She was seven. I'm back. So I had a video request to do a Topic of how to know when your relationship is over when to leave Okay All this depends on certain things. Are you married? Are you just in a relationship? Do you have children? Are you being provided for? Are you the provider? Okay, so let's just take an example of each so First off if you're just in a relationship, no kids. No one's providing for anybody. Everyone's equal You know when it's time to leave when you don't see yourself with that person in five years The way that they are currently now if you can't imagine your life with somebody in Five years, and that's probably not the person for you if you have been with someone and they keep repeating patterns that are not beneficial to the relationship and It's basically dragging you down or draining you emotionally That's a that's a red flag for you to get out the relationship because Can you imagine five years of that and how much time and energy you will lose? How much of your youth you will lose wasting on someone who? It's not going to be there. You know in the long run. So I Tend to Think that entering into a relationship the first year of that relationship is kind of you know all the red flags will come up You'll know if this person is responsible You'll know if they have their priorities in order You'll know if they are good with money You'll know all these things and if you you know See yourself with this person in the long run because all those things, you know are good Then by all means stay in the relationship But if you see your relationship and headed, you know for a cliff Jump off before y'all both fall. Okay? A lot of people make decisions based on emotion when it comes to relationships But this is a big part of your life. This is a major decision in your life this affects the rest of your life and If you're making those very important decisions based on emotion and not logic, then you're probably going to kind of Make the wrong decision Okay, so when you go to buy a house or a car or apply to a school you Look at things logically. You look at numbers. You look at you know Statistics you look at All the things on paper before You make a big decision. Okay, you check out the neighborhood you check out the You know if this car Lasts or not if it has a warranty if this this isn't that But some people will just hop right into a relationship and stay there even though it's unstable It has no equity which means no future and it has no value to one of the persons in the relationship And you'll stay there just because you're emotionally attached That's like finding a house. That's your perfect dream house Just beautiful has everything you wanted and in a cheap price Okay, you're about to you're about to go close on this house But then you realize it's in a very bad neighborhood And very unsafe and that's why it's so cheap. Do you continue do you close on the house? Do you buy the house even though your security? It's at stake. Your life is basically at risk The value of your home is not going to be as much because of the neighborhood It's it are you still gonna go forward and purchase that house Probably not right? It's the same thing when you when you find a car. Let's say you're you're shopping for a car You find a used car you find a really nice luxury vehicle, but it has like All these miles on it it's been in an accident, but it's been repaired so no one could tell it's been an accident There's no warranty left on it It's expensive. So you know the maintenance is going to be expensive the parts are expensive So if you break down guess what it's coming under your pocket The insurance on it is high. So there you got to go up there but the car is Nice and it brings up your status and you know, it's your dream car Even though it's a few years older and it's like, you know No one the body style hasn't changed and you can get away with it If you really just want it to be flashy and show off Would you buy that car knowing they could break down any day You couldn't afford to fix it and all your money just went into it Would you invest in that vehicle or would you opt? For a more reliable vehicle. That's nice as well, but you're going to be paying more for quality Than you are for flash Which one are you gonna choose now a lot of people are going to choose based off their emotion and what? The outside world thinks about whatever, okay That's why you'll see a lot of broke people with nice cars Sitting in their driveway of you know a roach-infested apartment That's why you'll see a lot of people living, you know in a bad neighborhood In a decent house Because instead of investing in their security and safety They would rather have the big flashy house and risk getting shocked Okay, there are neighborhoods like that by the way. You don't know. Yes. Okay. I was looking at houses a While ago and their perfect house popped up. I'm like, this is everything we need. Oh my god Look this part straight up by the bad side of town or people get rod and shot daily Okay, it was a newly built house. So you would think it would be in a newly built neighborhood But basically what happened is they tore another lock down and built this house up big mistake. Okay So basically what I'm saying is it's time to leave your relationship when the stability It's not gonna be there in your future if there's no equity in it If it's not really worth your investment on paper. Okay, you can fall in love and feel giddy and Passionate and You know all Schoolgirl crush schoolboy crush with anyone that's new and looks good. That's just anybody. Okay but what you can't have is Two people who are going to make logical decisions together who will make sense together Who have their priorities in the correct order? So if you are stuck in a relationship with someone who it's like what we consider a loser And who's not doing anything with their lives and you Realize now that that in love puppy love feeling has worn off and that this person It's not who you wanted them to be or to turn into Or it's not the person that you thought that they would be and you want out But you feel sorry for them because you invested all this time my advice for you is to sit down and have a talk say look I Thought While I was like so deeply in love with you That you would become the man that I envisioned myself being with in the future But you haven't even started on that journey yet You're not even close to it. You're not even trying to become that and I'm going places and I Need certain things in my life that you're not providing right now And we've you know, we've been back and forth. I just think it's time for me to move on I think I've outgrown you. Okay, you can you can say that you've outgrown that person It's not a big deal people out grow each other every day or we've grown apart. We want two separate things, you know tell them why you're leaving them and Hopefully it will help them make a decision on how to improve upon their life So that the next person that they come in contact with won't have to have that same talk with them And if you're the person that's getting left, you know If someone's breaking up with you because you're not doing anything with yourself That should be a wake-up call to you. You know people don't leave loving relationships for no reason. Okay, people don't live Leave loving relationships unless it's missing something. Okay, people would cheat off through up and through a relationship But they won't leave it only time that people leave a relationship is when they're not benefiting benefiting from it anymore Okay, they don't feel a hole. They don't feel fulfilled.  They can't get by themselves or from somebody else, but even more so It's time to leave a relationship when you're no longer being benefited by it emotionally financially or spiritually, you know Some people grow spiritually and they have to leave their partner because their partner still stuck in a certain mindset that the other person Evolved from and just doesn't work anymore. I have so many people come to me and say, I wish my partner would get on board with, you know You know how I think and feel spiritually, but they're just stuck here and let me tell y'all that's not really a good reason to leave anybody because You evolved and they didn't spiritually when y'all got into the relationship y'all are both on the same level And it could work to your advantage Actually to have someone who's not as spiritual as you because they see things from a different perspective You know, some people get real spiritual and real blinded or real paranoid or overly Into conspiracy while the other person is still kind of grounded in the in the world And they see other things that are going on And they can keep you grounded as well as you can lift them and open their eyes on certain issues So it's kind of good to have someone who's not just like you.  I'm staying here. Okay. Oh, no.  I know that we don't get along right now, but She has potential. She has a future.  I'm not leaving. I'm not going to where I've invested too much into this relationship to leave So a lot of people feel like they've invested too much financially And as far as time and youth to actually leave the relationship. So either they find a way to work with it To think differently about the relationship to accept certain things about the relationship Or to see it in a whole new light, you know For what it is and detach either Emotionally and use more logic, you know treat it as a business because a lot of times that that lovey-dovey Puppy loves stuff hand-holding, you know, all that kind of stuff wears off over time, you know, and You say, okay, look, why am I still here? This is why I'm here This this this you can name a thousand reasons why you're still there and why it's benefiting you So you're not going to break up with that relationship But if you can name five things that's bringing you down, oh my credit's getting bad. Oh this this and that He cheats.  