It's great to be here. Thank you all for coming out. It's a very big topic. And inequality is not something that we can talk about easily. But before we start talking about inequality, I think we have to start with the position of Auckland is an amazing city. It has a huge amount of potential, and there are many opportunities. So we're not starting from a place of no hope, but a place fulfilled with hope, but clearly in the knowledge that things are not perfect. One of the biggest issues is even the Auckland is growing, even though there are more jobs and incomes on average are rising. What's absolutely clear is that the rising tide is not lifting all. And ultimately it is around the aspects of it, aspects of that exclusion that is where we have to really focus on. We know that the reasons why there is this exclusion and these differences that are growing, some of them are outside of control, but there are also some that are as a result of policies and policy neglect that we have had for the last 30 odd years. In my mind, Auckland is a city that is increasingly divided. When we look at it for those who have good jobs versus who don't, those who have short commits to work versus who don't, those who own a home versus who don't. And the statistics that Alan talked about, I think highlighted that not only are these gaps real, but in many cases these gaps are drawn within geographies of our city, that we are creating different parts of Auckland that are in fact not talking to each other. I love the quotes that you started with Alan, because I think it really spoke volumes in terms of where we are starting from. Right now there is such an exclusion between the rich and poor in New Zealand that we cannot empathise with the pain and suffering that's going on. We are more likely to blame them for being poor, we are more likely to punish them for being homeless, and we are more likely to penalise and be happy with a system that is grudging and unfair. But we also know that not everything is because of policies, and we have to know that the backdrop of what is happening in terms of the differences and the growing gaps that we see across New Zealand, a lot of it is because of things that are completely outside of the control. Brexit for me was a moment of watershed. What it showed was the inequalities that are growing within our communities and now have gotten so big that the excluded are now the majority. And this really matters because for me, Brexit was very much a vote against globalisation, a vote against neoliberalism, it was a vote against growth in some cases. And it was also a vote of old versus the young, of the educated versus the uneducated, it was the provinces versus the cities. Not just in New Zealand, not just in Auckland, we're living in a community that is divided and those differences really matter. When I think about the forces that are creating the changes, it's very much around the big shifts in technology globalisation, which we'll talk about in the upcoming series. And I encourage you to go and engage with those because I think the drivers of it are extraordinarily important. But today, what we're talking about is the result of those changes. And the result of those changes is our labour markets have become more polarised. Our cities are defined by very highly skilled jobs and very unskilled jobs. And it's those that polarisation between skills, between incomes, between job opportunities and essentially your access to quality of life. The middle is hollowing and this really matters. The rich and educated live increasingly in segregated parts of Auckland. The last census was quite interesting to see because what we saw was poverty was being concentrated in certain parts of Auckland, generally far away from services, far away from amenities. We could be kind about why that is happening but we think, I think we know what we should call it. It is called the ghettoisation of Auckland and it is completely unacceptable. A lot of what is happening in terms of this ghettoisation is not just because of the insecurity that we see in the labour market, whether in terms of the types of jobs or what it takes to participate in the hiring jobs. It's also about a housing market that is fundamentally broken. Our Prime Minister was on radio a couple of days ago saying that it's always been hard for people to buy houses in Auckland, Bolshevik. When you've got this kind of denial, when the average house price in Auckland is a million dollars, is ridiculous. We've got politicians bickering over whether we should call it a challenge or a crisis. I don't care, we just need to fix it. Housing has become so expensive that it is having serious consequences on the quality of people's lives and it is creating big differences that are becoming more and more entrenched, not only across generations, but between communities and across communities. We know that what's been happening in terms of this inequality in housing is not something that's going to be solved quickly. This is something that's been growing for many decades. When we look at the falling home ownership rate in New Zealand, whether it's in South Auckland or across New Zealand, it really all started in the early 1990s, which was the peak of home ownership rate in New Zealand and