So, the next three examples that we are going to look at are all steady flow applications and the last example that we will look at involves a heat engine executing a cyclic process. So, the first example here reads like this air is compressed steadily in an 8 kilowatt compressor from ambient condition to 650 kPa and 187 degree Celsius. The mass flow rate is given to be 2.1 kg per minute. Neglecting the changes in KE kinetic and potential energy is determined the second law efficiency of the compressor, okay. So, basically we have situation like this. So, we have a compressor air enters at ambient condition then it is compressed to 650 kPa 187 degree Celsius. So, we apply steady flow energy equation to the compressor and we make use of the fact that air is an ideal gas and calorically perfect. So, we simply write H1 minus H2 as Cp times T1 minus T2. If we plug in the numbers we get Q dot to be minus 2.2711 kilowatts, okay. Remember the power of the compressor is given to be 8 kilowatts. So, Wx dot is actually minus 8. We need to keep that in mind. So, Q dot is known now and the rate of entropy generation and so exergy destruction may be evaluated like this. So, this is sigma dot. So, basically it is m dot times S2 minus S1 plus Q dot surroundings divided by T0 and you may recall that Q dot surrounding is equal to minus Q0 and S2 minus S1 here may be evaluated using the TDS relations because it is an ideal gas. So, if you go ahead with this you get the lost work expression for lost work reads like this and the lost work itself comes out to be 1.2102 kilowatts. So, now we can write the second law efficiency of the compressor as absolute value of Wx dot reversible divided by the absolute value of Wx dot. Remember this is a power absorbing device, okay. So, which means that so the lost work is added to reversible work. The actual work is more than the reversible work. So, the lost work is added to the reversible work to get the actual work. So, we may simplify this expression and evaluate the second law efficiency of the compressor as 85 percent. So, notice that here to get around the difficulty involving the negative sign for Wx dot we have used absolute values and we have treated lost work as what it is. So, lost work in this case adds to the reversible work to arrive at the actual work. So, the actual work is more than the reversible work because it is a power consuming device. The next example involves a steam turbine. So, here we have so steam enters the turbine steadily at 3 MPa 440 degree Celsius. So, we know that it is super heated based on the property values that are given at a rate of 8 kg per second and exits at 0.35 MPa and 160 degree Celsius. So, again we know that since pressure and temperature are given it is super heated at the exit also. Heat is lost to the surroundings at the rate of 500 kilowatts kilowatts. So, let us say so heat is lost to the surroundings at the rate of 500 kilowatts. Ke and Pe changes are negligible, determine the actual power output maximum possible power output and the second law efficiency. So, we can directly retrieve the values for specific enthalpy and specific entropy at the inlet and exit from the superheated table. And if we apply steady flow energy equation to the turbine we may get the actual power output as 3815.2 kilowatts. This is the actual power output. Now, if we add the lost work to this we get the maximum possible work or the reversible work, maximum possible power output or reversible power output. So, the rate of exergy destruction may be evaluated like this. So, remember exergy destruction is nothing but T0 times sigma dot.  So, if you plug in the values we get the rate of exergy destruction to be 679.5152 kilowatts. So, we add this rate of exergy destruction which is also lost work to WX2R actual to arrive at the maximum possible work or maximum possible power that we could have obtained from the turbine and that comes out to be 4494.72. Since this is a power producing device, the second law efficiency is simply WX dot actual divided by WX dot maximum. And the efficiency of the turbine second law efficiency comes out to be 85 percent or so, which is quite high. 85 percent second law efficiency is usually considered to be high, but typical of turbines. The next example that we will look at involves feed water heater or mixing chamber. So, steam at 1 mPa 300 degree Celsius. So, this is superheated steam enters at inlet 1 and saturated liquid water at 10 kilopascal whose pressure has been raised to isentropically to 1 megapascal enters the heater. So, steam at 1 megapascal and saturated liquid water whose temperature whose pressure has been raised to 1 mPa enters the heater. Heat is lost to the ambient at the rate of I am sorry heat loss to the ambient occurs at the rate of 100 kilowatts. If saturated liquid at 1 mPa is to exit the heater determine the required mass flow rate of steam for every unit mass flow rate of the exiting stream. So, that means m3 dot is 1 kg per second. So, we are asked to determine the amount of I am sorry the mass flow rate of steam that is required to accomplish the given conditions. Remember the condition is that saturated liquid at 1 mPa should leave the heater. So, we adjust the mass flow rate of steam until we are able to accomplish that. So, basically we assume the mass flow rate of steam to be x kg per second. So, this mass flow rate is then 1 minus x kg per second because this is at the exit the mass flow rate is 1 kg per second. We are asked to calculate the rate of x kg destruction and the second law efficiency of the feed water heater or mixing chamber. In the next module where we are going to discuss Rankine cycle you will learn this is usually referred to as a feed water heater and not as a mixing chamber in the next module. And this is although this is irreversible we know that mixing is highly reversible. This device is still very good device because it allows steam to be heated by mixing and not by adding heat to it directly. So, the water which comes in at 1 mPa is actually heated until it leaves as saturated liquid at 1 mPa. So, that means it is being heated to that temperature without directly adding heat and that reduces the external irreversibility associated with the heat addition process and actually increases the overall efficiency of the plant. We will see this in the next module. So, for the superheated steam that comes in through inlet 1 we may retrieve the property values like this and at state 3 we have saturated liquid at 1 mPa the state is