The narcissist doesn't get over you, they don't return to their usual state of health or happiness after having a bad or unusual experience with you, they don't overcome their problems and difficulties before the narcissist even met you, they already had a lot of emotional baggage from their childhood or past relationships and that was what they brought into their relationship with you, that is why things turned out in the way that they did because from what they've learned, they think that's how you're supposed to treat people, they think it's okay and they want you to think that they've moved on and they're so much happier without you they want everyone to think that you were the problem and it's just not true, the narcissist doesn't get over you, they want you to think that they do in most situations the narcissist will act like they got over you overnight even if they were with you for years they've been gaslighting you for such a long period of time that you no longer trust yourself you no longer trust your own perceptions, you're willing to believe anything they tell you because they have trained you to trust their validation so even if it's been one day and they tell you they've moved on and they're happy without you you might believe it because you don't trust your own intuition but just think about that for a moment if you have been with someone for years, are you really going to be able to get over them overnight? does that sound probable or realistic? even though the narcissist may be cold hearted even though they may lack affection and warmth they may lack care and consideration for you it doesn't mean that they will be able to get over you that quickly the narcissist is obsessive by nature they are very possessive and controlling they are addicted to the conveniences you provide to them they are addicted to how you make them feel they're like junkies and that is why they could never leave you alone that is why they used up so much of your time and energy so they're not just going to forget about you that quickly the narcissist cannot give up their addiction without serious withdrawal symptoms the narcissist doesn't get over you they will try to make it look like they have but the fact that they do this so quickly should give it away to you it should make you realize that it's not real because it takes time to move on they jump from one person to the next because for a moment it helps to suppress what they're really feeling but it never goes away which is why the narcissist can often seem so bitter and resentful after the discard they will often try to take revenge on you they will enforce flying monkeys and start a smear campaign against you and yet at the same time they expect you to believe that they've moved on and they're happy well that's just not something a happy person would do the truth is they're still attached to you and they can't let go in many cases they believe their own lies they've tricked themselves into thinking that you did them wrong or that you didn't do enough of them and they want you to think that it doesn't bother them they want you to think that they've moved on and they're so much happier without you but the fact that they're making all of this effort to get you to see them in this light should be a red flag to you because if they were really happy you would never see them again they wouldn't be talking to people about you you would never hear anything about them they wouldn't keep popping up in your life they would just leave you alone the reason why they keep coming back is because they're still attached to you they're still bothered by the thought of you moving on and being happy without them and actually they think that you are happy without them they think that your life is so much better without them which is why they are trying to portray this image to you they may even try to cut you down and act like what you're doing isn't that great because in their minds everything is either black or white you're either a winner or a loser and if they see that you're winning in life then they must be the losers narcissists are very good at perception management they are good at altering your perceptions they know how to plan and coordinate the elements of a situation to produce the desired effect they know how to change the way you think or feel about a person's situational event just remember when you first met them when they love bombed you they gave you a mistaken impression they deliberately caused you to believe something that was not true for their own personal gain they promoted a belief concept or idea that was not true they deceived you they tricked you by using dishonest behaviour and then they secured you as their source of supply and what they're doing now is no different they're just fooling someone else and they're trying to fool you it serves two purposes they're trying to hurt you by making you think that they're happy with someone else when really they're just using that person and the new person is either too naive to figure that out or maybe they're just using the narcissist too the narcissist is an illusionist they perform tricks that deceive the eye they make you believe in things that aren't true or real so that they can get the reaction they want from you so they can feel comfortable by knowing that you are also miserable misery loves company and that is why they will try to make you feel miserable just like them by using these tricks and lies it may look like the narcissist has moved on and they're so much happier without you but this couldn't be further from the truth narcissists lack emotional depth they lack the ability to experience real happiness the only time it can even seem like