Hi everyone, Joe for jazby's casebreaks.com. Happy new release day. We got 2021 Panini certified football eight box picker team Two coming at you all card ship big. Thanks to SC for getting us to Brakesville On pick your team to second half of the case that we opened up a little bit earlier today and Thanks everyone else of course From first spot to last spot and all the spots in between. Thank you for getting in All right, remember we marked all the boxes PYT to so we all know they're from the fresh case From me from the same case that is let's see what we got Yeah, I should I should Five cards per pack ten packs per box two autographs and two memory memorabilia cards per box on average that little league world series on in the background and it's a It's the Torrance team Torrance, California. They're not too. This team is not too far away from this, California playing South Dakota Let's go, California You got a ticket in Brakesville USA Darren Porter the cops there don't play. Yeah Sometimes hey, listen sometimes people have a great time in Brakesville Sometimes it can be rough All right first box Good luck. We got out of 99 James Robinson Ian book to 99 and we got Russell Wilson 71 out of 99 dangerous going to Sean B and Seattle Ian book will go to the Saints that'll be for David and the James Robinson will go to the Jaguar That'll be for Jared and the Jags Tom Brady to a delvin cook to 249 cam acres to 199 Cam acres Ram Steven Davidson delvin cook to 249 for Alan and the Vikings and Tom Brady TV for TV mark s nice patch Jalen Darden nice patch nice auto 215 out of 299 Buccaneers there's a trailance Insert These look pretty sharp. This will go to Victor and the Niners and a Zach Wilson New generation rally 49 out of 299 Wilson Wilson Adam Cuperman with his jets J ETS jets jets jets J J Watt to 149 looking weird in that Cardinals uniform doesn't look right There it is It's on a football card. It must be true Alex with the Cardinals Joseph Osai to 399 and we got an Ian book rookie roll call autograph roll call 76 out of 99 David Duffy book at Eric Stokes to 299 It's not related to Wasn't there a wasn't there a Brandon Stokes in the NFL? Maybe not But there was another stokes. I thought there was another Eric's there was a Eric Stokes You know Stokes is mixed up probably not My thing in a Brandon Stokes. Oh I'm thinking of Stokely.  It's you get you in the fields JJ Stokes, maybe Any relation to JJ Stokes? All right, good luck my homies Patrick Mahomes seal of approval 44 out of 199 KC Aaron with the Chiefs Derek Carter 299 for the Raiders and Another Saint Jimmy Graham dual relic Aqua 14 out of 50 That's David Duffy in the Saints. All right first of many I know there's been some Mahomes base cards Aaron, but we've got bigger fish to fry We want to see some parallels. You know what I mean? Deandre Hopkins to 249 maybe some ink To 149 run CMC That's a TJ with cat team mojo Carolina and Hop going to Alex and the Cardinals Whoo More Cardinals. There's a freshman fabric three-color patch nonograph Rondale Moore to 249 Yeah, one of the hallmarks of I've said this before I'll say it again one of the hallmarks of certified football Is that a lot of times the higher numbered cards? You still get nice some nice color in those patches We got Neum Heinz fabric of the game Colts 7 out of 99 It'll be for Adam and Indianapolis Cam Acres Stafford Echler and a Devon DuVernay for the Ravens mirror signature 16 out of 25 Last spot mojo strikes again 70% of the time last spot mojo hits 100% of the time SC picking up the Ravens There you go, Stephen Oliver has Has the Chargers he's looking for maybe some Justin Herbert parallels second-year Justin Herbert's and the quitty pay goes to the Colts as well 249 Oh Third base coach got knocked down by a foul foul ball Matt Ryan to 149 Whoo, where did he catch it? Did he that was a rocket? Oh, that's fair. Come on, California There's Monty Rice to 199 All right next box pick your team to Pick your team three will be a half case from a fresh case Pick your team for obviously the second half of that case and after those sell out and they will tonight. They will sell out After they sell out we can post some more California giving up a run. Come on, California Wait, can we? Can we bet on the literally on the world series games? There's an offshore that has to give lines on a on a literally game, right? It's not that Not that I would do such a thing Can't bet on kids for Kenny No, Aaron. You didn't see one on DraftKings. I mean, maybe it's Maybe more off-shores would probably be doing it. Yeah Vegas probably can't DraftKings probably can off-shores probably can oh, yeah off-shores. You definitely can't All right, maybe next time I'm not gonna handicap little league teams, but I'll uh I'll put like lunch money on Torrance There's Shane Bouchel, although I they're probably gonna be they're probably might be favorites. They've been looking pretty good D'Shawn Jackson certified gamers dual relic to 249 I mean if you actually knew what you were doing Aaron the with literally handicapping There's probably a lot of edges that you can probably get Not gonna go that far Tony with the Eagles Like Michigan's plus 148 and the are against Hawaii Hawaii's minus 178 And who's setting these lines is Tom Brady and a Nice rookie auto I'm a much thicker card stock. I was surprised by this five out of 25 Jalen Phillips rookie auto Big heavy card stock here Maybe 180 perhaps that's gonna go to The Porter house steak and the Miami Dolphins you go Darren the Damien Harris 99 James Robbins into 75 And a Michael Carter three color patch and autograph 18 out of 99 for For Adam and his jets Maybe we'll find the guy that hands off the ball to him James Robinson for Jared and the Jaguars Damien Harris for yeah Karen and her Patriots Javonda Williams 399 There's a quan Barkley Hopefully a hopefully a nice comeback season for him couple Justin Herberts for Oliver There's Simi Feoko to 249 for David and Dallas and say quan will go to the Giants Steven Davidson. They got Tyron Smith to 249 Dallas Played of the whistle Hollywood. We still have a lot of box to go Fourth box foul pitch that went off the coach. He took it off his hand. It's good reflexes. He almost caught it Played of the whistle faults. We're not even halfway through this side We're not even halfway through the side You can start you can start getting concerned when you're going down to like the last box or two CD lamp to 149 Devonte Parker to 149 Marquis Brown another Raven 125 out of 299 last spot mojo SC with the Ravens Jamar Jefferson another thick card. That's two out of three Jamar Jefferson for Detroit Patrick Davis with the Lions and our first train whistle of the break two out of three Patrick all aboard the Big Head Express Nice at Jamar Jefferson Joseph Asai to 399 Right at him exactly Yeah, they must hate Zach Wilson NFL Shields in this set Jerry Judy to 299 and I think this is Certified ground. That's a super short print Which is new to this set It's on a slightly thicker card stock than a regular card That's a certified ground Lights Camara action David Duffy and the Saints According to cardboard connection calm This is a super short print Certified air is another short print as well. Well, I feel like there was a third One that was a super short print certified air and certified ground and then scoring machines I don't know if I've seen a scoring machine yet, but scoring machines is also a super short print According to cardboard connection calm behind Alvin Cook is Zach Wilson. There it is freshman fabric two color patch and autograph 75 out of 75 for Adam and the Jets Nice, there it is. Got a Zach Moser alec 98 out of 299 Buffalo Carlos with the bills and a trade Lance Victor Christian McCaffrey To 60 to 50 That's 50 out of 50 TJ Right. Yeah, could be got a couple eBay one of ones there. It's Josh Jacobs. There's She Smith to 199 All right, we were talking about how unlucky the Jets on the field have been Adam was hoping for at least some luck for the Jets in this set and he found it and guess what? There's still four boxes to go. We're only halfway through this half-case break Good luck, everyone Yeah, we're starting to see a little more Carolina in here to TJ Maybe we'll find some relics some hits some autos Adam's on the fence about whether to list all of your James Morgan's Think he could be an effective backup. Oh, yeah, some Chuba Hubbard Try to find that guy. All right We got Tom Brady right up on top and we got a Nico Collins new generation relic to 299 Jerry with Houston Jalen Hurts We got Robbie Anderson to 149 Aziz Ojalari to 249 for the New York football Giants We got Amanra St. Brown new generation relic 119 out of 249 Patrick with Detroit And we got Micah Parsons rookie auto 17 out of 50 for the boys David with Dallas Darius Tony to 299 Giants to 75 Cortland Sutton Stars insert Devonte Adams to 149 And we got a Travis at poor Travis Etienne junior 89 out of 249 our first Poor this guy of the year goes to Travis Etienne Jaguars Jared with the Jags That's a keeper hold on to him I'm sure he'll make his return Better than ever next year. Is Micah Parsons a hard knocks favorite. I actually have not watched that How many episodes of hard knocks have there been now? I had to catch up on maybe this weekend. I'll catch up on some hard knocks or CD Lambs to 299 Look at this all over. I know you have the You have the chargers in this how about an 8 out of 75 street art Justin Herbert The 2021 insert, I don't know what a second-year Justin Herbert will go for on a secondary market, but That insert looks pretty cool. Oh, we're about three episodes in. Okay. That's easy to catch up Next ball. All right, California. Let's put some runs on the board. Do I still have that? I think I thought I should have kept that I had drawn a picture of Travis Etienne's Liz Frank injury If you're wondering what that's all about if you watch the video and pick your team one I drew a nice little sketch of it Pretty much a medical expert. There's Derek Carr leading us off four out of five Aaron Rodgers stars insert Brian Kay with Green Bay out of fives and under get the train whistle all aboard the big hit express Got Miles Gaskin to 199 and AJ Dylan a piece of the game The Packers font underneath the rally to 249 AJ Dylan It's another one for Brian and the Packers Go Pat go That's right. Joe Jaspy MD Will break it down for you one out of 75 Justin Jefferson and seal of approval to 249 dangerous and for the New York football Giants Cadarius Tony to color patch and autograph 35 out of 99 for the G Steven Davidson with the Giants We'll have to have a disclaimer at the end of each video or Joe is actually not a Certified MD. This is not medical advice Please consult your medical professional before Nineteen out of 249 Marques Colston Certified gamers dual relic for the Saints. That's for David Duffy Michael Carter to 99 Seven out of ten Brian Edwards mirror signatures. See what I mean you guys play to the whistle That is Jonathan with my Raiders Was very worried way too early in the break gets the out of ten Brian Edwards a lot of injury issues for him last year But he's healthy coming into camp Could have a really big season this year. There's a Tommy tremble to 299. That's a catch Look at that. His eyes are locked in his hands are out in front All right, good diamond shape Going to TJ and the Panthers. We got to find some some ink for TJ. Jabril Cox 399 All right two boxes to go Right not a doctor, but I do play one on TV. I should invest in Invest in a in a maybe a lab coat White lab coat maybe Darren, maybe I should just have a stethoscope hanging around my neck Maybe come up with some doctor related catchphrase instead of the big hit express Be safe No, you come on you say come on up rigged Lamar Jackson to 249 Eric Stokes to 10 And we've got a Ron Dale Moore new generation relic 122 out of 249 for the Cardinals Alex No, white lab coats spike your blood pressure So no for Darren That's a no vote On the Joe Jasky rebranding. I'm gonna workshop the idea. There's Patrick Sartain to 149 Alvin Alvin Camara to 199 and another jet Elijah Moore to color patch and autograph to 17 out of 299 feel like the Jets I Feel like the jets have a pretty interesting Pretty interesting weapons For Zach Wilson Excuse me, right Corey Davis is who they got so Elijah Moore Denzel Mims a couple youngsters on that team You mix in a guy like Corey Davis they even got I think James and Crowders on that team too So there's some there's some weapons and then you got keep defense is honest With running backs like the Michael P. Ryan Michael Carter Tevin Coleman You know, are there