Uh, you know, it just named everything, uh He lost his job, uh He went to jail. Um, he got court fees. He has medical bills. We don't have insurance If that's all up in your relationship The time to leave is now, okay I know people say through thick and thin But how thin are you going to wear yourself? Okay, sometimes self-preservation is the best option. Okay, now if you're if you're dealing with, uh, You know, someone who you fell in love with and that's why you married them or got into the relationship with it Because you truly love them and that love is worn off and there's nothing else Then of course you're going to be faster to leave than someone who entered into a relationship Based on financial security because they never went into the relationship for love in the first place They went for that security and until that security runs out. They don't really care. They're not going anywhere They're like whatever whatever has that marry you for love. I married you for money So a lot of people will stay in relationships based on the reason they entered into them. Okay You know, a lot of people see things from different perspectives. Oh, why don't you stay with him? He does this to you he cheats. He he lies. He does this He does a call and then you'll see someone who calls and it's honest, but the lights are out You're sitting in the dark with no food. Okay, so you got to make a decision Um people have certain reasons why they stay with their significant other. Um Some people will say, oh, I'm with a married man and I'm dating a married man and I can't leave him I'm in love with him But think about in five years. Are you going to be with that man still? Is he going to find a new person a new mistress? Is his wife going to find out and if his wife finds out takes everything from him and he can't even afford a mistress anymore Are you still going to want to be with him if he's like kicked out living in, you know one bedroom apartment With, you know, a lesser car than he has now. You can't take care of you or take you out. Are you still going to love him? um you know And I'm all for people doing what they want to do But when it's time to leave the relationship, you got to look for the red flags and look forward five years If it's not good bounce Okay, all right. I hope that this helped someone And if you have any questions or if you want to tell your story, um, put in the comment


The best IELTS essay the Sniper instead of dumping everything they know about the topic onto the page The Sniper is hyper focused on answering the question They only have a small number of ideas and they fully develop those ideas every word every sentence every Paragraph focuses on just answering the question and that's how to write


Righty. Yes. The title is correct. This is a Yukon striker construction update weirdly enough Um, as you know when Yukon striker open for the season things seemed rush things seemed incomplete And it looks like that was true because now that the park is closed Construction on Yukon strikers area is continuing. So as you can see in the middle of the frame Um, you have the storage area where they store the trains being enclosed in a themed building close-up shots also show similar structures to the top of the station Roof those little design kind of window chimney things being added to the top of the storage Building as well From what I understand. This is so the trains can be enclosed In the winter as well and then they're theming it and I have a feeling you're going to see other areas Like the turn of the station. Um, that area was greatly uncompleted or incompleted So I have a feeling we'll see that area kind of like finished up as well for next year And the cliff jumping that is coming to Canada's wonderland. Nothing new has taken place over there The fencing system has been removed. We did notice one more hole kind of like Just off to the back area of the grass hills So this might end up actually being a bigger than we even thought if you think about it They have to fit in a pool and the cliff. So if that makes sense the little kind of three Holes you see there covered by wood are probably the pool and then the cliff will be just behind that So there are like little dugout holes Um behind those three that you can see with the wood planks Um, and yeah, nothing going on with mine buster I don't think you're going to see anything going on with mine buster now from what I understand and what I've seen from driving on What's the street called major mckenzie, uh, we've seen some weird activity going on with wild beast It looks like they might be retracting some of wild beast again Um, but no retracting of mine buster or retracting going on on mine buster area yet No signs of anything on mine buster just this weird big dirt hill that they've built Um next to mine buster again as I talked about in my previous video It looks like splash works is now on a strong chokehold It's got no land to expand in except for the forest and mine buster's plot of land And then I mean if you really wanted to do it you have whitewater canyons forest and plot You could bulldoze and turn into a water park expansion, but I don't see that happening So there's hardly anywhere to sit in splash works currently now with the cliff jumping coming You've got it in a strong chokehold and it's at an extremely busy park and this place is crowded And I will not be going to splash works anytime soon, especially with nowhere to sit. Um being removed, but nonetheless, um Winterfest looks absolutely stunning from the sky I did notice a themed area in between the lift hill of vortex and the drop on vortex It looks like there's a little midway there for winterfest. That looks really cool But nonetheless, hope you enjoyed this quick construction update on uconn striker as weird as that sounds Don't forget to give the video like subscribe. We haven't and share this video for you Enjoy. Have a good one guys. Bye


You may be praying for your unsaved loved one, and the more you pray for them, it seems that the further they drift from God. The more you witness to them, it seems the harder their heart becomes. And you've done everything you know to do, put your trust in God, even when your flesh wants to do otherwise. You hold fast to the promises of God, and the promises of God are yes and amen.


How's it going everyone Caleb here with Leighton sports cards next night? We're working on a six-box break of 2022 luminance football. This just released a couple of days ago. This is number 13 in random team style Thanks again for getting in on it here are the results from that random Let's get right to it. See what we can grab guys Good luck. Good luck Three autos looking for one man. Here we go. These cards look really nice I like them. That should be a good time. Base there Base rookies Evan Neal not bad there We've got AJ Brown there number to 149 Titans Kenneth Walker that's gonna be autographed to 299 Seahawks not bad on the rookie auto One of the top rookie running backs taken Kenneth Walker. We go the third Then that is a trailing Burks base cards here They're a nice feel to them as well. Yeah in addition nice coding Rookie this time Trey McBride to one or excuse me to 249 there cardinals Trey McBride Next up. It's Kyler Gordon. That's autograph.  You're one You go bears Good luck all Wilson and mills Tyrell Geer Falcons got James Robinson number to 50 Jaguars Nice one there Jaguars to 50 And Vinny test of Erty this time that's going to be patch Jets not numbered What an interesting one to toss in Test of Erty there and then a Justin Fields vestige Very cool inserts Raven's legend NFL legends Vinny test of Erty There's a second year T-Law how weird is that How weird is that the first second year's always feels so strange Nice, you're uh jamar chase second year to 25. That's a good one to get eight at 25.  We'll be right on to number 14 after this tonight and then select h2 After that, uh, that's Nicoby Dean to 149 for the Eagles Nicoby Dean Nice Antonio Gates, it's going to be chargers nice auto 20 of 25 This guy was good for so many years.  That's what I mean So I think of him and Tony G just holding down fantasy leagues It's gonna be a Justin Ross to 249 there you go chiefs could have a good year See we're a good career. Maybe Khalil Shakir. That's gonna be autograph. You're one Khalil Shakir, you gotta look Oh Nice you're one auto it bills there not number And hey, there he is Sam Howell dynamic Very cool Sam Howell Fantasy legend for sure though. Yeah Big time can you pick it rookie? Not too bad and Aiden Hutchinson as well. Got a Lamar Jackson 1099 for the Ravens nice Tyler Boyd this time on the patch bangles intensity patch not numbered There you go Cincinnati And we got Dak Prescott their vestige Cowboys Dak next one up here Dak Prescott again James Cook Uh George Carl Aftah five of 25 for the chiefs. There you go. Nice it Very solid C. E. H. Chiefs to 249 Vylus Jones jr. Bears autograph to 100 there you go bears Nice it She seedy It's like I can't do anything about that Show's over It's like what is he doing? Holy if I can't handle it no one can Geez It's like man rough night. I guess I'm gaming to 249. It's going to be Tyree kill dolphins Sounds like it's been a good one over there. Nice one dolphins And Doug Williams for the uh buccaneers. That's sick four of 25 Color match Yeah, why not color match bucks It's got the throwback logo even on there. Very cool Nice one buccaneers and fusion of Nick Shubb Super Bowl champion Doug Williams. That's a cool card actually That's clean looking Really clean looking Josh Allen orange uh to 50 Josh Allen Hey, there he is Derek Stingley jr.  He is Texans Jeffrey H. Very nice man Awesome Stingley.  Sheesh Hey man sauce gardener. I feel like you're gonna be fire Yeah, nice hit there Congrats Texans Austin Eckler this time to 99 for the chargers And Bernie Cozar. That's going to be browns patch 21 to 49 He's making me so impatient because he said What college football or football cards in general and yeah all the talk Wait randy. What's the gator score? Sean they must have I know anthony richardson had that two point couldn't agree more von Couldn't agree more AJ Brown there to uh 35 that's titans on the AJ Brown that time Jordan Davis to 249 Nice one there eagles Jordan Davis And the Kobe Dean eagles autograph number 13 of 50 not bad. There you go eagles You should be really good as well.  