different. And that is down to the video processor inside it. So potentially Sony has a really sweet one. That's why some people say they have the best OLED. I think on all these things, it always goes by what you like. I think people emphasize different things. So some people want to make the image look very busy and very exciting. Some people want to make the image look very natural. Both are right and it's about taste. Is there any chance that company like Hisense or TCL or Skywars, which is over here, is it possible that their engines are apart with the other ones? I think there's an experience curve. This is a subjective business.  Just like music and what kind of stereo to buy or whatever, it depends on what you like. It's like saying, what's the best car in the world? Yeah, okay. A Ferrari Scuderia is a pretty great car, unless you want to take free bags of cement home from the builders. In which case, it's a pretty terrible car. And it's about what's appropriate for what you want. And I don't think that there's a case of what's the best TV. It's what's the right TV for you. And here, as you walk over here, there is... Here's some demos with Hisense showing Android TV. They also have their read-out. I'm thinking, why doesn't everybody just use Android TV and stop doing all these different... I think that's one of the saddest things about the smart TV whole thing, is that there's fragmentation. Everybody should use Android, but Google doesn't want to share the revenue. What's the problem? Right. And so this is the key one, is this about business models, first of all. I think the other one is that it turns out the value proposition of TV is watching TV. And a lot of things in interactivity and app stores and things like that are frankly irrelevant for TV. A TV is a shared device. If you want something personal, you keep it on your phone. If you want to order a pizza, you're going to do it with your phone. Why? Because that's got your bank details in it. Would I want my bank details inside the TV? No, because I've got 17-year-old children. Yeah, and I think that that makes them fundamentally different. Most people only watch a few channels, most people only use a few video apps, and the question is really whether Android TV is just totally over-specified for the task that is really demanded of it. So that's why, for example, I don't know if it's HiSense or maybe TCL Day using Roku in the US. Somehow it's preferred over there, it's simpler, or I don't know. Right. So Roku is a very, very simple user interface. It's extremely clear, it's easy to use, it's stable, it's simple, it does what it says on the packet. And that is very, very different from these over-complicated other systems. And I think this is always about creating something that is appropriate to the market. And Android TV is imagining that the phone is a 65-inch smartphone. Sorry, the TV is a 65-inch smartphone. The TV is not a 65-inch smartphone. You do something totally different with it. Most of the time with the TV, you're not interacting with it. You're just watching it. And so... Sure, but maybe this is... I don't know if the Android TV market is growing, I guess it probably is. But isn't it a little bit of a failure on Google's part? It's a huge company. Why can't they make something simple? Right. And I think one of the things is that Google is an internet company. Google expects products to change every couple of years to evolve very fast. And then you've got the TV, which most people keep for, say, six to eight years. A device that spends most of its time playing back, not being an interactive device like the phone. And therefore, it's something completely different. AI in a washing machine. How often do you want to talk to your washing machine? Well, not very often. Do you want to operate your washing machine remotely? No, because you've still got to put the clothes in and take them out. And so I think that often with Android, there's a misunderstanding of what people really want to use a TV for, and that they've put too many functions in, most of which aren't used. I think Google should have said from the beginning, 70 or 80% revenue share goes to the manufacturer. They don't need to like... I think they're scaring them off by, you know, wanting to control the future of all revenue. Right. When Google should just be making revenue on their advertising and stuff, they don't need to control the whole thing. Right. And I think the other issues on all this are, of course, personal data and privacy. And very, very definitely, TV set makers are somewhat concerned that Android TV is a bit of a trap. They remember what happened in OSs in PCs, where you just get relegated to being unable to control anything different about your hardware. And all the profits were just Microsoft and Intel. And all the manufacturers mean nothing. Yeah, it was a very, very tough business making PCs. Still is. If they're worried about that in TV, I'd argue it's happened already just between the hypercompetition between brands. But again, they see this as a kind of trap. Also in fairness, up until very recently, there hasn't been much choice in OS. Suddenly, in Europe, we're now getting Roku and Fire TV. We've never had those before. So there's only been one open OS. The US has been very, very different, very diverse world of OSes there. So I think this is introducing more competition into it. And Android TV is a complicated thing. And a lot of the time in the market, then the hardware cost just has not justified the extra functionality. I think this bad strategy, and hopefully they'll fix it, but what Android TV has kind