Good morning, everybody. Welcome back to another live stream. Hopefully you guys doing great. I'm finally early No, I haven't been late too long, but still it's good to be on time We'll go over yesterday. I mean we have five minutes till sort of the major sort of news pop I 30. I mean yesterday was a Entirest news first as like I said yesterday I Decided to instead trade instead of trading just go asleep because I didn't see any merit Yesterday and again, I wasn't sort of wrong in that assessment. Just pretty much sideways trading But I mean sideways trading can be both good and bad. I mean looking at sort of how this has been Broken up. I mean there's addition of longs interesting, but still holds majority short, which is Ideal if you wanted a bullish case scenario that we all tend to play looking to play out yesterday more so now as As I was again working the lows pretty even Mmm, not pretty evenly. Yeah, pretty even. Let's say if you sort of contrast this as sort of zero point You can say it's been sort of holding off and sort of saying this is my low and I want to go high Again, you're probably looking to enter into Positions somewhat now ish just because it is gonna be a news release So again, it's gonna have to be a super time sensitive sort of crunch here Probably trying to do the inverse of whatever this ends up doing so it's looking like we're probably gonna have of your first swing down But in case it leads into a whipsaw where it just does this. It's something you have cognizant of Again, the reason why I made trials on time today because today is pretty much Living and dying off of this so It made sense to be on time 830 is pretty much all we have 830 10. That's it. Like there is there is no sort Saving grace in terms of oh look some some random news will come in and save us now there's only 830 which is Two minutes where we have that major news We're already setting up for it. It just looks like They're building up so Make sure of shorts and you can see the squeezing on they've already set up the walls up here expecting sorts of some level squeeze So I think I wait for the I mean if you want to risk it you want to risk it But I would say wait for a potential Whipsaw motion to clear clear out all this Bad if I thought that we're getting shorts for some reason coming in Prior to this even though we did end up going higher. It looks like someone's biz just got activated on that sort of volatility That was just coming in out of nowhere So I mean breaking it down in front and just zoom in get rid of the major sort of short area Just to look at and concentrate this it's still pretty heavy short, which is always a good sign if you if you want to be bullish So I mean you can chalk this up and and hopefully it ends up sort of pulling down But the fact that this went short is it's a spanner So maybe a quick dip like a date and maybe we can target these higher sort of brackets Hopefully today is a lot better than yesterday again. Like I said yesterday was a snooze day But makes it make sense that it was a snooze there mean we work tires We work the lowest highest leaf, but I mean not really a snooze fast I mean as it builds up was somewhat Somewhat there, but I mean realistically you can see it was just uh, it just dies as they just dies And it just lets itself consolidate short Uh, there we go 830 come in Looks like they just won't there we go come on come on Come on you can do it Now is probably the time to look at book map more than anything Uh, just because you get tick beta rather than just looking at It kind of going up and down Again, still worry about this big tick short That you put the span in trying to say, oh, yeah, definitely would just go down first swing But it does look like he's going down first thing, which is great Uh, this did end up going away Uh, but again first swing probably looking for it to slam back up Already getting longs and interesting enough. So we'll probably dig deeper. Maybe Uh, interesting to see bridge probably kind of front run the larger one here The large one is a single entity. You can see that so again, they front run Front they're in those bids. Hopefully they get punished and Punishing is coming out.  It's just it's just something to wait on Again, notice how I haven't looked at the numbers because they don't bloody matter Like one bloody bit. It's just what is what is the order? What are the orders saying? It's pretty much all you really care about And you get we get really far in terms of uh Uh micro analysis like just like on the charts like if you're just interdating trading like without Getting heed to it in terms of long understanding longer trends. Of course, you want to uh Uh, see where things are going so you can try forecast stuff But generally all that really matters where orders are like that. That's all it is Again, like It's a massive Ponzi like everything. It's just about taking someone else's money. So it doesn't really matter Uh, what kind of uh climate we're in The only thing that climate changes is the type of investors you get That's pretty much it and the type of traders get so they adapt the Adapt the tactics but at the same time don't really change too much. It's just where the majority is All the way the majority of Other people money is Is where they're targeting again, they're just sort of hanging around So there you got a mixture of lungs coming in again. I don't think this holds too Often within this bar. I think we sort of want to start digging a bit deeper soon Uh, so hopefully we sort of at least target these sort of uh stops here to try to collect uh more liquidations Especially if we're looking for a large larger move on the offset I mean, we can dig deeper all the way into this area here Uh, we've got a massive sort of stop at this at this level here at 20, uh, 23 300 So that's sort of where You're probably if you're trying to catch a falling knife You're not looking to catch a falling knife at that point At that point, you're just uh looking to probably just be on a uh double bottom if you sort of see it Below this 33 300 area So that's sort of where you allow your sort of spread to sort of reach because again Stop gaps nice and all and we allow it But if it sort of starts falling it will just continue to fall and then this you got to have sort of a A mental stop where You've got to admit you're wrong and I think past 33 300 It's something worth not catch catching Unless you get a confirmation of something else Pretty much it So I don't know anything's pretty decent To sort of say that will potentially get some long out of it again This is just here as probably for the swing because they're gonna Probably be very flawless out of filing about this Uh, especially if they collect uh the required amount of shorts again Very large sort of offset coming in here zoom out more You can see just break up Of course we got long but majority of it is shorts and some of that some of them rightly sold out of the market So we'll take those out of view and just focus on the ones that are Still within sort of market grasp and you can see sort of how we're adding shorts here So everything here is acceptable and the 3300 sort of sock gap that I talked about Sort of there you go There's that sort of phantom bid that will come and goes as soon as we get close to it And as you can see it's all pretty heavy shorts to assume out But we know there's a there's a mixture uh mixture of sort of uh Longs coming in just sort of trying to be uh coy with this area Uh, so if we run these guys out again, you're expecting to try to target these areas on the next sort of swing Uh, and this is one of the days where you sort of expect that to happen Uh, now sort of next sort of um, I mean we've got our 830 coming in So now next sort of area we're looking for is that 1030. So, uh, let's sort of mark that out and I'm Not 1030 just 10 There we go, there's that 830 marker which we got something out of it next marker we're marking out is sort of 10 o'clock Uh, I know And if you've been here for a while, you know 10 o'clock's usually our preferred times When there's nothing going on. Like I said, you might have to jump in earlier Uh When you get uh news, but mostly you're fine coming out 10 10 15 looks like uh I mean, let's move this down to 10 15. Maybe we get something solidified around here the genera is uh Not it's just fine fine. Just fine. Let's sort of start a basket, I guess You can see under it It's more of the same just all we got to do is wait play the winning game game That's what most trading is and sort of targeting stops out. It's just Identifying zones identifying patterns And just reacting. Yes, it's probably looking to target down here I mean we've been looking for it for a while and hopefully it finally hits But other than that not really too much. I mean it shows some life here But at the same time it trapped itself here. So And that being it sort of gave its hand sort of at this point here There you go. There's your inverse head and shoulders that Played out accordingly to retails of people bought the breakout here And even did it twice. So they got them twice I think oh, that's not hurt themselves. I don't know what it is. I don't care I know all I know retail will see that as the head and shoulders And then again doesn't matter Like just because it doesn't work. You've got a sort of strange definitions now. Really now I know a hundred percent of people will still call this the head and shoulders They say oh, yeah, the brick lines here Sorry, I'm a bit tired. So I'm going to be very sort of salty towards certain people certain things and ideologies Hopefully no ideologies that will get me cancelled.  Can I see more shorts? Uh News no reaction. What do you mean no reaction? There's reaction If there's not a reaction, I don't know what is just can't just because it's not moving doesn't mean it's not reacting And this is where bookmap helps They would look at that. It just knows dive like 600 lost in like this small of a gap and you And you're saying there's no reaction. Come on, man. Come on Come on, mate For your top two Come on like how is that not a reaction? I see that now Oh, someone's trying to buy it again. How the hell? I mean, they had a sort of choke bid that came and went Instantly sorry it's late. Oh, no, it's fine. Like I'm usually late. So it's no issue It's fine like I mean that that's why you have bookmap like no reaction Yes, there was reaction and still is a reaction someone's still looking to capture this knife I think it's a bit too early for that But it's yet to be seen. Oh instantly sort of traded the opposite way. You can see the fighting now You can see that sort of moving back into the short side of things Probably can target a 23600 and all honestly from the drop We'll see again that choke and bid came went and went really fast. So it's just like A lot of indecision here. I mean it came in the right side though It like just they held for a millisecond. They came in and just said whoop. Nope Don't want to enter the wrong bid Again, uh It's kind of what we like to see if you want to be long But ease coming in buys here is not really do interesting I mean we have five more minutes till this bar closes. So Uh, look look to come out of it In finally took out these tops and I think that was that large explosion and that we saw on the bids And instantly for the back leg stop on rise Uh, but yeah, maybe maybe not again. We still have 10 Uh, we still have 10 we still have 2300 as like a safety bid anyway. So We're to vibing with chilling There you go Off by 0.1.  