Okay, welcome back guys. Hope you had a good break, a long one. Okay, let's just continue from where we left off and you're not. So we are learning about, you know, from God's Word about healing and ministering, divine healing and deliverance. So what we'll begin to learn in this session is basis for ministering, healing and deliverance. Basis means what are the fundamental basics that we need to remember or we need to know when we are ministering and healing and deliverance. Okay. One of the first things is that we need to, again, we are reiterating this point that it is God's nature to heal us. Right. It is in his heart. It is his intention. It is his desire to see his children live a whole life. Right. And otherwise, he wouldn't have a covenant name called Jehovah Rafa, which means he's our healer. Right. So we learned very clearly that everything he does, his word and his will will be consistent with his nature. Okay. So God, who is known as our healer, will not suddenly become who, you know, who want to send sicknesses to us as well. Okay. That is not consistent with who he is. Are you with me? Right. So our view of sickness, disease and, you know, demonic oppression must come from the understanding that our God is our healer and he is our deliverer. Okay. Are you with me? All right. The second basis for healing and deliverance is the cross. What happened? Okay. The second basis for ministering, healing and deliverance is the cross. Okay. Isaiah in chapter 53, let's go to Isaiah chapter 53. Isaiah lived approximately, and he's saying this approximately 760 years before Jesus was born. Okay. About 760 years before Jesus, the prophet Isaiah, he writes this in Isaiah 53 verse four and five. So remember, this is the second basis, the second point for basis for ministering, healing and deliverance, which is the cross. Okay. Let me read it for us. Isaiah 53 was four and five. It says, surely he has born our griefs and carried our sorrows. Okay. Why don't you just underline that if you can, if you have an actual Bible. Okay. I want you, the reason is to look at the choice of words there. Okay. Surely he has born our griefs and carried our sorrows. Okay. Yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God and afflicted, but he was wounded for our transgressions. He was bruised for our iniquities. The chastisement of our peace was upon him and by his stripes we are healed. Okay. So the Hebrew word grief, one of the reasons I asked you to underline grief is the word, the Hebrew words as mentioned there is sickness and disease. Okay. The Hebrew word that's used for grief is translated into sickness and disease. That's why when Matthew, he quotes the same verse in Matthew chapter 8 verse 17, in Matthew chapter 8 verse 17, it says then that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by prophet Isaiah saying he himself took our infirmities and bore our sickness. Okay. Now look at what Isaiah writes. He says he took our griefs and our sorrows. Matthew was quoting the same scripture, but he's using different choice of words there. Right. He himself took our infirmities and bore our sicknesses. Okay. Another word that was one of the words that says the chastisement of our peace was upon him. We all know the Hebrew word for peace is shalom. Okay. It's not just, you know, peace doesn't mean just calm. It means everything about your whole well-being and that's what it means. Okay.  First Peter chapter 2 verse 24 once again quotes that who himself bore our sins in his own body on the tree. Guys, remember we are talking about the cross. Okay. The power of the cross and one of the basis for ministering healing and deliverance. Okay. When you pray for people. Okay. You're not just praying without knowing, understanding what you're praying about. Okay. You realize and you know your identity, the authority that God has given you and then what he has accomplished on the cross. Amen. Right. So first Peter chapter 2 verse 24 it says who himself bore our sins in his own body on the tree that we having died to sins might live for righteousness by whose stripes you were healed. Okay. So on the cross so many things happened and one of those was that he took our sins, our diseases, our sicknesses, our pain, our shame, our sorrows, our griefs. Are you with me? Right. Let's read some more scriptures. Colossians chapter 2 was 14 and 15. Colossians chapter 2 was 14 and 15. It says having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us which was contrary to us and he has taken it out of the way having nailed it to the cross, having disarmed principalities and powers and he made a public spectacle of them triumphing over them in it. I love that verse 15. Okay. He has taken it out of the way. Okay. The law said you are guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty. The verdict is death. Right. You and I were supposed to walk down that you know that the road, Golgotha, Calvary, take the cross, lie on the cross because that's what we should be getting. But Jesus did it on our behalf. He took our cross. But this verse 15 it says where is that? He just didn't take our sins on the cross. Verse 15 says he disarmed the principalities and the powers of darkness. He disarmed. What does that mean disarmed? Armed means what? Hands, weapons. So for example, I mean this is a language that's used by say police or military armed forces. They kill, they call it right. If you're armed, that means you're carrying a gun or a weapon, a knife, whatever. That means this person is armed because he's carrying a weapon. Disarmed means that means the weapons have been taken away from you or your powers. And here the scripture is saying Jesus disarmed. That means he stripped every authority that the devil had. He disarmed the powers and the principalities. He just didn't do that. He made a public spectacle. He made a public scene. It's like, hey, look at this. Everybody is saying, everybody knows that the Satan is defeated. So beautiful the way and powerful the way the scriptures mention it. He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it. How did this happen? Because of the cross. You're with me guys, right? And Hebrews chapter two verse 14. Hebrews chapter two verse 14. Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, he himself likewise shared in the same that through death he might destroy him who had the power of death that is the devil. I'll read that one more time. Hebrews chapter two verse 14. Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, he himself likewise shared in the same that through death he might destroy him who had the power of death that is the devil. One more scripture for us in Isaiah chapter 53 verse 12. Isaiah 53 verse 12. Therefore I will divide him a portion with the great and he shall divide the spoil with the strong. He will divide the spoil with the strong. So what that means is he will share his victory with us, his church. So let's pause here for a quick second. We minister healing and deliverance. We operate and we do everything based on the finished work of the cross. Are you with me? Right? And that is quite powerful knowing and we just when we realize that as what Colossians says in chapter two verse 15, knowing that this enemy has no power over us, right? One of the most embarrassing parts of some of the Christians is that we keep losing to an enemy that is already being defeated. Okay, nobody understood that. Okay, but it is very embarrassing, isn't it? Losing to someone who's already lost the battle. How do we manage to do that? Jesus has already won the battle for us. He's given us the blank check, right? The cross is it. He's won the victory. We need to live life in that authority that Jesus has paid the price on the cross. We need to have a revelation of that wonderful, wonderful cross on which Jesus died. And the other part and the other aspect of the cross is the blood of Jesus. Everybody say the blood of Jesus. Okay, Colossians chapter one verse 13 and 14. Colossians one verse 13 and 14 it says, He has delivered us from the power of darkness and conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love. In whom we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins. Everybody say through His blood. Okay, so in whom we have redemption through His blood. Amen. Hebrews chapter nine verse 12. Hebrews nine verse 12. Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood, He entered the most holy place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption. But with His own blood, He entered the most holy place once and for all, not with the blood of goats and calves. Why is that mentioned there? Why is the Hebrews writer mentioning that with the blood of goats and calves? Because in the Old Covenant, in the Old Testament, in the Tabernacle, they would enter with the blood of the goats and calves. Are you with me? Yes. And it was that blood that was poured on the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant. And so when John the Baptist sees Jesus for the first time, not for the first time, I'm sure he's seen him before that, but the Bible tells us for the first time, he says, Okay, behold the Lamb of God who it's very important, who takes away. Okay, that means it's not just a covering. So in the Old Testament, in the Old Covenant, the blood which was poured on the mercy seat was just a covering for the sins. What Jesus paid with His own blood is He took away. That means there's nothing more to cover or hide. Are you with me guys? Okay, so the blood is powerful because it was His blood of the sinless Lamb of God that was presented in heaven that made a way for us to enter. Are you with me? Yeah, okay. Let's just move on to another section. Basis of ministering, healing and deliverance, which is the word in your notes, which the page number would be 47. Okay, 47. Okay. Okay, thank you. So in your PDF, it's page 47. So the page numbers are different in this book. Okay, so what was the second basis for ministering, healing and deliverance was the cross. Yeah, in the cross, we learned about the cross, the power of His cross and the blood. And now we're looking at the third point, which is the word. Okay, everybody say the word. Okay.  Right? So an important truth we need to embrace with all our hearts is the power of God's word. God creates through His word. God carries out His work through His word. Okay, one, God creates through His word. He spoke and the worlds were created. Right? Said, let there be and there was. Okay, so there's power in His word. Let's look at Psalm 33 verse 6 and 9. Psalm 33 verse 6 and 9 says, by the word of the Lord, the heavens were made and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth. Verse 9, for He spoke and it was done. He commanded and it stood fast. Okay, for He spoke and it was done, He commanded and it stood fast. Hebrews chapter 11 verse 3. Hebrews 11 verse 3 says, by faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God. By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible. Okay. So the power of God is resilient in His word. Right? His word in Hebrews chapter 4 verse 12, it states like for the word of God is living and powerful. So we looked at three scriptures. What's the first scripture? Psalm 33. What does it say? By the word of the Lord, the heavens were made. Okay, it's not even words guys. It's like it's not even plural. It's a singular. By the word of the Lord, the heavens were made. Right? And the starry host by the breath of His mouth. Verse 9, for He spoke. Everybody say spoke. Say one more time. For He spoke and it was done. He commanded and it stood fast. Right? I don't know who said this but it says I can explain gravity. I can explain that gravity causes the planets to go in motion but I cannot say who set them in motion. I forget who quoted that. But in this word he says it was done. He commanded and it stood fast. Imagine guys, I mean Isaiah chapter 39 or 40, it says He holds the entire universe in the span of His hands. Like somewhere, okay, the whole universe is Isaiah writes that He holds the entire universe in the span of His hands and we are still discovering. Okay, there's this galaxy, there's that galaxy. The farthest we've gone, I think, is 33 million light years. I forget the whirlpool galaxy is the farthest that the mankind has discovered and that's not even the end. Are you with me? Right? Does anybody know the speed of light? Those online are googling it. Speed of light. No, you're missed your science class. 300,000 kilometers per second per second. 300,000 kilometers per second. So a beam of light can circle the globe, our planet, seven times in one second. Okay? A beam of light can circle the earth seven times in a second. It takes only eight minutes for the light from the sun to reach earth. Oh, eight minutes is such a long time. You wouldn't say that if you knew the distance between the sun and earth. To say the least, it's very far. It's like going from here to electronic city, no. It only takes eight minutes. I mean, just think about it. And then here's this God, said, let there be light. Can you imagine the explosion that would have happened when he said that? So I hear a lot of people, I wish I was there when God created the universe. I was like, no, not really. I don't think you wanted to be there when he created the universe. It would have been quite a big bang. What an event that would have been. And then the psalmist writes, by the word of the Lord, the heavens were made. He spoke and there was. He commanded and they stood fast. Amen. It's his word. I mean, the psalmist is so beautiful in the scriptures. Time and time again talks about the power in his word and how the clouds obey him and how the oceans will not cross the boundaries that he's marked. God's like, okay, you will not go beyond this. Ocean's like, okay. Can you imagine? So there is power in his word to say the least, guys. Are you with me? Right? Just to reiterate another scripture, which we just read, Hebrews 11, 3 is by faith, we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible, but it was by his word. And again, in Hebrews chapter four verse 12, he beautifully writes, for the word of God is living. Everybody say living. What does that mean? It's alive. It's alive. It's not just another book or pages or no. The word of God is alive. Why? Because he is alive. And why? Because he is the word. Are you with me? Right? And so his word carries healing power. God's word carries God's healing power. Psalm 107 verse 20. Psalm 107 verse 20. He sent his word and he healed them and delivered them from their destruction. He sent his word and healed them. His word is healing to our bodies. Proverbs chapter four, let's go to Proverbs chapter four. If you have your Bible, you can turn to it. Proverbs chapter four was 20 and 22. 20 to 22. Thank you. So my son, give attention to my words. Incline your year to my sayings. Do not let them depart from your eyes. Keep them in the midst of your heart. Okay, pause. So that word starts off 20. He says, my son, give attention to my words. Incline your years. What does it mean?  Say what you're incline your years to my sayings. Don't let them depart from your eyes. Keep them in the midst of your heart. Why? Answer is in verse 22. For they are life to those who find them and health to all their flesh. Okay. So the Hebrew word again for health. Now, why do we keep using this in the Greek in the Hebrew? This is what it means. This is what it says in the Greek and this is what it says in the Hebrew. This is a side point. Okay. I want you all to remember and I've stressed this many times before. There is a difference between reading the Bible and studying the Bible. Right. There's a difference between reading the Bible and studying the Bible. Now, the Bible was written for us. Okay. The Bible was written for us so that we would read and we would be encouraged. We would be edified. We would be empowered. But the Bible was not written to us. You with me? It was written to a different audience in a different time, at a different culture, different setting, different geographical setting, different people who wore different kind of clothes, who thought differently, whose examples were different. Everything was different hundreds of years, thousands and thousands of years ago. Right. So there is a difference between reading the Bible and studying the Bible. While the Bible was written for us, it was not written to us. The audience were very, very different. Okay. So with that in mind, the word health, the Hebrew word for health used there has health, cure, medicine, deliverance and remedy. Health, cure, medicine, deliverance and remedy. Okay. So now with that, let's just say, read that verse for their life to those who find them and health, cure, medicine, deliverance and remedy to all their flesh. Are you with me? Okay. Let's read this scripture. First Thessalonians chapter two was 13. First Thessalonians chapter two was 13.  Right. And then it goes on to say the word became, everybody say the word became flesh. What does that mean? It manifested. Right. It just didn't remain the word like, okay, this is some sci-fi thing, you know, like Alice in Wonderland kind of a thing. No, sorry. The word became flesh. It manifested. Right. That means it came into action. It was done. Something was done.  And the Bible talks about it. Right. Apostle Paul commended the Thessalonian church for their receptivity of the word that was preached to them. So look at the first Thessalonians chapter two was 13. I'll read it for us. Hi Nina. I see your question. How do we explain servants of God falling sick and sometimes succumbing? The same reasons would apply. Yes, Nina. So, but yeah, you're right. The same reasons would apply. And I mean, also just to add on to it, right? We see, even after a person is being healed or delivered from an oppression or from a possession or whatnot, it's, it again comes down to our responsibility to how we continue to walk in faith and guard our hearts.  