of missed the thing, it created a place for Netflix and Amazon Prime to just dominate totally. Right. Because it's hard for a startup to start making an app that works in seven different smart TVs. Right. Well, the Netflix and Amazon works everywhere, but a startup cannot develop for seven platforms. And I talked to one company who was doing apps for TV, and they said that 75% of their R&D spend was just porting. So that's not the stuff that's creating new apps. It's not improving the apps. That's just making them work. That's a huge barrier to the success of smart TVs. It's a massive barrier to the success. The other problem with smart TVs is that this is a slow selling product by comparison with mobile phones. For every TV that gets shipped every year, then there's five phones. Then you split it up between brands and OSs, and you end up with very small quantities. It's also not a market that is homogeneous worldwide on a couple of mobile phone standards and things like that. You've got lots of local broadcast standards, people use and watch TV differently in every country. And so as a result, it's a very, very, very diverse market. I hope it gets better in this thing, because I think it's a little bit... I'm a little bit disappointed that there's a big happening. I think they should just go Android TV. But let's go over there one more. Over here, there is some interesting aspect ratio going on here. But this is kind of like just a demo, right? Do you think people are going to be buying this? This is, I think, the third time around. We've seen 21 by 9. Well, all broadcast content is 16 by 9. So for the rest of the time, you're going to be watching, you know, this is 105-inch TV. And so most of the rest of the time, you're going to have a 65-inch TV experience at a 105-inch cost. Even when you look at Hollywood content, then if you take the Blu-ray, yes, it has the black bars top and bottom, but you're then going to be stretching those remaining lines. And that's not going to be the same resolution as the panel. Yeah, so I don't think that it makes a great deal of sense. Most content is 16 by 9. There is, of course, the cup. But, okay, okay, this shortly is the DLP. I think it's cool, but it's different than... Excellent, I can't. Yeah, okay, cool. Okay, and then behind there is some other stuff, I guess, but this is more like... This is just rounded edges. It's probably also something that's just for trade show. What do you think? It's a bit of fun. I think one of the things that we're really seeing this year at IFA is that people are doing lots of ideas to change the design of the TV from just being a big black slab on the wall or just sitting in front of the wall. We've seen a lot of TVs look like furniture. We've seen invisible TVs that turn into pictures. Okay, they've been around a couple of years. Everybody is now looking at this, which is saying, let's make a TV that somebody loves. Yeah, let's make a TV that offends some people and other people love it. Whereas up until now, we've just had products that offended nobody, but nobody felt excited about them. And do you know what? I've got a bit of affection for this one. There's not much in that little corner that you're ever going to miss. Really? In the future. There's not much you're going to miss there. And it looks sleek. I think that's a bit of fun. I'd rather like that. A lot of phones are doing rounded edges also. Yeah, absolutely. It's kind of like having a big phone. So we've got a 75-inch smartphone there. And it hasn't got a notch either. Now, I think this is a bit of fun. And I think this shows that the industry is becoming a bit more playful. Right. So just very shortly, this IFA is a little bit like being a kid in a candy store, right? There's stuff happening with the TCL also. There's some new stuff. I think the pace of innovation is slowing compared to five or 10 years ago. It's a mature business. The TV business globally is barely growing. And it's a replacement market. And we're now talking about refinements rather than breakthroughs. It's also a market that's really struggling with overcapacity. It's a market that's struggling with low profitability. And so what we're seeing now is a lot of effort put in to try and bring value back to this market. And a lot of these little playful gimmicks and fun things and design are really going to become much more important in the future. And IHS Market, your company that does analysis of all this stuff? We researched this business. We forecast this business. So you have all kinds of customers who are interested to know what's happening, right? So our customers include the brands, the panel makers, the component makers, and above all, this is a big business. So it also includes all the people who finance this business, for example. And last, shortly, High Sense was up on the dual layers, partnering with BOE. And BOE is at the display week, we're said to be the biggest capacity. They do. They have, in terms of area, they make far more now than anybody else. So there's a lot of... Hopefully there'll be customers for all this stuff, right? That is the issue, that at the moment, then Chinese companies have staked billions, or even tens of billions of dollars, on everybody wanting a 65 or a 75-inch screen. And they've worked on the Field of Dreams business case that if they build it, then people will come. At the moment, there is overcapacity. There's a lot of overcapacity. And that risks... It is already damaging profitability.  So there's not everybody in India going to buy one? It's got to be at a price that they can afford. It's just like smartphones. In the smartphone business, the growth area is sub-$30 smartphones. In India, people buy 23-inch TVs because they can't afford a 32. And even if you sell a 32-inch TV at $100, which, by the way, means you don't make any money, then for many, many consumers, that is too much money. All right. But thanks a lot for this video. No problem at all, Nikola. Thank you for seeing this innovation happening. I think Ifai is pretty awesome. Yeah. Thank you.