I should retire from trading come Uh, let's see what what the news is saying bonds are stopped so wrong Oh, no Let's see what blackrock blackrock has to say to the masses Uh, the final session of wall street, uh holiday shorted, uh the weekend You see pretty much smack down in the middle of As it's inhabited uh one three months dips getting uh bought up and rips get rips sold I think you could mean the inverse People selling dips because they're scared people buying tops because they don't want to miss out It's the opposite man. Get it right stop selling people dreams man. You can't buy bottoms Oh, you can but people don't buy bottoms man Like bell bottoms went out of fashion in the 90s man, please Not really too early 2000s. I think you can still rock them. Uh, who knows depends Actually, no, that's an interesting question. Should bell buttons make a comeback? I I think yes I generally did like I don't know. Maybe it's an acquired taste and all the kids like, well, what's a bell bottom? Other genes the corduroy's young gris Okay Back to the news enough digression Uh news of the bulls benchmark index blah blah blah remains from five percent up the year, which is nice Uh, and it's gained 12 percent from october though. Ah, okay, cool However, the rebounds is based on narrative of incomplete outcomes, which ultimately may come May be bad news for risk access Ones about correct. So they're telling you to be scared, which is nice. That's probably a time to sort of consider adding some positions At first why the rallies team at black rock investments institution risk led by a genre bovine What's a bovine? It'll be bovine Notice that the assets jumped at the start of 23 thanks to the fall of inflation lower energy prices in europe china Rapid reopening as coveted restrictions were lifted and what in terms of uh, technical factors many investors were overly bearishly positioned. So I think it's just basically just so many people Uh, people expected the worst worst outcomes and they got they got mildly worse outcomes One minute till the spark closes, so we still have time to read for this tedious article Yet we think that the rallies also reflects hopes that the sharper central bank policy tightening in decades can avoid Occupant damage growth will be sustained through rates staying higher and inflation will drop to two percent targets central bank then would uh wouldn't would not rather Need to further tighten policies and create recessions through low inflation. Interesting Uh, oh Stock market appears, uh, to most pleases at this two year Treasury are partly sensitive to the federal residency policies and sits near highest.  Uh, so far in february Now bond markets are waking up to the risk of feds Uh rates higher and holding. I mean That does kind of spell an issue if if bond bonds are going up Actually, no, you know what it would be a wild wild, uh Actually, I mean, no people. Um, that's 15. This is going daily.  I mean You two why is everyone's running not really too interested? Uh But once what's the treasury saying? I mean Teres is Hold on People like to sell off this would they probably I think and looking at it Subjectly, I know Don't worry about it. Only up has an only down as well And only down has an only fans So, please Uh, I mean we're sort of like in this sort of pocket here We're sort of waiting for it to close here. I think that will sort of sentiment like Sort of come back down and sort of balance everything out everything sort of will be rosy uh But the same time everything sort of is In terms of the long time frame even sort of Even the future the stuff of the only issue is the future the market that doesn't look sort of uh Appetizing Like it doesn't look like a snack Uh You know, let's stop being boring Uh longs come again Probably for it to undercut one more time catch all these guys out saying they are like what the bottom Oops. No, sorry We'll see if they continue this trend till uh 10 10 10 15 If they do, I would be surprised. Uh, maybe even looking for I wonder if we do that one of these where it goes in goes in and boom then recovers Uh at that at that marker here But we'll see. I mean there's not really too many markers after this So it just goes into a float 10 o'clock when we solidify this range Uh again, this is the maximum you're allowing it to go 2300 before uh Without seeing a double bottom I would say like if you want to catch a knife You only catch a knife until it's here After that, it's just double bottom or nothing Uh, generally speaking Uh, yes, it's slowly coming to a halt. I guess, uh, maybe one more swipe We'll see if it has it in it To reach it all the way down to this daily love on hold it It's looking like it's stacking up shorts, which is uh more than what we can ask for Again, just more of the same sort of uh Illness or sickness whatever you want to call it cut out from the same things where people are trying to catch the first dip Uh again looking for those to try and uh Take those guys out Nicest way Maybe nice really just take them out just remove them to capitate them finish them Whatever they need to do, uh before sort of trying to pull it back up Let's sort of look at old coins. I mean We don't really matter because they don't mean to care too much. Everything just follows each other It's like in some kumbaya stages Uh, I mean to some of this to less than magnitudes. I guess uh again Ethereum same old story struggle it struggled at that monthly Backdown it goes Uh at this point, I don't think it ever will survive this It's just the store. It's the story is all the time. Uh What would I say? Yeah, I guess I could say that Uh, as you can say 16 20 does look like a decent sort of area to be comparable to where You may want to sort of hold your horses out at catching this As a worse sort of case scenario, but right now it's just collecting shorts at this area here Both you can make a breakthrough and finally again go back and stay above it. Most importantly Is it's key this monthly level? It's just Playing uh, is The nicest word you can say with it. It's just playing But we know it's not playing. It's just struggling.  I can't I'll let your guys head fill in what joke I was going to insert in there Fill in the blank stuff that will get me cancelled Uh, yeah, I have so much restraint Uh, I'm so poised. Uh, I mean more of the same thing from atom coming back down. We're looking for that daily I mean, maybe slightly high actually we said Uh, I think it's been a lot faster. So we'll see how it's just on it You can remember what exact number was but yeah, it's just on it. Uh, I mean daddy's trust right there It's reaching but I don't think it reaches that far But that it's finding yourself comfortable, especially if bitcoin Just catches its breath uh in in in this couple of In this sort of time that he has So, I mean it'll catch its breath. Maybe you get something like this. Maybe we do get that double bottom uh, I mean For last time these greens have just been Flipping up and sure we got that double bottom but comes in just gives you basically Crumbs relative to what uh the initial one gave but generally This one's always safer than catching the first on the swing Like for instance, this one is much safer to catch here than it was here Uh, so it might be more of the same element where next sort of double bottom Or second leg would we do that? Uh, ethnic Okay, yeah, I'll have a look at it Look at that snacks Probably have to use sport data I haven't had this much It's actually double check future data is see how far back it goes. Let's use as long as like comparable to us april Uh, December Yeah, I guess it's comparable. I think we can use this. Yeah, it's usable I mean, would it make sense to use? Yeah, it would See the smoke out that weekly There you go. There's there's your weekly resistance There's your tightest range There's your tightest range possible Just looks like barrier tops. It's like gatekeepers Uh, actually, let's try that spot spot again and see how far it goes back on the monthly Yeah, not much difference. Cool. So most people will be trading this futures. Uh Again, you guys go understand, uh, depending on what you choose you get different data sets Because volume is different. This is not like just a standard plug and play. Oh, you're all charts the same No The people you get traded are slightly different Uh, your benchmarks are slightly different. That's why there's some variants do this It helps when things are unified, but we know we're not gonna really get that Unless we delete or Unless like we get just one Like we get one broker we get like We get yeah one broker just to come in just say you look everyone You guys are just like storefronts But we get one data feed everything is unified We pool everything. So if we go down we all go down Uh, yeah, it just looks like that resistance. I mean, uh, just coming between here. I mean It's between a rock and a hard place. That's all I can really say uh from this Uh, it has to sort of escape multiple uh multiple prisons just sort of uh be in contention And this doesn't look really too healthy looking at it from a daily point of view Uh, sort of jump in lower I feel like my voice sounds dry as in like I sound disinterested, but I assure you it's it's far from me being disinterested Or maybe a bit. I don't know It's just more I don't know. Yeah, it's more of an application of me being tired. I guess Uh, some recovery, which is nice, uh See how far that takes. I don't think it takes it too far again Just more of these biops see if that goes down on this thing Uh, it doesn't matter that we recover again Uh, you're probably looking for that safe option again if it's landed itself here We're probably rejecting that anyhow We'll see how far it rejects and you can see how Next sort of you're probably you know next set of news will probably affect it Uh, and again, it just depends on sort of these sort of areas. I think we rate more on 10 15 than we do 10 but I should know it Cells very care and patient in here. Yeah, they can 10 10 is still important Uh, personal income below below personal spendings up Pretty crazy.  What? Uh, nice What are you just gonna come? Yeah Yeah, nothing against that means moving down. You can see three hits to the law. I mean Everything it's it's it's looking to go up But it's just like, okay. Do you want to catch the falling knife or you do it just want to wait? And again, you probably want to wait. I mean if it's lambda it goes down Just goes for one more hill mary before it comes up again. That's what probably this 10 30 to uh 8 30 to 10 Any town vibes? Come on man. Only up man.    Let's read this uh personal spending in the u.s jumped uh 1.8 percent month in months uh rebounding from uh downward the Downward the revises of when one dropped into December Uh and beating the market forecast of uh 1.3 percent rise It's the biggest increase since March 21. It shows consumer spending uh started slightly spending on a strong foot. Yeah Uh with goods increasing uh as was widespread and led to motivator causes as well as uh parts of other non-durable goods that led by pharmaceutical interesting Within services the largest computers in increasing uh spending food service okay Food service increase of course Like you know how expensive eggs are Eggs are super expensive no wonder everyone was spending more I think it's that everyone's Grudgingly spending more rather than thinking the economy means safe.  Oh Uh, because what was it? Where are you incomes down? Like, I mean what previous actually incomes personal incomes up Which is nice, but People are just spending a lot more And it's probably begrudgingly considering The first thing people spend uh spend more on was food Like was food There you go food after adjusting prices, uh The real personal spending scored thawed by 1.1 percent That's good to have the readjust one because again you got adjust for everything Rebounding from the fall of 0.3 Probably adjusted figure Again It does show us stepping in the right direction direction people are spending But I don't I don't think it's entirely uh wholly Just because they're probably spending due to prices being higher and and food again It's just because of supply chain issues that we could drive that's just forced to pay more for food Yeah, I mean, I don't I think the food prices like from what I've been hearing food prices been going up again, I think they have like I wouldn't be able to tell you Well, I don't buy food I do it's just Just I don't I just buy the same thing. So I either have it. I'm not caring if it goes up or down Just Buying necessities and that's it There we go the one little doji coming in. Hopefully we get that swipe down further targeted the further target these areas In just the build up of sort early lungs Probably not too healthy Especially because we were being clear. It's just but it's just nice that we have these sort of bids up here It's just waiting for it to act fast and sort of try and grab those grab as much liquidity as you possibly can Again I'm gonna go about probably at this far And it's just collection of shorts here, which is nice moving down so what we want to see sort of Probably the best-case scenario, uh, maybe got sort of drop that down again. Yes does Just have that extra bit of leg room that you can afford itself So we'll see if it does afford itself that extra leg room and sort of hit out into here Maybe even hang a hang a bit to try and catch those bids out Uh before sort of actually committing to being an uh Being an only upstream But I mean over the last couple of sort of days, I mean to a week. It's just been slowly going down Um, and you can see sort of