it has been falling since then. Today it's the lowest rate since 1956. So this is not a crisis that is new. This is not a crisis that is about what has happened in the last five years or the last 10 years. This is something that has been the result of policy failures that have accumulated over many decades. The mistakes are old, the blame has to be shared across many and the solutions have to be across many different things. One of the biggest frustrations for me is that when we talk about housing or around education or around welfare, people present one solution, one single way of fixing things and the reality is there are no simple fixes. The complexity of the drivers of where and how we've got the inequalities in our city are massive and they're hard to unpack and that's why they're hard to solve. But it doesn't mean that we should engage in a practice of blame for one group. Quite often it is the council because they're very easy to blame, their communications team is not very good at biting back. It's about the building sector because they don't do enough. It's about the land bankers, it's about social housing. We're not building enough social housing. It's about renting policies that are rubbish. It's about tax policies that are rubbish. It's about foreigners. We like that one in particular. It's about migrants. It's about all of those things and the reality is that it doesn't matter what the reason is. We know there is enough work out there for us to know that we kind of understand what's happening in the housing market. It's really complex. It's a lot of different drivers and we have to do a lot of things to fix it. But we also know the consequence of that is quite significant. Not only are we seeing that in terms of the rising pressures on the poor in our society and we've seen that this year with the rising media reporting of homelessness. But we also know that there's increasing pressures on young workers in a city like Auckland for teachers, for teachers' aids, for nurses, for police. For all of those services, it is becoming harder and harder. Auckland has the highest average household income of all the regions in this unit. I wanted to take you into account that buying that dream land of a million dollar average house, the disposable income is the lowest of all our regions. Auckland's meant to be our most competitive city. This is meant to be our one big hope of competing with cities around the world. How are we going to do it when we can't even give enough disposable income for people in this city, even with very good incomes, to live their lives in dignity? The inequalities that we're opening up are opening up across so many different lines. These fault lines are going to become massive. We're going to be affecting the quality of life, our ability to offer services, our city's competitiveness. We're going to see increasing ghettoization and gated communities amongst the rich. This is New Zealand, I want to live in. And the challenges of growing gaps and separation, they won't be easy to solve. But we also know what the solutions are. And I think the technical solutions are not where their problem is. That is not the roadblock, that is not the challenge. The challenge is where we start from. We know that education has to be improved and Alan had some great ideas there. And one of the biggest tragedies that I see is the differences in terms of education outcomes across ethnicities, across geographic locations, across family backgrounds, across access to housing, whether you're renting versus owning. All of these things are not new. And nor are they new or different for New Zealand. They were not unique and neither are the solutions. For me, the mechanics are not the problem. For me, the problem is always the politics. Why and what values do we hold ourselves up to? How do we measure ourselves? And what is it that we want for our society? Over the last 30 years, we have placed competition and individualism on a pedestal. We judge people and ourselves and society amongst metrics that I think make us extraordinarily selfish. And it makes us very difficult to care about others. And the natural result of it has been massive carving out of communities, exclusion, whether it's drawn across lines of ethnicity, of poverty, of education, of where you live, what car you drive, whatever it might be. Ultimately, the conditions that we have today for politics is not conducive to collectivism. It is not conducive to caring. And certainly, it is not conducive to having the word love in the conversation. Ultimately, I think what we're seeing with inequality is an acceptance that it's okay for people to miss out. I worry because what we're seeing in Auckland is that it is not going to be okay. Because very soon, it will be the majority who are excluded. If we don't want to live in a city and in society that is wrapped by jealousy and by hatred and by division and exclusion, the only way that we can overcome it is not with economics, not with public policy, but with politics that embraces a much different way of doing things. We know what to do, what we need is leadership. And we need to have a caring attitude to actually fixing the issues that have been so clearly in front of us and growing for the last 30 years. Thank you.