they're enjoying something is when they entertain another delusional grandiose fantasy something that has no basis in reality they can't appreciate the things that really matter in life and even when they are in their little fantasy world it doesn't take much to take them out of it any slight faults or flaws they see in themselves or other people it's enough to remind them that they're still in reality it's enough to make them angry or upset the narcissist will shift through a range of different emotions from one moment to the next they cannot experience consistent happiness and even then it's not real happiness they lack emotional depth they lack the ability to experience real happiness but they want you to think that they're with someone else and they're happy without you they want to hurt you because then that gives them supply it makes them feel better about themselves but that's really the only thing that does make them feel good when they hurt other people when they make them feel bad that's their idea of fun they can't have fun without treating people that way because they don't feel good about themselves so they have to put people down they have to hurt you but even then it's very shallow because they lack emotional depth they don't get to experience the level of happiness that we do because that comes from within it doesn't come from material items or other people and there's nothing within a narcissist they're just an empty void which is why they always needed so much attention from you which is why when it's over they always try to hurt you they're trying to fill themselves up but they can never be filled they can never feel satisfied because they lack emotional depth nothing is ever good enough for them and that is why they left in the first place not because we weren't good enough but because they cannot be satisfied with anything and that is why even when it seems like they found this perfect supply they will always find a way to come back to you they will always find a way to pop up in your life again the discard phase is an illusion they're not happy they never were the only thing that makes these people feel better about themselves is knowing that you can't move on without them knowing that you're still hurting and that is why they will do whatever it takes to hurt you they will try to make you think that they moved on at the drop of a hat they don't care about the truth and reality of the situation they don't want you to know what's really going on with them they don't want to give you the satisfaction but the truth is they are miserable they are struggling and they're thinking that you've got it so much better than they have which is why they're constantly trying to hurt you which is why they're constantly trying to bring you down to their level but you should not entertain things that are beneath you you have to keep moving forward and leave the trash where it belongs get yourself out there and continue along your journey continue on your destined path and purpose and know that sometimes God doesn't always give you what you want because he has something so much better waiting for you thank you for watching I hope this video ends with you please like, comment, share and subscribe click the bell icon to receive notifications for my future videos check out the new Narc Survival website at www.narcsurvival.uk we can read my blog posts, book coaching sessions and join our support forum if you would like to donate, my PayPal link is in the video description coaching inquiries, you can email me at coaching.narcsurvival.uk thank you for watching and I'll talk to you soon


So, we will continue our discussion on relationship between different economic variables given a quantification or through different methods graph or the mathematical equation. So, if you remember in the last class we have started discussion about the derivative of various function, how to solve the various function then we introduce the optimization technique where we did two type of optimization one is the maximization of revenue or maximization of profit and second one is the maximization of the revenue or maximization of the profit and second one is the minimization of the cost. So, whenever we are doing this optimization technique either it is a maximization or it is a minimization problem we did not consider the case of a constraint and we just optimize the maximization of a profit function or we just optimize the minimization of a cost function. So, today we will discuss the optimization technique with a constraint either in the form of the income or in the form of the cost when it comes to rec cost and when it comes to the revenue either it is maximization or it is a minimization of the cost. So, in case of constraint optimization this is a technique used for achieving a target under constraint situation or condition is called constraint optimization. So, maybe the motivation for optimization is remain same achieving a target either to maximize the profit or to minimize the cost, but here the difference is that there is a constraint along with the objective function and how to do this constraint optimization we generally discussed two type of technology we will talk about the substitution technique and later on we will take the Lagrangian multiplier method. So, taking the substitution technique it can be applied to the problem of profit maximization or it can be for the cost minimization. For a profit maximization one of the variable express in term of the other variables and solve the constraint equation for obtaining the value of one variable. Suppose, there are two variable X and Y. So, the best way for solving it through the substitution technique is represent