some some something maybe a Tyler Croft It's some some tight ends there that can that can help out in the passing game Be interesting Here's a Justin Fields street art insert Jason wainer in the Bears. Oh Oh Elijah Moore hasn't played yet Adam saying he hasn't played in the first two preseason games He can get healthy hashtag good for the hobby Although I think we got spoiled with this guy Justin Jefferson with the year that he had There's Devonte Parker dual relic 52 out of 199 for Darren and the Dolphins I think we got spoiled with Justin Jefferson because usually it takes a year or two I Feel like right a couple seasons or so for for wide receivers to really To really get used to the league and really emerge as a serious threat We got Albert okawa Bonham 36 out of 50 mirror signatures For Patrick and Denver Tyler Locke. We've got Tyler Vaughn's to 199 Miles Sanders to 299 Christian McCaffrey seal of approval To to Atwell for the Rams to to 399 Josh Allen stars insert and the final box coming up This is a pick your team to pick your team three is from a fresh case pick your team three half case from a fresh case Pick your team three has 12 teams left and that random team break four box The random team breaks four boxes one spot gets you two teams. That's down to seven Seven of 16 spots left. All right. Yeah This is this is now the moment of truth with the last box. This is where we can start thinking. Come on Where's my team? This is the whistle right here. Good luck everybody Just ran out of trash can space excellent. All right. Good luck everybody. Thank you for getting in This is a brand new release just dropped today. So keep getting into it on Jaspies case breaks calm There's Michael Carter 36 out of 50 For Adam and the Jets and there's Davis Mills to 299 and a Trevor Lawrence Street art insert. I think they just on the checklist. They just called the 2021 insert But I like the street art look on the back of it officially named the week one starter Earlier today That'll be Jared and the Jags Stars insert George Kittle to 199 for the Niners We've got an orange Matthew Stafford to 149 for the ranch still doesn't look right in the Rams colors looks a little weird That'll be for Steven Davidson the Kittle will be for Victor and the Niners Devin Singletary and a Kyle Pitts to color three color pack a little bit of red peeking down there That's 48 out of 99 Brody With the Kyle Pitts Better than zero Hollywood. A lot of people are walking away with zero hits and There's trade Lance rookie roll call autograph 15 out of 15 Victor Zamora and the San Francisco Niners Nice one for the 49ers Looks good in some of those pre-season like last pre-season game. I watched look pretty good There's Tray McKinney to 249 all over with the Chargers Antonio Gibson to 299 Patrick in the Washington football team Aaron Rogers stars insert to 249 For Green Bay, it's gonna go to Brian and Jacob Harris for the Rams Jersey and autograph 460 out of 499 That's receiving Davidson and the Rams Some nice texture right there The last hit is gonna be Dak Prescott 108 out of 299 that relic going to David Duffy and the Dallas Cowboys And there you go ladies gentlemen stars Christian McCaffrey to Sean Watson CD lamb a nice finish to this second half Let's do a quick little Recap. Thanks everybody on a nice inserts good autographs We've got these stars out of five Aaron Rodgers. Maybe maybe build that rainbow. We got the out of five in another parallel This is a super short print that Alvin Camara The certified ground. There's also certified air Short print We have not seen the the stats short print There you go. They've done of course. There was the Tray Lance and the Zach Wilson couple nice autographs there Thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with us ladies and gentlemen brand new release more in the store And we can post more once some of those pick your teams start to sell out I'm Joe for jazzy's case breaks calm. I'll see you next time for the next one. Thank you


I think we are going to start soon, but before the main event, I want to go over a couple of administrative items in the Hyperledger Identity Working Group. The first thing is we are bound by the antitrust policy of Linux Foundation and hence anybody who is joining this call is expected to abide by that as well. The details can be found in the agenda. The second thing is we have a Code of Conduct which says that we treat each other with respect even when we are disagreeing with each other or even when we are agreeing with each other. It doesn't matter. Please respect the other participants and treat them as you would be treated yourself. Before we start, it looks like there are still people coming into the room. There are already 14 participants, so I would rather wait just one more minute. I see some familiar faces, some who are not familiar. In any case, I'm going to drop the agenda link in the chat so that people can put in their names on the meeting notes as having attended. That's important because we want to keep track of people here. Of course, if you don't want to be on the list, please let me know anyway. I wanted to take this opportunity to welcome Rebecca or Ribi, Aspla, I think I'm saying it right, I hope, and she is here as a project director of project management from Unbound, Unbound is well known for being the pioneer in MPC because Yehuda Lindel, who I occasioned to listen to, did present in several contexts the greatness of MPC for custody and transfer of assets, especially in an enterprise setting. I believe it can be useful also in other settings because it allows some amount of delegation, and so Ribi is going to talk about many of these aspects. You got the email, so let's welcome Ribi to do the presentation and hopefully she will share her slides and we'll get to record it and make it available. Thank you. Thank you, Ribi, so much for the kind introduction. My name is Rebecca, the abbreviation is Ribi, so as you feel comfortable and uncomfortable with both, thank you everyone for taking the time to join Good Morning or Good Evening wherever you are. I hope you will find value in this presentation, we will of course share it afterwards in an offline manner. I'm sure Ribi will help me understand how I can share it with you guys, and assuming that you do see the slides, I will begin if that's okay. Can you see the slides? Yes. Okay, so I'm moving on. Thank you. We'll be moving on to a presentation mode, and I do apologize, I'm working from home as most of us I think are these days, so there will be background noises. I do have a dog that is often barking, so apologies for that in advance. So we'll focus today on IoT ecosystems, specifically blockchain type of IoT because there are different IoT ecosystems, and we'll talk about the challenges that this specific ecosystem is working with or is challenged by, and how MPC could solve these challenges as opposed to say I would say different methods. But firstly, very briefly, I just two slides of things about Unbound Tech, very privileged to be working for these guys, these are Professor Yuda Linda and Professor Nigel Smart. They have been the co-founders of the company, both of them are academia people. They have been working about or of multi-party computation for the last 30 years. So that's quite a long time to work on something, and have been able to get through a performance type of breakthrough about six years ago, being able to shorten the performance time of multi-party computation from minutes time to many seconds time, therefore opening the door to applicability, let me say usage of MPC. Their initial idea, by the way, was to secure airplanes with MPC, but we found together for the last six years that the use cases are various, numerous, starting from, you know, even creating the HSM, which is more secure than hardware HSM, going through code signing, protecting digital assets, and today we'll focus specifically on the use case of blocking specifically IoT kind of ecosystem. Unbound, this is its brief history. I wouldn't dive into this today just to let you know that we've been around for about six years now, growing day after day, very proud of the type of customers that have trusted their assets with us, whether these are data assets or financial assets. We have customers such as SteadyBank, Goldman Sachs, IBM, McAfee. These are just a few of the names that I can mention, liquid in the blockchain area. There are many more names that cannot be disclosed, but we're very proud of our enterprise-grade type of customers. One can only imagine that these types of customers run through very vigorously, I would say, pen testing and security checkups before they sign with any type of company. So, although the product is rather new, it has been out there less than 10 years, the technology is very much trusted by those enterprise-grade customers. Moving on, so now we dive into the stuff. No more, I would say, marketing of the company itself. So behind the scenes, MPC, and this will be the foundation of our talk today, and we'll see in a minute why. So behind the scenes, MPC is pretty much taking a key, pretty much. It's not that simple, but it's pretty much taking a key and generating it from scratch in a distributed manner. So the key does not exist as one entity all over its life, like a full generation, to usage, to suspension, to revocation. And the number of shares could be unlimited. In this very simple example, we could see five key shares. You could see that the key shares could be on any type of device, could be a mobile device, could be a laptop, could be a server. We're a platform agnostic, we're a device agnostic. And therefore, the possibilities you can start imagining what you can do with such, I would say, an ecosystem of multiple key shares that could be leveraging their power together to sign one transaction. This transaction could be signing data transaction, financial transaction. It doesn't matter. The whole thing is that the key does not exist as one entity. This is evolution-wise representing, I would say, the next step as to if one would know with blockchain specifically for the context of this call, starting with one key that was once kept or still is kept in HSMs, moving on to multi-seq, which are multi-pod keys shared with different parties, but with their full manner keys, full entity keys, on to MPC, meaning key shares. And it is not me saying so, but actually Gardner is saying so. That MPC is going to be the main, I would say, best practice type of security means in the next five years for blockchain applications. So this is really interesting, not my word, but actually Gardner's word. Now diving into IoT and specifically blockchain IoT. So this is where we'll start diving more into the details. So the starting point, of course, is the fact that we're surrounded by these wearable and devices that are sending data and receiving data all over the place. There's a projection of 10 billion more devices coming online in the next four years, and lots of data flowing around all over the place. Now this is very different from the situation there was 10 years ago, and certainly from the situation that will be 10 years ahead. This is interesting because many of the devices that are out there already are brownfield in the sense that they operate with very minimal power or processing power and still one has to secure them or rely on them once trying to operate. Now, obviously attackers will exploit and are exploiting these, I would say, vulnerabilities. And here are just a few examples of what you can do in order to attack an IoT device. This is not the focus of our talk to data vulnerabilities themselves, but the way to protect them. But you can see here different types. And I think this is the important thing maybe to emphasize various types of security vulnerabilities that an organization or a blockchain infrastructure of IoT ecosystem must take into account when designing such an infrastructure. Now the type of protection that you need could be defined using these four types. If you could look at it, so you have the need to secure the devices themselves, the hardware, you need to secure the communication between the devices. Remembering these devices and data from one to another, specifically in the blockchain news case where the data should flow between each peer to another peer. There's of course the secure cloud where data goes on to and from to and from the cloud to the devices off. And of course the lifecycle management of the data itself. Now the little key icons were not actually on the original image that I have found. You can see the IoT analytics source