That's a shame says forest Boris come on forest. Oh, man Yes, that it's a 149. It's going to be christian Watson their packers There he is Uh, Ezekiel Elliott patch card not numbered intensity cowboys Here we go And savages george kittle always john always That's what he gets paid for honestly Uh, sheesh is going to be the fifties Jalen waddle I can't believe I have to say that word that many times to 249 Right It's so unfortunate Uh fedarian mathis that's football team to 249 Kennedy brooks autograph that is eagles number to 100 nice one eagles Solid hit there Trey McBride Wow, man. Wow, we see for us. We see how it is I understand man Carson strong Eagles there and lemar jackson the 149 radens radens are having a good break George pick ins for the stealers autograph top 50 There you go Nice one stealers Congrats on that very sick dynamic metcalf Very sick evan neal again. Not just serious Uh, d.mo. Samuel the 249 solid and sky more That's gonna be uh chiefs autograph sky more. Are these chiefs? Yeah Sky more there you go. Nice one chiefs. That's what i'm saying randy Camara vestige One week. It's central florida one week. It's florida state Next week. He doesn't watch or like college football Sam's onto something I'm just Forest is going to be out just as fast as he came in here Seems like tonight. That's some h my head. Uh, jeremy ruckards. There you go jets.  Welcome to the club a forest. I didn't say anything mean. I'm just sitting here breaking Just remember that This time it is a breeze hall.  That's chiefs there And ravens isaia likely autograph to 100 He'll ravens Isaia likely Fusion of teal off This is true john This is true just in jefferson there to 99 just in jefferson vikings Uh 900 points random to all at the end Shortly here coming up And she's justin herbert's Colts this time on the jonathan taylor to 249 there you go And ooh autograph bailey zap there you go year one auto very cool congrats on that one patriots Nice hit on the bailey zap not numbered Uh cooper cup rams vestige Next one off That's what it was like in connecticut vaughn like yukans literally like the Literally like the bottom ranked school and division one and football every year Like literally i think they were ranked like 129th out of a hundred That's really rough just Can't root for that exactly to 149 justin fields bears totally get it And chris olave saints nice auto there saints congrats to 50 chris olave That's funny that What's up matt you're right up there as well matt use the allen wrench to Connect oh man be one that's my second calling sauce gardener zack wilson the 249 jets Herbie there he is patch jumbo patch not numbered Chargers and it's dynamic jalen herds Here we go here we go Let's keep it going a couple left Can you pick it Kyle hamilton to 99 sick one ravens there he is And ravens against jamal louis sauda grab to 99 Sam's guy there.  So everybody just like pre games and gets drunk and then doesn't go to the game Oh, I know to 35 nick chubb for the browns Oh, I would never work for ikea. Damian Harris to 50 I promise and kelvin austin that stealers autographed to 249 They did do well and a fusion jalen waddle. All right guys, I do have a 900 points card to random right now I'm gonna do that and then we're gonna recap the hits for you. Let's random that points card just one seconds Toss all the names back in the randomizer here Remember it is 900 right 28 spots. This is all the names one more time The name on top will be the person that grabs the points. Let's roll the dice Three times here we go One two three Jeff n congrats on the points Jeff n 900 All right, we had patch cards. Justin herbert chargers not numbered Deontay johnson stealers zeke cowboys bernie co-star to 49 browns Tyler boyd bangles and viny testa birdie jets autograph cards kelvin austin stealers jamal lewis ravens chris olave for the saints bailey zapp patriots isael likely ravens sky more chiefs uh, george pickin stealers kennedy brooks that's eagles micobe dean eagles as well derek stingley jr. Texans uh, dog williams box, there you go vealist jones jr. His bears uh, kalil Shakir bills antonio gates for the chargers uh, kelvin austin stealers a kyler gordon bears And kenneth walker is seahawks. Thanks again so much all hope you did enjoy it. We'll have them all well protected and right out to you


If we could prove, beyond doubt, that our continued posit of an ancient, once highly advanced yet pre-Ice Age civilization once existing here on our planet, we would literally have to rewrite our understandings of antiquity. We have covered numerous sites, found submerged all around the world, yet unfortunately, due to their proximity to islands and the continental regions they are found amongst, many are dismissed as merely being five to ten thousand year old ruins, fitting with modern paradigm and alas avoiding controversy or the questions which inevitably follow. Yet our next site of interest may turn out to not only be that most important of submerged ruins ever found on Earth, but the smoking gun previously mentioned. On the 19th of May 2001, India's Union Minister for the Science and Technology Division, Merli Manohar Joshi, announced that the ruins of an ancient civilization had been discovered off the coast of Gujarat, in the Gulf of Kambahat. The site was discovered by INOT, National Institute for Ocean Technology. Using Sonar, the discovered ruin is now being strongly argued as definitively pre-Ice Age, yet also advanced in nature. NIOT went on to describe an area of regularly spaced artificial structures. Located twenty kilometers from the Gujarat coast and spans nine kilometers, Joshi claims the site as an urban settlement that predates the Indus Valley civilization. Further descriptions of the site by Joshi describe it as containing regularly spaced dwellings, a granary, a bath, a citadel, and a drainage system. According to Wiki, quote, the structures and artifacts discovered by NIOT are the subject of contention. The major disputes surrounding the Gulf of Kambahat cultural complex are claims about the existence of submerged city-like structures, the difficulty associating dated artifacts with the site itself, and disputes about whether stone artifacts recovered at the site are actually geofacts or artifacts. One major complaint is that artifacts at the site were recovered by dredging instead of being recovered during a controlled archeological excavation, end quote. Simply put, due to the fact that it has not been excavated properly, and we predict probably never will, academia are dismissing this ancient city as simply unconfirmed. We feel a quite ridiculous position to take despite NIOT's supporting data of its existence due to its accidental discovery, presumably via dredging. We find the marine archeology in the Gulf of Kambahat highly compelling. There are countless submerged and very ancient cities dotted across the oceans of our earth, many of these cities all but forgotten until their rediscoveries within the modern era. In attempting to locate these mysterious places, it is beneficial for one to be aware of past sea levels. This of course can make the task of locating these submerged cities an awful lot easier. The main consensus is that world sea levels have largely stayed the same since the arrival of Homo sapiens, only really dipping or rising by around 120 meters across the earth. In discussing these finds, you will, on all but a few exceptions, find yourself within these specific regions. One of the more interesting exceptions to this rule has to be the underwater city which was discovered just off the coast of Cuba a few years ago, a submerged city which sits over 700 meters below the waves, this depth of course being far below that which has experienced a breach over the past hundred or so thousand years. A theory that the land mass once rested upon the surface, subsequently being sunk by tectonic activities was argued, yet since its exploration as a possibility, it has been found to have not been the case. The results of this investigation strongly indicating that this city and its accompanying land mass somehow remained under the waves for more than a hundred thousand years. Greenville Draper of Florida's International University concluded that it was highly unlikely that such a tectonic event could have occurred, quoted as saying, nothing of this magnitude has been reported ever before, especially from the Mediterranean. Drapers, among many others analysis, has of course come to conclusions, conclusions which thankfully appear honest, making them extremely controversial, yet as with other fields of study and life, they are reluctant to reveal the implications of such conclusions. For example, if the research is correct, and judging by the extremely capable people tasked with this undertaking, there is no reason to suspect it is not, then this submerged city has remained submerged for over a hundred thousand years. This gives us two possible alternatives, one, that the city predates the arrival of developed man on Earth, according to academically accepted timelines, or two, it reinforces our ever-growing accusations here at Mystery History of a past here on Earth which is unimaginably more ancient than we have been led to believe, a human society which has flourished and regressed on no less than three occasions. It could of course be both. There is a possibility that this ancient city was indeed built submerged under the waves by a once highly advanced civilization of Homo sapiens. Yet a more likely scenario, of course, would be that this ancient city was constructed at a time when the Caribbean Sea was a dry basin, and as the sea began to form, it was subsequently submerged. Yet, alas, modern academia readily rejects such a hypothesis. So if we do not accept this as a likely possibility, then we must conclude that a primitive ancient culture with primitive stone tools and certainly no diving equipment were somehow responsible for the construction of this submerged city, complete with enormous pyramids on a foundation resting over 700 meters beneath the Caribbean Sea. Hey guys, in 1998, a circle of timber posts within the intertidal zone on the north Norfolk coast was brought to the attention of the Norfolk County Council Archaeological Service. A subsequent program of archaeological recording and dating revealed that the structure was constructed in the spring or early summer of 2049 BC during the early Bronze Age. Because of the perceived threat of damage and erosion from the sea, a rescue excavation was undertaken during the summer months of 1999. The structure was entirely excavated, involving the removal of the timbers and a program of stratigraphic recording and environmental analysis. A survey was also undertaken within the environs of the site, which has identified further timber structures dating from the Bronze Age. Detailed examination of the timber from the circle has produced a wealth of unexpected information, which is greatly added to our understanding of early Bronze Age woodworking, organization of labor, and the layout and construction of timber ritual monuments. The purpose of seahenge will undoubtedly be added to the heated debate