where things have opened as well as where the volumes have been Concentrated it's just been on mostly on the short side of things. You can see on this bar here This one's more even distributed This one being sort of heavily distributed to the high so you can tell that was there were longs coming in here Especially this one here. You can see that first half being heavy long pulling down. I mean So I'm trying to grab everything out here, uh, and probably try and move it up from there But I don't know. There's not really too much to add. There's not really too much to say we came in early You guys just need to wait for it. I just need to finish up I just want to op usd Oh, oh my god, only up In the banners features c5 action. I remember doing this one time Yeah, there we go. I did this one time uh I mean you can see why I like these levels like They're just nice Yeah, it's just trapping long volume up here. You're probably looking short this soon in you how Uh, it's like overhanging on this Yeah, and I mean, yeah, maybe catch some more relief here. Who knows but generally We'll see if you just fall through into stronger magnets if you fall through again, you're catching you out 2.8 ish Uh, see if you can get that sort of rounds Uh, rounds it up here here. Oh, yeah about 2.8 even not 2.75 Rounds down just got this sort of range to play with in terms of stop-hands this area to sort of collect volume Uh, but again first sort of areas here I got multitudes of areas you can sort of look for but It all depends on what the market is and ends up feeling today Uh, so just play the levels accordingly. I think it drops down further We'll see if it drops down sort of 2.9 first If it holds it, you're probably looking for a balance, but generally you're probably, uh, airing on the Very side with for this But again, you have these levels just places numbers on your charts and you and you should be fine Going down further Nothing more to add.  And this is just sharing new asses for everybody. I mean Yeah, again, it's just not really too much to add into things that I don't they don't like the look of most things right now I mean, they're just making the way downtown Uh Sorry, that was that's terrible in Doors looking for that job and look for a time Just if you're looking for blood, you'll see it happen. It's just We've got our first time that we wanted for that down Oh, it's three five Yeah, I guess so Uh That was a time that was a long time ago, man That feels like a long time ago. It's just start of the week.  Okay. Yeah. I mean as long as you're selling here. I mean it makes sense to sell I mean Here this There you go Yeah, look there you go. You're back here You can probably buy your time back all the way to 24 500 Before you actually can make a commitment like it's got that option playing out for it. That's the thing You've got options You dare like What do you want me to go live on on the discord? I'm live on the I was going I can't unmute you guys for you on the uh Book map discord if I asked them like give me on how to trade live And not really like it's not my style I mean, it's just not my style. It's because if I if I if I make a mistake that does Which I know I know it's very far in few few between but it's just like I don't know. It just it just focuses on me trying to like manage just manage someone else's emotions stuff like that And like people get said oh, no, I missed out. Oh, no It said I just give you the tools So you know how to do it yourself And then you can make your own mistakes And it's just like I I just always would feel bad Like if I told someone something wrong like even though like I have a good track record, but I've been like Still like I don't have 100 track record. That's the thing I was 100 sure, but I'm not 100 like at best.  Uh, yeah, we're probably entering somewhere here I'm not explicitly explicitly saying enter here. So I can sort of slowly absolve myself of any sort of blame It's like, uh, cool. He said I can probably enter Just depends on how it looks it didn't look right to if it doesn't look right to you doesn't look right to you It's straight investor emotions. Like, oh, okay. So like I said, you get far doing the opposite things Like if I said go short here, like I say, uh, like a price might come up here. Tap this and go down But you just didn't really want it because you saw, oh, it's gonna break out instead. You bought that. That's you you bought Like, uh, because you believe in the breakout but Generally, it was like, oh, it's going higher. It's going higher. But let's say you do enter here and like And then you end up saying, oh, no, let me cut it here.   That's the thing emotions get the best of you sometimes Like sometimes I'm just not in the best mental states because I'm not I'm not like Balanced as a person and just collecting shorts She's for money to make more Yeah, exactly And you just kick yourself like, ah, I should have used more like, ah, let me enter a dumb trade just just to make more money Then you start losing profit No, I mean here you go. You're collecting shorts. I mean it's just doesn't stand a chance. I mean you're going lower Makes sense. I mean Makes sense because if you start zoom again, we know there's longs being collected Just it's just hunting for lower but at the same time It's just building up the shorts Slowly, uh, but surely again you can see those Probably go for a bit deeper man.  What are you waiting for? Actually, that's a rhetorical question because the waiting for market open let's see Yeah, 9 30 10 you got 10 10 10 15 trade times anyway Uh In those times you're looking to trade just because of just because of the news Uh, so even if the market reacts, uh, you're you're you're reacting a bit later Uh, just for sound sound of mine Uh, it only happened four times since uh 1980 every time had brought in a larger crash. I Uh, 1999 2000 In 2018 all had rates inverted and they started correcting back and my crush. Yeah You know, that's not a bad thought. Uh I mean and here's the thing like Even without seeing the rates were inverted like personal income And past spending being this weird and it majority of it being people spending it on food Serves it shouldn't be food services and pharmacies because it's just It's just sort of troubling And like especially with adoption of by now pay later.  Yeah, and I sort of kind of agree with that statement It's just we may get a flash crash who knows But at the same time it's very up in the air Uh Monthly, uh Yeah It's just like really up in there because four four data sets for something is very small. That's the thing Like this is very it's a very very small crashes this I mean if you're looking at sort of longer term Push down maybe maybe we have a crash basically we have crash We have crash vibes. Let's go Uh, I don't think we'll crash Uh just yeah, that's the thing I was just entering the year we're entering the first sort of quarter. I think this quarter sort of is a safe quarter I think next quarter we start worrying That's the thing. I don't think we worry just now. Maybe my timings might be off, but Hopefully it's not off this time. I hate when my timing is off by a couple of days But hopefully we start worrying about the issue next quarter and not this quarter so For now We saffle unsaffle for now And with that, I think I'll call it a day. Uh, I need to either get some sleep or get something. I don't know. Maybe some cocaine Economy yeah made of fully. Yes. Unlike the glass ceiling. It's a glass floor Big volatility Ah, that's not what fix traders are sort of saying. I mean if you look at, uh, you know I mean a big saying No, no, it's little bit big saying little bit Actually, but every time we've come down to these low areas Plus you get volatility next couple of days. So who knows these little bit might become big volatility. Who know who know Sorry, that's a terrible action. I should I should retire I mean, how low can we go? That's that's the Next week look fun Next week sure does look fun when has Hasn't the last couple months ever been fun? That's the thing. Like the markets have been fun period Not for everyone, but they've been fun Uh, yeah, I mean, maybe you can expect to crash but As soon as we get that volatility take then Yeah, we've got that confirmed Uh, but generally yeah again, we're down at these low areas Of volatility where we're sure we get walled to die down But as soon as we get we get comfortable here it sort of bounces back So it's something you might want to yeah Start start having some fear in you, but then again fear also leads to perfect buying opportunities You can always buy in small batches and that's why That's why I don't get some people don't do that.  I mean This is doing you no favours and saying, okay, we go up slamming this a bit higher Uh, again, it's just I don't know. It doesn't feel like down vibes. Just Purely based on this at least if it does go down from here, it will need to go up first. That's all I'm saying You're at least looking for it to go up here. If it gets caught here So be it that's that's your ceiling. If it doesn't get caught here You're you're heading up into these areas then probably going down So again, it's another case of going higher to go lower straight down Only down that down Okay, I think I'm gonna end it here. I'm running close to sort of my time anyway and then The other people need to sort of prepare for that Do you have you have someone on next after me? I don't I don't know who you tend to know But you got someone covering it so you can bug them with your questions if you want to If you want to watch a stream while you trade Uh And annoy them with rick and stuff Because you guys want enough Okay, I'll see you guys Monday hopefully you guys enjoy No one Yeah, I'll see you guys Next week. Hopefully you guys have a lovely day Make sure to straight safe Watch out for 10 10 15 other than that nothing sort of too major in terms of timings Hopefully you guys know you what you guys are doing and hopefully you guys know what to expect out today Other than that I will catch you guys on the next stream. Peace


Hello and welcome to the session. In this session we are going to discuss the following question and the question says that air is escaping from a spherical balloon at 2 cubic centimeters per minute. At what rate is the surface area shrinking when the radius is 1 centimeter? We are given a spherical balloon. Let us make a sphere that represents the spherical balloon. We are given that air is escaping from the spherical balloon at a rate of 2 cubic centimeters per minute. It means volume of sphere is decreasing at a rate of 2 cubic centimeters per minute. Let volume is decreasing with respect to time t. Let V be the volume of the spherical balloon. Then dV by dt is equal to minus 2. We put a negative sign in the rate of change of volume V because the volume is decreasing. Let R be the radius of the spherical balloon. Now we have to find at what rate is the surface area shrinking when the radius is 1 centimeter. Let S be the surface area of the spherical balloon. Then we have to find dS by dt when R is equal to 1 centimeter. Now we know that surface area of a sphere is equal to 4 pi R square. That implies S is equal to 4 pi R square. Differentiate both sides with respect to t. We get dS by dt is equal to d by dt of 4 pi R square. This implies dS by dt is equal to 4 pi into 2R dr by dt which implies dS by dt is equal to 8 pi R dr by dt. Name this equation as 1. Now we need to find the value of dr by dt. We have dV by dt is equal to minus 2. Also we know that volume of a sphere is equal to 4 by 3 pi R cube. Differentiating both sides with respect to t. We get dV by dt is equal to 4 by 3 pi into 3R square dr by dt. That is dV by dt is equal to 4 pi R square dr by dt. Now we put dV by dt is equal to minus 2 in this equation. So this equation becomes minus 2 is equal to 4 pi R square dr by dt. Which implies minus 2 upon 4 pi R square is equal to dr by dt. That is dr by dt is equal to minus 1 upon 2 pi R square. So now put this value in equation 1 which is dS by dt equal to 8 pi R dr by dt. This implies dS by dt will be equal to 8 pi R into minus 1 upon 2 pi R square. Which is equal to minus 4 by R. So dS by dt is equal to minus 4 by R. And we have to find dS by dt when R is equal to 1 centimeter. So when we put R equal to 1 centimeter we obtain dS by dt is equal to minus 4 upon 1 which is equal to minus 4. This implies surface area of the spherical balloon is decreasing at a rate of 4 square centimeters per minute. This is the required answer. This completes our session. Hope you enjoyed this session.


