My contribution to this panel will be focused on the role of foreign aid. This does not mean that I don't recognize all the other dimensions, but I'm going to try to focus on that. And it's no secret that there's a lot of skepticism about aid in the popular press and in the academic literature as well. And of course donors don't always make it easy for themselves. There's a lot of clunkiness in the aid business and lack of coordination and waste of time and efforts are not unknown features. But does this mean that there's no role for aid in the different types of crisis that we have been discussing at this conference? Well, this is actually something that we at Wider have been looking at over the last three years. We have been doing a program on research and communication in foreign aid and we have tried to bring together 300 researchers from 60 countries. We've analyzed aid under five themes, social sectors, growth and employment, governance and fragility, gender equality environment and climate change. There are about 240 working papers, five position papers, lots of academic publications, policy briefs and so on and it is all available from our website. Some of the key messages include that aid is indeed effective and has had a very respectable rate of return, including in places with weak institutional environments. We have substantiated that. In addition and for example aid to education health sectors has helped reduce maternal mortality in the female male gap in youth literacy. And aid has, as Sandrine was referring to, helped save lives in rough places. I have included here in this slide where we have tried to identify the 15 lessons that we believe can be drawn. I don't have time to go through them all. So aid has worked in a variety of crisis we've seen over the past 50 years. I shall not go into the complex econometric literature on the impact of aid that has over the past years has been strongly converging towards a much more clear and much more positive assessment of aid's role than now outdated earlier critics have put forward. Let me instead reflect on some of the concrete experiences that I personally had to illustrate the role of aid in Vietnam, in Mozambique and in the African Economic Research Consortium. I believe there are lessons there that we should try to think about. I have spent about 15 years in the former two countries and have worked with the ARC since the beginning in 1988. So case one, Vietnam. Vietnam is a country that is growing fast, is developing fast and it has for a quarter century had very high growth rates and Vietnam has the world record in poverty reduction in relative terms. For the last 15 years I've been involved in a number of research programs in Vietnam on development in the countryside, in urban areas, in the private sector and in the public sector. Progress cannot be denied. There is an OUP book coming out on this in the beginning of the next year. Vietnam is not yet a democratic society but it is an example of a country with a strong development state and it is a country that was for years the largest recipient of aid in the world. Aid is of course only a part of the story but it is an important part. Let's take three concrete examples. Few would dispute that physical infrastructure is an important part of the development process. In Vietnam, major shares of the aid, both the bilateral and the multilateral, has been used to develop infrastructure. It's worked. Example number two is quality control. Customers have supported development of internationally recognized quality control systems for prawns and fish. Without assurance of good quality these products cannot be exported. In 2014 Vietnam actually exported 7.9 billion dollars worth of prawns and fish that gave 100 euros per person in Vietnam an income and of course this had plenty multiplier effects. I could as some of you will know my wife works on seed quality control I could tell a similar story about good quality seeds but I will leave that for another occasion. Private sector development is a third example. The private sector has played a key role in Vietnam's development. Aid has contributed technical advice, training, credit, capital so it has affected the development of the enterprises both big and small and we have the data to substantiate that. So has aid to Vietnam made sense? Yes. It has helped with infrastructure, local institutions and developing the private sector and it has given growth and poverty reduction. So Mozambique, another world record holder in terms of aid for a period of time. I myself got to Mozambique the first time in 1980 and I saw very close by how this country was destroyed. It was as the American ambassador at a point in time said ruined as a direct consequence of the Cold War and apartheid and at the same time a million people including hundreds of thousands of children were slaughtered. During those years I worked very closely with Adriana Malian and Pietro Couture now respectively the economics and finance minister and minister for mineral resources and energy in the new Mozambican government and the new prime minister in Mozambique was my so-called counterpart. And what we have seen since then is something that we did not even dream of in 1986 when we were at rock bottom. It looked really hopeless. I could elaborate. But peace did emerge. Concerted efforts helped and aid did help and Mozambique recovered. Lots of success and lots of problems but when you come from rock bottom you have a long way not to walk but to climb. So what did aid actually do? Among the things that aid did there was a major humanitarian effort. Aid helped save lives millions of lives for years and it assisted in ameliorating the impact of natural catastrophes a variety of times and now we are seeing the cycle again in Southern Africa. It led to lead death and suffering that otherwise would have been the case. And yes aid did help in a transition from war to peace in the 1990s. Example number two investment in human capital as we sometime refer to it which of course is an investment that makes sense not just for its contribution to growth but in its own right. When I came to Mozambique there were 12, 13 agronomists. I knew all