credit is to them. But interestingly, many of these security I would say protection requirements do require secure key to be able to work them in a secure manner or move them around, move data, secure data. Whether it's data at rest, whether it's data transit, whether these are authentication of the devices themselves, the identity of them, or whether these are authorizations of messages moving around from one device to another device, to a cloud, to servers, wherever it is. Now how these keys are being protected today. This is becoming more interesting because today, most of the IoT devices don't have secure elements. You can actually distinguish between weak IoT devices and secure IoT devices. Interestingly, I don't know if you recall a few years ago, there was a very interesting impact on one of the largest hotels in Las Vegas. I don't remember its specific name. And the data of the various gamblers, etc. was stolen, a lot of data, one can imagine. And interestingly, the way that they got to the IT, to the servers on which data was, was through the term mayors of the, where do you keep the fish? I don't remember just how the words, like those big fish tankers in those large Las Vegas casinos. So those terminators are weak IoT devices for that matter. And the hackers were able to reach the cloud servers, the data, the IT and the data of the various gamblers and the casino data through the terminators of these fish tankers. So we can see that there are weak IoT devices and these are actually the majority of them. And there are of course the secure IoT devices, but the ecosystem is the one that we should care about because wherever you go into a home, a city, you have to deal with both types. Now the weak ones don't have secure elements. They're actually working on very low batteries or very modest processing power. And their battery is expected to last at least two years. So you don't have to replace those. One can imagine how difficult it would be to replace batteries all over cameras for that example. So one would have to create a cryptographic type of security that is powerful enough, but then again, not heavily consuming processing power. Now, this is very interesting as the fact is that currently obfuscations or techniques are considered relatively weak, so one cannot use those. But the strong algorithms are actually the ones today usually need more processing power, which is not the cases one can see. As mentioned before, many of these also have brownfield kind of equipment out there, meaning they don't even have any thing to work with cryptographic testing. And one would need to sign transactions, sign messages, decrypt data, encrypt data. So the challenge become, I would say, becomes more apparent. Now IoT blockchain use cases, quite new for the last five years and becoming more and more apparent in the market. I didn't put here any market slides as far as what the market is adopting. But interestingly, Gardner has found that there's an 80% growth to CAGR year over year of the IoT adoption rate. This is very interesting. It's very similar to the ones that we see in the digital assets area. One can imagine the fact that cars are being very much driving this industry even though a lot in the lab, but still cars and all the equipment's around that. So here you can see that there are two types of ecosystems. One is the centralized IoT system. And one can say this is not really an ecosystem of blockchain because it is centralized, but we'll see in a minute that it is in those private blockchains. The one that we tend to consider a real blockchain is the fully distributed one, meaning peer-to-peer, no central server. But what we see is the fact that you have these various types of blockchains. So of course, there's the centralized one, which is not a blockchain. This is a centralized database somewhere where we all know these are the typical organizations that we all work with. There's the decentralized and of course the distributed one. Today we're going to focus mostly on this one because this is what we see with the enterprise-grade of customers. Meaning they do need blockchains because they are creating ecosystems where they do work with customers with suppliers, with service providers, with partners and consumers. And therefore they need to be able to move data and approve transaction and authenticated devices between various types of them and certainly a lot of them. But it's not a fully peer-to-peer kind of ecosystem, but there is a central server somewhere, wherever it is. And still there's for several cloud servers that do create like a magnificent, mighty database blockchain enabled. So the data is shared in an anonymous manner between the various types of mini ecosystem. So let's see a few examples. So a smart home example, of course, all of us will have a smart home in a biome environment where we have inside many IoT devices. So it could be even the shades, the lights, of course. We talked about thermometers, air conditioner, et cetera, garage doors. So there's the ecosystem within the house of various types of IoT devices that have to communicate with each other. There should be, of course, an in-home server. One can imagine that these are different manufacturers, of course. And still the data must flow securely between the various types, regardless of the manufacturing, I would say, party. But you can also start imagining the different layers of ecosystem. So it could be in-house, in-building, in-compact. You can imagine like a Bosch, for example, as a manufacturer requiring data from all the longer machines in a certain location, in a certain complex, in a certain country. You can think of consumers exchanging data between them to get recommendation on specific long-term machine, et cetera. So the security challenges would involve provisioning authentication, protecting data address, data transit, and of course, transaction of data, proving data between various types of IoT devices. Or even turning on, turning off different devices, et cetera. Examples of what could go wrong, in this case, would be several opening doors. Safety-wise, one can imagine what could happen if it is at home and someone is able to privacy. You do not want to share the data with someone you have not approved sharing the data with.  Let's say you come home and everything has been turned on. It may not be scary for the first time, but maybe for the third time it is. And certainly, a waste of energy. Any questions so far? Moving on. Another example, this is a smart city. This is a more complex example as far as what could go wrong. I think some of the examples within are probably outdated. They have their own use cases. Still the connectivity, parking, autonomous vehicles, pollution. There has been, even just a few months ago, I'm Israel, by the way, and there has been an attack, which no one really knows where it came from. One can only guess on the water supply of Israel. So someone messed up with the water supply coming in to most of the Israeli homes from, I would say, one lake or one source of water. And the amount of fluoride that was injected into the water had been, had the attack had been successful, would have been dangerous to consume. Simple drinking water. So this is not anymore like just saving energy, but could really be quite dangerous if one could know where to mess up with the data. You can think of train going out of function or going much faster than they should. So many, I would say, dangers that could be inflicted on various IoT devices. The ecosystem here is, again, very interesting, blockchain-wise. You can think of the various types of IoT devices. You can think of the areas that would collaborate on data. You can think of manufacturers all around the world trying to get data, let's say, from a specific type of truck, doing something, so many things to analyze, a whole different kind of use case, but analytics of this. But this is really interesting and starting to get momentum. And this is something that Unbound has been fortunate enough to take part in, without these goods and too much data. But this is a public slide of Toyota, which has its own blockchain lab and is building something really cool in the sense that they're building an ecosystem of manufacturers, service suppliers, dealers, retailers and consumers to be able to consume, share data and work in a blockchain environment with various parts of Toyota cars and Toyota services, even the entertainment system within Toyota cars. So they're building a really cool blockchain type of environment. And again, they have to address security challenges, such as the ones that are written here. I would say that the automotive car is a much more complex one compared to the smart home one. Whenever it comes to regulation, each car has several I would say ECUs, they call them mini servers within that have to be protected. And it takes about 10 years to be able to get something into each of these ECU units. So it is happening. It is moving slowly partly because of regulation. And I think we should all say thank you for them to move slowly in such a cautious manner because none of us would like to draw a card that has been taken over by, I would say, Hacker. So the current status quo as far as IoT blockchain security is, these are the various types. I was very much surprised to know that these are still the ones that are protecting most of the IoT devices. It is not surprising from where we started the conversation in the sense that many of them don't have secure elements or have very poor processing power. But it is interesting that many of these authentication tools and security tools are pretty much evolutionary wise, the ones that were popular 20 years ago. And not much advancement has been done since then. So what are the challenges with current authentication tools? Many of them, one can imagine, are platform dependent. Even though there are many more types of IoT devices compared to, let's say 20 years ago, they're manufactured by a huge array of vendors. Hi TCO, we had one customer with which we wanted to work two years ago. And interestingly, that customer said, you know, for me to be able to put it doesn't matter which key, whether it's MPC key share or a full key. On my old IoT devices, their spread all around that would cost me two million dollars because I have to get dedicated teams moving now all around the country to be able to implement those, whatever it is, on those very old IoT devices. So they were very much sorry to say they would not be implementing not MPC, but nothing else into taking, I would say, the risk that something would happen and managing that risk because they cannot afford to put any type of security means out there. So in their case, without disclosing their names, their name, they're simply managing the risk of something happening. And we all do that on a daily basis. You know, we're not protecting everything with the best, I would say, security means, but we manage the risk for that. Resources, constrained devices, we've just talked about these types. Many of them, actually most of them out there, whether these are weak devices or old devices. And of course, we just talked about the fact that they're not secure authentication rules. They're very much outdated, have been around for at least 20 years where most of the hackers are not even 20 years old for that matter. Any questions before we move on to MPC? OK. So going back to this specific slide, so if this is how MPC would work as far as creating a key in a split manner, sharing it between the various signers and using it in its distributed manner, now one can imagine the various use cases. So this is the smart home example, just in one case. We've talked about the smart home example and what could go wrong. But now can you imagine a situation where each of these devices has a key share? And the key share is the very, I would say, lean and mean type of data, a very small file, just keel byte size in the sense of sizing. And it could be put on whatever IoT device that you want to work with as long as it has even a mini server with some processing power. So you can now start imagining what you can do. It is important maybe to emphasize that the minimum authentication that would be required would require at least two key shares. So you would have one key share on the client side for that matter. The endpoint is an example, the door lock and one key share on the server side. Now, these could be more key shares, let's say five. But honestly, one would not, you know, if I want to open my home door, I wouldn't want now my, I don't know, life partner or