The decision on major service change proposals in Glasgow and Clyde. The cabinet secretary will take questions at the end of her statement, so that there should be no interventions or interruptions. I would encourage all members who wish to ask a question off the cabinet secretary to press their request to skip buttons now. I welcome the opportunity to inform members of the decisions that I announced on Friday, 19 January, on service change proposals submitted to me by the chairman of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. On 14 March 2017, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde submitted major service change proposals for Clyde, inpatient and day-case pediatrics services. That was followed on 16 August by the board submitting major service change proposals for rehabilitation services in the north-east of Glasgow, including Lightburn hospital. Before I turn to the detail of each proposal, I want to explain my decision making process. Given the significance of the proposals, I took appropriate time to consider them. I asked for and received advice, including expert clinical views. I also visited the paediatric ward, the Royal Alexander hospital, the new royal hospital for children on the Queen Elizabeth campus, and Lightburn hospital. Alongside those visits, I met local stakeholders, including campaigners, seeking the retention of paediatric services in ward 15, as well as patients and carers. Considering the proposals for Lightburn hospital, I met the local Parkinson's group. I also received reports from the Scottish Health Council confirming that the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde had complied with and met established guidance on engaging and consulting with local people, providing them with the opportunity to make their views known. I will now address my decision on the Lightburn hospital service change proposals. I want to make it clear that I have carefully considered all the available information and all the representations that are made to me. In doing so, I had to consider whether the board had made a compelling case in the best interests of patients and whether the board had credible and viable plans for the provision of high-quality local services. I have been consistently clear during the board's review process that the final proposals had to effectively address the concerns that resulted in our rejection of the previous Lightburn closure proposals in 2011. Concerns were raised by local people that those concerns are not being addressed in the current proposals. Considering the proposals, my paramount concern was that, if they were to be implemented, they would result in the removal of a significant and highly valued healthcare facility in one of the most deprived communities in Scotland. I wish to record that I accept the local clinicians' views and have given very careful consideration to them and their support for the closure of Lightburn hospital. However, I had to balance those views against concerns that I have, that the proposed replacement of local community and support services are not yet sufficiently developed to support the closure. Presiding Officer, I want to make clear that this was not an easy decision. I fully agree that healthcare services cannot be static and that the reform will sometimes be necessary. In my letter to the board setting out my decision, I have acknowledged and welcomed their commitment to work with other planning partners to develop as a priority a health and social care hub in East Glasgow. I have reiterated to the board that engagement with and involvement of the local community is of paramount importance in any future planning. That is, of course, applicable to all NHS boards when considering any service redesign, and I will take the opportunity to reinforce that at my next meeting with NHS chairs. I will now turn to my decision to approve the board's proposals to transfer in-patient and day-case paediatric services from ward 15 at the Royal Alexander hospital in Paisley to the Royal hospital for children in Glasgow. Presiding Officer, I gave long and hard consideration to this proposal, and it has been one of the most difficult that I have been required to make in my time as health secretary. As in my consideration of the light-burn proposal, I have carefully considered all of the information available to me and all of the representations that are made to me, including the board's submissions, advice and evidence provided by officials and expert clinical advice. My judgment had to be on whether the board had made a compelling case in the best interests of patient care, whether it had credible and viable plans for the provision of high-quality local services and whether the proposals were consistent with national guidance. Having taken time to come to a decision, I have approved the board's proposals. In coming to this decision, I recognised that it was only the in-patient and day-case services that would transfer and that the majority of patient cases would continue to be seen and treated locally. I would stress that the accident in emergency departments at both the RAH and underclined royal hospitals will continue to receive paediatric patients who self-present, alongside the continuation of outpatient clinics as well as specialist community paediatric services. The board has made a compelling case for those proposals, which have attracted overwhelming clinical support. Only today I received a letter from the lead paediatric clinicians and the chief nurse for paediatrics in neonatology at the RAH and the Royal hospital for children, reiterating their clinical support for the proposals. They have told me that the change will help implement the standard set out by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health to ensure that high-quality healthcare is delivered to children and young people and that the implementation of those standards will contribute to better outcomes for children and young people. We also highlight the benefit to patient care of having access to dedicated on-site subspecialty medical teams such as cardiology, neurology, nephrology and respiratory medicine to name but a few. This is further supported by the submission of Action for Sick Children Scotland, now Children's Health Scotland, to the board's consultation. Their submission concluded that the most compelling argument is that clinical standards are there to support the best quality healthcare for all of the children of Scotland and we feel that this would be best achieved by moving ward 15 to the Royal Hospital for Children. The local clinicians also offer the reassurance on emergency care that they do not nor do they see any risk to future patients affected by the change in an emergency pathway that directs general practitioners and the Scottish Ambulance Service to the Royal Hospital for Children instead of either the RAH or the Royal Hospital for Children. The change is clear for all concerned. I recognise that, from the representations that I received and the meetings that I have attended that many local people from the Paisley area in particular will be deeply disappointed by that decision. I recognise that the services that families have received from ward 15 have been highly valued and that there are understandable concerns about access to the specialised services to be transferred to the Royal Hospital for Children and how those will be integrated into those outpatient and community services that will continue to be provided locally. There are also issues about transport and financial support and family support and information services. That is why I have approved those proposals on two conditions. One, that the health board must maintain and continue to improve community-based paediatric services and maintain local provision. Two, that the board must work directly with families from the Paisley area on specific individual treatment service access plans to be complete before any service changes are made, ensuring that there is a full understanding of what services and support will be available to them and from where. The letter from the Glasgow clinicians also gives an assurance that the open access families currently attending ward 15 will be fully involved in planning how the changes will affect their child. Any specific concerns that they have will be addressed on an individual basis. I have spoken to the board chair and reiterated the conditions that are set out in my letter of approval. I have received a letter from him giving me that assurance. I hope that local families, members of the campaign group and members here today will understand that I have made the decision in good faith, as informed by all the available evidence and representations. With the underpinning conditions that I have put in place, I believe that this decision is in the best interests of children across the Clyde area. Miles Briggs will be followed by Anna Sauer. I thank the cabinet secretary for advance copy of her statement. On 1 May 2016, Nicola Sturgeon promised the public in relation to ward 15 at the RAH. I quote, There are no proposals to close that particular ward. I believe in local services with access for local people. Here we