of them. That number has since been multiplied by 100. Now I don't know all of them. A third dimension is growth and poverty reduction. No Mozambique is very far from the income level of Vietnam but it is certainly at a very different level than in 1986 and we do now have a new government that is trying to do its best in spite of the present squabbles. In spite of all of the difficulties the average GDP per capita in Mozambique has increased from $155 in mid-1980s to now almost $1,200 and in Vietnam from $740 to about $6,000 these are purchasing poverty adjusted numbers just let me repeat them from $155 to almost $1,200 and from $740 to more than $6,000 in two of the countries that have been the most aid dependent in the world so when aid is designed and implemented sensibly it does make sense. ARC, the problems of Africa are many and some of them go deep but one of the central factors in the 80s and 90s is in economic policy. ARC was started in 1988 with the explicit purpose of trying to contribute to solve this problem. Today ARC is a well functioning regional institution without aid this would never have happened. This goes in for example the following three dimensions in relation to macroeconomic management. We now see a series of African central bank governors who are a product of ARC at least I for one keep reminding myself that Africa has managed the recent crisis better than Europe in a more sensible way in many ways. Ben-Hendul from Tanzania is one example. ARC has also been responsible for a unique educational program and ARC is the African Economist Network many times together with WIDA I know that it's very difficult to measure these kinds of impacts of networking and communicating and getting together and so on and so forth but I certainly believe that in the ARC case one can point to a very distinct impact. And these three cases and they are only three I mean I have a limited time but this corresponds exactly with what we find in carefully econometric studies namely that aid has contributed in a significant way to economic growth through support to physical investment human investment and institutional investment. Those of you who keep thinking that or maybe aid undermines institutions do take a look at a recent JDE paper that addresses this topic very directly. Let me stress that nobody, no sensible person would ever argue that everything is working in aid. I started by using the word clunky as a way of trying to capture that. But we do as I see it have a moral responsibility to work with poor people and poor nations and this is reinforced on my side by noting that there is nothing in the up-to-date literature to suggest that on aggregate aid doesn't have a sensible impact. Of course assuming that you have reasonable expectations as to what aid could do. But do let me try to put things in perspective. This slide's aid is the line at the bottom. Remittances is the blue line well above and FDI is the yellow line on top. So could we just throw out aid because it's so small and insignificant anyway? Well, don't forget that aid can do things that the other flows can't. These flows are not substitutes. They complement each other. Yes, if you look at this graph, aid is larger than it has been before, now 160 billion in constant prices. I think it was 2013, constant US dollars. But try to look at this one. Look to the very right side and you will see that the share of donor GDP that is allocated to aid is somewhere between 0.15 and 0.2%. We promised decades ago to allocate 0.7. And if you think about what this says about donor effort, we could kind of ponder, I guess. Needs are still very great and as this conference has demonstrated, needs are increasing in a number of cases. Aid is also decreasing as a share of recipient country national income. And this one I kind of like. I mean, I know it's a little bit populistic, but this one asks, how much in dollar per capita do recipient countries actually receive? So aid corresponds to about 25 dollars per person per year in aid recipient countries. I mentioned a number earlier, 100 euros. But that 25 dollars, while it is in some way small, it can still make a difference if we use it correctly. But we are right now doing things that I worry about. We are now shifting the allocation to being money spent in our own developed countries to take care of refugees and undermining the flow that actually go. So it's not 25 that ends up out there where it's really needed. I'm trying to illustrate that aid that has given growth and poverty reduction, Vietnam. Aid that has helped put a country back on its feet in spite of the problems, Mozambique. Aid that has contributed to a significant increase in quality of economic policy, AARC. And I would like to just insist that these are things that have been, things that I have lived. And I do believe that I am able to act both as an engaged person that dive in but also as an academic that is capable of standing back and trying to look at things in perspective. And I would like to stress that these messages are consistent with the RECOM program of 240 working papers and all of the academic literature that I'd like you to take a look at. And I for one cannot really see why aid could not in future help address the kinds of crisis we have discussed at this conference. Rather than throwing aid out and being skeptical and talking about it not working, might it not be one of the areas where we could try to mobilize international enthusiasm as part of the response. There's only one part. Aid does contribute in spite of its clonkiness. So I would like to argue that uninformed rhetoric and cynical criticism is not really helpful. Certainly not today. But I would like to insist aid is only one element of the international response to crisis and in many cases it's a minor element. Involvement of other policy areas such as foreign policy, security policy, trade policy, and economic policy may in many cases be primary call for, and I've listed a number of cases here, where aid is not going to be the solution. And only if these policy areas are productively addressed can the factors driving human suffering and the war economies be overcome. I thank you for your attention.


