Hey, this is Brett the Ford guy and today we are going to check out where to get the door code on your 2017-2018-2019 and 2020 Ford super-duty trucks Now this is good for all those model years and it's going to be good for the F250 350 and presumably I think the 450 as well I have not checked but pretty sure it's the same thing. So if you watch any of my other videos I'll show you how to get this door code pretty easy And if you watch the newer body style f-150s, it's almost identical spot to those We got a 2019 Ford f-250 here today came in doesn't have the door code I'm gonna find it so everybody knows it and we don't have to hook it up to a machine So you got a kick plate right here. Just pull that open like so Next you're gonna want to take this kick plate and pull that up There's two tabs on there that you're gonna want to lift up You don't need to do any more than that. So once you get that you're gonna want to grab this right here and then that's gonna just kind of Pull this guy right like that Now you're gonna want to make sure not to break this tab off because there's a tab up there and that little That longer tab sometimes can break if you don't do it very nicely and smoothly like that So basically you'll see you can see all the tabs that are connected in there now Your door code is going to be located. There's a sticker back there and you can see it Right here. So the door code is on that sticker. It says door code on it You just grab that number and that's gonna be your door code location Thank you so much for checking out the video. It's that easy really is that easy Then you put it back together and you're all set to go But like I said, this is gonna be good for 2017 2018 2019 and 2020 Ford super-duty trucks on f-250 350's and 450's to find your door code Thanks for watching the video if you want to subscribe to our channel on the left a link to subscribe to our channel on the right a Link to more for door code locations like this one if you've not been to our website Check us out at the bottom summit auto comm. Thanks for checking out the video


I've been a desktop Linux user for about 13 years now, it's been the only operating system I've used since around 2008. And in those years, I have distro hopped many times, hundreds of times probably. And I've window manager hopped dozens of times. And I've also terminal emulator hopped dozens of times. I've always been searching for the perfect terminal emulator. So I've tried out most everything out there, all the popular choices. And one of the ones that I used for a while was termite. Termite was really the new hot terminal emulator that appeared on the scene a few years ago. I would say about five years ago it really started gaining popularity because people were looking for an alternative to, at the time, Xterm and URX-VT. Xterm and URX-VT had always been the standard terminal emulators, light, minimal, fast terminal emulators to use, especially on window manager only systems. So you didn't want to use the GNOME terminal or KDE's console because they had dependency issues and also they had performance issues compared to things like Xterm and URX-VT. Well termite came out and termite was really good. Termite looked good. It had good performance and it had a really easy config file that had a lot of options in it. It was a lot easier to configure than fooling with the X-Resources file which is how you configured both Xterm and URX-VT. So I actually ran termite for a while and it was fantastic. I really didn't have a reason to actually move off of termite. The only reason I moved off of termite was to explore some other terminal emulators and in my exploration I found Alacrity, which Alacrity has kind of become my terminal emulator. My searching now is over. I don't ever plan to move off of Alacrity because it just, it really gets everything right. It is extremely fast, you know, very good performance with Alacrity. Now it's hardware based, it does GPU acceleration. So I know some people can't use Alacrity because there are pieces of hardware out there. You know, there are computers and laptops out there that Alacrity doesn't run right on. So I know it is dependent on hardware but on all of my machines, Alacrity is fantastic. So that's why I'm using Alacrity these days rather than termite. But I still like termite. Termite though, because it gained such popularity a few years ago, termite is actually the default terminal emulator on a number of Linux distributions out there. I believe termite is actually the default terminal emulator on many of the versions of ARCO Linux. Now the problem with this is that termite now is officially dead. The maintainer of termite has made the GitHub repository read only and he's telling everybody to go and use Alacrity rather than termite. So he actually updated the readme yesterday. You can see readme and he has a comment here for the commit message is termite is dead use Alacrity and he actually made a massive edit to the readme where he explains exactly what is happening and I'll read a little bit of this. He titled this heading here, termite is obsolete by Alacrity. You should use Alacrity instead of termite. It has a keyboard based selection mode inspired by termite and Alacrity 0.8 adds a generic regex hints mode comparable to termites URL hints mode yada yada yada he's saying a lot of the cool features you like in termite. They already exist in this other terminal emulator called Alacrity. He also goes on to say that if you're using, you know, tiling window managers like i3, you know, you're looking for a good terminal emulator and you like to termite, you know, you're going to love Alacrity. He also talks about Alacrity being much faster than termite. This is the guy that maintained termite.  Alacrity just performs better than termite anyway. He talks about Alacrity being written in rust. He also talks about the fact that termite is VTE based now VTE is a terminal widget library that is maintained by the GNOME guys. It's basically the widget library that the GNOME terminal uses. So they have this VTE library and there's some APIs to it. And that's what a lot of other terminal emulators actually use VTE, including termite. But the problem that the maintainer of termite mentions is that the, you know, trying to work with some of the GNOME devs was challenging because he wanted things out of VTE that he just couldn't make work or he was asking the GNOME devs to fix certain things and they wouldn't fix certain things. Let me just read this, this third paragraph here. We strongly recommend against trying to continue the development of termite with a fork. So he's saying, don't fork it. Don't try to keep this thing alive. It goes on to say you should contribute to Alacrity instead. VTE is a terrible base for building a modern fast and safe terminal emulator. So he's talking about the VTE widget library. It's slow. It's brittle. It's difficult to improve. VTE is treated as simply being the GNOME terminal widget rather than a library truly intended to be useful to others. So he's saying, hey, the GNOME guys, they're maintaining that library, but they're maintaining it really for the GNOME terminal. They're not interested in helping anybody else that wants to use that library. And he goes on to say they've gone out of their way to keep the useful APIs private due to hostility towards implementing any kind of user interface beyond what they provide. In 2012, we submitted a tiny patch exposing the APIs needed for the keyboard selection, hence mode and other features. So he links to, I guess, this issue that he opened in 2012. This patch here. And it was rejected. And some of the things that he wanted to do with VTE, I guess they rejected. They marked it as won't fix. So this was nine years ago. Nine years ago. He's been trying to get some of this stuff done. Moving further, he goes, quote, it's now almost a decade later and no progress has been made. There's no implementation of these kinds of features in VTE. And it's unlikely they'll be provided either internally or as flexible APIs. This is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to their hostility toward other projects using VTE as a library. So he's really complaining about the GNOME project. He says GTK and most of the GNOME project are much of the same. Avoid them and don't make the mistake of thinking their libraries are meant for others to use. So that is a rather a scathing indictment about the GNOME project, which we've heard these kinds of complaints about GNOME before. We know that there's a lot of really nasty people that work on various GNOME projects. Now, I know a lot of you guys probably are using the termite terminal emulator. So what should you guys do? Well, just because the project is dead doesn't mean the terminal emulator just stops working, right? You can keep using termite. The problem is it's not going to receive any kind of bug fixes, security fixes and things like that. So you probably should be exploring other options. And honestly, if you haven't checked out Alacrity, the termite dev is right. Termite and Alacrity, they're actually rather similar as far as, you know, like the philosophy behind those terminal emulators. And I think you'll end up liking Alacrity more than you like termite. Assuming your hardware supports Alacrity because Alacrity is GPU accelerated, which means if you've got some hardware that supports Alacrity, Alacrity is going to be much faster than termite. Now, in most things you're doing in the terminal, you really can't tell the difference in speed between one terminal emulator and another.  And you can tell a big difference between termite and Alacrity on some of those kinds of performance tests. So I recommend you guys check out Alacrity. You could also check out Kitty, which is similar to Alacrity. It's GPU accelerated and it's a nice terminal emulator, but it's going to have the same problems. You know, if Alacrity doesn't work for you, chances are Kitty's not going to work for you either because both of them are GPU accelerated. So if you've got some kind of weird hardware that Alacrity and Kitty, neither one of those work on, then honestly, I would probably recommend the Suclas ST terminal, the simple terminal that is provided by Suclas. It's actually a pretty good terminal emulator. You do have to patch it a little bit for some basic functionality, but the patching isn't that difficult. And once you have ST patched, it's a pretty dang good terminal emulator. For those of you that are running Linux distributions that ship with Termite out of the box, maybe Termite's the default terminal emulator on the system. I strongly recommend you guys go tell the maintainers of your Linux distributions that Termite is dead and they probably need to start exploring other options now, you know, so that in upcoming releases of their distributions, maybe they'll move to Alacrity or some other terminal emulator that is actually being actively developed. Now, before I go, I need to thank a few special people. I need to thank Absie, Dallas, Gabe, Lou, Mitchell, Alan, Akami, Archvictor by 30 Chuck, David, the other David Dillon, Gregory Lewis, Paul, Polytech, Scott, Steven, Sven, Wes, and Willie. They are the producers of this episode without these guys. This episode you just watched about Termite being dead. It wouldn't have been possible. The show is also brought to you by each and every one of these ladies and gentlemen as well. All these names you're seeing on the screen right now. These are all my supporters over on Patreon because the DistroTube channel is sponsored by the community. I ask for your support. Look for DistroTube over on Patreon. All right, guys, peace. Rest in peace, Termite.


