Hi everyone, Joe for JaspysCaseBrakes.com coming at you with the 2022 Panini National Treasures Baseball 2 box, Ram Team number 2, and more importantly, this is the last MLB playoff promo break. So this is everyone here, your final shot at getting into that promo or get additional spots in the promo if you've been lucky enough. Thanks everybody for getting in. Let's do the break first. All teams are in. Let's roll it and randomize it 6 and a 4, 10 times each. Different dice roll for the giveaway part and then the giveaway video is going to be in the next video if you're looking for that because it's in a different video. 6 and a 4, 10 times for names and teams, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. We've got Greg down to Ivan and then 6 and a 4, 10 times for the teams, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. And that's Angels down to Braves. All right, Greg with the Angels, Tristan with the Rays, Steve with the Brewers and the Dodgers. Ivan with the Cardinals, Jonathan with the Mariners, Steve with the Red Sox, Nancy with the Orioles, Chad C with the Reds, Nancy with the Royals, Dustin with the Astros, Colin with the Rockies, Ivan with the Twins, Chad C with the Rangers, Nancy with the Mets, Dustin with the Guardians and Yankees, Ivan with the Phillies, Tristan with the Diamondbacks who are down to their last three outs in game one of the NLCS. Dustin with the Blue Jays, Nancy with the Padres, Chad C with the Tigers, Dustin with the Nationals, Allen with the Cubs, Chad with the A's, Matthew with the Marlins, Chad Wright with the White Sox, Dustin with the Giants, Nancy with the Pirates and Ivan with the Atlanta Braves. So let's alphabetize by team. It's been pretty quiet in the chat, but, and we'll pause the video. Maybe there'll be some trade. When we come back, we'll have the break, stick around, BRB. All right, welcome back everybody. No deals are done, not even a whisper of a trade, so TWC trade window closed. Here's the final printout. Cut off the presses here on Monday the 16th. Thanks everybody for getting in. Craig Kimbrell got it out and then walked a runner. So the Craig Kimbrell show is beginning in the top of the ninth for the Phillies. Trying to close out this game. They're up 5-3, but the tying run is at the plate. All right, once again, empty box. We'll use a blank card right here to slow play the hits a little bit, although I did see a few, and good luck. Here is Tom Murphy. Nice colossal pass to 10. That's going to be for Jonathan and the Mariners. Looks like a nine out of 10 right there. Got Ty France, another one for Jonathan and the Mariners. That's a 99. Craig Kimbrell, two and one to count. Three and one. Oh no. And we've got Tim Anderson. Two out of 25, colossal patched, and it'll be for Chad Wright and the White Sox. That was a little low, but Dom gave it to him. Three and two to count. We've got a nice die cut material signature. Riley Adams. Butter? That's they call them? That is two out of 10. Dustin with the Nationals. And that looks like a double play. That's the ending ending double play. Kimbrell gets out of it. We've got Ryan Vallad, Rookie Otto, 25 out of 25 for the Rocks. That's going to go to Colin Laspod Mojo. 70% of the time Laspod Mojo hits 100% of the time. Now that the space ball game's over, let's check in on the Monday Night Football Games. Is that still happening? It is still happening. Here's Nicoladolo, 24 out of 25. That's for Cincinnati. That's going to be for Dustin. Oh, there's a fumble. Dallas is up by seven. 841 left in the game. Another thick hit right here. Six out of 10. Tyler McGill. That is for the Mets. That's for you, Nancy. I don't know if this is going to go into a 180 top loader. This might have to, if I had slider boxes prepared. Usually for the books, but there you go, Nancy. Another thick hit. That's Wander Franco, 38 out of 49. Tristan with Tampa Bay. The book, and then a relic, I think. The book is Bob Musil, 39 out of 49. Old Yankee, piece of the lumber. Although notice that this is upside down. Legendary materials should be up there. But to 49. That's for the old Bronx bomber. That's for the Yankees. That's for Dustin, the Yankees. Old piece of Bob Musil's lumber. Slider boxes from down there. And then this should be a relic. No, it's an auto. Nice, Tyler Maley. Die-cut materials. Mal, 27 out of 49 for Cincinnati. Cincinnati? No, he's on Minnesota now. That will be for Ivan and the twins. Second box. Another thick box that usually means no redemption or anything like that. Another nice colossal relic. Let's rob a refsniter. 1 out of 10. Boston Red Sox. Let's receive Harry. So I'm not sure what happened on that play. Wow, and then just like that, a pass interference. Oh, so it was a mucked punt. So the chargers punted down by the chargers. I think they called it Ford Dallas. All right, now a pass interference. All of a sudden, just like that, brings them right to the, what, five-yard line. Chargers. All right, we got Wanderfranco again. Tristan, there's Otani, 79 out of 99. Piece of the jersey for the angels. Where is he going to go in the off season? We got Daniel Lynch, two-color passion autograph. One out of 49 for Nancy and the Royals. Braxton Garrett, 66 out of 99. Order 66. Jersey and autograph going to Miami. That'll be from Matthew S. Third and goal chargers. Oh, that guy's wide open. Oh, good tackle. Tackled them just before the end zone. Fourth and short. Chargers down by seven. I mean, you've got to go for it, right? Dustin Harris going to, not Dustin Kemp, it's going to go to Texas, going to go to Chad Cromwell. Ooh, look at this, Johan Adon, 13 out of 25. Big piece of the Nationals logo. I don't think that's going to go into a top loader. It's going to go into a slider box. Fourth and short, five seconds up, they're going for it. They've got to call a timeout. They do. Dustin with the Nationals. And Hall of Fame signatures. Pedro Martinez, one out of five for Boston. Nice one for Steve H. And of course, out of fives and under, get the train whistle. All aboard the Big Hit Express. We've got a book. We've got dual signature materials, 30 out of 99. Royals on this side, that's Jackson Coar, Jersey and autograph. And Joe Ryan on the other side. That's a randomizer between the Royals, Nancy, and Minnesota, Ivan. One happy person, one sad person. And then let's see who's happy and sad in this fourth and goal play. Play action, Herbert too. Wow, and they get it. Gerald Everett, I think, touchdown. They got it. They converted it. Chargers are happy. And then back here is Mike Piazza, one out of 31. Feature Jersey numbers. It's going to be for Nancy in the mix. All right, that's that. Now let's see who wins this randomizer. We'll also use the same dice roll for the giveaway. So one dice roll, two lists. So there's the dice. We'll go Casey in Minnesota. Let's go back to the list. Get everyone's names, one through 30. Tristan Dynadustin and everyone in between. And one dice roll for both lists. It's going to be four and a five, nine times each. Let's do the dual relic dual auto first. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and ninth and final time after nine times goes to Kansas City. So apologies to Minnesota, apologies to Ivan, but congrats to Nancy with the Royals. Dual relic dual auto, going your way on book autos as well. 30 out of 99, nice. Now the big moment here, who's going to get that last playoff promo spot? Let's flip back to random.org. Four and a five, nine times each, only one winner. Name on top after nine. It's going to get the last spot. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and ninth and final time. So four and a five, nine times. Name on top after nine. Well, first of all, there's going to be a lot of sad people here. Saddest of all, spot two. Sorry, Dustin, unless your name is on top. But for now, apologies. Two through 30, thank you. We'll get him now. We won promos like this pretty frequently throughout the year, so just keep an eye out on jaskyscasewrakes.com every day. So after nine, congrats to Ivan. You get the last MLB promo spot. So check the next video to see what you won. Thanks, everybody, for watching. I'm Joe. I'll see you next time for the next break.


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebrakes.com, happy Wednesday the 16th of June, 2021. This is the recap video for the 2021 series two jumbo and hobby case double header break. It was a dual case break, double header break, random team break number one. Very big thanks to everyone here who got into the action, appreciate it. Now remember, vet commons in this break will not ship, but everything else will, right? Rookies and inserts and whatnot, and obviously the hits. So we did set aside, I did sleeve some of these short prints and some rookies and whatnot that we spotted, right? And some of these numbered cards right here. So here's a quick look at some of these. All of these will be top loaded before they get sent out. Nice, there's that Ryan Braun pink that was to 50. All these green foils, orange foil, red foils all look really sharp. Lot of stuff in this double header break. These were the loose cards in those jumbo breaks, those jumbo boxes. So we just leave those up. That blackboard was to 70. Nice orange, rookie silver. Oh, and these were the, those were all the non-rookie exclusive cards. All right, so not bad for these numbered cards and whatnot. Now the hits, the autographs, the relics, and the even lower numbered cards. And we top loaded right away. Now it's that Babe Ruth short print, which I thought was pretty sharp. There's another old school guy short print, Johnny Bench. Same with that Jackie Robinson. These camo refractors are down to 25. 50 out of 50 relic, Tanner Hawk rookie. This red shirt and apostle rookie out of five. Got the train whistle. You'll see that in the full length video. There's another Babe Ruth there. Another Jared Walsh camo, that's the 25. Key boom, Seager, Tisse relics, Machado relics, and a Trevor Bauer kick things off in the out of the first box of that hobby. Series two hobby box that we did at the very beginning. There you go, that was the recap for the series two double header break, random team break number one. I'm Joe for jaspyscasebrakes.com and I'll see you next time for the next break. Bye bye.


