Which case was settled in court first Eisenstadt v. Baird or Baze v. Rees ?
6bd886eb7dd5c777257f8295b7904af3
Eisenstadt v. Baird Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972) , is a United States Supreme Court case that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples.
f15166069bda0b9063c02667f457e1c3
Baze v. Rees Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008) , is a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which upheld the constitutionality of a particular method of lethal injection used for capital punishment.
c780285138c432c6202a86b55d4aa3f9
Taylor v. Standard Gas &amp; Electric Co. Taylor v. Standard Gas and Electric Company, 306 U.S. 307 (1939) , was an important United States Supreme Court case in United States corporate law that laid down the "Deep Rock doctrine" as a rule of bankruptcy and corporate law. This holds that claims, as creditors, upon an insolvent subsidiary company by controlling shareholders or other insiders, like managers or directors, will be subordinated to the claims of all other creditors.
01f58506a7953de1a0afabd248b4a6f3
Powell v Moody Powell v Moody is English case law, often used for the settlement of civil claims brought as the result of road traffic collisions. The case was decided in 1966.
b7493f9860159f40d17512f6f160b848
Ball v. United States Ball v. United States, 163 U.S. 662 (1896), is one of the earliest United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Double Jeopardy Clause.
fba82573c8413f8e9b606d421eaa27b1
Sturgeon v. Frost Sturgeon v. Frost, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under section 103(c) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, the National Park Service may only regulate "non-public" lands in Alaska according to Alaska-specific laws.
c87bb4b1aae296cd7e86da69a8f793b0
Archibald C. Buchanan Archibald C. Buchanan (January 7, 1890 – May 3, 1979) was born in Tazewell, Virginia. He received his higher education at Hampden-Sydney College (B.A. degree, 1910) and Washington and Lee University. (LL. B. degree, 1914). He was admitted to the bar and began practice in Tazewell, where he was mayor from 1917 to 1921 and commissioner of accounts from 1919 to 1927. He was elected judge of the Twenty-second Judicial Circuit in 1927 and served in that position until 1946 when he was elected to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Justice Buchanan remained on the bench of the Supreme Court until he retired on September 30, 1969. Justice Buchanan was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and Phi Delta Phi. He received honorary Doctor of Law (LL. D.) degrees from Washington & Lee University in May 1949 and from Hampden-Sydney College in June 1969.
9cdf8d9f29687eea2cd12ccd14b9f1d7
American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh (ABC) Settlement Agreement American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh (ABC) Settlement Agreement
b09ee26fa02bebf4b1eb3a7b421582d7
City of Richmond v. United States City of Richmond v. United States, 422 U.S. 358 (1975), was a case that upheld Richmond, Virginia's annexation of land from surrounding counties.
3b5a6711d3312ad44e2af2f67324dd14
Vance v. Terrazas Vance v. Terrazas, 444 U.S. 252 (1980) was a United States Supreme Court decision that established that a United States citizen cannot have his or her citizenship taken away unless he or she has acted with an intent to give up that citizenship. The Supreme Court overturned portions of an act of Congress which had listed various actions and had said that the performance of any of these actions could be taken as conclusive, irrebuttable proof of intent to give up U.S. citizenship. However, the Court ruled that a person's intent to give up citizenship could be established through a standard of preponderance of evidence (i.e., more likely than not) — rejecting an argument that intent to relinquish citizenship could only be found on the basis of clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence.
9224be6a3df01cfd64cac435afacbe3c
Waite Court The Waite Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1874 to 1888, when Morrison Waite served as the seventh Chief Justice of the United States. Waite succeeded Salmon P. Chase as Chief Justice after the latter's death. Waite served as Chief Justice until his death, at which point Melville Fuller was nominated and confirmed as Waite's successor. The Waite Court presided over the Gilded Age and the end of the Reconstruction Era. It also played an important role in the 1876 presidential election, as five of its members served on the Electoral Commission that was created to settle the contested election. During the Waite's tenure, the jurisdiction of the federal courts was expanded by the Jurisdiction and Removal Act of 1875, which gave federal courts full jurisdiction over federal questions.