That was the promise Pike Judge Executive Bill Deskins made last week regarding the closure of the Phelps and Marlbone Senior Citizen Centers. This week however, Deskins could promise no such thing. I said I was going to open up two senior citizen centers and they said no, they didn't have no money. Following a meeting Wednesday between some of the members of the Pike Fiscal Court and the Pike Senior Citizens Board, Deskins said his hands are tied since the senior citizen centers are operated and managed by the senior's board. He also said he has no authority at this time to terminate the county's appointee to the board, Diane Thacker, who has been blamed for the centers being closed by the board, nor does he plan to do so. The board told me the good job she was doing, so what am I going to do? Outside of the meeting, a large group of senior citizens from the Phelps Center awaited word of the explanation given by the senior's board to county officials of why the centers were closed, short of saying it was a budgetary measure, they received no explanation other than Deskins saying the board exercised their authority in closing the centers. Those in attendance were not satisfied with that explanation. We just don't understand what's going on.  They just want an answer, that's all they want. They're taxpayers, they're, you know, law-abiding citizens. Deskins said he wants to help, but can't because the board is an entity unto itself. I want to see the citizens have whatever they need, but the money's short, and I think it may get worse, so I don't know. Tempers flared after the meeting when one person questioned Deskins' honesty to questions regarding an alleged tie between Deskins' wife and Diane Thacker, Deskins physically threatened that man. Deskins said afterwards that he made a mistake. You will not answer eight questions directly. Just like Kim, he asked you yes or no. I don't know. I'll tell you right now, I don't believe you. I got a book in there I follow. What does that have to do with your wife being friends with her? They ain't playing to me, buddy. You know who, you keep who friends who you want to. I know who my friends are, yes. Now you say a whole lot more and I get over and kick your rump. Well, I tell you what, there's not much standing in between us. I don't say I never made a mistake. I don't know anybody that hasn't made one much in a while. The seniors were told that the senior citizens board will meet next Monday, and they should attend that meeting if they want their voices heard. Magistrate Hillman-Dotson, who was present Wednesday, said that is the best course of action for the Phelps seniors at this point. I would imagine that these people would be at that meeting to find out where we're going. Reporting in Pikeville for EKB News, I'm Chris Anderson.


Hello everyone, welcome back to another session in dentistry and more. So we are continuing our dental anatomy sessions. So today's session is about mantibular central incisor. Mantibular central incisor as you all know they are two in number right and left and the central incisor and lateral incisor are similar in anatomy and complement each other in function. They are smaller than the maxillary central incisors and mantibular central incisor erupts between the age of 7 to 8 years. Now we'll see our system that is universal, Zygmunti system that is Zygmunti Parma system and FTA system. Universal it will be 24 and 25 because this starts from here 1, 8, 9, 16, 17, 20, 24, 25, 32. In Zygmunti system it is 1 and 1 and FTA system it is 3, 1 and 4, 1, 3 and 4 are the quadrant the left lower and the left right quadrant and 1 is the central incisor. And the chronology first evidence of calcification by 3 to 4 months, crown completion by 4 to 5 years, eruption by 7 to 8 years and root completion by 10 years. And the dimension the crown length is 9, root length is 12.5, mesiodistal diameter at contact area is 5 and 3.5 at cervix, the labilingule is 6 and 5.3 and the curvature on the mesial is 3 and distal is 2 millimeter. So we'll start with the labile aspect. So can see the picture. The labile surface of mandibular incisor is very small, narrowest tooth mesiodistally of all permanent teeth and it is bilaterally symmetrical. Both mesioincisal and distal incisal ankles are very sharp and it is the only incisor where both mesioincisal and distal incisal ankles are sharp and at right ankles. Now the lingual aspect. The lingual aspect is concave from incisal edge to the cervical line, singulum is smooth and barely visible and the shallow lingual fossa and the smooth singulum can see here. The surface is smooth without any grooves and no other tooth in the mouth except the mandibular lateral incisor shows so few developmental lines and grooves. So we don't have many features in mandibular central incisor but as a mesial aspect the labile outline is almost straight except near the cervical third where it is convex. So the lingual margin is like S shape. The cervical line on the mesial and distal surface is convex and sizely you can see the S shape lingual surface and the contact area and the labile surface is inclined lingually whereas the distal aspect the distal surface is very similar to the mesial surface but the