The marginal physical productivity is the rate of change in the total production with respect to one input or the last unit of the input. And this law of diminishing marginal productivity, it tells us that when we are going to utilize more and more number of one input gradually there will be a point that after this, this one additional unit of input, it will not add in the total output rather it may cause that decline in the total output. Or other words we can say that when we use one input, we see that our total production is increasing with 2 units, 3 units, 4 units. And even if we are going to add one more and more and more, then what will happen that the total production will decline. Now if we look at this aspect that law of diminishing marginal productivity tells us actually a sense of what it tells us. So don't look at attached resources with this aspect. Means if we are going to enhance more and more number of input, it can also be labor, it can also be capital. So whenever we are going to add it on, but the total production is not increasing with that input, then the cost of that input has to be higher on certain price. That will increase in the total cost or the marginal cost. So when there will be increase in the cost and there will not be increase in the total production, at the end there will be not the profit or the incremental part of the revenue but it will add in the loss. So this aspect that we have to keep in mind that the law of diminishing marginal productivity is basically explaining our point. So in the marginal product, when we use only one product, we see that it begins to decline. So that is the point of decision where the entrepreneur has to decide that either he has to change a combination or after this point, if he will continue to produce, he will be producing but at a certain cost and he will be producing but not at the incremental rate but rather in decrease or the decline for. Now if we look at the process generally, in the short run, the aspects of capital in machinery, we can say the building, we can say the land, it mostly change. So in the short run, the variable change, we can say it may be the labour. But if I look at some other examples, compared to labour, we can say it can be certain amount of fertilizer for the agriculture and at the same time for industry, we can say it can be energy, it can be coal and like any other input. So any input that is variable, that is going to change and we are going to add on, we are going to increase. So start may, when we more factor with certain combination of other fixed resources, add on, there are production possibility aspects. In that combination, if we accept any one production function and now we are adding a new unit of input, we will see that there is increase in the total output. But that total increase is a particular point where we will go and see that relative to that constraint, it has stagnated and it is not increasing. And next, if we go and see, there will be a possibility that it is decreasing. So here it will be the starting of the diminishing returns and the diminishing marginal productivity. And this will be that point where during the production process, the entrepreneur has to decide that this is not his profitable range and he has to start or stop his production. Stable may, when we see that in the start, this is the aspect where marginal productivity is increasing and again there is a part. Now from 7, it is going to decline and decline and it reach to 0. So it is the diminishing marginal productivity. And if it add this aspect, we are not going to stop our production further. It will increase in the diminishing absolute productivity, meaning that is that range where we will see that the total production it will decline. So this marginal physical productivity, it is our yardstick that with the help of the love of diminishing marginal physical productivity an entrepreneur can utilize this to decide at which state he has to increase the input, how much to increase and at which stage he has to stop adding that input further in the production setup to avoid the certain loss in the future. If we look at this graphically, we have already drawn that this is one average product and this is our marginal product. So the marginal physical product is maximum at a point and after that it declines to zero. And after this, if we go down further, this aspect is when the total production it will decline. And when we are increasing, this is that phase when total production is increasing at increasing rate and second phase, this it shows that total production still increasing but at decreasing rate and this is the third part where total production it will be decreasing. So this love diminishing marginal physical productivity it helps the entrepreneur to decide about the production stages.


It is currently 12 a.m. So basically what I'm really do is trying to sneak out of our bedroom in the middle of the night I'm going. Bye. I have to leave. I'm going out. What's up? Where? We're it's time to go to bed not to go to a damn club. You're not leaving me. I'm not letting you go. What is up mom squad?  Two days away from dropping our new merch We got everything set up right here It goes on sale September 3rd this Friday at 1 p.m. Eastern Standard Time You are not going to want to miss out on the embroidered hats our marble squad hoodies The crew next the t-shirts and the matching phone cases guys This Friday the merch is going live. Do not miss it. Do not forget it comment down below Which one are you copying? Are you copying the cat? Are you copying the hoody? Every single You can guys make sure to get ready click the link in our bio right now and get ready because Friday It's gonna go on sale and I want you guys to be the first people to have the launch link You guys can hurry up and grab it for they sell I want to see all of you repping repping our merch on your stories and everything We're gonna be retagging people. We're gonna be doing giveaways. Yes Everyone that is purchasing our merch and on top of that doing a huge giveaway with our merch No, yeah, and on top of that you just get to rep us. We literally wear these every day like this Friday is the day You're not gonna miss it now. Enjoy the video. We love you, and we'll see you soon Babe Babe are you awake? Babe what is good Marvel Squad and welcome back to our channel if you guys are new make sure to hit that subscribe button Enjoy the mobile family. It is currently 12 a.m. We went to bed about an hour ago, and I stayed up.  I'm gonna bring you guys with me in the other room I just don't want to talk in there because it's I don't want to wake him up Even though he's a pretty deep sleep or nothing really wakes him up I'm gonna make a lot of noise to wake him up when I go in there And I'm gonna try on the light so he's kind of like babe Why is the light on like what are you doing and then kind of like get him up?  Where are you going? It's like 12 o'clock at night. We have a lot of to do tomorrow But I'm super excited to get his reaction Make sure you guys are staying tuned and getting ready gives video a big thumbs up If you guys haven't already make sure to be coming down below to you Mariah and comment down below letter by letter Bedroom I want you guys to come down below letter by letter bedroom for a post notification shout out We're bringing that back we're bringing letter by letter back but I'm gonna go ahead set up the second camera and I'm gonna bring you guys with me and we're gonna pick up my Outfit get some cute heels on All right guys, I'm gonna stop talking because it's actually hurting my boys talking the slow But you guys already know what's about to go down. Let's bring in get it. All right guys, so the second camera is set up I'm gonna be going in the other room. I'm gonna change into my sexy outfit We're gonna get right on into it. I'm so nervous. It's so excited. All right guys So we made it in the closet. I have to talk super low because I don't want to wake him up quite yet But I do have this really pretty sexy red dress and I'm gonna go put this on We're gonna see if it's a fit if it's a vibe And then I think I have some really cute heels that I'm gonna wear with him. All right guys very very very sexy Red is just a vibrant color and it like stands out So he's gonna be like why are you wearing a red dress? That's like the most like wanting like color But I've never worn this before so he's gonna tell me what you get that dress and be like I got it for tonight Just be really loud. This fit I've done it like I love this dress. It looks so freaking cute like freaking slay queen slay slay slay freaking I've put try to put my shoes on I'm trying to put my shoes on I gotta go You're not goodbye. I love you shut off the light. No, I'm trying to put my shoes on I'm going. Bye. I have to leave. I'm going out. I'm going out. What time is it? No It's none of your business. I'm just leaving. I'm going out with my friends No, I'm going out. Where I'm just going out I didn't want to wake you up, but I clearly woke you up. So hey, let me turn the lights off Babe, it's literally I'll turn the lights off for you. It's literally 11 30. I'll turn the lights off for you. Bye. Good night. Sleep tight You're joking. Hey, what party? What is it? What are you gonna tell me? I'm going. No, since we don't really have much to do tomorrow Go back to sleep. It's fine. You're not leaving. Just go back to sleep. It's fine You're not leaving but let's go back to sleep. Nobody's even here. Just go back to sleep. It's fine. You're not leaving Okay, but why are you making sure you're just sleeping with me? No, I'm up. So you don't want to tell me where we're going See if you water because I'm about to get drunk and I need to make sure I'm like, I guess I'm watering me.  You never care if I go out. It's a Monday night We have work to do tomorrow. Madeline and Stephen are coming on Wednesday. We have to clean the downhouse still And it's 11 30 out of Monday. You're not going out. This is a while. You're leaving I'm about to get in And come out with me. Come on. We're going out. If you don't have to go to sleep, we're going to leave it You're kidding Are you actually not kidding? It's No, you're not. You're not. Who's driving you? Bernie's coming to pick me up. She's here.  Yes. Yes. I'm with your sister Okay, but if she drinks then she's gonna be driving you home. No, stop. She's not gonna be as responsible as you are Thanks No, I want a party. I'm a party No, why you're not going Why do I still don't make the bottom my hair down in my freaking heels on him? Why would I go all that way to prank you? Okay, I want to go to bed. I want to go to bed. I want to go to bed You're dead as line to me. That's the type of relationship you want to have So you expect me to wake up to you not being here and then not even know where you are and then I was gonna text you and say, hey, I didn't want to wake you but I didn't want to You don't do that. You don't you don't do that. You tell me first of all in advance you tell me I'm going on because I I would go with you No, you're not going out. Yes, I am. No, you're not. Yes, I am. I'm sorry. You're not going to go to bed No, I don't want to go to bed. Come on. I'm going to party. Good night. No, you're not. Brian Are you messing with me? No, I'm not. Babe, you're not leaving. I'm not No, you're not going to go. You're not controlling like this. Why are you not controlling? You're not going to go Yes, I can't go to bed. You're not my boss. You're not. They're not even here. This is a joke.  No, that's why that's not like me Not you.   Okay, whatever. Whatever. I don't care I I knew you know, I got you good. You did not give me. Tell me this is my first time ever wearing this dress What are you rating? I actually really like it, but I really like it too. Wait. I was confused because I've never seen that I know I know it's a new dress. I'm like, I had never seen it on me either So I knew that you would be like why you're wearing a red dress that like attracts, you know red house red Just a really vibrant color and like is attractive. Yeah. Oh, yeah, you know, so I had to come strong Babe, I'm half out. I'm half away. Please. Well, I'll let you go back to bed But team Araya came back. I can't wait to make a ball.  We're gonna go to bed together again. Okay. I'm sorry team Araya Had to get you back for the double pregnancy on the eye. Okay. Okay. This was your fault. Okay Um, but guys, I'm so talking of it's really late. So we're gonna go to bed But we do have to give our end the video post notifications shout out. I knew you're pregnant all the time No, I don't Actually, I'm gonna go to a club now. I'm gonna actually go ahead. I'll go to a different club But when I actually left you would not go to a club. Yes, I would no you wouldn't you went to a club A different one. Yeah, different why? But guys today's publication shout out goes to chili dog. She said merge is dropping on my v-day. So I'm getting it Wait, this video is on wednesday guys two days are much two freaking days And you guys can come I'm not wearing it right now But the fire merge the fire merge that we have in the closet right now That actually we wore today, but you can you know, yeah, you can't really see but guys We hope you enjoyed today's video and make sure you guys are staying tuned for the next video because Because I'm coming back and you're not sucks and I prank her better I just got make sure to watch my pranks. I just pranked my eyes twice in the same day two separate videos But guys, we love you guys so much. We'll see you guys in the next one until then. Peace. Love you guys


I came to the left, I came to the right, thank you very much. From here, from here. Karaba Bucun 24-5 is the champion of Niigaz's Play of Merhalas. He will meet with Miktar Rene. In preparation, Karaba, Marek Tayfafan Kulubu, they will gather their equipment in front of the stadium in the name of Tofik Behremov. They will walk about 1 km with their equipment. They will make different sounds. And today, in the game, Karaba's team will win. They will be happy and they will support him. I would like to give you an interesting example. Karaba Vektor played with him. He had a serious injury in his head. He was injured on the 11th, but now he is injured on the 11-30. He was injured, but now he is injured. He was injured. According to the report of his brothers, he was injured 19 times, and he was given a ticket to buy a ticket to the stadium in the name of Tufik Behremov. He was given a ticket to buy a ticket to the stadium in the name of Tufik Behremov. In this case, we will see what happens.