given. So, we have hf h3 equal to hf and h3 equal to sf at 1 mPa. Now, state 2 is a compressed liquid state and temperature at state 2 is not known. Usually what we do is we approximate h of t comma p for a compressed liquid as uf of t plus p times vf of t but t is not known. So, here we have to resort to a slightly different tactic. We use the TDS relationship and write TDS equal to dh minus vdp. It is given that the water that is entering at inlet 2 is actually compressed isentropically from a pressure of 10 kPa to a pressure of 1 mPa. So, for that process we can take ds to be equal to 0 and dh then may be evaluated like this. So, h2 equal to hf at 10 kPa plus vf of 10 kPa times 1000 minus 10. So, the enthalpy of the liquid that is entering compressed liquid that is entering at inlet 2 works out to 192.72 and s2 equal to sf because it is an isentropic process. So, s2 equal to sf at 10 kPa and that is 0.6489. We also need the enthalpy or properties of the fluid at the reference state. So, at the reference state of 25 degree Celsius and 100 kPa it is a compressed liquid. So, we can get h0 as uf at 25 degree Celsius plus this. So, that is equal to this. And we may also approximate h0 as sf at 25 degree Celsius. So, now we have all the property values that we require. So, I suggest that you review this once more just to make sure that you are comfortable with what we have done. So, basically it is given that saturated liquid water at 10 kPa is compressed isentropically or is pressure is increased isentropically in a pump. So, that is the process that the water has undergone before entering inlet 2. So, basically if you recall, if I draw a TS diagram like this, let us say this is the isobar corresponding to 10 kilopascal and this is the isobar corresponding to 1 mPa. Then the saturated liquid at 10 kPa is pumped in a pump from 10 kPa to 1 mPa and that is an isentropic process. So, this is state 2. So, we apply TDS relation to this process, to this process the pumping process and we are able to calculate h2 and because it is an isentropic process, s2 is equal to sf at this state. So, that is what we have done. So, if we now apply steady flow energy equation to the feed water heater, we get x to be equal to 0.2345. So, for every kilogram per second of saturated liquid at 1 mPa that leaves the feed water heater, we need 0.2345 kg per second of steam. Now, specific exergy of the outgoing stream psi 3 may be evaluated like this after substituting the values here, psi 2 and psi 1 may also be evaluated in this in the same manner. So, the rate of exergy destruction is nothing but rate at which exergy comes in minus rate at which exergy leaves the feed water heater. So, this is the rate at which exergy comes in, this is the psi 3 is the rate at which exergy leaves the control volume. So, the rate of exergy destruction is 91.7135 kilowatts. Rate at which exergy enters, we already said that this is the rate at which exergy enters the feed water heater. So, this comes out to be 221.7 kilowatts. Therefore, we use the second law efficiency, this is not a work producing or a work absorbing device. So, you may recall that for such devices, we write the second law efficiency like this. So, rate at which or that we wrote it like this, exergy recovered divided by exergy supplied. So, rate at which exergy is recovered, so rate at which exergy is recovered is nothing but exergy supplied minus rate at which exergy is destroyed. So, this is equal to exergy supplied all on a rate basis because this is a steady flow problem minus exergy destroyed. So, that the final expression for each of two becomes 1 minus rate of exergy destruction divided by rate at which exergy is supplied and it comes out to be 58.6 percent. Now, as we said because it is a mixing chamber, its second law efficiency is poor, but in an overall sense because we are able to heat stream of water without directly supplying heat to it, the overall efficiency of the cycle still improves as we will demonstrate in the next module. The last example involves a cyclic process. So, here we have a direct heat engine. So, we have two reservoirs, one at TC. We have a direct heat engine which receives an amount of heat QH from a high temperature reservoir rejects heat to a low temperature reservoir at TC and we are asked to develop operates in a cycle and we are asked to develop an expression for the second law efficiency of the heat engine. So, the exergy recovered during each cycle basically is this plus the exergy associated with QC. You may recall that the exergy associated with QC may be written like this. Please go back and review the discussion on exergy transfer or racing from heat transfer and you should be able to write the exergy associated with heat rejection of QC to a reservoir at TC works out to be something like this. Now, the exergy supplied to the cycle is the equivalent of or is the exergy associated with QH and that works out to QH times 1 minus T0 divided by TH. So, we know exergy supplied, we know exergy recovered. So, second law efficiency because it is a power producing cycle, we may write second law efficiency as exergy recovered divided by exergy supplied and since the device operates in a cycle, W equal to QH minus QC. So, these two cancel out and if you divide through by QH, we may write this expression. So, here it has the actual efficiency of the cycle. So, eta is equal to and what we have done the denominator is to multiply and divide by a TC and then we have rewritten TC over TH by using the definition of the Carnot efficiency, eta Carnot equal to 1 minus TC over TH. So, this is the efficiency of a Carnot engine operating between the same two reservoirs. So, by using that we have rewritten the expression like this. So, this is the second law efficiency of the cycle expressed in terms of the first law efficiency and the Carnot efficiency. Now, if heat is rejected to the ambient instead of to the if heat is rejected to the ambient instead of to a reservoir at TC, basically we said TC equal to T0, then we get the second law efficiency of the cycle to be just eta over eta Carnot. Otherwise, if it is rejected to an intermediate reservoir at a temperature higher than the ambient temperature, this is the expression that we get. So, you can see that the second law efficiency gives us more perspective on the performance of the cycle and insights on the operations of components because we can define second law efficiencies for individual components which are executing a non-cyclic process. It gives us insights on