From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of AWS ReInvent 2020, sponsored by Intel, AWS, and our community partners. Hello, and welcome to theCUBE virtual here with coverage of AWS ReInvent 2020. I'm your host, Justin Warren. And today I'm joined by Jay Snyder, who is the chief customer officer at New Relic J, welcome to theCUBE. It is fantastic to be back with theCUBE. One of my favorite things to do has been for years, so appreciate you having me. Yes, a bit of a CUBE veteran, been on many times, so it's great to have you with us here again. So you've got some news about New Relic and Amazon, or AWS, a strategic collaboration agreement, I believe. So maybe tell us a bit more about what that actually is and what it means. Yeah, so we've been partners with AWS for years, but most recently in the last two weeks, we've just announced a five-year strategic partnership that really expands on the relationship that we already had. We had a number of integrations and competencies already in place, but this is a big deal to us and we believe a big deal to AWS as well. So really takes all the work we've done to what I'll call the next level, it's joint technology development, where we're initially gonna be embedding New Relic One right into the AWS Management Console for ease of use and really agility for anyone who's developing and implementing a cloud strategy. Big news as well from an adoption relative to purchase power, so you can purchase straight through the AWS Marketplace and leverage your existing AWS spend. And then we're gonna really be able to tap into the AWS Premier Partner Ecosystem, so we get more skills, more scale as we look to drive consulting and skills development and any implementation for faster value realization and overall success in the cloud. So that's the high level, happy to get into a more detailed level if you're interested around what I think it means to companies, but just setting the stage, we're really excited about it as a company. In fact, I just left a call with AWS to join this call as we start to build out the execution plan for what the next five years look like. Fantastic, so for those who might be new to New Relic and aren't particularly across the field of observability, could you just give us a quick overview of what New Relic does and then maybe talk about what the strategic partnership means for the nature of New Relic's business? Yeah, so when I think about observability and what it means to us as opposed to the market at large, I would say our vision around observability is around one word and that word is simplification. So I talk to a lot of customers, that's what I do all the time. And every time I do, I would say that there's three themes that come up over and over. It's the need to deliver a customer experience with improved uptime and ever-improving improvements. It's the need to move more quickly to public cloud to embrace the scale and efficiency public cloud services have to offer. And then it's the need to improve the efficiency and speed of their own engineering teams so they can deliver innovation through software more quickly. And if you think about all those challenges and what observability is, it's the one common thread that cuts across all those, right? It's taking all of the operational data that your system emits and helps you measure and improve the customer experience. Your ability to move to public cloud and compare that experience before you start to after you get there, the effectiveness of your team before you deploy to after you get there. And it's all the processes around that, right? It helps you be almost able to be there before you're there there. I mean, if that makes sense, right? You'll be able to troubleshoot before the event actually happens or occurs. So our vision for this is like I talked about earlier is all about simplification and we've broken this down into literally three piece parts, right? Three products, that's all we are. The first is about having as much data as you possibly can. I talked about emitting that transactional and telemetry data. So we've created a telemetry data platform which rides on the world's most powerful database. And we believe that if we can take all of that data, all that infrastructure and application data and bring it into that database, including open source data and allow you to query it, analyze it and take action against it, that's incredibly powerful. But that's only part one. Further, we have a really strong point of view that anybody who has the ability to break production should have the ability to fix production. And for us, that's giving them full stack observability. So it's the ability to action against all of that data that sits in the data platform. And then finally, we believe that you need to have applied intelligence because there's so many things that are happening in these complex environments. You wanna be able to cut through the noise and reduce it to find those insights and take action in a way that leverages machine learning. And that for us is AI ops. So really for us, observability, when I talked about simplification, we've simplified what is a pretty large market with a whole bunch of products just down to three simple things. A data platform, the ability to operationalize and action against that data and then layer on top in the third layer that cake machine learning. So it can be smarter than you can be so it sees problems before they occur. And that's what I would say observability is to us.  I hope that makes sense. Yeah, there's a lot to dig into there. So let's start with some of that operational side of things because I've long been a big believer in the idea of cloud as being a state of mind rather than a particular location. And a lot of people have been embracing cloud. We know that for about 10 or so years and the size of reinvent has proven out what how popular cloud can be. So some of those operational aspects that you were talking about there about the ability to react. I particularly liked that you were saying that anyone who can break production should be able to fix production. That's a very different way of working than what many organizations would be used to. So how is New Relic helping customers to understand what they need to change about how they operate their business as they adopt some of these methods? Well, it's a great question. There's a couple of things we do. So we have an observability maturity framework by which we deploy and I don't want to bore the audience here, but needless to