are today, two years on. At that time, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde had initially begun looking into moving in-patient paediatric services from RAH in 2011, when Nicola Sturgeon was health secretary. The closure of the ward to inpatients had been on the board's preferred option since 2012, when she was also health secretary. The board stepped up efforts to centralise services after the opening of Glasgow's new royal hospital for children in 2015, when she was the First Minister. Did the First Minister forget all of this when she promised at a public event in 2016 that she was not or was she intending to attempt to mislead the public before an election? I believe that today we will go down as Nicola Sturgeon and the health secretary's Niclegg moment in this Parliament, and now we see this health secretary and the back benches from the SNP hanging their heads in shame of this decision to justify this decision to Parliament, breaking a key election pledge made to families across the west of Scotland. Does not this ward closure come on top of the SNP's failure over children's hospital services and the long-going incidents that we have seen, as long as closure of the kids' inpatient ward here in St John's in Livingston just goes to demonstrate that the public cannot trust a word that the First Minister or SNP Government says when it comes to our local health services? First of all, can I address the issue that Miles Briggs first raised about the First Minister's comments on 1 May 2016? Let me say two things very clearly about that. First of all, the Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board approved its proposals on 18 October 2016, well after the comments on 1 May, but more importantly than that, the Scottish Government received that submission on 14 March 2017. Almost a year later, plus, that was the first time that I have made this decision, the first time that I saw the clinical advice that I have based my decision on. It is that clinical advice that is absolutely critical here. I have based my decision on the clear clinical view, including from those very clinicians who work with these kids on ward 15. That decision, as I said in my statement, is about delivering better outcomes for children and young people. When Miles Briggs or anyone else says that I am wrong in my decision, they must also be saying that these clinicians are wrong in their decision. I am not sure on what basis Miles Briggs is able to say that, what experience or evidence he will put forward to say that those local clinicians are wrong. I, as a politician, cannot say that those local clinicians are wrong. That is why I have accepted their evidence and that is why I have accepted this decision, albeit how difficult it was. Just to reiterate, for all those families, plans will be put in place absolutely before this goes ahead. I hope that that is of some reassurance to the families concerned. I thank the cabinet secretary for advance sight of our statement and I pay tribute to the Save Lightburn campaign and the Kidnead Award campaign. Local residents and service users are tirelessly fighting to protect their local services. Services that they were promised would stay open during the election. Sadly, while one is celebrating for now, the other is rightly distraught and dismayed. However, the reality is that we should never have been here in the first place. When faced with a leaked cuts paper, the Government denied any proposals to close lightburn or the REH pediatric ward even existed.    The campaigners were accused of scaremongering, but now the closure is confirmed and 8,000 patient cases will be transferred to the already overstretched QEUH. That is a result of cuts imposed by this Government and a workforce crisis that is overseen by this cabinet secretary. However, not a single MSP on those benches has the backbone to call out for what it is. Where were the local MSPs, George Adam, Tom Arthur and Derek Mackay? Nowhere. Where was the local MP, Mary Black? Nowhere. When confronted by a local resident live on national television, Nicola Sturgeon said, and I quote, that there are no plans to close this ward, I pledge to keep hospital services local. This is a betrayal of local people. How can we ever trust a word this cabinet secretary or this Government ever says again? As I said to Miles Briggs, the submission from the board came to me on 14 March 2017. That was the first time that I saw the clinical advice on which I have based my decision. If Anasawa is saying that that is the wrong decision, he must also be saying that the local clinicians who have treated these children for many years are also wrong in their clinical judgment, because that, as a politician, is what I have based my decision on. If Anasawa thinks that he knows better than those local clinicians, he better say on what evidence he has that can make that stack up. Now, Anasawa mentioned the cuts paper. Let me say two things about that. One is that the issue of finance is quite important here, because in relation to the ward 15 at the RAH, it is estimated that there is about £840,000 that will be reinvested in local services, pediatric services at the Royal Alexander hospital and at the Royal hospital for children. Every penny of that will be reinvested in pediatric services at both of those hospitals. Had I been wanting to save money on Anasawa, it would have been the light-burn proposal that I would have given the go-ahead, because it would have saved £4 million. That is about nothing about money. That is about the clinician's view of what is better outcomes for children and young people. As a politician, I cannot ignore clinicians who tell me that, for children and young people, there will be better outcomes by this decision. I challenge any politician in this place to ignore that clinical advice. Does the cabinet secretary agree with me that the decisions that are announced on Greater Glasgow and Clyde's health board major service change proposals show that the review process is robust and evidence-based and that, where there are good reasons in line with the Scottish Government's national clinical strategy and other policies to overturn health board proposals, such as, in the case of Lightburn hospital, the process reaches the correct decisions? What I can say is that, with the Lightburn proposals, they were not developed to a stage that was viable or credible. There is the idea of the East End hub, which in essence is a good idea, but it has to be developed. What we want to see is, in terms of the sites for that hub going forward, for the Lightburn site to be considered as part of that. There is far more work for Glasgow to be done around developing that hub, which, as I think we would all agree, has some merit. It was at such an early stage that I could not possibly have approved it in the form that it came into me. Can the cabinet secretary confirm, when she expects the agreement process to conclude for families currently receiving treatment at ward 15 at the RAH, and what will happen if agreements cannot be reached? I have made it very clear to the board, to John Brown as the chair, that for those families who have complex health needs—and there are around 200 of those families, many of whom are on the open access agreement—those plans have to be in place before those changes go ahead. The board, John Brown as the chair, has written back to me agreeing that. The clinicians in their letter also say that that is important. What needs to be very clear in all those plans is access to the new hospital, how that will happen, but also about the local services that will still be provided to those families. That is one of the conditions that I have made it very clear. One of the conditions on approval of that is that all those plans need to be in place, and that is something that I will certainly hold the board to. Neil Bibby, followed by Alison Johnson. Over 17,000 people supported the campaign to stop the closure of the kids' ward, including NHS staff, and patients with direct first-hand experience of the excellent care that it provides. Parents such as Karen Meagle have told her story to the Paisley Daily Express today about what it means for her eight-year-old son, who has a life-limiting condition. The way that SNP politicians nationally and locally have behaved has left local families feeling totally betrayed and without any trust left in this Government. Throughout this process, the cabinet secretary assured families that she would listen. Well, he could not have been clearer. Why have they been ignored? The cabinet secretary has snubbed parents with this announcement. Will the cabinet secretary agree to come to Paisley and explain her decision directly to the parents who are affected, or will she snub them again? Neil Bibby, I did not snub the parents. I met the parents and listened to their concerns. I also listened to the local doctors who have been involved in treating those same children. Therefore, I had to make a decision, and the decision that I made was based on the very clear local clinical advice from those doctors who know the children very well indeed that this was in the best interests of those children, that they