surrounding that of Stonehenge. The strongest argument so far for such henges has been that of celebratory pilgrimage sites during solstices. Although they remain a mystery, the excavation report was published in 2004 in the National Journal of Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. A more popular, heavily illustrated account will be published by English Heritage this year. The Holm-Tomber Circle, aka Seahenge, is currently undergoing conservation treatment at the Mary Rose Centre in Portsmouth. When this work is completed, the treated timbers will be displayed in the Refurbished Lynn Museum in King's Linen, the UK. Sea of Galilee Although not a real sea, it has remained named as such due to the staunch traditions, mainly religious which have grown and flourished from around its shores. The first century historian, Flavius Josephus for example, was so impressed by the areas surrounding the Sea of Galilee, he once wrote, quote, one may call this place the ambition of nature. Reporting a thriving fishing industry around the lake, with well over 200 boats regularly working the waters, archaeologists have since discovered only one such fishing vessel found in 1986. It has been nicknamed the Jesus boat. According to Christian religion, much of the ministry of Jesus Christ himself actually occurred upon the shores of the Sea of Galilee, and a recent discovery within the waters themselves has continued to perplex specialists within the area, astounding all who have been exploring said discovery, and weighs an estimated 60,000 tons according to researchers. An astonishing size, making it much heavier than any of our modern-day warships. Being nearly 32 feet out of the ancient sea's sediment, it also has a diameter of about 230 feet. Stonehenge for example, which is an impressive ancient structure in its own right, has an outer stone circle diameter of only half that. First discovered in 2003 using sonar exploration of the southwest portion of the sea, divers have since been down to investigate the presumably ancient structure, writing regarding their finds within the latest issue of International Journal of Nautical Archaeology. Researcher Yitzhak Paz, antiquities authority, and Ben Gurion University, believes it could date back more than 4,000 years. Quote, the more logical possibility is that it belongs to the 3rd millennium BC, because there are other megalithic phenomena from that time that are found close by. Paz told LiveScience.com in an interview, noting that those sites are associated with fortified settlements. Could it be that this is where the peoples of Bet Yura buried and honored their dead? Is this a proverbial city of the dead, or something else entirely? As more research is undertaken, it is only a matter of time before we understand this amazing structure for what it truly once was. We will of course keep you posted, thanks for watching guys, and until next time, take as such heavily researched areas of our history, we may never solve the most important question of all, where do we come from? The reason for our growing staunch belief in a lost history is only further compounded by the subjects we research, and indeed the seemingly impossible and as yet unanswered methods that an ancient, clearly once highly capable civilization utilized to achieve such remarkable feats of ancient engineering, and our next item of choice is of no exception. As mentioned, there exists a heavily researched and indeed unraveled history which can be archaeologically found amongst these truly impressive ruins. However, although we are led to believe that academia has a handle on the ancient lives of those who dwelled within these structures, there are many areas which tell a different story, and one must question why. Why is there such gaps of explanation? When we are told that much of what these groups undertook has been researched and understood since the time of Edward Carter, why was the Valley of the Kings lost? Who and indeed how were the ancient pyramids constructed? Many of the things we are now under the presumption have been fully explored are merely rediscoveries, completely absent from the ream of writing and hieroglyphics later deciphered in red. The submerged city of Heraculon, for example. An entire ancient city, which not only clearly dates from the time of the pyramids, but was also submerged in an event we are yet to be informed of. The rediscovery of this site in recent times is yet another example that the attitudes of those who are granted access to such sites is misplaced, and what we thought we knew about the true creators of said sites is a red herring, a smokescreen, placed down by later surviving, and due to these unknown events, proven by heavy research, far less capable, far more primitive a civilization, who merely re-inhabited such sites, allowing them to develop to a point where they were not only able to leave their own archaeological legacy amongst these ruins, but also to claim such intimidating works as their own. Such a reality, such a claimed illusion, would also have made them a perceived force to be reckoned with, an opportunistic strategy that any critical thinking leader would have leapt at to not only preserve one's power, but to ensure the ongoing existence of their own kind. This posited scenario would also explain why the ancient city of Heraculon, and indeed the Sphinx, the Great Pyramids, the Colossus of Memnod, the unfinished Obelisk, and so forth, remained undescribed within what is claimed as the builder's writings, and why such incredible feats were seemingly silently undertaken. Any explanation as to how these sites were built, such as that of Baalbeck over a thousand miles away, possessed Aswan granite columns many tons in weight, remains a mystery. For one can claim such works as their own, but an explanation as to how they achieved them would not be something they could provide. Who built the ancient city of Heraculon, indeed the entire plateau of Giza? Why is the city submerged underwater, and what happened to those who constructed such sites? It is a pursuit for answers, which we find highly compelling. There are countless submerged and very ancient cities dotted across the oceans of our earth, many of these cities all but forgotten until their rediscoveries within the modern era. When attempting to locate these mysterious places, it is beneficial for one to be aware of past sea levels. This of course can make the task of locating these submerged cities an awful lot easier. The main consensus is that world sea levels have largely stayed the same since the arrival of Homo sapiens, only really dipping or rising by around 120 meters across the earth. When discussing these finds, you will, on all but a few exceptions, find yourself within these specific regions. One of the more interesting exceptions to this rule has to be the underwater city which was discovered just off the coast of Cuba a few years ago, a submerged city, which sits over 700 meters below the waves. This depth of course, being far below that which has experienced a breach over the past 100 or so thousand years. A theory that the landmass once rested upon the surface, subsequently being sunk by tectonic activities, was argued, yet since its exploration as a possibility, it has been found to have not been the case. The results of this investigation strongly indicating that this city and its accompanying landmass somehow remained under the waves for more than 100,000 years. Greenville Draper of Florida's International University concluded that it was highly unlikely that such a tectonic event could have occurred, quoted as saying, nothing of this magnitude has been reported ever before, especially from the Mediterranean. Drapers, among many others analysis, has of course come to conclusions, conclusions which thankfully appear honest, making them extremely controversial, yet as with other fields of study and life, they are reluctant to reveal the implications of such conclusions. For example, if the research is correct, and judging by the extremely capable people tasked with this undertaking, there is no reason to suspect it is not, then this submerged city has remained submerged for over 100,000 years. This gives us two possible alternatives. One, that the city predates the arrival of developed man on Earth, according to academically accepted timelines, or two, it reinforces our ever-growing accusations here at Mystery History of a past here on Earth which is unimaginably more ancient than we have been led to believe, a human society which has flourished and regressed on no less than three occasions. It could of course be both. There is a possibility that this ancient city was indeed built submerged under the waves by a once highly advanced civilization of Homo sapiens. Yet a more likely scenario, of course, would be that this ancient city was constructed at a time when the Caribbean Sea was a dry basin, and as the sea began to form, it was subsequently submerged. Yet, alas, modern academia readily rejects such a hypothesis. So if we do not accept this as a likely possibility, then we must conclude that a primitive ancient culture with primitive stone tools and certainly no diving equipment were somehow responsible for the construction of this submerged city, complete with enormous pyramids on a foundation resting over 700 meters beneath the Caribbean Sea. The University of Seville, working in collaboration with the Andalusian Institute of Historical Heritage, has conducted an intensive lidar survey in a historically compelling area between the Spanish coastal towns of Caposoto and Sancti Pitri. Their goal was to discover the remnants of a long-written-of temple, one dedicated to ancient deities. However, what they discovered instead was an incredibly ancient once enormous mass dwelling, complex yet intelligently laid out as if almost akin to modern-day standards of care in regard to sanitation management, food production, and quality of dwelling for its massive population's well-being. A mega-metropolis that predictably the academics responsible for its discovery have not only attempted to downplay the find, but also tried to claim it as merely proof of their original temple assertion. Clearly, they are merely backing the tale of events put forth by whomever funded said expedition. From the researchers themselves, quote, the survey area consisted of submerged landscape, seemingly dominated by a series of ancient marches. Something we feel was most probably intelligently managed