say it's been built over the last year, year and a half by using hundreds of customers as a test case to determine effectively that there is a process that most companies go through to get to benefits realization. And we break those benefit categories into two different areas. One around operational efficiency and agility. The other is around innovation and digital experience. So you were talking about operational efficiency. And in there, we have effectively three or four different ways and what I call boxes on how we would double click and triple click into a set of actions that would lead you to an operational outcome. So we have learned over time and applied a methodology and approach to measure that. So depending on what you're trying to do, whether it's meantime to recover or meantime to detect or if you've got hundreds of developers and you're finding that they're ineffective or inefficient and you want to figure out how to deploy those resources to different parts of the environment so you can get them to better use their time. It all depends on what your business outcome and business objective is. We have a way to measure that current state your effectiveness, apply rigor to it and then design a process by using New Relic One to fill in those gaps. And it can take on the burden of a lot of those people. I hate to say it because I'm not looking to replace any individual. It's really about freeing up their time to allow them to go do something in a more effective and more efficient manner. So I don't know if that's answering the question perfectly but... I don't think there is a perfect answer to it. Every customer is a bit different. So this is exactly why we developed the methodology because every customer is a little different. The rationale though is... Common themes... Yeah, so the rationale... There's a lot of common... I was going to say there's a lot of common themes. So what we've been able to develop over time with this framework is that we've built a catalog of use cases and experiences that we can apply against you. So depending on what your business objectives are and what you're trying to achieve we're able to determine and really auger in there and assess you what is your maturity level being able to deliver against these. Are you even using the platform to the level of maturity that would allow you to gain this benefit realization? And that's where we're adding a massive amount of value. And we see that every single day with our customers who are actually quite surprised by the power of the platform. I mean, if you think traditionally back not too far two or even three years people thought of New Relic as an APM company. And I think with the launch this summer, this past July with New Relic One we've really pivoted to a platform company. So while a lot of companies love New Relic for APM, they're now starting to see the power of the platform and what we can do for them by operationalizing those use cases around agility and effectiveness to drive cost and make people be more useful and purposeful with their time so they can create better software. Yeah, I think that's something that people are realizing a lot more lately than they were previously. I think there was a lot of TCO analysis that was done on a replacement of FTA basis. But I think many organizations have realized that well, actually that doesn't mean that those people go away. They get re-tasked to do new things. So any of these efficiency, you start with efficiency and it turns out actually being about business agility about doing new things with the same people that you have who now don't have to do some of these more manual and fairly boring tasks. Yeah, and Justin, if this cube interview thing doesn't work out for you, we're hiring some value engineers right now. It sounds like you've got the talk track down perfectly because that's exactly what we're seeing in the marketplace. So I agree. So give us some examples if you can of maybe one or two of things that you've seen that customers have used New Relic where they've stripped out some of that make work or the things that they don't really need to be doing. And then they're turning that into new agility and have created something new, something more innovative. Have you got an example you could share with us? You know, it's funny. I just finished doing our global customer advisory boards, which is rough and tough, about a hundred customers around the world. So we break it into the three theaters. And we were just talking with a particular customer. I don't want to give their name, but the session was called, we broke the sessions into two different buckets. And I think every customer buys products like New Relic for two reasons. One is to either help them save money or to help them make money. So we actually split the sessions into those two areas. And I think you're talking about, how do we help them save money? And this particular company that was in the media industry talked at great length about the fact that they are a massive news conglomerate. They have a whole bunch of individual business units. They were decentralized and non-standardized as it related to understanding how their software was getting created, how they were defining and determining meantime to recover, performance metrics, all these things were happening around them in a highly complex environment. Just like we see with a lot of our customers, right? The complexity of the environments today are really driving the need for observability. So one of the things we did with them is we came in and we apply the same type of approach that we just discussed. We did a maturity assessment for them. And we found a variety of areas where they were very immature in using capabilities that existed within the platform. So we're able to light up a variety of things around insights. We're able to take more data in from a logging perspective. And again, I'm probably getting a little bit into the weeds for this particular session, but needless to say, we looked at the full gamut of metrics, events, logs and traces, which wasn't really being done in an observability strategy manner and deploy that across the entire enterprise. So created a standard platform for all the data in this particular environment. Across 14 different business units. And as a byproduct, they were able to do a variety of things. One, the uptime for a lot of their customer facing media applications improved greatly. We actually started to pivot from actually driving cost to showing how they could