would get better outcomes—not worse outcomes—better outcomes from being treated at the new children's hospital. No politician would ignore that clinical advice. What is important now is that the board get on and develop those plans so that the families have the assurance that, around the access arrangements, they will have at the state of their new hospital less than seven miles away. I visited the hospital last year in family support and information services, and I learned about the incredible work that they do supporting parents, patients and their wider families. I met parents, too, of children. They had taken their child to hospital, their child was admitted immediately, and they found themselves practically living in the hospital for weeks. I was surprised that much of that important work was largely funded and reliant on charitable donations. Given that there will be increased demand on those services in the hospital, the major service change will generate increased demand. Will the cabinet secretary take steps to ensure that the service is fully funded and sustainable? Those families who are travelling further, who are away from home for longer, who are leaving caring responsibilities behind, will be properly supported. Can I first of all thank Alison Drosie for her question? Yes, reassure her. Part of the commitment that the board has given around the reinvestment of £840,000 is to ensure that there is a build-up of local services, not just at the Royal Hospital for Children but also at the REH. Part of that is about making sure that there are plans in place for those families, whether that is travel or subsistence or any other, and, importantly, that they know about that. I also just wanted to reiterate a point about making sure that, where emergency care is required, the clinicians are very, very clear that the change in the emergency pathway that directs the GPs and the Scottish Ambulance Service to the Royal Hospital for Children is a better and safer model. There is clarity about where children are going in an emergency situation. I reiterate again that, for a lot of the care, particularly around outpatient facilities and local community paediatric services, they will remain delivered locally. For children who are accessing the A&E services at the Royal Alexandra hospital, 86 per cent of children in the Paisley area will continue to be seen at the front door of the Royal Alexandra hospital. The vast majority of children in that area, going through A&E, will continue in the same way as they do at the moment. Alex Cole-Hamilton will be followed by Fulton MacGregor. In her statement, the cabinet secretary says of her decision to close the children's ward at the Royal Alexandra hospital, that it has been one of the most difficult that I have been required to make in my time as health secretary. That reflection should give us the measure of how significant this closure is, not just for the cabinet secretary but for the families who rely on it and those members in this chamber who have fought to save it. Will the Government now commit to honour those motions already passed in this chamber, to bring such decisions to Parliament before they are taken, to allow members to debate and scrutinise those proposals, so that, in particular, we might give better voice to the people such closures will affect? Alex Cole-Hamilton says that those are difficult decisions. I met with the parents and the families and I understand the strength of feeling here, but as the cabinet secretary required to make those difficult decisions, I have to take a step back from that. As a politician, I rely on the expertise of those who, first of all, know the children very well and who can give me the best advice about what is the best, effective and safest care. In this case or any other case, the clinical advice is critical. That has to be the decision-making process, because otherwise, what we would have are service change proposals where there are issues about patient safety, potentially, brought here for debate on the floor of Parliament, so our decision is going to be made about patient safety on the basis of a vote in this place. I do not think that that is a credible or a safe way to make changes to our health service. The decision rests with me and I have made this decision on the basis of what the clinicians have told me is in the best interests, is the best outcome for those children and young people, no other considerations. I would hope that every politician in this place would understand that you cannot ignore that. Unless there is a paediatric specialist in this place, I do not think that there is. I am not, so I rely on the expertise of those who advise me. That is the basis of this decision. That is why it is the right decision. Fulton MacGregor, to be followed by Jamie Greene. Thank you, Presiding Officer, and I will remain to the chamber and appeal to the health secretary. The cabinet secretary has mentioned several times today already the clinical advice that she received. Can she further assure the Parliament or explain to the Parliament what weight she gave that advice from clinicians, as opposed to other evidence that she heard? I had a meeting with the local clinicians at the hospital and what I heard directly from them was compelling. It was about the fact that they would be able to provide better outcomes for those children and young people because of the range of back-up services that are at the state of the new children's hospital less than seven miles away. That is a very clear set of evidence and guidance to me. As a politician, I rely on that. Subsequent to that, the letter that the clinicians sent to me that I received this morning reiterated that and reiterated the importance that they saw of working with the families around the plans, particularly those families who have been on what we have called the open access arrangements. The clinical advice has been compelling. As a politician, I could not ignore that advice. That is the basis of my decision—nothing else. That is the basis of my decision, and that is why I had to make the decision that I have made. Jamie Greene, to be followed by George Adam. The cabinet secretary in her statement that both A and E departments at the RAHC and Inverclyde will continue to receive paediatric patients who self-present without explicitly stating that they will continue to receive and accept all forms of emergency cases, including those presented by ambulance. Can the cabinet secretary confirm that there are no plans to divert any emergency care from Inverclyde to the RAHC, or can she outline any scenarios under which the decision might be taken to instead take a patient to the RAHC instead of their nearest A and E? That already happens. The Scottish Ambulance Service already takes those children that will require the services of the Royal Children's Hospital, the new Children's Hospital, and they take them directly there at the moment. Those decisions will be made on the basis of the clinical decision making, depending on what the illness is of the children. Of course, when children are concerned, the risk is managed very carefully, indeed, so they will always err on the side of caution. That has always been the case for all our local hospitals. Where the state of the hospital is in Glasgow, of course, with all those back-up services, if they are not absolutely sure what is wrong with their child, they will always err on the side of caution and go straight to the children's hospital. I would have thought that people would understand that that is the right thing to do. However, I would reiterate in terms of self-referrous parents who turn up with their child, go through the door of the RAHC, or indeed any other local hospital. That will continue, as it is at the moment, and 86 per cent of those will be seen and treated within the Royal Alexandra hospital. I hope that that can reassure the member. George Adam is one of the main concerns that has been raised by my constituents. Can the cabinet secretary assure and reiterate that the plans are put in place for the open door families, including on transport links, before any service changes are made to world 15 at the RAHC? Can I say to George Adam that the issue that he raises is important because the families that he refers to on open access or open door arrangements are those families who have children with complex health needs. Therefore, what is important is that the plans that are put in place to make sure that continuity of care and treatment will be put in place—the board has given me that assurance—and the clinicians themselves who are involved in working with those children every day in the here and now have given me that assurance. I expect that there were arrangements to be in place before that change goes ahead and I would confirm that to George Adam. There is no getting away from the fact that the First Minister was asked in a TV debate whether the children's ward at the RAHC would close and she was clear that she would not close that ward. The cabinet secretary knows that there were proposals to close the ward before May 2016. The First Minister has given similar commitments to my local community about the Vale