cervical line is less curved and contact area is almost at the incisal third just like the mesial side. Now the incisal aspect. This aspect illustrates the bilateral symmetry of the tooth. The labilingual diameter is greater than the mesio distal and the newly erupted teeth choose mammolones which wear off upon the mastication. Mammolones are like three small lobe like structures which is seen on the newly erupted teeth. Now the root sinkle and straight from labile or lingual view the root is generally symmetrical and tapers gradually to relatively a sharp apex. From mesial or distal view the root is much wider and it is slightly convex cervical apically on both labile and lingual merchants and the central portion of mesial and distal surface is usually flattened or concave but the cross section at nick outline is roughly a rectangle with rounded corners but it's slightly wider at labile than the lingual when there are root concave it is present they are reflected as concave it is in the mesial and distal outlines. The main root cross section is similar to the cervical section but only more avoidant shape. So basically the question will come the difference between maxillary central and mandibular central incisor. In maxillary central incisor the crown is wider mesiu distally than labiolinguli but here it is crown wider labiolinguli than mesiu distally. In maxilla the lingulfosso is pronounced often with lingual pit here it is shallow without groove so pit and in maxilla there is more prominent singulum and marginal ridges they are not prominent in mandibular. Now the comparison between mandibular central and lateral incisor so that is also again a common question on labial aspect the symmetry it is bilateral on central but lateral it is asymmetrical. The mesio incisor and distal incisor ankle are sharp in central but rounding in mesial and more rounded in distal incisor angle. But the contact area is all at incisal, mesial or distal irrespective of the teeth and incisal aspect the incisal ridge from right ankle with labiolinguli bisecting line but incisal ridges twisted on crown with respect to the lateral incisor. So that is all about mandibular central incisor so form of difference between maxillary central and mandibular central or mandibular central and mandibular lateral just like the maxillary central incisor. So that is all about mandibular central incisor it is a very small tooth similarly very small features very few features there is no much features on the labial lingual or mesial and incisal side because it is the smallest tooth in the oral cavity but question might come with regard to the comparison with lateral or maxillary central incisor. So I'll come up with mandibular lateral incisor my next session thank you.


Good morning, everyone It's Wednesday December 20th 2023 got a little bit of red finally coming in Dow down a hundred and that's that down 36 in an S&P down 11 So everything down roughly a quarter of a percent Which you figure that had to happen at some point here. It's been We're crazy run upward here last couple months. So we will see if this continues today Or see if it's just all pre-market stuff and then Everything's gonna head back up into the green Bell's gonna ring here About 15 seconds Microsoft pushing up and there is the bell We got good PayPal Walmart starting in the green and Coinbase Intel Microsoft and Baba Then else red so we will see Where things go we we can get a nice runner volume runner like we did in Boeing yesterday Interestingly enough the VIX is down half a percent Futures kind of pushing up Amazon pushing up so got a little two-way action going on here and Surprised to see the VIX down like it is so kind of some wacky stuff going on here Everything's staying in the red so far in terms of the indices Baba pushing up. It's kind of looking to see What it looks like to enter a zero DTE iron condor here in the first five minutes, but Still not sound a premium The VIX being down We're in bubble B and getting our second Bar here now so we will see what type of volume comes pouring in more pushing up You know a few more stocks going green That says is your entry criteria for the OT Ah, yeah, I mean at the in the mornings most of the time and so If it's like midday it could be different and it is definitely different different during the last hour of the day So the exit criteria I just I scale out at 20 percent 40 percent 60 percent profits and then I've got that trailing stop at 75 percent that Of the price I got filled so it's just it's no different than what Steve teaches and zero DT course for the morning iron condor It's just the exact same thing Kind of midday. I looked it kind of it could be I just look at like maybe sometimes 25 points wide 30 points wide 40 points wide just kind of pens what kind of Feel like I can get I don't like getting in unless It's over five dollars of premium and the power hour is kind of like four dollars You picked I picked the strikes closest to four dollars and that's Exactly what Steve teaches in that power hour iron condor or straddle sometimes teachers pushing up High as a day Some big pushes up here now by some of these stocks Not really seeing anything Get a minute left. I'm not really sure what you're referring to their skywing. I Mean my charts have been like this right for three years honestly, so I Just they're just set up just like the course So I'm not real sure on that Yeah, it's been three years ago. So that I set these charts up So I it's not something I've revisited since I set them up. So I'd have to do some Yeah, it's not even an option. I'd have to go back into the settings And setting up the Orion charts Maybe maybe you're maybe you're thinking about thinkorswim Yeah, you're probably thinking about thinkorswim See this is the thinkorswim setup. So it's different. This is a this is Orion So you're probably thinking this this is what my thinkorswim does use on in 80 days So totally different broker Yeah, so I'm sure that something to do with it.  