A bushfire in Australia's Victoria State more than trebled overnight and authorities issued several emergency warnings in parts of New South Wales as a spring heatwave fan fires across the country's southeast on October 3.Around 17,000 hectares were ablaze on Tuesday in the eastern part of Victoria State's Gypseland region after high winds spread fires overnight, according to state fire authorities, who had deployed more than 650 firefighters, conditions are expected to change rapidly in. On Tuesday afternoon, with heavy rains expected to help douse fires but potentially trigger flash flooding, hot and dry conditions also led New South Wales authorities on Tuesday to ban open fires across large swaths of the state, including the Greater Sydney region. There were 82 fires burning across the state, 16 not contained, on Tuesday morning. That frontal system is making its way across the state which is bringing absolute welcomed rain to our fire grounds and will bring to an end what three days has been of very challenging fire conditions in the state of Victoria. Through my career, I'm used to seeing the traditional Australian summer where it's dry, you see the fire seasons come, now we are seeing changes in climate, we are seeing fire seasons start a lot earlier, go a lot longer, but the other thing I would point out it's spring and spring in Victoria can be very erratic.


Dear students, in this module I am going to discuss the chemical composition of RNA, RNA or ribonucleic acids. This is another major type of nucleic acid present in the cells. It is also a polymeric compound just like DNA.  So ribonucleotide is the monomer of ribonucleic acids. So each ribonucleotide is made up of three components and these three components include our ribose sugar, our nitrogenous base and our phosphoric acid. So these three components they join together and they make a ribonucleotide. And different ribonucleotides they join together and they make a polynucleotide which is ribonucleic acid. Here this is the first component of ribonucleic acid and this is our pentose sugar. Here the pentose sugar is a ribose. You know in DNA this sugar is also present but this is present in its derivatized form and that form is deoxyribose sugar. You can see at carbon number two an OH group is present here but in case of deoxyribose sugar only hydrogen was present, oxygen was removed. So here the pentose sugar is ribose instead of deoxyribose. This is first component of our ribonucleic acid. The second component of ribonucleic acid is the nitrogenous base. There are mainly two types of nitrogenous bases present in the ribonucleic acid and these are purines and pyrimidines. Two types of purine bases that is adenine and goanine are present in the ribonucleotide. These two bases adenine and goanine were also present in the deoxyribonucleotide. The next two types of bases that is pyrimidines and these are cytosine and uracil. Here you can see a difference. In case of DNA, uracil is not present and instead thymine was present in DNA molecule but here instead of thymine, uracil is present. So overall there are five types of nitrogenous bases. These are adenine, goanine, cytosine, thymine and uracil. Thymine is only present in DNA molecules while uracil is only present in RNA molecules. The third component of ribonucleotide is a phosphoric acid. Phosphoric acid you can see it has three hydroxyl groups and these hydroxyl groups they have ability to make ester linkages with the hydroxyl groups present on the pentose sugar either ribose or deoxyribose. So ideally it can make three ester linkages but normally in a poly nucleotide chain it makes this phosphoric acid makes two ester linkages. So this is a complete ribonucleotide. It consists of all the three components that is nitrogenous base, a pentose sugar and a phosphoric acid. These three components are joined together and they make a ribonucleotide and this ribonucleotide by combining with other ribonucleotides it make a ribonucleic acid.