of Leven hospital and the vision for the Vale. Did she consult the First Minister about her decision? Was the First Minister copied into the minute of the decision? Was the minute ever circulated? That is fundamentally a matter of trust. The key question for me is whether we can now trust anything that the First Minister tells us. As I have said on three occasions, there was no proposal to close a particular ward that had come to us. The proposals only came to the Scottish Government on 14 March 2017, and that was the only point at which we saw the clinical evidence in favour of the decision. Given that the decision is based on clinical evidence alone, that is the first time that I saw that clinical evidence. The decision is, yes, Jackie, really, that was the first time that I saw the clinical evidence was after 14 March. Speaking to the local clinicians has been a fundamental part of my decision making. The decision is my decision as laid out and required to be my decision. Of course, the First Minister has been made aware of my decision and she accepts it fully. Claire Hawke had to be followed by Neil Findlay. Thank you, Presiding Officer. I refer members to my register of interests. I am a mental health nurse with an honorary contract with Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS. Given the welcome decision to reject the closure of Lightburn hospital, I would like to ask the cabinet secretary how she would expect the board and planning partners to take forward the provision of health and social care in partnership with the local community. I can say to Claire Hawke that a lot of work has to be done around Lightburn and around the hub. It was at a very early stage and not in a viable form to approve. However, in it is the concept of something quite good. I think that it is quite exciting the idea that you would have a range of local services not currently available in the east end of Glasgow under one roof under the model of a hub, but far more work on the detail is required. What I have said to the chair, as I expect them to take that forward now, in a way with the partners that they work with, particularly the local authority, but also the local community and organisations such as the local Parkinson's group. I would expect all those organisations and the local community to be fully involved in the development of a viable proposal for the future hub within east end of Glasgow. Neil Findlay, to be followed by John Mason. In 2016, Nicola Sturgeon said live on TV during an election debate that there was no plans to close the children's wars at the RAH in Paisley. For six years there have been staffing problems on top of staffing problems at St John's children's ward in Livingstone with assurances that it would not be closed. How can parents, children, grandparents and local people who join me on Friday at a protest at St John's believe a word the cabinet secretary or the First Minister says about the future of children's services in Livingstone, given their blatant betrayal of the people of Paisley? The only person who is talking about the closure of the paediatric ward at St John's is Neil Findlay, which is rather surprising. Can I say this about St John's? As he knows, a report from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health was received by NHS Lothian in October last year. It concluded that the preferred option for both it and NHS Lothian continued to be a 24-hour consultant and tier 2 cover model for St John's. The college recognised that the development of this model is a long-term solution that required a successful recruitment campaign of which NHS Lothian has been working very hard to do and has had quite a lot of success, as he knows well. I would have hoped that he would get behind NHS Lothian, where the clinical advice to me is that that is a service that should continue. There is no proposal that has come to me with clinical advice that the ward in St John's should close. I would have thought that Neil Findlay would be better placed in focusing on supporting his local hospital in the recruitment campaign rather than scare mongering, which at least he could put people off. It is a serious point, because if potential doctors are looking at whether or not to apply for a post that covers St John's, are they likely to be encouraged or not by what Neil Findlay is saying? I would suggest that he should be very careful in encouraging people to apply for those posts rather than the opposite. I am sure that that is what the local clinicians at St John's would be encouraging him to do. John Mason, I wonder if the cabinet secretary would agree that the key people for the health provision in the east end of Glasgow are the people of the east end of Glasgow. Would she also agree that, given the better transport links, Parkhead hospital site is the best place for a new hub and other health facilities? What I have said to the chair and the board is that, in taking the proposal forward and developing it into a viable proposition, they should continue to explore the parkhead and the light burn sites. What is important is that there is the development of something that can meet the needs not just of the existing local services in the east end of Glasgow but of what further services can be developed in one of the poorest communities in Glasgow. That is an exciting opportunity to do so, but it has to engage the local community properly, and that is the challenge that I have put back to the chair and the board. I thank the cabinet secretary and members for their contributions. That concludes our statement on major service change proposals.


This is stock number 11249. We are here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, your new and used Ram and heavy duty truck headquarters. Today we are checking out this super clean 2019 Ram 2500 Crew Cab Short Box Tradesman Package. This truck has a 6.4 liter V8 heavy motor. It has been fully safe to and inspected by our service shop has a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and tapped off. The truck has been gone through mechanically 100% and is 100% ready to go. Granite Crystal Pearl is the color we shoot all of our videos in 1080p 60 frames per second. So if you have HD capabilities on your computer tablet or smartphone device turn them on right now because it is your definitely your best way to check out the quality and condition of the truck before seeing it in person. And if you would like to check out all the photos on this truck in the upper right hand part of your screen is a link to our website click those or click that and check us out there. It comes with these steel rims with chrome covers and it has Firestone Transforce LT 27570 R18 tires. They have right around half the tread left on them maybe just a little bit under. Frame and underbody is an exceptionally nice clean condition. Front fenders in great shape I didn't see any dents or dings on that. It comes with the halogen head lamps which are nice and clear. The front bumper is in great condition. I didn't see any dents or dings on that. The hood is in really nice shape too. No dents or dings on there. Passengers side front fender same story very clean. And passengers side rim no scuffs or scrapes. As you go down this side of the vehicle take note of how clean the body is how reflective and mirror like that paint is. We take these HD videos so if you are far away or even if you're close by and you just cannot make the trip down you can still see the truck hear the truck and have confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before you even get here so that when you do get here there's absolutely no surprises and that's why we offer the Summit Auto Fastpass option in the upper right hand part of your screen. A link right to our website where you can apply for financing. Get pre-approved. See a payment quote. Even appraise the trade all from the comfort of your own home. So when you get here all you got to do is drive the truck. Love it. You'll be all set to go. Back rim is in nice shape as well. Back tires have just about as much tread as the front tires. And the frame and underbody other than a little bit of dust is in really nice shape. Didn't see any corrosion or anything under there. Has all the remaining factory exhaust and the lower rockers look pretty good as well. Bed rail covers on all the ram trucks. As we come around to the back the rear bumper is in great shape. No major dents or dings on that. Tailgate is in nice condition as well. I believe it is a locking tailgate. Locks with the doors. Has a spraying bed liner. Fifth wheel and goose neck prep package. Has these seven pin wiring back here as well. No major dents. Just a little bit of light duty usage on there. As we come around to the driver's side just as clean as that passenger side. No dents or dings on the box. And for full disclosure this back rim is in excellent shape as well. Down the rest of the side truck doors look really good. Didn't see any dents on them. Does have the fold out tow mirrors. Which fold out like so. They fold in like so. And they do have running lights on the side there. Inside the tradesman package gives you the work grade vinyl interior. Gray and black combo.  