It's And time axis it is a set of 180 days. So Guessing that's that's the reason it's a different broker different settings. All right So no up no volume runners out of the gates. I'm just gonna be patient here Where's the mighty 90s here? Well, let's keep pushing up and see if we get some mighty 90 shorts on any of these Popping up already Nothing really FDX had did they get earnings? Yeah, nothing really nothing was shaking kind of a quiet day so far here Yeah, you wouldn't enter emu. It's bounced it It bounced before it got higher than that previous one. So You would only want to get in that if it had come all the way down Push in lows When it ended here square Trying to hold on here Man some tech stocks really strong here That's that still in the red No big volume bars really of any kind Never really seen that before Easily you know one or two Anyone posting trades? I would assume so we don't We don't have I don't have any trades yet. I've not seen a good setup yet and Netflix Just straight up square coming down if it comes down to this pivot I might go long and see if it can Mean it's strong today Up a little under a percent It's kind of holding above that pivot kind of what Boeing did yesterday Although Boeing did have a big volume bar Yeah, I mean I probably would play it as an upside continuation nice push-up.  Wow flushing So square, I mean You could get in long here if it goes through the pivot then you could bounce on it Yeah, if I do that bar make it as big as the first So I probably wouldn't play that as a mighty 90 Roblox getting a bar as big as the first. I'm just gonna hang tight here for a second because You know the markets have been so strong Would not be surprised if some of these stocks pull back a little bit here in the morning And then maybe rebound a little bit Yeah, by these biggest first Just not seeing Yeah, Pete on downside volume runner if you want a small stock to trade used to trade Pete on all the time when it was Price tire hmm Tesla just shooting up Tesla Netflix just don't pull back whatsoever Just not seeing anything. I like at the moment all the indices still in the red But we have some things pushing Nasdaq though is getting close to going green So Nvidia push up pull back to yesterday's high Wondering if it was going is going to continue upward check and video here Morning Dax. Yeah, Bob. It's not enough volume separation there You need more separation off. You remember that. What was it? Nvidia yesterday how it had the clear separation. That's Those are the times to take those not when it's just barely bigger. So then you see a little two-way action here Got some pushing up some coming down Future is not moving much from at the moment and video was gonna they came back down to yesterday's high I was gonna look to getting long Amazon kind of hold on here So just just not any signals really in terms of volume No good clear-cut mighty 90s no good clear-cut runners volume runners Tesla and the bar is not gonna get as big as the first It's getting close so in video like look at a little Continuation up if it could come down just a little bit more hopefully doesn't leave without me here Big bar and Airbnb and video is kind of leaving without me. Take a look at Airbnb Let's see. So I might get short here Airbnb We using the two days to expiration option chain We trade the 143 puts Little to $1.27. So I had a little bit of a bounce there. I just wanted to jump in quick So NVIDIA is coming down now But I'm not so sure it might push through that Yesterday's high so I'm gonna keep an eye on that. I would close half of my Airbnb at I'm gonna close half right now here Fill it a buck 45 to close half. Yes, I'm gonna kind of I don't think I'm gonna take an NVIDIA now things might be getting weak here NNC's never went green as we had stuff pushing up. It's usually not a good sign once they turn green a green and and You know flip from red to green then you may be a little safer going long something like this It's just based off price action and not any volume and that is staying strong. Well We get out of another Airbnb here Little to $1.60 a dollar 60 to close quarter So nice flip there and Airbnb It's been a while since I've taken a downside volume runner That's news coming out Netflix just kind of hanging on same thing with Tesla meta is already going through highs So that's interesting Airbnb Kind of trying to pop back up here Okay, thanks up for Amazon's kind of holding on to just consolidating