one variable with the other variable and then you solve for that variable and finally, you substitute the value of one variable in term of what you have solved to the other variable and here the values obtained is substituted in the objective function which is maximized or solve for obtaining the value of the other variables. So, whatever the value is obtained by substituted it will be again substituted back in the objective function which is maximized and solve for obtaining the value for the other variable. So, we will see how we use this substitution technique in case of a profit optimization problem and in case of a cost minimization. And how this is different for cost minimization may be the method again remain same the constraint equation is express in term of any one of these two goods of the variables and the equation is obtained from step one is substituted in the objective function. So, whether it is a cost function, whether it is a profit function, the basic rule for the substitution technique is that we express one variable in term of the other variables, we get the value of one variable and finally, again substitute back to the objective function. So, we will just take an example how generally we do the constant optimization along with the constant with the objective function, whether the objective function is a profit maximization or whether the objective function is a cost minimization. So, we will take a case of profit maximization first and in case of profit maximization we will maximize the profit. So, here profit is equal to 100 x minus 2 x square minus x y plus 180 y minus 4 y square. This is the profit function and the profit maximization, here the optimization problem is the profit maximization. Since, we are saying that this is the case of a constant optimization, there is also a constant attached to this and the constant is in the form of x plus y is equal to 30. So, now what is the optimization problem? The optimization problem is maximization of profit function with respect to the constant that is x plus y which is equal to 30. Now, how we will do this? The first step is we will express x in term of y or we can express y in term of x and after the getting the value of x or y, again we will substitute this value of x and y in the profit function. So, now we will see let us substitute the value of x and y before it converting into the another term or may be the profit maximization problem. So, suppose x plus y is equal to 30, so this can be rewritten as x is equal to 30 minus y. So, in this case x we are representing in term of y or y can be 30 minus x. So, substituting the value of x and y in the profit equation what we can get? Pi is equal to 100, it was 100 x, so x we are representing in term of y, so this is 30 minus y plus 2, 30 minus y square because it was 2 x square minus 30 minus y y because it was x y plus 180 y minus 4 y square. So, if you look at the profit function now all the terms in term of y, there is no x over here in the case of the profit function. Now, again if you will simplify this, then this comes to 1200 plus 170 y minus 5 y square. So, what we did the first step is this where we represent x in term of y. Now, substituting the value of x in the form of y in the profit equation which gives the profit equation which is equal to 1200 plus 170 y plus minus 5 y square. Now, to find out the value of y what we have to do? We have to take the derivative of pi with respect to y and which we need to set equal to 0. So, if you are taking this then this comes as the first order derivative because for any maximization minimization rule in order to get the value always the first order derivative has to be equal to 0. So, del pi by del y is equal to 0 which is like 1200 plus 170 y minus 5 y square which is equal to 0. Now, solving this will give you 170 minus 10 y which is equal to 0 or may be minus 10 y is equal to minus 170 and y is equal to 17. Now, what is our x? x is equal to 30 minus y. So, this is equal to 30 minus 17 which is equal to 13. So, we get a value y which is equal to 17, we get a value of x which is equal to 13. Now, putting the value of y and x in our profit equation we get profit which is equal to 2800. So, here how we maximize the profit with respect to a cost constant or with respect to a value of x and y? The first step is always to represent one variable in term of the other variable. So, in this case what we did? We represented x in term of y and after represent the value of one variable in term of the other variables then we put the value in the objective function. So, if you remember in the previous slide what I am showing that we represent the profit function only in term of variable y. Then after getting the profit function we took the first order derivative equal to 0 in order to get the value of y and through that we got the value of y which is equal to 17 and from there we got the value of x which is equal to 13. Now, putting the value of x and y in the original profit function we get a profit which is equal to 2800. So, by substitution technique following the two step we got the profit, we got the value of x and we got the value of y. Now, we will see through substitution technique how we can do a cost minimization problem. So, here what is the optimization problem? The optimization problem is to minimization of the total cost. Now what is total cost? Let us take total cost is equal to 2 x square minus x y plus 3 y square. Now the form here what is the constant? The form has to get a 36 units of x and y as the combined order. Now what is the optimum combination? Optimum combination is to what is the what should be the minimum cost to produce this 36 unit of x and y. So, in this case