So what is happening here is the former president as constitutional immunity. Prosecution starts from investigations. You cannot search the premises of the former president. He enjoys constitutional immunity. What is happening here is totallessness and should not be allowed. Many Zambians remember that I worked for the former president, Dr. Frederick Churwa, for 10 years. We had similar situations where the task force on corruption wanted to search the former president before his immunity was lifted. It was not possible. And you will remember that the day that Dr. Churwa's immunity was lifted, a horde of police like this stormed his residence. And that process went for two years. And the task force on corruption and the police stayed the way they couldn't search him until the Supreme Court at the time confirmed the coming from President Haka'inde Ichilema. At every turn, he's accusing his former president that he will not allow that to happen. So when the president, sitting president says, I will not allow this to happen, what does that mean? This is what it means. Law enforcement agencies will be lawless to people like President Longu because he's at the mouth of the current president. He has so far spoken three times disparaging his former president and saying he will not allow the former president as if President Haka'inde Ichilema is a constitution. President Longu is eligible to stand if he wants. But he has said he's in retirement and you need to respect that. So I just wanted to emphasize that what you are seeing here is totallessness, abuse of the constitution, abrogation of the constitution. And these police officers must leave. Whoever is directing them, they must leave because they are here illegally. If they want, let them leave this immunity. Then they can come and investigate and search him. I have seen the former president, Dr. Edgar Chagua Longu. I have seen the former first lady, Mama Esther Longu. The police were here slightly before six and this standoff you are seeing has been going on for the last four hours. They requested that their lawyers be present because you've seen the horde of police that are here. They really, I don't know what they've come for because this is not for an investigation, especially for the armed policemen that are here. We wish to restate that the former president as constitutional immunity. You cannot search his premises. You cannot. The former first lady, according to the search warrant who they want, they can issue a police call out and she will comply. But you can't forcibly attempt to go into the premises where the former president is. Whether it's a rented property or not, you cannot do that. That's total lawlessness. They claim that they want to search the former first lady. They claim that there are certain vehicles that they are looking for and that they want to then search the house and the entire premises. The lawyers have read to them what the law states, that the first lady is a spouse to the former president and the two live together at this house. And this house, they cannot have access to it, whether they purport that they are doing investigations or they wish to prosecute until they do what the law is required. I have had negotiations with the police. The name of Mr. Sian Dengue, commissioner of police, keeps on coming up. He's the one directing this entire operation. Mr. Sian Dengue, I want to look you in the eye. You report to the president, you are probably seated next to the president. You are probably briefing the president about this illegality. Advise the president the correct thing because the abuse of the law you are doing is the president who is committing this breach. It is not you. You are appointed by the president and if you wish to be unlawful, if you wish to perpetuate legality, it's the president you are putting on the line for future prosecutions. If this government is keen to investigate the former president, they should do what is allowed by the law. The president is in jovial mood, is shocked by this conduct. The former First Lady of Sina, she is willing to go to the police even now if the issue is called out to find out why they want her. She has wondered why they are dealing with her, like she's a fugitive. She said the last time the DEC wanted me, I reported to DEC. What is the difference where they come up? 0-4, 0-5 and they come with such warrants purporting that she has stolen vehicles. Can the First Lady steal vehicles? We want to work our ways. Sure, it's time now. What's happening? Have they been allowed to go ahead? The police have threatened to storm the residents. We are waiting for them to break the law. We are waiting for them to breach the law. The law is very clear. This is where the former president is. If Sian Dengue has told them that they can breach, they get and enter and go and search, for us there is nothing we can do. Because if the police wish to behave like we are a police state, we can't bond with them. We are not fighting, yet. They are fighting. They are fighting. I am not going to be able to think. I am not going to think. And before I allow Ponovo GBM to come in, we as a patroly front are putting this on President Hakainda Ichilema. He's the one that keeps on issuing public statements that he will not allow the former president to come in. So what does he mean when he says he will not allow him? As the president becomes the constitution, even when President Lungu has said that he's not coming back, he has said that he's in retirement. The fear by President Hakainda against his predecessor is now motivating this lawlessness you have seen today. So what we are saying is my first lady, make her our president. So how will you conduct that search without breaching the constitutional rights of the former president?  For someone to send some people to come and start searching for a former president. Mind you, you should also realize that one day you'll be a former. Just because you've seen that the PF is still popular, it will remain popular. Zambians are suffering. Why don't you first deal with the issues of Zambians, the way they are suffering. Give them food, give them three meals a day which you promised them. Today you are Western, even PF. Because you've seen that the popularity of our former president is getting higher, now you want to start intimidating. We are there to support him. Let's stand up for Eddie Galungu. Let's support him. People of Zambia, you've seen the difference now between PF and UPND. You've seen who are saying the truth. Who are the hypocrites? Who are the liars? Who lied to you that they will turn this country into a gold mine? Today Zambia is something else. People are suffering like nobody's business. When I walk in a supermarket, everybody there is complaining. People have become Western their way under the leadership of President Eddie Galungu. What I'm trying to say is that please stop intimidating. Stop harassing the former president. He has told you in no uncertain times that he is not returning back to politics. We are there and I'm one of the presidential candidates. Now, we know in case I'm in and they're in. So 2026, Mundo Leleban and they say. So, you can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. Stop lying to the Zambian people.  You were at a lot of elections around the world. The lawyers today have let you down. There is a lot of hunger. First deal with issue of hunger. People are suffering. Thank you, thank you Honour Bojibian. You should arrest the high cost of living, you should arrest the high cost of fuel, you should arrest the high cost of food prices, you should not be arresting his political opponents. My reiteration is to Deputy Police Inspector General Mr. Sian Dengue. By the way I worked with him in western province, he was my police commissioner at the time. I'm sincerely appealing to you. You cannot subvert, you cannot abuse the powers of the Inspector General of Police.  It's imperative that you respect that hierarchy. I am the president of the QA, I am the president of the QA, I am the boss of the Mausoleum film company. Do not conduct operations that are political, be professional as a police. That is our advice to Commissioner Sian Dengue and we are on fame ground. That is one maliciously directing this process. Okay, you are aware that we are here the police arrived at zero six hours just before six and they demanded to search the premises they said they had obtained a warrant to search the premises this premises is the residence of the former president Zambia's sixth president Dr. Edgar Chagwa and technical issues arise constitutional issues arise legal issues arise the police purport that they are looking for the first lady and that they are issues connected to the former first lady that they want to search according to the warrant I have not seen the world our lawyers informed them that this is a premises of the former president we enjoy his constitutional immunity and it's not possible that you can search the first lady who lives at the premises of the former president it's just not possible because you've been interfering with the constitutional rights of the former president I went in earlier and I spoke both to the president and to the former first lady and the former first lady made it very clear that she's lawful law-abiding citizen she has previously been called for investigations to the drug enforcement commission and she complied so she wondered why there was this huge operations operation against her she has advised his lawyers please come sir please come join us she has advised the lawyers that if the police want want they can issue a police call out and she will comply and come to the police however the police have insisted that they need to conduct searches and the various consultations that have been going on the last one now appear that the police are determined to conduct the search the standoff you are seeing is exactly that now the former president has not consented to the search of his premises he has not but the police are insisting that they'll conduct the search you've seen back and forth our lawyers and the police having those discussions we have made it very clear that if they want a former first lady she will report to the police if there's anything they want connected to her whether it's a motor vehicle or whatever and if she has knowledge about it she will avail it to the police so this is where we are the police have sent a word to the former president and the former first lady that they are determined to execute the warrant so where entry has been denied I don't know how they will execute other than to storm the premises other than to bugle into the premises other than to force entry into their premises Honourable welcome to this interview aware of what is happening and hope you are following no offense please you can say the remarks especially on behalf of the patriotic front well I think what you said is adequate we all know that this is as a result of paranoia that miss HLM has and the UP and they are two things at work one the fact that the front remains strong and united to there's a man people are debating the performance of miss HLM in comparison to the performance of president and clearly the distinction is in black and white and therefore they are friends have been running a narrative which in the process have decided to believe a narrative of the coming back of former president I think colleagues have already commented on so that is what is at work this is total madness to have a former head of state who enjoys immunity are being stormed by a police to have a search in the manner that this is being conducted it's very unfortunate but I can only one my brother miss HLM you can only govern in the midst of peace you can't govern in the midst of confusion ever is advising you but I'm not I'm not I'm just advising you as a young brother, can you stop this nonsense? Thank you very much. Thank you colleagues, we'll wait for the storming in.