As we hop inside here turn the ignition on so you can see everything. 12,876 miles on there. Instrument cluster is very nice and clean. Steering wheel is in nice shape as well. Cruise controls on the right. Gear selector on the right. Bluetooth and information center controls on the left. Has the 8 speed automatic transmission. 4x4 shifter on the floor. You get an AUGS 2 USBs and 2 USB C's down there. And this one does come with the 8.4 4C radio, AM, FM, and Sirius XM radio capabilities. Also has backup cam which is very nice and crystal clear. And you got this plus here so you can zoom in right over the receiver hitch so you can get hooked up to your trailer, boat, or camper the first time every time. You also have your apps here and you can pair this one with your phone for Android Auto or Apple CarPlay to project to the screen. And it's really a cool system. We actually did a demo on Android Auto if you want to check that out. It's in the upper right hand part of the screen but if you've got like a navigation system on your cell phone you can project it to the screen and then use it through the screen so it's just like you have nav on there. Climate controls down there, factory brake controller, has six upfitter switches, tow haul, and stability control. Those floors are very clean, passenger side seat is an excellent shape as well. And the headliner is in really nice clean condition and you do get map lights up there. And there we go. Very nice shape. We'll take a quick look at the back seats and then we'll check out under the hood. The back seats are just as clean as the front seats. No rips, no tears back here. It does have the latch child safety system for any child car seats. Looks like there was possibly a car seat in here at one time on the passenger side. But those seats are in really nice shape. You get the heavy duty rubber floors back here as well. Storage underneath, got some alternative wiring back here and then a receiver hitch reducer. Side current airbags. And you do get the child safety locks on the back doors. We'll take a quick look under the hood and start it up. This is a push button start. And I would personally like to thank you for checking out the video today. And hopefully from this HD video, you will have been able to tell just how clean this truck is all the way around. Inside out. Under the hood we have the 6.4 liter V8 Hemi motor. The engine bay is in nice shape. Runs very smooth. Once again, this truck has been fully safety and inspected by our service op as a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off. And this truck is 100% ready to go. And to see more pictures of this truck or one of our other 450 new and used cars, trucks, SUVs, minivans, Wranglers, half tons, three-quarter tons, one tons. You name it, we got it. Go to our website right there www.SummitAuto.com. Full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle from two locations all at SummitAuto.com. And if you'd like to check out more HD videos, you can go to YouTube.com slash SummitAuto. Remember to like, subscribe, and share on this video and all the videos that you see there. In fact, in a second you will see a link to subscribe to our YouTube channel on your left. It links more Ram 2500 truck videos like this one on your right. If you have not been to our website on the bottom link to this vehicle on our website, click those checks out and we're super excited to help you with this really clean 2019 Ram 2500 crew cab short box tradesman and granite crystal metallic. Thanks again for checking out the video.


Okay, welcome to the webinar. This is Bruce at VeloxPro and we'll go through the order flow here within Bookmap and We're looking at Bookmap 6.1 and 6.0. I have 6.1 Loaded here, and this is the latest demo. It is the Bookmap for equities and you can go to bookmap.com here And find out more about it Actually, let me go through the risk disclaimer first Trading equities in futures involves substantial risk of loss is not suitable for all investors past performance is not indicative of future results More information go to bookmap.com Become a member and you have access to the free resources and then reach out to us at VeloxPro Support at VeloxPro.com So the new bookmap for equities is up and running It's going through the NASDAQ total view or DX feed and then NASDAQ total view And you can see some of the advantages here, and we've covered them for the last week or so great stuff It's an excellent data feed. You can read about it here. I can answer any of your questions as we go through the through the day here But this is where you can find it. It's under the pricing tab here And you can see that there is the basic the advanced and then this is these are packaged deals with the DX feed Okay, so if you're looking for just futures You can get the basic or advanced Here there is you subscribe monthly to it is 49 per month for the basic 99 per month for the advance They are billed quarterly, but you do get a 14-day trial period with them now That's with futures, but this both of these will also work with book map equities You'll just add the DX feed later. Okay, so you'll first subscribe to Bookmap and then you will subscribe to the DX feed the cost You'll get a 14-day trial period for both right for for both book map a book basic or advanced and as well You will get a 14-day trial period of DX feed Okay, so the distinction here is that there's book map and there's DX feed All right, so you get with both of these versions here, then you have that flexibility Now if you're new to book map and you specifically look at equities Well, then you might want to consider the package deal here. You get a little bit of a discount It's you get book map basic here with DX feed It's 99 per month billed quarterly and then the advanced book map advanced with the DX feed And that is 149 billed quarterly. All right, so Anyway, I know it sounds a little confusing here But I just think about it as separate subscriptions and then with this package deal, they're just bundled together Okay All right Let's move on here. Let's go into the Education tab here. I just want to show you where some of the resources are okay. There's these book map video snippets that We can click on these open it up and then open it up in our YouTube playlist here and you can see the entire list of all of the Videos that we have for Understanding the order flow. They're very short for the most part last one was almost five minutes But it goes in detail a little more detail here with absorption and exhaustion Flip of the book. You can see here. They're mostly about two or three minutes and good stuff we go through all of this Market phenomena every day here during these webinars. We just go through it in more detail Okay, so if you want the quick version watch these Understand it and then go back to your book map and you'll see it again and again all right So the recorded webinars there they are under this education tab right here Okay, we'll click on that that'll take you to the YouTube page as well And you can see all of them here. So if you want to review yesterday's you can see it here or the day before You can see it here. Now. In fact, that brings up a question or something. I wanted to show here And that was what we were looking at yesterday in Google. All right And I have the chart here for Google. Okay, so let's look at a five-minute chart Okay, this was the price action. We were looking at yesterday Okay, and what I just want to cover this because although I mean we did see some things in the chart and We covered it correctly Now in the end of the day here, we can see that price Kind of it, you know just kind of went sideways basically. I mean it did end. Let's see where did it end? So yeah, here's here's end of the day here Okay, and and we can see just right in the middle right right in the middle of all of this all of this volume here, right? So Anyway, the webinar we were looking right around this point here around this 86 level and And we were looking at the order flow All right, and we did see something first off. We were anticipating That order flow here. I've got a screenshot of it Okay, here's our 1130. All right We are anticipating at this point before this this move to the downside. We are anticipating it Because we're starting to understand the the transactions and the this this auction process here What the the traders were or how they were from? How they were behaving in the limit order book and where the transactions were taking place So we're looking for another push to the downside. It was at this point here around 1145 when we saw the cluster of volume up with the Higher level here and we saw them start to retreat on The offer here that we were starting to anticipate the move to the upside. We got it Okay, we got it up to this point right this little swing right here. Okay, and you can see that right in book map In the end the order flow it shifted yet again We saw one shift here We saw another shift here and here's the other shift in this area here Okay, and let's just go through how to read this. All right We'll do it again today. I mean we do this process every day but this was what we saw or the webinar ended and and We saw another shift in the order flow. Okay, look at the volume that started to take place up in these areas up here Okay, there's there's none on these two little peaks here, and there's some up here some buying But that was it right This these are areas of exhaustion That the there's there's no trading activity. The market is exhausting out It rotates back to find where it can trade where transactions previously took place As well as find liquidity Okay, so the market did rotate back look at the shift here Okay, we see them hitting the bid bid pretty aggressively in this area Took it down below these two swings right here. Okay, and we see significant volume trade now Below all of this other activity and we see another retest to where we broke from right here. Okay at this 988 40 level and nothing traded again exhaustion and we get the the Rotation and and follow through to the downside. Okay, so the the process In reading this order flow and seeing it in book map We see it again and again, right? So you'll need to to pay attention And put this into the way that you trade If you were bearish or bullish for that day, it depends. What was your time frame? What were your targets? Okay? this is What is very essential to understanding if you're scalping and looking for In Google it would just be for a couple of dollars.  