Let's get over to our man Mr. Basil Chapman as we do each and every Tuesday and don't forget folks Basil does an outstanding show here every trading day, 10 to 11 east and standard time also has a great newsletter, the opening call. Now it's very easy to get the opening call folks come over to our website at TFNN, you're going to go into newsletters, you're going to see it right on the left hand side you get the opening call for one month for $149, you get it for six months for $6.95 which is a savings of $199 or 22% and you can get it for one full year for $11.95 which is a savings of $593 or 33%. Now they all come with a 30 day money back guarantee so you know no matter which one you pick you can pick six months you can pick a year bottom line if it works for you stay out to the 28 days that's great you keep it for some reason it doesn't you just cancel it bottom line doesn't cost you anything and just getting the newsletter itself folks okay Basil has about I believe there's 12 archives out there so you can understand how the Chapman way works and how we ride this wave each and every day Basil Chapman what's going on? Hi Tom how are you? I'm doing great man yourself. Very good thank you good and they're nice discussion you just had with Tim he got some terrific work for sure. Yes it's just different which is really cool do you know what I mean? Yes it's the way you analyze this great so I wanted to show you this chart yeah this is the Dow and there's a technique that I've used very often I've used it for years and it basically looks at a price that goes up and then it starts to come down and then it makes a lower highs and much lower lows okay all of a sudden it finds some support and it swings around it makes either a cup or a V-shaped pattern and it takes out that upper trend line resistance so I can expanding cone I see that yeah and if it does that it can have a strong move up we can even go back to the previous high so this chart here we're right on the cusp we're at this moment right here you can see and there's a technique that I developed years ago that I call Chapman inside track if it's on the if it's on the way up I call it the inside track repellent zone because once it breaks that and then becomes a propellant zone and if you see it on the way down in fact this I took it out just do it was getting a little messy which I would have had the two parallel lines here and this expanding cone there would be a propellant zone so everything about the Dow's low that was made on Friday between the I think it was a 27th the 20 let me just double check that I think it was the 20 I should know by now yeah it was a 27th that on balance volume give us a nice turn around the only thing that was missing for me was that the VIX index didn't go up into the high 20s and we didn't have a huge sell-off on that Monday morning to have a nice reversal in today that to me would have been a confirmation that that that could have been the low for this particular part going into the end of the year right of this particular point I think it's a low I've got a lot of information that says the way the markets moving the way the different sectors are moving this could this could hold very well if in the next couple of days any pullback holds about maybe a third of the way down on a pullback and then makes a new leg up that would be very positive so as I was looking at the market at the end of the day on Monday I said you know I love the action in some of the areas and I we've there are certain stocks that had fabulous moves and we just kept missing them because either they went up too sharply or it just wasn't quite what we were looking at the time but one of the stocks that I really enjoyed watching the movement move up and down and then the fact that it pulled back on that Friday and then going to the Monday was Microsoft. I had very good earnings. It's a Dow stock. It's an S&P stock. It's a NASDAQ stock and it's in the XLK which is the S&P select tech sector. So we were very lucky. We got this at 3.38 the next Tuesday. Nice Basil. Great move. Yeah and it's trading at 3.61 but what I really wanted to show you is some of the techniques that I use. This is what if anyone subscribes to my newsletter or goes to those webinars that you were talking about referring to all the techniques that I discuss in detail. One of the things I look at is there's a pattern that we call the dreaded H.  When there's a mix it's red because when there's a mix and the rally goes to a peak A or a B and then fails and takes out that left side low that can be very devastating and we've seen that. I'm just using Microsoft. You can see these arches. There's one that turned around but what's really positive about this particular pattern and that's another reason why I said if this works out this could be really good is that when this H takes out the left side low but immediately turns around and the technical starts to improve. If it closes even one bar above the arch high that says it could go all the way to the left side high. Well, look at this. We got in just over there and look what happened. It made an arch that's the dreaded H but this one was successful because the rule of this H pattern is that within two maybe three bars but usually like a two bars it must close above that left side low and then you've got to see the technicals give really good signals. So in the weekly chart you can see there's this little H pattern, little arch, peak D was in the chat we were always looking at peak D. That's the fourth highest peak. That's where other things can happen. Your objective is to get to a peak D and in this particular instance look what happened. It closed above the very week we got in. It closed above that arch high. Yes. So that immediately says to me 366.78 would be the target but because the monthly chart is in a rising trend there's a chance that it just gets into this inside track on the upside. So if you go just a little bit above it and then we'll see what happens. That's where I expect some kind of a digester. So we're at 361. We did it at 362 today. 366.78 that area is then there's another technique that I use where I try to find the midpoint. I call it the plum line and that's where the number of bars on the left side from the high to the low should equal the number of bars on the right side. Well sometimes the pattern is very obvious and sometimes it's not. In this particular instance I use this little peak right here as my the number of bars on the left side to the number of bars on the right and that takes you to this week, maybe next week but on the usage of my techniques where I use this dash green line I call it the Chattanooga inside wedge target resistance line. Everything lines up that this week we should get really close to the 366 level. So there are a whole bunch of techniques that we were using and this is the first time in a long while that the I have to wait for the end of the week but so far the MACD is cross positive. I needed to see that and there's another technique that I have I've had webinars on where the nine-period moving average is above the 14 and as long as it's holding it can keep you in the tray for a long time. So look it never did I wonder if I can do this I'll do this real quickly now look here yes my chart I'll go to the weekly I can get out of that one here. I don't know if I can find out there it is. So in this particular instance if I'm looking at just click click I'll go to Microsoft click it and I'll press weekly chart and you'll see here's the green moving average and that green moving average didn't go pink it's still green. So that's another technique that I like to use and this one so far is working very nicely. And folks it's very easy to get Basel's newsletter come over to our website at TFNN you see right at the top newsletters you hit newsletters it's right on the second one down opening call hit it new afteraces. Basel have a great one safe one we look forward to show tomorrow. Thank you very much. Every Tuesday and Tuesday Tim or