here. So Well, that's good or bad Roku kind of had a little mighty 90 there You see what that looks like and toss Yeah, pretty decent mighty 90 if I could have gotten filled down here. We'll see if it pushes back down It's a pretty decent looking mighty 90 and toss to But it needs to come down back through to Lowe's Okay, there goes. So Roku Gonna trade the 92 calls 92 calls in Roku. Ah Man pop back up. What are you doing? Come back down here. Yeah, it didn't come it didn't stay down long I'm not gonna chase it or be me trying to pop back up to Don't like that Roku I was trying to get filled like a buck 65 right in there Amazon pushing up cancel my Roku Yeah, it didn't come down very Long, I mean it came down touched and went right back up So sounds like some positive news appreciate you posting that Yeah, I'm still in Airbnb It's popping back up Nvidia Struggled when push up with some of these others not convinced we're not still going a little lower Not many good signals here today Yeah, but Netflix pushing down here. See how far goes Apples Apple and Amazon or what I would say really good consolidators right there So seems like oh Man, look at that S&P popped up now coming back down It's interesting Roku coming down. I still got everything on that. I don't I don't have the order in but watching the price 92 calls in Roku for that mighty 90 Yeah, look at meta try to jump in Roku here Builded a buck 70 in Roku. So I'll look for two volume bars that are green Consecutive Airbnb It gets above here be my cut point Square and I was real tempted to jump in square upside continuation Close half my Roku at a buck 90. So I guess technically I've our turn green for Roku didn't it's build a buck 90 B&B so roll back over for me Dang it. Dang it. Dang it should have went with my gut If markets were strong, I was gonna get in square, but they were weak. So I It really didn't come down to that pivot like I wanted it to either Get out of another Roku at 205 so Airbnb kind of popping up to where My exit would be so I'm gonna cut Airbnb Builded a buck 22. So gave a little back there meta mighty 90 Yeah, it kind of does have a little separation but Man, it's strong. So Gonna be careful with that one. I don't want to get myself in a one. That's and rip your face off mode Man futures have really pushed up Netflix Take a look at Netflix and Toss Yeah, it's not just even in toss like that separation You just got to make sure that there it can't just be barely bigger. It's got to be there has to be some separation If you go back and watch my video from yesterday, you'll see Nvidia you'll see the big difference Like I don't really trade the mighty 90s when they're just just barely separation I really only traded when I when I get that Real distinct separation a lot of times people will see oh, it's it's bigger than the previous Well, yeah, but like a couple ticks But that's not that's not The point of the mighty 90 the point of the mighty 90 is When you've got a clear volume pop that makes it separate from the previous one Hey, so Roku Gonna decide do I cut it I mean this one was red and That the last second flipped to green So I might I might wait just to wait and see what this next bar gives me so these stocks really aren't going anywhere Apple Amazon they're just gonna sit in there. Let's go mighty 90. Let me check that in Yeah, the mighty 90 in Costco, I would say that qualifies. That's good enough separation. See what those Prices are like kind of wide strikes. I guess they're not awful. Well 30 cents 40 cents. Yeah, so do not make a kind of stay away from Costco But if you like it take it right ah Roku coming back down and see that until now Let me guess Airbnb rolled over I don't know yet Yeah, I'm not always right though But is it a good example of how there's better Separation, I mean just as an example if you're kind of learning the mighty 90 It's definitely better than some of the others that you we've seen today So Roku technically should be out of it I got in down here at the bottom of this bar and then it popped up green So I wasn't really gonna count that one is green the thing with meta though, man That bar too was close to as big as the first Wouldn't be surprised to see a little consolidation here and then rip and if Roku looks like it wants to really come down I'll probably just bail on it since technically I've gotten two green bars Airbnb Kind of turn and roll over here. Maybe I should have Hell is a little bit longer Which is doing that future is pushing up towards highs of day Let me go ahead and close my Roku. Looks like it wants to come down here Build it a buck 80 so as a winner a monster winner by any means but got out of half and then Got out 10 cents higher than I got my original fill The Nvidia how it held and now it's popping up. I Was really cloning I was talking about getting long if it came down to yesterday's high You see how it Three times it dipped its toe below it and then pushed up. Yeah apples kind of consolidating here Dang it in video I've been a beast Costco's still coming down. Hey pal kind of consolidating as well Now let's see if it comes down. I Airbnb roll back over look at that Shucks did he am I 90s take peak on toss? Yeah, I'd say with toss or some distinct