I can move, I can jump and whatnot. That doesn't mean I can go jump off the building and nothing will happen. You get what I'm saying? So it's, I mean, a lot of things are in, you know, it comes down to our responsibility, how we take care of ourselves. We are not negligent. We are not, you know, we have an enemy who wants to destroy us. I think that is enough. We don't need to be negligent and not take care of ourselves. I hope that helps. Okay. So yeah, first, let's learn in chapter two was 13. It says, for this reason, we also thank God without seizing, because when you receive the word of God, which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe. Okay. Those three words are very important. Effectively works in you. So the word of God, which was preached just didn't remain. Okay. It's like a seed, right? One of the parables that Jesus uses. His words are like seed, isn't it? And it has to go deep, bear fruit, and all of that. So that's what Paul is saying. Okay. It just didn't remain as seeds in your life. Okay. It started working in your life. It became flesh. It is manifesting itself. Right. So the word must be mixed with faith in our hearts as Hebrews chapter four verse two says. Okay. Let's read another scripture. Acts chapter, I know guys, I know it's a lot of scriptures. Okay. But it's okay. It's okay. No. Okay. One or two people. Okay. Acts chapter 14 verse eight to 10 says, and in Lystra, a certain man without strength in his feet was sitting, a cripple from his mother's womb, who had never walked. This man heard Paul speaking. Okay. If you have a pen and if you have an actual Bible, you can underline that this man heard Paul speaking. Paul observing him intently and seeing that he had faith to be healed. Look at this guys. Okay. It's, this is awesome. So Paul is preaching and this man is hearing him preaching. Paul is observing. He's just looking at him. Right. No, he's just looking at him. And just by looking at him, he sees, okay, this guy is carrying, you know, faith like gravity that it's pulling me to him. Are you with me? And that's what he says. So Paul observing him intently and seeing that he had faith to be healed, said with a loud voice, stand up straight on your feet and he leapt and walked. I mean, that's the only conversation that is happening. Right. Where Paul is telling, get up and walk. I mean, at least he doesn't record where it says where the leper asked, heal me if you're willing, if God is willing and all of that. The leper, sorry, the cripple heard Paul preaching and his faith was built. Okay, I believe that I can be healed. And then Paul kind of knew in his spirit and he says, get up and walk. Right. So we do have faith in our hearts to receive our healings guys. Okay. Now, another important point. Does anybody have any questions at this point? Any questions? So God has promised renewed strength and longevity for all of us. That is his promise, his word, again, his desire for us is that we would be healthy and live a long and happy life. Long life. So it is up to us. It's our responsibility to take care of our bodies. So let's look at some of the scriptures that supports that statement. Genesis chapter 6, verse 3. It says, And the Lord said, My spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh, yet his days shall be 120 years. 120 years. Okay. Exodus chapter 23, verse 25 and 26.  And I will take sickness away from the midst of you. No one shall suffer miscarriage or be barren in your land. I will fulfill the number of your days. Deuteronomy chapter 33, verse 25. Your sandals shall be iron and bronze. As your days so shall your strength be. I want to read that one more time. Deuteronomy 33, 25. Your sandals shall be iron and bronze. As your days so shall your strength be. Okay. Are you ready for more scriptures? Okay. Why don't some of you read it now? Psalm 103, verse 5.  Okay. The next Job 33, verse 25. His flesh shall be young like a child's, his, he shall return to the days of his youth. Okay. One last. Let's read Psalm 90, verse 10. Okay. The days of our lives are 70 years. And if by reason of strength, they are 80 years. Okay. So all of these scriptures is just, you know, talking about God's desire for us, like talks about longevity and strength. Okay. So I mean, there was this classic question. We have this weekend school of ministry, right? Which APC does once a month. So one of the questions was, okay, so how many years is God exactly? God wants us to live. You know, but so then then again, we use all of these scripture to, you know, to give them an answer. We started off with Genesis chapter 6, verse 3. Say, okay, back then the air was nice. And all of that, you know, the fruits, the water was not polluted and all of that. And so yeah, okay. 120 years, you know, and now these guys are talking about Psalm 90, verse 10. The days of our lives are 70. Okay. If we take care of, I have really well, you know, 80. And then, you know, my grandmother's still alive 95. So, but the point here is that he wants us to live a long life, right? And then he renews our strength, isn't it? And David makes that beautiful prayer. He says that you strengthen my feet like the feet of a deer. Are you with me? Right. So he gives strength to us. It is his word that carries us. Okay. So, you know, we've spoken about a lot of content today. And I really don't want this class to just be aware. I want to just drop all this content on y'all and, you know, give a lot of download and make sure that I finish this book on time. That's really not the point. But this is practical ministry, guys. Okay. This course is practical ministry. It's God's desire. There are people in the world who are hurting. There are people in the world who who wants healing, who needs healing, not just wants, who need healing. And it's what a privilege it is that you and I have been chosen to minister divine healing. Yeah. Okay. It doesn't matter. All right. Yeah. Okay. Amen. So, just think about some of the things that we learned today. God is not the author of sickness and disease. He is not the source. It was man's disobedience. And then there's an enemy who adds to that list. Right. And because of which we cannot afford to not take care of our bodies as well. Yes. And then while we are ministering divine healing and deliverance, we minister out of the power of the cross, knowing God's nature, his blood, and knowing that his word carries power. Are you with me? Yeah. Okay. Let's just pray very quickly. What I want to do is for all of those online, if you know that there's a person who needs healing, just mention their needs. Just mention their names. Okay. And what they need to be prayed for. If you know anyone, no one that's absolutely fine. And for some weird reason, I think the camera has changed from that one to my laptop camera. I don't know when that happened, how that happened. I'm sorry. Okay. Sorry, guys. Okay. If again, if you know of anybody in your family, your friends who needs healing, whatnot, can we just pray for them by faith right now? Yeah. Let's just stand up to our feet. Because like I said, I just don't want this to be about theory and whatnot. Now that we understand who our God is, who is, sorry? Sorry? Huh? Oh, okay. Okay. If you know of someone in your family, your friends, classmates who needs healing, let's just pray for them. Okay. Father, in the name of Jesus, we come to your presence, we come to the throne of grace by the blood of the Lamb, God. And Lord, we lift up all those who need healing right now. Healing in our bodies, Father, any sicknesses, diseases, Father, those who are being oppressed. Jesus, we know that it is your nature to heal us.  You are our Father. Lord, you carried our sickness. You bore our disease, our grief and our sorrows on the cross, our infirmities you took on your cross, Jesus. Your Word says that by your stripes, we are healed. By your stripes, we are healed. And so, Father, we declare the power, the wonder-working power of Jesus Christ over every single individual that is being prayed for right now. Whoever is praying for any individual right now, Jesus, we believe in faith. We come to you in faith, God, knowing that your heart is filled with compassion, that you still heal today as you did 2000 years ago, because you are our healer. You are the truth, Jesus. So we declare healing. Holy Spirit, we ask you to come and demonstrate the wonder-working power of the cross over every single person who needs healing right now, Jesus. We thank you, Lord.  We look to you and we worship and we adore you, Father. We are grateful that you took our shame, our pain, our guilt, our sorrows on the cross, Jesus. And we also know that there is power in your blood, God. You made a way for us to enter the throne of grace, not with the blood of goats and calves, but with your own blood, Jesus. You made a way for us. And so, we say, thank you, Jesus. And we plead the blood of the lamb over everyone who needs to be healed. I thank you, Jesus. I thank you for what you are doing. I thank you for what you've already done. We give you all the glory, honor, power, and praise. And we thank you in advance. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. Amen. Amen. Amen. Amen. Thank you all for joining me in prayer. Thank you, guys. So we'll stop the session today. Stay care. We'll see you all next week. Okay. Bye.