The Earth. What's actually happening inside? Let's start at the surface. We see a composition of plates that are in motion relative to each other. Here the plates have a dark blue color and plate boundaries are light blue. Then we go down in depth by about 150 kilometers. That's 13 times deeper than the deepest point in any ocean. Where we see that the plates are subducting inside the Earth. A cross-section shows how, in this case the Pacific plate, is subducting at the Mariana trench. Now, to reveal the movement in Earth's interior, we take rock particles just before the trench, the white dots. We follow these particles on their long journey from Earth's surface to the deep interior, eventually rising back up after thousands of kilometers and then again descending. This cyclic flow of rock is called mental convection. An impressive look into the Earth, like shown here, is the result of a computational simulation of mental convection in the whole globe. Getting to this point was difficult in many different ways. We are to overcome huge challenges in several research areas. That's geophysical modeling, mathematics, computational algorithms, parallel software development and fast supercomputers. These are great tools and it's what it takes to crack the extremely complex physics of the Earth.


Hi guys, welcome to a new video today's video I'm going to be walking you through my mom's childhood home and keep in mind This was built in the 1960s and it's been around for a while We are having it like professionally cleaned soon And it will be on the market the real estate market soon before you get into it Make sure you are subscribed to my channel and press the little bell also follow me on Instagram It would mean the absolute world to me and I guess without further ado. Let's just get on to the house tour Okay, so this is the house tour of 511 East 2nd Street, Walston, Ohio.  This is a formal living room. I believe So this is what it looks like Going to the left is the formal dining room here Beautiful Inside here we have our kitchen Nice avocado green Pretty Here's the regular dining room Dining area we have two ovens and little dishwasher over there and Stove everything you would find in a kitchen this is the family room In here and you get this beautiful view of the backyard which There's endless possibilities that someone could do to renovate it and get it looking pretty Moving over here. We have we have the Florida room or sunroom as they call it Beautiful open area out here Still inside the house, but It's kind of outside. This is what the back patio looks like And this is another view of the backyard and Yes, that used to be a fountain There was water coming down there at one time Yeah, this is the back patio That's just another way into the hallway to the front of the house I want to make sure I show you guys everything. So this is a black and white themed Bathroom with a black toilet Valerie would love for me to say that she designed this bathroom That's why it looks different than all of the other rooms here.  I always thought that was really cool Then we have tons of storage this house always has had so much storage So there's plenty of room to store things and then here is the mirror and sink area This is it goes down into the basement, which is just a basement. It's not like furnished or anything Then we're gonna go upstairs And up here, we're gonna go to the left This room is a dressing room for Valerie I guess it's just where you like would get prepared for the day and this is Valerie's bedroom in here Very big bedroom. This is like my room times like six So this is her bedroom. She had like white and gold furniture Moving in here. This is a closet area. So this is Where they would store all their clothes and yes, this is like someone's closet dream. Oh This must be the crawl space So that's a crawl space. It looks like it. I don't know or the attic. I don't think that's the attic though But yeah, this is a closet and then you guys will see here when I go around But this goes into into another part of the house So kind of like a little shortcut, which I'll show you guys So coming on out of here You can either go down this hallway or you can go through the bathroom because there was like sharing bathrooms I guess so we have a tub here and We have two sinks obviously another chandelier here Very pretty gold finish on this like hardware Moving on over here. Oh, I guess there's a nice little window here You could see some of the backyard again moving down here We have the toilet and the bidet they actually had a bidet which is like kind of crazy and In here we have Valerie's parents dressing room area. So they each like had a dressing room And then this was her parents room. There's I guess still a TV here So that's her parents room and I'm moving in here. This is another closet So this was full of clothes as you could imagine It's like every girl's dream to have like a huge closet like that's another room. I'm telling you So now we're gonna go back downstairs So we've already seen pretty much everything downstairs. You guys saw the kitchen We saw the family room. We saw the sun room that door leads you out to the garage Which it's just a garage.  