quote unquote make money because the digital experience they were creating for a lot of their customers reduced the time to glass, if you will, for clicking the button and how quickly they could see the next page to the next page or whatever online app they were looking to get dramatically. So as a byproduct of this, they were able to repurpose to the point you made, Justin, dozens of resources off of what was traditionally maintenance mode and fighting fires and a reactive capability towards building new code and driving new innovation in the marketplace. And they gave a couple of examples of new applications that they were able to bring to market without actually having to hire any net new resources. So again, I don't want to give away the name of the company, maybe it was a little too high level, but it actually plays perfectly into exactly what you're describing. That is a good example of one of those that one of the, it's always nice to have a specific concrete customer doing one of these kinds of things that you describe in generic terms, okay, no, this is being applied very specifically to one customer. So we're seeing those sorts of things more and more. Yeah, and I was going to give you, I thought about in advance of this session, what is a really good example of what's happening in the world around us today. And I thought of a particular company that we just recently worked with, which is Chegg. I don't know if you're familiar with Chegg, if you've heard of them, but they're an education technology company based in California. And they do digital and physical textbook rentals. They do online tutoring and online customer services. So Justin, if you're like me or the rest of the world and you have kids who are learning at home right now, think about the amount of pressure and strain that's now being put on this poor company Chegg to keep their platform operational 24-7, seven days a week so that students can learn at pace and keep up, right? And it's an unbelievable success story for us. And one that I love because it touches me personally because I have three kids all doing online learning in a variety of different manners right now. And we talked about it earlier, the complexity of some of the environments today. This is a company that you would never guess, but they run 500 microservices and a highly complex technical architecture, right? So we had to come in and help these folks and we were able to reduce their meantime to recover because they were having a lot of issues with their ability to provide a seamless performance experience because you can imagine the volume of folks hitting them these days and reduce that meantime to recover by five X. So it's just another example where we're able to say, it's a real world example where you're able to actually reduce the time to recover to provide a better experience and whether or not you want to say that saving money or making money, what I know for sure is it's giving an incredible experience so that folks in the next generation of great minds aren't focused on learning instead of waiting to learn, right? So very cool. That is very cool. And yes, I have gone through the whole teaching kids at the end which is, it was disruptive not necessarily in a good way but we adapted and learned how to do it in a new way which is, you know, it was a lot easier towards the end than it was at the beginning. I'd say we're still getting there at the Snyder household Justin, we're still getting there. Practice makes perfect. Yeah, thank you. So for organizations like Chegg that might be looking at Chegg and thinking, hmm, that sounds like a bit of a success story. I want to learn more about how New Relic might be able to help me. How should they start? Well, there's a lot of ways they can start. I mean, one of the most exciting things about our launch in July was that we have a new free tier. So for anybody who's interested in understanding the power of observability, you can go right to our website and you can sign up for free and you can start to play with New Relic One. I think once you start playing for it, we're gonna find the same thing that happens to most of the folks that do that. They're gonna play more and more and more and they're gonna start to really embrace the power. And there's an incredible New Relic University that has fantastic training online. So as you start to dabble in that free tier, start to see what the power and the potential is, you'll probably sign up for some classes.  So that is one of the easiest ways to get exposed to it. So certainly check us out at our website and you can find out all about that free tier and what observability could potentially mean to you or your business. And as part of the AWS re-invent experience, are they able to engage with you in some way? They can definitely come by our booth, check us out virtually, see what we have to say. We'd love to talk to them and we'd be happy to talk to you about all the powerful things we're doing with AWS in the marketplace to help meet you wherever you are in your cloud journey, whether it's pre-migration, during migration, post-migration or even optimization. We've got some incredible statistics on how we can help you maximize and leverage your investment in AWS. And we're really excited to be a strategic partner with them. And you know, it's funny for me to see how observability, this platform can really touch every single facet of that cloud migration journey. And you know, I was thinking originally as I got exposed to this, it would be really useful for identity met, entity relationship management at the pre-migration phase and then possibly at the post-migration phase as you try to baseline and measure results. But what I've come to learn through our own process of moving our own business to the AWS cloud, that there's tremendous value everywhere along that journey, that's incredibly exciting. So not only are we a great partner, but I'm excited that we will be what I call first and best customer of AWS ourselves, New Relic, as we make our own journey to the cloud. Well, fantastic. And I encourage any customers who might be interested in New Relic to definitely go and check you out as part of the show. Thank you, Jay, Jay Snyder from New Relic. You've been watching theCUBE virtual and our coverage of AWS re-invent 2020. Make sure that you check out all the rest of theCUBE coverage of AWS re-invent on your desktop, laptop, your phone, wherever you are. I've been your host, Justin Warren, and I look forward to seeing you again soon.