All right, welcome back.  Obviously you weren't busy voting because only four people have voted right now So take this time to place your vote in how many Should may have an air shipment if so, what should the quantity be zero, which means don't order now? 5 10 15 20 25 and we did it in increments of five because you have to ship in full cases So that's a common problem in reality and a lot of the problems would give you an sd1x We don't give that to you just so you get Understand how the mechanics work, but in real life you almost always have a case size to some point So I'm just gonna keep the lathering on until I get at least 20% of you voting So there's a little over 50 of you here, so I expect at least 10 We're at five now, so it's like a telethon. I'm gonna keep talking But so there's a bunch of different ways the reason why I like this problem Let me just give you some background is this was just one piece of it The real problem is these are fashion items and so they're only introduced for about six months And so then they go away So embedded in this problem of should I airship or not is the whole idea of I don't want to have a lot of extra Inventory at the end in fact the bigger question is what should my inventory policy be? For these items if I have to order them say X months ahead of time Right before the selling season starts I only have one or two chances to place in order during that short short selling period So this naturally suggests a newsboy or a news vendor problem, right? Because you have to make a decision ahead of time and then you only have a couple chances to Remedy or to do intermediate orders. That's kind of a complicated problem because we never really talked about Newsboy with two periods. I think I hinted at it when I talked about Tom Brady jerseys But generally I focus on a single period And so you can imagine if I have a chance for my selling period is this if I have a chance in the middle To do another order then what do you think that initial order of Q would be would it be greater or smaller? Hopefully thinking it through it'll be a little smaller than if you didn't have that period that That secondary ordering period because now I can recover So I don't need to order enough so much that I cover all the way I can order low and see how the sales go because then I could adjust that second order to Uncover it demand increased or make it really low in case demand didn't materialize So a lot of these fashion item Situations you'll have the advanced order and then one or two weeks in you'll have a chance for a secondary order Maybe at a little higher rate But still it's a chance to recover because you don't know what your demand is going to look like That was the more the problem but I wanted to focus in on one little aspect of it and that's this one and You could think of a couple different Implications of this but two approaches kind of came to mind and I'm still not a 10 you guys need to vote you need to vote Let me see what you're thinking So if you haven't voted yet take this time to place a vote whether you think it should be 0 5 10 15 20 or 25 I Promise I won't make fun of you if you give a wrong answer Because there's really is no right or wrong answer. It's just it's based on the assumptions that you're making So, okay, I think we're there. Okay, so it looks like we're evenly split You know actually the most predominant. Do they see the pole? This is very short, but let me just give you a preview as Arthur switches to it The most dominant one is is none So the idea and so let me talk about the pole and then I'll talk about the approach that I think everyone took Most people will you can see it now? It's getting there. Okay. Yeah, most of the the majority said zero Because don't do anything now and some hinted that maybe we should do something in a few days Other answers range 10 was the next most the common and then 20 and 25 one each So Two approaches to this in in my opinion that came to top mind as soon as I made started talking about this and I went Over it down first is you figure meet your CSL Your cycle service level the second is look at profitability For cycle service level you go to 95% and so the basic approach would be okay What is 95% how much inventory do you need for 95% and what some people make mistakes with and what I did the first time And in my Sergio corrected me is I look for over the entire length of the ocean LL not 40 days when in fact it's were five days in so you have 35 days left of Your time so do I have enough inventory for 35 days? So you look at the demand over the 35 days and I think that came out to be What seven what did it come out to be 86 with a standard deviation of 16 and now some people said well, this is already shipped There's no I don't need to do standard deviation anymore. That's not really true because if you look at ocean shipping Yes, there's some variability on the upfront But there's also shipped port-to-port variability and then at the other end So I wouldn't take all the variability out just because it left I would keep that in So you have this variability and so then it's pretty mechanical to figure okay I need how much do you need to have 95% and The current for 102 bags. I found out that that would give you a probability of stock out of 83% Is that right do I have that 17% so it gives you oh That's backwards, right? Yeah.  You're only providing 83% probability of Cycle service level in other words 17% of the time you probably stock out So in that respect if I wanted to make sure I hit CSL I could ship I think it's 10 point something like 11 rounding up to 15 Ship 15 bags. That's if you wanted to make sure at that point in time You had enough inventory to cover that full 35 days So then you can go in and say okay How many bags does it take and you can figure that out and they end up being like I said 11 round of 15 But you might ask two questions one is is that profitable and two why do I have to do it now? And so let me talk about the delay one first because I think that's something that a lot of people suggested was really getting to like the policy and So for that the question is I'm sure I ship now or should I wait? So if I ship now, I'm gonna ship a certain quantity and it's gonna show up in 10 days So they'll still be 25 days left before ocean comes Do we think they have enough to cover that next 10 days? Looks like it because they're you know very very strong. You can figure it out What's the probability that they would stock out within 10 days? I'm guessing it's gonna be really really small probably less than 10% So then you could and the next question is well when should I place in order should I check tomorrow to see what the inventory under five days from now 20 days from now, you know, you're not gonna ship 15 days from now Because you have 10 days left so 35 months at 25 days So 25 days from now you're not gonna do because then it would it would come the same time ocean would So you can start backing off when's the last time you could have that it would affect And you can you can do it that way so some people suggested check every five days or every next 10 days That's fine You could actually think about a policy that checks inventory on hand because that comes pretty quickly You can get that at the end of the day and compare that to the 95% the inventory level required For 95% cycle surface level without amount of remaining time and as you can guess is that time period gets smaller Both things will go down. And so the question is when inventory on hand dips below that Then you can trigger an order. That's one thought But you can hold off for a while. So that's creating a slightly different policy for that One of our students my mom asked if it would be okay to round down to 10 Sure, sure. So then what do you? So you say is it okay? Sure So what does it mean? so you're actually having a slightly different cycle service level and so Realistically, it's no big deal, right? You'd probably have a 94% cycle service hole So the question is generally you round up because it's better to be a little overstocked But you have to look at the whole situation like I explained for these bags. They're fashion items So you don't want to have any extra Maybe I would go down unless you sell with the profit margin is on these things though, right? So I'd rather sell one and have one extra then not have one. So you have that trade-off So I would have to tell you it depends in this case. I would probably actually not order anything right now. I Would probably go with zero you because delaying makes more sense. I Haven't thought that originally, but I think that makes sense But let me give you another perspective and that is if you look at profitability Before I leave that anything else you want to talk about the first purchase you insert you have it slightly different No, I think we had the same approach. We just Yeah, I was our proposal was to order 15 bags three cases to maintain the cycle service level at 95% If that's important for the company Well, my actually trying to and she voted as opposed to some of you other people haven't voted yet And she said 10 for me to reach the 95% And so there might be a reason actually that I didn't get into and I didn't find out about that your decision is now or never Maybe you don't have a decision five ten days. I don't know But if I had no chance of delay and I wanted to stay with 95% I would ship I would ship 15 bags because I the way the profit is looking here. It's pretty profitable So I wouldn't want to be short Okay, but let's talk about the second approach and that's profitability So hopefully you guys look at the profit a little bit to find out what it is and actually if you want to maximize profit You can look at the expected profit if you do nothing Right, just don't ship anything by air freight and that came out to be around 3700 dollars 3,725 or something like that and all I did was the probability of the price Comes expected demand minus expected units short minus the cost of the goods. So let me I'll put this up Arthur, let me know when they see that. Yeah, so this should look familiar to you It's just a profitability statement. It's for news vendor, but it applies for a single period the first term is looking at the Expected demand multiplied by the profit Excuse me the price minus the salvage value And then you've got the cost of the good soul and that's C minus G the cost minus that salvage value times Q the amount you ordered and the last term is the expected unit short And as you would expect you have the price you get Minus the salvage value plus this big B, which is like an extra penalty if you're short You should it's in the key concept documents. Hopefully you've tattooed this formula on your on your body