I'm Sarah Rubinstein and I'm one of the pediatric neurologists here at Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital. As a pediatric neurologist, probably some of the most common conditions that I see and conditions that I treat are seizures or headaches, developmental delays, ADHD, head trauma and concussions. So I really see a broad range of pediatric neurology. One of the reasons that I chose medicine as a field is because I really value the relationship between physicians and patients. And one of the reasons I chose pediatric neurology is because often we see our patients for many years and we really get to develop a very close relationship with our patients. I know as a pediatric neurologist that oftentimes patients are coming to us with in difficult situations or to receive difficult diagnoses. It can be challenging at times, but I think it's also rewarding to be in that position to provide care and comfort to the families. I really want to make sure that the patient and their family feel that they're being heard, being listened to, that all their needs are being addressed and that they're well taken care of, helping children. That's the most important thing for me.


Welcome to Sportsman Tech Talk. My name is Jim Isaac. Today we'll be going over the pinned feature in the Garment Update. So you'll notice you have a pinned icon down here in the corner. This basically is like a favorites icon. So all you're going to do is you just find the icons that you use most. Like I use nav charts, radar, vessel, sonar, things like that. So I'm just going to hold the icon down, pinned, hit OK, go to one of the other ones you want. I hit OK, I'll go to my vessel. So then basically at the bottom down here it's going to show a little left or right arrow and you can just scroll between your items. So it makes it super quick, very easy to get to. It's like a speed function just to get between your things. If you want a full screen and you don't want to break them up, very easy because you'll find yourself only using a couple of these screens at a time and this just makes it quick so you can go right through there and not have to go through all the other menu options. Alright and lastly if you want to remove anything from the pinned function to change it out with something else, just go back to your home, go to the pinned function here. All you're going to do is tap it again. It'll say un-pinned nav chart, yes. It removes it from your list and then you can just add another function or take another one away and that pretty much wraps up the pinned function. If you have any questions just leave them in the comments below.


But a very good afternoon to you. Warm welcome to people in the room and to those who are watching on the stream. The issue we're talking about now is responding to the great resignation. Now, that, of course, assumes that there was a great resignation to start with. And I'm going to be presumptuous and believe that some of the panel may even challenge that very question. And they were told that over four million people were quitting their jobs in the United States every month at the end of last year. And that was more than ever before. Well, they were all quitting their jobs. What were they doing and where were they going and why? And even if it did happen, how do policymakers and companies respond? Well, we have a perfect panel to discuss this and we'll be taking some questions from you in the room as we work our way through. It's not the most... Do forgive me. Nice to have you with us. We have Sharon Murrow, the General Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation. Sharon, it is good to have you here. Alan Dehaze is the Chief Executive Officer of the Odeco Group. Nice to have you. Levan Kaguaralu is the Chief Executive Officer of Cork Holdings from Turkey, sir. You're most welcome. And the Governor of Maryland from the US, Governor Hogan. It is nice to have you, sir. Thank you. The great resignation. First of all, do you accept that there was a great resignation? No. I think it's a myth. Because if you look at the US Bureau of Statistics, then what it shows is people actually did swap jobs. There's no doubt about that. In the US, you didn't do what Europe did or Australia did because millions of people lost their jobs overnight within a day or two of COVID, whereas the arrangements with social protection, with short-term working hours, et cetera, kept people in jobs in other countries. But the theory was, I think the idea underlying the great resignation is that either people had had enough, or they wanted to do something else, or they were going to move somewhere else.  Well, that's a really good theory that I could buy into. But actually, what really was happening is, if you look at pre-pandemic, you had 4% transfer of jobs. It went up in leisure and hospitality and retail, I think, with the three big sectors, by about 2%. Now, that's because people were offered a higher wage or a little more security. And that's fair enough. People do change jobs. I admit that there's a lot of job... There's a lot of tension and dissatisfaction. But I don't think you can say it's a great resignation, except potentially in the tech sector and the high-level paying jobs. So, it's a myth. Do you agree? As a matter of fact, there was an article on Harvard Business Review in March arguing that this was a linear trend starting in 2009. And because of the COVID, in 2020, there was a decline. And in 2021, it was a catch-up on the previous year. And the picture is different in different markets, including the emerging markets, where the job security is more... much more concerned. So, within your company, did you notice people leaving, changing, moving? In our company, where we have 110,000 colleagues, it has not been the case. As a matter of fact, in the last seven years, the voluntary leave ratio has declined. Although we have seen some of our colleagues leaving, especially in the IT sector... Are they leaving to go to other jobs? Are they leaving because they've been poached by other employers? They have been poached by other employees from companies in Europe, in the US, because they are being offered much higher salaries in those countries. That is the reason. And that's a problem for you? That is not a big problem at the moment. But it may become a problem for us. Well, so far, two people say that the very purpose of our discussion is irrelevant. So, I hope the coffee bar is still on. And you are looking at me to solve this. And as a good Belgium guy, I will say yes and no. No, there is no resignation. No, there is no resignation, because otherwise we won't have any workers anymore if everybody would resign. But there is great revelation. What do I mean with this? Because of the COVID, people have been away from the office. They have continued to work in a different way. They have continued to be very productive. And two years after, their employers have said, yeah, but you have to come back. And they have said, I have to come back. I have to come back in big cities. I have to commute again and so on. I don't want to do this. And as a consequence of this, they have started to re-evaluate their life.  If pre-pandemic, we had about 10% of the jobs opening, which were allowed to be performed away from the office. Past pandemic, we were above 70% of the jobs being able to perform in a remote way. And this has changed dramatically. And employers were not allowing that kind of work pattern. They have lost their employees. So that's why this great revelation. The revaluation, Governor, I mean, it's slightly more difficult in the state sector, in a sense, in the public sector, to do that. But we'll come onto policies that you might introduce. But if you just look at your state employees that you have, did you see any shifts and changes? Well, first of all, I would agree with my friend from Belgium saying yes and no. We had some people, I think, that re-evaluated what they wanted to do for a living during the 28 months that we've been going through COVID. Maybe re-evaluated what type of job they wanted to have. And we've been focused on a couple of things. One, with our state government employees, we were having difficulty filling all of the jobs. We did have some folks leave and go into higher-paying private sector jobs. We initiated an effort where we took about 20,000 of our state government jobs. And we lowered the requirements. We let them transfer. Instead of requiring a four-year degree, we allowed for people that had comparable work experience or served in the military or had other real-world real-life experience. So we enabled a whole lot of new people to now be able to apply. They were perfectly capable of doing the jobs. They were just being excluded. Now, did you do that because there was a necessity? You couldn't fill the jobs. There was a necessity being the mother of invention. You had to change the criteria. Well, it's a little bit of both. So we were growing jobs at twice the rate of the rest of the country. Unemployment is down. Our state government jobs, it was not that big of an issue, but a big portion of our workforce. We have the highest median household income in America and the most highly educated workforce. But we also have a huge chunk of folks that were kind of being left on the sideline. And so we wanted to try to provide opportunities for them, both in state government and to try to set an example for the private sector to say maybe you should consider the requirements that you have for some of the positions you're trying to fill. We've got a fair number of people in the room. Has anybody changed job in the last 12 months? Yes, ma'am. You've changed jobs by your own choice. You resigned from one and you went off to the next. Yes, I did. Excellent. And behind you, the gentleman there. Same. I changed jobs. I resigned from one and went to the next. I mean, it's not a personal question, which it is a personal question. What was the motivation for resigning to go? I'll rephrase that in case it might be other part of it. Was it because quality of life, other issues like that? No. No, my tenure was over in one job. It was actually two years passed over. I was in her way and I left. Anyone on this side change jobs? Yes, tell us. A shout. I changed jobs 10 and a half months ago and a small part of my rationale was related to the fact that my former employer wanted people back in the office with a higher degree of regularity and my current employer is a virtual first environment. That was not the only reason, but that was a small part of the reason. I won't call anybody to justify it, but has anybody considered changing jobs? LAUGHTER When's your term up, Governor? I think others might have a view on that. In January, I'm going to be part of the great resignation. My term will come to an end. At the end of June, I will make a great revelation. And at the end of November, I'm stepping down from my current job. LAUGHTER So essentially, we have a panel on a discussion that doesn't exist with people who won't be in work. LAUGHTER Well, no, in different work. Hopefully we'll find a job. Can I break the myth, the second part of the myth here? There are jobs, including many of my own staff, who do have the luxury to have some, you know, working from home with technology, et cetera. Not entirely, because they represent workers globally, so they have to go to where the workers are or where the negotiations are. But that's a luxury.  