Here's another Thrive Tip from Kaiser Permanente and Fox 12. We all know exercise is good for us especially as we age. Being active in your senior years is the best way to maintain strength, stamina, and overall good health. By age 75 only one in three seniors takes part in regular physical activity. This activity can decrease your strength and stamina and make you more susceptible to chronic disease, or make it harder to recover from illness or surgeries. It's much easier to get moving once you know how much your health and well-being depend on it. Activities like swimming, yoga, tai chi, and walking are great choices. You could also rent a fitness video at the library or participate in classes at your local community center. The most important thing is to find something you enjoy and make it part of your daily routine. Even if you haven't been active before, it's never too late to get moving. Staying active will keep you healthy, strong, and help you feel young at heart. This has been another Thrive Tip sponsored by Kaiser Permanente and Fox 12.


So in this last video for lecture 40 in our lecture series here, we're gonna do the same stuff that we've done in the last couple of lectures. Like we did with the integral test and the comparison test, it's not just good enough to know the convergence of the series. At some point we might wanna know how, what the series is actually equal to, what's the limit of that, of those partial sums. And so the convergence test allows us to know that the series converges, so the limit exists, but what is that limit? Now, so like we've done before, let's assume we have a series to take the sum where n equals one to infinity of a sub n. And let's say that we know that the series is convergent so that it adds up to be some value s. Well, since it converges, we can use the partial sum sequence to estimate that. So s sub n will be the partial sum where you take k equals one to n of a sub k. There's a typo there, sorry. And so we're gonna use the partial sums to estimate the series, but how good is the error, right? We use the remainder rn, which is the difference of sn minus one. And like we've seen before, if you take sn, which is the whole series, minus the first n terms, you'll get a sum starting at n plus one going off towards infinity. So the remainder term itself is a series. That's the framework we're having like before. But let's suppose that we know that the series is convergent using the alternating series test. So we have an alternating sequence.  It's decreasing the absolute series and it decreases towards zero. So using the assumptions, the notation we have before b n will be our absolute series. So what we're saying here is that b n is decreasing. So b n plus one is less than b n and the b n's converge towards zero. So these are the assumptions we get from the alternating series test. So this is actually one of the reasons why we wanted to prove the alternating series test. It's not just to prove its validity, but it turns out that the things we learned while we were trying to prove the alternating series test actually help us out right here. So what we saw here is that if you look at the remainder term itself as a series, it'll be an alternating series.  We don't actually know. It depends on where we stop. Do we stop at an even number in or odd number? But with the proof, it didn't matter whether you start positive or negative. So as this puppy right here is an alternating series in its own right, we saw some important inequalities here that this first term is the largest term in the sequence since we're decreasing towards zero. And as we start adding more terms, we actually will shrink from where we are at a n plus one. And so in fact, the sequence, the remainder, rn, will be bounded above by b in plus one. So that is, you have a n right here, that could be positive or negative, so take the absolute value. The remainder, rn, will be bounded above by b in plus one. So as long as the next term in the sequence of an alternating sequence is sufficiently small, that'll guarantee that our partial sums here are sufficiently accurate. This is gonna be really nice. And let's look at a specific example. Let's find the sum of the series where we take n equals zero to infinity of negative one to the n over n factorial. Now, some things to note here is that this series starts at zero as opposed to one. That's not a huge consequence for us. We do have to remember that a zero factorial is equal to one by definition. That's not zero. So this thing is defined at n equals zero. But the first term doesn't really matter if it converges at zero or converges at one or converges at 17, whatever, right? So be aware that we're doing one here. So if we wanna find the sum of the series, we actually have to first figure out is this thing even convergent? Is this thing convergent at all? Now, if I was looking at this series, I actually would use something called the ratio test, which we'll talk about in lecture 41 here to determine the convergence there. But as we don't know the ratio test yet, what we actually can do is we can prove it's convergent using the all-training series test. So look at the absolute sequence, one over n factorial. It is bigger than zero, it's positive, and it's gonna be less than n, right? And that's because n factorial is gonna be bigger than n. So the reciprocals go the other way around, one over n factorial is less than one over n. And so notice in this