the performance of the individual devices, the exergy destroyed and this will allow us. So, when we have let us say several designs for executing or accomplishing a certain process, this metric will allow us to make a comparative evaluation of these designs because they may be identical on a first law basis and which they will be usually. So, we need to discriminate against the poorer designs by using the second law efficiency. So, second law efficiency in the notion of exergy are thus very, very important in practical thermodynamic applications. So, what we are going to do in the next module is to discuss thermodynamic cycles. We will discuss three cycles. First one is the Rankine cycle or steam power cycle. Next one is the air standard cycle. Third one is the vapor compression refrigeration cycle, which is a power absorbing cycle. Now, the Rankine cycle and the vapor compression refrigeration cycle have as we showed in the previous course, they are genuine heat engines because there is a fixed quantity of mass of the working substance which executes the cyclic process throughout. So, whatever we have discussed, so it qualifies as a heat engine and the discussion proceeds very smoothly. Now, in the case of cycles that utilize air as the working substance, typically air is drawn from the atmosphere and then after passing through the engine, the air is then exhausted back to the atmosphere or clean air is taken from the ambient and usually combustion products are let out of the engine into the atmosphere. So, the air does not actually execute a cyclic process. So, what we will sort of try to do is to idealize the process by saying that a certain quantity of air executes a cyclic process just like in the case of Rankine cycle or vapor compression cycle and we will treat this as an idealized form of the actual process. So, this will be a cyclic process although the actual process involved in a gas turbine engine or a spark ignition engine or a diesel engine is not a cyclic process, but this will give us some ideas on the performance of such devices.


Hi and welcome to the session. I am Deepika here. Let's discuss the question find the values of x y and z from the following equations a 2 by 2 metrics whose elements are x plus y 2 5 plus z x y is equal to metrics 6 to 5 8. In this question, we will use a property of equal matrices Which means if two matrices are equal, then their corresponding element must be equal So we will use this property to solve the above question. Let's start the solution by equality of two matrices equating the corresponding elements we get plus y Is equal to 6. Let us take it as a 5 plus z is Equal to 5. Let us take it as b xy is equal to a Let us take it as c Now we will solve these equations From b we have 5 plus z is Equal to 5. This implies that this is equal to 0 now we will solve a and see From a we have x plus y is equal to 6 and from c we have xy is equal to 8 We have x minus y whole scale is equal to x plus y whole scale minus 4 x y Substitute the value of x plus y that is x plus y is equal to 6 and the value Of x y from c that is x y is equal to 8 in this formula we get x minus y whole scale is equal to 6 square minus 4 into 8 which is equal to 36 minus 32 Therefore x minus y square is equal to 4 which implies x minus y is equal to plus minus 2 Now we have two values of x minus y that is x minus y is equal to plus 2 and x minus y is equal to minus 2 if x minus y is equal to plus 2 then from a we have x plus y is equal to 6 on adding These equations we get x is equal to 8 this implies x is equal to 4 Put x is equal to 4 In a we get y is equal to 2 So in this case that is if x minus y is equal to 2 our solution is x is equal to 4 Y is equal to 2 and z is equal to 0 now consider the second case where x minus y is equal to minus 2 if X minus y is equal to minus 2 from a we have x plus y is equal to 6 On adding this we get 2x is equal to 4 this implies x is equal to 2 put x is equal to 2 in equation a in x plus y is equal to 6 we get y is equal to 4 So in this case our solution is x is equal to 2 y is equal to 4 z is equal to 0 Hence we get two solutions for x y z that is x is equal to 4 y is equal to 2 z is equal to 0 or x is equal to 2 y is equal to 4 Z is equal to 0. This is our answer. I hope you have understood the question by and have a good day


So, Wikipedia defines imposter syndrome as a concept describing high achieving individuals who are marked by an inability to internalize their accomplishment and a persistent fear of being exposed as a fraud, which is a pretty dry description. I prefer something much more blunt.  There's going to be a few quotes. So this is a quote by Ron Chenow, who's a historian and an autobiographer, and he's describing someone that I think has imposter syndrome. And I really like the quote because it's quite direct, but I think the key fry is the one at the end, the unspoken melancholy of the prodigy. Put another way, the more you know, the more you know you don't know. The person who Chenow was describing was most active during the 1780s, yes, 1780s, but his actions still influence how we live to this very day. What's his name? Alexander Hamilton, he's Alexander Hamilton.  For better or worse, the system that he and the other founding fathers implemented very much affects our day-to-day lives to this very day. And talking about historical characters is really quite interesting, especially if I use a publicity still from the musical based on Alexander Hamilton's life, which may or may not be my current obsession. However, the nature of these talks require that I open up. The nature of these talks require allowing you into the speaker's dark places. The nature of these talk require confessing to thoughts that the speaker would rather keep to themselves. The nature of these talks require dropping the self-confidence, sorry, yes, dropping the veneer of confidence and allowing the self-doubt to shine. And the nature of these talks asks something of you, all of you as members of the audience too. They ask you to acknowledge that. And as an aside, and I'm going to get a little bit meta here, I'm afraid, I was a little bit late writing this talk. And as Tarek will be able to tell you, I got quite nervous that I was even going to be able to deliver this talk. Now, I've delivered talks many times with varying levels of success. So I basically got imposter syndrome when it came to writing my talk about imposter syndrome. So there's a reason though that I ask you to acknowledge the nature of these talks and