Hey guys, it's Nate, AKA The Foot Accountant. Welcome back to the channel. It's Monday, it's market outlook time on this team of the year week in FIFA 21. I'm gonna talk about team of the year today, talk about the cards we might be seeing, talk about when the release will be, and just the questioning that we are gonna have this week. A lot of questions surrounding this week. When to sell, when to buy. The market's already down a lot. I wanna talk about that as well. Card prices are down, a lot of people have coins. Is EA gonna drop content this week to sink coins? What is there to do on the game this week? It's such a quiet week, last week it seems weird that with team of the year coming, we're just kind of in like limbo mode and everybody is just waiting and ready for team of the year, boys. And I'm telling you, we're almost there. I think it is coming this Friday and again, I will show you why I do think that. But one thing I wanna talk about first is some people are thinking team of the year is gonna start today on Monday and I kinda wanna debunk that. I want to debunk that because if we take a look at EA's page over here on the EA website, if we take a look at the little, the fine print, I guess you could say, the terms and conditions over here on the right. You can't see it on the screen, now you can. But voting actually ends on January 18th at 11.59 p.m. Pacific time. And I discussed this in further and other videos. But that actually is like 8 a.m. UK on the 19th of January. So technically today on FIFA, I think it's literally impossible that we would see a team of the year actually out in packs. Like I don't think team of the year is starting today. Of course in years past, it has always started on a Monday with either defenders or attackers in packs. And that's kinda the way that it has always been. But I think it's gonna be different this year based off of the way this is set up. And again, EA said that the voting ends on January 18th at, of course, 11.59 p.m. Pacific time. But they also said that the final team of the year will be announced later in January. That's when the special cards will come out. And again, if you did not see this in a previous video that we tweeted out, or we put out about when team of the year is actually going to be, this is from Weaver on Twitter. And he found a, in the EA website code. They did some searching. This is actually some pretty insane stuff. It says here in the blueprint, see who made the ultimate 11 on January 22nd. So technically, we're viewing this Friday as the time for when team of the year will actually begin. And this week, again, if you guys remember what came out last year during FIFA 20's team of the year, there were tons of loading screens, right? We started off, I think, on either Monday or Tuesday that week with a loading screen. It was honestly crazy. They released a loading screen for like multiple days in a row because they were basically just trying to build the hype and build the panic. Now, of course, what does this mean for us this week in the market? How is EA going to do it this time? Of course, right now it's a lot of questioning. We're really going to have to see what EA wants to do this week with this game and where they want to create panic and if they want to start creating and releasing content that people will be interacting with throughout team of the year. So if we take a look at some of the SBCs, this is the main thing I want to talk about in this video is what kind of content can we expect this week leading up until Friday, right? Especially for the market. A lot of stuff has dropped off a ton already in price but I feel like this isn't market crash prices that we're seeing, right? We haven't had true panic yet. This is not panic that we saw this last weekend. We just saw sell off, right? Now, of course, some of these cards are hitting like their lowest they've almost ever been but still to me, it is just sell off at this time. It is not pure panic yet. So I think we have some time yet before we can sink our teeth into some buys on some of these cards, right? Now we have some icon SBCs that were released last week. Those are out for team of the year. Those will be craftable, right? Bruno Fernandez player of the month. He'll be out for a while. We got more of these upgrade packs. I think EA might drop this one more time throughout the week this week. They might drop it on like Tuesday or Wednesday. These do expire on Tuesday. So maybe on Wednesday, it'll drop these to expire on Friday and you'll be able to stack these packs again. This is kind of cool from EA like GG's giving us packs like this that are basically just normal gold upgrade packs with easy requirements to stack and hopefully pack a team of the year from them. These upgrade SBCs go away on Wednesday as does the 86 plus upgrade. So a lot of this stuff you can see as well expires in two days, right? Marquis matchups, three days, that's normal but a lot of the live content, right? That Jonathan Dos Santos, SBC, the Gonzalo Higuain, the Tavernier, all those guys expire this week before team of the year would start. I think what you might see this week and since we don't have a repeatable