what should be the constant? The constant is again if you look at x plus y is equal to 36. So, optimization problem is to minimize the total cost with respect to or may be subject to x plus y is equal to 36. Now following the substitution technique what is the first step? The first stage we have to represent one variable in term of the other variable. So, x is equal to 36 minus y because if you remember the first step substitution technique is always representing one variable in term of the other variable. So, here x is equal to 36 minus y. Now putting the value of x in the cost equation 2 x square. So, this is 2 36 minus y square x and y. So, this is 36 minus y y plus 3 y square. So, this is 3 y square. So, if you again simplify this this comes to 2592 minus 180 y plus 6 y square. So, after putting the value of x in the cost function in term of y we get a total cost function which is equal to 2592 180 y plus 6 y square. Now, in order to get the value of y and in order to get the optimum combination or the optimum cost what we have to do? We have to take the first step derivative of total cost function with respect to y and we have to set it equal to 0 in order to get the value of y. So, now we have to take a derivative the first order derivative of 2592 minus 180 y plus 6 y square and this has to be equal to 0. So, if you do this then we get the value 180 plus 12 y which is equal to 0 which you further simplify then it is minus 12 y is equal to minus 180 and y is equal to 15. And if it is y is equal to 15 then x is equal to 36 minus y which is equal to 21. So, y is equal to 15 x is equal to 21. Now, this is the optimum combination the firm should produce 15 unit of y and 21 unit of x and this is the optimum combination for the firm. Now, what is the next best task for us? The next best task for us is to whether producing this combination the firm is incurring the minimum cost of production or not what should be the minimum cost to produce this combination. So, for that what we need to do? We need to put the value of y we need to put the value of x in the cost equation and we need to find out the minimum cost. So, what was your cost equation? The cost equation is 2 x square minus x y plus 3 y square. So, putting the value of x is equal to 21 and y is equal to 15 this comes to 882 minus 315 plus 675 which is equal to 1 to 4. So, this is the minimum cost what the firm incurs in order to produce 15 unit of y and 21 unit of x. So, what is the optimization problem here? The optimization problem here is to minimize the cost with a constraint that at any cost the firm has to produce 36 unit of both the goods that is x and y. So, this is the optimum combination for the firm and this is the minimum cost to produce the optimum combination of the firm. Next we will see the second method for this constant optimization and that is the Lagrangian multiplier method. So, apart from substitution technique the most popular or may be the most commonly used technique to do a constant optimization is always a Lagrangian multiplier method. So, what is Lagrangian multiplier method? It is again one up kind of method to solve the constant optimization and it involves combining of both the objective function and the constant equation and solving by using the partial derivative methods. Basically, it takes the partial derivative with respect to both the variables and then he gets the value of x and y and you know by getting the value of x and y it maximizes or the profit or minimizes the cost. So, we will see how it works for the Lagrangian methods. Let us take a profit maximization case. Suppose, the profit equation is 100 x minus 2 x square minus x y plus 1, 1, 80 y minus 4 y square. Again subject to a constant optimization x plus y is equal to 30. The same profit equation what we took for the substitution technique and the same constant what we took for by using the substitution technique method. So, x plus y is 30 that is constant and profit is what we take for the substitution method. Now, how it is different from the other method? In case of other method we are substituting the value of x and x for y or y for x. Here we will not do that, but rather we will use partial derivative method to solve this profit maximization problem. In this case what we do? So, x plus y is equal to 30. So, we will find another variable that here that is x plus y minus 30 is equal to 0 and lambda x plus y minus 30. So, now, we will reframe the objective function using the adding a Lagrangian multiplier over here. And what is the Lagrangian multiplier here? That is lambda x plus y minus 30, this is the another term what we are getting here. So, what is our new profit function? New profit function is 100 x minus 2 x square minus x y plus 1, 80 y minus 4 y square minus 4 y square. This is our original profit function. Along with that we add a Lagrangian multiplier that is lambda x plus y minus 30. So, if you look at now the constant also we have added in the objective function. So, this is our Lagrangian function. Lagrangian function comes from the constant and what we add in the objective function in order to maximize the profit. Now, this is the profit function now. Now, we have to find out the value of unknowns over here. What are the unknowns over here? The unknown is x, the unknown is y and the unknown is lambda. So, we need to solve for the value of x, we need to solve for the value of y, we need to solve for the value of lambda. Now, how we will do that? We will take a partial derivative of the profit function with respect to x, we will take a partial derivative with respect to profit with respect to y and we will take a partial derivative with respect to lambda, what is the Lagrangian