This one, I think this one's okay, I just, the problem, well actually it's not really a problem, I just think, you know, you got to be using a hard stop, like if your risk is the stuff move, you know, put that hard stop in. I can tell that it wasn't a hard stop because it hit the top of the stuff and then he ended up covering lower, but make sure, like on this one, I think it's really going to be a lot of hard stops because there's a lot of good traders here who we kind of review on weekend mentoring each week, but the problem is, is that they take their hard stop out for one second and then they just get blown out of the water. This thesis I think is okay. It was a, it did stuff, it did kind of go lower, it was a hot chick, you know, I don't believe Alex was shorting this one, Alex said he was going to avoid it because it was a hot chick, so read the watch list, pay attention, and if you are going to short things like this after a stuff move, make sure that your heart stops in. That's all I'm going to say. The good part about this chart is that he didn't go back and he didn't fight and re-attack and keep trying to short all the way up. He just kind of ended up, you know, stopping out and that was it, so that's pretty good, but again, use your hard stop and, you know, you're way better. I'm not sure what that line is underneath. I have no idea what that, oh, that's Joe. Shit.  It's the artist. So yeah, that's all I, that's all I've got to say. Next. Yeah, I agree. I think the only thing I would add is that if you're going to take a shot like this, this is where I talk about, you know, dipping my toe into water, you know, taking a really small tester trade to get that first position on, if it starts to work out and starts to move lower, get below view up, then you can start adding on a little bit more size.   So, but other than that, yeah, I think it's a viable thesis for sure. Claudia, I don't have anything to add. I think it's a nice stop. That said, I would have, I don't trade the first 15 minutes. So that is to avoid this kind of shit, but I know that there's people here that love trading the first, the volatility of the first 15 minutes. Oliver, I don't know if you're going to add anything or Yeah, it's pretty much a good stop. I mean, you tried it and stopped out pretty good to me. Sweet. And next up we have Joe. Yeah, I just, I don't think it's a deaf line setup. I don't know if this was just confusing to them is like what setup they were particularly looking for here. I like the entry. I like the stop loss. I like the potential trade. I just, I don't want there to be confusion later that this is what a deaf line setup looks like. This is not what a deaf line setup looks like. This is one of those what Tosh calls kind of like the death candle.  But this is, this is not what you would classify as a death line. So good stop or good, good entry, good stop, just not the right setup categorization. So I just, just for the recording, don't want anybody to get confused on is this a death line and are we condoning these types of entries like this? This is not what a deaf line chart should look like. 100%. And I think for this one, it's just the stock selection. Like if this was a broken chart, we probably would have faded. But because we're doing so much volume, because it's the, you know, most popular ticker on the day, these ones are going to be a little harder. This one, I mean, the one thing I wanted to say on this one is that, and you can't really see, but whoever Angel is, I don't know if it's a guy or a girl, there are some guys named Angel. You know, started in around six, got up into the seven area, you know, you might want to consider stopping out unless your plan is to risk a dollar. Most people's plan is not to risk a dollar, I will say that. So, you know, you really want to make sure that you're not fighting. I know this, this trade was one that Alex ended up losing on as well. There's nothing wrong with it. Just maybe, you know, if you're in around six and we're up at seven, you know, that's a good time to stop out, right? No hard stop, ship myself before exiting manually. Thanks for pointing that out, Joe. Yeah, right, you need hard stops in. This is the problem. There's so many weekend mentoring charts that are like good entries, but, you know, when they're wrong, they don't have a hard stop in. And I don't understand, like there are like five charts today where it would have been good if they had have just stopped out where they were risking, but instead they keep fighting and fighting and fighting, stock appeared broken. But the thing is, is that we start doing millions of volume, we start getting over VWAP, we start moving, right? And then people, people don't have a plan to stop out.  I mean, that's how professional traders trade, right? You should even be looking where you're going to stop out before you enter, right? And so, this is a situation of just kind of, right? Yeah, right where Joe wrote that, right? You know, six 20, that's a good stop, right? That, you know, that's, that's great.  That's all I have to say on this one. Dick? Yeah, I agree. Not a whole lot to add, just, you know, you really got to be, this is, this is one of those typical adding to a loser kind of the thing, right?  It's, it's really not a, and like Joe's just put in there, right? Bad sign for a short.  And then so this could have been two trade sequences, right? Big picture. You're going to stop that at six 20 and try to get back in again at what, six 80.  I had to walk the way and waited for something really substantial to show me that this thing is, is pretty much done. So kind of big stuff move, which didn't happen until later. But I mean, by 1030, I'm done anyway. And so are a lot of other guys. So I've, that's, that's really, I got to add to this one. Claudio. Oh, you're muted, bro. It's because when I don't unmute myself, Tom will pan on me. Anyway, to me, I don't know why, why they saying that this is a low hanging fruit because once it went, I'm assuming that before, the day before it was really high, but ever since this open at 930, it never went down. So that's the only thing I'm going to add. Oliver. Yeah. Obviously, putting the stop at, I mean, seven line, maybe, maybe even if you did put a stop at that seven line, it would have stopped out at, or at 740s anyway. Yeah. Joe, or yeah, Joe, the, the ads. So I put that rectangle there. That's the first 30 minutes of the day. And when you're trading low hanging fruit, Bow has talked about this and countless webinars that he used to do on the trading fish stuff. The first 30 minutes of the day is the best time to short.


Wolfenstein The New Order is insane in the best possible ways, that won't come out as a surprise to anyone who's played it, it has been 3 years since The New Order came out after all. So why am I doing a review on a game that's come out that long ago? It's my way of excusing the fact that I spent 12 hours shooting Nazis in order to prepare for another 12 hours of shooting Nazis in the face in Wolfenstein The New Colossus which is coming out in October of this year 2017.  A history lesson is in order before I move on to praising and critiquing the myriad of elements that make up The New Order the game that it is. I never got to play Wolfenstein 3D or any of the other 90s releases in the series because you see, I was in no state of playing anything. I didn't even exist until 95. Not a good year for humanity considering. And yet none can deny the pivotal role that its software as Wolfenstein 3D played in putting the FPS genre front and centre in nearly every PC game's mind. Right there alongside Doom. It's such a treat to live in a time that sees the reimagining of these two franchises for an entirely new generation. Generation in terms of technology and in terms of players as well. The New Order is excellent at keeping the stakes high. From the starting sequence that climaxes in what is emotionally an impossible choice between a draft veteran and a promising new recruit to the slaughter of innocents in an insane asylum. The motivations to pile Nazi bodies as high as the sky grows stronger and stronger. Tension is a palpable constant companion. No matter where you in the shoes of William B. G. Blaskowitz go. The lorded scene in The Train to Berlin is the height of just such narrative tension. For angels introduction serves a chilly reminder of the sick conviction of purity and superiority that the Nazi ideology has always put front and centre and at this point in the timeline has turned almost religion-like. The events of this game take place 15 years after the end of the war and things are not going particularly well for the world. You know if by particularly well you mean that the entire world has been controlled and taken over by Nazis.  A certainty that I was of the Aryan master race was repulsive. Torturing our dear for Angel, both physically and emotionally, has become something of a favourite pastime, in fact, and with the way Blaskowitz leaves things off with her in the new order, I am more than looking forward to new and imaginative ways for us to maim and abuse each other come October. But enough about the story. While it is fun and engaging and it embraces unexpected risks, few of us play shooters, for the narrative, or for the narrative alone at least, now there are more important elements than those. Gunplay, enemy and level design, even boss fight. Tentatively that last one, but we'll get to that conversation a little bit later. Let us start off with the gunplay. And it is impressive. One of the greatest strengths of the new order, gunplay is an absolute joy. Whenever you fancy your run of the mill semi-automatic or a sniper rifle, that doubles as a laser gun.  My own playstyle in shooters often includes picking a shotgun and cleaving my way through hordes of enemies until no one is left standing. Or I run out of bullets, whichever comes first. Since I have a bad shot, it's usually the latter.  