The goal of this video is to derive Ohm's law from the microscopic point of view by looking at Electrons and this is not a standalone video. We have done a lot of work before this in previous videos So we're just gonna pick up from where we left off. So before we start Let's quickly, you know recap whatever stuff that we've already seen We saw that Paul Druda a German physicist was the first person around 1900s to start giving an explanation a model To explain this and his idea was he treated electrons as tiny tiny particles tiny balls of matter And he said that then you you know when you put a when you put a battery There's an electric field that accelerates the electrons, but the electrons don't travel in straight lines because there are a lot of Crystal ions metal ions over here. These electrons are continuously Bombarding continuously bouncing off sorry continuously bouncing off these different different ions And so it has a very zigzaggy kind of motion. And so here's how we visualized it We electrons are moving with extremely high random velocities thousands of kilometers per second thermal motion We say but that's not gonna get them anywhere because they keep bouncing back and forth However in the presence of an electric field, we do see that slowly and steadily it starts moving across the conductor And it's this motion that contributes to the electric current and we call this the drifting motion And we figured out what that drifting velocity was and so coming back So what we did is we said look we are no longer imagining that the electron we can forget about this We can forget about this and instead we can imagine that all the electrons are moving with a constant Velocity and that's what we call the drift velocity. They're not doing that But that's what contributes to electric current. So this is how we assumed and we figured out what the drift velocity was We found that that drift velocity is this number and the way we calculated is this is the acceleration Which is force acting on the electric electrons divided by mass So this is the acceleration of the electrons multiplied by the time and this time is the average time between two successive collisions We call that relaxation time and so the surprising thing over here was even though the electrons are continuously accelerated by the field The net motion is constant velocity. It's it doesn't change We can assume that it's moving with a constant velocity. This is the most important part of this entire derivation Then we used this model to figure out what the electric current was in terms of drift velocity And we forgot that the electric current Equals this number and again to give you a little sense of what this number is saying this n represents the number of electrons per unit volume It's the number density of the electrons and so this over here tells you how many electrons are passing per second So this if you think about it is the volume of the electrons per second volume travel per second And this is a total electrons per second and you multiply it by the charge to give you total charge And again, this is derived previously so you can go back and revise if is necessary now With these two we have to figure out or we have to derive or prove Ohm's law All right, so where do we start well since Ohm's law has current and voltage in it and I see current Let's start from here I know the expression for current and I can substitute the expression for V D or here. So if I do that I'll get I equals E times n times a That is the cross sectional area of this conductor times V D and that V D. I'm going to substitute from here So that's going to be E times capital E divide by M Into tau Tau is the relaxation time. All right So we can go ahead and simplify that now That'll give me Let me write this and here then I get an E squared And I have my a Let me write. Yeah, okay. Then I have a I have my tau divided by M Sorry same color Times the electric field All right, so we have brought the current into the picture, but I need the voltage now I want to bring the voltage into the picture Voltage is basically the potential difference across this conductor But what I have is the electric field inside the conductor So I know that the battery creates an electric field from the positive terminal to the negative terminal So here is that electric field in this direction and that electric field. I know But can I calculate what the potential difference is from this electric field? Yeah, there is a connection between the field and potential difference Why don't you pause the video for a while and see if you can recollect that yourself All right, the electric field is the negative potential gradient. Let me just write that down over here electric field is the negative potential gradient and You know a lot of jargon's over here, but this basically means let me take an example to make a lot of sense See if I said the electric field was something like, you know 10 Units in this case units would be volt per meter. You can see newtons per coulomb is the usual Unit, but you can also say volts per coulomb volts per meter. So if the electric field was 10 volts per meter what this is saying is that if you travel along the electric field Every meter you're going down potential of 10 volt Okay, electric potential 10 volt. So 1 meter you go forward 10 volt you drop another meter you go forward another 10 volt It drops and the negative sign is basically saying that along the field Potential drops just like in gravity as you go down along the field the gravitational potential drops it decreases same concept over here Okay, so that is the connection between electric field and the and the potential difference. So in our case We know the potential difference across the conductor. Let's that itself is what we is so that potential difference We know is V and let's say the length of the conductor is L The length of this conductor is L and we're going to assume that this Electric field is pretty uniform and if we do that then we don't need the differential sign over here We can just say electric field has to be the potential difference divided by length in magnitude All I'm considering is in magnitude. Okay, these are all magnitudes. I'm not considering science over here And so if I plug that in I will now get What is this? I'll get N E squared times a Tao Divide by M Into E is V divided by L So the potential difference has now come into the picture and notice we're almost done We've gotten V is equal to IR form, right? We have I here and we have V over here and indeed current is proportional to voltage So this itself is the proof of Ohm's law and why is this happening? Why is current turning out to be proportional to voltage? It's coming out because of this expression It's all coming from here because electrons are traveling with a constant speed Drifting with a constant speed which is proportional to the strength of the electric field everything boils from there That's why I said this is the most important part of the derivation Now all we have to do is put this in a nice form over here So let me shift all of this on this side. So it's just gonna become the reciprocal and if we do that This is what we end up with you can just check. I just rearranged it So we have now the familiar form and so whatever is in the bracket Notice that's all a constant. It does not depend on voltage or current. This is the mass of the electrons charge on the electron relaxation time, which is depending on the temperature and the material something will speak about in the future videos and Is the number density again independent of these two and a length in the area the dimensions of the conductor So notice this whole thing is a constant and that's basically what we are going to call our resistance Resistance and so we have derived Ohm's law And so of course we'll talk about this expression in another video separately I don't want to rush it in this video, but one thing you can see you can get some insights now Where is this resistance coming from the resistance comes from the collisions of the electrons with the different different atoms? And you can see it from this formula. You see there's a tau in the denominator tau is the relaxation time, right? It's the time average time between successive collisions. Now imagine if there were no collisions at all Then tau would be infinity, right? If there are no collisions at all then the time for the next collision would be infinity So if there were no collisions tau would be infinity and if denominator was infinity this resistance would have been zero So you can now get this amazing thing right at the microscopic level. We are able to understand what causes resistance It's the collisions between the electrons and the atoms and so I guess to close the video I'd like to say one mind-boggling thing for me is we are used you're using Newtonian mechanics treating electrons as tiny Particles which you might know by now is not accurate for microscopic particles You are supposed to use quantum mechanics, but even then with these models and assumptions We are still able to get such a nice insight into what's really happening inside the conductor and we're able to derive Ohm's law And that's that's pretty amazing