function or which one is the Lagrangian multiplier. So, we will take the first one that is L may be first derivative of this with respect to x. So, this we will get as 100 minus 4 x minus y plus lambda which is equal to 0 and let us call it the equation 1. Similarly, for the second one we have to take the derivative with respect to y. So, this comes as lambda, sorry this as x plus 180 minus 8 y plus lambda which is equal to 0 and this is equation 2. The third unknown is with respect to lambda. So, this is del L pi with respect to lambda that gives you x plus y minus 30 and this is equation 3. Now, if you make a summation and if you can make it 2 equation then it comes to 100 minus 4 x minus y plus lambda is equal to 0 and if you add the second 2 equation this is 180 minus x minus 8 y plus lambda is equal to 0. So, if you do a subtraction from 1 to 2 over here then you would get minus 80 minus 3 x plus 7 y plus 0 which is equal to 0. So, if you look at what we did over here we basically in order to get the value of x and y we got a got 2 equation may be 2 joint equation in order to get the value of the unknown. So, in the first case this is 100 minus 4 x minus y plus lambda and second case it is 180 minus x minus 8 y plus lambda which is equal to 0. If you subtract the second one from the first one when we get minus 80 minus 3 x plus 7 y plus 0 which is equal to 0. Now, if you look at the equation 3 x plus y minus 30 this is our equation 3 will multiply 3 with this equation. So, this is x plus y minus 30 which is equal to 0. So, if you multiply 3 in equation 3 this comes to 3 x plus 3 y minus 90 equal to 0 and what was your previous equation when we did for this this is minus 3 x plus 7 y and minus 80 and if you take this again this comes to minus 3 x plus 7 y minus 80 which is equal to 0. From this 2 equation if you sum it then it comes to 10 y minus 170 minus 0. So, we get x plus y which is equal to 0 and y is equal to 17. So, we got the first unknown value that is y is equal to 17. Now, we can get the value of x from here because x plus y is equal to 13. So, from that we can get the value x which is equal to 13 and now we can get a value from the. So, this is our first unknown this is our second unknown our third unknown is lambda. So, from the value of x and y we can get the value of lambda and lambda will come to minus 31. So, we have the we know the value of all these 3 unknown once we put in the value in the profit equation we get the profit and we can see whether the profit is maximum or not. Similarly, using this Lagrangian method we can also solve a cost minimization problem where the optimization problem is to minimize the cost. So, let us look at to the cost minimization problem. Now, the cost function over here is 100 x square plus 150 y square and this is subject to x plus y which is equal to 500. Now, Lagrangian method what is the first step? The first step is to get the Lagrangian function from the constant equation then again form a cost function adding the Lagrangian multiplier or the Lagrangian function. So, in this case the Lagrangian function is lambda 500 minus x minus y. So, this is our Lagrangian function taking this what is our Lagrangian cost function that is 100 x square plus 150 y square plus lambda 500 minus x minus y. So, if you look at now how we have again 3 unknown that is x y and lambda in order to find that what we will do we will follow the same maybe formula what we do did for the profit maximization. We will find out del L c with respect to x we will find out del L c with respect to y and we will find out the del L c with respect to lambda. And after getting the equation again we can get the value of x as 1.5 y. So, that comes to y is equal to 200 and x is equal to 300 and from there we can get the value of the cost and we can get the value of the Lagrangian multiplier. So, what is the essential difference between the substitution technique and the Lagrangian technique? We use both the methods to solve the constant optimization problem and what is a constant optimization problem a constant optimization problem is 1, where we maximize the profit function or the minimize the cost function with a constant that is in the form of the other variable. So, in case of substitution technique what we do we substitute the we represent the value of one variable in term of the other variables and then we substitute that value in term of the other variables in the objective function whether it is a profit function or whether it is a cost function. Then we solve for it and we get when we get one value we represent that in term of others and get the final value of the other variable also. And in case of Lagrangian multiplier method we form a Lagrangian function on the basis of a constant add that to our objective function and solve the objective function through the partial derivative method in order to know the value of unknowns and what are the unknowns over here unknowns always in term of the variable 2 variable those are in the objective function here typically in the case of the x and y. So, we started our discussion for this typical topic we started our discussion with the relationship between different variables whether it is linear, collinear, maybe non-linear or curvilinear. Then we discuss different function attached to different kind of function linear, non-linear and the curvilinear. Then we show then I think we discuss the method of how to solve the different functions and then we talked about the optimization problem where we maximize the profit and minimize the cost and today's class we have talked about the optimization with a constant using both the method that is Lagrangian method and the substitution technique.