We go up these stairs and This is an attached garage apartment where they used to live So for context, this is where they originally lived and then they built on All of this other stuff. I know it's kind of confusing, but Here we have just a closet as you guys just can already tell there's a bunch of storage and everything. That's crazy In here another closet So it just looks like that. I like the shadows there. That's cute This is the door that I was kind of explaining to you guys. So that is upstairs Where we just were in Valerie's closet. So as you guys can see for concept Purposes I don't want to bang my head apparently everyone bangs their head on this thing. So you kind of be like duck but Then we're back up in Valerie's closet make a right in your own Valerie's room again So I know that's kind of confusing, but that is the little like secret passageway One might say in this house, which is pretty cool. Like I'm oh, whoops that kind of shut loud Okay, and then coming on in here. This is just another living room and This is what it looks like. It's beautiful. They have a beautiful brick fireplace there then Turning around here. They have even more storage. So there's tons of cabinets and everything So this is a good nice size living room. And as I just said, this was a garage apartment. So It's pretty cool coming in here. We have the second kitchen. I know there's like two kitchens in this house. It's crazy so we have the little bar here and the sink stove Etc. Again tons of cabinet space There's the stove the sink and then more cabinets and stuff Then over here we have this is probably like the little. Oh, this is a utility closet here I guess that's what it is. So Moving on over here. This door goes out It's kind of like a little patio. This was a patio, but they turned it into like, I don't know Just like this little enclosed area here Very cool very cool And And then moving on over here Guys this room is crazy. You guys this is the best part. So this is the hot tub room So we have a cute little sink here. I mean look at that.  And then moving on in here. We have the hot tub room. So this room Was never really used I guess but they put a hot tub here It's pink and then we have the green here Beautiful light fixtures again. Just such a stunning room. This is probably my favorite room in the entire house They have a shower Beautiful lights and then they just had like stuff around here, but it's all cleaned out now and then they could take a peek Out at their backyard. So if they were to open this up, they could see some of their backyard, which is pretty cool This is definitely my favorite room I love it so much and again more storage over here Then the shower is even like a pink color. It's more of like dull than the cameras picking up It's making it more bright, but it's more of like a dull like blush pink type of deal and then This was actually Valerie's old room when she was like a little kid But this is another bedroom in the garage apartment section and then we have the Closet there and It's pretty much it For the garage apartment And I guess that concludes our tour of 511 East Second Street. So I hope you guys enjoyed I also did want to mention that this is another door you can get in on the side So this was like a little mud room area It wasn't like a room But you would like take off your shoes here and then just like come into the house So that's kind of where like everyone enters. They don't really enter through the main door So I hope you guys enjoyed this house tour It was super fun to film and I'm so glad I have the memories to keep for my mom and everything I mean, it's just so nice to have and we have the technology now where we can keep such cool memories and everything So I'm really grateful for that leave in the comments down below. What was your favorite room? I think my favorite room was the hot tub room or maybe even the sun room That was a really pretty room Just let me know what your favorite room was because I would love to know I think that's gonna be it So I'll see you guys in my next video. Bye


If we got to the point where nobody could make their tweets any more searchable, would we have finally reached a hash equilibrium? War sucks, and is expensive. Most people, even most politicians agree on this, but we still make it a priority as a nation to pay for it. Why is it that the United States spends $820 billion every year, that's two and a half Googles on weapons and people who use them? Well, part of the answer has to do with game theory. It sounds like what happens when somebody takes a half hour to take a turn in risk, but game theory is actually a field of mathematics dedicated to analyzing complex situations and determining the best choices for players in those situations.  