Who has a word with Sonic Fox? Well, that was one hell of a series, but we have a request from Chat. They want to see one more match. Ladies and gentlemen, let's hear it one more time for Tweety. This will be our final pro exhibition. Tweety will be facing off against Sonic Fox. Any words before we start? I'm going to try to mop, but that mix looks kind of good, bro. It's a good mix. Go ahead and take a seat. We'll get you down to the button checks. That was quite a series against Rewind, but Sonic Fox, they're going to try to hold the title once again up here. Are you folks having a good time? We saw a lot of great gameplay. We saw a lot of great surprises. This is going to be the final piece of our live broadcast. We thank everybody for tuning in. We still got a little bit more left to go as we showcase Mortal Kombat 11. Tweety is going to get his lucky controller connected and jump into the button checks. Sonic Fox is going to check the mix up and get ready himself. Let's see he's going to choose the same character and what Tweety is going to bring to the mix. Here we go back into the menus and to the character select screen. Once again, these players will have time to check their inputs, make sure they're... Ooh, Tweety's going to double check something here. Need some help from Aquaman here. Thank you, Mr. Aquaman. So far we've seen Baraka, Sonya Blade, we've seen some Scorpion. I don't think we've seen any Sub-Zero yet. We've seen Raiden, we've seen some Scarlet, we've seen some Keras. I'd love to hear from you online, social media, which character is you most excited to see so far in Mortal Kombat 11? Looks like we have the connection. Tweety is sitting down and he's in the menu. Double checking the connection one more time. Looks like we're going to go into the main menu. Alright, we're going to give Tweety a couple more moments here to get his controller set up. Sonya Fox, I'm going to ask you real quick, how close was that rewind matchup for you? That was pretty close. If you didn't notice he tried to fatal blow me and I think I hit by that I would have died. I don't think fatal blows are armored, but I think they're quick. So what I did was check him just in case he tried to fatal blow me, I killed him. And why I have you here, what are your thoughts on the fatal blows compared to the X-Ray system that we saw in previous Mortal Kombat games? They're definitely a lot more useful now. And maybe not want to use X-Rays in the last game because most of them are useless and the main one is more important. But now that system exists, that's a big chunk of damage. Do you think there's going to be a lot of strategy for players going in where they want to use the fatal blow in the first round or save it for the second round and try to find out when is the best way to use it? I think the best way to use the fatal blow is if it's going to secure you the game, especially if you're making a full life combat. Well Sonya, thanks for your thoughts. We're going to give Tweety a couple more moments here. Let me kick it over to the commentary as we get this final matchup underway. Josh said that we haven't seen Sub-Zero yet. Yes. I saw a little bit of Sub-Zero in the back, but talk to me about how he is. Is he much different? Yeah, he almost is a weapons fighter in this game. He uses his ice swords and ice axes in a ton of his normal attacks. He has great range, good mix ups. He has a low that can combo and overhead that can combo. The overhead is unsafe, but still, very, very good. I heard that he doesn't have a move that he often has had in the past that has figured quite prominently in his game plan. Ice clone's gone. There's no ice clone. There is no ice clone. Somewhere on the East Coast. There is a certain player who has just died. It's frustrating. He actually does have a new move though that functions kind of similarly that you could check out. The people here will check out. He has an ice orb move that's very, very cool looking. It seems to have a similar idea. Maybe not the same function because you can attack under it and you can jump over a little more easily. That's one of his custom variation moves. If you want to make a defensive, heavily play style one, you can. Other than that move, I think he has a lot of zoning moves in this. He has multiple different projectiles he can use. He's very, very different. I think he's very cool. I've always liked Sub-Zero and I love playing him in this game. I feel like I've really been interested in him, but I really like some of the changes in him. One of a projectile character. It's cool. Tweety, of course, going back to the Baraka. It makes a lot of sense. He did really, really well. Now, this is a... Was she going for a throw? She was going for either a jab or a throw. Because that was an uppercut to beat a high attack, you got the crushing blow. Usually with an uppercut, you're just going to knock down. Off the crushing blow, you get a full combo. I said earlier that combos aren't as extensive as they used to be. Using that crushing blow, you're actually going to get like 40, even up to 50%, if you use the crushing blow. But once per game, so you've got to really make it count. Tried to get the second one. I think maybe if he hadn't enhanced that, he might have been able to recover in time, but it took the risk. It's sounding good for the re-stand. And so far, we haven't seen a lot of zoning. They're just going ham. They're just going in. Yeah, even Tweety hasn't really been zoning. He's had that many chances. This one on the stage actually has two different interactables. Oh, wake-up forward roll! How about that? Okay, so as an escape, not just the defensive sort of moving backwards to get out of the corner. To get out of the corner, right. Yeah, I think the wake-up roll is very, very strong. And as you were saying before, that's invincible to hits, but it can be grabbed. It can be grabbed, yes. And that includes command grabs. Baraka's command grab actually beats it, and that is the crushing blow requirement. Okay. Yeah, these guys are like on each other like blue, like they're the opposite zoning. Right. Okay, yeah, there's the wake-up. Getting a little juggle out of it. Fatal blow is ready. Sonic Fox mentioned we thought that... Okay! That's it. As an anti-air juggle from across the screen, all that damage. That is crazy. So much damage. The Sonic mentioned that crushing, sorry, Fatal Blow doesn't have armor. That is actually incorrect. That's what he said. It's that the armor doesn't start up immediately. Okay. You have to wait a little bit. But he is right that they're very, very fast. The into attacks that lead to a Fatal Blow are very, very strong. You can see it looks like Tweety's trying to find some ways to back up, get back, start the zoning again. Right. It's been hard for him. Oh! Good pre-emptive jump attack. That's injustice fundamentals right there. And I love that Baraka has the classic in K2 drop kick. Yeah. That's exactly that. Randy Orton, Bob Holly drop kick. But jump attacks do work a little bit differently. For example, neutral jump punches don't launch in the way that they've done in the last couple of games. Yes, they now are the same. Scorpion actually has a variation move he could equip that gives him the old school like volleyball balance thing if he wants. Oh, it didn't kill. Yeah, Sonic knew it. Sonic knew it. Very good blocks of Sonic. Really could have used a flawless block, I guess. He's gotten the corner.  Nope, he's not going to have to. I like it, rolls away. This is relentless right now. Sonic Fox is making everything happen. Didn't expect to hit. Oh, it's just a kick though. So no bigger combo out of it. Now we see the zoning. Now Tweety isn't doing exactly what he wanted to do. Yeah. Sonic's going to be in a lot of trouble. Her range isn't the best. She's going to have to either do her projectile back or kind of inch your way in. Well, here we go. She's got a knock down. Out of there. Very smart of Tweety. Again, injustice fundamentals there. Using that wall run to get out of dodge. Oh, he tried to go in. I said in an hour ago, no one has ever punished Chop Chop ever in 30 years. Well, you can keep it up. It's tricky. It is. You see, everyone says, oh, Chop Chop is a bad. He just punish it. It's bad. And no one does. Oh, wow. Blade scoop. That Baraka back four or two move is so quick. It's punishable, but that scoop is very, very fast. That's kind of like his MK9 blade charge, but it's significantly better. Man, that jump kick has really been causing Sonic Fox problems. You see him trying to anti-air it a couple of times. They both failed. Oh, wow. Excellent whip punish from Sonic. He goes to the restan. It goes for another mix-up. Both are in fatal blow. Here we scramble. Tried it, but again, because it was blocked, he still has it again. Yes, he will have it on a court. You'll see when it comes out. Nope, never mind. Not that it matters, but Sonic's going to be up 2-0. Very close games, though. Tweety's holding his own. Oh, yeah. I think Tweety needs to call in the air support and get starfire in here. Even though that projectile is a mid, the way that Sonic Fox moves through it is still practiced, seemingly. It's like he's already had experience there. What's scaring me right now is Sonic doesn't have his pause and he's still OD. Like, this isn't even his full form. He literally doesn't have his hands and he's still beating people. And they're both going all in again. Yeah, I mean, I don't know if anybody really knows what is advantage or not right now, right? That 4-2, sorry, that 4-4, that Sony A move is definitely one of her better mids. It's so fast that it's awesome to see Sonic That said punish! Already has figured out some of her great close-range moves even with just this limin' amount of time. Yeah. Wow, look at this. This is a clinic right now by Sonic Fox. He finishes it off. Oh my god, look at that. Look at that. I mean, it's reminding me of last time Immortal Kombat game came out and Sonic knew the game instantly, right? I mean, the way he's using back one is exactly what you want to do with her. He basically figured out Sony's fundamentals in like four minutes. Right. He just thinks so fast. We'll see though, Tweety has made these games competitive, so... Yeah, he's not getting, or hasn't been getting smoked, although you might say this game's a smoke. Excellent roll. Sonic's gonna reverse it and Tweety's in a ton of trouble here. Yeah, that roll was okay, but okay, here he goes. Got him. Now Sonic might be in favorable territory right now, where it's gonna be very close. Very, very close. Not quite, but still, if he finds the right hit, it's over. And now he is. And he did, and Sonic Fox ends up taking it in a sweep, three to zero. I think Sonic just lets Tweety know, look bud, this is MK. And when it comes to Mortal Kombat, I am the champ. I gotta tell you, I really enjoyed seeing the different styles that we saw among the characters. We saw that it was a slow kind of patient offense, mix-ups up close from Sonya. We saw very strong zoning at a couple of the characters. Scarlett, Baraka. That's right. We saw some cool command grab mix-ups, as well as some time-freezing stuff out of Garrus. I'm really liking what the variety is shaping up to be. There's only a few characters in there, but they're all quite different. And yeah.