somewhere But the idea is that you can look at it from profitability and so and Initially, I'm assuming no G and no big B. So no salvage value and no Extra penalty for stock out and in that case the profitability if you ship 15 bags Reduce the profitability by over 1,300 dollars And the real lesson here is a member if you set a cycle service of 95 percent Chances are that's not the most profitable level. In fact usually when you set a cycle service level The behavior is that you're assuming the stockout cost is massive when in fact even for here for a high margin value It doesn't make sense. In fact, I didn't figure out. Did you guys figure out? What the what the max profit would be I think you'd have to ship bags back to have the prop the maximum profit number So remember because when you do the maximum profit, you're looking at the cost of shortage and excess and you're balancing that However, you can go a step further and introduce a salvage value and then an extra penalty for stockout because We can look at the loss in margin, right? If I don't sell one then it's I don't get that margin But also I might incur a penalty that these people might say you know what these bags. They're never in stock I'm never gonna shop here again. I'm gonna go buy something else And so you have this other penalty that is incredibly difficult to find This big B But what you can do is is back into it So let me talk about both of these these letters the G and the B the G is the salvage value So for news boy, we've kind of made the assumption at the end of the selling period if I have actually inventory there It goes away It's I have to scrap it burn it and I don't get any revenue and that's not the case For a news boy problem. It is right after that period. You can't do anything But I can assume a salvage value So what if I assume a G and I can make an assumption here that it's you know, I take a holding cost I take Two months off or three months off or think about the discount that I'd be able to sell it for So let's say the salvage value is 10% less you can figure out that way and figure that in And figure out what your optimal value should be the challenge is If my salvage value is not that much different from my purchase price Then it's gonna say order as much as but this ship it there because the profit is so high So it gets a little tricky So you have to really factor in the total discount such that the product is being eliminated And that gets a little tricky, but let me talk about the B So if you have this salvage this big penalty for stocking out You can actually figure what that should be to make so the profitability of the two solutions are equal So in other words if I ship 15 bags, I can backwards calculate What would the stock out cost have to be that dish will be be such that it makes sense Because then I can go back and say, you know what this is what that be value is So do we think the stock out cost is this and when I give my initial calculations, which I don't think are quite right Did you fix that number too? Wow is it comes out to be about $1,100 a bag So if you think the bags go for how much did I say? What are the price of the bags? Yeah, so this is almost 8x So if you think the loss of a stock out results in a future revenue stream loss of about $1,100 Then you should ship the bags. So it's another way to look at it at the problem So there's two different solutions there By and then the part two that are three Formalizing the policy. It's actually a really interesting question because what no one has said that I can see yet If I said a long-term strategy here It will affect things. We didn't talk about safety stock We don't know how much safety stock there is But imagine that if I introduced this way of bringing things in 10 days instead of 40 days What do you think the safety stock will do? It'll probably go down, right? So I would step back and say because essentially then its cost of air is the cost of stocking out And I can put that in and try to find what my optimal policy would be. So this is essentially like a V2 or a P2 pricing Strategy where you have you know cycle service level in the item fill rate and then you have a P1 P2 And so this would be I'm sorry V1 V2.  Oh, that is so not true so the question is this is a fashion item and so I Bet if you talk to anyone from the company, they would disagree with you Because there is a drop. I mean physically. Yes, it's the same bag But just like clothes just like how much would you pay for an iPhone 5? Versus the iPhone 7 or whatever that's coming out. So And it's not just functionality. It's just the style. So there is a definite drop There is perishability in these fashion items The question is how much does it bleed? Is it a hard stop at six months when they stop selling or can they start selling these through an outlet? Outlet channel because if they keep it in there If they keep that older item in the same stock, then it cannibalizes from their new products Which they make higher margins on so I would I disagree a little bit that the value does drop It's any kind of fashion item anyone who's bought Fashionable clothes not me my wife does though should you pay more? When something's just launched and then later on it loses in value. That's why they have to discount it You know there break up room they were commenting what would happen if the man was back order But you know back ordered. That's an interesting question then Ocean no air if it's back or you're not losing anything Right. So what the heck unless you're paying a penalty which usually they're not so if it's back orders think about iPhones They're what they're really clever a lot of the Companies do now is you do advanced orders and Amazon so you do an advanced order for something Essentially, you're getting a demand signal and so if we have back orders here, then I wouldn't even entertain here I would have it just come in ocean because I know they're waiting for me And I would yeah, I'd wait as long as possible because then who cares if I stock out Yeah any other Yeah, they Down into using the existing inventory on hand as a demand trigger. Yeah, probably is the coverage a month versus delayed emergency T-minus 10 covering a spectacle play with this man our ability. I guess this they are talking about the policy Yeah, yeah, so you get to the policy. I think So if you're able to order later on Then you don't need to order now and that's the thing so the policy would have to come up The two things would happen if you suit this in a policy one is your your cycle stock Excuse me your safety stock level would go down and then it would be a little more complicated than just a If you assume it's periodic every day as a period you can check every day even though you might not order every day So you could have an RS you could introduce an RSS a little less than a big S So I only look at it if it's below and above a certain number But those numbers are not static anymore Both of those numbers change as my time we go to the ocean Shipment arrives, right? So I don't even know what you would call this policy. I Also, don't know any inventory system currently in the market that would handle it I'm trying to think because usually you have to put a static Quantity and what we're saying is the the little s in the big S the min quantity the max quantity Shrinks as you get closer to this time window and then goes back up again once you ship So it's kind of a dynamic inventory policy. There's a paper there somewhere for someone to write about this And so it could be an interesting problem So we have like 10 minutes left and so if you have any last burning questions send them through the chat We'll respond to everything we get. Thanks that the voting has come in much more now We're up to almost almost 50% awesome Thanks for participating and again. This is just a rough idea of how you'd approach it And I don't know what the right answer would be I would in this case if you're allowed to I'd delay a little bit Let's still look for that trigger and use air very selectively because this might allow me to lower my safety stock Because they're with every fashion item. This isn't the only item they have they might have tens or hundreds of items You can treat them a little differently and then you can some will sell more some will sell less So you can lower down your initial quantity here and use air To adjust if something's a really big seller, you know You can use this more expensive but faster transport to minimize your total safety stock and your total costs So we want to collect more of these kind of problems So please email me if you have anything else that any problem Do you think would be interesting for the group to solve or to talk about? Because the big thing I want you to take away is that it's not always obvious and it's not always just the math Because a lot of what happened here is you got to understand the other things going on With the company and in the situation So thanks, okay That was really interesting and I hope you enjoyed it now I would like to ask please to just share with us some final thoughts to wrap up You see one X and also like give us some good reason to roll a C2 X Yeah, so hopefully you're taking this in order. I think there's a wave took SC0 X Probably with Amat is that right Sergio and then FC1 X Here breakers zero is right before and then you'll take SC2 X with Sergio And so in one X zero actually is all methodology Hopefully you're taking in order and this was the first one you've taken if it is I recommend you take zero next instead of two Because in SC2 X we're gonna do we're gonna use mixing your linear programming a lot And I'll talk about that in a second. Let me talk about SC1 X SC1 X used all the methodologies that you learned in zero and supply chain analytics to solve the basic fundamental trade-offs And that's what we're doing here trade off of shortage and excess Like transportation and inventory looking at cost and level of service and where it gets really interesting is when you Don't have all the numbers or the numbers are squishy and that's like 99% of all cases in business Very rarely will an EOQ problem run up to you and announce itself. Hey, I'm an EOQ problem or I'm a newsboy problem There's different aspects of it and there's always different approaches you can take You just got to figure out the one that makes sense for your situation. So an SC1 X we taught you Forecasting how that fits into inventory planning and how transportation fits into that Because the biggest thing for supply chain is that product that has the biggest cost to it Where there's a sunk cost that you bought too much the shortage costs So both the forecasting and transportation Feed into that and hopefully you're getting a good understanding of