kid to jointly sign such a transaction with me. I just want to open the door, right? So I would authenticate using probably multi-factor or at least two-factor authentication, let's say my fingerprint using a mobile device and using another key share that would be on the server side that would be able to open up the door. Same one can imagine, for example, turning on an air conditioner, etc. You know, the examples are very various. Now, the authentication could be done using two clients for that matter. One could be on the mobile device and one could be on a mobile device such as a phone. So the examples are various as far as what you can do with it. But the principle is pretty much the same. At least one key share on an endpoint, at least one key share on the server side. And as long as you have at least a pair of key shares, you can create this secure boundary as far as we can. Any questions? Open the door now. This is Jonathan. I'm just curious. So are you using SEC-P256K1 in Snore signatures? So are these separate private keys that you're doing like M of N? Or are these, like, how are you combining these split into shares into either a signal signature or validating the multi-signature in M of N? So thank you very much for this question. So it is in the direction, in the sense that there is an encrypted signature behind the scene. The various key shares actually decrypt the encrypted signature. So as soon as you reach an M of N decrypted or key material, you can able to release the encrypted or decrypt the encrypted signature. So it's not multi-signature in the sense though of full keys, but actually M of N exactly as you mentioned, where the M of N have to decrypt the encrypted signature. Okay. So there is a private key on the IoT device in order to un-encrypt the need of M of N from disperse other keys in order to, for that key on that device in order to afford the function. There is no full, there is no full private key. There is only a key share. The key share would be wrapped by an authentication key, which would be a full key, but this is just a full key to wrap the key share. But there is no full key as far as the decryption of the encrypted signature in order to, let's say, approve a transaction or sign a message. No full key. However, the phase of the communication is, whether it's a message, whether it's a transaction, there is no full key ever. Okay. So it's snore signatures? These could be snore signatures, yes. This could be EDDSA, ECDSA, snore. We're pretty much agnostic as to the type of signature that has to be created with crypto agile. This is one of the advantages, I think, of having it on a software meaning, you know, snore is new. I don't think it was two years ago. I'm not sure, but we support it now. So we don't know what will be out there in two years from now. Okay. Thanks. This is more challenging, I would say, for the IoT environment regardless of when down. The fact that this market is moving so fast, you know, you cannot replace IoT devices every two years out there. Okay. Tesla example, this is a real example, the vulnerability one, not the protection one. So two years ago, there was a relay attack where someone was able to steal a Tesla car model S. I'm pretty sure they've changed it from now. So I do apologize for the fact that I'm giving Tesla as an example still today, but it is a nice anecdote for that matter. And at least two years ago, they authenticated the transaction of opening a car using a key that was fully kept on the phone app. It was actually stored in the app's sandbox folder and therefore vulnerable to malware. I'm pretty sure they have changed it since then, but this was the situation then. I think this is another testimonial of why, when this is very, I would say, expensive type of asset and the car is of course such type of asset, one would not want to rely on a full key on the app of the end user. This is the case, by the way, with the self managed or self sovereign keys wherever identity is being discussed. Let's say with Hyperledger Indy just as an example. So this is very useful when you're speaking of, let's say exposing one's age when you're trying to get into a restaurant or a bar, but I wouldn't want to be able to open a car using a key that would be stored on my device in its full state, in its full entity state. But this was the case with the Tesla Model 5 or Model S case a few years ago. This is, I'll show you now an example of how this situation could have been addressed using MPC. Keys could have been split between the car owner and the server on the Tesla car. We just talked about a few minutes ago, the fact that each car today regardless of one bound has many ECUs within. So one could leverage one of those ECUs to be able to open up the car where one key share would be on one of those ECUs servers within the car and one would be on the mobile device of an end user and making sure that nothing can happen. Let's say if even the device was stolen or has been blown just as an example, one would have to use multi-factor authentication, let's say a fingerprint just as an example, but could be more than that even an OTP, et cetera to be able to reach a car or to open a car, sorry. So one can imagine just even convenience-wise regardless of the security thing, just reaching the car with my mobile phone and being able to open the car without moving around with a hardware token for that matter, which is the old-fashioned key that we still all use in one way or another. So this is a great example of how MPC could be leveraged to do that. Home door example, we talked about that. So the key could be split and shared between a mobile app and server side could be on the phone itself and the home lock door could have mini server on it. So this is already happening in few hotels worldwide. So this is very interesting as far as moving around but one can imagine an entire ecosystem blockchain-wise as far as creating, let's say complexes of vacations, hopefully we'll all start, sorry, there she goes, to open doors in complexes of vacation houses, et cetera. And going back to the Toyota example, this is becoming more interesting because now we don't talk anymore about one, it's a key that is not even there but it's still being shared between two parties as we've seen here. So you always have this pair with the Toyota case. We're actually starting to make use of the fact that the key could be distributed between N parties and you need M of N to be able to sign a transaction. So one can imagine at Toyota, let's say consumer, a buyer going into one of their dealer houses, wanting to buy whatever it is they want to the car and you have the supplier, you have a customer and a dealer on the other side, you want Toyota to be aware of this information without disclosing the, let's say, even the private details of the consumers themselves and one can imagine the various advantages of such a blockchain type of scenario, you can manage better the supply chain, you can manage the amount of equipment that you have moving around the world in different ports and different manufacturing houses, so much more efficiency, so much on demand, I would say, supply to the specific point of supply to the end consumers. We have such an example with Walmart even though it's not an IoT use case but I think it's a very interesting one because Walmart now buys vegetable and all types of fresh produce from their local retailers just on the type of supply requirements or demand requirements, I would say, so they don't need to keep tons of tomatoes just as an example in warehouses, getting them less fresh day after day because they can get messages from the local supermarkets using blockchain to be able to address demand in a much more faster manner than before. So with Toyota cars and equipment, this is not, I would say, as sensitive as keeping tomatoes as fresh as possible but one can imagine that the Toyota-related supplies or IoT devices are much more expensive and therefore they do want to make it much more efficient. So this is another example. Any questions before we dive into the threat model or maybe we should stop here for discussion? Yeah, Jim, may I ask one quick question? One of the challenges I've worked on Moby Standards which is for the Mobility Open Blockchain Initiative on vehicles which includes Tesla, Toyota, and all the other stuff and in there we were looking at security and keys with the challenges of trying to talk about, everybody talks about hardware wallets and so on on the vehicles. The bigger challenge for me has always been I'll go with the practical real-world ability to recover keys and access when they're corrupted, destroyed, stolen, whatever, compromised. And I don't see anybody really addressing that well and having experienced, you know, to your point about autonomous vehicles, one of the good reasons they're going slow is that many of the scenarios that do exist in the real world are not yet addressed in AB driving scenarios for sure. The same problem applies to, in a sense, any identity access solution for sure and I assume there's no difference with multi-party computation key management as well. You still say, okay, if you have, in a sense, this multi-party key like you showed in the example for the car you say, okay, your phone is now destroyed or the ECU on the car has been destroyed, which is very easy to happen. You know, can you still, in a sense, access the vehicle? And the answer is probably not. And what's the time to recovery? So if you think about recovery models, we talked about RTO and RPO, recovery point recovery time objectives. And I don't see any of that kind of stuff specified or, in a sense, these types of solutions, which maybe in many cases is not critical, but in certain ones like vehicle access and so on, it would be critical for sure. Yes, thank you very much for this question because very fortunate Unbound MPC is addressing those issues with the fact that these key shares are being refreshed constantly and one can suspend or even revoke a key share to be able to generate and enroll another key share, let's say, to another party. So just as an example, if one, actually it is shown in this threat model that I'll show you in a minute. Let's say someone loses their phone or their phone is being stolen. So you can suspend or revoke that key share. You can enroll another key share. Let's say if you bought a new phone and you want. So yes, so it is addressed. But if it would be helpful, if you took like exactly the car access scenario and said, okay, walk it through a recovery model, which says, okay, the phone is to your point stolen. So I don't have a phone. What is the recovery time objective that we achieve that we're going for, I should say, in that scenario? Is it minutes, hours, days? What is the actual recovery time that you're talking about? So let me address the general scenario. General scenario, it's a matter of seconds. We've done so. Even yesterday we had someone in another, I would say customer, not a car. I would say we're not working yet with cars. As I've mentioned, the automotive car is moving so. And I think we should all be thankful for that. But another customer, even yesterday, a real life example, someone bought a new phone, wanted to upgrade the app that we're using with them, something went wrong. And it was just a matter of seconds before we simply revoked the old phone and enrolled the new phone with the new key share. As simple as that. So this is a very, I would say, easy example with that specific case. This was a digital asset type of management system. So the time frame is very critical. You cannot have any compromised key share whenever you're trading or safeguarding a million dollars, like even much more expensive, you know, than a Tesla car for that matter. I think that the more concerns when speaking of automotive are actually not so much, you know, stealing the mobile phone, but taking over a car, something like that. So I don't know how far the industry is there as far as taking over an ECU, et cetera. Yeah. If we could dive into the threat model, I think you'll find some examples you may find valuing. So these are just a few. I'm not covering all those, you know, I showed you in one of the earlier slides, about 30 types of attacks. So these are the main ones as far as just, you know, for our discussion today. So it could be mobile traffic, the redirection and network adversary, of course, very relevant where you're talking about, let's say traffic jams, traffic lights being messed around denial of service, of course, side channel attacks and device cloning, which would be the case. Let's