I just watched the movie air and on it they give like the tenets of Nike yeah I think number six or something was like um results are perfect the process will never be perfect just keep moving and I was like that's exactly it that's exactly the thing the process always sucks


With so many products being shown on screen all the time, it can be tricky to know where to start. So I thought that I would talk you through some of my top 10 must have products for beginners and the basic basics that you need in your makeup bag to create any makeup look. Also, I want to break it down a little bit because there's so many different things being thrown at you when you're a beginner. So I've broken it down into three different groups. Group number one is your moisturizer, foundation, concealer and powder. Group number two is your bronzers, blushes and lipsticks. And group number three is your mascara, brow gel and eyeshadows. So let's get started with group number one. Your first must have product is your moisturizer.  Your moisturizer gives your makeup something to hold on to even if you're using powders, you have to apply a moisturizer first to help even out the texture and give you a better long lasting finish. But I would recommend waiting about five minutes after you apply your moisturizer, just so it has time to fully absorb. And if your skin feels wet after five minutes, you're probably over applying a lot off the excess and just use less next time. Before we get into it, I want to talk a little bit about makeup and creating a blank canvas. No one has perfect skin all the time. We all have redness, breakouts. It's totally normal. Foundation and concealer is used to cover these imperfections. However, I don't like to think of it that way.  It's not always about covering. Sometimes it's about using something to cover which then enhances something else, which brings us on to must have product number two, foundation. For beginners, you'll often hear recommendations of tinted moisturizers, BB creams, CC creams, because apparently these are supposed to be easier to apply. However, that's not exactly true. BB creams tend to moisturizers, they're they're sheer and lightweight, which is why they're easy to apply. But that's only comparing them to full coverage heavy foundations. There's lots of foundations out there that are lightweight and sheer as well. And foundations are available in more tones, shades and finishes compared to BB creams and tinted moisturizers. So you're guaranteed to find the right one that's going to work perfectly for you. So the basic rule to finding the right foundation is to note these three things, texture, tone, and shade. So the texture is your skin type. And when you're picking out a foundation, it's a bit like picking out a shampoo. If you have dry hair, you go for a moisturizing shampoo, thin hair, volumizing shampoo. And it's the same with foundation. You have dry skin, illuminating foundation, oily skin, mattifying foundation. Then you have your tone, which is your undertone. This is cool, warm, neutral, olive, but people often confuse the undertone with your shade, which is from light to dark. So you want to take these three things into consideration when you're picking out a foundation and also a concealer. In order to get true coverage, it's best to use a foundation and concealer that work well together. Your foundation is there to be used on larger areas to even them out. And your concealer is then there for the smaller areas that need more coverage. Must have product number four, setting powder. Now for beginners, I would actually recommend using a press powder, but it is totally up to you. Setting powders seal everything in place. They create a uniform texture all over the skin because foundation and concealers, they can set at different rates. And setting powders create a shine free base that the rest of your powdered blushes and bronzers will easily glide over the top of. So that's group number one, moving on to group number two, bronzers, blushes, and lipsticks. So must have number five, bronzer. I want to talk real quick about the difference between contour and bronzer. Your contour is a matte shade. Always matte, a dull, shadowy like tone. And it's used in the low point to the face to emphasize the bone structure. Bronzer, however, can be satin matte or shimmer, usually more of a vibrant warmer tone. And it's used on the high points of the skin, basically where the sun would hit the face. That's where you apply bronzer. For beginners, I would actually recommend using a press powder in about one shade or more darker than your skin. That way you can use this on the high points or the low points. Perfect if you really don't know what you're doing. Must have number six, blush, and must have number seven, lipsticks go hand in hand. Sometimes it can feel impossible to figure out what shade to use. But if you pair these two together, it will make it so much easier. So here are my three tricks for picking out the perfect lipstick and the perfect blush. Match the lips.  And then you can just adjust it going brighter or lighter depending on the look that you want to create. But using your lips as your first guide, mix and match. If you have a lipstick that you love, maybe it's a bright pink, try then going for a more muted pink on your cheeks or a coral cheek, a coral lip. The only time you don't want to do this is when you're wearing red because you can kind of look like a clown. But I do a video coming up really soon on how to actually wear red. But mixing and matching your shades will help to bring the entire look together. And the last one is to match your cheeks. So run around or very lightly pinch your cheeks to see what color they go.  And there you go. Perfect shade for you. Moving on to group number three, we have mascara, which is pretty self-explanatory, though I'd love to hear what your favorite mascaras are. So definitely leave a comment. And then we have brow gel. I was thinking for beginners, brow gel is probably the easiest thing to start off with because filling in your brows can feel a little bit too much at times. Start off with a clear gel, move on to a tinted, and then you'll eventually get used to how you want your brows to look. And must have product number 10, eyeshadows. So you really only need three eyeshadows to create a look. And I talked about this last week. You need a light, you need a medium, and you need a dark. And they're kind of your basic starting points. And then you can add around those. But I would recommend for beginners to start off with neutral shades, then move on to green tones, purple tones. But start off with a nice neutral basic palette, just so you can get used to using eyeshadows. And there you go. Those are my top 10 products. Definitely let me know if there's anything I missed out, something you would swap in, or let me know what your favorites are because I love hearing from you guys. And I will see you guys in the next one.


Our shorts are actually in the most recent Olympics. Our first athlete, his name is Jackson Lebsack.  So he was filming for him and we gave him shorts. So he was always in the water in the North Shore of Hawaii and he created his own YouTube channel and blew up. So it's like the people that support the huge guys are more willing to work with us than the actual huge guys. That's such an interesting hack. It was a cool way to kind of game the system with also getting loyalty.