All right if if if you if your orders are up here in line before or Whatever but you can see that price did go up into that area. All right now at this point here if you were looking for And that other you saw this other shift here. What was your target? Maybe you'd be targeting the lows targeting the lows down here, and you would have gotten it Okay, if you're looking at higher time frames, well, then you'll have to zoom out and you'll have to look at Something a little different, but the process is still the same. All right, just want to cover that and Just review what we were looking at yesterday And and go through it in a little more detail Okay, because we can see it here in the chart What we were looking for and you know really, you know to be honest, I mean my personal opinion We're chopping around until we're gonna get some data tomorrow. All right, we have the non-farm tomorrow All right, so that's that's what I believe is going on yet There are opportunities all day long and we see it in the order flow in book map Okay, so that's that I just wanted to cover that here Let's see Francisco Beautiful how your software draws exhaustion. Yeah, absolutely. I agree. It's it's all there and Showing exhaustion and absorption is book map is really good at Being able to display that for you Let's see nests DT and IQ For equities anytime soon. Not sure about that. I'm sorry. I just don't know What the the product roadmap is for that We're right now. I mean DT and IQ is not a broker. They're just a data feed Okay, so that's the same for DX feed right now the way that we are connecting. This is our initial offer Obviously, you know, we want to connect with brokers so you can actually trade Your funded account. So we're working on all of that. Okay? but this is our initial step here and And it is a good one. I'm really really happy and excited about this new direction with with equities the D the DX feed and the data that it shows is excellent and Very very insightful very powerful, I think the The data feed anyway. Oh one thing Ness about that You might want to check with DX feed from what I understand the technology They are using for equities will be phased out soon. They are not looking at NASDAQ total view Okay, they are looking at something else All right, so inquire them With them and you know get a little bit of insight. We are looking at NASDAQ total view and NASDAQ last trade Okay, so I hope that helps That's why I believe we're not supporting it is because I believe that was the reason is that it's just an older technology Okay, that will be phased out Okay, and Let's see Just looking up some stock twits this morning Just trying to look at what was moving. I did notice that there was a lot of activity here in Goldman Sachs So we can take a look at that Or we can take a look at maybe Bank of America here as well This looks pretty nice. I like that immediately. Look at how they're supporting price underneath here Okay, so on in the limit order book look at the other sides here. We don't we see very Few limit orders Okay, so right right away here I mean we do see big selling here, but this is looking pretty good for an extension at least maybe up into this 2250 or this high liquidity that is here at 48 2248 Okay Anyway, I got in a little late You can see just after 10 o'clock. I started collecting data here in book map and Reason being is that you know, I'm doing a lot of testing and Content generation so I didn't have the full book here to be able to or full Cache session to be able to display to you guys All right any questions anything you guys want to look at The See You can take a look at we can jump back to some of the futures On small caps. Yeah Ness, I think it's you it's gonna be limited to what you see here for the For the equities that we have Apple we have Amazon IBM Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Okay for futures. I have a lot of different feeds here to take a look at You know something that interests me. I'd like to show you is the Correlation tracker right because I do have I Have oil and I have our Bob gasoline. Okay, so these are these are you know Show this correlation tracker and how this works might be really really nice thing to to go over Okay, look at oil on the way up here. Wow. Okay big big move to the upside here And you can see all these limit orders here in the book and we see a lot of transactions take place As price is coming up into this 49 area here figure of 49 and we see a little bit of a continuation above it but We're right back down now to test this swing here and see if the buyers are are still engaged in Crude oil at the moment. Okay, so this is what I want to do. I want to show the correlation tracker Okay, and that will this is one of the add-ons here you get with the advanced package Okay, and we'll enable it. Okay, and let's add one here Okay, and let's add our Bob okay actually, let me Turn that into red Yeah, maybe pink. Maybe that's better. I'll show up a little bit better. Yeah, okay. All right. There we go Okay, so This is I mean these are heavily correlated. We're not looking quite at the crack spread here I'd have to add heating oil but they're they're very highly correlated and one usually leads the other depending on the environment and Let's we'll take a look here and see if we find any Any sort of a good price action? The moment See, I mean I see them very interested here on the On the bid I below this 49 90 here. Okay Okay, what about what about our Bob our Bob has been moving Okay And now it's starting to move to the downside Okay Interesting interesting to watch this Let's see Regret we can yeah, we can look at the the bonds Yeah, yeah, absolutely these correlations. It's great to see that we can we can see they're they're correlating pretty nice They don't see any really any big divergences here yet in in price I Would say here you do see it maybe in this little area here Because we can see that Here we have a nice cluster of activity And you can see that oil actually continued to the upside right and our Bob did not until Until later until this point here Okay, so and and then you can see that Our Bob is now breaking down along with oil. Okay, so Perhaps at some of these levels here, this is where the correlation tracker would have given you something something to go on we can see that oil continued on up to the upside and In our Bob had not at this point, right? So if if you guys are, you know, depends on how you trade There's all sorts of opportunities here At one of these points up here above the figure we're above the 49 figure you can Short oil up into some of these areas here with this high liquidity and then by our Bob, okay, and I trade the spread right and leg in to each position and then when you have Your your profit or your targets in in line here then look to take your Take that trade off Okay, our Bob continues to the downside right now oil had gone up So this might be a shorting opportunity here for oil Okay, and it would have worked out pretty nicely. You would have already gotten five cents Okay, we're gonna retest right back to that area here Let's zoom out just a little bit more Okay, so our Bob is finding support down here though. I mean you can see that I mean these correlations I mean they do give nice nice signals But you got to be on your toes Unless you're unless you really zoomed out and you're looking at something a little bit bigger It really depends on on on your On your time frame All right, so now oil is back up So is our Bob Okay, but look at look at how our Bob made a lower low here compared to oil So there's another discrepancy and in the correlation Okay, oil is making a high oils that just definitely stronger today than than our Bob So maybe maybe be looking for our Bob to catch up now. So maybe you'd want to buy our Bob And and maybe short oil All right, let's let's see what