say with someone taking over someone's mobile phone in order to open a car if we address this specific example using this specific threat. So when focusing on the network adversary or traffic redirection using MPCN, and here I do have to go back in the sense of do taking, I would say, pride in the fact that I'm part of unbound. This is not generic MPC protocols that we're talking about, but actually unbound solution for these types of challenges. So with unbound solution, all messages are encrypted. There's a unique counter to prevent replay attacks. An attacker cannot learn anything about the message from the mobile phone. If you remember these are key shares, these are simply data file messages, nothing really that can be... This is not cryptographic information in the sense that one can steal it and you use it in order to do something. They have to break into all mobile devices and all servers. If you remember that Toyota examples with at least five key shares. So one would have to break into all five devices and additional servers at the same second because everything is being encrypted and all the key shares are being refreshed after each operation and after intervals of time. So even in the unlikely event of a device being compromised, nothing can be learned about other devices at the same time. This is to emphasize that the shares are random between the various parties. It is not just as an example. If the entire key is 100, this is an example. And these are five copies. It's not that every party gets 20, 20, 20. The shares are random. They're being split in a random manner. And after each refresh, every party gets a different random share. So this is to address this type of a diversity attack. Device cloning, which would be, I would say, more relevant for the car example. So when humans authenticate, it will require multi-factor authentication with devices that have secure elements such as iOS. We are using the iOS secure element to be able to store the key share itself and the authentication key, of course, that traps that key share. The key shares are being refreshed continuously. And if a clone device did carry out an authentication action before the legitimate device, the MPC solution protocols will detect the clone attack and raise a flag. I would like to emphasize here, which is not written down, that unbound can very easily, and we don't have time today to show you an actual demo, can suspend and revoke a device in a matter of seconds once we order the customer for traces and issue and be able to re-enroll another device or the same device if it has been just suspended in a matter of seconds as well. Backup-wise, this is something that is not mentioned here, but worth mentioning in light of the former discussion. Thank you again for the question. Backup is also MPC-enabled, meaning the backup is being done using key shares or two full keys, by the way, RSA keys that could be or should be used together in order to recover assets for that matter, or data assets. And this is also a unique capability of unbound, the fact that it's MPC-based, publicly verifiable, and could be used by the organization itself or even a third party. Whether these are, you know, just as an example with the Toyota example, they could use a third-party consulting company to escape in G or Accenture to be able to backup the information as a trusted escrow service. Side-channel attacks, as we all know them, take advantage of the fact that the same keys being used on the same machine, same processing chips and information such as timing, power consumption, electromagnetic even leaks or even some could be used to create side-channel attacks. So with the case of unbound MPC, the fact that these are random shares on the server side and the endpoint side mean that there is no full key to be able to steal or to attack. And again, that sharing refresh takes place every operation, every interval of time. And I think that the last attack that we may want to talk about today is denial of service. So usually the denial of service rely on the fact that there is some kind of a proof of work that the IoT device has to do upon enrollment. But with MPC, as we've mentioned, this is the breakthrough. It is done so fast as opposed to, let's say, any type of other operation or suddenly MPC, let's say, 10 years ago. So the verification would be so much faster than the proof of work that would be required in order to create the denial of service. This is unrelated to the fact that usually you'd create high availability type of environment, server side, using different clouds at the same time, creating some sort of redundancy between servers, etc. Automative industry, a whole different kind of story. You cannot create ECUs or multiple ECUs for each function in the car. So much more complicated, a real challenge. And I am actually very much envious and admiring all the automated people that are working diligently today on these scenarios. So this is just to summarize MPC. I think you've got the hang of it as far as what's behind it, what it can do, the use cases it could be used for. And that's it as far as I am concerned. Thank you so much for your time. I have a couple of questions. I think we have a couple of questions. Yes, thank you. I have a couple of questions. Obviously you're talking about some kind of a ratchet protocol or something that refreshes the keys. So that would assume connectivity, right? I mean, without connectivity, that refresh cannot happen. Exactly, yes, you are absolutely right. Online connection is required for the refresh, yes. So coming back to the question of, let us say, use of IoT and blockchain, one of the more interesting ones is where you track the provenance or even the progress of material and also the temperature or the pressure. Like for example, you can have an IoT device inside a container that brings some sensitive material, but often this is at sea and it is very difficult to maintain connectivity throughout. So obviously there has to be some kind of protocol to secure those IoT devices and to be sure that whatever they're sending back is good data that they cannot be sabotaged. Yes, absolutely. You are absolutely right. When these are offline servers or endpoints, the refresh becomes a challenge. I would say that it's much better than having no, I would say empty sea around because I would say the worst case is actually having a full key that is not being refreshed ever. So it is an advancement, but yes, connectivity would be preferred in order to allow for that refresh to happen. I would like to address a workaround around that that we are doing with various types of customers of us. Whenever one of the devices would be offline, we do recommend having a policy, we call it, of at least a few devices that would have to take part in a transaction, some sort of a transaction. We are leveraging trusted systems where some of them are fully cold, therefore not refreshing key shares and some are hot, and both sides, both systems are required in order to sign a transaction, let's say the cold one and the hot one. This is a much more, I would say, sophisticated use case. I don't see it really happening for IoT devices unless these are very, very, I would say dangerous ones. Let's say trains just as an example, but it is possible if one would really want to do so. And what exactly is your product? Do you sell the libraries or do you sell the full solution? The full solution. Okay, because I had heard that you also allow people to build something on top of the libraries you provide. Yes, actually, in the sense of, we do have an MPC library, two-party MPC library open-sourced. It's in Git. It can be found very easily. We've spread it around actually as a means to educate, I would say, even the market when we started out five or six years ago, people were not very much aware of what MPC is or what it can do. So we simply released the two-party MPC out there. So these are libraries that anyone can leverage. We support whoever wants to use them. I wouldn't call it a solution. These are simply very low-level type of MPC two-party. But you also have another library that is multi-party, that is licensible, right? Yes, yes. But not, I mean, I'm not talking about a full solution. Just that and then you build on top of it to, I mean, I think it would be useful to talk very little bit on the difference between, let us say, multi-sig, which many people implement and MPC, because that is a striking difference. Yes, I don't know if, sorry, if we have the time, I do have a great slide specifically for that. If we can just spare two more minutes, I'll find that slide, open it up. And I could show you in just one slide, the difference between multi-sig and MPC. Let me just find it.  You can show it, you know, we can extend by one or two minutes. Yes. Of course, we will remind you that we are also going to have the presentation of this in, of something similar in the capital markets thing because we are talking about high value, you know, transactions. Go ahead. Yes. So this is just one slide and I'll finish with that. So thank you for the question. MPC, we consider it next gen multi-sig because everyone knows full key type of old fashioned kind of security means. This is what HSMs do very strong for protecting keys. Challenges that would block chain just safeguarding the key itself is not good enough because one doesn't have to steal the key. They simply have to see the key in order to steal the assets. So this is pretty much why multi-sig has evolved. So there are multi-pile keys that each and every endpoint or signer is holding. Actually being required to sign it and being accountable for that on chain. The cost of that is the fact that it does not support all ledgers. We just talked about Schnorr. I don't think I'm not sure if Schnorr is supporting multi-sig. We do know that there are many ledgers that do not support multi-sig. For example, the point of stake type of assets, you have very limited quorum structures that you can create up to two out of three. And if you want to create more than two of three, you have to code very sophisticated scripts into that. And there you go into application security type of rules and spark contracts, which are very vulnerable on their own. It's hard to change approvers. You have to decode them out code additional signers in unlike the unbound solution where you simply suspend or revoke and enroll a new type of signer. And of course, if you're dealing with heavily operation cost-oriented type of organizations, the fact that you have more and more signers on the same transaction, meaning you're paying higher fees. With multi-party computation, none of this happens. Specifically with the unbound solution, which is multi-party as opposed to two-party. Everything is cryptographically still validated. You have distributed policy enforcement. This is really important. This is not one server validating the policy, but each and every one of the signers is validating the policy. Any ledger could be supported. No limitation as to the quorum size. We've been talking today a few times about five signers, but we have examples with ten signers, each of them holding just a key share. Approvers could be updated very easily. You could have offline approvers as we've talked about. And you could have optional hardware integration. So all of this is pretty much why Gartner is saying that MPC is the next-gen security infrastructure. Yeah. The main difference being that the sign takes place outside the ledger. Yes. In the multi-sig case, the signing has to be authenticated by the smart contracts, which can get pretty complicated. The complication in this MPC case is outside the ledger. So anyway, it's a very fascinating presentation by Rebecca. Thank you so much for showing up. And I hope you can share at least parts of these slides with us so that we can put them on the site. Obviously, it will have all your, you know, your marks on it. We are not going to alter anything. So that's that. And I'll put up the video of your presentation that you have already recorded in the audio as well. And you can use that for other purposes as well. So that's all for today. But Rebecca will come back for the capital markets next week. And we can talk about some of the high value institutional type custody, and the other types of custody, but basically it's a slightly different use case, but using IoT devices. Thank you. Thank you so much for everyone for taking the time to join. I know it's not, you know, obvious. So good morning, good evening, everyone. Hopefully we'll meet again next week. Bye-bye. Bye, thank you.