It's in factories that kept us going. In the health environment, in teaching, yes, for a while, but in fact, the parents in my staff thought teachers were heroes by the end of the time, because they wanted to get their kids back to school. But as the general secretary of a trade union confederation, is this turnover for whatever reason? Is this beneficial because employers have to do more to attract staff. They have to work harder to do that. Yeah, I mean, we can use it. There's no doubt about that. I was saying to the governor that wages in his state, not quite 15, but they're 12, 50 or something, minimum wages. But when I looked at the statistics, people actually, there's a lot of exemptions. A lot of them are paid lower wages in hospitality, in retail, in leisure, in other areas where you have to be present. And they're moving. PricewaterhouseCoopers figures actually are enlightening because they say that there was less job-swapping even last year than previously. And I think that is about security. But also, remember, you had, I don't know, the American market had an extraordinary loss of workers to the labour market. Majority of them women, because women couldn't afford childcare. They actually now are really feeling the pinch financially. But going back to work is a cost-benefit calculation. Look, I think we've been focused on this issue for the eight years that I've been Governor of Maryland, and it's really about kind of upskilling and re-skilling workers and trying to train them for the jobs of the future and allow them to earn higher income. So we have a number of different programs. We have P-TECH, where we focus on STEM. We let them get a two-year AA degree at the same time they get their high school diploma. They get paid summer internships and mentorships and first in line for jobs when they come out. We've got a program we started called the Earn Grant Program. It's nationally recognized where we will pay for with grants. The private sector designs the training that they need for the skilled jobs that they have. And we do this but the state will pay for this to help. We don't want to train workers for the jobs that there's no market for. We want to train them for these very specific skills that all of you in the private sector need. And we've added 60 different new apprenticeships including not just the traditional thing like the trades, but in things like cyber security, where we have we're the cyber capital of America, home to the NSA and the U.S. cyber command. We have 17 colleges and universities of cyber excellence, but we're re-skilling and we didn't actually get a college degree that are coming out and making $100,000 a year. So, you know, trying to provide for the jobs of the future, the government does have a really big role to play in partnership with the private sector too. But the number one problem we hear from every industry is we don't it's not a question of people leaving their jobs, it's a question we don't have enough skilled labor to do what we need to do. But the U.S. is having to do quite a lot of work. They're doing a lot of catch-up to Maryland, you mean. They are. Perhaps a few thoughts about it, because it's also about, again, this revolution. You have a lot of people having left a company and an industry because this industry was eventually low paid, heavy duty, you had to work during the weekend, in the shift, during the night and so on. And during the weekend, they had to start new type of jobs and they have left. They have left the hospitality, for example. Now, the question is do the employers have to work harder, not really harder, but for sure they have to reinvent themselves and reinvent their business. And so that's why you see a lot of restaurants saying okay, we open earlier, but we finish also earlier so that people can have at least a normal life, a normal night. People can have their weekend and so they reinvent themselves also to offer a better life for the people. Sir. Of course, we need to take some measures, but as the group, we have always adapted a long-term perspective, including this one. Our main strength comes from our values, core values which have been embedded in our corporate culture, including putting the people first. That means from the job protection point of view, we have always stood by our colleagues, our people, even during very difficult times, including the COVID period. And having said that, job security is not enough. New generations have different expectations. They want to put a positive impact in the societies they live in. They want to make a change for the better. So they want to be empowered and included. In order for us to enable them to do so, we have had to adapt new methods. Tell me what you've adapted because we're talking here about a sort of a late, Gen Z or late Gen X workforce, which I don't think there's anybody in the room who might be Gen Z. But we're talking about a workforce that requires that. What are you amending? First of all, they want flexibility. They want flexibility in time and place as we have discussed. They don't like hierarchical structures. So we have decided to adapt this agile working model which is quite instrumental to remove hierarchical structures and empower our colleagues. We have also adapted new personalized hybrid working schemes for our colleagues. We have now built 35 collective office spaces where they can work when they need to come to work physically. And we are planning to increase it up to 100 units. Therefore, in addition to complement this, we have had to adapt a new performance system which provides transparency of the company objectives also the goals of the top management. Alain, maybe we can go work for him. Please. Absolutely, but I'm so pleased with all purpose. And I think that everything is starting with the purpose and young people, especially the Gen Z, they are looking for strong purpose allowing them to have impact to make impact into the society. I take the old example to make the future work for everyone. Everybody wants to make the future work for everyone. And it starts by having this purpose and then, yes, you have the different benefits, flexibility because it is very important, but you have to demonstrate with real facts how you embody your purpose so that people are willing to join you and stay with you. But let me take you to Nigeria, Tunisia, you know, India, pick a country, Indonesia, the young Gen Z, in fact anybody that's younger than us is still actually pretty desperate for job security for a labour market place where they can feel like, they can feed their families, live with their family, you know. That's merely a point that one size doesn't fit all. The policies have to account for those markets that are less developed and have more basic jobs and decent work. Versus those in the developed world where there are more higher, if you like, at the scale it requires. It might mean that the companies with the luxury to do good in the world actually put in place human and labour rights in their supply chains. But maybe mandated due diligence, Richard. The one doesn't prevent the other. I think, strong purpose, yes I know, security and flexibility. And we are advocates of combining flexibility which is requested by the young generation. They want to have the possibility to move on very regularly, but they want security. And so it's up to us and especially I'm looking at the policy makers to organize this combination of security and flexibility both on the individual side but also for the companies, for the business to be allowed to do that. As a policy maker how do you balance the legislative or regulatory environment between job security and the freedom of the workforce and the availability of the workforce? What's the freedom of the workforce and freedom for the private sector companies they get to make these decisions for themselves. So you want to set policies that help people get the skills and get the jobs that they want and have a purpose and to have the flexibility and all the things that this generation is looking for without being dictating to companies what they have to do. Because I think, look, this was going to happen anyway. It's been accelerated because of COVID and different industries are impacted. We were talking about the service industry. You can't do that remotely. There's certainly a lot of things in IT where you don't have to ever come to work. You can do everything remotely. Somewhere in between I think in the service industries like in law firms or financial services I think younger people who are not working in the office are losing that mentorship of the older generation that aren't Gen Z that can pass on to them by working together in an office. I think we all have to figure out in each industry and each sector and each level of income how we're going to go about this new world of work. But listening to what Levent was saying about, how old is your company? In 40 years we will be celebrating our Centennial. Oh, we're all invited to the party. Excellent. So you're 100 years old and it's a family, it's one of the largest companies in Turkey listed but family listed.  The image I always have is our parents disco dancing until one realises that's now us at a certain age. So how easy was it for you to make that adjustment? First of all let me say that a publicly listed company but family controlled gives me the comfort to maintain this long-term perspective. I have never been under short-term performance pressure at all. That's why during difficult times I have the luxury of making these tough decisions and I have to say that when we make the tough decisions in turn our colleagues act in solidarity with their companies when we need their support. This has been part of our cultural transformation journey all what we have done. It is our responsibility as the management of this wonderful group which I'm very proud of working for to prepare this group for the next century. In order for us to do that we have been running a transformation programme and the main pillars of this programme are digital transformation zero-based approach, innovation corporate entrepreneurship agile working carbon transition and people development. This is part of this big overarching transformational programme. What's the one thing that people want that people have told you because you've already got thousands of employees yourself but you've got 2 million people that you place so what is the one thing besides a decent salary? The one thing is impact. Good question. Every time we are meeting, interviewing people and we are asking them and I speak about the Gen Z what do you want? I want to have impact and you have to help them to answer the question what kind of impact the opportunity and the possibility to have first a small impact and then a bigger impact and so on but the key question they have and the key ambition they have is making and having impact. I do wonder perhaps somewhat more controversial when we all started in our careers you knew it was more than five days a week that you'd be working you knew that it would be long hours going to climb to the top of the greasy pole in any profession you knew that this was going to require a commitment and level of dedication and certainly in politics it's not nine to five. No it's not nine to five. I spend my whole life in the private sector as an entrepreneur starting and founding and running small businesses and talk about wanting a purpose I left 40 years in private sector and now I'm ever to run for office because I was searching for a purpose how I could make a difference for the people in my state and I work seven days a week but I'm passionate about what I do and I love my job and I think that really is what everyone wants. We've talked a lot about Gen Z but that's only a portion of the issue we have folks at middle age and older who need to get re-skilled because they still want to contribute like me I didn't have any skills to be governor but I learned on the job and you got re-elected so clearly the voters thought you might have had some skills now we are coming from a total different background I think 30-35 years ago when we started to work where I was coming from it was about earning money being able to pay my apartment my cars in an autonomous way and so on this generation is coming from a total different environment the world of the junior reporter when I started as a junior reporter the idea of wondering that you hadn't had a weekend off now I'm not saying it's right Sharon because I can feel you bristling absolutely I'm not saying this right but I hear some of the questions or the issues now and I think how things have changed absolutely the environment has changed career is not anymore the top of my priority I want for sure to live in a secure environment and so on but I don't want to give anymore everything for my professional career I want a balance the vast majority of the people wants a balance between private purpose and professional purpose and they are not ready to any compromise but I think you're talking about a particular work culture my father was a builder he went to work at 7 o'clock in the morning he was home at 4 o'clock in the afternoon religious every day of his life you know he would then go out and do things in the community my brother worked for a public sector he went to work every day came home every day at the same time that's the bulk of the workforce I'm sorry but it is and the number one convention the number one convention at the ILO in terms of global rights the good old 8 hours now when we re-evaluated the future of work in 2019 and negotiated with employers and with governments they said irrespective of the employment arrangements because we are seeing a terrible breakdown in the employment contract 60% informal work total exploitation desperation in many countries no social protection, no minimum wages no rule of law no security so yes they want a decent wage but I'd say the one thing they want is job security so they can do what you just said pay their rent invest in a car if that's what they want raise a family so I don't think we should romanticise the difference between some professions absolutely acknowledge that and the bulk of the world of work right but has the bulk of the world of work changed? the great resignation is those privileged ones who enjoy the luxury no I don't think that's true either