icon SBC that is out in this game right now, just normal icon SBCs like for Kaka, for Roberto Carlos and guys like that, I think what EA might start to do this week is they might start to release content ahead of time that will be SBCs we could craft during the actual team of the year timeframe. Basically, a base icon player pick is a possible SBC since we've already had the base or mid and the repeatable base icon upgrade multiple times. I think it's very possible this week that you see a mid icon SBC possibly, like last year during team of the year there was a base icon SBC, I think. I think it was just the base icon that was re-released last year since we've already had that repeatable. I feel like what EA could do is the base or mid repeatable and then they also might drop like the mid repeatable or they might just drop a one time non-repeatable icon SBC but I feel like what EA could do this week is they could start releasing content that would be out during team of the year, like releasing that icon SBC that would be out for 25 days, right? Or even if it's out for 20 days, that would be an icon SBC that comes out early that continues to be out through team of the year when people like to craft packs. Same thing with flashback SBCs or player moments cards, right? Last year we had like the Bernardo Silva player moments we had a flashback dive with Louise and I think a couple of those SBCs came out actually before team of the year was released because this is again one last final shot for EA to try to take coins off of this game, to try to take coins off of the market because again, EA has everybody in a prime spot right now. Look at this in Bapé, 830,000 coins and you guys don't really need me to show you the graph of this card dropping off but he's dropped off a lot, right? We told you guys to be selling Saturday morning, Friday night he was 900,000 coins. He is literally down, especially today on Sunday, big dips in price, down to 830K right now, almost his biggest two day drop we've had in a long time. Veran was 170, he's now 140. Kante was 220, he's now 190, right? Neymar was 700K, he's now 650. So a lot of these cards have really, really dropped off from of course, gold cards being very supplied in this game but again, this is to me just normal weekend league sell-off and I think that EA could possibly put out more content this week that would make some of these cards go down even further especially the gold cards, man. The gold cards, I still feel like there's panic coming because a lot of people that sold their week and league teams this weekend, they're not the casual user base, right? The casual user base that's following this game is still operating almost per normal. I guess we do have a little bit of a teaser here on the news feed that's saying who makes team of the year? The voting closes January 18th, right? But after that, it's like, well, when's team of the year, right? So many casuals might not really be interested in that. So I feel like there's still more panic to come and still more prices that will be dropping in the future this week. And I feel like depending on the content EA drops this week, whether it's icon SBCs, party bag SBCs, you know, flashback players or anything like that in FIFA, I feel like a lot of people, since they have coins in that upper left, right? We talked about people panic selling their teams when it's a prime opportunity this week for EA to drop content like that because people have coins, right? People have coins. SBC fodder isn't that expensive, right? It's dropped a little bit because we don't have any like big time repeatable SBCs that are out. I know some people that have bought SBC fodder tonight upon squad battle rewards because they think an icon SBC might be coming, right? Like, you know, some of these 87 rated players like Firmino, 30,000 coins. With icon SBCs last week, this guy was 40K. He's been dropping off in the past few days since we haven't had a repeatable or just any sort of icon upgrade in the game people have been crafting and going after. So we have seen fodder drop off a little bit. And could it be a club stock time? Yes, it could be. A lot of people though expect fodder to drop during team of the year with all the pack supply. But if you wanna be maybe not risky with it but buy ahead of time, you might be able to buy maybe even today if some of these prices are low enough for you. If you take a look at some of these graphs and then hope for an icon SBC this week as EA maybe suck coins off the market. Like Albo was 28,000 coins, now he's down to 2221K. You might see some stuff like that. You might be able to trade with SBC fodder this week if EA does release content. But that's kinda like the biggest question mark about this week. Is it gonna be a quiet week? Like last week? Or is EA gonna drop that content to take coins off the market? Now, mentioning more panic, right? I mentioned the loading screens that EA will probably drop. I'm expecting to see loading screens if team of the year is actually starting on Friday like that game code would suggest. I would expect to see loading screens. And by the way, EA, can we get rid of the squad update? It's back, we need to get rid of it, all right? I think there's actually an update to the game on Tuesday that we're getting that patch that was released on PC last week. We'll get it on console this Tuesday. So hopefully that gets rid of that. But I think we might start to see loading screens. Today on Monday is the very earliest possibility. But then Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, if team of the year is legit Friday, you will see loading screens this week.  