Hi everyone, Sean with jaspyscasebreaks.com here doing a random number block randomizer for the Eagles, Dolphins, Cowboys, Bills, Panthers, Colts, Saints, and the Raiders in 2021 National Treasures football collegiate football two-box pick a team at number three from a fresh case So it works just like every other random block where everybody gets a number from zero through nine If you get a number three will get all cards with three being the first number next to the slash on the left side of the slash So if the card is 13 out of 99 3 out of 25 43 out of 49 93 out of 99 and so on the number three with the card All redemption cards will go to the zero spot even if it does a known one-on-one it will still go to the zero spot And there you go Here is the list of customers that got in thanks to everybody for filling this up from joe down to joe Last spot mojo and the numbers from zero through nine dice roll were randomized both lists and pair them up Three out of three six times. Good luck guys Sixth and final time from joe down to joe and six times on the numbers Sixth and final time from one down to seven And there you go. Let's make this large enough for everybody to see Joe locus with one eric jock five ramonday. Jesus to joe locus eight shannon rex three antony lisca for joe locus zero six nine and seven There you go Let's sort this by number So joe with the zero spot gets any and all redemptions for these eight teams Even known one of one redemptions, but since he also has the one spot He doesn't need to worry because he'll get any live and in person one of ones as well And there you go That is the random number lock randomizer for the eagles dolphins cowboys bills panthers cults saints and raiders For 2021 national treasures football collegiate football two box picker team number three Break coming up next. I'm sean jaspiers case breaks.com. Thanks for hanging out. See you next time


What's up everybody? Jason here for jaspyscasebrakes.com last pack filler to unlock the mixer guys We're getting away the last eight spots in the mixer in 19 20 panini chronicles NBA fat pack random teams number 254 So again super high-risk high reward guys first We do the break randomized customer names and teams distribute hits out of the chronicles fat pack Then we will come back and randomize the customer names only what a new dice roller and the top eight will win spots in the Look at gold mixer, which is coming up next in the separate video So let's do the break first guys. Let's roll the dice and we got ourselves a one and a four or five times. Good luck one two three four five Kim Yang down to Ryan. All right five times One two three four five Bucks down to the Minnesota T wolf All right, so again stick with what you got guys and Anthony just quick noticeable when you have the Lakers We have the pelicans here with a guy grizzly's Ryan Crofts Dara you have the heat Etc. Etc. You guys stick with you guys again All right, so Let's quickly do the pack filler here. All right. We got second to a boy. I've got Kendrick none LeBron James Kevin Porter, Jr Jared Culver Luga Donchich Nicke Alexander Walker Anthony Davis bronze PJ Washington, Jr. DeAndre Hunter and a Zion bronze I have no idea Sean. I don't know if he's watching her. He's not in right now All right, there you go guys Very nice quick pack filler Now switch scenes. Let's get with the last eight spots in the mixture Let's roll it and we got ourselves a two and a five seven times. Good luck top eight get in one two three four five six and seven Seven times Guy you are in Brian Croft John Brian Croft again Brian Croft Matthew Hedges Matthew Quell and Kim Yang There you go top eight after seven times Congrats guys. You guys are now into the mixer itself and coming up next is the Luka gold 12 box basketball mix where we're giving away a $5,000 plus Luka RPA in the break So appreciate it guys Jaskies case breaks calm


from last workout, so I feel it. The first dunk wasn't my very first jump of the day, but it was my first attempt of a dunk. But I did a few jumps before that. Leg kicks, normal warm up, dribble moves, stuff like that, quick warm up, but feeling good already, haven't even broken a sweat. Go full speed, but my body doesn't feel ready for it yet, so I gotta wait for them to sink that. Shoulda had it.  It's not nearly where I want it to be, but I'm really happy with it, because it started to feel like a regular jump. I got some high jumps up the dribble, which feel good, and my body feels really good too, even though I did a strength day on Tuesday two days ago. My body feels healthy, but hopefully I didn't jump too much today. I'm gonna still lift a little bit explosively, and then stretch a lot, and hopefully Saturday I killed it. Let's go.


Old World, The term Old World is used commonly in the West to refer to Africa, Asia and Europe Afro-Eurasia or the World Island regarded collectively as a part of the World known to its population before contact with the Americas and Oceania the New World. It is used in the context of, and contrasts with, the New World the Americas and Oceania


All right, thank you. I'll be with you here, my friend. Zero, one, zero. Turn number, jump, one, zero, one, two, three. There's a sense of urgency that you can feel between the Marine Corps and the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force to not be afraid to innovate. Fire mission. Fire mission. To increase our procedures for coordination. One, zero, one, six. Turn number, jump. To increase our lethality. RD-21 was a dynamic exercise. Unlike anything that I've ever done out with 3MET for anywhere else, for that matter, in the fact that the scale, scope, complexity, and the willingness to experiment, the willingness to make changes, the willingness to test different concepts was there on both sides. We're increasing our capabilities at a rapid pace. During initial stage of Resolute Dragon 21, the focus was conducting a mixed mode dispersal to key maritime terrain. We used the combination of aviation platforms, surface level lift platforms, so that was a joint effort in order to build up combat power at our EAPs, spread throughout mainland Japan. We want to bring every domain to the fight. We don't want to leave anything off the table. It's important that we capitalize on all the strengths and all the capabilities that the Joint Force provides in order to enable the standing force to be able to conduct sea control and sea denial actions. Our next phase was to link up with the Japanese, conduct a series of bilateral air assaults onto key maritime terrain, and then to integrate joint force capability and Japanese capabilities that would affect sea control and sea denial. One of the most critical aspects of RD-21 is our ability to pair Japan's surface-to-ship missile regiment with naval capabilities that could sense targets. We share that information with the Japanese who are able to prosecute those targets. You can't look at the United States Joint Force or the Japanese individually. You have to pull all those capabilities together and look at it from a total. And there's some very interesting combinations of capability that you're going to now have to contend with. Once these are fused together, our ability to conduct multi-domain operations with our partner here in Japan is certainly a strength. That combination increases the cost of conflict to an unacceptable level, and that's exactly where we want it to be.