If you rat out a fellow prisoner for bad behavior, then you'll get set free and she'll get her sentence extended. But she secretly gets the same offer, and if you both end up ratting each other out, then you'll both end up with extended sentences. However, if you both manage to keep your trap shut, then you'll both get out a little bit earlier than you would normally. How are you supposed to decide what to do if you can't be sure what she's going to do? The answer is actually really complicated. This is a classic example of game theory called the prisoner's dilemma, and although it might just seem like kind of a dumb logic puzzle, the math developed to answer this question has been applied successfully to economics, science, psychology, ethics, and most notably in political science where it's played a huge role in warfare. Like let's say that you're a country and you have an opportunity to make a really powerful weapon. If you make the weapon and nobody else does, then you basically have free reign to demand whatever you want. But it's only a matter of time before somebody else figures out how to build it to defend themselves from you, and pretty soon everyone has invested the resources to make their own. I mean we could all just agree not to build it, which would be great because then we could spend all of those googles of dollars on stuff like Google, but we'd still have to worry about somebody eventually building one and upsetting the balance. Game theory has the same answer for both the prisoner's dilemma and the weapon problem. If you're strictly looking out for your best interests, then you should be the first one to sell out. It sounds like a crappy thing to do, but if the only thing that you care about is the length of your sentence or your safety, then mathematically the best choice is this square. And at the beginning of the Cold War that's exactly what happened. Given the threat of annihilation and the potential benefit of military superiority, the United States and Russia both expended massive amounts of resources to stockpile enough nuclear weapons to destroy each other several times over. But the power of those weapons led to a weird situation, even by game theory standards. You've probably heard of mutually assured destruction, which is a form of Nash equilibrium, a special state in game theory where nobody can improve their situation by changing their decision.  No sane person would ever do that, so you're both better off just sitting on top of your nuclear stockpiles and glaring at each other. But if you're thinking that way, and they're thinking that way, and you know that they're thinking that way, couldn't you attack and be pretty sure that they wouldn't retaliate?  Are they really going to double world-wide casualties just out of spite? They'd have to be crazy. Well, yeah. So to maintain that Nash equilibrium your enemies have to think that you are that crazy. And if you've ever wondered why things got so hysterical during the Cold War, that's why. Like President Nixon consulting with political scientist and game theorist Henry Kissinger would actually behave as though he was prone to bouts of impulsive and irrational behavior just to convince other countries that he was crazy enough to use nuclear weapons. So mutually assured destruction is inherently insane on some level, and it's done a lot to foster paranoia between nuclear powers. But you can't argue with its track record. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still the only two military targets of nuclear weapons in human history. My question is, will we ever be in a position where we can stop spending money on the upkeep of a nuclear arsenal? Or is the Nash equilibrium of everybody being armed to the teeth just the way that things have to be? Well, game theory only really works if all of the factors that can influence someone's decision, called payoffs, are accounted for and weighed accurately in its models. Like if everyone playing a game of Monopoly only cared about how much money they had at the end of the game, and played according to a perfect algorithm that maximized their income and minimized their risk, the game would be very long and very boring. But thankfully, people who play Monopoly care about more than that. They value entertainment and drama and laughing about getting stuck in jail repeatedly and finishing before dinner. So that algorithm doesn't always apply. In a similar vein, despite the fact that game theory clearly dictates that the prisoners and the prisoner's dilemma should rat each other out, studies on real prisoners show that they're actually more likely to keep their mouths shut. Why? Well, maybe they're thinking about retaliation from other prisoners, or they don't trust the warden, or maybe there is loyalty among thieves. If the game theory model for the nuclear arms race during the Cold War had some other payoffs besides military superiority or absolute destruction for the US and the USSR, maybe it would play out differently. Or maybe military force won't always be the bottom line. In a post-scarcity world or an artificial reality where everybody can have anything that they want, maybe there won't be anything to gain by threats of violence. Maybe, just like Monopoly, nations will someday discover that they don't really value pushing each other around anymore. Maybe they'll realize that they'd just like to be the top hat. Please leave a comment below and let me know what you think. Thank you very much for watching. Don't forget to blah, blah, subscribe, blah, share, and I'll see you next week.