4eaae000df3fe7dba827e3955f1c8a2c
Bowen v Paramount Builders (Hamilton) Ltd Bowen v Paramount Builders (Hamilton) Ltd [1977] 1 NZLR 394 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding liability in tort defective products. It is infamous among New Zealand law students for being one of the hardest and longest cases they have to study in their first year.
81e69973be259987d998837d3decfba8
Watson v. Jones Watson v. Jones, 80 U.S. 679 (1871), is a United States Supreme Court case. The case was based upon a dispute regarding the Third or Walnut Street Presbyterian Church in Louisville, Kentucky. The Court held that in adjudications of church property disputes, 1) courts cannot rule on the truth or falsity of a religious teaching, 2) where a previous authority structure existed before the dispute, courts should defer to the decision of that structure, and 3) in the absence of such an internal authority structure, courts should defer to the wishes of a majority of the congregation. Because the Walnut Street Presbyterian Church had a clear internal authority structure, the court granted control of the property to that group, even though it was only supported by a minority of the congregation.
5a6381cad04d92f25cb1e7408edb6ab4
Dickinson v. Zurko Dickinson v. Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999) , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that appeals from the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences are to be reviewed for whether the Board's conclusions are supported by "substantial evidence" under the APA.
1162ffcb5c4ad96642359900ea3fb09c
Van Staphorst v. Maryland Van Staphorst v. Maryland, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 401 (1791), was the first case docketed with the United States Supreme Court. Although the court agreed to hear and decide the case, the suit was settled before oral arguments. "Collet v. Collet" was the first appellate case docketed with the court. "West v. Barnes" was the first case decided by the court.
3797030f1814995ab6c3e88dcaabf6d7
Budweiser trademark dispute The Budweiser trademark dispute is an ongoing series of legal disputes between two beer companies who claim trademark and geographic origin rights to the name "Budweiser". The dispute has been ongoing since 1907, and has involved more than 100 court cases around the world.
a1116b3a4a1f45000dd2f21da42b8c3c
Downes v. Bidwell Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) , was a case in which the US Supreme Court decided whether US territories were subject to the provisions and protections of the US Constitution. This issue is sometimes stated as whether the Constitution follows the flag. The resulting decision narrowly held that the Constitution did not necessarily apply to territories. Instead, the US Congress had jurisdiction to create law within territories in certain circumstances, particularly in those dealing with revenue, which would not be allowed by the Constitution for proper states within the Union. It has become known as one of the "Insular Cases".
07c9bca4b657b8ba8a80a24e4ececf95
Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia Landmark Communications v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case that was argued on January 11, 1978 and decided on May 1, 1978.
ca5d993ee99ad1ec17b21cc3323192f5
United States v. Wurzbach United States v. Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396 (1930), is a unanimous ruling by the US Supreme Court that the term "political purpose," as used in the Federal Corrupt Practices Act, was not impermissibly vague. The Supreme Court reversed the district court, which had quashed an indictment under the Act.
818886cc13f49f6e917d69ac2d3017f9
The Telephone Cases The Telephone Cases were a series of U.S. court cases in the 1870s and 1880s related to the invention of the telephone, which culminated in the 1888 decision of the United States Supreme Court upholding the priority of the patents belonging to Alexander Graham Bell. Those telephone patents were relied on by the American Bell Telephone Company and the Bell System—although they had also acquired critical microphone patents from Emile Berliner.
95d2927369f95f1d1a55b34a0244c3b1
Branzburg v. Hayes Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision invalidating the use of the First Amendment as a defense for reporters summoned to testify before a grand jury. The case was argued February 23, 1972 and decided June 29 of the same year. The reporter lost his case by a vote of 5-4. This case is cited for the rule that in federal courts, a reporter may not generally avoid testifying in a criminal grand jury, and it remains the only case in which the U.S. Supreme Court has considered the use of "reporters' privilege".
642bbf0a789c9c5fe6c587c58a6d8e00
Murdock v. City of Memphis Murdock v. City of Memphis, 87 U.S. 590 (1875), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.