situation here that our series, the one on the right here one over n is gonna go toward zero as n goes to infinity, right? And so by the squeeze theorem, this also shows us that one over n factorial would go off toward zero. So that's a way of showing, that's a way of showing that the sequence one over n factorial will go to zero, it goes to zero and it happens in this decreasing manner as well. And so we get by the all-training series test since one over n factorial will decrease toward zero, we get by the all-training series test that it's convergent. So the answer would be yes, yes by all-training series test. Like I said, we wouldn't have to do this sort of squeeze theorem argument right here when we have the ratio test in hand. Use a squeeze theorem to help us get that limit. But the all-training series test could be used here as well. So almost we can determine one over n factorial decreases toward zero and we do that by sandwiching it between two decreasing sequences toward zero. All right, so we got its convergent, great. So we can approximate the series using partial sums but how accurate is it gonna be? Well, the accuracy depends on our remainder term, right? How big is the remainder term? Well, since we want this to be accurate to three decimal places, our error needs to be no worse than 0.001 which is the same thing as one over 1,000 which is the same thing as one over 10 cubed. This last figure right here comes into play because we're trying to be accurate to three decimal places, right? But as this is an all-training series, we proved it was convergent by the all-training series test then the remainder will actually be bound above by this bn plus one. That is, for getting the negative signs, this needs to be bigger, our bn plus one term is one over n plus one factorial. So when is, those are the players in play here, one over n plus one factorial needs to be less than one over 1,000. So if we think about that for a moment, we have one over n plus one factorial is less than 1,000. Taking the reciprocals, we see that n plus one factorial needs to be greater than 1,000. Now, how do you get rid of the factorial symbol? It really just comes down to looking at the sequence, right? If we look at the sequence of factorial numbers n versus n factorial, zero factorial is one, one factorial is one, two factorial is two. It might sound like it starts off slowly but this thing actually grows quite rapidly. Three factorials, six, four factorials, 24. Go a little bit farther down. Five factorial is 120, six factorial is 720. So that actually is really close to 1,000. I anticipate the next one's gonna jump over. So seven factorial is, let's see, what is that one, 5,040? So winner, winner chicken dinner right there. We see that n plus one factorial will be greater than 1,000 only if n plus one is greater than or equal to seven, right? And so subtracting one n needs to be greater than equal to six. That's pretty nice, right? In order to be accurate to three decimal places, we only have to choose n to be greater than six. We only need six terms here. So our series, our series, right? It equals zero to infinity. Do be aware we started zero here. You have negative one to the n over n factorial. This will be approximately the same thing as s sub six which is just gonna look like one. Well, you're gonna get one over zero factorial minus one over one factorial, plus one over two factorial, minus one over three factorial, plus one over four factorial, minus one over five factorial, plus one over six factorial. So we take those numbers here and so we're gonna get the numbers we had here. We're gonna get one over one, one over one. Sorry, one, you're gonna get one over one, minus one over one. Notice the first two just cancel each other out entirely. They're donors. So the next thing we get here comparing our list, we're going to get one half minus one sixth plus one 24th minus one over one 20 and plus one over 720. That's gonna take a little bit more to do. I would put that in a fraction. If you do, sorry, put that into a calculator. The fraction you would get would be 53 over 144 or a decimal expansion is probably more appropriate here. This thing would be approximately 0.368056. So that's the sum of this number right here. And according to our estimate, our estimate will be no worse than B7, which is one over 5,040, which is approximately 0.0002. So while we required it to be accurate to three decimal places, we are almost accurate to four decimal places. And so this alternating series actually converges quite quickly. And we can actually find out its error bound much, much simpler. And so I actually like trying to compute the error of alternating series compared to some of the other techniques we did. Because for the integral test, it's a little bit more complicated because it involves counting some integrals. We'll do some other stuff later on with like Taylor's inequality, that's applicable. But whenever a series is alternating, you're gonna wanna use this error bound estimate to determine how accurate your estimate is. It's gonna turn out to be the best one possible. I mentioned already that and to determine the convergence of this series actually is a lot easier using something called the ratio test. And so in our next lecture 41, we will introduce both the ratio test and the root test as one, some final convergence test for series. And honestly, they're kind of my favorite, best for last in this chapter.