Hi everyone, my name is Krzysztof Bielski and I'm a product manager at Google. I'm a geek at heart since ever and my adventure of computer science started since I was five years old and I saw my older brother playing a computer game called stunts and I discovered that you can build a program so to say your own racing tracks. Since then I finished my master's of science studies at the Warsaw University of Technology, founder of startup NGO and work in the tech industry for around 13 years. I currently work as a product manager at YouTube ads team in Zurich Switzerland where I am focusing on building products for the premium advertiser experiences. If you want to have any questions, if you don't have any questions, if you just want to say hi, please find me on Twitter or LinkedIn under the following anchors. And I will present to you today a talk that is called user empathy based product design. So let's start. This is me when I was six years old and I was asked by the photographer in the kindergarten to make sure that the balloon won't fall down from my hand. As you clearly see I took this very seriously. Somehow I forgot about the main goal of this exercise which was to make a nice picture. I found this picture a good analogy to what we sometimes tend to do as product managers. We define success metrics and for products and focus so much on measuring and improving them that sometimes along the way we forget about the most important thing which is doing what's right for the users. I will present today user empathy based product design framework that I was using when switching to a new product. You can equally use it when you're starting a new job and it helped me to better understand the users, their pain points, their needs, most important their motivation. So you see this quote from Albert Einstein. If I had an hour to solve a problem I would spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and five minutes thinking about solution. As a product managers we love to find solutions. Ambiguity and lack of clarity is something we fight as part of our profession and we do have a natural tendency to jump into the solution design and brainstorming about options and that's kind of our natural tendency to spend most of our time there. That's not a bad habit per se but in particular when you're working on a new product or you're starting a new job it's actually better to spend more time on the listening. It's not your responsibility from the first day to start delivering tasks, building new products, producing things on the opposite. Your main responsibility at the beginning is to listen. Before you start designing your product spend a lot of time understanding the users, the user journeys and the pain points that they have. First thing when you start working on your product is hey, how much time can I spend to understand my users? What are the things that they're currently struggling with? What are their needs? What are they trying to achieve? And most important what is the motivation? What motivates them of doing the things that they're doing? Spend a lot of time defining the critical user journeys. Those should be used for everything from UX audits, accessibility reviews, launching or going or writing new test scenarios for user acceptance testing when you're launching a new feature. Everybody should know those and everybody should be brought into the value of those. UXR team is your best friend as a product manager. They are the experts to help you in understanding your users and to help you defining your critical user journeys if you don't have them yet. Remember that nobody expects from you as a product manager to immediately deliver solutions. First you have to understand and discover the pain points, the gaps in your products and it's actually very good to spend some time sitting on the problem space instead of immediately trying to find a solution for them. Make sure that you can put yourself into the shoes of your users and really understand what would help them to achieve their goals. I came up with this user empathy based product design framework that has seven steps and I want to walk you over those. First you have to define a list of user groups. Write them down, write their needs, write their pain points and write what would be their motivation. Second use qualitative user studies UXR to better understand how users interact with your product. Third use quantitative UXR to better understand in your products. It's the parts of functionality that you've launched but nobody's using and why is it so? What is the most frequently used use case? How many users are going over which path in your product? Those are important data to have to understand how users are in reality interacting with your product. Define core or critical user journeys for your product. This is a group exercise and you definitely want to involve the whole team into that. Form your product hypothesis, important hypothesis and not assumptions, write them down and write down how you're going to validate them. Six, introduce a confidence score for the major product deliverables before you implement it. Seven, last but not least, is measure success of your product feature by validating it with the users and ideally you want to do that by measuring CSAT or even better NETSAT which is defined as CSAT minus DSAT on a regular basis and compare the baseline values before and after launching a certain product improvement. You have to make sure that you as a team you're going to be celebrating landings which are proven impact of the launch rather than celebrating launches when you still don't know if it will bring value to the users. Let us spend some time going one by one on each of those steps understanding those a little bit better. So first you want to create a visual representation of your users and you want to make sure that you really understand the nuances between those groups and you have to make it stick. You have to involve the whole team and have the whole team understanding for whom are we actually building our product. Now this is a real life example from one of the products that we've been recently building and instead of just staying with a generic sales persona we as a team actually did put in the work in order to understand better what are the different groups. So you see there will be deal program designers accounting that our main goal is to reduce the financial risk. There will be compliance and legal that their main goal is to reduce compliance and legal risk of deal programs. There will be analysts and deal managers that will want to model the deal and track the return of investment and troubleshoot if something goes wrong. There will be sales finance that are setting up the guidance and financial terms for the deal programs making sure that everybody else afterwards is following this guidance when they're modeling a certain deal and you have market planners to manage the whole deal portfolio and to make sure that on the market level we are good. It actually does make sense to put in the work to understand the nuances and the differences between those groups and have the whole team understand for whom you're going to be building our product. Make it visual, make it detailed enough that people can understand the differences and most important make it stick meaning any presentation in your team and your partner teams should always refer to this shared understanding of the user groups and that should be the base for which we always start whenever we're discussing our product as a whole or we're discussing an idea of launching in your product feature. Second step use qualitative UXR studies to better understand how users are interacting with your product. There are a couple of points worth mentioning here. Ideas are cheap so you can have thousands of ideas but implementing all of them will be very very costly so validating hypothesis is always going to be cheaper than implementing those. That is why UXR studies and qualitative user studies can be very efficiently used to build quick prototypes on paper or mocks using modern tools like Figma and you can visually test those out with real users. Make sure that you really understand the why behind individual user wants and needs so just don't stay with the superficial knowledge of them but really make sure why do they ask the things that they ask and make sure that you go always in those UXR studies pick a good representation of your users and not over focus on one group at the cost of the other. I'm not going to be teaching you how to run UXR studies. There are better experts in that field but make sure that first of all you're going to be ending you're going to be asking open-ended questions and second of all as a product manager you should be joining those sessions as often as you can to learn daily query from the users. Now that you did your qualitative UXR studies it's also important that you're going to plan and execute on a regular basis the quantitative UXR studies. Those are the studies that help you to better understand your product in the early stages but also in the advanced stages. Those are studies that help you to discover and learn if a certain product feature that you launched is actually being used by the users. What are the most frequent paths that the users are picking? Where do they spend most of the time? Where do they get stuck most of the time? How much time overall it takes for them to finish the user journey? Is there anything we could do in order to improve that? Those are all the questions that a quantitative UXR study can help you to resolve and can help you to better understand your own product. If you have the opportunity to make sure that you hire data scientists in your team and that this person really understands the list of the users for which you're building your product the critical user journeys and the overall strategy and they will help you to design the right studies to either understand your product better at the initial phase or to make sure we validate certain ideas before implementing so that when we do launch them they're going to land really nicely. Next step is defining core critical user journeys for your product. So what is a critical user journey or even maybe even first let's answer a question of what is a user journey? So when we talk about user journeys we are referring to a series of interaction between the user and your product in order to achieve a certain goal or satisfy a certain need from a user and now a critical user journey is a user journey that is absolutely necessary. So think about it as like bringing the focus to the bare bone needs that your product. So everything that you're going to define within your critical user journeys should be later solved by the MVP minimal viable product that you're going to be building. And when you're going to be defining the critical user journeys those often represent either the paths that the majority of the users take in your product so the use cases that the majority of users are doing in your product or they can represent the most impactful for example financially wise set of use case that you built in your product. It turns out that deep diving into a critical user journey is nothing more complicated than doing a research research study or UXR. Hence my tip was that first you have to make the both qualitative and quantitative UXR and then using the results from your studies you are able together as a team to build the core critical user journeys for your product. This should be definitely