And the short series by just as Viram Kumar, one goes, as they say, you can have a virtual feeling of the entire knowledge and you can hear him and the another series under the seeds of life law is also continuing where he pitches in his insights and the most fascinating part is that he has that deep knowledge that he can even say that there are deeper dives and these are to be required to be looked into by the various Supreme Court and the high courts on different aspects of law. And that's why we always say on this channel and otherwise also that these are the personal views and one may agree or disagree, but the interesting facet always in the law is that you evolve once you discuss. And that's why if we understand that the power of dissent, why it says that the power of dissenting in by the Supreme Court etc is there, that sometimes that trigger of the mindset actually helps to build the law which eventually is evolved to stay there. That what was evolved earlier is no longer hold to be good. And that's why they say that law is never stagnant. It continues to evolve and involve itself in a different aspects. Justice V. Ram Kumar as we all know that had retired from Kerala High Court and his passion for teaching or making the things think simple and simplified is always well known. The fact that it is so much cherished on the YouTube also shows this thing. And as we said that these are short topics today's cognizance in territorial jurisdiction. And I can say that he has conquered the territories of all hearts who are fascinated towards law. And people take cognizance of what he takes because they believe that what he's teaching and what he's sharing is knowledge. And as they say that he's always on a lot of webinars and otherwise also he says that I'm a student of law who keeps evolving because he believes that as a student you always learn. And the moment you think that you have become mastered that the only way is you can come down because the art of mastery involves that short skills and skills have to continue to evolve. I think that we have talked a lot on this but let's understand the deeper nuances of the cognizance in territorial jurisdiction. Let's hope and we all know that the cobwebs in the mines especially on the legal mines would be removed and we will be having much, much better clear insights and the haziness would also go to you sir. Thank you Mr. Vikas. Good evening friends. You rightly said Mr. Vikas that right to descent itself is a fundamental right. Therefore just because the Amkumar disagrees with the verdict of the Supreme Court or the High Court. There is no reason why everyone of the listeners, everyone of the viewers should also disagree. You have the right to take your own view. I am only applying the law as it is understood by me. Today we have a very important but short subject where it is a frequently asked question whether a magistrate having no territorial jurisdiction to try the case whether such a magistrate can take cognizance of the offense. See whether the power of taking cognizance is linked with the power of trial. That is our question today. Now if you go by the verdict of the Supreme Court in tries and chemical industry versus Rajesh Agarwal. AIR 1999 Supreme Court 3499 rendered by Justice Katie Thomas and Justice M. B. Shah. Justice Katie Thomas authoring the judgment. A magistrate taking cognizance of an offense need not necessarily have the jurisdiction to try the case as well. The apex court in that ruling observed that the provisions of sections 177 and 179 CRPC do not ramble the powers of the court to take cognizance of the offense. But with utmost respect, with the deepest respect for the bench, I have slight disagreement with the view. In fact, according to me, the above verdict overlooks a few sections, a few other important sections in this year. Namely sections 156-1, 157-1, 162-2, 169-170, 173-2-1, section 201 and 204 CRPC. We will take these sections one by one. See, section 156-1 CRPC declared that the territorial jurisdiction of the station house officer SHO is co-extensive with that of the appropriate court which is competent to try the offense. In fact, there is a verdict by, rendered by this humble self in TP Nandakumar versus state of Kerala, 2008 criminal law journal 298 wherein it was so declared. In fact, it was discovered, section 156-1, if you read, you will find that the power of the police station is co-extensive with that of the power of the competent court to try the offense. Now, if you go through chapter 13 of this CRPC, it decides which court shall conduct inquiry and trial in respect of an offense. And the first section, section 177 of chapter 13, declares that ordinarily it is the court within whose territorial limits the offense was committed which has to try the offense. So, if it is the court within the territorial limits of which the offense was committed, then the police station within the territorial limits where the offense was committed also should register the FIR, conduct the investigation, finally submit the charge sheet or final report, police report. Now, if you go to section 157-1, CRPC, it mandates that the SHO, after registering an FIR in respect of a cognizable offense, shall send a report of the same to the magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offense. That means there is a magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offense, which is actually, which will presently see that it is the magistrate empowered to try the offense, magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offense. That means it doesn't mean that any magistrate can take cognizance of an offense, there is a magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offense. Now, we pass on to section 162, clause 2, CRPC. See, there if you read section 162 clause 2, even when an accused person produced before the nearest magistrate under section 167-1, CRPC, can only give the first remand under section 167-2 CRPC. If such person is to be granted bail, then the nearest magistrate who is not the jurisdiction magistrate cannot grant bail. He has to forward the accused to the magistrate having jurisdiction, jurisdiction to do what, to try the case or to commit the accused for trial. So, when the non-jurisdictional magistrate, which is who is the nearest magistrate before whom an accused is produced after his arrest, then that magistrate can only remand him, first remand for 15 days maximum. Now, after that, before that, if he discovers that he does not have jurisdiction to try the case or commit the case for trial, he has to forward the accused to the magistrate having jurisdiction to try the accused or to commit him for trial. That is the declaration under section 162 to CRPC. Now, we come to section 169, 169 CRPC in a case where it appears to the station of investigating officer that there is no sufficient evidence for reasonable ground of suspicion that to justify the forwarding of the accused to a magistrate. That is after concluding, after concluding the investigation, he finds that there is no justification for forwarding the accused to the nearest magistrate for trial. Then the assertion shall, if the accused is in custody, release him on his executing a bond to appear when so required before a magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offense and try the accused or commit him for trial. Therefore, the investigating officer after conducting investigation finds that there is no case made out for trial of the accused. Then after taking a bond from him, he has to send the bond to the magistrate concerned and he has to tell the accused that I am releasing you. But in case of necessity, you may have to appear before the magistrate entitled to or empowered to take cognizance of the offense and try the accused, try you. You see the wordings of section 169. Likewise, section 170 clause 1, 170 clause 1 envisages a situation where after concluding the investigation, the magistrate finds that there is a case for placing the accused for trial before the magistrate. Then as soon as the investigation where you see the magistrate find that there is sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion, then the investigating officer shall forward the accused under custody to a magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offense and try the accused or commit him for trial. So he can also, even where the investigating officer decides to forward the accused to the magistrate for trial, he has to forward him to that magistrate who is empowered to take cognizance of an and try the accused or commit him for trial. And supposing it is a case punishable exclusively tribal by a court of session, then it cannot be straight away sent to the court of session. The magistrate competed to commit the case to the court of session will have to deal with the case. Therefore, the police officer will have to forward the accused to the magistrate empowered to commit the accused for trial before the court of session. In fact, that magistrate can grant bail also. He has the jurisdiction to grant bail except in a case falling under the two clauses 1 and 2 of section 49001 CRPC unless the case attracts the provisos 1 and 2 of section 49001 CRPC. We are not concerned with that for the time being. Then we come to section 1732 CRPC. 1732 clause 1 CRPC. As soon as investigation is completed, the S H O shall forward the match to the magistrate forward the accused to the magistrate empowered to take cognizance of an offense on a police report. A report in the form prescribed incorporating the details enumerated under section 1732 1 CRPC will also be that report will contain these matters. Therefore, after the investigation, if the investigating officer discovers that this is the case where he has to be taken, he has to be tried for the offense. Then he has to forward the accused along with the report with the accused in custody. Of course, there is another case law on that point. Accused to the magistrate empowered to try the accused or commit him for trial. Such magistrate alone can take cognizance of an offense, mind you. Then we come to another important section, section 201 CRPC. In the case of a private complaint also section 201 CRPC envisages a situation where a complaint is made to a magistrate who is not competent to take cognizance of an offense. Complaint is wrongly made to a magistrate who is not competent to take cognizance of an offense. There is a magistrate competent to take cognizance of an offense. If the complaint is in writing, section 201 CRPC A obliges the magistrate to return the complaint for presentation before the proper court. If the complaint is in writing, return complaint. If the complaint is an oral complaint, then section 201 CRPC B obliges the magistrate to direct the complaint, complainant to the proper court. Therefore, even in the case of a private complaint, the complaint is wrongly filed before a court, before a magistrate not entitled to take cognizance of an offense. The magistrate had to return the complaint or forward the complaint to the magistrate having jurisdiction. Then comes section 201 CRPC. It is the magistrate