it's the same reason that I got nervous. Basically, Peter Wilson, the self-confident character based on my own life, presents these talks. But today, the real me needs to present with all my human flaws. Today, I'll be talking about imposter syndrome from the perspective of a developer. For developer, there are always new tools being developed and required to learn. There's new frameworks being released. There's new tools introduced for writing existing code. And it's the same for other web professionals, be they writers, illustrators, mark tiers. And I'm sure it's the same for other industries. But I can't talk to any of that. I can only talk as my experience as a developer. For developers, it's not helped by this meme, that you're not a real developer if you use Wordpress, Drupal, or Joomla. Now, I chose this tweet for a few reasons. As you can see, it's from 2005, so it's really old. But it's also a quote. So what I'm saying is, don't look up the person who tweeted this, hunt them down, and the two of them are the same. So what I'm saying is, don't look up the person who tweeted this, hunt them down, and the two of them are the same. So what I'm saying is, don't look up the person who tweeted this, hunt them down, and attack them for publishing a quote on the internet. Now, my immediate reaction to quotes like this is to think that they're hogwash. It's about as logical as me tweeting that you're not a real developer unless you can optimize this CSS without converting it from its binary form. It's ridiculous. If you can open your editor of choice and write code that works as you intend, you are a real developer.  But it's more than that. You don't need the validation of some randoms on Twitter telling you what is or isn't real development. So they're my thoughts when someone tries to tell me what is or is real development and that I'm not a real developer. But that's not the bit that sticks. What the devil inside me says is far more hurtful. You're not a good developer. I mentioned during the introduction that these talks require removing the veneer of confidence. These are my thoughts without it. I can see that objectively I'm relatively successful. It's just that one day my career is bound to come crashing down around me. I've made this comment behind me on stage a number of times on WordCamp stages. I see myself as a front-end developer who knows enough back-end to be dangerous. It was never entirely true, but it was a self-effacing way of saying that I started as a front-end developer before becoming a back-end developer. What is entirely true is that I came to the web from the front-end with my first book on web development, being a first-edition HTML for dummies in 1995. What is also true is that I spend my working day with developers who have worked on good, honest, proper programming languages their entire career. They most certainly didn't start with a programming for dummies book sometime in the mid-90s. My job is working on enterprise-grade WordPress sites that human-made. When I went for the job, I very much emphasized my experience as a front-end developer. By way of comparison, two of my colleagues were on the core team of four that led the development of the WordPress REST API. I can recreate the blink tag in six lines of CSS. These days, I find myself writing much more PHP than I do anything else. But I spend a lot of time on Google looking up the documentation. My internal monologue loves to make a witty remark about being endorsed for guesswork on LinkedIn. Every now and then, one of the real developers will give me some good, honest CSS to get my teeth into because it's nice to have a good, proper front-end developer around when they're needed. And my internal monologue rejoins that it's not worth wasting the time of a real developer just to do the CSS.  So that's the disconcertingly honest kind of thinking that goes into imposter syndrome. I'm not going to make anyone put up their hand, but I'm willing to heavily bet that at least some of you in this room saw a little bit of yourselves in this talk, which begs the question, how to manage imposter syndrome? Clear Left is one of the leading digital agencies globally, and they're particularly leaders when it comes to front-end development. And they have a really simple approach when it comes to sharing knowledge in their office. They have this, a skills board. I can look at this board and I can see that if I want to know about responsive images, I go to Mark. If I want to know about using media queries inside responsive SVGs, I go to Charlotte. I love this idea for a number of reasons. It's smart as it is simplistic. The skill board says that there is an expectation of learning on the job. It says there are skills you will require for your job that you don't know yet. Go off, learn them, jot a note on the skills board when you're done so that you can share that learning. The expectation of learning is not the important bit, though. The most important bit is the expectation of ignorance, the reverse side of the coin. It's saying you have the ability to do this, but you just don't know the messy details yet. The logic behind development, be it front-end development or back-end development, is far more important than any particular detail. Looking at this board, I really like that it's held together with post-it notes and sticky tape. It's a lot like knowledge itself. One of the reasons I feel like an imposter is because I don't know stuff off the top of my head. I need to look it up. A few weeks ago on Twitter, there was what my internal monologue dubbed the you're a real developer, if mean. Senior developers with loads of experience were posting their not-so-guilty secrets about how they'd work. A Google lead confessing to having to look up how to get a string's length in Python every single time they need to write it. A real developer confessing to copying things from Stack Overflow. Sound familiar? I said earlier you don't need the validation of randoms on Twitter to tell you what is or isn't real. However, when hundreds of people are sharing their experience has been less than perfect, it's a valuable reminder that you can be less than perfect too. So what does all this mean? How does this help manage the imposter? Having the knowledge on its own doesn't necessarily help. You need to use the knowledge to stamp down the inner monologue trying to undermine you. I've found that having the knowledge isn't enough, so what helps? If writing 3D transforms on a blue post-it note to remind you