farmlands prior to the great deluge, which eventually drowned this entire mega-metropolis, yet I digress. They continued, the study revealed a new ancient coastal landscape with the presence of moorings, an inland port, and several large monumental buildings, end quote. By combining data from previous anomalous discoveries, the team created a cross-section of findings, and by a process of elimination, they pinpointed an area in which to scan. Yet interestingly, after said discoveries of the structures, they quickly and simply delimited the entire area, without any further field study or investigation whatsoever. Could this rapid delimitation of the area, in regards to the lidar scanning, possibly be in an attempt to obscure the true enormity of this pre-flood ruin? During their focused investigation, they found rectangular structures some 300 by 150 meters in size. However, these discoveries contradicted their own strictly followed academic accounts of this supposedly legendary temple's whereabouts. This discovery being the mission's objective all along, yet curiously, as mentioned, any further expansion of the lidar investigations, academic funding, has been stonewalled. Could their reluctance to continue further investigations on a mission which has already clearly cost a lot of funding due to them actually having discovered yet another complexly intelligently clearly advanced pre-flood mega metropolis? Well, we find said possibilities, and the rapid growth of independently-owned lidar technology incredibly exciting. There are many ways to create a misleading, coercive conspiracy, yet nearly all good stories, even when mostly fictional, to upstand some level of scrutiny must contain that which is known as the kernel of truth. And these kernels can be found throughout the mountains of ancient stories, belief systems, rituals, and medicines worldwide. Found throughout ancient texts, however, interestingly, there are countless accounts of a great deluge, however, modern curriculums are not about finding the truth within these writings, but a form of conformity. We not only feel that the evidence for a flood worldwide exists, but that the pre-flood civilizations who lived through this event, claimed as secluded, primitive, small settlements, didn't venture far until a much later academically claimed dating. Regardless of this, we are now slowly exposing the truth regarding said events. Such as ground-penetrating radar are now being utilized more and more. Many of these studies are finding mega-metropolises, often now resting beneath and amongst dense forests, having been revealed via this technology to have been not individual settlements, but one enormous city, some with estimated populations of 10 million people or more, facts which are in staunch opposition to modern dating paradigms. Along with ours, and many others personal, in-depth research into the technologies and knowledge of the creators and later re-inhabitants of such sites, have also been proven beyond doubt to have once had shared knowledge. Unquestionably made by people who were in global communication, endless examples of tools, masonry techniques, and artifacts are often found who have all been crafted in the same ways, with matching scars found at quarries and upon megaliths worldwide. Yet these quarries again bring us back to our original message, that of a shared experience of catastrophe, also one of which being the Great Flood. Maybe these groups worked on huge weather-resistant stones as an attempt to face off against such enormous natural forces, yet it would seem, although they left their mark on the globe, as our research would suggest were in vain, as they were seemingly wiped out in an instant, with many sites abandoned mid-flow during one of these events. Interestingly, not only would the evidence suggest a sudden disappearance of those responsible for many of the most extraordinary megalithic ruins, there have also been remnants found and documented within mainstream-funded study, which is not only indicative of a prior knowledge of this possible swelling of the seas, but an immense effort attempted to build fortresses to protect against such an event, dated as 7,000 years old. From an article titled, quote, this 7,000-year-old wall was the earliest known defense against rising seas. Lizzie Wade states, and I quote, about 7,000 years ago seas were rising all over the world, Ice Age glaciers were melting, and the ocean crept up shorelines and toured people's homes on every inhabited continent. Now, archaeologists have discovered the earliest known defense against those rising seas, a 7,000-year-old seawall built to protect a farming village from worsening storm surges and encroaching saltwater from the Mediterranean Sea. Ultimately, however, the wall failed, and now lies drowned off the coast of Israel, along with the rest of the settlement it was meant to protect, end quote. Additionally, Amy Goussic, an archaeologist at the Natural History Museum in Los Angeles, California, who studied this period around California's Channel Islands, stated, and I quote, all the different kinds of responses we see towards sea-level rise, 7,000, 8,000, 9,000 years ago, we're still seeing all of those same responses today. Discoveries such as these not only proof of our ancient ancestors' awareness in regards to the possible dangers of rising sea levels, but supports the argument that human contributions are not as catastrophic as are currently believed by some to be. The questions regarding their origins, however, who was once responsible for such remarkable efforts, remains a mystery, one which we are determined to solve. It is a journey of discovery which we find highly compelling.


is the screen visible is the screen visible good so here's the code 35363 quickly 35363 good good good good good good good 35363 is the code okay just a quick recap of what we are going to use and implement today right a quick grasp okay of what we are going to use and implement today fine so we are going to use point number one the mirror formula 1 upon f is equal to 1 upon v plus 1 upon u where v stands for the distance of the image u stands for the distance of the object and f stands for the focal length okay please mute please mute guys please mute keep yourself over mute thank you thank you okay focal image and object okay there exists something called as magnification magnification is denoted by m which is equal to height of the image upon height of object output by input kind of that okay so the formula for magnification is height of the image upon height of the object which is also equal to minus v by u minus of image distance by object distance clear these are the two primary formulae which we are going to implement today beyond that yes general properties of spherical mirrors will be utilized okay and things will be proceeding sure sure sure no lens no lens we are not into refraction we are only into reflection today okay Aniket no conceptual questions are also there in between okay and at times which in numericals are also blended with like what we call it as concepts okay good good good good good good good are four ready are four ready are four ready good good good good 58 people are here okay okay okay okay okay let's go 803 is the time let's start 159 people are here okay 804 let's start 60 people are here very good very good very good very good very good thank you Aryan thank you very much relax and respond. Aditya what happened? Thank you Disha. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. What Gupta? What happened? Got confused between R and F right? CNF, R and F type thing yeah? Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. No problem. Relax. Relax. Aditya relax. No problem. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. I haven't seen the user side of it. Okay. 23 people got it right. Sure. So for pretty obvious reason clarification will be required right? Okay. So what is the scenario? An object 5 centimeter tall height of the object is given as 5 centimeter is placed 1 meter from a concave spherical mirror object distance is 100 centimeter as it is in front of a concave mirror and it is object distance it will be counted as negative. Y or N which has a radius of curvature of 20. Now C is equal to 20. So F will be equal to 10 centimeter. It is of concave mirror. So it is going to be negative. Okay. 1 upon F is equal to 1 upon V. We don't know. Plus 1 upon U. Okay. Solving it what will you get quickly? Minus 1 by 10 plus 1 by 100 is equal to 1 by V. LCM is 100. Good. Minus 10 plus 9. Yes or no? Okay. Sure. 1 by V. So from here we have V is equal to minus 100 by 9. Okay. The size of the image is we know that height of the image upon height of the object is equals to minus V by U. Okay. It will be an inverted image. Okay. What is the size? Will be equal to 5 by 9. So decimal conversion please. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Good good good good good good good. Come on. Next question but not here. Okay. But before that the leader board. But you in case of... because you know in mirror policy side is positive and non-police side is negative by sign conventions. Come on. Hitting it the fastest. Very good very good very good. Tabishe is also here. Akshet is also here. here alisha is also here very good very good very good let's look at the next question ready and here we go not left and right side aslesha beta because in case of mirror it is about polished and non-polished side check what's up mongara if I'll check what's up then I'll not be able to see the chats oh this is how it appears ABC leader sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry so then I won't be using it aslesha got it the polish and non-polished side okay so last six seconds 64 people have answered that's beautiful let's see how many of you are right or wrong I hope for a good number of rights oh beautiful beautiful beautiful beautiful beautiful no problem that's you can refresh and come back no problem no problem that's you can refresh you can come back your score will be maintained I guess there is a risk huh congratulations Surya okay er explanation required very good making a very good very good very good no I never wanted any are okay only those friend of mine who need an explanation so it's should send okay the focal length of a concave mirror is 50 okay where an object be placed so that its image is two times and inverted okay okay okay okay okay hmm now 50 50 50 50 50 yeah 1 upon negative 50 is equal to 1 upon v plus 