taking cognizance of an offense and who is entitled to form an opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding further in the matter who can issue summons or warrant as the case may be to the acute. Then section 204 thus also contemplates a situation where process to an acute can be issued only by magistrate having the jurisdiction to take cognizance of an offense. Going by section 177 CRPC, every offense shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by the court within whose local jurisdiction the offense was committed. Therefore, apart from section 177 CRPC, there are sections 178 to 188 CRPC which will also have to be referred to for deciding the jurisdiction of the court competent to conduct inquiry or trial. So to sum up, by summing up I would say it is only a magistrate who has the jurisdiction to take cognizance of an offense who can conduct an inquiry or trial as provided under chapter 13 CRPC. In tri-sense chemical industry that is AER 1999, Supreme Court 3499, if that is to be followed, then a magistrate of the first class in Cochin or in Trivandrum can take cognizance of an offense committed far away in Delhi, New Delhi. Supposing the offense is committed far away in New Delhi, a magistrate in Trivandrum or Kanyakumari in Tamil Nadu can take cognizance of an offense going by this ruling. But such a magistrate will not be the magistrate entitled to take cognizance of an offense and try the case within the meaning of the sections which we have referred to above. I am therefore the considered opinion that tri-sense chemical industry requires a reconsideration at the hands of a larger bench of the Supreme Court of India. Of course any of you is entitled to disagree with me, but this is what I find after applying these sections. The magistrate competent to take cognizance of an offense should be competent to try the offense as well. Otherwise, think of the situation of an offense committed in Chandigarh. Can a magistrate in Trivandrum take cognizance of an offense and who will try the case? Trivandrum magistrate, what all difficulties, what all language barrier is there? Officer cannot question, interrogate witnesses. All those difficulties will be there. That is why the code has very advisedly incorporated all these requirements in the respective sections. Therefore, in my humble opinion, that decision may require reconsideration. Thank you, brother. Thank you, friends. That's all for today. I have just received a message on the YouTube where Mr. Saini says I am a big fan of Justice B. Ramakumar. Another says I am watching this channel for the first time.   That's the power and as Justice Ramakumar said that once you start rubbing the brain and then the best of the things turn out, we hope and as he has rightly said it's not necessary what ideas he is dwelling upon not only in this session but otherwise also. That should be the law, the manner in which he thinks. But they say that it's always the best men can think alike and the best men can also differ. And that is the essence of law and we believe that it will continue to evolve. It's not as if those two judges are bad judges. They are great judges. They have contributed substantially to the progress of the criminal law in the country. But of course, anybody can commit mistakes. There can be an overstatement of the law knowingly or unknowingly. Certainly it is not with any oblique motive. They are laying down the law and think of the docket explosion before them. They also say that it is the nature of assistance also given. That also depends. Yes, they are all great judges. But I don't want to say that just because there is some overstatement of the law. They have laid down the law, bad law. No, it's not so. They are great judges. They have contributed their might to the development of the criminal law in the country. That's what we are saying. Even what we are saying may not actually be there. There can always be variation. The law may still cut into it. Exactly. I do confess that even I may be wrong. My view may be wrong. It is always what type of prism you are thinking and what type of manner you are thinking. Sometimes, sir, I am sharing with you. Sometimes you read a judgment with the head notes and you feel this is a judgment. Sometimes once that judgment is referred in some other judgment, then you realize that this is also a facet given in that particular judgment. Exactly. So that's what we say that we should always push the envelope of mind thinking and that's the way of evolving. Thank you everyone. Stay safe. Stay blessed.  We have asked him to also share knowledge on the Muslim law etc. There is a epitome of knowledge in different perspectives. Thank you. We will see the civilized version of Justice Ramadhan in that case. Let us see. Let us see. I am getting slowly civilized. Thank you sir.


The study aimed to assess if lower incisor proclination impacts the treatment outcome of class 2, division 1 malocclusions in children treated with functional appliances and evaluate the effectiveness of such treatment before and after adjustment for any proclination.


The other substantial obligation triggered by the internationally wrongful act and owed by the responsible state is, as article 31, paragraph 1 of Arsiewa recalls, I quote, the obligation to make full reparation for the injury caused by the internationally wrongful act. And of course, the duty to make reparation for the injury caused by the violation is probably the most obvious obligation under any regime of responsibility. It is also well established under international law, but it nevertheless deserves a few words of explanation. It is indeed important to understand what is an injury, what making reparation means, and what are the forms by which reparation can be achieved. And let me start with the notion of injury. Article 31, paragraph 2 of Arsiewa says that the injury includes any damage, whether material or moral, caused by the internationally wrongful act of a state. And of course, and this is all good and well, but it is important to realize that under damage, an injury is a legal construct despite its apparent materiality. It is a legal construct for two reasons. First, intrinsically, the injury must concern an interest of the state which is protected under international law. The injury must be about a legally protected interest, a legitimate interest under the law. Under international law, states have basically three legally protected interests. States have a legally protected interest to see their sovereignty respected, to see their property respected, and thirdly, to see that international law is respected in the person of their own nationals. States suffer an injury themselves when the rights of their own nationals are breached, and states may claim reparation in such a case, and doing so is called diplomatic protection and will revert to it later in the course. The injury can be actual or future in the sense that loss of profits can be claimed, provided of course that it is duly established, as required under article 36, paragraph 2 of Arsieois. Second, extrinsically, the damage is also a legal construct because it must be linked by a causal link to the internationally wrongful act. The damage must be caused by the violation, it must result from it. Causality under the law is not the same as material causality in natural sciences. Legal causality results from a human assessment. Domestic laws operate under different theories of causality, and because there are much fewer cases in international law, the theories developed in international law are less refined than in domestic law, but they all refer to the idea of a normal foreseeable cause of events, of proximate cause, and sometimes a difference is made between direct and indirect damage. But whatever the words used, they all express a judgment of reasonableness in the particular circumstances of a case. Human causality is no different from judging how far can humans be held accountable for their acts. And just one example to show you that causality under international law has very little to do with material causality in nature. After the Gulf War of 1991, the United Nations Security Council established a compensation commission called the United Nations Compensation Commission in order to allocate war reparations. Iraq was responsible to make reparations for all the damages resulting from its illegal invasion and occupation of Kuwait, and an important share of its all revenue was allocated to a special fund for that purpose. The UN Compensation Commission decided that the destructions that had been materially caused by the victorious armies that fought against Iraq to liberate Kuwait were to be compensated by Iraq. Those destructions were materially caused by the American, the French, the British or other Allied armies, not by the Iraqi army. Nevertheless, those damages were legally considered to be the result of the illegal invasion for which Iraq was responsible. The causal assessment was as follows. Had there been no illegal invasion, there would have been no Allied military reaction. And it was foreseeable for Iraq that such reaction would take place. And of course, because those destructions were legitimate acts of war, if Iraq did not have to pay for them, no one would bear responsibility and the victims would never be compensated. After the Second World War, exactly the same causal assessment was made by various conciliation commissions. Let us turn now to what making reparation means. In a famous case between Germany and Poland about a factory at Czorzów, the Permanent Court of International Justice famously stated that, I quote, Reparation must, as far as possible, wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and re-establish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed. And of course, from this dictum it is important to realize that reparation is not about re-establishing the situation which had existed just before the violation occurred. Reparation is not about the status quo ante. Rather, reparation is about re-establishing the situation which would, in all probability, have existed now without the violation. Because reparation is about wiping out all the consequences of the wrongful act, it must aim at establishing at the very moment when reparation is made, establishing the situation which would, in all probability, have existed had the wrongful act not been committed. How can this be achieved? What are the forms of reparation? Under customary international law, and as recalled by article 34 of Arsiois, I quote, Full reparation for the injury caused by the internationally wrongful act shall take the form of restitution, compensation and satisfaction, either singly or in combination. And of course, the three forms of reparation are restitution, compensation and satisfaction. Depending on the nature and extent of the injury, they may be owed singly or in combination in order to achieve reparation. That is to establish the situation which in all likelihood would have existed if the violation had not occurred. Let us turn to each of those forms now, forms of reparation in the next reading.