that you can do something helps, then do it. If you work alone, you might feel a little strange putting a blue post-it note with your skills up on your desk. In that case, use your notebook, just write it in the back of your notebook. And when you're having a bad day, look at it. I use Twitter, like I use it a lot. So I went through and favorited a bunch of these tweets to remind me that a lot of people are working in exactly the same way I am. By choosing to manage imposter syndrome, it's possible you'll never feel like an imposter again. That's a white lie. That is an 18-carat white gold lie. But these things are supposed to finish on a good note. I've decided that, for me at least, there is probably no getting over imposter syndrome. And I expect it's the same for many other people. So the best we can do is hope to persevere with the veneer of confidence and build up techniques to help work around it. I hope you'll bear with me as I go back to my obsession, Hamilton the Musical. A good deal of the opening act is centered around the American Revolution, the War of Independence. The battle at which the Revolutionaries effectively won independence, both in fact and in fiction, is the Battle of Yorktown. One of Hamilton's mates, Hercules Mulligan, infiltrates the army as a spy and passes on details to the Revolutionaries. And he returns victorious with this rap. So that's what happens when you up against the Ruffians.  Hercules Mulligan, a nino introduction.  For whatever reasons, some days imposter syndrome will knock you down. The best advice I can offer doesn't come on that day. It comes the day after.  Some days you're in a monologue will make that hard to do. Other days you'll be able to swap the self-doubt for self-confidence. But there's a problem with this advice. Just get back up again. It's terrible advice. It's terrible, terrible advice. So I'm going to go with another Hamilton quote. A different Hamilton though. This time Samuel Hamilton, Hamilton from John Steinbach's East of Eden. Suppose a disbelief in myself forced me to do a magic to bring to the surface a thing I know anyway. Does that make sense? Deciding to be a Ruffian and push yourself back up is the magic. It's the trick. It's the character you play to get over the self-doubt. It's the character that I play on stage. And sometimes it's the character I play in the office to bring back the self-confidence. Does that make sense to you? No. It makes no sense to me either. But it works and it helps me get over the feeling like an imposter. I hope you can feel it. I hope you can find a trick that works for you. Thank you very much. My name's Peter Wilson. I'm from DCC on Twitter. And I'm a Ruffian.


What is going on guys welcome back to channel critical over here since I'm a halloween into this video here again today and Going to talk about the idea of us getting a flashback back to the Myers house in 1978 in this movie now We know that at the end of halloween kills we got that or I think there's a couple times actually Where we saw young Michael Myers We saw Karen see young Michael Myers looking out the window I'm assuming After he killed his sister or maybe even like shortly prior to whatever happened that led up to the events that We saw at the beginning of the 1978 film We saw young Michael Myers in his in his recognizable clown costume and Then he of course was gone is like an hallucination. So I'm getting to think maybe they dive into the Myers house once again and Something goes down where someone is kind of just being able to piece together or something in their head where we jump back to the night that Michael killed Judith and We actually get to see what happened when his parents found him all we see is them finding him He's standing there clearly looking like he has no idea what's going on He's not aware of what he what he's doing it's as if the person that was originally in control of the body is an autopilot and Something else is taking full control because you see a very confused look on that little boy's face Somebody who's just not there all the way there doesn't clear doesn't know what they're doing And then his parents are just They're just looking at him trying to understand. What are they looking at? They see him with a bloody knife I think his father when walking up to him says Michael before we're taking off the mask and We see this this innocent looking child is normal looking child and we the audience are right there along with the parents Like what the hell are you doing? What what is going on? So maybe in Halloween ends we get to see some aftermath from that We get to see them go into the house Discover Judas body and then maybe there's something that goes down between Michael and his parents Maybe for maybe specifically Michael's father where maybe we tapped into Some of the stuff that might have contributed to what went or what made him go wrong I'm not saying they need to go that far. I actually prefer they don't but let's just say they decide to do that Maybe they do show us the fallout of what happened after the parents went inside the house with Michael's I'm assuming they went back inside the house discovered Judas body, obviously I'm assuming maybe there was a reaction from the mother similar to how the Similar how Mrs. Becker reacted when she saw Casey outside of the house in the original screen Maybe something like that goes down and then maybe there's some brief altercations or Hostility between Michael and his father and now to make it even worse or to make it even more interesting I think you could do don't have the father abusive towards Michael. Don't do that because then that would start to lend to Giving us hints that maybe there's some abuse that will go on between the father and the son and then people gonna start drawing connection Oh, he was he was abused and he came from a bad home now. You're reaching into Rob zombie territory I would rather it just be something that is more of a reaction to the fact He just found his daughter dead and his little boy is the one holding the knife and at first He can come to him very confused and just wanting to get answers But then it becomes into into a aggression now now this can still all just be delivered from the father's voice But here's where it gets more compelling Michael will continue to have this look on his face that shows no signs of emotion That that confusion that's on his face has disappeared and it's just literally that expression that dr Loomis described blank pale emotionless face No signs