you have to separate the luxury of saying I'm going to negotiate to work from home for three days or five days yes we all have employees and many of ourselves who make that choice but if you walk the world I walk in the global workforce then the overwhelming number of people work a set number of hours in a set location half the world is even connected to the internet when you want to talk about remote working so I just think in a world that wants to be global where companies have supply chains you have to understand the whole of the workforce and not just this bit as much as I'm not saying we shouldn't actually manage it well I have no figures but I think that the profile of the workforce has changed and probably 40 years ago we should look at the figures but you have many more people having the type of working life you are describing on-premise very regulated quite many more manufacturing jobs and so on and through the years we have automated a lot we have created a lot of new jobs so it means that today when you look at the global workforce 50% needs to be on-premise but 50% are the so-called knowledge workers 50% and those 50% they have order expectations today then they could have 30 years ago so you are talking about that 50% on the knowledge based workforce to that extent where do you draw the line Levant where will you move no further in terms of I'll do flexible working I'll do this I'll do that but at what point do you say enough you want to work for us these are the criteria that you've got to follow as a matter of fact we talked about the purpose I believe that the core values and the clear corporate strategy could provide the sense of purpose to entire workforce including the colleagues who are at the shop floor operating the machines having said that what we are doing has not been forced by our employees or other forces to do from our core we put our people the first therefore it is we believe that they are the ones who make us successful therefore I mean this is a dynamic relationship I cannot tell you that this is the limit we cannot go beyond to your previous question what was the trigger maybe to make these type of changes it was the COVID environment I have to tell you before COVID we had thought about remote working more flexible working but we had the courage to do so having gone through that period we saw that it was possible it is possible and we can test the limits of that and we saw the results we haven't lost any efficiency operational efficiency by remote working and we have the tools developed to measure the performances therefore I mean this is a dynamic situation I don't want to say any boundaries that we have in our mind I believe that whenever we need the support of each other from the colleagues from us as the manager they will be there we will be there to support them that is the main idea going forward let's hear from anybody in the room on this subject that was quick right in front of me let's see who is going to want to speak lady over there lady over there behind me we will start with you thank you very much I am Luisa I work for BVDA a bank and obviously we have felt the same issues as you have been describing my question is on the longer term because we have installed a hybrid model that has been formalized labour wise it is a 6040 model very flexible in terms of how you can take it my question is 6040 on-prem there is obviously flexibility around that because it affects labour contracts especially in Spain that has to be the rule let's say so my point is I feel sometimes that we are stuck between a rock and a hard place in the sense that remoteness creates less engagement overall what happens is aren't we going to a place where people are more disengaged overall from the culture the values because they don't live it and because they don't live it they are going to be more volatile and move around more so isn't this a catch 22 we will talk about that because what I found during the pandemic is the more junior staff were the first ones to want to work from home because it was such a great new Jim Jams but as it went on longer and longer they realised they were the ones that were most at risk the senior staff were speaking to we had known each other for 20 years we were speaking to each other every day all the day on that but the junior staff were not hearing the projects they weren't getting water cooler time just by seeing that or popping into somebody's office or they felt disengaged and they were the ones who wanted to come back into the office but not all the time so how do you balance that Governor how do you balance what we're saying the need to come in with the risk of disengagement well it's a really difficult question and as you said it's a catch 22 I think it really is and I think the people who suffer the most of the younger workers I mentioned that earlier where I said they're not getting the mentorship they're working for a long time and you don't have that there's a difference between being on a computer and interacting in a personal way together in the same office so with our workers in the state government there's really different people that do different types of jobs and some of them have to be there to do their job it's like they're fixing a road they're building something they have to be engaged some customer service answering phones helping people with problems and steering them they can do it remotely but they still are not getting the interaction and so with people at higher levels they're all interacting every day and making big decisions and it may be those folks in the middle that are really getting squeezed a little bit because they're being remote and they thought it was going to be good for them but they're starting to find that it's actually hurting them can I just take you on this because in our business it's the directors it's the producers it's the people who put the programs the camera and all that sort of people do you feel, in your case the road workers the people who do that do you feel the need to somehow in some way compensate either with greater leave or by finding some for the fact that they have to go to work versus other people who don't I mentioned this earlier what we've tried to do is give people a path upward and so the folks that were at this level are now making more money and we've back filled with people by saying you don't have to have a four year degree to do these jobs and we brought in new people who are excited to have those jobs and who are working hard and so it's been a win-win for both the people that have been with us a while and with the new folks that now have an opportunity Richard do you make it sound like the workplace is a terrible thing no I don't it's actually a place that most of us like to be colleagues and Spain actually moved very quickly to put legislation in place to protect workers and the dignity of decent work in that mix then if I've given that impression I didn't mean to I was intending to point out again if I think of our industry mine is we ended up giving a bonus to those producers who throughout the pandemic had to come into the office because you have to keep the program on air and it was a way of recognising that there were people who didn't have a choice nobody gave the nurses or the retail workers or the truck drivers bonus but that's not a reason but with great respect Sharon that is not a reason not to do it where you can no no and I totally agree with that you know I do but I actually do think we need to also know the nature if you put people first you know the nature of the job and people tell you that they're engaged that they want to be working in this way that's fine work it out but don't think that we know what people want because mental health's gone through the roof in terms of risk you know some people have now got eye conditions the blue light other people you know are actually risking hearing we'll take a question Hi my name is Salome I'm a global shaper and I'm a millennial so I work for university so I also with like the Gen Z so I wanted to comment on what Sharon said earlier about developing countries not also wanting the flexibility and the rest because they are more into job security so the truth is they are already having a cap of how long they are going to sacrifice that flexibility to save and still want what you would call the developed countries want the flexibility and agility so still regardless if they are in developed or developing they are still wanting what they want which is as you said passion, impact doing so many things in the world so yeah I wanted to make comments on that Gentleman behind Hi my name is Pranav Sia of EI Mindspark I find that a lot of the employees today want to work less but want continuously higher increases in pay and they're also the competition that's just poaching them how does one sort of balance out the need for creating value first before capturing it from an employee lens they want the work life balance but they also want a 20% pay and as a business it's hard But that's entirely reasonable If you're an employee you only have one thing to sell which is you and if you can sell that for 20% more and still get satisfaction running a profitable business Oh, good point The lady next to you I think I'm Penny Noss I'm with UPS So, a question I wanted to ask was about roles of leaders and managers because what we're talking about so far is the workers but when you're talking about disengagement when you're talking about things one of the things that we've seen is during the crisis that locational bias of the headquarters was lessened because you had to work globally with everybody and everybody's square was the same size and so my question is is this a worker problem or is this a leader problem Sir, worker or leader problem I think this is a leader problem to make sure that all the workforce have been engaged in the common purpose and objectives so when it comes to changing role of the leaders what the pandemic have strengthened the need for the leaders to be close to the colleagues as much as they can they need to improve their communication coordination skills especially for the ones who are working remotely and there are tools if we have time regretfully we don't but we'll continue I'm André Guam an oncologist in the US running a large multi center cancer program and we all obviously dealt with COVID you talk about nurses, thank you for mentioning them because in this post-COVID environment they're the one who saved the world and they very often say that we went from heroes to zeros, well you heard that multiple times sure there are a lot of nurses who have had a high during the peak of the pandemic over 3500 nurses over 4000 actually nurses from these traveling nurses from agencies that are much higher cost and actually we have employees that are leaving departments working temporarily for these companies and coming back in the same department with a salary that is almost double so this is really difficult to manage as a hospital and I would like to get into healthcare where it's an industry that doesn't have a huge margin under pressure post-COVID recovery and how we keep this stuff in healthcare setting it's a really important and difficult question hard to answer I don't have a real easy one for you but I agree that the nurses were the healthcare heroes throughout the pandemic and our state had one of the best health responses to the pandemic of any place in America and I was leading the National Governors Association as the governors were leading through that I tell you that the nurses were doing an incredible job the whole healthcare system stepped up and we owe them a tremendous debt of gratitude but we were seeing you know there were as the pandemic went regionally from one place to another there were places that desperately needed nurses and they were willing to pay huge amounts of money to get visiting nurses and they were in some cases doubling their pay so we were having an exodus of nurses leaving it got to the point in our state where we have a huge very great healthcare system we had people from Johns Hopkins across the street from the University of Maryland Medical System they would move across the street to get more money so we had this people just transferring all over the place it was like the highest bidder and on the one hand the nurses were desperately needed and paying them more was something you had to do but the margins are very slim and they were actually competing against each other the hospital systems but we need to invest much more in care if the global health shop did nothing else it exposed the under industry in care globally and if we don't pay attention that it is health it is education it's childcare it's aged care it's all of those things if you want to keep people in the labour force you've got to provide healthcare but you also have to provide those other areas of care but the solution