Promo videos on Twitter, you know? More of those votes, probably people voting who's in team of the year. You know, those loading screens that we had last year they showed like the locker room. They kind of showed us the car design. They showed us hints of jerseys hanging in the lockers of what players were in team of the year. They showed us that, I think it was, was it player moments? We had a car design last year. No, it wasn't. Player moments came out during Black Friday. But we had, they showed us player moments, SBCs and like flashback design in a loading screen as well. There was like three or four different loading screens leading up towards team of the year that they kept updating every day, giving us more hints, right? I expect that to happen again in this game. Now let's talk about prices for a second, right? Let's talk about prices and then we'll talk about what there is to do on the game this week. I wanna look at some high-end icons because a lot of people are asking me, yo, when can I buy Cruyff? When can I buy Pillay? When can I buy, you name it, icon, right? Whether it's out of packs, whether it's a prime, a mid, I still think we have another tier of panic yet to happen. Now there's a lot of qualifiers that have been going on which might, especially with the new requirements for those qualifiers, I think those go into place next weekend. But you've seen guys like this mid Vieira who was panic sold off sharply right at the end of December because that is when we thought team of the year was gonna be, right? We thought team of the year was gonna be like that. First week of January and everybody kind of said, yo, sell for that. And then since then, the markets actually risen up pretty high into this last weekend because people bought back stuff because they're just getting bored like that. I wanna, you know, we had the Weekendling Plus player picks that were extra put out this past weekend. So there was more demand for Weekend League. So we saw a higher market rise there. But this Vieira was three million coins, right? Basically on a three mil or 2.4 on the Xbox. He is 2.6 on the Xbox and 3.2 on the PlayStation. Even though he was 3.4 and 2.7, he's down a bit but he's not really getting panic sold. So I don't think you wanna buy these icons yet. I mean, we looked at Middle Cruyff today on the live stream as well. Check down the Twitch link in the description if you wanna check in the live streams, daily streams there where we're grinding packs and trading and talking about this stuff. But this Cruyff is 3.8 mil, right? He was 3.5 this weekend and he was down to 3.2 or below that at his absolute lowest. So he still has like 100K in my opinion to drop before he's towards his lowest point that he was this year and who says he can't even go lower, right? So we haven't seen true panic yet. So I'm waiting on the panic this week, boys. That's what I'm waiting on, especially for other, even out of packed special cards. I know I keep switching between the game and footbin here. But yeah, we've seen a lot of selling, right? A lot of selling. Casemiro 339 brought us over 5.22. We have now reached the low point. We are in the dip. But we haven't seen panic yet. And I think there is another realm, whether it's a loading screen, whether it's content that EA puts out. I think there is going to be a time where all of this stuff goes lower, especially the high tier stuff because when team of the year cards come out, people see the cards, they wanna go sell their cards to go buy them and try those new team of the year cards out. So of course, as we get more information this week, we'll be uncovering that and possibly looking at more panic that could come. I don't think it's the buy time just yet. Some people are gonna say buy Monday to Wednesday. I think you still wanna wait. Even on some cards like Road to the Finals or headliners that a lot of people are gonna be saying, yo, you wanna buy these soon. You wanna buy these quick because once we get out of team of the year, these guys are getting upgraded. Hold off a bit, right? I still feel like there's some panic that could be coming in this later this week depending on the content that EA released. So hold your horses just yet. I don't think we need to buy yet. I wanna figure out more info on team of the year before we start putting our coins into stuff that could technically still go lower as we find out more information about team of the year. So with that being said, what is there to do on this game this week? What is there to do on FIFA this week? There was a new objective with the Bundesliga league players, St. Graven. Of course, with all the Dutch links that are going around with Robin, with Kleiber, people linking those guys together. He's on the left side. So I still feel like this is one of the only things to do this week in FIFA is to maybe grind Bundesliga, watch your Bundesliga rare cards because you need the managerial masterpiece mode, which is I think it's like a 77 rated squad or something like that. So some of you really met a Bundesliga cards might go up tonight from squad battle rewards. And also the thing that people are gonna be doing this week is preparing for team of the year in terms of going on a sign on rare gold cards. And you've already seen these cards. They've been inflated, honestly, for the past couple of, honestly, weeks with headliners being in packs. Premier League rares are 950 coins instant selling on this market. If we check bids, I bet they're going for probably around 850 to 900 coins on bids as well. Maybe some in the 800 to 750 range, but this is