1 upon you oh there are two variables is there any indirect information given is there any indirect information given is there any indirect information given yes exactly height of image upon height of object is 1 by 2 okay now they are inverted minus v by u they are inverted it mean both the v and u will be on the same side both the v and u will be on the same side why or n why or n why or n why or n you who good now from here we can substitute sir is it height of image by height of object 2 not 1 by 2 where an object be placed so that its image is two times sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry thank you very much thank you very much are and you saved a lot of time thank you very much thank you very much thank you very much are in okay so images two times and inverted clear fine both are on the same side both are on the same side because of the word inverted if this would have been an erect case then the image will be like this the object will be like this right so we are not talking about this case we are talking about this case okay from here we can substitute u is equals to minus v by 2 or v is equals to minus 2 u 1 upon minus 2 u plus 1 upon u is equals to 1 upon negative 50 okay so quickly solve 2 u is the LCM 2 minus 1 is 1 is equals to 1 upon negative 50 u is equal to minus 50 by 2 the focal length of economy where an object be placed so that its image is two times the inverted excuse me sir yes dear sir this M should also be negative because it's inverted image it should be minus repeat the last we will be not minus 2 got it got it got it we will come over there one second Anna so got you got you relax thank you thank you very much now from here we are getting the answer as minus 25 this is what happens when you go for this case clear so please mute please mute please mute please mute please mute fine this is what happens when you go for this case it tells you that it will be placed between focal point and pole 25 clear now our case is inverted and that is where you will go for that the height of image and height of object clear so should be of opposite side object is like this image is like this so one has to be counted as positive and the other one has to be counted as negative and that will give you a straight lead this will become plus ok so and then you have your answer as 1 by negative 50 is equal to 2 u 2 plus 1 3 25 u 25 75 now 5 was this question in NTSC where I think and a concept is required a question is required to be solved in odd 50 seconds ok exactly I'll come there that's what clear it has to be deal with the proportion guys clear if you look into the proportion you will get your answer absolutely right and within the very first blink if you guys have analyzed the pattern because in further questions you will need it if you guys have analyzed the pattern as we move toward the image till focal point ok the image remains real and inverted but it keeps on increasing diminished when infinity then comes thola sabada then comes at C equal then comes between F and C greater right or not so that proportion helps you a lot clear so remember that that will lead you to the answer faster than anything else clear clear clear clear clear job next question and before that the leader boat at the seven people answered it right and that to in a good time common again 993 that's good but he is still not the fastest he is still the fastest very good very good very good very good very good very good very good job next question and here we go radius of curvature now is 25 distance is 40 the size of the image should be 11 people have already responded by the time I ended reading the question very good very good very good very good very good good good people are investing their time calculating and responding that's beautiful no problem mungara no problem an object of size 7.5 is placed in front of a convex mirror convex is an important term over here okay at a distance of 40 centimeter the size of the image should be mungara timing hello good good good good good times up times up times up is mute is mute please mute 32 people answering it right and it's muted chalo for pretty obvious reason explanation will be required an object again same same logic same principle this is a convex mirror it's focal length another mute thank you this is a convex mirror it's focal length will be positive radius of curvature is given as 25 so the focal length will be 2 by 25 why are and why are and why are and is equals to 1 upon v is not given 1 upon u is given okay object distance in any scenario is negative from here we can get the value of v quickly 2 by 25 plus 1 by 40 if you want we can go I like this as well 80 plus 25 is 105 okay sure fine now actually you have also cancelled it okay okay fine 5 to 1 here 5 to 100 good chalo in that case which a what is the height of image upon height of object equal to minus v what is v v is positive 200 by 21 by you what is you minus 40 okay height of object will get multiplied and you will have your answer yeah 5 into 7.5 by 21 quickly quickly quickly quickly quickly so 32 people got it right let's look at the leaderboard again magical 991 good good good good good good good good good good good good good question again make the okay here's a question which is no no no no hacks yeah turn you there why aren't quickly over the chart yes yes yes all good no problem no problem no problem nothing is impossible he might have got the answer ki chalo then relax no problem yeah the image found by a convex mirror of focal length 30 centimeter is a quarter of the size of the object so image is smaller the mirror is convex the distance of the object from the mirror is now we should get good number of right answers no problem no problem akshit relax relax relax relax relax good good memory congratulations I hope it is answering correct huh this is the like consecutively fourth question or like the just first or second question and the oh dax because for others it is showing so I cannot predict what might be the cause of problem okay from the server because why will the server cheat only you oh the time is over and 31 people answered it right the image found by a convex mirror of focal length 30 is a quarter of the size of the object height of image is one by four height of the object it's a convex mirror so both the object and image are erect okay the distance of the object from the mirror is if you have to calculate you this is equal to height of the image upon height of the object is one by four and this is equal to and this is equal to minus V by you one upon V plus one upon you you have to calculate what distance of the object you will keep you and eliminate which is equal to minus you by four got it gi gi gi gi I got it good good good good good good good good especially those friends of mine who have not got it right in the first chance okay the reasons can be miscellaneous okay now I think it's a serious time to talk to the service providers yeah if it is only Mungara I can be happy that okay Mungara is a cruel chap it can happen to him right karma comes back come on my dear friend no nothing that Mungara is a sweet chap yeah Neha was the fastest but Neha was the fastest Neha all good good good good good good good let's see let's understand okay relax relax relax exactly pay respect a boy stands straight I read boys stand straight and there are six responses a boy stands straight in front of a mirror at a distance of 30 centimeter now this is a possible one nothing man nothing exists like plano convex in mirror it exists in lenses okay good no explanation required I guess are for required only people who those who need are for required chalo good good good good good good good good next leader board are they okay we can talk no problem let man did not get this answer no problem oops a straight dropped a straight drop of four questions for rank sorry no problem no problem woman you will get it back good good you were playing good dear you were really playing good Pranav is there Disha is here Srishti is also here Ganesh is here our intended was the first fastest one to respond I have seen RN is excellent in responding the conceptual question his concepts are really good here I appreciate you are in whenever a conceptual question come this name appears good RN congratulations dear appreciate very good chalo for Aditya oops neha please come back please come back a boy standing straight number touchy 30 centimeter if the image is equal in size then plain equal not sign plain gone now the image is erect erect means it can be one case of corner cave and all cases of convex but in that one case of concave it is magnified image right or not not one-fifth of the height of the object clear that's why the only answer is convex clear clear clear clear clear clear good good good nothing good Pranav good RN look at the next question no no no no no but a mirror is a single surface mirror is not a combination of two so it can be plano and convex okay lens is a combination of two surfaces so it has to be concave concave convex convex plane convex plane concave like that okay the radius of curvature is 40 okay don't confuse it Mungara is like 1.3 seconds radius of curvature of a concave mirror is 40 centimeter and it is giving lessons to people better 12 questions no 14 I guess I forgot 12 or 14 28 people got it right but there is a huge chunk of people who got it wrong no problem look here the radius of curvature is 40 that means focal length is 20 it's a which type of mirror it is a which type of mirror it is a which type of mirror concave mirror so minus 20 yes or no it will take time up and down okay 1 upon V plus 1 upon U now in the case of a concave mirror okay so of focal length 20 if you check the options if you will check the options if you will check the options my dear friend if you will check the options my dear friend you will find they all are the cases of inverted image why aren't good good good that is giving you direction that minus V by U is that the size of the image is twice minus 2 so you have the answer with you okay 2 minus 1 is 1 next question Pranav Pranav playing good Tamil 987 is a good score now 888 for our dear friend Pranav oh Tamil again jumping up good good good good good good good good Gyanish is there the Tamil is good at numericals that's what is being proved by this hey Aditya Tamil is good Tamil is doing good at numericals good good good good good good good let's see next question like 5000 in all points like big big big scores you guys are a