What would you like to drink right now? Tuscany and Piedmont. Two classic Italian wine regions that I absolutely love. Find out why you should be drinking from these regions. We're gonna talk about it in this video. Hello, hello, hello, welcome back to Exotic Wine Travel. I am your host, Matthew Horkey. Welcome back to the show where we help you drink adventurously so you can expand your palate and expand your mind. I have two of wines from my favorite Italian wine regions here today. And we're gonna talk about why, what makes Tuscany great, what makes Piedmont great, and then we're gonna taste some wines. I'm gonna treat myself a little bit today. We picked some wines that are similar price points from the same vintage, legendary 2016 vintage. These wines retail in Europe around 30 euros. If you're maybe in the U.S. or abroad overseas, they're about in the 40 U.S. dollar range. So similar wines are similar price points. I'm expecting them to bring a lot of quality to the table. You know, Tuscany holds a special place in my heart because it's the region where I really, I felt like I just cut my teeth on wine. I remember I was, you know, when I was just starting to get into wine, I was just tasting mostly supermarket wines. Wines were not very good. But I took a backpacking trip to Europe when I was in graduate school. And I remember being in Luca in the walled city in Tuscany and ordering a leader of House Red. It was probably San Giovese. I didn't know anything back then. And I remember just smelling it for like 10 minutes. My friends looked at me like weird. I just didn't know that wine could have so many intoxicating flavors and aromas. So Tuscany is in the heart of Italy, in central Italy. You know, the grape that it's associated with is San Giovese. Although there's Marlowe, Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Grenache Sera, there's a lot of other grapes and some of the local grapes, Chiliajolo, Colorino. A lot of unique grapes can be found in the area. But when it comes to Tuscany for me, the name of the game is San Giovese. And one of my favorite regions within Tuscany is right here, Chianti Classico.  But Chianti Classico sits in the heart of the region. So you have Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico. These wines are mostly San Giovese. And don't think of it as a super hot region. Chianti Classico is actually quite high. Most of the vineyards between 400, 600 meters. So we're talking in feet like 1200 to close to 2000 feet. It's really high, really cool. It's almost quasi-alpine. You know, when I went there for the first time, I really had respect for the brilliant acidity and vibrancy I could find in these wines. This region for me brings some of the best value for money, fine, age-worthy wines in Italy. And that's why I love them so much. Piedmont holds another special place in my heart. Piedmont is supposed to be the mecca for foodies, for wine lovers.  I'll tell you why. I was using an app called Vivino. For those of you who don't know, Vivino is an application you can use to find user-generated reviews of wines, so anybody can rate the wines. I remember using it for the first time, scanning a wine, and it was going through trying to find the wine in the database. And one of the phrases underneath says, hold on a second, take your time, be patient. It's like waiting for Barolo. And at the time, I had no idea what Barolo was.  After doing some research, I just went to a shop, picked up an aged Barolo, and I remember, wow, I was so intoxicated by the tar, the leather, the rose-pedal type of Rome is coming from that glass. So Barolo, Barbarisco are two of the most famous Appalachians within Piedmont, made from the grape Nebiolo, but there's a lot of interesting red grapes found in the region. Barbera, Dolcetto, Grignolino, Raquetto, Ruque. There's a lot of interesting stuff to be found there, so don't just be hung up on Nebiolo. But when it comes to Piedmont, some of the most classic, aged-worthy wines are Barolo and Barbarisco made from Nebiolo, which we have here today. Now it's time to bring in the real critic. Now we got the real critic here. Here's the toughest palette I know. You ready to take some wines? Let's go for it. First we have the Brancaya Chianti Classical Reserva. 2016, a great vintage in a Tuscan world-class vintage. This is mostly sensio-vesi with Merlot Brancaya. As a producer, tends to make the wines a little bit more broader, a little bit more modern. That's why they add quite a bit of Merlot. Let's give this a go. You look excited already. I like the oak. I met it in the basswood. It's like cedar-y, really sweet-smelling. So for those of you, hot tip, for those of you, if you're looking at these kinds of wines, both Barolo and Chianti Classical, if you see Reserva in the title, that means these wines are gonna be aged a little bit longer, especially in oak. So what do you get on this? It's absolutely something that I really love because Chianti and San Giovese, you would expect something with higher acid, with more sour cherry and brightness. But on the nose, when you put in some oak, it has this really sweet cedar-y nose. I absolutely love. Oh, my gosh. The texture is really, really good. Wow. This is big, structured, sour cherry, red plum, cedar, tobacco for days. It's a bit of this sandy texture, but it's not too astringent. You kind of can feel the tannins also on the front palette, but it's not too harsh. It's just kind of young and sitting on the front palette. This is not super modern or polished wine. It really kind of has some traditional, gives me a traditional type of feel, don't you think? Yeah, you can say that. For me, I'm already at this off-the-retaste. For me, automatically when I taste this with the structure, the finish, the age-ability of this wine, this wine is already, to me, like a 92-93-ish point type of wine. Oh, you're actually agreeing. I agree. It has a lot of charm.  It's mouth-fueling as well. It's mouth-coating, not in the sense that it's heavy, but the flavors attack you in the entire palette. I really appreciate the tannins in this wine, which is not typical because I don't know. When tannins sit in the front palette and middle palette, it's usually not a great thing, but in this case, it doesn't disrupt the structure. It's just really light on the front palette and it really fuels the mouth. It's not too... Maybe when you say it's more traditional, I agree as well because it's got a little bit of this oxidative quality that matches so well with the tannins. Oh, everything I like. Okay. Let's move on, shall we? Moro Sebasti. This is the Tres Surdi Barolo, also from 2016. Another legendary vintage in Pia Monte. This is a blend of three vineyards. Most of the fruit comes from La Mora, a village that's more associated with more softer Barolos. Easy drinking. Lighter colour. Yeah. What do you think here? Very nice. As usual, his wines have such great purity. It's so funny because often when we taste Barolo, at least for me, the fruit doesn't jump out immediately at me.  But for his wines, I often find this really beautiful rightness immediately on the nose. This is more floral, kind of more petite. This is a little bit more manly. It's really interesting because earlier when you said this is more of a traditional type of wine, I couldn't fully agree I was sitting on the neutral side, but when you compare this to exactly, this is definitely much more of this polished, cleaner, elegant style, whereas this has a little bit of this really cute, not cute, but attractive rough edges to it. For me, more mushroom, more tipa hazelnut, tight notes, perfume, rose petal, cranberry, sour cherries, thinking let's give this a go. For me, this has more of an oxidative style. A little bit of this walnut natinas. Wow, the acidity. Two very different wines. Two very different wines. What do you think here? It's funny, you know, I find that this, when it comes to tannins, most of us would agree that the Biolo tannin is pretty prominent and you really feel it over here. But this is probably a little bit more astringent. But I find that the Chianti classical has firmer tannins. For me, this is more, I think we should have done it in the opposite order. This is a little bit bigger and I think this one is a little bit more finessed besides the tannins. I agree. I do agree. But I do think the tannins here in the Biolo is a little bit stronger, whereas, yeah right, the Chianti classical has more body and... This is a wine everybody's kind of kind of like right away. It's fruity, more voluptuous. This has a little bit more nuances. I'm kind of in the same range. I think that maybe the Biolo might age a little bit better, maybe 92 plus-ish. I have to re-taste both. They're both in the 90s. They're both really, really good wines. I think that's the thing, right? At least for me and I can... Like the other day we were tasting the same thing here like a San Giovese and also a Barolo. And it was... It's often difficult, right? When you pair certain wines with Barolo, it doesn't always stand out immediately. But at the end of the tasting, right, very frequently people including myself tend to lean towards the Barolo because of this elegance. That's what you prefer. Honestly, now I would like from Kaya a little better. But I do think there's a potential that I usually would turn back to Barolo at the end. I would say that this is for people who actually appreciate the oaky quality. It's not really full-fledged toastiness, you know. But this has this really nice, sweet, vanilla, savouriness on the nose. And this is definitely for me. And this one is definitely much more for people who like a little bit more elegant style of wine because you really smell the florality on the nose, right? So that's what I would go for. So both these both these wines and these regions didn't disappoint today. Oh, yeah, always. I mean, these are two pedigreed regions. Like I said, they don't disappoint. It's just all a matter of preference for me. This is a little bit bigger, broader, easier. This has more nuances, more for kind of like burgundy, peen and the water type of drink. What would you like to drink right now? Can I choose both? So guys, check it out. There's both beautiful wines, classic regions. You know, it looked like everything worked out well. So if you like this video, please subscribe to our YouTube channel, Azotic Wine Travel. And we will see you at the next episode. Hello. Thanks for watching. Hey, you made it to the end. Make sure to subscribe to our YouTube channel. Click the bell so you know when new videos are out. If you like content like this, check out our Patreon page where you get some behind the scenes exclusive content. Thanks for watching. Cheers.