a group exercise ideally all the engineering team whole UX team operations team they all should be involved in defining the critical user journeys so that at the end everybody is fully bought into but also fully understands what is the focus of our product and what is the thing that we're trying to solve. Okay so we go now to step number five which is forming a product hypothesis here first thing which I would like to spend some time on is distinguishing between assumption and hypothesis assumption is something that we assume and we don't plan nor account for verifying our assumption and that is not a good approach so we might take assumptions that are false and then build the product around it and it will be a wrong product it will be a fail because it won't deliver on the needs that the users actually had so in an ideal world we should be forming our product hypothesis first ideally we should be writing them down in a pretty formal form and we should in while forming our product hypothesis we should spend a lot of time thinking of how are we going to verify and prove if a certain hypothesis is true is valid or is invalid and ideally we should also be forming such a hypothesis write down the alternative scenarios of what's going to happen if our hypothesis turns out to be false as well as specify the amount of time we would like to take in order to verify a certain hypothesis now there is a lot to to unveil around writing precise and correct hypothesis and there'll be few books that I will recommend at the end of this talk where you can study in order to to learn more about this but if there is one thing I would like you to remember is that we should try to avoid this harsh reality where there are facts and on top of those facts we're building our hypothesis based on our awareness but we never plan to verify if they're right or wrong please make sure that whenever you're going to be stating our hypothesis there should be a sentence explicitly clarifying how are you planning to verify if a certain hypothesis is true or false by which time you are planning to do so and what is the thing you're planning to do if your hypothesis turns out to be invalid okay we go to the sixth point which is introducing a confidence score for a major product delivery base before you implement it there is a famous framework called ICE which stands for impact confidence and ease and it's a very relatively quickly and easy to do a framework where you assign a numerical value to different potential projects or product features ideas and you come up with a relative value for each of them using three basic parameters first is impact second is confidence and third is ease each of them is being evaluated against a ranking from one to ten for for each of their dimensions and those three numbers are later on multiplied and at the end we come up with the so-called ICE score so you see a simple table here on the on the left and by the way the slides are coming from Ita Markilat and his great book about it which I also recommend you to to read and you see that you have a project idea creating a community tab together by the team you can assess what will be the impact on your product or the success metrics that you define for your product then you have to define what is the confidence score meaning do you have any data actually proving that if you're going to implement this feature it's going to bring the impact that you're that you're assessing for this improvement product improvement to have and then ease of implementation how easy it is to implement it the easier it is to implement it the higher your score will be then you multiply all those things together and you end up with an IC score or ICE score this is a very simple framework and it looks like at which product features might move the needle and the key metrics being targeted confidence is certainly the one that needs the the biggest discussion among your team and there are many other different scoring models that that could be used I'm not saying this is the only one but ICE primarily is kind of it's very simple to use easy and basically gets the job done so I highly recommend it measuring success the last point measure success of your product feature by validating it with your users now Netsat or CSAT is often a secondary metric among the para teams as it is hard to prove causation between CSAT and things like net profit or incremental revenue or direct reduction of costs the most frequent pushbacks you're going to hear when proposing to setting up CSAT as the primary metric is how do I but how do I translate CSAT improvements to net profit how do I translate it to revenue increase how do I translate it to reduction of cost and the reality is it is very hard to prove that causation however using CSAT has a significant value that cannot be underestimated and it is the value of listening understanding and caring about your users I strongly believe in the following two hypotheses for the B2C products if your users are happy and satisfied they will be peaking your product over the other authorities available on the market and for the B2B products if your users are happy and satisfied they will be working more productive and that was in fact proven by many research studies which you can link in the description of this talk what I really wanted to say with this point is that you have you should have a central dashboard that is measuring CSAT and this is a dashboard that you should be looking at on a regular basis on a weekly basis with the whole team definitely you should be looking at this metric like before and after launching a certain product improvement and feature because this is the best way to quantify and to see if what you plan to launch for the users actually land it well and users actually appreciate the things that you're building perfectly those are a few takeaways that I would like you to take out from this talk before you design your products spend a lot of time understanding the user journeys the pain points their motivation their motivation their motivation pain points their motivation and how do they interact with your product use quantitative user studies to better understand your product in the early stages of your product design form your product hypothesis and use qualitative user studies or quick prototypes to validate those introduce a confidence score for major product deliverers before you implement them last and not least is make CSAT or even better NETSAT which is defined as CSAT minus DSAT as the first citizen metric for your product those are a few recommended books that I used in order to inspire myself to create this talk Marty Keegan inspired a book that I don't have to promote more and because everybody in product management board knows it already Ryan Singer shape up great book that allows you to know how to ship things and how to ship work that really matters ice prioritization done right by Ita Mark a lot goes quite deeply on the framework that we mentioned today and it's a very easy but very powerful framework that you can use in order to prioritize product features and the lean product playbook by Dan Olson is also a very highly recommend it's it thank you for your attention thank you for your time and looking forward to our future sessions thanks bye


Well, you know this whole thing about cancel culture and it's a really big thing where people can just cancel you, right? No. Yeah, you know who the latest victim of it is and this is gonna break your heart. This is gonna make you really, really sad. What? That great musician, John Hinckley Jr. Who? John Hinckley Jr. He is a victim of cancel culture. People are refusing to come to his concerts. You know who John Hinckley Jr. is? No.   People aren't coming to his folk music shows. I'm just upset he didn't actually assassinate Ronald Reagan. Josh! Hey, welcome back to our TVNRX, of course.  You can follow us on Instagram, Twitter, for our juicy content. They get our social page. Follow us on Instagram, like, button. Not a fan of that, president. Today we got a trailer from a 2021 Tamil language political satire film. Called... Okay, Mandela, like about Nelson.  No, is it? I don't know. Mandela is a 2021 Indian Tamil language political satire film written and directed by Madan Ashwin on his directorial debut starring Yogi Babu. The score in songs is composed by Bharat Sankar, also the composer of Mahaviran. Also the director of Mahaviran. And also, yeah, the director of Mahaviran. The film received critical acclaim, won two national awards including Best debut film of a director and Best screenplayed dialogue. Nice. I find it so interesting that screenplays in India are divvied up. Story and dialogue, because... Even a nil. Yeah, it's a tool. Yeah, they're differentiated. Here they're not because a screenplay is both story and dialogue. It's just one and the same, but many people just come up with a story and then you have to create the conversations inside. So here we go. Yeah. Mic on. We're going to hear from Thalini from the audience. What will you do if you win? I'll give a party to the boys. They wanted to get angry, so I'll take them with me. Hey, he didn't ask me what to do. What? What do you mean? I'm a journalist, and I'm going to put Rs. 12,000 in all the accounts.   And then I'm going to act. We're 340. He's also 340. We'll both be dead. There's only one vote to win.  There's a way. There's a way. It's not a big deal. It's not a big deal. It's enough. Enough? I'm the one who won the election. I'm the one who won the lottery. Who are you going to vote for? I'm not going to vote for anyone. Brother, why are you staring at me like that? Who are you going to vote for? Whatever you do, I'll do it. You tell me. How much do you want to vote for? Rs. 10,000. He's going to vote for Rs. 1,000,000. I'm going to give you half of my money. You don't even know the party. He's going to vote for us only because we've done this. I'm going to vote for you only because we've done this. Who are you going to vote for? I'm going to vote for Mandela. I'm going to vote for Saloon. What? Are you going to vote for any other party? No. Why? How do I believe that you're going to vote for India? I'm going to vote for America. I'm going to vote for India. Believe me. The guy maybe from the rookie, what's his name? Quaid. Yeah, or somebody in the role. They needed this one. I never saw it, but they needed one. I don't know that. I don't know if it's like a remake or anything, obviously, but the premise rings familiar. It looks cool. It looks very cute. It could be a fun film. Yogi Babu. It looks like the humor is a lot of fun. It looks like it won some critical acclaim. Mandela. I wonder if it has anything to do with the Mandela effect being his name. I don't look like it. I think it's just, it's a name. No, it's Mandela effect. No. By the director of Mavitan. So if you know, if you've seen our watch line of Mavitan, love that movie. We really like that. 40. Almost two and a half hours. Dumbled film. Yeah, so you guys can let us know if this is one that would be worth a watch for us. Always down to see a Yogi Babu star vehicle. He's usually this funny supporting guy with Roshan Khan. In the ton of Mali Alam films. I'm kidding. He's never been in a Mali Alam film. We just, for some reason. I constantly, we just jokingly say, end with Yogi Babu. Yeah. It looks really good though. You guys let us know how the film is. If it's one that's worth a watch and if not, what should be the next film that we watch? Let us know down below.