how they interact with each other Better forecasting leads to smaller safety stock faster transportation can also affect the inventory policies as well Brexit 2x we kind of focus in on the design of the flows the physical flow the financial flow and the information flow between a buyer and a seller and so we start with the physical flow and The main tool that we focus on is something mixed in your linear programming So if you don't know what a milk is you shouldn't take SC2x yet. You should go back and take SC0x which starts in one week the 13th of September because that will talk about optimization and We'll talk about linear programming integer programming and mixed integer linear programming because an SC2x we use the heck out of it We use it for network design. We use it for aggregate planning. We use it for production planning We use it for procurement because it is the most widely used tool in practice So mixed into your linear programming. We'll talk about the physical design facility location How you should flow products we've talked about channel strategies So what we were talking about here is a wholesaler where we're shipping things out But there might be another way these bags are sold which are through e-commerce which has a very different demand pattern So we'll talk about that as well, and then we'll introduce Finance we'll talk about supply chain finance and the critical things that you need to know to be able to talk the language of the CFO the chief financial officer, and we'll also Discuss a little bit about procurement How that ties in and also on the other end the customer side will follow that information flow from supplier to final customer And then some of the reverse flow But the whole idea in 2x is to take the methodologies from zero The trade-offs from one and kind of show how they all fit together in the design I like to call it the cornerstone class and I sent that note out or when I introduced myself to the To the class this morning It's the thing that ties together the first two courses with the second the first two are very quantitative Models kind of done in a vacuum, and then the last two are all about practical implications Whether it's dynamics of other partners Border effects disruptions the size of the company practical concerns That's what we really move into but you can't do that until you understand the models So se 2x is the keystone It kind of ties things together, and that's why to me. It's my favorite class I love teaching the first half of it because people finally see how network design works, and that's really a cool concept That's why you should take it and also you should take it while Sergio is still teaching it because he's he's the best And he's sitting in the room All right, so that's that's my consent on it any any last comments or questions in yes Yes, we will be happy to have you in the situa x or it is your eggs. So please and roll and Before attending this live event, let me share with you a few practical issues We will open our final exam of x1x tomorrow at 15 UTC So remember it is a kind of some if you only have four hours to complete it. So plan your time. Well It consists of four problems. You will have plenty of time to do that for hours is more than enough And please carefully read the instructions before beginning to complete the exam. This is really really important Second point I would like to to share with you is an important notice for all of you very tight learners and It's a call for you to verify your ID in the platform in edX because if you don't do that We won't be able to send you your certificates when you pass the course. So please Look at it. And if you haven't done it do it now because remember your ID verification But we do your photo and then you show your ID photo That's not tied to any course. That's done annually So I don't know when the last time you did it but every time you're on a class There's at least three or four learners Who forgot when they did it and they don't get certificates they have to go do this stuff We have to go through this big process and so just check and see when your ID verification Runs out and just re ID verify Yeah, this is very important. And Finally, we are looking for community teaching assistants Well, since you know, we are opening new courses It's a zero X a C2 X and a C4 X and we are looking for motivated learners who want to To help us in the form to help to create a great learning experience for all your fellow learners So easier if you're interested, please fill out the form. We are Sharing in the in the updates in the C1 X and also in the newsletter. I will send to the There will be a link to this form to apply So That's all from my side Anything you would like to add. No, I think I've talked enough Thanks guys. Good luck on the exam that opens tomorrow. Good luck. All right. Thanks guys


I gripped you tight and raised you from perdition. Ooh, that's a hot mug, guys. Hey guys, Merry Christmas. And here is my review for supernatural season for episode one, Lazarus Rising. I have been looking forward to reviewing this season. This is a season that I've gone back and forth on in terms of being a really good season to being kind of a subpar season. And Lisa say the opening of this season is still banging. Someone made a comment back with my season two opener review that the best two openers of the show were season two and season four. And I can completely agree because this is a damn good opener. The episode has consistent intrigue, tension, fear, chaos and excitement throughout its entire runtime. For 44 minutes, we were given so much story, mystery, wonder, development and overall interest in what is actually at play in the supernatural universe. It starts with Dean literally rising from the grave, finding the entire area around him devastated. He finds a little gas station and starts to hear a noise that gets so overwhelming it smashes the windows. He eventually finds Bobby who after having a fight of trying to prove that he is in fact a human, proves that he's a human, Dean starts to slowly catch up on what's happening and then they go and see his brother. Sam at this point is also massive. Like I'm not saying big, I'm seeing like he jokes because when he goes after Dean and raises his arm up with a knife, I would have been terrified if I was in Dean's position as well, even if it was my brother. But then they have that heartfelt hug which is one of the best hugs in the whole show. Just a sappy little note, it is one of the best hugs that they ever did in the show. They get to reconnect but they also are still in the dark on what brought Dean back aside from the handprint that's on his shoulder. They go to see Pamela who honestly, I kind of forgot about Pamela but she gets her eyes melted out and it's a pretty scary bit because you like this character and instantly she's got her eyes burnt out.     That was how you felt throughout the entire moment. It was such a great tension filled anxiety boiling moment and it was so well executed. And then we have two major revelations. The first being that Ruby is in fact alive and she's helping Sam learn these new psychic abilities which lets him take demons down back to hell all the while Castiel is revealed to be an angel of God. This was really, really cool for me both back then and now for completely different reasons. My original reason being, hey, whoa, they did all this work to say that angels and God didn't exist and now we have an angel confirmed what I'm just as irritated as Dean is because where y'all been? But it's so really cool that we have this whole lore thing and now there's me now going, wow, that's what it was like when Castiel actually mattered. Whoa, it's been, it's been so long. This episode had fantastic intrigue. It laid great groundwork for the season that was to come. It got you invested in the events around while also really doing a good job of keeping you in the dark but in the dark that you like in terms of the angel saying this is it, we're all done, this is the end. Little do you know exactly the grandiose-ness of what she's talking about. We don't know who Castiel really is for. While he says he is an angel, why is he the way he is? His mannerisms are not what we got used to. He's still this avenging angel, this supposed soldier of good or at least that's what he's led to believe and the mystery with Sam and his powers. I miss when this show had development. I miss it so much. Either way though, this is a fantastic season opener. It's one of the best episodes in supernatural history, bar none. And that is why I'm going to give Lazarus Rising a seven out of seven. Boom, baby, we are starting off strong. I am absolutely stoked. I can't wait to do the next episode and I can't wait for you guys to come along with me. And I can't wait to talk about episode two. Are you there? That's me and Dean Winchester. So just as we've done before, leave a comment about what you thought about that episode in the comments below and I'll read them off in the next review. But also I do have something that I do want to talk about with you guys. Ever since I passed over 3,000 subscribers, the thought of getting a Patreon account has become more and more prevalent to me. But admittedly, I don't really know how to set it up. So far, the only ideas I've really had are maybe asking for like a dollar or two a month and then maybe doing a little bit more to have like title shout outs at the end of videos and whatnot. I'm kind of in the dark on how to do this. I've watched a few other people and admittedly there are some cool ideas. I don't know if I could commit to them entirely mainly because of the industry that I work in but if you guys have any ideas or if you guys are for it, I don't want to push something on you guys. If you would like to support me in that kind of way that would be most definitely appreciated especially with times going on but I obviously want you guys to take care of yourself. Would you guys be interested in it and what would you like from it? What would you expect from something like that? Anyways guys, that's all from me. I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did leave a like and if you're interested in more subscribe and I will see you guys on the next episode review. Thanks for watching the video. My name is Knitz and you might remember me from the animated cult classic TV show, Undergrads. It's been a while but I'm happy to say the click is finally getting back together in an all new movie thanks to a successful Kickstarter campaign but we are still asking for your support. To see any and all updates about the upcoming Undergrads movie be sure to check out and like the Bring Back Undergrads Facebook page and with any luck, we'll see you guys soon.