of being confusing more at this point It's really clear that the boy who was in control before is not the same individual in control now I'm not saying that we're gonna jump in into like people body hopping or anything like that I'm just saying that's how it could come across that there clearly was a mental shift in this boy's brain We're now the way he looked outside after he just after the parents that came home is completely different to now How he looks inside the house? There's no emotion. There's no look of confusion. It's just a literal face that shows nothing no signs of being being a Dominant or defying or defiant towards his father nothing like that It's just nothing this everything that dr. Loomis described and we're seeing the fallout of them Finding their daughter upstairs dead trying to get answers out of there out of their young son who isn't responding and Michael is just sitting there and we can explore we can explore that we can have the have the events play out of the Paramedics arriving and explaining that Michael was one who did it we can see Michael get admitted to Smith's Grove maybe we see a little glimpse of Michael Myers in Smith's Grove with a dr. Loomis Recreation once again like how they recreated dr. Loomis in halloween kills, which was done tremendously well and you know It could be something like that somehow Exploring that in halloween ends. I don't know what event will cause that but I think it would be a cool thing to see This wouldn't be done in a way again. I don't think it should be done in a way where you get Your audience thinking about oh, that's why he snapped It should just be something that is just an extension of what we saw at the beginning of Halloween 1978 We get to see the fallout of the parents finding Judas body Seeing how they reacted further to Michael not only now finding him outside of their house with a bloody knife But then when you went inside we don't know how they reacted to Michael after finding Judas body How did they probably interrogate him and how was Michael in regards all that again? I would keep Michael very emotionless I would have us see the paramedics arrive and take Judith the way I would have the police come Try to talk to Michael. Somebody could come try to talk to Michael There's just there's just nothing there's there's nothing everyone's trying to get through the Michael and it's just nothing and Michael gets taken and Taken into custody admitted to Smith's Grove and then maybe we don't even get to see his time in Smith's Grove But that could just be something that stops right there like the fallout of them going back into the house Finding Judas body and then fleshing out how they responded to Michael even further beyond that Maybe you guys would like to see that maybe you guys think that's too much and we don't need to have something like that I'm not saying it's a necessity, but I think it'll be a nice cool thing to expand on that Doesn't take away from what was already established by the original film itself I would I again don't think you should take it in a direction where you start answering questions about what might have cost him to Kill his sister. I don't think we should leave anything like that lying around in the scene I don't think there should be any bits of dialogue at point towards anything Everything should be still left up in the air about why Michael did that It should be made even more clear that this man comes from a functioning home he comes from a home where there's two parents that care about him and he had a loving sister and I Think that would be make it even better. His surroundings should show signs of his actions not making more sense He's coming from a home. That's not broken Which I think would make it even more compelling and then you have him sitting there in all this silence The police can't reach him his parents can't reach him And we get to see the fallout of them going back into the house and discovering Judas body I just think that would be something nice to see if they revisited a young Michael Myers once again in Halloween And somehow factor that into a flashback some way, but let me know what you guys think about that down in the comment section below Would if you haven't already of course make sure you subscribe turn on postification Yeah, there's a video in the description of links from social media accounts my face with Twitter and Instagram You can message me there of course limiters any movies news or views like me to cover in the future with all that in mind Guys, I will see you in the next video


Hi, I'm Chris Thompson for Investor Intel, and today I'm with Claudia Tornquist, who is the president and CEO of Kodiak Copper, which trades on the TSX Venture Exchange with the ticker KDK. How are you today, Claudia? I'm doing very well. Thanks for having me. It's great to be here, Chris. So you are the president of Kodiak Copper, but I think that at this time, you know, we can just take a little bit of the discussion about the chairman, because the chairman has been recently in the news with another sister company of yours, Grave Bear. So why don't you talk a little bit about Chris Taylor and that opportunity and how it ties together with Kodiak? Yes, that's of course big news. Grave Bear, our sister company, received a takeover offer from Kinross for $1.8 billion. Fantastic success for Chris, who started both Kodiak and Grave Bear. And it's interesting the way he made a success of Grave Bear is in a way very similar to what he did for Kodiak. He took a project that lots of people had looked at. Didn't see anything in it, the Dixie project in Grave Bear's case. And he interpreted it in a different way and made it obviously a fantastic success. And Kodiak is a little bit of a similar story. Again, Chris is our technical lead. And he was the one originally who liked the MPD project, Southern British Columbia, where we made our discovery. It was a project that had been explored since the 60s. Nobody was able to crack it. And Chris looked at it, took a different approach. We made a discovery right in our maiden drill program. So it just brings it home how important it is to back the right team. And Chris certainly is a fantastic geologist, very much out of the box thinking. And that's what makes a good opportunity, a good geologist, someone who sees an opportunity where other people don't. And this you're talking about is the MPD project as a copper gold project, what they would call a porphyry project in British Columbia. And you had a fairly