We're still on with the touchline on Y2 Fava, very good afternoon and welcome back to the program. My name is Max Olwasika. Time for the fan favorite segment, the Fan Zone, where we're giving a focus on international football with regards to what has been trending, the matters, transfers and of course what is coming up next. When is the pulsating clash, of course beating Chelsea football club against their rivals, as far as English Premier League is concerned, Arsenal in Europa League, football and of course Arsenal looking forward probably to beat Chelsea to qualify for UEFA Champions League football camp next season and leave United to be one of the top clubs in England to play Thursday night football. Of course joining me is a great panelist to dissect and give their opinion with regards to several headlines as far as matters global soccer is concerned. Ian Wagat the social nerd has been here, Ian, have you been? I'm good, I'm good, man. Better late than never, right? Yes, I'm happy to be here. Moses Gowi, big man. Yes, Vux. It's been a minute. It's good to be back to commentate on matters football. You know football is our home ground, so any opportunity to talk football is a welcome opportunity. Definitely Los Oro Robots. You were not here before man. What happened to you? Oh man, it's those days when journalists failed to work man, the matter had run. Yesterday people were tweeting about it and I forgot that I live on the road where it's closed. Traffic snarlap. Traffic snarlap and I don't have a car. Next time I'm going to come to rescue bro. Straight into what has happened, your former coach Antonio Conte is off to Inter Milan. Big move for the Italian giants. Yes, definitely. It's a huge move for Inter Milan and I think it's a move that will benefit the club especially at this time when they are rebuilding. We all know the quality Antonio Conte possesses in his two seasons in England. He won a Premier League title and an FA Cup title. So he's a very good coach. I'm actually looking forward to Inter Milan performing very well. Maybe they will start challenging you for the Italian Serie A. Mosa several clubs are managerless and so are managers who are clubless. Of course I speak right now, Jose Mourinho is an attached, Max Allegri is an attached. Several transfer rumas linking these coaches to various clubs. What do you make of the rumamil so far? Obviously the rumamil now is as far as the coaches are concerned. They are mostly linked to Syria clubs. Conte just joined Inter Milan to study the ship while at Juventus the previous season they had finished seventh. Conte came in on the league. The same thing at Chelsea, they performed very poorly, came in on the league. So next season we expect a very tough Syria as far as the available coaches are concerned. People tend to link Mourinho with the position at Juventus given that Max Allegri has left. And if you think of it, the only viable option is Mourinho most obviously because of his European pre-degree. Allegri won five back-to-back titles. To chase him away from that job means that Juventus have the eye on the big cup that is the Champions League. And Mourinho is a serial winner in this competition. It's only logical that Mourinho be given the nod for this available position. Other coaches who are available, I don't see anyone of the class to fill the position at Juventus other than Jose Mourinho. And maybe if Pochettino becomes available, which I don't think Spaz will be willing to let him go. I know you have followed the Italian football for quite long. And you remember those days of AC Milan and Inter Milan, San Siro rivalry. And their standards have drastically dwindled. It's now Juventus who are making headlines, winning Syria titles consecutively. They have won it I think several, a few years down the line winning it. Eight years running. Do you think Conte joining Italian football would now restore the lost glory of Inter Milan? A team that, you know, our very own McDonald Mariga played for one champion, sleep with them. It's a big class for Inter Milan because you look at the history of Antonio Conte in Italy. Because when he joined Juventus they were actually coming off relegation and they were trying to rebuild and do everything that they could. And Antonio Conte came and helped them rebuild and everything that they had to do. But then again he was called for the Italian job. So he had to leave Juventus, come to Italy for two years and then come to Chelsea. So him going back to Inter Milan, as Ian said, he is the most capable coach who is likely to challenge Juventus at their level best which they are. Because other coaches who have managed to challenge Juventus have not got that far because you realize the next best coach who challenged Juventus was Mauricio Sarri when he was at Napoli. It came, it was 91 points with Napoli twice he was running, the second runner up not getting to the level where Juventus was. So I think Antonio Conte coming there is a big plus. But then again the director of football, I think Spalletti, who was the director of football at Juventus was the one who brought Antonio Conte to Juventus. He is the one currently at Inter Milan and I think he knows that the quality of Antonio Conte when he goes to Inter Milan and what he can do. The thing is Inter Milan has to go ahead and start to bang players when the calibre to compete with Juventus. Because European Juventus bang the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo, Diabala, Kulibali. The calibre of players that Juventus has is not the calibre of players that Inter Milan has to invest in the good players that Antonio Conte can use to challenge Juventus. And of course as far as matters Italian football is concerned Cristiano Ronaldo won play of the season just a few months after leaving Los Blancos of Real Madrid to join Juventus. Do you think that is the man that Italian football would require if that competition and quality. I think for everyone I don't even think it was a surprise that Ronaldo was the best Syria player I mean he is arguably the best footballer, one of the best footballers ever to play the game. So my only problem with Juve is I felt like Juve really let him down in the champions league because him himself he gave everything he had. He scored very huge goals he brought them to the semi-finals. So the final one against Atlético Madrid that was a big plus centre. Yes, yes. And even in the quarterfinals when all was lost he came in with a heart-trick performance to send Juve to the semi-finals. So my problem is there's something wrong with Juve. At some point they just don't execute. And I think it's not, they have very good players but I don't think they are clutch players. I don't think they are players other than Ronaldo where in a big game you can call up to them. And that's why you are seeing Debales being linked with the move away from Juventus. Because easily the player we thought he is because in the big stage he has failed to deliver. So I think Juve is a very good team but they need other players who will be able to come in when Ronaldo has an off day. Another player will be able to come in and execute. Most I don't know whether you read from the same script with the social nut because when he says that there are no quality and probably world class players at the touring. What do we refer to people like Kielini who have been phenomenal for the club? What do you think Juve went wrong that led to the elimination from Champions League football? And what has been their main and doing? Is it the coach marks a leg room they have parted ways with or probably jail and blame? I think Juve have top quality players all round. If you look at their defense it's one of the main defense in the top five European competitions. Jojo Kielini, Debales, Blaise Matuidi, Miro Lempiani. Those are top players who would fit into any other team. But the success has eluded them in the European competitions. Twice they have managed to reach the finals. They went out against Barcelona and Real Madrid, both Spanish teams. The other season they were unfairly knocked out against Real Madrid when they considered a late penalty that was converted by Ronaldo who is at Juve right now. So Juventas, I think perhaps what they are liking is someone to steer them to the Champions League. The players are there because you can't doubt the quality of players that they have. Probably the players, they are the best players in the Italian league and they fit into most of these Premier League teams even in Bayern or PSG. So let's see what the next coach comes and does. This time round Ajax was there and doing. Ajax had a very good team spirit. They had a very good run in the Champions League and they beat the big teams so to speak. Real Madrid fall to them, Juventas fell to them. So I don't think the blame is on the players or the lack of quality. I think it's something else. It's like the case with PSG. They are used to winning in Italian football. But when it comes to the Champions League it's a different competition. The teams that we are going to meet are totally different from the way you are playing. You might have the best players in Serie A, the best players in the world, you are winning in your league. But remember when you come to the Champions League it's 13 games to that trophy. It's not 30 games. So a team like Ajax that came this time round and surprised everyone. They know that we are going to every game in 180 minutes. You either knock us out or we knock you out. I think the players, I think they come into a comfortable zone. We are the best of the best. We can take you on. But you get a team like Manchester United which has been struggling. But the moment they know they are facing Juve in the Champions League they know these are do or die. The perfect example of what you are saying is the Barcelona and Liverpool games. Because it is, as you said, the Champions League a game is 180 minutes. So the first half was done. So it was just up to the coach because everyone would agree with me that if it was Mourinho who had a 3-0 lead the tie is over. So at that point we have to blame the coach because Real Madrid went to Ajax. They scored and away it goes. How did they set up in the second leg? No, we still want to steal all of it. But we forget the Champions League is very tactical because of its nature being 180 minutes. It's very tactical. You may not have to play the best football but you might win the game purely on tactics. But you see, I think yesterday Manchester United was celebrating 20 years of winning the treble. But one of the biggest goals that came