What's good, George, but Ross back again with another video. So we just finished watching the WrestleMania 40 press conference and boy, oh boy, they cooked. They cooked tonight involving the main event. There was a lot of questions, a lot of speculations. What was going to happen? I'm going to be honest with you personally, I did not think things were going to go the way they were. I actually thought that we were going to probably get the rock versus Roman this year and potentially Seth versus Cody is this year. I actually was believing that boy WWE. They cooked. They definitely cooked. We got to talk about what happened, man. We got into the meat and potatoes of this whole situation. Shout out to everyone that was a part of the live stream reaction on Twitch and on YouTube. We really do appreciate y'all. And let's get right into this, man. Let's let's talk about what went down for those who missed it. And if you did miss it, go watch it on Peacock right now. Just go to the the Seth Rollins when he comes out there, go to that part and then just sit back and relax and enjoy some good storytelling. So Seth Rollins comes out there. You know, nice green suit. The shoes was kind of questionable, but the suit was pretty tough. I like the suit he had on comes out there. Fans singing along to his song. And once again, he says, no pop, huh?  Hey, Cody, come on out here. Let's see who you're going to choose. Let's get this ball rolling. Romans music hit. Now I'm like, all right, business is picking up. Cody didn't come out yet. Roman comes out there. Roman comes out there does his usual acknowledge me, all this other stuff. And I like we finally get a little bit of interaction with them. It's been a while since they've had like a face to face interaction. And Seth proceeds to hit him with a jab, saying, oh, look who came to show up to work today. And Roman hit him with a jab with the and look who showed up in his wife's shoes today. Like his shoes is kind of wild.  But the shoes definitely was kind of wild. So I thought that was funny to have the little back and forth.  He let the moment pass him. So now I'm going to choose who I'm going to main event WrestleMania with or whatnot. And Seth was, you know, you can hear Seth in the back saying, you can't do that. He's I can do what I want or whatnot. And he basically was telling Seth and to me personally, and a lot of people were saying this in the chat, they were burying Seth.  He sat up there before he announced who he was going to choose to face at WrestleMania.  Get this bum out of here. And I'm like, damn, bro, just disrespected the world champion like here. Like that, like he's some joke. So after that, after more disrespect to Seth Rollins in his face. That's when he decides I'm going to choose the rock to main event WrestleMania. That's what Roman wants to do. Rock music comes out there and he got some booze. He got some cheers, but he got a lot of booze. He was trying to set up for the finally, but every time he was trying to do it. Every time he was trying to do it, he would get booze. He would get a lot more booze than cheers. And he's kind of listening or whatnot. There's some rocky chance. But you also hear booze and throughout the entire time.  All this other stuff. And you hear the Cody Chance, you hear it.  The rock versus Roman is the biggest match we can possibly put on for WrestleMania. It's the biggest match could possibly be the biggest match ever.  Majority of the crowd is still giving him booze. We want Cody Chance. It was very obvious and well known. The crowd didn't give a damn about what the rock majority of them was saying. So he started to. I guess you can say play into the heel, the heelism. He started playing into the hate. So he started. He even brought up him earlier today on the Pat McAfee show. The Cody crybabies. He brought that up and he brought that up again at the press conference. Got a lot of booze. And then he started getting into his bag on why this match needs to happen. He wants to show us something on why it needs to happen. And even before once he came out there and Roman had said what he said about wanting to face him and the rock is kind of, you know, pretty much saying this needs to happen. They put the graphic of Roman versus the rock. They put it right on the big Titan Tron screen behind them. So I'm like, ah, they were at this point, they're still working us. They're like, ah, damn, this is going to really happen. Like they're really, they're really going with this. So he's like, I got to show y'all something. Fans still booing. He shows us his huge family bloodline tree. I was like, oh, it's over at that point in my head. I'm thinking, damn, bro, that's GGs, bro. That the Cody story is done. They brought out the family tree. It's over. So, you know, he's talking about the family tree and how their fathers and grandfathers and stuff like that. They shook hands of blood oath, you know, to keep the family business going. And essentially, you know, he was saying that, you know, some people are going to like it. Some people are going to dislike it. But, you know, this needs to happen. And if you don't like it for those who don't like it, it doesn't matter if you don't like it. And the crowd starts booing because he's playing into the fact that this match needs to happen. This is the most important match because of our family. And there was one line in there that he said that was very important. And I knew for a fact he was starting to really heal it up. So he wanted to make the fact be known after showing this huge as bloodline family tree that he feels that there is only one royal wrestling family that matters. And that's the bloodline. And once he said that line, I'm like, oh, he's healing it up.  The fact that he's saying this is the only one that matters. The most powerful, most dominant. He's healing it up at that point and he didn't care.  Either you rock with it or you don't. This is what's just going to happen here. So at this point, crowd definitely is booing him. They're not liking what's happening here. And I love what they did here with Cody. His music didn't come on. He came out there. He's talking on the mic, making sure the mic work. And the first thing he says as as he comes out there to address everybody.  And I loved it. I thought that was one of the coolest lines Cody has ever delivered because we need a little bit more edge from Cody.  We need some more edge and that was fantastic.   I get to decide that because I won the Royal Rumble. So no, that's not going down like that. That's not happening like that. I want you to know and everyone else who I'm deciding. And it's simple. I will be facing you at WrestleMania in the main event this year. Crowd goes crazy. Roman gets pissed.  So he sits up there and say, what are you doing?  I've already beaten you.  I've already closed your story is over. I've already finished and done that.  Go over there and fight for the second place title. I've already I'm done with you. What are you doing?    You're you're irrelevant to me. You're irrelevant just like your father was irrelevant.  So he's like, oh, OK, since you want to talk about family, how good family is, let's talk about your family. Let's talk about yours. You know, if family's so good, where's Jay at? Boys start winning on where's Jay at? Oh, or let's talk about how basically people are just lackies. You pay them. It's not family, they're lackies. That's all it is. Roman taking off his jacket like he's about to do something. So Cody started to cook here at this point. After he got off the family stuff, he brought up the idea of rock versus rom. He's like, what does this matter? To see who's at the head of the table. Neither of y'all have been cooking for the past two years. So none of this really matters. What's the point crowd? Oh, in and on, Romans getting more upset. And then he really starts to get into his back. And now he said, you know what?  Let me bring them up since we're bringing up my father, your grandfather. The Rocks grandfather. How would they feel? Knowing what y'all doing? If anything, they would be ashamed of you. And boy, things. Now it was getting personal, it was getting heated. Roman steps up to him, but then the Rock steps in front of him. Rock picks up the mic and said, don't you ever disrespect our family like that ever again and proceeds to slap him. It's it's Cody Rose with the Will Smith slap right to the face. Cody's pissed. I was pissed.  Rock ain't about to slap me and get away with it. He's trying to get at him.  And bro, they they cursing and stuff. They have to bleep it out. It's getting it's getting real heated. Even Seth Rollins gets involved in the mix or whatnot. And Rock is over there and let him go. Don't you disrespect my family? Let him go.  Like they just going at it. Seth gets into the mix and he's over here telling off Rock and Roman. He's like, you think because you on the board of directors, you think you can do what you want? You can't do that. You can't do that. And the Rock, you can hear him say, we can do whatever we want. And he's talking trash to Roman Seth is.  Like, like it was so chaotic, but so good. I was like, oh, this is fantastic. And then they cut back to the panel. You got CM Punk on panel, Pat McAfee, Michael Cole and Biggie and CM Punk. While the Rock is still on the stage and I love what CM Punk was saying, because CM Punk was saying with the fans were thinking CM Punk was like, yeah. If I'm Cody, bro, I get the scratching and clawing and fighting.   Now screw all that talking. Let's get to fighting. I get now. He was like, Cody needs to he needs to he needs to get more aggressive. And I like that he put that out there. And hopefully that's a turn that we see doesn't have to be a heel, but he needs to get more aggressive. He was saying Cody needs to stop being diplomatic, be more aggressive because he just slapped you in the face. Now we ain't doing that. So then they cut back to Triple H having an interview. Someone backstage in the backstage area.  Like he's cussing at Triple H and Triple H like, hey, man, which I did. I wouldn't that wouldn't cool either.   Well, I'm going to slap the piss out of him again. Like he don't tell tell him we don't disrespect my family.  And I'm like, oh, things is cooking. Oh, this is so good. This was good. And after the press conference went off there, Triple H tweeted, and it's official, the rock, not the rock. Cody versus Roman Reigns at this year's WrestleMania to main event, most likely night two. It's official. We put it on Twitter, so it's happening. This was great. This was fantastic. Because now it opened up even more story possibilities. And one shout out to one of our subscribers on Twitch. I don't know if he subscribed, but he follows us on Twitch. But he came up with a pretty good idea. I think his name was B Boykins, B Boykins 2000 or something like that. He came up with a very good idea. What if this was all just a master plan by Cody? To to screw over Roman. Because he he said he talked to some people on Friday. Obviously, the rock was one of them. And he made it very clear that he wants to take everything from Roman. He wants to do. He doesn't want to take the title. He wants to take everything from him. And he knew he was going to probably need some help. Someone that knows him. What if this was all part of a a plan by Cody? Because that's the only way you can make this make sense. Because it seemed like Cody was cool with the rock taking his place only for him to not. So that's why I'm thinking. I think in what he was saying, the B Boykins on on Twitch would make sense. What would make sense is to have. Roman get his guard down. Have Roman feel like the rock is on his side because he wants to have this match because they're family. This is about family and that's what matters the most. Only for when the match happens for the rock to turn on him to stop solo or to stop Jimmy from interfering to not allow Roman to get any extra help he turns on him. And I think that would be a way that Cody meant this is what I meant, but I got to take everything from you. Make them make Roman believe that. The rock is not cool with him. The rock is not rocking with them. They they they play it up. They're literally working Roman. They're playing it up. Roman gets his guard down. You saw them walking together in the back when they confronted Triple H. And I do think maybe weeks leading into WrestleMania. The rock and Roman are going to have segments together and it's going to be potentially a power play. And it's going to be a situation where maybe at some point the rock is going to be trying to call the shots and it's going to create a little bit of dissension there. But ultimately it's going to be a respect thing because we all know who the rock is only for the rock to still low key be working with Cody to make sure there's no shenanigans that get involved into their main event match, which we know will happen. And this is another good way to make rock baby face because when you do this right now to the people, he's a heel. He's a heel. He just slapped the baby face. He's a heel, but you have him turn on Roman and be one of the reasons why Roman finally loses. Now you can really build the story between the rock and Roman Reigns going into this year's Summer Slam and next year's WrestleMania because Roman will be distraught. His family is not listening to him as much. He lost loses the championship. Like it's it's going to cause some turmoil within the bloodline. And that's how you can extend that story because we're going to have a solo match between Roman and a rock. It's going to happen. The question is when and where. And I think this is the catalyst to make that happen. Also, I feel like what they did with this story is different because Cody is over now than he was last year about when he was about to face Roman. And that is a fact. People have gotten behind Cody because of this rock situation. When you can have the fans, what in the rock during his during his promo like they did tonight? When you can have the fans booing the rock of all people. He hasn't been booed since like 03 when you have the fans doing that, voicing their opinions all over social media about the displeasure. That's when you know you got something. Cody is the most over he's ever been in WWE. And that's crazy to say. So they changed the story in a sense to pretty much. I guess you can say help Cody get even more over, be even more of a sympathetic baby face because on paper it looks like now Cody has to deal with the rock and Roman and the rest of the blood line because, quote unquote, he's disrespected their family. It's going to be a tough road ahead for him. And they needed to switch it up because you don't want to go into this year's WrestleMania with the same storyline. So they had to tweak it. It's it's now how is he going to really overcome these odds even more? And also probably what having the rock come out there last week, I could see them either trying to test the waters to see how the fans would react. And they got the reaction, but it probably wasn't what they were expected. So they called an audible, which there's nothing wrong with calling them audible to if they switch plans. That is fine. I wish there's been so many times in WWE history where they should have called an audible and maybe this is one of those situations. Either way, this story is good. This is this is good. I'm loving what they're doing now. They got people really interested and it's going to be very interesting to see how does this play out? What what is Cody going to say on Friday Night Smackdown? How is the rock and Roman going to really work together? In this situation, what's going to happen with that dynamic? It's going to be very interesting to see what's going to happen leading up into WrestleMania. But this was fantastic. You haven't gone and seen the press conference. Go check it out. It's worth your time and y'all comment down below. Let me know how do y'all think this story is going to play out? Do y'all think that this is all part of Cody's plan? This whole situation, then the rock and Cody getting into it. Do y'all think it's part of his plan to destroy Roman from within the blood line? Because obviously the rock can get close to them because he knows them. Do y'all think it's part of his plan? Because I I do think that is that could be a possibility. Or y'all let me know if y'all think, you know, the rock is going full heel. Do y'all believe that he's going full heel now? Or, you know, let me know some other scenarios. What y'all think is going on? Because I definitely think this is more. There's more to this story than just what we saw tonight. And I'm looking forward to enjoying the ride. But I appreciate all the love and support. Road to 150K. And I'm still here to speak to you to the wrestling champion of the world. Appreciate y'all kicking in with me. See y'all in the next one. Peace.