Many times people are lost trying to find themselves.  The wife looked out of the window says yes, he did. He says put him on the phone. I need directions Andrew Carnegie in 1904 started a fund called heroes fund where Anyone who risks their life to save someone will be rewarded either with a scholarship financial benefits And they receive this particular medal and ever since 1904 9893 so around 10,000 medals have been given to people who risked their lives to save others Just this year alone 72 medals have been given to these people and about 39 million dollars have been spent to help these heroes That's not Andrew Carnegie There was another image there You don't have it. It didn't make it to the email. Okay It's a rich guy with the poster. Okay We are in a generation that is obsessed with these guys The super heroes, right? You know these movies they make bank They make TV series out of them the comics and there is a there's an inner drive within each one of us to be a hero a Hero is not someone who goes to Olympics, you know and jumps really high runs really fast Even though some of them become heroes because they overcome challenges to get to that point But the the real hero that we're gonna talk about today is people who spend their life To rescue others. I'm gonna just mention to you few found them online and found the really encouraging Nicholas Winston in 1938 he saved 600 kids He was in Czechoslovakia and what he did is he put these kids personally on the train and Send them out to UK So about 600 kids because they were about to be deported and to be you know killed in Consecration camps eventually they calculated that just within about 50 or something years There's 5,000 people that came out of descendants of these 600 kids that were rescued because of this man The interesting part is no one knew about this for about 50 years He even hid it from his wife, so she doesn't report him to the authorities his wife Unaccident found this out by cleaning up an attic and found out receipts and found out pictures of the children that he saved 600 of them He's a hero Now is Bolin now most of you will not think of him as a hero in this sense But this man is the one that invented Ejected seat, you know like in the airplanes when something's wrong with the airplane and the seat ejects and you know They have the parachute so he is the inventor of that He made money big money for it for creating that kind of a seat until one day Volvo They hired him as many many years ago to work for some of their some of the other departments And this is the man that invented something we use every single day or should be using that saved Millions of people has been estimated he invented a seat belt There's been no seat belt out of this up to that point and what he did is he says for Volvo He says I don't want to just make more money He says I want to invent something that will be able to change people's lives even after I die today I see belt you don't even have a car without a seat belt But this is the man that invented and said no he didn't risk his life He just leveraged his wisdom and his intelligence to be able to affect the humanity and to save people's lives James Harrison He saved two million lives from the blood. He donated. It's very interesting This guy has a very rare thing in his blood that actually helps to fight disease and For all his life. He has when to donate his blood 1,000 times and they calculated from the donating of his blood Two million people have been dead today if he wouldn't donate his blood So one man donates his intelligence the other man He donates his blood a one man. He just donates his opportunities and he saves other people Edward Jenner he invented the first vaccine and defeated the smallpox in 18th century in 18th century alone in Europe 400 million people died from this disease and this man invented a vaccine We all know a guy named Joseph in the Bible and because of the wisdom God gave him he saved not only Egypt But he saved the world we know the Queen a lady who became very popular because of her looks But she used her looks not just to become the beautiful woman that the missus, you know Babylon She leveraged her beauty to rescue an ethnic group of Hebrews and today a book is written in her name Movies are created in her name not because she was cute But because she used her beauty to leverage as a leverage to save other people We were created Within us with the desire to save people Whether it's a guy in Oregon when the shooting started in the library He goes in and tackles the shooter and risks his life Get shot but rescues other people from being shot or three guys who went to a movie theater with their girlfriends And the shooter opened fire and they shielded their girlfriends by themselves getting shot and getting killed Or if it's a person that's 72 years 72 years old and he is retired And he drives by a house that is on fire and instead of just calling firefighters He runs into the upstairs and he finds there's a 77 year old girl That is that is there and he rescues her and himself gets admitted to coma because of the fire burns He receives within us whether you're Christian or not is Within us there is that thing when the danger comes in We run to help a Studies been done in Germany where they took 18 year old 18 month old toddlers and they found out that when a parent goes in and does not have enough To to their hands are full and they need to open a cabin a kid Will hold a toy and it will drop a toy Just to help their parent open the cabin. It's within children It's within adults God wired you because he made you in his image and likeness to save others To help others amen and Jesus demonstrated that to us the story that really touched me Now it's been made into a movie called sully. It's about a captain the pilot You see his picture on January 19 and January 15 2009 flight 1549 from New York had this captain had about a hundred fifty-five people that was on this flight and as they were taking off large group of birds large birds they hit that flight and They hit that engines and both of the engines they collapsed and so this captain who was a you know a veteran Captain he Was very experienced. They said there was no one else at that time who could have been better to handle that situation than him He knew he couldn't be able to get back on the on the airstrip He wouldn't be able to go to the nearby airport and he makes the very unthinkable decision crazy decision to lend the plane in the Hudson River You have to understand he says when I made a decision to lend the plane in the Hudson River He says I remembered a flight Ethiopian flight that landed in the ocean and When you lend a plane and I'm not a pilot so don't but I listen to a lot of stuff on pilots And I found out is that when you lend a plane in the river or in the lake One small little thing when your wings are not straight and it flips the plane out And it destroys the whole plane in pieces.  There is a clip that 60 minutes did where He talked to those people for a few minutes and what they said I don't want you to watch this clip before we actually go into the message So if you can go ahead and turn on the clip your eyes on the screen And these are the people that he is reconnecting with who were on that flight Family together More than one woman Came up to me and said thank you for not making me a widow Thank you for Allowing my three-year-old son to have a father Wow unbelievable one man Had told me that you know I was looking at him He was in first class and he seemed to be very anxious and I just told him just you know be calm and You know just try to breathe Look at me and see tell him everything's gonna be fine. Thank you again He showed me a picture of himself with his niece and the niece was a child of his brother who was killed in 9-11 and he told me he didn't think that his family could take losing a second son It's a miracle 155 is a number But when you can put faces to it and not just the hundred and fifty-five faces, but the The other faces the wives the daughters the sons fathers the mothers the brothers You know it's it gets to be a pretty big number pretty quickly Captain Sullenberger says he plans to fly again, but he's not sure when For now he and his family are finding comfort going through the mountain of mail He's received from all over the world dear captain Sullenberger In a world that seems to be full of bad news It was such a wonderful day on January 15th think about not only the 155 passengers, but all the families who belong to these people dearest captain Sullenberger big apple hero Yesterday I received a voicemail from my 84 year old father who lives on the 30th floor of a building with river views here in Manhattan had you not been so skilled my father or others like him in their sky-high buildings Could have perished along with your passengers had not you landed in the river as you had as a Holocaust survivor My father taught me that to save a life is to save a world as you never know What the person you've saved nor his or her prodigy will go on to contribute to the peace and healing of the world Bless your dear captain Sullenberger. New York loves you That is my favorite one Yeah, mine too You've been called a hero by a lot of people How do you feel about that I? Don't feel comfortable embracing it, but I don't want to deny it I don't want to diminish their thankful feeling toward me by telling them that they're wrong I'm beginning to understand why they might feel that way and why is that? Something about this episode has captured people's imagination. I think they want good news I think they want to feel hopeful again, and if I can help in that way, I'm going to read from the scriptures second Kings chapter 7 verse 9 And as I've mentioned these stories and you may say that well, you know a lot of these are not necessarily biblical stories But the story I'm gonna read to you is very similar to exactly stories as such Except the people who are heroes in the stories were not pilots They were not beauty queens They were not inventors and they were not brave people who ran to rescue people from the fire these Heroes were least likely to be heroes. They were lepers and They not only saved their life They saved the life of entire city and they said to one another We are not doing right this day is the day of good news and we remain silent If we wait until morning light some punishment will come upon us Now therefore come let us go and tell the king's household We know the background of the story is the city of Samaria was besieged by this particular enemy They ran out of food people started to die things became so severe and so hard and difficult that people started to eat their own children This is when you know that the situation has already become not bad. It's become Unbelievably bad. There were four lepers outside of the city and these four lepers they also ran out of food and The leprosy is a they call it henshin Henshin disease is a skin disease this particular disease You know, we don't see much of the leprosy in the United States actually the statistics that there's about 67 You know