And they do so at a close distance in tiny, tiny spots and they rip your part of the seams. The beauty of the arsenal you have is that it easily allows great flexibility and it allows you to switch weapons on the go constantly, quickly and efficiently. Wireset pieces call for a quick shift between your sniper rifle and assault rifles, and with enemies constantly drawing closer you might pick the shotguns, which does shrapnel mode, and tear a Nazi limb or two away.  Using weapons as the occasion calls for them is, I think, one of the most important and impressive things that Wolfenstein has achieved, this ability to shift gears whenever the circumstance calls for it. Speaking of shrapnel mode, which I, you might have noticed, mentioned earlier, each gun has a secondary firing mode. That way your machine gun doubles as a grenade launcher. Your sniper rifle into a projectile laser weapon and your actual laser cutter doubles as something that can, by the last couple of levels, easily melt just about every unpleasant enemy in your way. Granted you've got enough energy and so on and so forth. Dual wielding is immensely satisfying and cutting through dozens of Nazis with two laser weapons on a secret facility on the moon manages to hit just about every awesome factor you can imagine. And it does so in a major way as well. From what I gather, dual wielding is not too useful on Uber, that is the highest difficulty setting you can pick, and it is a difficulty that all but demands much greater accuracy and loads of headshots if you want to live that is. If you don't, well whatever. What is invalid criticism however is that dual wielding should have offered this greater accuracy with scoping and all that. You don't get any accuracy penalty when you dual wield, you only get the ability to zoom into the scope taken away, which is a very reasonable trade-off to holding two weapons. I only wish that you could press one button and have both weapons fire, instead of having to press the left mouse button for one weapon and the right mouse button for the other. I suspect it's done to conserve ammo, and that's perfectly reasonable of course. Can't really blame them for that, it's just my own personal little oak. Ammo-wise, I feel that shotgun shells in particular are a bit too rare, not nearly plentiful enough for all my shotgunning needs. But that's alright, it's fine. The secondary mode for shotguns is, as I mentioned, shrapnel shots, and those are perfect for shredding enemies, especially in confined spaces. Need of firing mode is too efficient against armoured enemies though, if you've got access to them I'd advise you to use your laser weapons to pick off any armoured villains that you see instead. It's good that the game offers upgrades in secondary firing modes, because just before they start being introduced I must admit I got slightly, just style a bit, bored with the normal modes as it were. But developer Machine Works seems to have a very fine grasp on all of that, because they introduce what's basically half a dozen new weapons that freshen up the combat halfway through. They don't do it all at once, which gives you plentiful time to experience all kinds of fun-wise-to-murder people. Nazis, Nazis, Nazis aren't people, right? The encounters feel that much richer and more satisfying with your newly minted arsenal, of course, in just in time for the last couple of missions. Now let's turn our attention to the chapters, and there are indeed 16 of them. Most of those are designed around giving the players different avenues of approaching combat, and while using guns to clear the way is certainly the most satisfying way to go about it, there's some limited stealth options for any of you sneaky, sneaky enthusiasts. A slow stalk forward and a cut throat can help reach your objective that much more easily, and can often save you a couple of hundred bullets. The level design is such a pleasant break from the corridor levels familiar to most players of games such as Call of Duty and Battlefield. This isn't some uninspired, tacked-on single-player mode. It is a return to form where root and weapon decisions make all the difference all of the time. Choices. Choices are key. Gens Mati's creative director on the new order, as well as the creative director on the new colossus, is all about making choices, strong decisions that you stick to during the entire making of the game. Take that choice between two characters really early on in the new order. You might remember I mentioned them at the beginning when I was talking about the narrative choices made. It doubles the workload of the whole development team, because making that choice basically created two states in which this game and the next one exist. Is this prioritizing of decisions about features, but take a long time to implement that is the foundation of this dual narrative in a storyline sense, as well as the foundation of what I consider is very good level design and some of the most solid gunplay I've had the pleasure of playing in a long time. Now I've seen enough phrases I think. Let's move on to a portion of the game that I didn't enjoy. Not at all, I'm afraid, the boss battles. Not only did I not have fun with those, I was actively annoyed and I dare say the last mission you kind of, kind of let down on that base alone. Take the both battles that games end. You battle one of the villains of the game, Death Head, in a large mech suit.  He is introduced in a very threatening cruel way which sets him up well, after which the good Nazi doctor disappears for the rest of the game only to show up when, at the very last chapter. Sure we get several flashbacks of the aftermath of that first narrative state-defining choice and those try to create a strong enough antagonism within you, the player. But honestly, I just didn't feel like there were enough, though I dislike Death Head absolutely. Though I feel towards him the antagonism that I feel towards Frau Angel, after several tender scenes with her throughout different sections of the game, not even close. It's just that by the end of the game any of that threat that Death Head's introduction created, it has well evaporated. The boss battle itself has two stages, both of them annoying. The first most own account of Death Head's invulnerable shield, almost non-stop fire rate, and you having to run from one corner of the map to the other, twice in order to blow up the Zeppelin energy sources, the power of the aforementioned invulnerability shield. It's almost like spitting in the face of that great gunplay and movement and level design, because the stage of the battle is a gigantic cubicle, very uninspired, absolutely very much so. Now then, the second stage of the battle is best described as bullet spongy. Once the shield is dropped, Death Head's mech goes down a tunnel. Eurus Blaskowitz gives chase and we proceed to shoot each other for 5 to 10 to 15 minutes while Volves starts spraying fire and making the entire arena very difficult to operate around. It makes for an interesting battleground at least, despite the fight itself being, again, boring, frustrating in its nature. You can run out of bullets at one point and have to sprint through the level, hopping to get to one of the several batteries and recharge your energy, weapons before Death Head gets in position from where he can make french cheese out of you. He does drop armor every once in a while so you can use that to tell that you are doing something, some sort of damage, minor damage, major damage, who knows. I only wish that he changed his pattern of attacks, gave some indication this something different showing my progress. If he did I imagine the battle would have been a better ending, a less tedious one, a more interesting fight. Certainly, as it was it gave the new order a somewhat dull anticlimactic ending only partially redeemed by the last cinematic. Before I wrap this up, a few words on the collectibles. There's some really good fluff in the form of newspaper cutouts and tapes, as well as loads of achievement-bate collectibles rolled over the different chapters of the game. Going out of your way to collect them all helps you realise just how much work has been put in the design of some of those levels, in particular. My favourite tidbits of information have to be the newspaper cutouts, which give a lot of back story, a lot of information on the state of the world on how basically all big player countries fell under the Nazi ilk. And on what happened during these 14 years that Blaskowitz spent into a coma? There's information on Britain, on Germany, Japan, the United States and more. Short descriptions that give a look at how the German war machine managed to crush all the resistance. Oh and there's one particular piece about the failing popularity of unhealthy fish and chips on the British Isles and the rising popularity of, you guessed it, German cuisine, bursts and all that, yum. In summary, Wolfenstein, the new order, or Wolfenstein if you'd rather, did far more right than it did wrong and that shows very, very well. I had loads of fun with all these elements I praised repeatedly, the gunplay exploring the chapters and the story touched me on a deeper level than I expected. The excellent marriage of mechanics and narrative strengthens both in several cases and creates a game that's truly a thrill to play. What score would I give it? Well, I've never much liked the idea of scoring games, but if I had to, I suppose I would go with 78 out of 83 Nazi bears. I'd love to give the new order another 5 of those, but they are sadly out of my reach due to an impregnable energy field powered by Led Zeppelin music, which makes the task somewhat more difficult. Thank you for watching and if you enjoyed this, please subscribe and leave a like. If you disagree with me on any of the points I brought up, let me know. Let's get a conversation going, exchange ideas, points of view. That seems to happen less and less lately, but it's a great way to building something constructive, informative and useful. I'll see you next time. Bye! And that's a cut. Good job everyone.  Oh my.