unfolds here. Anyway Let's not I don't want to focus too much on the correlation tracker I want to go through our process of reading the order flow and integrating it into the higher time frames This is what we do And this is what gives us really good insight To these these price levels here. Okay, so let's continue on here We'll integrate this macro view of oil into the microstructure Okay, and then and then we're gonna look at the order flow in detail Okay, this is what we we've been doing every day during these webinars and we'll just continue on here. All right Okay, so Let's let's jump into oil Okay Unfortunately, I didn't have my other charting platform open at this time That this is this will do the trick for for just the moment here Okay All right. Okay, so this 49 level pretty important in oil as we can see Okay, and maybe even maybe a little bit higher 4908 Significant volume here and we're looking for to see if we're gonna come up into that previous volume area You can see that it has accepted for a while now below that Okay, but the buyers are are engaged here. All right. We're making making some higher highs here and This so this is our level of interest are this 4905 the high of the day Okay, and then other areas of interest are going to be down This 4861 or so. Let's look at a five-minute chart now Other than that, this has been a really strong move to the upside. All right, so Let's take a look again Yeah All right. Yeah, oil is strong. All right Okay So coming up to our 4905 now, let's let's start to put that together of that macro view with our microstructure and our order flow We're seeing a lot of volume trade at this higher high here. I'm looking for continuation to the upside and We can see that not too much selling down in some of these little areas here compared to the volume that is trading at the higher highs here, okay, and You know what else? Okay, so what about that that limit order book? Okay, wait, where are they and That's our process here By reading the order flow and Looking at it very objectively. Okay, where are the majority of the participants and How do those participants behave as price approaches them? and Then we want to read the tape. Okay, where the transactions are occurring. So let's let's go through that process here Okay, we see that there were limit orders here. Here we go with our move to the upside okay, okay, we're at highs of the day here for CL Okay Looking at this 4910 level. That's where we see the liquidity in the book Hey, what about on the bid? Where are they? Hey, they're worried yet. They're way down here All right, they're down here at 48 78 Yeah, I will probably see some guys get interested again at Because you can see they were here earlier at 48 90 And we see them actually getting aggressive now At 96 okay jumping in the book. Hey look at them jump underneath here they 160 contracts or so and Looking for aggressive aggressive buying now to charge right up into our 4910 level Okay, and there we go and then right back down to where we broke from And now let's see if we get more buying in again here right at that swing Okay, we still have more more volume trading at higher highs right, okay, I'm gonna open up also another Indicator here that we have our cumulative volume Delta Okay, okay, we're getting a shift here now in the order flow Okay, look at the transactions that are occurring here more volume trading at the lower lows Okay, we just made a lower low here and and we see a lot of a lot of red dots down in that area Okay, so we're getting a shift so now I'm actually I'm looking for continuation and I'm looking for Targeting maybe some of these areas down here around this 4880 area All right, do you guys understand that shift? Do you understand what I'm looking at? Okay, I mean this is it constantly changes. I mean we might even get another shift right here And we might be looking for now a move to the upside Okay, it shifts again and again. I mean this is this is tricky All right, I look at the look at the volume here that just traded buyers are jumping back in So we're getting a battle in this area here right at right below 49. This is a key level Okay, it was this volume here and also these little points of exhaustion here That I was reading that I'm looking for that continuation to the downside That shifted here again for me as well. So, you know, I'm I'm staying out of this. I would not This is confusing in this complex looking for something a little simpler Right This this this cluster of volume here through throws me off Right, whereas before these were it was looking pretty good We saw the clusters of volume here at these higher highs And I'm looking for that continuation and then here we get the shift Okay red dots more volume at a lower area We have points of exhaustion looking for a continuation to the downside and then here The buyers stepped in okay, and that picture changed yet again Okay, so this is this is pretty tricky price action to read And and now now it looks I mean if we you could be scalping this going back and forth all day But it looks now it now it looks good for a move to the upside Right because look at this cluster of volume above this swing here at 49 Okay, are we starting to accept above 49? And it's looking pretty good Right now we just need to see a lot of green dots. Okay more volume At a higher level here, okay, and then we'll finally probably hit our 49-10 level Okay, what about the book where they lined up there if you're at 05 and they're here at 848 99 So this is this is the battle here. It's for the figure here at 49 Let's see any insight from our Bob or how about our cumulative volume Delta Not really Kind of kind of difficult to read here. Not the clearest Okay, I mean we can see that our Bob did not make higher highs here as oil did so oil is definitely stronger Let's see reading your full. How would you? softwash Show up volatility Yeah, volatility is actually very easy to read as well in in book map You'll you will just see that a Lot of these orders here. This is pretty there's pretty thick for for oil, you know to see hundreds of contracts At at some of these levels is pretty pretty good Usually it's in the tens or the high tens Or maybe the low hundreds, but these these areas are you know, there's a lot of interest here All right With volatility though, you're gonna see this book really thin out you instead of maybe you'll see it in the Low tens or even single digits For oil and you'll see very erratic price movement Okay, and and it's nice actually to see that volatility because the book You'll see that the Liquidity will be up at some of these levels or down at some of these levels here, and there'll be nothing in between Right and that's when you get that volatility because it's searching for liquidity and it find is finding them at extremes Okay, in fact, that's kind of what it looks like in stocks almost all the time So let's let's zoom out here a little bit in Amazon That's what's so great about looking at these equities here is You know here here are these levels of high liquidity in Amazon these blocks here of liquidity and You know and we don't see We see some activity, you know on the on the best bid and offer That some algo activity here moving price around or shifting price around especially like underneath here but the You know, you'll you'll see that this This other area other areas of liquidity here, you know become rather insignificant. We're looking at the bigger blocks Of liquidity and liquidity providers Okay, here we go here. We go with oil now see notice the Okay, that that shift right that we're looking for right we're getting it here yet again Okay, more volume trading to the upside and and now we're finally testing our 4910 level Okay, so Francisco all of those guys that We're looking for that continuation to the downside in this area They would be trapped here and are probably covering up here all right So let's let's draw on our horizontal line here. Okay, some something like this Okay, that shift happened here Okay, we noticed it. Okay, we noticed the shift. We noticed the shift here We noticed the exhaustion and we noticed the shift yet again here And then and then we saw this this price structure break these little swings here And we're looking for green dots and then and we see the follow-through now all right, okay so Yeah, pretty pretty quick moving here And we're kind of all over the place But I think you guys are getting the point here of what I'm covering with these shifts in the order flow or the transactions And in the limit order book You know oil. Yeah, I mean we're it's still, you know this these principles Still are very true in oil It's just that I Have noticed this personally that With oil there seems to be a lot more aggressive trading with market buys and sells Instead of compared to the S&P where you'll see these areas of liquidity High liquidity You know has more seems to have more an effect on price a different markets different ways of trading here, okay, so I keep that in mind and Yeah, look at look it again. I mean we're all over the place here oil had made that high or high Okay, 49 15 area here and look at now We're starting to get another shift