Kalu Bhavar, a 48-year-old travel man from Mukhara in Pulgurd, borrowed money from local MLA's aid to perform his son's last rites. He was forced to work without pay and killed himself after being harassed over a loan of nearly Rs. 500 to buy a coffin for the last rites of his 13-year-old son in November. The accused Ramdas Ambukodre, a close aide of local MLA Sunil Buzara, booked under Bounded Labour Act. As a response to his act, MLA Buzara said, the FIR against Kodre is fake. If such FIRs are registered, then a time will come when no tribal will be called into work in the field. This is not the only instance of Bounded Labour, but there are many instances where either police have not registered the case or the victim themselves due to lack of knowledge and financial resources to not complain. Let's take a look at what is Bounded Labour. Bounded Labour, also known as Death Slavery, is the promise of persons labour as a security until the death is repaid. The term and conditions of repayment are not stated and the person who lends money has control over the labourer. The original Bounded Labour can be traced back to the ancient in the society divided into different caste groups. The marginalized caste was stripped off all means and was forced to rely on dominant caste for their own survival. This gives employers and lenders an unfair edge by snatching away all freedom of poor labourers through death, threat and surveillance. What are the legal safeguards available to prevent these atrocious acts? Under Article 23 of the Indian Constitution, human trafficking and forced labour is prohibited. The Supreme Court in PUCL vs Union of India 1982 construed Article 23 and held any person forced as Bounded Labour and one working at a rate less than the minimum wage is to be treated equally. Article 21 secures the rights to life and personal liberty. The Minimum Wages Act of 1948 sets a minimum wage bar for defined occupations and mandates other provisions to ensure fair compensation. Bounded Labour System of Violation Act 1976 stipulates a maximum sentence of three years in prison and a fine of Rs 2000 against offenders forcing bounded labour. Section 374 of IPC recognize unlawful compulsory labour and stipulates a sentence of imprisonment up to one year, a fine or both. But in spite of legal standards, why does bounded labour still exist? With the enactment of Bounded Labour System of Violation Act, thousands of bounded labourers were identified but they are released loads substantially during the 1990s with officials downplaying the magnitude of bounded labour. A report on bounded labour in South Asia by international human rights organization Anti-Slabry International reveals shocking details which are the drive for change came from grassroots and civil society pressure rather than from government leadership and those released were reportedly denied rehabilitation due to corruption, mismanagement and local political opinions. Training and compensation as part of rehabilitation packages were proving to be insufficient to meet the needs of newly released bounded labourers. State also neglected to recognize family members' bounded status. Women were not given release certificates and were denied state benefits. The labourer-employer contract are usually negotiated with the head of the family that being the husband, the women face double zippity. Let's take a look at why state interventions remain unsustained and incomprehensive. In India, bounded labour results from poverty, social marginalization and the government's unwillingness to address the practice and its underlying causes. The tendency of reducing labour protection to panda-big corporations reflects government intent. The labour protections are weakened, giving employers opportunities to exploit poor workers' freedom through debt, surveillance and threats. Let's take a look at the total budget and expenditure for the rehabilitation of bounded labour. The funds released for bounded labour rehabilitation were Rs.664.5 lakhs in 2017-18. It was decreased by 61% the following year to Rs.253.3 lakhs. Not a single rupee was spent in 2019-20 by the Ministry of Labour and Employment for the rehabilitation of bounded labour. Labour laws emerged out of long struggles and aimed to ensure power parity between employers and employees. Despite various legal safeguards, the specter of bounded labour still plagues our nation. There is an immediate need for the state to work in close tandem with the civil society to combine resources and power and a better understanding of this grave situation.