This is the Q&A session to last week's show about our proletarian people, Tower Primitiva Tower. And we're gonna have the creators of Primitiva 3 here, as well as the reviewers. We're blessed and honored to have the most creative minds on the islands and who have contributed to the islands here with us. I wanna now have the team. This is an excellent chance for you team members to bounce questions off the panelists because that's that unique moment here that you have. So in regards of some of the comments you got, please reflect that back. George, you're nodding in the right direction. Maybe you wanna go ahead and direct the question to one of the reviewers. I wanted to just comment to Jay that I wasn't waving because to stop I was waving because he was hitting something that's very close to the deer to my heart as being vegan. So that's what he was mentioning. And also a few things he mentioned. We've been talking about Martin this whole semester about Woodstock and Janice Chaplin. And I talked about Stony Wood when she was two feet away from me. So I'm from the New York area. So I mentioned my brother having almost died at Woodstock when he was sleeping. And then the whole thing that we talked about many times about young people making love without being oblivious to the people around them, you know, there at Woodstock. And that was the way things were back then. When I, 1968, you know, I was in Europe but my brother was at Woodstock. I was at Sorbonne that summer. And that summer, Sorbonne was taken over by some young people. So I had to go to school at Lise Louie Legrand which was across the street. So those were really different times. There was freedom and rebellion. And I remember all that, you know? So it's a different era when we were free.  And then the 60s was just wild times, freedom. And then when Reagan came in, he sort of went back to conservatism in so many ways. So I mean, he was hitting a lot of the points that were close to my armor.  And you know, Martin, we've talked about this many times about the freedom and, you know, and basically how we're socialized, capitalism, what was his name? My professor, Reg Kwak used to talk about how soap, you know, the planning department, that the suds are only for commercial purposes. It's the rubbing that cleans you, not the foam, you know? So it's just, we are totally socialized to believe things. Like when Martin had mentioned about washing in the ocean, how healthy washing in the ocean is, and it gets back to the whole nature. So I'll leave it at that, but, so I just wanted to make Jay think I was telling him to stop, so. Thank you, George. Well, George, my brother was at Woodstock. He had a VW wagon and he said it was all muddy. So it wasn't as idealistic as it was. But the more important thing I want to make sure all the students here is that they're experimenting how we're gonna adapt to a climate change world. And so providing a new way to try out different lifestyle, different architecture is really the key idea I think that's underlying this, is whether you adapt to this particular lifestyle, is that you're creating more opportunities and see how it fits in the new environments. And we're gonna have different environments in the future whether Hawaii is hotter, colder, and so forth. So this is really, like I said, planting different seeds in different locations and see how it works and learning as a culture, how do we adapt? And so I think that's the really, really important thing whether we stylistically, culturally, and how we think about things is that learning, beginning to adapt. Martin, may I add something to this? You know, we are in a time when climate change is not in the future and adaptation to climate change is not in the future. It's right now. And so all these ideas, these creative points, these solutions that your team has come up with, we should take them seriously and we should pick the ones that will work and start insinuating them into the daily development of the city and the state. It doesn't have to be all these things all of the same time. As I was saying, there might be obstacles to that, but some of them would actually work. Some of them are now. And so, you know, a really workable project that some client would, you know, take off with it could be built right now and it couldn't incorporate some of the ideas we've heard today. I don't know about the engineering. I think that, I don't know if architecture always includes engineering, but query whether that thing will stand up, query whether the wind will blow it away or not, you know, all those engineering questions and whether, you know, you could have a workable social arrangement by sitting on the pot. You know, in some places in the world, that's what they do, but there are social issues around that here. In any event, there are a lot of ideas there that could be incorporated right now. And this is not something 10 years away or 20, it's something right now. No, thank you, Jane. Echoing that this is a tradition, this is an evolution of primitivas that, you know, Socrates has been part of, as he said, from ever since. So we all remember primitiva one, it was still rather behaved and rather sort of insecure.  And so we've been bugging him and bothering him and saying, isn't this what you guys would need, right?  Yeah, you guys are a little weird and you're young and I was like that and all of that and more, he kind of said, right? But we said, please listen to us one last time. And he did. And he kind of interrupted us and himself every now and then he said, well, just like what you were saying, well, this aspect is actually could really be, you know, seen as favorable from these people and this other aspect from that and at the end of the whole hour having to listen, he basically turned around 180 degrees from basically saying no to begin with. After that, he basically said something very similar. He worded it a little differently, but the message was the same as UJ said. He said, okay, I have no doubt that this will be the future. The question I have to ask myself and my peers is, are we ready for the future yet? And we're obviously sending this message back to Bob and everyone else. Yes, you should be ready here and now, right? And that's why we brought in the team, not speaking on behalf of Larry Medlin, who was at the young age of 80, moving in Arizona out of his house into a new one. That's the way you can't be with us, but he was with us. And he is, he's been sitting in this little Berlin Bauhausian box that we showed at the beginning of the presentation. And Friado had been traveling for the United States and giving lectures and extended this invitation for young people to stop by and he took him up on that offer. And the rest is history. They've been sitting in this little box when a government person was walking by and was so intrigued by the little soap bubble, little things, just like we've been doing that they invited them for the most important project that you can think of, of a young upcoming architect, which was the pavilion of the country of Germany on the World Fair in 67. And they made this, they made this happen. And so from a structural engineering point of view, Larry confirms us from this background, this works. This works. And we made sure we don't develop the weird one, the weird version. We developed the one that's actually the most feasible. And one other note, going back to you, Thomas, one thing of the many things you taught me was the differentiation between invasive and exotic and coming from your plant world, you explain, we all know what invasive is. It's something from somewhere else. It takes over, it suppresses the local stuff. Exotic doesn't do that. Exotic comes from somewhere else too, but it complements the environment. For example, the palm tree is exotic to some degree because no other species grows in sand as they do, right? And in many ways, primitivas are organisms, natural organisms, and they basically thrive and then they develop obviously differently at different subclimates and sublocations. So totally right, Jay, I've been thinking about an even primitiva one was thinking out there, Oahu West, right, with my employer, UH, and that you all pay for it with your two highest tuition and fees, thank you guys for that, right? They got to do something out there. And there's also a large population of local people. We got DHHL. So why don't you make a collaborative project of UH West and DHL and rather than sprawling it and basically making it couple-age and ruin the land to consolidate on that small footprint. And around it, you keep the country, country, these things, right, Thomas? Martin, I also wanna make sure your student, what I got out of it was a part of why would I want to live on the top part of your building? And so that's the part I think you wanna emphasize narratively, the aspirational part. If you wanna live, why do you wanna go all the way to the top because you want to see the top of the world? You want to feel like you're conquering the world. So part of the aspiration of the sociology and the cultural aspect, you live there because part of you spending all the time sprawling all the way up is that you wanna spend time up there. So you have to talk about part of the inspirational part of those people wanna live there. Why do you wanna be on the top? Because they're always wondering why would you spend all the time walk every day going back up? It's because sitting on top from that view and what you see below you that you were part of something of a large holistic thing, that's the reward. So you have to talk about reward of sitting where you are on top and whatever. You have to explain the sociology within that structure because that will make it warm, realistically into the human component that you have to explain too. So I think that will be really important to make it somewhat successful and also allow us to think about how do we adapt? Thank you, Thomas Bundes. If you're still there, you have a, I wanna lobby you and Kalin's exhibition that you guys have going up about the legendary Alfred Yee because Jay was talking about the engineering part. You wanna maybe chip in a little bit of El's thoughts. And he by the way has been a consultant of Primitivo one. I had the chance to meet him once shortly before he