convex mirror has a focal length F very straight no time consuming okay and you get it from red diagram are in that is exactly what what you should not do read a wrong thing in the question a convex and concave are oh people selected everything but only one possible answer was there like if you got confused yes which is showing in the selection 21 people got confused right in 22 got it right dear friend of mine convex mirror if it would have been a concave direct answer a right but it is a convex mirror it is a convex mirror now you know it very well that is why this dear friend of mine was saying I got it by the red diagram in convex mirror the image distance is always lesser than the object distance direct answer got it no I understood by the selection of responses okay good good good good good good good good next question Tamil again 980 good fastest one and leading the scoreboard good good good good good good good good next question just read it I don't think so you guys will need pen 36353 is the 35363 35363 yes Neha suppose you get it right now suppose 54 people have already responded that's good you guys are like still receiving responses motivating still in the scenarios one centimeter tall is placed four centimeter in front of a mirror in order to produce an upright image of a three centimeter height magnified is a single word relatable okay okay okay okay okay okay okay okay explanation required are for required are for required good are very good very good relax very good very good okay okay people forgot the question even an object one centimeter tall its erect image is required so the only possible case is concave now it is placed four centimeter in front of the mirror you can't surely keep it at four because in that case you will produce an equal size image the only answer is 12 okay good good good good good good good good good next question is coming the one missed it again so again Tamil is struggling with conceptuals this champion is excellent in numericals good Tamil no problem what is the fastest very good very good very good very good very good and here we go to the next question we are quite good on time so let's utilize it a concave mirror gives an image three times concave mirror gives an image three times plays at a distance 20 centimeter format for the image to be real and focal length should be good good good good good good good now for the touching of pen will be required told us a munger a blank question add Karnataka Karnataka next time let's have a concept test next time who else with me okay a bit of CC one second at the time at the end of the chapter you remember electricity okay okay why yeah this dear friend of ours is playing good so last 20 15 seconds now you'll have to you spend for us but only for us 29 people got it right and yes obvious as soon as you saw the options dear okay magnified and real and inverted right or not object plays at a distance 20 so 20 cannot be there 30 because if it focal length is 30 then you will get a virtual and erect why aren't right good only 10 and 15 are possible if you you get the answer 15 will give you the proportion of 20 and 3 click click see for clear or you need the equation don't tell me that er equation required clear clear clear good good good good good good but this is geometry this is geometry okay it will follow the rules of geometry who again conceptual Pranav is now are in tendon again this he conceptual question and this champion is good good good are in very good very good very good here we go to the next question aditya that doesn't look healthy dear it's not sportsmanship again this is this is requiring a tsunami of answer yeah tsunami tsunami of answer just think as a little so you will think and you will get it right guys I wanted to see that everyone has responded and this getting close by itself all wrong answers leave in the opposite direction of the right answer last five seconds as I wanted to give a hint and I forgot everyone is asking in the chat where where's the end where's the end where's the end are you are I forgot 0 now CNC CNC are there will be a case when both of them will be at the same position CNC center of curvature and center of curvature guys gi got it please don't do that yeah the question was the minimum distance between the object and it's a real image for a convex for a concave mirror sorry okay Sneha don't tell me this this may have leased may have leased no no no dear no the maximum is infinity in two cases it is possible in two cases right when the object is at infinity the image will be at focus when the object is at focus the image will be at infinity very good very good very good let's look at the leaderboard let's look at the leaderboard let's look at the leaderboard okay so good people are there are in again is the fastest one very good are in you play good when it is about concepts very good excellent excellent excellent I'll talk to you the other way next question 20 centimeter from a convex mirror focal length 10 again a tsunami of answers were required but no problem no problem it is coming now I guess one wave came yeah exactly exactly I kept like understanding that at last at times we lag with duration enough so for that I kept like questions which are not required to be solved okay I forgot better 12 or 14 you can see now how many PPC PPT is out of five again the same thing focal length is 10 it is placed at 20 means it is places center of curvature so the image will be formed at now please answer let's look at the leaderboard children are shuffling iron is again the fastest very good very good very good go into the next question go back to the question we'll do that a single we'll do that okay okay okay and then we'll do that we'll do that here please concentrate on this one no problem we'll come back we'll come back to it no problem for a convex mirror magnitude of u is never equal to magnitude of v yes better because in that case focal length yes or no suppose if it is plus minus then the focal length will be like disturb momenta you're right okay go times up for this question what is this now we'll have to look for the two questions okay okay okay okay okay no problem so what's this this was the question iron was asking our in suppose this would have been a corner cave a mirror right or not this is see this would have been the answer this is a convex mirror so these two cannot be the answer at all yes or no even this is not a possible thingy not at equal distances only one correct G I got it everyone everyone who was asking for a clarification okay very good very good relax relax very good next question a point object is placed at a distance of 10 centimeter okay and it's a real image is formed at a distance of 20 centimeter from a concave mirror okay if the object is moved by 0.1 centimeter toward the mirror then the image will shift by about okay now from the very first information set we will calculate f yes or no show very good this away and toward is good away and toward is good but we have to clarify no whether 0.4 or 0.8 right relax and he gave Gupta why you can solve it here and if you're thinking like what we are discussing that's not guessing it's estimating you're estimating like you are making a strategic progress right so like even this away and toward was good strategic which like gave you 50 50 carry these two are not answers okay 0.4 0.8 okay 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 now from the first line we can calculate that f yes or no one upon f is equals to placed at a distance of 10 centimeter and it's real images formed at a distance of 20 centimeter okay so this will solve out to be quickly 20 up minus 1 minus here yes or no now for the same f 1 upon v plus 1 upon u the scenario is that if the object is moved to buy 0.1 centimeter toward the mirror so 10.1 add or subtract if or add as for subtract good so it will become minus 9.9 okay so this will shift to what if you will solve you will get you want me to solve I can solve no problem as for solve and are for not required only those who required send me as for solve good aren't very good very good so from here bit of we have to calculate v okay minus 3 by 20 plus can I write it by 10 by 99 okay good good good good good this is minus 3 okay no no zero is here please solve please solve fucking solve please solve please solve please solve please please please please please alchemy alchemy same same same same same way I am 97 why I 1 9 8 0 no now we have to get a simpler way for doing this look oh now we have to get a simpler way no not not this difficult this won't work mother this is okay to solve for a theoretical exam but not for an mcq type okay we have to think about a short ass a step short ass a step short ass a step short ass step it is saying that if the object is moved by point one centimeter toward the mirror so it will go away from the mirror so a and c can be the answer now point four or point eight that is why Gupta was saying Gupta sorry dear I did not understood you initially but there should be thought about logic thought about just if we got 20 by 3 as the focus right focal point object distance image distance proportion is not working no we'll have to calculate no other way as of now okay hello hello fine fine fine fine sorry guys next question sorry sorry we were really good running good on time then somewhere in last two questions we got distracted especially in this last question no problem no problem and here Pranav is going for a good lead Ganesh was the fastest one to respond and Pranav Pranav Pranav Pranav Pranav Pranav Pranav got it right next Next question quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, good, good, good, good, good, easy it was easy for few people, good, good, good, moderate for many of you, good, difficult, difficult, good, good, good, good, good, good, good, good, good, there is one more, okay, do not log out. If I will count till 10 and nothing happens then we will go to the next one, okay. Here we go, next, oh that's fine, that's beautiful, someone said no word, yes dear, we are exploring it, we will explore, okay, we will explore, I have someone sent a smiley, good, good, good, good, this is interesting to look at, I can conduct a, good, good, good, good, good, good, good, really nice, no racking, okay, knowledge giving, enlightening, great, really good, competitive, scientific, thank you very much, thank you very much for your time guys, thanks a lot, thanks a lot, thanks a lot, bye, bye sir, okay people still answering good.