It is now time for oral questions and I recognize the Leader of the Official Opposition. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you, Speaker. My first question is to the Premier. Yesterday the Premier finally admitted what Ontario families, mayors, municipal councillors, medical professionals and most of his caucus already knew. That his plan for retroactive cuts to everything from public health to childcare to emergency services was reckless, irresponsible and put families at risk. Yet the Premier still claims that he plans to make the same cuts just next year. Why does the Premier think that the cuts that failed so disastrously this year are going to work better next year? Questions to the Premier? For you, Mr. Speaker, our government was elected to clean up 15 years of mess that the opposition created, the Liberal government created. $347 billion and just think over the last 10 years, Mr. Speaker, they've doubled the debt. The NDP doubled the debt along with their partners, the Liberals. We were elected to clean up the mess and I'm glad to see the municipal partners that we spoke to yesterday, many mayors right across this province acknowledge there's actually waste to be found. There's tons of waste in federal, provincial, municipal governments. I know the NDP and the Liberals have come to realize how much waste there is of taxpayers' money down here. We were elected to clean it up. We look forward to working with our municipal partners. They've acknowledged that there's waste and we're going to give them a little more runway. So it's a good news story. The news story yesterday was a good news story. Order. Start the clock. Supplementary question. Well, for months the Premier has stood in his place and denied the damage his budget was causing. Anyone who raised a legitimate concern was fear mongering. Anyone who pointed to a serious problem was spreading false information. Now, even when he's been forced to admit he was wrong, it's unbelievable that the Premier is still planning to impose the same municipal cuts next year that failed this year. And if that's not the case, what other services to people is he planning to cut as part of his fiscal fantasy speaker? Questions for the Premier? Well, Mr. Speaker, we listen to the municipalities and we are a government that listens. We listen that they can save money. They know there's a tremendous amount of waste in this government. Not only that, Mr. Speaker, we're going to provide them $7.35 million to support them finding efficiencies. And actually, a lot of the mayors I spoke to are looking forward to taking advantage of the $7.35 million. We're also providing $200 million. We've committed to small rural municipalities to modernize services. I don't know what the opposition doesn't get. This can't go on. It just can't go on spending and spending and wasting taxpayers' money. We have to start respecting the taxpayers and every single dollar from the day we got elected to the day of the next election. The day of the next election, we're going to watch every single penny that this government spends. Member for Waterloo must come to order. Final supplementary. I guess the Premier found out the hard way that emergency services, public health and childcare are not a waste of people's tax tax families rely on. But the reality is that even as the foreign government scrambles to do damage control, very little has changed. They're still moving ahead with cuts to municipal transit funding. They're still ramming through Bill 108, the biggest gift to developers that this province has ever seen, despite serious concerns from municipal leaders. And they're still planning to make the same cuts next year that were a disaster this year. If the Premier actually listens to municipal leaders, what does he plan to do when they tell him they can't afford these cuts this year or next year, Speaker? Stop the clock. Lawn must come to order. The Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry must come to order. The Member for Kitchener Conestoga must come to order. Yes, you are. Start the clock. Premier. Through you, Mr. Speaker, the leader of the opposition got a bang on. She said we're in damage control. We've been in damage control since June the 7th when we looked at the bus. There's so much damage in this province. I've never seen anything like it. But you know, Mr. Speaker, when you talk to the small business owners and business owners right around this province, there is happiest punch. When you talk to the average person, you go out there, you show them there is happiest punch, that someone finally has the backbone to stand up to other governments to say we need to find efficiencies. And Mr. Speaker, as sure as I'm standing there, they're going to find efficiencies. Because there's no one on this planet that doesn't believe there's one, two, three, four cents waste in any level of government. The only people that believe there's no waste are the NDP and Liberals because they created the waste. That's it. I know there's a lot of excitement and enthusiasm in the House today, but I would ask the members to allow the person who has the floor, whether they're asking a question or making a response, to make it without shouting at them. Start the clock. The next question, leader of the opposition. Thank you, Speaker. My next question is to the Premier, but I'll remind him that this June 7th is the anniversary of all of the damage this government's done for a year. The people are all resting today, the Ford government revealed to Ontarians that their plans to rip up Ontario's contract with the beer store are going forward. And they're going to enter into yet another legal battle, Speaker, that is set to cost Ontario families hundreds and millions of dollars. Can the Premier provide an estimate of exactly how much Ontarians anticipate paying rather to get out of this contract? Mr. Speaker, we can't pay on making sure. We kept the promise to bring more choice and convenience to the people. And I don't know what the NDP, if they don't want to give the people choice, or do they want to keep it on one of the conglomerates, as I say, one of the multinational, international, global beer companies, three of the largest in the world, control the market. It was a terrible deal. It was an absolute terrible deal that the Liberals put forward, a 10-year deal, I don't know who signs 10-year deals, to have a monopoly. And what beer company would not want more distribution? What is the reason? This only happens anywhere in the world. It only happens in Ontario. That three beer companies control the market. It's unheard of. Absolutely unheard of. What is the reason? The beer store? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Supplementary question. Well, Speaker, beer is fine. But it's certainly not my priority. It's certainly not for hundreds of millions. Two weeks left in the legislature, the government is suddenly introducing legislation to force through contract cancellation that could literally cost hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of jobs. The government points to this bad deal, this particular bad deal signed by the Liberal government. But the four government happily maintains other bad Liberal deals like private hydro schemes and private hospitals. Somehow a group of well-connected lobbyists has the Premier ready to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in public money to rip up this particular contract. My question is, why is the issue of dissolving contracts with the beer store so urgent for this government? Premier? Minister of Finance. Thank you, Premier. This is not just about beer and wine. This is not just about choice and convenience. This is about creating fairness for the people of Ontario. To be clear, Speaker, the government does not own the beer store as many people believe. It is owned by three global beer multinational corporations. Ken Hughes, our special adviser, stated that the Liberal-Sweetheart deal with these multinationals is the obstacle to us delivering on our commitment. Mr. Hughes states that it is a, quote, bad deal for all Ontarians that, quote, stifles competitions and positions, keeps prices artificially high and prevents new craft beer entrepreneurs from getting a strong foothold in the market. Speaker, the previous government put multinational profits ahead of our families. Speaker, what this is about is the Premier's priorities. Families in Ontario want excellent schools for their kids. They want healthcare that they can count on. Most of this Premier, for a leadership speaker, the only thing he's offering is beer. Stop the clock. I apologize to the Leader of the Opposition. The government's side must come to order. The volume is growing progressively louder. I can barely hear the Leader of the Opposition. Start the clock. Leader of the Opposition. So when they look to this Premier and his priorities, all they see is somebody who's offering more beer. Really, Speaker? That's the priorities for Ontario families. The Premier is ready to lose 7,000 jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in a fight with a beer store, but he can't find funding for children with autism. What kind of priority is that, Speaker? Government's side, come to order. Minister of Finance to reply. Thank you. Well, it's obvious that the NDP do not understand that our parliamentary system gives us the tools to get out of these bad deals signed by previous governments. Our legislation ensures we can get the best possible deal consumers and taxpayers won't be held hostage by multinational companies. This sweetheart deal, Speaker, is a, quote, a terrible deal for Ontario consumers and small businesses. Left alone, it will continue the unfairness of this system for the next six years. Speaker, you have to wonder why these multinationals and nationals