passed away. And it was an unforgettable moment when he was basically looking at the structure and he said, this is a no brainer, we figure this out. But I wanna talk about that this building is alive and it lives and it's an organism. And it was referring to what Hugh George were recalling Quinn Emma Gardens, which he initiated like that initially before it fell back on the open market. And now it's obviously gentrified as everything else. But El said, we had a millionaire living there as the trash guy, the trash operating guy. Both of them were basically had equal rights and that's kind of important. So maybe Bunda, do you wanna chip in from an El point of view? I think he would like to just help you solve the problems. It does consolidate some idea that he had in particular something that involved water, his collaboration with Hans Kroek and also his barges that after he passed away, nobody is dealing with water at all in terms of like engineering and structural design. And with the high rise, he always pushed the limit. He can come up with way that can channel all those water and also be cast everything and can be erected in no time. Kers and Poets, Alamona building, he did that in nine months, total construction. But these, if it's an invasive species, we have to do it fast. And I think he would help you to come up with a system that can populate it throughout, not only in the urban context, but the area that needed it. For example, like Jay was mentioning about the cars. So we can really parasite it in a parking garage that doesn't get used, things like that, but we can cantilever it out and populate all this idea throughout the city. And instead of going out into Aver Beach and just build more there, we still keep the country country, but keep the urban urban and bring the country in the urban. So that's how I see it. I wanna bring in one last person that can't be physically with us, but speaking on behalf of him. And this gets us to not just the discipline of architecture, but the professional architecture that this one would basically be a very provocative finger. And you can imagine which finger, maybe in the face of the profession, right? Who's not doing anything anywhere close to what we're in. Maybe they would see it as a competition, as a threat. But again, there's always exceptions to rules. And I'm thinking about a gentleman who used to be the AIA chapter on the little president so many years ago. And you were sitting down with him Jay and did a show. And there was in 2014, I think, and his name is Scott Wilson. So would you mind recalling that show and speaking on behalf of Scott Jay? The time our connection was all about Kaka'aka. It was all about building a new city. It was all about designing a place that would reflect the true heart of Oahu and Hawaii. They're complicated. It's the material that was in the presentation in Georgia's presentation about trying to be faithful to the Hawaiian ethic and the Hawaiian view of nature and living together. And it was all about Kaka'aka. There were several shows at the time, all about that. And I must say that whatever the dream we talked about was, Kaka'aka as you indicated in your opening, Kaka'aka has not been faithful to that. And there's an awful lot of stuff in Kaka'aka that could be swept out to sea. There would be no loss there. But let me say that a big part of that, Martin, was finding the social structure that accurately reflects life in Hawaii. Life back in the day of the native Hawaiian community. And for that matter, in current day. And I would add one more point. And that is that whatever design your team comes up with, whatever innovative ideas, they come up with about the physical structure, and all the creative new things that you've been talking about. The most difficult and the most nutritious of all of them is designing a structure that will accurately reflect the values that you wanna allow for the city as it develops and that will make for a better society. Your term, Thomas, about the sociology. Our buildings, our structures, our public places should all feed into our society and make a quality of life the best it can be. And so you have a lot of ideas in this project that reflect that. But I think that that is the most important part of it. I wanna echo what you just said because I think this project also forces an engagement. If everyone lives there, what is the ecology? So when they put in the plants, they're gonna find certain plants won't work. They're gonna find out, they're gonna need micro irrigation systems that is not just a simple water system. So they're gonna learn about what ecological systems works. And so all the inhabitants will learn about nature, learn about the plants, what plants work in what area, where it's dry, where it's windy and so forth. So that's part of the genius of your project is forces the engagement to learn what ecology is about and ecology in different locations. And as the world will change with climate change, then built into your environment adaptation. Adaptation of the human spirit, adaptation about human behavior, and as well as the structure around it. So it's a brilliant system because it forces people who live in it to learn about ecology. Plants aren't the same uniformly. They interact. There are nicks and different breeds and different varieties work together and you're gonna find out what works and what won't work together in different environments. If you're gonna put it up in the Iwahiwa or Popakea, you're gonna need different types of plants, different types of insects, different microbeer, different types of what they call soil biomairs, like in your gut, and you're gonna have to figure it out. But that forces the people who live there to be engaged in that life. And so that's the brains of it. As you built this, it forces the sociology of change adaptation to learn about ecology and the largest structure of ecology. Your building is gonna be one giant ecology and it's gonna have different networks of things that work and won't work with insects, mites, fungus, and you're gonna have to learn about that and that's the brains of this project. Thanks, Thomas. Yeah, what you both brought up, Jay and Thomas, reminds me of that, you know, me not a native English speaker observing it that some ways it's discriminating. So like there's value engineering and there's social engineering and there are bad terms, right? But in the best sense of the terms, right? If you look at it, that's what the project tried to do is actually the opposite to a conventional development is an additive. You start to add things and systems, right? One over the other. And the result is that it's not affordable anymore, nor in its initial erection, nor in its maintenance, right? It's too much. It basically enslaves people, right? Or taking on mortgages that they can never pay off for the rest of their lives, rent they can't afford. So this project is, Giorgio is recalled, you know, for us is fried again. There is the, his mother called him fried because she was a woman in the early last century to fight for women rights and freedoms. That's why she called basically her son like that. So the tower is basically the sort of the mechanism, the intention to mechanism to free people from all these slaveries that they're kind of tied into. So the design process then accordingly was more a reductive one. It's like, whenever we came up with an idea, we thought, do we really need this? Because this is what nature is about, right? There's nothing more to nature than it basically and essentially needs, right? So I'm going back to this sort of, you know, show that UGA did with Scott back then. And there was actually this sort of most iconic project that was just new at that time was an Italian architect, Burri, who was doing this beacon project of a tower in Milano, which is in Italy, which is still temperate climate. And he put these large trees on what we call the knives in the balconies. And that was your guy's background picture, Jay, if you recall. And then he started to elaborate on that one. At the end of the show, which we probably have to get to soon, you were asking that critical kind of phasing out question, well, who in the world is supposed to do all that? And then Scott basically scratched his head and he said, well, I've just been talking to this weird architectural professor named this Fang.  And that was one of the many motivations of this investigation, right? That this group here in this collaborative effort did was what one of the most outstanding and non-traditional members, not just of the discipline, but the profession set. We need to step up because if they are doing this in Milano, in Milan, which is still a temperate climate, all buildings should look like that here in Honolulu, where we have the endless summer, you know, seasons and climate. I wanna add one other thing, Martin, which actually your recollection is about to show where Scott remind me of, and that's this. You know, we started out with single family homes, be simple in this state. We went to, you know, Leesold, which was a problem model, if you will, it still is. And then we started doing condos, we did them be simple, we did them Leesold. We have a lot of rental properties now coming up some of these new projects. But what you have presented today doesn't fit in any of those categories. How are these people legally, structurally, conceptually there? All the figures you have walking around on those ramps and, you know, playing in the water and reading and all that stuff, how are they there? Did they own something? Did they own a condo? Well, it's not a condo. Is it fee, is it lease, is it rental? What is their rights?  