out of that was the coaches work ends at the touch line. Which kind of players are making this team now work as a team in the game itself? Which kind of players are rising up to work at this? Giventas Afbonuchi have gelin in defence. Good for you. You come to a midfielder, you have Diabala. And you have Mathuidi in that midfielder. You have Manzukic, you have Cristiano Ronaldo. Then why are you not scoring the goals? How do you set up? What do you want to achieve? So for me it's tactical because if I have a one-one draw away, my only thinking would be let me not concede this game. Let me flood the midfield. I'm going through anyway. So let me have more midfield players. Let me sacrifice Diabala and have Ronaldo play up front. So for what they went for, they went for a win. And it really backfired on them. We're going to speak about something else. Asaga that has elicited heated reactions from African football followers, the leading record scorer for Ghana black stars, five-time African champions, Asamo Ajian. He had announced retirement from football, especially after he was stripped of captaincy. And later on he met the president at the state house and he recended his decision, he came back to football. And now as we speak right now, Moses, he is the general captain, while Jordan Ayu is the captain. Do you think that is the state of a revolt ahead of the continental shop is in Egypt? Because why do you have someone being given the position that is non-existent in football circles? We obviously can't ignore the importance of Asamo Ajian to the Ghanaian team. It's the overall leading gold scorer. It's the overall leading. I mean we can't argue against the statistics. Asamo Ajian is the leading gold scorer in Ghana. He's passed his best. So the server obviously it brings discord in the team. It interferes with the team unity and with the team jelling together. Andrei is a deserving captain. He's contributed as much as Asamo has contributed to the Ghanaian team. But now that politics mixed with football, the president had to intervene and now you see the coach, the coach's hand is tight. If you appear, question appear, what will you do? The president himself has intervened. Say Uru Kenyata intervenes today. Call Bako here. You answer tight practically. Why do we have to decide? Would that attract sanctions from the government to intervene politically? No, no, no. It is about giving their own opinion and everything. But look at this. Asamo Ajian's statistical, as you have said, is one of the best African players and for Ghana players. But the moment he lost that penalty in 2010, all the statistics went down. Same case with Roboto Bagge. The best strike at the world has ever seen from Italy. But the moment, what do people remember? It's penalty loss against Brazil in the 94 World Cup in the U.S. That's the whole thing. But in penalty taking, we say it's exceptional. It's just that the government and the federation are bruising his ego. They're just making him look good and everything. But it's past his prime. This guy left playing for Sunderland to go and play in Abu Dhabi. Now, because this is the African Cup of Nations, he just wants to come and say that he's the king of African Cup of Nations. But that thing is going to be bruised. The way you said it, it's just going to divide that team two parts. There's going to be, and as a more camp, there's going to be, Andre and Kwado come. I know of the continental shop, it's African Cup of Nations. It's kicking off in a few days from now as we speak in Egypt. Ghana has been among the favourites for the title. Of course there are the four African Cup of Nations champions and they have dominated the African football headlines. Do you think heading into the showpiece and with what is happening, it will undermine their performance on the pitch? First of all, I have to say that Ghana, this is a very different Ghana side. We are not talking of the real Ghana players we had back then. Because even when you watch their performance against Arambi stars, that was not a good performance at all. I honestly don't think they are even favourites to win this showpiece. Of course Senegal is clear favourites to win this year's AFKON. So I think even without the saga for Asamoa Jan, I don't think they are going anywhere really. They have good players, but I don't see them clinching the AFKON title. For the African showpiece, for me I am going with the Maghreb region. That is either Morocco, Algeria or Egypt. Those are the teams that Senegal can try because of their European influence and everything that they are going to have. But you look even yesterday, the Africa Cup Champions League final is between Moroccan clubs. These are players who understand African football playing in the African continent. So the moment they are going for the Africa Cup of Nations, they know what they want and they know how to play in this terrain. Senegal can try because of their performance at the World Cup, but the Africa Cup of Nations is different. You look at Egypt, they perform well in Africa. They go to the World Cup, they fail. And this time we can write them off, but when it comes to the Africa Cup of Nations, it's a team you cannot write off. Mosa's big game coming up on Monday, that's the championship play of final beating, John Theriant, Frank Lampard, that's Aston Villa against Derby County. What do you make of the build up to the clash? Of course, several people have spoken to probably are looking forward to a team of Leeds United joining English Premier League to revive that rivalry, especially with the teams like Man United. But it never came to pass. But Aston Villa, Derby County, you expected that? I didn't expect that. As you said, Leeds, it will have been quite a story for Leeds United to make it back to the Premier League. Of course, Marcelo Pielsa is a very exceptional coach and what is done as Leeds is visible to see. But then again, Derby County have been knocking on the Premier League door for quite some time now. They have been eliminated at the knockout stages for, I think, a better part of the past three or four seasons. This time round they've made it to the final against Villa Villa, a seasoned Premier League team. They know how to do it, of course. The story there is the rivalry between John Theriant, Foma, Chelsea captain and Frank Lampard on this other side, Derby coach. Both English internationals, both Chelsea teammates very influential during their play days. But then again, this is one match that will be decided in 90 minutes so I clearly can't call that. I'm for Derby to go through myself and it will be quite a story for them to finally make it to the Premier League. Of course, the financial stakes are also very high. Yes. It's a tune of, I think, £190 million and that's quite some good money going into the Premier League. If you win the championship. Yes, if you win the game. It's quite ironic because the win of the championship hans much even than the overall win of the Premier League. Yes. It's the richest game in football as they call it. Yes. So... Why is that? I didn't know that. Yes. They call it. So you have to... Monday night football. It's a nice championship but I think the TV sponsorship money that comes with it boosted it. I was watching the sky this morning and I saw the trajectory of that from 2013 to now it's really skyrocketed the amount that players the teams that win the sun. I think it was £90 million in 2013. Now it's £190 million. So every year it goes up and I think it's because of... The broadcast rights. Yes, because of the broadcast rights. Yes, but you also even see the quality of players that come out of the championship. Yes. Teams are really competing with Premier League teams for players. So there's a lot of man in the championship. Of course the growth in the Premier League will automatically mean the championship will also grow as fast. Are you talking about Dave? Somebody called James Wumman, United East. Chasing after from Swansi. The same way Robatson left the championship to Liverpool and he's one of the left-backs. Best left-back as I speak right now in the world. I don't think we have enough time to discuss Manchester United. Manchester United's problems. I don't think we have enough time. Osora, but what do you have to say in regards to your chase for Champions League players? Man, I'm a journalist. I don't support any club. Don't they defend me? Live TV. Alright, away from that. Next Wednesday also a big game will be happening against Arsenal. What do you make of the stakes? I think the biggest conversation that has come out of that one is that the best democracies in the world still have problems that Henryk Mekitarian will not be travelling to Baku to play in that Europa League final and it would have been good for Mekitarian to play in another final because he won it in 2017 with Manchester United. You have another chance to play with Arsenal. You can go ahead and win it. But I think it is going to be a very, very good game. Mekitarian, Chelsea might be giving good bye to Eden Hazard but it's a game I cannot predict because this season there has been two wins, the Premier League, Arsenal wins, Chelsea wins so it will be a tough and good game to watch. I've seen several people especially alone on Twitter, football followers attributing Mekitarian's predicaments to UEFA for their lack of putting in place concrete security measures. Do you think it's their blame, really? Of course, UEFA is to blame absolutely. They know the situation in Armenia. If you're going to stage football for everyone and if you're going to stage a competition where people are expected to attend that country has to be friendly enough for everyone to be able to attend that much. So in this case if you are of Armenian descent they deny you passports. Of course the embassy, the Armenian UK and the Azerbaijan embassy in the UK, they say Mekitarian can go but then what security are you guaranteeing him? We've seen a lot of pitch invasions recently where players are attacked on the pitch and given the relationship between the two countries I think you have really had there. If you're going to stage a competition that is all inclusive you have to be able to accept anyone to come in. Because it's not only the players who are in trouble even the fans who are having problems. Objectively speaking this football body scarf Fifa, are they eligible enough to intervene in the political tension related activities? Yes. My biggest concern is definitely there's a lot of politics in football and you saw even when the FIFA scandal happened and the amount of payments people