November 1st is the trade deadline so we wanted to cover five players that could be traded to other teams prior to that deadline. Now every year rumors pop up with these big name players but realistically a lot of these players don't get traded just because with cap space and the draft picks it just doesn't make a lot of sense for teams to trade for these players. So we want to focus in on five players that could realistically get traded. Player number one I mean it's already out there Christian McCaffrey the Panthers are already openly shopping I don't want to say shopping but like they're they're hearing they're listening to what other teams have to offer. Steve Wilkos I keep on saying Steve Wilkos it's Steve Wilk. Steve Wilkos is a good off boy Steve Steve guy but Steve Wilks as the interim head coach Matt Rule was fired like this is already a rebuilding season for them. They just want to look ahead to the future and if that means getting a lot of draft capital because by the way for the Panthers they only have a first a second a fourth and a fifth only four draft picks this year a team would only have to pay like a little bit over one million and then in future years yes you have to take on 20 million a year but they can figure that out for themselves but for the Panthers they would take an 8.7 million dollar cap hit which sounds like a lot and it is like a good chunk but it's not like the end of the world if they trade them so McCaffrey could get traded and some teams that could be interested I know that the Bills were openly trying to acquire Christian McCaffrey in the offseason they were shut down the Rams could be in line with Cam Acres being in the trade market the Arizona Cardinals the run game just hasn't looked great for them they need to step up Kansas City Chiefs as well what is the compensation I mean nothing less than two high draft picks I would say like if you want to throw in a player and just one draft pick sure but two high draft picks whether that be a first and a second to first I don't think you do it for two twos maybe they do but I'm thinking like a first and a second at least the Panthers would accept that for Christian McCaffrey so again throughout the duration of the segment leave your comments I'd love to hear your thoughts what do you think Christian McCaffrey would go and what do you think that compensation would look like the second player let's stick with that team let's stick with DJ Moore again the Panthers need more draft capital only four draft picks and Moore who has been looking the best because of the poor quarterback play could get traded I know that they just traded Robbie Anderson to the Arizona Cardinals so are they really like let's just shop our best receiver at this point I don't think the Panthers go all out and trade Christian McCaffrey and DJ Moore I think if anything they trade one or the other and get some draft capital out of that but I don't see them just getting rid of everyone at this point for DJ Moore I think the compensation that you could get out of him is maybe like a second rounder or a third rounder but anything less than that I don't think that's happening and anything more than that I don't think he's worth a first round pick at this point for the cap hit it's only six million dollars that the Panthers would have to take a hit on besides that it's a contract that he is getting paid a lot of money and the team that acquires him has to realistically pay that in future years but if they're willing to they're willing to really invest in a young receiver that has a talent that just needs a new opportunity and needs more targets DJ Moore would be the guy some teams that could trade for him would be the Baltimore Ravens I know that's a rumor that popped up like you need some help right and so the Baltimore Ravens could be a team that could invest the Green Bay Packers have been talked about getting a receiver for so long they might still be in the Odo Beckham market come mid-November but it's looking like so DJ Moore could be a player being talked about by the Green Bay Packers the Kansas Adachives could also use more receivers the New York Giants as well I know that their receiving core has been injured and as well it just hasn't been working out with Kateria Stoney and the unlimited amount of snap stays getting Kenny Galladay the four-year 72 million dollar contract just not working so the Giants with them being five in one honestly like they could be going after DJ Moore and then maybe even the Tennessee Titans I know the Julio Jones experiment didn't work out so maybe they're kind of hesitant to to pay a high draft pick for DJ Moore but it could be a possibility that Moore could go to the Tennessee Titans player number three that could be traded is Ro Kwan Smith I think this was kind of obvious in the preseason when he flat out came out on Twitter and put out a statement saying like hey I love the Bears organization I'm thankful for my time in the windy city but I am requesting a trade to get out of Chicago because they don't want to sign him to a long-term contract he's one of the better young outside linebackers even though technically he hasn't been voted as a second team first team all-pro went to a Pro Bowl he's still a very very good defensive piece for the Chicago Bears and he's so far proven it this season like he's playing like Ro Kwan Smith only 25 years old in the last year of his contract so if a team really wanted to trade for him kind of like what the Eagles did for AJ Brown where they couldn't get contracts working out with the Tennessee Titans so they said hey we will trade for AJ Brown and we will pay him as well if Ro Kwan Smith goes to a team that wants to do the same thing with him that's a high possibility now the team that he goes to though you got to keep in mind they have to have a good amount of cap space so it's kind of hard to tell at this point in 2023 who's gonna have a lot of cap space moving forward just because a lot of these teams haven't really re-signed their big-name players so it's really hard to grasp but just looking at the perspective of team fits and teams that are competing that need a young linebacker to really step up their game the Baltimore Ravens have been talked about a lot the Miami Dolphins I'll say I'll throw them out there then New York Jets could use more pieces on that elite defense that they have and the Atlanta Falcons I mean don't count them out everybody expected them to be what one and five at this point and now they're three and three could have been four and two if that play against Brady whatever that Grady Jarrett call but still like the Atlanta Falcons could be in the running for Ro Kwan Smith who played at Georgia so you know born and raised in Georgia so the cap hit that the Bears would take by trading away Ro Kwan Smith would be nine point seven million dollars again sounds like a lot of money but in the grand scheme of things it's not like the Falcons eating up the cap space for Matt Ryan kind of money like it's a little bit less so he's gonna be a free agent at this point might as well just get some draft capital for him I don't think that you get anything more than a second rounder for Ro Kwan Smith so first rounder out of the table but a second rounder maybe like third rounder yeah I could realistically see that happening so kind of like DJ Moore second or third rounder for Ro Kwan Smith player number four news that just broke out Sean McVeigh actually just came out and said hey yeah we are actively shopping came acres we were listening to offers we wanted him to get a fresh start somewhere else just didn't work out I don't know whether it's like the Achilles or he's just frustrated with his role in the offense whatever it is they are looking for another running back and want to get rid of cam acres since he's only on his rookie deal that's only a 1.6 million dollar hit so not bad not bad at all and what makes cam acres a little bit more attractive is that he has two years left on his contract so he's not going to be free agent in 2023 2024 is when he's going to become a free agent so that kind of gives some teams a little bit more room to kind of see like a trial and error kind of thing hey is cam acres going to really work out I can trade like a low draft pick I think I'll honestly at this point the Rams with the way that acres has played I honestly think they'd be okay with like a fourth rounder at best and realistically he might be like a fifth or sixth rounder that you get for cam acres and some teams that could trade for cam acres would be the Atlanta Falcons I mean I know that they have Cordero Patterson he's on IR though if you want to do like a running back by committee approach I mean like the backup running backs for the Falcons cable Huntley Tyler out of gear sometimes they have their moments but it just really hasn't been working out for them so I mean you could pair Cordero Patterson with cam acres and that actually might be a good one to punch and then I'll also say the Raiders just because Josh Jacobs is on his last year with his contract already declined the 50 year option the way that they're playing them is like hey we don't really we're not playing you to preserve you for your future because we know that we're not going to resign you so we need a new running back and with two years on cam makers contract it could be again in 2023 as a workhorse or first string running back just play just see what he has and then let's see if we want to resign cam acres the last team I want to mention that could be interested in cam acres maybe this is a little bit of a stretch but could the Rams and the Panthers do a Christian McCaffrey cam acres kind of deal where the Rams are showing interest in Christian McCaffrey the Panthers need a running back replacement if they do trade away McCaffrey get cam acres and I know that you can't just do straight up McCaffrey for acres who would have to be hey I will trade cam acres and a second round pick for a Christian McCaffrey cam acres in a third round or whatever it may be like a package deal for McCaffrey and then the last player we want to talk about is another running back and that is Josh Jacobs we talked about him being declined his 50 year option on the last year of his contract I only see this happening though with the way that Jacobs is playing I only see this happening if the Raiders continue to lose they're one and four at this point if they drop to one and five do you think to yourself hey maybe we should trade away Josh Jacobs with the way that he's playing we don't have any intention of resigning him his contract is going to be too expensive with the way that he's playing let's shop him to a team that is willing to pay him a long-term contract extension and let's just get our hands rid of it and let's get a high draft pick out of it so I think the compensation you could get for Josh Jacobs if he continues to play the way that he is you could get a second round pick out of Jacobs I mean it's really friendly as far as the cap hit goes because he's again just like cam acres he's on his rookie contract so it's not that big of a hit but those are five players that could be traded realistically McCaffrey Moore Rokon Smith cam acres and Josh Jacobs if you have any other players and any other team destinations you guys want to mention down below I would love to hear your thoughts on where you think those players would go


Alumni report, what it's like teaching English in Austria. Between 2017 and 2018 after I had graduated with a bachelor's degree in German and English, I moved to Vienna, Austria to become an English teaching assistant through the Fulbright Group. I was placed at two schools in Lower Austria and taught around 14-15 classes each week for 50 minute periods. Coming into the situation, I honestly felt underprepared and confused as to what I was supposed to teach and how? The program attempted to orientate the teaching assistants, but in reality, there was much I did not know. After completing my TEFL certification course, I can now see many techniques that I was using either knowingly or unknowingly, and many which I could have been using. A course such as this one before I started teaching would have been of great benefit to both myself and the students, and I fully understand the requirement of having such a certification. The role as an English teaching assistant. My role was more of a cultural ambassador and I was rarely made to teach more rigid structures such as grammar being that I would only see each class every two weeks, and the teachers preferred I did more entertaining activities. I am now aware that I was implementing the ESA structures into my lessons unknowingly. For example, a lesson which went over well with most classes was one involving advertisements. I engaged the students by showing them an example of an advert and had them describe what they saw and give opinions, observances. We then worked to find different types of advertising, print, broadcast, media, etc., and the students wrote them down on the board along with other vocabulary. For more advanced groups, we would then learn the ways in which one should analyze an advertisement, who bought the spot, selling of ideas slash product slash service, persuasive tools ethos slash logos slash pathos, etc., I then would put the students into groups of two three and each would receive a large image of an advertisement. For less advanced groups, they would simply describe the image objectively using orientation terms, top right, bottom left, and what they liked, disliked about them. The more advanced groups would work to analyze the pieces. Each group would then present their advertisement to the class and the details therein. With the time remaining, each group would make their own advertisements, and these would be presented in the next class. What's interesting to myself, is that this plan followed the engage, study, activate techniques of teaching, without my knowledge of such a process. However, I see now that much of the study phase could have been improved with further study of the vocabulary, perhaps in the worksheet activity. The role of the teacher in the classroom. I quickly became aware of my stage presence as a teacher, and how much my attitude, gesturing, and proximity to the students affected them. I am a very animated person and therefore use a lot of gesturing. From this course, I realize that this may be more distracting than I had previously perceived. I also tend to walk around the room often while the students are working individually, or in groups. I think I should reduce this, as it may be disruptive, yet I need to find a comfortable median. In general, I feel the students respond well to my enthusiasm and engagement, but even they may not be aware of how my actions are affecting their learning. I will need to rethink how I give lessons, and really practice and study how to give a more rigid lesson on subjects such as grammar. As I have not had much experience in those activities. I am excited to start teaching again and to utilize these pedagogical tools and perspectives I have gained. Are you ready to teach English abroad? Speak with an ITTT advisor today to put together your personal plan for teaching English abroad. Send us an email or call us tollfree at 1-800-490-0531 to speak with an ITTT advisor today.