separation. So if it pushes Back up to where it got pushed down here. I might look to get short Amazon pushing through highs of day I wouldn't want to get in right here because they could push up against me We wanted to push back up Meanwhile the S&P and the Nasdaq have gone positive So square I talked about getting long did not do it Talked about getting long and video here did not do it Apple you could get long Apple here. I'm not going to but just because the range is so tight definitely Could go higher there There Costco finally bum pushed up PayPal I was also looking if it came back down to yesterday's high. I was gonna get long for Upside continuation looks like it pushed through that and Apple's still coming down a little bit Yeah, it's like NVIDIA. You know NVIDIA could give us one red bar then rip through highs too Because it kind of was setting up as a continuation to the upside So not not the best signals today Don't like to trade in hindsight, but in hindsight Getting in square and NVIDIA on continuation runners would have probably led to green trades Was a good out in Roku Sure got out a little sooner So Roku might have a mighty 90 long here see that Maybe giving us another mighty 90 Check toss here. Yeah, definitely another mighty 90 here. So Roku I would trade the 91 Calls build at 216. So another mighty 90 entry for Roku. I would close half at 235 little blocks going through highs of day PayPal got forced back down. It's interesting. My only concern with Roku is that it's one of the weaker stocks on the board today So it rolls over Could be I don't want to roll over. I want it to try to rebound here Sometimes like downside continuation you get this push down pop up push down pop up push down and so Don't want that to happen with Roku Meadow looks like it wants to get through highs of day Amazon not much green in Amazon. I'm sorry not much red. I mean and I don't I don't know I can't remember last time I took two mighty 90 longs with the same stock. It's such a quick turnaround It's a bold strategy cotton. We'll see if it pays off Future's trying to start to chop here a little bit now So Nvidia looks like it's working on its second red bar if you could have got in right at the top there Apple trying to push up see if it gets through those that consolidation or not a lot of chops starting to happen build at 235 In Roku well done Roku To hit my half, but if I get to mighty 90 winners Out of that tight range. I'm gonna laugh. Oh darn it That's right. It happens. I've done that many a times done that many of times NASDAQ Future's pushing up. I'll see I'll get out of another Roku at 255 Goog Thriving higher. Okay, so I want Roku just to bust through this Can I see where that? Green bar is where I got forced back down and if it can get through there That might run a little bit Tesla kind of consolidating underneath that pivot watching Roku. It's just like can I get through there or not every time it tries it? It's gotten busted down pushed down and as that's coming right up to a pivot. Well, not a lot of action today, but Got a couple Two green two winners and potentially a third winner here. So I guess I can't complain about that Ideally Roku could finish with a red bar here and then give me two consecutive greens after that Hey filled at 255 To close a quarter of Roku Yeah, Netflix has a little mighty 90 there. It's already come down though See Microsoft hasn't been able to bust through highs of day neither is Apple so you know Roku can't get through this and I probably would cut it. Yeah, for sure It's also got a gradual Descendant to I don't know if you can see that and so I don't necessarily like getting long when you see that so Amazon kind of more little consolidation kind of Trending upward a little bit and it finally busted out Meta consolidating Tesla kind of consolidating so it looks like looks like Roku is gonna give me my second green bar, so Probably we'll get out of it because it still Hasn't pushed through this consolidation area. I'm worried it's gonna See my videos come back down. I'm worried. It's just gonna roll back over So you gonna give it just a few seconds. See I give it like maybe this first minute here See Larry bumblebee Back tomorrow So I'm just giving Roku a minute here to see if they can bust through this my worry is it's gonna get forced back down here But I'm gonna give it a chance come back down futures really popping up here Nasdaq futures just just ripping up. Okay, so it looks like Roku is going to burst through here So I would get out of another Roku at 275 So just kind of taking this mighty 90 and letting it run now a little bit as things are getting strong I'm gonna try to close it out here Trying to hit the peak of this push on this one and then I'll close it out And I close it here for it retreats filled at 268 Close that mighty 90 So that it run just a little bit there. All right folks not in anything else so Not as much action today, but I'll take it and I will see everybody back here tomorrow So have great rest your day. Peace