The Arctic is really a kind of weather vane for climate change. You can come here and you can see all of the changes that are occurring because of the huge amount of carbon dioxide that we're putting into the atmosphere. It's like paint being poured on the top of the planet and dripping down on time scales of decades. As it gets further south, we're going to see effects where the temperatures will be really rising rapidly. We're seeing lots more flooding, we're seeing more instances of drought, we're seeing high levels of rain variability even if we're living on different parts of the world. Climate change is a reality. We need to connect the best minds and the best hearts and have them work together to create solutions that we might not even know about. The 18 hottest years ever recorded, 17 of them have been in this century. This is 250,000 year old ice that will never be replaced again and you see the beauty and you feel it and you realize this is going away. We are moving very close towards a world that has irreversible damage to it. We'll have sea level rise no matter what happens for at least 500 years and it's not going to get cooler on any time scale we know. The planet is going to be here whether we're going to live on it or not. It's us that we're losing. We have not communicated this in a way that moves people's hearts and minds enough. There is a missing trust between society and science and it can only be bridged by establishing communication platforms that are better. When you look at the efficiency of how we're actually running our business it is not that efficient right now. We also have hundreds of thousands of computers that are alive constantly taking up energy. Nobody looks at their software development practices anymore. They don't realize that like a random for loop costs lots of money. Every day there's a city council who's done a new bike sharing program or a new financing green bond that's going on. I hope to accelerate that by telling the stories about what's working. When humanity is pressed to the wall we always arise to the occasion.


If you want to make one person take, that will be 22 person take. All right, set it in that corner. All right, so we're at... I'm First Lieutenant Yerco Dinacelillo Moreno from the Military Academy, but in this case I will work with you until the end of the year. So this is instruction on the exercise center. Speed turn. And then stern groves. Yeah, we're all right. Good, sir. Good, sir. So guys, we have electromagnetic spectrum. Can anybody tell me what that is? Fields. It can affect the batteries? Yeah, for everything. For everything. Brackets crampons. Brackets crampons for countries. I'm First Lieutenant Yerco Dinacelillo. I'm Second Lieutenant Yerco Dinacelillo. I understand. Where's the mic? Equipment in the middle of the shelter. Please, guys. No. It's right here. Keep all our check. Right in here. Oh, yeah. You know what I'm saying? It's in the bottom. Yep. Okay. That's it. One here. Who's going to break down here? You're going to break down here? You're going to break down here? You don't want to do that. You don't want to do that? Your system's part right? Blackhawk 6, Blackhawk 9 to Romeo. Ready to check over? No. We cannot cross 9, 6, 5, 16.