Most insurance agents really struggle with phone sales, actually taking someone that has interest in talking to a specific product or service and then converting that telephonically all over the phone. I'm going to give you five things that every insurance agent needs to be great at phone sales. The absolute five things that you need to incorporate into your business to be successful with phone sales. I've also got a free tele sales training webinar tomorrow Saturday at 10am. I'll put the link below. You can register. It's totally free. So I'm going to go over five different things that every insurance agent needs when it comes to phone sales and why specifically that thing is important. So the first thing is you need to have training. Every insurance agent needs to know what to do, when to do it, how to do it, where to do it, exactly all the details. When it comes to training and when it comes to closing business and when it comes to converting someone from hello to thank you for your business. When it comes to training, you need videos. You need scripts. You need specifically how to overcome objections. You need to know what the total sales process is. When it comes to training, you need everything related to actually converting someone into a sale. Right now, everyone needs to start to learn and incorporate more skill level when it comes to converting people over the phone. I've been selling with phone for years. I absolutely love it. I opened a call center years ago from scratch with no phone sales experience. I was able to over the next few months get up to about 40 sales per month. Not too long ago, a few years ago, I was actually able to convert about 60 grand over the course of four or five weeks all over the phone. I documented that journey. I love the phone. I'm passionate about the phone. I know that a lot of insurances can be successful over the phone if you have the right training materials. The next portion is the actual resources. What type of resources do you need? What do you need to know when it comes to those scripts? Are you using live transfers? Are you using leads? What are you saying in the intro of that specific type of call as all of them will vary? Also, what does it look like from a sales standpoint, from a process standpoint, when you take a live transfer and you're rolling through the first three minutes of a call, which are extremely super important? Harvard says that the first four seconds of a phone call is powerful and super valuable and important to get someone's attention in those first four seconds. I also believe that the first 60 seconds are paramount when it comes to converting people into sales. I'm going to be touching on all these things in tomorrow's free tele-sales training webinar, tele-sales mastery webinar, totally free. Put the link below. When it comes to resources, everything that you need to know, what do you need to know and what exactly do you need to have in your repertoire that you could literally pull out of your tool bag and use it to convert people over the phone. It's not that phone sales is that much different than face-to-face, but it definitely has its differences, has its similarities, but at the end I'm going to share with you what can separate you from the average agent out there that is falling out of the business and that can't convert people over the phone. So the next one is resources. Third, what's the third one? The third one has to do with marketing. What options do you have when it comes to leads? What type of leads should you be working? What does all this pertain to? What does that look like when it comes to, hey, I've got leads or maybe I'm doing marketing services. Whether it be Google AdWords, Facebook Ad Management, YouTube Leads, which we're doing a lot of now. Or whether it be actually building a YouTube channel for prospects to then go reach out to you through your website or your landing page, become a lead or even call in. So when it comes to marketing, what are the top call centers in the country doing that I have such a great relationship with? I'm going to share all that on tomorrow's webinar as well. Also, when it comes to marketing leads, I've created a, and I'm going to link it below as well. I've created a telecells mastery membership that I'm going to waive the joining fee for the first 100 members. So make sure that you click the link below and I'll waive that so that you can get in that. So when it comes to leads, marketing service, what else? What type of live transfers should you be working? Or should you be working them? I'm going to make sure that in that membership, not only do we have a discount on full state telecells leads, also have a discount on any marketing service related, also a discount with preferred vendors when it actually comes to live transfers. Everything that you're going to need, I'm not only going to cover it on the free webinar, but I'm also going to give you access to everything that I know, all the relationship that I have and everything that you can have access to when you become a part of this telecells mastery membership. Again, I'm going to waive the $297 joining fee for the first 100 members and then it's simply $97 a month. I want to make this accessible for anyone because these five things, it's good to have them, but if you don't have access to somewhere that can make you better and that you can learn, most people are struggling because they have the wrong information. What I've learned a long time ago is when I have the right information, I have a higher chance of actually being successful. So marketing, what type of marketing are you doing? What type of automation and follow up could we be doing together? Because that's some of the things I consult on and teach on in our Scourage and Marketing and Scourage Leads Company. It does this for people where you could actually have a thank you page with a video you're talking and a button to link to your calendar to immediately encourage them to go and book a free strategy session or a consultation or a quick call or a strategy call on your schedule. We're seeing as high as 30, 40% actually going and filling out a request to talk to you right away and actually automating all of that so that you can walk into a complete full calendar of appointments and people that are interested and you're not having to do as much some but not as much outbound dialing because you have all these things set up. So I want you to think about that. After marketing, something else that's extremely important when it comes to telecells is technology. Not only am I going to talk about this in tomorrow's free webinar, but I'm also in this telecells mastery membership that you can get in right now for the first 100 people I'm waving the joining fee. I'm adding specific discounts when it comes to headsets, when it comes to a dialer, when it comes to a CRM, anything technology wise that you would need to when it comes to what type of calendar software should be using to get automated appointments through your calendar. Everything when it comes to technology, these technology pieces are super important because you need someone with it. When you're getting leads, you can call through them. You create a pipeline of funnel. You can have these leads in different stages. You can close them. They can become a client or even after even up on lead submission, they're getting automated emails and texts from you so that you can actually convert them easier. Everything when it comes to technology, I'm going to only address that. But in the membership, I'm going to give you discounts for everything because my network now have a lot of amazing relationships with people that I can give dialers and CRMs and everything else at a discounted rate, simply because of the volume and the amount of attention we have, the amount of following we have now, thankfully because of all you like the content. We want to be able to give back and be able to give those to you at a discounted rate. Technology is super important when it comes to phone sales. It comes to tele-sales. The technology you're using can be the big separator between success and failure. I really believe that. Also, what's next? The fifth one, what am I missing? Well, you need actual products and carriers, which carriers are popular when it comes to phone sales. Do they have an electronic app process? Do they have a voice signature process? What type of process do you want? And what's everything that you need when it comes to actually choosing the right carrier? Do you need one carrier? Do you need three? Do you need five? Do you need 50? What type of carriers do you need when it comes to phone sales so that you can make this easy and simple? Because the more questions you have, new people struggle with two things. Every new sales person struggles with two things. Not knowing what to do. Well, I'm going to tell you what to do. And then struggling with what to use. We want to take out all the guess work when it comes to actually getting graded phone sales and becoming a master of phone sales. Right now is a perfect time for you to learn phone sales and become amazing at it. Literally, the new membership covers all type of these things. These are the five things you get to figure out right now for you to get good at phone sales. Training. Where are you getting your training and where is it available? Resources. What resources do you have and where are they available? What type of marketing services are you doing? What about marketing inbound, outbound, or leads? Are you doing to where you can consistently have a system that produces results every single week? But where's the technology? What type of technology is best to use for phone sales? Because it differs from face to face. And what type of carriers are available and that are best for actually converting individuals over the phone? So not only do we have a free webinar where I'm going to train you on all these things for free. Saturdays at 10 a.m. I'm going to link the registration link below. Please make sure you sign up. It's totally free. Also, I'm going to put a link to our Telesales Mastery membership for the first 100 members. I'm going to waive the joining fee of $300. You don't have to pay the $300 joining fee. I'm going to put the link below.  Hey, if you love this video, stop what you're doing. Click right there. I've got another phone sales video with tips specifically for you to convert people over the phone. Click on that video and I'll see you there. Today, I want to talk about five easy phone sales tips that you can implement right away and see success with. So stay with me as I go through each one of these.


The Battle of Midway holds a significant place in naval history. The battle which took place June 4th through June 7th, 1942 is widely viewed by many to be the turning point of World War II. During the battle, the U.S. Pacific Fleet sank four Japanese carriers that were involved in the attack on Pearl Harbor. In commemoration of the battle's 71st anniversary, historians from the Naval History and Heritage Command, Pentagon operation leaders, and representatives from the USS Midway Museum will participate in a discussion panel. It will look at how naval capacity in the Pacific affects the interests of the nation today. The panel will be aired live June 3rd at 2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time from the Pentagon through Google Hangout. If you're interested in watching the panel, go to the Navy's Google Plus page at google.com slash plus U.S. Navy. From the Defense Media Activity, I'm Petty Officer Matthew Halls.