kind of the timeframe where people are thinking about, yo, team of the year is gonna be on Friday or next Monday and they're gonna start preparing. And this is the way they're gonna prepare by buying gold rares, stocking their club. Honestly, boys, these gold rare cards, if we don't get supply from EA this week, these gold rares literally might be 1,000 coins to 1.1K by the time the end of this week hits. So if you have got gold rares already and you're chilling, you're feeling good, but just be careful if you're waiting to do this that a lot of people are buying up these rares and investing in these cards, right? And we'll talk about that later on in the week is that a lot of people buy those rare golds, team of the year comes out, upgrade packs come out and people go and sell those rare golds and they actually don't go up that much in the weekend because so many people are just listing and selling and selling and instead, the prices kind of stay the same instead of going up. If they don't require a league specific, if they require league specific rares for the upgrade packs, then we get into a very interesting, interesting place. But to take a look at what I'm doing right now on this game, there's still ways you can trade in this game, right? All these cards you see here on this page, Diego Carlos, I bought this for 150 today. I bought these both for 260. I bought these guys for both at 72,000 coins a piece. You can flip a lot of cards. Now some of these are from the weekend, some of them from last night. I bought both of these at 100. I bought this at on stream a couple of days ago at 269. You know, you can still trade with the really rare cards in this game. I still think there's gonna be some of these cards that bounce back up from the panic selling, not really panic, but from the weekend they sell off. This Bomba Inform was really, really low. I bought these at 70K a piece. I bought some Coondays at 70K a piece as well. These Diego Carlos who were at 134 and you saw me checking him at the start of the video. I believe he's like 145. But what happens with these rare cards is, since there's the weekend like sell off is happening, people are just trying to get their coins. They keep undercutting each other, but then the weekend league ends, right? Weekend league ends and nobody else is listing their cards up, right? So these cards just kind of naturally rebound from less undercutting. They kind of just bounce back a little bit. So Diego Carlos is up 10K from where I bought him. I bought those at 134, 135. And I still think by the morning time, he might be 150. So you know, you can still trade with this market, right? Look for open bids because a lot of people are gonna be worried about doing league SBCs this week to get packs as well. Watch your Bundesliga, Premier League, all the league SBCs that are out. People are gonna be doing everything in their power this week, a week before team of the year to be grinding the league SBCs or whatever packs that they can grind, whether it's objectives like we saw as well or just these SBCs to get packs to store up, to stock up, maybe even doing foot draft to stock up packs for team of the year. So that's kind of the market outlook for this week, boys. A lot of question marks. I still think you can trade, right? Look for fluctuations. Open bids are gonna be your best friend. Out-of-pack specials, the really rare ones, record breakers, rule breakers, all those types of cards. Cards like this, right? See on my transfer list, I've got a lot of out-of-packs items. You know, go through cards like this and just watch them on the daily. Just watch them on the daily. Watch them with their open bids and their fluctuations and know which cards are gonna be desired based off of who is in the game. And just, you know, I look at a lot of English cards. Like we were watching Joe Gomez is centered back in form tonight because of Tavernier. You know, we're watching this Campbell. He's down a lot because of his rise to Tavernier. Bruno Fernandez, his second in form was selling at 700,000 coins like a couple of days ago. And now the guy's down at 570 because of the player of the month and because of we can like sell off. But these cards are kind of bouncing back, right? You saw this Bruno was at 556 on bid. The one just sold right there for 580. This Usman de Mele was 1.13. He's still 1.13, but that's really cheap, right? This guy's 1.13. He could easily bounce back to 1.2 mil because of rarity, you know? So that's some stuff you could look it out for this week. A lot of people though, are gonna just keep their coins liquid and not trade and just wait for team of the year. Which I think, you know, there's less risk to that too. There's benefits of not having your coins involved. So we're just looking for the panic selling this week. I think it's gonna happen and hopefully all the stuff that we talked about in this video today does help. Because honestly, the number one thing to describe this week is just a big question mark. Until we get more information from EA today, tomorrow, into the week, we're just sitting here thinking, okay, team of weeks at the end of the week. What's gonna happen until then? The market's down, but does it go lower? I think it does. So we're just gonna kind of have to take it step by step day by day throughout the week, this week, until we find out more about team of the year. So that's the video for today, boys. That's the Market Outlook. If you did enjoy it, smash the thumbs up, comment down below if you have any questions and subscribe if you're new. It's been Nathan Foot Accountant. Catch you guys later. Peace out.