Want to learn about stocks, cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and the metaverse? Join RichTV.io. Hi, how's everybody doing today? I'm your host, Rich. Here we have a RichTV Live with a very special guest, the CEO of Spay Resources Corp, Natter Vitanchi. How are you doing today, Natter? Rich, it's been a while, my friend. It's good to see you again. And thank you for having me. It's been quite the journey, but Spay is back. So glad to be here. Hey, I'm excited to have Spay on the show and learn more and have you talk about it. And my first question is, what kind of progress has the company made on its projects since we last had you on the show? Well, actually one of the key milestones and progress that we made is that we made the necessary payment for 80% ownership for our flagship Candela 2 project in the Inca Wasi Solar. And we continued to hold the option to purchase the remaining 20%. During this period, we actually optioned off our Positos 1 project to recharge resources so that we could focus more on Inca Wasi. But I do note that we still retain 20% of Positos 1 and still hold the option for our other project, which I'll elaborate on shortly, which is called Positos 2. What are your general thoughts on lithium in this environment that we're in right now? Well, there's been, no, no, if you saw, but there's been a lot of news and activity regarding lithium, for example, the Biden administration recently announced that they'll be funding Canadian mining and metal companies as they find sources of material for electric vehicles. Also, the car manufacturers themselves have been very active and we're working on getting agreements in place to source lithium in Argentina. So I think we're in the right place and the demand is, I think, outweighing the supply, which is why I think, you know, why lithium prices have stayed around 70,000 US for a ton, which is quite impressive, you know, in the current market condition we're in. So I think there's a lot of positive things happening for lithium moving forward. And I think that's as great to hear as, you know, for those that are in the lithium space, that are investing in the lithium space.  Well, we're definitely looking to further advance our flagship Candela 2 project in the Inca Wasi Solar and we are planning to do a five-hole production drill program and this rich will generate a resource calculation for us. And you know, this is very important for SPA resources. So we're excited for that. And we're also gonna be planning to drill one or two exploratory drill holes for Pocitos 2. And yeah, we look forward to share those results. And now obviously the work that we have planned will require us to do a financing, but thankfully with the support that we've had and received during the difficult times, you know, we're still able to do this. And yeah, and we're able to resume the progression of our project. So just wanted to say thank you to all of those from the bottom of my heart that continue to support SPA. And we look forward to sharing these results with everyone very soon. Super excited to watch you guys continue to grow and develop. I must remind everyone that Rich TV Live strictly for information and education purposes, please do your due diligence, do your research before you invest in anything we talk or discuss here on Rich TV. Now when saying that, we wanna bring your attention to the symbols in America, S-P-E-Y-F and in Canada, S-P-E-Y. And thank you for joining us today, the CEO of SPA Resources Corp, Nader Vettenshi. Thank you for joining us today, Nader. Thank you so much, Rich. I look forward to being on your show again very soon. Yes, we'd love to invite you back any time you have big breaking news or anything you wanna discuss. And for those of you guys that are watching, if you're not winning, you're probably not watching.  Put SPA Resources Corp on your radar, on your watch list. This is Rich from Rich TV Live with Nader Vettenshi saying have a nice day everybody, we'll see you soon.


So I remember there was different synchronicities happening like this where Islam kept on coming up and I felt like I Felt like even the hasm as we were saying like you don't know this You must all right. You don't know you don't pray you don't and I feel I generally feel embarrassed But at the same time I was I had this Non-blind following Yeah, I was very independent in my in my thoughts in my opinions, etc. So So little by little I started to there was a Turkish guy's what they put me in a class where For people who don't know French. There was a Turkish guy and He said you must all right your name mama do more Mahmood mom and he showed me sort of fatih in his phone And I said send it to me send it to me. He sent it to me It was generally I remember Subhan Allah. It's it was like Like it was the first time I hear in Quran Precited imagine growing up in a Muslim family, right? My parents both were with where Muslim when I grew up when I was born So I was generally impressed. Oh this Quran subhan Allah. Okay. You're saying to me and when I went home I show my father look there's a friend in my class. He sent me this my father was surprised. Oh Yeah, yeah, he's a good friend Back in those days with the phones you have to hold them together. That was the infrared infrared Yeah, I think it was bluetons or something like that before blue to The sensor to the sensor. Yeah, I don't know how he even sent it to me But yeah, I got home and my father was surprised was oh, yeah. Yeah Islam. Yeah Yeah, and I think you know my father and my mom's they didn't have much knowledge in Islam They love the Dean, but they don't know how to convey it Yeah, yeah, and of course they be easy with their own life, etc