Welcome back to Kids Fun Science. My name is Ken. Today's experiment is electromagnetic train. As always, adult supervision is required. What you need for this experiment is copper wire, 18 gauge, a triple-A battery, six magnets, five eighth inch pipe, and a wire cutters. To start off this experiment I'm using an 18 gauge 25 foot copper wire with a five eighth inch electrical pipe. I drilled a hole in the pipe so I could stick the wire in which it'll hold the wire at one end. And then what you're gonna do is continue to wrap the wire around the electrical pipe as tight as you can. You can see there's some gaps right there but every once in a while I will pull up and get it flush because we want it as tight as we can with the copper wire. I wish I would have bought a hundred foot copper wire because then I could have made a circle and then my train could have went in a circle completely and I'm only gonna have a straight path for this for this experiment. But definitely if you guys go out and do this make sure you go out and get a longer copper wire and then also maybe even have a electric drill or something hooked to the pipe so it can spin it so you can get done a lot quicker even though it didn't take that long to put the copper wire on. And then the electrical pipe I just got at the hardware store same with the copper wire. So here I'm checking back I pulled it up tight you can see it's really tight here and about three-quarters of the way done and I'll check back in just a little bit. Here I'm back again I'm just about to finish up here on the the wire and then I want to show you how to get it off you want to keep it as tight as possible when pulling it off because if it gets too loose the experiment is not gonna work and so we're almost there once I get to the end of this then I'll be able to you're gonna use some wire cutters because remember the other end I woven a piece of copper at the in the pipe to be able to hold it on so it wouldn't slide off and I'm gonna cut that and then slide it off and then we'll be able to do the experiment. Alright so I'm at the end of the put the wire copper wire on to the pipe and now I need to take my wire cutters and cut the end where I drill the hole in and slid the copper and take the piece out and now it's free to slide off the end because it's not hooked into that hole right there and once I get it out then I'm able to do the experiment. I'm gonna use a triple-a battery and put the three neo magnets on each end so you put once you have your magnets on each end of the battery it just slides around right on through and goes all the way down the tracks which is pretty impressive so one thing to set it up is you need to make sure that the magnets are placed on the battery correctly so the poles are facing opposite directions so if it doesn't work make sure you switch the batteries around and then you're able to get it to work. So how does the train work? Well electricity and magnets are linked in a way that scientists don't completely understand. Each can create the other so when we wrap the copper wire into the coils and run the electric current through it it will create a magnetic field which I've done in another experiment which I'll put in the description so you can actually see how to make a magnetic field. If you rotate the permanent magnet in the opposite to the item that has been magnetized inside the coil of the copper wire you create a electrical current but in this project the magnets at the end of the battery create a bar magnet with the north and south pole remember you have to have the opposite ends otherwise it wouldn't work. When you put the train inside the coils it causes the electrical current to flow around the copper wire which creates a magnetic field in a section of the wire coils right around the train. This magnetic field has its own north and south poles which pushes the train along the track. You'll notice the train will only run in one direction so go ahead and give it a try and go the other way and it's not going to work because of the magnetic poles. It's pretty amazing science. I hope you enjoyed this video remember to click thumbs up and to subscribe as we do a new video every day. Thanks for watching!


The number of Russian soldiers who refuse to fight is increasing. A military court in Russia's Kamchatka has sentenced two servicemen who refused to go to war in Ukraine to 2.6 years in a general security prison. Siberia.reli.news.outlet reported it. Military officer Alexander Stepanov refused to go to Ukraine on the 18th of January 2023, while staying at the headquarters of one of the military units in Kamchatka. On the 21st of January, another serviceman Andrey Mikhailov refused to comply with a similar order from the commander while in a club of a military unit in the city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. They were found guilty of disobeying the command's order during mobilization. From September 2022 to the end of April 2023, Russian military courts received 1,064 criminal cases against servicemen who voluntarily left their place of service, refused to obey an order or deserted. In September 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law on amendments to the criminal code which increased prison terms for desertion, per se, and desertion during hostilities and mobilization. The first criminal case with these amendments considered was initiated in Murmansk in December 2022.