Third-party cookies are just browser cookies like any other but they're set by a site that's different from the current top-level page. For example your site might include a third-party widget in an iFrame that sets a cookie to save preferences or maybe your site includes images from an image server you know it's run by your own company but it's on its own domain and even though you run both the website and the image server cookies from the image server across sites so they're still treated like third-party cookies. Chrome is planning to deprecate third-party cookies so you need to act now to ensure a smooth transition. I'm Sam Dutton a developer advocate with the Chrome team and in the previous video in this series I showed you how to audit your site for third-party cookie usage. In this video I'll show you how to test your site how it will perform without third-party cookies. You'll learn how to configure your browser to emulate third-party cookie deprecation and learn strategies to help you test for breakage. Now the traditional way to test how a site works without third-party cookies is simply to use browser settings to block third-party cookies. Without third-party cookies disabled you can see cross-site cookies being set for the web.dev homepage. From the network panel you'll see request cookies for cross-site assets in this case from Google.com You'll also notice warnings in the DevTools issues tab. Now I'll go to Chrome settings cookies and select block third-party cookies. So let's see what happens when I go back to the web.dev homepage and hard refresh. You'll see an eye at the right of the omnibox and when you click that you'll see if sites were blocked. From the application panel you'll still see cross-site cookies because these haven't been deleted and by the way to delete the cookies for an origin right click on the origin and select clear. If you go to the network panel now with third-party cookies blocked you won't see any cookies for cross-site requests and if you check the issues tab you won't see cross-site cookie warnings. Now just bear in mind that this is only true if the site is not attempting to set any cookies on that request. And by the way a quick and simple way to check how a site works without third-party cookies is to open it in incognito mode. As you can see here when I open web.dev in incognito mode there aren't any cookies set in the request. Now the trouble is incognito mode has a number of side effects. It doesn't just block third-party cookies. So all-in-all incognito mode can be useful but it doesn't give you a realistic site experience. Now a new way to test your site for third-party cookie breakage is to use the third-party cookie phase-out flag. And this makes Chrome behave as it will after third-party cookie deprecation. So it's ideal for testing the user experience without cross-site cookies. You set the phase-out flag from the Chrome flags page set enabled and click relaunched. And with the flag set you'll see an eye icon at the right of the omni box just like when you block third-party cookies from Chrome settings. When you click the eye icon you'll see if sites were blocked and in the network panel with the flag set you won't see any request cookies. With the third-party cookie phase-out flag you'll see an error for cross-site cookies. Cookie is blocked when set in cross-site context and that's what you'll see in the DevTools issues tab once Chrome has deprecated third-party cookies. Clicking the eye icon in the omni box allows users to temporarily re-enable third-party cookies for a site. Now let's see how that works. Click the eye icon and then click the slider to allow third-party cookies. You'll see the third-party cookies allowed message temporarily in the omni box and now if you go to the DevTools network panel you'll see cross-site cookies. Turn off third-party cookies again from the omni box and you'll see that there are no request cookies from the network panel in DevTools. Now as with other Chrome flags you can also set the phase-out flag if you run Chrome from the command line. Here I'm opening Chrome Canary with the test third-party cookie phase-out flag and just be aware that you won't see this command line flag reflected in the Chrome flags page. Now one thing you'll notice if you set the phase-out flag is that you'll still see the Chrome settings page for cookies. As the warning bar says third-party cookie blocking cannot be overridden via the settings page. As you can see even if I select allow third-party cookies from Chrome settings third-party cookies are still blocked and the DevTools network panel shows that no request cookies are sent. Once third-party cookies have been deprecated Chrome settings will no longer have a page to block third-party cookies since yeah that just wouldn't make sense. Instead of a Chrome settings cookie page there will be a new tracking protection page and you can try this out by enabling tracking protection from Chrome flags. With the tracking protection flag set you get a Chrome settings page for tracking protection instead of a page for cookies. So you've learned how to test web pages without third-party cookies. Now you need to develop a strategy to minimize site breakage once Chrome deprecates third-party cookies. Now a good first step is to understand cross-site interactions across your own sites and with third parties. You need to audit your sites to clarify what first and third-party services you're using. So now is a really good time to reduce technical debt and improve page load performance by getting rid of unnecessary tags and embeds. Next you might want to compile a list of critical user journeys and use cases across your sites. For example does embedded content such as a store finder or video widget still work on your site? Our site features such as rating or bookmarking affected to sign up and checkout flows work as expected. From this checklist of user journeys and use cases you can build a to-do list of things to fix. You could also consider working with internal teams or even trusted external testers to test your sites without third-party cookies. Ask your developer team to use your sites in Chrome with third-party cookies blocked. And once you've tested internally within your developer team you might even want to test across your entire company. To collect feedback about breakage you can provide a simple form for your staff or even install a Chrome extension to collect information. Now make sure that your deprecation experiments are integrated with test suites and QA processes and of course talk to account managers for ads and other third-party content and services. Ask third-party providers how they're planning for third-party cookie deprecation in Chrome. You can also report breakage of your own or other sites by creating an issue on the third-party cookie deprecation breakage repository. And this repository will help developers understand where users are experiencing problems and how breakage is being fixed. Once you've identified potential breakage on your sites you can begin to plan for transitioning from third-party cookies to alternative technologies. For example, for requests across your sites and services you should consider whether you can begin to use partition cookies known as chips. If you add the partitioned attribute to a cookie it will be double keyed by the origin that sets it as well as the origin of the top-level page. And partition cookies will not be blocked by third-party cookie deprecation. So you can find out more about chips from our article on developer.chrome.com. And you might also want to consider related website sets. Related website sets is a platform mechanism to help browsers understand the relationships between a collection of domains. For example, you might have sites across different country domains with multiple different brands using app service or sandbox domains. And related website sets allows you to declare domains as belonging to the same set in order to allow some limited cross-site cookie access for specific use cases. To set up a related website set you first need to provide a JSON file in the well-known directory on your websites that specifies the structure of your set. Next, you submit your set to the related website sets repo on GitHub and that repo maintains the canonical related website sets list as a publicly viewable JSON file. You can find out more about related website sets again from our guidance on developer.chrome.com. So that's how you can test for breakage on your sites once Chrome has deprecated third-party cookies. And to find out more about testing for third-party cookie breakage, take a look at the guide that accompanies this video. Our article preparing for the end of third-party cookies has everything you need to know about testing and deprecation timeframes, as well as strategies to help you transition smoothly from third-party cookies to other technologies. To understand more about cookie usage and learn how to identify third-party cookies on your site, take a look at the previous video in this series, check your site for third party cookies. So thanks for watching. And be sure to catch the other videos in our third party cookie deprecation series.


G'day, I'm Benjamin Lupton and I've been doing JavaScript for a very long time And one of the things I've realized is that at times things to me very very overwhelming Sometimes you can feel that the amount of stuff we have to keep up to date with in our industry is Always changing this always new stuff coming out and it can just make you feel like you can never keep on with it I like to propose that you can't keep up with it And that's a good thing because if you try to keep up with things Right, then you will just spend your whole time playing catch up you'll just spend your whole time learning all these different things and If your time is going towards learning these different things You're not going to have time to create something And if you don't have time to create something and you don't have time to be able to learn or really Practice the skills and get real good at them and it's important for which skills you need to practice You're going to practice the skills that are going to be deprecated in the six months But you're going to practice the skills that are going to land you a firm job in Six months are you going to learn the skills that are going to help your career path as you go forward and Most importantly as you go about learning these things Are you going to make sure you're effective in the way you learn? Are you going to be learning these things in ways that will actually matter most people will probably learn through these Tutorials and learn through okay. I've learned this technology now. What can I create with it? But perhaps what we should be asking is I've got this problem that is important to me and What technology will solve that problem technology is a tool. It's not the solution the solution is how all these things come together and That's really what we need to be focused on. We need to be focusing Not on learning everything, but on look for learning what's important. We have to be focused on Working on things that are in demand learning skills that are in demand And we have to be focused on creating something that is important to us Right something where the technology doesn't matter Right where we can have an objective opinion where we can cut out We have to focus on things that we can get stuff done today And that's talk and I hope to see you there Thanks