have been taking to and right now I think there is even an investigation for the other investigation for the Qatar World Cup claiming some money was exchanged for people to host and I think that is what is messing football up. There's so much money being taken and it's largely just corruption. On politics sports transcends everything. Sports transcends politics it transcends everything and everything. You saw I think it was in the Munich in 68 where we had the black armor in sports and you can see even up to today when you do a nazi salute it becomes a problem in sports but then again all these federations like they have their motto like the Olympic motto the football motto and everything. You need to get a sport into a conducive environment that it can transcend and communicate against everything. Right now what the UFO did with staging the UFO in Baku was actually tell people that we still have got ethnic tensions in Eastern Europe in most of these European countries which were formerly colonized by the former Soviet Union. So you realize that up to the moment the problems of the Soviet Union divide and conquer in Soviet Union is still traveling up to today. So the good thing is the world has known that these European democracies that everybody says that are good or that they are better off and everything is good with them those democracies have problems and now for football it's a plus for them because they have ignited that conversation but for the player and the fan you have made them not to go and enjoy the game the way it's supposed to enjoy it. And again I think football always has a responsibility to challenge inequality and discrimination when you see Rahim Staling standing up against racism because of the platform he has because of football he can talk about these things and people can listen and it's the same conversation that has come to the fore with the situation between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the sort of relationship between countries we see Palestinian players in the Israel League so these are some of the things that should stand up to challenge inequalities and discrimination that still assist in the game because as we say the beautiful game has done a lot to unify us whenever there are tensions even during political campaigns people organize food marches people come together it's a symbol of unity that has happened in South Africa during Apartheid so football always has that role in this issues Fair enough a lot of Kenyans looked forward to 2022 World Cup in Qatar having 48 teams probably to boost Kenyan chances of making it through but now it's not happening because the two countries as confirmed would be participating I think the current FIFA president Gennio Infatino has been taken off by wanting more money in their pockets that's why they are spoiling the World Cup 32 teams is the cream they are cream of football 48 teams is getting teams that are mediocre to go to the World Cup the same thing that is happening in the Africa Cup of Nations we are having 24 teams teams are getting into the Africa Cup of Nations without the quality of them getting into the Africa Cup of Nations 16 was good enough the best of the best of African football competes at the grand stage of them all now we are in 24 the moment the World Cup say that 48 teams come here in Africa started saying we can even have a 32 team Africa Cup of Nations we are getting teams like Kenya going into the Africa Cup of Nations yet without the quality to play in the Africa Cup of Nations so let it be 32 when you start seeing 48 prove to us that the 48 teams that you are bringing to the World Cup deserve to be in the World Cup but even as you speak about the World Cup witness as situation where several heavyweights didn't qualify like Netherlands the Oranges so which means probably 48 will have given an opportunity to no no no no most of the giants making it true at 32 we know if Netherlands they don't make it to the best of 32 then you are making good enough competitive made it to the World Cup when you expand the number of teams in these competitions obviously you deliver the quality of football how many matches will you watch in a 48 team World Cup that have become to expect for the World Cup this is a global competition that we are associated with beautiful football we don't want to watch Kenya Basmaligia again it's easy in the World Cup the 48 team perspective in Qatar has not gone through because of tensions between these Middle Eastern countries you remember the 48 proposal by Infatino the FIFA Congress was it will be hosted in different countries then the final comes on to one country so like in the 2026 World Cup which is I think in the US, Canada and Mexico so we are going to have three countries hosting one show piece that's like one northern region in America that is going to host the World Cup so before we get into the local schedule of the 16 team it's more of a league format for you to get into the best 16 so it's a month of a circus of football but the best of the two teams is just goes to one team, you go to Germany you realize that you put your best eight groups the best two are going to call for to the last 16 but you are going to give us a league format of the game come back you are going to do all that and you are seeing even the confusion with the UEFA Nations League I mean people don't even understand what's going on and right now all this is because of money all this is because of money FIFA wants more money and the only thing they know how to get this money is bring on more teams so that TVs can come in sponsors can come in for a very long time and make money because FIFA at the moment the most money they make is from the sponsorship deals that they have and the TV revenues that they have and the get collections let's wind up with the transfers I saw you were very happy when Thorgan Hazard finally moved to Borussia Dortmund alongside Julian Brand so far which are the transfer moves impressed you first of all as a fan of Borussia Dortmund as I'm sure many football fans are them handling their business are very early in the transfer window is good we've seen Thorgan Hazard joined them and Niko Sholes have joined them Julian Brandt have joined them so it's a very good move considering that we are tired of seeing Niko Sholes in the Bundesliga so we think this time with the amount of reinforcements that are coming in we hope that definitely we will see Borussia at the top with other transfers in mind as a Chelsea fan I would like to state very clearly that we don't want Felipe Coutinho we don't want him we don't want him I think man united can take him we don't want that guy man united have been laid with almost everyone Garret Del Felipe Coutinho Anton Griezmann this particular morning Sky Sports reported about that particular move I think Manchester United with Minora is using Manchester to sell players that's why you hear that Griezmann is being linked to united then Barcelona taking at a higher price I'm paying the players price tag when it's linked to Manchester United this value will go up but at the moment I like the way Manchester is doing their business they are going for raw and top talent but right now you need proven and experienced players proven and experienced that's failed united you got what Pogba is doing I failed to understand united supporters supporters frustration with Paul Pogba Paul Pogba is the best player in terms of goals contribution on the pitch and now you have to chase him away again because you are not performing to the level best that united wants you to perform but Paul Pogba is not a goal scoring midfielder what else can Pogba do you have to see he has the most goals you are scapegoating Pogba your English players first of all are very it's not only Pogba has not been performed actually Young was also told but Pogba is mostly Pogba Phil Jones is because he is the standout player there is no day you will compare but he is standing out he is standing out united players play with attitude and you turn out for every game Pogba does not turn out for every game that's why most Manchester United supporters are of the question how come the player that stands out in every game is going a player that stands out is staying just because the coach wants to build the team around so first of all if we remove Pogba's goals and assists I think united are like 13th or 14th let them stay there get the best players to get you out of that so as a united supporter who will you want to sign you got it now you see those other mediocre players who will try to come to united these guys are excited as a united supporter probably who do you prefer given that asero stated we have around 40 billion living in this market so I think first of all the best options will go for free transfer and there are very quality players available we have Adrien Rabil with his situation at PSG he is available for free I doubt whether he will be willing to come to Asenok given the quality that he has we have players like Yasin, Brahimi or Porto very decent players we have other players like Umtiti Barcelona situation is unsure Rafal Baran is also living I am not sure about the situation around Baran probably he will stay with us in Adrien I saw some issues around Sejuramos wanting to live we will welcome Sejuramos for me it is a very experienced defender and be able to really show up that Asenok defense that is really leaky for me my shopping list of course will have Nikolaas paper we have been dealing with him I wouldn't mind the late but I know chances are he won't come to the bridge he has not been mentioned that any rumors in the bridge still in Barcelona mostly Nikolaas paper adlab Ayovic in there because we are kind of rebuilding we need a center forward we just tied down Jirud to another deal we tied down David Luis We've tied down really come back. Alright gentlemen, it's been a fantastic show this particular Saturday and chilly afternoon. Tathline has been the show in Y-2-5-4. My name is Mark. So we're sick alongside Robert Osor and gentlemen, Ian Wathard. Alongside Moses Goy, we're joining us for the fan favorite segment. The fans on today's cycle above matters in the national football and give their perspective on this with regards to what is trending. Let's again do this next Saturday, same time, same place to our super crew for doing an amazing job, bless. And of course, let's head to RFU grounds for the Enterprise Cup Finale Kabras right before the club against Impala Sarasens. Then tonight, Barcelona against Valencia in Copa del Rey final. Enjoy and have a fantastic weekend, bless.