Welcome to the Cube. This is the first for us, John. Inside the Cube. Intel. We're inside a lot of stuff, but I don't think we've ever been inside the Cube. Intel inside. We tried to get Intel in the Cube multiple times. They have not returned our phone calls. Former Intel. Pat Gelsinger's been on three times. Oh, there you go. Well, Pat is a mentor of mine. He says he does an Intel bong before he goes to sleep every night. Is that right? We have that live. You have? Pat doing the bong? No, just talking about doing it. Oh, OK. I would pay money to hear Pat do the bong. John said it probably helps him sleep at night. Yeah, there you go. So what is the Intel data center group? Share with our audience. Well, Intel is organized into several different business groups. And recently, about less than a year ago, we actually formed the data center group, which is a merge of our server platforms group, where Intel has been working on Xeon processors in the server platform for over a decade. And our storage group, which is what I run for my boss, Kirk Scalgan, who runs the data center group, and our networking logic group. And all three of those divisions form the data center group. And it's because we believe that, and you can sort of see it from the VSP announcement today, that storage, networking, and compute, or servers, are actually becoming very converged in both architecture and in different ways of being used. And everything's being just sort of distributed and cloudy. And there's also a lot of innovation, as you can see by some of these really ridiculously awesome mergers going on around with great prices, right? Yeah, so you guys obviously just recently had a big acquisition, software acquisition. But it's known in Silicon Valley that you guys have been high on the whole software bandwagon for some time. And you guys are known for the chips. So talk about what's going on with the software side of the business on the integration, because you guys are bundling software into the hardware. How far has that come and where are you guys today? And what is that for your IT market? Yeah, well, I mean, software, not done, but the McAfee announcement is one of our biggest, is obviously a growing vector for the Intel corporation. We're still a building block supplier in the end on the silicon side and on the solution side, so we make chips primarily. But as we've been looking at growth, it turns out that there's quite a lot of value we think we can bring by adding certain key features in software that goes with those chips, kind of extending that software with silicon features. And that, I think, is an opportunity for us to add more value. But we'll do it in a way that's very open. We have all sorts of industry standards we drive too. And so you'll see us anchored on delivering great chips, and the architecture goes with that. We've been building driver software, and like we have a RAID software that goes with our upcoming chips for servers. Those types of building block softwares are tightly linked to our chips. And now, of course, we have some other areas, and the security which we think is a huge area of growth is one of the areas you'll see us focus on in addition to manageability. Manageability, security, and energy efficient performance nowadays is really a big part of Intel. So other than Moore's Law, what's driving your business? And again, how does that affect your IT? Yeah, well, I mean, Moore's Law is a religion with us. It's our culture. It's really hard, by the way, to make happen to double those transistors every two years. Thank you. It's actually quite, it's kind of not easy. But what's driving, like, I'll give you an example of what's driving my business today, is this explosion of digital data.  And I mean, look at the IDC report that just came out called the Digital Universe Study, and every year they come out with this and every year they up their numbers. But last year in May, they said there were almost 800 exabytes. Of data, digital data out there, which is a 10 with 18 zeros after it. We're talking zettabytes these days. It's unbelievable. Yeah, and I didn't know what a zettabyte was until recently, right? And so now, you know, they think it's going to grow 44x, which is actually faster than Moore's Law. And by 2020 and 10 years from now, they think it'll be 35 zettabytes. So that's definitely going to grow our business. It's a big deal.  Thanks for pointing that out. And we run out of storage all the time. We do. There's a 1080p video. We're putting out monster files.  But the question is, is that there's a big debate for the people who aren't in the business around understanding what's going on with virtualization. And when Paul Moritz comes out, he quotes the IDC study and says, there's more servers being virtual, a lot of shipments. More virtual shipments in servers than actually physical. The average person says, oh, that's bad for Intel. So clarify that, because we've said publicly, that's a great stat and gets people juiced up. But really, the data's not going away. The machine footprint is still continuing to grow. But just clarify that fallacy or the artificial debate. Yeah, yeah. Actually, we're big fans of virtualization. And we built actual core technologies into our processors and into our chip sets to virtualize both the processor itself and help it run faster and better and into the IO. And from our perspective, it's just, you know, even though we love Moore's Law, we love to solve everybody a processor per usage model, it actually makes a lot of sense. And so if you can consolidate your server infrastructure and run several virtual machines onto a device, you get great performance and you save a lot of power. And for us, you know, we think of it as, well, we'll just sell a better processor, right? So instead of selling a simpler processor, people tend to buy our dual processing or our four processing, our quad sockets. You know, not quad core, but quad sockets. 16-core, 18-core, 20-core solutions to run these, you know, Oracle databases, SAP, all these very high-end things.  You know, it's really being used for what some people call tier two, some sort of cast of build called crapplications. But, you know, tier two, you know, apps, simple apps, and we think that it's going to have some penetration limits.   So as you put Jim, more cores into the equation and maybe Flash also comes into play, what does that mean for I.O. and connect it to what you're seeing today with this Hitachi VSP? Talk about that a little bit. Yeah, well, so, I mean, the key thing about Flash in a storage application is data caching and some people call it tiering. And so today, before the world of NAND and non-volta storage, the fastest way you could get access to the disk to data was to concatenate hundreds of disks and put the data literally on the outside of those disks so that when it rotates around, you get the highest centrifugal motion. That was speed, right? And obviously, you know, you're talking about 200 I.O. ops on a disk. This is Intel GeekySpeak, I apologize.  It's just, you know, ridiculously different and better. And so it's being driven into the data center as a performance tier anchored on transactional database things. But, you know, once you have it, it's useful for a lot of other things. And you can see from the Hitachi VSP announcement today, it's sort of integral to the architecture, which we think is essential because it's hard for an IT person to sort of on-the-fly dynamically manage all this tiering. And it's really better if the storage box sort of owns that problem and sort of abstracts them away from it and does it logically based on their knowledge of the data. But we expect non-volta storage to be driven, you know, very, very steeply into a sort of external storage box, but into the data center in general. So you're a USPV current customer, is that right? Or a current USPV customer, a Hitachi customer of their previous platform? I'm sorry, I don't understand the PV. The predecessor? Oh, the predecessor? I actually don't know. Yeah, okay. I actually don't know. So Intel, so that makes a lot of sense. So just summarize the question for the folks out there. I said Intel actually is interested in virtualization, enabling virtualization because you sell more high-end processors and more stuff. Yeah. And just to tie back your earlier point, you guys have IP, specific IP in the silicon and you're going to wrap your software into that. You see that as that major. Yeah, yeah. And, you know, the data center's exploding, you know, and we're already in 90-ish percent of the servers run on Xeon for the target segments we identify. But you may not know this, but actually by the end of this year we're probably going to be 70% of the storage boxes out there. We'll be running on Intel processors. Who's left that doesn't run on Intel? Well, you try to make everybody happy. Even Oracle's running on Intel. So kind of the wild card question is, people are talking about this, is that people are building their own. Facebook is, you were talking about Facebook. And Facebook's making all their own stuff. Google makes their own machines. Facebook granted software they're building. But there's a trend to, you know, hey, Intel who? AMD, who's got the better lower power, you know, better everything. So talk about that opportunity and what's happening around that. Is it homebrew-like stuff? Or is it real? Yeah. Where's the market at on that? Well, you know, yes. So if you had shown my top 10 customer lists in the data center group five years ago or today, you wouldn't see guys. Now for us, we sell the chips and we sell them into OEM platforms. So this is HP and Dell and IBM and lots and lots of other companies who are building our products and then selling them off to the Facebooks and the Google's. We don't necessarily do chip directly to them. As a business model. But, you know, that being said, they tend to want to strip it down and do a lot of their own stuff in software. So they might buy just a basic server and then do a lot of cool things in software with it. But they'll buy a ton of them. And matter of fact, our top 10 list of customers includes if we measure it by consumption and measure includes Amazon and Google and these types of fuss that are in our top 10 and they weren't five years ago, 10 years ago. They didn't exist, right? The purpose built is a big message from Larry Allison when we're all this notion of integrating hardware and software. And as he said, my friend Steve Jobs referring to Steve's with Apple strategy. But Oracle's more of an incumbent. But is that the trend more appliances, more purpose built hardware? Or is it just a fad or a specific? Well, I don't know. I think it's certainly a trend to keep trying to take particular bottlenecks and pain points and there's just constantly new bottlenecks and pain points in the data center and build accelerators to solve them. But actually I think the thing that we're seeing is what people call convergence, right? Where the server, the networking and the storage boxes are concatenated together in their common management solution for them and they're even sometimes sold as a module. Pretested. Pretested, configured, whatever. And so that convergence, we think, is sort of logical for IT people because they touch it one time. But we also think that people want to have best of breed, right? So they want to be able to interoperate all these things, right? And people select to whoever they want for that convergence. And so I think we, being a chip supplier, our goal is to make sure architecture works great in any of those environments. And it's quite a deal. I mean, our Xeon chips are very different from our client chips, right? And of course we have the Atoms for the low end, right? And so we spend a lot of time and energy trying to figure out how to get specific technologies to these different boxes together. And Oracle is a great partner of ours. They just announced their new storage solution is using Intel architecture. Yeah, no spark inside. And so we consider that to be a good thing. But I think that's where I think you'll see it happen. You'll see, yes, definitely appliances, but I just think you'll also see this kind of converged platforms wrapped by an amazing amount of software. This digital footprint idea you mentioned earlier is pretty big. I mean the storage of digital media, content being one of them. It's mind-boggling to think that my Facebook photos will be there forever. And we have a historical record of digital content. Will that be the case, do you think?  Or will the photos be around forever? It's a little outside my expertise, frankly. I don't think I've ever really studied it. I think the world's been so focused on trying to keep up with the explosion of the data right now, frankly. No one that I know of is having a top of mind conversation about archiving and what you should get rid of. Like right now I'm just trying to run to keep up with the number of pictures being created. I took my son to a university tour. He grabbed my phone and he took a shot of the school mascot in front of him. And he had it posted to Facebook before I even got my phone back for him. Right? Thanks, Dad. It was amazing, right? And that's the type of stuff that's going on. So I don't know. I think it's going to be a lot of everything, and who knows how it's going to turn out. Good. Well, we're here with David Tuey, who's the general manager of the Intel data center group, talking about crystal ball, futures, current... Great to have you on theCUBE. You're the first Intel person on theCUBE. We've been trying to get someone from Intel for a couple of months now.  We're not... Oh, they're right down the street. I live in Palo Alto. Oh, yeah. Well, the world is coalescing around big waves like virtualization and Intel's at the center of that. So it's great to have you on. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts with us. Yeah, thank you. I have one more question for you. Well, I don't even know what a dark cloud looks like. But I'll tell you what we're doing with security. And we kind of feel like it's something we should take very seriously, because it's a worldwide concern, right? And people want their privacy and security. And so what we've been building, for example, into the Xeon processors is something we call Trusted Execution Technology, which is an ability to securely boot to a known virtual machine or OS, the PC. And you've probably seen some white papers on it. RSA and Archer announced a white paper back in January. Right. And the idea is that, you know, would you rather have a, frankly, it's to be simple, a secure cloud or an insecure cloud, right? It seems like a simple question to answer, right? But that core technology is, when you boot the OS, you don't want anybody in the middle between when you get that system started, when you get that OS up and running, and it takes control. And so Trusted Execution Technology is already a technology, and we've been investing in that for several years, actually. And now it's the software system that's starting to catch up to it. But those are the times of things we're trying to do. We don't put crypto in our chips. We put, like, accelerators and building blocks. But we do put security features in there.   And so we feel like it's something that we should offer. A lot of bad guys out there.