supported by the NDP would be so opposed to selling their products in more convenience stores, more grocery stores and big box stores. It's because the sweetheart deals with the Liberals is so lucrative that they are choosing to ignore the economic opportunities before us, the 9,000 new jobs it can be created, the $3.5 billion that will be added to our GDP. Thank you. Again, the Leader of the Opposition. My final question in this round is to the Premier again, but I got to say, the Premier and his caucus and his cabinet like to call everybody fear-mongers. Well, they're nothing but beer-mongers, Speaker. Financial Accountability Office tabled their report looking into spending at the Ministry of Health. The Premier insists that spending is on the increase, but when the FAO dove into the numbers, they found something quite different. Perhaps the backbenchers would like to hear exactly what the FAO said in his report, Speaker, and I'll tell you what they note. And I quote, the 2019 budget projects a net spending reduction of $2.7 billion over the next two years. This is in the Ministry of Health. They also note, and I quote, the FAO cannot disclose the $207 billion reduction by program area as the province has deemed this information to be a cabinet record. Can the Premier tell us what health services he's plans to cut in order to find $2.7 billion and why the Ford government would try to keep that information secret? Off the clock. The member for Whitby must come door. The member for King Vaughan must come door. The entire government side needs to come door. The opposition must come door. Start the clock. Premier to reply. To the Minister of Finance. Thank you very much, Speaker. Certainly we thank the FAO for his report and his confirmation that our government's measured, thoughtful and responsible path to balance is credible and the plan laid out in budget 2019 will put the province on a sustainable footing. Speaker, the title Protecting What Matters Most We're taking a balanced approach to managing the province's finances. We're already succeeding the success of our plan. The business community has hired 170,000 people in the province of Ontario. That tells you our plan is working. We know the opposition does not share our vision. Their priorities are to continue to tax more, to spend more and get less, but we will continue our responsible path to balance while providing true and real relief on protecting what matters most, the people of Ontario. Speaker, for months the Premier has insisted that his cuts don't have any consequences. I think the Finance Minister is trying to tell that same story. The fact is, after yesterday, no one believes them anymore. The Premier can accuse the Financial Accountability Officer of fear mongering. In fact, they can call him a lefty if they want, but the numbers are in black and white, at least the numbers that the Premier will let us see. Is the Premier willing to do the right thing, Speaker, and reverse the health care cuts, the $2.7 billion that were identified yesterday by the FAO in health care cuts, or is he once again going to deny reality, ignore public outcry, and pretend the cuts just aren't happening? Questions for the Premier? Well, thank you for the question. Let's be perfectly clear. The budget is fully costed, and all efficiencies and all value-for-money initiatives are accounted for. Let's talk about what's in black and white. What's in black and white in the health budget is a $1.3 billion increase in the budget, a $384 million increase in hospitals, a $267 million increase in home care, $1.75 billion for 15,000 new long-term care beds, many of which are under construction this very minute. $90 million, Speaker, $90 million for low-income seniors' health care. I can't wait for the NDP to stand up tomorrow and vote in favour of giving $90 million to 100,000 long seniors in need of dental care. I can't wait for that tomorrow. Stop the clock. The member for Essex has to come to order. The member, yes, yes, you. The member for Waterloo has to come to order. Start the clock. The next question, the member for Flamborough-Lambor. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Premier. Speaker, our government was elected to clean up the fiscal mass left behind by the previous Liberal government. For 15 years, there was reckless spending and promises made on the backs of taxpayers in an attempt to simply stay in power. Last June, the people of Ontario voted for change. They voted to end the wasteful spending of the previous government and to get our fiscal house in order. Speaker, that means we need to make tough decisions which is what responsible governments do. Can the Premier please explain to this House the actions our government is taking to return to balance while protecting what matters most? Questions to the Premier. Thank you very much. I want to thank the fabulous incredible member from Flamborough-Lamborough. Finally, they have a voice up in Hamilton rather than the people that want to spend money up there. Mr. Speaker, we were elected again. On June the 7th, they cleaned up the financial mess of this province at the NDP and the Liberals created the $347 billion long-term debt left to the children and grandchildren. Mr. Speaker, you hear him always talking about children and grandchildren. Where are we going to leave them? A debt of $347 billion, $13.3 billion dollar interest every single year. Matter of fact, Mr. Speaker, we've been here an hour, it cost us a million and a half dollars on the interest that the NDP left us. You can't continue on with the socialist mentality that the NDP is right. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And back to the Premier. When we committed to balancing the books of the government, we also made it clear that we expect our partners to do the same. And we are helping them achieve this. The Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing previously announced $200 million to small and rural municipalities. And our government has announced over $7 million in funding through the Audit and Accountability Fund to help municipalities find four cents on the dollar in savings. Speaker, can the Premier please speak further to the announcements he made with the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing yesterday to further our work with municipalities to find savings and bring Ontario back to balance. Premier? Through you, Mr. Speaker, and I thank the NPP again from Glambroke. Mr. Speaker, I talked to numerous mayors over the last week. Every single one of them, every one of them, said yes, we can find savings. They admitted they can find savings, so they admitted that there's waste. They asked for a little bit more time. We sat down, we said, okay, we're going to extend the runway a little longer. We're going to support you. We'll give you $7.35 million any of the large urban mayors. We said to the small municipalities that they've taken advantage of, we'll support you with $200 million because when you find savings, it goes right back into the pockets of the taxpayers. And for 15 years, the taxpayers haven't been respected around here, Mr. Speaker. They've been inspected. All they do, it constantly is want to tax and spend. Our government doesn't believe in tax and spend. We believe in creating jobs, prosperity, growth. Well, for every single Ontario resident. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Clarkdale. Thank you, Speaker. My questions to the Premier. One in five children and youth in Ontario will experience a mental health challenge. Yesterday, the Financial Accountability Office published a report that revealed the Conservative government cut $69 million from children and youth mental health program compared to the year before.  Does the Premier believe that these children and their families should fend for themselves because they are not what matters most to his government? Questions to the Premier. Through you, Mr. Speaker, we take mental health and addiction seriously. We ended up committing $1.9 billion to mental health. But you know, sir, Mr. Speaker, when the federal government supports us, I give them credit. I give the federal government credit to match the $1.9 billion. We put $3.8 billion back into mental health and addiction. We're making sure we go after core services to support people with addictions of mental health. There's no government in this country that has put $3.8 billion into supporting mental health. I have all the confidence in the world. I have all the confidence in the world and our minister of health. She's making sure we are not leaving anyone out. No one at all knows we're going to be making sure we're going to have mental health. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Premier and his government talk a lot about mental health and addictions but so far what we see are direct cuts to frontline care and services. In fact, the Conservative government failed to match the $174 million federal investment in mental health and addictions funding in Ontario this year. And now they're cutting $69 million from Children and Youth Mental Health Services. the budget on the backs of vulnerable children. Will the Premier do the right thing, listen to families seeking help for their children, and reverse the deep cuts made to children and youth mental health programs? I recognize again the Premier. Minister Leibach referred to the Minister of Labor. Mr. Speaker, we have made historic investments in mental health. To say the opposite is just not accurate. Yesterday alone, legislation was introduced of the Foundation for Promoting and Protecting Mental Health and Addiction Services Act. We are actually following this select committee. What I know a member of the Opposition was upon on mental health and addictions in 2010. That is one of the key recommendations was to establish a mental health and addictions centre of excellence with Ontario Health. Investments by the ministries coordinating with community services, that is what the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care is doing. We speak about mental health and addictions and help every day in this legislature. Theresa, you had a private member say a lot. Mr. Speaker, there are a lot of pieces to the puzzle in getting health right and mental health and addictions right, but we are well on our way to solve it. Ask the member for Parkdale High Park to come to order. The member for Essex once again to come to order. The Solicitor General to come to order. The member for Waterloo once again, please come to order. Okay, the next question, start the clock. The member for Guelph. Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Premier. Last week a report came out showing that the clean tech sector generates $35 billion of investment in 2017, representing 3% of Canada's GDP. Ontario is home to 39% of this GDP growth, generating 138,460 jobs. Yet your government seems determined to shut the door to these jobs. To date, the government has ripped up contracts for clean energy, cancelled retrofit programs, helping people save money by saving energy, and now you are cutting programs that support job creation in innovation and clean tech. Mr. Speaker, will the Premier stop attacking innovators in clean tech job creators by reversing cuts to community tech, Mars and other innovation programs that are creating Ontario jobs and helping grow clean tech business? Thank you. And again, remind members to make their comments through the chair. Questions to the Premier? Minister of Economic Development. First, the Minister of Economic Development, John Creighton. Thanks very much, Mr. Speaker. We, as the new government here in Ontario, have had to make a number of very difficult decisions over the last number of months since we've been here. But the one thing that I can tell you is that we're continuing to work with our partners in the clean tech sector. We're certainly working with our partners in the innovation sector. And when it comes to groups like Communitech or Mars, we've worked with them every step of the way. And the one thing that I will say, Mr. Speaker, is that they understand the challenges that our government is facing when it comes to the $15 billion deficit here in Ontario, and that everyone is going to have to work together to make sure that we're getting the end result that we all want. And that is that Ontario is on a fiscal financial footing. Because if we are fiscally responsible here in Ontario, if we're working with our partners in the innovation and tech sector to ensure that we're getting the outcomes that we want, we will continue to see the type of job growth that we have experienced over the last several months. Mr. Speaker, 170,000 jobs have been created here in Ontario. All sectors. And that's because we're working with our partners. Supplementary question. Mr. Speaker, given the Premier's response that he received at a recent international tech conference, I would suggest that the Minister work a little more closely with the tech sector. Any good economic strategist will tell you that you need to skate to where the puck is going, not to where it's been. Ontario is well positioned to be a global leader in the fast growing clean tech sector. If we support the sector, Mr. Speaker, supporting young people in the tech sector is key to our success. And it will also help tackle the high youth unemployment rate of 12%. So Mr. Speaker, if the Premier is not going to restore cuts to community tech and Mars and other innovation hubs, will the government at least restore the youth job link and the employment youth talent incentive that was helping tech businesses hire young people to give them the help in the hands-on job experience to succeed? Questions we referred to, Mr. Economic Development. Thank you again, Mr. Speaker. I can tell you that we've been meeting with people who are working in the tech sector right now. Ontario is exploding, bursting at the seams when it comes to our tech sector jobs. Mr. Speaker, whether it's at Kanata North and I had the opportunity there where they're serious about tech with our Minister of Training Colleges and University or this morning I was at a digital media creator, Mr. Speaker, where they're making video games that are being spread all around the world. Mr. Speaker, 65 jobs right now at the company that I was at this morning headed for 250 jobs in the next couple of years. And you know why they're expanding, Mr. Speaker? They're expanding because the government has tax incentives in certain areas, but we're also creating an environment where they can be successful by reducing red tape, working with my colleague here, the Minister of Government and Consumer Services, to make sure that we're changing procurement in Ontario so that we can be extremely successful and continue to see the type of grob joke in the tech sector that we want to see. Thank you very much. The next question, the member for Sault Ste. Marie. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry. In Budget 2019, our government committed to protecting what matters most, and that includes protecting our environment and our natural resources. Invasive species cost Ontario taxpayers billions of dollars every year. In fact, recent studies estimated the impact of invasive species in Ontario at $3.6 billion with a B, Mr. Speaker, dollars every year. Our Made in Ontario environment plan recognizes these impacts and is committed with working with partners to combat, prevent, detect, and respond to invasive species. Mr. Speaker, could the Minister please update our House on the recent announcement where our government committed to supporting the important work done by the Invasive Species Centre in my writing of Sault Ste. Marie. Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I want to thank the great member from Sault Ste. Marie for that question. I also want to thank him for making the funding announcement on behalf of our government for the people. We know that we must continue to work together on all fronts to identify and respond to the threat of invasive species. The Invasive Species Centre is a leader in invasive species science, education, and action, and we believe that they are in the best position to protect our ecosystems province-wide. Our government recognizes the important work the Invasive Species Centre does through research and on-the-ground actions to prevent the introduction and spread of invasive species, and we are pleased to announce that we will be investing $850,000 to support their continued efforts. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I want to thank the Minister for that great answer. The Invasive Species Centre does vital work, and people across Ontario know that invasive species pose a real and active threat to Ontario's lands, lakes, rivers, and our economy. Since 2011, when the Invasive Species Centre was formed as a strategic initiative of the Ontario and the federal governments, it has served as a unique example of partnership and as a hub for collaboration. By bringing together governments, industry, Indigenous communities, and academia, the Invasive Species Centre plays a leading role in coordinating our efforts to fight invasive species in Ontario. Could the Minister please elaborate on how much invasive species cost the people of Ontario and what our government has focused on as we continue to combat their spread? I'd like to know that. Minister. Mr. Speaker, thank you again to the member for the question, and perhaps no one knows the cost of invasive species better than Bob Lam, President of the Invasive Species Centre Board of Directors, who had this to say about our government's announcement. And I quote, the made in Ontario environmental plan, environment plan, recognize that preventing invasive species is the single most effective and least costly method to manage invasive species. In fact, for every dollar spent on coordinated multi-jurisdictional prevention activities, $3 in mitigation, regulatory, and depletion costs can be avoided if only one such pest is prevented from establishing. The Invasive Species Centre is committed to working together to find efficiencies in the fight against invasive species, and thanks the government of Ontario for its support and commitment to protecting our natural spaces and economy. I think Bob's got it right. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. The next question, the member for Davenport. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Premier. Speaker, following a massive public backlash against the Premier's cuts to municipalities, he's decided to give them a bit more runway. Runway, I think, was the word used before bringing down the acts on childcare, ambulance services, and public health. But when it comes to our schools, the runway to adapt to this government's massive education cuts is getting shorter every day. These cuts will hit students hard this fall as they return to larger classes and fewer course options and less time with teachers and other education workers. Speaker, school boards are finalizing their budgets right now. It is not too late for the Premier to do the right thing. Will he reverse his cuts to our schools? Questions in place of the Premier? Minister of Education. Thank you. I'll start off by saying perhaps the member opposite missed the memo. We're actually increasing spending in education. We are getting education back on track because we inherited a system that was absolutely broken and failing our students. We need to take steps in terms of getting it back on track. Let me tell you, we're working with our school boards, and I'm pleased to say when I was at Northern Ontario last week, the school board, the Kuwait and Patricia school board actually indicated to me that they will be able to find 4%. Other school boards across this province are keeping their head down and working with us and identifying ways to achieve efficiencies. The fact of the matter is, we are working on introducing an opportunity for school boards to work with us. We've invited them to come forward and say, yeah, we would like to participate in the audit and accountability exercise that you're working through because surely school boards across this province can find 4% of the money. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and back to the premier. I got to ask you, what does this government have against kids cutting 69 million from children's mental health, slashing our classrooms? And I'm happy to brief the minister, Mr. Speaker, on how her budget is shortchanging our kids.  This government knows it. We know it. Families know it. Students know it. I heard first-time last week from parents and teachers in North Bay and the minister of finance's own writing where half of all secondary teachers in a single board stand to be lost, along with 62 in elementary school, 62. Speaker, as we sit here- Governments side, come to order. Member for Essex, come back. It's causing enormous anxiety, Mr. Speaker, and the programs that help our most vulnerable students are at risk. Will the premier take a second look and change course before it is too late? Minister of Education. Tina will absolutely reject all the dramatic, preposterous nonsense that's coming from that member opposite. All the drama that she's trying to create, sincerely, I say to her it has no merit whatsoever. When we go across the province, the member from Niagara West actually shared with me that no teachers are losing their jobs. As we go, school board, school board, we are going to get it right and we're working with our partners. Let's talk about our budget. Our plan and education that works for you is absolutely gearing up to make sure that after 15 years of failing our students by the Liberal government under Kathleen Nguyen and Dalton Montgomery, we're getting things back on track. I met with those Ontario Student Trustee Association last Thursday, Friday, excuse me, and they are absolutely on board with making sure that we're engaging and we're preparing students for the job- Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. There's considerable noise on both sides of the house and it's rising. I'm going to ask the members to come to order. Order. The next question, the member for Orléans. Merci, Monsieur le Président. Thank you, Mr. Spiekup. Earlier this week, this government had the transition child benefits to their seemingly endless list of short-sighted cuts. It is a program of last resort that gives families money for food and basic needs. Mr. Speaker, I believe that in this house we can all agree that children should have food and clothing. They should not be cold and hungry. Meanwhile, the Premier and his government are spending millions on peddling beer in corner stores. So, Speaker, is the Premier okay with having cold and hungry children in Ontario as long as it's easier to buy a beer? The questions to the Premier. Minister of Transportation. We're moving forward with social assistance reforms that will restore dignity, encourage employment and empower the province, which is most vulnerable to get back to a path of self-reliance. The previous government, which the member opposite was a member of, had a patchwork of benefits and support programs that forced families to spend precious time searching for relevant resources through multiple offices. Mr. Speaker, our government is committed to helping families by simplifying the complicated and unequal supports. The Ontario Child Benefit provides families equal access to government support for those who filed their taxes. That's why we're increasing our investment in the Ontario Child Benefit by $31 million for a total of roughly $1.2 billion this year. There will be a slow and gradual wind-down of the transitional child benefit and recipients will be notified directly in advance of the implementation date. Mr. Speaker, we're dealing with the record deficit and debt that that member opposite was a part of that devastated our services in Ontario and we're protecting what matters most. Thank you very much. Just a supplementary question. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I certainly would have appreciated the Premier answering the question about his importance for children or beer in Ontario. And I think so far what I've heard time and time from this government is the importance of beer all across Ontario. I'll remind this government also of last year's decision to slap our Franco-Ontarian community in the face by cutting the French language services commissioner and abandoning the Francophone University. The Francophones, the Francontarians, the Francontarians and Francophiles, we are a community, important community and we have like a bilingualism. The Premier has made a choice to spend up to a billion dollars, a billion dollars to sell beer in corner stores. Why is selling beer more important to him than the Francophone? The member for Kitchener, Conestoga, once again to come to order. The member for Markham Stovill must come to order. The Minister of Transportation can reply. Thank you again, Mr. Speaker, for that question. But I can tell the member opposite on this side of the house we're determined to sit four years straight and serve the people of Ontario who elected us last June 7th. Not run off and try to join another party, which is down-destining the polls and highly doubtful that they're actually going to retain power, Mr. Speaker. But Mr. Speaker, let us be straight. That member opposite, part of that government, is our $15 billion deficit. Over $300 billion debt. $1 billion a month is servicing that debt. Over $13 billion a year goes to service the interests on that debt. Could you imagine what we could do for services across this province if we weren't servicing that deficit through to this province of Ontario and hopefully she's not going to join her comrades up in the federal government and do what they did to Ontario, Mr. Speaker. The House will come to order. Start the clock. Next question, the member for Carlton. Question is for the fantastic Minister of Training, Colleges and Universe. Job seekers in my riding of Carlton are frustrated about the skills gap that is preventing young people from finding work and employers from finding the workers with the right skills. And the previous employment services system inherited from the Liberals was complex and Mr. Speaker, it did not produce results for job seekers, employers or taxpayers in Carlton or across the province. And I know that it is a priority of our government to address the skills gap and connect our young people with high quality, well-paying jobs in sectors that are in high demand. Through you, Mr. Speaker, can the Minister please tell us how our government is transforming our employment programs to ensure that Ontarians in Carlton and across the province are prepared for the jobs of today and tomorrow. Minister of Training, Colleges and Universe. Thank you, the member from Carlton for her very hard work and she's an amazing MPP and transforming employment services so that they are innovative, responsive and create good local solutions. The previous Liberal government supported by the NDP did not deliver for job seekers, for employers or for Ontario's economy. We are modernizing our employment services system by creating a new model that integrates social assistance, employment services into employment Ontario to help the provinces most vulnerable, including those with disabilities, to break free of the poverty cycle. Our government has promised the people of Ontario to create good jobs and make Ontario open for business and that is exactly what we are doing. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you to the Minister for her hard work for job seekers in Ontario and getting this province back on track. It is so important that we ensure our employment programs are responsive to the needs of the job market so that job seekers in Carlton and across the province can actually find good jobs while taxpayer dollars are respected. There's an urgent need to connect Ontarians with job opportunities and lead to a prosperous career, and the previous employment services system failed to do that. And that's why I'm so pleased to see that our government has a strong plan to refocus our employment programs in a way that will benefit all Ontarians and help make Ontario open for business and open for jobs. And through you, Mr. Speaker, can the Minister tell us more about how our government is supporting employment programs that are adaptive and forward thinking? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you again to the member for her question. Speaker, not only are we improving service delivery of employment programs in Ontario, we are also investing in innovative technologies that will support job creation. I am proud that the member from Leeds, Granville, Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing was able to represent the government in Brockville last week to announce that our government is providing more than $1.4 million to help create a cutting-edge career exploration tool for jobs in the steel and aluminum industries. The Brockville-based Employment and Education Centre will lead a project to develop virtual reality software and work closely with regional employers to create virtual career exploration modules, allowing job seekers to learn about career opportunities in a dynamic and interactive digital environment. The VR modules can later be used by employment service providers all over the province, ensuring Ontario is open for business and open for jobs. Thank you, Speaker. The member for Hamilton West and Caster Dundas. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Premier. After a huge backlash, the Premier and his Conservative government were forced to back down on their deep cuts to municipalities and the services families rely on, like public health and childcare. Well, this is good news. We all know that the cuts aren't going to stop. Last week, the Financial Accountability Office's analysis found that the Premier's reckless drive to balance the budget, no matter the cost, will require another $6 billion in cuts to programs and services over the next three years. So having been forced to back down on cuts to public health, childcare and ambulance services, Mr. Speaker, my question is, does the Premier plan to cut next? The question is to the Premier. Minister of Finance. First Minister of Finance. Thank you very much for the question. Again, we thank the Financial Accountability Officer for confirming that our government's measured, thoughtful and responsible path to balance shows that it is a credible plan that was laid out in Budget 2019. That puts the government on a sustainable financial footing. We need to acknowledge in this Legislature, yet again, Speaker, that the previous government was spending $40 million a day more than they took in, and that is absolutely unsustainable. And, Speaker, we told the municipalities, the agencies, the boards and commissions that we will look for four cents on every dollar. And, in fact, we have found almost eight cents on every dollar spent. And all that, Speaker, while returning, we will return $26 billion of that back to every family, individual, senior and business in the province of Ontario. Report. Because I don't know that that's what that report said at all. And I would just have to say that this falls under the category of fiscal fantasy on the part of the minister. So by cancelling cap and trade, offering tax cuts to the rich, by risking a multi-million dollar lawsuit from the beer store, the conservatives have created more instability and uncertainty. And the Moody's Credit Rating Agency responded to the Premier's mismanagement by downgrading Ontario's credit rating. Now, not only is this government's mismanagement undermining our economy, it is hurting our families. So far, this government has attacked children, people living with disabilities, seniors, Franco-Ontarians, indigenous people, and everyday families with his callous cuts. So I again ask, Mr. Speaker, who will this government target next? The Minister of Finance. Well, thank you. I realize that the member may have missed many items in the budget had she actually read the 383 pages because it talks about the fact of our low-income individual and family tax credit returning $2 billion to the lowest income earners in the province of Ontario. She may have missed the memo where we're giving 300,000 families an opportunity to have up to 75% of their childcare paid for. $2 billion investment. Speaker, we are offering the business community the accelerated capital costs which allows them to write their equipment off earlier. They've done that and they've created 170,000 jobs, Speaker. I don't know what part of this the member doesn't get, but it's $26 billion that's being returned to families in Ontario. And again, I can't wait for you to stand up and vote in favour of giving... Thank you. Thank you. The next question, the member for Kitchener, Conestoga. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Energy, Northern Development and Mines. We all know our government is committed to making a big difference for our communities in the north. After 15 years of neglect, we promise to step up for the people of Northern Ontario. The Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation is one of the tools we are using to deliver on that promise. It was created by a former PC government and we are continuing its legacy and making strategic investments throughout the north. Not only are we creating jobs, we are also protecting the cornerstones of Northern communities by supporting the work they do. Can the Minister please expand on other initiatives we are taking to support the people of Northern Ontario? Mr. Conestoga, Energy, Northern Development and Mines. I want to thank Matthew McAnlis, the Executive Director of the IISD Experimental Lakes Area, Dr. Michael Patterson and the Asper family, in particular my friend Gail Asper. Todd Sellers, a good friend of mine and President of Lake of the Woods Sustainable Foundation for understanding the vision that we had, Mr. Speaker. When I first announced a fish biological studies place at the ELA, of course, we found a place in deterioration. Hardly could be called a world class, Mr. Speaker. By investing in a partnership with IISD, we've elevated this to the world class facility it is, Mr. Speaker. We now have hundreds of students from high schools across Ontario coming there. Top flight universities. Lake had my alma mater, Milton McGill University doing important work there, Mr. Speaker. We thank you for them for our collective efforts. And I announced the plans for a training centre there where students from high school and university will be able to learn once and for all and finally the great things that we do in there now. Thank you. The supplementary question. Thank you to the Minister for the hard work that he continues to do for the people all across Northern Ontario. The International Institute for Sustainable Development Experimental Lakes area is a unique world class organisation recognised globally as a leader in quality science and research that helps us to protect our water systems. The scientific work being done here helps inform policy decisions that benefit not only Ontario, but also Canada and countries around the world. I know the Minister is very proud to have such a world class facility at home in Northern Ontario. Mr. Speaker, could the Minister also update the House on the additional resources that our government for the people is investing in the experimental lakes area to support their important work being done at the facility? The Minister of Energy. Northern Development and Mine. Minister of Natural Resources. Referred to the Minister of Natural Resources. I also want to thank my colleague Minister Rickford for the tremendous work he has done on this file and his commitment to the experimental lakes area throughout his entire political career. Our government is putting people first by working to ensure we can continue to enjoy and benefit from our freshwater ecosystems. We recognise how fortunate we are to be home to many lakes, rivers and streams that provide recreational and tourism opportunities and significant contributions to our economy. That's why our government will be investing up to $2 million in 2019-20 to ensure the continuity of ongoing multi-year research projects and important long-term monitoring of the experimental lakes area. This investment will help deliver on our commitment to ensuring clean waterways and drinking water which are integral to Ontario's economic stability and well-being and I thank the Minister of Northern Development for continuing to make sure that we understood how important this was. My question is to the Premier. Ontario is experiencing stronger and more frequent floods as a result of the climate crisis. Ten communities are in a state of emergency. When asked about these devastating floods the Premier said something is going on and we have to be conscious of it. Yet this Premier has slashed the conservation authority funding for flood management by 50%. We know this government does not take the climate crisis seriously but they could at least provide the funding necessary to help Ontario families deal with flooding emergencies. Can the Premier explain why amidst the time of record floods he is gutting flood management programs? Questions to the Premier? Minister of Natural Resources. Thank you very much I want to thank the member opposite for the question and I don't think I need to remind him that our government inherited a $15 billion deficit from the previous Liberal Government that your party supported 98% of the time. So you wear some of that as well and we made it clear that things were going to change and what we have said to conservation across the province of Ontario is that they need to concentrate on what the opposition must come to order. I apologize Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry. Please conclude your response. They need to concentrate on what their original mandate was not the mandate creek that they've created for themselves over the many many years and we have said to them we are cutting your funding which amounts to across the board on average about 8% of a conservation authorities funding in some conservation authorities less than 2%. We have said to them you need to concentrate on your core mandate and the commitment flood forecasting to ensure that Ontario Thank you. Supplementary question. Speaker, this government continues to lurch from one short sight at Paul Z to another leaving a fiscal mess behind them. The August flooding in Toronto caused $80 million in damage. Storms and floods in February of last year caused more than $57 million in damage across southern Ontario and Quebec. Floods that happen once every 100 years are now happening once every few years. Municipalities and families cannot cope with these costs. The programs used to mitigate damage are cut and the programs used to assist people and municipalities in repairing after a devastating flood are cumbersome and difficult to access. Can the Premier explain to the people of Ontario why he is cutting flood management when the people of Ontario need it most? Well, I thank the member for that supplemental