Well, good afternoon to everybody I want to to start by sending a warm Salute from our president and President de Moreno couldn't be here. He's preparing our annual meeting so he Invite us the technical team to chair today the good thing is that He brought with us a lot of experience in the region that we hope we will inspire some of the solutions to the difficult questions that have been posed by By a doctor today. I want to thank the government of Ireland Did he sell and the broadband Commission for inviting us today and for its warm welcome But I wanted to extend also that thank you to the city of Dublin and the Dubliners who have been absolutely fantastic in welcoming us We invited today Professor Michael K who has been working actively in the last months and I think that's not need an introduction to help us structure The discussion and help us to put a good document after a fruitful discussion I wanted also to thank the members of the Commission working group that send us Very very useful comments and ideas that have been critical to set the course of the discussion that we're going to have today As you have in our paper in front of you we structure and again agenda that It's a structure in the way that we wanted to make this a very active dialogue We wanted to be an opportunity to bring ideas and to have a fruitful discussion So in order to do so what we did was to think about opening Presentation to warm us all up and that will be done by Martin cave And I think that would set some ideas for the dialogue and I think is a very motivating Point of departure for the discussion and we don't want to expect after a long set of presentations to have your reactions So what we think is immediately after he does the presentation if we can make a short a round of Reactions to his presentation on his paper will be ideal and that will be followed by some Three presentations that have been brought to us today that I think bring very interesting ideas that we have to consider One by Alcatel Lucent and other by Intel and the other by Recipco And after that we will have an open discussion I will pass the floor to to Martin cave to help us to Direct the discussion to make sure that he squeeze out of all the members of This group all the ideas for the benefit of the final document that we start to Develop us we go along and finally I would like to close with some agreements on the basics Direction and contents of the document Setting the next step is steps and more important with a very clear timetable to make sure that we do a good job And we do it on time One thing as you might see and I skip the coffee break and that was intentional not to Deprive you from the coffee But actually we thought that the dialogue could flow as we go and we're trying to See how it goes if we stay here and we discuss the coffees open or for us outside. I understand so if somebody sees that Well, you see that everybody is sleeping We will make sure that we change the plan, but we hope that that will not be the case So taking on where dr. Ture left his introductory remarks I think it's clear that the financial investment needs a huge The numbers go runs in the trillions numbers come from 30 trillion 50 trillion And we don't know even what that Intels I think when you see that it seems almost impossible to achieve and I think part of the Task of this commission is to set the path that this is possible and could be finance But one thing that is clear is that we require the action of the public sector and the private sector and That brings me to one idea that I wanted to propose today and Is what is the purpose of this document? Who is the audience for this document is what is what we want? And we thought why don't think about these ideas under the questions of Dr. Ture that the document creates a path for dialogue and action between the public and the private sector and Usually we can do a document that is academic and very very solid We can do one that all this audience is like preaching to the choir But they are actors that require and need and want a clear discussion for the future I think that remains in the public sector My experience working line America and the Caribbean and I want to overextend that shows that we have Excellent dialogue with the telecommunication ministers But we the ones that we wanted to bring to the table is the policymakers and particularly the ministry of finance Those are the ones that take the decisions on finance So if we make this document a very solid document on the issues that we want to raise But in a way that is a live document that we could discuss with them in search for common action I think will be a success So we know that the financial needs are huge and we know that the private sector will provide the majority of Such finance, but it needs a framework and a regulatory environment that allow the private sector to do so so how we can attract the attention of the Public actors the policymakers and I think despite the fact that this huge number on how much we need on the public On on on the finance and investment I think one thing that we have to underline is what is the cost of not doing it Which I think present the case not only about the huge and almost Uncertainable task of getting the 50 billion dollars But also that there's no option that for the government and policymakers in their own countries There's no way to avoid the cost of not financing this and on this I wanted to bring something that comes in the context of the millennium development goals to is that the digital divide Nowadays is also the social divide and I think in a connected and global society the digital divide actually enlarges This social divide. So this is an urgency of the matter for policymakers and society To attend to this matter. We cannot overlook it. I think Dr. Ture pointed out that this is not about commerce or economic transaction This is very much the tool for social interaction and the interaction of the between the government and