in that liquidity at below this area here We can even adjust our line now and we can move this up a little bit Okay, and there we go. There's the follow-through. All right. I can't even it's not you know I'm not even quick enough to Adjust that line and we already see the follow-through to the downside All right, but we noticed it right we noticed it right here Okay so this is Yeah, pretty pretty volatile Period back banging back and forth here in oil Okay, but it was right here where we had the insight Okay before this 15 cent move to the downside. Okay, and we have more volume trading at a lower low here okay, so Yeah, if we follow through with it. We're looking for continuation to the downside Again still in oil. All right based on the transactions. We're looking at okay where that volume is trading I'm looking for that continuation and there we go There it is And this is moving really quickly Okay, so I was just mentioning it here around 48 84 or so something like that And we did get that follow-through Yeah, it's something's going on. I'm not sure what the what the news is But something's going on Okay, but this is pretty wicked. We're getting a lot of Trap traders and a lot of covering a lot of knocking people out below these swings and above these swings here Okay Anyway, here's a phenomena that we see all the time as well a return back to where we just broke from at our 48 84 level here right Yeah induction, you know advertising lower prices You know in the market market theory market auction theory You know, however, however you want to describe it Okay, okay I mean, it's all over the place, but Let's take a look now. What do we see now? I mean now I'm starting to see look at them in the limit order book here Okay, pretty aggressive Wanting to be buyers above the swing Okay at and above the swing here and we're seeing a lot of a lot of buying here a lot of buying interest all of a sudden starting to step in Okay, look at the green. Look at the color of these transactions here or the The Delta of these transactions we see a bit more buying than we do selling Okay, and we can verify that we'll just I'll zoom in here and I'll put this Activity within my chart range and we can look at our CBD here Accumulative volume Delta Okay, we can see it pick up in some of these areas here. Okay, so we see a little bit more aggressive buying in this area right here all right yeah auction market theories and it's an excellent thing to see in book map because it truly is an auction and This is the advantage that Book map can Offer you is because here's the auction right. It's all in the limit order book and We take that auction and then we record it and historically Present it to you on the chart here Okay, so we know that this is where they were before and this is where they still are This is where they want to buy right in the current book They want to sell up here at 80 and 81 and they want to buy down here at 72 All right, that's the condition right now of the current market The majority of the players are between it, you know these areas here. Look at there There's our shift. Look at our shift in the Wow, we're just banging all over the place here. There was a shift right here Okay, looks like maybe they're trying to press price into these 157 contracts here, but they jumped right back out and We're actually now above that little area here. Okay now we're testing these guys up here at 81. Yeah, absolutely looking at auction market theory like You you can really I think it better visualizes it than well anything else. I've seen is is being able to Show you Not only where they are currently but where they were previously and to see if they're still engaged at those areas Okay, let's see if we get another shift of the book right here in this area or shift in the transactions Okay, I'm looking for and why am I saying that because I want to see like you can see them here on the offer at this 81 area that we recognized just a few minutes ago Let's see if they flipped over to the other side. Okay, they were here on the on the offer now They're on the bid. Okay. This is a flip of the book Now, let's see if we get big green dots here and we'll charge right up into 4890 and There we go. Okay Come on. Just a few more a few more ticks here Hit for 4890 See if we get it, but do you guys can you guys see that? Do you see that flip of the book here? Okay? This is Something you're gonna see again and again in book map It's just how the markets work. In fact, this is very objective information We made a video about it. I can show that video here for you Or I can at least give you the link for it. So just a minute here Okay, so look in your chat there and go to webinar And this is a flip of the book And we're witnessing a flip of that right now. Okay. Now we're testing that 4890 level Okay, that we were looking at previously And looking good here, right? Okay, I mean you can see how quickly this is changing. This is a kind of kind of insane, but Nonetheless the the principles are holding true. Okay, so let's cover that let's cover that phenomena here that flip of the book Watch that video. I think that'll be helpful for you But I can click on the hand tool we can hover over this area and I'm gonna zoom in and we can see the flip here okay Here they were on the offer at 81 Hey, we come up into that area They pull liquidity not much trades up here And but look what they actually flipped down below here at 78 But then here right at the same price level as soon as we start to trade up above 81 they jump right back in at 81 here, but they're not on the offer now. They're on the bid And then we were looking for those green dots in that continuation to the upside Right, and we got a nine cent gain out of that Okay, a little bit more 10 cent gain Okay, so you can see how Today's a little a little quicker than than than usual, but you can see how This can help you Understand what's going on at these price levels. This is not going to show up in a regular chart You're not gonna be able to see that flip All right Okay, any questions on that? You know we can go over this in detail if you guys if you guys like All right. Well, what do we see now? I mean Still I mean we've traded above our 81 level Okay, or 80. It's more like maybe 83 here 83 84 level Actually, and that's exactly the level we were looking at previously to be honest Let me draw in another line here Yeah, this is where we saw that drop. We were looking for that continuation to the downside right here Okay, and and you can see we came right back up to test it again, and then we saw the flip Right in here, and then we see that now this is the we're are we accepting volume above this area here? at 82 83 area Okay, all right. Anyway some good scalping activity today And you can see that we've been reading it pretty nicely Seeing the looking for that continuation. We got it looking for that Continuation here up to 4890. We got it. We saw the Over here didn't quite get it. I was looking for that Continuation to the downside in this area here based on very objective information We saw but then we saw the flip or I'm sorry. We saw the transactions Tell us something differently by reading that tape. Okay at this point here We were looking then for that continuation to the upside. Okay, and you can see that we got that as well All right, so man, you would have been long short long short long short etc but anyway The the process is of reading this is is holding very nicely Okay Well, let's jump back and take a look at a few equities just for kicks. I'm still interested in Goldman Sachs Ah Nothing, it's just been in a big range. What about our Bank of America? Okay, let's let's zoom out there because that looked pretty good early on We're in this area here what looked really interesting here So what what occurred here we saw the support here and very aggressive underneath here with the limit by orders Boy, we only moved a few cents really So now now we can see that they're pretty aggressive here on the offer All right I think we covered the the right market then because Not not seeing too much interesting stuff here in either Bank of America or or Goldman Sachs What about Apple? What does Apple look like? all over the place too and What about our Amazon that we've been covering here? Okay, interesting stuff in Amazon. Look at the flip nice flip of the book here. Okay. Look at 9 95 Here on the offer Now here on the bid Volume and price and time accepting up in this level above 95 All right, and what about transactions? Do we are we seeing something change in the order flow and right now? I'm not really I'm not seeing a lot of big red dots at these lower areas here Okay, now that may change but from what I'm looking at and seen so far I would start to anticipate this 90 9650 level here to be tested next. All right All right guys, well, let's let's wrap it up. We'll call it a day If you guys want to give book map a try in that 14-day trial period Go to book map comma under the pricing tab here. You can ask us at Support at Velox Pro as well and we'll be happy to help you but anyway, it's an interesting stuff to see in oil and Yeah, have a good day and we'll catch up with you guys tomorrow. Bye. Bye