What's up everybody, Jason here for Jasper's CaseBrakes.com, 0-3-0-4 Tops Chrome. Spot giveaway just sold out. This is a 2021 Panini Mosaic basketball hobby 1 box break. Random teams number one. And again guys, we're giving away five free spots in this break. So if you bought a spot straight up, you have a chance to win a free spot in this break. We're only selling 25 out of the 30 spots. So before we start the break, we'll use the same dice roller here. This will be for the five spot giveaway. Top five get a spot. We'll paste your names in here. We'll do the break and then at the end of the break we'll have the complete list again. Randomize the customer names with a separate dice roller and the top name at number one gets that $2300, 0-3-0-4 Tops Chrome Spot. So here's the dice roller. Let's do the free spot giveaway first. Let's click dice roll. We're going to use it for the same thing for the names and teams. We're going to get number seven, two and five, one, two, three, four, five, six, and seven. Boom. Revital, Steven, Nathan, Tom, and Robert. Congratulations, Robert. Two and five seven times. Boom. So you guys all got a free extra spot increasing your chances in the promo and also a chance to win that free spot with a little extra spot here. So there we go. That's the original list now. So let me copy and paste that and put that over here for later. All right. Seven times now here on the names and teams. One, two, three, four, five, six, and seven. Sean Maddock down to Terry. And seven times here on the teams. Come on. I'm going to post the teams in there. Come on, man. One, two, three, four, five, six, and seven. Denver down to Toronto Raptors. All right, now stick to what you got. This is a box break, not a pack filler, but we're still not going to have no trades, but I'll quickly show you guys your teams. I'm not going to go through them, but I'll show you guys your teams for about like 30 seconds. And then we'll start the break. All right. Chris Parent did get a spot in that R&B though for the Black Diamond hockey. So hopefully we can get that Black Diamond done as well. That'll be another promo break. R&B, so that'll be Ottawa, Montreal, Chicago, and then. All right, so stick to what you got, guys, like I said, no trades. This is a box of mosaic hobby though. So still have a chance to get some pretty nice hits. Here we go, guys. Little mosaic box. You can go to the back and start if you want. I'll be done in like 10 minutes. All right, here we go, guys. Pritchard, Patrick Williams, James Wiseman, Baisley Redd, Hallie, Joss Jackson, Cole Anthony Redd, and we have a center stage, DeMar DeRozan, who had a great year for Chicago, LeBron, and D'Angelo Russell had himself a game yesterday as well for the Timberwolves, that's a white eight out of 25, and Isaiah Roby for the Thunder, blue to 99, John Morantz, Silver Jameis Ramsey, Cole Anthony, Lamello Ball, Cole Anthony Towns, all right, here it is, Robin Lopez, come on, man. Coming for a little bit of the map. Here we can get a stained glass in here somewhere. Isaac Acoro, Straight Fire Yolkich, Danny of Deja Silver, Killie Nays Redd, and a swagger James Harden. All right, so not the best blocks we've seen of mosaic, but still stuff, some nice rookies popping out of here. All right, so here was all this, a lot of rookies, they'll be top loaded, and then your one autograph was Robin Lopez. All right, let's switch scenes now and give away that 0304 spot, guys. So regardless, though, you guys are in the promo if it does sell out tonight. Now let's give away that top spot. So here you go, customer name at number one after 301 four times, gets that free spot in the 0304, that's a $2300 plus spot. One, two, three, and fourth and final time, oh, four times. Sad times from Steven, look at that, two and three, unfortunately, down to 30. But number one is Corey, congratulations Corey. I don't know if you one-spot mojoed it, I think you did. Wow, this is the second filler that's had one-spot mojos. Congratulations, man. You don't want a spot in the break, so you're guaranteed two packs from 0304 Chrome. So let's put your name in there, and like I said, man, congrats. So next one is already posted, if not, I'll post it right now, and we can get another one of these done to help sell out the promo. Appreciate it, guys. JaspysCaseBricks.com