question and I do remind them again of the fiscal mess that we inherited from the previous Liberal government. As I said we have said to conservation authorities stick to your mandate, stick to what you are designed to do. But I also want to point out that my ministry continues to monitor water levels all across this province. Our surface water monitoring centre that headquarters in Peterborough monitors water levels all across the province. I also want to say while I have the opportunity how our hearts have gone out to the people who have suffered by floods this year and I want to thank the Premier for instituting an internal task force that has had three regional meetings across the province now to sit down with people and we will have public meetings further to sit down with people to understand the effects that those floods have on people. I want to tell you my colleague the Minister of Museum of Affairs is there for the people of Ontario. We have their backs. That is one thing you can count on the people of Ontario. This government has your back. The next question is from Mr. Saga Lakeshore. Thank you Mr. Speaker. My question is for the amazing minister of tourism culture and sports. I was delighted to hear the minister launch a call to develop Ontario's place earlier this morning. I know many of the members in this house along with countless other Ontarians have fond memories of Ontario place. I'm glad to hear the government is taking action to revitalize this important attraction. In doing so we're sending a clear message Ontario is open for business. The former Liberal government failed to prioritize Ontario's place and let it fall to disrepair. They did not value the full potential of this incredible unique waterfront site. Mr. Speaker can the minister please explain and call for the development process which will seek to transform Ontario place into a world class year round destination. The minister of tourism culture and sport. Thank you Mr. Speaker and I'd like to thank the member from Mississauga Lakeshore for the question and for the great work he does for the people of Mississauga Lakeshore. Mr. Speaker today I was at Ontario place with the minister and my good friend and colleague the minister of infrastructure to announce the next steps our government is taking to redevelop Ontario place into the world class destination it was originally envisioned to be. We are beginning a worldwide search Mr. Speaker to find a partner or partners with the best and most innovative ideas that will bring our vision for Ontario place to life. It is our intention to create a spectacular destination a world class destination that will bring visitors from the entire world. A worldwide search to find this partner Mr. Speaker and the process is designed to provide as much flexibility as possible for interested. Thank you very much. Supplementary question. Through you speaker. Thank you to the minister for your response. It is refreshing to see that so much of this untapped potential of Ontario place will finally be utilized so that the space can be enjoyed by new generations of Ontarians along with other tourists from outside Ontario. Mr. Speaker we saw a process earlier in this year inviting interested proponents to submit their ideas for future of this site. Can the minister please inform this house to have change with respect to this proposal. Minister to reply. Through you Mr. Speaker the announcement today set out the formal process for organizations or consortia teams to submit formal proposals for the site. We also made it clear today the proposals including a casino will not be considered and I will confirm in the house today and to all members that there will be no casinos I'm also excited to see the best proposals that can come forward from around the world. We want to see the concept of a very important. We will be subjecting these proposals to rigorous criteria for respect for our heritage and for respecting our future. The Honourable Minister of Trade and Development at the time Ontario will be the world's most exciting island. The response Mr. Speaker will look forward to seeing that the new Ontario place will be the world's most exciting island once again. This concludes our question period for this morning. Government house leaders inform me he has a point of order. A quick point of order Mr. Speaker a key strategist in our legislative unit is turning 61 today happy birthday to Richard Heimple. Member for Scarborough Agent Court on a point of order. Mr. Speaker today marks the 101st anniversary of the independence of the First Republic of Armenia. The Armenian community in Toronto Ontario and entire Canada are celebrating this milestone and today the Armenian community of the GTA they will be here for the flag raising and after that there will be a reception between 4 and 6.30 tonight at room 247. Everyone is welcome to join them. Thank you. We have a deferred vote on the amendment to government notice of motion number 62 relating to the allocation of time on bill 108 and act to amend various statutes with respect to housing other development and various other matters. Call in the members. This is a five minute bill. Going to ask the members to please take their seats. On May the 27th 2019 Mr. Beeson moved an amendment to government notice of motion number 62 relating to the allocation of time on bill 108. All those in favor of Mr. Beeson's motion will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the clerk. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Mr. Beeson. Ms. Nguyen. Ms. Nguyen. Madam Lelon. Madam Lelon. Ms. Hunter. Ms. Hunter. Madam Derozian. Madam Derozian. Mr. Shriner. Mr. Shriner. Mr. Hillier. Mr. Hillier. All those opposed to Mr. Bissau's motion, please rise one at a time. Be recognized by the clerk. Mr. Smith, Bair Quincy. Mr. Smith, Bair Quincy. Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker. Mr. Tomson. Mr. Thompson. Mr. Bethan Fowler. Mr. Bethan Fowler. Mr. Fidelli. Mr. Fidelli. Mr. Ford. Mr. Ford. Mr. Ford. Mr. Ford. Mr. Austin. Mr. John. Mr. Scott. Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones. Mr. Bradford. Mr. StraggBotetty. Mr. dreams. Mr. Jack. Mr. Franklin Mr. Matt milk. Mr. Mr. Mr. McCann. Mr. Nichols. Mr. Ramanon. Mr. Harris. Mr. Harris. Ms. Gamari. Ms. Gamari. Ms. Hogan. Ms. Hogan. Mrs. Feet. Mrs. Feet. Mr. Joe Willardale. Mr. Joe Willardale. Ms. Canjens. Ms. Canjens. Mr. Piccini. Mr. Piccini. Mr. Cramp. Mrs. Cramp. Mrs. Y. Mr. Y. Mr. Anon. Mr. Anon. Mr. Rashid. Mr. Rashid. Mr. Sandu. Mr. Sandu. Mr. Pang. Mr. Pang. Mr. Teddy Gassler. Mr. Tanigasa. Mr. Roberts. Mr. Roberts. Mr. Sebaver. Mr. Sebaver. The ayes are 42, the nays are 65. The ayes being 42, and the nays being 65. I declare the motion lost. Are the members ready to vote on the main motion? Yes. We will now vote on the main motion. Mr. Walker has moved Government Notice of Motion No. 62 relating to allocation of time on Bill 108 and act to amend various statutes with respect to housing, other development, and various other matters. Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carries? Yes. There are some notes. All those in favour of the motion will please say aye. Aye. All those opposed will please say nay. Aye. In my opinion the ayes have it. Aye. Calling the members, this will be a five minute vote. The notice of motion No. 62 relating to allocation of time on Bill 108. All those in favour of the motion will please rise one at a time and be counted by the clerk. Mr. Walker. Mr. Wood. Mr. Stan daran. Mr. Rey. Mr. eighty. Mr. Miller Perry Samus Coker. Mr. Letcher. Mr. Letcher. Mr. Koh. Mr. Koh. Mr. Downing. Mr. Downing. Mr. Ghill. Mr. Gill. Mr. Koh. Mr. Kohlander. Mr. Klam. Mr. Klam. Ms. Serma. Ms. Serma. Mr. Parsons. Ms. Skelly. Ms. Skelly. Mrs. Martin. Ms. Marques. Ms. Tranta Foulopoulos. Ms. Sarcaria. Ms. Sarcaria. Ms. Sarkaria. Ms. Ostra. Mr. Ostra. Ms. Mitas. Ms. Mitas. Ms. Parch. Ms. Parch. Ms. McKenna. Mr. Van Tot, Mr. Horvath, Mr. Nattershade, Mr. Fye, Mr. Satter, Mr. Bagham, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Mamakoh, Mr. Yark, Mr. Carpoche. Mr. Armstvo, Mr. Stiles, Mr. Kernahan, Mr. West, Mr. West, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Gates, Mr. French, Mr. Miller Hamilton-East Honi Creek, Mr. Andrew, Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Birds, Mr. Burns McGowan, Mr. Arthur, Mr. Urquers, Mr. Bergie, Ms. Morris. Mr. Acosta. Mr. Hardon. Mr. Harden. Ms. Montice-Farrell. Ms. Montice-Farrell. Mr. Hassan. Mr. Hassan. Mr. Fraser. Mr. Fraser. Ms. Wynne. Ms. Wynne. Madame Lalonde. Madame Lalonde. Ms. Hunter. Ms. Hunter. Mr. Hillier. Mr. Hillier. Madame DeRosier. Madame DeRosier. Mr. Shryer. Mr. Shryer. The ayes are 66, the nays are 42. The ayes being 66, the nays being 42. I declare the motion carried. There being no further business this morning, this House stands in recess until 3 p.m. . .


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebreaks.com with the New York football giants random number block Randomizer for pick your team number 29, which is already sold out. It'll be in a separate video That's how that works if you're new to this And big thanks to these folks for getting into it. There are the numbers right there. Let's roll it. Let's randomize it Four and a five nine times for each list. Good luck one ninth and final time a couple Daniels down to Ruben nine times for the numbers And ninth final time after nine. We've got five down to six All right, Daniel with five and two Michael with three send in with four Matthew with eight Daniel with seven Thomas with nine Paul with one Thomas with zero any and all redemptions for the New York football giants including one of one redemptions Paul you'll get live one of one's Ruben with six Let's order these numerically right here And in a separate video will be the break itself jaspyscasebreaks.com. Bye