big drill season this year with some recently released drill results. Maybe you could just talk about what the program was for 2021 and your recent drill results. Yes, we certainly have had a big year of drilling and total growth just under 22,000 meters to follow up on our high grade discovery that we made in 2020. It was a very successful drill program. We intersected the high grade zone at, it's called gate on MPD multiple times. And at every stage, whenever we released results throughout the year, we're able to grow the zone and show more mineralization. When we started the year, we had strike lengths over which we had build mineralization of only 125 or so meters. So quite small. Now we have almost a kilometer of mineralization drilled. So the gate zone has grown substantially. We're starting to see some real nice size and obviously still lots more to come. We haven't completed the drilling by no means. We will be drilling more at gate next year and also other targets on the property. So just talking about your recent drill results, you know copper porphyries are fairly large systems. You had a fairly good intercept. It was 126 meters with some high grade copper gold. Maybe you can just discuss that. Yes, that's the last set of results we released. The best hole was 126 meters of 0.87% copper equivalent within a much longer intercept of 537 meters of 0.45% copper equivalent. That's quite typical for a porphyry where you have a high grade center or centers within a much larger lower grade envelope. And just to put our grades into perspective, a good comparable is the mine next door, copper mountain, large porphyry mine. Their grades, the material they mine is 0.23% copper with 0.1 gram gold. So in comparison, our grades are significantly higher in the high grade zone, what we've built there. And that obviously bodes well and is very promising. And looking to forward to next year, how is the bank account and what are your plans with the money you would have for the next season? Well, we have a big bill program planned for next year as well, aiming for 25,000 meters, not only at gate, but also other targets, the alert and man and axe and potentially others. So lots on the cards for next year. Our treasury is at this point, $9 million. So we're well funded and under no pressure to finance, which is of course, a great situation to be in. Well, that seems very exciting. And I guess it all plays into the copper itself as a commodity. We've seen a good run in the last year with copper. And I think as we move towards more electrification of the grid, copper will be important. What are your thoughts on the copper market? I think you put it well, the electrification, net zero, that's the real drivers of copper demand for many years to come. And I just read a statistic, 80% of the world economy is now under a net zero emissions target. So a lot of change will happen, a lot of electric vehicles will be built, solar, wind energy, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And all those technologies, all those enabling technologies are very copper intensive. So there's a lot of copper demand on the horizon and more copper will need to be found and more mines will need to be built. And that's what our business is. Well, that's great. I think that that's it for today. I think that you have some good potential there with your current drill results, really bode well for the project. And we look forward to following it over the next few months and speaking with you again sometime soon. I will speak today with Claudia Tornquist, who is the president and CEO of Kodiak Copper. And you can trade on the symbol KDK on the TSX Venture Exchange. Thanks for your time, Claudia. Thank you.


I wonder if I could try this cool watch on a living you see all these kind of heights like they make these things I like things to be what they are like at least either your cleanser or your Moisturizer, I don't the whole a cool watch that could be a living that that that kind of heights I really don't know about that, but it might make for interesting TV Vincent put it back. What do you see? Trini girl natural Hi everyone, welcome to my channel coming to you with a nice big hair And I actually get hate comments anytime I wear my hair like more in an Afro state So I'm expecting the hate comments, but I don't care learn to love yourself Anyhow, so yeah coming on to do a cousin push-ins review a Part two I guess because I did one before as you guys saw and definitely check that out first Maybe to get some context for this one But basically I did a cousin push-ins demo and review last time and the owner was really nice Recommended that I try her leaving under the curling jelly. So I'm back to do that So I got the not tonic leaving, but she recommended I'm still using the curling jelly again I will talk about how it behave differently this time and I picked up this special extra treat the sweet fixer elixir So I'll definitely be reviewing this one as well Spoiler of this, okay Okay, so I mentioned in my whole video that it said it could be a co-wash or leave it and I was a bit Lost and confused at that. So I decided to come and test it out for you just for the hey just to try it and Just to let you guys know in case you were curious as I mentioned in the whole video The ingredients are kind of right down the middle of cleanser and leaving I follow the directions So just to make sure I had everything right, but you know It basically said just use as any other co-wash in any other leaving. So nothing too special to the directions But still it's a very gentle cleanser as in probably not to use if your hair is actually dirty But if you just want a little refresh, maybe it would do the trick for you I don't think I'll use it as a co-wash again. Not that it was bad But it just wasn't quite cleansing enough for me and I felt like it left a slight slight Deposit on my hair like not a lot But since I don't put coating things on my hair like when it does happen I recognize it instantly Well, I guess I don't put coating things as a rinse out So I personally wouldn't use it as a co-wash, but definitely give it a whirl and see so it did have a slight amount of foam And it does have some cleansing ingredients. So it definitely made my hair feel cleaner than before I wouldn't say it did nothing. It just didn't go up to Cleansing enough to be co-wash level for me But I do like that it distributed well and Refresh my scalp Refresh my hair. So my scalp is ready for the week I don't feel like my scalp is dirty