is bargain for higher wages you know nurses have been underpaid in many countries forever I used to bargain for nurses alongside their union in Australia and I can tell you the skills levels for those nurses are extraordinary they could actually earn money right up to nurse practitioner just below a doctor doctors didn't particularly like it but there are solutions for careers that make people want to stay and I think it's time we evaluated who we are actually valuing and what we are paying them and I just say can I just say to the young woman over here that I'm talking about the jobs availability because young people in Tunisia right now are again you know on the streets because they can't get jobs you know in many parts of the world they can't get jobs so it isn't about the luxury of exactly what you say I'm not suggesting for a minute they don't have the same value set but the first priority is to get a job to get a job that pays them decently and it has some security as we come to the end because I can see we are just about out my last... I would like to say to this young great woman don't bargain security for flexibility but leapfrog that's also the opportunity you have and you should claim for more flexibility and to realise your dream to have impact and so on and at the same time invent a way to also have security and there are ways to do it it's just that society and policy and regulation have to be reinvented according to the need of the current society finally you're talking of the great re-evaluation right you said re-evaluation so to the panel finally how have you re-evaluated your own life and what are you going to do differently what has your re-evaluation led you to conclude about your own life sir I have realised that I have been working very hard personally I am trying to balance my life again but we have seen that even during very difficult times we have to keep our hopes alive that's my lesson Sharon what have you re-evaluated I think we've got no no but me and my role have gone back to basics we have to fight and that means me but it means all of you for full employment and social protection that's at the heart of trust in our future now the way we work is a different story what are you going to do differently what are you going to do what are you going to do what am I going to do I tell you what I'm going to do having done 21 years at CNN I'm entitled to a month's long service leave which I probably wouldn't have taken and now to hell with the lot of you I am off for the whole of July your re-evaluation my revelation is that my revelation I want to stay young and join the Gen Z generation and have impact in the new chapter of my life Governor are you going to put the sordid business of politics behind you well somebody's got to save politics so I'm going to continue to try to be a voice of reason and bipartisan cooperation but yeah I think I've learned from the younger people we're talking about I would love to have some work-life balance I took two days off and went to Davos that was my only to take care of I'll leave you with this thought the level of hypocrisy on work-life balance that you have heard today well I'll leave you to make your own judgements thank you


Okay, we're back, this is Dave Vellante and we are live here at EMC World 2012. This is day two of EMC World. This is our third EMC World with theCUBE. We were here all day Monday, it was a cloud day. Today is all about value, extracting value from data, which is really the business transformation that we're seeing and EMC is really pushing out some great marketing and we're here with Richard Snee who's the event chairman of the Data Science Summit and former CMO of Green Plum. Welcome Richard, good to see you back here. Today is great to see you, thanks for having me. I have to give you a lot of credit because I was saying today earlier, marketing's changing, it has to become a source of value and that's really what the Data Science Summit is all about, it's great marketing but you're not there selling people, you're not taking orders for Green Plum, you're delivering value to a community. Tim O'Reilly likes to say, create more value than you extract and that's sort of the philosophy that you're taking here, isn't it? It really is and it's a testament really to EMC and Green Plum to make that investment in the people and in the growing community of Data Science and last year, I don't know if you recall, we kicked it off, right? And what was interesting, we made a subtle change but it's an important one, last year it was about celebrating the data scientist and you guys at the time did this amazing infographic about the characteristics of a data scientist and so that event was about that individual and that individual being the rock star in the big data era but a year later, what's interesting, it's about a Data Science team. What we've learned is that that rock star might be at the core but it really is about the team built around that data scientist and so thematically for us, it's an expansion of all of the people involved ranging from BI professionals to CIS admin to you name it, there's a continuum of people that really need to be involved in this process. You know, it's subtle, the reason I was peaking there is because in my head was data scientist and I said, I think Richard said data science, so that is a subtle change and an important one because it is a team sport. It is, it absolutely is a team sport. Speaking of team sport, we have Jeremy Howard from Kaggle with us. Yeah, Kaggle is, who's been on. Yeah, and if I could, if you'd indulge me, I'd like to talk about some of the really amazing people we have. Yeah, that's really what we'd like to do in this segment is talk about that and sort of memorialize what's going to happen here. Right, so, and I brought some notes, so I don't miss anybody. But I think importantly for me, it's kind of framing it with powerful, inspiring keynote speakers and we're kicking the program off tomorrow with Nate Silver of 458.com and his fame, of course, comes from predictions around the 2008 elections. But he has a really rich history about starting on the sport side, kind of moneyball starting out that way to his political predictions and so he's both a practitioner and a wonderful writer. He's working on a book now, he's going to share some of that early with us at the data science, but it's really about the perils of predictive analytics and what can go right and what can go wrong. So we're thrilled about that. We're going to close the summit with the same gentleman that we had last year, Jonathan Harris. Jonathan is an artist, programmer, and storyteller and we got such amazing response from a technical community about someone talking about the emotional or human aspect of all that we're doing here around data. So we brought him back. So that's kind of how we're bookending the summit but in between, we're thrilled. We have the editor of Time International, Jim Frederick, that's going to moderate a panel for us and he's going to moderate a panel on social data and as you know, that is a huge topic about, first of all, what is it, right? Is it data that people contribute knowingly or unknowingly and what is it that we're all doing with that? And how do I find the value that's in that exhaust fume, you know? Right, that's a great, you know, more and more I'm hearing that term exhaust, whether it's mobile exhaust, data exhaust and there's all kinds of opportunities and issues as we're finding with all of this stuff and so we also have a great representation from academia. Like we have professors here from Columbia, Berkeley, Stanford, you're really talking about the movement and it's something that is really connected to kind of the spirit and the investment that EMC is making in the training program for data science and so we have a great panel being led by one of, I call him, he's a member of the Big Data Rat Pack, that's Mike Driscoll, right? He's now CEO of MetaMarkets and so he'll be there leading that panel and we just have an amazing cast of characters for this summit, so we're thrilled.  Right, so we had 300 and last year and we had about, I think 150 solid data science practitioners. Half the audience was real data science practitioners. Then we had some line of business and we had some support people there and of course our team, our employees, this year it's twice as big. So we're approaching about 600 as far as registered attendees and just shows the nature of the growth one year later. So we're thrilled about that. Yeah, now so again, that subtle change from data scientist to data science, expanding the team, which involves a lot of different, I would think business people, technical people and so forth and maybe even the traditional BI folks, you know? I presume you're welcoming them into this team, right? Absolutely, we have this wonderful speaker, her name is Pianca Jane and her company is called ARING, A-R-Y-N-G and she's former predictive analytics specialist and expert at PayPal, but she has this consulting firm. Her keynote is specifically about the path from business intelligence to data science, right? Because it really is this kind of, it's a journey, you know, we talk about journey quite a bit, right? Journey to the cloud, journey to big data.  And so we're thrilled to be able to bring them along, we're finding that in addition to the core experts, the leading data scientists, there are a lot of aspirational data scientists that want to know what is my path, what's my next step? And so we're supporting them as well. Richard, what's the format like? So again, you hosted it last year. I did, yeah. You hosted it again this year. And then, so describe the day. So the day starts out, we have a keynote.  We then break to a panel, and as I said, Jim Frederick, editor of Time International, former managing editor of time.com, he's got a data sense that's really fantastic. He is moderating this panel of some heavy hitters, right? So Nathan Wolf of GVFI, Andreas Weigand of the social data lab, right? You know, Andreas. Infrastructure is irrelevant to Andreas Weigand, yes. Right, exactly. So there's a panel structure, I mean, a panel after the keynote. And then we're moving to, we used this last year, I don't know if you remember, but we had a series where there were individuals with some lightning talks. So they take about 10 minutes. Right. And for this summit, it's really, those lightning talks, we have five amazing people, including an executive from Intuit, which is fantastic. Where they're going to take 10 minute lightning talks, and it really is under the hood. Like, what did you do? What tools did you use? What was the process that you used? What was not only the technical process, but what was the thought process you used to extract value to solve a problem, to answer a question? And we think that's going to be just, you know, amazing. What I loved about the lightning talks, Richard, is that, you know, when you get a talk like this, you can only absorb so much, right? And you're looking for ideas. That's why you come to conferences like this. You're looking for ideas and you want to meet people. You don't need to absorb everything there is to know, but I want to be able to take some takeaways and then you leave them wanting more, which is I thought, I thought you did a very good job of doing that, I don't know if it was on purpose, but it worked great, I thought, last year. Yeah, and it's interesting, we learned so much last year and you mentioned networking, right? We're very sensitive to, we saw some of that in action last year and we wanted to amplify that a bit. So there are great opportunities for people during lunch to, you know, birds of a feather. We have a great party planned, you know, tomorrow night where people will be able to get together and socialize and connect. And we think that's really, really important. Fantastic, all right, well listen, congratulations on the second year, I mean, it's really starting to explode. Where do you want to take this? Well, I have to say that I think, you know, EMC, Green Plum, really, really smart. This is what leaders do. They support the community, they connect with the community to help them better understand what kind of products and services they need. And I think that it will just be an ongoing thing that this community has a sense of loyalty now to the people that have brought them together and I think it will continue to go on and continue to grow and I'm excited about that.  It was a really high quality event and it's just, I would expect it's just going to keep growing and growing from here, so. Yeah, I hope so. Yeah, congratulations. Yeah, thanks so much. Thanks very much for taking the time. Thanks for having me. Coming on theCUBE, all right. I appreciate it. Okay, keep it right there. We'll be back in just a minute to wrap up day two from EMC World Live 2012 from Las Vegas, keep it right there.