Hi, thank you for coming during the happy hour. I'm Prasad Vallanki, CEO of OneConvergence. We're a startup based in California, in Santa Clara, California. What we are demoing and talking about is our network virtualization and service delivery platform. This is a software solution which plugs into OpenStack. And it allows arbitrary networks to be created as a neutron plugin. And on top of it, we also do what we call network services. And particularly, where we're innovating is around network services and the creation and the chaining thereof. So if I look at it, our solution is a network and service controller. And we have a plugin into Neutron. And it works on existing Edge switches, OVS. So we don't write our own kernel modules or any of that. We work on existing software, including the OVS V-switches or overlay any of the demons which are existing in the Linux area. What we work on is existing infrastructure of the top of the rack switches. So we don't make any assumptions of anything in the networking. What we do is we separate the problem into two areas. There is a network virtualization and what we call the service virtualization. In the network virtualization, we do the creation of overlay networks. And that is basically using existing any of the overlay protocols such as VXLAN, NVGRE, or in future, any of these ethernet or MPLS coming to foreplay. However, and that allows us to create what we call the multi-tenant domains for networks. But where we are looking at going a lot more is in the service area. So while we allow arbitrary topology networks to be created, we are trying to provide where services can be inserted, arbitrary services can be inserted and chained. And in a fashion where we're creating a service overlay network on the network overlay. So as services get chained, it becomes a lot more difficult to chain, I mean, to basically create this service overlay to have network traffic to be engineered from one service to other service. In looking at the problem, we're also looking at how we kind of make it distributed. So in some cases, where the not-so traffic can be arbitrarily taken into east-west traffic, we basically distribute that. And one of the areas where in terms of we are trying to get the cloud technologies into it is where we can do elastic scale out. So depending on the load or a CPU or the resource usage of a particular service, how do you scale out? And while in an inserted, and if you have multiple services inserted, the challenge, how do you kind of engineer the traffic and also scale out? So we are innovating quite a bit on that area while we're providing the whole overlay networks. Our solution completely goes into OpenStack. We are completely dependent on the OVSV switches and the existing whatever protocol. So we are not creating, as I said before, we are very much a standard-based approach we're taking. So one of the things I want to showcase over here is actually two showcases. One is inserting multiple services into a network. And then while inserting, there will be change from a router to firewall. And the other part is the whole scaling nature of these services. So let me switch to a. So I mean, I've been having a lot of problems with wireless here, so hopefully everything will work out pretty good. So what I'm showcasing here is our dashboard. The dashboard is basically, it is inserted into as a horizon right now, though it can also support independent UI. So right now it goes into horizon as a tab. And it gives you the overview of the network. And then in what we show here is we can go to the tenants. And what I'm going to show here is the creation of this particular network, which is, yeah. So here what I'm showing is a firewall and a router being inserted into a network. And then it's inserted to a template. We follow templates which are being as supported by the Open Stack. We use AWS as our format, AWS format. And then we create these templates where you can start the template, and then the whole network will be inserted. The whole topology will be created. And on top of it, the service will be inserted into the router. So I'm hoping that this will work based on our network here. So these are the various templates we can support. And we can extend it. And people can create their own custom templates. Here what I'm showing is this firewall service, which I showed the topology being created. So again, I'm hoping that our network will cooperate. And we are logging into our data center in California over VPN. So this is where we are having, all day I've been having problems. OK, so there you go. So some of the firewall, here the firewall services are getting created. And the create is in progress. While that is in progress, I'll show something else over here. So the next part of the demo, what I'm trying to show is this whole elastic nature of our load balancer, where as service gets inserted based on some traffic generation, both in terms of the resource and traffic, we scale out the services, and sort of thing. So here, I've already created, this is the template which we pre-created. And here what I'm inserting is a Nginx web application firewall. And our technology is independent of what services are getting inserted. So we take a type of service and insert them, and then chain them and scale out. So here, I'm just taking a bare Nginx load balancer. It could be, and we're working with several partners where the existing appliances can be inserted into the networks. So this is just one of it. Over here, so if you look at it, this service is running. So this is basically the traffic pattern. I mean, where the instances agree, what happened is we've been running a traffic pattern inside our data center. And as traffic increases, or changes pattern, various instances get created. And then they scale up and scale down based on the traffic. And you can see here, this traffic pattern, you can see the auto scaling where there are instances which are going up and down. You can see the number of instances are 1, 2, 3, 4.  And the traffic on the port is demonstrated here. And this is the traffic pattern. You can see that varying of a traffic pattern, which is varying over time. And this traffic pattern can be reflected on the instance creation. And similarly, there is also this port. Similarly, the number of ports which are getting allocated in the network is also following the same pattern as the services. So what we're doing here is basically as we are monitoring the resource usage at the network, at the service level using the CPU and the memory. And with that, we are calculating what needs to be done in terms of scaling and adding those services into the thing. So overall, what we are providing is a technology where you can insert arbitrary services, chain them together, and then you can scale them based on the various parameters which today we are looking at that network traffic, which also can be customized to something else later. All this, of course, is available in terms of in our booth. Basically, we can run through the whole demo at our booth. We are welcome to visit our booth and come by. And the other thing we are trying to also, we are right now, we are in a semi-stealth mode and there's a company. Our product is not released yet. We're working with a few prototypical customers where we are going to work with them to make it more robust and also validate a lot of what we are doing. And in a few months, we would be releasing the product. So that's where the status of our company and our product is. So that's all I had in terms of the demo and what we want to show today. We welcome to our booth and I just want to showcase what we have and what we want to show. Thank you very much for coming by.