cases over have severe severe leprosy in the United States a lot of the skin diseases They're very treatable and some of it is not noticeable to the public But this skin disease caused them to be outside of the whole city and they were outside and they were there dying Not because of a disease but because of starvation. It's interesting that They were sick But it's not what was killing them Leprosy as dangerous as it is as terrible as it is. It wasn't deadly. What was deadly is their hunger and They were looking for a solution Not for the leprosy they were looking for a solution for something more important than leprosy at that moment It was their hunger We have many people in our city today who are are like like lepers Maybe they have different problems and different challenges But the biggest need people have is not to fix their temporary problem It's to fix the spiritual problem that deadliest need is sin The deadliest problem is our is our separation from God Not just our poverty not just even our sickness or not even tormenting thoughts that we have or suicidal Tendencies and all of these things these things are important But the deadliest problem that humanity has that people in our city have is the fact that their sinners and Jesus Christ Is the only one that's the solution as these lepers they were not looking for healing They were looking for something that was more important for them at this point Is they were looking for their salvation and they go into the enemy's camp and when they found their bread over there They found the help over there then they got so full that they started to bring into their own tents and Fill their tents and something click inside of them says this is not right what we do We need to go and tell others that we found this otherwise a punishment will come upon us The greatest need that humanity has is not to get married. It's not to even get money It's not to even get health the greatest need is to have a relationship with God because somebody say amen Is to have their sin be dealt with by the cross of Jesus Christ You can be a sick person or you can be a healthy person You can be in Samaria who don't have leprosy or outside of Samaria who have leprosy But both of the camps had a deadly problem People who are in the hospitals and people who live in the mansions in tri-cities Without Jesus Christ, we have a deadly problem and Jesus Christ is the only one who can answer the problem who can change the problem and we see what these lepers did And I want to share with you just three simple tips on how to be more effective in sharing your faith one is They shared or they explained what they experienced lepers Went into the city and told the city What they've tasted They told the city not that the city is dying they didn't come to the city and say well you guys rejected us You threw us out.  You know what you deserve that They came into the city. They didn't debate. They didn't tell them about the world world hunger They didn't tell them about the chemicals of bread and how important food is to a human body They came to a city and they say guys we have ate some food It's right there and y'all can have that food as well Jesus didn't call us to be lawyers. He called us to be witnesses Witnesses do not debate. They do not persuade. They do not try to defend Witnesses only share what they've seen and what they've experienced God anoints us to be witnesses not to be lawyers. Our goal is to win souls not to win arguments Many Christians we have to know our faith. We have to know what we believe We have to know the difference between Islam and Buddhism and Hinduism and atheism We have to know why and what we believe in but we must understand a person with an argument It's not the person who's gonna win It's the person who has an experience is the person who's gonna win if you ask people who did drugs They never went to a school to learn how to spread the ministry of drugs What did they do they got high and they liked it and They went to someone and they said do you want to feel better? Yes. Well, this is what you try It's illegal. It's dangerous. It's addictive But there was something about experience that makes you this person with influence makes you the person who can Influence others faster than the person who just has basic knowledge about a product or about a thing.  It's only a salesman And a lot of times that's exactly how it is. We feel like we're just people who are like sales people We're just trying to tell people say hey, you really really need Jesus But if you tasted him if you experienced him you only need to open up your mouth and say like the blind man I was blind now. I see you do whatever you want with that But this is what happened to me people will never argue with your experience Can somebody say amen? We must understand the most effective witnesses are not those who the most educated They're the people who had an experience and that's why our desire for the church is not to create a church where people get Information where people get a revelation where people get an experience where people experience demons coming out What they experience sickness leaving what they experience their life changing and only people with experience become the best witnesses in our community a Woman at the well like Martin mentioned today. She was a broken person. She did not know the prophecies She went into the city and said the man I met knows everything about me There was an experience that she had that experience was so compelling that the whole city Especially men all came out to see that man You are most effective in your witness not when you use the knowledge you have but when you use the Experience you had with the Lord to bring to other people to say listen. This is what happened to me And the same can happen to you. That's why the Holy Spirit came to make us witnesses How can you make a witness? You learn to witness no what that means Holy Spirit came to give you experiences to witness about The Holy Spirit wasn't sent to send you to seminary He was sent to send you into an experience that when you have something to say you come from your own Experience now we have people here today who you know who maybe lived right all their life You didn't do anything bad. You don't have to do bad to always have a testimony You can have a testimony because of the Holy Spirit not because of the sin that you did our brother who shared the testimony today It wasn't the drugs they gave him to testimony It was the Holy Spirit that gave him the testimony and many people say well, you know I need to go and really do bad stuff to have something to testify I know people who are buried in our Cemetery in tri-cities who believed in that the drugs don't give you a testimony Holy Spirit gives you a testimony Seek the Holy Spirit and you will have a testimony because somebody say amen And the Holy Spirit can give you a testimony of how he uses you to touch other people Not just even your own life, but the first point that we learn we cannot be effective witnesses if we don't have an experience Most of us here we have an experience of experience of someone else use your experience The guy who invented a seatbelt used his knowledge a Guy who invented the vaccine he used his used his knowledge, you know, we see that this captain He used his knowledge. He used his experience in flying God wants to anoint you to use your experience to touch other people's lives People who say I can't tell anybody about Jesus. I don't I can't invite. I haven't invited anybody It's because you don't use your experience use what you've tasted and the Bible says the Lord is good Taste and see the Lord is good. The Bible says that we know that he is good When we taste of his goodness when we taste to what he's done in our life and we begin to share that Something begins to happen. We draw and captivate people number two the city needs a good news The city needs a good news Leppers came to the city and they brought the city a good news. I liked what the video said. He says people today need a good news People are tired Everything I have a little app on my phone. It's called the news There was no news. It's only Hillary Clinton That's all I cannot wait till elections are done But then after that there's gonna be someone else. It's always some kind of a drama It's always Brad Pitt is divorcing or Julej is divorcing Brad Pitt. It's always this this drama You listen to that and you're like Lord Jesus. I'm no wonder people live longer before they didn't know this stuff They were disconnected their life or more peaceful. They looked at their own life and they build their own life That is not the news people in the city. They need a good news They don't need just the news.  That's not a news They know that It's like a person who you know, there was a one church and the devil came into the church They will took the pulpit everybody ran from the church except one woman in the front the devil looked at her He says aren't you scared of me? She said no, so why aren't you scared of me?  You don't need to tell people obvious Most people they they know they're going to help because they're living in one Leppers did not come to the city say guys you're gonna die. It was obvious. They're gonna die the lepers came to a city with the good news We are a good news church Yes Sin separates us from God, but that's not the gospel That is only the introduction to the gospel the gospel is Jesus Christ dealt with the sin The gospel is the Jesus Christ heals the gospel is Jesus Christ delivers the gospel is Jesus Christ Restores the gospel is a good news and the cities need a good news The cities are open to the good news can somebody shout amen You can win one or two people by scaring them, but to win a multitude is gonna take a good news Look at all the crusades in the world where the most people getting saved you will see one common denominator People there get healed and people there get delivered people are offered a good news Not just a lecture on their human depravity They're offered a message that answers the needs of people and that captivates masses Masses are not captivated by condemnation by putting people down They are captivated by the message of salvation and the message of hope and that is the message you have and I have in our Arsenal don't walk around your city condemning people Don't walk around your city putting people down you said, but if I don't tell them they're going to hell You know, they need to know that's not the gospel the gospel is the good news of Jesus Christ The gospel is the good news of Jesus Christ.  