its citizens So it is very very important to attend to this matter Not because of how much we need to raise, but the cost that we will pay if we don't On this I think is very important from the point of inclusion talk about that socio-demographics to matter Financial solutions will change depending where you're going to or who you're going to reach and how the population is deployed And on that very short. I wanted to talk about Not only that we should talk about not only how to finance supply But also how to make sure that we have Finance for demand that we have an effective demand and I mentioned with that Not only access but also adoption and use and I think today We're going to have a very very interesting discussion on things that are being done, which are extremely innovative So again thinking about I wanted to propose that we address the questions that Dr. Ture put to the table and we think about those in How to present public intervention tools with high productivity hopefully low cost and Possible implementation so we can present social sort of a path or menu for very very different countries to start a very productive dialogue and With a very clear presentation of facts and options. So the path for action is is is clear So I invite apart from the very technical discussions that in the final report We're very aware of the audience when we want to make this not an excellent document but a live document that actually we can bring with us and I with us meaning you and I mean the Development banks like the one that I work with in which you can go to go and present something that instead of being these Panic number that will paralyze everybody is there's a way of moving ahead and there are some excellent ideas Because we have to know that there's no going to be one solution even best practices are only Illustrative of things that could happen. We have to fit into national strategies So one solution does not fit all and we but we have the opportunity to influence those national strategies and Provide solutions that fit in them So again, I think we have the opportunity to identify direct actions for public sector intervention Join actions for public and private Interventions private sector innovation and also an opportunity to see how we can tap and tap resources a Final point that I wanted to do is that in my long experience working with Developing countries and bridging public and private sector One thing that is not only what to do, but how to do it The road to success is exactly that I wrote and if we don't think about how you go about those steps My experience is that change takes place extremely Slowly and all almost always in a very ineffective way so I Encourage us to think about at some point institutional arrangements For change is not only that the institutions are solid are good the regulation is good If we want to have change we have to think what is institutional arrangement to make that change happen How to put all the actors together and who's going to take care that that happens? I think we can do that the contribution to the discussion on the on the progress ahead will be huge So with that I thank you very much again for the honor To the IDB to to chair this this group and let's put ourselves to work and with that I am I would like to pass the floor to Martin cave


Why do you think they're doing this? Why would they be bringing in these tens of thousands of people 20 buses a day? A thousand more per day. Why would they be doing this and what's your message? The only reason that I can see that they would be doing this is to replace us and we say Trump 2024 Because Trump is the only one who's going to do something about this and partner with all of America. This is this This is where all of America Has got to come together and put a stop to this We have to send these people back where they come from or this is going to explode violently it's going to explode on multiple fronts and The mayor and his governor doesn't care And since they don't care then we must go red We must link up with all of America and and we care and we have to do something about it We coming for every electoral official that did step up and all those that that supported this mass I Mean wipe out of our Communities we coming for you by the time Trump gets ready to to run in November Chicago is gonna look like a sea of red when that Democratic National Convention get here You're gonna see so many red t-shirts that you're gonna think you in Texas enough is enough We just can't give it away to foreign nationals No, no other country's gonna allow it guys to cut in and do the same thing that's happening here You have American citizens of African-American descent That have built this country and built the great city of Chicago They are the barred shoulders that built this city and they are being Disrespected Disrespected by the Biden regime the entire Uniparty the globalist because now they're forcing illegal invaders into a city that doesn't have the resources to care for its citizens in health care and education and police protection and Economics and anything and now they have to bear the brunt to it And the two gullies progressive whites that run this deal are too godless to have been there just like they're not in the upper East side of New York or the upper West side. They're not out by Northwestern University It's something in their minds that makes them believe that They'll do this to us and we do nothing in return. This is not just for Chicago for us We've reached all across the country to send them a message. We're gonna flip America red We're gonna send the strongest message to the Democratic Party that black America black Chicago has ever seen Black America is about to rise up now that we are the mothers and fathers We're saying Trump 2024 across America and we asked Trump to come to Chicago come here and walk these streets with us And we'll put thousands behind him as he walked the streets and that's a that's a fact. That's a promise