What's up everybody and welcome back here to the channel on torque drift on the mobile platform But today we're gonna talk about that fdr7 the that I've been building it is now pro status It's got a little bit of a livery and it rips but before we get into doing that and getting some tams with that car We're gonna talk a little bit about the update that's coming up And that is that a long getting junior Chelsea don't know for the fun havers They blast it out on Instagram Torch if a picture of them saying update coming in a few days Definitely super excited to see those cars coming in here Definitely going to be trying to get a hold of them myself and doing some episodes on that But today we're gonna be talking about that fd rx7 That is now a pro status car here in the game And as you can see it does have a little bit of a livery Why fab links torque drift energy, of course and the FD doorplacers will grab it on it so this car is definitely Up there when it comes to power and stuff like that. It's over a thousand horsepower We're running almost all full-pro except our intercooler and then of course For our front running all that except the brakes, which I got to get in The store in order to do that. So let's take a look at the store. See if we get some parts to buy For our pro status stuff We got nothing Now that we can buy So unfortunately, we cannot buy any pro status parts But like I said the FD is definitely a massive car now so we're gonna hit the track see what we can do with it and See show you guys exactly what's up. We got infinity at Irwindale Definitely a awesome track Cali Banks So FDR 7 run of those custom tires and see what we can do in the first run here on the infinity course So if you guys are enjoying torture if we should follow me in Instagram and Twitter all the fun description box below Looks like we got any nice S14 you go after very close power matched So let's see how we can do when starting third gear Just so we don't spin too much shift into fourth a Little bit of an hesitation on there, but dragon bumper kind of wavery through there was not a 100% settled in on that position right there Missed that clip gonna try and bring it up to the wall Get these final clips and get some wall rides infinity course definitely fun course You got to get it kind of perfect otherwise you're gonna hit the wall pretty hard So we got 92 on our lead so not a bad lead 92 to 48 wall tracking on entry So see what we can do in the chase position here with the FD. I Could start in second gear, but I tend to like starting in third just because it helps with the wheel spin on and on the beginning Oh, no, if didn't the wall get a catch up We cut the single out just to get some proximity And like I said, you got to be almost perfect or that definitely happens He kind of sent it into the wall too much RIP to his 14 And we're gonna finish that up so we did take the win on that We're probably gonna give him another chance because I didn't like my entry at all either so hopefully He's gonna want to go again. Maybe He definitely had a better chase, but I kind of screwed up So we're gonna give him another chance here on Cali Banks infinity We're gonna start this one in second gear this time Little a little slow lax entry, but kind of causing us to hit the wall Not as close to those as I'd like to be a little bit of a wall drag there Not the cleanest of runs here by any means this track definitely not my best and unfortunately We're gonna probably take the loss with this one Only a 68, but he dequeued so we will still take the win This car not that well set up for this track. I don't think so we're gonna head back see what other tracks there are GG sir to you. See what other tracks we can get into Here for today's episode what we got we got the slab We got jump. Let's take it to the jump. We got a jump drift So we're gonna take the FD to the jump drift see what we can do with it So like I said, if you guys like this make sure you follow me on Instagram and Twitter And if you guys keep wanting to see torture content, let me know down the comments I know you do we're gonna be bringing the update content as much as I can. That's a pretty nice 14 Got the same wheels as me Rocking those five spokes deep dish in the rear. I poke it out my fenders though We start us ourselves in second gear toward and forth initiate in Handle the jump pretty well over the hump. Oh Find the throttle so I don't totally write that off Pretty decent through that section Kind of tagging the wall staying a little bit off the wall here Would like to be a little bit closer But every time I say that I smack into the wall you guys know what you guys haze me in the comments But all right, you're right. Let's get closer taps the wall. I want to wish I was closer Rex 106 on the lead looks like slippy got a 56 So we're gonna try and chase this out He's rocking the no bumper I'm an orthodox entry for me, but I was trying to find the gearing. I need to adjust my Button parameters for gear up make it bigger and move the downshift so I don't accidentally downshift by mistake Oh Almost lost the bumper.  Oh So that's what happened man slippy slipped a little bit too far into the wall But we're able to come out with a very decent chase for the run here at the jump 133 to 92 got a pretty good chase run So we're gonna go see what other tracks we can come up with for today, or we'll try to jump one more time FD definitely a new favorite car of mine And I'm loving the little simple livery I got on here simple but effective Little rabbit on the FD plackers. I gotta put the numbers in those but just decided to do rabbit in there It's getting frustrated. We're trying to put evil rabbit in there Don't get the letters so small Apparently we're not gonna find anybody so we're gonna try this one more time. Oh, okay, I Think I just glitched the game devs I Think I did a thing Huge jump. I wonder if we're actually gonna have something to go against that was not the way to do that part and that out There we go So this car has definitely become my one of my favorite cars to drive right now I think it's replaced the 46 in my favorite car and favorite, you know chase car to run Keep true with that rotary to not switch into an LS. So did we have to we did have something to go against? It's like Robbie works. Don't even know what kind of car he is be rocking 88 Looks like a purple e30 So we do have something to go against Keep saying I switch my buttons. I gotta switch that. Oh That was a very bad entry Now I got to kind of make up ground because he was right on me in the lead position. So And somewhat make up points in this chase Being a little bit offline is kind of totally screwed up my flow All that wall tap didn't help either Probably take a loss on there because it was not a hundred percent where I need to be on the track Probably need to change some stuff around but we still took the win. Okay. All right. We still took the win So let's go switch up our controls real quick Move the left foot brake a little bit Switch it with clutch because I have that double-tap for clutch. So we're gonna go settings Controls customized so Move the clutch kick the break up top there There's been the break in this we're gonna move the break the clutch on the bottom So we're gonna move this we're gonna make the gear up A little bit bigger. We're gonna move the gear down all the way out of the way There we go We'll try that So we're gonna try this set up here I think we're gonna go to the slab to finish this episode off Hopefully you guys enjoyed this episode with this FD more episodes coming like I said with the updates and everything coming You guys will see it here and get my take on it if I get my hands on those RTRs I definitely will and let you guys know what I think about them But unfortunately We glitched the game again. All right, so we have something to go against not sure what they're driving, but kind of too soon on that Haven't run the slab in a minute So hard on that left foot break though. It's nice to have that big break there So don't usually downshift when I'm on these tracks So having downshift all the way down at the bottom is not gonna cause me a problem Just need to make sure I get up in the gears So I notice an ox entry, but nonetheless a solid run 115 to 70 So we're gonna follow this guy and chase looks like he's gotten s15 Trying to stay as close as I can We cut the single little there we go. Oh Big straighten up by him. We'll follow Double double tap for a clutch kick a clutch kick there.  I appreciate all the comments 155 to 85 five win streak Not a bad way to run today's episode. So as always, I thank you guys for watching. I'm evil rabbit I'll see you guys on track