How many people have you slept with? Well now you have the answer God just gave you the answer That's why you're gonna die of that disease that is not the message Jesus wants you to bring When Jesus met the woman at the well, he knew everything about her messed up life He didn't give her a lecture on relationships. He didn't tell her your you Do you know that your life is you have a generational curse in your life? He brought one positive thing about her He says you know what she just lied that she did not have a man. He says but you said the truth She lied 98% is 1% 2% and she said the truth that she wasn't married. He says, you know what you're right You actually said something very good. You said the truth. You don't have a husband Jesus always lifted people not brought him down to impact the cities our tongue has to be filled with positive news Not negative news our tongue has to be filled with the good news not a bad news Our tongue has to bring healing hope and restoration not negativity and bringing people down and the Holy Spirit will use that to impact people It's somebody say amen Just few weeks ago. There was a gentleman who came to our church and he I guess when playing a game he he there was there was a part that was broken in his in his arm And we'll hear his testimony Hopeful the next Sunday and so when on Wednesday and he wasn't even saved on Wednesday when God touched him and healed him He experienced healing in his body and now he's able to work without any pain He'd been to the doctor they they couldn't find any problem and last Sunday when he was here with us He gave his life to Jesus Christ and when they asked him what was the reason why did you give your life to Jesus Christ? He says Jesus touched me He healed me and then I gave him my life to Jesus the Bible says the goodness of God It's meant to repentance the goodness of God is meant to change God is good And he wants to be good to people and we are the messengers of that goodness can somebody say amen number three Don't let your problems to stop you from fulfilling your mission These guys don't let your problem trump your purpose. You know these guys. They were lepers They were rejected and when they went to the city, they were skeptical People looked at them and I said wouldn't believe that you're bringing a good news your trap But they did not allow the fact they had no influence with the city They didn't allow the fact that they were rejected. They didn't allow the fact that they were not famous They were nobody's they were lepers They were not educated, but their leprosy didn't stop them from going and telling high officials guys You can find bread a lot of us feel intimidated by people who are more educated than us Some people feel intimidated to witness or to tell your manager or your boss about Jesus Many of us we feel intimidated we only tell people quote-unquote lower than us means people working for us or people Looking up at us and saying well you're a great guy and then we feel like well now. I am in a great position. These guys were lepers They had no influence over anybody But see they had an urgency inside of them that was bigger than the lack of influence that they had and they had the sense That if we don't tell anybody we're gonna get punished meaning we're gonna we're gonna be we're gonna be guilty We gotta do something about it and it's interesting they They could have said well when our leprosy is gone We're gonna tell everyone that we got food and we got healing they said if we already found food We're gonna go tell everybody about the food and we're gonna trust God he'll take care of the leprosy Don't let the problem you still have to stop you from bringing other people to Jesus Because Jesus has dealt with your issue of sin that gives you the right to start witnessing Even if your finances are still not in order yet Even if your family is still not there where it's supposed to be if you're a leper don't feel like well my leprosy Disqualifies me from being a hero from being a savior. That is not true.  He says on you and your descendants forever and The Jewish some of the Jewish history says or the Jewish tale. I would say better Jewish tale says that Gehazi he was expelled from the city with his three sons and they were outside during that time We see that the reason why is because in Kings chapter 5 Gehazi gets the sickness in Kings chapter 8 Gehazi is standing in front of a king Which we know the lepers cannot stand in front of other people especially in front of the king so Elisha's dead in Kings chapter 8 and Gehazi is standing in front of the king and tells the king about the good things that God has done And so this is what the Jewish tale says is that these four guys these four lepers were actually Gehazi and his three sons The reason he got the leprosy was because of his selfishness and when he was taking taking taking taking Something click inside the reason I am a leper is because I'm selfish and he says I can't do this anymore And he says I'm gonna go tell the city and when he goes in and tells the city This is what the tale says is that God supernaturally healed him of the very disease he got by selfishness And that's how he was able to stand in front of the king Now whether that's true or not once we get to heaven we'll ask him But the truth is this if you minister to people Even if you still have an issue God takes his possibility for that issue and begins to fix that issue When you take God's problem and make him your problem God takes your problem and makes it his problem When you become like jihazaphat who said God I'm gonna seek your kingdom and when the enemy comes against him God comes to jihazaphat and says this battle is my battle. It's no longer your battle. I'm gonna fight for you See we all want those promises, but those promises are not handed over to just anybody God gives those promises to people who take the position and take his problem upon himself Be the person who takes God's problem by bringing people to jesus Fishing for people looking for people making people who come to church who are first time guests feeling making them feel special Not just being around your own circle of friends Inviting those at your workplace that you have influence with and those you don't have influence with I remember a story that has marked my life for for a very long part of my life and it's a guy named jason He was coming to our church For actually quite some time and then reconciling to his wife. He they moved to another church in town and jason Was a drug addict He was addicted to drugs and he will also also addicted to alcohol At one particular time jason's life was touched by god and he was admitted to a rehab mountain ministries in a little bit over there in By seattle area he went to that rehab for first year The rehab had two programs first year and in the second year During the first year his life got on his feet. Everything was going great And at the end of the first term His son gets diagnosed with a hole in his heart And so they were about to put him to surgeries and and all kinds of things that they said that his son might die And jason ends the first year and his wife calls him back his ex-wife calls him back says hey, you're done with the program come home And jason says I really want to stay one more year to really get confirmed in my freedom So when I come home, I come back as a completely changed man instead of a man Who is still going to be prone to going back to drugs His wife Complained a family said what kind of a father are you?  He says if I come back and I'm not fully free He says how can I live with myself? What kind of a father am I then? He stayed for one more year He put what god wanted more than even his personal screaming present situation Within that year all the stuff with his son worked out so good The hole was gone. Everything was fixed. He came back from that rehab and now it's been over 15 years Jason never slipped back and his son and the other child they have a father that is completely different man that was 16 years ago Around the same time There was a young man who was visiting our church Who kept slipping back into drugs and alcohol going back and forth? And he just got his first child And now remember me and ilia consulting that young man and says listen We'll drive you to the same place. We know the people in that rehab You don't have to pay anything because your grandpa his grandpa spent 90 thousand dollars Cashed out of his retirement cashed out the equity out of his house to put him through all kinds of rehabs and nothing worked That's like listen go to that place For two years in two years who passed like this and after two years I'm like listen you'll be a great father to your newborn baby And the young man said you don't understand ilia wasn't a father at the time and I wasn't and he said He says you guys are not fathers.  It's the most important thing And she deserves me I remember I told him she doesn't deserve a drug addict She doesn't deserve an alcoholic Yes, he was without drugs for about four months because of her Eventually he snapped back back into it got a second child We talked him against it. Please take a break. Please put your present screaming problem on the side put god first He said no, this is more important I need to fix this first And he was trying to be there with his family, but he wasn't capable of being with his family.  God will take care of your family. God will take care of your marriage God will take care of your health put what matters to god as number one in your life And I'm not saying ignore those things but put those in the hands of god I say god you put your problem in my hands.  We've come to a time right now where I want us to pray for for this very thing We're gonna pray for samaria We're gonna pray our samaria is richland. Ken we can pasco Our samaria is the thousands of people that will be watching us online Our samaria is literally hundreds of thousands every week who watch our tv show that goes in on the impact tv Our samaria is 800,000 potential viewers that watch us on radion light and charter communications Our samaria is all the parents they get touched by people who go in with the yogi bear on Thursday night Our samaria is the people who get impacted on Saturday morning when people gather to go witnessing into the mall and into the fresh market Our samaria is everyone you come in contact with every single day at your work at your gym At the grocery shop or at the coffee shop our samaria is every place I go into preach next week It's gonna be in vancouver two weeks. So now it's gonna be in in everett our samaria Is every video that gets posted on youtube and gets watched in uk in malaysia In all kinds of other countries that we give replies back our samaria is social media Our samaria is all of those venues that is open right now. What we want to present and offer Is not just religious material but life Thing that brings healing to people and we want to be light to the world Not just a religious bumper sticker as salt means we make a difference in the place we go into We have a testimony because of what god has done and trudaki does it in other people's lives And we want to see every home group be filled with new people that are saved Every youth service be filled with new people that are saved every sunday service be filled with new people that are saved That's why morning prayers exist. That's why first week of the month You know, we take three days to fast not just to lose weight and get on a christian diet But to see god move mightily to save people's lives Here and outside here and outside in jesus mighty name can somebody say amen