And I think that, you know, that has to be part of this. It is no form of ownership that we know today. It is a new form of ownership. It is a new way of being there. I have no suggestions for you, but I just think you have to think about that. Your team has to think about it. I know. And I was about to say maybe we need a lawyer to get on board, so you know where I'm going. But you're absolutely right. And I'm referring back to another show that I did a long time ago with Ulf Meyer, who's an architect and architectural critic out of Berlin. And when I was visiting some summers ago, I was expecting him to show me around the city and the capital city and the most fancy and funky architecture. And he was like, it needed him all night to basically answer my question, what I should look at. And he said, Martin, I know I can't impress you with the new emperor's clothes here, so to speak, using the metaphor of additional skins, right? The new facades, they won't impress you. So he basically, his wife is Japanese. And so he wrote a couple of tour guides about Japanese architecture and to make a living, he basically takes German architects to Japan and Japanese architects to Germany. So he had a group of architects from Tokyo there and the project he showed them, he invited me. And it was a group of people who were basically young families, starting families, and they were afraid, like everybody else, including Honolulu, they're gonna be pushed out of the city into the birds, having to live a life they don't want to because they can't afford to live in the city anymore. And they all got together and talked about this and basically said, okay, let's all chip in the resources we have, all the little savings we have, let's all put them together and now start to think about what do we want and what do we want for ourselves and collectively? And then thinking about, can we afford that? And for that, we need an architect. So the architect was nothing else. He wasn't the great genius, right? Master of mind that got us to the kind of the reputation that we have got as architects. They were the facilitators of people's dreams, aspirations and resources and abilities. And the project was, of course, being in temperate climate in Berlin different than Primitiva, but the notion and the philosophy was the same. It was something that they made happen together because they wanted to and they crafted it around itself. And so they were successful in saying, we can still live in the city where urban people, we don't have to be pushed out and we all in the building together. So this is the precedent I can recall in reference to that show that we should look further into and learn as we all say, this is as much an educational devices project as everything else, as you perfectly called it, Thomas, that we will learn from constantly. I want to follow up on what you all just said. I want to make a good metaphor for this. And you kind of touched on a little bit when you're talking about people in wheelchair and they have to cooperate, but you're building community. So imagine if there's any kind of stratification, those guys who live on top, they have to be much better at socialization and having buy-in because they have to actually walk past all the communities to get up to the top. That means they have to be friends, like it's like the Higgs Boson. You have to shake hands before you get to the top. And if that's the premium position, that means you're the most suited to figure out what socialization is. And since there aren't any walls, you're committed to a larger community. And so if there's any kind of stratification, you're forced to figure out what the socialization skills are you need and what type of structuries. So I think you have built into this so many experimentations of socialization, politics, the advantages of being high, low, here and there. You're just touching on a larger fabric that we have to think about. If in fact, it's an open environment, an open structure and you need the assistance as you go up, as you go down and you're invading someone's space, in order to do that, you got to be a really nice guy and you're helping them to get to the top. And that's figuratively to the top. So imagine you have a network of communities where you have to learn those skills. And so those who have to be down below because they can't climb up, but those like the social ladder climbing up, they have to learn the skills to work in a larger community. Whether they stayed on top all the time or it's just they rotate, I think it becomes a beautiful microcosm of experimentation. Is that what you want? Isn't that what you want Martin? That you're not experimenting with? Because he was already nodding in the right direction. I don't care. DeSoto wouldn't know about this because native Hawaiians, that's the way they lived. I mean, there was really, there was the Ali'i, but land was held in common. It was supposed to be for the royalty, for the king, but land was held in common and people would go and they would farm the taro fields and whatever and everything was done in a group kind of communal kind of situation. Same with the Native Americans. So that's the precedent of that type of living. It was the native cultures, native Americans and native Hawaiians. I mean, it wasn't perfect, but that's why it was a communal kind of thing. And I've studied the Hunzes up in the top way. And that's wonderful. And you know the study of Noah Lincoln. So Noah cares about going back historical farming, but he also recognized modernity. So that going towards the future, we have to be able to adapt to different staple foods. And so we have to have capacity to all the convenience that will get us efficiently to produce food, exchange ideas beyond what we're localized to it and we shouldn't lose those types of things. So whatever we built has to incorporate larger network like a larger ecology to include both high technology, sharing of ideas so we can build them. So we don't feel isolated too. So the key thing is that it's an experimentation by which how do we go into the future where we learn to adapt but caring about value systems as well. That's what Jay was talking about. It has to incorporate all those things because we don't want to abandon all the technologies, the advantages of it and the convenience of it because it is still, those advantages opens ideas and that's what we don't want to lose. And I'm bringing into Soto via the phone because he's just emailed because he had to step out. He says, I thought this was very well done. This goes to the team kudos. What I saw showed that everyone had thought of all the possibilities for all the inhabitants and had also addressed them at the beginning of his message, I want to relate to his sorry, I had to pull out of my out but my mother was calling for her dinner and other assistance. So that is where I went and you Thomas can relate very well to that because you both had the blessing to have and had mothers in that upper age of a hundred, right? And you didn't shove them into some 96 to 96 nursing home, right? But you took care of them. And that's basically what the foundation of Primitiva is caring and not outsourcing that to systems, right? And I've been dealing as an architect and sharing with you, getting things up to code and making things ADA accessible, the American Disability Act, we mean well, but we basically said, well, we fund people who are healthy. We can walk the stairs and if it's now a new generation thanks to Tim Hu and Howard, easy breezy external staircase, that's a lot of fun. You go into the stuffy elevator, right? We mean well, but in this case as George pointed out, you know, having people volunteer and saying, hey, I'm going to help you out. I'm going to push you up the gentle ramp. And just to chip in from Larry Medlin, Larry said, when you're stretching tables really tight as they did for the Expo Pavilion and for the Olympics in 72, it's very sturdy. It's not a bouncy trampolini. It has some flex, which is good for the bones and the muscles rather than walking on tough concrete, but it is a very, you know, solid and solidified surface to kind of walk on, right? But to generally basically be walked up the stratospheric spiral, you know, is a very respectful thing versus to say, oh, there's an elevator in the back. Why don't you go there, right? And we see you later, right? That's the point about solidarity that I wanted to, you know? Again, that's what you guys are talking about. This is a thought real quick. You know, history happens very quickly for the students. Almost all the high rises in Honolulu were built within the lifetimes of all of us here in this meeting. That's about 1500 of them, more now. And so what we think is there and been there for a long time actually changes quickly. And so this is the start of change. And we're thinking in the ones and twos, but it's gonna change over time and 50 years will go by and a hundred years will go by. And then maybe people will look at what we have now and oh, that was the old things and they had to change. And we came up with a different system. And it's when people believe like how we're talking now that it happens. We have to have the vision first and then we'll come along. Thank you for letting me share that. No, that's awesome, Socrates. And again, it comes from you not being the scary government guy sitting in his office and always saying, no, it's the opposite. And you sharing, you're coming from your own experience. I'm always sharing with everyone when you said, Hey, me and my own self interest for my family, I'm only buying solid wood furniture as I buy furniture because I know only that's gonna keep them safe because way back, before the fossil era and all the modernism and all the composites you were able to have your staff going into a building that's on fire just barely covering their mouth from the smoke. But now these days you have to cover them up with multiple filters though they don't die of the toxic stuff that's within the smoke, right? So this awareness for yourself, you say, I want my family safe. So I'm basically doing it that way. And that's the way basically, think about what's best for yourself and then make that the foundation for what's best for everyone else with what you create, right? That's the mindset that you taught us and that's part of the project. And as you said, it has been evolving into this sort of more extreme and saying, let's have the least possible stuff that could be a problem. So this was a good, a great review, a great reflection. We're probably all for sure the creating team is extremely exhausted, sleep deprived and there's more work to come in thanking you all for first of all the incredible collaborative and collective work and then the excellent feedback on that one which also makes it part of the cooperation. So welcome to the team of the creators of Primitiva 3. Anyways, thank you all. This was fantastic.