or anything like that, but I just use very light products So this is just more of a co-wash and if you use like silks and stuff, they're saying the co-wash for you But basically, anyways, yeah, so when I rinse down the co-wash because I'm using it as a co-wash now When I rinse down the co-wash my hair was just a soft fluff So it didn't feel slightly coated, but it also felt soft and moisturized so That's what I got. I got a soft moisturized very slightly deposited on fluff And I expect to leave it to deposit. If you guys use any Trin ones I know the main choice is popular. If you use a Trin one as a plant I'm a conditioner Let me know in the comments below. But then on to the good news the sweet Alexa fixer So I love this. It was just light. It smells great Penetrated well, like instant moisture, great slip Yay Yay for this. I just love chocolate. I love the scent. I feel like it's aromatic plus it works really well in your hair And it's moisturizing and then she had the honey as well, which is also moisturizing So I was looking forward to a great wash there and I wasn't disappointed It was kind of interesting because it was just super light It didn't like wet down my hair at all. So if you are fine hair, definitely fine hair approved Definitely low price to be approved and I really enjoyed using it. It kind of reminds me of the becquerel Cocoa mask I guess, but it's less oily and probably lighter than that. Both of them work well So don't even if I can choose one over the other but this one definitely probably priced a bunch better because you know that Becquerel is crazy expensive So this one I'm definitely very purchasing which is good because I wanted to try more of her stuff I want to try her rice stuff and her chibi stuff. So Yeah, another course of questions who are coming up and I would definitely include this and I'll probably check out some more Pretty conditional so she has them. This was my favorite from everything as you can tell Loving it. Yeah, so when you open it you like yeah, this is cocoa and you can see it's running a bit So it is a light consistency It smells probably more like honey like a slightly sweet honey cocoa scent, but I love the scent It's not super strong and again. It smells pretty natural. So it's almost kind of I wouldn't say whipped It's just light. I don't know how let me see if I can this is the texture. So it is I guess slightly whipped It looks almost like edible, but don't And it just goes in really nice and everything so this was a winner for me for sure Definitely can't wait to get some more love the scent Soft moisturized great slip just everything you want from a deep conditioner. So after I rinse this out I'm back to the Natonic as a leave-in So I would say I liked it better as a leave-in I felt like it had great slip and I felt like it was moisturizing and I felt like it defined my curls really well as well I'm going to try it again as a leave-in Maybe I might try both of these again and put a different styler on it because in the first video I tried this With the soltanicals leave-in and it didn't work that well together But when I used this over this the slip was great and the moisture was great So if I try this one this and put a moisturizing gel over it, I'm expecting perfection So my first try with the curling potion The curling potion was just too stiff and not moisturizing enough for my hair So it left my hair kind of frizzy, but crunchy and Kind of dry and everything was going on This combination my hair doesn't feel dry. It feels more moisturized Just think in terms of the color too, but I like how she keeps her stuff more natural Like I just feel like it's more natural. I feel like I'm in her kitchen with her and she's like, you know So I love when products are like that as opposed to just over formulated over stripped of The goodies give me the good stuff. So yay. So nice light creamy lotion We're trying to get some of it to the other side to show you It will sit really nice. So no issue with that and I hit my My hands and my hair. I guess feel nice and moisturize And I like this set. That's a nice really set. So I do feel happy about the leaving and happy about the deep conditioner The deep conditioner was a definite. Yes. I'm kind of top of the pile Leaving was a definitely a good leaving and I'll definitely probably be purchased at least once I have to try it again When my mind's not a complete blur from just all the excitement of Co-washed leave ins and amazing deep conditioners, I guess And then I use the curling jelly over the nut tonic and as you guys saw before it's a cream And it does have a light hole. So I wouldn't say it has no hole, but it's definitely a light hole It's kind of thick too, which is nice. It's interesting. So it's pretty thick Like not super duper thick. It's still a cream But it's not like a light whipped cream. It has like a solid feel to it. Let me show you how the cream goes in So as you can see It's pretty kind of thick, but it works. See nice if you like bigger hair And if you're looking for a light hole Moisturizing jelly like cream then try. I think it'll probably be great for twists and stuff So you guys who like like a little hole in your twisting cream definitely give it a try for that But I enjoyed it with my wash and dome I don't want to go into too much detail because I've reviewed it already, but Let me just do it again. Just so everything will be clear against the ingredients are great I think in everything the ingredients are great And I like the performance of pretty much everything that I tried today. My hair is big But you can still see some definition So I may not get you the week, but I'm definitely going to enjoy a couple days of big hair with this wash and dome And I love it.  Let me know in the comments below Which products do you like chat with me? Let's talk. Let's talk Definitely check out her website like I mentioned. She has like right stuff. She has like k-bay stuff Her deconditioner is awesome. I love the leaving as well Plus some of her proceeds go towards breast cancer research as I mentioned before so definitely check it out and Happy shopping. Happy pijing. Happy natural hair product buying and using to all Let me know if you use chain ones like something that's a cleanser And I'll leave it at the same time as well in the comments below just to let me know about that I hope you have fun. I hope this was informative. I hope it helped you out But yeah, that was it. Thanks for watching you guys. I'll definitely see you in the next one. Bye