What's going on everyone? Sam here with late in sports gardens ripping one box of 21 22 Panini Chronicles basketball for Vaughn So good luck here Vaughn. Let's see what we got buddy Maybe some sort of weird role player coming out of this auto for sure 100% 56 empty. Thanks Jacob appreciate you buddy. Eighth man auto for Vaughn exactly as Keon Johnson Steph Curry Nice Franz Wagner on the purple. I believe that is to 49 the magic Phoenix Lamello and Trayman. Okay, you want to drop your IG too? Tron will drop his IG too Both night not number. There's a Greg Brown to 149 for the Blazers. Scotty Barnes honors nice one there Orange is Io Dasunmu 44 out of 75 for the 75th anniversary orange wave nice one there Cade base rookie and Moses Moody Here's one. There's a Davion Mitchell timeless treasures two out of 99 for the Kings Nice one there. Congrats Vaughn Isaiah Jackson Of course they all brought up for some update Brandon Boston jr. If the Clippers and Jalen Suggs rookie Gabe Vincent auto. Oh, yeah Roy Hibbert CJ Watson something something's coming out of here for sure Mowgli rookie There's a Scotty Barnes to 99 on the playbook rookie Luca Auto is gonna be up. There you go five of ten gold Bobby Portis Hi, so in there on the airborne congrats Vaughn, that's a Vaughn card right there Potential um, what was I gonna say six man of the year though Himera Ross, I would say right now Donald Banton and Luca Donchich That's Oakley's on the court Bobby Portis right there. I would assume Yanis Ben Simmons update got a James book night five of 25 on the blue auto for the Hornets nice one there. He had a neat mere attention nightmare. Oh god. I forgot about that Aaron Wiggins and Josh Giddy the 149 Shones running on fumes here Scotty Barnes luminance update Josh Christopher to 99 Zaya Williams, I'll just soon move refractor Alfred Schengen and Kessler Edwards Do a free break there Vaughn? Congrats again on the hits as always my man. There's a very Vaughn card in there I have to say we'll get those right out to you buddy


Hello everybody. So nice to see you guys again. I'm going to show you exactly how it looks inside the quality assurance study guide. So if you are a dental hygienist who is taking the quality assurance exam and you don't know where to start how to study what to study. Guess what, I can help you. Sorry that was my puppy.  Princess. This is what happens when you work from home you guys. Look you have a toy play with that. Sorry guys. So if you guys look at my screen. Notice on the left hand side so you will see all the different topics I can zoom in for you guys. Can I zoom in there we go. So if you look on the left hand side you see all the different topics I give you everything you need to prepare for your quality assurance exam. I give you PowerPoints to read I give you PDF files and there's also a video after each topic where I kind of explain the topic to you I help you with studying and I go over the quiz answers and protocols because if you are sorry not protocols. I give you answers and rationals because if you guys notice on the left hand side where it says quiz under every topic. I don't think I can show you here because I didn't log in as a customer, I'm the admin here, but basically each quiz has questions it's an interactive so you can take the quiz and practice as many times as you want if it lets you know right away if you're right or wrong but then if you notice on the bottom of each topic here this cloud type icon. So that is a video where I go over the answers and the rationals I talked about here I'm just going to turn the sound off for a second, but I go through the answers the rationals, and I give you some study help so I have all of that for you. So let's look at the different topics so health and safety emergency community. We have infection control there's a lot about infection control pharmacology and the best part to is if you click on just under the topic title I'm going to do pharmacology. So I clicked on test details so I tell you what the percentages per topic how many questions, and that kind of helps you study a little bit to you're not going to spend, you know, 10 hours studying pharmacology every day for a month if it's only 7% of the exam right. You're not going to do that so I'd like to have that there for you, but look, all of the topics are here you don't have to purchase a textbook and nothing. I've done the hard work for you so this is the quality assurance study guide. It's a full course. I do go through the practice profile to so I talk a little bit about that to give you guys help. I even have a video. I kind of help you guys. I give you different practice profiles to kind of look at to so you have an idea of what's a good practice profile and what's not a good practice profile. And the best part is, if you feel like you have done your practice profile, and you don't know if it's if it's ready to be submitted you don't want to fail. Just send it to me so I do offer a full practice profile review as well where I will actually market for you. So I'm just going to show you guys that link here so the link is inside the course, but I can also leave it for you down below to where I do a full review for full help so I go over your entire practice profile, one line by one line I look through everything, everything. I send you a full report afterwards with what I feel you need to change in order to pass. You don't have to change anything if you don't want to, but even some things I'm going to highlight in red for you what you need to change and if you don't change them. So I'm going to get a call with the CDHO so it's a great help if you feel you need help with that. You have full access to the course to the quality assurance prep course until February 2022. So if you sign up now, don't worry, no rush you have until you have to take your exam so you have full access till February 2022 because if for some reason you haven't submitted it by by February 2022. You have an automatic fail but having that said, you have full full access to it until you don't need it anymore. Basically, so if you need more time just let me know and then you'll have full access to anyway so let me know you guys if you have any questions I am here to help. I'll leave the links for you down below for the quality assurance prep course. And the practice profile review I'm doing a lot of that now for the practice profiles it does take me a week or two at the most to review them so please be patient but if you need it sooner. My lip is itchy. Sorry guys if you need it sooner let me know. I can put a rush on it no extra charge, but I'm getting a lot this time of year so do it before the holidays because it's kind of nice to get it done right so I'll leave the links for you down below let me know if any questions, and I'll talk to you guys in the next video I will talk to you soon.


After learning the rules of debits and credits, some students wonder why accounting is backwards to real life. And this backwardness causes some confusion. Let me see if I can clear this up. Students who think the rules of debits and credits are backwards often refer to a banking example. In accounting cash is an asset and assets are increased with debits. In banking cash is decreased with a debit. The bank debits your account when you spend money. Let's recall that assets are increased with debits and liabilities are increased with credits. Your checking account is an asset to you. It has value and provides benefit into the future assuming your balance isn't overdrawn. But what is your checking account to your bank?  Let's look at the characteristics. It's something that they owe. If you go to your bank and demand your money, they will give it to you because they owe it to you.  Now let's see if the rules of debits and credits make sense when we think of your checking account from the bank's perspective. When you deposit money into your account, your bank credits your account. Your bank's liability to you has increased and liabilities increase with credits. When you take money out of your account or spend it, your bank debits your account. Your bank's liability to you has decreased and liabilities decrease with debits. So in summary, the rules of debits and credits aren't backwards. We just have to remind ourselves whose accounting are we doing, ours or the banks. I hope this short explanation helps you see that the rules of debits and credits aren't backwards and accounting for debits and credits are the same no matter what company or industry is doing it.